07-24-12 BZA Agenda Board of Zoning Appeals
Regular Meeting
Tuesday, July 24, 2012
7 pm
7800 Golden Valley Road
Council Chambers
I. Approval of Minutes — June 26, 2012 Regular Meeting
II. The Petition(sj are:
1231 Unity Avenue North
Brett Cummings, Applicant (12-07-10)
Request: Waiver from Section 11.72 Fences Subd, 3(A)(1) Fence Regulations
• 2 ft. taller than the 6 ft. height allowed for fences located in side yards
Purpose: To allow for the constructian of an 8 ft. tall fence along the side yard
(north) property line.
III. Other Business
IV. Adjournment
�, This document is available in alternate#ormats upon a 72-hour request.Please call
: 7b3-593-8006{TTY: 763-593-3968)to make a request. Examples of alternate formats
'� may include larg�print,e(ectronic, Brailfe,audiocassette,etc.
C
C
C
C
C
(
\ �
�
\ ` (
\ — E
� anua�� �
, �?un �
, ''` � •
1 ���� �� (
� oo�•9�p "'; �
� 68 'O�!'�' ; i
� 3 ,�Zl,t�0.00 N
, '
_ _ 08 f'f' --,
-, .- —
, � �
� �
� �
� � �
� �
o �
^�;
0
B
0
1
g'gl 8'$Z' o
r— �;— °o
l�,�r.a�-,ru-,� � �zf� -�'s[-
i �
�? �. �w�lr-,1w-�']
� 6ui��aM p 6ui�six3 �;
1 N —=�
� � , , �
� � �0'L9
O � L''l I � �
1 t co ' � � I �
�0 M� u p� I . `,+
y� � ^1 y�j � � 1 �.1�
� a' 1 °' ' � ! `� � �,'_
0o i � s z� � , � � �
� I I � � N �' �
� I � �
� �
I � � �-
i 1 "
�
t �� ��� ����� �� �
I
I � I I
, � J � V
f O �
� � \\
L
� � � � t
�
} o ��..
' `" 1
� �
�
� �
(e) •uoy!PPd P�l a�o�ia1 Ma� uiMl
► �� � spuv��or{� �o �v/d ay� �ad sv
��' � � � �uawaso3 �f�!/,yn puv a6vuio�p i
� - -- - - �
� � - - - - - -r�- - �- - - - - - - - - �
t� 4� � ____ _-- _-.- � � /
\ _ _ , ___ �. .____ - -
�� �
e�__ --6'6�66 �
a 3 «9��60.00 N I� g
� � �
r
I I
W
�
� �
U `�
.�
� H
w
U � �
� �
�
a --
� �
x
� �
0
�
� �
�, o
� � N
� �
N S�
�.W
�
� �� �� , � �
.�;. ,� * � �
,
,� #,•� � , � ���.:
�� �`�� ,� {� � �
�. � f� � °
� +,� ,� ri � � ,;`�� �, N _ �:
� � is x�1.. �>.a. �
. • '
���d r i
, 1r�; .�. ' � s: ,� . .. .
i'� .�,! ` 1,. �„�� � ':n � ��, �
i r, u�w
�<��1} '� � � � � �
� +^ � ,.ry�� N z�'.� ;,
,� �� y � x � �
i R �
�& �,�g •��� �
� s �a .
��,�,- � �� � • . .
w r
t'��., ' �o... � ., ��, � ., .
�+ "` � �
,., . . �� .p �,�;s'�u' �^i�"k . . � ..
�` ��, � „
, .� � . �� �
S "� .__ . � ffi, .v� �.�� ' .
. ,,{ ..m.. . _ . q .
� ar�i �� kvb�. � . r �` �`��a 3n ` . . .. �
f � �y^
� i k�
a
�� � } � �
u � , s1s �� t �3.
:: �,
... � . .. . .�" '
��o ° .! �. # . . .. ..,
a
A �W I� � �
4
p y
m �� 71. .c��� €�:. . ..
�. s ' { �
s�� ���, i ;��"�� �� �
�
��` �° � � �.��
« ,�..
I t �
t:�` "' _�' ���� i ,
� '.��Y + � . .� ��. ���A ..
i'`` �'+
,� ;/'s h• y � �II I. �. �' �� . . ,.
.. ��t��* 4' ;� • 4� � � x � . �
��r:+� r.~ �� .�. ,��� ,�. �:,
� !' ,' ' . �
^;!'� t,.. xn,'�."�� � '��'�u'� �y �'�
+ �_'. .�
i
� a 5�� .� s j � � �� � +� �
� . .
,� �`'t�. ' � � ;R'
� �. .
' ,! •� .'~ � �� ,��` 4. . .
�.
� �
•• �.I t� . J e �+ , ' � .
S
) �"x�' � s� � .y.- '� :��..'� .
' �`. A�V �� � �y ���� a� _ .
4, +� �� '
t � # ���
`� -}��i` }��� �f f�.� 3 '7 ? �� � ,_� =�,z,'�
- '�. -[�- . �?f,.� i ,� .. „1
,�. .� �_ ., '� .�.� �"z� �
•1��vf�i� `'4�r• R.,�� . .' r� '�. <. .. . _.
i ����.,/�,i �����. �; � ,�.5�.• �' �
. � .
-�• ���3. Y1 , . �a R �y ,
.� � �� , . .. • � `� � t . .
: �� t �le �., . I,I' �' k
�i+... �; , � , il '�,�'
.
. . _ ,
. �. _
. .
��► � � � �
.. _ ,� , -
�
�;'{� � , �� ��
. .. ,,
, ..
. .
fi' �
y `' ... . � ,+, �
fN��� �"i'I, �
" �.i••• �'� �t :�,; ,„d�I �� � �
xs �- � ��„ � � ,
:° ,,�
�e- � �,� �
���i��� �� �
. . �.�� k��' e.�.: �,Ca � �,���. .
„ � �
+ x �
�' .
. . � ��: � ��
, �
� �� �.
�. t ' - � � ,, , �:I�� � �
•u . � .. �, ,.,t �; , � � . _ �
� : - a ��a � �
,
��
�� F� � � ,��� 9 �
•:�JN 'R� 'k "������rY" � F .
.,�
� ' '� W+r & � ,3� �' q�h. �. a ar
�i� %. y� � � � , A
I "
f"y�i � .� � � � �,�
b'� i+"V °� {� _' x
r` f � ,� `t`54 � � ^ �a
• I�I
� 1 �
�
� �,� �� Nk N °+ �^F 'p ',
�� ; 3 m/ �� liy�T'j. }'�`. �..� ����, �� � � _�
� � s�* '�r r, �` dl #�f�' '� `T` � .���� � � � ;��� . .
.. t�. � '� ��
�,, �",y, a ���� � v
� ^,g�
�y,� 'y��� �
� ��''b � E"tY'G $.� +�I�^ r�.�'�r�+ . �ry � �I 'tl�. q:• 5 ,•• �� . _ .
�,�i .�'� �i�� ^f, � ,�, I�l�s'I.� . � � k "' �+u ��
�R ,t.� .'�" >�.-s w , r �4., ....ct .._.�.• �`y,. e� a
�.�, ' . fA�%::�`� � '� � ,� �
r� d� ' � ' ��r ,
�` <d � k ' '�,�..` q;� � �., y
�11s` .1� ,�t,'� y��� ` �
.
� :,� � �L� ` *� �' , �k � �� �
/ / . a '
.�t ywre- . . .[ PA�"iR¢ !'. r .��� .x �.�0.- x �� . - _
� �:.�F . ��.'�" �� � , y, j �� �� ti �" �`� �,�i` .�
� �^'�.� - ��� ti 1r � �,f.s��4�+' d'ry �'�?� � g,� ��,^� ,�, � �.
f�',#"�' .r± rS r.S�,�. Z't'��'�•x^. �� ,x. .✓`. I i�� ��£��r� ,� .. ,�
:51 a,'r' � d�G!�, X:+1f4 i �.� t
� ��'�¢. � . fi.}(' '�: f �t�'47j ti
•,e!`�� `� `* J�@�Ti` ►�g`;q''y ,
+ 'F •'C;'� y i �� j � i�r;" }'i 7' �. �'�_: .. . .
{ . S'
.
, ' �y
..* k . �.,.
;Y. � �.�4r ��.�4 i� ;� } Y 'n•� � i � . L� ���..
�{' . .
' � � .
.r , .
, ,,,:
, - /
`,. ' 1�: t
.�;; � „ .
� . �.:• � �
� f �� , ,
E." .,{ ,. �'- f!. •� c�#I li ��, ��.`� � � �:, ,�„� #,:i*#;s
a . -� � �{� �c�,
�� 7.Li _ i..-. � . . �''� u�f . ,,.�"F.�B' 1 �s���:, b"..�.�) f 'A�s".*�
j ��.• ��r . , , .-. -- .
t�� .
� �
.� : -
� �:
�'t d�.:, _. .
_.
,r� � ±c...:�,.�. �.ib' :.- / _:'T . .,., .. .�:
- � . .. . ...��:�.�.. . . -�.
* ..-. „ .. �..,. ' , ..... . . � � -- -
.Y
t
� L"�4'��I ��I 3f .
'._ 91w .��, ; �� . •
� • & �r:«�;. ..
..�. .� � � �- �x�..�.:. y,r�,,.,.�..
a 54
r , . * 5�h�y � ��,` . ' . 1# .. .
4
��,�, fi �,�.: �, .
4; ;:.� �.
v j
f: � `
r
� �� ��..�� 7 .° �:y � �.�� .
y 5. 5.
���� . i' k'�,{.
'•' ���� � '� .
� �
'-y' ''i '�sr)w• '��`�b c '�,- � ,
� ,!.. �, � ' w�5� � � .
Xk?y �
. te i '�.��a '���. � .
. �� �
�Z �`;v 2 � .
. • o�_i . �_.�y
.a ':�%�.+*
M' - �}�-" ' i r
, _ � S
� '� I :
� 4 { ..
;9 _� � ! � �� '
'�.Yt, ' � ���'= � � y*-,- �
' , - � �_ '
�; . �
.,: �
+ . hb � i., K�� ����4� .
+ . . � .. . a .. - . . ..
' . . �l .. � � � � .
f J �,
, � �.�. �;y4..�� } �`., rl�3t '.. � - ��. .
.� ��� � � �;. .
+ �_ H � ��� �� . L 'i . . .
��� y � y,�� Y .
��, . ��j't _,�,. t,i'6�.� '8 _ '[ . .
.. � . . . 'L,9Ar' .
• ti .. - � �'` � i � . . ., �
F�'�� ' . � � . .
��,y-. i f . . . . .
�+ . � �'�1 y��.` T j �T._ �a.�
� �.F,�
� � /' �) �����k i :' x„i�.e��� . A .
!
� A,'
�� F f't� ���• ������ � .Y�, �e
�1�f.�` ����%_ ` � �y�yi'��uwa,. . . .. _
1 f
, ' ♦�� . , ���.. . .
� , �:
�
� � ����?�V�
A
�s ��I,�'' �
�.
'��
3'
Z`. ��t...���s
�� .
� a �'! ,
*� "
��`v�i
.
*' .
p t ,
� � � .z`k' /
F ,y.,: , ., �. .:,,�.,..,..a
,�! ,.,...., .,k_ '�/�
., a
re +- .
���F
S „. »�.
�K � '4``t�£.�:.' .
�4 k. ...� ..,.
- ,��_ . �� y li �
'� ����
�,z �' �� d.
� '�',y�k#,R ,�. .t' ���, " ���"�d+ .. .
� "±ro.. °s _. `�„„ �'`,s�':`" � .
. l .'s:. �..
� � � �..
i
.,�."�," y� � _
�..:
:
� - "� � ,:' �:.�-
�
� � < , . �
�
., � ` , �� , _ '_ � �
;, ., �;.; E ���' �� , '_
� �;
" , :. � „�1�.���. ��r
4 ae
�
°�'�C
�.
,. , �. .
__ _ � �, �� . �r ��-��ti.;�;...�:
�. , �. ._ a
y;*.�" .
.�._
�, , .
,
�,,.�. , w .�..;. , _ . >;.- k�� `
..�
x:
��� �p.
� y: #�.�`iX'ss
k� 4
4� M �
k ? � � � ��„ k� „� +����� s,� � .`
,d $
rk ��+E "'. "��wra�`�,�� y4s.�'y a�. � �" � +� ��.
,:��,�*„����� �.:ti���+ ��t�� �a �' , �.� �:�e�c �����p�`�.F��i,�.'
� M1 ,�- s,�=� . - . " . ..
�'�'"i3"�`�� '�� r"`v� a ��� �. �
� � . .. , xi
,• , ��
� .
� � �•
a , . .
- .. �rt . � _
��. x. ; , ' <_. . „ . , . ,; ._
;r
Minutes of a Regular Meeting of the
Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals
June 26, 2012
A regular meeting of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals was held an Tuesday,
June 27, 2012 at City Hall, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. Chair
Nelson called the meeting to order at 7 pm.
Those present were Members, Boudreau-Landis, Maxwell and Nelson, and Planning
Commission Representatives McCarty and Waldhauser. Alsa present were Director of
Planning and Qevelopment Mark Grimes and Administrative Assistant Lisa Wittman.
I. Approval of Minutes — May 22, 2012 Regular Meeting
MOVED by McCarty, seconded by Boudreau-Landis and motion carried unanimously to
approve the May 22, 2012 minutes as submitted.
II. The Petitions are:
6931 Olson Memorial Highway
RHT Properties, Applicant (12-06-09) `
Request: Waiver from Section 11.72 Fences Subd. 3(A)(1) Fence Regulations
• 2 ft. taller than the 4 ft. tieight allawed for fences located in front yards
Purpose; To allow for the construction of a 6 ft. tall fence in the front yard.
Grimes referred to a Iocation map and explained the applicant's request to build a 6-
foot tall fence in the front yard. He stated that the Single Family Residential zoning
district allows fences tc� be 4 feet tall in frant yards but the applicant requires a taller
fence because the home wi11 be used as a foster home and will have children with
special ne�ds living there so they need the taller fence for safety.
McGarty asked about fihe differences between a group home and foster home. Grimes
explained that bo�h uses are permitted, per state statute, in the Single Family
Residential zoning district.
Maxwell asked if the applicant could build a 6-faot tall fence if it was located 35 feet or
more away fram the front property line. Grimes said yes. Waldhauser and McCarty both
said they thought that no 6-foot tall fences were allowed in front yards at all. Grimes
explained that the 35-foot setback area is considered to be the frant yard. He added
that no 6-foot tall fences could be built in the setback area but fences, or structures
much taller, could be built up to the 35-foot setback line.
Pete Thomley, Meridian Services, representing the applicant, explained that they are
attempting to fence off the two front entrances as a safety precaution.
Minutes of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals
June 26, 2012
Page 2
Waldhauser asked about the type af fencing material being used. Thomley said it will
be a no-maintenance, vinyl fence in a darker color to match the hause. Waldhauser
said she understands that the fence can't be scalable, but asked if there can be some
space between the fence boards. Thomley said there won't be any space between the
boards for the safety of the children and that is also the way the panels are
manufactured.
McCarty asked if there would be a gate across the driveway. Thomtey drew on the
survey where he is proposing to build the fence. The Board concluded that since`the
fence will be not be in the 35-foot front yard setback area the applicant does not ne�d
to apply for a variance.
Since there were people in the audience wishing to comment, Nelson opened the public
hearing, even though it was determined that no variance will be required for the
proposed fence.
Dan Browdie, 70Q1 Olson Memorial Highway, said he is concerned that the proposed
fence will be attractive to criminals because it will provide cover and`there is easy
access to Olson Memorial Highway. He said this house has been broken into in the
past and someone also attempted to break in to his home. He questioned why the
applicant is buying a home right on Highway 55 if they are concerned abaut the safety
of the kids, He stated that a fence on this prop�rty would also block his access to the
other neighboring houses and he wauid be forced to walk in the street to visit
neighboring houses. He said he daesn't generally see 6-foot tall fences in front yards
and installing one will really c,hange the [ook of the neighborhood.
Boudreau-Landis explained that most houses are built closer to the 35-foot setback line
and not set as far back as the house in question.
Marilyn Weisberg, 6800 Kingston Circle, said she too has had break-ins. She said there
are people in her neighbarhood who have purposefully installed 6-foot high fences and
non-egress windows in their basements because Golden Valley is very poor at
enforcing its a�ws..She sai� this proposed foster home is a business and she didn't
realize there could be a'�!business located in a residential area like this. She added that
the people that will be living in this house won't care as much abaut it as a mom and
dad with children would. She agreed that the applicant shouldn't buy a house on
Highway 55 if they have children they can't control.
Grimes expTained that companies can own homes and reiterated that rental properties,
group homes and foster care homes are all permitted, legal uses in the Single Family
zoning district. He stated that the City Council has tried to work with the State
Legislature regarding group home issues to no avail.
Laura King, 6921 Olson Memorial Highway, said she bought her home seven years ago
and it was broken into within months. She stated that the first thing the police told her
was that the fence they had, which was similar to the one being proposed, should be
Minutes of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals
June 26, 2012
Page 3
removed because it makes the house a target for criminals. She said they are their own
community of four lots and they have to keep an eye on one anather and the proposed
fence, put right in the middle, will cut everybody else off. She said this proposed fence
will also reduce her property value which has already gone down $100,000 since she
bought it. She said if the houses in this area take another hit, they are going to end up
being empty. She said if the applicant needs to build a fence like this to keep the
children safe then it is probably not the ideal tocation for them to purchase. She added
that there are 11 properties in a five mile radius that offer the same square footage for
the same price or less that are not on a highway and three of them already have a ;
fenced-in back yard. She said this proposal does not make sense at all fcir anyone
involved.
Gina Hyun, 6837 Olson Memorial Highway, said she is concefned about the children in
the neighborhood. She said she was told this was going to be a group home and now
she is hearing that it is going to be a foster home but she has never heard af a foster
home with staff and this is an unusual foster situation. She asked what kind of people
will be living in the house, if they are sex offenders and if children wauld still be able to
play outside. She said she doesn't understand the nature of their program and she
wants to be safe in her house and not live in fear. �he asked if the neighbors are going
to be chased out of Golden Valley and if the City is on the neighbor's side or this
company's side.
Nelson thanked people for expressing their concerns. She reiterated that the Board of
Zoning Appeals really can't address any ofi the concerns because their job is to hear
variance requests and it has been determined that this proposal doesn't need a
variance. Waldhauser agreed that the �oard's hands are completely tied, She
suggested people take their,conc�rns ta'their State Legislature.
Nelson closed the public hearin�.
III. Other Bu'�iness
Election of Officers
MOVED by Ma�cwell, seconded by McCarty and motion carried unanimously to continue
the current sl�te of�fficers for another year (Nelson as Chair and Boudreau-Landis as
Vice Chair).
IV. Adjournment
The meeting was adjourned at 7:43 pm.
Nancy J. Nelson, Chair Joseph S. Hogeboom, Staff Liaison
.
��ty c�
Planning Department
763-593-8095/763-593-8109(fax)
Date: July 16, 2012
To: Board of Zoning Appeals
From: Joe Hogeboom, City Planner
Subject: 1231 Unity Avenue North
Brett and Kristina Cummings, Applicants
Background
Brett and Kristina Cummins, owners of the property at 1231 Unity Avenue North, are seeking a
variance from City Code to allow for the construction of a fence that is higher than permitted by City
Code. Fences in the R-1 Single Family Zoning District may be constructed up to 4 feet in height in
front yards and up to 6 feet in height in side and rear yards. Front yards are defined as any part of
the yard within 35 feet to property lines abutting a street.
The applicants live adjacent to Redeemer Reformed Church. They are requesting to have an $-foot
tali fence along the north side af their property, which is adjacent to the church. The 8-foot tall
section of fence would not be located in the front yard. The residents would like to construct the
fence in order to achieve greater protection from lighting, noise and other activities associated with
an institutional use.
It should be noted that fences are permitted to be up to 8 feet in height in the Institutional Zoning
District. Therefore, the church would be able to construct an 8-foot tall fence on its property
without a variance. All fences that exceed 6 feet in height, regardless of where they are located, are
required to be built with a building permit.
Variances
The proposal requires a variance from the following section of City Code:
• Section 11.72, Subd. 3(A)(1) Fence Regulations.
The applicants are requesting a waiver to this requirement to allow an 8-foot tall fence to be
constructed along the north side property line, within the rear yard of the home.
#�fl5 � � �"
? i ' 1�2fl 1425 1a$6 1429
( ', , � ;
__L___ � � ' 14f1E 1415 � t�'f& 1
'� � 1 [ � 4 ��� ��' : � ,
� � 3 f 6 � '1415 TesfeddfNnyefo�+rtf
� � � s 5350 53�b 536D 1�ilU `
� � _ ....--- I I; �v i
� _ ---- �
�� 1� � a € ` ' 1345 :,
u
� a� _' �op�lRd ` " _
3
� `� � m �. 1380 � ---
� ' , � 5355 5335 53U5 ' 1335 i346
� ° � � � _
_...___�.._�
_,___
�� ' � 1338 ' 136� �
� � 17�41
� 5 4 1355 ; 1325 �
� �
; � ' � 1320
� � � i3�0 131T y
1215 , t ! r i335 � �
� � ' ..... � '1310
__.__.1 ' •3 ,. �.���w .
{ � }
��° ��� �ubject Property
�� � � �����.� �
112D k � 13ti5 � I 130U 12A1 12�4D 511U
� � ,
._..__.._ � �a5 ° �+ ____m._��
�� � � � � �� � ; r� � � .. .. .e . ..
A I'�Y�`C��`.C�. ,. . ...,. �
ti� 11tf2 ; _ : � 12�tU �f ''�'�'�. ; � 123b 1231 �
j � � , v /.i ', �„ , , �
_ � ' � ,z�o , �s�o ,z�� � �as�
� E p �a�� ���o =
, 1221
66t�t! 551b a � �
? �
i 12fl7 12flt1 '12�1 92tf0
# 'l20fl 12UU 'f204 � ,
" Fhc�n[x St _, _,. ,..,, ...� , . E § F
` � F
-" 1 c� 114fi 1741 � � 11&0 1141 � i180
SBUS 1 5525 55{15 � � 1140 1141 � �
I� � � � �
� �
,.,_..�___,.,. ___--
� 1i30 7131 � 1131 � 1130 1131 �" 113U
17$0
� � , j
c�
� d ___ i i12�1 1121 112U
��_� ,,
i'��� 1121 i i q12fl 1121
� � j � � ... � �_mr__
55+tU � ` g :
� � 536t1 1100 52U0 1i0t! 7'i{17 t 1'!�0
5320 53{If! ° �
\'�t , � k � , ` `�, .._______
� � ; , r
� �. ,� .. ... _ . ... _,. ,. ,�,.'1'k�ttanr!Rd.. .....r .._. _ ,.. _. _ _. _. ..._� _, ,.,,.,_ . .. . '... . . . ..
I 1
�� ."° ¢ �_ ' `
.. k kwutk���y�t
� r 1 59+#1 53�7 � f 522'I �
t�T W_� i . 5301 i 1041 104t0 51�1 51'I1 505T
5537 583�'��SS25 i
11;K:<:,w>s.i.ar,L��:n+t3� �a✓r fi+�.e:.��:�. .�s;�,t>.�t:N E 3 3 i3 � z+,3akir . f . .
1
t
���� �• � �_
c�lc�e�t
v�. +��-
Zoning Code Variance Application
1. Street address: �7�� 'U�J.i� �J��
2. Applicant Information:
N a me: �'K.�—,.�.�l.�'`nl r�.,$
Address: �Z�1 L��.�.�� ��E.,.��}'�
�-,��-�.� �[��M���422-
Email Address: � i��15 i 1rlA � e-�MA{L • Coul
Phone Number: �( 12� �'$� -�$I
3. Provide a detailed description of need for a variance from the Zoning Code, ineluding:
• Description of building(s)
• Description of proposed addition(s)
• Description of proposed alteration(s) to property
VVQ-��'� �S ��� �p�. St+�'tL� '�1Y\lL`( �lD'Er�l'tl�L
�ao o ue.. ��.�c ►s (��qs'��a,T --ro �A���e.�t� �PcZ.�,rn�.t�-Y
�'�-�.+ae�c��.c. i��� �o..�rs� 1�1s�-n.n-�oa��. 1�� ��.�a,� Ta
�.�s-r¢.�e.r f� s=►n�. � -�,.ic� A�c��.a� —r� '�e.�c.�c� �,�
r
�...�o�� L��L� —ta �u�� A-� g T�� �. �L. �-�
dZ�-t�- — 2oP � � 1g S tD�
��,e—�-�— �'d �-� ���.Sc-. Lo�r- Tt�.. -�..�r�. T
�,��... �� �oeisrR.v C�'+ED c�F '�otX(Z..
4. Minnesota State Statute 462.357 requires that a property exhibit "practical difficulties" in order for
a variance to be considered. Practical Difficulties:
• result in a use that is reasonable.
• are based on a problem that is unique to the property.
• are not caused by the landowner.
• do not alter the essential character of the locality.
To demonstrate how your request will comply with Minnesota State Statute 462.357, please
respond to the following questions:
Explain the need for your variance request and how it will result in a reasonable use af the
property.
'�,�.1�. �� !��_�ac, --� A �a�,t� �4 �aa�. �•c�
oF Pe���c� �� a2 -��. �aen -�����a.���, ,—� ,
�Ro��1 Tt�-1�►s� �,� -n.c� e�F -� �`�3E.r1.� `1�.f�-K�.r�—�r?�
3�t las-�w�.1�, A�4 �,�rsr �t-�- r�ef� orl-�� r�2� S� c� T�-�.
What is unique about yaur property and how do you feel that it necessitates a variance? '�-`��A•
L-r ts�-+���.�. �.�. fk �.s���,���� --ra����r �e�"
T A-� ��-���oaaL �g€�,�-� A�.n ��r- �s -€��a��� ��.��na�c_
'T�1-�P� �-r �s A�AC�- -ra -Ti�4� ;�,ea���14, l�-r- A-wEA ��t,��. ,R-
-ta -t-�E.. L.t�t�TS ��u►�o� P� P�-T-��lc�-t�5 `f'N�-r �:� ���� tr.
Explain how the need for a variance is based on circumstances that are not a result of a
landowner action.
1E1�._ -1�a.r��_�a�� ov�.2.. -r�-� �,��-,.,t��s -��-r T�� R�e�
('.�wl� `T�!'E t��t Q-,1��G�-� �1 g�PE._o-r..;� Q,�D -"f�� 7�.a.L.J�, �-'c�� �2 rt�..`I'
'�u.oWs us A M�-���n.x� 1��-r�� �e�. I�s,-E.�.r o� 8'-rA� A-s
, ._.�'� �.-�o��D 1�2E.rF'Ee,
Explain how, if granted, the proposed variance will not alter the essential character of your
neighborhood and Golden Valley as a whole.
��-�- rn-tt�2 S�Q�..s oF —rwE �l.��. �� `�I'a `I"'�k� 1� �
3-i�A.ac.�rwt�n �,�L�,H-T. � �rA�FE. ��5�SS� C?�� �� '��C!E
'4��, �t�- a,Ete�u3oe.� 1� -T� �-A A�D"[}�� ��.�. Su(�o2T-
pv2 Pc,,o...�.
5. The City requests that you consider all available project options that are permitted by the Zoning
Code prior to requesting a variance. The Board of Zoning Appeals will discuss alternative options
to seeking variance with you at the public hearing. Please describe alternate ways to do your
project that do not require variances to the Zoning Code.
\J.� �� ���� R� 1�' -�-a�.L �e.� 3�,- u-lo�� �� -r-a
�-,�.�� t.�_so�_ oF o�cL �e�.�ac.� Sc� ��a .-�-E. -�.�,�
,�� .�. -c�-��.�
�� au..o�1� a, 8r M�A-x.�+���n }�E.s��H-r�� ��se�ss�ae, rt"'��
c�n�,.t �.1� —��.. �� r��s.,� 1�.1�� t�-c� +R�e,er�� ��
k �ad�� � ��.-,� c� d� d� _&�� .�. �tE
1Ftoc�u� P+nfl-�•�-�-'��a ��-_
6. Please submit a current survey of your property. You must indicate the proposed addition,
including new proposed building and structure setbacks, on the survey. A copy of Golden Valley's
survey requirements is available upon request. Please note that this application is considered
incomplete without the submittal of a current property survey.
7. Please submit at least one current calor photograph af the area affected by the proposed
variance. Yau may attach a printed photograph to this application, or you may email a digital
image to plannin�@�oldenvallevmn.�av, You may submit additional photographs as needed.
To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct. I
also understand that unless construction of the action applicable to this variance request, if
granted, is not taken within one year,the variance expires.
I have considered all options afforded to me through the City's Zvning Code, and feel that there
is no alternate way to achieve my objective except to seek a variance to zoning rules and
regulations.
I give permission for Golden Valley staff, as well as members of the Board of Zoning Appeals,to
enter my property prior to the public hearing to inspect the area affected by this request.
.�,
Signature of Applicant
If the applicant is not the owner of all property involved in this application, please name the
owner of this property:
Print Name of owner Signature of owner
$150 Application Fee Attached
Please note: The City of Golden Valley will send notice of your variance request to all adjoining
property owners as well as awners of properties directly across streets or alleys. Your neighbors
have the right to address the Board vf Zoning Appeals at your public hearing. You are advised to
personally contact your neighbors and explain your project to them prior to the public hearing.