The URL can be used to link to this page

04-21-15 CC Agenda Packet AGENDA Regular Meeting of the City Council Golden Valley City Hall 7800 Golden Valley Road Council Chamber April 21, 2015 6:30 pm The Council may consider item numbers 1, 2, 3, 5 and 6 prior to the public hearings scheduled at 7 pm 1. CALL TO ORDER PAGES A. Roll Call B. Pledge of Allegiance 2. ADDITIONS AND CORRECTIONS TO AGENDA 3. CONSENT AGENDA Approval of Consent Agenda - All items listed under this heading are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no discussion of these items unless a Council Member or citizen so requests in which event the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda. A. Approval of Minutes 1. City Council Special Meeting - Administrative Hearing - April 7, 2015 3-4 2. City Council Meeting - April 7, 2015 5-12 B. Approval of Check Register 1. City 13 2. Housing and Redevelopment Authority 14 C. Licenses: 1. Gambling License Exemption and Waiver of Notice Requirement - School of 15-17 Engineering and Arts - Parent Teacher Association 2. Gambling Premises License Application - Minnesota/USA Wrestling, Inc. 15-33 18-19 3. Solicitor's License - Fund for the Public Interest 20-22 D. Minutes of Boards and Commissions: 1. Planning Commission - March 23, 2015 23-33 2. Human Rights Commission - February 24, 2015 34-36 E. Bids and Quotes: 1. Purchase Galaxy Radio Transmitter Modules for Water Meter Reading System 37 Upgrade 2. Authorize Contract for 2015 Brookview Golf Course Pond Buffer Implementation 38-57 F. Approve requests for Beer and/or Wine at Brookview Park 58-59 G. Authorize a Corrected Certification of Special Assessments 15-34 60-61 H. Authorize General Fund Transfer to Building Improvement Fund 15-35 62-66 I. Receipt of March 2015 Financial Reports 67-75 J. Authorize the Revision of Municipal State Aid Street Routes 15-36 76-79 K. Proclamation for National Public Works Week 80-81 L. Proclamation for the Annual National Fibromyalgia Awareness Celebration 82 M. Bottineau LRT Business Advisory Council Appointment 83 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS 7 PM A. Public Hearing - Ordinance #553 - Amending Section 11.70 Reducing Hotel Minimum 84-93 Parking Requirement B. Public Hearing - Preliminary PUD Plan for CenterPoint Energy - PUD No. 122 - 6161 94-146 Golden Valley Rd - CenterPoint Energy, Applicant 5. OLD BUSINESS 6. NEW BUSINESS A. First Consideration - Ordinance #554 - Amendment to Sections 6.34: Tobacco and 147-157 10.67: Smoke Free Environment to prohibit sale and use of e-cigarettes in public and work places B. First Consideration - Ordinance #555 - Amendment of Salaries of Mayor and Council 158-165 Members C. METRO Blue Line Extension Update 166-167 D. Bottineau LRT Community Works Steering Committee Appointments 168-170 E. Announcements of Meetings F. Mayor and Council Communications 7. ADJOURNMENT C1t "L`?�µ UNOFFICIAL MINUTES f SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL GOLDEN VALLEY, MINNESOTA April 7, 2015 The meeting began at 5:30 pm. The following members were present: Mayor Harris, Council Members Clausen, Snope, Schmidgall and Fonnest. Also present were: City Manager Thomas Burt; Police Chief Stacy Carlson; City Attorney Allen Barnard; and City Clerk Kris Luedke Administrative Hearing - Appeal of Alcohol Sales Violation - Nong's Thai Cuisine - 2520 Hillsboro Avenue North Mayor Harris opened the meeting and introduced City Attorney Allen Barnard. City Attorney Barnard presented an overview of the administrative hearing process and answered questions from the Council. Mr. Barnard administered the oath to those who were present to testify: Police Chief Carlson and Mr. Paul Ratnasingha. Police Chief Carlson presented the staff report, outlined the timeline of events and the violations that had occurred and answered questions from Council. Mr. Ratnasingha, owner of the establishment, stated he was upset in regards to what happened and that he follows the law. He said he conducts alcohol training to his employees and that 2 years ago he had the Golden Valley Police Department also provide a training session. He explained on the day of the alcohol sale suspension, he posted a sign in the kitchen on the refrigerator to not sell alcohol and told everyone about it. He said he had stepped out in the afternoon and the same person who sold liquor to a minor at the previous violation then sold alcohol to the undercover officer. He said the person is no longer working for him that he had let her go. He said he did not fire her after the first incident because he wanted to give her another chance but then she did it again. He said the employee in question had attended the alcohol trainings. He asked if there is anything he can do to reduce the violation because he would do it. He stated he has been open for 5 years and has 3 violations counting this one at the restaurant. He said he is concerned he will not be able to stay in business because the sale of alcohol is about 10% of his total sales. He answered questions from Council. Mr. Barnard answered questions from Council. MOVED by Council Member Snope, seconded by Council Member Clausen and the motion carried unanimously to make the following finding and determination; Finding A violation of Section 5.02, of the Golden Valley City Code, occurred and the penalty in the City Code shall be applied. Unofficial Special City Council Minutes -2- April 7, 2015 Determination The liquor license shall be revoked from Nong's Thai Cuisine located at 2520 Hillsboro Avenue North. Adjournment The Mayor adjourned the meeting at 5:57 pm. Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk 6ty Of 19k UNOFFICIAL MINUTES CITY COUNCIL MEETING GOLDEN VALLEY, MINNESOTA .11 April 7, 2015 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Harris called the meeting to order at 6:30 pm. 1A. Roll Call Present: Mayor Harris, Council Members Clausen, Schmidgall, Snope and Fonnest 1 B. Pledge of Allegiance The Boy Scouts of Troup 476 lead the Council in the Pledge of Allegiance. 1 C. Board/Commission Oath of Office and Presentation of Certificate of Appointment Mayor Harris administered the Oath of Office and presented a Certificate of Appointment to Denise LaMere-Anderson who was appointed to the Human Services Fund. 1 D. Proclamation for Genocide Awareness and Prevention Month - April 2015 Members of the Human Rights Commission presented the Proclamation to the Council. MOTION made by Council Member Snope, seconded by Council Member Fonnest to sign the Proclamation for Genocide Awareness Month and the motion carried unanimously. 2. ADDITIONS AND CORRECTIONS TO AGENDA MOTION made by Council Member Fonnest, seconded by Council Member Clausen to approve the agenda of April 7, 2015, as submitted and the motion carried unanimously. 3. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA MOTION made by Council Member Fonnest, seconded by Council Member Clausen to approve the consent agenda of April 7, 2015, as revised: removal of 3F-Ordinance #548 amending Chapter 12 on Subdivision Regulations, 3J- Resolution accepting a donation for a memorial bench, 3M-Resolution authorizing execution of agreement with Urban Hennepin County and for Jewish Housing and Programming and 3N-Resolution supporting improvements to the 36-Inch pipe for water service for the Joint Water Commission Cities and the motion carried unanimously. 3A1. Approve Minutes of the Strategic Planning Retreat - February 5, 2015 3A2. Approve Minutes of the Strategic Planning Retreat - February 23, 2015 3A3. Approve Minutes of the Strategic Planning Retreat - March 12, 2015 3A4. Approve Minutes of the Strategic Planning Retreat - March 14, 2015 3A5. Approve Minutes of the City Council Meeting - March 17, 2015 3131. Approve City Check Register and authorize the payments of the bills as submitted. 3132. Approve Housing and Redevelopment Authority check register and authorize the payments of the bills as submitted. 3C1. Receive and file the gambling license exemption and approve the waiver of notice requirement for Fundraising Bankers. 3C2. Receive and file the gambling license exemption and approve the waiver of notice requirement for Sons of the American Legion Post 523. 3C3. Approve solicitor's license for James Hardie Building Products. 3C4. Authorize issuance of General licenses as recommended by staff. Unofficial City Council Minutes -2- April 7, 2015 3. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA - continued 3C5. Authorize issuance of Multi-Family Rental Property licenses as recommended by staff. 3C6. Authorize issuance of a Therapeutic Massage Facility License for Core Healing Arts LLC located at 1405 North Lilac Drive, Suite 113D. 3D. Accept for filing the Minutes of Boards and Commissions as follows: 1. Planning Commission - March 9, 2015 2. Environmental Commission - February 23, 2015 3. Teen Committee - December 22, 2014 4. Human Rights Commission - February 24, 2015 5. Joint City Council and Planning Commission - February 9, 2015 6. Joint Environmental Commission and Open Space and Recreation Commission - February 23, 2015 7. Bassett Creek Watershed Commission - February 19, 2015 3E1. Adopt Resolution 15-26, Authorizing Cooperative Construction Agreement with the State of Minnesota Transportation Department. 3E2. Authorize a contract to Century Fence Company in the amount of$22,465.40 for the 2015 Pavement Marking Project, City Project No. 15-04. 3E3. Award a contract for the 2015 Asphalt Overlay Project to the lowest responsible bidder, Omann Brothers Paving, Inc., for the Base Bid and Alternate Bid 1, in the amount of$599,916.99. 3E4. Award a contract for the Twin Lake Alum Treatment Project to the lowest responsible bidder, HAB Aquatic Solutions, in the amount of$39,340. 3E5. Approve purchase of one Dodge Charger Police Sedan from Nelson Auto Center for the total purchase price of$30,063.71. 3E6. Approve the purchase of the E45 T4 Bobcat Compact Excavator from Tri-State Bobcat, Inc. for the total amount of$54,600. 3E7. 1. Approve purchase of two Vehicle Maintenance Hoists from Rotary Lift in the amount of, including freight, $17,020.83. 2. Approve installation of two vehicle maintenance hoists from Lube-Tech in the amount of$11,600. 3. Approve engineering services for hoist installation from Environmental Process, Inc. in the amount of$4,800. 3F. Adopt seGend GGRsideFatien, GFdmnanre #548, Amending Chapter 12-. Subdivis-OR Regulations (Platting), FegapdiRg ModifiGations frem the 2015 2015 Subdivision Study. 3G. Approve issuance of an On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor License with Sunday Sale to ShoGun Golden Valley Inc. d/b/a Sushi X, located at 6440 Wayzata Boulevard. 3H. Approve requests for beer and/or wine at Brookview Park as recommended by staff. 31. Approve an extension for submittal of the Final PUD Plan application for Golden Villas q , PUD� PFNpo. 118 until October 4, 2015. 3i�—Adopt eselUtFORr15-s7,AGGec'pting Donation From the Family of Ron r`h... en for 3K. Adopt Resolution 15-28, Authorizing Transfer of$100,000 from the Building Improvement Fund to the Cable Improvement Fund. 3L. Adopt Resolution 15-29, Temporarily Restricting Vehicle Parking for Walk for Animals. M Adopt Q A Au thnriZi ons Lien of Amendment to S �hronipieAt ,.,�,.��,-res�fu t+ep-4-5- Rm�-�g-E-�c��,��,�� Housing and PFegFamming. WateF SeFYiGe for the joint Water GOMMOSSiOR Cities. 30. Receive and file the February 2015 Financial Reports. 3P. Adopt Proclamation designating April 22, 2015, as Earth Day in Golden Valley. Unofficial City Council Minutes -3- April 7, 2015 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA 3F. Adopt second consideration, Ordinance #548, Amending Chapter 12: Subdivision Regulations, regarding Modifications from the 2014-2015 Subdivision Study. Planning Manager Zimmerman gave an overview of the ordinance and answered questions from Council. MOTION made by Council Member Fonnest, seconded by Council Member Clausen to adopt on second consideration, Ordinance #548, Amending Chapter 12: Subdivision Regulations, regarding Modifications from the 2014-2015 Subdivision Study upon a vote being taken the following voted in favor: Fonnest, Clausen and Harris and the following voted against: Snope and Schmidgall and the motion carried. 3J. Accepting a Donation from the Family of Ron Chesen for Brookview Golf Course Memorial Bench. Council recognized the family of Ron Chesen for their donation of a Memorial Bench for Brookview Golf Course. MOTION made by Council Member Clausen, seconded by Council Member Snope to adopt Resolution 15-27, Accepting a Donation from the Family of Ron Chesen for Brookview Golf Course Memorial Bench upon a vote being taken the following voted in favor of: Harris, Snope, Clausen, Schmidgall and Fonnest and the following voted against: none and the motion carried. 3M. Authorize Execution of Amendment to Subrecipient Agreement with Urban Hennepin County and Any Third Party Agreements for Jewish Housing and Programming. Mayor Harris recused himself from the vote because he is a member of the Advisory Board for the Jewish Housing and Programing and excused himself from the Council Chambers. Mayor Pro-tem Snope presided over the item. MOTION made by Council Member Clausen, seconded by Council Member Schmidgall to adopt Resolution 15-30, Authorizing Execution of Amendment to Subrecipient Agreement with Urban Hennepin County and Any Third Party Agreements for Jewish Housing and Programming upon a vote being taken the following voted in favor of: Snope, Fonnest, Clausen and Schmidgall, the following voted against: none, the following abstained: Harris and the motion carried. 3N. Support Improvements to the 36-Inch Pipe for Water Service for the Joint Water Commission Cities. City Manager Burt answered questions from the Council. MOTION made by Council Member Clausen, seconded by Council Member Snope to adopt Resolution 15-31, Supporting Making Improvements to the 36-Inch Pipe for Water Service for the Joint Water Commission Cities upon a vote being taken the following voted in favor of: Harris, Snope, Clausen, Schmidgall and Fonnest and the following voted against: none and the motion carried. Unofficial City Council Minutes -4- April 7, 2015 4. PUBLIC HEARING 4A. Public Hearing - Final PUD Plan Central Park West PUD No. 121 - 1400 and 1500 State Highway 100 South, 5075 Wayzata Boulevard, 1511 Utica Avenue South — Central Park West, LLC, Applicant Associate Planner/Grant Writer Goellner presented the staff report and answered questions from Council. City Engineer Oliver answered questions from Council. Mr. David Graham, ESG Architects, reviewed the overall design vision of the project which included details of the Central Park, the streetscape plan for Utica Boulevard, and ways they plan to reduce traffic. He said the developers plan to create a sustainable, higher density, green series of streets and pedestrian walkways in which the gateway through the Central Park will be key. He answered questions from Council. Mr. Mike Kotila, Traffic Consultant with SEH, Inc., said a neighborhood meeting was held and the neighbors did have concerns regarding the traffic study. He explained the overall facts and figures that were reported in the study. He showed a map of the intersection and said the recommended action is to add turn lanes at Quentin and Wayzata Boulevard and to make it at an all-way stop. He answered questions from Council. Mayor Harris opened the public hearing. Mr. Gary Cohen, 4530 Douglas Avenue, said the traffic issues date way back and will only continue to get worse as the development progresses. He said he appreciates the traffic study done and recommended that traffic continue to be monitored over the next few years to measure the impact before and after the development. He said he would like the traffic monitoring added as a recommendation to the PUD agreement and felt the cities of Golden Valley and St. Louis Park should work together on the traffic issues. Mr. Dave Sussman, 1445 Fairlawn Way, said he is concerned that if a stop sign is added at the intersection of Fairlawn and Wayzata Boulevard it will back up traffic and make it harder to make a left hand turn. He said a stop light may make it easier to cross over the avenue. Mr. Otis Godfrey, 4536 Douglas Avenue, said he does not agree with the engineers regarding the fact that the threshold of concern for traffic in the area had not yet been met because he felt it was met a while ago. He said the development will have a direct impact on his neighborhood because 3,500 more cars will be parked 100 yards from it and he is concerned the cars will cut through his neighborhood if drivers get frustrated with the traffic. He said the study should continue with each phase in case the increase is more than what is expected. Mr. Robert Lazear, 1519 Natchez Avenue S, asked whether a 3-way stop at Quentin was in the PUD as a recommendation. He said the traffic problems will continue because of the design of 1-394 and the design cannot be changed but it needs to be recognized as the project moves forward. He said he would like to see the traffic study continue in case the traffic is worse than expected because a traffic stop light may need to be installed instead. Mr. Robert Kolasa, 117 Paisley Lane, said however the traffic problem is solved, it is important to continue to monitor the traffic flow. He asked what would happen at the other intersections in the area because the solution the City of Golden Valley comes up with will only be as good as how well the other neighboring Cities' intersections are managed. Unofficial City Council Minutes -5- April 7, 2015 4A. Public Hearing - Final PUD Plan Central Park West PUD - continued Ms. Marti Micks, 90 Louisiana Avenue, asked what the advance of the development would be for Golden Valley residents and would it increase their housing valuations considering the cost needed for extra police and fire services and would it be a connector between Golden Valley and St. Louis Park for water. She said negotiations should be done now with Metro Transit to provide bus service to the area to help reduce traffic. Ms. Daon Karpan, 1400 Natchez Avenue S, said she does not believe the traffic increase will only be 15% because she has not seen enough data showing where the numbers were coming from. She said she is concerned the cars will realize they can cut through the neighborhood and hoped those numbers would be considered also. She said beautification on Lilac Drive has stopped and that the underpass was dark and dirty. She said she would prefer to have a traffic light instead at the intersection because it is more pedestrian friendly. Mr. Brian Walvatne, 227 Paisley Lane, said he has biked along the road and that the cars do go fast. He asked what the standard road width is and if it would accommodate bike lanes. Mayor Harris closed the public hearing. There was much Council discussion regarding the Final PUD Plan for the Central Park West PUD located at 1400 and 1500 State Highway 100 South, 5075 Wayzata Boulevard, 1511 Utica Avenue South for Central Park West, LLC, Applicant. MOTION made by Council Member Schmidgall, seconded by Council Member Fonnest to adopt Ordinance #550, Approval of Final PUD Plan, Central Park West PUD No. 121, Central Park West, LLC, Applicant, upon a vote being taken the following voted in favor of: Harris, Schmidgall, Snope, Fonnest and Clausen, the following voted against: none and the motion carried. MOTION made by Mayor Harris, seconded by Council Member Fonnest to reevaluate the traffic patterns after each phase of the development with engagement with the neighborhood, to recommend the Traffic Safety Committee consider increasing patrols if it is warranted in the area during peak times, and to direct staff to have conversations with MnDOT and the developer about addressing public safety issues and for the potential greening of the underpass upon a vote being taken the following voted in favor of: Harris, Snope, Fonnest and Clausen, the following voted against: Schmidgall and the motion carried. 4B. Public Hearing - Ordinance #551 - Amending Section 11.21, Side Setbacks of Principal Structures Planning Manager Zimmerman presented the staff report and answered questions from Council. City Manager Burt and City Attorney Barnard answered questions from Council. Mayor Harris opened the public hearing. Mr. Roy Lecy, 1801 Noble Drive, said every plat approved should have fairness because a lot of work goes into platting homes. He said the City has the most restrictive codes of all of the neighboring ones and asked what the restrictions are helping because if the houses are required to be narrower, they will be built farther back in the lots. He said he builds a lot of ramblers but the people who will be penalized by this are those who need larger two story houses. He said he does not know how the rules can change and what the City would gain. Unofficial City Council Minutes -6- April 7, 2015 4B. Public Hearing - Ordinance #551 - Amending Section 11.21 - continued Mr. Peter Knaeble, 6001 Glenwood Avenue, said it needs to be remembered that staff said they supported the interpretation of these side setbacks. He said the Planning Commission made a recommendation but there was no notice sent out and the builders in the City were not aware of the changes. He recommended sending it back to Planning Commission to rewrite it and to take into account what was done in the past. Ms. Kristin Pavek, 513 Meadow Lane, said she would not like to see large homes because they are not as green, but felt there are other consequences of the rules. She said they bought their house assuming they would be able to build a garage someday. She said it seems the point of law is to keep the neighborhood the same and if people would like to rebuild their home that they will not be able to. She asked if reducing the size of the homes is worth it to keep the neighborhood the same and what effect it has if people are unable to build garages and have to park cars outside. She said she does not think the people who own 40 foot wide lots added input to the discussion. Dr. Paul Olin, 6900 Harold Avenue, said he is concerned about the interpretation change because he has empty lots next to him. He said the issue should be sent back to the Planning Commission to review. Mr. Casey Pavek, 513 Meadow Lane, said he echoes what his wife said earlier and he likes the picture of the home that was shown and hoped one day to build something similar. Mr. Steve Shapiro, 219 Meadow Lane, said people can request a variance for special circumstances and that everyone knew the interpretation staff has been using is not the one the Planning Commission recommended. He said this ordinance is not changing the rules but only enforcing them. He said the 14 permits already submitted knew the interpretation was wrong and the approval process should stop immediately. He said the laws that were passed in 2007 should be used. Ms. Diane Richard, 217 Paisley Lane, said she would like to know the status of the property next door to her which has been approved but has not been built yet. She said the topic is not about fairness but of a legal definition of the ordinances. She said there are two sides to the issue one of the residents that live in the neighborhood, and the other of the builders who are making money in neighborhood but not living there. She showed a picture of two homes in her area and asked what the design guideline for height is? She said she would like a freeze on the all plans going forward until legal counsel can address the issue. Mr. Mark Dietz, 207 Sunnyridge Lane, asked why the innocent neighbors are being affected by an error in the Zoning Code interpretation. He said the neighborhood is disgruntled because the Zoning Code was not being followed and felt following it is not discretional. Mayor Harris closed the public hearing. There was much Council discussion regarding amending Section 11.21, Side Setbacks of Principal Structures in the R1 Zoning District. MOTION made by Council Member Snope, seconded by Council Member Fonnest to adopt Ordinance #551, Clarifying Side Setbacks of Principal Structures in the R-1 Zoning Districts upon a vote being taken the following voted in favor of: Harris, Snope and Fonnest and the following voted against: Clausen and Schmidgall and the motion carried. Unofficial City Council Minutes -7- April 7, 2015 413. Public Hearing - Ordinance #551 - Amending Section 11.21 - continued MOTION made by Council Member Fonnest, seconded by Council Member Snope to refer Subdivision 11 of Section 11.21 to the Planning Commission for a more complete definition of the side setbacks and height requirements and the motion carried unanimously. 4C. Public Hearing - Ordinance #552 - Amending Section 11.21, Subdivision 12 (E) and (J) Single Family Zoning District (R-1), to Modify the Size of Accessory Structures Planning Manager Zimmerman presented the staff report and answered questions from Council. Mayor Harris opened the public hearing. No one came forward. Mayor Harris closed the public hearing. MOTION made by Council Member Schmidgall, seconded by Council Member Fonnest to adopt Ordinance #552, Amending Section 11.21, Subdivision 12 (E) and (J) Single Family Zoning District (R-1), to Modify the Size of Accessory Structures upon a vote being taken the following voted in favor of: Harris, Fonnest and Clausen, and Schmidgall the following voted against: none and the motion carried. 6. NEW BUSINESS 6A. Approval of Plat - Central Park West PUD No. 121 and Authorization to Sign PUD Permit and PUD Development Agreement - Central Park West PUD No. 117 Planning Manager Zimmerman presented the staff report and answered questions from Council. MOTION made by Council Member Schmidgall, seconded by Council Member Snope to adopt Resolution 15-32, Approval of Plat - Central Park West PUD No. 121, upon a vote being taken the following voted in favor of: Harris, Snope, Clausen, Fonnest and Schmidgall, the following voted against: none and the motion carried. MOTION made by Council Member Snope, seconded by Council Member Fonnest to authorize the Mayor and City Manager to sign the PUD Permit and Development Agreement for Central Park West PUD No. 121 and the motion carried unanimously. 6B. Announcement of Meetings Some Council Members may attend the Golden Valley Run the Valley Race/Walk on April 11, 2015, beginning at 7:45 am at the Brookview Community Center. The next Housing and Redevelopment Authority meeting will be held on April 14, 2015, at 6:30 pm. The next Council/Manager meeting will be held on April 14, 2015, after the Housing and Redevelopment Authority meeting. Some Council Members may attend a presentation "Preventing Genocide Program" on April 18, 2015, from 10 - 11:30 am at the Crystal Community Center. Unofficial City Council Minutes -8- April 7, 2015 613. Announcement of Meeting - continued A Neighborhood Watch Community Meeting will be held on April 20, 2015, at the Golden Valley Police Department Training Room. The next City Council meeting will be held on April 21, 2015, at 6:30 pm. Some Council Members may attend the Golden Valley Rotary Club event on April 18, 2015, beginning at 6 pm at Brookview Community Center. City Manager Burt reviewed the April 14, 2015, Council/Manager meeting agenda. 6C. Mayor and Council Communication Mayor Harris updated Council on the concern from the Sweeney Lake Association the water levels in the lake. Mayor Harris asked Council if they would like to schedule a team building event. Council agreed to schedule a meeting for April 14, 2015, at 5:30 pm. Mayor Harris updated Council on an incident that a concerned resident reported regarding the waste hauling issue. 7. Adjournment MOTION made by Council Member Snope, seconded by Council Member Schmidgall, and the motion carried unanimously to adjourn the meeting at 10:44 pm. Shepard Harris, Mayor ATTEST: Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk .�. A _. Administrative Services Department 763-593-8013 /763-593-3969(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting April 21, 2015 Agenda Item 3. B. 1. Approval of City Check Register Prepared By Sue Virnig, Finance Director Summary Approval of the check register for various vendor claims against the City of Golden Valley. Attachments • Document sent via email Recommended Action Motion to authorize the payment of the bills as submitted. city q � ; ' MEMO O alley Administrative Services Department 763-593-8013/763-593-3969 (fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting April 21, 2015 Agenda Item 3. B. 2. Approval of Housing and Redevelopment Authority Check Register Prepared By Sue Virnig, Finance Director Summary Approval of the check register for various vendor claims against the Housing and Redevelopment Authority. Attachments • Document sent via email Recommended Action Motion to authorize the payment of the bills as submitted. citv of E golde" n M M 0 R A N D U AR, valley City Administration/Council 763-593-3991 /763-593-8109(fax) IIH 00 UM nl lr,A Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting April 21, 2015 Agenda Item 3. C. 1. Gambling License Exemption and Waiver of Notice Requirement - School of Engineering and Arts - Parent Teacher Association Prepared By Judy Nally, Administrative Assistant Summary As per State Statute organizations that conduct gambling within the City limits have to submit an application for a lawful gambling permit to the State after the permit has been approved or denied by the City. Depending upon the timing of the permit the applicants may request the City to waive the 30-day waiting period. Attachments 0 Application for Exempt Permit (4 pages) Recommended Action Motion to receive and file the gambling license exemption and approve the waiver of notice requirement for the School of Engineering and Arts - Parent Teacher Association. MINNESOTA LAWFUL GAMBLING 8/14 _ LG220 Application for Exempt Permit Page 1 oft An exempt permit may be issued to a nonprofit organization that: Application fee (nonrefundable) conducts lawful gambling on five or fewer days, and If the application is postmarked or received awards less than $50,000 in prizes during a calendar year. 30 days or more before the event, the application If total prize value for the year will be$1,500 or less, contact the Licensing fee is$50; otherwise the fee is $100. Specialist assigned to your county. Organization Information Organization Name: Previous Gambling Permit Number: Minnesota Tax ID Number, if!1y: Federal Employer ID Number(FEIN), if any: r Lo' Type of Nonprofit Organization (check one): Fraternal a Religious Veterans ®Other Nonprofit Organization Mailing Address' City: State and Zip: County: Name of Chief Executive(Officer(CEO): Daytime Phone: EmaC, C111 __>I'l—I C-1 -il: o Nonprofit Status ; Attach a copy of ONE of the following for proof of nonprofit status: Nonprofit Articles of Incorporation OR a current Certificate of Good Standing. Don't have a copy? This certificate must be obtained each year from: Minnesota Secretary of State Business Services Division 60 Empire Drive, Suite 100 St. Paul, MN 55103 Phone: 651-296-2803 IRS income tax exemption (501(c)) letter in your organization's name. Don't have a copy? To obtain a copy of your federal income tax exempt letter, have an organization officer contact the IRS at 877-829-5500. IRS -Affiliate of national, statewide, or international parent nonprofit organization (charter). If your organization falls under a parent organization, attach copies of both of the following: a. an IRS letter showing your parent organization is a nonprofit 501(c) organization with a group ruling, and b. the charter or letter from your parent organization recognizing your organization as a subordinate. Gambling Premises Information Name of premises where the gambling event will be conducted (for raffles, list the site where the drawing will take place): CZTA Address (do not u1s}e PO bd F City or Township: t Zip Code: County: [" C� i �.L t ` ' M1l `y' i V .1 y 6 C �') 6 1 f�'!b'C/ E n Date(s) of activity (f r raffles, indicate the date of the drawing): A. 1 «1' C� Check each type of gambling activity that your organization will conduct: Bingo* Paddlewheels* aPull-Tabs* Tipboards* Raffle (total value of raffle prizes awarded for the year: $ *Gambling equipment for bingo paper, paddlewheels, pull-tabs, and tipboards�used p6e� �t� fro Um-a'distributor licensed by the Minnesota Gambling Control Board. EXCEPTION: Bingo hard cards and bingo number selection devices may be borrowed from another organization authorized to conduct bingo. To find a licensed distributor, go to www.mn.gov/gcb and click on Distributors under the LIST OF LICENSEES, or call 651-539-1900. LG220 Application for Exempt Permit 8/14 Page 2 of 2 Local Unit of Government Acknowledgment CITY APPROVAL COUNTY APPROVAL for a gambling premises for a gambling premises located within city limits located in a township (The application is acknowledged with no waiting period. heapplication is acknowledged with no waiting period. application is acknowledged with a 30-day waiting he application is acknowledged with a 30-day waiting period, and allows the Board to issue a permit after 30 days period, and allows the Board to issue a permit after (60 days for a 1st class city). 30 days. The applicationis denied. /l he application is denied. Print City Name: of lCQ j�/"1 Valle ; Print County Name: Signa re ofi Pe n el: Signature of County Personnel: Title: Date: Title: Date: TOWNSHIP (if required by the county). On behalf of the township,I acknowledge that the organization is applying for exempted gambling activity within the township limits. (A township has no statutory authority to approve or Local unit of government must sign. deny an application, per Minn. Statutes, section 349.166.) Print Township Name: Signature of Township Officer: Title: Date: Chief Executive Officer's Signature The information provided in this application is complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge. I acknowledge that the financial report will be completed and returned to the Board within 30.days of the event date. Chief Executive Officer's Signature: _�_, �C�.5 � � r) 1 �` J /f L c D G' : I_1 Date: Print Name: ::A '6V� Requirements Complete a separate application for: Financial report and recordkeeping required. • all gambling conducted on two or more consecutive days, or A financial report form and instructions will be sent with your • all gambling conducted on one day. permit, or use the online fill-in form available at Only one application is required if one or more raffle drawings are www.mn.gov/gcb. conducted on the same day. Within 30 days of the event date, complete and return the Se d application with: financial report form to the Gambling Control Board. Your a copy of your proof of nonprofit status,and organization must keep all exempt raffle records and reports for application fee (nonrefundable). If the application is3-1/2 years(Minn. Statutes, section 349.166, subd. 2(f)). postmarked or received 30 days or more before the event, the application fee is$50; otherwise the fee is $100. Make Questions? check payable to State of Minnesota. Call the Licensing Section of the Gambling Control Board at 651-539-1900. To: Gambling Control Board This form will be made available in alternative format(i.e. large 1711 West County Road B, Suite 300 South print, Braille) upon request. Roseville, MN 55113 Data privacy notice: The information requested application. Your organization's name and ment of Public Safety;Attorney General; on this form(and any attachments)will be used address will be public information when received Commissioners of Administration, Minnesota by the Gambling Control Board (Board)to by the Board. All other information provided will Management&Budget,and Revenue; Legislative determine your organization's qualifications to be private data about your organization until the Auditor,national and international gambling be involved in lawful gambling activities in Board issues the permit, When the Board issues regulatory agencies; anyone pursuant to court Minnesota. Your organization has the right to the permit,all information provided will become order;other individuals and agencies specifically refuse to supply the information; however, if public. If the Board does not issue a permit,all authorized by state or federal law to have access your organization refuses to supply this information provided remains private,with the to the information; individuals and agencies for information,the Board may not be able to exception of your organization's name and which law or legal order authorizes a new use or determine your organization's qualifications and, address which will remain public. Private data sharing of information after this notice was as a consequence, may refuse to issue a permit. about your organization are available to Board given;and anyone with your written consent. If your organization supplies the information members,Board staff whose work requires requested,the Board will be able to process the access to the information; Minnesota's Depart- citv 00 , `6` olden MEMORANDUM .., valley Police Department 763-593-8079/763-593-8098(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting April 21, 2015 Agenda Item 3. C. 2. Gambling Premises License Application - Minnesota/USA Wrestling, Inc. Prepared By Chief Stacy Carlson Sergeant Jim Roberts Summary Minnesota/USA Wrestling, Inc. submitted an application for a Minnesota Lawful Gambling License. Minnesota/USA Wrestling, Inc. would operate the pull-tab booth at JJ's Clubhouse located at 6400 Wayzata Boulevard. Documents received from the applicant show that the Minnesota Gambling Control Board currently licenses the organization and its gambling manager, Daniel Chandler. An investigation was conducted by the Police Department reference this application. This investigation included checks with the Gambling Enforcement Division of the Minnesota Department of Public Safety, and the Minnesota Gambling Control Board. At this time, no negative information was uncovered by the investigation. The applicant has met statutory and City Code requirements for a lawful gambling license. Attachments • Resolution Approving Issuance of a Premises Permit for the Conduct of Lawful Gambling- Minnesota/USA Wrestling, Inc. (1 page) Recommended Action Motion to adopt Resolution Approving Issuance of a Premises Permit for the Conduct of Lawful Gambling- Minnesota/USA Wrestling, Inc. Resolution 15-33 April 21, 2015 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY APPROVING ISSUANCE OF A PREMISES PERMIT FOR THE CONDUCT OF LAWFUL GAMBLING (MINNESOTA/USA WRESTLING, INC.) WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 349 provide for the licensing of lawful gambling by the State Gambling Control Board ("Board"); and WHEREAS, a licensed organization may not conduct lawful gambling at any site unless it has first obtained from the Board a premises permit for the site; and WHEREAS, the Board may not issue or renew a premises permit unless the organization submits a resolution from the City Council approving the premises permit; said resolution shall have been adopted within 60 days of the date of the application was received by the City; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City of Golden Valley that the applicant listed below does meet the criteria necessary to receive a premises permit and the application is hereby approved: (Name and Address of Organization) Minnesota/USA Wrestling, Inc., 1422 Emerson Avenue North, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55411 (Name and Address of Site where Premises Permit Sought) JJ's Clubhouse, 6400 Wayzata Boulevard, Golden Valley, Minnesota 55426 Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by the City Clerk. city of ' s valley City Administration/Council 763-593-3991 /763-593-8109(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting May 5, 2015 Agenda Item 3. C. 3. Solicitor's License - Fund for the Public Interest Prepared By Judy Nally, Administrative Assistant Summary As per City Code, any individual or group intending to go door-to-door within the City selling products, taking orders or soliciting for business or donations must be licensed by the City to do SO. Attachments • Peddler/Solicitor License Application (2 pages) Recommended Action Motion to approve the solicitor's license for Fund for the Public Interest. Application and fee must be submitted to the City Manager's Office the Wednesday prior to the City Council Meeting. Council Meetings are normally held the first and third Tuesday of each month. PEDDLERISOLICITOR LICENSE APPLICATION TO: Golden Valley City Council Fee Paid: $ 51�1- `v 7800 Golden Valley Road Number of Persons: Golden Valley, MN 55427 Type of License: Peddler Solicit (circle 0- Enclose the sum of for (number) peddlers/solicitors as required by City Code of the City of Golden Valley and have complied with all the requirements of said Code necessary for obtaining this license. (Business or Individual Name or Organization to be Licensed) MN Business ID Federal Business ID (FEIN) Define Business (Corporation, Proprietorship, Partnership, Non-Profit, State of Incorporation or Individual) Q0( (Address) V\,1N City, State and Zip Code) C_Q k2) 3-3t - ?-,ioi (Telephone Number, including Area Code) NOW, THEREFORE, hereby makes application for (Applicant Name) period of LL6LA through 12/31/�",_subject to the conditions and provisions of said City Code. (Signatura0f Applicant/Principal Officer) Description of goods or services for sale (include prices) or indicate if soliciting donations. If more space is needed, attach additional sheets (be specific): NOTE: If the products for sale are changed or modified, you must give the City complete information regarding such change or modification. List the names and addresses of EACH person who will be peddling or soliciting on behalf of said organization in the City, or, in the alternative, the name, address and telephone number or numbers where a responsible person of said organization will maintain a list of names and addresses of all persons engaged in peddling or soliciting in the City: (If more space is needed, attach additional sheets) STATE OF t4?NNjL5&W ) ) ss. COUNTY OF WtP1 ,P1w) I, of �-- (Officer/I' vidual) (Name of Organization) being first duly sworn, depose and say that all the foregoing information is true to his/her own knowledge except as to matters therein stated on information and belief, and as to such matters, he/she believes them to be true. Signature of plicant/Principal Officer) Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of , 20 JUDITH A. NALLY NOTARY pUBUC.MINNESOTA G /J � My Commission Expires January 31,2020 (Signature) Regular Meeting of the Golden Valley Planning Commission March 23, 2015 A regular meeting of the Planning Commission was held at the Golden Valley City Hall, Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota, on Monday, March 23, 2015. Chair Kluchka called the meeting to order at 7 pm. Those present were Planning Commissioners Blum, Cera, Kluchka, Segelbaum, and Waldhauser. Also present was Planning Manager Jason Zimmerman, Associate Planner/Grant Writer Emily Goellner, and Administrative Assistant Lisa Wittman. Commissioners Baker and Johnson were absent. 1. Approval of Minutes February 9, 2015, Joint City Council and Planning Commission Meeting March 9, 2015, Regular Planning Commission Meeting MOVED by Waldhauser, seconded by Cera and motion carried unanimously to approve the February 9, 2015, and the March 9, 2015, minutes as submitted. 2. Informal Public Hearing — Preliminary PUD Plan — CenterPoint Energy — 6161 Golden Valley Road — PU-122 Applicant: CenterPoint Energy Address: 6161 Golden Valley Road Purpose: To allow a new approximately 64,000 square foot operations facility, replacement of an approximately 825 square foot gas regulator building, and related site improvements. Goellner referred to a site plan and explained the applicant's request for a PUD to add an additional principal structure. The proposed new structure is a 64,000 square foot operations facility which includes office, warehouse, and small metal shop. The applicant is also proposing to replace a gas regulator building. Goellner stated that Douglas Drive is being reconstructed in 2016-2017 and noted that the placement of the building and setbacks are shown on applicant's plans using the proposed new property lines. She referred to the parking on the site and stated that the City Code requires approximately 80 parking spaces and that the applicant is providing 208 spaces. She stated that the applicant is encouraged to add a sidewalk connecting their office to the proposed sidewalk along Douglas Drive. She referred to the site plan and discussed stormwater management and landscaping. She explained that the current pond on the site will be filled in, and a new pond will be constructed. The applicant is also proposing to remove 65 trees and to plant 132 new trees and has been directed to include shrub and perennial plantings as well. She stated that staff is recommending approval of the Preliminary PUD plan subject to the conditions listed in the staff report. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission March 23, 2015 Page 2 Segelbaum asked if there are any additional requirements that the applicant is required to meet due to the reconstruction of Douglas Drive. Goellner said no and added that the sidewalk along Douglas Drive will be provided with the reconstruction project. Kluchka asked Goellner to highlight where the sidewalk on Douglas Drive will be located and comment on if it is guaranteed to be built. Goellner referred to the site plan and showed where the proposed sidewalks will be located along Douglas Drive. Kluchka asked if that sidewalk will connect to the sidewalk on Golden Valley Road. Goellner said she believes it will. Waldhauser referred to the proposed number of parking spaces and asked why the additional parking is needed. Goellner said she thinks the number of spaces proposed fits with the number of employees on site. Segelbaum noted that the plans shown in the presentation show the driveways on Douglas Drive in alignment, but they were not aligned on the plans in the agenda packet. Waldhauser clarified that the driveway alignment issue is on Golden Valley Road, not Douglas Drive. Zimmerman added that Tennant currently has two driveways that will be consolidated and re-aligned with the reconstruction of the Douglas Drive/Golden Valley Road intersection. Blum asked if the applicant is regulating the inflow and outflow of gas at this facility. Goellner said yes. Blum asked if the proposed new facility will also be for that purpose or just for office purposes. Blum also asked if there are any environmental or safety considerations for increased capacity in the outflow of gas, or if that has a relationship to where the new facility is located on the property. Goellner said the applicant could help answer those questions. Segelbaum asked if the City has any record of there being any safety incidents at this location. Zimmerman said the Fire Department has had discussions about the appropriate fire suppression system and standards for the tank farm. Ross Hedlund, Frauenshuh Commercial, Representing the Applicant, said they are very excited about this project on an underutilized piece of property on Golden Valley. He said they have representatives in attendance from OPUS, Loucks, and CenterPoint to answer questions. Dave Long, Facilities Project Manager for Gas Operations, CenterPoint Energy, addressed the questions about the parking. He said they will have approximately 70 employees coming from other facilities who all have fleet vehicles. They will arrive in their personal vehicles and then take the fleet vehicles out for the day and come back. He said there will also be a number of other employees at this site. Waldhauser asked if the fleet vehicles are rotating in and out, or if they all arrive and leave at once. Long stated that they will leave the site between 6-8 am and will arrive back between 2:30-4 pm. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission March 23, 2015 Page 3 Vicki VanDell, Loucks Associates, Representing the Applicant, referred to the questions regarding the sidewalks and stated that they could put in a sidewalk connection from the proposed new building to Douglas Drive and another connection to Golden Valley Road. Kluchka asked about the traffic patterns on the site. VanDell referred to a site plan and explained that the Golden Valley Road entrance is mostly used by office staff. The Douglas Drive entrance is mostly used by operations, warehouse, and research staff. Long added that the Douglas Drive entrance will be used by construction and maintenance trucks and trucks delivering to the warehouse. Dan Young Dixon, OPUS Architects and Engineers, referred to a site plan and noted that the large open area in the center of the site is storage for piping used for installations. Kluchka asked if that open area will be paved. VanDell said it will be paved. Kluchka asked if that area would be screened. Dixon stated that the building will screen the open area, and that there is already a berm and fencing around the site and the tanks. Segelbaum said he would like to hear more about the overall screening for the whole site. He said this is fairly prominent area and screening is very important. VanDell referred to the landscaping plan and showed which trees will be removed for the construction of the new building and expanded parking area. She pointed out the evergreens, berms and deciduous trees on the site that will help provide screening. Waldhauser recommended that the applicant provide building elevations and renderings that describe what people will see on the north and west sides of the property when walking or driving. Dixon referred to the design of the proposed new building and explained that the north side of the building is offices and will have a significant amount of glazing that will wrap around to the west side. The building will then be separated with pre-cast that will have recesses and reveals to break up the massing and will be painted to match with both light and dark colors. Kluchka stated that CenterPoint does a lot of education and suggested they install some kind of signage that describes their energy efficient message since this is a gateway area. Dixon agreed and stated that they are looking at LEED certification for the building as well. Blum asked about the volumes of gas being transferred through the facility currently, and what the volumes will be. Long stated that the peak shaving plant doesn't run all that much, it just runs when it is really cold outside. He added that the usage of the peak shaving plant is weather dependent and won't get used more as a result of this proposal. Kluchka asked what peak shaving means. Long explained that as the weather gets colder, the peak demand goes up, so they shave the peak off by injecting the system with compressed air to maintain the volume and pressure in the system. Blum asked if there will be a change in volume as a result of proposed expansion. Long said to his knowledge it will operate exactly like it has been. Blum asked if there are any new safety considerations as a result of what they are proposing to do on the property. Long said there could be as they continue to work with the Fire Chief. Kluchka asked about the plans for installing bike racks. Dixon said bike racks aren't shown on the plans yet, but they will be included. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission March 23, 2015 Page 4 Kluchka reiterated that this property is going to become a significant gateway site. He said he is thinking about how this corner becomes a gateway to bikers. He said he would love to see any opportunities with this development and the street reconstruction to say welcome to Golden Valley. Dixon said he understands the gateway opportunity. He stated that the new pond and landscaping will be at the corner in order to highlight the intersection. Segelbaum noted that the south side of the property has bike traffic and he doesn't want the storage tanks to be the first thing people see. VanDell discussed the trees along the south side of the property. Kluchka said he is also interested in how the west elevation can be humanized and how drivers, bikers and pedestrians will be affected. He said he wants to understand how the building isn't going to seem too big when someone is walking past. Cera referred to the stormwater management plan and asked if the applicant is proposing both a storage basin and rain gardens. VanDell said they have a high water table so infiltration is difficult, which is why they decided to do stormwater ponding on this site. However, there could be opportunities for surface infiltration along the west side of the property. Kluchka suggested that if the inside of the building has a visual interest that could also be highlighted. Segelbaum reiterated that the applicant should have elevation plans and renderings ready to the show to the City Council. Kluchka opened the public hearing. Meena Shariff-Dean, 1350 Douglas Drive #106, asked is the existing pond will be removed. Kluchka said they will be removing and replacing the pond. Seeing and hearing no one else wishing to comment, Kluchka closed the public hearing. Zimmerman confirmed that the existing pond will be removed and two new ponds will be added on the north side of the site. Segelbaum asked about the requirements regarding ponds. Zimmerman said there are requirements for landscaping and the details will be reviewed as part of the stormwater review process. Cera asked if the original pond was built or if it is natural. Zimmerman said it was built. Kluchka asked staff to comment on the sidewalk and bike plan in this area. Zimmerman stated that there is a good layout for the vehicle lanes and bike lanes as part of the Douglas Drive reconstruction plans. He stated that he would ask staff from the Engineering division to come to a future Planning Commission meeting and present an updated plan of the Douglas Drive project. Kluchka asked if there are any plans for a wayside area or way finding signs for pedestrians and bikers. Zimmerman stated that there may be areas for bikers and pedestrians included in the final plans for the Douglas Drive reconstruction project but the plans are not yet complete. Kluchka asked about bus access. Zimmerman said he doesn't expect the bus access to change. Segelbaum said he is pleased to see that CenterPoint wants to invest in this site because it is a property in Golden Valley that is only going to become more prominent. He said he is also pleased to see increased landscaping and screening and he is hoping to see more Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission March 23, 2015 Page 5 concrete information about screening in future elevations and renderings. Cera agreed that this will be a vast improvement over what is there now. The Commissioners agreed. Kluchka suggested adding a condition of approval regarding design review and approval. Segelbaum said the design is usually shown in the different plan views. Kluchka said he wants the Planning Commission to review and approve the design in this case especially because of its proximity to pedestrians, bikers, and drivers. Cera said he would like to know how this proposal compares to the impervious surface requirements in the Industrial zoning district. Zimmerman stated that the Industrial zoning district doesn't have impervious surface requirements. Cera said it would be nice to know how much impervious surface there will be on the site. Goellner stated that 66.1% of the site will be impervious surface. Kluchka suggested adding a condition of approval regarding landscaping and screening. Segelbaum agreed and said he wants emphasis placed on screening. Kluchka summarized that the conditions should include: 1) screening as it relates to pedestrians, bikes, and cars; and 2) design review and approval. Segelbaum added that he would like to require that elevations, renderings, and views from the street be submitted. Zimmerman said a condition regarding bike racks should also be added. MOVED by Waldhauser, seconded by Cera and motion carried unanimously to recommend approval of the Preliminary PUD Plan for CenterPoint Energy PUD No. 122, subject to the following findings and conditions: Findings: 1. The PUD plan is tailored to the specific characteristics of the site and achieves a higher quality of site planning and design than generally expected under conventional provisions of the ordinance. This PUD will allow the applicant to better utilize the site by developing the operations facility on the site. 2. The PUD plan preserves and protects substantial desirable portions of the site's characteristics, open space and sensitive environmental features including steep slopes, trees, scenic views, creeks, wetlands, and open waters. The plan will utilize the perimeter of the site for tree plantings and stormwater management. 3. The PUD plan includes efficient and effective use (which includes preservation) of the land. The plan brings more active uses to this large site by providing office and warehouse uses, which are compatible with the current uses on the property. 4. The PUD Plan results in development compatible with adjacent uses and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and redevelopment plans and goals. The proposed uses are permitted in the Industrial zoning district. 5. The PUD plan is consistent with preserving and improving the general health, safety and general welfare of the people of the City. 6. The PUD plan meets the PUD Intent and Purpose provision and all other PUD ordinance provisions. With exception of the issues raised by the Fire Chief, the plan generally meets the requirements. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission March 23, 2015 Page 6 Conditions: 1. The plans prepared by Loucks Associates, submitted on March 20, 2015, shall become a part of this approval. 2. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the City Engineer to the Planning Manager, dated March 13, 2015, shall become a part of this approval. 3. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Fire Chief to the Planning Manager, dated March 20, 2015, shall become a part of this approval. 4. All signage must meet the requirements of the City's Sign Code (Section 4.20). 5. A park dedication fee of$72,540 (2% of the land market value) shall be paid prior to approval of the Final Plat. 6. The Final Plat shall include "P.U.D. No. 122" in its title. 7. The applicant shall address screening and landscaping to describe views by pedestrians, bikers and car passengers including renderings. 8. The application will be subject to design review and approval that would include elevations, materials, and general renderings. 9. Bicycle racks shall be provided. 10. This approval is subject to all other state, federal, and local ordinances, regulations, or laws with authority over this development. 3. Informal Public Hearing —Zoning Code Text Amendment— Hotel Parking Requirements — ZO00-97 Applicant: City of Golden Valley Purpose: To consider amending language in the Zoning Code regarding hotel parking requirements. Goellner reminded the Commission that at their last meeting they discussed amending the Zoning Code language regarding hotel parking. She explained that the current number of required parking spaces for a hotel use is 1.5 spaces per unit plus parking for other uses. She reviewed several other cities requirements and said staff is recommending the parking requirement be changed to 1 parking space per unit plus parking for other uses. Segelbaum asked if other cities address what they feel is appropriate parking for banquet space. Goellner said not many cities she researched addressed banquet parking. Zimmerman added that Golden Valley's Code requires 1 space per 3 seats for convention and exhibition halls. Segelbaum suggested hotel banquet space be added to the convention and exhibition hall language because he is concerned that someone might take advantage if there are no requirements regarding banquet spaces. Waldhauser suggested that the language be changed to say event spaces. Kluchka opened the public hearing. Seeing and hearing no one wishing to comment, Kluchka closed the public hearing. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission March 23, 2015 Page 7 Blum said the language staff is recommending seems reasonable and consistent with what other communities are doing and it will give the Super 8 Hotel an opportunity to expand. Cera suggested reviewing a couple different areas of the parking language regarding events, banquets, and restaurants. Zimmerman said staff will review the language pertaining to those uses. Kluchka said he feels comfortable with the proposed change for hotel parking. Waldhauser said the expectation is if there is another use, staff would just figure out which parking requirements are compatible, so she doesn't have an issue with leaving the "other uses" language in the hotel parking requirements. Segelbaum said it is fine to use staff discretion but banquets and events are uses that can be anticipated so he'd like the language to be more clear in this case. Zimmerman stated that the Planning Commission could just consider the proposed change to the hotel parking and staff could bring back additional information regarding other uses, or staff could review other uses and discuss them when this item goes to the City Council for consideration. Segelbaum said he is comfortable with the item going to the City Council, but if there are widely different numbers in staff's review it may be worth bringing the item back to Planning Commission. MOVED by Cera, seconded by Kluchka and motion carried unanimously to recommend amending the Zoning Code regarding hotel parking requirements to 1 space per unit plus parking for other uses. 4. Informal Public Hearing — Zoning Code Text Amendment— Single Family Residential Height and Side Setbacks —ZO00-98 Applicant: City of Golden Valley Purpose: To consider amending language in the Zoning Code regarding building height, side setbacks, and side wall articulation requirements. Zimmerman explained that in 2006 the City studied infill development including height, massing, setbacks, etc. He reminded the Commissioners that they discussed the interpretation of the Zoning Code changes made as a result of the 2006 study at their last meeting and staff now has a clearer understanding of what was intended. He stated that the Planning Commission consensus was that height was to be measured at one spot at the street frontage, both side setbacks would increase the same amount according to that one front measurement, and that this was intended for new construction. He stated that what has been happening since 2006 was a tiered (wedding cake) setback for both new construction and remodels. He explained that one option is to grandfather in existing homes and move forward with the interpretation as intended, or another option is to change the Zoning Code language to match how staff has been interpreting the Code Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission March 23, 2015 Page 8 since the infill development study changes were adopted. He showed the Commission several illustrations showing houses that interpreted the Zoning Code both ways. He added that the text amendment staff is bringing forward at this meeting is language that will grandfather in homes that were built prior to April 15, 2015. Cera asked if there needs to be language added to the Zoning Code to clarify the original intent. Zimmerman said the language doesn't need to be amended if the way it was meant to be interpreted is followed and applied uniformly. Segelbaum questioned if the proposed grandfathering language will apply to all side setbacks in the City. Zimmerman stated that the proposed language will apply to anything that was built with a building permit prior to the Zoning Code changes. Segelbaum questioned what would happen if something was built within a setback area and asked if they would be considered legally non-conforming. Zimmerman stated that legally built structures would be allowed to remain and are considered to be conforming. He said he would get further clarification from the City Attorney. Blum said he would feel more comfortable if the proposed language pointed to the specific ordinance that they are trying to clarify and not include everything built in history. Zimmerman suggested rather than replacing the existing Subdivision 14 maybe the new language should state the dates of January 1, 2008, to April 15, 2015, in order to be more specific. Waldhauser noted that the same language regarding grandfathering was added to the Code in 2008 and questioned what harm there is in saying that everything legally built prior to a certain date is grandfathered in. Segelbaum said there is ambiguity regarding what the Zoning Code was at the time building permits were issued. He added that he is not sure that it is appropriate to change the language regarding structures that were built prior to 2008. Kluchka suggested adding language about variances in the proposed new ordinance. Cera said he doesn't want variances to become Zoning Code language. He wants variances to stay variances. Segelbaum said he's not sure the City knows what was compliant or not at the time building permits were issued, so he would like a separate section of Code addressing this time period. Kluchka opened the public hearing. Steve Schmidgall, 6534 Olympia Street, said he was on the Planning Commission when they came up with the language regarding the increased side yard setbacks. He referred to an illustration showing the potential volume of a structure and said he thought that is what the Commission at the time was proposing. He said mostly what drove the efforts of the past study was unsightly tear downs and re-builds. He added that his intent was to define a buildable volume and that anything could be built as long as it was within the volume area. Steve Shapiro, 219 Meadow Lane North, encouraged there not to be a huge period of uncertainty. He said he knows when the City decided to study subdivisions there was question about what was going to be included and what was not and there ended up being six applications submitted in a midnight charge. He said from what he is understanding there are certain rules, which may or may not have been observed for many years, and now the City wants to really clamp down and make those rules rigid. He Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission March 23, 2015 Page 9 said he wants to make sure there isn't a period where people can run in with their permit applications and they get in under the wink and nod rule. Todd Ereth, 240 Meadow Lane North, said he is encouraged to hear where this is going and is encouraged that the Planning Commission wants to take time to understand the gap period. He said there have been a lot of builds in his neighborhood, some have had the wedding cake shape and some have not. He said there has been some concerns about what the City was trying to do and what the City was approving because some have felt they are conforming and some have not. He said he appreciates the City trying to figure out what truly was conforming during that timeframe. Seeing and hearing no one else wishing to comment, Kluchka closed the public hearing. Kluchka asked Zimmerman about the timing of this amendment. Zimmerman stated that this item and the Subdivision Study recommendations are scheduled to be on the April 7 City Council agenda. If it is ready to go forward the language would be effective upon publication of the ordinance. He added that if more time is needed the conversation could be continued to the April 21 City Council agenda. Cera stated that he came across his copy of the Planning Commission minority report that became the majority report written in 2008 and it was clear how to interpret the Zoning Code language proposed at that time. He said he has a problem with the City continuing to misinterpret the Zoning Code language until April 15. He said people applying for building permits now should be told they have to follow the Zoning Code language as it was intended. Kluchka asked if policies have changed yet. Zimmerman said no, because people have submitted plans based on information given to them from the City. He said the idea was to allow those plans time to get through the building permit process. Kluchka asked if a communications campaign has been started to let people know about the April 15 deadline. Waldhauser said there is no way of knowing who is about to submit plans. Segelbaum questioned if the Planning Commission truly determined the intent of the Zoning Code language. The Commissioners agreed that they have determined that the language has been interpreted incorrectly. Blum said he agreed with Commissioner Cera that the City should not continue to misinterpret the Zoning Code now that the intent is known. Zimmerman stated that the issue has not yet been considered by the City Council, so there is still a question of if they want to change the interpretation. Segelbaum suggested that the Commission discuss amending the proposed language. The Commissioners discussed at length the specific language in Subdivision 11(A)(3), Subdivision 14 and proposed a new Subdivision 15. The consensus of the Planning Commission was to amend Subdivision 11(A)(3) removing the words "any part of," as follows: Side Setback. Side yard setbacks are determined by the lot width at the minimum required front setback line. The distance between any paFt of a structure and the side lot lines shall be governed by the following requirements: Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission March 23, 2015 Page 10 The consensus of the Planning Commission was to keep Subdivision 14 as is. (Subdivision 14. Height and Side Setbacks of Pre-2008 Structures. For all existing structures constructed in the R-1 Zoning District prior to January 1, 2008, if the side setbacks and height were compliant with the Zoning Code at the time a building permit was issued, the location and height are considered conforming to current Zoning Code. However, new construction and additions to such properties must comply with current requirements of the Zoning Code.) The consensus of the Planning Commission is to amend staff's proposed language for Subdivision 14 by adding a new Subdivision 15 to read as follows: Subdivision 44 15. Side Setbacks of January 1, 2008 to Pfe-April 15, 2015 Structures, Building Permits and Applications. For all structures constructed and building permits issued or applied therefor in the R-1 Zoning District on or after January 1, 2008, and prior to April 15, 2015, if the -height and side setbacks were considered by the City to be compliant with Section 11.21, Subdivision 11(A)(3) of the Zoning Code at the time a building permit was issued or applied therefor, the height and loGation are side setback is considered conforming. to GUrFent Zoning Code. However, in all cases, new construction and additions to such properties must comply with current requirements of the Zoning Code. MOVED by Kluchka, seconded by Waldhauser and motion carried unanimously to recommend approval of the following: • Modify the proposed Subdivision 14, making it Subdivision 15, to include the dates and various edits reviewed earlier. • Edit the Zoning Code, Section 11.21, Subdivision 11(A)(3) second sentence phrasing to read...the distance between a structure and the side lot line shall be governed by the following requirements: --Short Recess-- 5. Reports on Meetings of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority, City Council, Board of Zoning Appeals and other Meetings Zimmerman gave an update on the Liberty Crossing proposal at Winnetka and Medicine Lake Road. Kluchka asked about the status of the Golden Villas proposal and the J-HAP proposal. Zimmerman said both of these projects are still moving forward. He stated that the City Council liked the idea of a pedestrian overlay district for the Golden Valley Road/TH 55 area. He said they also want to consider rezoning the vacant parcels on Golden Valley Road to allow senior housing. 6. Other Business • Council Liaison Report Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission March 23, 2015 Page 11 No report was given. Kluchka referred to the motion the Commission made at their last meeting recommending that the City Council consider traffic issues on Wayzata Blvd. He stated that he has since learned that if there is something the Commission wants the Council to consider, the process is for the Chair to send a letter to Council, not to make a motion at the Commission meeting. 7. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 9:17 pm. Charles D. Segelbaum, Secretary Lisa Wittman, Administrative Assistant MINUTES Human Rights Commission (HRC) City of Golden Valley 7800 Golden Valley Road Golden Valley, MN 55427 Council Conference Room February 24, 2015 Commissioners present: Teresa Martin, Chair Carla Johnson, Vice Chair Jonathan Burris Simon Gotlieb Payton Perkins Michael Pristash Sue Phelps Andrew Ramlet Commissioners absent: Adam Buttress Staff: Chantell Knauss, Assistant City Manager The meeting was convened at 6:33 pm by Chair Martin. Approval of January 27, 2015 Meeting Minutes Motion by Commissioner Burris, second by Commissioner Gotlieb to approve the January 27, 2015 minutes. Motion carried 8-0. Council Updates Knauss informed the HRC that the Council is in the process of reviewing the Boards/Commission Guidelines and there may be an upcoming change to allow for Chairs and Vice Chairs to serve up to two years. If any change is made, the HRC will need to amend their Bylaws in order to reflect any Council changes. Old Business Preventing Genocide Program Update Chair Martin reported that the co-sponsored program, Preventing Genocide, with the RRCs of Crystal, New Hope and Robbinsdale will be held on Saturday, April 18 from 10-11:30 am at the Crystal Community Center (Meeting Rooms A and B), 4800 Douglas Drive North. The speaker is Executive Director Dr. Ellen J. Kennedy of World Without Genocide. The event will be free to the public. The planning committee's next meeting will be held at Mountain Mudd in Crystal on March 22 at 9 am. At their last meeting, the committee discussed possible options for security at the event. The committee would also like the involved cities to proclaim April as Genocide Awareness Month. Human Rights Commission February 24,2015 Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 3 Motion by Commissioner Burris, second by Commissioner Phelps to recommend the City Council proclaim April as Genocide Awareness Month. Motion carried 8-0. This item will be on the April 7, 2015 City Council Agenda for consideration. HRC members should plan on being in attendance to accept the proclamation. May 2015 HRC Conversations Planning — Blank Slate Theatre Production of "bottom" Commissioners discussed how to best alert student groups and access high school email newsletters. This item will be placed on the March agenda for further discussion. October 2015 HRC Conversations Planning Some possible resources/panelists: • Star Tribune article, "State is Out Front Against Sex Trafficking," published February 21, 2015 • CNN three-part video, "Breaking Free" • Polaris Project — Brandon Bushard may be a possible panelist • Hennepin County • Minneapolis Police Department — a representative has agreed to be on the panel Commissioner Pristash will contact the Minneapolis Police Department (PD) representative to see if they are able to attend either the April 28 or May 26 HRC meeting to discuss the Human Sex Trafficking topic with the HRC and help the HRC focus the October HRC Conversations event. HRC Traveling Meeting Dates/Times (cD- Covenant Village Chair Martin has talked with Covenant Village, an independent and assisted living facility, and they are very interested in hosting an HRC meeting. Depending on when the Minneapolis PD representative is available to attend the HRC meeting, the traveling meeting will be scheduled at Covenant Village for either April 28 or May 26, whichever date the Minneapolis PD representative is not attending. HRC Banner Update Chair Martin and Knauss met with Communications staff to discuss banner design ideas. Knauss will work with Communications staff and have options available for HRC to review at the March meeting. New Business Donut Talk: MN Demographics Chair Martin expressed interest in having an HRC member attend this event on March 18 from 10-11:30 am at the Crystal Community Center and provide an update back to HRC. Commissioner Phelps volunteered to attend. Potential Event Partnership for Future Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Holiday In the interest of time, it was the consensus of the HRC to discuss this at the next meeting. Golden Valley Teen Committee Meeting Update Chair Martin and Commissioner Ramlet reported that they had attended the Teen Committee's last meeting. The Teen Committee expressed a high level of interest in partnering with HRC to sponsor a future event. Human Rights Commission February 24, 2015 Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 3 HRC Essay Contest Commissioners asked if HRC had sponsored an essay contest in the past. Knauss will research and bring information to the March meeting. Adjourn Motion by Commissioner Burris, second by Commissioner Johnson to adjourn the meeting at 7:42 pm. Motion carried 8-0. Follow-up Items: • Commissioner Pristash will contact the Minneapolis Police Department (PD) representative to see if they are able to attend either the April 28 or May 26 HRC meeting to discuss the Human Sex Trafficking topic with the HRC. • Knauss will research previous HRC essay contest information. • Everyone needs to think of possible subject matter experts that may be able to serve as panelists for the October HRC Conversations event. Teresa Martin, Chair ATTEST: Chantell Knauss, Staff Liaison Approved by HRC: March 10, 2015 Human Rights Commission February 24, 2015 Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 3 ill 000uuuu �� mioop, CitY 'VI ,Yloole �uuuuuu � oma mu 'Vi101 i� lV000 � 111111 e 111 11 Physical Development Department 763-593-8030 1763-593-3988(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting April 21, 2015 Agenda Item 3. E. 1. Purchase Galaxy Radio Transmitter Modules for Water Meter Reading System Upgrade Prepared By Bert Tracy, Public Works Maintenance Manager Summary Golden Valley Public Works is in the process of upgrading water meter reading system to the new Galaxy Fixed Base Meter Reading System. Wireless Galaxy transmitter modules will be installed on every water meter throughout the City. Purchase and installation of the Galaxy radio module is required to read the water meters in the fixed base meter reading system. The Galaxy radio transmitter module upgrades are an integral part of the radio meter reading system. The purchase of the transmitter modules will be funded by the Water and Sanitary Sewer Enterprise Account (W&SS-063, page 87) as listed in the 2015-2019 Capital Improvement Program. Public Works staff has received quotes from Metering and Technology Solutions, and National Meter and Automation, Inc. The price quotes are listed below for the Model 25 Gallon RTR with Galaxy Module for a quantity of 420 units. Metering and Technology Solutions $190.00 per unit Total $79,800 National Meter and Automation, Inc. $215.30 per unit Total $90,326 Recommended Action Motion to approve purchase of the Galaxy Radio Transmitter Model 25 Gallon RTR with Galaxy Modules from Metering Technology and Solutions for a cost of$79,800. c1f, t golden MEMO ! hry. valley Physical Development Department 763-593-8030/763-593-3988(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting April 21, 2015 Agenda Item 3. E. 2. Authorize Contract for 2015 Brookview Golf Course Pond Buffer Implementation Prepared By Jeff Oliver, PE, City Engineer Eric Eckman, Public Works Specialist Summary In 2013, the City completed a study to assess the feasibility of creating and establishing native vegetation buffers around the water bodies within Brookview Golf Course. Many of the water bodies within the golf course have a connection to Bassett Creek, either by pipe or during flood events. Native vegetation buffers provide a number of benefits including helping to protect and improve water resources by stabilizing eroded shorelines, filtering and taking up excess nutrients, and deterring goose populations. The study determined that it was feasible to create buffers around several of the water bodies and recommended a phased and prioritized approach to implementation. As identified in the City's 2015-2019 Capital Improvement Program, funding has been provided in 2015, 2016 and 2017 to begin constructing many of these buffers. The areas identified by golf course staff for implementation in 2015 include Ponds N and 0 near the 141h and 151h fairways, as shown in the attached project location map. The buffers will look similar in appearance to the native vegetation planted around the ponds in the adjacent Brookview Park, except the golf course plantings will be lower-lying to facilitate playability of the course. The attached concept plan shows the general location of the buffer areas. Proposals were solicited from three professional consulting firms that specialize in creating and managing native vegetation buffers. Two proposals were received: Applied Ecological Services $32,212.51 Minnesota Native Landscapes, Inc. $43,488.00 Staff has reviewed the quotes and found them to be accurate and in order. The proposals include vegetation management over three growing seasons to ensure successful establishment. Funding for this project is provided in the City's 2015-2019 Capital Improvement Program, Storm Sewer Section (SS-12, page 77) in the amount of$50,000 in 2015. A portion of the remaining funds for this project will be devoted to educational signage and communications materials in the clubhouse and on the golf course. Attachments • Project Location Map (1 page) • Proposed Buffer Concept Plan (1 page) • Applied Ecological Services Proposal for City of Golden Valley, dated March 13, 2015 (16 pages) Recommended Action Motion to authorize a contract with Applied Ecological Services in the amount of$32,212.51 for the 2015 Brookview Golf Course Pond Buffer Implementation, City Project No. 15-17. Bass re as � a c c _ V �Q�v�11e`I Golden Valley Rd ,Q GO% is as • c 55 State h wy No SS CO tate IV o, 4P l f Pond O Pond N Harold Ave CO Western Ave a d � �esta�h -49 Ewald-re, Location Map Print Source:orce:te:3/9/15 City of Golden Valley for alt GIS layers. e 2015 Brookview Buffer Project (15.17) Not to Scale N ` 898 ,: 910 Hole 15 s • e9 w ♦vA a Construction .a ,Access.: Proposed Buffer Strips low grasses, sedges, wildflowers N low wetland veg existing fairways ° � uffer g" uffer Liam . 2 Sources: Print Date:4/13/2015 �1LLGn� PepnHiLia,.C. (2014), osOfficefor e g Brookview Golf Course - Proposed Buffer Concept P, NR 12-FIItC,f-s(2011) valley Cdy f Gfor2-Fool Cont°urs fh,r la ,inch=ioot -Cdy oI Golden Dalley/or all other layers. 2 Aa A #9 a I t Ai I • • • • • • • AAMR• • • w Q Vol Y . w I This page intentionally left blank. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. COMPANY BACKGROUND INFORMATION...............................................1 2. NARRATIVE................................................................................................2-4 3. SCHEDULE......................................................................................................5 4. PROPOSED SEED MIXES...........................................................................6-7 5. COST ESTIMATE............................................................................................8 6. EXAMPLE PROJECTS...............................................................................9-11 7. REFERENCES...............................................................................................12 APPLIED ECOLOGICAL SERVICES Specialists in Ecological Science, Restoration,Management,and Research 1. Company Background Applied Ecological Services was established in 1978 by founder and owner Steven I. Apfelbaum, an ecologist who has built a reputation as one of the country's leading ecologists. In the 1970s and 80s, Apfelbaum's earliest projects were groundbreaking remediation projects for which he designed reclamation plans and f invented new techniques for implementation. Because no source existed for native seed and plants, he collected native grass and forb seed in the wild to establish a nursery that was capable of producing vegetation materials to accomplish his reclamation plans. InformationAES Company Over the last 35 years, AES has grown into one of the nation's most respected ecological Business Name: Applied Ecological Services,Inc. services companies, with a staff of 120 and Office Address: offices in Wisconsin, Illinois, Minnesota, Iowa, Mushtown Road Kansas, Pennsylvania and New York. Consulting • •. and design services work in collaboration with our experienced ecological contractors—playing a key role in implementing on-the-ground Company Headquarters: 17921 W.Smith Road ecological projects. These two divisions are Brodhead,WI 53520 backed by our nursery division —Taylor Creek Restoration Nurseries—one of the largest, most diverse native seed and plant nurseries in the Length of U.S. Established 1978(37 years) At AES, we seek to design landscapes with an infusion of serious ecology. AES concepts of eco- functional site design rest not only on the time- honored precepts of landscape architecture but they also draw from the wellspring of ecological science and the Land Ethic espoused by Aldo Leopold. 1 APPLIED ECOLOGICAL SERVICES Specialists in Ecological Science, Restoration,Management,and Research 2. Narrative Project Understanding Applied Ecological Services (AES) appreciates the opportunity to provide a proposal for the conversion of portions of Brookview Golf Course in Golden Valley to native wet meadow. The areas proposed to be restored to native wetland vegetation have been a chronic, problem wet area for golf course staff. AES understand there is a delicate balance to restore portions of turf or degraded wetland edges but still maintain an aesthetic appearance for golf course staff and users. During the mandatory pre-bid meeting it was discussed that a significant amount of coordination will need to take place between the restoration contractor and the golf course staff. It was also apparent that the city of Golden Valley is looking for the best product for the best price and so there will be some thought into the approach of restoring these areas to native vegetation. Below is AES' approach to restoring native vegetation to Pond N, Pond 0, and the low area in between the two ponds. It is worth noting that industry standards and approach for restoration ecology differ greatly from industry standards and approach for golf course maintenance. AES is prepared to provide information to city staff or golf course user to help understand the process better. Approach Prem Herbicirl!e Prep Herbicide is needed to control vegetation prior to installing native seed. This will be completed using a non-selective herbicide, such as RoundUp, applied with an ATV and boom spray rig or backpack sprayer. It is critical to ensure adequate control of perennial species before installing native seed. Multiple applications spread over several weeks or even months are sometimes needed to control species such as reed canary grass, which is present around both ponds. If adequate control is not completed, the native seeding may be unsuccessful because the re-establishment of species like reed canary grass from rhizomes or the seed bank in the soil. AES recommends completing two herbicide applications of the pond buffers during the 2015 growing season, and one application of the turf grass area between the ponds. This will cause the project to be completed over the course of the entire growing season, but it is necessary to ensure successful establishment of the native vegetation. It could also potentially help save money during the management phase. 2 APPLIED ECOLOGICAL SERVICES Specialists in Ecological Science, Restoration,Management,and Research F�rep Mowinjj Prep mowing is utilized to control annual weeds that may come up during the preparation process. It can also help knock down thatch and stimulate weed seeds in the soil to germinate before another application of herbicide. Mowing will be completed using a pull behind ATV mower and/or hand cut with weed whips or brush saws. AES recommends cutting the vegetation of the two pond areas before the second application of herbicide to control annual weeds and make the preparation process more thorough. Minor soil prep will be needed prior to installing native seed. It will be completed using a harrow drag and hand raking. AES feels it is not necessary to till or disc the entire area as that can bring more weed seeds to the surface which would require more control during the preparation process. Pond N will require some minor grading to help smooth the existing eroding slopes and undulations of the soil. This will be completed using a small skid steer and hand shovels/rakes. All of the areas will be drug with a harrow before seeding. AES recommends only minor soil prep of areas receiving native seed and minor soil grading of Pond 0. Native Seeding, Installation of native seed will be completed using a small no till drill or by hand. If completed by hand the seed will be installed at half of the rate one direction, and the other half of the rate at a direction perpendicular to the first. This will help ensure even seed distribution.The areas hand seeded will also be hand raked or run over with a harrow drag after installing the large (fluff) seed). There is not a specified seed mix, so AES is recommending a mix that fits the aesthetic desires of the city and utilizes species low in stature and include some wildflowers for color. AES recommends installing the seed evenly throughout the areas so that species are seen across the entire area rather than in small bands. It will look more natural and allow for appropriate species to establish in micro habitats that may be present. Sedge meadow mixes tend to be more expensive. AES has drafted a list and a potential alternate list based on height, color, bloom time, and overall cost.The final species mix can be determined in consultation with the City of Golden Valley prior to seeding. 3 APPLIED ECOLOGICAL SERVICES Specialists in Ecological Science, Restoration,Management,and Research The areas to receive native seed are relatively flat, but will still need some erosion control. Pond N has steep slopes going down to the water's edge and will require erosion control blanket to be installed after native seeding. Pond 0 and the wet area in between are flat and will be straw mulched with certified weed free straw. AES observed a significant amount of goose droppings during the pre-bid meeting. Waterfowl, geese in particular, can be very detrimental to the establishment of native seedlings. They sometimes eat the cover crop seed that has been installed with the native seed. More often they will browse both the cover crop and native seed as seedlings before they can get established. Native species can handle some browsing, but geese tend to be very aggressive and can kill the seedlings over time with over browsing. Once the cover crop and native species have begun to establish, they are much more tolerant of browsing, and even some heavy browsing. AES recommends that goose fencing be installed after native seeding for the first full growing season. If the goose pressure is still high into the second growing season, it may need to be left up part way through the second season. If nothing is done to deter the geese from browsing, the native seeding is likely to fail. Management AES always recommends at least 3 years of management after initial installation of native seed. It is important to control non-native annual and perennial species while the native seedlings establish. Native species put most of their resources into growing deep roots for the first 1-3 years and so may not be more than a couple of inches tall and will not flower. Once they have adequate root growth, they begin to put energy into the leaves and flowers. During this establishment period is it critical to control and manage non-native species.This usually requires a trained eye that knows a native seedling from a problematic species. Management will consist of mowing, spot herbicide, and eventually prescribed burning. Mowing is completed to control annual and biannual weeds during the first couple of years. Spot herbicide is completed to control perennial, problematic species such as reed canary grass, thistles, purple loosestrife, bird's foot trefoil, crown vetch, and others. A more detailed approach and schedule will be provided prior to the management period beginning. It was mentioned during the pre-bid meeting how important management is, and how it can be important for the same contractor installing native seed to also perform the initial management. The management is tied to the guarantee of the native seeding and it can be an awkward transition if another contractor is asked to manage without knowing the details of the prep and installation. 4 APPLIED ECOLOGICAL SERVICES Specialists in Ecological Science, Restoration,Management,and Research 3. Schedule Below is a tentative schedule of the proposed restoration activities. While the schedule may not be consistent with golf course maintenance activities or golf course traffic, there is some flexibility with the schedule, especially the time of the day. AES understands that the golf course will be open and actively used. To ensure minimal disturbance of course users and staff, AES is willing to discuss and coordinate a schedule that makes the most sense for all parties involved. The tentative schedule assumes preparing the site through most of the 2015 growing season with native seed installed in the fall. Again, there can be some flexibility with this schedule, but AES feels that adequate control is extremely important prior to native seeding for a successful wetland restoration. Year Date Task Notes 2015 late May,early June Prep Herbicide Pond N and Pond O late July,early August Prep Mow Pond N and Pond 0 September,early October Prep Herbicide Pond N, Pond 0, and turf between October/November Soil Prep/grading October/November Native Seeding October/November Erosion Control 2016 June Management Mowing July/August Spot Herbicide September Management Mowing 2017 May Management Mowing June/July Spot Herbicide August/September Spot Herbicide 2018 June Spot Herbicide August Spot Herbicide 5 APPLIED ECOLOGICAL SERVICES Specialists in Ecological Science, Restoration,Management,and Research 4. Proposed Seed Mix Low-Moderate Stature Wet to Wet-Mesic Prairie Species Common Name Oz/acre Calamagrostis canadensis Blue joint grass 1.6 Carex annectens Yellow-fruited sedge 2.4 Carex scoparia Broom sedge 2.4 Elymus virginicus Viriginia wild rye 64 Juncus dudleyi Dudley's rush 0.05 Juncus effusus Common rush 0.4 Panicum virgatum Switch grass 3.2 Scirpus atrovirens Green bulrush 0.6 Spartina pectinate Prairie cord grass 4 Asclepias incarnata Swamp milkweed 1.6 Aster puniceus Marsh aster 1.6 Boltonia asteroides False aster 1.6 Desmodium canadense Showy tick trefoil 2.4 Eupatorium perfoliatum Common boneset 2.4 Helenium autumnale Sneezeweed 2.4 Hypericum pyramidatum Great St. Johns wort 1.6 Iris virginica shrevei Blue flag iris 2.4 Liatris spicata Marsh blazing star 1.6 Lycopus americanus American water horehound 1.6 Mimulus ringens Monkey flower 0.1 Monarda fistulosa Bergamot 3.2 Oenothera biennis Common evening primrose 4 Penstemon calycosus Small beardtongue 0.8 Polygonum pensylvanicum Pinkweed 5.6 Ratibida pinnata Yellow coneflower 3.2 Solidago riddellii Riddell's goldenrod 2.4 Verbena hastata Blue vervain 0.8 Veronicastrum virginicum Culver's root 0.16 6 APPLIED ECOLOGICAL SERVICES Specialists in Ecological Science, Restoration,Management,and Research Proposed Alternate Seed Mix Species Common Name Oz/acre Alisma subcordatum Water Plantain 0.32 Anemone canadensis Canada Anemone 0.32 Asclepias incarnata Swamp Milkweed 2.56 Aster novae-angliae New England Aster 0.64 Aster umbellatus Flat-topped Aster 0.32 Bromus ciliatus Fringed Brome 7.68 Calamagrostis canadensis Blue Joint Grass 0.96 Carex bebbii Bebb's Oval Sedge 1.92 Carex comosa Bottlebrush Sedge 2.56 Carex hystricina Porcupine Sedge 2.56 Carex stipata Fox Sedge 1.92 Carex vulpinoidea Brown Fox Sedge 2.56 Elymus virginicus Virginia Wild Rye 31.2 Eupatorium maculatum Joe Pye Weed 0.64 Eupatorium perfoliatum Boneset 0.64 Glyceria grandis American Manna Grass 2.4 Glyceria striata Fowl Manna Grass 0.96 Helenium autumnale Sneezeweed 0.32 Hypericum pyramidatum Great St. John's Wort 0.32 Iris virginica shrevei Southern Blue Flag Iris 2.56 Juncus effusus Common Rush 0.32 Liatris pycnostachya Prairie Blazingstar 1.28 Lobelia siphilitica Great Blue Lobelia 0.32 Poa palustris Fowl Bluegrass 4.8 Pycnanthemum Mountain Mint 0.32 vir inianum Rudbeckia hirta Black-eyed Susan 0.96 Scirpus atrovirens Green Bulrush 0.64 Scirpus cyperinus Woolgrass 0.64 Scirpus fluviatilis River Bulrush 1.28 Scirpus validus Softstem Bulrush 1.6 Solidago riddellii Riddell's Goldenrod 0.32 Thalictrum dasycarpum Purple Meadow Rue 1.28 Verbena hastata Blue Vervain 0.64 Vernonia fasciculate Common Ironweed 0.64 Veronicastrum virginicum Culver's Root 0.32 Zizia aurea Golden Alexanders 1.28 7 APPLIED ECOLOGICAL SERVICES Specialists in Ecological Science,Restoration,Management,and Research 5. Cost Estimate Item Qty Unit Unit Cost Extended POND N Site Prep Herbicide 2 trip $ 225.00 $ 450.00 Soil Prep/Grading,Shaping 1 trip $ 1,803.00 $ 1,803.00 Low Naitve Wetland Seeding 0.15 acre $ 3,427.00 $ 514.05 Erosion Control Blanket 726 SY $ 1.73 $ 1,255.98 POND O Site Prep Herbicide 3 trip $ 760.00 $ 2,280.00 Site Prep Mowing 1 trip $ 663.00 $ 663.00 Low Naitve Wetland Seeding 2.36 acre $ 3,427.00 $ 8,087.72 Straw Mulch 2.36 acre $ 891.00 $ 2,102.76 WETLAND AREA(BETWEEN PONDS) Site Prep Herbicide 1 trip $ 294.00 $ 294.00 Low Naive Wetland Seeding 0.25 acre $ 3,427.00 $ 856.75 Straw Mulch 0.25 acre $ 891.00 $ 222.75 Total $ 18,530.01 ALTERNATES: Item Qty Unit Unit Cost Extended Goose Fencing (if not installed by course staff) 2450 If $ 2.97 $ 7,276.50 Signage('Prairie in Progress') 1 each NO CHARGE 3 Year Management YEAR 1 Mowing 2 trip $ 697.00 $ 1,394.00 Spot Herbicide 1 trip $ 863.00 $ 863.00 YEAR 2 Mowing 1 trip $ 697.00 $ 697.00 Spot Herbicide 2 trip $ 863.00 $ 1,726.00 YEAR 3 Spot Herbicide 2 trip $ 863.00 $ 1,726.00 8 APPLIED ECOLOGICAL SERVICES Specialists in Ecological Science, Restoration,Management,and Research 6. Example Projects PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS Following are three project descriptions from similar work completed by AES that demonstrate the quality of service and restoration expertise that AES will bring to this project. Client references follow this project summary. Doar Prairie Restoration Client:City of New Richmond Size: 11 acres Timeline:2008-2014 When New Richmond decided to convert city-owned land into a public park,the City asked Applied Ecological Services to help transform the site into a natural area. The park also contained recreational areas complete with walking trails and a parking lot. A major focus of the site conversion was the elimination of dominant, non-native vegetation,which was then r replaced with a native prairie landscape. Native tree and shrub plantings were intermixed to create an aesthetically pleasing landscape. The initial steps of the restoration process began during the 2008 growing season.AES first performed site preparation activities including using prescribed burning treatments and preparatory herbicide to remove nonnative vegetation. Next,AES installed native seed the next spring(2009), along with 95 native trees and shrubs and 300 native plant plugs. Management mowing and spot herbiciding `t were conducted during the 2009 growing season. Many early successional native species were already observed ► in 2009,although AES continued to manage the area through 2014. Now,the restored park provides the community with a beautiful prairie landscape to enjoy.Community members walking or running on the nearby trail especially M , enjoy the changing, diverse colors of the native plants throughout the year.The native prairie also provides wildlife habitat and connects to park to other adjacent a" green spaces within the city. 9 APPLIED ECOLOGICAL SERVICES Specialists in Ecological Science, Restoration,Management,and Research Example Projects (continued) Dean Lakes Restorat r Client: Ryan Companies Size:88 acres Timeline:2003-2014 Applied Ecological Services,in partnership with Brauer& Associates,created a conservation development plan for the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, entitled,"Dean Lakes Area Park,Open Space and Trail Master Plan."This plan represented the culmination of ecological study, conservation planning and public input from City staff and the greater community. The ultimate conclusion of the master plan was that the site area represented one of the most ecologically unique and significant natural areas in Shakopee.Therefore, development of the site was envisioned to entail a diffuse stormwater management system (that extended throughout the development) and future stormwater management areas.The plan also created enhanced/restored natural areas around Dean Lakes and passive recreational opportunities,which included public walking trails. Working with the site developer(Ryan Companies, US), AES developed and implemented a site-specific Ecological Restoration and Management Plan(ERMP).The ERMP identified seven distinct ecological communities to be enhanced/restored throughout the site's 88-acre Conservation Area.The ERMP also provided detailed specifications for establishment and management of the restored areas. AES' Contracting Division performed site preparation before construction phases of the project began.This work included invasive plant species removal.AES then seeded and planted the restoration areas,eventually restoring and enhancing the site's oak woodlands, savannas, prairies and wetlands.AES also constructed wetland mitigation areas on the site, and contributed to interpretive signage found throughout the conservation area.Annual ecological maintenance and monitoring by AES continues through 2014. Management activities included brushing and invasive species removal at the site to ensure the future health of the area. 10 APPLIED ECOLOGICAL SERVICES Specialists in Ecological Science, Restoration,Management,and Research Example Projects (continued) Metropolitan Council System-Wide Native Restoration & Maintenance Client: Metropolitan Council—Environmental Services Size:St. Paul,Cottage Grove, Empire, MN (multiple sites) Timeline: 2009-2011,2012-present In 2008,Applied Ecological Services provided a detailed proposal for restoration and management of various sites within the Metropolitan Council system,which is located in and around St. Paul, Minnesota. The project included the Metro Plant in St. Paul,Cottage Grove Park and Ride, Eagles Point Waste Water Treatment Plant(WWTP)in Cottage Grove,and Empire WWTP in Empire.The restoration and management plan consisted of site-specific needs.These varied from general management of existing native prairies to creation of brand new restoration areas. Many of the sites were new or had not been maintained. AES started work in 2009 and continued through the end of 2011.AES was again awarded a system-wide maintenance contract for the same sites(with some additions)in 2012, continuing through the end of 2015. Additional project sites included Empire Wetland, Lift Station 73, Lift Station 79,Orono Lift Station and the Regional Maintenance Facility. As a result of AES'ecological design and management r' solutions,all of the Metropolitan Council system sites improved in quality and diversity of native vegetation. ,. 11 APPLIED ECOLOGICAL SERVICES Specialists in Ecological Science, Restoration,Management,and Research 7. References City of New Richmond 156 East 1st Street New Richmond, WI 54017 Jeremiah Wendt, Director of Public Works (715) 243-0439 jwendt@newrichmondwi.gov Project: Door Prairie Restoration Ryan Companies US, Inc. 121 S. 8th Street, #200 Minneapolis, MN 55402 Melanie Peterson, Assistant Property Manager (612) 492-4363 melanie.peterson@ryancompanies.com Project: Dean Lakes Restoration Metropolitan Council—Environmental Services 390 Robert St. North St. Paul, MN 55101 Jeff Schwarz, Project Manager (651) 602-1176 Jeffrey.schwarz@metc.state.mn.us Project: Metropolitan Council System-Wide Native Restoration & Maintenance 12 r , { N $ S a 1 k �r APPLIED ECOLOGICAL SERVICES Specialists in Ecological Science, Restoration, Management, and Research 2015 Brookview Golf Course Buffer Implementation - Ponds N and O � 3 Contact: Matthew LaschApplied Ecological Services ; e W��lti, • • • �t matt.laschgappliedeco.com cf ' Wen valley, Administrative Services Department 763-593-8013/763-593-3969(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting April 21, 2015 Agenda Item 3. F. Approve Requests for Beer and/or Wine at Brookview Park Prepared By Kris Luedke, City Clerk Summary As per City Code Section 10.83, Subd. 2 I. "No person shall possess, display, consume or use alcoholic beverages on any City park property, unless permission is granted by the Council." As part of the application process for a Facilities Use Permit to use the large and small picnic shelters at Brookview Park the applicant has the option to pay an additional $25 to be able to serve beer and/or wine. Attached is a list of the individuals and/or organizations who have requested that option. Attachments • Beer and/or wine request list (1 page) Recommended Action Motion to approve the requests for beer and/or wine at Brookview Park as recommended by staff. BEER AND/OR WINE REQUEST LIST INDIVIDUAL OR ORGANIZATION CC DATE DATE TIME SHELTER APPROVED Wendy Dehkes - General Mills 06-11 11 am -4 pm Small 04-21-15 Linh Wagner Itasca Consulting 08-09 11 am -4 pm Large 04-21-15 Juilian Garcia 05-17 11 am -4 pm Small 04-21-15 Juilian Garcia 05-17 5 pm - 10 pm Small 04-21-15 Angela Jesse - TCF Bank 08-14 11 am - 4 pm Small 04-21-15 Tate Krosschell - Cushman &Wakefield 08-12 11 am - 4 pm Large 04-21-15 Tate Krosschell - Cushman & Wakefield 08-12 5 pm - 10 pm Large 04-21-15 Lola Nelson 05-02 11 am - 4 pm Large 04-21-15 10 golik- ti e MEMORANDUM valley Administrative Services Department 763-593-8013/763-593-3969(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting April 212015 Agenda Item 3. G. Resolution Authorizing a Corrected Certification of Special Assessments Prepared By Susan Virnig, Finance Director Summary On October 1, 2013, City Council approved Resolution 13-84 that certified public improvements to five parcels for the Eldridge 31d Addition. This resolution will remove one parcel assessment to be added to the remaining four parcels. This new resolution will allow Hennepin County to apply the remaining assessment on one parcel to the other four parcels as outlined in the attached Resolution, Attachments • Resolution Authorizing a Corrected Certification of Special Assessments on Public Improvements Construction for Eldridge 3rd Addition P.U.D. 109 (Resolution 13-84). Recommended Action Motion to adopt Resolution Authorizing a Corrected Certification of Special Assessments on Public Improvements Construction for Eldridge 3rd Addition P.U.D. 109 (Resolution 13-84). Resolution 15-34 April 21, 2015 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A CORRECTED CERTIFICATION OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS ON PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTION FOR ELDRIDGE 3RD ADDITION P.U.D. 109 (RESOLUTION 13-84) WHEREAS, the City Council approved Resolution 13-84 on October 1, 2013 certifying special assessments on Public Improvements Construction for Eldridge 3rd Addition P. U. D. 109; and WHEREAS, the amount included of the remaining assessment of $ needs to be removed on PID; and WHEREAS, the amount $ needs to be added to the four parcels; and WHEREAS, the Resolution supersedes Resolution No, 13-84 with respect to the parcels identified below. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Golden Valley approves: 1. That the above assessment of $29,062.24 will be removed from PID 07-029-24-31-0119 4910 Triton Drive 2. That the following amount $29,868.24 will be added to the following PIDs; 07-029-24-31-0120 3115 Perry Ave N $7,265.56 07-029-24-31-0121 3125 Perry Ave N $7,265.56 07-029-24-31-0122 3142 Perry Ave N $7,265.56 07-029-24-31-0123 3124 Perry Ave N $7,265.56 3. The assessments will be for the remaining period of eight years at 6percent interest as per original certification. Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: Kristine A Luedke, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by the City Clerk. City Arl All' M 0 R A N D U M goldeti &a valley Administrative Services Department 763-593-80131763-593-3969(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting April 21, 2015 Agenda Item 3. H. 2014 General Fund Transfer Prepared By Sue Virnig, Finance Director Summary The monthly financial report provides a progress report of the following funds: General Fund Operations Per General Fund Balance Policy, 60%of expenditures should be reserved. In 2015, adopted expenditures are $16,902,135. 2015 Fund Balance should be at $10,141,281. The 2014 Fund Balance amount is $10,833,362. Staff recommends moving$690,000 from Fund Balance to the Building Improvement Fund. Remodeling the lower level in City Hall and planning for replacement of Brookview Community Center will be top priorities in the Building Improvement Fund. Attachments • December 2014 General Fund Financial Reports (2 pages) • Fund Balance Analysis (1 page) • Resolution Authorizing the Transfer of$692,000 from the General Fund to the Building Improvement Fund (1 page) Recommended Action Motion to adopt Resolution Authorizing the Transfer of$692,000 from the General Fund to the Building Improvement Fund. City of Golden Valley Monthly Budget Report-General Fund Expenditures December, 2014(unaudited) Over % 2014 December YTD (Under) Of Budget Division Budget Actual Actual Budget Expend. ooi Council $296,340 40,435 265,270 ($31,070) 89.52% (1) 003 City Manager 774,980 54,388 694,285 (80,695) 89.59% (2) 004 Transfers Out 294,710 0 294,710 0 100.00% 005 Admin. Services 1,692,280 142,610 1,682,785 (9,495) 99.44% (3) 006 Legal 135,000 24,214 134,296 (704) 99.48% 007 Risk Management 300,000 (33,540) 240,917 (59,083) 80.31% (4) oil General Gov't. Bldgs, 556,990 100,897 613,628 56,638 110.17% (5) 016 Planning 346,195 23,712 302,542 (43,653) 87.39% (6) 018 Inspections 661,545 73,971 677,757 16,212 102.45% (7) 022 Police 5,202,175 486,476 5,074,608 (127,567) 97.55% (8) 023 Fire 1,200,190 79,712 1,034,704 (165,486) 86.21% (9) 035 Physical Dev Admin 344,315 25,578 356,927 12,612 103.66% (10) 036 Engineering 691,880 91,472 559,173 (132,707) 80.82% (11) 037 Streets 1,444,410 120,331 1,501,652 57,242 103.96% (12) 065 Community Center 74,100 15,768 67,096 (7,004) 90.55% 066 Park& Rec.Admin, 679,345 55,764 658,065 (21,280) 96.87% (13) 067 Park Maintenance 1,071,490 84,301 1,039,527 (31,963) 97.02% (14) 068 Recreation Programs 502,830 39,839 303,646 (199,184) 60.39% (15) TOTAL Expenditures $16,268,775 $1,425,928 $15,501,588 ($767,187) 95.28% (1)Civil Service, HRC,OSRC, BZA and Envision Commission were under budget. (2)City Clerk was not hired until April. HR Sevices were not needed. (3)Additional hours for special network services from LOGIS were not needed. (4) LMCIT Dvidend was$38,340. (5) Electric and Gas Service was higner than budgeted. (6) Staffing changes and no car allowance made after July. (7) Market adjustments on salaries and additional temporary staff needs. (8) Staffing changes made and vacancies (9) Delay in hiring process for Deputy Fire Chief plus lower hours for fire calls. (10) Department changes were made. (11) More hours charged to poejcts along with lower electrical costs than budgeted. (12) Market adjustments to salaries and vehicle maintenance charges were higher than budgeted. (13) Llower supplies and services compared to budget. (14) Less wages for seasonal help compared to budget. (15)Various programs were under budget amount: softball, summer park, hockey, soccer, broomball, and tennis. City of Golden Valley Monthly Budget Report-General Fund Revenues December, 2014 Percentage Of Year Completed 100.00% Over % 2014 November YTD (Under) of Budget Type Budget Actual Actual Budget Received Ad Valorem Taxes $12,358,005 6,004,304 12,431,386 $73,381 100.59% (1) Licenses 210,785 8,475 268,671 $57,886 127.46% (2) Permits 809,500 54,196 1,210,632 $401,132 149.55% (3) Federal Grants 0 5,691 31,589 $31,589 State Aid 255,390 111,250 252,909 ($2,481) 99.03% Hennepin County Aid 31,205 0 31,758 $553 Charges For Services: General Government 45,050 409 49,787 $4,737 110.51% Public Safety 163,870 14,792 166,032 $2,162 101.32% Public Works 141,000 25,611 168,169 $27,169 119.27% (4) Park& Rec 525,270 25,706 382,520 ($142,750) 72.82% (5) Other Funds 981,500 63,088 903,459 ($78,041) 92.05% Fines& Forfeitures 320,000 44,904 310,318 ($9,682) 96.97% Interest On Investments 100,000 67,758 67,758 ($32,242) 67.76% Miscellaneous Revenue 227,200 66,610 251,977 $24,777 110.91% Transfers In 100,000 8,333 100,000 $0 100.00% TOTAL Revenue $16,268,775 $6,501,127 $16,626,965 $358,190 102.20% Notes: (1) Delinquent Tax payment were made. (2)Apratment Licenses increase due to Arcata Building. (3) Permits increased due to many development projects. (4) Tennis progam was changed after budget was approved. (5) Tennis lesson revenue is contractual versus lesson revenue. CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY GENERALFUND FUND BALANCE ANALYSIS Fund Balance @ 01/01/14 $9,707,985 Actual Revenue-2014 (breakdown on 12-14 report) $16,626,965 Actual Expenditures-2014 (breakdown on 12-14 report) 15,501,588 Excess of Revenue Over(Under) Expenditures 1,125,377 Estimated Fund Balance @ 12/31/14 10,833,362 Per Fund Balance Policy Expenditures-2015 16,902,135 Excess of Revenue Over(Under) Expenditures 10,141,281 Amount Available $692,081 Building Fund- Remodeling Lower Level City Hall; Brookview Community Center 692,000 TOTAL 2015 TRANSFER for 2014 $692,000 Resolution 15-35 April 21, 2015 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE TRANSFER OF $692,000 FROM THE GENERAL FUND TO THE BUILDING IMPROVEMENT FUND WHEREAS, the General Fund Reserves meets 60% of 2015 expenditures; and WHEREAS, the transfer of $692,000 to the Building Improvement Fund would fund costs with remodeling the lower level of City Hall for ease of use for customers and planning for the replacement of Brookview Community Center. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Golden Valley to authorize the transfer of $692,000 from the General Fund to the Building Improvement Fund. Shepard Harris, Mayor ATTEST: Kristine A Luedke, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by the City Clerk. Cit0 golden MEMORANDUM valley Administrative Services Department 763-593-8013/763-593-3969(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting April 21, 2015 Agenda Item 3. I. Receipt of March 2015 Financial Reports Prepared By Sue Virnig, Finance Director Summary The monthly financial report provides a progress report of the following funds: General Fund Operations Conservation/Recycling Fund (Enterprise Fund) Water and Sewer Utility Fund (Enterprise Fund) Brookview Golf Course (Enterprise Fund) Motor Vehicle Licensing (Enterprise Fund) Storm Utility Fund (Enterprise Fund) Equipment Replacement Fund (Capital Projects Fund) General Fund Operations: As of March 2015, the City is using$2,281,200 of fund balance to balance the General Fund Budget. Attachments • March 2015 General Fund Financial Reports (2 pages) • March 2015 Conservation/Recycling Fund (1 page) • March 2015 Water and Sewer Utility Fund (1 page) • March 2015 Brookview Golf Course (1 page) • March 2015 Motor Vehicle Licensing (1 page) • March 2015 Storm Utility Fund (1 page) • March 2015 Equipment Replacement Fund (1 page) Recommended Action Motion to receive and file the March 2015 Financial Reports. City of Golden Valley Monthly Budget Report- General Fund Expenditures March, 2015 (unaudited) Over % 2015 March YTD (Under) Of Budget Division Budget Actual Actual Budget Expend. 001 Council $330,450 26,550 81,331 ($249,119) 24.61% 003 City Manager 774,940 53,646 147,498 (627,442) 19.03% 004 Transfers Out 475,000 0 0 (475,000) 0.00% (1) 005 Admin. Services 1,726,920 198,511 330,089 (1,396,831) 19.11% 006 Legal 139,050 5,913 12,796 (126,254) 9.20% (2) 007 Risk Management 300,000 396 1,664 (298,336) 0.55% 01l General Gov't, Bldgs. 560,590 28,482 80,611 (479,979) 14.38% 016 Planning 303,780 22,096 56,744 (247,036) 18.68% 018 Inspections 704,575 50,879 135,757 (568,818) 19.27% 022 Police 5,568,860 391,236 1,070,920 (4,497,940) 19.23% 023 Fire 1,255,045 103,041 273,425 (981,620) 21.79% 035 Physical Dev Admin 285,180 21,477 65,292 (219,888) 22.90% 036 Engineering 759,890 32,233 94,939 (664,951) 12.49% 037 Streets 1,473,370 90,717 310,101 (1,163,269) 21.05% 065 Community Center 75,615 5,393 13,705 (61,910) 18.12% 066 Park & Rec. Admin. 698,640 57,454 141,915 (556,725) 20.31% 067 Park Maintenance 1,095,740 90,097 213,802 (881,938) 19.51% 068 Recreation Programs 374,490 10,742 52,019 (322,471) 13.89% TOTAL Expenditures $16,902,135 $1,188,863 $3,082,608 ($13,819,527) 18.24% (1)This transfer will be made in June, 2015. (2) Legal services are through February. City of Golden Valley Monthly Budget Report-General Fund Revenues March2015 (unaudited) Percentage Of Year Completed 25.00% Over % 2015 March YTD (Under) of Budget Type Budget Actual Actual Budget Received Ad Valorem Taxes $13,266,155 0 0 ($13,266,155) 0.00% (1) Licenses 221,565 9,980 30,923 ($190,642) 13.96% Permits 800,000 65,666 282,293 ($517,707) 35.29% Federal Grants 0 0 1,135 $1,135 State Aid 261,600 0 9,919 ($251,681) 3.79% (2) Hennepin County Aid 31,205 0 25,000 ($6,205) (3) Charges For Services: General Government 19,065 267 6,441 ($12,624) 33.78% Public Safety 176,120 22,142 29,608 ($146,512) 16.81% Public Works 141,000 17,370 31,120 ($109,880) 22.07% Park& Rec 396,300 14,022 78,708 ($317,592) 19.86% Other Funds 841,500 55,110 167,794 ($673,706) 19.94% Fines & Forfeitures 320,425 30,547 51,086 ($269,339) 15.94% (4) Interest On Investments 100,000 0 0 ($100,000) 0.00% (5) Miscellaneous Revenue 227,200 16,828 62,381 ($164,819) 27.46% Transfers In 100,000 8,333 25,000 ($75,000) 25.00% (6) TOTAL Revenue $16,902,135 $240,265 $801,408 ($16,100,727) 4.74% Notes: (1) Payments are received in July, December, and January(delinquencies). (2) Police Training will be paid in August. Safe and Sober is billed on time spent. (3)Violent Offenders Task Force is run by Hennepin County. (4) Fines/Forfeitures are through February 2015. (5) Investment income is allocated at year end. (6)Transfers are monthly. City of Golden Valley Monthly Budget Report-Conservation/Recycling Enterprise Fund March 2015 (unaudited) Over 2015 March YTD (Under) % Budget Actual Actual Budget Current Revenue Hennepin County Recycling Grant 56,770 0 0 (56,770) 0.00% Recycling Charges 332,875 27,132 55,751 (277,124) 16.75% Miscellaneous Revenues 3,000 0 0 (3,000) Interest on Investments 9,000 0 0 (9,000) 0.00% (1) Total Revenue 401,645 27,132 55,751 (345,894) 13.88% Expenses: Recycling 451,460 24,520 51,613 (399,847) 11.43% (2) Total Expenses 451,460 24,520 51,613 (399,847) 11.43% (1) Interest Earnings are allocated at year-end. (2) Republic Services are billed through February. City of Golden Valley Monthly Budget Report-Water and Sewer Utility Enterprise Fund March, 2015(unaudited) Over 2015 March YTD (Under) Budget Actual Actual Budget Current Revenue Water Charges 4,360,500 217,013 548,997 (3,811,503) 12.59% Emergency Water Supply 183,600 8,660 27,687 (155,913) 15.08% Sewer Charges 3,276,450 229,439 564,617 (2,711,833) 17.23% Meter Sales 8,000 1,101 1,836 (6,164) 22.95% MCES Grant Program 0 0 19,200 19,200 Penalties 110,000 28,509 41,672 (68,328) 37.88% Charges for Other Services 90,000 13,341 49,018 (40,982) 54.46% State Water Testing Fee Pass Through 45,500 3,986 4,166 (41,334) 9.16% Sale of Assets 10,000 0 0 (10,000) 0.00% Certificate of Compliance 75,000 3,625 13,075 (61,925) 17.43% Interest Earnings 15,000 0 0 (15,000) 0.00% Total Revenue 8,174,050 505,674 1,270,268 (6,903,782) 15.54% Expenses: Utility Administration 2,436,590 184,337 236,632 (2,199,958) 9.71% Sewer Maintenance 2,752,485 202,182 557,063 (2,195,422) 20.24% Water Maintenance 4,571,485 217,940 912,141 (3,659,344) 19.95% Total Expenses 9,760,560 604,459 1,705,836 (8,054,724) 17.48% City of Golden Valley Monthly Budget Report- Brookview Golf Course Enterprise Fund March, 2015(unaudited) Course Opened March 13, 2015 Over 2015 March YTD (Under) % Budget Actual Actual Budget Current Revenue Green Fees 838,265 4,810 4,810 (833,455) 0.57% Driving Range Fees 105,000 3,284 3,337 (101,663) 3,18% Par 3 Fees 137,370 649 649 (136,721) 0.47% Lawn Bowling 38,000 0 0 (38,000) 0.00% Pro Shop Sales 80,000 1,902 1,902 (78,098) 2.38% Pro Shop Rentals 244,000 693 1,761 (242,239) 0.72% Concession Sales 281,000 1,973 4,265 (276,735) 1.52% Other Revenue 72,280 32,361 36,436 (35,844) 50.41% Interest Earnings 2,000 0 0 (2,000) 0.00% (1) Less:Credit Card Charges/Sales Tax (35,000) (512) (512) 34,488 1.46% Total Revenue 1,762,915 45,160 52,648 (1,710,267) 2.99% Expenses: Golf Operations 682,945 52,479 125,324 (557,621) 18.35% (2) Course Maintenance 695,665 59,377 127,135 (568,530) 18.28% Pro Shop 106,300 7,518 21,060 (85,240) 19.81% Grill 244,355 1,437 2,799 (241,556) 1.15% Driving Range 49,715 214 379 (49,336) 0.76% Par 3 Course 25,770 79 137 (25,633) 0.53% Lawn Bowling 20,175 0 0 (20,175) 0,00% Total Expenses 1,824,925 121,104 276,834 (1,548,091) 15.17% (1) Interest Earnings are allocated at year-end. (2) Depreciation is allocated at year-end. City of Golden Valley Monthly Budget Report-Motor Vehicle Licensing Enterprise Fund March 2015(unaudited) Over 2015 March YTD (Under) % Budget Actual Actual Budget Current Revenue Interest Earnings 2,000 0 0 (2,000) 0.00% (1) Charges for Services 406,330 36,561 97,068 (309,262) 23.89% Total Revenue 408,330 36,561 97,068 (311,262) 23.77% Expenses: Motor Vehicle Licensing 408,330 32,089 85,838 (322,492) 21.02% Total Expenses 408,330 32,089 85,838 (322,492) 21.02% (1) Interest Earnings are allocated at year-end. City of Golden Valley Monthly Budget Report-Storm Utility Enterprise Fund March, 2015(unaudited) Over 2015 March YTD (Under) % Budget Actual Actual Budget Current Revenue Interest Earnings 45,000 0 0 (45,000) 0.00% (1) Storm Sewer Charges 2,228,920 180,395 501,613 (1,727,307) 22.50% Bassett Creek Watershed 1,453,000 34,747 (1,418,253) 2.39% Miscellaneous Receipts 0 0 0 0 State Grant-Other 0 0 0 0 Total Revenue 3,726,920 180,395 536,360 (3,190,560) 14.39% Expenses: Storm Utility 2,510,590 111,903 568,533 (1,942,057) 22.65% (2) Street Cleaning 125,535 7,830 7,830 (117,705) 6.24% Environmental Control 294,465 8,631 22,097 (272,368) 7.50% Debt Service Payments 171,220 300 151,741 (19,479) 88,62% Total Expenses 3,101,810 128,664 750,201 (2,351,609) 24.19% (1) Interest Earnings are allocated at year-end. (2) Depreciation is allocated at year-end and. 2015 Equipment Replacement Fund(CIP)-Fund 5700 2015 March YTD Budget Total Actual Remaining Revenues: Proceeds-Certificate of Indebtedness 800,000 0 0 (800,000) Sale of Assets 35,000 0 0 (35,000) Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 Interest Earnings(allocated at year end) 20,365 0 0 (20,365) Total Revenues 855,365 0 0 (855,365) Expenditures: Program# Project Number Project Name 5700 Bond Expenditures 0 0 0 0 5701 V&E-001 Marked Squad Cars(Police) 75,000 302 302 74,698 (1) 5702 V&E-002 Computers and Printers(Finance) 80,000 15,858 16,092 63,908 5703 V&E-004 Phone System(Finance) 69,500 0 0 69,500 5712 V&E-024 Unmarked Police Vehicle 34,000 0 0 34,000 5712 V&E-027 Rotary Mower(Park) 98,000 0 0 98,000 5733 V&E-050 Bobcat Toolcat 50,000 0 0 50,000 5742 V&E-082 Fire Pumper 575,000 0 3,204 571,796 5795 V&E-091 Pickup Truck(Park) 50,000 0 0 50,000 5800 V&E-087 Pickup Truck(Fire) 40,000 0 0 40,000 5786 V&E-083 Passenger Vehicle(Fire) 40,000 0 0 40,000 5783 V&E-127 800 Mhz Radios(Fire) 165,500 0 146,613 18,887 5797 V&E-129 800 Mhz Radios(Police) 162,180 0 141,136 21,044 Total Expenditures 1,439,180 16,160 307,347 1,131,833 (1)Computers are replaced every 4-5 years and purchased throughout the year based on available time. c1tvs.. gold, il!"Al R A N D U PA ell Hey Va Physical Development Department 763-593-8030/763-593-3988(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting April 21, 2015 Agenda Item 3. J. Resolution Authorizing the Revision of Municipal State Aid Street Routes Prepared By Jeff Oliver, PE, City Engineer Eric Seaburg, EIT, Engineer Summary In 1959, the Minnesota Legislature adopted Minnesota State Statute 162.09, which established a Municipal State Aid (MSA) street system for cities with a population of 5,000 or more. The statute outlines criteria for the designation of state-aid routes and limited designations to 20% of the total miles of city streets. It is through this state-aid system designation that cities receive a distribution of the gas tax revenues collected by the state. The annual allotments are distributed to cities based upon the cities' MSA designated mileage and the Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) of those streets. Over the last several years, staff has been assessing the City's MSA street system and making revisions where appropriate in an effort to maximize the City's annual allotment. Streets that are included on the MSA system must connect to trunk highways, County State Aid Highway routes or other Municipal State Aid routes; and are typically classified as collectors, carry heavier traffic volumes and connect major points of traffic interest. The streets being considered for addition to the Golden Valley MSA system include the 1-394 South Frontage Road and General Mills Boulevard. These streets serve commercial areas and carry a high volume of traffic. Adding these streets to the City's MSA system will increase the City's annual allotment. The streets being considered for removal from the Golden Valley MSA system include Western Avenue and Country Club Drive. Western Avenue is a residential street and has a very low AADT in comparison to the 1-394 South Frontage Road. The section of Country Club Drive being considered for removal is that portion that used to exist between Winnetka Avenue and Rhode Island through what is now the Golden Valley Post Office site. This segment no longer carries traffic and therefore draws minimal needs. To be removed from MSA system: 1. Western Avenue (Winnetka Avenue to Jersey Avenue): 0.62 miles 2. Country Club Drive (Winnetka Avenue to Rhode Island Avenue): 0.16 miles Total Miles Removed = 0.78 miles Miles Currently Undesignated MSA = 0.03 miles Total Miles Available = 0.81 miles To be added to MSA system: 1. 1-394 South Frontage Road (City Limits to General Mills Boulevard): 0.49 miles 2. General Mills Boulevard (1-394 South Frontage Road to 1-394): 0.13 miles Total Miles Added = 0.62 miles Undesignated MSA Mileage = 0.19 miles Attachments • Location map (1 page) • Resolution Authorizing the Revision of Municipal State Aid Street Routes (1 page) Recommended Action Motion to adopt Resolution Authorizing the Revision of Municipal State Aid Street Routes. i CITY OF CI ST.LOUIS PAR P MOUTH,-f-- i"\�E CISY OF.PLYM OUTH� Mendelssoha Ave t _. •�' ---- i C Oko ♦ e i w �su Decatur A,&e N Y� F _ Boon ° ,-✓ ��aesal ills HhM" '�" • � Ir � Wi co to, e► � N"Av�1�Y`""l (J P C a 1 =s�etgvea ?4nnetka♦AveN Winnetka Ave N KFGO lo Ave s P g i F �? 'n �� ♦o Nev d Avg N� o )ia ouisiaveI tv r.pshimerl2jidaAveS �. ll°uglas Dr N /1,41bouglas Dr N�_ 1 K Zane AveN r- , ." m m '1CASla Tu:n � •rn i ` ossxoad N Lilac DY N....................• - s i a 1 U .Noble Ave N..'•---_-..�...... Meadow Ln 40-10—WITY OF RO BBINSDAL r ITY OF MINN9 OLIS r e i ". .' Zenith Ave N' a i � m l CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS CITY OF.MINNEA PO LIS a € D -4 -i 89 D 0 a a N 3 az o o .i; N S. oy a C p CD m a D wm c C. 3 Cn (0 o o 3 n N m lin elm N w v D �m m y (Q Cy3 C C D9i nD 7, o D _ ga no 3 o N m 3 m cD CA 3 n m w Q o F'♦ t aaan D a as m Cm D Cn no H 3 0 0 0 tio cDNOJD W N W(AG W O)N J W Resolution 15-36 April 21 , 2015 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE REVISION OF MUNICIPAL STATE AID STREET ROUTES WHEREAS, the City Council has the power and authority, pursuant to Minnesota Administrative Rules 8820.08, to designate Municipal State Aid Streets; and WHEREAS, it appears that the existing Municipal State Aid Street Routes should be updated to reflect the current traffic patterns on the City's street system. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council for the City of Golden Valley to authorize the revision of the City's Municipal State Aid Street Routes as follows: To be removed from MSA system: 1. Western Avenue (Winnetka Avenue to Jersey Avenue) 2. Country Club Drive (Winnetka Avenue to Rhode Island Avenue) To be added to MSA system: 1 . 1-394 Frontage Road (City Limits to General Mills Boulevard) 2. General Mills Boulevard (1-394 Frontage Road to 1-394) Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by the City Clerk. l of iii yME a , valley IN CIS Physical Development Department 763-593-8030 1763-593-3988 (fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting April 21, 2015 Agenda Item 3. K. Proclamation for National Public Works Week Prepared By Jeff Oliver, PE, City Engineer Bert Tracy, Public Works Maintenance Manager Summary To recognize the Golden Valley Public Works Department employees during National Public Works Week, please consider adoption of the attached proclamation for National Public Works Week on May 17 through May 23, 2015. Attachments • Proclamation For National Public Works Week (1 page) Recommended Action Motion to adopt the Proclamation for National Public Works Week. CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY PROCLAMATION FOR NATIONAL PUBLIC WORKS WEEK WHEREAS, public works services provided in the City of Golden Valley are an integral part of our citizens' everyday lives; and WHEREAS, the support of an understanding and informed citizenry is vital to the efficient operation of public works systems and programs such as water, sanitary and storm sewers, streets and highways, forestry, public buildings, solid waste collection, and maintenance of parks; and WHEREAS, the health, safety and comfort of this community greatly depends on these facilities and services; and WHEREAS, the quality and effectiveness of these facilities, as well as their planning, design, and construction, is vitally dependent upon the efforts and skill of public works employees; and WHEREAS, understanding the role that public infrastructure plays in protecting the environment, improving public health and safety, contributing to economic vitality, and enhancing the quality of life of every community of the United States is in the interest of the residents and those who visit our community. NOW, THEREFORE, I, Shepard M. Harris, Mayor of the City of Golden Valley, do hereby proclaim the week of May 17 through 23, 2015 as "NATIONAL PUBLIC WORKS WEEK" in the City of Golden Valley, and I call upon all citizens and civic organizations to acquaint themselves with the issues involved in providing our public works and to recognize the contributions which public works officials make every day to our health, safety, comfort, and quality of life. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the great seal of the City of Golden Valley to be affixed this 21St day of April 2015. Shepard M. Harris, Mayor CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY MINNESOTA PROCLAMATION FOR FIBROMYALGIA AWARENESS DAY MAY 12, 2015 WHEREAS, the City of Golden Valley joins institutions around the world in recognizing May 12, 2015, as "Fibromyalgia Awareness Day," and WHEREAS, fibromyalgia is a complex chronic pain illness affecting over ten million people in the United States (2-6 percent of the population), and WHEREAS, it may take years to be diagnosed with fibromyalgia, and family members are 8 times more likely to also be diagnosed; and WHEREAS, fibromyalgia is shown to affect the central nervous system and has no known cure, early diagnosis and treatment can reduce disability (15-20% of patients are on long-term disability) and symptoms of widespread body pain, extreme fatigue, sleep disorders, stiffness and weakness, headaches, numbness and tingling, impairment of memory and concentration, and co-existing conditions such as IBS, TMJD, migraine, environmental sensitivities, anxiety and depression; and WHEREAS, increased awareness and understanding by the public, healthcare providers, and policymakers of the daily multifaceted management challenges of fibromyalgia and its impact on patients' function and quality of life may reduce the stigma of this illness; and WHEREAS people with fibromyalgia have a right to be treated with dignity and a right to pain relief; WHEREAS the National Fibromyalgia & Chronic Pain Association, a nonprofit 501c3 charitable organization; members of its Leaders Against Pain Action Network: and City of Golden Valley have joined together to advocate for fibromyalgia awareness, support, and a better future through research, diagnosis, education, and treatment; and BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Golden Valley does hereby proclaim the May 12, 2015: "FIBROMYALGIA AWARENESS DAY" Across the City of Golden Valley, and I urge all citizens to support the search for a cure and assist those individuals and families who deal with this devastating illness on a daily basis. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the great seal of the City of Golden Valley to be affixed this 21St day of April 2015. Shepard M. Harris, Mayor r . .� MEMORANDUM valley Physical Development Department 763-593-8095/763-593-8109 (fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting April 21, 2015 Agenda Item 3. M. Bottineau LRT Business Advisory Council Appointment Prepared By Marc Nevinski, Physical Development Director Summary The Bottineau LRT project office has established two advisory committees to provide additional community input into the planning of the line. Communities along the line are able to make two appointments to each committee. The Council has appointed two members to the Community Advisory Committee (Rich Baker and Gillian Rosenquist) and one member to the Business Advisory Committee (Alison Pence, Courage-Kinney). Golden Valley currently has one open seat on the BAC. Staff contacted Mr. Ben Colglazier, Promethean Consulting, regarding the BAC and he is interested in serving on the committee. Mr. Colglazier both lives and works in Golden Valley. He is a member of the Twin West Chamber, and active in its Golden Valley Business Advisory Council. It should be noted that Twin West Chamber also has an appointment to the BAC, and is represented by Liberty Diversified, located in Golden Valley. Recommended Action Motion to appoint Mr. Ben Colglazier to the Bottineau LRT Business Advisory Committee. r� city 0 golden �1'#"M'* ORA NDUM valley Physical Development Department 763-593-8095/763-593-8109(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting April 21, 2015 Agenda Item 4. A. Public Hearing- Ordinance#553 -Amending Section 11.70 Reducing Hotel Minimum Parking Requirement Prepared By Emily Goellner, Associate Planner/Grant Writer Summary The current minimum parking regulation for hotels in Golden Valley requires at least 1.5 parking spaces per unit plus parking for other uses (typically offices or a restaurant). Per the Planning Commission discussion on March 9, 2015, and approval on March 23, staff is recommending that the minimum parking requirement be reduced to 1 parking space per unit plus parking for other uses. Hotels are permitted in the Commercial and Industrial Zoning Districts. They are also permitted in the 1-394 Mixed Use Zoning District within a mixed use building. Hotels are a conditional use in the 1-394 Mixed Use Zoning District when located in a free standing building. Currently, there are two hotels located in Golden Valley. The Super 8 is located at 6300 Wayzata Boulevard and the Holiday Inn is located at 6051 Golden Hills Drive. Both are located in the 1-394 Mixed Use Zoning District as free standing buildings. Representatives of Super 8 approached City staff with interest in expanding the hotel to include additional rooms. However, the proposed addition would require more parking spaces than the property can accommodate. Representatives of Super 8 requested that the City explore the possibility of reducing the minimum parking requirement for hotels. For staff's reference, representatives provided a summary of parking requirements in surrounding municipalities (attached) and a summary of results from parking counts completed on the Super 8 property in summer of 2014 (attached). Attachments • Planning Commission Minutes, dated March 23, 2015 (2 pages) • Memo to Planning Commission, dated March 23, 2015 (2 pages) • Underlined/Overstruck Zoning Code Language (1 page) • Summary of Parking Requirements for Surrounding Jurisdictions (1 page) • Registered Vehicles for Guests Staying at the Super 8 in Golden Valley (1 page) • Ordinance #553, Amending Section 11.70 Reducing Hotel Minimum Parking Requirement. (1 page) Recommended Action Motion to adopt Ordinance #553, Amending Section 11.70 Reducing Hotel Minimum Parking Requirement. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission March 23, 2015 Page 6 Conditions: The plans prepared by Loucks As ociates, submitted on March 20, 2015, shall ome a part of this approval. 2. The ommendations and requi ments outlined in the memo rr' the City Enginee the Planning Manag r, dated March 13, 201, all become a part of this approva 3. The recommen\ ns and requii aments outline-1n the memo from the Fire Chief to the Planning Man r, dated arch 20 2-e, , shall become a part of this approval. 4. All signage must meet the req �is of the City's Sign Code (Section 4.20). 5. A park dedication fee of $72,5 y ° of the and market value) shall be paid prior to approval of the Final Pla �� 6. The Final Plat shall incl e "P U. . No. 1 ":in its title. 7. The applicant shall ress scre ning and lanfraping to describe views by pedestrians, bik- and car pas ' ngers includingl6nderings. 8. The applicati will be subject t design review and ap al that would include elevation aterials, and gener °I renderings. 9. Bicycl ` acks shall be provided. 10. Th' approval is subject to all of r state, federal, and local ordinanc gulations, or laws with authori over this development. 3. Informal Public Hearing —Zoning Code Text Amendment— Hotel Parking Requirements — ZO00-97 Applicant: City of Golden Valley Purpose: To consider amending language in the Zoning Code regarding hotel parking requirements. Goellner reminded the Commission that at their last meeting they discussed amending the Zoning Code language regarding hotel parking. She explained that the current number of required parking spaces for a hotel use is 1.5 spaces per unit plus parking for other uses. She reviewed several other cities requirements and said staff is recommending the parking requirement be changed to 1 parking space per unit plus parking for other uses. Segelbaum asked if other cities address what they feel is appropriate parking for banquet space. Goellner said not many cities she researched addressed banquet parking. Zimmerman added that Golden Valley's Code requires 1 space per 3 seats for convention and exhibition halls. Segelbaum suggested hotel banquet space be added to the convention and exhibition hall language because he is concerned that someone might take advantage if there are no requirements regarding banquet spaces. Waldhauser suggested that the language be changed to say event spaces. Kluchka opened the public hearing. Seeing and hearing no one wishing to comment, Kluchka closed the public hearing. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission March 23, 2015 Page 7 Blum said the language staff is recommending seems reasonable and consistent with what other communities are doing and it will give the Super 8 Hotel an opportunity to expand. Cera suggested reviewing a couple different areas of the parking language regarding events, banquets, and restaurants. Zimmerman said staff will review the language pertaining to those uses. Kluchka said he feels comfortable with the proposed change for hotel parking. Waldhauser said the expectation is if there is another use, staff would just figure out which parking requirements are compatible, so she doesn't have an issue with leaving the "other uses" language in the hotel parking requirements. Segelbaum said it is fine to use staff discretion but banquets and events are uses that can be anticipated so he'd like the language to be more clear in this case. Zimmerman stated that the Planning Commission could just consider the proposed change to the hotel parking and staff could bring back additional information regarding other uses, or staff could review other uses and discuss them when this item goes to the City Council for consideration. Segelbaum said he is comfortable with the item going to the City Council, but if there are widely different numbers in staff's review it may be worth bringing the item back to Planning Commission. MOVED by Cera, seconded by Kluchka and motion carried unanimously to recommend amending the Zoning Code regarding hotel parking requirements to 1 space per unit plus parking for other uses. Informal Public Hearing — ning Code Text Amendment— Single Family Residential Height and Sid Setbacks —ZO00-98 A 'cant: City of Golden alley Purpose: To consider a ending language in oning Code regarding ilding heigh ; side setbacks, side wall articulation re ' ements. I y Zimmerman explained that in t ity studied infill development including height, massing, setbacks, etc. He remi ""d the Commissioners that they discussed the interpretation of the Zoning e „h es made as a result of the 2006 study at their last meeting and staff now h a clew r un s standing of what was intended. He stated that the Planning Commi ion conse ' us was t height was to be measured at one spot at the street frontag oth side set cks would i ease the same amount according to that one front mea rement, and that his was intend e or new construction. He stated that what has b , n happening since 006 was a tiered ( ing cake) setback for both new constru n and remodels. He plained that one option to grandfather in existing hom and move forward with t interpretation as intende , or another option is to C ge the Zoning Code langua e to match how staff has been interpreting the Code C: t 0f ""v Iley Physical Development Department 763-593-8095/763-593-8109(fax) Date: March 23, 2015 To: Golden Valley Planning Commission From: Emily Goellner, Associate Planner/Grant Writer Subject: Informal Public Hearing—ZO00-99- Zoning Code Text Amendment—Reduce Hotel Minimum Parking Requirement Summary The City Manager has directed Staff to examine the Zoning Code in relation to minimum parking requirements for hotel uses to determine if the existing minimum should be reduced. The current regulation requires 1.5 parking spaces per unit plus parking for other uses (typically offices or a restaurant). Per the Planning Commission discussion on March 9, 2015, staff is recommending that the minimum parking requirement be reduced to 1 parking space per unit plus parking for other uses. Hotels are permitted in the Commercial and Industrial Zoning Districts. They are also permitted in the 1-394 Mixed Use Zoning District within a mixed use building. Hotels are a conditional use in the 1-394 Mixed Use Zoning District when located in a free standing building. Currently, there are two hotels located in Golden Valley. The Super 8 is located at 6300 Wayzata Boulevard and the Holiday Inn is located at 6051 Golden Hills Drive. Both are located in the 1-394 Mixed Use Zoning District as free standing buildings. Representatives of Super 8 approached City staff with interest in expanding the hotel to include additional rooms. However, the proposed addition would require more parking spaces than the property can accommodate. Representatives of Super 8 requested that the City explore the possibility of reducing the minimum parking requirement for hotels. For staff's reference, representatives provided a summary of parking requirements in surrounding municipalities (attached) and a summary of results from parking counts completed on the Super 8 property in summer of 2014 (attached). Recommendation Staff recommends amending section 11.70 of the Zoning Code, Subdivision 3, for hotel uses, to require a minimum of 1 parking space per unit plus parking for other uses. Attachments Unapproved Planning Commission Minutes, dated March 9, 2015 (1 page) Memo to Planning Commission, dated March 9, 2015 (1 page) Underlined/Overstruck Zoning Code Language (1 page) Summary of Parking Requirements for Surrounding Jurisdictions (1 page) Registered Vehicles for Guests Staying at the Super 8 in Golden Valley (1 page) Off-Street Parking and Loading Regulations - § 11.70 COMMERCIAL cont. 1 space per 5 students based on design Trade and Training School capability Source: Ordinance No. 482, 2nd Series Effective Date: 4-27-12 1 space per 25 s.f. of customer area. Bakery Source: Ordinance No. 346, 2nd Series Effective Date: 7-1-06 1 space per 3.5 seats Clubs/Lodges Source: Ordinance No. 482, 2nd Series Effective Date: 4-27-12 Convention/Exhibition Hall 1 space per 3 seats Hotel or Motel 4—.5 1 spaces per unit plus parking for other uses. Places of Lodging See Hotel Service Station Motor Fuel Station 8 spaces plus 4 per service stall. Motor Vehicle Service Repair 4 spaces for each service bay. Offices 1 space per 250 s.f. of gross floor area. Mortuaries 1 per every 250 s.f. plus 1 space for ever 5 seats. Car Wash 8 spaces plus 4 per service stall. Medical Clinic Offices 1 space per 200 s.f. of gross floor area Open Sales or Rental Lots 1 space per 2000 s.f. of display area Printing 1 space per each 100 s.f. of customer service area. Bowling Alley 1 space per each 6 seats or 300 s.f. of gross floor area, whichever is greater. Pool Hall/Arcade 1 space per 50 s.f. 1 space per each 6 seats or 300 s.f. of Skating Rinks gross floor area of rink area, whichever is greater. 1 space for every 200 s.f. of gross floor Sport & Health Clubs area of non-court area plus 2 spaces for each court plus 1 per 50 s.f. deck area for swimming. Theater and/or Gymnasiums (Auditorium) 1 space per 4 seats or 1 space per 400 s.f., whichever is greater. Restaurant Class I Traditional-No Liquor) 1 space per 100 s.f. of gross floor area Restaurant - Class II (Fast Food) 1 space per 40 s.f. of gross floor area Restaurant -Class III (Restaurant W/ Liquor) 1 space per 60 s.f. of floor area plus 1 space per 25 s.f. of bar area. Retail Store or Service Establishment 1 space per 250 s.f. of gross floor area Shopping Center 1 space for every 200 s.f. of gross floor pp g area. 5 spaces per 1000 s.f. Summary of Parkins requirements for surrounding Jurisdictions, • Maple Grove, Minnesota o One space per each rental unit, plus one space per each ten units, and one space for each employee on any shift. 0 1:1.1 parking ratio * This would require our proposed property to have 140 stalls + 14 stalls +3 stalls = Total of 157 parking stalls • Plymouth, Minnesota o One space per sleeping unit, plus one space per day shift employee 0 1:1 parking ratio o This would require our proposed property to have 140 stalls +3 stalls = Total of 143 parking stalls • Minnetonka, Minnesota o One space per room and One space per employee during major business hours. (per Susan with the city) v 1:1 parking ratio o This would require our proposed property to have 140 stalls +3 stalls -- Total Total of 143 parking stalls • Bloomington, Minnesota o Parking Space per unit(per Denis with the city) 0 1:1 parking ratio o This would require our proposed property to have 140 stalls _ Total of 140 parking stalls • Wayzata, Minnesota 0 1 space per lodging unit plus spaces equal to 25% of the capacity of any club or lodges. 0 1:1 parking ratio o This would require our proposed property to have 140 stalls = Total of 140 parking stalls • Eden Prairie, Minnesota 0 1:1 o Have also re-written their ordinance for certain areas of the city called town center. Registered Vehicles for Guests Staying at the Super 8 in Golden Valley. This is based on the dates with the highest occupancy for the summer of 2014.This shows that the hotel is not currently utilizing the amount of parking that they currently have, and that a ratio of 1 guest room to 1 parking stall would be sufficient for the proposed remodel of the property. • 6/4- 72 registered vehicles, 99% occupancy • 6/11 - 73 registered vehicles, 99%occupancy • 6/23 - 81 registered vehicles, 97%occupancy • 7/12 - 82 registered vehicles, 100 occupancy • 7/21 - 77 registered vehicles , 99%occupancy • 7/24 - 75 registered vehicles, 99%occupancy • 8/2 - 84 registered vehicles, 98% occupancy • 8/12 - 69 registered vehicles, 97%occupancy 8/22 - 72 registered vehicles, 100%occupancy • 8/25 - 68 registered vehicles, 97% occupancy ORDINANCE NO. 533, 2ND SERIES AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE Amending Section 11.70: Off-Street Parking and Loading Regulations, Regarding Hotel Parking Requirements The City Council for the City of Golden Valley hereby ordains as follows: Section 1. City Code Section 11.70, Subdivision 3 (Hotel or Motel) is amended to read as follows: 1 space per unit plus parking for other uses. Section 2. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99 entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 3. This Ordinance shall take effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law. Adopted by the City Council this 21st day of April, 2015. /s/Shepard M. Harris Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: /s/Kristine A. Luedke Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk , tv of �� J� �� -� �~� ��golde' n valley — h~ s--a- Development Department 763-593'8095/763-593-8189(fmx) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting April 21, 2015 60 day deadline: April 21, 2Q15 Agenda Item 4. B. Public Hearing- Preliminary PUD Plan for CenterPoint Energy PUD No. 122 - 6161 Golden Valley Road - CenterPointEnergy, Applicant Prepared By Emily Goe||ner, Associate P|anne'/GrantVVriter Summary CenterPoint Energy is seeking approval of a Planning Unit Development (PUD) Permit to construct a 2'otoryoperations facility and to replace the gas regulator building on the 13.9-acre site at the southeast corner of Golden Valley Road and Douglas Drive (County Road 102). The property at 6161 Golden Valley Road currently contains five buildings owned and operated by CenterPoint Energy for gas utility operations. The five existing buildings are used for the peak shaving boiler, peak shaving vapor, gas regulator, research and a control shed for a radio tower, Approval of the proposed PUD would allow the applicant to have more than one principal structure and one accessory structure on asing|e lot, which isnot permitted in the Industrial Zoning District, When the property was originally developed, this policy was not yet adopted into the Zoning Code. The proposed 2-story operation facility is 64,000 square feet and would employ 60-70 additional employees on the site. Within the building, 20,620 square feet would be designated office space, 39,780 square feet for warehouse, and 3,600 square feet for a metal shop. The building would be used by employees during regular business hours with the exception of emergencies. The proposed operation facility is an L-shaped building that would be built in the northwest portion of the site near the corner of Douglas Drive and Golden Valley Road. The applicant has placed the building onthe site to meet the setback requirements ofthe Industrial Zoning District. A landscaped buffer is planned within those setbacks, The gas regulator building will be demolished and rebuilt in its current location off of the driveway access to Golden Valley Road, The 1-story building will be 025 square feet in size. The applicant plans to demolish the radio tower control shed and there are noplans torebuild the structure atthis time. The property is guided for Industrial use in the Comprehensive Plan and is zoned for Industrial use. The current uses located on the property are essential services, which are permitted in the Industrial zone. The proposed uses, which include office, warehouse, and essential services, are also permitted in the Industrial zone. The proposal is consistent with the intent and purpose of the Comprehensive Plan and the Industrial Zoning District. Plans for this proposal were reviewed by the City's Engineering Division. A memorandum that addresses site access, drainage and utility easements, sanitary sewer, water services, grading, stormwater management, landscaping, and tree preservation is attached. Staff in the Engineering Division recommend approval of the preliminary plan, but have instructed the applicant to explore several issues during this entitlement process. These issues relate to driveway location, pedestrian facilities, vacation of a watermain easement, final plat requirements, pretreatment of discharge, and specific landscaping requirements. The Fire Department reviewed this proposal to ensure that buildings and services are equipped with fire protection systems and that adequate emergency vehicle access is achieved on the site. In the attached memorandum, the Fire Chief outlines four pieces of additional information that are required from the applicant. Attachments • Location Map (1 page) • Applicant's Narrative (5 pages) • Planning Commission Minutes dated March 23, 2015 (6 pages) • Memo to the Planning Commission dated March 23, 2015 (4 pages) • Memo from the Engineering Division dated March 13, 2015 (6 pages) • Memo from the Fire Department dated March 20, 2015 (3 pages) • Letter from Judith Moll dated March 17, 2015 (1 page) • Site Plans (24 pages) Recommended Action Motion to recommend approval of the Preliminary Plan for CenterPoint Energy PUD No. 122, subject to the following conditions: 1. The plans prepared by Loucks Associates, submitted on March 20, 2015, shall become a part of this approval. 2. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the City Engineer to the Planning Manager, dated March 13, 2015, shall become a part of this approval. 3. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Fire Chief to the Planning Manager, dated March 20, 2015, shall become a part of this approval. 4. All signage must meet the requirements of the City's Sign Code (Section 4.20). 5. A park dedication fee of$68,135.52 (2% of the land market value) shall be paid prior to approval of the Final Plat. 6. The Final Plat shall include "P.U.D. No. 122" in its title. 7. This approval is subject to all other state, federal, and local ordinances, regulations, or laws with authority over this development. In addition, the Council makes the following findings pursuant to City Code Section 11.55, Subd. 5(e): 1. Quality Site Planning. The PUD plan is tailored to the specific characteristics of the site and achieves a higher quality of site planning and design than generally expected under conventional provisions of the ordinance. This PUD will allow the applicant to better utilize the site by developing the operations facility on the site. 2. Preservation. The PUD plan preserves and protects substantial desirable portions of the site's characteristics, open space and sensitive environmental features including steep slopes, trees, scenic views, creeks, wetlands, and open waters. The plan will utilize the perimeter of the site for tree plantings and stormwater management. 3. Efficient— Effective. The PUD plan includes efficient and effective use (which includes preservation) of the land. The plan brings more active uses to this large site by providing office and warehouse uses, which are compatible with the current uses on the property. 4. Compatibility. The PUD Plan results in development compatible with adjacent uses and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and redevelopment plans and goals. The proposed uses are permitted in the Industrial Zoning District. 5. General Health. The PUD plan is consistent with preserving and improving the general health, safety and general welfare of the people of the City. 6. Meets Requirements. The PUD plan meets the PUD Intent and Purpose provision and all other PUD ordinance provisions. With exception of the issues raised by the Fire Chief, the plan generally meets the requirements. 1310 1333 213" 304 1 61866160 �'" 1310 1317 1317 319 61' 12 '^`^^r°2 6620—6600 65141309 1320 f 318 6192 6154 605C6624 I=) 5920 i ! 1318 1315 i � C� c� 6150 fi0'---1-1172 ` 0 605G0181315 6194- 1L6152 1 '206146 !)• 6014I,'po Plymouth nct )WI 6058;C . _6016'- >% • -621 r A il1300 'dA 6148IU1J '6004012 , 6102ll...: �4 6601 6515 O� 6002 =6062 0 6000 JJ 1210— 'x.,507 6100 • 6500 6436 6-424,6400 3336 6316�Of6300 1200 19102305 107 • z 6522 6508 + k11801 201101104106 1.50 11� • J Phoenix 5t 1170 �- 6200 106 1C Q 6620 -6431 6419 6405 6319 1 1123 , wi �)It�717 tiZ> "° I6300 y� �Subject Property 1136 6306 6320 4 1126 6400 11•1 4 f _ ^641`4 01101 O 642 432 .,� /•~�• ;�' 65086504 �� 1109 r(514 • 66118 6620 6161 • 6533'' 65331�01 ; �r 1111 /-! 204 304 • � 1 6 543 653 5101, h 3701 31,30 641 306537. 303 2bd3 6539 --1107 925 304 301 304 304 303 z • 925 d .. y<, ^• - .. ' frc;_•;y 6190 •618 i 6186• •6184 ,•_ "� '- 6182.6180 - - • 1 6178 615861565-1%6 X76 • e6172 M gm_m' L .� Application for Preliminary PUD ' Ftp 2015 CenterPoint Energy 6161 Golden Valley Road Golden Valley, MN February 20, 2015 Project Overview CenterPoint Energy("CenterPoint") requests approval of a planned unit development plan to allow redevelopment of our existing property at 6161 Golden Valley Road. CenterPoint has owned and operated the existing property for regional gas utility operations since the 1950's. CenterPoint will continue to own, operate and manage the property with the addition of the new facility as part of its regional gas utility operations. The project consists of new construction of an approximately 64,000 sq.ft. operations facility and an approximately 825 square foot gas regulator building, and related site improvements. The site improvements include reconfiguration of the property boundaries to accommodate proposed public improvements to the intersection of Golden Valley Road and Douglas Drive North. The new operations facility and gas regulator building will replace two of five buildings that exist on the site as of the date of this application. CenterPoint is seeking approval of its project as a planned unit development in order to allow for more than one principal structure and one accessory structure on the site. The site consists of 13.88 acres at the southeast quadrant of Douglas Drive and Golden Valley Road. Current improvements on the site consist of essential service gas utility operational functions including a regulator building, research building, peak shaving boiler building, peak shaving vapor building and radio tower control building. The proposed new operations facility will house CenterPoint operational functions including purchasing,warehouse, Home Service Plus sales and installation, meter department and all related administrative and support functions. The property is located in an Industrial zoning district. The current and proposed uses of the property for Class I and Class III Essential Services, including associated office and technical facilities, are permitted uses with the zoning district. The purpose of the PUD is to allow the new facility to be constructed and allow the existing essential structures to remain in place as lawful conforming uses. Zoning code amendments adopted since the original development of property no longer allow more than one principal structure and one accessory structure to be constructed on a single lot. Project Background CenterPoint is implementing a series of corporate real estate projects that support a strategy for overall improvements to service effectiveness and delivery in the metropolitan area. CenterPoint has evaluated alternative sites in the northwest suburban Twin Cities area in which to locate the project. CenterPoint prefers co-locate the new operations center with its existing Golden Valley facilities to make efficient use of property it already owns and to combine operational functions, provided CenterPoint can obtain timely approvals and permits to construct the project from the City of Golden Valley. To achieve its goals, CenterPoint must obtain approval of the project in early 2015, in order to substantially complete and occupy the facility in early 2016. CenterPoint Energy—Application for Preliminary PUD Page 1 At completion,the project will represent nearly$12 million in new private investment into building construction, furnishings,fixtures and equipment. The facility will employ 60-70 new additional full-time employees in the municipality in which the project locates. The project is anticipated to generate in excess of$150,000- $200,000.00 per year in additional new property taxes. The company's design/build contractor has completed the design to a level sufficient to make building permit application within the next 30-45 days. The remaining constraint to the company's final decision to proceed with the site is the City's request of the project to seek planned unit development approval in order to proceed. While the proposed new facility has been designed to comply with underlying zoning requirements,the necessity to maintain the existing structures on the site as functions essential to the gas utility operation has prompted the PUD request. The project has been designed to function within existing site constraints, including railroad right-of-way on its east and south borders and the City's desire to acquire nearly one acre of the subject property on the north portion of the parcel for the Golden Valley Road/Douglas Drive roundabout and related road and infrastructure improvements including the relocation of gas main lines. As such, CenterPoint has been in discussion with the City's public works department on right-of-way coordination and potential solutions to address impacts to CenterPoint's use of the property. PUD Purpose and Intent The proposed CenterPoint redevelopment complies with the intent and purpose of the Golden Valley PUD ordinance as stated in Code Section 11.55, subdivision 1,A, as follows: 1. Encourage, preserve and improve the health,safety and general welfare of the people of the City by encouraging the use of contemporary land planning principles. CenterPoint is a regional natural gas utility provider and as such, focuses its daily functions on the provision of safe and reliable energy resources to the residents of Golden Valley. The company has owned and operated the site since the 1950's. The proposed project allows CenterPoint to continue and enhance its operational capabilities and remain a relevant and present corporate stakeholder in the City of Golden Valley. Approval of the planned unit development will bring new jobs into the City of Golden Valley,allow for more efficient use of the existing property,and provide for redevelopment of the site to meet contemporary storm water management principles. The site and building will be constructed in accordance with the standards for LEED Silver Certification through the United States Green Building Council (USGBC), which standards are consistent with improved health and general welfare of the people of the City. 2. Achieve a high quality of site planning,design, landscaping, and building materials which are compatible with the existing and planned land uses. The project design team has taken great care to design the site and building plan to be functionally relevant, aesthetically attractive and provide a natural "buffer"to interior site functions that are more industrial in nature by positioning the building on the street edge. Added landscape enhancements will create a defined character to the site. Access points on both the north side and west side of the building will allow for efficient and safe vehicle movement. Building materials and design features are of the highest quality for the industrial nature of the project. New ponds at the north end of the site will provide storm water management and an attractive landscaped buffer. CenterPoint Energy—Application for Preliminary PUD Page 2 3. Encourage preservation and protection of desirable site characteristics and open space and protection of sensitive environmental features including steep slopes,trees,scenic views,waterways,wetlands and lakes. The site is relatively flat with minimal landscape improvements. The site plan incorporates enhanced storm water retention capabilities along with robust landscaping treatments that will be attractive and environmentally pleasing. In furthering its environmental goals and objectives, CenterPoint will seek LEED Silver Certification of the building through the United States Green Building Council (USGBC). 4. Encourage construction of affordable housing and a variety of housing types. N/A S. Encourage creativity and flexibility in land development. The City Staff recommended pursuing the project as a PUD in order to provide the flexibility necessary to accommodate the existing essential services structures and the proposed new structures on a single lot. The PUD will allow CenterPoint to make efficient use of its existing facilities and personnel, rather than establish new, partially redundant,facilities in a new location. 6. Encourage efficient and effective use of land,open space,streets, utilities and other public facilities. The PUD will allow for a highly efficient and effective use of land by allowing multiple related components of a single corporate operation of CenterPoint to locate on one site. The existing parcel will remain underutilized and under-developed without a PUD. The project will make use of existing major collector roadways and utility connections. By allowing CenterPoint to develop the new operations facility at this site,the City will allow CenterPoint to use existing infrastructure, rather than developing a new site that may require new or expanded infrastructure. An integral component of the site plan is the accommodation of approximately one acre of land on the north portion of the property for the Douglas Drive/Golden Valley Road roundabout project. CenterPoint has continued to work diligently with city staff to incorporate the City's proposal into its planning efforts. 7. Allow mixing land uses and assembly and development of land to form larger parcels. One of the goals of the PUD ordinance is to allow flexibility and the mixing of land uses and buildings within a single lot. The new operations facility will add office and warehouse functions to a site that has historically been occupied primarily by essential service structures with low occupancy and few active uses. The inclusion of the proposed building allows increased use of the property while ensuring that the property functions adequately for existing and proposed uses. 8. Encourage development in transitional areas which achieve compatibility with all adjacent and nearby land uses. The property is zoned and guided industrial as are the properties to the south. Property to the east is zoned and guided Light Industrial while the property to the west is zoned and guided Commercial or Office.The CenterPoint Energy—Application for Preliminary PUD Page 3 proposed new office and warehouse building will be compatible with all surrounding land uses within this planned industrial area. The PUD will allow intensification of the existing compatible uses, and provide an alternative to spreading those uses out into other parts of the City or the region. 9. Achieve development consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The property is guided and zoned for industrial uses.The Comprehensive Plan defines this land use category to include warehouse, storage, light manufacturing, office, rail and similar uses.The proposed office/warehouse building is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The PUD will allow for more intense use of existing developed land, which is also consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 10. Achieve development consistent with the City's redevelopment plans and goals. The Comprehensive plan identifies several goals for redevelopment. The proposed development meets these goals by providing new development that is compatible with existing development in the surrounding area and with the city's land use plan, provides sustainable development and increased tax base and job opportunities. 11. Encourage development that is sustainable and has a high degree of energy efficiency. As a regional utility provider, CenterPoint is committed to being a leader in sustainability and energy efficiency. As such and in furthering its environmental goals and objectives, CenterPoint will seek LEED Silver Certification of the building through the United States Green Building Council (USGBC). The PUD will also serve a fundamental goal of sustainable development by allowing and redevelopment of an existing site at a higher density. Proposed Findings Accordingly, CenterPoint asks the Planning Commission to recommend and the City Council to adopt the following findings, pursuant to Code Section 11.55 Subdivision 5.E: 1. Quality Site Planning. The PUD plan is tailored to the specific characteristics of the site and achieves a higher quality of site planning and design than generally expected under conventional provisions of the ordinance. The PUD plan is tailored to existing site conditions. Specifically, CenterPoint has configured its new operations building to screen its fleet parking, outdoor storage yard and above ground tanks from view from Golden Valley Road and Douglas Avenue North and is using its stormwater detention ponds as landscape features that will provide further screening and an attractive entrance to the site. The PUD plan allows CenterPoint to achieve a higher quality of site planning and design by developing the site, with 5 separate buildings piping and storage facilities, as a unified campus. If not for the PUD plan, CenterPoint would have to spread its facilities across several separate lots, each without the opportunity to use the buildings and stormwater detention ponds to screen the more industrial elements of the facility. CenterPoint Energy—Application for Preliminary PUD Page 4 2. Preservation. The PUD plan preserves and protects substantial desirable portions of the site's characteristics, open space and sensitive environmental features including steep slopes, trees, scenic views, creeks, wetlands and open waters. Although the proposed redevelopment will replace existing open space with new construction, the site has been an industrial site bordered by railroads and arteries for decades, and there are no existing "substantial desirable portions of the site's characteristics to preserve. Instead, the PUD plan will all for denser development of an existing industrial site, rather than spreading the industrial development to other sites. Further, the PUD plan will use natural features for stormwater detention in a manner that will create a more desirable environment along the perimeter of the site. 3. Efficient - Effective. The PUD plan includes efficient and effective use (which includes preservation) of the land. The PUD consolidates office and industrial functions for more efficient and effective use of the existing industrial site. 4. Compatibility. The PUD Plan results in development compatible with adjacent uses and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and redevelopment plans and goals. The proposed development is compatible with adjacent railroad and industrial uses adjacent to the property. The configuration of the new operations center building and the location of the stormwater detention ponds also provide a transition to the residential uses north and west of the site. The property is guided and zoned for industrial uses, including warehouse, storage, light manufacturing, office, rail and similar uses.The proposed office/warehouse building is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The PUD will allow for more intense use of existing developed land,which is also consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. S. General Health. The PUD plan is consistent with preserving and improving the general health, safety and general welfare of the people of the City. The PUD will be developed in accordance with the standards for LEED Silver Certification through the United States Green Building Council (USGBC),which standards are consistent with improved health and general welfare of the people of the City. 6. Meets Requirements.The PUD plan meets the PUD Intent and Purpose provision and all other PUD ordinance provisions. See PUD Purpose and Intent section above. CenterPoint Energy—Application for Preliminary PUD Page 5 Regular Meeting of the Golden Valley Planning Commission March 23, 2015 egular meeting of the Planning Co mission was held at the Golden Valley City Hall, Co it Chambers, 7800 Golden Val y Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota, on Monday, March 2015. Chair Kluchka calle the meeting to order at 7 pm. Those present Planning Comm sioners Blum, Cera,-=Kfuchka, Segelbaum, and Waldhauser. Also pr t was Plann g Manager Jason Zimmerman, Associate Planner/Grant Writer Emir oellner, nd Administrative Assistant Lisa Wittman. Commissioners Baker and Joha n re-absent. 1. Approval of Minutes�Rl February 9,. Joint City C'` uncil and Plan Commission Meeting March 015, Regular Planni g Commission Mee MOV by Waldhauser, seconded Cera and motion carried unanr usly to approve t ebruary 9, 2015, and the Marc 9, 2015, minutes as submitted. 2. Informal Public Hearing — Preliminary PUD Plan — CenterPoint Energy — 6161 Golden Valley Road — PU-122 Applicant: CenterPoint Energy Address: 6161 Golden Valley Road Purpose: To allow a new approximately 64,000 square foot operations facility, replacement of an approximately 825 square foot gas regulator building, and related site improvements. Goellner referred to a site plan and explained the applicant's request for a PUD to add an additional principal structure. The proposed new structure is a 64,000 square foot operations facility which includes office, warehouse, and small metal shop. The applicant is also proposing to replace a gas regulator building. Goellner stated that Douglas Drive is being reconstructed in 2016-2017 and noted that the placement of the building and setbacks are shown on applicant's plans using the proposed new property lines. She referred to the parking on the site and stated that the City Code requires approximately 80 parking spaces and that the applicant is providing 208 spaces. She stated that the applicant is encouraged to add a sidewalk connecting their office to the proposed sidewalk along Douglas Drive. She referred to the site plan and discussed stormwater management and landscaping. She explained that the current pond on the site will be filled in, and a new pond will be constructed. The applicant is also proposing to remove 65 trees and to plant 132 new trees and has been directed to include shrub and perennial plantings as well. She stated that staff is recommending approval of the Preliminary PUD plan subject to the conditions listed in the staff report. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission March 23, 2015 Page 2 Segelbaum asked if there are any additional requirements that the applicant is required to meet due to the reconstruction of Douglas Drive. Goellner said no and added that the sidewalk along Douglas Drive will be provided with the reconstruction project. Kluchka asked Goellner to highlight where the sidewalk on Douglas Drive will be located and comment on if it is guaranteed to be built. Goellner referred to the site plan and showed where the proposed sidewalks will be located along Douglas Drive. Kluchka asked if that sidewalk will connect to the sidewalk on Golden Valley Road. Goellner said she believes it will. Waldhauser referred to the proposed number of parking spaces and asked why the additional parking is needed. Goellner said she thinks the number of spaces proposed fits with the number of employees on site. Segelbaum noted that the plans shown in the presentation show the driveways on Douglas Drive in alignment, but they were not aligned on the plans in the agenda packet. Waldhauser clarified that the driveway alignment issue is on Golden Valley Road, not Douglas Drive. Zimmerman added that Tennant currently has two driveways that will be consolidated and re-aligned with the reconstruction of the Douglas Drive/Golden Valley Road intersection. Blum asked if the applicant is regulating the inflow and outflow of gas at this facility. Goellner said yes. Blum asked if the proposed new facility will also be for that purpose or just for office purposes. Blum also asked if there are any environmental or safety considerations for increased capacity in the outflow of gas, or if that has a relationship to where the new facility is located on the property. Goellner said the applicant could help answer those questions. Segelbaum asked if the City has any record of there being any safety incidents at this location. Zimmerman said the Fire Department has had discussions about the appropriate fire suppression system and standards for the tank farm. Ross Hedlund, Frauenshuh Commercial, Representing the Applicant, said they are very excited about this project on an underutilized piece of property on Golden Valley. He said they have representatives in attendance from OPUS, Loucks, and CenterPoint to answer questions. Dave Long, Facilities Project Manager for Gas Operations, CenterPoint Energy, addressed the questions about the parking. He said they will have approximately 70 employees coming from other facilities who all have fleet vehicles. They will arrive in their personal vehicles and then take the fleet vehicles out for the day and come back. He said there will also be a number of other employees at this site. Waldhauser asked if the fleet vehicles are rotating in and out, or if they all arrive and leave at once. Long stated that they will leave the site between 6-8 am and will arrive back between 2:30-4 pm. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission March 23, 2015 Page 3 Vicki VanDell, Loucks Associates, Representing the Applicant, referred to the questions regarding the sidewalks and stated that they could put in a sidewalk connection from the proposed new building to Douglas Drive and another connection to Golden Valley Road. Kluchka asked about the traffic patterns on the site. VanDell referred to a site plan and explained that the Golden Valley Road entrance is mostly used by office staff. The Douglas Drive entrance is mostly used by operations, warehouse, and research staff. Long added that the Douglas Drive entrance will be used by construction and maintenance trucks and trucks delivering to the warehouse. Dan Young Dixon, OPUS Architects and Engineers, referred to a site plan and noted that the large open area in the center of the site is storage for piping used for installations. Kluchka asked if that open area will be paved. VanDell said it will be paved. KILtchka asked if that area would be screened. Dixon stated that the building will screen the open area, and that there is already a berm and fencing around the site and the tanks. Segelbaum said he would like to hear more about the overall screening for the whole site. He said this is fairly prominent area and screening is very important. VanDell referred to the landscaping plan and showed which trees will be removed for the construction of the new building and expanded parking area. She pointed out the evergreens, berms and deciduous trees on the site that will help provide screening. Waldhauser recommended that the applicant provide building elevations and renderings that describe what people will see on the north and west sides of the property when walking or driving. Dixon referred to the design of the proposed new building and explained that the north side of the building is offices and will have a significant amount of glazing that will wrap around to the west side. The building will then be separated with pre-cast that will have recesses and reveals to break up the massing and will be painted to match with both light and dark colors. Kluchka stated that CenterPoint does a lot of education and suggested they install some kind of signage that describes their energy efficient message since this is a gateway area. Dixon agreed and stated that they are looking at LEED certification for the building as well. Blum asked about the volumes of gas being transferred through the facility currently, and what the volumes will be. Long stated that the peak shaving plant doesn't run all that much, it just runs when it is really cold outside. He added that the usage of the peak shaving plant is weather dependent and won't get used more as a result of this proposal. Kluchka asked what peak shaving means. Long explained that as the weather gets colder, the peak demand goes up, so they shave the peak off by injecting the system with compressed air to maintain the volume and pressure in the system. Blum asked if there will be a change in volume as a result of proposed expansion. Long said to his knowledge it will operate exactly like it has been. Blum asked if there are any new safety considerations as a result of what they are proposing to do on the property. Long said there could be as they continue to work with the Fire Chief. Kluchka asked about the plans for installing bike racks. Dixon said bike racks aren't shown on the plans yet, but they will be included. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission March 23, 2015 Page 4 Kluchka reiterated that this property is going to become a significant gateway site. He said he is thinking about how this corner becomes a gateway to bikers. He said he would love to see any opportunities with this development and the street reconstruction to say welcome to Golden Valley. Dixon said he understands the gateway opportunity. He stated that the new pond and landscaping will be at the corner in order to highlight the intersection. Segelbaum noted that the south side of the property has bike traffic and he doesn't want the storage tanks to be the first thing people see. VanDell discussed the trees along the south side of the property. Kluchka said he is also interested in how the west elevation can be humanized and how drivers, bikers and pedestrians will be affected. He said he wants to understand how the building isn't going to seem too big when someone is walking past. Cera referred to the stormwater management plan and asked if the applicant is proposing both a storage basin and rain gardens. VanDell said they have a high water table so infiltration is difficult, which is why they decided to do stormwater ponding on this site. However, there could be opportunities for surface infiltration along the west side of the property. Kluchka suggested that if the inside of the building has a visual interest that could also be highlighted. Segelbaum reiterated that the applicant should have elevation plans and renderings ready to the show to the City Council. Kluchka opened the public hearing. Meena Shariff-Dean, 1350 Douglas Drive #106, asked is the existing pond will be removed. Kluchka said they will be removing and replacing the pond. Seeing and hearing no one else wishing to comment, Kluchka closed the public hearing. Zimmerman confirmed that the existing pond will be removed and two new ponds will be added on the north side of the site. Segelbaum asked about the requirements regarding ponds. Zimmerman said there are requirements for landscaping and the details will be reviewed as part of the stormwater review process. Cera asked if the original pond was built or if it is natural. Zimmerman said it was built. Kluchka asked staff to comment on the sidewalk and bike plan in this area. Zimmerman stated that there is a good layout for the vehicle lanes and bike lanes as part of the Douglas Drive reconstruction plans. He stated that he would ask staff from the Engineering division to come to a future Planning Commission meeting and present an updated plan of the Douglas Drive project. Kluchka asked if there are any plans for a wayside area or way finding signs for pedestrians and bikers. Zimmerman stated that there may be areas for bikers and pedestrians included in the final plans for the Douglas Drive reconstruction project but the plans are not yet complete. Kluchka asked about bus access. Zimmerman said he doesn't expect the bus access to change. Segelbaum said he is pleased to see that CenterPoint wants to invest in this site because it is a property in Golden Valley that is only going to become more prominent. He said he is also pleased to see increased landscaping and screening and he is hoping to see more Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission March 23, 2015 Page 5 concrete information about screening in future elevations and renderings. Cera agreed that this will be a vast improvement over what is there now. The Commissioners agreed. Kluchka suggested adding a condition of approval regarding design review and approval. Segelbaum said the design is usually shown`in the different plan views. Kluchka said he wants the Planning Commission to review and approve the design in this case especially because of its proximity to pedestrians, bikers, and drivers. Cera said he would like to know how this proposal compares to the impervious surface requirements in the Industrial zoning district. Zimmerman stated that the Industrial zoning district doesn't have impervious surface requirements. Cera said it would be nice to know how much impervious surface there will be on the site. Goellner stated that 66.1% of the site will be impervious surface. Kluchka suggested adding a condition of approval regarding landscaping and screening. Segelbaum agreed and said he wants emphasis placed on screening. Kluchka summarized that the conditions should include: 1) screening as it relates to pedestrians, bikes, and cars; and 2) design review and approval. Segelbaum added that he would like to require that elevations, renderings, and views from the street be submitted. Zimmerman said a condition regarding bike racks should also be added. MOVED by Waldhauser, seconded by Cera and motion carried unanimously to recommend approval of the Preliminary PUD Plan for CenterPoint Energy PUD No. 122, subject to the following findings and conditions: Findings: 1. The PUD plan is tailored to the specific characteristics of the site and achieves a higher quality of site planning and design than generally expected under conventional provisions of the ordinance. This PUD will allow the applicant to better utilize the site by developing the operations facility on the site. 2. The PUD plan preserves and protects substantial desirable portions of the site's characteristics, open space and sensitive environmental features including steep slopes, trees, scenic views, creeks, wetlands, and open waters. The plan will utilize the perimeter of the site for tree plantings and stormwater management. 3. The PUD plan includes efficient and effective use (which includes preservation) of the land. The plan brings more active uses to this large site by providing office and warehouse uses, which are compatible with the current uses on the property. 4. The PUD Plan results in development compatible with adjacent uses and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and redevelopment plans and goals. The proposed uses are permitted in the Industrial zoning district. 5. The PUD plan is consistent with preserving and improving the general health, safety and general welfare of the people of the City. 6. The PUD plan meets the PUD Intent and Purpose provision and all other PUD ordinance provisions. With exception of the issues raised by the Fire Chief, the plan generally meets the requirements. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission March 23, 2015 Page 6 Conditions: 1. The plans prepared by Loucks Associates, submitted on March 20, 2015, shall become a part of this approval. 2. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the City Engineer to the Planning Manager, dated March 13, 2015, shall become a part of this approval. 3. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Fire Chief to the Planning Manager, dated March 20, 2015, shall become a part of this approval. 4. All signage must meet the requirements of the City's Sign Code (Section 4.20). 5. A park dedication fee of $72,540 (2% of the land market value) shall be paid prior to approval of the Final Plat. 6. The Final Plat shall include "P.U.D. No. 122" in its title. 7. The applicant shall address screening and landscaping to describe views by pedestrians, bikers and car passengers including renderings. 8. The application will be subject to design review and approval that would include elevations, materials, and general renderings. 9. Bicycle racks shall be provided. 10. This approval is subject to all other state, federal, and local ordinances, regulations, or laws with authority over this development. Informal Public Hearing — Zo 'ng Code Text Amendment— Hotel Parking Requirements — ZO00-97 licant: City of Golden Vail y Purpos To consider amen ing language in the Zoning Code re ing hotel parking requireme; ts. { Goellner reminded the mmission t . t at their last meetin -ey discussed amending the Zoning Code languag ' egarding otel parking. S xplained that the current number of required parking s- ,, ces fo"I a hotel us '1.5 spaces per unit plus parking for other uses. She reviewed sever : oth "r citie,$-f uirements and said staff is recommending the parking require;t b4"changed to 1 parking space per unit plus parking for other uses. C Segelbaum asked if other cit' drs w t they feel is appropriate parking for banquet space. Goellner said not by cities :he rese`'' fhed addressed banquet parking. Zimmerman added th olden Valle is Code re ' ires 1 space per 3 seats for convention and exhibition hall elbaum sugg'sted hotel ba uet space be added to the convention and �chibition hall langua a because he is ncerned that someone might take advant if there are no require'' ents regarding ba uet spaces. Waldhauser suggeste at the language be chan - ed to say event spac s. KIUWKa opened the public hearing. S eing and hearing no one wishing to comment, uchka closed the public hearing. s c:rty0f N valley,�oldcn t0i E M 0 R A Physical Development Department 763-593-8095/763-593-8109(fax) Date: March 23, 2015 To: Golden Valley Planning Commission From: Emily Goellner, Associate Planner/Grant Writer Subject: Informal Public Hearing— Preliminary PUD Plan for CenterPoint Energy PUD No. 122—6161 Golden Valley Road —CenterPoint Energy, Applicant Background CenterPoint Energy is seeking approval of a Planning Unit Development (PUD) Permit to construct a 2-story operations facility and to replace the gas regulator building on the 13.9 acre site at the southeast corner of Golden Valley Road and Douglas Drive (County Road 102). The property at 6161 Golden Valley Road currently contains five buildings owned and operated by CenterPoint Energy for gas utility operations. The five existing buildings are used for the peak shaving boiler, peak shaving vapor, gas regulator, research and a control shed for a radio tower. Multi-family and single-family residential uses are located to the north of the site and Tennant Company is located across Douglas Drive to the west. To the south and east, there are various Industrial and Light Industrial businesses in operation. The Union Pacific Railway runs along the southern border of the property and the Canadian Pacific Railway runs along the eastern border. Summary of Proposal Approval of the proposed PUD would allow the Applicant to have more than one principal structure and one accessory structure on a single lot, which is not permitted in the Industrial Zoning District. When the property was originally developed,this policy was not yet adopted into the Zoning Code. The proposed 2-story operation facility is 64,000 square foot and would employ 60-70 additional employees on the site. Within the building, 20,620 square foot would be designated office space, 39,780 square feet for warehouse, and 3,600 square feet for a metal shop. The building would be used by employees during regular business hours with the exception of emergencies. moo^ qy 1300 6002-12GOO 1210 'j1200 1180 8108 a }x• P t 11TO 82� a`Fi �to o 1140 6319 82A2 °�. Ora 4� -i 1136 sb ' a 1126ri ju { 6533 l 6535 o 6643 i g 6541 fi539663T ' 6194 _ 6138 6192 1OD W '{ PUD 122 - Site Map The proposed operation facility is an L-shaped building that would be built in the northwest portion of the site near the corner of Douglas Drive and Golden Valley Road. The applicant has placed the building on the site to meet the setback requirements of the Industrial Zoning District. A landscaped buffer is planned within those setbacks. The gas regulator building will be demolished and rebuilt in its current location off of the driveway access to Golden Valley Road. The 1-story building will be 825 square feet in size. The applicant plants to demolish the radio tower control shed and there are no plans to rebuild the structure at this time. The minimum parking spaces required for the operations facility is 83. Essential services do not have a specific minimum parking requirement in the zoning code because each service is unique. In these cases, staff works with the applicant to determine the amount of parking necessary. The applicant plans to provide 208 parking spaces on the site. Staff finds this to be an adequate amount of parking spaces. A neighborhood meeting was held on March 12, 2015, at the Perpich Center for Arts Education. Four nearby residents attended the meeting. Overall, neighbors were generally supportive of the proposal and asked questions about hours of operation, lighting, timeline, and notification for the approval process. Land Use and Zoning Considerations The property is guided for Industrial use in the Comprehensive Plan and is zoned for Industrial use, The current uses located on the property are essential services, which are permitted in the Industrial zone. The proposed uses, which include office, warehouse, and essential services, are also permitted in the Industrial zone. The proposal is consistent with the intent and purpose of the Comprehensive Plan and the Industrial Zoning District. The following table compares the PUD proposal to the underlying zoning regulations. All of the underlying zoning requirements are met except that only one principle structure and one accessory structure are permitted on each lot. [findustriaVDIstrict't CenterPoint fnergy.PUD Flo.Jj Permitted Uses Offices, Warehouse, Essential Offices, Warehouses, Essential Services I, Essential Services Services I, Essential Services III III, etc. District Standards Lot coverage < 50%building coverage 9% building coverage Front yard setback 75' along Golden Valley Rd 186.3'from current property line 94.1' from proposed property line 35' along Douglas Drive 47.3' from current property line 36.3' from proposed property line Side yard setback 20' along east side 44.2' from east property line Rear yard setback 20' along south side >300'from south property line Height 45' maximum 34' Operations Facility 18' Research Building 24' Peak Shaving Boiler Building 14' Peak Shaving Vapor Building 11' Regulator Building Screening 6 foot fence or landscaped Contiguous tree plantings of Oak, screen separating site from Hackberry, Maple, and Pine residential uses Engineering and Fire Safety Considerations Plans for this proposal were reviewed by the City's Engineering Division. A memorandum that addresses site access, drainage and utility easements, sanitary sewer, water services, grading, stormwater management, landscaping, and tree preservation is attached. Staff in the Engineering Division recommend approval of the preliminary plan, but have instructed the applicant to explore several issues during this entitlement process. These issues relate to driveway location, pedestrian facilities, vacation of a watermain easement,final plat requirements, pretreatment of discharge, and specific landscaping requirements. The Fire Department reviewed this proposal to ensure that buildings and services are equipped with fire protection systems and that adequate emergency vehicle access is achieved on the site. In the attached memorandum, the Fire Chief outlines four pieces of additional information that are required from the applicant. Findings for Approval In order to be approved as a PUD,the City must be able to make the following findings: 1. Quality Site Planning. The PUD plan is tailored to the specific characteristics of the site and achieves a higher quality of site planning and design than generally expected under conventional provisions of the ordinance. This PUD will allow the applicant to better utilize the site by developing the operations facility on the site. 2. Preservation. The PUD plan preserves and protects substantial desirable portions of the site's characteristics, open space and sensitive environmental features including steep slopes, trees, scenic views, creeks, wetlands, and open waters. The plan will utilize the perimeter of the site for tree plantings and stormwater management. 3. Efficient— Effective. The PUD plan includes efficient and effective use (which includes preservation) of the land. The plan brings more active uses to this large site by providing office and warehouse uses, which are compatible with the current uses on the property. 4. Compatibility. The PUD Plan results in development compatible with adjacent uses and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and redevelopment plans and goals. The proposed uses are permitted in the Industrial Zoning District. 5. General Health. The PUD plan is consistent with preserving and improving the general health, safety and general welfare of the people of the City. 6. Meets Requirements. The PUD plan meets the PUD Intent and Purpose provision and all other PUD ordinance provisions. With exception of the issues raised by the Fire Chief,the plan generally meets the requirements: Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the Preliminary Plan for CenterPoint Energy PUD No. 122, subject to the following conditions: 1. The plans prepared by Loucks Associates, submitted on March 20, 2015, shall become a part of this approval. 2. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the City Engineer to the Planning Manager, dated March 13, 2015, shall become a part of this approval. 3. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Fire Chief to the Planning Manager, dated March 20, 2015, shall become a part of this approval. 4. All signage must meet the requirements of the City's Sign Code (Section 4.20). 5. A park dedication fee of$72,540 (2% of the land market value) shall be paid prior to approval of the Final Plat. 6. The Final Plat shall include "P.U.D. No. 122" in its title. 7. This approval is subject to all other state, federal, and local ordinances, regulations, or laws with authority over this development. Attachments Location Map (1 page) Applicant's Narrative (5 pages) Memo from the Engineering Division dated March 13, 2015 (6 pages) Memo from the Fire Department dated March 20, 2015 (4 pages) Letter from Judith Moll dated March 17, 2015 (1 page) Site Plans (25 pages) city +Df goldenio. .V4' MEMORANDUM valley Physical Development Department 763-593-8030/763-593-3988(fax) ,.mow..,, ,.,.,. ,..a.z—., .:"a:.An&+#'6��'., Date: March 13, 2015 To: ason Zimmerman, Planning Manager From: Jeff Oliver, PE, City Engineer Eric Eckman, Public Works Specialist Subject: CenterPoint Energy Warehouse—Preliminary PUD Review Engineering staff has reviewed the plans for the proposed CenterPoint Energy planned unit development (PUD), submitted by Frauenshuh, Inc. (Developer).The proposed PUD is located at 6161 Golden Valley Road in the southeast corner of the intersection of Douglas Drive and Golden Valley Road. The existing parcel is approximately 13.9 acres and contains the regional gas utility operations, which have been present on this site since the 1950s. The proposed redevelopment of the site includes the construction of a new operations facility and gas regulator building. This memorandum discusses the issues identified during the Engineering review that must be addressed prior to final PUD plan submittal.The comments contained in this review are based on the plans submitted to the City on February 20, 2015. Site Plan and Access The existing parcel contains the regional gas utility operations which have been present on this site since the 1950s.The site serves as a peak shaving facility that supports the delivery of natural gas to the region and includes several buildings that provide gas utility functions. The proposed redevelopment of the site includes the construction of a 64,000-square-foot operations facility and an 825-square-foot gas regulator building. The new operations facility will house the purchasing, warehouse, Home Service Plus sales and installation, meter department, and administrative and support functions.The facility is expected to employ approximately 60-70 new employees. As part of the proposed PUD, two of the five buildings will be replaced by the new operations center and gas regulator building. The Developer must obtain the appropriate City permits for demolition of the existing buildings, utilities, pavements and other related improvements. Along with the new facilities and uses, CenterPoint will continue to own, operate and manage the regional gas utility operations on this site. G:\Developments-Private\Central Park West(former Duke)\CPW Review_031215.docx Hennepin County and the City of Golden Valley have initiated a public improvement project to reconstruct Douglas Drive in 2016. The project includes the construction of a roundabout at the intersection of Douglas Drive and Golden Valley Road, immediately adjacent to the CenterPoint PUD. Work on the roadway design has begun and CenterPoint has incorporated this design into its overall plans for the site, including access and circulation. The City and County will continue to work with CenterPoint on the details of the design as the project moves forward. The plans submitted by the Developer show access points on the north and west sides of the PUD. The north access onto Golden Valley Road will primarily serve the office functions and provide employee access to and from parking lots within the site. According to the plans,the north access does not line up with the driveway entrance for the apartments across the street, which may lead to conflicts with turning movements. Prior to final PUD plan submittal,the Developer must evaluate the feasibility of shifting this driveway access to the west to line up with the driveway for the apartments. The west access onto Douglas Drive will serve as the truck access for the Home Service Plus and warehouse functions. Circulation within the site appears to be acceptable, but is also dependent on the review of Fire Chief and other staff. The PUD includes the removal of existing driveway entrances and the construction of new entrances. This work is planned for 2015, in advance of the Douglas Drive reconstruction project. Therefore, a City Right-of-Way Management Permit is required, and the location of the driveways and other improvements in or adjacent to the existing or proposed right-of-way must be coordinated with the project engineers for the Douglas Drive project. All driveway entrances must meet the City standards for commercial driveway aprons. In addition, a Hennepin County permit will be required for all work within County right-of-way. The preliminary design for the Douglas Drive Reconstruction Project includes pedestrian facilities along the east side of Douglas Drive, which will connect to the Luce Line Regional Trail located just south of this PUD. The Developer is strongly encouraged to include the construction of pedestrian facilities within the site that would connect the office building to the proposed sidewalk along Douglas Drive. Pedestrian facilities constructed by the Developer must meet Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accessibility standards. Preliminary Plat The proposed PUD is comprised of one existing parcel, which is not part of any plat of record.The property survey shows a watermain easement (document#1133773)for an 8-inch ductile iron pipe that serves the metal building in the south one-half of the site. Utilities such as this watermain that are located on private property and serve only one property owner are typically considered private in terms of ownership and maintenance responsibility. The watermain easement document will need to be reviewed by the City to determine if it can be vacated as part of this PUD process. If it is determined that the easement must be vacated, the City will initiate the vacation process, and the Developer must provide the City with legal descriptions and exhibits. G:\Developments-Private\Central Park West(former Duke)\CPW_Review 031215.docx The preliminary plat submitted by the Developer includes the dedication of public right-of-way along Golden Valley Road and Douglas Drive, which appears to be consistent with the preliminary design plans for the Douglas Drive Reconstruction project.The City and County will review the plans in more detail, and work with CenterPoint Energy on any modifications, prior to final plat approval. The preliminary plat submitted by the Developer did not include the dedication of drainage and utility easements. The final plat for this development must include easements along public streets, property lines, and plat boundaries consistent with the City's Subdivision Ordinance. This PUD is adjacent to County Highway 102 (Douglas Drive) and therefore, the plans must be submitted to Hennepin County for review and comment. Preliminary Utility Plan (Water and Sanitary Sewer) The plans submitted by the Developer show the extension of new water and sanitary sewer mains into the site. The City's water and sanitary sewer systems that provide service to these properties appear to have adequate capacity to accommodate the proposed development. As discussed earlier,there is an existing 8-inch ductile iron watermain that serves the metal building in the south one-half of the site. This watermain will remain in place to serve the peak shaving operations. New domestic and fire suppression lines will be extended from the City's main within Douglas Drive to serve the new operations center. CenterPoint will own and maintain all watermains, hydrants and valves within its site from the buildings to the service valves located in public right-of-way. The City will own and maintain the portion of the mains from the City's watermain within Douglas Drive to the service valves, including the service valves. As part of the final PUD plan approval, the City will draft a maintenance agreement for the owner's signature further outlining ownership and maintenance responsibility for the water systems. There is an existing sanitary sewer system located along the east property boundary that serves the existing lab and boiler buildings. According to the plans,this system will be removed and replaced with new mains and structures. In addition,the new operations center will be connected to this sanitary system. CenterPoint will own and maintain the sanitary sewer system within its property and the portion extending into public rights-of-way, including the connection to the City's system. As part of the final PUD plan approval, the City will draft a maintenance agreement for the owner's signature further outlining ownership and maintenance responsibility for the sewer system. In order to help reduce the amount of inflow and infiltration of clear water into the sanitary sewer system,the City has an Inflow and Infiltration (1/1) Ordinance. All buildings within the PUD must comply with the City's 1/1 Ordinance. City records show that the existing property does not have an 1/1 Certificate of Compliance. As discussed earlier,the owner intends to replace the entire sewer system as part of this project. Therefore, upon completion of the sewer work, the new sewer mains and services must be inspected and found to be compliant with the 1/1 ordinance, prior to occupancy of the buildings. G:\Developments-Private\Central Park West(former Duke)\CPW_Rev1ew_031215.docx In order to construct the utility extensions described above,the Developer will need to excavate Golden Valley Road and Douglas Drive. A City Right-of-Way Management Permit is required for all excavations and obstructions within public right-of-way and easements. All pavements and subgrades must be restored according to City and County standards. The work must also be coordinated with project engineers for the Douglas Drive Reconstruction project. In addition, a Hennepin County permit will be required for all work within County right-of-way. Stormwater Management This PUD is within the Main Stem subwatershed of the Bassett Creek watershed. The site generally drains to the northeast,to a 30-inch pipe under the Canadian Pacific Railroad,then north to the City's storm sewer system and eventually Bassett Creek. The PUD proposes to disturb approximately 13 acres and will increase the impervious surface area by about 3.25 acres. The PUD is subject to the review and comments of the Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission (BCWMC). Plans have been forwarded to the Commission for review. According to the preliminary grading and drainage plans submitted by the Developer,the PUD includes the construction of a two cell stormwater pond with equalizer pipe in the north portion of the site. Peak runoff rates, and phosphorus and sediment loads are being reduced as a result of the pond construction.The Developer has provided stormwater calculations which will be reviewed in more detail prior to final PUD plan submittal. Infiltration, filtration and volume reduction practices have not been included in the stormwater management plan due to the soil types and the presence of a high groundwater table; however, the Developer is encouraged to continue to explore ways to retain stormwater volume on site, consistent with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency(MPCA) Construction Permit. Storm sewers have been extended throughout the site to accommodate runoff from the new development. The plans do not include pretreatment measures prior to discharge to the pond. Staff recommends including 4-foot deep sump structures fitted with SAFL baffles or similar to reduce the amount of sediment that will accumulate in the pond. As discussed earlier in this review, CenterPoint has owned and operated regional gas facilities on this parcel since the 1950s. For the most part,the site has seen little change over the decades. Sometime around 2000, CenterPoint constructed a stormwater pond in the center portion of the site. It appears the excavated material may have been used to create the visual barrier(berm) along the south property boundary.The preliminary grading and drainage plans show that existing pond will be filled and site re-graded to allow for construction of the warehouse parking and loading area. Excavated soil from the new stormwater ponds will be used to extend the berm toward the west and north along Douglas Drive. All storm sewer facilities and stormwater quality treatment facilities in this PUD will be owned and maintained by the property owner. A maintenance agreement outlining these responsibilities will be drafted by the City and must be signed by the owner prior to the issuance of permits. G:\Developments-Private\Central Park West(former Duke)\CPW Review_031215.docx The Developer or contractor must obtain a City Stormwater Management Permit before construction. A stormwater management plan meeting the standards of the City of Golden Valley must be included with the permit application. Plan review and approval by the BCWMC must also be completed before a City Stormwater Management Permit can be issued. This PUD is also subject to the requirements of the MPCA Construction Stormwater Permit. A copy of this permit and the corresponding Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan must be submitted to the City before work can begin. Tree Preservation/Landscape Plan The PUD is subject to the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance and Minimum Landscape Standards. A Tree Inventory Plan and Tree Reforestation Plan have been submitted by the Developer. Based on the proposed tree removals and the required mitigation,the Developer must obtain a Tree Preservation Permit before construction can begin. The plans do not include foundation plantings, or the planting of shrubs and perennials within the site as outlined in the City's minimum landscape standards. The City Forester will review the plans in more detail and work with the Developer on species selection and location, and also address any potential corner visibility issues, before submittal of final PUD plans. Financial securities will be based upon the final tree and landscape plans submitted by the Developer. Staff will work with the Developer to determine these amounts once the plans are complete. Summary and Recommendations Engineering staff recommends approval of the CenterPoint Energy Warehouse preliminary PUD plans subject to the comments contained in this review, which are summarized as follows: 1. The Developer must obtain the appropriate City permits for demolition of the existing buildings, utilities, pavements and other related improvements. 2. Prior to final PUD plan submittal, the Developer must evaluate the feasibility of shifting this driveway access to the west to line up with the driveway for the apartments. 3. A City Right-of-Way Management Permit is required for all proposed excavations and obstructions within public rights-of-way and easements, including utility and driveway construction. The details and locations of the driveways,the utility cuts, and other improvements in or adjacent to the existing or proposed right-of-way must be coordinated with the Douglas Drive Reconstruction Project engineers, as discussed in this review. 4. The Developer is strongly encouraged to include the construction of pedestrian facilities within the site that would connect the office building to the proposed sidewalk along Douglas Drive. 5. The easement document for the existing 8-inch watermain within the site will need to be reviewed by the City to determine if it can be vacated as part of this PUD process. 6. The final plat for this development must include drainage and utility easements along public streets, property lines, and plat boundaries consistent with the City's Subdivision Ordinance. G:\Developments-Private\Central Park West(former Duke)\CPW—Review_031215.docx 7. This PUD is adjacent to County Highway 102 (Douglas Drive) and therefore, the plans must be submitted to Hennepin County for review and comment. 8. The City will draft a maintenance agreement for the owner's signature further outlining ownership and maintenance responsibilities for the water and sewer systems, as discussed in this review. 9. Upon completion of the sanitary sewer work,the new sewer mains and services must be inspected and found to be compliant with the City's 1/1 ordinance, prior to occupancy of the buildings. 10. The Stormwater Management Plan is subject to the review and comments of the BCWMC. 11. The Developer is encouraged to continue to explore ways to retain stormwater volume on site, consistent with the MPCA Construction Permit. 12. The Developer must include pretreatment before discharge to the stormwater pond, and staff recommends 4-foot deep sump structures fitted with SAFL baffles or similar to reduce the amount of sediment that will accumulate in the pond. 13. All storm sewer facilities and stormwater quality treatment facilities in this PUD will be owned and maintained by the property owner. A maintenance agreement outlining these responsibilities will be drafted by the City and must be signed by the owner prior to the issuance of permits. 14. The Developer or contractor must obtain a City Stormwater Management Permit before construction. Plan review and approval by the BCWMC must be completed before a City Stormwater Management Permit can be issued. 15. This PUD is also subject to the requirements of the MPCA Construction Stormwater Permit. A copy of this permit and the corresponding Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan must be submitted to the City before work can begin. 16. The Developer must review the City's Minimum Landscape Standards to ensure the landscape plan meets these requirements. The City Forester will review the tree and landscape plans in more detail with the Developer before final PUD submittal. 17. The Developer must obtain a Tree Preservation Permit before construction can begin. Approval is also subject to the comments of the City Attorney, other City staff, and other governmental entities. Please feel free to call me if you have any questions regarding this matter. C: Tom Burt, City Manager Marc Nevinski, Physical Development Director Emily Goellner, Associate Planner John Crelly, Fire Chief Jerry Frevel, Building Official Bert Tracy, Public Works Maintenance Manager Al Lundstrom, Park Maintenance Supervisor and City Forester Mark Ray, Street Maintenance Supervisor Kelley Janes, Utilities Supervisor RJ Kakach, Engineer Tom Hoffman, Water Resources Technician G:\Developments-Private\Central Park West(former Duke)\CPW_Review_031215.doa city 0 n4Wi (-, 4D l vaii%,� FireDepartment 763-593-8079/763-593-8098 (fax) Date: March 20, 2015 To: Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager Cc: Jeff Oliver, City Engineer From: John Crelly, Fire Chief Subject: Preliminary PUD—6161 Golden Valley Road—CenterPoint Energy The Golden Valley Fire Department has reviewed the preliminary PUD plans submitted on February 20, 2015 for 6161 Golden Valley Road—CenterPoint Energy. This Preliminary PUD application proposes the construction of an approximately 64,000 sq. ft. operations facility and an approximately 825 sq. ft. gas regulator building along with related site improvements. The site improvements include reconfiguration of the property boundaries to accommodate proposed public improvements to the intersection of Golden Valley Road and Douglas Drive North. The operations facility and gas regulator building will replace two of five buildings that exist on the site. SITE Overall the proposal for the 'T' shaped building and the proposed access of the site appears to be designed with adequate drive lane width and turning radius to allow for proper movement of large fire trucks. None of the submitted plans or specifications indicated/show the existing "manual"fire protection system that was installed some 20+years ago. In general,the system consists of a dry network of piping, valves and nozzles that originates along Douglas Drive near the northwest corner of the proposed new operations facility building.At that location there is a manual connection to City water, a fire department pumper connection x4, and electric control box to control the four banks of nozzles and a manual drain system to drain the network of pipe into the manhole at that location. All of this supplies a network of piping that delivers water to four banks of nozzles. Each bank of nozzles consists of 3 - 1000 gpm nozzles. These plans need to show the existing "manual"fire protection system. Page 1 of 3 Testing and maintenance on this "manual"fire protection system is unknown. Historically there are no test records showing that the "manual"fire protection system, which protects the tank farm, has been tested and maintained annually as required by MSFC section 901.6. Also, it appears that the system falls far short of meeting the requirements of the National Fire Protection Association 59—Utility LP-Gas Plant Code. Based on current tank configuration this system should be an automatic type system. BUILDING/SITE The new operations facility is proposed as type IIB construction with an approximate size of 64,000 sq. ft. In reviewing the water flow requirements of the Minnesota State Fire Code (MSFC) appendix B and C, this building requires a water flow of 5,250 gpm. The building is proposed to be protected with a fire sprinkler suppression system. The other four buildings on site are NOT protected with a fire sprinkler suppression system. Based on MSFC a 50% reduction in water flow will be allowed which equates to a required flow of 2,625 gpm. With a flow of 2,625 gpm the MSFC requires a minimum of 3 fire hydrants with an average spacing of 400' between fire hydrants. Sheet C4-1 shows a 3-inch domestic and a 6-inch fire line serving the building. All connections to private fire service mains for fire protection systems shall be arranged in accordance with 2010 edition of NFPA 24 section 6.2.11 options 1, 2 or 6. a. Option 1:A Yard Post Indicator Valve (YPIV)40 feet from the building. b. Option 2: no YPIV,just bring the fire protection water directly into a 1 hour fire rated room with direct exterior access into the room. c. Option 3: no YPIV,just bring the fire protection water directly into a non-fire rated room and providing a Wall Post Indicator Valve (WPIV). One of these water line configurations will be required for the 6-inch fire protection water line running into the west side of the building. The PIV is an indicating valve to control the operation of the water supply to the fire suppression system for the proposed building. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS Staff recommends approval subject to following conditions. The Golden Valley Fire Department has strong assurances from all parties that items#3 and #4 are currently being worked on by the applicant. Staff also has strong assurances from all parties that Items#1 and #2 will be worked on by CenterPoint Energy, but will require more time and effort to address. Additionally, over the next few weeks, CenterPoint Energy will develop a written proposal outlining the timeline to address these issues. This proposal will be presented to the City for approval by mid-April. 1. Submit drawings for the preliminary PUD review which include detailed information for the on-site, built-in fire protection system, that protects the forty(40) 30,000 gallon above ground liquefied petroleum gas storage tanks. The inclusion of accurate "as built" information will be used to determine/identify if the proposed new building will impact this system and/or the ability of the fire department to interface with this equipment. 2. There needs to be a comprehensive review of the fire protection features of the CenterPoint Energy campus' main hazards which includes the tank farm, tank filling operations, the peak shaving boiler and the peak shaving vapor buildings. Submit a proposed timeline on conducting an evaluation of the current LP Gas system and its fire protection system(s). This proposal shall also include a list of applicable standards that will be used to conduct this evaluation. The City and CenterPoint Energy need to have an agreed upon plan prior to this project moving forward. 3. Strategic location of isolation gate valves shall be provided in a fashion that would guarantee partial water to the site where a single water main impairment occurs. 4. Provide documentation as to which option will be utilized to bring water into the building. If you have any questions, please contact me at 763-593-8065, or e-mail icrelly@goldenvalleymn.gov March 17, 2015 Mike Jenson Centerpoint Energy 700 West linden Avenue PO Box 1165 Minneapolis, MN 55440-1165 Dear Mr. Jenson, Thank you for your letter regarding the Planned Unit Development at 6161 Golden Valley Road. I was unable to attend the Neighborhood Meeting on March 12th as I was out of town. Centerpoint has been .a good neighbor to all of us and I hope this continues. My only request is that landscaping is done around the perimeter of your property with evergreens, trees or bushes that would blend in with the environment and hide as much as possible the industrial buildings, etc. inside the property. Thank you for giving the neighbors an opportunity to be heard. Best, Judith Moll 1350 Douglas Drive, #214 Golden Valley, MN 55422 Existing Building - Summary Package AfAR20 Research IJK ......... K ` t } � North Elevation Single-story brick, masonry, and precast concrete building. South Elevation CenterPoint Preliminary PUD Submittal—February 20, 2015 Existing Building - Summary Package Research a Ik w• M w Height = 18-0" Mw-f OEM East Elevation Single story brick, masonry, and precast concrete building. Vilest Elevation CenterPoint Preliminary PUD Submittal—February 20, 2015 Existing Building - Summary Package Peak S Boiler Building i• Height - 24'-0 • . yy A { S j) t i F � r x (North Elevation Single-story metal building. - y oath lea vat o CenterPoint Preliminary PUD Submittal—February 20, 2015 Existing Building - Summary Package Peak SBuilding -pr . 10 4171 zz all r s e r, East Elevation 1 Single-story metal building. West Elevation CenterPoint Preliminary PUD Submittal—February 20, 2015 Existing Building - Summary Package Peak SBuilding r /1 Height = 14 -0 7. •4e�,.�+.�► • , r x e r North Elevation Single-story metal building. -- - - y — � South Elevation CenterPoint Preliminary PUD Submittal—February 20, 2015 Existing Building - Summary Package Peak SBuilding rr i ,, JLI 01 1*7 3 e �f w: , ' yk t , l }}} ffJJ M `YT t r n r Jam'+ , f t S, t 4. r x l h� , l r f T^ • V k it ,y Y { 4 , q f �r t o-. , a i r ^a i s t . r S y Kax.+wlMpgl.�. s : ak. r 1 Y r - a T .¢, ' +.+u«k _ r �+""_ alN. • �,,, sc..'tic-^ �� ....:a„ ti AV, � !+' t ._ '�' ,s' .' .r -.. '� "'w r►�.y�..r-'-��r.. L�. �;�,� ,w' `y r v .East Elevation - - - � ww 3. 7°: + .gip #.� "*h.!• �, _ > _ Single-story metal building. _., West Elevation CenterPoint Preliminary PUD Submittal—February 20, 2015 Existing Building - Summary Package Regulator ui in Xf ,.i t r r, y r>•, r � • , tyr � r.n i nw s-r k t� • s��.r. North Elevation Project will include demolition of existing regulator building and ' construction of new precast concrete building as part of the gas line relocation project. South Elevation CenterPoint Preliminary PUD Submittal—February 20, 2015 Existing Building - Summary Package Regulator ui in 4 f ! • { t 6 Height = 11,_0„ _ . i F a 4 i' av r East Elevation Projectwill include demolition of existingregulator building and . � f construction o f new precast concrete building as part of the gas line ae relocation project. West Elevation CenterPoint Preliminary PUD Submittal—February 20, 2015 Existing Building - Summary Package Radio owe r Control Building _y ry h t , IItt !P'r Size: 111 X 11' X 9' (height Project will include demolition of existing radio tower shed. CenterPoint Preliminary PUD Submittal—February 20, 2015 CenterPoint Energy Warehouse Golden Valley,MN CenterPoint Energy CENTERPOINT ENERGY Hauslun,TX 77251-1374 P ,TX GOLDEN VALLEY, MN PRELIMINARY PLANS FOR: EXISTING, DEMOLITION, SITE GRADING & DRAINAGE, UTILITY a„ o SHEET INDEX AND LANDSCAPE G o t O■ a CO-1 COVER SHEET 4 w M C1-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS C1-2 DEMOLITION PLAN Y Pro�aona xr°me: C2-1 SITE PLAN VICINITY MAP C3-1 GRADING,DRAINAGE PUN C3-2 EROSION CONTROL PLAN ,,• Q�. C4-1 PUN&PROFILE(SANITARY&WATER) ,y ASSOCIATES C6-1-1 PRELIMINARY PLAT CBDETAILS , C8-2 DETAILS Li-0 TREEINVENTORY PLAN „„.,W<a..w•„�•em L1-1 TREE REFORESTATION PLAN P1-1 PHOTOMETRICS PLAN cnoo PROPOSED SFI F �� LOCATION ! DESIGN CONSULTANTS •�Y a CIVIL ENGINEER �T !ffw itl» kt LOUCKS ASSOCIATES # F7 7200 HEMLOCK LANE VICKI VAN DELL ry !q 20� r SUITE 300 TEL: 763-424-5505MAR FF{/ / �j WARNING: MAPLE GROVE,MINNESOTA 55369 FAX: 763-424-5822 4 THE CONTRACTOR SHALI BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL fXIS1 ING UTILITIES.THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN fJ MAINIAINING THEIR SERVICE AND/OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONI RACTOR SHALL CONI ACT GOPHER S1 All ONE CALL AT 651454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND Pro cuima Si na WIRES,CABLES,CONDUITS,PIPES,MANI IOLES,VALVES OR 01 HER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ^•"•r n�wva..,,n..x. ^'^•'^ THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. �•a i.w�o.n rE ualir Como' CALL B6p1E YW pGl Gopher State One Cal I TWIN CITY MEA:651-4511 TOLL TREE:i-B00-252-115668 I Index: V SBeel Tidl a COVER SHEET 3 Pro M N°.: 14448 t+ CO-1 s 0 40 BD CenterPoint Energy gllo Warehouse Z ■� SCALE IN FEET F OTE: ISTING SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED SUNDE LAND SURVEYING CO. y _ Golden Valley,MN SURVEY LEGEND - EXISTING CONDITIONS so CATCH BASIN STOIEY SEWER r a ame: CenterPoint Enerp IT'I C SroRY wINNou —SANITARY SEWER A r r't , f�,/1 OA p .._� r r k�. O SANITARY MNlHOLE —I—MTERWUN o T rl 4/V ' (J^j Lr` a `> 0 WATER"HOLE �-UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC P.O Box 1374 rF n f1 ,y r F 3p5 Housaon,TX 77251-1374 t..Vl 1 NL. • 't-`.4 I.,- J'.!"'r�1 ff'f;Yy� 3 �' i� "'•' `] Ne H'. —R—UNDERGROUND Grs .i• {.f•' +'r �� hF I NGTE VPLVE — —UNOERGROUNo TELEPHONE SOO ��J ^� ... /` l 5st r I M TELEPHONE PEOESTAL —.,—O`E EAO U71U7v sA ^�I 0 POWER POLE —CM.UNN FENCE 1,Vt 0 UGHT POLE CONCRETE CURB r SIGN CONCRETE -1 SPOT ELEVATION _.iT1' CONTOUR �' \,1 I,,., �' ' `- t,..<m�' f!.-`r' �rQ'ssu3!�� _..,:'. -{ � z. �• !} " �.J-� -- - ;r�w. £ �` I 1 • .:.;s _ 91 ' Y \-" _q t, ... _-,` ;./="�•_`� '.L,}vr'iX_iZ,,kT" ,f 1 $ 1 Y�...✓�^'��'- /', 0.. L� '-% 5.L'+ t ., ..< ." -,al- =' �.�- --"_ .::- .�.Gs'= ,�....��- t`i t.l� �.: .--^I'-----� .�„r �•ay� _ an � ,H,I �L } 's. F ---we.-{ i..! r '' :a •`� f �` - y -61i►rt �_ r _ L 1� a `err- ..1 _ 1 „�,y}x.1 N -/ _.��', �A"� _...-••�. ..r,,;r' ..�,.-- � :',�" � §k � r - "t'�� '�\�. f iia o - � o g •, ,.. .:;••� ; �. BHA, .� ,.. ;:..... ,Y°.._... .- w ..., `.." '/v �%�- �T` jf- '�' ! t+�" Pma,l�a se,��e: / t a .r r\. 'w. .Y r. yrsc,.-�` � / �:• �` °�=o� ,/ ° ,�% :h. .�, #'J><. ..I - i i1 I '�j. (j xU�ill��lL�S f. y; 2�srsrs°w ��,v A eta t1 '2t k�.'✓ "i�l 1 I ,I I t. ASSOCIATES +1�4 >S I� r gr - - ', .,�. � ..,.� _ ,,...»i ..,� ,a,• _' -":_ '_- --`a. `.^•`"m"'crRN / 1`�y t t F r • ••. 111ti!%� �:I'ii,l. ,,,c. '> r a� , ,., ,. ._.r-;`--"- ,.. - - :3�. ,,.. .� .. _ ter .�.L�... a.: y:'�,..t' �� I #..�II•i•1 I si r,, -L , ` .,.:A�.. ,-.. r. ._, .. ..-. �.... -........->'."_p"' „ .: : „s p =r. i;. g - - $� :{I i i6: I r 1 I �M.a.Fc`n,.•�-ss a?`� t(!,1 cnoo i. ;JA laws I 7 { ' N:. ,sr __.. _a;,r„a/r ti.-C`r � ,..� •� _ ��"-'--'--.--+- _ idh �4C� - �' -1 { � r�l a r L. {,r ` t� T Y.. �'. L rr. , \ '•^ \ ' 1 I 'S�' `y�C�/`•`1 i '�,I t�.6 (.. fa ,1 I y.. Q ��'L -::.\ : la _ �-ty ✓'` `7y \' Y..-'.-� 1 II�II IIII�I I illiI /l _ ' CIT j3• ,` ' �: i v A P 0 N V Zak. ir' " ..;� ,....... r �..... \>.., •� A •� If "_aner,v .. R�, I IT .',� 1 III �I Ili.:. "i. ILS -�; .� ,�%t e �L��, `vl - - •`pl r :+1� -- rrl:,' ' ;� 'jl 3 „� .. .i� ..:T — � a ��'4[ A `3,ax `• $,.,\ �><.;.. lT.T,., �� .. vrl 1 '.hill- JIM ll.54 pari- - ...I ^ , ��;c:.. i� { !� y.'' ��I11 I�ll•1:. � I # y �...,--a b •^�,�'- - / ° {�: I �; j i I I I {! i't� ZF \i+,' l g j ✓ P, F, I'� Iltfr _t (' �1; }L-- n -,•w"' r.;E.� " rfjt Q. z. '1 ` T '1 A v r I 4.- v,t'� .� t�� 1` �,:;} t � r• I �f �(� > `( � \1 , ✓- I`, �� 's � ,/�-�. 7 r )) '.t � � - � � -�I k� - �.( i f 1' ,'ISI' —• -�� ,� �� ,_ �,,� �; �� .-- /� �, 1 ,, 'a � � tRA56 {, ,� �� (I �`'� 1 r-''�a,L�� i � �?�� (Isllll Ills { I A V` . v ii ,/'. .J•.., / RlR 1{.s: 1' ° c 1. % �5. -� I ��>:, xrF s��'3-.� � = 1� - :/ �, �" � r`r,✓ "t, I �I � � k ,a#/I i �t� i. � :�y�) r£T ,'\ s t 'A 7 E I � I slonaSIR==c: { �Cg�P -; ��.-.� j ,; Ast�r>r� :� �;c,, -, �;z�l�/, f,. --_-�—�f - -- -_- l Y �_��__ kaTA,�� y.�';/�^t r�2 I yl ,...«„ .»•..,.,,_.,. .I�m _. � ni+ �.l-� � s•.,9t �,. -�-'-�,39.05r�' ■ �y...',Jqt ted.? Y �r/ l/ � _ - - _— - - .ar+-r„-3�'vvy-in v.�rFn,S `I I 'ig;�y-. � � � ��` t �Y t r6 ,'\ Iq� �t 1 '..: ,,.'7�Ae nrrt.Iueo �r` .-.vrrrw�:..;.:,. �.'i. :{. .�:f r%' ��._ � •. 6 n r�oa• �...�.., v.L I....o< .e o.n T � _ � -n, » �;:, �- i ;i�'l _ 'aea a - -. _-_ "4� � •� _ _-_ ._es 1.,�cr...—;� - �a l�col,o-o: DOUGLA&..r-- !�, l z �r—m.•�-rev ---��"c"'�rv`a¢ sa. .^.i' l ��,r �� -mcg—,•I:-�� _ �Yl?<7!'£ A�4 r� ._S,A.K•NO.�1Q1) e.1 uY I AYrY• � 1 PY 9•L ~ • \ .p - PTI. �: -`� a \ - :` ._ y / — \ ; y QP `•,. '\tc `I».-N rArr_voc ral a• aVV. ` ® Gopher State One Call EXISTING CONDITIONS WARNING: THE CONTRACIORSHALL W RESNFFSIRE FOR GEEING FOR LOCAIRJNS CN ALL 3 IIAI T ID1ln HWJRLYSHALLCOOPERATEWITHALLUTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING TMER SERVKE ANO/OR RELO(AIgN OF LINES. PIN- Al NR.: Al CONTRACTOR INACONTACTGOPHERSIATEONE ULLAT6511GROUNZ 14448 Al LFA51 b LOURS IN ADVANCE FOR 111E lOUlgFd O All UNDERGROUND WSIRKR15,GRLFS.CONWITS,PRS,MANHOLES.VALVES LLWAIRBURRO R THE AS ORFS HEN D DIGLING)MING NTRA R 50IN AI NAROR 1-1 THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DIRINL CONSTRIICiMJN Al NO COSI 10 iHF OWNER C 1 -1 D 40 80 CenterPoint Energy TIN 0 n ^ Warehouse DEMOLION LEGEND: , O I u Z IT SCALE IN FEET REMG'f EXISTING BITUMINOUS PAVING _ U`V....REMOVE BIT WEAR 8 BASE,LEAVE AGGREGATE INTACT ®RWOVI FULL DEPTH PAVEMENT SECTION EOR UTILFTRS - NOTE: RWOVEEMST1Nc mNCRHEPAvINUWALK5 - I EXISTING SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED MI BY SONDE LAND SURVEYING CO. ®REMOVE EXISTING BUILDINGS _ REMOVEEXISTINGGRAVEL — -atirmi•REMOVF EXISTING FENCE,CUR88 GUTTERB RETAINING WALT. Golden NMN a_..RfMOVEEXISTINGfiNCEI5 3 �s�Srl SURVEY LEGEND — EXISTING CONDITIONS Valley, ® REMOVE EXISTING MANHOLES,LIGHT POLES,PEDESTALS,ETC. ''' �5-.�i "'�h' •� GTCM BASIN —a SIONN SEWER CQ 01 y' -� O SFdm IkWfO E — TTAJZY SEWER ntCFP'ER EneW REMOVE EXISTING TREES _.I ;_• -�- Ojp . ^( O SANITARY WJITME1—WTERLWN P.O 8074 RAI~R • WAEMJNIXE —UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC HOEOn, 773 1374 �TREE PROTECTION FENCE rle —UNDERGROUND Gly S� w r 00 LINE '! }.!"l-i f^,v, rr�r.^r.r.rrn..r.r m CAT,, VE =a—UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE M TELEPHONE PEDESTAL w—OVERHEAD nD1Y 0 POWER POLE CEWN UNK FENCE POLE LE —CONCRETE C URB Hi 0 UC (MCI Ex r I _ � n SIGN CONCRETE rV rrY'`'f l• \ ° 81Tl1MIF - I' P I as SPOT ELEVATION y1L -..CONTOUR LE, BAVEMENT:TYP' i ELEDOMINATEROWITH i J ; ELECTaIC COMPANY DEMOLITION NOTES rr f { REMOVE EX. I ?r \ /,v 33'a �-,',....--^"'�'' ��,Y-•-"r`�l .�-^^-' � 1( �� IEDCURB&GUTTER-TYP I.BACKGROUND INHJRMA ED.15 RASED ON A FIELD SURVEY 81 SUNDE r "'Y(, r,�,r✓f-r J��..� RRaIOVE,-,E("-'t„ R OTHERS THE ACCURACY OR INFORMATION PROVIDED BY ,. -1`r f- n' I�,�--.a'a I• / wr.,x.ME_R_ 1 .CONE QE� { F +I DSURVEY NG. IOLWCKS ASSOCIATES 00(5 NOT GUARANTEE a Aav,A26 S + 1i ry �M1 _ �\ ^�.. ;"'--� �,y-/^r"" 'P''�V �sL�6 _ - - ..-- -1-•—�' '-- 1.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL 1AKk ALL PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY IO AVOID PROPERTY DAMAGE TO ADJACENIPRCWEONTRACTOR THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE Of THIS PROTECT.THE CONTRACTOR v:,y_- •,- `i r'r �- •. -��"_. '/-,' _ - _-- kO,: WILL BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR ANYDA6UGES TO ADJACENT RIA - - - -" - PROPERTIf50CCURRING DURINGTHE CONSTRUCTIONPHAS[Of _I. .. t.v'E L i ECT. E„{ x,•' r/ G�TI'f.R-TVP TTERa P.; .�.-- < THIS PROM FF7L f �.�' � " X sIr�RAi ;.1'r �. / .. / ✓ 'tX 1 .I 3.THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND ,�l.i. R VE .., `• r: r. `: , OMINOUS 1_-_ ( ('•r li MAINTAINING I RAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SUCH AS RAMICADES. PraessM 5crvicn: 1', - _. / . + 'r '.:�(- ' iA i ,...,.ry >' WARSIGNS,ILAGMEN •E:;.'"y f R �, " .._ I riy CONTROL HMOVEMENT OFA TRAFFIC WHERE NECESSARYHISiO v""y \ REMOVE~ i '•'� f° .�,.. ,BUT[bIN'G - 1-• PLACEMENT Of THESE DEVICES SHALL BE APPROVED By'HE • �/ SY.F r I 1 ENGINEER MIgt TO PLACEMENT.TRAFFIC CONTROL DfVICFS i REMOVE EX. � ' *MOVE Ex. I I SHALL OFTRAONfORM10 IOTTANDAOPRIATEMINNESOTADEPARTMENT ASSOCIATES .Q4 ` REMOVE EX. REMOVE E%. - '• :REMOVE E% ZON(3tFTT _ 1 I Y OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARDS. / BITUMINOUS CONCF.R/ETE ��,,.,- .. t(3RM 5EW ER TVP Lti'11 I )! I I I Y I.INACCORDANCE WITH GENERALLY ACCEPTED CONSTRIX:IION a REMOVER(. i/� ' ` \`^��(F S ri i LIGHT PDE( PAVEMENT TY �/ PRACTICES,THE CONTRACTOR WILL B[SOLELY AND COMPLETELY JS/ RESPONSIBLE FORCONDUION50N THE pBSITE,INCLUDING 1 w I! } k SAFETYOF ALL PERSONSAND PROPERTY OCKINGIHE COR :u Ore-so:w Tao Y3 i;1 PERFORMANCE Of THE WORK.THIS REQUIREMENT WILL APPLY piwrreNdVnll�xsssossury \ ... - X X "' ! J)g CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING .rc. ,. \.., ..,. ErX I I 1 (,-- F* _(_ I v FECURS. ['., :I ^I S.IHEDUIYOFTHLENGINEERORIHEDEVELOPERTOmNDUCI CONSTRUCTION REVIEW OF I HE CONTRACTORS PERFORMANCE IS GADO RE ---. ' ' - UTILLTY 80X, It %"I I !{ NOT INTENDED TO INCLUDE REVIEW OF THE ADEQUACY Of THE �, r` -• - - ' MEASURES IN,OR NEAR THE u ! I I i 1 I. CONTRACTORS SITE. O ` :.�,:. i ,' .,.i.^, L.J I._,) CEJ l.J ..J I 1-j.S' : a :cat on: r.•m.w.�.•e..re.....a...A. y/. �EMOVE E%. , /� CONSTRUCTION SITE. u:-- -_f.,_..�_ e L UTILTIV BOX 1 TM� REMOVE EX. CURB&GUTTER-TVP _ r �^ 6.BEFORE BEGINNING CONSIRUCI K)N—CONTRACTOR SHALL r•A �v+ �+=• _� REMOVE EX,TREE$ -"'CC'IARD RAIL e;_, - it INSTALLATEMPORARYROCKENTMWEPADATAUMINTSOF LIGHT POLE y .- M VEHICLE EXIT FROM THE PROJECT SITZ—FOROCKfNTNANCEPAD a""•" w' \ \ 1 REMOVE EX. '. i / ., I <...:: �. .... /'1 �i \` UTILITIES .- REMOVE EX. l(J{: v+ SHALL 11 MAINTAINED UT FCONE DETAR FOR THE DURATION v� ' l Y Y LIO ' /I "N Of THE PRgFCT.SEE SHEET C3-1 EOR DETAILS. "mom A x. \\ Y . % REMOVE E%. !I I (, Tx c.2cew ru�wvcn,yw, a 7.4 a..� 1 :,• jCONTROL ORES SNAIL Bk STORM-SEWER r ( ': l J +r wT &MANHOLE-TYP CONCRETE I _ ESTABLISHED AROUND Hf SHE PERIMETER AS SMCWJN AND IN — �" REMOVE EX.TREES y REMOVED(, I -:.i MANAGACCOREMENTMACTICES,CIANCEWITH ITTY REQUIREMENTS AND Hk IJ-11_5 ix aY t SHOWN ON SHEET C3-28C&I OF THE PROJECT PUNS. £\,{#r GAS LINE U REMOVE EX L. y> wZ, `F YF A.\ i METAL BUILDING a 8.ALL CONSTRKING ACTIVITY TAKE INCLUDING STOCKPILING, p \ a„ -- '+ STAGING 8 PARKING MUST TAKE PUCE ON-SITE. — 9 TE NARY STREET SIGNS LIGHTING B ADDRESSES SHALL Bf REMOVE(%. PROVIDED DURING CONSTRUCTION. MI _ ap \ - ` '.. STORM SHYER& --- _ , - 10.CONTRACTOR SNAIL OBTAIN A CITY E STATE PERT FOR f'E1 R\ MANHOLE+TYP - OBSTRUCTIONS AND WORK WITHIN RIG 101WAY.PERMITIS _ --- REQUIRED PRIOR TO REMOVALS OR INSTALLATION ( L \ yyla"k , l . " I' ` II.PROTECI EXISTING SITE FEATURES THAT ARENOTNOTEDFOR REMOVEEX - 'J ( REMWAL.If DISCREPANCIESARISE,NOTIFY ENGINEER i E(TU�LEpD IMABURATLYFORRESOLUTION ;C3l \. s \N - FENCE-TYP x.. sl Y y-'\: C © \ \. •` 12.WEHAVE 5110WNf%ISIING SERVICES BASED ON CITY AS-BUIl15 REMOVE EX.GAS LINE _ 8 A WPHER ONE LOUT(THERE MAY BE SERVICES THAT ARE NOT SHOWN. 1�,^ \• \ \ •, i r REMOVE EX 13.NO WORK TO BE DONE OUTSIDE OF CONSTRUCTIONSILT Y SEX* 1 --'- -"""'- - I - FENCE WITHOUT MDR AUTHORI]ATION FROM ENGINEER. STORM SEWER TYP f ?-- `: 14.THE REMOVAL OF EXISTING SERVICES WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH IHf REMOVE EX.TREES ' " - GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND UTILITY OWNER ADDITIONAL SERVICES MAY EXIST. I _.k '£ .' i Z�, REMOVE EX. + 15.5T KILL OPENING PERMIT IS REQUFUD FROM THE CITY OF V iy BITUMINOUS X ` any :Z PAVEMENT-NP GOLDEN VALLEY. 16.CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLY A TRAFFIC CONTROL PAN.TH( na Si nature' F l ■ J a i�Iu EXISTING MANUAL DRY PUN SHALL BE SUBMITIED IO MNDO18THE CITY IOP APPROVAL T "i h .p;,l,r NO LATER THAN ONE WEEK PRIOR TO ACTIVITY.. a WATERLINE ANDI r ;- f• ,^ s"-,-' '?>-S- � 3 .GOMPONEKIS-70REK�7UN___ __ . .. _... �__ _..._. — _._.. - ■■ r. I , r _ ra REMC FENCE- JI` _- �_ Tl _-� - y ! ry .,. , •:,'" ,"'. t° d S DRIVE N REMOVE EX I DOUGL//''yy N. AS FENGE_TYP .. , .w� (N.C.S.A.N. NO. 102) Set 4) I * —_ It a ® Gopher State One Call — TSL DLE it-14- DEMOLITION PLAN s 'c WARNING: THE CONTRACTpt LWL BE RiSPONLBLE H)R CAILINGFOR LOCATION$Q AL1 UOSTING UILnLS.IHEV SHALL COOPFRAR N'i1H ALL UllllY COMPANES IN MAINTAINING 1HERTSERVICiANW OR RELOC TK FI CR LINES. THECCINAST M H TOR SHALL fONIACI GOFER STATE ONE FALL AT 651 UNDERGROUND 1'1"N7D Al IL�ST M ERJURS 1N ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS CE ALL UNDERGROUND (l WIUS, RES CONDUITS,,IC tCONT FS,7ORSHET_—RBLIRIFD STRUC1lIRF5 BEFORE DK:CJNG.IHC CONLRAClORL1Al1 REPAROR REPLACE S THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NOCDST 10 THE 8 OWNER C1-2 CenterPoint Energy 0 40 Bo NOTE: EXISTING CIVIL LEGEND PROPOSED Warehouse EXISTING SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED ! �-' sANIIARYMA"HOLE 4�I o BY SUNDE LAND SURVEYING CO. a� s1ORMMANHOLE QQ _ CATCH BASIN SCALE IN FEET CULVERT C (; HYDRANT 4? GATEVALVE N I POST INDICATOR VALVE iry LIGHT POLI. 01 POWERPOLL I �-� slcN Golden Valley,MN .- ,E 1 fir,. srnL BORINGS �4- CenterPoilR Energy WATER—NHOlE L_pOAD TELEPHONE MNHO L E POB7K 1374 UTILITY M\NNDLE Houston,TX 77151- 1374Rpjr .... ( ELECTRIC MNHOLEONE WATERSERVI ^ 'I ..-..._--� Soo K�..xt'1-�i„�'".-�-." �!+"..r, � .y- 7 —g`— SANITARY SERVICE e^ r", HANDICAP lam- "-r' C. HANDICAP PARKING C+ DIRECTION OF FLOW BSF Z- Y SPOT ELEVATION � CONTOURS i s T --}-- SANITARY SEWER 111196iese�Bsr-�'',�,, _, r. —>---' sroRM SEWER N yw ROL �! o �" 6 -_I-_. WA ERAIAIN -l- \ -'+�'_ �y'-C.tl't•I..L-` r f f. _ f'MSd Bim- � �-s V-- FOR UMIN ---FY- ��-Y'sy.3-L"-' ri �,�,_��YyY{yi-+�'��-.'-"�..-•_" ��/�!'� .�„•.•"-�� _B� � ORA(EiILE --a>-ot- SHE ��,.X�"'`-�i`Y''". vr,-rvn'.(rrT"(! -, * �•��M_ ../_� IK � �ssa....s,: CURea GUTTER es ��y-T,Y'15�-Ate.,_-- ..,y:'nM'rr'f....-�-"'..�- j' -.._ �.y'�J " '' K ¢ .-T--.__--...-_•---_• - .- •_ .__,- _. __ ^v-yr.. REi IRED NWALL T (vWYwvA - V - .�i3',J�-+^ rfJ.(v^`J+� .I• H� �/l I p J�- �feE' 7 ,....�-- -' _ EASEMENTLINE ------ SETBACK LINE i_'1y- FENCE LINE -K-t p ✓ 7[S �` �� t f, (.- J.. r _ — —UNDERGROUND ISLE ' 1 V Pro essiona Service .L L % C�' a"mm �'j-t I }� T I r- ( },,•� vfl .....---UNDERGROUND GAS 14 C l ZAII /� J �_ F f I I 1 l I E _.._-,p`__ OVERHEAD UTILITY 24A,� JAY- a Q� �� 1v l ( I I l 1 I I :I SITE PLAN GENERAL NOTES ASSOCIATES J} ¢ IL. it Il�- - l✓i'�IJ - f J1 I SfiB�A�Ni BUIIDING SETBACK(ACROSS PROM RESIDENTIAL(=)SET 1+� '��"^•s^^' - ` FRONT BUIIDING 3LT8ACK=35 FT. 4M aw \\\\\ \\\\\ ETBACK Z0 IT. RUR BUILDINGS SETBACK IO IT.FRONT ❑� DEPARKRNGSHBACKING K 10FT. Olols '=I•d Ii::-I (e= I FAR PARKING SETBACK=TEXT. 1 ! NN CARD +' I ZONE F%STING ZONING=I-INDUSTRML PROPOSEDZONING=1-INDUSTRIAL I PARKINGSUMAMRY \\ LYE I l .J'..J f'•.I J t_J'..-1 .7 REGUURSIALIS- 169 HANDICAPPEDSTALLS=6 rr5� r FLEfI STALLS= 53 _= Sl u l AR rsnu..vs .OwchaWmt {/,�•�) ��\ \ sN\\ 'E' / L - i is i}-/ ! LAI AREA 00% =1398 AC 1 3S - 1 11 t IMPER\'IOUs SURFACE AREA 858 AC.=66.1% bolm. 8 r 'E. I� BUILDING SURFACE AREA 1.17 AC-1A% PERVIOUS SURFACE AREA 123 AC=)I.9% 1,AL1 PAVING,CONCRETE CURB.GUTTER AND SIDEWALK SHALE BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DETAILS SHOWN PER SHEET C&i AND THE REQUMEMENIS OF THE CITY.SEE UNDSCAPE AND ARCHITECTURAL PUNS FOR ANY ADDITIONAL HAROSCAPE .am' • (py �_. '.. `/ r APPLIULgNS p C \ \ 1 Z f 3-THE CITY DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING AND BUILDING INSPECTIONS ! 1r; _ DEPT.AND THE CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED Al LEAST �f- ; -~ - (aEWALK PRIOR ET OR DRIVEWA WITHIN THE STREET RIGHT OF WAY D s, m 1.MINNESOTA STATE STATUTE REQUIRES NOHFIATION PER%OPHER STATE / \\ SBO MIN I I �, ONE CALL'PRIOR TO COMMENCING ANY GRADING,EXCAVATION OR UNDERGROUND WORK "l'V 4.ANY SIGN OR FIXTURES REED.1H IN THE RIGHT OF WAY OR AS N \ 1 PART OE THE SITE WORK SHALL BE REPLACED BY THE CONTRACTOR IN Cis © ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY REQUIREMENTS.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PRfSERVf AND MAINTAIN ANY EXISTING STREET LIGHTS AND TRAFFIC 7 SIGNS PER THE REQUIREME1,0501 THE CITY. 5.CLEAR AND GRUIS AND RI-E ALL TREES,VEGETATION AND SHE DEBRIS \ r� 1 \\ PRIOR 1OGRADING fM ALL ROVEMA DIERLAISHALLBF HAULED FROM 'j \\\ \\\ \\ \ ` CENTERPOINF ENERGY W ( THE SHE DAILY AND DISPOSED IX PROPERLY BY CONTRACTOR ALL R OFFICE/WAREHOUSE �-1 aTHE NCONTRAND ACT SPECIFICATIONS. REMOVALSONTROL PERFORMED R r CLEAR( HDI TANS.EI,5 V I,511 OL T CHI S SNALI BE , \ � I � IMMEDATfIY ESTABLISHED UPON REMOVAL 6EE SHEET C311 6.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REQUIRED TO MIA.ALL PERMITS FROM ` l THE CRWOR Y AS REQUIRED FOR ALL K WITH EHL STREET AND PUBLIC K RIWAY. ).ASIGNIFIIGNIEIGANI PORTION AND 1110 IN IUDS1111 NOT SIgVM ON THIS pro esslanaS a PROPOSED REALIGNMENT ICI 11 \ i \ 1 '--'"--s-s--a a- L SHEET AECIUVCRIB[O AND PROVIDED IN FURTHER OfTAII ON THE P�� OF GOLDEN VALLEY ROAD _ ` \ \ "ai ARCHING AND OTHER UNURES.PLANS THIS INCLUDES LANDSCAPING, VALLEY BY ROAD RS !�\ \ f�J� \ ` is 1 .: LIGHTING AND OtHFR FIXTURES. } ' 8.861)CONC0.fTf CURB AND GUTTER SHALL BE INSTALLED AI iHf EDGE OI II ...1 + Ri rl��.,!_lr-YY✓.Wv-.^!'v'Y'/':!v^fv'./vy M' ALLCOMMON DRIES AND PARKING LOTS THE CURB SHALL BE TARRED v,rWlvm lxlH AND DROPPED CONSTRUCTION NOTES: DNIWAL DRIVEWAY ENTRANCES. Ne 1e nl J ., iLM _ -_ - CIA 1 -{ T•` 9. PEDESTRIAN RAMPS SHALL FAILS. DAI'THE LOCATIONS SHOWNAND r- CiR.61 __ - _-- -- -_ {j{j}..��,,�� AS SHOWN PER THEOVIL Dfinit5. 1 Cmoo: p - '� ` i�/ / _\ _ -� ----- - -_-'-'--,- _ i - �- _ __ - r4F•+a IHECONTRACTORSHAUSA-UTBITIJ.1 U1AND CONCRETE t a I tb PAYI-NISAS SHOWN ON THE PUNS REMOVE E%SDNGCURBAND - - -- -- --- GUTTER AND NSIALL B62/CONCRETE CURB AND CUTTER. aQ{VIE- R 1- HESTESMETS04ANDC-FORGRADNGANDULILITRI. � I I LH.C.S.AH IN 102L— _ ------- i�l -- pp ; Of-�-=-i= - —P- PROPOSED REALIGNMENT ( CEE OF DOUGLAS DRIVE Y uu aHac YUF BY OTHERS L- -j ® Gopher StateOne�Call SNM iI e: PRELIMINARY WARNING: SITE PLAN \ THE CONTRACTOR SHALL In RfSPONSIBIF FOR CALLING EOR LOCA(IONS Of ALL \\\\\ `1 \\\ -INE UTKIIKS.THEY SMALLDI ORRALEWIIHALLUIRHS.LYIAWANFS IN CXTSDN NINGTHEM-SH AND/ORRFTOUTH ALL UTILITY THE CONIRACIOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER SIAIE ONE CALL AT 651�54UW3 \ AT LEAST N HOUR5IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS IX ALL UNDERGROUND 14448 S �\ \\ \\ WIRES.GBLfS,CONDUITS.PNFS,AANIIOLES,VALVFSOROIHOf REARED \\\ \\ \\ STRUCTVE.SHEN DIGONG.LRING CONSTRUCTION AT N COST THE No.: THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAQD DURING CONSTRURgN Al NO CYbI TO THE OWNER ^/ L-1 D aD aD CenterPoint Energy all ^ ^ Warehouse c SCALE IN FEET NOTE: - EXISTING SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY SUNDE LAND SURVEYING CO. EXIsnNe CIVIL LEGEND PRDPoseD Golden Valley,MN -r T�Yk-+'�„r ✓ SANITARY MANHOLE i STORM MANHOLE ® o a j .'S�-E,,,..----< .-. t LATCH BARN ON CemerPoint Energy --' n - !y � +. ; CULVERT a ��fRQAtJ � �,.,- = .,_rr� 'r.' - r 1 11 cADRANT N Houston,. rziiisi-L3�< f'� ,i r 7 L,,,'i•4 POST UG.,POLLTOR SPY SooPOWER POLE SIGN 1 SOLI BORINGS , .I-.-•.--"'' �.y -� �{ wpw TT"AA'CIL~• fI i ,/ M _ :", 4 1*"S-r�. /IJ./,-.,..-„,',Y 'ryE,j�.1'J.fc�•�i>+/, RA_ WATER MANHOLE }\. ..- .r �x�h, ”"". � m +S/ T..'/vT+- P< -�� °".�-. 4 •� t}, ::l rELEPHONE MANHOLE c �'yi�"L-D"�.r�/-• .+/Ill y.T"'.�ZJtI .-/' ` I \•. tea.."----.".-+.."'- -5, 11•^ .i^'J,`� ./"'/L"'i ..� \•`Yi t� (: UTILITYMANHOLE \�p5�,,,,..�- '-..-• t 't-t_I-t� .ice iI i 1 i/ , ♦. ELECTRIC MANHOLE WATER _. —,— ' ,.�-��t� �� •�+/r,.�l y .�G:°"�� „sr � 1/ a �' , rt SANITARY SERVICE IANDICAP PARKING } DIRECTvas DIRECTION Of FLOW —M- SPOT ELEVATION COY �-�.�-0t`"+'.' ST�` /' `" .,-� 1 "l a.r _ ti _ \ —'-1_`_-. - __.-"-•ypd� -,— — o.•r-. Nr«IRS —"EMS/ 7 ' S\NITARY SEWER STORM SEWER `� .. 3 \`,-- •, -.- -.r `/�j�� /gu% gi� J WATERMAIN r � � FORCE-1.N It t ,.,. -- . ,..y/ •� I ,... // � '/ - { fvE.v.'ss *;1l- r•_ I - l ' DRAIWILL BT— r, 1 I�II�\Ii '¢ FENCE rs Pr�a_v we it �i' CURB A,GER ♦ f 1 Ia'Nry gin: \_ \l 3 7./ /! } '•1 t'' _ v I P —--- .- RETAINING WALL llf l' I �t4 + Y. .... . /ASSOCIATES r .. 1 1 I1+11 TREELINE Y I �..� ._%,J 11 I I) EASEMENT LINE•, v , kMW P . \ � STIFACI f FENCE LINE W n r ♦ _ Y 1 I I I ---iEt. -UNDERGROUND TELE 11 v II�(Il� ll �I .nsms --tea. _.. OVERHEADLHIILIIYS CADD '"�,�\ \�j��y /. ��♦ _-., -'� ? a,'. v � }m : - !1j i f� I t -- „t GRADING DRAINAGE&EROSION CONTROL NOTESIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII I _ , i c jI I�I�II.I�II I.THE OCATIO SAND DIMERITEM NSIONS BUIL ARCHITECTURAL NANSfD PAVING LOCATIONS RAMPS, BUILDINGS,VESTIBULES.SLOPED DOWNSOUING,EXIT _ � I j PORCHES,RAMPS.ENTRY LOCATIONS AND LOCATIONS Of DOWNSPOUTS t ♦.. - I ♦ '��\ /�- -' '/// ", \ y u ---'PAr-� �`., `i.J ( _ yrs-,• t _�:._-..� "11��I!IIIril,Ill1l'I ].ALI DISTURBED UNPAVED AREAS ARE IO RECEIVE MINIMUM OF M INCHES OF TOP !. \ l \ , ".- t :.�1. •-T - ... TII III• l I SOILANO SOD OR SEED.ALL LANDSCAPE ARFA55HALl Bf IRRIGATED. THE CONTRACTOR MAGESHALL ADAKE ALI PRECAUTS DURING HE TO AVOID 1'c..� f "� -vf f - \•-.��\ Fy, 1 II II IIt it II I� I-, 11 . PIfOPERIYDAMAG[IOADNCENI PROPERTIESDURINGTHLSPONSRUCTON — �aI v / \ t\\ \ v J i t i 1 _ 1` i Yi" �l44 11I I 7-, PH&SEOT THIS PROTECT.THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE HELD RE5PON51BlE FOR ANY — 1 : 1 ,I i { I,I 1 ( II DAMAGESTOADNCENTPROPERIIESOCCURRINGDURINCtHECONSTRU TI N -p rn - y1� -"� .�L_.I, i'� is } c PHASE Of THIS PROTECT. OR IDING AND MAINTAINING \g Illi \ a SJ�'�I "it rill ATRAfFIICHE CORACTOR WILL BE NTROLL DEVICES RSUCHAS IBARRICADES,BLE FARNING SIGNS,DIRECIgNAI ��E..� SIGNSfLAGMEN AND LIGHTS TOCONTROL THE MOVEMENT Of TRAFFIC WHERE I,.i 1q� -_� T- 1 { NECESSARY.PLACEMENT OF THEY DEVICES SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER rr (jy ,""• ,,\\`.\\ _\'`} /\\� \\ � , } /(t�'i..E C `I^`�{^' x ..-:. '�-1 ji I '� i+ I! PRIOR TO PLACEMENT.TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONfORM TO THE L4APPROPRIATE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARDS. rn 1 1 \ '} -- 9 -_-- ll) I j �' ♦ I i I i i' I I"+�Kv S.BEFORE BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL A / O / \ 5. ^ TEMPORARY BOCK ENTRANCE PAD AT ALL POINTS OF VEHICLE EXIT FROM THE � } \ e Y•/•}'SI" IS. `4 J' f t� I!6 i�' IECT SITE. MID FOR CICK ENTRANCE OF NfPRLLBC SHALL MUNTAINED THE ON THF it ♦z �, \A�' \! ,\.� '+�\�� \\ �� \\\ 1 tl '\ CO rr.JJ,..J'� -J ..-/ CIVIL DETAILS SHOTS Of THE PROILCT PLANS. \\\\ EROSION\ }, km 4 `! k, t ( Ij ! `• 6.EROSION ANOSEDIMfNTAIION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE ESTABLISHED AROUND THE ENTIRE SITE PERIMETER AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH NPDE5 PERMIT ✓ 7� '\ 1-+f'"` ,y ♦♦\ \ 1\\� \ `) I J 1' '^\ \_ / �jtt ! REQUNEEMEN15,81STMANAGEMINTPRACTICTS,CITYREQUIREMENTSANDTHE DETAILS SHOWN ON SHEET 08-1 ANDC8201 THE PRCMECE PLANS ).EROSION CONTROL BMPS MUST of DEPLOYED AND MAINTAINED FOR THE 2 fy...-'� t//�. ♦� \\`2\ \\� �, -- - -- -__ r Il, DURATION Of SITE CONSTRUCTION,AND MUST REMAIN MI PLACE UNTIL PAVEMENT SURIA[ES HAVE BEEN INSTALL ED AND FINAL TURF ESTABLISHMENT .....-� �. �\ �,,�. \• \ \\ \ ' - �l v 1 HAS BEEN ACHIEVED. Y ' 4{T'' t , I \\ II •v mi ,,p`�--t>]^/ ,'� If e.SOELS TRACKED FROM THE SITE BYMOTOFS MUST B CLEANEDDAILY AOR MORIE FREQUENTLY, QTAS NECIESSM00) FRO PAVED WAY URIFACF THROUGHOUT THE DURATION Of CONSTRUCTION. 9.ALL SOILS MUST BE SIABRI2ED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE BUT IN NO CASE LATER ---"-' ' TRUCTI ACTNITYHASTEMPORARILYOR \v y e 11 �E- \, , I / �E �a ♦ �F 1 = THAN II IIAYSAEASfD. s M' PFRMANENTIY CEASED. Pro( - Si '� F' l } „' ♦ ` I 1 I r,.. . IB.TEMPORARY OR PERAANfNI MULCH MIMI BE UNIT ORMLYAPPLEDBY j I , ; / MECHANICAL.OR HYDRAULIC MEANS AND STABILIZED BY DSC HORING OR usf Of HYDRAULIC soE Sue1D2ERz ^a-"• �� q , /','-..r --- .,r _ i YJi..� y I1.PROVIDEAIEMDEN% RASST H)MIX XSPREAD AT 11NGIXSMES THE U E, ♦,•y Ova.al:>[ FAST-GRI RG COVER IS TO IFFMAIN I PLACE 1.5 EYOND[USUALRATf t -—_ — _ PERWING ASM ,TWO-THIRDS ER IS TORE MAIN MX SHALL BE CO HEPDOf ,ane. on i ' \, %� } .\ ♦..,///��• "'NNIS_ �- -- �\ PERENNMLGRASYS, iNKKO50L THE SUED MIX SHALL BE COMPOSED Of �m Izt Canuo. -.- :.a+..:. I �- — /d \ - _ _._ — '�.`'�....:.A - _--. .♦1,__._ �-- _- -F�'". JET GROWING ENTRANCES NCESAN CO- ua 12.ALL EN UIREME TS OF THNECTgNST ONTRACTOISHALLBE KONSPERFORMiD PER — THE PERMITS TI THECITY.ASREQUIRACIORSE CIT BE RF5PON518LE FOR =.A--rte-SLS f /�/♦� Da\r: -55:'r � uVl _ -(�1301(+K3.._ _- j ,%"' �P,r _ {_ __ ;"; -rocas-rB-- "'�' All PfRMIiS AND NOTIFICATIONS AS REQUIRED BY THE CITY. 13 YE LRILITYPLANAND STORM SEWERPROfILES FORFURIHER D[IAII REGARDING i \ I' ___ ___- _ ___-_ �- _ __-_-_ -_ _ THE STORM SEWER. _NCL fQ2- .y" -------- -- -- -- --- - - -Att ------ - - w 171 a I II \ \ i' yx i Gopher State One Cali B,Y AREA:Rsl.6.-Rpm j—_ _ ,o.F EX I_RR -:B. aN 91eet iiBe. PRELIMINARY WARNING: GRADING&DRAINAGE IITCONTRAaR1svoN oR-ULBLnRE-uurc+c FORuluTgnsaF ALL PLAN EXISTING UIEIiES.THEY SHALLCOOPERATf WNTH ALL UTILITY NMIPANES IN \\ MAINTAININGIHEWSf AND/ORRELOCAl10NOFLINES. PmIM No.: THECON SNAIL CONIACr GOPHER siAlE ON[CALL Al fS1�S5LWI \ \\ \ Al IFASI b HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR IME LOCATIDNSOF AN UNDERGROUND14448 WNES,CMBLFS.CONDUILS,PIPES.MANHOLES.VALVES ENFOIHFR BLARED �\\\\ \\ \ 'HEASTRUCTURES.,OREDIGGNG.iHF.CONIRACTORSHNATE RL CRREP1ACl INo.: 'HEAW DAMAGED HFING,ONSTTm. AINO Co51 101Mf \ A"\ \\ \� OWNER 3-1 s -. �pILF�aA� LIr1�13 j rz✓r y , rC D 4D 80 CenterPoint Energy ...I-f v^'" f �'> 1. Warehouse 500 Z IN FEET :1 '3i ....- j' SCALE 'IL ..-_. ,-.Te1 3 `-` '>irsa•_"' `1" r;.N ,'"Bw -.1 ' ` NOTE: v •. --`"-- �-�° -r�_rd:�Uj//�.� ,�.c%'(FV�l" : ' �.,-- -/' � f � EXISTING SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED �-^' 1� •., �E��,r-�.� ;��'� -"I"'� _; - �,� t L BY SUNDE LAND SURVEYING CO. k '� =-y�"� /�-%'%i'"els' - r ;. ..I EXISTING CIVIL LEGEND PROPOSED .- ."- 7 / �° \ GoldenVall MN SANITARY MANHOLE • �' -.,. �.- \ "�-.%. l _�.,,�,-_,..,+^ ./ I 1•`ES STORMNHOLE CATCH BASIN 4 CATCHTHM ®® CenterPoint Energy Fi , -3•"�-+♦:[-l'�1�: %/'.� � _� f p�yf.. e:. �,,,_ 1 , CULVERT Q HYDRA m NI � P.O 8X71374 c _ WTEVAIVt 101 Houston,TX 77251-1374 -ca - \\^-�-^ ,. �. / ,y�.� �,. .-.-. -,vf- � � � i,�• w. POST INDICATOR VALVE i �- �� R\ \ `:1 _�'%' -•' !i�]iB q- ELFT _� LIGHT POLL T X - i q POWER POE, � ' -' _ .._'. N -, rJ DB 1 {`„ �•. {�� 1 j- 1 r �) c S% / i r r c/ 1� \ / * } '•--,s 111'( ��. 1 �: / -s- SIGN T BENCHMARKn M .A < ._ ' ;✓ / a - I I I I I ( 71 I 1 1 ,,!j I 1 1iY� _ soBORINGS \ `'. ''` i1 '•` ��.._.a 0 7 ! 1 I I Irl 1 j Q, WATER MANHOLE \ v I !I I Ij TELEPHONE MANHOLE \\\"\3\Z\^��}\1 3 \ B ,_ ->/ I \ �_�_-i✓/,,,, - - ,,...- \ 11,CC_.`-t�:. H 1 5 vsnr.. 'I e��r"C<��i • 1/I -° ,Vit,w!r ^%..ri'J_'._. �fr�( _iI i�IE�L!is�e 1 I I�/I�t I �('jijS�(�1L!Ii'�lj��',,l�'�,�"`�TTT�I114�!I1 HUATNILDITICY AMPAPNAHRKOINLE } ELECTRIC MANHOLE(f , I'll wnTER SANITARY SERVICEJi!jII;I f+I Ti-c -4 - RECTION Of FLOW tm / SPOT ELEVATION I! ' I I ',Ar ' !I7r II!I)I II �! •' .-e;.•., DI -TOURS z //y ! jSANITARY SEWER --- ' �iIJ �I ii s �ERSAMIN 3 .. t � � � �y .. _:- �`. ,f ��\ -. ' � �� I - FORCEMAIN --N- - _ I 41 li, \ \. t\/\ - II ` u __. - :..� 1. "^ -1•i! �.3' 111 (�I Irl II ,: ". DRAINTILE r /' °!`. �� A.VA ,. / - -e L-''� 9 I; I, it 1 jIIit Ali rl I'��lj �� t �� I • ' ti, (` `' ( i 1 j 1 SILT FENCE 1KP Cs.n.. 4M ;'I >_ .`\�.\\ I4 4� I(` 11,Y - �l•1 j jjli '1{l jS¢� - CURB b GUTTER • `/ ..FQLLssk!e,\ \ j�\\ �.. { III .SEI REIAININGWALL ASSOCIATES 1':5. '1:•pS \' \ .. .\ TREELINE /V'Y'a'Vvl"n m : y ` z \ j t i X11 I�{ �- IO!',s ��m`�/.� �` 14 �"X/Y�\i\,,\ \\•�\\\„,.. \\ .. \ ,v W,1'.\ Z /�If II�I l!I,7�Ii\gr,,\/• �"� I 7 v�v'A m/1 P_ .. 1 r tYEfi,lAtl'.,.t�Jr.a!, (((;I!II'�,!�Il II'1I{I1I�'{I�I1I��lIjlIf�l j�I�iI��R a(I 1... iIj �!JIfrl'!f{)' __:--.a-_-% EASEMENT TT/ SETBACK LINE UNDERGROUNDTELL FENCE LINE \ --a---til-- Vic,Aq�.cmmnre<e.Mmtr..zs.asrsu ,s.9aa mx m„B .n..a...an UNDERGROUND WS i OVERHEAD UTILITY CADD u icallon. L ` e16\ "nf \• i \\ ..� \ "' \ Y' _ --.. / 1 y j/ ,\ I `\` It e IJ I l l l j �i �� INLET PROTKLION INLET PROTECTION REQUIRED MAINTENANCE: _ j2'j I.WHEN SEDIMENT REACHES 113 THE HEIGHT OF 1 t BASKET DEPTH II MUST BE CL LANED WITHIN 31 HOURS. .�w 11111EyE ].REPAIR OR REPLACE DISFUNCTIONAL INLET PROTECnON J�\\ \\ \ I ; '•{ t r GY1 Oli 1 �I Ij L- I! WITHIN 24 HOURS. 6- 3�.E. r/W .\, �\\ W n mt rc \,-a-'�_ery�J 4 : 4' !µ• - iv I p , u' �-a-c...-'�_ --��,->==-__w=_�1•.. ,--1 co" - - :_ _ -,t,� f� ova,_Lo-q- -- - -___- - ------- --- -_ ----- �- -_--- ----- ----- - - - --- ---- - _ rf: 171 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN AGGREGATE STOCKPILES,DEMOLITION CONCRETE STOCKPILES, TERMINATION(NOT)10 THE MPU.ALL PERMITTEHS)MUST B.INSPECTIONS INDICATE THAT IHf SWPPP IS NOT EfffCTNF SILT FENCE REQUIRED MAINTENANCE: PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION POST SAND STOCKPILES. SUBMIT A NOT WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER ONE OR MORE Of THE AND DISCHARGE IS MELDING WATER QUALITY 1. WHEN SEDIMENT REACHES 1/3 THC HEIGHT 01 SIL,F[NCF IT - (SWPPP) CONSTRUCTION TOL LOWING CONDITIONS HAVE BEEN MET: STANDARDS, MUST BE REMOVED WITHIN 24 HOURS. IMPERVOUSA A: 5.36x. bb3 x. 9.SEDIMENT LADEN WATER MU51 BE DISCHARGED TO A A.FINAL STABLIUTION,PER NPIXS PERMIT PARI W.G.AND C THE BMV•S IN THE SWPPP ARE NOT CONTROLLING Z REPAIR OR REPLACE DYSFUNCTIONAL SET FENCE WITHIN II z. GI NL RAL NOTES: SEDIMENTATION BASIN WHENEVER POSSIBLE If NOT POSSIBLE,, DEFINITION IN APPENDIX B HAS BEEN ACHIEVED ON ALL POLLUTANTS IN DISCHARGES OR 15 NOT CONSISTENT WITH HOURS. SOIL TYPES:SEE SOILS REPORT II MUST BE TREATED WITH THE APPROPRIATE BMP'S, PORTIONS OF THE SITE FOR WHICH THE PERMIITEF IS THE TERMS AND CONDRIONS Of THE PERMIT. 3,SEDIMENT RLMOVEDFROMSURIACEWATERSWI-N]DANS I 1. THE NATURE Of THIS PRgECT Wlll CONSIST Of RESPONSIBLE. 4.SITE C IS INSPECTED AND TRACKED%CEMENT REMOVED = CONSTRUCTING:A INDUSTRIAL STRUCTURE WILL WITH PAVEMENT, POST CONSTRUCTION RUNOFF COEFFKINT:CN-78 10.SOLI)WASTE MUST BE DISPOSED Of PROPERLY AND MUST B. ANOTHER OWNER HAS ASSUMED CONTROL OVER ALL 19.OWNER:CENTERPOINI ENERGY WITHIN24HOURS. - CONSTG,UTNITIfS,ANDSTORMWAU TREWT.. COMPLY WITHIN R DISPOSAL REQUIREMENTS. AREAS Of THE SITE THAT HAVE NOT BEEN FINALLY CONFRACTO21 u 4. THE 1-0-TION Of AREAS HOT TO BE DISTURBED MUST BE STABILIZED. - v Eli gUiZMAN IDEN1Ff RD WITH FIATS,STAKES,SIGNS,LLT ECHO,ETC. ll.ETERNAL WASHING Of CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES MUST BE THE CONTRACTOR STALL OVERSEE THE IMPLLMFNTATIONOf E 2. THE INTENDED SEQUENCING Of MAOR CONSIRUCTION THESWPPPANDSHALL BETHLRESPON518LEPARTYFORALL - ACTIVInfSAREASFOLLOWS: BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS. LIMITED TO A Df FINED AREA Of THE SITE. Ib.A THE IKILI - ' 1. INSTALL STABIII]ED ROCK CONSTRICTION ENTRANCE PAD. A.INIpow- IAIINSI'LCTON FOLLOWING LII FENCE INSTALLATION THE SWK3NS E SITE If THE CONTIA1RESPOI510TY FOR THE - 2. INSTALUTIOILUIDR CK CONSTRUCTION FARWNT LTE. 5. CONSTRUCTION AC.T.'-EROSION PREVEN T TON PRACTICES 12.NO ENGINE DEGREASING IS ALLOWLD ON SITE. BY CITY REPRESENTATIVE I5 REQUIRED. THE,SWPPP THE OWNER SHALL-1 RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE 1. CLEAR AND GRUB FOR TEMPNET ORARY MOMENT BASIN TIME AN ARU UN REMAIN 8. EXPOSED SOIL AREAS:ONCE EVERY 7 DAYS AND WITHIN 24 SWPPP.THE OWNER SHALL BC RESPONSIBLE FOR THE LONG IERM OPEN WHEN NOT ACINEIY II.TME OWNER WHO SIGNS iHf NPIXSPfRMII APPLIUTION ISA _FOLLOWING A 0.5'OVER 24 HOURS RAIN EVENT. OPERATION b MAINTAINABLE Of THE SfDIMLNTATIONDETENTION a 4. CONSCON! TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION BASIN. BEING WORKED TYPE Of SLOPE PERMITTEE AND IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLIANCE WITH ALL C STABILRED AREAS:ONCE EVERY 30 DAYS BASIN AND ROME SEWER ON SITE.THE CIXJTRACTOR SHALT WL ORrE Ydm 5.RAMP CONSTRUCTION MAY BEGIN. DAYS ST EPE-T R1HAti 3:1 TERMS AND CONDITIONS 0f THE PERMIT.THE OPERATOR D.FROZENGROUNMASSOONASRUNOFf OCCURSORPRIOR PROVIDEDGKOMENTATKXJCOWLYINGWIIHTHf L State Q STRIPANDSTOCK'ILLTOPSOIL. 7DAYS 10:1 T03:1 (CONTRACTOR)WHO SONS THE NPOES PERMIT APPLICATION 6 TO RESUMING CONSTRUCTION. REQUIREMENTS AS STATED IN PART III OF THE NPDFS PERMIT. Gopher State One Call _Tmra03- 7 g ]. ROUGH GRADING IX SITE. ]DAYS FLATTER THAN 10:1 A PERMITTEE FOR PARTS II.b,PARI RC ANO PART N.Of THE ® mnT;oa lUv.T7rrs q 8. STABILIZE DENUDED AREAS AND STOCKPILES NPDES PERMIT AND I5IOINT1Y RESPONSIBLE WITH THE OWNER 17.OWNER MUST KffP RECORDS OF AL1 PERMITS REQUIRED FOR 20. BMP TABUXAIION: Twat EIRE'-0.00�IssxilY 9. INSTALL UTILITIES ON SITE. ®DENOTES SLOPES SLEEPER THAN 3:, EOR COMPLANCf WITH THOSE PORTT)NSIX THE PfRMII. THE PRgECT, ALL INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE SIIcel Tale. TO.INSTALL STAGE 251 LI FENCE AROUND STRUCTURES. PERMANENT OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS, SLI FENCE 1,000 LF EROSION CONTROL 11.REMOVE ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT FROM BASIN. b. ON SLOPES 3:1 OR GREATER MAINTAIN SHEET FLOW AND 14.CHANGt OH COVERAGE-UPON COMPLETION Of GRADING, AND REQUIRED CALCULATIONS FOR TEMPORARY AND ROUX ENTRANCE PALO-2EAPLAN 12.INSTALL REMAINED OF UTILITIES ANO%W IS. MINIMIZE RILLS AND/OR GULLIES,SLOPE LENGTHS CAN HOT BE UTILIIFS,AND STREET CONSTRUCTION THE NEW OWNER PERMANENT STORM WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS.THESE RCD/MULCH-12 AC WARNING: R13.IWALL SILT KINE AROUND STRUCTURES GREATER THAN]S FEEL. IHHDMI BUILDER)MUST SUBMIT A SUBDIVISION REGISTRATION RECORDS MUST BE RETAINED FOR THREE YEARS.RECORDS 10 SWPP MAINTENANCE-T EA 14.SU-1 PAVEMENT AREAS,INSTALL PAVEMENT SECTION. WIIHIN)DAYSOLASSUUMMII A RAE-ESIOIIONAI ONTROLIX THE INCLUDE:DATEb IIMLIX INSPECTION,NAMEIX INSPECTOR. THE CONTRACIORSIWL K RESPONSIBIL FOR UILING EOR LOUTIONSOL ALL 15 INSTALL CURB AND GUTTER. 7, ALL STORM DRAINS AND INLETS MUST BL PROTECTED UNTIL SITL,COMMfNCINGWORKON THEIRPORTKONOF THE SITE,OR FINDINGS b RECOMMENDAIION5 Of CORRECTIVE ACTIONS, 21, 1 HE FOLLOWING ENDIVE IXlALS MUST 81 TRAINED IN E%611NGU1811RR.THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN 16.BTUMINOLe CIN PAVEMENT AREAS. ALL SOURCES OF POTENTIAL DISCHARGE ARF STABILIZED. IXTHE LEWLTRANSfER SALE OR CLOSING ON iH[PROPfRTY. DATE b AMOUN T OF RAINFALL EVENTS GREAIER THAN 01 IN ACCORDANCE WITH IN[NPOFS PERMIT REQUIREMENTS:THE MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND/OR RELOCATION OF SIRES, I B.WH GRACE BOULEVARD TIONSACTISEED AND MULCH. NOTE: THE NEW CAN IMPLEMENT THE ORIGINAL 5- 24 HOURS, INDIVIDUAL WHOPREPARBfHESWPPP;THEINDNIDUAL IB.WHEN All CONSTRICTION ACTIVITY IS COMPLETE AND 8. TEMPORARY SOIL STOCKPILES MUST HAVE EFTECTIVL SfEKMENI CREATED fOR THE PRORCI OR DIILLOP AND IMREMINT OVERSEEING THE IMPLEMENTAION,REVISING,b AMENDING THE AT LEART HOURS IALLCONIKIGOPE L-IONS GALL UN J51-0WI ,1,IA ry THE LTL 15 STABILIZED,REMOVE SILL HENCE AND RESEED CONTROL AND CAN NOT BE PLACED IN SURFACE WATERS OR IHEIROWNSWPPP. I. SWPP .LET AMENDED WHEN: SS\NPP;THLINDIVIWALISIPERFORMINGORSUPERVISING THE AILFA51 e8 HOURS ADVANCE FOR THE LOGTgISgALL UNDFRGRIXIND P �YYY� ANY ARfA5 DISTURBED BY iHf REMOVAL A.THERE IS A CHANGE IN DESIGN, OPIRATION, INSTALLATION,MAINTENANCE,b REPAIR a THE BMPT. R STORM WATER CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS. WATERS OR WIRES,GBIIS,CONDUITS,PIES,MANHOLLS,VAI 3. SITI DATA: STOCKPILES WITHOUT SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT Of SILT,CLAY, 15.iERMINATON Of COVERAGE_PERMIITUAS) WISHING TO MAINTENANCE, WEATHER OR SEASONAL CONDITIONS ST-U-.LOREDIGONG.\H-TRACIORLIA WNLOnI CF No.: 9 AREA IO BE DISTURBED=9.5x. OR ORGANIC COMPOUNDS ARE EXFMI'i FX: CLEAN iERMINATf COVERSG[ MUST SUBMIT A NOTICE Of THAT MASA LGNIFIGNI fIfEG10N DISCHARGE IHf A80VF.WHEN OAAAQDDIIRING CONSlal1CION AT N0 CO5110 THF GWNH, CCE-2 Z (!jja O`D N `_ s }��1��Ji99F1� G` }3} pT�Z 4 G f C W 4f ^� a {S�,af: - °drS U qo E ami � g dg � �� o o�L•9��F��$i� a }[i c� �IcIcI3IoIoI3IeIcIeI=I�IIaI.I >� 6 U s ® 5 alzlil ❑ 1Qz'¢~3 o ,°�4m< Q 3�p� p ❑ i I I I =i�' x r � � � 6t �Vz .s 7 oF_ z m° E-` E l Tfi "'- m 3 >o :o} W V ba�u o®®Ot=$Salt h I I I I i 5 0 - � '4 �i F <� s��Q izag oWa „rym - F�G~vffio O * I q Jz3 zz i�z 5" ° °5 _og`< z �61u „ Q� i'- zo6„ Q OU d I 1 I W „ 5 << .i.o S�fo n S „� i-o �° uoo 3 � �u%'$u` Y ° Y � :S!W e W p i F „Q ix'rv= .o�Sz '�„ # gdi5<<gm-'j< i'e �'bb i 3'"u �<o fl a Z o g W W g y _ y z W W . 3 _ SQc=" a- s �< Vim& o �8- "W in o 8 Z g r g F s a 3 ° ° $_~ ss -a~<o 3' ~ s 8 —y x a ? z z z 3 i z z ° -oosm~ Ni W�' �mWi W`°F3>� F"W�� O 5 Q S z ` o `� J Y p u i ° ° =., g�� oi `gym Y„ iv 9 g ?F~ g N O> x W a x z tb o o_ y 3N7 bW Sx� x a, ° W x �+ _ W < 4 ' : z F Y s ,x°�&u�du u~LLX -�i`_y ° u,.�x3 z �C W z L as ° Z❑ <. F i _ ° W 3 3 8 ° a 2 W '^ 3°.`W=zYW m°�'- ' R"31e 1� z x F�u�i nr� z `� i r _ in Y 3 z z S i ° „x�Fp y� „z< s?�Slrc o °�i u�x°�OW< ° q ° �pNW W000'< O Ji Y �y v 3 5 0 xW<J ZZS � z� ; vW'^ V< w❑ S ~ W S LL O '-`�u33c� Sz3�ib` 'a;•” ''`� i~~ 61g5� odz H1aON >Z S I Z � 5mo� �S?OL3�8`='_"g�3�go o3�O^ 6g $~�°° � dud �°z< u��x arc„ 3 6 < 4FW ❑ < °9s°9sW3 °LL� °SiL k'3S _ ui�i« �. o ; ~„Fc°c`K�su°�ig��"-'J °.,� stun i1361 ESg8 �rW ~~W `n� i -. T W ~ i� x-z„„ „'~<e:a;_ un.�"W "xx�<W x �z u❑ i 3 <Y°ym ° s°° �� ff=� `�� ° x°" u3 �s "f�so<6m$'zu z z v xo�� =<W6 �mG„W -° off~„ cc ~ : ° x 3�oo3p-W z � -�� Z �« �dg a o° 3S~s< FJW3WKWW„ �„ 3a zg �"~5o9p : 3J z °§ 5.4 J uab»d �� °� ag �� ., ��`< x W g=~, s 3 Via~ € Z o W r d aopQW �.s �� '<3 3Jzm ZfJ~dai3g; W °„E ” V „�3 „ <FFFzi 4�°�4p-u� 4` � W Q Y'u� p" 'z3 Z m - zgt -:�� 08 ° -3! .o<�u�"�z p oG.�z�~ ctt Oi 5 3 3�~0 s Tho ��°s= °°� W6� o°3m �s44='0S 33SSFS s a��€MN �� <?c �R�« s�s<eM°z`3< �� F `3o<5<�Sd <°qSM ''<s E�4s8�m3 ❑ _ m „ m - - - - - - - ', �{'� `C I( � ✓' III II 11 I I II i —_ III II II IIII — III II 7I II II I II I I I I II II ' — I I, II 11 11 II l i ' c s� ., � - -` 111 -:� l' > j � j I.•II I I II II SII I I I IM aNvahaN I I II II _._._(INV 3LA3l-0(V r aloo I y 6 NI.ZL Ol1J3NNOJ y`rA M - NMbH5 yY7 ONV 3NIl;�31VM � I B 1 I t,•5, i , 1001.9 NV H11M j/ 3HL l ADO I — _ _ z'4 c- '• NIVWa31VM.9 I)NLLSIX3 — 9/MNV'Wa3 3H101lD3NNOJ I �I '•t ` 'JNIL51�(301 L?3 NOJ F' Y, I f'ZGB ANINOIU7NNop 6 HDN3a1 3x13 ,;I II II II I II 1 fill 1 II 1 rl tJM dLtSf w• \ 4,', (1361V13 II O 111 I III 1 I SZ9B• I .moo q'r m ,II IIII {-+t '( 111 ` � 9L'LLB ANI %66'l 0 DAd.e-,98 t�•'•1{1E L ItII\Ys 00'ELB ANI ZSLG HW iI II II II I 1 Ir� -' o ZHW SL'LLB ANI I II II I1 1 I I 11 + %0'10dJa.SL-AE II II III II I I 1 S'4L Wlal SS'OLB ANI t R S6f'ZLB ANI 5'LCB-33 I I',ll I1 II 1I 1 1 SL'9LB WIa 35nOH3aVM i; 1I 1 1 1 E HW Z8'OLB ANI I :II II I1 1 1 1 Z9HWBIJ at } , i %E'0• I .III L.AII II i I I Ja.Lz- ra %iB'0• IOZS � ZI I IJ I I { A it III 11 I II Moline 11 11 I I CH t_ -' —•'` , 3H1013nNI.LNOJ %oLis NI.Zl-,9S O1HI73NNOVJWa31 00 I I I 'II 11 11Q1'� 17 90.698 AM O6'OL8A 'u 00"699 ANI HW'%3'- NNOJI LT, %S9'L®JAd ',461 - ; ZZ'ELB lMH S'OLB NMN f ONOd MWA31V _// // / / / // ..�,,� 71 'QZ'OLB ANI / 'QO'ELBWI LL'698ANI Zl HWB S9'ELB WIa lool %r0 d3V.BL-,z9. ZE'69B ANI t 69 5 Sail 11 91533 S6'698 ANI Ala�(/Y6/ Y O/ / %S'oL NJa.Lz-se EL s33 k` SL-L9BANI 130S'699 AN4}+--�� YL S33 I M 1199 AN to ll 3M 1t i oszcB WIa (1IV130`�335151670 ZZ'ELB IMH II 1 II I I S'OLB IMN %YOidJa.LZ•,SE ` 1 ONOd� %Z8'0®3Ad.Vy6Zl i; 1 '� // _../ /'/ •, *'� �.. \} _.�....--'.. I I 1 I 1 II I II I I s'yLeina1 ROAO' A I 1 I I II I II I I %ze'o•�ndH.e AS w- i i i" �1_-.� v A�'�.� i / / OTTANI `1L�+ TidD-fo dOY I I I I 1 II I II '3NII a3M3S DAdt w. �/// G�� P N;a .B M3N HLM HWVS t� '" DNILSIX3011J3NNOJ - 1A� s x 4 sx• u. �. I S I I I WJ Ww6 Gwllwg1tl11°OOtaBMWWL,M Wd CLE SLOLIfiL/tlI G.IWc CenterPoint Energy DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SURVEYED PRELIMNARY PLAT GENERAL NOTES (Per Certifi°ate of Title Number 415776,Hennepin County,Minnesota) SURVEYOR: OINNERA7EVELOPER° Pre%/rlinmalry Plat Ot Warehouse Loucks Associates,Inc. CenterPolnt Energy That part of the Northwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 33,Township 118,Range 21 West of the 5th Principal 72DO He it a;k Lane,Suite 300 P.O.Boa 1374 Meridian lying South of the center line of County Road No.6,also known as Watertown Road and West of the 100 foot right Maple Grove,MN 55330 Houston,TX]7251 of way ITcane Minneapolis.est corner and Southern Railway,the canter line s which right h way Is described as follows: 763-0246505 612J21-5601 GOLDEN VALLEY CENTERPOINT ADDITION Commencing of the Northwest corner of said Section center thence running East on the North line of said Section 33 a Ther-e it 550 feet to on int section with said center line,which point shall be nineideretl as the hue point of beginning. Tnence atter turning°deflection angle of]8 degrees 10 m Hulas to the right,running o °straight line in a Southeasterly DATE OF PREPARATION: direction a distance of 134]feet m or less along said center line to a in wiU the South line of the Northwest February 2015 Ouarter of the Northwest Ouorter of Haid Section 33,distant 815.5 feet mor or Lees,-at from the Southwest corner of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Ouarter of sold Section 33:except that part thereof lying Ncrth of the North line of EXISTING ZONING: Golden Valley Road as described in dead Doc.No.578491 Zone I(Industrial) AREAE: PROPERTY DESCRIPTION NOTES' Lou.Back 1= 566.767 Sq.Ft.or 13.01 Ades Go Valley,MN R.0 W.Golden Valley Road=33.911 Sq.Ft.or 0.78 Acres OI WZ' 1.) The Certifcale of Title includes lana needed to Th,Village of Goltlen Volley per Warranty Dead Document No.539794 TooROLe P ce -Odve= 3800 Sa.Ft.or 0.8 Anes whim eonlaMs°reveroion clause. The Corti/icate of Title also includes land Beetled to The Village of Golden Volley per ° m 606,2995q.FL or 1387 Acres 'ff' Quit Claim Deed Document No.578491 which has a hand written phrase"for street and rood purposes only"inserted. g91 CenteftIfll Energy The land conveyed by said deeds is indicated on the survey. FLOOD ZONEarty,,DESIGNATION: hiThis property,is contained to Zone X(areas determined ro nd outside 0 40 P.O 8oX 1374 2.) There is a portion of Golden Volley Road vacated by Document Nos.867690 and 859667 lying northerly of the current the 0.2%annual chance 6000plain)per Flood Insurance Rate Map, 4 , Houston,TX 77251-1374 road alignment but southerly of the original center line.Hennepin County records appear to indicate that the ownership Community Panel No.2705300351 E.elkdive date of September 2, ttued to the property northerly of the current road of ignment for Golden Valley Road There appears to be anconflict 2004_ SCALE IN FEET in, documentation. NOTE: 3) This srvey was prepared without the benefit of current title work. Easements,appurtenances,and encumbrances may The ei sing laatures and the boundary lntomlatron shown hereon es st n addition to loose shown hereon This survey is subject to revision upon rete pt of°current title insurance was ablainetl by p—aslon ham a drawing prepared by Sunde commitment or attorneys title opnlon. Land Surveying.cated June 4,2014. The propuae!subdivision , layout was prepared by Loucks Associates,Inc. - BENCH MARKS (BM) _ (City of Gold-Valley Bench Marks) 1.) Top of top nut of fire hydrant rear northeast ROAD - ar of mem tank area ,_ PAIL P, � r` Elevation=881.21 feet(N G V.D 1929) 2.) Top of lop nut of fire hydrant near northwest - LI1` ''�11 E comer of main tank area. S Elevation 881.03 feet(NG V.D 1929) ' OO 0 9,YSho M &SRY, ..... .. - -.. - .. ._ - Ro eu one Servw'n: • ASSOCIATES 1. _ • —,a i 40 -A, 7,�•.. I, `/ 0 Su tly I U ora as Lot 1 • g O — e, �a vA - > o Pm Ina Mare: e KD m r•f r I CualierColwo: RLL 71. , i L " Douglas Drive NortbStUr -L11-1 •. ShM Index _ -- — k Na0 L t pw zu _ ' I . i ...y y� f as I — DOUGLAS DRIVE N, - an aero.Cram arvana _v PRELIMINARY 51 (H.0 S.A.H. NO. 102) PLAT T Pro M No.: x 14448 RI Same No, C6-1 s E}ISTNG CenterPoint Energy SURFACE GEOTEXTILE SILT FABRIC Warehouse (IE SPEC. 3886)TO BE PLALACED UNDER CATCH !!!"` BASIN GRATE, WRAPPED COVER: A ' , '! L„ AROUND&STAPLED TO 2 MIN.(UNPAVED AREAS) / �� WOOD 2x4 3 MIN,(PAYED ROADS) F•s '� / f 2 GRANULAR BACKFILL - ��/ 1 F. MN OOT S'EC,3149.20 JY ` Golden Valley,MN —Y<CL c BEoduG -.res i o.•�r, u zRP: o F[CUSENC-15 -^6"VIN: :;MNDOr SPEC.24513 1 �� CenterPoint Ener i_ .r,,i4 FF[ v cu[�c p•c, �r %� �: FOUNOATKKI(TO BE DETERMINED -�/ 2 O 3- 8 a.Es / 35 Fra= P� --ter :�7.�IN FIELD BY CNdNCEA) � + _. -"/ s N[1 F1374 -. on,Box p,Es '� '.`•FIELOVARY SOIL5PRESENT AND HOu510D,TX 77251-1374 aye r•.v ,•o-wa v'eao a.) REFER TO GEOTECHNICAL REPORT I-�—TRENCH N10TH�- FOR PROPER BEDDING AND a t• sur4oaT GEOTEXTILE SILT FABRIC J�WOOD I F..PF.;P --- –-L -- (MNDOT SPEC. 3886) / 2x4 CORRUGATED POLYETHYLENE PIPE C–',7E(/ 1 i (AASHTO M294) - F L NOMINAL P.?E MAXIMUM TRENCH'MO1N T12,NCH Y40 N , .•`i -_fl /- Ii.:EF B1AV1EI DIAMFER COVER (COVERS 10 FT.)(COYER SECTION A—A LUEF (INCHES)__-I_._. (FLET) INCHES) (INDIES) .iz• i zo' -.i._.. 50 so• _._ NOTE: - " ' r1rR A.ev -, BpF - 15' 20 THE CCVTRACTOR SHALL PLACE AND MAINTAIN EROSION CONTROL AROUND —I ,1 CATCH BASINS AS DIRECTED BY -a0• i- 15' ia' no' ENGINEER UNTIL TURF HAS BEEN � ♦ ESTABLISHED 36' 1 15' 78` 128' TER ELAIrM ET 42" 10 ' 84' e SECTION B—B "' 48' i 10' I 91" � I APPROVED FEBRJART 1,200J - - APPROVED FERiWNT 1,2007 INSTALLATION OF GEOTEXTILE CATCHo �allev ey CORRUGATED py{,7li'nallev ^ BASIN FILTER UUVV / J APPROVED MAY I,tom ..a•Wd POLYETHYLENE PIPE + 3 GY-WM-010 ' CITY ENtlNEER PEG 23110 �} GV-EC-050 Gv-EC-070 may„ ��r CITT ENtlVEER PEG 23110 CITY ENGINEER REG 23110 1 RIPRAP AT OUTLETS 1�1J91lAIL i �"ED'� Pro ,al Sary 1 � ASSOCIATES -- --- ---------- ---� aro a11F Atlt0UdNG ISAN.t� vWTSnc.])m MVwC.So]] I _ A� - oxRxFRCWAcuTRA CONCRETE CURB CUT Isc.J]m,avmv]se]s AD.IA,+]w.wmr I ' i i ' ' V- 1 s� wuaa m..ACTIG, � � �, •1 — CONCRETE CURB END SECTION TVP.BITUMINOUS - 1 -- -- PAVEMENT SECTION - ' Co. CURB GUT SITEp2 I SCALE:WA AR+oDAvs TEND SECTION. - - -------— ey 0 ev 11 ` o llev _.. - GY-SM-0SB Gtl-SM-020 � GV-EC-010 ,GRFAG1111 ,Q at C12 EI Q..Iftv C.—L f tm�. FlmsrtmcaaDE I NN]oT snc nn .. v bra—� "T,— ,I L � 1 � ,avomva.riTlf I I i. Ak mD sI T-IGKMR f �°Coed � N rtwIRED ILI ao.cADRxD La.Nstoml - G aar j a v FROM curte wRFACL cwrnc]on I u SECTION A—A sEGPi uv J I HALF EIEVATION i�-, raR NrvmArw,. w,..ncwunens, � � Ee Awa � I �—LwA S I I I jI Shen TR s 6 BATTERED CONCRETE DBIBIIS R 6412 CURB&GUTTER I BBt2 CURB 1.GUTTER CONCRETE PAVEMENT SECTION CONCRETE SIDEWALK i HANDICAP RAMP I SCALE:WA SCALE WA --- SCALE:WA SCALE:WA SCALE:N/A _ __—_._...--.- ___-- Pm I Na.' _J ----- ---__-__ ---_.--- _.l _--------- -- 14448 g C8-1 CenterPoint Energy Warehouse r `.l,- /a 0.m _ vTna 0.NLs TO xW�TOrI —XItfe ;^ 7 e ,E% SFAUxT DR $.sGFK ,RlRA F e�q AsAxfwAc VUtluYSnMR t s ,,-tv, __O ,• a L oE'rAv a0vl-sC,,�:,I•A�flIw�o(lSE�-E-�E , SoI-Bo oi- oFOkofreyoeef Boiy..tmyto - ECrNASnTAix-M-,ss�61E/. :Tr" x�nYr _ Zy eP Golden Valley,M NN. AAsaocp O O O T--/ CenterPoint Energy D P.O Boz 1374 C) — Houston,T%77251-13 74 su'.p 0 0 o U IN 1 ttiros+ A Y�. sArtR-11 FOT A PLAN y # J 'Ijil m..�M.YKF c -c r'3 o r wLos R ,LL N�R•cF.N TnF _, -1T eAtE�iAs� msoeRrla AFm rvloaTF Is To rc 'eFIDW c0.MC vETnELENE. ARODND vs. ! TIE ',LL vOL - - I Ox'r N,. A.R3tOL% 1 !M- KOIE DA4'9 C oEKOIEi SIYP M,CWON1f£MTN ASIY SPE6tGLT1oN l c '-.-I T D II I.. _L_1LL �EUnED.ry YrMCE w F,wl%m o<T c n.va ro nra can ANLIARD DETn L'� STANDARD LET ILS iERYA N L-La Nu x..TEaYA L v STANDARD OR. "P ,pw..'~r, A CATCH BASIN y�l �t1.L,l I TYPICAL HYDRANT i 1 n�ulAT ON c-TA ,suL AT ON otlai. -moi? z Z SEVER MANHOLE T. WEA."YQlle} 71f�'_ '""Y INSTAIUTON z DESIGN K ^-S�•�' J CASTING&COVER OY-ST-010 "aN-WRc-t18 6N-£'-03R PLo ess�oea sen��e,: OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE ELEVATION TABLE OCS NO. A 8 C D E F G H • 15 86].15 86).O 8695 8]3.5 BJ1.5 1Y%1 J• BJ0.5 60' [ASSOCIATES PELOVIDE Y'PIATf WITH LOCKING d•c CUSP 8 Y'PAD T�Ygo�e�iiMNT�sism Illi LOCK HOLE. ®mRs ''Nmm..mm E TOP-r- f EIR CADD u ELEVATL ION - ORIFICE • OPENINGSIZE-F INVERT ELEVATION G WEIR/ORIFICE Is—AILN—L-o Su Im: GALVANIZED CRATE (WLN14•Xe CIPEMNG5 —_ HIGH WATER LEVEL- Ir 4 ME ST AWNHOLL (EMERGENCY OVERFLOW) SECTIONS 48•to n'H E ORIFICE OPENING SIZE-F TOP Of WEIR o INVERT ELEVATION-G ELEVATION SIZE WILL VARY 12•MIN. � OUTLC7 INLET - No— ELEVATION I 6 I INLET A— 13 WATER ELEVATION PRfUST BASE SLAB DOGHOU SHALLBE GROUTED BOTH ON THE INSIDE AND WEIR 10 BL REINFORCED WITH AT OUTSIDE O THE STRUCTURE. LEAST R4 REBAR,Il'ON CENTER OUTLET CONTROL FI—NATE NO, 6 STRUCTURE- 4316 WEIR/ORIFICE RO essiona Si EEL- NVL n cemro: Mm . g 6 y y� Shen IIRNe'� i S 6 Details 9 3 P11 N. g 14448 g CH-2 CenterPoint Energy 0 40 so NOTE: EXISTING CIVIL LEGEND PROPOSED Warehouse EXISTING SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED O SANITARY MANHOLE ^SII o BY SUN LAND SURVEYING CO. ;j s1QRMMA"HOLE Z CATCH BASIN -mm euc w,�B SCALE IN FEET �" } CULVERT Q sym6N 29' M BACC%A.-BRAACCYK. Nw Lw ela v.NwWW'---J}JJ-XXDK%t.-)>]mowp B6mckkkilocmBerxkkmm 3nR RiPoAoN Pok iI]9aa'RI.]JWs. B6'-'--UIl�o41;, HYDRANT it I NXI AT Al.nwm E k 11.1. GgTVE Ms N xx Oala aL-xTCXnMI<I wll MowMu1^_Rm B-'+ POST INDICATOR VALVE FY Q LIGHT POLE Celcvlmm Sunmry .��-{j:. Y POWRPOLE / SIGN neGolden Valley,MN 80' AP=+perry Lim NA _� I ryur BENCHMARK �m - sm Mm �- ,. SOIL BORINGS Qj, CenterPoint Energy WATER MANHOLE . Glmkuw b) 4) TELEPHONE clml.Lm.m Lc ARES P.O Baz 1374 LWN FmH�nw LLC (D UTILITY MANHOLE Houston,T%77]51-1374 ELECTRIC MANHOLE Matldi MlJ ssI SOIBI) •. WATER SERVICE -� SANTARY SERVICE p-p ANDIUPPARKING l DIRECTIONOF FLOW SPOT ELEVATION Y S CONTOURS ..i --?-- SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER H I- WATERMAIN -I- J -RCEMAIN a a a J J J DRAINTRE -»-OT- SILT FENCE CURB&GU�fR R G B1➢➢8 a a J a a a a --_-.___.._- _.-__.-..__--_.._---.-...- _MVWYY< A IV ETALIN TREELINE J > i - ; - iR<D I L' EASEMENT - SETBACK LINE WYWr LINE > W - FENCE LINE UNDERGROUND TELE Professional Se,vlca. UNDERGROUND- -Y-.__-OVERHEAD UTILITY SITE PLAN GENERAL NOTES ASSOCIATES ACM $EIB-RONi BUILDING SETBACK=35FT E+ Pw�<n' �'��. '�` W FRONT BUILDING SETBACK)ACROSS FROM RESIDENTIAL) FT =)S SIDE BUILDING SETBACK MFT.REAR BUILDING SETBACK 20 FT. _ N - S SIDE PARKING SETBACK LOFT. FRONT PARKGSTBACK=35 FT. "de em.eM emm LLLI��JJI 1p I. Ylo�s 7R ; a AJ i`J I I • J } RFARPARKING SETBACK=IMT. '1 1 -ZONING ZONING=HNDUSTRLAL PROPOSED ZONING=1-INDUSIRNL UD -- i Yy J� Z• jff�, PARKING SUMMARY REGUUR TALI$= 169 HANDICAPPED STALLS=6 / \ \ •J > Ey�E11.11 FTE)STALLS DACIENSITY AR TOTAL AREA=11.98 AC.=108% - > IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA=&58 AC. S5=mi11a: BUILDING SURFACE AREA IA7AC-- 7-7 T ? PERVIOUS SURFACE AREA 3.13 AC.=2- I. 4.9%1.All PAVING,CONCRETE CURB,GUTTER AND SIDEWALK SHALL ofN - _12 : h FURNISHED AND INSTALLED INACCORDANCEOF WITH THE TTY DETAILS LA SHOWN <y oPER RFH I I NDSCAPE �L�RICOHS-URALH PLANSUI FOR REQUIREMENTS ADDITIONAL ARDXAPE / ITY DEPARTM I I 1.THE DEPTCAND IHf CONSTRUCTION ENEW Of EGINE R SHALL BE NOTIFIED AT LEAST AND BUILDING I-ECTIONS IF I 48 HOURS PRIORTO ANY WORK WITHIN THE STREET RIGHT Ol WAY )SIDEWALK,ST.",OR DRIVEWAYS) ; -50_0 MIN I 3 UINDENGRO PRIOR 10STATUTE REQUIRES NOTIF GRADIN,E•GOPHER STATE L ONE CALLe RIOR 10 COMMENCING ANY GRADING,EXCAVATION OR WORK > J a J > L ANY SIGN OR FI%TURES REMOVED WITH IN TNf RIGHT OF WAY OR AS yE i PART OF THE SIT,WORK SHALL BE REPLACED BY THE CONTRACTOR IN T3TPt;T1fI ACCORMNCE WITH THE CITY REQUIREMENTS.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL _-_ � 1 i RESERVE AND MAINTAIN ANY EXISTING STREET LIGHTS AND TRAFFIC ---- $ SIGNS PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. �\ S.CLEAR AND GRUB AND REMOVE ALL TREES,VEGETATION AND SITE DEBRIS CENTERPOINT ENERGY - I PRIOR TO GRADING.ND ALL REMOVED MATERLALSHALT HAULEDFROM THE 511E DAILY AND DISPOSED OF PROVALSSHLY IBE PERFORMED OFFICE/WAREHOUSE o i I THUARINGANOGRUBBING AND REMOVAL55ALL BE PERFORMED PER I THE CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS.EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY ESTABLISHED UPON REMOVAL.IMF SHEET C341 6.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REQUIRED TO OBTAIN ALL PERMITS FROM RGHT OF WARfYQU1RED FOR ALL WORK WITH THE STREET AND PUBLIC I PROPOSED REA IGNMENT I ).ASIGNIFICANi SORTIGNL UIEDAFSITEIMPROVEMENTS URT"IRTSHOWN ETARON ON'HIS Pmersiona SInature: PROPOSEN EA AGN ENT ' SHEEITECTUR IA 0LANOPROVILANS,THIS INCIUETAILODscA vMrms =e.a OF EY OTHERS I I ARCHINGAN At AND UNDXAP[PUNS.TMIS INCLUDES IANDSUPING, LIGHTING AND OTHER FIXTURES. &8611 CONCRETE CUM AND GUTTER SHALL BE INSTALLED AT THE EDGE OF sm M ALL COMMON DRNFS AND PARIING LOTS.THE CURB SALL BE IAPRED AND DROPPEDACROSSINDIVIDUALORNfWAYINTRANCE5. v«kvan Uai PF . n m / n ✓ I I 9.CONSTRUCTION NOTES: ... -_ -.. Liaaev vo. on. PfDfSTWAN RAMP55HALl8f ROVNIED AT IHf LOCATION55HOWN AND --- -- ---- -- - --- - ---- -- -- --- • - AS SHOWN PER THE CIVIL DETAILS. alt on8o: /I - - THECONTRACFOR SHALL SAW--BITUMINOUS AND CONCRETE L PAVEMENTS AS SHOWNON TM[PIANS.RfMOV[E%pSTING CURB AND GUTTER AND INSTALL 0614 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER. �- -- - - - �- ,7. �� - --1-' -- - IO.ME SHEETS C3-1 AND-FORGRADINGAND UTILITIES. 5 ll L - IAN _ , PROPOSED REALIGNMENT a \�j Y OF DOUGLAS DRIVE N BY OTHERS �� Gopher State One Call w :a: 1�•T it ' MLE.51 pIm Sh T e PRELIMINARY i1 WARNING: PHOTOMETRICS THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOK-NG FOR LOCATIONS Of ALL PLAN 3 \, \\�\ \ U51INGUTLIT-IHLYSHALCOOPERATEVAIHAL UILUYCOMPANIFSIN \ MAI NTMNING IHERt SERVXE AND/OR WLOCAIION OE LNE5. IP-N. THE CON TRACTORALLCONT SACTCAPHERSTATEONE CALL AT651Js4- .'. ATLEAS-HOURSINADVANCEFORTRLOCATIONSQALLUNDERGROUND 14448 ST UUClu IS ILEFORE o1GCNNG.SiHECONTR� GR SFwJ Rf CR RE-ENo: T��VE WHIN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTIONA NO COSI 101.E \. Pi-1 Pr r N— y.,y_ [ SIGNIFICANT TREES: CenterPoint Energy O ? R '"`- _ TREE 8 SPECIES DIAM/HT FORM DISPOSITION � qD �;c��- _ - �- . —='' Warehouse INE RAI - - - }, '"!: •'AR' \ I PINE 30'HE SINGLE REMOVED I y.[-Y-"'-:.::. ,� _ 2 PINE 7U'HT SINGLE SAVED �OO _ -✓, i-J a• •�• 'j ,,,..•-•-"�\- 3 ASH 18• SINGLE REMOVED E - -i -- •"'�'� -- b� 4 ASH 14' SINGLE REMOVED j s ASH 17° SINGLE REMOVED G ASH 17' SINGLE REMOVED t + *. 7 ASH 15• SINGLE REMOVED / ' r ' MERLAA iqe 5£'�'~ /► i 'ITDa INOBs i I / 8 ASH 18" SINGLE SAVED gOUNd* b pl 1;1 2 t 9 MAPLE t 7• sINOLE snvEO Golden Valley,MN 3 H 17- SINGLE SAVED J MIt ( - 2 I/ MAPLE 17' SINGLE SAVED ( QanaA er Name: z::r tT ,.� _ _ _ tea" �! .++• t i ,\ CenteAomt Energy .,� 1 ! j 12 ASH 17• SINGLE SAVED _ _ _ 11��(I 5 7 �-�y'TyLT .: 73 MAPLE 22• SINGLE SAVED neE -' ` ''!\4 6 2. 14 ASH 17• SINGLE SAVED Owe ,t `� 15 MAPLE 24" SINGLE SAVED P.O eo%1374 HwslOn,TX 77251 7374 :- �' -.c: :..r ..rS.£t;.' _ _ ! re_'._ _ x� \'✓' $ F� e...— .__..� . ••,1 16 ASH 17' ANGLE SAVED `r REMOVED -4- "'K a--rte-., .l' L.� .. -s`� a•. ___ /�'L� 18 MAPLE 14• ANGLE SAVED :jrt �^ Ye •'ii,\\ is 19 ASH /7• ANGLE SAVED }1- t R A v E Lc / g' ,� 20 MAPLE 17' SINGLE SAVED / `L / / 21 ASH 77• ANGLE SAVED (��.a(j� \�.•� ,\\ 22 MAPLE 17• SINGLE SAVED -3TfE![ ry4Q` �'\ \\\\..,.,.\ •`t_. c R A s s ; •/ .. \ / / / {''1 .•� ` \ �• /, 23 ASH 17• SINGLE SAVED J \ 4\\\\ \ s 4 ` a 3 \t 24 MAPLE SINGLE SAVED 1 \ 4Q ! „ .'\� ,3 l; i � e �, 1 25 ASH 17' SINGLE snvEO 4 \ `I ] c \ ; } ! ! 26 MAPLE 17• ANGLE REMOVED O 27 ASH 19' SINGLE SAVED _ / I .-F;.'•' .,K 11}1 _. - ! !�I 1 E, 28 ASH 14ANGLE REMOVED 2 I. �+ 19 ASH 1N ANGLE REMOVED •� t 1s1- I, Ill!'1 I f Ty 30 MAPLE 23' ANGLE REMOVED 43 G 1 it E;t II; 4 ! /`• -• r•,.B N.. ...__ 1 ; , ` �;M 4l1ug; I I 1 t.y 31 ASH 16' SINGLE REMOVED 4 P {� 11a'1 4 I1,! 1 f p 1 �' 32 MAPLE 12• SINGLE REMOVED `'\ _ A, \ ASN x�v37 °� - j If 6`"'�liljil!"� mrv' 33 MAPLE 18• SINGLE REMOVED \, �! {`:,;\`� 2 loA 33 /•36 �1t1 gg �1! I i,`1'i'iui u: �a,•,.'\ \ ° I\ i\ •+ 32 �--\ 34 \i 11t1 3. I I 34 ASH 75• SINGLE REMOVED i 35 ASH 15' ANGLE REMOVED 3� - `r46 48¢ \- - \', 30 31 ' -'\ ! 11'1 / I .. _ ' ! 4 3G ASH 20' SINGLE REMOVED / •--„ `\ \ '` ` i , f R I -!1 i s;f 37 ASH 11' SINGLE REMOVED i e ,,\ 11 11 I •• 1 38 PINE 30'HT SINGLE REMOVED /1 /' r /, �•_ 'Y"1O it ` s/ _ -_._ .r-`_.____ '' et1 ,` ` i p �•��i�:'..IiK..+ K ..A 39 PINE 40'HT SINGLE REMOVED U a .. ! t q� }r}rµirt� 0 \_ /.`-�; t /-\` ��\,` T... \`'`; `` \ \\• `• 1 L".. \I !� ` - 1 ii j !" 1 ' j aO 40 PINE 40-HE SINGLE REMOVED SSOCIATE ' '•.,,`.. `'`F1`� �\ _--•`'�� .. 1 •1 ( '1 f 0. !•j 41 BRUCE 30'HT ANGLE REMOVED A _ •�,.s\ 1 i 5S \ \;i Sij-il I" 42 SPRUCE 30'HT SINGLE REMOVED 1,!i. i Y;i ./ ',(\ l•^-. \ �I.t'.\ ;`�' ' 1T1 I V I !. F j. 1�\� \ �'�\ tRAss\ ` \ 1 1t ;1=jIllifl+ 1 13 SPRUCE 30'HT SINGLE REMOVED \ �\ �' PO G IPI} 1 :I.. Ii Ij `•! 44 SPRUCE 30'HT SINGLE REMOVED '�F"'Aw �!, ?a�'1� !- ! =1' 45 CEDAR 30'HT SINGLE REMOVED qc'^••m"% .�;:rj� , n.pa„a L:.-ssne a1e,y I E� �'\ \ �: 7 •� I +' 1 1 q ss' '3".;'1t.1 �� .[ 46 SPRUCE 40'HT SINGLE REMOVED \ \\ W;. W �•{ \\ > i� / {E Il.;a jit;1Fii€1:I i 53, lj I Iil3' 47 SPRUCE 40'HT ANGLE REMOVED '\ 48 SPRUCE 40'HT ANGLE REMOVED CARD aific— \, i �� I .{ `\ \` ` \. _-ALJ .��/ Yl, t i V !m \ � , ``• / '�'�... I I � Ei:I Ijl ; � 49 SPRUCE 40'HT SINQE REMOVED Rri�� __ . ,`II !'f II�It ! ' z.. I 50 ASH 11' SINGLE REMOVED 57 ASH 10' SINGLE REMOVED \ .,, Evu� i 1, t 36• SINQE REMOVED -A L _ -. �.� \\\\ \\\t :t '1 1 _ .. a I I �. /' \ �)lr�� ±Iil ,/• 1 53 HACKBERRY 40'HT SINGLE REMOVED e.... ..\ \ G R A s ` 'l-•� 6 i ,._.. - �,.�� / '• f: / i7 // ! I I I I ( 130'HT ..... �~ 0 R A VE L s4 CEDAR 30'Hi SINGLE REMOVED owcnm N� 55 PINE 40'HT SINGLE REMOVED 5ul,maa F \ \"�~'' / I�I:• II tb 1 56 SPRUCE 40'HT SINGLE REMOVED I i : * {y( i 4':;!1!i L i I 57 CEDAR 30'HT ANGLE REMOVED ....�i:. A✓ �' ' , I I f i i .aw.� }M' rl'' !. i!i)j 1 i I — ti f• GRAVEL. I Etli III 7i-:•'::: _\!. ` { i 1 t 58 PINE s0'HT ANGLE REMOVED f j�� - i 7 I '`- + ! I I!1 1 •• f j 59 PINE 40'HT ANGLE REMOVED _ ' .3°If"0 ) I t s R A s s 1 \, I I If 5 r�' rf. ! 1 { 60 SPRUCE 40'HE ANGLE REMOVED — r \ �/- %"{• I ( \e s-�. / \ \\ III P I /' / •�'4 61 1 \. 1 ( ��,e„-j% I ` \'g,. _'�!!j ` ' � 'i f 61 CRAB IG' SINGLE REMOVED _ �'-c\,! .r, 6i 62 CRAB 10' SINGLE REMOVED 64 t i —' ,� J / gy _fit--+ 63 PINE 30'HT SINGLE REMOVED 66 ! '4 � 61 CEDAR 40'HT SINGLE REMOVED PINE�� I 65 NE 40'HT SINGLE REMOVED � •, { �' � �~ .,� 65 •� � /�� , /='` I / ID D, t'i I I 66 CEDAR 30'HT SINGLE REMOVED _ T ° '• 67 SPRUCE 40'HT SINGE REMOVED � ,�! ____.._.........____........_ .—_-,.,.. _-__.___.__._._...._ t_._ I _` - 7A. i•,'\ 68 CEDAR 30'HT ANGLE REMOVED !, 6& J-�P4�.F} i( 72 78j 80.81' '82'83 8h aNN + `i 11 •, ` F \ /I '. I.M. 73 74 75 76 I f 7\ X-1.1 - �7{ �� 69 SPRUCE 40'HT ANGLE REMOVED Z +•`\' 1,,a 1`I� l— 6��\ r i i'i rE i 'Q $'I 70 COTTONW OD 30• SINQE REMOVED 71 CEDAR 30'HT SINGLE REMOVED 72 ASH 1/' SINGLE REMOVED -•Y .` . _ _` _�_ / O _ _________.- ___ -Ate.__.._.__-•^� i �_-_ ___ _,- (a 73 PINE 30'HT SINGLE REMOVED ---�' \” "-esi u u I R o u s �,•,, - .-T. _.." EtErE of wr I 74 CEDAR 30'HT SINGLE REMOVED D UGLAS DRIVE N,.4= \-'ti` !9' onAVO- i"- Eli' 75 ASH 16' SINGLE REMOVED .. < _ 76 ASH 8" TRIBE REMOVED \-{'H..(_S.A.H. NO.-lD2) R I T D a�-o�t5„ "�'..__:.,. 77 SPRUCE 30'HE SINGLE REMOVED - 78 PINE 30'HT SINGLE REMOVED 79 PINE 40'HT SINGLE REMOVED Prdessfonal si a TREE INVENTORY PLAN: 80 CEDAR 10'HT SINGLE REMOVED LEGEND: TREE INVENTORY SUMMARY: 0 40 80 81 CEDAR 30'HT SINGLE REMOVED .'+�!y�� -a^ nF[EROnCTpN Non: 81 SPRUCE 201 HE SINGLE REMOVED IxsrulR(AIII.EERauNouana rowEsonamrwoRrouraNG ToxESNUEwR.aoaENE tMl EOCFaOIITKURWE SEE SHEET LI-1 FOR TREE REFORESTATION PLAN sllla 83 CRAB 7(` SINGLE REMOVED �• +� zoaua 11f lill S fENOnGsuu'E M)ooRR EHW Pro EIE T-0l un EPs tow wOEFE.TFD M R«ERn%swRnEEs'uNc84 rwrEcnovuuwt%slGNnrtD.r NE nrnEsl%nlNccoranun%%+.'nMn'Wosir+++cE VI+OwINssuuo+r ruraE rrtonrnoN SCALE IN FEET SPRUCE 40'HT SINGLE REMOVED a«+f Env NSnVCISWORkiR5105E+��ur.Cd11R.CTORSHLLL SVORI LLLARWNIMNTHF wDIFCI%lN nNf£Shc'fA)IIIDw m11w ww CONSTRUCTION GRADING LIMITS ALLOWABLE CATEGARvB P«IIECnOER(MIEROSION M'OM4lLf51NO[WS1Er—coI0.rTMIOIXMvfR455UCN AS EURS SuOPVNES TREE REPLACEMENT INECOMRECTURSNVINSv'10.[FPVNI.ON'In+T ALL1WSR WOWISMWEOm011YlNLf9NSE%UCERXI EHFCIXfEEYTOR MJST3 TREES REMOVAL TREESTOBE TREES a Camro: INNEwaur,mrPwrraTNFwa m«oPExRTorwvEmo«wnr.wFovA.cEroTwFSTowPconrnosNnlwexwunroTfR SIGNIFICANT TREE TO BE REMOVED SIGNIFICANT TREES-EXISTING ON-SITE SAVED REMOVED (30%) MITIGATED REQUIRED unNEroNa TNEarrxu+oEuaosc..vE ulomwE. —�� •� �18 CONIFEROUS,24 FEET OR HIGHER 39 1 38 23 92 SIGNIFICANT TREE TO BE RETAINED/PROTECTED HARDWOOD DECIDUOUS,6'T020 EXAM 40 lG 24 S 30 � a I �E%¢n«G TREE TOREAWw SEE 1/Ll-0 SOFTWOHARDWOD oD DECIDUOUS,REATER THAN rDIAM 1 2 1 — SOFTWOOD DECIDUOUS,GREATER THAN II' 1 1 1 I SPECIMEN TREE I I I 7 6 = p I I �DRw EDGfanFE TOTALS 18/ 1 19 1 65 1 25 40 132 — bAL_nL— ' I T%4•WOOD STAKE,POSRIONED AO —_ —1-1S NE I—R�+L "F g ETTING BE—WOOD STAMS D S'ONQNTER AND RACED ShF fill, TLIIllR PROTECTION AND DIS -ABED E%511NG GRADE Tree Inventory Plan PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Na.: 2 TREE PROTECTION 14448 L1-0 IYti CenterPolnt Energy Warehouse NE RAIL Soo Golden Valley,MN �~ •1 -t"t"r�''~ S _ __ :.rte F 'i rt _xL° `\ CenterPoint Energy P.O Boa 1374 H--,,,EX 77251 1374 R , It 0 - _- z — / A�4 1 4 :) _ _ ........ r ' • v v _ (`t •I £ ^ q �t ' `U U U 7 s P SRA,' It ASSOCIATES �` fit Y;\ f` \\\ \ \ = \\�� l -� {;i R f•. m� , L 'Y...,u;a ! i ♦ \ \i Pi'i 1 !E IE rl —_`� ;, ! aql --..___..,_.�.:_—...,._ .--< I i ilt 1 1+ I ±N,: ...� CADo Q-ii—iln L= f Will at �O \� \\ '1 rd•�� --5z ._`-aJ-- / '''- III f I \ n h. s i,L ' _ .,f `i It rl Inl� ( v Z c r UUUU �U`U ,` III iwf l I O �' ,t\ ♦ \ L' J: —.. ,.�--'--�+."'" t%ll,fi.l Z i Sum i =" l t i ; / is � � I`�,_..-•`+� :�` �I'`I : �. — ..r \X, L IN `_ —_. :^ ,n....., <-...--:..� 3ru :—.. .:: '•+':: «.-fir'.:.-_ _ - '�l;i- __ '' _ a1IIIIZ \ .r R� IVE ; . SCALE IN FEET TREE REFORESTATION PUN: GENERAL NOTES: LANDSCAPE INSTALLATION NOTES: REPLACEMENT TREE LIST-132 CATAGORY B TREES REQUIRED P�a�iwlSl•rNl°re: KEY QTY COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME SIZE COMMENTS as.�au " 1.COORDINATE TH 1.CONTRACTOR SHALL VISIT SITE PRIOR TO SUBMITTING BID.HE SHALL INSPECT SITE AND BECOME PHASES ASES OF coN51RECTION AND PLANTING INSTALLATION WITH OTHER CONTRACTORS WORKING CMI SITE DECIDUOUS TREES FAMILIAR WITH EXISTING CONDITIONS RELATING TO THE NATURE AND SCOPE CIF WORK. 2.NO PLANTING WILL BE INSTALLED UNTIL COMPLETE GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA. CL 15 GREENSPIRF INDEN Tilia canlala'Grcenspire' 2-1/2"ULB.B. A Z.VERIFY LAYOUT AND ANY DIMENSIONSSF/OWNAND BRING TO THE ATTENTION OF THE 6.ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALLCIX.W/YWItMTH[UTFSI EDITION OF IfIE M1ERKM1$TANDMDFOILNURSERYSTOCKAMERK.WA550CIATIONOFNUMRYWN.SIREETANDBOULEVMD TREESSWLLLBEGINBRANCHINGHOL-11 EHAN RL 70 REDMOND LINDEN Tiliaa io 'RWmmd' 2-1/2"CAL B.B. ° LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT ANY DISCREPANCIES WHICH MAY COMPROMISE THE DESIGN AND/OR INTENT WABOVE FINISHED GRADE AB 15 AUTUMN BI MAAZE MAPLE Acer a ixce 'F i'kirersred' 2-1/2"CAL B.B. OF THE PROIECT'S LAYOUT. T ANY CONIFEROUS TREE PREVIOUSLY PRUNED FOR CHRISTMAS TREE SALES SHALL NOT BE USED.ALL CONIFEROUS TREES SHALL BE FULL FORMNATUTAL TO THE SPECIES.WITHOUT PRUNING RS 13 NORTHERN MAPA Acer rulm flip-nkued' 2.1/2"CAL B.B. ulil C°nu°: PO 77 NORTHERN PIN OAK (�(cHs elli soidalis 2412-CAL B.B. 3.ASSURE COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE WORK B.PLAN TAKES PRECEDENCE OVER PUNT SCHEDULE B DISCREPANCIES IN QUANTITIES EXIST.SPECRIUTIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER NOTES CH 19 COMMONHACKBERRY -1.,—kii.—Im 2-1/1'CAL B.B. OR MATERIALS SUPPLIED. 9.ALL PROPOSED PLANTS SHALL BE LOCATED AND STAKED A5 SHOWN IXN PLAN.ALL TREES ARE REQUIRED TO BE SEAMED WITH 2 STARES SPACED EQUALLY AROUND THE I0.EF5. IH 7 IMPERIAL HONEYLOCUST Gledilsia BiacarILlltx inermis'I mle' 2-1 "GL B.B. -�—4.CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL EXISTING ROADS,CURBS/GUTTERS.TRAILS,TREES,LAWNS AND TO.NO PLANT MATERIAL SUBSTITUTONS WILL BE ACCIPT[D UNLESS APPROVAL IS REQUESTED OF THE GWn,GA,ARCHITECT BY THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO THE SUBMISSION OF A BID AHDOR QUOTATION. `' SITE ELEMENTS TO REMAIN DURING PLANTING OPERATIONS.ANY DAMAGE TO SAME SHALL BE CONIFEROUS TREES = REPAIRED AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. 11.ADJUSTMENTS IN LOCATION OT PROPOSED PLANT MAIDEALS MAY BE NEEDED IN FIELD,SHOULD AN ADJUSTMENT BE ADVISED.THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MUST BE NOTIFIED, BH 23 BLACK HID!SPRUCE Picea Ria Uca den ITT 6'NT S.CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALIGNMENT AND LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND AND ABOVE 12.ALL RANT MATERIALS SIULLBE FERIILQED UPON INSIALLATONWITH DRIED BONF MEAL,0IHER APPROVED FERTIEDER MIXED INWITH THE PLANTING SOIL RR THE MANUFACTURERS ENSTRLIC—SOR MAY BE TREATED FOR SUMMER AP 13 AUSTRIAN PINE PiIBIs nigra 6'HE = GRADE UTILITIES AND PROVIDE THE NECESSARY PROTECTION FOR SAME BEFORE CONSTRUCTION/ AND FALL INSIALLA(ON WITH AN APPLICATION GGRANULAR O26200F 1202 PER 2.5'ULIRR PER TREE AND 60Z RRSHRUB WITH AN ADDITIONAL AR,KAIION OF 1610.10IHE FOIIOWING SPRING IN THE TREE SAUCER SI SI u MATERIAL INSTALLATION BEGINS(MINIMUM 10'.0-CLEARANCE). 14.ALL PUNTS TO BE TNSTALLED AS KI PIANTONC DETAILS. 6.ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHALL BE LAID SO THAT TRENCHES DO NOT CUT THROUGH ROOT IS.WRAPPING MATERIAL SHALL BE CORRUGTto PVC MING I-GREAT ER IN CALIPLR THAN THE TREE BEING PROTECTED OR QUALITY,HLAW,WAIERPROOf CRER PARER MANIXACURED FOR THIS PIMFIOSE WRAP ALLOKIDUWSTREES p-u`t m5 �a�nnv SYSTEM$CIF ANY EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN. RANIED IN THE FALL PRIOR TO 12-1 ANO REMOVE ML WRAPPING AFTER S-1. 3 Lb.ALL TREES NOT WITHIN RANTING BEDS TO RECEIVE 4-DEEP SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH WITH NO MULO M DIRECT CONTAC WITH TREE TRUNK yr_,a[arou,r,ruv nw 7.EXISTING CONTOURS,TRAILS,VEGETATION,CURBIGUTTER AND OTHER EXISTING ELEMENTS BASED ,+xN g UPON INFORMATION SUPPLIED TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT BY OTHERS.CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY 20.IF THE LANDX CONTRACTOR ISCONCERNED OR RROMS ANY DEFOENCIFS IN 111E RANT SELECTIONS,""CONDITIONS OR ANY OTHER LTE CON DITON WHICH MIGHT NEGATNELY AFFECTPUNi ESTABLISHMENT,SURVIVAL OR y ANY AND ALL DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT ETF GUARANTEE,HE MUST BRING THESE DEFICIENCIES TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT KUGF TO PROCUREMENT AND/OR INS—LATION. ITMJs. o y SAME. 21.CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMT A WRITTEN REQUEST FOR THE OWNER ACCEPTANCE INSPECTION OF ALL LANDSCAPE AND SITE V.TrlR0VEMENTS. y' 22.CONIRACIGLrSRESPONSIBLEFORON-C/JINGMAINTENANCEOfALLNEWLYINSTALLEDMATERIABUNIKTHEOTOWNERACCEPTANCEANYACT50 VANDALISMORDAMAGEWHICHARMYOCCLWMMTOOWNERA WtANCE PRELIMINARY � I A /� �/ Tree Reforestation Plan F� SH&L BE TH[RESPONLBn IIYOF FNECONT RACTOR.CONTRAC IOR SMALL PROND[THE OWNER WITH A MAINE[NANCE PROGREAl'—LUDING BUT NO(NKF55ARILY LIMITED IO,PRIMING,FFRIILIUIION AND DISLAS[NESI CONTROL r RELIMINAR I 3 24.WARRANTY TONE FULL GROWING SLASONI FCML UNDSGNE MATERIALS L1ALL BEGIN ON IH[DATE OFACGPIANCf BY THE LANDSCAPEARCHnEC MY,. AFTER TN[COETION OF RANTING OF ALL UNDSCAR MAIERMIS.NOPARTIAL C ACGPIANME or CONSIDERED. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION -i-IN°.: 26.ITE APPROPRIATE DAZES FOR SPRING PUNT MAIEiIAI.INSTALLATION AND SOD PLAC[MENI IS FROM HIE TIME GROUND HAS THAWED 70 RINE I5.FML SODDING B GENERALLY ACCEPTABLE FROMAUGUSI 15-NOVEMBER 1.FALL 14448 GONRERQUS PLANTING MAY OCCUR FROM AUGUST IS-OCTOBER 1 AND FALL DECIDUEXIS PLANTING FROM THE FIRST FROST UNTIL NOVEMBER 15.RANTING W TLD[THESE DALES 15 HOT R(Cb.V.ICNDED.ANY ADIUSIM[NI MUST BE R APPROVED N WRITING BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCW TELT. Stacl N°.: 27,LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL EST:ABUSH TO HIS SSI ACJONTHAI"LAND COMPACTION CONDITIONS ARE ADEQUATE TO ALLOW FOR PROPLK DRAINAGE AT AND AROUND TINE BUILDING LTE. L1-1 B 8 I E f G H 3 TT 1 ! OPUS* THE OPUS GROUP PREFINSHED METAL COPING p D PRECAST CONCRETE P ELS w/ PLANTED PRECAST CONCRETE PANELS RE SED AREAS 8 REVEALS Opus AE Group,L.L.C. w/RIBBED FINISH I 10350 Bran Road WM E 1�4 _ I /�PREFlNISHED METAL COPING PREFINISHED METAL COPING *T 01�� 952-1%-- E 1%-9SW-0110 n T.O WALL :.1 �L/ 134'-4' 128'-8' •L/ I I I h �TO.WALL TOpus Design Build,L.L.C. _4'1iO., ni O.WALL T.O.WALL _ - - - ONE cI I - -- ` - L. �—t—y _L 173' 8' 7'�II I F NORTH ELEVATION GAS REGULATOR BLDG. 2 7 SOUTH H EVLEV SIN.REV. SGLLE BL ,]NbULTa1T i __. 100•-0" LINE F�LINE FL PAINTED PRECAST CONCRETE PANELS PREFINISHED METAL CANOPY PAINTED PRECAST CONCRETE PANELS w/RIBBED FINISH w/RIBBED FINISH SOUTHEAST ELEVATION 2 NORTHEAST ELEVATION SCALE 1/16•- 1'-0• SCALE 1/16• r *1 12•_4" T.O.WALL ' I g _ H G F E ' D.1 C.4 B.7 B A vRaecr S PANTED PRECAST CONCRETE PANE w/ CenterPoint EAST ELEVATION(GAS REGULATOR BLDG. PaNTED STUCCO(EI ) atEAs REVEAL Energy w 1,PREFl HED METAL COPING 0 8 WEST ELEVATION SIM.REV. SCALE 1/16•- 1'-0" ...... ....... ...... .._. ...... .._. _....._... 131'-0• 728'-B' v *T.O.WALL tDGnDN � : - Douglas Drive N Rill- PRWECT uuluGolden Valley,MN Y TNE eR L I �113'O B' m 7 1 I r I I j t00' D, ISSUE RECORD I ONE - 02-20.2015 PRELIMINARY 3 TINTED VISION&SPANDREL TINTED VISION k SPANDREL PUD SUBMITTAL N 1 IN ANODIZED ALUMINUM IN ANODIZED ALUMINUM FRAMES FRAMES 2 NORTHWEST ELEVATION As.t 3 SCALE 1/16•- 1•-0- NORTH 1 12 6 8 g 10 11 12 Axt PLADATE NTED PRE CONCRETE PANELS w/ /RECESSED AR ,REVEALS T /`PRE I SHED M AL COPING L T� A3.t *.O.WALL XXX AS.t 128_-B" �T ; ii XXX SOUTH - �T.O.WALL t l : I t I I I I 113'-B• _ I _- __J� _. .._-._' _._ __ - -__-_-.. -_ -- —t;— _ __ - .__ _ — _..- : I JL.._ _...._. 5 N.i M1E KEY PLAN 4 WEST ELEVATION srxE 1/t6 - 1' 0' PRO1EC J.COYLELE D—W G.HAWKINS cwcB Br 6 G.HAWKINS I G.PETERSON A 8 C D 11 10 g 9 7 PAINTED PRECAST CONCRETE PANELS w/ /RECESSED AREAS h REVEALS 12 RErasmnnDR /`PREFlNSHED M COPING *134'-4• *134'-4• `L T.O.WALL TA.WALL i ill i: i i, i; I , I ; Z` :i : I il± -{y-F0 LINE FLONE• I— .. T srlm rm[ E SOUTH ELEVATION 6 EAST ELEVATION srxE 1/16 - , o EXTERIOR 5 SCAlE 1/16•— t•-0• . ELEVATIONS cs BDwB� 2 s A3. 1 I — L 8014, OPUS' 2'-0'+ 4--o" 2'-0' THE OPUS GROUP Opus AE Group,L.L.C. 103M III-IN-1 WM ODF DECK VARIES. E 12'tk PANEL 12'tk PANEL 12'tk PANEL I 114-tk PANEL N- tk PANEL Opus Design Build,L.L.C. 103%6-Read VANO ................ 5�5-0110 952-M— EL WIDTH r TTP.PAN 1131 tk PAN I tk PANEL 11)f_ tk PANE. 12" 12" k 2-tk PANEL 7No PANEL tk PANEL 7 SMOOTH (VARIES) I.O�ROOF -Z DECK �Kl-TWO FLtNIE 2o RANDOM RID 12"tk PANEL 12'tk PANEL AREA I%C�� HATCHED 1/2" P I I I tk PANEL tk PANEL PRWECT SMOOTH ............. ............ .............. ` _ I __- I; _....____' ' ,j r. ., —J ............ = Energy CenterPoint 0 ;0 12'tk PANEL 12*LIN PANEL y X I,B,PANEL 12'tk PANEL LOCATION RANDOM.RIB Douglas Drive N �0 Golden Valley,MINI I tk PANE F q ............... I lh-tk PANEL ........................ 11A tk PANEL a fig PROJECT NUMBER 30742100 SMOOTH lf ONE FL.I 7zl- ISSUE RECORD 0 LEVEL ONE Fl-LINE — — — — — -- — — — — — — — — — 02-20-2015 PRELIMINARY • "ALL PANELS TO BE RANDOM RIB FINISH SMOOTH BANDS' \-�:TY—PCIIII,—PANE—LBEA—RING 'ALL PANELS TO BE FORM SIDE SMOOTH FINISH* PUD SUBMITTAL PARTIAL METAL SHOPE WING ELEVATION PARTIAL OFFICE WING ELEVATION 3 SCALE 3/16- 1-0- SCALE 3/16- 1--0- 32'-0" T.O.ROOF DECK(VARIES1 — — — — — — — — — — -- 12'tk PANEL 12'tk PANEL I —----------- 04"tk PANE I / ; 1 DATE PROSECT 1 1 12"tk PANEL 114'tk PANEL 12'tk PANEL tk PANE J.COYLE �tk PANEL DRAWN Ery G.HAWKINS cHECKEn By G.HAWKINS G.PETERSON REGISTRATION I%-tk PANEL I tk PANEL 7—z HATCHED AREA INDICATES 11 1/2'THICK PANEL j 1 12*tk PANEL I 12'B,PANEL -------------7- -----------I E '77-* EL ENLARGED .i I 1114 tk PANEL 14" tk PAN z LEVEL ONE FL LINE EXTERIOR — — ——2 — 41=41 /—Z'ee -4z - -zL ELEVATIONS - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - "ALL PANELS TO BE FORM SIDE SMOOTH FINISH* SHM NUMBER QLPALRETIA�LWAREHOUSE WING ELEVATION SCALE 3/16-- 11-0- A3.2 golden M E 1" 0 R Aa. "' 101, � valley Police Department 763-593-8079/763-593-8098(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting April 21, 2015 Agenda Item 6. A. First Consideration - Amendments to Sections 6.34: Tobacco and 10.67: Smoke Free Environment to prohibit sale and use of e-cigarettes in public and work places Prepared By Stacy Carlson, Chief of Police Summary In 2014, the Minnesota state legislature amended Minnesota Statute Chapter 144, the Clean Indoor Air Act, to define "e-cigarettes" and ban their use from certain state-owned facilities. E-cigarettes are not specifically defined in the Golden Valley City Code, nor are they specifically included in the prohibited use or sale in these sections. Attachments • Minnesota Clean Indoor Air Act (6 pages) • Draft of Section 6.34 Tobacco with underlined-overstruck language (1 page) • Draft of Section 10.67 Smoke Free Environment with underlined-overstruck language (1 page) • Ordinance #554, Amending Sections 6.34: Tobacco and 10.67: Smoke Free Environment (2 pages) Recommended Action Motion to adopt upon first consideration Ordinance #554, Amending Sections 6.34: Tobacco and 10.67: Smoke Free Environment to prohibit sale and use of e-cigarettes in public and work places. CLEAN INDOOR AIR ACT 144.411 CITATION. Sections 144.411 to 144.417 may be cited as the Minnesota Clean Indoor Air Act. 144.412 PUBLIC POLICY. The purpose of sections 144.411 to 144.417 is to protect employees and the general public from the hazards of secondhand smoke by eliminating smoking in public places, places of employment, public transportation, and at public meetings. 144.413 DEFINITIONS. Subdivision l.Scope. As used in sections 144.411 to 144.416, the terms defined in this section have the meanings given them. Subd. la.Indoor area. "Indoor area" means all space between a floor and a ceiling that is bounded by walls, doorways, or windows, whether open or closed, covering more than 50 percent of the combined surface area of the vertical planes constituting the perimeter of the area. A wall includes any retractable divider, garage door, or other physical barrier, whether temporary or permanent. A 0.011 gauge window screen with an 18 by 16 mesh count is not a wall. Subd. lb.Place of employment. "Place of employment" means any indoor area at which two or more individuals perform any type of a service for consideration of payment under any type of contractual relationship, including, but not limited to, an employment relationship with or for a private corporation, partnership, individual, or government agency. Place of employment includes any indoor area where two or more individuals gratuitously perform services for which individuals are ordinarily paid. A place of employment includes, but is not limited to, public conveyances, factories, warehouses, offices, retail stores, restaurants, bars, banquet facilities, theaters, food stores, banks, financial institutions, employee cafeterias, lounges, auditoriums, gymnasiums, restrooms, elevators, hallways, museums, libraries, bowling establishments, employee medical facilities, and rooms or areas containing photocopying equipment or other office equipment used in common. Vehicles used in whole or in part for work purposes are places of employment during hours of operation if more than one person is present. An area in which work is performed in a private residence is a place of employment during hours of operation if: (1) the homeowner uses the area exclusively and regularly as a principal place of business and has one or more on-site employees; or (2) the homeowner uses the area exclusively and regularly as a place to meet or deal with patients, clients, or customers in the normal course of the homeowner's trade or business. Subd. 2.Public place. "Public place" means any enclosed, indoor area used by the general public, including, but not limited to, restaurants; bars; any other food or liquor establishment; retail stores and other commercial establishments; educational facilities other than public schools, as defined in section 120A.05 subdivisions 9 11 and 13; hospitals; nursing homes; auditoriums; arenas; meeting rooms; and common areas of rental apartment buildings. Subd. 3.Public meeting. "Public meeting" includes all meetings open to the public pursuant to section 13D.01. Subd. 4.Smoking. "Smoking" means inhaling or exhaling smoke from any lighted cigar, cigarette, pipe, or any other lighted tobacco or plant product. Smoking also includes carrying a lighted cigar, cigarette,pipe, or any other lighted tobacco or plant product intended for inhalation. Subd. 5.Public transportation. "Public transportation" means public means of transportation, including light and commuter rail transit; buses; enclosed bus and transit stops; taxis, vans, limousines, and other for-hire vehicles other than those being operated by the lessee; and ticketing, boarding, and waiting areas in public transportation terminals. 144.414 PROHIBITIONS. Subdivision 1.Public places, places of employment, public transportation, and public meetings. Smoking shall not be permitted in and no person shall smoke in a public place, at a public meeting, in a place of employment, or in public transportation, except as provided in this section or section 144.4167. Subd. 2.Day care premises. (a,) Smoking is prohibited in a day care center licensed under Minnesota Rules, parts 9503.0005 to 9503.0175, or in a family home or in a group family day care provider home licensed under Minnesota Rules, parts 9502.0300 to 9502.0445, during its hours of operation. The proprietor of a family home or group family day care provider must disclose to parents or guardians of children cared for on the premises if the proprietor permits smoking outside of its hours of operation. Disclosure must include posting on the premises a conspicuous written notice and orally informing parents or guardians. (b) For purposes of this subdivision, the definition of smoking includes the use of electronic cigarettes, including the inhaling and exhaling of vapor from any electronic delivery device as defined in section 609.685, subdivision 1. Subd. 3.Health care facilities and clinics. (a) Smoking is prohibited in any area of a hospital, health care clinic, doctor's office, licensed residential facility for children, or other health care-related facility, except that a patient or resident in a nursing home, boarding care facility, or licensed residential facility for adults may smoke in a designated separate, enclosed room maintained in accordance with applicable state and federal laws. (b) Except as provided in section 246.0141, smoking by patients in a locked psychiatric unit may be allowed in a separated well-ventilated area in the unit under a policy established by the administrator of the program that allows the treating physician to approve smoking if, in the opinion of the treating physician, the benefits to be gained in obtaining patient cooperation with treatment outweigh the negative impacts of smoking. (c)For purposes of this subdivision, the definition of smoking includes the use of electronic cigarettes, including the inhaling and exhaling of vapor from any electronic delivery device as defined in section 609.685, subdivision 1. Subd. 4.Public transportation vehicles. Smoking is prohibited in public transportation vehicles except that the driver of a public transportation vehicle may smoke when the vehicle is being used for personal use. For purposes of this subdivision, "personal use" means that the public transportation vehicle is being used by the driver for private purposes and no for-hire passengers are present. If a driver smokes under this subdivision, the driver must post a conspicuous sign inside the vehicle to inform passengers. Subd. 5. Electronic cigarettes. (a) The use of electronic cigarettes, including the inhaling or exhaling of vapor from any electronic delivery device, as defined in section 609.685, subdivision 1, is prohibited in the following locations: (1) any building owned or operated by the state, home rule charter or statutory city, county, township, school district, or other political subdivision; (2) any facility owned by Minnesota State Colleges and Universities and the University of Minnesota; (3) any facility licensed by the commissioner of human services; or (4) any facility licensed by the commissioner of health, but only if the facility is also subject to federal licensing requirements. (b)Nothing in this subdivision shall prohibit political subdivisions or businesses from adopting more stringent prohibitions on the use of electronic cigarettes or electronic delivery devices. 144.415 [Repealed, 2007 c 82 s 15] 144.416 RESPONSIBILITIES OF PROPRIETORS. (a) The proprietor or other person, firm, limited liability company, corporation, or other entity that owns, leases, manages, operates, or otherwise controls the use of a public place, public transportation,place of employment, or public meeting shall make reasonable efforts to prevent smoking in the public place, public transportation, place of employment, or public meeting by: (1) posting appropriate signs or by any other means which may be appropriate; and (2) asking any person who smokes in an area where smoking is prohibited to refrain from smoking and, if the person does not refrain from smoking after being asked to do so, asking the person to leave. If the person refuses to leave, the proprietor, person, or entity in charge shall handle the situation consistent with lawful methods for handling other persons acting in a disorderly manner or as a trespasser. (b) The proprietor or other person or entity in charge of a public place,public meeting, public transportation, or place of employment must not provide smoking equipment, including ashtrays or matches, in areas where smoking is prohibited. Nothing in this section prohibits the proprietor or other person or entity in charge from taking more stringent measures than those under sections 144.414 to 144.417 to protect individuals from secondhand smoke. The proprietor or other person or entity in charge of a restaurant or bar may not serve an individual who is in violation of sections 144.411 to 144.417. 144.4165 TOBACCO PRODUCTS PROHIBITED IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS. No person shall at any time smoke, chew, or otherwise ingest tobacco or a tobacco productlor inhale or exhale vapor from an electronic delivery device as defined in section 609.685, subdivision 1, in a public school, as defined in section 120A.05, subdivisions 9, 11, and 13, and no person under the age of 18 shall possess any of these items. This prohibition extends to all facilities, whether owned, rented, or leased, and all vehicles that a school district owns, leases,rents, contracts for, or controls. Nothing in this section shall prohibit the lighting of tobacco by an adult as a part of a traditional Indian spiritual or cultural ceremony. For purposes of this section, an Indian is a person who is a member of an Indian tribe as defined in section 260.755 subdivision 12. 144.4167 PERMITTED SMOKING. Subdivision 1.Scientific study participants. Smoking by participants in peer reviewed scientific studies related to the health effects of smoking may be allowed in a separated room ventilated at a rate of 60 cubic feet per minute per person pursuant to a policy that is approved by the commissioner and is established by the administrator of the program to minimize exposure of nonsmokers to smoke. Subd. 2.Traditional Native American ceremonies. Sections 144.414 to 144.417 do not prohibit smoking by a Native American as part of a traditional Native American spiritual or cultural ceremony. For purposes of this section, a Native American is a person who is a member of an Indian tribe as defined in section 260.755, subdivision 12. Subd. 3.Private places. Except as provided in section 144.414, subdivision 2, nothing in sections 144.411 to 144.417 prohibits smoking in: (1) private homes, private residences, or private automobiles when they are not in use as a place of employment, as defined in section 144.413, subdivision lb; or (2) a hotel or motel sleeping room rented to one or more guests. Subd. 4.Tobacco products shop. Sections 144.414 to 144.417 do not prohibit the lighting of tobacco in a tobacco products shop by a customer or potential customer for the specific purpose of sampling tobacco products. For the purposes of this subdivision, a tobacco products shop is a retail establishment with an entrance door opening directly to the outside that derives more than 90 percent of its gross revenue from the sale of loose tobacco, plants, or herbs and cigars, cigarettes, pipes, and other smoking devices for burning tobacco and related smoking accessories and in which the sale of other products is merely incidental. "Tobacco products shop" does not include a tobacco department or section of any individual business establishment with any type of liquor, food, or restaurant license. Subd. 5.Heavy commercial vehicles. Sections 144.414 to 144.417 do not prohibit smoking in the cabs of motor vehicles registered under section 168.013, subdivision le, with a total gross weight of 26,001 pounds or greater. Subd. 6.Farm vehicles and construction equipment. Sections 144.414 to 144.417 do not prohibit smoking in farm trucks, as defined in section 168.002, subdivision 8; implements of husbandry, as defined in section 168A.01, subdivision 8; and special mobile equipment, as defined in section 168.002, subdivision 31. This subdivision applies to farm trucks, implements of husbandry, and special mobile equipment, when being used for their intended purposes. Subd. 7.Family farms. Sections 144.414 to 144.417 do not prohibit smoking in the house, garage, barns, and other buildings on a family farm that meet the following criteria: (1) the family farm is engaged in farming, as defined in section 500.24, subdivision 2,paragraph (a); (2) the family farm meets the definition of family farm under section 500.24, subdivision 2,paragraph(b), (c), 0), or(1); and(3)the family farm employs two or fewer persons who are not family members. Subd. 8.Disabled veterans rest camp. Sections 144.414 to 144.417 do not prohibit smoking in the disabled veterans rest camp located in Washington County, established as of January 1, 2007. Subd. 9.Theatrical productions. Sections 144.414 to 144.417 do not prohibit smoking by actors and actresses as part of a theatrical performance conducted in compliance with section 366.01. Notice of smoking in a performance shall be given to theater patrons in advance and shall be included in performance programs. 144.417 COMMISSIONER OF HEALTH, ENFORCEMENT, PENALTIES. Subdivision 1.Rules. The state commissioner of health shall adopt rules necessary and reasonable to implement the provisions of sections 144.411 to 144.417. Subd. 2.Violations. (a) Any proprietor, person, or entity that owns, leases, manages, operates, or otherwise controls the use of an area in which smoking is prohibited under sections 144.414 to 144.417, and that knowingly fails to comply with sections 144.414 to 144.417, is guilty of a petty misdemeanor. (b) Any person who smokes in an area where smoking is prohibited or restricted under sections 144.414 to 144.417 is guilty of a petty misdemeanor. (c) A proprietor, person, or entity in charge of a public place, public meeting, place of employment, or public transportation must not retaliate or take adverse action against an employee or anyone else who, in good faith,reports a violation of sections 144.414 to 144.417 to the proprietor or person in charge of the public place, public meeting, place of employment, or public transportation, or to the commissioner of health or other designee responsible for enforcing sections 144.414 to 144.417. (d)No person or employer shall discharge,refuse to hire,penalize, discriminate against, or in any manner retaliate against any employee, applicant for employment, or customer because the employee, applicant, or customer exercises any right to a smoke-free environment provided by sections 144.414 to 144.417 or other law. Subd. 3.Injunction. The state commissioner of health, a board of health as defined in section 145A.02, subdivision 2, or any affected party may institute an action in any court with jurisdiction to enjoin repeated violations of sections 144.414 to 144.417. Subd. 4.Local government ordinances. (a)Nothing in sections 144.414 to 144.417 prohibits a statutory or home rule charter city or county from enacting and enforcing more stringent measures to protect individuals from secondhand smoke. (b) Except as provided in sections 144.411 to 144.417, smoking is permitted outside of restaurants, bars, and bingo halls unless limited or prohibited by restrictions adopted in accordance with paragraph (a). § 6.34 J. Self-Service Merchandising: Open displays of tobacco, tobacco products, tobacco-related devices, or nicotine or lobelia delivery devices in any manner where any person shall have access to the tobacco, tobacco products, tobacco-related devices, or nicotine or lobelia delivery devices, without the assistance or intervention of the licensee or the licensee's employee. The assistance or intervention shall entail the actual physical exchange of the tobacco, tobacco product, tobacco-related device, or nicotine or lobelia delivery device between the customer and the licensee or employee. Self- service sales are interpreted as being any sale where there is not an actual physical exchange of the product between the clerk and the customer. K. Smoking: Inhaling or exhaling smoke from any lighted or heated cigar, cigarette, pipe, or any other lighted or heated tobacco or plant product. Smoking also includes carrying a lighted or heated cigar, cigarette, pipe, or any other lighted or heated tobacco or plant product intended for inhalation. For purposes of this Section, the definition of smoking includes the use of electronic cigarettes, including the inhaling and exhaling of vapor from any electronic delivery device as defined in Minnesota State Statute 609.685 Subd. 1. L. Tobacco or Tobacco Products: Tobacco and tobacco products includes cigarettes ci_garettec and any product containing, made, or derived from tobacco that is intended for human consumption, whether chewed, smoked, absorbed, dissolved, inhaled, snorted, sniffed, or ingested by any other means, or any component, part, or accessory of a tobacco product; cigars; cheroots; stogies; perique; granulated, plug cut, crimp cut, ready rubbed, and other smoking tobacco; snuff; snuff flour; cavendish; plug and twist tobacco; fine cut and other chewing tobaccos; shorts; refuse scraps, clippings, cuttings and sweepings of tobacco; and other kinds and forms of tobacco. Tobacco excludes any tobacco product that has been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for sale as a tobacco cessation product, as a tobacco dependence product, or for other medical purposes, and is being marketed and sold solely for such an approved purpose. M. Tobacco-Related Devices: Tobacco-related devices includes any tobacco product as well as a pipe, e-cigarette, rolling papers, ashtray, or other device intentionally designed or intended to be used in a manner which enables the chewing, sniffing or smoking of tobacco or tobacco products. N. Vending Machine: Any mechanical, electric or electronic, or other type of device which dispenses tobacco, tobacco products or tobacco-related devices upon the insertion of money, tokens or other form of payment directly into the machine by the person seeking to purchase the tobacco, tobacco product or tobacco-related device. Golden Valley City Code Page 3 of 3 § 10.67 E. Proprietor: The party, regardless of whether the party is owner or lessee of the place of work or public place, who ultimately controls, governs, or directs the activities within the place or work or public place. The term does not mean the owner of the property unless the owner ultimately controls, governs, or directs the activities within the public place. The term "Proprietor" may apply to a corporation as well as an individual. F. Public Place: Any enclosed, indoor area used by the general public or serving as a place of work, including, but not limited to, restaurants, retail stores, offices and other commercial establishments, public conveyances, educational facilities other than public schools, hospitals, nursing homes, auditoriums, arenas, meeting rooms, and common areas of rental apartment buildings. G. Smoking: The inhaling, exhaling, or combustion of any pipe, cigarette, cigar, tobacco product, weed, plant, or any other similar article. Smoking includes possessing or carrying a lighted pipe, cigarette, cigar, or any other lighted smoking equipment. For purposes of this Section, the derinibon or smoking includes the use of electronic cigarettes including the inhaling and exhaling of vapor from any electronic delivery device as defined in Minnesota State Statute 609.6851_ Suad. 1. Subdivision 3. Smoking Restrictions A. Smoking is prohibited in the following locations: 1. Public places and places of work, including both indoor and outdoor dining areas of liquor and food establishments; 2. Within twenty-five (25) feet of entrances, exits, open windows, and ventilation intakes of public places and places of work; 3. Within twenty-five (25) feet of any outdoor dining area at any liquor or food establishment; and 4. Public parks and recreation facilities. B. Exceptions. The prohibitions of this Section shall not apply to the following: 1. Private residences; 2. Privately rented sleeping rooms in hotels and motels; 3. Locations where smoking is expressly authorized by State or Federal law or rule; 4. Motor vehicles; and Golden Valley City Code Page 2 of 4 ORDINANCE NO. 554, 2ND SERIES AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE Amending Section 6.34: Tobacco and Section 10.67: Smoke Free Environment with the addition of E-Cigarettes The City Council for the City of Golden Valley hereby ordains: Section 1. City Code Section 6:34, Subdivision 2(K) is hereby amended by adding the following sentence after the first sentence: For purposes of this Section, the definition of smoking includes the use of electronic cigarettes, including the inhaling and exhaling of vapor from any electronic delivery device as defined in Minnesota State Statute 609.685, Subd. 1. Section 2. City Code Section 6:34, Subdivision 2(L) is hereby amended to read as follows: L. Tobacco or Tobacco Products: Tobacco and tobacco products includes cigarettes, e-cigarettes and any product containing, made, or derived from tobacco that is intended for human consumption, whether chewed, smoked, absorbed, dissolved, inhaled, snorted, sniffed, or ingested by any other means, or any component, part, or accessory of a tobacco product; cigars; cheroots; stogies; perique; granulated, plug cut, crimp cut, ready rubbed, and other smoking tobacco; snuff; snuff flour; cavendish; plug and twist tobacco; fine cut and other chewing tobaccos; shorts; refuse scraps, clippings, cuttings and sweepings of tobacco; and other kinds and forms of tobacco. Tobacco excludes any tobacco product that has been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for sale as a tobacco cessation product, as a tobacco dependence product, or for other medical purposes, and is being marketed and sold solely for such an approved purpose. Section 3. City Code Section 6:34, Subdivision 2(M) is hereby amended to read as follows: M. Tobacco-Related Devices: Tobacco-related devices includes any tobacco product as well as a pipe, e-cigarette, rolling papers, ashtray, or other device intentionally designed or intended to be used in a manner which enables the chewing, sniffing or smoking of tobacco or tobacco products. Section 4. City Code Section 10.67, Subdivision 2(G) is hereby amended by adding the following sentence after the first sentence: For purposes of this Section, the definition of smoking includes the use of electronic cigarettes, including the inhaling and exhaling of vapor from any electronic delivery device as defined in Minnesota State Statute 609.685, Subd. 1. Ordinance No. 554 - continued Section 5. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 6.99 and 10.99 entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 6. This Ordinance shall take effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law. Adopt by the City Council this 21 st day of April, 2015. /s/Shepard M. Harris Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: /s/Kristine A. Luedke Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk cit'Y MEMORANDUMgoldeti valley Administrative Services Department 763-593-8013/763-593-3969(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting April 21, 2015 Agenda Item 6. B. Council Salaries Review Prepared By Susan Virnig, Finance Director/Deputy City Clerk Summary City Code Section 2.19 Subdivision 5, states that in April of each odd numbered year, the City's staff shall provide to the Council the percentage representing the average salary or wage increase for City non-union employees for the previous two years so that the Council may consider appropriate increases in its salaries. Council salaries are reviewed every two years preceding the city election. Below is the salary or wage increase for City non-union employees for the previous two years. 2015 2.5% 2014 2.5% Current Salary New Salary Mayor $11,619 $12,207 Council Members $ 8,696 $ 9,136 In 2006, the Election Task Force report was received and filed, The report included that salaries for Council should receive a cost of living increase. Since 2006, the salary for council and mayor has not been increased. The 2015-2016 Council Budget has included an increase for salaries for these positions starting January 1, 2016. The increase, if approved, would begin January 2016. Attachments • City Code Section 2.19 (1 page) • Section from 2006 Election Task Force report (2 pages) • Survey of Council Salaries (2 pages) • Ordinance #555, Amending Salaries of Mayor and Council Members (1 page) Recommended Action Motion to adopt upon first consideration, Ordinance #555, Amending Salaries of Mayor and Council Members. § 2.19 Section 2.19: Salaries of Mayors and Council Members Subdivision 1 The annual salary of the Mayor shall be $11,619.00. Subdivision 2 The annual salary of each Council Member shall be $8,696.00. Source: Ordinance No. 281, 2id Series Effective Date: 7-18-03 Subdivision 3. Approved Additional Meetings In addition to their salaries, the Mayor and Council shall be paid $50.00 for each meeting they are directed or designated to attend, up to a maximum of $150.00 per month. The method for approval of meetings shall be outlined by resolution of the Council. Source: Ordinance No. 63, 2nd Series Effective Date: 4-25-91 Subdivision 4 The salaries provided for herein shall be effective January 1, 2004. Source: Ordinance No. 281, 2"d Series Effective Date: 7-18-03 Subdivision 5 In April of each odd numbered year, the City's staff shall provide to the Council the percentage representing the average salary or wage increase for City non-union employees for the previous two years so that the Council may consider appropriate increases in its salaries. Source: Ordinance No. 63, 2nd Series Effective Date: 4-25-91 Golden Valley City Code Page 1 of 1 Mayoral Te Issue: Should th term of the Mayor remain a two year term, or should the term b four year term? The Mayoral term i olden Valley is currently a two year term tle ,gtity Council Member terms are fo ears. Commission members contactedPlan B cities to ask the following questa s: ' • What is the current oral term length in your ci • Do you have a prefere for term length? • If so, what is the reason your preference Responses indicated that eight of th elve es surveyed preferred a four year term length. Reasons stated were tha a ur year term allowed more time to establish relationships and trust within constituent base. Four years also allowed more time to learn the job and take arg scale issues. Some responders believed the longer term provide ore conte ity and stability for the City. Some cities stated that with a two ye erm, campai ' g becomes burdensome and can distract the Mayor from oth ssues. Fourteen citizens sury ed at the Voter Fair preferre four year term and three persons thought th erm should be just two years. Recommend on: The Task Force strongly supports a mo to a four year Mayoral term. Esta shing the longer term length will require adjustor is in election cycles. The pro s used to accomplish that change will require furthe onsideration. Council Salaries Issue: Is the current level of compensation for Mayor and Council Members appropriate? The Task Force reviewed Council and Mayor salary comparisons. In addition to the salary amount, the Task Force considered how the City could attract a more diverse group of candidates for Council and Mayoral seats. Ideas brought forth included: increased monetary compensation, tuition reimbursement and other education benefits, the opportunity to participate in City insurance plans, and reimbursement for meeting and travel expenses related to the work of the Council Members. The Task Force questioned how an ordinance providing additional benefits for Council Members would be enacted, and what authority the city has to provide non-traditional forms of compensation. The group considered the premise that Council salaries may be considered to be symbolic. They discussed the purpose of Council compensation and the effect compensation and benefit levels may have on potential candidates and their decision to run. Responses from the Voter Fair indicated that seven persons believed the Council salary should be increased, and eight believed the salaries should not be increased or should stay the same. Recommendation: The Task Force recommends further deliberation by the City Council in setting compensation limits and offers the following considerations to guide that Council discussion: 1. Consider role of salaries in decision to run; encourage access of under- represented communities in seeking and holding office; define what the symbolic role of compensation means to members of Council. 2. Council "across the board increase"in salaries; stipend to be at or near the top of salary scale for like communities. 3. Enact ordinance that will provide for cost of living increase, Council stipend or some other"objective measurement". 4. Should include enhanced benefits, such as tuition reimbursement, as a means of encouraging Council participation; classes taken should be relevant to City business and there should be "some"maximum on reimbursement amount. Process for filling vacancv on Council Issue: Is the process cu rr ly in place for filling va ncies on the council adequate? Task Force members in " ed City Attorne arnard to join in the discussion on this topic. State law req ui s the City C ncil to appoint a replacement to serve out the balance of the term the cas f a vacancy. Council has the authority to adopt an ordinance calling fo ` spe ' I election to fill a vacancy, or to determine the process it will use to make C nciI appointment. Given the cost of a special election and the rarity of ancies, the Task Force agreed that the laws currently in place provide adequ uidance. Also given the fact that vacancies may occur for differing reasons nd different times, the option for flexibility in determining an appropriate pr ess filling a vacancy is important to maintain. The Task Force also review statute se ' ns regarding removal of a Council Member and determined t t no additional tions exist for the City on this topic beyond current statutes. Recommendation: W ' ecommend no changes the current process for filling Council vacancies. Group Health Annual AnM+al Qrgankz tlon Jtib Tltle Anqua15a1ary, Additional Payment Allows!I(Yes` Health insurance CttY rio:t C[ty t or NO) Provider. Single F#rr+ily Hes Ith� Hoi#fr; Albert Lea Council Member $8,000.00 N Albert Lea Mayor $12,000.00 N Andover Council Member $7,500.00 $1.00 per EDA Meeting N N/A Andover Mayor $9,500.00 $1.00 per meeting for EDA N N/A Apple Valley Council Member $8,028.00 Yes BCBS 731.17 1,150.00 Apple Valley Mayor $11,220.00 Yes BCBS NA 1,150.00 Austin Council Member $6,600.00 $0 X N/A Austin Mayor $9,000.00 $0 X N/A Becker Council Member $3,600.00 $150 monthly meeting stipend N N/A Becker Mayor $4,200.00 $150 monthly meeting stipend N N/A Blaine Council Member $10,000.00 Blaine Mayor $13,367.00 Bloomington Council Member $12,396.00 Bloomington Mayor $26,400.00 Brooklyn Center Council Member $9,070.00 No Brooklyn Center Mayor $11,486.00 No Brooklyn Park Council Member $111400.00 Brooklyn Park Mayor $17,100.00 Burnsville Council Member $8,400.00 0 Y Health Partners 6,798.00 14,350.00 Burnsville Mayor $12,000.00 Champlin Council Member $6,610.00 0 Y Health Partners 0.00 0.00 Champlin Mayor $9,550.00 0 Y Health Partners 0.00 0.00 Chanhassen Council Member $4,800.00 $50 per meeting X Chanhassen Mayor $6,000.00 $50 per meeting X Chaska Council Member $6,948.00 0 X n.a. 0.00 0.00 Chaska Mayor $8,208.00 0 X n.a. 0.00 0.00 Columbia Heights Council Member $7,800.00 0 Y Medica 6,089.64 9,660.00 Columbia Heights Mayor $13,800.00 0 Y Medica 6,089.64 9,660.00 Coon Rapids Council Member at large $12,250.00 Coon Rapids Council Member-ward $10,500.00 Coon Rapids Mayor $14,000.00 Cottage Grove Council Member $6,780.00 No Cottage Grove Mayor $9,216.00 No Crystal Council Member $8,169.72 No Crystal Mayor $10,619.84 No Eagan Council Member $10,005.00 Yes BCBS 608.67 0.00 Eagan Mayor $13,624.00 Yes BCBS 608.67 1 0.00 Eden Prairie Council Member $10,740.00 Eden Prairie Mayor $13,500.00 Edina Council Member $10,740.00 Edina Mayor $13,500.00 Elk River Council Member $7,000.00 $1800 annual for EDA N Elk River Mayor $10,000.00 $1800 annual for EDA N Faribault Council Member $7,220.00 X Faribault Mayor $8,480.00 X Farmington Council Member $7,020.00 No Farmington Mayor $8,040.00 No Forest Lake Council Member $5,500.00 No N Health Partners Forest Lake Mayor $6,500.00 No N Health Partners Fridley Council Member $8,650.00 Y PreferredOne 7,111.56 10,380.00 Fridley Mayor $10,531.00 Y PreferredOne 7,111.56 10,380.00 Golden Valley Council Member $8,696.00 $50/mtg,up to 3 monthly N Golden Valley Mayor $11,619.00 $50/mtg,up to 3 monthly N Ham Lake Council Member $4,900.00 N/A N Ham Lake Mayor $6,000.00 N/A N Hastings Council Member $6,000.00 0 N Hastings Mayor $8,400.00 0 N Hopkins Council Member $4,600.00 0 X N/A Hopkins Mayor $6,000.00 0 X N/A Inver Grove Heights Council Member $7,000.00 Inver Grove Heights Mayor $9,000.00 Lakeville Council Member $8,664.00 $25 per HRA meeting No Lakeville Mayor $9,996.00 $25 per HRA meeting No Lino Lakes Council Member $5,018.00 $40 N None Lino Lakes Mayor $6,272.00 $40 N None Maple Grove Council Member $12,500.00 Maple Grove lMayor $14,500.00 Groyp.Health Ann ua)7Aniwal_ Healthinsurance Cttyon Orpraxetion. Job Tule Annual-So Alii lml feymert� _ Allowed(Yes .provider; Strut: Fetrdty or No► tfealdt Heaitii Maplewood Council Member $11,314.00 Maplewood Mayor $12,855.00 Mendota Heights Council Member $4,200.00 Mendota Heights Mayor $5,700.00 Minnetonka Council Member $9,000.00 Minnetonka Mayor $12,000.00 New Brighton Council Member $7,000.00 Y Health Partners 7,147.56 7,147.56 New Brighton Mayor $8,600.00 Y Health Partners 7,147.56 7,147.56 New Hope Council Member $8,619.00 $25 per EDA meeting x HealthPartners 0.00 0.00 effective 1/1/15 New Hope Mayor $11,801.00 $25 per EDA meeting X HealthPartners 0.00 0.00 effective 1/1/15 Northfield Council Member $7,200.00 0 N N/A 0.00 0.00 Northfield Mayor $9,600.00 0 N N/A 0.00 0.00 Owatonna Council Member $7,200.00 x 0.00 0.00 Owatonna Mayor $9,000.00 Council Pres.=$9000.00 x 0.00 0.00 Plymouth Council Member $10,146.00 Plymouth Mayor $14,000.00 Prior Lake Council Member $7,440.00 $50.00 per meeting N N/A 0.00 0.00 Prior Lake Mayor $9,420.00 $50.00 per meeting X N/A 0.00 0.00 Ramsey Council Member $6,000.00 x Ramsey Mayor $8,000.00 x Red Wing Council Member $7,550.40 $75.00 for Board of Equalization mtg N N/A 0.00 0.00 Red Wing Mayor $7,550.40 N N/A 0.00 0.00 Richfield Council Member $8,070.00 N Richfield Mayor $10,379.00 N Robbinsdale Council Member $8,097.00 No $8,259 1/1/16 Robbinsdale Mayor $10,151.00 No $10,3541/1/16 Rosemount Council Member $7,000.00 $35/Port Authority Meeting N effective 1/1/15 Rosemount Mayor $9,200.00 $35/Port Authority Meeting N effective 1/1/15 Roseville Council Member $7,020.00 0 N Roseville Mayor $9,300.00 0 N Sartell Council Member $5,200.00 $0 N Sartell Mayor $7,500.00 $0 N Savage Council Member $6,000.00 0 N Savage Mayor $8,000.00 N Shakopee Council Member $7,500.00 Shakopee Mayor $15,000.00 0 Shoreview Council Member $6,792.00 N Shoreview Mayor $9,156.00 N South St.Paul Council Member $6,600.00 N South St.Paul Mayor $10,200.00 N Spring Lake Park Council Member $5,787.23 N Spring Lake Park Mayor $7,234.04 N St.Louis Park Council Member $6,807.00 $4,385 additional for serving on EDA N St.Louis Park Mayor $11,796.00 $4,385 additional for serving on EDA St,Michael Council Member $0.00 $60.00 per meeting x St.Michael Mayor $0.00 $70.00 per meeting x Stillwater Council Member $7,200.00 Y BC/BS 492.00 849.86 Stillwater Mayor $9,000.00 x 492.00 849.86 Waconia Council Member $4,000.00 N Waconia Mayor $4,900.00 N West St.Paul Council Member $6,500.00 x West St.Paul Mayor $8,100.00 x White Bear Lake Council Member $7,680.00 N White Bear Lake Mayor $5,400.00 N Willmar Council Member $7,500.00 $20 per hour Y N/A 0.00 0.00 Willmar Mayor $12,000.00 $20 per hour Y N/A 0.00 0.00 Winona Council Member $6,696.00 x BC/BS Winona Mayor $9,407.00 x BC/BS Woodbury Council Member $8,100.00 Woodbury Mayor $11,004.00 ORDINANCE NO. 555, 2ND SERIES AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE Amending Salaries of Mayor and Council Members The City Council for the City of Golden Valley hereby ordains: Section 1. City Code Section 2.19, Subd. 1. 2. and 4. are hereby amended to read: Subd. 1. The annual salary of the Mayor shall be $11,619. 12,207 Subd. 2. The annual salary of each Council Member shall be $8,696. $9,136 Subd. 4. The salaries provided for herein shall be effective January 1, 2004 2016. Section 2. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" is hereby adopted in its entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law. /s/Shepard M Harris Shepard M Harris, Mayor ATTEST: /s/Kristine A Luedke Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk citv0 olde- n M E �1 ,. _ ,. .. valley Physical Development Department 763-593-80951763-593-8109(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting April 21, 2015 Agenda Item 6. C. METRO Blue Line Extension Update Prepared By Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager Project Summary At its April meeting, the Corridor Management Committee (CMC) voted to continue to study both Golden Valley light rail stations (at Golden Valley Road and Plymouth Avenue) for potential inclusion in the final project scope. An updated budget and refreshed ridership numbers, as well as additional environmental information about the impacts of each station, will be available later in the year and will help inform a decision by the CMC and the Metropolitan Council. Station Area Summary The project consultants for Hennepin County have completed a draft of the final station area planning report. The draft will be reviewed and revised in advance of the final Open House, to be held on Thursday, May 21, at UROC. Following the Open House, the Planning Commission will review the plan and present it to the City Council for adoption as a Planning Study. This will be used to inform the Comprehensive Planning update process over the new few years. Attachments • Email regarding METRO Blue Line Extension (1 page) Recommended Action Receive and file METRO Blue Line Extension Update. From: Sarah Bray Date: March 24, 2015 at 4:20:22 PM CDT Subject: light rail feedback Hello - I'm writing because I wasn't able to attend the public meeting about the Blue Line extension. I support the concept of light rail and I think ideally it should serve as many people as possible. The proposed Golden Valley station would expand public transportation to an area of Golden Valley that's currently underserved, as well as a portion of North Minneapolis that's really hurting for infrastructure and economic development (for example, Golden Valley Rd. around Sheridan through Upton Aves.). I've always been a city person and currently live in Golden Valley only 3 blocks from the border of Minneapolis -- I can see downtown from my house! -- and yet public transportation is extremely limited. There's one bus route (the 14) within walking distance, and during the day it leaves once per hour. This means a half-hour meeting downtown can require a time commitment of up to 3 hours. The area around the proposed Theodore Wirth station is served by the 7, the 32, and the 19 buses, and is relatively close to the rapid bus transit line planned for Penn Ave. Ideally, both would have a light rail station: with the amount the light rail will cost to build, it seems a better investment to reach the most people possible. But, if Golden Valley is going to have the light rail running all through it, bringing noise and intersection delays and some danger for pedestrians and animals, it should also be served by the light rail. Many people here would like to make better use of public transportation. Thank you very much for your time, Sarah Bray ct it goldenoiliv�4r M E M 0 R A N D U M va ley Physical Development Department 763-593-8095/763-593-8109(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting April 21, 2015 Agenda Item 6. D. Bottineau LRT Community Works Steering Committee Appointments Prepared By Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager Summary Hennepin County is creating a Bottineau LRT Community Works program to support the METRO Blue Line Extension project. Over the next few years, the program will work with corridor cities and stakeholders to plan and implement projects that extend "beyond the rails" of the line itself. The County has invited Golden Valley to appoint two elected officials to the steering committee, which is anticipated to meet every other month in the early afternoon. The deadline for the appointments is April 23. The steering committee will coordinate closely with the Corridor Management Committee. A technical advisory committee made up of staff, will report to the steering committee and assist in implementing the work plan. Attachments • Letter from Hennepin County dated April 9, 2015 (2 pages) Recommended Action Motion to appoint two City Council Members to the Bottineau LRT Community Works Steering Committee. FAX: 612-348-8701 TDD: 612-348-7708 BOARD OF HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMISSIONERS A-2400 GOVERNMENT CENTER MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55487-0240 * VE' April 9, 2015 APR 13 7015 BY: Mayor Shep Harris City of Golden Valley 7800 Golden Valley Road Golden Valley, MN 55427 Dear Mayor Harris: Hennepin County is establishing the Bottineau LRT Community Works program to formalize and expand early collaborations across jurisdictions within the Bottineau Light Rail Transit (LRT) Corridor. As we presented to your City Council earlier this year, the goal of the Bottineau LRT Community Works program is to partner with cities and key stakeholders along the corridor in a collaborative planning and implementation process that will strategically leverage the transit investment, stimulate economic development, increase the tax base, and help connect people to employment centers, educational institutions and regional amenities. A steering committee is being assembled to direct the Bottineau LRT Community Works program and actively engage partners in this critical planning and implementation effort that focuses on everything that needs to occur outside the rails. The committee will also coordinate with the BLRT Corridor Management Committee to ensure there is policy coordination. Upon convening, the steering committee will establish project and partnership goals as well as a work plan. We invite you to appoint two elected officials to this committee. The first meeting will be held on Thursday, April 30, 2015 from 1:30-3:00 PM at North Hennepin Community College, 7411 85th Avenue North, Brooklyn Park, MN Room ES40. For your convenience a map of the campus is enclosed. It is currently anticipated that the Steering Committee will meet every other month with the following dates proposed for 2015: June 18, August 27, October 29, and December 3. All meetings will be held from 1:30 to 3:00 PM. A technical advisory committee (TAC) has already been established to support the station area planning effort currently underway. The TAC will report to the steering committee and will be responsible for implementing the work plan. April 9, 2015 Page 2 We look forward to working with you on the Bottineau LRT Community Works project. Please contact Darlene Walser by April 23, 2015 at (612) 596-7891 or darlene.walser(cD- hennepin.us to provide contact information for your representatives to the Bottineau LRT Community Works steering committee. Sincerely, Commissioner Mike Opat Commissioner Linda Higgins Hennepin County Hennepin County cc: Tom Burt, City Manager Marc Nevinski, Community Development Director Enclosure