Loading...
3-24-14 Agenda PacketAGENDA GOLDEN VALLEY ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION Regular Meeting Golden Valley City Hall, 7800 Golden Valley Road Council Conference Room, Monday, March 24, 2014 7:OO PM 1. Call to Order 2. Approval of Regular Meeting Minutes — February 24, 2014 3. Vacant City Parcels — Round Table Discussion 4. Review Annual Report To Council 5. Select Representative For Community Center Task Force 6. Program/Project Updates (Staff) a) TMDL b) 1/1 c) Private Development Update d) Decola Ponds e) Recycling Update f) Wetland Management g) Bottineau Transitway 7. Commission Member Council Reports (Commissioners) 8. Other Business 9. Adjourn GOLDEN VALLEY ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION Regular Meeting Minutes February 24, 2014 Present: Commissioners Tracy Anderson, Tonia Galonska, Lynn Gitelis, Dawn Hill, Jim Stremel; Eric Eckman, Public Works Specialist and Lisa Nesbitt, Administrative Assistant Absent: Commissioner Debra Yahle 1. Call to Order Stremel called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. 2. Approval of Regular and Joint Meeting Minutes — January 27, 2014 MOVED by Hill, seconded by Galonska, and the motion carried unanimously to approve the minutes of the January 27, 2014 meetings. 3. Natural Resource Management Plan Commissioners were given a copy of a memo (on -file) prepared by the Parks Supervisor, for the Open Space and Recreation Commission regarding invasive species in the city. Eckman is working with S.E.H. to finalize the Natural Resource Management Plan outline and will forward it to the Environmental Commission and Open Space and Recreation Commission for review when completed. 4. Guidelines for Vacant City Parcels Maps and aerial views of the vacant city -owned parcels and rights-of-way were reviewed. Some ideas for managing these areas included: creating an adopt -a - parcel program, selling the parcel, asking associations and/or large groups to manage a parcel. The commission felt having a menu of options would be ideal when the city receives requests to manage a vacant parcel, and that each request would need to be handled on a case-by-case basis. Eckman will consult with the city attorney regarding the requirements for selling a tax forfeit parcel. S. Discuss Annual Report to Council Staff will prepare a draft of the annual report which will be reviewed at the next meeting. Stremel will present to Council in April. 6. Program/Project Updates Summary on -file. 7. Commission Member Council Reports None 8. Other Business Gitelis reported that the legislative session starts Tuesday (2/25). There are no environmental bills in this session. Minutes of the Environmental Commission February 24, 2014 Page 2 of 2 9. Adiourn MOVED by Gitelis, seconded by Hill, and the motion carried to adjourn. The meeting adjourned at 8:10 pm. Lisa Nesbitt Administrative Assistant Date: March 12, 2014 i & 1 Public Works Department 763-593-8030 / 763-593-3988 (fax) To: Golden Valley Environmental Commission From: Eric Eckman, Public Works Specialist zz�l Subject: Guidelines for City Open Space Parcels and Rights -of -Way C: Rick Birno, Director of Parks and Recreation Sandy Werts, Volunteer Coordinator Al Lundstrom, Park Maintenance Supervisor On February 24, 2014, the Environmental Commission reviewed a preliminary inventory of City - owned open space parcels, unimproved right-of-way, and MnDOT turnback property. These properties are considered open spaces and are not intensely managed or routinely maintained by the City. The Commission discussed ideas for developing guidelines that will help the City manage these properties with limited resources and provide direction when responding to requests from the public. The Commission also suggested creating a menu of potential uses and land covers that could be applied to these properties in the future. Draft lists of the guidelines and uses are included below for review and discussion at the March meeting. It is anticipated that the Commission's work on this task will benefit the City's volunteer program and will be included in the City's Natural Resource Management Plan scheduled for 2014. Guidelines for Open Space properties (to be applied when evaluating properties or in response to requests from the public) 1. Review adopted City policies and policies set forth in comprehensive parks plan and future natural resource management plan. 2. Determine if property is needed for City purposes such as public works operations, recreation events and activities, etc. 3. Determine whether property is tax forfeit and providing a specific use as classified through tax forfeit process (ponding, conservation, roadway, utility, etc.). 4. Perform site visit with individual or group requesting action. • Develop a list of items to consider when performing an inspection. G:\Environmental Commission\Memos\EC_memo_guidelines_open space parcels 032414.docx 5. Identify whether the property is located within a "greenway corridor," close to or connecting to parks, nature areas, trails, wooded areas, or other public or private natural areas. (This may be discussed during the development of the NRMP.) 6. Identify properties that have potential to be buildable and could be prepared for sale. • Determine if property is tax forfeit or has other deed restrictions. 7. Identify "sliver" properties maintained by adjacent owner and seek to transfer property. 8. Determine if unneeded rights-of-way could be vacated and combined with adjacent properties, especially if adjacent owner is maintaining. 9. Develop a contract similar to the adopt -a -park contract for a specific task/activity and for a specified duration — one month, one year, two years, etc. (be clear about expectations after expiration of the contract). 10. Determine if a permit, agreement, or other instrument is more appropriate for certain activities, i.e., access, or planting one tree in adjacent right-of-way. 11. Direct a volunteer group to perform a specific one-time task or opportunity. 12. Direct Sentencing to Service, Tree Trust, or similar to perform a one-time task or ongoing maintenance activity. 13. Direct professional consultant to maintain and monitor site (similar to Prairie Restorations with native vegetation buffers). 14. City crews perform a one-time task or ongoing maintenance activity if it makes sense to do so. 15. Create a communications plan to be carried out prior to any action involving open space properties. Potential Activities, Uses, and Land Covers (final guide or handout should include photo examples) 1. Leave as is or in its natural state. 2. Allow removal of trash and debris. 3. Allow removal of invasive or noxious species. 4. Plant trees and shrubs; remove trees and brush. 5. Establishment of native vegetation — shoreline, upland, prairie, grasses, etc. 6. Establish vegetation that encourages pollinators - insects, bees, butterflies. 7. Native or natural vegetation buffers around water bodies. 8. Low maintenance grasses that require mowing 2-4 times per year. 9. Manicured turf or landscaping (and possibly irrigation), especially if historically manicured. 10. Mulching, planting, installing plugs, seeding (only approved vegetation types). 11. Stormwater practices such as infiltration, filtration, and bioretention basins (rain gardens), and drainage swales. 12. Herb garden, neighborhood garden plots. 13. Inspecting, monitoring, and reporting activities. 14. Improvements that complement or enhance the open space including interpretive signage, benches, fences, trails (including wood chip), and possibly retaining walls, garbage/recycling cans, and picnic tables. 15. Uses and purposes as described and classified through the tax forfeit process. G:\Environmental Commission\Memos\EC_memo_guidelines open space parcels 032414.docx Following is an updated schedule for this task: February Review map and list of parcels, aerial photos and Google Streetview® March Review ideas for open space guidelines and potential uses, roundtable discussion with Sandy Werts, Volunteer Coordinator, and Al Lundstrom, Park Maintenance Supervisor April Field trip to visit several example properties (weather dependent) May Finalize inventory, guidelines, and potential uses for inclusion in the NRMP G:\Environmental Commission\Memos\EC memo_guidelines_open space parcels_032414.docx city vj goldven iU y 2013 ANNUAL REPORT GOLDEN VALLEY ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION Prepared by Jim Stremel, Vice Chair April 2014 In accordance with Section 2.50, Subd. 4 of the Golden Valley City Code, the Golden Valley Environmental Commission submits the following report of its 2013 activities, organized by the Commission's duties and responsibilities. Summary The primary focus of the Environmental Commission during 2013 was completing its research and making a recommendation to the City Council regarding a change to Section 10.32 of the City Code (chicken keeping) and developing the framework for a Natural Resource Management Plan to be completed in 2014. The Commission also received updates on the City's new curbside recycling program. At the monthly Commission meetings, program and project updates were routinely received from staff. Updates provide the Commission with an opportunity to review and provide input to staff from an environmental perspective, and to identify issues the Commission might want to address. Chickens At the request of the City Council, in May 2012, the Environmental Commission began studying the hobby of backyard chicken keeping. As part of the study, the Commission heard from professionals who spoke on behalf of the benefits, drawbacks, wildlife impacts, and enforceability of amending the City Code to allow residents to participate in the hobby. After hearing testimony from many points of view and conducting individual research work, Commissioners deliberated over the issue. As with any topic, both positive and negative aspects of chicken keeping were identified. The challenge the Commissioners addressed was weighing these factors against the greater environmental considerations for the City. In January 2013, on a 4-3 vote, the Commission decided to recommend to the City Council a modification to Section 10.32 of the City Code to allow the keeping of chickens. Environmental Commission Chair Rich Baker presented the Commission's final report and recommendation at the March 12, 2013 Golden Valley Council/Manager meeting. On June 16, 2013 the City Council approved the code revision to allow the keeping of chickens upon meeting certain conditions and obtaining a license. G:\Environmental Commission\Annual Report\2013 GVEC Annual Report.docx try of goldvenl Since the approval of the code revision one license has been issued. There have been no issues or complaints heard by staff. Natural Resource Management Plan In 2012, City staff provided guidance and assistance to students from the University of Minnesota who completed a capstone project titled, Sustainable Natural Resource Management in Golden Valley. The students presented their ideas and recommendations at a joint meeting of the Environmental and Open Space and Recreation Commissions, City Council, and staff. One of the recommendations included the development of a comprehensive natural resource management plan. The Environmental Commission included this recommendation as the top priority in its 2013 work plan. On May 14, 2013 the City Council approved the Environmental Commission's work plan to develop a Natural Resource Management Plan (NRMP) which will be incorporated into the City's comprehensive plan during the next update. The NRMP will include objectives, policies, and an implementation program identifying specific and achievable projects. Other important components of the plan include: • Identifying opportunities to provide natural resource education to residents and property owners • Converting the City's existing natural resource practices into formal policies • Creating an inventory of City -owned open space parcels and rights-of-way and exploring ways to improve the use and appearance of these properties • Identifying partnerships and grant opportunities to help the City achieve its natural resource objectives During the last few months of 2013, the Environmental Commission and Open Space and Recreation Commission worked jointly with a consultant, S.E.H., Inc., to provide direction and develop a framework for the Natural Resource Management Plan. The Environmental Commission will work with staff and the consultant to complete the plan in 2014. Curbside Recycling January 1, 2012 was the start of the City's new curbside recycling program. Following is an update on program initiatives in 2013. Recycling Tonnage The amount of material collected in 2013 was 2,237.92 tons (4,475,840 pounds). This is down 5.3% as compared to 2012. However, the tonnage in 2013 was up 13.9% over 2011 tonnage under the old recycling system. The City received $22,364.67 in revenue sharing for 2013. G:\Environmental Commission\Annual Report\2013 GVEC Annual Report.docx city of golden� Y Multi-family/Commercial/Institutional Recycling Currently, four properties participate in the program. Mighty Tidy Day A total of 549 vehicles came to drop off items at the annual Mighty Tidy Day at Brookview Park. Participation in 2013 increased 12.5% over last year and tied the record attendance back in 2008. Fall Leaf Drop Over the four days of the 2013 Fall Leaf Drop, 723 unique vehicles made 1,318 trips to drop off leaves. This is an average of 1.8 trips per day per vehicle which is the same average as last year. On Saturday, November 9, a single day record was set with 811 trips were made during the six hour event. To put this in perspective, 811 trips in six hours is an average of 2.25 vehicles per minute for the entire six hours. 2013 Initiatives — Check-in Have more residents sign up for the City's recycling updates email listserv. The primary method of advertising will be reminders in the City newsletter and website. As of today, 647 emails (some being City staff) are registered to receive updates. UPDATE: As of January 6, 2014, 851 emails (some being City staff) are registered. This is 31% increase in one year. Mail a recycling informational flyer to all curbside recycling customers in early 2013. This is done as part of the requirement from Hennepin County for recycling education efforts. UPDATE: This was completed in early 2013 and will be repeated in 2014. Continue to evaluate the recycling in the Parks pilot program. UPDATE: The program will be expanded in 2014 due to the success in 2013. Provide more promotion on Hennepin County's A -to -Z Guide for Disposal, Choose to Reuse Program, Recycle Half, and Fix -It Clinics. UPDATE: More information was included online and in City Newsletter articles in 2013. G:\Environmental Commission\Annual Report\2013 GVEC Annual Report.docx city of goldenvl� Y 2014 Initiatives 1. Continue to promote residents signing up for the City's recycling updates email listserve. Currently, there are 851 emails registered. 2. Mail a recycling informational flyer to all curbside recycling customers in early 2014. This is done as part of the requirement from Hennepin County for recycling education efforts. 3. Continue to evaluate the recycling in the parks pilot program. 4. Continue to promote Hennepin County's A -to -Z Guide for Disposal, Choose to Reuse Program, Recycle Half, and Fix -It Clinics. G:\Environmental Commission\Annual Report\2013 GVEC Annual Report.docx 4 city of go ldenl� valley Date: March 19, 2014 MEMORANDUM Public Works Department 763-593-8030 / 763-593-3988 (fax) To: Environmental Commission From: Jeannine Clancy, Director of Public Works Subject: Brookview Community Center Task Force A Community Center Task Force is being formed to facilitate the needs assessment process for Brookview Community Center. Representatives will be appointed from the Planning, Environmental, and Envision commissions to commit to one meeting a month for the next six months beginning in May. The task force will meet on Tuesday evenings from 5:30 to 7:30 pm. Along with representation from the commissions, various members from other committees and staff members from Planning, Public Works, and Communications will be on the task force. Please appoint one representative to the task force from the Environmental Commission. G:\Environmental Commission\Memos\BrookviewTaskForce.docx C'111) ol fW AW 9olden-, Request for Qualifications & Quote: Architectural Services for Needs Assessment, Conceptual Design and Cost Estimates for a Community Center PURPOSE The City of Golden Valley is seeking proposals for Architectural Services for a community task force needs assessment, conceptual design and estimated construction budget for a community center of approximately 40,000 square feet of building (not including parking requirements). Proposers must have demonstrated experience in site and building design and in estimating construction costs of municipal community centers. Architectural services will include, assessment of current community center, all meeting notes, data collection, meeting materials, task force meeting facilitation, staff work sessions, final report and conceptual building design with estimated construction costs. Architectural services will also be expected to present at up to three council/manger meetings. The analysis will include a review of input from Community Center Task Force, identification of building program needs as well as to help refine space requirements for each program component and costs associated with each of them (construction). The new community center concept would be located on the same property as the current Brookview Community Center, however there is an opportunity to take advantage of current programming and eliminate out buildings and possibly shift (North-South) to a new location within property. As a part of this process, the chosen architect will assist in site analysis and building layouts based on location options. TASK FORCE MISSION The mission of the Community Center Task Force is to provide input based on historical use patterns, community needs, staff input, future program and revenue opportunities, as well as gather new information to make a recommendation to the City Council regarding the construction of a new community center at Brookview. The Task Force will be scheduled to meet six (6) times with facilitation provided by selected consultant and staff representatives. A preliminary meeting schedule is outlined below: • Review current building, use patterns, issues, needs and opportunities • Tour similar concept area centers/golf operations • Discuss impressions and opportunities from the facility tours keeping in mind what types of things would potentially be a good fit for Golden Valley/determine priorities for Golden Valley/imagine ideal Community Center • Review an initial program space design based on input from Task Force and staff. Prioritize key components if needed. • Check in meeting with City Council • Review program and design to be presented to City Council/review needs and priorities again to be sure the program reflects the desires of the Task Force and staff • Final Task Force meeting/review recommended proposal and facility report for presentation to the City Council. GENERAL SCOPE OF SERVICE The design firm will: • Brookview Community Center Assessment: Develop an assessment of the current Community Center and provide opinion as to whether or not it should be considered as an option for remodeling/addition. • Facilitate Community Task Force Process: Work with appointed Community Task Force and staff on issues, needs, building location, design and program components. • Program Development: Review and refine the preliminary program for each of the components. The architect will look at the desires and intentions for each component's use and be sure enough space is included for all potential needs. The architect, based on past experiences, will be called upon to suggest additional enhancements to the facility. • Location: Recommend building location based on opportunities and current use patterns for site. • Schematic Designs/Concept Plans: Schematic building plans and alternatives should be prepared for potential locations within the site. At this time we are looking at the feasibility of building a new facility at Brookview and its fit with surrounding and new uses. Successful designs must consider the surrounding existing uses, scale, and character, as well as future land use plans of the site. The City Council is very interested in having the site and building be a unique design with a lot of character utilizing low maintenance building materials. • Preliminary costs estimates for construction: A cost estimate for construction should be developed based on program components, building layout and location. • Meetings: Attend and facilitate all task force meetings (6), all consultant/staff work session meetings and associated project meetings (including design and working group meetings) (8-10). Plan to attend up to three (3) City Council meetings as a part of this process. PROJECT TENTATIVE TIMELINE Architecture firm hired: Week of April 14'h, 2014 Initial meeting with project lead: Week ofApril 21", 2014 Community Center Task Force Appointed: May 6'h, 2014 Task Force Meeting #1: Tuesday, May 20'h, 2014 Task Force Meeting #2(tour): Tuesday, June 1 Th, 2014 Task Force Meeting #3: Tuesday, July 15'h, 2014 Task Force Meeting #4: Tuesday, August 12'h, 2014 City Council Check-in meeting: Tuesday, September 9`h, 2014 Task Force Meeting #S: Tuesday, September 16`h, 2014 Task Force Meeting #6: Tuesday, October 14'h, 2014 City Council check-in meeting: Wednesday, November 12'h, 2014 Note: Task Force meetings will be scheduled from 5:30 — 7:30 p.m. on scheduled dates. Council check-in meetings will begin at 6:30 p.m. The City of Golden Valley would like this part of the project completed by November 7`", 2014 for final presentation to City Council on November 12 , 2014. The City Council can then decide if they wish to pursue this project by going forward with public meetings and financing plans. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS The deadline for proposals is 10 a.m. on Friday, March 28`h, 2014. Please submit four (4) paper and one (1) electronic copy of the proposal for City review. Proposals should not exceed 12 pages and should provide the following information: 1. Clearly identify the firm, address, telephone number, contact person responsible for the proposal, and their e-mail address. 2. Provide brief informational statement about the firm. 3. Clearly identify all consultants proposed and each discipline and the specific services each consultant will be providing. 4. Provide brief background, of experience in design and construction of municipal community centers and sustainable sites and buildings. 5. Proposals must clearly indicate the design team for the firm and who will be assigned to this project as principal, architect, engineer, project managers, etc. 6. Provide a list of projects that are similar in type (i.e. community and recreation centers) and scope that the firm has completed in the last five years. For the projects identified, please provide the total construction cost and price per square foot, the name and telephone number of the owners' representatives on the projects, and your firm's principal and team for each project. 7. Provide an overview of your firm's understanding of and approach to the project. 8. Provide a brief statement on what distinguishes your firm from others that might be considered for this project. 9. List and describe your scope of services by bullet point. 10. Present any additional information not requested that may be useful and applicable to the selection process. 11. Describe your professional fees, basic services and deliverables for task force facilitation, staff work sessions, program area identification, planning, site design, facility design, city council meetings and construction estimation. The proposed fee for services shall be a not to exceed amount, should clearly indicate the hourly rate of each team member and the hours and percentage of time each team member will dedicate to the project and list any reimbursable expenses that are anticipated for this project. 12. Reponses must be sent to and questions directed to the project lead: Rick Birno Director of Parks and Recreation City of Golden Valley 200 Brookview Parkway Golden Valley, MN 55426 (763) 512-2342 rbimo@goldenvalleymn.gov SELECTION PROCESS A selection committee comprised of staff from Administration, Public Works, Community Development and Parks & Recreation will review all submissions. Selected firms will be invited for an interview. The timeline for the selection process is as follows: • Submission deadline: March 280', 2014, 10 a.m. • Review of responses: March 31" to April 4th, 2014 • Notification to firms selected for interviews: April 7th, 2014 • Interviews: Scheduled for Friday, April 1 I th, 2014 ACCEPTANCE/REJECTION OF PROPOSALS The City of Golden Valley intends to enter into a contract with the selected firm that best satisfies the needs of the City. This RFP does not commit the City to award a contract or share in any expense of preparing these proposals. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Each proposal will be evaluated based on the Consultant's response to the Request for Proposal. Emphasis will be placed upon experience with similar projects, ability to meet proposed schedule, project understanding, direct experience and time involved with municipal service consulting and fiscal requirements. City staff review may require additional information during the selection process. The City of Golden Valley will not be liable for any expense incurred by the Consultant in preparing or submitting the proposal. The City of Golden Valley reserves the right to reject any and all proposals and to waive any irregularities in a proposal. Selected consultants will be contacted ager City review of the proposals and scheduled for an interview. The selected firm will enter into a standard AIA contract (as modified by the City) with the City of Golden Valley. ATTACHMENTS • Site map of the potential location options NO CONTACT Proposers are prohibited from contacting any elected official for purposes of lobbying to secure this contract. COMMUNITY CENTER TASK FORCE 2 members from the Open Space and Recreation Commission (selected by Commission) 1 member from the Planning Commission (selected by Commission) 1 member from the Environmental Commission (selected by Commission) 1 member from the Envision Commission (selected by Commission) 1 member Teen Committee (selected by Committee) 1 member from the Brookview Seniors Program (Staff facilitated) 1 member from the Brookview Men's Golf Association (Staff facilitated) 1 member from the Brookview Women's Golf Association (Staff facilitated) 2 members from Golden Valley Youth Athletic Associations (Staff facilitated) 3 staff representatives from Parks & Recreation Department 1 staff representative from Planning Department 2 staff representatives from Brookview Golf Department 1 staff representative from Public Works Department 1 staff representative from Communications Department Task Force commitment would be a total of six meetings, one meeting per - month beginning in May on Tuesday evenings from 5:30 - 7:30 p.m. PROGRAM/PROJECT UPDATES — March 2014 TMDL No updates II Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) and the City of Golden Valley continue to see reductions in Inflow and Infiltration (1/1) related sanitary sewer flows on an annual basis. Since the inception of the 1/1 surcharge program in 2005, MCES has recorded a constant reduction in its wastewater treatment volumes. Over the last ten years, MCES has decreased the amount of treated effluent leaving their facility by almost 900 million gallons per year. This constitutes a reduction in 9,000 million gallons of wastewater treated over the past ten years. The City of Golden Valley has seen a 30% reduction in its own wasterwater flows leaving the City since 1/1 reduction work began in 2001. The City has also seen its peak discharge rates drop from 13.8 million gallons per day (MGD) in 2005 to 9.3 MGD in 2013. These decreases in sanitary sewer flow are due to private property owner's work on the Point of Sale Program and the City's continued dedication to annual 1/1 reduction projects. MCES and the City of Golden Valley still have a lot of work to do to reduce 1/1 within the sanitary sewer system; however, it is encouraging to see the results show such a significant reduction in 1/1 in our area. City of Golden Valley Wastewater Metered (MG) t 300 120(} 1100 low 700 2000 2001 2007 7003 7004 200S 21M 2001 2008 2OD9 2010 2011 2012 Year PRIVATE DEVELOPMENTS Porsche of Minneapolis Twin Cities Automotive (9191 and 9393 Wayzata Boulevard) has applied for a PUD amendment to expand the Porsche dealership building and to modify the parking lot. New shop, office, and employee facilities—as well as a car wash—would be added to the north and to the southeast portions of the existing building. Pervious pavers would be used in some of the parking spaces used for display of vehicles. The Planning Commission approved the Preliminary PUD plan on January 13, 2014; the City Council approved the Preliminary PUD plan on February 5, 2014. The Final PUD plan was approved by the Planning Commission on March 10, 2014, and will go to the City Council on April 1, 2014. Morrie's Automotive Morrie's Automotive Group is applying for a PUD to construct a new stand-alone showroom facility on the southeastern corner of the Cadillac Saab property at 12520 Wayzata Boulevard. It would replace existing display parking and would consist of a two level showroom for luxury vehicles. New landscaping would reduce the amount of impervious surface on the lot. The Preliminary PUD plan is scheduled be reviewed by the Planning Commission on March 24, 2014. Wessin Property A subdivision application has been received for the parcel of land located south of Major/Noble Drive and west of Sweeny Lake. The proposal is to subdivide this lot into two, with a smaller lot being carved out of the larger lot on the north end. It is scheduled to go before the Planning Commission on March 24, 2014. 221 Sunnyridge Lane A subdivision application has been received to divide one single family lot into two single family lots. The existing single family home would remain. It is scheduled to go before the Planning Commission on March 24, 2014. 125 Cutacross Road A subdivision application has been received to divide one single family lot into two single family lots. The existing single family home would be demolished. It is scheduled to go before the Planning Commission on March 24, 2014. 7218 Harold Avenue A subdivision application has been received to divide one single family lot into two single family lots. Variances are also being sought from the lot width and side yard setback requirements. The existing single family home would be demolished. It is scheduled to go before the Planning Commission on March 24, 2014. Tennant Tennant Company (701 Lilac Drive) has applied for a PUD for their main campus in Golden Valley. The PUD would consolidate the property into one lot and allow for better pedestrian connections between buildings. Future building sites are also planned. Fire access, water quality, and water storage would be improved as part of the PUD. Tennant received Preliminary PUD plan approval from the Planning Commission in October; the City Council approved the Preliminary PUD plan on February 5, 2014. At this date, the Final PUD plan application has not been submitted. 3.9.4 The 3.9.4 is a project that includes a market rate, multi -generational apartment building as well as a market rate, senior assisted living apartment building located at the northwest corner of the Highway 100/Interstate Highway 394 intersection. The City/HRA continues to work with MnDOT regarding the terms of the sale of the MnDOT property. The City Council approved the Final PUD Plan for the 3.9.4 on October 15, 2013. At this time, a lawsuit has halted the process and the timeline for the approval of the Final Plat and Development Agreement by the City Council is unknown. Bellboy The owner of Bellboy (6005 Zane Avenue North) was denied a variance from the Board of Zoning Appeals on January 28, 2014, from a side yard setback. A parking lot had recently been constructed within the 10 foot landscaped buffer. The applicant has chosen not to appeal the decision, but has not brought the property into compliance. The City is taking legal action to correct the situation. DECOLA PONDS The City Council will be considering the Cooperative Agreement with Crystal and New Hope, and the proposal from Barr Engineering to perform the study at the March 18th meeting. If approved, it is anticipated that work will begin in April 2014 and be completed within one year. RECYCLING UPDATE No updates WETLAND MANAGEMENT No updates BOTTINEAU TRANSITWAY The Bottineau LRT Planning Advisory Committee has held three meetings and is ready to begin work with the County's consultant team, led by SRF, to carry out station area planning for the two potential LRT stations located in Golden Valley. A representative from the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board will attend the April meeting to discuss potential impacts on Theodore Wirth Park. The project's Draft Environmental Impact Statement is expected to be released for public comment in April of 2014 and public meetings will take place shortly after.