The URL can be used to link to this page

08-13-13 CM Agenda Packet AGENDA Council/Manager Meeting Golden Vailey City Hall 7800 Golden Valley Road Council Conference Room August 13, 2013 6:30 pm Pages 1. Human Rights Commission Update and 2013 Work Plan 2-4 2. City af Robbinsdale and Three Rivers Park Qistrict Nature Area Proposal 5 3. Planning Commission Annual Report 6-11 4. Proposed City Code Amendment - Section 10.40 - Location of Containers - 12-13 Residential Zoning Districts 5. Organized Solid Waste Process 14-30 6. Installation of Bike Racks at City Parks 31-34 7. Biennial 2014-2015 Proposed General Fund Budget 35 8. Bottineau Light Rail Transit Planning Advisory Committee Appointments 36 Council/Manager meetings have an informal, discussion-style format and are designed for the Council to obtain background information, consider policy alternatives, and provide general directions to staff. No formal actions are taken at these meetings. The public is invited to attend Council/Manager meetings and listen to the discussion; public participation is allowed by invitation of the City Council. 7his document is available in-afterr�ate formats up€�n a 72=haur req�est, Please call 763-593-80Qb (TTV: 763-593-3�368)t� make a rec�uest. Examples of alternate formats may ir�cf�r�e large print,electr�r�ic,Braille,audiocassette, etc. +�� Q� City Administration/Council 763-593-3989!763-593-8109(fax} Executive Summary Galden Valley Council/Manager Meeting August 13, 2013 Agenda Item 1. Human Rights Commission Update and 2013 Work Plan Prepared By Chantell Knauss, Assistant City Manager Summary The Human Rights Commission (HRC) has held two meetings to date and wanted to provide an update to the Council on their activities/discussions and seek direction from Council to move forward with their 2013 Work Plan. At the July 30 meeting, the HRC also adopted Resolution 13-01, recommending that the City Council proclaim Golden Valley to be a welcoming community to all and acknowledging the Minnesota Marriage Equality Act of 2013 that allows same-sex couples to marry. The HRC has been involved in assisting Global Golden Valley (GGV) in preparation and implementation of these events: July 4- Naturalization Ceremony and Celebration August 11 - International Day at Market in the Valley. This event will be postponed due to scheduling conflicts. The 2013 Work Plan for the HRC includes the following ideas: September 11 - National Day of Service and Remembrance, The HRC would like to promote this day of service for the entire Golden Valley community by advertising and promoting residents to sign up for a volunteer shift from 6 to 8 pm at Second Harvest Heartland located in Golden Valley. Fall 2013 OR Winter 2014- Community viewing and discussion of the film "Minnesota Nice?" a 45-minute documentary film made by Edina High School graduate, Alec Fischer, that features interviews with students across the state, most of whom have been victims of bullying. The date for this event would be determined based on Mr. Fischer's availability as he has indicated that he is willing ta attend the event and participate in the discussion after the viewing. Attachment • Human Rights Commission Resolution 13-01, Resolution Recommending the City Council Publicly Proclaim that Golden Valley is a Welcoming City for all and Acknowledging the Minnesota Marriage Equality Act of 2013 (1 page) Resolution 13-01 July 30, 2013 Commissioner Burris introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING THE CITY COUNCIL PUBLICLY PROCLAIM THAT GOLDEN VALLEY IS A WELCOMING CITY FOR ALL AND ACKNOLEDGING THE MINNESOTA MARRIAGE EQUALITY ACT OF 2013 WHEREAS, the Minnesota Marriage Equality Act of 2013 is to be implemented and become the law af the State of Minnesota on August 1, 2013; and WHEREAS, this law effectively enables same-sex couples to legally marry in Minnesota and constitutes the "Rule of Law" as discussed in the Preamble to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights promulgated by the United Nations; and WHEREAS, the Golden Valley Human Rights Commission is charged with the responsibility of bringing the basic tenets of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights home to the citizens of Golden Valley. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Golden Valley Human Rights Commission recommends to the Golden Valley City Council that it consider and pass a resolution publicly proclaiming that Golden Valley is a welcoming City for all and acknawledging the implementation of the Act passed into law by the Minnesota State Legislature this year. Andy Snope, Chair ATTEST: Chantell Knauss, Staff Liaison The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Commissioner Johnson and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Burris, Buttress, Johnson, Jordan, Perkins, Reisner, and Snope; the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Chair and his signature attested by the Staff Liaison. �1��1 p� Cit y Administration/Council 763-593-8003/763-593-8109(fax) � -� � E .;: �._. . . ; �x,._m.�.��.�_�� ,�,.�:-� � .�� -�::�"� �'� ... �. � Executive Summary Golden Valley Council/Manager Meeting August 13, 2013 Agenda Item 2. City of Robbinsdale and Three Rivers Park District Nature Area Proposal Prepared By Thomas Burt, City Manager Summary The City of Robbinsdale and Three Rivers Park District approached the City of Golden Valley with the idea of taking over the management and programming of some nature areas/parks at the boarders of the two cities, The areas being considered are: Mary Hills Nature Area and Rice Lake Nature Area in Golden Valley; and Sochacki Park in Robbinsdale. The proposal will preserve the nature areas and provide naturalist programming. Members of the Three Rivers Park District will be present at the meeting and are looking for Council direction. �'"��'�' t3�. I'lanning Department 763-593-8095/763-593-8109{f�x) ': . 2��9��..� ..��:::;. :°.�r:��.i .. ..,...::"".�:-s-:�`�°"�"..:'� a.'�=�� ` � ,A r'�'��",�-M�:..�:..� ... �'��:._,. �. - . . s`. ��... . r .. .�......,,. .-� . � ^�� Executive Summary Golden Valley Council/Manager Meeting August 13, 2013 Agenda Item 3. Planning Commission Annual Report Prepared By ' lohn Kluchka, Planning Commission Chair Summary Golden Valley 2012 Planning Commission activities were diverse and active, and benefitted from dynamic participation from its members. As economic conditions have improved, our volume and balance of topics did shift. We observed topical trends, and also see opportunities to invest for future growth and expected change. Recommendations Many Planning Commission topics are worth further review based on trends and experience, and - we recommend that City Council offer direction for further consideration of these issues. While there are many on our list (available upon request), our top three include: 1. Review of zoning approaches for business that more dynamically balance business growth with mixed unit development as building trends and markets change. 2. Better establish plans and direction for locating areas and sites for affordable and senior housing. 3. Review of zoning approaches to major building height changes between neighboring zoning borders and whether there may be inappropriate differences in close proximity. 2012 Planning Commission Agenda Category Trends The attached detail report of our meeting topics includes these key categories: •Remodeling fssues (4 items) • Parking (2 items) • Light Rail Transit (1 item) • Development (7 items) • Subdivisions (4 items) • Ordinances and Process Issues (3 items) • Zoning Changes (5 items) Attachments 2012 Planning Commission Summary (4 pages) 2012 Planning Commission Summary January 9, 2012 PC Meeting Cancelled January 23, 2012 Informal Public Hearing — Planned Unit Development Amendment— Final Plan — 7200 Wayzata Blvd, Lupient Infiniti — PU-66 Amendment #4 - Recommended Approval (Remodeling) Informal Public Hearing — Planned Unit Development Amendment — Preliminary Plan — 123 Ottowa Ave. N., Breck School — PU-88 Amendment #1 — Recommended Approval (Remodeling) Informal Public Hearing — Zoning Code Text Amendment —Amending Section 11.70 "Off-Street Parking and Loading Regulations" —ZO00-89 — Tabled (Parking) January 30, 2012 Joint Meeting of the City Council, Planning Commission, Environmental Commission and Open Space and Recreation Commission - Bottineau Transitway Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) Comment Formulation Exercise — (Light Rai� Transit-LRT) February 13, 2012 Informal Public Hearing — Planned Unit Development Amendment— Preliminary Plan — 4900 Triton Drive (Eldridge 3�d Addition) — PU-109 - Recommended Approval (Development) February 27, 2012 PC Meeting Cancelled March 15, 2012 Informal Public Hearing — Subdivision — 15 Meadow Lane North — SU08-10 — Recommended Approval (Subdivision) March 26, 2012 Consideration of Resolution No. 12-01 Finding that the Redevelopment Plan for the I-394 Corridor Redevelopment Project Area (formerly known as the Golden Hills Redevelopment Project) Conforms to the City's Comprehensive Plan - Recommended Approval (Comp Plan) Continued Informal Public Hearing — Zoning Code Text Amendment —Amending Section 11.70 "Off-Street Parking and Loading Regulations" —ZO00-89 - Recommended Approval (Parking) April 9, 2012 Informal Public Hearing — Planned Unit Development Amendment — Final Plan — 123 Ottawa Ave. N. - Breck School — PU-88 Amendment#1 - Recommended Approval (Remodeling) April 23, 2012 PC Meeting Cancelled May 14, 2012 PC Meeting Cancelled May 21, 2012 PC Meeting Cancelled June 11, 2012 PC Meeting Cancelled June 25, 2012 Informal Public Hearing — Conditional Use Permit— 8806-8808 7th Ave N — Disturbia in Suburbia (Justin Smith) — Recreational Use in the Light Industrial Zoning District — CU-131 — Recommended Approval (Development) Informal Public Hearing — General Land Use Plan Map Amendment— 740 Douglas Drive North and 6100 & 6110 Olson Memorial Highway— CPAM-50 - To change the designation on the General Land Use Plan Map from Industrial to Commercial-Office — Tabled (Zoning) Informal Public Hearing — Property Rezonings — 740 Douglas Drive North and 6100 & 6110 Olson Memorial Highway — Z012-18 - To rezone the properties from Industrial to Business and Professional Offices — Tabled (Zoning) Discussion Item - Proposed New Zoning District — Light Commercial — Tabled (Zoning) July 9, 2012 Informal Public Hearing — Minor Subdivision — 6601 and 6621 Medicine Lake Road — Savanah Estates — SU14- 14 — Recommended Approval (Subdivision) Informal Public Hearing — General Land Use Plan Map Amendment — 7345 Country Club Drive — CPAM-51 - (Schuller's) -To change the designation on the General Land Use Plan Map from Low Density Residential to Commercial- Retail - Recommended Denial (Remodeling and Zoning) July 23, 2012 PC Meeting Cancelled August 13, 2012 Informal Public Hearing — Conditional Use Permit— 8806 7th Ave N — Minnesota School of Basketball — Recreational Use in the Light Industrial Zoning District — CU-132 — Recommended Approval (Development) Informal Public Hearing — General Land Use Plan Map Amendment — 9130 & 9220 Olson Memorial Highway— CPAM-52 - To change the designation on the General Land Use Plan Map from Commercial-Retail to Residential-High Density— Recommended Approval (Zoning) Informal Public Hearing — Property Rezoning — 9130 & 9220 Olson Memorial Highway— Z022-01 - Tiburon 55, LLC - To rezone the properties from Commercial to High Density Residential (R-4) - Recommended Approval (Zoning) August 27, 2012 Informal Public Hearing — Planned Unit Development (PUD) — 600 Boone Avenue North — Boone Avenue Convenience Center— PU-110 — Recommended Approval (Development) Informal Public Hearing — Minor Subdivision — 1540 and 1550 St. Croix Circle — Golden View Addition — SU06- 04 — Recommended Approval (Subdivision) Informal Public Hearing — Planned Unit Development— Final Plan — 4900 Triton Drive (Eldridge 3rd Addition)— PU-109 - Recommended Approval (Development) September 10, 2012 Informal Public Hearing — Preliminary Plan Review— Planned Unit Development (PUD) — 9130 & 9220 Olson Memorial Highway - The Tiburon — PU-111 — Recommended Approval (Development) September 24, 2012 PC Meeting Cancelled October 8, 2012 Brainstorming - 2013 Planning Commission Meeting Schedule, PUD Process, Solar Access Ordinance, Tree House/Play Structure Regulations (Process & Ordinances) October 22, 2012 Presentation of 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program—Sue Virnig, City Finance Director— Recommended Approval (Process) Informal Public Hearing — Planned Unit Development (PUD) — 600 Boone Avenue North — Boone Avenue Convenience Center— PU-110 — Final Plan - Recommended Approval (Development) November 5, 2012 Informal Public Hearing — Planned Unit Development (PUD) — Northwest Corner I-394 and Highway 100 — The 3.9.4 Apartments — PU-112 — Preliminary Plan — Recommended Approval (Development) Informal Public Hearing — Minor Subdivision — Glenwood Avenue and Harold Avenue — Olin Woods — SU17-10 - Recommended Approval (Subdivision) November 26, 2012 Consideration of Resolution No. 12-01 Finding that the Redevelopment Plan for the Highway 55 West Redevelopment Project Area and the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing (Renewal and Renovation) District No. 1 Conform to the General Plan for the Development and Redevelopment of the City, as Amended (Amended 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update) - Recommended Approval (Process) December 10, 2012 PC Meeting Cancelled December 27, 2012 PC Meeting Cancelled �;l��1 �� ' � �� Fire Department �� - - - - 763 593 8079/763 593 8098(fax) Executive Summary Golden Valley Council/Manager Meeting August 13, 2013 Agenda Item 4. Proposed City Code Amendment -Section 10.40- Location of Containers - Residential Zoning Districts Prepared By Mark Kuhnly, Fire Chief Dave Gustafson, Fire/Property Maintenance Specialist Summary Staff is receiving an increase in the number of complaints about trash, recycling and yard waste containers that are being left out in view of the public. Currently City Code Section 10.40, Subdivision 5 states: Containers shall be stored no more than three (3J feet from the primary or accessory structure and shall at all times be located behind the front of the primary structure. In some cases, there is some confusian as to exactly where the front of the primary structure is located in conjunction with the street and residents are interpreting the code in several ways. In order to better clarify this, we are proposing the following language change to the ordinance: Subdivision 5. Location of Containers- Residential Zoning Districts Containers shall be stored no more than three (3)feet from the primary or accessory structure and shall at all times be located °��out of view from public ri�ht-of-way. Containers may be placed at the curb from 5 pm the day prior to collection to 9 pm the day of collection. By amending this portion of the Residential Property Maintenance Code, the containers can be placed inside of the garage or left outside next to the primary structure as long as they are screened from view of the public right-of-way. This would also facilitate those properties where it is not feasible to store the containers outside due to the topography of the land. Staff is developing a communications plan and will be finalized if this proposed code amendment is approved by City Council. The communications plan includes: focus areas, mission, goals and objectives, audience identification, key messages and potential strategies. �,�� : Public Warks Departrnent ?63-593-8030/763-593-3988(fax) Executive Summary Golden Valley Council/Manager Meeting August 13, 2013 Agenda Item 5. Review of Organized Solid Waste Process Prepared By Jeannine Clancy, Director of Public Works Mark Ray, PE, Engineer/Recycling Coordinator Summary In 20Q9, the City Council requested that the Environmenta) Commission study the City's current solid waste handling and recycling programs and compare them to other communities. To gather information, the Environmental Commission reviewed information from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), held a panel discussion with other cities (Maplewood, St. Louis Park, Robbinsdale and Edina), and interviewed trash haulers. Two major items resulted from the Environmental Commission's study. First, its input regarding desired components of the recycling program was integrated into the City's negotiated contract for curbside recycling collection. The City's contract with Allied Waste, which began service January 1, 2012, included recommendations such as wheeled carts (with various size options), more items accepted for recycling, and 100% revenue sharing. In comparing the amount of material recycled under the old contract (2011)to the new contract (2012), the tonnage was up 795,520 pounds (20%). Secondly, on December 20, 2011, the City Council adopted changes to the City code regarding waste hauler contract and license requirements. These requirements included: 1. Requiring haulers to offer separate containers for yard waste. 2. Requiring the solid waste and yard waste containers used in the City to be made from at least 50% of post-consumer recycled material. 3. Requiring haulers to pick up yard waste between May 1 and November 1, and as otherwise specified by the City. 4. Requiring haulers to provide "valet" (door-side pickup) for senior and physically disabled citizens. At the February 9, 2013 meeting, the City Council adopted the goal of starting the state statutory public hearing process to consider implementing single hauler garbage/recycling collection in Golden Valley. Early this summer,the State of Minnesota passed a new law regarding the process required for organizing collection. From the League af Minnesota Cities Website: (http:/�www.f mc.or�/pa�e/1/�arba�e-collection.is�) The new law replaces the 180-day process for adopting organized collection with a 60-day negotiation period. League-supported legislation that simplifies the process for adopting organized solid waste collection became law effective May 8. The new law (Chapter 45) eliminates the cumbersome 180-day process for adopting organized collection, and replaces it with a 60- day negotiation period between a city and its licensed collectors. The new process is designed to give the current collectors the first chance to develop a proposal for organized collection, If the 60-day negotiation period ends without an agreement, a city can continue the process by adopting a resolution to form a committee to study organized collection and make recommendations, Cities that have already organized collection are exempt from the new law. Their current organized collection methods continue to govern. Steps for organizing collection The steps for adopting organized solid waste collection under the new law are as follows: 1. Notice to public and licensed collectors Before forming a committee to study organized collection, a city with more than one licensed collector must notify the public and its licensed collectors that it is considering organizing collection. The new law does not specify how notice should be provided. The League recommends providing both published notice and individual mailed notice to each licensed collector. 2. Sixty-dav ne�otiation period After a city provides notice of its intent to consider organizing collection, it must provide a 60-day negotiation period that is exclusive between the city and its licensed collectors. A city is not required to reach an agreement during this period, The purpose of the negotiation period is to allow licensed collectors to develop a proposal in which they, as members of an organization of collectors, collect solid waste from designated sections of the city. The proposal must addresses specific issues set out in the new law. If an agreement is reached with a city's licensed collectors, it must be effective for three to seven years. The city must provide public notice and hold at least one public hearing before implementing the agreement. Organized collection cannot begin until at least six months after the effective date of the city's decision to implement organized collection. 3. Committee formation If a city does not reach an agreement with its licensed collectors during the negatiation period, it can form—by resolution—an "organized collection options committee"to study various methods of organizing collection and issue a report. The city council appoints the committee members, and the committee is subject to the Open Meeting Law. The committee must examine different methods of organizing collection (two of which are specified in the law); establish a list of criteria for evaluating the different methods of callection; collect information from ather cities and towns with organized collection; and seek input at a minimum from the city council, the local official responsible for solid waste issues, licensed solid waste and recycling collectors, and city residents. 4. Public notice, public hearin�, and implementation A city must provide public notice and hold at least one public hearing before deciding to implement organized collection. Organized collection cannot begin until at least six months after the effective date of the city's decision to implement organized collection. Finally, the City included questions about organized hauling in its 2013 City survey. Please see the attached results. Attachments • League of Minnesota Cities, 2013 Law Summaries, Final Legislative Action, Page 24 (1 page) • Presentation by Trudy Richter; Richardson, Richter &Associates, Inc.; entitled "Options for Implementing the Amended Organized Collection Law in Your City," July 25, 2013 (12 pages) • City of Golden Valley Survey, 2013, Questions 84-86 (1 page) Metro water group sunset extended �tarious methods of organizing collection and issue Chapter 19{*f-IF83�4/SFS1S)allows the Metropoli- a report.The city conncil appoints the committee tan Council to continue to operate thc Metropolitan members,and the comrnittee is subject to the Open Area Water Supply Advisory Cornmittee through 2016, Meeting Law:The cornmittee must e�ramine different as described in Ml`�!Stat§473.1565,subdivision 2.T'his methods of organizing collection(two of which are applies onty tp the seven-counry metro area.Effedive retro- specified in the law);establish a list of criteria for uctively jron�Dec.31,2012. (C,p evaluating the different methods of collection;collect information from orher cities and towns with organized 1$Q-day process for adopting organized collection collection;and seek input at a minunum from the city replaced with 6U-day negotiation period caune.�il,th�local n�cial responsible for solid vv�aste Chapter 45 (*SFSl Q/HF128)elivunates the cumbersome issues,licenscd solid v�+aste and recycling collectors,and 1$0-day pivicess f�r adapting orgaxuzed collecdon,and ciry residents. replaces it with a 6U-day negotiation period between a city * Public notice,pub�ic heering,and implementa- and its licensed callectors.The new process is designed to tion.A city must pravide puhlic notice and hold at give the current collectors the farst chance to develop a least ane publac hearing hefore deciding to implement proposal for arganized collection.If the 60-day negotiation organized collecdon.Organized collection cannot begin periad ends without an agreement,a city can continue the until at least six months a£ter the effective date of the process by adopting a resolution to form a coiiunittee to city's decision to unplement arganizcd collcction. scudy organized callection and make recommendations. E�'ective May 8,2013. {C,J} Ciries that hav�already organized co]lectian are exem�t from the new lawcTheir cur�nt organized collection Emvironment trttst fund projeets methods continae to gavern. Chapter 52(*HF1113I5F987)is the annual package The steps for adopting organized solid waste collec- Q{p��ects funded from the environment and natural � tion undcr the new law are as follows: resources trust fund,which is funded through lattery pm- • Notice to public and licensed collectors.Before ceeds.The Legislaave Gitizens Commission an Minnesota forming a committee to study organized callection,a Resources(LCCMR) develqps che recommendarion for a city with more than one licensed collector must nodfy �de range af research and projects related to the envimn- the pu'�li�and its licensed eolleetors tt�at ic is eonsider- �ent.Several of this year's approved projects are of interest ing organizing coJ.lection.The new]aw does not specify ta cities. how notice should be pzavided.The League recom- . County gealogic attases.Subd.3(b) provides�1.2 mends p:nviding bath pubGshed notice and individual ��on ro the Unive�sity of Minnesota to continue to mailed notice to each licer�sed collector. accelerate comp3edon of county geofogic atlases. • Sixty-day negotiation period.After a city provides . SpeciSed couaty gealogic attases.Subd.3(c)pm- notice of its inCent to cansider oxganizing callection,it y�des$1.2 milGon to the University of Minnesata for inust pmvide a fi0-day negatiatic�n period that is exclusive additianal work on the counry geologic atlases of Hous- betwcen the city°and its licensed collectocs.A city is not tan and Winona Counties. required to reach an agreement during this period. . �{iedand inventory. Subd.3(d)pravides$1 million to � The purpose of khe negatiadon period is to allow the Depamn.ent of Natural Resourcts for conrinued licensed collectors to develop a praposal in which the}; �„�ork on a statewide wetland irrventory. as members ofan organizatian of callectars,collect , Hydrogen geueration frorn wastewater.Subd.5(� solid waste from dssignated sections of the city.The p�vides R240,d00 ta the Universiry af Ivtinnesota to propasal must ad+dresses s�iecific issues set out in the �search uses of selected bacteria and polymer mem- new lavr. branes being used to generate hydrogen frnm wastewater. � lf an agreement is reached with a city's licensed col- . �merald ash borer.5ubd.6(c}provides$600,OQ0 to lect�rs,it must be effective for three tn seven years. �e University of Minnesota and the Department of The city must provide public notice and hald at least p��iculture to evaluate and implement detection options ane public hearing before implementing the agrLe- �'or emerald ash borer. ment.Organized collectian cannot begin unp;at least six months after the effective date of the city's decision Effecrive July 1,2013,(CJ} ta implement organized collecuon. � Carnmittee formadon. lf a city does not reach Omnit��us lands bill an agreement wit�'�its licensed collectors during th� Chapter 73(*HF740fSF88b)is the omnibus lands bill. nrgotiation period,it can Eorm—b�resoIution—an �egislative approval is needed to authorize the sale of tax- `brganized collecdon options corrunittee"to study �Q�eited parcels bordering pubtic waters.The bill also con- tains same policy changes reiated ta the acquisition and Page 24 Wv League of Minnesota Citles W � � . � � � V E'"� ��''''1 � 1 n I�I /"'� • � �� Cl� � � � � � � � � a� � � � a.� � � �, � � � � � � � • � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � rti � � � � *� � � � � o � � � � � � a� � � � � � o � � • �--� � +-' cv . � � � C� V1 � � � W � � � � � � � � � � � � *'" � � � � � � � � � � � � � o �, a� � -� �' �° v� � � � � � � � � C� -� �' � . ,"� b�Jp .�' ,.� � � � � � i� � � � � C) � cv � c.� c� .� � �, o ,� � � � a� � � +� +� ,s� �.+ � cv � •� � � .� C� C � ,�.' cv � .-+ � p b�D � � � � � � � � � � � � � � N .,� i-.� . � � ''"'' �+ � O � � � � fl � � � • ''-� "� c� r�+ w � � � � � � r...� .�, cc� .F,.., -�—� .�,, � � c� v� G� .�—� � � 'dy p �-'�� C1� � � .� � � � M� ! ! i � '�"� � � '� �1 � a t� � � � � � � a � � � � � � � �, � � � . ,..., -�-� � •�, � � � � ' ''� •*"' � v� .�..� �* � � � .. � � � ,� '� � �, � � C3 � � '� � �° � � � a� � . ., � � � � V1 � � h V1 • � +�"'� � � .�,� � � � � � � � � � � � � ,� �#-+ �i � � � � � • � � c.� � t�f1 � Ct� � "N t� �� c� �"i •� � C� � c,�' Cr3 C� �� , �, � � , c.� � � b,,o +� �" � � � � b�A b�D � b�p C7 c�7 �� ,,-� . • � u� � �-' � � •� •� •� . . � � � a � ° � � � u u -� + � � � � � a � � � � � � � � � � � � � � w � � � � � � C� � � • +�► • • � � • i � � v � � � � o ,� � � � � o � � •� ,� � (� ,� p '� � o � � � � o � � � • s� a� � � � � � � � a � � � a� �� „� �., �, � Rt � ,� cts � � � �p a3 a� "� � c�4 •� c� � u� cct '�-� � �-+ ,� � � � � p� � `� � '� r,�j,, c� O � � � �' "�'' a � � ��"' � � � � � � � � � • . �i � � � G�i � ��4� � � � � � � � o � ''� � � � � � � .�, 4.� '~ °' � � •,� � � � ''� �� b`�D � �i �+ � � � � U � ,°? � . '� � '� •r� '� � '.� � o � � � � � � � � � � �' a �-, � � � :� � � '�S � .,v� � CSS CU � �� v� � � Q� rQ �"' .� O �''� t�'+ ��., +�.+ C�' � � � � � � p ��'' � � � � � � V� � � � tU �' G� Q V �..r � ` ' W �i � �r �i :E � � �O d�i � � � 1 i I I 1 � � . T� � V1 � T � . .�..i �i � � � �� .� �, � � �; � �nc� cu . o � � � '� y--� � � . � � � °' ° � � � � �� .-� � "� � � � � � o ,� � � .� � a� n .� � � � ,� � G� � v� U � .� C� . . �i � �+-�+ � � CC� � •.��+ � � � � � �' i-i i-� � � 4� � Q� a `� � o ".� � � v � � O � � , v� r--� t� � .i-+ a � '�' � � 4�.� � � � � � � � � � � v� � � �+ O 4� � .�..� �+ '�„�'♦ � •�-+ �-+ b�D c� � tti � ,s�� +-+ c� 'a-' c,.. '� � e� � � � ,� � �,,, �,��,, fi� a� � � � � A � a� � .'� c� � � � I I � . • ,� � +� � � 4� c� � � '�' � � �' � �p � � � � � � � E� a,, � , Q c� � �+ � +�' � +,, ' ' .#—+ q,� tt� � � a � � • '"'� � 4� *�-�+ 4� CL3 � � �C1�� .� r--a .c.a �J� � i� T� � � ^ � p r,� �'` � -N ct� � � c� � � C) `+-' � � � � � � � a� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � Q � ° � � � � � � � q� � ,� �., �► c.� � � � a .� � v� � � o 0 � � � � � �, � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � -� � � � � � � .�, � � � � N �..� � � � � CL� �'"� � .� c� � � c� o � r�° � � � t�S � � '�"' � •� �.' -E-� � � � � � � � � � r�� cv � ,,� � � c� � � � -� +� 4� � � .� � � �v � � � � � +� � �U `� � � Q . �, � � � ;� � � � � o c� � � � � � � � � � � +� � � � � � . . � � � � O � .� p � � � � � � .� � � � � � � o b� Q � � � � � � � � ` ~ p � � � �"� +-+ N ,� O C� � C,� � o � � � o � �..� ,,� � � r--� � ;+-+ .�.� +� � � � � � � ; � � � � � � � � � � 4� � •� � � � `� o � � � o � � .� � � � � � � � � � � � c�v �, � o � � � � � 4,� O '� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �' � � ,� � `� � '� � ° �s � � � ,� � � � .� � � � � � � � � � � ��., � b,+p +-+ '—' cU �s • � '� � � � `w � ,—� . �s � � � � � � � � ;,� �o � � � .Q � ,� � a�o � ,,5� rt� O �...� a �. � � c,, .� �"' `� �'' C.) ►� �J U � •� � � � � � �c � w � � � .� � � � � . . � � � Q,� cr� ,� � r� � � � * � � � � 4� � � � � � � � a � � � � � „� � o �,,q +C7 b�A ., .�,,, `�"' � o .� � °� � •� � �..� • � � :� .� 'c� � � �s r--.� � • � S� � �' � C� .�, � � ,� ^ '� � � -N c� � ,s,,,� �j ,� Q � � � � �+ .�.� � � � c� .�, �? � � � '.t� � � v +� � t� � � (�' � q,� � �.�-�+ � •� � � � � � � p � � � � b�0 � � --� c� � � � � � � � • a� � � � � � � +-� � � � a.� � .r, � � � � � � � � � � � �i Q„� � � � ,�., � O � +� � � t� +.� ,� � �—.+ � Q.� t� .�-�+ ;-.� v� .r., C� � 4� � � � � � � c� � � � c� � �v +.� o � � � � � � � � � � C� � �u � � 4.� � � � b�o � c� *� � o +-� � � �✓ �! � � � r�—� �� • • . . • W � �♦ � � � � � � � � � o -I--� '� � C� v ,�''`S' '� � � � � .� � � CU �:� � � t� .� c�u C"� (� � � •a c�,� � � � � '�"' � . . .� � '� � � � � � � � � V a � � � a � ,� . . � .� ,�' o � � � � r.....� �� cv � -� �--.� �y � •� � � � o � a CC� � .�,, .� ►.� � ,o � � o� � � � � q� � � � � w K t� � � � � •� .� � •� �i' i-' � � � � � � � � � � � � �..� � �, � � � � � � � `� � �' �,,,� � �., � '� � � � '� � � v � o �° •� � � � � � � � � � � � a� � a � .� � t�t� C�7 .�-� •� '� � c� � O � �'� � � '� � ,� � � � C� � � c� � � •� �--i ..;,; c� � � � � `� � U � � •� sv a� � v O � v� s�.' °' �+ .� � � .Q; ''`♦ � � ,� � c� �--� '�+-'+ � :--� .,.., .,�, � :� � v� v� � � � � � � � � � °� � c� � � � � � a� a� � � � � � � o o a� a� a� � � � � � � � c� V � � a �--� �� Q � � `� I I I I I � � � �.} i � � � � �i+� � � � � � � � � 43 ,� ,S� . � � � � � � � � � � 4� �s �' � +� � � � � o � � � � � +-' � '� � � � � '� „i c� -� � � � �� a� � � v � � .� � :� � � .� r-'� � � � � � •� • ,...� � ,� .� � Q V C,� .N .� � .p 4� � � � � � � � � t� '� � •►-� •� � a.� � � � � �, � �..� � � c� c� �„� ,r,, a � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � cv � � � r"� , ,�,,,, (� � � fl � � � � � � � � � � � o a� � � o � �..� � � � �� c.� +� i i • � V `^�/ r � `��+ O f�l M"" � �P'� r►`.�,,�'� C"� �i „� r�"'# U"��' � � � � � � '� � C�,, � � � � � � � � � ,� � •� dj � � � p 43 p '_'' � � � � � � � � � C'►-• � :� "� � � n c�.� t�o � � �+-� � 4j � 0 � � � '� � � ,� � �`' �., �-�+ .�-+ Cl� O �� ;� � � '� .� .� �� o � � � � � � � � �s Qa o � � oa� � � .� � � � 4 � � � � � � Q� ,� � � cQ �, � q�l �+ � c� c� � � � � „� a-' cn � � t�-�+ 43 � � :�'� � � c1 '� � � � � � U �� E.—� q.� `r�' c� � ,�, � � � � ..`� c� � aA.a.`� � a�o a� '� � °� r.-��`'�; � ,� � � � � '� � � '�r Q„) � `+'� � � � C,� �..� '� *�-� U -�-� 4,,� c%� ,{,,,� .� •�—+ Q� � � � � .� �� r � � �-+ � � � t� '�' � � '-� � � � ,� � � ,� � � c� � .� � � � � � � � � � ,� v � � � � +-� � � � � � o � c� � � .� •,.., � � c�t � . ►�--� C.a � �"� •� c.� � �i t:� .� -�-� t� . • • • ti.i"+V � •� � •1� � � r�, }'"� � �• � � •�-�+ � � � ~ � � � ii i � � �...� � .� � � U -�-� ,a,� •� o � � *� � 4� � � � � � � � � � � c�i Ca � cv c°� .v � �,o � ,� � � • � � �+ .� � � r. 00 � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � .� � �„ � �, �V � � �--� cv � . '� .a � � �, � � �, � � ,�,,, �� n �, ^ .� • C� r,� � .� � � ,�, .� �"'� � E-♦ t� �t- v� ° � C� Ca � � Most communities have one of two systems for garbage collection. In a multiple collection system, like the City of Golden Valley, residents choose their hauler from several different companies serving the community. Other cities use an organized collection system,where the City contracts with one hauler for all or part of the city. In a multiple collection system, residents have the ability to choose, but many neighborhoods may have numerous trucks collecting garbage on their street at different times throughout the day. In an organized collection system, all residents are assigned a specific hauler, but only that company's truck appears in the neighborhood on a specific day. 84.Would you favor or oppose the City of Golden Valley changing from the current system in which residents may choose from several different haulers to a system where the City chooses a hauler for all or part of the C+ty?(WAIT FOR RESPpNSE) Do you feel strongly that way? STRONGLY FAVOR 5% FAVOR 34% OPPOSE 34% STRONGLY OPPOSE 20% DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 7% IF A RESPONSE IS GIVEN,ASK: (n=372) 85.Why do you feel that way? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 1% WANT CHOICE 36% LIKE CURRENT HAULER 18% CHOICE IS CHEAPER 9% ORGANIZED CHEAPER 12% LESS TRUCK TRAFFIC 20% LESS ROAD MAINTENANCE 4% SCATfERED 1% In another option,the City could continue to give residents the option of choosing their own hauler, but require all haulers to pick-up garbage on the same day in a neighborhood. 86.Would you favor or oppose the City of Golden Valley continuing to allow residents to choose their own hauler, but require all haulers to pick-up garbage on the same day in a neighborhood?(WAIT FOR RESPONSE) Do you feel Strongly that way? STRONGLY FAVOR 12% FAVOR 51% OPPQSE 21% STRONGLY OPPOSE 7% DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 10% �� y �� -�...� k �, Public Works Department . 763-593-8030/763-593-39$8(fax) � - _.y_ .- -. �... � � , ��. ��_... � .x.:. �.. �� .� � . � a.. � . Executive Summary Golden Valley Council/Manager Meeting August 13, 2013 Agenda Item 6. Installation of Bike Racks at City Parks Prepared By leannine Clancy, Director of Public Wr�rks Jeff Oliver, PE, City Engineer Eric Seaburg, EIT, Engineer Summary As requested by Council Member Schmidgall, staff has identified locations for bicycle racks and prepared a cost estimate to have the racks installed. As shown on the attached map, there are 20 possible park locations for racks. The cost estimate for bike racks Mas been based upon standard "U" shaped racks as shown on the attached exhibit. Based upon the installation of 20 racks, the total estimated cost for installation is $8,250. Attachments • Bike Rack Location Map (1 page) • Bike Rack photo (1 page) • Cost Estimate (1 page) ;-rrY or _�.rrv or � ��rY ��r r� ��p��oTx- . ti�i�.i OL'IS P;Vi6: 1'1�1'I�tnUlll . � � , .... �-� .�.._-___"_ ___"_.._ '_"_.._._"'_"_' _ � "_"_" ___"� .___ .. _...._ _ . .. _.. __""_ _ ^ i.._.._'"_""""_"_"_"""_"" � _"'_" _ _"_"_"_"_"_' _ _ O"_"'_'"_"_"' "_" " '" f ,. � �p � �''� Mendelssohn Ave � i _ ; �, -� r d ; _ - ; � � �e � � a ; _ � e c � 7C q ; _ � a �D x. � � r i o �� . � � i 7 � � k �c � �p� � _ � �� ` :,y� � p'�, Decatur Ave N � � � � i � c � � �'d � � � � � (� � � Y '; t � e �p O ;,�. 7 � r• ti � O fD � Boone Ave N � _ . Q. ; ¢ � � General ills Bl�. � � � r�"""`n� (p ! �' ; . _. —• � ! �s , ..� , < j ,��..__��.-�� '� � � � N � � � x � ' � � � Wisco in � a � O �G "� � � R�. � � O .�-* � Ave � � '� � i � N � � � � r°� � I_ ,, i � � .. ! Winnetka livf�. � � � ! Winnetk ve � Winnetka Ave N � �j I � �, \ � � ..,. e N � .. W I I � � h' � I � ¢ _ .� Rhode l � � "�� x Rhode ; �� Isiand � \ Island Ave ! � x c� �_ ` � i � w Ave o�,, � , z 'i .�^. o a ; j � � ,�,� i � �' � o w � _ � Nevada Ave N i _ i C c � � � � � � i - � Louisiana � K � � � � � ' �e �o, : � � � r --- _ j Ave S "!� � ; r ` � � N � o ; I .. jerseY O tr' � � p ' _ � Ave N 3 C � �� a � � r tA • � � � � � a ! - rr � ° �„ � � ° � � � " i J � Florida po+ O � j� � � � - i N � � i � � i AVe S �� :� � i � ¢ °' i , � Dougias Dr N I � Douglas Dr N � w !� ' � � Q � j , .. .., � �, s � ; _ � � , � o o :� � � �� . � � c. � � � � � . � � a � -' _ ' � o � `Q � Zane Ave N � i � ... ,.^ i .- i � y � � � � � , � G� i � d � � � ,C . ,_ � i], •� �, � - � 7Lenia Ave S �° � � � j i_ Turners y � ; j � Crossroad N , `� � � , �.. ..-- -------.. � .._.._..-------------••� ; � :..�-- ° � � : ,. �� , r � � � ' �� , �i � ,� ;� : � ; � �,. �►\ � �� ; � � �� , , , . , .�� . , . ; , � � �- ------- -�' ''�� K i _�_ � �:,: � � � : � j � � p, � �' j , }�., � Z � � � n i i ` ' ° Q 7C ; . Z ` � � � � Noble Ave N �. � i � O � � � � ; � � ; N �� O � •• j O � . � � . � � .,�,�_,,�:�� , � , � � ��, � � , � � .'� °.: � , � � i' _ < ------.._-- - - ------- ._.._.._.�-==--�.-_-_._ i. � � -� � ,.., o • i - i � O � � � � j . .r "� , . MeadowLn x,�a� �� _ � � �� ' <�irv �>i� a��i;r:i��tii>:�� F i � � ^*�za f i i � �°' \�� i r` ; � � ' � i _. L_ ._.._.._.� '_"_"_"_"_"_ . . ___"_, � ' �_-_._. � F .'�e�`Y�^ � �^, I I �i/ � ��i�� .>r n-�i�rArc>t.is ; � %�� i � i � . (p i � x 1 � �� . � I � 4 � � � — . I . ,:..,, _..:;,. ,...., ,...- , ,.,.. ., I - . � , � ,��" �� ; � � � •° ' �" enith ve N � � � �� i N„ �� . . - � — i � �` I - � , x : � . �"r,:.. � .. � i ._.. ___ ____.____"__ '� 'y�____ ___x'_. �� ..__=e��L�_'_"_"_"_"_"_ _ _.'_"_"_ _'_'__"_"( ]1\ (11 �1 I M1 N F..�P(17.I S .�... . C'I I�l' Ok' MINNBAPOI.IS o� ■� �a3; � /r o m � m o G�`�� ' °i � � � o r-� `D 3 m'n j � � A � � 7 N "";'. � A� � y �o� � o � o = -� � �• � � O � �`� w s o v v �, � � �� o�� ,p : �� `° o -� y � � � � � o �;o .�� ; �, � �o� � �: � � �. � � � � � ��o - � � —. � �..+ � v , �` W � O � 'a � � � ,� `` `° 3 7� o � y �D ` � � � � �� ; � � � �� . � . ` ��•.�...,,_ �.�__""'��. � �-� ,,,,,�� . ,�, , .�...., .�. ... , ,�.�,., „ � ' ��'` ^ - . . � °.� �, « , � , .�-�...� �- , .„ � .�._ � , _ ��.�..� ,�. a � �,. � r > .. �.�.�..,,,.,�,., ,�.. . ` �,�,„�,� „ `�„„. ��,�„�,��... w � �, � . �� , +�"""�,,.,�..,,. „ , �„� � � �� ,�� ... t�, � ".�,,, � a . �. � . '�'� �� u �K F.� . � � "�M�ywr, `�. . . :aw.�� . . ' ..., w,i � . ��:� .�y; , � ., �,�✓,-� m s�y! . ' � �.. {�, � ,,,..�• � "__, ..� . . w , . � �� . � �1�� .. � � - '"'+... '�� ...,` . ._� � � � H c � 0 ao u c m 'a ; a � � o � � 1A � � G � � U y C Q � * O O O Q C d O C7 � t�A � O tl') tN � N O �l'f N !'� 1'� 00 C� �,I? iJ? �i/f iJY iN� f0 ♦-+ O H � .�r t�o � F- C7 N Y V t0 � Q7 � A � � G � a � a� u `� � � N ,rA C v � a � � � °- � a� t0 U E �c �° �° �, °° � o � h � ei N a+ � U %" � � � W J W Q � N ei �-i � . �� i. Finance Department 763-593-8413/763-593-8109(fax) <.:: � �,�� ° ��r��-�= �r��s_�.: �� __ �: .�� :.� .. . Executive Summary Golden Vatiey Councit/Manager Meeting August 13, 2013 Agenda item 7. Biennial 2014-2015 Proposed General Fund Budget Prepared By Sue Virnig, Finance Director Summary At the August 13 Council/Manager meeting, the Council will be reviewing the following divisions: -Public Works Administration (035) -Engineering (036) -Street Maintenance (037) -Park Maintenance (067) -Police (022) -Capital Improvement Program Sections (2014-2015): � Equipment � Buildings � Parks -Revenue -General Fund - Fund Balance -Estimated Tax Impact Appropriate staff will be in attendance to discuss the proposed budgets for these divisions and answer questions from the Council. Attachments • Bring your Biennial 2014-2015 Proposed General Fund Budget (previously distributed) �Z��1 t�� _ . City Administration/Council 763-593-8003/763-593-8109(fax) ��a° ..�..�ry�. ��, ,��=, 3.e T �_ �_ ,�.�.e_� e ° � Executive Summary Goiden Valley Council/Manager Meeting August 13, 2013 Agenda Item 8. Bottineau Light Rail Transit Planning Advisory Committee Appointments Prepared By Thomas Burt, City Manager Summary At the August 7 City Council meeting the Council adopted Resolution 13-76, Resalution Establishing the Bottineau Light Rail Transit (LRT) Planning Advisory Cammittee. It was determined that the Bottineau LRT Planning Advisory Committee include the following representatives: 2 members of the Planning Commission (will be determined at 8/12 meeting) 2 members of the Environmental Commission (Jim Stremmel and Debra Yahle) 2 members of the Open Space and Recreation Commission (Gillian Rosenquist and Dan Steinberg) 2 residents who live east of Highway 100 and north of Highway 55 2 members of the business community City Counci) Members �he deadline for submission of letters of interest was July 26 and seven letters have been received. Staff is seeking Council direction to determine how to review the letters of interest and either make appointment recommendations on August 13, or conduct interviews in order to make appointments at the August 20 City Council meeting.