The URL can be used to link to this page

05-05-15 CC Agenda Packet (entire) AGENDA Regular Meeting of the City Council Golden Valley City Hall 7800 Golden Valley Road Council Chamber May 5, 2015 6:30 pm The Council may consider item numbers 1, 2, 3, 5 and 6 prior to the public hearings scheduled at 7 pm 1. CALL TO ORDER PAGES A. Roll Call B. Pledge of Allegiance 2. ADDITIONS AND CORRECTIONS TO AGENDA 3. CONSENT AGENDA Approval of Consent Agenda - All items listed under this heading are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no discussion of these items unless a Council Member or citizen so requests in which event the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda. A. Approval of Minutes 1. Council/Manager Meeting February 10, 2015 3-5 2. City Council Meeting April 21, 2015 6-11 B. Approval of City Check Register 12 C. Licenses: 1. Solicitor's License - Budget Exteriors, Inc. 13-15 2. General Business License 16 D. Minutes of Boards and Commissions: 1. Planning Commission - April 13, 2015 17-30 2. Human Right Commission Minutes - March 26, 2015 31-34 3. Board of Zoning Appeal - February 24, 2015 35-38 E. Letters, Emails and/or Petitions: 1. Letter from Craig McDaniels Regarding Resignation from Human Service Fund 39 F. Approve requests for Beer and/or Wine at Brookview Park 40-41 G. Proclamation for Arbor Day and Arbor Month 42-44 H. Second Consideration - Ordinance #554 - Amendments to Sections 6.34: Tobacco 45-47 and 10.67: Smoke Free Environment to prohibit sale and use of e-cigarettes in public and work places I. Support for Application Submittal for Hennepin County 2015 Bikeway Participation 48-51 Program 15-37 J. Approve Assignment and Assumption Agreements with Jewish Housing and 52-63 Programming 15-38 K. Receipt of Notice of Metropolitan Council Action - General Land Use Plan, 64-65 Comprehensive Plan Amendment L. Approve Revisions to various Boards and Commissions Bylaws 66-83 M. Board/Commission Reappointments 84-85 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS 7 PM A. Public Hearing - Preliminary PUD Plan for Liberty Crossing PUD No. 123 - 7751- 86-139 7775 Medicine Lake Road, 2430 and 2480 Winnetka Avenue North, 2485 Rhode Island Avenue North - Intuitive Investments, Applicant B. Public Hearing - Ordinance #556 - Rezoning 7751-7775 Medicine Lake Road, 2430 140-148 and 2480 Winnetka Avenue North, and 2485 Rhode Island Avenue North, Intuitive Investments, Applicant C. Public Hearing - Amendments to the General Land Use Plan Map - 9000 & 9050 149-165 Golden Valley Road 15-39 5. OLD BUSINESS A. Authorize City Manager to Sign Contract with Hammel, Green and Abrahamson 166-168 (HGA) for Replacement of Brookview Community Center Phase II 15-40 B. Second Consideration - Ordinance #555 - Amendment of Salaries of Mayor and 169-176 Council Members 6. NEW BUSINESS A. First Consideration - Ordinance #557 - Adoption of Chapters 1305 and 1323 of the 177-180 State Building Code B. Announcements of Meetings C. Mayor and Council Communications 7. ADJOURNMENT Council/Manager Meeting Minutes February 10, 2015 Present: Mayor Harris and Council Members, Clausen, Fonnest, Schmidgall and Snope, City Manager Tom Burt, Physical Development Director Marc Nevinski, Finance Director Sue Virnig, City Engineer Jeff Oliver, Planning Manager Jason Zimmerman, Associate Planner/Grants Writer Emily Goellner, Public Works Specialist Eric Eckman and Administrative Assistant Judy Nally. The meeting began at 6:45 pm in the Council Conference Room. Planning Commission Annual Report Planning Commission Chair John Kluchka was in attendance to review the Commission's 2014 annual report. The Council discussed land use strategic planning in conjunction with comprehensive plan, plan review, and communicating of land use decisions. Council The Council requested the Planning Commission review the recommendations from Chair Kluchka. The Council will prioritize Planning Commission issues for review after the Strategic Planning meetings are held. Consideration of Golden Valley Fire Relief Association By-Law Amendments Fire Relief Association President Bryan Magnuson and Treasurer Chris Gemlo reviewed the request to increase the retirement benefit level from $7,300 to $7,500. If the Council supports the increase the Association will vote at their next Board Meeting. The Council supports the amendments to the by-laws. The by-laws will be placed on a future City Council agenda for approval. Joint Powers Agreement - PUD No. 121 - Central Park West - Southwest Quadrant of 1-394 and Highway 100 Associate Planner/Grant Writer Emily Goellner and Planning Manager Jason Zimmerman reviewed the Joint Powers Agreement and Development Agreement. City Engineer Jeff Oliver reviewed the traffic study. The Council had questions about public safety, fire protection, the traffic study, traffic projections, development stages, street improvements and trails. The Joint Powers Agreement will be placed on a future Council Agenda for approval. Residential Construction Management Agreement Physical Development Director Marc Nevinski and Associate Planner/Grant Writer Emily Goellner reviewed the agreement. This agreement outlines regulations for demolitions, new construction, or major remodeling on residential property and will be updated as necessary by staff. The Council discussed the agreement and requested clarification of provisions for site cleanup, and demolition of building clean-up. They asked that the City Code or Statute reference be added if space allows. Council/Manager Meeting Minutes February 10, 2015 — Page 2 Proposed City Code Amendment - Chapter 4.31: Stormwater Management Public Works Specialist Eric Eckman reviewed the proposed amendments. The ordinance will update and clarify thresholds which trigger permit applications, review construction site stormwater management, buffers, and illicit discharge. The amendments to City Code Chapter 4.31 will be considered at a future City Council meeting. Proposed City Code Amendments - Section 6.34 Tobacco, and Section 10.67 Smoke Free - E-cigarettes Provisions City Manager Burt stated that the State Legislature amended the Clean Indoor Air Act to define e-cigarettes. The Council consensus was to amend City Code Section 6.34 and 10.67 to prohibit the sale of e-cigarettes and use of e-cigarettes in public places and places of work. The amendments to City Code Chapter 6.34 and 10.67 will be considered at a future City Council meeting. Guidelines for Advisory Commissions, Committees, Boards and Councils. The Council discussed the Guidelines for Advisory Commissions, Committees, Boards and Councils. The Council consensus was to amend the guidelines as follows: Terms of office for Chair and Vice Chair may be two years. This is a change from the previous one year term. The Council will approve the revision at an upcoming City Council meeting. Board/Commission Vacancies - Appointments to Blue Line Extension LRT Community (CAC) and Business Advisory Committees (BAC) The Council is being requested to appoint two members to the Blue Line Extension Community Advisory Committee and the Business Advisory Committee. The Council directed staff to inform members who are currently serving on the LRT Planning Advisory Committee of the openings and request interested members fill out an application for consideration. The Council will conduct interviews on February 23, 2015 at 5 or 5:30 pm. Staff will contact the larger business owners, businesses in area, and the Golden Valley Business Council and inform them of the committee and ask if they would like to recommend a BAC member. The Council will make the appointments at the March 3, 2015, City Council Meeting. Board/Commission Vacancies -Northwest Suburbs Cable Communications Commission (NSCCC) Council Member Clausen serves on the NSCCC and was appointed to the Board of Directors as an At-Large member. There is one vacancy on the NSCCC as Joan Russell resigned. Council Member Clausen provided an NSCCC update. The vacancy can be filled by a Council Member or resident. No other Council Member volunteered to serve. The Council requested staff to check with the Northwest Council/Manager Meeting Minutes February 10, 2015 — Page 3 Communities Television Director to find out if one of their volunteers would be interested in serving. Board/Commission Vacancies - Human Services Fund and Board of Zoning Appeals Alternates There are two vacancies on the Human Services Fund (HSF). Staff has received two applications from people interested in serving on the HSF. The Council set an interview date for February 17, 2015, at 5:30 pm and requested staff to notify the applicants of the interview dates. The Council also discussed the Board of Zoning Appeals Alternate vacancies. The Council consensus is to continue to use the Planning Commission members as alternates as needed and not specifically appoint alternates. Mayor Harris stated his term on the Beyond the Yellow Ribbon Campaign expires in March and wanted to know if any Council Member is interested in serving. The Board meets monthly but is considering meeting on a quarterly basis. Council Member Clausen stated she is the alternate and would serve as the delegate if meetings are held quarterly. It was also suggested to contact the Board to see if there are any veteran's organizations that may be interested is serving. Mayor Harris will contact the Board Chair and find out the status of the Board meetings and will forward information to the City Manager. Upcoming Meetings Seven Dreams Bird Bash - February 21, 2015 - 5 pm - Minneapolis Marriott Northwest Council Strategic Planning - February 23, 2015 - 6:30 pm Golden Valley Business Council - February 26, 2015 City Council Meeting - March 3 - 6:30 pm Council Quarterly Review Session - March 10, 2015 - 5:30 pm Council/Manager Meeting - March 10, 2015 - 6:30 pm Council Strategic Planning - March 12, 2015 - 6:30 pm Council Strategic Planning - March 14, 2015 - 9 am Tri-City Council Meeting - March 31, 2015 - 6 pm The meeting adjourned at 10:55 pm. Judy Nally Administrative Assistant City Of UNOFFICIAL MINUTES CITY COUNCIL MEETING QIOWtT, GOLDEN VALLEY, MINNESOTA ' April 21, 2015 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Harris called the meeting to order at 6:30 pm. 1A. Roll Call Present: Mayor Harris, Council Members Clausen, Schmidgall, Snope and Fonnest 1 B. Pledge of Allegiance 2. ADDITIONS AND CORRECTIONS TO AGENDA MOTION made by Council Member Snope, seconded by Council Member Fonnest to approve the agenda of April 21, 2015, as submitted and the motion carried unanimously. 3. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA MOTION made by Council Member Snope, seconded by Council Member Fonnest to approve the consent agenda of April 21, 2015, as revised: removal of 3C3-Approve solicitor's license, 3D2-Accept filing of Human Rights Commission Minutes, 3H-Adopt Resolution Authorizing Transfer of $692,000 to the Building Improvement Fund, 31K-Proclamation for National Public Works Week and the motion carried unanimously. 3A1. Approve Minutes of the City Council - Administrative Hearing - April 7, 2015 3A2. Approve Minutes of the City Council Meeting - April 7, 2015 3131. Approve City Check Register and authorize the payments of the bills as submitted. 3132. Approve Housing and Redevelopment Authority check register and authorize the payments of the bills as submitted. 3C1. Receive and file the gambling license exemption and approve the waiver of notice requirement for School of Engineering and Arts - Parent Teacher Association. 3C2. Adopt Resolution 15-33, Approving Issuance of a Premises Permit for the Conduct of Lawful Gambling - Minnesota/USA innesota/USA Wrestling, Inc. 3G3. Approve 60liGitOP'S IGe se fer FuRGI fee the 7. 41:. IRterestf 3D. Accept for filing the Minutes of Boards and Commissions as follows: 1. Planning Commissioyyn�+ March (233�, 2�015�� L. Hw lT TT7G'o....... 7V'1"'1-'T-ebruary 24, 015 3E1. Approve purchase of the Galaxy Radio Transmitter Model 25 Gallon RTR with Galaxy Modules from Metering Technology and Solutions for a cost of $79,800. 3E2. Authorize a contract with Applied Ecological Services in the amount of $32,212.51 for the 2015 Brookview Golf Course Pond Buffer Implementation, City Project No. 15-17. 3F. Approve the requests for beer and/or wine at Brookview Park as recommended by staff. 3G. Adopt Resolution 15-34, Authorizing a Corrected Certification of Special Assessments on Public Improvements Construction for Eldridge 3rd Addition P.U.D. 109 (Resolution 13-84). to the B OIGIORg IMPFG\/or eRt F REI 31. Receive and file the March 2015 Financial Reports. 3J. Adopt Resolution 15-36, Authorizing the Revision of Municipal State Aid Street Routes. 3K. PFeGlamatieR fer NatiE)Ral PUbliG VVoFkE; Week. 3L. Proclamation for Fibromyalgia Awareness Day. 3M. Appoint Mr. Ben Colglazier to the Bottineau LRT Business Advisory Committee. Unofficial City Council Minutes -2- April 21, 2015 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA 3C3. Approve solicitor's license for Fund for the Public Interest. City Manager Burt answered questions from Council. MOTION made by Council Member Fonnest, seconded by Council Member Clausen to approve the Solicitor's License for Fund for the Public Interest and the motion carried unanimously. 3D2. Accept for filing the Minutes of the Human Rights Commission- February 24, 2015 MOTION made by Council Member Snope, seconded by Council Member Clausen to accept for filing the Human Rights Commission minutes of February 24, 2015, and the motion carried unanimously. 3H. Adopt Resolution 15-35, Authorizing the Transfer of$692,000 from the General Fund to the Building Improvement Fund. Finance Director Virnig presented the staff report and answered questions from Council. MOTION made by Council Member Schmidgall, seconded by Council Member Snope to adopt Resolution 15-35, Authorizing the Transfer of$692,000 from the General Fund to the Building Improvement Fund upon a vote being taken the following voted in favor of: Snope, Fonnest, Clausen and Schmidgall, the following voted against: Harris and the motion carried. 3K. Proclamation for National Public Works Week. Council thanked the Public Works staff for all of their hard work over the past year. MOTION made by Council Member Fonnest, seconded by Council Member Clausen to adopt the Proclamation for National Public Works Week and the motion carried unanimously. 4. PUBLIC HEARING 4A. Public Hearing -Ordinance #553 - Amending Section 11.70 Reducing Hotel Minimum Parking Requirement Planning Manager Zimmerman presented the staff report and answered questions from Council. Mayor Harris opened the public hearing. Ms. Stacy Hoschka, 6400 Golden Valley Road, asked if a hotel decides to remodel, could the City require them to add rain gardens and be brought up to City Code. She asked if the hotels would be revising their existing parking lot. She said she is in favor of the Code change. Mayor Harris closed the public hearing. There was Council discussion regarding amending the Section of the code related to the minimum hotel parking requirement. Unofficial City Council Minutes -3- April 21, 2015 4A. Public Hearing - Amending Section 11.70 Reducing Hotel - continued MOTION made by Council Member Fonnest, seconded by Council Member Snope to adopt Ordinance #553, Amending Section 11.70 Reducing Hotel Minimum Parking Requirement, upon a vote being taken the following voted in favor of: Harris, Snope, Fonnest, Clausen and Schmidgall, the following voted against: none and the motion carried. 413. Public Hearing - Preliminary PUD Plan for CenterPoint Energy PUD No. 122 - 6161 Golden Valley Road - CenterPoint Energy, Applicant Planning Manager Zimmerman presented the staff report and answered questions from Council. City Manager Burt and City Attorney Barnard answered questions from Council. Mr. Dave Long, Facilities Project Manager, CenterPoint Energy, said his design team has worked hard to come up with a building and site plan that is functional, aesthetically pleasing and environmentally friendly. He said CenterPoint has occupied the site for over 60 years and is excited to be able to fully utilize it. Ms. Vicky VanDell, Louks Associates, representing the Applicant, showed renderings of the views from Douglas Drive and the southwest corner of the site. The views included the proposed foliage and she explained it will make the site more pedestrian friendly. Mr. Paul Kangas, Louks Associates, representing the Applicant, said the proposed plan will include approximately $100,000 in landscaping design. Mr. Dan Young Dixon, OPUS Architects and Engineers, said two important facts of the project are the building aesthetics and the relationship between the site and the community. He showed a series of renderings of the site with the proposed development. He explained what the main entry to the site and the view from the proposed round-about would look like. He said it will have a park-like feel with both summer and winter foliage but added they had to be careful of the foliage used in some areas because of security reasons. He showed renderings of the site before the proposed landscaping and after. He showed a materials board of the proposed materials that will be used on the building. He stated with the new building, they are looking at getting LEED certified. He answered questions from Council. Mayor Harris opened the public hearing. Ms. Stacy Hoschka, 6400 Golden Valley Road, said the site is across the street from her house. She asked questions regarding the type of lighting, hours of operation, noise levels and what the maximum building heights are. She said she would like more shielding on the residential side of the site and that she is not opposed to the development plan but has questions about it. She asked what the existing pipes on the site are for, what the two entrances are for, and what the amount cars in the parking lot would be. She said she has a safety concern for her family about the tanks. She asked about the stormwater ponding and if it has been submitted for a stormwater development review. Ms. DeDe Scanlon, 7315 Olympia Street, said the plan looks like it fits well into the Douglas Drive Corridor plan and hopes the plan is approved. She asked if the brick on the building will be painted. Mayor Harris closed the public hearing. Unofficial City Council Minutes -4- April 21, 2015 413. Public Hearing - Preliminary PUD Plan for CenterPoint Energy - continued Mr. Mike Jensen, Facility Manager for CenterPoint, answered the questions regarding hours of operation, business functions, traffic issues in the area, the security plan and materials being used on the building. He said there has not been any safety incidents at the current site and the number one goal of his company is safety. There was Council discussion regarding the Preliminary PUD Plan for CenterPoint Energy located at 6161 Golden Valley Road. MOTION made by Council Member Schmidgall, seconded by Council Member Snope to approve the Preliminary Plan for CenterPoint Energy PUD No. 122, subject to the following conditions with the addition of conditions 7 and 8 and the motion carried unanimously: 1. The plans prepared by Loucks Associates, submitted on March 20, 2015, shall become a part of this approval. 2. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the City Engineer to the Planning Manager, dated March 13, 2015, shall become a part of this approval. 3. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Fire Chief to the Planning Manager, dated March 20, 2015, shall become a part of this approval. 4. All signage must meet the requirements of the City's Sign Code (Section 4.20). 5. A park dedication fee of$68,135.52 (2% of the land market value) shall be paid prior to approval of the Final Plat. 6. The Final Plat shall include "P.U.D. No. 122" in its title. 7. The applicant shall address screening and landscaping to describe views by pedestrians bikers and car passengers including renderings. 8. Bicycle racks shall be provided. 9. This approval is subject to all other state, federal, and local ordinances, regulations, or laws with authority over this development. In addition, the Council makes the following findings pursuant to City Code Section 11.55, Subd. 5(e): 1. Quality Site Planning. The PUD plan is tailored to the specific characteristics of the site and achieves a higher quality of site planning and design than generally expected under conventional provisions of the ordinance. This PUD will allow the applicant to better utilize the site by developing the operations facility on the site. 2. Preservation. The PUD plan preserves and protects substantial desirable portions of the site's characteristics, open space and sensitive environmental features including steep slopes, trees, scenic views, creeks, wetlands, and open waters. The plan will utilize the perimeter of the site for tree plantings and stormwater management. 3. Efficient - Effective. The PUD plan includes efficient and effective use (which includes preservation) of the land. The plan brings more active uses to this large site by providing office and warehouse uses, which are compatible with the current uses on the property. 4. Compatibility. The PUD Plan results in development compatible with adjacent uses and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and redevelopment plans and goals. The proposed uses are permitted in the Industrial Zoning District. 5. General Health. The PUD plan is consistent with preserving and improving the general health, safety and general welfare of the people of the City. 6. Meets Requirements. The PUD plan meets the PUD Intent and Purpose provision and all other PUD ordinance provisions. With exception of the issues raised by the Fire Chief, the plan generally meets the requirements. Unofficial City Council Minutes -5- April 21, 2015 6. NEW BUSINESS 6A. First Consideration - Amendments to Sections 6.34: Tobacco and 10.67: Smoke Free Environment to prohibit sale and use of e-cigarettes in public and work places Chief of Police Carlson presented the staff report and answered questions from Council. MOTION made by Council Member Schmidgall, seconded by Council Member Fonnest to adopt upon first consideration Ordinance #554, Amending Sections 6.34: Tobacco and 10.67: Smoke Free Environment to prohibit sale and use of e-cigarettes in public and work places upon a vote being taken the following voted in favor of: Harris, Snope, Fonnest, Clausen and Schmidgall, the following voted against: none and the motion carried. 6B. First Consideration - Amending Salaries for Mayor and Council Members Finance Director Virnig presented the staff report and answered questions from Council. There was Council discussion regarding amending the salaries for the Mayor and Council Members. MOTION made by Council Member Clausen, seconded by Council Member Schmidgall to adopt upon first consideration Ordinance #555, Amending Salaries of Mayor and Council Members upon a vote being taken the following voted in favor of: Clausen, Snope and Harris, the following voted against: Schmidgall and Fonnest and the motion carried. 6C. METRO Blue Line Extension Update Planning Manager Zimmerman presented the staff report and answered questions from Council. MOTION made by Council Member Snope, seconded by Council Member Schmidgall to receive and file METRO Blue Line Extension Update and the motion carried unanimously. 6D. Bottineau LRT Community Works Steering Committee Appointments Planning Manager Zimmerman presented the staff report and answered questions from Council. MOTION made by Council Member Snope, seconded by Council Member Schmidgall to appoint Council Member Fonnest to the Bottineau LRT Community Works Steering Committee and the motion carried unanimously. MOTION made by Council Member Fonnest, seconded by Council Member Schmidgall to appoint Council Member Snope to the Bottineau LRT Community Works Steering Committee and the motion carried unanimously. 6E. Announcement of Meetings Some Council Members may attend the Bottineau Planning Advisory Committee-Community Working Group on April 22, 2015, at the University Research Outreach Center. Unofficial City Council Minutes -6- April 21, 2015 6E. Announcement of Meetings - continued Some Council Members may attend the Bottineau Planning Advisory Committee meeting on April 23, 2015, in the Council Conference Room. Week one of the 2015 Brush Pickup Program will begin on April 27, 2015, in the area of Highway 55 and west of Douglas Drive. Some Council Members may attend an Arcata Ribbon Cutting and Open House on April 30; 2015, from 5 to 8 pm at Arcata located at 901 Xenia Avenue South. Some Council Members may attend a meeting with residents involved in the trash hauling discussion on April 30, 2015, at 7 pm at Byerly's in Golden Valley. The 2015 Step To It Challenge will run from May 3 through May 30, 2015. Week two of the 2015 Brush Pickup Program will begin on May 4, 2015, in the area of Highway 55 and east of Douglas Drive. The next City Council meeting is May 5, 2015, at 6:30 pm. 6F. Mayor and Council Communication The Council thanked the participants who attended the Run the Valley Event as well as the Human Services Fund and city staff who helped with the event. Council Member Snope updated Council on a meeting he attended regarding the proposed work on DeCola Ponds. City Manager Burt said a DeCola Ponds Study informational discussion is tentatively scheduled for the May 12, 2015, Council/Manager meeting. Mayor Harris updated Council on the upcoming hearings at the State Capital which included the Transportation Bill. Council Member Clausen stated the Northwest Suburbs Cable Commission still has a vacancy for a Golden Valley commissioner. 7. Adjournment MOTION made by Council Member Snope, seconded by Council Member Schmidgall, and the motion carried unanimously to adjourn the meeting at 8:47 pm. Shepard Harris, Mayor ATTEST: Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk goiden MEMORANDUM 'valley Administrative Services Department 763-593-8013/763-593-3969(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting May 5, 2015 Agenda Item 3. B. Approval of City Check Register Prepared By Sue Virnig, Finance Director Summary Approval of the check register for various vendor claims against the City of Golden Valley. Attachments • Document sent via email Recommended Action Motion to authorize the payment of the bills as submitted. citfir { 9 dcn,-`4#0k 01 , vailey MEMORANDUM City Administration/Council 763-593-3991 /763-593-8109(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting May 5, 2015 Agenda Item 3. C. 1. Solicitor's License - Budget Exteriors, Inc. Prepared By Judy Nally, Administrative Assistant Summary As per City Code, any individual or group intending to go door-to-door within the City selling products, taking orders or soliciting for business or donations must be licensed by the City to do so. Attachments • Peddler/Solicitor License Application (2 pages) Recommended Action Motion to approve the solicitor's license for Budget Exteriors, Inc. Application and fee must be submitted to the City Manager's Office the Wednesday prior to the City Council Meeting. Council Meetings are normally held the first and third Tuesday of each month. PEDDLER/SOLICITOR LICENSE APPLICATION TO: Golden Valley City Council Fee Paid: $— ,5[j,00 7800 Golden Valley Road Number of Persons: Golden Valley, MN 55427 Type of License: Peddler Solicitor xxx (circle one) Enclose the sum of$ 50.00 for 6 (number) peddlers/solicitors as required by City Code of the City of Golden Valley and have complied with ail the rani dramantS of Said Code necessary for obtaining this license. /3t4dge-/-E0er1ers,Inc. 8017 Nicollet Av.S. (Business or Individual Name or Organization to be License Bloomington,MN 55420 952-887-1613 Fax 952-887-1659 1605418 41-1715912 Lic.#BC006564 Exr).Date 3/31/16 MN Business ID Federal Business ID (FEIN) Define Business MINNESOTA GORPORATIO i, I ICENSFn GENERAI C'ONTRAC`TOR (Corporation, Proprietorship, Partnership, Non-Profit, State of Incorporation or Individual) (Add Qudgellxterllers,I nc. 8017 Nicollet Av.S. Bloomington,MN 55420 City, 952-887-1613 Fax 952-887-1659 Lic.#BC006564 Exp.Date 3/31/16 (Telephone Number, including Area Code) NOW, THEREFORE, BUDGET EXTERIORS. INC. hereby makes application for (Applicant Name) City Code. period of AY 2015 through 12/31/y5, subject to the conditions and provisions of said e o 'App i rincipal Officer) Description of goods or services for sale (include prices) or indicate if soliciting donations. If more space is needed, attach additional sheets (be specific): OUR CANVAS CREW STRICTLY SETS FUTURE APPTS. FOR HOMEOWNERS WITH OUR SALES FURGE FOR FREE ESTIMATES ON OUR ENERGY EFFICIENT & EXTERIOR PRUDU=. NO GOODS ARE CARRIED FOR SALE, AND NO MONETARY TRANSACTIONS OF ANY TYPE TAKE PLACE. NOTE: If the products for sale are changed or modified, you must give the City complete information regarding such change or modification. List the names and addresses of EACH person who will be peddling or soliciting on behalf of said organization in the City, or, in the alternative, the name, address and telephone number or numbers where a responsible person of said organization will maintain a list of names and addresses of all persons engaged in peddling or soliciting in the City: (If more space is needed, attach additional sheets) STATE OF MN ) ) ss. COUNTY OF RQWEPlW ) I JEFFREY FRUTIGER of BUDGET EXTERIORS, INC. (Officer/Individual) (Name of Organization) being first duly sworn, depose and say that all the foregoing information is true to his/her own knowledge except as to matters therein stated on information and belief, and as to such matters, he/she believes them to be true. ®Sign iii." of p icant/P aI Officer) Lr Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of Af9 "t , 20 assan 'a' E. Meyer 4 Notary Public Minnesota ° ` ,My Commission Expires January 31,2016 (Signature) CiQ of go I d e nl*. MEMORANDu valley Fire Department 763-593-8079/763-593-8098(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting May 5, 2015 Agenda Item 3. C. 2. General Business License Prepared By Jill Lund, Administrative Assistant Summary As per City Code, some retail sales are required to be licensed by the City. Listed below are the Applicant, License Type and Fee of those who have submitted an application for approval. Menard's Fireworks $100.00 6800 Wayzata Boulevard Recommended Action Motion to authorize the issuance of the license as recommended by staff. Regular Meeting of the Golden Valley Planning Commission April 13, 2015 A regular meeting of the Planning Commission was held at the Golden Valley City Hall, Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota, on Monday, April 13, 2015. Chair Kluchka called the meeting to order at 7 pm. Those present were Planning Commissioners Baker, Blum, Cera, Kluchka, Segelbaum, and Waldhauser. Also present was Planning Manager Jason Zimmerman, Associate Planner/Grant Writer Emily Goellner, City Engineer Jeff Oliver, and Administrative Assistant Lisa Wittman. Commissioner Johnson was absent. 1. Approval of Minutes March 23, 2015, Regular Planning Commission Meeting MOVED by Waldhauser, seconded by Cera and motion carried unanimously to approve the March 23, 2015, minutes as submitted. 2. Informal Public Hearing — Preliminary PUD Plan — Liberty Crossing — Medicine Lake Road and Winnetka Avenue North — PU-123 Applicant: Intuitive Investments Addresses: 7751-7775 Medicine Lake Road, 2430 and 2480 Winnetka Avenue North, and 2485 Rhode Island Avenue North Purpose: To allow a 184 unit apartment building and 63 townhome units. 3. Informal Public Hearing — Property Rezoning — Liberty Crossing — Medicine Lake Road and Winnetka Avenue North —ZO14-07 Applicant: Intuitive Investments Addresses: 7751-7775 Medicine Lake Road, 2430 and 2480 Winnetka Avenue North, and 2485 Rhode Island Avenue North Purpose: To rezone the properties from Commercial and Light Industrial to High Density Residential (R-4) The Informal Public Hearings and discussion for Items 2 and 3 were combined. Zimmerman explained the applicant's request to develop a 184 unit, five story apartment building and 63 townhome units across four existing parcels near the intersection of Winnetka Avenue and Medicine Lake Road. He referred to a site plan and noted that the development would replace the existing VFW, the Asian restaurant, the car wash and the vacant SIFCO building. The Midland Auto, Dairy Queen and Walgreens buildings would remain. He reminded the Commissioners that these Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission April 13, 2015 Page 2 properties were re-designated on the General Land Use Plan Map from Commercial and Light Industrial to High Density Residential in December of 2014, and so they must now be rezoned to High Density Residential in order to be consistent. Zimmerman discussed the parking for the development. He stated that the apartment building requires 276 spaces and the applicant is providing 288 spaces (232 underground, 56 surface). The townhomes require 126 spaces and the applicant is providing 138 spaces. He added that the applicant is also providing an additional 39 spaces along the internal driveways and will need to provide 14 spaces for bicycles. Zimmerman referred to a site plan and discussed the existing and proposed access points and the pedestrian circulation plan. He stated that there have been discussions with staff and the developer about vacating a portion of Rhode Island Avenue along the east side of the project in order to build a swale to help divert water, and to do some innovative stormwater management. He explained that this is the low point and historically there have been flooding issues along Medicine Lake Road and in the DeCola Ponds system. He stated that a significant amount of flood storage is needed and that creative stormwater management, including underground storage tanks on this site, could help the overall conditions in the area and would reduce the pressure of flooding downstream. Kluchka questioned who would own the proposed swale and vacated area. Zimmerman said the details haven't been fully worked out, but the assumption is that the City would maintain ownership of the existing right-of-way and possibly the swale depending on where it is built. Zimmerman discussed the proposed rezoning of the properties. He noted that the High Density Residential zoning district allows for densities of over 12 units per acre. The proposed density for this proposal is 247 units on 10.88 acres which equals 22.7 units per acre. Blum asked about the amount of impervious surface currently on these parcels. Zimmerman stated there is approximately 64% impervious surface on these parcels now, this proposed development will drop that number down to 63%, and the percentage will drop further once the changes on Rhode Island Avenue occur. Waldhauser asked if the water issues are surface water issues or ground water issues. Zimmerman said the issues are with surface water and overflowing ponds. Segelbaum asked what other steps the City, along with the Cities of New Hope and Crystal, have been taken regarding flood mitigation. Zimmerman explained the different standards and definitions in the TP40 model versus the new Atlas 14 standards which changes the flood elevations and requires cities to plan differently for flood prone areas. He added that Golden Valley, New Hope and Crystal have been studying the situation and how to deal with the issues as properties get redeveloped. Segelbaum asked if this project is an opportunity to deal with the situation more quickly than the City otherwise would have. Zimmerman said yes, and said it would be much more difficult if all four of these parcels weren't included in the proposal. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission April 13, 2015 Page 3 Baker asked if homes in this area have been acquired due to flooding issues. Oliver said homes throughout the City have been acquired and flood proofed, but not in this area. He stated that there are 37 properties in this water sub-shed that are at risk for flood damage. He explained how the new Atlas 14 model helps provide a more accurate determination of flood levels to help offer the highest degree of protection. Baker asked if the Atlas 14 takes climate change into account. Oliver said the Atlas 14 model looks at historical data and doesn't make projections. Kluchka asked how the proposed underground parking for this development is possible given the flooding issues. Oliver said it is possible. The high point will have to be set at 2 feet above the 1% flood elevation. Waldhauser asked if the underground storage tanks would displace water that would otherwise be stored there. Oliver said he is most concerned about surface water, not groundwater and that the goal is to help resolve flooding issues. Baker asked about the capacity of the proposed underground storage tanks. He also asked if similar tanks could be used in the vacated Rhode Island Avenue area. Zimmerman said the capacity of the tanks is approximately 7 to 8 acre feet. He added that tanks cannot be used in the vacated Rhode Island Avenue area because of the location of the utilities. Cera questioned who will pay for what regarding the stormwater management. Zimmerman stated that the applicant has some responsibility to manage the stormwater on their property and that the City has some responsibilities too. He added that the City and the County will be working together with the developer to obtain grants as well. Kluchka asked what could be built on these properties under their current zoning designation without a PUD. Zimmerman stated that any commercial use could occur on the properties zoned Commercial and any light industrial use could occur on the former SIFCO property which is zoned Light Industrial. Todd Schachtman, Applicant, said as he studied the VFW parcel and the parcel to the south it became clear that this could be an opportunity to shape this gateway location. He stated that are big problems with the current water situation and this project is an opportunity to help fix the problems and he is excited to pave the way to the future in this corridor. He said there will be an area commemorating the VFW and the community room will be able to be used by the VFW. He said this area hasn't had any real development in 30 to 40 years and this project will allow options in housing. He said they are proposing market rate housing and there is potential for retail development in the future. Tom Dillon, Intuitive Invesments, Applicant, said that there hasn't been any new housing opportunities in this area for many years and that he likes the mix of housing being proposed. He stated that originally they had a much denser project but once they started to learn about the flooding issues, they changed their plans. He stated that they Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission April 13, 2015 Page 4 will reduce the flooding by approximately 20%, which is significant. He added that the south end of the site has less of a water issue, and that there will be no buildings located over the underground storage tanks. Baker asked where the entrance to the underground parking would be located. Schachtman referred to a site plan and stated that the entrance to the parking would be located on the southeast corner of the apartment building and accessed from Rhode Island Avenue. Cera asked about the size of the underground parking area. Dillon said the underground parking will be located underneath the entire apartment building as well as the surface guest parking area, and the amenity area. Waldhauser asked why there are two access points on Winnetka Avenue. Elisa Richardson, Tanek Architects, explained that the south entrance would be for access to the underground parking and the north entrance would be for visitors and guests. Kluchka asked the applicant to consider signage for the two entrances. Baker asked about the existing access road between Walgreen's property and Dairy Queen's property. Richardson stated that they don't have any intent to use that for access because it is not wide enough, it is just a part of the VFW's property. Cera asked if that access will remain open. Dillon said they may landscape the area a bit more, but it won't change from how it is currently being used. Segelbaum asked how much stormwater management is needed for this proposed development versus how much the City is asking the applicant to provide. Schachtman stated that with or without their development the problem is still there. He stated that this is the area that collects water from all over and that this proposal is an opportunity to help improve the situation. Segelbaum asked if this site could be built without the underground storage tanks. Richardson said the tanks will benefit their site, but they are larger than what their site needs. She added that the open area shown on the plans will be used as a water filtration basin for the water on their site. Nate Shea, Tanek Architects, said they aren't using the underground tanks for their site, it is for dealing with the water issues outside of their site. Baker asked about the probability of using solar energy. Schachtman said the probability is great, and that solar will absolutely be used on the apartment building. He said he is looking for ways to save energy and to be a net provider. He added that they are also looking at innovative ways to irrigate this development. Waldhauser asked about the size of the proposed units and the range of rents. Schachtman said the apartment building will have 30 studio units and 99 1-bedroom units ranging from 564 to 887 square feet, 45 2-bedroom units ranging in size from 1,073 to 1,136 square feet, and 10 3-bedroom units ranging in size from 1,334 to 1,412 square feet. He said he wants to provide a range of options and choice. He said the townhomes will have their own garages and a wide variety of floor plans and sizes. He said the rents will be typical market rate, but he doesn't know the exact amount at this time. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission April 13, 2015 Page 5 Baker asked if there will be any affordable units. Schachtman said they would consider that because they want to offer a broad spectrum of options for tenants to consider. Segelbaum asked if they will continue to own and manage the property. He said the Steven Scott Company will manage the property. Kluchka asked for a description of the exterior materials. Richardson said the materials aren't finalized yet, but there will be a blend of materials. She showed some renderings of the buildings and said they are looking at materials that will withstand time and look nice. She said there will be a wood-look product, Hardie products, and metal panel accents. She added that the townhomes and apartments would not match, but they would look like a family. Kluchka referred to the landscaping plans and asked about the applicant's approach to sidewalk connections and neighborhood connections. Schachtman said he thinks good connections are what ultimately makes a good development. He said he sees a benefit in how they connect to the rest of the area. Richardson added that the east side of the project will be more developed once they know the design of the swale. She said they want a connection with Walgreen's and that they will be working with a landscape architect to give the townhomes a front yard feel. She stated that the clubhouse area would have more screening and there will be more canopy trees where guests come in to the property. Kluchka asked about the landscaping along Winnetka Avenue. Schachtman said they will plant some evergreen trees to create a buffer. Richardson stated that they are planning to move the sidewalks in further from the street as well, to make them safer. Schachtman added that there will also be some car charging stations. Kluchka opened the public hearing. Chris Gemlo, 1925 Kelly Drive, said this looks like an exciting development, but he is not totally convinced of the flood mitigation issues yet. He said he wasn't notified of the DeCola Ponds meeting held prior to this meeting until last Saturday and that a large majority of the stakeholders were overlooked. He worries the swale will increase the flow and speed of water through the flood area into the Pennsylvania Pond. He said he hasn't seen data that the swale will be enough to alleviate the water flow, or of the sanitary conditions of the water that will flow through. He said he is curious to know who will maintain and own the swale. He referred to the portion of Rhode Island Avenue that is proposed to be vacated and said the neighbors to the south use the sidewalks along Rhode Island Avenue. He questioned the amount and type of traffic that will be created by this development and how it is being addressed. He added that there is no public playground anywhere near this development. Renee Plumart, 7500 Winnetka Heights Drive, said the SIFCO site definitely needs redevelopment and she is encouraged to see development happening. She referred to the VFW site, which is the lowest area, and questioned why the City wouldn't purchase that property and create a pond area for additional storage. She said she is also concerned about the swale expediting the flow of water and she questioned who will pay for and maintain the underground storage vaults, and if it will increase the cost of Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission April 13, 2015 Page 6 the townhomes. She said it seems that the developer is trying to cram a lot on this site and trying to do a little bit of everything and maybe not doing any of them well. She said she would like the City to consider this area for ponding instead. Carl Hoffstedt, 2450 Valders Avenue North, said the area was a swamp at one time and the low point on Medicine Lake in front of the VFW floods whenever there is intense rain. He said Walgreens had to replace a lot of their soils so this developer will probably have to do quite a bit of excavating and backfill. He said he is concerned about the underground parking with the water issues in this area and he hopes they won't have to raise the height of the proposed apartment building. He said when the Dover Hill apartment was first built it stuck out, but now that the trees have matured it helps with screening, so he would like to see more visual screening of this proposed apartment building. He said this is a significant development and it will put more traffic on Winnetka Avenue and there is also a site problem at 23rd and Winnetka Avenues so he would like to see a traffic impact study done to show the traffic conflicts. He said he expects to see a higher quality of design and hopes the number of police calls with this development will also be taken into consideration. Tim Cornelius, 8405 Patsy Lane, said he is concerned about traffic. He said he has changed his driving habits and no longer uses Duluth Street. He said he is concerned about Douglas Drive being changed to one lane in each direction. He asked if there is a plan in the future for Winnetka to have a one directional lane. He said he uses Rhode Island Avenue a lot and he is concerned Winnetka will change and he won't be able to get across it. Marti Micks, 90 Louisiana Avenue South, referred to the Laurel Avenue ponds and asked if similar ponds could be required on the northern part of this proposed PUD. Marjorie Ostrov, 1788 Maryland Avenue North, asked if any consideration has been given to requiring slightly larger units to keep this an upper to middle class area. She said tiny apartments would bring in people who usually live downtown and a larger number of units will affect the traffic. She said she wants the development to be appropriate for a suburb, rather than a downtown. Paula Longendyke, 6747 Medicine Lake Road, said with this many single and one- bedroom units there will be young people who tend to drive faster so she is concerned about traffic patterns and safety. She said there is already a lot of high density in this area. George Maxwell, 1945 Kelly Drive, said he has similar concerns about the proposed swale and the volume of water running into the pond at a quicker rate than it does now. He said generally he is for development that will help address the flood storage and he thinks it is a good idea to capitalize on those opportunities. Seeing and hearing no one else wishing to comment, Kluchka closed the public hearing. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission April 13, 2015 Page 7 Cera there are two issues. One is the DeCola ponds issue and the other is the specific development proposal. Baker asked if there were not the surface flow from the north what sort of water storage this development would require in and of itself. Oliver said he can't separate what is coming from the north from the entire watershed. He clarified that if this were an area that was not prone to flooding the applicant could typically accommodate rate control and flood control on site with a pond or a small below ground vault. He said as shown, the development is a net neutral, but in working with this developer there is an opportunity to get expanded storage. Baker asked what the difference in the capacity would be if the proposed townhomes on the northeast corner were a pond instead. Oliver said a pond in that location would have minimal impact and would be detrimental to the intersection. He said in his opinion the north end of the site would not be appropriate for ponding. Segelbaum asked Oliver to clarify what he meant by "net neutral." Oliver said the below ground storage in combination with the swale will mitigate the lost storage from this development. He reiterated that the solution will be a long process, but this is one opportunity to help the current issues. Waldhauser asked if the grade of the entire property will be raised before it is built on. Oliver said yes. Waldhauser asked if that will make the apartment building taller. Oliver said the south end of the site is already higher. Waldhauser questioned what options Golden Valley and the surrounding cities were considering to deal with the flooding problem. Oliver said they've been studying the area for four or five years and have identified the need for significant storage. He said at some point in time storage would have been developed similar to what is being proposed in this development. Kluchka asked how the swale works. Oliver said it is basically a dry stream channel. He said the intent is to serve as storage and get the water from point A to point B. Baker asked if the underground tanks require maintenance. Oliver said the maintenance issues will be addressed during the final design review. He said he anticipates that the City will own and maintain these facilities due to their regional significance. Baker said it would be helpful to see an elevation of the swale and the storage tanks. Blum referred to the comment regarding sanitation issues. Oliver said to his knowledge, there won't be sanitation issues associated with the storage tanks. Waldhauser asked if the quality of water going into the pond will be affected. Oliver said the developer will be required to meet City and Bassett Creek Watershed Commission requirements. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission April 13, 2015 Page 8 Kluchka asked for clarification on the funding for the water storage proposals. Oliver said staff along with the Cities of Crystal and New Hope have had discussions with Hennepin County and are exploring other avenues to help with funding. Baker said he doesn't want to vote on a recommendation without knowing how this will be funded. Kluchka asked about traffic volumes and future plans for Winnetka Avenue. Oliver said the City has not asked the developer to do a traffic study. He said there may be some issues during the peak hours, however this residential proposal will be less of a burden than an office use would be. He said there are no plans at this point in time for a major re-construct of Winnetka Avenue and that Hennepin County will be doing a mill and overlay on the north end of Winnetka this summer. Kluchka asked if Winnetka will ever be changed to a three-lane road. Oliver said there have been no discussions about turning Winnetka into a three-lane road. Baker asked about the pedestrian crossing at Medicine Lake Road and Winnetka and what effect this development will have. Oliver said the City strongly encourages pedestrians to cross at the intersections. He said he doesn't know that there will be an adverse impact due to this development, but he doesn't think the peaks with this proposal and the schools in the area will coincide. Baker asked if there will be any consideration of a traffic control near the south entrance. Oliver said there would more likely be traffic control at 231d and Winnetka if warrants are met, at the County's discretion. Segelbaum asked if the existing sidewalk on the east side of Rhode Island will remain or if it would be removed if Rhode Island Avenue is vacated. Zimmerman said that is still to be determined. He added that the City wants good east-west and north-south connections. Baker asked if the swale would preclude sidewalks. Zimmerman said no. Kluchka asked the applicant if there will be a playground. Schachtman said there will be a playground area, a pool, and an area for dogs. Kluchka asked Schachtman about what led to the decision regarding the size of the apartment units. Schachtman said the apartments are in-line, or slightly larger than what is commonly seen in the metro area. He added that they are proposing a lot of windows as well to allow as much natural light as possible. Kluchka said he would like to see a comparison of the size of these apartment units to other apartments in Golden Valley. Baker asked if the playground could be open to the public. Schachtman said yes, he'd be amenable to that. Waldhauser asked if there is play space at the Dover Hill apartments. Zimmerman said he didn't know. Waldhauser said she is not sure she, or future residents, want the play space at this development to be the play space for the entire area. Segelbaum asked the applicant if he is confident that they've got a handle on the soil conditions. Schachtman said yes, they've done extensive geotechnical studies on the parcels so they know what kind of soils are there. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission April 13, 2015 Page 9 Cera referred to the design of the proposed buildings and asked the applicant if they would consider adding some articulation. Schachtman said they are at the very beginning of the design process and that they will do a first class job on the design. Waldhauser asked if there is enough space on the west side of the property to plant some large trees. Schachtman said yes, there are plenty of species they could select and they've learned a lot about best practices from their past projects. Kluchka asked about police activity in the area. Zimmerman said he hasn't heard any complaints, but he would check with the Police Department. Kluchka said the Medicine Lake Road/Winnetka Avenue intersection is not in good repair for bikers and pedestrians. Oliver said he would check with the County to see if they are planning any pedestrian improvements with their overlay plans. Baker asked if Winnetka is wide enough for a bike lane. Oliver said he didn't think so without converting it to a three lane road. Kluchka asked the Commissioners if they want to recommend that a traffic study be done. Segelbaum said he thinks a study would show that the roads can handle the capacity but his concern would be the turns in and out of the development. Baker suggested they ask for a study showing how the traffic will function. Cera suggested they recommend a traffic and safety study. Kluchka said he would like to add design review and approval as a condition of approval. Waldhauser asked if the developer would be installing the sidewalk on Rhode Island. Kluchka said that sidewalk is a priority and suggested that be reviewed during the Final PUD process. Waldhauser said this is probably the best thing the City can do to start addressing the water issue. She said this is a nice use of the property and will offer a true variety in the types of houses. Baker said he often thinks about the importance of a PUD being a benefit to the City. He said there is a benefit with the developer helping address water problems. He said he also likes the fact that there is interest in developing with a green component. Segelbaum said he thinks this project is a positive enhancement to the area. Kluchka said he would like to challenge the developer around design and how this development will work with the neighborhood, how it connects to its context, and how it becomes an extension of an existing neighborhood. MOVED by Cera, seconded by Blum and motion carried unanimously to recommend approval of the Preliminary PUD Plan for Liberty Crossing PUD No. 123, subject to the following findings and conditions: Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission April 13, 2015 Page 10 Findings: 1. The PUD plan is tailored to the specific characteristics of the site and achieves a higher quality of site planning and design than generally expected under conventional provisions of the ordinance. The applicant worked closely with the City during a lengthy pre-application process—and has continued to refine the proposal—in order to accommodate the unique circumstances surrounding the site. The flexibility allowed under a PUD is necessary to achieve the outcome that will not only benefit the applicant, but the City as a whole. 2. The PUD plan preserves and protects substantial desirable portions of the site's characteristics, open space and sensitive environmental features including steep slopes, trees, scenic views, creeks, wetlands, and open waters. Given the lack of open space or other sensitive environmental features on the site today, there is little available for the applicant to preserve. However, the proposal does take advantage of the natural areas of Pennsylvania Woods and DeCola Pond B to the east and, in partnership with the City, will use a constructed swale to manage stormwater more effectively and result in the creation of additional green space within in the Rhode Island Avenue right of way. 3. The PUD plan includes efficient and effective use (which includes preservation) of the land. The proposal not only provides for an increase in residential density in an underutilized area well served by transit, but the creative inclusion of regional flood storage within the development provides a benefit to the greater area. 4. The PUD Plan results in development compatible with adjacent uses and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and redevelopment plans and goals. The use of this property for higher density residential use is compatible with the neighboring property to the east and the density being proposed is consistent with the City's revised Comprehensive Plan. 5. The PUD plan is consistent with preserving and improving the general health, safety and general welfare of the people of the City. The potential for reduction in flooding along Medicine Lake Road and within the DeCola Ponds area provides great benefit to the City and its residents. 6. The PUD plan meets the PUD Intent and Purpose provision and all other PUD ordinance provisions. The flexibility provided by the PUD allows for a better site layout and coordination between the two uses on the site. Conditions: 1. The plans prepared by Tanek, submitted March 12, 2015, shall become a part of this approval. 2. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Fire Department, dated April 8, 2015, shall become a part of this approval. 3. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Engineering Division, dated April 9, 2015, shall become a part of this approval. 4. Public bicycle racks or similar facilities for the parking/storage of a minimum of 14 bicycles shall be provided, based on a calculation of 5% of the 276 parking spaces required for the apartment building. 5. All signage must meet the requirements of the City's Sign Code (Section 4.20). 6. The Final Plat shall include "P.U.D. No. 123" in its title. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission April 13, 2015 Page 11 7. A park dedication fee of$60,100, or 2% of the land value, shall be paid before release of the Final Plat. 8. A traffic, pedestrian and safety study shall be done as a part of the Final PUD proposal. 9. The application will be subject to design review and approval that would include elevations, materials, and landscaping. 10.This approval is subject to all other state, federal, and local ordinances, regulations, or laws with authority over this development. Waldhauser questioned if the recommended traffic and safety study should go with this proposal or if the Commission should send a letter to the City Council saying this area seems to have some issues that should be addressed. Segelbaum said the traffic and safety impact is tied to this development. Oliver said typically the City will perform the traffic study with the developer posting escrow to cover the costs. Segelbaum said he would like the study to be limited to the issues they've discussed. MOVED by Waldhauser, seconded by Segelbaum and motion carried unanimously to recommend approval of rezoning the properties at 7751-7775 Medicine Lake Road, 2480 Winnetka Avenue North, and 2485 Rhode Island Avenue North from Commercial to High Density Residential (R-4) and the property at 2430 Winnetka Avenue North from Light Industrial to High Density Residential (R-4). 4. Informal Public Hearing - General Land Use Plan Map Amendment— 9000 and 9050 Golden Valley Road — CPAM-56 Applicant: City of Golden Valley Addresses: 9000 and 9050 Golden Valley Road Purpose: To change the designation on the General Land Use Plan Map from Commercial to Residential High Density. Goellner stated that the City Council discussed a senior housing proposal at their March 10 Council/Manager meeting and have directed staff to start the General Land Use Plan Map amendment process to re-guide the vacant properties located at 9000 and 9050 Golden Valley Road from Commercial to High Density Residential. She referred to a site map and stated that these two properties are located in the Highway 55 Redevelopment Area. She explained that the Metropolitan Council has said that the number of households in Golden Valley is expected to increase 17% by the year 2040 and that the population is expected to be 24,300 by 2040. To accommodate this growth, the City is considering increasing housing density in appropriate locations. Kluchka asked if the property to the west at 9110 Golden Valley Road is designated Medium Density. Goellner said yes. Kluchka asked if there is future development planned for that property. Zimmerman said the City has some interest in seeing that property redeveloped, but there is not an interested seller at this point. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission April 13, 2015 Page 12 Segelbaum stated that there has been discussion regarding the Highway 55 intersection as part of previous proposals. He asked if re-designating these properties to High Density Residential would help support some of the initiatives and if that could be used as funding for the TIF district in this area. Kluchka asked if the pedestrian overlay is coming back to a future agenda for discussion. Zimmerman stated that the Council has asked that a pedestrian overlay district be developed potentially for this area, but for use in other areas as well. He stated that there is a redevelopment area over all the parcels in this area. He said there are different types of TIF districts so it depends on what types of developments are located in this area. Segelbaum said he is concerned about the impact to the intersection as it relates to two high density developments. He said he wants to make sure that there is support for improving that intersection. Zimmerman said the City has a concern about safety and that the slip ramp design and improvements will be addressed as part of the Golden Villas project. Kluchka opened the public hearing. Jerad Ducklow 7002 6th Street North, Oakdale, representing the property owner at 9000 Golden Valley Road, said he is a real estate broker and is currently listing this property. He said he has had suitors for this property. One of them happened to be a potential residential property, but there have been others interested as well. He said when he received the hearing notice for this meeting he was rather shocked and the timing of it seems ironic because he has been discussing with the City other potential uses. He said he is not adamantly opposed to the re-designation, he just wants to make sure it is being done for the right reasons. He said he wants everything taken into consideration because when smaller parcels like this are zoned high density residential there are certain limitations. He said he thinks everyone wants this property to be redeveloped and used to its fullest potential, but he questions the timing of this proposal. Seeing and hearing no one else wishing to comment, Kluchka closed the public hearing. Segelbaum asked if the normal requirements regarding notification were followed. Zimmerman said yes. He explained that the City Council asked the Planning Commission to look at this area about a month or two ago to give them some initial feedback about the land uses. He said the Council wanted to pursue high density housing in this area. Baker asked who wants this area to be housing and who wants it to be open to potential commercial uses. Zimmerman said the Council wants these properties to be high density housing. Baker asked what is motivating that desire. Zimmerman said there is some concern as this area transitions to a more pedestrian friendly area that auto oriented uses wouldn't be as friendly to a pedestrian, mixed-use area. Waldhauser said it is hard to envision this area as a pedestrian friendly area. Baker asked if this is the right way to do this. He said he would like to see a mini West End type of project with real mixed-use. He said this feels piecemeal to him. Cera asked what would happen if the Planning Commission recommended denial. Zimmerman said the Council directed staff to bring this to the Commission for review. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission April 13, 2015 Page 13 Segelbaum asked if these properties are buildable as a high density project. Zimmerman stated that the High Density Residential Zoning District allows for 12 units per acre. Segelbaum asked for clarification of how the properties can be used right now. Zimmerman reiterated that if these properties are un-occupied for a period of one year they would be considered non-conforming, but if they are continually being marketed for a commercial use or used as a commercial use, they can continue to be used as commercial properties. Cera questioned if the Medium-High Residential designation would be better. Blum said the Planning Commission has discussed recently where higher density would be appropriate. He said it seems that the intersection of two major roadways is a good place to have growth and density and that is where this is. He said this is also a gateway location where the City might not want underdeveloped, vacant properties. Segelbaum agreed and said he thinks this is a right place for this use. Baker also agreed. Waldhauser asked about the status of Bus Rapid Transit on Highway 55. Zimmerman said there was a study done which indicated this could be a favorable corridor, but there is no funding available at this time. Waldhauser said it would be more exciting to have a mixed use proposal here. Zimmerman noted that the R-3 and R-4 zoning district also allow for first floor retail with a Conditional Use Permit. Baker said he is ok with recommending approval of the proposed re-designation but he really feels it is not getting the City where it wants to go. He said he would like the Council to take the initiative to be more bold than this. Kluchka said historically the Planning Commission has commented on spot zoning without taking into consideration a larger area with a plan, not rezoning one or two properties with the hope of change. He added that he is a big proponent of finding places for higher density housing and this is probably a good place for it assuming it can be made pedestrian friendly. Baker said he would like the minutes to reflect that the Commission is recommending the Council think bigger, and more dramatic in this area and to use some higher risk, more influential tools they have at their disposal. Blum said he thinks starting small might be a good first step in the right direction. MOVED by Cera, seconded by Waldhauser and motion carried unanimously to recommend approval of changing the designation on the General Land Use Plan Map from Commercial to High Density Residential for the properties at 9000 and 9050 Golden Valley Road. --Short Recess-- 5. Reports on Meetings of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority, City Council, Board of Zoning Appeals and other Meetings No reports were given. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission April 13, 2015 Page 14 6. Other Business • Revisions to Planning Commission By-laws Zimmerman stated that the City Council has revised its Guidelines for Advisory Commissions, Committees, Boards and Councils to limit the terms of office for the Chair and Vice-Chair of each body to a maximum of two years. He stated that the Planning Commission By-laws need to be amended to reflect this change. Waldhauser noted that there are several places in the by-laws where it states that a Planning Commission representative makes presentations of its recommendations at the City Council meetings, which they no longer do. Segelbaum asked about the intent of this amendment. Zimmerman stated that the intent is to limit the amount of time any one commissioner can be a chair or vice chair. The Commissioner's discussed the language in the proposed amendment. The consensus of the Planning Commission was to amend the proposed language to state that the chair and vice chair shall not serve more than two consecutive, one year terms. MOVED by Cera, seconded by Segelbaum and motion carried unanimously to amend Section 11 of the by-laws to by adding the following: Commissioners shall not serve as chair or vice chair for more than two consecutive, one year terms. • Council Liaison Report No report was given. 7. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 10:28 pm. Charles D. Segelbaum, Secretary Lisa Wittman, Administrative Assistant MINUTES Human Rights Commission (HRC) Perpich Center for Arts Education 6125 Olson Memorial Highway v , Golden Valley, Minnesota ` March 26, 2015 Commissioners present: Teresa Martin, Chair Jonathan Burris Carla Johnson Michael Pristash Payton Perkins Andrew Ramlet Commissioners absent: Adam Buttress Simon Gotlieb Susan Phelps Staff: Tom Burt, City Manager Stacy Carlson, Police Chief Judy Nally, Administrative Assistant The meeting was convened at 6:40 pm by Chair Martin after a tour of the Perpich Center for Arts Education auditorium. Introductions Commissioners and staff introduced themselves. Approval of February 24, 2015, Regular Meeting Minutes Motion by Commissioner Johnson, second by Commissioner Pristash to approve the February 24, 2015, minutes. Motion carried 6-0. Council Updates No updates were presented. Old Business October 22, 2015, (or October 8) HRC Conversations Planning Update Pristash reported that Sergeant Grant Snyder from the Minneapolis Police Department will attend the April 28 meeting. Pristash stated he is pre-meeting Snyder to discuss an overview/scope of his role and asked Commissioners to let Knauss know if they are interested in participating in the meeting. Snyder will also serve on the event panel. Preventing Genocide Program Planning Update Johnson reviewed the Committee meeting she attended. This is the first joint annual event presented by the Crystal, Golden Valley, New Hope and Robbinsdale Human Rights Commissions. The event will be held on April 18 from 10-11:30 am at the Crystal Community Center. Golden Valley has volunteered to provide refreshments, help with room set-up (9 am) and clean-up (noon). The plan is to introduce the Human Rights Commissions and speakers. After the program a '/2 hour timeslot is available for Q&A. Cards will be provided for questions. Some questions have been created in case they are needed. Wrap-up will be at 11:30 am. Evaluations will be distributed to Human Rights Commission March 26,2015 Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 4 participants. Tables will be available for use by the HRCs for distribution of information. Ramlet (not available for clean-up) and Pristash volunteered to be the Golden Valley HRC representatives. Staff will be requested to update information about the event on the website and Facebook. The program was listed in the upcoming events section of the March/April City newsletter and is on the website. Martin will bring the evaluation and pledge to the City to get copied prior to the event. The City of Crystal may provide some off-duty police officers for security. Martin asked Commissioners to think about possible topics/issues that the HRCs could do as a joint program in the future. HRC members will be attending the April 7 City Council meeting to accept the Proclamation for Genocide Awareness and Prevention Month. Burris and Martin will attend the Council Meeting. Staff will provide a copy of the proclamation to bring to the event and also post on the website. May 14, 2015, HRC Conservations Planning Update: Blank Slate Theatre production of "bottom" and follow-up discussion Prior to the meeting the Commissioners toured the Perpich Center for Arts Education auditorium, Staff reported that Phelps contacted Armstrong and Hopkins High Schools and they will put information about the play on the school calendar and newsletter. Staff suggested that Phelps also notify Robbinsdale Cooper High School. Martin stated she provided information to the Crystal, New Hope and Robbinsdale Human Rights Commissions so they could distribute information about the play in their communities. The Commissioners discussed the capacity of the auditorium which is not to exceed 170. Some members expressed concern that depending upon the publicity, the event may exceed the capacity. Carlson stated that when she attended a previous meeting in the auditorium a small room was available for overflow. Commissioners had questions about publicity for the event (website, newsletter and Facebook). They questioned if the company is providing handbills and if the HRC is doing programs. Martin will request Phelps email Knauss an updated status of the plans so far and request that Knauss forward it on the Commissioners. The item will be added to the April 28, 2015, meeting for discussion. Discuss HRC Traveling Meeting Dates/Times (Covenant Village) Martin is organizing the traveling meeting which will be held on May 26, 2015 at Covenant Village. Motion by Commissioner Burris, second by Commissioner Pristash to hold the traveling meeting on May 26, 2015, at Covenant Village at 6:30 pm. HRC Banner Update Staff distributed copies of the proposed designs for the banner. In the interest of time, it was the consensus of the HRC to discuss this at the next meeting. Motion by Commissioner Pristash, second by Commissioner Burris to table discussion of the banner until the April 28, 2015, meeting. Motion carried 6-0. Human Rights Commission March 26,2015 Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 4 Donut Talk: MN Demographics Update Staff reported that Phelps was unable to attend the Donut Talk which was held at the Crystal Community Center. Pristash will contact the speaker and request a copy of his presentation and provide it to the HRC members. Discuss Potential Event Partnership for future Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Holiday In the interest of time, it was the consensus of the HRC to discuss this at the next meeting. Motion by Commissioner Pristash, second by Commissioner Johnson to table discussion of the MLK Holiday event until the April 28, 2015, meeting. Motion carried 6-0. Presentation of 2014 Annual Police Department Report Stacy Carlson, Police Chief, reviewed the 2014 Annual Police Department Report. Carlson answered questions about staffing, crime statistics, demographics, crime prevention, block clubs, neighborhood watch, community outreach, Night to Unite, Citizen Academy, Jr. Police Academy, program/identity theft, elder abuse seminars, Police and Fire in the Parks, Bike Rodeo, Police/Fire Open House, Community Bike-A-Long, Bike patrol, Coffee with a Cop, Crime Prevention Board, feedback from the community, police reserves, hiring process, booking procedures and costs, joint powers agreements with other police agencies, prosecuting attorney, department diversity, crisis intervention and in-service training funding, squad cameras, and future use of body cameras. The Commissioners asked how the HRC could be more effective in the community. Carlson stated that having the HRC attend the Citizen Academy may be helpful. She also suggested notifying the HRC about future job openings so they can forward the postings to different venues. The Commissioners thanked the Chief for the update. HRC By-law Changes Martin reviewed the by-law changes about the two year maximum term for the Chair and Vice-Chair and work plan. Motion by Commissioner Pristash, second by Commissioner Johnson to approve the by-law changes as presented. Motion carried 6-0. Meeting rules Martin reviewed some meeting rules for discussion and others were added: Keep phones off or on mute or vibrate. If you have to take a phone call take it out of the room so it is not distracting. If someone has something to say Commissioners should allow the person to finish their question or statement before interrupting them. Commissioners should wait to be recognized by the Chair. When a motion is made and voted on the Chair should say motion granted or motion denied. The Chair should be the last person to rule on the motion. Burt stated the Commission should decide how formal or informal they want to conduct their meetings. Most Commissions use a relaxed parliamentary procedure. Commissioner asked if a cheat sheet of Roberts's Rules is available and if they could be provided with an example. Martin will check with Knauss for an example. Commissioners discussed having an overview of Roberts's Rules and conduct during meetings. It was suggested that once a year in May the Commission will discuss how they would like to conduct meetings, state the ground rules for running meetings and review Commission conduct during meetings. Burt stated that staff will coordinate an annual training session for the Commission Chairs, Human Rights Commission March 26,2015 Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 4 Adjourn Motion by Commissioner Burris, second by Commissioner Johnson to adjourn the meeting at 8 pm. Motion carried 6-0. Follow-up Items: • Commissioners to let Knauss know if they are interested in attending meeting with Sergeant Snyder. • Martin requesting that Phelps email Knauss regarding updated Blank Slate theatre production. • Pristash to contact MN Demographics Update speaker about obtaining copy of presentation. • Martin's request of Robert's Rules cheat sheet from Knauss. • Staff coordination of annual Commission Chair training. Teresa Martin, Chair ATTEST: Chantell Knauss, Staff Liaison Approved by HRC: Respectfully submitted, Judy Nally, Administrative Assistant Human Rights Commission March 26,2015 Meeting Minutes Page 4 of 4 Minutes of a Regular Meeting of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals February 24, 2015 A regular meeting of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals was held on Tuesday, February 24, 2015, at City Hall, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. Vice Chair Perich called the meeting to order at 7:05 pm. Those present were Members Maxwell (arrived at 7:12), Nelson, Orenstein, Perich and Planning Commission Representative Blum. Also present were Associate Planner/Grant Writer Emily Goellner, and Administrative Assistant Lisa Wittman, I. Approval of Minutes — January 27, 2015 Regular Meeting MOVED by Nelson, seconded by Orenstein and motion carried unanimously to approve the January 27, 2015, minutes as submitted. II. The Petition(s) are: 13XX Flag Avenue Richard Schneider, Applicant Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Single Family Zoning District, Subd. 11(A)(1) Front Yard Setback Requirements • 22.4 ft. off of the required 35 ft. to a distance of 12.6 ft. at its closest point to the front yard (north) property line. Purpose: To allow for the construction of new house. Goellner referred to a site plan of the property and stated that the Applicant is proposing to build a new home on the existing vacant lot. She explained that the Applicant is requesting a variance from the front setback requirements due to the steep slope on the west side of the property, a large drainage and utility easement on the east side of the property, and the unique shape of the front yard causing the need for a long driveway. Nelson asked if the existing duplex to the west has a Flag Avenue address or a Plymouth Avenue address. Goellner said it has a Plymouth Avenue address. Blum asked if the peak of the slope is located between the subject property and the duplex to the west. Goellner said yes and explained that there is about a 24-foot difference in elevation from the proposed house to the existing duplex. Orenstein asked if the owners of the duplex have expressed any objections. Goellner said no. Perich asked if the guidelines were different when the subdivision creating this lot was approved. Goellner explained that during the subdivision process the Applicant showed a Minutes of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals February 24, 2015 Page 2 home on their plans that met the setback requirements. She added that the easement on the east side of the property wasn't as large at that time. Maxwell asked if the proposed location of the house is really the only buildable spot. Goellner said it may be possible to build the house in a different location but the costs might be insurmountable. Maxwell asked if the current landowner did the original subdivision. Goellner said no. Nelson asked if the owner of the duplex did the original subdivision. Goellner said yes, the person who owned the duplex at the time was the Applicant for the Subdivision. Blum asked if the slope is a natural or created hill. Goellner said it is a naturally occurring hill. Dick Schneider, Applicant, referred to the site plans and stated that there is approximately 60 feet from the buildable area to Flag Avenue. He said that the spirit of the front setback requirement has to do with the distance from the curb. He said that if he builds his home where he is proposing it will save trees, shorten the driveway, and place the home further away from the existing duplex. Perich asked about the portion of the driveway that will not be located on the property. Schneider said it will be located on the unbuildable property to the north out to Flag Avenue. Maxwell asked if trees would need to be removed in order to meet the setback requirements. Schneider said yes, 8 to 10 trees would have to be removed. Nelson asked the Applicant if he knew where the buildable portion of the lot was located when he purchased the property. Schneider stated that the owner at the time didn't know how the house would fit within the building envelope. He stated that he is proposing a modest house in the location that will work best. Maxwell opened the public hearing. Seeing and hearing no one wishing to comment, Maxwell closed the public hearing. Nelson said she is sensitive to front yard setbacks, but she realizes the proposed new house won't have much impact. She stated that if the proposed house met the setback requirements it would have a bigger impact on the duplex to the west. She added that this landowner did not create the issue. Perich agreed and said the proposal makes a lot of sense and is reasonable for this area. Blum said he is in favor of the request and thinks the Board has addressed the factors they need to when considering variances. He said the variance is in harmony with the purposes and intent of the ordinances, the variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, the proposal puts the property to use in a reasonable manner, there are unique circumstances to the property that were not created by the landowner, and the variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The Board agreed. Minutes of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals February 24, 2015 Page 3 MOVED by Nelson, seconded by Perich and motion carried unanimously to approve the variance request for 22.4 ft. off of the required 35 ft. to a distance of 12.6 ft. at its closest point to the front yard (north) property line to allow for the construction of new house. 1300 Toledo Avenue North Beth Trautman (Cottage Home Designs), Applicant Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Single Family Zoning District, Subd. 11(A)(3) Side Yard Setback Requirements • 5.5 ft. off of the required 12.5 ft. to a distance of 6 ft. at its closest point to the side yard (north) property line. Purpose: To allow for the construction of a garage addition. Goellner referred to a survey of the property and explained the Applicant's request to construct a garage addition. She noted that the applicant is also proposing an addition to the rear of the house but that won't require variances. She explained that the Applicant has stated that the unique circumstances with this property are that the house was built with a one-stall garage, the lot is long and deep but not very wide, and placing a new garage near the rear of the home will create a longer driveway. Nelson asked about the size of the proposed new garage. Goellner said it will be 22 ft. x 22 ft. in size. Nelson asked if the Applicant is proposed to expand to the existing breezeway. Goellner said the Applicant is proposing to rebuild, but not expand the breezeway. Paul Stepnes, Cottage Home Designs, Applicant, said he found the original house plans in the attic which showed a two-stall garage. If the house had been built the way the plans indicated, they wouldn't need a variance today. He stated that they are proposing a modest garage that will keep within the design and feel of the house. Beth Trautman, Cottage Home Designs, Applicant, stated that they are proposing to reduce the size of the existing breezeway. She added that they are trying to restore the home and modernize it. She referred to the survey of the property and stated that there is a large tree behind the existing garage so they don't want to move the garage further back on the property. Stepnes added that there is also a ponding area in the back yard. Maxwell opened the public hearing. Seeing and hearing no one wishing to comment, Maxwell closed the public hearing. Nelson stated that the Board usually tries to accommodate two-stall garages. She said if the proposed garage were placed anywhere else on the property it would be more impactful. She stated that the proposal is reasonable, it is in harmony with the purposes and intent of the ordinances, it is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, and the proposal is reasonable. She added that the unique circumstances in this case are how Minutes of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals February 24, 2015 Page 4 the house was originally placed on the lot, and the fact that there is only a one-stall garage currently on the property. Orenstein asked about the photos submitted by the Applicant. Stepnes explained that the photos he submitted are examples of other homes in the area with a similar garage to what they are proposing. Perich noted that if the Applicant built a new garage further back on the lot it would have a longer driveway which would not fit in as well with the neighborhood. MOVED by Nelson, seconded by Perich and motion carried unanimously to approve the variance request for 5.5 ft. off of the required 12.5 ft. to a distance of 6 ft. at its closest point to the side yard (north) property line to allow for the construction of a garage addition. III. Other Business No other business was discussed. IV. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 7:40 pm. George Maxwell, Chair Lisa Wittman, Administrative Assistant ASSISTED LIVING COVENANT VILLAGE Woodside Terrace 5800 St.Croix Avenue North OF GOLDEN VALLEY Golden Valley,MN 55422 A Covenant Retirement Community 763.546.6125 phone•763.546.8529 fax RESIDENTIAL LIVING ASSISTED LIVING Covenant Village MEMORY SUPPORT 5800 St. Croix Avenue North • Golden Valley, MN 55422 Heritage House 5825 St.Croix Avenue North 763.546.6125 phone • 763.546.8529 fax Golden Valley,MN 55422 763.544.1555 phone•763.544.8032 fax SKILLED NURSING E C F: d E Colonial Acres 5825 St.Croix Avenue North APR 2 7 2015 Golden Valley,MN 55422 763.544.1555 phone•763.544.8032 fax 4/24/15 gY: - Greetings Mayor Harris, I'm writing you to inform you of my resignation from the Human Services Fund Committee as of today 4/24/15. My commitments at work and home are not allowing me enough time to serve the committee in a capacity that serves the committee well. Thank you Mayor Harris for allowing me the opportunity to serve on the Human Services Fund Committee. I have enjoyed serving and volunteering. Regards, Craig McDaniels Director of Sales 763-732-1523 Covenant Village of Golden Valley Residential Living ccmcdaniels(a-)-covenantretirement.ora www.covenantretirement.com City of' MEMORANDUM �J;-Olden valley Administrative Services Department 763-593-8013/763-593-3969(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting May 5, 2015 Agenda Item 3. F. Approve Requests for Beer and/or Wine at Brookview Park Prepared By Kris Luedke, City Clerk Summary As per City Code Section 10.83, Subd. 2 I. "No person shall possess, display, consume or use alcoholic beverages on any City park property, unless permission is granted by the Council." As part of the application process for a Facilities Use Permit to use the large and small picnic shelters at Brookview Park the applicant has the option to pay an additional $25 to be able to serve beer and/or wine. Attached is a list of the individuals and/or organizations who have requested that option. Attachments • Beer and/or wine request list (1 page) Recommended Action Motion to approve the requests for beer and/or wine at Brookview Park as recommended by staff. BEER AND/OR WINE REQUEST LIST INDIVIDUAL OR ORGANIZATION CC DATE DATE TIME SHELTER APPROVED Paula Pentel 05-10 5 pm - 10 pm Large 05-05-15 Robert Paulus 05-17 5 pm - 10 pm Large 05-05-15 Nickki Bunting 06-03 5 pm - 10 pm Large 05-05-15 Cesar Vargas 06-14 5 pm - 10 pm Small 05-05-15 Ted Tammearu - Estonian Society 06-21 11 am -4 pm Small 05-05-15 Nicole Magandy - TCF Finance 06-23 11 am -4 pm Large 05-05-15 Nicole Magandy - TCF Finance 06-23 11 am -4 pm Small 05-05-15 Nicole Magandy - TCF Finance 06-23 5 pm - 10 pm Large 05-05-15 Nicole Magandy - TCF Finance 06-23 5 pm - 10 pm Small 05-05-15 Kirsten Fogt - Messerli & Kramer 06-25 11 am - 4 pm Large 05-05-15 Kirsten Fogt - Messerli & Kramer 06-25 5 pm - 10 pm Large 05-05-15 Jean Steman 07-23 11 am - 4 pm Large 05-05-15 Jane Murray 08-23 11 am - 4 pm Large 05-05-15 Mike Defo - TCF Bank 08-28 11 am -4 pm Large 05-05-15 Melissa Bailey - Liesch Associates 09-12 5 pm - 10 pm Large 05-05-15 city 0 j*AW golden 't 'vir MEMORANDUM valley Physical Development Department 763-593-8030/763-593-3988(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting May 5, 2015 Agenda Item 3. G. Proclamation for Arbor Day and Arbor Month Prepared By Al Lundstrom, Park Maintenance Supervisor Tim Teynor, Assistant City Forester Summary The City of Golden Valley was recently awarded the 2014 Tree City USA Award. It is the 281h consecutive year Golden Valley has received the national recognition. Tree City USA recognizes communities that have proven their commitment to an effective, ongoing community forestry program. Tree City USA is sponsored in cooperation with the National Association of State Foresters and the USDA Forest Service. To become a Tree City USA, a community must meet four standards: 1. Operate a forestry division 2. Have a tree ordinance 3. Manage a comprehensive community forestry program 4. Observe Arbor Day This year's Arbor Day activities will be celebrated with the fourth grade class at the Good Shepherd School located at 145 Jersey Avenue South on May 15 at 9:30 am. The event will include a short presentation at the school about the value of urban trees. Staff will award prizes to the winners of the Arbor Day poster contest followed by a recitation of the City's Arbor Day Proclamation. The fourth grade class will end the program by planting a tree on school grounds and staff will distribute packaged tree seedlings for each of the fourth grade students to take home and plant. Staff has conducted Arbor Day programs at several elementary schools throughout the community in the past. Attachments • Proclamation for Arbor Day - May 15, 2015 and Arbor Month - May 2015 (1 page) Recommended Action Motion to adopt a Proclamation for Arbor Day- May 15, 2015 and Arbor Month - May 2015 in the City of Golden Valley. CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY PROCLAMATION FOR ARBOR DAY - MAY 15, 2015 AND ARBOR MONTH - MAY 2015 WHEREAS, Golden Valley's urban forest treasures were a significant attraction to early settlers because of their usefulness and the beautiful environment they provided; and WHEREAS, trees are an increasingly vital resource in Golden Valley today, enriching our lives by purifying air and water, helping conserve soil and energy, serving as recreational settings, providing habitat for wildlife of all kinds, and making our community more livable; and WHEREAS, trees are a renewable resource giving us paper, wood for our homes, fuel for our fires and countless other wood products; and WHEREAS, trees in our city increase property values, enhance the economic vitality of business areas, and beautify our community; and WHEREAS, trees, wherever they are planted, are a source of warmth and security; and WHEREAS, Golden Valley has been recognized as a Tree City USA by the National Arbor Day Foundation and desires to continue its urban forestry efforts; NOW, THEREFORE, I, Shepard Harris, Mayor of the City of Golden Valley, do hereby proclaim May 15, 2015 as Arbor Day and May as Arbor Month in the City of Golden Valley, and urge all citizens to support efforts to protect our trees and woodlands and to support our City's urban forestry program; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the Golden Valley City Council urges all citizens to become more aware of the importance of trees to their well-being, and to plant, nurture, protect, and wisely use Golden Valley's great treasure of trees. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the great seal of the City of Golden Valley to be affixed this 5t" day of May 2015. Shepard M. Harris, Mayor C i tV0 : NDUMc den 40 �' l '��" 'k4 ""A Ha �y'il � valle Y Police Department 763-593-8079/763-593-8098(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting May 5, 2015 Agenda Item 3. H. Second Consideration -Amendments to Sections 6.34: Tobacco and 10.67: Smoke Free Environment to prohibit sale and use of e-cigarettes in public and work places Prepared By Stacy Carlson, Chief of Police Summary In 2014, the Minnesota state legislature amended Minnesota Statute Chapter 144, the Clean Indoor Air Act, to define "e-cigarettes" and ban their use from certain state-owned facilities. E-cigarettes are not specifically defined in the Golden Valley City Code, nor are they specifically included in the prohibited use or sale in these sections. The first consideration of this ordinance was presented at the April 21, 2015, City Council meeting. If Council adopts the ordinance on second consideration, it will be effective upon publication. Attachments • Ordinance#554, Amending Sections 6.34: Tobacco and 10.67: Smoke Free Environment (2 pages) Recommended Action Motion to adopt upon second consideration Ordinance #554, Amending Sections 6.34: Tobacco and 10.67: Smoke Free Environment to prohibit sale and use of e-cigarettes in public and work places. ORDINANCE NO. 554, 2ND SERIES AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE Amending Section 6.34: Tobacco and Section 10.67: Smoke Free Environment with the addition of E-Cigarettes The City Council for the City of Golden Valley hereby ordains: Section 1. City Code Section 6:34, Subdivision 2(K) is hereby amended by adding the following sentence after the first sentence: For purposes of this Section, the definition of smoking includes the use of electronic cigarettes, including the inhaling and exhaling of vapor from any electronic delivery device as defined in Minnesota State Statute 609.685, Subd. 1. Section 2. City Code Section 6:34, Subdivision 2(L) is hereby amended to read as follows: L. Tobacco or Tobacco Products: Tobacco and tobacco products includes cigarettes, e-cigarettes and any product containing, made, or derived from tobacco that is intended for human consumption, whether chewed, smoked, absorbed, dissolved, inhaled, snorted, sniffed, or ingested by any other means, or any component, part, or accessory of a tobacco product; cigars; cheroots; stogies; perique; granulated, plug cut, crimp cut, ready rubbed, and other smoking tobacco; snuff; snuff flour; cavendish; plug and twist tobacco; fine cut and other chewing tobaccos; shorts; refuse scraps, clippings, cuttings and sweepings of tobacco; and other kinds and forms of tobacco. Tobacco excludes any tobacco product that has been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for sale as a tobacco cessation product, as a tobacco dependence product, or for other medical purposes, and is being marketed and sold solely for such an approved purpose. Section 3. City Code Section 6:34, Subdivision 2(M) is hereby amended to read as follows: M. Tobacco-Related Devices: Tobacco-related devices includes any tobacco product as well as a pipe, e-cigarette, rolling papers, ashtray, or other device intentionally designed or intended to be used in a manner which enables the chewing, sniffing or smoking of tobacco or tobacco products. Section 4. City Code Section 10.67, Subdivision 2(G) is hereby amended by adding the following sentence after the first sentence: For purposes of this Section, the definition of smoking includes the use of electronic cigarettes, including the inhaling and exhaling of vapor from any electronic delivery device as defined in Minnesota State Statute 609.685, Subd. 1. Ordinance No. 554 - continued Section 5. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 6.99 and 10.99 entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 6. This Ordinance shall take effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law. Adopt by the City Council this 5t" day of May, 2015. /s/Shepard M. Harris Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: /s/Kristine A. Luedke Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk . I �� ,� �� "� �� J0 �� ~~� �� . �� J� �� =^~~ valley � �� ][][�~ l�l�l�l^c��^rU's ��e��rt��e]�t _ � � =' 763-593-8030/763-693-3988(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting May 5' 2015 Agenda Item 3. |. Support for Application Submittal for Hennepin County 2015 Bikeway Participation Program Prepared By Marc Nevinski, Director ofPhysical Development Eric Eckman, Public Works Specialist Summary Hennepin County has established a Bikeway Participation Program to support the development and enhancement ofthe bikeway network au identified on the Hennepin County Bicycle Transportation Plan (Bike Plan) Map. Recently, there has been some interest in exploring the possibility of studying the 1-394 South Frontage Road corridor (Wayzata Boulevard/Quentin Avenue) for bikeway improvements and connections between Cedar Lake Road and Wirth Parkway. This corridor is identified as a planned bikeway on the County's Bike Plan Map and would serve to connect local and regional trails and also link the West End development in 5t. Louis Park to Minneapolis through Golden Valley. Staff from the cities of Golden Valley, 3t. Louis Park and Minneapolis recently met with Hennepin County staff regarding bike and pedestrian connections and improvements along this corridor and the potential for Hennepin County participation in a feasibility study. Hennepin County encouraged the cities to apply for funding through the Bikeway Participation Program. Consensus was that Golden Valley would take the lead in applying for the grant and that the other cities would offer letters of support and, if funded, would participate in the project. As part of the Bikeway Participation Program, Hennepin County isoffering a 5O9Scontribution up to a maximum of$20,000 for a feasibility study, Applications were due on April 17, and due to the timing of the recent meetings, staff went ahead and submitted an application to meet the deadline. Although a resolution of support from the City is not needed for the application, staff feels it is important to have Council support for this study, ifgrant funding is awarded. Hennepin County will notify applicants of their selections in late May 2015. Attachments • Location Map (1 page) • Resolution Authorizing Submittal for the Hennepin County Bikeway Participation Program (1 page) Recommended Action Motion to adopt Resolution Authorizing Submittal for the Hennepin County Bikeway Participation Program. Bike and Pedestrian Facilities °o iirch Bikeway Feasibility Study Corridor Golden Valley "• Pond Regional Trails Minneapolisp�`"'y cid �a Local Trails and Sidewalks Saint Louis Park 0 G rj'rol Tr Q S4n$afRdg� to Wayzata Blvd Interstate-394 r ~~ Wayzata Blvd S Frontage Rd `# -n Tyrol Crat m South Tyrol e��e^ Target 1 y maw Pond Corporation West > d '9�on gor'4g+ n tyrolTr a m End as/e,pd Brownie g w Lake N Z Douglas Ave V Z y Douglas Ave co N N H a > a c a 3 .oe A „ GZ 1_0a ed y old Cedar Lake e a P ,0 �sa Cedar `af.P w o 9m �a Cm h/ghw�Rd Avg aha �o wF�nbinLake W 23rd Stere � �`ake ice,,La ti Hennepin County Bicycle Transportation Plan Ra -7 Cederwoo Planned Bikeway System - February 2015 OCP v0 W11 Q' Twin 3 Lakes } I� m - o Print Date: 4/17/2015 e G'i J iJ Sources: golden�� 2015 p i kewa�/ -Hennepin County Surveyors Office for e Property Lines(2015)&Aerial Photography(2012). valley�t T -City of Golden Valley for all other layers. Y fY Participation Program 0 495 870 ,740 Feet Resolution 15-37 May 5, 2015 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SUBMITTAL FOR THE HENNEPIN COUNTY BIKEWAY PARTICIPATION PROGRAM WHEREAS, funding is available from Hennepin County for the 2015 Bikeway Participation Program to support the development and enhancement of the bikeway network as identified on the County Bike Plan Map, and WHEREAS, the City of Golden Valley is committed to developing and maintaining a complete sidewalk, trail, and bicycle system that is safe, comfortable, and accessible for all users. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Golden Valley City Council hereby authorizes the Director of Physical Development or his designee to prepare and submit the 2015 Bikeway Participation Program application on behalf of the City of Golden Valley. Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST.- Kristine TTEST:Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by the City Clerk. 'J S,1� 0 IN ldcti o valley Physical Development Department 763-593-8095/763-593-8109(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting May 5, 2015 Agenda Item 3. J. Approve Assignment and Assumption Agreements with Jewish Housing and Programming (J-HAP) Prepared By Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager Summary Through the Federal Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program, the City of Golden Valley has entered into agreements with Hennepin County in support of the J-HAP project located at 9300 and 9310 Golden Valley Road. Two grants were awarded to the project, one in 2013 and one in 2014. As part of finalizing the purchase of the property, J-HAP is assigning ownership to a new entity- CHDC Cornerstone Creek LLC. The City must agree to the assignment so that the sale of the property can continue. Attachments • Assignment and Assumption Agreement for the 2013 CDBG Grant (5 pages) • Assignment and Assumption Agreement for the 2014 CDBG Grant (5 pages) • Resolution Authorizing Approval of Assignment and Assumption Agreement with Jewish Housing and Programming (1 page) Recommended Action Motion to adopt Resolution Authorizing Execution of Assignment and Assumption Agreements with Jewish Housing and Programming. ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT (Third Party Agreement) This Assignment and Assumption Agreement(this"Agreement")is made and entered into as of , 2015 (the "Effective Date") by and among Jewish Housing and Programming, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation (the "Transferor"), CHDC Cornerstone Creek LLC, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation (the "Transferee"), and the City of Golden Valley, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the "City"). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS,the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota provided the City with funds under the federal Community Development Block Grant Program, in the amount of$197,828 (the"Funds") for the Cornerstone Creek project(the"Project"); WHEREAS, the City and the Transferor entered into that certain Third Party Agreement Urban Hennepin County 2013 Community Development Block Grant Program dated October 4, 2013 (the"Third Party Agreement") governing the use of the Funds for the Project. WHEREAS, Transferor desires to transfer the Third Party Agreement to Transferee and Transferee desires to assume Transferor's obligations under the Third Party Agreement; and WHEREAS, the City desires to consent to the transfer of the Transferor's rights and obligations under the Third Party Agreement as more specifically provided herein. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows: 1. Assignment to and Assumption by the Transferee. Transferor hereby assigns to Transferee,and Transferee hereby, from and after the Effective Date,assumes and agrees to be bound by and perform each of the terms, obligations, covenants and agreements under and pursuant to the Third Party Agreement related to ownership and operation of the Property as provided therein and incorporated as part of this Agreement. 2. Consent b,�Cit_y. City hereby consents to the assignment and assumption of Transferor's rights and obligations under the Third Party Agreement by the Transferee, as provided in this Agreement. 3. Release. From and after the Effective Date, the Transferor is released of all of its obligations under the Third Party Agreement, 4. Further Assurances. The Transferor and the Transferee hereby agree to execute and deliver to one another such other agreements, documents and instruments reasonably necessary in order to effectuate the purposes of this Agreement. 5. Authority of Parties. Transferor, Transferee, and the City hereby represent and warrant that they have full power and authority to execute this Agreement and the documents related hereto, that the officers, directors, partners, members and/or governors of each such party have taken all actions necessary to authorize the execution of this Agreement,and that the individuals executing this Agreement on behalf of each such entity have been duly authorized to execute this Agreement and the documents related hereto. 6. Legal Representation. The Transferor,Transferee, and the City hereby represent,warrant and agree that each of them has fully considered the terms of this Agreement and has had the opportunity to discuss this Agreement with its respective legal counsel, and that each of them is executing the same without any coercion or duress on the part of the other party. 7. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota,without giving effect to the choice of law provisions thereof. 8. Headings. The descriptive headings for the several sections of this Agreement are inserted for convenience only and shall not define or limit any of the terms or provisions hereof. 9. Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns. 10. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which when so executed and delivered shall be deemed an original and all of which counterparts, taken together, shall constitute one and the same instrument. [Signature Pages Follow]. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have made and entered into this Agreement as of the day and year first above written. TRANSFEROR: Jewish Housing and Programming, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation By: Its: TRANSFEREE: CHDC Cornerstone Creek LLC, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation By: Its: CITY: City of Golden Valley, a Minnesota municipal corporation By: Its: By: Its: ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT (Third Party Agreement) This Assignment and Assumption Agreement No. 1 (this "Agreement") is made and entered into as of , 2015 (the "Effective Date")by and among Jewish Housing and Programming, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation(the "Transferor"), CHDC Cornerstone Creek LLC, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation (the "Transferee"), and the City of Golden Valley, a Minnesota municipal corporation(the"City"). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS,the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota provided the City with funds under the federal Community Development Block Grant Program, in the amount of$290,229(the"Funds") for the Cornerstone Creek project(the"Project"); WHEREAS, the City and the Transferor entered into that certain Third Party Agreement Urban Hennepin County 2014 Community Development Block Grant Program dated October 16, 2014 (the "Third Party Agreement")governing the use of the Funds for the Project. WHEREAS, Transferor desires to transfer the Third Party Agreement to Transferee and Transferee desires to assume Transferor's obligations under the Third Party Agreement; and WHEREAS, the City desires to consent to the transfer of the Transferor's rights and obligations under the Third Party Agreement as more specifically provided herein. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows: 1. Assignment to and Assumption by the Transferee. Transferor hereby assigns to Transferee,and Transferee hereby,from and after the Effective Date,assumes and agrees to be bound by and perform each of the terms, obligations, covenants and agreements under and pursuant to the Third Party Agreement related to ownership and operation of the Property as provided therein and incorporated as part of this Agreement. 2. Consent by City. City hereby consents to the assignment and assumption of Transferor's rights and obligations under the Third Party Agreement by the Transferee, as provided in this Agreement. 3. Release. From and after the Effective Date, the Transferor is released of' all of' its obligations under the Third Party Agreement. 4. Further Assurances. The Transferor and the Transferee hereby agree to execute and deliver to one another such other agreements, documents and instruments reasonably necessary in order to effectuate the purposes of this Agreement. 5. Authority of Parties. Transferor, Transferee, and the City hereby represent and warrant that they have full power and authority to execute this Agreement and the documents related hereto, that the officers, directors, partners, members and/or governors of each such party have taken all actions necessary to authorize the execution of this Agreement,and that the individuals executing this Agreement on behalf of each such entity have been duly authorized to execute this Agreement and the documents related hereto. 6. Legal Representation. The Transferor,Transferee,and the City hereby represent,warrant and agree that each of them has fully considered the terms of this Agreement and has had the opportunity to discuss this Agreement with its respective legal counsel, and that each of them is executing the same without any coercion or duress on the part of the other party. 7. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota,without giving effect to the choice of law provisions thereof. 8. Headings. The descriptive headings for the several sections of this Agreement are inserted for convenience only and shall not define or limit any of the terms or provisions hereof. 9. Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns. 10. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which when so executed and delivered shall be deemed an original and all of which counterparts, taken together, shall constitute one and the same instrument. [Signature Pages Follow]. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have made and entered into this Agreement as of the day and year first above written. TRANSFEROR: Jewish Housing and Programming, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation By: Its: TRANSFEREE: CHDC Cornerstone Creek LLC, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation Its: ____ -- CITY: City of Golden Valley, a Minnesota municipal corporation By: Its: By: Its: Resolution 15-38 May 5, 2015 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING APPROVAL OF ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT WITH JEWISH HOUSING AND PROGRAMMING (J-HAP) WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Golden Valley, through execution of a Joint Cooperation Agreement with Hennepin County, is cooperating in the Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant Program; and WHEREAS, the City of Golden Valley has previously approved Jewish Housing and Programming (J-HAP) for funding from the 2013 and 2014 Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant Program; and WHEREAS, J-HAP, upon finalizing the purchase of the properties at 9300 and 9310 Golden Valley Road will be assigning ownership to CHDC Cornerstone Creek LLC; and WHEREAS, the City must agree to the assignment so that the sale of the properties can continue. BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council hereby authorizes and directs the Mayor and the City Manager to execute the Assignment and Assumption Agreement and any other required Third Party Agreements on behalf of the City to assign ownership to CHDC Cornerstone Creek LLC. Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by the City Clerk. i�o dcn MEMORANDUM valley Physical Development Department 763-593-8095/763-593-8109(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting May 5, 2015 Agenda Item 3. K. Receipt of Notice of Metropolitan Council Action - General Land Use Plan, Comprehensive Plan Amendment Prepared By Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager Summary To accommodate the proposed development in southeast quadrant of the Medicine Lake Road and Winnetka Avenue North intersection (Liberty Crossing), the City Council voted to amend the Comprehensive Plan to designate the properties as "High Density Residential." Following the City's action, the Metropolitan Council reviewed the amendment and ultimately approved it. As a final step in this process, the City must now receive and file the Notice of Metropolitan Council Action. Attachments • Letter from the Metropolitan Council dated April 30, 2015 (1 page) Recommended Action Motion to receive and file the Notice of Metropolitan Council Action regarding the General Land Use Plan, Comprehensive Plan Amendment, for 7751-7775 Medicine Lake Road, 2430 and 2480 Winnetka Avenue North, and 2485 Rhode Island North. April 30, 2015 Jason Zimmerman Planning Manager City of Golden Valley 7800 Golden Valley Road Golden Valley, MN 55427 RE: City of Golden Valley,Liberty Crossing Comprehensive Plan Amendment—Post Council Action Metropolitan Council Review File No. 20585-5 Metropolitan Council District 6 Dear Mr. Zimmerman: At its meeting on April 22,2015,the Metropolitan Council reviewed the City of Golden Valley Liberty Crossing comprehensive plan amendment(CPA), based on the staff report. The CPA reguides approximately 10.86 acres from Commercial and Light Industrial to High Density Residential. The purpose of the CPA is related to a redevelopment concept that may include a 180 unit apartment building and 70 townhorne units. The Council found that the CPA conforms to the regional system plans for transportation,wastewater, and parks; is consistent with the 2030 Regional Development Framework and Council policies;and is compatible with the plans of adjacent jurisdictions. Therefore, the City may place the CPA into effect. A copy of the staff report to the Council is attached for your records. Please note the staff advisory comments related to Transit and Wastewater. The Council will append the CPA and submission form to the City's plan in the Council's files. If you have any questions, please contact Michael Larson,Principal Reviewer at 651-602-1407, Sincerely, isaBeth Barajal;,Manager Local Planning Assistane -- Allachment cc: Crystal Sheppeck, Minnesota Housing Tod Sherman, Development Reviews Coordinator, MnDOT Metro Gail Dorfman, Metropolitan Council District 6 Michael Larson, AICP, Sector Representative Raya Esmaeili, Reviews Coordinator A• ConanDevILPAIConununitieslGolden halleylLenersiGolden Dalley 2015 CPA Liberty Grossing 20585-5 Post Cound 390 Robert Street North I Saint Paul, MN 55101-1805 651.602.1000 •' ' 1 TTY. 651.291.0904 metrocouncii.org METROPOLITAN Lmpfoyer C 0 U N C I L C i ty o )1de' n FA E M 0 R ,A 1"44, �. Um valley City Administration/Council 763-593-3989/763-593-8109(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting May 5, 2015 Agenda Item 3. L. Revisions to various Boards and Commissions Bylaws Prepared By Chantell Knauss, Assistant City Manager Summary At the March 3, 2015, City Council meeting, Council approved revisions to the Guidelines for Advisory Commissions, Committees, Boards and Councils to state that the term for the Chair and Vice-Chair of any Board or Commission be up to a maximum of 2 years. Chairs and Vice-Chairs may serve more than one term, but terms cannot be served consecutively. In order for the Boards and Commissions Bylaws to be consistent with the Guidelines, bylaw revisions have been made at the Board/Commission level and are being forwarded to the Council for approval. Attachments • Environmental Commission Revised Bylaws (3 pages) • Human Rights Commission Revised Bylaws (6 pages) • Open Space & Recreation Commission Revised Bylaws (3 pages) • Planning Commission Revised Bylaws (5 pages) Recommended Action Motion to approve the Revised Bylaws for the Environmental Commission, Human Rights Commission, Open Space & Recreation Commission, and Planning Commission. BYLAWS OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY Article I: Mission Statement The Environmental Commission has been established to advise and make recommendations to the City Council in matters relating to and affecting the environment. Specifically, the Commission shall: 1. Develop and make recommendations to educate the public on environmental regulations, policies, practices and tools; 2. Develop and make recommendations as an advisory review body for amendments to or revisions of the city's Surface Water Management Plan and provide advice as requested by the Council on other city programs and initiatives; 3. Review and make recommendations regarding the city's existing environmental ordinances, policies and guidelines; 4. Develop and make recommendations on management practices for the city's nature areas, public and private ponding areas, and other such city-owned properties as directed by the City Council; 5. Participate, as directed by the City Council, in local activities initiated by other public and quasi-public agencies regarding environmental issues; 6. Advise and recommend such other functions or procedures as may be assigned to them by the City Code or the Council. Article II: Membership, Meetings, Attendance and Annual Report 1. Membership a. The Environmental Commission membership shall consist of seven (7) members who shall serve three-year staggered terms. Emphasis in appointments will be based on knowledge of environmental issues and their relationships to the natural environment and quality of life in the City. 2. Meetings a. The Commission will hold monthly meetings on the fourth Monday of the month at 7:00 p.m. b. A quorum consisting of a majority of the appointed membership is necessary to transact the business of the Commission. C. The Commission may hold special meetings to complete or initiate business at the call of the chairperson or at the request of three members. Cl. Each member shall be notified at least 48 hours notice of a special meeting regarding the time, place and purpose of the meeting. e. All meetings will be open to the public. 3. Attendance Attendance is required at all meetings. Absences in one year should not exceed three consecutive meetings or more than 25 percent of the total meetings for the year. A standardized letter of warning will be sent from the respective chair to any member after two missed meetings. If a member exceeds the allowable number of absences, the Mayor will send a standardized letter, stating that the member must step down because of the importance of regular attendance. If the Commission feels there are extenuating circumstances in a case of a member who has not met the attendance requirements, the Commission may send a letter to the Council explaining the situation and requesting an exception. If a member is unable to attend a meeting, that member should contact the staff liaison, who will inform the chair if a quorum cannot be attained and the meeting will be cancelled. 4. Annual Report On March 1 of each year, the Commission shall provide the City Council with a written annual report outlining its activities over the past year and its proposed activities for the upcoming year. Article III: Appointment, Terms and Vacancies 1, Appointments The Council shall make appointments to the Commission at its last meeting in April, effective May 1. The members shall begin their term at the Commission's first meeting in May. 2. Terms Members will serve three-year staggered terms. 3. Vacancies If a vacancy occurs before the end of the term, interim appointments may be made by the Council. GAcity council agendas\2015\05-05-15\3L-xttach-Bylaws-Environmental Comm ission-2015-03-23.doc 2 Article IV: Officers, Elections and Duties 1. Officers The Environmental Commission will have two officers: a chairperson and a vice chairperson. Terms of office shall be for a maximum of two years and shall rotate. The Chair and Vice-Chair shall not serve consecutive terms. 2. Election of Officers The Commission will elect officers at the May meeting each year. Officers will serve until the next election. 3. Duties of Officers The Commission Chairperson will: ➢ Work with staff liaison to develop meeting agendas. ➢ Conduct and preside over monthly meetings in a productive, timely manner. ➢ Monitor and ensure the progress of the Commission. ➢ Report to the City Council. ➢ Assure that the Commission conducts its activities within its mission and bylaws. The Commission Vice Chairperson will: ➢ Preside over any meeting in the Chairperson's absence. Article V: Amendments and Revisions The Commission will review these bylaws every three years, at the March meeting. Members will present recommendations for changes and amendments. These bylaws can be altered or amended at any regular monthly Commission meeting, provided that notice of the proposed changes and amendments is mailed to each member at least ten business days before the meeting. The Council must review and approve any changes to, and has final authority regarding, these bylaws. Revised by the Env. Comm. 06/27/05; Adopted by the Env. Comm. 07/24/00,- Adopted 7/24/00;Adopted by the City Council 09/05/00. Revised by the Env. Comm. 03/23/15 G:\city council agendas\2015\05-05-15\3L-xttach-Bylaws-Environmental Comm ission-2015-03-23.doc 3 CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY, MINNESOTA HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION BY-LAWS Approved by the City Council on May 5, 2015 Article I: The Commission Name of Commission. The name of the Commission shall be the "Golden Valley Human Rights Commission", which is referred to herein as the "Commission". Mission, Vision, Values and Goals Statements. Mission Help promote and nourish a safe, respectful and welcoming community. Vision The Commission adheres to the vision set forth by the City. Values The Commission adheres to the values set forth by the City. Goals • Help build community by creating opportunities for dialogue in the community through promotion and facilitation of human rights issues in collaboration with existing groups. • Seek opportunities for sponsoring and promoting educational opportunities for the community to participate (speakers, seminars, forums, etc.) and direct persons to resources on human rights. • Advise the City Council on human rights issues by serving the Council as an advisory board. Article II: Membership A. Composition. The Commission shall be an advisory commission to the City Council, composed of seven (7) regular members and two (2) youth voting members. All commissioners shall be appointed as set forth in this section. B. Regular Members. Regular members of the Commission, at least one of whom shall be an attorney, shall be appointed by the City Council for three-year staggering terms. Regular members of the Commission shall be qualified voters and residents of the City. A vacancy shall be deemed to exist if a member ceases to meet the residency requirements. C. Youth Members. Two (2) voting youth members shall be appointed by the City Council and each youth member shall serve a term of one year. D. Appointments. The terms of all Commission members shall be fixed and determined at the time of appointment. The City Council shall appoint the members of the Commission and may fill vacancies for unexpired terms. Regular members of the Commission shall serve until December 31 of the year in which their term expires or until their successors are appointed. Article III: Organization A. Officers. The officers of the Commission shall be Chair and Vice-Chair, elected from the members of the Commission. Chair. The Chair's position rotates annually and serves for one year. The Chair may not serve consecutive terms as Chair. The responsibilities of the Chair are: a. preside at all meetings of the Commission in a productive and time efficient manner; b. ensure that the Commission conducts its activities within the stated mission and by-laws of the Commission; c. appoint Commissioners to subcommittees; d. monitor and ensure the progress and completion of the Commission's work plan; and e. report to City Council. Vice-Chair. The Vice-Chair rotates annually and serves for one year. The Vice-Chair may not serve consecutive terms as Vice-Chair. The responsibilities of the Vice-Chair are: a. perform the duties of the Chair in the absence or incapacity of the Chair; and b. in the event of resignation or death of the Chair, the Vice-Chair shall perform such duties as imposed on the Chair until the original term of the Chair has expired. B. Staff Liaison. A staff liaison to the Commission shall be appointed by the City Manager. The staff liaison's responsibilities are: a. facilitate or assist in the meetings; b. keeping of the Commission's meeting agendas and minutes in accordance with the City's record keeping procedures and Minnesota Statutes; c. recording the attendance of Commission members; d. keeping the City Manager informed of the Commission's business; and e. assisting the Commission in considering their financial needs and if deemed necessary, request appropriate funding from the City Council through the annual budget process. C. Delegation of Duties. Officers may delegate duties of their position to other Commissioners as deemed appropriate by the Commission. D. Subcommittees. Subcommittees shall not consist of a majority or more of currently appointed Commission members. Article IV: Election of Officers A. Elections and Terms of Office. The Chair and Vice-Chair shall be elected from the Commission membership by its members at its regular Annual Meeting. Terms of office shall be for a maximum of two years and shall rotate. The Chair and Vice-Chair shall not serve consecutive terms. B. Vacancies. Should the office of Chair or Vice-Chair become vacant, the Commission shall elect a successor from its membership at the next regular meeting and such election shall be for the unexpired term of said office. Article IV: Meetings A. Open Meetings. All meetings of the commission shall be conducted in accordance with the Minnesota Open Meeting Law. This means all business and discussion occurs at a meeting which has been posted and is open to the public. A quorum of the members should not discuss Commission business by email, forms of social media, telephone or informal meetings. B. Annual Meeting. The Annual Meeting of the Commission shall be a regular meeting, typically the first meeting after new Commissioners are appointed, at which time elections will be held and the following year's work plan will be discussed. C. Regular Meetings. The regular meetings of the Commission shall be held on the fourth Tuesday of the month at City Hall at 6:30 p.m. The Commission may, by a majority vote, change its regular meeting dates for any reason, provided proper public notice of the changed meeting is provided. D. Special Meetings. Special meetings of the Commission may be called by the Chair or two commissioners, or by the City Council, for the purpose of transacting any business designated in the meeting notice. The notice for a special meeting shall be posted in compliance with the Minnesota State Statutes governing public meetings. The staff liaison shall notify Commissioners at least three (3) days prior to the meeting of the date, time, place and purpose of the special meeting. A special meeting must also be posted in accordance with the requirements of the Minnesota Open Meeting Law, E. Quorum and Voting. The presence of a majority of all regular members currently appointed to the Commission shall constitute a quorum for the purpose of conducting its business and exercising its powers and for all other purposes. In the event a quorum is not reached, a smaller number of members may meet to have informal discussion, however, formal action shall not be taken and must be reserved for such time as when a quorum of the Commission is reached. F. Subcommittee Meetings. Subcommittee meetings shall be held at a date and time that does not conflict with the Commission's regular and special meetings. The staff liaison shall be notified of the date, time, location and topic of all Subcommittee meetings. G. Meeting Cancellation. Commission meetings may be cancelled by the staff liaison if there are no items on the agenda for discussion. Article V: Agendas and Minutes A. Agenda Preparation. The agenda for regular and special meetings of the Commission shall be prepared by the staff liaison. Items to be placed on the agenda may be proposed by the Chair, a Commission member, the staff liaison or at the request of the City Council. Residents, businesses, or other interested parties may contact individual Commission members or the staff liaison to request that an item be placed on the agenda for consideration. All agenda topics presented by the City Council will be placed on an appropriate agenda; requests from other parties will be placed on an appropriate future agenda at the discretion of the staff liaison. B. Approval of the Agenda. The agenda shall be approved at each meeting prior to discussion of any item on the agenda. At the time of agenda approval, items may be removed and the order of business may be modified by a majority vote of members present at the meeting. No items shall be added to the agenda unless deemed as urgent by the staff liaison. Prior to adjournment, members present may communicate items recommended for inclusion on future agendas. C. Record of Proceedings. All minutes and resolutions shall be in writing and shall be kept in accordance with City procedures, Minnesota Statute and Rules regarding preservation of public records and the Minnesota Data Privacy Act. Article VI: Attendance and Performance of Duties A. Attendance. Regular attendance at meetings is a requirement for continued membership. Commission members are expected to attend regular and special commission meetings and assigned subcommittee meetings. Commission attendance shall be in accordance with the adopted Guidelines for Advisory Commissions, Committees, Boards and Councils and as amended. B. Reporting. The City Council will be informed if a Commissioner does not meet attendance guidelines. Commissioners not meeting attendance guidelines may be removed from the Commission by the City Council. C. Performance of Duties. Commissioners are expected to adequately prepare for meetings. Commissioners unable to complete an assigned task should notify the commission chair or subcommittee chair as soon as possible. The Commission may ask the City Council to review a Commissioner's appointment based upon its assessment of significant non-performance of duties. D. Orientation. Each Commissioner shall be provided an orientation in accordance with the adopted Guidelines for Advisory Commissions, Committees, Boards and Councils and as amended. Article VII: Commission Activities A. Annual Work Plan. The Commission will draft an annual work plan that details activities and projected timelines for the upcoming year. • The Chair may appoint Commissioners to be primarily responsible for each work plan activity. • The Commission may establish subcommittees to oversee work plan activities. The subcommittees will be chaired by Commissioners appointed by the Chair. • The Commission's work plan will be submitted to the City Council, typically during the first quarter of the calendar year. The Chair and/or assigned Commissioners will attend a Council/Manager meeting to discuss the annual work plan with the City Council. • The Commission's work plan must be agreed upon by the City Council. B. Subcommittees. The Commission may create subcommittees to plan and direct activities related to topics of interest to the Commission and to oversee work plan activities. • Subcommittees will be chaired by Commissioners appointed by the Chair. • Subcommittees shall not consist of a majority or more of currently appointed Commission members. A majority of the subcommittee must be present to conduct business, including the subcommittee chair. • The Commission may consolidate or dissolve subcommittees at any time. • The subcommittee chair may appoint other Commissioners and representatives from the broader community to the subcommittee, provided that the subcommittee at no time consists of a majority or more of currently appointed Commission members. • The subcommittee chair shall report back to the Commission about its activities as an agenda item at regular Commission meetings. C. Annual Report to City Council. The Commission shall submit an annual report to the City Council summarizing the past year's activities. The report may highlight information the Commission feels appropriate to convey to the City Council. • The Chair or Vice-Chair will prepare the report for approval by the Commission. Commission members may submit signed addenda presenting alternative conclusions or perspectives. • The report and addenda are submitted with the current year work plan in the first quarter of the calendar year or as soon thereafter as possible. • After being approved by the Commission, the annual report and any addenda shall be provided to the staff liaison for inclusion on a Council agenda. Article VIII: By-Laws and Rules A. Amendments. Proposed amendments to these By-Laws may be forwarded to the City Council for approval by a majority of all voting members of the Commission. Commission members must be given one month's advance notice regarding proposed amendments prior to formal Commission action. Amendments to these procedures can only be considered at a regular meeting of the Commission. B. City Council Approval. These by-laws are subject to the City Council's approval and must comply with the Golden Valley City Code. BY-LAWS OF THE OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION COMMISSION CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY Article I: Mission Statement The mission of the Open Space and Recreation Commission shall be to advise and recommend to the Council as to recreational programs, parks, and open space in the community. Specifically, the Commission shall: A. Develop and make recommendations to maintain and update the portion of the Comprehensive Plan relating to open space needs, parks and recreation programs, and trail systems; B. Develop and periodically review policies and plans for parks, recreation programs, use of open space, and trail systems; C. Periodically update an assessment of current programs regarding open space, parks and recreation, and trail systems; D. Periodically update an assessment of future needs regarding parks and recreation, open space, and trail systems; E. Advise the Council on cooperative agreements, policies with other public and private agencies, groups or individuals relative to recreational programs and facilities; and, F. Advise Council on budget and capital outlay needs for parks and recreation, Brookview Golf Course, and park improvement fund. Article II: Membership, Meetings and Attendance A. Membership 1. The Open Space and Recreation Commission membership shall consist of nine (9) members who shall serve three-year staggered terms. Emphasis in appointments will be based on knowledge of open space and recreation issues and their relationships to the quality of life in the City. B. Meetings 1. The Commission will hold monthly meetings on the fourth Monday of the month at 7:00 p.m. 2. A quorum consisting of a simple majority of the membership is necessary to transact the business of the Commission. 3. The Commission may hold special meetings to complete or initiate business at the call of the chairperson or at the request of three members. 4. Each member shall be given at least 48 hours notice of a special meeting regarding the time, place, and purpose of the meeting. 5. All meetings will be open to the public. C. Attendance 1. Attendance is expected at all meetings. Absences in one year should not exceed three consecutive meetings or more than 25% of the total meetings for the year. Absence from 25% per year or more of regular or special meetings shall be cause for recommendation for removal from the Commission. Members are responsible for notifying the staff liaison or chairperson if they cannot attend a meeting. If a quorum cannot be attained, the meeting will be cancelled. Article III: Appointment, Terms and Vacancies A. Appointments The Council shall appoint members to the Commission effective May 1St of each year. Terms shall begin at the first meeting in May of each year. B. Terms Members will serve three-year staggered terms. C. Vacancies If a vacancy occurs before the end of the term, interim appointments may be made by the Council. Article IV: Officers, Elections, and Duties A. Officers The Open Space and Recreation Commission will have two officers: Chair and Vice-Chair. B. Election of Officers The Commission shall elect officers at its first meeting after May 1St of each year. Terms of office shall be for a maximum of two years and shall rotate. The Chair and Vice-Chair shall not serve consecutive terms. C. Duties of Officers 1. The Commission Chairperson will: • Work with staff liaison to develop meeting agendas. • Conduct and preside over monthly meetings in a productive, timely manner. • Monitor and ensure the progress of the Commission. • Report to the City Council. 2 • Assure that the Commission conducts its activities within its mission and by-laws. 2. The Commission Vice Chairperson will: • Preside over any meeting in the Chairperson's absence. Article V: Amendments and Revisions The Commission will review these by-laws annually at a meeting with a majority of members present, and members will present recommendations for changes and amendments. These by-laws can be altered or amended at any regular Commission meeting, provided that notice of the proposed changes and amendments is mailed to each member at least ten business days before the meeting. The Council shall approve any changes to these by-laws. Adopted by the OSRC—March 23,2015 3 BY-LAWS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY ANNUAL MEETING Section 1. The annual meeting of the City Planning Commission shall be the first regular meeting in May of each year. REGULAR MEETING Section 2. Regular meetings of the Commission shall be held at 7 pm on the second and fourth Monday of each month. A majority of the membership of the Commission shall constitute a quorum. A City staff representative to the Planning Commission shall serve as Recording Secretary. SPECIAL MEETING Section 3. Special meetings may be called by the Chair whenever he/she deems the same expedient or whenever three members request the same in writing. Section 4. The members may adjourn from time to time, absentees being notified. If no quorum is present on the day fixed for a regular, continued or special meeting, the members present may adjourn until a quorum is obtained, or may adjourn said meeting without a definite day fixed. Section 5. Chair or staff shall give personal notice to each commissioner, at least forty- eight hours previous to any special meeting, of the time, place, and purpose of the meeting. Section 6. No business shall be transacted at any special meeting other than that named in the call thereof, except by consent of two-thirds of the entire Commission, or by unanimous consent if fewer than two-thirds, but at least a quorum are present. If such consent is obtained, any measure adopted by a vote of a quorum shall have the same effect as if adopted at a regular meeting. ATTENDANCE Section 7. Staff will maintain a record of those Commission members present and those absent for each Planning Commission meeting. Each Planning Commission member is responsible to notify the Planning Staff in the event that he or she will not be able to attend a regularly scheduled meeting. Attendance is required at all meetings. Absence from three (3) consecutive meetings or 25 percent of the regularly scheduled meetings in any one year shall constitute grounds for automatic review of a member's appointment by the Council. It shall be the Chairperson's responsibility to contact the Commission member involved and report circumstances for the absences to the City Council. CONDUCT OF BUSINESS Section 8. Meetings shall be called to order by the Chair, or in his/her absence, by the Vice Chair. In the absence of both, the Secretary shall call the meeting to order. In the absence of all officers, the senior member present will call the meeting to order. Section 9. The minutes of previous meetings shall be submitted for approval and any errors noted and corrections made, after which, the regular order of business shall be taken up. The further order of business, unless otherwise ordered by the Commission, shall be as follows, and may be shown on the agenda of each regular meeting: 1. Action Items 2. Planning Items 3. Administrative Items 4. Other Business 5. Adjournment Section 10. All motions and resolutions offered and/or adopted by the Commission shall be recorded in writing. If it is desired that more than the substance thereof be entered in the minutes, the Chair shall so direct the Recording Secretary, who will incorporate the additional details with the minutes of the meeting. At the request of any Commissioner, the vote of each commissioner shall be taken and entered on the record on any question before the Commission. ELECTION OF OFFICERS Section 11. At the annual meeting in May of each year, the Commission shall elect a Chair, Vice Chair, Secretary, and such other offices as it may deem necessary; but in case of failure to elect at the time specified, the election shall take place at a subsequent meeting without delay. The Chair, Vice-Chair, and Secretary shall hold their respective officers until the next annual meeting after their election, and until their successors are elected and qualified. Commissioners shall not serve as chair or vice chair for more than two consecutive, one year terms. DUTIES OF THE CHAIR Section 12. The Chair or designee shall preside at all meetings of the Commission and may present to the Commission such matters as in his/her judgment require attention. When the Commission has not established rules of parliamentary practice, the Chair shall be guided by Roberts' Rules of Order Revised. The Chair shall review the Commissioners' attendance records every six months in both February and August. The Chair shall exercise a general supervision over the business, papers, and property of the Commission and shall act as the Commission's Executive Officer. The Chair or his/her designated representative shall present to the Council all Planning Commission recommendations. The Chair shall perform all other duties as the Commission may prescribe. The Chair may appoint ad hoc committees unless the Commission shall otherwise direct, and shall be an additional member ex officio of all committees. The Chair shall appoint a Planning Commission member to chair each ad hoc committee. The Chair is a voting member of the Commission. DUTIES OF THE VICE CHAIR Section 13. The Vice Chair shall act for the Chair when the Chair is absent or disabled. All duties of the Chair's office or as a member of any committee shall temporarily devolve upon the Vice Chair. Vice Chair shall perform all other duties the Commission may prescribe. DUTIES OF THE COMMISSION SECRETARY AND RECORDING SECRETARY Section 14. The Commission Secretary shall sign the minutes and perform all other duties the Commission may prescribe. In the absence of the Chair and Vice Chair, the Commission Secretary shall call the meeting to order. A member of the Planning staff shall attend all meetings and act as Recording Secretary to the Commission, and shall, in addition, perform all other duties usually pertaining to this office. He/She shall keep a true and complete record of all proceedings of the Commission, and have charge of the all books, documents and papers which properly belong to this office. REPRESENTATIVE TO THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS (BZA) Section 15. Any member of the Planning Commission may serve as the representative to the Board of Zoning Appeals. A Planning Commissioner, appointed each year at the annual meeting of the Planning commission shall be the fifth member of the board of Zoning Appeals. All of the members of the Planning Commission are alternates to the Board. In the absence of any member of the Board, any member of the Planning Commission may serve as an alternate. At least one member of the Planning Commission shall be present at each meeting of the Board of Zoning Appeals. AD HOC COMMITTEES Section 16. The Chair may appoint ad hoc committees unless the Commission shall otherwise direct, and shall be an additional member ex officio, of all committees. The Chair shall appoint a Planning Commission member to chair each ad hoc committee. All committees shall consist of at least three members, except as otherwise ordered by the Commission. Three members of any committee shall constitute a quorum of such committee. If a quorum is not present at a meeting, the members present may prepare reports and submit them to the Planning Commission on behalf of the committee, in which case the report shall name the committee members who prepared it. Nothing in the foregoing shall be construed as waiving the rights of the Commission at any time to increase or curtail the duties of any committee and/or to direct or control its actions. AMENDMENTS Section 17. The above rules and regulations, or any portion thereof, may be suspended by a majority of the members of the Commission at any regular meeting, or may be amended or repealed by a two-thirds vote of the entire Commission at any regular meeting subsequent to the meeting when the same is proposed. MOTION WITH DUTIES OF PLANNING COMMISSION The ordinance establishing the Planning Commission has several charges and general duties giving direction to the Commission. The City Council, by motion, approves the following list of duties which amplifies and/or gives more specific direction to the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission shall: A. Review and make recommendations on specific development proposals made by private developers and public agencies. B. Review and make recommendations on proposed rezonings, subdivision plans, amendments to the zoning text, platting regulations and variances and similar items having to do with administration and regulatory measures. C. Conduct special studies dealing with items such as renewal, civic design, maintenance of a suitable living and working environment, economic conditions, etc. These studies may be conducted at the initiative of the Planning Commission and/or specific direction from the City Council. D. Review major public capital improvement plans against the policy and goals stated in the Comprehensive Plan for the area. E. Advise and make recommendations relative to housing, new development, and redevelopment projects proposed by the HRA prior to the final commitment of such projects by the HRA. This charge shall also relate to such responsibilities as: 1. Make recommendations to the City Council and/or HRA on the use of Federal and State Funds received for housing and community development. 2. Make recommendations to the City Council on the City's participation in other Federal, State, Metropolitan Council, County and Multi-City Housing and Community Development programs. F. Advise and make recommendations in matters relating to and affecting the environment such as: 1. Taking into account environmental concerns and the impact on the environment of any Planning Commission recommended action. 2. To cooperate with and coordinate environmental proposals and programs with other City groups and Federal, State, Metro, County and other municipal groups. 3. To make such reviews of land reclamation, filling, excavation and grading applications as are required by City ordinance or referred to the Commission by the Council; provided that no review or recommendation shall remove or limit the right of a property owner in accordance with City ordinances and the statutes and constitution of the State of Minnesota. Amended —April 2015 ' ty 0 I �� 1�� u� �m�/ �� '�� "��, �� ^ �� / �� go valley CityAdministration/��U�il 763-593-8003/763+593-8109(fam) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting May 5' 2015 Agenda Item 3. K1. Board/Commission Reappointments Prepared By ShepHarris, Mayor Summary Each year staff contacts board and/or commission members whose term is expiring to find out if they are interested in being reappointed, Listed below are those who would like to be reappointed. Recommended Action Motion to make the following reappointments: Board ofZoning Appeals DovidPerich 1yeorternn term expires- May 1, 2O16 George Maxwell Iyearterrn term expires- May 1, ZO16 Nancy Nelson 1yearternn term expires' May I, 20lG Richard Orenstein 1yeartermn term expires - May l, 3O1O Civil Service Commission Ben Peterson 3 year term term expires ' May 1, 2018 Environmental Commission Dawn Hill 3 year term term expires ' May I, 2018 Larry Johnson 3year term term expires ' May I, 3OI8 Human Services Fund Kathryn Frommer 3year term term expires - May l, 2O18 Planning Commission Ronald Blum 3year term term expires - May I, 2Ol8 Andy]ohnson 3year term term expires - May 1, 3Ol8 Open Space and Recreation Commission Bob Mattison 3 year term term expires - May 1, 2018 Daniel Steinberg 3 year term term expires - May 1, 2018 City Oj golden -vv* a e Physical Development Department 763'593'8095/763-593'810#(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting May 5, 2015 60 day deadline: May 11, 2015 Agenda Item 4. A. Public Hearing' Preliminary PUD Plan for Liberty Crossing PUD No. 123 ' 7751'7775 Medicine Lake Road, I430 and 3480 VVinnetka Avenue North, 3485 Rhode Island Avenue North ' Intuitive Investments, Applicant Prepared By Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager Summary Intuitive Investments is seeking approval of Planned Unit Development (PUD) to create a residential development consisting of 184 unit apartment building and 63 tovvnhonnes in the southeast quadrant of the Medicine Lake Road and VVinnetka Avenue North intersection. As part of the development, the properties would need to be rezoned to High Density Residential. The proposal involves four lots, all containing existing structures-the VFW building at 775I-7775 Medicine Lake Road (3.0 acres), a car wash at 2485 Rhode Island Avenue North (0.88 acres), an Asian restaurant at 2480VVinnetka Avenue North (I.O acres), and the vacant 3|FCO building at 2430VVinnetka Avenue North (5.4 acres). In total, the land area of all four properties is 10.88 acres. In the northwest corner of the block, the Walgreens, Dairy Queen, and Midland Auto buildings would all remain. To the south, the public storage buildings would also remain. The proposed PUD would allow for the consolidation of the properties and the construction of an apartment building and 15 tovvnhorn8 buildings. The apartment building would be located in the southeastern portion of the site and vvnu|d be complemented by an outdoor pool, a dog run, a play area, and a community amenity building containing fitness equipment. The apartment building would be five stories above ground and one level below grade for parking. Four1ovvnhnnoe buildings, each two stories and containing six units, would be located on the northernmost portion of the site, closest to Medicine Lake Road. Six additional two story tovvnhonne buildings, four containing four units and two containing six units, would be located on the westernmost portion of the Site along VVinnetka Avenue. To the south, five one story tovvnhonne buildings would Containing 11 units. On April 13, 2015, the Planning Commission recommended approval (6-0) of the Preliminary PUD Plan and the rezoning. Stormwater Management A critical aspect of this project, as outlined in more detail in the memo from the Engineering Division, is the management of stormwater on these properties, which would be handled both through an above ground pre-treatment and filtration basin but also through a network of modular underground storage chambers. This system would not only manage water originating on-site, but, through a partnership with the City, may help capture additional amounts of water that currently cause flooding issues along Medicine Lake Road and in the Decola Ponds area. Water moving southeast from Medicine Lake Road would be diverted through the construction of an open swale into Decola Pond B. When water levels reach a critical depth, the overflow would be diverted into the underground storage chambers on the subject property and would be released gradually over a period of time as water in the Decola Pond system lowers. The construction of the swale would necessitate the removal of a portion of Rhode Island Avenue south of the entrance to Dover Hills and north of the entrance to the site and the new apartment building. The creation of this new green space would not only enhance the apartment building, but would remove existing impervious surfaces and provides a direct link from the site to Pennsylvania Woods and the existing trails. The final engineering and financing for the stormwater structures is still being developed. Attachments • Location Map (1 page) • Applicant's Narrative (2 pages) • Memo to the Planning Commission dated April 13, 2015 (8 pages) • Planning Commission minutes dated April 13, 2015 (11 pages) • Memo from the Fire Department dated April 8, 2015 (4 pages) • Memo from the Engineering Division dated April 9, 2015 (7 pages) • Neighborhood Meeting presentation from March 31, 2015 (9 pages) • Plans from Tanek Architecture submitted March 12, 2015 (7 pages) • Site Survey submitted March 30, 2015 (1 page) • Preliminary Plat submitted April 8, 2015 (1 page) Recommended Action Motion to approve the Preliminary Plan for Liberty Crossing PUD No. 123 subject to the following conditions: 1. The plans prepared by Tanek, submitted March 12, 2015, shall become a part of this approval. 2. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Fire Department, dated April 8, 2015, shall become a part of this approval. 3. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Engineering Division, dated April 9, 2015, shall become a part of this approval. 4. Public bicycle racks or similar facilities for the parking/storage of a minimum of 14 bicycles shall be provided, based on a calculation of 5% of the 276 parking spaces required for the apartment building. 5. All signage must meet the requirements of the City's Sign Code (Section 4.20). 6. The Final Plat shall include "P,U.D. No. 123" in its title. 7. A park dedication fee of$60,100, or 2% of the land value, shall be paid before release of the Final Plat. 8. A traffic, pedestrian, and safety study shall be done as a part of the Final PUD proposal. 9. This approval is subject to all other state, federal, and local ordinances, regulations, or laws with authority over this development. In addition the Council makes the following findings pursuant to City Code Section 11.55, Subd. 5(E): 1. Quality Site Planning, The PUD plan is tailored to the specific characteristics of the site and achieves a higher quality of site planning and design than generally expected under conventional provisions of the ordinance. The applicant worked closely with the City during a lengthy pre-application process—and has continued to refine the proposal—in order to accommodate the unique circumstances surrounding the site. The flexibility allowed under a PUD is necessary to achieve the outcome that will not only benefit the applicant, but the City as a whole. Staff believes this standard has been met. 2. Preservation. The PUD plan preserves and protects substantial desirable portions of the site's characteristics, open space and sensitive environmental features including steep slopes, trees, scenic views, creeks, wetlands, and open waters. Given the lack of open space or other sensitive environmental features on the site today, there is little available for the applicant to preserve. However, the proposal does take advantage of the natural areas of Pennsylvania Woods and Decola Pond B to the east and, in partnership with the City, will use a constructed swale to manage stormwater more effectively and result in the creation of additional green space within in the Rhode Island Avenue right of way. Staff believes this standard has been met. 3. Efficient– Effective. The PUD plan includes efficient and effective use (which includes preservation) of the land. The proposal not only provides for an increase in residential density in an underutilized area well served by transit, but the creative inclusion of regional flood storage within the development provides a benefit to the greater area. Staff believes this standard has been met. 4. Compatibility. The PUD Plan results in development compatible with adjacent uses and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and redevelopment plans and goals. The use of this property for higher density residential use is compatible with the neighboring property to the east and the density being proposed is consistent with the City's revised Comprehensive Plan. Staff believes this standard has been met. 5. General Health. The PUD plan is consistent with preserving and improving the general health, safety and general welfare of the people of the City. The potential for reduction in flooding along Medicine Lake Road and within the Decola Ponds area provides great benefit to the City and its residents. Staff believes this standard has been met. 6. Meets Requirements. The PUD plan meets the PUD Intent and Purpose provision and all other PUD ordinance provisions. The flexibility provided by the PUD allows for a better site layout and coordination between the two uses on the site. Staff believes this standard has been met. W PJB UJ w QUEBEC 1 TT_ upppgpu�p��o��MedICIn P Cake Rd mm--ft.. pp�ppn�p�ppupppp�o��pp�n�upnpnpppuprrpppp�rr�p�u�rrpupn�u�u�ppiu 550 8179 8139 8101 F2550 782 5 81181 _� 2575 s 77757`51 22 2 2526 2500 8140 8100 8025 25422225:2524'' 222246 1 25JU 255 J;25,2 8 11124!`2 246 1 .7 5 2 508110 -_ - Subject Properties: 70 X560 252506 7 d4 ,554 2512 2486 2476 745 15th Ave N 2552 250- �8159 8101 x5612562 2504 24: 2480 2485 2500 2568 2500 241242802'4 — 2445 2400 24;24182 24244 2400 2405 2440 2445 s 2450 2 405 > Z 2420 2422 �J y 2440 1485 ; 16 101,,2400 2380 2385 Q 8040 8020 2425 4 21 /1011101 15 a $ > 2400 319 705 a 2360 2365 m 2415 H 519 719 718 t toJonellen Ln O a 235 2340 2345 80458015 8005 7979 2409 { t 335 7 .11 I 23zo 810o W8040 8020 8000 _2430 _ 4r,7 315 7980 2337 Z • = ta Wynnwood Rd > Y: 8155 t 7— — 18135 18105 8045 8015 2315 y 2320 2325 � d _ .y 2300 w - 8100 ' d 2300 y&. 2008180 5140 8040 8020 80001 ]2 J • * 7 1 ' , \= Pennsylvania W 2301 23rd Ave N 25 22551 ! 2250 2255 2r22200 5 7955 7925 • 7901 785378337831 .^ d 7851 � { � �•:�:'a11k,:... _ ;�,�:�.s �'i 2220 2225 2225 -- 2209 2202 2200 7960 > ?k.==�=_: �f�, sr=-.: r Ek�.`ee •``: 7200 2205 79407920_ 2205 1 > I S + 22)05 2200 ilei :ylri— _,:alfecec 'r:xiri �K:.': March 12, 2015 Liberty Crossing — Intuitive Investments PUD Narrative Outline on PUD Zoning Code a) The Liberty Crossing PUD development encourages, preserves and improves the health, safety and general welfare of the people of the City by encouraging the use of contemporary land planning principles. Liberty Crossing is working with the Golden Valley Engineering Department to mitigate storm water flooding in this area of Golden Valley. This effort will improve the health, safety and general welfare of the residents of Golden Valley. In addition the redevelopment will improve the current level of water quality and storm water management on this 10 acre site. b) The Liberty Crossing PUD development achieves a high quality of site planning, design, landscaping and building materials which are compatible with the existing and planned land use. The Liberty Crossing site and land use plan will deliver high quality, best practices site planning and design, landscaping and building materials to the development. c) The Liberty Crossing PUD development encourages preservation and protection of desirable site characteristics and open space and protection of sensitive environmental features including steep slopes, trees, scenic views, water ways, wetlands and lakes. The development will provide new storm water management improvements that will enhance and protect the Decola Pond system in Golden Valley as well as the surrounding properties and infrastructure. d) The Liberty Crossing PUD development encourages construction of affordable housing and a variety of housing types. Liberty Crossing will provide a wide variety of including affordable rental properties to Golden Valley. The combination of rental apartments, one story and two story townhomes will also provide housing for a large demographic of the population. e) The Liberty Crossing PUD development encourages creativity and flexibility in land development. The development includes a variety of land development techniques and uses on this site. This development includes low density and high density residential properties as well as creating open space and increasing the existing green space on the site. f) The Liberty Crossing PUD development encourages efficient and effective use of land, open space, streets, utilities and other public features. The redevelopment will remove older obsolete buildings on the property which include the existing land, open space, streets and tultites. The new buildings will include the most current practices in design and construction to provide efficiency and sustainability in design and construction. g) The Liberty Crossing PUD development allows mixing land uses and assembly and development of land to form larger parcels. Currently the development consists of four separate land parcels. The PUD will allow the developer to combine the parcels into a larger parcel and provide both low density and high density residential uses. h) The Liberty Crossing PUD development encourages development in transitional areas which achieve compatibility with all adjacent and nearby land uses. The Liberty Crossing surrounding area and properties is largely mixed use including single family, multi family, industrial, retail and institutional uses. The proposed low density and high density uses at Liberty Crossing will prove very compatible to the surrounding uses. i) The Liberty Crossing PUD development achieves development consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The City of Golden Valley has already reviewed and approved a revision to their Comprehensive Plan for the Liberty Crossing use. The Met Council is considering a similar approval in the very near future. j) The Liberty Crossing PUD development achieves development consistent with the City's redevelopment plans and goals. The development will provide a significant upgrade to the northwest corner of Golden Valley by removing four old structures which are currently underutilized properties. The new development will provide 247 units of housing for approximately 370 to 425 residents that will positively impact the City of Golden Valley including the surrounding neighborhoods and businesses. k) The Liberty Crossing PUD development encourages development that is sustainable and has a high degree of energy efficiency. The new residential buildings constructed at Liberty Crossing will be state of the art in both green design and include efficient materials during construction and in ongoing property operations. city 0 golden4;� MEMORANDUM v %.,Y Physical Development Department 763-593-8095 1763-593-8109(fax) Date: April 13, 2015 To: Golden Valley Planning Commission From: Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager Subject: Informal Public Hearing– Rezoning and Preliminary PUD Plan for Liberty Crossing PUD No. 123 – 7751-7775 Medicine Lake Road, 2430 and 2480 Winnetka Avenue North, 2485 Rhode Island Avenue North – Intuitive Investments, Applicant Background Intuitive Investments is seeking approval of a Planned Unit Development (PUD) to create a residential development consisting of a 184 unit apartment building and 63 townhomes in the southeast quadrant of the Medicine Lake Road and Winnetka Avenue North intersection. As part of the development, the properties would need to be rezoned to High Density Residential. The proposal involves four lots, all containing existing structures—the VFW building at 7751-7775 Medicine Lake Road (3.0 acres), a car wash at 2485 Rhode Island Avenue North (0.88 acres), an Asian restaurant at 2480 Winnetka Avenue North (1.6 acres), and the vacant SIFCO building at 2430 Winnetka Avenue North (5.4 acres). In total, the land area of all four properties is 10.88 acres. In the northwest corner of the block, the Walgreens, Dairy Queen, and Midland Auto buildings would all remain. To the south, the public storage buildings would also remain. Surrounding the site are single family homes to the west (across Winnetka), the public storage site to the south, commercial and multi-family residential uses to the north (across Medicine Lake Road in New Hope), and multi-family residential and open space to the east (across Rhode Island) in the form of the Dover Hills Apartments, Pennsylvania Woods, and Decola Pond B. Currently, the site can be accessed via two driveways on Winnetka, two driveways on Rhode Island, and two driveways on Medicine Lake Road. In addition, a narrow right-of-way extends from the VFW site to Winnetka to the west. Three of the properties (the VFW, the car wash, and the Asian restaurant) are zoned Commercial. The SIFCO property is zoned Light Industrial. On December 2, 2014, the City Council approved re- designating these properties as High Density Residential on the General Land Use Plan Map. This request has been sent to the Metropolitan Council for review and approval. 0) 7751-75 o h� �y °D O7 8025 n ry ^ E 2542 AO $100 N p 2486 2476 2564 2520 2458 C.ig 8�0� Ztr60 2A65 2� � OD 2500 2414 2436 CD 0 Zp05 2AA0 ZAA5 2°^'`0 C) * ZAP 0 0o J o o �n OD OD 2400 2 ko o v t N N In m @ N a.w j O los T CD CD (PO 4�p QIP N[ 2337 00 2'j2P X25 n CD 7955 7925 2240 2�0 25 20 M tri M M _ so COm m T 2220 Proposed PUD 123 - Site Map Summary of Proposal The proposed PUD would allow for the consolidation of the properties and the construction of a 184 unit apartment building and 15 townhome buildings containing 63 units. The apartment building would be located in the southeastern portion of the site and would be complemented by an outdoor pool, a dog run, a play area, and a community amenity building containing fitness equipment. The apartment building would be five stories above ground and one level below grade for parking. Four townhome buildings, each two stories and containing six units, would be located on the northernmost portion of the site, closest to Medicine Lake Road. Six additional two story townhome buildings, four containing four units and two containing six units, would be located on the westernmost portion of the site along Winnetka Avenue. To the south, five one story townhome buildings would containing 11 units. Access to the site would primarily be from Winnetka Avenue, with two drives serving the majority of the townhomes and the apartment building. Additional access to the apartment building, including to the underground parking entrance, would be off of Rhode Island Avenue in the southeast corner of the site. Under this proposal, direct access to Medicine Lake Road would be removed and the northernmost townhomes would be accessed through the site via Winnetka. F l m y--' a.• i+RR rrr rrr rrr rrr rrr •r■�T Proposed Site Layout The underground parking level of the apartment building would provide 232 stalls. A surface parking area in front of the building would provide another 56 spaces for a total of 288 spaces. Based on the parking requirements of the Zoning Code, 276 spaces are required. All but five of the townhome units would have garage space for two cars; five of the townhome units would have garage space for one car. In addition, 17 driveway spaces would be provided for the 11 one story townhomes for a total of 138 parking spaces. Based on the parking requirements of the Zoning Code, 126 spaces are required. 39 additional parking spaces would be available along the internal street network. Existing sidewalks along Winnetka and Medicine Lake Road would be preserved, and a new internal sidewalk network would be added to move pedestrians through the site. As outlined in the Engineering Division memo, staff recommends the applicant explore additional pedestrian connections to Walgreens and to the existing trails in Pennsylvania Woods to the east. Per the Zoning Code, bicycle racks or a similar facility must be available to the public at a rate of 5% of the required vehicle parking. Based on the 184 apartment units and 276 vehicle spaces required, 14 public bicycle spaces must be provided. Land Use and Zoning Considerations As a PUD, the City can offer flexibility from the regular zoning requirements in order to achieve a better development. The following table summarizes how closely the requirements of the R-4 High Density Residential Zoning District are met under the current proposal: R-4 High Density Residential Liberty Crossing Use Multiple-family dwellings Apartment and townhomes Dimensional Standards Minimum lot area 20,000 square feet for any Total site area over 473,000 principal structure square feet; largest lot at 160,229—smallest at 1,608 Minimum lot width at front 150' Greater than 290' setback line Structure coverage 45% maximum 25.4% Impervious coverage 60% maximum 63.1% Front setback 25' 25' along Winnetka, 28' along Rhode Island, 40' along Medicine Lake Road Side setback 20' 47' along Walgreens property Rear setback 20' 22' along south property line Accessory structures Includes private indoor and Pool, play area, and outdoor recreation facilities clubhouse/fitness building The site will be divided into 65 individual lots, including 63 townhome lots and a large lot containing the apartment building. All remaining property, primarily consisting of circulation and parking areas, will be combined into one lot. Although the amount of impervious coverage is slightly higher than what would be allowed under the typical R-4 zoning designation, the amount of impervious coverage is actually a reduction from the existing conditions. In addition, the innovative storm water management system being proposed in partnership with the City (see below) will result in the removal of a portion of Rhode Island Avenue to the east, increasing the amount of pervious surfaces in the area even further. PUD Standards and Guidelines There are a handful of standards and guidelines set within Section 11.55 of the City Code that regulate PUDs. The following table summarizes how closely the requirements of this section are met under the current proposal: Planned Unit Developments Liberty Crossing Lot size No minimum NA Frontage 100' or adequate to serve the Greater than 290' development Principal building setbacks No closer than its height to NA the rear or side property line of a single-family district All building setbacks No closer than 15'from the Meets requirements back of curb along internal roadway systems Private service facilities or Operation and maintenance Will be included with Final common areas agreements required PUD approval Neighborhood Meeting A neighborhood meeting was held on March 31, 2015, and roughly 14 people attended. The developer presented the project and answered questions related to site layout, stormwater, access, and the development timeline. Stormwater Management As outlined in more detail in the memo from the Engineering Division, management of stormwater for this project would be handled both through an above ground pre-treatment and filtration basin but also through a network of modular underground storage chambers. This system would not only manage water originating on-site, but,through a partnership with the City, would help capture large amounts of water that currently cause flooding issues along Medicine Lake Road and in the Decola Ponds area. Water moving southeast from Medicine Lake Road would be diverted through the construction of an open swale into Decola Pond B. When water levels reach a critical depth, the overflow would be diverted into the underground storage chambers on the subject property and would be released gradually over a period of time as water in the Decola Pond system lowers. The construction of the Swale would necessitate the removal of a portion of Rhode Island Avenue south of the entrance to Dover Hills and north of the entrance to the site and the new apartment building. The creation of this new green space not only enhances the apartment building, but removes existing impervious surfaces and provides a direct link from the site to Pennsylvania Woods and the existing trails. Engineering and Fire Safety Considerations As is standard practice for development proposals, plans for this proposal were reviewed by the City's Engineering Division to ensure the site can be adequately served by public utilities. A memorandum from the Engineering Division that addresses flood mitigation, access and circulation, pedestrian facilities, sanitary sewer and water services, inflow and infiltration, stormwater management, and tree preservation is attached. The Fire Department reviewed this proposal to ensure that adequate emergency vehicle access is achieved on the site. A memorandum from the Fire Department that addresses site access, site design, and water supply is attached. Anticipated Development Timeline The applicant has completed the purchase of the SIFCO site and anticipates completing the purchases of the other properties in early summer of 2015. Upon final approval of the PUD in the fall, demolition of the existing buildings could proceed, beginning with the SIFCO property. It is anticipated that site work and construction of the underground parking level of the apartment building could take place in the late fall, with additional work on the apartment building continuing throughout the winter. Working with the City, the underground storage could be installed early in 2016 with construction of the townhomes taking place soon afterwards. Leasing for the apartment and townhomes could happen as early as late 2016. Justification for Consideration as a PUD The PUD process is an optional method of regulating land use in order to permit flexibility in uses allowed, setbacks, height, parking requirements, and number of buildings on a lot. Applications for PUDs must be consistent with the Intent and Purpose provisions and the PUD requirements and principles and standards adhered to in the City. In order to be approved as a PUD, the City must be able to make the following findings: 1. Quality Site Planning. The PUD plan is tailored to the specific characteristics of the site and achieves a higher quality of site planning and design than generally expected under conventional provisions of the ordinance. The applicant worked closely with the City during a lengthy pre-application process—and has continued to refine the proposal—in order to accommodate the unique circumstances surrounding the site. The flexibility allowed under a PUD is necessary to achieve the outcome that will not only benefit the applicant, but the City as a whole. Staff believes this standard has been met. 2. Preservation. The PUD plan preserves and protects substantial desirable portions of the site's characteristics, open space and sensitive environmental features including steep slopes, trees, scenic views, creeks, wetlands, and open waters. Given the lack of open space or other sensitive environmental features on the site today,there is little available for the applicant to preserve. However,the proposal does take advantage of the natural areas of Pennsylvania Woods and Decola Pond B to the east and, in partnership with the City, will use a constructed swale to manage stormwater more effectively and result in the creation of additional green space within in the Rhode Island Avenue right of way. Staff believes this standard has been met. 3. Efficient—Effective. The PUD plan includes efficient and effective use (which includes preservation) of the land. The proposal not only provides for an increase in residential density in an underutilized area well served by transit, but the creative inclusion of regional flood storage within the development provides a benefit to the greater area. Staff believes this standard has been met. 4. Compatibility. The PUD Plan results in development compatible with adjacent uses and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and redevelopment plans and goals. The use of this property for higher density residential use is compatible with the neighboring property to the east and the density being proposed is consistent with the City's revised Comprehensive Plan. Staff believes this standard has been met. 5. General Health. The PUD plan is consistent with preserving and improving the general health, safety and general welfare of the people of the City. The potential for reduction in flooding along Medicine Lake Road and within the Decola Ponds area provides great benefit to the City and its residents. Staff believes this standard has been met. 6. Meets Requirements. The PUD plan meets the PUD Intent and Purpose provision and all other PUD ordinance provisions. The flexibility provided by the PUD allows for a better site layout and coordination between the two uses on the site. Staff believes this standard has been met. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the Preliminary Plan for Liberty Crossing PUD No. 123, subject to the following conditions: 1. The plans prepared by Tanek, submitted March 12, 2015, shall become a part of this approval. 2. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Fire Department, dated April 8, 2015, shall become a part of this approval. 3. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Engineering Division, dated April 9, 2015, shall become a part of this approval. 4. Public bicycle racks or similar facilities for the parking/storage of a minimum of 14 bicycles shall be provided, based on a calculation of 5%of the 276 parking spaces required for the apartment building. 5. All signage must meet the requirements of the City's Sign Code (Section 4.20). 6. The Final Plat shall include "P.U.D. No. 123" in its title. 7. A park dedication fee of$60,100, or 2%of the land value, shall be paid before release of the Final Plat. 8. This approval is subject to all other state,federal, and local ordinances, regulations, or laws with authority over this development. Zoning Map Amendment The properties at 7751-7775 Medicine Lake Road, 2480 Winnetka Avenue North, and 2485 Rhode Island Avenue North are currently zoned Commercial. The property at 2430 Winnetka Avenue North is currently zoned Light Industrial. Under the proposal, the Zoning Map would need to be amended so that all of the properties would be zoned as High Density Residential (R-4), which provides for high density housing of over 12 units per acre. Based on the density of the proposed PUD of 22.7 units per acre, High Density Residential zoning would be the most appropriate designation for this site. This would be consistent with the recently revised land use designation of High Density Residential on the City's General Land Use Plan Map. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the Zoning Map Amendment, rezoning 7751-7775 Medicine Lake Road, 2480 Winnetka Avenue North, and 2485 Rhode Island Avenue North from Commercial to High Density Residential (R-4) and 2430 Winnetka Avenue North from Light Industrial to High Density Residential (R-4). Attachments Location Map (1 page) Applicant's Narrative (2 pages) Memo from the Fire Department dated April 8, 2015 (4 pages) Memo from the Engineering Division dated April 9, 2015 (7 pages) Neighborhood Meeting presentation from March 31, 2015 (9 pages) High Density Residential (R-4) Zoning District Section of City Code (3 pages) Official Zoning Map (1 page) Plans from Tanek Architecture submitted March 12, 2015 (7 pages) Site Survey submitted March 30, 2015 (1 page) Preliminary Plat submitted April 8, 2015 (1 page) Regular Meeting of the Golden Valley Planning Commission April 13, 2015 regular meeting of the lanning Commission was held at the Golden Valley City Hall, it Chambers, 780 Golden Valley R,_,., , ; Iden Valley, Minnesota, on Monday, April 13; Chair KI chka called- e'°meeting to order at 7 pm. Those present were Commissioners Baker, Blum, Cera, Kluchka, Segelbaum, and Waldhau -,'_Iso resenn nning Manager Jason Zimmerman, Associate Planner/_. arit Writer mily Goellner, City er Jeff Oliver, and Administrative A nt Lisa Wittma . Commissioner Johnson wa sent. 1. Approval of Minutes March 23, 2015, Regular Planning Commission Meeting MOVED by Waldhauser, seconded by Cera and motion carried unanimously to approve the March 23, 2015, minutes as submitted. 2. Informal Public Hearing — Preliminary PUD Plan — Liberty Crossing — Medicine Lake Road and Winnetka Avenue North — PU-123 Applicant: Intuitive Investments Addresses: 7751-7775 Medicine Lake Road, 2430 and 2480 Winnetka Avenue North, and 2485 Rhode Island Avenue North Purpose: To allow a 184 unit apartment building and 63 townhome units. 3. Informal Public Hearing — Property Rezoning — Liberty Crossing — Medicine Lake Road and Winnetka Avenue North —ZO14-07 Applicant: Intuitive Investments Addresses: 7751-7775 Medicine Lake Road, 2430 and 2480 Winnetka Avenue North, and 2485 Rhode Island Avenue North Purpose: To rezone the properties from Commercial and Light Industrial to High Density Residential (R-4) The Informal Public Hearings and discussion for Items 2 and 3 were combined. Zimmerman explained the applicant's request to develop a 184 unit, five story apartment building and 63 townhome units across four existing parcels near the intersection of Winnetka Avenue and Medicine Lake Road. He referred to a site plan and noted that the development would replace the existing VFW, the Asian restaurant, the car wash and the vacant SIFCO building. The Midland Auto, Dairy Queen and Walgreens buildings would remain. He reminded the Commissioners that these Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission April 13, 2015 Page 2 properties were re-designated on the General Land Use Plan Map from Commercial and Light Industrial to High Density Residential in December of 2014, and so they must now be rezoned to High Density Residential in order to be consistent. Zimmerman discussed the parking for the development. He stated that the apartment building requires 276 spaces and the applicant is providing 288 spaces (232 underground, 56 surface). The townhomes require 126 spaces and the applicant is providing 138 spaces. He added that the applicant is also providing an additional 39 spaces along the internal driveways and will need to provide 14 spaces for bicycles. Zimmerman referred to a site plan and discussed the existing and proposed access points and the pedestrian circulation plan. He stated that there have been discussions with staff and the developer about vacating a portion of Rhode Island Avenue along the east side of the project in order to build a swale to help divert water, and to do some innovative stormwater management. He explained that this is the low point and historically there have been flooding issues along Medicine Lake Road and in the DeCola Ponds system. He stated that a significant amount of flood storage is needed and that creative stormwater management, including underground storage tanks on this site, could help the overall conditions in the area and would reduce the pressure of flooding downstream. Kluchka questioned who would own the proposed swale and vacated area. Zimmerman said the details haven't been fully worked out, but the assumption is that the City would maintain ownership of the existing right-of-way and possibly the swale depending on where it is built. Zimmerman discussed the proposed rezoning of the properties. He noted that the High Density Residential zoning district allows for densities of over 12 units per acre. The proposed density for this proposal is 247 units on 10.88 acres which equals 22.7 units per acre. Blum asked about the amount of impervious surface currently on these parcels. Zimmerman stated there is approximately 64% impervious surface on these parcels now, this proposed development will drop that number down to 63%, and the percentage will drop further once the changes on Rhode Island Avenue occur. Waldhauser asked if the water issues are surface water issues or ground water issues. Zimmerman said the issues are with surface water and overflowing ponds. Segelbaum asked what other steps the City, along with the Cities of New Hope and Crystal, have been taken regarding flood mitigation. Zimmerman explained the different standards and definitions in the TP40 model versus the new Atlas 14 standards which changes the flood elevations and requires cities to plan differently for flood prone areas. He added that Golden Valley, New Hope and Crystal have been studying the situation and how to deal with the issues as properties get redeveloped. Segelbaum asked if this project is an opportunity to deal with the situation more quickly than the City otherwise would have. Zimmerman said yes, and said it would be much more difficult if all four of these parcels weren't included in the proposal. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission April 13, 2015 Page 3 Baker asked if homes in this area have been acquired due to flooding issues. Oliver said homes throughout the City have been acquired and flood proofed, but not in this area. He stated that there are 37 properties in this water sub-shed that are at risk for flood damage. He explained how the new Atlas 14 model helps provide a more accurate determination of flood levels to help offer the highest degree of protection. Baker asked if the Atlas 14 takes climate change into account. Oliver said the Atlas 14 model looks at historical data and doesn't make projections. Kluchka asked how the proposed underground parking for this development is possible given the flooding issues. Oliver said it is possible. The high point will have to be set at 2 feet above the 1% flood elevation. Waldhauser asked if the underground storage tanks would displace water that would otherwise be stored there. Oliver said he is most concerned about surface water, not groundwater and that the goal is to help resolve flooding issues. Baker asked about the capacity of the proposed underground storage tanks. He also asked if similar tanks could be used in the vacated Rhode Island Avenue area. Zimmerman said the capacity of the tanks is approximately 7 to 8 acre feet. He added that tanks cannot be used in the vacated Rhode Island Avenue area because of the location of the utilities. Cera questioned who will pay for what regarding the stormwater management. Zimmerman stated that the applicant has some responsibility to manage the stormwater on their property and that the City has some responsibilities too. He added that the City and the County will be working together with the developer to obtain grants as well. Kluchka asked what could be built on these properties under their current zoning designation without a PUD. Zimmerman stated that any commercial use could occur on the properties zoned Commercial and any light industrial use could occur on the former SIFCO property which is zoned Light Industrial. Todd Schachtman, Applicant, said as he studied the VFW parcel and the parcel to the south it became clear that this could be an opportunity to shape this gateway location. He stated that are big problems with the current water situation and this project is an opportunity to help fix the problems and he is excited to pave the way to the future in this corridor. He said there will be an area commemorating the VFW and the community room will be able to be used by the VFW. He said this area hasn't had any real development in 30 to 40 years and this project will allow options in housing. He said they are proposing market rate housing and there is potential for retail development in the future. Tom Dillon, Intuitive Invesments, Applicant, said that there hasn't been any new housing opportunities in this area for many years and that he likes the mix of housing being proposed. He stated that originally they had a much denser project but once they started to learn about the flooding issues, they changed their plans. He stated that they Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission April 13, 2015 Page 4 will reduce the flooding by approximately 20%, which is significant. He added that the south end of the site has less of a water issue, and that there will be no buildings located over the underground storage tanks. Baker asked where the entrance to the underground parking would be located. Schachtman referred to a site plan and stated that the entrance to the parking would be located on the southeast corner of the apartment building and accessed from Rhode Island Avenue. Cera asked about the size of the underground parking area. Dillon said the underground parking will be located underneath the entire apartment building as well as the surface guest parking area, and the amenity area. Waldhauser asked why there are two access points on Winnetka Avenue. Elisa Richardson, Tanek Architects, explained that the south entrance would be for access to the underground parking and the north entrance would be for visitors and guests. Kluchka asked the applicant to consider signage for the two entrances. Baker asked about the existing access road between Walgreen's property and Dairy Queen's property. Richardson stated that they don't have any intent to use that for access because it is not wide enough, it is just a part of the VFW's property. Cera asked if that access will remain open. Dillon said they may landscape the area a bit more, but it won't change from how it is currently being used. Segelbaum asked how much stormwater management is needed for this proposed development versus how much the City is asking the applicant to provide. Schachtman stated that with or without their development the problem is still there. He stated that this is the area that collects water from all over and that this proposal is an opportunity to help improve the situation. Segelbaum asked if this site could be built without the underground storage tanks. Richardson said the tanks will benefit their site, but they are larger than what their site needs. She added that the open area shown on the plans will be used as a water filtration basin for the water on their site. Nate Shea, Tanek Architects, said they aren't using the underground tanks for their site, it is for dealing with the water issues outside of their site. Baker asked about the probability of using solar energy. Schachtman said the probability is great, and that solar will absolutely be used on the apartment building. He said he is looking for ways to save energy and to be a net provider. He added that they are also looking at innovative ways to irrigate this development. Waldhauser asked about the size of the proposed units and the range of rents. Schachtman said the apartment building will have 30 studio units and 99 1-bedroom units ranging from 564 to 887 square feet, 45 2-bedroom units ranging in size from 1,073 to 1,136 square feet, and 10 3-bedroom units ranging in size from 1,334 to 1,412 square feet. He said he wants to provide a range of options and choice. He said the townhomes will have their own garages and a wide variety of floor plans and sizes. He said the rents will be typical market rate, but he doesn't know the exact amount at this time. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission April 13, 2015 Page 5 Baker asked if there will be any affordable units. Schachtman said they would consider that because they want to offer a broad spectrum of options for tenants to consider. Segelbaum asked if they will continue to own and manage the property. He said the Steven Scott Company will manage the property. Kluchka asked for a description of the exterior materials. Richardson said the materials aren't finalized yet, but there will be a blend of materials. She showed some renderings of the buildings and said they are looking at materials that will withstand time and look nice. She said there will be a wood-look product, Hardie products, and metal panel accents. She added that the townhomes and apartments would not match, but they would look like a family. Kluchka referred to the landscaping plans and asked about the applicant's approach to sidewalk connections and neighborhood connections. Schachtman said he thinks good connections are what ultimately makes a good development. He said he sees a benefit in how they connect to the rest of the area. Richardson added that the east side of the project will be more developed once they know the design of the swale. She said they want a connection with Walgreen's and that they will be working with a landscape architect to give the townhomes a front yard feel. She stated that the clubhouse area would have more screening and there will be more canopy trees where guests come in to the property. Kluchka asked about the landscaping along Winnetka Avenue. Schachtman said they will plant some evergreen trees to create a buffer. Richardson stated that they are planning to move the sidewalks in further from the street as well, to make them safer. Schachtman added that there will also be some car charging stations. Kluchka opened the public hearing. Chris Gemlo, 1925 Kelly Drive, said this looks like an exciting development, but he is not totally convinced of the flood mitigation issues yet. He said he wasn't notified of the DeCola Ponds meeting held prior to this meeting until last Saturday and that a large majority of the stakeholders were overlooked. He worries the swale will increase the flow and speed of water through the flood area into the Pennsylvania Pond. He said he hasn't seen data that the swale will be enough to alleviate the water flow, or of the sanitary conditions of the water that will flow through. He said he is curious to know who will maintain and own the swale. He referred to the portion of Rhode Island Avenue that is proposed to be vacated and said the neighbors to the south use the sidewalks along Rhode Island Avenue. He questioned the amount and type of traffic that will be created by this development and how it is being addressed. He added that there is no public playground anywhere near this development. Renee Plumart, 7500 Winnetka Heights Drive, said the SIFCO site definitely needs redevelopment and she is encouraged to see development happening. She referred to the VFW site, which is the lowest area, and questioned why the City wouldn't purchase that property and create a pond area for additional storage. She said she is also concerned about the swale expediting the flow of water and she questioned who will pay for and maintain the underground storage vaults, and if it will increase the cost of Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission April 13, 2015 Page 6 the townhomes. She said it seems that the developer is trying to cram a lot on this site and trying to do a little bit of everything and maybe not doing any of them well. She said she would like the City to consider this area for ponding instead. Carl Hoffstedt, 2450 Valders Avenue North, said the area was a swamp at one time and the low point on Medicine Lake in front of the VFW floods whenever there is intense rain. He said Walgreens had to replace a lot of their soils so this developer will probably have to do quite a bit of excavating and backfill. He said he is concerned about the underground parking with the water issues in this area and he hopes they won't have to raise the height of the proposed apartment building. He said when the Dover Hill apartment was first built it stuck out, but now that the trees have matured it helps with screening, so he would like to see more visual screening of this proposed apartment building. He said this is a significant development and it will put more traffic on Winnetka Avenue and there is also a site problem at 23rd and Winnetka Avenues so he would like to see a traffic impact study done to show the traffic conflicts. He said he expects to see a higher quality of design and hopes the number of police calls with this development will also be taken into consideration. Tim Cornelius, 8405 Patsy Lane, said he is concerned about traffic. He said he has changed his driving habits and no longer uses Duluth Street. He said he is concerned about Douglas Drive being changed to one lane in each direction. He asked if there is a plan in the future for Winnetka to have a one directional lane. He said he uses Rhode Island Avenue a lot and he is concerned Winnetka will change and he won't be able to get across it. Marti Micks, 90 Louisiana Avenue South, referred to the Laurel Avenue ponds and asked if similar ponds could be required on the northern part of this proposed PUD. Marjorie Ostrov, 1788 Maryland Avenue North, asked if any consideration has been given to requiring slightly larger units to keep this an upper to middle class area. She said tiny apartments would bring in people who usually live downtown and a larger number of units will affect the traffic. She said she wants the development to be appropriate for a suburb, rather than a downtown. Paula Longendyke, 6747 Medicine Lake Road, said with this many single and one- bedroom units there will be young people who tend to drive faster so she is concerned about traffic patterns and safety. She said there is already a lot of high density in this area. George Maxwell, 1945 Kelly Drive, said he has similar concerns about the proposed swale and the volume of water running into the pond at a quicker rate than it does now. He said generally he is for development that will help address the flood storage and he thinks it is a good idea to capitalize on those opportunities. Seeing and hearing no one else wishing to comment, Kluchka closed the public hearing. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission April 13, 2015 Page 7 Cera there are two issues. One is the DeCola ponds issue and the other is the specific development proposal. Baker asked if there were not the surface flow from the north what sort of water storage this development would require in and of itself. Oliver said he can't separate what is coming from the north from the entire watershed. He clarified that if this were an area that was not prone to flooding the applicant could typically accommodate rate control and flood control on site with a pond or a small below ground vault. He said as shown, the development is a net neutral, but in working with this developer there is an opportunity to get expanded storage. Baker asked what the difference in the capacity would be if the proposed townhomes on the northeast corner were a pond instead. Oliver said a pond in that location would have minimal impact and would be detrimental to the intersection. He said in his opinion the north end of the site would not be appropriate for ponding. Segelbaum asked Oliver to clarify what he meant by "net neutral." Oliver said the below ground storage in combination with the swale will mitigate the lost storage from this development. He reiterated that the solution will be a long process, but this is one opportunity to help the current issues. Waldhauser asked if the grade of the entire property will be raised before it is built on. Oliver said yes. Waldhauser asked if that will make the apartment building taller. Oliver said the south end of the site is already higher. Waldhauser questioned what options Golden Valley and the surrounding cities were considering to deal with the flooding problem. Oliver said they've been studying the area for four or five years and have identified the need for significant storage. He said at some point in time storage would have been developed similar to what is being proposed in this development. Kluchka asked how the swale works. Oliver said it is basically a dry stream channel. He said the intent is to serve as storage and get the water from point A to point B. Baker asked if the underground tanks require maintenance. Oliver said the maintenance issues will be addressed during the final design review. He said he anticipates that the City will own and maintain these facilities due to their regional significance. Baker said it would be helpful to see an elevation of the swale and the storage tanks. Blum referred to the comment regarding sanitation issues. Oliver said to his knowledge, there won't be sanitation issues associated with the storage tanks. Waldhauser asked if the quality of water going into the pond will be affected. Oliver said the developer will be required to meet City and Bassett Creek Watershed Commission requirements. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission April 13, 2015 Page 8 Kluchka asked for clarification on the funding for the water storage proposals. Oliver said staff along with the Cities of Crystal and New Hope have had discussions with Hennepin County and are exploring other avenues to help with funding. Baker said he doesn't want to vote on a recommendation without knowing how this will be funded. Kluchka asked about traffic volumes and future plans for Winnetka Avenue. Oliver said the City has not asked the developer to do a traffic study. He said there may be some issues during the peak hours, however this residential proposal will be less of a burden than an office use would be. He said there are no plans at this point in time for a major re-construct of Winnetka Avenue and that Hennepin County will be doing a mill and overlay on the north end of Winnetka this summer. Kluchka asked if Winnetka will ever be changed to a three-lane road. Oliver said there have been no discussions about turning Winnetka into a three-lane road. Baker asked about the pedestrian crossing at Medicine Lake Road and Winnetka and what effect this development will have. Oliver said the City strongly encourages pedestrians to cross at the intersections. He said he doesn't know that there will be an adverse impact due to this development, but he doesn't think the peaks with this proposal and the schools in the area will coincide. Baker asked if there will be any consideration of a traffic control near the south entrance. Oliver said there would more likely be traffic control at 23rd and Winnetka if warrants are met, at the County's discretion. Segelbaum asked if the existing sidewalk on the east side of Rhode Island will remain or if it would be removed if Rhode Island Avenue is vacated. Zimmerman said that is still to be determined. He added that the City wants good east-west and north-south connections. Baker asked if the swale would preclude sidewalks. Zimmerman said no. Kluchka asked the applicant if there will be a playground. Schachtman said there will be a playground area, a pool, and an area for dogs. Kluchka asked Schachtman about what led to the decision regarding the size of the apartment units. Schachtman said the apartments are in-line, or slightly larger than what is commonly seen in the metro area. He added that they are proposing a lot of windows as well to allow as much natural light as possible. Kluchka said he would like to see a comparison of the size of these apartment units to other apartments in Golden Valley. Baker asked if the playground could be open to the public. Schachtman said yes, he'd be amenable to that. Waldhauser asked if there is play space at the Dover Hill apartments. Zimmerman said he didn't know. Waldhauser said she is not sure she, or future residents, want the play space at this development to be the play space for the entire area. Segelbaum asked the applicant if he is confident that they've got a handle on the soil conditions. Schachtman said yes, they've done extensive geotechnical studies on the parcels so they know what kind of soils are there. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission April 13, 2015 Page 9 Cera referred to the design of the proposed buildings and asked the applicant if they would consider adding some articulation. Schachtman said they are at the very beginning of the design process and that they will do a first class job on the design. Waldhauser asked if there is enough space on the west side of the property to plant some large trees. Schachtman said yes, there are plenty of species they could select and they've learned a lot about best practices from their past projects. Kluchka asked about police activity in the area. Zimmerman said he hasn't heard any complaints, but he would check with the Police Department. Kluchka said the Medicine Lake Road/Winnetka Avenue intersection is not in good repair for bikers and pedestrians. Oliver said he would check with the County to see if they are planning any pedestrian improvements with their overlay plans. Baker asked if Winnetka is wide enough for a bike lane. Oliver said he didn't think so without converting it to a three lane road. Kluchka asked the Commissioners if they want to recommend that a traffic study be done. Segelbaum said he thinks a study would show that the roads can handle the capacity but his concern would be the turns in and out of the development. Baker suggested they ask for a study showing how the traffic will function. Cera suggested they recommend a traffic and safety study. Kluchka said he would like to add design review and approval as a condition of approval. Waldhauser asked if the developer would be installing the sidewalk on Rhode Island. Kluchka said that sidewalk is a priority and suggested that be reviewed during the Final PUD process. Waldhauser said this is probably the best thing the City can do to start addressing the water issue. She said this is a nice use of the property and will offer a true variety in the types of houses. Baker said he often thinks about the importance of a PUD being a benefit to the City. He said there is a benefit with the developer helping address water problems. He said he also likes the fact that there is interest in developing with a green component. Segelbaum said he thinks this project is a positive enhancement to the area. Kluchka said he would like to challenge the developer around design and how this development will work with the neighborhood, how it connects to its context, and how it becomes an extension of an existing neighborhood. MOVED by Cera, seconded by Blum and motion carried unanimously to recommend approval of the Preliminary PUD Plan for Liberty Crossing PUD No. 123, subject to the following findings and conditions: Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission April 13, 2015 Page 10 Findings: 1. The PUD plan is tailored to the specific characteristics of the site and achieves a higher quality of site planning and design than generally expected under conventional provisions of the ordinance. The applicant worked closely with the City during a lengthy pre-application process—and has continued to refine the proposal—in order to accommodate the unique circumstances surrounding the site. The flexibility allowed under a PUD is necessary to achieve the outcome that will not only benefit the applicant, but the City as a whole. 2. The PUD plan preserves and protects substantial desirable portions of the site's characteristics, open space and sensitive environmental features including steep slopes, trees, scenic views, creeks, wetlands, and open waters. Given the lack of open space or other sensitive environmental features on the site today, there is little available for the applicant to preserve. However, the proposal does take advantage of the natural areas of Pennsylvania Woods and DeCola Pond B to the east and, in partnership with the City, will use a constructed swale to manage stormwater more effectively and result in the creation of additional green space within in the Rhode Island Avenue right of way. 3. The PUD plan includes efficient and effective use (which includes preservation) of the land. The proposal not only provides for an increase in residential density in an underutilized area well served by transit, but the creative inclusion of regional flood storage within the development provides a benefit to the greater area. 4. The PUD Plan results in development compatible with adjacent uses and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and redevelopment plans and goals. The use of this property for higher density residential use is compatible with the neighboring property to the east and the density being proposed is consistent with the City's revised Comprehensive Plan. 5. The PUD plan is consistent with preserving and improving the general health, safety and general welfare of the people of the City. The potential for reduction in flooding along Medicine Lake Road and within the DeCola Ponds area provides great benefit to the City and its residents. 6. The PUD plan meets the PUD Intent and Purpose provision and all other PUD ordinance provisions. The flexibility provided by the PUD allows for a better site layout and coordination between the two uses on the site. Conditions: 1. The plans prepared by Tanek, submitted March 12, 2015, shall become a part of this approval. 2. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Fire Department, dated April 8, 2015, shall become a part of this approval. 3. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Engineering Division, dated April 9, 2015, shall become a part of this approval. 4. Public bicycle racks or similar facilities for the parking/storage of a minimum of 14 bicycles shall be provided, based on a calculation of 5% of the 276 parking spaces required for the apartment building. 5. All signage must meet the requirements of the City's Sign Code (Section 4.20). 6. The Final Plat shall include "P.U.D. No. 123" in its title. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission April 13, 2015 Page 11 7. A park dedication fee of$60,100, or 2% of the land value, shall be paid before release of the Final Plat. 8. A traffic, pedestrian and safety study shall be done as a part of the Final PUD proposal. 9. The application will be subject to design review and approval that would include elevations, materials, and landscaping. 10.This approval is subject to all other state, federal, and local ordinances, regulations, or laws with authority over this development. Waldhauser questioned if the recommended traffic and safety study should go with this proposal or if the Commission should send a letter to the City Council saying this area seems to have some issues that should be addressed. Segelbaum said the traffic and safety impact is tied to this development. Oliver said typically the City will perform the traffic study with the developer posting escrow to cover the costs. Segelbaum said he would like the study to be limited to the issues they've discussed. MOVED by Waldhauser, seconded by Segelbaum and motion carried unanimously to recommend approval of rezoning the properties at 7751-7775 Medicine Lake Road, 2480 Winnetka Avenue North, and 2485 Rhode Island Avenue North from Commercial to High Density Residential (R-4) and the property at 2430 Winnetka Avenue North from Light Industrial to High Density Residential (R-4). Informal Public Hearing - G neral Land Use Plan Map Amendment— 9000 and 9050 Golden Vall Road — CPAM-56 licant: City of Golden Iley Addre s: 9000 and 9050 olden Valley Road k' Purpose: change the signation on the General Land Use Plan Map from Co ercial to esidential High Density. Goellner stated that the City Co cil iscussed a senior ho ' g proposal at their March 10 Council/Manager meeting and directed sta art the General Land Use Plan Map amendment process to re-guide a vaca operties located at 9000 and 9050 Golden Valley Road from Commercia°It Density Residential. She referred to a site map and stated that these two prop e s a ocated in the Highway 55 Redevelopment Area. She explained that the M pol an C 'I has said that the number of households in Golden Valle ' expect 'd to increa 17% by the year 2040 and that the population is expected De 24,300 by'2040. To acc modate this growth, the City is considering increas' housing density ',n appropriate to tions. Kluchka as if the property to the we at 9110 Golden Valley Road is designated Medium ensity. Goellner said yes. Klu ` ka asked if there is future development planned for t property. Zimmerman said the C has some interest in seeing that property r eveloped, but there is not an interest " seller at this point. val.ley Fire Department 763-593-8079/763-593-8098 (fax) Date: April 6, 2015 To: Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager Cc: Jeff Oliver, City Engineer From: John Crelly, Fire Chief Subject: Preliminary PUD #123 for Liberty Crossings The Golden Valley Fire Department has reviewed the preliminary PUD plans submitted on March 12, 2015 for Liberty Crossings. This Preliminary PUD application proposes the removal of 4 existing structures and the construction of a 6 story apartment building, a clubhouse/fitness center and a variety of 63 single-story and two-story townhouses grouped in clusters of either 2, 3, 4 or 6 units. SITE ACCESS The current proposal has 3 points of access to public streets. One entrance off of Rhode Island Avenue from the south and two entrances off of Winnetka Avenue. All private roads on site are designed with a minimum width of between 26 % feet to 30 feet. The plans shows truck movements throughout the site confirming that a minimum width of 20 feet and a 45 foot turning radius will accommodate larger trucks as required by the Minnesota State Fire Code (MSFC). Based on the vehicle movements ALL personal vehicle parking will need to in designated parking stalls as shown on the plan. Nose in parking in front of the two-story townhouse that face each other will not be allowed due to the limited road width / limit space in front of the garages. Areas that are not designated parking will need to be properly identified with yellow painted curbing and signage as required by MSFC. The plans do not give specifics on what standard the roads will be constructed to. Minnesota State Fire Code (MSFC) section 503.2.3 states: "Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus and shall be surfaced so as to provide all-weather driving capabilities". In general the fire department will NOT drive a fire Page 1 of 4 engine or a ladder truck on private roadway for the purpose of providing emergency services unless the surfaces have been designed to carry the imposed loads of commercial vehicles. Roadways that are not designed to support the imposed loads will incur damage when driven on. Large emergency vehicles may be in danger of breaking through the bituminous surface and getting stuck. These same concerns would also impact garbage trucks and other large commercial vehicles. BUILDING/SITE In reviewing the requirements of MSFC section 503.1.1 of providing access to within 150 feet of all portions of the buildings. All of the 2 family, 3 family, 4 family and 6 family townhouse are compliant with this code requirement. The apartment building is NOT compliant with this requirement. It should be noted that the Fire Code Official is authorized to increase this dimension if the building is protected throughout with a fire sprinkler system. Currently the apartment building is not complaint. In lieu of the 150 feet of access provision, the City will trade off limited access for a building that is fully protected by fire sprinklers including areas that are typically exempt such as small bath rooms, closets and possibly decks. Also, the inclusion of additional wet standpipes for fire hoses, spaced in a way that would provide floor coverage to all areas using 100 feet of hose and 30 feet of hose stream reach. Radio operability—All new buildings shall have approved radio coverage for emergency responders within the building based upon the existing coverage levels of the public safety communication systems of the jurisdiction at the exterior of the building. The building shall be considered to have acceptable emergency responder radio coverage when signal strength measurements in 95 percent of all areas on each floor of the building meet the minimum signal strength requirement of-95 dBm receivable and transmittable from the building. WATER SUPPLY The new 6 story apartment building is proposed to be of type III-B construction with an approximate size of 240,000 sq. ft. In reviewing the water flow requirements of the Minnesota State Fire Code (MSFC) appendix B and C, this building requires a water flow in excess of 8,000 gpm.The building is required to be protected with a fire sprinkler suppression system. Based on MSFC, a 50% reduction in water flow will be allowed which equates to a required flow of 4,000 gpm. Based on the number of hydrants shown on the plan and the way they are spaced, the building appears to be complaint with the requirements of MSFC appendix B and C. The townhouses are also required by code to be protected with a fire sprinkler suppression system. Base on the requirements of the MSFC, the requirements for the number of fire hydrants and the spacing appears to be compliant. It appears that this 8-inch line is a combination water line serving both domestic and fire suppression water systems. Based on the current configuration, the maximum size domestic line that could be split off is 2-inch. Based on other large apartment buildings in the City, a 2- inch domestic line will not be adequate for serving this building. It is recommended that an 8- inch fire line and a separate parallel XX-inch domestic water line be installed which connects directly to the 8-inch water main located in the street. The 8-inch fire protection water line running into the south side of the building shall be arranged in accordance with 2010 edition of NFPA 24 section 6.2.11 options 1, 2 or 6. a. Option 1: A Yard Post Indicator Valve (YPIV) 40 feet from the building. b. Option 2: no YPIV,just bring the fire protection water directly into a 1 hour fire rated room with direct exterior access into the room. c. Option 3: no YPIV,just bring the fire protection water directly into a non-fire rated room and providing a Wall Post Indicator Valve (WPIV). The installation of the fire hydrants shall be within 100 feet of any fire department sprinkler/standpipe connection located on the building. The plan does not indicate a location of the fire department connection. City and private fire hydrants may be used when determining the 100 feet distance. The layout of water mains throughout the development consists of a network of 8-inch piping with two connections to the water main on Rhode Island Avenue North. There is a total of 10 fire hydrants throughout the development. Currently there are not any sectional control valves shown within the development which means the entire complex would need to be shut down for a single water main break. Also, there appears to be no sectional control valves on the water main along the Rhode Island Avenue. Sectional valves need to be added within the development and the main serving the northeast area should be looped out to the water main on either Medicine Lake Road or Winnetka Avenue N. These issues should be discussed with the Cities Engineering Department. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS Staff recommends approval subject to following conditions: 1. Site access to within 150 feet of all exterior portions of the apartment building has not been provided. Prior to the final PUD approval the developer shall work with Fire Department Staff to develop an acceptable tradeoff for not meeting access requirements of the MSFC 2. Prior to occupancy of this project the property owner, the contractor and Fire Department Staff need to identify all areas that need to be designated as fire lane. Areas that are to be designated fire lane shall have the curbs painted yellow and no parking fire lanes signs shall be installed. 3. After the apartment building is substantially completed, the owner will have a qualified company evaluate 800 mhz radio signals in the lower levels of the apartment building. Areas that fall short of adequate signal strength shall be corrected. 4. All Roads shall be designed to carry the imposed vehicle loads of fire vehicles. The design of the road shall be reviewed by the City Engineer. 5. Prior to final PUD approval, the water main system shall be reviewed and approved by City Engineering Staff and Fire Department Staff. This would include the addition of sectional control valves and possible connection to the water main on either Medicine Lake Road or Winnetka Avenue N. 6. Prior to final PUD approval, the configuration of the fire line serving the apartment building needs to identified and conform to one of the three options allowed by code 7. Prior to final PUD approval, the arrangement of piping for the domestic water line serving the apartment building needs to be identified. If you have any questions, please contact me at 763-593-8065, or e-mail jcrellv@goldenvalleymn.gov city 0 V goldenl , MEMORANDUM va e Physical Development Department 763-593-8030/763-593-3988(fax) Date: April 9, 2015 To: Ut/son Zimmerman, Planning MXan From: Jeff Oliver, PE, City Engineer Eric Eckman, Public Works Specialist Subject: Liberty Crossing PUD#123—Preliminary PUD Review Engineering staff has reviewed the plans for the proposed Liberty Crossing planned unit development (PUD), submitted by Intuitive Investments (Developer). The proposed PUD is located between Winnetka Avenue and Rhode Island Avenue, immediately south of Medicine Lake Road. The PUD is approximately 10.8 acres and is comprised of four existing commercial properties. The proposed redevelopment of the site includes the construction of a 184-unit apartment building, 63 townhomes and a community building with an outdoor pool. This memorandum discusses the issues identified during the Engineering review that must be addressed prior to final PUD plan submittal. The comments contained in this review are based on the plans submitted to the City on March 16, 2015. Preliminary Site Plan The proposed PUD includes the demolition of four existing commercial properties and the construction of new apartments and townhomes. The five-story apartment building will be generally located in the southeast portion of the site and will include one level of underground parking beneath the apartment property. The townhomes will be distributed around the site to include the following: 24 units located in the north portion of the site; 28 units in the west portion of the site; and 11 units located along the south boundary of the PUD. As part of the proposed PUD,the four commercial buildings will be demolished to make way for the redevelopment. The Developer must obtain the appropriate City permits for demolition of the existing buildings, and removal of all utilities, pavements, and other related infrastructure. Flood Mitigation The portion of the PUD located near the intersection of Medicine Lake Road and Rhode Island Avenue experiences significant flooding during large precipitation events.The cities of Golden Valley, New Hope, and Crystal have been studying this area as part of the Medicine Lake Road and Winnetka Avenue Area Long Term Flood Mitigation Study. As such,the Developer has been G:\Developments-Private\Liberty Crossing\Memos\Liberty_PrelimPUD_Review_040615.docx working with the City to ensure that the new development is constructed above the flood elevations, while mitigating any potential flood impacts that may result from the development and potentially creating additional flood storage to benefit the entire subwatershed. The preliminary site plan shows the construction of a large conveyance swale and underground storage tank in the northeast corner of the site, and also within public right-of-way, as a way to mitigate any potential flood impacts and potentially create additional flood storage. The plan also shows the removal of a portion of Rhode Island Avenue between the Dover Hill entrance and the proposed south entrance to the development. The pavement will be replaced with a vegetated open space, including the conveyance Swale, in this area. Because of the complexity of the flooding issues, and the potential public benefit,the City has retained a consultant to work on the preliminary design of the conveyance swale and underground flood storage tank, including working closely with the Developer to ensure compatibility with the plans. Upon preliminary review of the plans submitted by the Developer, staff recommends that the Developer continue to work with the City to explore ways to increase the volume of flood storage in order to maximize the long term flood mitigation efforts within the subwatershed. It is early in the collaborative design process and therefore additional discussion will continue as the project moves forward. Access and Circulation There are currently eight driveways serving the existing commercial properties,five of which are located on Hennepin County Highways (three on Winnetka Avenue and two on Medicine Lake Road). The preliminary PUD plans submitted show an overall reduction in the number of driveways, with two proposed access points onto Winnetka Avenue and one onto Rhode Island Avenue in the southeast corner of the site. Engineering staff generally supports the access plan and the reduction in driveways, but raises the following concerns that need to be discussed further with the Developer: 1. Address how the Walgreens south access road that connects Winnetka to Rhode Island Avenue will interact with the Development. 2. Address the shared driveway on Winnetka that also serves the Dairy Queen. (The VFW property currently includes a 12-foot strip of land that extends west to Winnetka, and no access easement is shown on the survey.) 3. Consideration should be made to align proposed driveways with existing driveways that are across the street,to the extent feasible. 4. Staff has concerns about the alignment of the ramp down to the underground parking for the apartments,and how it will operate at the intersection with Rhode Island Avenue (and future cul-de-sac) and the private drive for the development. Details will be discussed further with the Developer before final PUD plan submittal. 5. Provide the proposed load design of the private streets within the development. The PUD includes the removal of existing driveway entrances and the construction of new entrances, both on City and County streets. Therefore, a City Right-of-Way Management Permit is G:\Developments-Private\Liberty Crossing\Memos\Liberty_PrelimPUD_Review_040615.docx required. All driveway entrances must meet the City standards for commercial driveway aprons. In addition, a Hennepin County permit will be required for all work within County right-of-way. Hennepin County is planning a pavement mill and overlay project on Winnetka Avenue in the summer of 2015. If possible,the Developer should attempt to perform the driveway apron work and all utility disconnections and new connections requiring street excavation and restoration, prior to the County mill and overlay project. Utility permits and right-of-way permits will be required from the City and Hennepin County for work within the public right-of-way. Pedestrian Facilities The preliminary site plan submitted by the Developer includes a significant number of sidewalks for internal circulation. Following are comments regarding the sidewalks and trails and connections to the public system: 1. The Developer should explore incorporating connections to the existing Walgreens sidewalk on the south side of the Walgreens property. 2. In the southeast corner of the PUD, staff recommends that the Developer include a connection (or show a future connection) to the City's sidewalk on Rhode Island Avenue, immediately north of the future cul-de-sac. 3. In the northwest corner of the PUD, consider a ramp down or "switch back" to the sidewalk on Medicine Lake Road, west of the stairway shown on the plan, if feasible. 4. The site plan does not show a trail (or future trail) on the west side of the conveyance swale. Consider including this as an amenity for the development. The City will discuss this further with the Developer as part of the preliminary flood mitigation design work. 5. The sidewalk along Winnetka Avenue is owned and maintained by the City and therefore must be reconstructed to meet City standards and ADA guidelines, including the construction of curb ramps at all intersections with driveways. Details will be discussed further with the Developer. Site Survey and Preliminary Plat Site Survey The Developer has submitted an ALTA land title survey of the property within the proposed PUD. The site is comprised of four existing parcels, as summarized below: • VFW site at 7775 Medicine Lake Road (Lot 1, Block 1 of Golden Valley VFW Post Number 7051) • SIFCO site at 2430 Winnetka Avenue (Lot 1, Block 1 of MCTAC Addition) • Car Wash site at 2485 Rhode Island Avenue North (Lot 2, Block 1 of MCTAC Addition) • Restaurant site at 2480 Winnetka Avenue (not part of any plat of record) The existing public easements within the properties above will need to be vacated as part of the development. The City will initiate the vacation process upon application by the Developer, and G:\Developments-Private\Liberty Crossing\Memos\Liberty_PrelimPUD_Review_040615.docx the process will run concurrent with the final plat approval. The Developer must provide the City with legal descriptions and exhibits for the easement vacation, as may be required. Staff noticed there are a number of items, including utilities, that are missing or mislabeled on the survey. Engineering staff will discuss this further with the Developer. Preliminary Plat The Developer has submitted a preliminary plat for review. Prior to final PUD plan submittal, the Developer must include the following items: 1. The dedication of public right-of-way for the future Rhode Island Avenue cul-de-sac in the south end of the PUD, if a cul-de-sac design is the preferred alternative. 2. The dedication of drainage and utility easements over the proposed underground flood storage tank and conveyance swale. 3. The dedication of drainage and utility easements along public streets, property lines, and plat boundaries consistent with the City's Subdivision Ordinance. This PUD is adjacent to County Highways 156 (Winnetka Avenue)and 70 (Medicine Lake Road) and therefore,the plans must also be submitted to Hennepin County for review and comment. Preliminary Utility Plan (Water and Sanitary Sewer) The Developer has submitted a preliminary utility plan showing the extension of new water and sanitary sewer mains into the PUD.The City's water and sanitary sewer systems that provide service to these properties appear to have adequate capacity to accommodate the proposed redevelopment. Staff offers the following comments in regards to the preliminary utility plan: 1. The Developer proposes to loop the watermain through the development with two connections to the City's system on Rhode Island Avenue. In order to minimize water service interruptions within the PUD during future potential water breaks or shut-offs, staff recommends removing the north connection on Rhode Island Avenue and instead connecting to the City's main within Winnetka Avenue. Staff will discuss this further with the Developer prior to final PUD plan submittal. 2. An adequate number of water valves should be proposed and shown on the plans to allow for isolation of certain mains, and to minimize impacts to residents, in the event that a break or shut-off occurs. 3. It is anticipated that the water, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer systems within the PUD will be owned and maintained by the Developer or future property owner. The City and Developer will discuss this in more detail before final PUD plan submittal. 4. The private utilities that currently serve the existing parcels are generally located overhead. To the extent feasible,the new private utilities installed for this PUD must be placed underground. In addition,joint trench construction methods must be employed to minimize the amount of space consumed by the utilities. G:\Developments-Private\Liberty Crossing\Memos\Liberty_PrelimPUD_Review 040615.docx Inflow and Infiltration In order to help reduce the amount of inflow and infiltration of clear water into the sanitary sewer system,the City has an Inflow and Infiltration (1/1) Ordinance. All existing and proposed buildings within the PUD must comply with the City's 1/1 Ordinance. City records show that some of the existing properties do not have 1/1 Certificates of Compliance. The Developer is working with the City to execute deposit agreements prior to the sale of properties, to ensure that existing sewer systems are removed or lined to achieve compliance with the ordinance as part of the development. Upon completion of the sewer work, the new sewer mains and services must be inspected and found to be compliant with the 1/1 ordinance, prior to occupancy of the buildings. In order to complete the utility work described above, the Developer will need to excavate public streets. A City Right-of-Way Management Permit is required for all excavations and obstructions within City right-of-way and easements. All pavements and subgrades must be restored according to City standards. In addition, a Hennepin County permit will be required for all work within County right-of-way. Work on county roads must be coordinated with Hennepin County, especially on Winnetka Avenue as it relates to the timing of the County's mill and overlay project this summer. Stormwater Management This PUD is within the Main Stem subwatershed of the Bassett Creek watershed. More specifically, it is located within the Medicine Lake Road and Winnetka Avenue Area Long Term Flood Mitigation Study area. The site generally drains from north to south via storm sewer systems located within Rhode Island Avenue and Winnetka Avenue, eventually discharging into the DeCola Ponds system and Bassett Creek. The PUD proposes to disturb approximately 10 acres and will reduce the impervious surface area by about 0.5 acres. The PUD is subject to the review and approval of the Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission (BCWMC). Plans will be forwarded to the BCWMC once they are found to be acceptable by the City. According to the preliminary grading, drainage, and erosion control plan submitted by the Developer,the vast majority of the site (over 8 acres) will drain to a stormwater quality treatment system comprised of a pre-treatment basin and filtration basin, before discharge off site. Peak runoff rates, stormwater volume, and phosphorus and sediment loads are being reduced as a result of the stormwater treatment proposed.The Developer has provided stormwater calculations which will be reviewed in more detail, along with the basin designs, prior to final PUD plan submittal. Staff offers the following comments regarding the preliminary grading, drainage, and erosion control plan submitted: 1. The Developer is encouraged to continue to explore adding stormwater practices that will retain or reuse stormwater volume on site, consistent with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Construction Permit,the City's Stormwater Ordinance, and BCWMC requirements. G:\Developments-Private\Liberty Crossing\Memos\Liberty_PrelimPUD_Review_040615.docx 2. The Developer is encouraged to take a more distributive approach that would reduce the size of the largest drainage area into smaller areas with facilities that would provide more effective water quality treatment, and possibly route stormwater away from the flood storage facilities. 3. Storm sewers have been extended throughout the site to accommodate runoff from the new development. The plans do not include pretreatment measures prior to discharge to the basins. Staff recommends including 4-foot deep sump structures fitted with SAFL baffles or similar devices to reduce the amount of sediment that will accumulate in the basins. All storm sewer facilities and stormwater quality treatment facilities within this PUD will be owned and maintained by the Developer or future property owner. A maintenance agreement outlining these responsibilities will be drafted by the City and must be signed by the Developer prior to the issuance of permits. The Developer or contractor must obtain a City Stormwater Management Permit before construction. A stormwater management plan meeting the standards of the City of Golden Valley must be included with the permit application. Plan review and approval by the BCWMC must also be completed before a City Stormwater Management Permit can be issued. This PUD is also subject to the requirements of the MPCA Construction Stormwater Permit. A copy of this permit and the corresponding Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan must be submitted to the City before work can begin. Preliminary Tree Preservation/Landscape Plan The PUD is subject to the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance and Minimum Landscape Standards. A Tree Preservation Plan with a tabular inventory has been submitted by the Developer. Based upon the tree removals proposed,the Developer must obtain a Tree Preservation Permit. In order to determine the mitigation required, the Developer must clearly identify all significant trees within the table submitted as part of the final PUD plans. The plans do not currently include foundation plantings, or the planting of shrubs and perennials within the site as outlined in the City's minimum landscape standards. The Developer must include the proposed landscaping on the final tree preservation and landscape plan. The City Forester will review the plans in more detail once submitted. Financial securities will be based upon the final tree and landscape plans submitted by the Developer. Staff will work with the Developer to determine these amounts once the plans have been received. Summary and Recommendations Engineering staff recommends approval of the Liberty Crossing PUD preliminary PUD plans subject to the comments contained in this review, which are summarized as follows: 1. Staff recommends that the Developer continue to work with the City to explore ways to increase the volume of flood storage in order to maximize the long term flood mitigation efforts within the subwatershed, as discussed in this review. G:\Developments-Private\Liberty Crossing\Memos\Liberty_PrelimPUD Review 040615.docx 2. The Developer must address the site plan comments regarding vehicle access and pedestrian facilities contained in this review. 3. The Developer must address the comments regarding the site survey and preliminary plat contained in this review. 4. This PUD is adjacent to County Highways 156 (Winnetka Avenue) and 70 (Medicine Lake Road) and therefore,the plans must also be submitted to Hennepin County for review and comment. 5. The Developer must address the comments regarding the utility plan as discussed in this review. 6. All sanitary sewer mains and services must be inspected and found to be compliant with the City's 1/1 ordinance, prior to occupancy of the buildings. 7. The Developer must address the comments regarding the preliminary stormwater management plan, as discussed in this review. 8. The Developer must include all proposed landscaping on the final tree preservation and landscape plan, consistent with the City's minimum landscape standards. Approval is also subject to the comments of the City Attorney, Fire Chief, other City staff, and other governmental entities. Please feel free to call me if you have any questions regarding this matter. C: Tom Burt, City Manager Marc Nevinski, Physical Development Director Emily Goellner, Associate Planner John Crelly, Fire Chief Jerry Frevel, Building Official Bert Tracy, Public Works Maintenance Manager Al Lundstrom, Park Maintenance Supervisor and City Forester Kelley Janes, Utilities Supervisor RJ Kakach, Engineer Eric Seaburg, Engineer Tom Hoffman, Water Resources Technician G:\Developments-Private\Liberty Crossing\Memos\liberty_PrelimPUD_Review_040615.docx • _ Medicine Lake Road v µ Medici car repair Da �r car rep r� Quin VFW i `QI -- - ;Q - -- --- - . Zvi,! Walgreens ; a) Df r-- ==. :. -----4i---- 1 e 1 car wash1011- t ; ;Asian Restau,ant (D, r 1 >i 7 Q mL N� 1 >: y? , SIFCO building 1 IT IL 1 4 , 1 , 1 y, 1 wmrwt no! Urs I 1"rl M� � • • s �T i�tnF�1� ��' �� 1'1 .11 :�. � ' � ROW Y h t r ti s a _y i �,J� � 1 3?''�P�� 1.:1 ,. ., lid 1:1 •"71 ! pi � "� � � S f Ft^aT•.Mj .. r...q,Re v ..F A V r� Th•tj + ' i i t1 �y`Ill ..1 9.. . 11 I➢ 1 1I� illl �) �� ' • iI —�� ir•^` R ORi I rwyl 'rwm ■ ma l7a so was Nw w : Fiji+rl4 d: jowl +� 1 1ill �. - �� - '�R ', Isle 11'1�� 's:-.lilt� �,41� � � �■ � •� la � �r��1� • .. 1 t`+1 '�, ,t qI1.i11!111i11/ /11 •1�11i1t namva—�pf. . If - -- � _ l , Y r• •II •, Ii�l I �I I�nd In t r �li� 1!1!!'t'J 1■ � r f �■ 1�+'n NrlmtIt�i i � 'i t � # ii I +., - _ 1�1� Inl i ! ■GI i��l 6.i � � „wi',i i li.� �i� ! Il'�#' - I .ta, f _ _ _ _• tea: { 41 �'�w i r'l 1 1 tett r-t`(_ In rfa j j:L rl L ion "Wf"I"FE I E J z# mss . Liberty Crossing 3.31.2015 1� I ,IrI � I .4 Liberty • • 3.31.2015 1 a T I1�� •,,rl,l�l� ELM ' [at .. A . — �n I — _ 71A °Ar i mill II� Ittl tI ry. %'y p • al ' ' •. -.._.._..".,,,, -.11f! r!t,('>w la a aA� 1#A Inl. lull I Li• i � ��1�IAS _ p: ,� ^�►'a t t i ■! Al 1 �l� 111 I1_ III 1• Inl Ini 1' 113 ntr.I,: .- ILE _j ' ! �� if i r t - y , 51TE AND BUILDING INFORMATION PAWING INFORMATION DWELLING UNIT INFORMATION SIZE PERCENTAGE OF NOTES SITE STALL WUNT LOCATION NOTES LOCATION WIT OOUNT SITE ENGLOBED AP 737 STALLS 9.48EPEP7T LEVEL (4 ACCESSIBLE) APARTtNi 184 WITS ti*k TOT SITE 413)33 SO.FT TOUlWOUSES OI STALLS GARAGES TOBRAIOUSES 63 WITS R9'ERv10U8 1 298,481 SQ FT. 631k TOTAL 353 STALLS TOTAL 241 WITS PARKING 37,988 B2 FT. RILL f0BR10PE DRIYEUl4Y8 NON-ENCLOSED APARII$NT 96 STALLS a1MFALM (4 ACCESSIBLE) RIfERIOR 81REET3 11 18,107 82 FT. iOW410U8E9 38 STALLS 97REEi PARALLEL PERVIOUS n4,136 SO.FT. MM 4 9TALL8 STREET POT. 118 t Street nsTAua DRnEars 51TE LIGHTING Suite3 00 PERCENTAGE OF Minneapolis, 55404 BUILDIPG SIZE SITE FLOORS TOTAL IO 9TALL9 P:612-679-8-8N 225 EUILDRG APARTMENT 400'10 SQ FT. BSMT.3 FLOORS TOTAL SITE 465 STALLS Z F'ER TW WIOUSE sTMBOL STYLEPOLE 1EK*NT LOCATION OJANTRY MANLFACTd7ER FIXTURE F:612-879.8152 Foo FRNrs CLUBNOUBE SA60 SQ Fr. I FLOOR to PER TOaNNO11BES b 6620 82 Fr. 2 FLOORS APARRENT •A POLE LGHT W' RaERIOR STREETS Il MWRAW-ED GALLEON LED •B POLE LGNT 2Y PARKING LOT 3 MWRAW-EDISON GALLEON LED WWW.fanek.COm TOMCUBES 4 4A00 SQ FT. 2 FLOORS DECORATIVE b' MAN WRNEIKA b AfffRLIDC TOUNHOUSES 3 3040 SQ FT. IFLOOR POLE LGNf ENTRY STREET IUS TOUme 1•3060 SQ FT. I FLOOR TOUNNOUSES 1-2,440 S2". I FLOOR TOTAL 170,00 S2 FT. 2SA% -J Liberty Crossing ✓ Medicine Lake Road and RHODE ISLAND AVENUE NORTH Wlnnetka Ave.N. (STREET TO BE MODIFIED OR ELIMNATEO,BY TILE CITY) / Golden Valley,MN ___________________-{y-_—__--_ 5 _ --__—_---_—______ \ (/SWILL EXISTNG NEW Tw CITY 0T i— --------------------- -- __ __ 1 I /�/ I DRIYEW4T ENTRY TIE CITY ! i ___________________ —_ J, --- '{�-11111 / !! F �_.___=_cY_=—_ _____________ kyr — ___F'fxJPERtT Lie _ _ _ _ 17 / Tw BY TSE CRY _ —__ _—__—__ — III -- ---- To-- - - _ — , per I s -_— —_—_—__- —___—____---------- - ,, ------_--_---__-— — _ _�!—— — — — — —— — — — — — �� ---—— / --------,�` - _--_— ►a ��LLL\ I I ( I I Intuitive P _ J i I I i 6-STORY ANE N &11LDMCa 0 Investmer ts,LLC (INCLUDES ONE LEVELOF uro Er� WD PARKNG) - 7'-eTOW al►uau3E8 MN I II III \ \ I Y I dwangmeer \\K I I I i I BUIILLDRRG I I Rehder and W P- i i II I �\ ` \,\� 1 1 1 1 1 1 r - - - T - -- I Associates I l i l l I I VIII I MAY AREA/ I PM_FLN I� I Eagan,3440 IN 551 Drive,Suite 110 I I I I am I Eagan,MN 55122 Q II I II y 7 I I I I I I ( I -STORY1 (651)452-5051 1 1 I III I DROP-oTs ( I T' aEs I b670RY 7-STORY 2-STORY 7.67081• FIL7�11',AyT�ION I I I Q I I II iou►bIOIBEa TOUR410l 704"OuSE$ 70LLWIOIIBEb `I.I l f' I lal I I %STALLS I I — 1I I Ili\\ \\I C11t7PIC/1BE)FlTNESS I I Q III \ 1 1 1 A 1 _ I Q I A\ , ,A z X 11 I I T 1 s°Bwau�Es I 111 I I ST 2 STALLS I I I ) SUILDN0 SETBAOKL ---- --- - - ----- -- Wa "c t 1 ne.an :eddy m0% p. `I DA81ED LRE RlflIOA1E6 EXTENT / N 4D'TTN RdDNB \ OF IlL7EIXAX71fd2 PAAKMG I spedfiouc u Eer .1-- y r reree a— yp duly1d—ft- mi erpdaerer aaM MMnmwle d� D I S7 T oro =te of mr .rota I-STORY I I I I I \ \ TOLLNHQ1sEs EXISTRG DAIRY OMEN II I papa dare I I EXISTING WALGREEN9 1 1 I I 2 TORY T a 2 I dR1"T S I 2 TORT S �• I I 7dapea num• G9naNre U J o I I \/ / )-STORY I I 1 I I I /\ _ j\ TOd7JHO YJEs I scale 1"=40'-0" i nam ns/er 2 TORY T Is 7 1 KIR1"T S I/ 2 TL I ORT I I I I �,-S• �0�,I � L 01 TISACK LN 6 SpEBALK RFILL EXISTRG MODIFY EXIST NEI)DRIVk1W7J DRIVEWAY ENTRY POVEWAY ENTRY ENTRY preliminary PUD appl. 3.12.15 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH architecturalsite plan CE V EF .,•'J NORTH REAR A010 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN cppydgM Tanek 2015 y�M a -ovosm LMDEROROIs-0D sroRAt TAWS(By CITY) RHODE ISLAND AVENUE NORTH';— SIA _ A ry ..ry —. y i O a. l PROPOSEDCONVEYANI ' —i SWALE.I LSY GTYI I 1 a m9.0 9,0.5 BI03 e9eB � S 'Cj ��_I. I I PROPOSED APARTMENT BLDG n F ) w k I' - w>., I 1 GAR. LLE=897.0 µ4 .-. 0021 _ -_-_- :TOP OF GARAGE ROOF SLAB 907.33 PoBo p = 9' NON BSS INCED • ►- a - - - � — — — _T roP 7 GI 1 .I &z p NDOT CATEGORY 6 Y tl ng. . - a PERMANENT EC BLANKET F- -PRE-TREATMENT Z C �3 !– � o of I Po).a F ct oayQa d i p = BASIN PROPOSED CLUBHOUSE I! FFE 909.7 I = C o o..2$ I I, 9ws Bw.e... wBs a z•• 5 I g,F CQg (( n' EE- [SG �.: )_ . wC0• •b 003.9 TOP 110430 TOP 905.411 J BOBS — p..., - - - { a9ss • TOP°911 so Pox0 .. 90s3 �., B — — — — 9ra5 903.8 W F BJ . ] . . • •008.9 •MN 5 :. •. Pogo • �n TROP=aoi.a a0e.a 13 ce K t M TOP M70 r U TOP0.x 900 S III rr l _ ._ 1 � p).0 14 • &•t yp 00].6 Bf9B - •.•-, It k' .,� V.: .�,A�r,, , � .,.vF -r,e.•, :.� +' B11x� TH._TH TH ••''.. .. , '. ' ". _ %h 1 ,r. 9,03 z I I I TH TH TH TH TH TH TH TH , D& I.f FFE=9111.50 FFE 910.75 FFE=911.25 FFE 11.50 FFE= 12.00 FFE= 12.25 FFE 912.50 909.4 9,0. • 6 ' I il' E ��' ----- --- ---- ---------- •B,9 ------------- - 3: "ell- 3( 1 e 7x aaa = t- Par•c n .:. c c I rRxv<acsi A,.yre:z.O i).0 Ir c m TH TH JTH TH' ' TH TH TH TH TH TH TH TH TH � FFE=sloso FFE_X11.25 FFE 911.50 2. FFE 1 5 FF 912.50 r� FFE 91 00 F=– xx; 'a —_ M \ . •a,— _ �__ -- MNNETKAAVL�INUE: NORTH �a ' _.4 ---53— 5=� „ pro_ ! -- — 5 _ _ —_ — 3 — v —1 —I _j J - �- — a o ,rte — -� ¢how Q O U GRADING NOTES INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE LEGEND C) o t1l–All elevations shown are to final surfaces. – The site must be inspected once every seven (7) days during active construction and within 24 hours PROPOSED CB/MANHOLE BOUNDARY/ROW/BLOCK UNE Z Z Q' 0 2�– Contractor is responsible for obtaining o Notional Pollutant Discharge Elimination System alter a rainfall event greater than 0.5 inches in 24 hours. L1J (NPDES)General Storm Water Permit for Construction Activity before construction begins. – All inspections and maintenance conducted must be recorded in writing and records retained with the SWPPP. 0 PROPOSED CATCH BASIN ––––– EASEMENT �m –Areas of the site that have undergone final stabilization, may hove the inspection of these areas reduced � PROPOSED HYDRANT ------------ LOT UNE D)– J to once per month, —�—� O EROSION CONTROL NOTES -Al silt fence must be repaired, replaced, or supplemented within 24 hours when they become nonfunctional PROPOSED GATE VALVE BUILDING/PARKING SETBACK UNE t2o W U or the sediment reaches 1/3 of the height of the fence. .4 PROPOSED FLARED END —w—EXISTING WATERMNN o 20 40 Bo Contractor is responsible for all notifications and inspections required by General Storm Water Permit. – Temporary and permanent sedimentation basins must be drained and the sediment removed when the depth Q- iiia All erosion control measures shown shall be installed prior to grading operations and maintained of the sediment reaches 1/2 the storage volume. Removal must be completed within 72 hours of discovery. ��!~ PROPOSED STORM SEWER —5—EXISTING SANRARY SEWER SCOIa in feet until all areas disturbed have been restored. – Surface waters and conveyance systems must be inspected for evidence of sediment being deposited. Removal DRAINAGE ARROW —ST—EXISTING STORM SEWER 0– Sweep PROPOSED CONCREFE paved public streets as necessary where construction sediment has been deposited. and stabilization must take place within seven (7)days of discovery unless precluded by legal, regulatory, or —G—EXISTING BURIED GAS UNE Q– Each area disturbed by construction shall be restored per the specifications within 7 days after physical access constraints. E the construction activity in that portion of the site has temporarily or permanently ceased. – Construction site vehicle exit locations must have sediment removed from off–site paved surfaces within PROPOSED STD.DUTY BITUMINOUS E—EXISTING BURIED ELECTRIC UNE SQ– Temporary soil stockpiles must hove silt fence around them and cannot be placed in surface waters, 24 hours of discovery. PROPOSED CONTOUR T—EXISTING BURIED TELEPHONE UNE SHEET NUMBER –� including storm water conveyances such as curb and gutter systems, or conduits and ditches. POLLUTION PREVENTION MANAGEMENT -498) PROPOSED ELEVATION —sao— EXISTING CONTOUR Boundary k Topographical information information was prepare y ©–All pipe outlets must be provided with temporary or permanent energy dissipation within 24 hours Egon, Field&Nowak, Inc. This information has not C of connection to o surface water. • – All solid waste must be disposed of off–site per the MPGA disposal requirements. —�—SILT FENCE x 9e5.50 EXISTING ELEVATION been verified as to its accuracy or completeness by 0– Excess concrete/water from concrete trucks shall be disposed of in portable washout –All hazardous waste must properly stored with restricted access storage areas to prevent vandalism. •• INLET PROTECTION DEVICE Storage and disposal of hazardous waste must be in compliance with MPGA Regulations. �t --i1 yT -� _ .. � ... DE ISLAND AVENUE NORTHRHO , i ROPOSED UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS(BY gTYI __ ( ) - Cp151R11CT MH OVER IX 16 STORY SEWER I � sBr -_. __ -- - __» -- - _- sraRY sEwER -j- -»- •__ -_--_ -_. ov Po _ - __ n� `"'ct = cE I I �.=V i -- ..., ., ;. .. .(Br•aa� __ _..._ _ s .. ��._' O d We � s " s ' _ _ _ _ _ -. - - PROPOSED CONVEYANCE SWALE(BY CITY) �J] PROPOSED APARTMENT BLDG wa = E 911.0 5 sPHRARr uwca sExe --- g F- U OO 'I' 1• NIaJ M111 M HEADER GAR..LLE=897.0 d` W I �(I I I z,'-fII'NOPE•o.ox 70P OF GARAGE ROOF SLAB= 907.33 5 W1TER sEmKE ws I a "I $ --- --- n - I I - GFS- I a c F- !-^ F- 1 I� -YR H N BASIN - - 1 m � •1 100-YR wl=904.0 CB = 1 F- F- 1 I OP 906.0 IIxI I I I ll in $„ u nq b b i�) O ) 1-• m ^� F F c, m f- PRE-TREATMENT BASIN I rE u NV 900.0 PROPOSED • f -f5 MOPE•0.6,x J6 -,�HDPE•a.] CLUBHOUSE ( , _ s§0 0 FFE= 909.7 I °_ E uC P • o'-5 Rc•zmx CBJ f b 3 .E°« TOP vaso TOP v05.IIo b I- A J tB]'- VC.OA]x RN 900.60 INV 900.40 j ---------- 3n -__ p 4 ' k YH 101 3JS'• DW B YH 1 E INTO IX.YN TO^905.85 , -� TOP 90130 IaP 905.3 • MID E • Vf h 8923 x!V 896.0 II!HOPE•a.]1x - .. F.. I .>± n I 1 W Hal 5Z H1°a { CB 3 93--III•LIME•a.4IIx W4*. 191'•1C HDPE•OTtx •YH 3 a y r roP 9oze mP vae.lo raP voe.00 w 901 w ( ? ^ s 4 / 9r 900.so 9!900.Po 9ry 901.30 e n F ' 9+ 0 b a - C -ss SIX vA-t-"F. ,x -1 , I -r ne 'i . TH TH TH TH TH TH TH TH TH TH TH TH TH TH g; FFE=910.50 FFE=910.75 FFE=911.25 FFE= 11.50 FFE= 12.00 FFE= 12.25 FFE 912.50 I,-I rav mo H,03 11 < 9rV 904.0TOP 910.1 105 9N 900.0 tOP 910.J G RC•_ 001.0 C -- -B -•0.10- 1II II A � I D � i l; r 5�.ours 1&rBERs.� J•RO^EFS/ DR 2 Y,nNfrHn TH TH TH TH TH TH �J I . TH TH TH TH TH TH TH TH 101 FFE=910.50 ! Ijil f�. L_ j FFE=910.50 FFE=910.75 FFE=911.25 FFE=911.50 FFE=912.00 FFE= 12.25 FFE=912.50 ..•n'9°oos - c, FS•• xs - --:rz:z �4/tNNKl1/�Nr �DI?TK --- - rt R Q V)Z ,� J- - - - - - - - - - - - o UJ o UTILITY NOTES -1 O7 -All sewer services to extend to 0 point 5'from proposed building. LEGEND j W LL- Bring lBring water main into proposed building and cap at the floor. _.- 3 - Verify all service locations and inverts with mechanical engineer before construction. PROPOSED CB/MANHOLE EASEMERI'/ROW/BLOCK LINE m O-All watermain to have a minimum of 7.5'of cover. 0 PROPOSED CATCH BASIN - EASEMENT �-Z-� _-1}" O5 - Sanitary sewer services shall be 4" (SDR 26) PVC pipe at 2.OR minimum grade. 4- PROPOSED WDRANT ------------- LOT LINE ©- Water services shall be 1" Type K Copper. •• ��VALVE --- BUILDING/PARKING SETBACK LINE 0 20 40 120 U O7 - Contractor is responsible for trench design and O.S.HA. Requirements. eO- Provide o minimum of 18' of separation for all water main crossings / PROPOSED FLARED END -w EXISTING WATERMAIN Scale in Feet with son itory sewer and storm sewer. -►►- PROPOSED STORM SEWER S EXISTING SAN17ARY SEWER O9 - Connect to existing B" water main per City requirements. to - Construct manhole over existing sanitary sewer per City requirements. ---- PROPOSED SERVICE -ST-EXISTING STORM SEWER --*-- PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER -G-EXISTING BURIED GAS UNE �- PROPOSED WATER MAIN -E-EXISTING BURIED ELECTRIC LINE SHEET NUMBER PROPOSED CONCRETE -T EXISTING BURIED TELEPHONE LINE Boundary&Topographical information was prepared by Q Egan, Field&Nowak, Inc. This information has not Q PROPOSED STD. DUTY BITUMINOUS been vefried asiatesits accuracy or completeness by oNo N HARD SURFACE �I � io N SUPPORT POST ROAD Posy o a•O.C. so. Sw1we APPROVED AKSILT FENCE FABRIC FASTEN TO STAKES S 2'O.C. \ Y3 Q OPENING FOR TARGE EVENTS Cj a E FILTER FABRIC HDPE INSERT BASKETS SHOWN WIOUT F[LTER BAGS PERFORATED WALL - `ti. 100 MICRON FILTER BAGS = I Q p W c �" .."roti' REQUIRED INSIDE BASKETS t' p h COMPACTED BACKFILL SKY FABRIC TO OVER FILTER FABRIC b \ fJ WRAPPED MOUND C O �G SCS IF NEEDED HDPE INSERT BASKETS 1 SIIOVN V,.UT FILTER BAGS 100 MICRON FILTER BAGS N N FLOW 50' CATCH BASIN REQUIRED INSIDE BASKETS 1.5 CLEAR ROCK TOP STEW CROSS SECTION VIEW 1�----10' i `+yt. 2X3 HDPE FRAME INS _ s I. 2%3 HOPE FRAME INSERT MERGENCY 01 w v i 2 NOTE: USE THIS TYPE OF INLET PROTECTION OVERFLOW PORTS EMERGENCY OVERFLOW PORT G. U BEFORE THE CASTING IS INSTALLED. W NOTE: USE THIS TYPE OF INLET PROTECTION AFTER THE CASTING IS INSTALLED. a INLET PROTECTION INLET PROTECTION SILT FENCE Z ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 3 INFRASAFE OR EQUAL 4 INFRASAFE OR EQUAL r � No SCALE C Z C3 NO SCALE C3 NO SCALE G`3 J NO SCALE � c Bim MIN.2 C.Y.CLASS J RIP RAP p PAVEMENT = 1/1-X 1-MT BAR Q, Z FINISHED GRADE RIPRAP REQUIREMENTS (ROLLED 70 PROVIDE W fACE OF CURB PROVIDE 4-1/Y SS ANC HO OUTER RING) Icy O C BASE TOOLED CONTROL JOINT o 5'MAX. PIPE OLA.[inj RIPRAP ICY) BOLTS W/CUP$ UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE 12 /.J 1- c.o p R=Y I— _I R=0.5 APPROVED JOINT SEALANT 21 2.2 R`Y Jt 27 J.5 B 1-1/C'F CONCRE E 3/4-CHAMFER 33 42 5.0 9- ea 41 075/Fi in {• �� IS 62 ry L_ CLPASSS B t�m Y r — 1 4B { o+ro.c MucH w r a E co r - ^ 3/4- 54 11.9 5. (PROVIDE$J-1/4-X 3-1{- OT DIPPED GALVANIZED =, 60 13.8 OPENING) GRATE IN 2 SECTIONS (ONE CUBIC YARD IS u A O u� APPROXIMATELY 2,600 LBS.) *;giiI2 a.. CLASSRIPRAPE 4--SAND BASE Ab1EGRANULAR FILTER REWIRED COMPACTED SUBDAADE UNDER RIP RAP OR ONE17 8LAYER OF]OOX MIPAFI .5'FILTER BLANKET OR 2 LAYERS 5- 20• 1/2-PRE-FORMED EXPANSION JOINT -- ' FABRIC OR EQUAL OF 50OX MIRAFI FABRIC OR EQUAL JD'OC MAXIMUM OR AS OTHERWISE REQUIRED UNDER RIPRAP OUTLET PIPE 'I n Nate:Whero conloun indirnte ign0ro 0.]S/it slope ineioaeetl meow< SHOWN ON PIANS. ALSO INSTALL GRANUUVt FILTER(MNWT J601.2B) n and match vejeining pavement 910Pe t0 prevent gutter from'ponding". WHERE WALK ABUTS FIXED OBJECTS. crrTION A-A CEOTEXTB.E FILTER TYPE III In E CONCRETE SIDEWALK S BASIN OVERFLOW /9+ CONTROL STRCUTURE Jr B612 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER 7 RIPRAP DETAIL No SCALE \i3 NO SCALE C Z NO SCALE G'3 NO SCALE G`3 NO SCALE C3 J PROPOSED APARTMENT BUtt01N IB' 10' 43' IS' IN PE=911.0 CONCRETE WAIX 24'OF flL1ER LIEOM SOD 0 0 JOX CLEVI CONSIRUCIK#I SWO y 907.0 (AApIN M-B/Arn DOX ORGWK:LFA,COMPOST ` -1 (MNDOT O 2) 1 �D I.MIN.COYER OVER STORAGESTORAGE TANK:- lER FMRC. TER fMRIC _ .�..... 900.0 - 98.0 GM. 897.0 UNDERGROUND VOR(,T� - - 88].JJ I I 894.0 PROPOSED Y WATER MANN SLOTTED SINGLE WALL HOPE WITH .-CIRCULAR KNIT POLYMERIC flLMENT FILTER - SOCK PER ASTM 06]0]-01. COWTSE FLIER ACCREFATE 3149.24 (MNOOT 37M TYPE I SEWN SEAM NOH-WOVEN FABRIC SHALL NOT BE USED.) O RIPRAP DETAIL C3 NO SCALE C�J Z N CL 0 WLLJ (n U J O 0 Lij LL_ � pp0 J}. U SHEET NUMBER C3 0MO'Z90£SIZ *31U ONIMVLO ZSO'£SIZ-till :'ON 133POSd 'oN '6-N lIsom r-Pq-(n}u,:pewa.este-a,rlss:zea s-asi--lss ge nosauulw �(-�TV1�u Wast n.�¢� 0[[aung'anu(j e.apa,4 pyy6 alba .l3llb'� N3410O 30 .1110 z SJOL, .ng pua'j pun s.auunjd'slaau&ug j[nlj �� 3 }0 3S 43}o 6-1 s43 sl-tl-£ lvlunens and ONISS080 .11213911 � (� •aul sa nz�oss ca a / 3 a }o'd pPsuaarl Plnp o WU Sl-tt-t r.unens and NYId N011VA83S38d 33211 = v :y 1'yl u p.-du eo':�odss,aaq '`�.aao"q a W onss a P I 43 3043 PN 4 4 1 P 1 a oa E.u a ;Eo I I c o 41 I r I I I• o =- Hl H1 Hl H1 Hl U ll.l 1 Hl H1 I 00-406=3--U 00'80 =33! 00'01 -33! 0071 =333��"�., 00'116-33! o' I. I mWa� I x I+ i k x I Rx _. F- -I- - �I ~ � c4, — LU I N = N X W� � I I O a I I yam N � � I m n I n I Z I I Ig F W _ v tico or a CL Q� ,r 10 cc I � CL O I 2 I Ia I I I xLu � I � o a a Q T a ....................... : x 2 i ' o ' Q 9cs.:.o EQEf H1 H1 H1 H1 H1 H1 lW" �� I' OS'L06=3!i SZ'LO6=3!! Y10'LO6=3if I I I YjYY4x AAAkA�YSAAYY Yf 1A,i ilYd�.x I� m 3J3 00'[06=33! I • Hl H.L Hl Hl Hl Hl .. ... ..,. . �� I> • � azSea3��A��aaRa e`5' ,€ya_aaa Y a�Ail ,2ei,a 1 L.� '� I� Hl Hl Hl Hl Hl Hl _'—'— I I m OS'LOB=33! SZ'LO6 3d! 00'[06=33d r.—. -—-—-— .— I m i� I ,x.x.aasaaaaaasa�c:.aY sA".a;xsxaaYY:. n in W cy Sb€ S56& b !€ 3 a1 I OS'LOs=3!! SZ',(06 3!3 00'[06=33j tl-I aH1 H1 _H1 to � Hl'' H1 H1 ....... - � a r - 77 I Od021 3Nd7 3NIOI03N i ' � . � —. .. .. —\ '_ -•---•aaaa aaAaA sa:acaa Aaa as:,xa A:s,Asa::::srs:sA:: Luminaire Schedule Symbol Qt Label Arrangement Total Lam Lumens LLF Descri tion Lum.Watts 16 A SINGLE N.A. 0.900 MCGRAW GLEON-AE-02-LED-El-SL3 MOUNT AT 16FT 10500 LUMENS 107 1 Al SINGLE N.A. 0.900 1 MCG RAW GLEON-AE-03-LED-EI-SL4 MOUNT AT 161-1,14886 LUMENS 157 2 Bi SINGLE N.A. 0.900 MCGRAW GLEON-AE-06-LED-El-SL4 MOUNT AT 24F 1.29163 LUMENS 315 1 B3 SINGLE N.A. 0.900 MCGRAW GLEON-AE-06-LED-EI-SL3 MOUNT AT 241-1 30693 LUMENS 315 ® g C SINGLE 4580 0.900 1 AMERLUX DC216/HLE-T4-4VL MOUNT AT 1 SFT 4546 LUMENS 58 U Calculation Summary Label CalcType Units Avg Max Min Avg/Min Max/Min PROPERTY LINE Illuminance Fc 0.05 0.7 0.0 N.A. N.A. SITE GROUND Illuminance Fc 1.69 10.8 0.0 N.A. N.A. ENTRY ROAD Illuminance Fc 1.45 2.8 0.5 12.90 5.60 ' LEFT ROADWAY Illuminance Fc 1.97 4.9 0.4 4.93 12.25 PARKING LOT Illuminance Fc 2.37 6.1 0.5 4.74 12.20 RIGHT ROADWAY Illuminance Fc 2.47 8.9 0.5 4.94 17.80 Luminaire Location Summary LumNd Label X Y Z Orient Tilt 24 A -1024.9 283.8 16 270 0 25 A -918.7 284.2 16 270 0 26 A -815.2 283.5 16 270 0 P7 A -702.6 282.6 16 270 0 28 A -885.4 461.8 16 90 0 E 29 Al -595.8 248.6 16 236.993 0 e 30 A -529 231.8 16 270 0 35 A -129.2 367.3 16 0 0 36 A -130.3 453.7 16 0 0 °7 37 A -130.8 280.2 16 0 0 38 A -131.2 193.9 16 0 0 39 A -186.1 232.9 16 270 0 40 A 284.9 232.9 16 270 0 Revisions 44 A -131.1 114.3 16 0 0 48 A -130.6 43.8 16 10 0 ----- -�----- - --- 49 C 24.9 i 6 180 0 - ---------- ----- -3 . 52 C 368.2 68.7 16 0 0 53 C -331.3 117 16 180 0 54 C 368.7 159 16 0 0 55 C -368.3 248 16 0 0 (I 56 C -331.9 191.5 16 180 0 57 A -618.1 152.5 16 180 58 61 -389.4 293.1 24 0 59 B1 -425.1 292.9 24 180.327 0 I I -__ "; z p 61 B3 412.1 351.6 24 90 0 �I p I r ®• • I o LU W 62 A 419.3 232.5 16 270 0 M I I „: 1 NN a M ~ °z Cn ,.�.� ....................... '�;:I� : ,.,..... ,., :,.,.,.,.,...,...,.,.......,.,..... III. U ''^^ GENERAL NOTES: V J A.PULSE PRODUCTS DOES NOT ASSUME RESPONSIBILITY t' o `• O FOR THE INTERPRETATION OF THIS CALCULATION OR I i II II rr COMPLAINCE TO THE LOCAL,STATE,OR FEDERAL LIGHTNG CODES OR ORDINANCES. B. U LIGHTING LAYOUT IS NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION I I - - -- -- - -- - - DOCUMENTS BUT ONLY TO ILLUSTRATE THE PERFORMANCE - - -- - - -- OF THE PRODUCT. M L.L C.ALL READINGS/CALCULATIONS SHOWN ARE SHOWN ON OBJECTS/SURFACES. M W J Plan View Scale:1 inch=60 Ft. PAGE 1 OF 1 PEAR 12 2015 r MAI? g ILI tf , a { l pit' LLAI Imagery is intended to provide a representation of the general design aesthetic intended for Liberty Crossing. i Apartments and townhouses will have similar design elements to create a cohesive appearance across the development. MR: 74 - — . il lot Liberty Crossing — ------ —__________----_----- -------- -------- housing elevation examples 3.12.2015 ALTA/ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEY FOR: intuitive Investments, LLC SURVEY ITEMS PER SCHEDULE B: T FlI 6o + x'^d N 1) a Bassin r j•�~ � (RI-5: Strxt zwpra tn.owxtarlyo 33 feet.ops Isoan-c a Nam m th"""e mops.Tn int fw upset p�rvon an on wilmle m ex X. to me vrwerty ma s amiaed on the c.wy ITEM 6: Terme ma smmalbna of prlwt.amaawby mxmmt p.oNdencetl by Dowmxt No,128]516,u vele "`�'-:+ Y- , s z z s roadway ea ml cpnlo nee n d 0ocumenl a facts the P perly and a dap-d m the a r..y. w: N •'-^a w 11.,wf"�-Il�i8EC.TI; = MTA,�0• _sro'--aT--ae-----r✓• r-.A=a. \.`ear \ r°•P a.-M - a* -.RH�O+De.E • _'soh.NO_VOw"��J'rSi pER,'o1rt-0/w82•3<r^,Ic1^-'rm-�in=+i(N"-`_,`-C1.M�•.'��...'r}"�•n�. -_•^"°'�pi•"'�irp.._�a'-- -�= e_-r_r.rFAr _ -ap -_""__-�'O�'_y-'-=tee'x-.opx¢i�-w.=¢ p-.mnB_a+r,nr 4c.�<+_+aeB?wT�I-dtl . 9�w9.ve-s"wxa.Rr-r C. /$ AND AVENUE -NOTR ITEM 5 LLIItr tl dh 9xt(+)nvwfiov6awzll l zof wtl a o wem.x lot.npwn ae, the th.'op nDln deted 1. pl ep rre McTp< - - - ®IIEM 6' Electric/rax Nei II sem t(s) r port of wbjt prommx M roxw o/N«tnem Stetx Powm I,d.pt M Do<vmml Na.D]16591.TM1e Boa ml relerencatl n ae:d dowmml pflectz Ire ,y��Ndi$ / _ wa t a � F=-��=- � � .q �j`�n,-� \)'� oamne:ti•doe s a.wat.e -� I.I1 ,a c�3 ," •nr 1 IX f•I I ITEM] Epaanant f«at,,t,ro a a mity over RNI I.mans A-I.N pdp^Fg-j!.'wa^NIR p . '�`°'- �` r I I.,'/ 4e I'x, �am� J :$ .xN-d by D«4mml Na,fiesta T .a int nferm a m a on 1 / ."��,A�^' '.`F- °• f" 4 4 �. i , , /(P' % light_ D vent or Rn ae eons Avenue M«tnauc-k-d<.MCTAC ADDToN. na is t d.pcwa �w•` t (��II� \� / ,,,{{{ I al pIna surfreY o d documml z embraced WUn the _d° ____ zf ___ _ ___a °_ ___zv4m� - �Mi A b •XXP I I I a" d "1O O d b I EI pern d of b t I•x 9C/aver of N«Uem Stotea Power L 1 I r / I I lll��JJJ - \ r I 8 ITEM& ElecWc tranamiadm IMe t(a) po w Iec prom a m �"I ( •I�1. .II+I >m 1 C T i �,� i. 1 Itil p l ;1 I , '`" `�" �- E I I f I I'' /n '* ".f \ y , I © DDmDmr x wh N t Dowmmt Nweltsooi,t A n tho a me a int rerarmae aea III • . u•,nzA r.m aoMer Mea \, ¢ Haa�.�..rr`n0i dcrAr"n`wmrw�m xe I w �•I d / - ao<4ment wn<h a reale tna property.a aev<ted m Ine a r>ay _ rj '• I sn, F _ ITEM 9: El,,tdl t-nnh Nm III- t o part or wb,.at p;.r^Nn m rower or x«tnem smin Pa.w 7-1 .8 ,FLL,Y' / „ 111 I I ® Campmy':'r M Dorvmml No 18]1588.A over on u the easement releren<ea n sad I• ,i / I i�I i I _ I�11b Napt ^ I l b r t thp epe.tr is a°v<lea.n Ine a rwyh N I. -----I-- vI' iv xa Tx.an FI.Ne 6o6eaT . Ia-.-. f" I n ,iI '>bI 'mJ�"I I ®TTMA& Utility a an 9• ml(a)evn part d wbjed w•ntleea v.an a aW',,h.Gahm vale, 1 E�g��LLp�¢..i� I Ww p-x.mbm Tos,.rhe era nage ane ut Ir exemenl¢dea p.t rad Me I Itl� a �°� / ^� 1 . I9 b I I •c'1 / s` 1\/±` O \ `N 'I I Doer!,ore e.p else an tn.wr.•er w:<n a d I / V I dx/SI/AT_ I - pT 4J 1 , :-r ilEtt fi. Utflit d araMa N Me h a"ym Y ? t las �. nR• �. .I I 't! y.. �' a• }� 3 Plain v>tlan Nab Dva,mml w.f,°m,3zssJ m zaoo,in,.Muvan a e. Qeap� e°,r Twao unm / ' I� .t: w / 3 ); y m y�o�e•el Y a) va dm dee en ' .. .'.' ..t 4`� • I "' p_ I tn0 6m a aro aoNa'n pet now b.m wo t a e oast..not dx ee w 1s� F p" • 3p . p TEM Ti DmWca iranm,nbn Iln.t •n t(.> v«l al wbpct premMx M lava d xo.I il.l. awmd ®1 wwtaa n Dawmmt No 1096151 a.Dat dly relewd by Dowmmt No.199599] ..amt. u..,..y.lm.zs I I. I + _ eO1^vp1�dm a clan m Ine...... ' r�n,A�nxl.y .,.y � ..ea aae.mm:a ad m•pw.rlraa> p fl9k -L' t-4r�:• �•• ••a„ \ bu rsa I!!) �- -r �- 1 ITw 6. sM..w xwnm a)aow^pw of xbM w.nlw n e4dmna by,Dxa�wmml Nv(.).1,6]e54.Tn.t e-Test an I z emerac° : n °rgnl o .ay ocn,a Law Rood awe k no _ alp/rah, w .R a a9l I , i. t STORY BLOCK BUILWNC 'V� I 11'•L __ __�pe�__________ a ITEIA int aahnF9 wbwd w.mi•n pe•MamMdby D°wmml�Na(a)I 1)SY9o02µ1^TtD03 ND.775)MEDICINE LAKE ROAD Pre I ------------- -'-'a"- I _ b me t,it me eceemmis rcroennd a ow ed emb.aa m Me o wo - 'T , veto a - I - (FOOrYRWr AREA=nae.sa n.) r & ,•a I ® d awnpe u na aro na :a • m e The.xemml r.rwmaea n¢aa dpwmmt orN<ts me I • I �, B \ I IINik ¥g ITEtt --boo, a c n a d.ub m law. Ner,Inntem BNI raxnm. __T } A canpmn x lea M Dawmml Noiazsez dd w.aan x m,mga) vert )m vr.mian b - -' � � ¢xa n ~� yxq�y� propnty vna-a aro ctea on Me aarxey. d __ _ aoa �. - +•, 4 I -e rove rR Mer l I F :-.{ --- , - db" aoaa and.not re ea en mew m e temp c>Ygl iw x eMeme.d brn9opmmf M 2vxx]. 1. S _t I._.. k 1 %yFrom`e,Doc.vo T'u# j ,b b".,. I a , j� / -A_ • ,'I�y� yy:, nEM„ sl...l°menalntY x..nmla.)coot part bra 9maw'eo w cod 9 ) Lal,. '`. " �` a T� .To) mss. gE - dl q„ $pa 1. d �4.$ a, p a ml°e•t.Dina oh a r 1.eohlaM•a o Ament Eelam l a a detain Mina 24.la n ,� , I '�, I ,r � I R ®NEM 12 RnlHatbns,ea ce ya a ec W __ _ •p_- __ �- '�7 ')/ E +r_ i - - 1 1 S I " 2011,Nea Marco i 2DN. d c toedu wNo y fll.the eoaem r _ sem-, -b - io.2430 YBR/p(BV/LWNG t I $$$q the pop t sasps o a. ND.T4J0 NINNETKA AW.N -I v y one I a, 58.65 w rr) J 0on2'19"Wfef40.0d' c`" ,' a ,I ,.N ti I. dI I 4€ WDRmraREA- /' I'%k ��__a _ `.. 8 d EI =6 - ( I ITEM 5: Utility and drainage exemmt(a)oar purl of abject prvnises ae enorr�m the recorded got of McTac d `_T50 /1 i -- ® ® Addi Yon Thc arena ane utlTy e-menta aea<ptea n ape wet.w m pned the provoty.a e W a" 9�f I dooi-d m me as a a° i s }N%D2e/9T _ z f e r9ee. <.a $ ITEM 6. svxt.rand ma unNr nsenml w IF9 w in n mpNnn9 Rnoa°mina Aw N n eNdenua by oowme^t No RRI.I.nx memwlalN.a m Meof aCw116ea 1.oruN.rU°one n emnni 1.11-d mam..id e yuaoecym.nl aro emMa Ie q lwOL j A'w I 1 (Y y r� I'.,�G�aul II b, ( -- p I 1 4L ®nEM T: T.rm.andgm.atwn.of pnwt.araodwar.oaem.nl I, b,by Dowmml No 128751 Ine p Pxmrr a-.r z Dins 1 I rooewar eaaemmt rontanea'n as a m<umenl orr.<ls me p.ovwtr ane:a eepmled an Me as eey.riV i 1`I:$ n t p6 ,j N �g ��Yv l•"I I I� a °N � x �- /� � � � as"� IRA i I a b - R to (----jJ- 6I` i I;�t� ` par �I z M I 1e ---- I ae I mR omR /; I �` d I t. ,x , /,.; ,• I LEGEND: .✓ //t I � �� kl n-Ne-:,-z:-Dear `ry `._______; ' / aea cool �a/ -� MANxaE --•-•_ aux FEICE .� -IfY I I I 0. b6 aR+awi 1 { N d e Ar ___I ® 4TµwM MexuaE wWwr Ms � _ - ^I _ ______ -__ ________I N________ __ -_____ __ _ _� ' ( ____--__ _ Y s_ oARr s�ErcR 6vI+cEMUN ! 'x. .p __'L-- __ ,10 ME __ _t____d4 __ _i_ _� �-�a-' _ ___ _�-_____ -_ _ -_ ewe C....eeslN -- ____ ______ -_ _-__- __- _____________ _- -- msPRN.x xliaRY SE"AEF / � D l6R Sr • I $ ` I \ '; m,�k 1, / YI w' I\` �-�I/ L� I IE VTLN: 5 p14 SExER UxDERwWND E-1- 6 ' /• - // --- ver x/ dd0 ER -r- UNOERCRWNO rzLEPxoxE 3 , � _ €€ m ELEcmlc MexxaE 4$••."'• I >e -.Ta ;500921 W Z9:L 00 33 W � \\ �\ \, ) \ A m EI<crac Box -- uNOERCRWxo ws 4z 1200 lose r.. 1 ( - ® xlccmc MErzRr N00712'17T •$ '••iii -`aa- 1 II '"rrnopxe d r ur.°,wA.Y.u�ar're,YE / \, Doc an esi ��._., --r-+ , �-� /�� ® a«DNDIe TREEuxE 8 P x^a 3 usnxc vanox I� wa,wwaax 1.,r.sn ,� .�,r ��38gp36wW pi sfi' 3 Ya um rr pdE �9oz�� cwrWR LxE 1 :E M.. Wr rneE r ww x nm ___�_ a n :a /•z__„ COMMUNIc-Box rREE(o AMErER x Ixa6s) M- 8 MNWs s.mrecE w PARSPACE --TE Ox-L - PIM PAR11C BCPARRS BOLLARD0 R ra GE LEGAL DESCRIPTION: NOTES: ,•____. .•�____ Tt Fti No BO6a5 suoo emened No 11 1. The orientolion of this beam,.,stem is bawd on Me Hennepin County coo dilltl yM(NAD 83-96 Ad}). The West 374 ro t I M No-205 feet of the-h860 feet of the Nwthmet OMDrter of 2. The total aea of the Dropwly dxwlbed herein is 473,209 square Ixt«10.883/sax. the Northwat Ou do o/-tlm 29,Township 115,Ron9e 21,except Me WWat 3J N.t th w(, 3. Tha legd da<rptit.mtl e t 12..int 4: and n Mc Drxwptbn of Nis wrny wine Dane m Me Cemmltmmta t«To. N oc<oding to N•Unllad Slptx Gov. It Survey ther.of,Nm 1I CamµMlnxmta. Mashes i....d by Wwonty Commmclul Tte,Inc.,o.ayint 1«1.dd Republic NotiOnd Ttle Inwnnc.CanpmY,FR.N0.80635. Together Wth m eas•nant ro�InPau and egnu oar the idlowing dxcribed properly.Tha hevinq an effective date of Au9uat 12.2010: No No.84.ha ing I m.Heald"dale of Auqud 28.2014;FIN No.80684,Maung m NwM,,teat of-ti,l Nor t lo' feet of Me South 860 teat of Mot pat or tn•NaMwxt eflxtiw date of September 9.2014:and r9e No.60884,having an s(Imtive dote of FeDruory 4,2015. Duwtn of M.Nwth...t Ouprtm of Sxtlon 29,Townahlp T&Rmge 21,lyng West of the L. No xonng repod a lettm was recNved Tram Me Iowan purwmt to optb d To-&Item 6(b),x.et IorM In Me 2011 O 40 80 120 Ea.l 7 o4 Net Ulermf,e.cpt Ma Wxt 314 Mt of the N-205 INt of Me SouM 860 fnt 01 M.NOMwxI Ouwtm of the NorMwxt Ouortm or Sec11m 29,Tomo 118,Rmq.21,as Minimum Standard Detail R.quirommi+for ALTA/AGSM Lana Tit.Surww. $ spm r dna Da<amme No.za6W1; CERTIFICATION: 5. Th.wxmlY tlaacribea M1meon lin WMir noel ions%(.rex delerminea to be oulaide lM1e 0.2[mood shone.flood plain)per pq, And tagetnn with an easement I«wlwb naaway as evitlenced by Document No.126]518. Federal Inwrance Rale Nop No.2]05]C 0198 E.tlalvd September 2.2008. leo ITE SCALE IN FEET To Intuitive Inwatmentz,LLC.p NNneada limited IiabNity camDmy,Guannly Commmcid T<le.Ine..ontl Old BNnq Regletered lantl a¢la evidmxd DY Certlfiwte of Ttle No.1305]35. 6. ExlsYng utililiea,aervitta ma untlergmnd etrudurx shown herwn were located BIM«phyaicdlY•Fran emNn9 rx«ds mase y p FOUND CAST IRON MONUMENT Republic Nalimd Tte Inauronce C hh'.ny. owileble to ua,by roaNmt tntlmmy,«by Ioca"ma provitletl Dy Gapnm Stale One Coll,per T kat Ne.1426908}y,142690x69; Q 8p FWNO IROV MONUMENT' Thi.is le coli toot foie mop a plat ontl Ine survey m ansa it iv bontl was made in attadmce wIM Me ( t [ - t Inc Fe Ne 60682) 1x R.bl.5;and 150TY00]2.Hewevm.laking_wwbm,Me_act Iocolim of underground fnt....cannot be oomrol.lµawn WAY �_ „o `` SET IFpN MONUMENT MARKED and r05 5;dnictsd. Nnere oetlitio d«mon tleteRed nfermotim. r.quircd.Me dicot•adv sed Mai sxmwtion may be O Nf TI LICENSE NUMBER 41123 2011 Mlnlmum Stmdartl Detpfl Raxiramente la ALTA/AGSM Lmd Tt1a Surveys•joint,edmlWeO and atlaptetl by Lot 1,Blok 1,M<Tac Adaitipn,winding to tna rx«dad plat Maeof,Hennepin Cantµ naery, why N. and serviw may be present and venfiwtim ma-I III d all utNiliea and savicx aoWa be mtamea W ALTA mtl NSP.,and InNudd Rama d 2.3.4,6(b),](a),](bt).&9.11(b).1J.16.1]and 18 of Tode A Minn_ota. 1711,e owner of the r_P."_u<iitn pr'wr le my=ign.panning«excovatien. Dot,of The T ld wok vex completed m Ywch 19,2015. Being Regidered land ea is eM-d by Certifimte If TV'No.88929.. 7. Aa of the data of to wrwy Me property dnwibed hm.on cmlaN.a fetal d 320 vh0bly shoed poking nota of whla Na npa Dale of Rel«Map:Nwk 25.2015 are.1-4o,d.pons.and 12 ae dnignoted hind-.paces. £ ( �.... . rtl..In Flo No 606841 8. Aa of the dot°of thio aumey Mare N no ob-ble evki-or mmmt sato moving work,buidng aanatrvclbn w buAdiny Lot 1.Blok 1,Calder Vdley YFW Peat Numbx 7051,ace«ding to the recorded plat Mwmt etlalims on M.prapmty tlea«ibN hmem. g,_PRI- A�..•R i/R� aOO�mmurr� Hennxin Cmnty,Minnemlo. 9. Aa f Me dote of ld,vera,ontl attmdlny to the Qty of Gddm-y no iniwmotm ma owYode regoang completed o F M,, R. Being Regialered land as N eddmxd by Certirkat<of Ttle No.1]25613. propxed amgea:n aunt rght-ol-way line..Aa of Me tld.of thin w y Mma a roe maawble evitlenn of recent abeal er VICINITY MAP Yinnamto Llomn No.4x123 aId.-construction a rxa;n 1hd.ext Ine property de ib1 nerom. MAR A� O 5 /�-----..r�I-n to nde Inc Fla No 812131 10. Aa of M.date of Mia rwy then N no memvbls evidence Not M.property desmbed nevem is b."g uaea aea.olid waste NOT TO SCALE mN 3 201'1 Lot 2,Blok 1,MGT,.AddNNn,ace«ding to Me recorded plot thanof,Hennepin County, dump,sump or mnitary Imdfil. d Minnxota. 11. Ad'cent pop art d&-mtl porch numban wine obtained from Me Hanxpn County prepedy Nformal'wn Wa site. W rY amen.a Being Regieteraa land as N..denxd by Certlflmle of Tl1e No.12-IiNi 12. BENCHM-Mlnn.mto DeparMmt Dr Trmap«t"'Contrd Moho int-STRASSBURG ANDY. Elewtim 923.73 fxt(NAM)88). PROPERTY ADDRESS: 1229 Tyler Street N£,Suite 100 FIELD BOOK PAGE FIELDWORK REVISIONS SURVEY FOR: INEFN z6ea z9 CHIEF: 7751 MEDICINE LAKE ROAD, Minneapolis.Minnesota 5541 lc N0. DATE DESCRIPTON ALTA/AGSM LAND PHONE:(612)466-3300 FAX:(612)466-3383 DRAWN BV: INTUITIVE INVESTMENTS, LLC 2430&2480 WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH wwW.£PNSURY£Y.CO" KGF GOLDEN VALLEY,MN 55427 Egan,Field b Nowak.Inc. roPmlIN,®2Dt5 6r EG„,non A NOWAx.MG. DRAWING NAME: PMO TITLE SURVEY : ..sere-anq:t6,2 36223.dwg CHECKED SH ET10F1 JOB NO.36223 BY: FILENO. 1113 BRP Preliminary Plat of- LIBERTY CROSSING ,eeavr°R nxaen. -•�w's,�=, � ;er;.,,-- .x•..�-- ,. T., ,---- - -.. --- '----»,raar�e,t�.mune arNrAm ucrAe,na,rcw i --.... ""•. w. 6o FooT wDE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY * g .M. -. @€• ( •-- �� _�-� S O'35"E 1011232x4_ _ S44 '4Y Or 1 .32 02 \J, t _ ` AREAS LOT SQUARE FEET 1 4 4oraxA 12,278 I3 ts� °-r 6w�rx Aurc,n usc.�r Aufr aFn '- � n ~If// ? - \ 67 Ii II &`9I I \•I _ II. I 1II �T 11 I1II 1III JII II e 1/�\�/�/�//ice-_-\\\\ \ \\1 1 4 / I+/I///// / /� ' 36[7 7 2V II II a5 1666000884 1 /A 13 . w 7 7 2 �,z8s 67 � ®\ 1, 6008 60 2 °67 10 1,608 27 12 2, 83 10 67 16713 2,2 la 21 89 N ^ t � rI 15 1x84/ 16 1,660o8 17 1,60s8 £1 gW 67 17 " N / 20 N n2C I �, / -� \�\\ I 4 18 2,278 19 2,278 67 67 �� srzrs eM NOFut- , \ I •_ 20 1,608 `� 21 1,608 STORY..,,BBLOCK ILONJt;"r h-` :118 n 19^✓n 1'1 L / I I // 22 1,608 . 7757/(EDICINE"8 KE ROA -. ' I 1 / _ -��„ya\. PROPERTIES, I I 1 �7 ., (FoorPR..V&i.REA=174 4 50.FT.) 67 / 67) , I IUr r ftvj mr.n I axw 1 �•6Br V \. \ '� i 24 2,278 Owner: \ I 23 1,608 PUBLIC STORAGE ®� I;6 nn tynw.u a Y'*- / / 47 ES INC.IN / C "r" 1 -�)1 / ' 1' 25 2,278 C 7 -. / 1j / / BRICKI 26 1,608 `\ I Iia / 6€ ` II / // NO.22430RKINNETKABAVE.INNO. R {�� g l.. _ _ 28 2,613 R /� L• 1\' (FoorPR/NT AREA=56365 So.FT.) 58'Ta I 29 2,613 ::� ( k �l ,�`/ ) c / C `� ,' ri(::' ,. - u I I / •. / ` 30 1,608 C {O f-' 31 1,608 '- z--_---_ 512 / 1 a C = $1bnOt 32 2,278 C 33 2,278 'SO°03'25*W 140.00 7\` 283.50 8 F / / I ! 3a 1,608 A �. J =.) I dr?_ a e f N09J2'56"E -). _ / I // 57 II 35 1,608 - V 36 1,608 164 47 , y I(I 39 1,608 Owner: \- n q 3 242 1 • 34 24 24 24 24 34 2,278 l; JOHN LOMMEN a 39 - 39 2 24 34 ( ^ r, I f 's 39 2,278 L� (MIDLAND DAIRY QUEEN) _xw u /34 244 , 1 1 / _ +07 40 1,608 I / 9E }_- 41 1,608 1� I42 3@e 37-. 38 b 2 j� a3 1,608 8 rn Owner: rn 2,278 in u) `� 31 a 32 b / 33 u 34-. 35b 44 YCA GOLDEN VALLEY LLC c $ M e 25 a 2@ 27 a Z�> ^ / 6474:1 I SF aE 45 2,278 V x 1 1 11 a1R 04 N S 65 34 `a 46 1,608 �O 24 24 2a 14 rt 3 III .,Gb 47 1,608 34 24 �4 eft- 9 i 4* 24 34 164 5 � Il ° 48 2,613 R, lo242 _ 1 \ ,c•Axrrr 4 47 l}r1 49 2,613 ag I b0 al r 1,608 t 1 C1 i 34 5 1,608 54 1 52 227 47 53 1,2538 12 53 o t16Owner: 39 sJAMES NEUBERGER 44J7 48� 45 6 2,2830 57 2279 279 m a€s`k 48 51 5p° 49 ,-- --- _ 47 � , g 58; 59 4is- 2,80 ri24 60 61 2279 62 1,653 664 130 229 I_ 3 00 .I J S 21 W ,`�0. \\ \\ \\ `�, ,',��c�anav \\ 229 S0902'11 W 00 �E! Rd -AVENUE NORTH-k vnXTSM51 P+f, A°Ae" «uew.r5rrnxnw,rwrxcannrsr 0'j�200 N� `' C[i ' -� ^ wARrm or sra re n1e.ea Arr.n I N 1 rr..ae ' \ t /O as n4. VARIABLE X10 PU RIGNT-oF-W q1�5 O 1 7$ dP $y / 55.>a'SRNI A RfP 55 55 55 A 55 *��S �- O r nssr uVs a we ww1",Nw%.ae.n,rw.ria x¢:r-/ O __ J .v o PROPERTY DESCRIPTION o OW ER/DEVELOPER �pxx E to R°° -" I hereby certify that this preliminary plat was prepared by me or under my direction an Todd Schachtman The West 374 feet s the North 205 feet ex the South est feet et the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Intuitive Investments $ITE � I dE��A of Section 29,Township 118,Range 21,except the West 33 feet thereof,according W the United States E 6o 120 Government Survey thereof,Hennepin County,Minnesota. / 5402 Parkdale Drive Y 0 20 40 Dated this 8th day of April,2015 I Suite 200 t A � Ryp Together with an easement for Ingress and egress over the following described property:The North 30 feet of[he St.Louis Park,Minnesota 55416 I Scale in Feet North 655 fee[of the Sou[n 860 feet of that part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of SeRion 29, REHDER&ASSOCIATES,INC. @.>sF. •• �t '•N Phone:612-817-2395 f 5 feet �•••� �°" WttSB" N. Township 118,Range 21,tying West of the East 704 feet thereof,except the West 374 eet of ti a No Rarth Oge 21, ARCHITECT NOTES of the South 860 feet of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 29, P � ` as shown In deed Document No.2476007: -- AP` 0 8 2015 Tan k,Inc. - °Bearings shown are based on the Hennepin County Coordinate System. Thomas J.Adam,Land Surveyor jib 118 East 26th Street Minnesota License No.43414 1 Minneapolis,Minnesota 55404 g A ,(4 *Topographic,easement and utility Information shown taken from survey provided And together with an easement for prlvatanrtloadway as evidenced by Document No.1287 Phone:612-879-8225 �1� SE by owner. 5 •Contact Gopher State 1 for utility locations before any construction shall begin. Lots 1 and 2,Block 1,MCTac Addition,according to the recorded plat thereof,HenneDln County,Minnesota. ,t J f SURVEYOR/ENGINEER Phone 651454-0002. and Rehder and"," CIOteS, InC. ptYI101/1R A1fNOE *Area:473,292 square feet(10.87 acres). Lot 1,Block 1,Golden Valley VFW Post Number 7051,according to the recorded plat thereof,Hennepin County, CIVIL ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS Rehder&Associates,Inc. •Existing Zoning: Commercial and Light Industrial. Minnesota. Suite 110 �einity Map 3N0 Federcl b'rve Suite 110 Eagan,Minmaoto Phone(651)452-5051 3440 Federal Drive *Proposed Zoning: PUD. Eagan,Minnesota 55122 Section 29, Township 118, Range 21 JOB: 154-2153,054 Phone:651-452-5051 No Scale ,* city 0j I -It 11golden MEMORANDUM valleyPhysical Development Department 763-593-8095 J 763-593-8109(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting May 5, 2015 60 day deadline: May 11, 2015 Agenda Item 4. B. Public Hearing- Ordinance #556 - Rezoning 7751-7775 Medicine Lake Road, 2430 and 2480 Winnetka Avenue North, and 2485 Rhode Island Avenue North, Intuitive Investments, Applicant Prepared By Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager Summary As part of the request for a Planned Unit Development (PUD), Intuitive Investments is also pursuing the rezoning of four properties in the southeast quadrant of the Medicine Lake Road and Winnetka Avenue North intersection. The properties at 7751-7775 Medicine Lake Road, 2480 Winnetka Avenue North, and 2485 Rhode Island Avenue North are currently zoned Commercial. The property at 2430 Winnetka Avenue North is currently zoned Light Industrial. On December 2, 2014, the City Council approved re- designating these properties as High Density Residential on the General Land Use Plan Map. This request was sent to the Metropolitan Council and was approved on April 22, 2015. Under the PUD proposal, the Zoning Map would need to be amended so that all of the properties would be zoned as High Density Residential (R-4), which provides for high density housing of over 12 units per acre. Based on the density of the proposed PUD of 22.7 units per acre, High Density Residential zoning would be the most appropriate designation for this site. This would be consistent with the recently revised land use designation of High Density Residential on the City's General Land Use Plan Map. On April 13, 2015, the Planning Commission recommended approval (6-0) of the rezoning. Attachments • Location Map (1 page) • High Density Residential (R-4) Zoning District Section of City Code (3 pages) • Official Zoning Map (1 page) • Ordinance #556 - Rezoning 7751-7775 Medicine Lake Road, 2480 Winnetka Avenue North, and 2485 Rhode Island Avenue North from Commercial to High Density Residential (R-4) and 2430 Winnetka Avenue North from Light Industrial to High Density Residential (R-4) (2 pages) Recommended Actions Motion to adopt Ordinance #556, Rezoning 7751-7775 Medicine Lake Road, 2480 Winnetka Avenue North, and 2485 Rhode Island Avenue North from Commercial to High Density Residential (R-4) and 2430 Winnetka Avenue North from Light Industrial to High Density Residential (R-4), Intuitive Investments, Applicant. 1aL t — i --�- 16 QuEBEG� > VIT .....................Medicine Lake Rd................................................... ................................................... 550 8179 8139 8101 2550 7825 8181 2575 2222526 2500 8140 8100 8025 4 254Y22252524' 222246 2548--56"751R 8 2;124/5- 25tiU 2558 4.25 2508;10 2 246 Subject Properties: '560 •252506 ' 7 ,,.` +554 2511 2486 2476�a5 25th Ave N 2552 25G, 24, 8159 8101 2480 2485 2500 ,52562 . 2504 2412428 0 2.4 2445 2568 2500 94 �. 2400 24/24182 2424 24002405 2440 2445 a 2450 2 405 > Z 2420 2422 a 2440 1G101J1 > 2400 2380 2385 8040 8020 2425 a, 21 /1011101 >R V 2400 10 319 705 2360 2365 _m 2415 519 719 718 m Jonellen Ln a 80458015 8005 2355 35 2340 2345 t 7979 2409 � 3 -':$- { - ylk i ik yak ' -J"l1 2320 8100 6040 8020 8000 .••'�'•�K-�-'`•�� 315 7980 2337 23 Wynnwood Rd > 8155 8135 8105 8045 8015 2 2320 2325 2315 G > is m :{_ d C v 2300 = 2008180 8140 8100 8040 8020 8000 Z 'S 2300:` > _ Pennsylvania W 23rd Ave N 2301 25 2255 2250 2255 = 2250 7955 7925 U ;� m 7901 78 53 78337831 =� 2220 2225 m 2220 7851` -.i ��,�^�K• -: - '` 4k-."2225 ' ml 2205 9 } 2209 22`02a2200 700 2205 0_2205 220060 - �y{(-c•z#>Vfi�i;z1'ky:y;4; "k-� el ll § 11.24 Section 11.24: High Density Residential Zoning District (R-4) Subdivision 1. Purpose The purpose of the High Density Residential Zoning District (R-4) is to provide for high density housing (over twelve (12) units per acre) along with directly related and complimentary uses. Subdivision 2. District Established Properties shall be established within the R-4 Zoning District in the manner provided for in Section 11.90, Subdivision 3 of this Chapter, and when thus established shall be incorporated in this Section 11.24, Subdivision 2 by an ordinance which makes cross-reference to this Section 11.24 and which shall become a part hereof and of Section 11.10, Subdivision 2 thereof, as fully as if set forth herein. In addition the R-4 Zoning Districts thus established, and/or any subsequent changes to the same which shall be made and established in a similar manner, shall be reflected in the official zoning map of the City as provided in Section 11.11 of this Chapter. Subdivision 3. Permitted Uses The following uses and no others shall be permitted in the R-4 Zoning District: A. Multiple-family dwellings B. Senior and Physical Disability Housing C. Foster Family Homes D. Essential Services, Class I and II E. No more than one (1) kitchen area shall be permitted in each dwelling unit. Subdivision 4. Accessory Structures The following accessory structures and no others shall be permitted in R-4 Zoning Districts: A. Enclosed parking structures similar in construction and materials to the principal structure B. Storage structures similar in construction and material to the principal structure, not exceeding five hundred (500) square feet or ten (10) feet in height. No accessory structure shall be erected in the R-4 Zoning District to exceed a height of one (1) story, which is ten (10) feet from the floor to the top horizontal member of a frame building to which the rafters are fastened, known as the top plate. Golden Valley City Code Page 1 of 3 § 11.24 C. Underground parking structures D. Private indoor and outdoor recreational facilities, including but not limited to swimming pools and tennis courts. Subdivision S. Conditional Uses The following conditional uses may be allowed after review by the Planning Commission and approval by the Council following the standards and procedures set forth in this Chapter: A. Residential facilities serving twenty-five (25) or more persons B. Group Foster Homes Source: Ordinance No. 373, 2nd Series Effective Date: 07-13-07 C. Principal structures in excess of five (5) stories or sixty (60) feet in height. Source: Ordinance No. 444, 2nd Series Effective Date: 08-13-10 D. Retail sales, Class I and II restaurant establishments, and professional offices within principal structures containing twenty (20) or more dwelling units when located upon any minor or major arterial street. Any such sales, establishment or office shall be located only on the ground floor and have direct access to the street. Subdivision 6. Buildable Lots In the R-4 Zoning District a lot of a minimum area of twenty thousand (20,000) square feet shall be required for any principal structure. A minimum lot width of one hundred fifty (150) feet at the front setback line shall be required. Subdivision 7. Corner Visibility All structures in the R-4 Zoning District shall meet the requirements of the corner visibility requirements in Chapter 7 of the City Code. Subdivision S. Easements No structures in the R-4 Zoning District shall be located in dedicated public easements. Subdivision 9. Maximum Coverage by Buildings and Impervious Surfaces Structures, including accessory structures, shall not occupy more than forty-five percent (45%) of the lot area. Total impervious surface on any lot shall not exceed sixty percent (60%) of the lot area. Subdivision 10. Principal Structures — Multiple-Family Multiple-Family Dwellings in R-4 Zoning District shall be governed by the following requirements: Golden Valley City Code Page 2 of 3 § 11.24 A. Setback Requirements. The following structure setbacks shall be required for principal structures in the R-4 Zoning District. 1. Front Setback. The required minimum front setback shall be twenty- five (25) feet from any front property line along a street right-of-way line. 2. Side and Rear Yard Setback. When directly abutting any R-1 Zoning District, the required side and rear yard setback shall be forty (40) feet. In all other instances, the required side and rear yard setback shall be twenty (20) feet. Subdivision 11. Enclosed Parking Structures and other Accessory Uses Enclosed parking structures and accessory uses in the R-4 Zoning District shall be governed by the following requirements: A. Setback requirements. The following structure setbacks shall be required for all enclosed parking structures and other accessory uses in the R-4 Zoning District: 1. Front Setback. The required minimum front setback shall be twenty- five (25) feet from any front property line along a street right-of-way line. 2. Side and Rear Yard Setback. The required minimum side and rear yard setback for enclosed parking structures shall be forty (40) feet when abutting an R-1 Zoning District and twenty (20) feet in all other instances. The required minimum side and rear setback for other accessory uses shall be fifteen (15) feet. B. Location. No enclosed parking structure or accessory use shall be located closer to the front property line than the principal structure or within ten (10) feet of the principal structure. Subdivision 12. Parking Space Reduction Applicants providing sidewalks on all street frontages may pursue the following non-enclosed parking space reduction: A. Underground parking. The provision of one (1) stall of underground parking per unit shall result in a ten percent (10%) reduction in the number of required non-enclosed parking spaces. B. Public Transit. Scheduled public transit route available within one thousand (1,000) feet of the primary entrance accessed by a public sidewalk shall result in a ten percent (10%) reduction in the number of required non- enclosed parking spaces. Source: Ordinance No. 373, 2nd Series Effective Date: 07-13-07 Golden Valley City Code Page 3 of 3 _'��`M"j;�'.!i"I'� d�-"'i`.°_"a.°a_".w^we"'�"•w',_ea aParye»rxg_o8;Raf a'XewO.°ae,v•d,e,»,".a�9„n,q�qwe°,.;e.9,rz;==-..P1ae�aA,. »^°.:e w wr,a.<a»r,wa„Po;a �1-�»�.•W�:"a'p=a a\ \-a s=" i°a�2 aa °r\y_»m,a.s°rs'aIa. __•�-�-se°•`afia-^.+;nyL e-»a®"�a Za°,.�-.-`,<.\m ya�»°M .-,.>.��•.� ^ I, a�:ra•ra,an."^.w-S°e�a°a# d7°.e�.'�._¢_a"•=°mma�, wa.-,,4✓..e„a°,^.eea.,r.E.,. _er r•,,:"3NF�'=”au"•m g_i ia'R�85_t�z__e'w„an�2.0�t�.4dn�»aw^.,b�,F+!�rv.M F_�az „ aa•F,�„.n= w•�°."'-``'� —„,�•,',M^Aw-°`rt'+ s4 IIIl.I I1!i I`Qzw�' City [®Z�s�9 o n�"�ln � F� e,r cDistricts'u old. eU 1 a i i I0 Single Family(R-1)0 i cexeiModerate Density(R-2)ResidentialOficial Zoning Map Medium Density(R-3)Residential High Density(R-4)Residential CITY OF NEW HOPE CITY OF NEW HOPE CITY OF CRYSTAL CITY OF ROBBINSDALE I-394 Mixed Use 6 Subdistrict A Law Rise up to stones O SubdistrictBMd Rise-u toff stores adM�'30� Subject Properties = c s � °amw = SubdistrictC ghRise-uptolostones Z Commercial3sJ Light Industrial Industrial ne Business Professional Offices aa Institutional C; % I- ) u IS 1Ct(churches schools eh) /-2\Sub-District 'hrades museums and colleges, s etc) )etc) l 63 pnae clubs and It (I-3)Sub-District(ruraing home clinics,etc) 74a 4courses.parka playgrounds and -4 Sub-Dstrcefi Theodora bNt6 government offices,etc) naf Park ParR a o (I-5)Sub-District(cmeenes. tc)S (Mels Park&Rec Board) Planned Unit Development(PUD) I-394 overlay Zoning District(Zones AB, IIi�.•I°-:i. =- �;"+' _y. __.R.trerti,•1'w.e.,{arr -.�.sA-`y;£c yF•�,`.+=c_.-,;` as -._:_, "�,'I-_'J_`rY'�taMfoa_ands"�o8sa.,,��e-_,.,,„,e..'y»•Ia"�-,i�yLI-w_^,"•,`inn°•. ^-,+'r•. .,„„."4•-9.w .=.;.o_�<,,°._,.r ea a-_-°-_.�P."'is.r_r`,°=.e •.,; p..d.. .=:."-i4g'^w?ro»�ww"•"°""e:_y"° 5a � " t.-� �!/”,�v/J u/•a/jn-3:\/,..P/°°,_<�/8•`"'/""•/s-/.,/.d..i/„»i/-ai�5-C/-.I a�d+4�s.°.w°�'s-,aa.�-eR.,..e�mt-a+. r xu „°a,a-ate,,,,°rr„__=r„�e•a,_se„^ade.e•o5 naa„_e-.wam,W er»z pZ�rF a� ° t.eoo e z .400 s.` a' X Leu y a, C) Flood !) Flood PlainManagenent Zoning Overlay District Seth 'ORw -The collection of flood!Profiles 41 Flood Zone Profile and Ma”on fie with the city -M .it In tu2 Here n Caunly,kgnnewb aII sdolkii i dated se emoor 2dthe Flood Insurance Rete Ma 0for te Cay it % n/3 E.27053CO214 E 270530332 E, Gden Vleyher 2.200496 705700354 E,dated 5eptm 2705300351 E,27063CO352 E and 2 84 Shoreland Overlay District 51 114 he section on Stwrelana ana eine 25 rosroaw distance fromPtadwtra 59 33 71 ^, ., PontDts 312015 72 38 souc.a MDnes 20151. �aqnCaunyS�Yermpe 70 —" Golden .aloerlayers 28 V Wirth 3.oO o 400 aFaLake Z 4 Approved Am Official zoning Map City Council CommentsOrdinance Number% Ado tion Date akM Visit the Planning Department aCity Hall for alist of amendments approved Brace adop s°j 13 A This is to certify that this is the Official Zoning Map referred to in Section 11.11 ORDINANCE NO.271,2ND SERIES tw Zoning Chapter of the City Code of the City of Golden Valley. of the Adopted this 22nd day of November 2002.j A ni , 67 j r- LINDAR.LOOMIS, MAYOR as t• 0 = j , CRY OF Westwood \ j Si'.LOUIS PARK a - ,°,.w"las, - •. .:_ ^' Lake CITY OF ST.LOUIS PARI: _ '• '' rte.^". " Atte _ c s•fi.al/ 'i. "c"' stDONALD G.TAYLOR, CITY CNa_ LERK -s • _ , p, L r 1. a BrDt1f77' City of Golden Vagey w s s Lake Planning Departmentt 7ano Golden Vaaev Road r 5`. °°°a I:UAapc2oningMay.Pdt ORDINANCE NO. 556, 2ND SERIES AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE Rezoning 7751-7775 Medicine Lake Road, 2430 and 2480 Winnetka Avenue North, and 2485 Rhode Island Avenue North from Commercial and Light Industrial to High Density Residential (R-4) Intuitive Investments, Applicant The City Council for the City of Golden Valley hereby ordains as follows: Section 1. City Code Chapter 11 entitled "Land Use Regulations (Zoning)" is amended in Section 11.10, Subd. 2, by changing the zoning designation of certain tracts of land from Commercial (7751-7775 Medicine Lake Road, 2480 Winnetka Avenue North, and 2485 Rhode Island Avenue North) and Light Industrial (2430 Winnetka Avenue North) to High Density Residential (R-4). Section 2. The tracts of land affected by this ordinance are legally described as: The West 374 feet of the North 205 feet of the South 860 feet of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 29, Township 118, Range 21, except the West 33 feet thereof, according to the United States Government Survey thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Together with an easement for ingress and egress over the following described property: The North 30 feet of the North 655 feet of the South 860 feet of that part of the northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 29, Township 118, Range 21, lying West of the East 704 feet thereof, except the West 374 feet of the North 205 feet of the South 860 feet of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 29, Township 118, Range 21, as shown in deed Document No. 2476007; And together with an easement for private roadway as evidenced by Document No. 1287516. Being Registered land as is evidenced by Certificate of Title No. 1305335. Lot 1, Block 1, McTac Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Being Registered land as is evidenced by Certificate of Title No. 689295. Lot 1, Block 1, Golden Valley VFW Post Number 7051, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Being Registered land as is evidenced by Certificate of Title No. 1325613. Section 3. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99 entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 4. This ordinance shall take effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law. Ordinance No. 556 - continued Adopted by the City Council this 5t" day of May, 2015. /s/Shepard M. Harris Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: /s/Kristine A. Luedke Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk city 0/ valley Physical Development Department 763-593-8095 /763-593-8109(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting May 5, 2015 Agenda Item 4. C. Public Hearing-Amendments to the General Land Use Plan Map - 9000 and 9050 Golden Valley Road Prepared By Emily Goellner, Associate Planner/Grant Writer Summary Various developers have approached the City about the redevelopment opportunities for parcels located along Golden Valley Road within the Highway 55 Redevelopment Area. This area is located north of Highway 55 West between Highway 169 and Boone Avenue north and it is a unique area in Golden Valley that has generated interest from the real estate market for redevelopment. Out of this interest, the City Council directed the Planning Commission to examine the Highway 55 West Redevelopment Area and determine if the existing land use regulations are sufficient to support the Council's vision of the area as a mixed-use and pedestrian-friendly extension of the downtown. With vacancies at two adjacent commercial properties located at 9000 and 9050 Golden Valley Road, there was concern with Council that the potential for auto-oriented uses could prove to be detrimental to this vision. The Planning Commission discussed this topic in February and in April and the Commission recommended that the two properties be guided for high-density residential rather than commercial. At the Council/Manager meeting on March 10, Council discussed an informal proposal for a high density senior residential building at 9000 Golden Valley. Even if this particular development proposal is not approved or completed, Council envisions high density residential uses for 9000 and 9050 Golden Valley Road. Population Growth To evaluate the need for an increase in the amount of land guided for housing in the community, Planning staff has referred to population forecast data provided by the Metropolitan Council in October 2014. According to the data (see attached), by 2040, the total number of households in Golden Valley is expected to increase by 17%from 8,816 households in 2010 to 10,300 households in 2040. The total population is expected to increase to 24,300 people by 2040. To accommodate this growth in population, the City must evaluate the appropriate measures to increase housing opportunities and identify the appropriate areas for growth. For example, the City of Minneapolis plans to accommodate growth by permitting "granny flats" or accessory dwelling units under a specific set of circumstances outlined in their Zoning Code, Many communities have amended comprehensive plans and zoning codes to allow higher density housing and mixed use developments along highly utilized transportation corridors. General Land Use Plan Map Amendment The properties at 9000 and 9050 Golden Valley Road are currently guided for Commercial use. Under the current proposal, the General Land Use Plan Map would be amended so that both properties would be guided as High Density Residential, which accommodates densities of 20 or more units per acre. Any proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment must be sent to the Metropolitan Council for their review and comment. No approval for the proposed development at 9000 Golden Valley Road may be given by the City Council until they have heard from the Metropolitan Council regarding the amendment. The City may review the proposal as long as final action is not taken prior to Metropolitan Council review of the proposed amendment. Attachments • Location Map (1 page) • Highway 55 Redevelopment Area (1 page) • Memo to the Planning Commission dated April 13, 2015 (2 pages) • Planning Commission Minutes dated April 13, 2015 (3 pages) • Comprehensive Plan Table of Land Use Definitions (1 page) • Metropolitan Council Thrive MSP 2040 Forecasts (4 pages) • Email from Helen Liss dated April 9, 2015 (1 page) • General Land Use Plan Map (1 page) • Resolution amending General Land Use Plan Map re-designating the 9000 and 9050 Golden Valley Road from Commercial to High Density Residential (1 page) Recommended Action Motion to adopt Resolution for Amendment to the General Land Use Plan Map Amendment for 9000 and 9050 Golden Valley Road. 835 7i2 • 7.S 696 690 682 680 676 —J640 672• 730 µ. 668 670 • • 701 664 662 660• 1046 658• 101 884C883E683488 06168186190 . Subject Properties 03A103102 Z 9836 4 883 158181••• 622 628632S34i36 640 644 8656 c 626 630 638 642 646 B50 1 2kU44 209 21205 ._..-.... e r �• 2 iA 208 U m 71010 e 1 010" 924012 12 5:i1 7 9 11 9140 8900 8>:45 9300 123 55 9326 9310 12+31.6 q 123455 9050 9000 7 8101 12 010. ° 12 9200 7 9e9210 9110_ 9x9110 600 Golden Valley R—d 9325 91� 9010 8:50 • • • 9300 9130, 922 0 - State tiW Y�° State HwY N° 55 88,5~ Memo11a1 KwY 439 = 440 pts 8951 8945 > Z —433 Q 9031 433 y t 432 9131 > Q rs _ 101 c 424 423 m 424 ,* 9141f; -0201 421 a 9147 3s023� LU 416 800 9105 850 830 800 801 820 > ----]- 710 835 742 747 60 708 6'96 890 882 68o 676 d T4b 620 730 730 ... 664 Tam 662 701 .� 71 201 104B 101 M 190 622 Ito 103102 N 209 ------------ 9240 9140 C 600 x900 8861 601 9300 () 9 9310 9200 9050 9000 8806 9210 9110 600 iiy'.vrt 8885 y,7,1F� v 100 Io 8950 9300 9130 i 9220 i 4 rat' - IJV 4"��" �" s".r c 8 39 ; 440 , R Demo .., 6951 O1v 433 1! 5' 9031 433 ` 432 8811 424 423 424 421 >3 V 416 347 410 8928 8920 8912 415 408 346 9201 339 C: 400 893 892 17 13 8809 8901 325 9745 ,� Highway 55 West Sawa" _ °"'K,°.�,z Redevelopment Project Area ,� CitvQ a 41 Vldenl!a Il Physical Development Department artment Y P P 763-593-8095 1763-593-8109(fax) Date: April 13, 2015 To: Golden Valley Planning Commission From: Emily Goellner, Associate Planner/Grant Writer Subject: Informal Public Hearing—Amendments to the General Land Use Plan Map — 9000 and 9050 Golden Valley Road Background The area north of Highway 55 West between Highway 169 and Boone Avenue north is a unique area in Golden Valley that has generated interest from the real estate market for redevelopment. This area, shown on the attached map, is defined as the Highway 55 West Redevelopment Area. Various developers have approached the City about the redevelopment opportunities for parcels located particularly along Golden Valley Road. Out of this interest, the City Council directed the Planning Commission to examine the Highway 55 West Redevelopment Area and determine if the existing land use regulations are sufficient to support the Council's vision of the area as a mixed-use and pedestrian-friendly extension of the downtown. With vacancies at two adjacent commercial properties located at 9000 and 9050 Golden Valley Road, there was concern with Council that the potential for auto-oriented uses could prove to be detrimental to this vision. The Planning Commission discussed this topic in February and in general, the Commission felt that the commercial zoning on the two properties was appropriate, though they realized this meant that auto-oriented uses could be permitted with a Conditional Use Permit. At the Council/Manager meeting on March 10, Council discussed an informal proposal for a high density senior residential building at 9000 Golden Valley Road for which a developer has a purchase agreement secured. The Council discussed their support for high-density residential at this property as well as at 9050 Golden Valley Road. Council directed staff and the Planning Commission to pursue a Comprehensive Plan amendment to allow High Density Residential at these two properties. Even if this particular development proposal is not approved or completed, Council envisions high density residential uses for 9000 and 9050 Golden Valley Road. Population Growth To evaluate the need for an increase in the amount of land guided for housing in the community, Planning staff has referred to population forecast data provided by the Metropolitan Council in October 2014. According to the data (see attached), by 2040, the total number of households in Golden Valley is expected to increase by 17%from 8,816 households in 2010 to 10,300 households in 2040. The total population is expected to increase to 24,300 people by 2040. To accommodate this growth in population, the City must evaluate the appropriate measures to increase housing opportunities and identify the appropriate areas for growth. For example, the City of Minneapolis plans to accommodate growth by permitting "granny flats" or accessory dwelling units under a specific set of circumstances outlined in their Zoning Code. Many communities have amended comprehensive plans and zoning codes to allow higher density housing and mixed use developments along highly utilized transportation corridors. General Land Use Plan Map Amendment The properties at 9000 and 9050 Golden Valley Road are currently guided for Commercial use. Under the current proposal, the General Land Use Plan Map would be amended so that both properties would be guided as High Density Residential, which accommodates densities of 20 or more units per acre. Any proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment must be sent to the Metropolitan Council for their review and comment. No approval for the proposed development at 9000 Golden Valley Road may be given by the City Council until they have heard from the Metropolitan Council regarding the amendment. The City may review the proposal as long as final action is not taken prior to Metropolitan Council review of the proposed amendment. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the General Land Use Plan Map Amendment re-designating 9000 and 9050 Golden Valley Road from Commercial to High Density Residential. Attachments Location Map (1 page) Highway 55 Redevelopment Area (1 page) Comprehensive Plan Table of Land Use Definitions (1 page) Metropolitan Council Thrive MSP 2040 Forecasts (4 pages) Email from Helen Liss dated April 9, 2015 (1 page) General Land Use Plan Map (1 page) Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission April 13, 2015 Page 11 7. A park dedication fee of $60,100, r 2% of the land value, shall be paid before release of the Final Plat. A traffic, pedestrian and safety stu y shall be done as a part of the Final PUD osal. 9. 7elevat e a 'cation will be subject to d ` ign review and approval that w d include ions, terials, and landscap g. 10. s approval is ect to all other tate, federal, and laoaf(ordinances, regulations, or laws with authority`bver,this deve pment. Waldhauser questioned if the recomm ed traffic and safety study should go with this proposal or if the Commission should..se d tter to the City Council saying this area seems to have some issues that should addre d. Segelbaum said the traffic and safety impact is tied to this development. liver said t ally the City will perform the traffic study with the developer posting es row to cover the wsts. Segelbaum said he would like the study tabe limited to the iss es they've discusse MOVED by Wa#fhauser, seconded by Se elbaum and motion carried unanimously to recommen0 pproval of rezoning the prop rties at 7751-7775 Medicine Lake Road, 2480 Winnet< 'Avenue North, and 2485 Rhode land Avenue North from Commercial to High Dens,f Residential (R-4) and the property t 2430 Winnetka Avenue North from Light In strial to High Density Residential (R-4). 01 4. Informal Public Hearing - General Land Use Plan Map Amendment— 9000 and 9050 Golden Valley Road — CPAM-56 Applicant: City of Golden Valley Addresses: 9000 and 9050 Golden Valley Road Purpose: To change the designation on the General Land Use Plan Map from Commercial to Residential High Density. Goellner stated that the City Council discussed a senior housing proposal at their March 10 Council/Manager meeting and have directed staff to start the General Land Use Plan Map amendment process to re-guide the vacant properties located at 9000 and 9050 Golden Valley Road from Commercial to High Density Residential. She referred to a site map and stated that these two properties are located in the Highway 55 Redevelopment Area. She explained that the Metropolitan Council has said that the number of households in Golden Valley is expected to increase 17% by the year 2040 and that the population is expected to be 24,300 by 2040. To accommodate this growth, the City is considering increasing housing density in appropriate locations. Kluchka asked if the property to the west at 9110 Golden Valley Road is designated Medium Density. Goellner said yes. Kluchka asked if there is future development planned for that property. Zimmerman said the City has some interest in seeing that property redeveloped, but there is not an interested seller at this point. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission April 13, 2015 Page 12 Segelbaum stated that there has been discussion regarding the Highway 55 intersection as part of previous proposals. He asked if re-designating these properties to High Density Residential would help support some of the initiatives and if that could be used as funding for the TIF district in this area. Kluchka asked if the pedestrian overlay is coming back to a future agenda for discussion. Zimmerman stated that the Council has asked that a pedestrian overlay district be developed potentially for this area, but for use in other areas as well. He stated that there is a redevelopment area over all the parcels in this area. He said there are different types of TIF districts so it depends on what types of developments are located in this area. Segelbaum said he is concerned about the impact to the intersection as it relates to two high density developments. He said he wants to make sure that there is support for improving that intersection. Zimmerman said the City has a concern about safety and that the slip ramp design and improvements will be addressed as part of the Golden Villas project. Kluchka opened the public hearing. Jerad Ducklow 7002 6th Street North, Oakdale, representing the property owner at 9000 Golden Valley Road, said he is a real estate broker and is currently listing this property. He said he has had suitors for this property. One of them happened to be a potential residential property, but there have been others interested as well. He said when he received the hearing notice for this meeting he was rather shocked and the timing of it seems ironic because he has been discussing with the City other potential uses. He said he is not adamantly opposed to the re-designation, he just wants to make sure it is being done for the right reasons. He said he wants everything taken into consideration because when smaller parcels like this are zoned high density residential there are certain limitations. He said he thinks everyone wants this property to be redeveloped and used to its fullest potential, but he questions the timing of this proposal. Seeing and hearing no one else wishing to comment, Kluchka closed the public hearing. Segelbaum asked if the normal requirements regarding notification were followed. Zimmerman said yes. He explained that the City Council asked the Planning Commission to look at this area about a month or two ago to give them some initial feedback about the land uses. He said the Council wanted to pursue high density housing in this area. Baker asked who wants this area to be housing and who wants it to be open to potential commercial uses. Zimmerman said the Council wants these properties to be high density housing. Baker asked what is motivating that desire. Zimmerman said there is some concern as this area transitions to a more pedestrian friendly area that auto oriented uses wouldn't be as friendly to a pedestrian, mixed-use area. Waldhauser said it is hard to envision this area as a pedestrian friendly area. Baker asked if this is the right way to do this. He said he would like to see a mini West End type of project with real mixed-use. He said this feels piecemeal to him. Cera asked what would happen if the Planning Commission recommended denial. Zimmerman said the Council directed staff to bring this to the Commission for review. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission April 13, 2015 Page 13 Segelbaum asked if these properties are buildable as a high density project. Zimmerman stated that the High Density Residential Zoning District allows for 12 units per acre. Segelbaum asked for clarification of how the properties can be used right now. Zimmerman reiterated that if these properties are un-occupied for a period of one year they would be considered non-conforming, but if they are continually being marketed for a commercial use or used as a commercial use, they can continue to be used as commercial properties. Cera questioned if the Medium-High Residential designation would be better. Blum said the Planning Commission has discussed recently where higher density would be appropriate. He said it seems that the intersection of two major roadways is a good place to have growth and density and that is where this is. He said this is also a gateway location where the City might not want underdeveloped, vacant properties. Segelbaum agreed and said he thinks this is a right place for this use. Baker also agreed. Waldhauser asked about the status of Bus Rapid Transit on Highway 55. Zimmerman said there was a study done which indicated this could be a favorable corridor, but there is no funding available at this time. Waldhauser said it would be more exciting to have a mixed use proposal here. Zimmerman noted that the R-3 and R-4 zoning district also allow for first floor retail with a Conditional Use Permit. Baker said he is ok with recommending approval of the proposed re-designation but he really feels it is not getting the City where it wants to go. He said he would like the Council to take the initiative to be more bold than this. Kluchka said historically the Planning Commission has commented on spot zoning without taking into consideration a larger area with a plan, not rezoning one or two properties with the hope of change. He added that he is a big proponent of finding places for higher density housing and this is probably a good place for it assuming it can be made pedestrian friendly. Baker said he would like the minutes to reflect that the Commission is recommending the Council think bigger, and more dramatic in this area and to use some higher risk, more influential tools they have at their disposal. Blum said he thinks starting small might be a good first step in the right direction. MOVED by Cera, seconded by Waldhauser and motion carried unanimously to recommend approval of changing the designation on the General Land Use Plan Map from Commercial to High Density Residential for the properties at 9000 and 9050 Golden Valley Road. --Short Recess-- 5. Repo on Meet gs of the Hogg and Redevelopment Authority, City Council, and Zoning peals and other Meetings No reports were giv P 3-8 Chapter Tabte 3.2: Definition Of Land Use Categories Residential, Low-Density Single-family detached homes are the predominant low-density residential use, with small clusters of (0.1 to 5 homes per gross two-family attached homes mixed in at scattered locations as appropriate. Other types of residential structures in planned unit developments (PUDs) may also be appropriate as long as the overall density of acre of land area) development falls within the acceptable range. Metro Council equivalent is "single family." Residential, Medium- Medium-density residential uses include two-family attached homes in clusters of more than 10 units, or Density (from 5 to 11.99 townhomes, or other types of housing in PUDs where the average density of development falls within the homes per gross acre of land acceptable range. Metro Council equivalent is part of"multi-family." area) Residential, Medium- Townhomes, apartment buildings, and condominiums are the permitted medium-high-density residential High-Density (12 to 19.9 uses. Other types of housing in PUDs are also appropriate in these areas if they are developed to meet homes per gross acre of land the minimum density threshold. Metro Council equivalent is part of"multi-family." area) Residential, High- Apartment buildings and condominiums are the predominant high-density residential uses. Other types of Density (20 to 30 homes housing in PUDs are also appropriate in these areas if they are developed to meet the minimum density per gross acre of land area) threshold. Metro Council equivalent is part of"multi-family." This limited use category features general office buildings. Medical or laboratory facilities where work is Commercial Office performed in a predominantly office setting are also acceptable uses. Office areas may include mixed-use office/residential PUDs. Metro Council equivalent is part of"commercial." Commercial uses include retail sales/services, restaurants, hotels/motels, and for-profit entertainment/ Commercial Retail/ recreation facilities, as well as anything allowed in an office area. Mixed-use commercial/residential Service PUDs are also a possibility. Metro Council equivalent is"commercial,"except that does NOT classify any residential care facilities as commercial uses. This category includes warehousing and storage, assembly and light manufacturing, truck/van terminals, Light Industrial utility installations, offices, and large-scale specialty retail operations such as lumber yards, greenhous- es, and vehicle sales/rental lots. Metro Council equivalent is part of"industrial." Industrial This category includes anything that could go into a light industrial area, as well as railroad uses, animal care facilities, and heavy manufacturing. Metro Council equivalent is part of"industrial." This category includes a mix of residential, commercial, institutional, and business-oriented land uses. Mixed Use This area was established to encourage a compact urban area that will serve as a gateway to the city. Transit-oriented development is expected to spur high-density development that is encouraged to include a mix of uses.Approximattey 25 percent of this area is expected to include residential development. Open Space(public and These uses include golf courses, ball fields, playgrounds, parks, nature areas, and storm water ponding private) areas. Metro Council equivalent is "parks and recreation,"except the Metro Council does not specify ponding areas or nature areas. Schools and Religious These include education facilities at all levels, the cemetery, places of worship for all denominations, Facilities and miscellaneous religious installations. Metro Council equivalent is part of"public, semi-public." Public Facilities, Administrative or service installations (except those otherwise classified)at all levels of government fall Miscellaneous into this category. Metro Council equivalent is part of"public, semi-public." Public Facilities, Residential treatment or care facilities, hospitals and surgical centers, private clubs, and other not-for- Semi-Public profit facilities (except those otherwise classified)fall into this category. Metro Council equivalent is part Miscelof public, semi-public, except for residential treatment or care. Wetland Properties in this category are generally those listed in the National Wetland Inventory. By definition, all wet- land areas are considered to be"in use."Metro Council equivalent is"wetland development constraint." This category includes all areas with a land elevation below the 100-year flood level. By definition, all flood- Floodplain way areas are considered to be"in use."Metro Council equivalent is"floodplain development constraint." Sweeney/Twin Lake, Wirth Lake, DNR unnamed basin#27-36 (in Wirth Park, along the creek north of Open Water Highway 55), and Bassett Creek are classified as open water areas. By definition, all open water is consid- ered to be "in use."Metro Council equivalent is"open water." This category includes all land reserved for street or highway uses and for certain transit facilities, Right-of-Way, Road whether by easement or by fee title. By definition, all such right-of-way is considered to be "in use." Metro Council equivalent is "roadways, option 2." Right-of-Way, Railroad This category includes all land reserved for railroad uses, whether by easement or by fee title. By defini- tion, all such right-of-way is considered to be "in use. There is no Metro Council equivalent. City of • •- - Comprehensive Plan 2008-2018 Thrive 2040 MSP - Forecasts as of October 15, 2014 2040 forecasts were adopted May 28,2014;2020 and 2030 forecasts were adopted October 15,2014. M ,a Forecasts are periodically revised through Council action;please check Council website to obtain the latest revisions. Forecast for Bloomington changed by Council action,June 11,2014. 0=Rogers annexed Hassan Township in 2012;Census counts are combined. (pt)denotes part of a city,remainder of city is in neighboring county. t=Laketown Township will be fully annexed before 2040,forecast has been reassigned to neighboring cities. Population Households Employment ANOKA COUNTY 2010 2020 2030 2040 2010 2020 2030 2040 2010 2020 2030 2040 Andover 30,598 33,400 34,600 40,700 9,811 11,000 12,900 15,400 4,669 5,000 5,500 6,200 Anoka 17,142 19,100 19,600 20,100 7,060 7,900 8,600 8,900 12,840 14,400 14,500 14,600 Bethel 466 490 520 580 174 190 210 250 86 240 380 530 Blaine(pt) 57,186 67,900 75,200 86,000 21,077 24,500 28,800 33,000 19,668 24,000 24,750 26,600 Centerville 3,792 3,990 4,100 4,200 1,315 1,400 1,520 1,700 409 500 500 500 Circle Pines 4,918 5,100 5,200 5,300 2,006 2,150 2,250 2,300 790 1,160 1,400 1,450 Columbia Heights 19,496 20,000 20,600 21,700 7,926 8,400 8,800 9,300 3,484 4,540 4,790 5,300 Columbus 3,914 3,970 4,510 5,300 1,416 1,580 1,850 2,200 1,172 1,430 1,570 1,850 Coon Rapids 61,476 66,000 70,200 72,500 23,532 26,300 28,300 29,300 23,260 30,700 34,700 35,700 East Bethel 11,626 12,200 14,100 18,200 4,060 4,730 5,700 7,400 1,123 1,550 1,810 2,200 Fridley 27,208 28,100 28,600 29,400 11,110 11,700 12,400 12,800 21,333 25,300 27,000 29,800 Ham Lake 15,296 16,000 16,600 17,300 5,171 5,800 6,400 7,100 2,931 3,650 3,960 4,480 Hilltop 744 950 1,030 1,100 380 480 520 550 314 320 350 360 Lexington 2,049 2,130 2,260 2,300 787 890 970 1,000 467 660 690 700 Lino Lakes 20,216 22,000 24,800 29,000 6,174 7,100 8,700 10,600 3,313 4,420 4,940 6,000 Linwood Township 5,123 4,740 4,700 4,700 1,884 1,920 1,960 2,000 219 330 380 430 Nowthen 4,443 4,700 4,890 5,400 1,450 1,640 1,870 2,100 318 480 580 720 Oak Grove 8,031 8,300 9,200 10,200 2,744 3,140 3,620 4,100 741 870 920 1,010 Ramsey 23,668 25,900 28,300 32,800 8,033 9,100 10,800 13,000 4,779 6,100 6,600 7,600 St.Francis 7,218 7,800 9,300 12,500 2,520 3,030 3,760 5,100 1,537 2,080 2,450 3,000 Spring Lake Park(pt) 6,234 6,410 6,640 6,800 2,597 2,850 3,020 3,100 2,934 3,280 3,610 3,670 Anoka County Total 330,844 359,180 384,950 426,080 121,227 135,800 152,950 171,200 106,387 131,010 141,380 152,700 CARVER COUNTY Benton Township 786 800 780 740 297 300 300 300 274 290 320 350 Camden Township 922 890 860 830 329 330 330 330 56 60 60 60 Carver 3,724 5,900 9,800 15,000 1,182 2,120 3,630 5,600 187 650 1,030 1,700 Chanhassen(pt) 22,952 25,100 29,800 36,200 8,352 9,550 11,500 14,000 9,746 13,440 14,240 16,240 Chaska 23,770 26,200 30,400 34,900 8,816 10,400 12,300 14,200 11,123 13,700 14,900 16,800 Cologne 1,519 2,060 2,900 4,600 539 820 1,190 1,900 270 380 420 470 Dahlgren Township 1,331 1,190 960 720 494 430 370 300 202 420 310 200 Hamburg 513 530 550 600 201 210 230 250 109 110 130 150 Hancock Township 345 360 390 410 127 140 160 170 10 10 10 10 Hollywood Township 1,041 1,070 1,160 1,200 387 420 460 500 90 140 150 150 Laketown Township t 2,243 1,320 620 - 660 440 220 - 116 90 40 - Mayer 1,749 1,870 2,230 3,000 589 710 880 1,200 151 160 180 200 New Germany 372 500 600 1,400 146 200 250 600 46 60 70 90 Norwood Young America 3,549 4,420 5,900 8,800 1,389 1,900 2,600 3,900 1,165 1,390 1,790 2,300 San Francisco Township 832 880 930 960 307 340 370 400 46 60 80 100 Victoria 7,345 9,400 11,400 15,000 2,435 3,360 4,260 5,700 1,502 1,430 1,780 2,270 Waconia 10,697 12,900 16,700 22,100 3,909 4,970 6,700 8,900 5,578 7,200 8,300 10,200 Waconia Township 1,228 1,320 1,470 1,500 434 490 540 600 98 210 300 400 Watertown 4,205 4,460 5,200 6,700 1,564 1,840 2,200 2,900 556 750 940 1,220 Watertown Township 1,204 1,290 1,160 1,100 468 500 500 500 392 420 410 400 Young America Township 715 720 740 760 266 280 290 300 119 110 110 120 Carver County Total 91,042 103,180 124,550 156,520 32,891 39,750 49,280 62,550 1 31,836 41,080 45,570 53,430 Population Households Employment DAKOTA COUNTY 2010 2020 2030 2040 2010 2020 2030 2040 2010 2020 2030 2040 Apple Valley 49,084 56,300 62,900 65,600 18,875 22,500 25,500 26,500 14,279 17,300 19,100 19,500 Burnsville 60,306 62,900 65,400 66,700 24,283 25,900 27,100 27,700 31,593 39,300 43,100 44,100 Castle Rock Township 1,342 1,330 1,310 1,300 504 520 520 520 356 360 360 360 Coates 161 160 150 150 66 70 70 70 109 110 110 110 Douglas Township 716 730 730 790 259 280 280 320 92 100 100 100 Eagan 64,206 70,800 76,100 79,000 25,249 28,200 30,400 31,500 49,526 62,600 68,600 70,200 Empire Township 2,444 3,170 4,190 5,300 792 1,150 1,570 2,000 255 260 280 300 Eureka Township 1,426 1,490 1,570 1,700 518 570 640 700 460 460 460 460 Farmington 21,086 22,100 26,000 31,500 7,066 8,100 9,800 12,000 4,438 5,200 5,900 7,200 Greenvale Township 803 830 860 890 275 300 320 350 49 270 440 630 Hampton 689 720 750 780 245 260 270 300 127 140 150 160 Hampton Township 903 940 1,010 1,100 329 370 410 450 85 90 90 90 Hastings(pt) 22,172 23,100 25,900 30,100 8,735 9,600 11,000 12,900 8,532 9,130 9,920 11,300 Inver Grove Heights 33,880 37,000 42,100 47,600 13,476 15,300 17,600 19,900 9,442 11,300 12,400 14,000 Lakeville 55,954 61,600 71,800 82,900 18,683 22,100 26,300 30,500 13,862 18,400 20,200 23,400 Lilydale 623 910 940 1,000 375 530 570 600 355 420 420 420 Marshan Township 1,106 1,130 1,210 1,300 403 440 480 520 117 230 300 370 Mendota 198 270 290 320 78 110 120 130 270 280 300 300 Mendota Heights 11,071 12,100 13,000 13,400 4,378 4,820 5,200 5,300 11,550 12,600 14,200 14,400 Miesville 125 130 130 130 52 60 60 60 116 120 130 140 New Trier 112 120 150 150 41 50 50 50 35 40 50 60 Nininger Township 950 970 960 950 372 380 390 400 149 210 270 340 Northfield(pt) 1,147 1,350 1,700 2,100 414 550 720 900 470 480 490 500 Randolph 436 450 440 440 168 180 180 180 122 130 130 130 Randolph Township 659 690 670 650 246 270 280 280 113 120 120 120 Ravenna Township 2,336 2,400 2,450 2,500 780 840 930 1,000 38 50 60 60 Rosemount 21,874 24,700 30,500 36,300 7,587 9,000 11,500 14,000 6,721 9,000 10,700 13,900 Sciota Township 414 440 450 500 140 160 170 190 33 190 340 500 South St. Paul 20,160 21,300 22,000 22,500 8,186 9,000 9,400 9,600 8,557 8,600 9,600 11,000 Sunfish Lake 521 520 520 520 183 190 200 210 8 10 10 10 Vermillion 419 420 420 410 156 160 160 170 93 140 180 210 Vermillion Township 1,192 1,320 1,500 1,700 424 500 580 660 90 90 90 90 Waterford Township 497 510 520 560 193 210 220 240 679 760 780 820 West St.Paul 19,540 21,700 22,900 23,900 8,529 9,600 10,100 10,500 7,471 8,900 9,600 10,600 Dakota County Total 398,552 434,600 481,520 524,740 152,060 172,270 193,090 210,700 170,192 207,390 228,980 245,880 HENNEPIN COUNTY Bloomington' 82,893 87,300 91,200 95,400 35,905 38,400 40,100 41,900 86,530 100,600 105,800 111,000 Brooklyn Center 30,104 31,000 32,900 34,700 10,756 11,800 12,800 13,600 11,001 12,900 13,900 15,400 Brooklyn Park 75,781 84,100 91,500 95,500 26,229 30,700 33,900 35,500 24,084 34,500 40,600 42,000 Champlin 23,089 23,900 24,200 25,500 8,328 8,800 9,400 10,000 4,012 4,860 5,500 5,600 Chanhassen(pt) - - - - - - - - 1,159 1,160 1,160 1,160 Corcoran 5,379 7,200 9,500 11,900 1,867 2,700 3,700 4,700 1,093 1,340 1,660 2,200 Crystal 22,151 22,800 23,100 23,300 9,183 9,500 9,800 10,000 3,929 4,640 4,970 5,500 Dayton(pt) 4,617 6,600 9,100 10,600 1,619 2,500 3,700 4,500 921 1,540 2,070 3,000 Deephaven 3,642 3,790 3,860 3,900 1,337 1,370 1,390 1,400 688 820 820 820 Eden Prairie 60,797 71,800 80,200 84,800 23,930 28,800 32,300 34,000 48,775 60,900 68,300 70,000 Edina 47,941 49,800 51,800 53,300 20,672 21,500 22,400 23,000 47,457 51,400 53,200 56,100 Excelsior 2,188 2,330 2,390 2,600 1,115 1,170 1,190 1,300 2,220 2,200 2,200 2,200 Fort Snelling(unorg.) 149 260 320 350 135 170 190 200 23,215 23,800 24,800 26,000 Golden Valley 20,371 22,000 23,200 24,300 8,816 9,400 9,900 10,300 33,194 37,500 38,900 41,500 Greenfield 2,777 2,870 3,370 4,100 936 1,070 1,300 1,600 613 620 660 750 Greenwood 688 780 800 810 290 300 300 300 82 200 340 350 Hanover(pt) 609 550 530 520 196 200 200 200 36 50 50 50 Hopkins 17,591 19,700 20,800 21,600 8,366 9,300 9,700 10,000 11,009 14,000 14,000 14,000 Population Households Employment 2010 2020 2030 2040 2010 2020 2030 2040 2010 2020 2030 2040 Independence 3,504 4,050 4,420 5,400 1,241 1,440 1,780 2,200 587 670 710 770 Long Lake 1,768 1,890 1,940 2,100 732 810 910 1,000 1,093 1,560 1,860 1,930 Loretto 650 660 670 670 269 290 300 300 366 370 370 370 Maple Grove 61,567 69,300 76,000 84,800 22,867 26,100 29,400 33,000 29,877 39,500 43,100 49,500 Maple Plain 1,768 1,980 2,190 2,300 723 850 950 1,000 1,579 1,740 1,740 1,750 Medicine Lake 371 400 400 400 160 170 170 170 15 60 100 100 Medina 4,892 5,800 7,000 9,000 1,702 2,200 2,700 3,500 3,351 4,550 4,550 4,580 Minneapolis 382,578 424,700 449,500 466,400 163,540 184,200 195,600 202,700 281,732 324,000 334,500 356,000 Minnetonka 49,734 55,900 60,600 63,000 21,901 24,600 26,600 27,500 44,228 55,700 61,700 63,200 Minnetonka Beach 539 570 610 610 201 210 220 220 174 210 250 250 Minnetrista 6,384 7,500 9,800 13,000 2,176 2,770 3,740 5,000 665 700 720 740 Mound 9,052 9,600 9,900 10,500 3,974 4,220 4,510 4,800 1,165 1,550 1,840 1,900 New Hope 20,339 21,100 22,000 22,800 8,427 9,000 9,500 9,800 11,080 12,400 13,600 15,300 Orono 7,437 8,000 8,300 9,400 2,826 3,050 3,430 3,900 1,562 1,590 1,660 1,780 Osseo 2,430 2,660 2,900 3,100 1,128 1,270 1,400 1,500 1,749 2,130 2,280 2,530 Plymouth 70,576 75,400 81,600 87,800 28,663 30,600 33,100 35,500 46,227 54,900 59,400 66,500 Richfield 35,228 37,300 38,800 39,900 14,818 16,200 17,000 17,500 15,604 17,500 17,700 18,400 Robbinsdale 13,953 14,600 14,800 15,300 6,032 6,300 6,600 6,800 6,858 7,300 7,400 7,600 Rockford(pt) 426 520 660 800 184 250 330 400 94 260 400 550 Rogers0 11,197 12,600 16,200 21,300 3,748 4,690 6,200 8,200 7,907 10,000 11,500 14,800 St.Anthony(pt) 5,156 5,240 5,860 6,300 2,210 2,480 2,770 3,000 1,626 1,930 1,940 2,090 St. Bonifacius 2,283 2,210 2,200 2,200 863 880 890 900 478 480 500 500 St.Louis Park 45,250 50,100 52,700 54,500 21,743 23,700 24,800 25,500 40,485 44,500 46,200 49,100 Shorewood 7,307 7,400 7,400 7,400 2,658 2,820 2,940 3,000 1,113 1,200 1,200 1,200 Spring Park 1,669 1,950 2,120 2,200 897 1,000 1,070 1,100 583 650 690 700 Tonka Bay 1,475 1,490 1,500 1,500 586 630 670 680 298 440 540 570 Wayzata 3,688 4,270 4,670 4,900 1,795 2,070 2,210 2,300 4,567 5,300 5,800 5,900 Woodland 437 490 530 540 169 180 180 180 8 10 20 20 Hennepin County Total 1,152,425 1,264,460 1,354,040 1,431,300 475,913 530,660 572,240 604,150 805,089 944,230 1,001,200 1,066,260 RAMSEY COUNTY Arden Hills 9,552 11,400 13,300 13,500 2,957 3,750 4,600 4,600 12,402 15,100 17,900 18,400 Blaine(pt) - - - - - - - - 893 900 950 1,000 Falcon Heights 5,321 5,400 5,400 5,300 2,131 2,170 2,180 2,200 5,298 5,300 6,000 6,800 Gem Lake 393 500 570 590 155 210 240 250 526 560 630 640 Lauderdale 2,379 2,450 2,430 2,400 1,130 1,160 1,180 1,200 718 690 830 1,000 Little Canada 9,773 10,400 10,800 11,100 4,393 4,640 4,810 4,900 5,467 7,700 8,500 8,700 Maplewood 38,018 41,200 44,800 47,900 14,882 16,700 18,400 19,700 27,635 32,000 33,700 36,600 Mounds View 12,155 12,400 12,500 13,100 4,954 5,100 5,200 5,500 6,386 6,900 7,200 8,200 New Brighton 21,456 23,000 24,600 26,000 8,915 9,800 10,600 11,200 9,213 11,200 12,100 13,500 North Oaks 4,469 4,760 4,800 4,900 1,746 1,920 2,040 2,100 1,260 1,300 1,300 1,300 North St.Paul 11,460 12,200 12,500 13,100 4,615 5,100 5,400 5,700 2,942 3,120 3,330 3,610 Roseville 33,660 35,100 35,900 38,700 14,623 15,100 15,600 17,000 35,104 39,700 41,300 44,100 St.Anthony(pt) 3,070 3,810 4,090 4,300 1,638 1,800 1,930 2,000 1,357 1,710 1,870 2,050 St.Paul 285,068 308,600 324,100 334,700 111,001 125,000 132,800 137,600 175,933 190,900 201,900 218,000 Shoreview 25,043 26,200 27,200 27,500 10,402 10,800 11,200 11,300 11,665 13,300 15,200 15,500 Spring Lake Park(pt) 178 180 200 220 75 80 90 100 66 80 90 100 Vadnais Heights 12,302 13,200 14,100 14,500 5,066 5,700 6,100 6,300 6,678 10,200 12,100 12,600 White Bear Township 10,949 11,300 11,800 12,000 4,261 4,570 4,790 4,900 2,309 3,570 4,580 4,780 White Bear Lake(pt) 23,394 23,890 25,460 27,500 9,747 10,320 11,100 12,000 11,085 11,760 11,780 11,800 Ramsey County Total 508,640 545,990 574,550 597,310 202,691 223,920 238,260 248,550 316,937 355,990 381,260 408,680 Population Households Employment SCOTT COUNTY 2010 2020 2030 2040 2010 2020 2030 2040 2010 2020 2030 2040 Belle Plaine 6,661 7,700 9,600 13,300 2,362 2,950 3,780 5,300 1,847 2,630 2,860 3,300 Belle Plaine Township 878 850 840 820 310 320 320 320 69 70 70 70 Blakeley Township 418 390 380 370 165 170 170 170 69 80 90 100 Cedar Lake Township 2,779 3,050 3,200 3,600 939 1,070 1,230 1,400 82 170 260 340 Credit River Township 5,096 5,300 5,200 5,000 1,662 1,730 1,820 1,900 397 400 410 420 Elko New Market 4,110 5,800 8,000 12,200 1,259 1,910 2,820 4,500 317 530 650 840 Helena Township 1,648 1,740 1,720 1,700 548 590 650 700 147 150 150 150 Jackson Township 1,464 1,370 1,320 1,300 486 500 500 500 168 310 420 530 Jordan 5,470 7,100 7,700 10,700 1,871 2,360 3,040 4,300 1,587 2,180 2,450 2,900 Louisville Township 1,266 1,230 1,210 1,200 425 430 430 430 298 300 300 300 New Market Township 3,440 3,310 3,300 3,300 1,146 1,170 1,180 1,200 325 490 500 500 New Prague(pt) 4,280 4,940 6,050 7,200 1,618 2,050 2,580 3,100 2,142 2,450 2,800 3,270 Prior Lake 22,796 25,500 31,300 39,300 8,447 10,000 12,500 15,700 7,766 9,400 10,700 12,900 St.Lawrence Township 483 560 690 810 161 210 270 320 48 50 50 50 Sand Creek Township 1,521 1,440 1,420 1,400 554 560 560 560 298 380 420 460 Savage 26,911 33,900 36,700 38,200 9,116 11,600 13,400 14,300 6,753 8,400 9,300 9,500 Shakopee 37,076 41,800 49,300 57,400 12,772 15,300 18,400 21,500 18,831 23,600 27,000 31,900 Spring Lake Township 3,631 3,840 3,970 4,100 1,267 1,370 1,480 1,600 390 400 400 400 Scott County Total 129,928 149,820 171,900 201,900 45,108 54,290 65,130 77,800 41,534 51,990 58,830 67,930 WASHINGTON COUNTY Afton 2,886 2,960 3,050 3,100 1,081 1,140 1,230 1,300 411 470 480 490 Bayport 3,471 3,900 4,210 4,400 855 1,070 1,220 1,300 3,790 4,370 4,990 5,100 Baytown Township 1,617 1,660 1,850 2,000 573 620 700 760 69 110 190 260 Birchwood Village 870 860 850 840 351 360 360 360 25 20 30 30 Cottage Grove 34,589 37,500 43,200 49,300 11,719 13,700 16,200 18,600 6,484 7,600 8,400 9,600 Dellwood 1,065 1,080 1,090 1,100 373 400 420 450 277 270 280 300 Denmark Township 1,737 1,890 2,170 2,500 615 730 860 1,000 629 630 640 650 Forest Lake 18,377 19,700 23,300 28,300 7,015 8,100 9,800 12,000 6,449 7,400 8,200 9,700 Grant 4,094 4,270 4,280 4,300 1,463 1,530 1,620 1,700 449 610 700 840 Grey Cloud Island Township 295 280 280 280 117 120 120 120 10 20 30 40 Hastings(pt) - - - - - - - - 64 70 80 100 Hugo 13,332 16,700 23,300 32,500 4,990 6,800 9,800 13,600 1,973 2,990 3,290 4,000 Lake Elmo 8,061 10,300 14,500 20,500 2,776 3,880 5,700 8,000 1,941 2,550 2,740 3,160 Lakeland 1,796 1,730 1,680 1,500 681 690 700 710 302 400 440 470 Lakeland Shores 311 310 340 360 117 130 150 160 26 30 40 40 Lake St.Croix Beach 1,053 1,160 1,000 1,000 460 470 480 500 129 130 130 130 Landfall 663 770 770 770 257 300 300 300 25 30 30 30 Mahtomedi 7,676 7,800 7,700 7,700 2,827 2,950 3,050 3,100 2,090 2,510 2,620 2,660 Marine on St.Croix 689 780 890 1,000 302 350 400 450 124 140 150 160 May Township 2,776 2,980 3,360 3,800 1,083 1,230 1,410 1,600 66 130 150 180 Newport 3,435 3,730 4,230 4,600 1,354 1,630 1,910 2,100 1,605 1,990 1,960 2,000 Oakdale 27,401 28,800 30,400 31,000 10,956 11,900 12,700 13,000 8,651 12,500 14,500 15,000 Oak Park Heights 4,445 5,100 5,600 5,800 1,911 2,240 2,490 2,600 4,358 6,000 7,300 7,500 Pine Springs 408 390 380 370 144 150 150 150 72 80 80 80 St.Marys Point 366 340 340 330 147 150 150 150 15 20 20 20 St. Paul Park 5,273 5,600 6,500 7,900 1,967 2,250 2,700 3,300 1,515 1,830 2,070 2,520 Scandia 3,934 4,090 4,530 5,000 1,498 1,670 1,890 2,100 519 610 650 730 Stillwater 18,227 20,000 21,700 22,500 7,076 8,300 9,100 9,500 9,628 10,700 11,500 11,700 Stillwater Township 2,364 2,460 2,530 2,700 855 920 1,020 1,100 165 200 230 250 West Lakeland Township 4,054 4,100 4,050 4,000 1,286 1,350 1,430 1,500 232 320 340 370 White Bear Lake(pt) 403 460 580 680 198 200 250 300 184 190 200 200 Willernie 507 500 490 480 218 230 230 230 182 200 200 200 Woodbury 61,961 74,000 84,400 87,200 22,594 27,200 31,500 33,100 19,438 23,900 25,700 28,700 Washington County Total 238,136 266,200 303,550 337,810 87,859 102,760 120,040 135,140 71,897 89,020 98,360 107,210 METRO AREA 2,849,567 3,123,430 3,395,060 3,675,660 1,117,749 1,259,450 1,390,990 1,510,090 1,543,872 1,820,710 1,955,580 2,102,090 Wittman, Lisa From: Helen Liss Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2015 10:03 AM To: Wittman, Lisa Subject: Issues regarding Amendment to General Land Use/Hwy 55 Area Dear Planning Commission Members, We are property owners at 9010 and 9300 (Olson Highway) Golden Valley Road as well as residents of Golden Valley. We received the Notice of Informal Public Hearing to consider amending the 2010-2030 General Plan Use Map for properties at 9000 and 9050 Golden Valley Road and have questions and issues on this potential change. 1. Why are these changes being considered?Who or what are the driving forces behind these possible changes? There was no interested party's name on the notice we received on Friday, April 3, 2015, however there was an interested developer's representative for possible rental senior, lower income residences, at the Council/Manager's meeting on March 10, 2015? According to the City's planning office, the considered change wasn't in response to an interested developer. Seems to be a discrepancy.The Planning Commission didn't seem to think this was a good thing to consider at the February 23, 2015 meeting, so why is it being considered again? 2. Our properties'future marketability in terms of leasing or selling to a retail/commercial user could be negatively impacted if you change the land use in this area of Golden Valley. This change could result in our properties becoming "retail/commercial islands". 3. The idea of making this area part of a Pedestrian Overlay doesn't make sense in terms of its proximity to the downtown of Golden Valley. Maybe the members of the Planning Commission could consider walking from this area to the downtown Golden Valley area to see if they think this is feasible. If our properties were included in a Pedestrian Overland District,there could be considerable restrictions on the use of our properties in the future. Even if sidewalks are added, we DO have winter 6 months out of the year here and if the potential "walkers" are seniors and the handicapped from the JHAP facility, it doesn't seem feasible for them to walk on icy sidewalks, across Boone, around the curving Golden Valley Road. The "vision" for this area may not be workable or sensible. Thank you for listening to our concerns. Helen and Jonathan Liss 235 Nevada Ave. So. Golden Valley, MN 55426 1 is Pik z j d , 1 h oaervq Pail, ( B.ed w l I P°rk Pwtl i P o` 2010-2030 GENERAL LAND USE PLAN 'w^gCITY OF NEW HOPE CITY OF NEW HOPE i CITY OF CRYSTAL a z xOE]awJ.',"J'IIII%x.,p,.....a-,°.ti,m_i-e�«..0_' �V,•",n,n33ia,'..�.0u,;vwei,e4,.•`,a„c x<m.v<�oi'-en-i,.a-,P.3. 1we„»'°.•,.iwa.aa<•� ',}'a 34�`�•� >��”�`r_•f, Y /J•ti h,��\""'�j'.`''d?r!5ur,...a_&xEr"�"w',�w"Y..w..z:,-. ,rai°uM°a• rMawn<.00n,a.7-:.»a°wa a.,6, dz n.,n0ra..w.\na•:•.mnj4e^6k:Pas a's;dz w:.wwa g�_ mxe"eMp :ez - 5•,,,P PaPaP.y varn;i ni�Fu CITY.s"ro,anO F R- Oa$w+c,•4^M+B.€.m"BL`rIrnwN.,as6�,leS aal9grsV•nD Aw•,Lw"— d.E..° •'+,'4u� 0Residential Low Den s ity (Less than 5 unitss per acre) e ) TMedium-Low Density (5 to 11.9 units per acre) " - ° Medium-High Density (12 to 19.9 units per acre)paZ High Density (zo or more units per acre) OU O commercial Office U ne Retail/service e (also 00i n cludes. O1 .1f 0Fc0ee e)rWkRwn Industrial . (also includesOficel)Light Industrial Industrial (also incudes Office) + Mixed Use Theodore Wirth A Regional Park 9 (mpr5 Park&Rec Boar) Open Space Public and Private Ovm e rshi p Schools and Religious Facilities4.as»d . �" _ Public Facilities— Miscellaneous Semi-Public Facilities- Miscellaneous ubect PropertiesOpen Water— Based on 2008 Aerial Photography Wetlands— National Wetlands Inventory.Barr Engin eeri ng and HR Green 1999 SWMP-not field verified JR Railroad:, Road ss ---- WirthP. Private StreetsLake Municipal Line z 7 Pek Date Decam be 4 2008 V O som -Hennepin County Surveyors Office for PropertyLines/2008) 2 DNR,NRGreen,Bennginaenngfor Wetlands CityofGo/den Valeyfore11otherlyrs.u Oj ' z a'e W��. CITY OF Westwood - .� I ww,..a,a ST.LOUIS PARK "-^"`i_-- a"ra" Lake „°a.,.M \ CITY OF ST.LOUIS PAR[ ,.., a\ Y a / L it - a1• { � ^�� City of Golden vaaey (�IOWn1e 7800 Golden Valley Road - • ; Y Golden Viiby,MN 554274588 i a €' °°° .• Lade 76}593-8095 , ---_--_` w 3-593-fenvallevmn.n°v •—M--e..y...... �.,.,__ P ` __ I:\Maps\GeneralLandUsePlan2010-2030_24z3fi.pdf Resolution 15-39 May 5, 2015 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION FOR AMENDMENT TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN'S GENERAL LAND USE PLAN MAP RE-DESIGNATING THE PROPERTIES AT 9000 AND 9050 GOLDEN VALLEY ROAD FROM COMMERCIAL TO HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL WHEREAS, the City Council has met at the time and place specified in a notice duly published with respect to the subject matter hereof and has heard all interested persons, and it appearing in the interest of the public that the General Land Use Plan Map as heretofore adopted and enacted by the City of Golden Valley be amended. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council for the City of Golden Valley, that pursuant to the provision of Chapter 11.90, Subd. 7 of the City Code for the City of Golden Valley, and subject to review and approval by the Metropolitan Council for conformity with regional systems plan as provided in state law, the General Land Use Plan Map for the City of Golden Valley is hereby amended by changing the properties at 9000 and 9050 Golden Valley Road from Commercial to High Density Residential. Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by the City Clerk. city (?f �� goldcn valley � �� ,� Recreation Department v�� []i�� '� ��^u��&�l0 ��l��=^~��^ °� 763-512-2345/763-512-2344(fsx) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting May 5' 2015 Agenda Item 5. A. Authorize City Manager to Sign Contract with Hammel, Green and Abrahamson (HGA) for Replacement of8rookvievvCommunity Center Phase || Prepared By Rick Birno, Director of Parks and Recreation Sue Virni8, Director ofFinance Summary At the April 14th, 2015, Council/Manager meeting, Council directed staff to budget for the planning stages and begin the process to replace Brookvievv Community Center. Staff is recommending hiring HGA, consultant team that worked with staff and the Community Center Task Force on the initial feasibility study, to begin the Preclesign Phase and public input process. This stage of planning would begin in fall of 2015. The goal of this step is to appropriately size the conceptual design to align with City Council direction for the replacement of the current Brookvievv Community [enter. This stage of the design process includes e public input process to generate ideas and share information with residents. Preclesi8n Phase includes the following steps: 1. Planning Kick-off 2. Options on what program is included in project design/budget 3. Plan diagrams on how it might fit on the site including phasing 4. Review with cost estimating 5. Host two Public Open House Forums, attend check-in meetings with Open Space and Recreation Commission and make final presentation to City Council 6. Final presentation and Report The fee for this Predesign Phase is $30,000 which will come from the Building Improvement Fund. Additional monies were transferred tothis fund at the April Zl, 2015, Council Meeting. Schematic Design would begin in 2016 and will be included in the 2016-2020 Capital Improvement Fund Attachments • Resolution Authorizing City Manager to Sign Contract with HGA for Replacement of Brookview Community Center Phase II (1 page) Recommended Action Motion to adopt Resolution Authorizing City Manager to Sign Contract with HGA for Replacement of Brookview Community Center Phase II. Resolution 15-40 May 5, 2015 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CITY MANAGER TO SIGN CONTRACT WITH HAMMEL, GREEN AND ABRAHAMSON, INC (HGA) FOR REPLACEMENT OF BROOKVIEW COMMUNITY CENTER PHASE II WHEREAS, the City Council of Golden Valley reviewed the need to replace Brookview Community Center; and WHEREAS, the City Council of Golden Valley appointed a Brookview Community Task Force to develop a feasibility study and conceptual design on May 6, 2014; and WHEREAS, the City Council of Golden Valley was presented the results from the Brookview Task Force on December 9, 2014 and received and filed their report on January 20, 2015; and WHEREAS, the City Council of Golden Valley directed staff at their April 14, 2015, Council Manager meeting to come forth with a plan for public input and plan for a replacement of Brookview Community Center between 9 and 12 million dollars. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of Golden Valley that it authorizes the City Manager to sign the contract for Hammel, Green and Abrahamson (HGA) for Phase II which involves the Predesign with public input. Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: Kristine A Luedke, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by the City Clerk. Ctt-V tJt gTo I 'd e- t�V� MEMORANDUM valley Administrative Services Department 763-593-8013/763-593-3969(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting May 5, 2015 Agenda Item 5. B. Second Consideration of Council Salaries Prepared By Susan Virnig, Finance Director/Deputy City Clerk Summary City Code Section 2.19 Subdivision 5, states that in April of each odd numbered year, the City' s staff shall provide to the Council the percentage representing the average salary or wage increase for City non-union employees for the previous two years so that the Council may consider appropriate increases in its salaries. Council salaries are reviewed every two years preceding the city election. Below is the salary or wage increase for City non-union employees for the previous two years. 2015 2.5% 2014 2.5% Current Salary New Salary Mayor $11,619 $12,207 Council Members $ 8,696 $ 9,136 In 2006, the Election Task Force report was received and filed. The report included that salaries for Council should receive a cost of living increase. Since 2006, the salary for council and mayor has not been increased. The 2015-2016 Council Budget has included an increase for salaries for these positions starting January 1, 2016, On April 21, 2015, Council approved the first reading. Tonight is the second consideration of Ordinance #555. The increase, if approved, would begin January 2016. Attachments • City Code Section 2.19 (1 page) • Section from 2006 Election Task Force report (2 pages) • Survey of Council Salaries (2 pages) • Ordinance #555 - Amending Salaries of Mayor and Council Members (1 page) Recommended Action Motion to adopt upon second consideration Ordinance #555, Amending Salaries of Mayor and Council Members. § 2.19 Section 2.19: Salaries of Mayors and Council Members Subdivision 1 The annual salary of the Mayor shall be $11,619.00. Subdivision 2 The annual salary of each Council Member shall be $8,696.00. Source: Ordinance No. 281, 2nd Series Effective Date: 7-18-03 Subdivision 3. Approved Additional Meetings In addition to their salaries, the Mayor and Council shall be paid $50.00 for each meeting they are directed or designated to attend, up to a maximum of $150.00 per month. The method for approval of meetings shall be outlined by resolution of the Council. Source: Ordinance No. 63, 2nd Series Effective Date: 4-25-91 Subdivision 4 The salaries provided for herein shall be effective January 1, 2004. Source: Ordinance No. 281, 2nd Series Effective Date: 7-18-03 Subdivision 5 In April of each odd numbered year, the City's staff shall provide to the Council the percentage representing the average salary or wage increase for City non-union employees for the previous two years so that the Council may consider appropriate increases in its salaries. Source: Ordinance No. 63, 2nd Series Effective Date: 4-25-91 Golden Valley City Code Page 1 of 1 Mayoral Te Issue: Should t term of the Mayor remain a two year term, or should the term b four year term? The Mayoral term i olden Valley is currently a two year term while ity Council Member terms are fo ears. Commission members contacted of Plan B cities to ask the following questa s: 'A • What is the current oral term length in your ci • Do you have a prefere for term length? • If so, what is the reason your preference Responses indicated that eight of th elve es surveyed preferred a four year term length. Reasons stated were tha a ur year term allowed more time to establish relationships and trust within constituent base. Four years also allowed more time to learn the job and take arg scale issues. Some responders believed the longer term provide ore cont ity and stability for the City. Some cities stated that with a two ye erm, campai . g becomes burdensome and can distract the Mayor from oth ssues. Fourteen citizens su ed at the Voter Fair preferre four year term and three persons thought th erm should be just two years. Recommend on: The Task Force strongly supports a mo to a four year Mayoral term. Esta shing the longer term length will require adjustor is in election cycles. The pro s used to accomplish that change will require fu onsideration. Council Salaries Issue: Is the current level of compensation for Mayor and Council Members appropriate? The Task Force reviewed Council and Mayor salary comparisons. In addition to the salary amount, the Task Force considered how the City could attract a more diverse group of candidates for Council and Mayoral seats. Ideas brought forth included: increased monetary compensation, tuition reimbursement and other education benefits, the opportunity to participate in City insurance plans, and reimbursement for meeting and travel expenses related to the work of the Council Members. The Task Force questioned how an ordinance providing additional benefits for Council Members would be enacted, and what authority the city has to provide non-traditional forms of compensation. The group considered the premise that Council salaries may be considered to be symbolic. They discussed the purpose of Council compensation and the effect compensation and benefit levels may have on potential candidates and their decision to run. Responses from the Voter Fair indicated that seven persons believed the Council salary should be increased, and eight believed the salaries should not be increased or should stay the same. Recommendation: The Task Force recommends further deliberation by the City Council in setting compensation limits and offers the following considerations to guide that Council discussion: 1. Consider role of salaries in decision to run; encourage access of under- represented communities in seeking and holding office; define what the symbolic role of compensation means to members of Council. 2. Council "across the board increase"in salaries; stipend to be at or near the top of salary scale for like communities. 3. Enact ordinance that will provide for cost of living increase, Council stipend or some other"objective measurement". 4. Should include enhanced benefits, such as tuition reimbursement, as a means of encouraging Council participation; classes taken should be relevant to City business and there should be "some"maximum on reimbursement amount. Process for filling vacancv on Council Issue: Is the process curt ly in place for filling va ncies on the council adequate? Task Force members in ' ed City Attorne arnard to join in the discussion on this topic. State law requi s the City C ncil to appoint a replacement to serve out the balance of the term the cas f a vacancy. Council has the authority to adopt an ordinance calling fo spe ' I election to fill a vacancy, or to determine the process it will use to make C ncil appointment. Given the cost of a special election and the rarity of ancies, the Task Force agreed that the laws currently in place provide adequ uidance. Also given the fact that vacancies may occur for differing reasons nd different times, the option for flexibility in determining an appropriate pr " ess f filling a vacancy is important to maintain. The Task Force also review statute se� ns regarding removal of a Council Member and determined t t no additional tions exist for the City on this topic beyond current statutes. Recommendation: W ecommend no changes the current process for filling Council vacancies. Group Health Annual Annual Organization Job Title Annual Salary Additional Payment Allowed(Yes Health insurance City Cost City Cost or No) Provider Sltigle Famliy Health Health Albert Lea Council Member $8,000.00 N Albert Lea Mayor $12,000.00 N Andover Council Member $7,500.00 $1.00 per EDA Meeting N N/A Andover Mayor $9,500.00 $1.00 per meeting for EDA N N/A Apple Valley Council Member $8,028.00 Yes BCBS 731.17 1,150.00 Apple Valley Mayor $11,220.00 Yes BOBS NA 1,150.00 Austin Council Member $6,600.00 $0 X N/A Austin Mayor $9,000.00 $0 X N/A Becker Council Member $3,600.00 $150 monthly meeting stipend N N/A Becker Mayor $4,200.00 $150 monthly meeting stipend N N/A Blaine Council Member $10,000.00 Blaine Mayor $13,367.00 Bloomington Council Member $12,396.00 Bloomington Mayor $26,400.00 Brooklyn Center Council Member $9,070.00 No Brooklyn Center Mayor $11,486.00 No Brooklyn Park Council Member $11,400.00 Brooklyn Park Mayor $17,100.00 Burnsville Council Member $8,400.00 0 Y Health Partners 6,798.00 14,350.00 Burnsville Mayor $12,000.00 Champlin Council Member $6,610.00 0 Y Health Partners 0.00 0.00 Champlin Mayor $9,550.00 0 Y Health Partners 0.00 0.00 Chanhassen Council Member $4,800.00 $50 per meeting X Chanhassen Mayor $6,000.00 $50 per meeting X Chaska Council Member $6,948.00 0 X n.a. 0.00 0.00 Chaska Mayor $8,208.00 0 X n.a. 0.00 1 0.00 Columbia Heights Council Member $7,800.00 0 Y Medica 6,089.64 9,660.00 Columbia Heights Mayor $13,800.00 0 Y Medica 6,089.64 9,660.00 Coon Rapids Council Member at large $12,250.00 Coon Rapids Council Member-ward $10,500.00 Coon Rapids Mayor $14,000.00 Cottage Grove Council Member $6,780.00 No Cottage Grove Mayor $9,216.00 No Crystal Council Member $8,169.72 No Crystal Mayor $10,619.84 No Eagan Council Member $10,005.00 Yes BCBS 608.67 0.00 Eagan Mayor $13,624.00 Yes BCBS 608.67 0.00 Eden Prairie Council Member $10,740.00 Eden Prairie Mayor $13,500.00 Edina Council Member $10,740.00 Edina Mayor $13,500.00 Elk River Council Member $7,000.00 $1800 annual for EDA N Elk River Mayor $10,000.00 $1800 annual for EDA N Faribault Council Member $7,220.00 X Faribault Mayor $8,480.00 X Farmington Council Member $7,020.00 No Farmington Mayor $8,040.00 No Forest Lake Council Member $5,500.00 No N Health Partners _ Forest Lake Mayor $6,500.00 No N Health Partners Fridley Council Member $8,650.00 Y PreferredOne 7,111.56 1.0,380.00 Fridley Mayor $10,531.00 Y PreferredOne 7,111.56 10,380,00 Golden Valley Council Member $8,696.00 $50/mtg,up to 3 monthly N Golden Valley Mayor $11,619.00 $50/mtg,up to 3 monthly N Ham Lake Council Member $4,900.00 N/A N Ham Lake Mayor $6,000.00 N/A N Hastings Council Member $6,000.00 0 N Hastings Mayor $8,400.00 0 N Hopkins Council Member $4,600.00 0 X N/A Hopkins Mayor $6,000.00 0 X N/A Inver Grove Heights Council Member $7,000.00 Inver Grove Heights Mayor $9,000.00 Lakeville Council Member $8,664.00 $25 per HRA meeting No LakevilleMayor $9,996.00 $25 per HRA meeting No Lino Lakes Council Member $5,018.00 $40 N None Lino Lakes Mayor $6,272.00 $40 N None Maple Grove Council Member $12,500.00 Maple Grove Mayor $14,500.00 Group Health Annual Annual Health Insurance Cost Organization !ob'"ntle Annual Salary am Additional Payment Allowed(yGcity Cost Provider Single Family or No) Health Health Maplewood Council Member $11,314.00 Maplewood Mayor $12,855.00 Mendota Heights Council Member $4,200.00 Mendota Heights Mayor $5,700.00 Minnetonka Council Member $9,000.00 Minnetonka Mayor $12,000.00 New Brighton Council Member $7,000.00 y Health Partners 7,147.56 7,147.56 New Brighton Mayor $8,600.00 y Health Partners 7,147.56 7,147.56 New Hope Council Member $8,619.00 $25 per EDA meeting X HealthPartners 0.00 0.00 effective 1/1/15 New Hope Mayor $11,801.00 $25 per EDA meeting X HealthPartners 0.00 0.00 effective 1/1/15 Northfield Council Member $7,200,00 0 N N/A 0.00 0.00 Northfield Mayor $9,600.00 0 N N/A 0.00 0.00 Owatonna Council Member $7,200.00 X 0.00 0.00 Owatonna Mayor $9,000.00 Council Pres._$9000.00 X 0.00 0.00 Plymouth Council Member $10,146.00 Plymouth Mayor $14,000.00 Prior Lake Council Member $7,440.00 $50.00 per meeting N N/A 0.00 0.00 Prior Lake Mayor $9,420.00 $50.00 per meeting X N/A 0.00 0.00 Ramsey Council Member $6,000,00 X Ramsey Mayor $8,000.00 X Red Wing Council Member $7,550.40 $75.00 for Board of Equalization mtg N N/A 0.00 0.00 Red Wing Mayor $7,550.40 N N/A 0.00 0.00 Richfield Council Member $8,070.00 N Richfield Mayor $10,379.00 N Robbinsdale Council Member $8,097.00 No $8,259 1/1/16 Robbinsdale Mayor $10,151.00 No $10,3541/1/16 Rosemount Council Member $7,000.00 $35/Port Authority Meeting N effective 1/1/15 Rosemount Mayor $9,200.00 $35/Port Authority Meeting N effective 1/1/15 Roseville Council Member $7,020.00 0 N Roseville Mayor $9,300.00 0 N Sartell Council Member $5,200.00 $0 N Sartell Mayor $7,500.00 $0 N Savage Council Member $6,000.00 0 N Savage Mayor $8,000.00 N Shakopee Council Member $7,500.00 Shakopee Mayor $15,000,00 0 Shoreview Council Member $6,792.00 N Shoreview Mayor $9,156.00 N South St.Paul Council Member $6,600.00 N South St.Paul Mayor $10,200.00 N Spring Lake Park Council Member $5,787.23 N Spring Lake Park Mayor $7,234.04 N St,Louis Park Council Member $6,807.00 $4,385 additional for serving on EDA N St,Louis Park Mayor $11,796.00 $4,385 additional for serving on EDA St,Michael Council Member $0.00 $60.00 per meeting X St.Michael Mayor $0.00 $70.00 per meeting X Stillwater Council Member $7,200.00 y BC/BS 492.00 849.86 Stillwater Mayor $9,000.00 X 492.00 849.86 Waconia Council Member $4,000.00 N Waconia Mayor $4,900.00 N West St.Paul Council Member $6,500.00 X West St.Paul Mayor $8,100.00 X White Bear Lake Council Member $7,680.00 N White Bear Lake Mayor $5,400.00 N Willmar Council Member $7,500.00 $20 per hour y N/A 0.00 0.00 Willmar Mayor $12,000.00 $20 per hour y N/A 0.00 0.00 Winona Council Member $6,696.00 X BC/BS Winona Mayor $9,407.00 X BC/BS Woodbury Council Member $8,100.00 Woodbury Mayor $11,004.00 ORDINANCE NO. 555, 2ND SERIES AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE Amending Salaries of Mayor and Council Members The City Council for the City of Golden Valley hereby ordains: Section 1. City Code Section 2.19, Subd. 1. 2. and 4. are hereby amended to read: Subd. 1. The annual salary of the Mayor shall be $12,207. Subd. 2. The annual salary of each Council Member shall be $9,136 Subd. 4. The salaries provided for herein shall be effective January 1, 2016. Section 2. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" is hereby adopted in its entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law. Adopt by the City Council this 5th day of May, 2015. /s/Shepard M Harris Shepard M Harris, Mayor ATTEST: /s/Kristine A Luedke Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk city0f ,!-& Ar golden MEMORANDUM valley Physical Development Department 763-593-8090/763-593-3997(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting May 5, 2015 Agenda Item 6. A. Adoption of Chapters 1305 and 1323 of the 2015 State Building Code Prepared By Jerry Frevel, Building Official Summary The State of Minnesota will adopt the following Chapters of the 2015 State Building Code on June 2, 2015. These relate to commercial properties or residential properties that are comprised of three or more units. 1305 Minnesota Building Code (amended 2012 IBC) 1323 Minnesota (Commercial) Energy Code Attachments • Chapter 4, Section 4.01, Minnesota Building Code (underlined/strikeout version) (2 pages) • Ordinance #557, Amending the City Code, Adopting the Chapters 1305 and 1323 of the 2015 State Building Code (1 page) Recommended Action Motion to adopt upon first consideration Ordinance #557, adopting Chapters 1305 and 1323 of the 2015 State Building Code. § 4.01 4 • Chapter • BUILDINGS AND SIGNS Section q..o 1: Building Code Adopted The Minnesota State Building Code, established pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 16B.59 to 168.75, one copy of which is on file in the office of the Golden Valley City Clerk, is hereby adopted as the Building Code for the City of Golden Valley. Such code is hereby adopted by reference as though set forth verbatim herein, including the following Chapters: A. 1300 Minnesota Building Code Administration Source: Ordinance No. 543, 2"d Series Effective Date: 3-3-15 B. 1301 Building Official Certification C. 1302 State Building Construction Approvals Source: Ordinance No. 380, 2nd Series Effective Date: 8-9-07 D. 1303 Minnesota Provisions to the State Building Code Source: Ordinance No. 543, 2"d Series Effective Date: 3-3-15 E. 1305 Adeptien ef the 2006 inteffiatienal Building Gede Minnesota Building Code (amended 2012 IBC) F. 1306 Special Fire Protection Systems 1. Chapter 1306.0020 Subd. 2 Source: Ordinance No. 380, 2nd Series Effective Date: 8-9-07 G. 1307 Minnesota Elevators and Related Devices Code H. 1309 Minnesota Residential Code I. 1311 Minnesota Conservation Code for Existing Buildings J. 1315 Adoption of 2014 National Electrical Code Source: Ordinance No. 543, 2"d Series Effective Date: 3-3-15 K. 1325 Solar Energy Systems L. 1330 Fallout Shelters M. 1335 Floodproofing Regulations 1. Parts 1335.0600 through 1335.1100 inclusive N. 1341 Minnesota Accessibility Code Source: Ordinance No. 380, 2nd Series Effective Date: 8-9-07 O. 1346 Minnesota Mechanical and Gas Code Source: Ordinance No. 543, 2"d Series Effective Date: 3-3-15 P. 1350 Manufactured Homes Q. 1360 Prefabricated Structures R. 1361 Industrialized/Modular Buildings S. 1370 Storm Shelters (Manufactured Home Parks) Golden Valley City Code Page 1 of 2 § 4.01 T. 4715 Minnesota Plumbing Code Source: Ordinance No. 380, 2nd Series Effective Date: 8-9-07 U. 1322 Minnesota Residential Energy Code Source: Ordinance No. 543, 2nd Series Effective Date: 3-3-15 V. 1323 GemmeFeial EneFgy Code Minnesota (Commercial) Energy Code Source: Ordinance No. 420, 2„d Series Effective Date: 7-24-09 Golden Valley City Code Page 2 of 2 ORDINANCE NO. 557, 2 ND SERIES AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE Adopting the 2015 State Building Code Chapters 1305 and 1323 The City Council for the City of Golden Valley hereby ordains: Section 1. City Code Section 4.01, entitled "Building Code Adopted" is amended by deleting the following items and replacing them as follows: E. 1305 - Minnesota Building Code (amended 2012 International Building Code) V. 1323 - Minnesota (Commercial) Energy Code Section 2. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 4.99 entitled "Violation A Misdemeanor or Petty Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force from and after its passage and publication. Adopted by the City Council this 5th day of May, 2015. /s/Shepard M. Harris Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: /s/Kristine A. Luedke Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk