Loading...
8-22-050 �Valley OPEN SPACE & RECREATION COMMISSION Meeting Agenda Brookview Community Center Monday, August 22, 2005 7:00 PM I. Call to Order II. Roll Call Chuck Cahill Kelly Kuebelbeck Jerry Sandler, Chair III. Agenda Changes or Additions IV. Approval of Minutes — June 27, 2005 James Heine Tom Kuelbs Jim Vaughan, Vice Chair V. Al Lundstrom, Environmental Coordinator a.Minnaqua Restoration Project b. Medley Park Stream Bank Stabilization Project VI. Brookview Park Performance Area — Don Anderson, Diane Nimmen VII. Deer Population Update VIII. Old Business a) Envision b) Regional Trail Update IX. Adjournment Jim Johnson Roger McConico Tom Zins v a 49 11ey OPEN SPACE & RECREATION COMMISSION Meeting Minutes Brookview Community Center Monday, June 27, 2005 5:15 PM 1. CALL TO ORDER Sandler called the meeting to order at 5:15 p.m. 11. ROLL CALL Present: Chuck Cahill, Jim Johnson, Kelly Kuebelbeck, Roger McConico, Jerry Sandler, Tom Zins, Rick Jacobson, Director of Parks and Recreation; Greg Johnson, Administrative Assistant; Tom Klatt, Public Works Maintenance Manager; Don Anderson, Golden Valley Rotary Club; and Diane Dimmer, Golden Valley Federated Women's Club. Absent: James Heine, Tom Kuelbs, and Jim Vaughan. III. AGENDA CHANGES OR ADDITIONS Jacobson introduced a letter from Three Rivrs Park District, which detailed the winter aerial deer survey results. IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES — May 23, 2005 MOTION: Moved by McConico and seconded by Zins to approve the minutes. Motion carried unanimously. V. BUS TOUR OF PERFORMANCE AREAS A. Potential Brookview Sites Three potential performance area sites were visited by the commission. Jacobson talked briefly about each site and answered questions. Chuck Cahill suggested a fourth site; discussion followed. The commission raised concerns about site #2 (located on the north side of the large shelter's parking lot) regarding sunlight hitting the spectators. The accessibility of the location received praise as well as the specific area being separate from the rest of the park. Anderson presented site #3 (located on the corner of Hwy. 55 & Winnetka Ave.). A bowl shape design was favored, especially since traffic noise would possibly be softened by the berm nearby. Parking and restrooms were a concern: many spectators would have to park in the Golden Valley Shopping Center lot and use the walking bridge to cross Hwy. 55. Visitors would also have to walk to the tennis shelter to use the restrooms. Klatt noted that this is the current snow dump site and project staging area for the city's public works department, and would have to be relocated if a performance area was constructed there. Numerous fees associated with the proposed transition would be a problem, including the rIlocation of a dump site, parking, handicap access, etc. Commission member Cahill suggested a site he saw fit for the proposed facility. The site (between the playground and large shelter next to the pond) has favorable sightlines from both the playground and large shelter. Klatt noted that this is a low area where drainage collects from the rest of the park. It was mentioned that adding the performance venue in this area may tend to crowd that part of the park which already has the picnic shelter and the playground. B. St. Louis Park (Wolfe Park, 3700 Monterey Dr) Anderson presented the amphitheater in Wolfe Park. He detailed the two-year old area, which includes an uncovered concrete performance area, electricity, and multi -tiered amphitheater seating for 350 people. After talking with St. Louis Park staff, Anderson said the sun is a problem for viewers at certain times, and the area requires a large amount of maintenance. C. Hopkins (Downtown Park, 16 9th Ave S) Nimmer presented the performance • area located in a downtown park, which was finished in 2004. The performance area was paid for by city funds. Nimmer noted that it is a much more modest facility in comparison to the amphitheater in St. Louis Park. The 40' x 20' structure cost $27,000 to construct, while the entire park area cost $100,000. Seating included circular benches that were donated by citizens. The entertainment stage is located in a non-residential area near retail and office buildings. Commission members had positive remarks about the stage's roof and backdrop. Klatt introduced an idea that an entertainment stage like that in Hopkins could be used as a third picnic shelter in Brookview Park on non-performance days, which received positive comments from the commission. D. New Hope (New Hope Outdoor Theatre in Civic Center Park, 44th & Xylon Avenues N) Anderson presented the outdoor theater in New Hope which is adjacent to the city offices and swimming pool. New Hope's perfo -mance area was also paid for by city capital funds. This site is a theater site, where a local theater group hired by the city performs nine times throughout the summer. The outdoor theater seats 400 to 500 people and is a short distance away from restrooms and a concession stand. With three venues sharing the parking lot, spaces fill quickly, so alternative parking is provided in the Kmart parking lot across the street. VI. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Moved by McConico, seconded by Kuebelbeck to adjourn at 7:55 p.m. Motion carried unanimously. 2 The City of Golden Valley requested a concept design for creation of a wetland bank site on a city -owned property on Minnaqua Drive. Based on this request, we created a concept design that includes the following: • .75 acres of new wetland credit • .65 acres of public value credit • Replaces areas of turf and exotic species (reed canary grass) with native grasses, wildflowers, shrubs and trees, that will require minimum maintenance • Provides viewing areas of Bassett Creek and the new wetland off the adjacent trail The benefits that the City will realize from the implementation of the proposed wetland bank include the following: is The City will create 1.4 acres of wetlands that can be used to mitigate for impacts to wetlands that may be unavoidable. as the City completes roadway or other infrastructure projects. • The City will provide additional floodplain storage within the Bassett Creek floodplain, which helps to manage high flows along the creek during larger storm events. • The City will provide additional diverse, native habitat adjacent to the creek, which will provide food, nesting, and resting areas for resident wildlife and for migratory species that use the creek corridor. • The City will restore wetland within a fully -developed urban area, where many wetlands were lost as the City developed. This opportunity is rare, given the value of urban land. IS The plant communities planned for the site will require lower ongoing maintenance inputs than the turf grass that currently dominates the site. The incorporation of the existing ditch into the new wetland will also allow for elimination of reed canary grass, an aggressive exotic species that currently dominates the ditch area, and replanting with native species. Bonestroo Bonestroo, Rosene, Andedik and Associates, Inc. is an Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer and Employee Owned Principals: Otto G. Bonestroo, P.E. - Marvin L. Sorvala, P.E. - Glenn R. Cook, P.E. - Robert G. schunicht P.E. • Jerry A. Bourdon, P.E. •Mark A. Hanson, P.E Senior Consultants: Robert W. Rosene, P.E. - Joseph C. Anderlik, P.E. - Richard E. Turner,Rosene P.E. • Susan M. Eberiin, C.P.A. Anderfik & Associates Engineers & Architects Associate Principals: Keith A. Gordon, P.E. • Robert R. Pfefferfe, P.E. - Richard W. Foster, P.E. - David O. Loskota, P.E.. - Michael T. Rautmann, P.E. - Ted K. Field, P.E. - Kenneth P. Anderson, P.E. - Mark R. Rotfs, P.E. - David A. Bonestroo, M.B.A. - Sidney P. Williamson, P.E., L.S. - Agnes M. Ring, M.B.A. - Allan Rick Schmidt, P.E. - Thomas W. Peterson, P.E. - James R. . Maland, P.E. • Miles B. Jensen, P.E. - L. Phillip Gravel III, P.E. - Daniel J. Edgerton, P.E. - Ismael Martine, P.E. - Thomas A. Syfko, P.E. - Sheldon J. Johnson • Dale A. Grove, P.E. Thomas A. Roushar, P.E. - Robert J. Devery, P.E. Offices: St. Paul, St. Cloud, Rochester and Willmar, MN - Milwaukee, WI - Chicago, IL Date: June 22, 2005 Website: www.bonesboo.com To: Al Lundstrom, Environmental Coordinator, City of Golden Valley From: Sherri Buss, RLA, Bonestroo & Associates Subject: Proposed Minnaqua Drive Wetland Bank Site The City of Golden Valley requested a concept design for creation of a wetland bank site on a city -owned property on Minnaqua Drive. Based on this request, we created a concept design that includes the following: • .75 acres of new wetland credit • .65 acres of public value credit • Replaces areas of turf and exotic species (reed canary grass) with native grasses, wildflowers, shrubs and trees, that will require minimum maintenance • Provides viewing areas of Bassett Creek and the new wetland off the adjacent trail The benefits that the City will realize from the implementation of the proposed wetland bank include the following: is The City will create 1.4 acres of wetlands that can be used to mitigate for impacts to wetlands that may be unavoidable. as the City completes roadway or other infrastructure projects. • The City will provide additional floodplain storage within the Bassett Creek floodplain, which helps to manage high flows along the creek during larger storm events. • The City will provide additional diverse, native habitat adjacent to the creek, which will provide food, nesting, and resting areas for resident wildlife and for migratory species that use the creek corridor. • The City will restore wetland within a fully -developed urban area, where many wetlands were lost as the City developed. This opportunity is rare, given the value of urban land. IS The plant communities planned for the site will require lower ongoing maintenance inputs than the turf grass that currently dominates the site. The incorporation of the existing ditch into the new wetland will also allow for elimination of reed canary grass, an aggressive exotic species that currently dominates the ditch area, and replanting with native species. � I I I \ -;t 8 I ------------------------------------ ------ r , n m p o 0 Y + m m m m U 0 z a o � o e c $ $ 1 1 , 1 I 1 1 1 � -� _____________ 858 y''L - - 'I""`. ---------------------------- _ _-_-___----------- t \ _____________--_. - 'k\ ' i ' 1 . . 1 1 I �! _.i N M U h - a W n m p o 0 Y + m m m m U 0 z a o � o e c $ $ M L,OUISMap output Page 1 at-, ivi i httn-//Lais.loL,is.ora/servlet/cam.esri.esrimay.Esrimap?ServiceNaine=gv LOGISmap_OV... 08/22/2005 CHEEK INVENTORY 2001 MEDICINE LAKE 'BRANCL'AIT � ` _ R SCALE: 1 INCH = 100 FEETN BASSETf CREEK KY 50 0 50 100 Feet SOURCE: Engineering Department + Reach #1 X111// �l�jll! l q /lI!11111I ca II 1 11111 1 LLLJ 114 Landscaping .-901\ � c I � _ I : _902- C -----r--- EXC- POND . 1 I\ltl ONSTRUCTION iaL✓J �p11 t WORK LIMITS It 11�� UI I I � -90 4e 11111 �� - Illl It�I1 Q h I NIIIf r� I 1 REMOVE IIIj1j1 (l / 51 LF. 36” CMP po� T 10j �� ---- -90 o\ \ �/ -----` ----------- I CONSTRUCTION I WORK LIMITS I I 1 I 1 I T\\ I L----- disturbance w/MnDOT seed mix 5B and Type 2 erosion control blanket. 4" TOPSOIL, MnDOT SEED MIX 5B, W/TYPE 2 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET _Z1 J O J � Z ~ <L�Z� >< L) -H X ii U . W. STRIP MIN. 6" . EXISTING CHANNEL FILL SECTION No Scale r - 0 40 so Scale in feet 143805109\Cod\Dwq\143805109BC101 I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I Z W I Q I Z I � \\ ,W I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 7:74:58 1 I AM CDT I I I I I I I I 1 \ \ I / I � I I I 1 I 1 \♦ \ I _ I I 1 I I I 1 \ \\\ \ I \\\ I STRIP AND FILL I I I I 1 I I I I I 1 I \\ ♦\ / / LSEE EXIST. CHANNEL FILL I I I I I 1 _ ------------------------------ T - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I SECTION - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - \ i ----L-----1-------I----1- ---- L T---------------{ I CLEAR AND GRUB v T-_-____-----'1 I CLEAR AND GRUB I\� s VA TREES IN CONFLICT v I I I I I I TREES IN CONFLICTS 910 I WITH STORM SEWER y t ` WITH CHANNEL CONSTRUCTION I I INSTALL 1 CONSTRUCTION I I `BVI -b INSTALLATION I _ "�. CHANNEL WORK LIMITS ROCK 90 • \ i' / \ �0 v CONSTRUCTION N I CONSTRUCTION I I CONSTRUCTION 1'• / a I I I EXISTING I 1 I I WORK LIMITS �� oQ-907\ �\ v /\ I I I BITUMINOUS I \ I I 1 1 I SAWCUT� ( F l 1 \ /\ I 1 I I ROADWAY I I 1 REMOVE & REPLACE -%� - \ ` l Y o CONACTCESS ON I BITUMINOUS 9/ - I I I I I TRAIL 1 � ! /- 904` `9p / `i �� � t t'• CLEAR AND GRUB TREES IN CONFLICT // s -� WITH CHANNEL Oma' /i -� _ 11 � ' 1 �� CONCRETEI \ / WEIR 03=/ 1 \ < IIs 'i 11, CONSTRUCTION �f ' 4903--�� c OOO P_ \ CONCRETE / / r `-•-----I-----I- - ------------�- �p c� I � \ WEIR 1\ �\\J <- <<-- « JSALVAGELIGHREINSTALL i 1p NOTES \ \\ u \ SAWCUT \ �\ 1. Restore construction entrance w/4" topsoil, fertilizer, MnDOT seed mix 60B and EMOVE & REPLACE co \ \ \ Type 1 mulch. BITUMINOUS �\ \\ INF/E�p \� 2. Restore areas disturbed by pipe construction w/4" topsoil, MnDOT seed mix 5B to TRAIL \\ =�/ �� \ �� erosion control \0_,�•1��� r/� CLEAR \\ / & GRUB TREE \\ 3. Restore channelconstructosoil, MnDOT seed mix 26 w topsoil, w 4"'to T e 3 erosion control blanket. / / 1 I \ Y - �S�„'.4Si i - 1 h I j I Y� / \ \ 4. Restore pond excavation from elevation 899.6 to elevation 902.0 w/MnDOT seed mix 100B and Type 1 mulch. Restore areas from elevations 902.0 to edge of I X111// �l�jll! l q /lI!11111I ca II 1 11111 1 LLLJ 114 Landscaping .-901\ � c I � _ I : _902- C -----r--- EXC- POND . 1 I\ltl ONSTRUCTION iaL✓J �p11 t WORK LIMITS It 11�� UI I I � -90 4e 11111 �� - Illl It�I1 Q h I NIIIf r� I 1 REMOVE IIIj1j1 (l / 51 LF. 36” CMP po� T 10j �� ---- -90 o\ \ �/ -----` ----------- I CONSTRUCTION I WORK LIMITS I I 1 I 1 I T\\ I L----- disturbance w/MnDOT seed mix 5B and Type 2 erosion control blanket. 4" TOPSOIL, MnDOT SEED MIX 5B, W/TYPE 2 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET _Z1 J O J � Z ~ <L�Z� >< L) -H X ii U . W. STRIP MIN. 6" . EXISTING CHANNEL FILL SECTION No Scale r - 0 40 so Scale in feet 143805109\Cod\Dwq\143805109BC101 I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I 3: Ln b W L , =Z am m v = oto d 3 a to en Ln C X NM�tIs- ri a O Z O LLI Z :2 Z> 0 O In X _X W I- m JOf z Q 12_ a J z In- LLJ O LLJo w C) W Ir J O 0 143805109CIDI-DWG C1.01 Z W I Q I Z I � ,W I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 7:74:58 1 I AM CDT 3: Ln b W L , =Z am m v = oto d 3 a to en Ln C X NM�tIs- ri a O Z O LLI Z :2 Z> 0 O In X _X W I- m JOf z Q 12_ a J z In- LLJ O LLJo w C) W Ir J O 0 143805109CIDI-DWG C1.01 WN i...• , �, i�� fin` * ,7r r =''n 1!2 7 i f I If �' ee , I Jw 1.0 2005 TO THE MAYOR AND CITY MANAGER OF THE CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY: RESOLUTION FROM THE SOUTH RICE LADE ASSOCIATION We, the South Rice Lake Association, with a rnajdrity:vote of the membership households present at the May 18, 2005 annual meeting, voted to request that the City of Golden Valley undertake a study of the Meer population in Golden Valley neighborhoods with a focus of herd management Shirley McLaughlin, President South Rice Lake Association Q0 xtlle,/UZ? &obeli lel l ren 5IY