Loading...
03-09-15 PC AgendaAGENDA Planning Commission Regular Meeting Golden Valley City Hall, 7800 Golden Valley Road Council Chambers Monday, March 9, 2015 7 pm 1. Approval of Minutes February 23, 2015, Regular Planning Commission Meeting 2. Informal Public Hearing — Final PUD Plan — Central Park West — Southwest Quadrant of 1-394 and Highway 100 — PU-121 Applicant: DLC Residential, LLC Address: Southwest Quadrant of 1-394 and Highway 100 Purpose: To allow two six -story multiple family residential buildings, a six -story hotel, two 11 -story office buildings, a parking ramp and a linear park in both St. Louis Park and Golden Valley. 3. Informal Public Hearing — Zoning Code Text Amendment — Size of Accessory Structures — Z000-97 Applicant: City of Golden Valley Purpose: To consider amending language in the Zoning Code in order to match the State Building Code regarding the size of accessory structures allowed before a building permit is required. --Short Recess -- 4. Discuss hotel parking requirements S. Discuss the current Zoning Code requirement regarding side yard setbacks increasing with the height of a house 6. Reports on Meetings of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority, City Council, Board of Zoning Appeals and other Meetings 7. Other Business • Council Liaison Report 8. Adjournment This document is available in alternate formats upon a 72 -hour request. Please call 763-593-8006 (TTY: 763-593-3968) to make a request. Fxamples of alternate formats may include large print, electronic, Braille, audiocassette, etc. Regular Meeting of the Golden Valley Planning Commission February 23, 2015 A regular meeting of the Planning Commission was held at the Golden Valley City Hall, Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota, on Monday, February 23, 2015. Chair Kluchka called the meeting to order at 7 pm. Those present were Planning Commissioners Baker, Blum, Cera, Johnson 1 Kt�chka, Segelbaum, and Waldhauser. Also present was Planning Manager Ja en Zimmerman, Associate Planner/Grant Writer Emily Goellner, and Administrative ss►�nt Lisa Wittman. 1. Approval of Minutes February 9, 2015, Regular Planning Comm ission �Meetin' Waldhauser referred to the third paragraph on page fou and aske"d that discussion regarding access to the west of the Sweeney Lake Woods proposal be clarified. Baker referred to the fifth paragraph on Page five and asked'that the word "not" be removed from the fourth sentence. MOVED by Segelbaum, secondediby GeraOd motion carried unanimously to approve the February 9, 2015, minutes with the 4 ove'noted changes. 2. Informal Public Hearing r�� Final,,PUD Plan — Struthers Parkinson's Center — 6701 Country Club QriVe'- PU-3, Amendment #4 Applicant: Dark is icollet Address:570141Country Club Drive Purpose: T °a low a building addition approximately 2,700 square feet in size and the construction of an outdoor memory care walk/garden. Goellbr statethat the Applicant is seeking approval to amend their existing PUD in order to panel the Struthers Parkinson's Center. She explained that the project consists ofenovating 5,535 square feet to expand their rehabilitation program services, building a 2,680 square feet addition to create a gathering space and expand their education and training capabilities, and creating an indoor/outdoor movement therapy garden with enhanced landscaping and artwork. Goellner referred to the parking requirements and explained that 160 spaces are required. Currently, there are 182 spaces on the property and the proposed plans show 163 spaces. She added that no proof of parking is required and that an agreement for maintenance, insurance and shared parking is suggested as a condition of approval. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission February 23, 2015 Page 2 Goellner stated that Staff is recommending approval of the Final PUD Plan subject to the conditions recommended in the Staff reports. Segelbaum asked about changes between the Preliminary Plan and the Final Plan. Goellner said there was a slight change in the square footage of the proposed addition. Baker asked if the shared parking agreement was discussed during the Preliminary Plan review. Goellner said yes. She stated that the access easement is perpetual but the maintenance and the shared parking agreements have expired and need to be re- established. Rose Wichmann, Manager of the Struthers Parkinson's Centeir said s'hle fe'64s,th they have met all of the requirements and noted that the share6parlki ig and maintenance agreement is under way. Kluchka asked Wichmann about the timing of their gonstrdbtiom.1 /ichm" nn said they want to start construction as soon as the frost core odt Qf thernd. Kluchka opened the public hearing. Seeing and Hi aring no tine wishing to comment, o Kluchka closed the public hearing. Waldhauser said this is a good plan that meets the City's requirements and is favorable to the City and the surrounding area. Segelbaum agreed. Goellner added that the Applicant has added a design plan per the Planning Commissions' request. MOVED by Baker, seconded by Blumand motion carried unanimously to recommend approval of the Final PUDFlan ft'i Struthers Parkinson's Center PUD No. 39, Amendment No. 4, subject fbth ib following findings and conditions: Findings: 1. The PUD pl6n1,fs tar)ared toile specific characteristics of the site and achieves a higher,quo site planning and design than generally expected under conventional provlsior s o Ithe ordinance. 2. The PiDI n preserves and protects substantial desirable portions of the site's Icharacterlstics open space and sensitive environmental features including steep slopes, tree, scenic views, creeks, wetlands, and open waters. 3. The�PUD pian includes efficient and effective use (which includes preservation) of the land. 4. The PUD Plan results in development compatible with adjacent uses and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and redevelopment plans and goals. 5. The PUD plan is consistent with preserving and improving the general health, safety and general welfare of the people of the City. 6. The PUD plan meets the PUD Intent and Purpose provision and all other PUD ordinance provisions. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission February 23, 2015 Page 3 Conditions: 1. The plans prepared by EAPC and Larson Engineering, Inc. submitted with the application dated February 6, 2015, shall become a part of this approval. 2. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Fire Department to Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager, dated December 1, 2014, shall become a part of this approval. 3. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Engineering Division to Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager, dated December 1, 2014, shall become a part of this approval. 4. A reciprocal cross easement agreement shall be signed by pro owno within pY PUD. No. 39 and reviewed by the City Attorney at the time of Fin 'LPUD app oval. The agreement shall be recorded with Hennepin County up9n'Finar�i?UD approval. 5. The Applicant shall submit a lighting plan that meets the requirementsof the City's Outdoor Lighting Code (Section 11.73). 6. All signage must meet the requirements of the City's Sign Code, (Section 4.20). 7. This approval is subject to all other state, federal, and local ordinances, regulations, or laws with authority over this developrriernt. 8. A final design plan shall be reviewed by the City prior to 'Firs l.Plan approval. 3. Informal Public Hearing — Zoning ndiSubwisic Moratorium Study of Subdivis ams and? Plann#d`U e_ Single Family Residential Cpmpe nehi - 000-96 Applicant: City of Golden, Valley,;' Ordinance Amendments — nit Developments with Purpose: To consider adding/amending language in the Zoning Code and Subdivision Code regarding Subdivision requirements. Zimmerman reminded the Commission of the six-month moratorium placed on subdivisions and PUDs with a single family residential component. He stated that the City Council directed"I tall to: Ludy fh`e following: increasing the minimum lot area requirement, improving #andarcla;forpreserving green space, minimizing irregular shaped lots, preserving riejgghborhb6d character, and limiting the use of small residential PUDs. He added tht,the pity Council is considering implementing a Construction Management Agreement 'that Mll address complaints arising as part of the construction process such as mise, runoff, emergency access, etc. separate from the subdivision study. Zimmerman stated that there are several issues that were discussed as part of the study for which no action is recommended including: building height, housing styles, quality of construction, house spacing, and street/traffic impacts. Some of the issues recommended for further study in the future include: enhanced tree preservation regulations with landscaping requirements, stormwater drainage and flooding, neighborhood character preservation and sustainability. Zimmerman discussed the proposed changes to the Subdivision Code. He explained that the minimum lot area requirement would have two tiers — 10,000 or 15,000 based on the Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission February 23, 2015 Page 4 average size of the lots surrounding the subject property. The threshold for the larger minimum lot area requirement would be an average of 18,000 for all R-1 properties within 250 feet of the subject property and would apply to all R-1 lots created through subdivision after 2014. Lots less than 4,000 square feet would be excluded from the calculation. Zimmerman explained that these proposed changes would be made in the Subdivision section of City Code to prevent the creation of numerous non -conforming lots. Another change proposed in the Subdivision Code would be to require the minimAtattAot width to remain the same between 35 feet and 70 feet from the front lot line. Tip wouio fetter preserve a sufficient area within a lot at the likely location of the building.Pad andwould limit narrowing in the front portion of a lot where a house would lik, ff be tuilt. Also; the submission of an existing tree survey will be required when applying fora NI or"' Subdivision. This will help in better understanding the site condifions�when reviewing subdivision applications. He added that a final tree preservation plan would=rbmain as an administrative review as part of the stormwater management plan. Other'61hanges to the Tree Preservation Ordinance will happen separately,in theJoturo Zimmerman referred to the proposed changes in the Zoning Code. He explained that new definitions are being proposed for front, side and rear lot lines in order to help clarify setbacks for irregular shaped lots. Also, in -Girder to reduce confusion regarding measuring lot depth, the rear yard setback would change from 20% of the lot depth to 25 feet. This will also provide consistency with other setbacks wh iph are specific numbers and not percentages. He added that these onr g Code changes may create some non - conformities with respect to existing strvuresl. Zimmerman referred to theproped ghanges for the PUD section of the Zoning Code. He explained that reside n t PU 's must have a minimum area of two acres unless they can demonstrate unusual plial features of the property, are directly adjacent to or across aright -of -way w ha�een developed previously as a PUD and will function as an extension to,an exia#in� ' ID, `or is located in a transitional area between different land use categories. Kluchka:askedbout the {process for making the proposed changes. Zimmerman stated that the Planning, ComImission's recommendation will go to the City Council for coy"ideratior Hddded that the changes in the Zoning Code require one hearing at City Codicil, and that the changes in the Subdivision Code require two hearings. Segelbaum asked if the sepond hearing means that there are two hearings before the Planning Commiss�jo6and the City Council. Zimmerman said no, the two hearings for the Subdivision Code are just at the City Council. Segelbaum asked about significant changes since the last time they reviewed the proposed new language. Zimmerman said the rear lot line language is new. Waldhauser said she thought the shorter side of a corner lot would be the only front. Zimmerman said that City Code currently states that corner lots have two fronts and that the lot line opposite the narrower front is the rear. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission February 23, 2015 Page 5 Kluchka asked if there is an impact to the lot width definition if there are two fronts. Zimmerman said the lot would have to meet the width requirement on both fronts. Baker asked if the change to the rear lot line is the only one that will result in non- conforming properties. Zimmerman said yes. Baker asked why that can't be avoided. Zimmerman stated that the Subdivision Code applies to all of the zoning districts and the new lot line change is for R-1 only. Kluchka asked why the proposed changes aren't being made in all of the zoning districts in order to avoid non-conformance. Zimmerman said he would research the advantages of moving the requirements to the Subdivision Code. Waldhauser asked about the exclusion of parcels under 4,000 square feet when considering the minimum lot area. She questioned why the prosed,langu'a€ge Doesn't exclude any parcel under 10,000 square feet. Zimmerman state4 that here are'existing lots that are less than 10,000 square feet in size with homes �n they. Baler"asked how many lots there are that are less than 4,000 square fee`t,,Zimm fman`sar4'there are a few, most are left over right-of-way or remnants that woudlust bring down the average. Baker noted that someone could acquire a 4,000 s�u6�re�#pot lot,: mid it to their existing lot and then subdivide. Zimmerman agreed. Cera asked if there is anything built on any of the 4,000 square foot lots. Zimmerman said he didn't believe so. Blum asked if by using the formula to determine which lots have to meet the new minimum lot size requirements it is possible that it could become non -conforming over time, or if the lot sizes around that,parcel change and become smaller or larger if it would then become non -conforming. Zimmerman said,,that would be unlikely because as there are more small lots the average, cores down so the minimum lot size would be 10,000 square feet. Kluchka asked if the,pew tre4 preservation requirements would only affect people proposing a subdivisibmor;if it wpuld apply to everyone. Zimmerman said the current language being proposed Wbu'Id only apply to new subdivision proposals. He reiterated that the tree pre�ervatit t�requirements will be discussed more in the future. Kluchka refrot0 �ewwners of property that may be affected by these proposed changes d 'domed how'they have been notified. Zimmerman stated that there has been a l01 of pubhl gty In the SunPost newspaper and in the City's newsletter, a post card was sent,to every onrnerrof a single family property, the consultants have sent emails to everyone who signed up to receive information, and information has been on the City's Facebookpage. Kluchka opened the public hearing Mae Held, 5001 Colonial Drive, said her property is three acres in size. She said she came to one of the listening meetings to find out that no one cares about the landowner. She said it is not her responsibility as a homeowner to provide green space for her neighbors and she is going to be impacted by the proposed changes because she will be restricted by the same ordinances as someone with a '/4 acre lot. She said the City is Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission February 23, 2015 Page 6 saying maintain your property, pay your taxes, and we'll decide what you can do with it. She said they are taxed on a fully divisible property and if they can only remove 20% of their trees that would mean 2/3 of their property is unbuildable. She said she thinks she needs it reflected in her taxes if her lot is unbuildable and if her property is not developable that reduces the value. She said she really hopes the City cares about the landowner and not just people who want her green space but don't pay her taxes or maintain her property. Randy Anderson, 5645 Lindsay Street, said there has been a subdivision rear him that was divided in a way he was not aware of. He referred to the statemeafirnad&about not being able to dictate the quality of housing, but affordable housing nearbis house: concerns him. He said another thing that concerns him is what could happen with the leftover MnDOT properties from the Highway 100 project. He questioned if new homeowners would be required to put in new trees. He added that he is concerned about the roofs of the new homes near him being on top of the sound wall'. Peter Ralph, 1421 Rhode Island Avenue North, said he re --built hfs house about six years ago with the intent of meeting the requirements fora fUtuire su iivision. He referred to the proposed new requirement regarding the size offots that "(e within 250 feet and asked if that measurement would be from the edge of a loti,or the cuter of a lot. He referred to the proposed language requiring that lots,,b680feet io wide for a distance of 70 feet and asked if there will be an option for variances bemuse'h'inks he would be off by about three inches. He said he wants to know what) needs to do to pursue a subdivision and said there should be provisions for unique circumstances. Steve Shapiro, 219 Meadow1ene"North, said he sent letters to the City talking about subdivisions as being a corn field concept and not something that should be an independent kind of activity,that takesplace in a built up urban environment like Golden Valley. He said all these projects that they've been talking about, on whatever scale, are really developments,arrd,the neighbors and the City should want to know who is going to build them, what they are O6`Jng to 'look like, how are they going to stage construction, etc. He said the subdivision.at'Glenwood and Meadow Lane where they took one house and made it intoJour is 'adevelopment. He said 200 Meadow Lane is a much smaller site and they areoirg tc �stufffhre houses on there and they have no idea what it is going to look like',`h,qw"itiils goinglo be staged, or the quality of construction. He referred to Ms. Held's comim�nt�,tegarding her three acre lot and said even under the most generous reall©cation of1and 'site you're talking about 9 or 10 houses, and that is certainly a development and people in the neighborhood would certainly want to know who is going to build it ah&how it is going to look. He said he urges the City to consider, after it determines the requirements of the Subdivision ordinance, that it is made incidental to construction, and in order to carry out a project they would need curb cuts, subdivision, grading permits, to be considered one of the aspects of development, not just the raw land notion that you are going to carve up a site into however many parcels and pray that it gets done right because the City would be putting too much trust in the people that are splitting up the land because they aren't the ones that are developing it. He referred to the proposal on 200 Meadow Lane and said he contacted the City about the "tree trust" around the perimeter of the property that was promised. Under the current subdivision Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission February 23, 2015 Page 7 requirements the City can't require anything like that. So even though the applicant said they would do a perimeter easement to protect the trees for the neighbors, the City can't require it, so it won't be done. He said he urges the City to consider subdivisions not as a pure raw activity, but as an incidental to a much more intensive review of developments in the City. Paul Meland, 309 Meander, said he has seen a lot of change. He said he purchased his home because he knew it would be a good place to raise his kids. He said the sales packet when he bought his house showed that there is another lot as pertipf.his. He doesn't have plans to subdivide his property, but the 10 homes beingei"tstruct0d in the neighborhood are going to have a huge impact. He said putting restrictions on lo't'"size is going to impact him financially. He said the change has already 4810pened and h(j�s in favor of preserving character, but he is not in favor of his invest lent being ftp ''ted. Peter Knaeble, 6001 Glenwood Avenue, said he supports what Mr. M'elandtaid. He stated that if a property is under 30,000 square feet in size in a neighbprhood with larger lots, under this new proposal it won't be able to be subdivided. He said 'that, along with the issue of fairness and takings, needs to be taken into consideration. He said another thing that needs to be considered in regard to the average lot size 'issue is whether the City uses a mean or a median to figure the average lot size. He recommended using the median instead of the mean because it throws out'the high .ones and the low ones and won't skew the average. He added thataie buitdable poftion of properties should also be considered because some of the larger p ttpo 16ttPave a wetland or something that impacts the buildable area. Matt Pavek, 510 Cloverleaf Date, �sajd tie has attended every meeting on this topic. He said he works a lot with landowners nd it is interesting that three people in this public hearing have talked about'how these proposed changes will impact them economically because they won't able'10i,tbbdivide their lot when they could before. He stated that the rules requiring 1'6, 0 squar ,feet with 80 feet of width have been in place for 35 m years and that is sothingt'pecpte have planned their entire lives around. He said that lots sell from $15 ,000'tt`$35b;,&00. So, if someone can't subdivide a lot that they thought could, they could lose afife changing amount of money because their home will go down in value He idthis, needs to be weighed against the concerns of trying to blend in with the neighWrh60 and it� hasn't really been discussed in all of the meetings he's attended. He said the encerns are valid, but they can't possibly trump a person's retirement account, college fund or nest egg. He added that it might not legally be considered a taking;but it would feel like a taking so maybe the City and its residents should pay these people wh6ten no longer subdivide their property. Bob Lang, 401 Meadow Lane North, said he is a proponent of larger lot sizes in particular areas. He said it doesn't make it right that lot sizes have been the same since the 1980s and what has been recommended is a move in the right direction and the right thing. He said maybe the people who think they can subdivide need to come forward and see what can be done. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission February 23, 2015 Page 8 Leroy Hagel, 200 Cutacross Road, said he has written many letters to the City Council and he is anti -subdivision in Tralee. He said standing before an impressive tribunal ready to pounce on their prey is intimidating, but the stakes are high so he wants to state his view. He said he received a letter from the property owner across the street when they subdivided their property and he wishes to avoid hard feelings, but there are just different goals and divergent views of the situation at hand. He said he is a dissenter who is open to ridicule in a very public way as opposed to a developer, speculator, or promoter. When they want something it is a rosy picture subject to accolades. He said he is opposed to any subdivision of any lots in Tralee because Tralee is a heritage, is different,, it stands out, and is a tax generator. He said in the future, the discerning buyer willraze�the old house on their property to build high end houses matching the real estates' chardpter and value netting tax revenue to rival the tax take from subdividing np 'if the ity world just wait longer. He said the City will have saved what is left of Trade, a urfiq ueert+e worth saving with less hassle over new lots, etc. He said the City con �peeplent uOU cid` disgruntled owners to deal with when subdividing, and he world expect mot,,b expense to the City also. He referred to the siting of two new houses,.across.the street from him and said they appear to be the result of some clever, mgenious;�surveying similar to fitting a puzzle piece in a puzzle game; they sit forward an,,168o not line a aWth existing houses next door. He said he had family come to visit and the first words out of their mouths were what's with the houses on the road and what did he think about them. He said he was taken aback by their comments and said trouble is inherent fn subdividing. He invited the City to do it right and judge for themselves their first impression. He said he remains hopeful that subdivisions will be halted in Tratee. Diane Richard, 217 Paisley Lane, said she would like to preserve the larger lots in her neighborhood where the avere lot Ize is about 30,000 square feet. She said she knows this is a politically ct rgedtopto­,with people for and against. She said she hasn't heard a lot about the Comprehensive Plan and the vision for Golden Valley and said her discussions, decisions, and"befiefs come from the Comprehensive Plan. She said if the sustainability discusspon_is being postponed this might be putting the cart before the horse. She said she loges ne�`hborhood and it is unique to any other area in Golden Valley. She stated thane property next door to her is removing 20 oak trees, but there has beenrrtenttrt of removing any buckthorn. She questioned why that isn't being addressid $he re t r t f that they have a unique neighborhood and that the concept of having olf�reht neighborhoods is okay. Maek�Qietz, 20Sunnyridge Lane, said there are two sides and it's a very difficult decision to listen to all the arguments in terms of the impacts to the people who have larger lots and the imp4df to the surrounding neighbors and why they moved there. He said it is not urban planning here and what he wants to see Golden Valley really be like. Seeing and hearing no one else wishing to comment, Kluchka closed the public hearing. Kluchka referred to the questions about tree preservation and taxable property and asked if that issue has been discussed. Zimmerman said he has spoken with the County Assessor regarding Ms. Held's property. He explained that the taxes assessed are not just based on the property's ability to be subdivided, there are other issues as well, such Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission February 23, 2015 Page 9 as size, terrain, wooded areas, etc. but there aren't any additional taxes levied because it may be subdivided. He said there are assessments based on whether the property can be subdivided, but those are always deferred until a subdivision actually takes place. Zimmerman referred to Ms. Held's question about this proposal limiting the number of trees that could be removed or make her land undevelopable. He said the answer is no, 20% of the trees can be removed. If more trees than that are removed there is a mitigation process and it doesn't mean that the land can't be subdivided. Cera said Ms. Held's property is beautiful and he doesn't see any issues with it being able to be subdivided. Blum asked if the nature of the ability to subdivide a particular lot change's'' if the deferred assessment would also change to reflect that. Zimmerman said yes, it would. Deferred assessments would be payable if the property is subdivided. Kluckha referred to the questions regarding quality con'struction', and askedI how that can be controlled. Zimmerman said it comes down to the Ruil`rtgaCei*ie. He`said the City doesn't dictate the style of houses, or what price they ate soId"at ,,',T,,he City controls safety and code compliance. Kluchka referred to the questions of state-,'6wried rant„lots counting in the square footage when figuring lot area. Zimmerrt n sa ldAhey w did not count because they are not zoned R-1 Single Family resideptia,l, They_ re n dered right-of-way. Kluchka asked if property owne4will have to plant trees with the new subdivision requirements. Zimmerman sid,heywon't have to, and that the requirements are considering trees that are removOd. if there are new landscaping requirements approved in the future that will likely'be dissrussed; Kluchka asked how the 250 radius around a proposed subdivision is drawn. Zimmerman said it would be,drawnJrom,,,Ahe,edge of the subject property and would follow the perimeter of the I Cera,asked `"if the subject property itself counts in the average lot size determination, ZimrnermOn said no, the 250 foot radius would be considering the context of the Its aioiindtt, forastated that counting the subject parcel would raise the average. Kluchka as d what a homeowner will need to do to follow these proposed rules. Zimm, i'erman s jd the average homeowner won't know the average lot size within 250 feet of theirpropery, but it will be fairly simple for staff to provide that information. Kluchka asked Zimmerman to review the front yard setback changes. Zimmerman explained that the current Subdivision Code requires lots to be 80 feet wide at the front yard setback line. The proposed new language states that the width of the lot has to remain 80 feet wide for a distance of 70 feet back from the front setback line. Kluchka asked what kinds of variances are available. Zimmerman said variances aren't allowed from the Subdivision Code, but applicants may be able to round up to the next whole foot as stated in the Zoning Code. Segelbaum said he thinks there is some confusion Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission February 23, 2015 Page 10 regarding variances being allowed or not in subdivision proposals. He asked for some clarification regarding variances when this item goes to the City Council. Kluchka asked about the differences between median, mean, and average. Zimmerman said he couldn't recall why the consultants recommended using the mean to figure the minimum lot size. He said he would follow up with them and get some clarification. Baker said he would like to see illustrated examples analyzed using mean and median. Kluchka asked if non -buildable land, or wetland areas are being excluded inothe calculations. Zimmerman stated that everything on a lot would count tq�ard iis,,Jot area and that wetland delineation would need to be done in some cases- Bauer asked this is really an issue and if there are large areas of unbuildable property. 'Waldhauser sayd there have been cases where parts of lots were unbuildable. Kluchka said that could be a cause for a variance. Cera noted that a wetland is a positive amenity for a property. Baker stated that in terms of calculating using mean or average, if the goall is to preserve similar sized lots, they need to consider how those types of lots affect that. Kluchka questioned if new subdivision rules should, be, considared'tor people who already own subdividable lots, or if those lots should be grandfatheired. Waldhauser asked about people who bought lots before the 1980s when the requirement was for larger sized lots and noted that those properties weren't abdfathdred. Kluchka referred to the question about buckthorn Zimmerman said that could be addressed in the larger tree presetvat[dh/landscaping discussions. Segelbaum asked how the propose ,, rew language meets what is stated in the Comprehensive Plan. Baker saidthaf Is a rhetorical question because the City is in the midst of a subdivision study,yanclit a issues have to be addressed now. Waldhauser added that this study, and sob'`of the recommendations that have been made are in response to the CoM'Ote ensiv&,Flan already in place. Baker said they've engaged the community as a result_of this:stpd� and hopefully, people will be engaged in the Comprehensive (flan ahi6hdment process. Kluchka asked"tttl C©mission should look at the results of median vs. mean. Johnson said theOee&dl'scuss the pros and cons and not just look at the results of the two. Johnson saic[the median accommodates outliers better. Cera said that median seems to be abetter reflection because one large lot could change the average. Johnson said that is not true, and t depends on what they want to accomplish. Kluchka questioned if the issue needtfo be better researched. Zimmerman noted that 90% of the lots estimated to be subdividable are under 50,000 square feet. Segelbaum stated that the consultants gave a reason why they went with mean and not median. He said if the average lot size is 18,000 square feet, then the new lots have to be 15,000 square feet in size, so there is a balance. He said he thinks they would get the same result in many instances using median or mean. Baker said his preference would be to recommend that both options are brought to the City Council with some analysis and background information. Cera questioned what would be a better reflection of a neighborhood, the mean or median. Waldhauser said if the City is trying to preserve the look or feel of a neighborhood she Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission February 23, 2015 Page 11 thinks the median would reflect that better. Segelbaum said if they use median instead of mean it could potentially allow many more subdivisions. Kluchka said the intent is not clear, but it sounds like using median is the more appropriate approach. Kluchka asked the Commissioners what they think about the proposed lot size changes. Baker said he thinks the City Council has chosen to undertake this study for a reason and if it was solely to make a few people happy they wouldn't have done it. He said he thinks the consultant's recommendation is a good one. Segelbaum agreed. He added that a few non -conforming properties may be created, but it is a nice compromise. Blum said it seems that there is a legitimate interest in housing diversityJn GoldeValley which they've heard from a lot of people, and these changes will wive th�,interest He referred to one of the goals in the Comprehensive Plan which i'to pro,t;ct 60,0 traditional neighborhoods and this change reflects that goal, pa'i of Bich is rY�eking sure properties don't get subdivided down to the smallest lots pos'!§4 Cera said there is a law of unintended consequences. He'sald he thinks in a year or two there will be a different group of people with different problems such as "McMansions" and lots being overbuilt. He said they also need to address the zoning and building issues such as where a house can built, the coverage, the impervious surface, the building pad, etc, because people could potentially build ai 12,000 square foot home. He said they are not necessarily addressing the right thing. Baker said this is not a perfect solution, but it is a good one. He said he doesn't think they are going to see 12,000 square foot homes because if someone has the money to build at 12,000 square foot home they are not going to build it a dense residential, neig borh6o , they are going to build it in Wayzata or Minnetonka, so he is not cotnpejle Oylllthat argument. Kluchka said he agrees that the roposed recommendations are an interesting compromise, however he has ncerns in three areas. The first is how homeowners were notified, the second is that this is,potentially a financial taking. He said he feels strongly that 140 property owners n660,to be clearly notified that their property's sale value could be reduced. He said the,City hasn't been clear and forthcoming with the effect this will have. He said his last concern is, as much as he wants his neighborhood to stay the same, or aslmuefi he Wants Golden Valley and traditional neighborhoods to stay the same, st ying the sarri ''costs everybody more money because asphalt, labor and pipes cost more, i they;will see with the sewer crisis. He added that unless they find the right places for desit y, the costs are going to keep coming to the City and everybody will have to pay' *re tq ;fie City if density isn't allowed to happen. Cera asked if they are going to vote on the recommendations individually or as a group. Kluchka said he would like to separate the recommendations. Baker said they should be careful about throwing around the number of 140 homeowners being affected by this because they won't all be impacted. Kluchka said 50% of them will be adversely impacted according to the study. He reiterated that they haven't been forthright in their communicating. Baker referred to the implications made about the tax base and said as long as the City is continuing to do things like what's being done along Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission February 23, 2015 Page 12 Pennsylvania Avenue, the City is not going to have to grapple with the kind of issues that have been raised because things are being done in other parts of the City to raise the tax base. Blum agreed that there needs to be density and growth in the right places, but he doesn't think these proposed changes will have negative impacts because the changes are narrowly tailored to subdivisions. He added that he doesn't think the City needs to notify people that the value of their land may change over time as the law changes. There are inherent risks in real estate and the City doesn't need to guarantee a return on any investments people make. Johnson said his concern is the tree survey requirement because there is a wiryaround it. It could force people to make decisions about their trees before they choose subdivide their property. He added that it doesn't seem to be in sync with the other proposed requirements. MOVED by Cera to recommend using the median when determining the average lot size. Kluchka said he was looking for a recommendation to approvethat, bot,,wonted to discuss the issue of minimum lot size. MOVED by Segelbaum, and seconded by Baker tto reconiM end the suggested change to the definition of minimum lot size, as it is recom*nded wh'1h is based on the average lot size of properties within 250 feet. Cera proposed that the median be used When ig'urdng the average. He stated that he did some math using 6 lots and 7 lots:abd' here could be a big difference between using the average and using the median eaecialli when=there is one big lot in the equation. Kluchka asked if anyone Mould fide t61 econd the motion to add median as a recommended metric. Segelbaum said he would prefer it be studied further, Kluchka agreed it should be eyiewed Cher. There was no second. Kluchka said the motion o0!t e table is to recommend that the minimum lot area definition as proposed, be tecorrimeodec `to the Council. The motion carried 5 to 2. Cera and Kluchka voted no. Kluchka 'referred to the recommendations regarding tree preservation and the idea that there needs to be an existing tree survey created at the time subdivision. He referred to the issue brought up that trees could be cut down before a survey was created in order to get ardond the;' equirements. Segelbaum said he thinks it is an investment to cut trees down and°§peculative of the applicant when they don't know if their subdivision will be approved or not, so he doesn't think is very likely to happen. He added there will be a benefit in having a tree survey when reviewing subdivision proposals. Baker reiterated that there will be more work done in the future regarding tree preservation. Blum added that the tree survey requirement will have a direct relationship towards greater transparency. MOVED by Segelbaum, seconded by Blum and motion carried unanimously to recommend approval of requiring the submittal of an existing tree survey when applying Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission February 23, 2015 Page 13 for a subdivision. Kluchka added that the Commission strongly supports further study of the tree preservation standards and landscape standards in subsequent ordinance revisions. Kluchka referred to the proposed recommendations regarding PUDs. He said the issue is whether a minimum lot size of 2 acres for residential PUDs should be created. Segelbaum said he's worried that all flexibility is being taken away. Waldhauser said there are three exceptions to allow smaller PUDs listed in the recommended language. Baker questioned if PUDs have been misused in the past. Blum said the City nap§;to make sure the PUD process isn't being used to circumvent the requirements end he`tftnks the language is legitimate and has been fairly crafted. Kluchka stated that the City has more control when the PUD process is used and he likes the idea of having input in res4dential PUD proposals. Waldhauser questioned who makes the decisivn'that a,prdposarean be considered as a PUD. Zimmerman suggested that language be°added, stating that the City Manager or his/her designee are allowed to determine when a,proposla, Fcan be considered as a PUD. MOVED by Baker, seconded by Cera and motion carried unanimously to recommend approval of the proposed language regarding PUD standards and guidelines with clarification about how the Applicant demonstrates the need for a PUD. Kluchka suggested the remaining items ncluding lot width; lot line definitions, rear yard setback and the other miscellaneous chanoes�6 "tonsidered in one motion. MOVED by Cera, seconded by Biker aInd motion carried unanimously to recommend approval of the rest of the prgpqsecf Iarguage changes as specified in the staff report. Waldhauser added that she�'wasllra fa r of only having one front lot line on corner lots. She said she thought the corisuftts gave them the option of choosing one front over the other that would fit lost witki he context of the neighborhood and then the other front yard would be consideret,,a side;, --Short Recess -- 4. Rep6rts'6n M'0etings of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority, City Citcil�;Boarzdf Zoning Appeals and other Meetings 5 Other business e Planning for Golden Valley Road/Highway 55 West Redevelopment Area Zimmerman referred to two vacant Commercial properties located in the Golden Valley Road/Highway 55 West Redevelopment Area. He stated that there has been recent interest in auto uses at those properties so the City Council would like the Planning Commission to consider other possible land uses for this area. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission February 23, 2015 Page 14 Waldhauser stated that if the Golden Villas multi -family proposal gets built, they probably wouldn't want auto uses around it. Zimmerman stated that the VFW has expressed interest, or the two parcels in question could be used for housing. He stated that one idea is to consider a pedestrian overlay district to freeze things in place. Waldhauser said she liked the example pedestrian overlay language included in the agenda packet. Segelbaum said it would be nice to be consistent with the downtown area. Kluchka questioned how far they should go in calling something pedesfiiian friendly and questioned what the City would get out of it. Johnson asked about the downside of auto uses. Kluchka saidf6' wouln'tntervice centers or gas stations that are disruptive to neighborhoods Ziii 'mot ian noted'lhat they would currently be allowed with a Conditional Use Permit;, ,Bak4r state fhat these two parcels wouldn't be conducive for a gas station. Waldhause said she'thinks the properties are too narrow to be used for anything real _dyi auric. Kluchka referred to the highway slip ramp and asked if theplan to do improvements or close it are still in place. Zimmerman said yes.. Segelbaum said he is always in favor ofwalkability. Baker said this area isn't downtown and he doesn't see this as a walkable area. He questioned why this area is being studied and said it feels artificial. Kluchka said that the pedestrian overlay may be the right thing to do and suggested that it be considered during the Comprehensive Plan amendment process. Baker careed ahtt�the area should be studied when the Comprehensive Plan is amended Zirtirnerman noted that in the meantime another use could go in these properties., Segelbaum asked whdt,elise they could do besides the suggested pedestrian overlay district. Zimmerman said they could recommend rezoning the properties. Waldhauser questioned if the Commercial Zoning District could be divided. Kluchka sai f e fhin; a_ pedestrian overlay district should exist. Baker agreed that he liked the l0,a, he, is jusinot compelled to use it in this area. The Commissioners agreed. Planning Commission Annual Report Kluchka roferred to the Commission's Annual Report and asked the Commissioners if they had a sense of priority for any of the items listed. Waldhauser asked if the items in the report were for 2014 or 2015. Kluchka said they are pertaining to items in 2014 and that the report is not a work plan for 2015. Blum said he is surprised that they haven't had a lot of discussion about light rail and added that that seems to be one of the hottest issues. He stated that a lot of city attorneys he works with were raising the issue of marijuana production, growing, and Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission February 23, 2015 Page 15 distributing and creating land use controls around those types of facilities. He said he doesn't want something to slip in where it is not wanted and wants to be prepared for these facilities. Zimmerman stated that the City has been contacted and that those types of used would fit in the Commercial Zoning District as a pharmacy. • Council Liaison Report No report was given. 6. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 10:12 pm. Charles D. Segelbaum, Secretary city of goldenlvaio.,.1.0 ley Date: March 9, 2015 Wo Planning Department 763-593-8095 / 763-593-8109 (fax) To: Golden Valley Planning Commission From: Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager Emily Goellner, Associate Planner/Grant Writer Subject: Informal Public Hearing — Final PUD Plan for Central Park West PUD No. 121 —1400 and 1500 State Highway 100 South, 5075 Wayzata Blvd, 1511 Utica Ave South — DLC Residential, LLC, Applicant Summary DLC Residential, LLC, is seeking approval of a Final Planned Unit Development (PUD) Permit to develop several buildings and a parking ramp at the southwest quadrant of 1-394 and Highway 100. This PUD proposal is unique in that it is located in both the City of Golden Valley and the City of St. Louis Park. In order to promote high quality site planning, staff at both cities have analyzed the same site plan set simultaneously. The Preliminary PUD application was m. approved by the City of St. Louis Park t"394 City Council on December 15 and Golden Valley City Council on December 16. The (pqu Rd (SLP) a property is zoned for Business and Professional Offices in Y 'r Golden Valley and it is guided for long-term office use on the General Land Use Plan map. The _ a 16th Stre t r !' total area of site is 13.48 acres with 6 acres in Golden Valley. The proposed q` co PUD would allow the applicant to construct two 6 -story multi -family -4 $ _ %, 430 residential buildings, one 6 -story limited North ° service hotel, a 7 -story parking ramp, two 11 -story office buildings, and a park. Currently, the site is primarily covered par'.' -. by impervious surface.4 r 62, Page 1 Site Map " i-394 (tt a 'nth Sere 1,, cu t,f 3 ■� PUD Site Boundary C' Site Background iLy Boundary This is a unique PUD site because it is located in two cities. The portion of the site in St. Louis Park is located in the city's West End Redevelopment Area and Tax Increment Financing (TIF) district. The TIF district was approved in 2007 to pay for street and infrastructure improvements for the West End development, owned by Duke Realty. Duke received preliminary approval in 2009 from City of Golden Valley and City of St. Louis Park for the Towers at West End preliminary plan, which included four office towers and a parking ramp. However, Duke has not applied for final approval. Both cities have granted several extensions to allow more time to submit the final PUD application. The applicant for PUD No. 121, DLC Residential, LLC, intends to purchase the land from Duke Realty. The site plan in review today was influenced by Duke Realty's Towers at West End plan and by other site conditions. Two key conditions include the border of the TIF district in St. Louis Park and the proximity of the large retaining walls bordering the two major highways. DLC recently developed the Millennium at West End apartments and if final PUD approval is granted, they plan to own and operate the two residential buildings and the park. DLC intends to sell the land slated for the hotel, offices, and parking ramp to developers that specialize in those types of development. Amendments to this PUD would be required by both Cities prior to construction. Page 2 Site Plan Summary and Analysis Lot 1: Residential Phase 1 The first phase of multi -family residential development would include 199 units, consisting primarily of one -bedroom and two-bedroom units. Three-bedroom units, alcoves, and units with dens would also be provided. The majority of parking spaces, 164 spaces, would be provided underground. On the first floor of the building, 71 spaces would be provided, but would not be visible from the street. To reach the minimum parking requirement, 33 spaces would be tandem parking spaces. There would also be 25 parking spaces provided on the east side of the building in a small surface lot. The lobby would be located off of Utica Avenue and 6 guest parking spaces would be designated in the "woonerf," which is a Dutch term for a living street in which all modes of traffic move at walking pace, guided by design elements that calm traffic. The rooms would range in size from 550 square feet to 1,500 square feet. Rents would range from approximately $1,000/month to $2,800/month depending on the size and location of the unit. Some units would be made affordable with rent at 60% of the area median income. y North Lot 1 comparison to R-4 Zoning District Regulations* Note: Many requirements within the underlying zoning district are flexible in a PUD approval Factor Required Proposed Use Height Multiple -Family Residential permitted -- Multiple -Family Residential 6 stories Density 12 units/acre minimum 57.51 units/acre Floor Area Ratio -- 1.41 Ground Floor Area Ratio .45 maximum .35 Structure Coverage 45% maximum 35% Impervious Surface 60% maximum 74.28% Setbacks Front: 25' Side: 20' Rear:20' Side: 20' Front: 15' Side: 0' Rear: 60' Side: 0' Lot Area 20,000 square feet minimum 101,495 square feet Car Parking 1.5 spaces per dwelling 1.5 spaces x 199 dwellings = 298.5 spaces 321 spaces *The site is zoned for Office, but this is a comparison of the proposed residential building to its comparable zoning district in Golden Valley, which is R-4 High Density Residential. Outlot A: Park On the site plan, the public gathering space is identified as a linear park. A linear park is a park that is substantially longer than it is wide. The park would act as a connection for pedestrians and bicyclists between the west and east side of the site. The 37,897 square foot park would be Page 3 privately owned by the applicant and a public access easement would be established to ensure perpetual public use. The specific design of the park will be informed by discussions with Parks and Planning staff at City of Golden Valley and City of St. Louis Park. The park will be privately maintained. In response to staff's request, the applicant has agreed to provide pavement markings on one of the paths in the park to distinguish between bike traffic and pedestrian traffic. Lot 2: Residential Phase 2: The second phase of residential development, located entirely in St. Louis Park, is identified as Lot 2/Residential Phase 2 on the site plan. There are 164 units proposed for this building, which would consist primarily of one -bedroom and two-bedroom units with some three-bedroom units, alcove units, and units with dens. Like the residential building on Lot 1, the majority of parking spaces would be provided underground, totaling 169 spaces. On the first floor, 79 spaces would be provided, but would not be visible from the street. No tandem parking is proposed. The lobby would be located off of Utica Avenue and -- _ - the woonerf, where 4 guest parking LOT 2 - RESIDENTIAL PHASE 2 b STORIES -164 UNrrS spaces would also be designated. Very 79-M11VUSr US ; similar to the first phase of residential 156- UNDEWROUNDSIFALLS ,� development, the rooms would range in �+ size from 550 square feet to 1,500 square I feet. Rents would range from :- REM ARL approximately $1,000/month to f $2,800/month depending on the size and location of the unit. Some units would be 0* North made affordable with rent at 60% of the area median income. Lot 2 comparison to R-4 Zoning District Regulations* Note: Many requirements within the underlying zoning district are flexible in a PUD approval Factor Required Proposed Use Multiple -Family Residential permitted Multiple -Family Residential Height -- 6 stories Density 12 units/acre minimum 107.19 units/acre Floor Area Ratio -- 2.58 Ground Floor Area Ratio .45 maximum .72 Structure Coverage 45% maximum 72% Impervious Surface 60% maximum —Front- 77.12% Setbacks 25' Side: 20' Rear: 20' Side: 20' Front: 10' Side: 0' Rear: 0' Side: 0' Lot Area 20,000 square feet minimum 72,310 square feet Car Parking 1.5 spaces per dwelling 1.5 spaces x 164 dwellings = 246 spaces 235 spaces *The site is zoned for Office, but this is a comparison of the proposed residential building to its comparable zoning district in Golden Valley, which is R-4 High Density Residential. Page 4 Lot 3: Hotel The 6 -story hotel would provide up to 150 rooms. _ The entrance and surface parking would be located LOT 3 - HOTEL off of Wayzata Boulevard. Underground parking ssMES-MRO Ms would also be provided. In both St. Louis Park and ao-uNDEaStoMsnws Golden Valley, hotels must provide at least 1.5 parking spaces per room, which requires a total of 225 spaces for this development. With 66 surface lot spaces and 27 underground spaces totaling 93 r,40 V. 41 spaces, there is not an adequate amount of parking , �� provided. The applicant is exploring ways to �'� .� 41 4. 4 provide additional underground parking, a shared parking agreement with the office ramp, or a combination of the two. The hotel would be limited -service, so a restaurant, pool, and other such amenities would not be provided. Limited -service hotels are typically more budget -friendly, employ a smaller staff, and are less costly to operate than full-service hotels. Lot 3 comparison to Commercial Zoning District Regulations* Note: Many requirements within the underlying zoning district are flexible in a PUD approval Factor Required Proposed Use Hotel permitted Hotel & surface parking lot Height 3 stories (more permitted with 6 stories Conditional Use Permit) Floor Area Ratio -- 1.21 Ground Floor Area Ratio -- .2 Structure Coverage 50% maximum 20% Impervious Surface -- 75.78% Setbacks Front: 35' Front: 15' Side: 30' Side: 0' Side: 30' Side: 0' Rear: 30' Rear: 10' Lot Area -- 1.61 acres Car Parking 1.5 spaces/unit 85 spaces on Lot 3. An additional 1.5 spaces x 150 units = 225 spaces 140 parking spaces have been provided in parking ramp on Outlot A to meet minimum parking requirement *The site is zoned for Office, but this is a comparison of the proposed hotel building to its comparable zoning district in Golden Valley, which is Commercial zoning. Page 5 Outlot A: Offices & Parking Ramp: Two 11 -story office buildings and a 7 -story parking ramp are proposed for Outlot A on the south side of the PUD site. The ramp was placed close to the large retaining wall bordering Highway 100 and the offices were placed near existing offices to the west and south. The largest and most visible access point to the parking ramp would be off - Utica Avenue and parking ` - --- ramp entrances would also —' e provided along Lilac DriveNKEW �.:. ,Ow on the south and east sides OUTLOT A -OFFICE � OUTLOT A —OFFICE' of the ramp. In each office PHME2 PHASE building, 50 underground i stalls would be provided. A I i � a large drop-off area would be ' located at the entrance to , ( ounorA CITY OF it L6UISPARK each building. The applicant -7771 intends to sell Outlot A to an off -11 ?' office developer for furthers i, !i jfl I 1 I I It design, construction, and management. The parking r r t, �_ ` cr - ramp would cross the municipal boundary with the --_ - majority located in Golden'---_ Valley. Outlot A comparison to Business & Professional Offices Zoning District Regulations Note: Many requirements within the underlying zoning district are flexible in a PUD approval Factor Required Proposed Use Office and structured parking 2 office buildings & 1 parking ramp permitted Height 3 stories (more permitted with 11 stories –offices Conditional Use Permit) 7 stories – parking ramp Floor Area Ratio -- 2.35 Ground Floor Area Ratio .40 maximum .21 (for offices only) Structure Coverage 40% maximum 21% (for offices only) Impervious Surface 60% maximum 82.609/. Setbacks Front: 75' Front: varies Side: 60' Side: varies Side: 60' Side: varies Rear: 60' Rear: varies Lot Area Minimum 1 acre 7.01 acres Car Parking 1 space per 250 square 2,494 spaces 353,353 square feet _ 250 = 1,413.4 = 1,414 spaces required x 2 buildings = 2,828 spaces required Page 6 Parking Of the 3,598 spaces required, the site plan provides 3,275 spaces, which is equivalent to roughly 91% of the total required parking. The site plan is lacking a total of 323 spaces according to Golden Valley regulations. St. Louis Park requires less parking than Golden Valley for office and residential uses, so the total parking required by St. Louis Park standards is 2,959 spaces, which is less than what is proposed. During the preliminary approval process, staffs at both Cities directed the applicant to address parking shortages for the hotel. In response, the applicant has located 140 parking spaces in the office ramp. Those spaces will be designated for hotel users. This arrangement will be further analyzed when the applicant applies for an amendment to the PUD to build the hotel, offices, and parking ramp. Bike Parking The City of Golden Valley requires bike parking calculated as at least 5% of the required car parking. The City of St. Louis Park requires 10%. There are 112 bike parking spaces planned for Residential Phase 1, which is equivalent to 35% of the total amount of car spaces. On Residential Phase 2, 100 bike parking spaces are provided, which is equivalent to 42% of the total amount of car spaces. Affordable Housing DLC has proposed providing 3% affordable units at 60% of the area median income (based on 2014 AMI rates). The affordable units would consist of eight (8) alcove units, one (1) 1 -bedroom, and two (2) 1 -bedroom units with a den. This would provide a total of eleven (11) affordable units. Joint Powers Agreement It was initially though by Staff that a Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) would be necessary to address issues that arise with a shared PUD site. After discussions between Staff and the City Attorney, it has been determined that a JPA will not be the appropriate mechanism to carry out the goals of the City for this project. The City cannot abdicate its authority to enforce its ordinances to another agency or entity with this type of contact. The issues, such as permitting or inspections for the structures that lie across the City boundary, can be addressed through service contracts. Each circumstance would require a unique contract that outlines the services provided and the revenues received. In the absence of a JPA or any service contracts, services and fees would be executed on either side of the municipal boundary as they are today. As is being done with the initial approval, future changes or modifications to the PUD would require approval by both Golden Valley and St. Louis Park. Signs and Lighting Applications to erect signage have not been submitted. Sign permitting will be separated by city boundaries. A detailed lighting plan was submitted with the final PUD application. The lighting plan complies with the outdoor lighting requirements in the Golden Valley City Code, which is generally more restrictive than the St. Louis Park City Code. Page 7 Construction Phasing An overall phasing plan is provided on plat sheet PH -0 of the plan submittal. Utica Avenue will be constructed in the first phase of development, which will begin in spring 2015 if final approval is granted by both cities. Phase 1 residential and the park will also be completed in the first phase. The second phase will include the second residential building at the corner of Wayzata Boulevard and Utica Avenue and will occur from spring 2016 to fall 2017. The hotel will be constructed in the third phase of development, which will require an amendment to the PUD. At this phase, detailed building elevations and parking will be further examined. The exact timing of the hotel and office development may vary based on market conditions. The office is expected to be developed in the fourth and fifth phases, which would occur between spring 2016 and fall 2020. Since the proposed offices and parking ramp are located on an outlot, an amendment to the PUD that includes a final plat will be required before building permits are issued. Engineering Traffic Generally, traffic will circulate around the site on a soon-to-be reconstructed Utica Avenue South and the Wayzata Boulevard south frontage road. The 2014 AUAR update projects a reduction of traffic levels in the PM peak and a slight increase in the AM peak. Previous traffic projections prompted Golden Valley to recommend intersection and road improvements to the east of the site at the intersection with Quentin Avenue and east along Wayzata Boulevard. Due to concerns expressed by residents during the preliminary PUD review process, City Council required that the AUAR be updated and an additional neighborhood meeting be hosted by the applicant. The AUAR update was completed by Kimley-Horn on January 19, 2015 and the neighborhood meeting was hosted on January 28, 2015. The results of the AUAR update and expectations for traffic impact mitigation by the applicant are further explained in the memo from the Engineering Division dated March 4, 2015. Site Access & Circulation The site is bisected by an east -west liner park that provides a major pedestrian and bicycle link between the West End and the underpass to Highway 100. Additional sidewalks internal to the site connect the proposed uses and a new sidewalk is planned along Utica Avenue. An existing sidewalk along Wayzata Boulevard will remain. Automobile access to the office towers is from the Utica to the west, as it the primary access to the parking structure. Additional, secondary, access to the parking structure is from Wayzata Boulevard to the east. The residential buildings and the hotel would have multiple access points along Utica and Wayzata Boulevard. The combined service area for lots 1, 2, and 3 (hotel and two apartment buildings) would be tucked into the woonerf between the three buildings. Pavement treatments and design elements would slow vehicles and allow for the mixing of pedestrians and automobiles. The applicant has agreed to limit garbage pick-up to one servicer, reducing the number of trucks that would have to enter the area. Page 8 The site is currently served by transit routes 9, 604, and 649. West 16th Street at its intersection with Utica has already been constructed to accommodate bus service. Metro Transit has indicated they are examining options for incorporating the new development into their existing routes. Landscaping & Tree Preservation The applicant has submitted landscaping plans which indicate a significant concentration of trees and landscaping around the perimeter of the site, as well as within the central park. As outlined in the memo from the Engineering Division, the City Forester will review the plans in more detail and work to alleviate concerns regarding potential corner visibility issues. A Tree Preservation Permit will be required before construction begins. Financial securities will be required to cover the cost of any landscaping replacement during the two-year warranty period. Easements & Utilities An existing 20 foot wide watermain easement exists along the eastern boundary of the PUD. This easement will remain in place as the project is constructed. There is an existing shared operation and access agreement in place over the privately owned Lilac Drive which will also remain. Dedication of additional drainage and utility easements along all streets, property lines, and plat boundaries will be required as part of the final plat. An Alternate Urban Area -wide Review (AUAR) analysis was completed in 2007 and updated in 2013 based on previous proposals for the West End and for this site. A new update was conducted in October of 2014 to compare the impacts of the current proposal to those identified previously. Sanitary sewer and water usage under the revised scenario both remained below the limits of what can be accommodated, though the water system capacity rose above the preferred 90% total system use for St. Louis Park. Current plans indicate all sanitary sewer and water services will be provided by St. Louis Park. Long term capacity concerns regarding water may suggest that one or more properties could receive water service from Golden Valley. Stormwater & Impervious Surface The entire development drains into the Minnehaha Creek Watershed and the two cities have agreed that St. Louis Park will coordinate the review of the Stormwater Management Plan for the entire PUD with the developer and the watershed. As phased development occurs, individual properties within Golden Valley must obtain Stormwater Management Permits from the City. The amount of impervious surface for the entire PUD is estimated to be 79%. Golden Valley PUD standards require the amount to remain under 90% for Mixed Use projects that include housing, retail, and office. Page 9 Fire Safety The Fire Department reviewed this proposal to ensure that all buildings are equipped with fire protections systems and that adequate emergency vehicle access is achieved on the site. A memorandum from the Fire Department that addresses fire access, water supply, and fire hydrant location is attached. A handful of issues remain and must be addressed and approved by the Fire Department prior to Final PUD Plan approval. Findings for Approval In order to be approved as a PUD, the City must be able to make the following findings: 1. Quality Site Planning. The PUD plan is tailored to the specific characteristics of the site, such as the proximity to high retaining walls and highway traffic to the north and east and high-density development to the south and west. With flexibility under a PUD in uses allowed, setbacks, height, parking requirements, number of buildings on a lot, and similar requirements, the quality of site planning and design is of higher quality than if each parcel was designed individually under conventional provisions. By allowing a mix of land uses, the site plan offers the opportunity to live, work, visit, and enjoy outdoor gathering space. The PUD encourages creativity and flexibility in land development. 2. Preservation. The PUD plan preserves and protects substantial desirable portions of the site's characteristics, open space and sensitive environmental features including steep slopes, trees, scenic views, creeks, wetlands, and open waters. The site is currently used for surface parking and is mostly impervious. Even though 36 existing trees will be removed, the proposed plan adds about 37,897 square feet of public gathering space, roughly 245 trees, and 19,742 square feet of shrubs and perennial beds to the site. 3. Efficient & Effective. The PUD plan includes efficient and effective use of the land. The PUD plan provides an appropriate area of the city for high-density office, residential, and hotel uses. The PUD plan encourages development that is sustainable and has a high degree of energy efficiency. 4. Compatibility. The PUD Plan results in development compatible with adjacent uses and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and redevelopment plans and goals. High-density office, commercial, and residential uses surround the site to the south and west. Low- density residential uses are separated from this proposed PUD site by significant highway development. The PUD plan increases housing options, jobs, lodging options, and gathering space to the area. 5. General Health. The PUD plan is consistent with preserving and improving the general health, safety and general welfare of the people of the City. By encouraging the use of contemporary land planning principles, the PUD plan offers the ability to live, work, shop, and spend time outdoors without reliability on the automobile. The PUD plan promotes pedestrian activity and provides high-quality landscaping additions to the site. 6. Meets Requirements. The PUD plan meets the PUD Intent and Purpose provision and all other PUD ordinance provisions. The PUD provision permits flexibility from other provisions in Chapter 11 of the City Code. This flexibility is permitted in order to promote the intent and purpose of the PUD section of the City Code. Page 10 Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the Final Plan for Central Park West PUD No. 121, subject to the following conditions: 1. The plans prepared by DLC Residential, LLC, submitted with the application on February 4, 2015, shall become a part of this approval. 2. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Engineering Division to the Planning Manager, dated March 4, 2015, shall become a part of this approval. 3. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Fire Department to the Planning Manager, dated March 2, 2015, shall become a part of this approval. The applicant shall address the remaining unresolved issues outlined in the memo prior to final PUD approval. 4. All signage must meet the requirements of the City's Sign Code (Section 4.20). 5. A park dedication fee of $70,568 (2% of the estimated land value) shall be paid prior to approval of the Final Plat. 6. The Final Plat shall include "P.U.D." in its title. 7. This approval is subject to all other state, federal, and local ordinances, regulations, or laws with authority over this development. 8. The City of St. Louis Park approves that portion of the preliminary planned unit development within its jurisdiction 9. The property owners of any parcel in the PUD No. 121 shall follow the Travel Demand Management Plan for the West End Redevelopment and Central Park West prepared by Kimley-Horn and submitted with the final PUD application in February 2015, which will serve to reduce traffic congestion. Prior to final PUD approval, the applicant shall include specific target dates in this plan. The applicant shall pay the remaining 50% of the Traffic Management Administration Fees for Lot 1 when submitting a building permit application. The applicant or future property owner of Lot 3 and Outlot A shall pay the Traffic Management Administration Fees, as outlined in the City's 1-394 Overlay Zoning District Ordinance (Section 11.56). 10. The Developer shall enter into an agreement with the City of Golden Valley for public use of the park outlot. 11. Prior to the City signing and releasing the final plat to the developer for filing with Hennepin County, the PUD permit and Development Agreement shall be finalized between the City and the Developer. Attachments Location Map (1 page) Memo from the Engineering Division dated March 4, 2015 (9 pages) Memo from the Fire Department dated March 2, 2015 (3 pages) Travel Demand Management Plan submitted February 4, 2015 (9 pages) AUAR update dated January 19, 2015 (55 pages) Site Plans submitted February 4, 2015 (76 pages) Page 11 ------------------------ J ----------------------------------------- - Subject Properties Prop -- -------- STIOWS PARK & I city of golden, � a ey Date: March 4, 2015 MEMORANDUM Public Works Department 763-593-8030 / 763-593-3988 (fax) To: meson Zimmerman, Planning Manager From: Jeff Oliver, PE, City Engineer Eric Eckman, Public Works Sp#a )st Subject: Central Park West — Final PUD Review Engineering staff has reviewed the plans for the proposed Central Park West development, submitted by DLC Residential (Developer). The proposed development is located in the southwest corner of Interstate 394 and Trunk Highway 100 and replaces a previously approved proposal from Duke Realty for construction of four office towers and a parking ramp. The proposed development consists of a mix of residential apartments, office, hotel, and public open space uses. The majority of this site is located within the City of St. Louis Park. However, the eastern portion of the site is located within the City of Golden Valley, immediately adjacent to Highway 100 and Wayzata Boulevard (the south frontage road for 1-394). This memorandum focuses on the portion of the project located in Golden Valley and discusses issues identified during the Engineering review that must be addressed prior to final plat submittal. The comments contained within this review are based on the plans submitted to the City on February 4, 2015. Site Plan The portion of the proposed PUD within the City of Golden Valley includes the construction of the following: • Part of a six -story apartment building which extends across the city limit line (Lot 1, Block 1) • A portion of the linear park public open space (public easement within Lot 1, Block 1) • A surface parking lot for the hotel site (Lot 3, Block 1) • An eight -level parking ramp adjacent to the proposed offices (shown on Outlot A) The Developer has provided an overall phasing plan as part of the final PUD plan submittal. According to the phasing plan, construction would be as follows: G:\Developments - Private\Central Park West (former Duke)\CPW_Final PUD review_030415.docx • Phase 1— Utica Avenue improvements, Apartment building on Lot 1, Block 1 which straddles the city limits line, and the Linear Park • Phase 2 —Apartments on Lot 2, Block 1 in St. Louis Park • Phase 3 —The hotel on Lot 3, Block 1 (hotel parking lot in Golden Valley) • Phases 4 and 5 — Offices and parking structure on Outlot A The Developer has submitted a temporary parking, staging, and access plan related to each phase of construction. It is anticipated that staff from Golden Valley and St. Louis Park will work together with the Developer to ensure that the plan is carried out successfully. The City of Golden Valley reserves the right to work with the Developer and Contractor to require modifications to the plan if situations arise that negatively impact traffic, pedestrian safety, infrastructure, or water quality. The Developer proposes three permanent access points onto Wayzata Boulevard in Golden Valley. One of these access points is an existing private street (labeled Lilac Drive) serving several properties on the west side of Highway 100, south of this PUD. This street intersects Wayzata Boulevard in the middle of a sharp curve just west of Highway 100. The other two proposed access points are north of this intersection and will serve the new uses described above. Since the preliminary PUD was reviewed, the Developer addressed the City's concerns about access and shifted the center driveway access to the north to provide additional separation and to discourage cut -through traffic movements to Utica Avenue. The plan modifications are therefore acceptable as proposed. The development includes the removal of existing driveway entrances and the construction of new entrances. Therefore, a City Right -of -Way Management Permit is required. All driveway entrances must meet the City standards for commercial driveway aprons. Plans submitted by the Developer show the construction of pedestrian facilities through the linear park open space to promote east -west movements between Utica Avenue and Wayzata Boulevard. The plans also show pedestrian facilities connecting all new structures and parking lots to the City's existing sidewalk along Wayzata Boulevard. All new pedestrian facilities must meet Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accessibility standards. In addition, the City of Golden Valley must be party to all easements dedicated by the Developer for the public use of sidewalks and trails located both inside and outside of the linear park open space, within the City of Golden Valley. Copies of all recorded easements must be submitted to the Engineering office before the issuance of permits. The City of Golden Valley owns and maintains the existing concrete sidewalk on the south and west side of Wayzata Boulevard adjacent to this PUD. This existing sidewalk extends to the east under Highway 100 to connect with the existing sidewalk on Wayzata Boulevard/Quentin Avenue on the east side of the highway. The plans indicate that the existing sidewalk on Wayzata will remain in place during and after construction. As part of the development, the Developer must install curb ramps meeting ADA accessibility standards and City standards at all street and G:\Developments - Private\Central Park West (former Duke)\CPW_Final PUD review 030415.docx driveway crossings, as directed by the City Engineer. The Developer will also be responsible for replacing any portions of the existing sidewalk that is damaged during construction. Staff from the cities of Golden Valley and St. Louis Park met with the Developer to discuss the options for long-term maintenance of the sidewalk on Wayzata Boulevard adjacent to this PUD. It was determined that the Developer or future property owner will maintain this portion of sidewalk in the winter, in a manner consistent with the City's sidewalk and trail winter maintenance policy. This will be included in the operations and maintenance agreement for the development. All public sidewalks parallel to Wayzata Boulevard must be located within platted right-of-way or dedicated walkway easements. If easements are required, the Developer must submit legal descriptions, exhibits, and draft easement documents for review by the City, prior to the consideration of final plat approval. A City Right -of -Way Management Permit is required for all excavations and obstructions within public right-of-way including sidewalk construction. Traffic Management In 2007, the City of St. Louis Park prepared an Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) for the PUD that was brought forth and approved at that time. The purpose of the AUAR was to determine potential impacts from the development to adjacent facilities and to evaluate potential environmental impacts. The AUAR included a traffic analysis of the development, which was reviewed by the City's consulting Traffic Engineer, Mike Kotila, of SEH, Inc. The primary recommendations at that time was to modify the intersection of Wayzata Boulevard and Quentin Avenue on the east side of Highway 100 by making it an all -way stop and providing additional turn lanes to better accommodate the increased traffic and vehicle stacking in the area. In addition, a recommendation was made to consider implementing potential traffic calming, pedestrian accommodations and sight -line improvements along the south 1-394 Frontage Road (Wayzata Boulevard) east of TH 100. The Developer of this PUD has updated the previously approved AUAR traffic analysis to reflect the change of uses and traffic projections in the current Central Park West PUD. The updated AUAR analysis and PUD plans have been forwarded to the City's Traffic Engineer for review and a copy of his review dated February 13, 2015 is attached to this memo for reference. As outlined in the February 13th memo, Mr. Kotila reviewed the Developer's trip generation and distributions, as well as other assumptions, and found them to be sound. In addition, Mr. Kotila concurs that the conclusions in the 2007 AUAR, and those reached in the updated study, are still valid. Again, the primary recommendation remains that due to the decrease in the level of service at Wayzata Boulevard and Quentin Avenue resulting from the PUD, the turn -lane improvements still need to be implemented. G:\Developments - Private\Central Park West (former Duke)\CPW_Final PUD review 030415.docx The February 131h memorandum also addresses the traffic calming, pedestrian and sight line concerns identified in 2007. The study concludes that the increase in traffic resulting from the current PUD proposal does not create any new, or unduly add to, the existing traffic issues on Wayzata Boulevard. Therefore, staff is not recommending that this Developer be responsible for additional improvements on Wayzata Boulevard. Due to the nature of the existing traffic concerns on Wayzata Boulevard east of TH 100, staff will begin the process of proposing future projects for consideration in the City's Capital Improvement Program (CIP) process. Staff will also begin looking for other potential funding sources to finance the construction of traffic calming, sight line, and pedestrian and bicycle improvements along Wayzata Boulevard. Because the recommended improvements at Wayzata Boulevard and Quentin Avenue can be directly attributed to the proposed PUD, the Developer will be required to fund these improvements. The intersection improvements will be constructed by the City as a public improvement project with an estimated total project cost of $250,000. Therefore, the Developer will be required to post an escrow with the City in this amount. This escrow must be posted prior to the consideration of final plat approval. Proposed Final Plat As discussed earlier in this review, portions of this PUD are located in both Golden Valley and St. Louis Park. The three existing parcels in Golden Valley are comprised of both platted and unplatted properties. The south two parcels contain portions of the Kavlis Cedardale plat of record. City records indicate that the streets and alleys within Kavlis Cedardale have been vacated. The City of Golden Valley has an 8 -inch ductile iron watermain within a 20 -foot wide watermain easement (Document No. 2491260) along the eastern boundary of the PUD. The Developer has shown and labeled this easement on the preliminary plat. This watermain easement must remain in place and therefore will not be vacated. The proposed final plat for this development includes the dedication of drainage and utility easements along streets, property lines, and plat boundaries consistent with the City's Subdivision Ordinance. However, the Developer must also dedicate a public drainage and utility easement over the portion of Lot 3 (hotel site) that is proposed for an underground stormwater treatment system. It is anticipated that the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) will oversee and ensure the long-term inspection and maintenance of this system by the Developer or future property owner. Therefore, it is the understanding of staff that the City of Golden Valley will have no future ownership, maintenance responsibility, or maintenance oversight of this stormwater treatment system. Utilities (Water and Sanitary Sewer) The plans submitted show that all uses in the PUD will receive sanitary sewer and water service from the City of St. Louis Park. G:\Developments - Private\Central Park West (former Duke)\CPW_Final PUD review_030415.docx In the original AUAR prepared by the City of St. Louis Park, Golden Valley identified a capacity issue with MCES Interceptor 1 -GV -461. The Golden Valley concern was that additional sewer flows would be generated from the PUD before the completion of the MCES Forcemain Reliever project. However, the delay in construction of the PUD has allowed MCES to complete several phases of construction. It appears now that the MCES Lift Station and final phase of the Reliever project will be constructed in 2015 and should be completed and operational before completion of the PUD. The Developer must show and label the planned location of the MCES forcemain on the final construction plans. Stormwater Management The proposed development is located within the Minnehaha Creek Watershed and ultimately flows to Brownie Lake in Minneapolis. As such, plan review and permitting will be required by the MCWD. Because most of the stormwater improvements are located within the City of St. Louis Park, St. Louis Park staff has agreed to coordinate the review of the stormwater management plan with the MCWD for the entire PUD to ensure the plan meets MCWD, St. Louis Park, and Golden Valley requirements. This coordination includes the drafting and recording of all maintenance agreements necessary to ensure the permanent stormwater treatment facilities are adequately inspected and maintained into the future. Coordination by St. Louis Park and MCWD may also include permitting and inspection of the temporary erosion and sediment control measures associated with the initial phases of development, if not specific to any one parcel. Staff from both cities and MCWD will review the construction phasing plan together to determine how to proceed with this effort, before permits are issued. In addition to a MCWD permit, the City of Golden Valley will require that the Developer obtain a City Stormwater Management Permit for each parcel within the City of Golden Valley, as phased development occurs. This PUD is also subject to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's Construction Stormwater Permit. A copy of this permit must be submitted to the City before work can begin. There is one proposed storm sewer connection which will connect directly to the City of Golden Valley's system within Wayzata Boulevard. This connection will serve the future hotel site. A City Right -of -Way Management permit will be required for the excavation of Wayzata Boulevard and connection to the City's storm sewer system. Tree Preservation/Landscape Plan The portion of the PUD in Golden Valley is subject to the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance and Minimum Landscape Standards. A Landscape Plan and an inventory of significant trees were submitted by the Developer. A Tree Preservation Permit will be required before construction can G:\Developments - Private\Central Park West (former Duke)\CPW_Final PUD review 030415.docx begin. The City Forester will review the plans in more detail and work with the Developer on tree and shrub selection and location, and alleviating any potential corner visibility issues, before the issuance of permits. The Developer must submit an estimate of the cost to furnish and install the landscape plant materials shown within the Golden Valley portion of the PUD (this could also be based on a percentage of the plant materials provided for the entire PUD). This cost estimate will be used to determine the financial security which is held as a guarantee that the landscaping will survive the two-year warranty period. Details regarding the landscape security will be provided in the development agreement for this PUD. Summary and Recommendations Engineering staff recommends approval of the final PUD plans for Central Park West subject to the comments contained in this review, which are summarized as follows: 1. A City Right -of -Way Management Permit is required for all proposed excavations and obstructions within public rights-of-way and easements, including driveway, sidewalk, and storm sewer construction, as discussed in this review. 2. The Developer must install ADA curb ramps at all street and driveway crossings, and replace/reconstruct any portions of the City's sidewalk on Wayzata Boulevard that are damaged during construction, as discussed in this review. 3. The Developer is responsible for winter maintenance of the City's sidewalk on Wayzata Boulevard adjacent to this PUD, as discussed in this review. 4. The City of Golden Valley must be party to all easements dedicated by the Developer for the public use of sidewalks and trails located both inside and outside of the linear park open space, within the City of Golden Valley. Copies of all recorded easements must be submitted to the City. 5. The Developer will be required to fund the turn -lane improvements at the intersection of Wayzata Boulevard and Quentin Avenue, as discussed in this review, with an estimated total project cost of $250,000. The Developer must post an escrow with the City prior to the consideration of final plat approval. 6. The final plat for this development must include drainage and utility easements on a portion of Lot 3 (hotel site), as discussed in this review. 7. The Developer must show and label the planned location of the MCES Forcemain Reliever on the final construction plans. 8. The Developer must obtain a City Stormwater Management Permit for each parcel within the City of Golden Valley, as phased development occurs. 9. This PUD is also subject to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's Construction Stormwater Permit. A copy of this permit must be submitted to the City before work can begin. 10. A Tree Preservation Permit will be required before construction can begin. 11. The Developer must submit an estimate of the cost to furnish and install the landscape plant materials shown within the Golden Valley portion of the PUD to assist in determining the landscape financial security. G:\Developments - Private\Central Park West (former Duke)\CPW_Final PUD review_030415.docx Approval is also subject to the review and comments of the City Attorney, other City staff, and other governmental entities such as the City of St. Louis Park, MCWD, MnDOT, MCES, and MPCA. Please feel free to call me if you have any questions regarding this matter. Attachment C: Tom Burt, City Manager Marc Nevinski, Physical Development Director John Crelly, Fire Chief Emily Goellner, Associate Planner Jerry Frevel, Building Official Bert Tracy, Public Works Maintenance Manager Al Lundstrom, Park Maintenance Supervisor and City Forester Mark Ray, Street Maintenance Supervisor Kelley Janes, Utilities Supervisor RJ Kakach, Engineer Tom Hoffman, Water Resources Technician G:\Developments - Private\Central Park West (former Duke)\CPW_Final PUD review_030415.docx lot Building a Better World for All of Usa TO: Jeff Oliver, City Engineer City of Golden Valley FROM: Mike Kotila, PE Senior Transportation Engineer DATE: February 13, 2015 RE: Central Park West Traffic Analysis — SEH Review SEH No. 131241 14.00 MEMORANDUM This memorandum summarizes my review of the traffic analysis performed by Kimley Horn (KH) for the Central Park West development as documented in their January 15, 2015 (Revised January 19, 2015) memorandum with the subject line: West End AUAR Analysis Update — Response to City of Golden Valley Letter (dated December 26, 2014). General Comments • The KH analysis builds upon findings from the 2007 AUAR as documented in the Minneapolis West Redevelopment Traffic Analysis, dated November 2006, by SRF Consulting (2007 Study). The 2007 study fully analyzed a.m. and p.m. peak periods. The current analysis correctly identifies the pm peak hour as the time period of interest. SEH concurs that development trip generation in the a.m. peak period will not control decisions related to mitigation of intersection capacity or safety issues that are appropriate due to the development. • Data Collection — The KH study utilized a combination of sources for existing traffic volumes and historical speed data. KH disclosed circumstances at the time of data collection and any potentially unreliable portions of data that was collected. SEH concurs that enough data was successfully collected to sufficiently represent typical conditions for the purposes of their analysis. SEH does not believe that new data collection would lead to different findings or recommendations. 0 Trip Generation Methods and Assumptions — SEH concurs with the results reported in the KH study. Trip Distribution — The KH study estimated that 15% of the development traffic would use Wayzata Boulevard. SEH considers this to be reasonable given that the site is positioned at the junction of two Principal Arterials providing access to jobs and homes in all parts of the Twin Cities. In addition, the site plan parking and building layout is designed with multiple alternative choices to enter and exit the site via Wayzata Boulevard (west), Park Place, 16th Street and Gamble Drive. Intersection of Wayzata Boulevard and Quentin Avenue • The KH study confirms findings from the 2007 study. SEH concurs, the intersection should be modified to include an eastbound right turn lane and a southbound right turn lane as mitigation to development traffic demands. • Signalization — The KH study examined the need for signalization at the Wayzata Boulevard and Quentin Avenue intersection. SEH concurs that a traffic signal will not be warranted. • Multi -way stop control — Based on intersection capacity (delay), the KH study identified that an all -way stop would be an effective measure when considered in conjunction with the recommended eastbound right turn lane. Further, the KH study identified that the combination of an eastbound right turn lane and a southbound right turn lane would not require an all -way stop control to operate at an Engineers I Architects I Planners i Scientists Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc., 10901 Red Circle Drive, Suite 300, Minnetonka, MN 55343-9302 SEH is 100% employee -owned I sehinc.com 1 952.912.2600 1 800.734.6757 1 888.908.8166 fax Central Park West Traffic Analysis — SEH Review February 13, 2015 Page 2 acceptable level of service. SEH recommends that the all way stop control be included with the addition of both right turn lanes as mitigation to development traffic impacts for several reasons. o The intersection serves as the only pedestrian crossing point from the Tyrol Hills neighborhood across (under) TH 100 to commercial areas west of TH 100 including the existing and proposed West End retail, entertainment, office and residential land uses. o Intersection delays will be minimized. An all -way stop will minimize queue length and delay on the eastbound approach, minimizing potential for queue conflict with the MnPASS exit and entrance to/from 1-394 which occur adjacent to the TH 100 bridge underpass. o Driver compliance and driver expectations - The underpass creates a geographic focal point in the street system. When considered in combination with intersection volumes, turning movements, pedestrian crossings and geometric conditions, an all -way stop will be perceived by drivers as reasonable and will therefore tend to encourage driver compliance. Traffic Calming and Safety Issues - • Existing safety issues along Wayzata Boulevard were identified and reviewed in 2007, by SRF, SEH and City staff. Recommendations included geometric changes to improve intersection sight distance at each cross street intersection in combination with trail improvements along the corridor. The KH study recognizes the existing deficiencies and assesses that while there is an anticipated increase in traffic demand along Wayzata Boulevard from the development, the increment of traffic growth due to development does not create a new problem or unduly add to the existing problem. SEH recommends that the City plan for improvements through other means (i.e. programming for safety improvements as a city funded objective, or in combination with outside trail improvement funding sources). • Traffic Speed — The KH study references speed studies reported by SEH in 2007 which indicated an average 85th percentile speed of 39 mph for both travel directions at all study locations reviewed. SEH believes that this data is representative of today's conditions for the following reasons: o Roadway and intersection geometry are the same today as in 2007. o Traffic volumes are similar. At the time of the speed study, the ADT of Wayzata Boulevard east of Quentin Avenue was 4220 vehicles per day. The 2015 ADT reported in the KH study is 3790. o Vehicle performance has not evolved dramatically such that driver speeds would have increased or decreased. mek pAfj\g\goldv\980100\west end dev\central park west 2014\seh review memo -final 021315.docx Date: March 2, 2015 To: Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager From: John Crelly, Fire Chief Fire Department 63-593-8079 176 V Subject: Final PUD — Central Park West, Southwest quadrant of 1-394 & Hwy 100 I have reviewed the revised information for the Final PUD for Central Park West located at the Southwest quadrant of 1-394 & Hwy 100. These revised documents are stamp "received Feb 04 2015". This PUD is unique due to how this project overlays the City boundary lines of Golden Valley and St. Louis Park. This review is written as if the whole project is located in Golden Valley. Moving forward it will be necessary to have discussions with St. Louis Park to coordinate code items and concerns pertaining to fire department site/building access, water supply and fire protection systems. The following is a copy of the information contained in my original letter dated November 17, 2014. 1 have "BOLDED" comments that have not been adequately addressed. Bolded italic print are comments to clarify concerns: Site Plan, Sheet 6040 Site access: Minnesota State Fire Code (MSFC) section 503 provides details on "Fire Apparatus Access Roads" and appendix D details dead-end fire apparatus access road turnaround configurations. This proposed development is bounded by Utica Avenue South (west side), 1- 394 / Hwy 100 service (north/northeast side), Lilac Drive (east side) and a private road connecting Lilac Drive and Utica Avenue South (south side) of the property. All of the perimeter roads are a minimum of 24 feet in width. These roads provide good access to the area. Proposed on the site are a total of six structures. On exhibit EX.1, EX.2, EX.3, EX.4 showing truck movements on site, EX.3 showing afire appliance depicts a ladder truck but the dimensions are more in line with a minipumper. Golden Valley's fire engines have an overall length of 34 feet, a wheel base of 16' 7" and a front overhang of 8' 2". GVFD's ladder truck has an overall length of 42 feet, a wheel base of 20' 7" and a front overhang of 6' 8". There is a private drive off of Utica Avenue South that provides access to the south office building, north office building and a parking ramp. The width of the road is 24 feet and is provided with what appears to be a compliant "hammer head" turn around, large enough to Page 1 of 3 accommodate fire apparatus, just as you reach the parking ramp. This configuration is acceptable. There is a private drive off of Utica Avenue South that provides access to the residential phase 1 and phase 2 buildings. This private drive does continue to the east and it connects to the 1- 394 / Hwy 100 service drive. This road varies in width from 20 to 24 feet and has several turning movements in the area between the three buildings. On the plan, "Note 5" indicates this is intended for service vehicles only. Where the private drive jogs, the turning radiuses combined with the width of the road makes it impossible to maneuver fire apparatus through this area thus creating two very long dead ends with no compliant turn around. Use of this private drive will be required to come closer to meeting the requirements of MSFC section 503.1.1 of providing access to within 150 feet of all portions of the buildings. This area should be reviewed and adjusted to provide adequate road width and proper turning radiuses to allow fire apparatus to drive through this area. In reviewing the requirements of MSFC section 503.1.1 of providing access to within 150 feet of all portions of the buildings there are three buildings that are compliant. They are the south office building, the residential building phase 2 and the hotel. The other buildings have varying degrees of not meeting this code requirement. It should be noted that the Fire Code Official is authorized to increase this dimension if the building is protected throughout with a fire sprinkler system. In reviewing both the parking ramp and the north office tower there is about 150 feet of building exterior that does not meet code. The Residential phase 2 building has about 200 feet of building exterior that exceeds the 150 feet requirement. Utility Plan, Sheet 6060 Water Supply and Fire Protection Systems: This site has six proposed structures ranging from 6 to 11 stories above grade and several have underground parking. There is no indication of the proposed type of construction. Minnesota State Fire Code (MSFC) section 508 provides details on "Fire Protection Water Supplies" and appendix B and C detail "Fire -Flow Requirements for Buildings" and "Fire Hydrant Locations and Distribution". Based on assumptions on the type of construction and approximate square footages of the buildings, the MSFC requires a fire flow of approximately 6750 gallon per minute (gpm) to the site for any particular building. Assuming the buildings are protected with full NFPA 13 fire sprinkler systems, the MSFC allows the code official to reduce the required fire flow. For discussion purposes, it appears that the required fire flow could be reduced to 2000 gpm with an average spacing between fire hydrants of 450 feet. If the assumptions are incorrect, these calculations will need to be revised and this may require a higher water flow to the site and fire hydrants that are spaced closer together. This plan shows adding one fire hydrant between the two office buildings and parking ramp. This appears to be in a good location. This location appears to be approximately 100 feet from where a fire department connection might be located on each of the three buildings. Page 2 of 3 Other existing fire hydrants are shown on the plan. However, the plan does NOT clearly indicate the location of fire hydrants along Lilac Drive, so it appears that the average spacing is exceeded. Along the connecting road between Lilac Drive and Utica Avenue South the average spacing is exceeded and would require an additional fire hydrant. Along Utica Avenue South where it intersects with 16th Avenue South it appears that the 450 feet average spacing of fire hydrants along Utica Avenue South is exceeded. Is there a fire hydrant located at this location? The last area that appears to exceed the average fire hydrant spacing is along the private driveway that runs between Utica Avenue South and the 1-394 / Hwy 100 service drive. A fire hydrant needs to be added somewhere on site between the two residential buildings and the hotel. The proposed fire water services to the five proposed buildings appears to be adequate. It is not clear as to how fire suppression water will be provided to the 7 level parking garage. If you have any questions, please contact me at 763-593-8065, or e-mail jcrelly@goldenvalleymn.gov Page 3 of 3 FEB 0 2015 TRAVEL DEMAND MANAGEMENT PLAN The West End Redevelopment Central Park West St. Louis Park, MN Golden Valley, MN Prepared for: DLC Residential, LLC Central Park West, LLC Prepared by: Kimley)))Horn February 2015 INTRODUCTION This document serves as the Travel Demand Management (TDM) Plan for the Central Park West Site within the West End Redevelopment located in the southwest quadrant of 1-394 and TH 100 (Figure 1). As expressed in this document, DLC Residential is committed to applying this TDM Plan to the proposed residential, hotel, and office buildings. The cities of St. Louis Park and Golden Valley have established an overlay zoning district and a joint task force to address congestion mitigation strategies. The Task Force reviews Travel Demand Management (TDM) Plans for development in the established 1-394 overlay zoning district. The Central Park West West End Redevelopment site lies within Zone A of the overlay district (City of St. Louis Park Code, Article IV, Sections 36-321 through 36-330). The Central Park West project consists of approximately 13.5 acres of new development on the site of previously razed office buildings. The Cities of Golden Valley and St. Louis Park each have jurisdiction within the site. The Central Park West Development will consist of a 199 unit apartment building, a 164 unit apartment building, an up to 150 room hotel, and up to 706,706 square feet of office space in two new office buildings. Construction of the first apartment building is anticipated to begin in spring 2015. Construction of the remaining residential, hotel, and office buildings will be phased with all construction anticipated to be completed by 2020. EXISTING CONDITIONS AND ALTERNATIVE TRANSIT OPPORTUNITIES Pedestrian and Bicycle The Central Park West development Site currently contains some sidewalk infrastructure along the south side of Wayzata Boulevard and the west side of Utica Avenue. The land on the proposed development is currently vacant and contains informal gravel lots off of unofficial curb cuts, old bituminous parking lots for the razed office buildings, and other vacant land. Utica Avenue and Wayzata Boulevard currently contain no dedicated bicycle infrastructure. However, the site is located a short distance from the Cedar Lake Trail, a bicycle and pedestrian pathway that runs from downtown Minneapolis to Chanhassen and other southwestern suburban communities. The Cedar Lake Trail carries a significant amount of commuter and recreational bicyclists. The Phase I area of the West End Development contains various pedestrian and bicycle amenities. Sidewalks were constructed along both sides of West 16th Street and West End Boulevard, as well as adjoining sidewalks to the grocer tenant and the main passageway from West End Boulevard to Park Place Boulevard. Some sidewalks are separated from the street by pervious green space, and others contain various urban design elements like potters, benches, street lighting, waste receptacles, and artistic bollards. Crosswalks are designated by various brick and stone material that differs from the bituminous roadway. Sidewalk space is lacking on Duke Drive east of the main shopping street. Although there is no designated bike lane infrastructure on the roadways, bike racks are located in front of the grocery tenant and near other retail tenants throughout the development. Bike racks and shower facilities are available at the Moneygram building and the 1600 Towers south of the development for tenants who bike to work. Transit The area is currently served by several bus routes operated by Metro Transit. The routes that serve the area are listed below: • Route 9: The route 9 bus serves the site along Park Place Boulevard and Wayzata Boulevard, and also has limited service along Highway 100. This local bus service connects to Cedar Lake Road and travels west to County Road 73. It also provides service into Golden Valley to the north and east of the TMP area, and moves into downtown Minneapolis. It continues through downtown and terminates in south Minneapolis at the 46th Street Blue Line LRT Station. Service is offered seven days a week all year. Buses on this route run from approximately 5:00 AM to 1:00 AM during the week. The route contains 15 to 20 minute headways during rush hour, 30 minute headways midday and evenings, and 30 to 60 minute headways on the weekend. • Route 604: The route 604 bus runs west from the Park Place/1-394 Park & Ride lot near the Xenia -Park Place interchange down Wayzata Boulevard to the Louisiana Avenue Transit Center. It then continues south on Louisiana Avenue through St. Louis Park to Excelsior Boulevard, where it moves to and terminates at the Excelsior & Grand shopping district. Service is offered Monday through Friday during rush hour and midday periods, and runs from 7:30 AM to 4:30 PM. The route operates approximately once per hour during the service time. • Route 649: The route 649 bus loops along Wayzata Boulevard, Park Place Boulevard, Cedar Lake Road and Louisiana Avenue and provides limited -stop service along 1-394 into downtown Minneapolis. Service is offered Monday through Friday during rush hour periods. It operates from approximately 6:15 AM to 8:30 AM, and from 3:30 PM to 6:3013M. The route operates every 30 minutes during the service time. To encourage residents and visitors to utilize transit, expansion of existing routes — such as offering the 649 route every day during the week — should occur to serve the site. Adding new routes that run directly from the West End into downtown Minneapolis would also help facilitate higher transit ridership to and from the development. Surrounding Amenities The Central Park West development Site is across the street from The Shops at West End, which contain various types of restaurants, a movie theater, a Cub Foods grocery store, and other retail outlets. The site is also within walking distance to several other stores and restaurants across Park Place Boulevard, as well as an Olive Garden restaurant at the corner of Wayzata Boulevard and Utica Avenue. In addition, the existing Moneygram building has a fitness center facility complete with showers and locker rooms that is available to employees in the Moneygram and 1600 Tower buildings. The site is also near newly finished and currently under construction apartment buildings north of 16th Street, as well as a Hilton -based Homewood Suites hotel. A number of roadway improvements were required by the AUAR and traffic study completed for the Central Park West development. The approved project site plan resulted in a refinement of the improvements needed and these are outlined in the developer's agreement between the City of St. Louis Park, the City of Golden Valley, and DLC Residential. The majority of the required improvements will be constructed between 2015 and 2020. As a result of these improvements being implemented, the intersections in and around the project are expected to operate at acceptable (LOS D or better) levels of service with the redevelopment. Planned Road Improvements Utica Avenue: Reconstruct existing section of Utica Avenue between Wayzata Boulevard and the Moneygram building entrance. Build four total vehicular lanes with a center grassy median separating northbound and southbound traffic. Construct a privately owned but publically accessible linear park past 16`h Street that will assist pedestrians and bicyclists to access the various buildings. These road and park improvements will be designed and constructed by DLC Residential. Planned Trail and Sidewalk Improvements In addition to road improvements a number of sidewalks will be added for pedestrian and bicycle mobility. The Cities will: • Construct the sidewalk on the south side of Wayzata Avenue The developer has agreed to: Construct the linear park and fund all urban design elements within its grounds, including decorative lighting, benches, trash receptacles, and general open space that will be accessible to the public. The overall goal of this plan is to reduce potential traffic congestion that will come with the proposed development. This will occur by maintaining or improving acceptable levels of service on the roadways within and adjacent to the project site, minimizing the projected number of trips through adjacent intersections during the PM peak hour, and continuously encouraging alternative transportation use within each component in the development. The general road improvements mixed with pedestrian amenities, bicycle infrastructure, and better transit service will all assist in achieving the goal. PROPOSED TMP STRATEGIES DLC Residential in coordination with building managers will pursue the following objectives and strategies to achieve its Traffic Management Plan. Objectives and Strategies TDM Friendly Design Mixed Use Development: A hotel and residential component have been proposed for the subjected site in phase one, and the proposed office space will be constructed in a future phase. The hotel and residential uses will help overall traffic flow because the two uses have traditionally different traffic flow peak times during the day. The Shops at West End will also encourage residents and hotel guests alike to stay nearby for shopping, entertainment, and grocery needs. This will reduce the number of vehicular trips that leave the site in the PM peak hour. Commuters to the office buildings in the future will counter traffic flows from residents, thus decreasing the likelihood of concentrated roadway congestion. • Residential Component: In the 1-394 Overlay Zoning District language for both St. Louis Park and Golden Valley, it is encouraged to develop residential uses within the corridor to reduce PM peak traffic volumes in one direction. This development includes two separate 6 -story apartment buildings containing 363 dwelling units. Residents in these units will likely either be reverse commuting from areas other than the West End vicinity in the afternoon, or will be working in the nearby office buildings, thus helping reduce PM traffic congestion. • Shared Parking: A mixed-use development of this type provides opportunities for shared parking among different uses, reducing the overall number of parking spaces needed on-site. The fully built out pedestrian infrastructure within the site will help site users access shops, hotels, and residences by walking instead of driving. A parking structure in the east side of the property will help alleviate office parking concerns and spillover, and will improve direct traffic flow into the development. • Designated Hotel Guest Parking: Hotel employees will be incited to park in areas that won't create parking lot bottlenecks, and will be encouraged to seek alternative commuting methods like biking, walking, or taking transit. This will allow the hotel to hold sufficient parking spaces for its guests, thus reducing internal vehicular trips (guests driving around to find a more convenient parking space). The hotel lot will also have specific signage that will discourage non - guests from parking in that area. • Underground Residential Parking: The development plan calls for underground parking for residents in the apartment buildings, thus reducing parking conflicts in surrounding hotel and office parking areas. • Delivery Truck Reductions: Deliveries via truck will be minimized due to the general lack of need for shipments to the residential buildings. Delivery Trucks will be restricted to deliver between 10 pm and 8 am. Trucks needed for any use on the site will enter at the curb cut near the corner of Wayzata Boulevard and Lilac Lane. Garbage collection will be carefully scheduled during the day to minimize impacts on residents and public. • Pedestrian Access: Sidewalks will be provided on both sides of Utica Avenue and on the south side of Wayzata Boulevard. Sidewalks within the site include the multi -use "woonerf" space and paved areas in the linear park. All sidewalks will have safe crossings at Utica Avenue so residents, hotel guests, and hotel workers can walk to nearby shops and restaurants instead of drive. • Bicycle Access: Wayfinding signs will direct bicycle riders to ride south to the Cedar Lake Trail. Bicycles will also be allowed within the "woonerf" and linear park space. Bicycle parking will be included within Central Park West near both residential buildings and the hotel building. St. Louis Park requires that bicycle parking spaces equal 10% of total vehicle parking spaces. Approximately 477 bicycle spaces are planned to be placed within the site. Approximately 212 bicycle spaces will be installed the Phase 1 and 2 Residential Buildings, with the remaining 265 spaces installed for the Office. Additional required spaces can be provided if a need is identified. Participate with Regional TDM Organizations to Provide Information on Transportation Alternatives • Create an office Commuter Benefits Coordinator (CBC) position to coordinate with Metro Transit and officials from trail network entities. • Inform residential concierge workers about transportation alternatives, who will then be able to notify residents about transit, biking, and walking options. Have concierge set up special commuter challenges at certain times of the year to encourage residents to try non -vehicular commutes. • Inform hotel concierge workers about surrounding transportation amenities, who will then be able to advise guests to walk— instead of drive —to entertainment. • Display transit and trail maps in locations within both residential buildings, the hotel, and future office buildings. Support and Promote Bicycling and Walking as Alternatives • Build and maintain pedestrian -friendly space within and alongside development site. • Prioritize pedestrian movements over automobile movements at intersections by designating crosswalks with different paving material and building pedestrian warning lights. • Place bike wayfinding signs along Utica Avenue and within the linear park that direct bicyclists to the Cedar Lake Trail. • Actively display updated biking information, such as commuting tips and trail maps, in the lobbies of each building. • Add a fitness center and showers into one of the office buildings during the next development phase. These amenities will be accessible to employees who wish to walk or bike to work. Support and Promote Transit as an Alternative • Encourage Metro Transit to increase frequency of existing service or add new direct service into downtown Minneapolis from turnaround area. • Concierges in the apartment buildings and the hotel will facilitate the sale of bus passes to residents, and will provide detailed transit information to guests. The CBC will encourage office tenants to use alternative commuting methods, and will sell bus passes to employees. Support and Promote Carpooling and Vanpooling • Have apartment concierge send surveys to residents to see if a potential carpool pairing would be possible. • Distribute carpool and vanpool service information to residents. • Look into viability to add parking spaces for rideshare services, such as ZipCar or HourCar. Monitoring Once apartment units are 75% occupied, send survey to residents to gather interest and supply information about alternative transportation. • Have apartment concierge send periodic, bi-annual surveys to residents to discover transportation usage data. • Evaluate effectiveness of strategies and modify the plan accordingly. TDM IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Developer(s) will be responsible to implement this plan upon completion of the Central Park West development. These obligations will run with the land in the event that portions of the project are sold to third parties. The steps to plan implementation are outlined below: 1) Apartment and hotel concierge employees will be trained to serve as transportation coordinators and to follow plan implementation. These persons will coordinate with each other and with the Commuter Benefits Coordinator (CBC) in the future office buildings. 2) Once the hotel is operational and the apartment buildings are 75% occupied, the concierges will conduct a commuter survey to estimate participation in alternative modes of transportation. 3) The concierges will work with Metro Transit to inform all tenants regarding all alternative transportation options available to them for commuting. 4) The concierges will continuously encourage guests and residents to utilize and walk to the nearby entertainment, shopping, dining, and grocery tenants instead of drive to others. 5) After the City completes an updated traffic study of the area with the implemented road improvements, DLC Residential, building concierges, and the CBC will meet with staff from the City of St. Louis Park and the City of Golden Valley to determine if traffic is operating at acceptable levels. TRAVEL MANAGEMENT MEASURE STATUS TARGET DATE TDM Friendly Design Mixed Use Development — establish uses with separate peak traffic flows Residential Component — build apartments nearby to lessen PM traffic Shared parking — between hotel and residential uses Hotel guest parking — ease of access for guests Underground apartment parking — ease of access for residents Delivery truck restrictions — innate lack of need for delivery services & restricted delivery times Pedestrian Access — establish good sidewalk connections Bicycle Access — establish good biking infrastructure TDM Organization Collaboration Create CBC position for office buildings Train residential concierges Train hotel concierges Display non-vehicular transportation information Incentivize residents to commute using alternative transportation Promote Walking & Biking Build and maintain good pedestrian spaces Create designated biking infrastructure Place wayfinding signs for bicyclists Actively update walking & biking information within building lobbies Promote Transit Use Encourage Metro Transit to extend service or add new service to area Have concierges facilitate selling bus passes to residents, and providing information to hotel guests. Promote Car/Vanpooling Have concierges pair residents for potential carpool arrangements TRAVEL MANAGEMENT MEASURE STATUS TARGET DATE Distribute carpool & vanpool information to residents Look into viability for rideshare service implementation Monitoring Send commuting survey to residents once apartment is 75% occupied and hotel is open Send occasional commuting surveys (twice a year) to residents to gather commuting trends Evaluate effectiveness of strategies and modify plan in coordination with concierges, CBC, and officials from the Cities of St. Louis Park and Golden Valley 41 FEB 0 4 2015 Kimley>>> Horn r �r Date: January 15, 2015, Revised January 19, 2015 To: Emily Goellner, City of Golden Valley From: John Crawford, PE, PTOE, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. (612-294-7264) Subject: West End AUAR Analysis Update — Response to City of Golden Valley Letter (dated December 26, 2014) PURPOSE OF MEMO Kimley-Horn previously provided an analysis update to the West End AUAR, dated October 30, 2014. As part of the review process, the City of Golden Valley requested additional traffic studies to be conducted to update the information based on current traffic volumes. The City of Golden Valley's requests included counting existing traffic volumes, evaluating the build -out conditions traffic operations, along with a discussion on traffic calming, and providing support to Golden Valley staff for a neighborhood meeting. This memo summarizes results of the updated p.m. peak -hour traffic analyses for the purposes of responding to the City of Golden Valley's requests. This analysis maintains the proposed land uses evaluated as part of the analysis update submitted on October 30, 2014. Results of the analyses were compared to the thresholds established in the 2007 AUAR and 2013 AUAR Update to ensure the proposed development is in conformance with the AUAR and would not incur additional impacts or require additional mitigation measures. PROJECT INFORMATION The original AUAR was approved in 2007 and studied multiple scenarios with varying levels and types of development, but Scenario 1 most closely represents the actual plans for the West End development and has been consistently used as a comparison in other analyses. The land uses and intensities evaluated for Scenario 1 included: 2007 AUAR Scenario 1 • 1.0 million square feet (SF) of office space • 400,000 SF of retail space • 250 condo units Pursuant to Minnesota Rules 4410.3610 Subp. 7, an AUAR and plan for mitigation must be revised every five years until all development in the study area has received final approval. Since the study area has not been fully developed, an update to the West End AUAR was completed in October 2013. The 2013 update evaluated two additional scenarios, which included: 2013 AUAR Update Scenario 1A • 1.1 million SF of office space • 346,674 SF of retail space • 454 apartment units K.imley>>> Horn page 2 2013 AUAR Update Scenario 1 B • 1.1 million SF of office space • 346,674 SF of retail space • 704 apartment units As of August 2014, the existing, built development is comprised of 35,396 SF of 2"d story office space, 346,674 SF of retail space, and 453 apartment units. In October 2014, an analysis was undertaken to update the AUAR to incorporate a revised development plan for the West End Development. The revised plan proposed to reduce the amount of office space, remove two existing restaurants, increase the amount of apartment units, and add hotel rooms. The proposed plan includes a range of development for the remaining office space (578,000 SF to 706,706 SF) and apartment units (up to 400 units), and the new hotel (150 to 200 rooms). For the purpose of the October 2014 analysis and this analysis, the total West End Development was assumed to consist of the higher end of the proposed ranges of development and included: October 2014 AUAR Update Revised Scenario 1A • 742,102 square feet (SF) of office space • 346,674 SF of retail space • 853 apartment units • 200 hotel rooms Project Trip Generation The trip generation potential of the West End Development was updated based on the revised development plan documented in the October 2014 AUAR Update. As shown in Table 1, the revised development plan is expected to generate a total of 2,536 two-way, p.m. peak -hour trips (1,050 entering and 1,486 exiting). The revised trip generation indicates a slight increase in the amount of two-way trips for the a.m. peak hour and a slight decrease in the amount of two-way trips for the p.m. peak hour, as compared to the approved 2007 AUAR Scenario 1. After removing the existing, built development, the trip generation potential for the remaining, un -built development was calculated to be 1,085 two-way p.m. peak -hour trips (324 entering and 761 exiting). For the purposes of this analysis, these trips were distributed onto the roadway system and evaluated at the study area locations. A summary of the remaining trip generation is provided in Table 2 below. 2550 University Avenue West, Suite 238N. St. Paul, MN 55114 Kimley»>Horn Table 1 — Total Project Trip Generation Summary' Revised Scenario 1A Total Land Use Land Use Size Daily Trips AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour In Out In Out PM Peak Hour In Out Office 742,102 square feet 5,606 788 108 151 738 Retail (2 Restaurants Removed) 346,674 square feet 14,863 218 139 624 676 Condos 0 units 0 0 0 0 0 Apartments 853 units 5,672 85 341 331 178 Hotels 200 rooms 1,634 63 43 61 59 Trip Generation Subtotal Multi -Use Reduction (-10%) 27,775 1,154 631 1,167 1,651 Multi -Use Reduction (-10%) TOTAL -2,778 -115 -63 -117 -165 TOTAL Percent Change from approved 2007 AUAR Scenario 1 24,997 5% -12% = $... 61% W 16% , ;i -9% AUAR Trip Generation Limits 1,320 528 1,167 1,883 'Trip generation calculations as documented in the 2007 West End AUAR, based on ITE Trip Generation, 7"' Edition (2003). Current trip generation calculations based on the most recent version of ITE Trip Generation, 9h Edition (2012). Table 2 — Remaining Project Trip Generation Summary' Revised Scenario 1A Remaining Land Use Land Use Size Daily Trips AM Peak Hour In Out PM Peak Hour In Out Office 706,706 square feet 5,339 751 102 144 703 Retail (2 Restaurants Removed) 0 square feet 0 0 0 0 0 Condos 0 units 0 0 0 0 0 Apartments 400 units 2,660 40 160 155 84 Hotels 200 rooms 1,634 63 43N324 59 Trip Generation Subtotal 9,633 854 305846 Multi -Use Reduction (-10%) -963 -85 -31-85 TOTAL 8,670 `+. i 'Trip generation calculations as documented in the 2007 West End AUAR, based on ITE Trip Generation, 7' Edition (2003). Current trip generation calculations based on the most recent version of ITE Trip Generation, 9' Edition (2012). Project Trip Distribution The trip distribution of the remaining West End Development project trips was based upon the distribution documented in the previous AUAR traffic studies. For the purpose of this analysis, and to 2550 University Avenue West, Suite 238N, St. Paul, MN 55114 Kimley>»Horn provide a conservative analysis, the assignment of project trips was modified slightly to include an additional five percent (5%) of remaining project trips traversing to and from the east along 1-394 via Wayzata Boulevard. The result of this modification increased the amount of project trips on Wayzata Boulevard from 10% to 15%. In addition, five percent (5%) of project traffic was assumed to traverse to and from the south along Quentin Avenue. The result of this modification increased the amount of project trips on Quentin Avenue from 0% to 5%. Figure 1 illustrates the project trip distribution and is provided as an attachment to this letter. DATA COLLECTION Existing Conditions Wayzata Boulevard is a frontage road serving 1-394 and functions as a minor collector roadway in the City of Golden Valley Transportation Plan. Wayzata Boulevard is a two-lane, undivided roadway through the City of Golden Valley. The posted speed limit for the section of Wayzata Boulevard passing beneath the TH100 overpass is 30 mph. The section of Wayzata Boulevard that continues north and east of the intersection of Wayzata Boulevard & Quentin Avenue, as well as Quentin Avenue to the south, both have posted speed limits of 35 mph. Traffic Count Data Turning movement counts were performed at the study intersections of Wayzata Boulevard & Quentin Avenue, Wayzata Boulevard & France Avenue West, and Wayzata Boulevard & France Avenue East during the p.m. peak period (4:00 PM to 6:00 PM) on January 6, 2015. In addition, a 24-hour traffic count was performed at the intersection of Wayzata Boulevard & Quentin Avenue on January 13, 2015. Figure 2 illustrates the p.m. peak -hour traffic volumes and Figure 3 illustrates the average daily traffic (ADT) volumes. Both figures are provided as attachments to this letter. Speed Data Existing speed data was collected as part of the Wayzata Boulevard South Frontage Road — Traffic Volume and Speed study, dated December 11, 2006. As previously discussed, the section of Wayzata Boulevard between Quentin Avenue and France Avenue has a posted speed limit of 35 mph. The 85th percentile speed (a speed at which 85% of traffic are traveling equal to or less than) is generally used as an indicator of the appropriate speed limit. The results of the speed study indicate that the 85th percentile speed along Wayzata Boulevard between Quentin Avenue and France Avenue is between 1 mph less and 6 mph more than the posted speed limit of 35 mph, with the average 85th percentile speed equal to 39 mph. Intersection Sight Distance Existing intersection sight distance was reviewed at the cross -street intersections along Wayzata Boulevard based on aerial photography and a field visit. Based on this review, there are several intersections which appear to have existing obstructions limiting the sight distance of motorists. Pictures taken at each of the study locations are provided as an attachment to this letter. 2550 University Avenue West, Suite 238N, St. Paul, MN 55114 Kimley»>Horn ANALYSIS SUMMARY Em a Existing (2015) Conditions Traffic Analysis The existing conditions intersection analysis was based upon methodologies defined by the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM 2010) for unsignalized intersections. The analysis was performed utilizing the most recent version of the Highway Capacity Software (HCS 2010). Existing p.m. peak -hour traffic volumes and study area intersection geometrics are illustrated in Figure 2. Each of the study area intersections is currently unsignalized, with side -street STOP control. The intersection operations analysis was conducted for the existing p.m. peak -hour to determine how the study area intersections currently operate under existing traffic conditions. The results of the analysis are shown in Table 3 and indicate that the eastbound approach of the Wayzata Boulevard & Quentin Avenue intersection is currently operating below an acceptable LOS. Documentation of the intersection analysis is provided as an attachment to this letter. Table 3 Existing (2015) Conditions Intersection Analysis Summary LOS Intersection LOS* Wayzata Boulevard & Quentin Avenue E Wayzata Boulevard & France Avenue West C Wayzata Boulevard & France Avenue East C *TL... LJt'Rfi r___ __• _. -e __ .. .. I IV LIVIVI UUes n0L Pruviae an overan ws for unsignalized intersections. The LOS represents the worst side -street approach LOS. Background (2016) Conditions Traffic Analysis The background (non -project) traffic growth rate percentage of 0.5% utilized in the 2007 West End AUAR was utilized in this analysis. This growth rate was applied to the existing volumes at the study area intersections to estimate background traffic volumes for year 2016, which are illustrated in Figure 2. The background conditions intersection analysis utilized a methodology similar to the existing conditions analysis. The results of the analysis are shown in Table 4 and indicate that the eastbound approach of the Wayzata Boulevard & Quentin Avenue intersection is expected to operate below an acceptable LOS for background (2016) traffic conditions. Documentation of the intersection analysis is provided as an attachment to this letter. Table 4 Backqround (2016) Conditions Intersection Anni..cia Ciimmm— UOeS FICA pi(mue an overan w� ror unsignalized intersections. The LOS represents the worst side -street approach LOS. 2550 University Avenue West, Suite 238N, St. Paul, MN 55114 Intersection LOS* Wayzata Boulevard & Quentin Avenue E Wayzata Boulevard & France Avenue West C Wayzata Boulevard & France Avenue East *TL... "t'K 1 r___ '--i ------°-�_ .. . -- - - C UOeS FICA pi(mue an overan w� ror unsignalized intersections. The LOS represents the worst side -street approach LOS. 2550 University Avenue West, Suite 238N, St. Paul, MN 55114 Kimley»>Horn Future Total (2016) Conditions Traffic Analysis The remaining project traffic (from Table 2) was distributed onto the study area network and added to the background traffic to produce the future total traffic volumes, which are illustrated in Figure 2. The future total conditions intersection analysis utilized a methodology similar to the background conditions analysis. The results of the analysis are shown in Table 5 and indicate that the intersection of Wayzata Boulevard & Quentin Avenue will require turn -lane improvements to be constructed for the intersection to operate at an acceptable LOS. The required turn -lane improvements consist of an exclusive southbound right -turn lane and an exclusive eastbound right -turn lane. Documentation of the intersection analysis is provided as an attachment to this letter. Table 5 Future Total (2016) Conditions Intersection Anal sis Su y mmary Intersection LOS* Wayzata Boulevard & Quentin Avenue F/D Wayzata Boulevard & France Avenue West C Wayzata Boulevard & France Avenue East D *Tho urrnA A� .,..E ....•;,4 __.. �.- "OL pvviue air overall QUO ror unsignauzea intersections. The LOS represents the worst side -street approach LOS. LOS/LOS — indicates the LOS before and after improvement A supplemental analysis was performed to determine the operational impacts of installing a multi -way stop at the intersection of Wayzata Boulevard & Quentin Avenue. The result of this analysis indicates that the intersection would operate at an overall acceptable LOS with the construction of an exclusive eastbound right -turn lane and the installation of multi -way stop control. The construction of an exclusive southbound right -turn is not needed based on this analysis. Preliminary Signal Warrant Analysis A preliminary signal warrant analysis, based on the traffic volume criteria of the Minnesota (MN) MUTCD (December 2011), was conducted at the intersection of Wayzata Boulevard & Quentin Avenue. The intersection is currently stop controlled on the west leg (Wayzata Boulevard) and free flow on the north leg (Wayzata Boulevard) and south leg (Quentin Avenue). The posted speed limit on the north and south legs (major street) of the intersection is 35 mph and on the west leg (minor street) is 30 mph. All intersection approaches are single lane, with no exclusive turn lanes. For the purposes of this analysis, Warrant 1 — Eight -Hour Vehicular Volume and Warrant 2 — Four - Hour Vehicular Volume were evaluated. Based on a review of the traffic count data collected on January 13, 2015, zero (0) hours meet the Warrant 1 volume criteria and 1 hour meets the Warrant 2 volume criteria. Therefore, a traffic signal is not warranted at this location. A summary of the preliminary signal warrant analysis is provided as an attachment to this letter. Multi -Way Stop Control Warrant Analysis A multi -way stop control warrant analysis was conducted based on criteria of the MN MUTCD (December 2011), which identifies safety and volume criteria that should be considered to determine the need for the installation of a multi -way STOP sign. The criteria include: kimley-horn.com 2550 University Avenue West, Suite 238N, St. Paul, MN 55114 Kimley»>Horn WIM • Five or more reported crashes in a 12 -month period that are susceptible to correction by a multi -way stop installation. Such crashes include right -turn and left -turn collisions as well as right-angle collisions. • Minimum Volumes: • The vehicular volume entering the intersection from the major street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 300 vehicles per hour for any 8 hours of an average day; and • The combined vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle volume entering the intersection from the minor street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 200 units per hour for the same 8 hours, with an average delay to minor -street vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle during the highest hour; but • If the 85th -percentile approach speed of the major -street traffic exceeds 40 mph, the minimum vehicular volume warrants are 70 percent of the values provided above. Additionally, a multi -way stop may be considered if no single criterion is satisfied, but where the criterion above (excluding the 85th -percentile approach speed) are all satisfied to 80 percent of the minimum values. A review of the crash data from MnCMAT indicates that during the previous 10 years (2004 to 2014), there were two (2) crashes at the Wayzata Boulevard & Quentin Avenue intersection. Neither crash was associated with a fatality or injury; both crashes involved property damage only. A review of the traffic volume data collected on January 13, 2015, indicates that 3 hours out of the required eight (8) hours meet the volume warrant criteria for a multi -way stop. As previously discussed, the average 85th percentile speed is less than 40 mph. The results of the analysis indicate that a multi -way stop is not warranted at this location based on the crash history and existing volume data, which is consistent with the Intersection Control Evaluation prepared by SHE for MnDOT on February 11, 2010. A summary of the multi -way stop evaluation is provided as an attachment to this letter. Comparison of 2007 and 2015 Results As indicated above, the results of the analyses indicate the need for the following mitigation: • Wayzata Boulevard & Quentin Avenue • Install a southbound right -turn lane. • Install an eastbound right -turn lane. These mitigation measures at the intersection of Wayzata Boulevard & Quentin Avenue are consistent with the mitigation measures identified in the 2007 AUAR prepared by SRF. A complete list of the improvements documented in the 2007 AUAR, and whether the improvement is complete or not, is provided below: • Park Place Boulevard/1-394 North Ramp 2550 University Avenue West; Suite 238N, St. Paul, MN 55114 Kimley>»Horn Em • Install a westbound right -turn lane to provide a dual right -turn lane. In addition, modify the signal phasing to provide a right -turn overlap phase and optimize timing. Not Complete. • Park Place Boulevard/1-394 South Ramp • Install an eastbound right -turn lane to provide a dual right -turn lane. In addition, modify the signal phasing to provide a right -turn overlap phase. Not Complete. • Install a northbound right -turn lane to provide a dual right -turn lane. In addition, extend the northbound right -turn lane to Wayzata Boulevard and modify phasing to provide a right -turn overlap phase and optimize timing. Not Complete. • Widen the entrance ramp onto eastbound 1-394 to maintain a two-lane entrance onto the collector -distributor roadway. Not Complete. • Park Place Boulevard/Wayzata Boulevard • Install a southbound left -turn lane to provide dual left -turn lanes. In addition, widen eastbound Wayzata Boulevard to accommodate the dual left -turn lane. Completed. • Install a westbound right -turn lane to provide a dual right -turn lane. In addition, modify the signal phasing to provide a right -turn overlap phase and optimize timing. Completed. • Install an additional northbound through lane beginning at north of Wayzata Boulevard and ending at the 1-394 South Ramp. Not Complete. • Install an additional northbound through lane beginning at West 16`h Street, connecting to the through lane recommended at Wayzata Boulevard. Not Complete. • Install an exclusive northbound right -turn lane. Not Complete. • Park Place Boulevard/West 16`h Street • Extend the existing southbound left -turn lane to provide 300 feet of storage. Completed. • Modify the existing northbound shared through/right-turn lane to a through lane only. Completed. • Install a northbound right -turn lane. Completed. • Modify the westbound approach to provide dual left -turn lanes, one through lane and a right -turn lane. In addition, modify the signal phasing to provide a right -turn overlap phase. Completed. • Modify the eastbound shared through/left-turn lane to an exclusive left -turn lane to provide dual left -turn lanes. Completed. • Modify the existing exclusive eastbound right -turn lane to provide a shared through/right- turn lane. Completed. • Eliminate the current split phasing and optimize the signal timing. Completed. • Park Place Boulevard/Gamble Drive 2550 University Avenue West, Suite 238N, St. Paul, MN 55114 Kimley»>Horn • Modify the existing westbound shared through/left-turn lane to an exclusive left -turn lane to provide dual left -turn lanes. Completed. • Convert the existing westbound right -turn lane to a through lane and install an exclusive right -turn lane on this approach. In addition, modify the signal phasing to provide a right - turn overlap phase. Completed. • Eliminate the current split phasing and optimize the signal timing. Completed. • Quentin Avenue/Wayzata Boulevard • Install a southbound right -turn lane. Not Complete. • Install an eastbound right -turn lane. Not Complete. • Quentin Avenue/Old Cedar Lake Road • Install a northbound left -turn lane. Not Complete. • Modify the current striping to provide a southbound right -turn lane. Not Complete. • TH 100 East Frontage Road/Old Cedar Lake Road • Modify and widen the westbound approach and re -stripe as two lanes. Not Complete. • Widen the west end of the concrete island to create a 90 -degree T -intersection. Not Complete. TRAFFIC CALMING AND SAFETY MEASURES A study to evaluate traffic calming improvements along Wayzata Boulevard between TH 100 and France Avenue was conducted by SRF on July 12, 2007. The purpose of the study was to address existing vehicle speeds, limited sight distance, and pedestrian concerns along Wayzata Boulevard. In addition, a Traffic Safety Improvements study was conducted by SHE for Wayzata Boulevard in October 2007. Several of the traffic calming strategies recommended as part of the Traffic Safety Improvements study were utilized by the City of Golden Valley to apply for grant funding in February 2008. Mitigation measures to alleviate the existing vehicle speed, limited sight distance, and pedestrian safety issues were previously identified as part of the Wayzata Boulevard Traffic Calming Options study, dated July 12, 2007, and the Wayzata Boulevard Traffic Safety Improvements study, dated October 2007. The recommendations proposed as part of that study include: • Brush Trimming • All -Way Stop Control • Curb Extensions and Narrower Traffic Lanes • Intersection Redesign and Pavement Markings As discussed in the Data Collection section of this memo, limited sight distance exists at several of the cross -street intersections along Wayzata Boulevard. The recommended traffic safety improvements identified above should continue to be pursued by the City of Golden Valley to alleviate 12550 University Avenue West, Suite 238N, St. Paul, MN 55114 Kim ey>>)Horn Page 10 these existing safety issues. To date, only one of the recommended improvements has been constructed - the curb extension at the pedestrian bridge. A review of the crash data from MnCMAT indicates that during the previous 10 years (2004 to 2014), there were two (2) crashes at the Wayzata Boulevard & Quentin Avenue intersection. Neither crash was associated with a fatality or injury; both crashes involved property damage only. SUMMARY Analysis Results: The results of the traffic operations analysis indicate that the intersection of Wayzata Boulevard & Quentin Avenue will require turn -lane improvements to be constructed for the intersection to operate at an acceptable LOS. The required turn -lane improvements consist of an exclusive southbound right -turn lane and an exclusive eastbound right -turn lane. A supplemental analysis was performed to determine the operational impacts of installing a multi -way stop at the intersection of Wayzata Boulevard & Quentin Avenue. The result of this analysis indicates that the intersection would operate at an overall acceptable LOS with the construction of an exclusive eastbound right -turn lane and the installation of multi -way stop control. The construction of an exclusive southbound right -turn is not needed based on this analysis. In addition to the traffic operations analysis, a signal warrant analysis and a multi -way stop analysis were performed to determine the need for a traffic signal or a multi -way stop. The results of the analyses indicate that neither a traffic signal nor multi -way stop is warranted at the intersection of Wayzata Boulevard & Quentin Avenue at this time. Traffic Calming and Safety: Mitigation measures to alleviate the existing vehicle speed, limited sight distance, and pedestrian safety issues were previously identified as part of the Wayzata Boulevard Traffic Calming Options study, dated July 12, 2007, and the Wayzata Boulevard Traffic Safety Improvements study, dated October 2007. As discussed in the Data Collection section of this memo, limited sight distance exists at several of the cross -street intersections along Wayzata Boulevard. The recommended traffic safety improvements identified above should continue to be pursued by the City of Golden Valley to alleviate these existing safety issues. In addition, MnCMAT data during the previous ten years (2004 to 2014) indicates two (2) crashes at the intersection of Wayzata Boulevard & Quentin Avenue. 2550 University Avenue West, Suite 238N, St. Paul, MN 55114 ATTACHMENTS Legend — Study Roadway Study Intersection tXX% Entering Distribution N (XX%) Exiting Distribution v NOT TO SCALE N N R 0 m L Wayzata Boulevard 4- 15.0% r 4 j 4 r Driveway (15.0%) 41 1+ (15.0%) 1 * 14 Z H Z W 7 7 Q Q V V LL LL Wayzata Boulevard 1 (15.0%) s h t (5.0%) Sd CY a Figure 1 Project Trip Distribution Kim Iey>>> Horn West End Development Hennepin County, Minnesota 02015 N Lq (6 La E°'N d 02 0- O c > p U N O L c 0 W o o�U CL 41= get (get) <9el> (6 C J1 r oe (0e) <0e> e a a) pJenalnog e;ezABM <e> (e) e s h i f 3 anuany aaueJd o <Zl> Q0 zl y a <6l> (>4L) e4l L z (z) <z> r 96 (96) <96> t M anueAV aauej.1 0 > m m 0 m �a Y N � 4— 941 (L4l) <L4l> Ir09 (09) <9L> N oE (SS fa d E 0 <SSL> 11 anuand 4SL ..► h `,+ ugDant) 3 0) > > N <44L> (96) 96 O N ? ? N o C tm O O C > N" ._. �. >. y 'j j .N U A 7 3 Cl)nwm� 0 v � m L. � XT XXL � Z OI J /^ /1 Lu W �Z E QN Z Legend — Study Roadway Study Intersection XX Existing Volume (XX) Background Volume N <XX> Total Volume v NOT TO SCALE R N m 10 0 m L Wayzata Boulevard r .. j 4 t Driveway y h� s,,' hir► z z w � 3 a a' d d _ LL U. Wayzata ' Boulevard r 1 3,580 <1,900> (1,250) 1,240 (3,600) <1,150> (930) 920 <5,340> C d 7 CCYC 7 Q Figure 3 Kimley Daily Traffic Volumes -Z.' Horn West End Development ©2015 Hennepin County, Minnesota VOLUME DEVELOPMENT WORKSHEETS TRAFFIC VOLUMES AT STUDY INTERSECTION INTERSECTION: Wayzata Blvd & Quentin Ave COUNT DATE: January 6, 2015 TIME PERIOD: 4:45 p.m. - 5:45 p.m. PEAK HOUR FACTOR: 0.91 "EXISTING TRAFFIC" EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR EXISTINOCONIS orno 269 192I 1 1 60 746 154 95 "BACKGROUND TRAFFIC" EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR TOTAL "XESTEO" TRAFFIC o I 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 MON-PROJECT TAAFFIC 270 193 60 1 147 15s 95 "PROJECT TRAFFIC" LAND USE TYPE EBL ERT FRR WRI WRT WRR KIRI IJCT LIDO cci cor -- ---- --- — — .,oma Project Pa! - B Trips Not New 114 1 38 16 49 TOTAL PROJECT TRAFFIC j 114 1 38 1 16 0 0 49 TOTAL TRAFFIC i1 384 231 76 1 147 155 144 TRAFFIC VOLUMES AT STUDY INTERSECTION INTERSECTION: Wayzata Blvd & France Ave West COUNT DATE: January 6, 2015 TIME PERIOD: 4:45 p.m. - 5:45 p.m. PEAK HOUR FACTOR: 0.89 "EXISTING TRAFFIC" EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Raw Tumi"o!Mouements414 B 0 179 1 1 95 2 Peak Season Correctibn Factor . 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 EXISTING CONDITIONS 414 8 0 179 95 2 "BACKGROUND TRAFFIC" EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR TOTAL "VESTED" TRAFFLC o o o o o o eBIS TtrSUildout 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Yearly, Growth Rete 0.5% 1 0.5% 1 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% BACKGROUND TRAFFIC GROWTH 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 NOWPROJECT TRAFFIC 416 1 8 1 0 1 180 1 1 95 1 1 2 "PROJECT TRAFFIC" LAND USE TYPE EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NRL NRT NRR SRI ART ARM Project Pass -13y Trips ; Net New 114 49 TOTAL. PROJECT TRAFFIC. 114 0 0 49 1 0 0 TOTAL TRAFFIC 530 1 8 1 0 1 229 1 1 95 1 1 2 TRAFFIC VOLUMES AT STUDY INTERSECTION INTERSECTION: Wayzata Blvd & France Ave East COUNT DATE: January 6, 2015 TIME PERIOD: 4:45 p.m. - 5:45 p.m. PEAK HOUR FACTOR: 0.96 "EXISTING TRAFFIC" EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR E-711EXISTING CO1vDITI014S 1 420 1 5 1 0 1 1 1 3 2 1 30 1 135 1 0 1 3 1 12 143 'BACKGROUND TRAFFIC' TOTAL "YES EO" TNAFFIC ;;_ EBL 0 EBT 0 EBR 0 WBLWBT 0 0 WBR 0 NBL 0 NBT 1 0 NBR (1,1 SBL 0 SBT 0 SBR 0 NON -PROJECT TRAFFIC azz 5 0 1 a zn „� J IL l44 "PROJECT TRAFFIC" LAND USE TYPF Mal CCT rCo ..oma rvoi VVBR NBL N8T NBR SBL SBT SBR Project Paw . --13! B Tr1PIS Not NeA49 114 TOTAL PROJECTTRAFFIC 114 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 o 1 as TOTAL TRAFFIC 536 I 5 1 0 1 1 1 an J lL 1 193 EXISTING (2015) CONDITIONS TRAFFIC ANALYSIS SUMMARY HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.6 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Agency/Co.: KHA Date Performed: 1/6/2015 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: Wayzata Blvd & Quentin Ave Jurisdiction: City of Golden Valley Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2015 Existing Traffic Conds Project ID: West End AUAR Update East/West Street: Wayzata Blvd North/South Street: Quentin Ave Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 60 146 154 95 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 65 160 169 104 Percent Heavy Vehicles 1 Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 1 0 Configuration LT TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 269 192 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 295 210 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / No / Lanes 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Config LT LR v (vph) 65 505 C (m) (vph) 1296 594 v/c 0.05 0.85 95% queue length 0.16 9.28 Control Delay 7.9 36.1 LOS A E Approach Delay 36.1 Approach LOS E HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.6 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Agency/Co.: KHA Date Performed: 1/6/2015 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: Wayzata Blvd & France Ave W Jurisdiction: City of Golden Valley Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2015 Existing Traffic Conds Project ID: West End AUAR Update East/West Street: Wayzata Blvd North/South Street: France Ave West Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs)• 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 414 8 0 179 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 465 8 0 201 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- __ 1 Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 1 0 0 1 Configuration TR LT Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 95 2 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.89 0.89 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 106 2 Percent Heavy Vehicles 1 1 Percent Grade (o) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage No Lanes 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Config LT I LR v (vph) 0 108 C(m) (vph) 1094 426 v/c 0.00 0.25 95% queue length 0.00 0.99 Control Delay 8.3 16.3 LOS A C Approach Delay 16.3 Approach LOS C HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.6 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: KHA Agency/Co.: KHA Date Performed: 1/6/2015 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: Wayzata Blvd & France Ave E Jurisdiction: City of Golden Valley Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2015 Existing Traffic Conds Project ID: West End AUAR Update East/West Street: Wayzata Blvd North/South Street: France Ave E Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 30 135 0 3 12 143 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 31 140 0 3 12 148 Percent Heavy Vehicles 1 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Yes Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 1 Configuration LTR LT R Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 1 3 2 420 5 0 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1 3 2 437 5 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 1 1 1 1 1 1 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage No / No / Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Config LTR LT LTR LTR v (vph) 31 3 6 442 C(m) (vph) 1613 1456 726 718 v/c 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.62 95% queue length 0.06 0.01 0.02 4.27 Control Delay 7.3 7.5 10.0- 17.7 LOS A A A C Approach Delay 10.0- 17.7 Approach LOS A C BACKGROUND (2016) CONDITIONS TRAFFIC ANALYSIS SUMMARY HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.6 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: KHA 270 193 Agency/Co.: KHA PHF 0.91 0.91 Date Performed: 1/6/2015 HFR 296 212 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour 2 2 Percent Grade (o) Intersection: Wayzata Blvd & Quentin Ave 0 Flared Approach: Jurisdiction: City of Golden Valley / No / Lanes Units: U. S. Customary 0 0 Configuration Analysis Year: 2016 Background Traffic Conds LR Project ID: West End AUAR Update of Service Approach East/West Street: Wayzata Blvd Eastbound Movement North/South Street: Quentin Ave 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments 65 508 Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound 593 Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R L T R Control Delay 7.9 37.0 Volume 60 147 155 95 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 65 161 170 104 Percent Heavy Vehicles 1 -- -- -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 1 0 Configuration LT TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 270 193 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 296 212 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade (o) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / No / Lanes 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config LT LR v (vph) 65 508 C (m) (vph) 1295 593 v/c 0.05 0.86 95% queue length 0.16 9.48 Control Delay 7.9 37.0 LOS A E Approach Delay 37.0 Approach LOS E HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.6 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: KHA Agency/Co.: KHA Date Performed: 1/6/2015 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: Wayzata Blvd & France Ave W Jurisdiction: City of Golden Valley Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2016 Background Traffic Conds Project ID: West End AUAR Update East/West Street: Wayzata Blvd North/South Street: France Ave West Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R L T R 0.25 Volume 416 8 0 180 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 467 8 0 202 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 1 -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 1 0 0 1 Configuration TR LT Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 95 2 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.89 0.89 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 106 2 Percent Heavy Vehicles 1 1 Percent Grade (o) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage No Lanes 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Config LT LR v (vph) 0 108 C(m) (vph) 1092 424 v/c 0.00 0.25 95% queue length 0.00 1.00 Control Delay 8.3 16.4 LOS A C Approach Delay 16.4 Approach LOS C HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.6 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: KHA 1 3 Agency/Co.: KHA 422 5 Date Performed: 1/6/2015 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.96 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour 0.96 0.96 Intersection: Wayzata Blvd & France Ave E 0.96 Hourly Flow Rate, Jurisdiction: City of Golden Valley 3 2 Units: U. S. Customary 5 0 Analysis Year: 2016 Background Traffic Conds 1 1 Project ID: West End AUAR Update 1 1 East/West Street: Wayzata Blvd B 0 North/South Street: France Ave E 0 Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments No / Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound No / Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R 0 Configuration Volume 30 136 0 3 12 144 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 31 141 0 3 12 150 Percent Heavy Vehicles 1 -- -- 1 -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Yes Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 1 Configuration LTR LT R Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 1 3 2 422 5 0 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1 3 2 439 5 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 1 1 1 1 1 1 Percent Grade (%) B 0 Approach Delay 0 10.0+ Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage No / C No / Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR v (vph) Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Config LTR LT LTR LTR v (vph) 31 3 6 444 C(m) (vph) 1613 1448 724 716 v/c 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.62 95% queue length 0.06 0.01 0.03 4.34 Control Delay 7.3 7.5 10.0+ 17.9 LOS A A B C Approach Delay 10.0+ 17.9 Approach LOS B C FUTURE TOTAL (2016) CONDITIONS TRAFFIC ANALYSIS SUMMARY HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.6 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: KHA Agency/Co.: KHA Date Performed: 1/6/2015 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: Wayzata Blvd & Quentin Ave Jurisdiction: City of Golden Valley Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2016 Total Traffic Conds Project ID: West End AUAR Update East/West Street: Wayzata Blvd North/South Street: Quentin Ave Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 76 147 155 144 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 83 161 170 158 Percent Heavy Vehicles 1 -- -- -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 1 0 Configuration LT TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 384 231 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 421 253 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade (o) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / No / Lanes 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config LT LR v (vph) 83 674 C(m) (vph) 1237 534 v/c 0.07 1.26 95% queue length 0.22 26.90 Control Delay 8.1 156.2 LOS A F Approach Delay 156.2 Approach LOS F HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.6 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: KHA Agency/Co.: KHA Date Performed: 1/6/2015 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: Wayzata Blvd & Quentin Ave Jurisdiction: City of Golden Valley Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2016 Total Traffic Conds +Imp Project ID: West End AUAR Update East/West Street: Wayzata Blvd North/South Street: Quentin Ave Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R 0.25 Volume 76 147 155 144 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 83 161 170 158 Percent Heavy Vehicles 1 -- -- -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? No Lanes 0 1 1 1 Configuration LT T R Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 384 231 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 421 253 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config LT L R v (vph) 83 421 253 C(m) (vph) 1237 496 874 v/c 0.07 0.85 0.29 95% queue length 0.22 8.72 1.20 Control Delay 8.1 40.9 10.8 LOS A E B Approach Delay 29.6 Approach LOS D HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.6 Phone: Fax: E -Mail: ALL -WAY STOP CONTROL(AWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: KHA Agency/Co.: KHA Date Performed: 1/13/2015 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: Wayzata Blvd & Quentin Ave Jurisdiction: City of Golden Valley Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2016 Total Traffic Conds +Imp Project ID: West End AUAR Update East/West Street: Wayzata Blvd North/South Street: Quentin Ave Worksheet 2 - Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics 1 Eastbound I Westbound Northbound I Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R I I I I Volume 1384 0 231 10 0 0 176 I 147 0 10 155 144 % Thrus Left Lane Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 Ll L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Configuration L R LT TR PHF 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.91 Flow Rate 421 231 244 328 % Heavy Veh 2 0 1 1 No. Lanes 2 1 1 Opposing -Lanes 0 1 1 Conflicting -lanes 1 2 2 Geometry group 1 2 2 Duration, T 0.25 hrs. Worksheet 3 - Saturation Headway Adjustment Worksheet Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 Ll L2 L1 L2 Flow Rates: Total in Lane 421 231 244 328 Left -Turn 421 0 83 0 Right -Turn 0 231 0 158 Prop. Left -Turns 1.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 Prop. Right -Turns 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.5 Prop. Heavy Vehicle0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Geometry Group 1 2 2 Adjustments Exhibit 17-33: hLT-adj 0.2 0.2 0.2 hRT-adj -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 hHV-adj 1.7 1.7 1.7 hadj, computed 0.2 -0.6 0.1 Worksheet 4 - Departure Headway and Service Time Eastbound Westbound Northbound L1 L2 L1 L2 Ll L2 Flow rate 421 231 244 hd, initial value 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 x, initial 0.37 0.21 0.22 hd, final value 5.78 4.93 6.09 x, final value 0.68 0.32 0.41 Move -up time, m 2.0 2.0 Service Time 3.8 2.9 4.1 Worksheet 5 - Capacity and Level of Service Eastbound Westbound Northbound L1 L2 Ll L2 L1 L2 Flow Rate 421 231 244 Service Time 3.8 2.9 4.1 Utilization, x 0.68 0.32 0.41 Dep. headway, hd 5.78 4.93 6.09 Capacity 609 481 494 Delay 19.96 10.20 13.30 LOS C B B Approach: Delay 16.51 13.30 LOS C B Intersection Delay 15.28 Intersection LOS C -0.3 Southbound L1 L2 328 3.20 3.20 0.29 5.61 0.51 2.0 3.6 Southbound L1 L2 328 3.6 0.51 5.61 578 14.32 B 14.32 B HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.6 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: KHA Agency/Co.: KHA Date Performed: 1/6/2015 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: Wayzata Blvd & France Ave W Jurisdiction: City of Golden Valley Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2016 Total Traffic Conds Project ID: West End AUAR Update East/West Street: Wayzata Blvd North/South Street: France Ave West Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 530 8 0 229 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 595 8 0 257 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 1 -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 1 0 0 1 Configuration TR LT Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 95 0 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.89 0.89 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 106 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 1 1 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage No Lanes 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Config LT I LR v (vph) 0 106 C(m) (vph) 979 329 v/c 0.00 0.32 95% queue length 0.00 1.36 Control Delay 8.7 21.1 LOS A C Approach Delay 21.1 Approach LOS C HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.6 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: KHA Agency/Co.: KHA Date Performed: 1/6/2015 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: Wayzata Blvd & France Ave E Jurisdiction: City of Golden Valley Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2016 Total Traffic Conds Project ID: West End AUAR Update East/West Street: Wayzata Blvd North/South Street: France Ave E Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments 0.25 Major Street: Approach Northbound 3 2 Southbound 0 Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 Hourly Flow Rate, L T R L T R Percent Heavy Vehicles 1 1 1 1 1 1 Volume 30 136 0 3 12 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 31 141 0 3 12 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 1 -- -- 1 -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided Delay, / and Level of Service RT Channelized? Approach NB SB Westbound Yes Eastbound Lanes 1 0 1 0 7 8 0 1 1 11 12 Configuration LTR LTR LTR LT R LTR Upstream Signal? 31 No 6 No 563 C(m) (vph) 1613 1448 739 716 Minor Street: Approach 0.02 Westbound 0.01 Eastbound 0.79 Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 Control Delay L T R L T R Volume 1 3 2 536 5 0 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1 3 2 558 5 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 1 1 1 1 1 1 Percent Grade (o) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage No / No / Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Config LTR LT LTR LTR v (vph) 31 3 6 563 C(m) (vph) 1613 1448 739 716 v/c 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.79 95% queue length 0.06 0.01 0.02 7.83 Control Delay 7.3 7.5 9.9 25.9 LOS A A A D Approach Delay 9.9 25.9 Approach LOS A D TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS SUMMARY Table 1 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT SUMMARY City. City of Golden Valley County: Hennepin Engineer: Adam Gibson, P.E. Date: Monday, January 19, 2015 Major Street: Wayzata Boulevard/Quentin Avenue Lanes: 1 Critical Approach Speed: 35 Minor Street: Wayzata Boulevard Lanes: 1 Volume Level Criteria 1. Is the critical speed of major street traffic > 70 km/h (40 mph) ? ❑ Yes ■ No 2. Is the intersection in a built-up area of isolated community of <10,000 population? ❑ Yes ■ No If Question 1 or 2 above is answered "Yes", then use 70%" volume level ❑ 70% ■ 100% WARRANT 1 - EIGHT-HOUR VEHICULAR VOLUME Applicable: ■ Yes ❑ No Warrant 1 is satisfied if Condition A or Condition B is "100`0" satisfied. Satisfied: ❑ Yes ■ No Warrant is also satisfied if both Condition A and Condition B are "80%" satisfied. ¢ ¢ 0 0 ¢ ¢ 0 0 Condition A - Minimum Vehicular Volume 100% Satisfied: ❑ Yes ■ No 80% Satisfied: ❑ Yes ■ No (volumes in veh/hr) Minimum Requirements (80% Shown in Brackets) Eight Highest Hours a g g g g g Approach Lanes 1 2 or more ¢ ¢ o 0 ¢ ¢ 0 0 ¢ ¢ 0 0 0 a- 0 0 a. a. LO LO o- a LO a. o- a. a. Volume Level 100% 70% 100% 70% M M M M M M i'i O v v u, v v ,n u, v v uo ,r, v v Both Approaches 5(M 31 6: u) z_0 (O n 1 ., Ih 60 � 2 Co Oi 311 151 N M 2 0,9� M 4 4 �6 40 Lb 6 on Major Street (400" �� i (432)�u �2G u .6 �. �,; (405) 20 Highest Approach ?1tf ! C= E79 , 233 120 uE 142: 2+3 .345. .1 on Minor Street (120) oz : v ; t 12, 179 . 233 120 Li 142 243 34S ;. 208 Record 8 hiahest hours and the rnrresnnnH7-n ,,.,i,,_. :,, ti minimum volumes are met for eight hours. Condition is 80% satisfied if parenthetical volumes are met for eight hours. Condition B - Interruption of Continuous Traffic Condition B is intended for application where the traffic volume is so heavy that traffic on the minor street suffers excessive delay. Applicable: ■ Yes ❑ No Excessive Delay: ❑ Yes ■ No 100% Satisfied: ❑ Yes ■ No 80% Satisfied: ❑ Yes ■ No (volumes in veh/hr) Minimum Requirements (80% Shown in Brackets) Eight Highest Hours a. 2 g g g g g Approach Lanes 1 2 or more ¢¢¢¢¢¢ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 a a LO LO a. M Lo u, o- a. a a. Volume Level 100% 70% 1 100% 70%M M M M M M (:,i O v: v v v u, u, v v LO ,r, v Both Approaches 750 522: PDO ,. 61„ }, (D n ^r n M f._ a0 M a .-- 15,5 N CO M V V N 4u LO (a 777, on Major Street 800) 2; f 2 <" . - u u�.: 2_.; 2_,�, Highest Approach 75 5'% 70 179 ; "233, 120 100 142: `243- '. 208 ; on Minor Street (60)i:` .. 07911 1233 120 100 142 ;243 , .345 345 208 11 Record 8 h/ahest hours and minimum volumes are met for eight hours . Condition is 80% satisfied if parenthetical volumes are met for eight hours. Source: Revised from NCHRP Report 457 K:\NYC_CIVIL\160577004_West_EndqQuentin&Wayzata_SWA_24-hr.xlsx]Warrant 1 Table 2 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT SUMMARY City: City of Golden Valley Engineer: Adam Gibson, P.E. County: Hennepin Date: Monday, January 19, 2015 Major Street: Wayzata Boulevard/Quentin Avenue Lanes: 1 Critical Approach Speed: 35 Minor Street: Wayzata Boulevard Lanes: 1 Volume Level Criteria 1. Is the critical speed of major street traffic > 70 km/h (40 mph) ? ❑ Yes ■ No 2. Is the intersection in a built-up area of isolated community of <10,000 population? ❑ Yes ■ No If Question 1 or 2 above is answered "Yes", then use "70x/0" volume level ❑ 70% ■ 100% WARRANT 2 - FOUR-HOUR VEHICULAR VOLUME Applicable: ■ Yes ❑ No If all four points lie above the appropriate line, then the warrant is satisfied. Satisfied: ❑ Yes ■ No Four Volumes Highest Major Minor Hours Street Street 7:30 AM - 422 233 8:30 AM 8:30 AM - 317 120 9:30 AM 3:45 PM - 366 243 4:45 PM 4:45 PM - 405 345 5:45 PM Plot four volume combinations on the applicable figure below. FIGURE 4C-1: Criteria for "100%" Volume Level 700 x IL soo L, 500 u0 Lu H a 400 ya 1z Z f 300 J > 200 x 0 x 100 0 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 MAJOR STREET -TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES - VPH *115 80 *Note: 115 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor street approach with two or more lanes and 80 vph applies as the lower threshold volume threshold for a minor street approach with one lane. FIGURE 4C-2: Criteria for "70%" Volume Level (Community Less than 10,000 population or above 70 km/hr (40 mph) on Major Street) 400 x IL 9 F a 300 u� Lu0 Fa a 200 0 U z� 2r0 x 100 (7 2 0 L- 200 OR N ORE LANES 20R MORE ANES 2 OR MORE LANES & 1 LANE 1 LANEL.E 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 MAJOR STREET -TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES - VPH * Note: 80 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor street approach with two or more lanes and 60 vph applies as the lower threshold volume threshold for a minor street approach with one lane. "80 60 source: Kewsea Trom Nt mKt- Keport4b/ K:\NYC_CIVIL\160577004_West_EndlQuentin&Wayzata_SWA_24-hr.xlsx]Warrant 1 MULTI -WAY STOP WARRANT ANALYSIS SUMMARY Major > 300? NO YES YES NO NO YES YES NO NO Minor > 200? NO YES NO NO NO YES YES YES NO Multi -Way Stop Control Summary Highest 8 Hours Wa zata Boulevard & Quentin Avenue :30-710 t3 10 3 0 .8' E 79.3f 1 w " 1 10 1,1';4 »3 45 ,445= :4 x Major 208 422 317 155 209 366 405 220 288 Minor 179 233 120 100 142 243 345 208 196 Major > 300? NO YES YES NO NO YES YES NO NO Minor > 200? NO YES NO NO NO YES YES YES NO INTERSECTION SIGHT PHOTOS Sight Distance Wayzata Blvd and Quentin Ave Eastbound facing south 01-06-2015 Right View Sight Distance Wayzata Blvd and Quentin Ave Eastbound facing north 01-06-2015 Left View Sight Distance Wayzata Blvd and Natchez Ave Northbound facing east 01-07-2015 Right View Sight Distance Wayzata Blvd and Natchez Ave Northbound facing west 01-07-2015 Left View Sight Distance Wayzata Blvd and Fairlawn Way Northbound facing east 01-07-2015 Right View Sight Distance Wayzata Blvd and Fairlawn Way Northbound facing west 01-07-2015 Left View i- 0 IN i- 0 Sight Distance Wayzata Blvd and June Ave Northbound facing west 01-07-2015 Left View Sight Distance Wayzata Blvd and Tyrol Trail Northbound facing east 01-07-2015 Right View Sight Distance Wayzata Blvd and Tyrol Trail Northbound facing west 01-07-2015 Left View Sight Distance Wayzata Blvd and Tyrol Trail (Over Crosswalk) Northbound facing east 01-07-2015 Right View Sight Distance Wayzata Blvd and Tyrol Trail (Over Crosswalk) Northbound facing west 01-07-2015 Left View Sight Distance Wayzata Blvd and France Ave (Golden Valley) Northbound facing east 01-07-2015 Right View Sight Distance Wayzata Blvd and France Ave (Golden Valley) Northbound facing west 01-07-2015 Left View Sight Distance Wayzata Blvd and France Ave (Minneapolis) Northbound facing east 01-07-2015 Right View Sight Distance Wayzata Blvd and France Ave (Minneapolis) Northbound facing west 01-07-2015 Left View EXISTING HEALTH PARTNERS LILA pR1VE- 6y STAT ... E HIGHWAY 100 WEST END DEVELOPMENT St. Louis Park, MN / Golden Valley, MN K i m I ey \/' Horn February 2015 Property Line Yk � D L +t: LEGEND DECIDUOUS TREES ORNAMENTALTREES { EVERGREEN TREES SHRUB BEDS e..w Ilk 0 25' 50' CENTRAL PARK WEST KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That DLC Residential LLC, a Florida limited liability company, owner of the following described property: I Marcus F. Hampton do hereb p hereby certify that this plat was prepared by me or under my direct supervision; that I am a duly Licensed land Surveyor in the Outlot A, THE SHOPS AT WEST END. State of Minnesota; that this plat is a correct representation of the boundary survey; that all mathematical data and labels are correctly designated on this plat; that all monuments depicted on this plat have been, or will be correctly set within one year; that all water boundaries and wet lands, as defined in Registered Property Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.0 1, Subd. 3, as of the date of this certificate are shown and labeled on this plat; and all public ways are shown and labeled Certificate of Title No. 1222619 on this plat. Lots 2, 3, 4 and 6, Block 4, except that portion of said Lots taken for Belt Line Highway; Lots 7 to 12 inclusive, Block 4, and that part of Raleigh Avenue vacated lying between the Westerly extension of the South line of said Lot 7 and the North line of said Lot 12 and that part of the vacated alley in said Block 4lying between the Easterly extensions of the North and South lines of said Lot 7 and between the South line of said Lot 9 and the North line of said Lot it and that part of the West 1/2 of the vacated alley in said Block 4lying between the extensions of the North and South lines of said Lot 8 and between the North and South lines of said Lot 12; All in "Kavlis Cedardale". Thatpart of the following described property: That part of vacated Raleigh and Douglas Avenues as shown on the plat of "Kavlis Cedardale" lying between the extensions across said Avenues of the South and West lines of Lot 7, Block 4 and that part of said vacated Douglas Avenue adjoining Lots 6 and 7, Block 4 of said plat lying between the Westerly line of Belt Line Highway and the extension across said Avenue of the West line of said Lot 7, Block 4, "Kavlis Cedardale"; Which lies Northerly of a straight line extending between the Southwest corner of Tract E, Registered Land Survey No. 864, Hennepin County, Minnesota and the Westerly right-of-way of State Trunk Highway 100 passing through a point on the East line of said Tract E distant 18.18 feet North of the Southeast corner of said Tract E as measured along said East line. Registered Property Certificate of Title No. 1012678 Lot 1, Block 4, "Kavlis Cedardale" and that part of the vacated alley in said Block 4, lying East of the center line thereof and between the extensions across it of the North and South lines of said Lot 1. And That part of the North 693.61 feet of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 30, Township 29, Range 24 lying Westerly and Southerly of State Trunk Highway No. 100, also known as the Belt Line Highway. Registered Property Certificate of Title No. 1012734 That part of the South 60 feet of the North 753.61 feet of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 30, Township 29, Range 24, lying West of the Belt Line Highway, Registered Property Certificate of Title No. 1012680 That part of vacated Raleigh Avenue and of vacated Douglas Avenue, all according to the plat of "Kavlis Cedardale" lying Westerly of the Westerly right of way line of State Trunk Highway No. 100 as described in the Final Certificate recorded in Book 412 of Miscellaneous Records, page 148 in the office of the County Recorder and lying Southerly of aline drawn from the Southwest corner of Tract E, Registered Land Survey No. 864 and passing through a point on the East line of said Tract E distant 18.18 feet North of the Southeast corner of said Tract E. Registered Property Certificate of Title No. 1012686 That part of vacated Utica Avenue South, as dedicated on the plat of THE SHOPS AT W EST END, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying easterly of the following described line: Commencing at the northwest corner of Outlot A, said plat; thence on an assumed bearing of South, along the west line of said Outlot A, a distance of 95.16 feet to a corner of said Outlot A and the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence, continuing on a bearing of South, a distance of 81.53 feet to a corner of said Outlot A, and said line there terminating. Has caused the same to be surveyed and platted as CENTRAL PARK WEST and does hereby dedicate to the public for public use the public way and drainage and utility easements as created by this plat. In witness whereof said DLC Residential LLC, a Florida limited liability company, has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this day of 20 SIGNED: DLC RESIDENTIAL LLC By STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF This instrument was acknowledged before me this day of company. Notary Public, County, Minnesota My Commission Expires 20_ by of DLC Residential LLC, a Florida limited liability company, on behalf of the Notary Printed Name Dated this day of , 20 Marcus F. Hampton, Licensed Land Surveyor Minnesota License No. 47481 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20_, by Marcus F. Hampton, a Licensed Land Surveyor, Notary Public, County, Minnesota Notary Printed Name My Commission Expires CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SAINT LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA This plat of CENTRAL PARK WEST was approved and accepted by the City Council of the City of Saint Louis Park, Minnesota, at a regular meeting thereof held this _ day of 20_and said plat is in compliance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, Subd. 2. City Council, City of Saint Louis Park, Minnesota By: Mayor By _ Clerk RESIDENT AND REAL ESTATE SERVICES, Hennepin County, Minnesota I hereby certify that taxes payable in 20_ and prior years have been paid for land described on this plat, dated this day of 20 Mark V. Chapin, County Auditor By Deputy SURVEY DIVISION, Hennepin County, Minnesota Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 383B.565 (1969), this plat has been approved this day of , 20 Chris F. Mavis, County Surveyor By REGISTRAR OF TITLES, Hennepin County, Minnesota I hereby certify that the within plat of CENTRAL PARK WEST was filed in this office this day of 20J at o'clock .M. Martin McCormick, Registrar of Titles By Deputy I G 4 2015 L SAMBATEK, INC. ENGINEERING, PLANNING AND LAND SURVEYING CENTRAL PARK WEST O DENOTES 112 INCH BY 14 INCH IRON MONUMENT SET AND MARKED BY LICENSE NO. 47481. • DENOTES 1/2 INCH IRON MONUMENT FOUND UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN. 0 DENOTES SECTION CORNER MONUMENT THE SOUTH LINE T OUTLET A, THE BEARING SHOPS AT SOUTH ST 89 8?.yl ` a= END, ISS ASSUMED MINUTES 44 ECONDSW OF SOUTH 89 _LINE D PER ab' L,'2408 ----L= 1p^'2023+ DEGREE539 MINUTE544 SECONDS WEST. - OOC N0 2107510 A ,' ,168'84 R=9 Rsg549J 8=36'20'JI' app°p/ i _ �L.6057J R=904.93-b"�N86'52'04"W L 4636 °P641\/N191Y50 W19.34�> L>IBJJS q_ - IN I I I in .9- i I I j I x 3� I II -20'0f0 5. �x - 1,70:70 R.T.. DOC. NO. 33§�e NORTH �ti ? 0 50 100 1 SCALE IN FEET <_ / �itLy 5L>115F_D _y-��_49.'' i lO��g♦t�'-T1�t-'_ NEA/E�T E�Bf}�-�-�G �\_�-,'=\o- LLI --I/ �`•��-- -��\-N_7N1qy_r•1- 2E>u-2s-?733._As �U.N --r-�_VNCb,aDO_N5W41'48W. _PE M- Pu6S Y1J4 -,}.�4DDrZ0213X1 NORTH 62 M8 _- -I III iD LS47481 _ _� '�B'49432'26556,0 - _ >49� 7- ` _�- O� NOEA' 'NFNT _- /� ----------�." o , �2,k'73E `I 1/YA--�'9---_��� ---p y { ,> --I`-?^ \�mN OW �� 2 b c'r, A=5°33'03' 17+04 c` ---� I I ��1` �oq�Fh�uy��_� Sj • �` SW,JOW E 1101 N NO Zo EAggyy''__\ L=32.17 a ORA/NACE G Q I 9I760'"7M1'T�IO `p / • Y. �+ �" u > 57!'}1'19 E U7JL/!Y 2J. 16 1 ..1 ,� �•� �' / a IG I¢Iry���a 1Bz5 , EAstalavT I I NORTH i I 2'�F✓9s Oct lg .vr-:12. I,. �� 10 ! i ! ! 3•?6• 7rs 7.��O6 163 SE ih -; L`sos47F ,95 D O i I i I 6321 �-FouNAI k&Lg����;�_i7'F � _ I � 1 � �r" $ ,.�( I I I ., -. ( 2 N71'42£lEl,' _-5i�=<y��,1 /1-+C� .`-122200 01Y 1� �2'�j ml la y1r�l`J� 1.26 �NT31Yfs���1//L_�OT09.93/�'T / I a�� I I I �Ia� �I I -r-i. p D Lq�ry JN zN h/ L m I =q 3 c I I ', ` I I 0 1°",01zau I I L-rzc3�- �' • / I IO I y y I SW70'16E 'r _ " - v 1 - ,vo-s87 h 4 -- - - u1 1-'9 pp / WI 0/ �• /v Q / NORTH 323.28 I h/b'r 21.451 _' I N 1 g I I i1 R I I -al I e^^t1°o1F 6.9 I e 10 Ih m �1 IA 2 W 1 1 I I� i W � 1 I ^ R-24.33 I I �.L-38.72 awNAZ s UIwrY - - - I c$ • I i A 91'12'12" .-EASEvENT .N 100"WI zW>eT,--J&71 9516-' 81.5J LS 4 .. 24.85• � \i �'_ � .J' L - - FD Is 7481 r I� azls I x� m - UTICA AVENUE S NORTH 479.71 - - - - - - - - _ - - - 36: 18 I .0 �. 33.78 A t; NORTH ,522I0-' i n j- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - >rb I6W%. AFD MAG AIL, �cNM 8 -T E G I I EAST LINE Of LIRA T, _ SW770002 LS 8846_ -,816 1 c I I N90b0217 [69 a ` h ' ` �`? SOO'20'16 E vi ✓7I tlel I 19.92E-' 49.00 1 E > t I I U7K/TY EASCWEN7__ - - 1c WA/FR NAIN EASEVENr N I I OUTLOT A PER as Iro szoJu6 - ; _ - Iry - I PER 00C N0. 6J87W i � 3 I I NW7Y5YE�' _ 41 y $ I I I � W I Sw CGRNER, B zlm 51.82 JO 1 I r. 1 I I in .9- Ih 13 II 3� I II �� II - - - - - - - - _ - - - 36: 18 I .0 �. 33.78 A t; NORTH ,522I0-' i n j- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - >rb I6W%. AFD MAG AIL, �cNM 8 -T E G I I EAST LINE Of LIRA T, _ SW770002 LS 8846_ -,816 1 c I I N90b0217 [69 a ` h ' ` �`? SOO'20'16 E vi ✓7I tlel I 19.92E-' 49.00 1 E > t I I U7K/TY EASCWEN7__ - - 1c WA/FR NAIN EASEVENr N I I OUTLOT A PER as Iro szoJu6 - ; _ - Iry - I PER 00C N0. 6J87W i � 3 I I NW7Y5YE�' _ 41 y $ I I I � W I Sw CGRNER, B zlm 51.82 JO 167.98'' NOO-40.56"E i ITICA A E i`°=I.1P .. ^ n ul h -I •I MAG NAIL IdBJy .i,' °•-054 NORIFF 93.80--� R=361.33 ,,•• L=45.19 0 &7`09'55' I 7.14 N07.09 '87 N52"'55'Wi'N46'20'OYE, 10.04 9.98 a 43&67 > `10'10" 36.5 I I N13 � �IT I w is c z SAMBATEK, INC. ENGINEERING, PLANNING ANTI IANTI CIIRVFVIAI!_ SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS I10I- ,� 1� - SW20'10IW 81.20-'11 N 1I I�'w I F- a NW'W L17T I � 8 I 783 Q I`� I V I I,ar cn I ' al �I I Ig iW �I I is ml NWaomr , I SW'W2l 1E %'500 � __ I a /b �- MAG NAIL-- _ i �p -- -- 45 0 LS 71.52 -�, 21 -j ---- N89990J"W _---'- - . �! 47487 o -f o ��� -63.68'" is 92 i lo.00 ------- -- 141.03-- o - ,49 DA ---,,. ;'",ass o� o ---------------- _------ - Lzg3 03.5o'2o"w, n '- In 167.98'' NOO-40.56"E i ITICA A E i`°=I.1P .. ^ n ul h -I •I MAG NAIL IdBJy .i,' °•-054 NORIFF 93.80--� R=361.33 ,,•• L=45.19 0 &7`09'55' I 7.14 N07.09 '87 N52"'55'Wi'N46'20'OYE, 10.04 9.98 a 43&67 > `10'10" 36.5 I I N13 � �IT I w is c z SAMBATEK, INC. ENGINEERING, PLANNING ANTI IANTI CIIRVFVIAI!_ SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS —SURVEY NOTES 1. meberlrg sr#emkbnea on m¢pwtaTNE SNops aiwFsi Fxo wh.n uwmea bexmg ofs¢nn g9d�39mk.n¢suseconm wenrorha southpnealaWaA. 2. Itte Wnka drtum is based on rawvpgg. Tte orlglnmlrg WmN mwb arc MN00i E189av ant Mxo0i2]tl9q; bvh relvmced fiom IM1e Mn00T GeMetk Doteb d, NreBENCHMA-agl nyro, northwest menet Ofsurseyed lNopnly,. dwwm Txx Fk,.�ea.3s BFNCHMMgtlZ Fl. hWromrt mghes comma slnvekeo q—M. TNH Flew=88)50 3. sabk¢gapeeryt,dae.n NMpmpeavlaerrinlmtbn Nrtaars.rc: SOBS WoleAta ENE 300212131 3 1511 Ildo Ate 5300212L320M4 IoM 51@IMyHO IMS 3 0 0212 4 31-00 02 15MS.k Navy NO MS 3002124.31-0035 SUBJECT PROPERTY Deeriabn from DOW mmMbsoenc Parcell Du[b1 A, The SM1ogM West EM, Hmnepb County, Mb«rsou. 0.eglxvlM pro,ol Certs cote Of took Nn 1222619 Foretell 2; Inn 2, 3, 4 ant 6, Bbd 4 exeq hat wetian avid lots taken for eek line HgMaay; U Md 11- Of sold wem12 and that Parc It--rted alk, i.a dBlwk 4v"hot BottwemT Egstee the M¢pans..I nE zee No to and S- u,8& vin owl)) acrd Betwee. the or South We of said Wt 9 and Ino Nora, II«of vd w111 and hat pen of he Wn1 1/2 of the vaoled alley In sale Bbck 4 NYIg between the eperWans Of he NOM and Spuh Imesavid Lot 8 aM between the NorthaM south lines It Wtan 12; AB II'_1 CMamale•. met wrc of he mlbw4lg ae:<ated property: Dox wrt a yvotM paell ana Ow11az even¢. as shown on the plat aY.YM cedardak• Mre.¢Metes doe mm-slom xross sad Avenue ahe SOMh ant Wert Imes a let],Bbck 4and hot part OF said waled Douglas gv¢rwe adjaning tasty 61.d 7, Bbck 4 Of vd pool lying between the W ly line a Bek Une Nlghw vntl the exge.slI. a -as old Ase... It the Suevey864 He—Ole Canty—net.. and the __N 10t -Off— aSDOI tht. NIgM1lwaYg IM—no,—,hapanto the Dot''. avid —E o-od 18.3a to. Horth a the 50prhe tO mrnerd vid T., E et meazured oWM vM E.t line. Beglstered Progm lenifia to a de No. 1012678 Paeel3: lot L BIOck4, "FaN ; OW.Male" and hen wrt ahe..ted allay i. sant 81od4, lying -11h. I.—,line in--- between the Memiom acmes it a [M North and Saah NPc asa'M m 1. And Tho part of dee North 693.61 feel OfIM1e Nortncat Quamr It SouhweC Owner Of So¢ 30,rowo-P 29, ealge 3a Iyln, WMem and Swlheh, of SWe Tru W Hlghwry no, 1M, all knawm as tlse Bek Une HI1hwW. Reglmtell Plow#y CertM adv No. 1012]34 Ana 4: Thx Pett ahe South M km ahe North )53.61len ahe Northeas Wartmahe SomM1wnt Wamra Seabn 30, TmAnsnlO 29, lunge 20, lylnp We#a he Bek Une Hoot— Xeglsteretl P_ fcniboto of Title A. IOI2680 parva s: mat wrt It wotM Paleigh Arenua and a varatM 175111. gwnuG ale aagang m he pool a •gevb Cadardak' Mre WeswN a[M1e WMem n8maway 8ne a State Tmnk Xlgkny Ho. IM az tlescHBed In he Final QHlBote recertlM m Book 611 aMbcellarwouz P.emNs, page toe m he alike a tM loamy EOEI RemNerand Nmg SownerMaa line drawn Irv. tM Swllmmrtmmm arrea L Rgletered 4M survey NO-Bfi4 antl peels, throvgM1 a polntan the En[ neva a vltl Tod f OIpaN 18.IBfee[ Xorth ache Southeast comer evil Tact E. m«", CenMgte o1 de 1m, 171x686 Isefwend% de, Commmwm Na. NCSi86392fklz, axed OB/27A2D14, hot Fir#Arneson Tolle mwnnw Cor.ww Has prodded us, the mlmwiee mmmmn etr. tnrtthe prow. is,vola! m in-.d.k 8, genian 2 hereof wieg the oma numbering rymm as in vid Saabs 1. favptm. kerns NO, 1;031,13, 36, 39<Oero mt5urveyrel,tM kerns. l0. The kgowieg appears as a redvl m the Certifuak aTtk fro tte IoM descnbM in Par—I1: 5ubje¢m•wrgcuvl earemem In hwra Great NOMern Pallway Company,Inw¢essors ant a,#g. L«he mnuruNon,rromte... antl apero[bn asrallwryand,Deet. apo.,wet ane across dAtte Auld dilt.geraelle SOY[hwen W,rtmase¢bn 3p, TownsMp 29, RNge 29 as dazoitedin Order Dec Na 908193;(«wasmpart a thitlm Aand ad It. dedkekd UtiogWwe Swnhj Eatementtlxt nm vRM he auroeveE prapvlYeM h nmshown m eke survey. 12. Thefollowi.g avPearsaza regulon he lirrh aTclefwtte uM descnbM in Parcell: SubjMm a revrvatlon by he Stale a Mlrmewu a mllHrab antl Mneol HMrty (. m lob I ant /i) UMerMng b. arcsh0sm on rte wrvry. 14 Towlnp wpears.arernat on IM1e CeMlk aTi[k fwtN UM descdbM In varcel5: ,¢.Jett teagrpttwle.ement In favor OfGrea[NOMern gWway DO -o y,11su¢nmH ant xCgm m fore cortmxVon, maintenance and opentlon as _I_N toils ertrxks upon ant earns that wrt atNo pfumbaz described as follows: A p"ral of lent b sad swtkw4l DID— of the Se,ANw Owner,III:-301Nne Eo.edy ofogee drown oerelkl with and 1(— 9 feet WMedy azwad at elgm wgksant mdalN Ecom!he¢.te,4-asp¢track No. l IhareinaftertlescrkedJ and W ,iy ask«dawn pxalel with ant tlrsum 9leve Deterlym .,ode[eWhtangle and ho—ty from he center I. rowlock Ho.2 (teMnaker de I—) 4M edeMln, ft. sad Ime downrt rgm arwln through pant'A" NertheHy m a IInO paregN won ana dlsun[ 2M rem SOuh measured x d$rt algin from Ila¢ sant NOM IMe ahe SwttM1w.t Quarwr of he SomNwes[ t]wner, Section 30, soot-nkrline azpw back No. l Is devrbM as follows: Beeinnin8 az santrcfverNe point"a';herr¢ Nontedv -.said line maltinga Sauk , included angle a92 degrees, 46 min with vid Horth Ilse d the 5mthw Wa athe , _,, Wamr. Sa 3D for 76 feet; hence amng o L) d ee M minusesmrae so he left b Ti.S feet; herr¢ a ng ataryem ISO .7"et hen-Cmga17Be— M comma euew t0 he hill ar 25 Feet a M[tere termin.B D sem om¢ line I ofet, d... tet d000O darfdlows:BginnirNxant Mmence wins•A";Iters--ho No— said Et. moor,aSm[nwemrN includeanle d g 92 ON—K Mnm.whhold North 1.11. -t—.Waiters SO --,t Sast Qa,.S,,BOI 30 f- ,, hen T6 Netce -g o 17 ¢Mont ig,ct.e DO he ooh for)5.5 fen; therrce,mryla lwgete I-3 feet It— I.Aoa9d-3lm mute tune to It. rgM for 125 f- _9 . DO Eeament dea¢fgmn 1r Irmnget., dr ewm.mtp rwtpnown m ora,ure.y. Is. Easement mrbunk hlehwaY 9 s, Intivdln8 any Incldenul rgM1U, In favor of tte Sum aMMnesga x mmalnM In Inc Flna COmFlrxe dated gpr1130 re<oNM lucre 15,. Wcument 595610. EaemeMswM "'Oe'"'Oe' tree do rte vHect IM1-- purveyed pmpwty vntl vin Net pM1own m he purvey. 16. Temrs, mMiliom and easement far public water main purposes, in faro, of the <iry ase wuis Park, as wrrvierM b tlse Wit Ckim Dead WtM Sepmmher 8, 19M, recalled Seplem6e, 28, 19M az Wcumem NO.63g3M. Euementla Cron on tlw zrwey. 1]. Favmen. b sewer, mnstructlon antl #reef patens. az mnW sed In he Canlrkm a Completbn Ot COMemnxlm E__,_ doled Nwrember 30, ]959, recortlad Mryd, 196d es Dacvmem No. )65858. w alneMed bYIW Wg U." Dent dated —126, ­, ¢.Ned December 19, 1974 as 1— No. 1128341, eddh rckares a porton of the sewer Fasem bNM erne¢¢¢ aresare tM1own m the wrvey. 18. Terms, mMitio21,nd easement rot mmmurawtion rymm proposes, b yavw a Nanhwesurn ger ielepM1me CwrpanY. as rnrrvinr!tl b tW 4xmms dated Oaoter.,196), --d November 11, 196) az Dmment No. 892x811. 6.wrre .m IteWwn on he,plrey. 19. Terms, mntlitbm and vument r« mmmunaotlan Wmm purposes. M favor a Nanlra.km Bee iaephww Company, a, mmalnM m the Wsement dated 0.tober 25, 296), rcmNetl November 11,196] as Oomment No, o­ UameM N iM1own en he survey. x Ime eavmem formmmumcatlwmto-Purp—Inkwra NOMwe#«n—TekOt—,,, (onrpwry. as m.tWetl more F.emem 0a[eE Otto bet 25,1967, -Id November 1, 1967 Oamment No. 89x382. Eas.m,m It'_ On In. aurv.y. —SUBJECT PROPERTY (CONT.) 21. Terms, cardifwns ana eassmemfm g. maim ant wpetllses b hwr a Mbrreapaw vas Compaw, u ronuinM in IM1e Earemem mea hruary15,1968. ,dod May14, I.8azD—elf t, 908433. exe—is hewn on ft N,v,,. 22 o- et memoNlon the 4rtifloUs orTxle M IM lent I.Ohbad m pmroN 1. 2 ant A. try ed 2,1975, 6, 1915¢ OowneM No. 1119521. NOTE: Document No.1129521 M1as —eaDAM by to Ns own teems, getrkskm no lorprM the w.vayad lrrapertY. 23. ThefOgawerg appear as memadahmane Certlflcmn .(TMe MtloelmpdescabMmPameh2aM 9: la) W wlMry.—ddoted august ]], 19>e, -ed September 7, 19]g.0«urewa Na.129x11), which reserves easemenn and Orem, IbJ fkamtlon MTerMnaelon a Easement daaed oao6er L 1986, rcmNetl Oaoha 2,1986 M D -amen[ No. l>M859; ant Icl Declavtion aTe,mmation a Restriction dated October 1,1986, remNed OImWr L 1986 as OwameM Na.1]60Bfi0. Favmmt,M ou retrktbns a loger area tloe wreeyed property, ¢cement to Not Own en tlw,wry. 2 and mntlitorna Rewlutim No. -61 hydro Ma SL Lou',Pah. grarnkgaswcial perms a,w Oot elle inn#nntimdan elf ot hullangantl pante, racNlry, tivtM W N u, 1985, remrtlM 1uN31, 1985 as Wmmem eta_ 1651105. 0«umem don n«,Reetloe wreyed goOertY. Te mss alaewl¢len No. 86¢6 bYtte ClryaSt. to WS Pxk, eran[Ing•OaMBbrul use PersiltallowhytM runsbuRlona anaFlc<buHolt, e and pante, kalm. da[M g0d121, 1986, recorded aqg 29, L986 n Oownwnt Xo. 1]39881. D«um.m dox n« vfl«ttlN wrrvy,G geperty. 26. Earemmtro'telemmmunlatbm pumps.,In cavo¢aNwlhwe#em Bell TekpWne Canpmy, as Ledo— In the E,vinem doted October 11, 1985, recorded May s, 1986 az Dwumem No. 1121614. --too do nm axae the surveyM pmpem>M •ro intslroan an rte survey. 27. The fIl Oo appear. memodab onthe Certificate a isle farm¢ tend tlexnbed in parcel It lef E-ement ant—th. dxetl Daober L 1986. re ' OUober;1986. D«ummt No. IMM]Fa; ant (b) Terminaxon Of Ea 11t l«Roadway am!Home Agrcemmt aatedwne 20, 1997, exordoof 24, 199). D-1 8 10x5_ Favmen[Iw bnecafhMtlw wrresM propem wq h not Crown an dw so.vey. 2B. It -..d mIol I Olrrg ¢,¢mems, as mmalnM In tte mII.I.g: l'J.DOII II Easement Oedarrtmn and mem ABreedated --1, 1986, remmetl Ocipber 2,1986 as Dxumem No. 1-117t; and 1b1 Amendment a PwclpmO,l Easement Dedar.lm ant Pgreemern daeea Dare 20, 199>, rxwdee wrt¢ 24,1997 as 0 -amen! Xo. r 1m2.. ell ro•dwwyaM utllMn ¢,¢metro do not exec[ he wrveyetl gopwty. Eleenol grw aazemmlleplwwn vn tlw wrvey. 29. The feN ng apq .s memonah- he Certlfotn It TMe for lte land de"Bml In pameh L 3, 4 and 5: la) NMce a Its Pend¢m dated -.1, 24.1989 e—May 10,1989 as Oavmea No. 2011585. fbJ PM1.1 Obc N of N.I.a us le -O' I— Thre Panel Obdvrge a Nmi-a Uz Pendens 1bl above b mta memonx w he fertlgwte of Thlewr tte land dsn ebed b Panel D«eme,m m n« alma the wrreyea property. 50. Terms and mndl[lom Of Resolutbn No, 92-197 W tNe Cm It 5t. LnWs Pah, eeardlng • candMO.I we «Ertl! ollowNg dry orc" dated December 2L 1992, umNed January 7, 1993 az 0«umem No. 233)823. 0«•mem,xeas Pant L Crown o.-ov vy. 31. Theota-tts of he State of Mlm-au, Including NO,hent¢IAO, .,��et[rl,ms and aces I-DoDens, as 01 u In he Partial FM1uI Cert✓ ¢dated 14—bm3, 1992, rermde J' 21, 1993. Document No. 2401517. ResbktrC v¢maM rebinlrg wag eacement ore drawn on he whey. Nlpwmy emmessnare emked Nad.o Iger Attl a doe wrveyN propel they aro notaM1ows. on IM1eaurvey. 32. Ter mndttbnsaMeasememfor warcrmam puroores,mlawrahe Ory olGaden Valley, as mrmlrwtl In he WttQalm Geed tlaretl -oft 3,1994, remmed Marcs IS, 1994 as Dxumem Xo- N91260. ta.om.nt to ohms an tM ,covey. 33. Terms ana mnatbm, m d1t,g eevmeras, aswn[NnedmhefalbNrg: (a) Owratbn and Easemrnt Agmemem damd wale 20. 1997, rcmMM lune 24,1997. Document x1)821030; ant (I)FNzt4 ZIM mA.--. Opentbn ana E.emem —dSemember 3A2—. r««ded DecemberNo. 28, 2004 vs Omumem g A- ;cl L3first Addendum to Operation IM Easement AE.,' dated Oecemher 92011. lomrded December 28, 2011 as Wwmem NO. 9721. A¢ev ercmem over oo—Ortle,. well to peMI, area ant a¢ev,roa n trot d,,I by dn¢Iglan In he d«nmems; I_ appmpmate¢Mens aro Mown an he survey. ream-. aver Ulka A--rw to— axaa aM1ew ,ped property. I— ana wntll[brssaho Oeclaro[lon deed Oc—'M,1.7, femrded—ben 31,2M7as Wcumen[no. I41I082. D«¢mems otfec. alt athe wrvrywd propwty. 35. The"'Be"tg a ohoppnrs as a nrmswkl pn he Ceetlllote of TNe fro [rte uM tlesMbM In pmcel I: Resoh No. 0901, by [he CM ase wase Park, going appmwl as gekminarypke dmtl Meech 3, 20M, remNed MamM1 18, 2M9 x DOcumem NO. 1722891. D«am.m epprow preaimkrMn qrt a TawE119 aT wen Eno wxwrw 1 atM wewy.e prowrty. 37. i rine antl mntlltlom, mcW8lne Basemen., as mlruMetl b he gecl«out Faumme antl Malmm�ance Agreement rot he Went End Publk ImDroaemm., between the Clry a Se Loins Park Duke ReohY UmXed Pamwrshlp. antl AD we. End, LLC, dated 1* 12, 2010, remMld august 30, x010 as DO --No_ 4783818. Fasemem aRees,11 aper -I l ahe.1—ped propem,,s 0sown an dee wrvey. Ter em A,...et between Dake 8eolry LIm vaMershipant AD WOO End.I.DC, deteed Sep .W1.'2010,1wmed 5agembee 24,2010 as D«samem Ne. <)9w99. Irbam, kgrao ant ma 1 1- Favment cover otl of a iatlw wrt dprow.,x Crown on IN, wrvay.OtMr¢,anon, 00 m.x«t the wr.¢md pro«m_ al. Commuancesa proc—M pend.,".De Courts tet -Po, loamy, Minnemu, under Case Na. 2-283, in tte-0., Metropalun CO..', a FwbNc mepow[lon and p-leol wbdlvlsbn Of tte Sten of Mlmsysvu v. Duke eexry Umlted ParowrsMp, an m na MMed Ponnershlp,eel, az dhclmed br NMre a Us pendens axed wN 1. 2014, recorded Ao' 8, W14,s l9¢Vmem No. 1.291x. TE. The obleIt ant propose of ale xtlan Is mamWrecertel.«.pent v u, ,,_posey Foremen. ant umwrar, eavnm. ere shpwn on the werey. _''TABLE AN NOTES 3. th subfe¢pm«mIlesw FI«d Wln LoneL per FEMA, FIRM Maq No. 27053W351F, 2 103352E, 2I053C0353E, 3]053m354E doth Woo= 4. The gross area athe -J.. Pmwm b 13.493_ 0,587,]55 Square Feel. W. To. mnkg ktr«mNm has tom Iron prwded It, ore lmumr, ]a. There are pro bullhes m IN, wr ryM prom. _ TM pe Meg areas ant strlping on the sWIM gopem ere zM1wm. iFwre ere a WMkap pvMrg sblN, antl h ,alb C« a ental 01469 oardrw sells. A OMbeereed nldence D. broktlfwus by GapM1er State One-falE iklztxo_la211521g3 mOl42os319],mMO]/2a/2014. Gopher stet, oro GN IGSOC) rmue,t was placed w O)/14/2014 for WBry lazes m sNN slu. The uMererouM WIm Iw[bm, shown termry zero, am Weed upm looms Nom rause mxky providers [hal a¢aalN mr3wmM a bole as a rewk phis m9uM.Ild'ay ppl rsokm tlo nm rewontl int re0u.nb 1b, pmWtle ahot.—nmapa plans,aM dnwlegsmlkuaphyxlcx.talon. The evayOt m,kes np gaxanhn tort he undergmuntl WIMes sM1own cwnprrse all iWr erhMn m he vee, NGwrin sent¢ w eWMo-d. Ulllm 0—oft- tlon shove hereon,dew,Nal—IBtbn111-1Infomatlon and tMse Mslbk mMtln het were bored -oh, 1rte surseraykd6eld work. The swwyorlu'-tices rte nemntdut [rte uMergmund ¢!finks sM1own here., If anY. are in [te eaa «atm. as le pINOIOIYlIteDted the e unBe,D,OAdu[II[kx Purwant m Ms2 0mlHua G�repher Suumgae Col rt I661-aea4-aM2) I_ to mY_,e.. 11 Tse eumeta.yan g Hers paned lanae are snpw.whe sarwy. C NORTH 0 220 240 SCALE IN FEET CERTIFICATION io puke Avory -11-1., DIL resldembl LLC anafirst Arhd TMe Insurance D.__ ds Is b-rLIN alwa the, met« plat and he to m which It Is hold were made In e—rd a eCh the 2011 Mlnlmum SUld,el Oelag Bmulre— .,ALTA/— Led T. Surveys, J-, and adolrted Iry ALTA pod HSPS, antl Includes Iwo L 2, 3, 4, 5, I(.), I(.), 8, 9, 111.1, IbJ and 13 —WO A tnwmf. The fled wohr. mmpkted m M/05/2014. .sed IMe Shh day It Septembm, 2014. Sambakk, Inc M F, hnHsMeet. l5 ob Lbmu No.4]a11 This-hIftel mss notes unkswM timed in blue boo. 11 V E R� r. FEB 0 2015 � TSambatek www....batek.com 12800 WMIzoow Dr.Sults 300 Ms MIMEImMN 55343 763,476.6030IslW- 783.476.8532 f=kE9e EV—M I Stlrv/kM IPWMIq Ifm_. Client DUKE REALTY CORPORATION 1600 UTICA AVENUE SOUTH SUITE 250 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 Project WEST END - UNDEVELOPED Location ST. LOUIS PARK, MN Certification Summary Ixtigr,ed. aro.. 0 .veil. encs Book/Page. sps7/O Phase, midalissncap9npnpla Revision History No.D3tc By Submittal/Resides Sheet Title ALTA/ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEY Sheet No. Revision 1/3 'roject No. DUK18420.01 �r I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I ' I 1 ' I I I I I ' I I i I I I I I I ' I I I I I I 1 I I ;I Il I I 1 II I I I II i I I III I� I I I I I I l wi LEGEND • FOUND MONEM UM.�I--{a—NINN ----- EhSEMENIUNE MONUMENT O-E�SANITNIY SEW EP - -- -- - SEIBpG[ON, MARRED L5I7I81 app—® STORM SEW ER 0.FSTRIQED ACCESS I EIEC KMETER _13END 5ELTON (ANCREIE NRB #LIGHT REI— TMNSFONMER ��" BUIDING LINE 91 N0. CONDRIONER loH� TELERHONE PEDESTN. --------- -u-NO GiiDPY GUY ANCHOII � w_O GASMETER ImUMOUS5URI-E CL HANDIUPTTNL —w— ONEAMFAO VnAF CONCAETE SURFACE 0 UTIOTY POLE —e— CHNN LRR iEN[E IANDSGPE TU0.FpfE �POSr r— IRON FEXEF SIGN —.— WIAE FENCE —a— NVOUEFHCE 101U—TREE CONITERWSIREE VICINITY MAP t NORTH o aD w SCALE IN FEET � F�0.mbatek .sambatek.camm 12800 Whlienter Oche, Sidle 300 Mlmetonke, MN 55343 763.476.6010 telephone 763.476.8532 fwghb EnpIrNNYIB I S Dmft I Remk9 l i1N1RMI w Client DUKE REALTY CORPORATION 1600 UTICA AVENUE SOUTH SUITE 250 ST. LOUIS PARK, 155416 Project WEST END - UNDEVELOPED Location ST. LOUIS PARK, MN Certification Summary Des®ned: 02vm:a APPraved: MFN Back/ Page:smk/u Phase: IDltlallssued: m/.PAav Revision History No.Date By Submittal/Revision Sheet Title ALTA/ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEY Sheet No. Revision 2/3 Project No. DUK18420.01 SEE SHEET 2 I AI, / 1 � 1 I I a ao I I 4-1 #--A I �I PARCEL4a I -I I I i� �i _aura Nlmn• �j I i t —I l 3 1 i �I_ �T- PARCEl;3t Z I Jl yl r w u uN1aI 1 � FI 1 I I / / 1 I o.l i,�r ry ca DDc Ro B5^zRt. , y,<�F_ . U �l ,t iii a l I n / I r �,i, J)i 1/1 �� a I'' I cW / r 1 .4 / 9 u f PARCEL i I/ 1 � r I 1 1 I I� J 1 r of L� I I �I — I I I - �I 1 4 3 /�o // ! gj C) I I r I� I I I � t g i D .F I.L,Y LTI i =� ., �• I � I � �'' I -' ii r ',; �;/ I a �' ti sl I } s I 3I o na� �f /�/ //� "kI 4 I E 1sgDo / L� k g In a N52 �-� � / I PARCEL 2 , (:_ 1� � I aoe °rE 11I -,v l I errorxv� , 11 I n-FV lres / 1, f I I . � � i l /f °°7E I 1 Qfo-i-` II � a J xiao / i 1l1��144. I I GOC r0. LB 6 7= a +as z �. �T/— sD ee NnL sMev ea. �u z +cr oa. ,va r z 1'r-- j ° -s t� a amur A 589'39 MSM' 263.49 Tr a ae d y �1 fFE NGB OW `""'BLE o $ , C StWB 4 5 NWOCE ===VICINITY MAP NORTH o 40 so St L IN —LEGEND • —i MONUMEM ----- ASEMENTUNF OMONUMENT ---0SANITART SFWFR RREO ISRT4B3 �N—® SEWER - - SF1wACk LXw RFSTRICIEOA — ® FUOMA �M--C1 BFO ENO SECTION CONCRETE NRR LLFCTRICMRER x'j IGNT t$�I[—{p]ELFCTR <1PPNSFO— UIUNNG UNF ❑O ANt NNOmONEA SIR—m TEIEpNONF pEOESTAI UILOING UNOT G�UYp ENA Cb)—w-�R GRS M—R = --s—F.1 <AP sruE ovERNFAD wIRE 0 coxcRnEsugEACF R Unt-1 F .— CMAINLrv[FFn¢ 1ANOXAPF SURFACE w POST r— IRON FFXCE >Z SIGX —.— NRAE RXCf —e— WOODEEXCF OECIOUOUSTREF <OrvGERvuRTRFF �kSambatek www.sambatek.com 12900 wMe-W DOve, Sidle 300 Mlgne�Ika, MN 55343 763.476 61101 763,476.05321—hile Eglneazig I9unigig I PINWne 1 EmvamenW Client DUKE REALTY CORPORATION 1600 UTICA AVENU E SOUTH SUITE 250 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 Project WEST END - UNDEVELOPED Location ST. LOUIS PARK, MN Certification Summary o,ilorawn.a ve Awro&_ Book/Pace: Sou/u ifts. InIffl IsweA m/w/ , Revision History Na. Date 9y Submittal/Revision Sheet Title ALTA/ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEY iheet No. Revision 3/3 'roject No. DUK18420.01 MTN80H-A MIX MM 31V4 N`d�d L6lb-S49-199 3NOHd WaM iLLS S NW 'lnVd '15 Sg�gti AB 03NJ3HJ [� �,,,/ V /� LO Nesz 311ns '1s3M 3ntl ulsa3nlrvn ossz JN�S V Hd Tl V/ 13/ O 1d�1NdQ�SDH 014 p m a3aWnN 3SN3JIl N% SlW N Ua�H (��Ii� a NMtl3O NW 'J�311V/� N3a10`J/>12� dd SI(101 '1S oN w r _ 3N,lVd 'g SV�fll MW8A8 03NOI530 1S�M � � � w 'o o w �a33NION3 NOIS30 31 os Ni Wd IVB UN3� 1S3M112it/d 1b2�1N3O o a 0 O N WW LL wZ J Q O NORTH N°' U_ =a a a 0 V Y R' d OZ OZ OZ Q 00 V,O 00 w Z U' 2 0 Z .0 Q s p Q E p Z d W H W W Y 4fi€ni'i`a�� 1 w a w aw aw M Ku ao a mzoi ?m NoZ aW�rc>YN oNwZ�ZJ�> Ys rvQPao U >imOmJwxwoo O >LO yo a�j0 H�ai9 Nz i >o >- LLa Q oo zO,Zo u 0 P. o =o U oW—rTO' a uoU i Zi w w OZ aw amplz 0, /M LU W I I III } JLI+ Q Z W7 *•3p~.�+.ac+rrtir N W a 00 V co N MTM H-ATNIN'MMM 31VQ L 6lb-SbNH 'i d IS LOZ/Z(J7 Ntfl d � 3 SVH d 4ll99 NW 'lntld '15 WQM NKK 311ns '1S3M 3AV AlIS63ANn os9z SgLg� A8 03N�3HJ z O w lbllN3aIS3b 0l4 0 �O m � 2139WNN 3SN3DIl NW SlW 1S3M L MV48 Ae NMvaa NW 'AAlWA N34100/>I�iVd sinoi '1S o z 2 U.ID/ A� W' 3NAVd svo l e a3N�ls3a o o w H (< 0� Nl ]Vd -IV' JiNDO 1S3M Ai ]Vd Wt JIN30 Z133NI9N3 NOIS30 3ltlOs O O b W W 4 i y Z Z O 2O aU J aw o >a ooay NORTH u°D VU Z �u� a�2a VI �K w0 aQWa VO my J JU KFw aO 1d m ia gO Z wQ UO�in2 � w f x >rcw�0 �O Om rc ULL a�mOG d¢ a 00 -Zz;OU K i N a W D W a N Q 0 O' -r❑ m opw— 10 ow.o xW h - mZaw ~ w ,-8,- Z y 0 Z O o a �SOam¢aaJ y��az ypj ¢ Ou1-OwdaZ mUwz Zxd 3 k w i 3>>aoJz9000aoOrcw rc 0 oe azarc`J"��rc xK �,Wnrcwa z 0 x� o rc a ¢ z rca a Vwz 0pOQzzwoazia aLL OoJ-W—g �z..tOUOz M J UN ZZFa ZF F>x0>O>WO W U J m O O U d O D U K� m W K a w o �S J .JJazzaoamo w ¢ rc rc 0 m. C a J a z a Z wz c Sz ....... S zzaaWa�aam o h N W <m N o 000ww MJ v a w w C7 am o�VaVV�a�?�(on�>u II °` z a Z 1 z w N w Ia. co rm- ARTS H19T ID T.1 N 1 I I I 1 ow z 6 w a � x Q v > H Z Q Olg Nlo Y W � OI� � u u 1 m co r— CD V M N WOJ'NdOH-A 3lWIN'MMM 31V4 L6lb-S4NN 'i :3NONd sioz/z-V NVld Z 3S`dHd bllSS NW iNtld '1S WaM N8£Z ains'1S3M 3AV AIISi13 Mn OSSZ S8LN 3 AB 43H�3HJ IVUN3aIS3b MG FD z o � N d38WliN 35.3311 NW SIN 1S3M Mwe AS NMdaa NW `,kAlIVA N3MOEYAi ]Vd sino-i 1S �o _ U�O! A� ' 3NAVd SVGA] 9 03N,,,3, o o w H K\„\\ I .� NaVd ]V2UN30 1S3M MVd IV/ UN30 N a O Ii33N19N3 NOIS30 3IVJS O N O W W 4 z N h w Ah W Q J Q `”2 °Fa °Z- I— NORTH uC, pV Z- N 5UW O Ww V m�1 QZ UdZ Q� 2 d Q Z W ¢ . OJ Q jo U a F 2 m 2 Q O <ooz?a ay° omw�ww v�ircrc U Q10�Oa W°w W � 0 Q Z F W m 2 2,0(11. FOS „Z-pLL''n dMW 2"zz< W W W 0QOW w Q 3aOQNz° ��oN K U' ] N OWd ppOF� Z O QH a W �Z W �F�yyQj� j Q z o Z, w oo Z oQ °OZFzJUOz f roOw>0OKQU d J y Z F -U' OZHpmLLa- ~ ° _ W ° wa5o (.7 1 '.o9� wa°ry II � W J D V' w 1 Z W 1 QNN JAI l Q m U pV0 111 p a LL o d N =,o j _ i 3 r� � r r �r '� or v/ 5/ r / / r / r r ' r � / / I I r 7 rr r / Q m U pV0 111 p a LL o d N =,o ss 91 E B F „ ms K 1 1 2 I 3 1 4 I 5 I 6 1 7 8 I 9 1 10 Ll-- ""'` 156- UNDERGROUND STALIS PRIVATELY OWI . PUB WENS ' ; s ` III !moi ... .... .. ,.. LOT 1- RESIDENTIAL PHASE 1 ; STORIES- MUN n R-15TU!VELSrALR LOT3 HOTEL i I 1R6-UNDEWROUNDST.IS -I '-'.� 6STORIES -ISO ROOM 30 - UNDERGROUND STP CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY - 1 PHASE STATE;z loo 11 1 12 113 1 14 I 15 1 16 LEGEND CITY PROPERTY LINE I ROW — — LOT LINE PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER -_-- EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER EXISTING BUILDING L m O PHASING LEGEND = - PHASE III -HOTEL �p= SPRING 2016 - FALL 2017 (EXACT TIMING OF DEVELOPMENT MAY VARY DEPENDING ON MARKET CONDITIONS) i 1{I. < 1 DESCRIPTION OF PHASE III WORK: HOTEL = w x _CONSTRUCT PARKING AREAS AND BUILDING -TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION PARKING SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN THE -0 3 PROJECT SITE, OUTSIDE OF CONSTRUCTION AREA. SNOW SHALL BE PLACED ON VACANT LOT TO SOUTH -TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION STAGING AREAS SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN PROJECT SITE, OUTSIDE OF CONSTRUCTION AREA. -TEMPORARY HOTEL OVERFLOW PARKING WILL BE ACCOUNTED FOR ON THE " VACANT AREA ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RESIDENTIAL PHASE 1. IF OFFICE i DEVELOPMENT OCCURS SIMULTANEOUSLY THEN TEMPORARY OVERFLOW PARKING WILL BE SHARED WITH RESIDENTIAL PHASE 1 AND OLIVE GARDEN (FUTURE RESIDENTIAL) LOTS. Z d � m 0 O 0 v N - O 0 0 3 Y Z 0_ Q w w Z Q= w U D_ z W J J Q W > J z Q Y Lu 1- QJ W O 0 cl J �2 Cn W Of Z0_Lu J 5 0 U O Z J U) DATE 02/02/2015 PROJECT N0. GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 160755001 0 40 80 160 SHEET NUMBER PH -3 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 11 1 12 13 14 15 16 A E_ LEGEND CITY PROPERTY LINE / ROW B — — LOT LINE PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER --..----- EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER 7-7— EXISTING BUILDING �t L O � TEMPDRMOFFIa OVERFLOW PHASING LEGEND (; vARRrGIFovna DEvuovMEnr w o * OCCURS SIMULTANEOUSLY F Z E N tt E PHASE IV -OFFICE PHASE 1 'S o a .. SPRING 2016 -FALL 2017 (EXACT TIMING OF DEVELOPMENT MAY VARY �/I� � � T DEPENDING ON MARKET CONDITIONS) DESCRIPTION OF PHASE IV WORK' u w CONSTRUCT OFFICE SURFACE & RAMP PARKING AREAS UTICA AVENUE SOUTH N i a CONSTRUCT OFFICE BUILDING -TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION PARKING SHALL BE LOCATED IN EXISTING SURFACE PARKING LOT ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE OFFICE PHASE 1, OUTSIDE O OF CONSTRUCTION AREAS (SEE PLAN FOR GENERAL LOCATION). v' SNOW SHALL BE HAULED OFF-SITE. -TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION STAGING AREAS SHALL BE LOCATED IN A D 9 �-� C i VACANT AREA IN THE EXISTING SURFACE PARKING LOT ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE OFFICE PHASE 1, OUTSIDE OF CONSTRUCTION AREAS (SEE PLAN FOR ".. LOT 2 -RESIDENTIAL PHASE 2 GENERAL LOCATION). GSTORIES.161UNR5 -HOTEL OVERFLOW PARKING TO BE PROVIDED IN RAMP PER AGREEMENT WITH ' TEMPoaur 79 -1ST LEVEL STALLS OFFICE USERLo w coxnRurnox vaRgxG 156- UNDERGROUND STALLS -LILAC DRIVE MAY BE TEMPORARILY CLOSED DURING CONSTRUCTION OF z : aREA UFSARFARK I OUTLOTA NORTH PARKING RAMP a O N .a PRIVATELVOW ❑ w u7 OFFICE vueuc WEN =�� — 777 V z N O w uxofRumDxo NO swsrDRr J N J� O E .+ 5 z J o PHASE IV L; LOT 1- \ —% m m 3 E consrRumox �/ RESIDENTIAL PHASE 1 �� STAGING AREA "�7 I 66TOIIIF$-199 UNDS r 7R-urLEVELs'ALLS LOT 3 -HOTEL �� 196-uxOEROROUND STAuS I, 6STOMES 150 ROOMS f 30-UNOERGROUNO WALIS CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK CITY OF G71DEN VALLEY111111 MIN 1111111 IIILFF F app I � I 1- I ESA' Z In RAMPVERaOR�MENT�_ , Q' wDH oveceusER� / 1; N I �1.P� TO.IFORARY 4 oon RKIWrn I ARKING AREA W dr ui a Ip �i F Q G Z USC DW RIVE TEMPORARY HOTEL OVERFLOW o PARMNG IF OFRLF DEVEIOPMEW OCCUR55IMULTAHEOUSLY STATE HIGHWAY — ....1 5 10p p w E J H _ Q 2 LU Z Q Y Lu0 Z Q J Lu a O J (n Q Lu Of of I a U Z J W u) 0 U O Z J 0 F— J) DAIL 02/02/2015 K o PROJECT NO. GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 160755001 0 40 80 160 SHEET NUMBER PH -4 0 00 r— (f) O Ln v Cl) N NO0'NNOH-A31WIM'MMM L6L4-S49-LS9 3NOHd *LL99 NH'lnYd is S, Boz/zo/Zo'31V0 92L9 -V NOM AS 03MO3HD Nt]d S 3SVHdnom �t/I1N341S321 Sia z o Lo Ng4z 311ns'IS3 3AV A ISaJAINn oSSz UJOH�<<�3IWI� 839WNN 35N3011 NW SlW� Ae NMV210 1S�M >QJVd ]Vd UN30 NW 'A3�WA N3M0S/>QJVd SIf10i 1S 1S3M>Ibt/d �t/2ilN3S �o r � , Lrc) � ° � w 2 LL - 3NAVd 'D SVOf l MWeA9 03NOI530 � �i133NI0N3 MGMMGM31tl05 o � N O b W � W 11 _Z x yl W'o i z o NORTH N ❑ w Q> i r rc v U Q ¢ CL CL L1 X �0 W m Z a Z Qm ¢ W O O Q OJ QQNQIZ Z W U U m N W j y>j � � < a W ❑ Y W ❑ Q W O Q wO O RF w z f UZ Yep Ub MW29 ZULLZZsOF W w 0 O❑OOWZ O O7 N U >1 ~ �JwUpw 00Y a, 0 ❑a IQWKLL�F o=nU'Yf R(027 O>U w 0ZFJi<Qp0LL�QN�zJiG4aaw��w�Kw a W m LLmF rcU m M¢ o>m 2LLz oo<owmo,W CL wd Z 0 �wuuua,r0¢Z- Mw-w �WLL ZwmZZ O Z y w ZZs O 00ZLU 000YQ v `? o a W w pus (' ja20 amo oYYV� W '?�arroVa W Z NI C7 1 I Nl � J 0� co rl- co V m N '.I OZ/ZO/Z0�31H0 VJOM 98L9b A9 03NO3H0 NV-ld 9 3S`dHd vl � 639WHN 35N3OI3 NN Slh IVUN3(11S3b Ola z g ? CD Aa NMvaa 1S3M NW '),DSI A N3a100/-AaVd sinoi '1S oN "� 3NOd ') svom Mw8 0 o O w AB 03N01530 \ �1 iZib'd 1d�IlN30 1S3M >i2ib'd It/2i1N30 0 w � N LL :a33NI0N3 NOIS30 31vos O W W W 2 W J QO NORTH co U_ a o: ca O NO *NdOH-A31HIN"MMM LBIb-S49-159 3NOHd 411S5 NN inVd '15 U.IH f0 Ins •is3� �� iNnlri�' � 7b N Q 0 O 2 Y a0 Z W W Z Q Z � U O W J U m U U > 4 � J Z z Z W y -0 wZ a0 U a W W V ozEW - J Z1; 1 I Z w c7 I i Aa al � 0� co rl- co V m N '.I OZ/ZO/Z0�31H0 VJOM 98L9b A9 03NO3H0 NV-ld 9 3S`dHd vl � 639WHN 35N3OI3 NN Slh IVUN3(11S3b Ola z g ? CD Aa NMvaa 1S3M NW '),DSI A N3a100/-AaVd sinoi '1S oN "� 3NOd ') svom Mw8 0 o O w AB 03N01530 \ �1 iZib'd 1d�IlN30 1S3M >i2ib'd It/2i1N30 0 w � N LL :a33NI0N3 NOIS30 31vos O W W W 2 W J QO NORTH co U_ a o: ca O Q m U p4� o LU a,U- � 7b f U,� ED I 1 Fa��g ozEW - � -. - 1 A3� �U= l 2 a 4'! ti — -- r c U/ u j ! � Ici� Y1 J _a�4 jj r jt�j71 Q m U p4� o LU a,U- B 3 Ic 1 1 2 1 3 1 8 1 9 1 10 9UIS PARK 6p Ll I I I I I4 40 I I I I I ARAGE p 4- LF 4xa B7 "-4C DRIVE VA 7-E A Jlrf PUD - . . ......... UTICA AVENUE SOUTH 7777777777777--=777771 TURNAROUND AREA 44 L L- OFFICE #1 9 STORIES - 30,W4 SF/STORY OFFICE #2 I j OFFICE 113 TOTAL 277,555 5F9 STORIES - 30,804 SF/STORY 1 STOR JES - 30,8D4 SF/STORV 9 TOTAL 277,S55 SIF TOTAL 277,555 SIF EXISTING HEALTH PARTNERS CITY F ST. LO_UI Cl Of f/ PARKIQ GARAGE Mill I 1 111 1 L PIIGHL4/AV 7M APPROVED PUD - 2008 11 1 12 1 13 1 14 A GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 0 40 80 160 15 CENTRAL PARK WEST SITE DATA TABLE CURRENT PUD (2008) VS PROPOSED PUD (2015) POFFICE DESCRIPTION CURRENTLY APPROVED PUD (2008) DLC RESIDENTIAL PROPOSED PUD (2015) — — - -------- - 706,706 SIF TUR 150 ROOMS RESIDENTIAL MFA 363 UNITS* PARKING RAMP 1,360,336 SIF 720,251 SIF PARK SIZE 0.75 ACRES 0.87 ACRES PT A PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC 1,883 TRIPS 1,486 TRIPS �, LINEAR PARK OUTLOT B - OUTLOT B - "An" o USUCOPENS SOUTH OFFICE NORTH OFFICE 11 STORIES-32,1235F/STORY O 11 STORIES- TOTAL 353,353 32,123 SFjSTORY 50- TOTAL 353,353 SF SO UNDERGROUND STALLS EXISTING HEALTH PARTNERS 9UIS PARK 6p Ll I I I I I4 40 I I I I I ARAGE p 4- LF 4xa B7 "-4C DRIVE VA 7-E A Jlrf PUD - . . ......... UTICA AVENUE SOUTH 7777777777777--=777771 TURNAROUND AREA 44 L L- OFFICE #1 9 STORIES - 30,W4 SF/STORY OFFICE #2 I j OFFICE 113 TOTAL 277,555 5F9 STORIES - 30,804 SF/STORY 1 STOR JES - 30,8D4 SF/STORV 9 TOTAL 277,S55 SIF TOTAL 277,555 SIF EXISTING HEALTH PARTNERS CITY F ST. LO_UI Cl Of f/ PARKIQ GARAGE Mill I 1 111 1 L PIIGHL4/AV 7M APPROVED PUD - 2008 11 1 12 1 13 1 14 A GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 0 40 80 160 15 CENTRAL PARK WEST SITE DATA TABLE CURRENT PUD (2008) VS PROPOSED PUD (2015) POFFICE DESCRIPTION CURRENTLY APPROVED PUD (2008) DLC RESIDENTIAL PROPOSED PUD (2015) 1,1110,220 SF 706,706 SIF HOTEL 150 ROOMS RESIDENTIAL - 363 UNITS* PARKING RAMP 1,360,336 SIF 720,251 SIF PARK SIZE 0.75 ACRES 0.87 ACRES PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC 1,883 TRIPS 1,486 TRIPS �, * 3% OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS WILL BE DEDICATED TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING # FEB 0 4 2015 1 B'(:-- 0 16 0 w, o E Z§ z 0 U) < a- 2 w 0 Z Lli C/) < ELI > Z < 0 Lu F - Z < '_j ULJ 0 cl) < LU ofCCC� I-- < z a. _j LIJ c/) 0 —i F - DATE 02/02/2015 PROJECT NO, 160755001 SHEET NUMBER EX. 1 I *s - -i � I 'Hatched re. mPress...... s areas ncluded m F nal PUD. Areas outside hatch will require a or me amendmentnt to the Final amendment PUD at a later date. SITE DIAGRAM I— - PROJECT PROJECT LOCATION .a qaw s Nwr valley v Af t u �p s F a� }} �'� � �� � w+L .fir " @ t`. _ �s/`+--•• � _� � � � � I 4 St Louis P Vicini Site Location Cen CENTRAL PARK WEST FINAL PUD''` Ph1 deal.&Zrk West Hwy 100 & 1-394 - Golden Valley/St. Louis Park - MN PROJECT TEAM 0wre 1DWelooer: DLC RESIDENTIAL, LLC 21500 Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 402 Avenmra, FL 33180 Ph: 612-325-9767 Architect; Elness Swenson Graham Architects Inc. 500 Washington Ave. South, Suite 1080 Minneapolis, MN 55415 Ph: 612-339-5508 Fz: 612-339-5382 Civil a Landscape: Kimley-Horn and Associates 2550 University Ave West, Suite 238N St. Paul, MN 55114 Ph: 651-6451197 Contractor: DLC RESIDENTIAL, LLC 21500 Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 402 Aventura, FL 33180 Ph: 612-325-9767 Structural Enuineer Meyer Borgman Johnson 510 Marquette Avenue South, Suite 900 Minneapolis, MN 55402 Ph: 612-338-0713 Fz: 612-337-5325 UNIT MIX & SQUARE FOOTAGES DLC 't' Kimsey*Horn i li Soo was hlnpton r u a th 1 Dans mann sola55415 2 3 3 9 5 5 0 www e s g a r c h c a m FINAL PUD February 2, 201 S ORIGINAL I5SUE: ozsae. is REV 1510 N$ N.. os:rriPt— oats 21 mu145... — ESG au ESG_ Central Park West Phase 162 TITLE SHEET T1.1 Future Phase 3 - Hotel Phase 2 - Residential Ph,q.,;p 1 - Rp-qiripntiql Future Future Phase 4-5 - Office Phn -,p A - nff irp Future CeVftaIPaMW"" Parkwest -Arun PUD St tees., Park] CoAde. V.Re, MN S), The ,£quest at the paint N. Tor Foal PUDJPYt ApWovaN #ar BNases land Mart, YMsupaag wW ht giver( laBpmvah dtrougha mato, amerrdrwrd tathe Frei BUD ata tater date (Xw4U)(*V Site Design and Public Benefits: Primiplas and Purpose • Mkedtue Miaam SF i- PUD -W-1) sf, trafFaJmgn sed 6rcai€a rodwirsg the Barking camp axe P14Ik 'It A ­urs,, Water Fee". UI- 0 -41 -Id I-- A—Y VV% —W 5—t—W and L.Ilk.W k— N"" W h—dr,W-ts, and -4, - It[ Ip66,art square leer of OYfitt yurc, 353 tttxvbnbai uteri arae up fo ISO -w,awn Entry kapkk —w-rur., f—dese P"—ee, P.,64 .0 Jtaft,*, Life Cycle and Affordable Housing Uft W. In Ile-ide,,bel bwNings,,tesla c. atidl Barge al unittypn sed.. to Iw— ob—, r-- U Mall, P.,k and C'ehea,, VAlk, imludingamptX —, f-4- and Mdkniah AfutdabW thAtL Tr, IeVal—1 blMITVP a N1 Kwlde 3% IMVItabll uriN at fiU AMI JA ­V .—hp, —al ArdflUadarad Design R&OdfttW SelfidieIs lahenn I And 2, Tht, Pfiaa 1460 2 btakfi,%, .01 Matall, -,, r,8h Mra, rg, [hat -.Pats with the St w- P,,p Asehitts.,maF G ­w—, -j, wt, ruse f TYW 1 —4-11 (A, iaaxYraad M the package).. the rtxwm:lat bk&,,p S and f aro ra,xksotl V, a II0 1,,-H IF sesduNa, a, this Pa ,V FIV41 PUD App,m,6 foe IV— lwm bwl6,,,, .,ad to fount In a trdlrra,al -,,hbaK-gi that was build —1 —1 Irdw, K-1 "N, tm-, IV— V,and tWltt n—, Md— tV,— artax with taw—, fee pt,`1 I-Iw —19 -4 61,AV's k,ahttw, V -MM lara, with—duh *,.hr" .,4 -t, I Son —— W .01U.S—d hiking 4.1s, —d and I ­Md a," W ¥reared take sk—f, amd 4-1 kadlarc Phase "'am"UA*W Ilse future M.. Baa id 5 -061- WI —0 I-- d— A The s— 0- ^V,, huiWmgs are,atAdaspla,,-,,patsat thm pant ,, ar th, wdi 6t apprertd m ttu !urate ax parrot a rtujw amemtment W Iht Frei PUD. as poet of a mato, ammdrntnt to SN k1nW PUD III VVI, p'.p—d FasHz,xg si—w,e i5 meant t,, &,RV, the crew 4MY W40 H,gf—" 1VO -V* .11 b, P, -.,a at Or, Vs—v e, 6.1,11- Valley Carer's PL—V of NU Baobwsed patWx 3 W-tf,w h,.Ay L-d"Ped tree, W*, Alm, the ." ter" wAl r.,th,, create a WhIl hr— Mu hea—, The P.,*.%st—I—pketmtnt eking th,' (1—a, . arVa w of the —At leevverl U. hVhMI, -p— Vlthe Vfke — rew— w the I"A FVu— Ph—e #WUL IM rotate Pharr 3 KOO wd1 Ila— —I high 4—fit, i­lw- vd.1— that tgmpi- wid, OVI St t- PA A,,hraVw,4 G.Va,4—, 4"," — Pu,,, keepm at 0. r—, xa rha ow --d —,a rr the FUSurt az Pars sof a matin atosndmant Eo Sha Firraf PUD. Grown and Susiburtable, F*Oum tandtxmm xmi au,vYoruottd cvmmaraty drat atksrn ,£rider alive. work, xra play wid,aut • Our saloaulabu, &.0 .40.. lh—athtIt wkkva, y,—, v— bwkr., 6—ty, k%h "i,,, psdtsbUn xmt isx.Xnt pwbfrc. rearm awl va--of natural tauuxcts. • This Pmied"ftttuttaserks dt V-. elke,aerns, —1w," F, -n saarti,a,,ma—V; t; -'r -a—, M-1 Nth aff­, wi,drran and the Y1. F—gy &,lo A-,.,- P,W— E,Mtv ,!k—t 0-,pa,,q -- —.1, s,, .4-t twrlding s..— p4gh haa" and cagking L— t— pl..&rg I—. II, -d— Use f L— E,rj -v &U-1, a,,It —tarft, P.—, am —0,,p ami ueEuung Ek-,. _h,M, charging in parkerg a— �— rllycle s -.,W I. Oad.—d k KI) at Vff., Inno"that strum W~ managermant k,,y the IF,,—I—wa,oe --,— system that .,a .-, thn Vf the tit—sad wat,I,,ad D—, • Th, kw mpxttrI."-t — A; —, # a rnrnMnatwsr at d.—Va,and timtics tetanies Mat -11 --4 the —h wlurnt etdunaan and pm. P -MVI —1-11Y w,dtagramd chetrn and uhkred tq iyragate d+e part and public aster, ant ,term watt txverlkxY arta the ,at -sandy —h whit 1h, —IN- dw Nq,, to A wakta teabpe tpsxt pent m khe wntraF µark wits sora* as a visual ymp audible Pubkix amenity. ax wee an ed—What ,psrhI.M, eqaam that Me warty n th,,, ,W ra dw s-. wa,V, irtdernPnY train. Signage 41-0�1 W— 'Al --I d -1+V —Ih U,V o" of $1, L— Pack and (,.Id- Vsk,, W,,aft a -4t Rooftop medwrikal N41-1 1.aVrrs,,,t, —1 -VI; r1w xorrtdwz and -- --,afff 1,a k—d — M, raaftgx Central Park West Phase 1 &2 DLC Residential FINAL PUD February 2, 201 5 REVISIONS o. Derr rip tion Date 2 14521 ESG_ ESG_ .11 PIA. Central Park West Phase I&2 NARRATIVE A 0.1 DEVELOPED SITE EXISTING SITE Central Park West Phase 1&2 DLC Reside Nti.l mm F - e sG FINAL PUD February 2, 201 5 ORIGINAL 155UE: azrazi�s REVISIONS N.. Description Date 214521 ESC ESC Central Park West Phase 1&2 CONCEPTUAL RENDERINGS - EXISTINC & PROPOSED A 0.2 PARK DESIGN PERSPECTIVES PRECEDENT IMAGES CENTRAL PARK Central Park West Phase 1&2 DLC Residential Kimiey*Hoo esG FINAL PUD February 2, 201 5 ORIGINAL IS—: ...... is REVISIONS No. Description Dale 214521 ESD ESG III ILAI Central Park West Phase 162 CONCEPTUAL RENDERINGS + PRECEDENT — CENTRAL PARK A 0.3 CO LU F— L) LLI CL U) cr LU CL Z 0 U) LLI 0 LU a - C) (n F— LLI LLI m F— U) C) F- +OV C) ol 'po roti D CO LU F— L) LLI CL U) cr LU CL Z 0 U) LLI 0 LU a - C) (n F— LLI LLI m F— U) C) F- C) CO LU F— L) LLI CL U) cr LU CL Z 0 U) LLI 0 LU a - C) (n F— LLI LLI m F— U) C) F- WOONERF DESIGN PERSPECTIVES PRECEDENT IMAGES WOONERF AUTO -PEDESTRIAN COURT Central Park West Phase 1&2 DLC Residential FINAL PUD February 2, 201 5 ORIGINAL ISSUE: at .1— REVISION5 Na. Description Date 214521 ESG E5G Central Park West Phase 1 &2 CONCEPTUAL RENDERINGS + PRECEDENT - WOONERF A 0.5 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN PERSPECTIVES Allianz Ramp Colonnade Ramp Buffer new development from the visual and acoustic blight caused by the massive (+/- 30' high and +/- 400' wide) Highway 100 concrete freeway through careful placement of the proposed parking facility and heavily landscaped tree buffer along Lilac Drive, on the east edge south of the Gateway GOLDEN VALLEY PARKING RAMP PRECEDENTS GREEN WALL PRECEDENT IMAGES FINAL PARKING STRUCTURE DESIGN WILL BE APPROVED THROUGH A MAJOR AMENDMENT TO THE FINAL PUD AT A FUTURE DATE PARKING STRUCTURE/ GOLDEN VALLEY PED/BIKE LINK Central Park West Phase 1&2 DLC Resid—.1 Dec Kimley>)) Horn esc FINAL PUD February 2, 201 5 ORIGINAL 155UE. ,, e.is REV15IONS o. Descrl —n D- 2 145 2 1 ale214521 ESC ESG Central Park West Phase 1&2 CONCEPTUAL RENDERINGS + PRECEDENT - PARKING RAMP A 0.6 3 DESIGN PERSPECTIVES PRECEDENT IMAGES PHASE 1 & 2 - RESIDENTIAL LOBBY SPACES Central Park West Phase 1&2 DLC R -dermal DLC . IGmley*ftn elness Swenson graham are hlteits 5p0 was hlnptpn a utM1 m lnneap.h,m an 55415 13 nq sp[5 S 3 p a 3 p 5 d 2 wwwesq archcom e�N.............. �d O"o, G� FINAL PUD February 2, 201 5 D RIGINAL ISSUE: ozrpzris —111DN5 Ne. Deseript- Date 214521 ESG ESG DRAWN IV CHECKLD SY Central Park West Phase 1&2 CONCEPTUAL RENDERINGS + PRECEDENT - LOa BY A 0.7 PHASE 1 AMENITY TERRACE PERSPECTIVE PHASE 2 AMENITY TERRACE PERSPECTIVE PRECEDENT IMAGES PHASE 1 & 2 - RESIDENTIAL AMENITY TERRACES Central Park West Phase 1&2 DL Re, a.Ia DLC Kimley*Flom ur.h.m "c Mucrs .Ih m ln6n e'a 6 I ww wesg archcom � xerex� �ernry �nn„xia ao�umem rs, FINAL PUD February 2, 201 5 DRILINAL 155UE: uxrazi�s R EV IS ID NS N.. De. o"'.. D.te 2 1452 1 ESG ESG Central Park West Phase 1&2 CONCEPTUAL RENDERINGS + PRECEDENT - AMENITY TERRACE A 0.8 PHASE 1 — BUILDING CODE ANALYSIS IMEMSMIMEMEMMM= A-4 S.— AS r,,— A-—, � SEs ovals?mP�- A.�'. Aq SoV­ E,­atbrF. !nm taxn:mn� arc paw MMx+eww'£ 51 ­ 1rO­V` In" IRA a— v_ Area IS— as,— xE(KG Momma r't>.w+ ­VVVd Ls±rsx. .wgnY o�tazrnRw.ka wM,mnezkw sm ror Ara a acnz« reqs 5— IVnm,, mora ea KKN IN. XI I: razxs AE IaaeF-+rt'saam is T5% — 1- Aa M. JAI a ej . JAI. �.9 .90 C+A'tae,rapM E ­ a--- w- 2aata+Mz+Umbe:y wawa Dart.^c w" '—' A 1,— p-, I,'. — and — I— ... E= 8_� wax See RtaI, 2 ­ Inc TwIE, W ­ Oz+s�cv, IV,.V P- W ax W., „s 3 '}Shan Fxa namnirm Y4 06 a S� G- I "a ,M06 lw: I-1 M, EYa+­ a I.— _� �, __ a, p aI,.. _'a" - z6.,Na A O -A DESIGN PERSPECTIVES TINIe a01 tactor I w C 7 X,1 , Nv, aEw"',4 " WVM..L", PHASE 1 - RESIDENTIAL Central Park West Phase 1 &2 DLC aaemsNud DLC ME=* eSG FINAL PUD February 2, 201 S ORIGINALISSUE REVISIONS Na. D-Iliptill D­ 2145ZI ESL_ ESG_ 21AW, 11 1 - Central Park West Phase 1&2 PHASE I – RESIDENTIAL RENDERINGS + CODE PLAN A 0.9 PHASE 2 - BUILDING CODE ANALYSIS T" *a Atha ?r A'{pA ateiM!4eat'Reu: Atlssab;a,yrtt NL` Aron :raaern Attae3 m? vnGuaeXnGiCMKI I In— I W_ laa. I s­A­ a_- ­ E_ a-- W_ aw wrvvimah^vwr Wda W atiaf'.0a earn f.`S rase Mm:rtxUrea.Ybe oxtifrn pot Tarim YOr;r ebmttW tMM vats as % PESIDEN-iAl A on AS a 0 c Q, =cklw,321S 1A0 21 3) A, aaxmw2 _w'Ysto+ �Z,V2aoa B.dnja_ A,,­ ,IXI3 1 .gpA,v 10"10, W-1—II'I A— to ea.Yr owa:V_ DESIGN PERSPECTIVES w11___1_ i1____ ­w a _11_1­ek .1%ANcode 1wS _ ^ , , PHASE 2 - RESIDENTIAL Central Park West Phase 1 &2 DLC R—d—ti.1 DLC ZMEMM esG FINAL PUD February 2, 201 S ORIGINALISSUE: ortozrfs REV15IONS e. Des rrlb[lon Dale 214521 E5G_ ESG_ Central Park West Phase 162 PHASE 2 - RE51DENTIAL RENDERINGS CODE PLAN A 0.1 0 b R Central Park West Phase 1&2 DLC R-d—IM D L C Kimley4lll0m I s c M c o n, F -- FINAL PUD February 2, 2015 ORIGINALISSUE lt--s No. D' -1p,1.. Date 214521 ... J— ...... ESC_ ESG_ Central Park West Phase 1 &2 PHI - LEVEL PI PLAN PHI Al .0 12 -4' 16 8 30'-0' Central Park West Phase 1&2 DLC R-d—IM D L C Kimley4lll0m I s c M c o n, F -- FINAL PUD February 2, 2015 ORIGINALISSUE lt--s No. D' -1p,1.. Date 214521 ... J— ...... ESC_ ESG_ Central Park West Phase 1 &2 PHI - LEVEL PI PLAN PHI Al .0 4�� (Wp vw1w — 13 14 41(R9) Central Park West Phase 1&2 .1c R -d-11.1 D L C Kimley,))Horn ­harchitects — ,I. . . A Polis li—s— —, S P. 6 1 2. I S 9. , S. . I.. I . . . . 9. . . . . I A A h . c I o'o, 'k 0 FFINAL PUD February 2, 201 5 ORIGINAL ISSUE: R—sr.., N, D.",Iptl,. D". 214521 ESG_ ESG_ DRAWN 9V CHECKED 4V .11 ".. Central Park West Phase 1&2 PHI - LEVEL 1 PLAN PHI Al .1 NSA PH1 LEVEL 2 1--I- A0 -I- 4 Central Park West Phase 1&2 DLC R -d -till DLC Kimleyl>Horn • .I.— —n— -h.. arc hi.ec.s min p. 6 1 r c h ..... ..... . ......... FINAL PUD February 2, 201 5 GRID INA L ISSUE: REV15 10 NS N.. D.—ipti.. Oate 214521 ... R- U.... ESG_ ESG_ — p— Central Park W— Phase 1&2 PHI — LEVEL 2 PLAN PHI A 1 .2 N 3 4 PI -111 LEVEL 3 (45 SIM) kta �11 I � 191 Central Park West Phase 1&2 DLC Residential DLC KimleylHorn elness -.s.. g,sh,. -chi—t. polls minnes otat 55015 L I I 1 3 9 C 1 3 0 Z` 0 Go FINAL PUD February 2, 201 5 ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS N, D—Hpti.. ..I, 214521 1R.- I u... SR ESG_ E5G_ Central Park West Phase 162 PHI - LEVEL 3-5 PLAN PH 1 A 1 .3 191 "Ir = — 51. Louis Park � Odden valley Eel Central Park West Phase 1&2 DLC Residential esc; FINAL PUD February 2, 201 5 ORIGINAL155UE: REVISIONS N.. D11,11P11.. Oate 210521 ESL_ ESG— Central Park West Phase 1&2 PHI — LEVEL 6 PLAN PI -11 A1.4 ROOF EVEL6 161' 4" IS EL5 O' O' 30EL_4 _LEVEL- V t2T-4' LEVEL 2 116-0" _ LevEL 1 100• - a 1_ _ EVELPI I\ 1 �1 PH1 - E2 - SOUTH ELEVATION - West I 1 1 1 E4 I E1 I O ES E6 O I E2 1 �— 91 L9ula Pvkl OMRM, Valley —� EXTERIOR MATERIAL KEYNOTES - PHASE I jA-1 BRICK -1181B-1 BRICKBANDIND COLOR M-1 BUfNISHEDBLOCK COLOR91 SA -1 PRE FINISHED MICRORIBBED METAL PANEL -DARK BRONZE COLOR 58-1 PREFINISHEDRIBSEDMETALPANEL-COPPERPEWJVCOLOR SC -1 PREFIMSHED METAL PANEL - OLIVE -LOH SA 1 ABETLANINATI TA -1 sTLICCOCOLORat SA -1 COMPOSITE WINDOWS PA -1 DECORATIVE MECHANICAL GRILLE 1M-1 ALUMINUM AND GLASS BALCONY 11 PREFINISHED ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM W1 FRITTED PATTERNING PHASE E2 -SOUTH ELEVATION TOTAL SURFACE AREA 35,807 Sq. Ft. Class I Material Coverage- 67% ('ImluEes 1%cove MA. Lammers PanN1 Class 11 Material Coverage 33% Class III Material Coverage 0% _ ,ROOF t 2-B LEVELb 161 -d" LEVELI , O L11 Ll 3S' -B LEVEL 3 12T -4 BEVEL 2 1 a B9' -o 1 1 1 V. E2 - SOUTH ELEVATION - East I - Central Park West Phase 1&2 DLC ReslAential DLC Kimieyl Horn elness sWenson graham arch Nests Sqq whinye mnepels3ma e 'T' h 3 9. 5 3 a 3 www . e s g a r c h c q m FINAL PUD February 2, 201 5 ORICINALISSUE: az,oz is REVISIONS N.. Descrlptlon Dale 214521 ESG ESG Central Park West Phase 162 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS PH1 A3.1 LEVEL, I\ 161'-4 V LEVEL 5 I\ ;EVEL4 /l LEVEL3 Il LEVEL3 Il 116'-O' IDo1 00'-O V 1 — _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ t_ _ LEVELPOF- I ll z PHI - E4 - NORTH ELEVATION - East 33P - t'-0 I E1 E3 E¢ ES E7 I 0 ' -- SI Laulc PaMI GdOan Vallry EXTERIOR MATERIAL KEYNOTES - PHASE I to -1 BRICR-COLORRI tat aRICR BANGING -colon az 9A-1 BURNISHEDBLOCR-COLORgI SA-1PRE FINISHED MICRORIBBED METAL PANEL -DARN BRD—COLOn SB -1 PREFINISHED RIBBED METAL PANEL- COPPER PENNY COLOR SC -1 PREFINISHED METAL PANEL - OLIVE COLOR W-1 ABET LAMINATI >A-1 STUCCO COLO", G-1 C POSITE WINDOWS BA-1DECDRA1IVEMECIWNICALGnl" 10 1ALU MINUMANDGLASSBALCOHY 11A-1 PREFINISHED ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM- FRITTED PATTERNING PHASE E4 -NORTH ELEVATION TOTAL SURFACE AREA 35,987 Sq. Ft. Goldin Vallry' (-Includes...'. eNy—leminati Pmrel M Class It Material Coverage 349/6 Class III Material Coverage 09b ROOF n LEVEL, I\ 161'-4 V LEVEL 5 I\ ;EVEL4 /l LEVEL3 Il LEVEL3 Il 116'-O' IDo1 00'-O V 1 — _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ t_ _ LEVELPOF- I ll z PHI - E4 - NORTH ELEVATION - East 33P - t'-0 I E1 E3 E¢ ES E7 I 0 ' -- SI Laulc PaMI GdOan Vallry EXTERIOR MATERIAL KEYNOTES - PHASE I to -1 BRICR-COLORRI tat aRICR BANGING -colon az 9A-1 BURNISHEDBLOCR-COLORgI SA-1PRE FINISHED MICRORIBBED METAL PANEL -DARN BRD—COLOn SB -1 PREFINISHED RIBBED METAL PANEL- COPPER PENNY COLOR SC -1 PREFINISHED METAL PANEL - OLIVE COLOR W-1 ABET LAMINATI >A-1 STUCCO COLO", G-1 C POSITE WINDOWS BA-1DECDRA1IVEMECIWNICALGnl" 10 1ALU MINUMANDGLASSBALCOHY 11A-1 PREFINISHED ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM- FRITTED PATTERNING PHASE E4 -NORTH ELEVATION TOTAL SURFACE AREA 35,987 Sq. Ft. Class I Material Coverage' 66% (-Includes...'. eNy—leminati Pmrel M Class It Material Coverage 349/6 Class III Material Coverage 09b '— - — — — — _ _ — — _ — — — — — _ _ — — I PH1 - E4 - NORTH ELEVATION - West 'As n. F EVEL b 161'-4' LEVEL 5 BEVEL 4 3D' -B LEVE -4L 9 127' Ley G O' LEVEL 1 LEVEL r-1�� B9T-OV Central Park West Phase1 &2 DLC Redden LIM DLC Kimley 4) Horn floes, Swanson ­1— ­.d raham arc nacos 5qq was hinglen a uth m In n<apRlls minnes Rtaf 55415 FINAL PUD February 2, 201 5 ORIOINALISSUE: oziaziis REVISION5 Na. Desfrlptien D- 214521 ESG ESG Central Park West Phase 1&2 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS PH 1 A3.2 %� PHi - E1 - WEST _ELEVATION EXTERIOR MATERIAL KEYNOTES - PHASE I IA-, BRICKBANDI aI- 1B-1 BRICK BANDING-COLOLO YM1 BUEFIISHEDBLOCN RIBBER AI 6A-1 PREFINISHED MICPORIOaED METAL PONEL-DARNNYRIONZE WUCOLOR 50-1 PREFINIBHED RIBBED METAL PANEL COPPER PENNY COLOR 6O1 PREFINIBHED METAL PANEL -OLIVE COLOR W-1 ABU LAMIN STUCCO CIXOR Y1 SA -1 COMPOSITE MECOCHAWB SA -1 DECMINUMA DGI-ASICALWNv _1 ALUMINUMATA UMINUMTLCONY 11A1 PREFINIBHED ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM WI FRITTED PATTERNING PHASEI E3 -EAST ELEVATION PHASE 1 Ell -WEST ELEVATION 11,199 Sq. Ft. TOTAL SURFACE AREA 11,701 Sq. Ft. Class I Material Coverage- 63% Class II Material Coverage 35% (-Incl-6%tavereye N -1Y 1—Pa nt) 0% Class II Material Coverage 37% Class III Material Coverage 0% %� PHi - E1 - WEST _ELEVATION EXTERIOR MATERIAL KEYNOTES - PHASE I IA-, BRICKBANDI aI- 1B-1 BRICK BANDING-COLOLO YM1 BUEFIISHEDBLOCN RIBBER AI 6A-1 PREFINISHED MICPORIOaED METAL PONEL-DARNNYRIONZE WUCOLOR 50-1 PREFINIBHED RIBBED METAL PANEL COPPER PENNY COLOR 6O1 PREFINIBHED METAL PANEL -OLIVE COLOR W-1 ABU LAMIN STUCCO CIXOR Y1 SA -1 COMPOSITE MECOCHAWB SA -1 DECMINUMA DGI-ASICALWNv _1 ALUMINUMATA UMINUMTLCONY 11A1 PREFINIBHED ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM WI FRITTED PATTERNING PHASEI E3 -EAST ELEVATION TOTAL SURFACE AREA 11,199 Sq. Ft. Class I Material Coverage' 651/6 (•IrNlutlas 0% mvemgeN A. Leminmi -Q) Class II Material Coverage 35% Class III Material Coverage 0% Central Park West Phase 1&2 E4 DLC R-d—timl I I E1 E3 DLC Ly P E6q__ Ktt'Clley� # orn O f-- 51 Laulc Prkl T3NOen VNIN � elners swe nson graham arc M1itecls OA 500 washin OtYn avenu sRu[M1 m ePulls mo[5R 55015 P. a 1 1 z 3 3 3 9 B s s P e W. wfi 1 2R . 3 39 5 3 e 3 . zg arch conI o, w., EVEL P 1 Ta 1 - E3 - EAST ELEVATION =_ — — _ — _ _ — _ — _ — _ L@VEL P, Il -— _ _ _ _ _ — _ — DR' O 3 PH1 - E5 - COURTYARD EAST ELEVATION z mi: H1- E6 - COURTYARD SOUTH ELEVATION 1 ml: H1 - E7 - COURTYARD WEST ELEVATION IAs T! -1 1 s�_ru• 1 vsr=,�a• FINAL PUD February 2, 201 5 GRID IN AL 155 U E: oziczi�s REVISIONS No. D-11ptlun D- 214521 ESG ESG Central Park West Phase 1&2 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS PH 1 A3.3 Central Park West Phase 1&2 DLC Residential d CPO - -1 FINAL PUD February 2, 201 5 214521 ESG_ ESG_ GRA. N By CHECKED SV — 11- QLEVEL Pi Cenral Park West 1-1. - PH2 - LEVEL PI PLAN PH2 Al .0 S A 1 PH2 LEVEL ELI 1/16-i'-0' Central Park West Phase 1&2 DLC Kimley4ftrn FINAL PUD February 2,20 1 5 ORIGINAL155UE: a -1—s Na. D.—ipti— Date 214521 1-- —1. ESG_ E5G_ Central Park West Ph— 1&2 PH2 LEVEL I PLAN PH2 Al .1 4 4�) LEVEL' Central Park West Phase 1 &2 DLC R-d—U.1 FINAL PUD February 2, 201 5 ORIGINAL 155UE: REVISIONS ... D—IiplDate — 2 14521 ESG_ E5G_ Central Park West Phase 162 PH2 - LEVEL 2 PLAN PH2 Al .2 � Q LEL 3 (4-5 SIR ,, — m Central Park West Phase 1 &2 DLC Residential o 0 FINAL PUD February 2, 201 5 ORIGINAL ISSUE: az iozi�s REVISIONS No. D—lip-1 D- 214521 ESG_ ESG_ Central Park West Phase 1&2 PH2 LEVEL 3-5 PLAN PH2 Al .3 Aa II----------------- T�'- L Eel Central Park West Phase 1&2 DEC Residential DLC rjmley*Horn ­harchueers — m in neap oils m ae 55 p. 5 1 2 3 3 9 S 5 0 Is 1.1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 1 www R S Is h FINAL PUD February 2, 201 5 ORIGINALISSUE: pzipziis REVISIONS ... D—rlpt— Date 214521 ESG_ ESG_ Central Park W est Phase 162 PH2 LEVEL 5PLAN PH2 Al .4 KEY PLAN J EXTERIOR MATERIAL KEYNOTES - PHASE It to -2 OR CI( COLORRt 1&2 :RICK COLOR R2 2A-2 STONE COLOR 11 28-2 STONE ORCASTSTONE:ASE SA -2 PREFIN SHED METAL PANEL COLOR RI 5:-Y PREF N SXED METAL PANEL COLOR A2 02 5PREF N SXED METAL CORNICE COLOR tl2 562 PRE FINISHED METAL CANOPY COLOR CS 5E-2 PREENS%EDMETALSPANDRE✓THANSOMPANEL-DOLOHRI SA -2 COMPOSTEWNDOWS RA -2 DECOMTVE MECXANICAL GP -E 1:X2 —NUM AND GLASS BALCONY 11X2 PREENI SHED AWMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM 12X2 METAL RAILING SYSTEM PHASE Z. SOUTH EU -VAT" 14ww Sy.k Cop I M - ,.pde ER% Cha IX,ezxcx.A:.. x.xg¢ OdY PHASE 2- WEST ELEVATION O SraTk, &.RFAC£ AREA 45,LAd 4G. Et O O © © O © O O a • -- yrf t ILL LLs� • • \ z s- 2 PH2 - SOUTH ELEVATION zA: aGz•-nrc I minit LEVEL 1 fl 1 I �eveL P 1 i1 PH2 - WEST —LEVEL 1 100'-O LEVELPI Central Park West Phase 1&2 DLC R-deptlal DLC Kimley3»Horn esc FINAL PUD February 2, 201 5 ORIGINALISSUE: pz-11 REVISIONS No. D-11pt- Date 214521 ESO ESO Central Park West Phase 162 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS PH2 A3.1 I KEY PLAN EXTERIOR MATERIAL KEYNOTES - PHASE II 1A-2 BRIM - COLOR et 1&2 BRICK -COLOR. ?A-2 STONE COLORat 28-2 STONE OR UST STONE SASE SA -2 PREFINISHEDMETALPANEL DOLOR AI W2 PRE FINISHED METAL PANEL- COLOR M SC -2 PREFIN'SHED METAL CORNICE - COLOR a2 SD -2 PRE FINISHED METAL CANOPY -COLOR. SE -2 'REFINISHED METAL SPANDREL/TRANSOM PANEL -COLOR 11 BM2 CDMPOSITE WINDOWS SA4 DEOORATIVE MECHANICAL GRILLE 10h2 ALUM INUM AND GUSS BALCONY 11A-2 'REFINISHED ALUMINIM STOREFRONT SYSTEM I_ METAL RAILING SYSTEM PNPSL 2-10001N ELEVAIWNmm....���. .... TOTAL SURFACE AREA CLuAt MitbwiC»R/age Qese O MawTn C4Ma w CYAs B MaLOripi Ctvmra>R `J fah KEY PLAN 2 PH2-NORTH ELEVATION z yaz•. ra 0A IIiEIE __ — �' I Ilia —Y "t g Pi IT _ _ROOF LEVEL b 61 4' _ LEVEL 5 190'-O _ LEVEL 4 196'-8 _ LEVEL9 137'-4 _ LEVEL2 116'-O I ROOF E — T _ EVELb bt A I j 'EVEL5 50 - O• — ,T— _ +_ F LEVE 9 — � 137'— 4• V I fVs F LEVELI _ �r Central Park West Phase 1&2 DLC 1esld-11.1 FINAL PUD February 2, 201 5 ORIGINALISSUE: pxlpxlls REVISIONS N.. Descrip Npn Oate 214521 ESG ESG Central Park West Phase 1&2 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS PH2 A3.2 PHASE 2, EAST EIEVATKK/ ?OTAL T,S55d4+O5i T£$4AfAGE ANSA 247c5q Ft CIRIaIMptnYwtC .raBv ENlCSL cwaaMatnt{MWz Av 32% O.F. axr,Ar sxeeage QK Central Park West Phase 1&2 DLC 1esld-11.1 FINAL PUD February 2, 201 5 ORIGINALISSUE: pxlpxlls REVISIONS N.. Descrip Npn Oate 214521 ESG ESG Central Park West Phase 1&2 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS PH2 A3.2 LEVELb ' LLJ _ _. LL'+_ii. LL -A-- _ A -_L _ _ tAt- _LJF L.L 1 L..LJra Li,..i,J _ ME ,s ALJ - 9L -JJ LLJ _ _. LL'+_ii. LL -A-- _ A -_L _ _ tAt- _LJF L.L 1 L..LJra Li,..i,J _ ME WOO'N8OH—A33WU1'M g mz/Z0/Zo"" v4e* In _ L6 L4—Sb9—LS9 :3NOHdO O W -r— 4lLSS NW'lf1Vd'15 SgLgti AB 03N33H] TdIlN30IS38 014 o Z o N9EZ 31105 '153M 3ntl AlISi13nIN0 OSSZ a39WON 3SN3ON NW Ste- 1181 HX3 J N I N �1 fl1 Ae WV60 NW `1k3llVA N3a10`9N> ]Vd sinm 1S <0 C,) w 'In x uaoH <<�CaIWi� ]Wd SVOM M A9 03NDIS30 iiomi 39VMJd9 1SAAA NaVd Wt :UN30 N a O = W 0 ■ :d33NION3 NDIS30 31VOS IwIM .cy u.Naeov. vuv a?u.=I,ovwo qui!. >M'•wo�w .w> =Ir. ,.ao,a.,I v.. io . .wa...{ .o. a -1. ,. ..vasa U B � o w LL C7 z,,mwn•l 4• Lc7 N ' 4 -a - C= m W LU LL. m r) r, u 00-0 m00 c0M � N F— C) Q Y L U < J Q > us O o 0 o a U�-iU) X: I — I Y M N WOO'N8OH—A33WU1'M g mz/Z0/Zo"" v4e* In _ L6 L4—Sb9—LS9 :3NOHdO O W -r— 4lLSS NW'lf1Vd'15 SgLgti AB 03N33H] TdIlN30IS38 014 o Z o N9EZ 31105 '153M 3ntl AlISi13nIN0 OSSZ a39WON 3SN3ON NW Ste- 1181 HX3 J N I N �1 fl1 Ae WV60 NW `1k3llVA N3a10`9N> ]Vd sinm 1S <0 C,) w 'In x uaoH <<�CaIWi� ]Wd SVOM M A9 03NDIS30 iiomi 39VMJd9 1SAAA NaVd Wt :UN30 N a O = W 0 ■ :d33NION3 NDIS30 31VOS IwIM .cy u.Naeov. vuv a?u.=I,ovwo qui!. >M'•wo�w .w> =Ir. ,.ao,a.,I v.. io . .wa...{ .o. a -1. ,. ..vasa U B � o w LL C7 z,,mwn•l 4• Lc7 N ' 4 -a - C= m W LU LL. m r) r, u 00-0 m00 c0M � N F— C) Q Y L U < J Q > us O o 0 o a U�-iU) X: I — I Y U7 iv ice, -I� X 1 I4i� ❑ m ❑ M E `= C jun b b Vu - Its I 1 I -F I i `-'--------------- /`--- \---------/ __ s® L tl pvo v+o .... R ......i" a wl�.. I�ovli. iv .iv> Q m U W Z _ W J ao V � N 0_ � O f 1 t 00 0 0 0 OH 11 0 0 w J Q �+ C t s Y W ]{] 0 cn°r-' 3 — ° in J o +otl.+tl c -IV. eVl +W RNa 7 -61c. Y6oj ryas LL IC7 2 — IY NDO'N210H-A3lNIN'MMM L6-9V9-t993NOHd "L99 NN 'InVd '1S N8£Z 3LI05 '153M 3ntl AlISi13AIN0 OS9Z U.IDH �i(����f� � S loZ/ao/ao "" 5S/9� 2139Nf1N 3SN3�f1 NN �''�4/i"— AB 03NO3H0 1181 HX3 J N I N �1 fll S1 18 sn IVUN301S32i 014 NW 'rl3llt/n N34lOJ/>i2itld Slf101 '1S 1S3M �I Vd 1�WHiN3O to p N �� oN \ o 0 3 O w auj � m N z X w S,w-- A8 NMYaa 3NAVd 'D StlOf l �d33NI0N3 NOIS30 MA9 03NOIS30 3ltl OS U7 iv ice, -I� X 1 I4i� ❑ m ❑ M E `= C jun b b Vu - Its I 1 I -F I i `-'--------------- /`--- \---------/ __ s® L tl pvo v+o .... R ......i" a wl�.. I�ovli. iv .iv> Q m U W Z _ W J ao V � N 0_ � O f 1 t 00 0 0 0 OH 11 0 0 w J Q �+ C t s Y W ]{] 0 cn°r-' 3 — ° in J o +otl.+tl c -IV. eVl +W RNa 7 -61c. Y6oj ryas LL IC7 2 — IY ------------ L_--_—_---_1 ED ❑ I �; EL 0 T� ❑ m " m 02 CENTRAL PARK WEST FIRE TRUCK SCALE DESIGN ENGINEER LUCAS C. PAYNE Kimley>>> Horn DESIGNED BY %< z �� ST. LOUIS PARK/GOLDEN VALLEY, MN DRAWN BY W 00 , DLC RESIDENTIAL TURNING EXHIBIT MN CEN NB BEcJR 2550 UNIVERSITY m z1 O O CP CHECKED BYES 46785 AVE WEST, SUITE 238N ST. PAUL, AN 55114 --WDMO2/O�/LO.� 5 PHONE: 651-645-4197 DATE: WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM N A FT 0) 00 °O° --T—% I M -#a �47' DQ - L -------------- — -------- LL II L u ck L u It cl c C LL 2 S; V LL C Y f 14 4 UTILITIES: Century Link: 6244 Cedar Ave S. Richfield, MN 55423 Phone: (651) 312.5421 Contact: Justin Johnson Center Point Energy. 700 Linden Ave W. PO Box 1165 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Phone: (612) 321.5426 Contact: Andrew Balgobin Xcel Energy. 1518 Chestnut Ave N.—First Floor Minneapolis, MN 55403 Phone: (612) 630.4549 Contact: Kevin Jones (kevin.m. Ion es®xcelen ergy.com) Comcast Cable: 9705 Data Park Minnetonka, MN 55343 Phone: (651) 493.5303 Contacts: Duane Carlson Time Warner Telecom: 5480 Feltl Rd. Minnetonka, MN 55343 Phone: (952) 351.2353 — Office (612) 805.6827 — Mobile Contact: Bob Strong (bob.strong®twtelecom.com) CONSTRUCTION PLANS FOR CENTRAL PARK WEST ST LOUIS PARK/GOLDEN VALLEY, MINNESOTA CONTACTS: Developer/Owner: DLC Residential, LLC 5245 Wayzata Blvd. St Louis Pork, MN 55416 Phone: (612) 325.9767 Contact: Rich Kauffman Civil Engineering Consultant: Kimley—Horn 2550 University Avenue West, Suite 238N St. Paul, MN 55114 Phone: (651) 645.4197 Contact: Lucas C. Payne. PE Municipality. City of Saint Louis Park 5005 Minnetonka Boulevard St. Louis Park, MN 55416 Phone: (952) 924.2574 (952) 924.2687 Contact: Sean Walther, Senior Planner Scott Brink, City Engineer PREPARED FOR: r -C I - FEB 0 4 2015 DLC RESIDENTIALF e, INDEX OF SHEETS City of Golden Valley 7800 Golden Valley Road Golden Valley, MN 55427 Phone: (763) 893.8000 RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: ---_____ DATE: Contact: Jeff Oliver, City Engineer CITY ENGINEER, CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: --- _ ----- _ ___—_—_ DATE: CITY ENGINEER, CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK 6010 TITLE SHEET 6020 SWPPP NOTES 6021 PHASE 1 EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN 6022 PHASE 2 EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN 6023 SCHEDULE, INFORMATION AND SUMMARY TABLES 6024 EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL DETAILS 6025 EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL DETAILS 6030 EXISTING CONDITIONS & REMOVALS PLAN 6040 OVERALL SITE PLAN 6041 SITE PLAN (PHASE 1) 6042 SITE PLAN DETAILS 6043 SITE PLAN DETAILS 6044 SITE PLAN DETAILS 6050 OVERALL GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN 6051 GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN (PHASE 1) 6052 GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN DETAILS 6053 GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN DETAILS 6054 GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN DETAILS 6060 OVERALL UTILITY PLAN 6061 UTILITY PLAN (PHASE 1) 6062 UTILITY PLAN DETAILS 6080 OVERALL LIGHTING PLAN 6081 LIGHTING PLAN (PHASE 1) 6082 LIGHTING DETAILS 6100 OVERALL LANDSCAPE PLAN 6101 LANDSCAPE PLAN (PHASE 1) 6102 LANDSCAPE DETAILS 6103 LANDSCAPE PRESERVATION PLAN 6104 TREE INVENTORY 6105 PARK AND WOONERF PLAN ALERT TO CONTRACTOR: 1. THE PRESENCE OF GROUNDWATER SHOULD BE ANTICIPATED ON THIS PROJECT CONTRACTOR'S BID SHALL INCLUDE CONSIDERATION FOR THIS ISSUE. WHEN PERFORMING GRADING OPERATIONS DURING PERIODS OF WET WEATHER, PROVIDE ADEQUATE DEWATERING, DRAINAGEAND GROUND ALL CONTRACTORS MUST CONTACT WATER MANAGEMENT TO CONTROL MOISTURE OF SOILS. REFERTOMASTERSITESPECIFICATIONS. RK TO BE RK FINAL ND FINAL GOPHER STATE CALL ONE 2 GRADINERALCOMILETORWOTEINPRJECTDOCU(EARNMOr-OTARATOBES,PrFREEO GRATINGL BY THE MILESTONE DATE IN PROJECT DOCUMESTONE DATE MR TTO BE KEPT FREE RA MN TOLL FREE 1-800-252-1166 JOB TRAILERS AND STORAGE AFTER THE CONTRACT MILESTONE GATE FOR THE OUTLOT.GENERAL BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE CLE AR ACCESS FOR OUTLOT CONTRACTOR TO THE SPECIFIC PARCELAT TWIN CITY AREA 651-454-0002 ALL TIMES AFTER MILESTONE DATE. PURCHASER OF OUTLOTTO PROVIDE PERMIT DOCUMENTSAND 00 SWPPP REQUIRED BY STATE/LOCAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SPECIRC OUTLOT. W W W J Z } W J � J Q W i J W Q Y Z Q O W d (-0Q aa. U W fn U � O J H U) DATE 02/02/2015 PROJECT N0. 160755001 SHEET NUMBER 6010 Y P_CKICOAI KI/ITCC A. PROJECT OFFICE WALL SWPPP POSTINGS: THE FOLLOWING ITEMS MUST BE POSTED TOGETHER IN A SINGLE, ORGANIZED LOCATION ON A WALL INSIDE THE PROJECT OFFICE: 1) SWPPP SITE MAPS (ALL PHASES); 2) SWPPP DETAIL SHEETS; 3) MAP SHOWING LOCATION OF OFFSITE IMPORT OR EXPORT FACILITY; 4) REVISIONS TO DETAILS, SITE MAPS, OR SWPPP-RELATED RFIS; 5) SITE SWPPP BINDER; 6) SWOT PLACARD; 7) CURRENT OWNER STORMWATER COMPLIANCE TRAINING CERTIFICATES FOR SUPERINTENDENT(S) AND COMPLIANCE OFFICER(S); AND 8) CERTIFICATIONS AND/OR TRAINING CERTIFICATES REQUIRED TO PERFORM INSPECTIONS BY THE APPLICABLE CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PERMIT OR AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION. B. PERMITTED PROJECT AREA: FOR PURPOSES OF THIS SWPPP AND ASSOCIATED STORMWATER PERMIT, 'PERMITTED PROJECT AREA' IS DEFINED AS ANY AND ALL AREAS WITHIN THE PROJECT LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE, AS SHOWN ON THE SWPPP SITE MAPS AND IDENTIFIED IN THE NOTICE OF INTENT TO THE AGENCY. ALL GROUND -DISTURBING AND CONSTRUCTION -RELATED ACTIVITIES (MATERIAL STORAGE, DUMPSTERS, PARKING AREAS, PROJECT OFFICE TRAILER ETC.) MUST BE INCLUDED WITHIN THE PERMITTED PROJECT AREA LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE. OFFSITE AREA(S) TO BE DISTURBED AS PART OF THIS PROJECT (NOT ON OWNER PROPERTY): WORK ASSOCIATED WITH UTICA AVENUE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS. Y ALL AREAS OUTSIDE THE PERMITTED PROJECT AREA (LE., LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE) ACQUIRED FOR USE BY THE GC OR A SUBCONTRACTOR OF THE GC (BORROW SOURCES, DISPOSAL AREAS, ETC.) MUST BE MANAGED IN a ACCORDANCE WITH APPENDIX E - TAB 21 OF THE 02370 SPECIFICATION. THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO LOCATE OFFICE TRAILERS AND MATERIAL 8 STORAGE AREAS FOR THE PROJECT WITHIN THE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE. THE CONTRACTOR MAY REQUEST USE OF OFF-SITE LOCATIONS FOR OFFICE TRAILERS OR NON -ERODIBLE MATERIAL STORAGE; HOWEVER, APPROVAL MUST BE OBTAINED FROM THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER THE CEC AND THE WAL-MART SWCT PRIOR TO THEIR USE. REQUESTS WILL BE REVIEWED ON A CASE BY CASE BASIS AND IF APPROVED, LIMITATIONS ON USE WILL BE PROVIDED BY THE CEC. _ C. SPECIAL PROJECT AREAS: THERE ARE NO SPECIAL PROJECTS, LOCATED BEYOND THE OWNER PERMITTED PROJECT AREA, REQUIRING INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE ASSOCIATED WITH THIS CONSTRUCTION PROJECT. S - D.1 NON-STORMWATER DISCHARGES: THE GENERAL PERMIT FOR STORMWATER DISCHARGES ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES PROHIBITS MOST NON-STORMWATER _ DISCHARGES DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE. ALLOWABLE NON-STORMWATER DISCHARGES THAT OCCUR DURING CONSTRUCTION ON THIS PROJECT, ARE INCLUDED IN THE SECTION 5.2 OF THE GENERAL PERMIT. 9 BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMPS) MUST BE IMPLEMENTED FOR THE GENERAL PERMIT ALLOWABLE DISCHARGES FOR THE DURATION OF THE Z PERMIT. THE TECHNIQUES DESCRIBED IN THIS SWPPP FOCUS ON PROVIDING CONTROL OF POLLUTANT DISCHARGES WITH PRACTICAL APPROACHES THAT UTILIZE READILY AVAILABLE EXPERTISE, MATERIAL, AND EQUIPMENT. NON-STORMWATER COMPONENTS OF SITE DISCHARGES MUST BE UNCONTAMINATED NON -TURBID WATER ALL NON-STORMWATER DISCHARGES MUST BE ROUTED TO A STORMWATER CONTROL PRIOR TO _ DISCHARGE. WATER USED FOR CONSTRUCTION WHICH DISCHARGES FROM THE SITE MUST ORIGINATE FROM A PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY OR PRIVATE WELL APPROVED BY THE STATE HEALTH DEPARTMENT. WATER USED FOR R CONSTRUCTION THAT DOES NOT ORIGINATE FROM AN APPROVED PUBLIC SUPPLY MUST NOT DISCHARGE FROM THE SITE; IT CAN BE RETAINED IN RETENTION PONDS UNTIL IT INFILTRATES OR EVAPORATES. WHEN NON-STORMWATER IS DISCHARGED FROM THE SITE, IT MUST BE DONE IN A MANNER SUCH THAT IT DOES NOT CAUSE EROSION OF THE SOIL DURING DISCHARGE. D.2 POWER WASHING: - PROCESS WATER SUCH AS POWER WASHING WATER AND CONCRETE CUTTING EFFLUENT, AMONG OTHERS, MUST BE COLLECTED FOR TREATMENT AND _ DISPOSAL. IT MUST NOT BE FLUSHED INTO THE SITE STORM DRAIN SYSTEM OR DISCHARGED OFF-SITE. D. DISCHARGE POINTS: ALL DISCHARGE POINTS MUST BE INSPECTED TO DETERMINE WHETHER EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES ARE EFFECTIVE IN PREVENTING DISCHARGE OF SEDIMENT FROM THE SITE AND/OR IMPACTS TO RECEIVING WATERS. SEDIMENT ACCUMULATION DOWNGRADIENT OF DISCHARGE LOCATIONS SHALL BE REPORTED AS A SEDIMENT DISCHARGE (SEE APPENDIX E - TAB 14, SEDIMENT RELEASES, OF THE 02370 SPECIFICATION) AND THE POTENTIAL UPSTREAM CAUSE SHALL BE INVESTIGATED TO PREVENT FUTURE OCCURRENCE. CONTACT THE CM, CEC AND SWCT TO DETERMINE APPROPRIATE ACTION FOR CLEANUP OF DISCHARGED SEDIMENT _ THAT MAY BE OUTSIDE OF THE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE. SEE SAMPLING AND MONITORING OF EFFLUENT PLAN OF APPLICABLE). EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES A. CONTRACTOR SHALL IMPLEMENT BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES AS REQUIRED BY THIS STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN. ADDITIONAL BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED AS DICTATED BY CONDITIONS AT NO ADDITIONAL COST OF OWNER THROUGHOUT ALL PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION. B. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP'S) AND CONTROLS SHALL CONFORM TO FEDERAL, STATE, OR LOCAL REQUIREMENTS OR MANUAL OF PRACTICE, AS APPLICABLE. CONTRACTOR SHALL IMPLEMENT ADDITIONAL CONTROLS AS DIRECTED BY PERMITTING AGENCY OR OWNER C. SITE MAP MUST CLEARLY DELINEATE ALL STATE WATERS. PERMITS FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IMPACTING STATE WATERS OR REGULATED WETLANDS MUST BE MAINTAINED ON SITE AT ALL TIMES. D. CONTRACTOR TO LIMIT DISTURBANCE OF SITE IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH SWPPP IMPLEMENTATION SEQUENCE, OR AS REQUIRED BY THE APPLICABLE GENERAL PERMIT. NO UNNECESSARY OR IMPROPERLY SEQUENCED CLEARING AND/OR GRADING SHALL BE PERMITTED. E. ALL DENUDED/BARE AREAS THAT WILL BE INACTIVE FOR 14 DAYS OR MORE, MUST BE STABILIZED IMMEDIATELY UPON COMPLETION OF MOST RECENT GRADING ACTIVITY, WITH THE USE OF FAST -GERMINATING ANNUAL GRASS/GRAIN VARIETIES, STRAW/HAY MULCH, WOOD CELLULOSE FIBERS, TACKIFIERS, NETTING AND/OR BLANKETS. COMPLETION MUST BE ACHIEVED WITHIN 14 DAYS. F. DISTURBED PORTIONS OF THE SITE WHERE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HAS PERMANENTLY STOPPED SHALL BE PERMANENTLY STABILIZED AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. THESE AREAS SHALL BE SEEDED, SODDED, AND/OR VEGETATED IMMEDIATELY, AND COMPLETED NO LATER THAN 14 DAYS AFTER THE LAST CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY OCCURRING IN THESE AREAS. REFER TO THE GRADING PLAN AND/OR LANDSCAPE PLAN. G. SLOPES SHALL BE LEFT IN A ROUGHENED CONDITION DURING THE GRADING PHASE TO REDUCE RUNOFF VELOCITIES AND EROSION. TEMPORARY AND/OR PERMANENT STABILIZATION SHALL BE APPLIED PER REQUIREMENTS IN THESE E&S CONTROL NOTES. H. DUE TO THE GRADE CHANGES DURING THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROJECT, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ADJUSTING THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES (SILT FENCES, ETC.) TO PREVENT EROSION AND POLLUTANT DISCHARGE OFF-SITE. 1, ALL MEASURES STATED ON THIS SITE MAP, AND IN THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN, SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN FULLY FUNCTIONAL CONDITION UNTIL NO LONGER REQUIRED FOR A COMPLETED PHASE OF WORK OR FINAL STABILIZATION OF THE SITE. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE CHECKED BY A QUALIFIED PERSON IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS OR THE APPLICABLE PERMIT, WHICHEVER IS MORE STRINGENT, AND REPAIRED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SITE PLANS. 1, STORM WATER POLLUTANT CONTROL MEASURES INSTALLED DURING CONSTRUCTION, THAT WILL ALSO PROVIDE STORM WATER MANAGEMENT AFTER CONSTRUCTION, ARE INCLUDED IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. THE SITE-SPECIFIC POST CONSTRUCTION STORM WATER OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE (O&M) MANUAL IS INCLUDED IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. K. ALL PERMANENT CONTROLS AND SYSTEMS MUST BE INSTALLED AND FUNCTIONING AS DESIGNED AND FREE OF ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT AND DEBRIS DURING FINAL PROJECT INSPECTION AND APPROVAL. HAZARDOUS MATERIAL MANAGEMENT & SPILL REPORTING ANY HAZARDOUS OR POTENTIALLY HAZARDOUS MATERIAL THAT IS BROUGHT ONTO THE CONSTRUCTION SITE SHALL BE HANDLED PROPERLY TO REDUCE THE POTENTIAL FOR STORMWATER POLLUTION. ALL MATERIALS USED ON THIS CONSTRUCTION SITE SHALL BE PROPERLY STORED, HANDLED, DISPENSED AND DISPOSED OF FOLLOWING ALL APPLICABLE LABEL DIRECTIONS. FLAMMABLE AND COMBUSTIBLE LIQUIDS SHALL BE STORED AND HANDLED ACCORDING TO APPLICABLE REGULATIONS, AND, AT A MINIMUM, ACCORDING TO 29 CFR 1926.152, ONLY APPROVED CONTAINERS AND PORTABLE TANKS SHALL BE USED FOR STORAGE AND HANDLING OF FLAMMABLE AND COMBUSTIBLE LIQUIDS, MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEETS (MSDS) INFORMATION SHALL BE KEPT ON SITE FOR ANY AND ALL APPLICABLE MATERIALS. HOWEVER, MSDS MAY ALSO BE ACCESSED VIA TELEPHONE OR OTHER ELECTRONIC MEANS OR APPARATUS. IN THE EVENT OF AN ACCIDENTAL SPILL, IMMEDIATE ACTION SHALL BE TAKEN BY THE GC TO CONTAIN AND REMOVE THE SPILLED MATERIAL. THE SPILL SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE APPROPRIATE AGENCIES IN THE REQUIRED TIME FRAMES. AS REQUIRED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT. ANY SPILL OR DISCHARGE ENTERING WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES SHALL BE PROPERLY REPORTED. ALL HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, INCLUDING CONTAMINATED SOIL AND LIQUID CONCRETE WASTE, SHALL BE DISPOSED OF BY THE CONTRACTOR IN THE MANNER SPECIFIED BY FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS AND BY THE MANUFACTURER OF SUCH PRODUCTS. THE GC SHALL PREPARE A WRITTEN RECORD OF ANY SPILL AND ASSOCIATED CLEAN-UP ACTIVITIES OF PETROLEUM PRODUCTS OR HAZARDOUS MATERIALS IN EXCESS OF l GALLON OR REPORTABLE QUANTITIES, WHICHEVER IS LESS, ON THE DAY OF THE SPILL. THE GC SHALL PROVIDE NOTICE TO OWNER, VIA THE ONLINE CRITICAL INCIDENT REPORT, IMMEDIATELY UPON IDENTIFICATION OF ANY SPILL SPILL REPORT FORMS ARE AVAILABLE IN THE ONLINE SWPPP REPORTING SYSTEM PROVIDED BY THE OWNER COPIES OF SPILL CRITICAL INCIDENT REPORTS SHALL BE PRINTED AND MAINTAINED IN THE JOBSITE BINDER- ANY INDERANY SPILLS OF PETROLEUM PRODUCTS OR HAZARDOUS MATERIALS IN EXCESS OF REPORTABLE QUANTITIES AS DEFINED BY EPA OR THE STATE OR LOCAL AGENCY REGULATIONS, SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY REPORTED TO THE EPA NATIONAL RESPONSE CENTER (1-800-424-8802) AND THE WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES (1-800-943-0003) THE STATE REQUIRES REPORTING WHEN: • THERE IS AN IMPACT TO HUMAN HEALTH • THERE IS AN IMPACT TO THE ENVIRONMENT • THERE IS A FIRE, EXPLOSION, OR SAFETY HAZARD • A SPILL S O I NOT IMMEDIATELY CLEANED UP • THE SPILL WAS MORE THAN THE REPORTABLE QUANTITY OF I GALLON OF A PETROLEUM PRODUCT THE REPORT SHOULD BE FILED WITH THE STATE OF WISCONSIN IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER NR 706 OF THE WISCONSIN ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. ALL REPORTS SHOULD BE FILED WITHIN 24 HOURS OF A SPILL OCCURRING. THE REPORTABLE QUANTITY FOR HAZARDOUS MATERIALS CAN BE FOUND IN 40 CFR 302 AND THE US EPA WEBSITE: HTTP://WWW.EPA.GOV/SUPERFUND/POLICY/RELEASEIRG, AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RULES OF SOUTH DAKOTA (ARSD) 74.34:01:03, HTTP: //LEGIS. STATE. SD.US/RULES/INDEX TO MINIMIZE THE POTENTIAL FOR A SPILL OF PETROLEUM PRODUCT OR HAZARDOUS MATERIALS TO COME IN CONTACT WITH STORMINATER, THE FOLLOWING STEPS SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED: I) ALL MATERIALS WITH HAZARDOUS PROPERTIES, SUCH AS PESTICIDES, PETROLEUM PRODUCTS, FERTILIZERS, SOAPS, DETERGENTS, CONSTRUCTION CHEMICALS, ACIDS, BASES, PAINTS, PAINT SOLVENTS, ADDITIVES FOR SOD. STABILIZATION, CONCRETE, CURING COMPOUNDS AND ADDITIVES, ETC., SHALL BE STORED IN A SECURE LOCATION, UNDER COVER AND IN APPROPRIATE, TIGHTLY SEALED CONTAINERS WHEN NOT IN USE. 2)THE MINIMUM PRACTICAL QUANTITY OF ALL SUCH MATERIALS SHALL BE KEPT ON THE JOB SITE AND SCHEDULED FOR DELIVERY AS CLOSE TO TIME OF USE AS PRACTICAL. 3)A SPILL CONTROL AND CONTAINMENT KIT (CONTAINING FOR EXAMPLE, ABSORBENT MATERIAL SUCH AS KITTY LITTER OR SAWDUST, ACID, BASE, NEUTRALIZING AGENT, BROOMS, DUST PANS, MOPS, RAGS, GLOVES, GOGGLES, PLASTIC AND METAL TRASH CONTAINERS, ETC) SHALL BE PROVIDED AT THE CONSTRUCTION SITE AND ITS LOCATION(S) SHALL BE IDENTIFIED WITH LEGIBLE SIGNAGE AND SHOWN ON SITE MAPS. a. THE SPILL CONTROL AND CONTAINMENT KIT SUPPLIES SHALL BE OF SUFFICIENT QUANTITIES AND APPROPRIATE CONTENT TO CONTAIN A SPILL FROM THE LARGEST ANTICIPATED PIECE OF EQUIPMENT AND FROM THE LARGEST ANTICIPATED QUANTITIES OF PRODUCTS STORED ON THE SITE AT ANY GIVEN TIME. b. CONTENTS SHALL BE INSPECTED DAILY DURING THE DAILY STORMWATER INSPECTION. 4)ALL PRODUCTS SHALL BE STORED IN AND USED FROM THE ORIGINAL CONTAINER WITH THE ORIGINAL PRODUCT LABEL. CONTAINERS MUST BE STORED IN A MANNER TO PROTECT THEM FROM THE ELEMENTS AND INCIDENTAL DAMAGE. 5) ALL PRODUCTS SHALL BE USED IN STRICT COMPLIANCE WITH INSTRUCTIONS ON THE PRODUCT LABEL. 6)THE DISPOSAL OF EXCESS OR USED PRODUCTS SHALL BE IN STRICT COMPLIANCE WITH INSTRUCTIONS ON THE PRODUCT LABEL AND REGULATIONS. e ITC USGS QUADRANGLE MAP SITE x "g�Jf /T SI. CIRCLE OOVN —S�\ JR y, j = 0v�X � LILAC LE�Ni ROPN IXE >9f Ig ala it w / GMJW t;l bRER LA CIN. _1 P' LOU S. HI<<ln 1¢ nFORESr<9 A���e� $ o y3r• �xy� cL,lyltV� O°1 R➢. � f?b Ird ST. u • S• F STEPHEN a OR. ` h� N CE➢A-000 17 ➢. GTw BASSV00G R V' 2 SD GLENHURSi PL rA M. 25tH ST VICINITY MAP IMPORTANT: GC IS TO USE CRY OF GOLOEH VALLEY mENT6D:D TRUCE ROUTES GC TO USE THE SHORTEST ROUTE TO THE SITE FROM A CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY ­TRUUE—E. Z i LLJ J J U) Q 3: J Z Q Y Lu H QLLJ a O o cD YLu Z U LLJ (n p U 5 O J DATE 02/02/2015 PROJECT NO. 160755001 SHEET NUMBER 6020 1 Inls Document, together .1. the co p da 1l presentee nom. t. nereln as an na .— of sernce, r wee r. a w bI Inieneee only fir tM1a epeclt purpae r(I (N It p p atl Reuss of I{rn 11,111 on thls pac ment wH-1 w [an autnar zdj c aLoptatl Ey Klm ay-Rorn and naeoc ales. nc. ane pecn I a x o z _ — p N IIII / Ipi I ^77k �d 3w 3 7 o Z m A AO AZmf/J� mem m /r H II i a ry II II I N A u IIII n • II II B lid ry II% - z ry ❑ o v Z I m ry II% o m w �O y 0 - c " m Z m ox m 1. c po D D z o ° z ° z c� o - m un m o o m a yy pp I 2 Fi m F °Q y O m IS Le Z a m m 020:: m �� i HF OCIO . 2< mm °� m / / rT� D11p0, �;1 Is Oy ODN r^< yy (i o mi Z r po gop fo om A p pN J 2> <° �° m Nm010 ;l m H> ANF z �r i, ole �> Y 0 0 / m1O •m °r of s s Z C o -p8 m "D m & 0 y z rm m0 �� 8 2,02 � �F y og mo 4 /If '; , L C W D I z"1; ijf F Z a, p _p Vim° 1-1 iTm �. i.. n ��.....nnnnu mmo• wi O 1� 0 S5 g S v / / .d" uuuu�wwu.......lum......nn... .uu.........` �... •�� 9 11�m Pgm � y��D�m ymnm "HU ZPCZ mpmgmmO OZTO Zm°O Nm OG Oyo :m, � ~mO N /100 Z e2ogmP °�~° on�A.aao iAa � A A9°y20 ZPAi o°HOOm y�yo O gHoiy; mm�m TO og ogm2 °m oma M -fie ,M, R H lzm soy n V P611. I A < Y.a yy 3 x Zm NK /I n N a nc I a x o z n s� IIII � n Ik q N - 1 llOII®v II I 11 ryO III I i n n ° II ii 11 � IIID � n ii ill r. f' 11 p IIII � • ,II ca m I :L �a IIII • 1 � III 11111[[''1 I •.I Ill II I li 11 II I I I• • 11 IIII � 11 III I 11 III I ►.,� I n II I , . Ig, ON %I' I 0 . 1 ,.zm u D \ 111 II = 1 nmm 111 IIII • ...L_ VV I iii il� ' ��•�3���„ of � QsP$ m I 'I i y D I uII I m n « o n I r �D'i> v 3 >° d m I 7D V A < Y.a yy 3 x Zm NK /I n N a nc m mz a x o z _ — p N IIII <, ;uj y �d 3w 3 7 o Z m A AO AZmf/J� mem m N H II D Z a ry II II I N A u IIII n • II II B lid ry II% - z ry ry n• y Z 11 ry II% n s� IIII � n Ik q N - 1 llOII®v II I 11 ryO III I i n n ° II ii 11 � IIID � n ii ill r. f' 11 p IIII � • ,II ca m I :L �a IIII • 1 � III 11111[[''1 I •.I Ill II I li 11 II I I I• • 11 IIII � 11 III I 11 III I ►.,� I n II I , . Ig, ON %I' I 0 . 1 ,.zm u D \ 111 II = 1 nmm 111 IIII • ...L_ VV I iii il� ' ��•�3���„ of � QsP$ m I 'I i y D I uII I m n « o n I r �D'i> v 3 >° d m I 7D V 3 3; g m ' 1 Ip I A �a �mzIS� Zo,j2o A < Y.a yy 3 x Zm NK o m mz a x o z _ — O . _ m z. <, ;uj y �d 3w 3 7 o 3 3; g m ' 1 Ip I A �a �mzIS� Zo,j2o I. o A < x < x - o m mz a x o z _ — O . _ m z. <, ;uj y CHECKED BY WDM o Z m A AO AZmf/J� mem m Fo D Z a o 1001 Z 0 D N A TTI 0 DO ° o m m p C - z � z D y Z O rO o m w �O y 0 ? WN oma! re0 NNmz> m Z m ox m 1. c po D a ° - m un _ I. o A < x < x - o z a x o z _ — O . _ m z. ; m A y CHECKED BY WDM o Z m A AO P m Fo D Z O m Z 0 D N A � z y - z � z D y Z D C 1A ••' 1.' �— bl v I� ' — gTpm m IIs-� n: 9= m M m N c A 0 ' _ ° ul ul m (), -, � ZO f o N� �r� N o CENTRAL PARK WEST ST. LOUIS PARKIGOLDEN VALLEY, MN DLC RESIDENTIAL PHASE1 — EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN SCALE DESIGN ENGINEER LUCAS C. PAYNE Kimley>>> Horn 2550 UNIVERSITY AVE WEST, SUITE 238N ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE: 651—HORN.C97 WW'W.KIMLEY—HORN.COM DESIGNED BY BMW DRAWN BY MLS MN UCENSE NUMBER 46785 DATE:02 02 X2015 CHECKED BY WDM No. REVISIONS DATE 1 -........ ------ — r -- ■Ilal i FEE t `T T T �•El WIN, 11 AV -11' 882 � � � N �—, CE SS TS •' 4��sF ��c� <—LL------ ° loo SITE FEATURES �— CITYBOUNDARYLINE EROSION DETAILS EROSION NOTES E— — PROPERTY UNE SWPPP INFORM -ON SIGN ' — q ❑ a� 0 11..111111111..1111111 PROPOSED LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE - EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR o -- EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR ° IOXX PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR 9 TRUCKWELL DRAIN SEDIMENT FILTER 10XX PROPOSED MINORCONTOUR TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EXIT PROPOSED CURB 5 X.XX% DIRECTION OF OVERLAND 5 FLOW/SLOPEARROW p s PROPOSED STORM SEWER m EXISTING STORM SEWER E (DD EXISTING STORM SEWER STRUCTURE ., 2. ALLGENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED (EARTHWORK FINAL UTILITIES, AND FINAL TMESTIR WDATFSOFD.Hi.EI.HaNT MOFMUIUMNMN7i LhTASU SHALLBEDOCUM MBYMECONTRwc ONMESOLLO MONSEDPffMATION o CONTROL OPERATION Tms sclTnuLE ox SHEE[cu;3 JOB TRAILERS AND STORAGE AFTER THE CONTRACT MILESTONE DATE FOR THE OUTLQT. GENERAL D CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE CLEAR ACCESS FOR OUTLOT CONTRACTOR TO THE SPECIFIC PARCELAT � WIN, 11 AV -11' 882 � � � N �—, CE SS TS •' 4��sF ��c� <—LL------ ° loo SITE FEATURES �— CITYBOUNDARYLINE EROSION DETAILS EROSION NOTES E— — PROPERTY UNE SWPPP INFORM -ON SIGN ' — TEMPORARY GRADING EASEMENT ® IP2 0 11..111111111..1111111 PROPOSED LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE - EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR o -- EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR ° IOXX PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR 9 TRUCKWELL DRAIN SEDIMENT FILTER 10XX PROPOSED MINORCONTOUR TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EXIT PROPOSED CURB 5 X.XX% DIRECTION OF OVERLAND 5 FLOW/SLOPEARROW p s PROPOSED STORM SEWER m EXISTING STORM SEWER E (DD EXISTING STORM SEWER STRUCTURE wIRSLEtreMy NSEQUENCE, BEFORE THEHt II.7PLEMEMATIOx BEGWs. EROSION CONTROL NOTES 1, ALL PERIMETER SILT FENCE AND ROCK CONSTRUCTIONENTRANCESSHALLBE INSTALLED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 2, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE BASINS PRIOR TO SITE GRADING. 3, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL CATCH BASIN EROSION CONTROL MEASURES. 4, WI THIN TWO WEEKS OF SITE GRADING, ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE STABIUZED WITH SEED, SOD, OR ROCK BASE. REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR MATERIALS, S. ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE INSTALEDANDMAINTAINEDIN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY, AND WATERSHED DISTRICTPERMITS. 6, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ALL EROSION CONTROLMEASURES, INCLUDING THE REMOVAL OF SILT IN FRONT OF SILT FENCES DURING THE DURATION OFTHE CONSTRUCTION. T. ANY EXCESS SEDIMENT IN PROPOSED BASINS SHALLBE REMOVED BYTHE CONTRACTOR. S. REMOVAL ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AFTERVEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED. B. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL SOILS AND SEDIMENTTRACKEDONTO EXISTMG STREETS AND PAVEDARES. 10. IF BLOWING DUST BECOMES A NUISANCE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALLAPPLY WATER FROM A TANK TRUCK TO ALL CONSTRUCTION AREAS. 11. SWEEP ADJACENT STREET IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY REQUIREMENTS. T=Zzzv� SS SWPPP INFORM -ON SIGN IP1 ROAD DRAIN INLET PROTECTION ® IP2 GUTTER BUDDY CURB INLET PROTECTION oM E LSTURRWGGRA— OL OW nG THE c CENT AND 0. HJZE, THROUGHOUT CON9'RUCTIOV IMMEDIATELY F PLEIIgs OF THE MOST R TRMPaIARH.Y STAB O IPS FILTER SACK INLET SED NEW FILTER ® IP4 SILT FENCE INLET PROTECTION FORPAVING, PAVEASTE. E OPRIATEINLETPROTECTIONDEVICESFDRPAVEDAREASASWORKMMRMS PER& DUMM TD TRUCKWELL DRAIN SEDIMENT FILTER L'E TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EXIT INGtEKffORARYMOSIONANDffi�DIKffiN'TCONTROLBESTMANAGEM1 HtACHCE3(IR.BSI RR RIP RAP PAD 1. THE PRESENCE OF GROUNDWATER SHOULD BE ANTICIPATED ON THIS PROJECT. CONTRACTOR'S BID 1 TOHS). CONTILF —Y --IONS ANOTS UNt¢ THE CM FDIAL DALLY MSPECIION REPO READT tERhBNATE P6AMrt. Is SIGNED BY THE CONSTRUCRON S MANAGPRANn suBLRTTEo vIA TlT oorvLDNe Svwe REPORTIJc SYSTEM PROVmED BY THEowNFaT SHALL INCLUDE CONSIDERATION FOR THIS ISSUE. WHEN PERFORMINGGRADINGOPERATIONS DURING PERIODS OF WET WEATHER, PROVIDE ADEQUATE DEWATERING, DRAINAGEANOGROUND WATER MANAGEMENT TO CONTROL MOISTURE OF SOILS. REFER TO MASTER SITE SPECIFIG1nONS. ENLT F84CE ••IRI* _o aT9 SF IPI �.'• / i O SF 0 x of OD ALL CONTRACTORS MUST CONTACT !. GOPHER STATE CALL ONE GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET MN TOLL FREE 1-800-252-1166 0 25 50 100 OD BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS n. i. TWIN CITY AREA 651-454-0002 PS TEMP. SEEDING. SEEGRAC-- SWPPP IMPLEMENTATION SEQUENCE FOR LIMITS i. GRUBBING. AND STRIPPING THE SITE (PHA CL6ARPIG AND GRUBBWG TO THE EXTEM PRACTICAL TO MMIRBZE THE A— OF AREA DISNRB® AT PO PERMANENT SODDING INiINT� TME RUCI[ox of BNLDPGPAD AND RU NRFS oM E LSTURRWGGRA— OL OW nG THE c CENT AND 0. HJZE, THROUGHOUT CON9'RUCTIOV IMMEDIATELY F PLEIIgs OF THE MOST R TRMPaIARH.Y STAB O ABEDARERS, EKCMA. MATERIALSTOCKMLES THAT ARE SCHEDULED OR WKELY TOREMAW WACITVEFgt1RDAYSOR MORE MAERCRA ST—SAREAS TO BE VEGETATED AS THEY w11EeHWCMf ID FN'ALGRADE M PERMANENT MULCHING O RADIET MUCTURRS CURBSANDGUITER3. wsTALLI wAT ALL UC TURESAS STRUC REI AS INLET HssTALLED. Ln6TALLI AT ALL StORM SEW ER sIAUCNREs pS EACHHVLET SIRUCTIIRELSNSTALLED. FORPAVING, PAVEASTE. E OPRIATEINLETPROTECTIONDEVICESFDRPAVEDAREASASWORKMMRMS PER& DUMM EROSION CONTROLBIANKET RIS 9�n5, —AND -9 0NS MAY RE REMOVED AS UPSTREAM AREASRE4CHFHSALSTAIRMATIOIS. IFPERM WTSTA MAMNOVERALLAUE ,wCLUDWGOMLOTSAND & 1 CoxcURRENCBDWSFALLAn FROM THE OWNFA CONSTRUC110N MANAGER (CM) THAT THE SFTB AlHBEEN FULLY STABILIZED AND ALL CONSTRUCITON HAS BEEN COMPLETED. INGtEKffORARYMOSIONANDffi�DIKffiN'TCONTROLBESTMANAGEM1 HtACHCE3(IR.BSI ALERT TO CONTRACTOR: ® BT tHE REMOVAL OFTEM—TI[TENAND TO ---EO PRE -NOT SRLIJ'PPLDONANDREPOTS(ARKECMM 1. THE PRESENCE OF GROUNDWATER SHOULD BE ANTICIPATED ON THIS PROJECT. CONTRACTOR'S BID 1 TOHS). CONTILF —Y --IONS ANOTS UNt¢ THE CM FDIAL DALLY MSPECIION REPO READT tERhBNATE P6AMrt. Is SIGNED BY THE CONSTRUCRON S MANAGPRANn suBLRTTEo vIA TlT oorvLDNe Svwe REPORTIJc SYSTEM PROVmED BY THEowNFaT SHALL INCLUDE CONSIDERATION FOR THIS ISSUE. WHEN PERFORMINGGRADINGOPERATIONS DURING PERIODS OF WET WEATHER, PROVIDE ADEQUATE DEWATERING, DRAINAGEANOGROUND WATER MANAGEMENT TO CONTROL MOISTURE OF SOILS. REFER TO MASTER SITE SPECIFIG1nONS. NOTE: THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR MAY —FTE coxSTRUCDI-RELATED ACTIVITIES CONCURRHNTLY,o cBEtes AND STABIUZAnon Aarvrtms HAVE a'I'®' BRT_REt.ATED ST 6� w THE AEOVE SEQU6Nc6 ARE BOLDED FOR CLAMW. THE CW MUST APPROVE w W—G. ANY CEv:GPs w THE A —4- wIRSLEtreMy NSEQUENCE, BEFORE THEHt II.7PLEMEMATIOx BEGWs. 2. ALLGENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED (EARTHWORK FINAL UTILITIES, AND FINAL TMESTIR WDATFSOFD.Hi.EI.HaNT MOFMUIUMNMN7i LhTASU SHALLBEDOCUM MBYMECONTRwc ONMESOLLO MONSEDPffMATION GRADING) BY THE MILESTONE DATE IN PROJECT DOCUMENTS. ODUOTAREATO BE KEPT FREE Of CONTROL OPERATION Tms sclTnuLE ox SHEE[cu;3 JOB TRAILERS AND STORAGE AFTER THE CONTRACT MILESTONE DATE FOR THE OUTLQT. GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE CLEAR ACCESS FOR OUTLOT CONTRACTOR TO THE SPECIFIC PARCELAT ALL TIMES AFTER MILESTONE DATE. PURCHASER OF OUTLOTTO PROVIDE PERMITDOCUMENTS AND SWPPP REQUIRED BY STATE/LOCAL REQUIREMENTS FORSPECIFICOUTIOT. TIF O Z LLI LLI O LIJ N � � LLJ U) Z Q «s 0 2 U a_ z ILL J � J UJ Q UJ z Q Y 0 z QJ W d 0 NYNLu LL F- Q LC Z d J ILL! u) p U 5 0 J DATE 02/02/2015 PROJECT NO. 160755001 SHEET NUMBER 6022 ACREAGE SUMMARY (IN ACRES) I TOTAL PROPERTY AREA 13.50 = PERMITTED AREA WITHIN PROPERLY ].00 8 PERMITTED AREA OUTSIDE PROPERTY 2.50 / TOTAL PERMITTED PROIERARFA Hr+ r 9.50 8 IMPERVIOUS AREA BEFORE PROTECT Iw/in LOD) T.'�0 8 IMPERVIOUS AREA AT COMPIETIONIw/n LOD) 6.W ] PERVIOUS AREA AT COMPLETIONIw/n LOD) 3.50 SITE LOCATION SUMMARY ADDRESS: INTERSTATE 394 AND TRUNK HIGHWAY 100, ST. LOUIS PAflK&GOLDEN VALLEY, MN CENTER OF SrtE: LATDIAE 44'58'5.82"N LONGITUDE: 93' 20' 39.]8"W ADIACENT SURROUNDING PROPERTIES THE PflOPERTY IT ADIACFNT TO TW"M MAIOR RONDS;INTERSTATE 3940N THE NORTH, AND TRUNK HIGHWAY 100 TOTHE WEST. ADIACEMTO THE EAST AND SOUTH OF THE PROPERTY ARECOMMEflCMll BUILDINGS, MTD RESTAURANTS. SITE PRECIPITATION SUMMARY AVERAGE PRECIP. IN INCHES JAN 1.DM1 NUMBER: [N =8T 2.31 NAY 3.24 JUN 4.31 4.04 1.0T TEP 2.fi9 OCT 2.11 NOV 1.94 DEC 1.W THE TOTAL AVERAGE ANNUAL RAINFALL FOR THE PROIERAREA IS: 2S.41 INCHES THE DESIGN PAIN EVENT F00. THE PROTECTIS: ]ODVFPA RAIN EVENT THE TOPSOIL TYPICALLY CONSISTED OF SILTYSgNDTNATWAT MOBTgHD TYPICALLY VARIED IN THICKNESS FROM ABOUT0.4 T02 FEET IS TO ..I SOIL EROSION/SEDIMENTATION CONTROL OPERATION TIME SCHEDULE CORRESPONgNG TO ELEVATIONS VARYING FROM ABOUT 853 T086B. NOTE: GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO COMPLETE TABLE WITH THEIR ESTIMATED PROIECTSCHEDULE CONSTRUCTION SEOUENLE JAH FEB NAR P MA JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT T pEC All PER ARAPRMA JUN JUL AUG SEP OLTNO OEC E TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EXITS TEMPORARY CONTROL NEASUR S E SEDMEHT CONTROL BASINS TRAP 5 STNP & STOCKPILE i0Ps0 ROUGH GRADING _ STOPN 1ACII-1— STE CONSTRUCTION TINISH GRADING PERMANENT CO TR STRUCTURES ATON BUILDING CONSTRUCTION LANDSCAPING EED NAL STABILIZATION 1) CONTRACTOR MUST COMPLETE TABLE 'MTH ESDMATEO DATES OF PROJECT ACTIYTIES PROP TO BMP CERTIFICATION. Z) TIME SCHEWLE MUST COINCIDE NTH THE SWPPP INPLLMFHTATON SEQUENCE. O q U E n Y 0 3 6 RUNOFF COEFFICIENT SUMMARY E ry PRE-CONSTRUCTION CURVE NUMBER: Cry =92 i DOST-CONSTRUCTION CURVE Z �_ O unDO N Ca U Z N Q H U N IE NOTESMSE ANON: SOLS .—MASON IS FOR INFORMATION ONLY .1) SxgILD NOT BE USED 'Cl BOOING PUTdOTEs. CONSTRUCTOR _ O J w ESTIMATING. – Q m E 0 co Z LTJ Q J LLJ m Z _ O Ia- L1J Q U Q e Cn0� u- Z Cn s Z LLJ J E w � J Z Q LuZ Y z � J Q 0 w E J J) LLJ ~ Q U Z 0- J o U u 0 3 U) Da TE 0202/2015 PROJECT NO. 160755001 SHEE7 NUMBER E 6023 ACREAGE SUMMARY (IN ACRES) I TOTAL PROPERTY AREA 13.50 = PERMITTED AREA WITHIN PROPERLY ].00 8 PERMITTED AREA OUTSIDE PROPERTY 2.50 / TOTAL PERMITTED PROIERARFA Hr+ r 9.50 8 IMPERVIOUS AREA BEFORE PROTECT Iw/in LOD) T.'�0 8 IMPERVIOUS AREA AT COMPIETIONIw/n LOD) 6.W ] PERVIOUS AREA AT COMPLETIONIw/n LOD) 3.50 SITE LOCATION SUMMARY ADDRESS: INTERSTATE 394 AND TRUNK HIGHWAY 100, ST. LOUIS PAflK&GOLDEN VALLEY, MN CENTER OF SrtE: LATDIAE 44'58'5.82"N LONGITUDE: 93' 20' 39.]8"W ADIACENT SURROUNDING PROPERTIES THE PflOPERTY IT ADIACFNT TO TW"M MAIOR RONDS;INTERSTATE 3940N THE NORTH, AND TRUNK HIGHWAY 100 TOTHE WEST. ADIACEMTO THE EAST AND SOUTH OF THE PROPERTY ARECOMMEflCMll BUILDINGS, MTD RESTAURANTS. SITE PRECIPITATION SUMMARY AVERAGE PRECIP. IN INCHES JAN 1.DM1 NUMBER: [N =8T ACREAGE SUMMARY (IN ACRES) I TOTAL PROPERTY AREA 13.50 = PERMITTED AREA WITHIN PROPERLY ].00 8 PERMITTED AREA OUTSIDE PROPERTY 2.50 / TOTAL PERMITTED PROIERARFA Hr+ r 9.50 8 IMPERVIOUS AREA BEFORE PROTECT Iw/in LOD) T.'�0 8 IMPERVIOUS AREA AT COMPIETIONIw/n LOD) 6.W ] PERVIOUS AREA AT COMPLETIONIw/n LOD) 3.50 SITE LOCATION SUMMARY ADDRESS: INTERSTATE 394 AND TRUNK HIGHWAY 100, ST. LOUIS PAflK&GOLDEN VALLEY, MN CENTER OF SrtE: LATDIAE 44'58'5.82"N LONGITUDE: 93' 20' 39.]8"W ADIACENT SURROUNDING PROPERTIES THE PflOPERTY IT ADIACFNT TO TW"M MAIOR RONDS;INTERSTATE 3940N THE NORTH, AND TRUNK HIGHWAY 100 TOTHE WEST. ADIACEMTO THE EAST AND SOUTH OF THE PROPERTY ARECOMMEflCMll BUILDINGS, MTD RESTAURANTS. SITE PRECIPITATION SUMMARY AVERAGE PRECIP. IN INCHES JAN 1.DM1 FEB O.N MAR 1.86 2.31 NAY 3.24 JUN 4.31 4.04 1.0T TEP 2.fi9 OCT 2.11 NOV 1.94 DEC 1.W THE TOTAL AVERAGE ANNUAL RAINFALL FOR THE PROIERAREA IS: 2S.41 INCHES THE DESIGN PAIN EVENT F00. THE PROTECTIS: ]ODVFPA RAIN EVENT SITE TOPOGRAPHY SUMMARY LOWEST ELEVATION OF PROJECT SIZE: APPRO%IMATELY 879.0) (EXISTING TINE) HIGHEST ELEVATION OF %IOIECTSrtE: APPROXIMATELY 890.00IF%ISTING SDE) PERCENT SLOPE VARIATION: APPRODMAlELY 0.2P,6 TOPOGRAPHY CHANGES: THE SIT WILL REMAIN RELATIVELY LEVEL. VEGETATION: VERY LITTLE VEGETATION IS EXISTING ON-SITE, 511E WAT PREVIOUTLYA COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT CONSISTING OFBUILDINGS ANO PAVED AREAS. SOME PAVED AREAS STILL REMAIN. TXEESANOIANDs[gPED AREAS ARE PROPOSED, INCREASING THE GREENAREASIGNIFICANRY. AVERAGE SLOPE: (REFER TO CGP FOR DEfINRION] SITE SOILS SUMMARY (SOURCE: GEOTECHNICAL REPORT #B14-07389, BV BRAUN INTERTEC, 31/14/2014) TOIL TYPE ANDTEXNRF: THE GENERAL SOIL PROFILE AT THE SITE CONSISTEDOFASURFACE LAYER OF EITHER TOPSOIL OR PAVEMENTCOMPOSED OF BITUMINOUS OR CONCRETE. FILL W AS ENCOUNTERED BENEATH THE SUflFACE LAYEfl ANO EMENDED TO DEPTHS VARYING FROM OT012 FEET.THE UNDERLYING NATURAL SOILS CONSISTED OF GLACIAL OUTWASH SANDS, TESTER AMOUNTS Of GLACIAL TILL CLAYS IN SANDE, AND OCCASIONAL GIACIALFLUVIAL SANDSANDSILTS. AVERAGE DEPTH OFTOPSOR: THE TOPSOIL TYPICALLY CONSISTED OF SILTYSgNDTNATWAT MOBTgHD TYPICALLY VARIED IN THICKNESS FROM ABOUT0.4 T02 FEET IS TO ..I AVERAGE DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER: GROUNDWATER WAS OBSERVED 16 T028 FEEFBOOW 111EGROUNOSURFA[E CORRESPONgNG TO ELEVATIONS VARYING FROM ABOUT 853 T086B. V400 N80H-A31HIN MMM SIOZ/ZO/Z0:31V0 11 -1b1-111 :3NOHd waM_ �} WU 31InS ' V" S3M 3AV A ISN3AINn 0SSZ N%'lntld '15 Sg/gt7 AB 03NO3H0 S11t/13a IO�IlNOO �yILN341S32i �l0 CJ z O 4 1 N 839%aN 35N3011. NYi SSW 9Ntltl8 0 NO1iViN3WIa3S Nw'.13�WAN3al0051HVdSMM'LS o - / ^� ]Wd '0 SVOII 03N`DIS30 \ � � w Mwa AB 'g NOIS02i3 1S3M�I2]t/d �t1b1N3� o a o -.. _._ f� ■ :833NI9N3 N9I530 31vos PA _ e o e r r _ z vk o �o o= as a 53 C, a � R jaoB mao a o r s a - oN Y a. Q tt w V1 z � W _J W is H € 3 Y =e a Q m 's€; o q q < a w g z 0 �gE4Rg�g kza -� d bSm zr N U W 2 W } FLLa z JJ 3 0 F- CL a g g �w N co > Z < F- 3 `<�<vc p<<W O Z J A o � r� $a ' a = s �� m0 a'v U- 10 J 0;�4 € b z 7 W U d X �- Z (NnWINIWI .[ (NNYIININ) .t g°a �` a Q W cr iy ffi€�=w�o ;sago d 3 N� a KK boog53--T4 USPO 6 -o�<o _� x g bog�oo E!zo!2< " 0 e bom� ��"�q�F•B,;o � vsagA�€as$ ce'so a�sm �jw � -w>n - � g <" a° .ate m y s ped 'j� o W! Z. gewo aces$ yP9 So �g <d�$zoe msF�e `wB€rtlas a=<ew 89p j.w o aq a \\\\\�\\�\w=s�as�3 ^�b=wjgwaF<oaa<� SWg 3 a $" o a�Fbs�pw�aa \\ \\ \\ `a dW "sa wssaW r_ ga oda z§ -1, a=- ate a " N =F =mko bh osCD k8 O < �= K dam SR € z \\ \\ \ 59 a� g <iwoc>N�����y Nzac>�z-, ..QawoLL�z � is 5o5 m`d�"€`$;e` = aB g �� ia-omlf,�rCiaWo owa�a�a�� is<�u�-orcrcrc3 jab€sa=e s' -=b e�ma g� a°€W� sW:„7€Wsa@= s WHO =M9 z- m e�� � �\ Q I F `E so9§A' aFP: �gWe "_ - F i� :ukiRA8�=y€Rc w^8=be=�y Z w w yao wo g "Mme! o€ate¢ a Y€€!s?<` N a �=£eaa=-BFm =aQas"a ==`J� - _ v w° " r " e " a a ? a � i 0 § _ o z om< w - .12� Fz�o Ps v Q�Wo� mss` o Ngo"i� ___ \ z Z'^ k� 3z z aF n ��zoz < a=m< o =� p _ zo ado LL El's¢ gY= a W e <� o�FOQz $e <eag G Ns� �g @� a a e #° - 9 N�� w W o aBLL €< c z�i kS Sa g- B �� 2p '" — z 0aa—'mo M. w- N n a :y o o..y c>o > Ry >ono�eoco o>o -i > w� , =.e . %w v>o a.»oo , a,r o� •slu � a � � 0 0 ¢ m z — a � a m o � w w o 0 o W W W w W u u u u u u u u u z w � W Mein �onm C3 a Z a W tj 1c a E Nd O W ILI "DO NaOH-A3IVIINMMM L6L4-S69-IS9 3NO Hd 'lntld '15 S[0Z/ZQ/ZQ'31'd4 wnUM A9 03N33HO S-11VJ30 -Oi�1NOO lt/I1N341S32J Old � = o W bILSS NVI So/ qt7 it =�� `m d% �w `Y6 <3A $ w Ae NMvaa NBCZ 311n5 '153M 3AV AJISa3AINn ",z a39Y1fIN 35N33H N% NOIJYJ_N�WIa3S Nw `A3lTdn N3aloJ/>ibdd slnol 'ls - Q aCD U w O U.IDH Vkk)�1 1 1w V 1.11 j� '8 NOISO213 1S3M112ibd lt/b1N3� o a <o 3NAvd sv�m :833N9N3 NOI530 ^"��A 03N 1530 11tl35 1 Y 1 9 §a a=j t 8 d,§ Pe =e lie 0 � B it =�� `m d% �w `Y6 <3A eg-gS d F all AR a` ge= u eo= @ <6a bg., =g 13 b < <1 a �k Q my QoS us Qi � <o `_g a a a� s 2 ieb � 1 wS Ps `3< @aYC YBs gas 66 8 dw 1 : ulg �� Aia 'k W UN P Al mum is! Pat z o € �8 ` 9i 30 W WIQ Y 1 9 §a a=j t 8 d,§ "=a =e lie 0 � B as b ko d� S i„ � � � �W 1r= z �m8 If d F -= Ss} " E$ S = a"gi =-g 6e 13 b < <1 a 1>B Q my _ ,g� o 1ga Qi � <o `_g a a a� s 2 s<< � 1 119 a€j w zo gas 66 8 dw 1 � @€B N ulg �� Aia 66 S W - mum is! Pat z o € �8 ` 9i 30 W WIQ F W-Bkg mmQ €¢ B 4 U w !aj ��< <i %S a oA Rip " 0. F � a op $_ =k£ E ME d� Jab �� g s= �_ s a'a j@� z A.: B o= = WN 6 al Zia =@ o � B e im oil is m3W i t' 1: 1 @��j pe g w Sys z o W =e wo o ,__ _ v s ,, ,N y _ ry < RIG; JI d`g a id S o- Awa Iva ego RE! e` 5 e m 3 go SWS Q B<u, sm 3 o= w FzI Na gdk Pa` 3 N k€€��� �� M D sW� too moi 1AH1 Ed; Hu Vii H. "—ao- gpm so 56 HW <u d" Ian &db@o a§=�g� cup,on NN, b�£ �� a ��pa€ HI hhD qw;May y qg— z61 §nypt aREEFI S I e Y �gC" € xWe ;aa@ a w=- o� ut is3tlo€� g so, id - 11 R € @bahoa WB ;€ w=�ae § F WORD 3= 0591 W s 91 slim 3 y.oq w s<o a e>mb€=g� sio;=€ P1. !MKS `a £�� a":ego g Q itmassa S q a Va"m, s ago !aluBit R a`a e`�8 ma B did o" Ing! EST an 33= g= €£kON — 3o"d $m 102 W&W, 012 oll 04 �§ < V of �g� a o�a " 4 � o "_�_ ma o g�w� Se so<: vg o�� o _���ega� so U a sa 1-o 5g�€ €3-=' z`k�- aW 6= �aw z oo$" @w o =8 �B a I g''u�j 20, s n a �e�HOM Q4 � ale Ro ins a' a s N AS N € a � A�"�P. ab€ W ao " g ae. o w Z �_ `am --.-o § a X19" s§�. a ��=gam@a` =c`e �N �" a a `�@Fl "8 oaa gad a= mwa B oa?�€o <�€< o s"o say fig. m A "a i�§�B o a ;" - -�a =2„g z W"§ egg ���se � at< Bo _N =a="o� Vim` a g�eA aaa g e@g CPO 8 ���� a aWo B VN o8�2 " Sego ow=4tl 4s€ w IN"B�" u �� o U kw �a €<�„gauge g'` § >83 b; aW ao @ las ea s�� a _�wwk a� .�§I aj wee§ Bea @a € No `§��� $F �� His �w=a a<=�=3g�g; =s+�go =s v!j �A N, a; =s @ 90 a`="- a= �l< piss" a-e”=§"o ea=" „' ” �o =a `s= ar s§e§ m a 'g F " �a �3<oa"aeg =a !Ram � __ � " a�= �"�$� .a s o=@� :g' � off!"'B"'HIN Egli 5g wa m= a am& saB$ 'a o= -fea wwl€o 'e "ga a=- s� `s €«m "F��- �" "a`W E �m des @�� o �@ =p ssm= re` `� e@eazZ<yo€ �= 8a��"�� g a�a. a. F a wga .�� $o =o� =CWF_ "g Hs All_ a" s e= a F"a= Baa milli��"_ W"a Wa <"�emlv« �o 3S" S 1190 Y< 1 9 §a a=j t 8 d,§ "=a =e lie 0 � B it! i„ � � _ � � SK �W <g a^a 01 a` d lowamu £gW -= Ss} " E$ S = a"gi =-g 6e 13 b < <1 a 1>B 3y =off `�N _ ,g� o 1ga Qi � <o `_g a a a� s m ==Ba'a, s<< � 1 119 g gas 66 8 dw 1 � @€B N € m8 Aia 66 S W � ��; how mum is! Pat i". 9i 30 W WIQ B _ a W-Bkg mmQ B _ §� j w !aj ��< <i %S a oA Rip " Mo, F � a op $_ =k£ E ME d� Jab �� g s= �_ s a'a j@� z A.: B o= = WN 6 al Zia =@ o � B e im oil is i t' 1: 1 @��j pe g w e z o W =e wo o ,__ _ v s ,, ,N y _ ry < RIG; JI a a id S o- Awa Iva ego RE! e` 5 e m 3 go SWS Q B<u, sm 3 o= w FzI Na gdk Pa` I. n. �S =ee � dd �€j @ 3W oE< _' In h �o5<;�p o -! 1 NMA a— g � �, CN e` "a Gi sgo B o d 3 ;ZOO: ell! � am�<z � o 1N ma §� Yo GyY W '€B o vwi ` ` was eq Yw =03 Y yak `< Of = _Q1 k im m k w 46 He S`o < 6w <' €><S a ao�HS o $ a"==gym : dA MIR! �,g �Y`ll � n as -.a =� 82w W o `a.Eo V��oo E < Al 6 g@e�ov N` U all gINGa < § 9 @ k ` o. �m Y z W9 = WO -90 � <= �a I"__ W z ` Hur u ; , �`� b� a A` <�3b _ IN H �tl &Bks aea"eh�MOO �3�� a �omW�§� �'�`�� F a w rku_ 0591 W s 91 slim 3 y.oq w s<o a e>mb€=g� sio;=€ P1. !MKS `a £�� a":ego g Q itmassa S q a Va"m, s ago !aluBit R a`a e`�8 ma B did o" Ing! EST an 33= g= €£kON — 3o"d $m 102 W&W, 012 oll 04 �§ < V of �g� a o�a " 4 � o "_�_ ma o g�w� Se so<: vg o�� o _���ega� so U a sa 1-o 5g�€ €3-=' z`k�- aW 6= �aw z oo$" @w o =8 �B a I g''u�j 20, s n a �e�HOM Q4 � ale Ro ins a' a s N AS N € a � A�"�P. ab€ W ao " g ae. o w Z �_ `am --.-o § a X19" s§�. a ��=gam@a` =c`e �N �" a a `�@Fl "8 oaa gad a= mwa B oa?�€o <�€< o s"o say fig. m A "a i�§�B o a ;" - -�a =2„g z W"§ egg ���se � at< Bo _N =a="o� Vim` a g�eA aaa g e@g CPO 8 ���� a aWo B VN o8�2 " Sego ow=4tl 4s€ w IN"B�" u �� o U kw �a €<�„gauge g'` § >83 b; aW ao @ las ea s�� a _�wwk a� .�§I aj wee§ Bea @a € No `§��� $F �� His �w=a a<=�=3g�g; =s+�go =s v!j �A N, a; =s @ 90 a`="- a= �l< piss" a-e”=§"o ea=" „' ” �o =a `s= ar s§e§ m a 'g F " �a �3<oa"aeg =a !Ram � __ � " a�= �"�$� .a s o=@� :g' � off!"'B"'HIN Egli 5g wa m= a am& saB$ 'a o= -fea wwl€o 'e "ga a=- s� `s €«m "F��- �" "a`W E �m des @�� o �@ =p ssm= re` `� e@eazZ<yo€ �= 8a��"�� g a�a. a. F a wga .�� $o =o� =CWF_ "g Hs All_ a" s e= a F"a= Baa milli��"_ W"a Wa <"�emlv« �o 3S" S 1190 Y< 1 9 -031a o d in, WR Mae! IS 1 6e k ? m .FQ m ==Ba'a, �w KulB=€ �wasny �a< gNOW g oa � m 66 8 dw 1 wz 1s 66 S o�oapw �$a � ��; how ' §Yogi$@ " i". 9i 30 W WIQ B _ a W-Bkg mmQ �� it it eN g w A 30� �vF =„3 lout �EegMo� -54 Q E b6 3 A< (n d -d A.: �3 = WN 6 2€ M o � B e im d- @��j pe g w em r€ �� ss Q w8 �� a3 g< �tl §�So 3dgo a• �m dm y _ ry < RIG; JI a a 3W yam'=` U �b I mbWN F; �o5<;�p `<€ ads 6 '§ =g�Q�g € <� JO o�=o < 3 ;ZOO: ell! � am�<z � o pm! !M� IN 9W o ”. @ = c `gep� ` Qas§�a € w N e w`�" = _Q1 k im < Plan" N_'_ aZ m= �_ a ao�HS o $ a"==gym : dA MIR! �,g �Y`ll � W o `a.Eo V��oo E < Al 6 g@e�ov N` U all gINGa < § 9 @ k o. �m Y z W9 = WO -90 � �aa3€� c" cj) z ` Hur u ; , �`� b� a A` � aea"eh�MOO �3�� a �omW�§� �'�`�� F a w Ax� ��a>do =e's _ N nd Pas 10 €Cm CSq,.PdB w` d �@ +4{' +141 uP .W v 3Bp b`$ g@=�SYo« q !Pool § g = �y B�� V paluac c+P Puo syl 4 lN�zoN eo Idg4 Sq od�m�iW� �gG3m � as N�eV 1�tB�=�S o oW Mm N om�m_ a H O 3 0 0 Z 1 9 o d o a a 6e N m .FQ �w El ia6 S� il ? � 2 < 66 8 dw 1 wz 1s 66 S gN e� i". 9i 30 W WIQ B _ a a �� it it eN g w A CZ 1 9 d m U Fgy a a .FQ �w El ia6 S� il ? � 2 < 66 8 dw 1 wz 1s 66 S 9i 30 W WIQ "=B ar it it eN g w A 30� a m S A< (n d -d U WN 6 2€ M d- a w em r€ �� ss Q w8 �� a3 g< �tl §�So 3dgo a• �m dm y _ ry = ryai " CZ ��a>do +4{' +141 uP +41 q PaPua c la V paluac c+P Puo syl 4 I EXISTINGNH)(rANT— TO REMAIN # ( r��Y, EF E 3 J a 0 TYP SEE TRII PREMRVAT.N EXISTING XI 0 STING H REMAIN 7 A Irr— PLAN FOR TREE REMOVALS �ITE'�- =MR IS RE TIC, cy (3 j 3! o 0 0 x X X X x K 01 7-7 % 0A x 7-t k9( -�c x x x x & GA !2 CONTRACTOR CAP WATERMAIN ATRIEMOVALUMI 7-, Typ. S EE MCES PLANS FOIR REMOVAl-SlIMPRQVEME'T3'"4 • 4 "�-' 47 3 TYP. -4z. LEGEND GENERAL NOTES "N 1. ALLWORKSHALLSE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITHTHECITYOFGOUDENVAUEY PROPERTY LINE/ ROW -r4 'S AND ST. LOUIS PARK SPECIFICATIONS AND SLIMING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. WORK vvy. WITHIN WAY TA BOULEVARD WILL REQUIRE A MNDOT ROWOUTILITY PERMIT CITY LIMITUNE No• o loo zl 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE ALL UNDERGROUND PUBUCANDPRIVATE UTILITIES LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE LOCATED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, EXISTING CURB ANDGUrTER S REFERENCE TREE PRESERVATION PLAN FOR REMOVALS OFEXISTINGTREES. EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER TO BE REMOVED -Z- 4,CONTRACTOR SH UTILITIES AND TO FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND EUIiVATIONSOFEXISTNG POGRAPHIC FEATURES, SUCH AS EXISTING GUTTER GRADES ATTHE EXISTING BUILDING PROPOSED DRIVEWAYS, PRIOR TO THE STARTOFSMEWORK EXISTING STORM SEWER 5. CONTRACTOR SHALLIMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OFANY DISCREPANCIES OR EXISTING STORM CATCH BASIN/MANHOLE VARIATIONS FROM THE PLANS. S. ALL PAVEMENT, CURB& GUTTER TO BE REMOVED SHALL M SAWCUTAT REMOVAL EXISTINGSANITARYSEVVER LIMITS OR NEARESTJOINT. KEYNOTE LEGEND EXISTING SANITARY MANHOLE T UTILITIES NOT MARKED FOR REMOVAL SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM DAMAGE WRING W— EXISTING WATERMAIN (D REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT CONSTRUCTION. THIS WORK SHALL BE INCIDENTALTOCONTRACT. OREMOVE CONCRETE PAVEMENT S. STREET SHALL BE SWEPT IN ACCORDANCEWMH CITYREQUIREMENTS EXISTING FIREHYDRANT a DG REMOVE CURB ANDGurTER 9, COORDINATE REMOVALS OF PRIVATE UTIUTIESWTHUTLTYCOMPANIES. EXISTING GATEVAVVE (D EXISTINGSIGNTOBE REMOVED 10. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN APPROVED BYTHE CRY EXISTING GAS UNE PRIOR TO COMMENONG ANY WORK WITHIN THE CITY ROW. rn EXISTING WATERMAIN TO BE REMOVED& EXISTING CHAIN UNK FENCE O RELOCATED, REFERENCE UTILITY PLAN, ii. ALL TRUNK LINES OR SERVICE LINES TO BE REMOVEDSHAI-I-BE PLUGGEDAT MAIN. ALERT TO CONTRACTOR: X EXISTING CHAIN LINK FENCE TO BE REMOVED OB SAWCUT PAVEMENT12. CONTRACTOR TO SEAL AND GROUT OPENINGSASANDONEDATEXISTING 1. THE PRESENCE OF GROUNDWATER SHOULD BE ANTICIPATED ON THIS PROJECT. CONTRACTOR'S BID DISCONNECTS EXISTING LIGHT MILED.EXISTING LIGHT POLE TO BE REMOVED SH ALL INCLUDE CONSIDERATION FOR THIS ISSUE. MEN PERFORMING GRADING OPERATIONS DURINGPERIODS OF WET WEATHER, PROVIDE ADEQUATEDIEWATERING, DRAINAGEAND GROUND u TT 13. CONCRETE RUSHING OF BUILDING MATERIALS IS ALLOWED ONSITE. HOURS OF OPERATION SHALL BE LIMITED TO 700AWO 7:MPM. CONCRETEMBEREUSEDAS EXISTING LIGHT POLE TO BE REMOVED E ISTINGHYDRANTTOBEREMOVED& WATERMANAGEMENT TO CONTROL MOISTURE OF SOILS. REFERTOMASTERSITESPECIFICATIONS. O RELOCATED. COORDINATEWITHOWNE E EXISTINGSIGN R ALL CONTRACTORS MUST CONTACT 2. ALL GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED (EARTHWORK FINAL UTILITIES, AND FINAL AGGREGATE BASE SHALL CONFORM TO THE MNDOTSPECIRCATION MR WHICH sEXISTING GAS MAIN TO BE REMOVED GOPHER STATE CALL ONE GRADING)BYTHE MILESTONE DATE IN PROJECT DOCUMENTS OUT-OTAREA TO BE KEPT FREE OF MATERIAL WILL MUSED, BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT TO BE REMOVED MN TOLL FREE 1-800-252-1166 JOBTRAILERSAND STORAGE AFTER THE CONTRACT MILESTONEDATEFORDIEOUTLOT GENERAL 14, CONSTRUCTION LIMITS TO BE THE PROPERTY UNE UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. O 10 EXISTING STOCK PILE TO BE REMOVED CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE CLEAR ACCESS FOR OUTLOT CONTRACTOR TO THE SPECIFIC PARCEL AT C CONCRETE PAVEMENT TO BE REMOVED BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS �LLPTINIES LIMENTSAND PONTRAC R TO REMOVE ITEMS WITHIN CONSTRUCTION UMITSASSHOMONTHE V P RE=LESTONE DATE, PURCHASER OF 0 TLOTTOPROVIDEPERMITI)OC PLANS AND DIRECTED PER THE OWNERSREPRESENTATPVE. TWIN CITY AREA 651-454-0002 YSTAT�OC�REQUIREPAE�MR�ECIFICOUTLOT. 11 REMOVE STRUCTURE (g) 0 OD -Q) - UTILITYTOBEABANDONED 15. EX ISTING WATERMAIN TO BE ABANDONED IS TO BECAPPEDATTHE MAIN AND BUM GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET HEADED. 0 25 50 100 X X X X X - X - UTILITY TO BE REMOVED 16. CO TRACTOR TO REMOVE EXISTING CATCH BASINS AND STORM SEWER CONNECTIONS E.I.TIN.-EE TO CITY TRUNK UNES. >11 0 z 0 z s 2 c-4 Ow 12Z 06 < C/) (D z a- 0 U) U) < > Lu Z 0 0 2i Lu Z 2 Lu U) < Lu > z < Lo'j F - Z < L 0 Fn LEI 0� cr F -- z Lu C) 0 -i F-: U) DATE 02/02/2015 PROJECT NO. 160755001 SHEET NUMBER 6030 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1 16 4 AVENUE IMPROVE&ENT PLANS fITICA W - -�~ SOUTH .. 453 SIF g0l AQ _ RaWvACATION UTILITY EASEMENT UTI v, -.. .......:. .. ...... -_ _ r .. .. �. .:. ...:.. .., �. ,� :1..'. ,�. - 1ROW OEDICATOL4 E -...... ^-. UfiU1Y EASEMENT • . • '' •!• •.,� _.' _ �IL - A -EID j- 4L- _ _ - - .0 ❑ I LOT 2 -RESIDENTIAL PHASE 2 } 'I B - - _ J *,( - UTILITY EASEMENT p p -- Q 6STORIES-164 UNITS 79 -1ST LEVEL STALLS i _l LINEAR PARK- STORMWATER 156- UNDERGROUND STALLS - t PRIVATELYOWNED TREATMENT WOONERF I EA6EMEMU PUBLIC OPEN SPACE I 4S DRAINAGE& I REFER TO LANDSCAPE ' DRAINAGE& i UTILITY EASEMENT✓' ' '.. PLAN UTILITY EASEMENT - I � n b ° RESIDEN11ALPOOL I O OUTLOT A - OFFICE O OUTLOT A - OFFICE AMENmAREA pEQ z E PHASE 2 PHASE i PARK EASEMENT • ' o . .. • SERVICE/ a 3 o Q n MOVE -IN AREA o I 3 Q �� _ 3 - - Vlf ❑ LOT 1 LOT EXISTING I a a- f Q RESIDENTIAL PHASE 1D DRAINAGE & D HEALTH I Q 6sTORIEs-199uNlTs LOTS -HOTEL UTUTYEASEMENT r OUTLOT A 78 - 1ST LEVEL STALLS , / PARTNERS 198 - UNDERGROUND STALLS 6 STORIES -150 ROOMS 30- UNDERGROUND STALLS CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK I s 'J 00 N �91 ..-- -- -- -- ' CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY T U L / VARIABLE WIDTH ACCESS EASEMENT S 15BUILDINGSETBACK E 4sDRAINAGE& ��_.. �O �.I I. RESIDENTIAL POOL,__ �� o a uTILmEASEMENT 1 0 I' AMENITY AREA }....... ,•., m 3 S q EXISTING ACCESS - ( _ - ...... .. EASEMENT � .._ , I � I I I / � l I to � I W y r Lu a q T a. 9 " PARK EASEMENT b 3� - �l(A0 p Q J a EXISTING ACCE8.4 a _ d. EA6EMEM - - - E 77 - - - - Lu G 5 A 10'DRAINAGEL 8 UTLITY EASEMENT STATE-------� � HIGHWAY 100 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET .2 EXISTING WAYZATA BLw I / O 25 50 100 J H a \ HIGHWAY 100 UNDERPASS Q LU ° LU> SITE NOTES Z Q ALL CONTRACTORS MUST CONTACT 1. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROTECTION OFALL PROPERTYCORNERS. 10.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REPAIRING THE DAMAGE DONETOANYEXISTING Y w GOPHER STATE CALL ONE ALERT TO CONTRACTOR. ITEM DURING CONSTRUCTION, SUCH AS, BUT NOT UMITEDTO, DRAINAGE, UTILITIES, Z CENTRAL PARK WEST SITE DATATABLE THE PRESENCEOFGROUNOWATERSHOULDBEANTICIPAEDONHISPROECTCONRACTOR'SBID 2. CON TRACTORSMALL MATCH PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER,CONCRETE AND PAVEMENT PAVEMENT, STRIPING, CURB, REPAIRS SHALL BE EQUAL TO, OR BETTER (L MN TOLL FREE 1-BOO-ZS2-1166 TO EXISTING IN GRADEANDAUGNMENT. EXISTING CONDITIONS. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLETODOCUMENT ALL EXISTING Q 0 SHALL INCLUDE CONSIDERATION FOR THIS ISSUE. WHEN PERFORMINGGRADINGOPERATIONS DAMAGE AND NOTIFY CONSTRUCTION MANAGER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCRON START. c a BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS LOT TOTAL AREA PERVIOUSAREA IMPERVIOUSAREA DURING PERIODS OF WET WEATHER, PROVIDE ADEQUATE DEWATERING, DRAINAGEANOGROUNO D_ V _ TWIN CITY AREA 661-454-0002 WATER MANAGEMENT TO CONTROL MOISTURE OF SOILS. REFERTO MASTER SITE SPECIFICATIONS. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE EXISTING PAVEMENTANO CONCRETE IN ACCORDPNCE J (n OUTLOT A -FUTURE OFFICE 6.80 ACRES 1.20 ACRES 5.70 ACRES WITH SPECIFICATIONS. 11. CONTRACTOR SHALL TOUCH-UP PAINT ON ALL LIGHTFOLEBASES,RREHYDRANTSAND Q Y w LOT1- PHASE I RESIDENTIAL 3.46 ACRES 0.88 ACRES 2 $ 2. ALL GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED EARTHWORK FlNPL UTILITIES, AND FINAL CURBS WHICH ARE CURRENTLY PAINTED. COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE BASE BID. . 4. TH E EARTHWORK FOR ALL BUILDING FOUNDATIONS AND SLABS SHALL BE IN x PT `g 57 ACRES GRADING) BY THE MILESTON E DATE IN PROJECT DOCUMENTS. OUTLOTAREA TO BE KEFREE OF LEGEND LOT 2- PHASE 2 RESIDENTIAL 1.53 ACRES 0.35 ACRES 1.18 ACRES JOB TRAILERS AND STORAGE AFTER THE CONTRACT MILESTONE DATE FOR THE OUTLOT GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH SPECIFICATIONS. 12. CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE OR RELOCATE, WHEN APPLICABLE, ALL EXISTING BUILDINGS, Q SANRARY rV FOUNDATIONS,BASEMENTS, CONNECTING IMPROVEMENTS,DRAINPIPES, LOT 3 -FUTURE HOTEL 1.61 ACRES 0.39 ACRES 1.22 ACRES CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE CLE AR ACCESS FOR OUTLOT CONTRACTOR TOTHE SPECIFIC PARCEL AT Z D- V J ALL TIMES AFTER MILESTONE DATE. PURCHASER OF OUTLOT TO PROVIDE PERMIT DOCUMENTS AND S. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO ARCH ITECTURAL-SFORACTUALBUILDINGAND SEWER PIPES, POWER POLES, AND GUY WIRES, WATER METERSANDWATER LINES, w Q o CITY PROPERTY UNE/ROW TOTAL 13.49 ACRES 2.82 ACRES 10.67 ACRES SWPPP RED IR IRED BV STATE/LOCAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SPECIFIC OUTLOT. SIDEWALK DIMENSIONS, PORCH AND RAMP LOCATIONS. WELLS, SIDEWALKS, SIGN POLES, UNDERGROUND GAS,SEPRCTARKSARDASPHPLT, 0 SHOWN AND NOT SHOWN, WITHIN CONSTRUCTION UNITS ANDWHERE NEEDED,TO V 6. GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS TO COORDINATE WITH APPROPRIATE UITLRY COMPANIESALLOW FOR NEW CONSTRUCTIONASSHOWN. LOT LINE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, ADJUSTMENT OR RELOCATIONOFEXISTNG UTIUTESAS O PROPOSED CURB MO GUTTER DESIGNATED ON PLANS. 13. CONTRACTOR SHALL FOLLOW ALL LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL REGU WTIONS IN EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER s . EXISTING BUILDING LIMITS OF UNDERGROUND PARKING 1/ S STOP BAR K �. DIRECTIONALARROW E / '- -^ J ROW DEDICATION .,_ -` -". '140 ADDITIONAL PARKING SPACES HAVE BEEN PROVIDED IN THE RAMP TO MEETTHE REQUIRED PARKING RATIO FORTHE FUTURE HOTEL 9. CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL GOVERNING CODES AND BE CONSTRUCTED TO 6040 IT J ROW VACATION SAME. DISPOSING OF DEMOLISHED MATERIALS REMOVED FROM THIS SITE. 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE PIPE BOLLARDS FOR PROTECTION OFALLABOVE GROUND UTILITIES AND APPURTENANCES IN ORNE AREAS. CENTRAL PARK WEST PARKING DATATABLE LOT USE SIZE REQUIRED PARKING (PER SLP CODE) REQUIRED PARKING (PER GOLDEN VALLEY CODE) STANDARD PARKING COMPACT PARKING ADA PARKING TOTAL PARKING BICYCLE PARKING OUTLOTA FUTURE OFFICE 706,706SF 2,474 SPACES (3.5 SPACEWIJ= SF) 2,827 SPACES (4 SPACES/IJ= SF) 2,586 SPACES 0SPACES 48SPACES 2,634 SPACES (3.72 SPACES/1,-SF) 285 SPACES (10% OF TOTAL PARKING) LOT1 PHASEIRESIDENTIAL 199UNITS/294ROOMS 294 SPACES (I SPACE/BEDROOM) 299 SPACES (1.5 SPACESOWEWNG) 260 SPACES 52 SPACES 9SPACES 321 SPACES(1.09 SPACES!BEDROOM) 112 SPACES (W% OF TOTALPARKING) LOT2 PHASE2RESIDENTULL IUUNITS/235ROOMS 235 SPACES (I SPACE/BEDROOM) 246 SPACES (1.5 SPACES4]WELUNG) 180SPACES 34 SPACES 8SPACES 235 SPACES (I W SPACES/BEDROOM) 100 SPACES (42% OF TOTAL PARKING) LOTS FUTURE HOTEL 150 ROOMS 225 (1.5 SPACES/ROOM) 225 SPACES (1.5 SPACESUNR) 79 SPACES 0SPA2ES 6SPACES 85' SPACES (0.57 SPACES/ROOM) 0SPACES (0% OF TOTAL PARKING) TOTAL 3,228 SPACES 3,597 SPACES 3,125 SPACES 86 SPACES 71 SPACES 3,282 SPACES 477 SPACES (15% OF TOTAL PKG) .,_ -` -". '140 ADDITIONAL PARKING SPACES HAVE BEEN PROVIDED IN THE RAMP TO MEETTHE REQUIRED PARKING RATIO FORTHE FUTURE HOTEL 9. CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL GOVERNING CODES AND BE CONSTRUCTED TO 6040 IT J ROW VACATION SAME. DISPOSING OF DEMOLISHED MATERIALS REMOVED FROM THIS SITE. 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE PIPE BOLLARDS FOR PROTECTION OFALLABOVE GROUND UTILITIES AND APPURTENANCES IN ORNE AREAS. 14. DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF CURB UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. GATE B. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL %NISMDSPEOFICATIONS FOR ACTUALLOCATION OF ALL UTILITY ENTRANCES,TOINCLUDE, SMITARYSEWER 15. CONTRACTOR TO REFER TO LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION PLAN FOR RELOCATIONS AND ADDITIONS. 02/02/2015 LATERALS, DOMESTIC AND FIRE PROTECTION WATER SERVICE, ELECTRICAL, NATURAL PROJECT NO. GAS AND TELEPHONE SERVICE. CONTRACTOR SHALLCDORDINATEIMSTAUATIONOF UTILITIES IN SUCH A MANNER AS TO AVOID CONFLICTS AND ASSURE PROPER DEPTHS ISPLANS SUBMITTED FOR PERMITTING SHALL MEETTHECITTSCODESANDALL APPLICABLE BUILDING CODES IN EFFECTATTHETIME, 160755001 ARE ACHIEVED, AS WELL AS COORDINATE WITH ANY UITLRYCOMPANIES FOR APPROVED LOCATIONS AND SCHEDULING OF TIEANS/CONNECTIONS TO THEIR SHEET NUMBER FACILITIES. .,_ -` -". '140 ADDITIONAL PARKING SPACES HAVE BEEN PROVIDED IN THE RAMP TO MEETTHE REQUIRED PARKING RATIO FORTHE FUTURE HOTEL 9. CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL GOVERNING CODES AND BE CONSTRUCTED TO 6040 IT J ROW VACATION SAME. NW'NaoH-A31111A' M S mz/z0/zd" L6L>-9b9-LS9 :ANOHd VI(IM 0 W VILSS NN '1nVd '1S AB (13A33H0 N9ez 31Ins 'Ls3M 3AY ulSNWNn ossz S8L9� �b'I1N3aIS32i ��4 z o 839NnN 3SN3on NW SSW (� 3 S`dH d) �f 0 _— /�O� /����'�'� MV'O A9 NMVi1N N`d�d X11 S NW '�l3ll`d/� N34lOJ/>i2�`dd SIf10� 1S o0 0 o w p U /` 3N�vd n sv�m A9 03NOIS30 1S3M �i Vd IVUN30 ° w N d � _ :833NION3 NOIS30O 31tl05 aQ b FF 10 LLO ZCZ - �8b NORTH � � a LU 1 ` . M J aa 7 dK LIW DZ W O Q w I M I \ \\ LLI LU IN 7 ¢Q IP w ff N 31H a /� fy i O J m d r oS Zoo z o16 LLz ' W o 1 W s \ r h � W�6 ZO O 3Nll01— � 11w. b m 1 •, t71.J. U . ❑ a 126W\L 'U Q ,yy I 2¢Yj 3 I!•I °i yl v, I _.I I3m II u gg ❑a QKJ�F I l - FL zFo I I}}II I ' J aQr jO� 0SJa �� N f 777 OJW 0OppO 10ZW."Zi R JI 1{ 06 LU cc RZS.a m m C gg / J I ---- -- — m I I .m If °° a Z p' o I Its—I 1 x Z aoi0' 3N1101 RI ZQ�sc c i'. 0 u., 3NI1101 O W p 1 N If1101IY 1 U N 0 1 O� -- 1,'.. I l m v vU $ N LLL u —71 If I co Lul o t 111 l_ 3 y� J 'Jz "1nEti S z00 U 9 � zF�y�x x N vv,z �n $J� a �n g z k'° )N Y ip$ N �g m " ��+W3 �wa °e <oapsa 8 z o mw ale p 4 s s w w° $ x¢Sww u e omww Z - i m '� J o w w ~ �w 1^ o <� z ~ 5 m° " " "23-a i'8o�o o wo�u" _ e W < ww i w w< gg a ° ax J w LL �i ig yNs "aw�w Fu U' - w wo '6 N u 5a w w� x=w 8 a�, oR R0: `a rc iw N xe se o,-- w v0 ~�o �o-wzv�0 W of mak' z� ff i $ " eve a eW o °m 29 ,av��x w' N a; °�` rc�i� °mow °¢ J ° g s $,g ° s ° o a`~'a w�n a' �N Hodes m �� ° °iy m "a 26 W w� "o a" a > - < iLL ma Y =w m°ate - o w" w uHrci w <w 5a i o i �� Fwa Z syii'm Qzwuooi O -w °o o� x $ o w v do w �W ,",a,°, oh o uN �� °""of S "°� o" � ho og xHo Z zo"N� oe�z po Qo ave U� w� w>� - Y00 xw .�¢=0V 'U Z �O �x a '' i LLO m zw -a $� uw� ave o� $� xia u os=a $ %% sw wai Q a`u "s LL" ao h <� u 1 rc3 -" m ao aLLs ° e. "s eo w aLL an =5 sw w° - i-" a a J aaa�Fi } 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 O O 0® 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a W p R W ooio$�� oo��=moo Y � aoo ao�a=aoz�3""o <" " =oaav a w�N a �aml• o _cawnH Rv volmoawa vvo vona:Ho.Haa v =rvy v valve, ,aao,awi pva yo a „aa9•,aea,a a v>!v ,a, ,. maa o .w ,ol 'Na 0 atul cl 'eay.,ee ya wewruyaui u Q ca U O W I1_ 2 A j, I 1 w t; k . W z � <O zo y 1� w - HNNHHNi� I 11i z J j co 0 �JNme HHHNNHIIN � I NHNHHHMN3 HHHH"Hi" / •t 11 IILLLLI'. jx N Z � Z ppp! wFy (3� �U of O l 2 LLJ o � H � � LO I~wz� Q U) � 0 ¢ V zWlw�u OV=O�Z m� QO �w3 W 0 ` w 0 a O Y a o ° ~ o g U O a w " w O 0 0 x M Z Lul o t 111 l_ 3 y� J 'Jz "1nEti S z00 U 9 � zF�y�x x N vv,z �n $J� a �n g z k'° )N Y ip$ N �g m " ��+W3 �wa °e <oapsa 8 z o mw ale p 4 s s w w° $ x¢Sww u e omww Z - i m '� J o w w ~ �w 1^ o <� z ~ 5 m° " " "23-a i'8o�o o wo�u" _ e W < ww i w w< gg a ° ax J w LL �i ig yNs "aw�w Fu U' - w wo '6 N u 5a w w� x=w 8 a�, oR R0: `a rc iw N xe se o,-- w v0 ~�o �o-wzv�0 W of mak' z� ff i $ " eve a eW o °m 29 ,av��x w' N a; °�` rc�i� °mow °¢ J ° g s $,g ° s ° o a`~'a w�n a' �N Hodes m �� ° °iy m "a 26 W w� "o a" a > - < iLL ma Y =w m°ate - o w" w uHrci w <w 5a i o i �� Fwa Z syii'm Qzwuooi O -w °o o� x $ o w v do w �W ,",a,°, oh o uN �� °""of S "°� o" � ho og xHo Z zo"N� oe�z po Qo ave U� w� w>� - Y00 xw .�¢=0V 'U Z �O �x a '' i LLO m zw -a $� uw� ave o� $� xia u os=a $ %% sw wai Q a`u "s LL" ao h <� u 1 rc3 -" m ao aLLs ° e. "s eo w aLL an =5 sw w° - i-" a a J aaa�Fi } 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 O O 0® 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a W p R W ooio$�� oo��=moo Y � aoo ao�a=aoz�3""o <" " =oaav a w�N a �aml• o _cawnH Rv volmoawa vvo vona:Ho.Haa v =rvy v valve, ,aao,awi pva yo a „aa9•,aea,a a v>!v ,a, ,. maa o .w ,ol 'Na 0 atul cl 'eay.,ee ya wewruyaui u Q ca U O W I1_ 2 j, I 1 w t; k W z � y 1� w - HNNHHNi� I 11i �III1TR Irt(1!'? � , HHHNNHIIN � I NHNHHHMN3 HHHH"Hi" / •t 11 IILLLLI'. jx Z ppp! wFy (3� Lul o t 111 l_ 3 y� J 'Jz "1nEti S z00 U 9 � zF�y�x x N vv,z �n $J� a �n g z k'° )N Y ip$ N �g m " ��+W3 �wa °e <oapsa 8 z o mw ale p 4 s s w w° $ x¢Sww u e omww Z - i m '� J o w w ~ �w 1^ o <� z ~ 5 m° " " "23-a i'8o�o o wo�u" _ e W < ww i w w< gg a ° ax J w LL �i ig yNs "aw�w Fu U' - w wo '6 N u 5a w w� x=w 8 a�, oR R0: `a rc iw N xe se o,-- w v0 ~�o �o-wzv�0 W of mak' z� ff i $ " eve a eW o °m 29 ,av��x w' N a; °�` rc�i� °mow °¢ J ° g s $,g ° s ° o a`~'a w�n a' �N Hodes m �� ° °iy m "a 26 W w� "o a" a > - < iLL ma Y =w m°ate - o w" w uHrci w <w 5a i o i �� Fwa Z syii'm Qzwuooi O -w °o o� x $ o w v do w �W ,",a,°, oh o uN �� °""of S "°� o" � ho og xHo Z zo"N� oe�z po Qo ave U� w� w>� - Y00 xw .�¢=0V 'U Z �O �x a '' i LLO m zw -a $� uw� ave o� $� xia u os=a $ %% sw wai Q a`u "s LL" ao h <� u 1 rc3 -" m ao aLLs ° e. "s eo w aLL an =5 sw w° - i-" a a J aaa�Fi } 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 O O 0® 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a W p R W ooio$�� oo��=moo Y � aoo ao�a=aoz�3""o <" " =oaav a w�N a �aml• o _cawnH Rv volmoawa vvo vona:Ho.Haa v =rvy v valve, ,aao,awi pva yo a „aa9•,aea,a a v>!v ,a, ,. maa o .w ,ol 'Na 0 atul cl 'eay.,ee ya wewruyaui u Q ca U O W I1_ 2 MIN. 10' 8"1 CONC. 8" BOULEVARD SUB BOULEVARD i- 10' RAD. COMMERCIAL �- EXPANSION JOINT CENTER CONTROL JOINTS TO ExP%'+',_;I(;N JOfdl BE USED ONLY ON DRIVES WITH SIDEWALK SAWCUT AND PATCH OVER 12' IN WIDTH WITH BIT. WEAR PATCH MIX. THICKNESS SCHEDULE (2 TYPICAL. ) END APRON A END OF RADIUS 1 r. GO "I 8" THICK CONCRETE. 6' COMPACTED GRANULAR BASE. WITHOUT SIDEWALK no SqF SOCEEF OfTAE c Nor rFaT �\������-eA6 ears rurs uo ew9a+i P - rum omRaY s[QtlF0. - .. Au neem twRTCK1 v PGrr arNA x W -P• �xE I. ua xJAIFAM M/IT -I `AAA t Ax IANS O Z �� YYlm�reU WMTx BURY _T— e AMAW+r aaTa am Aw WAAIDQ C—C Wr W M6i �1Y Y-1 POST Yaw Far TWEE T. NVAS SIGN INSTALLATION DETAIL 1 I INA l0'J J+.:IDIS NOTE: CONCRETE CURB TO BE ExP%'+',_;I(;N JOfdl CONCRETE POURED INTEGRAL WITH MAX. 5% CROSS HO .._F!3 LENGIH THICKNESS SCHEDULE SLOPE• 1 r. DRIVEWAY I THICKNESSI AREAS COMMERCIAL a' APRON,BLV. SLAB, SIDE- SPECIFICATION WALK. CONCRETE TO BE MnDOT 3A32 MIX DESIGN WITH 111 I'1N.t 6% t 1% AIR CONTENT. I �Q LOUIS Park (;(f IF/C; IDV PDATEH PL TE ®SL. MINNESOTA COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY I I I 111 /23/2014 ST -2 ENGINEERING no SqF SOCEEF OfTAE c Nor rFaT �\������-eA6 ears rurs uo ew9a+i P - rum omRaY s[QtlF0. - .. Au neem twRTCK1 v PGrr arNA x W -P• �xE I. ua xJAIFAM M/IT -I `AAA t Ax IANS O Z �� YYlm�reU WMTx BURY _T— e AMAW+r aaTa am Aw WAAIDQ C—C Wr W M6i �1Y Y-1 POST Yaw Far TWEE T. NVAS SIGN INSTALLATION DETAIL 1 I INA l0'J J+.:IDIS ,I � ExP%'+',_;I(;N JOfdl F CN-I:UA.ItY JI E;' HO .._F!3 LENGIH VCR TC FT. 1 r. t 111 I'1N.t I �Q `1(J. o HES-P IE & (;(f IF/C; IDV L' J. INTS I 1 I I 1 I III I I I 111 THRU (;'LTTER \� 7"` a_j 3 OF i YI SII 11 7r 1 L PISS n fiTR anVaky OV -SM -050 'A CA BURY arASWn PO4T TYPIC YaMTrw IWta1 YY -C %x � RaM oKv.WaQ PK -s�IDY>� M4T AM r Aa.0 Pear MGurIQa FOx sMAST LIMO ///SL Louis Park PUBLISH,, PATE LATE /// MINNESOTA SIGN INSTALLATION DETAIL ENGINEERING 1/23/2014 M-1 5" CONCRETE a PROVIDE DOWELS BETWEEN PAVEMENT SECTIONS ..............:..... - _ 4" MNDOT SPEC 3138 ................. CL. CL. 5 AGGREGATE BASE APPROVED SUBGRADE I 1=1 I... I-1 I )7 naaYaro.ulr,e:,� �L��y,y� I hae � ceNN Lhalhizpbr. �edlb[br, oma�rt Mns 4"gazed by mea under mFdYWQ xapery Ynr. dlHzti amaduly N¢n dhvksfbtal Ert/wnr LIGHT DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENTH`Q�Wz SEE GEOTECH REPORT �Virr7-1"'—'• A�w.Nw E� ENP,- 1.5" OF MNDOT SPEC 2360 BITUMINOUS w.,nFEr,n Lorna NA�er. Oi44L9 WEARING COURSE SPWEB2408 +kae E4, 1011 RQM MnDOT SPEC. 2357 TACK COAT 1.5•' OF MNDOT SPEC 2360 BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE SPWEB2408 6" MNDOT SPEC 3138 CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE COURSE APPROVED SUBGRADE LIGHT DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SEE GEOTECH REPORT I [tag ANO GUTTER — t A. ALRIT i MRANTS 2 DINT—TAN I 9 9 0, O iPAVED 4IK 1 WIVATE 1 A fK aM.N ALLET AAM( N tVAIE ; i -ADL AAIx �� pRMaAT ALx i PLAN ORIS Pi,/FT.Id/t6° PCP Fi.I TYPUAI® OWARD P AMAY P I 1­011.JOINT i 'iWARED E10 •' TVP. i ..:.. • SOX— Mm YI_E 10EOBNCuiTCR y �y i xiS� VARIABLE WIDTH® .I SECTION THRU WALK t ` CONCRETE WALK O < DL MLLE P NOTES. I� Q ENTMNCE SEE 110A0 DESIGN YANAL, CHAPTER S POP 411P t OfOMET— DESIGN OF ENTRANCES. A- p­ M WX. ALLOYABLE ENTRANCE IMADID,NT Ay Y EACEEOF0. OLF TO THE POSITION OF EEESTIM MALA. THE WALK LOLL DE IEJOVED AND ,( A PEVLACEO. M THE PAVELIENT aARPEO TOP 1.1 60'10 INP THE REOUOYED ENTRANCE SLOPE. SFE PLANS FOP PLACEMENT OF .ALE Aro •s s +N°� do ; ' DtMENSIDNs FOR caxsTMznON OF DPI..... +SII,J,p AOx NO DEDUCTION 'HALL PE MAGE IN LIMB l CUTTER J >yT FOR ENTRANCE. VAPIABLE ( 1/2 IK—A... JOINT. VZ DA PATI NNED JOML te✓ _ _ FLLER YATERIAL.AASHtO N 20 aEa11RE0 - A ' '' 2 CEMOFEM AREAS ARE POURED SEPAR1TEL11 HALF PLAN PERSPECTIVE O 1/2 IAL EEPAKION JOINTS AT 60 FT. I—— MA— MA— INTERVALS Q YATCN INPLACE ORt—AY TWEANESS a SIA U. Q OUNOUT -*ALK. PAVE ONLY TO THE END OF NIVEYAY PAVEMENT CWB NE NN WHEN ENTRANCE IS NAFFACEO OR LENGTx VARIES CaSTMCTiQN 1S NOT —DED IMF— TNI' POINY. ® 50 0. SWENKx. PAYE 1. iK RACE OF SUCYALF. VA" A. �� T.41K !- P N 1. AS —REtE dUKYAT PAVEAENf. 2Wx�j�1/E" K © CdItRAIN JOINT T KWI ED 0' AE x o.oc Fr./FT. ROPE - - - - - - - O SEPANSICH JOINT NOT �aJMEO EF ADJACENT sccnoHs ARE PDu1ED MauLtrwcALLr. SEE SEE SEE PLN A -A. p PLANS POR PLACEMExT OF PEO. CURB pAV. I O ROA.MATUT SE ARREE MINT CWA%6N A ­TE A.— IS FT. KTICEN JODRSI. SECTION A -A ® Nc nuwr ON,— A. QweSTM . O EAR a OF A —ST.. A -SS AOUTE ' eE CURB RETURN AD , ® SEE PUNS TOR MOF— CHOSE %NE OF 1. PEOE'TATNV ACCE'5 R TE,Y WY tul EECEEO OA2 FT./FT. AS COMiRUC APPROVED JULY 26_2011 STATE OF MINVESOTA SPECIFICATION STANDARD DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION REFERENCE PLATE CONCRETE WALK & No. sTAtE DEsuH� CURB RETURNS AT ENTRANCES szw 1 7035N 6" CONCRETE PROVIDE DOWELS BETWEEN PAVEMENT SECTIONS 4" MNDOT SPEC 3138 CL. 5 AGGREGATE BASE APPROVED SUBGRADE HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT SEE GEOTECH REPORT 1.5" OF MNDOT SPEC 2360 BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE SPWEB2408 MnDOT SPEC. 2357 TACK COAT 2" OF MNDOT SPEC 2360 BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE SPWEB2408 6" MNDOT SPEC 3138 CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE COURSE APPROVED SUBGRADE HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SEE GEOTECH REPORT B NOTE: PROVIDE 1/2" EXPANSION JOINT BETWEEN SIDEWALK AND ALL FIXED OBJECTS q A 1 /2' RADIUS TOOLED JOINT OR B PLAN VIEW 1- DEEP SAWED JOINT (TYP.) SEE SITE PLAN 1/4" THICKNESS PREMOI.DED EXPANSION JOINT FILLER SPACED ® 35' O.C. MAX. SLOPE 1/4" /FT. EXTEND JOINT FILLER FULL DEPTH OF SIDEWALK 2' MAX Tom) 2` r 5.0' 5.0' 5.0' + 5.0' S.0' 5.0' 5 0 + (TYR) `i TY2P) 4 J �Tfipf ` PC CONCRETE NO (T ) WHERE REQUIRED REINFORCEMENT o VP(TYR) WILL BE No. 3 BARS 24" O.C. 4" AGGREGATE BASE EACH WAY MAX. SPACING, OR COURSE COMPACTED TO SECTION B -B SECTION A- A 6 x 6 - 01.4 X W1.4 WWF 90% STD. PROCTOR (TYP) CONCRETE SIDEWALK DETAIL CZ G r LU J QJ LU i J Z Q Y LU H QLU 0 0 p J U) EC Z 0- J LU (n 0 U � 0 J H DATE 02/02/2015 PROJECT NO. 160755001 6042 u ' 0 O nZZ mA ` W D Z �'OTti yD m n m -1n Is, G� i y r m 00 SAN V ) i f .,�e f SO N0B / 4 8 • - F OZ N 0 000000 O O:,a>a� - n IE z Z a�^ oNF este $zm 1r g�€aye as moo 1 m H1 a a 11 N ., NY> > tic LO V N a£ H oo vHul Ni tiA s W O Ln U7 z 0 $ n ilk Al mV RVA g IF S. 45; Gy §�m �o 'M- $� G a14 Go �€ fig_ P ��•o m m a m� A =a €s m� 6 $�" i _' 8 < O J � G � a 'u"•� O _xa-x.a.E vmr>ce 0 O__ $ aha m 0- r C --1 a o € d A m o p A � p OK 4 Nm y Z L% Omlit ^ r O c O n i a uuel.c sum.oc z '"o g O v > D �➢ {i OO 0 ____ Q p� �p r pS m yO CID Y 1 N Q © O ®'moi G 0. s Is AF A z R s E a * >_ - ' 9 a a xx =fig ' �" € --4m€_� P .ate Ag s a ` o m $ egs Aa;9 QUA T1,4 Hs" � � ^�g� o e w n n $ " tine GA cn '1 ' ��g R� o Flo $R Ln N u am Kq �A a sg w e o o yy_ LC s LCALL DESIGN ENGINEER: m C)CENTRAL PARK WEST SITE PLAN DESIGNED BY LUCAS C. PAYNE Kim ey>>> Horn 00 10 ytQ ST. LOUIS PARK/GOLDEN VALLEY, MN DRAWN BY MLS MN LICENSE NUMBER o o DLC RESIDENTIAL DETAILS 2550 UNIVERSITY AVE wesr, sunE 238N W W O CHECKED BY 46785 RHON EA851 MN 5511197 WDM DATE: 02/02/2015 WWW.KIMLEY-645 RVA g S. Gy §�m �o 'M- $� G a14 �€ P m^ R>•A i'M a"= a m m a m� =a €s 6 $�" i _' 8 < O J � G � a 'u"•� O _xa-x.a.E vmr>ce 0 O__ $ aha m 0- r C --1 a o € d A m o p A � p OK 4 Nm y Z L% Omlit ^ r O c O n i a uuel.c sum.oc z '"o g O v > D �➢ {i OO 0 ____ Q p� �p r pS m yO CID Y 1 N Q © O ®'moi G 0. s Is AF A z R s E a * >_ - ' 9 a a xx =fig ' �" € --4m€_� P .ate Ag s a ` o m $ egs Aa;9 QUA T1,4 Hs" � � ^�g� o e w n n $ " tine GA cn '1 ' ��g R� o Flo $R Ln N u am Kq �A a sg w e o o yy_ LC s LCALL DESIGN ENGINEER: m C)CENTRAL PARK WEST SITE PLAN DESIGNED BY LUCAS C. PAYNE Kim ey>>> Horn 00 10 ytQ ST. LOUIS PARK/GOLDEN VALLEY, MN DRAWN BY MLS MN LICENSE NUMBER o o DLC RESIDENTIAL DETAILS 2550 UNIVERSITY AVE wesr, sunE 238N W W O CHECKED BY 46785 RHON EA851 MN 5511197 WDM DATE: 02/02/2015 WWW.KIMLEY-645 rvoD'NaoH-A3�nlxxmm S L z/ZO/Z0:3144 �n L6 L4 -969-L99 :3NOHd WaM 4LLSS NYL 'In d '1S AB 03ND3HD O Z S8L9b IVUN3a1S32i 014 z 0 d N8£Z 31x15 '1S3M 3ntl AlISa3AIND OSSZ In D a3BWNN 3SN3DIl NA SSW N / Ae NMvaD �, I NW ',k3T1VA N3a1005Q:1Vd sinm '1S oN w p UJ�H //� /��I�'� 3NAVd SV�n] MW8A9 U3NDIS3O wCD `` /` Nb'�d SUIS 1s3M112iVd �tf2ilN30 0 N :833NIQNI NOI530 31VDS �s p= oo 3( ���X < z rzi"' a LL „e wee LLJ €k# z �_ ���� �� z o Z ( a € � Q n €€ a W U' a C9 m (!1 (n i W Z s„ U1 O 15 ®i p (nC9 w zd 'y m z a s p o (n LLIN uj (() Y Z H A1� d `g `� °SNR Q Q an O =yaw O �g tlww Z 3saa Y ma it wNo W Z W � ., ra �• boa ' Q � e� � J (1D z � W ZW 3� Z_ J g” F— LL, 4 LL g L 1 z N C7 da LLI La Zbe �Z } a az Z� Q Qaw rm 1 ?=og¢ OYg QI.�J dJp ° c� p W p O LL Ln E`'" W r. r > Z Q ao < � wm o aLLJ W �F of o o M t�-1 07 PW of d � � � "¢ o @ n� 3 &�'� ��s g � Awa ao 0 Ln g g Amo o § e s tqs os s w o sy � � "¢ � "<6� "a g ri- _�g g m s x Q gt;g g k` N� xpe bgg ,j` 4$ o< a €s sc �g� g w N � a�S a age �: w W x (���€o'�' a� io .. d - tl: 3 4 5 g`s �� « 9 .8 s aw $s s is,-a"� R AW= Zr^fw ` W,2, g y o 1 n W g=" :a==¢�9��rg gSg` '"�: roas o T in igzg � ; aso"W ssg l"J* JgggW Wg 19S 8€ ^ g oma g e �€a � ggaa am��.a go gs o � -' c� m ' � 'a m g g �� � a �� goy W � $q OB ® O � C➢ � � <g � it I ea Y= m o O ? v N � a pg � i U z V � §$: yllrly"• N1WY 1N9r3lyd at 0 CD w w o�w o?W _ i/ 0 L !^ 1. I. �W 3Z 4Z-141 I t E3N 2 < W O xxll) L-�I —: w K�; WU moo" opo�a s_P1r Fig � - egg -3N> Ln dddao e3soo 0 - "YY� �o ? WV '-+< St nb O -� 12 YW 10 rnl 53 < - •• 1319YIHan NOISNFIG I 13)Batxtlr �l5*+Atl(1_� NOISN3xl(1 � � YII I�a ' w e z�nx 3cc3 oxavav t �Ev+ na) oxa+sv a ..• nc3 a»a+a)a - y¢ aiolaozay puo wo aIwIN ai wIN R9 uolloieopo puo ua °]34M +^� w1 puo to ac-p-d ­d °e ;p 3° aeaitl zu6lwp pu Nie6o1 'ivawnaop sl r _ w �4 01 DRAINAGE&_ �..�. m_,.:...-- i Y ..-.. ( i 14� Li, SD -1 UTICA AVENUE — --X%%X---- EXISTING CONTOUR Xi0xxzx0I � EXISTING CURB ANDGUTTER UTILITY EASEMENT EXISTING BUILDING PROPOSED STORM SEWER PIPE EXISTING STORMSEWER PIPE ® PROPOSED MANHOLE ■ PROPOSED CURB/AREA INLET rr _ _ Yom... ' "='>� _. _ _ "_ , �w... 1 H SD -12 sD-4 SO -1A I 1.4hrh ,29+jo ~� DRAINAGE& UTILITY F n° STORMWATER I TREATMENT EASEMENT ( I .:EASEMENT ❑ ❑ SD -1B SD -2 n I PROPOSED -- - DRAINAGE& -vnury EASEMENT OUTLOT A - OFFICE UNDERGROUND DETENTION -' '- DRAINAGe& ❑ ❑ o ' PHASE 2 .... 6°- UTILITY EASEMENT z FFE=888.50 PROPOSED UNDERGROUND ( :/ E a CISTERN OUTLOT A - OFFICE "'`� ❑ S PHASE 1 B4% .... FFE=885.50 _ u LOT 1 - RESIDENTIAL e a PHASE 1 o 210 FFE=882.00 s I I I ° z I I 3.5i I c° 1. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CTTYOFGCLDEN VALLEY AND ST. LOUIS PARK SPECIFICATION SAND BUILDINGPERMRREQUIREMENTS.WORK WITHIN WAYZATA BOULEVARD WILL REQUIREAMNDOT ROWARTLRYPERMIT. ° 2. CONTRACTOR TO CALL "GOPHER STATE ONE CALVATLEASTTWO WORWNG DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATIONICONSTRUCTION FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, TWIN CITIES METRO AREA: 851-451 IXX12 OR TOLL FREE: 1406252-1165 a 3. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OR EXISTING UTILITIES NO TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO THE STARTOFSNE GRADING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER OFANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS. 4. SUBGRADE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER EXCAVATIONTO HELP OFFSET ANY STABILITY PROBLEMS DUE TO WATER SEEPAGE OR STEEP SLOPES. WHEN PLACING NEW SURFACE MATE RIALADJACENTTOE%ISTINGPAVEMENr,THE E%LAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED PROMPTLY TO AVOID UNDERMINING OF EXISTING PAVEMENT. 0 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL HORIZONTALANDVERTICALCONTROL u 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL EXCAVATE DRAINAGE TRENCHES TO FOLLOW PROPOSED STORM SEWER ALIGNMENTS. 8 T. GRADES SHOWN ARE FINISHED GRADES. CON TRACTOR SHALL ROUGH GRADE TO SUBGRADE ELEVATION, LEAVE STREET READY FOR SUBBASE. . 8. ALL EXCESS MATERIAL, BITUMINOUS SURFACING, CONCRETE ITEMS, ANY ABANDONED ` UTILITY ITEMS, AND OTHER UNSTABLE MATERIALS SHALL BECOMETHE PROPERTYOF THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE DISPOSED OFOFF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE `0 9. REFER TO THE UTILITY PIAN FOR SANITARY SEWER MAIN, WATER MAIN SERVICE LAYOUT AND ELEVATIONS AND CASTING I STRUCTURE SCHEDULE. e 10. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PAVEMENTS AND CURB AND GUTTER WITH SMOOTH UNIFORM SLOPES WITH PROVIDEPOSNIVE DRAINAGE. 3 $ 11. INSTALL A MINIMUM OF 4"MNDOT CLASS SAGGREGATE BASE UNDER CURB AND – GUTTER. S 12. HAUL ROUTE SHALL BE WAv2AYTA BOULEVARD AND GAMBLE DRIVE TO PARK PLACE BOULEVARD TO HIGHWAY3M.. 13. UPON COMPLETION OF EXCAVATION AND FILLING, CONTRACTORSHALLRESTOREALL E STREETS AND DISTURBED AREAS ON SITE. ALLDISTURBEDAREASSHALLBE RE -VEGETATED WITH CITY APPROVED GROUND COVER. S 14. CONTRACTOR IS TO PLACE ALL MANHOLES OUTSIOEOFDRVING IE LEGEND — — PROPERTY UNE CITYUMIr UNE — —XXXX— — --X%%X---- EXISTING CONTOUR Xi0xxzx0I PROPOSED CONTOUR EXISTING CURB ANDGUTTER EXISTING BUILDING PROPOSED STORM SEWER PIPE EXISTING STORMSEWER PIPE ® PROPOSED MANHOLE ■ PROPOSED CURB/AREA INLET 1 – 1 I , DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT Z6� _ i LOT - HOTEL FFE=882.00 rx lb t PROPOSED SIPHONIC MANHOLE ALERT TO CONTRACTOR: Z xx%x PROPOSED SLOPE 1. THE PRESENCE OF GROUNDWATER SHOULD BE ANTICIPATED ON THIS PROJECT. CONTRACTORS BID Q SHALL INCLUDE CONSIDERATION FOR THIS ISSUE. WHEN PERFORMING GRADING OPERATIONS .ZJ PROPOSED STORM SEWER STRUCTURE DURING PERIODS OF WET WEATHER, PROVIDE ADEQUATE DEWATERING, DRAINAGE AND GROUND = cQ&1 NAME WATERMANAGEMENT TO CONTROL MOISTURE OF SOILS. REFERTOMASTERSITESPECIFICATIONS. E EMERGENCY OVERFLOW ELEVATION ALL CONTRACTORS MUST CONTACT 2. ALL GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED(EARTHWORK, FINAL U UTIES, AND FINAL GOPHER STATE CALL ONE GRADING) BY THE MILESTONE DATE IN PROJECT DOCUMENTS. OUTUOTAREATO BE KEPT FREE OF FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION MN TOLL FREE 1-800-252-1166 JOB TRAILERS AND STORAGE AFTER THE CONTRACT MILESTONE DATE FOR THE OUTLOT.GENERAL FFE CONTRACTORTO PROVIDE CLEAR ACCESS FOR OUTLOT COINTRACTORTO THE SPECIFIC PARCEL AT BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS ALL TIMES AFTER MILESTONE DATE. PURCHASER OF OUTLOTTOPROVIDE PERMNOCCUMENTS AND GRAPHIC SCALE N FEET FUTURE UNDERGROUND STORMWATER TREATMENT RESERVE TWIN CITY AREA 651-454-0002 SWPPP REQUIRED BYSTATE/LOCALREOUIREMENTSFORSPECIFICOU T. O 25 50 1 AREA two" z m � L 3 i V o a T 0 1 g O N � v N � o - � Q J p � � 3 m J 06 J J � � Lr - Lu Z W Q OLu Z C� I� CZ G J F- J Q %n � w Lu 1 ❑ Z QJ W a- < O ❑ J (n YLu Z a w u ❑ U � 0 J U) DATE 02/02/2015 PROJECT NO. 160755001 Op SHEET NUMBER 6050 0 GRADING NOTES 1, ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WEDRTHECITYOFGOLDEN VALLEY AND ST. LOUIS PARKSPECI FICATIONS AND BUILDING PERMITREQUIREMENTS. WORK WITHIN WAYZATA BOULEVARD WILL REQUIREAMNDOTROWATI11- Y PERMIT. 2, CONTRACTOR TO CALL"GOPHER STATE ONE CALL-ATUEASTTWOWORWNG DAYS p PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS. TWIN CINES METRO v AREA: 651-454-OD02 OR TOLL FREE: 1dOD23-1186 ° 3. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OR EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TOTHE STARTOFSIEEGRADING.THE CON TRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER OFANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS. x 4. SUBGRADE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED IM ATERSEE AG EO EXCAVATIONTO ES HELP OFFSET ANY STABILITY PROBLEMS ADTOWATER SEEPAGEORSTEEP SLOPES. _ WHEN PLACING NEW SURFACE MATERIAL AOJACENTTO EXISTING PAVEMENT, THE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED PROMPTLY TO AVOID UNDERMINING OF EXISTING PAVEMENT. 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL HORIZONTAL ANO VERTICALCONTROL n° 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL EXCAVATE DRAINAGE TRENCHES TO FOLLOW PROPOSED STORM SEWER ALIGNMENTS. S 7 GRADES SHOWN ARE ION,FINISHED STREET READY FOR SUBBASERSH ROUGH GRADETO SUBGRADE ELEVATION, LEAVE STREET READY FOR SUBBASE. S ALL EXCESS MATERIAL, BITUMINOUS SURFACING, CONCRETE ITEMS, ANY ABANDONED UTILITY ITEMS, AND OTHER UNSTABLE MATERIALS SLL HABECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. `0 9. REFERTOTHE UTILITYPIAN FOR SAN ITARYSEWERMAIN,WATERMAINSERVICE E LAYOUT AND ELEVATIONS AND CASTING/ STRUCTURE SCHEDULE. 10. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PAVEMENTS AND CURB AND E GUTTER WITH SMOOTH UNIFORM SLOPES WITH PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE. 11 INSTALL A MINIMUM OF 4" MNDOT CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE UNDER CURB AND GUTTER. 12 HAUL ROUTE SHALL BE WAYZAYTA BOULEVARD ANDGAMBLE DRIVE TOPARKPLACE BOULEVARD TO HIGHWAY 301. 13 UPON COMPLETION OF EXCAVATION AND FILLING, CONTRACTORSHALL RESTORE ALL STREETS AND DISTURBED AREAS ON SITE. ALLDGTURBEDAREASSHALLBE RE -VEGETATED WITH CITY APPROVED GROUND COVER. ° 14 CONTRACTOR IS TO P LACE ALL MAN HOLES OUTSIDE OF DRIVING LANES. DRAINAGE SCHEDULE . ®®1111111111.111■® N®m®®' m LEGEND - - - PROPERTY LINE CITY UMT LINE -x.xXXXX- -- i — ® _ EXISTING CONTOUR 70001 PROPOSED CONTOUR XXXX UNDERGROUND STORMTECH - - _ EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER INS: 871.20 I EXISTING BUILONG PROPOSED STORM SEWER PIPE I EXISTING STORM SEWERPIPE - - - - - - - PROPOSEDGRADING FIDGELINE/SWALE ® PROPOSED MANO-E ■ PROPOSEOCURB/AREA N1ET ' PROPOSED SIPHONIC MANGLE x.xx% PROPOSEDSLOPE FC9 171 PROPOSED STORM SEWER STRUCTURE LABEL EOF xxxx EMERGENCY OVERFLOW ELEVATION FFE FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION TC TOP OF CURB FL CURB FLOW UNE HP HIGH POINT HP xxxx- LOW POW vw.eneen <vrn HAWK ...`.4.....� .. - _.._ INV.67328 - _ ra i : m2.m BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS I CONNECTTCP I OUTFALL FROM m UNDERGROUND STORMTECH UNDERGROUND STORMTECH -� INV: 873.57 CONNECT TO INS: 871.20 I SID12SD-1A j I t � TREAIRENTTI UDETRRNNOO m EASEMENT OVERFLOW TO STORMTECH INV:873.00 SD3 ' &TONE INV: 887.25 STORMTECH INV: 871.12 ---- LMCA M EN -U& - J SEE DETAIL SHEET 10' DRAINAGES i 1 ti REFERENCE UTICAAVENUE IMPROVEMENTPI,ANS 4j - CONNECTTO� � ---_ CONNECT TO OONERF DRAIN - EXISTING 2Y _. EXI: NG 21• _ _ EXISTING IO• ,' - .CONNECTION - 9TORM` _ STORM f STORM_ INV:370.47 i -' INV:6T8.5/ INV: 87196 r INV: 370.39 I f DRAINAGE &tif❑ ' BTORM Ina.19 _--�"^ .. B SD-1 t� _ ...., _ _ ._.. _... ' -UTILITY EASEMENT ...`.4.....� .. - _.._ INV.67328 - _ / : m2.m BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS I CONNECTTCP I OUTFALL FROM m UNDERGROUND STORMTECH UNDERGROUND STORMTECH -� INV: 873.57 CONNECT TO INS: 871.20 I SID12SD-1A ATERL I , � TREAIRENTTI UDETRRNNOO m EASEMENT OVERFLOW TO STORMTECH INV:873.00 SD3 ' &TONE INV: 887.25 STORMTECH INV: 871.12 ---- / SEE DETAIL SHEET 10' DRAINAGES i 1 ' 1 , 174 11�� DPoTERINGR DRAINAGE S WET DURING PERIODS OF WET WEATHER, PROVIDE ADEQUATE DEWATERING, DRAINAGE AND GROUND CONNECTTO UNDERGROUND L�eazm I WATER MANAGEMENT TO CONTROL MOISTURE OF SOILS. REFER TO MASTER SITE SPECIFICATIONS. CISTERN INV. 888.19 I _ _CONTRACTORTOMATC14 PROPOSED GRADESOF ❑ 2. ALL GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED(EARTHWORK FINAL UNLITIES,AND FINAL " I f DRAINAGE &tif❑ ' UTILITY EASEMENT JOB TRAILERS AND STORAGE AFTER THE CONTRACT MILESTONE DATE FOR THE OUMOT. GENERAL ' -UTILITY EASEMENT tl--- SD -2A ...- ----- --- a UNDERGROUND j./ ' CISTERN mP f STONE INV 38)25 ROOF DRAIN RESIDENTIAL PHASE 2 CONNECTION INV:B]S0.5 CISTERN INV 888.00 m SEE DETAIL SHEET FFE=882.00 IS94° { { mIm { I I { I tt I I tt I S WALE @ MIN 07 - SLOPE 211Wb I I I I r I dee I I SWALE DIRECTED TOSD-7N �\ 0.5% SLOPE LIMITSOF ` cHADINN m � I I SDI -L7-- / : m2.m BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS I SD -13 I I OUTFALL FROM m UNDERGROUND STORMTECH 1.4 -� INV: 873.57 CONNECT TO ❑ �' UNDERGROUND STORMTECH INV: 871.20 , UNDERGROUND CISTERN m _ OVERFLOW TO STORMTECH INV:873.00 SD3 � � • ---- , SD -7 M'N. 0 %SLOPPE IN. D 5�Y- $ 10' DRAINAGES i 1 "• ---- - - , 174 11�� DPoTERINGR DRAINAGE S WET DURING PERIODS OF WET WEATHER, PROVIDE ADEQUATE DEWATERING, DRAINAGE AND GROUND CONNECTTO UNDERGROUND L�eazm I WATER MANAGEMENT TO CONTROL MOISTURE OF SOILS. REFER TO MASTER SITE SPECIFICATIONS. CISTERN INV. 888.19 I _ _CONTRACTORTOMATC14 PROPOSED GRADESOF ❑ 2. ALL GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED(EARTHWORK FINAL UNLITIES,AND FINAL " I f DRAINAGE &tif❑ _; --1P DRAINAGE& UTILITY EASEMENT JOB TRAILERS AND STORAGE AFTER THE CONTRACT MILESTONE DATE FOR THE OUMOT. GENERAL ' -UTILITY EASEMENT `m LOT 1 ...- ----- --- a RESIDENTIAL PHASE j./ ' FFE=882.00 mP ARCH. STORM DRAIN. REFER TO ARCH. PIANS FOR WOONERF STORM CONVEYANCE. '.� SITE KEY UVI'Mr-KtoIAIrtALLVIVt MN TOLL FREE 1-800-252-1166 / a Nrs BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS I / 1a• DRAINAGE& o, TWIN CITY AREA 651-454-0002 K,;-�. _ -� UTILITY EASEMENT 12 r f m _ a ALERT TO CONTRACTOR: ---- $ 10' DRAINAGES i 1 "• ---- - - , 3 ' DPoTERINGR DRAINAGE S WET DURING PERIODS OF WET WEATHER, PROVIDE ADEQUATE DEWATERING, DRAINAGE AND GROUND UTILITY EASEMENT WATER MANAGEMENT TO CONTROL MOISTURE OF SOILS. REFER TO MASTER SITE SPECIFICATIONS. I _ _CONTRACTORTOMATC14 PROPOSED GRADESOF m 2. ALL GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED(EARTHWORK FINAL UNLITIES,AND FINAL " UTICA AVENUEiy IMPROVEMENT PLANS(TYP.) - `-- '' GRADING) BY THE MILESTONE DATE IN PROJECT DOCUMENTS. OUTLOT AREA TO BE KEPT FREE OF --' _; --1P DRAINAGE& x JOB TRAILERS AND STORAGE AFTER THE CONTRACT MILESTONE DATE FOR THE OUMOT. GENERAL ' -UTILITY EASEMENT `m CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE CLEAR ACCESS FOR OUTLOT CONTRACTOR TO THE SPECIFIC PARCEL AT ALL TIMES AFTER MILESTONE DATE. PURCHASER OF OUTLOT TO PROVIDE PERMIT DOCUMENTS AND ...- ----- --- a SWPPP REQUIRED BY STATE/LOCAL REQUIREMENTS FORSPECIFICOUTLOT - -- - - - �D -s sDmz m LOT 2 ROOF DRAIN RESIDENTIAL PHASE 2 CONNECTION INV:B]S0.5 O ry FFE=882.00 IS94° ^� '.� SITE KEY UVI'Mr-KtoIAIrtALLVIVt MN TOLL FREE 1-800-252-1166 / a Nrs BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS I / 1a• DRAINAGE& o, TWIN CITY AREA 651-454-0002 K,;-�. _ -� UTILITY EASEMENT m _ a ALERT TO CONTRACTOR: ---- $ 1. THEPRESENCE OF GROUNDWATER SHOULD BE WHENPEDONTHISPROJECT.CERATIOTOR'S BID DURININCLUDE OF CONSIDERATION THISISSUEADEQUATE "• ---- - - , 3 ' DPoTERINGR DRAINAGE S WET DURING PERIODS OF WET WEATHER, PROVIDE ADEQUATE DEWATERING, DRAINAGE AND GROUND WATER MANAGEMENT TO CONTROL MOISTURE OF SOILS. REFER TO MASTER SITE SPECIFICATIONS. m 2. ALL GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED(EARTHWORK FINAL UNLITIES,AND FINAL " o GRADING) BY THE MILESTONE DATE IN PROJECT DOCUMENTS. OUTLOT AREA TO BE KEPT FREE OF --' _; --1P DRAINAGE& - JOB TRAILERS AND STORAGE AFTER THE CONTRACT MILESTONE DATE FOR THE OUMOT. GENERAL ' -UTILITY EASEMENT `m CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE CLEAR ACCESS FOR OUTLOT CONTRACTOR TO THE SPECIFIC PARCEL AT ALL TIMES AFTER MILESTONE DATE. PURCHASER OF OUTLOT TO PROVIDE PERMIT DOCUMENTS AND --"` ... --- ----- --- a SWPPP REQUIRED BY STATE/LOCAL REQUIREMENTS FORSPECIFICOUTLOT - I m I u m 9.1 Ui Z _ Ln r O m 00 \ O CD MIN , SLOPE, m m LOT 3 / 10' DRAINAGE& HOTEL - SEE HEET6050 / - UTILITY EASEMENT J � 06 J (D W !/ z 2/`� / a_ z Lu _j U) U, \Q Lu /J z g sD-10 Y Lou a O o C7 — < Lu Z a v LU (n 0 U � z O o _ U) DATE 02/02/2015 PROJECT NO. GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 160755001 0 25 50 100 SHEET NUMBER 6051 CASTING PER CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK STANDARDS \ TOP OF WEIR = 875.80 ® V -NOTCH INV = 874.5( 18"RCP -®1.58% INV=873.33 12"W X 12"H ORIFI( INV=872.OI V -NOTCH INV = 87, 12"W X 1' IN = 882.18 -MINIMUM 2, MAXIMUM 4, 2" THICK CONCRETE ADJUSTING RINGS PRECAST MANHOLE SECTIONS q4 REBAR 12" O.C. EW CENTERED ON WEIR WITH 2' MINIMUM CLEARANCE TO FACE OF CONCRETE -21" RCP 0 1.00% IE = 872.00 21" OUT INV=872.00 SD -1 OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE NO SCALE Rv-EY_ORN n -C-S. INC. 3'-4" 2,_D« FRAME GRATE AND CURB BOX TO BE NE, FOUNDRY COMPANY -- - - NO. R-3067 WITH TYPE R GRATE OR 0 o a APPROVED EQUAL (USE TYPE L IF Toa < IN A HIGH FLOW AREA). A A I I "DRIVEWAY INLETS USE NEENAH R -3290-A OR APPROVED EQUAL. PLAN VIEW (MINUS GRATE) HDPE ADJUSTING RINGS MAY BE USED AS REQUIRED (MIN 2-2", MAX. 5-2" HEIGHT). LADTECH GLUE (PER INSTRUCTIONS) SHALL BE APPLIED BETWEEN EACH HDPE ADJUSTING RING. CONCRETE ADJUSTING RINGS MAY BE USED, MINIMUM I" MORTAR BETWEEN CASTING. CONCRETE ADJUSTING RINGS, AND STRUCTURE, MIN 4" AND MAX. 10" IN HEIGHT FOR CONCRETE ADJUSTMENT RINGS. (NON -SHRINKING GROUT REQ.). EXTERNAL SEAL SHALL BE INSTALLED IN CONJUNCTION WITH ADJUSTING RINGS AND CASTING ASSEMBLY. 0.2' SUMP CONCRETE COLLAR TO ENCASE CASTING AND RINGS. CURB MIX SHALL BE USED FOR CONCRETE 2 ADJUSTING RINGS (TYPICAL) COLLAR. i EXTERNAL SEAL f INSTALL INFI-SHEILD EXTERNAL SEAL `� f:. UNI-BAND(OR EQUAL). INSTALL INFI-SHEILD a UNI-BAND(OR EQUAL). > SLOPE BENCHES 2" PER FOOT. STRUCTURE TO BE PRECAST CONCRETE COLLAR TO ENCASE --MECHANICALLY COMPACT 4" STORM SEWER PIPE. CURB MIX SECTION A -A GRANULAR MATERIAL FOR SHALL BE USED FOR CONCRETE LEVELING (MN/DOT 3149.2F) COLLAR. (ORDINARY COMPACTION). UIEUS //1M1NESt. Louissorn TYPE 8 CATCH BASIN Park PDATEN PN'E /// ENGINEERING 1/23/201! SS -2 CONCRETE WEIR PLAN VIEW OR BA NOB4820J OR 4022A UNI-HANU(UK LUUAL) CASTING TO BE NEENAH FOUNDRY • SEE NOTE BELOW (MH SHOWN) ADJUSTMENT RINGS (MIN. 2, MAX. 3) EXTERNAL SEAL INSTALL INFI-SHIELD 27" GATOR WRAP(OR EQUAL) PRECAST REQUIRED UNLESS APPROVED BY ENGINEER. P aj"/FT .. 2" NOTE: 1. USE NEENAH CASTING NO. R-1733 WITH A SELF SEALING (0 -RING GASKET) ONE HOLE LID SECTION A -A NO. R-1733. UD SHALL READ: STORM SEWER, SEE SS -1. 2. FRAME, GRATE & CURB BOX DOGHOUSES TO BE GROUTED TO BE NEENAH FOUNDRY CO. W. OUTSIDE AND INSIDE. TOP OF R-3067 WITH TYPE V GRATE FOR BARRELL SECTION UNDER TOP LOW POINTS. SLAB TO HAVE FLAT TOP EDGE SEALED WITH 2 BEADS OF RAM-NEK OR APPROVED EQUAL. ///St. LOUIS Park PDALTEH PNO /O MINNE.TA TYPE (MANHOLE/CATCH BASIN 1/23/2014 ss -3 ENGINEERING 7/8" DopmD 0 0 TINT I�Ooac0o0oaop =O=D 0=30o0o0=p r DIA. LIFT HOLE 9-0= D 0 0 LUGS V-0-30 pnU qnU �3)STACKING 25 3/4" O 120' APART 0 -o=u=n�00 G= o Q o O0 o�aga0 0= o�a�a=a0 00000000000-00000 0 000= a a o o agog' 000000000000000 E n HIGH LETTERS RAISED FLUSH WITH Z r TOP SURFACE MACH. GROOVE IN UD SEAT FOR >)" DIA. POLYISOPRENE GASKET U � 40 DUROMETER �St LOUIS Park STORM SEWER � Q 0 DATER NO. Lw iNFERING PLATEN LID, LETTERED R-1733 1/23/2014 SS TO � + m v �'zvo zo ~a E n Z r � � U � N O - � Q 0 � o � m � 3 Z BACKFILL Q 06 12" OR 1/4 Bcf n U) .: (WHICHEVER IS GREATER) W J ... ....... z 12" MIN. rr nn Q V \ COMPACTED GRANULAR z 0 \ STORM \ ENCASEMENT f n Q \ SEWER \ COMPACTED GRANULAR V BEDDING Q i 1/4 Bc MIN. Z i\�j\�\i\,\\\�\\A� UNDISTURBED GROUND } w J NOTE: ALL PIPES SHALL BE BEDDED IN THE EXISTING POORLY GRADED F- J Q W > SANDS. SUBCUT BELOW PIPES A MINIMUM OF TFT AND BACKFILL J W Q WITH POORLY GRADED SANDS. Y PIPE BEDDING (CLASS B) a o 0 FOR RCP STORM SEWER0 co Z d U W (n ❑ U � 0 J F- V) DATE 02/02/2015 PROJECT NO. 160755001 SHEET NUMBER 6052 This aocumen 1, lagether with th. <o and designs P-- nere,n, as an ,nnrument of sernce ,s mtenaetl r 1M1 a one client Por -kh M1 w ee 1— at ons p P rN,once o e aa—t wIlh —p-i...P Ap�P . II . w,t «uP K, >- om Pie Aeeo<Ple., i�. ZO om 4 $ no " zm v -o € oo �� egg ��amA� $ mom $ $ L •'0 m 0g � 0 mm�� 1=o z mD ii m ° $� n TOm m ;oo��°"pJ__ ° m D Xm mm Iy O ' € ° Ovx ; i Q in % a ge D s_ g ,A Ao �y z a i 92 , i i " r- y-!TA g � fpm $v g - n �N �$�>m m m m o �b z� om 2 a s 3s o z 9�� R l g °3� 8N Am o P R a 1 > v "z b b O gam$ m opynT" $ 44a Z NOO Age $ W z p o '� < m-, l A off, € $ o-€ z z z" 8mmK 8 $m m $ gg m a �so eco mmn 'S 6 bg d o g 3 1; Az >� € b �° i E> G7 m D o < D D r > > € F Z D e M D 4 fie, m w8 X PA ..m g sg m ... TI $ �. y 4nmR p S g: rn U) ITI m ,F a y b� R ,; kP o Ail k b a m�o 7 ; > a ° roe - 'i 9 - $��512" a a co ffi m a fS m R $_ 3a�g� M LA 1 A; -"big F q $ 8 yayiN 4 a x m x p g o g 3 m m "o b m b o ff ewoTRUEMAN eEw REv oaw auc DEacRwTK>N CENTRAL PARK WEST "yn2 6-1 O m H- oar' °Hseb GOLDEN VALLEY, MINNESOTA - m r7i«���A4l�f o T" .. wow�a'mww�p o Cm 7 � p11aECTr esxrb cNECKEn: GFI = g �m - $$o>"KR F O<"� $$"°akFF OPnO:$=ice=°g°m-' .ko $raw gm� $» �a3sm Vim""m43>�"�"hfrsm Almm� bmm�� $_ € p°g>5 AAA WHO S$ a WIN., gg R, .°°s y �"m� m R mL _s N Y4oAD $y om� 5m£A"go m�pN3�S"m nLm $y `"'I ° �`°o =Ss m�zfs m mpoS �$Lm= ��b a z ebb 2,5 6, 5 �g m H m k A$ _ $gm m s°° s° sl € �H p _$ ?=g v 2p_ �oNXI m m m Ni $ n gra vs >� a ao $$o n m < HQ p �-'- nA oRcNo yo Ra ei ° £�€N zmmAa m €, o°sm m oo $�Eg �s� :�= m 4° 0.°m.s =R U4 �b "$ BMs assess;s x� sae ag_ �^ Z- > $ s m m ego ° 3 LA&�S g y 8 �o m1 m o,ffi;a 18 g g gN, o b w m� x %a� g p29 1c _ L � m -a E 4 3 zg m n _ $ $gj n — �, 0 ° £ 3 b s _�141, A > y g ° a o m-- „ n ° m o co0 � 2-0 g g ----- -- ----- s y m 2 22 H fl CNN < m °" o ap A!" sol €x p L' 1 Z y ego € a$m� $�-° s°m° ��; y a`$s. u', g g S €€m 9 -� mt;g €2 50> mm 5.s�$P#;g mw4s $mho-u $ gg 3� o`g� S-Am gyo ;gym; PIRMH qN '° 3p z m MIJIM 8 � 0 ° eeoo rpuErnAN Gtvo � HEV I- CHK DEsrnwrrc,N CENTRAL PARK WEST ry ,aoo-r6i4ai edam GOLDEN VALLEY, MINNESOTA ONN{ ......-. 4640 TRUEMAN DLVp REV DRW CHK DESCRIPTION 'T y }r ]V g0' Dn E8 13615 DRAWN. 9(R CENTRAL PARK WEST � HUARD. off 43oxb eoo Taa -rws � GOLDEN VALLEY, MINNESOTA rn """" �cT e. ednn CHECKED'. GFI 0. T „ •�. •-•. ,^ ._.. MTF ,-zs4s nRAvm PROJECT A'8621b DHEp4,D. 1: d7 SCALE DESIGN ENGINEER: A CENTRAL PARK WEST GRADING & DESIGNED BY Kimley>>> Horn v oo BMW LUCAS C. PAYNE lO z ND ST. LOUIS PARK/GOLDEN VALLEY, MN DRAINAGE PLAN DRAWN BY l c N� MLS MN LICENSE NUMBER 2550 UNIVERSITY AVE WEST, SUITE 238N W W o o O DLC RESIDENTIAL CHECKED BY 46785 ST. PAUL, MN 55114 A DETAILS WDM 0`2/02/201 rj PHONE: LE-HORN.CO7 DATE: WWW.KIMLE Y-HORN.COM m p gip$ Sm;t ��� ����� y <T' �N$� � m�n $g Mi � m$ s z >� pm��n �NS� � ee ag �g �m A" � €�~ z g� rayyy � �a z� $ bz my O n � ��� Op €�F�S�b mz ==p 7 $mc�.�o� ��p �� p v m � m$ >� pm��n �NS� � ee ag U � �a � Op N g $mc�.�o� ��p �� p v m c_ R� a� mz ?mac m0 yn > V400 V9-LS9 :3 QHd '31t/Q Sl Ivl�a SLOZ/ZO/ZO L6 L9-Sb9-lS9 �3NOHd NOM � d bLLSS NW 'lnvd '1SAB 03A33H3 O Q w NBCZ MMS 'IS 3M 3AV A11Sa3AINn oSSZ S8L9b WiN3GIS32J Oda o z o N38VInN 3SN3311 NW Slut , if] Ae wava0 Nb'y d A EM I{�``o^',Na Nw '.l3TWA N3IMOO/Ni Wd sino 1S oo � - _ 'o^ Ua�H (<<Aa��U�� 3NAdd Sd� MW9A8 03NOIS30 V �N la V `J V 0 w t3J 1S3MJi2itfd �b2ilN3O d33N10 N3 N'JIS30 37V05 �IYJ A31g3HAt��9[25B�K 1A3fOtld} tlM6 NMVaU St'9T-t 31W Z woe•++.n-+�+ Z LL VIOS3NNIW ',k3llVA N30100igloo O canceema. , 1S3M NNVd IVNIN30 Na1d1a�930 wn nwa n� OA3eY13M90 �{ m to - — �-_ m F "& �- x z o W oaf`$ cagyy p i :tuwN r,WW� ti U xwm ssyy o_ Q-W� k cYi 88�R g'85� �b � IM s i 12 �w3 m °� �m~7�� � S p � g �a rim � •5 r z� ° a 0 ° g W t\ A z w) B >"037p3NA otBlZSB <Yl°3lOtle tlM5 :NMWO SL-gi-t :31M �a awmxta _. LL VlOS31414I1fll'A3llVA NBmov 1S3M NNVd WbM30 aouma�s3a *,I Al.H,aa w�>rcv�w3 am�sH> n ick � _�� ggqiqq5 � # w 9a s 9T 3 >w § 0 -- � a m z o h t T -- — z q W �x 5 N,Nr, . o r 3trzl H, 0 9.% NEE z aom��g� -aLL 5 Fa<"«eammm m dame ywj � LEI 0 ^ m m z sryop- Puo Vllm Ow% tl Puo o,aw o to rua codmd o . a , c to wtl su6isaP Puo 1>601 a k s k a �'spyt I F r OUTLOTA- OFFICE 117 . UTICA AVENUE.,.,-__-. M ETFJERT AIN a �, tt LOT 1 - RESIDENTIAL PHASE 1 f _ FFE=882.00 - A o Nx x x CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK17 ry' CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY I ` 1o'oRAINADE& UT1LITv EASEMENT tti� Za O I� EXISTING SANITARY SEWER UFT I W v STATION u EXISTING ACCESS EASEMENT I I In _ 10' DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT LOT 2 - RESIDENTIAL PHASE 2 FFE=882.00 I / b LOT 3 - HOTEL FFE=880.00 / / I nnImo_ - � � . v -10' DRAINAGE 8 LU Q �� UTILITY EASEMENT ®\Ir u Ent ��LL��,=,�,�A�wn,.w�.��No -`o EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION FOR EXISTING UNDERGROUND VTILffV LOCATIONS. ilMN CITIES �� "' lov10'ORAINAGE& v METRO AREA: 612TOLL FREEISOD252-1156 n2. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELDVERIFYALLEXISTINGUTILRY `� � \..\ -� �� __�� - -, -' UTILITY EASEMENT i. THE PRESENCE OF GROUNDWATER SHOULD BE ANTICIPATED ON THIS PROJECT. CONTRACTOR'S BID •`v LOCATIONS AND INVERTS, SHOWN OR NOT SHOWN. ANY DISCREPANCY BETWEEN PIANS AND FIELD CONDITIONS SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE PROJECT ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY. PHASE 1 \ �.... 3. THECONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OFTHE BUILDING PIPE SYSTEM P LUMBING PERMITS FROM THE CITYBUILDINGDEPARTMENT. —Y EXISTING WATERMAIN I P]OR TO CONSTRUCTION s 4. ALLTORM SEWER AND APPURTEANNANCESMUSTBEFURNISHEDANDINSTAUEDINACCORDANCE LEGEND $ 10. UTILITY TRENCHES SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 0% STANDARD PROCTOR MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY WITH THE CITY OF ST, LOUIS PARK AND MOST RECENT REVISION OFTHE'CITY ENGINEERS WATER MANAGEMENT TO CONTROL MOISTURE OF SOILS. REFER TO MASTER SITE SPECIFICATIONS. 15 ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA"(CEAM) STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FORUNUTYCONSTRUCTON. — — FFE=885.50 I 5. WATERMAIN SHALL BE CLASS 52 DIP CONFORMING TOTHE REQUIREMENTSOFANSVAWWA E CL51/A21.51 AND C10MA21.4. FITTINGS SHALL BE CLASS 2WCCNFORMINGTOTHEREOUIREMENTS DRAINAGE& 11RIO CONTRACTOR S HALL NOTIFY THE CITY A MINIMUM OF a HOURS PR TO WORKING WITHIN THE OF ANSI/AW WA C110/A21.10 OR ANSI/AMA C15NA21.W. HYDRANTS SHALL BE PER CITY OFST LOUIS PARK/ GOLDEN VALLEY REQUIREMENTS. GATE VALVES SHALL BE SINGLE DISC TYPE WTIH RESIUENT PROPOSED STORM SEWER SEAL MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF AMA C508. ALL PLUGS, TEES, BENDS AND OTHER THRUST . 'S RIGHT-0FWAY. ° :• EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER POINTSSHALL BE PROVIDED WITH CONCRETE THRUST BLOCKING. ALLWATERMAINSHAL-BE 4 PROPOSED STORM SEWER MH/CB 12. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL, INSPECT, MAINTAIN AND REMOVETHENECESSARVSIGNAGEFORMN '- - LANE CLOSURES. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES AND SIGNING SHALLCONFORMTO THE MMUTCD, ; I SEM UTILITY EAENT 13 a EXISTING STORM SEWER - SERVICE, THE COMPLETED WATERMAINSHALL BE DISINFECTED AND RUSHED IN ACCORDANCE SWPPP REQUIRED BY STATE/LOCAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SPECIFIC OUTLOT. v 13. REFER TO UTICA AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL DESIGN DETAIL FOR UTILITIES IN m WITHAMAC651AND THEREQUIREM E NTS OF THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENTOFHEALTH, 17 EXISTING STORM SEWER MH B STORMWAMR 8 6. SANITARY SEWER SHALL BE PVC SDR35 UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. SANITARY MANHOLES SHALL UTICA AVENUE. BE 46'DIAMETER PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE IN ACCORDANCEWTTHASTMC47B.CASTING SHALL BE NEENAH R-1642 WITH TYPE "B" COVER. MANHOLES SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM OFTWO AND . PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER � MAXIMUM OF FOUR ADIUSTMENTRINGS. d EXISTING SANITARY SEWER ]. ALL PIPE CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING UTILITY STRUCTURESSHAL-K`KCR-NSEM''CRCITY ` APPROVED EQUAL FOR CONCRETE BLOCK OR BRICK STRUCTURES, CONSTRUCT PN OPENING —io-x—Io-x—Io-w— PROPOSED 10" WATERMAIN TREATMENT I. 4^ C ITY REQUIREMENTS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALLVERIFYTHETYPEOFOONNECTIONWTTHCITV —e-w—e-w— PROPOSED 8" WATERMAIN 8 `a ENGINEERING'OEPARTMENT AND COORDINATE ANY INSPECTIONS NEEDED FORCITVACCEPTANCE. EASEMENT I OUTLOT A - /t I E i - ---- -- I 4T DRAINAGE& OFFICE PHASE 2 PROPOSED UND I Y ❑ 13DETENTION UTILITY EASEMENT FFE=888.50 _ DRAINAGE& UTILITY EASEMENT ..` PROPOSED {� 1 ElUNDERGROUND T L b : ❑ CISTERN IF 7jt M ETFJERT AIN a �, tt LOT 1 - RESIDENTIAL PHASE 1 f _ FFE=882.00 - A o Nx x x CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK17 ry' CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY I ` 1o'oRAINADE& UT1LITv EASEMENT tti� Za O I� EXISTING SANITARY SEWER UFT I W v STATION u EXISTING ACCESS EASEMENT I I In _ 10' DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT LOT 2 - RESIDENTIAL PHASE 2 FFE=882.00 I / b LOT 3 - HOTEL FFE=880.00 / / I nnImo_ - � � . v -10' DRAINAGE 8 LU Q �� UTILITY EASEMENT ®\Ir u Ent ��LL��,=,�,�A�wn,.w�.��No -`o EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION FOR EXISTING UNDERGROUND VTILffV LOCATIONS. ilMN CITIES �� "' lov10'ORAINAGE& v METRO AREA: 612TOLL FREEISOD252-1156 n2. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELDVERIFYALLEXISTINGUTILRY `� � \..\ -� �� __�� - -, -' UTILITY EASEMENT i. THE PRESENCE OF GROUNDWATER SHOULD BE ANTICIPATED ON THIS PROJECT. CONTRACTOR'S BID •`v LOCATIONS AND INVERTS, SHOWN OR NOT SHOWN. ANY DISCREPANCY BETWEEN PIANS AND FIELD CONDITIONS SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE PROJECT ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY. \ �.... 3. THECONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OFTHE BUILDING PIPE SYSTEM P LUMBING PERMITS FROM THE CITYBUILDINGDEPARTMENT. —Y EXISTING WATERMAIN P]OR TO CONSTRUCTION s 4. ALLTORM SEWER AND APPURTEANNANCESMUSTBEFURNISHEDANDINSTAUEDINACCORDANCE LEGEND $ 10. UTILITY TRENCHES SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 0% STANDARD PROCTOR MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY WITH THE CITY OF ST, LOUIS PARK AND MOST RECENT REVISION OFTHE'CITY ENGINEERS WATER MANAGEMENT TO CONTROL MOISTURE OF SOILS. REFER TO MASTER SITE SPECIFICATIONS. 15 ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA"(CEAM) STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FORUNUTYCONSTRUCTON. — — PROPERTY LINE I ROW ALLCONTRACTORS MUST CONTACT 5. WATERMAIN SHALL BE CLASS 52 DIP CONFORMING TOTHE REQUIREMENTSOFANSVAWWA E CL51/A21.51 AND C10MA21.4. FITTINGS SHALL BE CLASS 2WCCNFORMINGTOTHEREOUIREMENTS CITY LIMIT UNE 11RIO CONTRACTOR S HALL NOTIFY THE CITY A MINIMUM OF a HOURS PR TO WORKING WITHIN THE OF ANSI/AW WA C110/A21.10 OR ANSI/AMA C15NA21.W. HYDRANTS SHALL BE PER CITY OFST LOUIS PARK/ GOLDEN VALLEY REQUIREMENTS. GATE VALVES SHALL BE SINGLE DISC TYPE WTIH RESIUENT PROPOSED STORM SEWER SEAL MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF AMA C508. ALL PLUGS, TEES, BENDS AND OTHER THRUST . 'S RIGHT-0FWAY. ° :• EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER POINTSSHALL BE PROVIDED WITH CONCRETE THRUST BLOCKING. ALLWATERMAINSHAL-BE 4 PROPOSED STORM SEWER MH/CB 12. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL, INSPECT, MAINTAIN AND REMOVETHENECESSARVSIGNAGEFORMN '- - LANE CLOSURES. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES AND SIGNING SHALLCONFORMTO THE MMUTCD, c INSTALLED WITH A MINIMUM OF TV CO VERANDINACCORDANCEWTTHAWWAC AND BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS CONDUCTIVITY PROVISIONS CONFORMING TO ANSUAWWAC111/A21.11. BEFORE BEING PLACED IN >>— EXISTING STORM SEWER - SERVICE, THE COMPLETED WATERMAINSHALL BE DISINFECTED AND RUSHED IN ACCORDANCE SWPPP REQUIRED BY STATE/LOCAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SPECIFIC OUTLOT. v 13. REFER TO UTICA AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL DESIGN DETAIL FOR UTILITIES IN m WITHAMAC651AND THEREQUIREM E NTS OF THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENTOFHEALTH, 17 EXISTING STORM SEWER MH B 8 6. SANITARY SEWER SHALL BE PVC SDR35 UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. SANITARY MANHOLES SHALL UTICA AVENUE. BE 46'DIAMETER PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE IN ACCORDANCEWTTHASTMC47B.CASTING SHALL BE NEENAH R-1642 WITH TYPE "B" COVER. MANHOLES SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM OFTWO AND . PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER MAXIMUM OF FOUR ADIUSTMENTRINGS. d EXISTING SANITARY SEWER ]. ALL PIPE CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING UTILITY STRUCTURESSHAL-K`KCR-NSEM''CRCITY ` APPROVED EQUAL FOR CONCRETE BLOCK OR BRICK STRUCTURES, CONSTRUCT PN OPENING —io-x—Io-x—Io-w— PROPOSED 10" WATERMAIN o EQUALTO THE PIPE SIZE, GROUTAROUND PIPE TO CLOSE OPENING, AND REPAIR STRUCTURE TO C ITY REQUIREMENTS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALLVERIFYTHETYPEOFOONNECTIONWTTHCITV —e-w—e-w— PROPOSED 8" WATERMAIN `a ENGINEERING'OEPARTMENT AND COORDINATE ANY INSPECTIONS NEEDED FORCITVACCEPTANCE. i • 8. UPON ANY GRAD INO, SURFACING, OR OTHER WORK, ALL UPUTYCASTINGS (INCLUOINGVALVES, MANHOCES,'AND DRAINAGE CASTINGS) MUST BE RAISED TO AT -GRADE OR ABOVEGRAOE (AS —mow—rn— PROPOSED3"WATERMAIN ALERT TO CONTRACTOR: APPROPRIATE) WITHIN 48 HOURS OF BEING COVERED. THIS INCLUOESALLCASTINGS, OLDOR NEW. —z-w—z-n— PROPOSED 2"WATERMAIN i. THE PRESENCE OF GROUNDWATER SHOULD BE ANTICIPATED ON THIS PROJECT. CONTRACTOR'S BID S.CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING THEAPPROPRIATESEWER, WATER, AND SHALL INCLUDE CONSIDERATION FOR THIS ISSUE. WHEN PERFORMING GRADING OF RATIONS P LUMBING PERMITS FROM THE CITYBUILDINGDEPARTMENT. —Y EXISTING WATERMAIN DURING PERIODS OF WET WEATHER, PROVIDE ADEQUATE DEWATERING, DRAINAGE AND GROUND $ 10. UTILITY TRENCHES SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 0% STANDARD PROCTOR MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY WATER MANAGEMENT TO CONTROL MOISTURE OF SOILS. REFER TO MASTER SITE SPECIFICATIONS. - (ASTM D898.78 OR AASHTO T-89) FROM THE PIPE ZONE TO WITHIN 3 FEETOFTHE GROUND SURFACE AND 1 W%STANDARD PROCTOR IN THE UPPER THREE FEET. —sws—cee— EXISTING GAS MAN ALLCONTRACTORS MUST CONTACT 11RIO CONTRACTOR S HALL NOTIFY THE CITY A MINIMUM OF a HOURS PR TO WORKING WITHIN THE GOPHER STATE CALL ONE 2. ALL GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED (EARTHWORK, FINAL UTILITIES, AND FINAL . 'S RIGHT-0FWAY. ° :• EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER TOLL FREE 1-800-252-1166 GRADING) BV THE MILESTONE DATE IN PROJECT DOCUMENTS. OMOT AREATO BE KEPT FREE OF JOB TRAILERS AND STORAGE AFTER THE CONTRACT MILESTONE DATE FOR THE OUTLOT. GENERAL 12. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL, INSPECT, MAINTAIN AND REMOVETHENECESSARVSIGNAGEFORMN '- - LANE CLOSURES. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES AND SIGNING SHALLCONFORMTO THE MMUTCD, - - 7-?'-?'• EXISTING BUILDING BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE CLEAR ACCESS FOR OUTLOT CONTRACTORTOTHE SPECIFIC PARCELAT ALL TIMES AFTER MILESTONE DATE. PURCHASER OF OUTLOTTO PROVIDE PERMITDOCUMENTS AND INCLUDING FIELD MANUAL FOR TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROLZONE LAYOUTS, DECEMBER 2(01. ONE ELEVEN FOOT MINIMUM WITH LANE IN EACH DIRECTIONSHALLSEPROVIDEDAT ALLTIMES. ® FUTURE UNDERGROUND STORAGE AREA TWIN CITY AREA 651-454-0002 SWPPP REQUIRED BY STATE/LOCAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SPECIFIC OUTLOT. v 13. REFER TO UTICA AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL DESIGN DETAIL FOR UTILITIES IN UTICA AVENUE. E 14. CONTRACTOR IS TO LOCATE ALL MANHOLES OUTSIDE OF DRIVING LANES. 2 O S GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 0 25 50 100 ►I J JJ Lu > J O cZ G Lu -i J Q Lu i J Z Q y W 'z Q �LlJ a o0 o J (n Za J LU u) 0 U 5 O J U) DATE 02/02/2015 PROJECT NO. 160755001 ■1.1 11 UTILITY NOTES LEGEND SANITARY N 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT LEAST48 HOURS PRIOR TO o THE MMUTCO, INCLUDING FIELD MANUAL FOR TEMPORARYTRAFFICCONTROLZONE UYOUTS, DECEMBER ZXH. ONE ELEVEN FOOT MINIMUM WITH LANE IN EACH DIRECTION 869.60 i c EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION FOR EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATIONS. TWIN - PROPERTY LINE/ ROW -------- J CIT I ES METRO AREA: 612-454-00020R TOLL FREE: 1�252-11W- M N TOLL FREE 1-B00-252-1166 OUT '0 13. REFER TO UTICA AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PUNS FOR ADDRIONALDESIGN DETAILFOR 3 2. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS AND INVERTS, SHOWN OR NOT BROWN. ANY DISCREPANCY BETWEEN PLANS CITY LIMTTUNE BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS N 865.84 m AND FIELD CONDITIONS SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE PROJECT ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY. PROPOS E D STORM SEWER. o TWIN CITY AREA 651-454-0002 a 3. TH E CONTRACTOR S HALL VE RIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF THE BUILDING PIPE SYS TEM PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION SERVICE CONNECTIONS. t i PROPOS E D STORM SEWER MHICB .fi 1 Ii ° 4. ALLSTORM SEWER AND APPURTENANCES MUST BEFURNISHEDANDINSTALLEDIN UTILITY LEGEND BOTTOM: 874.55 ACLORDANCEWITH THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK AND MOST RECENT REVISION OFTHE EXISTING STORM SEWER 10'SPRINKLER ENTRY. DOUBLE DETECTOR BACKFLOW PREVENTER LOCATED INSIDE THE BUIDLING. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REQUIREDTO INSTALLANY E ARCH. PLANS. ..Cl ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA- CEAM)STANDAADSPECIFICATONS FOR APPURTENANCES ON THE SPRINKLER LINE SUCH AS, BUT NOT UMITEDTO, INSTALLINGGATE GAS ENTRY WITH GAS METER, CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR INSTALLING Q UTILITY CONSTRUCTION. Ql a EXISTING STORM SEWER MH/CB MH VALVES, ETC, MEETING LOCAL WATER DEPARTMENT SPECIFICATIONS. REF. E 5, WATERMAIN SHALL BE CUSS 52 DIP CONFORMING TOTHE REQUIREMENTS OFANSI/AWWA 874.62 ARCH PUNS FOR EXACT LOCATION FO SPRINIpER ENTRY AND BACNFLO✓J K BOTTOM: BE CLP5525000NFORMING TO THE �� PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER QCONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATONWITHGAS COMPANY REGARDING THE SIZE AND INSTALLATION OFGAS SERVICE UNE.THEGAS O REQUIREMENTS OF ANSI/ANNYA L110/A21.100R ANSI/AMA C153'A21.53. HYDRANTS SHALL RE UIREMENND OF AN21.4. AClI A21.10 _ COMPANY IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE INSTALLATION OFTHEGAS SERVICE '�-_---- -- _ _ BEPER CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK/ GOLDEN VALLEY REQUIREMENTS. GATE VALVES SHALL D EXISTING SANITARY SEWER fyf Y K O - BE SINGLE DISC TYPE WITH RESILIENT SEAL MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OFANNJA CSW. ALL PLUGS, TEES, BENDS AND OTHER THRUST POINTS SHALLBE PROVIDED WfTH -Io-w-to-w-Io-w- PROPOSED 10WATERMAIN O °R --- `- - CON CRETE THRUST BLOCKING. ALL WATERMAIN SHALLBE INSTALLEDWIRH A MINIMUM OF 1TWATERMAINVALVE. O PROPOSED LOCATION OF TRANSFORMER PAD. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY O u _ 7.5' COVER AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH AMA C60DANDCONDUCTNRYPROVISIONS CONFORMING TO ANSI/ANWVA C11lIA21.11. BEFORE BEING PLACED IN SERVICE, THE -o-w sw- PROPOSED S"WATERMAIN i PAD. CONDUIT FROM PAD TO BUILDING, AND PIPE BOMARDSAS REQUIRED BY n COMPLETED WATERMAIN SHALL BE DISINFECTED AND FLUSHED IN ACCORDANCE WITH -yx max- PROPOSED 3"WATERMAIN OP 10'x3"WATERMAIN TEE. -AMAC851ANDTHEREQUIREMENTSOF THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH. ¢ 6. SANITARY SEWER SHALL BE PVC SDR35 UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. SANITARY MANHOLES -xw-i-w- PROPOSED 2"WATERMAIN 10'PUBLIC WATERMAIN. SOLURD CANNOT CONFLICT WITH SHALL BE 48" DIAMETER PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE INAOCARDANCEWRHASTM TREATMENT ,$ - = C478. CASTING SHALL BE NEENAH R-1642 WITH TYPE "&'COVER. MANHOLESSHALLHAVEA -- w -1 EXISTING WATERMAIN EASEMENT w MINIMUMOF TWO AND MAXIMUM OF FOUR ADJUSTMENT RINGS. O � OCONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATEWTTHTHETELEPHONE 0 7. ALL PIPE CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING UTILITY STRUCTURES SHALLBE'XCR-NSEAU'OR -A-- EXISTING G49 MAIN a -„ O CITY APPROVED EQUAL. FOR CONCRETE BLOCK OR BRICKSTRUCTURES, CONSTRUCTAN m OPENING EQUAL TO THE PIPE SIZE, GROUT AROUND PIPE TO CLOSE OPENING, AND REPAIR EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER PROPOSED t a° STRUCTURE TO CITY REQUIREMENTS THE CONTRACTOR SHALLVERIFY THE TYPE OF ---E UNDERGROUND 10"X8" WATERMAIN TEE o CONNECTION WITH CITY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTAND COORDINATE ANYINSPECTIONS 7r-- , EXISTING BUILDING STORMTECH NEED ED FOR CITYPLCEPTANCE. e B UPON ANYGRADING SURFACING OR OTHER WORK AIL UTILITY CASTINGS(INCLUDING PPOSED UNDERGROUND STORAGE RO SYSTEM 4 VALVES, MANHOLES, AND DRAINAGE CASTINGS) MUSTBERAISEDTOATGRADEOR ABOVE -GRADE (AS APPROPRIATE) WITHIN d8 HOURS OF BEING COVERED. THIS INCLUDES AREA ,n `d E ALL CASTINGS, OLD OR NEW. REQUIRED. „ 9. CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING THE APPROPRIATE SEWER, WATER, ® SANITARY SEWER STRUCTURE LABEL AND PLUMBING PERMITS FROM THE CITY BUILDING DEPARTMENT. =a OTDOMESTIC BACKFLOW PREVENTER LOCATED INSIDE THE BUILDING. OONTRACTORSHPII : 10 UTILITY TRENCHES SHALL BE COMPACTED T095% STANDARD PROCTOR MAXIMUM DRY PEETOFTHE BE RESPONSIBLE FOR INSTALLING ANY APPURTENANCESON THE DOMESTIC DENSITY(ASTM D898.78OR AASHTOT-99) FROM THE PIPEZONETOWI 1143 LINE SUCH AS BACKFLOW PREVENTOR, GATE VALVES, ETC. WHICH MAYBE $GROUND SURFACE AND 100% STANDARD PROCTOR IN THE UPPER THREE FEET. 'a 11 CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE LIN A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS PRIOR TO WORKING REQUIRED. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WTTHCrTY. CONTRACTORSHALL PROPOSED ---�-"• WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. REF. ARCH PUNS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS OFDOMESTIC WATER ENTRY, UNDERGROUJD 4 #" 12. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL,INSPECT, MAINTAIN AND REMOVE THE NECESSARYSIGNAGE ALL CONTRACTORS MUST CONTACT CISTERN - `o FOR UNE CLOSURES. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES AND SIGNING SHALL CONFORM TO ��--�-' SS -2 SANITARY N 5 8 o THE MMUTCO, INCLUDING FIELD MANUAL FOR TEMPORARYTRAFFICCONTROLZONE UYOUTS, DECEMBER ZXH. ONE ELEVEN FOOT MINIMUM WITH LANE IN EACH DIRECTION 869.60 SANITARY GOPHER STATE CALL ONE ' $ SHALL BE PROVIDED ATALLTMES. J SERVICE M N TOLL FREE 1-B00-252-1166 OUT '0 13. REFER TO UTICA AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PUNS FOR ADDRIONALDESIGN DETAILFOR INV:8W.0866.00 873.80 BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS N 865.84 UTILITIES IN UTICAAVENUE. TOP: o TWIN CITY AREA 651-454-0002 ❑ 14, CONTRACTOR IS TO LOCATE ALL MANHOLES OUTSIDE OF DRIVING UNE&. SS -2 MH TOP: UTILITY LEGEND BOTTOM: 874.55 6' SANITARY SEWER LATERAL AT MINIMUM I.D.% SLOPE, COORDINATE WITH O 10'SPRINKLER ENTRY. DOUBLE DETECTOR BACKFLOW PREVENTER LOCATED INSIDE THE BUIDLING. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REQUIREDTO INSTALLANY E ARCH. PLANS. 861.51 APPURTENANCES ON THE SPRINKLER LINE SUCH AS, BUT NOT UMITEDTO, INSTALLINGGATE GAS ENTRY WITH GAS METER, CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR INSTALLING Q WITH ACHECK VALVE, POST INDICATOR VALVE, TAMPER SWITCH, - Q PIPE BOLLARD PROTECTION AT METER, CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE MH VALVES, ETC, MEETING LOCAL WATER DEPARTMENT SPECIFICATIONS. REF. WITH GAS COMPANY FOR TYING OF INDIVIDUAL METER. 874.62 ARCH PUNS FOR EXACT LOCATION FO SPRINIpER ENTRY AND BACNFLO✓J K BOTTOM: 868.52 PREVENTER. E QCONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATONWITHGAS COMPANY REGARDING THE SIZE AND INSTALLATION OFGAS SERVICE UNE.THEGAS O PROPOSED HYDRANT AND ASSEMBLY, TYPICAL PS INDICATED. SEE _ COMPANY IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE INSTALLATION OFTHEGAS SERVICE TOP: : FROM THE DISTRIBUTION MAIN, UP TO AND INCWUNG THE GAS METER. THE fyf ° CONTRACTOR 15 RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL GAS SERVICE INSTALUTIONAFMIR K O EXISTINGFIREHYDRANT.€ I THE METER. E O C I REMOVE EXISTING STUB, CONNECT TO EXISTING WATERMAIN.INSTAL POST OD TAMPER SWITCH PIERTOL�A`L 1"PVC CONDUIT FOR TAMPER SNITCH AND O 1TWATERMAINVALVE. O PROPOSED LOCATION OF TRANSFORMER PAD. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY O TVALVE. rc EXACT LOCATION AND SIZE WITH POWER COMPANY PRIOR TO INSTALLATION CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR INSTALUTIONOFOONCRETE O 10"WATERMAIN BEND. PAD. CONDUIT FROM PAD TO BUILDING, AND PIPE BOMARDSAS REQUIRED BY a THE ELECTRIC COMPANY, CONTRACTOR SHALLCCORDINATESAOWMRK OP 10'x3"WATERMAIN TEE. 3 WITH THE ELECTRIC COMPANY. FINAL LOCATIONOFTRANSFORMER AND TRUCKAOCESS TO DOCK DOOR. O 10'PUBLIC WATERMAIN. SOLURD CANNOT CONFLICT WITH FROM POLE TO BUILDINGTOBEEXTENDEDBY O V PUBLIC SANITARYSEWER. QUNERGROUNPHONE DTEHONE TEL- O PRIVATE WATERMAIN. OCONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATEWTTHTHETELEPHONE E COMPANY FOR THE INSTALLATION OFTELEPHONESERVICE.THE O PRIVATE SANITARYSEWER TRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR INSTALLING ACONDUIT, PULLWIRES, CONLL AND PULL BOXES FROM THE PROPERTY LINE TOTHE BUILDING ENTRANCE. O 10"X8" WATERMAIN TEE �L p �L /� p ATO CONTRACTOR: TELEPHONE COMPANY WILL PULL WIRES FOR TELEPHONESERVICE. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE THE TYING OF PROPOSEDTELEPHONE IO 1, THE PRESENCE OF GROUNDWATER SHOULD BE ANTICIPATEp ON THIS PROJECT CONTRACTOR'S BID AREAS SHALL BE H-20 HEAVY DUTY BOXES. CONTRACTOR SHALLBE SHALL INCLUDE CONSIDERATION FOR THIS ISSUE. WHEN PERFORMING GRADINGOPERAT10M p RES PONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING THE SIZE AND NUMBER OF CONDUITS DURING PERIODS OF WET WEATHER, PROVIDE ADEQUATE DEWATERING, DRAINAGE AND GROUND REQUIRED. WATER MANAGEMENT TO CONTROL MOISTURE OF SOILS. REFERTOMASTERSRESPECIRCATIONS. WATERLINE ENTRY. METER AND REDUCED PRESSURE 2_ ALL GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED (EARTHWORK. RNAL UTILITIES. AND FINAL OTDOMESTIC BACKFLOW PREVENTER LOCATED INSIDE THE BUILDING. OONTRACTORSHPII GRADING) BY THE MILESTONE DATE IN PROJECT DOCUMENTS .OUTLOT AREATO BE KEPT FREE OF BE RESPONSIBLE FOR INSTALLING ANY APPURTENANCESON THE DOMESTIC JOB TRAILERS AND STORAGE AFTER THE CONTRACT MILESTONE DATE FORTHE OUTLOT GENERAL LINE SUCH AS BACKFLOW PREVENTOR, GATE VALVES, ETC. WHICH MAYBE CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE CLEAR ACCESS FOR OUTLOT CONTRACTOR TOTHE SPECIM PARCELAT REQUIRED. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WTTHCrTY. CONTRACTORSHALL ALLTIMES AFTERMILESTONE DATE. PURCHASER OF OUTLOTTOPROVIDE PERMRDOCUMENTS AND REF. ARCH PUNS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS OFDOMESTIC WATER ENTRY, SWPPP RE.U1RED BY STATE/LOCAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SPECIRCOU .. _ 0 BLACKFLOW PREVENTER AND METER. ° I CON Y TO EXISTING S' BAISTARY SEWER NV=BSS.BS I SEWER I 8 j CONNECTTOEXISTINGIO WATERMAIN R 5 L I w 3 u--.'.. _/"erg s.. .. ..�;°`v '',. SS -1 T 110 LF OF B'PVC 00.40% L S 7` f SS -2 N i 7 Smumm won=I'V41 It -1 :: MLLG01W Z ntE - Y-------- - -- 3 A 15 LF Ir PVC o BAD% �1 SANITARY o I M N SERVICE ENlWXE I 5 N 7 INVAN.00 D H Ai4y I H S ICE ° I INV 00 s I J I I UTILITY ENTRY DETAIL T' = 20' ` __. CONNECTTC (._:: ____ ____ ___-___- SANITARYSEWER LOIXtNN� INV Bp6B6 LIT DRAILnY EASFIB4T N TO E708TINO10' .. WATERMAN DRANAOEI UTILITY EASEMENT III J I i�x, DRAINAGES UTILITY EASEMENT 133 LF OF S' PVC 0 0.40% ��--�-' SS -2 SANITARY N LF OF ISP PVC 00.00%- 4 869.60 SANITARY ELEVATION - SANITARY SERVICE J SERVICE ENTRANCE OUT - INV:8W.0866.00 873.80 NV',ENTRANCE N 865.84 PRIVATE PVC TOP: o BOTTOM: ❑ wO SS -2 ❑ ❑ I ---- SEE UTICA PUNS ' FOR 11 RELOCANfERCEPfOR R. - 29 LF OF W PVC 0 UK L - 55-3 M TK DRAINAGE Mn U L B UTILITY EASEMENT I IA SEE UTILITY ENTRY DETAIL 5 1 L N THIS SHEET I I I Q O IO U 2 � E c ao as A&,00 - $ �p 'J WATER- SANITARY N +O DRAINAGES UTILITY EASEMENT 869.60 •� Y ELEVATION I♦ 873.78 J TOP: 869.90 OUT - BOTTOM: 873.80 O N 865.84 PRIVATE PVC TOP: 00cl CROSSING WATER- SANITARY STORM +O TOP: 869.60 R u ELEVATION BOTTOM: 873.78 J TOP: 869.90 OUT - BOTTOM: 873.80 O N 865.84 PRIVATE PVC TOP: 866.65 BOTTOM: 873.85 wO SS -2 MH TOP: 866.42 BOTTOM: 874.55 Q BOTTOM: 868.89 TOP: 861.51 - 878.32 HE 863.88 Q TOP: 869.25 MH 878.97 E 864.23 BOTTOM: 874.62 Qi BOTTOM: 868.52 TOP: 861.55 TOP: 868.89 BOTTOM: 874.65 •ASSUMED 7.5 FOOT OEPTI OF INSTALLATION FOP WATER SERVICE. Z O A GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 0 20 40 8C 0� Z } Lu J J Q LU > W Z Q Y 0� Q -j0 LU 0- U(5 0 Q_ �' W Cf 0-' 10� ~ d U Z � LU u p U � O U) 02/02/2015 PROJECT NO. 160755001 SHEET NUMBER 6061 - V SANITARY SEWER STRUCTURE SCHEDULE N CD w INVERT ELEVATION - � R u ELEVATION 3 J IN OUT D7 SS -1 p 881.72 E 865.94 N 865.84 PRIVATE PVC 0� Z } Lu J J Q LU > W Z Q Y 0� Q -j0 LU 0- U(5 0 Q_ �' W Cf 0-' 10� ~ d U Z � LU u p U � O U) 02/02/2015 PROJECT NO. 160755001 SHEET NUMBER 6061 SANITARY SEWER STRUCTURE SCHEDULE STRUCTURE STRUCTURE RIM/GRATE INVERT ELEVATION INVERT ELEVATION PIPE OUT PIPE MATERIAL NO. TYPE ELEVATION (PUBLIC/PRIVATE) IN OUT SS -1 MH 881.72 E 865.94 N 865.84 PRIVATE PVC N 860.84 SS -2 MH 880.96 S 665.28 PRIVATE PSC E 865.85 SS -3 MH 878.32 HE 863.88 S 863.77 PRIVATE Pec SS -4 MH 878.97 E 864.23 SW 864.13 PRIVATE Pec 0� Z } Lu J J Q LU > W Z Q Y 0� Q -j0 LU 0- U(5 0 Q_ �' W Cf 0-' 10� ~ d U Z � LU u p U � O U) 02/02/2015 PROJECT NO. 160755001 SHEET NUMBER 6061 z aww �o 3 ayw o N n i:3a4g N N � z z J�4 N �'n �7 z iv a z Pa 9w 'NaOH-A3lWIN'MMM O a Z 0O U W "^ 0zN¢; NOD L61* -949-199 3NOHd 41199 NW 'lnVd '15 N8£Z 3LINS '1S3M 3AY AlISd3AIN0 o99ZIn s 10z/Z0/z0:31V(I sa[9b WaM AB 03NO3H0 -IN �, I �t/I1N341S32j 0�4 'n O N Z 0 0 w m HLL �- � < w= $ z yz 3 N3BWNN 35N30N NW S Ae NMYaa NW 'A311VA N3a10`J/>J2JVd SIf10� 'iS oo w K c) o �`�`'•' NV Qz� UJOH �<</CMWI art d '� sv�m MWBAB mN0153a N`d-Id Alli an 1S3M AHVd IVf J1N30 N O a N -'z-- Z W' '0 W Ia33NI0 N3 N01530 33tl0s GO U i FEUF- {"�� ttaal ?lnsJirz YS� $a �zr WWZ z aww �o 3 ayw o N n i:3a4g N N � z z J�4 N �'n �7 z iv a z Pa 9w K m J J O a Z 0O U W "^ 0zN¢; m w J zj= j 5 rozp IM V) Is "s <i 3 �< Waw=Li o I HLL �- � < w= $ z yz 3 ma r < 2WU mN �$ 2 K aio �`�`'•' NV Qz� ooa osis �f 4g W OS Uliii�zOiim> � ��Zyyi �tJ`dpf<<h<'-pA 1H6 is o< w aw OZ OW -'z-- Z W' '0 W Vwxi jWU0 GO U i FEUF- {"�� ttaal ?lnsJirz YS� $a �zr WWZ Ina4m owxq e o < m ti c w af Z gmS pOWv O O � � z0 w��W N <waN K o<pin 4i Z Y K z W w rowW z z < W m W Z CL K mN xa' J WX (7 pVON <n.�V O �d V U N 21 �x Kmo o m? Wzw o�a4 � r U z U W iE Z Z 'w�Z ~ Z D W$ O ��� r FOrip48 p1y Z < O wJ pp }•ipnZ EE4 =V<x)Z< UO U X N ¢O rL W 5 Z s •+z w m W �Z �24 m s iz Q z m A2ift8 ,9,L X0��,,11 rn Iz7 z M. 00 W Z Q N 3 g�� o2 - V _ - - MoL Z W 3a O\ XU YS a a m o Jao N CIL 0 <' 0, J a a oN J a' V1 c' a 2Fa U w w z a' z 0(A U o < O xvo a �LLIU w J V U O Q --m IF z�m a LL W N m L Ojz M — <a W I..L < I_ Oz< yW j Z< J i Fp K=O j o ate a Nw Ow ao<w i m a a o , U 1�'. ' O i 3 o% ° c5 a o z O W ®W z aww �o 3 ayw o N n i:3a4g N N � z z J�4 N �'n �7 z iv a z Pa 9w 3iwb zo n U Y W Z Z O 4 U Y 8 S W won w ci ssn Ilo . to ftftft K Uj W N �dtf qq S� A F 8 yYkd N Iw!N of V1111Vo11 inoVll^ a9 tl Cuo w a K m J J O a Z 0O U W "^ O 0 m w J zj= j 5 rozp IM V) Is "s <i 3 �< Waw=Li o I HLL �- � < w= $ z z ma r w 2WU mN �$ 2 K U l.- wWwJZUw O osis �f 4g W OS Uliii�zOiim> � ��Zyyi �tJ`dpf<<h<'-pA 1H6 JZ~m <W o< w aw OZ OW -'z-- Z W' '0 W m c0 GO U i FEUF- {"�� ttaal ?lnsJirz YS� W o� ul z $p o < m ti c w af Z W O < U ca. U O Z z to W a' Z W W m \� Z O LLI J K mN V IM !n < U 21 aw �� Z < 7 z a o z J W Z Z ~ Z D W$ O Jaz ax;o < < nj y S w U NH m Cll 1 rL W 5 Z s •+z w %Z s= a Z U V CA N �24 m s w o 0 3iwb zo n U Y W Z Z O 4 U Y 8 S W won w ci ssn Ilo . to ftftft K Uj W N �dtf qq S� A F 8 yYkd N Iw!N of V1111Vo11 inoVll^ a9 tl Cuo w a J W < W LJ W ula�a + z o Q J Z N O 3 W < Z W ?i J a (n N O z 0 O < Z ww ILU cr < W JW of W H Z V) < U W 7 Z 00 < J J Wa m Z W < U K Z U a U < J ui U V) Z D Z_ Z Z H � Z Z N K m J J O a Z 0O U W D :3m ZZ O 0 m w J IM V) Is <i 3 �< Waw=Li �_� ow oO z m w 2WU mN �$ 2 K U l.- wWwJZUw O aQ la- Fn w am JZ~m <W o< w aw OZ OW Z W' '0 W m i a < I.- FEUF- QVJ 3 05 ul z < o af Q N < W O < U zZzo U O Z z to W a' Z W W m \� Z O LLI J K mN V IM !n < U 21 aw �� Z < 7 z a o Ax J W Z Z ~ Z D O Jaz ax;o < < nj y S w U U m U Sg Z < U O a Z U V CA Q < m w o 11%r X0��,,11 rn Iz7 O O[5w Z 00 W Z Q N 3 g�� F V Z U W X Q Z • MoL W i O\ XU YS a a m o Jao N 0 J a a J a' V1 c' W Q w w z a' z 0(A o o xvo a �LLIU J W < W LJ W ula�a + z o Q J Z N O 3 W < Z W ?i J a (n N O z 0 O < Z ww ILU cr < W JW of W H Z V) < U W 7 Z 00 < J J Wa m Z W < U K Z U a U < J ui U V) Z D Z_ Z Z H � Z Z N K m J J O a Z 0O U W D :3m ZZ O 0 m w J IM V) Is Z W O a �< Waw=Li �_� ow oO z m w 2WU mN a 2 K U l.- wWwJZUw O aQ la- Fn w N JZ~m <W o< w aw OZ OW Z W' '0 W m z z < I.- FEUF- QVJ 3 < o af Q N < W < U zZzo U O Z W a' Z W W m \� W J ~ < O LLI J ~ cr V IM !n w J i J < O ui Z �� Z < 7 z a o Z J d a Z Z ~ Z D O J �j FO AZO J zJ VO QO �J oma NORTH N� �Q Nzc nO I p I v WAYZATA BOULEVARD w a _ 01.- w� ol a t \ ZO=QOV V w Z Q J a Z wm_� Q r m 00 L_ aoeay puo wo Q V 0o go �1 F*� G��W U ¢� H.- v �3go 0 0 so 0 O O wU O ,� o wpa00 ww fwiOy� oNj� Oop WNue =F6 O N fo V �ozp yw awa 4 oai 3�awo� LLCL Ouiw zero ODao OF¢ Z 2M, awo>- a O .pow rEopJm use U oow2. oQOwrc Oo;o< U �mw°„ J� '03 ac�pOay Q.. NOTNa0H-A31NIN"MMM S t0Z/ZQ/Z�'31vo L6 Lf-949-LS9 :3NOHd WaM of VLL99 NN 'lnvd is N9Cz 311ns '1s3M 3 v A11Sa3AINn oSSZ uaoH <<<�Ca�u�i}� 5g/9� a3a47nN 3SN3on NN A9 03NO3H0 Nb'� d `^' r`�1 ON IlH V 11 IIV� �I \O lb'I1N301S32i ��a NW `J�3llb/� N3Q�0`J/>I2�bd Slf101 1S 1S3M) 2lVd IV' :UN30 �� oN � o O O z o 0 0 0 � X00 I , 0 , 00 w \LJ _ SSW Ae NMvaa 3NWd sv�m :833NION3 NOIS30 MW% 03N`DIS3o 3�tlD$ O O 01 W W W LL QZ ONS Z FO AZO J zJ VO QO �J oma NORTH N� �Q Nzc nO I p I v WAYZATA BOULEVARD w a _ 01.- w� ol a t \ ZO=QOV V w Z Q J a Z wm_� Q r m 00 L_ aoeay puo wo Q V 0o go �1 F*� G��W U ¢� H.- v �3go 0 0 so 0 O O wU O ,� o wpa00 ww fwiOy� oNj� Oop WNue =F6 O N fo V �ozp yw awa 4 oai 3�awo� LLCL Ouiw zero ODao OF¢ Z 2M, awo>- a O .pow rEopJm use U oow2. oQOwrc Oo;o< U �mw°„ J� '03 ac�pOay Q.. No WOD'NHOH—A31NINM.WN S LOZ�ZO�ZO �1 V V L617-949-199 :3NOHd WQM Ln _ tt 41199 NW 'lnVd '1S SRL9b AG 03NO3HO O O m N2CZ mins '1s3M 3AV ADS83AINn oSSZ WUN30IS3b 010 z o dMrm 3SN3on NW S,W In j 00 Ke WVHO �ISVHd NW 'A3-1-lVA N3MOO/Ai Wd sino- v1S N w Ln z p UaUH{<Aa��'V 3N�vd svon, MWeAe n3NDI530 Nb'�d 9NIlH9II w co Il 11 1S3M 7lbtfd �tfb1N3O o a N ■ :a33NI0N3 N91S30 3ltlOS OUVA3inoa ` ivzAv/" LL�l ... Q o I„ � ........... v I. M �1N I ; I ' N ►M �t �eImillf lI ��11 .SSY3Y Y Y Y - I a I AFI= co wJ= _p Z. GOH HU =68eo € R 5 M 6off N aiQJ w� M FFWs wHg8O awao �jmo; o-•oLL�z wawmp- p °rho m w Hu, s oz�Qa� U �LLx° Y`<wo8 aoai °w p�3o � �uiw •o Z '003 �JNow„ 0 °°w Z., U o2. 0Faow� p Wooer �mwQt- z ao Awa yam aE iia Jiwo'3 au�coiay Q z W FOZ wr= > vZ� a aQ�oZo J Z J I s d a 6 uo ILL SJ�m< LL 0� N h O OQH �U of vl m z z CS NLu.0j It O m 00 r m £r] v Cl) N 1403 NdO-A31MINMMM S IOZ�ZO�Z0 31v0 L6Lf-9b9-IS9 :3NOHd PUM Ln K bILSS NN 'INVd '1S A8 03NO3H0 0 p W NWZ ams '1S3M 3AV AlISN3AIN0 OSSZ 229qnN SN33N NYI SIN �tfIlN341S3b ��Q w\ O /� L^� r 3NAdd � sV�m MWeAe a3 ls3a 0 Co S1Ib'l�4 JNIIHJIj NW ` 1311d/� N3a1O0/�i2Jdd Slf101 1S Ln - lo CD U1�VH(((/�aIwN)i 1S3AAAHVdIV�:LLN30 o a� :633NION3 NOIS30 31tl05 N N O d C 3 U m 3 o �I�aa Y i? a U O o C Q W F< .. w W= > a N U salol l-ep��D tl31N30 S110NIM! J OO Ib a D W }_ LL z .Wl of- A.91 FO I � U to z s Z rn _ z= a 7 _z 7 J -zE3-11 3 W z z E mai c o E z z z 2 mom€ E 3 tttoSSSS �} pg�$ h 40p 000 W N A PON 1 b: x' .E x �E Eu G g O O N C Q7, N N O d C 3 U m 3 o �I�aa Y i? a U O o C Q W F< .. w W= > a N U salol l-ep��D tl31N30 S110NIM! J OO Ib a D W }_ LL z .Wl of- A.91 I � U to V7 7 _z 7 J i z Q W z z N N O d C 3 U m 3 o �I�aa Y i? a U O o C Q W F< .. w W= > a N U salol %w v s�a.o Ib U D W LL SODDED. SOD IS TO BE PRIMARILY KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS, FREE OF LAWN GRASS AND WEEDS. REPLACE DAMAGED LAWN GRASS WITH SOD AS DIRECTED BY ONSITE REPRESENTATIVE. MATCH ALL PROPOSED LANDSCAPED AREAS INTO EXISTING. H o 3. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY PLANTS REQUIRED AS REFLECTED ON PLAN. E 4. ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL HAVE TOPSOIL PLACED AT MINIMUM DEPTH OF 4" FOR SOD AREAS, 12' FOR SHRUB/PERENNIAUANNUAL BEDS, AND 24" FOR TREE AREAS. 0 5. ALL PLANTING BEDS TO BE EDGED WITH STEEL EDGER, ANCHORED 4'-0" O.C. WITH METAL SPIKES, COLOR BLACK. 5. SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 4" IN DEPTH, FREE OF ALL 8 DELETERIOUS MATERIAL AND LOCATED IN ALL LANDSCAPE BEDS. 0 7. EXISTING TREES AND SHRUBS TO REMAIN THROUGHOUT THE PROPERTY SHALL BE PRUNED I a TO REMOVE DEAD OR UNDESIRABLE LIMBS AND TO SHAPE PLANT FOR DESIRABLE " APPEARANCE. PROTECT EXISTING TREES. S. CONTRACTOR TO DISPOSE OF ALL REMOVALS OFF-SITE. SEE EXISTING CONDITIONS & REMOVALS PLAN FOR MORE INFORMATION. 9. CONTRACTOR TO WARRANTY NEW SOD FOR 50 DAYS AND NEW PLANTINGS FOR ONE YEAR UPON PROJECT COMPLETION. 5 _$ 10. IRRIGATE WITH AUTOMATIC UNDERGROUND IRRIGATION SYSTEM AT ALL PLANTED AREAS. SYSTEM SHALL BE COMPLETE. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SHOP DRAWINGS FOR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS APPROVAL. K 11 REFER TO "THREE STEPS FOR PLANTING TREES AND SHRUBS" PUBLICATION BY THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF FOREST RESOURCES DATED DECEMBER 10, 2013 FOR PROPER PLANTING METHODS WEST END PRELIMINARY PLANT SCHEDULE SYMBOL QTY COMMON NAME SIZE ROOT OVERSTORY DECIDUOUS 35 .. 3" CAL. B & B COMMON HACKBERRY 3" CAL. B & B SKYLINE HONEYLOCUST 3" CAL. B & B SIENNA GLEN MAPLE 3" CAL. B & B PRINCETON ELM 3" CAL. .. IIID � CRIMSON SPIRE OAK 3" CAL. B & B NORTHERN RED OAK 3" CAL. B & B BOULEVARD LINDEN 3" CAL. B & B BLUE BEECH 3" CAL. B _&B it •• 63 SPRING SNOW CRABAPPLE 2' CAL. B & B RED SPLENDOR CRABAPPLE 2 -CAL ' B & B DAKOTA PINNACLE BIRCH 2" CAL. B & B JAPANESE TREE ULAC 7 CAL. B & B HAWTHORNE 2'CAL. B&B AUTUMN BRI .NE SERVICEBERRY Y CAL. B & B WHITESPIRE BIRCH Y CAL. B & B �ry Immm BLACK HILLS SPRUCE BHT B 8 B AUSTRIAN PINE V HT B 8 B U � W a� O • `` �—, si 1 t� fl�F I _s � WIN am�maamea'- � �1•WrB.aitevn ra.� R' i® d 6.#wN � INI_ l" I _1—'� 'M.AWMIf�1111 - .,� ®��° i �i _ (�, 1'..�esPc • �6WW�111®/{���®\�/ J v4i@ 'SIII �r 5 5, 79 - M LEVEL STALLS oil 21 169- UNDERGROUND STALLS Nonni l / 1�i�I Ua Agi�I'��AI t - SODDED. SOD IS TO BE PRIMARILY KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS, FREE OF LAWN GRASS AND WEEDS. REPLACE DAMAGED LAWN GRASS WITH SOD AS DIRECTED BY ONSITE REPRESENTATIVE. MATCH ALL PROPOSED LANDSCAPED AREAS INTO EXISTING. H o 3. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY PLANTS REQUIRED AS REFLECTED ON PLAN. E 4. ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL HAVE TOPSOIL PLACED AT MINIMUM DEPTH OF 4" FOR SOD AREAS, 12' FOR SHRUB/PERENNIAUANNUAL BEDS, AND 24" FOR TREE AREAS. 0 5. ALL PLANTING BEDS TO BE EDGED WITH STEEL EDGER, ANCHORED 4'-0" O.C. WITH METAL SPIKES, COLOR BLACK. 5. SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 4" IN DEPTH, FREE OF ALL 8 DELETERIOUS MATERIAL AND LOCATED IN ALL LANDSCAPE BEDS. 0 7. EXISTING TREES AND SHRUBS TO REMAIN THROUGHOUT THE PROPERTY SHALL BE PRUNED I a TO REMOVE DEAD OR UNDESIRABLE LIMBS AND TO SHAPE PLANT FOR DESIRABLE " APPEARANCE. PROTECT EXISTING TREES. S. CONTRACTOR TO DISPOSE OF ALL REMOVALS OFF-SITE. SEE EXISTING CONDITIONS & REMOVALS PLAN FOR MORE INFORMATION. 9. CONTRACTOR TO WARRANTY NEW SOD FOR 50 DAYS AND NEW PLANTINGS FOR ONE YEAR UPON PROJECT COMPLETION. 5 _$ 10. IRRIGATE WITH AUTOMATIC UNDERGROUND IRRIGATION SYSTEM AT ALL PLANTED AREAS. SYSTEM SHALL BE COMPLETE. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SHOP DRAWINGS FOR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS APPROVAL. K 11 REFER TO "THREE STEPS FOR PLANTING TREES AND SHRUBS" PUBLICATION BY THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF FOREST RESOURCES DATED DECEMBER 10, 2013 FOR PROPER PLANTING METHODS WEST END PRELIMINARY PLANT SCHEDULE SYMBOL QTY COMMON NAME SIZE ROOT OVERSTORY DECIDUOUS 35 SWAMP WHITE OAK 3" CAL. B & B COMMON HACKBERRY 3" CAL. B & B SKYLINE HONEYLOCUST 3" CAL. B & B SIENNA GLEN MAPLE 3" CAL. B & B PRINCETON ELM 3" CAL. B & B CRIMSON SPIRE OAK 3" CAL. B & B NORTHERN RED OAK 3" CAL. B & B BOULEVARD LINDEN 3" CAL. B & B BLUE BEECH 3" CAL. B _&B ( ORNAMENTAL DECIDUOUS 63 SPRING SNOW CRABAPPLE 2' CAL. B & B RED SPLENDOR CRABAPPLE 2 -CAL ' B & B DAKOTA PINNACLE BIRCH 2" CAL. B & B JAPANESE TREE ULAC 7 CAL. B & B HAWTHORNE 2'CAL. B&B AUTUMN BRI .NE SERVICEBERRY Y CAL. B & B WHITESPIRE BIRCH Y CAL. B & B �ry 3 BLACK HILLS SPRUCE BHT B 8 B AUSTRIAN PINE V HT B 8 B U � 01 SHRUBAND PERENNIAL BEDS 8.25D SO. FT. VIBURNUM 95 CONT. HYDRANGEA #5 CONT. DOGWOOD #5 CONT. ROSE #5 CONT. SPIREA #5 CONT. POTENTILLA #5 CONT. YEW 95 CONT. JUNIPER #5 CONT. ALERT TO CONTRACTOR: DAYLILY #1 CONT. w BLACK-EYED SUSAN #1 CONT. CATMINT 01 CONT. 1, THE PRESENCE OF GROUNDWATER SHOULD BE ANTICIPATED ON THIS PROJECT CONTRACTOR'S BID GARDEN PHLOX #1 CONT. J J HOSTA #1 COM. EXISTING WAYYATA BLVD I SHA LL INCLUDE CONSIDERATION FOR THIS ISSUE. WHEN PERFORMING GRADINGOPERATIONS ALL TI MESAFTERMILESTONE DATE. PURCHASER OFOUTLOTTOPROMDEPERMRDOCUMENTSAND Q O DURING PERIODS OF WET WEATHER, PROVI DE ADEQUATE DEWATERING, DRAINAGE AND GROUND Ui \ Q WATER MANAGEMENT TO CONTROL MOISTURE OF SOILS. REFER TO MASTER SITE SPECIFICATIONS. LLI / J 01 SHRUBAND PERENNIAL BEDS 8.25D SO. FT. VIBURNUM 95 CONT. HYDRANGEA #5 CONT. DOGWOOD #5 CONT. ROSE #5 CONT. SPIREA #5 CONT. POTENTILLA #5 CONT. YEW 95 CONT. JUNIPER #5 CONT. DWARF BUSH HONEYSUCKLE #5 CONT. DAYLILY #1 CONT. KARL FOERSTER #1 CONT. BLACK-EYED SUSAN #1 CONT. CATMINT 01 CONT. LITTLEBLUESTEM #1 CONT. GARDEN PHLOX #1 CONT. CONEFLOWER #1 CONT. HOSTA #1 COM. Z w ---- NATIVE PRAIRIE AREA 2,310 SO. FT. LITTLE BLUESTEM4" Z Q 4" POTS 2, ALLGENERAL CONTRACTOR WORKTO BE COMPLETED (EARTHWORK FINAL UTILITIES, AND FINAL 4" POTS w 4' POTS PRAIRIE DROPS1 GRADING) BY THE MILESTONE DATE IN PROJECT DOCUMENTS. OUTLCTAREATO BE KEPTFREEOF 0 SOD JOB TRAILERSANDSTORAGE AFTER THE CONTRACT MILESTONE DATE FORTHE OUROT.GENERAL CONTRACTORTO PROVIDE CLEAR ACCESS FOR OUTLOTCONTRACTORTOTHESPECIRCPARCELAT I AWIU CEPA Z w ALL TI MESAFTERMILESTONE DATE. PURCHASER OFOUTLOTTOPROMDEPERMRDOCUMENTSAND Q O SWPPP REQUIRED BY STATE/LOCAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SPECIFIC OUTLOT. Q 0- ~ U W u) U � O ---- NATIVE PRAIRIE AREA 2,310 SO. FT. LITTLE BLUESTEM4" POTS CONEFLOWER 4" POTS SWITCH GRASS 4" POTS PRAIRIE BLAZING STAR 4' POTS PRAIRIE DROPS1 4' POTS 0 SOD I AWIU CEPA O J 0 2 U) DATE 02/02/2015 PROJECT NO. GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 160755001 0 25 50 100 SHEET NUMBER 6100 0 I M I. I I . ` w W Z m m b a I I NI I c z a u c a m m e a J V I i a z 0 WOO'NHUH-A31HIAW" S IOZ�Z0�Z0 ilvu yy,,��1 0 V-599-199 3NOHd WUWy 0 w bl'is NW Ted 3 Doss X88 °3 3H (11, DSVHd) NV -1d WIN341SAH Ola Z o m NB£Z 3LIOS "g 3NV vdSN3AINN OSSZ - Z 1139WfIN 3SN30H NW SN D U,a�H �((/�aMf� Ae " ea°NW `J�3llH/� N3alOJ/>12i`dd Slf101 '1S oN w N]N0lVH 'd 0001 M1%3 03NDIS30 3 d V O Sa N V 1 � o o w 1S3M AHVd IVHIN90 N a `° :833NI0N3 NOIS30 31VOS O I I I I O F W W �1�:•s✓'a�'+��i�!'i' II w W Z m m b a CI w O � c z a u c a m m e a J mx a z � J NORTH z r z z �Q za O r r z z w> e < f �w$v�n Y H y$� f 2 a l! illIlyilgil!I IIimi w Z W R aw � a o � _z m� v <�mo} r � °W c llPllli6 11p1!III�p111i,,Ir'- W O = C <o ii > o o o m m < r z(7 az =q ~w o OU (-,�2 =O� a ZU m'4 o u LLI W a m mQW R a ❑ <J a 2p Fe zwma zr 00 �U a ZQw (7 m Q a `� z E Z O w 2 m U=O mW =� rc5 ioa m Z za vi a0, KLL rw g mm d v 3 w � IIIII o o C m a O C F gLL a n a WOW OW TJmo zd m0 wf a Za m< wm w S? p O ¢ U chi it N x CC< s; '� 1 e6 w0 m Op m u IIIIIIIIII 11 II'lllll:!Il�:i w o K m 6 I• -r" 0 a= 03 • 3 mm a z a 01 a■ t 'I W LU N m O Z ■,�'In il�ll�lll�ll� g w U "';� j w w ao � F a W U x Spz a n m taw 7 O Zr f�KO O , N 2 z > w p- � Woa a 9m 37 o ~ a o w No$ U 4a 8 52. Op� < Of Z r vi a • Q WOO'NHUH-A31HIAW" S IOZ�Z0�Z0 ilvu yy,,��1 0 V-599-199 3NOHd WUWy 0 w bl'is NW Ted 3 Doss X88 °3 3H (11, DSVHd) NV -1d WIN341SAH Ola Z o m NB£Z 3LIOS "g 3NV vdSN3AINN OSSZ - Z 1139WfIN 3SN30H NW SN D U,a�H �((/�aMf� Ae " ea°NW `J�3llH/� N3alOJ/>12i`dd Slf101 '1S oN w N]N0lVH 'd 0001 M1%3 03NDIS30 3 d V O Sa N V 1 � o o w 1S3M AHVd IVHIN90 N a `° :833NI0N3 NOIS30 31VOS O I I I I zWJW~ 0_ V O=O�Z 10 V a I I IL , 883 I I I� I � 1 i i' �z �w li,ll�s O F W W �1�:•s✓'a�'+��i�!'i' w Q0�Z w W Z m m b a mmo <Z I �iIrIR- m m e a J L; IY�I I � J NORTH z r z z �Q za O r r z z �V OO I f �w$v�n aN l! illIlyilgil!I IIimi w �rt O�wzm o � _z l! lili!'�jllji��i'�I��IlilYa li! !,li ,n.l ■,.fili,l■,li,■ a <�mo} r � zWJW~ 0_ V O=O�Z 10 V a I I IL , 883 I I I� I � 1 i i' �z �w li,ll�s I tl'I �1�:•s✓'a�'+��i�!'i' fO Is. m m a b m m b a fph �hlrs I j�l ijllll b',n 11 ■ ■ Illpll I �iIrIR- m m e a i _ _ L; IY�I I II�Plir�l U. r r z z z r z z IB�Y■�■ O r r z z L'In u , yl� u. II JI J,i, . .P I f a m m l! illIlyilgil!I IIimi w �rt mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmg�gq�ggggg�ggggRERR 'i!J! � _z l! lili!'�jllji��i'�I��IlilYa li! !,li ,n.l ■,.fili,l■,li,■ a r � o = II llPllli6 11p1!III�p111i,,Ir'- W O = C <o ii > o o o m m < r z(7 az =q ~w o OU (-,�2 =O� a ZU O LL Z-, a Z > > LL atl F O 4 id w m � LLO m > K 2 O w v ~ W a O W ) w o LL Z a 3 z z < a�= O S LLO m LLI W a m mQW R a ❑ <J a 2p Fe zwma zr 00 �U a ZQw (7 m Q a `� z E Z O w 2 m U=O mW =� rc5 ioa m Z za vi a0, KLL rw 'll IIID T fo.a 3 w CO zom IIIII o o C m a O C F gLL a n a p0 i = p ov KO m='�E' TJmo zd m0 wf a Za m< wm w S? p O ¢ U chi it Um �� a0 Fp m -a.0 g9a I I In I s; '� 1 e6 n -d IIIIIIIIII 11 II'lllll:!Il�:i 1'I�PIII�UTAII I• -r" m • e it 01 a■ t 'I W LU N I I '' ■,�'In il�ll�lll�ll� �aAMaw- U U U "';� In OZOF cerci QOO� ?N--w UO(9N tmOnt Uz�'n jOwU¢ WN R �fw° U �ww G�ur� Oa ;oma w0 ��Oy3 a�ap � aoee sw�o QE � oNo� °m �a0 mawN�w H s oz�Qnrc Uw°�� x Q .pQF ooaaoo 3<;0 3w��w, H z��o ooaoo< Oa � U 0z0zo°y� oia0rc O w� QmwO¢p .nUUE 2U<¢Nw wzU—'rc _ rc�a (7 O W �u,o3 auooQ3 Q -r:.'..?ff1rr Y43Flp,.a a'Q5.' f 'S..%iR'�, 'R�Fe,�� `•.:'ll +`c0 �1�:•s✓'a�'+��i�!'i' fO Is. m m a b m m b a �j�1".GI_ 5s�t"pi:3E5`•➢IL'•�altllf�iilE��17MJi.. m m .a .e m m e a �6iki L; IY�I I z r z z r r z z z r z z r r z z O r r z z r r� z z O F f m m m m w �rt mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmg�gq�ggggg�ggggRERR � _z a 8 o = g m O o m JN F6 y 3 p v a ,my w k' Cm S 0 O a w < O W W LL O w p LL O a w = W O = C <o ii > o o o m m < r z(7 az =q ~w o OU (-,�2 =O� a ZU O LL Z-, a Z > > LL atl F O 4 id w m � LLO m > K 2 O w v ~ W a O W ) w o LL Z a 3 z z < a�= O S LLO m LLI W a m mQW R a ❑ <J a 2p Fe zwma zr 00 �U a ZQw (7 m Q a `� z E Z O w 2 m U=O mW =� rc5 ioa m Z za vi a0, KLL rw T fo.a 3 w CO zom Z O arc o o C m a O C F gLL a n a p0 i = p ov KO m='�E' TJmo zd m0 wf a Za m< wm w S? p O ¢ U chi 3 O w �j O cQ Um �� a0 Fp m -a.0 g9a I I In I s; '� 1 e6 n -d d 1'I�PIII�UTAII I• -r" m l 01 a■ t 'I W LU N I I '' ■,�'In il�ll�lll�ll� �aAMaw- U U U "';� In • H • uolP+ Uo.Evy P o Vo -d sox. it -4x I— P.. --d - w U- (� T Y X\ o m m .e .e m m a b m m b a m m .e .e m m .a .e m m e a m m b b m m a a m z z z r z z r r z z z r z z r r z z O r r z z r r� z z O F f m m m m w �rt mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmg�gq�ggggg�ggggRERR � _z a 8 o = g m O o m JN F6 y 3 p v a ,my w k' Cm S 0 O a w < O W W LL O w p LL O a w = W O = C <o ii > o o o m m < r z(7 az =q ~w o OU (-,�2 =O� a ZU O LL Z-, a Z > > LL atl F O 4 id w m � LLO m > K 2 O w v ~ W a O W ) w o LL Z a 3 z z < a�= O S LLO m LLI W a m mQW R a ❑ <J a 2p Fe zwma zr 00 �U a ZQw (7 m Q a `� z E Z O w 2 m U=O mW =� rc5 ioa m Z za vi a0, KLL rw T fo.a 3 w CO zom Z O arc o o C m a O C F gLL a n a p0 i = p ov KO m='�E' TJmo zd m0 wf a Za m< wm w S? p O ¢ U chi 3 O w �j O cQ Um �� a0 Fp m -a.0 g9a W ao mw wF =a IWi fA arc vi e6 n -d d m (� uolP+ Uo.Evy P o Vo -d sox. it -4x I— P.. --d - w U- (� T Y X\ m m m m m .e .e m m a b m m b a m m .e .e m m .a .e m m e a m m b b m m a a m z z z r z z r r z z z r z z r r z z r r z z r r z z r r� z z r z z r m z m m m m w �rt mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmg�gq�ggggg�ggggRERR .e J W LU N J U J U U U U U In H Jm d }Q W Q a J a x w S2 a Z Z ) z O m o J a y Z K mW U g m U x K W V j } ¢ Q F W J 2 O W lUQQC 2 S Z Z O w W a Z m w Z Z O m U 3 S 0 c� z K fJ.1 O a 0 ZZ z W ~ W Q y m� x wa' a W y Z a N W m Q W g S = m C W m rc m O pj X O w x a, W % w a, g O Z m q g g p W CL U LL O x (7 z� O Z a Q m w a o` w m N p g = w a '� w O O a'WW a b y z ai N z s a. v z m m i'e m N p m cd 5 x a 3 u< g m a o ° m x> w rc "d m r 3 g �u a a 3¢ 7 S o r o 0 W 0 l w F z 3 rc a �a o 3 g Z x o rc o p m O x m 7 0 m a a m W W O mC1 Ng O co OO Fj O QZVf g0p0 Z IY O� a ,y Iy Q pas ma < z uolP+ Uo.Evy P o Vo -d sox. it -4x I— P.. --d - w U- (� T Y X\ WOTNHOH-A31111A ~ '310U L„1 Z6 -9V9-199 !3NOHd S l0Z/Z0/ZO wUWyl bll9S NW 'lf1Vd '15 006bZ ^� I` ,�^ a O O m N8£Z 3LINS '1S3M 3AV A11S83AINn ❑SSZ A6 03JI03H0 ``.1 `VJ JJ WUN341S32J MO o z O 11111111 3113❑Il NW 5 N �O M 9 A9 1Mva❑ �d`d�S4 Nb'� NW 'Al MVA N3OlOJ/>IHVd sinoi '1S Qo w uaoH ����V���� N3NOlVH 0401 �Ae 03NOI53❑ o o w 1S3M>QJVd IVAIN3O N a OCD :833NION3 NOIS3O 31VOS O N 1(7 C2 m i 0 0 0 F n mjo�rN U ¢azo ¢ F �z 00 r co U') co N w Q x W W O ¢ K Z � U W Z p Z a ON F w �� m z E Z m� 2 Y O x Od zw m - Zmm� m U Z N O ZfW Ww S Q O 13 U� FO m O- OFm Z O^ cG S i w O V mU ~ �Usil + + U� 0 Q o Q N D o OF o a Q N= N oYo a m? wx o mm m as oz W J UU Q w z OM. Irma Z NU Om J J W ZZ Q .. ® �Ea 0O Fz"S O F tin tt 7Q M U U z Z<N Q QoI` O� d O Z N = ? f 2 fw Q O rr 3 �O o w� F N o U N U n o F oQ ¢�� Z N zR (� Z U Um a a z ww } w W Z o V Z I O D � O IJ F O W U W m O O Q �o O z oo O w w zwio a J� Q Ujd o H m� 2 Y O x Od zw m - Zmm� m m ¢Jp J m mF, �U d� m O JAZ Z N a o oz w E 3 - _ o � O O ZfW Ww S Q¢ o p N mO �J r'm 2j o w QOOF . w m t p Q z p m V O Wo z" QE m V m z W - O z > azKumi - wpZ �SK 3a a wm v� aUwa In ¢w fm m + + Z + + + dm N D o OF + I I LU a o Y . m 00 za - - m 0 Q w z j. rs C5 p W O _ Q 5 7D O 2 ..F — C7 Owd Qo J 0 QoI` O� } m ~ a w z Io p f 2 mo, It — y dll „b i F Z o V ¢ W Q 7 W I N m m F O W U W m U O w w zwio Q O m z _ N ¢ —w o ZfW Ww S m 1 O o p ovw� ¢w fm m N zl<a dz3 �'w Po: w dm N D o OF 43 O J wo ma a o Y w�� m 00 za - - m 3w Q w z N rs C5 p W QKZ Q 5 ovmi m o�J�Q iii O o Na ¢ m~ m r 4 W V rWW-i > > o> Q Oa K� E\ S ZNF Z ao mz zQ o F oQ ¢�� F O O m Y~JQ 30 3j <2mr oo 'i> 16. zR �a e8z a m NO J ] E EU wIE U o�Z Z ZZ mp¢ } w 0- E �¢ nnZ L]Om Q 00 Z d W O U C d 0 N U N M U1 r0 I� N + + V J como + Oz V O E O ¢F zz F=M,)cD Y U + a m U m ¢ w O z ¢ FZ txn� Huai m Q oda Z. �o 1 / 'loo pw _ _ � 100 Q mud It z am a 0 Z o V ¢ W Q 7 W I N m m F O W U W m z O w w zwio a oo m z J O m W a U O p m Q a i� lo x _m FOW mm v O 3 z z w3m OU w m ¢oQa O 4W Nw oW N Uzw mmo Z m m `��o Q oOzwN O oN Q U u o a o 'o zF' m �'w Po: w =om `�z} m¢Jmz _ i �ow4 o}ate a x m= �' 10 m O Z �� m <�pw Z�ioa 3w C rs O 3m ovmi m o�J�Q iii O U U3w F" o O d 4 W V rWW-i > > o> Q Q 2 N 0 0 R N V OJ ao Q mW �x O K ap NQ 3 0 d ttro0 rel O Ztt F O O m Y~JQ 30 3j <2mr oo 'i> 16. ¢ W m O Q Z �o Jo Q wz oN W U x _ V J como Oz V O E O ¢F zz F=M,)cD Y U NgO J �¢N � _O ? _ _ � o Q W oJ z am z11 wvlo w € maw o iw oo,ar� J o F aN ¢ oN Jowwwaa�Q u~i aQ m Uz �omo� oNoow1 xaww.wa zm���> x N ¢ �Z w mOzw Z ow o¢wll= j _>o'^mow 3 asJ�awa Zm Z im OQW OF �Z(nZ 0 Z mXttOJ J ~Z IJ c�W p wu 2 ZONIJ w ¢ QQ<Zm ¢Q� zw0 'o a� a�JF�k'¢l J0 m0 ¢OFO zW p zJ dQQ o o O in oK z0¢mw Ja€p owo.zacY.+am �� w w '6�� wUp 2 Na ri N.- 63���3�i'^ro �p hS m a 9 a _ O o Z o V ¢ W Q 7 W I N m m F O W U W m Z F I¢¢ Qm aoo O w w zwio a oo m z J Q n 2 J m W a U O p m Q a i� lo x _m FOW mm v O 3 z z w3m OU w m ¢oQa O 4W Nw oW N Uzw mmo ~ ZO s m z <a m 3 oo aw a m� oa �' nop wz�f - P. w ww J Q p a oQo mm W UzZ �a>Qz .ott �� ooF�<w z Q U rlg } p mNN � ON W Z OF � zwoom owFz Z z O a y O>Y m Z J ¢ r:joKw �UQo K mmN Z ONS nn Uo _ J w W w X O J F- LU 0 c7 Z 0 Z Y f- cn >p— pup uu IwIM 11 e Q OD y pup u U aWsu LL U atul c 2y> ew 6ep P.. e)tle>up> e — 1Y I 2' 1 IT 01 my DR 1 rr o- za c p A m z m z 0 r � I — 3 O � �ecillc pu rpcee and tlient for m I m I v I 0 I w D 'Ne° pr P h it a Bred. R.— of and i preper I—— on title document witf,out wrltlen au tnerize[lon and j{} Kmle M nlll[ t —ptpt- Ey I y— orn and A...c tee, Inc. Snell pe without Ilo y o Klmley—Mwn u�a ..s_�.. .. �. SCALE DESIGNED BY �W 2.... III m X - _ z D ! D Z m Z DRAWN BY Z m N D Cit y J {R����� B'R LS moo , _ I c m0 m - 0 O O o 71 M D 1 J T m r, ; >m >m� s PLAN CHECKED BY TOPM 0c: -- -- -- -- zmED t 02/02/2015 DATE: WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM O A t t�. 1 1 1 0 1 (1 L4 4 1 } I I I 11111111111H N r 'D --z =m am�>i:m swim � oaAAm� ap�� � ° ° O Poim� no ° �sa°�y ;oim C7 <yo�m �01' O yomnz z m>oo momma im�� ��'7J mnn1m°Apy n Opmm v° �ai0 O pjyp�p im z �rctyDivm vvmz. O< p5n Hoymg mm sF �gmy °p p�oQ O'Ho 1 ;R�2a mm o=y o� o �o"1 0 o �Or � mz z00 =O �mF Cu <� ryA >z N -`T4 m n��D; mc I �� N�0m� 0 NZND1 AmNNro OG) I rz oz=0-1 NN° zo A -- I - TT VJ _ m 0O N OO CENTRAL PARK WEST LANDSCAPE SCALE DESIGNED BY �W DESIGN ENGINEER: rood P. HawNEN Kimley>>> Horn z J N \ N� ST. LOUIS PARK/GOLDEN VALLEY, MN PRESERVATION DRAWN BY Cit y {R����� B'R LS MN LICENSE NUMBER co m 0 O O o DLC RESIDENTIAL 2550 UNIVERSITY AVE WEST, SUITE 238N � PLAN CHECKED BY TOPM 24900 57. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE: 651-645-4197 02/02/2015 DATE: WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM N W Al cn m J co ID 0 N w U1 8 r '. 0 ti " 6 a .. z v m 00 O NOD 'NNOH-A31HIN"MMM 461* -949-199 3NOHd 'jltlU yy,�� V4&1 IwIN oc 41111pP11 ino4llM ap IIP i M �tina Q ¢ apWec ;a 'ulayay pa asautl . t Q m () btl99 N%,OVd '13 NBFZ 3LIOS 'MM 3AV A11SN3AINN O9SZ 006bZ A903H03H� Nb']d J�I�NOOM IVLN3aIS3la Ola � Z XIDM LO $ B Ae NMVNO N39WNN 35N3011 N% N N uaoH �<<�(a�uui� aN`d �12�dd NW 13��t1n N3a�oJi�l2itfd slnoi is 1S3M NaVd Wb ao �� w o o a cO w N]Nn]VH 'd 4401 MW to 03NOIS30 2MMON3 NOIS30 MJIN3O N O 21vis cull F .-v s 9i ; _ $ . u i i .uici. .� �. I Air10o g N of ag C� y5F ii L� tt�� ww FF U ¢ew CQ ¢ a pp F U aip$pp9a F�am wou�o8 asap � aoWY N>r UOU �1.-orc owo°tee NaN U¢°wo �'O� oo�wob' Z 10HO Gwo>w� u ¢ per, ir�m �c¢s w o o¢w 011. jllf o s J � � K a� U m C IwIN oc 41111pP11 ino4llM ap IIP i M �tina Q ¢ apWec ;a 'ulayay pa asautl . t Q m () jllf o s J � a Z .x 1 i M �tina Q ¢ apWec ;a 'ulayay pa asautl aid c .....d a Q W LL A . r 0 jllf o s J � ti U w W 11 Z_ W Q O U S � a� a c� 0 I I I I 4 I' I y. Q J a au61�P P c;0apuoo a '� Z i M �tina Q ¢ apWec ;a 'ulayay pa asautl _ yce6o� — Y .,O' d e' n A94 E M 0 valley Planning Department 763-593-8095 / 763-593-8109 (fax) Date: To: From: March 9, 2015 Golden Valley Planning Commission Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager Subject: Informal Public Hearing — Zoning Text Amendment — Size of Accessory Structures The Zoning Code currently requires a building permit for accessory structures only if they exceed 120 square feet in area, consistent with the State Building Code requirements. In 2015, the State Building Code was revised to only require building permits for accessory structures if they exceed 200 square feet. Staff is recommended a zoning text amendment in order to keep our requirements consistent with those of the State. This change requires an amendment to two sections of code: Chapter 11.21, Subd. 12(E) which sets the threshold for which a building permit is required and Chapter 11.21, Subd. 12(J) which limits the type of roofs allowed on accessory structures to those over 120 square feet. Attachments Underlined-Overstruck Zoning Code Language (1 page) 1 Single Family Residential § 11.21 A. Provision for garage. No building permit shall be issued for a single family dwelling not having a two (2) stall garage unless the registered survey submitted at the time of the application for the building permit reflects the necessary area and setback requirements for a future two (2) stall (minimum) garage. B. Cornices and Eaves. Cornices and eaves may not project more than thirty (30) inches into a required setback. Source: Ordinance No. 292, 2nd Series Effective Date: 3-12-04 C. Each property is limited to a total of one thousand (1,000) square feet of the following accessory structures: detached and attached garages, detached sheds, greenhouses, and gazebos. Swimming pools are not included in this requirement. No one (1) detached accessory structure may be larger than eight hundred (800) square feet in area and any accessory structure over one hundred twenty e124) two hundred (200) square feet in area requires a building permit. Source: Ordinance No. 382, 2"d Series Effective Date: 3-28-08 D. Size of Accessory Structures. No accessory structure shall be larger in size than the principal structure. (See Subdivision 4,A(1)). E. Swimming pools. Swimming pools shall meet the same setback and location requirements for accessory structures. Setbacks shall be measured from the property line to the pool's edge. Decks surrounding above ground pools shall meet setback requirements. F. Decks. Free standing decks or decks attached to accessory buildings shall meet the same setback requirements for accessory buildings. (See Subdivision 16.) G. Central Air Conditioning Units. Central air conditioning units shall not be allowed in the front yard of a single family home. Source: Ordinance No. 292, 2nd Series Effective Date: 3-12-04 H. Roof. Gambrel and Mansard roofs are not permitted on any accessory building with a footprint of more than two hundred JZQ0J square feet. Source: Ordinance No. 382, 2nd Series Effective Date: 3-28-08 Date: March 9, 2015 Planning Department 763-593-8095 / 763-593-8109 (fax) To: Golden Valley Planning Commission From: Emily Goellner, Associate Planner/Grant Writer Subject: Discussion on Reducing Hotel Parking Requirements The City Manager has directed Staff to examine the Zoning Code in relation to minimum parking requirements for hotel uses to determine if the existing minimum should be reduced. The current regulation requires 1.5 parking spaces per unit plus parking for other uses (typically offices or a restaurant). Hotels are permitted in the Commercial and Industrial Zoning Districts. They are also permitted in the 1-394 Mixed Use Zoning District within a mixed use building. Hotels are a conditional use in the 1-394 Mixed Use Zoning District in a free standing building. Currently, there are two hotels located in Golden Valley. The Super 8 is located at 6300 Wayzata Boulevard and the Holiday Inn is located at 6051 Golden Hills Drive. Both are located in the 1-394 Mixed Use Zoning District as free standing buildings. Representatives of Super 8 approached City staff with interest in expanding the hotel to include additional rooms. However, the proposed addition would require more parking spaces than the property can accommodate. Representatives of Super 8 requested that the City explore the possibility of reducing the minimum parking requirement for hotels. For staff's reference, representatives provided a summary of parking requirements in surrounding municipalities (attached) and a summary of results from parking counts completed on the Super 8 property in summer of 2014 (attached). Attachments City Code Section 11.70, Subdivision 3, Off -Street Parking Regulations (1 page) Summary of Parking Requirements for Surrounding Jurisdictions (1 page) Registered Vehicles for Guests Staying at the Super 8 in Golden Valley (1 page) § 11.70 COMMERCIAL cont. 1 space per 5 students based on design capability Trade and Training School Source: Ordinance No. 482, 2nd Series Effective Date: 4-27-12 1 space per 25 s.f. of customer area. Bakery Source: Ordinance No. 346, 2nd Series Effective Date: 7-1-06 1 space per 3.5 seats ------------------ Clubs/Lodges Source: Ordinance No. 482, 2nd Series Effective Date: 4-27-12 Convention/Exhibition Hall _ 1 space per 3 seats Hotel or Motel 1.5 spaces per unit plus parking for other --- uses. ----- Places of Lodging —-- -------------____._._- See Hotel Service Station Motor Fuel Station ---------- 8 s aces plus 4per service stall. Motor Vehicle Service Repair ------4 spaces for each service bay. __ Offices 1 space per 250 s.f. of gross floor area._ Mortuaries 1 per every 250 s.f. plus 1 space for — every 5 seats. -- — - ---_- Car Wash 8 spaces plus 4 per service stall. Medical Clinic Offices 1 space per 200 s.f. of gross floor area Open Sales or Rental Lots 1 space per 2000 s.f. of display area Printing 1 space per each 100 s.f. of customer service area. Bowling Alley _ 1 space per each 6 seats or 300 s.f. of _ ross floor area, whichever is greater. Pool Hall/Arcade 1 space per 50 s.f. 1 space per each 6 seats or 300 s.f. of Skating Rinks gross floor area of rink area, whichever isgreater. 1 space for every 200 s.f. of gross floor Sport & Health Clubs area of non -court area plus 2 spaces for each court plus 1 per 50 s.f. deck area for swimming. Theater and/or Gymnasiums (Auditorium) 1 space per 4 seats or 1 space per 400 s.f., whichever is greater. Restaurant Class_I Traditional -No Liquor) 1 space per 100 s.f. of gross floor area Restaurant - Class II Fast Food 1 space per 40 s.f. of gross floor area Restaurant -Class III (Restaurant W/ Liquor) 1 space per 60 s.f. of floor area plus 1 s ace per 25 s.f. of bar area. Retail Store or Service Establishment 1 space per 250 s.f. of gross floor area Shopping Center 1 space for every 200 s.f. of gross floor area. 5 spaces per 1000 Golden Valley City Code Page 9 of 13 Summary of Parking requirements for surrounding Jurisdictions. Maple Grove, Minnesota o One space per each rental unit, plus one space per each ten units, and one space for each employee on any shift. 0 1:l .1 parking ratio 0 This would require our proposed property to have 140 stalls + 14 stalls +-3 stalls = Total of 157 parking stalls • Plymouth, Minnesota o One space per sleeping unit, plus one space per day shift employee 0 1:1 parking ratio o This would require our proposed property to have 140 stalls +3 stalls = Total of 143 parking stalls Minnetonka, Minnesota o One space per room and One space per employee during major business hours. (per Susan with the city) 0 1:1 parking ratio o This would require our proposed property to have 140 stalls +3 stalls -_- Total of 143 parking stalls • Bloomington, Minnesota o Parking Space per unit (per Denis with the city) a 1:l parking ratio o This would require our proposed property to have 140 stalls =- Total of 140 parking stalls Wayzata, Minnesota 0 1 space per lodging unit plus spaces equal to 25% of the capacity of any club or lodges. 0 1:1 parking ratio o This would require our proposed property to have 140 stalls = Total of 140 parking stalls • Eden Prairie, Minnesota 0 1:1 o Have also re -written their ordinance for certain areas of the city called town center. Registered Vehicles for Guests Staying at the Super 8 in Golden Valley. This is based on the dates with the highest occupancy for the summer of 2014. This shows that the hotel is not currently utilizing the amount of parking that they currently have, and that a ratio of 1 guest room to 1 parking stall would be sufficient for the proposed remodel of the property. • 6/4 - 72 registered vehicles, 99% occupancy • 6/11 - 73 registered vehicles , 99% occupancy • 6/23 - 81 registered vehicles, 97% occupancy • 7/12 - 82 registered vehicles , 100 occupancy • 7/21 - 77 registered vehicles , 99% occupancy • 7/24 - 75 registered vehicles, 99% occupancy • 8/2 - 84 registered vehicles, 98% occupancy • 8/12 - 69 registered vehicles, 97% occupancy • 8/22 - 72 registered vehicles, 100% occupancy • 8/25 - 68 registered vehicles, 97% occupancy Date: March 9, 2015 a u X15 I I� i .gar lk Planning Department 763-593-8095 / 763-593-8109 (fax) To: Golden Valley Planning Commission From: Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager Subject: Zoning Interpretation of R-1 Side Yard Setbacks At the direction of the City Manager, Staff are bringing forward the current zoning language related to R-1 side yard setbacks for examination and possible modification. Recent questions regarding the interpretation of the zoning code have necessitated a review of the evolution of these requirements and the best ways to apply them going forward. Based on discussion and feedback at the Planning Commission, specific text amendments will be brought to a future meeting for consideration. History In 2006, the City Council directed the Planning Commission to respond to community concerns regarding the scale of remodeled and infill housing in Golden Valley. This initiated an almost two year process during which the Planning Commission produced a "Report on Subdivisions and Development" (also known as the "Infill Report") and eventually brought recommendations to the City Council regarding building height, side yard setbacks, and side wall articulation. These changes were adopted in March of 2008. In addition to reducing the maximum allowed height of principal structures in the R-1 zoning district, the side yard setbacks were modified to vary depending on the height of the home on the lot. As the height of a structure increased above 15 feet, so did the required setback from the side lot line. In order to accommodate existing homes and allow for future expansions, a clause was approved that allowed an existing structure to remain conforming in its current location, while any addition to the structure would be set back as dictated by the new language. This discussion gave rise to the idea of a tiered "wedding cake" shape for homes with additions or expansions. It appears to have been the intent of the Planning Commission and City Council at the time that for new construction the entire building would be set behind the increased setback. At some point in the intervening years—Staff is working to pinpoint when—this method of determining setbacks for additions also became the standard for new construction. This means that instead of the side setback being applied to the entire building, it was applied only to the portion of the building greater than 15 feet in height. The result has been the construction of new homes that have the "wedding cake" shape previously intended only for remodeled homes. Current Situation Staff in the Physical Development Department believe the methods of interpretation that are currently being used are ones that work well and that in order to continue reviewing and enforcing height and side setbacks in this manor, the zoning language should be modified to more accurately reflect these interpretations. As originally intended, the height of a building was determined based on the front elevation of the structure and the increased setback distances were applied uniformly on both sides of the lot. As it is currently being applied, the maximum height of a building is still limited based on the front elevation (or street side) of the home, but the side setbacks are determined based on the height of each side elevation and applied independently. Also, as mentioned above, rather than being applied to the entire structure, the increased setbacks are applied to each portion or plane of the structure, allowing a "stepped back" form to be constructed. Potential Modifications Modifying the zoning text to more clearly reflect these interpretations would require changes in at least two areas. The first would revise the setback language to accommodate the "wedding cake" approach described above. Example: In the case of lots having a width of one hundred (100) feet or greater, the side setbacks for any portion of a structures fifteen (15) feet or less in height shall be fifteen (15) feet. The side setbacks for any portion of a structure greater than fifteen (15) feet in height shall be fifteen (15) feet plus one-half (0.5) foot for each additional one (1) foot (or portion thereof) of structure height over fifteen (15) feet; The second would require a modification or addition to the height definition in order to determine each side setback independently based on the height of each side elevation. Currently, Staff have calculated the average height of each elevation taken at three points along the building line. The result of this calculation is that a home with a walkout is determined to have a greater height than one without, thereby requiring a greater side setback. Alternately, the height for each side elevation could be determined at the respective front corner of the building on the street side. This would allow for different side setbacks based on the massing on either side of the home while not penalizing the homeowner for having a walkout. Other Considerations In addition to revisiting the height and side setback requirements, there are a handful of other questions that have been raised over time around which Staff have developed unwritten policies. Depending on how the Planning Commission views these issues, language could be developed to incorporate the policies into the zoning code so that it is clear to builders and residents how various aspects of massing are being applied. The area of greatest uncertainty surrounds the articulation requirement. Common questions from builders include: 1. Does the articulation need to be applied from grade to the roof line? Can it be applied to only a portion of the elevation (i.e., one story out of two)? 2. Would an appropriately sized chimney chase qualify as articulation? 3. Would a bay window qualify as articulation? 4. Would cantilevered floor space qualify as articulation? 5. Can any of the above be placed within the side setback area? 6. Is the articulation requirement applied only to new walls being constructed, or any wall that is over 32' in length at the conclusion of construction? Attachments Sample elevations (2 pages) Sample Front Elevation 6" TRM BOARD — COLOR WHITE HORZ. LP SUNG — (6' C0.0R: CRANIE 4 Wy BONG COLOR: MITE SM007H PANEL COLON: MATE BA SUPPORT POST Orae STORE BASE 14'41A' TAPERED MOM) OLLWR AN YL SHAKES COEdt COASTAL SAGE 6' TRIM ROAM COLOR, MIN 6" TRIM BO COLOR MIN NORZ LP SUNG C0.q+: CIiANTE sr 4 DOA BOARD COLOR: MATE SMOOTH PANEL CMOR MATE B.6 SUPWRT POST Wae STORE BASE U'z34" TAPERED M00D COLUMN B�meeeBlmlr � � � i M. �• fACJA t S01TTT COLOR MITE a"S COUNTY TYP. B' TNM BOARIT — - COLDR: ARIM ANT^ SNAKE -- COIOR -Al— SMF 1 .._ 1 C"k Orsi& WE �--- SOW BONG COED! MITE 1 t1 1 BI�NBBBY[ BIIBp)l � �� t�A � 9y�BK U S M. 1I 9110. QCIA OLOIt SM - gfi.,sow Dm OwAt "CIE SHAKES --'� M•-.) NN1 COLD" COA:il AI. SAGE 1 4/1!1Bd fA00 A: MITE S 1 COLOR MITE 1 �i i r © ! 1 - - 1 CLOPAY DOgt, RNIB A1111E OIBFBO 1 1 MODEL 150. STONE - WSCAN LYDGESTONE MNWN STYLE TO 8E PRN E— BUCITS ONE CWNIY IYP. ENISF COLOR TO CE MATE WNS C0104n TW. 1 I B' MM ROAM -- TIERMA TRV DOOR, 1 1 C0.NANMIN CCELNYE SHAKES — _ fNI&I COLOR TO W NPItE 6' TRIM BOARD 1 I Cd.OR COASTAL SAGE COLQt: WHITE 1 setback line BOARD 1 WHITE setback line SHAKES :: COASTAL SHOE Once the structure is greater than 15' in height, the additional portions of the structure must be stepped back at the 2:1 rate. Once the structure is greater than 15' in height, the entire structure must shift back at the 2:1 rate. Sample Side Elevation Methods of determining side elevation height include 1) taking the average of three points vs. measuring the height at the front corner and 2) measuring the height to the bottom of the soffit vs. measuring to the average of the pitched roof. a� Methods of determining side elevation height include 1) taking the average of three points vs. measuring the height at the front corner and 2) measuring the height to the bottom of the soffit vs. measuring to the average of the pitched roof.