07-08-13 PC Agenda AGENDA
Planning Commission
Regular Meeting
Golden Valley City Hall, 7800 Golden Valley Road
Council Chambers
Monday, July 8, 2013
7 pm
1. Approval of Minutes
June 10, 2013 Regular Planning Commission Meeting
2. Informal Public Hearing — Conditional Use Permit (CUP) — 6124 Olson
Memorial Highway —Auto Repair/Wheel Alignment in the Industrial Zoning
District— CU-134
Applicant: Jeff M. Forss DBA The Alignment Guy
Address: 6124 Olson Memorial Highway
Purpose: To allow for an Auto Repair/Wheel Alignment business in the
Industrial Zoning District.
3. Informal Public Hearing —Zoning Code Text Amendment—Adding Section
11.75 "Salar Energy Systems" —ZO00-91 (Continued Item)
Applicant: City of Golden Valley
Purpose: To consider the addition of Section 11.75 "Solar Energy Systems" to
the Zoning Chapter of the City Code
--Short Recess--
4. Reports on Meetings of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority, City
Council, Board of Zoning Appeals and other Meetings
5. Other Business
• Discuss 2012 Planning Commission Annual Report
6. Adjournment
` This d�cument is av�ilabl�in alternate form�ts upon a 72-hour request.Please call
i63-593-8DOb(TTY:763-593=3968)ta make a request. Examples ofi alternate formats
may include larga print,electronic, Braille,autliacassette,etc.
Regular Meeting of the
Golden Valley Planning Commission
June 10, 2013
A regular meeting of the Planning Commission was held at the Golden Valley City Hall,
Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota, on Monday,
June 10, 2013. Chair Kluchka called the meeting to order at 7 pm.
Those present were Planning Commissioners Boudreau-Landis, Cera, Kluchka, McCarty
and Segelbaum. Also present were Community Development Director M�rk �E���nes, City
Planner Joe Hogeboom, Planning Intern Brett Angell and Administrativ�Assist��it Lisa
Wittman. Commissioners Baker and Waldhauser were absent. ��!
ii
�,;,
1. Approval of Minutes °°
May 13, 2013 Regular Planning Commission Meeting
MOVED by Cera, seconded by McCarty and motian �r�ied unanimously to approve the
May 13, 2013 minutes as submitted.
2. Informal Public Hearing — Conditi,���,� Use Permi�;(CUPj — 8851 7t� Avenue
North — Drive-Thru Window in #���Commerc���h���i�ing District—CU-133
� ��, � x.
. ,
Applicant: Sweet Cream P.���Qrtics �bl��n Valley, LLC (Culver's)
Address: 8851 7th Avenue North
Purpose: To aIIQw for a drive-thru window in the Commercial Zoning District.
Angell stated that tl� applicaii�t,is proposing to construct a Culver's Restaurant at 8851 7tn
Avenue North. He explairt�c! tha�the applicant would like to operate a drive-thru window
which requires a,Condi#ional U�e Permit. He noted that the proposed restaurant will be
4,300 square feefi:in siz�.with an 807 square foot patio and the ability to seat 126
customers?�J��l�.,�,efer�l to�� photo of the site and said that there will be 64 parking spaces.
He add�d tf��t�f�i������tj��is zoned properly and designated properly on the General
Land Use Plan map for this use and staff is recommending approval of the requested
Canditional Use per.mit.
Segelbaum referred to the number of parking spaces and asked if staff believes that 64
spaces will be sufficient. Grimes stated that Culver's is kind of a hybrid restaurant in that
approximately half of their business will be a sit-down type of restaurant, and not strictly a
fast food type of restaurant so staff is comfortable with 64 parking spaces. Segelbaum
asked how the parking for this site would compare to a different type of restaurant.
Grimes said a typical fast food restaurant would require more parking spaces. He added
that staff's goal is to not have to pave areas any more than necessary for parking and to
keep parking at a reasonable amount.
McCarty referred to the analysis factor regarding the effect on traffic and stated that it
seems like there will be more traffic as a result of this use than the property's current use.
Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission
June 10, 2013
Page 2
Angell stated that staff feels that this proposed use is not expected to have a negative
impact on the traffic in the area. Grimes added that when staff analyzes traffic for this type
of use the main concerns are the impact on the streets, if there is adequate capacity and
if the proposed accesses function properly. He added that the City's Public Works
Department has reviewed the plans and feel the proposal will work. Kluchka suggested
the staff report state that the proposal won't impact the capacity or the operation of the
streets rather than saying the proposal won't impact traffic. Grimes added that another
thing staff considers is how the drive-thru works. In this case, the applicant feels that the
site will be more than adequate to meet their needs.
,;E��
Segelbaum asked if any thought has been given to walkability around`tf�� site and..the
ability to ride a bike to the restaurant. Angell stated that sidewalks �nd walkabilitye�� the
area have been discussed and is being studied as part of the H�ghwa ���5 �t�ne�al and
Renovation Area goals. Grimes stated that the City's Sidewal�C Comr���tee coul�J also
review this proposal. He added that staff could work with Culve,r's ar� obtai�ing an
easement for sidewalks in the future. Boudreau-Landi���sked if`there �r�other sidewalks
in the area.
Kluchka asked if adding a bike rack has been di��ussed.`A�r�gell said he wasn't aware of
discussions regarding bike racks.
Kluchka asked if landscape plans will k�� submitted.���'�m�s�stated that a landscape plan
will be reviewed as a part of the bui����a�'p�rr�it`process.
Segelbaum asked if all drive-thruywindo�i4rs require a Conditional Use Permit or just drive-
thru windows in the Commercia� zo�i�g����district. �rimes stated that every drive-thru
window requires a Condi�ional Use Permit.
Chris McGuire, McCon Building Corp., representing the applicant, stated that they are
intending to install sidewalks ar�d a bike rack and they will follow whatever the City Code
requires regarding landscap�ng. Kfuchka suggested that they have those items shown on
the plans when fih�y ga q�fore the City Council for consideration.
Cera asked a�o�t:fi����r,n��Pine for the project. McGuire said they would like to start
construc4�n i�°I�te Ju'I��'�r early August with completion in November.
Seg��baum su�ge�ted that the applicant stripe a pathway in the parking lot that shows
what route pedestrians should take. McGuire stated safe access will be created from the
patio to th�sidewalk.
Segelbaum asked the applicant if the 64 parking spaces shown on the plans will be too
many, too few or adequate. McGuire stated 64 spaces are more than they have at some
of their other locations however that will be a nice number for this site. Segelbaum said
the City would be open to reducing the number of parking spaces. McGuire said that 64
spaces will work very well.
Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission
June 10, 2013
Page 3
Kluchka said he would like to see the sidewalk plan done for this area before the Culver's
goes in.
Cera referred to photos submitted with the agenda and asked if they are representative of
what will be built on this site. McGuire stated that this restaurant will be similar to the one
shown in the photos however it will be slightly taller.
Kluchka referred to the site plan and asked the applicant to explain the drive-thru stacking
area. McGuire showed on the site plan how the drive-thru traffic would v�c�rk and noted
that there is enough room for 15 to 16 cars. a;I�°�`�'
Boudreau-Landis asked if the drive aisles and radii for emergenc��vehicfes:will b� 20 feet
in width as required. McGuire said they are both greater than 2Q feet in wid�h..
Kluchka opened the public hearing.
Julie Peterson, Applicant, said she is exited to bring Culver'�;#o Golden'Valley. She stated
that there is a bike trail near their proposed store so a bi�C� rack wQuld be a good thing to
install. She said she would bring a landscape plan to the'��uncil meeting and she also
feels that sidewalks in this area are importa��� i�5�
Hearing and seeing no one else wishing to connment, 141uchka closed the public hearing.
Kluchka asked Grimes about the timeline of t�is area's overall sidewalk plan. Grimes
explained that the Highway 55 Renewal �nd Renovation district could be on hold because
the recently approved Tiburc�n aparkment projecf is currently on hold. He noted that the
City's sidewalk plan does c�ll for sidewalk in this entire area it is just a matter of having
the funds to construct theai�l,,He added tt%at the City cannot stop development because of
sidewalks or make �#develo�����hstall sidewalks. Segelbaum stated that the applicant has
said they would be v�i����Ig�;to insta!! sidewalks and he would like to encourage them to do
so even if the �ity can't requ�r�,them to. Boudreau-Landis asked if there is a plan in place
regarding the m��nten�'���of s��ewalks. Grimes stated that the City cu�rrently maintains
public sidewalks. McCarty said he understands there are things they might like to have
but questioned if t�e Planrring Commission has the authority to require them. Kluchka
said the Planning Commission doesn't have the authority to require sidewalks be he
thinks it is gQOd to have the discussion. Cera said he feels Culver's is a destination
restaurant and is a good use of the property that will bring business to the area.
MOVED ��=�era, seconded by Segelbaum and motion carried unanimously to
recommend approval to allow for the operation of a drive-thru window in a Commercial
Zoning District for the property located at 88517th Avenue North subject the following
conditions:
1. The Site Plans submitted with the application shall become part of this approval.
2. All signage must meet the requirements of section 4.20 of City Code.
3. All future improvements to the building shall meet the City's Building Code
requirements.
Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission
June 10, 2013
Page 4
4. The applicant shall consider amending the site plans to include a landscape plan, a
sidewalk/pedestrian plan, a bicycle rack, a drive-thru stacking plan and a striped
area showing pedestrian use on the site.
5. All other applicable local, state and federal requirements shall be met at all times.
--Short Recess--
3. Reports on Meetings of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority, City
Council, Board of Zoning Appeals and other Meetings : ;,
,:,
Grimes gave a status report on various proposals and projects tha#will be coming before
the Planning Commission including, the proposed performance ��n'ing distr:ict, th�.solar
energy ordinance, and the formation of a Bottineau Transitwayr�tation �rea��lani�ing
steering committee. � , `
���� ���
4. Other Business r
���; `"'
;r
No other business was discussed. � `' ��� `�` �'1
� , t
5. Adjournment
The meeting adjourned at 7;57 pm.
,.
Chuck Segelbaum, ��cretary-: ���
�1?i.� '�ifi�
F�.
>� ,
���� ��
Planning Deparfiment
763-593-8095/763-593-8109(fax)
Date: July 8, 2013
To: Golden Valley Planning Commission
From: Brett Angell, Planning Intern
Subject: Informal Public Hearing on Conditional Use Permit (CUP-134) to Allow for the
Operation of an Auto Repair/Wheel Alignment Shop at 6124 Olson Memorial
Highway—Jeff M. Forss (The Alignment Guy) Applicant
Background and Proposed Use
Applicant Jeff Forss is proposing to construct a new automotive repair shop at 6124 Olson Memorial
Highway. Mr. Forss is requesting a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to allow for the operation of the
automotive repair shop. The location of the proposed automotive repair shop is zoned industrial.
Auto repair shops are consistent with that designation as a conditional use.
The proposed automotive repair shop will be located within the West Building of Expressway
International Park and will be a total of 1,800 square feet. The auto repair shop will fill an existing
structure, so no additional buildings will be built. The auto repair shop will consist of two lifts and
one alignment rack.
The Alignment Guy specializes in wheel alignments, suspension part replacement, wheel bearings,
drive axle, tire and wheel, brake, and related chassis repair work. The business was established in
2002 and does not have any additional employees. The applicant would like to relocate to Golden
Valley from Bloomington due to his current building having a new owner, who will not be renewing
his license.
Analysis af Ten Factors
The Planning Commission must make findings on ten factors when reviewing a CUP application.
They are as fallows with staff comment:
1. Demonstrated Need of the Use: The City requires that an applicant identify a market for the
proposed good or service necessitating a CUP. In this case, the applicant believes this is an ideal
location for an auto repair shop.
2. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan: The General Land Use Plan Map guides this site for
Industrial uses. Auto repair and storage is considered a conditional use in the Industrial zoning
district. Many auto repair businesses operate in Industrial areas throughout the city.
3. Effect on Property Values in the Area:The auto repair business should not have a negative
impact on property values in the area. The proposed use is isolated from residential areas and is
adjacent to the railroad tracks and other Industrial uses. Auto oriented businesses are best
suited for these types of areas.
4. Effect on Traffic in the Area:The additional traffic generated from this type of use is minimal.
There is excess street capacity on both Olson Memorial Highway and Douglas Drive.
5, Effect of Increases in Density or Population on the Area:The proposed use will have no effect
on population.
6. Increase in Noise Created by Use:There may be some noise level increases from the auto repair
business although staff believes it will be minimal.
7. Any Dust, Odor or Vibration caused by Use: Due to the location near Olson Memorial Highway
and the railroad tracks, these issues will not be a problem at this location.
8. Any Increase in Animal Pests Caused by the Use:The proposed use will not attract animal pests
of any kind.
9. Visual Appearance of the Use:The proposed auto repair shop will not be changing any of the
exterior factors of the building, so it should have no impact of the visual appearance on the site.
10. Other Effects of the Use: Staff does not anticipate any negative effects of the proposed use.
Recommended Action
Staff recommends approval of Conditional Use Permit 134 allowing Jeff Forss (The Alignment Guy)
to operate an auto repair facility at 6124 Olson Memorial Highway. The approval of a Conditional
Use Permit is subject to the following conditions:
1. The site plan shall become a part of this approval.
2. All signage shall meet the requirements of Section 4.20 of City Code.
3. All future improvements to the building shall meet the City's Building Code requirements.
4. All other applicable local, state and federal requirements shall be met at all times.
5. Failure to comply with any of the terms of this permit shall be grounds for revocation.
Attachments
• Location Map (1 page)
• Memo from Deputy Fire John Crelly dated June 17, 2013 (1 pagej
• Applicant's Narrative (1 page)
• Site Plans (3 Pages)
� I II � IIIIIIII � �I � � �..� � �� � � "�• � �L
1_LJ��.L._L1�.�1. LLl..._.L.J s��m; `�i 3 {.� �� � , ✓',�''�- Ws ! t� ; � e
. PIy7a%6ltth AYS 1`i' ��� ; � � 1 c�( j� � ' °�
i �" �i I
�! � B � � -� �+ �t � Or
� € r �� � j � �,
� i r".-
.a ' a f �YI ����; � � � � ��.
�. � „_ �}t�Il'tX94-,r�—..:� � � ,�, � � �r �f ,{ .,. «.� �" � € �
�.a"-:".'r"`�� ^�y. I I [ � ^''"'.�� { 1°a � '` r���y �°�� gi � .�wg
� t .. - �� �,Y-� ,��,�-'`! � kk � � g�
`y"'' � '' ii: � 4 - ��,�"' 1 � E
��, z - w�� r �,"� � ��� � /�� -�.��- � 8 S b 1
�,,r
�i � ���`v�'` � � g .w,�.»,�"� �try / /`y:_rTt_tPhc�rreuc St � � �
r�-
� �' b �.r,- � �� �:
�'� �.- w� ,�
< , �---�'� ,� ����� Subject Property: � � �
� � �,;:.-� ,
����t�� �
�'� 6124 Olson Memorial Hwy � � ��
_ �;��t�, . ' $ ' �� � �.�
-''°-" * . , � � '� � � t � .. *. � � � �
� � � � � --�-�-�� !�
�._; � � � � F� � � �
^'`� � ~-. � � ., . � ---_. °�� cs� ;�,�
'� i ; . -�_____ � �¢ �
�'t '?.. � '� �.tj:�;, � �_.�_—�-�_ w ��£ �4
�i�o'�� � ��
I � ;!/l�'' r %?; � �� !
I � f� ,� �
�" �l ��� �!%� i
/ � �
(A3 � � l�/ � � �
�`,„,,. . � ��/l! �/ �� ;� �
r � � ,;,,,� � �� �
� �'�___._`~,,��/�r.,.;; � � b ° $
� �� s ,.;,
���
, �;� �� „�� �
ti ; � � n� � � � a� ;
1 � • ' � � � + �
F l � 3 �'`" 3
t { � 3 �' � t i
` °-�. re �i ,,�
�_.��_. � � � � 3 �' ,, � � �
m���atry Gt�sb qr� .y �� ,„ � ��♦ � �
c„ `----'f---=�,:� �~-�----.._ � ,_.� ��,�°.�'�--___'- a �„ � t i
�, °_, w, �,--�.,. � � , .t3tsc�n Miamiui�t Flwy�,�. .�,t __ .� �. .w �, S t €
�`M
_L_+� ����. �, �.,�.,« :.� -.-.�.. ... ,.. .. � � �k��'Fiyety!'d8.�"a5"��,�5�E�LO FitiYy.1QC1 NE3�
D �� . �» �° „m � -_ °"" �""� bisnr��?iemc�eC�9 Fl 1 _ ,p, .� ,� .. �
� *� �r � , _ � µ �, y�, �'�- �.��, �` � , h ,? � ;
•t�� _r""_ � .,,�vr��° �� �� � ��� �� ��,e � �'� �� � �
� � �'3i�cte ° � _,_,., t � �"3 `�
.-° � - ��� — . � P+�rpi+�Gent+�r�or Arts E+d Sc��r Fi+�l�!"� p`ti j�, � �
i
� ��yr��� .>�' �.` � e �—� ��`� e� t w� _. `ti`� `.: �E
�-._ _m — �; �
�-�t�"�-�ar��+gr _. ��, .�..�� ,.��\' �i'",,5"�� • � t � � °t �.
�_iCikxg�C y,� 'V „Ca � � � ��_� o
t
.� .1 5y�...,��� ��� 4� �} �+� �`'l ir # * y� � 8
�„71 � � �..�;'�'`� Perplcft Centei^5oet�r F'J��Ptrt�d�- ._ . .V- rc_. ..� a
-._lya��,t � �; �"`�---�iv-:� ��'�`�, Z�t I (";`..,,,, ��, �; � Wae�fsteack Av�:� ._ � � '
� � ��q y��Y y___�' .� ,� ..::«�.,y�Y�'iCh�etl�t�:+�i��Jd ��5�C1't����1f"�C .� ..
f
I ���`._�" � � � �
__ .
,�..�. �F �
�. � � � _.�
,N .� � `� ��' .�-''�i�f +�er t t������a� ��� °
�, ,' ��, d' �° . �r �-� � � �
°�`� � _ ��i. :���� �`���!`-. ���� s �, � �
� r � ,�, � � �--.��- ,� ._„„ �� -cs.
�#� � r � �' r �\ -,';:, �m �,�-°f
�°� �' •�e �' �' � � E
f s e� '� ,°`�s`� � • ` ,,,, �i,/:�
� �'��` _ ' � .-
, I r� I= �e � ��` � � ' r��;� , ,'---�a°- - �'"'
�,zu��,�����,� f �' far i�r[!_.___���"""`� 1�---�� � �ra s Turi�e�s P�ivrA�
w,��a a:t_�asa�a��ru ,�
�x�
� �� a e Fire Department
F i r e D e p a r t m e n t 763-593-8065/763-593-8098 Ifaxl
To: Mark Grimes, Director of Planning and Zoning
From: John Crelly, Deputy Fire Chief
Subject: Conditional Use Permit—The Alignment Guy
Date: June 17, 2013
I have reviewed the conditional use permit information packet for The Alignment Guy, located
at 6124 Olson Memorial Highway. Listed below are my plan review comments.
1. Parking / staging of vehicles shall be in approved locations. Fire department access
road around the building shall be maintained at 20 feet wide and the turning radius
shall be maintained 20 feet inside radius and 40 feet outside radius for the fire
apparatus. Minnesota State Fire Code (MSFC) section 503
2. The description of intended use of the site shall meet the requirements set forth in the
Minnesota State Fire Code (MSFC). A partial list of common code items includes:
a. Provide tenant space addressing, front and rear doors. MSFC section 505.1
b. Provide fire extinguishers. MSFC section 906.1
c. Provide a code compliant fire sprinkler system. MSFC section 901.4
d. Provide for proper disposal of combustible and flammable waste materials.
MSFC section 304.1
e. Maintain occupancy separations between tenant spaces as required by the
Minnesota State Building Code. MSFC 705 (if applicable)
f. Provide and maintain flammable waste traps as required by the Minnesota
State Building Code. (if applicable)
g. Provide access key for the tenant space. Key will be placed in the fire
department keybox. MSFC section 506
h. Abate all electrical hazards. MSFC 605.1
i. Maintain exit signs and emergency lighting. MSFC 1028.4
j. .......
!f you have any questions, please contact me at 763-593-8065, or my e-mail address,
jcrellY(c�cLoldenvalleymn.gov
The Alignment Guy Description of business:
The Alignment Guy is an "Under-car" shop specializing in wheel alignment, suspension part
replacement, wheel bearing , drive axle,tire and wheel, brake, and related chassis repair work. I
do not offer engine or fluid services.
Vehicles serviced are primarily modern and classic sporty cars. Work volume is 1-4 cars per day.
The business was established in 2002. I left my day job to do this full time in 2007. I have been
in my current space since September 1 st., 2007.
Reason for moving: The building has been sold and the buyer is not renewing my lease.
My reputation for honesty and good work is well known. I have an A+rating on Angie's list.
References available.
Insurance is through Auto Owners,purchased through the Hatzung agency in St. Luis Park MN.
I have no employees at this time.
Jeff Forss
"The Alignment Guy"
The Alignment Guy
www.TheAli gnmentGuy.com
http://www.flickr.com/photos/thealiqnmentquv/sets/72157603608874815/with/6904697198/
�..'^'_,.�,-+.�.., �� ��
--�-�. ..,.""�--�-•..�..
...-.
.
�
fVORTH
BUILDING ---•- - -.___ _ �
1fi,300 SQ. FT. �
.._._._._,.- - ____
�
�
�
,
,
�
, .
� ' -..--___
.. � , -
,�_�.. _ ,.� _ __ �
in�� -- --- _--__ _ -- ----- - -
� C � ----- --- _--_
WEST - --- - -_
BUILDING - -- - - - -- --
10,800 SQ. ��z`� -- --- --
, -- _ _--_ ---- ---
, _ ___ ___
~ w CENTRAL �
BUILDING '
EAST
22,200 SQ. FT. B�ILDlNG
���NTq; h �tJUTH 26,90� SQ. FT..-
,` �'�,9� �� BIJILDING ' � `
�� 13,800 SQ. FT: r ; � �
� �� i � '
1 � � t 1 �
, � � i � i
` ' �
1
1
1
, � w � +�.+.-.-..0
� � N
1
� W ; J �
� SIT� R�.A�! �•.J.�
i ' � �
r� OFFICE/SE�tViGE CENTER
Building Size 9a,000 Sq. Ft.
Lot Size 333,06$ Sq. Ft.
Parking Stalls 331
, I
i �
�
': I
, {
�
,
; �
' - - - - - - , �
� �
— — —— — — —— i i i ,�
I
Floor Plan
Scale: 1/8"=1'-0"
1,80o Tota1 Sq.Ft. Building Key:
International Square �
�os�.�Su��� 6124 Olson Memorial Hwy. ,�;,,g�„�,
Minnelonka,MN 55343 Golden V alley,NIN 55422 Rnb Brass: (952)897-7757
952.897.7874 Faz:952.897.7740 Andmo Odney: (952)897-7709
� ,v'� � ( .
� �� � �C�` �
OQ° ,�k''°f �
�
� �`�'� �'�.�`' G 1M �
: �
�
�
-� �- �e�
� � � a
_ � � �.
� �
�
�s
�� ���� i�
.. �, . .. � /�Y(�fH N'�� N
�.' J J
��_
_j_, _� ' ��!�'l�+ �tad�' CO Kl�-j�
-JIN-
�ab� �..c.srt "-f� ,i
� G
6�
�
� �
b .
3
�.
. . �
� _ �
�
�
-�,�,,o P9S�
�
(� �
, �!1'� �'�-a:rf
�5° � � �
� �s�
� ,
� � �' � �r -��'"
�? � v�� \� S ���
v
`�� 3� (� -1
. � I _ . __.. i ' � v � .
�t'�� V'� �`':i
ii(I':I�',
� '�M��r"�� . . . . . .
��. ��� Planning Departrnent
763-593-8095 I 763-593-8109(fax)
Date: July 8, 2013
To: Golden Valley Planning Commission
From: Brett Angell, Planning Intern
Subject: Recommended Addition to the City Code; Section 11.75 "Solar Energy Systems"
Background
Staff has been directed to develop an ordinance for the installation and regulation of Solar Energy
Systems. Staff worked in accordance with Minnesota Solar Challenge in order to understand how
other Twin Cities metro regions have adopted solar energy into their City Code. The concern was
that Golden Valley currently does not regulate Solar Energy Systems in the City Code besides Pole
Mounted Photovoltaic Systems.
In order to update Golden Valley's code to best suit the community and remain on-par with the
surrounding areas, research and comparisons have been performed. Based upon these
comparisons, planning staff has developed an ordinance for Solar Energy.
The Planning Commission tabled this item at the May 13, 2013 meeting to allow staff to make
some of the recommended changes to the ordinance. Staff has altered the ordinance in
accordance with the recommendations from the Planning Commission, as well as the
recommendations from Minnesota Solar Challenge.
Process
Staff focused on how Solar Energy Systems are regulated by Minneapolis and St. Paul. They were
chosen due to the fact that they have the most detailed and most recent solar energy ordinances
that have been passed and integrated into their respective City Codes. After analyzing these
cities, staff created an ordinance to fit Golden Valley.
Recommendations
Staff recommends that Solar Energy Systems be allowed within all zoning districts, subject to
administrative review and approval by the Community Development Director. This addition is
incorporated in the attached copy of proposed Section 11.75: "Solar Energy Systems" of the
Golden Valley City Code.
Attachments
• May 13, 2013 Planning Commission minutes (3 pages)
• Golden Valley City Code, Section 11.75, Solar Energy Systems Underlined/Overstruck Version
(3 pages)
Regular Meeting of the
Golden Valley Planning Commission
May 13, 2013
A regular meeting of the Planning ommission was held at the Golden Valley City Hall,
cil Chambers, 7800 Golden alley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota, on Monday,
May , 013. Chair Waldhauser alled the meeting to order at 7 pm. ....--
Those present e Planning Co missioners Baker , Kluchka, McCarty,
Segelbaum and Wa ser. Also resent w ommunity Development Director Mark
Grimes, City Planner Joe ning Intern Brett Angell and Administrative
Assistant Lisa Wittman. Comm' oudreau-Landis was absent.
1. Approval of ' utes
Mar 1, 2013 Regular PI ning Commission Meeti
MO D by McCarty, secanded by era and motion carried unanimously o approve the
rch 11, 2013 minutes as submit d.
2. Informal Public Hearing —Zoning Code Text Amendment— Adding Section
11.75 "Solar Energy Systems" —ZO00-91
Applicant: City af Golden Valley
Purpose: To consider the addition of Section 11.75 "Solar Energy Systems" to
the Zoning Chapter of the City Code
Angell gave a presentation to the Commission regarding the addition of solar energy
systems requirements to the zoning chapter of the City Code. He discussed types of solar
energy systems including building integrated systems, ground mounted systems and roof
mounted systems. He also discussed Minnesota's solar potential and noted that the City's
goal is to encourage the use of solar energy in order to reach Minnesota's goal of using
25% renewable energy by the year of 2025.
Angell referred to the proposed ordinance and discussed some of the requirements for
roof mounted systems including height restrictions, reducing visual impact by means of
location, and screening or integrating in with the roof's design. He added that ground
mounted systems would be treated as an accessory structure in regard to height, lot area
coverage and permitted locations and that building integrated systems would be treated
as part of a building.
Baker asked about the number of solar energy systems currently located in Golden
Valley. Angell said he knows of a few businesses and residential properties that have
systems. He added that staff did hear some concerns from residents and that he will
review them with the consultant from the "Minnesota Solar Challenge."
McCarty asked about the technology to store wind and solar energy. Angell said his
understanding is that energy collected can be stored or sold back to energy companies.
Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission
May 13, 2013
Page 2
Cera added that work is being done to use stored energy for electric vehicles.
Waldhauser suggested having discussions with other communities regarding communal
energy generation that homeowners could buy into.
Kluchka questioned if there should be language added to the proposed ordinance to
ensure that it protects trees on neighboring properties from being cut down in order to
gain more solar access. Angell explained that in the ordinances he researched language
about trees was added when cities wanted to allow trees to be cut down in order to allow
for solar access. Grimes noted that trees also have value in keeping energy costs down.
Waldhauser asked about the effect of new plantings. Hogeboom stated that solar access
easements could be put in place between property owners however the City does not get
involved in enforcing private easement agreements. Cera suggested adding language
regarding the preservation of existing trees. Segelbaum asked if other cities have
provisions regarding the preservation of trees. Angell stated that St. Paul has a model
ordinance and it does not mention trees. Waldhauser stated that she thinks there could
be education done about existing trees and that the ordinance doesn't necessarily need
to address it.
Waldhauser asked if there will be a permitting process. Grimes stated that building and
electrical permits will be required.
Cera asked if the City has considered offering subsidies to homeowners who install solar
energy systems. Grimes stated that there are tax credits available and that solar panels
are becoming more affordable. Baker added that energy companies also give credits.
Segelbaum referred to the definition of Building Integrated Solar System and stated that
the words "solar energy system" shauld capitalized. He also noted that Subdivision
3(A)(1) should be changed from "Building Mounted Solar Energy Systems to "Flush
Mounted Solar Systems."
Segelbaum referred to Subdivision 3(A)(2) and asked what the "exterior perimeter" of the
roof ineans. Angell exptained that the language was modeled after St. Paul's ordinance
and that he would talk to the consultant he's been working with to better define that
paragraph.
McCarty suggested that "Ground Mounted Solar System" be added to the list of
definitions. He referred to the definition of Solar Energy System and suggested the word
"significantly" be removed.
Baker referred to Subdivision 3(A)(3) regarding the visual impact of rooftop equipment
and questioned the use of the word "shall" in the first sentence. The Commission
consensus was to keep the word "shall" in that sentence however they agreed that the
word "reduced" should be changed to "minimized."
Kluchka suggested that Subdivision 4(A) regarding compatibility be removed because
following all of the requirements of the accessory structures language is too restrictive.
Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission
May 13, 2013
Page 3
The Commission agreed and suggested language regarding height and setbacks would
be clearer.
Segelbaum referred to the second sentence in Subdivision 3(C) and said the words
"building integrated systems" should be changed to "Building Integrated Solar Systems."
Waldhauser referred to the language regarding interference and asked if solar energy
systems really cause interference. Cera stated that these systems won't generate
interference.
Baker referred to Subdivision 4(E) regarding maximum capacity and asked how 100
kilowatts was decided. Angell stated that he would have further discussion with the
consultant he's been working with about that language.
Waldhauser opened the public hearing.
Andy Snope, 1320 Unity, said he's worked in the electrical industry for 20 years. He
handed out some suggested changes to the language in the ordinance which included
requiring that an electrical permit be obtained, requiring a licensed contractor to install
solar systems and not limiting the output on commercial properties to 100 Kilowatts. He
also handed out several articles regarding solar energy for the Planning Commission to
review. Hogeboom stated that Mr. Snope's comments have been forwarded to the
consultant for the Minnesota Solar Challenge.
Seeing and hearing no one else wishing to comment, Waldhauser closed the public
hearing.
MOVED by Cera, seconded by McCarty and motion carried unanimously to table this item
in order to give staff time to revise the proposed ordinance.
--Short Recess--
3. Reports on Meetings of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority, City
uncil, Board of Zoning peals and other Meetings
The Commiss discussed the rec nt Metropolitan Council resolution supporting the
Bottineau Transi . Hogeboom s ted that staff is going to su est to the City Council
that a steering commi e be forme to work on station p anning beginning this
summer.
4. Other Business
• Discussion - oposed ew "Pe ance Zoning District"
Angell gave esentation to the ommission rega � g performance zoning. He
explai at the purpose for ha ing a Performance zoning district is to allow
de lopment flexibility, regulate d sign, rather than land use type and to attract a diversity
Section 11.75: Solar Energy Systems
Subdivision 1. Purpose
The purpose of this section is to allow for and regulate the location, placement,
design, and maintenance of active and passive Solar Energy Systems to ensure
such equipment are appropriately located and are used in a safe and efFective
manner.
Subdivision 2. Definitions
A. Building Integrated Solar System: A Solar Energy System that is directly
integrated into the building by replacing typical building materials.
B. Flush Mounted Solar System: A Solar Energy System that is installed on
the roof of a building
�e�i-a-I� in which the solar panels are parallel with the finished roof
materials.
C. Ground Mounted Solar Svstem: A Solar Energy System that is installed
directly onto the ground by means of brackets or poles.
D. Non-Flush Mounted Solar System: A Solar Energy System that is installed
on the roof of a building at a
different pitch than the finished roof surface.
E. Solar Energy System: A device, structure, or part thereof that transfers
direct solar energy into thermal, chemical, or electrical energy �
,
F. Solar Garden: A communitkshared solar array with grid connected
subscribers.
Subdivision 3. Permitted Use Where Allowed
A. Building Mounted Solar Energy Systems shall be allowed in all zoning districts,
subject to administrative review and approval by the Community Development
Director, so long as they meet the following requirements:
1. Flush �g Mounted Solar Systems shall not exceed the designated height
requirement of the principal structure in all zoning districts.
2. Non-Flush Mounted Solar Systems shall extend no more than three (3) feet
above the surface of a roof at any point ' .
1
3. The visual impact of rooftop equipment on nearby properties shall be
minimized ���Q through such means as location on the roof, flush-
mounting to the roof4 screening, or other integration into the roof design.
Screening shall be of durable, permanent materials that are compatible with
the primary building materials.
4. The structure upon which the Salar Energy System is mounted shall have the
structural integrity to carry the weight of the Solar Energy System.
5. A building permit must be obtained before a mounted Solar Energy System
shall be placed on a structure.
8:—
, ,
,
���
C. Building Integrated Solar Energy System shall be considered a part of the
structure rather than a separate entity. Building Integrated Solar Systems need
to follow the regulations set by the building code.
D. All Ground Mounted Solar Svstems shall have a maximum height of ten (10)
feet.
E. Ground Mounted Solar Systems must be set back a minimum of five (5) feet
from all property lines.
F. Solar Gardens shall be permitted with a Conditional Use Permit.
Subdivision 4. Design and Performance Standards
Design and performance standards for Solar Energy Systems are hereby
established to meet the objectives of the City outlined in the Comprehensive Plan
and the purpose and other provisions of this section.
A. Compatibility with nearby properties: Solar Enerqy Systems shall be
screened from view to the extent possible without reducing their efficiency.
Screening shall utilize building materials, colors, and textures that are similar
and compatible with the existing principal structure.
B. Compliance. All Solar Enerav Systems shall be designed, constructed, and
operated in compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws,
codes, standards, and ordinances, as well as adhere to the requirements of
local utilities if connected to utility lines.
C. Encroachments and setbacks:
2
1. Solar Energy Systems shall comply with the minimum yard requirements
of the zoning district in which they are located.
2. Solar Energy Systems shall comply with applicable regulations as
established by chapter 1325 of the Minnesota State Building Code and the
National Electrical Code (NFPA 70�.
D. Interference. The Solar Energy System shall be designed to not cause
electrical, radio frequency, television, and other communication signal
interference.
E:—
F. Installation. Only licensed contractors shall be allowed to install Solar Enerav
�stems.
G. Maintenance required. All Solar Energy Systems shall be kept in good repair
and free from damaged supports, mounts, framework, or other components.
3
���� �� r
Planning Depa.rtment
763-593-8095!763-593-8749(fax)
Date: July 3, 2013
To: Planning Commission
From: Joe Hogeboom, City Planner
Subject: Planning Commission Annual Report
The City Council has requested that Chair Kluchka present an update to them about Planning
Commission activities during the past year. The Planning Department has compiled a report of
action items that were presented to the Planning Commission in 2012. In additian to this, Chair
Kluchka and staff would like to discuss trends in planning and development, as well as possible
special topics for the Planning Commission to study in the next year.
Staff would like to discuss planning-related topics that are of interest to the Planning Commission
at the July 8 Planning Commission meeting so that we may formulate a report for the City Council
in August. Staff has identified the following topics for discussion:
• Increasing senior housing opportunities in Golden Valley
• Participation in the Bottineau Transitway Station Area Planning process
• Redevelopment opportunities along Douglas Drive
• Revision to mixed-use zoning requirements to expand usage to other areas of the City
• Review of current minimum lot dimensional and setback requirements
• Identify large current and potential future commercial vacancies in the community and seek
ways to foster business growth
• Identify trends in variances requested in the past year and determine if amendments to the
Zoning Code should be considered
• 2018 Comprehensive Plan revision plan
Staff would like to work with the Commission to identify items of interest for future study. Staff will
gather information from the luly 8 Planning Commission meeting and work with Chair Kluchka to
generate a report to the City Council.
Attachments
2012 Planning Commission Summary (4 pages)
2012 Planning Commission Summary
January 9, 2012 PG Meeting Cancelled
January 23, 2012 Informal Public Hearing — Planned Unit Development
Amendment— Final Plan — 7200 Wayzata Blvd, Lupient
Infiniti — PU-66 Amendment #4 - Recommended
Approval
Informal Public Hearing — Planned Unit Development
Amendment— Preliminary Plan — 123 Ottowa Ave. N.,
Breck School — PU-88 Amendment #1 — Recommended
Approval
Informal Public Hearing —Zoning Code Text
Amendment —Amending Section 11.70 "Off-Street
Parking and Loading Regulations" — ZO00-89 - Tabled
January 30, 2012 Joint Meeting of the City Council, Planning
Commission, Environmental Commission and Open
Space and Recreation Commission - Bottineau
Transitway Draft Environmental Impact Statement
(DEIS) Comment Formulation Exercise
February 13, 2012 Informal Public Hearing — Planned Unit Development
Amendment — Preliminary Plan —4900 Triton Drive
(Eldridge 3rd Addition) — PU-109 - Recommended
Approval
February 27, 2012 PC Meeting Cancelled
March 15, 2012 Informal Public Hearing — Subdivision — 15 Meadow Lane
North — SU08-10 — Recommended Approval
March 26, 2012 Consideration of Resolution No. 12-01 Finding that the
Redevelopment Plan for the I-394 Corridor
Redevelopment Project Area (formerly known as the
Golden Hills Redevelopment Project) Conforms to the
City's Comprehensive Plan - Recommended Approval
Continued Informal Public Hearing —Zoning Code Text
Amendment—Amending Section 11.70 "Off-Street
Parking and Loading Regulations" —ZO00-89 -
Recommended Approval
April 9, 2012 Informal Public Hearing — Planned Unit Development
Amendment— Final Plan — 123 Ottawa Ave. N. - Breck
School — PU-88 Amendment#1 - Recommended
Approval
April 23, 2012 PC Meeting Cancelled
May 14, 2012 PC Meeting Cancelled
May 21, 2012 PC Meeting Cancelled
June 11, 2012 PC Meeting Cancelled
June 25, 2012 Informal Public Hearing — Conditional Use Permit-
8806-880$ 7th Ave N — Disturbia in Suburbia (Justin
Smith) — Recreational Use in the Light Industrial Zoning
District— CU-131 — Recommended Approval
Informal Public Hearing — General Land Use Plan Map
Amendment—740 Douglas Drive North and 6100 &
6110 Olson Memorial Highway — CPAM-50 - To change
the designation on the General Land Use Plan Map
from Industrial to Commercial-Office—Tabled
Informal Public Hearing — Property Rezonings — 740
Douglas Drive North and 6100 & 6110 Olson Memorial
Highway — Z012-18 - To rezone the properties from
Industrial to Business and Professional Offices - Tabled
Discussion Item - Proposed New Zoning District— Light
Commercial - Tabled
July 9, 2012 Informal Public Hearing — Minor Subdivision — 66Q1 and
6621 Medicine Lake Road — Savanah Estates — SU14-
14 — Recommended Approval
Informal Public Hearing — General Land Use Plan Map
Amendment—7345 Country Club Drive — CPAM-51 -
(Schuller's) -To change the designation on the General Land
Use Plan Map from Low Density Residential to Commercial-
Retail - Recommended Denial
July 23, 2012 PC Meeting Cancelled
August 13, 2012 Informal Public Hearing — Conditional Use Permit —
8806 7th Ave N — Minnesota School of Basketball —
Recreational Use in the Light Industrial Zoning District—
CU-132 — Recommended Approval
Informal Public Hearing — General Land Use Plan Map
Amendment— 9130 & 9220 Olson Memorial Highway—
CPAM-52 - To change the designation on the General Land
Use Plan Map from Commercial-Retail to Residential-High
Density— Recommended Approval
Informal Public Hearing — Property Rezoning — 9130 &
9220 Olson Memorial Highway—Z022-01 - Tiburon 55,
LLC - To rezone the properties from Commercial to
High Density Residential (R-4) - Recommended
Approval
August 27, 2012 Informal Public Hearing — Planned Unit Development
(PUD) — 600 Boone Avenue North — Boone Avenue
Convenience Center— PU-110 — Recommended
Approval
Informal Public Hearing — Minor Subdivision — 1540 and
1550 St. Croix Circle — Golden View Addition — SU06-
04 — Recommended Approval
Informal Public Hearing — Planned Unit Development—
Final Plan — 4900 Triton Drive (Eldridge 3rd Addition) —
PU-109 - Recommended Approval
September 10, 2012 Informal Public Hearing — Preliminary Plan Review—
Planned Unit Development (PUD) — 9130 & 9220 Olson
Memorial Highway- The Tiburon — PU-111 —
Recommended Approval
September 24, 2012 PC Meeting Cancelled
October 8, 2012 Brainstorming - 2013 Planning Commission Meeting
Schedule, PUD Process, Solar Access Ordinance, Tree
House/Play Structure Regulations
October 22, 2012 Presentation of 2013-2017 Capital Improvement
Program—Sue Virnig, City Finance Director—
Recommended Approval
Informal Public Hearing — Planned Unit
Development (PUD) — 600 Boone Avenue North —
Boone Avenue Convenience Center— PU-110 —
Final Plan - Recommended Approval
November 5, 2012 Informal Public Hearing — Planned Unit Development
(PUD) — Northwest Corner I-394 and Highway 100 —
The 3.9.4 Apartments — PU-112 — Preliminary Plan —
Recommended Approval
Informal Public Hearing — Minor Subdivision —
Glenwood Avenue and Harold Avenue — Olin Woods —
SU17-10 - Recommended Approval
Navember 26, 2012 Consideration of Resolution No. 12-01 Finding that the
Redevelopment Plan for the Highway 55 West
Redevelopment Project Area and the Tax Increment
Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing (Renewal
and Renovation) District No. 1 Conform to the General
Plan for the Development and Redevelopment of the
City, as Amended (Amended 2008 Comprehensive
Plan Update) - Recommended Approval
December 10, 2012 PC Meeting Cancelled
December 27, 2012 PC Meeting Cancelled