Loading...
10-08-12 PC Minutes Workshop Meeting of the Golden Valley Planning Commission October 8, 2012 A warkshop meeting of the Planning Commission was held at fhe Golden Valley City Hall, Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota, on Monday, October 8, 2012. Chair Waldhauser called the meeting to order at 7:05 pm. Those present were Planning Commissioners, Cera, Kisch, Kluchka, McCarty, Segelbaum and Waldhauser. Also present were Directar of Planning and Qevelopment Mark Grimes and City Planner Joe Hogeboom. Commissioner Schmidgall was absent. 1. Approval of Minutes September 10, 2012 Regular Planning Commission Meeting MOVED by Waldhauser, seconded by Kisch and motion carried unanimously to approve the September 10, 2012 minutes as submitted. 2. Brainstorming Hogeboam introduced the Planning Commission Brainstorming Session. Hogeboom explained that the Planning Commission is holding an informal brainstorming session to discuss various topics related to the duties of the Planning Commission. The following issues were discussed. A. 2013 Planning Commission Meeting Schedule Hogeboom explained that staff is currently creating the 2013 Planning Commission meeting schedule. Ta eliminate confusion with development project scheduling, as well as to better coordinate public hearings with City Council meetings, staff proposed to reduce the number of monthly Planning Commission meetings to one meeting per month. The Planning Commissian agreed to publish one meeting per month in 2013, which would be the first monthly Planning Commission meeting, which is typically held on the second Monday of the month. The Commission then proposed to leave the second monthly meeting on its schedule in case it is needed. Staff and the Planning Commission will determine, on a case-by-case basis, if a second "back-up" monthly meeting is needed. B. PUD Process Hogeboom stated that staff has received feedback from several of the Planning Commissioners regarding the PUD process and whether or not it could be modified to allow the Planning Commission to have greater control over development site design elements and landscaping requirements. Hogeboom clarified that the Preliminary PUD approval process allows the Planning Commission and the City Council to approve the concept of a development, but that design modifications can still be made during the Final PUD process. The Planning Commission agreed to study current design requirements (which exist for the I-394 Mixed Use Zoning District) in greater detail and see if they should be applied mare broadly to development. The Planning Commission discussed the Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission October 8, 2012 Page 2 possibility of expanding its role as a "Design Review Board" and agreed to bring the matter for discussion at the upcoming HRA/Planning Commission workshop. C. Solar Access Ordinance Mark Grimes shared that he recently became aware of an opportunity to receive free assistance in drafting a solar energy access ordinance. Grimes explained that current City regulations may need to be updated as trends and technology change, and it may now be a goad opportunity to evaluate current ordinances. The Planning Commission showed an interest in evaluating solar energy regulations and requested staff to contact Brian Ross, CR Planning, for more information. Staff will provide an update of the scope of work available from CR Planning at a future meeting. D. Tree House/Play Structure Regulations Hogeboom stated that he has been receiving complaints about tree houses, play forts and swing sets that are perceived to be too tall and too close to property lines. Hogeboom stated that the City does regulate "accessory structures" in the R-1 Single Family Zoning District, but it typically does not regulate play structures. Hogeboom further explained that City Code currently does not define play structures. Waldhauser stated that she believed that it would be worthwhile for staff to study this issue and introduce a draft ordinance that would regulate play structures. She suggested that staff evaluate play structure and other accessory and dwelling unit regulations in neighboring communities. She also suggested that staff get an opinion about play structure regulations from the City Attorney. Grimes agreed and stated that he would provide an update to the Planning Commission at a later meeting. 3. Reports on Meetings of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority, City Council, Board of Zoning Appeals and other Meetings No reports were given. 4. Other Business No other business was discussed. 5. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 8:55 pm. David A. Cera, Secretary