09-09-14 CM Agenda Packet AGENDA
Council/Manager Meeting
Golden Valley City Hall
7800 Golden Valley Road
Council Conference Room
September 9, 2014
6:30 pm
Pages
1. Golden Valley Little League Loan (30 minutes) 2-11
2. Bassett Creek Watershed Commission (45 minutes) 12-15
3. Winter Parking Restrictions (30 minutes) 16-17
4. Minneapolis Residential Construction Management Agreement (15 minutes) 18-22
5. City Code Section 12: Subdivision Regulations (Platting) 23
- Review Entire Section (?)
- Large Lot Subdivision/Zoning (30 minutes)
- Subdivision Moratorium (30 Minutes)
6. Proposed 2015-2016 Other Funds Biennial Budget (30 minutes) 24-39
7. Beyond the Yellow Ribbon Campaign(10 minutes) 40
Council/Manager meetings have an informal, discussion-style format and are designed
for the Council to obtain background information, consider policy alternatives, and
provide general directions to staff. No formal actions are taken at these meetings. The
public is invited to attend Council/Manager meetings and listen to the discussion; public
participation is allowed by invitation of the City Council.
This document is available in alternate formats upon a 72-hour request. Please calE `
' 763-593-8006 (TTY: 763-593-3968)to make a request. Examples of alternate forrnats
may include large print, electronic, Brail}e, aud'iocassette, etc.
Cl��1 C?�
City Administration/Council
763-593-8003/763-593-8109(fax)
�,_�� ���E�.,,��s�+�=i�3��-. � .�...s �::'�' ��.'� � !�..i: T:�: �:�ss�.� .. .... . ......
..�_.�a .ti. ���.::: ��-�. . ... . .
Executive Summary
Golden Valley Council/Manager Meeting
September 9, 2014
Agenda Item
1. Golden Valley Little League Loan
Prepared By
Thomas Burt, City Manager
Summary
To construct the expansion of Isaacson Park the Golden Valley Little League (GVLL) committed to
pay the City$67,500. In 2012, the City adopted Resolution 12-22 which authorized a loan of the
remaining balance of$27,500 over 5 years with 0% interest. To date, the City has received only one
payment in 2013 totaling$5,500 leaving a remaining balance of$22,000.
As you can see from the attached letter from the GVLL they are requesting the remaining loan
balance be forgiven since they have made $25,734 of improvements to the concession stand.
Under the terms of the lease agreement the improvements to the concession stand are considered
leaseholder improvements, and the lessee is responsible for all costs and expenses of installation
and maintenance of any and all improvements to the property.
Staff recommends the term of the loan be extended one year.
If there is consensus of the City Council, staff will bring a revised resolution to the City Council
meeting on September 16.
Attachments
• Letter from GVLL President Pat Dale dated May 12, 2014 (2 pages)
• Resolution 12-22, Resolution Authorizing Loan for Park Improvements to Golden Valley Little
League (7 pages)
May 12, 2014
Mr.Tom Burt
City Manager
City of Golden Valley
7800 Golden Valley Road
Golden Valley, MN 55427
Dear Mr. Burt,
As President of Golden Valley Little league, GVLL, I am writing to request revisions be made to the
Isaacson Park lease that is currently in place between the city and GVLL. In the lease GVLL is the tenant.
As such the lease assigns GVLL responsibility for costs related to care, maintenance, and improvements
made to the park or the facilities at the park. With the expansion of the number of fields in 2011 GVLL
pledged to provide$68,000 towards the cost of the project. The pledge provided nearly 15%a of the total
cost of the project.Through 2012 GVLL had paid off$46,000 of the pledged amount.
In the fall of 2012, GVLL began discussions with Rick Jacobsen about a three year plan to improve the
concession stand located in the park. GVLL understands that the building is owned by the City of Golden
Valley and as such the City needed to be involved in the process.The stand had never been upgraded
and was not up to required codes. The reason for the staged improvement plan was based on the fact
that the concession stand is the primary fundraising platform for the league. Funds raised during the
season from the stand were being used to make yearly payments on the remaining balance.A three year
plan to bring the stand up to code would allow GVLL to operate the stand during the 3 month baseball
season,earning needed revenue, while allowing improvements to the stand in steps during non-baseball
months.
In early 2013, GVLL submitted a formal 3 year improvement plan for the concession stand to Mr.
Jacobson.The plan was submitted by Mr.Jacobson to the City Manager and other City Staff. GVLL was
informed that in order to make any improvements inside the stand we were required to obtain a
building permit from the City. In going through the permit application process, GVLL learned that a
permit could not be issued by the City without the approval of the plan by the Hennepin County
Environmental Health Department.The County approval process would not allow for a staged, systemic
improvement of the stand.Submitted plans required that the stand be brought completely up to code at
the same time. In addition, GVLL was informed that the stand could not be operated until it was brought
up to code.
As a result of the above process, GVLL initiated a complete remodel of the concession stand.This
process took a total of 6 months to complete.The costs of the improvements were$25,734. In addition
to these costs, GVLL lost out on a projected $10,500 in revenue during the 2013 season.
GVLL is requesting that the City Council allow for the investment GVLL made to improve the concession
stand to be credited as payment on the remaining balance for the field expansion. GVLL has made to
date a total investment of$71,734 toward the improvements at Isaacson Park.
In addition to the above request,the GVLL Board is requesting that the lease agreement between the
City and GVLL be terminated. GVLL desires to utilize Golden Valley athletic facilities similar to other
community youth athletic associations. Our goal is to be a youth athletic association and fiscal partner
with the Parks and Recreation Department and work together to plan facility maintenance and future
capital improvements/replacements at community facilities used by GVLL.
As the President of GVLL I am happy to meet with or participate in any discussions where my input or
knowledge is considered helpful.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Sincerely,
Pat Dale
Resolution 12-22 March 20, 2012
Member Scanlon introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTI�N AUTHORIZING LOAN FOR
PARK IMPROVEMENTS TO GOLDEN VALLEY LITTLE LEAGUE
WHEREAS, the Council supported an application for Hennepin Youth Sports Program
Grant with Resolution 09-56 for improvements to develop the Honeywell Field Expansion
with an estimate of $467,500, and
WHEREAS, the Little League was responsible for $67,500 and the Hennepin Youth
Grant wauld fund $400,000, and
WHEREAS, the Little League has paid the City of Golden Valley $40,000 through
December 31, 2011, and
WHEREAS, the Little League has guaranteed payment over the next five years the
remainder of the amount of $27,500 with payments due by October 31, and
WHEREAS, the Little League will need to make full payment before entering into
another improvement loan with the City, and
WHEREAS, the Little League has a lease agreement with the City of Golden Valley for
the use af premises of North 400 fee of Lot 1, Block 1, Honeywell Addition through April 30,
2021 shown in Attachment A, and
WHEREAS, the Golden Valley Little League has approved the loan for improvements
shown in Attachment B, and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Golden
Valley as follows:
1. The City shall receive payments with no interest from the Golden Valley Little
League. The payments are due by October 31 in each year below:
Date Princi al
10/31/2012 $5,500
10/31/2013 $5,500
10/31/2014 $5,500
10/31/2015 $5,500
10/31/2016 $5,500
2. Park Improvement Fund will receive the money for the loan to the Golden Valley
Little League.
Resolution 12-22 - Continued March 20, 2012
.
Shepar M, Harris, Mayor
ATTEST:
-I I1 � V/l�'`t/�'u- '
Susan M. Virnig, City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member Clausen
and upon a vote being taken thereon, the fallowing voted in favor thereof: Clausen,
Freiberg, Harris, Pentel and Scanlon; and the following voted against the same: none,
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor
and his signature attested by the City Clerk.
Resolution 12-22 - Continued March 20, 2012
Exhibit A
LEASE AGREEM�NT�
r�
THIS LEASE,made and entered into this2�day of . 6�rc+�� , 2q01 between�'i�y of
C`irolcie��a11eX,ah��i��t�`e�iita rrtttnicipai°cor��r�:tion,liavin�;:at�offee af 7800 �,�,xold�t� Va�lley R�oa�,
Gald�n'dall:ey,lVlm�esota(her.e'tiia�ter eall�d.�`�:ess�r"�,and 0ol�ien Val�ey Litt'le>Lea�ue, Inc„a
Minnesota c�rporation, having a mailing address of��0 Broakview Aarkway, Cxolden Valley,
Minnesota(hereinafter cailed"Lessee").
WITNES�ETI=T,that Les$or, in consideration of the eo�renanfs of I.ess�e herein cantained,
hereby leases and le.ts to I.essee the Ianzi'in the City o�Golden Vaile�, County o�Hennepin, State of
Minnesota,desat�ibed as foIl�ws,tb wit:
The 3�Torth 400 feet of�,ot I, Block 1,Honeywell Golden Vattey Addition,
for a term of twenty(20)years fcom the first day of �ot�r� , 20D�,to a�nd 'tneluding the
,
3�� day of_��t � � ,20'�,l for the sum of ONE DQLLAR($1.00)payabie in advance.
_�
Lessee,in consicleration ofthe-cQv�nant�of Lessor herein�ontai�:ed��ovenartts vuith'Lessor as
follows:
1.. Use o€"Premfses. Lessee widl use the Premises only as a basebaii �;e{d in cnri7rzi�ction
with its Littie�eague program; wi-11 maint�in the Premises in azi orderly, clean an�i sanitary conditi�n;
will not permit an.y things ta he done in�iolati�n of the regulations;ordinances and laws appiicabie
thereto; and witl not comrnit nr suffer any waste thereon.
2. Entry b. Ly essor,. :T�essee will all�w Lessor t�p en�er upon the Premises at any t'ime to
inspect satne.
3. .tlssi�ntnr�ent;and:S�bl�ttin�, Less�e will not assign this Lease nor subiet�(1 or any part
o�the.�rerrris�s.
4. Xr�deinnity and.Hold Har�mless. Lessee will indemnify axad hold LessQr harmless from
any Iiability,'loss and expenses(inclttdin�attorn�ey's�ees)whic�a may be inctirred:by; or i�posed upon,
Resolution 12-22 - Continued March 20, 2012
Lessar by reasor�of clairns for damages beeause of bodity injury, includir�g de�th,or iri;ju�ry to or
�
destruc#'ion of prope��y axisuig���ro'wing out of, or cesuiting or occurring in conne�tivn with ai�y act
or omission to ac#, vc�urnng upan,in or about the Premises:
�. Insttr�nee, T,essee wi�l carry:at�d,p�g forpub�3e liability insurat�ee vvi�Z�odil�r injury
limits of$750,.004:Ob per person:atzd property c�amag�limits of$10�Q;00fl.00�er accidet�t, covering the
liability Contra�ted for in pa�agraph 4. The Lessee represen�s �t is additionally insuced by a nationat
umbrella poliey with a lirnit of$1,00O,OOQ:00 per accident, T1ie Lessee further agTees to furnish
certifc�t�s of the abnve'i�sura�c�to ttie L•essor nam�iitg Lessor as an additional i�ure.cl, not later than
ten(1Q)days affer excc��2ion Qf this Lease,and will provide�,essor with writ�en notice ten (10)days
prior to cancellati'on o�the policy or any materiai change in the coverage.pr4vided,
6. Li hts: Lessee has installed lights-(the"Lights")at the Pcernises and agrees to the
following;
{a) Upon I,ease expiratian,including, but not limited to,termination pursuant to
paragraph 8 di the Le�se;upon the request of Lessor,Lessee shall,at
Lesse�'s sole cost and expense,return the Premises;to the condit'[�t�it wa�in
at the commencement of Ehis Lease.
(b) The t,ig�hts sha�l be separatly metered,at Lessee's sal.e cost and expense,
and i;essee sha�l pay; i�t a timely fashion,any a�d a,11 ele+ctri+eity dr other
utility bills associated wi�h the Lights.
7. Abandoriment,or Defa�ilt. Tn case Lessee s�all vacate or abandon the Premis�s �r
dEfault in any of the covenants herein eontained,Lessee hereby A�.�tl�orizes and empowers Lessor, at its
option, to caneel.and rermin�te th;[s lease and immediately talce posse�$iola bf the Premises,and that
upon termination of this�.ease,v5il�ether by eacpiratian of th�tei�rn or otherwise; Lessee will quietly
surrender the P�emises co I,essor:
$. Ca11c�Ilalibn.
(a) Lessor shall alsa have the�ig�it to cancel this Lease at any tirne by g��+ing six
(6j months prior writte� noti:ce af eancellation,
(b) Lessee shall have the n�l�t'to cancel this Lease at any tim�by giv'zrig Lesspr
at least tbirty(30)days prior writte�a notice:of cancellat?oan.
2
Resolution 12-22 - Continued March 20, 2012
9. Sucrender. At the e�iration of the term of t�is Lease or upon cancellation pursuant to
paragraph $�a}„Lessee s�all be suthorized,after written approval by the City, to remave all fxture and
improvements it]ias �nade�o the Pr�mises du�ing the ter�of this L;ease,provided I,�ess�e returns the
Premises to�e condition:it was in�t the comznencement of tT�is I;�a�,
10. Notic�s. W1Yerever in tlais Lease it shail be,required;qr pern�itt�ci that r���i�e be giv$n
by either party to this Leas�to the other,sueh notice shall not be deemed to nave been,give�uriless in
writing antt forwarded by mail`as�ollows:
T"o the T.essee at: �ioltlen�alley Little League
ZUi��$r.00kvie�v parkv�►ay
iMinneapalis,Ivfin��sota 55�126
To the Lessor at: City'of�old'en Valley
Gblden�lalley Park an�l Reereation Director
200 Brookvi�w Parkway
Golden Valley,l�iinnesota SS426
11. Lease�old Imnravements Leasehold improvernenes may be mad'e w�ith priar
Vl�ritien consent of the City.and�mttst ateet all applicable City Codes, All speci�ca#ions and
Plans fox it�pravrements tr�ust be subrnitted to the City for 5aid writt�n approval.
Lessee sl�ail pay all cos�s and�x}aenses pf installation and maintenance o�'any and all
iit�provements to the property. All improv�ments,hereto or hereai�er t�nade to the property, will
remain with tihe property,at nd cost to the City,when the Lease is terrzutiated, unless the City has
giv�n written cor�sent to L;essee ro rsmove them.
�11 the�xovisions ofthis I.eas�are to be constrw�d as:covenants ai�d,agreements and sl�alt bind
and incir:�io#he bet�efit t�f the par�ies hereta,their respective heirs, legal representaEYves,successors
and permi'ttecl ass�grts,
3
Resolution 12-22 - Continued March 20, 2012
IN WTT'�E�S VJHEIt�OF,L.essor a�c�-I,sss�e have hereunto set their tYands and have cansed th`is
Lease to be execut�d as�ufthe tiay andy,ear first above written,
�ity of Golden Valley
:
By '
Its City Ivfanager �
By , /
Its ayor
STAT�OF IvI[NNESOTA. �
COtJNTY OF�t'l��1C 11�-� ss
The foregoing instrum�nt was aCkhowledged before me thi� day of ��+Y�� , �QOf by
' Q�_and�, % r t�� the '. . ' and ` of`the City:of
Gql en Valley,a iinnesota mun'icipal orpotation,on behalf of the co "orat'rc��, rantor,
. . .,. ..,�v �r /� .
Y�� � � ���
� JUDffH A NAU:Y
.��� NOTAi1YPU8UC-MINNESQFA '�� Notany Pub1iC
`' •. . My C0111n1�011 F�'tres Jan.31,2N5 + i
V
Cvlden Valley Little L�ague,Inc,
, ,,
BY� L`t ;
Tts r-_ • �-�
STATE OF MINNESO'TA �
COUNTY OF�tne ss
� �� The fore oing instrum�qt as �ek�aw1edged before me this •, da of
�/�lpyrl�¢s�'u'n,.��e�,-- �,�� ��� y �l'(.� �'G• , ?001 by
, �the. ,� ic;�`��u."7� oF t1�e Golden Valioy Little Leaguc,.:a Minn�so' on behalf nf
tt�e cc�rpnration;Grant'or.
�NJIMILF(E11,E'EWQn < . " ' , � y°
�����.�SDTA atary Public
A�'`Caau�sl4n ExpGes'Jan;91,2GOi :
T3115INS'C`RtlMG . � : 7'a,Y Stattments tl�r the real property iiescribad in tfii
Best&Flanagan LC�'(*) ir�strumcnt shauid be�ent to(irteTude namc and ncklrrss of
4000 U.S.Bar�k Pda�e (3��e�:
60 L Second Avenue Souti�
Mianeapolis,IVIN 'SS�?2-4331
(612)339-7�z]
4
Resolution 12-22 - Continued March 20, 2012
Exhibit 6
�
C'ro,�ii Ya�Gff�eL'�ae, �Sic
s.rvtn,v oo�a�iro van.y ro�.tl,lb.or.r so r.n.:
WHEREAS,Golden Valley Little League is in need of additional funds to meet its obligation to
the City of Golden Va11ey for the building of two fields at Honeywell Park, and VVI�REAS,the
City of Golden Valley,has agreed, subject to the apprnval of the city council,to loan to Golden
Va11ey Little League the sum of $27,500.00(Twenty-seven Thousand Five Hundred dollars and
no cents)and WHEREAS,such borrowing appears to be advantageous to the Golden Valley
Little League as it is on better terms Wan would be available elsewhere;be it:
RESOLVED,that Golden Va11ey Litt1e League borrow the sum of$27,SOOAO,and that said sum
be repa.id in or within five(5)years with interest thereon at 0.00%on the unpaid balance,all as
more fully set forth in a promissory note and collateral loan documents to be presented and
reviewed by Golden Valley Little League.
` The undersigned hereby certifies thai he/she is the duly elected and qualified officer and the
custodian of the books and records and a corporation duly forme�i pursuant to the laws of the
state of Minnesota and tha.t the foregoing is a true record of a resolution duly adopted at a
meeting af Golden Vailey Little Leagu�on March 7,2012 and that said meeting was held in
accordance with state law and the Bylaws of Goldett Vailey Little League,and that said
resolution is now in fiill force attd ef�ect without modification or rescission.
AS DESIGNATED BY T'HE BOARD,I have executed my name as President of Golden Vailey
Little League.
.,
March 7,20I 2
Peter Birkeland
President
Golden Valley Gittle League
YVV� V� (p..�:......
�1
• 11 �
City��ministr�txon/Council
763-593-8003/763-593-8109(fax)
� W _.. � 3.,� , _ _
� �. � � ,
Executive Summary
Golden Valley Council/Manager Meeting
September 9, 2014
Agenda Item
2. Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission
Prepared By
Thomas Burt, City Manager
Summary
Mayor Harris invited City of Medicine Lake Mayor Gary Holter to attend the meeting to discuss the
Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission.
Attachments
• Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission Information Sheets (3 pages)
' Cr�
Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission
.,
� � VISION STATEMENT: Stewardship of water resources to protect and enhance our
communities
OVERVIEW of COMMISSION: The BCWMC is a regional joint powers organization formed in 1969 to focus on flood
control along Bassett Creek. Since most of the flooding concerns have been addressed, the Commission now also
focuses on improving and protecting the water quality of Bassett Creek and the lakes,streams, and wetlands in
the watershed. The BCWMC includes all or parts of nine cities: Crystal, Golden Valley, Medicine Lake,
Minneapolis, Minnetonka, New Hope, Plymouth, Robbinsdale, and St. Louis Park. The Commission includes one
voting member from each of the nine member cities. A technical advisory committee comprised mostly of city
staff advises the Commission on capital projects and technical issues. The Commission works collaboratively with
cities, the County, and other partners to complete its work. A joint powers agreement (JPA) among the cities was
recently amended and signed by all nine cities extending the life of the JPA by 10-years to January 1, 2025.
COMMISSION ACTIVITIES:
• Implements projects and policies that improve and protect Bassett Creek and lakes, streams, ponds, and
wetlands throughout watershed
• Monitors water quality, performs studies, inventories resources
• Provides water resource education to residents, businesses, local officials, and city staff
• Provides watershed-wide coordination of activities and watershed "point of contact" for all stakeholders
COMMISSION FUNDING:The general funds (or operating budget) for the Commission comes from annual
assessments to member cities that are based 50% on area in the watershed and 50%on tax valuation of that area.
(See 2014 assessment table attached.) Grant funds and partnerships with other groups also provide funding and
support. Property taxes totaling approximately$1M are annually levied by Hennepin County on the Commission's
behalf. This funding is used for large capital projects such as streambank restoration projects and stormwater
ponds to protect and improve water quality and alleviate flooding.
MANAGEMENT PLANNING PROCESS: Watershed organizations must update their Watershed Management Plans once
every ten years. The Plan sets the goals and policies for managing surface water resources within the boundaries of the
BCWMC. The current 10-year Plan will expires later this year. The Commission began the process of updating its Plan
last year—first by gathering input from residents,city councils, city commissions and other groups. A Plan Steering
Committee has since been working with the Commission,TAC, and partnering State and local agencies to develop
appropriate goals and policies. (See Commission goals for its new Plan on next page.) Strategies and policies for
attaining the goals are being developed (and most have been approved by the Commission) in the areas of:
� Water quality and stormwater regulations
• Water quantity/flooding
• Groundwater
• Erosion control
• Stream restoration and protection
• Wetlands
• Ditches
• Recreation, habitat and wildlife
• Education and outreach
• Administration
Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission
7800 Golden Valley Road � Golden Valley, MN 55427 � www.bassettcreekwmo.ora � Established 1968
Crystal � Golden Valley � Medicine Lake � Minneapolis � Minnetonka � New Hope � Plymouth � Robbinsdale � St.Louis Park
Approved Goals
2014 Watershed Plan
• Manage the surface water resources of the watershed to meet or exceed state
standards and BCWMC water quality goals for wetlands, lakes, and streams.
• Improve the quality of stormwater runoff reaching the Mississippi River by reducing
nonpoint source pollution.
• Protect and enhance fish and wildlife habitat in the BCWMC.
• Consider aesthetics and recreational opportunities within the watershed when
completing BCWMC projects.
• Reduce stormwater runoff volume for the purposes of improving water quality.
• Protect against flood risks along the Bassett Creek trunk system.
• Protect human life, property, and surface water systems that could be damaged by
flood events.
• Reduce stormwater runoff rates and volumes to minimize flood problems, flood
damages, and the future costs of stormwater management systems.
• Provide leadership and assist member cities with coordination of intercommunity
stormwater runoff issues.
• Notwithstanding that which occurs from natural processes, minimize erosion and
sedimentation to protect the BCWMC's water resources and health, safety and welfare.
� Maintain or improve shoreland integrity and implement stream restoration measures to
maintain or enhance ecological functions as well as human health, safety, and welfare.
• Increase the quality and quantity of wetlands in the BCWMC.
• Protect the quantity and quality of groundwater resources.
• Manage public ditches in a manner that recognizes their current use as urban drainage
systems and as altered natural waterways.
• Raise awareness of the BCWMC's existence and its role in protecting and improving
water quality, minimizing flooding, and preserving the watershed's ecological functions
and aesthetics.
• Strengthen public confidence in the BCWMC's expertise and enable meaningful public
participation in the planning process and ongoing projects conducted by the BCWMC.
• Raise awareness of the impact that individuals, businesses, and organizations have upon
water resources and motivate these audiences to change personal/corporate behavior
that has a negative impact on the watershed.
� Minimize the spread and manage the adverse impacts of harmful aquatic invasive
species.
• Develop a greater understanding of climate change and its impact on water resources,
including stormwater infrastructure capacity and flooding, and develop strategies to
appropriately manage future impacts.
Bassett Creek.Watershed Management Commission
2014 Assessment
For Taxes Payable in Current Area
Community 2013 Percent Percent Avera e 2012 2014
2013 Watershed 9 2013 Assessmen ,qssessment
Assessment
Net Tax Capacity* of Valuation in Acres of Area Percent $461,045 $515,016 $490,345
Crystal $6,392,836 5.31 1,264 5.09 5.20 $24,941 $27,424 $25,504
Golden Valley $28,334,293 23.56 6,615 26.63 25.09 $115,080 $129,126 $123,033
Medicine Lake $743,280 0.62 199 0.80 0.71 $3,484 $3,909 $3,479
Minneapolis $7,984,657 6.64 1,690 6.80 6.72 $32,661 $35,236 $32,953
Minnetonka $8,079,544 6.72 1,108 4.46 5.59 $24,920 $28,464 $27,402
New Hope $6,929,451 5.76 1,252 5.04 5.40 $25,533 $27,648 $26,479
Plymouth $54,117,769 44.99 11,618 46.77 45.88 $209,101 $235,310 $224,959
Robbinsdale $2,128,605 1.77 345 1.39 1.58 $8,022 $8,479 $7,743
St.Louis Park $5,578,665 4.64 752 3.03 3.83 $17,303 $19,420 $18,792
TOTAL $120,289,100 100.00 24,843 100.00 100.00 $461,045 $515,045 $490,345
�"Z��1 t?� �
� Public Works Department
763-593-8030/763-593-3988(fax)
,� , . , . ��v �������� _ E%_��� � �����:� ,�������:�
�.� �� �� �� �u�
Executive Summary
Golden Valley Council/Manager Meeting
September 9, 2014
Agenda Item
3. Winter Parking Restrictions
Prepared By
Jeff Oliver, PE, City Engineer
Bert Tracy, Maintenance Manager
Mark Ray, PE, Street Maintenance Supervisor
Summary
Back�round
While the large snow events (2+ inches) generally receive a lot of inedia attention and fewer
vehicles are parked on the street, the City does plow the roads more frequently for snow events
less than 2 inches, icy roads, and to address key areas of concern. According to the Minnesota
Climatology Working Group (data through 2011), the average number of days with a 2+ inch
snowfall is 7.4 per season. The average number of days with a 1-to 2-inch snowfall is 7.0 days
and the average number of days with measureable snowfall (anything over 0.1 inches) is 37.3
days. Ideally, staff is plowing or treating the streets in the early morning so there is less traffic for
drivers to contend with which is safer and more efficient. This proposed parking restriction will
be another tool in the City's winter snow and ice control efforts.
last winter, a resident contacted the City Council with a concern about the safety of City
snowplows due to vehicles parked on the street. At the May 13, 2014 Council/Manager meeting,
the Council directed staff to prepare a recommended City Code revision prohibiting on-street
parking during the winter months. Staff discussed the proposed restrictions with the Council at
the July 8, 2014 Council/Manager meeting. Based on feedback from the Council, the proposed
City Code revisions were approved at the July 15, 2014 (first consideration) and at the
August 6, 2014 Council meetings (second consideration).
City Councit Members expressed the desire to make sure the revised on-street parking
restrictions were clearly communicated to City residents. An article was in the July/August edition
of the City newsletter. A more detailed article will be in the September/October and
November/December City newsletters. Closer to November, an article will be put on the City's
website and Facebook reminding residents of the change. A flyer with information will also be
distributed at this year's Mighty Tidy Day and Fall Leaf Drop-Off events. Additionally, Channel 12
did a brief story on the restrictions in late July. It should also be noted this item was removed
from the Consent Agenda on both occasions when presented to the City Council so that staff
could give an explanation of the proposed restrictions for those in the audience and home
viewers.
Finally, the City has purchased one sign with the restrictions and has an order in place for another
17 signs to be posted at key locations around the City. Based on comments at the
September 2, 2014 Council meeting,the order for the 17 signs has been placed on hold.
Other Citv Ordinances
Below is a summary of what neighboring cities use for on-street parking restrictions:
• Crystal: No on-street parking year round between 2 am and 5 am. No on-street parking
after a snowfall of 1.5 inches or more until the street is plowed to the curb.
� Edina: No on-street parking between 1 am and 6 am from November 1 through March 1.
No on-street parking after a snowfall of 1.5 inches or more until the street is plowed to
the curb.
• Minnetonka: No on-street parking year round between 2 am and 6 am.
� New Hope: No on-street parking year round between 2 am and 6 am. No on-street
parking after a snowfall of 1.5 inches or more until the street is plowed to the curb.
• Plymouth: No on-street parking year round between 2 am and 5 am. No on-street parking
after a snowfall of 2.5 inches or more until the street is plowed to the curb.
• Robbinsdale: On-street parking is prohibited any time there is a snowfall of 2 inches or
more until the street is plowed to the curb.
• St Louis Park: On-street parking is prohibited any time there is a snowfall of 3 inches or
more until the street is plowed to the curb.
The First and Second Consideration of the Code Amendments to Winter Parking Restrictions have
already been adopted by City Council, published in the SunPost, as legally required.
. Should the Council direct staff to make further revisions, the revisions would need another First
and Second Consideration at future Council meetings which would not allow much time to
provide updated information to residents before Winter.
i/i'W� M"� �Y.u� ��yg��
Y 1�'f ;;�.�,,� . .
Plannin De artment
� r
763-593-8095/763-593-8109(fax)
Executive Summary
Golden Valley Council/Manager Meeting
September 9, 2014
Agenda Item
4. Minneapolis Residential Construction Management Agreement
Prepared By
Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager
Summary
Staff will be present to discuss with Council the Residential Construction Management
Agreement adopted by the City of Minneapolis this past April. The agreement, which must be
signed by the builder, outlines conditions that must be followed for every demolition, new
construction, or major remodel of one and two family homes. It attempts to regulate the issues
which most often have negative impacts on immediate neighbors, including: hours of operation,
noise, location and maintenance of dumpsters, site clean-up, erosion control, and methods of
communication with the neighborhood.
Attachments
• Minneapolis Construction Management Agreement (4 pages)
Minneapolis Residential Construction Management Agreement
This agreement applies to all un-occupied construction projects of wrecking, new build,or major remodeling of 1
and 2 unit dwelling structures.
The undersigned hereby acknowledges that they are responsible for complying with the conditions listed below. Failure to do so may
result in fines and/or construction delays.
Project Address:
Permit# Date Issued: Proposed Start Date: Proposed Completion Date:
Applicant Name: Applicant Contact Name:
Applicant Address:
Applicant Office Phone: Applicant Cell Phone:
Applicant Signature: Date:
Contractor Name: Contractor Contact Name:
Contractor Address:
Contractor Office Phone: Contractor Cell Phone:
Contractor Signature: Date:
This agreement must be attached to approved site plans and be present on-site at all times during active construction.
Failure to post and follow agreement may result in fees/fines and/or immediate STOP Work orders.
1. Hours of Operation: Operation of construction equipment is allowed only between the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 6:00
p.m., Monday through Friday and shall not be allowed to take place during federal holidays. Operation of
construction equipment outside of these hours and days without an after-hours permit from the Minneapolis
Health Department is prohibited. (Minneapolis Code 59.30) Each day of failure to obtain a permit or maintain
compliance with an issued permit constitutes a separate violation of this Code.
2. Noise Reduction: All contractors shall plan for and effectively implement measures that prevent adverse effects
upon adjacent property owners including the public right of way as set forth in section 389.60. The Contractor
shall implement reasonable measures to mitigate nuisance noise by limiting use of noise generating equipment,
vehicles, and avoid using such equipment in immediate proximity to an adjacent residential use to the extent
reasonable.
3. Approved Plans: An approved/stamped set of building(construction)plans shall be present and available on site
at all times as required by Minnesota State Building Code (MSBC)1300.0130.
4. Contact Information: Prior to any work done on the construction site, a Contractor sign must be installed
identifying the Developer and Contractor company name, contact name and current accessible phone numbers for
each person identified, the address of the project, and a contact number for the City of Minneapolis to report
problems (311/911 or other as directed by City of Minneapolis Staf�. The sign shall be 24"x 36" in size with
readable lettering as viewed from the street. All information posted must remain current and the sign must be
posted, without obstruction, in the front yard and visible from the street of the project site.
5. Nei�hbor Notification: Prior to any work done on the project site, an informational meeting shall be held to
notify neighbors within 300 feet of the subject properiy. Mailing labels are available through Hennepin County
Property Division. The meeting with neighbors shall be held at least fifteen(15)calendar days prior to
construction. Notification of the meeting with neighbors shall be in writing, at least fifteen (15)calendar days in
advance of the meeting date. Topics discussed must include hours of operation, after hour work request to use
construction equipment, construction schedule (demolition, excavation, deliveries, concrete work, and completion
MCMA 4/14
date), drainage plan, erosion and sediment control, dumpster location,noise mitigation, dust control, portable
bathroom location, debris removal schedule, site placement for materials, equipment, idling regulations, etc. The
Contractor shall maintain, for the record,the meeting notice, agenda, sign-in sheet and other documentation to
confirm the meeting requirements are met. Upon request of the City, notification and agenda shall be available for
review.
6. Dumpsters and Street Use: Minnesota State law requires a five foot(5')parking setback from driveways and a
thirty foot(30') setback from intersections. When possible, dumpsters shall be located completely on project site.
If street use is required, permits will be issued in 30 day increments only and may be renewed up to a total of 120
days. Permits may be obtained on-line and a copy of the permit must be placed with building permit on-site. A
readable copy of the permit must be attached to the dumpster with active dates visible. Dumpsters must be
covered during all non-work hours.
7. Debris/Dumpster Maintenance: All debris will be contained on project site. Regularly scheduled trash and debris
removal shall be completed by contractar during the course of construction. Dumpsters shall be removed only
during approved hours of operation. (MSBC 3302) Area around the dumpster shall be neat and orderly.
8. Buildin�Materials: All deliveries to the site shall be permitted to site within approved hours of operation, on an
as-needed basis. Limited stockpiles of building supplies located on site must be neat and orderly with materials
that will be used within 5 days. Long-term (over 5 days) stockpiles of buildings supplies are prohibited. (MSBC
3301.2)
9. Idlin�of Vehicles Generators and Other Equipment: No equipment,construction vehicles, or construction crew
vehicles shall be in operation outside of approved hours of operations. All vehicles, generators, and equipment
must comply with Minneapolis noise ordinance(Chapter 389).
10. Work Crew Parkine: Contractor/employee parking shall comply with all applicable parking regulations, including
but not limited to compliance with no parking zones or other on-street parking restrictions as well as snow
emergencies and winter parking restrictions.
11. Site and Surrounding Maintenance: The Contractor shall keep the site, all streets, all sidewalks, alley, boulevard
areas and adjacent properties clean from equipment,waste, materials, or refuse from operations of a construction
site. Equipment and materials not used on the work site shall be promptly removed and the site shall be
maintained in a neat and orderly condition at all times. All cans, containers, paper, plastic, etc.,that are not
needed for construction shall be removed and cleared from the site each evening prior to leaving construction site.
When public property(street, alley, sidewalk) is used or crossed during the construction period, the project crew
will remove all materials by the end of the working day and clear all debris and tracking marks. No materials
may be deposited or stockpiled on the public streets, boulevards, alleys, or sidewalks. At the end of each work
day,the contractor shall remove any soil that washed or was deposited on any public sidewalk, alley or street and
shall remove any trash or debris that washed or was deposited on any public property. All such public property
shall be left in as good a condition as it was before such work was commenced. No portable toilets, building
materials, or equipment may be stored on a public street, sidewalk, or boulevard area without appropriate and
current permits obtained by Minneapolis Public Works(Traffic & Parking Services). (MSBC 3306.8, 3301.2,
3308.1).
12. Trackin�rt: Tracking of dirt onto public roads during hauling and general day-to-day construction operations
will require periodic cleaning of these roadways (MSBC 3306.8). Soil and sediment deposited onto public and/or
private pavement areas shall be removed periodically and at the end of each work day. Sweeping may be ordered
at any time if conditions warrant. When a drive is used,the Contractor shall install a vehicles drive access of
large (3/4+) aggregate material in an effort to minimize tracking of dirt from site. The location of the construction
drive area shall be noted on Construction site plans posted at site.
13. Dust Control: The Contractor is responsible for all dust control efforts. The Contractor shall be required to
respond appropriately to any verbal or written notice from the City regarding dust control within one (1) hour of
MCMA 4/14
notification. Notification may be sent via voicemail or email. The Contractor is responsible for maintaining a
current phone number and email address. When feasible,the Contractor shall, in repairing or tearing down
buildings, or in removing debris from any buildings, shall keep all such debris, when appropriate,thoroughly
dampened with water so as to prevent the dust there from flying around the neighborhood where any such
building is located. (Minneapolis Code 93.120) Alternative dust control measures may be required during below-
freezing temperatures.
14. Winter Conditions/Street Cleanin Street Repair: The Contractor shall comply with all snow removal, snow
emergency, and street maintenance/repair regulations for street usage and sidewalk clearing. (Minneapolis Code
430)
15. Restrooms: When possible, portable toilets shall be located completely on back side of project site and not within
fifteen feet(15')of an adjacent property living space/structure. No portable toilets may be placed on a public
street, sidewalk, or boulevard area without obtaining a permit from Minneapolis Public Works. Contractors are
required to monitor and secure the portable toilets and immediately replace any that are leaking.
16. Damage to Public Propertv: The Contractor is responsible for repairing any damage to public streets, sidewalks,
boulevards (including trees), land, curbs, gutters, or sewers, The Contractor shall provide pictures of the existing
conditions of the curb, sidewalk and street, boulevard, boulevard trees adjacent to the property prior to any
demolition or construction. When damage occurs or if pavement is disrupted, repairs must be completed within
three(3)working days, unless the Contractor has received written permission from City staff to delay repairs to a
later specified date. The Contractor shall obtain written permission/approval from the City Engineer for all
repairs.
17. Protection of Adjoinin�Propertv: Adjoining public and private property shall be protected from damage during
construction, remodeling and demolition work. All structures on adjoining properties, including fences, must be
protected from construction work. Provisions shall be made to control water runoff and erosion during
construction or demolition activities. Excavations for any purpose shall not remove lateral support from any
footing or foundation without first protecting the footing or foundation against settlement or lateral translation.
18. Tree Protection: When reasonable, protective fencing shall be installed around all boulevard trees and/or trees
along lot line that are intended to be saved. If excavation occurs within a significant tree canopy of a neighboring
tree, a tree preservation plan must be submitted as part of wrecking permit and/or as part of the building site plan.
19. Survev: Prior to any demolition or construction an as-built survey and topographic survey must be submitted as
part of the site plan review and is required to note the front and side yard setbacks on directly contiguous
properties on the sides of the home. For properties on corner lots, contiguous properties must be included in
survey. As-build surveys are required to be submitted during the course of construction.
a. An as-built survey indicating the floor level of the existing home at the main entry must be submitted
with an application for a demolition permit.
b. An as-built survey indicating the top of foundation and structure setbacks must be submitted prior to
foundation backfill approvaL
c. An as-built survey indicating actual site conditions including all structures and contours must be
submitted prior to final building permit approval.
The Contractar shall submit a final certified as-built survey prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.
20. Erosion & Sediment Control: The Contractor shall conduct all activity in a manner designed to minimize surface
runoff, erosion and sedimentation. Proper erosion and sediment control measures shall be provided to prevent
soils from being deposited onto adjacent properties, rights-of-way, public storm drainage systems, wetlands or
watercourses. At a minimum, all graded surfaces, ground cover, erosion and sediment control measures, and
drainage structures or means shall be daily inspected,maintained and repaired during construction and until all
disturbed areas have been permanently stabilized. Erosion Control Permits must be obtained, when necessary,
prior to construction and Erosion Control Plans, when necessary, must be submitted prior to plan approval.
(Minneapolis Code 52)
MCMA 4/l4
21. Surface Drainaee: The Contractor shall ensure a survey includes spot elevations and contour line in sufficient
detail to depict the existing and proposed drainage patters of the site. The location of all existing and proposed
gutter downspout, sump pumps and/or drain tile discharges shall also be shown. It must demonstrated that the
proposed condition do not adversely impact adjacent properties or right-of-way as it relates to surface drainage.
The Contractor must protect all storm drain inlets with sediment capture devices prior to soil disruption that may
result in sediment laden storm water runoff entering the inlet. The Contractor shall provide effective stor►n drain
inlet protection over the life of the project until all surfaces with potential for discharging sediment to an inlet
have been stabilized. The Contractor is responsible for preventing or minimizing the potential for unsafe
conditions, flooding, or siltation problems. (Minneapolis Code 52.270)
22. Ground Water: When appropriate, discharges of groundwater from a construction site occurring during
construction will require a Temporary Water Discharge Permit. A Temporary Water Discharge Permit does not
permit discharge of groundwater to the City sewer system or right-of-way upon completion of the project.
Projects shall be suitably designed and undertaken in a manner that does not rely on permanent groundwater
discharge. It is the owner's responsibility to thoroughly evaluate the groundwater conditions of the site and select
designs/practices accordingly. When appropriate, groundwater elevations and analysis may need to be provided
prior to approval of plans.
23. Chan�es to Site Plan: The proposed project shall be built to the final plans approved by the City of Minneapolis.
The Zoning Administrator may authorize minor changes in the placement and size of improvements and the type
of exterior materials for an approved site plan, if the changes are required because of conditions that were
unknown at the time the permit was approved, and/or the Zoning Administrator determines that the changes are
consistent with the intent of this chapter and the findings made by the City Planning Commission or Zoning
Administrator in connection with the approval of the site plan. Changes to the site plan affecting bulk regulations,
parking and loading, or components of the site plan other than minor changes in the placement and size of
improvements and the type of exterior materials(including windows and doors) shall require an amendment to the
site plan. The requirements for application and approval of a site plan amendment shall be the same as the
requirements for original application and approval. (Minneapolis Code: 530.100)
24. Complaints to Contractor, Developer or Site Staff• The Contractor shall maintain a log of all complaints and
comments received by the contractor/developer while permits are open. The Contractor shall also document all
resolutions to complaints. The log shall be made available within twenty-four(24) hours when requested by the
Planning Director or designee.
25. Stop Work Order: If the building official or designee finds any work regulated by the code being performed in a
manner contrary to the provisions of the code or in a dangerous or unsafe manner, the building official may issue
a stop work order. The stop work order shall be in writing and issued to the owner of the property involved,to the
owner's agent, or to the person doing the work. Upon issuance of a stop work order,the cited work shall
immediately cease. The stop work order shall state the reason for the order and the conditions under which the
cited work will be permitted to resume. MSBC 1300.0170
MCMA 4/14
c;ity of
Plannin D e artment
� r
763-593-8095/763-593-8109(fax)
Executive Summary
Golden Valley Council/Manager Meeting
September 9, 2014
Agenda Item
5. Subdivision Regulations/Large Lot Zoning/Moratorium
Prepared By
Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager
Summary
Staff will be present to discuss with Council the recent issues related to residential subdivisions in
Golden Valley.
Any possible revisions to the Subdivision Code, including changes to the listed conditions af
approval or denial for minor subdivisions, should be checked with the City Attorney to ensure the
City is not exceeding its authority as outlined in Minnesota Statute.
Modifying the City's Zoning Code to reflect some new type of large lot zoning can be done, but
the process for doing so must be carefully structured and studies and data provided to support
the action. It is likely that the City would need to hire a land use consultant to carry out this effort
and to ensure it was properly enacted.
A moratorium on residential subdivisions would need to be tied to a study or potential changes in
regulations—one option is the large lot zoning change described above. During this time, any
planning cases that had already entered the queue via an application would be allowed to
continue through the process. The moratorium would be set for a specific amount of time (not to
exceed one year) but could be ended early if appropriate.
G l��1 t��
Admini r i
st at vc Scrviccs ��r�artm�nt
763-593-8013/763-593-3969(fax)
��� ��.-� ,_ ������.� �,
Executive Summary For Action
Golden Valley Council/Manager Meeting
September 9, 2014
Agenda Item
6. Proposed 2015-2016 Other Funds Biennial Budget
Prepared By
Thomas Burt, City Manager
Susan Virnig, Finance Director
Summary
At the September 9 Council/Manager meeting, Council will be reviewing the following budgets:
• Conservation/Recycling Fund (Enterprise)
� Human Services Fund (Special Revenue)
We will discuss the remaining budgets at the October 14 Council/Manager Meeting. Those
remaining are the Water and Sewer Utility Fund, Storm Sewer Utility Fund, Vehicle Maintenance
Fund, Motor Vehicle Licensing Fund and Brookview Golf Course Fund.
Conservation/Recyclin� (Enterprise Fund):
2015 Proposed Revenue $401,645
2015 Proposed Expenditures 451 460
Decrease in Net Position ($49,815)
2016 Proposed Revenue $443,220
2016 Proposed Expenditures 462 630
Decrease in Net Position ($19,410)
Overall Outlook:
Rates will need to be increased from $12 per quarter to $14 per quarter in 2016 to keep
providing the current recycling program to the residents. It will be dependent on the recycling
rebate that we receive from the provider and the County Grant.
The budget reflects a transfer amount to the General Fund as outlined below:
Overhead Charges $51,500
The projected net position at 12/31/14 is $945,098.
The projected net position at 12/31/15 is $895,283.
The projected net position at 12/31/16 is $875,873.
Human Services Foundation (Special Revenue Fund):
2015 Proposed Revenue $60,500
2015 Proposed Expenditures 67 100
Decrease in Fund Balance ($6,600)
2016 Proposed Revenue $60,500
2016 Proposed Expenditures 67 100
Decrease in Fund Balance ($6,600)
Overall Outlook:
The Commission presents their allocation report in December.
The projected fund balance at 12/31/14 is $152,690.
The projected fund balance at 12/31/15 is $146,090.
The projected Fund balance at 12/31/16 is $139,400.
Attachments
• 2015-2016 Conservation/Recycling Operating Budget (9 pages)
• 2015-2016 Human Services Fund Operating Budget (5 pages)
CITY OF GOLDEN VALIEY
CONSERVATION/RECYCLING FUND
REVENUE DETAIL
Actua12012 Actua12073 Adopted 2014 Es[imated 2014 �.�` .:.. ���� proposed 2015 Concept2076
Percent Percent Percent Percent percent Percent
Revenue Amount of Total Amount of Total Amount of Total Amount of Total Amount of Total Amount of Total
FEMA Disaster Granl 0 57,558 13J% 0
State Aid-Disaster Grant 0 19,186 4.6% 0
CountyGrant 56,859 16.4% 56,773 13.5% $56,500 14.0% $56,770 14.6% '- $56,770 14.1% $56,770 12.8%
RecyclingCharges (1) 276,190 79.5% 276,099 65.8% 332,400 82.5% 320,000 82.5% 332,675 82.9% 373,950 84.4%
�.ry
�:
MightyTidyDaycharges 8,876 2.6% 8,106 1.9% 9,000 2.2% 9,000 2.3% = 9,000 2.2% 9,000 2.0%
�:..
InterestEamings 5,602 1.6% 2,200 0.5% 5,000 12% 2,200 0.6% ��-���_. 3,000 07% 3,500 0.8%
TOTALS j347,527 700.0% E419,922 700.0°k 5402,900 100.0% $387,970 100.0% �< A�� �##ji�;-��.: $401,64b 100.0°k 5443,220 100.0%
Notes:
(1) Based on the following quarlerly charges to residential units:
� Apnl April
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Single-Family (Up to a 4-Plex) $8.00 $10.00 $10.00 $10.00 E12.00 $72.00 514.00
CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY
2015-2016 OPERATING BUDGET
DIVISION: Recycling(081) PROGRAM: Recycling(7001)
2015% 2016%
2012 2013 2014 2014 2015 2015 2016 OVER 2014 OVER 2015
OBJECT DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL ADOPTED ESTIMATED CONCEPT PROPOSED CONCEPT ADOPTED PROPOSED
Suqqlies and Services � �� �'�
6320 OperatingSupplies $5,000 $10,609 $3,000 $3,000 .. $3,000 $3,000 0.00% 0.00%
6340 Professional Services 239,425 340,950 330,950 309,905 '":;;, 335,320 345,000 1.32 k 2.89%
6342 Postage 677 3,791 8,900 8,995 �a f, 8.500 8,600 -4.49% 1.18%
6352 General Notices 8 Information 3,207 3,958 7,750 7,750 ��-�:�. 6,750 6,750 -12.90% 0.00%
6440 Contractual Services - 45,035 51,535 '� 46,390 47,780 3.01% 3.00%
TOTAL Supplies and Services 248,309 359,308 395,635 381,185 � 399,960 411,130 1.09% 2.79%
Transfers
7220 Overhead TransfeaGeneralFund 51,500 51,500 51,500 51,500 : 51,500 51,500
7220 Overhead Transfer-Street Debt Service - - _ _ _ _
7220 Overhead Transfer-Equipment CIP 23,600 - - _ _ _
7220 Overhead Transfer-Storm Utility
TOTAL Transfers 75,100 51,500 51,500 51,500 51,500 51,500 0.00% 0.00%
�:a-
��
TOTALS $323,409 $410,808 $447,135 $432,685 '; , $451,460 $462,630 0.97% 2.47%
RECYCLING Program 7001
6320-Operating Supplies
4
Descri tion 2012 Actual 2013 Actual Adopted Estimate Proposed Concept
Sup lies for Mi ht Tid or events with
Rec clin 5,000 10,609 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000
,.
-. _.m
Traffic Control Si ns -
...�-
�„.
"Re ublic/Allied Contract started Janua 2012 and is
responsible for rovidin all rec clin containers ��
In 2013,a storm event created more costs. � �
$5,000 $10,609 $3,000 $3,000 $,;; � $3,000 $3,000
RECYCLING Program 7001
6340-Professional Services
2014 2014 2015 2016
Descri tion 2012 Actual 2013 Actual Adopted Estimate x �� Proposed Concept
�,� , ;
Residential Curbside Rec clin 240,733 241,063 217,950 218,385 �� - �_= 222,320 227,100
(includes credits for roduct) (80,108) (42,482) (10,000) �_.;: ;��;
2012-2.52 per CDU
2013-2.57 er CDU x����
2014-2.62 per CDU
2015-2.67 er CDU
2016-2.73 er CDU
Republic/Allied Waste 2012-2019
Sprin Brush Pick-u Pro ram 63,025 60,914 68,000 56,520 �t 68,000 71,400
Fall Leaf pro off Pro ram 14,741 6,290 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,650
Leaf Dro Dis osal 7,910 17,000 17,000 � � 17,000 17,850
�
Video-Northwest Cable
Le al Service for Rec clin Contracts 216 � ��
commericial/industrial/institutional s:�
,,
�
Mi ht Tid Da -Cost for Dro off 10,737 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000
�
Crate Picku 817
Storm Cleanup-June 21 Cit ide Picku 56,518
Mulch E�
<�
m�:�..
s;�;
;�::
��:r:.
$239,424 $340,950 $330,950 $309,905 ~ $335,320 $345,000
RECYCLING Program 7001
6342-Postage
� 2Q14 2014 ���"� 2015 2016
Descri tion 2012 Actual 2013 Actual Adopted Estimate F<. Proposed Concept
Mailin s:
Brush Pick-u Postcards 1,231 1,800 2,395 ;� 1,800 1,800
Leaf Dro Off Postcards 1,800 1,800 ` ����,�, 1,800 1,800
cit newslettershare 677 760 2,300 1,000 �a=�� 1,100 1,200
Mi ht Tid Da share 1,800 1,000 1,800
; � ; 1,800 1,800
new rec clin pro ram �.�
Hennepin Count 2,000 2,000 � 2,000 2,000
�_: :
�t_::�:: ...
_��
�
..m_ .
$677 $3,791 $8,900 $8,995 _,�;_�_�.� �r � $8,500 $8,600
RECYCLING Program 7001
6352-General Notices and Public Information
2014 2014 2015 2016
Descri tion 2012 Actual 2013 Actual Adopted Estimate 3 Pro osed Concept
Cit Newsletter(Rec clin Pa e) 1,395 1,594 1,500 1,500 " 1,500 1,500
Brush Pick-u Postcard 720 715 750 750 , �_ 750 750
�,,�
Leaf Dro Off Postcard 1,092 612 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500
with Mi ht Tid in 2012
Rec clin Brochure
Mi ht Tid Da Postcard 1,037
New Rec clin Pro ram Postcard
Hennepin Count Joint Effort Publications A,000 4,000 3,000 3,000
�� �.n
��=.-.
rt:� �:
...� .
$3,207 $3,958 $7,750 $7,750 ° $6,750 $6,750
RECYCLING Program 7001
6440-Contracutal Services
2012 2013 2014 2014 2015 2016
Descri tion Actual Actual Adopted Estimate Proposed Concept
Sentence to Serve Pro�ects 0 0 45,035 45,035 46,390 47,780
Emer enc Notification Software 6,500 :
throu h Gov delive �
�:
,.�� :.
'�..:.r
...�:
����:
x:
��.,=�.:
$0 $0 $45,035 $51,535 �� ���_� $46,390 $47,780
RECYCLING Program 7001
7220 Overhead Transfers
2014 2014 2015 2016
Descri tion 2012 Actual 2013 Actual Adopted Estimate ' : Proposed Concept
Transferto General Fund 51,500 51,500 51,500 51,500 fS� 51,500 51,500
Transfer to Equipment Fund 23,600
��.: :
�a..
�:��.�.
�.������
�=
�=35 ��� a
,.W.
:=��::.
�=_�
���:
a»;:�..,:
� ��=._'��
�:�:
$75,100 $51,500 $51,500 $51,500 � 0. � $51,500 $51,500
CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY
CONSERVATION/ RECYCLING FUND
Net Position *
Net Assets @ 01/01/14 $989,813
Estimated Revenue-2014 $387,970
Estimated Expenses-2014 432,685
Excess of Revenue Over(Under) Expenses (44,715)
Estimated Net Position @ 12/31/14 $945,098
Proposed Revenue-2015 401,645
Proposed Expenses -2015 451,460
Excess of Revenue Over(Under) Expenses (49,815)
Projected Net Position @ 12/31/15 $895,283
Concept Revenue -2016 (1) 443,220
Concept Expenses -2016 462,630
Excess of Revenue Over(Under) Expenses (19,410)
Projected Net Position @ 12/31/16 $875,873
" Net Position is defined as current assets minus current liabilities.
(1) Rate increase of$2 per quarter
CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY
HUMAN SERVICES FUND
REVENUE DETAIL
Actual 2012 Actual 2013 Adopted 2014 Estimated 2014 �,.����-, Q� v�-., Proposed 2016 Concept 2016
Percent Percent Percent PerceM - Percent Percent
Revenue Amount of Total Amount of Total Amount of Total Amount of Total Amount of Total Amount of Total
LawfulGambGngProceeds $30,W5 45.0% $41,256 45.0% $25,000 41.3% $35,000 53.4% �:� ��.++,�,.- $30,000 49.6% $30,000 49.6%
�F
Fund Raising Proceeds 36,195 54.1% 50,042 54.6% 35,000 57.9% 30,000 45.6% .� rt��� 30,000 49.6% 30,000 49.6%
. '
Interest Earnings 631 0.9% 292 0.3% 500 0.8% 500 0.8% ��., 500 0.8% 500 0.8%
70TALS E66,901 100.0% E91,590 700.0% $60,500 100.0% E65,500 100.0% � � �'�����_ 560,500 100.0% $60,500 100.0%
(1) Calculated based on 10%of net profits of the chantable gambling operations operating in the City of Golden Valley.
These conMbutions are mandated by City ordinance as authonzed by State statute.
CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY
2015-2016 OPERATING BUDGET
DIVISION: Human Services(094) PROGRAM: Muman Services Fund(2020)
2012 2013 2014 2014 2015 2015 2016
OBJECT DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL ADOPTED ESTIMATED CflNCEPT « PROPOSED CONCEPT
Personal Services
6320 Supplies $12,779 $17,825 $13,000 $16,035 $17,100 $17,100
6440 Other Contractual Services 45,000 42,500 45,000 40,500 50,000 50,000
TOTAL Supplies and Services 57,779 60,325 58,000 56,535 ' 67,100 67,100
TOTALS $57,779 $60,325 $58,000 $56,535 � $67,100 $67,100
115
HUMAN SERVICES FUND Program 2020
6320-Operating Supplies
Description Actual Actual Adopted Estimate ��___ Proposed Concept
Fund raisin events
Run the Valle 5,781 5,083 6,000 4,535 6,000 6,000
GVHSF Golf Classic 6,998 7,074 7,000 7,500 ,___, 7,100 7,100
Taste of Golden Valley
Solicitation Letter 3,925 4,000 4,000 4,000
Solicitation Letter-GVCF 1/3 1,743
�-��'���
$12,779 $17,825 $13,000 $16,035 � ,,��p� $17,100 $17,100
HUMAN SERVICES FUND Program 2020
6440-Other Contractual Services
0 4 5
Description Actual Actual Adopted Estimate Proposed Concept
45,000 50,000 50,000
Home Free Shelter 2,500 2,500
PRISM 10,000 10,000 10,000 u- ;:
Tree House 5,000 2,500 3,500
Greater Minneapolis Crisis Nurse 5,000 5,000 3,000
Senior Community Services
Home Pro'ect 5,000 5,000 5,000
Outreach 3,500 3,500 3,500 F_...�
Suburban Dinner at Your poor 7,000 7,000 7,500
Crisis Connection 2,000 2,000 2,000 ;.
�.� ��
Community Mediation Pro ram 1,500 2,500 -`` �{;
��Wm�:..
Jewish Family&Children's Services 3,500 ��: ;:�
YMCA 5,000 ��`
The Brid e For Youth 3,500
$45,000 $42,500 $45,000 $40,500 � �a� $50,000 $50,000
CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY
HUMAN SERVICES FUND
WORKING CAPITAL ANALYSIS *
Working Capital @ 01/01/14 $143,725
Estimated Revenue - 2Q14 $65,500
Estimated Expenses - 2014 56,535
Excess of Revenue Over (Under) Expenses 8,965
Estimated Working Capital @ 12/31/14 $152,690
Proposed Revenue - 2015 60,500
Proposed Expenses - 2015 67,100
Excess of Revenue Over (Under) Expenses (6,600)
Projected Working Capital @ 12/31/15 $146,090
Concept Revenue - 2016 60,500
Concept Expenses - 2016 67,100
Excess of Revenue Over (Under) Expenses (6,600)
Projected Working Capital @ 12/31/16 $139,490
'� Working Capital is defined as current assets minus current liabilities.
�l�� ��
City Adrninistration/Council
763-593-8003/763-593-8109(fax)
� �._
��.....� � ;�� _..__ ���.��� ���������-�.����������;��t� ���������,�.� : �� - .
Executive Summary
Golden Valley Council/Manager Meeting
September 9, 2014
Agenda Item
7. Beyond the Yellow Ribbon Campaign
Prepared By
Thomas Burt, City Manager
Summary
Mayor Harris requested this item be placed on the agenda.