The URL can be used to link to this page

10-07-14 CC Council Agenda Packet (entire) AGENDA Regular Meeting of the City Council Golden Valley City Hall 7800 Golden Valley Road Council Chamber October 7, 2014 6:30 pm The Council may consider item numbers 1, 2, 3, 5 and 6 prior to the public hearings scheduled at 7 pm 1. CALL TO ORDER PAGES A. Roll Call B. Pledge of Allegiance - Teen Committee to lead Pledge and be recognized by Council C. Board/Commission Oath of Office and Presentation of Certificate of Appointment: Mr. Andrew Johnson to Planning Commission, Mr. Simon Gottlieb to Human Rights Commission and Mr. Richard Orenstein to Board of Zoning Appeals D. District 281 School District Referendum 2. ADDITIONS AND CORRECTIONS TO AGENDA 3. CONSENT AGENDA Approval of Consent Agenda - All items listed under this heading are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no discussion of these items unless a Council Member or citizen so requests in which event the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda. A. Approval of Minutes of City Council Minutes - September 16, 2014 3-11 B. Approval of Check Register 1. City 12 2. Housing and Redevelopment Authority 13 C. Licenses: 1. Solicitor's License - Garbage Man 14-16 2. Solicitor's License - Budget Exteriors, Inc. 17-19 D. Minutes of Boards and Commissions.- 1. ommissions:1. Planning Commission - August 25, 2014 20-30 2. Board of Zoning Appeals - August 26, 2014 31-35 3. Human Rights Commission - May 27, 2014 36-39 4. Joint Water Commission - July 2, 2014 40-42 5. Environmental Commission - July 28, 2014 43-44 6. Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission - July 17, 2014 45-52 E. Waiver of Public Hearing and Certification of Special Assessments 1. 2014 City-Wide Sanitary Sewer 14-75 53-55 2. 2014 PMP Sanitary Sewer 14-76 56-58 F. Appointment of Election Judges and Absentee Ballot Board for General Election 14-77 59-61 G. Receipt of Notice of Metropolitan Council Action - 305 & 345 Pennsylvania Ave S 62-64 H. Authorization to sign Police Sergeants (LELS Local 304) Agreement 65-84 I. Acceptance of Donations on behalf of City 14-78 85-86 J. Authorization for Submittal of Application for Hennepin Youth Sports Program 14-79 87-88 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS 7 PM A. Continued Public Hearing - Ordinance #527 - Rezoning 305 and 345 Pennsylvania 89-92 Avenue South - Lake West Development, LLC, Applicant B. Public Hearing - Preliminary Plat Approval - Sunnyridge Woods - 200 Meadow Lane 93-115 C. Public Hearing - Special Assessments - 2014 Miscellaneous Charges 14-80 116-119 D. Public Hearing - Special Assessments - 2014 Delinquent Utility Bills - Golden Valley 120-131 14-81 E. Public Hearing - Special Assessments - 2014 Delinquent Utility Bills - Minneapolis 132-135 14-82 5. OLD BUSINESS 6. NEW BUSINESS A. First Consideration - Ordinance #531 - Addition of Fats, Oil and Grease (FOG) 136-141 Ordinance B. Announcements of Meetings C. Mayor and Council Communications 7. ADJOURNMENT UNOFFICIAL MINUTES CITY COUNCIL MEETING vallc!'v GOLDEN VALLEY, MINNESOTA September 16, 2014 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Harris called the meeting to order at 6:30 pm. IA. Roll Call Present: Mayor Harris, Council Members Fonnest, Clausen, Schmidgall and Snope. 1B. National Anthem - Robbinsdale Cooper High School Chamber Singers 1C. Presentation of Awards - 2014 Photo Contest Mayor Harris presented the 2014 Photo Contest awards. 2. ADDITIONS AND CORRECTIONS TO AGENDA MOTION made by Council Member Clausen, seconded by Council Member Fonnest to approve the agenda of September 16, 2014, as revised: Amendment to Item 6A-Ordinance for Moratorium with replacement page for Ordinance 530 and addition of Items 3K- Board/Commission Appointments and 31--Receive and file correspondence regarding 6A- Ordinance #530 and the motion carried unanimously. 3. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA MOTION made by Council Member Snope, seconded by Council Member Clausen to approve the consent agenda of September 16, 2014 as revised: addition of Items 3K- Board/Commission Appointments and 31--Receive and file correspondence regarding 6A- Ordinance #530 and removal of items: 3F-Resolution for Joint Powers Agreement and 3J- Resolution Acceptance of Grant and Donation and the motion carried unanimously. 3A1. Approve Minutes of City Council Meeting - August 19, 2015 3A2. Approve Minutes of City Council Meeting - September 2, 2014 313. Approve City Check Register and authorize the payments of the bills as submitted. 3C. Approve Gambling License Exemption and Waiver of Notice Requirement - Good Shepherd Church. 3D. Accept for filing the Minutes of Boards and Commissions as follows: 1. Planning Commission - July 25, 2014 2. Human Services Fund - July 7, 2014 3E. Approve Authorization for the Mayor and City Manager to execute a Legal Services Agreement with Chestnut & Cambronne, P.A. for prosecution services for the period January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2018. 3F. Adept Resolution 14-72 AppFOVORg the i0iRt PeweFs AgFeement with Minneapolis and Golden Valley. 3G. Approve an Extension for Submittal of the Final PUD Plan Application and the Final Plat for The Towers at West End, PUD No. 107 until January 14, 2015 subject to certain conditions. 3H. To receive and file the August 2014 Financial Reports. 31. Adopt Resolution 14-73 for Approval of Plat for Golden Valley Homes. Unofficial City Council Minutes -2- September 16, 2014 3. ITEM ADDED TO THE CONSENT AGENDA 3K. Approve the following Boards and Commission Appointments and Terms: Planning Commission Board of Zoning Appeals Andy Johnson 1 year-expires 5/2015 Richard Orenstein 1 year-expires 5/2015 Human Rights Commission Simon Gottlieb 2 year-expires 5/2016 3L. To Receive and file correspondence regarding Item 6A-Ordinance #530 imposing a six month Moratorium on Subdivisions and PUDs. 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA 3F. Adopt Resolution 14-72 Approving Joint Powers Agreement with Minneapolis to Establish the Responsibilities for Sale of Water and Sewer Services within Golden Valley. Finance Director Virnig presented the staff report and answered questions from Council. MOTION made by Council Member Clausen, seconded by Council Member Snope to adopt Resolution 14-72 for a Joint Powers Agreement with the City of Minneapolis and the City of Golden Valley to establish responsibilities for the sale of Water and Sewer Services by the City of Minneapolis within the City of Golden Valley and the motion carried unanimously. 3J. Adopt Resolution 14-74 Accepting Donations on behalf of City of Golden Valley Council thanked the citizens who had donated to the City of Golden Valley. MOTION made by Council Member Fonnest, seconded by Council Member Snope to adopt Resolution 14-74 accepting donations on by half of the City of Golden Valley and the motion carried unanimously. 4. PUBLIC HEARING 4A. Public Hearing - Ordinance No. 528 -Approval of Conditional Use Permit#137, 601 Boone Avenue North, TruStone Financial, Applicant Planning Manager Zimmerman presented the staff report and answered questions from the Council. City Attorney Schelzel answered questions from the Council. Mayor Harris opened public hearing. No one came forward. Mayor Harris closed public hearing. There was Council discussion regarding the Conditional Use Permit located at 601 Boone Avenue North from TruStone Financial. MOTION made by Mayor Harris, seconded by Council Member Fonnest to amend finding number 9 to add a condition requiring landscaping along Highway 55 upon a vote being taken the following voted in favor of: Harris, Clausen, Fonnest and Snope and the following voted against: Schmidgall and the motion carried. MOTION made by Council Member Snope, seconded by Council Member Schmidgall to adopt Ordinance #528, Approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 137, 601 Boone Avenue North, TruStone Financial, Applicant and the motion carried unanimously. Unofficial City Council Minutes -3- September 16, 2014 4B. Public Hearing - Ordinance #529 - Final Plan for Carousel Automobiles PUD No. 95, Amendment 3 - 9191 and 9393 Wayzata Blvd - Twin Cities Automotive DBA Golden Valley TCA P., LLC, Applicant Planning Manager Zimmerman presented the staff report and answered questions from the Council. Mayor Harris opened public hearing. No one came forward. Mayor Harris closed public hearing. There was Council discussion regarding the Final Plan for Carousel Automobiles PUD located at 9191 and 9393 Wayzata Blvd from Twin Cities Automotive. MOTION made by Council Member Fonnest, seconded by Council Member Clausen to adopt Ordinance #529, Approval of the Final Plan of Development, Carousel Automobiles PUD No. 95, Amendment #3, Twin Cities Automotive DBA Golden Valley TCA P., LLC, Applicant and the motion carried unanimously. 4C. Public Hearing - Preliminary PUD Plan for Golden Villas PUD No. 118 - 9130 and 9220 Olson Memorial Hwy - Golden Villas, LLC, Applicant Planning Manager Zimmerman presented the staff report and answered questions from Council. Assistant City Manager Knauss answered questions from the Council. Mr. Bill Stoddard, the applicant, reviewed the application and answered questions from Council. Mayor Harris opened public hearing. No one came forward. Mayor Harris closed public hearing. There was Council discussion regarding the Preliminary PUD Plan for Golden Villas located at 9130 and 9220 Olson Memorial Highway from Golden Villas, LLC. MOTION made by Council Member Clausen, seconded by Council Member Snope to approve the Preliminary PUD Plan for Golden Villas PUD No. 118 subject to the following conditions with the addition of number 9 and the motion carried unanimously 1. The plans prepared by Gronberg & Associates, Inc., submitted with the application on July 25 and August 11, 2014, shall become a part of this approval. 2. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Engineering Division to Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager, dated August 18, 2014, shall become a part of this approval. 3. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Fire Department to Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager, dated August 18, 2014, shall become a part of this approval. 4. The final design shall be reviewed by the City prior to Final Plan approval. 5. All signage must meet the requirements of the City's Sign Code (Section 4.20). 6. A park dedication fee of$31,680 (2% of the estimated land value) shall be paid prior to approval of the Final Plat. 7. The Final Plat shall include "P.U.D. No. 118" in its title. 8. This approval is subject to all other state, federal, and local ordinances, regulations, or laws with authority over this development. 9. Applicant shall evaluate snow removal options for the site. Unofficial City Council Minutes -4- September 16, 2014 4C. Public Hearing - Preliminary PUD Plan for Golden Villas PUD - continued In addition the Council makes the following findings pursuant to City Code Section 11.55, Subd. 5(E): 1. The PUD plan is tailored to the specific characteristics of the site and achieves a higher quality of site planning and design than generally expected under conventional provisions of the ordinance. 2. The PUD plan preserves and protects substantial desirable portions of the site's characteristics, open space and sensitive environmental features including steep slopes, trees, scenic views, creeks, wetlands and open waters. 3. The PUD plan includes efficient and effective use (which includes preservation) of the land. 4. The PUD plan results in development compatible with adjacent uses and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and redevelopment plans and goals. 5. The PUD plan is consistent with preserving and improving the general health, safety and general welfare of the people of the City. 6. The PUD plan meets the PUD Intent and Purpose provision and all other PUD ordinance provisions. 4D. Public Hearing - Revision to Preliminary Plat - Kate's Woods - 221 Sunnyridge Lane - David Knaeble, Applicant Planning Manager Zimmerman presented the staff report and answered questions from Council. Mr. David Knaeble, applicant, reviewed the application and answered questions from Council. Mayor Harris opened public hearing. No one came forward. Mayor Harris closed public hearing. There was Council discussion regarding the revised Preliminary Plat for Kate's Woods located at 221 Sunnyridge Lane from Mr. Knaeble. MOTION made by Council Member Snope, seconded by Council Member Schmidgall to approve the revised Preliminary Plat for Kate's Woods, 221 Sunnyridge Lane, subject to the following conditions with addition of number 5 upon a vote being taken the following voted in favor of: Snope, Fonnest and Schmidgall and the following against: Harris and Clausen and the motion carried. 1. The City Attorney will determine if a title review is necessary prior to approval of the final plat. 2. A park dedication fee of$2,930 shall be paid before final plat approval. 3. The City Engineer's memorandum, dated March 17, 2014, shall become part of this approval. 4. All applicable City permits shall be obtained prior to the development of the new lots 5. The deck shall be modified or removed to comply with setbacks. 4E. Continued Public Hearing - Ordinance #527 -Amendments to Zoning Map - 305 and 345 Pennsylvania Avenue South - Lake West Development, LLC, Applicant Planning Manager Zimmerman presented the staff report and stated public hearing items 4E and 4F will be combined in this discussion, but voted on individually and answered questions from Council. Unofficial City Council Minutes -5- September 16, 2014 4E. Continued Public Hearing -Amendments Zoning Map - continued Mayor Harris opened public hearing. No one came forward. Mayor Harris closed public hearing. MOTION made by Mayor Harris, seconded by Council Member Snope to table Ordinance #527, Rezoning 305 and 345 Pennsylvania Avenue South, to the City Council meeting of October 7, 2014 and the motion carried unanimously. 4F. Continued Public Hearing - Preliminary PUD Plan for Laurel Ponds PUD No. 117 - 305 and 345 Pennsylvania Avenue South - Lake West Development, LLC, Applicant Planning Manager Zimmerman presented the staff report and answered questions from Council. City Attorney Schelzel answered questions from the Council. Mr. Donald Jensen, applicant, reviewed the changes to the application and answered questions from Council. Mayor Harris opened public hearing. Mr. Steve Devitt, 235 Pennsylvania Ave S, questioned as to how long the association will be in place and said he felt there should be an entry point from Laurel Avenue. Ms. Caryl Eschweiler, 420 Pennsylvania Ave S, asked where the sidewalks will be and if she will be assessed. She said she is concerned about traffic in the area and receiving wall cracks in her house during construction. She said her neighborhood appreciates the communication from the developer and that they would prefer a smaller development, but realized it is not realistic so this plan would be a good choice. Mr. Edward Ratner, 115 Oregon Ave S, said he would like a sidewalk up to Western Avenue. He asked who has the right-of-way coming from Pennsylvania Avenue and if some of the new homes would be handicap accessible. Mr. Bob Held, 265 Pennsylvania Ave S, said he supports the development but stated he is concerned about not having sidewalks. Mr. Mark Friederichs, 7501 Western Ave, said he felt there should only be 10 to 12 new homes built and that he does not want this development in his neighborhood. Mr. Shawn Orr, 421 Quebec Ave, said he did not want a mixed use project across from him so he was excited about this development. Ms. Avis Held, 265 Pennsylvania Ave S, said she supports the development but would prefer fewer houses. She said she is concerned about traffic on Pennsylvania and would like a sidewalk added from Laurel to Western. Mr. Jay Hesby, Treasurer for Speak The Word Church, 515 Jersey Ave S., said the Church is interested in selling their property and would like to see the project keep move along. Mr. Ronald Hunter, 7500 Ridgeway Rd, said he is concerned about three things: parking, more night noise, and traffic. Mr. Devitt stated he is concerned about financing of the units and stated he heard earlier that the developer may help with the cost for the sidewalks. Unofficial City Council Minutes -6- September 16, 2014 4F. Continued Public Hearing - Preliminary PUD Plan for Laurel Ponds - continued Mayor Harris closed public hearing. There was much Council discussion regarding the Preliminary PUD Plan for Laurel Ponds located at 305 and 345 Pennsylvania Avenue South from Lake West Development, LLC. MOTION made by Council Member Schmidgall, seconded by Council Member Fonnest to approve the Preliminary Plan for Laurel Ponds PUD No. 117 subject to the following conditions upon a vote being taken, following vote in favor of: Snope, Fonnest and Schmidgall and the following voted against: Harris and Clausen and the motion carried. 1. The plans prepared by EVS, dated 6/13/14, submitted with the application and the revised plan prepared by EVS, dated 9/10/14, shall become a part of this approval. 2. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Engineering Division to Mark Grimes, Community Development Director, dated July 10, 2014, shall become a part of this approval. 3. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Fire Department to Mark Grimes, Community Development Director, dated July 7, 2014, shall become a part of this approval. 4. The Applicant shall submit a lighting plan as part of the Final PUD Plan set. 5. All principal buildings shall conform to the rear and side property setbacks when adjacent to a single family zoning district as outlined in Section 11.55, Subd. 3(C)(1). 6. No buildings shall be located less than fifteen feet from the back of the curb line for roads that are part of the internal road system as outlined in Section 11.55, Subd, 3(C)(2). 7. Unless a wavier is granted by the City, any streets constructed within the development shall be public streets as required in Section 11.55, Subd. 6(A)(6). 8. The Applicant shall install sidewalks along Pennsylvania Avenue running the length of the property and on the east side of the property south to Laurel Avenue. 9. The easement reduction request from 55 feet to 45 feet will be considered pending review of an enhanced landscaping plan. 10. The Applicant shall prohibit the installation of fences within the development. 11. The Applicant is encouraged to explore a range of housing types and designs. 12. Building materials shall be reviewed by the City prior to Final Plan approval. 13. Permits to construct parking bays on the property at 7400 Laurel Avenue shall be obtained by that property owner and shall not be located closer than fifteen feet to the side property line, as required in Section 11.47, Subd. 6(B), unless a variance is obtained. 14. Any cross parking agreements that are created shall be submitted to the City for review and shall be recorded with the Final Plat. 15. The Final Plat shall include "P.U.D. No. 117" in its title. 16. The City Attorney shall determine if a park dedication fee is required for this project prior to Final Plan approval. 17. All signage must meet the requirements of the City's Sign Code (Section 4.20). 18. This approval is subject to all other state, federal, and local ordinances, regulations, or laws with authority over this development. 19. A stop sign shall be installed on the Applicant's property at Pennsylvania and Quebec In addition the Council makes the following findings pursuant to City Code Section 11.55, Subd. 5(E): 1. The PUD plan is tailored to the specific characteristics of the site and achieves a higher quality of site planning and design than generally expected under conventional provisions of the ordinance. 2. The PUD plan preserves and protects substantial desirable portions of the site's characteristics, open space and sensitive environmental features including steep slopes, trees, scenic views, creeks, wetlands and open waters. Unofficial City Council Minutes -7- September 16, 2014 4F. Continued Public Hearing - Preliminary PUD Plan for Laurel Ponds - continued 3. The PUD plan includes efficient and effective use (which includes preservation) of the land. 4. The PUD plan results in development compatible with adjacent uses and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and redevelopment plans and goals. 5. The PUD plan is consistent with preserving and improving the general health, safety and general welfare of the people of the City. 6. The PUD plan meets the PUD Intent and Purpose provision and all other PUD ordinance provisions. 6A. Ordinance #530, Imposing a Six Month Moratorium on Subdivisions and Planned Unit Developments that include Single Family Residential Components Planning Manager Zimmerman presented the staff report and answered questions from the Council. City Attorney Schelzel answered questions from the Council. MOTION made by Mayor Harris, seconded by Council Member Clausen to allow public comments regarding the moratorium upon a vote being taken, following vote in favor of: Harris, Fonnest, Snope and Clausen and the following voted against: Schmidgall and the motion carried. Mr. Norman Abramson, 212 Sunnyridge Circle, said he submitted one of the petitions. He read state statute 426.355 and said he felt it did not bar existing applications from the moratorium. He said he felt it would be silly to pass an application and later deem it should not have been passed. He encouraged Council to get an objective written legal opinion whether the moratorium could extend to existing applications. Ms. Ann Cooper, 316 Meander, said she lives in Golden Valley because of the great neighborhoods. She said she felt that the City values trees but added with the current construction practices the trees are no longer being taken care of. She said she felt some of the houses being built were not keeping with the architecture of the neighborhoods. She said the Council has an opportunity for stewardship and they should embrace it. Ms. Lois Lenarz, 117 Paisley Lane, read the letter that she submitted earlier which became part of the consent agenda under item 3L. Mr. Robert Kolasa, 117 Paisley Lane, asked what guidelines were used for the moratorium as to what percentage of a neighborhood can be subdivided and if the applications submitted in last few days are a matter of public record. Mr. Mark Dietz, 207 Sunnyridge Lane, said he submitted one of the petitions and stated the neighbors are concerned about the trees in their neighborhood. He said he attended the Planning Commission Meeting regarding 200 Meadow Lane where it was discussed that they would wait to make a decision until after Council discussed the moratorium even though they did not want to make the builder wait. He said he supports the strategic planning process. Ms. Diane Richard, 217 Paisley Lane, said many residents have concerns about the wild life, architectural style and water runoff in their neighborhood. She said she felt the Council should create a brand for the City and would like everyone to vote in favor of the moratorium. Mr. Mike Lougee, 206 Sunnyridge Lane, said he was late with his letter and he handed it to the Clerk to be added to the record and added he would like a definite legal opinion. Unofficial City Council Minutes -8- September 16, 2014 6A. Ordinance #530, imposing a Six Month Moratorium on Subdivisions - continued Ms. Bonnie Hoffman, 4020 Roanoke Circle, asked if she could see the neighborhood map as the item was discussed. Ms. Eva Lund, 4010 Roanoke Circle, said she supports the moratorium and felt that property rights should be monitored by the public entity. She said she would like these rights to be protected and defined within relationships. She said the reason she submitted the petition is she felt there should be an in-depth, thoughtful community process to identify the neighborhoods and protecting their rights not only as individual but collectively. Mary Jane Papas, 20 Ardmore Drive, said she speaking for herself and her husband. She said she is not against development, just irresponsible development. She said she agrees with what was said earlier and she appreciates the Council looking at a moratorium. Mr. Mark Friederichs, 7501 Western Ave, said he is concerned that the Laurel Ponds planned development in his neighborhood is for 30 homes. There was much Council discussion regarding the moratorium on Subdivisions and Planned Unit Developments containing residential and the possibility of adding existing subdivision applications under the moratorium. MOTION made by Council Member Clausen, seconded by Council Member Fonnest to adopt Ordinance #530, Imposing a Six Month Moratorium on Subdivisions and Planned Unit Developments that include Single Family Residential Components upon a vote being taken the following voted in favor of: Harris, Fonnest and Clausen and the following voted against: Schmidgall and Snope and the motion carried. 6B. Bottineau Transitway Update Planning Manager Zimmerman presented the staff report and answered questions from the Council. MOTION made by Council Member Schmidgall, seconded by Clausen, to receive and file Bottineau Transitway Update and the motion carried unanimously. 6C. Authorization to Sign First Amendment to Addendum to Purchase Agreement with The Investor Group, LLC for 2241 Legend Drive Assistant City Manager Knauss presented the staff report and answered questions from Council and stated there was an error on the purchase agreement under number 6 the word "miss" should be changed to "meet." There was Council discussion regarding the addendum to the purchase agreement for 2241 Legend Drive from The Investor Group. MOTION made by Council Member Fonnest, seconded Council Member Clausen to Authorize the City Manager to sign the First Amendment to Addendum to Purchase Agreement with Investor Group, LLC for 2241 Legend Drive with the word change on number 6 upon a vote being taken the following for: Harris, Snope, Clausen and Fonnest and following voted against; Schmidgall the motion carried. Unofficial City Council Minutes -9- September 16, 2014 6D. Announce of Meetings The 2015 - 2016 Pavement Management Program Open House No. 1 will be held on September 17, 2014, from 4:30 to 7 pm in the Council Chambers. The 2015 - 2016 Pavement Management Program Open House No. 2 will be held on September 18, 2014, from 4:30 to 7 pm in the Council Chambers. The Golden Valley Human Services Foundation Golf Event will be held on September 19, 2014, starting at 8 am at Brookview Golf Course. The 7t" Annual Lilac Party will be held on September 27, 2014, from 9 am to 1 pm at the Welcome Center located at 6681 Country Club Drive. A Council Neighborhood Meeting will be held on September 30, 2014, from 7 to 8:30 pm at the Chester Bird American Legion. The next City Council meeting will be held on October 7, 2014, at 6:30 pm in the Council Chambers. 6E. Mayor and Council Communication A letter was received from The Hidden Lakes Association to host a neighborhood meeting on October 28 at 7 pm at Regency Hospital. Council thanked the Golden Valley Days planning committee for a great event this year. Council recognized the retirement of Nate Gove, Police Commander, from the Golden Valley Police Department. Council acknowledged the September 11 National Day of Service & Remembrance sponsored by Human Rights Commission. 7. Adjournment MOTION made by Council Member Snope, seconded by Council Member Fonnest, and the motion carried unanimously to adjourn the meeting at 11:39 pm. Shepard Harris, Mayor ATTEST: Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk city 0 f :µl,i MEMORANDUM go t a e valley Finance Department 763-593-8013/763-593-8109(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting October 7, 2014 Agenda Item 3. B. 1. Approval of City Check Register Prepared By Sue Virnig, Finance Director Summary Approval of the check register for various vendor claims against the City of Golden Valley. Attachments • Document sent via email Recommended Action Motion to authorize the payment of the bills as submitted. city 0 gowenvvIr MEMORANDUM Finance Department � 763-593-80131763-593-8109(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting October 7, 2014 Agenda Item 3. B. 2. Approval of Housing and Redevelopment Authority Check Register Prepared By Sue Virnig, Finance Director Summary Approval of the check register for various vendor claims against the Housing and Redevelopment Authority. Attachments • Document sent via email Recommended Action Motion to authorize the payment of the bills as submitted. Cl ty a�l!'Ar gotaen 'll, MEMORANDUM In vaney City Administration/Council 763-593-3991 /763-593-8109(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting October 7, 2014 Agenda Item 3. C. 1. Solicitor's License- Garbage Man Prepared By Judy Nally, Administrative Assistant Summary As per City Code, any individual or group intending to go door-to-door within the City selling products, taking orders or soliciting for business or donations must be licensed by the City to do SO. Attachments • Peddler/Solicitor License Application (2 pages) Recommended Action Motion to approve the solicitor's license for Garbage Man. Application and fee must be submitted to the City Manager's Office the Wednesday prior to the City Council Meeting. Council Meetings are normally held the first and third Tuesday of each month. PEDDLER/SOLICITOR LICENSE APPLICATION TO: Golden Valley City Council Fee Paid: $ .30,to 7800 Golden Valley Road Number of Persons: Golden Valley, MN 55427 Type of License: Peddler o ici or (circle one) Enclose the sum of$_30 06 for (number) peddlers/solicitors as required by City Code of the City of Golden Valley and have complied with all the requirements of said Code necessary for obtaining this license. VY) CCe_Q_ yn (Business or Individual Name or Organization to be Licensed) MN Business ID Federal Business ID (FEIN) Define Business C'Cz C,%M� , on (Corporation, Proprietorship, Partnership, Non-Profit, State of Incorporation or Individual) �Mctl� `D,!:0gSAE K IN (Address) Pti In OL +k N\ �J ' 5` q Ll l City, State and Zip Code) 762 a�� ` aLl 7 (Telephone Number, including Area Code) NOW, THEREFORE, M i Q1�o,1 4erLo , hereby makes application for (Applicant Name) period of through 12/31/ , subject to the conditions and provisions of said City Code. _ ( ignature of Appli nt/Principal Officer) Description of goods or services for sale (include prices) or indicate if soliciting donations. If more space is needed, attach additional sheets (be specific): NOTE: If the products for sale are changed or modified, you must give the City complete information regarding such change or modification. List the names and addresses of EACH person who will be peddling or soliciting on behalf of said organization in the City, or, in the alternative, the name, address and telephone number or numbers where a responsible person of said organization will maintain a list of names and addresses of all persons engaged in peddling or soliciting in the City: JqC" A Mn4"' 116 -2177 17 (If more space is needed, attach additional sheets) STATE OF WcSa77 - ) ss. COUNTY OF I4�-,kfLVIN ) (Officer/Individual) (Name of Organization) being first duly sworn, depose and say that all the foregoing information is true to his/her own knowledge except as to matters therein stated on information and belief, and as to such matters, he/she believes them to be true. �i�ganatureApplicantfPrin6cipal Officer) Subscribed and sworn to before me this j 2/`day of ��'� V3��OC'✓ 20 I `7 (signature) jWN0C'W1' DITH� P+, '$ALLYWTAry Lj " Wti.31,2U15 city 0 MEMORANDUM got a en v11 11 valley City Administration/Council - 763-593-3991 /763 593-8109(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting October 7, 2014 Agenda Item 3. C. 2. Solicitor's License- Budget Exteriors, Inc. Prepared By Judy Nally, Administrative Assistant Summary As per City Code, any individual or group intending to go door-to-door within the City selling products, taking orders or soliciting for business or donations must be licensed by the City to do SO. Attachments • Peddler/Solicitor License Application (2 pages) Recommended Action Motion to approve the solicitor's license for Budget Exteriors, Inc.. Application and fee must be submitted to the City Manager's Office the Wednesday prior to the City Council Meeting. Council Meetings are normally held the first and third Tuesday of each month. PEDDLER/SOLICITOR LICENSE APPLICATION TO: Golden Valley City Council Fee Paid: $ 50.00 7800 Golden Valley Road Number of Persons: _ Golden Valley, MN 55427 Type of License: Peddler olicitor (circle on Enclose the sum of$ 50.00 for (number) peddlers/solicitors as required by City Code of the City of Golden Valley and have complied with all the requirements of said Code necessary for obtaining this license. Budget Exteriors, Inc. (Business or Individual Name or Organization to be Licensed) 1605418 41-1715912 MN Business ID Federal Business ID (FEIN) Define Business Minnesota Corporation (Corporation, Proprietorship, Partnership, Non-Profit, State of Incorporation or Individual) — BudgetE9811'I01'S,Inc. (Ac 8017 Nicollet Ave.S Bloomington,MN 55420 _ 952-887-1613 Fax 952-887-1659 Clt Lic.#BC006564 Exp.Date 3/31/16 (Telephone Number, including Area Code) NOW, THEREFORE,Kraig Burton,canvas Mgr/Budget Exteriors hereby makes application for (Applicant Name) period of Sept,2014through 12/31/ 14, subject to the conditions and provisions of said City Code. (Si ture o)fp ant/Principal Officer) Description of goods or services for sale (include prices) or indicate if soliciting donations. If more space is needed, attach additional sheets (be specific): Setting appts. for our sales force to give free estimates to homeowners for our home improvement and energy efficiency products, I.E. , Windows, insulation, siding, etc. NOTE: If the products for sale are changed or modified, you must give the City complete information regarding such change or modification. List the names and addresses of EACH person who will be peddling or soliciting on behalf of said organization in the City, or, in the alternative, the name, address and telephone number or numbers where a responsible person of said organization will maintain a list of names and addresses of all persons engaged in peddling or soliciting in the City: Budget Exteriors, Inc.- Kraig'bur4 )j)Canvassing Dept. Mgr. 8071 Nicollet Av. S.,Blmngtn,MN 55420 5200 W 102nd St.,Blmngtn,MN 55437 Donald Brown 3401 Colfax Av S, Mpls,MN 55408 Stephanie McCullough 1220 Oxford St, Hopkins,MN 55343 Richard Anderson 147 Birnamwood, Burnsville,MN 55337 Gerard of a b9UU 18th Av 5, Richtield,IVIN T+ ( �,arn!1 $�l t 7 �e en �v. , tyt�rrw �M IV 26 (If more space is needed, attach additional sheets) STATE OF MN ) ) ss. COUNTY OF Hennepin ) I Kraig Burton of Budget Exteriors, Inc. (Officer/Individual) (Name of Organization) being first duly sworn, depose and say that all the foregoing information is true to his/her own knowledge except as to matters therein stated on information and belief, and as to such matters, he/she believes them to be true. Sig ture of p icant/Principal Officer) Subscribed and sworn to before me this �h Pq day of 20 1+ (Signature) assafl ra ever Notary Public - Minnesota My Commt:s Expires January 31,2016 Regular Meeting of the Golden Valley Planning Commission August 25, 2014 A regular meeting of the Planning Commission was held at the Golden Valley City Hall, Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota, on Monday, August 25, 2014. Chair Kluchka called the meeting to order at 7 pm. Those present were Planning Commissioners Blum, Kluchka, Segelbaum and Waldhauser. Also present was Planning Manager Jason Zimmerman and Administrative Assistant Lisa Wittman. Commissioners Baker and Cera were absent. 1. Approval of Minutes July 14, 2014, Regular Planning Commission Meeting July 28, 2014, Regular Planning Commission Meeting Segelbaum referred to page 11 of the July 14 minutes and asked if it was him, or someone else, who questioned how the Golden Valley Senior Living proposal would affect Schuller's. He asked that it be clarified that a neighbor asked that question during the public hearing. Segelbaum referred to page 14 of the July 14 minutes and noted that his first name, rather than his last, was used in the third paragraph. MOVED by Segelbaum, seconded by Waldhauser and motion carried unanimously to approve the July 14, 2014, and the July 28, 2014, minutes with the above noted corrections. 2. Informal Public Hearing — Minor Subdivision Amendment— 221 Sunnyridge Lane— Kate's Woods — SU08-11 Applicant: David Knaeble Address: 221 Sunnyridge Lane Purpose: To revise the interior lot line of the recently approved Preliminary Plat. Zimmerman stated that the Preliminary Plat for the subdivision of 221 Sunnyridge Lane was approved by the City Council on July 15. At that same meeting, the lot width definition was amended, and is now in effect so the applicant is proposing a revision to the interior lot line to improve the shape of both of the lots. He explained that the applicant is proposing to call the interior lot line a side yard property line instead of a rear yard property line, and that staff would like the Planning Commission to interpret the language in the Zoning Code to help determine if it should be considered a side or rear lot line. He referred to a site plan of the property and noted that that there is a deck on the existing house that must be removed or modified in order to conform to the Zoning Code requirements. He stated that if the lot line is determined to be a rear lot line, staff recommends denial of the revision as the proposed subdivision would be in conflict with the requirements of the zoning district. If the lot line is Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission August 25, 2014 Page 2 determined to be a side lot line, staff recommends approval subject to the conditions recommended by Planning and Engineering. Waldhauser asked how the lot depth is calculated since that is what is used to determine the rear setback. Zimmerman stated that the rear yard setback requirement is 20% of the average lot depth. Kluchka asked why the interpretation issue couldn't be addressed during the final platting process. Zimmerman stated that the City Attorney thought that the proposed change was significant enough, and the Zoning Code is ambiguous enough, that it should be brought back to the Planning Commission for review. Kluchka questioned if the plan could be modified slightly to not be so extreme with either the side yard setback or rear yard setback location. Peter Knaeble, Applicant, handed out additional plans and stated that his intent is to rebuild or modify the existing deck to keep it out of the setback areas. He stated that the approved preliminary plat has really crooked property lines, and he clearly heard from the Planning Commission and the City Council that they would like that line to be straightened out. He stated that the only practical way to do this subdivision without a variance is to call the interior lot line a side yard property line, rather than a rear yard property line. He added that calling that property line a side yard property line will also allow the existing home to remain, which is a goal of the City Council. He showed examples of similar subdivisions, and discussed the side yard property lines, and rear yard property lines in those examples. He stated that when he first started considering this proposal he was told that there could be a variable rear yard setback line. He added that on issues of ordinance ambiguity, the common court precedent is to interpret it to the advantage of the landowner. Kluchka opened the public hearing. Seeing and hearing no one wishing to comment, Kluchka closed the public hearing. Blum referred to the site plan and note that the property line in question seems to bend at the back corner of the house, so the other properties the applicant referred to are a bit different than the subject property. Waldhauser stated that if the lot had been split without the existing house on it, the interior lot line would have been considered to be a side yard lot line, so it doesn't seem logical to call it a rear yard lot line at this point. She said this new proposal is an improvement over the other options, and is preserving the existing house. She said she thinks the Planning Commission would mostly be in favor of straightening out the lot line. Segelbaum said the property line in questions looks like a rear lot line. He agreed that if the house were not there, it would be a different story, but he thinks the intent of the Code is to have unbuilt property in back of the house. He said he also agreed that the Planning Commission wanted the lot to not be such an odd shape, but he wishes there were another way to draw the property line without necessitating a variance. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission August 25, 2014 Page 3 Kluchka questioned if it is fair to say that the Planning Commission asked that the property line be straightened, when they didn't know about the rear yard versus side yard issue. Waldhauser stated that the lot line could be re-drawn and there would not be a backyard on Lot 1 at all. Segelbaum said he is concerned about setting a precedent in how the Planning Commission interprets this issue, and how future proposals would use it going forward. Kluchka said he is not in agreement with calling the interior lot line a rear yard property line. Blum agreed, and reiterated that this proposal is not like the pie shaped examples they were shown, because they clearly start as two parallel side lot lines. MOVED by Segelbaum, seconded by Blum and motion carried 3 to 1 to recommend denial of the preliminary plat amendment. Commissioner Waldhauser voted no. 3. Informal Public Hearing — Conditional Use Permit—601 Boone Avenue North —TruStone Financial — CU-137 Applicant: TruStone Financial Address: 601 Boone Avenue North Purpose: To allow the applicant to operate a new credit union with three drive- thru lanes in the Commercial zoning district. Zimmerman stated that the applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) in order to operate a new credit union with three drive-thru lanes. He noted that a CUP was approved for this location in 2008, but the project was not constructed, so a new CUP is now required. He referred to a site plan and explained the applicants request to construct a one-story building with three drive-thru lanes located on the southeast corner of the building. He stated that 19 parking spaces are required, and the applicant is proposing 31 spaces. He added that based on the review of the application, and the evaluation of the factors listed in the Zoning Code, staff is recommending approval of the proposed CUP. Kluchka asked if there are any material differences between this proposal and the proposal approved in 2008. Zimmerman stated that the building is slightly smaller in this proposal. Waldhauser asked if conditions could be added regarding landscaping and drainage. Zimmerman stated that Conditional Use Permits really only consider the land use. Waldhauser noted that there seems to be a lot of signage proposed. Zimmerman stated that they will be required to follow the City's sign code requirements. Kluchka asked about snow storage on the site. Zimmerman suggested the applicant address that issue, but he assumes snow would be stored on the south side of the site. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission August 25, 2014 Page 4 Segelbaum noted that the first finding is the demonstrated need for the proposed use. He asked if that is pertaining only to the drive-thru windows, or the entire use. Zimmerman said it pertains to the entire use. Sean Raboin, HTG Architects, stated that the proposed new building will be slightly smaller than the one proposed in 2008. He stated that this should be a good fit, and a nice use for this property. He referred to the question regarding snow storage and stated that snow will be stored on the north part of the site, or it will be hauled off-site. Waldhauser asked if the applicant feels that they need as much parking as they are proposing. Raboin said yes, and added that this will be a very busy location. Segelbaum asked why they need to have three drive-thru lanes. Raboin stated that 10 years ago four or five drive-thru lanes was typical, but now banks like to have two drive- up windows and one drive-up ATM. Blum asked how the parking at this property compares with the parking at their current location. Raboin stated that they have more parking at their current facility, but it is a much larger building. Segelbaum asked if the applicant will continue to use their existing facility. Raboin said no. Kluchka asked if the timing of this project is related to the Douglas Drive reconstruction project. Raboin said he didn't know, but he thinks the economy has played a part as well. Kluchka opened the public hearing. Steve Schmidgall, 6534 Olympia Street, said he hopes there will be very little EIFS used and if so, not at grade, so it will continue to look good. Seeing and hearing no one else wishing to comment, Kluchka closed the public hearing. Kluchka said he knows this will be a busy location. He suggested that the applicant bring elevations and a material list to the City Council meeting. Segelbaum stated that more drive-thru lanes would also mean fewer cars stacking. Waldhauser said the proposal looks reasonable. She said she hopes some landscaping could be done along Highway 55, and that run-off from the parking lot could be captured in rain gardens, or some other system. MOVED by Blum, seconded by Waldhauser and motion carried unanimously to recommend approval of the Conditional Use Permit at 601 Boone Avenue North to allow a credit union with three drive-thru lanes in the Commercial zoning district subject to the following findings and conditions: Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission August 25, 2014 Page 5 Findings: 1. TruStone will be relocating from their current location at 6500 Olson Memorial Highway and will likely maintain if not grow their existing base of customers. 2. A financial institution is consistent with the Commercial designation of this property on the General Land Use Plan Map. 3. Staff anticipates the newly constructed building would not have a negative impact on the surrounding properties. In fact, the addition of a quality building to the vacant site is anticipated to have a positive effect. 4. As part of the original submission in 2008, a traffic study was done for this use and anticipated no concerns. Since this proposal is a slightly scaled back version of the original plan, Staff does not expect any negative traffic impacts to the surrounding areas. 5. The proposed use would generate a minor increase in the number of employees at the location. 6. The proposed use is not anticipated to cause an increase in noise levels. 7. There would be some pollution caused by the idling of vehicles waiting to be served in the drive-thru lanes. Due to the surrounding land uses and the proximity to Highway 55, this increase would not be significant. 8. The proposed use is not anticipated to attract pests. 9. Based on the site plans submitted and the architectural design of other TruStone Financial buildings that will be used as models for this structure, the visual quality of the property will be enhanced. 10.Staff does not anticipate any other negative effects of the proposed use. The location is a commercial area with good access that can handle any additional traffic. Conditions: 1. The plans by HTG Architects submitted on July 10, 2014, shall become a part of this approval. 2. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from Fire Chief John Crelly to Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager, dated August 18, 2014, shall become part of this approval. 3. A bicycle rack shall be added to the property providing for a minimum of four spaces. 4. All signage must meet the requirements of the City's Sign Code (Section 4.20). 5. This approval is subject to all other state, federal, and local ordinances, regulations, or laws with authority over this development. 4. Informal Public Hearing — Final Plan Review— Planned Unit Development (PUD) — Carousel Automobiles (Porsche Dealership) PUD #95, Amendment#3 Applicant: Twin Cities Automotive (Porsche) Address: 9191 and 9393 Wayzata Blvd, Purpose: To construct a new Porsche facility on the west side of the property. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission August 25, 2014 Page 6 Zimmerman stated that the Preliminary PUD plan for this proposal was approved by the City Council in July, and the applicant is now starting the Final PUD approval process. He referred to a site plan and explained the applicant's request to modify the existing parking area and to construct a new Porsche of Minneapolis building located to the west of the existing Audi building. He stated that since the Preliminary Plan stage the applicant has made slight modifications to the parking lot layout and the number of parking spaces. They've also made adjustments to the outdoor lighting levels. He discussed the design of the building and stated that it meets the setback requirements of the underlying Commercial zoning district, and there will be no change in the amount of impervious surface because the new building will replace an existing paved area. Zimmerman discussed parking on the site. He stated that the current number of parking spaces on the site is 633 spaces. The applicant is proposing to reduce the number of parking spaces to 557 which is a reduction of 76 spaces overall. The Preliminary PUD plan reduced the parking by 64 spaces. He stated that the applicant is also proposing 37 parking spaces that would encroach approximately five feet into the front yard setback, and approximately 34 display spaces that would fall entirely within the 35 foot front yard setback area along Wayzata Boulevard. Waldhauser questioned if condition #5 in Zimmerman's staff report regarding the relocation of the parking spaces along the south portion of the lot near the proposed building, should be removed. Zimmerman said yes, condition #5 from his memo should be removed. Waldhauser asked if the triangular shaped, landscaped island shown on the plans is new. Nguyen Hoang, Baker Associates, 150 South Fifth Street, Architect for the project, said that landscape island is not new and was shown on the preliminary plans. Kluchka asked about snow storage. Wayne Pisinski, Twin Cities Automotive, Applicant, stated that they might melt the snow on-site. Blum asked what they did to address the lighting on the site. Pisinski said they switched to LED lighting. Hoang added that the raised the light poles as well to provide more even lighting. Kluchka opened the public hearing. Seeing and hearing no one wishing to comment, Kluchka closed the public hearing. MOVED by Waldhauser, seconded by Segelbaum and motion carried unanimously to recommend approval of the Final PUD Plan for PUD #95, Amendment #3, Carousel Automobiles subject to the following findings and conditions: Findin s: 1. The PUD plan is tailored to the specific characteristics of the site and achieves a higher quality of site planning and design than generally expected under conventional provisions of the ordinance. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission August 25, 2014 Page 7 2. The PUD plan preserves and protects substantial desirable portions of the site's characteristics, open space and sensitive environmental features including steep slopes, trees, scenic views, creeks, wetlands, and open waters. 3. The PUD plan includes efficient and effective use (which includes preservation) of the land. 4. The PUD Plan results in development compatible with adjacent uses and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and redevelopment plans and goals. 5. The PUD plan is consistent with preserving and improving the general health, safety and general welfare of the people of the City. 6. The PUD plan meets the PUD Intent and Purpose provision and all other PUD ordinance provisions. Conditions: 1. The plans prepared by Baker Associates and submitted with the application on July 10, 2014, shall become a part of this approval. 2. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Fire Department to Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager, dated August 18, 2014, shall become a part of this approval. 3. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Engineering Division to Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager, dated August 18, 2014, shall become a part of this approval. 4. Parking in the lot south of Wayzata Boulevard shall be limited to inventory vehicles. Employee parking in this area will not be permitted. 5. All signage must meet the requirements of the City's Sign Code (Section 4.20). 6. This approval is subject to all other state, federal, and local ordinances, regulations, or laws with authority over this development. S. Informal Public Hearing — Preliminary Plan Review — Planned Unit Development (PUD) — Golden Villas — PUD #118 Applicant: Golden Villas, LLC Address: 9130 & 9220 Olson Memorial Highway Purpose: To construct a seven-story, 162-unit apartment building. Zimmerman stated that the applicant is proposing to develop a seven-story, 162 unit, market rate apartment building on the 2.57 acre site. He stated that the applicant is also seeking TIF assistance to help make the project financially feasible. He noted that 9130 Olson Memorial Highway contains a small, one-story office building, and 9220 Olson Memorial Highway contains the vacant bowling alley. Zimmerman referred to a site plan and explained that the proposed new building will be centrally located on the site. He stated that there will be two access points on Golden Valley Road, and a sidewalk will be constructed along Golden Valley Road. He referred to the parking on the site, and noted that the majority of the parking will be underground or Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission August 25, 2014 Page 8 enclosed on the ground floor level. There will be surface parking on three sides of the building and a 20-foot wide fire drive aisle along the rear of the building. He discussed some of the features and amenities including, eight units with individual entrances, secure bicycle parking/storage, a pool, and terrace among others. Zimmerman noted that staff is recommending approval of the Preliminary PUD plan subject to the Engineering and Fire Department comments including: the relocation of parking out of the right-of-way, additional work on the stormwater system, the number and location of fire hydrants, and radio operability for emergency responders within the building. Kluchka asked if the applicant would be installing the sidewalk along Golden Valley Road. Zimmerman said yes. Kluchka asked if parking is allowed on Golden Valley Road. Zimmerman said he wasn't sure, but that he would find out. Segelbaum asked for clarification on the number of stories. Zimmerman stated that there are six stories above ground, and one underground. Segelbaum noted that the nearby JHAP property has TIF financing and asked if that will impact this proposal. Zimmerman said the properties are viewed independently. Segelbaum referred to the number of parking spaces and the amount of impervious surface and asked if it seems reasonable to allow less parking, but more impervious surface. Zimmerman stated that if there are ways to redesign the 20-foot wide fire lane, there will be more options to explore ways to reduce the amount of impervious surface. Bill Stoddard, Applicant, stated that the former Tiburon project proposed for this site was six levels. He decided to have one level of underground parking which made it possible to reduce the height. He noted that on the street side of the building he is proposing some direct access units. He discussed other senior living facilities that he had developed in Florida and discussed several of the amenities he plans for this project including a day spa, "car to go" options, and conservation measures including roof top solar and water conservation efforts. He said he loves this gateway location, but he can't do the project without TIF. He referred to a site plan and stated that the structural coverage on the site will be 42.7% which includes the building, parking areas, and the fire lane. Waldhauser asked Stoddard if he has done other project in this area, and who will be managing this project once it is built. Stoddard said he has done some developments in Minnetonka and in a few other locations. He said he will be interviewing management companies to manage the property. Segelbaum asked Stoddard if he will continue to own the property after the building is constructed, or if he plans to sell it. Stoddard said it is his intent to keep the property for a long time. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission August 25, 2014 Page 9 Segelbaum asked Stoddard if he thinks the proposed 223 parking will be adequate. Stoddard said he believes that amount of parking will be adequate. He added that he can add more parking spaces on the site if needed. He is also proposing bicycle and moped spaces and he wants to really push the "car to go" option. Blum asked if the moped spaces count in the overall number of parking spaces. Stoddard said no, and added that he is proposing 20 outdoor scooter spaces. Zimmerman agreed that the scooter spaces are viewed differently than regular parking spaces. Segelbaum asked Stoddard about the timeline of this project. Stoddard said this project will take approximately 13 months to construct, and he hopes to break ground next summer. Kluchka said he is interested in a sidewalk connection to let pedestrians know they are welcome to walk on the property, not just past it. He added that he would also like to see a high level of design and quality in this gateway location. Stoddard said he typically uses 1/3 brick, 1/3 panels and 1/3 Hardie board siding, or something similar, to break up the look. Kluchka opened the public hearing. Kris Soder, Brookview Condominiums, said she is concerned about the traffic impacts from this proposal. Naomi Gardner, Brookview Condominiums, asked if this entire project consists of rental units. Kluchka said yes. Seeing and hearing no one else wishing to comment, Kluchka closed the public hearing. Kluchka asked about the traffic issues. Zimmerman stated that a traffic study was done for the previously approved Tiburon project, and that this proposal is not much different. However, staff will continue to work with the applicant on ways to improve any traffic issues. Segelbaum asked about the status of the Highway 55 exit ramp. Zimmerman stated that the slip ramp reconstruction was part of the Tiburon proposal, but it is not part of this proposal. Segelbaum said he thought the ramp project was part of the TIF district proposal. Zimmerman stated that there is a redevelopment area that includes several parcels, but each project is different. Kluchka said he would like to see some intersection improvements, and he wants to see what the additional traffic will do to the wait times, not just the capacity issues. Zimmerman stated that the HRA will be reviewing this proposal. He added that one concern staff has is that MnDOT could close the slip ramp. He said the City does not want all the traffic to have to go to Boone Avenue. Segelbaum asked if there will be a neighborhood meeting held. Zimmerman said yes, the PUD process requires that a neighborhood meeting be held. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission August 25, 2014 Page 10 Kluchka suggested a condition be added regarding the review of design and materials. Segelbaum said he would like to add that language stating that review should also occur on the items not shown in the current plans in order to preserve the City's rights. Waldhauser agreed that it is difficult to tell at this point if the applicant and Planning Commission are aiming toward the same goals. MOVED by Segelbaum, seconded by Waldhauser and motion carried unanimously to recommend approval of the Preliminary PUD Plan for PUD #118, Golden Villas subject to the following findings and conditions: Findings: 1. The PUD plan is tailored to the specific characteristics of the site and achieves a higher quality of site planning and design than generally expected under conventional provisions of the ordinance. 2. The PUD plan preserves and protects substantial desirable portions of the site's characteristics, open space and sensitive environmental features including steep slopes, trees, scenic views, creeks, wetlands, and open waters. 3. The PUD plan includes efficient and effective use (which includes preservation) of the land. 4. The PUD Plan results in development compatible with adjacent uses and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and redevelopment plans and goals. 5. The PUD plan is consistent with preserving and improving the general health, safety and general welfare of the people of the City. 6. The PUD plan meets the PUD Intent and Purpose provision and all other PUD ordinance provisions. Conditions: 1. The plans prepared by Gronberg & Associates, Inc., submitted with the application on July 25 and August 11, 2014, shall become a part of this approval. 2. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Engineering Division to Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager, dated August 18, 2014, shall become a part of this approval. 3. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Fire Department to Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager, dated August 18, 2014, shall become a part of this approval. 4. The final design of materials and landscaping shall be reviewed and approved by the City prior to Final Plan approval. 5. All signage must meet the requirements of the City's Sign Code (Section 4.20). 6. A park dedication fee of$31,680 (2% of the estimated land value) shall be paid prior to approval of the Final Plat. 7. The Final Plat shall include "P.U.D. No. 118" in its title. 8. This approval is subject to all other state, federal, and local ordinances, regulations, or laws with authority over this development. --Short Recess— Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission August 25, 2014 Page 11 6. Reports on Meetings of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority, City Council, Board of Zoning Appeals and other Meetings Kluchka gave an update on the most recent Community Center Task Force meeting where developing the current driving range and removing the 9-hole area were discussed. 7. Other Business • Update Regarding Council/Manager Meeting Zimmerman gave an update on the August 21 Council/Manager meeting. He stated that the Council agreed with the Planning Commission's recommendations regarding recycling centers, so he will start working on ordinance language and bring it back to the Planning Commission for review. Zimmerman stated that at the same meeting the Council discussed putting a moratorium on all Single Family R-1 subdivision proposals in order to allow them time to discuss large lot requirements, aesthetics, and the community feeling regarding subdivisions. • Council Liaison Report No report was given. 8. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 9:15 pm. Charles D. Segelbaum, Secretary Lisa Wittman, Administrative Assistant Minutes of a Regular Meeting of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals August 26, 2014 A regular meeting of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals was held on Tuesday, August 26, 2014, at City Hall, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. Chair Johnson called the meeting to order at 7 pm. Those present were Members Johnson, Maxwell, Nelson, Perich and Planning Commission Representative Blum. Also present were Planning Manager Jason Zimmerman, and Administrative Assistant Lisa Wittman. I. Approval of Minutes — July 22, 2014 Regular Meeting MOVED by Nelson, seconded by Perich and motion carried unanimously to approve the July 22, 2014, minutes as submitted. II. The Petition(s) are: 116 Ottawa Avenue South Saw-Mehone Tebedge, Applicant Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Single Family Zoning District, Subd. 12(A)(3) Accessory Structure Side Yard Setback Requirements • 2 ft. off of the required 5 ft. to a distance of 3 ft. at its closest point to the side yard (south) property line. Purpose: To allow for the construction of a detached garage. Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Single Family Zoning District, Subd. 12(A)(3) Accessory Structure Side Yard Setback Requirements • 5 ft. off of the required 5 ft. to a distance of 0 ft. at its closest point to the rear yard (southwest) property line. Purpose: To allow for the construction of a detached garage. Zimmerman referred to a survey of the property and explained the applicant's proposal to construct a new detached garage in the south corner of the property. The proposed garage would be 525 square feet in size and would be located 3 ft. from the side yard property line and 0 ft. from the rear yard property line. He stated that the total amount of accessory structure space on this property would be 999 square feet and that the Single Family R-1 Zoning District allows 1,000 square feet of accessory structure space. Minutes of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals August 26, 2014 Page 2 Johnson said he understands that the applicant has told staff he would like to revise his plans. Zimmerman said yes, and stated that the applicant would now like to propose a garage addition to the front of his existing attached garage, similar to the next item on the agenda. Johnson asked the applicant if he is still interested in pursuing the variances he has requested. Saw-Mehone Tebedge, Applicant, said he would like to pursue the variances as he requested them, only if his other option is not acceptable. He reiterated that he would like to do the exact same garage addition that is being proposed in the next item on the agenda. Zimmerman suggested the Board change the order of the agenda and discuss the next item before this request. The Board agreed to come back to this item. 1411 Tyrol Trail Carolyn Berman, Applicant Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Single Family Zoning District, Subd. 11(A)(3)(b) Side Yard Setback Requirements • 6.45 ft. off of the required 12.5 ft. to a distance of 6.05 ft. at its closest point to the side yard (east) property line. Purpose: To allow for the construction of a garage addition. Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Single Family Zoning District, Subd. 11(A)(1) Front Yard Setback Requirements • 18.8 ft. off of the required 35 ft. to a distance of 16.2 ft. at its closest point to the front yard (south) property line. Purpose: To allow for the construction of a garage addition. Zimmerman referred to a site plan of the property and explained the applicant's request to construct a garage addition with deck space above. He stated that the applicant currently has a small, one-stall tuck-under garage and that the proposed new garage would be 6.05 ft. from the side yard property line, and 16.2 ft. from the front yard property line. Perich asked if the applicant is proposing to build on top of the proposed 8 ft. extension toward the front. Zimmerman said yes. Blum asked Zimmerman if he has heard from the next door neighbor regarding this proposal. Carolyn Berman, Applicant, handed out letters of support from four of her neighbors. She stated that the existing garage is original to the home which was built in 1939. She said there really isn't anywhere else to expand on this property. She stated that in this neighborhood there isn't a strong, definite visual line where the houses line up with each other, so what she is proposing will have less of an impact, and will fit with the Minutes of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals August 26, 2014 Page 3 character of the neighborhood. She stated that the original house is 23 ft. from the front property line and because of the proposed projection of the garage addition, the before and after will look very similar. Nelson asked Berman if she had considered other options. Berman stated that with the way the house is situated on this corner lot, what she is proposing is really her only choice. Maxwell stated that the unique features of this property are the size, the fact that it is a corner lot, and that there is currently only one garage stall. He asked if there are any other unique features. Nelson added that the existing home is already located in the front setback area. Johnson opened the public hearing. Jim Ladner, 1414 Tyrol Trail South, stated that the street curves quite a bit, and the houses are not in one continuous line, but are staggered. He stated that two-stall garages are common and that this is one of the only homes in the area without a two-stall garage. He said it would be great to see the cars go in the garage, rather than on the driveway. He added that there are other garages in the area located much closer to the property lines than what the applicant is proposing, so what is being proposed will be consistent with other properties. He urged the Board to grant the requested variances. Seeing and hearing no one else wishing to comment, Johnson closed the public hearing. Berman referred to a plan of the proposed garage addition and stated that one of the reasons for coming forward with the addition is that she needs to be able to walk in front of a car in order to get into the door, and there will need to be room to maneuver. Nelson asked about the City's regulations regarding cars parked outside of a garage. Zimmerman stated that there is no limit to the number of cars a person can have, but that they are required to be parked on a paved surface. Nelson stated that the Board tries to allow for two-stall garages when possible. She said the issues in this case are being caused by the fact that this is a corner lot. She said she would be in favor of granting the requested variances because it is in harmony with the intent of the City's ordinances, it is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the neighbors are in favor of it. She added that the unique circumstance in this case is where the house was originally placed on the lot. Perich agreed that the proposal is reasonable. Johnson questioned what the dimensions of the portion above the proposed garage would be if it were built as living space, rather than deck space. Berman said she would not build living space above the entire proposed garage space because it would block the bedroom windows. Maxwell noted that if the space above the garage was entirely living space, the increased setback and articulation requirements would probably apply and additional variances would be needed. Minutes of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals August 26, 2014 Page 4 Blum stated that the City hears a lot about maintaining the character of a neighborhood, and is it pretty clear that most homes have a two-stall garage. He added that the property would be more conforming with a two-stall garage. MOVED by Maxwell, seconded by Perich and motion carried unanimously to approve the following variances: • 6.45 ft. off of the required 12.5 ft. to a distance of 6.05 ft. at its closest point to the side yard (east) property line to allow for the construction of a garage addition. • 18.8 ft. off of the required 35 ft. to a distance of 16.2 ft. at its closest point to the front yard (south) property line to allow for the construction of a garage addition. The Board continued its discussion of the variance requests for 116 Ottawa Avenue South. Tebedge, Applicant, said the variances he is requesting would allow for a garage to be constructed in his back yard in order to store his collector cars, however, a garage in that location affects his property more than any other property in the neighborhood. He discussed the grade of his property and stated that his original plan was to extend the garage forward closer to the front yard property line, but that would require a larger variance. He stated that the house was built in 1946. It has four bedrooms and three bathrooms with only an 18 ft. x 21 ft. two-stall garage without much room for storage, and that for a house this big, the existing garage is not adequate. He noted that he could build a detached garage in other locations, but they don't make sense. Nelson asked how close the existing house is to the front property line. Tebedge said the house is 35 ft. from the front property line and that he would like to change his variance request in order to build an addition just like the previous proposal. Nelson asked Tebedge if he could build a garage in the back yard (northwest corner). Tebedge said yes, but then he would have a long driveway, and he might go over the amount of impervious surface he is allowed to have. Maxwell asked how often the "milestone" cars are taken out of the garage. Tebedge said they are not taken out at all. Maxwell noted that the applicant could build a garage without a driveway. Tebedge said he could also build a detached garage in the front yard, but that would look terrible, and it is not what he wants to do. He reiterated that he wants to add on to the front of his existing garage. Johnson asked Tebedge if he would like the Board to vote on the variance requests he submitted, or if he would like to pursue variances for a different proposal. Tebege stated that if he can't do the garage addition toward the front, then he would have to come back to the Board with his original request, but ultimately he would like to ask for the front yard variances. Minutes of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals August 26, 2014 Page 5 Maxwell suggested the Board discuss the proposal that the applicant really wants to pursue. Zimmerman noted that the Board can discuss the applicant's new proposal; however hearing notices mailed to the neighboring property owners were for the proposal as shown on the agenda with the garage in the back yard. Perich agreed that the Board should discuss the proposal that is before them. Nelson asked Tebege if he could store his cars in another location. Tebege stated that it costs a lot of money to store cars elsewhere. Nelson said the Board is sensitive about granting front yard variances. She added that two-stall garages are very typical in Golden Valley even with larger homes. Tebege stated that there are many houses in his neighborhood that have three-stall garages. Maxwell encouraged Tebege to think about any unique circumstances with his property in order to justify the variance requests. Johnson added that he doesn't want to imply that the Board will like another proposal better than this one. Maxwell suggested this item be tabled rather than withdrawn. MOVED by Maxwell, seconded by Perich and motion carried unanimously to table this proposal to the September Board of Zoning Appeals meeting. III. Other Business No other business was discussed. IV. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 8:10 pm. Andrew Johnson, Chair Lisa Wittman, Administrative Assistant MINUTES Human Rights Commission (HRC) City of Golden Valley 7800 Golden Valley Road Golden Valley, MN 55427 Council Conference Room May 27, 2014 Commissioners present: Adam Buttress, Chair Brian Cook, Vice-Chair Jonathan Burris Carla Johnson Teresa Martin Payton Perkins Susan Phelps Michael Pristash Commissioners absent: None Guest: Christopher Jordan Staff Liaison: Chantell Knauss Assistant City Manager The meeting was convened at 6:30 pm by Chair Buttress. Approval of April 22, 2014 Regular Meeting Minutes Motion by Vice-Chair Cook, second by Chair Buttress to approve the minutes. Motion carried 8-0. Introductions Commissioners, guests, and staff introduced themselves for the benefit of the three new Commissioners Martin, Phelps and Pristash. Former Commissioner Jordan was recognized for his service and valuable contributions to the Human Rights Commission. Review HRC Conversations May 8 Event There were 31 total attendees, including Council Members, HRC Commissioners, panelists and staff. This was the most well-attended HRC sponsored event to date. Commissioners discussed the results of the survey completed by attendees which all had favorable remarks about the event. One of the comments on the survey concerned Crisis Intervention Training (CIT) for police officers. Knauss read the email that was sent to the City Council Members from Police Chief Carlson, following the May 8 event which states: We have trained about 2/3 of our patrol officers in CIT. It is based on the nationally recognized Memphis PD program, which is the only model used in law enforcement. Human Rights Commission May 27,2014 Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 4 We have consistently sent 2-3 officers to the training each time we have seen it offered. We have consciously had a running goal of getting every patrol officer trained. The training is offered infrequently and is 40 hours, thus why we can only send a couple at a time. We will continue to send officers until everyone has had the basic course. There are also periodic refresher courses, which is our next goal. We also periodically bring in trainers to our in-service training to discuss various topics related to dealing with the mentally ill. Conversely, we are currently researching offering an evening at the PD for autistic kids, to acclimate them to police officers. This would hopefully help them reach out to an officer should they ever need help. There is not a model for this type of event but we figured with the rising numbers of autism, an attempt at familiarizing them to officers is a good start even if we are doing it off the cuff. HRC Conversations Event Planning — October 9 "Adults and Mental Illness" • C. Knauss reported that Ken Barlow, KSTP Meteorologist, has confirmed that he will be a speaker at the event. • Commissioner Burris is awaiting a return call from Touchstone to see if they would be able to provide a representative for the panel discussion. • Commissioner Martin to contact Hugh Elwood at Oasis to see if they would be able to provide a representative for the panel discussion. • Commissioner Martin to contact NAMI to see if they will be able to provide a representative for the panel discussion. • Chair Buttress to contact a Walk-in Counseling Center to see if they would be able to provide a representative for the panel discussion. • Vice-Chair Cook reported that Representative Jim Ramstad would likely not be available for the event. • Council Member Snope to contact Senator Al or Frannie Franken to see if one of them would be a speaker for the event (continued follow-up from April 22 meeting). Other ideas for the October 9 event that were discussed was including a representative from a Veterans organization on the panel to discuss discharged military personnel and mental illness; having City police staff on the panel to talk about the mental illness calls they are receiving. It was the Commissions consensus that Ken Barlow, Touchstone, Oasis, Walk-in Counseling, and NAMI representatives would be a well-rounded panel for this topic. The Commission also agreed to host the event in the City Hall Council Chambers from 6:30-8 pm. New Business — Election of Chair and Vice-Chair In accordance with the HRC Bylaws and Board/Commission Guidelines, a Chair and Vice- Chair are elected each May. The Chair and Vice-Chair serve one-year, non-consecutive terms. It is the City's interpretation that since Chair Buttress was completing the term vacated by Council Member Snope and only served four (4) months, he would be eligible to serve as Chair again. This would also be the case with Vice-Chair Cook since he was elected to serve the remaining four (4) months of former Vice-Chair Buttress' term when he filled the Chair vacancy. Human Rights Commission May 27,2014 Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 4 Motion by Commissioner Pristash, second by Commissioner Martin to nominate Chair Buttress and Vice-Chair Cook to serve again. Motion carried 5 — 2 — 1. Ayes: Commissioners Johnson, Martin, Perkins, Phelps, and Pristash; Nays: Chair Buttress, Commissioner Burris; Abstain: Vice-Chair Cook. Motion by Commissioner Burris, second by Chair Buttress to re-consider the previous vote. Motion carried 8 — 0. There was discussion as to whether or not any other commissioners are interested in serving as Chair or Vice-Chair. Motion by Commissioner Johnson, second by Chair Buttress to nominate Vice-Chair Cook as Chair. Motion carried 5 — 0 — 3. Ayes: Commissioners Buttress, Burris, Johnson, Martin, and Phelps; Abstain: Cook, Perkins, and Pristash. Motion by Commissioner Burris, second by Commissioner Johnson to nominate Commissioner Martin as Vice-Chair. Motion carried 7 — 0 — 1. Ayes: Commissioners Burris, Buttress, Cook, Johnson, Perkins, Phelps, and Pristash; Abstain: Martin. Open Meeting Law Knauss distributed to new Commissioners Martin, Phelps and Pristash the DVD recording of the Open Meeting Law Training that was presented to Golden Valley City Council and Board/Commission members by the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust on June 12, 2013. Commissioners were asked to view the DVD as part of their HRC responsibilities and they would also be receiving the HRC Bylaws and Council Guidelines for Boards/Commissions via email. Adjourn Motion by Chair Cook, second by Commissioner Pristash to adjourn the meeting at 7:39 pm. Motion carried 8 —0. Follow-up Items: • Commissioner Burris is awaiting a return call from TouchStone to see if they would be able to provide a representative for the panel discussion. • Commissioner Martin to contact Hugh Elwood at Oasis to see if they would be able to provide a representative for the panel discussion. • Commissioner Martin to contact NAMI to see if they will be able to provide a representative for the panel discussion. • Chair Buttress to contact a Walk-in Counseling Center to see if they would be able to provide a representative for the panel discussion. • Council Member Snope to contact Senator Al or Frannie Franken to see if one of them would be a speaker for the event (continued follow-up from April 22 meeting). Human Rights Commission May 27,2014 Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 4 Adam Buttress, Chair ATTEST: Chantell Knauss, Staff Liaison Approved by HRC:, 2014 Human Rights Commission May 27,2014 Meeting Minutes Page 4 of 4 JOINT WATER COMMISSION MINUTES Golden Valley - Crystal - New Hope Meeting of July 2, 2014 The Golden Valley— Crystal — New Hope Joint Water Commission meeting was called to order at 1:33 p.m. in the City of Golden Valley Council Conference Room. Commissioners Present Tom Burt, City Manager, Golden Valley Kirk McDonald, City Manager, New Hope Anne Norris, City Manager, Crystal Staff Present Randy Kloepper, Utilities Superintendent, Crystal Bernie Weber, Operations Manager, New Hope Sue Virnig, Finance Director, Golden Valley Jeff Oliver, City Engineer Bert Tracy, Public Works Maintenance Supervisor Kelley Janes, Utilities Supervisor, Golden Valley Mitch Hoeft, Utilities Engineer, Golden Valley Pat Schutrop, Administrative Assistant, Golden Valley Minutes of June 4, 2014 Meeting MOVED by McDonald and seconded by Norris to approve the minutes of the June 4, 2014 meeting as presented. Motion carried. 2013 Annual Financial Report The financial audit report for year-ending December 31, 2013 prepared by Montague, Karnowski, Radosevich & Laurer was presented with no findings. MOVED by McDonald and seconded by Norris to accept the 2013 Annual Financial Report. Motion carried. Resolution 14-01 Designating Depositories for Joint Water Funds Commissioner Norris introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION 14-01 RESOLUTION DESIGNATING DEPOSITORIES FOR JOINT WATER FUNDS The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Commissioner McDonald and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Burt, Norris and McDonald; and the following voted against the same: none; whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Chair and his signature attested by the Vice Chair. Joint Water Commission July 2,2014 Page 2 of 3 Resolution 14-02 Making Annual Elections for the 2014-2015 Insurance Policy Commissioner McDonald introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION 14-02 RESOLUTION MAKING ANNUAL ELECTIONS FOR THE 2014-2015 INSURANCE POLICY The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Commissioner Norris and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Burt, Norris and McDonald; and the following voted against the same: none; whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Chair and his signature attested by the Vice Chair. Resolution 14-03 Adopting the 2015-2019 Capital Projects for the Golden Valley- Crystal-New Hope Joint Water Commission Commissioner McDonald introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption to Schedule A: RESOLUTION 14-03 RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE 2015-2019 CAPITAL PROJECTS FOR THE GOLDEN VALLEY-CRYSTAL-NEW HOPE JOINT WATER COMMISSION The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution noted on Scheduled A was seconded by Commissioner Norris and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Burt, McDonald and Norris; and the following voted against the same: none; whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Chair and his signature attested by the Vice Chair. Resolution 14-04 Adopting the 2015 General Fund Budget of the Joint Water Commission Commissioner McDonald introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption of the 2015 budget total of$8,444,480: RESOLUTION 14-04 RESOLUTION OF THE JOINT WATER COMMISSION ADOPTING THE 2015 GENERAL FUND BUDGET The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Commissioner Norris and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Burt, Norris and McDonald; and the following voted against the same: none; whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Chair and his signature attested by the Vice Chair. Update on Emergency Backup Water Supply Proiect The advertisement for bids for the Emergency Wells Water Supply Line portion of the project has been published. The bid opening is planned for July 17 at the City of Golden Joint Water Commission July 2, 2014 Page 3 of 3 Valley. In order to keep the project on schedule, a special JWC meeting will need to be scheduled to award this portion of the project. JWC members will look at the week of July 21 to set the meeting. The chlorine feed and well startup portion of the project will be the final package to be advertised for bid. This bid will include the New Hope well improvements. Once this phase of the work is completed, all four wells will be operational. Mitch Hoeft talked to the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board (MPRB) last week for an update on the completion of the easement agreement process so that work on the Golden Valley well can begin. The MPRB is working with its legal department on finalizing the easement agreement. Update on County Road 9 Project The temporary bypass for the Crystal reservoir is fully operational. There may be a possibility that the contractor will extend the work up to France Avenue. If that happens, the bypass is in place to avoid any interruption of service. The contractor would have the portion of the work affecting the Crystal water distribution system completed by August or September 2014. Update on Crystal Pump Station Generator Project The generator has been loaded tested. Crystal is waiting on Xcel's schedule to shut down power to the site so that the generator can be connected to the building. That work is tentatively scheduled for the week of July 7. Other Business None. Next Meeting The next meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, August 6, 2014, at 1:30 p.m. Adiournment Chair Burt adjourned the meeting at 1:53 p.m. Thomas D. Burt, Chair ATTEST: Pat Schutrop, Recording Secretary GOLDEN VALLEY ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION Regular Meeting Minutes July 28, 2014 Present: Commissioners Jim Stremel, Tracy Anderson, Lynn Gitelis, Larry Johnson; Eric Eckman, Public Works Specialist; Deric Deuschle, SEH, Veronica Anderson, SEH and Lisa Nesbitt, Administrative Assistant Absent: Commissioners Dawn Hill, Tonia Galonska and Debra Yahle Call to Order Stremel called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. Approval of Regular Meeting Minutes —June 23, 2014 MOVED by Gitelis, seconded by Anderson, and the motion carried unanimously to approve the minutes of the June 23, 2014 meeting as amended to correct Commission Johnson's previous experience work experience. Natural Resource Management Plan Deric Deuschle and Veronica Anderson handed out an agenda which will serve as an outline for developing the Natural Resource Management Plan (NRMP). A copy of the agenda is on-file. The goal is to complete the plan by the end of the year. Sample vision and goal statements were presented and discussed. Gitelis requested that something be added to include the potential for dealing with invasive species. Deuschle suggested that adding the term "adaptive management" to the goal statement would be sufficient. Anderson felt that vision statement #2 might be the best if the word "enhance" is included. Additionally, the word "developed" needs to be included before urban spaces. Due to the absence of the other commissioners, a decision on the vision and goal statements will be completed at the August meeting. It was suggested that public feedback be solicited early on in the process. Eckman will work with the Communications Department about setting up a place on the city's website where feedback can be submitted; similar to how it was done for the chicken study. The commission would also like to have the public submit pictures for the plan. Possible submissions could come from some of the photos submitted to the City for the annual photo contest. New Proposals for Greener Practices The commission was given a list of green initiatives that the City has completed or are currently underway. Staff was asked to create a list of items, that the City is working on, that can be tracked each year and included with the annual report. A list of suggestions/ideas for greener practices, will be made by the commission, throughout the year and will be included in the annual report. The list of suggestions is a separate document. Minutes of the Environmental Commission July 28, 2014 Page 2 of 2 Program/Project Updates Summary on-file. Gitelis gave a community center update. At the last meeting, room configurations and uses were discussed. There will be two meetings in August, one will be on the same night as the commission meeting. Commission Member Council Reports None Other Business None Adiourn MOVED by Gitelis, seconded by Anderson, and the motion carried to adjourn. The meeting adjourned at 9:00 pm. Lisa Nesbitt Administrative Assistant Item 4A BCWMC 8-21-14 Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission inutesf Regular::Nle �>igjai ��G'i July 17 2U14 Golden Valley City Hall,8.30 a.m. Commissioners and Staff Present: Crystal Commissioner Guy Mueller,Vice Robbinsdale Not represented Chair Golden Valley Alternate Commissioner Jane St. Louis Park Commissioner Jim de Lambert,Chair McDonald Black Medicine Lake Commissioner Clint Carlson Administrator Not present Minneapolis Commissioner Michael Welch Attorney Charlie LeFevere,Kennedy&Graven Minnetonka Not represented Engineer Karen Chandler,Barr Engineering Co. New Hope Commissioner John Elder Recorder Amy Herbert Plymouth Commissioner Ginny Black Technical Advisory Committee(TAC)Members/Other Attendees Present: Derek Asche,TAC,City of Plymouth Linda Loomis, Chair,Plan Steering Cmtee Pat Crough,Alternate Commissioner, City of New Christy Lueck, Golden Valley Resident Hope Harvey Feldman Shawn Markham, City of New Hope Erick Francis,TAC,City of St. Louis Park Tom Mathisen,TAC, City of Crystal Christopher Gise,Golden Valley Resident Robert Mehlher Mary Gwin-Lenth,New Hope Resident Dick Moon,Golden Valley Resident Sharma Hanson, Golden Valley Resident Jeff Oliver,TAC, City of Golden Valley Shep Harris,Mayor,Golden Valley John O'Toole,Alternate Commissioner, City of Medicine Lake Kathi Hemken, Mayor,New Hope Charles `Chuck' Schmidt,New Hope Resident Gary Holter,Mayor, Medicine Lake Peter Tiede,Murnane Brandt Laura Leonhardt,New Hope Resident Dave Tobelmann,Alternate Commissioner,City of Plymouth Chris Long,TAC, City of New Hope Jeff Weber, Golden Valley Resident 1 BCWMC July 17, 2014, Meeting Minutes L CALL TQ ORDER AND ROLL CALL On Thursday,July 17,2014,at 8:34 a.m. in the Council Conference room at Golden Valley City Hall, Chair de Lambert called to order the meeting of the Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission(BCWMC)and asked for roll call to be taken. The Cities of Minnetonka and Robbinsdale were absent from the roll call. 2.'CITIZENI FORUM ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS New Hope resident Chuck Schmidt brought forward the status of the holding pond located at 36h Avenue North, west of the Twin Cities West Railroad line,and south of Winnetka Village. He reported that the pond is full of silt and sediment and that the outlet for the pond is 90%blocked with grass and logs. Mr. Schmidt noted that the design of the outlet is probably not designed for best function because there isn't anything in place to catch the debris.He requested a solution to the issues and suggested dredging the pond and to reduce sedimentation with rip-rap. TAC representative Tom Mathisen provided comments and said that the City of Crystal can take a look at the pond. Engineer Chandler asked if the pond is in-line with the North Branch of Bassett Creek. Mr.Mathisen said yes. Commissioner Welch recommended that the Commission add a discussion of in-line sedimentation issues to a future Commission meeting. There was discussion about referring the issue to the City and requesting that the City update the Commission Administrator on the status. Commissioner Mueller said that he agreed that having the Commission Administrator and City Engineer work to figure out the project scope and roles of the City and Commission in this case. Commissioner Welch said that he sees three categories of issues including: sediment when it is in the flow of the creek,other public facilities,and areas of sedimentation that are on private properties. Mr.Asche added that the Joint Powers Agreement allows for a lot of different ways to get such projects done and they don't need to be exclusively city projects or Commission projects.The Commission agreed to refer the issue to the City and to have the Commission Administrator and the City look at the issue and report back to the Commission. 3.AGENDA Chair de Lambert added to the Consent Agenda the ordering of a public hearing for the Commission's September 18 meeting and the direction to staff to notice the hearing. Commissioner Black moved to approve the agenda as amended. Commissioner McDonald Black seconded the motion.Upon a vote,the motion carried 7-0 [Cities of Minnetonka and Robbinsdale absent from vote]. 4.: NSENT AGENDA Commissioner Welch requested the removal of item 4D—Approval to request extension of Clean Water Fund grant for 2012 Main Stem Restoration Project. Chair de Lambert said that the item would be added to the agenda as 5E.Alternate Commissioner Jane McDonald Black moved to approve the Consent Agenda as amended. Commissioner Black seconded the motion. Upon a vote,the motion carried 7-0 [Cities of Minnetonka and Robbinsdale absent from vote]. [The following items were approved as part of the Consent Agenda:the June 19,2014, Commission Meeting minutes,the monthly financial report,and the payment of the invoices] 2 BCWMC July 17, 2014, Meeting Minutes The general and construction account balances reported in the Financial Report prepared for the July 17,2014, meeting are as follows: Checking Account Balance $685,393.47 TOTAL GENERAL FUND BALANCE $685,393.47 TOTAL CASH&INVESTMENTS ON- $3,068,173.65 HAND (7/8/14) CIP Projects Levied—Budget Remaining ($2,865,645.33) Closed Projects Remaining Balance ($202,528.32) 2013 Anticipated Tax Levy Revenue $8,756.59 2014 Anticipated Tax Levy Revenue $428,419.00 Anticipated Closed Project Balance $639,704.41 5.BUSINESS A. Status of Amendment to Joint Powers Agreement Chair de Lambert announced that eight of the nine cities have signed the Joint Powers Agreement Amendment.He reported that the ninth is the City of Minneapolis and from his understanding it is expected that the City of Minneapolis will sign it. Golden Valley Mayor Shep Harris welcomed everyone to Golden Valley City Hall and thanked them for coming to the meeting as well as for their time volunteering. He thanked the City of Medicine Lake for its hard work on this issue of the JPA amendment and thanked the other member cities' members and council people for their work. Mayor Harris summarized the discussions with the Medicine Lake city council at the Medicine Lake city council meeting and summarized the outcomes of the conversation. He reported that the cities of Plymouth and Medicine Lake are going to continue with discussions regarding a possible study of Medicine Lake water levels. Mayor Harris also stated that Golden Valley has now looked reflectively at the JPA amendment process and realized that its city council didn't stop to discuss issues that other BCWMC members were having.He thanked Medicine Lake Mayor Holter for bringing issues to Golden Valley's attention. Mayor Harris said that the Golden Valley city council will be conducting a work session with Mayor Holter in order to talk about the issues and interests of Medicine Lake,including recreation. Mayor Harris stated that he sees this as an opportunity to work better among cities and to hear and understand concerns of cities in the region. New Hope Mayor Kathi Hemken stated that when a mayor is frustrated and is saying that no one is listening, it either means that no one is listening or that the mayor isn't getting the answer the mayor wants. She said that when a mayor isn't getting the answers he or she wants then the member cities should step up as a group and find out how to help. Mayor Hemken said that as a group,this JPA organization can help Medicine Lake to 3 BCWMC July 17, 2014, Meeting Minutes understand either that this organization ca fix this problem or help them to go someplace else for information or help. Medicine Lake Mayor Holter thanked everyone for helping the City of Medicine Lake. Commissioner Welch expressed his appreciation that the BCWMC and its activities are now on the radar of more people and that those people recognize the vested interested in those activities. He raised the topic of the watershed's Next Generation Plan and said that the Commission has an ongoing planning process for the 10- year plan,which is the place to discuss activities and priorities of the Commission. He said the Commission can use all of the input it can get for the 10-year Plan,but he would be very anxious if separate dialogs are started about it outside of the planning process. Commissioner Welch also provided an update on the status of the City of Minneapolis' signing of the JPA amendment. Chair de Lambert summarized the Commission's Next Generation Plan and the process the Commission is currently undertaking with it. Alternate Commissioner O'Toole noted that the Commission is a cooperative association of member cities and if the member cities want to take the involvement up a level,then they can do so. He said that Plymouth, Golden Valley, and New Hope make up about 80%of the residents and property values in the watershed and if they want to step up their involvement in the leadership on issues affecting the watershed,then it is within their power to do so, and he thinks that the 10-year Plan should reflect the input on these issues. There were comments on the current 10-year plan and points raised about the need to be very specific with the definition of recreation in the 10-year plan. B. Consider Request from Golden Valley for Additional Sample Collections on Sweeney Lake for Blue Green Algae Engineer Chandler talked about the discovery of blue-green algae in Sweeney Lake and provided details on the water samples,the lab tests and results and their significance. She summarized that this algae does not always produce toxins,but sometimes does and so people should not be in contact with the water.Mr. Oliver detailed the City of Golden Valley's communications to residents about the algae. Engineer Chandler described the Commission's summer sampling schedule of Sweeney Lake.Mr. Oliver talked about the conversations that the City of Golden Valley has had with the Commission Engineer and Administrator regarding the collection of additional data on Sweeney Lake this summer. Commissioner Welch asked if the presence of blue-green algae is related to phosphorous and asked what triggers the blooms. Commission Engineer Chandler went into detail about the lab results of the Sweeny Lake samples from before the big rains in June compared to after and said that a hypothesis is that the phosphorous that entered the lake from the rainfalls triggered the blooms. Sweeney Lake resident Jeff Weber noted that the lake was clear before the big rains in June. He said that it seems that the system isn't designed for the worst case scenarios such as the large rains, so the system needs to be dramatically improved. Mr. Weber said that the residents want to use the lake, and if it is mandated to stay out of the lake,then it should be stated as such and not left open to interpretation. Resident Sharma Hanson provided comments and said that as she told the Sweeney Lake Association,she has had some HAZMAT training and so is using a field test kit to test for the toxin Microcystin. She said that the kit results show that the toxin is still present in low levels in little pockets in the lake although the levels in the main pools of the lake are lower than 0.5,which she explained is an acceptable level for surface water according to the World Health Organization. 4 BCWMC July 17, 2014, Meeting Minutes Mr. Oliver said that the City of Golden Valley would appreciate it if she would share the data. There was discussion of the procedure for determining which labs the Commission Engineer uses for processing the samples. Northwood Lake resident Laura Leonhardt said that Northwood Lake has had quite an algae bloom as well. She said she has seen people out on the lake kayaking and stand-up paddle boarding and she is concerned about the possible presence of blue-green algae. Sweeney Lake Resident Christy Lueck commented that she has lived on the lake for 40 years and in that time the lake has never been this bad for this long. She said that she is highly concerned and appreciates anything that the Commission can do to help. Ms. Hanson mentioned a citizen program through the University of Nebraska in which the volunteers use kits to test for blue-green algae. She said that an idea for the Commission for next year is to buy such kits and have citizens monitor for the algae. The Commission directed Administrator Jester to look into it. Commissioner Black moved to approve the request from Golden Valley for funds in the amount of$1,100 for the additional sample collection and toxin analysis. Commissioner Elder seconded the motion.Commissioner Mueller asked where the funds would come from in the Commission's budget. Engineer Chandler noted that the Administrator recommended the funds come from the Commission's Surveys and Studies fund. Commissioner Welch asked if allocating these funds would mean that something else would no longer be able to get done. Commission Engineer Chandler responded"no". There was a short discussion about the additional sampling in July and August. Mr. Oliver said more sampling in the end of September may be warranted but at this point that decision is premature. Upon a vote,the motion carried 7-0 [Cities of Minnetonka and Robbinsdale absent from vote]. Commissioner Welch wanted to know if the Commission would know if the blue-green algae blooms were occurring on Northwood Lake. Engineer Chandler said the Commission is not monitoring Northwood Lake this summer and would have no data on algae. She said if the Commission wants something similar done on Northwood Lake such as the sampling on Sweeney Lake,the cost would be similar to the described cost of the additional sampling of Sweeney Lake. There was discussion of getting a test kit to the CAMP volunteer for Northwood Lake to sample for the blue- green algae toxin in order to see if additional analysis is needed. Commissioner Elder said that he would talk to the City of New Hope about the City covering the cost of the kit. There was also discussion about bringing in an expert to present to the Commission information on algae. Commissioner McDonald Black said that blue-green algae is a major issue and suggested that the Commission develop a plan to address it such as a special committee or task force. TAC member Erick Francis said the City of St. Louis Park is being contacted with questions about blue-green algae, and St. Louis Park doesn't even have any recreational lakes. He recommended that the Commission and TAC meet to specifically talk about how to approach this issue. The Commission directed Administrator Jester and Engineer Chandler to contact other agencies in Minnesota such as the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), Department of Health, Department of Natural Resources to find out if they have a handle on where the blue-green algae is coming from and to report back at a top level to the Commission. The Commission also directed staff to coordinate someone coming in and educating the Commission on the issue at the August meeting. C. Receive Update on Schaper Pond Diversion Project 5 BCWMC July 17, 2014, Meeting Minutes Chair de Lambert reported that he,TAC member Jeff Oliver and Commission Engineer Len Kremer recently met with MPCA Commissioners John Linc Stine and other MPCA staff regarding the Schaper Pond project. He reported that there was a positive reaction to the proposed project. Mr. Oliver reminded the Commission that it had authorized the feasibility report and final design for this project,and after the feasibility report was completed there were some issues with the permitting of the project. He said that due to those issues the City of Golden Valley opted not to pursue project design at that point.Mr. Oliver described the recent meeting on the project.He said he was encouraged that the MPCA Commissioner committed to finding a solution with the caveat that the City, Commission,and MPCA likely will not get everything they each are looking for and that the solution needs to be able to be applied state-wide.He described a forum that will occur later in the summer and said he'll keep the Commission apprised. Mr. Oliver said that the City is waiting on a proposal for the design of the project and that the Commission will see the proposed agreement at the next Commission meeting.He said that he hopes that the project will be built this year. D. Update on Next Generation Watershed Management Plan Development i. Plan Steering Committee Meeting Notes from 5/19/14 and 6/9/14 Plan Steering Committee Chair Linda Loomis provided an update on the recent meetings and the planning process. ii. Commission Workshop Monday,August 114:00 p.m.to 6:00 p.m. , Golden Valley City Hall There was discussion of the goals of the workshop. The Commission set the workshop for Monday, August 11 from 4:00 to 6:00 p.m. at Golden Valley City Hall. E. Approval to Request Extension of Clean Water Fund Grant for 2012 Main Stem Restoration Project Commissioner Welch reported that the 2012 Main Stem Restoration Project in Wirth Park has been delayed due to a delay in receiving a permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. He summarized the project and its funding and contracting. He said that he would provide an update again at next month's Commission meeting. Commissioner Welch moved approval of requesting an extension of the Clean Water Fund grant for the 2012 Main Stem Restoration Project. Commissioner Black seconded the motion. Upon a vote,the motion carried 7-0 [Cities of Minnetonka and Robbinsdale absent from vote]. 6. COMMUNICATIONS A. Administrator: No Administrator Communications B. Chair:No Chair Communications C. Commissioners: No Commissioner Communications D. TAC Members:No TAC Communications E. Committees: No Committee Communications F. Legal Counsel:No Legal Communications G. Engineer: i. Engineer Chandler reported that the Commission Administrator asked for a follow up on reports 6 BCWMC July 17, 2014, Meeting Minutes of a sewage discharge into Bassett Creek. Engineer Chandler said that she received confirmation of the discharge into Bassett Creek,just downstream of the Medicine Lake Outlet at the manhole on the east side of the creek. Engineer Chandler said that the report confirmed that the discharge was 1,000 gallons over an 18-hour period due to the lift station being at capacity so everything was backing up. ii. Engineer Chandler said that the Commission Engineer asked the Metropolitan Council to perform a trend analysis on the chloride results at the WOMP station. She said that the Met Council has done the analysis,which shows that over the 10 to 12-year sample period there is an increasing trend in chloride concentration. She said that the analysis appears to show a leveling off in more recent years but more years of data are needed before a conclusive trend can be detected. Engineer Chandler said that the Metropolitan Council says that a report will be coming. iii. Engineer Chandler announced that Hennepin County started a water consortium and the first meeting is on July 22. She said that she plans to attend the meeting in Administrator Jester's absence. iv. Engineer Chandler noted that the recent water level of Medicine Lake reached 889.44,which perhaps wasn't even the peak level and which is the highest measured since 1991. She reported that the recent water level on Sweeney Lake was the highest since 2005 and that the water elevations at the structure at Wirth Lake Golf Course were still high but below the levels of the 10-year event. V. Engineer Chandler said that she has the Department of Natural Resources June hydrology report and can have staff forward it to Chair de Lambert. 7. INFORMATION ONLY(Available at http://w-ww.bassettereekwmo.org/,M A. Grant Tracking Summary and Spreadsheet B. WCA Notices,Plymouth C. Metro Blooms Collaboration with Blue Thumb D. WMWA April and May Meeting Minutes 8.ADJOURNMENT 7 BCWMC July 17, 2014, Meeting Minutes Chair de Lambert adjourned the Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission Regular Meeting at 10:42 a.m. Amy Herbert, Recorder Date Secretary Date 8 Cy tl Ii" ft go t a e l V. MEMORANDUM vaney Administrative Services Department 763-593-8013/763-593-3969(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting October 7, 2014 Agenda Item 3. E. 1. Waiver of Public Hearing and Certification of Special Assessments - 2014 City-Wide Sewer Prepared By Sue Virnig, Finance Director Summary Agreements have been signed with the property owners regarding total costs for sanitary sewer repairs and waiving the public hearing pursuant to Minnesota Statues 429.031. This work has been done by the city contractor for sewer repairs. This program is offered to those property owners interested that are outside the current Pavement Management Area and so wish to have their sanitary repairs paid with property taxes. The City needs to have a contract setup with the property owner before this option is available. Attachments • List of City-Wide Sanitary Sewer Improvements Assessed in 2014 (1 page) • Resolution Waiving the Public Hearing Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 429.031 and Ordering Certification of Special Assessments on Private Sanitary Sewer Repairs in 2014 (1 page) Recommended Action Motion to adopt Resolution Waiving the Public Hearing Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 429.031 and Ordering Certification of Special Assessments on Private Sanitary Sewer Repairs in 2014. CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY 2014 CITY-WIDE SANITARY SEWER REPAIR LEVY 18831 PID ADDRESS ASSESSMENT 17-029-24-24-0033 1918 GLENWOOD PKWY $4,280.00 05-117-21-23-0041 1023 WINNETKA AVE S 5,345.00 TOTAL $9,625.00 Resolution 14-75 October 7, 2014 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION WAIVING THE PUBLIC HEARING PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA STATUTES 429.031 AND ORDERING CERTIFICATION OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS ON PRIVATE SANITARY SEWER REPAIRS IN 2014 Project Years Interest Rate First Year Levy Total Assessed 2014 Sanitary 5 6% 2015 $9,625.00 Sewer Repairs 1. Each individual address (lots) will be assessed the full value of the signed contract with the homeowner for the various sanitary sewer repair(s). 2. The proposed assessments are hereby adopted and confirmed as the proper assessments for each of said property respectively together with interest at the rate of six (6) percent per annum accruing on the full amount thereof unpaid, shall be a lien concurrent with general taxes upon parcel and all thereof. The total amount of each such assessment not prepaid shall be payable in equal annual principal installments extending over a period of 5 years, as indicated in each case. 3. The first of said installments, together with interest on the entire assessment for the period of January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015, will be payable with general taxes for the year of 2014, collectible in 2015, and one of each of the remaining installments, together with one year's interest on that and all other unpaid installments, will be paid with general taxes for each consecutive year thereafter unless the entire assessment is paid in full by November 14, 2014. 4. The owner may pay off the assessment in full after November 14, 2014 with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. 5. The City Clerk shall, as soon as may be, prepare and transmit to the County Auditor a certified duplicate of the assessment roll, with each installment and interest on each unpaid assessment set forth separately, to be extended upon the proper tax lists of the County and the County Auditor shall thereafter collect said assessment in the manner provided by law. Shepard Harris, Mayor ATTEST: Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by the City Clerk. city 0 gotaen!'V4" MEMORANDUM valley Administrative Services Department 763-593-80131763-593-3969(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting October 7, 2014 Agenda Item 3. E. 2. Waiver of Public Hearing and Certification of Special Assessments - 2014 Sewer Repairs Prepared By Sue Virnig, Finance Director Summary Agreements have been signed with the property owners located in the 2014 PMP regarding total costs for sanitary sewer repairs and waiving the public hearing pursuant to Minnesota Statues 429.031. This work has been done by the city contractor for sewer repairs. Attachments • List of Sanitary Sewer Improvements in 2014 PMP (1 page) • Resolution Waiving the Public Hearing Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 429.031 and Ordering Certification of Special Assessments on Private Sanitary Sewer Repairs that involve 2014 Street Improvements (1 page) Recommended Action Motion to adopt Resolution Waiving the Public Hearing Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 429.031 and Ordering Certification of Special Assessments on Private Sanitary Sewer Repairs that involve 2014 Street Improvements. CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY 2014 PMP SANITARY SEWER LEVY 18815 ASSESSMENT PID ADDRESS ASSESSMENT PAID BALANCE 05-117-21-11-0007 135 EDGEWOOD AVE S 5,285.00 5,285.00 05-117-21-11-0015 6560 CORTLAWN CIRCLE N 3,472.15 3,472.15 0.00 32-118-21-43-0046 110 IDAHO AVE N 5,240.00 5,240.00 13,997.15 3,472.15 10,525.00 Resolution 14-76 October 7, 2014 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION WAIVING THE PUBLIC HEARING PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA STATUTES 429.031 AND ORDERING CERTIFICATION OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS ON PRIVATE SANITARY SEWER REPAIRS THAT INVOLVE 2014 CITY STREET IMPROVEMENTS Project Years Interest Rate First Year Levy Total Assessed 2014 PMP Sanitary Sewer 10 6% 2015 $13,997.15 Repairs 1. Each individual address (lots) will be assessed the full value of the signed contract with the homeowner for the various sanitary sewer repair(s). 2. The proposed assessments are hereby adopted and confirmed as the proper assessments for each of said property respectively together with interest at the rate of six (6) percent per annum accruing on the full amount thereof unpaid, shall be a lien concurrent with general taxes upon parcel and all thereof. The total amount of each such assessment not prepaid shall be payable in equal annual principal installments extending over a period of 10 years, as indicated in each case. 3. The first of said installments, together with interest on the entire assessment for the period of January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015, will be payable with general taxes for the year of 2014, collectible in 2015, and one of each of the remaining installments, together with one year's interest on that and all other unpaid installments, will be paid with general taxes for each consecutive year thereafter unless the entire assessment is paid in full by November 14, 2014. 4. The owner may pay off the assessment in full after November 14, 2014 with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. 5. The City Clerk shall, as soon as may be, prepare and transmit to the County Auditor a certified duplicate of the assessment roll, with each installment and interest on each unpaid assessment set forth separately, to be extended upon the proper tax lists of the County and the County Auditor shall thereafter collect said assessment in the manner provided by law. Shepard Harris, Mayor ATTEST: Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by the City Clerk. city 0� gotaen EMORANDUM valley Administrative Services Department 763-593-8013/763-593-3969(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting October 7, 2014 Agenda Item 3. F. Appointment of Election Judges and Absentee Ballot Board for the General Election to be held on November 4, 2014 Prepared By Kris Luedke, City Clerk Summary As required in State Statute 204B.21, Council needs to approve the appointment of the Election Judges and Absentee Ballot Board for the upcoming General Election. The Absentee Ballot Board judges will have the responsibility of accepting and rejecting absentee ballots based on the criteria set by the State. Hennepin County will approve judges that will be responsible for accepting/rejecting all in person absentee ballots received at the Hennepin County Government Center counter. Those ballots then will be sent to the City for counting. Attachments • Resolution approving the appointment of Election Judges and Absentee Ballot Board for the General Election on November 4, 2014 (2 pages) Recommended Action Motion to adopt Resolution approving the appointment of Election Judges and Absentee Ballot Board for the General Election to be held on November 4, 2014. Resolution 14-77 October 7, 2014 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION APPROVING THE APPOINTMENT OF ELECTION JUDGES AND ABSENTEE BALLOT BOARD FOR THE GENERAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON NOVEMBER 4, 2014 WHEREAS, Minnesota Election Law 20413.21 requires that persons serving as election judges be appointed by the Council at least 25 days before the election; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Golden Valley City Council that the individuals named on Exhibit A, and on file in the office of the City Clerk be appointed as the City of Golden Valley Election Judges and Absentee Ballot Board Judges for the November 4, 2014 General Election; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED the Golden Valley City Council also appoints other individuals and all members appointed to the Hennepin County Absentee Ballot Board as authorized under Minn. Stat. 20413.21, subd. 2 under the direction of the Election Manager to serve as members of the Golden Valley Absentee Ballot Board; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is with this, authorized to make any substitutions or additions as deemed necessary. Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by the City Clerk. Resolution 14-77 - Continued October 7, 2014 Exhibit A 2014 Election Judges The following individuals are appointed to serve in the 2014 State General Election: Anderson, Susan Jones, Shirley Vodovoz, Helen Anderson, Tracy Jorgens, Gwen Wells, Jackie Ballard, Kirk Keller, Audra Wertheimer, Marcia Barnard, Andra Kempfert, James Whalen, Colleen Barret, Roger Kilner, Marilyn Wobschall, Georgeann Bartol, Colin King, Dwayne Yeager, Carrie Bergman, Roger Kisling, Elizabeth Zamorano, Lauren Bergquist, Lois Korsman, Daniel Bongard, LouAnn Krenn, Barbara Absentee Ballot Board Burkholder, John Krishef, Dale Cole, Jack Carlson, Philip Lueck, Christy Hera, Jack Carlson, Dennis Lund, Charles Hietala, Connie Cohen, Gary Magnuson, Pat Hill, Mary Condon, Marilyn Moore, Pat Jones, Shirley Cooper, Nancy Moore, Tom Stresemann, Marjorie Courey, Barbara Myers, Kay Van Hook, Mary Cowan, Martin Olfe, Janet Watson, Sue Day, Kathleen Osvold, Bruce Weber, Meagan Decker, Kay Osvold, Dianne Decker, Daniel Pagenkopf, Jane Dietz, Arlene Palmquist, Lois Drysdale, Robert Plager, Jan Dystra, Anne Repke, Michele Fortman, Lloyd Reynolds, Anne Gaffney, Mary Scanlon, Thomas George, Teresa Scanlon, Dolores George, Janet Schlaege, Marcie George, Cary Segelbaum, Amy Girard, Pierre Sell, Glennys Haggberg-Miller, Susan Sell, Mike Hanson, Gary Stresemann, Marjorie Hasselbusch, Cynthia Strobel, Nancy Hera, James Sunderland, Delphine Herberg, Suzanne Tenenbaum, Phillip Hiebert, John Thompson, Sylvia Hietala, Connie Tiffin, Marie Hill, Betty Tillman, Barb Hill, Mary Toll, Sharon Hoffman, Jay Tomko, Patricia Hoffstedt, Diane Tvedt, Gordon Hutchinson, Chestine Van Heel, Barbara 1psen, Nancy Van Hook, Mary Johnson, Maria Van Horn, Ruby city oId ;gotaen1!'-V' valley Planning Department 763-593-8095/763-593-8109(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting October 7, 2014 Agenda Item 3. G. Receipt of Notice of Metropolitan Council Action - Comprehensive Plan Amendment - 305 and 345 Pennsylvania Avenue South Prepared By Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager Summary To accommodate residential development at 305 and 345 Pennsylvania Avenue South (Laurel Ponds), the City Council voted to amend the Comprehensive Plan to designate the properties as "Medium-Low Density Residential." Following the City's action,the Metropolitan Council reviewed the amendment, and ultimately approved it. As a final step in this process, the City must now receive and file the Notice of Metropolitan Council Action. Attachments • Letter from the Metropolitan Council dated September 29, 2014 (2 pages) Recommended Action Motion to receive and file Notice of Metropolitan Council Action regarding the General Land Use Plan, Comprehensive Plan Amendment for 305 and 345 Pennsylvania Avenue South. Metropolitan Council i September 29,2014 Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager City of Golden Valley 7800 Golden Valley Road Golden Valley, MN 55427 RL: City of Golden Valley,Laurel Ponds Comprehensive Plan Amendment— Administrative Review Metropolitan Council Review File No. 20585-4 Metropolitan Council District 6 Dear Mr. Zimmerman: The Metropolitan Council received the City's Laurel Ponds comprehensive plan amendment(CPA)on September 9,2014. The CPA reguides approximately 3.3 acres of land related to a redevelopment project that proposes 30 detached townhomes at approximately 9.1 units per acre. The CPA reguides 2.8 acres from Mixed-Use to Medium-Low Residential and 0.5 acres from Low Density Residential to Medium- Low Density Residential. Council staff finds the CPA meets the Comprehensive Plan Amendment Administrative Review Guidelines revised by the Council on July 28, 2010. The proposed CPA does not affect official forecasts or the City's ability to accommodate its share of the region's affordable housing need. It does, however, contribute to meeting the City's growth forecasts as well as life-cycle housing need. Therefore,the Council will waive further review and action, and the City may place this CPA into effect. In addition, staff offers the following advisory comments: Water Supply (Lanya Ross, 651-602-1803) The project area is located within the St. Louis Park Drinking Water Supply Management Area, which has been designated as highly vulnerable to contamination by that city and the MN Department of Health. Consult the St. Louis Park Wellhead Protection Plan to ensure development is consistent with the city's drinking water protection strategies. The Council encourages efforts to promote the efficient use of water to protect and enhance the region's water supply sources. New development and redevelopment always provide opportunities to implement new water conservation and stormwater management strategies as part of construction and site landscaping. The Council's Conservation Toolbox and Stormwater Reuse Guide may be useful tools to reduce per capita water demand. Both can be found on the Council's Water Supply Planning website at: www.metrocouncil.orWWastewater-Water/Plannin /g Water-Supply-Plaiining/Guidaiice-and-Planning Tools.asnx. www.metrocouncil.org 390 Robert Street North • St. Paul, MN 55101-1805 • (651)602-1000 • Fax(651) 602-1550 • TTY(651)291-0904 An Equal Opportunity Employer Jason Zimmerman September 29,2014 Page 2 The CPA,explanatory materials, and the information submission form will be appended to the City's Update in the Council's files, If you have any questions please contact Michael Larson,Principal Reviewer, at 651-602-1407. SiVeBarqjas, l T Mana er Local Planning Assistance cc: Crystal Sheppeck, Minnesota Housing Tod Sherman,Development Reviews Coordinator,MnDOT Metro Division James Brimeyer, Metropolitan Council District 6 Michael Larson, AICP, Principal Reviewer Raya Esmaeili, Reviews Coordinator i.enttn.. r ,'.'i u;u;,ut:,,„>{. ::1.:, il . ....,u.' .� .,. . ,_„Rj .. i a.aPc, ,;;is..P.,S. ;lu;.rtrar:iu.::cu•',:'e city a golden MEMORANDUM valley City Administration/Council 763-593-3989/763-593-8109(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting October 7, 2014 Agenda Item 3. H. Authorization to Sign Police Sergeants (LELS Local 304) Agreement Prepared By: Chantell Knauss, Assistant City Manager Summary A two-year agreement with LELS Local 304, the Police Sergeants unit, has been settled through negotiations and binding arbitration. The arbitration award provides for the following: 2.5% increase in wages on January 1, 2014 and January 1, 2015. This is the same increase the Police Officers LELS Local 27 reached settlement for years 2014 and 2015 and all non- union employees received in 2014. The City and LELS Local 304 reached agreement on the following issues through negotiations: Duration of the Agreement from January 1, 2014- December 31, 2015; Monthly health insurance contribution, including the $20 wellness incentive, for 2014 $1,147 and the same health insurance contribution that all other employees receive in 2015; Adjustment to the clothing allowance for employees in non-uniformed special assignments to $650.89 annually in 2014. This item authorizes the Mayor and City Manager to sign the agreement. Attachments • Labor Agreement- LELS Police Sergeants 2014-2015 (19 pages) Recommended Action Motion to authorize the Mayor and City Manager to sign the 2014-2015 Police Sergeants (LELS Local #304) Labor Agreement. LABOR AGREEMENT BETWEEN POLICE SERGEANTS (CELS LOCAL #304) AND THE CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY 2014 - 2015 INDEX Article Title Page Introduction and Definitions 1 1 Purpose of Agreement 1 2 Recognition 1 3 Employer Authority 2 4 Union Security 3 5 Employer Security 3 6 Equal Application 4 7 Savings 4 8 Grievance Procedure 4 9 Safety 7 10 Seniority and Time in Grade 7 11 Discipline 8 12 Work Schedules 9 13 Court Time 9 14 Sick Leave 9 15 Funeral Leave 10 16 Termination Pay 10 17 Leaves of Absence 11 18 Vacation Leave 11 19 Holidays 12 20 Paid Time Off(PTO) 12 21 Injury on Duty 12 22 Administrative Leave/Light Duty 13 23 Qualifications for Continuing Employment 13 24 Personal Liability Insurance 14 25 Standby 14 26 Educational Reimbursement 14 27 Training 14 28 Salaries and Benefits 15 29 Overtime Pay 16 30 Call Back 16 31 Duration 17 LABOR AGREEMENT SERGEANTS 2014-2015 This Agreement dated October 7, 2014 is made and entered into by and between the City of Golden Valley, hereinafter referred to as the Employer and Law Enforcement Labor Services, Local #304 representing the Golden Valley Police Sergeants, hereinafter referred to as the Union. DEFINITIONS For the purpose of this Agreement, the following terms and phrases shall have the meaning given to them: EMPLOYER: City of Golden Valley or its Representatives UNION: Law Enforcement Labor Services Local 304 (LELS) EMPLOYEE: A member of the exclusively recognized bargaining unit OFFICER: Officer elected or appointed by the Union. MEMBER: A member of the LELS Local 304 to which this contract applies. ARTICLE 1. Purpose of Agreement. This Agreement has as its purpose the promotion of harmonious relations between the Employer, its Employees and the Union, the furtherance of efficient governmental services; the establishment of an equitable and peaceful procedure for the resolution of disputes that may arise without interference or disruption of efficient operation of the department; and the establishment of a formal understanding relative to all terms and conditions of employment. The Employer and the Union, through this Agreement, continue their dedication to the highest quality of public service. Both parties recognize this Agreement is a pledge of this dedication. ARTICLE 2. Recognition. Section 1. The Employer recognizes the Union as the exclusive representative under Minnesota Statutes 179.71, Subdivision 3, for all employees of the Golden Valley Police Department bargaining unit as identified by the Bureau of Mediation Services, certification of Exclusive Representative dated January 1, 1982, Case No. 82-PR-277-A. Section 2. In the event that the Employer and the Union are unable to agree as to the inclusion or exclusion of a new or modified job class, the issue shall be submitted to the Bureau of Mediation for determination. ARTICLE 3. Employer Authority. Section 1. It is recognized and accepted by the Union and Employer that the management, direction and control of the Police Department and its personnel are exclusively the function of the Employer. The exercise of the City's management rights shall take place "without hindrance or interference by the Union", except as limited by the terms of this Agreement. City's management rights include, but shall under no circumstances be construed to be limited to, the right to: a. Manage the operation through the selection and direction of the work force, including the right to hire and promote, transfer Employees to positions, departments and classifications both covered and not covered by this Agreement, except that no Employee shall be transferred out of the Bargaining Unit as a disciplinary action. b. Layoff Employees c. Demote, suspend, discipline or discharge Employees d. Make such operating changes as deemed necessary by the Employer for the efficient, economical operation of the City, including but not limited to the right to sub-contract work performed by members of the Bargaining Unit, to change the normal work week, the length of the normal work day, hours of work, the beginning or ending time of each shift or assignment and the number of shifts to be operated. e. Determine the organizational structure, number of personnel and the assignment of duties, including the right to increase, decrease or change duties. f. Establish functions, programs, its overall budget and the utilization of technology. g. Promulgate work rules and regulations. Section 2. Any specifically enumerated management right not limited by the terms of this Agreement shall not be eligible to be grieved by the Union. Section 3. Any terms and conditions of employment not specifically established or modified by this Agreement shall remain solely with the discretion of the Employer to modify, establish or eliminate. 2 ARTICLE 4. Union Security. Section 1. A. The Employer agrees to cooperate with the Union in the deduction of regular monthly dues, for those Employees who request in writing to have regular monthly Union dues checked off by payroll deduction. The Employer agrees to remit such regular monthly dues in a manner to be determined by the Union and Employer. B. The Union agrees to indemnify and hold the Employer harmless against any and all claims, suits, orders or judgment brought or issued against the Employer as a result of any action taken or not taken by the Employer under the provisions of paragraph A of this Section. Section 2. The Union may designate members to act as stewards or officers and shall inform the Employer of such choice and of any changes in stewards or officers in writing. Section 3. The Employer agrees to make space available on the Employer bulletin board for the posting of Union notice(s) and announcements and to make space available for Union meetings when it does not conflict with the operation of the department. Section 4. The Employer agrees to allow the officers and representatives of the Bargaining Unit reasonable time off and leaves of absence, with prior approval and without pay for the purpose of conducting Union business when such time would not be detrimental to the work programs of the Employer. Section 5. The Employer agrees to post on the department bulletin board all promotional opportunities within the Bargaining Unit; to publish the method by which promotions shall be made within the Bargaining Unit; and to make copies of all work rules and regulations available to Employees. ARTICLE 5. Employer Security. Section 1. Neither the Union, its officers or agents, nor any of the Employees covered by this Agreement will engage in, encourage, sanction, support or suggest any strike, slowdown, mass resignations, mass absenteeism, the willful absence from one's position, stoppage of work or the absence in whole or part of the full, faithful and proper performance of duties of employment for the purpose of inducing, influencing, or coercing a change in the conditions, compensation or the rights, privileges or obligations of employment. Section 2. Any Employee who engages in a strike may have his/her appointment terminated by the Employer effective the date the violation first occurs. Such termination shall be effective upon written notice served upon the Employee. 3 ARTICLE 6. Equal Application. Section 1. The provisions of this Agreement shall be applied equally to all Employees in the Bargaining Unit without discrimination as to race, color, creed, sex, national origin, religion, political affiliation or marital status. The Union and the Employees covered by this Agreement shall share equally with the Employer the responsibilities established by this Article. Section 2. The Employer shall not discriminate against, interfere with, restrain, or coerce an Employee from exercising the right to join or not to join the Union or participate in an official capacity on behalf of the Union, which is in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement. The Union shall not discriminate against, interfere with, restrain, or coerce an Employee from exercising the right to join or not to join the Union and will not discriminate against any Employee in the administration of the Agreement because of non- membership in the Union. Section 3. The Union accepts its responsibilities as exclusive representative and agrees to represent all Employees in the Bargaining Unit without discrimination. ARTICLE 7. Savings. Section 1. This Agreement is subject to the laws of the United States and the State of Minnesota. Section 2. In the event that any provision of this Agreement shall be held to the contrary of law by a court of competent jurisdiction from whose final judgment or decree no appeal has been taken within the time provided, such provision shall be voided. All other provisions of this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect. The voided provisions may be renegotiated upon written request of either party. ARTICLE 8. Grievance Procedure. Section 1. A. For the purpose of this Agreement, the term "grievance" means any disputes arising concerning the interpretation or application of the express provisions of this Agreement. B. In the event of such grievance arising there shall be no suspension of operations but an earnest effort shall be made to resolve such grievances in the manner prescribed by this Agreement. C. It is recognized and accepted by the Union and the Employer that the processing of grievances, as herein provided, is limited by the job duties and responsibilities of the Employee and shall therefore be accomplished during normal working hours only when consistent with such Employee duties and responsibilities. The aggrieved Employee and the Union Representative shall be allowed a reasonable amount of time without loss in pay 4 when a grievance is investigated and presented to the Employer during normal working hours provided the Employee and the Union Representative have notified and received prior approval from the designated supervisor who has determined that such absence is reasonable and would not be detrimental to the work programs of the Employer. Section 2. Grievances, as defined by Section 1, shall be resolved in conformance with the following procedure and all references to days in Steps 1-4 are calendar days: Step 1. An Employee who feels that the City has misinterpreted or misapplied any section of the Agreement in dealing with that Employee, should discuss his/her claim with the Employee's immediate supervisor. This should be done within fourteen (14) calendar days from the occurrence of the believed violation or from when the Employee became aware of it. The Employee should complete the grievance notice sheet and submit it to the supervisor at the time of the discussion with the supervisor. The supervisor will respond, in writing, within ten (10) days from the date the grievance sheet was received. Every effort shall be made to settle the grievance at this step. Nothing shall prevent an Employee from seeking guidance from the Union at this step. Step 2. If the dispute is not solved at Step 1 between the Employee and the supervisor, then the Employee should meet with the Union and the dispute should be put in writing, stating the nature of the grievance, the name or names of the Employees involved, the provisions of the Agreement believed violated and the remedy requested. This shall be submitted to the Employer- designated Step 2 Representative within ten (10) calendar days of the Step 1 written response. The Step 2 Representative shall render an answer, in writing, within ten (10) days of the receipt of the Step 2 submittal and the answer shall be transmitted to the Employee and THE UNION. Step 3. If the dispute is not solved by the Step 2 process, the written grievance with the information required in Step 2, shall be presented to the Employer-designated Step 3 Representative. This shall be submitted within ten (10) days of receipt of the Step 2 answer. The Step 3 Employer-designated Representative shall render a written answer within ten (10) days from receipt of the Step 3 grievance and the answer shall be transmitted to the Employee and THE UNION. Where no Employer Step 3 Representative is appointed, the grievance shall progress from Step 3 to Step 4. Step 4. A grievance unresolved in Step 3 may be appealed by the Employee and THE UNION to Step 4. Notification of intent to appeal to Step 4 shall be made within ten (10) days of receipt of 5 Employer's Step 3 answer. The Union shall notify the Bureau of Mediation Services within ten (10) calendar days of the notice of appeal to the Employer that the Union is submitting the matter to arbitration and the Union shall request that the Bureau of Mediation Services provide the parties with a list of arbitrators. The selection of an arbitrator shall be made in accordance with the rules and regulations as established by the Bureau of Mediation Services. The Union must provide the Employer with written communication within one-hundred eighty (180) calendar days of the date that the Bureau of Mediation Services has mailed the parties a list of arbitrators as to whether or not the Union intends to proceed to arbitration. The one-hundred eighty (180) calendar days may be extended by written, mutual agreement by both parties. Section 3. A. The arbitrator shall have no right to amend, modify, nullify, ignore, add to or subtract from, the terms and conditions of this Agreement. The arbitrator shall consider and decide only the specific issue(s) submitted in writing by the Employer and the Union, and shall have no authority to make a decision on any other issue not so submitted. B. The arbitrator shall be without power to make decisions contrary to, or inconsistent with, or modifying or varying in any way the application of laws, rules or regulations having the force and effect of law. The arbitrator's decision shall be submitted in writing within thirty (30) days following close of the hearing or the submission of briefs by the parties, whichever be later, unless the parties agree to an extension. The arbitrator shall consider and decide only the specific issue or issues submitted to him by the parties of this Agreement and shall have no authority to make a decision on any other matter not submitted to him, and the decision shall be binding on both the Employer and the Union. C. The fees and expenses for the arbitrator's services and proceedings shall be borne equally by the Employer and the Union provided that each party shall be responsible for compensating their own representative and witnesses. If either party desires a verbatim record of the proceedings, they may cause such a record to be made providing they pay for the record. If both parties desire a verbatim record of the proceedings, the cost shall be shared equally. Section 4. Waiver. If a grievance is not presented within the time limits set forth above, it shall be considered "waived". If a grievance is not appealed to the next step within the specific time limit or any agreed extension thereof, it shall be considered settled on the basis of the Employer's last answer. If the Employer does not answer a grievance or an appeal thereof within the specified time limits, the Union may elect to treat the grievance as denied at that step and immediately appeal the grievance to the next step. The time limit in each step may be extended by mutual written agreement of the Employer and the Union in each step. 6 Section 5. Choice of Remedy. If, as a result of the written Employer response in Step 2, the grievance remains unresolved, the grievance may be appealed either to Step 3 of Article 8 or a procedure such as: Civil Service, Veteran's Preference, or Fair Employment. If appealed to any procedure other than Step 3 of Article 8 the grievance is not subject to the arbitration procedure as provided in Step 4 of Article 8. The aggrieved Employee shall indicate in writing which procedure is to be utilized - Step 3 of Article 8 or another appeal procedure - and shall sign a statement to the effect that the choice of any other hearing precludes the aggrieved Employee from making a subsequent appeal through Step 4 of Article 8. ARTICLE 9. Safety. The Employer and Union agree to jointly promote safe and healthful working conditions, to cooperate in safety matters and to encourage Employees to work in a safe manner. ARTICLE 10. Seniority and Time in Grade. Section 1. Definition. Seniority shall mean an Employee's length of services as a patrol officer and/or sergeant with the Department since his/her last date of hire. An Employee's continuous service record shall be broken only by separation from service by reasons of resignation, discharge for cause, retirement, death or leave of absence without pay. When two or more Employees have the same seniority date, their position on the seniority list shall be determined by their position on the Civil Service list when hired. Time in grade shall mean an Employee's length of service in his or her current rank with the department since his/her last date of promotion. Time in grade may only be broken by the same acts as defined above for seniority. The Union shall prepare a time in grade list and a roster by time in grade, to be submitted to the Employer for approval and posting. When two or more Employees have the same time in grade list, their position on the time in grade list shall be determined by their position on the Civil Service list when hired. Section 2. Lay Offs. When a reduction in the work force becomes necessary, the Employee with the least seniority shall be laid off first. The last Employee laid off shall be the first to be recalled for work. No new Employees shall be hired until the lay off list has been exhausted. If a reduction in the number of sergeants becomes necessary, the sergeant with the least time in grade shall be permitted to bump back into a patrol officer's position with less departmental seniority. Section 3. Probationary Employees. During the probationary period, a newly hired or rehired Employee may be discharged at the sole discretion of the Employer. During the probationary period a promoted Employee may be returned to his/her previous position at the sole discretion of the Employer. The probationary period shall be 1 year for promoted Employees and 1 year for new Employees from date of hire or completion of basic recruit school if completed while on City payroll. 7 ARTICLE 11. Discipline. Section 1. The Employer will discipline for cause only. Discipline will be one or more of the following forms: a. oral reprimand b. written reprimand c. suspension d. demotion, or e. discharge Section 2. An Employee who is to be suspended, demoted or discharged, shall receive a written statement of cause of the suspension, demotion or discharge within 72 hours after the action has been taken. Suspension will set forth the time period for which the suspension shall be effective. Demotions will state the classification to which the Employee is demoted. The Union shall be provided with a copy of such notice. Section 3. Written reprimands, notices of suspension or demotion and notices of discharge which are to become part of an Employee's personnel file shall be read and acknowledged by signature of the Employee. Such signature shall not be an admission of guilt but only an acknowledgment of receipt and the Employee shall have the opportunity to attach a response to the reprimand or notice to the copy in the Employee's personnel file. The Employee will receive a copy of such reprimands and/or notices. Section 4. A. Employees shall have the opportunity to request to have a representative present when a Garrity Warning is given prior to being questioned regarding a possible disciplinary action Section 5. Employees may not be suspended without pay for more than sixty (60) working days in any calendar year. Discharges will.be preceded by a five (5) calendar day suspension without pay. Section 6. Employees may examine their own individual personnel files at reasonable times under the direct supervision of the Employer. Union representatives may, upon invitation of the Employee, also examine the personnel files. Section 7. Grievances relating to this Article may be initiated by the Union in Step 3 of the grievance procedure. Section 8 Disciplinary Action The City will utilize two types of employee misconduct forms, temporary and permanent. Both shall be subject to the grievance procedure. Temporary misconduct forms shall be destroyed after one year. 8 ARTICLE 12. Work Schedules. Section 1. Sole authority in establishing work schedules is the Employer. The normal work year shall consist of 2,080 hours to be accounted for by each Employee through schedule of hours worked, holidays, roll call, training, vacations and/or paid-time off(PTO). Nothing contained in this or any other Article shall be interpreted to be a guarantee of a minimum or maximum number of hours the Employer may assign Employees. This Section shall also not be used for the computation of overtime. Section 2. Split shifts shall not be scheduled except by mutual agreement of City and affected Employees. Section 3. Changes in the format of duty schedules shall be posted two weeks in advance. ARTICLE 13. Court Time. Section 1. An Employee who is scheduled to appear in court during his or her off-duty time shall receive a minimum of four (4) hours straight time pay or pay at 1 1/2 times the Employee's pay rate for the actual number of hours spent in court, whichever is greater. An extension or early report to a regularly scheduled shift does not qualify the Employee for the minimum. When an Employee is notified of a cancellation of a court appearance less than 24 hours before the scheduled appearance, four (4) hours of straight time shall be paid. When an Employee is notified of a cancellation of a court appearance more than 24 hours prior to the scheduled appearance, no court time shall be authorized. Court time shall also include time spent in depositions and in attorney preparation meetings with attorneys representing the City of Golden Valley. Section 2. The City shall make reimbursements for necessary parking fees incurred when appearances in Court are required. ARTICLE 14. Sick Leave. Each permanent full-time Employee shall be granted eight (8) hours sick leave with pay for each month of full-time employment and will be allowed to accrue credit for earned sick leave to a total of eight hundred (800) hours. For every day of sick leave an Employee earns after he has accumulated eight hundred hours, he/she will be given credit for four (4) hours additional vacation and four (4) hours of pay, computed at the end of each year. Sick leave may not be used during the first 6 months of employment, but will be credited for use following the first 6 months of employment. Sick leave shall not be considered as a privilege which an Employee may use at his/her discretion, but shall be allowed in the case of actual illness, legal quarantine or disability of the Employee, or because of death or critical illness in his/her immediate family*, or to receive dental or medical care or other sickness preventative measures. Employees claiming sick leave may be required to file competent written evidence that he/she has been absent as authorized above, or if more than two days, that he/she has been under 9 treatment and supervision of a doctor or dentist who recommended work not be performed. If Employee has been incapacitated for the period of his/her absence or a major part thereof, he/she may be required to provide evidence that he/she is again physically able to perform his/her duties. Sick leave shall be computed on a working day basis when used. Sick leave is intended as a benefit primarily to the Employee himself/herself and as a protection or insurance of earning power. While it is permitted due to death or critical illness in the immediate family, it is intended to be available on a restricted basis and in limited amounts for this purpose. For discretionary attendance on family illness or medical needs, vacation or leave of absence should be used. All provisions and definitions of the Family and Medical Leave Act are incorporated into this sick leave provision. Employees hired under the PTO plan are subject to the provisions under Article 20. ARTICLE 15. Funeral Leave Up to five (5) days leave with pay without deduction from sick leave and/or PTO shall be granted to death of spouse or child. Up to three (3) days sick leave and or PTO where applicable shall be granted for death in the immediate family or person residing as a member of the employee's immediate household and up to one day in the case of death in the next degree of kindred. Immediate family includes any person having the following relationship to an employee or a living or deceased spouse: • stepchild • parent • mother-in-law/father-in-law • sister/brother • sister-in-law/brother-in-law • son-in-law/daughter-in-law • grandparents • grandparents-in-law • grandchildren • stepparents and/or legal guardians. ARTICLE 16. Termination Pay. Termination removes job rights and benefits and rehire status benefits as with a new Employee. Settlement of all benefits for the Employees who have been laid off, retired, or whose actions were not a factor in their termination shall be made 10 at termination as follows: Upon termination of service and after completion of five years of continuous service to the City as a full-time permanent Employee, an Employee shall be entitled to receive in pay 1/3 of unused sick leave in addition to accrued annual leave. Also, after 10 years of service or PERA certifiable disability that results in termination of employment, such Employees shall receive one days' pay for each full year of service to the City. In the event of death, payment shall be made to the survivor. ARTICLE 17. Leaves of Absence. Section 1. Jury Duty. Employees called for jury duty shall suffer no loss in their normal salary. Employees claiming jury duty pay shall sign over all jury duty fees to the Employer. Section 2. Military Service. Employees serving in the military shall suffer no loss in their normal salary to the extent provided by Minnesota Law or Federal Law. Section 3. Illness or Injury. A leave of absence without pay may be granted by the City Manager for up to 90 days for extended illness or personal hardship if such absence would not be detrimental to the Employer's work program. The Employee shall not be entitled to accrue leave or seniority while on a leave of absence without pay granted pursuant to this section. Section 4. Maternity/Paternity. Employees shall be granted up to 90 consecutive days for maternity or paternity leave. The Employee may use sick leave and vacation days that have been accumulated or all or part of the leave may be taken as an unpaid absence. Requests shall be made in writing to the City Manager. Extensions may be granted only by agreement of the City Manager. Section 5. Military. Employees shall be granted unpaid military leaves consistent with applicable Minnesota Statutes. Requests shall be made in writing to the City Manager. ARTICLE 18. Vacation Leave. Section 1. Employees shall be entitled to a paid vacation based upon service in the prior years. Annual leave shall be earned as follows: Date of Hire until completion of 5 years 2 weeks Over 5 years until completion of 10 years 3 weeks Over 11 years 3 weeks plus 1 day Over 12 years 3 weeks plus 2 days Over 13 years 3 weeks plus 3 days Over 14 years 3 weeks plus 4 days Over 15 years 4 weeks Over 16 years 4 weeks plus 1 day Over 17 years 4 weeks plus 2 days 11 Over 18 years 4 weeks plus 3 days Over 19 years 4 weeks plus 4 days Over 20 years and above 5 weeks No annual leave shall be granted during the initial six months of employment. But if an Employee satisfactorily completes the six-month period, annual leave accrued during the initial six-month period will be granted. Section 2. Vacations will, so far as possible, be granted at times most desired by the Employee except that the Employer shall have the final right to allot vacations in order to ensure the orderly operation of the City. Section 3. Employees shall be permitted to carry over double their current accumulation from one calendar year to the next. Section 4. Employees may request additional time off without pay up to a maximum of one year in a five-year period. Such requests shall be made in writing and are subject to the approval of the City Manager. Section 5. Employees hired under the PTO plan are subject to the provisions under Article20. ARTICLE 19. Holidays. Work schedules for Employees are made up without regard for weekends and holidays. In view of this fact, each Employee is granted 12 days (with one of those days as an unnamed floating holiday) leave each year in lieu of holidays. Holiday leave is added to vacation leave on a pro rata basis each pay period and shall be credited whether or not the Employee is scheduled to work on a holiday. These days must be taken during the year earned, except Christmas which may be carried over to the following year. Arrangements for taking vacation time must be arranged in advance with the supervisor in charge of the work schedule. Work on January 1, Martin Luther King Day, Presidents' Day, Memorial Day, July 4, Labor Day, Veteran's Day, Thanksgiving Day, the day after Thanksgiving, Christmas Eve Day and Christmas Day, will be compensated at the rate of time and one-half (1 1/2) the Employee's regular rate of pay for all hours worked on these holidays plus holiday time. ARTICLE 20. Paid-time Off(PTO) Employees hired after December 31, 2008 shall participate in the City's PTO plan. ARTICLE 21. Injury on Duty. Employees injured during the performance of their duties for the Employer and thereby rendered unable to work for the Employer will be paid the difference 12 between the Employer's regular pay and Worker's Compensation insurance payments for a period not to exceed one hundred twenty (120) working days per injury, not charged to the Employee's vacation, sick leave, PTO or other accumulated paid benefits, after a three (3) working days initial waiting period per injury. The three (3) working days waiting period shall be charged to the Employee's sick leave or PTO account less Worker's Compensation insurance payments. ARTICLE 22. Administrative Leave/Light Duty The City recognizes that from time to time, as a result of traumatic incidents happening on the job, Police Sergeants may experience stress reactions or other emotional problems that impact their ability to work efficiently and effectively. In light of the foregoing, the City's decision to grant administrative leave or light duty will be based on the following criteria: 1. That the sergeant is referred to a psychologist or other qualified mental health professional by the Police Chief. Self-referral with the concurrence of the department head will be deemed to be referral by the City. 2. The cost of any evaluation recommended by the Department will be borne by the City and the time spent by the sergeant undergoing the evaluation will be considered duty time. 3. Administrative leave/light duty shall be granted based on the recommendation of the Evaluator and a finding that the need for administrative leave/light duty is reasonably related to an incident occurring in the course and scope of the sergeant's employment with the City. 4. The Police Chief will be advised of all findings and recommendations of the Evaluator, excluding any background material that led to the finding and recommendation. 5. Any administrative leave/light duty granted will be for the purpose of obtaining treatment and/or counseling or participating in other activities prescribed by medical/mental health Evaluator. 6. Light duty or other assignment, consistent with medical recommendations may be granted. Persons on special assignment or light duty shall not be eligible for any special assignment pay unless they were so assigned at the time administrative leave or light duty was granted. 7. Treatment for drug and alcohol rehabilitation is specifically excluded from consideration for administrative leave. ARTICLE 23. Qualifications for Continuing Employment. Any Employee deprived of his/her state license to act as a police officer shall be suspended without pay during that period. 13 ARTICLE 24. Personal Liability Insurance. The City will maintain current personal injury liability insurance coverage throughout the duration of the contract. The Employer shall furnish legal counsel to defend any police officer in all actions brought against such officer to recover damages for alleged false arrest or alleged injury to person, property, or character, when such alleged false arrest or alleged injury to person, property, or character was the result of an arrest made by such officer in good faith and in the performance of his or her official duties and pay reasonable costs and expenses of defending such suit, including witness fees and reasonable counsel fees. ARTICLE 25. Standby. Employees specifically required by the Employer to stand by shall be paid for such standby time at the rate of one-hour regular pay for each hour of standby, with a minimum of two (2) hours of pay. ARTICLE 26. Educational Reimbursement. The City will reimburse 100% of the Employee expenses per calendar year, up to the non-taxable IRS maximum, for tuition, fees and books required for job-related educational courses upon completion of the course provided that: 1. The course has received prior approval of the Employee's department head and the City Manager. 2. The Employee attains a grade of"C" or better and is so certified to the City. 3. The Employee's attendance at course sessions is satisfactory. 4. No other reimbursement is claimed or applied for from another agency or source. All other non-related course work will be reimbursed at rate of 50%, with an annual cap of$500. ARTICLE 27. Training. The City will provide training to meet Post Board Certification standards and will pay for ongoing Post Board licenses required of each sergeant. 14 ARTICLE 28. Salaries and Benefits Salary Effective January 1, 2014, monthly wage rates are as follows: Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 2014 $6901.76 $7177.82 $7464.93 Effective January 1, 2015, monthly wage rates are as follows: Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 2015 $7074.30 $7357.26 $7651.55 Step increases normally occur on the date of the employee's service anniversary in accordance with established city policies. Sergeants appointed prior to January 1, 2009 shall be placed at Step 4 upon achieving their one year anniversary. Insurance For those employees holding a position within the unit prior to May 1, 2011, an amount equivalent to 2% of the base salary will be provided on a monthly basis to the employee to purchase insurance. In the event the City re-instates this benefit to non-union management employees, the employees in the unit will receive the same equivalent benefit on the same effective date as the non-union management employees. Insurance must be purchased through an approved City vendor and must be an approved City plan. When available, dental insurance will be offered with the cost of the premiums being paid for out of the City contribution toward benefits and/or by Employee contribution, whichever the Employee chooses. If the City expands the flexibility of the use of this benefit to other supervisors, the same flexibility will be extended to Employees covered by this agreement. Buyback of Accrued Time The City will buy back accrued time paid at a straight hourly rate on a quarterly basis. Sergeants will, if they so choose, be allowed to carry over (20) accrued hours into the next quarter. Health Insurance The City will contribute $1147 per month in 2014 for health insurance. Insurance must be purchased from City approved vendor and by a City authorized plan. For 15 2014 the City insurance contribution shall include $20 per month for those who successfully participated in the wellness initiative in 2013. The City will contribute the same dollar amount per month in 2015 for health insurance equal to that provided to all other Golden Valley employees, including $20 per month for those who successfully participate in the wellness initiative in 2014. Disability Insurance The City will provide Long Term Disability Insurance to the employees. Uniforms City will provide uniforms and equipment. Employees in any of the enumerated non-uniformed positions shall receive $650.89 annually in 2014 for clothing. That rate will be adjusted each year hereafter by the October-to-October Midwest Region CPI-U of the Consumer Price Index/Apparel Index. ARTICLE 29. Overtime Pay. Section 1. Overtime shall be worked only at the specific authorization of the Employee's supervisor. Hours reimbursed at the overtime rate shall include callbacks and schedule extensions. These hours shall be compensated at one and one-half times the employee's base rate of pay for hours worked beyond the Employee's regularly scheduled work shift. Changes in shifts do not qualify the Employee for overtime. For the purpose of computing overtime compensation, overtime hours worked shall not by pyramided, compounded or paid twice. Overtime shall be calculated to the nearest 1/10 of an hour. Section 2. Employees earning overtime shall, at the end of each payroll period inform their supervisor whether they wish to take the hours in pay, or time off (referred hereto as accrued time); and shall receive one and one-half(1 1/2) hours off for each overtime hour worked and hour for hour for straight time worked. Accrued time shall be taken in the same manner as vacation time, or reimbursed as provided in this Agreement. ARTICLE 30. Call Back. An employee called back to work outside of their regularly scheduled shift shall be paid for a minimum of three (3) hours at 1.5 times their regular base rate of pay. However, nothing in this Section shall be construed to prevent a supervisor from requiring an Employee to report early to their shift which shall be compensated at straight time provided that the total hours worked on the early report do not exceed that which is scheduled normally. Call back starts from receipt of order to return. 16 ARTICLE 31. Duration. The term of this Agreement shall be from January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2015. GOLDEN VALLEY POLICE CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY SERGEANTS, LOCAL 304 James Roberts, President/Treasurer Shepard M. Harris, Mayor Adam Burnside, Business Agent (LELS) Thomas D. Burt, City Manager 17 city 0 -1 11!11 Ar gotaen MEMORANDUM valley Park and Recreation Department 763-512-2345/763-512-2344(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting October 7, 2014 Agenda Item 3. I. Adopt Resolution Accepting Donations on behalf of the City Prepared By Rick Birno, Director of Parks & Recreation Summary As adopted in the Donation/Gift Policy, a gift of real or personal property must be accepted by the City Council by resolution and be approved by a two-thirds majority of the Council. A cash donation must be acknowledged and accepted by motion with a simple majority. We have prepared the attached resolution detailing various donors and their gifts for your consideration. Attachments • Resolution Accepting Donations on behalf of the City of Golden Valley (1 page) Recommended Action Motion to adopt Resolution Accepting Donations on behalf of the City of Golden Valley. Resolution 14-78 October 7, 2014 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution 04-20 on March 16, 2004 which established a policy for the receipt of gifts; and WHEREAS, the Resolution states that a gift of real or personal property must be accepted by the City Council by resolution and be approved by a two-thirds majority of the Council. A cash donation must be acknowledged and accepted by motion with a simple majority. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council accepts the following grants and donations on behalf of its citizens: $3,007.00 from Twin City Tennis Camps, Inc. for tennis Court Windscreens. $1,500.00 from United States Tennis Association for Quick Start Tennis Grant program. $750.00 from United States Tennis Association Northern for Quick Start Tennis Grant program. Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by the City Clerk. city 0 �Vllr golden .. ... MEMORANDUM valle y Park and Recreation Department 763-512-2345/763-512-2344(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting October 7, 2014 Agenda Item 3. J. Authorization for Submittal of Application for Hennepin Youth Sports Program Prepared By Rick Birno, Director of Parks and Recreation Summary Applications for the Hennepin Youth Sports Program Grant are currently being accepted for the 2015 grant cycle. Staff has discussed possible projects and recommends proceeding with applying for funds to improve the parking access, baseball and soccer fields at Sandburg Learning Center. Sandburg Learning Center is located at 2400 Sandburg Lane. City staff is in support of the collaborative efforts to upgrade the facility. The resolution, approving a grant submission, outlines a proposal to improve access from the west parking lot, improve the baseball fields and improve the soccer fields. The grant request will be for $325,000 from Hennepin County, with additional funds and staff management/labor in the amount of $395,500. Project match funding is as follows: City of Golden Valley: $234,500 (purchase and demo of adjoining property for project area -completed 2014) $110,000 (city staff project management and labor) $12,000 (asphalt and fence funds from 2015 CIP) Park Valley Soccer Association: $34,000 (project fiscal commitment/one-time payment) Armstrong- Cooper Youth Baseball Association: $5,000 (project fiscal commitment/one-time payment) Robbinsdale School District#281 has been involved in the project review and supports the recommended improvements. The City of Golden Valley and Independent School District#281 have a Joint Powers Agreement in place for use of the Sandburg Learning Center property. Attachments • Resolution Authorizing Submittal of Application for Hennepin Youth Sports Program Grant (1 page) Recommended Action Motion to adopt Resolution Authorizing Submittal of Application for Hennepin Youth Sports Program Grant. Resolution 14-79 October 7, 2014 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SUBMITTAL OF APPLICATION FOR HENNEPIN YOUTH SPORTS PROGRAM GRANT WHEREAS, Hennepin County, via its Youth Sports Grant Program, provides for capital funds to assist local government units of Hennepin County for the deveopment of sports or recreation facilities; and WHEREAS, the City of Golden Valley desires to make improvements at Sandburg Learning Center to improve access from the parking lot and improve the baseball and soccer fields. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Golden Valley: 1. The estimate of the total cost of the proposed improvements at Sandburg Learning Center is $720,500 and the City of Golden Valley is requesting $325,000 from the Hennepin County Youth Sports Grant Program and will assume responsibility in a partnership with ISD #281, Park Valley Soccer Association and the Armstrong-Cooper Youth Baseball Association for a match requirement of$395,500. 2. The City of Golden Valley agrees to be the fiscal agent and manage project, assume one hundred (100) percent of operation costs for the facility improvements, and will operate and maintain the outdoor athletic facilities for their intended purpose and functional life. 3. The City of Golden Valley agrees to enter into necessary and required agreements with Hennepin County for the specific purpose of constructing a recreational facility and long-term program direction. 4. That the City Manager and/or Director of Parks and Recreation is authorized and directed to execute said application and serve as official liaison with Hennepin County or its authorized representative. Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by the City Clerk. city 0fVk gotaenlvv�r MEMORANDUM valley Planning Department 763-593-8095/763-593-8109(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting October 7, 2014 Agenda Item 4. A. Continued Public Hearing- Ordinance No. 527- Rezoning 305 and 345 Pennsylvania Avenue South, Lake West Development, LLC, Applicant Prepared By Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager Summary The Applicant, Lake West Development, LLC, intends to construct 27 detached townhome units across 3.3 acres as part of a Planned Unit Development (PUD) located at 305 and 345 Pennsylvania Avenue South. In order for the Preliminary Design Plan to be considered,the Council must first consider amendments to both the General Land Use Plan Map and the Zoning Map. Without these amendments, the proposed use would not be consistent with the guiding or zoning of the properties. The Planning Commission reviewed the proposal at its July 14 and July 28 meetings and recommended approval. The City Council held a public hearing at its August 19 meeting and has since tabled this item to October 7. Zoning Map Amendment The property at 305 Pennsylvania Avenue South is currently zoned Single Family Residential (R-1), which provides for single family dwellings on lots of 10,000 square feet with 80 feet of width at the minimum front setback line. The property at 345 Pennsylvania Avenue South is currently zoned 1- 394 Mixed use, which requires a mix of uses (residential, commercial, office, other) on the site. Under the current proposal,the Zoning Map would be amended so that both of the properties would be zoned as Medium Density Residential (R-3), which provides for medium density housing of up to 10 units per acre. Based on the density of the proposed PUD of 8.2 units per acre, Medium Density Residential zoning would be the most appropriate designation for the two properties. The PUD process will allow for greater flexibility in designing the site layout and accommodating various setbacks. Recommendation In order to be consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan, the City waited to act on this item until the Metropolitan Council approved the recent Comprehensive Plan amendment reguiding these properties to Medium-Low Density Residential. The Metropolitan Council has now approved the Comprehensive Plan amendment allowing the Rezoning application to proceed. Attachments • Ordinance#527, Rezoning 305 and 345 Pennsylvania Avenue South from Single Family Residential and 1-394 Mixed Use to Medium Density Residential (2 pages) Recommended Action Motion to adopt Ordinance No. 527, Rezoning 305 and 345 Pennsylvania Avenue South from Single Family Residential (R-1) and 1-394 Mixed Use to Medium Density Residential (R-3), Lake West Development, LLC, Applicant. ORDINANCE NO. 527, 2ND SERIES AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE Rezoning 305 and 345 Pennsylvania Avenue South from Single Family Residential (R-1) and 1-394 Mixed Use to Medium Density Residential (R-3) Lake West Development LLC, Applicant The City Council for the City of Golden Valley hereby ordains as follows: Section 1. City Code Chapter 11 entitled "Land Use Regulations (Zoning)" is amended in Section 11.10, Subd. 2, by changing the zoning designation of certain tracts of land from Single Family Residential (R-1) and 1-394 Mixed Use to Medium Density Residential (R-3). Section 2. The tracts of land affected by this ordinance are legally described as: Parcel A: That part of the NE '/4 of the NW '/4 of Section 5, Township 117 Range 21 Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at a point on the East Line of said NE '/4 of the NW '/4 distant 778.58 feet South of the NE corner thereof; thence West parallel with the North line of said NE '/4 of the NW 1/4 to its intersection with a line drawn parallel with and distant 250.3 feet East of the West line of said NE '/4 of the NW '/4 as measured along a line parallel with the North line of said NE '/4 of the NW '/4, said point being the actual point of beginning of the tract to be described; thence North parallel with the West line of the NE '/4 of the NW '/4 a distance of 84.72 feet; thence West parallel with the North line of said NE '/4 of the NW '/4 a distance of 250.3 feet to the West line of said Quarter-Quarter; thence South along the West line of said Quarter-Quarter a distance of 407.915 feet; thence East parallel with the North line of said Quarter-Quarter a distance of 250.3 feet; thence North Parallel with the West line of said Quarter-Quarter a distance of 323.195 feet to the actual point of beginning. Except the Westerly 30 feet thereof, according to the United States Government Survey thereof and situated in Hennepin County, Minnesota. Parcel B: That part of the NE '/4 of the NW '/4 of Section 5, Township 117 Range 21 Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at a point on the East Line of said NE '/4 of the NW 1/4, distant 778.58 feet South of the NE corner thereof; thence West parallel with the North line of said NE '/4 of the NW 1/4 to its intersection with a line drawn parallel with and distant 250.3 feet East of the West line of the NE '/4 of the NW '/4 as measured along a line parallel with the North line of said NE '/4 of the NW '/4; thence South parallel with said West line of the NE '/4 of the NW '/4 a distance of 323.195 to the actual point of beginning of the land to be herein described; thence South on said parallel line 199.10 feet, more or less, to the South line of said NE '/4 of the NW 1/4; thence West along said South line to the West line of said NE '/4 of the NW 1/4; thence North along said West line to its intersection with a line drawn parallel with the North line of the NE '/4 of the NW '/4 from the actual point of beginning, thence East to the actual point of beginning. Except the Westerly 30 feet and the Southerly 50 feet thereof, according to the United States Government Survey thereof and situated in Hennepin County, Minnesota Parcel C: The West 250.3 feet of the South 100.0 feet of the North 693.86 feet of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter. Except the Westerly 30 feet thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Section 3. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99 entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 4. This ordinance shall take effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law. Adopted by the City Council this 7th day of October, 2014. /s/Shepard M. Harris Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: /s/Kristine A. Luedke Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk city O MEMORANDUMgotae. .. -. -. I!V^� vHey Planning Department 763-593-8095 1763-593-8109 (fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting October 7, 2014 Agenda Item 4. B. Public Hearing- Preliminary Plat Approval - Sunnyridge Woods - 200 Meadow Lane North Prepared By Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager Summary At the September 8, 2014, Planning Commission meeting, the Commission voted 5-1 to recommend approval of a minor subdivision of the property located at 200 Meadow Lane North (Sunnyridge Woods). The proposal would create three lots from the existing lot, each meeting the necessary lot area and lot width requirements as outlined in Chapter 12 of the City Code. The existing home would be demolished. During the discussion, the Applicant offered to adjust the west property line of Lot 3, shifting it 5 feet to the west, in order to respond to concerns from neighbors and provide more distance between the proposed home on Lot 3 and the existing home at 207 Sunnyridge Lane. The Planning Commission included this modification as a condition of approval. Attachments • Location Map (1 page) • Planning Commission Minutes dated September 8, 2014 (6 pages) • Memo to the Planning Commission dated September 8, 2014 (3 pages) • Memo from City Engineer Jeff Oliver, dated September 2, 2014 (3 pages) • Memo from City Attorney Allen Barnard, dated September 22, 2014 (2 pages) • Photo Rendering of property (1 page) • Site Plans (6 pages) Recommended Action Motion to approve the Preliminary Plat for Sunnyridge Woods, 200 Meadow Lane North, subject to the following conditions: 1. The west property line of Lot 3 shall be moved 5 feet to the west as proposed by the Applicant. 2. The City Attorney will determine if a title review is necessary prior to approval of the final plat. 3. A park dedication fee of$4,448.80 shall be paid before final plat approval. 4. The City Engineer's memorandum, dated September 2, 2014, shall become part of this approval. 5. All applicable City permits shall be obtained prior to the development of the new lots. 301 i 4216 4212 4200 4124 4112 1303 4015 303 1309 316 \ 243 300 I � [!�I 3910 J � 1 235 Poplar Dr - 1 250 A 227 222 l Subject Property. 240 234 3901 / 219 200 Meadow Ln N �� 220 200 215 220 3 221 209 211 235 219 207 214 166 212 127 200 205 y 1210 124 165 201 Z' 185 _ 204 206 208 115 112 145 L' 200 m. -- g 101 4140 120 4007 4004 100 4120 125 '.yk• a`: ` 4135 4020 4010 4008 25;_ 24 105 4006 22 4125 0 Roanoke Cir 20 <n 4240 4025 4015 ,. 4013 4011 4009 17 4270 V 4115 �5V� 8 u _ 9 4000 12 e vt4. 4300 • • 1 - 40X4012 3940 3920 3902 `a JUL, Glenwood Ave 4333 4313 4309 4301 - { 7_�- 4263 • � 9 8 f 9 3901 !� f I- Regular Meeting of the Golden Valley Planning Commission September 8, 2014 A regular meeting of the Planning Co ission was held at the Golden Valley City Hall, C%uncil Chambers, 7800 Golden Vall Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota, on Monday, Septe er 8, 2014. Chair Kluchka cal ed the meeting to order at 7 p Those present we lanning Commi ioners Baker, BI , era, Kluchka, Segelbaum and Waldhauser. Also ent was PI nning Man Jason Zimmerman and Administrative Assistant Lis ittma 1. Approval of Minutes August 25, 2014, R ar Pla ning Com ' sion Meeting Waldhauser referr o the fourth p agraph on page thre nd asked that it be clarified to state that thObject property cle rly starts with two paralle ' e yard lot lines that eventually b d creating a side yar and a rear yard, whereas the s lot lines on a pie shaped I would intersect at a shar angle. M ED by Waldhauser, seconded y Segelbaum and motion carried unanimously to prove the August 25, 2014, minut s with the above noted clarification. 2. Informal Public Hearing — Minor Subdivision — 200 Meadow Lane North — Sunnyridge Woods — SU08-12 Applicant: Golden Valley Land Company (Matt Pavek) Address: 200 Meadow Lane North Purpose: To reconfigure the existing single family residential lot into three new single family residential lots. Zimmerman referred to a site plan and explained the applicant's request to demolish the existing single family home and subdivide the property into three new single family residential lots, all of which meet the requirements found in City Code. He stated that the applicant has had two neighborhood meetings and that the neighbor's concerns included: the loss of trees, the size of the lots, the impact of the construction, the impact on the character of the neighborhood, and the impact on surrounding home values. Kluchka asked if there is any component of this proposal that would allow it to be denied. Zimmerman stated that it meets all of the requirements in the City Code so there is really no reason to deny the requested subdivision. Segelbaum asked if the applicant is requesting any variances. Zimmerman said no. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission September 8, 2014 Page 2 Peter Knaeble, representing the applicant, stated that the main concern he heard at the neighborhood meetings was regarding the density of his proposal. He stated that based on economic feasibility he can't split the property into two lots instead of three. He said he also heard concerns about the relationship of the home on proposed Lot 3 to the neighbor immediately to the east at 207 Sunnyridge Lane. He said he would like to propose that Lot 3 be widened by five feet and be allowed to have variances in order to have a 10 foot west side yard setback (instead of 15 feet), and an east side yard setback of 20 feet (instead of 15 feet) so that the new home can be built further away from the existing home at 207 Sunnyridge Lane. He discussed the tree preservation requirements and stated that the majority of the trees on the property would remain. However, because of the neighbor's concerns, he would like to propose a tree conservation easement along Meadow Lane and Sunnyridge Lane to further protect an additional 34 trees. He referred to the neighbor's concerns about the impacts during construction and said he thinks any additional controls regarding noise, parking, working hours, etc. should be enforced at the time of construction. Kluchka questioned the procedure in light of the applicant's proposed new information. He questioned if the Planning Commission should wait to review the proposal until new plans are submitted for review. Zimmerman stated that staff has had some time to review the additional information so he doesn't think the process needs to be stopped. He noted that any variance requests would take place during the building permit process since the variances discussed would be from the Zoning Code requirements, not from the Subdivision Code requirements. He added that the proposed tree conservation easement would need more discussion. Cera stated that traditionally, a variance request coming back to the City after a subdivision request has been frowned upon. Kluchka said the neighbors want the house on Lot 3 moved further toward the west, and he doesn't want to second guess the applicant. Segelbaum asked Knaeble if these will be custom homes and if it is difficult at this point to say which trees will stay and which ones will not. Knaeble said they will be custom homes. He stated that he is required to submit a tree preservation plan with his application and that some additional trees will be removed and some will be saved. Segelbaum questioned if there are other ways, besides a tree conservation easement, to maintain additional trees. Kluchka asked if the applicant could put a covenant on the property regarding the trees. Knaeble said they are proposing an easement that would get filed at the County with the property. Waldhauser added that covenants usually have a fixed life. Baker questioned why they couldn't have a perpetual easement placed on the lot itself so it is attached to the deed and protected. Matt Pavek, Applicant, stated that he is proposing a perpetual easement, the trick is having someone enforce the easement language. Baker referred to the tree preservation plan and noted that virtually all the trees are in the street right-of-way, not on the lots themselves, so the proposed tree conservation easement won't be effective anyway. Pavek said there are trees on the lots and in the right-of-way. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission September 8, 2014 Page 3 Segelbaum asked Pavek if he has concerns that restrictions would make the lots more difficult to sell. Pavek said it has been his experience that people want to keep as many trees as possible, so having a tree conservation easement would be a win-win situation and a good faith effort to preserve some of the trees. Segelbaum suggested that the City Attorney might be able to suggest another way to protect the trees that would not require the City to have to enforce the easement. Kluchka noted that half of the trees are ash trees will probably be removed anyway. Kluchka referred to the proposed amendment to move the west property line of Lot 3 five feet further to the west and asked if that is the maximum amount it could be moved. Pavek stated that 5 feet is an approximate amount. He said language could be changed to say that the lot line could be shifted to the west, but still maintain the required lot size. Knaeble clarified that the plans they submitted are what they are proposing. He just heard from the neighbors that they would like that property line shifted to the west, so he is willing to do that. Baker asked Pavek to explain the economic reasons why he rejected proposing a two- lot split. Pavek explained that the price is set by how many lots can be created and that the seller in this case is entitled to split this property into three lots. If fewer than three lots are created it decreases the value of the land. Kluchka opened the public hearing. John Wetzel, 120 Meadow Lane North, thanked the applicant for listening to his concerns. He said he is very concerned about the tree coverage and it takes 50 to 100 years to have the kind of tree coverage they have now, which he would like to maintain. He said there will be an awful lot of activity on Sunnyridge Lane in the next 12 to 18 months. He referred to an aerial photo of the subject property and said he doesn't recognize it. He said he walks by this property every day when he walks his dog, and it doesn't look like what is being shown in the photo. He said that moving the center lot line further west makes sense and preserving trees makes sense. He asked if the 15- foot side yard setback is standard on all properties in Golden Valley. Kluchka said each property is different. Wetzel asked the Planning Commission to take into consideration what each neighbor is saying because once something starts, it steamrolls, and it is hard to stop. He said he loves where he lives, and he pays unbelievably high taxes because of the beauty of the neighborhood and the wonderful neighbors he has, and he would like to preserve that. Rick Moore, 214 Sunnyridge Lane, said he thinks the applicant is headed in the right direction and has been listening to the neighbors. He said typical setbacks are really set up for a typical rectangular lot that you might find in a grid situation where there is a front, two small sides and back. He said in the situation of pie shaped lots, there needs to be a different way to analyze these types of properties because there are side yards next to back yards. He said the discussion demands that these types of lots be looked at differently. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission September 8, 2014 Page 4 Mark Dietz, 207 Sunnyridge Lane, handed out pictures of his house, his back yard, and the trees on the subject property. He said he appreciates the time the applicant has spent with him and the neighbors. He said this proposal affects him a lot. He said he counted 52 trees on Lot 3, some of which are 85- to 125-feet tall Austrian pines, which are a protected species, and are 125 years old. The trees are a haven for wildlife, and protection for his house. He said he has 20 windows on his house that face the proposed Lot 3. He said he is trying to sell his house and realtors have told him it will be virtually impossible to sell with construction going on, without reducing the price by 15 to 20%. Michael Alexin, 208 Sunnyridge Circle, said the picture the applicants have shown is not drawn to scale and that the proposed new houses are really right on top of each other. He said he moved to this area because of the large lots and trees and this proposal is a tragedy that will ruin the character of the neighborhood. He said even though it meets all of the legal requirements, those requirements go across all of Golden Valley, and this is a very special neighborhood, and a special community in the City with a very high tax base. He said he really believes this should be a two lot development, and with bigger homes on them the economics can work. He said doesn't understand why they need the third lot because it will change the character of the neighborhood, and the homes will be very close together. Mark Dietz, 207 Sunnyridge Lane, referred to the pictures he submitted and noted that his patio goes all the way to the property line. He said there is a major concern that his house will look at the new house on Lot 3 so he suggests the proposed variance should be granted so the new house will be further away from his house. He stated that there are 2 or 3 pine trees that are 45 inches in diameter that will have to be removed which is disturbing. George Landis, 220 Meadow Lane North, said he'd like to offer an appeal for a two-lot subdivision. He said people come to his house and they can't believe there are any neighborhoods like this in the Twin Cities. He asked the Planning Commission if they want to be like Wayzata or Coon Rapids, and asked where they want this community to go. Seeing and hearing no one else wishing to comment, Kluchka closed the public hearing. Knaeble stated that the plans are drawn to scale. Baker asked Knaeble if the aerial photo he showed was an existing photo of the trees or if trees were added to the photo. Knaeble explained that the plan he showed is a color rendering layered over an accurate aerial photo, and that no trees were added to the photo. Kluchka asked Zimmerman to explain the side yard setback requirements. Zimmerman stated that side yard setbacks vary according to the width of the lot and the height of the house. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission September 8, 2014 Page 5 Waldhauser referred to the drainage on these properties and noted that there is going to be a catch basin along the north property line. She asked how that will work if there are trees in the easement area. Pavek said they will work with the City Engineer regarding the placement of that pipe. Kluchka referred to the comment regarding the methods used for odd lot sizes and stated that the City Council will be discussing some proposed changes. Zimmerman stated that the lot width language was addressed and the discussion regarding lot depth is ongoing. Segelbaum noted that any new language being considered wouldn't change the analysis of this proposal. Cera questioned if Austrian pines are a protected species. Baker said they are a viable species, but there is no special protection that he is aware of. He added that he is cognizant of the fact that the City Council will be discussing a moratorium on subdivisions at their next Council/Manager meeting, which he supports, so he is opposed to a motion approving this proposal. Cera noted that the City Council does not take action at their Council/Manager meetings. The Commissioners discussed tabling this proposal until the City Council debates a moratorium on subdivisions. Zimmerman stated that applications already received would continue to go through the process. Segelbaum stated that the applicant has presented a viable proposal. He said he is pleased that some changes were made based on neighborhood concerns, and he doesn't see any basis to deny this request. Blum agreed, and said that this is one of the most beautiful areas in the City, but understanding the law and the Planning Commission's responsibility, there is nothing proposed here to base a denial on. He added that the applicant could sue the City which would require the request be approved anyway, without the changes the neighbor's asked the applicant to consider. Kluchka said he thinks moving the interior lot line five feet to the west is a good idea that he would like to encourage. Cera said he would prefer that option over granting variances in the future. Segelbaum said he would like to leave the tree conservation easement question to the City Attorney. He said he thinks it would be better not to have the City be required to actively maintain that easement, and he does not want it to be added as a condition of approval. Cera suggested adding a condition stating that the easement could be one option, but that further study is necessary. Waldhauser said the proposed subdivision meets or exceeds all of the City's requirements. She said she is not opposed to moving the interior lot line five feet to the west, and she would endorse some sort of tree preservation arrangement. MOVED by Waldhauser, seconded by Cera and motion carried 5 to 1 to recommend approval of the Sunnyridge Woods Minor Subdivision subject to the following findings and conditions: Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission September 8, 2014 Page 6 Findings: 1. All three of the lots of the proposed subdivision meet the requirements of the R-1 Single Family Zoning District. 2. The City Engineer finds that the lots are buildable. 3. The addition of the new lots will not place an undue strain on City utility systems. Conditions: 1. The west property line of Lot 3 shall be moved 5 feet to the west as proposed by the applicant. 1. The City Attorney will determine if a title review is necessary prior to approval of the Final Plat. 2. A park dedication fee of$4,448.80 shall be paid before Final Plat approval. 3. The City Engineer's memorandum, dated September 2, 2014, shall become part of this approval. 4. All applicable City permits shall be obtained prior to the development of the new lots. The consensus of the Commission was that they have a preference for no future variances, and they would also like the City Attorney to examine ways to provide tree preservation similar to what the applicant has proposed. ort Recess-- 3. Reports on Meetings of the ousing and Redevelopment Authority, City ouncil, Board of Zoning A peals and other Meetings Kluchka rep ed on the last Com nity Center Task Force me g where the group narrowed thei ecommendation d n to two options. 4. Other Busin s • Council Liaison epo No report was given. Kluchka stated that has be do f talk on social media about the new Lock Up storage business under 'nstr ction ` t the corner of Highway 55 and Douglas. He asked how he would quest t at a pu `' 'c hearing being held to figure out how the City let this developm happen. aldhause said she recalls that there was an opportunity for the City Co cil to rezone 'hat property,","owever, the utility and access issues with this propert ould have bee very expensiv .for the City to address. Segelb m suggested that t `e Planning Commi ' ion review the uses permitted in the vario zoning districts. Bak `r said there needs to e some education done before the ne Comprehensive Plan u date process. Waldhau' r suggested articles be put in the SunPost and the City's new etter. city of 1611, olden MEMORANDUM valley, Planning Department 763-593-8095/763-593-8109(fax) Date: September 8, 2014 To: Golden Valley Planning Commission From: Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager Subject: Informal Public Hearing on Preliminary Plan for Minor Subdivision of 200 Meadow Lane North —Sunnyridge Woods—Golden Valley Land Company, Applicant Summary of Request Golden Valley Land Company, represented by Matt Pavek, is proposing to subdivide the property located at 200 Meadow Lane North into three separate lots. There is one existing single family home on this lot which would be demolished and replaced with three new single family homes. The existing lot is 38,091 square feet. City Code requires that each new lot be a minimum of 10,000 square feet in the R-1 Single Family Residential Zoning District. The proposed Lot 1, to the north, would be 11,200 square feet; Lot 2, to the south, would be 13,810 square feet; and Lot 3, to the east, would be 13,081 square feet. City Code also requires that each lot have a minimum of 80 feet of width at the front setback line. Lot 1 would have 80 feet of width, Lot 2 would have 100.2 feet of width, and Lot 3 would have 122.3 feet of width. The dimensions of all of the newly created lots provide a sufficient building envelope for development. Qualification as a Minor Subdivision The proposed three lot subdivision qualifies as a minor subdivision because the property located at 200 Meadow Lane North is an existing platted lot of record, the proposed subdivision will produce fewer than four lots, and it will not create need for public improvements. The Applicant has submitted the required information to the City that allows for the subdivision to be evaluated as a minor subdivision. Staff Review of Minor Subdivision Staff has evaluated the proposed lot subdivision request as a minor subdivision to create three lots in the R-1 Single Family Residential Zoning District. The Applicant has submitted a survey of the existing lot prior to the proposed subdivision, as well as a preliminary plat displaying the three lots after the subdivision. Lot 1 would have access off of Meadow Lane, the other two lots would have access off of Sunnyridge Lane. City Engineer Jeff Oliver has submitted a memorandum dated September 2, 2014, regarding recommendations from the Engineering Division concerning this request. Requirements set forth in Mr. Oliver's memo are to be included in the recommended action of this subdivision. Qualification Governing Approval as a Minor Subdivision According to Section 12.50 of the City's Subdivision Regulations, the following are the regulations governing approval of minor subdivisions with staff comments related to this request: 1. Minor subdivisions shall be denied if the proposed lots do not meet the requirements of the appropriate zoning district. All three of the lots of the proposed subdivision meet the requirements of the R-1 Single Family Zoning District. 2. A minor subdivision may be denied if the City Engineer determines that the lots are not buildable. The City Engineer finds that the lots are buildable. 3. A minor subdivision may be denied if there are no sewer and water connections available or if it is determined by the City Engineer that an undue strain will be placed on City utility systems by the addition of the new lots. The addition of the new lots will not place an undue strain on City utility systems. 4. Approval of the minor subdivision may require the granting of certain easements to the City. As discussed in the Engineering memo, new utility easements must be dedicated and shown on the Final Plat. 5. If public agencies other than the City have jurisdiction of the streets adjacent to the minor subdivision, the agencies will be given the opportunities to comment. No other public agencies have jurisdiction over the streets adjacent to the site. 6. The City may ask for review of title if required by the City Attorney for dedication of certain easements. The City Attorney will determine if such a title review is necessary prior to approval of the Final Plat. 7. The minor subdivision may be subject to park dedication requirements. A park dedication fee of $4,448.80 (2% of the estimated land value with credit for one unit) is required for this subdivision. 8. The conditions spelled out shall provide the only basis for denial of a minor subdivision. Approval will be granted to any application that meets the established conditions. All conditions have been met. Recommended Action Staff recommends approval of the proposed minor subdivision subject to the following conditions: 1. The City Attorney will determine if a title review is necessary prior to approval of the Final Plat. 2. A park dedication fee of$4,448.80 shall be paid before Final Plat approval. 3. The City Engineer's memorandum, dated September 2, 2014, shall become part of this approval. 4. All applicable City permits shall be obtained prior to the development of the new lots. Attachments: Location Map (1 page) Memo from Public Works Department, dated September 2, 2014 (3 pages) Site Plans (6 pages) cityf goldeni!4-. #vw� MEMORANDUM 1 1 Public Works Department 763-593-8030/763-593-3988(fax) Date: September 2, 2014 To: son Zimmerman, City Planner From: Jeff Oliver, PE, City Engineer Eric Eckman, Public Works Viarist ?'e Subject: Subdivision Review for Sunnyridge Woods Engineering staff has reviewed the plans for a proposed minor subdivision of property located at 200 Meadow Lane North. The Developer proposes to demolish the existing home and subdivide the parcel into three single-family lots. The comments contained in this review are based upon plans submitted to the City on August 7, 2014. Engineering staff recommends approval of the proposed minor subdivision of property located at 200 Meadow Lane North, called Sunnyridge Woods, subject to the following comments: 1. The existing lot is part of the recorded plat known as Sunnyridge Addition which did not include the dedication of public easements. The final plat for this development must include the dedication of new easements, consistent with the City's Subdivision Ordinance. This includes the following: a. 10-foot drainage and utility easements along all plat boundaries. b. 12-foot drainage and utility easements centered on interior lot lines. c. 15-foot drainage and utility easement along north plat boundary to accommodate the proposed storm sewer system. 2. A City demolition permit, stormwater management permit, and utility permits are required for the demolition of the existing home. 3. A City Right-of-Way Management permit is required for each parcel for the proposed excavations and obstructions in public right-of-way that are specific to each parcel. a. The proposed Lot 2 will utilize the existing concrete driveway apron. Lots 1 and 3 will require the construction of new driveway aprons which must meet the City's standard and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. G:\Developments-Private\Sunnyridge Woods\Subdivision Review_sunnyridge woods.doa b. The construction of the driveway for Lot 1 will impact the City's existing sidewalk on Meadow Lane and therefore portions of the sidewalk must be removed and replaced in compliance with City standards and ADA requirements. Details regarding the driveway and sidewalk construction will be further refined at the time of permitting. 4. The Developer has shown on the plans that utilities can be extended to serve the proposed dwellings. Staff has the following comments regarding the proposed utility construction: a. Lot 1 will reuse an existing sewer service stub and will require the construction of a new water service in Meadow Lane. Staff recommends that the Developer explore constructing a new sanitary sewer service parallel to the new water service for several reasons (staff has discussed this with the Developer and the Developer is looking into this further). Staff also recommends that the Developer or Contractor directional bore the water and sewer services to Lot 1, if feasible, to minimize impacts to traffic and the street pavement on Meadow Lane North. b. Lot 2 will reuse the existing water and sewer services which currently serve 200 Meadow Lane. c. Lot 3 will utilize an existing sewer service stub and proposes to construct a new water service in Sunnyridge Lane. The pavement on Sunnyridge will be excavated to construct the water service. d. A Right-of-Way Permit is required for all excavations and obstructions within City right-of-way. The Developer or Contractor will also be required to obtain the appropriate sewer and water permits from the City for the removal, rehabilitation, or installation of utility services. e. The Developer is proposing the construction of a 12-inch HDPE storm sewer along the north boundary of the development to drain a low area of the property. Due to the lack of easements on the property immediately north, the storm sewer must be relocated south so it is centered within the proposed 15-foot drainage and utility easement. The storm sewer must be constructed of reinforced concrete pipe, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. The final design and location of the pipe and structures will be determined at the time of permitting. The storm sewer will be constructed by the Developer and will be owned and maintained by the City. Therefore, a letter of credit or cash security will be required for the public improvement as a guarantee that the storm sewer will be constructed in a timely manner and in accordance with City standards. 5. Sanitary Sewer Inflow and Infiltration (1/1) Reduction a. The existing sanitary sewer service to 200 Meadow Lane North is in the process of being inspected for compliance with the 1/1 ordinance. Depending on the results of the inspection, the Developer may need to enter into an 1/1 Deposit Agreement with the City guaranteeing that the service is removed/repaired/rehabilitated to comply with the 1/1 ordinance. G:\Developments-Private\Sunnyridge Woods\Subdivision Review_sunnyridge woods.docx 2 b. The three new parcels must obtain compliance with the City's Inflow and Infiltration Ordinance, prior to occupancy of the homes. 6. A preliminary grading plan was submitted by the Developer. The new lots will be custom- graded at the time of home construction, and therefore a City Stormwater Management Permit will be required before the start of construction of each home. A stormwater management plan that meets City standards is required as part of each permit submittal. The Developer and its Contractors must ensure that stormwater runoff in the north portion of the development is accommodated within the property and directed to the proposed storm sewer to the extent feasible. 7. This development is subject to the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance and a preliminary tree preservation plan was submitted by the Developer. Because each lot will be custom- graded, a separate Tree Preservation Permit will be required for each lot prior to the start of home construction. The City Forester will review the tree inventory, tabulations, and plans in more detail at the time of permitting. 8. There is a deferred assessment of$3,250 for the reconstruction of streets adjacent to this property as part of the City's 2002 Pavement Management Program. 9. The developer and/or contractor must obtain the appropriate permits prior to development. Approval of this minor subdivision is also subject to the review and comment of the City Attorney and other City staff. Please feel free to call me if you have any questions regarding this matter. C: Tom Burt, City Manager Chantell Knauss, Assistant City Manager/Interim Physical Development Director John Crelly, Fire Chief Eric Seaburg, Engineer Kelley Janes, Utility Maintenance Supervisor Jerry Frevel, Building Official Sue Virnig, Director of Finance G:\Developments-Private\Sunnyridge Woods\Subdivision Review_sunnyridge woods.docx 3 Allen D.Barnard BEST&FLANAGAN LLP Attorney DIRECT 612.341.9715 225 South Sixth Street,Suite 4000 Minneapolis,Minnesota 55402 abarnrard@bestlaw.com TEL 612.339.7121 FAX 612.339.5897 BESTLAW.COM BEST & FLANAGAN Memorandum DATE: September 22, 2014 TO: Golden Valley City Council and City Manager FROM: City Attorney SUBJECT: Application Review During Moratorium This memorandum summarizes what state law and city ordinances say about reviewing subdivision and PUD applications during the recently enacted 6 month moratorium. Statutory Authority for Moratorium Under state law, Golden Valley has the authority to enact an "interim" or temporary ordinance that "regulates, restricts, or prohibits any use, development, or subdivision" within the City for up to one year. Minn. Stat. 5462.355, subd. 4(a). During this time, the City must conduct a study or hearing to consider changes to the City's subdivision, zoning and/or Comp Plan regulations. Moratorium's Scope and Time The moratorium passed by City Council on September 16 precludes the City from reviewing or approving any new subdivision or PUD application filed after the effective date of the moratorium that has a "single family residential component". The moratorium lasts for 6 months, during which the City is to study the issues highlighted in the moratorium, and make any changes to the zoning and subdivision regulations warranted by the conclusions of the study. Limits on Moratorium—Applications in the Pipeline Subdivision Applications with Preliminary Approvals. Under state law, a moratorium cannot "halt, delay or impede a subdivision that has been given preliminary approval." Minn. Stat. 5462.355, subd. 4(c). The regulations that are in effect at the time the application was preliminarily approved applies to the review of the final plat. Minn. Stat. 5462.358, subd. 3(c). All Applications Submitted Before Moratorium. Under state law, a moratorium does not stop the 60/120 day clock on applications filed before the effective date of the moratorium. Minn. Stat. 5462.355, subd. 4(c). This means that the City should act on all applications in the pipeline within the time limits set by state law or risk having those applications automatically approved under the state's 60/120 day rule. Minn. Stat. 515.99. Review Standards. Subdivisions must be approved if they meet the conditions of approval in the subdivision ordinance. In addition, Golden Valley's ordinance makes it clear that the conditions spelled out in the subdivision ordinance "provide the only basis for denial" of a minor subdivision, and that "approval will be granted to any application that meets the established conditions." City Code 5 12.50, sudb. 3.1. With PUDs, Council has more discretion, and can deny PUDs if there is any rational basis for the denial under the applicable PUD standards in City Code. City Code 511.55. 000090/480568/19471431 c 'S"''tT y � t �s�• r ♦ � '!fix � / i e1 e fi o- 4"•iI� 'gig a �'+� '��,. �. �5 „ •�� op x t k ++� • L i ! OV ..tri t t « 4 A ► _° ,1% 4 A 4931 W.35TH ST.SUITE 2W ST.LOUISPARK,MN 55416 c"IsftG—p ccm Melt Pavut Pat Serve" SUNNYRIDGE WOODS Iti!-11}394,.! Y^L-LSU-lUIU GOLDEN VALLEY, MINNESOTA SHEET INDEX cN z N SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE Lo Q C-0.0 TITLE SHEET U) ISSUED ■ C-1.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN/SURVEY v, a Z C-2.0 PRELIMINARY PLAT,SITE PLAN 0 LU 0 ,: PRELIMINARY PLAT C-3A PRELIMINARY TREE REEPRESERADING > w C-4.0 PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN O Q U _J . C-5.0 PRELIMINARY TREE PRESERVATION PLAN � Q Q w Z w CITY SUBMITTAL0 0 J s 2 1 Q I=— W O J w Z J a Lu o `'-illl p.Ve :_. ,. DEVELOPER: MASTER LEGEND: Z g > O t?' GOLDEN VALLEY LAND COMPANY ______934 ________ EX.2'CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL Z 6001 GLENWOOD AVE Q Z GOLDEN VALLEY,MN 55422 :." EXISTING SPOT GRADE ELEVATION D' Q LLI w 419 Y V^PROPOSED 2'CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL I w 0 L9 Ll SP OT GRADE ELEVATION(GUTTERIFLOW LINE oO 0 O `may UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) O to N PROPERTY OWNER: '^ 422aBCl4—TC SPOT GRADE ELEVATION BACK OF CURB OF v CURB) [O L. M JOHN MURRAY IRO 200 MEADOW LANE NORTH 4zz.onv SPOT GRADE ELEVATION TOP OF 11VALL w GOLDEN VALLEY,MN 55422 422 pew SPOT GRADE ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WALL a DRAINAGEARROW a EMERGENCY OVERFLOW I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN. EOF SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT'i WAS SITE LOCATION ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY GRECT N ---------i-----' SILT FENCE IGRAowG LIMIT SUPERVISION M'D THATI AM A DULY SITE LOCATION MAP CIVIL SITE GROUP ---- uCt=EO-tturts QN&I,CANttR 4931 W 35TH STREET , i INLET PROTECTION UNCER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF SUITE 3-3 TH ST LOUIS PARK,MN 55416 STABLIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 783-213-3914 OEM { SOIL BORING LOCATION Milffiew R.Pavek Z SURVEYOR: pAT[&T-ta -E—No 4443 RENDER 6 ASSOCIATES INC. — CURB AND GU-TER(T.0=TIP OUT) -----�,¢------ ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY 3440 FEDERAL DRIVE SUITE 110 PROPOSED MANHOLE STORM DATE DESCRIPTION EAGAN,MN 55122 a-sa P IMINARY FLAT SIIeMITiAL (651)452-5051 PROPOSED CATCH BASIN OR CATCH BASIN MANHOLE STORM PROPOSED GATE VALVE WETLAND DELINEATOR: PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT NIA QQ PROPOSED MANHOLE SANITARY PROPOSEOSIGN —►—�— PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER --M--�1�— PROPOSED STORM SEWER —i—�— PROPOSED WATER MAIN REVISION SUMMARY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER: EXISTING SANITARY SEWER DATE DESCRIPn C'J TBD EXISTING STORM SEWER �'—i— EXISTING WATER MAIN —c G EXISTING GAS MAIN --E E EXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC —cc EXISTING UNDERGROUND CABLE A I Ir. fi TITLE SHEET 0 EXISTING MANHOLE E EXISTING ELECTRIC BOX ❑ EXISTING CATCH BASIN -3" EXISTING LIGHT qg EXISTINGHYDRANT Q EXISTING GAS METER o EXISTING STOPBOX w EXISTING GAS VALVE (^_�.O H EXISTING GATE VALVE v Boundary and Topographic Survey for: GOLDEN VALLEY LAND COMPANY 200 Meadow Lane North — Golden Valley, Minnesota CIO NOTES Y 6' Uij Uallties shown are from Information furnished by the CRY of Golden a" ., Valley. (20x0.00 SUNNYRIDGE) Spuce\\ �, �� ^1 r' ' *Contact Gopher Siete 1 for utility locations before any conatrurtlon — $89°33'I7"E r 199.77 shall begin. Phone 651-454-0002. 95n H\I ,�• I - _ I I � q-4 Area=38,092 s9uare feet(0.67 acre). sh` A ! . L � Ash I � As ` ` ��4'- *Zoning: R-1(Single Pemlly Residential).I' ar \Zh �-.J Ap A nh \ `3s � ' *Zoning Information obtained from the City of Golden Valley Web Site. Asn ` Mh Spur 15 / 3' " Ash12' �• / / //'! Em h EIm 1 LU la• 0 wootl\`. ` _.__854__________ Sp Ce , q6, / `1 Ash/ N ( Pine -} {/ hb / {),[,}, 44 01 �N LEGEND AsnPrne / < • Imn Monument Found pi- / n, \ o Iron Monument Set 956 \ - _—.___ SPvca !�._�-%� '6sn�[ /Pine /10- \ �^;; -_ -85E �- ` ` / /�/ Ash —S—Sanitary Sewer MH Y l / /1/0" I�„ \ —sT—Storm Sewer .. �. Pix.✓ `\ [� Top 856.1 Asn - +�\ �� / 1 / � � Pine 1 a\' —W—Watermaln 12- 5\0� —-�•\\ `_ // �Pine� / V ZN4 Gv• Gate valve Tap 668.61 , Cedar �� / CK �,\ / Eim '1 MHC) Manhole 36 MH L i DEArSp ee O eats+eaein Mr.85219 ("'� jq..• � / �Y , FunwuuA/ \ h " iYd. cy �� PPO Concrete to CS ConcrSurface ,� D(ISTING \ '\ z4" / � Bituminous Surface ECK SpuMHHOUSE m Electrical Transform er Top r 859.49 TVC Cable TV Pedestal /As.hh A14'0 �Ql Aeh UP v I cAna" \ 4" 1 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION J/ esn '114 P^� \�es� i � 0��• )Er9m /g Lot 6,SUNNYRIDGE,according to the recorded plat thereof,Hernepin County,Minnesota. I r / N89° '4OW 80.90 re rooQ°tr f 859 rop 859.07 I ( ema IF ce Jr., I ` Waima Ash,. - L / i hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or under my direction and that I ' C -W Top / � 17 fop B 869 b4- 52-- M. f4 CB am a duty Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. , a59 15 z MH t`' SUNNYRIDGE 1T-Sv .•,../ / Dated this 29th day of July,2014 Top 857.51 .�,'[s'�,'-,.R• T REHDER&ASSOCIATES,INC. REVISION SUMMARY 1 lap 857.42^ - --' �� GATE DESCRIPTION 111 +ry• Im.65117 CB ` To 83737 MM Thomas J.Ada*,Land Surveyor MlnnesoW License No.434I4 Iy EXISTING CONDITIONS ! I 60 I C 1 .0 0 10 20 40 BO Scale in Feet Rehder and Associates, Inc. CIVIL ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS 3440 Federai DrIo• Sufte 110 • Eoto%Minneaotu •Phone(651)452-5051 JOB: 144-2724.012 i ZZ499 NW',011VA N30109 3nN3AV 000MN319 1009 G>p ¢z O s� ANVdWOO UNVI J131��d/� N30-100 W N hiegi<`€a a � N o Q �o= � ZZ499 NW'.l3llVA N30109'Hi2JON 3NV1 MOOV3W OOZ L&W ; o r , v F� nIlk, >C � � fl uml d cc a m wap '4 Sa00M 3001?1JlNNf1S `wy = �b . z - w t q i y Y S 0 3 z p o w j _ 7 a 2 O 4 a @I i-J U ti j w o O p N La K LL N z u�l V 0 0 xF x = c o 0 0 0 .w. J w �V \\ Jz �/� W U O'q' N (nZ Z w U W O Cd \ h N >> O � d b Z O r Z;! K C O� O O �r 1p n ll W z(z7 O ~ o y - .Oi= O 00 .D a r7nm } I\ Z d 2 Q V W ¢ o % Z mem R \\ O 2 v, O z� F x y0,6 NU `�-x'Ug i z m Y 12 m Z O W Um 3 V y LL o ZLLJ Z_ m a Ur p `� a o a a a @ 4l 1. U _._.� • Wa. u' r, F �a a ? i y F qw y ~ w X O w Sa a Fn H a W m N u'S f z G A 99 >¢ w W m m 3 3`a op m,Q oy o O O W Z 7 V O k y r ,� i p� y a w r- x 3 CO N o p m K S 5 " o o o o a w \ Tj \ +l F- O 00 MO i \ T- I +I I� a O Qpm ti cri 3: (') IOW I IN IM LL J� cy) Zy: c0 \ WI ►►- \ � i 1� \ -_ - - - - - - -_ - - \ 1 3SV3 nvo.s \t \ .0'09 .9'06 - - - - - N 3sv3naa,o- - - - - Lu L_, W I 9sa,0 9z - - , °°I SS8.o oz LU N`�� ,` I --- - � , I_l I ILI ISI + co Ln I co cn CDcn Q I o - LOT N �a oo U- Z)o0 N o I I� I O 'I �� p N � ?� c.1 , 11,200 SF Nr` o Y v CN _.� 5' LOOKOUT I rn O 00 O T rn 4� l LF:950.50 I OTT TB:95&50 1 I GF:958.00 I as3,0'96 o09 I ( esd,oss0 voo� o co 3SV3 na.oi. .0'09 Z'001Vg --- _.. -- ---- - .. _� __— �_ _—__—�_—__ ----------- ----- rl J&1 „SO.i)N ��7+ �� — 13-.nr- `--"—`—*--<---�—�__1_c-.8"-'6—�`--•.—.!_..-.s 6 .��-_�...I _q--B�... -_ —F---• --_._ _.S-.fi—i--�\_-�^).—!�_._.4—< 5 ..6-._,;..- _. -- -- ------------------—-------i----i-----g' --------------—------- - ---------- - ---------- Lf I I � I + I I I I I I I I i I GENERAL GRADING NOTES: .'t 1.SEE SITE PLAN FOR HORIZONTAL LAYOUT&GENERAL GRADING NOTES. 11, FINISHED GRADING SHALL BE COMPLETED.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL UNIFORMLY GRADE 'oiIII„ I i A - 2.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE THE SITE GRADING CONSTRUCTION(INCLUDING BUT AREAS WITHIN LIMITSOF GRADING,INCLUDING ADJACENT TRANSITION AREAS.PROVIDE A C NOT LINKED 70 SITE PREPARATION,SOIL CORRECTION,EXCAVATION,EMBANKMENT,ETC.)IN SMOOTH FINISHED SURFACE WITHIN SPECIFIED TOLERANCES,WITH UNIFORM LEVELS OR 4931 W.SETH ST.BUTS 2W ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OWNER'S SOILS ENGINEER.ALL SOIL SLOPES BETWEEN POINTS WHERE ELEVATIONS.ARE SHOWN,OR BETWEEN SUCH POINTS AND 6T.L�BSP K,D 65416 TESTING SHALL BE COMPLETED BY THE OWNERS SOILS ENGINEER.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL EXISTING GRADES.AREAS THAT WAVE BEEN FINISH GRADED SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM Men P.. Pel sane BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING ALL REQUIRED SOIL TESTS AND INSPECTKNS WITH SUBSEQUENT CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS,TRAFFIC AND EROSION.REPAIR ALL AREAS THAT Im-21s334a v5z2eu2uus THE SOILS ENGINEER. HAVE BECOME RUTTED BY TRAFFIC OR ERODED BY WATER OR HAS SETTLED BELOW THE :., ••• CORRECT GRADE.ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY THE CONTRACTOR'S OPERATIONS SHALL BE „•-i•;r -,- '+ - 3.GRADING AND EXCAVATION ACTIVITIES SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RESTORED TO EQUAL OR BETTER THAN ORIGINAL CONDITION OR TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF NATIONAL POLLUTION DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM(NPOES)PERMIT REQUIREMENTS& THE NEW WORK. GRADING LIMIT,SILT- PERMIT REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY, 12. PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF THE AGGREGATE BASE,A TEST ROLL WILL BE REQUIRED ON THE FENCE 4.PROPOSED SPOT GRADES ARE FLOW{ME FINISHED GRADE ELEVATIONS,UNLESS STREET ANDIOR PARKING AREA SUBGRADE.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A LOADED OTHERWISE NOTEM TANDEM AXLE TRUCK WITH A GROSS WEIGHT OF 25 TONS THE TEST ROLLING SHALL BE AT 5.GRADES OF WALKS SHALL 3E INSTALLED WITH 5%MAX.LONGITUDINAL SLOPE AND 1%MIN. THE DIRECTION OF THE SOILS ENGINEER AND SHALL 3E COMPLETED IN AREAS AS DIRECTED AND 2W MAX.CROSS SLOPE,UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. BY THE SOILS ENGINEER.THE SOLS ENGINEER$HALL DETERMINE WHICH SECTIONS OF THE 4 �� +r'~�� _,rT♦'� �"� ��'�"'�� - STREET OP..PAR<NG AREA.ARE UNSTABLE CORRECTION OF THE SUBGRADE SOILS SHALL BE { 4 % B.PROPOSED SLOPES SHALL NOT EXCEED 3:1 UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE ON THE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH TiE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SOILS ENGINEER, _ 10'D&U EASE. A, DRAWINGS.MAXIMUM SLOPES IN MAINTAINED AREAS IS 4:1 7.PROPOSED RETAINING WALLS,FREESTANDING WALLS,OR COMBINATION OF WALL TYPES 13' I OLEHANCt$ X111 'I - r +" + "�'♦ \ GREATER THAN 4'IN HEIGHT SHALL BE DESIGNED AND ENGINEERED BY A REGISTERED 131. THE BUILDING SUBGRADE FINISHED SURFACE ELEVATION SHALL NOT VARY BY MORE I�. ®5•.00 { ♦ ♦ THAN 030 FOOT ABOVE,OR 0.30 FOOT BELOW,THE PRESCRIBED ELEVATION AT,ANY - ♦! - RETAINING WALL ENGINEER.DESIGN DRAWINGS SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTIONPOINT WHERE MEASUREMENT IS MADE. { \�♦ ` - . ♦ 132. THE STREET OR PARKING AREA SUBGRADE FINISHED SURFACE ELEVATION SHALL NCT LL - 8.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTENANCE OF GRADE STAKES VARY BY MORE THAN 0.05 FOOT ABOVE,OR 0.10 FOOT BELOW,THE PRESCRIBED 911 O:+-j I •-v { I y I �� THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION TO ESTABLISH PROPER GRADES,THE ELEVATION OF ANY POINT WHERE MEASUREMENT IS MADE Y M CD(D { I� I -855.50 853.50 �1 CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR A FINAL FIELD CHECK OF FINISHED GRADES 13.3. AREAS WHK;HARE TO RECEIVE TOPSOIL SHALL BE GRADED TO WITHIN 0.30 FOOT ABOVE O.O \ I \ ACCE°TABLE TC THE ENGINEERILANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO TOPSOIL AND SODDING EN BELOW THE REQUIRED ELEVATION,UNLESS DIRECTED OTHERWISE BY THE .� cn RP:953.50 ��h'I ACTIVITIES ENGIAEER. + +► CD po O O I ` 13.4, TOPSOIL SHALL BE GRADED TO PLUS OR MINUS 1/2 INCH OF THE SPECIFIED THICKNESS, co -O �-.�L.I. 00 P\� �' -. I , ( LOT 95t\ 9.IF EXCESS OR SHORTAGE OF SOL MATERIAL EXISTS,THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TRANSPORT 14.MAINTENANCE \ ALL EXCESS SOIL MATERIAL OFF THE SITE TO AN AREA SELECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR,OR ssa I � 14.1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT NEWLY GRADED AREAS FROM TRAFFIC AND I - - 0 p S+ \ IMPORT SUITABLE MATERIAL TO THE SITE. 37% c� 13,fl81 SF' \, EROSION,AND KEEP AREA FREE OF TRASH AND DEBRIS, 858.00 p lL1 - 10. EXCAVATE TOPSOIL FROM AREAS TO BE FURTHER EXCAVATED OR REGRADED AND 142, CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR AND REESTABLISH GRADES IN SETTLED.ERODED AND -- $'WALKOUT + ` STOCKPILE M AREAS DESIGNATED ON THE SITE THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SALVAGE ENOUGH RUTTED AREAS TO SPECIFIED TOLERANCES,DURING THE CONSTRUCTION,IF REQUIRED, N Z N ♦1 �• •• i`12.5'SSB I { \ AND DURING THE WARRANTY PERIOD ERODED AREAS WHERE TURF IS TO BE N - � ,�-C,:ry- -I LF:954.00 { A 10PS00.FOR RESPREADING ON THE SITEAS 9PEgFlED.E(CESS TOPSgLSH4LL BE PLACED ESTABLISHED SMALL BE RESEEDED AND MULCHED. LSO Q ISA SWALE °p N EMBANKMENT AREAS,OUTSIDE OF BUILDING PADS,ROADWAYS AND PARKING AREAS.THE , \ "", T6:962.00 14.3, WHERE COMPLETED COMPACTED AREAS ARE DISTURBED BY SUBSEQUENT ��'� I - ` CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBCUT CUT AREAS,WHERE TURF IS TO BE ESTABLISHED,TO P.DEPTH Z n' 2 1 6'D&U EASE. { \ SURFACECONSTRU, OPERATIONS PACT TO REQUIRED DENSITY PRIOR T FURTHHALL ER SCARIFY, Q IC 1 - `\ A OF d INCHES.RESPRFAD TOPSOIL IN AREAS WHERE TURF IS TO BE ESTABLISHED TO SURFACE,RESHAPE,AND COMPACT TO REQLHRED DENSITY PRIOR TO FURTHER C 1 - - - - - - - - - - - GF:961.50 ► > 0) MINIMUM DEPTH OF 4INCHES. CONSTRUCTION. > �, 0 J LU O LU Y/ m RP:957.00 �♦ I ��4(�/,{ GENERAL EROSION CONTROL NOTES: CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY GRADING NOTES: z Q 1 1 LL \\85s { o♦JT � / - 1.SEE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN(SWPPP)FOR EROSION AND 1.RESERVED FOR SPECIAL CITY NOTES ULI Z W i p { LOT 2 ar,0 I m{ I ♦� / / G! A _ SEDIMENTATION NOTES AND DETAILS. 0 II 13,810 SF 2,THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONTROLUNG ALL O J 0 1 I � p5' LOOKOUT i +II SILTATION AND EROSION OF THE PR0.ECT AREA ALL EROSION CONTROL AND SILTATION ILDU i tl1 , CONTROL MEASURES SHALL COMPLY WITH MINNESOTA'S BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES /'1 >- W 9 LF:954.50 I ; J �; MANUAL,THE CONTRACTOR SHALL USE WHATEVER MEANS NECESSARY TO CONTROL L� W Z 1 T6:962.50 I I N 1 /"" EROSION AND SILTATION INCLUDING,BUT NOT LIMITED TO,STAKED STRAW BALES,ROCK /%/ 0 J ; 1 I o �� ENTRANCES ANDJOR SILT FENCES.CONTROL SHALL COMMENCE WITH GRADING AND Lim J 1 3- CONTINUE THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT UNTIL ACCEPTANCE OF-HE WORK BY THE OWNER. �• I 1 GF:962.00 - _ I ,{!,. �/ THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY INCLUDES;ALL DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION AS Q Q 0 1 I{ 862.00 35.0' 20 '� REQUIRED TO PREVENT EROSION AND THE DEPOSITING OF SILT.THE OWNER MAY,AT z -J 0 ♦♦ I ��J HISIHER OPTION,DIRECT THE CONTRACTOR N HISIHER METHODS AS DEEMED FIT TO Z 3: 7 O ♦ <T ,, PROTECT PROPERTY AND IMPROVEMENTS.ANY DEPOSITING OF SILT OR MUD ON NEW'OR p L W I ♦\ cD ✓ A" EXISTING PAVEMENT ORIN EXISTING STORM SEWERS OR SWALES SHALL BE REMOVEDa Q I I ♦•> GRADING.L4fALLT J y AFTER EACH RAIN AND EFFECTED AREAS CLEANED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE OWNER, (n UJ Cf � , ALL AT THE EXPENSE OF THE CONTRACTOR. o _j 0 �Tl I 1 %; E&U FRSE• ''.'/ �, BLOCK NO. � /O/�� STRUCTURE LABEL,TYP. V TYP,qTY CURB 1 RA'i STATION H UTILITY STRUCTURE, 41 TYP.(SAN.) UTILITY UNE,TYP.(SAN.,WATERMAIN) w - -- - FINISHED k GRADE--� MH �UTILTTY SERVICES LINES,NP. a GONG,WALK 1` - - FINISHED ELEV.QLOT CORNER I HEREBY CERTIFY ORREPORT THIS PLAN, -. - - FRONT UTILITY�`� PREFkRCIRCA ED BY ME OR UNDER W Cl ECT SU�l l\1DVE EASEMENT •�...�" , 13 LILU.ISONANDTHATIAMADULY SUPEkVI Vtt AND THATIU I RNA DU LY \ UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF SUGGESTED DRIVEWAY _ b.OU `ROAD NAMEAn SOTA. LOCATION I ,F:E44.00 1�I - - -- - DRIVEWAY SLOPE 3 'I 13:' 0 BUILDNG FRONT PAD GARAGE FLOOR ELEV. - T8:&P44.544.S0 I� SETBACK sw R.Punk LOT IN -"'�J I 9 W -SIDE UTIUTY EASEMENT cAig 67.14 ucENm No 44263 LOT DIMENSIONS P;935.OD ' LOWEST FLOOR ELEV.�' `* I �,' ISSUElSUBMTfTAL SUMMARY TOP OF BLOCK ELEV. BUILDING PAD DATE DESCRIPTION D�1 I &7-IA PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTN- REAR PAD GROUND ELEV.- 930 RECOMMENDED HOUSE TYPE . I :�- BUILDING SIDE SETBACK - rn BUILDING REAR SETBACK SILT FENCE,TYP ,900 REAR UTILITY EASEMENT 135 PROPOSED CONTOURS-�" EXIST.CONTOURS REVISION SUMMARY TYPICAL LOT INFORMATION: DATE DESCRIPnON GOPHER STATE ONE CALL PRELIMINARY WW W.00PHERSTATEONECALL.ORG (600)252-1166 TOLL FREE GRADING PLAN (851)4540002 LOCAL �f�IV.%r C3.0 11,201.0. o'o1, i GENERAL UTILITY NOTES: 1.SEE SITE PLAN FOR HORIZONTAL DIMENSIONS AND LAYOUT AND GENERAL CONSTRUCTION '�••+,I I •�A NOTES, C 4991 W.96TH ST.SUTE 200 2.CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND ST.LOOS PARK,MN 58416 TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY O-A.G-pP- Me6 Ferek PM S&va NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF DISCREPANCIES OR VARWTIONS FROMTHE PLANS. issi1339aK ws-1Nl'tUltl STM H-1 6O"DIA 3.THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATION OF CONSTRUCT OVER EX 30" EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS I$BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES AND,WHERE POSSIBLE,MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD.THE STORM INFORMATION IS NOT TO BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE.THE CONTRACTOR RE=954,0(MATCH) MUST CALL THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY AT LEAST 48 HOURS BEFORE ANY EX IE NIS=948.5 EXCAVATION TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF LTIIJTIES,IT SHALL BE THE PROP IE E=947.7 RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CB-Z(27°DIA) CONFLICT WITH TFE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS.THE LOCATIONS OF RE=951.5 SMALL UTILITIES SHALL BE OBTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR,BY CALLING GOPHER STATE ONE 165 LF 12°HDPE CALL.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED STORM@0.50% It W-548,5 DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER I 4.ALL SOILS TESTING SHALL BE COMPLETED BY AN INDEPENDENT SOILS ENGINEER. EXCAVATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF REMOVING UNSTABLE OR UNSUTTA3LE SOILS SHALL BE COMPLETED AS REQUIRED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER.THE UTILITY BACKFILL CONSTRUCTION �� ..��-i�•��.� �„��„��.�� `' •", SHAT I COMPI Y WITH THF RFOUIRFMFNTS OF THF SOII S FNGINFFR.THF CONTRACTOR SHAII BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING ALL REQUIRED SOILS TESTS AND SOIL INSPECTIONS 1 O'D&U EASE. _ WITH THE SOILS ENGINEER. r S.UTILITY INSTALLATION SHALL CONFORM TO THE CURRENT EDITION OF STANDARD LOT 1 `% SPECIFICATIONS FOR WATER MAIN AND SERVICE LINE INSTALLATION"AVD"SANITARY SEWER EXISTING 4"SAN SERV.. I I I I \ AND STORM SEWER INSTALLATION"AS PREPARED BYTHE CRYENGINEERS ASSOCWTIONOF PROPOSEDI"WATER SERV.' ( \ MINNESOTA(CEAM).AND SHALL CONFORM WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY ANDTHE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS 6.ALL UTILITIES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE TO CITY REQUIREMENTS Or \ # 7.CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT OPEN,TURN OFF,IVTERFERE WITH.OR ATTACH ANY PIPE OR HOSE 7 0 I � TO OR TAP WATERMAiN BELONGING TO THE CITY UNLESS DULY AUTHORIZED TO 00 SO BY O N T 1 I THE CITY.ANY ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES OF ANY SCHEDULED OR UNSCHEDULED N Q N -n I I LOT 3 \ DISRUPTIONS OFSERVICE TOTHE PUBLI ARE THE LIABILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR Lf) U) 1 I to I 8.CASTINGS SHALL BE SALVAGED FROM STRUCTURE REMOVALS AND RE-USEC OR PLACED AT Z i,i I 13,081 SF �. THE DIRECTION OF THE OWNER. Q g Z \ z 9.ALL MATERIA-S SCALL BE AS SPECIFIED IN CEAM SPECI=ICATIONS EXCEPT AS MODIFIED O 7. HEREIN. O J J 10.ALL MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. O > ' W 6'D&U EASE. I \ 11.ALL WATER PSE SHALL BE DUCTILE IRON PIPE(DIP)UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. W Z2 - - - - ` - - - - - - - - -W I 12.ALL SANITARY SEWER SHALL BE POLYVINYL CHLORIDE(PVC)UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. WO LOT 2 aN� / 13.ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SI-ALL BE REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE(RCP)OR HIGH DENSITYJ EXISTING 4"SAN SERV. ' ll i W (j I I l POLYET-fYLENE(HOPE)UNLESS OTHER'WISENOTED. 0 1 ` 0 EXISTING 111 WATER SERV. ^�M ' W Y I p I I J `7 14.ALL JOINTS AND CONNECTIONS IV STORM SEWER SYSTEM SHALL BE GASTIGHT OR Q /� 7 7 L®1 G b 1\ WATERTIGHT.APPROVED RESILIENT RUBBER JOINTS MUST BE USED TO MAKE WATERTIGHT W Z iI I CONNECTIONS TO MANHOLES,CATCHBASINS,OR OTHER STRUCTURES. /�/ Z J {LI o ! 13,810 810 S F / 15,PIPE LENGTHS SHOWN ARE FROM CENTER TO CENTER OF STRUCTURE OR TO END OF �j W J >a j FLARED END SECTION. 2 Q O 16.UTILITIES ON THE PLAN ARE SHOWN TO WITHIN 5'OF THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT.THE g /\� i CONTRACTOR 6 ULTIMATELY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FINAL CONNECTION TO BUILDING LINES. Z Z / LOT 3 COORDINATE WITH ARCHITECTURAL AND MECHANICAL PLANS. ^J Q W W / EXISTING 4"SAN SERV. 17.CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE BUMPED 0.04 FEET.ALL CATCH �� Ill Q I / PROPOSED 1°WATER SERV. BASINS IN GUTTERS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.15 FEET PER DETAILS.RIM ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON V � J / THIS PLAN DO NOT REFLECT BUMPED ELEVA IONS. 0 O 18. A MINIMUM OF 8 FEET OF COVER IS REQUIRED OVERALL WATERMAIN,UNLESS OTHERWISE N /R ® I NOTED.EXTRA DEPTH MAY BE REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 18'VERTICAL V W SEPARATION TO SANITARY OR STORM SEWER LINES,EXTRA DEPTH WATERMAIN IS - - - - - INCIDENTAL v 1 L- _ _ �,/ 19.AMINIMUM Of 18 INCHES OF VERTICAL SEPARATION AND IO FEET OF HORIZONTAL EASE' �� SEPARATION IS REQUIRED FOR AL-WA"ERMAIN,STORM SEWER AND SANITARY SEWER PIPES, a UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PUN, WAS 20.ALL CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY STANDARDS SPECIFICATION,EN UREPORTDIR PREPARED BY ME D HATI MY DULY AND COORDINATED WITH THE CITU PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. sJP$WW ANDTHATIAMANak LI(:kNStU HtOFC.�SYUNK tN.ilNttk 21,CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING STRUCTURES SHALL BE CORE-DRILLED. UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF h0 ESOTA 22,COORDINATE LOCATIONS AND SIZES OF SERVICE CONNECTIONS WITH THE MECHANICAL . DRAWINGS. 23.COORDINATE INSTALLATION AND SCHEDULING OF THE INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES WITH M8 Lew R. Mk CST j7�7]\Tjjl?T7"10-''L' ADJACENT CONTRACTORS AND CITY STAFF. wre enn4 uCENSENO 44263 L,}`J1 Vt`T j j`JjJ�JJ,� 24.ALL STREET REPAIRS AND PATCHING SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF ISSUEISUBMITTAL SUMMARY THE CITY.ALL PAVEMENT CONNECTIONS SHALL BE SAWCUT.ALL TRAFFIC CONTROLS SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE ESTABLISHED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF DATE DESCRIPTION TIE MINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES(MMUTCD)AND THE CIN. 0,14 PRELIMINARY PLAT sUB,1ITTK THIS SHALL INCLUDE BLT NOT BE LIMITED TO SIGNAGE,BARRICADES,FASHERS,AND FLAGGERS AS NEEDED.ALL PUBLIC STREETS SHALL BE OPEN TO TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES.NO ROAD CLOSURES SHALL BE PERMITTED WITHOUT APPROVAL BY THE CM. 25.ALL STRUCTURES,PUBLIC AND PRIVATE,SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO PROPOSED GRADES WHERE REQUIRED.THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL OWNERS MUST BE COMPLIED WITH. STRUCTURES BEING RESET TO PAVED AREAS MUST MEET OWNERS REQUIREMENTS FOR TRAFFIC LOADING. 26.CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL WORK WITH PRIVATE UTILITY COMPANIES. REVISION SUMMARY 27.CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE CONNECTION OF IRRIGATION SERVICE TO UTILITIES. COORDINATE THE INSTALLATION OF IRRIGATION SLEEVES NECESSARY AS TO NOT IMPACT DATE DESCRIPTION INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES. 28.CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ASBULT PIANS THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION AND SUBMIT CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY UTILITY NOTES: THESE PIANS TO ENGINEER UPON COMPLETION OF WORK 1,RESERVED FOR SPECIAL CITY NOTES GOPHER STATE ONE CALL PRELIMINARY VWV V.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG (800)252-1168 TOLL FREE ^ UTILITY PLAN (651)457-0002 LOCAL 1'=20'-0' C4.0 i ZZ1+99 NW'A311VA N30100 3nN3AV 000MN910 1009x ¢ z O a Z= � O �n ANVdWOO ONdl A311VA N30100 ��z{5�L= g � z Q 3 ZZb99 NW'A3llVA N9010WH1NON 3NVl M00V3W OOZ o s 3< N a d NN �U xgN ow47w a z O a a LU W �uB�J K W SGOOM 30GUANNns �o3road 4 a4 Q W 0 ZW <0 0 W z w M O $� H W N } C w W J N =m z ui zW LU a 0 � LL O 0 r � � , /VIII i i i � r•�` r' N W"`✓� � \1No �`, ,n I10 - 1 -' � � � No mE r♦ -Fl IW 1 1`0 ^ - n' v4 �ai� ,♦ � 1 ��'q III :_° ,♦ 1 _.-... 1 I 0� 4� ', I LOQ 1 11.,200 SF o 0 3, 1II - Io 1�'a 1 ma � C I xx yy -VI AZ n "w city 0 gotaen MEMORANDUM valley Administrative Services Department 763-593-8013 1763-593-3969(fax) ,�i�q. Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting October 7, 2014 Agenda Item 4. C. Public Hearing-Special Assessments -2014 Miscellaneous Charges Prepared By Sue Virnig, Finance Director Summary The following resolution needs to be approved for certification of special assessments for miscellaneous charges. Attachments • List of delinquent miscellaneous bills for certification (1 page) • Resolution Adopting and Confirming Assessments for Miscellaneous Charges (2 pages) Recommended Action Motion to adopt Resolution Adopting and Confirming Assessments for Miscellaneous Charges. City of Golden Valley 2014 Miscellaneous Certification Levy 18833 Cert PID Property Address Description CertAmt Pymt Balance 30-118-21-12-0052 2365 ZEALAND AVE N CITATION 130.00 130.00 31-118-21-31-0044 9050 GOLDEN VAL RD MOWING 530.00 530.00 29-118-21-12-0044 6839 MEDICINE LAKE RD MOWING 467.50 467.50 31-118-21-12-0070 1000 BOONE AVE STE 200 ALARM 137.28 137.28 0.00 28-118-21-33-0019 1530 CONSTANCE DR W MOWING 405.00 405.00 29-118-21-44-0084 6525 KNOLL ST CITATION 780.00 780.00 04-117-21-22-0006 125 BRUNSWICK AVE S MOWING 405.00 405.00 30-118-21-14-0054 2105 WINNETKA AVE TREE REMOVAL 441.94 441.94 19-029-24-32-0052 422 CLOVERLEAF DR LEGAL FEES 2,286.00 2,286.00 19-029-24-41-0068 312 MEADOW LN MOWING 780.00 780.00 06-117-21-14-0055 7925 WAYZATA BLVD FALSE ALARM 137.28 137.28 04-117-21-24-0030 901 XENIA AVE S FALSE ALARMS 351.83 351.83 0.00 05-117-21-13-0022 6925 MARKET ST FALSE ALARM 137.28 137.28 0.00 07-029-24-42-0082 3115 MAJOR AVE N CITATION 280.00 280.00 33-118-21-33-0007 25 PAISLEY LN FALSE ALARM 244.55 244.55 30-118-21-42-0012 8430 WESLEY DR CITATION 1,380.00 1,380.00 17-029-24-22-0032 2417 PARKVIEW BLVD CITATION 130.00 130.00 18-029-24-31-0075 4960 DULUTH ST MOWING 355.00 355.00 17-029-24-22-0030 2429 PARKVIEW BLVD CITATION 880.00 880.00 30-029-24-41-0063 1512 ALPINE PASS CITATION 530.00 530.00 19-029-24-13-0038 4600 OLSON MEM HWY FALSE ALARM 137.28 137.28 28-118-21-33-0015 1500 DOUGLAS DR#306 NOISE 755.00 755.00 0.00 32-118-21-32-0055 7712 OLSON MEM HWY FALSE ALARM 351.83 351.83 0.00 19-029-24-31-0003 4725- 200 OLSON MEM HWY ALARM 137.28 137.28 29-118-21-22-0018 7775 MEDICINE LK RD FALSE ALAR 130.00 130.00 0.00 19-029-24-43-0056 100 ARDMORE DR CITATION 530.00 530.00 28-118-21-23-0001 2230 DOUGLAS DR CITATION 380.00 380.00 13,210.05 1,863.22 11,346.83 Resolution 14-80 October 7, 2014 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION ADOPTING AND CONFIRMING ASSESSMENTS FOR MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES (WEEDS, FALSE ALARMS, ADMINISTRATIVE CITATIONS, ETC) 1. The amount proper and necessary to be specially assessed at this time for various public improvements: Project Years Interest Rate First Year Levy Total Assessed 2014 Miscellaneous 1 5% 2015 $13,210.05 Charges against every assessable lot, piece, or parcel of land affected thereby has been duly calculated upon the basis of benefits, without regard to cash valuation, in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and notice has been duly published, as required by law that this Council would meet to hear, consider and pass upon all objections, if any, and said proposed assessment has at all time since its filing been open for public inspection and an opportunity has been given to all interested persons to present their objections if any, to such proposed assessments. 2. This Council, having heard and considered all objections so presented, finds that each of the lots, pieces and parcels of land enumerated in the proposed assessment was and is specially benefited by the construction of said improvement in not less than the amount of the assessment set opposite the description of each such lot, piece and parcel of land respectively, and such amount so set out is hereby levied against each of the respective lots, pieces and parcels of land therein described. 3. The proposed assessments are hereby adopted and confirmed as the proper assessments for each of said lots, pieces and parcels of land respectively, and the assessment against each parcel, together with interest at the rate of five (5) percent per annum accruing on the full amount thereof unpaid, shall be a lien concurrent with general taxes upon parcel and all thereof. The total amount of each such assessment not prepaid shall be payable in equal annual principal installments extending over a period of years, as indicated in each case. The first of said installments, together with interest on the entire assessment for the period of January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015, will be payable with property taxes collectible in 2015. 4. Prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, the owner of any lot, piece or parcel of land assessed hereby may at any time pay the whole such assessment, with interest to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer, but no interest shall be charged if such payment is made by November 14, 2014. Resolution 14-80 - Continued October 7, 2014 5. The City Clerk shall, as soon as may be, prepare and transmit to the County Auditor a certified duplicate of the assessment roll, with each installment and interest on each unpaid assessment set forth separately, to be extended upon the proper tax lists of the County and the County Auditor shall thereafter collect said assessment in the manner provided by law. Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by the City Clerk. city o gotaen . MEMORANDUM Administrative �.. /� Services Department 763-593-8013/763-593-3969(fax) 1 ��==' ,=T ". ii s P`S' :' gliil iuiPiMi Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting October 7, 2014 Agenda Item 4. D. Public Hearing- Special Assessments - 2014 Delinquent Utility Bills -Golden Valley Prepared By Sue Virnig, Finance Director Summary The following resolution needs to be approved for certification of special assessments for delinquent utility bills that are billed from the City of Golden Valley. Attachments • List of delinquent Golden Valley utility bills for certification (9 pages) • Resolution Adopting and Confirming Assessments for Delinquent Golden Valley Utility Billing (2 pages) Recommended Action Motion to adopt Resolution Adopting and Confirming Assessments for Delinquent Golden Valley Utility Billing. City of Golden Valley 2014 Utility Billing Certification Levy 18833 Property ID# Service Address Cert Amt Pymts Cert Balances 3211821220016 7701 PLYMOUTH AVE N 597.44 597.44 3211821220122 1013 SUMTER AVE N 181.43 181.43 0.00 3211821110047 6500 PHOENIX ST 955.88 955.88 3211821110007 6300 PHOENIX ST 191.44 191.44 3211821320020 7840 HAROLD AVE 271.62 271.62 3211821310015 7031 GLENWOOD AVE 1,383.95 1,383.95 3211821420046 6810 KINGSTON CIR 1,687.30 1,687.30 3211821430032 6741 GLENWOOD AVE 302.24 302.24 3211821410018 6438 WESTCHESTER CIR 585.65 585.65 0511721230055 840 PENNSYLVANIA AVE S 9,977.21 9,977.21 0511721120032 155 LOUISIANA AVE S 1,030.70 1,030.70 0511721110020 6585 CORTLAWN CIR N 547.23 547.23 0511721110042 100 FLORIDA CT 1,233.16 1,233.16 3011821230152 2004 HILLSBORO AVE N 181.43 181.43 3011821230139 2013 GETTYSBURG AVE N 545.16 545.16 3011821230131 1912 GETTYSBURG AVE N 982.45 982.45 3011821110063 8155 WYNNWOOD RD 813.61 300.00 513.61 3011821110085 8181 MEDICINE LAKE RD 629.27 629.27 3011821320110 1628 MENDELSSOHN AVE N 624.87 624.87 3011821320090 1620 INDEPENDENCE AVE N 565.71 565.71 3011821320032 1808 INDEPENDENCE AVE N 690.96 690.96 3011821320076 1633 HILLSBORO AVE N 927.23 927.23 3011821330105 1325 FLAG AVE N 1,069.20 1,069.20 3011821430076 1315 MANDAN AVE N 1,104.44 1,104.44 3011821430026 1520 AQUILA AVE N 270.17 270.17 3011821410076 1820 WISCONSIN AVE N 585.15 585.15 0.00 3011821420023 8345 WESLEY DR 479.81 479.81 3011821420078 8525 JULIANNE TER 262.41 262.41 3111821140034 8121 10TH AVE N 1,008.11 1,008.11 3111821110033 1010 ORKLA DR 620.41 620.41 3111821310029 339 ENSIGN AVE N 785.60 785.60 3111821310023 408 DECATUR AVE N 416.23 416.23 0611721110055 18 WESTERN TER 114.64 114.64 1702924310022 1709 YORK AVE N 142.31 142.31 1702924310021 1705 YORK AVE N 142.31 142.31 1702924310020 1703 YORK AVE N 142.31 142.31 1702924310003 1701 XERXES AVE N 193.36 193.36 1702924310018 1700 YORK AVE N 142.31 142.31 1702924240040 3016 GOLDEN VALLEY RD 1,926.11 1,926.11 1702924220072 2420 BYRD AVE N 1,404.27 1,404.27 0702924240091 3312 REGENT AVE N 1,098.64 1,098.64 0702924240013 4820 LOWRY TER 197.31 197.31 0702924240007 5001 34TH AVE N 849.80 849.80 Property ID# Service Address Cert Amt Pymts Cert Balances 0702924420066 4501 ELMDALE RD 1,245.93 1,245.93 0702924430010 2720 KYLE AVE N 736.21 736.21 0702924310017 2913 NOBLE AVE N 253.08 253.08 0702924310047 3026 PERRY AVE N 834.22 834.22 0702924320006 2912 REGENT AVE N 762.95 762.95 0702924340097 4901 CULVER RD 1,004.26 1,004.26 0702924340026 2775 QUAIL AVE N 952.31 952.31 0702924330038 2750 REGENT AVE N 763.45 763.45 0702924330015 2775 REGENT AVE N 1,069.30 1,069.30 1902924220072 1200 LILAC DR N 1,815.43 1,815.43 0.00 0702924310037 2901 ORCHARD AVE N 696.93 696.93 1702924310033 1800 ZEPHYR PL 175.24 175.24 1702924240022 1911 XERXES AVE N 226.31 226.31 1702924240026 1933 XERXES AVE N 226.31 226.31 1702924240005 2301 YORK AVE N 84.12 84.12 1702924210042 2305 YORK AVE N 304.97 304.97 1802924240033 4955 WESTBEND RD 267.89 267.89 1902924440045 200 SUNNYRIDGE LN 1,210.11 1,210.11 1902924410071 400 MEADOW LN N 770.87 770.87 1902924410068 312 MEADOW LN N 143.76 143.76 1902924320012 540 CLOVERLEAF DR 944.54 944.54 3002924220001 15 TURNPIKE RD 1,170.27 1,170.27 3002924130014 4500 SUNSET RIDGE 338.26 338.26 3002924140045 4102 WAYZATA BLVD 542.33 542.33 2811821320044 6055 WOLFBERRY LN 919.15 919.15 2811821320066 6120 SAINT CROIX AVE N 797.80 797.80 2811821330019 1530 CONSTANCE DR W 561.44 561.44 2811821340040 1608 WELCOME AVE N 877.88 877.88 0411721220056 110 KING CREEK RD 1,602.47 1,602.47 2911821310008 1801 MARYLAND AVE N 944.09 944.09 2911821310028 7250 GREEN VALLEY RD 106.23 106.23 2911821340063 1345 LOUISIANA AVE N 924.72 924.72 2911821430016 1536 JERSEY AVE N 356.15 356.15 2911821430041 1430 LOUISIANA AVE N 2,086.16 2,086.16 2911821440073 6508 KNOLL ST 672.20 672.20 2911821440087 1336 FLORIDA AVE N 670.18 670.18 2911821210031 2525 NEVADA AVE N 453.84 453.84 0.00 2811821340013 5545 GOLDEN VALLEY RD 59.72 59.72 0.00 2911821230046 1900 SUMTER AVE N 998.42 998.42 2911821240050 7200 DULUTH ST 69.79 69.79 3011821320050 1614 GETTYSBURG AVE N 540.74 540.74 3011821120006 8555 MEDICINE LAKE RD 928.25 928.25 3111821110015 1124 ORKLA DR 824.18 824.18 3011821430041 8640 WINSDALE ST 1,425.59 1,425.59 3002924410086 1300 FRANCE AVE S 1,723.35 1,723.35 2911821120008 6825 SANDBURG LA 1,497.68 1,497.68 0702924430061 2611 LEE AVE N 520.22 520.22 0.00 Property ID# Service Address Cert Amt Pymts Cert Balances 3211821110018 6620 PHOENIX ST 578.21 578.21 1802924110011 2311 INDIANA AVE N 884.39 884.39 2911821440125 6528 WINSDALE ST 813.67 813.67 3211821430065 225 KENTUCKY AVE N 1,073.57 1,073.57 1902924220055 1130 UNITY AVE N 330.61 330.61 0.00 1702924240006 2225 XERXES AVE N 175.26 175.26 0.00 3011821410013 1512 ORKLA DR 759.44 759.44 2811821210047 2345 VALE CREST RD 1,484.98 1,484.98 0702924340075 4820 MARIE LN E 980.33 980.33 0.00 1802924320033 5020 SAINT CROIX AVE N 183.89 183.89 2811821240023 2205 VALE CREST RD 148.99 148.99 3011821330046 1528 MENDELSSOHN AVE N 642.03 642.03 3002924210020 400 NATCHEZ AVE S 1,540.61 1,540.61 0511721220035 500 RHODE ISLAND AVE S 790.58 790.58 1802924130001 2040 NOBLE AVE N 800.13 800.13 3011821320096 1625 INDEPENDENCE AVE N 857.84 857.84 1802924230052 2040 UNITY AVE N 793.97 793.97 1702924220066 2413 MCNAIR DR 947.59 947.59 3211821110038 6712 GOLDEN VALLEY RD 1,020.93 1,020.93 3111821120074 1160 BOONE AVE N 693.83 693.83 1702924240008 2200 GLENWOOD PKWY 1,108.43 1,108.43 2911821240040 2120 KELLY DR 234.21 234.21 3002924230051 5221 CIRCLE DOWN 1,149.62 1,149.62 0702924240005 3338 REGENT AVE N 825.65 825.65 2911821410012 1625 FLORIDA AVE N 1,135.24 1,135.24 3011821110028 2445 ORKLA DR 463.17 463.17 0.00 3011821230126 1905 FLAG AVE N 182.73 182.73 0702924130024 3329 KYLE AVE N 50.58 50.58 3311821330013 250 PAISLEY LN 1,409.98 1,409.98 0.00 2811821340049 1300 WELCOME AVE N 1,343.31 1,343.31 3211821310003 7182 HAROLD AVE 197.08 197.08 2911821330075 1438 RHODE ISLAND AVE N 1,163.25 1,163.25 3211821220053 1116 QUEBEC AVE N 832.91 832.91 3011821410085 7900 WESLEY DR 1,073.99 1,073.99 0611721110064 43 WESTERN TER 1,292.26 1,292.26 0611721140042 805 HANLEY RD 1,300.28 1,300.28 3011821230146 9200 EARL ST 1,082.57 1,082.57 3211821440004 319 EDGEWOOD AVE N 354.87 354.87 3211821430020 6940 WESTERN AVE 1,015.50 1,015.50 2911821430010 7035 OLYMPIA ST 1,075.43 1,075.43 1902924420056 4301 WOODSTOCK AVE 509.07 509.07 0702924340029 2745 QUAIL AVE N 737.12 737.12 0702924310021 2936 ORCHARD AVE N 679.68 679.68 3211821220062 1042 QUEBEC AVE N 680.65 680.65 3011821440027 1336 VALDERS AVE N 853.97 50.00 803.97 0702924230049 3210 SCOTT AVE N 49.04 49.04 0.00 2911821410013 6527 HAMPSHIRE PL N 97.33 97.33 Property ID# Service Address Cert Amt Pymts Cert Balances 3011821210053 8845 MEDLEY LN N 1,471.79 1,471.79 1702924310054 1831 XERXES AVE N 610.88 610.88 3011821110042 2360 ORKLA DR 1,428.47 1,428.47 3002924120050 213 WESTWOOD DR 5 1,001.78 1,001.78 2911821320025 1621 RHODE ISLAND AVE N 1,697.51 1,697.51 3111821110023 1211 WINNETKA AVE N 711.59 711.59 3002924420090 4545 DOUGLAS AVE 236.73 236.73 3011821140006 2041 WINNETKA AVE N 848.65 848.65 3011821110086 8179 MEDICINE LAKE RD 419.77 419.77 1702924210051 2506 MERIDIAN DR 427.98 427.98 2811821220062 2415 BRUNSWICK AVE N 997.22 180.00 817.22 2811821230005 6027 WESTMORE WAY 371.16 371.16 3211821420069 350 IDAHO AVE N 1,126.58 1,126.58 2911821230017 2021 PENNSYLVANIA AVE N 848.95 848.95 0411721220173 6015 GLENWOOD AVE 177.54 177.54 0.00 0411721220054 280 KING HILL RD 232.79 30.00 202.79 3011821140042 7901 23RD AVE N 147.82 147.82 1802924240074 2142 PERRY AVE N 1,087.45 1,087.45 2911821320015 1720 WINNETKA AVE N 1,020.24 1,020.24 3011821430044 1512 BOONE AVE N 172.03 172.03 0.00 0702924240023 3201 ORCHARD AVE N 720.37 720.37 1902924320010 534 CLOVERLEAF DR 1,349.90 600.00 749.90 1802924410026 1600 BRIDGEWATER RD 405.99 405.99 2811821340070 5732 GOLDEN VALLEY RD 176.23 176.23 0411721220018 325 BRUNSWICK AVE S 956.56 956.56 2811821340067 1437 XENIA AVE N 875.39 875.39 3002924410012 1319 TYROL TRL 657.19 657.19 0702924420089 3026 NOBLE AVE N 127.35 127.35 0611721110016 300 WINNETKA AVE S 210.42 210.42 0.00 3211821440024 125 EDGEWOOD AVE N 1,463.52 1,463.52 3011821330117 1400 GETTYSBURG AVE N 685.27 685.27 3211821310009 7430 HAROLD AVE 607.43 607.43 1902924410095 425 SUNNYRIDGE LN 884.44 884.44 1802924110039 2565 BYRD AVE N 84.59 84.59 3011821110024 8040 WYNNWOOD RD 609.95 609.95 2811821340020 1435 XENIA AVE N 736.29 736.29 0702924310082 3101 ORCHARD AVE N 1,020.80 1,020.80 3111821310031 347 ENSIGN AVE N 929.59 929.59 3011821140020 8161 WESTBEND RD 1,065.29 1,065.29 1702924310012 1814 YORK AVE N 925.54 925.54 0511721210020 170 OREGON AVE S 1,775.69 1,775.69 0702924420083 3101 MAJOR AVE N 259.32 259.32 3002924310026 1515 PRINCETON AVE S 1,145.13 1,145.13 0702924430094 4521 CULVER RD 1,031.34 1,031.34 3211821420061 6840 HAROLD AVE 1,264.26 1,264.26 3211821420066 6855 HAROLD AVE 289.40 289.40 3002924120018 4521 WESTWOOD LA 510.99 510.99 Property ID# Service Address Cert Amt Pymts Cert Balances 2811821320018 6015 DULUTH LN 760.21 760.21 0702924240037 3341 NOBLE AVE N 348.05 348.05 0702924320037 5320 TRITON DR 957.22 957.22 0.00 3211821220094 1031 SUMTER AVE N 331.41 331.41 1902924410045 517 INDIANA AVE N 771.25 771.25 2811821330009 1375 OAK GROVE CIR 1,405.77 1,405.77 3011821430004 1325 CASTLE CT 1,176.55 1,176.55 1902924220011 1130 WILLS PL 202.01 202.01 3011821140060 2135 VALDERS AVE N 1,024.71 1,024.71 3011821140091 2150 ORKLA DR 620.40 620.40 0702924420081 3125 MAJOR AVE N 721.63 721.63 2811821340051 1325 WELCOME AVE N 926.29 926.29 1702924210076 3400 MANOR DR 810.67 810.67 0702924320036 5325 LOWRY TER 868.37 868.37 3011821230149 1908 HILLSBORO AVE N 636.18 636.18 1802924210024 2540 QUAIL AVE N 668.31 668.31 2911821440022 6525 OLYMPIA ST 891.51 891.51 2911821430091 6738 PLYMOUTH AVE N 107.83 107.83 3211821120018 1231 HAMPSHIRE AVE N 790.01 790.01 2911821420037 7080 GREEN VALLEY RD 969.09 969.09 3011821430043 1508 BOONE AVE N 310.46 310.46 3011821220074 2424 MENDELSSOHN LN 366.67 366.67 1902924430056 100 ARDMORE DR 628.13 628.13 1802924240088 2120 WINDSOR WAY 662.92 662.92 1802924440098 1359 WATERFORD DR 377.01 377.01 3311821210029 1129 WELCOME CIR 785.36 785.36 2911821230030 2001 QUEBEC AVE N 755.41 755.41 1702924220049 3524 MANOR DR 818.34 818.34 3002924130015 4508 SUNSET RIDGE 913.94 913.94 2811821220080 5900 WESTBROOK RD 1,164.68 1,164.68 0411721210029 115 KING CREEK RD 1,048.63 1,048.63 3011821410035 8090 WESLEY DR 934.38 934.38 3002924410047 1323 JUNE AVE S 695.29 695.29 3211821110012 6424 PHOENIX ST 608.80 608.80 3111821110042 1200 VALDERS AVE N 174.45 174.45 3011821320066 9200 OLYMPIA ST 596.87 596.87 3211821110045 1227 HAMPSHIRE AVE N 634.99 634.99 3211821220046 1224 RHODE ISLAND AVE N 815.96 815.96 3002924110016 9 PARKVIEW TER 310.66 200.00 110.66 3211821220104 1020 WINNETKA AVE N 524.64 524.64 2911821330038 1517 SUMTER AVE N 1,005.33 1,005.33 2911821430001 6730 OLYMPIA ST 75.47 75.47 2911821440084 6525 KNOLL ST 307.95 307.95 0.00 3011821330075 1312 INDEPENDENCE AVE N 2,958.43 2,958.43 0702924310035 2925 ORCHARD AVE N 605.56 605.56 3111821310044 9050 GOLDEN VALLEY RD 720.73 720.73 3011821110031 8229 MEDICINE LAKE RD 1,324.66 1,324.66 Property ID# Service Address Cert Amt Pymts Cert Balances 3311821330049 5924 GLENWOOD AVE 211.67 211.67 0702924310043 2942 PERRY AVE N 851.19 851.19 1802924310064 4941 SAINT CROIX AVE N 914.16 914.16 3011821320139 9100 NAPER ST 1,139.75 1,139.75 0702924310101 3120 REGENT AVE N 738.41 738.41 1902924440058 234 SUNNYRIDGE LN 711.00 711.00 3011821330080 1412 INDEPENDENCE AVE N 868.62 868.62 0.00 3011821410065 8210 JULIANNE TER 297.17 297.17 3211821220063 1037 QUEBEC AVE N 259.33 259.33 3011821440053 1412 WISCONSIN AVE N 147.77 147.77 0702924330035 2745 REGENT AVE N 1,220.31 1,220.31 2911821230061 2000 WINNETKA AVE N 730.78 730.78 2811821220093 2422 DOUGLAS DR N 204.82 204.82 2911821230053 2021 SUMTER AVE N 1,158.92 1,158.92 3011821320138 9110 NAPER ST 285.61 285.61 0702924420095 2945 MAJOR AVE N 782.71 782.71 2911821320067 1611 PENNSYLVANIA AVE N 63.52 63.52 0.00 2811821220020 2525 ZANE AVE N 867.29 867.29 2911821340074 1435 LOUISIANA AVE N 376.90 376.90 2911821310016 1796 MARYLAND AVE N 1,209.82 1,209.82 2911821330122 1516 SUMTER AVE N 845.78 845.78 3011821320034 1816 INDEPENDENCE AVE N 51.16 51.16 3002924210050 5030 COLONIAL DR 1,836.35 1,836.35 3002924420074 4520 DOUGLAS AVE 1,731.87 1,731.87 0511721210057 150 LOUISIANA AVE S 948.28 948.28 1802924140023 4035 WASATCH LN 796.13 796.13 2911821430090 6724 PLYMOUTH AVE N 171.94 171.94 2911821430019 6817 OLYMPIA ST 686.81 686.81 0611721110051 10 WESTERN TER 389.15 389.15 3311821330029 200 CUTACROSS RD 142.66 142.66 0.00 3011821410009 8001 WESLEY DR 693.33 693.33 3002924110014 4253 GLENWOOD AVE 142.31 142.31 3011821410063 8101 DULUTH ST 321.48 321.48 0702924430045 2731 MAJOR AVE N 1,213.05 1,213.05 3011821430016 1517 ZEALAND AVE N 662.56 662.56 2811821230031 6025 WESTBROOK RD 561.44 561.44 3211821220074 1035 RHODE ISLAND AVE N 335.32 335.32 3002924220054 109 TURNPIKE RD 1,088.45 1,088.45 3002924220021 501 TURNPIKE RD 854.19 854.19 0702924420025 2936 KYLE AVE N 479.49 479.49 0702924420018 2937 JUNE AVE N 80.82 80.82 0511721230069 1050 RHODE ISLAND AVE S 760.44 760.44 3011821420061 8530 JULIANNE TER 818.01 818.01 3011821230033 2102 KINGS VALLEY RD 663.74 663.74 3011821230052 2107 KINGS VALLEY RD 911.81 911.81 3011821220045 2228 KINGS VALLEY RD E 348.21 348.21 3011821220038 2226 MAYFAIR RD 1,086.80 1,086.80 Property ID# Service Address Cert Amt Pymts Cert Balances 3011821230110 2203 STRODEN CIR 823.90 823.90 3011821230102 2101 TAMARIN TR 6,007.14 6,007.14 3011821230191 2135 TAMARIN TR 915.22 915.22 0702924430091 2601 KYLE AVE N 185.85 185.85 3011821230074 2106 TAMARIN TR 936.40 936.40 3011821230088 2129 TAMARIN TR 774.93 774.93 3011821320041 1621 FLAG AVE N 771.92 771.92 3011821230098 2109 TAMARIN TR 987.06 987.06 3011821230006 2116 MARQUIS RD 202.76 202.76 3011821110013 2445 VALDERS AVE N 88.37 88.37 3111821220024 9303 PLYMOUTH AVE N 1 362.35 362.35 0.00 3211821220002 7801 PLYMOUTH AVE N 439.11 439.11 2811821320051 6050 SAINT CROIX AVE N 676.11 676.11 3211821440070 6500 WESTERN AVE 1,095.01 1,095.01 3011821230068 2141 TAMARIN TR 2,158.65 2,158.65 3011821320058 1633 GETTYSBURG AVE N 125.38 125.38 3011821330054 1313 INDEPENDENCE AVE N 629.60 629.60 0702924310059 2937 CHEROKEE PL 775.42 775.42 3011821330128 1520 INDEPENDENCE AVE N 647.90 647.90 2811821230051 2150 DOUGLAS DR N 584.46 584.46 3011821330083 1405 GETTYSBURG AVE N 829.05 829.05 0511721230062 843 WINNETKA AVE S 415.03 415.03 1702924310057 1631 XERXES AVE N 95.50 95.50 3002924120047 105 WESTWOOD DR S 285.34 285.34 0.00 3002924130007 641 WESTWOOD DR S 303.50 303.50 0.00 3011821230055 2113 KINGS VALLEY RD 398.97 398.97 0702924310050 2925 PERRY AVE N 587.52 587.52 1702924240038 3026 GOLDEN VALLEY RD 566.58 566.58 3011821140057 2130 VALDERS AVE N 1,067.02 1,067.02 0702924330030 2670 SCOTT AVE N 351.98 150.00 201.98 2811821320033 6121 SAINT CROIX AVE N 1,190.18 1,190.18 3002924220047 417 TURNPIKE RD 227.24 227.24 1802924210019 4950 BASSETT CREEK DR 158.36 158.36 3311821330019 228 MEANDER RD 52.00 52.00 0411721240030 901 XENIA AVE S 141.97 141.97 0.00 1902924420042 328 BURNTSIDE DR 738.13 738.13 0702924340028 2755 QUAIL AVE N 39.84 39.84 2911821430030 6834 WINSDALE ST 549.99 549.99 1802924140065 2211 LEGEND DR 1,096.78 1,096.78 3011821420057 8525 PATSY LN 410.16 410.16 2911821230076 7833 23RD AVE N 773.01 773.01 3002924140044 4112 WAYZATA BLVD 441.02 441.02 3111821110043 1210 VALDERS AVE N 215.95 215.95 0.00 3011821140085 2155 ORKLA DR 855.82 855.82 2811821310017 5621 DULUTH ST 2,206.98 2,206.98 1702924310037 1635 XERXES AVE N 193.36 193.36 3011821140106 2209 WINNETKA AVE N 724.19 724.19 0.00 Property ID# Service Address Cert Amt Pymts Cert Balances 3111821220013 9200 10TH AVE N 694.62 694.62 1802924410020 1760 BRIDGEWATER RD 196.90 196.90 2811821320039 6020 WOLFBERRY LN 439.32 439.32 3211821340005 7465 HAROLD AVE 120.00 120.00 0702924420039 3100 LEE AVE N 637.57 637.57 3011821230035 2101 KINGS VALLEY RD W 1,046.42 1,046.42 0511721110032 6515 CORTLAWN CIR S 903.89 903.89 0611721140016 524 WINNETKA AVE S 718.81 718.81 3011821230020 2209 KINGS VALLEY RD E 987.99 987.99 1802924210058 4820 MARKAY RIDGE 434.70 434.70 3011821120017 2335 AQUILA AVE N 833.53 833.53 3002924420085 4312 AVONDALE RD 91.06 50.00 41.06 3311821310063 555 TURNERS CROSSROAD N 174.57 174.57 3011821230082 2138 TAMARIN TR 650.64 650.64 2811821210074 2260 WINFIELD AVE 265.09 265.09 0702924310083 4824 TRITON DR 201.00 201.00 0702924310120 3115 PERRY AVE N 114.41 114.41 0702924310123 3124 PERRY AVE N 107.15 107.15 0702924310121 3125 PERRY AVE N 107.15 107.15 0702924310122 3142 PERRY AVE N 72.34 72.34 1702924210015 3227 26TH AVE N 865.83 865.83 0702924420029 3115 KYLE AVE N 752.14 250.00 502.14 1802924320023 5328 SAINT CROIX AVE N 255.90 52.30 203.60 0702924130050 3331 LEE AVE N 202.70 202.70 0.00 3211821320017 440 WINNETKA AVE N 708.72 708.72 1902924410041 4205 OLSON MEMORIAL HWY 62.65 62.65 3011821230012 2109 MARQUIS RD 454.37 454.37 0.00 3002924120013 4520 WESTWOOD LA 713.78 713.78 2911821230055 1941 SUMTER AVE N 1,010.31 300.00 710.31 1902924440087 1 MEADOW LN N 409.78 409.78 0.00 1802924220184 2225 REGENT AVE N 890.42 890.42 3111821110030 1031 WINNETKA AVE N 119.36 119.36 0.00 3002924120008 104 MADDAUS LN 85.07 85.07 3002924120090 4501 STRAWBERRY LA 58.63 58.63 3002924210023 300 NATCHEZ AVE S 206.24 206.24 0.00 2811821340054 1305 WELCOME AVE N 331.64 331.64 0.00 2811821220048 6040 MANCHESTER DR 548.30 548.30 3011821140019 8201 WESTBEND RD 127.67 127.67 2911821440088 1320 FLORIDA AVE N 370.29 370.29 1802924130062 4325 GOLDEN VALLEY RD 524.10 524.10 3011821330132 0000 FLAG AVE N 105.50 105.50 3111821110014 1120 ORKLA DR 773.80 200.00 573.80 3211821220097 1009 SUMTER AVE N 248.19 248.19 3011821230186 2004 MENDELSSOHN AVE N 367.20 367.20 1802924310006 5000 GOLDEN VALLEY RD 128.00 128.00 3011821330073 1308 INDEPENDENCE AVE N 332.83 332.83 3211821430023 131 JERSEY AVE N 259.62 259.62 Property ID# Service Address Cert Amt Pymts Cert Balances 3011821230017 2119 MARQUIS RD 188.64 188.64 1802924310022 1644 SAINT CROIX CIR 167.26 167.26 1702924310006 1715 XERXES AVE N 84.35 84.35 0702924420089 3026 NOBLE AVE N 200.70 200.70 2811821330018 1520 CONSTANCE DR W 245.63 245.63 3311821220008 1200 DOUGLAS DR N 234.44 234.44 0.00 3011821230180 9400 EARL ST 161.12 161.12 3111821310011 400 DECATUR AVE N 108.05 108.05 2911821110021 2417 DOUGLAS DR N 80.68 80.68 3011821330073 1308 INDEPENDENCE AVE N 93.44 93.44 3011821230162 1905 HILLSBORO AVE N 75.89 75.89 268,392.01 16,278.27 252,113.74 Resolution 14-81 October 7, 2014 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION ADOPTING AND CONFIRMING ASSESSMENTS FOR DELINQUENT GOLDEN VALLEY UTILITY BILLING 1. The amount proper and necessary to be specially assessed at this time for various public improvements: Project Years Interest Rate First Year Levy Total Assessed 2014 1 5% 2015 $268,392.01 Delinquent Utility Billing against every assessable lot, piece, or parcel of land affected thereby has been duly calculated upon the basis of benefits, without regard to cash valuation, in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and notice has been duly published, as required by law that this Council would meet to hear, consider and pass upon all objections, if any, and said proposed assessment has at all time since its filing been open for public inspection and an opportunity has been given to all interested persons to present their objections if any, to such proposed assessments. 2. This Council, having heard and considered all objections so presented, finds that each of the lots, pieces and parcels of land enumerated in the proposed assessment was and is specially benefited by the construction of said improvement in not less than the amount of the assessment set opposite the description of each such lot, piece and parcel of land respectively, and such amount so set out is hereby levied against each of the respective lots, pieces and parcels of land therein described. 3. The proposed assessments are hereby adopted and confirmed as the proper assessments for each of said lots, pieces and parcels of land respectively, and the assessment against each parcel, together with interest at the rate of five (5) percent per annum accruing on the full amount thereof unpaid, shall be a lien concurrent with general taxes upon parcel and all thereof. The total amount of each such assessment not prepaid shall be payable in equal annual principal installments extending over a period of years, as indicated in each case. The first of said installments, together with interest on the entire assessment for the period of January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015, will be payable with general taxes for the year of 2014, collectible in 2015. 4. Prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, the owner of any lot, piece or parcel of land assessed hereby may at any time pay the whole such assessment , with interest to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer, but no interest shall be charged if such payment is made by November 14, 2014. Resolution 14-81 - Continued October 7, 2014 5. The City Clerk shall, as soon as may be, prepare and transmit to the County Auditor a certified duplicate of the assessment roll, with each installment and interest on each unpaid assessment set forth separately, to be extended upon the proper tax lists of the County and the County Auditor shall thereafter collect said assessment in the manner provided by law. Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by the City Clerk. city ogo,aenl! ,I ,' MEMORANDUM valley Administrative Services Department 763-593-8013 1763-593-3969(fax) 11.5 Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley city council Meeting October 7, 2014 Agenda Item 4. E. Public Hearing- Special Assessments -2014 Delinquent Utility Bills- Minneapolis Prepared By Sue Virnig, Finance Director Summary The following resolution needs to be approved for certification of special assessments for delinquent utility bills that are billed from the City of Minneapolis. Attachments • List of delinquent Minneapolis utility bills for certification (1 page) • Resolution Adopting and Confirming Assessments for Delinquent Minneapolis Utility Billing (2 pages) Recommended Action Motion to adopt Resolution Adopting and Confirming Assessments for Delinquent Minneapolis Utility Billing. City of Golden Valley 2014 Delinquent Utilities-City of Minneapolis Levy 18865 Property ID Service Address Beg Bal Fee Pymt Cert Bal 17-029-24-24-0025 1931 XERXES AVE N 241.91 30.00 271.91 17-029-24-24-0026 1933 XERXES AVE N 641.11 30.00 671.11 17-029-24-31-0006 1715 XERXES AVE N 333.09 30.00 363.09 1,216.11 90.00 0.00 1,306.11 Resolution 14-82 October 7, 2014 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION ADOPTING AND CONFIRMING ASSESSMENTS FOR DELINQUENT UTILITY BILLING / CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS 1. The amount proper and necessary to be specially assessed at this time for various public improvements: Project Years Interest Rate First Year Levy Total Assessed 2014 Delinquent 1 5% 2015 $1,306.11 Utility Billing/MSP against every assessable lot, piece, or parcel of land affected thereby has been duly calculated upon the basis of benefits, without regard to cash valuation, in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and notice has been duly published, as required by law that this Council would meet to hear, consider and pass upon all objections, if any, and said proposed assessment has at all time since its filing been open for public inspection and an opportunity has been given to all interested persons to present their objections if any, to such proposed assessments. 2. This Council, having heard and considered all objections so presented, finds that each of the lots, pieces and parcels of land enumerated in the proposed assessment was and is specially benefited by the construction of said improvement in not less than the amount of the assessment set opposite the description of each such lot, piece and parcel of land respectively, and such amount so set out is hereby levied against each of the respective lots, pieces and parcels of land therein described. 3. The proposed assessments are hereby adopted and confirmed as the proper assessments for each of said lots, pieces and parcels of land respectively, and the assessment against each parcel, together with interest at the rate of five (5) percent per annum accruing on the full amount thereof unpaid, shall be a lien concurrent with general taxes upon parcel and all thereof. The total amount of each such assessment not prepaid shall be payable in equal annual principal installments extending over a period of years, as indicated in each case. The first of said installments, together with interest on the entire assessment for the period of January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015, will be payable with general taxes for the year of 2014, collectible in 2015. 4. Prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, the owner of any lot, piece or parcel of land assessed hereby may at any time pay the whole such assessment , with interest to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer, but no interest shall be charged if such payment is made by November 14, 2014. Resolution 14-82 - Continued October 7, 2014 5. The City Clerk shall, as soon as may be, prepare and transmit to the County Auditor a certified duplicate of the assessment roll, with each installment and interest on each unpaid assessment set forth separately, to be extended upon the proper tax lists of the County and the County Auditor shall thereafter collect said assessment in the manner provided by law. Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by the City Clerk. city 0 fgoldeni!itvr M E M 0 R A N D U M .�% d1% vidillcy Public Works Department 763-593-8030/763-593-3988(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting October 7, 2014 Agenda Item 6. A. Amendment to Chapter 3: Public Utilities of Golden Valley City Code Regarding the Addition of a Fats, Oils, and Grease Ordinance Prepared By Jeff Oliver, PE, City Engineer Bert Tracy, Public Works Maintenance Manager R.J. Kakach, EIT, Utility Engineer Summary Fats, Oils, and Grease (FOG) is defined as the buildup of greasy material in the sanitary sewer system, usually from animal or vegetable food sources that are discharged into a sink or floor drain. Over time,these discharges begin to build up on the interior walls of the sanitary sewer pipes, resulting in a decrease in capacity. These restrictions often result in sewer blockages and backups. In an attempt to minimize these issues, staff currently spends hundreds of hours cleaning and jetting the sewer lines in the City each year. A cost breakdown of the cleaning and jetting indicates City resources in excess of$114,000 per year go into this additional maintenance. In some extreme cases, specific lines are cleaned as often as once per week. In an ideal situation with the proper grease separation devices in place, these lines would only need to be cleaned every three years. The additional maintenance effort consumes City resources which could be better utilized on other utility maintenance issues. In addition to the maintenance concerns, the Golden Valley City Code does not currently require the removal of FOG necessary to meet local Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) and national Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) standards. Both MCES 406.04 and 406.05 and EPA National Pretreatment Program (40 CFR 403.5(b)(3)) rules specifically prohibit the discharge of"solid or viscous pollutants in amounts which will cause obstruction" into the wastewater collection system. More specifically, MCES defines FOG as a concern when it exceeds 100 milligrams per liter as a solution. To properly address the issue of FOG discharge into the public sanitary sewer system, staff has drafted an ordinance to achieve proper removal and disposal of FOG. There are 109 licensed food service providers in the City of Golden Valley. About half of these facilities are restaurants that produce FOG. Some of these restaurants already have grease traps or interceptors installed; however, many do not. In addition to requiring restaurants to have the necessary equipment in place, this ordinance also requires each restaurant to be accountable for proper cleaning and maintenance of its equipment to ensure that it continues to work effectively. To ensure this accountability, each restaurant would be required to submit annual maintenance logs to the City for review. Consideration for non-restaurant food service providers would be evaluated once all restaurants have complied. Attachments • Proposed Ordinance Amending City Code Chapters 3.32, Discharge of Fats, Oils and Grease (FOG) and Section 3.01 Definitions. (4 pages) Recommended Action Motion to adopt Ordinance # 531, City of Golden Valley Ordinance Amending Section 3.01 and 3.32 of the City Code upon first consideration. ORDINANCE NO. 531, 2ND SERIES AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE Adding a New Section 3.32: Discharge of Fats, Oils, and Grease (FOG) and Amending Section 3.01: Definitions The City Council for the City of Golden Valley hereby ordains: Section 1. Chapter 3 of the Golden Valley City Code is hereby amended include a new Section 3.32 to read in its entirety as follows: Section 3.32: Discharge of Fats, Oils, and Grease (FOG) Subdivision 1. Installation Any existing, new, renovated, or expanded Food Service Facility must install a Grease Interceptor/Trap upon notice by the City that it has been determined that the Fat, Oil and Grease discharge from such Food Service Facility significantly impacts the City sewer system requiring undue additional maintenance. Upon notification, the Food Service Facility shall have a period of time stated in the notice, not exceeding one (1) calendar year, to install the Grease Interceptor/Trap. Subdivision 2. Design All Grease Interceptors/Traps must be designed and installed in accordance with the State of Minnesota Plumbing Code (MN Rule 4715) and the Hennepin County Environmental Health Department. Subdivision 3. Location All Grease Interceptors/Traps shall be located as to be readily and easily accessible for cleaning and inspection. Subdivision 4. Annual Maintenance Record By April 1 of each year, Food Service Facilities with Grease Interceptors/Traps must submit annual maintenance records to the City on a form that is provided by the City. The City may also perform periodic inspections of Food Service Facilities to ensure that Grease Interceptors/Traps are being properly maintained by each Food Service Facility. Subdivision S. Installation and Maintenance Policy and Procedures The City shall maintain an Installation and Maintenance Policy and Procedures which will document specific requirements of this Section. This policy will be available to each Food Service Facility at the City. Subdivision 6. Additional Control Measures The City reserves the right to require additional control measures if existing Grease Interceptors/Traps are determined to be insufficient to protect the wastewater collection system from interference due to the discharge of FOG from the Food Service Facility. Section 2. City Code Section 3.01 is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows (struck text deleted, underlined text added): Section 3.01: De 1nitionS As used in this Chapter, the following words and terms shall have the meanings stated: 1. Clean Clear Water: is any surface flow, run off, and drainage that does not contain any hazardous substance or sewage. This includes but is not limited to NPDES permitted discharges, storm water and water from foundation and footing drains and basement or other sump pumps. 2. Consumer and Customer: mean any user of a utility. 3. Draintile: means a subsurface drainage and conveyance system of clear water and groundwater into the storm sewer system. 4. Food Service Facility: means any facility containing an operation that prepares, packages, serves, vends or otherwise provides food or which disposes of food related wastes. Food service facility does not include single or multi-family residential facilities, but does include institutional facilities and other facilities designated by the City Manager or his/her designee, as a facility that discharges enough FOG to have a significant impact on the City's Sanitary Sewer System 5. Fats, Oils and Grease or FOG: means material composed primarily of fats, oils and grease from animal or vegetable sources 6. Grease Interceptor/Trap: means a City-approved device for separating and retaining waterborne FOG prior to wastewater exiting the interceptor and entering the sanitary sewer collection and treatment system 7. Infiltration: is an indirect connection of clear water into the sanitary sewer system. 8-5. Inflow: is any direct connection of clear water into the sanitary sewer system. 96. Interceptor Sewer: means that portion of the sanitary sewer system that extends outside of the City of Golden Valley and is owned, operated and maintained by the Metropolitan Council. 10-7. Inspector: means any peFsen duly autheFized by the City Manager or his her designee, . 118. Joint Water Commission ()WC): means the commission established through a joint powers agreement between the cities of Golden Valley, Crystal and New Hope to provide potable water to customers in the three cities. 129. Minneapolis Water Works (MWW): means a municipal water system owned and operated by the City of Minneapolis. 13-1$. Municipal Utility: means any city-owned utility system, including, but not limited to water, sanitary sewer and storm sewer service. 1444. Owner: means the person or entity that owns or holds the title of a property served by a municipal utility. 1542. Sanitary Sewer System: includes all street lateral, main and intersecting sewers and structures by which sewage or industrial wastes are collected, transported, treated and disposed of; provided that this shall not include plumbing inside or a part of a building or premises served, or service sewers from a building to the sanitary sewer main. 164. Service: means providing a particular utility to a customer or consumer. 174. Sewage: means water-carried waste products from residences, public buildings, institutions or other buildings or premises, including the excrement or other discharge from the bodies of human beings or animals. 18-15. Sewer Service Lateral or Service Lateral: means that portion of the sanitary sewer system that generally is perpendicular to the sewer main and extends from the sewer main to the structure being served. 1946. Sewer Main: means that portion of the sanitary sewer system that is owned, operated and maintained by the City. The City portion of the sanitary sewer system is typically within street rights-of-way or easements. 2044. Storm Sewer: means a subsurface drainage facility that conveys storm water runoff and snow melt runoff into surface water bodies. 218. Sump Pump Inspection: means a visual examination of a sump pit and the pump and discharge piping designed to remove liquids therefrom. 2249. Trunk Water Main: means water mains larger than twelve (12) inches in diameter that distribute water throughout the distribution system and are owned by the Joint Water Commission and maintained by the City. 232-9. Utility: means all utility services, whether public, city-owned facilities, or furnished by public utility companies. 242-1. Water Main: means that portion of the potable water distribution system that is twelve (12) inches in diameter and smaller, and is owned, operated and maintained by the City. 252-2-. Water Service: means that portion of the potable water system that is generally perpendicular to the water main that extends from the water main to the structure or group of structures being served. Section 3. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 3.99 of City Code entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 4. This Ordinance shall take effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law. Adopted by the City Council this 21 st day of October, 2014. /s/Shepard M. Harris Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: /s/Kristine A. Luedke Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk