08-06-14 CC Agenda Packet (entire) AGENDA
Regular Meeting
of the
City Council
Golden Valley City Hall
7800 Golden Valley Road
Council Chamber
August 6, 2014
6:30 pm
The Council may consider item numbers 1, 2, 3, 5 and 6
prior to the public hearings scheduled at 7 pm
1. CALL TO ORDER PAGES
A. Roll Call
B. Pledge of Allegiance
C. Northwest Hennepin Human Services Council Presentation 3
2. ADDITIONS AND CORRECTIONS TO AGENDA
3. CONSENT AGENDA
Approval of Consent Agenda - All items listed under this heading are considered to be
routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no
discussion of these items unless a Council Member or citizen so requests in which
event the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered in its
normal sequence on the agenda.
A. Approval of Check Register
1. City 4
2. Housing and Redevelopment Authority 5
B. Minutes of Boards and Commissions:
1. Planning Commission - June 9, 2014 6-17
2. Environmental Commission - June 23, 2014 18-19
3. Board of Zoning Appeals - May 27, 2014 20-23
C. Approval of Requests for Beer and/or Wine Brookview Park 24-25
D. On-Sale, Sunday Sale Liquor License, change in ownership, Red Lobster Hospitality,
LLC d/b/a Red Lobster#0157 26
E. Second Consideration - Ordinance No. 526 - Amending Section 9.07 - Winter Parking
Regulations 27-29
F. Second Consideration - Ordinance No. 525 - Amending Section 2.30-2.36 - City
Departments 30-32
G. Resolution Authorizing Cooperative Agreement with Hennepin County for Brogger
Circle Drainage Improvements 14-60 33-41
H. Receipt of June Financial Reports 42-49
I. Resolution Authorizing Sale of Excess Equipment 14-61 50-51
J. Resolution Authorizing Application to MNDOT Community Roadside Landscaping
Partnership Program for Highway 55 Lilac Planting 14-62 52-53
4. PUBLIC HEARINGS 7 PM
A. Public Hearing - Preliminary Plat Approval - Hanson Wood Shores - Property South
of Major/Noble Drives and West of Sweeney Lake 54
B. Public Hearing - Preliminary PUD Plan for Trevilla Complex PUD No. 72, Amendment
#2 - 7475 Country Club Drive - Albert Miller, Applicant 55-95
5. OLD BUSINESS
6. NEW BUSINESS
A. Resolution Establishing Departments of the City 14-63 96-98
B. Resolution Modifying 2014 General Wages and Salary for New Physical Development
Director, Planning Manager, and Associate Planner/Grant Writer Positions 14-64 99-100
C. Resolution Approval of Plat - Olson Tralee 14-65 and 14-66 101-105
D. Announcements of Meetings
E. Mayor and Council Communications
7. ADJOURNMENT
Special Council/Manager Meeting to immediately follow:
-Discussion of Economic Development for Winnetka and Medicine Lake
1 o z ��s
d �.
MEMORANDUM
�y 0 1
� .
I,I
valley City Administration/Council
763-593-3991 /763-593-8109(fax)
Executive Summary For Action
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
August 6, 2014
Agenda Item
1. C. Northwest Hennepin Human Services Council Presentation
Prepared By
Thomas D. Burt, City Manager
Summary
Susan Blood, Executive Director, along with other staff members, will attend the meeting and
make a brief presentation on the services they provide.
Attachments
• Folder of information submitted by Northwest Hennepin Human Services Council (mailed)
city 0 = V a MEMORANDUM
goldenev vk4r
N
valley Finance Department
763-593-8013/763-593-8109(fax)
Executive Summary For Action
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
August 6, 2014
Agenda Item
3. A. 1. Approval of City Check Register
Prepared By
Sue Virnig, Finance Director
Summary
Approval of the check register for various vendor claims against the City of Golden Valley.
Attachments
• Document sent via email
Recommended Action
Motion to authorize the payment of the bills as submitted.
city 0)
golden rs ; NDUM
valley Finance Department
763-593-8013/763-593-8109(fax)
Executive Summary For Action
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
August 6, 2014
Agenda Item
3. A. 2. Approval of Housing and Redevelopment Authority Check Register
Prepared By
Sue Virnig, Finance Director
Summary
Approval of the check register for various vendor claims against the Housing and Redevelopment
Authority.
Attachments
• Document sent via email
Recommended Action
Motion to authorize the payment of the bills as submitted.
Regular Meeting of the
Golden Valley Planning Commission
June 9, 2014
A regular meeting of the Planning Commission was held at the Golden Valley City Hall,
Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota, on Monday,
June 9, 2014. Chair Kluchka called the meeting to order at 7 pm.
Those present were Planning Commissioners Baker, Cera, Kluchka, Segelbaum and
Waldhauser. Also present was Community Development Director Mark Grimes, City
Planner Jason Zimmerman and Administrative Assistant Lisa Wittman. Commissioner
Boudreau-Landis was absent.
1. Approval of Minutes
May 15, 2014, Joint Planning Commission, Environmental Commission and Open
Space and Recreation Commission Meeting
MOVED by Baker, seconded by Cera and motion carried unanimously to approve the
May 15, 2014, minutes as submitted. Commissioner Cera abstained from voting.
2. Continued Item — Informal Public Hearing — Final PUD Plan — Tennant
Company — 701 Lilac Drive North — PU-114
Applicant: Tennant Company
Address: 701 Lilac Drive North
Purpose: To allow for the consolidation of multiple properties into one parcel to
enable inter-campus connections.
Commissioner Segelbaum recused himself from this discussion.
Zimmerman stated that Tennant is seeking approval of their Final PUD plan which would
allow them to consolidate multiple parcels into one development site and establish inter-
campus connections. He stated that Tennant has created a master plan for its facility
and that this current phase of the plan seeks to create pedestrian and roadway
connections within the site. He added that Tennant has no immediate plans to construct
new buildings, but they envision a three story, 45,000 square foot, office building in the
future. Any future plans would also require City review and an amendment to their PUD.
Zimmerman discussed the Fire Department and Public Works Department concerns
during the Preliminary PUD process. He stated that Tennant has agreed to implement an
approved Fire Access Plan by July 1. Also, prior to Final PUD Plan approval, they will
provide a timeline for phased implementation of a Fire Protection Plan, install rain
gardens as part of the walkway construction, install an underground stormwater filtration
chamber within three years, demolish the vacant building located on Parcel 5 and
remove the sanitary sewer up to the main.
Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission
June 9, 2014
Page 2
Kluchka asked if all of the issues have been addressed or have timeline for when they
will be addressed. Zimmerman said yes and added that the intent is to have any
outstanding issues finalized by July 1 .
Waldhauser asked about the height limit for this property. Zimmerman noted that the
height limit is 45 feet and that the applicant's future plans indicate a three story building
which would not be allowed in this zoning district, however, since this is a PUD the future
building proposal will need to come back to the City for a PUD amendment and the
height of the building would be considered at that time.
Cera questioned the status of the homes that form an island in the middle of this
proposal. Zimmerman said he is not sure about the status of the homes.
Baker asked if the proposed walkways and stairs would be enclosed. Zimmerman said
no, and explained that the proposed sidewalks are not allowed to be built across
property lines, which is one of issues leading them to do one master plan for their
campus.
CJ Fernandez, representing the Applicant, referred to a site plan and discussed the two
main sidewalk/stairway connections they are proposing. He explained that Tennant's
office addition proposal was put on hold in 2008, but the need for the sidewalk
connections is the impetus for applying for a PUD now. He added that they will be doing
several other constructions projects as well, per the conditions of approval in the staff
reports, including fire lane access, re-striping of some of the parking stalls, new signage,
a water main extension, a stormwater treatment system, and a few other projects.
However, they will not be able to get them done by the July 1, 2014, deadline they were
given and they would like additional time to address these issues. He said Tennant is
agreeable to escrowing money for the work.
Waldhauser asked if the access points to the buildings will be accessible to all
employees. Larry Spears, Tennant Company, said all of their buildings are accessible.
Fernandez added that the sidewalks themselves will not be accessible because of the
grade and steep slopes. Waldhauser asked Spears if he thinks their employees will walk
to each building rather than drive. Spears said that is the intent and expectation. He
added that the proposed sidewalks are being added for safety as well, so employees
won't have to walk on the street.
Baker asked how many parking spaces will be lost as a result of the changes to the fire
lane. Fernandez said approximately 35 spaces will be lost. Kluchka asked how that will
affect their capacity. Fernandez said they currently have extra spaces, but losing 35 of
them will "max them out." Baker said they will have to consider parking when they do the
next phase of their development. Fernandez agreed.
Cera asked for an update about the single family homes that are surrounded by
Tennant's properties. Spears said they don't have any intent to purchase any of the
homes. Baker asked if the homes interfere with their "one campus" plans. Spears said
Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission
June 9, 2014
Page 3
no, the homes have been there for a long time and they are not an issue from their
perspective.
Michael Garant, 5540 Lindsay Street, said Tennant is metal stamping and dropping
metal which echoes through the neighborhood beginning at 7:00 and lasting until 10:00
or midnight every day except on Saturday and Sunday. Zimmerman said he would
follow-up regarding the complaint about noise. Kluchka said it is very relevant to the
Planning Commission if Tennant is not following the City's noise ordinance.
Randy Anderson, 5645 Lindsay Street, said Tennant has always been a very respectful
company. He said he has heard noise too, but it is no different than a train going by and
it is not as distracting as the previous speaker stated. He said their property is clean and
looks great and he is supportive of Tennant's request.
Seeing and hearing no one else wishing to comment, Kluchka closed the public hearing.
Cera stated that Tennant is not proposing to build anything at this point, they are just
consolidating their properties into one parcel which makes sense and he is in favor of the
proposal. Baker agreed.
Waldhauser asked when this proposal will go to the Bassett Creek Watershed
Commission for their review. Zimmerman said Tennant has been working closely with
the Public Works Department. He stated that their development will be a phased
approach and the timing will be worked out. Waldhauser said she wants to make sure
the proposal isn't done in small enough phases in order to avoid going to the Bassett
Creek Watershed Commission and asked if staff will know the timing before this proposal
goes to the City Council for review. Zimmerman said yes.
Kluchka said he thinks this proposal lines up with what a PUD should be.
MOVED by Waldhauser, seconded by Cera and motion carried unanimously to
recommend approval subject to the following findings and conditions:
Findings
1. The PUD plan is tailored to the specific characteristics of the site and achieves a
higher quality of site planning and design than generally expected under
conventional provisions of the ordinance.
2. The PUD plan preserves and protects substantial desirable portions of the site's
characteristics, open space and sensitive environmental features including steep
slopes, trees, scenic views, creeks, wetlands and open waters.
3. The PUD plan includes efficient and effective use (which includes preservation) of
the land.
4. The PUD Plan results in development compatible with adjacent uses and is
consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and redevelopment plans and goals.
5. The PUD plan is consistent with preserving and improving the general health, safety
and general welfare of the people of the City.
Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission
June 9, 2014
Page 4
6. The PUD plan meets the PUD Intent and Purpose provision and all other PUD
ordinance provisions.
Conditions
1. The plans dated April 25, 2014 prepared by LHB submitted with the application shall
become a part of this approval.
2. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Fire
Department to Mark Grimes, Community Development Director, dated May 19, 2014,
shall become part of this approval.
3. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Public Works
Department to Mark Grimes, Community Development Director, dated May 23, 2014,
shall become a part of this approval.
4. The implementation of the fire access restriping shall be completed prior to Final PUD
Plan approval.
5. The Applicant shall work with the Fire Department to reach an agreement regarding
the timing for implementation of the Fire Protection Plan prior to approval of the Final
PUD Plan.
6. The Applicant shall construct surface filtration (rain gardens) as part of the walkway
construction authorized under the Final PUD Plan.
7. The Applicant shall install a stormwater filtration chamber within three years of the
execution date of the Final PUD Plan.
8. The Applicant shall demolish the vacant building located on Parcel 5 and shall
remove the sanitary sewer up to the main prior to approval of the Final PUD Plan.
9. The Applicant shall submit a revised parking plan that meets accessibility
requirements with respect to the number and location of handicapped parking spaces
to the satisfaction of the City's Building Official prior to approval of the Final PUD Plan.
10.The Final Plat shall include "P.U.D. No. 114" in its title.
11.All signage must meet the requirements of the City's Sign Code (Section 4.20).
12.This approval is subject to all other state, federal, and local ordinances, regulations, or
laws with authority over this development.
3. Informal Public Hearing — Subdivision — 1001 Lilac Drive North — Golden
Valley Homes — SU12-15
Applicant: Max Zelayaran
Addresses: 1001 Lilac Drive North
Purpose: To reconfigure the existing property which would allow for the
construction of two new twin homes and one new single family home.
Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission
June 9, 2014
Page 5
4. Informal Public Hearing — Property Rezoning — 1001 Lilac Drive North —
Golden Valley Homes — ZO12-19
Applicant: Max Zelayaran
Address: 1001 Lilac Drive North
Purpose: To rezone a portion of the existing property from R-1 Single-Family
residential to R-2 Moderate Density residential to allow for the
construction of two twin homes.
The Informal Public Hearing for Items 3 and 4 were combined as was the discussion.
Zimmerman referred to a site plan of the property and explained the applicant's
proposal to subdivide the currently vacant lot it into five separate lots. One R-1 Single
Family Residential lot would remain and four lots would be rezoned to R-2 Moderate
Density Residential to allow for the construction of four twin home units. All of the
proposed new lots meet the area requirements of the Zoning Code; however, Lots 2 & 3
would be 116.43 feet wide instead of the required 120 feet. The City is also requiring an
additional 5-foot dedication of right-of-way to bring Lindsay Street into compliance so
the applicant is requesting an 8.57 foot variance to allow the width to be 111.43 feet. He
stated that staff is recommending approval of this proposal as it is compatible with the
two existing twin homes directly south across Lindsay Street and it is consistent with the
density designated in the Comprehensive Plan.
Kluchka asked if the property line between the two proposed R-2 lots could be moved
further north in order to obtain additional lot width. Zimmerman stated that the lot to the
north meets the width requirement and there isn't enough overall width to make both
lots conform.
Cera asked about the hardship for allowing Lot 2 to be smaller than required.
Zimmerman stated that hardship doesn't have to be proven; the standard is to consider
practical difficulties. Cera questioned the process and asked which action has to
happen first, the subdivision or the rezoning. Zimmerman stated that the two can be
considered concurrently.
Segelbaum asked how many lots could be created if the property remained R-1 Single
Family residential. Zimmerman said there could possibly be three single family lots
created. He added that the applicant could also have one single family lot and 1 twin
home lot.
Grimes stated that the City Code requires each unit to have its own sewer and water.
Also, in order for each twin home to have a separate tax I.D. number, there needs to be
a lot line through the middle of the two units and a covenant agreement in place.
Max Zelayaran, Applicant, stated he is proposing to have one single family home and
two, two-family homes, but he is willing to be flexible and build two single family homes
Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission
June 9, 2014
Page 6
and one two-family home. He stated that if he builds two twin homes there will be a
chance for more families to live here.
Kluchka asked the applicant if he can sell the size of house he is proposing right next to
Highway 100. Zelayaran stated that there is a sound wall and that it is a very convenient
and peaceful area.
Waldhauser asked about the steep grade of the property. Zelayaran stated that the
single family home will be set back further on the property and that the grade of the
property isn't going to be a problem.
Kluchka asked the applicant if he plans to build the houses and then sell them or to
build custom homes, or to use the homes for rental properties. Zelayaran said that the
homes will not be luxury homes. Baker asked the applicant if will sell the vacant lots or if
he intends to build the houses. Zelayaran said he plans to build the single family home
first and see what happens with the market after that.
Cera asked the applicant if he had a neighborhood meeting. Zelayaran said no.
Segelbaum asked about the price of the proposed homes. Zelayaran said the homes
would be $180,000 to $200,000. Segelbaum asked the applicant how long he has
owned the property. Zelayaran said he has owned the property for ten years.
Segelbaum asked the applicant why he hasn't developed the property until now.
Zelayaran said the economy was too bad. Kluchka asked the applicant when he wants
to start construction. Zelayaran stated he'd like to start construction as soon as he gets
approval.
Randy Anderson, 5645 Lindsay Street, said this property used to be a fire station and
an area where kids played. He said the neighborhood is starting to turn over and there
are no parks nearby, so he thinks this property would be good for a park, not for homes.
He said there is freeway noise and it is going to be loud. He said he understands
development, but he is opposed to two sets of twin homes because they become
rentals which are not always the best thing. He said he is also concerned about the
grade of the lot and having cars backing out onto the frontage road. He said a
neighborhood meeting would have been nice and that he would prefer a single family
home and one twin home.
Ronald Garant, 5540 Lindsay Street, asked how the drainage for this proposed
development would work because it sits a lot higher than his property and he doesn't
want to get flooded out. He said he doesn't have too much against the proposal, but it
seems that the property isn't big enough for all that is being proposed, He reiterated that
his main concern is the drainage.
Michael Garant, 5540 Lindsay Street, said he is opposed to allowing two twin homes
and he would rather see two single family homes and one twin home because there are
already two twin homes across the street from this property that aren't being
Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission
June 9, 2014
Page 7
maintained. Kluchka asked Garant if the existing twin homes on Lindsay are rental
properties. Garant said yes.
Leo Anderson, 5625 Lindsay Street, said Lindsay Street is supposed to be
reconstructed in 2016 and questioned if this proposal fits with those plans especially if
the corner is straightened out. He stated that cars coming from the west screech around
this corner and the lot to the north of this property is owned by MnDOT and doesn't get
mowed.
David O'Donnell, 1107 Welcome Avenue, said he doesn't like this project. He said he
doesn't mind single family homes, but this is creating a neighborhood of rentals and
nobody is going to build their dream house next to a highway. He said he is also
concerned about the traffic.
Seeing and hearing no one else wishing to comment, Kluchka closed the public hearing.
Kluchka questioned if this is the right place for R-2 zoning. Segelbaum stated that
generally, changes in zoning should be done with longer range planning, with
Comprehensive Plan updates or when a property can't be developed under its current
zoning classification. He added that the area surrounding this proposal is mostly R-1.
Zimmerman noted that R-1 and R-2 zoned properties are consistent with the low density
Comprehensive Plan designation.
Cera said he doesn't typically like "spot zoning" or rezoning property for a specific
development, but questioned if building three homes in the $400,000 range would sell in
this location. He stated that there are also many double bungalows that are owner
occupied, not rentals. Kluchka agreed and stated that the City has stronger rental
licensing laws than it has in the past. Grimes said he doesn't see this proposal as "spot
zoning" because R-1 and R-2 properties are permitted in the low density category in the
Comprehensive Plan.
Waldhauser asked there have been staff discussions about straightening out Lindsay
Street. Zimmerman said not to his knowledge.
Baker asked if a neighborhood meeting was held. Zimmerman stated that this
application pre-dated the City's new neighborhood meeting policy.
Kluchka asked about the drainage concerns mentioned by the neighbors. Zimmerman
explained that the City has requirements about not adversely altering drainage during
development. He said that a grading plan will be required during the building permit
process. Grimes referred to the City Engineer's staff report and stated that each lot will
be required to have separate stormwater management permits, and that the developer
must be sure that existing drainage patterns are maintained without negative impacts.
Waldhauser said it is encouraging that the houses are in a more affordable range, but
the traffic at the corner concerns her.
Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission
June 9, 2014
Page 8
Segelbaum said his preference would be to have the properties remain R-1 unless the
applicant can show that the property is just not selling with the current zoning
designation. Cera said there are other R-2 properties in this neighborhood and that this
proposal may be a viable option.
Baker said he agrees with Commissioners Waldhauser and Cera that it is important to
provide a less expensive housing option. He said he appreciates the neighbor's
concerns that these could be rental properties, but the City has no control over that. He
added that he would have liked to have seen better communication with the
neighborhood.
Grimes suggested that a turnaround driveway area be added so cars don't have to back
onto Lilac Drive. Waldhauser asked how that requirement could be attached to the
property if someone builds there in the future. Grimes said the City can't require a
turnaround driveway area, but it can be a recommendation.
MOVED by Cera, seconded by Cathy and motion carried 4 to 1 to recommend approval
of the Rezoning and Subdivision with Variance requests subject to the following
conditions. Commissioner Segelbaum voted no.
1. A Variance regarding lot width is permitted for Lot 2 allowing it to be 111.43 feet in width
instead of the required 120 feet.
2. The City Attorney will determine if a title review is necessary prior to approval of the final
plat.
3. The "Declaration of Covenants, Restrictions, and Conditions" shall be approved by the
City Attorney prior to the issuance of any building permits.
4. A park dedication fee of $1,600 shall be paid prior to approval of the final plat.
5. The City Engineer's memorandum, dated June 2, 2014, shall become part of this
approval.
6. A Subdivision Development Agreement may be required.
7. All applicable City permits shall be obtained prior to the development of the new lots.
5. Informal Public Hearing — Preliminary PUD Plan Review — Carousel
Automobiles (Porsche Dealership) PUD #95, Amendment#3
Applicant: Twin Cities Automotive (Porsche)
Address: 9191 Wayzata Blvd.
Purpose: To allow for the construction of a new Porsche building.
Zimmerman referred to a site plan of the property and explained the applicant's request
to amend their existing PUD to allow for the construction of a new Porsche building in
the existing parking lot located to the west of their Audi building. The proposed new
building would be two stories with a footprint of 24,240 square feet. The first floor would
be used for showroom space, sales offices, service areas and a car wash. The second
Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission
June 9, 2014
Page 9
floor would be for employee facilities and parts storage. He showed renderings of the
proposed new building and noted the fagade would be similar to the existing Porsche
building with silver aluminum panels in front and grey precast panels on the sides and
rear. He referred to the parking on the site and explained that there are currently 636
parking spaces. This proposal shows a reduction of 64 spaces for a total of 572 parking
spaces. The applicant is also proposing to have 51-67 parking spaces in the "triangular
lot" located across the street and up to 30 display spaces located entirely within the 35
foot front yard setback area along Wayzata Blvd. He added that the impervious surface
area will increase slightly (69.9% to 74.8%) with this proposed amendment and the
lighting levels will exceed the maximum allowed under City Code across the site.
Baker asked how far the lighting level is above the City Code requirements. Zimmerman
stated that the Code requires lighting levels not to exceed a maximum of 20
footcandles; current levels are as high as 73 footcandles. Under the proposed new
lighting plan, the maximum levels would be 56.2, which is lower, but still above the
maximum allowed.
Nguyen Hoang, Baker and Associates, architect for the project, stated they realized that
for a comparable price they could construct a new building instead of the previous
proposal (Amendment #2) to remodel the existing Porsche building. He said the fagade
will be the same as their previous proposal except for the north fagade which they are
planning on modifying to match the other three sides of the building. He explained that
placing the display area in the front setback area along Wayzata Blvd. will allow for
better traffic flow and fire access, and will have pervious pavers as requested in their
previous proposal. He noted that other dealerships in the area have the same or smaller
front yard setback areas, with display cars parked there. He referred to the "triangular"
lot across the street and stated that they would like to use that area for employee
parking and he would like to have further conversations with staff about adding a
crosswalk in this location. He referred to the lighting levels and asked that their property
be grandfathered in because their properties are one PUD and it would be difficult to get
the lighting level down to 20 footcandles.
Segelbaum referred to the lighting in the "triangular" area and asked if the current light
poles extend beyond the height of the existing wall. Hoang said they are not planning on
modifying the lighting on the "triangular" lot. Segelbaum asked if they are planning on
re-doing the lighting on the entire site. Hoang said they want to focus on the west side
of the property with this new proposal. He said they are trying to make the lighting
consistent on the entire site and they've already reduced the lighting significantly. He
said eventually he thinks the site will be re-lit, but he doesn't want this new proposal to
look different than the rest of the development. Waldhauser asked Hoang if they are
adding new light poles. Hoang said they want to reuse the ones they have.
Segelbaum asked about the use of the existing Porsche building. Hoang said it will
probably be used as an expanded portion of Audi and Porsche, but it won't be used for
sales space. He added that there are strategic reasons they are leaving the existing
Porsche building where it is and building a new one.
Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission
June 9, 2014
Page 10
Segelbaum asked if the "triangular" parking lot can't be used for employee parking if
they will have enough spaces on the other parking lot for employees. Hoang said he
thinks the existing parking lot can be reconfigured to keep the employee parking on the
main parking lot.
Kluchka opened the public hearing. Seeing and hearing no one wishing to comment,
Kluchka closed the public hearing.
Waldhauser questioned condition #5 in the staff report regarding the relocation of
parking spaces along the front setback area. Zimmerman clarified that the proposal
indicates parking spaces and display spaces in the front yard setback, and he is
suggesting the parking spaces be relocated out of the front yard setback area.
Kluchka asked why staff is proposing that the lighting levels in the new construction
area be brought into conformance, but not the rest of the site. Zimmerman said he is
suggesting lighting levels on the proposed new portion of the site be brought into
conformance as a way to start addressing the issue. Baker agreed that the ambient
lighting has got to be brought down, and the issue needs to start being addressed.
Kluchka suggested adding a condition of approval that states that the applicant should
work on bringing the lighting level down, but he thinks it would look haphazard to force
the applicant to bring the lighting level down on just one section of the property. Cera
suggested giving the applicant a timeframe in which to bring their lighting levels down.
Segelbaum said he is not convinced that the "triangular" lot should not be used for
employee parking and he would like that decision to be left up to the applicant.
Waldhauser said there is also concern about noise in regard to the use of the
"triangular" lot. She said she thinks employees parking there could be more disruptive to
the neighbors. Grimes added that he is concerned about the safety of employees
crossing the street in that location.
MOVED by Baker to approve the applicant's request with all eight staff
recommendations as stated in the staff report. Cera suggested the motion be amended
to say that condition #6 requires lighting levels within the entire PUD be brought down
over a period of five years. Baker said he would be okay with that amended motion.
Waldhauser said she is not sure that condition #5 regarding the relocation of the parking
spaces within the front setback is possible. Segelbaum agreed, and stated that many
other lots in the area allow parking in the front setback area. Waldhauser asked if
Baker's motion could be amended to delete condition #5. Baker said he is okay with that
amendment.
The amended motion was seconded by Cera, and approved unanimously subject to the
following findings and conditions:
Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission
June 9, 2014
Page 11
Findings
1. The PUD plan is tailored to the specific characteristics of the site and achieves a
higher quality of site planning and design than generally expected under
conventional provisions of the ordinance.
2. The PUD plan preserves and protects substantial desirable portions of the site's
characteristics, open space and sensitive environmental features including steep
slopes, trees, scenic views, creeks, wetlands and open waters.
3. The PUD plan includes efficient and effective use (which includes preservation) of
the land.
4. The PUD Plan results in development compatible with adjacent uses and is
consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and redevelopment plans and goals.
5. The PUD plan is consistent with preserving and improving the general health, safety
and general welfare of the people of the City.
6. The PUD plan meets the PUD Intent and Purpose provision and all other PUD
ordinance provisions.
Conditions
1. The plans prepared by Baker Associates and submitted with the application on May
8, 2014, shall become a part of this approval.
2. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Fire
Department to Mark Grimes, Community Development Director, dated June 2, 2014,
shall become a part of this approval.
3. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Public
Works Department to Mark Grimes, Community Development Director, dated June
3, 2014, shall become a part of this approval.
4. Parking in the lot south of Wayzata Boulevard shall be limited to inventory vehicles.
Employee parking in this area will not be permitted.
5. The lighting plan shall be revised to bring the lighting levels of the entire site into
conformance with the requirements of the City's Outdoor Lighting Code (Section
11.73) within a period of five years.
6. All signage must meet the requirements of the City's Sign Code (Section 4.20).
7. This approval is subject to all other state, federal, and local ordinances, regulations,
or laws with authority over this development.
--Short Recess--
6. Reports on Meetings of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority, City
Council, Board of Zoning Appeals and other Meetings
No reports were given.
7. Other Business
Baker said he would appreciate and overview of the City's approach to zoning and he
would like to have a proactive approach to zoning. He asked how the City plans for a
diverse housing stock. Kluchka said he thinks the right time for that discussion is during
the Comprehensive Plan update process unless the City Council directs them
Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission
June 9, 2014
Page 12
differently. Council Member Snope stated that the City Council has had discussions
about starting the Comprehensive Plan updated process sooner.
Kluchka reported on the first Community Center Task Force meeting.
• Election of Officers and BZA Liaison
Segelbaum suggested that the Commissioners rotate turns being the BZA liaison. The
Commissioners agreed that the Vice Chair of the Planning Commission would be the
official BZA liaison, but that they would rotate going to the BZA meetings.
MOVED by Waldhauser, seconded by Baker and motion carried unanimously to
continue the current slate of officers for another year (Kluchka as Chair, Cera as Vice
Chair, Segelbaum as Secretary).
• Council Liaison Report
No report was given.
8. Adjournment
The meeting was adjourned at 9:54 pm.
Charles D. Segelbaum, Secretary Lisa Wittman, Administrative Assistant
GOLDEN VALLEY ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
Regular Meeting
Minutes
June 23, 2014
Present: Commissioners Jim Stremel, Tracy Anderson, Lynn Gitelis, Dawn
Hill, Debra Yahle, Tonia Galonska, Larry Johnson; Chantell Knauss,
Assistant City Manager; Eric Eckman, Public Works Specialist; and
Pat Schutrop, Administrative Assistant
1. Call to Order
Stremel called the meeting to order at 7:01 pm.
2. Approval of Regular Meeting Minutes — April 28, 2014
MOVED by Gitelis, seconded by Yahle, and the motion carried unanimously to
approve the minutes of the April 28, 2014 meetings.
Introduction of New Member— Larry Johnson
Larry taught communications and environment in the Minneapolis schools. The
other commissioners introduced themselves.
3. Natural Resource Management Plan
Eckman gave an update on the status of the plan. A proposal from SEH has
been received and will be going to City Council at their next meeting, for approval
to begin the work. If approved SEH staff will be at the next commission meeting
to begin the process of completing the final work plan. Tentatively planned is a
joint meeting with the Open Space and Rec. commission in November. The final
plan will be presented to City Council for approval.
The final version of the Guidelines for Open Spaces and Rights of Way was
reviewed. Gitelis feels that whenever possible the city should transfer title of an
open space instead of granting an easement. The guidelines will become a part
of the Natural Resource Management Plan.
4. Bottineau Plymouth Ave. Station Area Planning Representative
Stremel is no longer able to serve on the Station Area Planning committee for the
Plymouth station. Galonska will fill the position.
5. Program/Prosect Updates
Summary on-file. Additionally:
TMDL — Wirth Lake has been de-listed for phosphorus.
1/1 — The commission would like an update on any exceedance with the spring
rains.
6. Commission Member Council Reports
Hill attended the Bassett Creek Watershed Management tour
Gitelis reported on the Community Center Planning meeting. There are three
potential sites being reviewed.
Minutes of the Environmental Commission
June 23, 2014
Page 2 of 2
Gitelis also reported the first visioning meeting of the Minnesota Environmental
Parnership Group and The Clean Energy Jobs Group took place.
7. Other Business
Stremel presented the annual report to the City Council at a work session.
Council gave the commission a list of items to be addressed as time allows. One
of the items is the development of a State of the Environmental Annual Report.
This will include proposals for greener practices for the community at large.
Eckman asked the commissioners to brainstorm ideas and it will be discussed at
the next meeting. Once a list is created it will be discussed with Council.
8. Adiourn
MOVED by Hill, seconded by Yahle, and the motion carried to adjourn.
The meeting adjourned at 8:26 pm.
Pat Schutrop
Administrative Assistant
Minutes of a Regular Meeting of the
Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals
May 27, 2014
A regular meeting of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals was held on Tuesday,
May 27, 2014, at City Hall, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. Chair
Maxwell called the meeting to order at 7 pm.
Those present were Members Johnson, Maxwell, Nelson, and Planning Commission
Representatives Baker and Segelbaum. Also present were City Planner Jason Zimmerman,
Planning Intern Nick Olson and Administrative Assistant Lisa Wittman.
I. Approval of Minutes — March 25, 2014 Regular Meeting
MOVED by Nelson, seconded by Johnson and motion carried unanimously to approve the
March 25, 2014, minutes as submitted.
II. The Petition(s) are:
4400 Avondale Road
Diane and Thomas Moyer, Applicants
Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Single Family Zoning District, Subd.
11(A)(3)(A) Side Yard Setback Requirements
• 8 ft. off of the required 15 ft. to a distance of 7 ft. at its closest point to the
side yard (west) property line.
Purpose: To allow for the construction of a new addition on top of an existing 8 ft. x
16 ft. foundation.
Olson explained the applicant's request to construct a new bathroom addition on top of an
existing large concrete slab which functions as the roof of a garage addition built in the
past. He added that the garage addition received a variance in 1968 to be located 7 feet
from the side yard (west) property line.
Maxwell stated that the staff report refers to an existing shed and asked if there should be
any variance requests related to it. Olson stated that the applicant has said that they are
planning on removing the existing shed, so no variances will be necessary.
Olson showed the Board a survey of the property and a floor plan of the interior of the
house. He explained that they are proposing to construct the bathroom in the requested
location because the existing plumbing and HVAC is located in the garage which requires
the garage to be heated.
He added that locating plumbing and HVAC in a garage violates the City's building code
so by moving it within the proposed addition it will be brought into conformance with the
building code requirements.
Minutes of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals
May 27, 2014
Page 2
Johnson questioned if precedent will be set for the location of the proposed future
elevator. Olson said he didn't think any future elevator plans would require variances.
Segelbaum asked about the current use of the below ground garage space. He asked if it
is an extension of the garage or if it is storage space. Olson said his understanding is that
the space is used for storage.
Segelbaum asked what the City does when a building code violation is discovered. Olson
said that the house probably met the building code requirements when it was originally
constructed. Segelbaum asked what would happen if the homeowner wants to sell the
house. Zimmerman stated that the City does not have a point of sale inspection process.
Johnson asked for further explanation of the existing concrete slab. Olson explained that
the concrete slab acts as the roof of an addition underneath it and that the top of it is
slightly exposed.
Segelbaum noted that the variance granted in the past stated that the addition was
required to be landscaped and that no portion of it would be above ground. He asked if
that is a concern at this point. Olson said he didn't think so.
Segelbaum asked about the depth of the lot. Zimmerman stated that the depth of the lot is
200 feet so the rear yard setback would be 40 feet. Segelbaum asked if there are issues
with the grade of the property. Olson said there is a significant uphill grade in the rear
yard. Nelson agreed and said that the houses behind this one are quite a bit higher. She
added that this house does not have much of a rear yard before the incline of the hill
starts.
Thomas Moyer, Applicant, said he purchased the house in March. It was built in 1953 and
hasn't been updated since. He explained that the drain for the existing bathroom goes
straight through the garage space.
Nelson asked Moyer if he had an inspection done when he purchased the home. Moyer
said yes, and that nothing was said about the plumbing.
Baker asked about the walls between the house and garage and what kind of heat gets
into the garage.
Moyer stated that it is finely built, solid home. He said he was a toxicologist and he his
inclined to think that that Golden Valley would have some liability regarding the severe and
significant defect of this house. He said the air duct in the garage can be a source of
Carbon Monoxide going into the house. He added that there is not enough space in the
garage ceiling to get the ducts out of the garage. He said they plan to live in this house for
20 to 30 years and wheelchairs will not fit, which is another reason they are remodeling
the house. He stated that the variance granted in 1968 allowed for the widening of the
garage underground with a cement cap on top and that there is no way that cement cap
could be landscaped as was required at the time. He said he wants the HVAC system
terminated from the garage and wants to build a new structure on top of the garage
addition. He said they've considered other options including turning the second bedroom
Minutes of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals
May 27, 2014
Page 3
into a bathroom, but then the house would only have one bedroom which is not desirable.
He said another option would be to build in the back on the house but that is not a good
solution with the grade of the rear yard, so they would like to build the addition using the
existing foundation.
Baker stated that his house has a bathroom above the garage and the pipes go into the
garage and he has never had a problem with pipes freezing other than a time when the
water was left running. He questioned why this would be a problem for the applicant, but
not for him. Moyer said he can't fathom having plumbing in the garage. Nelson said she is
more concerned about the Carbon Monoxide issue.
Segelbaum asked the applicant if he has spoken with the neighbor next door. Moyer said
yes, and added that the neighbor told him about the past variance. Zimmerman stated that
he has also spoken with the neighbor and he has no problem with requested variance.
Moyer stated that the neighbor across the street said it will be an improvement. He
reiterated that they are proposing a fairly extensive renovation plan.
Johnson asked if a second floor addition would be a reasonable option. Moyer said no
because it would dramatically change the house and would not fit in with the rest of the
neighborhood.
Nelson said she thinks the applicant has been thorough in examining other alternatives
and this is really the only option, short of turning the house into a one-bedroom home. She
added that the HVAC situation and the topography of the lot are unique circumstances in
this case. Moyer reiterated that they have an existing foundation they want to use.
Mark Hauck, Bluestem Construction, representing the Applicant, stated one issue with the
house is the small doorways in the bathrooms. He explained that they don't want to build
an addition in the back yard because it would be really extensive and there would have to
be a lot of grading done. They also don't want to build a second story addition because it
would make the house too tall and it would not fit in with the neighborhood. He stated that
the plans they are proposing allows them to bypass the plumbing situation.
Maxwell opened the public hearing. Seeing and hearing no one wishing to comment,
Maxwell closed the public hearing.
Segelbaum said he is sympathetic to the homeowner and that the proposal he is making is
the least expensive option but he is having difficulty understanding the unique
circumstances and the justification for a variance for half of the side yard setback area. He
stated the plumbing issue is not a hot/cold supply, it is merely a drain and it seems the
HVAC vents could be capped which would fix the Carbon Monoxide issue. He said he
disagrees that the City would be liable for the plumbing/HVAC issues.
He added that the homeowner is already planning on re-grading the back yard and
although it would be more expensive, a new foundation could be dug at that time.
Baker agreed and stated that the rationale for the variance request is based on some
reasoning that doesn't correspond with his own experiences.
Minutes of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals
May 27, 2014
Page 4
Johnson referred to the four criteria the Board uses when considering variances. He
stated that the use is reasonable, the house has never been updated, which is unique, the
homeowner did not cause the plumbing/HVAC issues and the proposal won't alter the
character of the locality. He said he is inclined to support the requested variance and
thinks it is making a good use out of the existing concrete slab.
Nelson agreed and added that while she doesn't like to see encroachments this large into
a side yard setback area the Board has allowed larger variances in the past. She
reiterated that with the topography of this lot, there is not much else they can do.
Maxwell said he is in favor of the proposal. He said the uniqueness is not the
plumbing/HVAC issues; it is that the capped concrete foundation already exists and the
addition will be done a manner that is consistent with what's been done in the past.
MOVED by Nelson, seconded by Johnson and motion carried 3 to 2 to approve the
variance request for 8 ft. off of the required 15 ft. to a distance of 7 ft. at its closest point
to the side yard (west) property line to allow for the construction of a new addition on
top of an existing 8 ft. x 16 ft. foundation. Members Baker and Segelbaum voted no.
III. Other Business
Election of Officers
MOVED by Nelson, seconded by Segelbaum and motion carried unanimously elect
Johnson as Chair. Johnson accepted the nomination.
MOVED by Nelson, seconded by Segelbaum and motion carried unanimously elect
Maxwell as Vice Chair. Maxwell accepted the nomination.
IV. Adjournment
The meeting was adjourned at 7:50 pm.
George Maxwell, Chair Lisa Wittman, Administrative Assistant
city 0
goldenMEMORANDUM
valleyFinance Department
763-593-8013/763-593-8109 (fax)
Executive Summary For Action
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
August 6, 2014
Agenda Item
3. C. Approval of Requests for Beer and/or Wine at Brookview Park
Prepared By
Kris Luedke, City Clerk
Summary
As per City Code Section 10.83, Subd. 2 I. "No person shall possess, display, consume or use
alcoholic beverages on any City park property, unless permission is granted by the Council." As
part of the application process for a Facilities Use Permit to use the large and small picnic shelters
at Brookview Park the applicant has the option to pay an additional $25 to be able to serve beer
and/or wine. Attached is a list of the individuals and/or organizations who have requested that
option.
Attachments
• Beer and/or wine request list (1 page)
Recommended Action
Motion to approve the requests for beer and/or wine at Brookview Park as recommended by
staff.
BEER AND/OR WINE REQUEST LIST
INDIVIDUAL OR ORGANIZATION CC DATE
DATE TIME SHELTER APPROVED
Kelsey Anderson Wiley 08-07 5 pm - 10 pm large 08-06-14
Johanna Mangan 08-08 5 pm - 10 pm large 08-06-14
Jenny Rosas 08-09 5 pm - 10 pm large 08-06-14
John Mizera-Integara 08-13 5 pm - 10 pm small 08-06-14
Margaret Leppik 08-23 5 pm - 10 pm large 08-06-14
Melissa Bailey-Liesch Asso. 09-27 5 pm - 10 pm large 08-06-14
Gaima Bedell 08-31 5 pm - 10 pm small 08-06-14
Duane Wienke — Liquor Barrel 09-24 5 pm - 10 pm large 08-06-14
Peggy Mandel 08-15 5 pm - 10 pm large 08-06-14
Kelly Hoover— Questar 09-04 5 pm - 10 pm small 08-06-14
Nataly Hueta 09-06 5 pm - 10 pm small 08-06-14
Erin Taykir— Intergra 09-10 11 am to 4 pm large 08-06-14
Trisha Anderson 09-20 11 am to 4 pm small 08-06-14
city of �
MEMORANDUMgoideti,
adleyPolice Department
763-593-8079/763-593-8098 (fax)
Executive Summary For Action
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
Agenda Item
3. D. On-Sale, Sunday Sale Liquor License, change in ownership, Red Lobster Hospitality, LLC
d/b/a Red Lobster#0157.
Prepared By
Stacy A. Carlson, Chief of Police
Jim Roberts, Sergeant
Summary
Red Lobster Hospitality, LLC d/b/a Red Lobster#0157 located at 8900 Golden Valley Road had a
change in ownership of the business prompting a new license for the establishment.
Recommended Action
Motion to approve the change of ownership for licenses Red Lobster Hospitality, LLC d/b/a Red
Lobster#0157 for the 2014-2015 license term.
City Of
golden MEMORANDUM
valley Public Works Department
763-593-8030/763-593-3988 (fax)
Executive Summary For Action
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
August 6, 2014
Agenda Item
3. E. Second Consideration of Ordinance No. 526 - Amending Section 9.07 - Winter Parking
Regulations
Prepared By
Jeff Oliver, PE, City Engineer
Mark Ray, PE, Street Maintenance Supervisor
Summary
At the May 13, 2014 Council/Manager meeting, the City Council directed staff to develop and
City-wide parking restriction on public streets and alleys during the winter. The proposed
restriction was discussed at the July 8, 2014 Council/Manager meeting.
The proposed revisions to Golden Valley City Code, Chapter 9, Parking Regulations, Section 9.07,
Parking During Snow Plowing and Removal, clarify existing parking restrictions and implement
the new City-wide restriction from November 1 through March 31. Clarifications were made in
the section title to better reflect the seasonal provisions of the proposed code. The clarification in
Subdivision 1 addresses the fact that City Public Works crews may plow a street or alley multiple
times during a large snow event. Even though the street or alley may have been plowed,
continuing snow accumulation can result in the need to continue parking restrictions until crews
are able to make the final pass once the snow event has concluded.
Subdivision 3 is the new subdivision which will restrict public street and alley parking from
November 1 through March 31 from 12:00 midnight until 6:00 a.m. daily.
Staff does anticipate that special circumstances such as parties or family gatherings will result in
requests for temporary exemptions to the restrictions. These requests will be reviewed on a case-
by-case basis and reasonable temporary accommodations made where appropriate.
The City Council approved the ordinance on its first consideration on July 15, 2014. If the Council
adopts the ordinance on its second consideration, it will be effective upon publication.
Attachments
• Ordinance No. 526, 2nd Series, An Ordinance Amending the City Code relating to Section 9.07,
Winter Parking Regulations (1 page)
Recommended Action
Motion to adopt Ordinance No. 526, 2nd Series, An Ordinance Amending the City Code relating to
Section 9.07, Winter Parking Regulations on second consideration.
ORDINANCE NO. 526, 2 ND SERIES
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE
Amending Section 9.07, Winter Parking Regulations
The City Council for the City of Golden Valley hereby ordains as follows:
Section 1. City Code Section 9.07 is hereby amended by restating the title of
Section 9.07 in its entirety as follows:
Section 9.07 Winter Parking Regulations
Section 2. City Code Section 9.07, subd. 1 is hereby amended by restating the
title of Subdivision 1 in its entirety as follows:
Section 9.07 Subdivision 1 Snow Emergency
Section 3. City Code Section 9.07, subd. 1 is hereby amended by restating
Subdivision 1 in its entirety as follows:
Subdivision 1. After a snowfall of at least two (2) inches, parking is
prohibited on any public street or alley. Parking may not resume on any
such street or alley until the snow has stopped accumulating and the
same street or alley has been plowed with the snow removed to the curb
line or edge of the street or alley.
Section 4. City Code Section 9.07, subd. 3 is hereby added stating as follows
Subdivision 3. Public Street and Alley Parking Restrictions. Parking is
prohibited on any public street or alley from November 1 through March 31
from 12:00 midnight until 6:00 a.m. daily.
Adopted by the City Council this 6th day of August, 2014.
/s/Shepard M. Harris
Shepard M. Harris, Mayor
ATTEST.-
/s/
TTEST:/s/ Kristine A. Luedke
Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk
O t Y V
o i e 111
."
valley
City Administration/Council
763-593-8003/763-593-8109 (fax)
Executive Summary For Action
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
August 6, 2014
Agenda Item
3. F. Second Consideration of Ordinance Amendment - City Code Sections 2.30- 2.36 - City
Departments
Prepared By
Thomas D. Burt, City Manager
Summary
At the July 8 Council/Manager meeting, Council discussed that the City Code does not reflect the
current or most recent organizational structures. Section 2.30 gives the City Manager authority to
adopt, amend and revise a Table of Organization and to define the lines of authority. The City
Attorney and Consulting Attorney has advised rescinding City Code Sections 2.31 - 2.36 to
alleviate any future discrepancies between the actual organizational structure and the City Code.
In addition, to there was some confusion as to the interpretation of the language "by resolution"
in Section 2.30, Subdivision 3. They suggested amending Section 2.30 to make the language more
clear.
Lastly, throughout the City Code, specific departments, titles of department heads and other
positions are referenced and because the entire City Code is not routinely updated, staff
suggested changing these specific references to "..the City Manager or his/her designee."
The Council considered and adopted the first consideration of this ordinance at the July 15, 2014
Council meeting with the following amendment to Section 2.30 Subdivision 3:
Table of Organization and Areas of Responsibility
The City Council ff-ay shall by resolution establish, amend, and from time to time revise
the Departments of the City, in consultation with the City Manager. The City Manager
shall define areas of responsibility and lines of authority for each Department, all towards
the efficient organization and operation of the City.
If the Council adopts the ordinance on its second consideration, it will be effective upon
publication.
Attachments
• Ordinance No. 525, An Ordinance Amendment Relating to the Departments of the City (1
page)
Recommended Action
Motion to adopt Ordinance No. 525, An Ordinance Amending Sections of City Code relating to the
Departments of the City on second consideration.
ORDINANCE NO. 525, 2ND SERIES
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS OF CITY CODE
RELATING TO THE DEPARTMENTS OF THE CITY
WHEREAS, the City of Golden Valley is a Statutory "Plan B" city under Minnesota
law, vesting all administrative authority and responsibility in a City Manager;
WHEREAS, all Departments of the City are under the overall control of the City
Manager, who has the authority to adopt, amend and from time to time revise the
organization of City Departments;
WHEREAS, the Golden Valley City Code sets forth a specific administrative and
Department structure in Sections 2.31-2.36 that the City Manager may wish to change from
time to time to ensure the efficient organization of the City in accordance with the changing
needs, strategic plans, and current policies of the City;
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council for the City of Golden Valley hereby ordains
as follows:
Section 1. Sections 2.31 through 2.36, inclusive, of the Golden Valley City Code are
hereby rescinded in their entirety and are of no further force and effect.
Section 2. Section 2.30, Subdivision 3 of the Golden Valley City Code is changed to
read as follows (s#Fs text deleted; underlined text added):CHANGES FROM 7/15
MEETING ARE REFLECTED
Table of Organization and Areas of Responsibility
The City Council n4ay shall by resolution establish, amend, and from time to time
revise the Departments of the City, in consultation with the City Manager. The City
Manager shall define areas of responsibility and lines of authority for each
Department, all towards the efficient organization and operation of the City.
Section 3. References in the Golden Valley City Code to specific Departments of the
City, and to titles of Heads of Departments and other City officials, are changed to: ..."the
City Manager or his/her designee".
Section 4. This Ordinance shall take effect from and after its passage and
publication as required by law.
Adopted by the City Council this 6th day of August, 2014.
/s/Shepard M. Harris
Shepard M. Harris, Mayor
ATTEST:
/s/ Kristine A. Luedke
Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk
city 0
goldenl*. t4K MEMORANDUM
valley
Public Works Department
763-593-8030/763-593-3988 (fax)
Executive Summary For Action
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
August 6, 2014
Agenda Item
3. G. Authorize Construction Cooperative Agreement with Hennepin County for Brogger Circle
Drainage Improvements
Prepared By
Jeff Oliver, PE, City Engineer
R.J. Kakach, EIT, Engineer
Summary
Over the years, the homes along the east side of Cavell Avenue North just south of Medicine Lake
Road (CSAH 70) have been subject to backyard flooding during large storm events. The City
retained the consulting engineering firm, SEH, Inc., to conduct the Brogger Circle Drainage Study
in 2008 in response to these flood events. The current storm sewer network that conveys runoff
from Hennepin County, the City of Golden Valley, and the City of New Hope consists of a 24-inch
reinforced concrete pipe that crosses Medicine Lake Road just east of Boone Avenue. This storm
sewer connects to an existing 18-inch pipe, owned by the City of Golden Valley which runs south
through backyards that have been subject to flooding. This reduction in pipe sizing was identified
as a significant factor in the rear yard flooding.
The Brogger Circle Drainage Study proposed multiple alternatives to alleviate the backyard
drainage issues. The most cost-effective solution was determined to be installing larger storm
sewer pipe within Medicine Lake Road from Brogger Circle to Cavell Avenue North and
installation of new storm sewer within Cavell Avenue and Medley Lane downstream to the
discharge point in Medley Park. This larger, relocated pipe will eliminate the flow restriction that
exists between the existing pipes and significantly reduce the likelihood of backyard flooding. The
pipe upgrade was scheduled for a future Pavement Management Program project with costs
distributed between Golden Valley, New Hope, and Hennepin County; the three entities
contributing storm water runoff to the problem area.
However, Hennepin County will be completing an asphalt overlay project on Medicine Lake Road
in the fall of 2014 and has agreed to install the portion of the larger storm sewer pipe within
Medicine Lake Road as part of this project. Hennepin County has agreed to pay for this
construction, which is the equivalence of its portion of the estimated costs for the overall project,
based upon this agreement. The remaining storm sewer construction will occur as part of the
PMP project in this neighborhood, currently scheduled for 2016.
Hennepin County's cost participation responsibilities will be satisfied for all future storm sewer
improvements identified in the Brogger Circle Drainage Study as outlined in the cooperative
agreement. A certified resolution authorizing the cooperative agreement with Hennepin County
is required.
Attachments
• Project Area Map (1 page)
• Resolution Authorizing the Cooperative Agreement with Hennepin County for Storm Sewer
Improvements Necessary for the Brogger Circle Drainage Project (1 page)
• Hennepin County Cooperative Agreement No. PW 17-13-14 for County Administration of the
Project (5 pages)
Recommended Action
1. Motion to adopt the Resolution Authorizing the Cooperative Agreement with Hennepin
County for Storm Sewer Improvements Necessary for the Brogger Circle Drainage Project.
2. Motion to authorize the agreement with Hennepin County for Cooperative Agreement
No. PW 17-13-14 for Medicine Lake Road (CSAH 70) as part of County Project No. 1440.
i
i
j
t
`j
CITY OF NEW HOPE
------ --- --rnedir;n•e-take did-------
_
rlv
}q m rAtadley R O z
cc > N
QQ
j ''kedley cs� 25th Ave N
W
24th C
F' oro Medley Ln Ave N .2y
>
• Medley Rose o 24th Ave N Z o Jonellen Ln
O j ° Park q z a x
�4 ° c >" n O
if��elMh c J Wynnwood Rd
a i�ma `�},avtarr9 °+ 23rd Ave N x
g+ �w� Vsftey R,' z 23rd Ave N 23rd Ave N
R •b
�� '� s z Z z z
® j a C ti P a z gmnnetka H >
a �Ig1n Ptd a o > v yal8 z �Valdej, Q
�^ MatfnTr)
Rd W) 0 w m m m b4 pr 0 a s Y
H u ' > '= >
Unimproved- Duluth St d N
� � Du! Elgin PI 6 .c O Winnetka
z v er a Heights Dr
v
169 a' m la yb 3
z o 0/0 amf
a Y Q May a 'ql. band Rd
>
x c7 LL en Z
z z
Earl St Duluth St i °i
a
Golden Ridge N Q>
I a `
41ek Nature Area d d
z a
E Patsy Ln z Patsy Ln > y
v NaperSt C? - Q Julianne Ter o
N Q General Mills Research 0
3 d Nature Area 'o
tz
Wesley Or
= 7 Aquila
Olympia at a z
m 1Ninsda� Olympia St
Lakeview z sr
j Park 2 ��
m a y
j z z
> a
v >j c a m 4 Winsdaie St z m Wesley
a m
z a o w Park
,o rn M 119 Winsdale St Knoll Si Y
Q 0O N Z L
j S Knoll
b
Print Date: 7/24/2014 e
Location Map Sources.
-Hennepin County Surveyors Office for
Bro Circle re le Property Lines(2014)&Aerial Photography(2012).
gger -City of Golden Valley for all other layers.
Drainage Upgrade 0 400 800 1.8°0
Fee:
Resolution 14-60 August 6, 2014
Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH HENNEPIN
COUNTY FOR STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS NECESSARY FOR THE BROGGER
CIRCLE DRAINAGE PROJECT
WHEREAS, It is proposed to install new storm sewer on CSAH 70 (Medicine Lake
Road) from Brogger Circle to Cavell Avenue North to address local flooding issues in the
adjacent residential areas; and
WHEREAS, The City of Golden Valley has prepared construction plans and
specifications for this storm sewer construction; and
WHEREAS, Hennepin County has allocated 2014 funding for this project; and
WHEREAS, the 2014 construction of this storm sewer will satisfy Hennepin County's
financial participation for future storm sewer construction needed to resolve the residential
flooding; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council for the City of Golden
Valley to authorize the Cooperative Agreement with Hennepin County for storm sewer
improvements necessary as part of the Brogger Circle Drainage Project.
Shepard M. Harris, Mayor
ATTEST:
Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member
and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and
his signature attested by the City Clerk.
Agreement No.PW 17-13-14
County Project No. 1440
County State Aid Highway No. 70
City of Golden Valley
County of Hennepin
CONSTRUCTION COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT,Made and entered into this day of
,20 by and between the County of Hennepin,a body politic and
corporate under the laws of the State of Minnesota,hereinafter referred to as the "County",and the
City of Golden Valley, a body politic and corporate under the laws of the State of Minnesota,
hereinafter referred to as the"City".
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS,the City and the County have developed a project to improve the roadway storm
sewer drainage system on County State Aid Highway No. (CSAR) 70 (Medicine Lake Road)between
Cavell Avenue North and Brogger Circle as shown on the plans for County Project Number 1440,
hereinafter referred to as the"Project"; and
WHEREAS,the above described Project lies within the corporate limits of the City; and
WHEREAS,the City or its agents will be responsible to develop the plans and specifications for
the Project; and
WHEREAS,the County will enter into a contract for construction of the Project and will be
responsible for administering construction of the Project and; and
WHEREAS,the Project will be designed and constructed to accommodate the construction of a
future City storm sewer drainage improvement project south of CSAH 70;and
WHEREAS, it is contemplated that said work be carried out by the parties hereto under the
provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 162.17, Subdivision 1 and Section 471.59.
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED:
I
The County will advertise for bids for the work and construction of the Project,receive and open
- 1 - \IV 1.,.
Agreement No. PW 17-13-14
CSAH 70, C.P. 1440
bids pursuant to said advertisement and will enter into a contract with the successful bidder at the unit
prices specified in the bid of such bidder, according to law.
The contract will include the plans and specifications prepared by the City or its agents and
approved by the County. Said plans and specifications shall conform to Minnesota Department of
Transportation(Mn/DOT) Design Standards applicable to County State Aid Highways.
The County will administer the contract and inspect the construction of all the contract work
contemplated herewith. However,the City Engineer or designated representatives shall have the right,
as the work progresses,to enter upon the job site to make any inspections deemed necessary and shall
cooperate with the County Engineer and staff at their request to the extent necessary,but will have no
responsibility for the supervision of the work.
II
The Project will be designed and constructed to provide for the construction of a future City
storm sewer drainage improvement project south of CSAR 70. Specifically,the Project's storm sewer
drainage system will be of sufficient size and capacity to accommodate the anticipated storm sewer
drainage from said City project and will provide for a future connection at Cavell Avenue North.
It is understood by the parties that the County will not request City cost participation in the
Project. It further understood and agreed that the City will not request County cost participation in the
future City storm sewer drainage improvement project south of CSAH 70.
It is understood and agreed that the County or its agents will obtain a permit from the City for
the work included herein and that the permit will be granted at no cost to the County or its agent.
III
It is understood and agreed by upon completion of the Project and at its own cost and expense,
the County will retain ownership and maintenance responsibilities for the storm sewer catch basin
leads constructed as a part of this Project that are within or between the outermost curb lines of CSAH
70 as well as within the radius return limits of the intersecting municipal street. All other components
of the roadway storm sewer drainage system,constructed as a part of the Project,will become the
property of the City and must be maintained by the City. In the event, at any time in the future,the
storm water trunk line constructed as a part of this Project is reconditioned and/or replaced,the costs of
reconditioning and/or replacement will be apportioned among the County and City based upon the flow
that the facilities of each party contributes to the line being reconditioned or replaced.
IV
All records kept by the City and the County with respect to the Project shall be subject to
examination by the representatives of each party hereto.
-2 - '�
Agreement No. PW 17-13-14
CSAH 70,C.P. 1440
V
Each party agrees that it will be responsible for its own acts and the results thereof,to the extent
authorized by the law, and shall not be responsible for the acts of the other party and the results thereof.
The County's and the City's liability is governed by the provisions of Minnesota Statutes,Chapter 466.
The County and the City each warrant that they are able to comply with the aforementioned
indemnity requirements through an insurance or self-insurance program.
VI
The City agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the County, its officials,officers, agents,
volunteers and employees, from any liabilities, claims, causes of action,judgments,damages, losses,
costs or expenses, including,reasonable attorneys' fees,resulting directly or indirectly from any act or
omission of the City, its contractors, anyone directly or indirectly employed by them, and/or anyone for
whose acts and/or omissions they may be liable for related to the ownership,maintenance, existence,
restoration, repair or replacement of the improvements constructed as part of the Project. The City's
liability shall be governed by the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 466 or other applicable
law.
The County agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City,its officials, officers,
agents, volunteers, and employees from any liability, claims,causes of action,judgments,damages,
losses, costs,or expenses, including reasonable attorneys' fees,resulting directly or indirectly from any
act or omission of the County, its contractors,anyone directly or indirectly employed by them,and/or
anyone for whose acts and/or omissions they may be liable related to the ownership,maintenance,
existence, restoration,repair or replacement of the improvements constructed as part of the Project.
The County's liability shall be governed by the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 466 or other
applicable law.
VII
It is further agreed that any and all employees of the City and all other persons engaged by the
City in the performance of any work or services required or provided for herein to be performed by the
City shall not be considered employees of the County, and that any and all claims that may or might
arise under the Minnesota Economic Security Law or the Workers' Compensation Act of the State of
Minnesota on behalf of said employees while so engaged and any and all claims made by any third
parties as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of said employees while so engaged on any
of the work or services provided to be rendered herein shall in no way be the obligation or
responsibility of the County.
Also, any and all employees of the County and all other persons engaged by the County in the
performance of any work or services required or provided for herein to be performed by the County
-3 - W�-,
Agreement No. PW 17-13-14
CSAH 70, C.P. 1440
shall not be considered employees of the City, and that any and all claims that may or might arise under
the Minnesota Economic Security Law or the Workers'Compensation Act of the State of Minnesota on
behalf of said employees while so engaged and any and all claims made by any third parties as a
consequence of any act or omission on the part of said employees while so engaged on any of the work
or services provided to be rendered herein shall in no way be the obligation or responsibility of the
City.
VIII
In order to coordinate the services of the County with the activities of the City so as to
accomplish the purposes of this Agreement,the Hennepin County Highway Engineer or designated
representative shall manage this Agreement on behalf of the County and serve as liaison between the
County and the City.
In order to coordinate the services of the City with the activities of the County so as to
accomplish the purposes of this Agreement,the City Engineer or designated representative shall
manage this Agreement on behalf of the City and serve as liaison between the City and the County.
IX
It is understood and agreed that the entire Agreement between the parties is contained herein and
that this Agreement supersedes all oral agreements and negotiations between the parties relating to the
subject matter hereof. All items referred to in this Agreement are incorporated or attached and are
deemed to be part of this Agreement.
Any alterations, variations,modifications, or waivers of provisions of this Agreement shall only
be valid when they have been reduced to writing as an amendment to this Agreement signed by the
parties hereto.
X
The whereas clauses are incorporated herein and are hereby made a part of this Agreement.
XI
The provisions of Minnesota Statutes 181.59 and of any applicable local ordinance relating to
civil rights and discrimination and the Affirmative Action Policy statement of Hennepin County shall
be considered a part of this Agreement as though fully set forth herein.
(this space left intentionally blank)
-4- �1�.
Agreement No. PW 17-13-14
CSAR 70, C.P. 1440
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF,the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed
by their respective duly authorized officers as of the day and year fust above written.
CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY
(Seal) By:
Mayor
Date:
And:
Manager
Date:
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
ATTEST:
By: By:
Deputy/Clerk of the County Board Chair of its County Board
Date: Date:
APPROVED AS TO FORM: And:
County Administrator
BY Date:
Assiit County Attorney
/ , f And:
Date: 'I ` ` Assistant County Administrator,Public Works
Date:
APPROVED AS TO EXECUTION: RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL
By: By:
Assistant County Attorney Director, "Transportation Department
and County Highway Engineer
Date: Date:
- 5 - mak_
city 0 "'
olds MEMORANDUM
valley Finance Department
763-593-8013/763-593-8109(fax)
Executive Summary For Action
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
August 6, 2014
Agenda Item
3. H. Receipt of June 2014 Financial Reports
Prepared By
Sue Virnig, Finance Director
Summary
The monthly financial report provides a progress report of the following funds:
General Fund Operations
Conservation/Recycling Fund (Enterprise Fund)
Water and Sewer Utility Fund (Enterprise Fund)
Brookview Golf Course (Enterprise Fund)
Motor Vehicle Licensing (Enterprise Fund)
Storm Utility Fund (Enterprise Fund)
Equipment Replacement Fund (Capital Projects Fund)
General Fund Operations: As of June 2014, the City of Golden Valley uses $5,500,720 of fund
balance to balance the General Fund Budget.
Attachments
• June 2014 General Fund Financial Reports (2 pages)
• June 2014 Conservation/Recycling Fund (1 page)
• June 2014 Water and Sewer Utility Fund (1 page)
• June 2014 Brookview Golf Course (1 page)
• June 2014 Motor Vehicle Licensing (1 page)
• June 2014 Storm Utility Fund (1 page)
• June 2014 Equipment Replacement Fund (1 page)
Recommended Action
Motion to receive and file the June 2014 Financial Reports.
City of Golden Valley
Monthly Budget Report-General Fund Expenditures
June, 2014 (unaudited)
Over %
2014 June YTD (Under) Of Budget
Division Budget Actual Actual Budget Expend.
001 Council $294,840 13,332 139,904 ($154,936) 47.45%
003 City Manager 762,980 84,398 328,318 (434,662) 43.03%
004 Transfers Out 294,710 294,710 294,710 0 100.00% (1)
005 Admin. Services 1,676,280 135,465 708,009 (968,271) 42.24%
006 Legal 135,000 9,646 43,219 (91,781) 32.01% (2)
007 Risk Management 300,000 949 136,360 (163,640) 45.45%
oil General Gov't. Bldgs. 556,990 50,282 259,216 (297,774) 46.54%
016 Planning 346,195 36,264 164,949 (181,246) 47.65%
018 Inspections 651,545 72,312 300,442 (351,103) 46.11%
022 Police 5,202,175 530,866 2,404,566 (2,797,609) 46.22%
023 Fire 1,200,190 100,279 546,385 (653,805) 45.52%
035 Physical Dev Admin 334,315 59,202 184,578 (149,737) 55.21%
036 Engineering 691,880 45,383 241,844 (450,036) 34.95%
037 Streets 1,429,410 158,399 704,061 (725,349) 49.26%
065 Community Center 74,100 6,315 26,674 (47,426) 36.00%
066 Park & Rec. Admin. 679,345 72,720 316,340 (363,005) 46.57%
067 Park Maintenance 1,051,490 134,587 511,199 (540,291) 48.62%
068 Recreation Programs 502,830 58,138 142,413 (360,417) 28.32% (3)
TOTAL Expenditures $16,184,275 $1,863,247 $7,453,187 ($8,731,08§L_46.05%
(1)This transfer was made in June, 2014.
(2) Legal services are through May.
(3) Tennis program expenditures are lower due to contractual arrangement.
City of Golden Valley
Monthly Budget Report-General Fund Revenues
June, 2014
Percentage Of Year Completed 42.00%
Over %
2014 June YTD (Under) of Budget
Type Budget Actual Actual Budget Received
Ad Valorem Taxes $12,358,005 0 9,821 ($12,348,184) 0.08% (1)
Licenses 210,785 24,490 214,591 $3,806 101.81%
Permits 725,000 91,470 651,634 ($73,366) 89.88%
Federal Grants 0 0 7,500 $7,500
State Aid 255,390 0 5,453 ($249,937) 2.14% (2)
Hennepin County Aid 31,205 0 20,000 ($11,205) (3)
Charges For Services:
General Government 45,050 2,314 7,495 ($37,555) 16.64%
Public Safety 163,870 23,939 81,126 ($82,744) 49.51%
Public Works 141,000 19,877 73,257 ($67,743) 51.96%
Park& Rec 525,270 40,327 178,987 ($346,283) 34.08% (4)
Other Funds 981,500 59,665 393,659 ($587,841) 40.11%
Fines & Forfeitures 320,000 29,397 137,686 ($182,314) 43.03% (5)
Interest On Investments 100,000 0 0 ($100,000) 0.00% (6)
Miscellaneous Revenue 227,200 16,020 112,925 ($114,275) 49.70%
Transfers In 100,000 8,333 58,333 ($41,667) 58.33% (7)
TOTAL Revenue $16,184,275 $315,832 $1,952,467 ($14,231,808) 12.06%
Notes:
(1) Payments are received in July, December, and January.
(2) Police Training will be paid in August. Safe and Sober is billed on time spent.
(3)Violent Offenders Task Force is run by Hennepin County.
(4) Tennis progam was changed after budget was approved.
(5) Fines/Forfeitures are through May 2014.
(6) Investment income is allocated at year end.
(7)Transfers are monthly.
City of Golden Valley
Monthly Budget Report-Conservation/Recycling Enterprise Fund
June 2014 (unaudited)
Over
2014 June YTD (Under) %
Budget Actual Actual Budget Current
Revenue
Hennepin County Recycling Grant 56,500 0 0 (56,500) 0.00%
Recycling Charges 332,400 25,263 127,990 (204,410) 38.50% (3)
Miscellaneous Revenues 9,000 0 0 (9,000)
Interest on Investments 5,000 0 0 (5,000) 0.00% (1)
Total Revenue 402,900 25,263 127,990 (274,910) 31.77%
Expenses:
Recycling 447,135 20,854 198,465 (248,670) 44.39% (2)
Total Expenses 447,135 20,854 198,465 (248,670) 44.39%
(1) Interest Earnings are allocated at year-end.
(2) Recycling Services are through May.
(3) Quarterly charges for recycling went from $10 to$12 after April.
City of Golden Valley
Monthly Budget Report-Water and Sewer Utility Enterprise Fund
June, 2014(unaudited)
Over
2014 June YTD (Under) %
Budget Actual Actual Budget Current
Revenue
Water Charges 4,251,750 214,299 1,340,871 (2,910,879) 31.54%
Sewer Charges 3,300,970 231,529 1,370,544 (1,930,426) 41.52%
Meter Sales 5,000 3,987 6,997 1,997 139.94%
MCES Grant Program 118,730 0 0 (118,730)
Penalties 110,000 15,572 57,776 (52,224) 52.52%
Charges for Other Services 230,000 67,588 242,955 12,955 105.63% (1)
State Water Testing Fee Pass Through 45,000 3,419 19,023 (25,977) 42.27%
Certificate of Compliance 70,000 11,550 51,825 (18,175) 74.04%
Interest Earnings 35,000 0 0 (35,000) 0.00%
Total Revenue 8,166,450 547,944 3,089,991 (5,076,459) 37.84%
Expenses:
Utility Administration 1,377,255 343,985 793,938 (583,317) 57.65%
Sewer Maintenance 2,488,530 73,885 1,145,866 (1,342,664) 46.05%
Water Maintenance 4,363,650 269,775 1,923,461 (2,440,189) 44.08%
Total Expenses 8,229,435 687,645 3,863,265 (4,366,170) 46.94%
(1)This includes MCES Grant Program for residential reimbursements of$203,771.
City of Golden Valley
Monthly Budget Report- Brookview Golf Course Enterprise Fund (3)(4)
June, 2014(unaudited)
Over
2014 June YTD (Under) %
Budget Actual Actual Budget Current
Revenue
Green Fees 880,780 97,559 264,095 (616,685) 29.98%
Driving Range Fees 105,000 19,862 46,880 (58,120) 44.65%
Par 3 Fees 173,200 15,286 34,975 (138,225) 20.19%
Lawn Bowling 18,730 0 0 (18,730) 0.00%
Pro Shop Sales 78,500 10,471 26,587 (51,913) 33.87%
Pro Shop Rentals 227,800 25,681 65,205 (162,595) 28.62%
Concession Sales 215,200 34,126 75,850 (139,350) 35.25%
Other Revenue 70,155 3,712 75,131 4,976 107.09%
Interest Earnings 6,000 0 0 (6,000) 0.00% (1)
Less:Credit Card Charges/Sales Tax (35,000) (2,254) (2,678) 32,322 7.65%
Total Revenue 1,740,365 204,443 586,045 (1,154,320) 33.67%
Expenses:
Golf Operations 655,995 74,933 332,942 (323,053) 50.75% (2)
Course Maintenance 778,840 75,268 364,561 (414,279) 46.81%
Pro Shop 105,705 11,861 69,771 (35,934) 66.01%
Grill 177,910 28,682 79,459 (98,451) 44.66%
Driving Range 48,075 8,123 16,121 (31,954) 33.53%
Par 3 Course 3,500 4,138 6,425 2,925 183.57%
Lawn Bowling 141,965 39,478 63,582 (78,383) 44.79%
Total Expenses 1,911,990 242,483 932,861 (979,129) 48.79%
(1) Interest Earnings are allocated at year-end.
(2) Depreciation is allocated at year-end.
(3) Course opened April 9.
(4) Course closed on June 19 due to flooding. Reopened partially on June 25.
City of Golden Valley
Monthly Budget Report- Motor Vehicle Licensing Enterprise Fund
June 2014(unaudited)
Over
2014 June YTD (Under) %
Budget Actual Actual Budget Current
Revenue
Interest Earnings 3,800 0 0 (3,800) 0.00% (1)
Charges for Services 396,410 31,773 182,142 (214,268) 45.95%
Total Revenue 400,210 31,773 182,142 (218,068) 45.51%
Expenses:
Motor Vehicle Licensing 400,210 40,114 188,295 (211,915) 47.05%
Total Expenses 400,210 40,114 188,295 (211,915) 47.05%
(1) Interest Earnings are allocated at year-end.
2014 Equipment Replacement Fund(CIP)-Fund 5700
2014 June YTD
Budget Total Actual Remaining
Revenues:
Proceeds-Certificate of Indebtedness 750,000 740,100 747,600 (2,400)
Sale of Assets 35,000 25,436 48,136 13,136
Miscellaneous 0 0 56 56
Interest Earnings(allocated at year end) 17,394 0 0 (17,394)
Total Revenues 802,394 765,536 795,792 (6,602)
Expenditures:
Program# Project Number Project Name
5700 Bond Expenditures 0 9,390 11,740 (11,740)
5701 V&E-001 Marked Squad Cars(Police) 35,000 0 34,270 730
(1) 5702 V&E-002 Computers and Printers(Finance) 60,000 0 26,643 33,357
5703 V&E-003 Imaging System(Finance) 26,000 0 3,492 22,508
5712 V&E-012 Asphalt Paver(Street) 100,000 0 86,800 13,200
5733 V&E-019 Computer Servers 40,000 0 3,492 36,508
5742 V&E-069 Utility Tractor/Mower(Park) 25,000 25,303 25,303 (303)
V&E-071 Pickup Truck(Park) 45,000 0 0 45,000
5800 V&E-084 Self Contained Breathing Apparatus(Fire) 300,000 0 13,424 286,576
5786 V&E-089 Sidewalk/Maintenance Tractor(Park) 158,000 0 138,093 19,908
5783 V&E-101 Unmarked Police Vehicle(Police) 30,000 2,181 35,189 (5,189)
5797 V&E-111 Dump Truck(Street) 80,000 2,760 44,589 35,411
Total Expenditures 899,000 39,634 423,035 475,966
(1)Computers are replaced every 4-5 years and purchased throughout the year based on available time.
citv 0
Y 1.
M E M 0 R A N n !1 M
valley
Fire Department
763-593-8079/763-593-8098(fax)
Executive Summary For Action
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
August 6, 2014
Agenda Item
3. I. Sale of Self Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBA) and Related Equipment
Prepared By
John Crelly, Fire Chief
Summary
The 2014 Capital Improvement Program included purchasing new self-contained breathing
apparatus (SCBA) and related equipment. Fire Department staff is requesting authorization to sell
all used SCBA and related equipment. The SCBA equipment has been taken out of service since
receiving and placing in service the new SCBA. The equipment will be advertised in the League of
Minnesota Cities publication. Minnesota State Statute 471 requires that the City Council adopt a
resolution authorizing the sale of excess equipment.
Attachment
• Resolution authorizing sale of excess equipment (1 page)
Recommended Action
Motion to adopt resolution authorizing sale of excess equipment (self-contained breathing
apparatus and related equipment).
Resolution 14-61 August 6, 2014
Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SALE OF EXCESS EQUIPMENT
(SELF-CONTAINED BREATHING APPARATUS)
WHEREAS, the City of Golden Valley has determined the need to sell excess
equipment consisting of Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus; and
WHEREAS, the equipment has become excess as a result of purchasing new Self-
Contained Breathing Apparatus;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council for the City of Golden
Valley, Minnesota that:
1. Staff is authorized to sell the excess equipment consisting of used Self-
Contained Breathing Apparatus.
2. The equipment will be advertised and sold in compliance with all applicable
requirements.
Shepherd M. Harris, Mayor
ATTEST:
Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by
and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same.-
whereupon
ame:whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor
and his signature attested by the City Clerk.
city 0
14 .1
golden MEMORANDUM
valley Park and Recreation Department
763-512-2345/763-512-2344(fax)
MUMMER
Executive Summary For Action
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
August 6, 2014
Agenda Item
3. J. Authorizing Application to Minnesota Department of Transportation Community Roadside
Landscaping Partnership Program for Highway 55 Lilac Planting
Prepared By
Sandy Werts, Volunteer Coordinator
Summary
Since 2008, the City of Golden Valley has collaborated with the Minnesota Department of
Transportation (MNDOT) to support the Bridge Builder Lilac Project initiated by Dwight Townes.
Mr. Townes has asked for a sixth year of support and is working with MnDOT staff on a landscape
plan for the North side of Highway 55 east and west of Schaper Drive. If the Council supports
collaborating on the proposed 2014 Lilac Project, the Council should adopt the attached
resolution of support.
If approved by the City and State, the Lilac Project has proposed a September 27 planting date.
The Lilac Project is also seeking volunteers to maintain plantings from previous years.
Attachments
• Resolution Authorizing Application to MN DOT Community Roadside Landscaping Partnership
Program for Highway 55 Lilac Planting. (1 page)
Recommended Action
Motion to adopt Resolution Authorizing 2014 Application to Minnesota Department of
Transportation Community Roadside Landscaping Partnership Program for Highway 55 Lilac
Planting.
Resolution 14-62 August 6, 2014
Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING 2014 APPLICATION TO
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION COMMUNITY ROADSIDE
LANDSCAPING PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM FOR HIGHWAY 55 LILAC PLANTING
WHEREAS, Bridge Builder Dwight Townes, in cooperation with the Golden Valley
Connection Project and the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) Landscape
Partnership Program, has initiated a project to landscape the Trunk Highway 55 right-of-
way from Wirth Parkway to Trunk Highway 169 in Golden Valley; and
WHEREAS, the sixth phase of this project proposes to invite volunteers to
landscape the north side of TH 55 right-of-way in an area east and west of Schaper Drive
under the MnDOT Community Roadside Landscaping Partnership Program application
period ending July 31, 2014; and
WHEREAS, the support of the Golden Valley City Council and City staff is necessary
to apply for MnDOT funding and successfully implement this project.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Golden Valley will act as
sponsoring unit for the project identified as Highway 55 Lilac Planting, on state Trunk
Highway 55, to be conducted during the period of August through November, 2014.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that local neighborhoods, churches, civic groups and
businesses are hereby invited to send teams to help with the planting.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that City Manager Tom Burt is hereby authorized to
apply to the Minnesota Department of Transportation for funding for this project on behalf of
the City of Golden Valley and enter into a Cooperative Agreement with the Minnesota
Department of Transportation to undertake this project, if funded.
Shepard M. Harris, Mayor
ATTEST:
Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by
and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor
and his signature attested by the City Clerk.
: MEMORANDUM
valley Planning Department
763-593-8095/763-593-8109 (fax)
w W1
t
Executive Summary For Action
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
August 6, 2014
"60 Days" Deadline: August 18, 2014
"60 Days" Extension: October 17, 2014
Agenda Item
4. A. Public Hearing - Preliminary Plat Approval - Hanson Wood Shores - Property South of
Major/Noble Drives and West of Sweeney Lake
Prepared By
Jason Zimmerman, City Planner
Summary
George Wessin is seeking approval of a Preliminary Plat to allow for the subdivision of one parcel into
two.
At this time, the applicant is requesting this agenda item be tabled to the September 2, 2014, City
Council meeting. Since a legal notice was already published in the SunPost newspaper, the City
Council needs to open and close a public hearing for this item and table it to the September 2, 2014,
Council agenda.
Recommended Action
Motion to table this item to the September 2, 2014, City Council meeting.
City o .
golde' n'- W, MEMORANDUM
valley Planning Department
763-593-8095/763-593-8109 (fax)
Executive Summary For Action
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
August 6, 2014
"60 Days" Deadline: August 13, 2014
Agenda Item
4. B. Public Hearing - Preliminary PUD Plan for Trevilla Complex PUD No. 72, Amendment #2 -
7475 Country Club Drive - Albert Miller, Applicant
Prepared By
Jason Zimmerman, City Planner
Summary
Albert Miller is requesting an amendment to Trevilla Complex PUD No. 72 to expand the existing
vacant 60 unit senior living facility to a 114 unit assisted living and memory care facility. The PUD
contains two buildings on two lots - a 230 bed nursing home to the west and the 60 unit senior
living facility to the east. The original PUD was approved by the City Council on April 2, 1996. An
amendment to expand the senior living facility with two one-story additions was approved on
April 1, 1997.
The property is zoned "Institutional (1-3)" and is guided for long-term "Semi-Public Facility" use
on the General Land Use Plan map. The total area for the PUD is 4.54 acres; the total lot area for
the senior living facility is 1.98 acres. The PUD is bounded by Country Club Drive and Glenwood
Avenue to the north and office and high density residential uses to the south.
The proposed PUD amendment would allow the Applicant to expand the existing "L-shaped"
senior living facility both to the north and to the east and would reduce the size of the parking
lot. The proposed three story building expansion would increase the footprint by 7,856 square
feet from 15,672 square feet to 23,528 square feet. The building expansion would require a
reduction in the size of the parking area and in the number of parking spaces. Based on the 114
units proposed, 23 parking spaces are required under the Zoning Code. 28 parking space would
remain after the building expansion, meeting the minimum parking requirements.
The Planning Commission reviewed the proposal at their July 14 meeting and recommended
conditional approval.
City Code establishes standards for PUDs, which are laid out in the Staff report to the Planning
Commission. In addition, City Code establishes findings that must be made by the City when
creating a PUD. These findings are included in the City Council's recommended action.
Attachments
• Location Map (1 page)
• Applicant's Narrative (3 pages)
• Unapproved Planning Commission Minutes dated July 14, 2014 (3 pages)
• Memo to the Planning Commission dated July 14, 2014 (5 pages)
• Memo from Fire Department dated July 6, 2014 (1 page)
• Memo from Public Works Department dated July 8, 2014 (12 pages)
• Site Plans dated June 13, 2014 (14 pages)
Recommended Action
Motion to approve the Preliminary Plan for Trevilla Complex PUD No. 72, Amendment No. 2,
subject to the following conditions:
1. The plans prepared by Kass Wilson Architects and submitted with the application on June
13, 2014, shall become a part of this approval.
2. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Fire Department
to Mark Grimes, Community Development Director, dated July 6, 2014, shall become a part
of this approval.
3. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Public Works
Department to Mark Grimes, Community Development Director, dated July 8, 2014, shall
become a part of this approval.
4. The Applicant shall submit a lighting plan that meets the requirements of the City's Outdoor
Lighting Code (Section 11.73).
5. All signage must meet the requirements of the City's Sign Code (Section 4.20).
6. This approval is subject to all other state, federal, and local ordinances, regulations, or laws
with authority over this development.
In addition the Council makes the following findings pursuant to City Code Section 11.55, Subd.
5(E):
1. The PUD plan is tailored to the specific characteristics of the site and achieves a higher quality
of site planning and design than generally expected under conventional provisions of the
ordinance.
2. The PUD plan preserves and protects substantial desirable portions of the site's
characteristics, open space and sensitive environmental features including steep slopes,
trees, scenic views, creeks, wetlands and open waters.
3. The PUD plan includes efficient and effective use (which includes preservation) of the land.
4. The PUD plan results in development compatible with adjacent uses and is consistent with
the Comprehensive Plan and redevelopment plans and goals.
5. The PUD plan is consistent with preserving and improving the general health, safety and
general welfare of the people of the City.
6. The PUD plan meets the PUD Intent and Purpose provision and all other PUD ordinance
provisions.
>
• rs
i H
> i =
Q Id
ty Hal mpus a
c va�ley�d Subject Property:
7475 Country Club Drive
•• jj1
Country Club Dr
G/e"wo
Z • odgve
• d
• : ••••wfw•• • a m
state Na-'S g _ _• Y
•
.1
z
C
r Harold Ave
a
I ns Par
rs
Golden Valley Senior Living
Date: •
June 13, 2014
Reference:
Golden Valley Senior Living
Attention:
City of Golden Valley
Project Narrative
The proposed project is an addition and remodeling of the existing and vacant Country Villa
Senior Housing complex at 7445 Glenwood Drive in Golden Valley, Minnesota. The project
would transform the existing 60 unit senior housing complex into a 114 unit facility that would
provide both Assisted Living and Memory Care services. The scope of work includes both
interior and exterior Improvements.
The plan proposes to utilize the existing senior housing facility layout but transform certain
spaces to accommodate the facility's focus on enhanced assisted living and memory care
services. Also, an addition to the facility is necessary to meet the financial requirements of
operation. Although the existing building has much of the required infrastructure in place, a
60 unit building cannot generate the revenue needed for long term operation, thus its current
ownership has left it sitting vacant. Therefore, adding units to the existing building provides
an appropriate economy of scale for the proposed use.
Amenities to be incorporated are a library, spas, fitness center, activity spaces, additional
dining space and lounges. The existing building improvements include updates to finishes
and lighting, sprinkler system, and mechanical units. The addition will include assisted living
and memory care dwelling units with dedicated common spaces and a new elevator. On the
exterior, the new addition will mimic the look of the existing building. The existing building will
be evaluated and if required, repairs will be made to the building envelope. Existing planter
beds and will be refurbished and planted with new vegetation as outlined in the landscape
plans.
Expected Residents
The Golden Valley Senior Living facility aims to attract people needing memory care or
enhanced assisted living services at an intermediate cost when compared to other senior
living facilities. The facility will be attractive to people who want quality care and living but
cannot afford the premiums of a high end facility.
Existing Trees
Although the addition would require the demolition of some of the existing trees on the site,
we have made an effort to keep the larger and most established trees including a 54 inch
cottonwood on the south end of the site. Additionally, the Landscape Plan incorporates new
Page 1 of 3
Tel: 612.879.6000 2104 4th Ave. S.,Suite B, Minneapolis, MN 55404 www.kaaswilson.com
trees to replace the ones that are proposed to be removed. The site will also incorporate
stepped retaining walls along the east side to prevent current erosion issues. The Landscape
Plan incorporates many other plantings that enhance the site.
Parkins
The project calls to remove of a significant amount of asphalt parking lot due to a low
demand for parking stalls in an Assisted Living and Memory Care facility, thus improving on
site water quality. The only need for parking would be for employees and visitors. After the
proposed parking lot removal, there would be approximately 28 parking stalls' remaining
which is acceptable under the zoning code. According to the zoning for an assisted living
housing facility, one parking space is required for every 5 units/beds. Therefore, only 23
parking stalls are required and we are proposing 28.
Setback Requirements
According to the Institutional zoning district, the side and rear yard setbacks are required to
be 50'-0" from the property line with a 25' green buffer. In two instances, the existing
building infringes on this setback requirement and therefore, the addition would as well.
Along the west end of the site, the proposed addition does not get any closer to the property
line than the existing building. On the South end of the site, the addition gets a few feet
closer to the property line than the existing building but maintains a 25'-0" setback.
With one exception, all changes to the parking lot conform to the zoning requirements and
maintain the required 25'-0" landscaped buffer. However, the northern most portion of the
hammerhead turnaround infringes on the required setback and is unavoidable due to the size
requirements of the turnaround established by the Minnesota State fire code.
Lot Coverage Requirements
According to the Institutional zoning district, no buildings or structures shall occupy more than
25% of the area of the lot. After the proposed addition would add 7856 SF of lot coverage
to the existing building which occupies 15,672 SF of the site. Therefore, the lot coverage
after the addition would occupy approximately 27% of the 86,383 SF Lot. To help offset this
additional lot coverage, we are removing a significant amount of asphalt parking.
Additionally, we are proposing that any new paving be a pervious surface.
Staffing and Security
Patient safety and security are critical to the operation of a successful memory care facility.
The layout and operation of the facility including internal circulation, door hardware, and 24-
hour staffing will be situated to prevent patient walkaways. Memory care patients are locked
in and secluded to specific areas of the facility and cannot leave unless escorted by a staff
member. Also, residents in memory care will have access to the outside areas labeled as
"Memory Garden" on the plans. The security outdoors is similar to the interior, these outside
areas designated for memory care patients and will be locked and monitored to prevent
Page 2 of 3
Tel: 612.879.6000 2104 4th Ave. S., Suite B, Minneapolis, MN 55404 www.kaaswilson.com
walkaways. To put it simply, these residents are locked into certain areas of the facility and
cannot leave unless escorted by someone with approved access. Finally, The 24-hour staff
will have a protocol in place to get residents evacuated from these locked areas in the event
of a fire or other emergency.
The proposal today has many positive attributes to the existing structure and grounds. With
density comes quality: quality exterior materials, quality landscaping, quality interiors and
quality care.
Page 3 of 3
Tel: 612.879.6000 2104 4th Ave. S., Suite B, Minneapolis, MN 55404 www.kaaswilson.com
Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission
July 14, 2014
Page 10
4. Informal Public Hearing — Preliminary PUD Plan Review — Trevilla Complex,
PUD #72, Amendment #2
Applicant: Albert Miller
Address: 7475 Country Club Drive
Purpose: To convert the vacant 60-unit senior living facility into a 114-unit
assisted living and memory care facility.
Zimmerman referred to a site plan and explained the applicant's request to expand the
existing vacant senior living facility at 7475 Country Club Drive from 60 units to 114
units consisting of 77 assisted living units and 37 memory care units. He referred to the
parking plans and stated that the Zoning Code requires 23 parking spaces and the
applicant is proposing 28 parking spaces. He compared the differences between this
PUD proposal and the underlying zoning district.
Waldhauser asked about the amount of impervious surface. Zimmerman stated that lot
coverage is limited to 25% in the Zoning Code and that the applicant is proposing 27%
coverage.
Link Wilson, Architect for the project, referred to renderings of the proposed building
and said that they will be reducing much of the impervious surface by adding pervious
pavers. He said they will be working with the Bassett Creek Watershed Management
Commission on best practices and explained that the existing building size is not
economically viable.
Baker asked how long the building has been vacant. Wilson said he thinks it has been
vacant for three years.
Segelbaum asked if a market study was done and if it showed a need for this type of
proposal. Wilson said a market study has been done and there is certainly a need in this
market.
Waldhauser asked about the range of prices for this type of use. Wilson said the price
ranges haven't been set yet, but they will be below the national average cost for nursing
home care of $6,500 per month.
Kluchka opened the public hearing.
Edward Ratner, 115 Oregon Avenue South, said he has worked in a numer of types of
these facilities and the issue is cost. He stated that there isn't an adequate number of
affordable units for seniors and asked that a certain number of the units be made
affordable to help serve the community better.
Kate Hiebert, 7421 Glenwood Avenue, said she would like to commend the applicant for
engaging her and being transparent about their plans for the property and addressing
Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission
July 14, 2014
Page 11
her issues in their plans. She referred to past requests by Schuller's to construct an
outdoor patio and said she wants to be sure that a request by Schuller's is not in front of
the Planning Commission or City Council at this time and that the neighbors will be kept
informed in that regard.
Seeing and hearing no one else wishing to comment, Kluchka closed the public hearing.
Kluchka asked if the City can require any of the units to be affordable units. Grimes said
if assistance such as Tax Increment Financing, or Community Development Block Grant
funds were being used, the City could require that a certain percentage of the units be
affordable, but those funds are not being used in this case.
Albert Miller, Applicant, said that as a practice, they dedicate 10% of the units as
affordable. Segelbaum asked how that compares to other facilities. Miller stated that
Sunrise in Golden Valley and The Waters in Plymouth don't accept government funds at
all. Baker said Jones-Harrison in Minneapolis accepts government funds.
Segelbaum asked how this proposal relates to Schuller's. Grimes said it doesn't,
Schuller's has not submitted a proposal for a patio, and if they do, they would have to
come before the Planning Commission and the Council for review and approval.
Waldhauser said this sounds like a great project and that having a more affordable
option for residents is fabulous. She added that the variances aren't an issue in this
case to her because of where the existing building is already situated. Baker agreed
and said he was impressed that the applicant spoke with the neighbors.
MOVED by Cera, seconded by Segelbaum and motion carried unanimously to
recommend approval of the Preliminary PUD Plan for Trevilla Complex, PUD #72,
Amendment #2, subject to following findings and conditions:
Findings:
1. The PUD plan is tailored to the specific characteristics of the site and achieves a
higher quality of site planning and design than generally expected under
conventional provisions of the ordinance.
2. The PUD plan preserves and protects substantial desirable portions of the site's
characteristics, open space and sensitive environmental features including steep
slopes, trees, scenic views, creeks, wetlands, and open waters.
3. The PUD plan includes efficient and effective use (which includes preservation) of
the land.
4. The PUD Plan results in development compatible with adjacent uses and is
consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and redevelopment plans and goals.
5. The PUD plan is consistent with preserving and improving the general health, safety
and general welfare of the people of the City.
6. The PUD plan meets the PUD Intent and Purpose provision and all other PUD
ordinance provisions.
Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission
July 14, 2014
Page 12
Conditions:
1. The plans prepared by kass wilson architects and submitted with the application on
June 13, 2014, shall become a part of this approval.
2. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Fire
Department to Mark Grimes, Community Development Director, dated July 6, 2014,
shall become a part of this approval.
3. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Public
Works Department to Mark Grimes, Community Development Director, dated July 8,
2014, shall become a part of this approval.
4. The Applicant shall submit a lighting plan that meets the requirements of the City's
Outdoor Lighting Code (Section 11.73).
5. All signage must meet the requirements of the City's Sign Code (Section 4.20).
6. This approval is subject to all other state, federal, and local ordinances, regulations,
or laws with authority over this development.
Informal Public Hearing - Ge eral Land Use Plan Map Amendment—
305 and 345 Pennsylvania A enue South — CPAM-54
Ap icant: City of Golden V Iley
Addres s: 305 & 345 Pen sylvania Avenue South
Purpose: o change the esignation on the General Land Use Plan Map from
L Density R 'sidential to Medium Low Density Residential for the
pro rty at 305',Pennsylvania Ave. S. and from Mixed Use to Medium
Low D sity RE sidential for the property at 345 Pennsylvania Ave. S.
6. Informal Public Hearin Property Rezoning — 305 and 345 Pennsylvania
Avenue South —Z018-04
Applicant: Lake West Dev `lo' (pent, LLC
Addresses: 305 & 345-Pen `sylvan6 Avenue South
Purpose: To rezone the p�operty at 3 '6 Pennsylvania Ave. S. from Single
Farriily Residential (R-1) to Mecum Density Residential (R-3) and to
rezone the prop4oy at 345 PenAy,Ivania Avenue South from 1-394
Mixed Use to Medium Density Resrdential (R-3)
7. Informa)'Public Hearing — Pr lliminary PUD Plan Review — Laurel Ponds,
PUD #/117
/Address:
licant: Lake West Develo `ment, LLC
305 and 345 Penns Ivania Avenue South
City of
olden MEMORANDUM
DDM
Valle Planning Department
763-593-8095/763-593-8109(fax)
Date: July 14, 2014
To: Golden Valley Planning Commission
From: Jason Zimmerman, City Planner
Subject: Informal Public Hearing– Preliminary PUD Plan for Trevilla Complex PUD No. 72,
Amendment #2 – 7475 Country Club Drive –Albert Miller, Applicant
Background
Albert Miller is requesting an amendment to Trevilla Complex PUD No. 72 to expand the existing
vacant 60 unit senior living facility to a 114 unit assisted living and memory care facility. The PUD
contains two buildings on two lots—a 230 bed nursing home to the west and the 60 unit senior
living facility to the east. The original PUD was approved by the City Council on April 2, 1996. An
amendment to expand the senior living facility with two one-story additions was approved on
April 1, 1997.
The property is zoned "Institutional (1-3)" and is guided for long-term "Semi-Public Facility" use
on the General Land Use Plan map. The total area for the PUD is 4.54 acres; the total lot area for
the senior living facility is 1.98 acres. The PUD is bounded by Country Club Drive and Glenwood
Avenue to the north and office and high density residential uses to the south. The Applicant has a
signed purchase agreement for the property.
Summary of Proposal
The proposed PUD amendment would allow the Applicant to expand the existing "L-shaped"
senior living facility both to the north and to the east and would reduce the size of the parking
lot.
The proposed three story building expansion would increase the footprint by 7,856 square feet
from 15,672 square feet to 23,528 square feet.
The building expansion would require a reduction in the size of the parking area and in the
number of parking spaces. Under the Zoning Code, one parking space is required for every 5
units/beds in an assisted living facility. Based on the 114 units proposed, 23 parking spaces are
required. 28 parking space would remain after the building expansion, therefore meeting the
minimum parking requirements.
730 W
7710
C /
7740
L�- 441 _
7708
7704
a 7520
7600 0+
5 7700 ( 7501 !
1 7800 \t 7575
5 G 0\ '�
7701
605
,v `
Ctiuntr)f Club G1
1 5507345 R '
7505 Ah 9 7111
7475 'Tfj ,. try 11ry o v`ni
1A1 541 ' 7240 ti� ti
7812
7808 7700.52 531 1
550i °s �ry16, 7028
7804 7700
7802 530 {� 7215 0 �pg
7201
7800 521 1
:_% 520 <
71,00 N N1t
W
7650 0 0 511 t= 510 r 3 7151 7100
vh � N 0 N O
7500 ^ 501 7330 ` n m 7101
`A
Hwy 55 _Qlson hi�r��o
".
a4o 411 : "
RI 413 ;_.
424 + 7045
409
410 407— jZ410 7031
400 405 'c006
PUD 72 - Site Map
Proposed Building
The Applicant intends to add 54 units to the existing 60 unit building with three story expansions
that step down to two stories to the north and to the east. He would also renovate some portions
of the interior of building. Building amenities would include a library, spas, a fitness center,
activity spaces, additional dining space, and lounges. Improvements would be made to the
interior lighting, sprinkler system, and mechanical units. The memory care portion of the building
would include common space and a new elevator.
The exterior look and materials of the additions would match those of the existing building.
The existing building does not meet all setbacks as established by the underlying Institutional (1-3)
zoning district. The Zoning code calls for a 50 foot setback along the west property line with a 25
foot landscaped buffer. The building was constructed 12.5 feet from the property line; the north
addition would be constructed at the same distance. Similarly, the existing building is located
only 33 feet from the south property line; the east addition would reduce that distance to 25
feet.
Parking lots in the Institutional zoning district are required to provide a 25 foot landscaped buffer
along side yards; the proposed parking lot comes within 17 feet at its closet point. Finally, lot
coverage by buildings or structures is limited to 25% of the lot area in Institutional zoning
districts. With the additions, the lot coverage will increase to approximately 27%. To help address
the impacts of this increase in coverage, the Applicant is proposing to use pervious surfaces for
any new paving.
Proposed Parking
There are currently 35 parking spaces in the existing lot. The proposal would modify the eastern
end of the parking area through the expansion of the building and a redesign of the parking lot
shape. This would reduce the number of parking spaces to 28.
The Applicant has contacted the owner of the single family home to the northeast—most
impacted by the building expansion and parking lot reconfiguration—and has developed a
landscaping plan that attempts to provide additional screening for this property. 25 trees are
proposed to be removed; 42 are proposed to be planted.
Other Site Considerations
The Applicant has been asked to submit a lighting plan which will be reviewed for compliance
with the City's Outdoor Lighting ordinance prior to Final Plan approval.
New retaining walls will be constructed along the eastern edge of the parking lot to match an
existing retaining wall and help control erosion in that area.
Fenced gardens/courtyards will be located at either end of the new additions to provide secure
outdoor spaces for residents. Pervious pavers will be used in these courtyards.
Public Works and Fire Safety Considerations
As is standard practice for development proposals, plans for this proposal were reviewed by the
City's Public Works Department to ensure the site can be adequately served by public utilities and
that traffic issues are resolved. A memorandum from the Public Works Department that addresses
traffic management, sanitary sewer and water services, stormwater management, and tree
preservation and landscaping is attached.
The Fire Department reviewed this proposal to ensure that an adequate water supply is provided
and that adequate emergency vehicle access is achieved on the site. A memorandum from the Fire
Department that addresses fire hydrants and emergency vehicle access is attached.
Justification for Consideration as a PUD
The PUD process is an optional method of regulating land use in order to permit flexibility in uses
allowed, setbacks, height, parking requirements, and number of buildings on a lot. The City has
previously determined that this PUD meets the standards established in the City Code; Staff
believes that this application to amend the PUD is also consistent with these standards:
• Achieves a high quality of site planning, design, landscaping, and building materials which
are compatible with the existing and planned land uses.
• Encourages construction of affordable housing and a variety of housing types.
• Encourages creativity and flexibility in land development.
• Encourage efficient and effective use of land, open space, streets, utilities, and other public
facilities.
• Allow mixing land uses and assembly and development of land to form larger parcels.
• Encourage development in transitional areas which achieve compatibility with all adjacent
and nearby land uses.
• Achieve development consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
• Achieve development consistent with the City's redevelopment plans and goals.
In order to be approved as a PUD, the City must be able to make the following findings:
1. Quality Site Planning. The PUD plan is tailored to the specific characteristics of the site and
achieves a higher quality of site planning and design than generally expected under
conventional provisions of the ordinance.
2. Preservation. The PUD plan preserves and protects substantial desirable portions of the
site's characteristics, open space and sensitive environmental features including steep
slopes, trees, scenic views, creeks, wetlands, and open waters.
3. Efficient— Effective. The PUD plan includes efficient and effective use (which includes
preservation) of the land.
4. Compatibility. The PUD Plan results in development compatible with adjacent uses and is
consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and redevelopment plans and goals.
5. General Health. The PUD plan is consistent with preserving and improving the general
health, safety and general welfare of the people of the City.
6. Meets Requirements. The PUD plan meets the PUD Intent and Purpose provision and all
other PUD ordinance provisions.
Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of the Preliminary Plan for Trevilla Complex PUD No. 72, Amendment
No. 2, subject to the following conditions of approval:
1. The plans prepared by kass wilson architects and submitted with the application on June 13,
2014, shall become a part of this approval.
2. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Fire Department
to Mark Grimes, Community Development Director, dated July 6, 2014, shall become a part
of this approval.
3. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Public Works
Department to Mark Grimes, Community Development Director, dated July 8, 2014, shall
become a part of this approval.
4. The Applicant shall submit a lighting plan that meets the requirements of the City's Outdoor
Lighting Code (Section 11.73).
5. All signage must meet the requirements of the City's Sign Code (Section 4.20).
6. This approval is subject to all other state, federal, and local ordinances, regulations, or laws
with authority over this development.
Attachments
Location Map (1 page)
Memo from Fire Department dated July 6, 2014 (1 page)
Memo from Public Works Department dated July 8, 2014 (12 pages)
Applicant's Narrative (3 pages)
Site Plans (14 pages)
(A l' of VW
go ld("n **
vall Y Fire Department
763-593-8079 / 763-593-8098 (fax)
Date: July 7, 2014
To: Mark Grimes, Director of Community Development
From: John Crelly, Fire Chief
Subject: PUD Amendment #2 —7475 Country Club Drive—Golden Valley Senior Living
The Golden Valley Fire Department has reviewed PUD 72, Amendment #2 for the expansion of 7475
Country Club Drive submitted on June 13, 2014.
This PUD Amendment proposes the expansion of the building from 60 units to 114 units. To
accomplish this the building will be expanded on the north and south ends of the building. This
expansion will reduce the overall parking area. An approved "hammer head" style fire truck turn
around has been included in the design. Also,the fire protection water line on the north side of the
building and a fire hydrant located on the south end of the existing building will be relocated so as
to not conflict with the foundations of the new additions.
Overall this proposed addition to the building has no positive nor negative impact on the fire
protection features of this building or our ability to service this property.
As this project moves forward a code analysis of the proposed construction will be required. This
information will be used during the review of this project from a Code perspective (Building, Fire,
Electrical, Plumbing, and Mechanical Codes).
If you have any questions, please contact me at 763-593-8065 or by e-mail,
icrelly@goldenvalleymn.gov
city 0
oldent�V' MEMORANDUM
valley Public Works Department
763-593-8030/763-593-3988(fax)
Date: July 8, 2014
To: adark Grimes, Director of Planning and Development
From: Jeff Oliver, PE, City Engineer
Eric Eckman, Public Works S cialist
Subject: Preliminary Review— PUD 72 Amendment #2
Golden Valley Senior Living (7475 Country Club Drive)
Engineering staff has reviewed the plans, titled Golden Valley Senior Living, submitted by Albert
Miller (Developer) for the proposed expansion of the senior housing facility located at
7475 Country Club Drive. The subject property is part of the Trevilla Complex PUD and is bounded
by the Golden Valley Rehabilitation and Care Center to the west, Skyline Plaza Apartments to the
south, and single-family homes to the east. This memorandum discusses the issues identified
during the Engineering review that must be addressed prior to approval of the Final PUD Plans.
The comments contained in this review are based on the plans submitted to the City on
June 13, 2014.
Site Plan
The proposed project involves the remodeling and expansion of the existing senior housing
facility from 60 units to 114 units of assisted living and memory care services. The building
footprint will be expanded and paver courtyards added on both the north and south ends, and
the existing parking lot area will be reduced and reconfigured to accommodate emergency
vehicle access. The plans show an overall increase in impervious area with some tree removal.
New trees and landscaping are proposed as part of the project.
Traffic and Access Management
The primary access to the site is from Glenwood Avenue at the north end of the property. The
loading and delivery area is located in the southwest corner of the property with access through
the Golden Valley Rehabilitation Center parking lot. There are no changes proposed to the site
circulation within the PUD or the overall access to the City's street system. However, due to the
proposed increase in the number of housing units, a traffic study was conducted by the City's
Traffic Engineer dated May 13, 2014 (attached to this review).
G:\Developments-Private\Trevilla PUD 72_Amend ment_2014\Memos\PrelimPUD Review_070314_gvseniorliving.docx
The traffic study indicates that a total of 293 vehicle trips per day will be generated by the
proposed project, and that these trips will be spread throughout the day and have minimal
impact on the performance of the overall street system. During the morning and afternoon peak
hours, the trips generated by the assisted living facility would be relatively low. The proposed
development will have little impact to the existing traffic operations at nearby intersections.
Therefore, staff concludes that the City's street system in the vicinity of this project is adequate
to accommodate the vehicle trips generated by the proposed development, and no traffic
mitigation measures will be required.
Utility Plan
The plans show that portions of the existing water and sanitary sewer services will be removed or
relocated to accommodate the proposed building expansion. The City's water system that
provides service to this property has adequate capacity to accommodate the development. The
water mains, fire lines, and hydrants serving this facility are owned and maintained by the
Developer or property owner. This ownership begins at the shut-off valves located on Glenwood
Avenue and Country Club Drive and proceeds into the property. The City owns the shut-off valves
and the portion of the services between the valves and the City's main. A maintenance
agreement between the Developer/owner and the City, outlining ownership and maintenance
responsibility, must be executed before the issuance of building permits.
The proposed development is located upstream of sanitary sewer system capacity issues
identified in the sewersheds along the 1-394 corridor. The City's sanitary sewer system is
effectively at capacity in these locations and there is minimal capacity available for future
redevelopment along the 1-394 corridor and areas upstream unless inflow and infiltration can be
reduced throughout the sewersheds that are tributary to the capacity issues. Due to the
proposed increase in the number of housing units on this property, a wastewater study was
conducted by the City's consulting engineer dated March 14, 2014 (attached to this review).
The wastewater study indicates that, in addition to the capacity issues affecting the 1-394
corridor, there is also a capacity issue in the sanitary sewer system where it crosses under
Highway 55. However, the study suggests that, if inflow and infiltration into the sanitary sewer
system is reduced, the proposed expansion can be supported without upsizing the pipes under
Highway 55. In addition to the ongoing inflow and infiltration (1/1) programs, the City is putting
plans in place to reduce 1/1 in the City's portion of the sanitary sewer system in the 1-394 corridor
over the next several years. Therefore, with continued inflow and infiltration reduction efforts,
staff concludes that the existing wastewater system is adequate to accommodate the proposed
development. Additional development and redevelopment within the tributary sewershed should
be closely monitored to insure the capacity of the system is not exceeded prior to
implementation of further 1/1 mitigation reduction.
The Developer will be required to obtain Water and Sewer Permits, and possibly other permits,
for utility work on this site.
G:\Developments-Private\Trevilla PUD 72_Amendment_2014\Memos\PrelimPUDReview_070314_gvseniorliving.docx
The sanitary sewer service for this property must comply with the City's Inflow and Infiltration
(1/1) Ordinance. City records indicate the existing sewer service lateral was recently inspected and
it was determined that corrections are necessary. The Developer must perform the corrections
and obtain a Certificate of Inflow and Infiltration Compliance, or post an escrow with the City for
repair work, prior to Final PUD approval. Once the repairs and site work are completed, the
sewer lateral will need to be re-inspected by the City. A Certificate of 1/1 Compliance must be
obtained prior to occupancy of the building.
Stormwater Management
The proposed development is within the Sweeney Lake sub-watershed of the Bassett Creek
Watershed and is therefore subject to the review and comment of the Bassett Creek Watershed
Management Commission (BCWMC). The project plans indicate a land disturbance of 86,000
square feet and an increase of approximately 3,200 square feet of impervious surface area.
Therefore, permanent stormwater quality best management practices must be included to meet
the BCWMC requirements for developments.
Sweeney Lake is listed as an impaired water for nutrients (phosphorus) by the Minnesota
Pollution Control Agency. Review by the City and BCMWC will include an evaluation for
compliance with the Sweeney Lake Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Implementation Plan. The
Developer has proposed the installation of pervious pavers in the two courtyard areas, which
may assist in reducing the volume of runoff from the site. However, the City recommends that
the Developer explore additional opportunities for water quality treatment which will strive to
meet the goals and policies set forth in the TMDL. Stormwater calculations must be submitted as
part of the Final PUD plans.
All existing and proposed storm sewer facilities and stormwater quality treatment facilities that
are part of this development will be owned and maintained by the Developer or property owner.
The Developer or owner will be required to enter into a maintenance agreement with the City for
the storm sewer and storm water quality facilities installed as part of the development.
This development is subject to the City's Stormwater Management Ordinance. The City must
approve the Stormwater Management Plans prior to submittal to the BCWMC for review. In
addition, the project is subject to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's NPDES Construction
Storm Water Permit. A copy of this permit must be obtained by the Developer and provided to
the City, prior to issuance of any permits to begin work on site.
Tree Preservation Plan and Landscape Plan
This PUD Amendment is subject to the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance and Minimum
Landscape Standards. The plans submitted with this application include a Landscape and Tree
Preservation Plan. However, a tabulation of the significant trees proposed for removal and
replacement must also be submitted. The City Forester will review the plans in more detail, prior
to Final PUD Plan submittal, to determine if additional information is required.
G:\Developments-Private\Trevilla PUD 72_Amendment_2014\Memos\PrelimPUDReview_070314_gvseniorliving.docx
As a condition of approval of the Final PUD, the Developer will be required to post a financial
security as a guarantee that the landscaping will survive a two-year warranty period. Therefore,
the Developer must submit an estimate of the cost to furnish and install the landscape materials
along as part of the Final PUD plan submittal.
Summary and Recommendations
Engineering staff recommends approval of the Preliminary Plans for Golden Valley Senior Living
PUD 72 Amendment 2, subject to the comments contained in this review, summarized as follows:
1. A Certificate of Inflow and Infiltration Compliance must be obtained prior to occupancy of
the building.
2. The Developer must include permanent stormwater quality best management practices
which meet BCWMC requirements and the Sweeney Lake TMDL Implementation Plan, as
discussed in this review.
3. The Developer must enter into a Maintenance Agreement for the water main, hydrants,
storm sewer, and stormwater quality treatment facilities, as discussed in this review.
4. The Developer must submit a copy of the issued MPCA NPDES Construction Storm Water
permit prior to issuance of a City Stormwater Management permit.
5. The Developer must submit a tabulation of the significant trees proposed for removal and
replacement.
6. The Developer must submit a financial security for the landscaping on site, the amount of
which is to be determined as part of the Final PUD review.
7. The Developer must obtain permits from the City for Stormwater Management, Tree
Preservation, Sanitary Sewer, Water, Storm Sewer, and any other permits that may be
required for development of this site.
8. Subject to the review and comments of the Bassett Creek Watershed Management
Commission and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency.
Approval is also subject to the comments of the City Attorney, other City staff, and other
agencies. Please feel free to call the Engineering Office if you have any questions regarding this
matter.
C: Tom Burt, City Manager
Chantell Knuass, Assistant City Manager/Interim Physical Development Director
Bert Tracy, Public Works Maintenance Manager
Mitch Hoeft, Utilities Engineer
Mark Ray, Street Maintenance Supervisor
Al Lundstrom, Park Maintenance Supervisor and City Forester
Kelley Janes, Utilities Supervisor
Joe Fox, Water Resources Engineer
John Crelly, Fire Chief
Jason Zimmerman, City Planner
Jerry Frevel, Building Official
G:\Developments-Private\Trevilla PUD 72_Amendment_2014\Memos\PrelimPUDReview_070314_gvseniorliving.docx
J
SEH
Building Better World MEMORANDUM
for All off Us®
TO: Jeannine Clancy, Director of Public Works
City of Golden Valley
FROM: Mike Kotila, PE
Chad Jorgensen, EIT
DATE: May 13, 2014
RE: Country Villa Assisted Living Center Traffic Study
SEH No. GOLDV 127978 14.00
This technical memorandum summarizes findings and recommendations related to a traffic impact study
performed to evaluate the proposed expansion of the existing Country Villa Assisted Living Center
located on Glenwood Avenue just south of Country Club Drive in Golden Valley, MN. As supported by
detailed analysis results provided in this memorandum, the proposed expansion would have minimal
impact on traffic operations on local streets in the immediate area and no traffic mitigation measures
would be required.
Existing Conditions
The existing Country Villa Assisted Living Center building has an existing capacity of 60 beds; however
the facility was not occupied at the time of this study. The existing driveway entrance and exit to the
assisted living center parking lot is located just south of the intersection of Country Club Drive and
Glenwood Avenue.
The existing intersection of Glenwood Avenue and Country Club Drive is controlled by a stop sign on the
northbound (Glenwood Avenue) approach while eastbound and westbound Country Club Drive operate
without intersection traffic control. The speed limit on Glenwood Avenue and on Country Club Drive is 30
mph. The next intersection west of Glenwood Avenue on Country Club Drive is at Rhode Island Avenue
where Country Club Drive is controlled be a stop sign and Rhode Island operates without control.
Easterly of the site along Glenwood Avenue intersects with Kelly Drive which provides right turns access
to and from westbound TH 55.
Traffic Data Collection
Existing AM and PM peak hour traffic turning movement counts were collected at the intersections of
Country Club Drive/Glenwood Avenue and Country Club Drive/Rhode Island Avenue. The AM peak hour
was determined to be from 7:30 AM to 8:30 AM and the PM peak hour was determined to be from 4:30
PM to 5:30 PM. The existing peak hour turning movement counts are shown in Table 1 below.
Engineers I Architects I Planners I Scientists
Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc.,10901 Red Circle Drive,Suite 300,Minnetonka,MN 55343-9302
SEH is 100%employee-owned I sehinc.com 1 952.912.2600 1 800.734.6757 1 888.908.8166 fax
Country Villa Assisted Living Center Traffic Study
May 13, 2014
Page 2
Table 1: Existing Peak Hour Intersection Volume
Country Peak NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR TOTAL
Club Dr.@ Hour
Glenwood AM 11 1 39 8 0 35 94
Ave. PM 17 1 35 24 0 117 194
Rhode AM 101 1 32 1 31 1 207 1 20 1 3 23 19 1 21 457
Island Ave. PM 206 1 23 1 30 1 197 59 1 9 56 93 79 752
Trip Generation
Currently the Country Villa Assisted Living Center is not occupied so the existing traffic counts did not
include site generated traffic. Estimates for potential trip generation for the existing site and for the
proposed expansion have been developed using the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE), Trip
Generation Manual, 91h Edition. Trip totals were generated for the existing 60 bed facility and for the
proposed expansion of 50 beds. This type of facility would not typically generate high traffic demands
during peak periods on the adjacent street system.
Table 2 summarizes the trip generation estimates for the existing assisted living center and the proposed
expansion for daily,AM peak hour and PM peak hour demands.
Table 2: Trip Generation
Site Area Trip Daily AM PM
(Code-Land Use Generation Units
Description Size Beds Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total
254-Assisted 60 Beds 80 80 160 7 4 11 10 11 21
Living Existing
254-Assisted 50 Beds 67 67 134 6 3 9 8 9 17
Living Development
TOTAL Trip
Generation 110 Beds 146 146 292 13 7 20 18 20 38
Trip Distribution
Development generated traffic was distributed to the adjacent street network based on findings and
general routing assumptions for previous traffic studies performed by SEH in the area. Trips were
distributed as follows: 25%to/from the west on TH 55; 45%to/from the east on TH 55; 10% to/from the
north on Winnetka Avenue; 12%to/from the south on Winnetka Avenue; and 8%to/from the northeast
along Golden Valley Road.
Traffic Operations
Intersection operations were evaluated for existing conditions and for proposed expansion of the assisted
living center. FHWA Highway Capacity Software(HCS)was used to evaluate traffic operations at nearby
stop sign controlled intersections—especially those that may incur delays for left turning traffic. Based on
the relatively low trip generation magnitudes, impacts to additional intersections in the area serving right
turn demands or operating under signalized control is not warranted.
The two intersections evaluated using HCS include:
• Country Club Drive at Glenwood Avenue(Glenwood Avenue is stop sign controlled)
• Country Club Drive at Rhode Island Avenue (Country Club Drive is stop sign controlled)
Country Villa Assisted Living Center Traffic Study
May 13, 2014
Page 3
Table 3 shows the results of the existing intersection operations analysis. All movements at both
intersections in the existing conditions operate at a LOS C or better in both peak hours with minimal
delay. It should be noted that under the HCS two-way stop control analysis methodology, the mainline
through and right turn movements do not yield and therefore incur no delay through the intersection.
Therefore, no delay or levels of service (LOS)values are provided for these traffic movements.
Table 3: Existing Intersection Traffic Operations
Peak Approach Volumes Dela (s)/LOS
Hour Intersection Direction L T R Total Left Through Right Approach
Country Club Drive @ NB 11 0 1 12 9/A 9/A 9/A 9/A
Glenwood Avenue EB 0 39 8 47
AM
WB 1 0 35 0 35 7.3/A 7.3/A
NB 0 101 32 133
Country Club Drive @ SB 31 207 0 238 7.7/A
Rhode Island Avenue EB 20 3 23 46 12.3/B 12.3/B 11 /B
WB 19 0 21 40 12.2/B 9.2/A 10.5/B
Country Club Drive @ NB 17 0 1 18 9.6/A 9.6/A 9.6/A 9.6/A
Glenwood Avenue EB 0 35 24 59
PM
WB 0 117 0 117 7.4/A 7.4/A
NB 0 206 23 229
Country Club Drive @ SB 30 197 0 227 7.9/A
Rhode Island Avenue EB 59 9 56 124 15.2/C 9.8/A 12.9/B
WB 93 0 79 172 15.4/C 10.2/B 131B
Table 4 shows analysis results for the proposed expansion of the assisted living center. All movements at
both intersections operate at a LOS C or better in both peak hours with minimal delay. Due to the low
traffic demands of the proposed development, traffic impacts are minor. It is anticipated that during the
PM peak hour, only 20 additional vehicles would be added to the outbound roadway network. The
existing intersections have ample capacity to handle the increase in traffic demands.
Table 4: Proposed Development Traffic Operations
Peak Intersection Approach Volumes Delay(s)/LOS
Direction L T R Total Left Throu h Right Approach
Country Club Drive @ NB 15 0 2 17 9/A 9/A 9/A 9/A
Glenwood Avenue EB 0 39 17 56
AM
WB 2 35 0 37 7.4/A 7.4/A
NB 0 101 38 139
Country Club Drive @ SB 33 207 0 240 7.7/A
Rhode Island Avenue EB 20 3 23 46 12.5/B 12.5/B 11.2/B
WB 22 0 22 44 12.5/B 9.2/A 10.8/B
Country Club Drive @ NB 29 0 4 33 11.8/B 11.8/B 11.8/B 11.8/B
Glenwood Avenue EB 0 35 36 71
PM
WB 3 117 0 120 7.7/A 7.7/A
NB 0 206 32 238
Country Club Drive @ SB 33 197 0 230 16/C
Rhode Island Avenue EB 59 9 56 124 15.5/C 9.8/A 13.2/B
WB 102 0 83 184 16/C 10.3/6 1 13.4/B
Country Villa Assisted Living Center Traffic Study
May 13, 2014
Page 4
Conclusions
The proposed development would expand the existing 60 bed, assisted living facility by 50 beds for a total
of 110 beds.
The existing facility is not currently occupied. If it were occupied, trip generation estimates indicate that it
would generate approximately 160 daily trips. The proposed expansion would generate an additional 133
daily trips resulting in a total of 293 vehicle trips per day. Since the current site is not in use, the street
network would need to serve an increase of 293 trips per day compared to existing conditions. These
trips would include both inbound and outbound traffic spread throughout the day and will have minimal
impact on performance of the overall street system.
During the morning and afternoon peak hours on the adjacent streets, trips generated by the assisted
living facility would be relatively low. During the PM peak hour, only 38 trips to and from the expanded
building would be expected (18 arriving and 20 departing).
Trips generated by this change will have only a minor impact to traffic operations at existing intersections
in the area. The two existing stop sign controlled intersections on Country Club Drive(Glenwood Avenue
and Rhode Island Avenue)have enough existing capacity to serve the increase in traffic demands. The
proposed development will have little impact to the existing traffic operations at these intersections and no
traffic mitigation measures will be needed.
c: Jeff Oliver, City Engineer
Eric Eckman, Public Works Specialist
p:\fj\g\goldv\127978\study\country club drive assisted living study\assisted living memo 051314.docx
-A
SEH MEMORANDUM
TO: Jeff Oliver,P.E.
FROM: Kirby Van Note
DATE: March 14,2014
RE: Sanitary Sewer Capacity Analysis: Assisted Living Facility Expansion
SEH No. GOLDV 127413 14.00
Introduction
In May 2014, Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. completed an analysis of the sanitary sewer system in the
vicinity of Country Club Drive and Glenwood Avenue incorporating future expansion of the assisted
living facility in that area.An InfoSWMM sanitary sewer model was used to determine the capacity of the
system with new development.
System Analysis
The system was analyzed with the addition of 50 beds to the assisted living facility at the intersection of
Country Club Drive and Glenwood Avenue. The flows from that area go south and cross Highway 55,as
shown in Figure 3. The proposed addition results in an increase of 9,250 gallons of flow per day.
Table 1: Proposed Flow Increase
Unit Beds Flow/Unit* d Additional Flow d
50 185 1 9,250
*Flow Rate obtained from Wastewater Collection System Modeling and Design:First Edition by Haestad Methods
Two scenarios were modeled: the Peak Metered Flow and Assisted Living Facility Expansion scenario
and the 2030 Flow(using MCES Peaking Factors)and Assisted Living Facility Expansion scenario,
shown in Figures 1 and 2. The Peak Metered scenario shows a depth over diameter(d/D)at the pipe
crossing TH 55 of 0.814. This is at the beginning of the threshold for which corrective action is required.
The 2030 Flow scenario (using MCES Peaking Factors)yields a d/D of 0.624 which is adequate.
In both Figures 1 and 2,the pipes where d/D has increased as a result of the Assisted Living Facility
Expansion have been called out and the d/D ratio is provided on the figure. If not marked,the d/D ratios
stayed in a similar range as before the expansion.
In the Peak Metered Flow scenario,the MCES Golden Valley interceptor has pipes that are above the
threshold for corrective action. The d/D limits do not change as a result of the Assisted Living Facility
Expansion.The capacity strain on those pipes will be alleviated as a result of the MCES GV-461 Relief
Interceptor and Lift Station.
Conclusion
If 1/1 is reduced to the MCES Allowable Peaking Factor,the expansion at the Assisted Living Facility
does not create d/D ratios above the allowable threshold of 0.8.
Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc.,3535 Vadnais Center Drive,St.Paul,MN 55110-5196
SEH is an equal opportunity employer I www.sehinc.com 1 651.490.2000 1 800.325.2055 1 888.908.8166 fax
Sanitary Sewer Capacity Analysis:Assisted Living Facility Expansion
March 14,2014
Page 2
Options
Two options exist to allow for the proposed expansion of the assisted living facility:
1. Reduce Inflow and Infiltration
2. Upsize the Sanitary Sewer crossing Highway 55
Recommendation
SEH recommends continued efforts to reduce I/I to support expansion of the assisted living facility and
future development.In both scenarios,the pipe across Highway 55 is near the allowable capacity.
Reductions in I/I will lower peak flow through those pipes and reduce capacity constraints, allowing for
future development.
ELS
Attachments
s:\fj \gol&\common\122355 sanitary model 2012\tech m=o022714.docx
Legend
Flow Path
If
Living Facility Expansion Assisted Aleal Conduit
Depth over Diameter(d/D)
L
-0.60
d1D=0..814 L d0lD�=] s maysF _W Less than 0.6
din=n 6 Lj 0.6-0.8
_F
A— MCES GV461
Greater than 0.8
_T—T Interceptor
Z
co
Ilk —F
1,-if Ave__
•
_J
WWI"BW S Fmb"Rd WaY�W Blvd
1-3 0 500 1,000
tai
Feet
Rojo :GOLDV 122355
RuIt D.W 511=014
Golden Valley Sanitary Sewer System Peak Metered Flow Figure
IF11— P- and Assisted Living
SEH Peak Metered Flow and Assisted Living Facility Expansion Facility Expansion
e
Legend
Flow Path
l i I Assisted Living Facility Expansio7ea I _ S Conduit
_ 61 l
L4- s I= Depth over Diameter(d/D)
-.,
<r r
smis Hwy ss J C is
sF age tl s � — Less than 0.6
i �, �d myrsl HWy`'Froraa ,¢
~ 1G
0.6-0.8
f,
n T T Pl MCES GV-461 Interceptor _( � Greater than 0.8
i
VMYY7ZB*ABA48Fn'xMep�Rd
I�0 waY+ala BHtl P __
}ems le Otitp47 0 500 1,000
tl AEi� EM
O ,.J� ' —•-F� LLJI� 101119=Feet
d LLJJ 4 7 I I
Pr.jedGOLDV 122365 LL11JJ
a a` NmtDaf 5/13/2014 Golden Valley Sanitary Sewer System
2030 Flow and
_ Figure
Assisted Living
S
EH o� µM1� 2030 Flow(with MCES Peaking Factor)and Assisted Living Facility Expansion Facility
Expansion 2
GOLDEN VALLEY
Sheet Sheet List
Number Sheet Name
AO Title Page7 `
SENIOR LIVING
A0.1 Area Map
A0.2 Bird's Eye Views
A1.0 Site Plan 7445 Glenwood Ave. Golden Valley, Minnesota
A1.1 Level 1 Floor Plan
A1.2 Level 2 Floor Plan
A1.3 Level 3 Floor Plan
A2.1 Exterior Elevations
A2.2 Exterior Elevations
CO Site Survey
C1 Removals Plan
C2 Site Plan
C3 Grading&Utility Plan
L1
Landscape Plan
y
Li
r err i
1
r
F
:x
c
k
lY
� f
�] rp n _
,
.......
Ak
_ �1J
/ TAk kaas GOLDEN VALLEY SENIORLIVING � !
Title
wilson . . . -
e `t. -. ��`: ;� �:: �♦ +tri, .f�' .. ,.��,....-�^.4.�ry.. � �
n
+ ; kill
'144NMUT W,
IF
1
d
�. .
fir" ♦ xg P
�pi
10
t
r.
C�
_ m
o
� r
to �
a
.. �§son'ti++p
� StosNC�'
~ r WJ# v
aas GOLDEN VALLEY SENIOR LIVING AO. 1
wilsan Area Map
architects GOLDEN VALLEY, MN
N
' .
•
• °n.:�:� .. a, II -.. „_a.�'3'.' A'n' .^..rkfim,,4�asXbfb.p � �ry` � _,..
8
»
LU
3x•
... ,-
JLr
�i
101
Al
a i
fes-
}
w
. 1
n y
i
„ u
k � _
,
IRsLij
• _ .,
P e S-
LU
•
r
a 9F.•
,
v`
'
(D
. V7
know
a s
"te
e
i= �
COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE
r a
\a
MEMORY OOD,,
GARDEN
12'-6 7/8"
r�
EXTENTS OF
EXISTING
BUILDING
e ems!
a4.
BIKE RACKS a'
20'-0"
- - - - - a.• .. �� � A28:On
250"
SERVICE DRIVE j I
EXTENTS OF ;- :,•,� P R39 65116
EXISTING I
BUILDING _
- _ ASSISTED
LIVING-
COURTYARD
Site Plan
. . OR LIVING Al .0_ 1!
wilson
�, +, GOLDEN VALLEY, MN Site Plan-Ji
I - FLOOR PLAN LEGEND
MEMORY AL
Ell KITCHEN El MEMORY CARE COMMONS
I GARDEN
M MC AL COMMONS LIBRARY ■ STAFF/OFF.
20 20
*--a
F13 DINING ROOM � LOBBY ❑ STAIR
I
M
M -- �11
14
MEMORY ELEVATOR ❑MC
CARE /
COMMONS
FITNESS MECH
2 M M
A2.2 F]
S3 S3 �2 A2.1
M18 Mc
II MC MC
S3 S3
S3
Mc
Mc I
_
is 18 UNIT MIX
IS3 s3 I Name Area Count
M
S4 0 1 St 477 ft2 21
S2 327 ft2 2
ILOBBY ° S3 327 ft2 24
DINING _ _ _ _ - - S4 379 ft2 5
ROOM S5 434 ft2 4
FITNESS6 488 ft2 2
�.
I AL S7 467 ft2 3
Si ,.: S8 402 ft2 2
`KITCHE
S9 431 ft2 12
AL
Sl ; r S10 401 ft2 2
AL 428 ft2 3
Si A I S12 432 ft2 3
17
AL ;a
AL S13 342 ft2 3
LIBRARYS1 16 324 ft2 3
S14AL AL
isS15 356 ft2 3
S16 3
MECH 379 ft2
1 Si S17 381 ft2 3
S9 AL
I Fs 9 A =;., S18 308 ft2 12
A2.2 AL 19 '' S19 434 ft2 2
AL AL ASSISTED S20 306 ft2 2
AL LIVING I ASSISTED LIVING UNITS(AL)= 77 UNITS
S7 S9 IS91 AL AL COURTYARD MEMORY CARE UNITS(AL)= 37 UNITS
P-19 TOTAL UNITS=114 UNITS
- _ o
Level 1 _ -
1 1" = 40'-0"
F",-----kaas GOLDEN VALLEY SENIOR LIVING Al 1—i
GOLDENwilson • • •
FLOOR PLAN LEGEND
MC MC
S2 S2 I�I AL ❑ MECH
MC L�
13
MC MC AL COMMONS MEMORY CARE COMMONS
14 ��JJ
MEMORY
CARE ELEVATOR SALON
COMMONS
MC MC LAUNDRY a STAIR
S3 S3
MC MC
r 18 18 MC
MC I MC
I S3 FS-31a
M3 M3
t
1s 18 a UNIT MIX
Mc
S3 M3 ? Name Area Count
[ MC Mc I 0
S 1 477 ft2 21
AL �' S2 327 ft2 2
C S5AL
COMMONS S3 327 ft2 24
S4 379 ft2 5
C A� S5 434 ft2 4
Sub S6 488 ft2 2
AL S7 467 ft2 3
S1
� Sg 402 ft2 2
LAUNDRY S5 AL AL S9 431 ft2 12
61
SALON ` S4 AL S10 401 ft2 2
S1 AL S11 428 ft2 3
� AL 17 AL S12 432 ft2 3
` S1 �A S13 342 ft2 3
AL AL S14 324 ft2 3
Fsil S15 356 ft2 3
AL MECHAL AL S16 379 ft2 3
s--11 Sg S9 AL S17 381 ft2 3
AL 19 S18 308 ft2 12
S1 ``-- S19 434 ft2 2
AL ALS20 306 ft2 12
FS-71 S9 S9 AL AL ASSISTED LIVING UNITS(AL)= 77 UNITS
1 g MEMORY CARE UNITS(AL)= 37 UNITS
TOTAL UNITS=114 UNITS
Level 2
' 1" = 40'-0"
„ •
. - GOLDEN
FLOOR PLAN LEGEND
AL MECH
AL
13AL AL COMMONS SALON
AL 11
14 ~
ELEVATORElSTAIR
AL
COMMONS
_ El
LAUNDRY
AL I AL
S3 S3
p18 A8
AL AL
[ S3 S3
AL I ss ss UNIT MIX
Ar Ii-
178 18 Name Area Count
AL AL
S3 FS-3-1 S1 477 ft2 21
Al S2 327 ft2 2
FS-41
p ritio S3 327 ft2 24
CAL S4 379 ft2 5
S5 COMMONS L S5 434 ft2 4
S6 488 ft 2
C AL S7 467 ft2 3
S6 S8 402 ft2 2
AL S9 431 ft2 12
A S1 l S10 401 ft2 2
A
LAUNDRY S5 L` AL � S11 428 ft2 3
S4
SALON ` ` S1 S12 432 ft2 3
AL AL S13 342 ft2 3
S1
AL 17 AL S14 324 ft2 3
S1 1® S15 356 ft2 3
AL S16 379 ft2 3
S1 15 S17 381 ft2 3
AL MECH AL S18 308 ft2 12
F1 Sg Sg S19 434 ft2 2
AL S20 306 ft2 12
Si AL ASSISTED LIVING UNITS(AL)= 77 UNITS
S7 AL AL MEMORY CARE UNITS(AL)= 37 UNITS
S9 Sg AL TOTAL UNITS=114 UNITS
12
Level
1 = 40-0
,"---kaas
GOLDEN VALLEY, MN
GOLDEN VALLEY SENIOR LIVING •
• i
i
♦1 1 1
n
F
IP
n
f.
"
�r � n H n _ r
x ..
nT
// 1
•1 1 1
MW
a
a
ti
aasGOLDEN VALLEY SENIOR LIVING A2 . 1
wiI on s
GOLDEN VALLEY, MN Exterior Elevations
•
(
•
A E3
lil
N
Q
0
r
W
LLI
EM
FEM
td
lin w
FT
u i y
C � �
X
r I
i
i
j
1
I
I
r-lam- v
a, a
N
W
cz
_ 0 -*�
Wo Co
$pop-
cp ,
76
zo
CD
ONV
a�
i
lift"
3 COUNTRY CLbB f§ ,OR/Vf - g
�/
f4 y8 1
I
aj
110
-lip i
/ ,1,/ / 1 f r � it i, I I "'f;z,.. `► �
r
�\!1 �
11�Y'� � _ \�(`_ ''I �i Ifs• I
S w 1 w V
/ I � S f1'� \ 21v X11111 m
I R'
CAWEO C
sl
N89.17'45'E
SHM
/rr 3 r i.v'+ `p• - \�\ j I `}\ 1 ` �j�i it
fry I '.� X -�' / \ `gi ' n I La ,y ��►/
.m �••��••••�� 0
(loo
CD
CD
Ig
- / -1.70-�...�. \ \�`�\w`1' =•
/ I d
i
CD 9.1 x 8
CL a 3 I r III ¢a asa 8a1
� ��Dee+ O. 00 vI I a s i t
S3B np 3E
k
�A St
y �
� � a
PROJECT ►, F O t
X - GOLDEN VALLEY SENIOR LIVING ,! p A�.
o 'r <
$ ^ n k
7475 COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE,GOLDEN VALLEY,MN 55427 '� 0
O 'd C
A, „ Ma•
O ALBERT MILLER ` r°r°
O
0
7�
Z O
�# H311IW 1x38 �i����
1`d r—
�r-nn�w L ;
VJ ; . LZ#99 NW'A3-11VA N3MOO- /U2aemok8LL n0owL gggywR a k p
w Ug
w
� s
ONIAI1 MOMS A31-1VA N3mOJ
4
RigQ
R
4
g i8
a g7 °wr-
ng
Of
Pj 11§1
'Uhli
s€ LL °
�
3 „
4 VIM.!m � €� � a� �� � °� off° a �� �� �: 114 � um ��E” �� •
HP
hi U
Ell mu 119 gym . °
4-2
LU
� 1
I
I • w
1 o
S �
F
1 i 1
1 w
Y755 I = 1
n I I 3
A H
Z
,I y
I
j�
3
0
�v 1
gR°gym iz "m C
In w
ism ma HIM
� �0 — —
H Al �g' =�aa °mRIMrA lid
A 4
so€ zg � I x
�nO
I .�1
-
��
A I _
I ` JzI
- n I
O
N nyg I
I
z mgr€ r'F' m ,rte 1
QQRw ggg �+ a23
M
o _
C Z �
s 81 z
n
5
r I:i, z
1-XI'i I;N1.
NAI'
o
l; Gp21°
• $
� a R
N8� Z < $ °
po
m° F g
4 �
4�
4
PRQECT r ® �o Q f -
A y 11, GOLDEN VALLEY SENIOR LIVING
s q s 3 `ag�o«m 0
7475 COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE,GOLDEN VALLEY,MN 55427
N m
�
>mFRI ALBERT MILLER
O i
a
aaivw la381d NUB �� � � '
A�W 0 U E
�;� � LZVSS NW'A31-[VA N30100'3/%iaenl0 AN.Nf100 SOL �oR a �� Q Z �
40
ME
JNIAII 2iOIN3S A311VA N3alOJ •
�tl �� „ io3oaa a
yp
g
4 $ � ias' Ra � " {o 7 o g Q� E qS' $ 1g $ g '} 7 a a $ u woo u a g8g
g 8� g` <y3Y x'1»'� is t'2 11 1 1 I
�Faa 8 $g g3 a ms# QQ '84-A-Q I
g W w W o ase
F 1 it
6_iI HAS
��° M "�Ua zo o a & � w _ g �� a � � � � € a c°�
��� W �� CJI j sam " 83o g ;a
� _��� �� ���,� a � � �y spa � �� g� �3 �� S, � i � `" �#�
�"v< „ "$ 3M §80F, 1 s" b �8 �
SIM ba CY w �' N
S � �� m57sW� m � ia` '° X " �
r9���
011 "�� �g �a g � 1"1 aid o she
w _ oiiYL�bs! z 5 3YY E 3 3 " R d 9 3 8 1Jk
W ''MISHUH wou I 1, gee �a 'a 7 j €� `�e
w � •_
�_ A�t�� r o � ►
a � �
IMfg
I N 8
IN I
f
� SS
z m8�
a \
to, 9"�
1 ®a I020
ll, IM
I ------------� I Sed 9WE
h IJill
"Dixf Hit
€ gig Nil€
Hill Ill 11 1H
#� _g 3
_ _ g g
� w BO; "w g ageg �
C7 ,~EM
isig
Min, 191 11 11111111 x
.-.Lv .LSite
G R O U P
1
, — PUMSCHEdXE-ENTRE SRE
I I t
' 3-
o
,SABVMM GU
—..OAEUdINBNdd6DTPEES
NWE . BOTAWANME SME ROOT
2.B
2 BNS COMEMS
73' MB SiMT.lFA0E0.FUL FgBA
SHL 2 SUNBURST NONE'LOCUST deOlaa UemMre Such' 25' RB STMT.tFADERRRIFORM
L-PFC SAO 5 S--nEOA% OA%aR dmla ZS B6B STRAT.IEADE0.fULfORH
' EVERGREEN nREES
M135AKJCE Pluadeua Oxrb' B'M. BBB 9NGlE LEADER
BF 8 BALSAM FM NMLENiFrn BM. BSB SNGLEIEADFfl
/ I ✓ \ , ORNAMFMALTREl3
/ \AB6, t-KG , PFC B PPANEfFF NWiF1UlG CRIB MMu'PnHN'W 13 BBB BrTUT.IEADER FULiORM
CXlSTJNIi IIIX ISI 1.15.. ♦, SSC 5 9PRNG BNOW CRABAPPLE MFL.SP'^B slw' 1S 86B STMT.LEADER FUL FORM
I-SWO j j JT` S b5 T MTNIBT BRSLMNLE SERVICEBERRY Mrdrdcrx9+^ABaa'Iuen^&i^x' 1S BSB STUT.IFAOER FUL FORM
3
s-ABs �
/ 1•SWO
..._ 1-GOOD PfBRE AS FIELD gFEGrEv BY THE
.��" 1-PRM /� 5 ' AREARANLE T
O I-
0,ETT-NIOFB41
-OHE iRE£5HAPF)
/
ate ANOT1eR wRE SHML2'
TiE TN♦EADED f ,.GOOD L TMWYaN BULK RLLHRND5E COLLARS
^. i , l(dIIK RARE JAOlION.
11 -' RAHf TREE I'-
1-SSC ABW'E
/ 1 1-`./ 11.!11,1 EAasnHa WADE
/]PFC '�% F4L!-H Ta MHt ED6E OF SNOEft KIS
N1ACN T'FROM 1NIIK
I i
/ , ExlEnr 5 SRADE ,n
/ ' of r oT Bnt.t_�F roweloo[.RAOIa�, V
cur Arra REeme IBXaAP FTRaH r Z N
RErn.-E wFr.ETsr N
( (f�� I S N HOLE
IN'; L�II1 B.ALYF1LL AS EPFL
IIFIEO
BELOt POO1B/1L J
DECIDUOUO US TREE O � d'
' Nrs W w J
fRUE A5 FNiO TE, TO BY TIE �A 9 J
/ LANGSGME NR A.N TO TREE (n o c
AF1°FAR/JVLE ReTAN iLpUL 11d3 5NIPE1 Ur i
•, `. —--——_—————— ——��— nfdff 2'%♦'XD'YO'JOEN STA .,STAINED �Fv�
To5ERBt 5TKEs EH—BE RILED ATT OO' W Y.
— ro ole ANTHER WRE SMALL BE TrIEADED J p W
—— TTHZNFiII TK/LK R3eBER xaEE ca>.u+<, J OT m
TRK FLIRE—TON a 7 J
PLnHr,REE I'-2'ABOVE FX15nN5 WADE U a
>
1-I.LGM TO NEER EDGE 6 SV .K1EP MACH >
.. - r PRaH 1RlIK. Z
lzw
.. .. E%ISnNS ERAOE Q O
I Xl5/INC 4 STORY HUil.DING o MDRE1OeBRM RwroPl�oF J
ROOT BALL.R NSM-BOOCLRMABLE.REMTiE
LowLErS.r O v
I.. YOPE SOPS of
HOLE ,
BACKFIu PS SPFLIFI® V
W NOT EXCAVATE B-1 P60TO4
�TINEE T%ES wD1N
OF RNIBNl
EVERGREEN TREE
2 N75
fRITE AS FiB.O DNEGIED BY
LN05CAPE ARcrnTsr ro IIHFFIOJE
I.FYFIRAIICE RETAN HORN.L SHAPEI
RArR TOP 6 ROOI&LL1 I-T ABO+E g
♦Bove yNpaUIroINS d+ADE
IRRIGATION NOTES: SPECIALITY NOTES: Ixm HULH 2•FR01H TUINc
LANDSCAPE NOTES: 1. EN SrESMLLBENLLYEKi1GATED.THF COxmrcrORSHALLSUBNRTAWAMN 14. MLVMVEBOJIEBANDCOVERSSHALLBEBULKMCMM
SHOP DRAWSVGS FOR NETIEW ANDAPPRWM SY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PROR TO uNDEN THE uws OF THE aiaTE OF
ALLBHRUBBEUL SRALLBE EBBAFWIIH♦' BH OFRE OOUBLE BHREODEO MSTA TON. 15. GROUPVKVE BOXES 70GFTIER Edi FRSE WHEN SEMRE SREI%EED.LOGIEN
HARDWODO MULCN OVER WEED GARNER OWNERS REP$HNC MPROVF MUCH PLANT BED AREAS WHENEVER POSSBLE EO51U16
SWFPEPNORTOINSTAllA ,EWlNGSHMLBEMETMEDGNGORAPPNOVED 2 SEE MECHANGLPIO 0.ECTROM BANS M'O SPECIFICATIONS FOR RRIMTIDN WATER, ROOTS AT OIfBt EDGE OF ROORML LC0513ED _�1�TA
EOOAL LIFTER AVD POWER CONNECTONS, I8. IRRIWTXN OOHTROI3ER LOLAIKKI SNML BE VERFlFDONSTIENiTN gvlERS TO EIEAARE fROFER B.LKFILI-TOfOOr CONTILr 1�//�()T/g�nwr(./L,
SLOPE 5DF5 LF HOLE
REPRESENTNE
2 RANT MTEPoI2S S—CONFORM WITH THE AA.EIUGLN ASSOCUtON OF 3. Cd IT OR TO VERIFY LOCATION OF ALL UNDERE-U-ABOVE—ND FACAJTES
NURSERYMEN SrANOA AND SHNL BE OF HANDY STOCK,FREE FROM dSFJSE. PRgANY
RTOELCAVATXk NsruUTKN.ANYdJMGE To UH.ERGRWNOUBOJE 17, Cd1TRd V%REs:Ia GMIGE pRECT BUR111,sOLp COPPER NRMATI011 WNE RIM TREE REMOVAL INVENTORY: BAGIffIU AS
DAMAGEA,dSFIGOUTDN.--C-1B.SPD UE MR—A G INC WFACBBES SN—BE THE RES OfijTY OF ME CONTRACTOR AND COSTS UNDER MMN LME.USE MOSTIIRFREOOF SPLJCES AND SPLICE ONLY M V WS OR SSUEISUBMTTN SUMMARY
PULL SfTL1RLAilON
RUMBNESS OF PUNT MATERML FOR g1RNG OF ACCEMM'LE PERM. A550CMTEOWRH CORRECTING OAMAGES SHALL BE BORNE ENTNELY BY THE BOXES.RUN SEPARATE MOT AND COMMON VAR TO FACHVMVE AND ONE(1)SPARE WIRE CO NIOT FYLAVAIE I
TRACTOR. D
ANGRWNDTo N—ESTVALVE FROMCOWR LEk LB LORCOL�IC— TO RENMM REAgVE PERCENT
CONReOT�Il.
3. UPON DISCOVERY OF A B6 REPANC'BETWEEN THE OUMRRY OF PLANTS SH— WIRES. REMDMED SHRUB
35.4
ONTIE SCHEDULE"THE OMMITY SHIOMJ ON THE PLAN.THE RAN SHAM A SERVICEEOUi NT BNSTNL TONSMLLBEPERLOCAIUILRYC/JAIPARY DECIDUOUS 71 12 33 "A% 3 NTS
GOVERN. STPNONASPNDBHAILBEFERMTD ANDLd'. GOES E)UCr LOGTONOF 16. AVOW OLERWUY ON BUILdNGB,PAVEMENT,WALLS AND NOAONAY$BY INOVDUMLY CONFEROLIS 1B T3 19 M.S%
Lg1OIKfNdVEGETATION SMLLBf MONTORED BY TME LANDSCAPE ARCNIIELT SERVICEEDJPMENTSYNLBECOdANATFDWTTHTHE LANDSCAPE ARCHRECTOR AONSTNG RAOJS OR NEC ON SPRNKLER!FADS AND ROW coNTRd OrJ AUfdAATNC SUHTOTK 37 25
A MROOGHWTTHEWMnONWTIE CONTRACT.LANDSCAPE MTERWSPART OF
EWNALENTATTHEMBSRE TOTK
THE CONTRACT SHALL BE WARRWTFD FORONE 111 NLLGPOWING SEASONS FROM 5. COIiTRACTORBHPLL LOOROBUTE WRH LOCAL UTNIYCOMPANY FOR THE RROPQSED 19, ADNISi PRESSURE RGUUTNG VALVES FOR OPTIMUM PRESSURE ON SITE SEE REMWMS RIN FOR ORIGIWL LOG1DNBd REMWEO PUNT MAIFRUL LEGEND:
SUSSTANTNL CdAP1.E110N MTE. ELELTNBLAL SERVICE AND METERNG FACXRES.
. BE SCREENS ON KL HEADS.
S ALL-5 WTUHBED BY CONSTRUCTOItTMT1ES
N S—RECEWE♦'UYER LOAM S. N TOWA
NTERLNECONNECTON6 61Y(ATBUBOING.VERFYWIM —NOM
MIDSOOAB SPECIFIED UWESS OIiERW19E NOTEDON THE DR/.WNGS. PUWSCWAGE, 21. LOHrRACTdR51WLSUPPLY,W'A LrPLANOFRRIWMINSYS/EMATTHEnMEOF 9H RFLTER FABRIC.
MROW000 WLLHIdC BROv.N),
CPLEIKN TO OWNERS REPRESENTTYE.A SET OF A"UILT DRAWINGS SHML BE MRFLIE
OA
6, COORONATE LOGIDN OFVEGETATpN UNDERGROUNOANDWERHEAO T- ALLMANIIESBIMLLBEIB•BELOWFNISHEBdUDE. MNfNNEDONSITEATNITB,E31NANLNMTEDCONDMO RENSION SUMMRY
UTNTES,LIGHTING FDOURES,DOORS AND WNDOAS CONTRACTORE—L STINE N �BE—ROCK OVER MOTEXTLE,ttP.
THE FELO F,MLOGT)ON OF TREES MRD SHRUBS FOR REVEW ANO IPPRWMBY 8. A UTEFAL LINES SHP BE 1r BELLOW FNSHED GRADE 22, ALL RPE T MD MR SHALL HAVE THRUST BLOCKING AT EACH TURN.
THE UNOSMPE ARCNMU PNOR TO INS_TION.
9. M.LEJROSFD PVC PBERS.IFANY,SHML BE OUYNCdOR. TJ. &LAU ATICREWMT ONTROLVKVEGWTLLMVETIB'BMIIMDEPMOF3N'WA91ED ''.ty fir NST WUCH TOP301L.SEED PNO
i. ALL RANT MIEAVLSSHALLBE WAIEREDAND NAMMNED INTI ACCEPTANCE. GRAVEL UNDFRNGIH VMVE AND VALVEBOIOMVEL SWYL FXIEM3'BE'diD � NVOROMULCH
e. RPPR Ai NO LOBI i00WNERML MMAGE RESULTNG FROMUNORCAPE 10. CONTRACTORSlWLUYM MEEVESMIDCMN ATZ-0ULOWrNEFNIBIEDGMDE PERMETER OF VMVE W%
LEPWAT01[S TTO1E5, OFTHE TOP OF PAYEMEM.E%LEND SLEEVES TO?-0 BEYOND PAVENENT.
N. THERESHALLBETMINWMSPACE BETWEEN BOTTOM OFVMVE BO%LOVER ANO TOPOO
9. SWEEP AND MNNTIMAUP—BSURFACESFREOFDEBRISGENERATEDFROM 11. CONIPALTOR SHMI.MARK 11E LOGiK]N OFALL SLEEVES ANO LdJDURNRH THE —A STRICTURE GOPHER STATE ONE CALL LANDSCAPE AND TREE
LANDSCAPE COHIRAC1YlRSPLRNnES SLEEVING MTEPoM'ELLEd TO ZA'ABWEFlNWEOGRME ADCPPPF➢. jjWP HERS TATEONECALL.ORG
(BOO)TST-E1 E`LLFREE PRESERVATION PLAN
12 fABNOATE ILL PNE TO MANUFACi1ME93PEdFMATI0N9 WRN CLEAN ANDSWIRE CUT (B5t)
45A-0OOT LOCAL N
.MS.USE WMITY GRADE FRIMERANDS WNTCEWWFORWUTEOFORNTENOEO
OF CONNEC'M
13. BACKFLL ALL TRENCHER WRH SOI FREE OF SHARP OBJECTS AND BEENA 1�
Lau D my
City 0
goldenvi ,4,4� MEMORANDUM
valley City Administration/Council
763-593-8003/763-593-8109(fax)
Executive Summary For Action
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
August 6, 2014
Agenda Item
6. A. Resolution Establishing Departments of the City
Prepared By
Thomas D. Burt, City Manager
Summary
Earlier in the agenda, the City Council took action on the second consideration of Ordinance
#525, Consideration of Ordinance Amendment- City Code Sections 2.30- 2.36 - City
Departments. Should the Council adopt Ordinance #525,the Code Amendment requires the
City's departments be established and amended by resolution of the City Council in consultation
with the City Manager. The proposed resolution would establish the departments of:
Administrative Services, Park & Recreation, Police, Fire and Physical Development.
Attachments
• Organization Chart by City Departments (1 page)
• Resolution Establishing the Departments of the City (1 page)
Recommended Action
Motion to adopt Resolution Establishing the Departments of the City.
goId bll
Organization Chart by City Departments
Citizens of
Golden Valley
City Council/
HRA
Board of Zoning Environmental Civil Service Human Rights Planning Human Services Open Space& Envision Connection
Appeals Commission Commission Commission Commission Fund Recreation Commission Project Board
City Manager Bond Consultant
City Attorney
Administrative Park&Recreation Physical Development
Services Department Department Police Department Fire Department Department
Resolution 14-63 August 6, 2014
Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING DEPARTMENTS OF THE CITY
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Golden Valley that it hereby
establishes the City Departments of: Administrative Services, Park & Recreation, Police,
Fire and Physical Development, effective August 14, 2014.
Shepard M. Harris, Mayor
ATTEST:
Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member
and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor
and his signature attested by the City Clerk.
city 0,f IT 6
gotaenl! MEMORANDUM
valley City Administration/Council
763-593-3989/763-593-8109(fax)
Executive Summary For Action
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
August 6, 2014
Agenda Item
6. B. Resolution Modifying 2014 General Wages and Salary for New Physical Development
Director, Planning Manager, and Associate Planner/Grant Writer Positions
Prepared By
Chantell Knauss, Assistant City Manager
Summary
With the recent reorganization of City Departments, two new positions (Physical Development
Director and Associate Planner/Grant Writer have been created as well as the reclassification of
the City Planner as Planning Manager.
These positions are not included on the 2014 Resolution establishing non-union General Wages
and Salaries.
Attachments
• Resolution Modifying 2014 General Wages and Salaries (1 page)
Recommended Action
Motion to adopt Resolution Modifying 2014 General Wages and Salary for New Physical
Development Director, Planning Manager, and Associate Planner/Grant Writer Positions.
Resolution 14-64 August 6, 2014
Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION MODIFYING 2014 GENERAL WAGES AND SALARY
FOR NEW PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR, PLANNING MANAGER,
AND ASSOCIATE PLANNER/GRANT WRITER POSITIONS
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Golden Valley that it hereby adopts
the following amendment to Resolution 13-112, modifying the general wages and salary
schedule for the new personnel named herein effective August 14, 2014:
MANAGEMENT Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5
Physical Development Director $110,346 $115,600 $120,855 $126,109 $131,364
PROFESSIONAL EXEMPT Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5
Planning Manager $ 65,407 $ 68,522 $ 71,637 $ 74,751 $ 77,866
Associate Planner/Grant Writer $ 55,927 $ 58,590 $ 61,254 $ 63,917 $ 66,580
Shepard M. Harris, Mayor
ATTEST.-
Kristine
TTEST:Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member
and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and his
signature attested by the City Clerk.
city 01
lWn ��dllli
avalley s.'Planning Department
763-593-8095 1763-593-8109 (fax)
Executive Summary For Action
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
August 6, 2014
Agenda Item
6. C. Approval of Plat - Olson Tralee
Prepared By
Jason Zimmerman, City Planner
Summary
At the July 15, 2014, City Council meeting, the Council approved the Final Plat of Olson Tralee
(125 Cutacross Road). Coinciding with a recent change to lot width requirements in the Zoning
Code, the Applicant is requesting the Council rescind the resolution approving the Final Plat and
approve a slightly revised Final Plat.
Engineering and Planning Staff have reviewed the new Final Plat, as has the Planning
Commission, and finds it consistent with the requirements of the City Code.
Attachments
• Resolution Rescinding Resolution 14-58 Approving Plat - Olson Tralee (1 page)
• Resolution for Approval of Plat - Olson Tralee (1 page)
• Previously Approved Final Plat of Olson Tralee (1 page)
• Revised Final Plat of Olson Tralee (1 page)
Recommended Action
Motion to adopt Resolution for Approval of Plat - Olson Tralee.
Resolution 14-65 August 6, 2014
Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION RESCINDING RESOLUTION 14-58
APPROVING PLAT - OLSON TRALEE
WHEREAS, the City Council for the City of Golden Valley on July 15, 2014,
accepted and approved the proposed plat known as Olson Tralee covering the following
described tract of land:
Lot 4, Block 5, Tralee; and
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Ordinance Number 523, effective on July 24,
2014, modifying minimum lot requirements for subdivision; and
WHEREAS, the Applicant desires to create a more regular shaped lot as part of the
Olson Tralee plat.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council for the City of Golden
Valley, that Resolution No. 14-58, approving the plat of Olson Tralee, is hereby rescinded
and the authorization to execute the plat is revoked.
Shepard M. Harris, Mayor
ATTEST:
Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member
and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor
and his signature attested by the City Clerk.
Resolution 14-66 August 6, 2014
Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION FOR APPROVAL OF PLAT - OLSON TRALEE
WHEREAS, the City Council for the City of Golden Valley, pursuant to due notice,
has heretofore conducted a public hearing on the proposed plat to be known as Olson
Tralee covering the following described tracts of land:
Lot 4, Block 5, "Tralee"
WHEREAS, all persons present were given the opportunity to be heard;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council for the City of Golden
Valley, that said proposed plat be, and the same hereby is, accepted and approved, and
the proper officers of the City are hereby authorized and instructed to sign the original of
said plat and to do all other things necessary and proper in the premises.
Shepard M. Harris, Mayor
ATTEST:
Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member
and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor
and his signature attested by the City Clerk.
R.T. DOC. NO.
OLS- ON TRALEE KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS:That Roberta A.O.Knaeble as Personal Representative of the Estate of Lois A.Olson,desceased,fee owner of the
following described property situated In the County of Hennepin,State of Minnesota to wit:
Lot 4,Block 5,"Tralee".
Has caused the same to be surveyed and platted as OLSON TRALEE and does hereby dedicate to the public for public use the drainage and utility easements as
\ created by this Plat.
\ Inwitness whereof said Roberta A.O.Knaeble as Personal Representative of the Estate of Lois A.Olson,desceased,has hereunto set her hand this_—day
of ,2014.
\ ESTATE OF LOIS A.OLSON,DESCEASED
\ ` By ,its Personal Representative
rte,,t Roberta A.0.Knaeble
STATE OF
`„` COUNTY OF
< ,20I4,by Roberta A.O.Knaeble,Personal Representative
This Instrument was acknowledged before me on this day of
of the the Estate of Lois A.Olson,desceased,on behalf of the estate.
/ AS .k Notary Printed Name Notary Public,
My Commission Expires
Y `
• / \\ � \ 1,Thomas J.Adam do hereby certify that this plat was prepared by me or under my direct supervision;that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor in the State of
Minnesota;Mat this plat is a correct representation of the boundary survey;that all mathematical data and labels are wrrect y designated on this plat;that all
mo
rwments depicted on this plat have been,or will be correctly set within one year;that all water boundaries and wet lands,as defined In Minnesota Statutes,
Al \\ ' \ Section 505.01,Subd.3,as of the date of this certificate are shown and labeled on this plat;and all public ways are shown and labeled on this plat.
' Dated this day of ,2014.
-
f Thomas].Adam,Licensed land Surveyor
\ - Minnesota License No.43414
STATE 0/ \
` / i•�i /� COUNTY
oto OF DAKOTA
A
This Instrument was acknowledged before me on this day of ,2014,by Thomas J.Adam.
/
t.
/' // \\ Notary Printed Name My Commission Expires January 31,2015
/
CITY COUNCIL,CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY,MINNESOTA
This lot of OLSON TRALEE was aDProved and accepted by the City Council of the City of Golden Valley,Minnesota at a regular meeting thereof held this
da of ,2014.If applicable,the written comments and recommendations of the Commissioner of Transportation and the County
Highway Engineer have been received by the City or the prescribed 30-day period has elapsed without receipt of such comments and recommendations,as
provided by Minnesota Statutes,Section 505.03,Subdivision 2.
�W FJ t<� City Council,CIN of Golden Valley,Minnesota
// \\ ._ I" ,Clerk
By ,Mayor BY
Li Llu
RESIDENT AND REAL ESTATE SERVICES,Hennepin County,Minnesota
-------_ 199.73 60
L-------, >S^ ------e---_ • 014.
--- �,Sr 2
`•t _ >>. I +_ I hereby certify that the taxes payable in 2014 and prior years have been paid for land described on this plat,dated this_day of
46.45 236.17 r
S89 45 39 W
(136.00"TRALFF) B
I Y:Mark V.Chapin,County Auditor ,Deputy
" •�•----The south line of Lot 4,Block 5,"TRALEE" I
f SURVEY DIVISION,Hennepin County,Minnesota -
6p 1 2014.
Pursuant to MN.STAT.Section 3838.565(1969),this plat has been approved this day of
County Surveyor By:
Drainage and Utility Easements are shown
thus:
N ;6 6i
I I REGISTRAR OF TITLES,Hennepin County,Minnesota
t o'clock 4,a .M.
I I 7 hereby certify that Me within plat of OLSON TRALEE was filed In this office this_—day of 201 _.
The south Bne of Lot 4,Block 5,"TRALEE",has a I I
bearing of S89"45'39"W. 16 6
----� ------ ,Deputy
(X XX) Denotes dimension from the plat -- _ Martin McCormick,Registrar of'nties By:
of"TRALEE' -
r Denotes iron monument found
0 Denotes 1/2 Inch by 14 Inch Iron monument set Being 6 feet in width and adjoining side lot
o t0 20 40 6o and marked'by Mthnesota License No.43414 lines and being 10 feet In width and adoining
block lines.
Rehder and Associates. Inc.
Scale in Feet
R.T. DOC. NO.
OLSON T KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS:That Roberta A.O.Knaeble as Personal Representative of the Estate of Lois A.Olson,desceased,fee owner of the
following described property situated In the County of Hennepin,State of Minnesota to wit:
Lot 4,Block 5,'Tralee%
\ Has caused the same to be surveyed and platted as OLSON TRALEE and does hereby dedicate to the public for public use the drainage and utility easements as
created by this plat.
\ In witness whereof said Roberta A.0.Knaeble as Personal Representative of the Estate of Lois A.Olson,desceased,has hereunto set her hand this_day
of ,2014.
ESTATE OF LOIS A.OLSON,DESCEASED
\ By ,Its Personal Representative
'''•cel Roberta A.O.Knaeble
\ 'c' •c^� STATE OF
c,t^� COUNTY OF
This Instrument was acknowledged before me on[his day of ,2014,by Roberta A.0.Knaeble,Personal Representative
of the the Estate of Lois A.Olson,desceased,on behalf of the estate.
Notary Printed Name Notary Public,
My Commission Expires
\
/ \\
Q�e
I,Thomas J.Adam do hereby certify that this plat was prepared by me or under my that all direct supervision;
cal data andtlabels are I orrectlyedesignated on this plat,that all
Minnesota;that this plat is a correct representation of the boundary survey;
\ ; \ monuments depicted on this plat have been,or will be correctly set within one year;that all water boundaries and wet lands,as deFlned In M nnesotaStatutes,
^y'�(O• / \ Section 505.01,Subd.3,as of the date of this certificate are shown and labeled on this plat;and all public ways are shown and labeled on this plat.
Dated this day of ,2014.
Thomas J.Adam,Licensed Land Surveyor
( / \
' v / \ / Minnesota License No.43414
'7 STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF DAKOTA
This instrument was acknowledged before me on this day of ,2014,by Thomas J.Adam.
/
/ O Notary Printed Name Notary Public,Minnesota
My Commission Expires January 31,2015
CITY COUNCIL,CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY,MINNESOTA
This plat of OLSON TRALEE was approved and accepted by the City Council of the City of Golden Valley,Minnesota at a of
meeting thereof held this
da of ,2014. If applicable,the written comments and recommendations of the Commissioner of Transportation and the County
Highway Engineer have been received by the City or the prescribed 30-day period has elapsed without receipt of such comments and recommendations,as
Drovided by Minnesota Statutes,Section 505.03,Subdivision 2.
City Council,CIN of Golden Valley,Minnesota
%1 j By ,Mayor By ,Clerk
ii Li
I / \ u
/ - I ——————— -----' I ��
-�S�',57„w I i`` RESIDENT AND REAL ESTATE SERVICES,Hennepin County,Minnesota
S89°45'39 W
236.17 a I hereby certify that the taxes payable in 2014 and prior years have been paid for land described on this plat,dated this day of 2014.
(236.00'r LEE')
v -- The south line of Lot 4,Block 5,"TRALEE" I I Mark V.Chapin,County Auditor By: ,Deputy
I60 SURVEY DIVISION,Hennepin County,Minnesota
I Pursuant to MN.STAT.Section 3838.565(1969),this plat has been approved this_day of ,2014.
County Surveyor By:
Drainage and Utility Easements are shown
N thus:
6 6
I REGISTRAR OF TITLES,Hennepin County,Minnesota
The south line of Lot 4,Block 5,"TRALEE",has a I I —
I hereby certify that the within plat of OLSON TRALEE was filed In this office this day of ,2014,at o'clock .M.
bearing of S89°45'39"W.
16 61
(XXX.XX) Denotes dimension from the plat ------J ------
of"TRALEE" _ - Martin McCormick,Registrar of Titles By: ,Deputy
e Denotes Iron monument found
O Denotes 1/2 Inch by 14 inch iron monument set Being 6 feet in width and adjoining side lot
0 10 20 40 60 and marked by Minnesota License No.43414 lines and being 10 feet in width and adoining
block lines.
Scale in Feet
Rehder and Associates, Inc.