The URL can be used to link to this page

01-22-13 BZA Agenda Board of Zoning Appeals Regular Meeting Tuesday, January 22, 2013 7 pm 7800 Golden Valley Road Council Chambers I. Approval of Minutes — December 19, 2012 Regular Meeting II. The Petition(s) are: 309 Turnpike Road Dmitri Rebrov, Applicant (13-01-01) Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Single Family Zoning District (R-1), Subd. 11(A)(3)(b) Side Yard Setback Requirements • City Code requires an increase in side yard setback area for houses over 15 feet in height. The applicant is asking for a variance from this requirement. Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Single Family Zoning District (R-1), Subd. 11(A)(3)(d) Articulation Requirements • City Code requires any wall longer than 32 feet in length to be articulated. The applicant is asking for a variance from this requirement. 1410 Tyrol Trail Timbercraft Remodelinc,�Applicant (13-01-02) Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Single Family Zoning District (R-1), Subd. 11(B) Height Limitations • 2.5 ft. taller than the allowed 25 ft. for a total height of 27.5 ft. 1950 Douglas Drive North Golden Vallev Conqreqation of Jehovah's Witnesses (Michael Cavel, Applicant (12-12-17) (Continued Item) Request: Waiver from Section 11.46, Subd. 7 Side and Rear Yard Requirements. • 2 ft. off the required 50 ft. to a distance of 48 ft. at the building's closest point to the side yard (north) property line. • 19 ft. off the required 50 ft. to a distance of 31 ft. at the building's closet point to the rear yard (east) property line. • 9 ft. off the required 25 ft. to a distance of 16 ft. at the parking lot's closest point to the side yard (north) property line. Request: Waiver from Section 11.46, Subd. 8 Front Yard Setback Requirements. • 15 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 20 ft. at the parking lot's closest point to the front yard (west) property line. Request: Waiver from Section 11.46, Subd. 9 (2) Accessory Structure Requirements. • 25 ft. off the required 50 ft. to a distance of 25 ft. at the storage shed's closest point to the side yard (north) property line. Request: Section 11.46, Subd. 9 (B)(1) Accessory Structure Requirements. • The proposed storage shed will not be located completely to the rear of the principal structure as required by City Code. Request: Waiver from Section 11.73, Subd. 3 Minimum Number of Off-Street Parking Spaces. • 11 spaces off the required 68 spaces for a total of 57 required parking spaces. III. Other Business IV. Adjournment This document is available in alternate fonnats upon a 72-hour request, Please call `� 763-593-80Qb(TTY: 763-593-3968)to make a request. Examples af alkernate formats � may include large urint,electranic,Sraille,audiocassette,etc. Minutes of a Regular Meeting of the Golden Valley Board of zoning Appeals December 19, 2012 A regular meeting of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals was held on Tuesday, Wednesday, December 19, 2012 at City Hall, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. Chair Nelson called the meeting to order at 7 pm. Those present were Members, Boudreau-Landis, Johnson, Maxwell, Nelson and Planning Commission Representative McCarty. Also present were City Planner Joe Hogeboorn and Administrative Assistant Lisa Wittman. I. Approval of Minutes — Octaber 23, 2012 Regular Meeting ' MOVED by Maxwell, seconded by McCarty and motion carried unanimously to approve the October 23, 2012 minutes as submitted. I1. The Petition(s) are: 1950 Douglas Drive North Golden Vallev Conqreqation of Jehovath's Witnesses (Michael Cave), Applicant 12-( 12_17) Request: Waivers frorn Section 11.46 Institutional Zoning Qistrict (I-1), Subd. 7 Side and F�e�r Y�rd f��quirements • 34 ft. off the;required 50'ft. to a distance of 16 ft. at the building's closest point to the side yard (north) property line. • 9 ft. off the required 25 ft. to a distance of 16 ft. at the parking lot's closest point to the side yard (north) property line. • 14 ft. off the required 25 ft. to a distance of 11 ft. at the parking lot's closest poin#to the rear yard (east) property line. Request: Waivers from Section 11.46 Institutional Zoning District (I-1), Subd. 8 Front Yard Requirements • 20 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 15 ft. at the parking lot's closest point to the front yard (west) property line. Request: Waivers from Section 11.46 Institutional Zoning District (I-1), Subd. 9 Accessory Structure Requirements • 36 ft. aff the required 50 ft. to a distance of 14 ft, at the storage shed's closest point to the rear yard (east) praperty line. Minutes of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals December 19, 2012 Page 2 Hogeboom explained that Gity recently did a study of the Douglas Drive corridor and as a result the intersection of Douglas Drive and Duluth Street, where the subject property is located, will be widened. He stated that the applicants have been considering changes to their building for several years and that this proposed project will coincide with the City/County Douglas Drive project and will allow them to stay in Golden Valley. Hogeboom referred to a site plan and noted that the site is currently constrained and once the construction on Douglas Drive begins, it will be further constrained. He explained the applicants' request to construct a new building locafied further toward the northeast corner of the property than the existing building sits. Nelson asked if the existing building is in conformance wi#h zoning requirements. Hogeboom said the amount of parking is not in conformance, but the building is. He added that if the applicants wanted to build a new building in the same footprint as the existing building they could without the need for v�riances. McCarty questioned if this property was considered for a commercial use in the Douglas Drive Corridor study. Hogeboom stated that sc�me other properties in the corridor were considered for commercial uses, bu# h� didn't think this specific property was addressed because the applic�nts didn't indicate fhat they were planning to move from this location. McCarty asked who suggest�d .the proposed new driveway entrance on Douglas Drive. Hogeboom;�tated that the applicants have been working with the City's Public Works Departt�ri�nt re�ard�ng driveway locations and that the proposed new driveway entrance on Douglas Drive will be a right in, right out driveway. Nelson asked how the r�quirern�nts in the Institutional zoning district compare to the requirements in the Commerc�al zaning district. Hogeboom stated that the requirements in the Institutional zoning district are stricter because they are usually located in residential areas. Johnson asked if the dimensions shown on the site plan are final. Hogeboom said he's not sure but he knows that Hennepin County does have the recanstruction of Douglas Drive in their 2015 Capital Improvement Plan so the constructions plans have been appraved but he believes that City will review the County's plans again before constructi�n begins. Johnson asked if the proposed new property lines are in sync with the Gounty's reconstruction plans. Hogeboom said he thinks the boundary of the road is an estimate at this time. Johnson asked about the setback requirements along the south property line. Hogeboom stated that the south property line along Duluth Street is considered to be a front yard. He explained that the requested variances are from the existing property lines, not the proposed new property lines. Minutes of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals December 19, 2012 Page 3 Nelson asked what the setback requirements would be alang the west property if it weren't a front yard. Hogeboom said it would depend on what zoning district the property abuts. Boudreau-Landis asked if all the variances requested are based on the location of the existing property lines. Hogeboom said yes. McCarty asked if the existing amount of parking is adequate. Hogeboom said that the proposed new plan meets the parking requirements. Tom Fournier, representing the applicant, said he greatly appreciat�s the s�tpport they've received from City staff. He stated that they have been considering chang�s to this building for a long time and that the issue with the existing building is the inability to make it a usable space while following ADA requirements because the building is solid granite. Nelson asked Fournier why they can't build the proposed new building in the same footprint. Fournier said the location proposed for the new bu�ilding warks best to accommodate the flow of traffic and parking. McCarty asked if the current amount of parking is'inadequate. Fournier said no. He added that there are times when there is more activi#y on the site but the parking has been adequate. Hageboom stated that they are proposing 59 parking spaces which is exactly the required amount of parking ba�ed on the Zoning Code requirement of 1 parking space per 3 seats in the main assembly area. Nelson asked Fournier ho�rJong they have owned the building. Fournier said they've owned it since 1957. McCarty asked Fourni�r w�t�t,,upgrades would be required to make the existing building usable. Fournier�tated tha�t`the main auditorium is on the upper level, the bathrooms are on the lower lever and there is a library/meeting room on the main level. He stated that an elevater is needed and it would be difficult to install an elevator in the current building becau�e the stairs are set diagonally. He stated that the heating system is inadequate and it would be difficult to insulate the walls because they are granite. Also, the existing windows are single pane glass. He also noted that the main auditorium space�%;is too srnall so the upper level would need to be expanded. He said that after considering all the costs of the necessary improvements it doesn't add up to keep the existing building. Johnson referred to the site plan and asked what other designs were considered and what the plans would look like if the building were moved further to the south in order to meet the setback requirement along the north property line. Fournier stated that parking was the main factor in moving the building further toward the north. He added that they - also would lose all the parking along the south property line and there wouldn't be room for the driveway or to turn around if the building were moved further to the south. Minutes of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals December 19, 2012 Page 4 Nelson questioned the impact on the homes to the north if the building is moved closer to the north property line. Maxwell asked why the proposed storage shed is external to the building. Fournier stated that the proposed shed could be moved to a conforming location if that is the Board's preference. Boudreau-Landis asked about the use of the proposed shed. Fournier said they would store their lawn mower and miscellaneous items in it. McCarty asked if there were other designs that tried to keep the building within the proper setbacks. Fournier said yes, but they did not meet the parking requirements. Johnson said it seems that there is an opportunity to shift everything to the south and to have the parking to the north behind the building. Fournier stated that their focus has been to design the building to meet the proposed new road design. McCarty said he would feel more comfortable approving a variance from the parking requirern�nts than for the proposed location of the building. He suggested requiring'� fence ar some sort of screening for the houses to the north. Nelson asked if the applicants need the number ofparking spaces they are proposing. Hogeboom noted that there will be no on-street parking available so the City would like to stress that this property needs to have enough parking spaces an their property. Nelson said she understands the reasons fc�r I�cating the proposed building further to the north and east but she is concert�ed because that is where the residential properties are located. Fournier stated that tl�te propc�sed building will be a single story building and it won't be taller than a standard home. Fournier stated that stormwater is also an issue and another reason the green area along the south is necessary. ;Ne added that with the Stormwater issues, the needs of the congregation and the restrictions with the proposed road construction, the plans being proposed will m�et their needs. Johnson said he wduld like to see other plans that show how shifting the building to the south would ;impact thre,pan�Cing, stormwater, etc. and he would also like to know more of the facts that are driving the applicants' decisions. Nelson asked about the time frame for construction of the new building. Fournier stated they v�ould like to start construction within one year of variance approvals. Fournier called Phil Vlasko, the architect for the project to help address the Board's questions and to discuss the alternate plans that were considered before this design. Vlasko stated that the best presentation of the building is the south. He stated that if the building were shifted toward the south property line than all of the activity of dropping people off and parking would happen closer to the residential neighbors to the north. Hogeboom noted that staff agreed that it would be good to keep the traffic circulation away from the residential areas. He added that staff has not received comments from any of the adjacent property owners. Minutes of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals December 19, 2012 Page 5 Vlasko stated that if the building were shifted further to the south if would also affect the parking and the green space and the traffic flow and the functioning of the carport. McGarty suggested not having a carport. Vlasko said their traditional Kingdom Halls have carports and he would rather move the building somehow. Fournier added that they have elderly and handicapped congregants that will really use the carport and reiterated that they don't generally build their buildings without carports because they are heavily used. Maxwell noted that the property will be smaller once the design of Dougl�s Drive ' changes. McCarty stated that the site is being reduced but the building is being expanded. He said he is not comfortable with the building being so �lose to the north property line. Nelson opened the public hearing. Seeing and hearing no one wishing to comment, Nelson closed the public hearing. Nelson said she is comfortable with a number of the fequested variances and with striking the variance for the storage shed, but it sounds like the Board agrees that the proposed building might be too close to the north property line. McCarty suggested tabling the applicants' request to allow them to came' up with a new design. Johnson agreed that it would be helpful to see otk��r alternatives. Fvurnier agreed to table their request. Nelson asked the applicant to giv� additional consideration and elaborate on the questions asked on the variance application. MOVED by Maxwell, seconded by Jahnson to table the applicants' request to the January 22, 2013 Board of Zdning;,Appeals meeting. McCarty expressed concern abvut reviewing multiple plans. He suggested that the applicants come bac�w�i�th one revised plan for the Board to consider. Maxwell said he thought it might be easier ta compare multiple plans. Johnsan said he would like to know what other options th� applicants have considered and justification for what they are asking. Fournier said he understands what the Board wants and will put together a couple of options to show the Board. The vote was unanimous to table the applicants' request to the January Board of Zon�ng Appeals mec�ting. III. Other Business Hogeboom stated that there are two vacancies on the Planning Commission and if any BZA members are interested in applying they should contact the City Manager's office. Minutes of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals December 19, 2012 Page 6 IV. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 8:22 pm. Nancy Nelson, Chair Joseph S. Hogeboom, Staff Liaisor� � , ��,; , �} C1��.} �)�, � � Planning Department 763-593-8095/763-593-8109(fax) Date: lanuary 17, 2013 To: Board 4f Zoning Appeals From: Joe Hogeboom, City Planner Subject: 309 Turnpike Rd. Dmitri Rebrov, Applicant Background Dmitri Rebrov, representing the owner of the property at 309 Turnpike Rd., is seeking variances from City Code to allow for the construction of a new house. The new house would be approximately 2,750 square feet in area. The proposal requires variances to allow the south side setback to remain at 12.5 feet despite the height of the corresponding side wall and to allow all four walls of the home to be constructed without architectural articulation. In 2009, a variance was approved that would have allowed for an addition of garage and living space to the north side of the home. This variance was not acted upon. Variance The proposal requires variances from the following section of City Code: � Section 11.21, Subd. 11(A)(3)(b) Side Yard Setback Requirements. City Code requires side yard setback areas to increase if the corresponding house wall is greater than 15 feet in height, The applicant is seeking a waiver to this requirement to allow the south side setback to remain 12.5 without regard to wall height. • Section 11.21, Subd. 11(A)(3�'d) Articulation Requirements. City Code requires walls on single family residential dwellings greater than 32 feet in length to articulate. The applicant is seeking a waiver to this requirement to allow all four proposed walls to be constructed without articulation. ��i►� �► wa �� — � 5dZ3 --..�,� , ,,, ,. �, 5d15 �5+0�5 " _ ` _"m---4�� ' ' ° ', > a °c � 53U1 � � _� � G�sra��crad Aue'. ^„'" 531 T �"�---,�. � '� 5 9 t�a 17' ? !��" �� ,. � 3U � `� �. , � � � � . . _. � .. ._� � �� S . � ° � 1 Q{i �� , �� a = 1fl1 �``.. � � 18i 10A � '`�•,,, �,!'' � 109 108 e � fi� '!Q9 '--...,,},,,''� � � r , 1fl9 112 � 7'17 118 /��"•-,��i"txtd �1 k = 117 2ad g 51$fl ��` 250 t 2fl1 2t10 � ! 11.5 "� � ��"` ��"3t12 ; / ,� " -� � 301 2nA � ` � /, � ��g �, .� ''�-�--_ r'� zl , � m ��9 Subject Property �� ,;�' �7�g � s�s 2�s � r � so�� ...__._��__.____�_____.T a� 319 308 � _ 31d c:al�ar�ia€Car cn i � -- ....___ ��1 327 �, �Q2 ------1 5221 5?11 5201 �i21 "�U2 40n 4flfl ( , i 400 � ; 5111 'i�1 � �[t9 � �t 4di1 � . �� r _.-. Tm__._. ; �,_ :�,, , , ' a�� 1 `t aos � a�a �to : sn� so� s�� szs )� / J � . sas � . :-f`^ 1 f�. \ �L / I'� �� .� w , Lt�trrt�Ci�Y@ �d ..a ,,,,,-"- �#11 1 -" � "°^ �' + � �� ' �f R1�$ � ` �"'�,,� ''�54i - ti... � ,.'.� ��_..-�'" ��.�`,� � . .,. ,.. _ . .. ,, ... _ . � ., .� M.. � � �, � �"' fr25 .•% ` ,� � ��~ '^. �..�---�`�`' ��5 � fl �5�� 548 516 \. �'�. :' ` ..,, '�`'' 5A9 x � lt\ �'�' � 9 1 �\� 4 �� ll��— } 0 � 50fl ~'�A"�.,�, 535 C�` S76 ' BtiO �._�..--�--'. £ � l 0 832 824 616 g 601 i \ ��,�_..._._ � � �. � � � 8�1 ��1 �, "~ ...R�dEs�se�nR+�- � ��. .. ��. �. �.. .« ,� � ��, 6d18 � �5 44 � � �� ` � j t �7� � �` B171 811 621 d37 633 629 835 " ��`"--�,._.,.�-"_.. ��U 7t11 -� � �� -� � a� �� `..* J,^ , �, 621 1� B 13 '� Bt19 �� 721 �� 617 5 ` , t � 1 _� . ....s � � 1�--^--'. � ....�.............�....5�..,..�..�...T__ ,...�.., __..--�----........�"1^'�__� — 1 1 � j r �, i , , ;` �t `� { � 1 !� r s+w�«,��.=4<aas� � �n�:;r�mc�,�,��as z�cs Sd2fl � S41t1 � �3#1G �� 6320 � `�310 cr �'�rs 1 Zoning Code Variance Application 1 . Street address: 309 Turnpike Rd. 2. Applicant Information: Name; Dmitri Rebrov Address: 3125 Lee Ave N Golden Valley, MN 55422 Email Address: rebrov(«�gmail.com Phone: 763-587-0655 3. Provide a detailed description of the variance(s) being requested We are designing a house for a family of four—two parents and two kids, ages 4 and 6. We want to build a house with a lot of light for the every member of the family, sufficient storage space and extra room for frequent visits by the extended family. This requires us to build a two story house. We'd like to build a modern, green and energy efficient house. We also want it to be cost effective in construction and in use. Working with several architects and builders we came to a design that satisfies these core requirements and also looks appealing from outside, enhancing the look for the neighborhood, and provides a happy and efficient living space for our family. In order to do this we ask for three variances: 'I. Combine all allowed accessory space under one roof to build a 1000 sq/ft attached garage. 2. Omit articulation of the side walls of the house. 3. Reduce side offset on the south side. 4. Provide a detailed description of need for a variance from the Zoning Code, including: � Description of building(s) • Description of proposed addition(s) .1, • Description of proposed alteration(s) to property New construction, single familytwo story house. 5. Minnesota State Statute 462.357 requires that a property exhibit "practical difficulties" in order for a variance to be considered. Practical Difficulties: • result in a use that is reasonable. • are based on a problem that is unique to the property. • are not caused by the landowner. • do not alter the essential character of the locality. To demonstrate how your request will comply with Minnesota State Statute 462.357, please respond to the following questions: Explain the need for your variance request and how it will result in a reasonable use of the property 1. Garage We would like to stay in this house and in the neighborhood for a long time and expect that our kids will stay with us while going to college and possibly later, depending on their financial situation. We also expect to take care of our parents at some point when they begin to age. We also have a large extended family that lives in other states and countries and frequently visits us for extended periods of time. They either come in or rent a car when they visit so they also need to park their car. This is why we feel we need to build a large garage, that would allow parking not just our cars but also cars for our kids, for our parents and for our visitors. fn addition, we lead active lives so we have bikes, skis, sleds and other sport equipment for the four of us, which takes a lot of garage space, in addition to the traditional lawn mower, snow blower and other yard equipment. Having a separate space for all of this equipment makes it very inconvenient and we are afraid that unless there is a designated space with easy access from the house for all of it, it will end up pushing the cars out of the garage, which is what typically happens with small garages. And of course, parking cars outside in our Minnesota winters can needlessly complicate busy lives for us and our kids so we'd like to avoid that. 2. Articulation of the side walls of the house The two story house we designed very tightly fits into allowed side offsets. If we try to move the offset inside the house, it reduces the usability of the garage. If we build the offset to the outside, it would require making the house more narrow, while it is narrow already. Making the house even more narrow would require us to move entrance to the side of the house, which would make the flow of the house much less efficient, the layout less logical and would also make the house look less neighborhood friendly. In the house we are designing, the lack of articulation of the side 2. walls will be compensated by other architectural details, which would visually break up the long walls and create aesthetically appealing view for the neighbors. 3. Reducing offset on the south side of the proposed house by 3 feet from required. We'd like to move the house as far as possible for the neighbor on the north side, because our houses will be on the same level so it would increase privacy for both of us. We would also block less sun for this neighbor. Getting closer to the neighbor on the south side is desirable because their house sits (ower with a garage facing north so it would not have an impact on them in a negative way and would not reduce our privacy either. Explain how, if granted, the proposed variance will not alter the essential character of your neighborhood and Golden Valley as a whole. The neighborhood, where we are building our house has a variety of different houses: traditional small houses built in the 40's and 50s and bigger modern houses, built much more recently. The homes have different styles, colors, feels and looks, so we feel that the addition of our new modern looking house would be a good fit for an already diverse street. The variances that we are applying for will not be noticeable or alter the neighborhood: • Garage will only have a two car door facing the street and w�71 look like many other houses on the street. • The reduced o$set would not be noticeable due to the positioning ofthe house to the south(lower with a blind garage wall to the north) • The lack of the articulation of the side wall wi71 be compensated by other architectural elements. 6. The City requests that you consider all available project options that are permitted by the Zoning Code prior to requesting a variance. The Board of Zoning Appeals will discuss alternative options to seeking variance with you at the public hearing. Please describe alternate ways to do your project that do not require variances to the Zoning Code. We feel that there are no good feasible options to design a house that satisfies our needs without the variances we are asking for. We have worked with an architect and builders through numerous design approaches and the one we are proposing is the best possible option. 7. Please submit a current survey of your property. You must indicate the proposed addition, including new proposed building and structure setbacks, on the survey. A copy of Golden Valley's survey requirements is available upon request. Please note that this application is considered incomplete without the submittal of a current property 3 , survey. 8. Please submit at least one current color photograph of the area affected by the proposed variance. You may attach a printed photograph to this application, or you may email a digital image to planning[a�goldenvalleymn.gov. You may submit additional photographs as needed. To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct. I also understand that unless construction of the action applicable to this variance request, if granted, is not taken within one year, the variance expires. I have considered all options afforded to me through the City's Zoning Code, and feel that there is no alternate way to achieve my objective except to seek a variance to zoning rules and regulations. I give permission for Golden Valley staff, as well as members of the Board of Zoning Appeals, to enter my property prior to the public he ring to inspect the area affected by this request. Signature of pplicant If the applicant is not the owner of all property involved in this application, please name the owner of this property: Green Grass Properties, LLC Print Name of owner Signatur of owner v $150 Application Fee Attached (for Single Family Residential) $250 Application Fee Attached (for all other Zoning Districts) Please note: The City of Golden Valley will send notice of your variance request to all adjoining property owners as well as owners of properties directly across streets or alleys. Your neighbors have the right to address the Board of Zoning Appeals at your public hearing. You are advised to �I', N � 4 J O cp � W � m ? m � � .� O � OU� � UZ � Q � � � U LL � Q � � � '� U � N � � = � p � FpZ � � � � � � � u. � 0} zw� pp " ° N � Z �I ( �=o �w > o � > °- � Wmz a Z o L � f p w� � W � Zp � WQU � ¢ � � z O � p .-. o��= � u�jWZC�n � W � WO W � r' c0 � d g m f- w � W � W ~ ��1- � � � � W �W = p}p �' � J � � � _ I— o � � z J � �n i,.. w w o = � � �, Q �. O n- cn cn Q � Z � w 0 � � Q �� jUi- W = � � � ° � � � � Q � o ? � m � J W I- J Z F- w�p f- (nw � -i Z (nw ¢ W a` N _ � (n � M J � � � O . � U � W �- � � ` � Z W w ��U1 O Qm � ¢ ? � O � LL1F" p �i �''A � . � Q F- . N � l.� � J U J W � ~ Z� Z Q z � 1- W � (n Cn W � � � F- �.' f- W � O a m � W ++ — � w 00 � Z. W � � � � J Z W W � W Y Z (~!I Q W �W Q O � _ � � � Q � W � d � } d" U � d -� J Z Z J � N Q W �' � J Z O � LX �� Z � (n W � m � � W � O Z W = I- aX � Ol,_ �n � t� OWv o (n - � � � � � � UwW � � Ypcnw �- o J000 � >- cn�C� � cnO � OVO � zLL � �n Z 3 U p O • z a N a Q w Y � � t-- o Z Z � 0 z c) a � o Z w � � J �c�?�. � 1= a � j � Q ¢O � co ¢ w U � I- � 0 \U p J Q Z Q � Z Z J � '""i � 2 � � O� � �'� � Q 1- �Y ~ U' C7 Q � W W Q W� � � � U � r- v � � °�° N a z � ¢ Z cn ° ``' c� � z = I v' � � �,,_.�i-c� �- zi= � acn = W � � � az o � ¢ v w w w ¢ a c�Q cn F- w o O W � O.O W X �' O ~' �W 2 Z W � J � Q U' � W J �. W l n [p � � W Z �-' � � J Q J _ li (n � m J (n W O U �] � U L� � I- W O � J Q � d C""� ��N�I- � L�j�j � O � Q O � �O }S U a N H H d Iw- Fw- H � I-w- fW- F- H I- I-w- IW- � I-w- FW- Fw-- H � � H U� (n II �O� � W Z � � W � Q W � W Z Q � rn O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ~ �� Q � = Z = � X \ � Z Z � Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z �� Z W � � � O J U � F" Q �" W W N W � w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w U� �p Q V � � � - UOZ � F- � z Q o 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o Z ��in � � �- ZO � >- � >' � � �' � w .. I � i ,_.._, � UWO � a � zQLLCn � a o Z � a, Q � � ma � w � � ? gc� zW ? o z U �� I � � � ° �� o�� " �� r-a--� zu�`'i E-� Wpp � X = c~nu�i � � aZ � o W I � �� evv � oo � � ZZC�nWwwH > O � a 3 m � i \ I I � N 2 Z � c�i c*i �t W � � �- I I �O � � � I � � I o r <r U+' � � � I I � o z �a o � c.D p � c � � w � I .., I :_: _� W a > �� . . i-' O d'. � � W � � � W I I O � T T �"'q �� 0 M C�9 w � � (W/d)00'OS 3„l0, S.00S � o r-i z� � z � ��/aq6� � � � Z O � —��_ _— — r , � C Q ......_.�.... ..........__. — — V �� ..........,__ �— r / �i } m U as (W) L8'9 � � _ � W � o O O � /�998' � // I t0 � ^ .1 U j � 2 H U � � I 99�� f I �C N � � O � � / I m �\ \ � ��1 m O /� / J M �'4 c} (!1 � ` , � �� I // �/ I � LJ � C V1 I O ��$� I N / T � O•� < � \ � / � � � . F-� -i� � _ ^ / � ;' , o u°� � Y_ � . _w ': i � d r----- ---------� 41� i' Sz �_i `�' I � � ��j w� � � —;_i � /� I ��-----�I� �"� yo � � �o� � �� I / �y- rk' a o - �� a � -� , ,. i i o - :., ��, ,. �� o � � us �" � � / .. >� NI ' T ( �n I `� �, \ ,� , � � �,� w �- i i a �� Wo � ; � �" �� -�'. , m o � Z� � I � o 0 � � I � � `\ "�~' j `\ � — — — — �� o g a w � 3 � � ` ,� I ��- �� I � j G� �= `�''�� I �3 �a`no�n mZ � o `n � � -..1 �� I � �o �u-i�ri W� �` N D � �'Zt I � C? \�\ � �' F� N�r- a o ..,� °z T � I .;: �0 I � � I;- ��' `a �; V .-- Q N � � O�v� \� I � W 3 0�� I � � . � .� a � ` � U � . � >g �'�` � . � N 1 s F I � � �a�� v� /%\\ e} I �'� ` , '',, `�\� I � �:= � ��i »,,, � �y ( /�� Y � � `` n 1 1 � � cn �� / �� 1 .� ^ � � qJ � I ' 6605 � � 1 I\ � � �o � � '"-�� r� , � �Q� �4 �'y� �� i �.,� F� �..1� � i� �� ;� z�.°�� : � �,.,�� 5�z� �� i i �� Q� �a I Z ii �� .� � i ii � i Z p � Q }a W X i .�' -° w°= �,.£....�" i i i i , X= � �o� =o � �ZfS.•. o L 1 I � � Q Z J Z _7Q' j '� I \o� i �/� �i��o.0£l,�i / � � i � XOX v � - � xw�w ,� q , —� � f ;e�t ,� , �/ � T I i � `` N N � � � r' � � I o� � � .-. � �/;� I _ � � o., '� I __��a m� � t°w, o � � � . . ' �_----o / 1 r � � � M ,�^ \ / :so �.��: � M rn ° o��, � � . c� �� E "Nd � � 1 / M.�: I �- tn� � � � �N� / N ��b � I ��J � �y� . � W �L t�(�\ . .09A/ -_—_____-7--�'� q � �/ l l � � �� q� � �M n,d. � — -i- — —1 �d� 08 (W) 8Z_08 _ �1 _ 93_ �— —��i .'- �� n L ��-—89z— L)00 SL M„9�b,�S.Q9A1——�� B9`' � � �� X� � ---- _�� 990�� zcn z ��m -�_ssi- - --------- �� 'T' 0 2 in �°0 3 ------- / � � ~c~D �"n N E s�, �� o / � / �� W �- Z o`� E m M 0� ��e9� Im � p w CD�N W N�^d _ �� o�� - - o Q� �xla��nz -' W �� w� �, � c� ��m �; �u._ ' W �� W �oa Z U w �i O�J �� I � �Q�Y ��' '� i �� — — — — — — — — — — — — — W ��Q � �j W 5�.. ��' � �... �,.,. t"1�� t�� Planning Deparfiment 763-593-8095/763-593-8109(fax) Date: January 17, 2013 To: Board of Zoning Appeals From: Joe Hogeboom, City Planner Subject: 141Q Tyrol Tr. Timbercraft Remodeling, Applicant Background Peter Murlowski of Timbercraft Remodeling, representing the owners of the property at 1410 Tyrol Tr., is seeking a variance from City Code to allow for the construction of a second story addition. tn September, 2012, a variance was granted to allow for a second story addition to be built to within 9.5 feet of the west property line. Upon completion of building plans, it was discovered that a portion of the roof at the northeast corner of the home would exceed the height atlowed by City Code. Variance The proposal requires a variance from the following section of City Code: • Section 11.21, Subd. 11(B) Height Limitations. City Code requires that the height of flat roof homQS not exceed 25 feet along street-facing facades. The applicant is requesting a variance af 2.5 feet to allow far a total building height af 27.5 feet. TM.. �,m .� .M . W _ _. �. � ,� . . _.. �o�. �� _� � _. _ _. � .,� ,.� m. ,� s �_�e�,r��r�a_, ._ we v ._. e � � _ -�-�--.---�.�,��..�...� � .. . ._ m� .._ � ��r .�_ _.. _.. .,. _. � 130di � � 4i21 �197 4111 � � A� r, 41U1 4i115 �€!07 "`--�� a A31�1 €� �, ', �. ''� ' `"�-„�. �. f� �� E� 1341 13S}7 ...._....__ �' � ,., 130+4 � f � �.� �._ r' ! ^, l � '�,. �'�� .�' 1324 � � � 1308`�. '� E I�—�-- �__: \ �` '. f i ��'�r€�6Cra�t' = 1515 134�1 �'�� .� t+ 132�D � � y ,r� 13�7 � �( 13i2 � �,�' p ' � i °-ti � g �� 1 r' _ y S ' ,,- �� Y' 1 � ��2s � ��, r ��t� /-'� ��f,,, . � �.- --��`- ,� � �315 � 13��i � >.,`�-,,�+ � / ^ � ,.''',� 13�i�9 `�.�°�`,, i�fl� $ ."*�5,� r•....� J' � �,*.. 9 � ; -.>., wm�,�_y�. �. .t 1311 � a', —'"�15 5outh Tytert Pswtd /� `t, .� t_-r'- �yffil_ { € .,.'+P�i',�dkJE �* \ � % ,� :, � 1 � t , ° � } '� � 1315 � � � CA `Y�'f. °`� � Subject Property , ; �" �3��, �`� ._'"�,g �,��,_ -- ,-r �° �� , >> � �� ,:�, , _� ` ,,` r �� .. � ; ., ��. ,. ��tvr ,� -'1� ' . �. .� � 1319,. r':.''"'�� 14d5 � i�•p�l `�� 'i•3U4 �5'J �l, 1d39 � 'ti '�,�,t � � _,m.� � � ,,- ,�a t � u �,��' . ;i � _.. _ ,, � 141C� � 14i5 ~--= r'r r�' '`t �y �',ti 1435 �.r ��_�_.._ _-, � ~ _,_�r' ¢, 1�4�18 �_. 'ti 9 429 �t - as2s �,` � � , �,� � �� '� �a��t 1, �'t✓ . �` ! � w --�--,-_ ,. �___� �: +ti - �, �___. � ' M-.- ""^ �.M1, ; : ` . 1 "'~ 1 `� '��$$ �...�- b� t � � ----...___ � �'; _ , 1 _ "4,�t �,: S` i ,�-._,,._ ; -�--_._-�r , � �so�r _ -----�--� ,:°�a�p ,� �' � I ,s7, I _ _ _. :.,_ � u� � 1415 ( I �-_ __ �y,/ � "' _.--"� r 1507 .,,� ,q;' 'f d3'! -_"``•-..- �� ---,_ " 1�- � � ��t ,' �`"...,.�_� �,� 1416 � 1515 1414 w t ., 1A�Qtl � � ........ ``- 1�25 _-.-.-____ �� ```- '�� f�, /;1.... 1501 4 151� �~''`--� 1S'�� 15i5 f. � r .�1' � ' 1�09 ' g y`j` ! f -�"�. � � ,' �Y 1 �431� j' a �''-..,� j 1d20 � ,,,,-'`" �w�" � ...'` .., � � �,�_.�.,-�"' 1531 � � ,.7 r 15tI8 ``_... ,/ �� A.,. � � A�1Q ' �~�`"^�,.�'` s� 1439 ° r J .,S` r � r � �.,y ' x � � , �� ..,~..,� �;%,� ��j�''�-•,^ ,r� SS�ru�h 7yro!P�rk � ' "`'� . ,'� � � �� `�_�__,-�._,. � �-�'� `� `''�, ° '-L.-; �� ' /' 15r��f �� d�-.__�__ -.�C��(�� •�� \t� /' " . __.,-'� ��`^*.J` � ��r"-."-�'� 15.t5 � �� '1500 �,f�\ ,4 ` 14� � �`-".`'�--�,...� ,{ 9 522 4325 4315 `�`��`�� '�� 1527 �� 1 51 ,`, i f• � '�,_.-�.—.-.,.-`,r ��` � !,I.r.�r,��na+a�i r .cNl�:;� wr�'��i ::.k�rt3i.�+5�;1,:t; ?' 2:1"21i city of oZder� va e - Zoning Code Variance Appiication 1. Street address: 1410 Tvro1 Trai) 2. Applicant Information: Name: Timbercraft remodeling Address: 388 Cleveland Ave SW New Brighton, MN 55112 Email Address: Pete� timbercraftremodelin�.com Phone Number: 651-633-8611 3. Provide a detailed description of the variance(s) being requested: _Adding a second story on to an existing rambler and requesting a variance for the hei�ht on a partial section of the roof. 4. Provide a detailed description of need for a variance from the Zoning Code, including: • Description of building(s) • Description of proposed addition(s} • Description of proposed alteration(s)to property The existing house is a 3 bedraom rambler,we are adding a second stary addition to include a master suite with master bedroom and an addition workout room.We are proposing to have a section of the master bedroom room to be 2 ft higher than the rest of the raof.This will greatly imprave the exterior look of the home. Instead of a simple plain roaf line,the proposed roof line adds dimension and curb appeal without negatively impacting any of the adjacent views. 5. Minnesota State Statute 462.357 requires that a property exhibit "practical difficulties" in order for a variance to be considered. Practical Difficulties: • result in a use that is reasonable. • are based on a problem that is unique to the property. • are not caused by the landowner. • do not alter the essential character of the lacality. To demonstrate how yaur request will comply with Minnesota State Statute 452.357, please respond to the following questians: Explain the need for your variance request and how it will result in a reasonable use of the property. The roof section is higher than code will allow. Without the variance we will be forced to eliminate this 2 ft elevation in the master bedroom. Leaving us with a far less appealing roof line. What is unique abou#your properry and how do you feel that it necessitates a variance? All of the homes in this neighborhood are unique in architectural design.This hame is quite bland. We are attempting to make it into a midcentury modern design. Withaut the elevated section of the roof,the design will not give us the look we are going for. Explain how the need for a variance is based on circumstances that are not a result of a landowner action. The home as it sits is in dire need of updating and repairs in arder to maintain the consistency of the neighborhood. The proposed project allows for this while achieving the desi�n objectives we desire ' Explain how, if granted,the proposed variance will not alter the essential character of your neighborhood and Golden Valley as a whole. The addition as proposed wilf greatly improve the appearance of the home.As it sits now, it appears to be a disjointed, added anto structure.The remadel project will make the home flow architecturally and yet keep the theme of the design. 6. The City requests that you consider all available praject options that are permitted by the Zoning Code prior to requesting a variance.The Board of Zoning Appeals will discuss alternative options to seeking variance with you at the public hearing. Please describe alternate ways to do your project that do not require variances to the 2oning Code. Simply put, the roof line will have a borin�look withaut the elevated section 7. Please submit a current survey of your property. You must indicate the proposed addition, including new proposed building and structure setbacks, on the survey. A copy of Golden Valley's survey requirements is available upon request. Please note that this application is considered incomplete without the submittal of a current proper#y survey. 8. Please submit at least ane current color photograph of the area affected by the proposed variance. Yau may attach a printed photograph to this application, or you may email a digital image to plannin�@�oldenvallevmn.�ov. You may submit additional photographs as needed. To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct. I also understand that unless construction of the action applitable to this variance request, if granted, is not taken within one year,the variance expires. I have considered all options afforded to me throu�h the City's Zoning Code, and feel that there is no alternate way to achieve my objective except to seek a variante to zoning rules and re�ulations. I give permission for Golden Valley staff,as well as members of the Board of Zoning Appeals,to enter my property prior to the public hearing to inspect the area affected by thls request. � � l' �-._._ �„ ��-.l Si at of Applicant If the applicant is not the owner af all property involved in this application, please name the owner of this property: �a � � �, s �1� � '� 1 Print Name of owner Sig ture of owner $150 Application Fee Attached (for Sing(e Family Residential) $250 Application Fee Attached (for all other Zoning Districtsj Piease note: The City of Golden Valley wi!/send notice of your variance request to atl adjoining property owners as well as owners of properties directly across streets or alleys. Your neighbors have the right ta address the Board of Zoning Appeals at your public hear/ng. You are advised to personaily contact your neighbors and exp/ain your project to them prior to the public hearing. Bing Maps Page 1 of 1 Pnnt this page in a more readable formaY.Click Print next to the uppervnght comer of the map. � -� ' ' r�. a c r T.ha nry ta _ . :� ,,;� �r:.,» . �g' ,., .�� . � ,r � . �. � � . . at,e�� . +i! v i. .� �'� `�`' �� '�� • B �`^" � 3 .l ``��+, b� %4 � 0. �� 2t` � � �`v ? ,�w Y�Y' �,� .... � . �� t' > =�? :� ry {j7.. ,.�s 1� � 3. �'S.. � ��y, . � ,�� ,� �. .. _..,�. .�. �n.� y��'i �`'��. F � r.x , �w_. .,.. . � � ._... �.. � <.. . �� . � ' .x«,�e�<- ��°� 's ��.�: ��": C� � � �'�. ��I. �' A �' .,a,� '�� 1' � �T=�:' . ; d: . , , .,. �.,e ' '� . y ,_ t � t .... ;.�- , �; ' r �w� � „ , fl A y a n � i r �. � ��. t N,�i ! �� .�. " . u �w y ii �' � ��a�. �� , � , a. �� .� �� o �, , �. . � o <: � a ' ��; � , �� i, t � � ��°°�� d � � �� ;y �e � �. � � � � �� ix 3 ; �a� '�v k ;a C � + �� v� �p� °� �y 9 '��' � � � A� �� aF. �' � , �F��. ., � �"�"�'i��`m� � w� 3 `�W "�r " ;"�' `�� -. '��'�°'� �.�'. i s�,� . � �6�; p�� . �� i' �� r . � ;'� ,,i} � � .: � � m,.; � . v .,�� „r t"4 � ��' � x � � #-: e��< H � �.. �,e` hd"�' � :3E' $^ �, L P �d . "iru��'� ' I �� ^ �� a� � � � y :.� � ��. 9 �,� � � .� � . ° ��,` �� ' �,�� ._t ��+�� .t ��} � � �:. , .� �.w�� "�e:, � . r � � � '� '�" ' . S:{ g k= r� } -Y. ��. �� , g �� "y . L rt F � ��;'�� Qn re� � ;� ar�a� � ��si � �.�tu A ..u�.,.., � ..� �� . �',�� .x�, _.,� .� http://www.bing.com/maps/ 1/10/2013 Bing Maps Page 1 of 1 Print this page in a more readable forma4 Click Pnnt next to ihe upper-rigM corner of ihe map. �' i� � , � ��d��„� �,; , � : ✓ � � � �� k� �� 0� �� qta�� , � s � � . � p �,� ,v°, �, ..'S^�t 7j¢: 't 1 i � \ �� . .v � ` � � � � �>.. � � , �,� � . "" � � r Y — ;. a . � � � : w��°`� ` � � e , a . � � . � . _. � � � �. . , �°�� r � �,34.�,� � � � °� ��°_°� �� " � � �,K� �� : ��a ' F�, � , . ��. _ �: � ,:�� liw�; ,. �� uu � � �� `� �,i i� v � �iu � �' � ,; �:uk ��.�� . e�� 3�� ;a�, ��x',�� . ":� � � � � � �� . �. '�4`4 a �� ' �e �e a �� ° �� . �e: ��9.��s � . � � � � � ,.� , _'�. 3`"�� W ��`�d'��°� �7�� i£ � . .;� � � � s� a i �'� z�� i9 �� :� ;�a ., � �._ �... �� a. u�C :; e .' c � aa� � ��i .�. $ � ° i li r �� .� � i � � �� { � .� � �� 6 �� i� �� . � 4�.. ' , . � � �l;.b � �N �� \ ��h�� k... � � I�1 �. Ti �a �.��"'` ��(�� G��I��I . � . ��:� �� x` i ; � "� � �� ` � � <�F �'��.� �` ,°°�� . '\, � yi ��Y„�� 5. ��' � � �v � � z p �� . �, 6 � ?i�� . �h� � � �� q �� ,�*� �*� a .��^ �� s��+a "a^.�'�°�a v� � � s +. ,`1��a�a. ��y � �� a �� . � s��°�t�' ° . �� , � �,r ,a�� a°.�' '� ,� �� , . ;� � � � e �� i�� . ��j s, � �ax + � a � F � � r�. � � �. �S* �r Fa..:� n ' . � . �y� \� ��ID v `y � �'., �„ . a . . .. . ` �q� � g0 . . '�'.� . � � � • �.�.m.�,ie`��"�A . ... � �i�«.v �.��,. ,�� \ � �zoiaMR�,onco�w..o� � . . . � ^ad��!�� ev�sry�niirful�eggi� ,. . . . ..� �: ... .. http://www.bing.com/maps/ 1/10/2013 Bing Maps Page 1 of 1 Pnnt this page in a mora readable formaC Click Print next to the upper-nght comer of the map. " RIfC�S PVP,�[!P ..� I�CIR�P({y p�� ' � �� ,��t.a '`°" "' g.... � ��s' ;dt wRg. :.'""w�'Jn��ry�,�q��'.Y�.' � rt�, � .,a � . .�v �j. ....k � .., �� 1 'qs �!1"'k�' $ � r 7 . '��: �. �� . , a Q 4 x i� � , � � r ! e b bs `�° � ."�� aa::... x. �rs '�.� �..� ... . . ... ,.• -.: ��i . � � � a i � . � a,s � � s • *^+� a � ,- .� � �'S' ..:'�y s; ,e �r � "'q . � 4 '� � q,��'� ��l � ` ' �, � X i7 �'4 �a'�� . �n? I �. �.. � �°�� °� .'�� 't qq .i�;h � ( � �.-°,,., . ' „p ] �`i` , �f { � � , �' �� i; a P.dy� �� r ��°�, � �� "'v .: ��e�. �`. wit>�,µ 't�=:� < � b ,.> ,� �„w.l.. ��lo ^;.� �� ,. � � � �i �� r�x� ,� � ��.q'�� 'a ��1 �qp a�� \�� ° ��'c .,��w,a . ,.wv � a+: � � � ��1� i�'�3 :� i t � `� � e� �� ".s' '�,�na� � � y�� ,�w � �� q i.� o `�.� '�� ' �� q, ; � a c � � �',yi� a°�� I�rc�i� �� I�N��p� , � � "a .,� � `��i�� y-li ��Q ��`` � �� h��a`�� E6�;� P w�� i a�, �*�� s +� � n e �. �hti��"��..� a�� m.e ' � �,,, ��. '�� r��''�' �� v, . '� . � ,�"��aa'' �ae� 0' �� . ��s+g:�:� �� * ` �6��'h;�q�� a��a�" �` o �m��*�7� ��v� v��,. ��>% � �� _ r� ��r °� �»�'t�s�� . � j .a4 w� n a .� f �� . ,rt� r �m a� yt .��,�*� � �,:�.� ��a,�^" �� " ��u �� ' ��" �� a �� r ��v � � ��"�� :� � � � �: -�� ,� �� ry �"��"� , � , �� '� � ��" �� i � � , � � ,�' ,: � � �€ s�y� � e: ��a��i� �� L``��.. ��°`�� n �."�� ? ��'�,�"��° '�� a, � . � � �� e�:�3� ' � i �� e�� a�� ,v,�s i c '�`�"� � i u � � VA� �: p �.,ue�� `�. ��rt ,. �a ti. y � �� N � 1� �° ��,�!„ u��AA ,,�;.�r..� }'�'.. �� .�� iil�Diii dl' i� ��-� �4.� ��, i F�� , ., �'iw�i �li�h!!I� �� , ., �s �_ ��S �,��,A��: � �� , , - ,.: " � ��..aF � �.�g�t^i '�'�) �v ' "e: ��' �..., '..., y��,c� �� y�, 9� ' ��1�,� �'. y� ��i� o lA��j��'a�� ': �'�� .��' "��a?» (�� `�I F� ��'��oa �p �` �y �� @ i�� '�� i i ;M '. ��° � ��` v� � � ( \.A�3 �, 3 x�.l�� t. � ' ��. . �� 4 a4" "� �n'��+ F��. v� a . � �'n �k' � f � . A�"�" �a05^ '`a . - g�� a u°b �� 2 �� ^� � �� ° � �� ,� �s� � � � �� a, � �y,� ��,V� ,�nR� � .; �� a� \ u �, � -�� `� ,�c .. c 2� a� �+ �� a� � `i�� a��'� ��' � .�.�� '� � �` � ' � � � �� x �� 0�7�. � ? �� ^ � � . ,� � � � � � p � � � a� �. � �� i .: s f�. � �.� � � ��a�`� ��' �Ne�� . 3 ��a�W��,�� ..�:. �M,� � ; �tiw a�'�,a„ ,., 3�. �� „�y �N�i >� � .�� 7n17 MicrosoR�Carporetio� � .. . . . � ( n �r.vecY I Ad Inlo��egel� � . � .. �. .� �<. .. . � �I"'e.,w.a.n .. . http://www.bing.com/maps/ 1/10/2013 Bing Maps Page 1 of 1 Pnnt this page in a more readable formaL Click Print next to the upper-riqht corner of the map. � : � � . . „ . ,,. .. . . . . �.: ��`� ,;z�. . .. i { � �� q,��'"�� k\ 0� � r � i � � � �i['�. b�� #3 i F�i' k � `/ ��7 �p,. �7� ` � (� � �� A�� i�� °r��p '� $4. Y � � � v�ia � � .�� ' � ` � �� .�� I �}9�6 �. : a h`" a. � y ''� ' ,� .k+ � " }f d � c';�`R� �w� . �'E " m � � � � ° � ' � � 5;,.�1€� � 1�'�`s��a�. �' �m�j �f�,^ �� ,w.;� ,iV�S�. � �e.�� ;v �� tP �f7 � . . � ° "� y� s- a , �_ �� ' �� i � .. � „ �ila;�� d9 i M � �t IPo k��i�w�i`��i�,��}. � � , � R,§�� ? ' ' i Ni�i C . ��,u��ii��i�i i� �ii�i��i . � �� R4� � ��„i (�p�h� ��'�� A � � �� . `� iS�`' .� � � v. �'4 4�S� �. , ��' .�,�: � � � it� � ; . i�;�,.`��i�k{�ry�i� �t,;R�l'�}°i�il�� l��i�f��.�t��}` '��; i °r�y�"'�� „ .,�`��. ; �,_ �� . ��' � .. � . ..� . �� i � u�� . �1�/�. � ��r �� a `� � � � 3�Vf�\�� i�� 9d��y . � � r - n .,��h � � � »' ��g9 I ii ��a�� i !� —��ti' � � ` m� ��" , . � � . . *� a �� , �➢�, PN i a�»� � � �: ��+„�'�'�� i�k��ti'�`� � � '�� % � �� "`� :, k.�x.� ��bQ`S'��S„'�� , ��P9`��d `��1`� �"�`��e� `a"_' ,,.�: ` � � � � ,�:, � k � �' �� +�'�5+°� �`'� ��°"^,"'� _•k�e.+„�+y°v�3'�^`� * \Y `a a :;Y» �� u � „ �'I(,�;�I I �� ` a �� ` b �e e°'� ��'��a �u+ � � �,f'� �(�.n, ,� . sa�`�'�� ,p� � �s4�'�.,� � �`.Z.�k '�^-��,�� t n�„. �} y��I �I�i'I��I'i"" . ih i ��,pv \ A W \��`�'"!� �� .\\\a 1 1@, �'..� ��.'�m��1 4�`* �� F r�� ;��q�S � ,. '�� w�(� a�e��y�� . �� , �� ¢ it�t F � r .� a:d ��, � n�� Y �� y � � a �t � u �� ; �. „ � � ��e � � ��.� " • ' .� a�, ^�+� t � t "� � �� '�'�,.,a4 � � ... � �� a �i�� .: � ;� '�i � ��'te. �� i�'`��a3�� ;;�.� �x ��V�v�� v �� V0�� „°',��ck � t ��g �� l a � c� �a V��ff� �.�t � � �� . � ,. �� Y�� °V� ��d, � � � � y � ��\a ••� a ,��'� �'�x . �� ` .� � �\ �C8 y� ��y�a��g; �i,�'^ � � \2�i „"� ±,z�,.:: ��b a\ : �A^-�'�� g �\ � ,�t r �� ^.'rs �*=`� ya�� Y a�M�� 3 �� :.� � � �� 9� a� y� °� ,�3 a �� .; � � <. + �`, � � � a��,`�� A � � � �,Y,�'�'�� ,��: ^� ��`.t� �'F� �.,� �R�" �z aa�� ' " s. 3 a. �y,a� ° .� � k � � .uv � �� . ��. � . ��a��'� � �`�,p .�v M �� ,a � :. , „�:: � ` : ; ; » ��: �� ka ��ei Q ez�t. �co �on .. � �a.�.�..a��..�- �� 's.� .'.s� . s .., �,'4�vwnea, �c.�,u�a�. . ., ai . .�.�.. . �'�.wB.rGS.� http://www.bing.com/maps/ 1/10/2013 � :::::::::: ��I � , . - • c�:�a�::«c��l _ .��.�... .... _I • I �I'lll'I�'I' � �� II�I �iiui Iflilllll ,.... .!�!�� ,-; I��►l ■■ - �IIIIIII IIIII� �--�� 11111 uuuu� III�IIIIIIII I ■■ �� , ■■�� - � IIIIII�II � ■��I _ IIIIIIII � � � �� I iiiiiii�ii �I _ � ....., IIIIIII -- �I f��I �� :; fllllil I �� '�: �� I illl � �� { ::: ,�,� 1 �-- ,�� i ; ��u��u��r ,....w...�....� �Il uin��riiiiiu�iiiiif '' ` -� � � � � � � ��u�� 'li� u�uamiuuauui ' . � ' � � ........... .., ,.,,,,,�„ : F , �II!�: IIC�:�:..�-;�I�1 ��u�� iiii�iiiiiiii�i �I �� i �� -..,...,.,.. — ::z:�:=,.: � �I �� ...,;,,�::;; � �., I�:l:...:...��1� � �II1:.............JI1111 (IIIIII� � I 1111111111111 �-) �i _ �i� :.... �) _I � - -- .. � I'�i�ill�l3; " �IIIIII�� `i..■.�.. — L�� -:i;l�i�;,�� Iillll� �•, �� . � , � � _ The Gregory Group INVOICE NO. 8os21 d.b.a. F.B.N O. 1062-19 LOT SURVEYS COMPANY, INC. SCALE: 1�� = 20� Established in 1962 LAND SURVEYORS • Denotes Found Iron Monument REGISTERED UNDER THE LAWS OF STATE OF MINNESOTA O Denotes Iron Monument 7601 73rd Avenue North (763)560-3093 Minneapolis,Minnesota 55428 Fax No.560-3522 �Lt�U.P�-�� C�P��t�t��i�P Property located in Section 30,Township 29,Range 24, SURVEY FOR: Hennepin County,Minnesota. Basis for • bearings is TIMBERCRAFT Property Address: 1410 Tyrol Traii,Golden Valley,MN assumed Property located in Zone"A"per FEMA map no. 27053C0354E,dated Sept.2,2004. � � n-RO� rRai� � � Catch Basin � 859.07 concrete curb 858.9/ � 1 conc apron a 859.28 1 859.4 \ -'--� N82°19'19"1/�28.00 � i � 860.85 � � � �` � { asi.s 699� ��2 . 4�. •68 � � 593�2 Z �,� u'O � �c`� � 864.5 0 --O � � � ash /5" �.y N+l �!O/z.� �,A'�� / � � • 872.5 .i � � � � I 69.2 �I � � II 6 ' � oak 30" top foundaEion I 874.4 `r�� ` 866.8 �� c \ 874.9 � � o � 668.2 2-.`'-Jtory B!'�ck . ��^'` "^ ° � es�.d� ND. �4�� 23.2 9.5 , , . 1g3� � . �r � d76.7 .:� � � � a � Ao y 868.8 N � � �, d r � , W � ,�e� . map/e 24" W �� ° 5 , � 866.0 " �y ° � o wood wall 1' � W "`� 878. ' G s\ � oak 27" ' � .P wal/tres�nto ° b�rch /2" door s�ll 872 3 p patio at No.1406 879.7 877.5 stone W 872.0 wal y� �_SL`O/' � 3 f.0 ' 0 S�eP o Y Frame � a6�.2 a � a �aeo.� N�. /4�� e6�.6 � 8.9 °i_ 1g,23 roof � gar floo� c 867.8 .- > o W 883.5 hne 6.85 � b� _ � > � � � � � c� �mi�o�s /! M � � � ,��6� � / a -- 12.3 867.4 �� o � � 3 �ellar � stone k.a/� N O � 863.6 � �/�' cQ ��e t e st � 864.3 N O ° w_w- ov+� ---- S W W_ W-w-- z cottonw od 36" �✓ teps ° - 869.! pyerhead w��es _-�- o f ro � - Powe�Pole 3 �,��' m- J e f 5 0, � _- � � `�� 862.5 � ad�;�e% P a � o rnew� wDOd steps W_ 872.2 M �,�/ �W� wood wal! I / �W w-�W� �� S0 wall south of _ S g�°45'S2 W �9 /��e r.3+-feet I 0 i oak 2/" f3%0.4 I i 887.9 _J��-� � 8%7.2 �\��«�� I � �2- StOI"Y StUCCO I No. l 52/ � � � r �.- Sf�R � �1�� _ � ...�.- _ Lot l, Block 5, 'rY�ZOL HILLS Hennepin County, Minnesota The only easements shown are from plats of record or information provided by client. I certify that this plan,specification,or report was prepared by me or under my direct sypervision and that I am a duly Licensed land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota Surve��i this 28th day of August 2Q12. Rev Drawn By ��,t Signed File Name ---- Th-1-5fb1Q6219inv80521.dwg Gre .Prasch,Minn.Reg.No.24992 �.-1�� )� �-.;..,�s � : � � : � PI ' � anning T)cp►artment 763-593-$Q95/763-593-8109(fax) Date: January 16, 2013 To: Board of Zoning Appeals From: Joe Hogeboom, City Planner Subject: Continued Hearing- Variance Requests— 1950 Douglas Drive No. (Golden Valley Congregation af Jehovah's Witnesses) Background The Golden Valley Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses, owner of the property located at 1950 Douglas Drive No., is seeking variances from City Code to allow for the construction of a new Kingdom Hall worship facility and an accessory storage shed. The existing Kingdom Hall building would be demolished. The Golden Valley Congregation appeared before the Board of Zoning Appeals in December, at which time the Board voted to table the hearing. The Board requested that the Congregation consider amending its plans to move the proposed new building further away from the residential property to the north. The Congregation did submit a revised plan that shows the building moved to a distance of 48 feet from the north property line (the previous location was 16 feet from the north property line). Because of the new lot configuration, two parking spaces would be lost. In addition, the Congregation proposes adding a fence along the north property line near the proposed building. In 2015, Hennepin County plans to reconstruct Douglas Drive. At that time, the intersection of Douglas Drive and Duluth Street would be reconstructed and a portion af the south area of the lot would be acquired and used for roadway/sidewalk expansion. Due to the City's involvement in the road recanstruction project, the City Attorney advises that the City is obligated to provide variances to the Gold�n Valley Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses to allow the use to remain on the site. Variances Requested This proposal requires the following variances from City Code: • Section 11.46, Subd. 7 Side and Rear Yard Requirements. 0 2 ft. off the required 50 ft. to a distance of 48 ft. at the building's closest point to the side yard (north) property line. 0 19 ft. off the required 50 ft. to a distance of 31 ft. at the building's closet point to the rear yard (east) property line, 0 9 ft. off the required 25 ft. to a distance of 16 ft. at the parking lot's closest point to the side yard (north) property line. • Section 11.46, Subd. 8 Front Yard Setback Requirements. 0 15 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 20 ft. at the parking lot's closest point to the front yard (west) property line. • Section 11.46, Subd. 9 (2)Accessory Structure Requirements. 0 25 ft. off the required 50 ft. to a distance of 25 ft. at the storage shed's closest point to the side yard (north) property line. • Section 11.46, Subd. 9 (B)�1) Accessory StructurQ Requirements. o The proposed storage shed will not be located completely to the rear ot the principal structure as required by City Code. • Section 11.73, Subd. 3 Minimum Number of Off-Street Parking Spaces. 0 11 spaces off the required 68 spaces for a total of 57 required parking spaces. a f / � 23�5 � Z395 ; :� ./ S�€ndbu � ��sll Fi�ls3s ' � 35�► � .E��' ` �3�° � f 31b ' � 6i1521 6412U 6X�U 595�� 5]ilo ! 8fl5 1� � 2335 ; Z3�)1 y� J. � ... ,., 23£IU � �,_ ,.. `` ,., � �_ _ _ ... .r,. ��#dE��r'�Rd _ �_. ., ..� �B13t1 , � kt"esthroek Rd _ a � «- ---'----.. " � 2?55 ' z__._ r 63Z5 - ---_.._._....._..___ � 23t151',•t �fl55 8fl25 8015 59t15 5901 a 6$25 '"�� 63t15 �- ,�,�,'�.. � ' � 223tl =" 9155�',-y Westbra�k Rd � 2��{� �� 7,�0 ��po sq�+ ��p �iiP 7�a�� w �s�ss ,�; �2?1Q 1� 101 } 2�� 602t1 6�41fl 5920 594CI f i 22&10 �.�- � _ . � 2155 � Wastmaeca 1M�y °" �° ° µ� .,-,� y .. g 2130 2145 � �15{1 027 B005 59d 59�2155 � �1fiU ('r� € A � f � � 212�J 2125 : :, '� � �'!�� x�'� a�ts � �t�s sua�souo sssn ss�o �°� � u� _.. �__ _.�ennean i�tr � �9€11 � .__ _. Y.__=�'` � uas � � zoao � st�a� � i ,.' ' i� � W � 2uao � � = 6 � � :� � st�,�� 4 3U7d31 1 3€11b 2flfl5 �' 8�0 ' � 2flDd 1> _ � 2{)00 ' 1 ;�riri/!�ifij i. �_ �� i . '�i�/�/ '��% ! s` � Subject Property � �� ;�' � !�'f�' ��'° ��' �'� % I .�. _ °" ` Duiulh St _ �_. ... "--- 1950 � �,. F� t� -�6��---� ( �3d �� 1'" � 1933�� " �� _ 1J $::: 79�7 � 5937 ' -_'--..� ��, i � � � 1 � �� 192U 192t � 192� �``•--�._ , � 2fl � � � 5851 � ��, r� �1D5 T'� a SQ�O 802U BQEifl �� 1910 »� ,� _ _ _ _ _ ____ ��. �`{ __„J .._� �' `" ,,. .� ' � �\ ,.' � --� �- fluluth La �� w� �.� 1$84 31 .��4� `` `' ... _ .,.^' '' � ' J^ `�.��150 frr18Q1 � �tr5 $tS35 015 tltl5 �N'� 3 5 � I `�C^�``�. `�17�t5�� `„� � 1�$A Z �"`�-..,,.� ?l4flBj+WC"��,?�� \"O�� f``�,.,. : - ---.._ \ �: �`""�-_. "-�l�� —�� '��` 6140 l, � IBCISO BQ2U BUOfl 595t1 980 �.-.�.,,�?`�� 5 592U 654t1 ''---T-� °---.,, � 'Y��.�.fr 4120 1..... . �1��852Q � 7'----,� �\' tte�neyw�rt!Atsr�d � 17 4 ' '� °�i�tfb�rry E.� _� -,. ,..�,� ��` ,s- _ �'r51U j� r '`7,. �� '� �`�" �� ` �8{i55 �gp25 Ufl5 9S5 � � [� Jj },,,,�� 46 �\ •��,�:f '�=.'^,n`^�,4`./"�� 1�� f "�..� �``. 3 �.� {` �'�Z�\ +..�..�� .�1��J ,�.A�'� I ' � ss3s;�---'�� ``--� �n � �, . � � � �zo�r .-- �� 168f1 �5�7 i��s pR �w -�,��,�� ' f 7+��1 �r�`�� . ��fi25 � 0 I 6t15� � 87U / ! ("�`,''-`° -*�f ,,�� :w,$� � � ,`. °� �x� 162fl -`�`-._ ��4�` � 1431 ' � g ^�r��fl U�0 594{1593t1 ' `. =1�619 "� .`�...�i3�`-. � � � � '`. �03fl 5920 a r-�- ,��- 1 5��w "'�'' � �'.. 1441 i 14a�0'4i+��,`��,� a��,.��,��m,�:uras ..�,��M=��;=��,e�:,z�:� �405%`�. „ ri'.`^.� : � � av�r �� ' �' c� r/!��C �, � ' � a� � � � ��. �.,y d _e � �� c�ty r�f 'r� �►��'e�t � ��. � � Zoning Code Variance Application 1. Streetaddress: 1950 DOUgIaS DrIVE N. 2. Applicant Information: Name: Golden Valley Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses Address: Michael Cave r �7c� �a�lit�s��c�. �-7- G�,�-�.N �A�+t_.t'iY �1 1\] `� ��-�.s�_ Email Address: CaVe.michae1109@gmail.com Phone Number: \61 2� ZZ6-2273 3. Provide a detailed description of need for a variance from the Zoning Code, including: • Description of building(s) • Description of proposed addition(s) • Description of proposed alteration(s)to property Existing Description: The existing Kingdom Hall was constructed in 1957. This multilevel building consists of 4,051 sqft on the various levels. It is a masonry structure with granite veneer both inside and out. This structure is impossible for disabled individuals to traverse the entire building, it is extremely energy inefficient and because of the multi levels and current design it is cost prohibited to renovate to meet the current ADA standards. Proposed Description: The new 5,000 sqft Kingdom Hall design is a very attractive, energy efficient design capable of ineeting all the current Congregations needs, ADA standards and building codes with only the addition of less than 1,Q00 sqft. 4. Minnesota State Statute 462.357 requires that a property exhibit"practical difficulties" in order for a variance to be considered. Practical Difficulties: • result in a use that is reasonable. • are based on a problem that is unique to the property. • are not caused by the landowner. • do not alter the essential character of the locality. To demonstrate how your request will comply with Minnesota State Statute 462.357, please respond to the following questions: Explain the need for your variance request and how it will result in a reasonable use of the property. Because of the CSAH 102 (Douglas Drive)Transportation Improvements,the existing property will be reduced by 8,761sqft, making it impossible to accommodate our current needs and still meet the ADA and parking requirements. What is unique about your property and how do you feel that it necessitates a variance? The reduction of lot size because of the CSAH 102 (Douglas Drive) Transportation Improvements project. Explain how the need for a variance is based on circumstances that are not a result of a landowner action. The reduction of lot size because of the CSAH 102 (Douglas Drive) Transportation Improvements project. Explain how, if granted,the proposed variance will not alter the essential character of your neighborhood and Golden Valley as a whole. We are not changing the use of the property. The new building will fit well in the neighborhood, it will be a functional and attractive addition to the surrounding area. With the added access to the property on North Douglas Drive, the existing traffic flow on Duluth St. should be reduced. There is already a mixture of residential and commercial business in this area. 5. The City requests that you consider all available project options that are permitted by the Zoning Code prior to requesting a variance.The Board of Zoning Appeals will discuss alternative options to seeking variance with you at the public hearing. Please describe alternate ways to do your project that do not require variances to the Zoning Code. The following alternatives have been considered, however, none are acceptable to the Congregations, they are: Renovation of the existing Kingdom Hall. The estimated costs exceed the costs of a new building. Smaller building (less capacity), this would not meet capacity the needs of the Congregations using the Kingdom Hall. Multilevel building; This option while may meet the capacity needs of the Congregations, it wrould add costs of$100,000 to$150,000 to the project costs for elevator, lift and/or ramps and possible the need for fire sprinkler system. 6. Please submit a current survey of your property.You must indicate the proposed addition, including new proposed building and structure setbacks, on the survey. A copy of Golden Valley's survey requirements is available upon request. Please note that this application is considered incomplete without the submittal of a current property survey. 7. Please submit at least one current color photograph of the area affected by the proposed variance.You may attach a printed photograph to this application, or you may email a digital image to plannir��C��oldenvallevmn.�ov. You may submit additional photographs as needed. To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct. I also understand that unless construction of the action applicable to this variance request, if granted, is not taken within one year,the variance expires. I have considered all options afforded to me through the City's Zoning Code, and feel that there is no alternate way to achieve my objective except to seek a variance to zoning rules and regulations. I give permission for Golden Valley staff,as well as members of the Board of Zoning Appeals,to enter my property prior to the public hearing to inspect the area affected by this request. 0 ��(',�—s�. Signature of Applicant If the applicant is not the owner of all property involved in this application, please name the owner of this property: C'jcr Z D'.N V A L<,�� C.c�N�i2t;Cy�TI p=y c�� N� vw��'� � �J t Z�� i �1 �9 � ��-'-� , Print Name of owner Signature of owner $150 Application Fee Attached (for Single Family Residential) $250 Application Fee Attached (for all other Zoning Districts) Please note: The City of Golden Valley will send notice of your variance request to all adjoining property owners as well as owners of properties directly across streets or alleys. Your neighbors have the right to address the Board of Zoning Appeals at your public hearing. You are advised to personally contact your neighbors and explain your project to them prior to the public hearing. � � H_6959_�£6_Z�6�I_O$99-Q[Z-Z66 'OASV18'A dI11Hd ylOS3NNlw `�l3llyA N3410� � — -- awaawa��,b,.>, �,�,��_„�.�:> 3�1�4 Shc�f104 'ON 056� m � � � �d ��dH Woa�N�� 3��en N�a�o� � ° `� � c�-�o-�o�3ira �� a3e�nN NouYrusr�3a 31111 1�3f'021d m o � N Z Yios�Ni 7 eo�yis 3ru eo Vt 3Hi a�atyn ia nH� �N i a�i n e �S 0�(�� M�N �Q� � F II � j ~ � 03SN3�11 A100 y I 1{M1LL 0�/ N 3dOS �C.7 W 193l110 a�aNn ao 3 1,B 032ryd38d S/ 180d38 m W � :i W ao Naiv�ei�as'Nrw s� iyHi�uaaa�a �+oa i ��—N y�d 31 IS 4 3S 0 d 0�d a � 2 A9 Noisin3a 31`dd ON 3'll 133H � y o g (n n � � n ' � y � �1X3--F9'86t --M3N--£9'89l M,.lZ,91.005 ~��'�� i �� ii i ' u 1 � � ° ii i q , u ', � I'� .- „ , a Y� � y I II � z J i i u <a= u � � - r ,- ,� � i u I za� I � II I N I � X 1 � I � � II I i'a N I - I 1 1 � 1 �� N O j I I � � � II I rn � i � I I I �� i _ � F I ' M � II ii � 205 SEATI G IN A�N AUDITORIU�I o i i� ii ///� x AC � � II ° � �� < �� I li I �� .-. � � �� u ° u i � u � i �� I 57qt9ED � I II � /�__—_ � � II �\�\\ I � /_ \\ I II \\ . _y� + \� � I � I I i 1� 5r'` i I � � I ii � � II � � � � i ii i ' � u � � ' �� ' ,�, .-.► � � � u � L �J �' � � ,' ��' ; � ii i �-- I�—i\.�I , �i � � � r� � II� ' �� . i � � �- II I�j e L_- �\ \ �I i �i Y/ � . � .� �� 11`' N I Ij Ij I � � � I j� I� I \ \�� il �I � � II � �I \ � � II �� II I � II �� \ �� II �JJ �� _— ' _ — , Z � II � I\\\\�'�`. � � I I �� i��. � I �� I 3 I �� i I I Z I II � I W 0 � i I� � I I o '� ° f +� i II � i I � M .n � g �� F I II .� � � � �a a �{' � I II 2 � � . � � k W o � � i II 3 I I x � � � Z I ii i 1.% w � � �� ' 1 � lT � � " ' � � � _ � � �� 'ri � „ � — ' II II I �� M � II II II II �� I �� I � � ' � �� h � � � II II � � �I II II N � .'�I ' i II il � � � � ' � �� II � � �s � �\I - l - ,0-�tZ 1 .- - ,0-.OZ �. � ii 4 �� ,�0 \\ � 0 �� \ � g '� , \ _ _ 1X3__l£.99L 3•.11�9 .00 W • • ,%' Nam-n ��`� --' . % � ------ ---b �-- ---- -- -- - -------------r---�---- — - . � � � � � � � ____ __--___------=--h13N -8l'£bl 3..lZ.St.00N =_-°____- -_ -- _--__'� \�=__ � 0 � � � ORTH OUGLAS RI E �c �- �' -______=_____________________________________=____ -___-___-_, _ ===o �,, ,, „ ,_� , �'°, � u ,�, ,� �� II �� —► �� „ „ o �� , o �� i fl i�i ii ii � ii u � u u L J H_6999_I£4_Z96 �M-0888-8LZ-Z96 �oNS�,a �� d�,�Hd yloS3NN�W `�3��dn N3a�o� - 3ni�a sd��noa �oN o�s� � �� dH Woa�N�� en N�a�o� m N �° o W z�-ea-�t�3iva aooFt a3a�rynN Nouaaisis3a m � N N Z `� 3�1u i�3road � o � 'V1oS3NN� > II �0 31tl1S 3H1 �0 SMVI 3H1 2i34�{fl 1�311H� zZ�£0£`8 z �N i a�i n e M�N �o� � �' ' > ~ 03SN3�Il Alfld y I 1tlN1 ONV NOISN2J3dfiS � � W �9 1�3211Q A a3aNn aools�A3�0321tld321d SVM 1210d321 N y�d �1 I S a 3 S 0 d 0�d � 210 N011d'JI�I�dS 'NVId SIHl 1VH1 J�i11213� A83213H 04 I 60-OZ-£ � m a � o = N 31'd4 ON , � y 3"1111 133HS o N o � (n ��1�.�U � C, J1X3--�9'86l --M3N--£9'89l M,.lZ,91.00S i ii ii i ii ;i I :� � 4 . . -� � -.� —'- - - - - - i �� ii j .r- - - - - - - — - - - - - - _ �� i . - ii i 4 � � � i ii � � � I � b � � � i � u � '�� ; u � ,,,I _ ;� � i ° � `�'3 w I ;� xZ Z a r � � I � li w '� � � II I lL v�'t �� b � I � I� �� S Q �. � r � �— � _ . � ; �� n .� _ � , ,� o_ � � �� 8% \ry � ' � !_ �i . I� � � I I � .. ( � II il u_n�ra \ � �' �I ' � y� q � � i ° u �� I � / � _ � .o-,a � ii ii \ i i I / � � � ; ii ' . . i .o-, � . -,e� - �-�--�� i ! ��``� ( � 4 ` � � �i� � �� `� � � � �� i i � � F- r � i � � I� � �� -,'�,;� � � I � wQ ;' � � I ; � ', � ` \-'f � — �,' � � i i � �? ' � i / � � '� � � �� ' � � � N I I I � Q � � � � � � � N j � j � I I . I Q c� � � y� � \ T � � � II I/i . O i-'_- O � eg � p �Ti�/ -� .o-�ZI -. S� � I II YI � � � �I I � � II il \ � rRUU-n 00 I � i ii �i ' \ N V �� II �I Q � \� \� � I � I II � I I / \� � I I I� � �� I � � � j � . �� II � ��\ O � � Z � � � �� +-� � � ry � � ---- - - � I I� I I �� r i �� r— I" � o � o � � � � n � � /� � � i u = � z � �.' � ? i i i �— i i �' ' J I rn \ � - - — — � � �� I W i II � , � M � 1�' �n � al � � I� � I � � � � I I �I i I I � °- a I I I I j ,n � 3y � I I I X Q\ 3 � � Z 3 I i II I u I, � � � r� \ � C � I I� I / I,� � � � O � i II I� I p � � � � I �� II t� 6 � � II II I W p � I Il I� S II I� � M \ I � II I� il II I � � � I i II li II I pp � \ � II I� N � p -�LI I j I� �I� I � � � ' � " �'I N I �i o ♦�� I i i '�, o � o �� A � � � �� n �� ,; � � �, i ,� `\ � � ,� - � . , ' �� -,w � � _ lX3__«.99L 3..LZ�91.00 � W� , � ,� ��-n °�, � � - __= � ___'^ _____ __ _ °__---_--- -------__ ?-_-___ - —_��_- �r— ___°° � \==___�_� M3N -8l'��t 3„�z,9�.00N � t O � ♦— NOi�TH DOUC L�5 Di�l�/E � ♦- 4 1J � = -_--------------------__------------- ----- --__- ____-_�_„ , :-___� ,_ ;, ,, „ ,, � �, ,. � �-� ,, --► °, " " —► �� ;- �� ;, �� ,, �� i� o �� ii „ --► ii u ° �i ,� i� �� - �� - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - �