Loading...
12-03-13 CC Agenda Packet (entire) AGENDA Regular Meeting of the City Council Golden Valley City Hall 7800 Golden Valley Road Council Chamber December 3, 2013 6:30 pm The Council may consider item numbers 1, 2, 3, 5 and 6 prior to the public hearings scheduled at 7 pm 1. CALL TO ORDER PAGES A. Roll Call B. Pledge of Allegiance C. Presentation of Envision Award - Curt And Jayne Olson Family, Rob And Sue 3 Wheaton Family, Katie Murphy Design LLC, And Trees For Tyrol Donors D. Oath of Office - Police Officers Adam Olson and Dana Bokusky 4 E. Recognition of David Hanson for Services Provided to City of Golden Valley and 5-7 Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission 13-103 F. Receipt of Human Services Fund 2014 Allocation Report 8-9 2. ADDITIONS AND CORRECTIONS TO AGENDA 3. CONSENT AGENDA Approval of Consent Agenda -All items listed under this heading are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no discussion of these items unless a Council Member or citizen so requests in which event the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda. A. Approval of Minutes - City Council Meeting - October 1, 2013 10-18 B. Approval of Check Register 19 C. Minutes of Boards and Commissions 1. Planning Commission - October 14, 2013 20-34 2. Joint Water Commission - August 7, 2013 35-36 3. Human Rights Commission - September 24, 2013 37-41 4. Environmental Commission - September 23, 2013 42-43 5. Human Services Fund - October 14, 2013 44 6. Envision Connection Project Executive Board - September 19, 2013 45-47 D. Emails, Letters and/or Petitions 1. Email from Kyle Turner Regarding Resignation from Environmental 48 Commission E. Approval of 2014-2018 Capital Improvement Program 13-104 49-51 F. Adoption of 2014-2015 Budget for Enterprise, Special Revenue and Internal Services 52-53 Funds 13-105 G. Second Consideration - Ordinance #512 - Establishing 2014 Master Fee Schedule 54-73 H. Approval of Use of an Affordable Housing Incentive Fund (AHIF) Loan for the 74-75 Property Located at 2913 Orchard Avenue North 13-106 I. Authorization to Sign Amended PUD Permit - Room & Board - PUD #79 - 76-79 Amendment#4 3. CONSENT AGENDA - CONTINUED J. Approval of Conditional Extensior� for Filing of Plat and Submitting Final PUD Plan 80-83 Application - PUD #107 - The Towers at West End - Southwest Quadrant of I-394 and Highway 100 - Duke Realty, Applicant K. Authorization to Sign Amended Agreement with Bassett Creek Watershed 84-94 Management Commission and WSB &Associates, Inc. for Feasibility Study for 2015 Bassett Creek Main Stem Restoration Project 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS 7 PM A. Public Hearing -Adoption of 2013 Property Tax Levy Payable 2014 and 2014-2015 95-98 General Fund Budget 13-107 and 13-108 B. Continued Public Hearing - Easement Vacations to Vacate Alley and Easements in 99 the Plats of Spring Green South and Registered Land Survey No. 106 5. OLD BUSINESS 6. NEW BUSINESS A. Announcements of Meetings B. Mayor and Council Communications 7. ADJOURNMENT ���� �� ';, City Administration/Cauncil 763-593-8003/763-593-8109(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting December 3, 2013 Agenda Item 1. C. Presentation of Envision Award - Curt and Jayne Olson family, Rob and Sue Wheaton family, Katie Murphy Design LLC, and Trees For Tyrol Donors Prepared By Cheryl Weiler, Communications Manager Summary When North Tyrol Park was devastated by a tornado in May 2011, it destroyed a park enjoyed by kids and families, including a lifetime of mature trees. The following year, Curt and Jayne Olson, Rob and Sue Wheaton, and Katie Murphy rallied the neighborhood to revitalize the park. They created a marketing plan and worked with the City to fund the purchase of larger trees and plantings so the park could regain its mature status years earlier. Using flyers, yard signs, a newsletter, and word of mouth, they built neighborhood awareness and support. Local action and neighborhood participation shows that North Tyrol Hills citizens recognize the value of their local park and invested so kids and families could enjoy the shade and facilities like generations before them. It is a prime example of a public/private joint venture that enhances the community social network and adds to the quality of life in Golden Valley. Recommended Action Award an Envision Award to the Curt and Jayne Olson family, the Rob and Sue Wheaton family, Katie Murphy Design LLC, and the Trees For Tyrol Donors for their long-term community vision and work in developing and implementing the Trees For Tyrol campaign. city am f , ,ik� Police Department 763-593-8079/763-593-8098(fax) � _._ _�_ � . ._ . � �. , _ �e���b� � -� � � : � Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Councit Meeting December 3, 2013 Agenda Item 1. D. Oath of Office - Police Officers Adam Olson and Dana Bokusky Prepared By Stacy Carlson, Chief of Police Summary Officer Adam Olson and Officer Dana Bokusky will be present to take the oath of office as a Golden Valley police officer. Recommended Action Mayor Harris administers the oath of office to Officer Adam Olson and Officer Dana Bokusky. 6�L�y V� .�iy � � Public Works Department 763-593-8030/763-593-3988(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting December 3, 2013 Agenda Item 1. E. Resolution of Appreciation for David Hanson Prepared By leannine Clancy, Director of Public Works Jeff Oliver, PE, City Engineer Summary The City of Golden Valley appointed David Hanson as its Alternate Commissioner to the Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission (BCWMC) in 1997. David served in this role until 2001, when he was appointed as the City's Commissioner. In 2001, David was again appointed the Alternate Commissioner and has served in that capacity until 2013. During his tenure, David was a strong advocate for improved water quality throughout the watershed, and was a champion for the water quality in Sweeney Lake, where he has lived for over 40 years. David's efforts included ensuring that erosion and sediment control, and water quality improvements were a foremost concern during the reconstruction of Trunk Highway 100 through Golden Valley. As a result, water quality ponds were constructed along the Highway 100 corridor, and a skimmer and other water quality improvements were completed within Schaper Pond to help provide preservation and improvement of the water quality in Sweeney Lake. David also played an active role in the development of the 2004 BCWMC Watershed Management Plan by serving on committees and dedicating numerous hours to the effort. In addition, David was actively involved in development of the Sweeney Lake TMD!Study, further advocating for additional capital improvements in Schaper Pond as part of the BCWMC Capital Improvement Plan.These improvements, which are scheduled for construction in 2014, are expected to be a major step towards Sweeney Lake meeting its water quality goals. David Hanson's dedication to improved water quality through his work on the BCWMC has left Sweeney Lake, the Bassett Creek Watershed and the region, a better piace. Attachments • Resolution of Appreciation for Services Provided by David Hanson to the City of Golden Valley and the Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission (1 page) Recommended Action Motion to adopt Resolution of Appreciation for Services Provided by David Hanson to the City of Golden Valley and the Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission. Resolution 13-103 December 3, 2013 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION FOR SERVICES PROVIDED BY DAVID HANSON TO THE CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY AND THE BASSETT CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT WHEREAS, the City of Golden Valley, Minnesota, wishes to acknowledge David Hanson's service as Commissioner and Alternate Commissioner representing the City of Golden Valley on the Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission from 1997 through 2013; and WHEREAS, David Hanson has generously given of his time and talents, without compensation, to serve the public and to protect the environment; and WHEREAS, his commitment to the water quality of Sweeney Lake, citizen education and citizen responsibility for lake concerns has been a priority; and WHEREAS, he advocated for modifications to Schaper Park Pond to improve its sediment and phosphorus removal capabilities, and urged the installation of the skimmer that is now located at the pond outlet into Sweeney Lake; and WHEREAS, David's efforts during the design and reconstruction of Highway 100 helped ensure that the project included water quality treatment to minimize the impact of the construction on stormwater runoff quality and providing protection to Sweeney Lake; and WHEREAS, David Hanson has been an advocate for the improved health of the waters of the Bassett Creek Watershed and has devoted many hours to implementing the goals and policies of the organization; and NOW, THEREF4RE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Golden Valley hereby expresses their sincere and grateful appreciation to David Hanson for his distinguished service to the public. Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: Susan M. Virnig, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by the City Clerk. ���y �� 'li ✓ ��„ � Park and Recreation Department � 763-512-2345!763-512-2344{fax} Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting December 3, 2013 Agenda Item 1. F. Receipt of Human Services Fund 2013 Allocation Report Prepared By Jeanne Fackler, Recreation Supervisor Summary The Human Services Fund (HSF) met on Monday, October 14 to review funding requests from eight agencies. The following requests were received and approved by the HSF for allocation at the November 11 meeting: A�ency Request Allocated Canvas Health/Crisis Connection $2,500 $2,000 Community Mediation $3,000 $2,500 Crisis Nursery $10,000 $3,000 Dinner At Your poor $8,000 $7,500 PRISM $10,000 $10,000 Senior Services HOME $5,000 $5,000 Senior Services Outreach $3,500 $3,500 The Bridge for Youth $5,000 $3,500 TreeHouse 5 000 3 S00 TOTAL $52,000 $40,500 Connie Sandler, Chair, will be at the meeting to review the Allocation Report and recap the 2013 activities. Recommended Action Motion to receive and file the 2014 Allocation Report and approve notifying the eight agencies of their 3014 allocation amount with the following designations: Canvas Health/Crisis Connection: Funds to be used to continue phone support. Community Mediation: Funds will be used for coordinating and supporting community volunteers. Crisis Nursery: Funds to be used to provide support and care to families in crisis. DinnerAt Your poor: Funds to be used to supplement clients unable to afford delivery and subsidize meals costs. PRISM: Funds to be used to provide emergency and support services for Golden Valley residents. Senior Community Services HOME: Funds to be used to fund the sliding fee scale to assist low- income Golden Valley seniors. Senior Community Services Outreach: Funds to be used for direct service. The Bridge for Youth: Funds to be used for "Project cab" to provide emergency transportation to youth in crisis. TreeHouse: Funds to be used to offset the cost of transporting teens to the TreeHouse facility in New Hope and St. louis Park. Regular Meeting of the City Council October 1, 2013 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Golden Valley, Hennepin County, Minnesota was held at 7800 Golden Valley Road in said City on October 1, 2013 at 6:30 pm. The following members were present: Clausen, Harris, Pentel, Scanlon and Schmidgall. Also present were: Thomas Burt, City Manager; Jeannine Clancy, Director of Public Works; Allen Barnard, City Attorney; and Judy Nally, Administrative Assistant. Pledqe of Alleqiance The Pledge of Allegiance was recited. Board/Commission Oath of Office and Presentation of Certificate of Appointment Mike Berger, Envision Connection Project Board of Directors, was unable to attend. Approval of Aqenda MOVED by Pentel, seconded by Scanlon and motion carried unanimously to approve the agenda of October 1, 2013 as amended: Addition of Email from Sheldon Olkon, Secretary- Treasurer, Laurel Hill West Condominiums Regarding PUD #113 - The Xenia, and Authorization for Submittal of Application for Hennepin Youth Sports Program Grants - Wildwood Park Play Structure. Approval of Consent Aqenda MOVED by Scanlon, seconded by Clausen and motion carried unanimously to approve the agenda of October 1, 2013 as amended: Addition of Email from Sheldon Olkon, Secretary- Treasurer, Laurel Hill West Condominiums Regarding PUD #113 - The Xenia. *Approval of Minutes - City Council Meetinq - July 16, 2013 MOVED by Scanlon, seconded by Clausen and motion carried unanimously to approve the City Council Meeting minutes of July 16, 2013 as submitted. *Approval of Check Reqister MOVED by Scanlon, seconded by Clausen and motion carried unanimously to authorize the payment of the City and Housing and Redevelopment Authority as submitted. *General Business License MOVED by Scanlon, seconded by Clausen and motion carried unanimously to authorize the issuance of license as recommended by staff. Regular Meeting of the City Council October 1, 2013 Page 2 '�Gamblinq License Application to Conduct Excluded Binqo - Ladies Auxiliarv of Golden Vallev Veterans of Foreiqn Wars Post#7051 MOVED by Scanlon, seconded by Clausen and motion carried unanimously to approve the gambling license application to conduct excluded bingo for the Ladies Auxiliary of Golden Valley Veterans of Foreign Wars Post #7051. *Minutes of Boards and Commissions MOVED by Scanlon, seconded by Clausen and motion carried unanimously to receive and file the minutes as follows: Planning Commission -August 12, 2013 *Commercial Compound Water Meters - Quotes MOVED by Scanlon, seconded by Clausen and motion carried unanimously to purchase twenty-five 3-inch and two 4-inch compound commercial meters from the lowest responsible bidder, DSG for $64,273. The quotes are as follows: DSG 3" meter $57,475 DSG 4" meter 6,798 $64,273 Midwest Meters 3" meter $63,750 Midwest Meters 4" meter No bid $63,750 *Call for Administrative Hearinq - Appeal of Administrative Citation - 2417 Parkview Boulevard - 10/8/13 MOVED by Scanlon, seconded by Clausen and motion carried unanimously to call for an administrative hearing on an appeal of an administrative citation of City Code Section 4.60: Residential Property Maintenance Code at 2417 Parkview Boulevard for October 8, 2013 at 5:30 pm. *Call for Administrative Hearinq -Appeal of Administrative Citation - 551 Ottawa Avenue South - 10/8/13 MOVED by Scanlon, seconded by Clausen and motion carried unanimously to call for an administrative hearing on an appeal of an administrative citation of City Code Section 4.60: Residential Property Maintenance Code at 551 Ottawa Avenue South for October 8, 2013 at 6 pm. Regular Meeting of the City Council October 1, 2013 Page 3 *Approvinq Appointment of Election Judqes for Citv Election Member Scanlon introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION 13-83 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE APPOINTMENT OF ELECTION JUDGES FOR THE CITY ELECTION TO BE HELD ON NOVEMBER 5, 2013 The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member Clausen and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Harris, Pentel, Scanlon and Schmidgall; and the following voted against the same: Clausen, whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by the City Clerk. *Receipt of Auqust 2013 Financial Reports MOVED by Scanlon, seconded by Clausen and motion carried unanimously to receive and file the August 2013 Financial Reports. *Call for Special Meetinq - Canvassinq Board and Council Member Oath of Office- 11/12/13 MOVED by Scanlon, seconded by Clausen and motion carried unanimously to call for a Special Meeting to canvass the November 5, 2013 election results and swear in the Council Member for the two year term on November 12, 2013 at 6:30 pm. *Waiver of Public Hearinq and Certification of Special Assessments: 2013 Eldridqe 3rd Addition - PUD #109 and 2013 Rhode Island Avenue North Member Scanlon introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION 13-84 RESOLUTION WAIVING THE PUBLIC HEARING PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA STATUTES 429.031 AND ORDERING CERTIFICATION OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS ON PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTION FOR ELDRIDGE 3RD ADDITION, P.U.D. 109 The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member Clausen and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Clausen, Harris, Pentel, Scanlon and Schmidgall; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by the City Clerk. Regular Meeting of the City Council October 1, 2013 Page 4 *Waiver of Public Hearinq and Certification of Special Assessments: 2013 Eldridge 3rd Addition - PUD #109 and 2013 Rhode Island Avenue North - Continued Member Scanlon introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION 13-85 RESOLUTION WAIVING THE PUBLIC HEARING PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA STATUTES 429.031 AND ORDERING CERTIFICATION OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS ON PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS FOR RHODE ISLAND AVENUE NORTH SANITARY SEWER The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member Clausen and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Glausen, Harris, Pentel, Scanlon and Schmidgall; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by the City Clerk. Authorization to Siqn Aqreements for with Bassett Creek Watershed Manaqement Commission and WSB & Associates, Inc. for Briarwood/Dawnview Water Quality Improvements ^ Council Member Clausen had questions about the location and notification process for the residents in the project area. Jeannine Clancy and Jeff Oliver, City Engineer, answered questions from the Council. MOVED by Clausen, seconded by Schmidgall and motion carried unanimously to authorize the City Manager to sign the Cooperative Agreement for the Briarwood/Dawnview Water Quality Project (BC-7) with the Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission and the City of Golden Valley. MOVED by Pentel, seconded by Scanlon and motion carried unanimously to authorize the City Manager to sign the agreement with WSB & Associates, Inc. for professional engineering services for an amount nat to exceed $21,000. Authorization to Submit Application for Hennepin Countv Sidewalk Grant Participation Proqram - Glenwood Avenue (TH 55 to Harold Avenue) Mayor Harris had questions regarding the location and property required for the sidewalks. Jeannine Clancy answered questions from the Council. Member Schmidgall introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION 13-86 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SUBMITTAL FOR THE HENNEPIN COUNTY SIDEWALK PARTICIPATION PROGRAM Regular Meeting of the City Council October 1, 2013 Page 5 Authorization to Submit Application for Hennepin Countv Sidewalk Grant Participation Proqram - Glenwood Avenue (TH 55 to Harold Avenue) - Continued The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member Scanlon and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Clausen, Harris, Pentel, Scanlon and Schmidgall; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by the City Clerk. *Proclamation for 60th Anniversary of General Mills Foundation MOVED by Scanlon, seconded by Clausen and motion carried unanimously to proclaim October 15, 2013 as General Mills Foundation day. *Email from Sheldon Olkon, Secretarv-Treasurer, Laurel Hill West Condominiums Reqardinq PUD #113 - The Xenia. MOVED by Scanlon, seconded by Clausen and motion carried unanimously to receive and file the letter from Sheldon Olkon, Laurel Hills West Condominiums, dated September 30, 2013 regarding PUD #113, The Xenia. Public Hearinq - Preliminarv Desiqn Plan Approval - PUD #113 - The Xenia - Slosburq Companv, Applicant Mark Grimes, Community Development Director, introduced the agenda item and answered questions from the Council. Jeff Oliver, City Engineer, Jeannine Clancy, Mike Kotila, Traffic Engineer Consultant, SEH Inc.; and Tom Burt answered questions from the Council. Richard Slosburg, Jerry Kavan, Slosburg Company, Applicant, and Jeff Shopek, Loucks Associates, reviewed the plan and answered questions from the Council. The Mayor opened the meeting for public input and persons present to do so were afforded the opportunity to express their views thereon. Marilynn Condon, 5901 Laurel Avenue, stated she is not opposed to the development and thinks it is wonderful but expressed concern about the traffic exiting onto Laurel, feels Laurel is already a raceway, has difficulty pulling out from her condo especially during rush hour; would like to see the proposed development have an exit on Golden Hills Drive instead of Laurel, when existing the proposed development you end up on the railroad tracks; she stated that there has been an increase in railroad traffic and the tracks are busy six days a week from morning to midnight; and there is a lot of trains being loaded and unloaded at night; and requested the Council reconsider allowing the proposed development to exit onto Laurel Avenue. Regular Meeting of the City Council October 1, 2013 Page 6 Public Hearinq - Preliminarv Desiqn Plan Approval - PUD #113 - The Xenia - Slosburq Companv, Applicant - Continued The Mayor closed the public hearing. MOVED by Schmidgall, seconded by Clausen and motion carried unanimously to approve the Preliminary Plan for The Xenia, PUD No. 113, subject to the following conditions: 1. The plans submitted with the application shall become a part of this approval. 2. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from Deputy Fire Chief John Crelly to Mark Grimes, Director of Community Development dated August 20, 2013, shall become part of this approval. 3. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from City Engineer Jeff Oliver to Mark Grimes, Director of Community Development, dated September 5, 2013, shall become a part of this approval. 4. The City Attorney shall determine if a park dedication fee is required for this project prior to Final PUD approval. 5. All signs on the property shall meet the requirements of the City's Sign Code. 6. This approval is subject to all other state, federal, and local ordinances, regulations, or laws with authority over this development. In addition the Council makes the following findings pursuant to City Code Section 11.55, Subd. 5(E): 1. The PUD plan is tailored to the specific characteristics of the site and achieves a higher quality of site planning and design than generally expected under conventional provisions of the ordinance. 2. The PUD plan preserves and protects substantial desirable portions of the site's characteristics, open space and sensitive environmental features including steep slopes, trees, scenic views, creeks, wetlands and open waters. 3. The PUD plan includes efficient and effective use (which includes preservation) of the land. 4. The PUD Plan results in development compatible with adjacent uses and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and redevelopment plans and goals. 5. The PUD plan is consistent with preserving and improving the general health, safety and general welfare of the people of the City. 6. The PUD plan meets the PUD Intent and Purpose provision and all other PUD ordinance provisions. Public Hearinq - Rezoninq from Institutional Zoninq District (I-1) with Restrictive Condition to Institutional Zoninq District (I-1) without Condition - 6000 Duluth Street - Kinq of Grace Lutheran Church and School, Applicant Mayor Harris stated that the applicant withdrew the request to rezone 6000 Duluth Street and no action is necessary. Regular Meeting of the City Council October 1, 2013 Page 7 Public Hearinq - Special Assessments - Delinquent Utilitv Bills Sue Virnig, Finance Director, introduced the agenda item and answered questions from the Council. The Mayor opened the meeting for public input and persons present to do so were afforded the opportunity to express their views thereon. Hearing and seeing no one, the Mayor closed the public hearing. Member Clausen introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION 13-87 RESOLUTION ADOPTING AND CONFIRMING ASSESSMENTS FOR DELINQUENT UTILITY BILLING The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member Scanlon and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Clausen, Harris, Pentel, Scanlon and Schmidgall; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by the City Clerk. Public Hearinq - Special Assessments - Miscellaneous Charges Sue Virnig, Finance Director, introduced the agenda item and answered questions from the Council. The Mayor opened the meeting for public input and persons present to do so were afforded the opportunity to express their views thereon. Hearing and seeing no one, the Mayor closed the public hearing. Member Pentel introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION 13-88 RESOLUTION ADOPTING AND CONFIRMING ASSESSMENTS FOR MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES (WEEDS, FALSE ALARMS, ADMINISTRATIVE CITATIONS, ETC) The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member Scanlon and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Clausen, Harris, Pentel, Scanlon and Schmidgall; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by the City Clerk. Regular Meeting of the City Councii October 1, 2013 Page 8 Announcements of Meetinqs Some Council Members may attend the Arc Event on October 3, 2013 at 6:30 pm at Deb and Tim Reisner home at 1560 Oregon Avenue North. A Special City Council Meeting will be held to conduct an Administrative Hearing for 2417 Parkview Boulevard on October 8, 2013 at 5:30 pm. A Special City Council Meeting will be he{d to conduct an Administrative Hearing for 551 Ottawa Avenue South on October 8, 2013 at 6 pm. The next Housing and Redevelopment Authority meeting will be held on October 8, 2013 at 6:30 pm. The next CouncillManager meeting will be held on October 8, 2013 immediately following the HRA meeting. The Golden Valley League of Women Voters will hold a candidate night on October 9, 2013 from 7 to 9 pm. Some Council Members may attend the Golden Valley Historical Society Meeting on October 10, 2013 at 7 pm at the Golden Valley Historical Society. Some Council Members may attend Kelly Drive Pumpkin Fest on October 12, 2013 from 11 am to 1 pm. The next City Council meeting will be held on October 15, 2013 at 6:30 pm. A Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission meeting will be held on October 17, 2013 at 8:30 am. The last day for the Market in the Valley will be October 6, 2013. Mavor and Council Communications Mayor Harris reviewed the Douglas Drive neighborhood meeting and stated he contacted the Robbinsdale School District regarding possible programs for apartment residents. PRISM will hold an open house on October 8, 2013 from 5 to 7 pm. Mayor Harris stated that staff has prepared a letter to be distributed to the Triton Neighborhood regarding the status of the development. Regular Meeting of the City Council October 1, 2013 Page 9 Authorization to Siqn Amended PUD Permit -Allianz - PUD #87 -Amendment#4 Mark Grimes, Community Development Director, introduced the agenda item and answered questions from the Council. MOVED by Schmidgall, seconded by Clausen and motion carried unanimously to authorize the Mayor and City Manager to sign the amended PUD Permit for Allianz PUD 87, Amendment #4 to allow for a small building addition that would add locker room space to the company's fitness center. Authorization for Submittal of Application for Hennepin Youth Sports Program Grants -Wildwood Park Plav Structure Tom Burt introduced the agenda item and answered questions from the Council. Member Pentel introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION 13-89 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SUBMITTAL OF APPLICATION FOR HENNEPIN YOUTH SPORTS PROGRAM GRANT The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member Scanlon and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Clausen, Harris, Pente{, Scanlon and Schmidgall; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by the City Clerk. Adiournment MOVED by Schmidgall, seconded by Clausen and motion carried unanimously to adjourn the meeting at 8:35 pm. Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: Judy Nally, Administrative Assistant ���� �� M1:�+� tA ''F� Finance Department 763-593-8013/763-593-8103(fax) � � , � � ,,.� . _ �- m. '���� � ` m - . � _, _ . Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting December 3, 2013 Agenda Item 3. B. Approval of City Check Register Prepared By Sue Virnig, Finance Director Summary Approval of the check register for various vendor claims against the City of Golden Valley. Attachments • Document sent via email Recommended Action Motion to authorize the payment of the bills as submitted. Regular Meeting of the Golden Valley Planning Commission October 14, 2013 A regular meeting of the Planning Commission was held at the Golden Valley City Hall, Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota, on Monday, October 14, 2013. Chair Kluchka called the meeting to order at 7 pm. Those present were Planning Commissioners Baker, Boudreau-Landis, Cera, Kluchka, McCarty, Segelbaum and Waldhauser. Also present was Community Development Director Mark Grimes, City Planner Joe Hogeboom, Finance Director Sue Virnig, Public Works Specialist Eric Eckman and Administrative Assistant Lisa Wittman. 1. Approval of Minutes September 9, 2013 Regular Planning Commission Meeting McCarty noted several typographical errors. MOVED by Segelbaum, seconded by Waldhauser and motion carried unanimously to approve the September 9, 2013 minutes with the corrections McCarty pointed out. 2. Presentation of Capital Improvement Program 2014-2018 — Sue Virnig;City Finance Director Sue Virnig, Finance Director, explained that the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is a 5-year financing planning instrument used to identify needed capital projects and to delineate the financing and timing of associated projects. Because of its relationship with the City's Comprehensive Plan the CIP is reviewed by the Planning Commission annually. Segelbaum referred to page five of the Financing section and noted there was a comment regarding Tax Increment Bonds for the Golden Hills district and asked for a status on the TIF District. Virnig stated that the Golden Hills district started in 1984 and was extended by special legislation to 2015 in order to pay off debt. Segelbaum questioned if this is a separate issue from the Xenia development and other developments in that area. Virnig stated that was correct and noted that the Xenia development is in a TIF district but they did not require tax increment help. Waldhauser said she noticed some significant investments in street upgrades and repairs for some areas targeted for future development. She asked if there are any upgrades proposed for the I-394 corridor area. Virnig stated that the residential streets behind the proposed 3.9.4 development were recently upgraded and noted that there are 12 miles of streets left to complete in the entire city. Waldhauser questioned if there will be any upgrades in the area around Xenia and Laurel. Virnig stated that the Metropolitan Council did some sewer lining in that area and some traffic upgrades are being considered along Xenia and Golden Hills. Segelbaum referred to the Building section and noted that there is $100,000 budgeted for a community center needs assessment. He asked if that means the City is in the Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission October 14, 2013 Page 2 early stages of improving Brookview Community Center. Virnig said yes, there will be a needs study conducted. MOVED by McCarty, seconded by Cera and motion carried unanimously to recommend approval of the 2014-2018 Capital Improvement Program as it is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. Informal Public Hearing — Conditional Use Permit (CUP) — 1400 Spring Valley Road — Boathouse — CU-135 Applicant: Scott Eastman Address: 1400 Spring Valley Road Purpose: To allow for a boathouse in the R-1 Residential Zoning District. Hogeboom explained the applicant's request to build a boathouse on Sweeney Lake. He explained that Conditional Use Permits are typically used in the Commercial and Industriai zoning districts, however, boathouses in the R-1 Residential zoning district require a Conditional Use Permit as outlined in Section 11.65 Shoreland Management Section of the Zoning Code. He referred to the applicant's proposal and stated that he would like to build a new 120 square foot boathouse which will replace an existing 48 square foot shed/boathouse. He stated that staff is recommending approval of the proposal and added that the Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission and the DNR has reviewed the proposal and has no objection. Kluchka asked what options the applicant would have without a Conditional Use Permit. Hogeboom stated that the only thing the applicant could do without a Conditional Use Permit is replace the existing structure with one the same size, in the same location or build a new boathouse 75 feet away from the Ordinary High Water Mark of Sweeney Lake. In this case, the structure will be larger, in a different location and closer to the Ordinary High Water mark than 75 feet. Baker asked Hogeboom if the DNR had no objection or no comment to the proposed boathouse. Hogeboom explained that affected agencies are sent planning proposals and that the DNR hasn't commented on this proposal. Kluchka asked if motorized watercrafts are allowed on Sweeney Lake. Hogeboom said yes, however only non-motorized watercrafts can use the public boat launch. Kluchka asked if this Conditional Use Permit would allow only a 10 ft. x 12 ft. structure. Hogeboom said yes and stated that if the applicant wanted to build something different he would have to apply for a Conditional Use Permit amendment. Segelbaum asked about the height of the proposed structure. Hogeboom stated that the Zoning Code allows all accessory structures to be 10 feet high from the floor to the top Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission October 14, 2013 Page 3 plate of the structure. Segelbaum asked if that should be specified in the Conditional Use Permit. McCarty asked if there are design requirements. Hogeboom said no. Baker asked if the proposed boathouse will require a change to the shoreline vegetation. Hogeboom said he didn't think so, but suggested the applicant answer that question. Scott Eastman, Applicant, explained that he is also doing a landscaping project that has received Bassett Creek Watershed Commission approval. He added that his intent is to plant prairie grasses that will help with filtration. Baker asked if there is vegetation in the water. Eastman said it won't be disturbed. Cera referred to the site plan and asked the applicant about the deck that is being replaced. Eastman stated that there is a wood deck currently located on the property that he is proposing to replace with pavers. He added the deck proposal was included in the landscaping plan approved by the Bassett Creek Watershed Commission. Kluchka opened the public hearing. Seeing and hearing no one wishing to speak Kluchka closed the public hearing. Segelbaum suggested adding a condition to their recommendation stating that the applicant will have to abide by all other accessory structure requirements. Kluchka questioned if that is necessary or if accessory structure requirements would have to be met regardless. Hogeboom stated that staff didn't feel additional language was necessary because the applicant will have to follow all of the Zoning Code requirements. Grimes said he didn't think there would be any harm in saying that the boathouse shall be considered an accessory structure. MOVED by Baker, seconded by Cera and motion carried unanimously to recommend approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow for the construction of a boathouse subject to the following conditions and findings: Conditions: 1. The site plan shall become a part of this approval. 2. The boathouse shall be used solely for the storage of boats and boating equipment. 3. All future improvements to the building shall meet the City's Building Code requirements. 4. The boathouse shall be considered an accessory structure under the City's Zoning Code. 5. All other applicable local, state and federal requirements shall be met at all times. Failure to comply with any of the terms of this permit shaN be grounds for revocation. Findinqs: 1. Demonstrated Need of the Use: The City requires that an applicant identify a market for the proposed good or service necessitating a CUP. In this case, the applicant has Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission October 14, 2013 Page 4 demonstrated that his existing boathouse is inadequate in size to store marine equipment. 2. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan: The General Land Use Plan Map guides this site for low density residential use. A boathouse is complementary to the residential nature of this property. 3. Effect on Property Values in the Area: The proposed new boathouse is part of a larger landscaping plan for the property. The work that is being conducted should enhance the appearance of the property. 4. Effect on Traffic in the Area: The proposed boathouse will cause no increase in traffic. 5. Effect of Increases in Density or Population on the Area: The proposed boathouse will have no effect on population. 6. Increase in Noise Created by Use: Aside from noise associated with construction, the proposed boathouse will not generate noise. 7. Any Dust, Odor or Vibration caused by Use: These issues will not be a problem at this location. 8. Any Increase in Animal Pests Caused by the Use: The proposed boathouse will not attract animal pests of any kind. 9. Visual Appearance of the Use: The proposed boathouse is part of a larger landscaping and property renovation project. It should enhance the visual appearance of the site. 10.Other Effects of the Use: Staff does not anticipate any negative effects of the proposed use. 4. Informal Public Hearing — Conditional Use Permit (CUP) — 9400 Golden Valley Road — Daycare Expansion — CU-121, Amendment#2 Applicant: Orion Associates Address: 9400 Golden Valley Road Purpose: To allow the applicant's existing daycare center to offer daycare to the general public, as well as their employees in the Business and Professional Offices Zoning District. Hogeboom explained the applicant's request to amend their existing Conditional Use Permit. He stated that the applicant's original Conditiona! Use Permit allowed daycare for up to 10 children for their employees only. In 2010 an amendment was approved to allow daycare for up to 28 children for their employees. This current request is to allow them to offer daycare to people not employed there. He noted that the drop-off and pick-up time for the daycare are different from the regular business hours so there shouldn't be traffic or parking issues and that staff is recommending approval of this request. Waldhauser questioned why there is a restriction on outdoor signage promoting the daycare in the existing Conditional Use Permit. Hogeboom stated that that restriction was placed in the original Conditional Use Permit because the daycare is only allowed to serve employees, not the general public. Grimes added that the applicant is allowed a certain amount of signage per the City's Sign Code. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission October 14, 2013 Page 5 Cera referred to the Deputy Fire Chief's memo and questioned why it refers to the number of children as going from 10 children to 15 children. Hogeboom stated that the Deputy Fire Chief used those numbers because the applicant's daycare license allows them to provide care for 15 children even though their Conditional Use Permit allows 28 children. Kluchka asked that the Deputy Fire Chief's memo be updated. Baker asked about the daycare's enrollment numbers. Angela Cavalier, representing the applicant, explained that their daycare license issued by the State allows them to provide care for 15 children. She stated that they currently have 12 children which is why they are hoping to be able to open up their enrollment to the public. Gera asked if they would increase their enrollment beyond 15 children. Cavalier said no and explained that they don't have enough square footage for more than 15 children. McCarty asked why it has been a challenge to provide daycare to employees only. Cavalier stated that the utilization of the daycare changes. She explained that they have had 15 children in the past but that they need to have more children to make it cash neutraL McCarty asked about precedence and questioned how an employee would be able to put a child in the daycare if a non-employee already has the spot. Cavalier stated that in that case the employee's child would have to wait for an opening. McCarty asked Cavalier how they will advertise for the daycare. Cavalier said they would start by approaching their neighboring businesses. Kluchka opened the public hearing. Seeing and hearing no one wishing to speak, Kluchka closed the public hearing. Segelbaum stated that he is supportive of this proposal since the applicant is nowhere near their maximum allowed number of 28 children. Cera questioned if the maximum number of 28 children should be changed. The Commissioners didn't think the Conditional Use Permit needs to change because their license from the State will determine how many children they can have in their daycare. MOVED by Waldhauser, seconded by McCarty and motion carried unanimously to recommend approval of amending CUP #121 to allow the applicant's existing daycare center to offer daycare to the general public, as well as their employees subject to the following conditions and findings: Conditions: 1. All existing conditions (except condition #2) continue to be met. 2. All necessary licenses must be obtained by the Minnesota Department of Health and the Minnesota Department of Human Services. 3. A Minnesota registered architect must establish a fire code analysis to assign an 'educational occupant' designation to the area of the building used for the daycare facility. The code analysis must be reviewed by the Building Official and the Fire Marshal to ensure proper building and fire code requirements. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission October 14, 2013 Page 6 4. All other applicable local, state and federal requirements shall be met at all times. Findinqs: 1. Demonstrated Need of the Use: The City requires that an applicant identify a market for the proposed good or service necessitating a CUP. In this case, the applicant believes that there is a market for daycare services in this area. 2. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan: The General Land Use Plan Map guides this site for office uses. Childcare facilities are allowed in office areas with a Conditional Use Permit. 3. Effect on Property Values in the Area: The daycare service is already in place, and so this amendment should have no effect on property values in the area. 4. Effect on Traffic in the Area: To alleviate traffic and parking generated at this site, RHT Office has opened a second office facility in Hopkins. This has reduced some traffic and on-street parking at this site. In addition, the hours of operation for the daycare are different from the normal client hours at the site. Therefore staff does not believe that this request will affect traffic in the area. 5. Effect of Increases in Density or Population on the Area: The proposed use will have no effect on population. 6. Increase in Noise Created by Use: The proposed use will not result in increased noise. 7. Any Dust, Odor or Vibration caused by Use: The proposed use will not result in any dust, odor or vibration. 8. Any Increase in Animal Pests Caused by the Use: The proposed use will not attract animal pests of any kind. 9. Visual Appearance of the Use: The proposed amendment will have no impact of the visual appearance on the site. 10.Other Effects of the Use: Staff does not anticipate any negative effects of the proposed use. 5. Informal Public Hearing — Final Plan Review— Planned Unit Development (PUD) — Meadowbrook School PUD #90, Amendment#3 Applicant: Hopkins Public Schools Address: 5430 Glenwood Avenue Purpose: To construct an interconnection addition between the existing facility and the adjacent facility located at 5400 Glenwood Avenue. Hogeboom stated that this proposal is the Final Plan review phase of the applicant's PUD amendment proposal. He explained that the proposed PUD amendment would allow for the construction of a small addition, the incorporation of the current Crisis Nursery Facility into the main school facility and a tunnel connection between the two buildings. He stated that staff is recommending approval of the Final PUD plan and added that the City's consulting traffic engineer has also been working with the applicant to implement some traffic improvements on their site. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission October 14, 2013 Page 7 Segelbaum asked if the traffic plan will be adopted by the City Council. Kluchka asked if the Planning Commission will have an opportunity to review the traffic plan. Grimes stated that the plan will be reviewed by the City Council as part of their review and that traffic will also continue to be monitored by staff. Dan Bosch, ESG, representing the applicant, referred to the site plans and explained where the small classroom addition and tunnel will be located. He also explained the stormwater changes on the site and how the traffic flow will work on the school and the crisis nursery parking lots. Waldhauser asked if the kids will have to go through the tunnel to access the playground. Patrick Poquette, Hopkins Schools, Applicant, explained that the third graders will use the tunnel to access the playground but the early childcare kids will use the crisis nursery play area. Kluchka asked about the applicant's snow storage plan. Bosch referred to the site plan and showed where snow will be stored. Segelbaum stated that parents are already using the Crisis Nursery parking lot and questioned if there will be a path from that lot to the school entrance. Poquette explained that the people who use the Crisis Nursery parking lot will be dropping off their children at that site and that others will use the school parking lot. He also stated that there is a 10-foot grade difference so they are not proposing to build a path or sidewalk in that location. He added that they would like to have their new plan for parking in place on November 1. Kluchka opened the public hearing. Seeing and hearing no one wishing to comment, Kluchka closed the public hearing. MOVED by McCarty, seconded by Segelbaum and motion carried unanimously to recommend approval of the Final Plan for Meadowbrook Elementary School PUD #90, Amendment 3, subject to the following conditions and findings: Conditions: 1. The plans prepared by SGN/Wendel, dated August 28, 2013, submitted with the application shall become a part of this approval. 2. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from Deputy Fire Chief John Crelly to Mark Grimes, Community Development Director dated August 5, 2013, shall become part of this approval. 3. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from City Engineer Jeff Oliver to Mark Grimes, Community Development Director, dated October 10, 2013, shall become a part of this approvaL 4. All signs on the property shall meet the requirements of the City's Sign Code. 5. This approval is subject to all other state, federal, and local ordinances, regulations, or laws with authority over this development. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission October 14, 2013 Page 8 Findinqs: 1. Quality Site Planning. The PUD plan is tailored to the specific characteristics of the site and achieves a higher quality of site planning and design than generally expected under conventional provisions of the ordinance. Z. Preservation. The PUD plan preserves and protects substantial desirable portions of the site's characteristics, open space and sensitive environmental features including steep slopes, trees, scenic views, creeks, wetlands and open waters. 3. Efficient— Effective. The PUD plan includes efficient and effective use (which includes preservation) of the land. 4. Compatibility. The PUD Plan results in development compatible with adjacent uses and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and redevelopment plans and goals. 5. General Health. The PUD plan is consistent with preserving and improving the general health, safety and general welfare of the people of the City. 6. Meets Requirements. The PUD plan meets the PUD Intent and Purpose provision and all other PUD ordinance provisions. 6. Informal Public Hearing — Property Rezoning — 5400 Glenwood Avenue — Meadowbrook School —Z008-03 Applicant: Hopkins Public Schools Address: 5400 Glenwood Avenue Purpose: To accommodate the construct an interconnection addition between the existing facility and the adjacent facility located at 5430 Glenwood Avenue as part of Amendment #3 to PUD #90. Hogeboom explained that the rezoning of the Crisis Nursery property at 5400 Glenwood Avenue from Institutional I-3 (rest homes, sanitariums, nursing homes, clinics) to Institutional I-1 (churches and schools) is a necessity for the property to be incorporated into the Meadowbrook School PUD. Kluchka opened the public hearing. Seeing and hearing no one wishing to comment, Kluchka closed the public hearing. MOVED by Cera, seconded by Boudreau-Landis and motion carried unanimously to recommend approval of rezoning the property at 5400 Glenwood Avenue from Institutional I-3 to Institutional I-1. 7. Informal Public Hearing — Final Plan Review— Planned Unit Development (PUD) — Room and Board PUD #79, Amendment#4 Applicant: Room and Board Address: 4600 Olson Memorial Highway Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission October 14, 2013 Page 9 Purpose: To relocate their outlet sales into the existing warehouse, demolish the existing outlet building for the construction of parking and construct a second floor in the existing warehouse to be used as office space. Hogeboom stated that this proposal is the Final Plan review phase of the applicant's PUD amendment proposal. He explained that the proposed PUD amendment would allow the applicant to relocate their outlet sales into the existing warehouse, demolish the existing outlet building for the construction of parking and construct a second floor in the existing warehouse to be used as office space. He added that the City Council approved the Preliminary PUD plan at their September 3 meeting. At that meeting a neighboring property owner expressed concern about traffic. Segelbaum asked if the neighbor's concern was weekday or weekend traffic. Hogeboom said the concern was the traffic with outlet sales on weekends. Segelbaum questioned why the traffic study was conducted on a Wednesday. Grimes stated that there were a number of concerns and that the neighbor's concerns were mostly regarding weekday traffic. He said he feels the issues were addressed in the traffic study report. Kluchka asked if the concerns have been alleviated. Waldhauser stated that the concerns were the infrequency of the traffic light changes on Highway 55. Daryl Fortier, Fortier Architects, representing the Applicant, explained the changes in the plans since the preliminary plan review. He stated that the biggest change has been that they are not going to proceed with the additional parking spaces on the northeast corner, which adjusts the tress preservation plan allowing them to keep more trees and decrease the density of the project. Baker asked if the proposed changes will affect snow storage. Fortier said no. Kluchka opened the public hearing. Stuart Rubin, States Manufacturing, said he was the neighbor who spoke at the City Council meeting. He stated that one of his concerns is traffic and the other is the water run-off. He said he hasn't heard anything to alleviate his concerns. He said Room & Board is adding 168 employees and that his employees are already backed up at the stop lights now. He said they've had issues will run-off and now there will be a loss of 6,000 square feet of pervious surface which isn't going to improve the run-off situation. He said he would like assurances that this project isn't going to make anything worse and if it does he wants to know what he can do. Waldhauser suggested that Mr. Rubin read the traffic report and the City Engineer's staff report. Rubin said he wants it on record that he has concerns about the traffic and run-off issues. Waldhauser noted that Room & Board offered to do a joint analysis of the run-off concerns. Rubin said he doesn't want to pay for a study for something Room & Board is doing. Kluchka asked Grimes for a better summary of the traffic and run-off issues. Grimes referred to the City Engineer's memo where it talks about steps the City will take to Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission October 14, 2013 Page 10 address the run-off issues and in terms of traffic, it appears there are some issues but adding more traffic controls is not the solution. He stated that the City will continue to monitor the situation. Kluchka questioned if the streets are operating at a sufficient level and that adding to the traffic won't ruin the capacity. Grimes said that is correct. Eric Eckman, Public Works Specialist, explained that Room & Board did some improvements in 1999 and States Manufacturing has said that those improvements caused water run-off issues. He said the City understands that the issue was addressed by Room & Board approximately 10 years ago with an earthen berm and a retaining wall adjacent to States Manufacturing that seems to be working. He said that States Manufacturing still has concerns about drainage and that Room & Board has offered to do a number of things including excavating and maintenance of the existing stormwater pond. Waldhauser asked if stormwater pond maintenance is an ongoing thing. Eckman said yes. Boudreau-Landis asked if there is a recommended interval for maintenance. Eckman said they should be inspected annually. Waldhauser asked if this proposal is an opportunity to get a maintenance agreement from the applicant. Eckman said yes and explained that the staff report from the City Engineer becomes a part of the PUD Permit. Baker asked if the items being discussed will address the neighbor's concerns. Eckman said the items addressed should help with the neighbor's concerns but the drainage issues can't be completely predicted. He added that it is positive that the proposed addition isn't adjacent to the slope so there will be no additional volume flowing toward the north. Baker asked if there is a threshold that triggers the dredging of a pond. Eckman said yes. Kluchka questioned the best way for the neighbor to understand. Eckman said staff knows that States Manufacturing has some legitimate concerns and suggested they contact staff for technical support and advice. Segelbaum asked if the City will monitor the parking situation. Grimes said yes and added that Room & Board has done a good job managing their parking demand. MOVED by Waldhauser, seconded by Segelbaum and motion carried unanimously to recommend approval of the Final Plan for Room & Board PUD #79, Amendment 4, subject to the following conditions and findings: Conditions: 1. The plans submitted with the application, dated September 13, 2013, shall become a part of this approval. 2. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from Deputy Fire Chief John Crelly to Mark Grimes, Community Development Director dated July 26, 2013, shall become part of this approval. 3. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from City Engineer Jeff Oliver to Mark Grimes, Community Development Director dated October 10, 2013, shall become part of this approval. 4. All signs on the property must meet the requirements of the City's Sign Code. 5. This approval is subject to all other state, federal, and local ordinances, regulations, or laws with authority over this development. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission October 14, 2013 Page 11 Findinqs: 1. Quality Site Planning. The PUD plan is tailored to the specific characteristics of the site and achieves a higher quality of site planning and design than generally expected under conventional provisions of the ordinance. 2. Preservation. The PUD plan preserves and protects substantial desirable portions of the site's characteristics, open space and sensitive environmental features including steep slopes, trees, scenic views, creeks, wetlands and open waters. 3. Efficient— Effective. The PUD plan includes efficient and effective use (which includes preservation) of the land. 4. Compatibility. The PUD Plan results in development compatible with adjacent uses and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and redevelopment plans and goals. 5. General Health. The PUD plan is consistent with preserving and improving the general health, safety and general welfare of the people of the City. 6. Meets Requirements. The PUD plan meets the PUD Intent and Purpose provision and all other PUD ordinance provisions. 8. Informal Public Hearing — Preliminary Plan Review — Planned Unit Development (PUD) — Tennant Company PUD #114 Applicant: Tennant Company Address: 701 Lilac Drive North Purpose: To allow the applicant to consolidate its multiple properties into one parcel to enable inter-campus connections. Commissioner Segelbaum recused himself. Hogeboom referred to a site plan and noted that Tennant Company located at the northwest corner of the Highway 100/Highway 55 intersection is requesting a PUD to allow the consolidation of multiple properties into one parcel to enable inter-campus connections. He stated that Tennant Company manufactures indoor and outdoor environmental cleaning solutions and specialty floor coatings and that Golden Valley is considered their North American headquarters. He explained that Tennant Company has acquired several adjacent properties and has hired a planning consultant to create a master plan for its facility, entitled "One Campus." The first phase of the One Campus plans seeks to create pedestrian and roadway connections within the site. Driveways and sidewalks cannot cross property lines unless the property is part of a PUD. He stated that Tennant Company has no immediate plans to construct new buildings or demolish existing buildings and that any future site work will require an amendment to the PUD. Kluchka stated that one of the requirements in the PUD ordinance language refers to quality site planning and asked how quality site planning is defined. Hogeboom stated that this situation is unique because the applicant is not starting with a blank slate. They are taking existing conditions and trying to fit them into the City's requirements. He stated that Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission October 14, 2013 Page 12 quality site planning considers how the roads work, the building materials used, how the use interacts with neighboring uses, etc. Grimes added that water quality is another issue considered and in this case the applicant also needs to have safe access for their employees. Waldhauser said it seems like there will be some long term improvements the City might not get without a PUD. Cera stated that in the applicant's submittal there was talk about new buildings on properties they don't own. Hogeboom clarified that the applicant is trying to give a big picture look and what they might consider doing in the future. He stated that only the properties they currently own are a part of this PUD proposal. Kluchka said he would like to add a condition to their recommendation to require a materials review. Michael Schroeder, LHB, representing the applicant, stated that this is a unique situation that they are trying to look at long-term to determine how they can accommodate their needs and how they can integrate their existing properties into one site. He stated that Tennant is committed to accommodating this site in Golden Valley and they have worked with staff on their stormwater management plans and that their plan is to make incremental changes and improvements starting with sidewalk connections. He reiterated that this PUD plan proposal only includes the land Tennant currently owns. Kluchka asked if there are plans for Tennant to acquire other properties. Schroeder stated that Tennant is in no particular hurry to acquire other properties. Larry Spears, Tennant Company, stated that they have the property they need to accommodate their future plans without acquiring other properties. Kluchka asked if there have been any conversations with the neighbors about involving them in the planning process. Spears stated that they have not had conversations with the neighboring property owners, other than the City's public hearings, because they don't want to confuse anyone by having them think that Tennant may be interested in acquiring their property because they are not. Kluchka opened the public hearing. Don Edson, 5804 Olson Memorial Highway, said they've been in this situation before with Tennant and that they don't need to put in a sidewalk. He said he hopes they are not planning on putting a driveway in because they are an island and it causes problems. Me said they discovered that there are Comcast lines in is backyard but he cannot get service from the lines and that he has casually mentioned the price he would sell his property for to Tennant but he hasn't hearing anything from them. He said he would like to be more in the (oop and asked why his property was listed on the hearing notice he received but the Damascus Way property wasn't included. Seeing and hearing no one else wishing to comment, Kluchka closed the public hearing. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission October 14, 2013 Page 13 Hogeboom stated that some addresses were inadvertently put on the hearing notice and that the map shown on the hearing notice was meant to be illustrative however, it was confusing and will be corrected moving forward. Kluchka asked the applicant to address the Damascus Way property question. Spears reiterated that Tennant is not interested in purchasing the Damascus Way property or any other properties. Schroeder referred to a map and clarified exactly which properties Tennant owns. Kluchka asked about the current traffic patterns and what Tennant envisions in the future. Schroeder referred to a traffic study done in 2009 and noted that this proposal is a much lesser proposal than was discussed in 2009. He stated that the traffic study may have to be updated in the future but that this proposal will have no major impact on traffic. Cera asked when the "farm house" property was purchased by Tennant. Spears said he thought it was purchased in 2006 or before. Cera asked if anyone has ever approached Tennant about purchasing their property. Spears said no, but that he would speak with Mr. Edson. Kluchka asked if the applicant's plans include updating or maintaining the fencing along the north side of their property. Spears said yes. Kluchka asked if any trail connections are planned. Spears said no and added that he has spoken with Three Rivers Park District but that they are not looking for any connections from Tennant. Waldhauser said she doesn't see any reason not to approve this proposal. Kluchka said he has concerns about this proposal being such a broad vision without considering the rest of the properties around them. He said if the plans were just about sidewalk connections, he'd feel more comfortable. Cera said he has the same concerns and that this proposal seems very preliminary. He said he is also bothered by the properties that are left being an island and that certain services can't be obtained by those homeowners. Grimes said he thinks this proposal is a good way for the City to start discussions on how there can be better water quality and how the Fire Department's issues can be addressed. He stated that Tennant is a great corporate partner and that they have been working with staff to make improvements. McCarty stated that recommending approval of this proposal won't preclude them from future review and that this proposal is a good way to get the process started. Waldhauser agreed that she feels comfortable recommending approval. Grimes added that Tennant would have to go through the PUD amendment process for any changes they'd want to make in the future. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission October 14, 2013 Page 14 Kluchka said he would like to add a condition stating that all final site plans and building plans are subject to final design review. He questioned if the fence issue and landscaping issues should be considered now. Grimes stated that as part of the Final PUD plan review process there are going to be many requirements Tennant will have to meet. MOVED by Cera, seconded by Baker and motion carried unanimously to recommend approval of the Preliminary Plan for Tennant Company PUD #114 subject to the following conditions and findings: Conditions: 1. The plans submitted September 13, 2013 shall become a part of the approval. 2. The Memo from Deputy Fire Chief John Crelly to Mark Grimes, Director of Community Development dated October 4, 2013 shall become a part of the approval. 3. The Memo from the Public Works Department dated October 9, 2013 shall become part of the approval. 4. A Landscaping Plan will be required as part of the Final PUD Plan approvaf process. 5. All final site plans and building plans are subject to final design review. 6. All signs must meet the Sign Code. 7. All other applicable local, state and federal laws shall apply. Findinas: 1. Quality Site Planning. The PUD plan is tailored to the specific characteristics of the site and achieves a higher quality of site planning and design than generally expected under conventional provisions of the ordinance. 2. Preservation. The PUD plan preserves and protects substantial desirable portions of the site's characteristics, open space and sensitive environmental features including steep slopes, trees, scenic views, creeks, wetlands and open waters. 3. Efficient—Effective. The PUD plan includes efficient and effective use (which includes preservation) of the land. 4. Compatibility. The PUD Plan results in development compatible with adjacent uses and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and redevelopment plans and goals. 5. General Health. The PUD plan is consistent with preserving and improving the general health, safety and general welfare of the people of the City. 6. Meets Requirements. The PUD plan meets the PUD Intent and Purpose provision and all other PUD ordinance provisions. Commissioner Segelbaum returned to the meeting. --Short Recess-- 9. Reports on Meetings of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority, City Council, Board of Zoning Appeals and other Meetings Grimes gave an update on some other planning proposals that are currently going through the planning process including the 3.9.4 apartment project and the Xenia apartment project. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission October 14, 2013 Page 15 10. Other Business • Council Liaison Report No report was given. • Discuss 2014 Planning Commission meeting dates Grimes stated that due to the increase in development proposals recently, staff would like to go back to having two Planning Commission meetings per month. If there are no agenda items however, the meeting would still be cancelled. The Commissioners agreed. 11. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 9:57 pm. Charles D. Segelbaum, Secretary Lisa Wittman, Recording Secretary JOINT WATER COMMISSION MINUTES Golden Valley - Crystal - New Hope Meeting of August 7, 2013 The Golden Valley— Crystal — New Hope Joint Water Commission meeting was called to order at 1:37 p.m. in the City of Golden Valley Council Conference Room. Commissioners Present Tom Burt, City Manager, Golden Valley Kirk McDonald, City Manager, New Hope Anne Norris, City Manager, Crystal Staff Present Randy Kloepper, Utilities Superintendent, Crystal Guy Johnson, Director of Public Works, New Hope Jeannine Clancy, Director of Public Works, Golden Valley Dave Lemke, Utilities Supervisor, Golden Valley Sue Virnig, Finance Director, Golden Valley Pat Schutrop, Administrative Assistant, Golden Valley Minutes of Julv 3, 2013 Meetinq MOVED by McDonald, seconded by Norris to approve the minutes of the July 3, 2013 meeting as presented. Motion carried. Inspection Prouosal for Golden Vallev Reservoir While the Golden Valley reservoir was out of service due to the Water Meter Replacement Project, the TAC recommended the reservoir be inspected. KLM Engineering, Inc. completed the inspection of the reservoir and submitted an agreement in the amount of $7,200 for the work. Golden Valley staff received a favorable verbal report and is waiting for KLM to submit the written report. MOVED by McDonald, seconded by Norris to approve the inspection agreement with KLM Engineering, Inc. in the amount of$7,200. Motion carried. Emerqencv Water Supply Svstem Desiqn Request for Proposals Tom Mathisen is finishing preparation of the request for proposals. The TAC has agreed on a list of consultants to forward the RFP. The goal is to hire a consultant by fall. The proposals submitted will include costs and the financial plan for the emergency wells will be developed from those costs. The JWC would like to receive this information by November 2013. The TAC will provide an update at the next meeting. Emerqencv 36-Inch Watermain Break Update The emergency repair is completed and the road is restored with only striping remaining. Crystal's costs are coming in under $190,000. With the addition of road repairs, the total costs are just under$350,000 for the project. A punch list of items remains and scheduled to be completed in the fall. County Road 9 Trunk Watermain Proiect Update The next project meeting with the consultant and Hennepin County is scheduled for 1 pm on August 13 at the City of Crystal. The TAC would like to look at creative ways to keep the Crystal Reservoir in service during the construction. A model does exist; however, if needs Joint Water Commission August 7, 2013 Page 2 of 2 to be updated. The first step wouid be to get the model updated and then meet with New Hope and Crystal to look at all opportunities. A portion of the work will take place in April and the reservoir would not be offline for e�ended periods. Other Business • A draft amendment to the Minneapolis water agreement has been prepared; however, there is concern about holding the JWC to specific time lines. Tom Burt will discuss the concerns with Scott Harder, Environmental Financial Group, Inc. This item will be discussed again at the next JWC meeting. Next Meetinq The next scheduled meeting is September 4, 2013 at 1:30 pm. Adiournment Chair Burt adjourned the meeting at 1:50 pm. Thomas D. Burt, Chair ATTEST: Pat Schutrop, Recording Secretary MINUTES Human Rights Commission (HRC) City of Golden Valley 7800 Golden Valley Road Golden Valley, MN 55427 Council Conference Room September 24, 2013 Commissioners present: Andrew Snope, Chair Adam Buttress, Vice-Chair Jonathan Burris Brian Cook Christopher Jordan Carla Johnson Ethan Meirovitz Payton Perkins Commissioners absent: Debra Reisner City Council Liaison: DeDe Scanlon, Council Member Staff Liaison: Chantell Knauss Assistant City Manager Prior to the meeting, Knauss distributed to Commissioners Cook and Meirovitz information from Northwest Hennepin Human Services that was provided at the July 30, 2013 HRC meeting, as well as the DVD from the June 12, 2013 Council/Commissions/Boards training on the Open Meeting Law and Data Practices Act which was presented by an attorney from the League of MN Cities Insurance Trust. The meeting was convened at 6:31 pm by Chair Snope. Approval of August 27, 2013 Minutes Motion by Commissioner Cook, second by Gommissioner Burris to approve the minutes with the following corrections: revise arrival time of Commissioner Burris from 6:05 to 6:35 pm, Commissioner Meirovitz volunteered to contact the Assistant Principle at Hopkins Sr. High School (rather than Jr. High School), and various grammatical revisions. Motion carried 8-0. Council Updates The City Council at their September 3, 2013 Regular Meeting, received the HRC's Resolution 13-01, Recommending the City Council Publicly Proclaim that Golden Valley is a Welcoming City for All People and Acknowledging the Minnesota Marriage Equality Act of 2013. Human Rights Commission September 24,2013 Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 5 Update on September 11, 2013 National Day of Service and Remembrance Community Volunteer Event Chair Snope and Commissioner Johnson reported there were 23 Golden Valley volunteers that participated in the HRC's September 11 Day of Service and Remembrance volunteer event and contributed 46 hours of time. The group worked on sorting and packing 6800 pounds of potatoes. Update on Global Golden Vallev (GGV) meeting from September 16 GGV is working on their Multi-Cultural Day at Market in the Valley for 2014, possibly earlier in the summer. GGV is working on a program that would feature students from Armstrong High School sharing what they experienced and learned during their visit to Japan as part of the Kakahashi/New Youth Exchange Program. Another program that GGV is working on for Winter/Spring is entitled, "Who is Your Neighbor: Stories from Around the Globe." This would include people from within the community, representing diverse countries and cultures speaking on a panel. For 2014, GGV is considering the July 4 Naturalization Ceremony as well as Multi-Cultural Day at Market in the Valley. Commissioners discussed if there should be a HRC member assigned to attend the GGV meetings. It was the consensus of the Commission to continue to receive the GGV meeting notices and inform Knauss if anyone is able to attend the meeting. Planninq Progress on "MN Nice?" Community Event Commissioner Jordan reported that "MN Nice?" Director Alec Fischer agreed to reduce his speaking fee to $175, plus $20 for travel expenses. Mr. Fischer is available to participate on Thursday, November 21, 2013. There was discussion on the fees and whether or not the HRC should expend funds for the speaker or have the panelists consist of other professionals that don't require a fee. Commissioner Perkins offered to use his contacts to see if Mr. Fischer would consider participating on the panel for a further reduced fee. Council Member Scanlon confirmed there are budgeted funds for the HRC and the Council's intent for the funds is that they be spent on speakers, facilities, etc. that would further the goals of the HRC. Commissioner Cook stated he thought the event would be successful without the need for the Director of the film being present and saving the expense of the speaking fee and travel costs. Commissioner Jordan also contacted Amber Spaniol, Director of Health Services with the Robbinsdale School District and she is forwarding the request for a panel participant to District Administration. Commissioner Meirovitz stated he had made contact with Trenton Lawson, Assistant Principal of Hopkins Sr. High School who was receptive to the idea and did not provide a firm response. Commissioner Meirovitz will contact him again. Human Rights Commission September 24,2013 Meeting Mi�utes Page 2 of 5 Commissioner Meirovitz received confirmation from Rachel Moran, Licensed Marriage and Family Therapist, is willing to serve on the panel. Commissioner Meirovitz offered to contact OutFront Minnesota. He also offered to work with the Volunteer Coordinator from the State Fair for marketing and advertising the event. Commissioner Burris will contact OutFront MN to inquire if they would be able to facilitate the panel discussion. There was a discussion on the goal of the event as to whether the focus would be to advertise and draw attendance from the Metro Area or to draw attendance from the Golden Valley community. The consensus of the Commission was to market the event to be focused on participation by the Golden Valley community. The City of St. Louis Park Human Rights Commission in partnership with the school district held a "Bully" event on September 23, 2013. No one present was able to attend the event. Knauss will contact St. Louis Park to get more information on their event. Knauss reported that the Allianz auditorium is not available as Allianz no longer allows the use of their auditorium for outside organizations due to scheduling conflicts with their own programs. Commissioners discussed alternative locations for holding the event, including: Perpich Center for the Arts Auditorium, Sandburg School, Brookview Grill, Golden Valley Library, Meadowbrook School, Hopkins High School Auditorium, Golden Valley Historical Society, and City Hall. Commissioners discussed unknown specifics at other locations, requirements for staffing outside facilities and timeliness of getting facilitators and speakers confirmed for the event to move forward on November 21, 2013. Motion by Commissioner Burris, second by Commissioner Meirovitz to conduct the "MN Nice?" event on November 21, 2013 from 6:30- 8:00 pm at Golden Valley City Hall Council Chambers and authorize expending a total of$195 for Alec Fischer's speaking fee and travel expenses. Motion carried 7-1. Commissioner Cook cast the dissenting vote. It was the consensus of the Commission that details for the "MN Nice?" event need to be finalized at the October meeting to move forward with advertising and marketing for November 21. 2014 Work Plan Ideas: Martin Luther King, Jr. — Day of Service As previously requested, Knauss distributed a list of non-profit organizations (and the services they provide) that were granted allocations through the Golden Valley Human Services Fund was distributed to Commissioners. For 2013, the allocations went to: Canvas Health/Crisis Connection, Greater Minneapolis Crisis Human Rights Commission September 24,2013 Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 5 Nursery, Northwest Suburban Dinner At Your poor, PRISM, Senior Community Services HOME Program, Senior Community Services Outreach, TreeHouse, and YMCA-New Hope Branch. Commissioner Meirovitz expressed his concern with partnering with PRISM as he had an uncomfortable experience with the organization in the past when he volunteered in that they began the volunteer orientation had religious implications. Council Member Scanlon explained that PRISM has been contributing to various needs of Golden Valley residents for decades and she is very supportive of any partnership efforts the HRC would want to make with PRISM for an event. Commissioners discussed promoting a Day of Service which would include promoting the community to volunteer at various non-profit organizations. Commissioners again discussed the idea of hosting the General Mills Martin Luther King, Jr. Day Breakfast at a satellite location with a live broadcast. General Mills sponsors the event each year in downtown Minneapolis and tickets are difficult to acquire and sell out quickly. The event is broadcast live on TPT at 8:00 am. Due to being a Federal Holiday, there are security and staffing challsnges to using City Hall for such an event. Commissioner Johnson volunteered to contact a person she knows on the General Mills Foundation to see what options are available for hosting a satellite location. Commissioner Johnson also stated Second Harvest Heartland has a Community Room that seats 50 people that may be available for use as their facility is open on the holiday, given that it is such an active volunteer day for their organization. It was the consensus of the Commission that all 2014 Work Plan ideas need to be brought forth at the next meeting so a general timeline can be developed to present to the City Council, along with the Annual Report. Because Martin Luther King, Jr. Day observance is on January 20, the HRC would need to present the 2014 Work Plan to the Council yet this year. Human Riqhts Commission Event Logo and Brandinq Knauss explained she had met with Communications staff to draft ideas for a logo for HRC events and marketing ideas. It was explained that the logo would be used for the Commission's events and not the HRC itself, as the City Council and other City Boards and Commissions do not have a separate logo. Similar to the City's "Mighty Tidy Day," the idea would be to market all HRC events under the same logo, so that they are immediately recognizable in the community as HRC related, no matter what type of event it is. Knauss asked Commissioners what thoughts come to mind when they think of human rights. Some responses were: people, equality, freedom. These were some of the same ideas that staff had brought up when working on possible logos. Knauss distributed some draft logos for discussion and purposes, not for selection, and explained how some of the ideas had been developed. Commissioners were very favorable to the ideas proposed and really liked the Human Rights Commission September 24,2013 Meeting Minutes Page 4 of 5 idea of"HRC Conversations" which could be applied universally to events. Knauss will bring back the Commissioners comments to Communications staff. September 13, 2013 StarTribune Article, "Ban on Gay Men Giving Blood Overdue for a Chanqe" Commissioner Burris provided information from the article which opines that the restriction on gay men not being able to donate blood should be changed, given the thorough screening of all donors, regardless of sexual orientation, and donated blood. Adjourn Motion by Commissioner Burris, second by Commissioner Meirovitz to adjourn the meeting at 8:13 pm. Motion carried 8-0. Follow-up Items: • Commissioner Meirovitz to re-contact Trenton Lawson, Asst. Principal at Hopkins Sr. High School. • Commissioner Burris — contact Monica Meyer, Executive Director of OutFront Minnesota to see if she would be interested in facilitating "MN Nice?" discussion. • Commissioner Reisner—find out who facilitated the "Bully" discussion at the Lagoon Theatre event and make contact with that person on availability and interest in facilitating "MN Nice?" discussion. • Knauss to work with Communications staff to further develop HRC Conversations logo. • Knauss to reserve City Council Chambers for November 21, 2013. • Commissioner Johnson to speak with contact at General Mills Foundation on options for sponsoring/hosting a satellite viewing of their Martin Luther King, Jr. Day event. • All Commissioners to bring back ideas for the 2014 Work Plan. Respectfully Submitted, Chantell Knauss Assistant City Manager Approved by HRC: Human Rights Commission September 24,2013 Meeting Minutes Page 5 of 5 GOLDEN VALLEY ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION Regular Meeting Minutes September 23, 2013 Present: Commissioners Tracy Anderson, Tonia Galonska, Lynn Gitelis , Dawn Hill, Jim Stremel, Kyle Turner, Debra Yahle; Jeannine Clancy, Public Works Director, Eric Eckman, Public Works Specialist and Lisa Nesbitt, Administrative Assistant 1. Call to Order Stremel called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. 2. Approval of Reqular Meetinq Minutes —Julv 22, 3013 MOVED by Turner, seconded by Gitelis, and the motion carried unanimously to approve the minutes of the July 22, 2Q13 meeting. 3. Natural Resource Manaqement Plan The City received a proposal from SEH, Inc. to update the existing Natural Resource Inventory and develop a framework for the overall plan. Joint meetings will be held with other commissions over the next three months to discuss the results of the inventory, develop goals and priorities as well as an outline for the plan. A second proposal will be obtained late in the year for the completion of the Natural Resource Management plan in 2014. 4. Orqanizational Business The Mayor contacted Stremel regarding the following three items: Council changed the term limits for commission chairs and vice chairs to one year. A resident requested a community garden in Wesley Park. Clancy will contact the Mayor for more details. Gitelis suggested staff contact Gardening Matters, the organization that assists with community gardens in Minneapolis Joint agreement with Three Rivers Park District to manage Rice Lake Nature Area (letter from Mayor to Park District on-file). The commission expressed an interesting in staying involved if this moves forward. 5. ProqramlProiect Updates Summary on-file � 6. Commission Member Council Reports Anderson reported that the first reading of the revised recreational fire ordinance has occurred before Council. 7. Other Business Gitelis reported that the Clean Energy Job Coalition has their first session. Minutes of the Environmental Commission September 23, 2013 Page 2 of 2 8. Ad'ourn MOVED by Hill, seconded by Turner, and the motion carried to adjourn. The meeting adjourned at 8:30 pm. The next scheduled meeting will be October 28, 2013 at 7 pm. Lisa Nesbitt Administrative Assistant Golden Valley Human Services Fund (GVHSF) Meeting Minutes October 14, 2013 Present: Hilmer Erickson, Kathryn Frommer, Alan Ingber. Carolyn Kaehr, Craig McDaniels, Connie Sandler, Toots Vodovoz and Peggy Watkins. Also present: Joanie Clausen, Council Liaison, and Sue Virnig, Acting Staff Liaison. Not Attending: Amy Clements, Elissa Heilicher, Andrew Wold Call to Order: Sandler called the meeting to order at 6:45 p.m. Agenda Changes or Additions: Distribution of Guidelines for Board and Commission members, Data Privacy Training DVD and updated roster was added to the agenda. September 9, 2013 minutes: Erickson moved and Vodovoz seconded the motion to approve the minutes from September 9. The motion passed unanimously. Agency Presentations: PRISM and Community Mediation agencies presented at the meeting. Other Business: TCGMC: Sandler has been in contact with the director of the Chorus. March 14 is the date that works with Breck School. Community Foundation: Sandler has resigned her position with the Community Foundation and asked if anyone was interested in serving on the board. No response from attending members. Sandler reminded the members that the next meeting is scheduled for Monday, November 11, 2013. Adjournment: Erickson moved to adjourn the meeting, Watkins seconded the motion. The meeting was adjourned at 8:15 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Connie Sandler, GVHSF Chair Sue Virnig, Acting Staff Liaison MINUTES Envision Connection Project Executive Board September 19, 2013 7:30 pm City Hall Council Conference Room Directors Present: Lynn Gitelis (Chair), Jim Heidelberg (Vice-Chair), Mike Berger, Sharon Glover, Cindy Inselmann, Helene Johnson, Philip Lund, Wendy Rubinyi, Mike Schleif, Marshall Tanick, Blair Tremere Directors Absent: Dean Penk Staff Liaison: Cheryl Weiler, Communications Manager Guests: Larry Fonnest, Golden Valley resident and 2013 City Council candidate 1. Call to Order The meeting was called to order by Gitelis at 7:35 pm with a quorum. 2. Approval of Agenda Rubinyi added Golden Valley Greenways presentation, Lund added Bridge Builders quarerly report and interface with Golden Valley Days, and Tanick added interfacing with Golden Valley Country Club on its upcoming centennial events. Approval of agenda moved by Schlief and seconded by Lund. Motion carried. 3. Approval of August 15, 2013 Minutes Moved by Heidelberg; seconded by Tremere. Motion carried. 4. New Business Work Plan Gitelis raised the question about spending time in meetings discussing projects that are already launched and no longer in need of intensive Board direction, like the Lilac Planting Party or the Board's presence at Valley Days. Tremere agreed, and Lund suggested the Board could take reports. Johnson reminded the Board that as a planning group, it needs reports in formative stages. The group then embarked on a discussion about the need for an overall "What's Happening In Golden Valley" calendar to help prevent overlap of community events. Tremere suggested this could be a small spark if someone was willing to manage it. Schleif offered to buy the domain, set up the calendar, and maintain it but said he was unable to solicit events for the calendar. Gitelis moved to support the Community Calendar small spark, seconded by Rubinyi. Motion carried. Director Lund voted no. Getting back to the work plan, Tremere suggested deciding before meetings which issues are substantive as agenda items, and Gitelis suggested that subcommittee chairs contact Weiler before the meeting if they need their item on the agenda. Board agreed to try it out. Need For Better Marketing (Schleifl Tremere asked for a definition of marketing, and Schleif suggested doing something different, saying all he sees is bureaucracy and that he has no function. Gitelis pointed out that no Board member is in charge of any one thing, that they all work together. Schleif replied he didn't see how anything is being marketed at all. Johnson said she'd love to have help marketing Global Golden Valley but isn't sure where it fits with the City. Weiler explained that any time a project used public money or City staff, it would be considered a City project in need of City Council approval. Tremere provided the Trees for Tyrol project as an example of a successful small spark that succeeded without City money or staff involvement, even though it was a project that partnered with the City to improve a park. Tanick asked Schleif to help him with marketing ideas. Schleif said he would like an explanation about why the City won't allow Board members to set up social media sites. Weiler explained that Boards and Commissions, as advisors to the City Council, were governed by City policies and that individuals could not speak for the City without Council authorization. She also explained the City did not currently have a social media policy but was developing one. Weiler said a DVQ was made of the June 12 Council and Board/Commission training on data practices and open meeting law, which included information about social media requirements for cities. Weiler had three copies of the DVD available for those who missed the training and were not at the July meeting when they were distributed to the Board. Berger and Rubinyi each took copies of the DVD. Schleif refused to take a copy. Lund suggested moving on to the next topic on the agenda. Golden Valley Country Club 100th Anniversary Tanick reported that the Golden Valley Country Club is celebrating its 100t" anniversary next year, and he is on the committee. He said one of the Country Club's big thing is building a bridge over Golden Valley Rd. Gitelis suggested Tanick bring back a proposal on how the Envision and the City can interact with the event. Golden Valley Greenways Rubinyi introduced the idea of building greenway bridges over Hwy 55, which she had _ presented at a Council/Manager meeting months ago. She shared her presentation with the Board in a brief outline and proposed it as an idea for walkability, safety, etc. Rubinyi proposed it as an item for discussion to build grass roots support to get it before the City Council for consideration, and she asked the Board to put it on its work plan to build community interest to get initial money for a study to get partners involved. Lund agreed it was an exciting idea but beyond the realm of the Board to pursue and that it would perhaps take a separate meeting. Gitelis explained the role of the Board as helping think through ideas but not doing projects. Tremere asked if Rubinyi had approached the City's Park and Open Space Commission as a partner, reminded the group of the Hwy 100 and I-394 pedestrian bridges, and commented on the difficulty of funding. Gitelis asked if the Board thought the concept had merit and reminded them of their role to help connect people and ideas with resources. Rubinyi said the project needed seed money for connections with the University of Minnesota. Schleif suggested building community support first. Rubinyi said she wants support from the Envision Board—an endorsement to petition the City Council to support a study to get a report to go to county, federal, and state agencies for funding. Tremere suggested talking to Public Works Director Jeannine Clancy and Parks and Recreation Director Rick Birno. He also pointed out the example of Dwight Townes approaching MnDOT regarding funding for the Lilac Project. Lund motioned for approval to support Rubinyi's proposal, Heidelberg seconds. Motion carried. 5. Projects and Council Updates Bridge Builders Lund reported that 15 people attended the Sept 7 Bridge Builders Quarterly Event at the Courage Center. They tried out the new method of group discussion and reporting, which was a good format. Lund suggested planning a winter event, perhaps at the Wirth Park Chalet. The group agreed January would be a good date. Lund will follow up. Lund and Weiler will work together to update the email list for Bridge Builders. 2014 Hall of Fame and Ice Cream Social Tanick reported he is getting closer to meeting with his subcommittees on the Hall of Fame and the Ice Cream Social. Tremere reminded the group of the need populate the Hall of Fame subcommittee and open it to public participation. Gitelis said this would be a topic for the work plan—how to get people on project planning teams and not just as volunteers at the event. Global Golden Vallev Johnson reported that Global Golden Valley is working with some Armstrong students who returned from a study trip to Japan and have to fulfill a requirement for community outreach. They are planning a program and presentation at the Golden Valley library in November. 6. Communications 7. Other Business 2014 Work Plan and Budqet Gitelis and Heidelberg will work on the work plan and annual report and share it with the group at the next meeting. Weiler will try to schedule the Envision report for the December Council/Manager meeting. 8. Future Meetings The next meeting will be Thursday, Oct 17, 2013, 7 pm, City HaI( Council Conference Room. 9. Adjournment Moved by Tanick and seconded by Gitelis. Motion carried. The meeting adjourned at 9:15 pm. Lynn Gitelis, Chair ATTEST: Cheryl Weiler, Staff Liaison From: kyle turner fmailto:turnerkyle(a�hotmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 6:50 AM To: Nesbitt, Lisa Subject: apologies and goodbye Lisa, I'm sorry I didn't make it to the Environmental Committee meeting last night. In particular, I'm sorry, because I wanted to tell the Committee personnally that I will be unable to continue to serve as a member of GV's Environmental Committee as I have purchased a house in Crystal and am currently living there. Please give my regards and best wishes to everyone. Cheers Kyle Gl��1 D�� �,� , Finance Department 763-593-80131763-593-8109(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting December 3, 2013 Agenda Item 3. E. Approval of 2014-2018 Capital Improvement Program Prepared By Sue Virnig, Finance Director Summary The 2014-2018 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) was presented to the City Council at the Council/Manager meeting on September 10, October 8 and November 12, 2013 and was approved by the Planning Commission at their meeting of October 14, 2013. The financing section outlines the appropriate budget for each section. The CIP is located on the City website under http://www.�oldenvallevmn.�ov/bud�et/index.php. Attachments Planning Commission Meeting minutes dated October 14, 2013 (1 page) Resolution Approving the 2014-2018 Capital Improvement Program (1 page) 2014-2018 Capital Improvement Program (distributed previously) Recommended Action Motion to adopt Resolution Approving the 2014-2018 Capital Improvement Program. Regular Meeting of the Golden Valley Planning Commission October 14, 2013 2. Presentation of Capital Improvement Program 2014-2018 — Sue Virnig, City Finance Director Sue Virnig, Finance Director, explained that the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is a 5-year financing planning instrument used to identify needed capital projects and to delineate the financing and timing of associated projects. Because of its relationship with the City's Comprehensive Plan the CIP is reviewed by the Planning Commission annually. Segelbaum referred to page five of the Financing section and noted there was a comment regarding Tax Increment Bonds for the Golden Hills district and asked for a status on the TIF District. Virnig stated that the Golden Hills district started in 1984 and was extended by special legislation to 2015 in order to pay off debt. Segelbaum questioned if this is a separate issue from the Xenia development and other developments in that area. Virnig stated that was correct and noted that the Xenia development is in a TIF district but they did not require tax increment help. Waldhauser said she noticed some significant investments in street upgrades and repairs for some areas targeted for future development. She asked if there are any upgrades proposed for the I-394 corridor area. Virnig stated that the residential streets behind the proposed 3.9.4 development were recently upgraded and noted that there are 12 miles of streets left to complete in the entire city. Waldhauser questioned if there will be any upgrades in the area around Xenia and Laurel. Virnig stated that the Metropolitan Council did some sewer lining in that area and some traffic upgrades are being considered along Xenia and Golden Hills. Segelbaum referred to the Building section and noted that there is $100,000 budgeted for a community center needs assessment. He asked if that means the City is in the early stages of improving Brookview Community Center. Virnig said yes, there will be a needs study conducted. MOVED by McCarty, seconded by Cera and motion carried unanimously to recommend approval of the 2014-2018 Capital Improvement Program as it is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Resolution 13-104 December 3, 2013 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION APPROVING 2014-2018 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the proposed 2014-2018 Capital Improvement Program on October 14, 2013; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the 2014-2018 Capital Improvement Program at the September 10, October 8 and November 12, 2013 Council/Manager meetings; and WHEREAS, financing for projects outlined in the 2014-2018 Capital Improvement Program will be reviewed each year and provided for by current approved budget or specifically identified in the financing section in this document; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Golden Valley approves the 2014-2018 Capital Improvement Program. Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: Susan M. Virnig, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by the City Clerk. ���� �� Finance Department 763-593-80131763-593-8109(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting December 3, 2013 Agenda Item 3. F. Adoption of 2014-2015 Budget for Enterprise, Special Revenue and Internal Services Funds Prepared By Sue Virnig, Finance Director Summary The 2014-2015 Budgets of the above funds with changes since the Proposed Budgets were submitted to the Council in September and October. All budgets were reviewed previously at the Council/Manager meetings in September, October and November. Brookview Golf Course 2014- 2015 budget now includes the new Lawn Bowling program.The 2015 Budget is approved "in concept" only and will be revised with the budget process in 2014. Attachments Resolution Adopting the 2014-2015 Budget for Enterprise, Special Revenue and Internal Services Funds (1 page) Recommended Action Motion to adopt Resolution Adopting the 2014-2015 Budget for Enterprise, Special Revenue and Internal Services Funds. Resolution 13-105 December 3, 2013 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE 2014-2015 BUDGETS FOR ENTERPRISE, SPECIAL REVENUE AND INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS WHEREAS, in 2013, the City Manager presented a biennial budget cycle with a proposed current budget year and an "in concepY' budget proposal for the second year; and WHEREAS, this proposed 2014 operating budget is submitted by the City in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and other applicable laws in effect on this date; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Golden Valley, Minnesota, that the 2014 Budgets are hereby given final approval. FUND DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 7000 Recycling $447,135 7120 Water and Sewer Utility 8,229,435 7150 Brookview Golf Course 1,911,990 7200 Motor Vehicle Licensing 400,210 7300 Storm Sewer Utility 3,341,960 2020 Human Services Fund 58,000 8200 Vehicle Maintenance 343,100 TOTAL 2014 BUDGET $14 731,830 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council that the sources of financing are through user fees, fundraisers, charges for services and those applicable revenues described in each specific budget. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council declares its intent to take all necessary actions legally permissible to the submission and approval of the City's budget both proposed and final. Shepard Harris, Mayor ATTEST: Susan M. Virnig, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by the City Clerk. ���� �� Finance Department 763-593-8013/763-593-8109(faxj Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting December 3, 2013 Agenda Item 3. G. Second Consideration -Ordinance#512 - Establishing A 2014 Master Fee Schedule Prepared By Sue Virnig, Finance Director Summary At its meeting of November 19, 2013 the City Counci) adopted on First Consideration the changes to the 2014 Master Fee Schedule. Staff has reviewed the current master fee schedule for the City and is recommending the Council adopt the 2014 Master Fee Schedule. The schedule shows both 2013 and 2014 fees. Any difference in fees is shown in bold type. The utility rates will be effective for any billing after April 1, 2014. Attachments Ordinance#512, Establishing A 2014 Master Fee Schedule (19 pagesj Recommended Action Motion to adopt on Second Consideration, Ordinance #512, Establishing A 2014 Master Fee Schedule. ORDINANCE NO. 512, 2ND SERIES AN ORDINANCE AMENDlNG THE CITY CODE Establishing A 2014 Master Fee Schedule The City Council for the City of Golden Valley hereby ordains: Section 1. The City Code requires that certain fees for City services and licenses be established from time to time by the City Council. Section 2. The Master Fee Schedule attached hereto as Exhibit A is hereby adopted as the city's fee schedule effective January 1, 2014, unless otherwise noted and shall be added to Chapter 25 of the City Code. Section 3. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicabie to the Entire City Code including Penalty for Violation" is hereby adopted in its entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 4. This ordinance shall take effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law. Adopted by the City Council this 3rd day of December, 2013. /s/Shepard M. Harris Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: /s/Susan M. Virniq Susan M. Virnig, City Clerk City of Golden Valley 2014 Proposed Master Fee Schedule-Exhibit A 2013 2014 Proposed Fee Fee Permits Building&Fire Permit Fees based on fee schedule below. Mandatory State Surcharge:per permit is a minimum of.50 and when a permit fee is over$1,000 in value the state surcharge is.0005 times the permit value. Surcharge is remitted to MN State Treasurer. Permit Cancellation Policy:80%af the permit fee will be returned upon written notice of cancellation. If job has been started no refund will be made. No surcharge or plan review fees will be returned(includes the fees for stormwater management,right-of-way(ROW)and tree preservation permits). Building/Fire/Commercial Mechanical Plan Review Fee-65%of the permit fee(no surcharge) re-inspection fee 100.00 100.00 Administrative 75.00 75.OQ Seasonal, Farm Produce,Christmas Tree Sales,etc in Commercial Zoning District Electrical State Surcharge-each permit 5.00 5.00 All Services new,replace or repair There is a$2 per circuit charge for replacing circuits that are disconnected in the old service panel and reconnected in the new panel. 0 to 300 Amp 50.00 400 Amp 58.00 500 Amp 72.00 600 Amp 86.00 800 Amp 114.00 1000 Amp 142.00 1100 Amp 156.00 1200 Amp 170.00 Add$14.00 for each additional 100 Amps. Circuits and Feeders The inspection fee for the installation,addition,alteration or repair of each circuit, feeder,feeder tap or set of transformer secondary conductors: 0 to 30 Amp 8.00 31 to 100 Amp 10.00 101 to 200 Amp 15.00 300 Amp 20.00 400 Amp 25.00 500 Amp 30.00 600 Amp 35.00 700 Amp 40.00 Add$5.00 for each additional 100 Amps. Minimum Fee Minimum permit fee is$35.00 plus$5.00 State surcharge.This is for one inspection only. Minimum fee for rough-in inspection and final is$70.00 plus$5.00 State surcharge. Maximum Fee Maximum fee for single family dwelling or townhouse not over 200 Amps is$150.00 plus$5.00 State surcharge. Maximum of 2 RI and 1 final inspection. 1 City of Golden Valley 2014 Proposed Master Fee Schedule-Exhibit A 2013 2014 Proposed Fee Fee Permits(continued) Electrical(continued) Apartment Buildings Fee per unit of an apartment or condominium complex is$70.00.This does not cover service and house wiring. Swimming Pool $35.00 per inspection+circuits Traffic Signals $7.00 per each standard Street lights and parking lot lights $4.00 per each standard Transformers and Generators $8.00 per unit+$.40 for each KVA up to 100 KVA+$,30 for each KVA above 100 KVA Retro Fit Lighting $.65 per fixture Sign Transformer $8.00 per transformer Remote Control and Signal Circuits $.75 per device Reinspection fee(only one final per job) $35.00 THE FEE IS DOUBLED IF THE WORK STARTS BEFORE THE PERMIT IS ISSUED. Fire Alarm System(New Installation or Alteration of Existing) Up to the 1st$1,200 in value 50.00 50.00 Over $1,200 value-use fire suppression fee Fire Commercial Cooking Ventilation Systems Inspection 75.00 75.00 Re-inspection 150.00 150.00 Fire Pumps 200.00 200.00 Fire Suppression&Special Fire Suppression Systems: FM 200 system,CO2 systems,spray booths,kitchen extinguisher systems,hoods,etc. No change No change Total valuation based on below fee schedule: Value Range 2004 LMC/AMM Recommendation $150 $500 $25.00 $501 $2,000 $25.00 for the first$500 $3.25/additional$100 $2,001 $25,000 $73.50 for the first$2,000 $14.75/additional$1,000 $25,001 $50,000 $415.75 for the first$25,000 $10.75/additional$1,000 $50,OQ1 $100,000 $682.50 for the first$50,000 $7.50/additional$1,000 $100,001 $500,000 $1,053.50 for the first$100,000 $6.00/additional$1,000 $500,001 $1,000,000 $3,427.75 for the first$500,000 $5.00/additional$1,000 $1,000,001 and up $5,945.25 for the first$1,000,000 $4.00/additional$1,000 2 City of Golden Valley 2014 Proposed Master Fee Schedule-Exhibit A 2013 2014 Proposed Fee Fee Perm�ts{cont�nued) Fireworks/Pyrotechnic Special Effects 100.00 100.00 Permit requires rental of fire engine and crew for stand-by at display House/Building Moving 300.00 300.00 Demolition 300.00 300.00 Mechanical:HVAC,Gas Piping,Refrigeration and Fireplace (Includes all types of fireplaces-masonry,gas,gas log,gas insert,etc.) Value Permit charge $0- $999 $25.00 $1,001- $5,000 $31.50+2,60%over$1000 $5,001- $10,000 $135.50+2.15%over$5000 $10,001- $25,000 $243.00+1.85%a over$10,000 $25,000- $50,000 $520.50+1.65%over$25,000 $50,001- over $933.00+1.30%over$50,000 Native Vegetation Landscape Permit 100.00 100.00 Parade/SpecialEvent 25.00 25.00 Petroleum/Compress Gas Tanks Installation-per dispenser 75.00 75.00 Installation-per tank 75.00 75.00 Piping associated with tanks 75.00 75.00 Removal-per tank 75.00 75.00 Temporary LP Tank(per site) 75.00 75.00 Temporary above ground fuel tanks(per site) 75.00 75.00 Plan Review Fee-65%of the fee(no surcharge) Plumbing and Piping Fixtures Includes hydraulic sewer valves,rain water leaders,and alteration to existing systems. Value Permitcharge $0- $999 $25.00 25.00 25.00 $1,001- $5,000 $31.50+2.60%over$1000 $5,001- $10,000 $135.50+2.15%over$5000 $10,001- $25,000 $243.00+1.85%over$10,000 $25,001- $50,000 $520.50+1.65%over$25,000 $50,001- over $933.00+1.30%over$50,000 Right Of Way Driveway Replacement Permit 100.00 100.00 Permanent Obstruction Permit,per obstruction(includes courtesy benches) 100.00 100.00 Temporary Obstruction permit No Charge No Charge Temporary Access Permit 25.00 25.00 In Boulevard Excavation Permit per opening 100.00 100.00 In Pavement Excavation Permit per opening(includes curb alterations) 200.00 200.00 Overhead Utility Repair per location No Charge No Charge 3 City of Golden Valley 2014 Proposed Master Fee Schedule-Exhibit A 2013 2014 Proposed Fee Fee Permits(continued) ` Right Of Way(continued) � Underground Utility: Len�th Permit Char�e 0 to 100 Feet $250 administrative fee+$1/foot over 100 Feet $350 administrative fee+$.50/foot over 100 feet Service Drop meeting conditions: No charge No charge Not parallel to right-of way at least 10'from any City facility or utility, less than 1'wide,and depth in accord with law or,if none,industry standard Stormwater Management Land Disturbance up to one-half acre(0 to 21,779 square feet) 100.00 100.00 Land Disturbance of one-half acre or more(21,780 square feet and upJ Z00.00 200.00 Sign Permit Base fee 50.00 50.00 Area fee(per sq ft of sign area) +2.75/sq ft +2,75/sq ft Temporary Sign over 18 sq ft over 18 sq ft Standpipe Installation of each standpipe(up to 5 floors) 50.00 50.00 Each additional floor 25.00 25.00 Temporary Certificate of Occupancy Partial Certificate of Occupancy 100.00 100.00 Temporary Certificate of Occupancy 100.00 100.00 Extension of Temporary Certificate of Occupancy 200.00 200.00 Penalty for expired Temporary Certificate of Occupancy 300.00 300.00 Tent/Canopy Inspections-required for tent exceeding 200 sq ft and 50.00 50.00 canopies exceeding 400 sq ft(per site) each additional tent and/or canopy(per site) 25.00 25.00 Tree Preservation Permit 100.00 100.00 Tree Preservation Mitigation Form-per caliper inch 150.00 150.00 Utility Permits Water Meter Permit 100.00 100.00 Water Tapping Permit 100.00 100.00 Water Cut-off Permit 100.00 100.00 Sewer Permit(connection) 100.00 100.00 Sewer Repair Permit 100.00 100.00 Sewer Cut-off Permit 100.00 100.00 4 City of Golden Valley 2014 Proposed Master Fee Schedule-Exhibit A 2013 2014 Proposed Fee Fee Licenses Renewal Date Auctioning Auctioneers do not need to be licensed in the City of Golden Valley.However,they have to show us a copy of a license or bond from the county or state and provide us a letter on the date,time and place of the auction. Chicken Coop License Initial Application�es�iga�iew Fee 50.00 75.00 Annual License Renewal Fee 1-Apr 25.00 25.00 Cigarettes-Tobacco Products over the counter 1-Jan 275.00 275.00 Contractors-Heating,Ventilation,Air Cond and Refrigeration 1-Apr 75.00 75.00 Dog Kennel-per kennel 1-Apr 200.00 200.00 Entertainment Amusement and Shows 1-Apr 50.00 50.00 (movies-per screen;caravans,circuses,amusement rides) Bowling Affey(each lane) 1-Apr 15.00 15.00 Dancing&Entertainment 1-Apr 375.00 375.00 Pinball Machine,Video Game or Pool Table each location 1-Apr 15.00 15.00 each device 1-Apr 15.00 15.00 Fireworks Retail consumer fireworks that sell other items 1-May 100.00 100.00 Retail consumer fireworks,retailers that sell only fireworks 1-May 350.00 350.00 Garbage Haulers-per vehicle 1-Apr 50.00 50.00 (See also Recylcing Haulers) Gasoline Stations Per Location Dispensers 1-4-u�-Ee�eu�(each) 1-Apr 75.00 75.00 Over four dispensers(each) 50.00 50.00 Lawful Gambling License 1-1an First year 250.00 250.00 Renewal after 1st year 100.00 100.00 Liquor License Application Packet 20.00 20.00 Liquor-Investigation Fee (Liquor On-sale,Off-sale,and Sunday sale and Wine) new applicant 3,000.00 3,000.00 $500.00 non-refundable administrative fee plus actual costs for investigation Liquor-Miscellaneous Change thru the year per change 100.00 100.00 Liquor On,Off and Sunday Sale and Wine(renewal or misc changes) 5 City of Golden Valley 2014 Proposed Master Fee Schedule-Exhibit A 2013 2014 Proposed Fee Fee licenses(continued) Renewal Date. Liquor License�State!aw) Sunday sale 1-Jul 200.00 200.00 Off-sale 340A.408 1-Jul 200.00 200.00 On-sale 1-Jul 8,000.00 8,000.00 Wine On-sale 1-Jul 2,000.00 2,000.00 Club 1-Jul up to 200 members 300.00 300.00 200-500 members 500.00 500.00 501-1,000 members 650.00 650.00 1,001-2,000 members 800.00 800.00 2001-4000 members 1,000.00 1,000.00 4001-6000 members 2,000.00 2,000.00 Over 6000 members 3,000.00 3,000.00 Liquor-Non-Intoxicating Malt�On-sale) 1-Apr 500,00 500.00 (This fee is not charged to applicants holding a wine license and renewed at the time of the wine license renewal date) Liquor-Non-Intoxicating Malt(Off-sale) 1-Apr 150.00 150.00 Massage Therapist-Individual Certificate(each individual/person) 1-Jan 50.00 100.00 Investigation fee 100.00 100.00 Massage Therapist Premise License 1-Jan Operating location 500.00 500.00 Investigation fee 200.00 200.00 New/Used Vehicle Sales 1-Sep 400.00 400.00 Peddlers and Solicitors 1-Jan 1st person 30.00 30.00 Each additional person(up to a max fee of$50.00 per time) 5.00 5.00 Pawnbroker and Precious Metal Dealer Location 1-Jan 5,000.00 5,000.00 Dealer 1-Jan 400.00 400.00 Investigation Fee 3,000.00 3,000.00 $500.00 non-refundable administrative fee plus actual costs for investigation APS Transaction Fee 1.00 1.30 Recycling Haulers(Multi Family Apartment) -per vehicle 1-Apr 50.00 50.00 6 City of Golden Valley 2014 Proposed Master Fee Schedule-Exhibit A 2013 2014 Proposed Fee Fee licenses(continuetl) ; Renewal Date Rental Dwelling License Single Family Dwellings One Unit Dwelling License Expires luly 1 125.00 125.00 Re-inspection 100.00 100.00 Twin Nomes&Duplexes License per Dwelling Unit Expires May 1 125.00 125.00 Re-inspection(per unit/per address) 100.00 100.00 Condominiums&Townhomes License Per Dwelling Unit Expires Sept 1 125.00 125.00 Re-inspection(per unit/per address) 100.00 100.00 Group Homes/homes with services Expires Nov 1 125.00 125.00 License Per Dwelling Unit Re-inspection(per unit/per address) 100.00 100.00 Multiple Unit Dwelling(3 or more units)per building 1-Mar 100.00 0.00 3-50 Units 125.00 51-150 Units 175.00 151+Units 250.00 Re-inspection(per building/per address) 100.00 100.00 License Transfer(pro rate) mfnimum 50.00 50.00 Star Program Fees(Based on participation level) Non-Participant $30/unit $30/unit Levell $12/unit $12/unit Level2 $10/unit $10/unit Level3 $6/unit $6/unit �evel4 $0/unit $0/unit Administrative Citations on(all)Rental Dwellings 1st citation 100.00 100.00 2nd citation 250.00 250.00 3rd citation 500.00 500.00 4th citation and subsequent violations in 12 month period 500.00 500.00 Citation Appeal 25.00 25.00 Sexually Oriented Business License Fee(operating location) 1-1an 5,000.00 5,000.00 Investigation Fee 3,000.00 3,000.00 $500.00 non-refundable administrative fee plus actual costs for investigation 7 City of Golden Valley 2014 Proposed Master Fee Schedule-Exhibit A 2013 2014 Proposed Fee Fee Street Assessmen#s Residential/Single Family/Duplex,per dwelling unit on local street 6,000.00 6,000.00 Multi Unit Residential(more than 2 dwelling units)on local street 76.3/ft 76.3/ft Residential/Single Family/Duplex,per dwelling unit on state aid street 1,500.00 1,500.00 Multi Unit Residential(more than 2 dwelling units)on state aid street 81.71/ft 81.71/ft Other Zonings,Local Streets 91.73/ft 91.73/ft Other Zonings,State Aid Streets 99.21/ft 99.21/ft Administrative Fee for Driveways and/or Sanitary Sewer repairs $250/maximum $250/maximum (Seven percent of total or maximum fee-whichever lessor) Low Income Level for Senior/Retired due to Disability Deferral 2013 HUD Limits 2014 HUD Limits Miscellaneous Fees Address Change 50.00 50.00 Administrative Citations-Non Rental Housing 1st Citation 100.00 100.00 2nd Citation 250.00 250.00 3rd Citation 500.00 500.00 4th Citation and subsequent violations in 12 month period 500.00 500.00 Alarm System-False Alarms(12 month period beginning March 1 of each year upon given notice) 1-3 false alarms 4-10 false alarms 100.00 100.00 11-15 false alarms 150.00 150.00 16 or more false alarms 250.00 250.00 Animal Control Impound fee for dogs 50.00 50.00 Boarding Fee for dogs and cats per day(7 day maximum) 20.00 20.00 Dangerous Dog License 250.00 250.00 Building Plan/Storage Retrieval 50.00 50.00 Certification Fee(Special Assessment) 30.00 30.00 City Cemetery Cemetery Plot 500.00 500.00 Open/Close Fee: Crematory(up to 2 per lot) 200.00 each 200.00 each Burial 750.00 750.00 8 City of Golden Valley 2014 Proposed Master Fee Schedule-Exhibit A 2013 2014 Proposed Fee Fee Miscellaneous Fees�con#i�ued); Documents City Code Full book in binder 200.00 200.00 Updates 15/each 15/each Zoning Chapters Only 10.00 10.00 City Maps:, Plats,Record Drawings,Other Plats(i.e.address maps,building plans,comp pl� 10.00 10.00 Comprehensive Plan Copies of any black and white,letter or legal size documents of 100 or .25/pg .25/pg fewer pages(Minnesota Rules,part 1205.0300,subpart 4.) Copies of any color,letter or legal size documents .33/page .33/page Digital Format Aerial photography time&material time&material Custom Maps or Map Layers time&material time&material Topography time&material time&material Special Assessment Search(non-owner) 15.00 15.00 Video Reproduction(per tape,DVD,CD+shipping) 20.00 20.00 Domestic Partner Registration Initial Registration 40.00 40.00 Amendment/Notice of Termination 25.00 25.00 Certified copy of Registration 5.00 5.00 Equipment Charge per hour Fire Engine(includes personnel) 250.00 250.00 Fire Aerial Truck(includes personnel) 350.00 350.00 Police and Fire Rescue Truck(includes personnel) 250.00 250.00 Utility Vehicle(includes personnel) 100.00 100.00 Squad Car(includes personnel) 100.00 100.00 Utility Equipment(sewer jet,vac truck,sewer camera,sewer rodder) 200.00 Heavy(�er-�a�eF,front end loader,360 Backhoe, Pickup sweeper, 125.00 125.00 tandem axle truck,aerial truck) does not include personnel costs Medium(single axle dump truck,water truck,tractor backhoe,utility tractor/ 80.00 80.00 accessory,15 ft cut lawn mower,brush chipper,asphalt roller)does not include personnel costs Light(truck-one ton and under,air compressor,water pump,generator, 45.00 45.00 steamer,asphalt/saw,concrete,cable tracer,��:)does not include personnel costs Fire Boat(includes personnel) 75.00 75.00 Fire AN(includes personnel) 75.00 75.00 Fire Life Safety Trailer(includes personnel) 200.00 200.00 Gas Lines,construction damage with Fire Department Response 250.00 250.00 Filing Fee(Administrative Citation Appeal)per violation 25.00 25.00 Fingerprinting Golden Valley Resident 10.00 10.00 Anyone employed in GV 25.00 25.00 Forced Tree Removal cost of cost of removal+20% removai+20% Forfeited DWI Vehicle Administrative Fee 750.00 750.00 9 City of Golden Valley 2014 Proposed Master Fee Schedule-Exhibit A 2013 2014 Proposed Fee Fee Misceltaneous Fees(continued), Hydrant Meter Rental Residential(per day+consumption) 2.00 2.00 Commercial(per day+consumption) 5.00 5.00 Deposit(residential) 200.00 200.00 Deposit(commercial) 1000.00 1000.00 Nuisance Service Call Fee(after three calls) 250.00 250.00 Personnel Off Duty Police Officer(minimum applies as determined by 75/hour 75/hour City Manager/designee) Firefighters, Lieutenants,Captains, ^^�••`�•�:-^�Anr�l.nl 9_ A�e�.��n..�gatallion Chief 35/hour 35/hour minimum minimum Public Works Employee 50/hr Sump Pump Inspection 50.00 50.00 Weed Eradication/Lawn mowing-per hour(see minimums) Vacant land-1 hour minimum 125/hr 125/hr Occupied/unoccupied residential/commercial property-3 hour minimum 125/hr 125/hr SECOND OR MORE VIOLATIONS IN ONE SEASON Vacant land-1 hour minimum- 250/hr 250/hr Occupied/unoccupied residential/commercial property-3 hour minimum 250/hr 250/hr Planning&Zoning Fees Conditional Use Items Conditional Use Permit 400.00 400.00 Amendment to Conditional Use Permit 300.00 300.00 Extension for Conditional Use Permit 125.00 125.00 Easement Vacation (each request) 500.00 500.00 Flood Control Mana�ement(Special Permit) 75.00 75.00 Floodplain Search Letter 25.00 25.00 Park Dedication Fees 1%of Land 2%of Land (per Minnesota Statute 462.358) Market Value Market Value Planned Unit Development Preliminary Design Plan 400.00 400.00 Final Plan of Development 400.00 400.00 Extension of Planned Unit Development 150.00 150.00 Planned Unit Development Amendment Preliminary Design Plan 250.00 250.00 Final Plan of Development 250.00 250.00 Extension of Planned Unit Development 150.00 150.00 Planned Unit Development-Minor 250.00 250.00 Rezoning 500.00 500.00 10 City of Golden Valley 2014 Proposed Master Fee Schedule-Exhibit A 2013 2014 Proposed Fee Fee Planning&Zoning Fees{cantinued) Subdivision 400.00 400.00 Extension to Submit Final Plat 125.00 125.00 Subdivision-Minor 250.00 250.00 Extension to Submit Final Plat 125.00 125.00 Variance f�om City Code- Zoning Chapters Single family residential 150.00 200.00 Extension 150.00 150.00 All others 250.00 300.00 Extension 150.00 150.00 Wetland Management(plus professional fees if necessary) 75.00 75.00 Zoning Examination Letter 75.00 100.00 Temporary Retail Sales in Industrial Zone 150.00 150.00 (for each sale,up to five days) Utility Fees Driveway Covers-Replace 90.00 90.00 Hydrant Inspection(Private) 3.00/month Meter Testing(to be returned if ineter is in error of 5%or more of read) 50.00 50.00 Sanitary Sewer Inspections and Compliance Fees(Ordinance No.352) Noncompliant discharge into sanitary sewer(or refuse inspection) Single Family Residential 500/month 500/month Non Single Family Residential 1000/month 1000/month Application fee for noncompliant winter discharge into sanitary sewer 250.00 250.00 Application fee for certificate of sewer regulations compliance Single Family Residential(R-1 or R-2),per structure 250.00 250.00 Non Single Family Residential(all other structures),per structure 750.00 750.00 fee to review residential video record completed by private licensed plumber 100.00 100.00 Fee to review non-residential video record completed by private licensed plumber 375.00 375.00 Water on/off per each event (business day) 50.00 50.00 (after hours) 75.00 75.00 Utility-Manual Read of Water/Sewer Meter 100.00 100.00 Water Meter and Parts(All) At cost+20% At cost+20�0 11 City of Golden Valley 2014 Proposed Master Fee Schedule-Exhibit A 2013 2014 Proposed Fee Fee Util'tty Billing RatQS-EfFective April i,2014 Residentiai'Utility Rates-quarterly billing,' (includes all residential classes except those classified as apartments) ACH Payment Credit (1.00) (1.00) Inspection Fee for Fire lines 6.00 6.00 Penalties(for late payment) 10% 10% Sanitary Sewer(in 1000 gallons) Residential(per dwelling unit)(Flat Rate)-5 and under units-winter qtr consumption 52.60 54.18 Residential(per dwelling unit)(Flat Rate)-6-15 units-winter qtr consumption 56.70 58.44 Residential(per dwelling unit)(Flat Rate)-16-19 units-winter qtr consumption 62.60 64.00 Residential(per dwelling unit)(Flat Rate)-20-25 units-winter qtr consumption 71.07 73.20 Residential(per dwelling unit)(Flat Rate)-26-39 units-winter qtr consumption 92.73 95.52 Residential(per dwelling unit)(Flat Rate)-40-59 units-winter qtr consumption 100.94 110.00 Residential(per dweiling unit)(Flat Rate)-60-79 units-winter qtr consumption 107.12 109.60 Residential(per dwelling unit)(Flat Rate)-80 to 99 units-winter qtr consumption 118.46 133.80 Residential(per dwelling unit)(Flat Rate)-100 and over units-winter qtr consumption 130.82 158.76 Recycling Residential curbside(per unit) 10.00 12.00 Storm Sewer Utility Rate Charge for a Residential Equivalent Factor of 1.00 66.00 66.00 Each single family residential property is considered to be 1/3 of an acre. Street lights Ornamental(per unit) 10.19 10.50 Overhead(per unit) 6.45 6.75 Water Minimum fee,includes up to 1,000 gallons of flow 6.60 7.90 Water meters up to and including 1" 6.60 7.90 Water meters over 1"and including 2" 52.87 54.45 Water meters over 2"and including 4" 73.79 76.00 Water meters over 4" 94.97 97.40 Above 1,000 gallons of flow per quarter up to 79,000(per 1,000 gallons) 4.57 4.75 80,000 gallons and over of flow per quarter(per 1,000 gallons) 4.60 4.78 Water Connection Fee(State Charge for each water hookup) 1.59 1.59 12 City of Golden Valley 2014 Proposed Master Fee Schedule-Exhibit A 2013 2014 Proposed Fee Fee iJtility Bilting RatQS-Effective Apri11,2014(continued) U�igation Accounts(All)-Monthly 6illing Minimum fee,includes up to 1,000 gallons of flow 6.00 8.00 Above 1,000 gallons of flow per month(per 1,000 gallons) 4.58 4.78 ACH Payment Credit (1.00) (1.00) Commerciai&Industrial Monthly Billing ACH Payment Credit (1.00} (1.00j Inspection Fee for Fire lines 2.00 2.00 Penalties(for late payment on monthly billings) 5% 5% Sanitary Sewer Water meters up to and including 1" 6.94 7.14 Water meters over 1"and including 2" 17.62 18.15 Water meters over 2"and including 4" 24.59 25.30 Water meters over 4" 31.65 32.60 Based on per 1,000 gallons 3.69 3.80 Note:Water Meter Flow is used to establish sewer flow unless a separate sewer flow meter has been established. Storm Sewer Utility Rate Charge per acre for property with a Residential Equivalent Factor of 1.00 22.00 22.00 Street Lights Ornamental(per unit) 3.40 3.50 Overhead(per unit) 2.15 2.25 Water Connection Fee (State Charge for each water hookup) 0.53 0.53 Water Usage: Minimum fee,includes up to 1,000 gallons of flow 6.60 7.90 Water meters up to and including 1" 6.60 7.90 Water meters over 1"and including 2" 17.6Z 18.15 Water meters over 2"and including 4" 24.60 25.33 Water meters over 4" 31.66 32.46 Water rate above 1,000 gallons 4.57 4.75 13 City of Golden Valley 2014 Proposed Master Fee Schedule-Exhibit A 2013 2014 Proposed Fee Fee Brookview Golf Gourse Rates Regulation Course 18 Hole Non-patron 35.00 35.00 18 Hole Patron 28.00 28.00 18 Hole Sr Patron 24.00 24.00 18 Hole Non-patron Senior Rate 28.00 28.00 18 Hole Non-patron League 35.00 35.00 18 Tournament 35.00 35.00 9 Hole Non-patron 19.00 19.00 9 Hole Patron 16.00 16.00 9 Hole Sr Patron 14.50 14.50 9 Hole Non-patron Senior 16.00 16.00 9 Hole Non-patron League 19.00 19.00 9 Hole Tournament 19.00 19.00 2nd Nine Non-patron 16.00 16.00 2nd Nine Patron 12.00 12.00 Sunrise/Sunset Rate 16.00 16.00 Twilight Non-patron 20.00 20.00 Twilight Patron 16.00 16.00 Junior Rate Patron 20.50/11.50 20.50/11.50 Junior Rate Non Patron 22.50/13.50 22.50/13.50 Par 3 Course 9 Hole Non-patron 12.50 12.50 9 Hole patron 9.00 9.00 9 Hole Sr Patron 8.00 8.00 9 Hole Non-patron Senior Rate 9.50 9.50 9 Hole League 12.50 12.50 9 Nole Tournament 12.50 12.50 9 Hole Junior Rate 8.00 8.00 9 Hole Junior Non-Patron Rate 9.50 9.50 2nd 9 Par 3 7.50 7.50 Patron Cards Resident Adult Patron 75.00/70.00 75.00/70.00 Non-resident Adult Patron 115.00/110.00 115.00/110.00 Resident Senior Patron(age 62+j 45.00/40.00 45.00/40.00 Non-resident Senior Patron(age 62+) 80.00/75.00 80.00/75.00 Resident Junior Patron(17 yrs&under) 35.00/30.00 35.00/30.00 Non-resident Junior(17 yrs&under) 40.00/35.00 40.00/35.00 Par 3 Patron Card 30.00 30.00 Driving Range Warm Up Bucket 3.00 3.00 Small Bucket 5.00 5.00 Large Bucket 7.00 7.00 10 Bucket Punch Pass 57.00 57.00 Large Patron Bucket 5.00 5.00 14 City of Golden Valley 2014 Proposed Master Fee Schedule-Exhibit A 2013 2014 Proposed Fee Fee Brookview Golf'Course Rates(cantinued) Cart Rates 18 Hole Power Cart 30.00 30.00 18 Hole Tournament Cart 30.00 30.00 18 Hole Patron Cart 24.00 24.00 9 Hole Tournament Cart 20.00 20.00 9 Hole Power Cart 20.00 20.00 9 Hole Single Rider Cart N/A N/A 9 Hole Par 3 Power Cart 15.00 15.00 9 Hole Par Patron Cart 16.00 16.00 Pull Cart/Regulation Course 5.00 5.00 Pull Cart/Par 3 Course 4.00 4.00 Trailer fee/Use of personal power cart 14.00/9.00 14.00/9.00 Club Rentals 18 Hole full rental-Regulation 20.00/30.00 20.00/30.00 9 Hole full rental-Regulation 10.00/15.00 10.00/15.00 9 hole Par 3 half rental 10.00 10.00 Locker Rental Season 20.00 20.00 Daily 1.00 1.00 Towel fee 2.00 2.00 Miscellaneous Fees USGA Handicap Service MGA Non-patron 40.00 40.00 Patron Annual 25.00 25.00 No Show Fee FULL FEE FULL FEE Lessons Adult Group 99.00 99.00 Junior Group 199.00 199.00 Lawn Bowling League Fee M-Th evenings(7 week league) 350.00 League Fee Sat/Sun a.m.(7 week league) 250.00 Single Court Rental 20.00/hour Private Rental of Four Courts 80.00/hour Private rental of Six Courts-exclusive use 120.00/hour Summer Kids Leagues 35.00 SeniorLeagues 35.00 Rental of Green/4 rinks for corporate golf outings 120.00/hour Banquet and Receptio�Rental 80.00-120.00/hr Drop-In Hourly Rate-resident&golf patron 15.00/court Drop-In Hourly Rate-non-resident 20.00/court Game Official For Private Rentals/Events 20.00/hour Game Equipme�t Use For Leagues&Rentals 0.00(Provided) 15 City of Golden Valley 2014 Proposed Master Fee Schedule-Exhibit A 2013 2014 Proposed Fee Fee Park&Reueation Fees �jA NomResldent fee of:55.00 is recommended ta��:be adtled to Youth,Adult and Senlor Activities�.)'.. .CenceOations would fncur a$5 adminstrative fee�. �. .. Youth Fees Baseball-Park 36.00 36.00 Basketball-Mites 42.00 42.00 Basketball-Youth 47.00 43.00-50.00 Bike Rangers 36.00 36.00 Catch,Kick&Throw 34.00 34.00 Chess Club 30.00 30.00 Drama Club(Summer) 61.00 62.00 Drama Club(Fall&Winter) 64.00 64.00 Explorers Hiking&Biking Club 34.00 34.00 Football-Flag 32.00 32.00 Football/Basketball/Soccer Skills 32.00 32.00 Hockey-Ice Skills Camp 52.00 52.00 Hockey-Rink Rat 46.00 46.00 Jewelry Making 33.00 33.00 Jump Rope 20.00 20.00 Kickball 31.00 31.00 Kids Club 45.00 46.00 Kids Korner 32.00 32.00 Pre-School Players 39.00 39.00 Pens, Pencils,Markers,&More 26.00 26.00 Pitch by Coach 36.00 36.00 Playgrounds Free 0.00-10.00 Preschool Playtime-per time 3.00 2.00 Preschool Playtime-10-time punch pass 25.00 15.00 Soccer-Fall 35.00 35.00 Soccer-Nerf 35.00 35.00 Summer Survivor 33.00 33.00 Tap&Ballet 40.00 41.00 T-Ball 36.00 36.00 Tennis-Full Day Camp 215.00 200.00-230.00 Tennis-Half Day Camp 185.00 180.00-200.00 Tennis-Teen Team League 195.00 195.00-200.00 - Volleyball-Sand 31.00 31.00 Adult/Senior Activities Ballroom Dance-Swing&Social 50.00 50.00 Basketball-Open Drop-in Fee 4.00 4.00 10-time Punch Pass 28.00 28.00 Belly Dancing 56.00-80.00 56.00-80.00 Bridge-Beginning 32.00 32.00 Bridge-Intermediate 32.00 32.00 Broomball League-Co-Rec Resident 445.00 450.00 Non-Resident 535.00 540.00 Line Dancing 45.00-60.00 45.00-60.00 Painting(6-time Punch Pass) 40.00 40.00 16 City of Golden Valley 2014 Proposed Master Fee Schedule-Exhibit A 2013 2014 Proposed Fee Fee Park&Recceation Fees�can�inueclj (A Non-Resident fee of$5.0615 recommended W-be adtled to Youth,Adult and Senior Adivities.):�. � �ance(latiory3 wQUld Intxi�a$5 atlmi�tstretiue fee�. � Adult/Senior Activities(continued) Soccer League-Co-Rec Resident 460.00 465.00 Non-Resident 610.00 615.00 Softball Leagues-Fall Resident 325.00 330.00 Non-Resident 445.00 450.00 Softball Leagues-Spring/Summer Doubleheader League-Resident 630.00 635.00 Doubleheader League-Non-Resident 830.00 835.00 Single Game League-Resident 455.00 515.00 Single Game League-Non-Resident 610.00 615.00 Tae Kwan Do 59.00 54.00-70.00 Tai Chi 45.00 40.00-60.00 Tennis Drills(8 lessons,per 4 week session) 159.00 150.00-250.00 Tennis League-Mixed Doubles 26.00 26.00 Tennis League-Singles 20.00 20.00 Volleyball-Open Drop-in Fee 4.00 4.00 10-time Punch Pass 28.00 28.00 Yoga&Pilates 55.00-95.00 55.00-95.00 Senior Programs Bowling Tourney 5.00 5.00 Coffee Talk 2.00 2.00 Craft/Art Classes 6.50-70.00 6.50-70.00 Defensive Driving(refreshments only) 1.00 1.00 Living Well and Wise 1.00-4.00 1.00-4.00 Lunch Events 9.00-20.00 9.00-20.00 Membership Dues 5.00-8.00 5.00-8.00 Money Matters 1.00-3.00 1.00-3.00 Remember When 1.00-2.00 1.00-2.00 Special Events 4.00-20.00 4.00-20.00 Trips-Extended 2-6 Days 250.00-1000.00 250.00-1200.00 Trips-One Day 8.00-95.00 8.00-95.00 17 City of Golden Valley 2014 Proposed Master Fee Schedule-Exhibit A 2013 2014 Proposed Fee Fee Park&'Recreation Fees f�antinuedy (A Non-Resident fQe of$5.00 is re�ommeraded tv be added to YouYh,Adult and SeMae AMivlties.): �Cancellations wquld lncur a$5 adminstrative fee. Other Park&Recreation Fees Small Park Shelter Resident(up to 50 people) 90.00 95.00 Non-resident 105.00 110.00 Large Park Shelter Resident(up to 100 people) 105.00 125.00 Non-resident 125.00 145.00 Beer/Wine Permit(only with Picnic Shelter rental) 25.00 25.00 Food Truck per day-3 day maximum 40.00 Brookview Community Center Resident(over 75 people; 12 hours) 560.00 560.00 Non-resident(over 75 people;12 hours) 645.00 645.00 Resident(up to 75 people;5 hours max) 25 per hour 25 per hour Non-resident(up to 75 people;5 hours max) 35 per hour 35 per hour Private Industry or Commercial Use-Resident/Non-Resident 55-65 per hr 55-65 per hr Non-Profit/Community Organization-Resident/Non-Resident 25-35 per hour 25-35 per hour Davis Community Center Gym 25 per hour Tennis Court Tournament-per day/per court 35.00 40.00 Court/hr/wkday 5.00 6.00 Picnic Kit 15.00 15.00 Athletic Field Per hour 35.00 40.00 W/Lights per hour 50.00 55.00 Prep per field(extra drag) 35.00 Chalking per field 6.00 General Park Usage-Non-Brookview per hour 35.00 35.00 Commercial Use of Park per hour 100.00 100.00-125.00 Park Building per hour 40.00 Hockey Rink per hour 35.00 Youth Athletic Association per player Maintenance Fee-Resident per player 6.00 6.00 Maintenance Fee-Non-Resident per player 11.00 11.00 Invitational Tournament per field per day 50.00 50.00 18 ���� �� `;'„ Pianning Department 763-593-8095 i 763-593-8109(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting December 3, 2013 Agenda Item 3. H. Approval of Use of Affordable Housing Incentive Fund (AHIF) Loan for Property Located at 2913 Orchard Avenue North Prepared By Mark Grimes, Community Development Director Summary In July 2013 the City Council approved a resolution request by John Everett of Community Involvement Programs regarding the use of Hennepin County Environmental Response Funds regarding a rehabilitation project they are doing with Hennepin County MHFA funds for the property located at 2913 Orchard Avenue North. The Hennepin Affordable Housing Incentive Fund has also awarded funds for the rehabilitation of this property and is asking for a separate resolution of support. Attachments • Resolution Approving Use of the Hennepin County's Affordable Housing Incentive Fund for the Property Located at 2913 Orchard Avenue North (1 page) Recommended Action Motion to adopt Resolution Approving Use of the Hennepin County's Affordable Housing Incentive Fund for Property Located at 2913 Orchard Avenue North. Resolution 13-106 December 3, 2013 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION APPROVING USE OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY'S AFFORDABLE HOUSING INCENTIVE FUND FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2913 ORCHARD AVENUE NORTH WHEREAS, the Hennepin County Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HCHRA) in Resolution No. 12-HCHRA-0015 has approved the use of a $97,200 Affordable Housing Incentive Fund (AHIF) loan for the 2913 Orchard Avenue North project, contingent upon the City's consent to the HCHRA's participation in the project; and WHEREAS, the 2913 Orchard Avenue North project will increase/preserve the supply of affordable housing in the City of Golden Valley by providing/preserving three units of affordable housing; and WHEREAS, the loan from the HCHRA will complete the financing required for the project to go forward. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Golden Valley, that the participation of the Hennepin County Housing and Redevelopment Authority in the project is hereby approved. Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: Susan M. Virnig, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by the City Clerk. cit� c�� Planning Department 763-593-8095/763-593-8109(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting December 3, 2013 Agenda Item 3. I. Authorization to Sign Amended PUD Permit- Room & Board PUD No. 79, Amendment No. 4 Prepared By Mark Grimes, Community Development Director Summary At the November 6, 2013 City Council meeting,the Council held a public hearing on the Final PUD plan for Room & Board. After the hearing the Council approved the Final plan. The PUD permit has now been prepared for consideration. City staff has reviewed the document and finds it to be consistent with the approved Final PUD plan and the requirements of City Code. Attachments Underlined/Overstruck PUD Permit- Room & Board PUD No. 79, Amendment#4 (3 pages) Recommended Action Motion to authorize the Mayor and City Manager to sign the amended PUD Permit for Room & Board PUD No. 79, Amendment No. 4. Originai City Council Approval: September 1, 1998 Amendment 1 City Council Approval: January 19, 1999 Amendment 2 Cit,y, Council Approval: May 18, 2004 Amendment 3 City Council Approval: February 21, 2006 Amendment 4 City Council Approval: November 6, 2013 City of Golden Valley, Minnesota Use Permit for Amendment 4 Planned Unit Development Project Name: Room and Board PUD No. 79 Amendment No. 4 DI Ill �mon�Jmc� Address: 4600 Olson Memorial Hiqhway, Golden Vallev, Minnesota Legal Description: Lot 1 Block 1�9�St� Room & Board 2nd Addition PUD No. 79 Applicant: Fortier & Associates Inc. Address: 1804 Sprinq Valley Circle, Golden Valley, Minnesota Owner: 600 Olson Memorial Hwy LLC Address: 4600 Olson Memorial Hiqhway Golden Valley, Minnesota Zoning District` Industrial Permitted Uses: Mixed Use: Office Warehouse and Outlet Sales. Continuing use of approved PUD uses. Components: A. Land Use Component: 1. All requirements of the oriqinal PUD Permit and for Amendment Nos. 1, 2 and 3 to PUD No. 79 shall remain in full force except as noted in these recommendations. 2. The master plan for the Room and Board campus prepared by Fortier and Associates and dated 9/24/03 shall become a part of this approval. (This master plan replaces the master plan approved by Amendment No. 1.) This includes the designation of"proof of parking" areas. At any time City staff determines that the existing parking is not adequate to meet the needs of the on-site uses, the Chief of Fire and Inspections shall order any or all of the "proof of parking" spaces be constructed in a timely manner. 3. . , . , . , . , ��The amount of office space and outlet store space shall only change with an amendment to the PUD. Tho m � nr! r �mm nc• frnm I (llivor DC (�i�v Gn'vir�oor 4n nA�rlr 4�„�er�-a,-�Tes�Te-r�at�e,-.�-�,�e#--� , , , , • . , � • 6. Outlet retail sales shall be limited to the 46�9 outlet sales building shown on the site plan and can occur only on Saturday and Sunday. The sales shall be limited to overstock and "scratch and denY' items from Room and Board stores. ��e , • 7. The plans prepared bv Fortier & Associates, Inc. dated September 13, 2013 submitted with the application shall become a part of this approval. . , ��ryi.ne�,��_��or DC' �� �A�rlr (�rimoc� fliron4�r nf Dl�nr�inn onrl I1c�iclnr+mon� L�n9rr-r c ,n—�cv �v-rrcv� rn-rcr-vc�.....p,........ � • C. Subdivision Component: 1. The plat for this subdivision is Room and Board 2"d Addition PUD No. 79. A revised plat is not required for this �+ae� PUD Amendment. D. Services and Facilities Component: 1. The PUD shall meet all requirements and recommendations of the City Building Inspector and City Fire Marshal. The memo and comments from ��' °^�'°r�^^, �;+., Deputy Fire Chief John Crelly to Mark Grimes, � no„o�„�,.,,o„+ Communitv Development Director, dated , , 96 July 26, 2013 shall become a part of this approval. 2. The findings and recommendations of City Engineer, Jeff Oliver, PE, �c r� °�;��I�e . , , to Mark Grimes, Communitv Development Director, dated August 7, 2013, shall become a part of this approval. 3. All siqns on the property must meet the requirements of the City's Siqn Code. It is hereby understood and agreed that this Use Permit is a part of the City Council approvals granted on September 1, 1998, January 19, 1999, May 18, 2004, a� February 21, 2006 and November 6, 2013 relative to Planned Unit Development#79. Room and Board Witness: By: Title: Date: City of Golden Valley Witness: By: Shepard M. Harris, Its Mayor Date: Witness: By: Thomas D. Burt, Its City Manager Date: Warning: This permit does not exempt you from all other City Code provisions, regulations and ordinances. W'Y V > w./� t� t Y' i� Planning Department 763-593-8095/763-593-8109(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting December 3, 2013 Agenda Item 3. J. Approval of Conditional Extension for Filing of Plat and Submitting Final PUD Plan Application - PUD#107-The Towers at West End -Southwest Quadrant of I-394 and Highway 100- Duke Realty, Applicant Prepared By Mark Grimes, Director of Planning and Development Jeannine Clancy, Director of Public Works Summary At the March 3, 2009 City Council meeting, the Council approved the Preliminary PUD Plan and Preliminary Plat for The Towers at West End PUD No. 107. The Council has approved nine 180- day extensions since the original Preliminary PUD approval. The Preliminary PUD Plan and Preliminary Plat provide for the construction of a 4,000+space parking deck attached to several office buildings that are located in St. Louis Park. Due to market conditions, Duke is requesting an extension for the filing of their applications for the Final PUD plan and the Final Plat. At this time, staff recommends that the extension of the PUD approval be a conditional 180 days. Staff will monitor the efforts by MCES and Duke to reach a conclusion on the permanent location of the lift station, the forcemain alignment, and all other appurtenances needed for the construction of the 1-GV-461 forcemain within the vicinity of the Duke property. All temporary and permanent easements shall be identified, and all land shall be transferred in connection with the project. Duke shall demonstrate to the City of Golden Valley its good faith efforts to act in accordance with the requirements of the PUD. Staff will report the status of Duke's progress with the MCES in 60 days (August 31, 2013). If adequate progress is being made to meet the terms of the PUD, the Council may extend the PUD for an additional term not to exceed 120 days (December 29, 2013). If adequate progress is not being made to meet the terms of the PUD, the Council may revoke any further extension of the PUD preliminary approval beyond the first approximate 60 days. Attachments • Location Map (1 page) • Letter from Duke Realty requesting an extension dated November 11, 2013 (1 page) Recommended Action Motion to approve an extension for submittal of the Final PUD Plan application and the Final Plat for The Towers at West End, PUD No. 107 until June 1, 2014, subject to the following conditions: 1. Duke shall submit cash deposits as requested by the City to cover legal and engineering costs incurred by the City for consideration of the Preliminary Plan. 2. Duke will be financially responsible for road construction under TH 100 and intersection improvements on the east side of TH 100 and traffic calming along the frontage road east of TH 100, to occur at the time building permits are applied for by Duke. 3. Duke shall cooperate with the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) in the construction of the 1-GV-461 Reliever project. The Reliever project is required to be constructed by MCES to increase sanitary sewer capacity to serve Duke's West End development and other future development in certain parts of Golden Valley and St. Louis Park. MCES and Duke to reach a conclusion on the permanent location of the lift station,the force main alignment, and all other appurtenances needed for the construction of the 1-GV- 461 force main within the vicinity of the Duke property. All temporary and permanent easements shall be identified, and all land shall be transferred in connection with the project. If the City or MCES determines that there has not been adequate cooperation from Duke, the City retains the right to place additional conditions on future extensions to the Preliminary PUD Plan or the Final PUD Plan. 4. Duke shall demonstrate to the City of Golden Valley its good faith efforts to act in accordance with the requirements of the PUD. Staff will report the status of Duke's progress with the MCES in 60 days. If adequate progress is being made to meet the terms of the PUD, the Council may extend the PUD for an additional term not to exceed 120 days. If adequate progress is not being made to meet the terms of the PUD, the Council may revoke any further extension of the PUD preliminary approval beyond the first approximate 60 days. If Council finds that adequate progress is being made to meet the terms of the PUD,the Council may permit the extension of the PUD preliminary approval to continue for the remaining approximate 120 days. aso u 4coi�nun�EVa I ��, V �, � ' ��7 uo iso � .� r`TT i _ . _._. � . . � aa� s�e '� I ,�x� �r � �ia3i� '52Z1.52ii52#115��1� 5k1i SD3i 3i5 4'S4[I ��dS10:q� C �G19 � '�� 4t1D ' �- ., � O. r- � ai� snia `�+ . � '� �, yVESty1P�;pn.:� °:aai aub � �t�F�cit��`R� 5(IY 5Q9 Si7 541 �1 y7t . �X.� `� 4�7 ADB � 4U5 4$424521A51 C� dl1D 406 �� i0f -��•�,,1���� 4Y0 �55 50Y3 T"— `_. 5b5 ' TtIFtMPIKE Rt1 ,'�t� ., � 433 4i6 e�a � di7 �� , , ,� , � �. � soi esia �s a� ;, sis su �� s€�° sfls sie sa� a�� . .e � sn� sos F as��s2st. , � � ' - ... o � _���� aza �ia � �s,i soo� w�, �, � sss sss � �is _ ; sir so� iy s�' _ $ `�, �' �i � � asz� esusso� ' �� sis, • � �ns � - _. .... , �r `. 549 di4 � �.•4632 62163)'fi�fi2S1625 _�� < , '� v, ! � � � bA2 ` � $2i 609 "� � � ^� 617 6Z3 . �, : . COIDttF�t PWld ' ,;'t72a A70D �� . - y�,.� s ; L_.' I �roq � ,rtotth ryrol park '� �i� �DSa341 stao sas4 szoo CtRCIE DPIS 3Yraw6 I 5110-51d6;spliq ; 4633 g��d ;" ( ; .L...J__._� ° CIRCLE UNS ,r �} aGi6 �' � 8� � 401 r........7._.... 4�1i B10 5301$Z31522i r,�yi, �i r �u . . 5�d1lREA �JS3R 4GIt6 $15 3�3��,Sx01 SY01 °,.' ,. 1. 824 . ; . _ ,_. � a{508 � � ���. ` �� �• � 152t1 , r , „ ..... ,.. �8 �;��� s�ou i , aaof ���a4ia, ,�� ; - � 354i _ �� !1"6i�L��PO/td � � � � � �. � � � �; 2s ��» RE toop�Pa►d �n asss - - � . � 45t15 � ��,, ��>; . _ � R��. . ��HWY1�Q S Ti71N9 X39�1 r�s�+wria�s ra vua�sa _.__ �v��ya res sa�wrxno s �`' IN7ERSTATE 394 . _ ': : � _ _.. .. . _ _. ...394 NUY E.t'�.:: ..., _ _ . ... . . _ _ . . E8 1394 TO NS!i'MIYiflD S 56 HWY3tYU S TCI EB I3+�f4 ; �'r�sr�r��sa 4o WA�'YATA�Lyp City of St. Louis Park � �,.��� � 444D ,44i0 :�{flp�;��4314 � ' q� � �l 1325 i � , � � vS . .. '� -� .... $t �J r�.--- . r f,, �1y �1�. 132li �� l34S +145fl �"YROL CRST 1315 5075 i q" i� Y300 �+ �___..• �--. /` /.�'` a� . cp`�,. ' i�is "`' ,arES �szas2s��� z3za ''� ' ,�' ,�CS�� � ieo� i�aw i4ss 4A35 i Oi f�r' f�' , 'S1� , �1435`4 1 i 1 i 4 i 5 1420 4 5 2 b'4 5 0 1 1 4 9 3 9 A�`� � Su bjec t Prope r ties fu�,;,j � ` lias`s �� i�zs ��°p� / "��`,' �� 5,�iasa :ais _ � j- , laao j��[���a+a'iu ,�a32s �--_ �, f ,� �i � 1435 45L5 � i3s5� 1423 �r . f45tl �. iAAS I450 �Rry.� �� y, � � � ' yg(� ... �.. � �ta36 '��-- f{ +4" Q'.i''� ' 1510 �,i4d5 iqq . ,�� i431 l f f��.,� ; ��� � y 15b5 1510 �;�� i:'S10 �� 4�17�1�� �I4�0 � /'/,�� '�i,�^� qq y1 iSiS 1520 �i525 1629 �i5i5 1� r�,y�g, 43�3 431i� � l�,f y� ' � +�r +C M ....__ L430 4$2Yl4ffi14q,i�1 _ , 4310': ,' f� py. � ,�' 1525 Y.5� �153b 153D Y519 f! � O ' 4 � � � � 4410" d�2Y. .. .� ; b- 4 1535 1S�! �iS4�*. 35AO i535 �1(��U15.AVE 4 r'`f q�j ' ; : �.' �• 1545 4$OG ; 15i9 1554 ; 463G I � � 'r �»�__ Z' ,G�r �S 453'�452545i5 A435A4Z54415 4335432549i5 � �y, Mld5 4345 � ���-��A�.�n��sus c�r,;.ix:c!:c.�:,cr��as c 5tr�3 �1►`i D u ke �600 Utica Avenue South Suite 250 REALTY Minneapolis,MN 55416 952.543.2900 www.dukerealty.com November 11, 2013 Ms. Lisa Wittman City of Golden Valley 7800 Golden Valley Road Golden Valley, MN 55427 Re: Towers at West End PUD Application Extension Dear Ms. Wittman: Please find enclosed Duke Realty's Check No. 8044438, in the amount of $150.00, for the extension to submit our final PUD application for the Towers at West End project. If you have any additional questions or comments, please contact me at 952-543-2970. Regards, DUKE REALTY CORPORATION ,.! � n p %C� �,'�JC��.:� t�w�� Gary Gleason Vice President, Construction enclosure c: Pat Mascia, Duke Realty File �Z��1 D� ; Public Works Departrnent 763-593-8030/763-593-3988{fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting December 3, 2013 Agenda Item 3. K. Authorize Amendments to Agreements for Preparation of Feasibility Study for 2015 Bassett Creek Main Stem Restoration Project a.Amendment to Cooperative Agreement between City of Golden Valley and Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission b. Revised Professional Services Agreement with WSB &Associates, Inc. Prepared By Jeannine Clancy, Director of Public Works Jeff Oliver, PE, City Engineer Joe Fox, EIT, Water Resources Engineer Summary The Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission (BCWMC) has determined that it is in the best interest of its member communities and the BCWMC to stabilize a portion of Bassett Creek in Golden Valley in 2015 as part of its Capital Improvement Program. The stabilization and restoration will begin at Rhode Island Avenue,just north of 10th Avenue, and extend 9,500 feet north to Duluth Street. The City Council approved agreements with the BCWMC and WSB & Associates (WSB), the City's consulting engineer for the project, on June 4, 2013. Since the approval of the original agreements, the BCWMC and the Public Works Department have determined that it is necessary to modify the original work plan for the project. The changes include a higher level of alternatives analysis and project design in the feasibility report, and to include public participation prior to the BCWMC consideration of the report. Therefore, the recommendation included to the BCWMC will include public input on the advantages and disadvantages of each of the streambank stabilization methods being considered. The original proposal from WSB was dated May 8, 2013 and included an estimated cost of up to $54,100. The amended work plan based upon the above discussion is dated October 31, 2013 and includes an estimated cost not to exceed $62,000. The BCWMC is responsible for 100%of the additional costs. The original BCWMC Cooperative Agreement has been modified to reflect the change of scope including the not to exceed cost. This agreement was approved by the BCWMC at its November 20, 2013 meeting. Attachments • Location map (1 page) • Cooperative Agreement between the Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission and the City of Golden Valley(2 pages) � Revised Work Plan to Provide Professional Engineering Services for 2015 Bassett Creek Main Stem Restoration Project from WSB &Associates, dated October 31, 2013 (6 pages) Recommended Action 1. Motion authorizing the Amendment to Cooperative Agreement for the 2015 Bassett Creek Main Stem Restoration Project (BC-25) between the Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission and the City of Golden Valley. 2. Motion authorizing the agreement between WSB &Associates, Inc. and the City of Golden Valley for professional engineering services for an amount not to exceed $62,000. r/ � '^��e�-..�, � .�.--�- -�—'`� r r--<''x,� a� _,_."_"'-,_ _...I� �3�t (� �'�`��"�� I �'; ti� $um. I �� � � `�C � ��� �� x `� � I� xI _ _.------- I ```�`' � �\ \� � �, `«, � � '� � �j�.__ .�; , , o — �� 00 � . �`i L N� � J ._-_ :I ��.. � - I .-, j i - - ------�' � ' ' , _.— N eA�/6UBZ .` � �� � I � ' � � � � � � - _— _�L_�. �� � � ���� o #�� .�C 0 Z—_-- _ o - � •— �� � I ,,'' ' i v o - ' N �,,, N�p se�Bnoa 1 � N _ y+ N � �� ---__ _ ---- d ,` Y _�� .-� % � � � ` .� �'- ---,« - �' � ; -- d � � O O - - �------- C w � {� •a+ �` _ . _ O � a � � � � O N � O v� . , .°d � _ l � m � -_--J---�,\_ � _j � '�G � .� , �i . ._ .._..._ ...�J...� + ' : a� � d . __f ! o� � L l '� � ��� ` ..._.�.._ . . . � i , i r � ; ' � � ; , � ;' �+ I _. .. _ _...__ . _ � o ++ a c� d ' .`\\ � :ti - ...r_� -' -_... �_ � ,�/� 1�� � -- - _ -- .-_--.__�____ -- -C --�.--..--- -__--. -- m _ _____ . T � � ___---�--- _____________ . __..___ _ _ _ _ � _ __ _ _ .____ _� + ' 1 � Rhode Island Ve p . �---!--- N ya -- __ _ _ � _______.. �i I ___1_ [_ _____ _ _ _?___ _ � ------ - - 1 ------_ . ` I � --� I __.--�_----- � � � ' N any e�J;euuiM � i , J ; ; � ---i . _ __-- _. ,.1. � ------ ----- O ---,.. ..�._. .__ � _ __\ '`^ '�`^ '..� � L � � i -�...,_.. ___..�_.----i i i � � .`-- ��_ , ♦ O ; .� � t V ' I f� � 1 � -" 7 N ';'r -+.-__� r t _._{_ �.�--'� `----_..._._ - o � N '�� 'i' _ ' � , � ; a —_-- N �/ N ny ui uo�siM � �" 1 y � � , �r _ ...- ,, , � 1 � r � __. ; � . , , , , . � .--_____ ,I ; � ; ; ; .�-. , ._ �._._ __ , z ( ( I -_ - _ __'_._.�-..�,:� i � ;� . - , ; ' Q �};�', � i ,�. ,--- o ;'���: AMENDMENT TO COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT FOR PREPARATION OF A FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR MAIN STEM CHA.NNEL RESTURATIUN PROJECT 2415CR k This amendment is made as of the Zo�aay of �to Ye+��ae�, 2013, by and betuveen Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission, a joint powers watershed management organization(hereinafter the"Comrnission"),and the city of Golden Valley,a Minnesota municipal corporation(hereinafter the"City"). WITNESSETH: WHF.REAS,the Commission and the City entered into an agreement dated � �lY 2013, entitled "Cooperative Agreement for Preparation of a Feasibility Report for Main Stem Channel Restoration Project 2015-CR"{hereinafter the"Cooperative Agreement");and WHEREAS,the parties wish to amend the Cooperative Agreement as hereinafter provided. NOW, THEREF�RE, on the basis of the premises and rnutual covenants hereinafter set forth,the parties agree that the Cooperative Agreernent is amended as fotlows: 1. Paragraph 2 of the Cooperative Agreernent is amended to read as follows: "The City will prepare a feasibility report for the Project (the "Report"} in accardance with the proposal of WSB & Associates dated October 31, 2Q13, attached as Attachment One. 2. Paragraph 3 of the Cooperative Agreement is amended to read as follows: "The Commission will reimburse up to$62,000 of the cost of preparing the Repart." 3. The proposal af WSB dated October 31, 2013 attached to this amendment as Attachment One, is substituted for the Attachment One attached to the Cooperative Agreernent. 4. Except as explicitly amended herein,the Cooperative Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS VJHEREOF,the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized afficers on behalf of the parties as of the day and date first above written. BASSETT CREEK WATERSHED MANAGEMENT COMMISSIt�N By: lts Chair And by: Its ecretary � a3saos��snzss-ar CITY UF GOLDEN VALLEY By: Its Mayor And by: Its Manager 2 435005v1 BA295-41 � ��17 ��� �t7�117��fdJ?C�•�?I�)?l7tt7�•£'tiV1fOC7t37�Clfc��°Ct�/75�fUCf1C�t1 701 Xenia Avenue South cK ri.ssr�itrtr.s,Ifrc. Suite 300 Minneapolis,MN 55416 Tel: 763-541-4800 Fax: 763-541-1700 October 31, 2013 Mr. Jeff Oliver City of Golden Valley 7800 Golden Valley Road Golden Valley, MN 55427 Re: Revised Work Plan to Provide Professional Engineering Services for the 2015 Bassett Creek Main Stem Restoration Project City of Golden Valley, MN Dear Mr. Oliver: As requested by the Bassett Creek Watershed Commission (BCWMC),this work plan for the 2015 Bassett Creek Main Stem Restoration Feasibility Study has been revised from the original work plan dated May 8, 2013. (The revised tasks are identified with an asterisk(*)) This work plan is associated with providing engineering services required for the development of a feasibility study for the 2015 Bassett Creek Main Stream Restoration Project, Subreach 2 of Reach 1. As part of the revised work plan,this feasibility study will provide greater detail than previous studies by including a preliminary plan with alternatives for stream restoration techniques for permitting purposes and for public input. This subreach of Bassett Creek Based is located within the City of Golden Valley and begins at Rhode Island Avenue,just north of lOth Street, and extends about 9,500 feet north to Duluth Street. The tasks to complete the feasibility study include the following: Task 1: Gather Background Information* As part of this task, a project kickoff ineeting will be held and background information related to the project will be obtained from various sources in order to best describe the project. These sources will include information from previously constructed projects, Barr Engineering, staff members from the City of Golden Valley, GIS and record drawings from Golden Valley, and other background information that may be made available as the project develops. A preliminary inspection of the channel will provide documentation of the eroded sections of the creek, define tree removals, identify potential access routes and staging areas, and identify any infrastructure repairs that may be required. Information regarding property boundaries, wetlands, and existing easements that are dedicated over the area will also be collected. The estimated cost to complete this task: $9,800 St Cloud• Minneapolis•St.Paul Equai Opportunity Employer wsbeng.com K:\02032-060WdMa�DoeaROl4_Prop\LTR Prop1014BC ResrolU31/3.Joc Mr. Jeff Oliver October 31, 2013 Page 2 Task 2: Complete Review and Analysis of Background Information As part of this task, the background information collected as part of Task 1, will be reviewed and analyzed to prioritize the eroded sections of the creek and to evaluate a wide variety of stabilization practices to facilitate the restoration of the creek. In addition to this analysis,tree removals will be quantified, access routes and staging areas will be further defined, and recommendations will be suggested for any infrastructure repairs identified along the subreach, for the purpose of further refining the feasibility study. The estimated cost to complete this task: $4,500 Task 3: Complete Wetland Delineation and Survey As part of this task, we will perform a Level 1 wetland delineation (completed in-office with field verification)to approximate wetland boundaries and types within a specific review area. Available water and wetland resource related information will be reviewed for an evaluation of the conditions that may be present within the project corridor and will be field verified. Permitting for wetland impacts associated with the project will be associated with the final design of the project. In the case where additional wetland delineation work will be required by a permitting agency,the cost to complete the additional wetland delineation will be included as part of this task. Therefore,the cost for this task is provided as a range. The estimated range of costs to complete this task: $4,000-$9,500 Task 4: Complete Cultaral Resource Survey As part of this task, we will complete a cultural resource survey of the reach to determine if there are historical artifacts or the likelihood of encountering any historical artifacts during restoration activities. Once completed,the information gathered will be discussed with the permitting agency representatives to obtain general concurrence on the survey and will to be taken into consideration as part of any future project design. Cultural Resource Permitting for the project will be associated with the final design of the project. The estimated cost to complete this task: $6,200 Task 5: Complete Environmental Review As part of this task, we will perform an Environmental Regulatory Review to obtain information for evaluating the presence of contamination that could be encountered during restoration activities. Sites within 200 feet from the creek centerline will be searched to evaluate for potential soil and/or groundwater contamination risk along the project area. Environmental permitting will be associated with the final design of the project. In the case where additional environmental assessment, completion of a Phase I, is required by a permitting agency, the cost K\02032-060\Admin\Docs\2014_Prop\LTR_Prop2014BC_Rasto 103113.doc Mr. Jeff Oliver October 31, 2013 Page 3 to complete the additional environmental assessment will be included as part of this task. Therefore, the cost for this task is provided as a range. The estimated range of costs to complete this task: $1,200-$4,500 Task 6: Prepare Preliminary Plan and Costs* As part of this revised task, a preliminary plan will be developed and the maintenance areas will be prioritized and selected.Two restoration techniques will be provided and will be assessed for long term stability and cost effectiveness. These restoration techniques will include bioengineering as well as more engineered restoration techniques in areas where significant tree removals would be required when using bioengineering practices. Far each of these maintenance areas, a preliminary estimate of cost will be prepared, along with a rough estimate of the benefits of each of these improvements in regard to their ability to stabilize the channel. The estimated cost to complete this task: $10,500 Task 7: Review Preliminary Plan with Stake Holders* As part of this revised task, we anticipate holding several meetings to which we would invite City staff, representatives from the BCWMC, Corps of Engineers, DNR, and SHPO. In addition, we anticipate holding a public meeting with the homeowners in the project area to review the potential tree removals, the proposed restoration techniques, and to obtain feedback on the alternatives. The estimated cost to complete this task: $4,800 � Task 8: Select Most Cost-Effective Feasible Alternative/Refine Design* The most cost-effective feasible alternative that appears to receive the most stakeholder support will be further developed and refined. A more accurate estimate of construction cost and benefits will be developed. The estimated cost to complete this task: $3,200 Task 9: Prepare Feasibility Report* As part of this task, a feasibility report will be prepared having the following format: l. Executive Summary 1.1. Reach Background 1.2. General Project Description and Estimated Cost 1.3. Recommendations K:\02032-0(0\Admin\Docs\2014_Prop\LTR_Prop2014BC_Resto 103113.doc Mr. Jeff Oliver October 31, 2013 Page 4 2. Background and Objectives 2.1. Goals and Objectives 2.2. Background 2.2.1. Reach Description 2.2.2. Past Documents and Activities Addressing this Reach 3. Site Characteristics 3.1. Bassett Creek Watershed 3.2. Stream Characteristics 3.3. Site Access 3.4. Wetlands 3.5. Cultural and Historical Resources 3.6. Phase I Environmental Assessment 4. PotentialImprovements 4.1. Description of Potential Improvements 4.2. Project Impacts 4.2.1. Easement/Right of Entry Acquisition 4.2.2. Permits Required for Project 4.2.3. Other Project Impacts 4.3. Opinion of Cost 4.4. Funding Sources 4.5. Project Schedule Tables • BCWMC Channel Projects • Potential Stabilization Measures at Each Site • Potential Permit Requirements by Work Site • Site Locations, Potential Stream Stabilization Practices, and Overall Option of Cost for Proj ect Figures • Location Map • Stream Stabilization Sites • Stream Stabilization Options Appendices a) Preliminary Plan Set with Stream Restoration Alternatives b) Site Photos c) Wetland Delineation Report d) Cultural and Historical Resource Report e) Phase I Environmental Assessment fl City Erosion Inventory The estimated cost to complete this task: $5,500 K:\02032-OGO\Admin\Docs\2014_Prop\LTR_Prop20146C_Resto 103113,doc Mr. Jeff Oliver October 31, 2013 Page 5 Task 10: Review Report with City Staff and BCWMC As part of this task,the findings contained in the final feasibility report will be reviewed and presented to City staff, BCWMC, and other interested parties. Should the City and BCWMC wish to proceed with the project, we will provide information and recommendations on the best approach to move forward with implementation of the project. The estimated cost to complete this task: $1,500 Task ll: Submit Project Plans to Permitting Agencies As part of this task, permit applications will be prepared and submitted to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for a 404 Permit and Section 401 Certification from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. Permits will also be prepared and submitted to the LGU in compliance with Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act, and a permit application will be prepared and submitted to the DNR for a Public Waters Work Permit.A NPDES Storm Water Pollution Prevention Permit application will also be submitted for the project that will address managing erosion during construction. The estimated cost to complete this task: $2,000 Cost for Study/Feasibility Report We estimate the revised cost to complete Tasks 1- 11 to range from$53,200 to $62,000. Unless unforeseen issues are identified that are outside the scope of work described above,this work should be able to be completed within nine months of the date we receive notice to proceed. If you are in agreement with the terms as outlined above, please sign where indicated below and return one copy to our office. Sincerely, WSB&Associates,Inc. w. .� �� E � t .��z �....� �.:- �w ��� � .. ,..... Pete Willenbring, PE Project ManagerNice President ef K:\62032-0C,0\Adrttin\Docs\2014_Prop\LTR_Prop2014BC_Resto 103113.doc Mr. Jeff Oliver October 31, 2013 � Page 6 ACCEPTED BY: Thomas D. Burt, City Manager Date City of Golden Valley Shepard M. Harris, Mayor Date City of Golden Valley cc: Todd Hubmer, WSB and Associates, Inc. K:\02032-060\Admin\Docs\2014_Prop\LTR_Prop2014BC_Resto 103113.doc ���� �� ,; Finance Department 763-593-8013/763-593-8109(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting December 3, 2013 Agenda Item 4. A. Public Hearing-Adoption of 2013 Property Tax Levy Payable 2014 and 2014-2015 General Fund Budget Prepared By Sue Virnig, Finance Director Summary At this meeting, City Council will consider the resolution adopting the 2013 property tax levy payable in 2014 and the 2014 General Fund Budget. The 2015 budget is for future planning purposes and is approved "in concept" only. Staff will present an overview of the 2014-2015 budget process. The 2014-2015 Proposed General Fund Budget is located on the City website at http://www.�oldenvallevmn.�ov/bud�et/index.php Attachments Resolution Adopting the 2013 Property Tax Levies for Taxes Payable 2014 (1 page) Resolution Adopting the 2014 Budget of the General Fund Budget (2 pages) 2014-2015 Proposed General Fund Budget (distributed previously) Recommended Action Motion to adopt Resolution Adopting the 2013 Property Tax Levies for Taxes Payable 2014. Motion to adopt Resolution Adopting the 2014 Budget of the General Fund Budget. Resolution 13-107 December 3, 2013 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE 2013 PROPERTY TAX LEVIES FOR TAXES PAYABLE 2014 WHEREAS, the City Council has approved for the fiscal year commencing January 1, 2014; and WHEREAS, the proposed budgets require monies to be raised from property taxes on taxable property in the City of Golden Valley; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council, that the following sums of money be raised by property tax on taxable property in the City of Golden Valley for taxes payable in 2014 as set out in the 2014-2015 adopted City budgets are hereby levied; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Golden Valley, Minnesota, that the 2014 General Fund Budget are hereby given final approval. PURPOSE TAX LEVY General Fund $12,532,160 SPECIAL LEVIES: Tax Abatement Levy 300,000 Certificate of Indebtedness 761,919 Bonded Indebtedness 3,841,495 TOTAL LEVIES $17.435.574 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council declares its intent to take all necessary actions legally permissible to the submission and approval of the City's budget and property tax levies both proposed and final. Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: Susan M. Virnig, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by the City Clerk. Resolution 13-108 December 3, 2013 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE 2014 BUDGET OF THE GENERAL FUND BUDGET WHEREAS, in 2013, the staff presented a biennial budget cycle with a proposed 2014 current budget year and a 2015 "in concept" budget proposal; and WHEREAS, this proposed 2014 operating budget resolution and the accompanying proposed tax levies contained in Resolution 13-107 are submitted by the City in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and other applicable laws in effect on this date; and BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Golden Valley, Minnesota, that the 2014 General Fund Budget are hereby given final approval. DIVISION DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 001 Council $294,840 003 City Manager 762,980 004 Transfers Out 294,710 005 Administrative Services 1,676,280 006 Legal Services 135,000 007 Risk Management 300,000 011 Building Operations 556,990 016 Community Development 997,740 022 Police 5,202,175 023 Fire 1,200,190 035 Public Works Administration 334,315 036 Engineering 691,880 037 Streets 1,429,410 065 Community Centers 74,100 066 Park and Recreation Administration 679,345 067 Park Maintenance 1051,490 068 Park and Recreation Programs 502,830 TOTAL 2014 BUDGET $16�184.275 Resolution 13-108 - Continued December 3, 2013 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council that the sources of financing the sums appropriated shall be: DESCRIPTION AMOUNT Ad Valorem Taxes $12,358,005 Licenses 210,785 Permits 725,000 Federal Grants 31,205 State Grants 255,390 Charges for Services 1,856,690 Fines and Forfeitures 320,000 Interest on Investments 100,000 Miscellaneous Revenue 227,200 Transfers In 100,000 TOTAL 2014 BUDGET $16,184,275 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council declares its intent to take all necessary actions legally permissible to the submission and approval of the City's budget and property tax levies both proposed and final. Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: Susan M. Virnig, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by the City Clerk. L+�&� i.'f gari'*1. . i./ iq�� � Public Works Department 753-593-8030/763-593-3988{fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting December 3, 2013 Agenda Item 4. B. Continued Public Hearing to Vacate Portions of Public Alley and Easements in the Plats of Spring Green South and Registered Land Survey No. 106 (The Three.Nine.Four Apartments) Prepared By Jeannine Clancy, Director of Public Works Eric Eckman, Public Works Specialist Summary Consistent with City Code, the proposed final plat for the Globus Golden Valley Addition P.U.D. No. 112 (The Three.Nine.Four Apartments) includes the dedication of drainage and utility easements. In general,the proposed easements are larger than the existing easements to better accommodate the existing and proposed utilities. A notice of public hearing regarding the proposed alley and easement vacation was published and posted and letters were sent to the affected property owners along with the proposed resolution. Staff sent a letter to all private utility companies requesting their review and comment. Since the vacation is not adjacent to public waters, no Notice to the Cammissioner of Natural Resources is required. Consideration of this easement vacation was supported by resolution of the City Council in their meeting on August 7, 2013, and has been continued for consideration by the City Council since that time. Since the legal issues relevant to the conveyance of the parcel have not been resolved, staff recommends that the public hearing be closed and that no action be taken on the resolution. Recommended Action Motion to close the public hearing and take no action.