The URL can be used to link to this page

04-07-15 CC Agenda Packet (entire) AGENDA Regular Meeting of the City Council Golden Valley City Hall 7800 Golden Valley Road Council Chamber April 7, 2015 6:30 pm The Council may consider item numbers 1, 2, 3, 5 and 6 prior to the public hearings scheduled at 7 pm 1. CALL TO ORDER PAGES A. Roll Call B. Pledge of Allegiance C. Board/Commission Oath of Office and Presentation of Certificate of Appointment D. Proclamation for Genocide Awareness and Prevention Month - April 2015 3 2. ADDITIONS AND CORRECTIONS TO AGENDA 3. CONSENT AGENDA Approval of Consent Agenda - All items listed under this heading are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no discussion of these items unless a Council Member or citizen so requests in which event the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda. A. Approval of Minutes 1. Strategic Planning Retreat - February 5, 2015 4 2. Strategic Planning Retreat - February 23, 2015 5 3. Strategic Planning Retreat - March 12, 2015 6 4. Strategic Planning Retreat - March 14, 2015 7 5. City Council Minutes - March 17, 2015 8-15 B. Approval of Check Register 1. City 16 2. Housing and Redevelopment Authority 17 C. Licenses: 1. Gambling License Exemption and Waiver of Notice Requirement - Fundraising 18-20 Bankers 2. Gambling License Exemption and Waiver of Notice Requirement - Sons of the 21-25 American Legion Post 523 3. Solicitor's License - James Hardie Building Products 26-28 4. General Business Licenses 29-30 5. Multi-Family Rental Property Licenses 31 6. Therapeutic Massage Facility License - Core Healing Arts LLC 32 D. Minutes of Boards and Commissions: 1. Planning Commission - March 9, 2015 33-48 2. Environmental Commission - February 23, 2015 49 3. Teen Committee - December 22, 2014 50-51 4. Human Rights Commission - February 24, 2015 52-54 5. Joint City Council and Planning Commission - February 9, 2015 55-58 6. Joint Environmental Commission and Open Space and Recreation Commission - 59 February 23, 2015 7. Bassett Creek Watershed Commission - February 19, 2015 60-68 3. CONSENT AGENDA - CONTINUED E. Bids and Quotes: 1. Approve Cooperative Agreement with MnDOT for Construction of Highway 55 & 69-80 Winnetka Avenue Intersection Improvement Project 15-26 2. Award Contract for 2015 Pavement Marking Project 81 3. Award Contract for 2015 Asphalt Overlay Project 82-84 4. Award Contract for Twin Lake Alum Treatment Project 85-86 5. Authorize Purchase of Dodge Charger Police Sedan 87-88 6. Authorize Purchase of Compact Excavator 89 7. Authorize Purchase of Two Vehicle Maintenance Hoists 90-91 F. Second Consideration - Ordinance #548 - Amending Chapter 12: Subdivision 92-94 Regulations, Regarding Modifications from the 2014-2015 Subdivision Study G. Approve On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor License with Sunday Sales for Sushi X 95 H. Approve Requests for Beer and/or Wine for Brookview Park 96-97 I. Approve Extension for Submitting Final PUD Plan Application for Golden Villas at 98-99 9130 and 9220 Olson Memorial Highway - Golden Villas, LLC, Applicant J. Acceptance of Donation for Memorial Bench - Brookview Golf Course from Family of 100-101 Ron Chesen 15-27 K. Authorizing Transfer of$100,000 From the Building Improvement Fund to the Cable 102-103 Improvement Fund 15-28 L. Establish Temporary No Parking Zones for Humane Society Walk for Animals 15-29 104-108 M. Authorization to Amend 2013 Community Development Block Grant Agreement with 109-110 Hennepin County and Jewish Housing and Programming (J-HAP) 15-30 N. Resolution Supporting Making Improvements to the 36 inch pipe for Water Service 111-113 for the Joint Water Commission Cities 15-31 O. Receipt of February 2015 Financial Reports 114-122 P. Proclamation for 2015 Earth Day 123-124 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS 7 PM A. Public Hearing - Ordinance #550 - Final PUD Plan Central Park West PUD No. 121 - 125-343 1400 and 1500 State Highway 100 South, 5075 Wayzata Boulevard, 1511 Utica Avenue South - DLC Residential, LLC, Applicant B. Public Hearing - Ordinance #551 - Amending Section 11.21, Side Setbacks of 344-355 Principal Structures C. Public Hearing - Ordinance #552 - Amending Section 11.21, Subdivision 12 - Single 356-361 Family Zoning District (R-1), to Modify the Size of Accessory Structures Accessory Structures 5. OLD BUSINESS 6. NEW BUSINESS A. Approval of Plat - Central Park West PUD No. 121 and Authorization to Sign PUD 362-378 Permit and PUD Development Agreement - Central Park West PUD No. 121 15-32 B. Announcements of Meetings C. Mayor and Council Communications 7. ADJOURNMENT CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY MINNESOTA PROCLAMATION FOR GENOCIDE AWARENESS AND PREVENTION MONTH APRIL 2015 WHEREAS, the City of Golden Valley joins institutions around the world in recognizing the month of April as "Genocide Awareness and Prevention" month; and WHEREAS, those atrocities known as genocides originated in the dehumanization of groups of people by those who harbor intolerance, hatred, and violence; and WHEREAS, the City of Golden Valley supports the Golden Valley Human Rights Commission and other Human Rights Commissions in their efforts to provide opportunities for individuals and communities to have access to information and history concerning genocides; and WHEREAS, the City of Golden Valley supports the Golden Valley Human Rights Commission and other Human Rights Commissions in emphasizing the need to heighten public awareness of genocides and to honor all who have been victimized by genocide; and WHEREAS, many genocides stem from events that occurred during the month of April; now therefore, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Golden Valley does hereby proclaim the month of April 2015: "GENOCIDE AWARENESS AND PREVENTION MONTH" in tribute to all whose lives have been touched by genocide and as a reminder to practice vigilance over the protection of human rights and the prevention of the atrocities committed in the past. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the great seal of the City of Golden Valley to be affixed this 7th day of April 2015. Shepard M. Harris, Mayor UNOFFICIAL MINUTES STRATEGIC PLANNING RETREAT GOLDEN VALLEY, MINNESOTA February 5, 2015 The meeting began at 7 pm. The following members were present: Mayor Harris, Council Members Clausen, Fonnest, Schmidgall and Snope. Also present were: Thomas Burt, City Manager. Craig Rapp, Facilitator from Craig Rapp, LLC 1A. Craig Rapp, Facilitator from Craig Rapp, LLC, worked with Council regarding team building exercises. The meeting was adjourned at 9:30 pm. Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: Thomas D Burt, City Manager I if Ifs r�i 3 % UNOFFICIAL MINUTES STRATEGIC PLANNING RETREAT GOLDEN VALLEY, MINNESOTA February 23, 2015 The meeting began at 6:30 pm. The following members were present: Mayor Harris, Council Members Clausen, Fonnest, Schmidgall and Snope. Also present were: Thomas Burt, City Manager; Chantell Knauss, Assistant City Manager; Marc Nevinski, Physical Development Director; Stacy Carlson, Police Chief; John Crelly, Fire Chief; Sue Virnig, Finance Director; Rick Birno, Director of Parks and Recreation; Cheryl Weiler, Communication Manager, Jeff Oliver, City Engineer, Bert Tracy, Public Works Maintenance Manager. 1A. Staff presented the Asset and Infrastructure Report. The meeting was adjourned at 8:50 pm. Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: Thomas D Burt, City Manager I if Ifs r�i 3 % UNOFFICIAL MINUTES STRATEGIC PLANNING RETREAT GOLDEN VALLEY, MINNESOTA March 12, 2015 The meeting began at 7 pm. The following members were present: Mayor Harris, Council Members Clausen, Fonnest, Schmidgall and Snope. Also present were: Thomas Burt, City Manager; Chantell Knauss, Assistant City Manager; Marc Nevinski, Physical Development Director; Stacy Carlson, Police Chief; John Crelly, Fire Chief; Sue Virnig, Finance Director; Rick Birno, Director of Parks and Recreation; Cheryl Weiler, Communication Manager. Craig Rapp, Facilitator from Craig Rapp, LLC 1A. Craig Rapp, Facilitator from Craig Rapp, LLC, worked with Council and Staff reviewing the Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats (SWOT analysis). The meeting was adjourned at 9:50 pm. Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: Thomas D Burt, City Manager I if Ifs r�i 3 % UNOFFICIAL MINUTES CITY COUNCIL GOAL SETTING WORKSHOP GOLDEN VALLEY, MINNESOTA March 14, 2015 The meeting began at 9 am. The following members were present: Mayor Harris, Council Members Clausen, Fonnest, Schmidgall and Snope. Also present were: Thomas Burt, City Manager; Chantell Knauss, Assistant City Manager; Marc Nevinski, Physical Development Director; Stacy Carlson, Police Chief; John Crelly, Fire Chief; Sue Virnig, Finance Director; Rick Birno, Director of Parks and Recreation; Cheryl Weiler, Communication Manager. Craig Rapp, Facilitator from Craig Rapp, LLC 1A. Craig Rapp facilitated the meeting to further define the target goals from the Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats (SWOT) Analysis. The meeting was adjourned at 1:10 pm. Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: Thomas D. Burt, City Manager c(ty r UNOFFICIAL MINUTES (yol �' CITY COUNCIL MEETING GOLDEN VALLEY, MINNESOTA March 17, 2015 W I. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Harris called the meeting to order at 6:30 pm. 1A. Roll Call Present: Mayor Harris, Council Members Clausen, Schmidgall, and Fonnest Council Member Snope arrived at 6:50 pm. 1 B. Pledge of Allegiance 1 C. Board/Commission Oath of Office and Presentation of Certificate of Appointment Mayor Harris administered the Oath of Office and presented a Certificate of Appointment, city mug and pin to appoint Andrea Mac Arthur to the Human Services Fund. 1 D. 2014 Police Department Annual Report Chief Carlson presented the Police Department's 2014 Annual Report and answered questions from Council. 2. ADDITIONS AND CORRECTIONS TO AGENDA MOTION made by Council Member Fonnest, seconded by Council Member Clausen to approve the agenda of March 17, 2015, as revised with the addition of 6D-Authorization to sign amended PUD Permit for West Metro Surgical Center, the replacement of pages 93 & 133 of 4A-Public Hearing for Struthers Parkinson's Center, the addition of correspondence to 413-Public Hearing regarding the Zoning Code and Subdivision Text Amendments and to move 1 E-State of the City Presentation to 6G and the motion carried unanimously. 3. APPROVAL. OF CONSENT AGENDA MOTION made by Council Member Clausen, seconded by Council Member Fonnest to approve the consent agenda of March 17, 2015, as submitted and the motion carried unanimously. 3A. Approve Minutes of City Council Meeting - March 3, 2015 3131. Approve City Check Register and authorize the payments of the bills as submitted. 3C1. Authorize issuance of Multi-Family Rental Property licenses as recommended by staff. 3C2. Approve solicitor's license for Minnesota Public Interest Research Group. 3C3. Receive and file the gambling license exemption and approve the waiver of notice requirement for Meadowbrook Elementary School PTO. 3C4. Authorize issuance of General licenses as recommended by staff. 3D. Accept for filing the Minutes of Boards and Commissions as follows: 1. Planning Commission - February 23, 2015 2. Open Space and Recreation Commission - December 22, 2014 3. Human Service Fund - February 9, 2015 3E1. Award the Contract to Tim's Tree Service in the amount of $66,410 for the 2015 Spring Brush Pickup Program. Unofficial City Council Minutes -2- March 17, 2015 3. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA - continued 3E2. 1. Authorize contract with GMH Asphalt Corp., in the amount of$2,133,887.25 for the construction of the 2015 PMP, City Improvement Project No. 15-01. 2. Authorize entering into a contract with SEH, Inc. for observation, construction, staking, and engineering services for the 2015 PMP, not to exceed $181,000. 3. Motion to authorize purchase of fire hydrants from Dakota Supply Ground, Sioux Falls, South Dakota, in the amount of$83,970.00. 3F. Approve requests for beer and/or wine at Brookview Park as recommended by staff. 3G. Adopt Resolution 15-20 Appointing Stacy Hoschka as Commissioner and Jane McDonald Black as Alternate Commissioner to the Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission, and Jeff Oliver as Member and Eric Eckman as Alternate Member to its Technical Advisory Committee. 3H. Adopt on second consideration, Ordinance #545, Amending Section 4.31: Stormwater Management of the City Code. 31. Adopt Resolution 15-21 Calling for an Administrative Hearing on Alcohol Sales Violation- Pallop Ratnasingha (Owner) - Nong's Thai Cuisine. 3J. Receive and file the January 2015 Financial Reports. 3K. Approve Agreement for Organizational Management Consulting Services with Springsted, Inc. for the City Manager Executive Recruitment. 4. PUBLIC HEARING 4A. Public Hearing - Final PUD Plan for Struthers Parkinson's Center PUD No. 39, Amendment#4 - 6681 & 6701 Country Club Drive - Park Nicollet Methodist Hospital, Applicant Associate Planner Goellner presented the staff report and answered questions from Council. Mayor Harris opened the public hearing. No one came forward. Mayor Harris closed the public hearing. There was Council discussion regarding the Final PUD Plan for Struthers Parkinson's Center located at 6681 and 6701 Country Club Drive. MOTION made by Council Member Fonnest, seconded by Council Member Clausen to adopt Ordinance #546, Approval of Final PUD Plan, Struthers Parkinson's Center PUD No. 39, Amendment #4, Park Nicollet Methodist Hospital, Applicant with the amendments from the page replacements upon a vote being taken the following voted in favor of: Harris, Schmidgall, Snope, Fonnest and Clausen, the following voted against: none and the motion carried. 4B. Public Hearing - Zoning Code and Subdivision Code Text Amendments for Subdivisions and Planned Unit Developments with Single Family Residential Components Planning Manager Zimmerman presented the staff report and answered questions from Council. City Attorney Barnard and City Engineer Oliver answered questions from Council. Mayor Harris opened the public hearing. Unofficial City Council Minutes -3- March 17, 2015 4113. Public Hearing - Zoning Code and Subdivision Text Amendments - continued Mr. Paul Meland, 309 Meander Road, gave a brief history of his neighborhood and said the character of it has changed since he purchased his property. He said when he bought his property it was marketed as a sub-dividable lot, but added he does not plan to divide it. He said if this ordinance passes, an additional 10 lots could qualify to be subdivided, but if it does not only 3 lots would be eligible. He said it would be more effective if the minimum lot width increased. He said if the current ordinance was in place, but the lot width increased to 100 feet, it would cut the number of lots that qualify in half. He said if the width change does not occur, and the lots around him are subdivided, it would have a negative financial impact on him in the future. Ms. Diane Richard, 217 Paisley Lane, said she would like to preserve the character of her neighborhood and asked how lot subdivisions fit into the City's Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Leroy Hagel, 200 Cutacross Road, said he and his wife have lived in their neighborhood for over 60 years and hate to see what has happened to it. He said he has written many letters to the Council stating he is against the subdivisions in Tralee. He said the new homes built across the street from him appear to be the result of some type of clever surveying similar to fitting puzzle pieces into a puzzle, because they do not line up with the others on the street. He said he would like to save what remains of his neighborhood and stop any further subdivisions in it. He said in years to come the older homes will be knocked down and bigger homes will be built in their place. He said these new homes will rival the finance benefit for the City as from subdividing the lots. He asked why allow a special neighborhood to be destroyed by subdivisions. Ms. Hattie Bonds, 425 Sunnyridge Lane, said she is concerned about the ecosystem in her neighborhood and wondered what was under the soil. She asked if a bedrock study had been done and if she could see it. Ms. Eva Jensen, 4010 Roanoke Circle, said she is concerned about the two tier proposal for the lot sizes. She said the minimum lower tier of 10,000 square feet is too small. She said it should be 12,000 square feet. She said she agreed with revising the minimum lot width size. She said setbacks should be set so homes could not be approved on lots that are too small. Mr. David Knaeble, 221 Sunnyridge Lane, said the study was not really a study, but a poll of the people who attended the meetings. He said he thought the study would have been more scientific and would involve the whole City. He said the recommendations reflected that of the loudest complainers at the meetings and did not look at the pros and cons of subdividing, only the cons. He stated some of the pros of subdividing are: added revenue, increased population, and increased variety of homes available in the City. He said these types of developments are very green, since they do not require roads or utilities to be built. He read through a list of questions that he submitted at the meeting. Mr. Matt Pavek, 510 Cloverleaf Drive, said he agreed with what Mr. Knaeble said and that all of the people being affected by the changes have not weighed in. He said residents would be losing money if they are unable to subdivide their lots. He said he would like to hear a discussion about lot sizes in general and even he, who works in the field, could not tell the difference between lot sizes if he were walking down the street. He said if the rules are changed for this reason, it would be a shame because most people may not even notice. Unofficial City Council Minutes -4- March 17, 2015 4B. Public Hearing - Zoning Code and Subdivision Text Amendments - continued Ms. Christine Pavek, 513 Meadow Lane, she said she was unaware of the survey and lives within the Tralee neighborhood area. She said that the younger population was not being represented and added she would not have been able to afford a home on the larger lots. Ms. Kathy Watkins, 112 Paisley Lane, said she understands the argument that people should be able to do with their property what they would like to within the guidelines of the City. She said in her neighborhood though, the developers are not the end homeowners and are just interested in making a quick buck and then leaving. She said the developers are building homes that no one can afford and some have become troubled properties. She said she would not be opposed to what Mr. Meland recommended about the minimum lot size requirement. She said she hoped that this ordinance passed. Mr. Casey Pavek, 513 Meadow Lane North, said he bought his home a couple of years ago knowing he and his wife could grow into it. He said they received a great value for the house because it was bank owned and did not have a garage. He said he appreciates having density in housing in his neighborhood and hopes for more neighbors. He said a new two story house was built on the lot next to his and thought if a two story house could be built there that maybe in 10 to 20 years when he can afford it he may do the same. He said because of this study, it appears he may not be able to improve his current home, build a garage or eventually tear down his smaller home to build a larger one unless it looked like a wedding cake. He said this change was just because of a few people and not the entire City which makes him nervous about the future of his property. Mr. Mark Deitz, 207 Sunnyridge Lane, said one of the issues regarding the study was that the consultants discussed the possibility of changing the minimum size to 15,000 square, but he did not see it in the recommendations. Ms. Elizabeth Schultz, 1520 Gettysburg Avenue, said she would like to stay in Golden Valley but found it is hard to find a newer home with a smaller lot. She said she hopes that more homes will be built on smaller lots. Mayor Harris closed the public hearing. There was much Council discussion regarding the amendments for Subdivisions and Planned Unit Developments with Single Family Residential Components. MOTION made by Council Member Clausen, seconded by Council Member Fonnest to adopt Ordinance #547, Amending Chapter 11: Land Use Regulation (Zoning), Regarding Modifications from the 2014-2015 Subdivision Study upon a vote being taken the following voted in favor of: Harris, Fonnest and Clausen, the following voted against: Schmidgall and Snope and the motion carried. MOTION made by Council Member Fonnest, seconded by Council Member Clausen to adopt upon first consideration Ordinance #548, Amending Chapter 12: Subdivision Regulations (Platting), Regarding Modifications from the 2014-2015 Subdivision Study upon a vote being taken the following voted in favor of: Harris Fonnest and Clausen, the following voted against: Schmidgall and Snope and the motion carried. Unofficial City Council Minutes -5- March 17, 2015 4C. Public Hearing - Amending Section 11.21, Height and Side Yard Setbacks Planning Manager Zimmerman presented the staff report and answered questions from Council. Mayor Harris opened the public hearing. No one came forward. Mayor Harris closed the public hearing. MOTION made by Council Member Fonnest, seconded by Council Member Clausen to continue this public hearing to the April 7, 2015, City Council meeting and the motion carried unanimously. Q. Resolution - Special Assessments - 2015 Pavement Management Area Finance Director Virnig presented the staff report and answered questions from Council. City Engineer Oliver answered questions from Council. Mayor Harris opened the public hearing. Mr. Daniel Moran, 1405 Flag Avenue, inquired if the project it was for both street and sewer repairs. Ms. Elizabeth Schultz, 1520 Gettysburg Avenue, said she received a notification regarding pipeline safety which asked to access her pipelines and wanted to know if it was related to this. Mayor Harris closed the public hearing. MOTION made by Council Member Clausen, seconded by Council Member Fonnest to adopt Resolution 15-22, Adopting and Confirming Assessments for Various Public Improvements in the 2015 Pavement Management Area upon a vote being taken the following voted in favor of: Harris, Schmidgall, Snope, Clausen and Fonnest, the following voted against: none and the motion carried. 4E. Resolution - Special Assessments - 2016 Pavement Management Area Finance Director Virnig presented the staff report and answered questions from Council. Mayor Harris opened the public hearing. No one came forward. Mayor Harris closed the public hearing. MOTION made by Council Member Fonnest, seconded by Council Member Clausen to adopt Resolution 15-23, Adopting and Confirming Assessments for Various Public Improvements in the 2016 Pavement Management Area upon a vote being taken the following voted in favor of: Harris, Schmidgall, Snope, Clausen and Fonnest, the following voted against: none and the motion carried. Unofficial City Council Minutes -6- March 17, 2015 4F. Resolution - Special Assessments - 2017 Pavement Management Area Finance Director Virnig presented the staff report and answered questions from Council. Mayor Harris opened the public hearing. No one came forward. Mayor Harris closed the public hearing. MOTION made by Council Member Snope, seconded Council Member Clausen to receive and file a letter submitted at the meeting to Finance Director Virnig from Mr. Laurent at 1532 Mendelssohn Avenue North regarding his concerns on the 2017 Pavement Management project and the motion carried. MOTION made by Council Member Fonnest, seconded by Council Member Clausen adopt Resolution 15-24, Adopting and Confirming Assessments for Various Public Improvements in the 2017 Pavement Management Area upon a vote being taken the following voted in favor of: Harris, Schmidgall, Snope, Clausen and Fonnest, the following voted against: none and the motion carried. 6. NEW BUSINESS 6A. Joint Powers Agreement for the Sochacki Park, Mary Hills and Rice Lake Nature Area Regional Park Development Project Director of Parks and Recreation Birno presented the staff report and answered questions from Council. Three Rivers Park Board Commissioner Daniel Freeman said the Three Rivers Park District has been in service for over 60 years. He said that Hennepin County currently does not have a park in the inner ring suburbs and with this agreement it will be an opportunity to give a good park experience to the residents who have paid for it for decades. He thanked the staff from Golden Valley, Robbinsdale and the Three Rivers Park District for their efforts in the agreement. Three Rivers Park Associate Superintendent Jonathan Vlaming said his staff is very excited about this agreement. He said in the short term the plan is to complete paving the trails throughout the park. He said the Park District will be exploring the idea of adding an interactive park experience and will be talking to the public regarding what they envision for the park. He said they are planning to provide programs and environmental education. He said he would like to have a party at the park in June for the public and answered questions from Council. Council thanked the Three Rivers Park District and the Park and Recreation staff for their work on the Joint Powers Agreement. MOTION made by Council Member Clausen, seconded by Council Member Snope to adopt Resolution 15-25 authorizing the Joint Powers Agreement with Three Rivers Park District and the City of Robbinsdale upon a vote being taken the following voted in favor of: Harris, Snope, Clausen, Fonnest and Schmidgall, the following voted against: none and the motion carried. Unofficial City Council Minutes -7- March 17, 2015 6B. Adding a Month to the Six-Month Moratorium on Subdivisions and Planned Unit Developments that include Single Family Residential Components Planning Manager Zimmerman presented the staff report and answered questions from Council. There was Council discussion regarding adding a month to the existing six-month moratorium on Subdivisions and Planned Unit Developments with a Single Family Residential Component. MOTION made by Council Member Fonnest, seconded by Council Member Clausen to adopt Ordinance #549 adding a Month to the Six-Month Moratorium on Subdivisions and Planned Unit Developments that include Single Family Residential Components upon a vote being taken the following voted in favor of: Harris, Fonnest, Snope and Clausen, the following voted against: Schmidgall and the motion carried. 6C. METRO Blue line Extension Update Planning Manager Zimmerman presented the staff report and answered questions from Council. MOTION made by Council Member Snope, seconded by Council Member Fonnest to receive and file METRO Blue Line Extension Update and the motion carried unanimously. 6D. Authorization to Sign Amended PUD Permit - West Metro Surgical Center PUD No. 39 (Struthers Parkinson's Center) - Amendment No. 4 Planning Manager Zimmerman presented the staff report and answered questions from Council. MOTION made by Council Member Fonnest, seconded by Council Member Clausen to authorize the Mayor and City Manager to sign the amended PUD Permit for West Metro Surgical Center PUD No. 39, Amendment No. 4 and the motion carried unanimously. 6E. Announcement of Meetings Some Council Members may attend the Twin Lake Alum Treatment Open House on March 19, 2015, from 6:30 pm to 8 pm in the Council Chambers. Some Council Members may attend the Caring Youth Recognition event on March 19, 2015, at 7 pm at the Minnetonka Community Center. The State of the City Community Update will be held on March 20, 2015, at 7:30 am. Some Council Members may attend the Golden Valley Historical Society event "Antique Appraisal Show" on March 28, 2015, from 2 to 4 pm at the Heather's Manor. A Tri-City Council Meeting regarding the Joint Water Commission will be held on March 31, 2015, at 6 pm in the Council Chambers Unofficial City Council Minutes -8- March 17, 2015 6E. Announcement of Meetings - continued Some Council Members may attend a Legislative Meeting on March 24, 2015, at 6 pm at the Theodore Wirth Chalet. The next City Council Meeting will be held on April 7, 2015, at 6:30 pm. 6F. Mayor and Council Communication Mayor Harris discussed a letter regarding the City's support of Governor Dayton's proposed Transportation Budget and asked if Council was comfortable with it. Council Member Snope updated Council on the purchase agreement that Hennepin County has on property that was to be used to form construction of the railroad connector track. Council Member Clausen updated Council on a meeting she attended with Congressman Keith Ellison regarding the railroad connector track being proposed in the City of Crystal. Council Member Schmidgall stated that two of the best 100 Companies to work according to Fortune Magazine are located in Golden Valley; Allianz Life Insurance Company and General Mills. 6G. State of the City Presentation The State of the City video presentation was shown. 7. Adjournment MOTION made by Council Member Snope, seconded by Council Member Clausen, and the motion carried unanimously to adjourn the meeting at 9:51 pm. Shepard Harris, Mayor ATTEST: Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk #..# '? oY b � cyolde" n. _.. n inti wd valley Finance Department 763-593-8013/763-593-8109(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting April 7, 2015 Agenda Item 3. B. 1. Approval of City Check Register Prepared By Sue Virnig, Finance Director Summary Approval of the check register for various vendor claims against the City of Golden Valley. Attachments • Document sent via email Recommended Action Motion to authorize the payment of the bills as submitted. w -f t i valley Finance Department 763-593-8013/763-593-8109(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting April 7, 2015 Agenda Item 3. B. 2. Approval of Housing and Redevelopment Authority Check Register Prepared By Sue Virnig, Finance Director Summary Approval of the check register for various vendor claims against the Housing and Redevelopment Authority. Attachments • Document sent via email Recommended Action Motion to authorize the payment of the bills as submitted. city of vik goldc' n MEMORANDUM valley City Administration/Council 763-593-3991 /763-593-8109(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting April 7, 2015 Agenda Item 3. C. 1. Gambling License Exemption and Waiver of Notice Requirement- Fundraising Bankers Prepared By Judy Nally, Administrative Assistant Summary As per State Statute organizations that conduct gambling within the City limits have to submit an application for a lawful gambling permit to the State after the permit has been approved or denied by the City. Depending upon the timing of the permit the applicants may request the City to waive the 30-day waiting period. Attachments • Application for Exempt Permit (2 pages) Recommended Action Motion to receive and file the gambling license exemption and approve the waiver of notice requirement for the Fundraising Bankers. MINNESOTA LAWFUL GAMBLING 8/14 LG220 Application for Exempt Permit Page 1 of 2 Anexempt permit may be issued to a nonprofit organization that: Application fee (nonrefundable) . conducts lawful gambling on five or fewer days,and If the application is postmarked or received . awards less than $50,000 in prizes during a calendar year. 30 days or more before the event,the application If total prize value for the year will be$1,500 or less,contact the Licensing fee is $50; otherwise the fee is $100. Specialist assigned to your county. Organization information Organization Name: Previous Gambling Permit Number: Fundraising Bankers Minnesota Tax ID Number, if any: Federal Employer ID Number(FEIN), if any: 264826194 Type of Nonprofit Organization (check one): Fratemal Religious Veterans aOther Nonprofit Organization Mailing Address: City: State and Zip: County: 10846 Buchanan St. NE Blaine MN Anoka Name of Chief Executive Officer(CEO): Daytime Phone: Email: Timothy Barreft 952-540-8363 flmothybarreftft ishan Nonprofit Status �C�m Attach a copy of ONE of the following for proof of nonprofit status: Nonprofit Articles of Incorporation OR a current Certificate of Good Standing. .Don't have a copy? This certificate must be obtained each year from: Minnesota Secretary of State Business Services Division 60 Empire Drive, Suite 100 St. Paul, MN 55103 Phone: 651-296-2803 IRS income tax exemption (501(c)) letter in your organization's name. Don't have a copy? To obtain a copy of your federal income tax exempt letter, have an organization officer contact the IRS at 877-829-5500. IRS-Affiliate of national,statewide,or International parent nonprofit organization (charter). If your organization falls under a parent organization,attach copies of both of the following: a. an IRS letter showing your parent organization is a nonprofit 501(c) organization with a group ruling, and b. the charter or letter from your parent organization recognizing your organization as a subordinate. Gambling Premises Information Name of premises where the gambling event will be conducted (for raffles, list the site where the drawing will take place): Brookview Golf Golf Address (do not use PO box): City or Township: Zip Code: County: 200 Brookview Parkway Golden Valley 55426 Henne in Date(s)of activity (for raffles, indicate the date of the drawing): June 1st 2015 Check each type of gambling activity that your organization will conduct: Bingo* =Paddlewheels* =Pull-Tabs* =Tipboards* Raffle(total value of raffle prizes awarded for the year: $2,500 ) *Gambling equipment for bingo paper, paddlewheels, pull-tabs, and tipboards must be obtained from a distributor licensed by the Minnesota Gambling Control Board. EXCEPTION: Bingo hard cards and bingo number selection devices may be borrowed from another organization authorized to conduct bingo. To find a licensed distributor, go to www.mn.gov/gcb and click on Distributors under the LIST OF LICENSEES, or call 651-539-1900. i i 0/14 P 2 of 2 L+OW1 UAtt Ot iioirOfl1:mmt AdMOWIftt1r Wt CI<7'YlIS#)NROtrau IDt71l�lflt7r 11 ►11L fWa:ptttllli ;P' lbra_�P ip�lilrll�tll ff mew■-- d Ila no pk*w opplim on k omrMO O wah rio vmft a putssd• 30-ft I sppdW w k Odmovdad0ed With a 30-ORY wail appy i ii M Iad w a after ae0 Mows the Board to Ow•PVT*IW 30 dsya ward (, days fbr a ist cbm tom. apP .k dlankd. - Valley TNteD t»!S lute» Deb!' y,,, bvvw 0001. on t1lW of the bwodm ,I S*M V*ft OW it appA►I for=wjpW ggmWb+Ii s Y wido the twori dp igniha. (A torrnahlp IIO 110 etall�ot1►auawrlhrtA staff� darty►an appiicadtor►,tom'mm.swubN6 eaolbm 949.166.) I WIIt of gova 0 not mmt at". Print TOwr w"me: �naWrd d TawM+lp:Otlloart Tool. Datil. Chi _ Exac�Itlwe oM��-�iOfnat�tln� � prlJvided k ttps appiicsNon is„..T.: acaratea to tha -rnl►bwwledpe. I admowNdge tint the finendst rft cpaanl,raarted to daysnWOWS sguftnai EPidint Dabr• �- Timoft awreft + spoatlw,tiler Arasedat r�rMtr ata11 ` en two tie rnsra consaoudw drtys,or Atutandat spat lbrrir asa�vae; w1M tre cant wNh yo0r . all 9oadoti0sd pwnt or we the eralUle W-In ttm fvsb"§rt • aN o�rdudtiid o�n:ona day. poy sppNottlon is Ir ala or more raffle*00*0 soe wWw.mn.ao+r/�1r. coed en the taatlre day. 11Yhhin 30 dNa 4ftha avant Ot%aomoft end iMs. the tiaWoft }haiKkl"ROOrtlbrm Ao tila tiWrlbgna t7aNra1 ttlo�d. hair �,Qryollr proof'df ttolyeetftt and � mv�bap aN rarr+at raf�+e mind+,a1a'Is for tye(lionrbritaadrbte):. If tiffs apoftoon is 8-i{t Y no 9Urtuso,saWon f�P.Li6,r+wbd. H nr raodw d 9d days or.— before the rmitr SOON,atbn ttla.Is M a Ww”the tee k#1110. Mattie .CM4r ft LjoWg"t %tbn of Ow t7antnol Board at plyabi to fMw>rbtt Of 1 661-09-1900. t7ontroi Gond r[1Ns than wA be romoo a wom in a beraatlrre tbrtaat%&WOO • i rYfatR QolW1q►f#ead B�Softie�S+aptt prMt,9i#Ma)� !#t It5Yi3 . Yon�roegS.nWneand nwadtkdMe ;latian�q►0lreral; DMa notbe:iht d ad&"0 w1Mn rooHwd re.,fwy a on thk G�arMr al'��M�tiAH.�used adOr.w�be pubec MM�amMdOh. t3onbei eoird .w pis�fi abouk Innar+ onaW NOW Ii, sal be psomb agMtrs in coed Mnler a vNaen dosid iisileit np�o0o�!!:!Oisai by aoart *w ai+yMi�s-Imthe.4phtto the paiinit,aM p niM bsoome a0�1 atlNr idlNduW Wed a ural�p illoNli! n wpplp InAprnlNtlonhorr m,tr public. tfthetloMd.doarnatY�wa d tioav e0 ft . qw iefnnlr�lon prOMd�d wblda lwr ac Miplt at+d�r auihoHnta aew uss a >b Aoad mry abk o soae0tlon bf your arae Ipotlone oad, eWt MAild;erifl ice• Mr1e0 bf bdbwnstlon�Iblr thirnetlde was. ase mw sMise to ariue a psr;nit• about tras'ppdietlootis awlr6le tio-tleerd a+w�;a;d ee�o e Ift ymm,wrNtm conard, tf ibCorlrte�e n�n�ba4 loerditdt rdioal wierk rgides. , the tti oosrd a to proosa the saae;to the Mrbnaobloei MaunyobR"Y be0aty Citi, of514 goldet'l MEMORANDUM valley City Administration/ Council 763-593-3991 /763-593-8109(fax) N,""A Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting April 7, 2015 Agenda Item 3. C. 2. Gambling License Exemption and Waiver of Notice Requirement - Sons of the American Legion Post 523 Prepared By Judy Nally, Administrative Assistant Summary As per State Statute organizations that conduct gambling within the City limits have to submit an application for a lawful gambling permit to the State after the permit has been approved or denied by the City. Depending upon the timing of the permit the applicants may request the City to waive the 30-day waiting period. Attachments • Application for Exempt Permit (4 pages) Recommended Action Motion to receive and file the gambling license exemption and approve the waiver of notice requirement for the Sons of the American Legion Post 523. MINNESOTA LAWFUL GAMBLING 8/14 LG220 Application for Exempt Permit Page 1 of An exempt permit may be issued to a nonprofit organization that: Application fee (nonrefundable) . conducts lawful gambling on five or fewer days,and If the application is postmarked or received • awards less than$50,000 in prizes during a calendar year. 30 days or more before the event,the application If total prize value for the year will be$1,500 or less,contact the Licensing fee is$50;otherwise the fee is$100. Specialist assigned to your county. Organization Information Organization Name: Previous Gambling Permit Number: SONS OF THE AMERICAN LEGION POST 523 Minnesota Tax ID Number, if any: Federal Employer ID Number(FEIN), if any: Type of Nonprofit Organization (chedc one): Fratemal Religious M Veterans =Other Nonprofit Organization Mailing Address: City: State and Zip: County: 1841 PENNSYLAVINA AVE SO. ST LOUIS PARK MN 55426 HENN Name of Chief Executive Officer(CEO): Daytime Phone: Emall.- DAVID JENKINS Nonprofit Status Attach a copy of ONE of the following for proof of nonprofit status: Nonprofit Articles of incorporation OR a current Certificate of Good Standing. Don't have a copy? This certificate must be obtained each year from: Minnesota Secretary of State Business Services Division 60 Empire Drive, Suite 100 St. Paul, MN 55103 Phone: 651-296-2803 IRS income tax exemption (501(c)) letter in your organization's name. Don't have a copy? To obtain a copy of your federal income tax exempt letter, have an organization officer contact the IRS at 877-829-5500. IRS-Affiliate of national,statewide,or international parent nonprofit organization (charter). If your organization falls under a parent organization, attach copies of both of the following: a. an IRS letter showing your parent organization is a nonprofit 501(c) organization with a group ruling, and b. the charter or letter from your parent organization recognizing your organization as a subordinate. Gambling Premises Information Name of premises where the gambling event will be conducted (for raffles, list the site where the drawing will take place): CHESTER BIRD AMERICAN LEGION POST 523 Address(do not use PO box): City or Township: Zip Code: County: 200 NORTH LILAC DRIVE GOLDEN VALLEY- 55422 HENN Date(s) of activity(for raffles, indicate the date of the drawing): NOV. 20 2015 Check each type of gambling activity that your organization will conduct: 19Bingo* =Paddlewheels* =Pull-Tabs* =Tipboards* Raffle (total value of raffle prizes awarded for the year:$ *Gambling equipment for bingo paper, paddlewheels, pull-tabs, and tipboards must be obtained from a distributor licensed by the Minnesota Gambling Control Board. EXCEPTION: Bingo hard cards and bingo number selection devices may be borrowed from another organization authorized to conduct bingo. To find a licensed distributor, go to www.mn.gov/gcb and click on Distributors under the LIST OF LICENSEES, or call 651-539-1900. LG220 Application for Exempt Permit 8/14 Page 2 of 2 Local Unit of Government Acknowledgment CITY APPROVAL COUNTY APPROVAL for a gambling premises for a gambling premises located within city limits located in a township The application is acknowledged with no waiting period, FP30 application is acknowledged with no waiting period. The application is acknowledged with a 30-day waitingapplication is acknowledged with a 30-day waiting period, and allows the Board to issue a permit after 30 daysod, and allows the Board to issue a permit after (60 days for a 1st class city). days. The applicatiopisdepiied. f/ application is denied. Pnnt City Name: I�JW`L Y u nty Name: Si at a of ity P Signature of County Personnel: 7- Title ADate: �Z Title: Date: TOWNSHIP(if required by the county). On behalf of the township, I acknowledge that the organization is applying for exempted gambling activity within the township limits. (A township has no statutory authority to approve or Local unit of government must sign. deny an application, per Minn.Statutes,section 349.166.) Print Township Name: Signature of Township Officer: Title: Date: Chief Executive Officer's Signature The information provided in this application is complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge. I acknowledge that the financial report will be completed and returned to a Board wit 3�days of the event date. Chief Executive Officer's Signature: �f Date: 3-12-2015 Print Name: DAVID JENKINS Requirements Complete a separate application for: Financial report and recordkeeping required. • all gambling conducted on two or more consecutive days, or A financial report form and instructions will be sent with your • all gambling conducted on one day. permit,or use the online fill-in form available at Only one application is required if one or more raffle drawings are www.mn.gov/gcb. conducted on the same day. Within 30 days of the event date,complete and return the Send application with: financial report form to the Gambling Control Board. Your a copy of your proof of nonprofit status, and organization must keep all exempt raffle records and reports for application fee(nonrefundable). If the application is 3-1/2 years(Minn.Statutes,section 349.166,subd. 2(f)). postmarked or received 30 days or more before the event, the application fee is$50; otherwise the fee is$100. Make Questions? check payable to State of Minnesota. Call the Licensing Section of the Gambling Control Board at 651-539-1900. To: Gambling Control Board This form will be made available in alternative format(i.e. large 1711 West County Road B,Suite 300 South Roseville, MN 55113 print,Braille) upon request. Data privacy notice: The information requested application. Your organization's name and ment of Public Safety;Attorney General; on this form(and any attachments)will be used address will be public information when received Commissioners of Administration,Minnesota by the Gambling Control Board (Board)to by the Board. All other information provided will Management tic Budget,and Revenue;Legislative determine your organization's qualifications to be private data about your organization until the Auditor,national and International gambling be involved In lawful gambling activities In Board Issues the permit. When the Board Issues regulatory agencies;anyone pursuant to court Minnesota. Your organization has the right to the permit,all information provided will become order;other individuals and agencies specifically refuse to supply the information;however,If public. If the Board does not issue a permit,all authorized by state or federal law to have access your organization refuses to supply this information provided remains private,with the to the information; individuals and agencies for Information,the Board may not be able to exception of your organization's name and which law or legal order authorizes a new use or determine your organization's qualifications and, address which will remain public. Private data sharing of Information after this notice was as a consequence,may refuse to issue a permit. about your organization are available to Board given;and anyone with your written consent. If your organization supplies the information members,Board staff whose work requires requested,the Board will be able to process the access to the information; Minnesota's Depart- MINNESOTA LAWFUL GAMBLING 8/14 LG220 Application for Exempt Permit Page 1 of 2 An exempt permit may be issued to a nonprofit organization that: Application fee (nonrefundable) • conducts lawful gambling on five or fewer days,and If the application is postmarked or received • awards less than$50,000 in prizes during a calendar year. 30 days or more before the event,the application If total prize value for the year will be$1,500 or less, contact the Licensing fee is$50;otherwise the fee is$100. Specialist assigned to your county. Organization Information Organization Name: Previous Gambling Permit Number: SONS OF THE AMERICAN LEGION POST 523 Minnesota Tax ID Number, if any: Federal Employer ID Number(FEIN), if any: Type of Nonprofit Organization (check one): Fraternal a Religious Veterans aOther Nonprofit Organization Mailing Address: City: State and Zip: County: 1841 PENNSYLAVINA AVE SO. ST LOUIS PARK MN 55426 HENN Name of Chief Executive Officer(CEO): Daytime Phone: Email: DAVID JENKINS Nonprofit Status Attach a copy of ONE of the following for proof of nonprofit status: 1_71Nonprofit Articles of Incorporation OR a current Certificate of Good Standing. Don't have a copy? This certificate must be obtained each year from: Minnesota Secretary of State Business Services Division 60 Empire Drive, Suite 100 St. Paul, MN 55103 Phone: 651-296-2803 IRS income tax exemption (501(c)) letter in your organization's name. Don't have a copy? To obtain a copy of your federal income tax exempt letter, have an organization officer contact the IRS at 877-829-5500. IRS-Affiliate of national,statewide,or international parent nonprofit organization (charter). If your organization falls under a parent organization,attach copies of both of the following: a. an IRS letter showing your parent organization is a nonprofit 501(c) organization with a group ruling, and b. the charter or letter from your parent organization recognizing your organization as a subordinate. Gambling Premises Information Name of premises where the gambling event will be conducted (for raffles, list the site where the drawing will take place): CHESTER BIRD AMERICAN LEGION POST 523 Address(do not use PO box): City or Township: Zip Code: County: -200 NORTH LILAC DRIVE GOLDEN VALLEY 55422 HENN Date(s) of activity(for raffles, indicate the date of the drawing): JUNE 20 2015 Check each type of gambling activity that your organization will conduct: EIBingo* =Paddlewheels* =Pull-Tabs* =Tipboards* Raffle (total value of raffle prizes awarded for the year: $1200.00 *Gambling equipment for bingo paper, paddlewheels, pull-tabs, and tipboards must be obtained from a distributor licensed by the Minnesota Gambling Control Board. EXCEPTION: Bingo hard cards and bingo number selection devices may be borrowed from another organization authorized to conduct bingo. To find a licensed distributor, go to www.mn.gov/gcb and click on Distributors under the LIST OF LICENSEES, or call 651-539-1900. LG220 Application for Exempt Permit 8/14 Page 2 of 2 Local Unit of Government Acknowledgment CITY APPROVAL COUNTY APPROVAL for a gambling premises for a gambling premises located within city limits located in a township The application is acknowledged with no waiting period. a application is acknowledged with no waiting period. The application is acknowledged with a 30-day waiting a application is acknowledged with a 30-day waiting period, and allows the Board to issue a permit after 30 days period, and allows the Board to issue a permit after (60 days for a 1st class city). 30 days. The applicatioJj��is denied. +/ // a application is denied. Print City Name: vD�l�t Adell ✓ �+ ` Print County Name: Si at re o City�nl Signature of County Personnel: Date: l`s' Title: Date: TOWNSHIP(if required by the county). On behalf of the township,I acknowledge that the organization is applying for exempted gambling activity within the township limits. (A township has no statutory authority to approve or Local unit of government must sign. deny an application, per Minn.Statutes,section 349.166.) Print Township Name: Signature of Township Officer: Title: Date Chief Executive Officer's Signature The information provided in this application is complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge. I acknowledge that the financial report will be completed and returned to th Boar wi 30 days of the event date. Chief Executive Officer's Signature: , Date: 3-12-2015 Print Name: DAVID JENKINS Requirements Complete a separate application for: Financial report and recordkeeping required. . all gambling conducted on two or more consecutive days,or A financial report form and instructions will be sent with your . all gambling conducted on one day. permit,or use the online fill-in form available at Only one application is required if one or more raffle drawings are www.mn.gov/gcb. conducted on the same day. Within 30 days of the event date,complete and return the Send application with: financial report form to the Gambling Control Board. Your a copy of your proof of nonprofit status,and organization must keep all exempt raffle records and reports for application fee(nonrefundable). If the application is 3-1/2 years(Minn. Statutes,section 349.166, subd. 2(f)). postmarked or received 30 days or more before the event, the application fee is$50; otherwise the fee is$100. Make Questions? check payable to State of Ninnesota. Call the Licensing Section of the Gambling Control Board at 651-539-1900. To: Gambling Control Board This form will be made available in alternative format(i.e. large 1711 West County Road B,Suite 300 South Roseville,MN 55113 print,Braille) upon request. Data privacy notice: The information requested application. Your organization's name and ment of Public Safety;Attorney General; on this form(and any attachments)will be used address will be public information when received Commissioners of Administration,Minnesota by the Gambling Control Board(Board)to by the Board. All other Infomwtion provided will Management&Budget,and Revenue;Legislative determine your organization's qualifications to be private data about your organization until the Auditor,national and international gambling be involved in lawful gambling activities in Board issues the permit. When the Board issues regulatory agencies;anyone pursuant to court Minnesota. Your organization has the right to the permit,all information provided will become order;other Individuals and agencies specifically refuse to supply the information;however,if public. If the Board does not issue a permit,all authorized by state or federal law to have access your organization refuses to supply this information provided remains private,with the to the information; individuals and agencies for information,the Board may not be able to exception of your organization's name and which law or legal order authorizes a new use or determine your organization's qualifications and, address which will remain public. Private data sharing of information after this notice was as a consequence,may refuse to issue a permit. about your organization are available to Board given;and anyone with your written consent. If your organization supplies the information members,Board staff whose work requires requested,the Board will be able to process the access to the Information; Minnesota's Depart- city of 11 a MEMORANDUMgoldM valley City Administration/Council 763-593-3991 /763-593-8109(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting April 7, 2015 Agenda Item 3. C. 3. Solicitor's License -James Hardie Building Products Prepared By Judy Nally, Administrative Assistant Summary As per City Code, any individual or group intending to go door-to-door within the City selling products, taking orders or soliciting for business or donations must be licensed by the City to do SO. Attachments • Peddler/Solicitor License Application (2 pages) Recommended Action Motion to approve the solicitor's license for James Hardie Building Products. Application and fee must be submitted to the City Manager's Office the Wednesday prior to the City Council Meeting. Council Meetings are normally held the first and third Tuesday of each month. PEDDLER/SOLICITOR LICENSE APPLICATION 'TQ TO: Golden Valley City Council Fee Paid: $ 7800 Golden Valley Road Number of Persons: Golden Valley, MN 55427 Type of License: Peddler olicitor (circle Enclose the sum of$ for (number) peddlers/solicitors as required by City Code of the City of Golden Valley and have complied with all the requirements of said Code necessary for obtaining this license. C-rk'e-5. " (Business or Individual Name or Organization-to be Licensed) FLY._ 035 c, S_ MN Business ID Federal Business ID (FEIN) Define Business (Corporation, Prollrietorship, Partnership, Non-Profit, State of Inco oration or Individual 1 '2 3 [ S L-�s mil 1 S+ C G.,r (Address) Ck., ( -5C, 11, ( ®cG City, State an Zip Code) 317 rev - 2 � � (Telephone Number, including Area Code) NOW, THEREFORE, f\ a-Z a hereby makes application for (Appli ant Name) period ofZ5 i� through 12/31/x, subject to the conditions and provisions of said City Code. (Signature of Applican ri ipal Officer) Description of goods or services for sale (include prices) or indicate if soliciting donations. If more space is needed, attach additional sheets (be specific): r NOTE: If the products for sale are changed or modified, you must give the City complete information regarding such change or modification. List the names and addresses of EACH person who will be peddling or soliciting on behalf of said organization in the City, or, in the alternative, the name, address and telephone number or numbers where a responsible person of said organization will maintain a list of names and addresses of all persons engaged in peddling or soliciting in the City: 66-0 --' -7.� - (If more space is needed, attach additional sheets) STATE OF/YI1N`ZsC ) SS. COUNTY OF Pf/U jVtP/0) 1, ;�V of (Officer/I M i ual) (Name of Organization) being first duly sworn, depose and say that all the foregoing information is true to his/her own knowledge except as to matters therein stated on information and belief, and as to such matters, he/she believes them to be true. Siq�at re of Applicant/Principal Officerf Subscrl'bed and sworn to before me this day of , 201 S (Signature) r JUDITH A. NALLY ` NOTARY PUSUC-MINNESOTA 3 My Commission Expires w January 81,2020 ■ City o valley Fire Department 763-593-8079/763-593-8098(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting April 7, 2015 Agenda Item 3. C. 4. General Business Licenses Prepared By Jill Lund, Administrative Assistant Summary As per City Code, some businesses are required to be licensed by the City. Listed below are the Applicant, License Type and Fee of those who have submitted an application for approval. Linn Retail Centers, Inc. Gas Station/6 Dispensers $ 400.00 DBA: Holiday Station 600 Boone Avenue North Mobile Radio Engineering Gas Station/1 Dispenser $ 75.00 745 Boone Avenue North Mainline Transportation, Inc. Gas Station/4 Dispensers $ 300.00 835 Decatur Avenue North Jim Lupient Oldsmobile Gas Station/1 Dispenser $ 75.00 7100 Wayzata Boulevard Feist Automotive Gas Station/4 Dispensers $ 300.00 1875 Lilac Drive North Holiday Stationstores, Inc. Gas Station/5 Dispensers $ 350.00 7925 Wayzata Boulevard Super America #4443 Gas Station/4 Dispensers $ 300.00 1930 Douglas Drive North Super America #4497 Gas Station/6 Dispensers $ 400.00 6955 Market Street Morrie's Cadillac SAAB Gas Station/1 Dispensers $ 75.00 7400 Wayzata Boulevard Gregg and Jim's Service, Inc. Gas Station/4 Dispensers $ 300.00 1900 Douglas Drive North Freddie's Petroleum, Inc. Gas Station/4 Dispensers $ 300.00 DBA: Amstar 9405 Medicine Lake Road General Mills Gas Station/6 Dispensers $ 400.00 1 General Mills Boulevard Regency Hospital Gas Station/1 Dispenser $ 75.00 1300 Hidden Lakes Parkway Golden Valley Country Club Gas Station/2 Dispensers $ 150.00 7001 Golden Valley Road Theodore Wirth Par 3 Gas Station/2 Dispensers $ 150.00 1313 Theodore Wirth Parkway Recommended Action Motion to authorize the issuance of licenses as recommended by staff. City o _. 0 e" ill valley Fire Der artment 763-593-8079/763-593-8098(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting April 7, 2015 Agenda Item 3. C. 5. Multi-Family Rental Property Licenses Prepared By Dave Gustafson, Fire/Property Maintenance Specialist Jill Lund, Administrative Assistant Summary As per City Code, some businesses are required to be licensed by the City. Listed below are the complex name, address and fees of those who have submitted an application for approval for multiple family rental licenses. DOVER HILLS Complex- 2400 Rhode Island Avenue Base building fee (1 @$175) $ 175 Base building fee (12 @$125) $ 1,500 STAR Status Level 4 0 Total License Fee $ 1,675 GOLDEN VALLEY TOWNHOMES - 2108/ 2120 Douglas Drive Base building fee $ 250 STAR Status Level 2 $ 60 Total License Fee $ 310 GOLDEN VALLEY TOWNHOMES - 3354/ 3360 Lilac Drive Base building fee $ 125 STAR Status Level 2 20 Total License Fee $ 145 Recommended Action Motion to authorize the issuance of license as recommended by staff. Ll v 61vctallley' Police Department 763-593-8079/763-593-8098(fax) E04iudi�lo� ......_ ° ..: i Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting April 7, 2015 Agenda Item 3, C. 6. Therapeutic Massage Facility License - Core Healing Arts LLC Prepared By Stacy Carlson, Chief of Police Jim Roberts, Sergeant Summary Core Healing Arts LLC, located at 1405 North Lilac Drive has applied for a massage facility license. Documents submitted by the applicant indicate that Core Healing Arts LLC is owned by John Carlson of New Hope, Minnesota. A background investigation of Mr. Carlson including record checks been completed. The applicant meets City Code requirements for the issuance of a massage facility license. Recommended Action Motion to approve the issuance of a Therapeutic Massage Facility License for Core Healing Arts LLC located at 1405 North Lilac Drive, Suite 113D. Regular Meeting of the Golden Valley Planning Commission March 9, 2015 A regular meeting of the Planning Commission was held at the Golden Valley City Hall, Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota, on Monday, March 9, 2015. Chair Kluchka called the meeting to order at 7 pm. Those present were Planning Commissioners Baker, Blum, Cera, Johnson, Kluchka, Segelbaum, and Waldhauser. Also present was Planning Manager Jason Zimmerman, Associate Planner/Grant Writer Emily Goellner, Physical Development Director Marc Nevinski, City Engineer Jeff Oliver, and Administrative Assistant Lisa Wittman. 1. Approval of Minutes February 23, 2015, Regular Planning Commission Meeting Waldhauser referred to the sixth paragraph on page five regarding the notification process for the Subdivision Study and asked if it was accurate to state that each homeowner received a post card. Zimmerman stated that every homeowner was sent a post card in October notifying them of the Subdivision Study. MOVED by Waldhauser, seconded by Segelbaum and motion carried unanimously to recommend approval of the February 23, 2015, minutes as submitted. 2. Informal Public Hearing — Final PUD Plan — Central Park West— Southwest Quadrant of 1-394 and Highway 100 — PU-121 Applicant: DLC Residential, LLC Address: Southwest Quadrant of 1-394 and Highway 100 Purpose: To allow two six-story multiple family residential buildings, a six-story hotel, two 11-story office buildings, a parking ramp and a linear park in both St. Louis Park and Golden Valley. Goellner referred to a site plan and explained the applicant's plan to construct two 6- story residential buildings, two 11-story office buildings, one 6-story hotel, one 7-story parking ramp, and a privately owned and maintained public park. She stated that the development will begin this year with the residential phase 1 building, the park and the reconstruction of Utica Ave. as shown on the plans. She added that the placement of the buildings hasn't changed from what was proposed during the Preliminary Plan review, however there is slightly more parking proposed. Goellner stated that as part of the Preliminary Plan approval the Planning Commission and City Council required an updated traffic study, an additional neighborhood meeting and an expanded area for mailing hearing notices. All of which have been addressed. Goellner discussed some of the concerns that have been expressed from residents east Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission March 9, 2015 Page 2 of Highway 100 including difficulties getting onto Wayzata Blvd., traffic speed, blind corners, icy streets, and dangerous conditions for pedestrians. She added that residents would like to see improvements such as a stoplight or additional stop signs, dedicated turn lanes, and clearly marked crosswalks at the intersection of Quentin Ave. and Wayzata Blvd. Goellner stated that an updated traffic study was completed on January 19, 2015. The findings in that study showed that 15% of the traffic generated from Central Park West is projected to utilize Wayzata Boulevard east of Highway 100. Due to this increased traffic, the intersection of Quentin & Wayzata will fall to Level of Service E (not acceptable); therefore, the developer will be responsible for improvements that bring it back to Level of Service C. She stated that the developer will be required to make turn lane improvements, an all-way stop, and pedestrian/bike path improvements at this intersection. She added that traffic calming along Wayzata Boulevard could be incorporated into the City's Capital Improvement Program and that the City will work with Hennepin County on implementation. Zimmerman discussed the proposed parking for the site. He stated that the proposal is lacking 323 parking spaces, 3,598 parking spaces are required and 3,275 spaces are proposed. He referred to the bicycle parking requirements and explained that Golden Valley requires 5% of the parking required for vehicles and St. Louis Park requires 10% of the parking required for vehicles. The applicant is proposing 35% of the required car parking for the residential phase 1 building and 42% of the required car parking for the residential phase 2 building. Zimmerman stated that staff initially thought that a Joint Powers Agreement would be necessary to address some of the issues between Golden Valley and St. Louis Park. However, it has been determined that the Joint Powers Agreement isn't the appropriate mechanism, and that a service contract for inspections, etc. would be more appropriate. Zimmerman referred to a site plan and discussed access, circulation, and pedestrian connections within the site. Johnson asked how the items in the Fire Chief's staff report will be addressed. Zimmerman stated that the Fire Chief's memo will become a condition of approval. Baker noted that the supplemental parking for the hotel is located in the proposed parking ramp. He asked how long of walk that would be for hotel guests and if that is a practical place for them access the parking. Zimmerman said there have been discussions about the hotel offering valet parking or potentially using the office parking ramp. He added that as the hotel is closer to being built the details will be worked out. Baker stated that the parking is 10% short of the City's requirement and asked if that is common. Zimmerman said allowances are made especially when there are different uses and hours of operation within the businesses in a PUD. He added that there are a lot of the pedestrian options with this site as well which allows for some flexibility. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission March 9, 2015 Page 3 Blum asked about a snow removal plan. Goellner stated that the plan is for on-site snow storage until the site is completely built out, at that time snow will be removed from the site as needed. Baker asked if the recommended changes were made to the appearance of the parking ramp for the residents to the east. Goellner said yes, and referred to the renderings in the plans. Kluchka asked if the applicant is held to designs shown on their plans. Goellner said that is her understanding. Segelbaum referred to the City Engineer Jeff Oliver's staff report and read the part where it states that the traffic study concludes that the increase in traffic resulting from the current PUD proposal does not create any new, or unduly add to, the existing traffic on Wayzata Blvd. Therefore, staff is not recommending that this developer be responsible for additional improvements on Wayzata Blvd. Segelbaum asked staff to show on the site plans which part of Wayzata Blvd. the City Engineer is referring to. Zimmerman pointed out the area along Wayzata Blvd. where there is potential in the future to do some traffic calming and improvements. Oliver stated that there are existing issues on Wayzata Blvd. that the City is already aware of. He explained that the increase in traffic from this development does not result in the significant degradation of the capacity of the roadway, and the improvements needed on Wayzata Blvd. can't be linked to this development. However, the proposed development will directly affect the intersection of Quentin and Wayzata and the developer will be required to fund those improvements. Baker said he understands that the capacity doesn't suggest mitigation, but questioned when the issues the neighbors have raised such as safety, speed, and visibility will need mitigation. Oliver said these issues have been present since 1-394 was built. He added that Staff will begin looking for other potential funding sources to finance the construction of traffic calming, sight line, and pedestrian and bicycle improvements along Wayzata Blvd. and that the issues need to be addressed as opportunities present themselves. Baker asked how the disproportionate benefit of taxes will be addressed since a Joint Powers Agreement is no longer being considered. Physical Development Director Marc Nevinski stated that the Joint Powers Agreement was considering issues such as inspections, police, fire, etc., but not taxes. The Cities will tax separately based on the rates and values. Everything located Golden Valley will be taxed in Golden Valley. Kluchka asked how people would vote with the building straddling the municipal boundary. Nevinski said that people who live on the east side of the boundary will have the obligation to vote in Golden Valley. Baker asked about the other benefits such as traffic improvements and TIF money. Nevinski said Golden Valley doesn't have a TIF district in this location. Baker asked if there is a way for Golden Valley to benefit from St. Louis Park's TIF. Nevinski said no. Blum questioned how the responsibility would be split with the hotel when the hotel building is in St. Louis Park, but the hotel parking lot is in Golden Valley. Nevinski said the two Cities will enter into a service contract for these types of issues. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission March 9, 2015 Page 4 Kluchka asked if the Planning Commission will review the Wayzata/Quentin intersection plans. Zimmerman said the plans won't come to the Planning Commission for review, but the City Council will review them. Waldhauser asked about improvements to the intersections and ramps on 1-394. Zimmerman stated that most of those improvements were done during the first phase of the West End development. Johnson noted that the overflow parking for the hotel is planned to be in the office parking ramp. He questioned how that would work if the hotel is built before the office parking ramp. Zimmerman suggested surface parking could be used until the office ramp is built. Blum referred to the proposed trails in the park area and said he is concerned about accidents occurring because the trails crisscross multiple times. David Graham, ESG Architects, reviewed the overall design vision for the project. He said they've worked hard to reduce the amount of office space from 1.1 million square feet to approximately 700,000, and to reduce the amount of trips and the size of the parking ramp. He said he thinks a key part of this project are the public realm amenities including the central park, public art, streetscape amenities, and a water feature. He stated that Utica Avenue will be completely rebuilt with a class A landscaping and urban design plan, and that this project is a model for sustainable growth in a first ring suburb. He showed a rendering of the site and explained the pedestrian and bike connections. He referred to the life cycle housing in this proposal and stated that 3% of the units will be affordable. He showed a rendering of the park area and discussed the landscaping, seating, climbing walls, and the water feature. He added that the park includes high quality pavement intended more for pedestrians and passive biking, it is not intended to be a bike trail. He showed a rendering of the proposed woonerf and explained that it will be a connection to Utica Avenue for automobiles and pedestrians and will include high quality pavement and raised tree planters. He showed renderings of the proposed parking ramp and residential buildings and discussed the materials that will be used in their construction. He added that there will be 80 residential units in Golden Valley. Kluchka asked if the park designs being shown are really what is being proposed. Graham said yes. Kluchka stated that the sidewalks don't seem to connect to where the crosswalks will be on Utica Avenue. Graham said that was done intentionally to cross Utica and then move along the sidewalk on Utica and create an entry monument at that point. Kluchka said that design won't work with bikes, and pedestrians will walk over the grass. He added that the sidewalks don't connect with the human use. Graham said he would continue to work with staff on the details. Waldhauser said she is pleased to see shade trees in the plans, but she didn't see any structured soil boxes to support the trees. Graham stated that there will be raised planters with sitting benches in the woonerf area. He said he would provide more details about the planting of the trees. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission March 9, 2015 Page 5 Segelbaum asked for clarification of the traffic flow to the different structures. Luke Payne, Kimley Horn, said the entire development is designed to be served off Utica Avenue. The hotel will have an entrance on Wayzata Blvd. He referred to site plan and discussed the access drives and traffic patterns. Segelbaum asked if there will be other access points to the parking structure. Payne said there is a connection at the south end of the parking ramp and at the northeast end of the ramp, but the bulk of the trips are anticipated to come off of Utica. Kluchka asked if the intersection of Utica Avenue and 16th will be a controlled intersection. Payne said there is stop control on 16tH Waldhauser referred to the affordable units and asked if the 3% mentioned was for the phase 1 construction or all of the residential constructions. Graham said 3% is for all of the residential. Waldhauser said she thinks the numbers referenced in the staff report are incorrect because the monthly rent range seems wrong. Nevinski clarified that 3% of these units will be affordable to people making 60% of the area median income. Johnson referred to the trash hauling being limited to one vendor. He asked the applicant if they are contractually obligated to one hauler and how enforcement of that would work. Graham said the intent is to have one trash hauler and that is a fundamental management issue to see that trash hauling works properly. Kluchka opened the public hearing. Todd Shipman, 1510 Fairlawn Way, said his main concern is the traffic going east of Highway 100. He said in his view the previous PUD and this PUD are really irrelevant to the impact it will have on his life which is just getting access to his home and getting on and off Wayzata Blvd. He said the sight lines are difficult already and he hasn't heard any talk about the topography, He said on Wayzata Blvd. there is a curve, a hill, and a ramp across 1-394 that connects to a bicycle path in North Tyrol. He said he commonly comes across bicyclists in the dark, and the sun doesn't shine down onto the pavement during the winter so the curve is icy. He said it is important to the people in his neighborhood who pay taxes not to be forgotten by Golden Valley because they value their unique neighborhood. He said they also have restricted access to their neighborhood and City services could be at risk. He said there were two snow events this winter that significantly impacted Wayzata Blvd. and backed traffic up all the way to Theodore Wirth Parkway because everyone avoids 1-394. He said he can't imagine, as nice as Utica Ave. will be, that people won't go down Wayzata Blvd. to get onto 1-394 at night. He said it is a false assumption to base the issues only on traffic counts and the City is really doing a disservice to the neighbors. He said they could secede to Minneapolis or St. Louis Park and take their tax revenue with them. He added that it is really a tough scenario especially impacted by weather and any additional traffic will significantly impact them. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission March 9, 2015 Page 6 David Sussman, 1445 Fairlawn Way, said he understands the capacity of road, but questioned the capacity of the road at rush hour. He said today at 5:15 it took him almost two minutes before he could turn left onto Wayzata Blvd. because the traffic just kept coming. He said it's been growing since the West End development was built it is going to be really hard to cross that street unless something is done about the traffic. Otis Godfrey, 4630 Douglas Avenue, said he pays taxes in Golden Valley and he likes to live in Golden Valley. He referred to the proposed 3,500 parking spots and the site plan showing two exits from the parking ramp onto Wayzata Blvd. and questioned how the applicant can say all the cars will go out onto Utica Ave. He said traffic is like water and if it gets backed up in one place it will flow to other places. He said it is not reasonable to expect that everyone will go in and out on Utica Ave. He said the neighborhood east of Highway 100 is a beautiful, quiet neighborhood. It is important to have this balance and they don't need more traffic going into this area. He said when he thinks of traffic calming he is not just concerned about Wayzata Blvd. he is concerned about traffic flowing into the neighborhood as well. He said if people get frustrated enough they will find ways into their neighborhood. He said the City has known about the traffic problems for approximately 20 years, and now the traffic is being expanded by 25% and we're saying that it can compete in the next CIP against other projects. He questioned how this won't be an impact to the neighborhood and said people will be flowing into this neighborhood that shouldn't be. He urged the City to think about it and not just treat it as a problem to be handled later. Daon Karpan, 1400 Natchez Avenue South, said she is concerned about the traffic. She said in the last traffic study there was more of a promise to put an all-way stop and a turn lane in at the Quentin/Wayzata intersection. She said she is disappointed to not see that in these final plans. She said she doesn't trust the traffic study because from what she understands it is using the numbers regarding speed from 2007 and a lot has changed since then. She said the traffic volume was considered when there was a lot of snow and she believes traffic was down considerably so she is not trusting that the numbers in the study are an accurate reflection of what she experiences day to day. She referred to the expectation that people won't use Wayzata Blvd. as access, and that they will naturally tend to go to Utica. She said she wants to see more proof that will substantiate that and she wants a traffic study done reflecting today's conditions because the numbers don't add up. Segelbaum referred to Karpan's comment about improvements to the Quentin/Wayzata intersection and stated that while there aren't plans showing specific improvements, there is a large amount of money budgeted to do improvements to that intersection. Kluchka agreed and noted that there is a condition to execute a design for improvements at that intersection. Oliver explained that there will be a public improvement project funded by the developer. The intersection will be modified to have eastbound dual right turn lanes, a south bound right turn, and all-way stop for pedestrian crossings. Jason Johnson, 1550 Natchez Avenue South, said he is excited about this development but traffic must be addressed. He said he knows for a fact people won't follow Utica Ave. He asked if there are other ways to make sure people who don't live in the area won't Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission March 9, 2015 Page 7 use Wayzata Blvd, such as signs that say residents only during certain times. He said traffic is going to be a problem whether studies say so or not, and that intuition rules in this case. He added that the traffic will choke off this neighborhood from the rest of Golden Valley. Robert Lazear, 1519 Natchez Avenue South, said there is a blind curve at Natchez and Wayzata with almost no margin of error to pull out onto Wayzata. He said this isn't theoretical and it is absolutely essential that this be addressed now. He said the traffic study was done and he appreciates that, but he also knows when one side hires the expert and pays them, that it's not a completely independent study. He said the methodology is interesting because the study only looked at the am traffic and the traffic in the afternoon is at least as bad. He said he knows that as part of this project they are adding approximately 3,200 to 3,600 parking spaces to the density in the West End. He said as the parking ramp is designed now, there will be two exits dumping on Wayzata Blvd. and 2,536 two-way peak trips. He said the issue isn't whether there is capacity spread over 24 hours, it is about two hours in the morning and two hours in the afternoon. He noted that speed limit is 35 miles per hour but the traffic study showed that people travel 39 miles per hour which doesn't give them a lot of time to pull out onto Wayzata. He said it's shocking that back in 2007 neighbors said there needed to be traffic calming, an all-way stop, and curb extensions and none of those things have been done. The density has been added from the first round of development and more density is about to be added with this proposal. He questioned if the Quentin/Wayzata intersection improvements are a part of this PUD. The Commission said yes. He asked that a traffic study be done a year after the development is complete to see if the traffic control at that intersection is working. He said he also wants a condition added that there be no exits allowed onto Wayzata Blvd. He said the reality is people will leave the West End area and sneak through their neighborhood. Peter Zakrajsheck, 1425 Natchez Avenue South, said he likes the project, but the one concern is traffic. He said no one is listening to the neighbors or giving them the time of day and they are being told it will be considered in the next CIP. He said Natchez is the only street that goes through to Cedar Ave. and people will cut through. He suggested a do not enter sign be placed on the north end of the street similar to what is on the south end. He wants something done about the traffic to make the area safe. Ann Godfrey, no address given, said at her corner there are seven school buses that drop off and pick up children. She said the traffic comes really fast and the stop signs aren't observed so she's learned not to walk when schools in the area are getting out. She said she is concerned for the kids in the neighborhood especially with more traffic: Seeing and hearing no one else wishing to comment, Kluchka closed the public hearing. Kluchka said he is hearing that Wayzata Blvd. isn't a great design and hasn't been for a long time. He asked what the City can do to make improvements. Segelbaum asked if the City has control of Wayzata Blvd. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission March 9, 2015 Page 8 Oliver explained that until recently Wayzata Blvd. was owned by MnDOT but it is now a City street. He stated that staff has been listening to the neighbors and will be putting together a plan. He said these issues aren't less important, there are just a lot of on- going issues that also need addressing so all projects need to be evaluated with the resources the City has. He stated that staff is working with Minneapolis and St. Louis Park on bicycle and pedestrian issues and added that education and enforcement are also parts of the on-going process that the City will continue to work on. Segelbaum asked if there are things that aren't a great cost that could be done to help the situation such as signage. Oliver said that in general, signage is not that effective. He said enforcement can be effective but again, it is a matter of resources and an officer can't be there all of the time. Cera asked if the City would consider a 3-way stop at the Quentin and Natchez intersection. Oliver said his opinion is that non-compliance and crashes will escalate if stop signs are put in where they are not warranted. He added that studies have shown that people speed up after the stop sign in order to make up for lost time. He reiterated that there is no single thing that will solve the issues, but that some improvements along with education and enforcement will help. Blum asked if there is anything preventing the City to require a congestion tax or a one- way toll onto Quentin during rush hour. Oliver said that would not be statutorily permitted in the State of Minnesota. Waldhauser asked if there is any way to separate the neighborhood from Wayzata Blvd. and direct all traffic to a street on the south side. Oliver said that could be done, but there would be unintended consequences and emergency response would be an issue. Kluchka asked if the City would consider limiting the exits onto Wayzata Blvd. Oliver said that can be continued to be reviewed, but typically the City wants multiple access points for emergencies. He added that not allowing access to the east will create problems elsewhere, and the access to Wayzata Blvd. can't be cut entirely. Kluchka asked if the traffic can be revisited each year, or after each phase of development. Oliver said traffic counts can be added to this area and he would not be opposed to reviewing the area two years after it is built out. Kluchka suggested revisiting the traffic issues when the PUD is amended for the office phase. Baker said a PUD is supposed to benefit the City and he feels in many ways this project is benefitting the City, but one thing he thinks is lacking is the City's response to the traffic issues on Wayzata Blvd. He said he isn't convinced that stop signs on Wayzata Blvd. wouldn't be an inexpensive benefit to the neighborhood. He said maybe the stop signs would increase accidents but he is not concerned about that if those accidents are the fault of the people who are ignoring the signs. He is concerned about the neighborhood not being able to turn onto Wayzata Blvd. and he believes stop signs at Natchez and June might be a way to discourage people from using Wayzata Blvd. He said he agrees that it is a very fast, hard-to-access road and he is inclined to make a Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission March 9, 2015 Page 9 motion requiring that the project be conditioned on the developer paying for traffic solutions on Wayzata Blvd. which may even include a traffic light at Quentin. He said he thinks the options are being dismissed too readily. Segelbaum said he thinks this is a wonderful project, but the major issue is the traffic. He said the professional traffic study says a 3-way stop is warranted at the Quentin/Wayzata intersection so he tends to rely on that. He added that he would like to see what else could be done without using CIP resources. Waldhauser said she believes there are issues that have been here a long time and she doesn't think it should be incumbent on the developer to fix 20 year old issues. She said she thinks it's incumbent on Golden Valley and St. Louis Park to figure out what can be done about the traffic issues this neighborhood. She said she would like to make a recommendation that the City come up with a plan that will provide more certainty to the neighborhood. Kluchka asked if the City would consider exploring non-capital intensive traffic calming improvements. Zimmerman said the issues can be explored, but he questions who would make the decisions if they are not warranted by the traffic study. Segelbaum said he thinks the City Engineer could ultimately decide. Baker said he is not satisfied with the plan. He said a plan is nice, but it won't ensure that anything will happen. He said that the developer may not be directly responsible for the concerns they are hearing, but the cost of a couple of traffic signs in the context of multi- million dollar project is a rounding error. He said he is concerned that the City won't get around to it even if the Planning Commission insists that the City create a plan. He said this has been a problem for years and perhaps a change in ownership will be an opportunity to do something about the traffic problems that are only going to get worse. Cera said a PUD should focus on the development and the recommendations professional staff have made. He said he would entertain a second motion recommending that the City Council have a discussion about what they would like do about the traffic issues. Johnson said he doesn't think the City should penalize a developer for lack of action by the City. He added that this is the first significant change and opportunity for improvements in this area. Kluchka said he thinks the Planning Commission needs to make a strong statement about the traffic but he is not sure if the process allows them to make a separate motion. Baker said he thinks a motion could be made in the other business section on the agenda. Segelbaum said he would want motions made during the discussion of the item and not under other business. MOVED by Cera to recommend approval of the Final PUD plan proposal. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission March 9, 2015 Page 10 Waldhauser questioned if they should add a condition that another traffic study be done after build out is complete. Cera said he thinks that is a broader traffic issue. Waldhauser questioned if they should add a condition about further restricting egress to the east. Cera said doing that would not stop anybody from going to the east and it is safer having three exits from the ramp. Cera clarified that his motion incorporates staff conditions, Segelbaum seconded the motion and the motion carried unanimously to recommend approval of the Final PUD Plan for Central Park West PUD No. 121, subject to the following findings and conditions: Findin s: 1. The PUD plan is tailored to the specific characteristics of the site and achieves a higher quality of site planning and design than generally expected under conventional provisions of the ordinance. 2. The PUD plan preserves and protects substantial desirable portions of the site's characteristics, open space and sensitive environmental features including steep slopes, trees, scenic views, creeks, wetlands, and open waters. 3. The PUD plan includes efficient and effective use (which includes preservation) of the land. 4. The PUD Plan results in development compatible with adjacent uses and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and redevelopment plans and goals. 5. The PUD plan is consistent with preserving and improving the general health, safety and general welfare of the people of the City. 6. The PUD plan meets the PUD Intent and Purpose provision and all other PUD ordinance provisions. Conditions: 1. The plans prepared by DLC Residential, LLC, submitted with the application on February 4, 2015, shall become a part of this approval. 2. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Engineering Division to the Planning Manager, dated March 4, 2015, shall become a part of this approval. 3. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Fire Department to the Planning Manager, dated March 2, 2015, shall become a part of this approval. The applicant shall address the remaining unresolved issues outlined in the memo prior to Final PUD approval. 4. All signage must meet the requirements of the City's Sign Code (Section 4.20). 5. A park dedication fee of$70,568 (2% of the estimated land value) shall be paid prior to approval of the Final Plat. 6. The Final Plat shall include "P.U.D." in its title. 7. This approval is subject to all other state, federal, and local ordinances, regulations, or laws with authority over this development. 8. The City of St. Louis Park approves that portion of the preliminary Planned Unit Development within its jurisdiction Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission March 9, 2015 Page 11 9. The property owners of any parcel in PUD No. 121 shall follow the Travel Demand Management Plan for the West End Redevelopment and Central Park West prepared by Kimley-Horn and submitted with the final PUD application in February 2015, which will serve to reduce traffic congestion. Prior to Final PUD approval, the applicant shall include specific target dates in this plan. The applicant shall pay the remaining 50% of the Traffic Management Administration Fees for Lot 1 when submitting a building permit application. The applicant or future property owner of Lot 3 and Outlot A shall pay the Traffic Management Administration Fees, as outlined in the City's 1-394 Overlay Zoning District Ordinance (Section 11.56). 10.The Developer shall enter into an agreement with the City of Golden Valley for public use of the park outlot. 11.Prior to the City signing and releasing the final plat to the developer for filing with Hennepin County, the PUD permit and Development Agreement shall be finalized between the City and the Developer. MOVED by Baker, seconded by Segelbaum and motion carried unanimously to recommend that the City Council address the traffic issues on Wayzata Blvd. raised by residents including: access, speed, safety, congestion, etc. Segelbaum said he would like to be specific about the area to be studied. Baker said the area of study should be Wayzata Blvd. between France and Douglas. 3. Informal Public Hearing —Zoning Code Text Amendment— Size of Accessory Structures —ZO00-97 Applicant: City of Golden Valley Purpose: To consider amending language in the Zoning Code in order to match the State Building Code regarding the size of accessory structures allowed before a building permit is required. Zimmerman stated that the State Building Code was recently revised to require building permits for accessory structures only if they exceed 200 square feet in size. He explained that the City's current Zoning Code states that a building permit must be obtained if an accessory structure exceeds 120 square feet in size. In order to keep the City's requirements consistent with those of the State, staff is recommending that the Zoning Code be amended to require building permits for accessory structures if they exceed 200 square feet. He stated that there is another section of the Zoning Code which limits the type of roofs allowed on accessory structures over 120 square feet that staff is recommending that also be changed to 200 square feet. Baker asked if the City has a choice in amending the language in the Zoning Code. Zimmerman said the language could be removed from the Zoning Code and replaced with language referring to the State's Building Code requirements instead. Cera said he would like to keep the language in the Zoning Code. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission March 9, 2015 Page 12 Baker questioned if the City could consider being more restrictive. He said he wants to be sure they are getting the right advice and asked if this is the advice of the inspectors or of the City Attorney. Nevinski explained that the State Building Code is now defining accessory structures less than 200 square feet in size as not needing a building permit. He stated that the Zoning Code can add to that requirement, but the City has adopted the State Building Code and is obligated follow it and enforce it. Kluchka asked if the City is able to enact its own restrictions in the Building Code. Nevinski said no. Segelbaum said the City can enact Zoning Code provisions. Zimmerman reiterated that this proposal is to make the Zoning Code consistent with the State Building Code already adopted. Kluchka asked if the City can make zoning changes that are inconsistent with the building code to offer additional restrictions. Nevinski said he would not advise creating a contradictory situation. Baker questioned if the City should change just because the State has. He said he doesn't have a sense of how often this restriction has a bearing on what Golden Valley residents do, or the impact of the size of accessory structures on neighbors. Segelbaum asked about current limitations for accessory structures. Zimmerman said the Zoning Code address height and setbacks for accessory structures. He said staff will be enacting a Zoning Permit process for accessory structures in the future. He clarified that staff isn't recommending these changes just because the State made changes. It's because the City has adopted the State Building Code and doesn't want its own codes in conflict with each other. Kluchka opened the public hearing. Seeing and hearing no one wishing to comment, Kluchka closed the public hearing. MOVED by Waldhauser, seconded by Johnson and motion carried unanimously to amend the Zoning Code to raise the minimum size of an accessory structure from 120 to 200 square feet for building permits. Blum noted that there are two sections of the Zoning Code that need to be amended. MOVED by Kluchka, seconded by Waldhauser and motion carried unanimously to recommend approval for the Zoning Code Text Amendment in Subdivisions 12 (E) and (J) to increase the minimum square footage to 200 square feet for the size required for a building permit as recommended by staff. MOVED by Cera, seconded by Waldhauser and motion carried unanimously to rescind the first motion. --Short Recess-- Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission March 9, 2015 Page 13 4. Discuss hotel parking requirements Goellner stated that staff would like to consider reducing the minimum parking requirement for hotels. She explained that the current requirement is 1.5 parking spaces per unit plus parking for other uses. She stated that the Super 8 Hotel is considering expanding and have provided vehicle counts performed in the summer of 2014 to demonstrate that with 97% occupancy the most vehicles registered was 84 for 140 rooms. She discussed the parking requirements of several surrounding cities. Segelbaum asked about the requirements for hotels that might host large events. Goeliner said the Zoning Code requires more parking spaces for other uses such as restaurants and event space. Waldhauser said she thinks one parking space per unit seems reasonable as long as there are provisions for other uses. She questioned if there should be additional spaces for staff. Zimmerman said the number of employees is quite low. Johnson asked if parking for motels should be added to the Zoning Code. Gera said he thinks that would be added to the other uses language and that all uses would be considered. Goeliner said she would work on the specific amendment language and bring the item back to a future Planning Commission meeting for a public hearing. 5. Discuss the current Zoning Code requirement regarding side yard setbacks increasing with the height of a house Zimmerman stated that in 2006 the Planning Commission and City Council studied infill development which considered height, impervious surface, setbacks, etc. He said that residents have recently been questioning if staff has been interpreting the Zoning Code requirements correctly. He explained that after researching what was considered in 2006 he thinks there may be some gray area in how the Zoning Code is being applied versus how it was intended. He said staff is looking for direction regarding what was intended and how to move forward. Zimmerman explained that the Zoning Code currently states that as homes get taller the side yard setback increases. One interpretation is that once a house is taller than 15 feet the entire structure shifts away from the side yard property line. Another interpretation is that only the part of the house that is taller than 15 feet needs to be further away from the property line, but the part of the house that is 15 feet tall can be located right at the side yard setback line. He showed the Commission several examples illustrating the different interpretations. Baker said there are two ways that height can increase. One is if an existing house is remodeled and the other is if a new house is built. He said he understands that an existing house being remodeled might need to take the "wedding cake" approach, but he doesn't understand why a new house should take the "wedding cake" approach. He Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission March 9, 2015 Page 14 said he really thinks the intent was to differentiate between those two circumstances. He added that if the Zoning Code language changes he thinks there needs to be a lot of study and thought involved. Waldhauser said the point was not to have a big, tall wall next to a neighboring house. The other issue was to not take away sunlight from a neighboring property. She said there is no good reason to set the entire house further away from the property line to accomplish those goals. Baker said he doesn't think the Planning Commission is being asked to revisit the issue, they are being asked how the Zoning Code language should be interpreted. He said he wants what was originally intended to be applied. Zimmerman stated that the City Manager and the City Attorney are not only looking at the intent, but how to go forward. He stated that when the infill study changes were adopted, the City Council was intending to be open to changing the language if needed as it moved forward. Cera said the original intent was to increase the entire setback with new construction. He said he wants the Code to be interpreted how it was intended and not how it has been interpreted since its adoption. Kluchka asked if there are different code requirements regarding new construction and remodeling. Zimmerman stated that there is grandfathering language for construction prior to 2008, but the current language applies to all new construction. Blum said he likes the "wedding cake" approach because it has worked historically and it allows for more flexibility and a more diverse housing stock. Baker said he would strongly oppose changing the language to match how the Code has been interpreted rather than what was originally intended. He said if the Zoning Code has been interpreted incorrectly he wouldn't worry about those homes, or want to tear homes down, but he wants to reinforce the decisions made in the recent subdivision study. Segelbaum said it seems to him that staff has been interpreting the language how it was put in place and it was the fault of what was enacted. He said he thinks the interpretation by staff can continue. Cera said he thinks the language is clear that the whole structure should be further away from the property line once it is taller than 15 feet. Johnson said the goal is to have property owners obeying the same rules and they need to consider the end product. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission March 9, 2015 Page 15 Kluchka referred to other cities that require one wall to remain when doing a tear down and asked if the intent to maintain what's there. He said he thinks the appropriate implementation means setting back the whole structure. Segelbaum questioned if an existing house is at the 15-foot setback line and a second story was added if the second story would then have to step back further away from the property line. Zimmerman said yes. He added that the focus in 2006 was preservation, conservation and not adding massing in the wrong places. Johnson noted that a homeowner could go to the Board of Zoning Appeals and ask for a variance taking into consideration the other homes in the neighborhood. Zimmerman asked if the height should only be measured at the front of the house and then applied to both sides. Kluchka said that is how he remembers the original intent. Zimmerman explained that if the City Council wants to move forward with the original intent, the City Attorney has suggested setting a grandfathered date and then moving forward. Segelbaum referred to permits issued before the grandfathered date and asked if they would be considered conforming. Zimmerman said yes. Segelbaum said he doesn't want to make existing homes become nonconforming. Cera questioned how the subdivision study would have been different if the City had been interpreting the Zoning Code as intended. Waldhauser noted that if both sides of a house have to be set back further from the property line the City could get houses with the garages in front. She said the City will get a more attractive result if they allow the "wedding cake" design. Segelbaum said he thinks the Zoning Code should be interpreted as it was intended and only allow the "wedding cake" design for remodels. The Commissioners agreed. Zimmerman said another issue staff would like clarification on is the articulation requirement. He questioned if second floors have to be articulated and if bay windows, cantilevered spaces, or chimneys could count as articulation, or if the entire wall has to articulate. He also questioned if articulation should apply to any wall, or only to new walls. The consensus of the Commission was any wall over 32 feet in length should be articulated. Zimmerman said he would work on the Zoning Code amendment language and bring it back to the Commission for a public hearing. 6. Reports on Meetings of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority, City Council, Board of Zoning Appeals and other Meetings Baker reported on the METRO Blue Line workshop meeting held on February 26 at St. Margaret Mary Church. He stated that he and Gillian Rosenquist have been appointed to the new Community Advisory Committee. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission March 9, 2015 Page 16 Nevinski reported on the proposed CP-BNSF freight train connection in Crystal. Kluchka asked if the traffic issues on Wayzata Blvd. will be discussed at the upcoming City Council strategic planning retreat. Nevinski said they will be focusing on balancing existing projects with new projects. He said he would work with the City Engineer to figure out how to budget for a study and improvements. 7. Other Business • Council Liaison Report No report was given. 8. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 10:23 pm. Charles D. Segelbaum, Secretary Lisa Wittman, Administrative Assistant GOLDEN VALLEY ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION Regular Meeting Minutes February 23, 2015 Present: Commissioners Tracy Anderson, Lynn Gitelis, Dawn Hill, Larry Johnson, Jim Stremel, Eric Eckman, Public Works Specialist; and Lisa Nesbitt, Administrative Assistant Absent: Commissioner: Tonia Galonska and Debra Yahle Call to Order Stremel called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. Approval of Regular Meeting Minutes — January 26, 2015 MOVED by Hill, seconded by Gitelis, and the motion carried unanimously to approve the minutes of the January 26, 2015 regular meeting. Program/Proiect Updates The complete program/project summary is on file. Commission Member Council Reports None. Other Business The commissioners discussed the 2015 Work Plan and the annual report. These items will be reviewed at the March meeting and then presented to Council at a future work session. Adiourn MOVED by Gitelis, seconded by Hill, and the motion carried to adjourn. Lisa Nesbitt Administrative Assistant TEEN COMMITTEE Regular Meeting Minutes December 22, 2014 1. Call to Order Knudson called the meeting to order at 6:05 PM. 2. Roll Call Present: Committee Members: Sam Buttress, Owen Hoeft, Shivani Nookala, Stella Bagerman, and Jack Knudson, City Staff: Brian Erickson, Recreation Supervisor; Carrie Anderson, Recreation Supervisor. Absent: Committee Members: Hannah Segelbaum, Brittany Blazar, Sarah Carlson, Melanie Blazar, non-voting committee member Olivia Behn. 3. Approval of Minutes — October 26, 2014 MOTION: Moved by Hoeft and seconded by Knudson to approve the October 26, 2014 meeting minutes. Motion carried unanimously. 4. Teen Mental Health Initiative Knudson discussed an idea for a mental health initiative in the community. The committee discussed some ideas to raise awareness. The committee decided to invite an expert to give direction for the next meeting. Knudson volunteered to contact someone. 5. Golden Valley Days Teen Stand Knudson presented an idea to have a booth at Golden Valley Days to raise awareness about the committee. The committee agreed that this would be a good idea. 6. Teen Committee at Council Meeting The committee reviewed ideas from last meeting to attract teens, such as a street dance and there was talk of having this at the water tower. Hoeft again suggested this location, which received the support of the committee. Hoeft suggested beach volleyball with music. Anderson said this would be an easy thing to set up at Brookview Park if the committee was interested. Knudson suggested the group should take on 3 things for the upcoming year. He suggested a concert that promotes teen mental health. 7. Teen Topic Review Hoeft spoke about the possibility of intramural sports taking place in the summer. All committee members agreed that this would be a positive addition to the Golden Valley Community. Some of these sports could include: Ultimate frisbee, and/or Volleyball taking place at Brookview Park or Theodore Wirth Park. 8. Updates No updates from the Chair or Committee Members. Anderson suggested putting an advertisement in the Golden Valley Park and Rec summer brochure for teen committee applicants. Haberman suggested putting a group picture in this advertisement. Knudson suggested having the committee write a description for this ad. The committee decided to work on this project at the January meeting. 11. Adjournment MOTION: Moved by Knudson and seconded by Haberman to adjourn at 6:40 PM. Motion carried unanimously. ATTEST: Jack Knudson, Chair Shivani Nookala, Committee Member MINUTES Human Rights Commission (HRC) City of Golden Valley 7800 Golden Valley Road Golden Valley, MN 55427 Council Conference Room February 24, 2015 Commissioners present: Teresa Martin, Chair Carla Johnson, Vice Chair Jonathan Burris Simon Gotlieb Payton Perkins Michael Pristash Sue Phelps Andrew Ramlet Commissioners absent: Adam Buttress Staff: Chantell Knauss, Assistant City Manager The meeting was convened at 6:33 pm by Chair Martin. Approval of January 27, 2015 Meeting Minutes Motion by Commissioner Burris, second by Commissioner Gotlieb to approve the January 27, 2015 minutes. Motion carried 8-0. Council Updates Knauss informed the HRC that the Council is in the process of reviewing the Boards/Commission Guidelines and there may be an upcoming change to allow for Chairs and Vice Chairs to serve up to two years. If any change is made, the HRC will need to amend their Bylaws in order to reflect any Council changes. Old Business Preventing Genocide Program Update Chair Martin reported that the co-sponsored program, Preventing Genocide, with the RRCs of Crystal, New Hope and Robbinsdale will be held on Saturday, April 18 from 10-11:30 am at the Crystal Community Center (Meeting Rooms A and B), 4800 Douglas Drive North. The speaker is Executive Director Dr. Ellen J. Kennedy of World Without Genocide. The event will be free to the public. The planning committee's next meeting will be held at Mountain Mudd in Crystal on March 22 at 9 am. At their last meeting, the committee discussed possible options for security at the event. The committee would also like the involved cities to proclaim April as Genocide Awareness Month. Human Rights Commission February 24, 2015 Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 3 Motion by Commissioner Burris, second by Commissioner Phelps to recommend the City Council proclaim April as Genocide Awareness Month. Motion carried 8-0. This item will be on the April 7, 2015 City Council Agenda for consideration. HRC members should plan on being in attendance to accept the proclamation. May 2015 HRC Conversations Planning — Blank Slate Theatre Production of "bottom" Commissioners discussed how to best alert student groups and access high school email newsletters. This item will be placed on the March agenda for further discussion. October 2015 HRC Conversations Planninq Some possible resources/panelists: • Star Tribune article, "State is Out Front Against Sex Trafficking," published February 21, 2015 • CNN three-part video, "Breaking Free" • Polaris Project— Brandon Bushard may be a possible panelist • Hennepin County • Minneapolis Police Department — a representative has agreed to be on the panel Commissioner Pristash will contact the Minneapolis Police Department (PD) representative to see if they are able to attend either the April 28 or May 26 HRC meeting to discuss the Human Sex Trafficking topic with the HRC and help the HRC focus the October HRC Conversations event. HRC Traveling Meeting Dates/Times (d). Covenant Village Chair Martin has talked with Covenant Village, an independent and assisted living facility, and they are very interested in hosting an HRC meeting. Depending on when the Minneapolis PD representative is available to attend the HRC meeting, the traveling meeting will be scheduled at Covenant Village for either April 28 or May 26, whichever date the Minneapolis PD representative is not attending. HRC Banner Update Chair Martin and Knauss met with Communications staff to discuss banner design ideas. Knauss will work with Communications staff and have options available for HRC to review at the March meeting. New Business Donut Talk: MN Demographics Chair Martin expressed interest in having an HRC member attend this event on March 18 from 10-11:30 am at the Crystal Community Center and provide an update back to HRC. Commissioner Phelps volunteered to attend. Potential Event Partnership for Future Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Holiday In the interest of time, it was the consensus of the HRC to discuss this at the next meeting. Golden Valley Teen Committee Meeting Update Chair Martin and Commissioner Ramlet reported that they had attended the Teen Committee's last meeting. The Teen Committee expressed a high level of interest in partnering with HRC to sponsor a future event. Human Rights Commission February 24, 2015 Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 3 HRC Essay Contest Commissioners asked if HRC had sponsored an essay contest in the past. Knauss will research and bring information to the March meeting. Adjourn Motion by Commissioner Burris, second by Commissioner Johnson to adjourn the meeting at 7:42 pm. Motion carried 8-0. Follow-up Items: • Commissioner Pristash will contact the Minneapolis Police Department (PD) representative to see if they are able to attend either the April 28 or May 26 HRC meeting to discuss the Human Sex Trafficking topic with the HRC. • Knauss will research previous HRC essay contest information. • Everyone needs to think of possible subject matter experts that may be able to serve as panelists for the October HRC Conversations event. Teresa Martin, Chair ATTEST: Chantell Knauss, Staff Liaison Approved by HRC: March 10, 2015 Human Rights Commission February 24,2015 Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 3 Joint Meeting of the Golden Valley City Council and Planning Commission February 9, 2015 A joint meeting of the City Council and Planning Commission was held at the Golden Valley City Hall, Council Conference Room, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota, on Monday, February 9, 2015. Mayor Harris called the meeting to order at 8:20 pm. Those present were Mayor Shep Harris; Council Members Joanie Clausen, Larry Fonnest, Steve Schmidgall, Andy Snope; Planning Commissioners Rich Baker, Ron Blum, David Cera, Andy Johnson, John Kluchka, Chuck Segelbaum, Cathy Waldhauser; Physical Development Director Marc Nevinski, Planning Manager Jason Zimmerman, Associate Planner/Grant Writer Emily Goellner; Jeff Miller and Rita Trapp, HKGi consultants 1. Subdivision Study's Recommendations for Potential Subdivision/Zoning Ordinance Amendments Miller introduced the topics to be discussed and pointed to the six areas in which recommendations for change would be made: tree preservation, minimum lot size, irregular lots, lot line definitions, house to lot relationships, and PVDs. A) Tree Preservation Miller reviewed the concerns of residents and outlined the proposed changes. Cera asked if the percentage of trees allowed for removal was currently 40% and if it was proposed to be changed to 20%. Miller said yes. Kluchka asked if there was no subdivision then no tree preservation requirement would be necessary? Miller said yes. Baker asked why a tree survey was being required. Miller stated that it gave visibility to the trees on a site and provided a way to initiate conversation on tree preservation as part of subdivision review, which is not now the case. Kluchka asked if this created a gap in reviewing tree preservation. Zimmerman responded that it filled a gap by bringing it to the public eye early. Waldhauser stated that it provides more information and help with public understanding but doesn't require the Planning Commission or City Council to act on it. Baker pointed out that trees that might be cut down later would be captured on the record. Clausen asked for an explanation of the 40% vs. 20% reduction. Miller indicated it had to do with the initial vs. individual lot improvement. Minutes of the Joint City Council/Planning Commission February 9, 2015 Page 2 Kluchka asked if the applicant could conduct the tree survey or if an independent third party would be required. The group agreed that a certified tree inspector should be required. Harris asked why not review tree preservation during subdivision? Kluchka replied that no trees are removed during the subdivision process, but later as part of permitting. Cera indicated that control is needed during the subdivision process. Snope replied that a preservation plan shouldn't be necessary during the subdivision process. Baker commented that it is too easy to cut down large trees and that other cities manage to preserve them and that the priority should be on large trees so that they are harder to remove. Snope asked if changes were being recommended to the subdivision code or the tree preservation code. Miller replied both. Baker said that we need to limit the removal of large trees. Snope commented that we are looking at subdivisions. Baker stated that it is about development. Miller indicated that the task was to address subdivisions. Baker asked that his concerns be captured for future discussion. Zimmerman stated that staff would like to add landscaping and other changes to the tree preservation code and wants to make those changes separately with more study. Harris indicated the need to look at the bigger picture. Baker stated he wants the City to be innovative and have a strong tree preservation code. Kluchka asked about mitigation. Zimmerman replied that the requirements are laid out in the code. Kluchka said more public education is needed. Johnson asked if significant trees could be cut down before subdivision. Miller said yes, which is why a tree survey would be helpful. Cera said it moves the starting line back from the permitting process. B) Minimum Lot Size Trapp reviewed the concerns of residents and outlined the proposed changes. She indicated the changes are proposed to be made in the subdivision code in order to avoid creating non-conformities. Snope asked for clarification on the 10,000 vs. 15,000 square foot minimums. Clausen asked if 250 feet or 500 feet was the appropriate distance. Trapp said the numbers were run both ways and it didn't make a consistent difference in the results. Clausen indicated 250 feet really captures the immediate neighborhood. Segelbaum asked if the lot to be subdivided would be included in the calculations. Trapp said no. Zimmerman asked for confirmation that it only included R-1 zoned properties. Trapp said yes. Minutes of the Joint City Council/Planning Commission February 9, 2015 Page 3 Kluchka asked if there was precedent for changing the rules for existing owners. Trapp said yes, but it was not something to be taken lightly. Kluchka asked if the City would be able to do the calculations. Zimmerman said yes. Kluchka asked if someone would be able to game the system. Trapp said it would be very difficult to do. Cera expressed his concern that larger lots could have very large homes. Waldhauser stated that we could consider reduced lot coverage for larger lots. Clausen indicated she supported the approach but that we may have to adjust other standards. Kluchka stated he is concerned about the legal risks. Fonnest asked if the League of Minnesota Cities would help if the City were to be sued. Nevinski answered that the City would be responsible for the deductible. C) Irregular Lot Shape Miller reviewed the concerns of residents and outlined the proposed changes. Kluchka asked about the use of the midpoint of the building envelope. Zimmerman replied that the staff supported using 70 feet. Miller stated that there does not seem to be precedent for using 70 feet, but that it was similar to the midpoint of the building envelope in many cases. Segelbaum asked if we might be penalizing deep lots. Segelbaum asked if it would create non-conforming lots. Miller said it could be addressed in the subdivision code to avoid that situation. D) Lot Line Definitions Trapp reviewed the concerns of residents and outlined the proposed changes. Waldhauser asked about using a 10' rear lot line instead of multiple rear lot lines. Clausen indicated her lot has a strange shape and asked how it would be handled. Zimmerman said that her lot has two front yards but only one rear yard. E) Rear Yard Setback Trapp reviewed the concerns of residents and outlined the proposed changes. Cera asked if 20% or 25 feet would be greater. Kluchka asked if this would create non- conforming lots. Zimmerman said yes and variances would be needed to expand those structures. Johnson asked why make the setback dependent on depth? Cera replied otherwise a larger lot could get a larger building. Segelbaum indicated the other setbacks were set numbers and not percentages. Trapp said 15 to 40 feet were the precedents from other cities. F) PUDs Minutes of the Joint City Council/Planning Commission February 9, 2015 Page 4 Zimmerman reviewed the concerns of City officials and outlined the proposed changes. Clausen asked if these limits would have impacted the Triton Drive PUD. Cera asked about the size of the Sweeney Lake PUD. Zimmerman replied the Triton Drive PUD was more than 2 acres so would not have been effected. The Sweeney Lake PUD was more than 3 acres. Waldhauser asked why developers want PUDs? Zimmerman replied they offer flexibility. Miller commented on the Construction Management Agreement being developed by staff and pointed out other issues that were not being addressed through the study at this time. Harris asked about the conditions of approval for minor subdivisions and if the group was comfortable leaving the determination of impacts on neighborhoods in the hands of the City Engineer. He also wondered how these changes might have impacted past developments. 2. Adjournment Mayor Harris adjourned the meeting at 10:25 pm. Charles D. Segelbaum, Secretary Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager Joint Meeting of the Golden Valley Environmental Commission, and Open Space and Recreation Commission February 23, 2015 A joint meeting of the Environmental Commission and Open Space and Recreation Commission was held at the Golden Valley City Hall, Council Chambers, 200 Brookview Parkway, Golden Valley, Minnesota, on Monday, February 23, 2015. Chair Jim Stremel called the meeting to order at 7:30 pm. Those present were, Environmental Commissioners Anderson, Gitelis, Hill, Johnson and Stremel; Open Space and Recreation Commissioner Steinberg. Also present was Public Works Specialist Eric Eckman, Park Maintenance Supervisor Al Lundstrom, Administrative Assistant Lisa Nesbitt and Deric Deuschle from Short Elliot Hendrickson (SEH) Approval of Joint Meeting Minutes — November 24, 2014 MOVED by Gitelis, seconded by Anderson and the motion carried unanimously to approve the minutes of the November 24, 2014 joint meeting. Natural Resource Management Plan Eckman opened the discussion with a brief review of the survey findings and then went on to outline the main points within Sections 5 and 6. Comments/suggestions from the commissioners included: • Include the section number in the footer Section 5 • Include a paragraph regarding strategies for dealing with invasive species and invasive pests. Section 6 • Commissioners suggested including the estimated cost for ongoing maintenance for each improvement project listed in the implementation matrix. • Include the need to develop a maintenance schedule, to complete the tree inventory and develop educational topics and schedule. • Include task item to look for available funding Additional comments can be submitted to staff through March 15th MOVED by Gitelis, seconded by Johnson and the motion carried unanimously to approve the draft, as it will be amended. The Plan will be presented at a Council/Manager meeting in April. 3. Adjourn The meeting was adjourned at 9:15 pm. Lisa Nesbitt Administrative Assistant rf ° Item 4A BC`WMC 3-19-15 IWI-11� Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission Minutes of Regular Meeting February 19,2015 Golden Valley City Hall, 8:30 a.m. Commissioners and Staff Present: Crystal Commissioner Guy Mueller, Vice Chair Robbinsdale Michael Scanlan, Alternate Commissioner Golden Valley Commissioner Stacy Hoschka, Treasurer St. Louis Park Commissioner Jim de Lambert, Chair Medicine Lake Commissioner Clint Carlson Administrator Laura Jester Minneapolis Commissioner Michael Welch Attorney Charlie LeFevere, Kennedy & Graven Minnetonka Commissioner Jacob Millner Engineer Karen Chandler, Barr Engineering Co. New Hope Alternate Commissioner Pat Crough Recorder Amy Herbert Plymouth Not represented Technical Advisory Committee(TAC)Members/Other Attendees Present: Derek Asehe,TAC, City of Plymouth Richard McCoy, TAC, City of Robbinsdale Marge Beard, Plymouth City Council Jane McDonald Black,Alternate Commissioner, City of Golden Valley Erick Francis, TAC, City of St. Louis Park Jeff Oliver,TAC, City of Golden Valley Christopher Gise,Golden Valley Resident Bob Paschke,TAC, City of New Hope Jere Gwin-Lenth, Friends of Northwood Lake Jim Prom, Plymouth City Council Gary Holter, Alternate Commissioner, City of Jim Renneberg, City of Plymouth Medicine Lake Chris Long,TAC,City of New Hope Liz Stout,TAC,City of Minnetonka Linda Loomis, Chair, Plan Steering Cmttee Robert White,New Hope Resident 1.CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL On Thursday,February 19,2015, at 8:30 a.m. in the Council Conference room at Golden Valley City Hall, Chair de Lambert called to order the meeting of the Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission (BC W MC) and 1 BCWMC February 19, 2015, Meeting Minutes asked for roll call to be taken. The Cities of Minneapolis, Minnetonka, and Plymouth were absent from the roll call. 2. CITIZEN FORUM ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS No items were raised. 3. AGENDA Administrator Jester requested the addition to the agenda of a resolution to transfer funds to the BCWMC's Administrative fund from its Long-term Maintenance fund. Chair de Lambert added the item to the Business agenda. Commissioner Mueller moved to approve the agenda as amended. Alternate Commissioner Scanlan seconded the motion. Upon a vote,the motion carried 6-0 [City of Plymouth absent from vote]. [Commissioner Millner, Minnetonka, and Commissioner Welch, Minneapolis, arrive at 8:36 a.m.] 4. CONSENT AGENDA Commissioner Welch asked for item 4L- Approval of Vicksburg Lane Reconstruction to be pulled from the Consent Agenda. Chair de Lambert pulled the item from the Consent Agenda and added it to the Business agenda. Alternate Commissioner Scanlan moved to approve the Consent Agenda. Alternate Commissioner Crough seconded the motion. Upon a vote,the motion carried 8-0 [City of Plymouth absent from vote]. [The following items were approved as part of the Consent Agenda: the January 15, 2015, Commission Meeting minutes, the monthly financial report,the payment of the invoices, approval of Resolution 15-03 Designating Depositories for BCWMC Funds, Approval to Designate Finance & Commerce as the Official News Publication of the BCWMC, Approval of Agreement with Shingle Creek WMC for Participation of West Metro Water Alliance(WMWA),Approval of Reimbursement Request from Channel Maintenance Fund by City of Golden Valley,Approval to Set TAC Meeting for March 5, 2015, Order Preparation of 2014 Annual Report, Approval of Press Release on Bassett Creek Water Quality Monitoring Report, Approval to Execute Agreement with Metropolitan Council for Participation in 2015 Watershed Outlet Monitoring Program(WOMP) Pending Approval by BCWMC Legal Counsel]. The general and construction account balances reported in the Fiscal Year 2015 Financial Report prepared for the February 19,2015, meeting are as follows: Checking Account Balance $734,765.24 TOTAL GENERAL, FUND BALANCE; $734,765.24 TOTAL CASH & INVESTMENTS ON- $3,406,800.83 HAND (2/11/15) CIP Projects Levied— Budget Remaining ($2,674,831.87) Closed Projects Remaining Balance $731,968.96 2013 Anticipated Tax Levy Revenue $15,251.02 2 BCWMC February 19, 2015, Meeting Minutes 2014 Anticipated Tax Levy Revenue $11,262.26 Anticipated Closed Project Balance $758,482.24 5. ORGANIZATIONAL MEETING A. Appoint Officers Chair de Lambert opened up the floor for nominations. Alternate Commissioner Crough moved to appoint the current slate of officers to continue in their roles. Commissioner Mueller seconded the motion. Upon a vote, the motion carried 7-0 [Cities of Minneapolis and Plymouth absent from vote]. B. Appoint Committee Members i. Administrative Services Committee Administrator Jester described the role of this committee. Commissioner Mueller moved to appoint Commissioners Mueller, Millner, and de Lambert, and Alternate Commissioners Crough, and Tobelmann to the Administrative Services Committee. Alternate Commissioner Crough seconded the motion. Upon a vote,the motion carried 8-0 [City of Plymouth absent frorn vote]. H. Budget Committee Administrator Jester described the role of this committee. Commissioner Millner moved to appoint Commissioners Mueller, Hoschka, Carlson, Millner, and de Lambert to the Budget Committee. Commissioner Welch seconded the motion. Upon a vote, the motion carried 8-0 [City of Plymouth absent from vote]. iii. Education Committee Administrator Jester described the role of this committee; Chair de Lambert stressed the importance of this committee and volunteers for outreach events. Commissioner Mueller moved to appoint Commissioners Hoschka and Millner,Alternate Commissioners McDonald Black, Goddard, and Tobelmann, and former Commissioner Dan Johnson to the Education Committee, Alternate Commissioner Crough seconded the motion. Upon a vote,the motion carried 8-0 [City of Plymouth absent from vote]. [Later in the meeting Commissioner Welch said that heard from Alternate Commissioner Goddard that she does not want to be appointed to the Education Committee.] Administrator Jester was directed to contact former Commissioners Thornton and Langsdorf to find out their interest in participating on the committee or at outreach events. iv. Next Generation Plan Steering Committee Commissioner Welch moved to appoint Linda Loomis, Commissioners Mueller, Carlson, Welch, Black and Alternate Commissioners Goddard, Crough,and Tobelmann to the Next Generation Plan Steering Committee. Alternate Commissioner Michael Scanlan seconded the motion.mon a vote, the motion carried 8-0 [City of Plymouth absent from vote]. Jim Prom requested to be added to the email list for this committee's meeting notifications. Administrator Jester was directed to contact Commissioners Ginny Black and Wayne Sicora regarding their desired committee appointments. 3 BCWMC February 19, 2015, Meeting Minutes C. Review Year-End Financial Status and 2015 Budget Administrator Jester summarized the BCWMC's fiscal year 2014 year-end financial status. She reported that the year ended with a surplus of$20,000, including a$10,000 surplus in the Commission's 2014 Engineering budget. Administrator Jester noted that later in the meeting the Commission will take action to transfer $17,000 from its Long-term Maintenance account to its Administrative account, increasing the overall budget surplus to$37,000. Administrator Jester provided a brief review of the BCWMC's 2015 budget. She pointed out some differences in the format of the budget and noted the 2015 budget for website updates. Engineer Chandler asked about the line item listed as Watershed-wide P8 water quality model. She stated that the budget for the annual update of the P8 water quality model is included in the TMDL implementation reporting budget. Administrator Jester said she will ask the Deputy Treasurer to remove the Watershed-wide P8 water quality model line item from the financial report. Commissioner Welch requested that the line item be included as a footnote. There was a short discussion about the budget for digitizing the Commission's files. Commissioner Welch requested that the Plan Steering Committee add to its agenda a discussion of any engineering gaps in the Next Generation Plan. He explained that he thinks the Commission did very little analysis of watershed needs and assessment of status and prioritization. Commissioner Welch said that in light of funds remaining in the Commission's Next Generation Plan budget,there should be a Committee discussion of whether there are gaps that should be addressed. D. Receive Overview of Open Meeting Law Attorney LeFevere provided a detailed overview of the Open Meeting Law, described the legal penalties for violations of the Open Meeting Law,talked about the BCWMC's League of Minnesota Cities Insurance'Trust coverage, and answered questions. He reminded the group to be cautious, practical, and transparent. 6. BUSINESS A. Receive Update on Comments from 60-Day Review of Watershed Management Plan Administrator Jester reported that the review period concluded in the end of January. She reported that the BCWMC received comments from the state agencies,the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board,the Association of Medicine Lake Area Citizens (AMLAC), the City of Minneapolis, and the Plymouth Environmental (duality Commission. She said that the BCWMC received many commendations from state agencies. She said that the comments also indicated that the BCWMC needs more detail in its CIP, and she said that the TAC will discuss this. Administrator Jester said that there were a few questions about buffers and about a few policies. Administrator Jester said that the Commission is required to respond to all comments and staff will work on preparing draft responses. She indicated the TAC and Plan Steering Committee would be meeting to discuss comments and appropriate responses. She said that the plan is to have the draft response to comments ready for the Commission to discuss at its April meeting. Administrator Jester explained that after the response to comments are sent out there needs to be a public hearing no sooner than 10-days after the response to comments are sent out. She said that the public hearing would likely be at the Commission's May meeting and then the Plan would go into the 90-day review. Administrator Jester pointed out that this timeline would mean that the Commission would meet its October 1,2015, deadline for adopting its final plan and would be eligible to apply for Clean Water Fund grants. 4 BCWMC February 19, 2015, Meeting Minutes B. Consider Approval of 90% Design Plans for Schaper Pond Diversion Project (SL-3) Mr. Oliver provided background on the project. Engineer Chandler reminded the Commission that it approved the 50%design plans in December. She said that at today's meeting the City of Golden Valley is asking the Commission to approve the 90%design plans and to authorize the City to proceed with the project to construction. Using a PowerPoint presentation she walked the Commission through the project and the 90% design set. She mentioned that a change between the 50% design plans and the 90%design plans is that they no longer plan to remove part of the existing berm/dike that extends down from the north as it would have resulted in too many wetland impacts and therefore would be in violation of the Army Corps of Engineers general permit. Engineer Chandler reported that the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA)has communicated that it will accept this project as a reduction in wasteload allocation for the Sweeney Lake TMDL. She said that the permit applications have been submitted to the Department of Natural Resources for the public waters permit and the Wetland Conservation Act permit. She talked about the Army Corps of Engineers general permit and said that under the permit, the total wetland impacts, including temporary and permanent, need to be less than 2,000 square feet. She talked about obtaining city permits for erosion and sediment control and right-of-way. Commissioner Mueller asked about maintenance requirements of the project. Engineer Chandler talked about annual inspections, cleaning out trash, the possibility that the bottom of the curtain would need to be dug out of bottom sediment, and pond dredging. Mr. Oliver responded that the City estimates that dredging would need to occur on a 10-to 15-year timeframe. Mr. Oliver explained that the City is the property owner and will be talking to the Sweeney Lake residents and the public about this project as the project nears construction. Mr. Oliver said that he recommends that the next monitoring of Sweeney Lake take place in two years, and Engineer Chandler said that the next scheduled monitoring for Sweeney Lake is 2017. Commissioner floschka moved to approve the 90%design plans and to authorize the City to move forward with construction. Alternate Commissioner Mueller seconded the motion. Upon a vote,the motion carried 8-0 [City of Plymouth absent from vote]. C. Receive Presentation on 2014 Twin and Sweeney Lake Monitoring Results Engineer Chandler provided a detailed PowerPoint presentation on the results of the water quality monitoring that Barr Engineering did for Twin Lake and Sweeney Lake in 2014 on behalf of the BCWMC. She described the water quality parameters that were monitored and the biotic monitoring conducted. Engineer Chandler gave background information on the lakes including their size in acres, maximum depth, and littoral area. Talking about Sweeney Lake, Engineer Chandler reported on the summer averages of phosphorous in different parts of the lake and compared those averages to the MPCA's/BCWMC's standards. She summarized that on average the water quality data for the north basin of the lake is better than the data for the south basin. She addressed the spikes in phosphorous and chlorophyll a levels during the summer. Engineer Chandler described Sweeney Lake's biota, noting that the lake has an average number of plant species and an average quality plant community. She reported that three invasive plant species were found including curlyleaf pondweed, purple loosestrife, and reed canary grass. Engineer Chandler summarized the results of the phytoplankton analysis and described how the algae blooms in Sweeney Lake were due to the phosphorous spikes. She reported there were blue-green algae blooms, including toxin-producing species, in June, July, and September and there were green algae blooms in August. Engineer Chandler also summarized the zooplankton results. Engineer Chandler said that the Commission Engineer recommends the Commission continue monitoring this 5 HCWMC February 19, 2015, Meeting Minutes lake and that the next scheduled monitoring is in 2017, which is good timing due to the Schaper Pond project. She also said the Commission Engineer recommends continued implementation of the Sweeney Lake TMDL, including construction of Schaper Pond, other watershed projects, and in-lake alum treatment(after construction of Schaper Pond). Before implementing an in-lake alum treatment,the Commission Engineer recommends the Commission consider performing a study regarding the impact of the current aeration system on Sweeney Lake water quality. Commissioner Welch asked if phosphorous reductions were being maximized when redevelopment occurs in the watershed of Sweeney Lake, Engineer Chandler responded yes and said that if the Schaper Pond improvements are successful the Commission will have reached enough of its watershed phosphorous load reductions for Sweeney Lake to go forward with an in-lake alum treatment,There was discussion, and Engineer Chandler responded to questions. Talking about Twin Lake, Engineer Chandler provided background information on the lake, noting that the southern half of the lake is located in Wirth Park. She reported that the lake's summer average phosphorous met the BCWMC's standard. She pointed out that right after ice out the phosphorous levels in Twin Lake were 60 micrograms per liter(after spring mixing), but the summer average was 18 micrograms per liter. Engineer Chandler provided information on chlorophyll a in the lake,transparency, and the lake's ecosystem/biota. She stated that the number of plant species in Twin lake doubled from 12 in 1992 to 24 in 2014. She said that lake has an average quality plant community and coontail is the most prevalent plant species in the lake. Engineer Chandler reported that the lake has three invasive plant species: curlyleaf pondweed, purple loosestrife, and reed canary grass. No management of curlyleaf pondweed and reed canary grass beyond monitoring is needed, but management of purple loosestrife is recommended (the city or homeowners groups could consider releasing loosestrife eating beetles.). She said that the lake had relatively low numbers of algae in 2014 and healthy zooplankton. Engineer Chandler provided the Commission Engineer's recommendations for Twin Lake, including continued monitoring of the lake(the next scheduled monitoring is in 2017), in-lake alum treatment(to be completed in 2015), and control of purple loosestrife. D. Review Results of Staff Performance Evaluations Commissioner Mueller announced that the performance evaluations were summarized and the results are presented in the summary document that was distributed at the meeting. He described the evaluation process, the number of responses received, the evaluation results and comments, and the meetings with staff to review the results. Commissioner Welch commented that it would be helpful if Commissioner Mueller would delineate the results between commissioner responses and non-commissioner responses. [Commissioner Millner departs the meeting at 10:55 a.m.] E. Approval of Vicksburg Lane Reconstruction Commissioner Welch said that the information provided by the Commission Engineer concludes that it doesn't appear this project entails work in wetlands and that the City of Plymouth is the Local Governmental Unit(LGU) for the Wetland Conservation Act. He said that it is his expectation that the Commission knows whether projects do or do not entail work in wetlands. Engineer Chandler stated that the Commission doesn't get involved in reviewing the wetland impacts because the City is the LGU, but from what the Commission Engineer did review, it does not appear that there are wetland impacts. Mr. Asche stated that the project has incidental wetland impacts comprised of impacts to wetlands in front of some culverts, He said that the City of Plymouth did notice the Commission of those impacts as part of the City's typical procedure. Engineer Chandler said that even though the Commission is not the LGU, the Commission Engineer can review such projects in further detail for wetland impacts if the Commission wants. Commissioner Welch said yes, he 6 BCWMC February 19, 2015, Meeting Minutes would like that. Commissioner Welch moved to approve the Vicksburg Lane Reconstruction. Alternate Commissioner Scanlan seconded the motion. Upon a vote,the motion carried 7-0 [Cities of Minnetonka and Plymouth absent from vote]. Commissioner Hoschka suggested that items that are pulled from the Consent Agenda be addressed immediately after the Consent Agenda. F. Consider Approval of Technical Advisory Committee Recommendations Erick Francis reported that the TAC recommends that the Commission continue with Barr Engineering as its Commission Engineer. Commissioner Clint Carlson commented on an item reflected in the minutes from TAC meeting. He said that an issue was raised by the City of Golden Valley when Mr. Oliver was talking about the Blue Line and working with the Metropolitan Council. Mr. Carlson said that he thinks there is an opportunity to further the Commission's XP-SWMM model by leveraging cooperation with the Met Council and their modeling efforts in this area. Commissioner Carlson said he emphasizes this because he would like the Met Council modeling to dovetail with any future Commission modeling. Commissioner Carlson stated that he would like to see the Commission indicate support of the partnership between the Commission and the Met Council and for the TAC to discuss this opportunity. Commissioner Carlson moved that the Commission acknowledges support of a partnership with the Met Council to make best use of the opportunity arising from the Blue Line in terms of modeling that area. Alternate Commissioner Scanlan seconded the motion. Chair de Lambert said that the TAC is planning to discuss the XP-SWMM at its March meeting. Commissioner Welch remarked that previously the Commission acted to direct Jeff Oliver to communicate back to the Commission about this issue and to engage the Commission Engineer as necessary. He said that he hears Commissioner Carlson's motion as emphasizing the importance of that coordination and no further commitment of funding. Commissioner Carlson indicated consent. Upon a vote,the motion carried 6-0 [City of St. Louis Park abstained. Cities of Minnetonka and Plymouth absent from vote]. Chair de Lambert said he abstained and will wait for the TAC's recommendation at the next Commission meeting. Alternate Commissioner Michael Scanlan moved to accept the IAC's recommendation of keeping Barr Engineering Company as the Commission Engineer. Alternate Commissioner Pat Crough seconded the motion. Commissioner Welch said that he is not going to vote on this motion if it is perceived to be contracting on a two-year contract with the Engineer because he doesn't think the Commission should do that without seeing the proposals. He said that he accepts the TAC recommendation. Attorney LeFevere said that this action is not a change in contract and is not a commitment for a two-year contract but is an action to not change anything. Upon a vote,the motion carried 6-1 [City of Minneapolis voted against the motion. Cities of Minnetonka and Plymouth absent from vote]. [Commissioner Hoschka departs the meeting at 11:32 a.m.] 7 BCWMC February 19, 2015, Meeting Minutes G. Consider Clean Water Partnership Grant Application for Northwood Lake Improvement Project i. Resolution to Submit Application Administrator Jester explained that the City of New Hope did not receive a BWSR Clean Water Fund grant or Hennepin County grant for the Northwood Lake Improvement Project. She said that the Commission agreed to levy up to$1.1 million for this project and the City of New Hope is contributing at least$206,000 for the project. She stated that the Commission is hoping to secure grant funds to reduce the Commission's funding of the project. Administrator Jester reported that she has started an application for a Clean Water Partnership grant through the MPGA and is wondering if the Commission would like her to continue working on that application, which is due March 6. She said that it will take her some time to complete the application along with some work time from the Commission Engineer and the City Engineer. Commissioner Mueller moved to approve staff applying for the grant. Commissioner Carlson seconded the motion. There was discussion. The Commission clarified that this Clean Water Partnership grant should be for the projects' Option A and Option C as a complete package. Chris Long added that the City of New Hope plans to reapply for the Clean Water Fund grant and the Hennepin County grant for this project but said it would be worth discussing whether the application should come from the City or the watershed. Administrator Jester agreed that this should be discussed before applying for those grants. Upon a vote,the motion carried 5-0 [Cities of Golden Valley, Minnetonka, Plymouth, and Robbinsdale absent from vote]. lAlternate Commissioner Scanlan departs the meeting at 11:35 a.m.] H. Resolution 15-05 Transfer of Funds from Long-term Maintenance Fund to Administrative Fund Administrator Jester summarized that Resolution 15-05 authorizes the transfer of$17,000 from the BCWMC's Long-term Maintenance Fund to its Administrative Fund to cover the costs of flood control project expenses in 2014. Commissioner Welch moved to adopt Resolution 15-05. Commissioner Mueller seconded the motion. Upon a vote,the motion carried 5-0 [Cities of Golden Valley, Minnetonka, Plymouth, and Robbinsdale absent from vote]. [Commissioner Welch departs the meeting at 1]:40 a.m.] I. Receive Update on Major Plan Amendment Comments and Timeline Administrator Jester reported that the Commission received no comments on its proposed Major Plan Amendment and that the Commission will hold a public hearing on the proposed major plan amendment at the BCWMC's March meeting. 7. COMMUNICATIONS A. Administrator: No Administrator Communications B. Chair: No Chair Communications C. Commissioners: No Commissioner Communications D. TAC Members: No TAC Communications 8 BCWMC February 19, 2015, Meeting Minutes E. Committees: No Committee Communications F. Legal Counsel: No Legal Communications G. Engineer: No Engineer Communications 8. INFORMATION ONLY (Available at http://www.bassettereckwmo.org/Meetings/2015/2015- February/2015FebruaryMeetingPacket.htm) A. CIP Project Update Chart B. BCWMC Review of Proposed Revisions to Golden Valley Comp Plan C. 2014 NEMO Program & Video Interviews of Participants D. 2014 River Watch Report E. Grant Tracking Summary and Spreadsheet F. Clean Water Fund Grant Report for CR2012 Main Stem Restoration Project 9. ADJOURNMENT Chair de Lambert adjourned the Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission Regular Meeting at 11:42 a,m. Amy Herbert, Recorder Date Secretary Date 9 city, 90tae",I!,k,40N D valley Physical Development Department 763-593-8030/763-593-3988(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting April 7, 2015 Agenda Item 3. E. 1. Approve Cooperative Agreement with the Minnesota Department of Transportation for Construction of the TH 55 & Winnetka Avenue Intersection Improvement Project Prepared By Jeff Oliver, PE, City Engineer Eric Seaburg, EIT, Engineer Summary In 2013, by City Council resolution, the City applied for MnDOT Metro Municipal Agreement Program (MMAP) funding for the TH 55 & Winnetka Avenue Intersection Improvement Project. The program provides funds for construction projects that are developed and administered by local agencies and provide benefit to both the local community and the trunk highway system. In 2014, the City was notified that it was awarded MMAP funds for the project. Over the past year, staff and its consultants have been working with MnDOT and Hennepin County to develop final plans for the project. The project will include an expansion of the intersection, conversion of the intersection to dual opposing left turns for northbound and southbound traffic, upgraded pedestrian amenities, watermain replacement, and replacement of the traffic signal system. Once completed, traffic congestion at the intersection will be improved, particularly in the morning and afternoon peak hours. The City was awarded MMAP funds in the amount of$588,500 for the project. Over the course of final design, additional work was added to the project scope by MnDOT. As such, MnDOT funding for the project has increased to $638,500. Additionally, Hennepin County will now be participating in construction in the amount $71,500 towards the replacement of the signal system. Final estimated project costs and funding amounts are shown below: Estimated Project Costs $1,885,000 City of Golden Valley Funding (62%) $1,175,000 MnDOT Funding (34%) $638,500 Hennepin County Funding (4%) $71,500 The City will be funding its share of the project through its Minnesota State Aid construction allotment. Attachments • Resolution Authorizing Cooperative Construction Agreement with the State of Minnesota Transportation Department (1 page) • State of Minnesota Department of Transportation and City of Golden Valley cooperative Construction Agreement (9 pages) Recommended Action Motion to adopt the Resolution Authorizing Cooperative Construction Agreement with the State of Minnesota Transportation Department. Resolution 15-26 April 7, 2015 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING COOPERATIVE CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT WITH THE STATE OF MINNESOTA TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT IT IS RESOLVED that the City of Golden Valley may enter into MnDOT Agreement No. 04853 with the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation for the following purposes: To provide for payment by the State to the City of the State's share of the costs for grading, concrete curb and gutter, traffic signal, bituminous paving, storm sewer construction, and other associated construction to be performed upon, along, and adjacent to Trunk Highway No. 55 and Winnetka Avenue intersection within the corporate City limits under State Project No. 2723-127. IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and the City Manager are authorized to execute the Agreement and any amendments to the Agreement. Shepard M. Harris, Mayor CERTIFICATION I certify that the above Resolution is an accurate copy of the Resolution adopted by the Council of the City of Golden Valley at an authorized meeting hold on the 7th day of April, 2015, as shown by the minutes of the meeting in my possession. ATTEST: Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by the City Clerk. MnDOT Contract No: 04853 STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION And CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY COOPERATIVE CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT State Project Number(S.P.): 2723-127 Original Amount Encumbered Trunk Highway Number(T.H.): 55=188 5638,500.00 State Aid Number(S.A.P.): 128-331-006 State Aid Number(S.A.P.): 128-020-015 State Aid Number(S.A.P.): 027-756-020 Lighting System Feed Point No. City Signal System ID 20863 This Agreement is between the State of Minnesota,acting through its Commissioner of Transportation("State")and City of Golden Valley acting through its City Council("City"). Recitals 1. The City will perform excavation,grading,ADA improvements concrete curb and gutter,signal,bituminous paving,storm sewer,sanitary sewer repair and water main replacement construction and other associated construction upon,along and adjacent to Trunk Highway No. 55 and Winnetka Avenue intersection according to City prepared plans,specifications and special provisions designated by the City as Improvement Project No. 12-03 and by the State as State Project No.2723-127(T.H. 55=188)("Project");and 2. The City requests the State participate in the costs of the grading,ADA improvements,concrete curb and gutter,traffic signal,bituminous paving and storm sewer construction and the State is willing to participate in the costs of said construction and associated construction engineering;and 3. Agreement 58350 between the State,City of Golden Valley and Hennepin County addresses traffic control signal maintenance at T.H.55 and Winnetka Avenue/C.S.A.H.No. 156;and 4. Minnesota Statutes§ 161.20,subdivision 2 authorizes the Commissioner of Transportation to make arrangements with and cooperate with any governmental authority for the purposes of constructing, maintaining and improving the trunk highway system. Agreement 1. Term of Agreement; Survival of Terms;Plans; 1.1. Effective date. This Agreement will be effective on the date the State obtains all signatures required by Minnesota Statutes§ 16C.05,subdivision 2. 1.2. Expiration date.This Agreement will expire when all obligations have been satisfactorily fulfilled. 1.3. Survival of term& All clauses which impose obligations continuing in their nature and which must survive in order to give effect to their meaning will survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement, including,without limitation,the following clauses: 2.4. State Ownership of Improvements;5.Maintenance by the City; 10,Liability;Worker Compensation Claims;Insurance; 12. State Audits; 13.Government Data Practices; 14.Governing Law;Jurisdiction;Venue;and 16.Force Majeure. The terms and conditions set forth in Article 6. Signal System Operation and Maintenance will survive the expiration of this Agreement, but may be terminated by another Agreement between the parties. -1- Payable Lump Sum(Municipal Agreements) MnDOT Contract No: 04853 1.4. Plans,Specifications,Special Provisions. State-approved City plans,specifications and special provisions designated by the City as Improvement Project No. 12-03 and by the State as State Project No.2723-127 (T.H, 55=188)are on file in the office of the City's Engineer and incorporated into this Agreement by reference.("Project Plans") 2. Right-of-Way Use 2.1. Limited Right to Occupy,The State grants to the City(and its contractors and consultants)the right to occupy trunk highway right-of-way as necessary to perform the work described in the Project Plans. This right is limited to the purpose of constructing the project,and administering such construction,and may be revoked by the State at any time,with or without cause, Cause for revoking this right of occupancy includes,but is not limited to,breaching the terms of this or any other agreement(relevant to this project) with the State,failing to provide adequate traffic control or other safety measures,failing to perform the construction properly and in a timely manner,and failing to observe applicable environmental laws or terms of applicable permits. The State will have no liability to the City(or its contractors or consultants)for revoking this right of occupancy. 2.2. State Access,Suspension of Work;Remedial Measures.The State's District Engineer or assigned representative retains the right to enter and inspect the trunk highway right-of-way(including the construction being performed on such right-of-way)at any time and without notice to the City or its contractor. If the State determines(in its sole discretion)that the construction is not being performed in a proper or timely manner,or that environmental laws(or the terms of permits)are not being complied with, or that traffic control or other necessary safety measures arc not being properly implemented,then the State may direct the City(and its contractor)to take such remedial measures as the State deems necessary, The State may require the City(and its contractors and consultants)to suspend their operations until suitable remedial action plans are approved and implemented. The State will have no liability to the City(or its contractors or consultants)for exercising its rights under this provision. 2.3. Traffic Control; Worker Safety, While the City(and its contractors and consultants)are occupying the State right-of-way,they must comply with the approved traffic control plan,and with applicable provisions of the Work Zone Field Handbook(httD://www.dot.state.mn.us/trafficeng/workzone/index.html}. All City, contractor,and consultant personnel occupying the State's right-of-way must be provided with required reflective clothing and hats. 2.4. State Ownership of Improvements. The State will retain ownership of its trunk highway right-of-way, including any improvements made to such right-of-way under this Agreement,unless otherwise noted. The warranties and guarantees made by the City's contractor with respect to such improvements(if any)will flow to the State. The City will assist the State,as necessary,to enforce such warranties and guarantees,and to obtain recovery from the City's consultants,and contractor(including its sureties)for non-performance of contract work,for design errors and omissions,and for defects in materials and workmanship. Upon request of the State,the City will undertake such actions as are reasonably necessary to transfer or assign contract rights to the State and to permit subrogation by the State with respect to claims against the City's consultants and contractors. 3. Contract Award and Construction 3.1. Bids and Award The City will receive bids and award a construction contract to the lowest responsible bidder(or best value proposer),subject to concurrence by the State in that award,according to the Project Plans. The contract construction will be performed according to the Project Plans, 3.2. Bid Documents furnished by the City.The City will,within 7 days of opening bids for the construction contract,submit to the State's District/State Aad Agreements Engineer a copy of the low bid and an abstract of all bids together with the City's request for concurrence by the State in the award of the construction contract. The City will not award the construction contract until the State advises the City in writing of its concurrence. -2- Payable Lump Sum(Municipal Agreements) MnDOT Contract No: 04853 3.3. Rejection of Bids The City may reject and the State may require the City to reject any or all bids for the construction contract. The party rejecting or requiring the rejection of bids must provide the other party written notice of that rejection or requirement for rejection no later than 30 days after opening bids. Upon the rejection of all bids,a party may request,in writing,that the bidding process be repeated. Upon the other party's written approval of such request,the City will repeat the bidding process in a reasonable period of time,without cost or expense to the State. 3.4. Direction,Supervision and Inspection of Construction A. The contract construction will be under the direction of the City and under the supervision of a registered professional engineer;however,the State participation construction covered under this Agreement will be open to inspection by the State District Engineer's authorized representatives. The City will give the District/State Aid Agreements Engineer at Roseville five days notice of its intention to start the contract construction. B. Responsibility for the control of materials for the contract construction will be on the City and its contractor and will be carried out according to Specifications No. 1601 through and including No. 1609 in the State's current"Standard Specifications for Construction". 3.5. Contaminated Soils and Groundwater within the State's Cost Participation Limits A. 24 Hour Notification. The City will notify the State District Engineer's authorized representative a minimum of 24 hours prior to the contractor beginning the excavation and removal of any contaminated soils that have been identified within the Project limits. B. Immediate Notification. The City will notify the State District Engineer's authorized representative immediately upon the contractor encountering contaminated soils and/or groundwater in areas that are within the Project limits. The City will confer with the State as to the handling,disposal,and any other issues related to contaminated materials found on State Right-of-Way or import of materials onto State Right-of-Way. C. Environmental Consultant. The City will provide for an Environmental Consultant to be on site to observe and document the excavation,handling and disposal of contaminated soils that have been identified within the Project limits. If the contractor encounters contaminated materials in areas not previously identified and upon notification by the City to MnDOT,the City hired Environmental Consultant will be provided to collect and analyze soil and/or groundwater samples to determine contaminant levels,work with the landfill for disposal of the soil waste,and provide oversight of any soil and groundwater handling and disposal. The City will not allow the contractor to excavate any contaminated soil unless the Environmental Consultant is present. 3.6. Completion of Construction. The City will cause the contract construction to be started and completed according to the time schedule in the construction contract special provisions. The completion date for the contract construction may be extended,by an exchange of letters between the appropriate City official and the State District Engineer's authorized representative,for unavoidable delays encountered in the performance of the contract construction. 3.7. Plan Changes All changes in the Project Plans and all addenda,change orders and supplemental agreements entered into by the City and its contractor for contract construction must be approved in writing by the State District Engineer's authorized representative. 3.8. Compliance with Laws,Ordinances,Regulations. The City will comply and cause its contractor to comply with all Federal, State and Local laws,and all applicable ordinances and regulations. With respect only to that portion of work performed on the State's trunk highway right-of-way,the City will not require the contractor to follow local ordinances or to obtain local permits. -3- Payable Lump Sum(Municipal Agreements) MnDOT Contract No: 04853 3.9. Construction Documents Furnished by the City. The City will keep records and accounts that enable it to provide the State,when requested,with the following: A. Copies of the City contractor's invoice(s)covering all contract construction. B. Copies of the endorsed and canceled City warrant(s)or check(s)paying for final contract construction,or computer documentation of the warrant(s)issued,certified by an appropriate City official that final construction contract payment has been made. C. Copies of all construction contract change orders and supplemental agreements. D. A certification form,provided by the State,signed by the City's Engineer in charge of the contract construction attesting to the following: 1. Satisfactory performance and completion of all contract construction according to the Project Plans. li. Acceptance and approval of all materials furnished for the contract construction relative to compliance of those materials to the State's current"Standard Specifications for Construction". iii. Full payment by the City to its contractor for all contract construction. E. Copies,certified by the City's Engineer,of material sampling reports and of material testing results for the materials furnished for the contract construction. F. A copy of the"as built"plan sent to the District/State Aid Agreements Engineer, 4. Right-of-Way;Easements;Permits 4.1. The City will,without cost or expense to the State,obtain all rights-of-way,easements,construction permits and any other permits and sanctions that may be required in connection with the local and trunkk highway portions of the contract construction. Before payment by the State,the City will furnish the State with certified copies of the documents for rights-of-way and easements,construction permits and other permits and sanctions required for State participation construction covered under this Agreement. 4.2. The City will convey to the State by quit claim deed,all newly acquired rights needed for the continuing operation and maintenance of the Trunk Highway,if any,upon completion of the Project,at no cost or expense to the State. 4.3. The City will comply with Minnesota Statutes§216D.04,subdivision I(a),for identification,notification, design meetings and depiction of utilities affected by the contract construction. 4.4. The City will submit to the State's Utility Engineer an original permit application for all utilities owned by the City of Golden Valley to be constructed upon and within the trunk highway right-of-way. Applications for permits will be made on State form"Application for Utility Permit on Trunk Highway Right Of Way" (Form TP2525). 5. Maintenance by the City Upon completion of the project,the City will provide the following without cost or expense to the State: 5.1. Storm Sewers. Routine maintenance of any storm sewer facilities construction. Routine maintenance includes,but is not Iimited to,removal of sediment,debris,vegetation and ice from structures,grates and pipes;repair of minor erosion problems;minor structure repair;and any other maintenance activities necessary to preserve the facilities and to prevent conditions such as flooding,erosion,sedimentation or accelerated deterioration of the facilities. 5.2. Municipal Utilities. Maintenance of any municipal-owned utilities construction,without cost or expense to the State. 5.3. Sidewalks. Maintenance of any sidewalk construction,including stamped and colored concrete sidewalk(if any)and pedestrian ramps. Maintenance includes,but is not limited to,snow, ice and debris removal, -4- Payable Lump Sum(Municipal Agreements) MnDOT Contract No: 04853 patching,crack repair,panel replacement,cross street pedestrian crosswalk markings,vegetation control of boulevards(if any) and any other maintenance activities necessary to perpetuate the sidewalks in a safe, useable,and aesthetically acceptable condition. 5.4. Bikeways/Shared Use Paths. Maintenance of any bikeways and shared use paths construction. Maintenance includes,but is not limited to,snow and ice control/removal,sweeping and debris removal, patching,crack repair,pavement replacement,vegetation control,signing,pavement markings,and any other maintenance activities necessary to perpetuate the bikeways and shared use paths in a safe and usable condition. 5.5. Trail Lighting.Maintenance and ownership of any lighting facilities construction. Maintenance of electrical lighting systems includes everything within the system,from the point of attachment to the power source or utility,to the last light on the feed point,including but not limited to re-lamping of lighting units or replacing of LED luminaires,repair or replacement of all damaged luminaire glassware,loose connections,luminaires when damaged or when ballasts fail,photoelectric control on luminaires,defective starter boards or drivers,damaged fuse holders,blown fuses,knocked down poles including wiring within the poles,damaged poles,pullboxes,underground wire,damaged foundations,equipment pad,installation of approved splices or replacement of wires,repair or extending of conduit,lighting cabinet maintenance including photoelectric cell,electrical distribution system,Gopher State One Call(GSOC)locates and painting of poles and other equipment.The City will be responsible for the hook up cost and application to secure an adequate power supply to the service pad or pole and will pay all monthly electrical service expenses necessary to operate the lighting facility. 5.6. Additional Drainage.Neither party to this Agreement will drain any additional drainage volume into the storm sewer facilities constructed under the construction contract that was not included in the drainage for which the storm sewer facilities were designed,without first obtaining written permission to do so from the other party. The drainage areas served by the storm sewer facilities constructed under the construction contract are shown in a drainage area map,EXHIBIT"Drainage Area",which is on file in the office of the State's District Hydraulics Engineer/Unit at Roseville and is incorporated into this Agreement by reference. 6. Signal System Operation and Maintenance All operation and maintenance terms,including timing and power provisions,in Traffic Control Signal Agreement No.58350 dated November 11, 1976,for the existing traffic control signals on T.H. 55 at Winnetka Avenue/C.S.A.H. 156 will remain in full force and effect. 6.1. Right of Way Access.Each party authorizes the other party to enter upon their respective public right of way to perform the maintenance activities described in this Agreement 6.2. State Furnished Materials. The State will furnish cabinets and controllers("State Furnished Materials"), according to the Project Plans,to operate the traffic control signal system covered under this Agreement, 7. State Cost and Payment by the State 7.1. State Cost.$638,500.00 is the State's full and complete lump sum cost for grading,ADA improvements, concrete curb and gutter,traffic signal,bituminous paving and storm sewer construction which includes associated construction engineering. 7.2. Conditions of Payment The State will pay the City the full and complete lump sum amount or the total cost of the contract construction as shown in the awarded contract bid document plus an 8 percent construction engineering cost share,whichever amount is smaller,after the following conditions have been met: A. Encumbrance by the State of the State's full and complete State funded lump sum cost share. B. Approval by the State's Land Management Director at St.Paul of certified documentation,submitted by the City,for all right-of-way and easement acquisitions required for the contract construction. -5- Payable Lump Sum(Municipal Agreements) MnDOT Contract No: 04853 C. Execution of this Agreement and transmittal to the City,including a letter advising of the State's concurrence in the award of the construction contract. D. The State's receipt of a written request from the City for the advancement of funds. The request will include certification by the City that all necessary parties have executed the construction contract. 7.3. Limitations of State Payment;No State Payment to Contractor The State's participation in the contract construction is limited to the lump sum amount shown in Article 7.1,and the State's participation will not change except by a mutually agreed written amendment to this Agreement. The State's payment obligation extends only to the City. The City's contractor is not intended to be and will not be deemed to be a third party beneficiary of this Agreement. The City's contractor will have no right to receive payment from the State. The State will have no responsibility for claims asserted against the City by the City's contractor. 8. Authorized Representatives Each party's Authorized Representative is responsible for administering this Agreement and is authorized to give and receive any notice or demand required or permitted by this Agreement. 8.1. The State's Authorized Representative will be: Name/Title: Maryanne Kelly-Sonnek,Municipal Agreements Engineer (or successor) Address: 395 John Ireland Boulevard,Mailstop 682,St.Paul,MN 55155 Telephone: (651)366-4634 E-Mail: maryanne.kellysonnek@state.mn.us 8.2. The City's Authorized Representative will be: Name/Title: Jeffrey Oliver/City Engineer (or successor) Address: 7800 Golden Valley Road,Golden Valley,MN 55427 Telephone: 763-593-8034 E-Mail: joliver@goldenvalleymn.gov 9. Assignment;Amendments;Waiver;Contract Complete 9.1. Assignment. Neither party may assign or transfer any rights or obligations under this Agreement without the prior consent of the other party and a written assignment agreement,executed and approved by the same parties who executed and approved this Agreement,or their successors in office. 9.2. Amendments Any amendment to this Agreement must be in writing and will not be effective until it has been executed and approved by the same parties who executed and approved the original Agreement,or their successors in office. 9.3. Waiver. If a party fails to enforce any provision of this Agreement,that failure does not waive the provision or the party's right to subsequently enforce it. 9.4. Contract Complete. This Agreement contains all prior negotiations and agreements between the State and the City.No other understanding regarding this Agreement,whether written or oral,may be used to bind either party. 10. Liability;Worker Compensation Claims;Insurance 10.1.Each party is responsible for its own acts,omissions and the results thereof to the extent authorized by law and will not be responsible for the acts and omissions of others and the results thereof. Minnesota Statutes §3.736 and other applicable law govern liability of the State. Minnesota Statutes Chapter 466 and other applicable law govern liability of the City. Notwithstanding the foregoing,the City will indemnify,hold harmless,and defend(to the extent permitted by the Minnesota Attorney General)the State against any claims,causes of actions,damages,costs(including reasonable attorneys fees),and expenses arising in -6- Payable Lump Sam(Municipal Agreements) MnDOT Contract No: 04853 connection with the project covered by this Agreement,regardless of whether such claims are asserted by the City's contractor(s)or consultant(s)or by a third party because of an act or omission by the City or its contractor(s)or consultant(s). 10.2.Each party is responsible for its own employees for any claims arising under the Workers Compensation Act. 103.The City may require its contractor to carry insurance to cover claims for damages asserted against the City's contractor. 11. Nondiscrimination Provisions of Minnesota Statutes § 181.59 and of any applicable law relating to civil rights and discrimination are considered part of this Agreement. 12. State Audits Under.Minnesota Statutes § 16C.05,subdivision 5,the City's books,records,documents,and accounting procedures and practices relevant to this Agreement are subject to examination by the State and the State Auditor or Legislative Auditor,as appropriate,for a minimum of six years from the end of this Agreement. 13. Government Data Practices The City and State must comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act,Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13,as it applies to all data provided under this Agreement,and as it applies to all data created,collected,received, stored,used,maintained,or disseminated by the City under this Agreement.The civil remedies of Minnesota Statutes§13.08 apply to the release of the data referred to in this clause by either the City or the State. 14. Governing Law;Jurisdiction;Venue Minnesota law governs the validity,interpretation and enforcement of this Agreement. Venue for all legal proceedings arising out of this Agreement,or its breach,must be in the appropriate state or federal court with competent jurisdiction in Ramsey County,Minnesota. 15. Termination;Suspension 15.1. By Mutual Agreement.This Agreement may be terminated by mutual agreement of the parties or by the State for insufficient funding as described below. 15.2. Termination for Insuf kient Funding.The State may immediately terminate this Agreement if it does not obtain funding from the Minnesota Legislature,or other funding source;or if funding cannot be continued at a level sufficient to allow for the payment of the services covered here.Termination must be by written or fax notice to the City.The State is not obligated to pay for any services that are provided after notice and effective date of termination. However,the City will be entitled to payment,determined on a pro rata basis, for services satisfactorily performed to the extent that funds are available.The State will not be assessed any penalty if this Agreement is terminated because of the decision of the Minnesota Legislature,or other funding source,not to appropriate funds. 15.3. Suspension. In the event of a total or partial government shutdown,the State may suspend this Agreement and all work,activities,performance and payments authorized through this Agreement. Any work performed during a period of suspension will be considered unauthorized work and will be undertaken at the risk of non-payment. ib. Force Majeure Neither party will be responsible to the other for a failure to perform under this Agreement(or a delay in performance),if such failure or delay is due to a force majeurc event. A force majeure event is an event beyond a party's reasonable control,including but not limited to,unusually severe weather,fire,floods,other acts of God, labor disputes,acts of war or terrorism,or public health emergencies. -7- Payable Lump Sum(Municipal Agreements) MnDOT Contract No: 04853 [The remainder of this page has been intentionally left blank] Payable Lump Sum(Municipal Agreements) MnDOT Contract No: 04853 STATE ENCUMBRANCE VERIFICATION DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Individual certifies that funds have been encumbered as required by Minnesota Statutes§ 16A.15 and 160.05. Recommended for Approval: Signed: By: (District Engineer) Date: Date: SWIFT Purchase Order: 3000232656 Approved: CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY By: (State Design Engineer) The undersigned certify that they have lawfully Date: executed this contract on behalf of the Governmental Unit as required by applicable charter provisions, resolutions or ordinances. By: COMMISSIONER OF ADMINISTRATION Title: By: Date: (With delegated authority) Date: By: Title: Date: INCLUDE COPY OF RESOLUTION APPROVING THE AGREEMENT AND AUTHORIZING ITS EXECUTION. -9- Payable Lump Sum(Municipal Agreements) citvo 901d,enit4o� M E M 0 R A N D U M valley Physical Development Department 763-533-8030/763-593-3988(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting April 7, 2015 Agenda Item 3. E. 2. Award Contract for 2015 Pavement Marking Project Prepared By Jeff Oliver, City Engineer Bert Tracy, Public Works Maintenance Manager Summary Bids for the 2015 Pavement Marking project were opened on March 17, 2015. The following bids were received: Century Fence Company $22,465.40 Sir Lines—A-lot $23,261.60 Traffic Marking Service, Inc. $24,288.80 AAA Striping Service $34,464.80 Staff has reviewed the bids and found them to be accurate and in order. Funding for this project is in the Street Maintenance Division budget (2015-16 Biennial Budget Program 1440-6440, page 58). Recommended Action Motion authorizing a contract to Century Fence Company in the amount of$22,465.40 for the 2015 Pavement Marking Project, City Project No. 15-04. CHV 0 goiden MEMORANDUM valley Physical Development Department 763-593-80301763-593-3988(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting April 7, 2015 Agenda Item 3. E. 3. Award Contract for 2015 Asphalt Overlay Project, City Improvement Project No. 15-07 Prepared By Jeff Oliver, PE, City Engineer R.J. Kakach, EIT, Engineer Summary Staff solicited bids for the 2015 Asphalt Overlay Project. Proposals included a base bid for the following roadways: 1. South Wayzata Boulevard from T.H. 169 to General Mills Boulevard (Local) 2. General Mills Boulevard from South Wayzata Boulevard to 1-394 (Local) The proposals also included an alternate bid for mill and overlays of the following streets: 1. General Mills Boulevard from 1-394 to Betty Crocker Drive Funding for the 2015 Asphalt Overlay Project is included in the 2015-2019 Capital Improvement Program (S-013, page 95) in the amount of$500,000, and from Municipal State Aid Street Maintenance funding (S-017, page 96) in the amount of$125,000. Bids for the 2015 Asphalt Overlay Project, City Improvement Project No. 15-07 were opened on March 26, 2015. The following Base Bid plus Alternate Bid 1 were received: Omann Brothers Paving, Inc. $599,916.99 North Valley, Inc. $615,600.61 Midwest Asphalt Corporation $619,694.70 GMH Asphalt Corporation $624,457.50 Hardrives, Inc. $669,675.87 Northwest Asphalt, Inc. $681,249.25 Park Construction Company $743,148.60 The bids were reviewed and the apparent low bidder was under budget for the overlay of the local streets (South Wayzata Boulevard and General Mills south of 1-394) within the project. However, the total of the low bid exceeded the total funds available for the Municipal State Aid streets (General Mills from 1-394 to Betty Crocker) by$136,302.62. The State Aid roadways that are included within this project are all in high need of an overlay in order to extend the life expectancy of the pavements and protect the City's investment in these streets. It appears that a significant amount of the pavement degradation present is a result of the ongoing issues of the interaction of sealcoating and the wear course of pavement being experienced throughout the state. The State Aid roadways within the project were advanced for overlay in 2015 due to the condition of the pavements. Delay of the proposed overlays on the State Aid streets will result in advanced degradation within the following year, as additional State Aid routes and local streets also experience degradation and come into need for overlays. Based upon the condition of the State Aid street and the ongoing need for overlays on streets already constructed to City standards, staff is recommending that the base bid and bid alternate 1 be included in the 2015 Asphalt Overlay Project, and that an additional $136,302.62 be utilized from the State Aid Local Improvement Fund (Fund 5100) to finance the project. Attachments • Location Map (1 page) Recommended Action Motion to award a contract for the 2015 Asphalt Overlay Project to the lowest responsible bidder, Omann Brothers Paving, Inc., for the Base Bid and Alternate Bid 1, in the amount of $599,916.99. i General Mills Harold Ave i Nature Preserve j 201 j General Mills eft GfeeK Pond bass Betty Crocker pr i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i d 0°o Loop E Pond I 1 ! Hwy 394 I Loop F 1 Pond 1 I CP = Westwood Hills ! Nature Center(SLP) --- --- - - -----=----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Westw Lak Print Date: 12/10/2014 e 2015 Asphalt - o pyo�d n Hennepin County surveyors HOffice for O! G Property Lines(2014)&Aerial Photography(2012). 9� valley Overlay Project city of G2Valley for all other layers. 0 25050 500 1,000 Feet ci 0 «. ' valley Physical Development Department 763-533-8030/763-593-3988(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting April 7, 2015 Agenda Item 3. E. 4. Award Contract for Twin Lake Alum Treatment, City Improvement Project No. 12-27 Prepared By Jeff Oliver, PE City Engineer Summary Twin Lake, located immediately east of Sweeney Lake in the City of Golden Valley and partially within Theodore Wirth Park, has a history of excellent water quality and is likely one of the cleanest lakes in the Twin Cities metropolitan area. As such, the Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission (BCWMC) Watershed Management Plan includes a policy to protect its high water quality, in addition to improving the water quality of other water bodies in the watershed. During recent years, the phosphorus levels measured within Twin Lake spiked to high levels that have historically not been present. These measured phosphorus levels raised concerns regarding the water quality in the lake and resulted in BCWMC performing additional studies to determine the cause of the increase in nutrient levels. These studies determined that drought conditions and above average temperatures resulted in a water inversion within Twin Lake that resulted in release of phosphorus contained in the bottom sediment of the lake. Furthermore, it was determined that the high phosphorus levels were likely to reoccur should similar conditions develop in the future. Based upon these study results, the BCWMC directed its engineer to prepare a feasibility report to determine methods to control phosphorus levels in the future. This feasibility report determined that an alum treatment of Twin Lake would be effective in controlling the phosphorus contained in the lake sediment, which would minimize the threat of phosphorus release from the sediments in the future. The City retained Barr Engineering Co. to prepare plans and specifications for the water quality improvement project. Quotes were solicited from two companies for the Twin Lake Alum Treatment Project. One quote was received and opened on March 25, 2015, with the following bid submitted: HAB Aquatic Solutions $39,340.00 The BCWMC has $163,000 in its 2015 Capital Improvement Program for this project and will reimburse the City for its expenditures. Recommended Action Motion to award a contract for the Twin Lake Alum Treatment Project to the lowest responsible bidder, HAB Aquatic Solutions, in the amount of$39,340. crolden MEMORANDUM valley Physical Development Department 763-593-8030 f 763-593-3388(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting April 7, 2015 Agenda Item 3. E. 5. Purchase Dodge Charger Police Sedan Prepared By Bert Tracy, Public Works Maintenance Manager Steve Loomis, Vehicle Maintenance Foreman Summary The proposed 2015-2019 Capital Improvement Program includes $75,000 for the purchase of two marked police squad vehicles, equipment and setup (V&E-001, page 23). The first marked squad vehicle was approved at the January 20, 2015, City Council meeting. The Police Department is requesting to replace the second marked squad vehicle at this time. The Police Department vehicle scheduled for replacement meets replacement criteria set forth in the City's Vehicle Replacement Policy and Vehicle Condition Index (VCI). The VCI index is a tool utilized to assess all vehicles and equipment scheduled for replacement. Any vehicle/equipment scoring 28 points and above meets the category of"needs immediate consideration." Below is a summary of the rating: ----- -- ------------ ----- .. --- ____ ------ ----- -------------- --- ----- ----- --..........- Vehicle Year/Make/Model VCI Index 816 Marked Squad 2011 Dodge Charger Police Sedan 29 Replacement purchase of the Dodge Charger Police Sedan will be made under the State of Minnesota Squad Vehicles Contract 89303, Nelson Auto Center, Fergus Falls, MN, for 2015 Dodge Charger Police Sedan. The Minnesota Materials Management Division has awarded the following contract: _Contract No. Item Vendor Amount 89303 2015 Dodge Charger 4-door Nelson Auto Center $30,063.71 Police Sedan AWD TOTAL PURCHASE $30,063.71 Public Works staff has worked with Police staff in selection of the vehicle. The Police Chief concurs with this vehicle acquisition. Recommended Action Motion to approve purchase of one Dodge Charger Police Sedan from Nelson Auto Center for the total purchase price of$30,063.71. 1 ., at gol jlen M E M 0 R d VaIICY G N D U M Physical Development Department 763-593-8030/763-593-3988(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting April 7, 2015 Agenda Item 3. E. 6. Purchase Compact Excavator Prepared By Bert Tracy, Public Works Maintenance Manager Summary The 2015-2019 Capital Improvement Program Storm Sewer includes $60,000 for the purchase one Compact (Mini) 360 degree Rubber Track Excavator (SS-47, page 82). The Utility Division is requesting to purchase the rubber track excavator which will be utilized for easement storm sewer pipe and/or structure replacement and repair. The compact rubber track excavator is an essential piece of equipment for excavating backyards and between homes. The compact size of the excavator allows staff to excavate in small work areas with minimal damage. The compact size also makes the excavator a versatile piece of equipment for off-road use and the rubber track design minimizes impacts on turf areas when entering and exiting the excavation site. The 360-degree excavation gives more flexibility when excavating in easements versus a tractor backhoe. The Public Works Department received the following quote from Tri-State Bobcat and contract pricing from NJPA and the State of Minnesota for the purchase of one E45 T4 Bobcat Compact Excavator: 1. Tri-State Bobcat, Inc. $54,600.00 2. Minnesota State Contract #89022 Release #E-95(5) $58,448.80 3. NJPA Contract #060311-CEC Bobcat Company $59,159.00 Recommended Action Motion to approve the purchase of the E45 T4 Bobcat Compact Excavator from Tri-State Bobcat, Inc. for the total amount of$54,600. Cit 1 0 golden MEMORANDUM valley Physical Development Department 763-593-8030/763-593-3988(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting April 7, 2015 Agenda Item 3. E. 7. Purchase Two Vehicle Maintenance Hoists Prepared By Bert Tracy, Public Works Maintenance Manager Steve Loomis, Vehicle Maintenance Foreman Summary The 2015-2019 Capital Improvement Program for Buildings includes $45,000 for the purchase and installation of two vehicle maintenance hoists (B-035, page 71). The Vehicle Maintenance Division is requesting to replace two vehicle maintenance hoists that are approximately 25 years old. These hoists are utilized for lifting police vehicles, automobiles, pickup trucks, and small equipment such as Bobcat toolcats. Both existing hoists leak hydraulic fluid into the containment pit due to excess wear on the hoist system creating environmental and safety concerns. The new hoist systems will have a 10,000-pound lifting capacity and be a fully-contained vehicle and equipment hoist system operated from a pedestal control system, similar to the larger vehicle and equipment hoist purchased in 2013 and 2014. The new hoist systems will have the most current safety features to reduce the risk to staff while lifting and working under the City vehicles. The two new hoist systems will allow Vehicle Maintenance staff to safely service, repair and thoroughly inspect, police vehicles, automobiles, pickup trucks and small equipment. The hoists are on the Houston Galveston Area Council (HGAC) Cooperative Purchasing Program. The Houston-Galveston Area Council is a regional council of governments which assists state and local governments throughout the country in purchasing vehicles, equipment and services. Public Works received the following two quotes for the installation of the vehicle maintenance hoist: Lube-Tech $11,600.00 S & R Sales $12,220.00 Public Works will be utilizing Environmental Process, Inc. (EPI) for engineering services for the hoist installation. EPI $4,800.00 Below is the HGAC contract price, Lube-Tech installation quotation and total purchase amount: HGAC Contract# Item Vendor Amount SL210i-FA Smartlift with Trio HGAC Contract Vendor, $17,020.83 Superstructure and Flip Up Rotary Lift, Madison, Adaptors and Liquid Indiana Detection System Quotation Install Lube-Tech $11,600.00 Installation _ Professional Services Engineering Services EPI $4,800.00 TOTAL PURCHASE $33,420.83 Recommended Action 1. Motion to approve purchase of two Vehicle Maintenance Hoists from Rotary Lift in the amount of, including freight, $17,020.83. 2. Motion to approve installation of two vehicle maintenance hoists from Lube-Tech in the amount of$11,600. 3. Motion to approve engineering services for hoist installation from Environmental Process, Inc. in the amount of$4,800. citv of gold ' f 11 MEMORANDUM valley Physical Development Department 763-593-8095/763-593-8109(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting April 7, 2015 Agenda Item 3. F. Second Consideration - Ordinance#548 -Amending Chapter 12: Subdivision Regulations (Platting), regarding Modifications from the 2015-2015 Subdivision Study Prepared By Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager Summary Amendments to the Zoning and Subdivision Codes were developed through the Subdivision Study process in 2014 and 2015 in consultation with residents and members of the Planning Commission and City Council. On April 7, 2015, the Council approved changes to the Zoning Code and the first consideration of the ordinance amending the Subdivision Code. If Council adopts the ordinance amending the Subdivision Code on second consideration, it will be effective upon publication. Attachments Ordinance#548, Amending Chapter 12: Subdivision Regulations (Platting), regarding Modifications from the 2015-2015 Subdivision Study (2 pages) Recommended Action Motion to adopt on second consideration, Ordinance #548, Amending Chapter 12: Subdivision Regulations (Platting), regarding Modifications from the 2015-2015 Subdivision Study. ORDINANCE NO. 548, 2ND SERIES AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE Amending Chapter 12: Subdivision Regulations (Platting), Regarding Modifications from the 2014-2015 Subdivision Study The City Council for the City of Golden Valley hereby ordains as follows: Section 1. City Code Section 12.03 Definition #26 Width of Lot is amended to read as follows: 26. Width of Lot: The minimum required horizontal distance between the side lot lines measured at right angles to the lot depth, at the minimum front yard setback line. Section 2. City Code Section 12.20, Subdivision 5(A) is deleted and replaced with the following: A. Minimum Requirements. 1. All lots shall meet the minimum area requirements of the zoning district in which they are located, except that lots in the R-1 Single-Family Residential District created through subdivision after 2014 must be at least fifteen thousand (15,000) square feet if the average of the R-1 single-family lots within two hundred fifty (250) feet of the subject parcel have an average lot area of eighteen thousand (18,000) square feet or greater, excluding from the calculation the subject parcel and lots less than four thousand one (4,001) square feet. 2. All lots shall meet the minimum dimension requirements of the zoning district in which they are located, except that lots in the R-1 Single-Family Residential District created through subdivision after 2014 must meet the minimum lot width at the minimum front yard setback line and maintain that lot width to a point seventy (70) feet back from the front lot line. 3. The front of each lot shall abut entirely on an improved public street. Section 3. City Code Section 12.50, Subdivision 2(F) is added as follows and the remaining sections re-lettered accordingly: F. Size, species, and location of all existing significant trees, specimen trees, and significant woodlands, as defined by City Code, located within the project limits. These significant trees, specimen trees, and significant woodlands should be identified in both graphic and tabular form. This existing tree survey must be prepared by a certified tree inspector or landscape architect retained by the applicant. Section 4. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 12.99 entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Ordinance 548 - continued April 7, 2015 Section 5. This Ordinance shall take effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law. Adopted by the City Council this 7th day of April, 2015. /s/Shepard M. Harris Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: /s/Kristine A. Luedke Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk CI -i, t golden MEMORANDUM valley Administrative Services Department 763-593-8013/763-593-3969(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting April 7, 2015 Agenda Item 3, G. On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor License with Sunday Sales - Sushi X Prepared By Kris Luedke, City Clerk Summary ShoGun Golden Valley Inc. d/b/a Sushi X has applied for an On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor License with Sunday Sales. Sushi X is located at 6440 Wayzata Boulevard at the former Osaka Sushi location. The City Attorney has reviewed the application, and has found the application documents are in order and complete. The Golden Valley Police Department completed the background investigation and has found no reason to deny the license. Recommended Action Motion to approve the issuance of an On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor License with Sunday Sale to ShoGun Golden Valley Inc. d/b/a Sushi X, located at 6440 Wayzata Boulevard. 'tv aoiden MEMORANDUM valley Finance Department 763-593-8013/763-593-8109(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting April 7, 2015 Agenda Item 3. H. Approval of Requests for Beer and/or Wine at Brookview Park Prepared By Kris Luedke, City Clerk Summary As per City Code Section 10.83, Subd. 2 I. "No person shall possess, display, consume or use alcoholic beverages on any City park property, unless permission is granted by the Council." As part of the application process for a Facilities Use Permit to use the large and small picnic shelters at Brookview Park the applicant has the option to pay an additional $25 to be able to serve beer and/or wine. Attached is a list of the individuals and/or organizations who have requested that option. Attachments • Beer and/or wine request list (1 page) Recommended Action Motion to approve the requests for beer and/or wine at Brookview Park as recommended by staff. BEER AND/OR WINE REQUEST LIST INDIVIDUAL OR ORGANIZATION CC DATE DATE TIME SHELTER APPROVED Naftali Kokiro 06-13 5 pm - 10 pm Small 04-07-15 Scott Gannis 06-29 5 pm - 10 pm Small 04-07-15 Raymond Howard 07-11 11 am - 5 pm Small 04-07-15 Herminio Flores 07-11 5 pm - 10 pm Large 04-07-15 Ruth Schroeder 07-24 5 pm - 10 pm Large 04-07-15 Addita Tyler 07-26 5 pm - 10 pm Large 04-07-15 Sport Ngin - Emilee Rank 07-30 11 am - 5 pm Large 04-07-15 Sport Ngin - Emilee Rank 07-30 5 pm - 10 pm Large 04-07-15 Ashley Gordon 08-01 5 pm - 10 pm Small 04-07-15 Bulk Reef Supply -Anne Rasmussen 08-15 11 am - 4 pm Large 04-07-15 Jim Sherburne 08-30 11 am - 5 pm Large 04-07-15 Jim Sherburne 08-30 5 pm - 10 pm Large 04-07-15 cit'` o golden1j,,Y MEMORANDUM va Physical Development Department 763-593-8095/763-593-8109(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting April 7, 2015 Agenda Item 3. I. Approval of Extension for Submitting Final PUD Plan Application - PUD#118 - Golden Villas - 9130 and 9220 Olson Memorial Highway- Golden Villas, LLC, Applicant Prepared By Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager Summary At the September 16, 2014, City Council meeting, the Council approved the Preliminary PUD Plan for the Golden Villas PUD No. 118. The Preliminary PUD Plan provides for the construction of a 7-story, 162-unit apartment building in the Highway 55 West Redevelopment Area. Due to funding delays, Golden Villas, LLC is requesting an extension for the submittal of the Final PUD Plan. At this time, staff recommends that the extension of the PUD approval be approved. Attachments • Location Map (1 page) Recommended Action Motion to approve an extension for submittal of the Final PUD Plan application for Golden Villas PUD No. 118 until October 4, 2015. • LYMOUTH **046 •••!•• R!e !! •••• ! • 2 r I • v ' Subject Properties: 9130 and 9220 Olson Memorial Hwy T AW • � Q J iD C i Z t i i City CJ golde s MEMORANDUM V ley Park and Recreation Department 763-512-2345/763-512-2344(fax) � i Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting April 7, 2015 Agenda Item 3. J. Acceptance of Donation for Memorial Bench - Brookview Golf Course from Family of Ron Chesen Prepared By Ben Disch, Brookview Golf Operations Manager Summary As adopted in the Donation/Gift Policy, a gift of real or personal property must be accepted by the City Council by resolution and be approved by a two-thirds majority of the Council. One memorial donation has been made to the City for$700.00. The bench, to be located on the 91h tee box at Brookview Golf Course, is donated from the Family of Ron Chesen. Attachments • Resolution Accepting Donation from the Family of Ron Chesen for Brookview Golf Course Memorial Bench (1 page) Recommended Action Motion to adopt Resolution Accepting Donation from the Family of Ron Chesen for Brookview Golf Course Memorial Bench. Resolution 15-27 April 7, 2015 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION ACCEPTING DONATION FROM THE FAMILY OF RON CHESEN FOR BROOKVIEW GOLF COURSE MEMORIAL BENCH WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution 04-20 on March 16, 2004 which established a policy for the receipt of gifts, and WHEREAS, the Resolution states that a gift of real or personal property must be accepted by the City Council by resolution and be approved by a two-thirds majority of the Council. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council accepts the following donations: $700.00 for purchase and placement of bench on Brookview Golf Course from the Family of Ron Chesen Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by the City Clerk. City �. �olden M E M 0 R A New IV valley Administrative Services Department 763-593-8013/763-593-3969(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting April 7, 2015 Agenda Item 3. K. Authorizing Transfer of$100,000 from the Building Improvement Fund to the Cable Improvement Fund Prepared By Sue Virnig, Finance Director Summary In previous years, the Cable Franchise Fees were accounted for in the Building Improvement Fund. All equipment and improvements were paid for from the Building Improvement Fund. The following resolution would allow those monies to be transferred to a Cable Improvement Fund and be accounted separately from the Building Improvement Fund. In 2014, the City received $33,154.68 in cable franchise fees. Attachments • Resolution Authorizing Transfer of$100,000 from the Building Improvement Fund to Cable Improvement Fund (1 page) Recommended Action Motion to adopt Resolution Authorizing Transfer of$100,000 from the Building Improvement Fund to the Cable Improvement Fund. Resolution 15-28 April 7, 2015 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE TRANSFER OF $100,000 FROM THE BUILDING IMPROVEMENT FUND TO THE CABLE IMPROVEMENT FUND. WHEREAS, the transfer of $100,000 to the Cable Improvement Fund would cover costs for technology improvements for cable equipment and televising; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Golden Valley to authorize the transfer of $100,000 from the Building Improvement Fund to the Cable Improvement Fund. Shepard Harris, Mayor ATTEST: Kristine A Luedke, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by the City Clerk. citi, #/ f Vkgoldb--1 IV' M E M 0 R A N D U ki valley Physical Development Department 763-593-8030/763-593-3388(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting April 7, 2015 Agenda Item 3. L. Establish Temporary No Parking Zones for Humane Society Walk for Animals Prepared By Jeff Oliver, PE, City Engineer Summary On Saturday, May 2, 2015, the Golden Valley Humane Society will be hosting the annual Walk for Animals at their facility as well as along Theodore Wirth Parkway. In past years, the event has drawn 5,000 to 10,000 people and 3,000 to 5,000 animals. While the Humane Society provides free park and ride service to a number of lots around Golden Valley, some attendees for the event park in the residential area south of TH 55. The streets in this area are primarily 26 and 30 feet in width with parking generally permitted on both sides of the roadway. If vehicles are allowed to park on both sides of the street, larger public safety vehicles may not be able to safely pass between the parked cars. In order to maintain adequate public safety vehicle access, parking will be permitted on one side of the street only. The proposed parking restrictions are: 1. South TH 55 Frontage Road between Westwood Drive and Meadow Lane North; parking prohibited on both sides of the street. 2. North TH 55 Frontage Road from Dahlberg Drive to the west to the dead end. 3. Westwood Drive North between Chatelain Terrace and South TH 55 Frontage Road; parking is prohibited on both sides of the street. 4. Westwood Drive North between Chatelain Terrace and Beverly Avenue; parking prohibited on the west side of the street. 5. Burntside Drive between South TH 55 Frontage Road and Woodstock Avenue; parking prohibited on the east side of the street. 6. Burntside Drive between Woodstock Avenue and Westwood Drive North; parking prohibited on the north side of the street. 7. Woodstock Avenue between Burnside Drive and France Avenue North; parking prohibited on the north side of the street. 8. Ardmore Drive between South TH 55 Frontage Road and Glenwood Avenue; parking prohibited on the west side of the street. 9. Indiana Avenue North between South TH 55 Frontage Road and Woodstock Avenue; parking prohibited in the east side of the street. 10. Beverly Avenue between Westwood Drive North and Meadow Lane North; parking prohibited on the north side of the street. 11. Poplar Drive between the cul-de-sac and France Avenue North; parking prohibited on the north side of the street. 12. Sunnyridge Lane between Woodstock Avenue and Poplar Drive; parking prohibited on the west side of the street. 13. France Avenue North between Woodstock Avenue and Poplar Drive; parking prohibited on the east side of the street. Parking restrictions will only be in effect on Saturday, May 2, 2015, for the Humane Society's Walk for Animals. Public Works crews will put out temporary no parking signs the day before and remove them no later than the Monday after the event. The proposed parking restrictions have been reviewed by Police and Fire staff who concur with the recommendation. Attachments • Location map (1 page) • Resolution Temporarily Restricting Vehicle Parking for Walk for Animals (2 pages) Recommended Action Motion to adopt Resolution Temporarily Restricting Vehicle Parking for Walk for Animals. Animal Temporary No Parking ! ✓y '� Humane during Walk for Animals c ' Society Permanent No Parking on both sides (past resolution) adow Ln N e Rd -- alk Route Hwy 55 - - - Olson Memorial Hwy or o sr _ s 4) urn'` — oa StcC_ Ave L _ N ° ve a >, a E _ L nn Ln A J �0CY aR ri a� n ridge i r �IS no a County Rd 40 Glenwood Ave _ Print Date:3/13/2015 i! Sources: o l d end Walk for Animals Hennepin County Surveyors Office for e Property Lines(2015). gyral ey 'N o Parking' Areas City of Golden Valley for all others. F-, 0 200 400 800 Resolution 15-29 April 7, 2015 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION TEMPORARILY RESTRICTING VEHICLE PARKING FOR WALK FOR ANIMALS WHEREAS, the City Council has the power and authority, pursuant to Chapter 9.06, Subd. 2 of the City Code, to designate no parking zones and areas, and it appears that no parking zones should be temporarily created on Saturday, May 2, 2015. The following parking prohibitions will be in effect: 1. South TH 55 Frontage Road between Westwood Drive and Meadow Lane North; parking prohibited on both sides of the street 2. South TH 55 Frontage Road between Dahlberg Drive west to the dead end; 3. Westwood Drive North between Chatelain Terrace and South TH 55 Frontage Road; parking is prohibited on both sides of the street 4. Westwood Drive North between Chatelain Terrace and Beverly Avenue; parking prohibited on the west side of the street 5. Burntside Drive between South TH 55 Frontage Road and Woodstock Avenue; parking prohibited on the east side of the street 6. Burntside Drive between Woodstock Avenue and Westwood Drive North; parking prohibited on the north side of the street 7. Woodstock Avenue between Burnside Drive and France Avenue North; parking prohibited on the north side of the street 8. Ardmore Drive between South TH 55 Frontage Road and Glenwood Avenue; parking prohibited on the west side of the street 9. Indiana Avenue North between South TH 55 Frontage Road and Woodstock Avenue; parking prohibited in the east side of the street 10.Beverly Avenue between Westwood Drive North and Meadow Lane North; parking prohibited on the north side of the street 11. Poplar Drive between the cul-de-sac and France Avenue North; parking prohibited on the north side of the street 12.Sunnyridge Lane between Woodstock Avenue and Poplar Drive; parking prohibited on the west side of the street 13.France Avenue North between Woodstock Avenue and Poplar Drive; parking prohibited on the east side of the street; and WHEREAS, Humane Society's Walk for Animals will occur on Saturday, May 2, 2015, and participants may park on the residential streets in the area south of the Humane Society; and WHEREAS, maintaining access for public safety vehicles on all streets during the event is critical for the safety and security of all residents and participants. Resolution No. 15-29 - continued April 7, 2015 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council for the City of Golden Valley to temporarily restrict parking on Saturday, May 2, 2015, on one side of the street, as identified above, in the area bounded by Trunk Highway 55 on the north, France Avenue on the east, Poplar Drive on the south, and Westwood Drive North on the west. Parking will be restricted on both sides of the South TH 55 Frontage Road and a portion of Westwood Drive North. Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by the City Clerk. d N D U M gt)h Valley Physical Development Department 763-593-89951763-593-8149(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting April 7, 2015 Agenda Item 3. M. Authorization to Amend 2013 Community Development Block Grant Agreement with Hennepin County and Jewish Housing and Programming (J-HAP) Prepared By Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager Summary In early 2013, the City entered into an agreement with Hennepin County in support of the J-HAP project located at 9300 and 9310 Golden Valley Road through the Federal Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program. The agreement was amended in December of 2014 in order to extend the termination date to April of 2015. Hennepin County has asked for a second amendment to the agreement in order to extend the termination date to June 30, 2015. This would cover the additional time necessary for J-HAP to finalize the purchase of the properties for their project. No other terms in the existing agreement would change. Attachments • Resolution Authorizing Execution of Amendment to Subrecipient Agreement with Urban Hennepin County and Any Third Party Agreements for Jewish Housing And Programming (1 page) Recommended Action Motion to approve Resolution Authorizing Execution of Amendment to Subrecipient Agreement with Urban Hennepin County and Any Third Party Agreements for Jewish Housing and Programming. Resolution 15-30 April 7, 2015 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AMENDMENT TO SUBRECIPIENT AGREEMENT WITH URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY AND ANY THIRD PARTY AGREEMENTS FOR JEWISH HOUSING AND PROGRAMMING WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Golden Valley, through execution of a Joint Cooperation Agreement with Hennepin County, is cooperating in the Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant Program; and WHEREAS, the City of Golden Valley has previously approved Jewish Housing and Programming (J-HAP) for funding from the 2013 Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant Program; and WHEREAS, the termination date of the Subrecipient Agreement was April 1, 2015; and WHEREAS, J-HAP and Hennepin County have agreed to extend the termination date to June 30, 2015. BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council hereby authorizes and directs the Mayor and the City Manager to execute the Amendment to the Subrecipient Agreement and any required Third Party Agreements on behalf of the City to extend the termination date to June 30, 2015, Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by the City Clerk. tW11vo o'otde MEMORANDUM valley City Administration/Council 763-593-8003/763-593-8109(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting April 7, 2015 Agenda Item 3. N. Resolution Supporting Making Improvements to the 36-inch pipe for Water Service for the Joint Water Commission Cities Prepared By Thomas Burt, City Manager Summary On March 31, 2015, a joint meeting of the City Councils of Golden Valley, Crystal and New Hope was held at Golden Valley City Hall to discuss improvements to the 36 inch pipe. At the conclusion of a presentation by Bolton & Menk, Inc., each city council was given time to discuss whether or not it wanted to proceed with the improvements. At the meeting, the Golden Valley City Council indicated they were supportive of proceeding with the improvements to the 36 inch pipe. Attachments • Resolution Supporting Making Improvements to the 36-Inch Pipe for Water Service for the Joint Water Commission Cities (2 pages) Recommended Action Motion to adopt Resolution Supporting Making Improvements to the 36-Inch Pipe for Water Service for the Joint Water Commission Cities. Resolution 15-31 April 7, 2015 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION SUPPORTING MAKING IMPROVEMENTS TO THE 36 INCH PIPE FOR WATER SERVICE FOR THE JOINT WATER COMMISSION CITIES WHEREAS, the Joint Water Commission (JWC) is a joint powers entity authorized by Minnesota Statute 471.59 consisting of the cities of Crystal, Golden Valley, and New Hope, initiated in 1963; and, WHEREAS, based on this agreement, the three cities built their water distribution systems to be interconnected without reference to city boundaries; and, WHEREAS, the JWC has an ongoing long-term water purchase agreement with the City of Minneapolis water utility and intends to continue that relationship; and, WHEREAS, the JWC continues to have water delivered to the Crystal Reservoir by a 36 inch pipe from Minneapolis through the City of Robbinsdale; and, WHEREAS, in 2013 and 2014 breaks occurred that compromised service to the Joint Water, and, WHEREAS, the JWC has identified needs to maintain the 36 inch water main to deliver service for its customers, and, WHEREAS, at the direction of the three City Councils at the March 31, 2015 Tri-Council meeting and adopted by resolution in session separately, the 36-inch Watermain Emergency Repair Project; and, WHEREAS, the JWC will work with the City of Minneapolis, City of Robbinsdale and Hennepin County to make such improvements to the 36 inch pipe WHEREAS, at a Tri-Council meeting on March 31, 2015, a detailed report and cost estimate were presented to elected officials and staff. WHEREAS, at the direction of the three City Councils at the March 31, 2015 Tri-Council meeting and adopted by resolution in session separately, staff was directed to develop a capital improvement program to implement the 36-inch Watermain Emergency Repair Project; and to retain professional and contractor services to implement the emergency water supply; and, Resolution 15-31 - Continued April 7, 2015 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of (Golden Valley, Crystal, or New Hope), Minnesota: 1. That the report that was considered by the Tri-Council be ordered by the Joint Water Commission. Each City is responsible for their share of the cost. Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by the City Clerk. cit- l 4 sx golden valley Administrative Services Department 763-593-8013/763-593-3969 (fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting April 7, 2015 Agenda Item 3. O. Receipt of February 2015 Financial Reports Prepared By Sue Virnig, Finance Director Summary The monthly financial report provides a progress report of the following funds: General Fund Operations Conservation/Recycling Fund (Enterprise Fund) Water and Sewer Utility Fund (Enterprise Fund) Brookview Golf Course (Enterprise Fund) Motor Vehicle Licensing (Enterprise Fund) Storm Utility Fund (Enterprise Fund) Equipment Replacement Fund (Capital Projects Fund) General Fund Operations: As of February 2015, the City is using$1,356,942 of fund balance to balance the General Fund Budget. Attachments • February 2015 General Fund Financial Reports (2 pages) • February 2015 Conservation/Recycling Fund (1 page) • February 2015 Water and Sewer Utility Fund (1 page) • February 2015 Brookview Golf Course (1 page) • February 2015 Motor Vehicle Licensing (1 page) • February 2015 Storm Utility Fund (1 page) • February 2015 Equipment Replacement Fund (1 page) Recommended Action Motion to receive and file the February 2015 Financial Reports. City of Golden Valley Monthly Budget Report-General Fund Expenditures February, 2015 (unaudited) Over % 2015 February YTD (Under) Of Budget Division Budget Actual Actual Budget Expend. ool Council $330,450 35,082 54,781 ($275,669) 16.58% 003 City Manager 774,940 57,566 93,852 (681,088) 12.11% 004 Transfers Out 475,000 0 0 (475,000) 0.00% (1) 005 Admin. Services 1,726,920 78,403 131,578 (1,595,342) 7.62% 006 Legal 139,050 6,882 6,882 (132,168) 4.95% (2) 007 Risk Management 300,000 1,088 1,268 (298,732) 0.42% 011 General Gov't. Bldgs. 560,590 48,748 52,128 (508,462) 9.30% 016 Planning 303,780 18,768 34,648 (269,132) 11.41% 018 Inspections 704,575 49,029 84,877 (619,698) 12.05% 022 Police 5,568,860 365,664 679,684 (4,889,176) 12.21% 023 Fire 1,255,045 96,340 170,384 (1,084,661) 13.58% 035 Physical Dev Admin 285,180 23,049 43,815 (241,365) 15.36% 036 Engineering 759,890 48,078 62,706 (697,184) 8.25% 037 Streets 1,473,370 114,276 219,384 (1,253,986) 14.89% 065 Community Center 75,615 5,063 8,312 (67,303) 10.99% 066 Park & Rec.Admin. 698,640 48,056 84,461 (614,179) 12.09% 067 Park Maintenance 1,095,740 69,544 123,704 (972,036) 11.29% 068 Recreation Programs 374,490 21,785 41,277 (333,213) 11.02% TOTAL Expenditures $16,902,135 $1,087,421 $1,893,741 ($15,008 394) 11.20% (1)This transfer will be made in June, 2015. (2) Legal services have not been billed for January. City of Golden Valley Monthly Budget Report-General Fund Revenues February 2015 (unaudited) Percentage Of Year Completed 16.67% Over % 2015 Feb YTD (Under) of Budget Type Budget Actual Actual Budget Received Ad Valorem Taxes $13,266,155 0 0 ($13,266,155) 0.00% (1) Licenses 221,565 19,418 20,943 ($200,622) 9.45% Permits 800,000 67,099 216,627 ($583,373) 27.08% Federal Grants 0 0 1,135 $1,135 State Aid 261,600 7,500 9,919 ($251,681) 3.79% (2) Hennepin County Aid 31,205 0 0 ($31,205) (3) Charges For Services: General Government 19,065 946 6,831 ($12,234) 35.83% Public Safety 176,120 4,086 7,466 ($168,654) 4.24% Public Works 141,000 12,723 13,750 ($127,250) 9.75% Park& Rec 396,300 40,413 64,686 ($331,614) 16.32% Other Funds 841,500 55,433 112,684 ($728,816) 13.39% Fines & Forfeitures 320,425 20,539 20,539 ($299,886) 6.41% (4) Interest On Investments 100,000 0 0 ($100,000) 0.00% (5) Miscellaneous Revenue 227,200 31,256 45,553 ($181,647) 20.05% Transfers In 100,000 8,333 16,666 ($83,334) 16.67% (6) TOTAL Revenue $16,902,135 $267,746 $536,799 ($16,365,336) 3.18% Notes: (1) Payments are received in July, December, and January(delinquencies). (2) Police Training will be paid in August. Safe and Sober is billed on time spent. (3)Violent Offenders Task Force is run by Hennepin County. (4) Fines/Forfeitures are through January 2015. (5) Investment income is allocated at year end. (6)Transfers are monthly. City of Golden Valley Monthly Budget Report-Conservation/Recycling Enterprise Fund February 2015 (unaudited) Over 2015 Feb YTD (Under) % Budget Actual Actual Budget Current Revenue Hennepin County Recycling Grant 56,770 0 0 (56,770) 0.00% Recycling Charges 332,875 28,556 28,618 (304,257) 8.60% (2) Miscellaneous Revenues 3,000 0 0 (3,000) Interest on Investments 9,000 0 0 (9,000) 0.00% (1) Total Revenue 401,645 28,556 28,618 (373,027) 7.13% Expenses: Recycling 451,460 22,802 27,094 (424,366) 6.00% (3) Total Expenses 451,460 22,802 27,094 (424,366) 6.00% (1) Interest Earnings are allocated at year-end. (2)January Services are all booked to Dec 2014 for January(2/3)/February (1/3). (3) Republic Services are billed through January. City of Golden Valley Monthly Budget Report-Water and Sewer Utility Enterprise Fund February, 2015(unaudited) Over 2015 Feb YTD (Under) % Budget Actual Actual Budget Current Revenue Water Charges 4,360,500 245,426 331,984 (4,028,516) 7.61% Emergency Water Supply 183,600 9,783 19,027 (164,573) 10.36% Sewer Charges 3,276,450 270,163 355,178 (2,921,272) 10.84% Meter Sales 8,000 367 724 (7,276) 9.05% MCES Grant Program 0 2,000 19,200 19,200 Penalties 110,000 10,772 13,162 (96,838) 11.97% Charges for Other Services 90,000 3,947 7,503 (82,497) 8.34% State Water Testing Fee Pass Through 45,500 3,986 4,166 (41,334) 9.16% Sale of Assets 10,000 0 0 (10,000) 0.00% Certificate of Compliance 75,000 4,400 13,150 (61,850) 17.53% Interest Earnings 15,000 0 0 (15,000) 0.00% Total Revenue 8,174,050 550,844 764,094 (7,409,956) 9.35% Expenses: Utility Administration 2,436,590 184,337 236,632 (2,199,958) 9.71% Sewer Maintenance 2,752,485 202,182 557,063 (2,195,422) 20.24% Water Maintenance 4,571,485 217,940 912,141 (3,659,344) 19.95% Total Expenses 9,760,560 604,459 1,705,836 (8,054,724) 17.48% City of Golden Valley Monthly Budget Report- Brookview Golf Course Enterprise Fund February, 2015(unaudited)Course Opened March 13, 2015 Over 2015 February YTD (Under) % Budget Actual Actual Budget Current Revenue Green Fees 838,265 0 0 (838,265) 0.00% Driving Range Fees 105,000 53 53 (104,947) 0.05% Par 3 Fees 137,370 0 0 (137,370) 0.00% Lawn Bowling 38,000 0 0 (38,000) 0.00% Pro Shop Sales 80,000 0 0 (80,000) 0.00% Pro Shop Rentals 244,000 19 1,069 (242,931) 0.44% Concession Sales 281,000 756 2,292 (278,708) 0.82% Other Revenue 72,280 4,073 4,073 (68,207) 5.64% Interest Earnings 2,000 0 0 (2,000) 0.00% (1) Less:Credit Card Charges/Sales Tax (35,000) 0 0 35,000 0.00% Total Revenue 1,762,915 4,901 7,487 (1,755,428) 0.42% Expenses: Golf Operations 682,945 35,492 72,846 (610,099) 10.67% (2) Course Maintenance 695,665 43,970 67,758 (627,907) 9.74% Pro Shop 106,300 3,180 13,541 (92,759) 12.74% Grill 244,355 626 1,362 (242,993) 0.56% Driving Range 49,715 164 164 (49,551) 0.33% Par 3 Course 25,770 58 58 (25,712) 0.23% Lawn Bowling 20,175 0 0 (20,175) 0.00% Total Expenses 1,824,925 83,490 155,729 (1,669,196) 8.53% (1) Interest Earnings are allocated at year-end. (2) Depreciation is allocated at year-end. City of Golden Valley Monthly Budget Report- Motor Vehicle Licensing Enterprise Fund February 2015 (unaudited) Over 2015 Feb YTD (Under) % Budget Actual Actual Budget Current Revenue Interest Earnings 2,000 0 0 (2,000) 0.00% (1) Charges for Services 406,330 32,625 60,507 (345,823) 14.89% Total Revenue 408,330 32,625 60,507 (347,823) 14.82% Expenses: Motor Vehicle Licensing 408,330 29,896 53,749 (354,581) 13.16% Total Expenses 408,330 29,896 53,749 (354,581) 13.16% (1) Interest Earnings are allocated at year-end. City of Golden Valley Monthly Budget Report-Storm Utility Enterprise Fund February, 2015(unaudited) Over 2015 Feb YTD (Under) % Budget Actual Actual Budget Current Revenue Interest Earnings 45,000 0 0 (45,000) 0.00% (1) Storm Sewer Charges 2,228,920 191,732 321,220 (1,907,700) 14.41% Bassett Creek Watershed 1,453,000 34,747 34,747 (1,418,253) 2.39% Miscellaneous Receipts 0 0 0 0 State Grant-Other 0 0 0 0 Total Revenue 3,726,920 226,479 355,967 (3,370,953) 9.55% Expenses: Storm Utility 2,510,590 315,511 344,727 (2,165,863) 13.73% (2) Street Cleaning 125,535 0 0 (125,535) 0.00% Environmental Control 294,465 7,021 13,466 (280,999) 4.57% Debt Service Payments 171,220 151,441 151,441 (19,779) 88.45% Total Expenses 3,101,810 473,973 509,634 (2,592,176) 16.43% (1) Interest Earnings are allocated at year-end. (2) Depreciation is allocated at year-end and. 2015 Equipment Replacement Fund(CIP)-Fund 5700 2015 Feb YTD Budget Total Actual Remaining Revenues: Proceeds-Certificate of Indebtedness 800,000 0 0 (800,000) Sale of Assets 35,000 0 0 (35,000) Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 Interest Earnings(allocated at year end) 20,365 0 0 (20,365) Total Revenues 855,365 0 0 (855,365) Expenditures: Program# Project Number Project Name 5700 Bond Expenditures 0 0 0 0 5701 V&E-001 Marked Squad Cars(Police) 75,000 0 0 75,000 (1) 5702 V&E-002 Computers and Printers(Finance) 80,000 234 234 79,766 5703 V&E-004 Phone System(Finance) 69,500 0 0 69,500 5712 V&E-024 Unmarked Police Vehicle 34,000 0 0 34,000 5712 V&E-027 Rotary Mower(Park) 98,000 0 0 98,000 5733 V&E-050 Bobcat Toolcat 50,000 0 0 50,000 5742 V&E-082 Fire Pumper 575,000 3,204 3,204 571,796 5795 V&E-091 Pickup Truck(Park) 50,000 0 0 50,000 5800 V&E-087 Pickup Truck(Fire) 40,000 0 0 40,000 5786 V&E-083 Passenger Vehicle(Fire) 40,000 0 0 40,000 5783 V&E-127 800 Mhz Radios(Fire) 165,500 12,580 146,613 18,887 5797 V&E-129 800 Mhz Radios(Police) 162,180 0 141,136 21,044 Total Expenditures 1,439,180 16,018 291,187 1,147,993 (1)Computers are replaced every 4-5 years and purchased throughout the year based on available time. c d tv goiden"1111 MEMORANDUM valley City.Administration Council 763-593-8003/763-593-8109(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting April 7, 2015 Agenda Item 3. P. Proclamation for 2015 Earth Day Prepared By Shep Harris, Mayor Summary The City of Golden Valley's Earth Day aims to inspire awareness of and appreciation for the earth's environment. This April, over a billion people from more the 176 countries worldwide will celebrate Earth Day. Founded in 1970 by U.S. Senator Gaylord Nelson, Earth Day was first organized to promote ecology and respect for life on the planet as well as to encourage awareness of the growing problems of air, water, and soil pollution. Attachments • Proclamation for Earth Day-April 2015 (1 page) Recommended Action Motion to adopt Proclamation designating April 22, 2015, as Earth Day in the City of Golden Valley. CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY MINNESOTA PROCLAMATION FOR EARTH DAY APRIL 2015 WHEREAS, the global community now faces extraordinary challenges, such as global health issues, food and water shortages, and economic struggles; and WHEREAS, all people, regardless of race, gender, income, or geography, have a moral right to a healthy, sustainable environment with economic growth; and WHEREAS, it is understood that the citizens of the global community must step forward and take action to create a green economy to combat the aforementioned global challenges; and WHEREAS, a green economy can be achieved on the individual level through educational efforts, public policy, and consumer activism campaigns; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to broaden and diversify this global movement to achieve maximum success; and BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Golden Valley hereby encourages its residents, businesses and institutions to use EARTH DAY to celebrate the Earth and commit to building a sustainable and green economy; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the City of Golden Valley, hereby pledges this Earth Day, April 22, 2015, to support green economy initiatives in Golden Valley and to encourage others to undertake similar actions. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the great seal of the City of Golden Valley to be affixed this 7th day of April 2015. Shepard M. Harris, Mayor 000.0 oiuoiuou 101111 ,, moiIv' 0 4111111 15'1r. 11111 me 111111110 11 loo III I0ot 1 11111 1(4 Physical Development Department 763-593-8095/763-593-8109(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting April 7, 2015 60 day deadline: April 5, 2015 60 day extension:June 4, 2015 Agenda Item 4. A. Public Hearing - Final PUD Plan Central Park West PUD No. 121 - 1400 and 1500 State Highway 100 South, 5075 Wayzata Boulevard, 1511 Utica Avenue South - DLC Residential, LLC, Applicant Prepared By Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager Emily Goellner, Associate Planner/Grant Writer Summary DLC Residential, LLC, is seeking approval of a Final Planned Unit Development (PUD) Permit to develop several buildings and a parking ramp at the southwest quadrant of 1-394 and Highway 100. This PUD proposal is unique in that it is located in both Golden Valley and St. Louis Park. In order to promote high quality site planning, staff at both cities have analyzed the same site plan set simultaneously. The Final PUD application was approved with conditions at the St. Louis Park Planning Commission meeting on March 4 and the Golden Valley Planning Commission on March 9. The public hearing with St. Louis Park City Council is scheduled for April 6. This PUD would contain two 6-story multi-family residential buildings, one 6-story limited service hotel, a 7-story parking ramp, two 11-story office buildings, and a park. In the Final PUD plans, the applicant provided final construction plans for the residential buildings and park on Lot 1 and Lot 2. Once the applicant has prepared final construction plans for Lot 3 and Outlot A, the applicant would be required to apply for an amendment to the PUD in both cities. Outlot A would be platted at that time. Currently, the site is primarily covered by impervious surface. The property is zoned for Business and Professional Offices in Golden Valley and it is guided for long- term office use on the General Land Use Plan map. The total area of site is 13.48 acres with 6 acres in Golden Valley. Comparison to Preliminary PUD Plan The placement and size of the buildings in the Final PUD plan have not changed since Preliminary PUD approval. In the Final PUD plan, the applicant has responded to several conditions of preliminary approval. Bicycle counts and locations were added to the plans to show that 230 spaces will be provided in Residential Phase 1, 188 spaces for Residential Phase 2, and 265 spaces will be provided for the offices on Outlot A. The Lighting Plan was submitted and it meets the City's Outdoor Lighting requirements. Continuous sidewalk connections between the hotel and parking ramp as well as around the north and east sides of Residential Phase 1 were added to the final plans. The Final plan submittal also includes a snow storage and construction phasing plan. The design of Linear Park and its relation to the parking ramp were also refined for the final plans. The hotel on Lot 3 requires 225 parking spaces. During preliminary review, staff expressed concern that the 93 proposed spaces were not adequate. To meet the parking ratio for the hotel, additional underground spaces have been included and 140 shared parking spaces have been provided in the parking ramp. Since the majority of parking ramp users will be utilizing the ramp during business hours and the majority of hotel users will utilize the ramp during evening hours, staff is comfortable with this shared parking scenario. Hotel parking is also provided on the surface lot and underground on Lot 3. Staff will review parking for Lot 3 and Outlot A again when a PUD amendment application is submitted and there is more detail about the specific users of these buildings. At previous hearings, residents to the east of this site expressed concern that this development will increase congestion along Wayzata Boulevard and exacerbate a challenging traffic situation. As a condition of preliminary approval, City Council required that an updated traffic study be performed and an additional neighborhood meeting be hosted by the applicant. The AUAR update was completed by a licensed Professional Traffic Operations Engineer(PTOE) at Kimley-Horn on January 19, 2015, and reviewed by the City's consulting Traffic Engineer at SEH. It included updated traffic counts in the area as well as photos of sight lines along Wayzata Boulevard. It also summarized speed data along Wayzata Boulevard. The analysis was reviewed by the City's Traffic Engineer and he found the methodology of the study acceptable. A neighborhood meeting was hosted by the Developer on January 28, 2015, to discuss the results with nearby residents. Traffic Impacts In 2007, the City of St. Louis Park prepared an Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) for the new development proposed at the time. The purpose of an AUAR is to determine potential impacts from the development to adjacent facilities and to evaluate potential environmental impacts. The AUAR included a traffic analysis of a proposed PUD development called The Towers at West End. The Towers at West End PUD proposal included 1,110,220 square feet of office space spread among four 9-story towers. It also included a park and a 1,360,336 square-foot parking ramp. As part of The Towers at West End PUD proposal, the City of Golden Valley's consulting Professional Traffic Engineer, Mike Kotila of SEH, Inc., reviewed the AUAR in 2009 for potential traffic impacts in Golden Valley. One of the recommendations at that time was to modify the intersection of Wayzata Boulevard and Quentin Avenue on the east side of Highway 100 by making it an all-way stop condition and providing additional turn lanes to better accommodate the increased traffic and vehicle stacking in the area. Due to market conditions, the applicant for The Towers at West End PUD never applied for final approval. The Central Park West proposal reduces the office uses by 403,514 square feet and reduces the parking ramp by 640,085 square feet and replaces them with 2 apartment buildings (363 units) and a hotel (up to 150 rooms). A comparison of the two site plans is included in the attachments to this memorandum. Because of the replacement of office towers with apartments and a hotel, the projection for total traffic at the afternoon rush hour(referred to as the PM peak in the analysis) was reduced from 3,050 to 2,536 trips per hour (includes trips entering and exiting the site). Even with this reduction in projected PM rush hour traffic from the 2009 AUAR, there will still be an increase in traffic along Wayzata Boulevard from this development that will cause the level of service at the intersection of Wayzata Boulevard and Quentin Avenue to fall below the acceptable level of service. The City of Golden Valley's consulting Traffic Engineer, reviewed the updated AUAR Analysis completed in January, 2015 and determined that improvements to the intersection of Wayzata Boulevard and Quentin Avenue would be required at a cost to the Developer. Wayzata Boulevard/Quentin Avenue Intersection Improvements As a result of this study, the applicant will be required to fund improvements to the intersection of Wayzata Boulevard and Quentin Avenue. The intersection improvements will be constructed by the City with an estimated total project cost of$250,000. Therefore, the Applicant is required to provide a cash deposit with the City in this amount. Wayzata Boulevard Improvements Due to the nature of the existing traffic concerns on Wayzata Boulevard east of Highway 100, staff will begin the process of proposing future projects for consideration in the City's Capital Improvement Program (CIP) process. The City's Traffic Safety Committee has discussed options for further study and City staff has begun discussions with Hennepin County, City of Minneapolis, and City of St. Louis Park on potential bicycle connections in this area. Staff will also begin looking for other potential funding sources to finance the construction of traffic calming, sight line, and pedestrian and bicycle improvements along Wayzata Boulevard. Joint Powers Agreement It was initially though by Staff that a Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) would be necessary to address issues that arise with a shared PUD site. After discussions between Staff and the City Attorney, it has been determined that a JPA will not be the appropriate mechanism to carry out the goals of the City for this project. The City cannot abdicate its authority to enforce its ordinances to another agency or entity with this type of contact. The issues, such as permitting or inspections for the structures that lie across the City boundary, can be addressed through service contracts instead. Each circumstance would require a unique contract that outlines the services provided and the revenues received. In the absence of a JPA or any service contracts, services and fees would be executed on either side of the municipal boundary as they are today. As is being done with the initial approval, future changes or modifications to the PUD would require approval by both Golden Valley and St. Louis Park. Taxes The Hennepin County Assessor has confirmed the process for calculating taxes on Lot 1, which is located in both municipalities. The taxable market value will be calculated by the Assessor. The total will be divided based on the proportion of area located within each city. The Assessor assured staff that this is common practice throughout the metropolitan region. School Districts The School District boundary runs along the municipal boundary in this PUD, so residents of Golden Valley will attend schools the Hopkins School District and St. Louis Park residents will attend schools in the St. Louis Park school district. Golden Valley students are included in the Meadowbrook Elementary School sub-district. Busses from both School Districts currently serve students very close to this area. Voting The 6-story residential building on Lot 1 includes 80 units in Golden Valley and 119 units in St. Louis Park. Residents of this building will vote in the City in which their unit is located. Voters living in Golden Valley will be assigned to Precinct 3c. Voters in this precinct currently vote at Meadowbrook Elementary School. They will vote for Municipal elected positions as well as Hennepin County Commissioner in District 2; whereas, residents of St. Louis Park will vote for St. Louis Park Municipal elected positions and Hennepin County Commission in District 3. Anticipated Timeline An overall phasing plan is provided on plat sheet PH-0 of the plan submittal. Utica Avenue will be constructed in the first phase of development, which will begin in spring 2015 if final approval is granted by both cities. Phase 1 residential and the park (both located on Lot 1) will also be completed in the first phase, which is scheduled for completion in fall of 2016. The second phase will include the second residential building on Lot 2 at the corner of Wayzata Boulevard and Utica Avenue, which will occur from spring 2016 to fall 2017. The hotel will be constructed in the third phase of development, which will require an amendment to the PUD since final construction plans have not been provided in this PUD application submittal. In this phase, detailed building elevations and parking will be further examined. The exact timing of the hotel and office development may vary based on market conditions. The office is expected to be developed in the fourth and fifth phases, which would occur between spring 2016 and fall 2020. Since the proposed offices and parking ramp are located on an outlot, a Final Plat will be required before building permits are issued. Final construction plans with building elevations were not provided for Outlot A in this PUD submittal, so a PUD amendment application will be required for the offices and parking ramp so that the City can review those documents prior to construction. The remaining Traffic Management Administration Fees must also be paid to the City during future phases of approval and construction. City Code establishes standards for PUDs, which are laid out in the Staff report to the Planning Commission. In addition, City Code establishes findings that must be made by the City when creating a PUD. The Council makes the following findings pursuant to City Code Section 11.55, Subd. 6(Q): 1. Quality Site Planning. The PUD plan is tailored to the specific characteristics of the site, such as the proximity to highway traffic and a high retaining wall to the north and east and high- density development to the south and west. With flexibility under a PUD in uses allowed, setbacks, height, parking requirements, number of buildings on a lot, and similar requirements, the quality of site planning and design is of higher quality than if each parcel was designed individually under conventional provisions. By allowing a mix of land uses, the site plan offers the opportunity to live, work, visit, and enjoy outdoor gathering space. The PUD encourages creativity and flexibility in land development. 2. Preservation. The PUD plan preserves and protects substantial desirable portions of the site's characteristics, open space and sensitive environmental features including steep slopes, trees, scenic views, creeks, wetlands, and open waters. The site is currently used for surface parking and is mostly impervious. Even though 36 existing trees will be removed, the proposed plan adds over 30,000 square feet of public gathering space, over 200 tree plantings, and over 15,000 square feet of shrubs and perennial beds to the site. 3. Efficient& Effective. The PUD plan includes efficient and effective use of the land. The PUD plan provides an appropriate area of the city for high-density office, residential, and hotel uses. The PUD plan encourages development that is sustainable and has a high degree of energy efficiency. 4. Compatibility. The PUD Plan results in development compatible with adjacent uses and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and redevelopment plans and goals. High-density office, commercial, and residential uses surround the site to the south and west. Low-density residential uses are separated from this proposed PUD site by significant highway development. The PUD plan increases housing options,jobs, lodging options, and gathering space to the area. 5. General Health.The PUD plan is consistent with preserving and improving the general health, safety and general welfare of the people of the City. By encouraging the use of contemporary land planning principles, the PUD plan offers the ability to live, work, shop, and spend time outdoors without reliability on the automobile. The PUD plan promotes pedestrian activity and provides high-quality landscaping additions to the site. 6. Meets Requirements. The PUD plan meets the PUD Intent and Purpose provision and all other PUD ordinance provisions. The PUD provision permits flexibility from other provisions in Chapter 11 of the City Code. This flexibility is permitted in order to promote the intent and purpose of the PUD section of the City Code. Staff recommends approval of the Final PUD Plan subject to the following conditions: 1. Conformance to, and inclusion of, all provisions of the Final PUD Plans for Central Park West submitted with the application on February 4, 2015, with revisions submitted on March 20, 2015. 2. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Golden Valley Engineering Division to the Planning Manager, dated March 27, 2015, shall become a part of this approval. 3. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Golden Valley Fire Department to the Planning Manager, dated March 25, 2015, shall become a part of this approval. 4. All signage within the City of Golden Valley must meet the requirements of the Golden Valley City Sign Code. 5. The Final Plat name shall include "P.U.D. No. 121" in its title in accordance with City Code. 6. A park dedication fee of$70,568 (2% of the estimated land value) shall be paid prior to the City's signing and release of the Final Plat and the issuance of any building permits. 7. The Applicant shall submit the remaining 50% ($4,327.90) of the Traffic Demand Management Fee for Lot 1 with the submittal of a building permit application. The Applicant shall pay the Traffic Management Administration Fees associated with each phase of construction, as outlined in the City's I-394 Overlay Zoning District. The applicant or any future property owner shall adhere to the Travel Demand Management Plan submitted to the City on March 20, 2015. 8. The Applicant shall dedicate easements for public use of certain sidewalks and trails located within the City of Golden Valley, both inside and outside the Linear Park, in a form acceptable to the City Attorney. 9. Because the current Final PUD Plan includes only construction plans for Lot 1 and Lot 2 and concept plans for Lot 3 and Outlot A, the Applicant or future property owner must submit an application for a PUD amendment, and receive approval therefor, when more detailed plans for Lot 3 and Outlot A are prepared, prior to issuance of any building permits for Lot 3 or Outlot A. 10. The City of St. Louis Park approves that portion of the final planned unit development within its jurisdiction. 11. The Applicant and all development within the PUD shall comply with all other Golden Valley, state, federal, and local ordinances, regulations, or laws with authority over this development. 12. The Applicant shall enter into a Development Agreement with the City in conformance with City Code and in a form acceptable to the City Attorney. 13. The Applicant shall pay all required fees and costs incurred by the City related to the review and processing of the Application, including legal and professional consulting costs. Attachments • Location Map (1 page) • Planning Commission Minutes dated March 9, 2015 (11 pages) • Memo to the Planning Commission dated March 9, 2015 (11 pages) • Memo from the Engineering Division dated March 27, 2015 (9 pages) • Memo from the Fire Department dated March 25, 2015 (2 pages) • Travel Demand Management Plan dated March 20, 2015 (9 pages) • AUAR Update dated February 9, 2015 (58 pages) • Email from Jeannie Hughes dated March 30, 2015 (1 page) • Site Plans dated February 4, 2015, with revisions submitted on March 20, 2015 (107 pages) • Ordinance#550, (4 pages) Recommended Action Motion to adopt Ordinance #550, Approval of Final PUD Plan, Central Park West PUD No. 121, DLC Residential, LLC, Applicant. 1 .�p�qt �y� ➢ t�� -� l ti a v G�rcEe Uowti :. 2 N - y 04 Subject Properties - �-- � a �O r --•--�' j � .�....ti..•n......�/.M.�.,Uauylas Ave.�..�.....�..G» i Regular Meeting of the Golden Valley Planning Commission March 9, 2015 regular meeting of the Planning Com ission was held at the Golden Valley City Hall, C%pncil Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley oad, Golden Valley, Minnesota, on Monday, Mar 9, 2015, Chair Kluchka called the meeting to order at 7 pm. r Those pres�andldhauser. Planning Commis ners Baker, Blum, Cera, J on, Kluchka, Segelbaum, Also prey nt was Planning Mara =` Jason Zimmerman, Associate Planner/Gr�YVrite,!rj Emily C ellner, Physicaj�Qe�ielopment Director Marc Nevinski, City Enginever, and dministrat� ssistant Lisa Wittman. 1. Approval of Minutes �\~ February 23, 2015, Regu Ian E ing mission Meeting Waldhauser referred t, e sixth paragra h on page fi . garding the notification process for the Su division Study and a ked if it was accu a to state that each homeowner re� 'ved a post card. Zimme man stated that eve omeowner was sent a post card irk Y ctober notifying them of th'_ Subdivision Study. ;MZD by Waldhauser, seconded by gelbaum and motion carried unanimously to mmend approval of the February 2 2015, minutes as submitted. 2. Informal Public Hearing — Final PUD Plan — Central Park West— Southwest Quadrant of 1-394 and Highway 100 — PU-121 Applicant: DLC Residential, LLC Address: Southwest Quadrant of 1-394 and Highway 100 Purpose: To allow two six-story multiple family residential buildings, a six-story hotel, two 11-story office buildings, a parking ramp and a linear park in both St. Louis Park and Golden Valley. Goellner referred to a site plan and explained the applicant's plan to construct two 6- story residential buildings, two 11-story office buildings, one 6-story hotel, one 7-story parking ramp, and a privately owned and maintained public park. She stated that the development will begin this year with the residential phase 1 building, the park and the reconstruction of Utica Ave. as shown on the plans. She added that the placement of the buildings hasn't changed from what was proposed during the Preliminary Plan review, however there is slightly more parking proposed. Goellner stated that as part of the Preliminary Plan approval the Planning Commission and City Council required an updated traffic study, an additional neighborhood meeting and an expanded area for mailing hearing notices. All of which have been addressed. Goellner discussed some of the concerns that have been expressed from residents east Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission March 9, 2015 Page 2 of Highway 100 including difficulties getting onto Wayzata Blvd., traffic speed, blind corners, icy streets, and dangerous conditions for pedestrians. She added that residents would like to see improvements such as a stoplight or additional stop signs, dedicated turn lanes, and clearly marked crosswalks at the intersection of Quentin Ave. and Wayzata Blvd. Goellner stated that an updated traffic study was completed on January 19, 2015. The findings in that study showed that 15% of the traffic generated from Central Park West is projected to utilize Wayzata Boulevard east of Highway 100. Due to this increased traffic, the intersection of Quentin & Wayzata will fall to Level of Service E (not acceptable); therefore, the developer will be responsible for improvements that bring it back to Level of Service C. She stated that the developer will be required to make turn lane improvements, an all-way stop, and pedestrian/bike path improvements at this intersection. She added that traffic calming along Wayzata Boulevard could be incorporated into the City's Capital Improvement Program and that the City will work with Hennepin County on implementation. Zimmerman discussed the proposed parking for the site. He stated that the proposal is lacking 323 parking spaces, 3,598 parking spaces are required and 3,275 spaces are proposed. He referred to the bicycle parking requirements and explained that Golden Valley requires 5% of the parking required for vehicles and St. Louis Park requires 10% of the parking required for vehicles. The applicant is proposing 35% of the required car parking for the residential phase 1 building and 42% of the required car parking for the residential phase 2 building. Zimmerman stated that staff initially thought that a Joint Powers Agreement would be necessary to address some of the issues between Golden Valley and St. Louis Park. However, it has been determined that the Joint Powers Agreement isn't the appropriate mechanism, and that a service contract for inspections, etc. would be more appropriate. Zimmerman referred to a site plan and discussed access, circulation, and pedestrian connections within the site. Johnson asked how the items in the Fire Chief's staff report will be addressed. Zimmerman stated that the Fire Chief's memo will become a condition of approval. Baker noted that the supplemental parking for the hotel is located in the proposed parking ramp. He asked how long of walk that would be for hotel guests and if that is a practical place for them access the parking. Zimmerman said there have been discussions about the hotel offering valet parking or potentially using the office parking ramp. He added that as the hotel is closer to being built the details will be worked out. Baker stated that the parking is 10% short of the City's requirement and asked if that is common. Zimmerman said allowances are made especially when there are different uses and hours of operation within the businesses in a PUD. He added that there are a lot of the pedestrian options with this site as well which allows for some flexibility. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission March 9, 2015 Page 3 Blum asked about a snow removal plan. Goellner stated that the plan is for on-site snow storage until the site is completely built out, at that time snow will be removed from the site as needed. Baker asked if the recommended changes were made to the appearance of the parking ramp for the residents to the east. Goellner said yes, and referred to the renderings in the plans. Kluchka asked if the applicant is held to designs shown on their plans. Goellner said that is her understanding. Segelbaum referred to the City Engineer Jeff Oliver's staff report and read the part where it states that the traffic study concludes that the increase in traffic resulting from the current PUD proposal does not create any new, or unduly add to, the existing traffic on Wayzata Blvd. Therefore, staff is not recommending that this developer be responsible for additional improvements on Wayzata Blvd. Segelbaum asked staff to show on the site plans which part of Wayzata Blvd. the City Engineer is referring to. Zimmerman pointed out the area along Wayzata Blvd. where there is potential in the future to do some traffic calming and improvements. Oliver stated that there are existing issues on Wayzata Blvd. that the City is already aware of. He explained that the increase in traffic from this development does not result in the significant degradation of the capacity of the roadway, and the improvements needed on Wayzata Blvd. can't be linked to this development. However, the proposed development will directly affect the intersection of Quentin and Wayzata and the developer will be required to fund those improvements. Baker said he understands that the capacity doesn't suggest mitigation, but questioned when the issues the neighbors have raised such as safety, speed, and visibility will need mitigation. Oliver said these issues have been present since 1-394 was built. He added that Staff will begin looking for other potential funding sources to finance the construction of traffic calming, sight line, and pedestrian and bicycle improvements along Wayzata Blvd. and that the issues need to be addressed as opportunities present themselves. Baker asked how the disproportionate benefit of taxes will be addressed since a Joint Powers Agreement is no longer being considered. Physical Development Director Marc Nevinski stated that the Joint Powers Agreement was considering issues such as inspections, police, fire, etc., but not taxes. The Cities will tax separately based on the rates and values. Everything located Golden Valley will be taxed in Golden Valley. Kluchka asked how people would vote with the building straddling the municipal boundary. Nevinski said that people who live on the east side of the boundary will have the obligation to vote in Golden Valley. Baker asked about the other benefits such as traffic improvements and TIF money. Nevinski said Golden Valley doesn't have a TIF district in this location. Baker asked if there is a way for Golden Valley to benefit from St. Louis Park's TIF. Nevinski said no. Blum questioned how the responsibility would be split with the hotel when the hotel building is in St. Louis Park, but the hotel parking lot is in Golden Valley. Nevinski said the two Cities will enter into a service contract for these types of issues. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission March 9, 2015 Page 4 Kluchka asked if the Planning Commission will review the Wayzata/Quentin intersection plans. Zimmerman said the plans won't come to the Planning Commission for review, but the City Council will review them. Waldhauser asked about improvements to the intersections and ramps on 1-394. Zimmerman stated that most of those improvements were done during the first phase of the West End development. Johnson noted that the overflow parking for the hotel is planned to be in the office parking ramp. He questioned how that would work if the hotel is built before the office parking ramp. Zimmerman suggested surface parking could be used until the office ramp is built. Blum referred to the proposed trails in the park area and said he is concerned about accidents occurring because the trails crisscross multiple times. David Graham, ESG Architects, reviewed the overall design vision for the project. He said they've worked hard to reduce the amount of office space from 1.1 million square feet to approximately 700,000, and to reduce the amount of trips and the size of the parking ramp. He said he thinks a key part of this project are the public realm amenities including the central park, public art, streetscape amenities, and a water feature. He stated that Utica Avenue will be completely rebuilt with a class A landscaping and urban design plan, and that this project is a model for sustainable growth in a first ring suburb. He showed a rendering of the site and explained the pedestrian and bike connections. He referred to the life cycle housing in this proposal and stated that 3% of the units will be affordable. He showed a rendering of the park area and discussed the landscaping, seating, climbing walls, and the water feature. He added that the park includes high quality pavement intended more for pedestrians and passive biking, it is not intended to be a bike trail. He showed a rendering of the proposed woonerf and explained that it will be a connection to Utica Avenue for automobiles and pedestrians and will include high quality pavement and raised tree planters. He showed renderings of the proposed parking ramp and residential buildings and discussed the materials that will be used in their construction. He added that there will be 80 residential units in Golden Valley. Kluchka asked if the park designs being shown are really what is being proposed. Graham said yes. Kluchka stated that the sidewalks don't seem to connect to where the crosswalks will be on Utica Avenue. Graham said that was done intentionally to cross Utica and then move along the sidewalk on Utica and create an entry monument at that point. Kluchka said that design won't work with bikes, and pedestrians will walk over the grass. He added that the sidewalks don't connect with the human use. Graham said he would continue to work with staff on the details. Waldhauser said she is pleased to see shade trees in the plans, but she didn't see any structured soil boxes to support the trees. Graham stated that there will be raised planters with sitting benches in the woonerf area. He said he would provide more details about the planting of the trees. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission March 9, 2015 Page 5 Segelbaum asked for clarification of the traffic flow to the different structures. Luke Payne, Kimley Horn, said the entire development is designed to be served off Utica Avenue. The hotel will have an entrance on Wayzata Blvd. He referred to site plan and discussed the access drives and traffic patterns. Segelbaum asked if there will be other access points to the parking structure. Payne said there is a connection at the south end of the parking ramp and at the northeast end of the ramp, but the bulk of the trips are anticipated to come off of Utica. Kluchka asked if the intersection of Utica Avenue and 16th will be a controlled intersection. Payne said there is stop control on 16tH Waldhauser referred to the affordable units and asked if the 3% mentioned was for the phase 1 construction or all of the residential constructions. Graham said 3% is for all of the residential. Waldhauser said she thinks the numbers referenced in the staff report are incorrect because the monthly rent range seems wrong. Nevinski clarified that 3% of these units will be affordable to people making 60% of the area median income. Johnson referred to the trash hauling being limited to one vendor. He asked the applicant if they are contractually obligated to one hauler and how enforcement of that would work. Graham said the intent is to have one trash hauler and that is a fundamental management issue to see that trash hauling works properly. Kluchka opened the public hearing. Todd Shipman, 1510 Fairlawn Way, said his main concern is the traffic going east of Highway 100. He said in his view the previous PUD and this PUD are really irrelevant to the impact it will have on his life which is just getting access to his home and getting on and off Wayzata Blvd. He said the sight lines are difficult already and he hasn't heard any talk about the topography. He said on Wayzata Blvd. there is a curve, a hill, and a ramp across 1-394 that connects to a bicycle path in North Tyrol. He said he commonly comes across bicyclists in the dark, and the sun doesn't shine down onto the pavement during the winter so the curve is icy. He said it is important to the people in his neighborhood who pay taxes not to be forgotten by Golden Valley because they value their unique neighborhood. He said they also have restricted access to their neighborhood and City services could be at risk. He said there were two snow events this winter that significantly impacted Wayzata Blvd. and backed traffic up all the way to Theodore Wirth Parkway because everyone avoids 1-394. He said he can't imagine, as nice as Utica Ave. will be, that people won't go down Wayzata Blvd. to get onto 1-394 at night. He said it is a false assumption to base the issues only on traffic counts and the City is really doing a disservice to the neighbors. He said they could secede to Minneapolis or St. Louis Park and take their tax revenue with them. He added that it is really a tough scenario especially impacted by weather and any additional traffic will significantly impact them. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission March 9, 2015 Page 6 David Sussman, 1445 Fairlawn Way, said he understands the capacity of road, but questioned the capacity of the road at rush hour. He said today at 5:15 it took him almost two minutes before he could turn left onto Wayzata Blvd. because the traffic just kept coming. He said it's been growing since the West End development was built it is going to be really hard to cross that street unless something is done about the traffic. Otis Godfrey, 4630 Douglas Avenue, said he pays taxes in Golden Valley and he likes to live in Golden Valley. He referred to the proposed 3,500 parking spots and the site plan showing two exits from the parking ramp onto Wayzata Blvd. and questioned how the applicant can say all the cars will go out onto Utica Ave. He said traffic is like water and if it gets backed up in one place it will flow to other places. He said it is not reasonable to expect that everyone will go in and out on Utica Ave. He said the neighborhood east of Highway 100 is a beautiful, quiet neighborhood. It is important to have this balance and they don't need more traffic going into this area. He said when he thinks of traffic calming he is not just concerned about Wayzata Blvd. he is concerned about traffic flowing into the neighborhood as well. He said if people get frustrated enough they will find ways into their neighborhood. He said the City has known about the traffic problems for approximately 20 years, and now the traffic is being expanded by 25% and we're saying that it can compete in the next CIP against other projects. He questioned how this won't be an impact to the neighborhood and said people will be flowing into this neighborhood that shouldn't be. He urged the City to think about it and not just treat it as a problem to be handled later. Daon Karpan, 1400 Natchez Avenue South, said she is concerned about the traffic. She said in the last traffic study there was more of a promise to put an all-way stop and a turn lane in at the Quentin/Wayzata intersection. She said she is disappointed to not see that in these final plans. She said she doesn't trust the traffic study because from what she understands it is using the numbers regarding speed from 2007 and a lot has changed since then. She said the traffic volume was considered when there was a lot of snow and she believes traffic was down considerably so she is not trusting that the numbers in the study are an accurate reflection of what she experiences day to day. She referred to the expectation that people won't use Wayzata Blvd. as access, and that they will naturally tend to go to Utica. She said she wants to see more proof that will substantiate that and she wants a traffic study done reflecting today's conditions because the numbers don't add up. Segelbaum referred to Karpan's comment about improvements to the Quentin/Wayzata intersection and stated that while there aren't plans showing specific improvements, there is a large amount of money budgeted to do improvements to that intersection. Kluchka agreed and noted that there is a condition to execute a design for improvements at that intersection. Oliver explained that there will be a public improvement project funded by the developer. The intersection will be modified to have eastbound dual right turn lanes, a south bound right turn, and all-way stop for pedestrian crossings. Jason Johnson, 1550 Natchez Avenue South, said he is excited about this development but traffic must be addressed. He said he knows for a fact people won't follow Utica Ave. He asked if there are other ways to make sure people who don't live in the area won't Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission March 9, 2015 Page 7 use Wayzata Blvd. such as signs that say residents only during certain times. He said traffic is going to be a problem whether studies say so or not, and that intuition rules in this case. He added that the traffic will choke off this neighborhood from the rest of Golden Valley. Robert Lazear, 1519 Natchez Avenue South, said there is a blind curve at Natchez and Wayzata with almost no margin of error to pull out onto Wayzata. He said this isn't theoretical and it is absolutely essential that this be addressed now. He said the traffic study was done and he appreciates that, but he also knows when one side hires the expert and pays them, that it's not a completely independent study. He said the methodology is interesting because the study only looked at the am traffic and the traffic in the afternoon is at least as bad. He said he knows that as part of this project they are adding approximately 3,200 to 3,600 parking spaces to the density in the West End. He said as the parking ramp is designed now, there will be two exits dumping on Wayzata Blvd. and 2,536 two-way peak trips. He said the issue isn't whether there is capacity spread over 24 hours, it is about two hours in the morning and two hours in the afternoon. He noted that speed limit is 35 miles per hour but the traffic study showed that people travel 39 miles per hour which doesn't give them a lot of time to pull out onto Wayzata. He said it's shocking that back in 2007 neighbors said there needed to be traffic calming, an all-way stop, and curb extensions and none of those things have been done. The density has been added from the first round of development and more density is about to be added with this proposal. He questioned if the Quentin/Wayzata intersection improvements are a part of this PUD. The Commission said yes. He asked that a traffic study be done a year after the development is complete to see if the traffic control at that intersection is working. He said he also wants a condition added that there be no exits allowed onto Wayzata Blvd. He said the reality is people will leave the West End area and sneak through their neighborhood. Peter Zakrajsheck, 1425 Natchez Avenue South, said he likes the project, but the one concern is traffic. He said no one is listening to the neighbors or giving them the time of day and they are being told it will be considered in the next CIP. He said Natchez is the only street that goes through to Cedar Ave. and people will cut through. He suggested a do not enter sign be placed on the north end of the street similar to what is on the south end. He wants something done about the traffic to make the area safe. Ann Godfrey, no address given, said at her corner there are seven school buses that drop off and pick up children. She said the traffic comes really fast and the stop signs aren't observed so she's learned not to walk when schools in the area are getting out. She said she is concerned for the kids in the neighborhood especially with more traffic. Seeing and hearing no one else wishing to comment, Kluchka closed the public hearing. Kluchka said he is hearing that Wayzata Blvd. isn't a great design and hasn't been for a long time. He asked what the City can do to make improvements. Segelbaum asked if the City has control of Wayzata Blvd. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission March 9, 2015 Page 8 Oliver explained that until recently Wayzata Blvd. was owned by MnDOT but it is now a City street. He stated that staff has been listening to the neighbors and will be putting together a plan. He said these issues aren't less important, there are just a lot of on- going issues that also need addressing so all projects need to be evaluated with the resources the City has. He stated that staff is working with Minneapolis and St. Louis Park on bicycle and pedestrian issues and added that education and enforcement are also parts of the on-going process that the City will continue to work on. Segelbaum asked if there are things that aren't a great cost that could be done to help the situation such as signage. Oliver said that in general, signage is not that effective. He said enforcement can be effective but again, it is a matter of resources and an officer can't be there all of the time. Cera asked if the City would consider a 3-way stop at the Quentin and Natchez intersection. Oliver said his opinion is that non-compliance and crashes will escalate if stop signs are put in where they are not warranted. He added that studies have shown that people speed up after the stop sign in order to make up for lost time. He reiterated that there is no single thing that will solve the issues, but that some improvements along with education and enforcement will help. Blum asked if there is anything preventing the City to require a congestion tax or a one- way toll onto Quentin during rush hour. Oliver said that would not be statutorily permitted in the State of Minnesota. Waldhauser asked if there is any way to separate the neighborhood from Wayzata Blvd. and direct all traffic to a street on the south side. Oliver said that could be done, but there would be unintended consequences and emergency response would be an issue. Kluchka asked if the City would consider limiting the exits onto Wayzata Blvd. Oliver said that can be continued to be reviewed, but typically the City wants multiple access points for emergencies. He added that not allowing access to the east will create problems elsewhere, and the access to Wayzata Blvd. can't be cut entirely. Kluchka asked if the traffic can be revisited each year, or after each phase of development. Oliver said traffic counts can be added to this area and he would not be opposed to reviewing the area two years after it is built out. Kluchka suggested revisiting the traffic issues when the PUD is amended for the office phase. Baker said a PUD is supposed to benefit the City and he feels in many ways this project is benefitting the City, but one thing he thinks is lacking is the City's response to the traffic issues on Wayzata Blvd. He said he isn't convinced that stop signs on Wayzata Blvd. wouldn't be an inexpensive benefit to the neighborhood. He said maybe the stop signs would increase accidents but he is not concerned about that if those accidents are the fault of the people who are ignoring the signs. He is concerned about the neighborhood not being able to turn onto Wayzata Blvd. and he believes stop signs at Natchez and June might be a way to discourage people from using Wayzata Blvd. He said he agrees that it is a very fast, hard-to-access road and he is inclined to make a Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission March 9, 2015 Page 9 motion requiring that the project be conditioned on the developer paying for traffic solutions on Wayzata Blvd. which may even include a traffic light at Quentin. He said he thinks the options are being dismissed too readily. Segelbaum said he thinks this is a wonderful project, but the major issue is the traffic. He said the professional traffic study says a 3-way stop is warranted at the Quentin/Wayzata intersection so he tends to rely on that. He added that he would like to see what else could be done without using CIP resources. Waldhauser said she believes there are issues that have been here a long time and she doesn't think it should be incumbent on the developer to fix 20 year old issues. She said she thinks it's incumbent on Golden Valley and St. Louis Park to figure out what can be done about the traffic issues this neighborhood. She said she would like to make a recommendation that the City come up with a plan that will provide more certainty to the neighborhood. Kluchka asked if the City would consider exploring non-capital intensive traffic calming improvements. Zimmerman said the issues can be explored, but he questions who would make the decisions if they are not warranted by the traffic study. Segelbaum said he thinks the City Engineer could ultimately decide. Baker said he is not satisfied with the plan. He said a plan is nice, but it won't ensure that anything will happen. He said that the developer may not be directly responsible for the concerns they are hearing, but the cost of a couple of traffic signs in the context of multi- million dollar project is a rounding error. He said he is concerned that the City won't get around to it even if the Planning Commission insists that the City create a plan. He said this has been a problem for years and perhaps a change in ownership will be an opportunity to do something about the traffic problems that are only going to get worse. Cera said a PUD should focus on the development and the recommendations professional staff have made. He said he would entertain a second motion recommending that the City Council have a discussion about what they would like do about the traffic issues. Johnson said he doesn't think the City should penalize a developer for lack of action by the City. He added that this is the first significant change and opportunity for improvements in this area. Kluchka said he thinks the Planning Commission needs to make a strong statement about the traffic but he is not sure if the process allows them to make a separate motion. Baker said he thinks a motion could be made in the other business section on the agenda. Segelbaum said he would want motions made during the discussion of the item and not under other business. MOVED by Cera to recommend approval of the Final PUD plan proposal. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission March 9, 2015 Page 10 Waldhauser questioned if they should add a condition that another traffic study be done after build out is complete. Cera said he thinks that is a broader traffic issue. Waldhauser questioned if they should add a condition about further restricting egress to the east. Cera said doing that would not stop anybody from going to the east and it is safer having three exits from the ramp. Cera clarified that his motion incorporates staff conditions, Segelbaum seconded the motion and the motion carried unanimously to recommend approval of the Final PUD Plan for Central Park West PUD No. 121, subject to the following findings and conditions: Findings: 1. The PUD plan is tailored to the specific characteristics of the site and achieves a higher quality of site planning and design than generally expected under conventional provisions of the ordinance. 2. The PUD plan preserves and protects substantial desirable portions of the site's characteristics, open space and sensitive environmental features including steep slopes, trees, scenic views, creeks, wetlands, and open waters. 3. The PUD plan includes efficient and effective use (which includes preservation) of the land. 4. The PUD Plan results in development compatible with adjacent uses and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and redevelopment plans and goals. 5. The PUD plan is consistent with preserving and improving the general health, safety and general welfare of the people of the City. 6. The PUD plan meets the PUD Intent and Purpose provision and all other PUD ordinance provisions. Conditions: 1. The plans prepared by DLC Residential, LLC, submitted with the application on February 4, 2015, shall become a part of this approval. 2. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Engineering Division to the Planning Manager, dated March 4, 2015, shall become a part of this approval. 3. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Fire Department to the Planning Manager, dated March 2, 2015, shall become a part of this approval. The applicant shall address the remaining unresolved issues outlined in the memo prior to Final PUD approval. 4. All signage must meet the requirements of the City's Sign Code (Section 4.20). 5. A park dedication fee of $70,568 (2% of the estimated land value) shall be paid prior to approval of the Final Plat. 6. The Final Plat shall include "P.U.D." in its title. 7. This approval is subject to all other state, federal, and local ordinances, regulations, or laws with authority over this development. 8. The City of St. Louis Park approves that portion of the preliminary Planned Unit Development within its jurisdiction Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission March 9, 2015 Page 11 9. The property owners of any parcel in PUD No. 121 shall follow the Travel Demand Management Plan for the West End Redevelopment and Central Park West prepared by Kimley-Horn and submitted with the final PUD application in February 2015, which will serve to reduce traffic congestion. Prior to Final PUD approval, the applicant shall include specific target dates in this plan. The applicant shall pay the remaining 50% of the Traffic Management Administration Fees for Lot 1 when submitting a building permit application. The applicant or future property owner of Lot 3 and Outlot A shall pay the Traffic Management Administration Fees, as outlined in the City's 1-394 Overlay Zoning District Ordinance (Section 11.56). 10.The Developer shall enter into an agreement with the City of Golden Valley for public use of the park outlot. 11.Prior to the City signing and releasing the final plat to the developer for filing with Hennepin County, the PUD permit and Development Agreement shall be finalized between the City and the Developer. MOVED by Baker, seconded by Segelbaum and motion carried unanimously to recommend that the City Council address the traffic issues on Wayzata Blvd. raised by residents including: access, speed, safety, congestion, etc. Segelbaum said he would like to be specific about the area to be studied. Baker said the area of study should be Wayzata Blvd. between France and Douglas. Informal Public Hearing —Zoni g Code Text Amendment— Size of Accessory Structures —Z000-97 licant: City of Golden Valle` Purpo To consider amending language in the Zoning Code a r to match the State Building Cade regarding the size of ssory structures (lowed before a building permit is required." Zimmerman stated that t ` State Building Code wat'cently revised to require building permits for accesso tructures±only ifI'iey exceed 200 square feet in size. He explained that the City's curet Zont�'6ode states that a building permit must be obtained if an accessory structure a ends 120 square feet in size. In order to keep the City's requirements consistervil' �. se of the State, staff is recommending that the Zoning Code be amend o require;bu�Iding permits for accessory structures if they exceed 200 square et. He stated that th&q is another section of the Zoning Code which limits th ype of roofs allov�ed on acc'e gory structures over 120 square feet that staff is r ommending that als ` be changed f200 square feet. Baker as if the City has a choice in '` mending the langu o in the Zoning Code. Zimm an said the language could b removed from the Zo Code and replaced wit anguage referring to the State's B, ilding Code requirement instead. Cera said would like to keep the language in t e Zoning Code. rif y 01 _ Planning 763-593-8095/763-593-8109(fax) Date: March 9, 2015 To: Golden Valley Planning Commission From: Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager Emily Goellner, Associate Planner/Grant Writer Subject: Informal Public Hearing— Final PUD Plan for Central Park West PUD No. 121 — 1400 and 1500 State Highway 100 South, 5075 Wayzata Blvd, 1511 Utica Ave South — DLC Residential, LLC, Applicant Summary DLC Residential, LLC, is seeking approval of a Final Planned Unit Development (PUD) Permit to develop several buildings and a parking ramp at the southwest quadrant of 1-394 and Highway 100. This PUD proposal is unique in that it is located in both the City of Golden Valley and the City of St. Louis Park. In order to promote high quality site planning, staff at both cities have analyzed the same site plan set simultaneously. The Preliminary PUD application was approved by the City of St. Louis Park City Council on December 15 and Goldenkpge R ��„ .. Valley City Council on December 16. The ri property is zoned for Business and Professional Offices in Golden Valley and ". it is guided for long-term office use on - •" = / sr the General Land Use Plan map. The r + YE16th Strei t �# total area of site is 13.48 acres with 6 > acres in Golden Valley. The proposed " �"' PUD would allow the applicant to construct two 6-story multi-family .,p„ residential buildings, one 6-story limited ,North f x. r4/l + arc' service hotel, a 7-story parking ramp, . , , _ dC L two 11-story office buildings, and a park. Currently, the site isrimaril covered <.f N Y _ by impervious surface. Page 1 Site Map i 1-394 nr+ 0 Ill Yr !� LPA15 " -16th Street a " r , • PUD Site Boundary Site Background City Boundary This is a unique PUD site because it is located in two cities. The portion of the site in St. Louis Park is located in the city's West End Redevelopment Area and Tax Increment Financing (TIF) district. The TIF district was approved in 2007 to pay for street and infrastructure improvements for the West End development, owned by Duke Realty. Duke received preliminary approval in 2009 from City of Golden Valley and City of St. Louis Park for the Towers at West End preliminary plan, which included four office towers and a parking ramp. However, Duke has not applied for final approval. Both cities have granted several extensions to allow more time to submit the final PUD application. The applicant for PUD No. 121, DLC Residential, LLC, intends to purchase the land from Duke Realty. The site plan in review today was influenced by Duke Realty's Towers at West End plan and by other site conditions. Two key conditions include the border of the TIF district in St. Louis Park and the proximity of the large retaining walls bordering the two major highways. DLC recently developed the Millennium at West End apartments and if final PUD approval is granted, they plan to own and operate the two residential buildings and the park. DLC intends to sell the land slated for the hotel, offices, and parking ramp to developers that specialize in those types of development. Amendments to this PUD would be required by both Cities prior to construction. Page 2 Site Plan Summary and Analysis Lot 1: Residential Phase 1 _ The first phase of multi-family residential development would , iLi �l include 199 units, consisting primarily of one-bedroom and " L'i. two-bedroom units. Three-bedroom units, alcoves, and units NWC01lNSPM W" itFlIl01AN0iCwE with dens would also be provided. The majority of parking RAN spaces, 164 spaces, would be provided underground. On the first floor of the building, 71 spaces would be provided, but would not be visible from the street. To reach the minimum parking requirement, 33 spaces would be tandem parking �� RESIDENnALPHASE 1 SPO1r -Mures spaces. There would also be 25 parking spaces provided on A"'W'a"'"" the east side of the building in a small surface lot. The lobby would be located off of Utica Avenue and 6 guest parking _ spaces would be designated in the "woonerf," which is a Dutch term for a living street in which all modes of traffic b ' "`g'MAW LU move at walking pace, guided by design elements that calm traffic. The rooms would range in size from 550 square feet to 1,500 square feet. Rents would range from approximately $1,000/month to $2,800/month depending on the size and location of the unit. Some units would be made affordable North with rent at 60%of the area median income. Lot 1 comparison to R-4 Zoning District Regulations* Note:Many requirements within the underlying zoning district are flexible in a PUD approval Factor Required Proposed Use Multiple-Family Residential permitted Multiple-Family Residential Height -- 6 stories Density 12 units/acre minimum 57.51 units/acre Floor Area Ratio -- 1.41 Ground Floor Area Ratio .45 maximum .35 Structure Coverage 45%maximum 35% Impervious Surface 60%maximum 74.28% Setbacks Front: 25' Side:20' Front: 15' Side:0' Rear: 20' Side: 20' Rear: 60' Side: 0' Lot Area 20,000 square feet minimum 101,495 square feet Car Parking 1.5 spaces per dwelling 321 spaces 1.5 spaces x 199 dwellings= 298.5 spaces *The site is zoned for Office, but this is a comparison of the proposed residential building to its comparable zoning district in Golden Valley,whichis R-4 High Density Residential Outlot A: Park On the site plan, the public gathering space is identified as a linear park. A linear park is a park that is substantially longer than it is wide. The park would act as a connection for pedestrians and bicyclists between the west and east side of the site. The 37,897 square foot park would be Page 3 privately owned by the applicant and a public access easement would be established to ensure perpetual public use. The specific design of the park will be informed by discussions with Parks and Planning staff at City of Golden Valley and City of St. Louis Park. The park will be privately maintained. In response to staff's request, the applicant has agreed to provide pavement markings on one of the paths in the park to distinguish between bike traffic and pedestrian traffic. Lot 2: Residential Phase 2: The second phase of residential development, located entirely in St. Louis Park, is identified as Lot 2/Residential Phase 2 on the site plan. There are 164 units proposed for this building, which would consist primarily of one-bedroom and two-bedroom units with some three-bedroom units, alcove units, and units with dens. Like the residential building on Lot 1, the majority of parking spaces would be provided underground, totaling 169 spaces. On the first floor, 79 spaces would be provided, but would not be visible from the street. No tandem parking is proposed. The lobby would be located off of Utica Avenue and -- - - - the woonerf, where 4 guest parking LOT 2-RESIDENTIAL PHASE 2 spaces would also be designated. Very 6 STORES-iat uNfTS 79-IST LEMSTALLS ; similar to the first phase of residential 156-UNDERGROUNDSTALLS � development, the rooms would range in ,` Jr size from 550 square feet to 1,500 square A r feet. Rents would range from W ,I approximately$1,000/month to r $2,800/month depending on the size and i location of the unit. Some units would be III North made affordable with rent at 60%of the area median income. Lot 2 comparison to R-4 Zoning District Regulations* Note:Many requirements within the underlying zoning district are flexible in a PUD approval Factor Required Proposed Use Multiple-Family Residential permitted Multiple-Family Residential Hegbt -- 6 stories Density 12 units/acre minimum 107.19 units/acre Floor Area Ratio -- 2.58 Ground Floor Area Ratio .45 maximum .72 Structure Coverage 45%maximum 72/ Impervious Surface 60% maximum 77.12/ Setbacks Front: 25' Side: 20' Front: 10' Side: 0' Rear: 20' Side: 20' Rear:0' Side:0' Lot Area 20,000 square feet minimum 72,310 square feet Car Parking 1.5 spaces per dwelling 235 spaces 1.5 spaces x 164 dwellings=246 spaces *The site is zoned for Office,but this is a comparison of the proposed residential building to its comparable zoning district in Golden Valley,which is R-4 High Density Residential Page 4 Lot 3: Hotel The 6-story hotel would provide up to 150 rooms. The entrance and surface parking would be located �� LOT 3-HOTEL � off of Wayzata Boulevard. Underground parking 6 ffMES-1W PONS 90-UNDOMWOt1 MAW , would also be provided. In both St. Louis Park and Golden Valley, hotels must provide at least 1.5 parking spaces per room, which requires a total of 225 spaces for this development. With 66 surface MA_ ; � { lot spaces and 27 underground spaces totaling 93 spaces,there is not an adequate amount of parking ! provided. The applicant is exploring ways to �� .►, �S'�, , provide additional underground parking, a shared parking agreement with the office ramp, ora combination of the two. The hotel would be .= limited-service, so a restaurant, pool, and other such amenities would not be provided. Limited-service hotels are typically more budget-friendly, employ a smaller staff, and are less costly to operate than full-service hotels. Lot 3 comparison to Commercial Zoning District Regulations* Note:Many requirements within the underlying zoning district are flexible in a PUD approval Factor Required Proposed Use Hotel permitted Hotel&surface parking lot Height 3 stories(more permitted with 6 stories Conditional Use Permit) Floor Area Ratio -- 1.21 Ground Floor Area Ratio -- ,2 Structure Coverage 50%maximum 20% Impervious Surface -- 75.78% Setbacks Front: 35' Front: 15' Side: 30' Side: 0' Side: 30' Side: 0' Rear: 30' Rear: 10' Lot Area -- 1.61 acres Car Parking 1.5 spaces/unit 85 spaces on Lot 3.An additional 1.5 spaces x 150 units=225 spaces 140 parking spaces have been provided in parking ramp on Outlot A to meet minimum parking requirement *The site is zoned for Office, but this is a comparison of the proposed hotel building to its comparable zoning district in Golden Valley,which is Commercial zoning. Page 5 Outlot A: Offices & Parking Ramp: Two 11-story office buildings and a 7-story parking ramp are proposed for Outlot A on the south side of the PUD site. The ramp was placed close to the large retaining wall bordering Highway 100 and the offices were placed near existing offices to the west and south. The largest and most visible access point to the parking ramp would be off Utica Avenue and parking - -- --- ' ramp entrances would also UNE„ be provided along Lilac Drive . ,�,,;md on the south and east sides PU OUTLOT A-OFFICE OUTLOT A-OFFICE of the ramp. In each office PHASE2 PHASE building, 50 underground stalls would be provided. A ,,,,,,,NES / 1 wain i a� large drop-off area would be t'. aunOTA located at the entrance to r " each building. The applicant CITY OF ST LdU15P/1 c intends to sell Outlot A to an s -t-.�-- '* I#�pt o 1 ,, , vim ;;F i ,®SEN.R r r — office developer for further design, construction, and W - management. The parking �€ _ ramp would cross the municipal boundary with the majority located in Golden Valley. Outlot A comparison to Business&Professional Offices Zoning DistrictRegulations Note:Many requirements within the underlying zoning district are flexible in a PUD approval Factor Required Proposed Use Office and structured parking 2 office buildings& 1 parking ramp permitted Height 3 stories (more permitted with 11 stories—offices Conditional Use Permit) 7 stories—parking ramp Floor Area Ratio -- 2.35 Ground Floor Area Ratio .40 maximum .21 (for offices only) Structure Coverage 40%maximum 21%(for offices only) Impervious Surface 60%maximum 82.60% Setbacks Front: 75' Front: varies Side: 60' Side:varies Side: 60' Side:varies Rear: 60' Rear:varies Lot Area Minimum 1 acre 7.01 acres Car Parking 1 space per 250 square 2,494 spaces 353,353 square feet_250= 1,413.4= 1,414 spaces required x 2 buildings= 2,828 spaces required Page 6 Parking Of the 3,598 spaces required, the site plan provides 3,275 spaces, which is equivalent to roughly 91% of the total required parking. The site plan is lacking a total of 323 spaces according to Golden Valley regulations. St. Louis Park requires less parking than Golden Valley for office and residential uses, so the total parking required by St. Louis Park standards is 2,959 spaces, which is less than what is proposed. During the preliminary approval process, staffs at both Cities directed the applicant to address parking shortages for the hotel. In response, the applicant has located 140 parking spaces in the office ramp. Those spaces will be designated for hotel users. This arrangement will be further analyzed when the applicant applies for an amendment to the PUD to build the hotel, offices, and parking ramp. Bike Parking The City of Golden Valley requires bike parking calculated as at least 5%of the required car parking. The City of St. Louis Park requires 10%. There are 112 bike parking spaces planned for Residential Phase 1, which is equivalent to 35%of the total amount of car spaces. On Residential Phase 2, 100 bike parking spaces are provided, which is equivalent to 42%of the total amount of car spaces. Affordable Housing DLC has proposed providing 3%affordable units at 60%of the area median income (based on 2014 AMI rates). The affordable units would consist of eight (8) alcove units, one (1) 1-bedroom, and two (2) 1-bedroom units with a den. This would provide a total of eleven (11) affordable units. Joint Powers Agreement It was initially though by Staff that a Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) would be necessary to address issues that arise with a shared PUD site. After discussions between Staff and the City Attorney, it has been determined that a JPA will not be the appropriate mechanism to carry out the goals of the City for this project. The City cannot abdicate its authority to enforce its ordinances to another agency or entity with this type of contact. The issues, such as permitting or inspections for the structures that lie across the City boundary, can be addressed through service contracts. Each circumstance would require a unique contract that outlines the services provided and the revenues received. In the absence of a JPA or any service contracts, services and fees would be executed on either side of the municipal boundary as they are today. As is being done with the initial approval, future changes or modifications to the PUD would require approval by both Golden Valley and St. Louis Park. Signs and Lighting Applications to erect signage have not been submitted. Sign permitting will be separated by city boundaries. A detailed lighting plan was submitted with the final PUD application. The lighting plan complies with the outdoor lighting requirements in the Golden Valley City Code, which is generally more restrictive than the St. Louis Park City Code. Page 7 Construction Phasing An overall phasing plan is provided on plat sheet PH-0 of the plan submittal. Utica Avenue will be constructed in the first phase of development, which will begin in spring 2015 if final approval is granted by both cities. Phase 1 residential and the park will also be completed in the first phase. The second phase will include the second residential building at the corner of Wayzata Boulevard and Utica Avenue and will occur from spring 2016 to fall 2017. The hotel will be constructed in the third phase of development, which will require an amendment to the PUD. At this phase, detailed building elevations and parking will be further examined. The exact timing of the hotel and office development may vary based on market conditions. The office is expected to be developed in the fourth and fifth phases, which would occur between spring 2016 and fall 2020. Since the proposed offices and parking ramp are located on an outlot, an amendment to the PUD that includes a final plat will be required before building permits are issued. Engineering Traffic Generally, traffic will circulate around the site on a soon-to-be reconstructed Utica Avenue South and the Wayzata Boulevard south frontage road. The 2014 AUAR update projects a reduction of traffic levels in the PM peak and a slight increase in the AM peak. Previous traffic projections prompted Golden Valley to recommend intersection and road improvements to the east of the site at the intersection with Quentin Avenue and east along Wayzata Boulevard. Due to concerns expressed by residents during the preliminary PUD review process, City Council required that the AUAR be updated and an additional neighborhood meeting be hosted by the applicant. The AUAR update was completed by Kimley-Horn on January 19, 2015 and the neighborhood meeting was hosted on January 28, 2015. The results of the AUAR update and expectations for traffic impact mitigation by the applicant are further explained in the memo from the Engineering Division dated March 4, 2015. Site Access& Circulation The site is bisected by an east-west liner park that provides a major pedestrian and bicycle link between the West End and the underpass to Highway 100. Additional sidewalks internal to the site connect the proposed uses and a new sidewalk is planned along Utica Avenue. An existing sidewalk along Wayzata Boulevard will remain. Automobile access to the office towers is from the Utica to the west, as it the primary access to the parking structure. Additional, secondary, access to the parking structure is from Wayzata Boulevard to the east. The residential buildings and the hotel would have multiple access points along Utica and Wayzata Boulevard. The combined service area for Lots 1, 2, and 3 (hotel and two apartment buildings) would be tucked into the woonerf between the three buildings. Pavement treatments and design elements would slow vehicles and allow for the mixing of pedestrians and automobiles. The applicant has agreed to limit garbage pick-up to one servicer, reducing the number of trucks that would have to enter the area. Page 8 The site is currently served by transit routes 9, 604, and 649. West 16th Street at its intersection with Utica has already been constructed to accommodate bus service. Metro Transit has indicated they are examining options for incorporating the new development into their existing routes. Landscaping& Tree Preservation The applicant has submitted landscaping plans which indicate a significant concentration of trees and landscaping around the perimeter of the site, as well as within the central park. As outlined in the memo from the Engineering Division, the City Forester will review the plans in more detail and work to alleviate concerns regarding potential corner visibility issues. A Tree Preservation Permit will be required before construction begins. Financial securities will be required to cover the cost of any landscaping replacement during the two-year warranty period. Easements& Utilities An existing 20 foot wide watermain easement exists along the eastern boundary of the PUD. This easement will remain in place as the project is constructed. There is an existing shared operation and access agreement in place over the privately owned Lilac Drive which will also remain. Dedication of additional drainage and utility easements along all streets, property lines, and plat boundaries will be required as part of the final plat. An Alternate Urban Area-wide Review (AUAR) analysis was completed in 2007 and updated in 2013 based on previous proposals for the West End and for this site. A new update was conducted in October of 2014 to compare the impacts of the current proposal to those identified previously. Sanitary sewer and water usage under the revised scenario both remained below the limits of what can be accommodated, though the water system capacity rose above the preferred 90%total system use for St. Louis Park. Current plans indicate all sanitary sewer and water services will be provided by St. Louis Park. Long term capacity concerns regarding water may suggest that one or more properties could receive water service from Golden Valley. Stormwater& Impervious Surface The entire development drains into the Minnehaha Creek Watershed and the two cities have agreed that St. Louis Park will coordinate the review of the Stormwater Management Plan for the entire PUD with the developer and the watershed. As phased development occurs, individual properties within Golden Valley must obtain Stormwater Management Permits from the City. The amount of impervious surface for the entire PUD is estimated to be 79%. Golden Valley PUD standards require the amount to remain under 90%for Mixed Use projects that include housing, retail, and office. Page 9 Fire Safety The Fire Department reviewed this proposal to ensure that all buildings are equipped with fire protections systems and that adequate emergency vehicle access is achieved on the site. A memorandum from the Fire Department that addresses fire access, water supply, and fire hydrant location is attached. A handful of issues remain and must be addressed and approved by the Fire Department prior to Final PUD Plan approval. Findings for Approval In order to be approved as a PUD, the City must be able to make the following findings: 1. Quality Site Planning. The PUD plan is tailored to the specific characteristics of the site, such as the proximity to high retaining walls and highway traffic to the north and east and high-density development to the south and west. With flexibility under a PUD in uses allowed, setbacks, height, parking requirements, number of buildings on a lot, and similar requirements, the quality of site planning and design is of higher quality than if each parcel was designed individually under conventional provisions. By allowing a mix of land uses, the site plan offers the opportunity to live, work, visit, and enjoy outdoor gathering space. The PUD encourages creativity and flexibility in land development. 2. Preservation. The PUD plan preserves and protects substantial desirable portions of the site's characteristics, open space and sensitive environmental features including steep slopes,trees, scenic views, creeks, wetlands, and open waters. The site is currently used for surface parking and is mostly impervious. Even though 36 existing trees will be removed, the proposed plan adds about 37,897 square feet of public gathering space, roughly 245 trees, and 19,742 square feet of shrubs and perennial beds to the site. 3. Efficient & Effective. The PUD plan includes efficient and effective use of the land. The PUD plan provides an appropriate area of the city for high-density office, residential, and hotel uses. The PUD plan encourages development that is sustainable and has a high degree of energy efficiency. 4. Compatibility. The PUD Plan results in development compatible with adjacent uses and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and redevelopment plans and goals. High-density office, commercial, and residential uses surround the site to the south and west. low- density residential uses are separated from this proposed PUD site by significant highway development. The PUD plan increases housing options,jobs, lodging options, and gathering space to the area. 5. General Health. The PUD plan is consistent with preserving and improving the general health, safety and general welfare of the people of the City. By encouraging the use of contemporary land planning principles, the PUD plan offers the ability to live, work, shop, and spend time outdoors without reliability on the automobile. The PUD plan promotes pedestrian activity and provides high-quality landscaping additions to the site. 6. Meets Requirements. The PUD plan meets the PUD Intent and Purpose provision and all other PUD ordinance provisions. The PUD provision permits flexibility from other provisions in Chapter 11 of the City Code. This flexibility is permitted in order to promote the intent and purpose of the PUD section of the City Code. Page 10 Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the Final Plan for Central Park West PUD No. 121, subject to the following conditions: 1. The plans prepared by DLC Residential, LLC, submitted with the application on February 4, 2015, shall become a part of this approval. 2. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Engineering Division to the Planning Manager, dated March 4, 2015, shall become a part of this approval. 3. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Fire Department to the Planning Manager, dated March 2, 2015, shall become a part of this approval. The applicant shall address the remaining unresolved issues outlined in the memo prior to final PUD approval. 4. All signage must meet the requirements of the City's Sign Code (Section 4.20). 5. A park dedication fee of$70,568 (2%of the estimated land value) shall be paid prior to approval of the Final Plat. 6. The Final Plat shall include "P.U.D." in its title. 7. This approval is subject to all other state,federal, and local ordinances, regulations, or laws with authority over this development. 8. The City of St. Louis Park approves that portion of the preliminary planned unit development within its jurisdiction 9. The property owners of any parcel in the PUD No. 121 shall follow the Travel Demand Management Plan for the West End Redevelopment and Central Park West prepared by Kimley-Horn and submitted with the final PUD application in February 2015, which will serve to reduce traffic congestion. Prior to final PUD approval, the applicant shall include specific target dates in this plan. The applicant shall pay the remaining 50%of the Traffic Management Administration Fees for Lot 1 when submitting a building permit application. The applicant or future property owner of Lot 3 and Outlot A shall pay the Traffic Management Administration Fees, as outlined in the City's 1-394 Overlay Zoning District Ordinance (Section 11.56). 10. The Developer shall enter into an agreement with the City of Golden Valley for public use of the park outlot. 11. Prior to the City signing and releasing the final plat to the developer for filing with Hennepin County,the PUD permit and Development Agreement shall be finalized between the City and the Developer. Attachments Location Map (1 page) Memo from the Engineering Division dated March 4, 2015 (9 pages) Memo from the Fire Department dated March 2, 2015 (3 pages) Travel Demand Management Plan submitted February 4, 2015 (9 pages) AUAR update dated January 19, 2015 (55 pages) Site Plans submitted February 4, 2015 (76 pages) Page 11 01 c vaney Physical Development Department Y P P 763-593-8095/763-593-8109 (fax) Date: March 27, 2015 To: Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager From: Jeff Oliver, PE, City Engineer Eric Eckman, Public Works Specialist Subject: Central Park West—Final PUD Review Engineering,staff has reviewed the plans for the proposed Central Park West development, submitted by DLC Residential (Developer). The proposed development is located in the southwest corner of Interstate 394 and Trunk Highway 100 and replaces a previously approved proposal from Duke Realty for construction of four office towers and a parking ramp. The proposed development consists of a mix of residential apartments, office, hotel, and public open space uses. The majority of this site is located within the City of St. Louis Park. However, the eastern portion of the site is located within the City of Golden Valley, immediately adjacent to Highway 100 and Wayzata Boulevard (the south frontage road for 1-394).This memorandum focuses on the portion of the project located in Golden Valley and discusses issues identified during the Engineering review that must be addressed prior to final plat submittal. The comments contained within this review are based on the plans submitted to the City on February 4, 2015 and the revFsed plans dated March 20, 2015. Site Plan The portion of the proposed PUD within the City of Golden Valley includes the construction of the following: • Part of a six-story apartment building which extends across the city limit line (Lot 1, Block 1) • A portion of the linear park open space (public easement within Lot 1, Block 1) • A surface parking lot for the hotel site (Lot 3, Block 1) • An eight-level parking ramp adjacent to the proposed offices (shown on Outlot A) The Developer has provided an overall phasing plan as part of the final PUD plan submittal. According to the phasing plan, construction would be as follows: • Phase 1— Utica Avenue improvements, Apartment building on Lot 1, Block 1 which straddles the city limits line, and the Linear Park • Phase 2—Apartments on Lot 2, Block 1 in St. Louis Park • Phase 3 —The hotel on Lot 3, Block 1 (hotel parking lot in Golden Valley) • Phases 4 and 5—Offices and parking structure on Outlot A The Developer has submitted a temporary parking, staging, and access plan related to each phase of construction. It is anticipated that staff from Golden Valley and St. Louis Park will work together with the Developer to ensure that the plan is carried out successfully. The City of Golden Valley reserves the right to work with the Developer and Contractor to require modifications to the plan if situations arise that negatively impact traffic, pedestrian safety, infrastructure, or water quality. The Developer proposes three permanent access points onto Wayzata Boulevard in Golden Valley. One of these access points is an existing private street (labeled Lilac Drive) serving several properties on the west side of Highway 100, south of this PUD. This street intersects Wayzata Boulevard in the middle of a sharp curve just west of Highway 100. The other two proposed access points are north of this intersection and will serve the new uses described above. Since the preliminary PUD was reviewed, the Developer addressed the City's concerns about access and shifted the center driveway access to the north to provide additional separation and to discourage cut-through traffic movements to Utica Avenue. The plan modifications are therefore acceptable as proposed. The development includes the removal of existing driveway entrances and the construction of new entrances. Therefore, a City Right-of-Way Management Permit is required. All driveway entrances must meet the City standards for commercial driveway aprons. Plans submitted by the Developer show the construction of pedestrian facilities through the linear park open space to promote east-west movements between Utica Avenue and Wayzata Boulevard. The plans also show pedestrian facilities connecting all new structures and parking lots to the City's existing sidewalk along Wayzata Boulevard. All new pedestrian facilities must meet Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accessibility standards. In addition, the City of Golden Valley must be party to all easements dedicated by the Developer for the public use of certain sidewalks and trails located both inside and outside of the linear park open space, within the City of Golden Valley. The Developer must draft the legal descriptions, exhibits, and easement documents for review by the City. The documents must include provisions identifying that the Developer must maintain these walks and trails during the winter. Copies of all recorded easements must be submitted to the Engineering office before the issuance of permits. The City of Golden Valley owns and maintains the existing concrete sidewalk on the south and west side of Wayzata Boulevard adjacent to this PUD. This existing sidewalk extends to the east C:\Users\lwittmanWppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\ECPXYP46\CPW_Final PUD review revised032715.docx under Highway 100 to connect with the existing sidewalk on Wayzata Boulevard/Quentin Avenue on the east side of the highway. The plans indicate that the existing sidewalk on Wayzata will remain in place during and after construction. As part of the development, the Developer must install curb ramps meeting ADA accessibility standards and City standards at all street and driveway crossings, as directed by the City Engineer. The Developer will also be responsible for replacing any portions of the existing sidewalk that are damaged during construction. The Developer must include a City of Golden Valley standard detail for pedestrian curb ramps in the final construction plans submitted for permitting. Staff from the cities of Golden Valley and St. Louis Park met with the Developer to discuss the options for long-term maintenance of the sidewalk on Wayzata Boulevard adjacent to this PUD. It was determined that the Developer or future property owner will maintain this portion of sidewalk in the winter, in a manner consistent with the City's sidewalk and trail winter maintenance policy. This will be included in the operations and maintenance agreement for the development. All public sidewalks parallel to Wayzata Boulevard must be located within platted right-of-way or dedicated walkway easements. If easements are required, the Developer must submit legal descriptions, exhibits, and draft easement documents for review by the City, prior to the consideration of final plat approval. A City Right-of-Way Management Permit is required for all excavations and obstructions within public right-of-way including sidewalk construction. Traffic Management In 2007, the City of St. Louis Park prepared an Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) for the PUD that was brought forth and approved at that time. The purpose of the AUAR was to determine potential impacts from the development to adjacent facilities and to evaluate potential environmental impacts. The AUAR included a traffic analysis of the development, which was reviewed by the City's consulting Traffic Engineer, Mike Kotila, of SEH, Inc. The primary recommendations at that time was to modify the intersection of Wayzata Boulevard and Quentin Avenue on the east side of Highway 100 by making it an all-way stop and providing additional turn lanes to better accommodate the increased traffic and vehicle stacking in the area. In addition, a recommendation was made to consider implementing potential traffic calming, pedestrian accommodations and sight-line improvements along the south 1-394 Frontage Road (Wayzata Boulevard) east of TH 100, The Developer of this PUD has updated the previously approved AUAR traffic analysis to reflect the change of uses and traffic projections in the current Central Park West PUD. The updated AUAR analysis and PUD plans have been forwarded to the City's Traffic Engineer for review and a copy of his review dated February 13, 2015 is attached to this memo for reference. As outlined in the February 13th memo, Mr. Kotila reviewed the Developer's trip generation and distributions, as well as other assumptions, and found them to be sound. In addition, Mr. Kotila concurs that the conclusions in the 2007 AUAR, and those reached in the updated study, are still valid. Again, C:\Users\lwittmanWppDatalocal\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\ECPXYP46\CPW_Final PUD review revised032715.docx the primary recommendation remains that due to the decrease in the level of service at Wayzata Boulevard and Quentin Avenue resulting from the PUD, the turn-lane improvements still need to be implemented. The February 13th memorandum also addresses the traffic calming, pedestrian and sight line concerns identified in 2007. The study concludes that the increase in traffic resulting from the current PUD proposal does not create any new, or unduly add to,the existing traffic issues on Wayzata Boulevard. Therefore, staff is not recommending that this Developer be responsible for additional improvements on Wayzata Boulevard. Due to the nature of the existing traffic concerns on Wayzata Boulevard east of TH 100, staff will begin the process of proposing future projects for consideration in the City's Capital Improvement Program (CIP) process. Staff will also begin looking for other potential funding sources to finance the construction of traffic calming, sight line, and pedestrian and bicycle improvements along Wayzata Boulevard. Because the recommended improvements at Wayzata Boulevard and Quentin Avenue can be directly attributed to the proposed PUD, the Developer will be required to fund these improvements. The intersection improvements will be constructed by the City as a public improvement project with an estimated total project cost of$250,000. Therefore, the Developer will be required to post an escrow with the City in this amount. This escrow must be posted prior to the consideration of final plat approval. Proposed Final Plat As discussed earlier in this review, portions of this PUD are located in both Golden Valley and St. Louis Park. The three existing parcels in Golden Valley are comprised of both platted and unplatted properties. The south two parcels contain portions of the Kavlis Cedardale plat of record. City records indicate that the streets and alleys within Kavlis Cedardale have been vacated. The City of Golden Valley has an 8-inch ductile iron watermain within a 20-foot wide watermain easement (Document No. 2491260) along the eastern boundary of the PUD. The Developer has shown and labeled this easement on the preliminary plat. This watermain easement must remain in place and therefore will not be vacated. The proposed final plat for this development includes the dedication of drainage and utility easements along streets, property lines, and plat boundaries consistent with the City's Subdivision Ordinance. However, the Developer must also dedicate a public drainage and utility easement over the portion of Lot 3 (hotel site) that is proposed for an underground stormwater treatment system. It is anticipated that the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) will oversee and ensure the long-term inspection and maintenance of this system by the Developer or future property owner. Therefore, it is the understanding of staff that the City of Golden Valley will have no future ownership, maintenance responsibility, or maintenance oversight of this stormwater treatment system. C:\Users\Iwittman\HppData\LocaRMicrosoft\Windows\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\ECPXYP46\CPW_Final PUD review revised032715.docx Utilities (Water and Sanitary Sewer) The plans submitted show that all uses in the PUD will receive sanitary sewer and water service from the City of St. Louis Park. The one exception to this, identified in the revised plans submitted March 20, 2015, is the construction of a 6-inch fire service and hydrant on the south side of the future hotel site (Lot 3). The Developer will be making a connection to the City of Golden Valley's watermain within Wayzata Boulevard. Therefore, a right-of-way management permit is required. The hydrant will be owned and maintained by the Developer or future property owner. A City standard detail for the hydrant installation must be included in the final construction plans for permitting, and the hydrant must be an AVK Dry Barrel series 2700. The Developer must enter into a maintenance agreement with the City to outline the ownership and maintenance responsibilities for the hydrant and fire line. In the original AUAR prepared by the City of St. Louis Park, Golden Valley identified a capacity issue with MCES Sanitary Sewer Interceptor 1-GV-461. The Golden Valley concern was that additional sewer flows would be generated from the PUD before the completion of the MCES Forcemain Reliever project. However, the delay in construction of the PUD has allowed MCES to complete several phases of construction. It appears now that the MCES Lift Station and final phase of the Reliever project will be constructed in 2015 and should be completed and operational before completion of the PUD. The Developer must show and label the planned location of the MCES forcemain on the final construction plans submitted for permit application. Stormwater Management The proposed development is located within the Minnehaha Creek Watershed and ultimately flows to Brownie Lake in Minneapolis. As such, plan review and permitting will be required by the MCWD. Because most of the stormwater improvements are located within the City of St. Louis Park, St. Louis Park staff has agreed to coordinate the review of the stormwater management plan with the MCWD for the entire PUD to ensure the plan meets MCWD, St. Louis Park, and Golden Valley requirements. This coordination includes the drafting and recording of all maintenance agreements necessary to ensure the permanent stormwater treatment facilities are adequately inspected and maintained into the future. Coordination by St. Louis Park and MCWD may also include permitting and inspection of the temporary erosion and sediment control measures associated with the initial phases of development, if not specific to any one parcel. Staff from both cities and MCWD will review the construction phasing plan together to determine how to proceed with this effort, before permits are issued. In addition to a MCWD permit, the City of Golden Valley will require that the Developer obtain a City Stormwater Management Permit for each parcel within the City of Golden Valley, as phased development occurs. C:\Users\lwittmanWppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\ECPXYP46\CPW_Final PUD review revised032715.docx This PUD is also subject to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's Construction Stormwater Permit. A copy of this permit must be submitted to the City before work can begin. There is one proposed storm sewer connection which will connect directly to the storm sewer system within Wayzata Boulevard. This connection will serve the future hotel site. A City Right-of- Way Management permit will be required for the excavation of Wayzata Boulevard and connection to the storm sewer system. Tree Preservation/Landscape Plan The portion of the PUD in Golden Valley is subject to the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance and Minimum Landscape Standards. A Landscape Plan and an inventory of significant trees were submitted by the Developer. A Tree Preservation Permit will be required before construction can begin. The City Forester will review the plans in more detail and work with the Developer on tree and shrub selection and location, and alleviate any potential corner visibility issues, before the issuance of permits. Summary and Recommendations Engineering staff recommends approval of the final PUD plans for Central Park West subject to the comments contained in this review, which are summarized as follows: 1. A City Right-of-Way Management Permit is required for all proposed excavations and obstructions within public rights-of-way and easements, including driveway, sidewalk, and storm sewer construction, as discussed in this review. 2. The Developer must install ADA curb ramps at all street and driveway crossings, and replace/reconstruct any portions of the City's sidewalk on Wayzata Boulevard that are damaged during construction, as discussed in this review. 3. The Developer must include a City of Golden Valley standard detail for pedestrian curb ramps in the final construction plans submitted for permitting. 4. The Developer is responsible for winter maintenance of the City's sidewalk on Wayzata Boulevard adjacent to this PUD, as discussed in this review. 5. The City of Golden Valley must be party to all easements dedicated by the Developer for the public use of certain sidewalks and trails located both inside and outside of the linear park open space, within the City of Golden Valley. Copies of all recorded easements must be submitted to the City. 6. The Developer will be required to fund the turn-lane improvements at the intersection of Wayzata Boulevard and Quentin Avenue, as discussed in this review, with an estimated total project cost of$250,000. The Developer must post an escrow with the City prior to the consideration of final plat approval. 7. The final plat for this development must include drainage and utility easements on a portion of Lot 3 (hotel site), as discussed in this review. 8. The Developer must show and label the planned location of the MCES Forcemain Reliever on the final construction plans submitted for permits. 9. A City standard detail for the hydrant installation must be included in the final construction plans for permitting, and the hydrant must be an AVK Dry Barrel series 2700. C:\Users\Iwittman\App Data\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\ECPXYP46\CPW_Final PUD review revised032715.docx 10. The Developer must enter into a maintenance agreement with the City to outline the ownership and maintenance responsibilities for the hydrant and fire line on Lot 3. 11. The Developer must obtain a City Stormwater Management Permit for each parcel within the City of Golden Valley, as phased development occurs. 12. This PUD is also subject to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's Construction Stormwater Permit. A copy of this permit must be submitted to the City before work can begin. 13. The Developer must submit a copy of the permit from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District before work can begin. 14. A Tree Preservation Permit will be required for each phase of construction in Golden Valley before construction can begin. Approval is also subject to the review and comments of the City Attorney, other City staff, and other governmental entities such as the City of St. Louis Park, MCWD, MnDOT, MCES, and MPCA. Please feel free to call me if you have any questions regarding this matter. Attachment C: Tom Burt, City Manager Marc Nevinski, Physical Development Director John Crelly, Fire Chief Emily Goellner, Associate Planner Jerry Frevel, Building Official Bert Tracy, Public Works Maintenance Manager Al Lundstrom, Park Maintenance Supervisor and City Forester Kelley Janes, Utilities Supervisor RJ Kakach, Engineer Tom Hoffman, Water Resources Technician C:\Users\lwittman\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\ECPXYP46\CPW_Final PUD review revised032715.docx —A SEH Building a Better World for All of Us' MEMORANDUM TO: Jeff Oliver, City Engineer City of Golden Valley FROM: Mike Kotila, PE Senior Transportation Engineer DATE: February 13, 2015 RE: Central Park West Traffic Analysis—SEH Review SEH No. 131241 14.00 This memorandum summarizes my review of the traffic analysis performed by Kimley Horn (KH)for the Central Park West development as documented in their January 15, 2015 (Revised January 19, 2015) memorandum with the subject line: West End AUAR Analysis Update—Response to City of Golden Valley Letter(dated December 26, 2014). General Comments • The KH analysis builds upon findings from the 2007 AUAR as documented in the Minneapolis West Redevelopment Traffic Analysis, dated November 2006, by SRF Consulting (2007 Study). The 2007 study fully analyzed a.m. and p.m. peak periods. The current analysis correctly identifies the pm peak hour as the time period of interest. SEH concurs that development trip generation in the a.m. peak period will not control decisions related to mitigation of intersection capacity or safety issues that are appropriate due to the development. • Data Collection—The KH study utilized a combination of sources for existing traffic volumes and historical speed data. KH disclosed circumstances at the time of data collection and any potentially unreliable portions of data that was collected. SEH concurs that enough data was successfully collected to sufficiently represent typical conditions for the purposes of their analysis. SEH does not believe that new data collection would lead to different findings or recommendations. • Trip Generation Methods and Assumptions—SEH concurs with the results reported in the KH study. • Trip Distribution—The KH study estimated that 15% of the development traffic would use Wayzata Boulevard. SEH considers this to be reasonable given that the site is positioned at the junction of two Principal Arterials providing access to jobs and homes in all parts of the Twin Cities. In addition, the site plan parking and building layout is designed with multiple alternative choices to enter and exit the site via Wayzata Boulevard (west), Park Place, 16th Street and Gamble Drive. Intersection of Wayzata Boulevard and Quentin Avenue • The KH study confirms findings from the 2007 study. SEH concurs, the intersection should be modified to include an eastbound right turn lane and a southbound right turn lane as mitigation to development traffic demands. • Signalization—The KH study examined the need for signalization at the Wayzata Boulevard and Quentin Avenue intersection. SEH concurs that a traffic signal will not be warranted. • Multi-way stop control—Based on intersection capacity(delay),the KH study identified that an all-way stop would be an effective measure when considered in conjunction with the recommended eastbound right turn lane. Further, the KH study identified that the combination of an eastbound right turn lane and a southbound right turn lane would not require an all-way stop control to operate at an Engineers I Architects I Planners I Scientists Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc.,10901 Red Circle Drive,Suite 300,Minnetonka,MN 55343-9302 SEH is 100%employee-owned I sehinc.com 1 952.912.2600 1 800.734.6757 1 888.908,8166 fax Central Park West Traffic Analysis—SEH Review February 13, 2015 Page 2 acceptable level of service. SEH recommends that the all way stop control be included with the addition of both right turn lanes as mitigation to development traffic impacts for several reasons. o The intersection serves as the only pedestrian crossing point from the Tyrol Hills neighborhood across(under)TH 100 to commercial areas west of TH 100 including the existing and proposed West End retail, entertainment, office and residential land uses. o Intersection delays will be minimized.An all-way stop will minimize queue length and delay on the eastbound approach, minimizing potential for queue conflict with the MnPASS exit and entrance to/from 1-394 which occur adjacent to the TH 100 bridge underpass. o Driver compliance and driver expectations-The underpass creates a geographic focal point in the street system. When considered in combination with intersection volumes, turning movements, pedestrian crossings and geometric conditions, an all-way stop will be perceived by drivers as reasonable and will therefore tend to encourage driver compliance. Traffic Calming and Safety Issues- • Existing safety issues along Wayzata Boulevard were identified and reviewed in 2007, by SRF, SEH and City staff. Recommendations included geometric changes to improve intersection sight distance at each cross street intersection in combination with trail improvements along the corridor. The KH study recognizes the existing deficiencies and assesses that while there is an anticipated increase in traffic demand along Wayzata Boulevard from the development, the increment of traffic growth due to development does not create a new problem or unduly add to the existing problem. SEH recommends that the City plan for improvements through other means (i.e. programming for safety improvements as a city funded objective, or in combination with outside trail improvement funding sources). • Traffic Speed—The KH study references speed studies reported by SEH in 2007 which indicated an average 85th percentile speed of 39 mph for both travel directions at all study locations reviewed. SEH believes that this data is representative of today's conditions for the following reasons: o Roadway and intersection geometry are the same today as in 2007. o Traffic volumes are similar. At the time of the speed study, the ADT of Wayzata Boulevard east of Quentin Avenue was 4220 vehicles per day. The 2015 ADT reported in the KH study is 3790. o Vehicle performance has not evolved dramatically such that driver speeds would have increased or decreased. mek p9fj\g\goldv\980100\west end dev\central park west 2014\seh review memo-final 021315,docx l ! fit, o� V a _er Fire Department 763-593-8079/763-593-8098 (fax) Date: March 25, 2015 To: Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager From: John Crelly, Fire Chief Subject: Final PUD—Central Park West, Southwest quadrant of 1-394 & Hwy 100 The Golden Valley Fire Department has reviewed the revised information for the Final PUD for Central Park West located at the Southwest quadrant of 1-394 & Hwy 100. The revised documents are dated March 20, 2015. This PUD is unique due to how this project overlays the City boundary lines of Golden Valley and St. Louis Park. This review is written as if the whole project is located in Golden Valley. Moving forward it will be necessary to have discussions with St. Louis Park to coordinate code items and concerns pertaining to fire department site/building access, water supply and fire protection systems. SITE This proposed development is bounded by Utica Avenue South (west side), 1-394/ Hwy 100 service drive (north/northeast side), Lilac Drive (east side) and a private road connecting Lilac Drive and Utica Avenue South (south side) of the property. All of the perimeter roads are a minimum of 24 feet in width. These roads provide good access to the area which has a total of six structures proposed in multiple phases. There is a private drive off of Utica Avenue South that provides access to the south office building, north office building and a parking ramp. The width of the road is 24 feet and is provided with what appears to be a compliant "hammer head" turn around, large enough to accommodate fire apparatus,just as you reach the parking ramp. This configuration is acceptable. There is a private drive off of Utica Avenue South that provides access to the residential phase 1 and phase 2 buildings. This private drive does continue to the east and it connects to the 1- 394/ Hwy 100 service drive. This road varies in width from 20 to 24 feet and has several turning movements in the area between the three buildings. On the plan, "Note 5" indicates this is intended for service vehicles only. Based on the revised drawing EX.3 dated March 2, 2015, there appears to be adequate turning radiuses and road width to maneuver a ladder truck through this area. Page 1 of 2 BUILDING / SITE In reviewing the requirements of MSFC section 503.1.1 of providing access to within 150 feet of all portions of the buildings there are two buildings that are compliant. They are the south office building and the hotel. The other buildings have varying degrees of not meeting this code requirement. It should be noted that the Fire Code Official is authorized to increase this dimension if the building is protected throughout with a fire sprinkler system. Consideration will be given for either providing fire sprinklers in smaller closets and small bathrooms OR adding corridor smoke detection. In the memo dated March 20th, 2015 from DLC Residential response #27 to a fire comment indicates that corridor smoke detection will be provided in both apartment buildings. WATER SUPPLY AND FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS This site has six proposed structures ranging from 6 to 11 stories above grade and several have underground parking. There is no indication of the proposed type of construction. Minnesota State Fire Code (MSFC) section 508 provides details on "Fire Protection Water Supplies" and appendix B and C detail "Fire-Flow Requirements for Buildings" and "Fire Hydrant Locations and Distribution". Based on assumptions on the type of construction and approximate square footages of the buildings, the MSFC requires a fire flow of approximately 6750 gallon per minute (gpm) to the site for any particular building. Assuming the buildings are protected with full NFPA 13 fire sprinkler systems, the MSFC allows the code official to reduce the required fire flow. For discussion purposes, it appears that the required fire flow could be reduced to 2000 gpm with an average spacing between fire hydrants of 450 feet. In reviewing the revised plans, it appears that the flow and hydrant spacing has been met. If the assumptions are incorrect, these calculations will need to be revised and this may require a higher water flow to the site and fire hydrants that are spaced closer together. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based on all of the revised information provided Staff recommends approval of the final PUD. If you have any questions, please contact me at 763-593-8065, or e-mail jcrelly@goldenvalleymn.gov Page 2 of 2 TRAVEL DEMAND MANAGEMENT PLAN The West End Redevelopment Central Park West St. Louis Park, MN Golden Valley, MN Prepared for: DLC Residential, LLC Central Park West, LLC Prepared by: Kimley))) Horn March 2015 LL k MAR 2 0 2015 L L INTRODUCTION This document serves as the Travel Demand Management (TDM) Plan for the Central Park West Site within the West End Redevelopment located in the southwest quadrant of 1-394 and TH 100 (Figure 1). As expressed in this document, DLC Residential is committed to applying this TDM Plan to the proposed residential, hotel, and office buildings. The cities of St. Louis Park and Golden Valley have established an overlay zoning district and a joint task force to address congestion mitigation strategies. The Task Force reviews Travel Demand Management (TDM) Plans for development in the established 1-394 overlay zoning district. The Central Park West West End Redevelopment site lies within Zone A of the overlay district(City of St. Louis Park Code, Article IV, Sections 36-321 through 36-330). PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Central Park West project consists of approximately 13.5 acres of new development on the site of previously razed office buildings. The Cities of Golden Valley and St. Louis Park each have jurisdiction within the site. The Central Park West Development will consist of a 199 unit apartment building, a 164 unit apartment building, an up to 150 room hotel, and up to 706,706 square feet of office space in two new office buildings. Construction of the first apartment building is anticipated to begin in spring 2015. Construction of the remaining residential, hotel, and office buildings will be phased with all construction anticipated to be completed by 2020. EXISTING CONDITIONS AND ALTERNATIVE TRANSIT OPPORTUNITIES Pedestrian and Bicycle The Central Park West development Site currently contains some sidewalk infrastructure along the south side of Wayzata Boulevard and the west side of Utica Avenue.The land on the proposed development is currently vacant and contains informal gravel lots off of unofficial curb cuts, old bituminous parking lots for the razed office buildings, and other vacant land. Utica Avenue and Wayzata Boulevard currently contain no dedicated bicycle infrastructure. However,the site is located a short distance from the Cedar Lake Trail, a bicycle and pedestrian pathway that runs from downtown Minneapolis to Chanhassen and other southwestern suburban communities.The Cedar Lake Trail carries a significant amount of commuter and recreational bicyclists. The Phase I area of the West End Development contains various pedestrian and bicycle amenities. Sidewalks were constructed along both sides of West 16th Street and West End Boulevard,as well as adjoining sidewalks to the grocer tenant and the main passageway from West End Boulevard to Park Place Boulevard. Some sidewalks are separated from the street by pervious green space,and others contain various urban design elements like potters, benches,street lighting,waste receptacles,and artistic bollards. Crosswalks are designated by various brick and stone material that differs from the bituminous roadway. Sidewalk space is lacking on Duke Drive east of the main shopping street.Although there is no designated bike lane infrastructure on the roadways, bike racks are located in front of the grocery tenant and near other retail tenants throughout the development. Bike racks and shower facilities are available at the Moneygram building and the 1600 Towers south of the development for tenants who bike to work. Transit The area is currently served by several bus routes operated by Metro Transit.The routes that serve the area are listed below: • Route 9:The route 9 bus serves the site along Park Place Boulevard and Wayzata Boulevard,and also has limited service along Highway 100.This local bus service connects to Cedar Lake Road and travels west to County Road 73. It also provides service into Golden Valley to the north and east of the TMP area, and moves into downtown Minneapolis. It continues through downtown and terminates in south Minneapolis at the 46th Street Blue Line LRT Station. Service is offered seven days a week all year. Buses on this route run from approximately 5:00 AM to 1:00 AM during the week.The route contains 15 to 20 minute headways during rush hour,30 minute headways midday and evenings, and 30 to 60 minute headways on the weekend. • Route 604:The route 604 bus runs west from the Park Place/1-394 Park& Ride lot near the Xenia-Park Place interchange down Wayzata Boulevard to the Louisiana Avenue Transit Center. It then continues south on Louisiana Avenue through St. Louis Park to Excelsior Boulevard, where it moves to and terminates at the Excelsior&Grand shopping district. Service is offered Monday through Friday during rush hour and midday periods, and runs from 7:30 AM to 4:30 PM.The route operates approximately once per hour during the service time. • Route 649:The route 649 bus loops along Wayzata Boulevard, Park Place Boulevard,Cedar Lake Road and Louisiana Avenue and provides limited-stop service along 1-394 into downtown Minneapolis.Service is offered Monday through Friday during rush hour periods. It operates from approximately 6:15 AM to 8:30 AM, and from 3:30 PM to 6:3013M.The route operates every 30 minutes during the service time. To encourage residents and visitors to utilize transit, expansion of existing routes—such as offering the 649 route every day during the week—should occur to serve the site. Adding new routes that run directly from the West End into downtown Minneapolis would also help facilitate higher transit ridership to and from the development. Surrounding Amenities The Central Park West development Site is across the street from The Shops at West End,which contain various types of restaurants, a movie theater,a Cub Foods grocery store, and other retail outlets.The site is also within walking distance to several other stores and restaurants across Park Place Boulevard, as well as an Olive Garden restaurant at the corner of Wayzata Boulevard and Utica Avenue. In addition, the existing Moneygram building has a fitness center facility complete with showers and locker rooms that is available to employees in the Moneygram and 1600 Tower buildings. The site is also near newly finished and currently under construction apartment buildings north of 16' Street,as well as a Hilton-based Homewood Suites hotel. IMPLEMENTATION OF REQUIRED ROAD IMPROVEMENTS A number of roadway improvements were required by the AUAR and traffic study completed for the Central Park West development.The approved project site plan resulted in a refinement of the improvements needed and these are outlined in the developer's agreement between the City of St. Louis Park,the City of Golden Valley, and DLC Residential.The majority of the required improvements will be constructed between 2015 and 2020.As a result of these improvements being implemented,the intersections in and around the project are expected to operate at acceptable(LOS D or better) levels of service with the redevelopment. Planned Road Improvements Utica Avenue: • Reconstruct existing section of Utica Avenue between Wayzata Boulevard and the Moneygram building entrance. Build four total vehicular lanes with a center grassy median separating northbound and southbound traffic. • Construct a privately owned but publically accessible linear park past 16th Street that will assist pedestrians and bicyclists to access the various buildings. These road and park improvements will be designed and constructed by DLC Residential. Planned Trail and Sidewalk Improvements In addition to road improvements a number of sidewalks will be added for pedestrian and bicycle mobility.The developer has agreed to: • Construct improvements to the sidewalk on the south side of Wayzata Boulevard. • Construct the linear park and fund all urban design elements within its grounds, including decorative lighting, benches,trash receptacles,and general open space that will be accessible to the public. GOAL AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES The overall goal of this plan is to reduce potential traffic congestion that will come with the proposed development.This will occur by maintaining or improving acceptable levels of service on the roadways within and adjacent to the project site, minimizing the projected number of trips through adjacent intersections during the PM peak hour, and continuously encouraging alternative transportation use within each component in the development.The general road improvements mixed with pedestrian amenities, bicycle infrastructure, and better transit service will all assist in achieving the goal. PROPOSED TMP STRATEGIES DLC Residential in coordination with building managers will pursue the following objectives and strategies to achieve its Traffic Management Plan. Objectives and Strategies TDM Friendly Design • Mixed Use Development:A hotel and residential component have been proposed for the subjected site in phase one, and the proposed office space will be constructed in a future phase. The hotel and residential uses will help overall traffic flow because the two uses have traditionally different traffic flow peak times during the day.The Shops at West End will also encourage residents and hotel guests alike to stay nearby for shopping,entertainment,and grocery needs.This will reduce the number of vehicular trips that leave the site in the PM peak hour. Commuters to the office buildings in the future will counter traffic flows from residents, thus decreasing the likelihood of concentrated roadway congestion. • Residential Component: In the 1-394 Overlay Zoning District language for both St. Louis Park and Golden Valley, it is encouraged to develop residential uses within the corridor to reduce PM peak traffic volumes in one direction.This development includes two separate 6-story apartment buildings containing 363 dwelling units. Residents in these units will likely either be reverse commuting from areas other than the West End vicinity in the afternoon, or will be working in the nearby office buildings,thus helping reduce PM traffic congestion. • Shared ParkinE.A mixed-use development of this type provides opportunities for shared parking among different uses, reducing the overall number of parking spaces needed on-site.The fully built out pedestrian infrastructure within the site will help site users access shops, hotels, and residences by walking instead of driving.A parking structure in the east side of the property will help alleviate office parking concerns and spillover,and will improve direct traffic flow into the development. • Designated Hotel Guest Parking: Hotel employees will be incited to park in areas that won't create parking lot bottlenecks, and will be encouraged to seek alternative commuting methods like biking,walking,or taking transit.This will allow the hotel to hold sufficient parking spaces for its guests,thus reducing internal vehicular trips (guests driving around to find a more convenient parking space). The hotel lot will also have specific signage that will discourage non- guests from parking in that area. • Underground Residential Parking:The development plan calls for underground parking for residents in the apartment buildings, thus reducing parking conflicts in surrounding hotel and office parking areas. • Delivery Truck Reductions: Deliveries via truck will be minimized due to the general lack of need for shipments to the residential buildings. Delivery Trucks will be restricted to deliver between 10 pm and 8 am.Trucks needed for any use on the site will enter at the curb cut near the corner of Wayzata Boulevard and Lilac Lane. Garbage collection will be carefully scheduled during the day to minimize impacts on residents and public. • Pedestrian Access:Sidewalks will be provided on both sides of Utica Avenue and on the south side of Wayzata Boulevard. Sidewalks within the site include the multi-use"woonerf'space and paved areas in the linear park.All sidewalks will have safe crossings at Utica Avenue so residents, hotel guests, and hotel workers can walk to nearby shops and restaurants instead of drive. • Bicycle Access:Wayfinding signs will direct bicycle riders to ride south to the Cedar Lake Trail. Bicycles will also be allowed within the "woonerf"and linear park space. Bicycle parking will be included within Central Park West near both residential buildings and the hotel building. St. Louis Park requires that bicycle parking spaces equal 10%of total vehicle parking spaces. Approximately 477 bicycle spaces are planned to be placed within the site. Approximately 212 bicycle spaces will be installed the Phase 1 and 2 Residential Buildings,with the remaining 265 spaces installed for the Office.Additional required spaces can be provided if a need is identified. Participate with Regional TDM Organizations to Provide Information on Transportation Alternatives • Create an office Commuter Benefits Coordinator(CBC) position to coordinate with Metro Transit and officials from trail network entities. • Inform residential concierge workers about transportation alternatives,who will then be able to notify residents about transit, biking,and walking options. Have concierge set up special commuter challenges at certain times of the year to encourage residents to try non-vehicular commutes. • Inform hotel concierge workers about surrounding transportation amenities,who will then be able to advise guests to walk—instead of drive—to entertainment. • Display transit and trail maps in locations within both residential buildings,the hotel, and future office buildings. Support and Promote Bicycling and Walking as Alternatives • Build and maintain pedestrian-friendly space within and alongside development site. • Prioritize pedestrian movements over automobile movements at intersections by designating crosswalks with different paving material and building pedestrian warning lights. • Place bike wayfinding signs along Utica Avenue and within the linear park that direct bicyclists to the Cedar Lake Trail. • Actively display updated biking information,such as commuting tips and trail maps, in the lobbies of each building. • Add a fitness center and showers into one of the office buildings during the next development phase.These amenities will be accessible to employees who wish to walk or bike to work. Support and Promote Transit as an Alternative • Encourage Metro Transit to increase frequency of existing service or add new direct service into downtown Minneapolis from turnaround area. • Concierges in the apartment buildings and the hotel will facilitate the sale of bus passes to residents,and will provide detailed transit information to guests.The CBC will encourage office tenants to use alternative commuting methods, and will sell bus passes to employees. Support and Promote Carpooling and Vanpooling • Have apartment concierge send surveys to residents to see if a potential carpool pairing would be possible. • Distribute carpool and vanpool service information to residents. • Look into viability to add parking spaces for rideshare services, such as ZipCar or HourCar. • Rideshare parking spaces may be either added or designated. Monitoring • Once apartment units are 75%occupied, send survey to residents to gather interest and supply information about alternative transportation. • Have apartment concierge send periodic, bi-annual surveys to residents to discover transportation usage data. • Evaluate effectiveness of strategies and modify the plan accordingly. TDM IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Developer(s)will be responsible to implement this plan upon completion of the Central Park West development.These obligations will run with the land in the event that portions of the project are sold to third parties.The steps to plan implementation are outlined below: 1) Apartment and hotel concierge employees will be trained to serve as transportation coordinators and to follow plan implementation.These persons will coordinate with each other and with the Commuter Benefits Coordinator(CBC) in the future office buildings. 2) Once the hotel is operational and the apartment buildings are 75%occupied, the concierges will conduct a commuter survey to estimate participation in alternative modes of transportation. 3) The concierges will work with Metro Transit to inform all tenants regarding all alternative transportation options available to them for commuting. 4) The concierges will continuously encourage guests and residents to utilize and walk to the nearby entertainment,shopping, dining, and grocery tenants instead of drive to others. 5) The City of St. Louis Park is completing an updated traffic study of the area with the implemented road improvements.The City of Golden Valley has not committed to completing this study at this time. Once the St. Louis Park updated traffic study is completed, DLC Residential, building concierges,and the CBC will meet with staff from the City of St. Louis Park and the City of Golden Valley to determine if traffic is operating at acceptable levels. TRAVEL MANAGEMENT MEASURE STATUS TARGET DATE TDM Friendly Design Mixed Use Development—establish uses 2020 with separate peak traffic flows Residential Component—build 2018 apartments nearby to lessen PM traffic Shared parking—between hotel and 2018 residential uses Hotel guest parking—ease of access for 2018 guests Underground apartment parking—ease 2018 of access for residents Delivery truck restrictions—innate lack of 2017 need for delivery services& restricted delivery times Pedestrian Access—establish good 2017 sidewalk connections Bicycle Access—establish good biking 2017 infrastructure TDM Organization Collaboration Create CBC position for office buildings 2020 Train residential concierges 2017 Train hotel concierges 2018 Display non-vehicular transportation 2017 information Incentivize residents to commute using 2017 alternative transportation Promote Walking&Biking Build and maintain good pedestrian 2017 spaces Create designated biking infrastructure 2017 Place wayfinding signs for bicyclists 2017 Actively update walking&biking 2017 information within building lobbies Promote Transit Use Encourage Metro Transit to extend 2017 service or add new service to area Have concierges facilitate selling bus 2017 passes to residents,and providing information to hotel guests. Promote Car/Vanpooling 017 Have concierges pair residents for 2 potential carpool arrangements ---7TRAVEL MANAGEMENT MEASURE STATUS TARGET DATE Distribute carpool &vanpool information 2017 to residents Look into viability for rideshare service 2017 implementation Look into adding or designating rideshare 2017 parking spaces Monitoring Send commuting survey to residents 2018 once apartment is 75%occupied and hotel is open Send occasional commuting surveys 2017 (twice a year)to residents to gather commuting trends Evaluate effectiveness of strategies and 2020 modify plan in coordination with concierges,CBC, and officials from the Cities of St. Louis Park and Golden Valley Kimley F>> Horn Date: February 9, 2015 To: Emily Goellner, City of Golden Valley From: John Crawford, PE, PTOE, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. (612-294-7264) Subject: West End AUAR Analysis Update—Response to City of Golden Valley Letter(dated December 26, 2014) PURPOSE OF MEMO Kimley-Horn previously provided an analysis update to the West End AUAR, dated October 30, 2014. As part of the review process, the City of Golden Valley requested additional traffic studies to be conducted to update the information based on current traffic volumes. The City of Golden Valley's requests included counting existing traffic volumes, evaluating the build-out conditions traffic operations, along with a discussion on traffic calming, and providing support to Golden Valley staff for a neighborhood meeting. This memo summarizes results of the updated p.m. peak-hour traffic analyses for the purposes of responding to the City of Golden Valley's requests. This analysis maintains the proposed land uses evaluated as part of the analysis update submitted on October 30, 2014. Results of the analyses were compared to the thresholds established in the 2007 AUAR and 2013 AUAR Update to ensure the proposed development is in conformance with the AUAR and would not incur additional impacts or require additional mitigation measures. PROJECT INFORMATION The original AUAR was approved in 2007 and studied multiple scenarios with varying levels and types of development, but Scenario 1 most closely represents the actual plans for the West End development and has been consistently used as a comparison in other analyses. The land uses and intensities evaluated for Scenario 1 included: 2007 AUAR Scenario 1 • 1.0 million square feet(SF)of office space • 400,000 SF of retail space • 250 condo units Pursuant to Minnesota Rules 4410.3610 Subp. 7, an AUAR and plan for mitigation must be revised every five years until all development in the study area has received final approval. Since the study area has not been fully developed, an update to the West End AUAR was completed in October 2013. The 2013 update evaluated two additional scenarios, which included: 2013 AUAR Update Scenario 1A • 1.1 million SF of office space • 346,674 SF of retail space • 454 apartment units Kimley�))Hary Page 2 2013 AUAR Update Scenario 1 B • 1.1 million SF of office space • 346,674 SF of retail space s 704 apartment units As of August 2014, the existing, built development is comprised of 35,396 SF of 2"d story office space, 346,674 SF of retail space, and 453 apartment units. In October 2014, an analysis was undertaken to update the AUAR to incorporate a revised development plan for the West End Development. The revised plan proposed to reduce the amount of office space, remove two existing restaurants, increase the amount of apartment units, and add hotel rooms. The proposed plan includes a range of development for the remaining office space (578,000 SF to 706,706 SF)and apartment units (up to 400 units), and the new hotel (150 to 200 rooms). For the purpose of the October 2014 analysis and this analysis, the total West End Development was assumed to consist of the higher end of the proposed ranges of development and included: October 2014 AUAR Update Revised Scenario 1A • 742,102 square feet(SF)of office space • 346,674 SF of retail space • 853 apartment units • 200 hotel rooms Project Trip Generation The trip generation potential of the West End Development was updated based on the revised development plan documented in the October 2014 AUAR Update. As shown in Table 1, the revised development plan is expected to generate a total of 2,536 two-way, p.m. peak-hour trips (1,050 entering and 1,486 exiting). The revised trip generation indicates a slight increase in the amount of two-way trips for the a.m. peak hour and a slight decrease in the amount of two-way trips for the p.m. peak hour, as compared to the approved 2007 AUAR Scenario 1. After removing the existing, built development, the trip generation potential for the remaining, un-built development was calculated to be 1,085 two-way p.m. peak-hour trips (324 entering and 761 exiting). For the purposes of this analysis, these trips were distributed onto the roadway system and evaluated at the study area locations. A summary of the remaining trip generation is provided in Table 2 below. `R ,[mley ', 1a o 1 rry f Page 3 Table 1 —Total Project Trip Generation Summary' Revised Scenario 1 A Total Land Use Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Land Use Size Trips p In Out In Out Office 742,102 square feet 5,606 788 108 151 738 Retail (2 Restaurants Removed) 346,674 square feet 14,863 218 139 624 676 Condos 0 units 0 0 0 0 0 Apartments 853 units 5,672 85 341 331 178 Hotels 200 rooms 1,634 63 43 61 59 Trip Generation Subtotal 27,775 1,154 631 1,167 1,651 Multi-Use Reduction (-10%) -2,778 -115 -63 -117 -165 TOTAL 24,997 1,039 568 1,050 1,486 Percent Change from approved 5% -12% 61% 16% -9% 2007 AUAR Scenario 1 AUAR Trip Generation Limits 1,320 528 1,167 1,883 'Trip generation calculations as documented in the 2007 West End AUAR, based on ITE Trip Generation, 7h Edition(2003). Current trip generation calculations based on the most recent version of ITE Trip Generation, 9'h Edition(2012). Table 2—Remaining Project Trip Generation Summary' Revised Scenario 1A Remaining Land Use Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Land Use Size Trips p In Out In Out Office 706,706 square feet 5,339 751 102 144 703 Retail (2 Restaurants Removed) 0 square feet 0 0 0 0 0 Condos 0 units 0 0 0 0 0 Apartments 400 units 2,660 40 160 155 84 Hotels 200 rooms 1,634 1 63 43 61 59 Trip Generation Subtotal 9,633 854 305 360 1 846 Multi-Use Reduction (-10%) -963 -85 -31 -36 -85 TOTAL 8,670 769 274 324 761 'Trip generation calculations as documented in the 2007 West End AUAR, based on ITE Trip Generation, 7"Edition(2003). Current trip generation calculations based on the most recent version of ITE Trip Generation, 91'Edition(2012). Project Trip Distribution The trip distribution of the remaining West End Development project trips was based upon the distribution documented in the previous AUAR traffic studies. For the purpose of this analysis, and to kimley-horn.com Kit 1 ley')) HOt i ! Page 4 provide a conservative analysis, the assignment of project trips was modified slightly to include an additional five percent(5%) of remaining project trips traversing to and from the east along 1-394 via Wayzata Boulevard. The result of this modification increased the amount of project trips on Wayzata Boulevard from 10%to 15%. In addition, five percent (5%)of project traffic was assumed to traverse to and from the south along Quentin Avenue. Figure 4 shows the larger project area to demonstrate the changes made to this distribution. The result of this modification increased the amount of project trips on Quentin Avenue from 0%to 5%. Figure 1 illustrates the local area project trip distribution. DATA COLLECTION Existing Conditions Wayzata Boulevard is a frontage road serving 1-394 and functions as a minor collector roadway in the City of Golden Valley Transportation Plan. Wayzata Boulevard is a two-lane, undivided roadway through the City of Golden Valley. The posted speed limit for the section of Wayzata Boulevard passing beneath the TH100 overpass is 30 mph. The section of Wayzata Boulevard that continues north and east of the intersection of Wayzata Boulevard &Quentin Avenue, as well as Quentin Avenue to the south, both have posted speed limits of 35 mph. Traffic Count Data Turning movement counts were performed at the study intersections of Wayzata Boulevard & Quentin Avenue, Wayzata Boulevard & France Avenue West, and Wayzata Boulevard & France Avenue East during the p.m. peak period (4:00 PM to 6:00 PM)on January 6, 2015. In addition, a 24-hour traffic count was performed at the intersection of Wayzata Boulevard &Quentin Avenue on January 13, 2015. Figure 3 illustrates the p.m. peak-hour traffic volumes and Figure 4 illustrates the average daily traffic(ADT)volumes. Both figures are provided as attachments to this letter. Speed Data Existing speed data was collected as part of the Wayzata Boulevard South Frontage Road —Traffic Volume and Speed study, dated December 11, 2006. As previously discussed, the section of Wayzata Boulevard between Quentin Avenue and France Avenue has a posted speed limit of 35 mph. The 85th percentile speed (a speed at which 85% of traffic are traveling equal to or less than) is generally used as an indicator of the appropriate speed limit. The results of the speed study indicate that the 85th percentile speed along Wayzata Boulevard between Quentin Avenue and France Avenue is between 1 mph less and 6 mph more than the posted speed limit of 35 mph, with the average 85th percentile speed equal to 39 mph. Intersection Sight Distance Existing intersection sight distance was reviewed at the cross-street intersections along Wayzata Boulevard based on aerial photography and a field visit. Based on this review, there are several intersections which appear to have existing obstructions limiting the sight distance of motorists. Pictures taken at each of the study locations are provided as an attachment to this letter. Klmle `')) Horn Page 5 ANALYSIS SUMMARY Existing (2015) Conditions Traffic Analysis The existing conditions intersection analysis was based upon methodologies defined by the Highway Capacity Manual(HCM 2010)for unsignalized intersections. The analysis was performed utilizing the most recent version of the Highway Capacity Software (HCS 2010). Existing p.m. peak-hour traffic volumes and study area intersection geometrics are illustrated in Figure 3. Each of the study area intersections is currently unsignalized, with side-street STOP control. The intersection operations analysis was conducted for the existing p.m. peak-hour to determine how the study area intersections currently operate under existing traffic conditions. The results of the analysis are shown in Table 3 and indicate that the eastbound approach of the Wayzata Boulevard &Quentin Avenue intersection is currently operating below an acceptable LOS. Documentation of the intersection analysis is provided as an attachment to this letter. Table 3 Existing (2015) Conditions Intersection Analysis Summary Intersection LOS* Wayzata Boulevard & Quentin Avenue E Wayzata Boulevard & France Avenue West C Wayzata Boulevard & France Avenue East C *The HCM does not provide an overall LOS for unsignalized intersections. The LOS represents the worst side-street approach LOS. Background (2016) Conditions Traffic Analysis The background (non-project)traffic growth rate percentage of 0.5% utilized in the 2007 West End AUAR was utilized in this analysis. This growth rate was applied to the existing volumes at the study area intersections to estimate background traffic volumes for year 2016, which are illustrated in Figure 3. The background conditions intersection analysis utilized a methodology similar to the existing conditions analysis. The results of the analysis are shown in Table 4 and indicate that the eastbound approach of the Wayzata Boulevard & Quentin Avenue intersection is expected to operate below an acceptable LOS for background (2016)traffic conditions. Documentation of the intersection analysis is provided as an attachment to this letter. Table 4 Background (2016) Conditions Intersection Analysis Summary Intersection LOS* Wayzata Boulevard & Quentin Avenue E Wayzata Boulevard & France Avenue West C Wayzata Boulevard & France Avenue East C *The HCM does not provide an overall LOS for unsignalized intersections. The LOS represents the worst side-street approach LOS. 2 550 University Avenue •• • mley.�>)Horn Page Future Total (2016) Conditions Traffic Analysis The remaining project traffic(from Table 2)was distributed onto the study area network and added to the background traffic to produce the future total traffic volumes, which are illustrated in Figure 3. The future total conditions intersection analysis utilized a methodology similar to the background conditions analysis. The results of the analysis are shown in Table 5 and indicate that the intersection of Wayzata Boulevard &Quentin Avenue will require turn-lane improvements to be constructed for the intersection to operate at an acceptable LOS. The required turn-lane improvements consist of the addition of an exclusive southbound right-turn lane(resulting in one southbound through lane, and one southbound right-turn lane) and the addition of an exclusive eastbound right-turn lane (resulting in one eastbound through lane, and one eastbound right-turn lane). Documentation of the intersection analysis is provided as an attachment to this letter. Table 5 Future Total (2016) Conditions Intersection Analysis Summary Intersection LOS* Wayzata Boulevard & Quentin Avenue F/D Wayzata Boulevard & France Avenue West C Wayzata Boulevard & France Avenue East D *The HCM does not provide an overall LOS for unsignalized intersections. The LOS represents the worst side-street approach LOS. LOS/LOS—indicates the LOS before and after improvement A supplemental analysis was performed to determine the operational impacts of installing a multi-way stop at the intersection of Wayzata Boulevard & Quentin Avenue. The result of this analysis indicates that the intersection would operate at an overall acceptable LOS with the addition of an exclusive eastbound right-turn lane (resulting in one eastbound through lane, and one eastbound right-turn lane) and the installation of multi-way stop control. The construction of an exclusive southbound right- turn is not needed based on this analysis. Comparison to 2007 Traffic Study Figure 11 of the 2007 traffic study has been included for comparison purposes. The updated traffic counts and project-related trip generation reveal that at the intersection of Wayzata Boulevard and Quentin Avenue, the 2016 Full Build total intersection approach volume will be lower than was projected for the 2010 Full Build total intersection approach volume in the 2007 study. Preliminary Signal Warrant Analysis A preliminary signal warrant analysis, based on the traffic volume criteria of the Minnesota (MN) MUTCD (December 2011), was conducted at the intersection of Wayzata Boulevard &Quentin Avenue. The intersection is currently stop controlled on the west leg (Wayzata Boulevard) and free flow on the north leg (Wayzata Boulevard)and south leg (Quentin Avenue). The posted speed limit on the north and south legs (major street) of the intersection is 35 mph and on the west leg (minor street) is 30 mph. All intersection approaches are single lane, with no exclusive turn lanes. < 2550 •li�iii`I� imle f',, Horn Fuge For the purposes of this analysis, Warrant 1 —Eight-Hour Vehicular Volume and Warrant 2—Four- Hour Vehicular Volume were evaluated. Based on a review of the traffic count data collected on January 13, 2015, zero (0) hours meet the Warrant 1 volume criteria and 1 hour meets the Warrant 2 volume criteria. Therefore, a traffic signal is not warranted at this location. A summary of the preliminary signal warrant analysis is provided as an attachment to this letter. Multi-Way Stop Control Warrant Analysis A multi-way stop control warrant analysis was conducted based on criteria of the MN MUTCD (December 2011), which identifies safety and volume criteria that should be considered to determine the need for the installation of a multi-way STOP sign. The criteria include: • Five or more reported crashes in a 12-month period that are susceptible to correction by a multi-way stop installation. Such crashes include right-turn and left-turn collisions as well as right-angle collisions. • Minimum Volumes: • The vehicular volume entering the intersection from the major street approaches (total of both approaches)averages at least 300 vehicles per hour for any 8 hours of an average day; and • The combined vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle volume entering the intersection from the minor street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 200 units per hour for the same 8 hours, with an average delay to minor-street vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle during the highest hour; but • If the 85th-percentile approach speed of the major-street traffic exceeds 40 mph, the minimum vehicular volume warrants are 70 percent of the values provided above. Additionally, a multi-way stop may be considered if no single criterion is satisfied, but where the criterion above (excluding the 85th-percentile approach speed)are all satisfied to 80 percent of the minimum values. A review of the crash data from MnCMAT indicates that during the previous 10 years(2004 to 2014), there were two (2)crashes at the Wayzata Boulevard &Quentin Avenue intersection. Neither crash was associated with a fatality or injury; both crashes involved property damage only. A review of the traffic volume data collected on January 13, 2015, indicates that 3 hours out of the required eight (8) hours meet the volume warrant criteria for a multi-way stop. As previously discussed, the average 85th percentile speed is less than 40 mph. The results of the analysis indicate that a multi-way stop is not warranted at this location based on the crash history and existing volume data, which is consistent with the Intersection Control Evaluation prepared by SEH for MnDOT on February 11, 2010. A summary of the multi-way stop evaluation is provided as an attachment to this letter. Comparison of 2007 and 2015 Results As indicated above, the results of the analyses indicate the need for the following mitigation: Kimp �^ ey' 1 u 101 n Page 8 • Wayzata Boulevard & Quentin Avenue • Install a southbound right-turn lane. • Install an eastbound right-turn lane. These mitigation measures at the intersection of Wayzata Boulevard &Quentin Avenue are consistent with the mitigation measures identified in the 2007 AUAR prepared by SRF. A complete list of the improvements documented in the 2007 AUAR, and whether the improvement is complete or not, is provided below: • Park Place Boulevard/1-394 North Ramp • Install a westbound right-turn lane to provide a dual right-turn lane. In addition, modify the signal phasing to provide a right-turn overlap phase and optimize timing. Not Complete. • Park Place Boulevard/1-394 South Ramp • Install an eastbound right-turn lane to provide a dual right-turn lane. In addition, modify the signal phasing to provide a right-turn overlap phase. Not Complete. • Install a northbound right-turn lane to provide a dual right-turn lane. Not Complete. In addition, extend the northbound right-turn lane to Wayzata Boulevard and modify phasing to provide a right-turn overlap phase and optimize timing. Completed. • Widen the entrance ramp onto eastbound 1-394 to maintain a two-lane entrance onto the collector-distributor roadway. Not Complete. • Park Place Boulevard/Wayzata Boulevard • Install a southbound left-turn lane to provide dual left-turn lanes. In addition, widen eastbound Wayzata Boulevard to accommodate the dual left-turn lane. Completed. • Install a westbound right-turn lane to provide a dual right-turn lane. In addition, modify the signal phasing to provide a right-turn overlap phase and optimize timing. Completed. • Install an additional northbound through lane beginning at north of Wayzata Boulevard and ending at the 1-394 South Ramp. Completed. • Install an additional northbound through lane beginning at West 16th Street, connecting to the through lane recommended at Wayzata Boulevard. Completed. • Install an exclusive northbound right-turn lane. (Note that this improvement was only for Scenarios 2 and 4 of the AUAR) NA. • Park Place Boulevard/West 16th Street • Extend the existing southbound left-turn lane to provide 300 feet of storage. Completed. • Modify the existing northbound shared through/right-turn lane to a through lane only. Completed. • Install a northbound right-turn lane. Completed. kimley-horn.corn2550 University Avenue West. Suite 238N, St. Paul, MN 55114 r. .f m lpp ey`)) Hofr1„! Page 9 • Modify the westbound approach to provide dual left-turn lanes, one through lane and a right-turn lane. In addition, modify the signal phasing to provide a right-turn overlap phase. Completed. • Modify the eastbound shared through/left-turn lane to an exclusive left-turn lane to provide dual left-turn lanes. Completed. • Modify the existing exclusive eastbound right-turn lane to provide a shared through/right- turn lane. Completed. • Eliminate the current split phasing and optimize the signal timing. Completed. • Park Place Boulevard/Gamble Drive • Modify the existing westbound shared through/left-turn lane to an exclusive left-turn lane to provide dual left-turn lanes. Completed. • Convert the existing westbound right-turn lane to a through lane and install an exclusive right-turn lane on this approach. In addition, modify the signal phasing to provide a right- turn overlap phase. Completed. • Eliminate the current split phasing and optimize the signal timing. Completed. • Quentin Avenue/Wayzata Boulevard • Install a southbound right-turn lane. Not Complete. • Install an eastbound right-turn lane. Not Complete. • Quentin Avenue/Old Cedar Lake Road • Install a northbound left-turn lane. Not Complete. • Modify the current striping to provide a southbound right-turn lane. Not Complete. • TH 100 East Frontage Road/Old Cedar Lake Road • Modify and widen the westbound approach and re-stripe as two lanes. Not Complete. • Widen the west end of the concrete island to create a 90-degree T-intersection. Not Complete. TRAFFIC CALMING AND SAFETY MEASURES A study to evaluate traffic calming improvements along Wayzata Boulevard between TH 100 and France Avenue was conducted by SRF on July 12, 2007. The purpose of the study was to address existing vehicle speeds, limited sight distance, and pedestrian concerns along Wayzata Boulevard. In addition, a Traffic Safety Improvements study was conducted by SEH for Wayzata Boulevard in October 2007. Several of the traffic calming strategies recommended as part of the Traffic Safety Improvements study were utilized by the City of Golden Valley to apply for grant funding in February 2008. •• •. • .i ey `) 1 i o 1 1 i Page 10 Mitigation measures to alleviate the existing vehicle speed, limited sight distance, and pedestrian safety issues were previously identified as part of the Wayzata Boulevard Traffic Calming Options study, dated July 12, 2007, and the Wayzata Boulevard Traffic Safety Improvements study, dated October 2007. The recommendations proposed as part of that study include: • Brush Trimming • All-Way Stop Control • Curb Extensions and Narrower Traffic Lanes • Intersection Redesign and Pavement Markings As discussed in the Data Collection section of this memo, limited sight distance exists at several of the cross-street intersections along Wayzata Boulevard. The recommended traffic safety improvements identified above should continue to be pursued by the City of Golden Valley to alleviate these existing safety issues. To date, only one of the recommended improvements has been constructed -the curb extension at the pedestrian bridge. A review of the crash data from MnCMAT indicates that during the previous 10 years (2004 to 2014), there were two (2) crashes at the Wayzata Boulevard &Quentin Avenue intersection. Neither crash was associated with a fatality or injury; both crashes involved property damage only. SUMMARY Analysis Results: The results of the traffic operations analysis indicate that the intersection of Wayzata Boulevard & Quentin Avenue will require turn-lane improvements to be constructed for the intersection to operate at an acceptable LOS. The required turn-lane improvements consist of an exclusive southbound right-turn lane and an exclusive eastbound right-turn lane. A supplemental analysis was performed to determine the operational impacts of installing a multi-way stop at the intersection of Wayzata Boulevard & Quentin Avenue. The result of this analysis indicates that the intersection would operate at an overall acceptable LOS with the construction of an exclusive eastbound right-turn lane and the installation of multi-way stop control. The construction of an exclusive southbound right-turn is not needed based on this analysis. In addition to the traffic operations analysis, a signal warrant analysis and a multi-way stop analysis were performed to determine the need for a traffic signal or a multi-way stop. The results of the analyses indicate that neither a traffic signal nor multi-way stop is warranted at the intersection of Wayzata Boulevard & Quentin Avenue at this time. Traffic Calming and Safety: Mitigation measures to alleviate the existing vehicle speed, limited sight distance, and pedestrian safety issues were previously identified as part of the Wayzata Boulevard Traffic Calming Options study, dated July 12, 2007, and the Wayzata Boulevard Traffic Safety Improvements study, dated October 2007. As discussed in the Data Collection section of this memo, limited sight distance exists at several of the cross-street intersections along Wayzata Boulevard. The recommended traffic safety improvements identified above should continue to be pursued by the City of Golden Valley to alleviate these existing safety issues. In addition, MnCMAT data during the imle ))) Horn Fra e i previous ten years (2004 to 2014) indicates two (2) crashes at the intersection of Wayzata Boulevard & Quentin Avenue. ATTACHMENTS N '0 N O .Q ;7 N O IL y N ._ (.5 w O U N — rc a) c V', Ln o o 1" i O O N N 'Sany e7lin — � i m r \ o J Ln Cl N N O O N — C O a) E ,.... cn cn O Ocu U O i w U LL _CC .�� .0 oDcnY X x i — - N Legend Study Roadway © Study Intersection tXX% Entering Distribution N (XX%)Exiting Distribution `cc > NOT TO SCALE N ld 3 M L H 15.0% 4- Wayzata Boulevard r ,j j 4 r Driveway (15.0%) y h (15.0%) i 3 w c c a a c c u_ u. Wayzata Boulevard i (15.0%) s h 1 (5.0%) i o >= d dd 3 Q Figure 2 Project Trip Distribution Kimley>>>Horn West End Development 02015 Hennepin County, Minnesota co co 5 N (TO E O N 3 a,2 Q- (L) j LL � O C 0 U > N C) > � � C v v v C O W � U O N L o (0) <o> > Q H 9£l (9£L) <9£L> > N C O ! 4 r o£ (0£) <oc> N p _ g pJenaino0- e;ez�(eM £s �1 1 f 3 j anuany a�ue� <Zt> (ZO Zl .0 N O <£6U (bbl) £bl L Z (Z) Z> 4 r 96 (56) <S6> i f M anuany aOueJ=l > v m 3 0 In m .r N N T �94l (L4l) <Lbl> r 09 (09) <9t> a oanuany m'Z— a�o ss> css) b9 �1 f uquent) 3 VvL> (56) S6 7 r (6 Cm O` O 10 N T>,.c m> T> v v a Y (D 7 w w X@ o 0 �r (n(n W m 1- m v v � V C © X n d J X X w V/ J �z N 0 OIle � O Legend — Study Roadway 0 Study Intersection XX Existing Volume N (XX) Background Volume <XX> Total Volume Y m NOT TO SCALE R 0 M L 4• 4- Wayzata Boulevard r 4 j 4 r Driveway -► h f' s h 1 f' Z � Z W d N � 7 C C d a' a d U C LL LL Wayzata Boulevard j 3,580 <1,900> (1,250) 1,240 J h t (3,600) <1,150> (930) 920 <5,340> C 7 C C 7 Q C Figure 4 Daily Traffic Volumes Kim LY,>>>Horn West End Development Hennepin County, Minnesota 02015 Hl V 0 10 (5) 'n 4-120(70) g d LO �L �► ,�340(555) �V ca 0 150(115) � � (5) 5 `�L > i 155(105) 35� 4 V U _ (95) o LOin U C (315) 45 (240)195 N co O m N N (245)120 CD n 7 Q � = ui N31 �- �- (13 Z c 22o0 z W „ SSd d 44 v 3. v 3Nlf W X X • (85) 95 I J X X (545)570 M N 95 o ^ � u�i � c y LO t- 2� 4F 4 160(140) 0 Q Q Z c S ONdD121Hd W C) CO 4 465(930) ON\ Q 0 ' .J1 �� r- 30 (65) MVId bj U Q S O 3nV rv, Z3H 1VN N r- (260)385 \ --c V --► VM OLo 0 (740)770 o O U') 3AV o N co 825(635) LL ( ) 455 290 M \\ 375( 260)) Q o Ln o ` � N013ON dC,j \ v �- o� -X '3nV rK O Z =w � Y N Q S2 o W cn In t- o 90 (125) a J Z 790(1800) •S '3nV VOIl(1 0 cc N Lu Z Q Y o T M L140(95) V (425) 615 J N `" X405(340) W w X18 411 r 140(205) a (1325)1340� � z g g LLJ 3OV1d)idVd (740)190 1 1 C4 a0 (205)135----1, ov rn � O (405)90 -� 0o o > v M Q W W w VIN3X C11 F Y P� �n CU d 3 GAO 8�� N cn cn o J - CQ a- 650 560 AAV 4 Qo 450(1225) �-' 395(165) Z o oro v io ( ) _o LO U') ♦_450(390) N Z _ CO LO m ♦-490(1105) II 155(220) U 215(660) 4 14� (1115)535 �; (665) 1601 I�r*(* (290)485 (1255)1325 M m NO (715)290-0 or ' CO N N (435)150 - ui vi (105) 90 v v `�' w m v M v o c and �� VOLUME DEVELOPMENT WORKSHEETS TRAFFIC VOLUMES AT STUDY INTERSECTION INTERSECTION: Wayzata Blvd&Quentin Ave COUNT DATE: January 6,2015 TIME PERIOD: 4:45 p.m.-5:45 p.m. PEAK HOUR FACTOR: 0.91 "EXISTING TRAFFIC" EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Raw Turning Movements 269 192 1 1 60 146 154 95 Peak Season Correction Factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 EXISTING CONDITIONS 269 192 60 146 154 ss 'BACKGROUND TRAFFIC' EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR TOTAL"VESTED"TRAFFIC 0 0 0 0 0 0 Years To Buildout 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Yearly Growth Rate 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% BACKGROUND TRAFFIC GROWTH 1 1 0 1 1 0 NON-PROJECT TRAFFIC 270 193 60 147 155 95 "PROJECT TRAFFIC" LAND USE TYPE EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Project Pass-B Trips Net New 114 38 16 1 1 49 TOTAL PROJECT TRAFFIC 114 38 16 1 0 0 1 49 TOTAL TRAFFIC 384 231 76 1 147 155 144 TRAFFIC VOLUMES AT STUDY INTERSECTION INTERSECTION:Wayzata Blvd&France Ave West COUNT DATE: January 6,2015 TIME PERIOD: 4:45 p.m.-5:45 p.m. PEAK HOUR FACTOR: 0.89 "EXISTING TRAFFIC" EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Raw Turning Movements ala 8 0 179 95 2 Peak Season Correction Factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0001.000 EXISTING CONDITIONS ala a 0 179 95 2 'BACKGROUND TRAFFIC' EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR TOTAL"VESTED"TRAFFIC o 0 0 0 0 0 Years To Buildout 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Yearly Growth Rate 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% BACKGROUND TRAFFIC GROWTH z o 0 1 0 0 NON-PROJECT TRAFFIC 416 8 0 180 95 2 "PROJECT TRAFFIC" LAND USE TYPE EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Project Pass-B Trips Net New 114 1 1 1 49 TOTAL PROJECT TRAFFIC flEl114 1 0 1 0 1 49 1 o 0 TOTAL TRAFFIC Sao 1 8 1 0 1 229 1 1 95 1 2 TRAFFIC VOLUMES AT STUDY INTERSECTION INTERSECTION: Wayzata Blvd&France Ave East COUNT DATE: January 6,2015 TIME PERIOD: 4:45 p.m.-5:45 p.m. PEAK HOUR FACTOR: 0.96 "EXISTING TRAFFIC" EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Raw Turning Movements 420 5 0 1 3 2 30 135 0 3 12 143 Peak Season Correction Factor 1.o00 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 EXISTING CONDITIONS 420 5 0 1 3--F-2 30 135 0 3 12 143 'BACKGROUND TRAFFIC' EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR TOTAL"VESTED"TRAFFIC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Years To Buildout 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ]05'%1.1 Yearly Growth Rate 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% BACKGROUND TRAFFIC GROWTH 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 NON-PROJECT TRAFFIC 422 5 0 1 3 z 30 136 0 3 12 144 "PROJECT TRAFFIC" LAND USE TYPE EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Project Pass-B Trips Net New 114 49 TOTAL PROJECT TRAFFIC 114 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 TOTAL TRAFFIC 536 5 1 0 1 3 2 30 136 0 3 12 193 EXISTING (2015) CONDITIONS TRAFFIC ANALYSIS SUMMARY HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.6 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Agency/Co. : KHA Date Performed: 1/6/2015 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: Wayzata Blvd & Quentin Ave Jurisdiction: City of Golden Valley Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2015 Existing Traffic Conds Project ID: West End AUAR Update East/West Street: Wayzata Blvd North/South Street: Quentin Ave Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 60 146 154 95 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 65 160 169 104 Percent Heavy Vehicles 1 Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 1 0 Configuration LT TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 269 192 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 295 210 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade (°s) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / No / Lanes 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 17 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Config LT I LR v (vph) 65 505 C(m) (vph) 1296 594 v/c 0.05 0.85 951 queue length 0.16 9.28 Control Delay 7.9 36.1 LOS A E Approach Delay 36.1 Approach LOS E HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.6 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Agency/Co. : KHA Date Performed: 1/6/2015 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: Wayzata Blvd & France Ave W Jurisdiction: City of Golden Valley Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2015 Existing Traffic Conds Project ID: West End AUAR Update East/West Street: Wayzata Blvd North/South Street: France Ave West Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 414 8 0 179 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 465 8 0 201 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 1 -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 1 0 0 1 Configuration TR LT Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 95 2 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.89 0.89 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 106 2 Percent Heavy Vehicles 1 1 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage No Lanes 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 it 12 Lane Config LT LR v (vph) 0 108 C(m) (vph) 1094 426 v/c 0.00 0.25 95% queue length 0.00 0.99 Control Delay 8.3 16.3 LOS A C Approach Delay 16.3 Approach LOS C HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.6 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: KHA Agency/Co. : KHA Date Performed: 1/6/2015 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: Wayzata Blvd & France Ave E Jurisdiction: City of Golden Valley Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2015 Existing Traffic Conds Project ID: West End AUAR Update East/West Street: Wayzata Blvd North/South Street: France Ave E Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 30 135 0 3 12 143 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 31 140 0 3 12 148 Percent Heavy Vehicles 1 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Yes Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 1 Configuration LTR LT R Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 1 3 2 420 5 0 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1 3 2 437 5 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 1 1 1 1 1 1 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage No / No / Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 17 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Config LTR LT LTR I LTR v (vph) 31 3 6 442 C(m) (vph) 1613 1456 726 718 v/c 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.62 95% queue length 0.06 0.01 0.02 4.27 Control Delay 7.3 7.5 10.0- 17.7 LOS A A A C Approach Delay 10.0- 17.7 Approach LOS A C BACKGROUND (2016) CONDITIONS TRAFFIC ANALYSIS SUMMARY HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.6 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: KHA Agency/Co. : KHA Date Performed: 1/6/2015 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: Wayzata Blvd & Quentin Ave Jurisdiction: City of Golden Valley Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2016 Background Traffic Conds Project ID: West End AUAR Update East/West Street: Wayzata Blvd North/South Street: Quentin Ave Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 60 147 155 95 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 65 161 170 104 Percent Heavy Vehicles 1 -- -- -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 1 0 Configuration LT TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 270 193 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 296 212 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade M 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / No / Lanes 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 17 8 9 10 it 12 Lane Config LT LR v (vph) 65 508 C(m) (vph) 1295 593 v/c 0.05 0.86 95s queue length 0.16 9.48 Control Delay 7.9 37.0 LOS A E Approach Delay 37.0 Approach LOS E HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.6 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: KHA Agency/Co. : KHA Date Performed: 1/6/2015 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: Wayzata Blvd & France Ave W Jurisdiction: City of Golden Valley Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2016 Background Traffic Conds Project ID: West End AUAR Update East/West Street: Wayzata Blvd North/South Street: France Ave West Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 416 8 0 180 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 467 8 0 202 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 1 -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 1 0 0 1 Configuration TR LT Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 95 2 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.89 0.89 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 106 2 Percent Heavy Vehicles 1 1 Percent Grade (o) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage No Lanes 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 17 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Config LT I LR v (vph) 0 108 C(m) (vph) 1092 424 v/c 0.00 0.25 95% queue length 0.00 1.00 Control Delay 8.3 16.4 LOS A C Approach Delay 16.4 Approach LOS C HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.6 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: KHA Agency/Co. : KHA Date Performed: 1/6/2015 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: Wayzata Blvd & France Ave E Jurisdiction: City of Golden Valley Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2016 Background Traffic Conds Project ID: West End AUAR Update East/West Street: Wayzata Blvd North/South Street: France Ave E Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 30 136 0 3 12 144 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 31 141 0 3 12 150 Percent Heavy Vehicles 1 -- -- 1 Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Yes Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 1 Configuration LTR LT R Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 1 3 2 422 5 0 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1 3 2 439 5 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 1 1 1 1 1 1 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage No / No / Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 17 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Config LTR LT LTR LTR v (vph) 31 3 6 444 C(m) (vph) 1613 1448 724 716 v/c 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.62 95% queue length 0.06 0.01 0.03 4.34 Control Delay 7.3 7.5 10.0+ 17.9 LOS A A B C Approach Delay 10.0+ 17.9 Approach LOS B C FUTURE TOTAL (2016) CONDITIONS TRAFFIC ANALYSIS SUMMARY HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.6 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: KHA Agency/Co. : KHA Date Performed: 1/6/2015 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: Wayzata Blvd & Quentin Ave Jurisdiction: City of Golden Valley Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2016 Total Traffic Conds Project ID: West End AUAR Update East/West Street: Wayzata Blvd North/South Street: Quentin Ave Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 76 147 155 144 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 83 161 170 158 Percent Heavy Vehicles 1 Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 1 0 Configuration LT TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 384 231 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 421 253 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / No / Lanes 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 ( 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Config LT I LR v (vph) 83 674 C(m) (vph) 1237 534 v/c 0.07 1.26 95% queue length 0.22 26.90 Control Delay 8.1 156.2 LOS A F Approach Delay 156.2 Approach LOS F HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.6 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: KHA Agency/Co. : KHA Date Performed: 1/6/2015 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: Wayzata Blvd & Quentin Ave Jurisdiction: City of Golden Valley Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2016 Total Traffic Conds +Imp Project ID: West End AUAR Update East/West Street: Wayzata Blvd North/South Street: Quentin Ave Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 76 147 155 144 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 83 161 170 158 Percent Heavy Vehicles 1 -- -- -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? No Lanes 0 1 1 1 Configuration LT T R Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 384 231 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 421 253 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Config LT I L R v (vph) 83 421 253 C(m) (vph) 1237 496 874 v/c 0.07 0.85 0.29 95% queue length 0.22 8.72 1.20 Control Delay 8.1 40.9 10.8 LOS A E B Approach Delay 29.6 Approach LOS D HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.6 Phone: Fax: E-Mail: ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL(AWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: KHA Agency/Co. : KHA Date Performed: 1/13/2015 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: Wayzata Blvd & Quentin Ave Jurisdiction: City of Golden Valley Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2016 Total Traffic Conds +Imp Project ID: West End AUAR Update East/West Street: Wayzata Blvd North/South Street: Quentin Ave Worksheet 2 - Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R Volume 1384 0 231 10 0 0 176 147 0 10 155 144 Thrus Left Lane Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 Ll L2 L1 L2 Configuration L R LT TR PHF 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.91 Flow Rate 421 231 244 328 Heavy Veh 2 0 1 1 No. Lanes 2 1 1 Opposing-Lanes 0 1 1 Conflicting-lanes 1 2 2 Geometry group 1 2 2 Duration, T 0.25 hrs. Worksheet 3 - Saturation Headway Adjustment Worksheet Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Flow Rates: Total in Lane 421 231 244 328 Left-Turn 421 0 83 0 Right-Turn 0 231 0 158 Prop. Left-Turns 1.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 Prop. Right-Turns 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.5 Prop. Heavy Vehicle0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Geometry Group 1 2 2 Adjustments Exhibit 17-33: hLT-adj 0.2 0.2 0.2 hRT-adj -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 hHV-adj 1.7 1.7 1.7 hadj, computed 0.2 -0.6 0.1 -0.3 Worksheet 4 - Departure Headway and Service Time Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 Ll L2 L1 L2 Flow rate 421 231 244 328 hd, initial value 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 x, initial 0.37 0.21 0.22 0.29 hd, final value 5.78 4.93 6.09 5.61 x, final value 0.68 0.32 0.41 0.51 Move-up time, m 2.0 2.0 2.0 Service Time 3.8 2.9 4.1 3.6 Worksheet 5 - Capacity and Level of Service Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 Ll L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Flow Rate 421 231 244 328 Service Time 3.8 2.9 4.1 3.6 Utilization, x 0.68 0.32 0.41 0.51 Dep. headway, hd 5.78 4.93 6.09 5.61 Capacity 609 481 494 578 Delay 19.96 10.20 13.30 14.32 LOS C B B B Approach: Delay 16.51 13.30 14.32 LOS C B B Intersection Delay 15.28 Intersection LOS C HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.6 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: KHA Agency/Co. : KHA Date Performed: 1/6/2015 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: Wayzata Blvd & France Ave W Jurisdiction: City of Golden Valley Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2016 Total Traffic Conds Project ID: West End AUAR Update East/West Street: Wayzata Blvd North/South Street: France Ave West Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 530 8 0 229 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 595 8 0 257 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 1 -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 1 0 0 1 Configuration TR LT Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 95 0 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.89 0.89 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 106 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 1 1 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage No Lanes 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 17 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Config LT LR v (vph) 0 106 C(m) (vph) 979 329 v/c 0.00 0.32 95% queue length 0.00 1.36 Control Delay 8.7 21.1 LOS A C Approach Delay 21.1 Approach LOS C HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.6 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: KHA Agency/Co. : KHA Date Performed: 1/6/2015 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: Wayzata Blvd & France Ave E Jurisdiction: City of Golden valley Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2016 Total Traffic Conds Project ID: West End AUAR Update East/West Street: Wayzata Blvd North/South Street: France Ave E Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 30 136 0 3 12 0 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 31 141 0 3 12 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 1 -- -- 1 -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Yes Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 1 Configuration LTR LT R Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 1 3 2 536 5 0 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1 3 2 558 5 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 1 1 1 1 1 1 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage No / No / Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Config LTR LT LTR LTR v (vph) 31 3 6 563 C(m) (vph) 1613 1448 739 716 v/c 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.79 95% queue length 0.06 0.01 0.02 7.83 Control Delay 7.3 7.5 9.9 25.9 LOS A A A D Approach Delay 9.9 25.9 Approach LOS A D TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS SUMMARY Table 1 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT SUMMARY City: City of Golden Valley Engineer: Adam Gibson, P.E. County: Hennepin Date: Monday, January 19,2015 Major Street: Wayzata Boulevard/Quentin Avenue Lanes: 1 Critical Approach Speed: 35 Minor Street: Wayzata Boulevard Lanes: 1 Volume Level Criteria 1. Is the critical speed of major street traffic> 70 km/h(40 mph)? ❑ Yes ■ No 2. Is the intersection in a built-up area of isolated community of<10,000 population? ❑ Yes ■ No If Question 1 or 2 above is answered "Yes", then use"70%"volume level ❑ 70% ■ 100% WARRANT 1 - EIGHT-HOUR VEHICULAR VOLUME Applicable: 0 Yes ❑ No Warrant 1 is satisfied if Condition A or Condition B is"100%"satisfied. Satisfied: ❑ Yes ® No Warrant is also satisfied if both Condition A and Condition B are "80%"satisfied. Condition A-Minimum Vehicular Volume 100%Satisfied: ❑ Yes ■ No 80% Satisfied: ❑ Yes ■ No Eight Highest Hours Minimum Requirements (volumes in veh/hr) (80%Shown in Brackets) 2 2 2i 2a < < < < < < 0 a a n a a Approach Lanes 1 2 or more o 0 0 0 Volume Level 100% 70% 100% 70% (O r— rl- Co OO O) N M M V lC) to (O Both Approaches 500 E34 on Major Street (400) (280; (�iEO) (335} (208) (422) (3i7) (iHighest Approach 150 X00 '��, 179 233 243 208on Minor Street (120) (8-) (':50; (i12; (179) (233) (120) (;CJ; (142) (243) (208) Record 8 highest hours and the corresponding volumes in boxes provided. Condition is 100%satisfied if the minimum volumes are met for eight hours. Condition is 80%satisfied if parenthetical volumes are met for eight hours. Condition B-Interruption of Continuous Traffic Applicable: ■ Yes ❑ No Condition B is intended for application where the traffic volume is Excessive Delay: ❑ Yes E No so heavy that traffic on the minor street suffers excessive delay. 100% Satisfied: ❑ Yes ■ No 80%Satisfied: ❑ Yes ■ No Eight Highest Hours Minimum Requirements , (volumes in veh/hr) (80%Shown in Brackets) 2 2 2 2 2 a Z> 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 < < < < < < o M M M a- M M M M M Approach Lanes 1 1 2 or more o 0 0 0 0 0 0 (DU') 0 LO U) u, rn 0 u7 Volume Level 100% 70% 100% 70% °? M M M M Mel� o v v v v v v v v (O r� r- COCO 0') N M M V � V7 u7 (O Both Approaches 750 %'. on Major Street 600 /i20 /20 (50/I) (208) �;2:c, 3,1 Highest Approach 75 '0^ iC 179 233 120 100 142 243 345 208 on Minor Street (60) i%5) (80; (56) (179) (233) (120) (100) (142) (243 (345) (208) Record 8 highest hours and the corresponding volumes in boxes provided. Condition is 100%satisfied if the minimum volumes are met for eight hours. Condition is 80%satisfied if parenthetical volumes are met for eight hours. Source: Revised from NCHRP Report 457 K:1NYC_CIVIL\160577004_West_End\[Quentin&Wayzata_SWA_24-hr.xlsx]Warrant 1 Table 2 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT SUMMARY City: City of Golden Valley Engineer: Adam Gibson, P.E. County: Hennepin Date: Monday, January 19,2015 Major Street: Wayzata Boulevard/Quentin Avenue Lanes: 1 Critical Approach Speed: 35 Minor Street: Wayzata Boulevard Lanes: 1 Volume Level Criteria 1. Is the critical speed of major street traffic>70 km/h(40 mph)? ❑ Yes ■ No 2. Is the intersection in a built-up area of isolated community of<10,000 population? ❑ Yes ■ No If Question 1 or 2 above is answered "Yes",then use"70%"volume level ❑ 70% ■ 100% WARRANT 2 - FOUR-HOUR VEHICULAR VOLUME Applicable: ■ Yes ❑ No If all four points lie above the appropriate line,then the warrant is satisfied. Satisfied: ❑ Yes ■ No Plot four volume combinations on the applicable figure below. FIGURE 4C-1: Criteria for"100%"Volume Level 700 x 600 = 2 OR IAORE LA 4ES&2 O R MORE L kNES F-Q 500 w0 UJ a400 to Q 2 OR MORE LANES&1 LANE K ,0 M 300 0 X X 1LANE ILANE > 200 x O 100 X 115 x '80 Four Volumes JHighest Major Minor o Hours Street Street 30o ao0 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 taoo MAJOR STREET-TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES-VPH 7:30 AM- 422 233 8:30 AM 8:30 AM- Note:317 120 115 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor street approach with two or more lanes and 9:30 AM 80 vph applies as the lower threshold volume threshold for a minor street approach with one lane. 3:45 PM- 366 243 4:45 PM FIGURE 4C-2: Criteria for"70%"Volume Level 4:45 PM- 405 345 (Community Less than 10,000 population or above 70 km/hr(40 mph) on Major Street) 5:45 PM 711 400 x 2 OR MORE LANES&2 OR MORE LANES F Q 300 W W 2 OR M RE LANES& LANE �a ma � 200 Ow f1 LANE&1 LANE O > 100 x '80 C7 60 x 0 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 MAJOR STREET-TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES-VPH Note: 80 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor street approach with two or more lanes and 60 vph applies as the lower threshold volume threshold for a minor street approach with one lane. Source: Revised from NCHRP Report 457 K:\NYC_CIVIL\160577004_West_End\[Quentin&Wayzata_SWA_24-hr.xlsx]Warrant 1 MULTI-WAY STOP WARRANT ANALYSIS SUMMARY Multi-Way Stop Control Summary Highest 8 Hours Wayzata Boulevard & Quentin Avenue 6:30-7:30 7:30-8:30 8:30-9:30 12:00-1:00 2:45-3:45 3:45-4:45 4:45-5:45 5:45-6:45 8-Hour am am am pm pm pm pm pm Avg Major 208 422 317 155 209 366 405 220 288 Minor 179 233 120 100 142 243 345 208 196 Major> 300? NO YES YES NO NO YES YES NO NO Minor> 200? NO YES NO NO NO YES YES YES NO INTERSECTION SIGHT PHOTOS Sight Distance Wayzata Blvd and Quentin Ave Eastbound 66n south 01-06-2015 Right View : . . �» » . . . .. w.�:..w. . aw Sight Distance Wayzata Blvd and Quentin Ave Eastbound facing north 01-06-2015 Left View .rdj�3 1 r�1 n OPPis •. 8 Sight Distance Wayzata Blvd and Natchez Ave Northbound facing east 01-07-2015 Right View ..rE p � °ter Sight Distance Wayzata Blvd and Natchez Ave Northbound facing west 01-07-2015 Left View 'a. 1 I t .: -, .. _., ... Sight Distance Wayzata Blvd and Fairlawn Way Northbound facing east 01-07-2015 Right View r; xx, Sight Distance Wayzata Blvd • Fairlawn Way Northbound 01-07-2015 Left View „pw+rt r,#RL p7 sE� Sight Distance Wayzata Blvd and June Ave Northbound 01-07-2015 Right View .,ate fn �. t Sight Distance Wayzata Blvd and June Ave Northbound facing west 01-07-2015 Left View J" t t $ ■lye Sight Distance Wayzata Blvd and Tyrol Trail Northbound 01-07-2015 Right View 3� d Y� .$ route Sight Distance Wayzata Blvd and Tyrol Trail Northbound facing west 01-07-2015 Left View Sight Distance Wayzata Blvd and Tyrol Trail (Over Crosswalk) Northbound facing east 01-07-2015 Right View 't x Sight Distance Wayzata Blvd and Tyrol Trail (Over Crosswalk) Northbound facing west 01-07-2015 Left View Mme. Sight Distance Wayzata Blvd and France Ave(Golden Valley) Northbound facing east 01-07-2015 Right View <. g Sight Distance Wayzata Blvd and France Ave(Golden Valley) Northbound facing west 01-07-2015 Left View y -,r.. t sY� a lw , Sight Distance Wayzata Blvd and France Ave(Minneapolis) Northbound facing east 01-07-2015 Right View t Sight Distance Wayzata Blvd and France Ave(Minneapolis) Northbound facing west 01-07-2015 Left View 4{ Wittman, Lisa From: Jeannie Hughes <hugleve@aol.com> Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 5:55 PM To: Planning; Harris, Shep Subject: Formal Hearing Regarding the formal hearing about the 2 six story residential buildings and the two 11 story office towers and the 5000 space parking ramp: What do Golden Valley residence get out of it besides the traffic?What will happen to the property values of the homes off Wayzata Blvd after the traffic increases&our sight lines are gone? Has anyone looked into the value of our homes & the property taxes we pay?The property taxes in South Tyrol are significant. Hwy 100 is under construction for 2 years. Those of us who use 100&394 daily know they really can't take much more traffic between 7-9AM &4-6:30 pm. Also adding more housing?We are being over developed. There are apartments & condo's going up all over the cities. One of the housing units will be partially in St.Louis Park & partially in Golden Valley? How will that work for taxes, school district, fire & police? Duke came in 7 years ago & sold everyone on a class A retail development. It is a entertainment area with retail stores you can find at any mall. Hardly A level. Will this be the same thing?Then the developer sell years later as Duke did. Golden Valley should take a very serious look at this project & really see what this means to it's high tax paying South Tyrol residents. Jean Leveque 1415 Fairlawn Way i _ I IT ICA (0 11 -��1. -!� Ja• . � . . � .L tL . y;,, �,.-+ ..L �+5h.y, s^y'1 aN .' ~� AVE , .� .� 00 r .. ! Park Gateway v Monument ; . z i RESIDENTIAL Ag r pen Recreation 4 � _b "r7 Green 4_ A . T SOUTH it LINEAR ' . .. . NORTH t OFFICE PARK I OFFICE WOONERF ". -_ DOG RUN -- PUBLIC ART/ __ I WATER FEATURE EXISTING 1 , HOTEL HEALTH PARTNERS J41 y 1 _ - 1 PARKING f STRUCTURE �Jp 1 -- -- ` RESIDENTIAL P — E_ �� y . " LEGEND eW , a y i s r --'`"'`� �. ~- "., ,-, ,. •.,,,,. � `. n. ``` � DECIDUOUS TREES i - ,m ATE NIGHW--,,.,� AY 100 = .. ORNAMENTALTREES 4 n Property L'p y me '�� _ .kms_ uR EVERGREEN TREES SHRUB BEDS r FEB 04 2015 WEST END DEVELOPMENT Kimley ))) Horn - D L cSt. Louis Park, MN / Golden Valley, MN February 2015 architects 0 25' So' DRAFT CENTRAL PARK WEST P . U . D . R.T..DOC.NO. KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS:That DLC Residential LLL,a Florida limited liability company,owner of the fallowing described property: I Marcus F.Hampton do hereby certify that this plat was prepared by me or under my direct supervision;that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor in the State of Minnesota;that this plat is a correct representation of the boundary survey;that all mathematical data and labels are wmectly designated on this Outlot A,THE SHOPS AT WEST END. plat,that all monuments depicted on this plat have been,or will be correctly set within one year;that all water boundaries and wetlands,as defined in Minnesota Statutes,Section 505.01,Subd.3,as of the date of this certificate are shown and labeled on this plat;and all public ways are shown and labeled Registered Property on this plat. Certificate of Title No.1222619 Dated this_day of ,20— Lots 0 .Lots 2,3,4 and 6,Block 4,except that portion of said Lots taken for Belt Line Highway; Lots 7 to 12 inclusive,Block 4,and that part of Raleigh Avenue vacated lying between the Westerly extension of the South line of said Lot 7 and the North line of said Lot 12 and that part of the vacated alley in said Block 4 lying between the Easterly extensions of the North and South lines of said Lot 7 and Marcus F.Hampton,Licensed Land Surveyor between the South line of said Lot 9 and the North line of said Lot 11 and that part of the West 1/2 of the vacated alley in said Block 4lying between the Minnesota License No.47481 extensions of the North and South lines of said Lot 8 and between the North and South lines of said Lot 12; All in"Kavlis Cedardale". STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF That part of the following described property: That part of vacated Raleigh and Douglas Avenues as shown on the plat of"Kavlis Cedardale"lying between the extensions across said Avenues of the South The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20�by Marcus F.Hampton,a Licensed Land Surveyor. and West lines of Lot 7,Block 4 and that part of said vacated Douglas Avenue adjoining Lots 6 and 7,Block 4 of said plat lying between the Westerly line of Belt Line Highway and the extension across said Avenue of the West line of said Lot 7,Block 4,"Kavlis Cedardale"; Which lies Northerly of a straight line extending between the Southwest corner of Tract E,Registered Land Survey No.864,Hennepin County,Minnesota and the Westerly right-of-way of State Trunk Highway 100 passing through a point on the East line of said Tract E distant 18.18 feet North of the Southeast Notary Public, County,Minnesota Notary Printed Name corner of said Tract E as measured along said East line. My Commission Expires Registered Property Certificate of Title No.1012678 CRY COUNCIL,CITY OF SAINT LOUIS PARK,MINNESOTA Lot 1,Block 4,"Kavlis Cedardale"and that part of the vacated alley in said Block 4,lying East of the center line thereof and between the extensions across It of the North and South Tines of said Lot 1. This plat of CENTRAL PARK WEST P.U.D.was approved and accepted by the City Council of the City of Saint Louis Park,Minnesota,at a regular meeting thereof held this_day of 20—and said plat Is in compliance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes,Section 505.03,Subd.2. And That part of the North 693.61 feet of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 30,Township 29,Range 24 lying Westerly and Southerly of City Council,City of Saint Louis Park,Minnesota State Trunk Highway No.100,also known as the Belt Une Highway. Registered Property By: Mayor By Clerk Certificate of Title No.1012734 That part of the South 60 feet of the North 753.61 feet of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 30,Township 29,Range 24,lying West CRY COUNCIL,CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY,MINNESOTA of the Belt Une Highway. This plat of CENTRAL PARK WEST P.U.D.was approved and accepted by the City Council of the City of Golden Valley,Minnesota,at a regular meeting Registered Property thereof held this_day of 20_and said plat is in compliance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes,Section 505.03,Subd.2. Certificate of Title No.1012680 That part of vacated Raleigh Avenue and of vacated Douglas Avenue,all according to the plat of"Kavlis Cedardale"lying Westedy of the Westerly right of City Council,City of Golden Valley,Minnesota way line of State Trunk Highway No.100 as described in the Final Certificate recorded in Book 412 of Miscellaneous Records,page 148 in the office of the County Recorder and lying Southerly of a line drawn from the Southwest corner of Tract E,Registered Land Survey No.864 and passing through a point on the East line of said Tract E distant 18.18 feet North of the Southeast comer of said Tract E. By: Mayor By Clerk Registered Property Certificate of Title No.1012686 That part of vacated Utica Avenue South,as dedicated on the plat of THE SHOPS AT WEST END,Hennepin County,Minnesota,lying easterly of the following RESIDENT AND REAL ESTATE SERVICES,Hennepin County,Minnesota described line: Commencing at the northwest corner of Outlot A,said plat,thence on an assumed bearing of South,along the west line of said Outlot A,a distance of I hereby certify that taxes payable in 20_and prior yeah have been paid for land described on this plat,dated this day of 95.16 feet to a corner of said Outlot A and the point of beginning of the line to be described;thence,continuing on a bearing of South,a distance of 20 81.53 feet to a corner of said Outlot A,and said line there terminating. Has caused the same to be surveyed and platted as CENTRAL PARK WEST P.U.D.and does hereby dedicate to the public for public use the public way and Mark V.Chapin,County Auditor By Deputy drainage and utility easements as created by this plat. In witness whereof said DLC Residential LLC,a Florida limited liability company,has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this SURVEY DIVISION,Hennepin County,Minnesota day of .20_ Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 383B.565(1969),this plat has been approved this day of 20_ SIGNED:DLC RESIDENTIAL LLC Chris F.Mavis,County Surveyor By By as REGISTRAR OF TITLES,Hennepin County,Minnesota --in, r•+'-- y f STATE OF MINNESOTA I hereby certify that the within plat of CENTRAL PARK WEST P.U.D.was filed in this office this day of 20� COUNTYOF at_o'clock_.M. Y y R 7 2015 This instrument was acknowledged before me this da of 20�b ��'` ` � y T ,as of DLC Residential LLC,a Florida limited liability company,on behalf of the Martin McCormick,Registrar of Titles By Deputy company. Notary Public, County,Minnesota Notary Printed Name My Commission Expires SAMBATEK, INC. ENGINEERING,PLANNING AND LAND SURVEYING SHEET 10F 2 SHEETS DRAFT R.T..DOC.NO. CENTRAL PARK WEST P . U . D . O DENOTES 1/2 INCH BY 14 INCH IRON MONUMENT SET AND MARKED BY LICENSE NO. 47481. ! DENOTES 1/2 INCH IRON MONUMENT FOUND UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN. 'E) DENOTES SECTION CORNER MONUMENT ~ THE SOUTH LINE OF OUTLOTA,THE SHOPS AT WEST p.•I�. y@q�<�y dsb'20.fir "TN'' �I, „ Id0 '� NORTH END,IS ASSUMED TO HAVE ABEARING OF SOUTH 89 UNE O PfR 1g.•.�' 240@ �;-_La DEGREES 39 MI NUTES 44 SECONDS WEST. -�'_Opa Na�4p15f0 T-lr--------------- R--835.60 h;.i j ' y � 0 50 100 60573 R�9549J p�J6'10'JY y$b/1'186�52,04�W „L-99.65 -5.0��_ - ``♦♦ SCALE IN iiii FEET _- L• R�904.93d��i♦ N 9,krs0w19.34 c_T@ams @� [-4 �- , L=46.38 -�Y,---23@< _ 93sb�vd-llyl�9:19 (� X2'$6'13' f0saa 1 yR�•o>'ao' 267 I 3C�jbR�l �-i ��eG4�/i /�/v�s�/�i--�-`'��p�a��1.�3'"'',8(5,g14.Y�J`♦`�-L-�77=•52�5,�7.a1'�_-5-_y-3's1a'04lr84-i'�a4W8� '�t/•�c;�''ITo�rr+=ti --A0+-nI o71 9I1 u•uf>�>•rr a ST@A0Y149-44I7@-r@T<N504I-�7 - rAN I�,`jaM`u_,E--ryg�T-�t-`�-I�'°�x--',ly-�A/7?7Xj,?2u£@•1�_.�z�`a�_aeivj r..'e•�xA_�i`N�.uF,P-_°y�v-�U_�`T_a',`T°NORTH c -Y_`�_<--T_`c>�:a-N`r��V___o<_a�-T/,°2♦�H,°I^�(�'I_-J rvIn?l.�roz�'-1��1sT '33'0 ?110I wFD L54741 10LTTa \97; - 1 1qr 7 217 0RA7ACE ' dtL=3 9 ',S2/•4/Y9T UwTY a IA5/ 3, L M25 y5 NORTH nm0-,j•! A-48 : LII T_ \�71.63 S16 Brg C �S7i'16:T7N•' +�� k ♦ 6721 1 / / 1 '�• C-4C48_ sootbb2 OI I 1 - - - �- �...Y,�,- - - R 1 I - - - - T- - - - - •r \TANcDvr- �I �I �\ \� I I �NAL I tl I �� '� �j- .,. ...,,. -. � � � � /'T♦;ic `�� ♦�e7�r'a9�'��a gsias9- r/♦ �tl/C=6'7..15 1, _'_--� � !� __ - '♦I I - I $ _ ' I P N77'47TTC -` ��5705>;50w 11�. - c --Ncnm14.37 i i ��I € \ I I I I I I TSI � zzzs N✓7ruf 1//�-��-TcroaT/``I ri _ rrr 95jr I� r scnt0a7T1Ju@9 j I I b_8 >I I I I � AI i I� RDn Aa- T� f d� �/ a Iii $ 2iq a9AavA0 a u7uTr, r i•/V/ I R$ EAmxNT 8 < b I � I $ / `! loltau 1, 'T j o I I I I I 1 tel_ Z r II V --- NOOboDOT 134.92----,- '8: I`m7@ sa 3 F- jr'•� / �I 1 NORTH 52.20 h 1 46:-70,♦.i'FD MAG NL -RLS N0. R �R pAK- EAST LOF 7AACTE 5 210'007 i -,H] 13NAIL '� R.cs as<- SOOhO'1VIE N90,00.007 49.00 „16/ ^r• / 1 1992 �' li -1\� '^ a/ 4 I U7/UTY EAF7/ENT-a? y.0 T- 1 \ A7M M4N EASEL16VT w i J O I I OUTLOT A vtx DX m7.sza74.% ` ffN DOC Na 4QM04 HZ s I Noa77•57T._ y7�_ W. 51.42 '41 SN CORNER SECTION 70_- il•� of $I, I _ ti/t•�A / NORTH 323.28 �1:-I I.^ I row.-� 21.45l� J N I __ \k ` 5wtv'1O'N 81.20-1 N I I I �I h I r 18 1E�0 1 942 4 I V �I m Im II I I I 81 �`I IyJ vt I �I `I m l gl I IH EI R=24.33 DRAWA6r&UW7Y _ I I I s omoo-E o Eu uAc NNL. ♦o Ls 4�46i J Is L-38.73 o'EASEAkTVT --'.,J.'_I`:T E_:.' '.1T.{.1,' a7J-1c�; N0,00Li7T 1 .5'500 -_-_ ---% P-_6 'I -FD &91'12.12'.'% „, nsz 1 N@979' E t I _ --a- --- -___--- 3.88- , - L-93.17 �' I ♦ t I AFD LS 47401 _ -- 3892 ,asz- _ ' lags _--- o o 1 M103'50�22'W�I � 24.85•A G -1-------�c--- -- ------ 1---'1 - Io.o ' I /L --- ED Ls 47481 313.83 ------ _ 141.03 0 ' 142--- ,o 2- 0 --- Fo L54i o- _ 14 / i R-4 ♦♦ I eels 1 � sxls 057 FD s4746,. � �; - N0T09 55'W 187. 55�W i�N46'2'O SEI 4=12 � w rte cL. - _ .. ♦ .fD NAG NAIL '09. '10'7 . N00vo�wI UTICA AVENUES NORTH-479.71 167.98 ear ♦t N52 10• I o I k n aJs�' `ass -NORTH 93.80 , 10.04 9.98 �4 36 52 m I. Nl _I 1 eb h` UTI(A AVENUE c, � N00'4056'E � RL 3�y � 1 i - 0 A=7b9'55'0 V 10, g$ h- I .e ENGINEERING, EG,PLANNNG 1 AND LAND SURVEYING SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS `Sambatek www.sambatek.com 12600 WMtewmel Drb.Sul&300 Mlnlle lea.MN 55343 ]63,4]6.6010 telai l— SURVEY NOTES SUBJECT PROPERTY(CONT.) TB3A76A532tHDWM 1.Theburlysynemhba on On010T ESHOPSATWESTEXDv an..w bl.r gdSmthMdr ."mhaeesmxc.m,Wenforthe zl.ie ms,caditgns+nae+sememfor6+,m+inxaM pDeBnn,it Huard Mbneapnrx eas 0mpam/,as mot+mea mtl+•EaxmnM1 tlaba EN'NNN9 91Iwrig1 Pkao"IFmFOplenW sowhlinedlyWa[0. --q 15,1969,—d May 14,1968++Oors.nmi No.908133. 2.Thevertk,lartum hbabtl on xAvpel_Tw nymNinB bentll marb•rc MNppx 3]g9AYand MN00r2J8941 bad rale eE ripen[M1e MnWTGeodetic EaementhYwnnn Mefveey. Oabbab , _ Client ilia IalbsNry.- ass,—.on the I—.,ll—btM Lane duvlbedb Px¢la12and 6: BENCHMA-1 Ri I—DIe+�aN. 1M k1915a,lmpment Na.1129521. -®--�---�, DUKE REALTY Fire hydnNrt nwthwen miner hf—,Ad pmpeh,as sMwm,h—- NO3E:Document N.11]9521 has mphM by Its own fermi. iHN FN.at0.35 Rubkibn ria I U.The raXown appear As memanals Ah-CenlBatez dTMr ror[M uod dmmbed--ft 2 and A: �� CORPORATION f12k M QmVthmn mmeMsurveYee¢openy. /a)Wmnnryoeed daetl Myvst311911,remNetl SeprcmMr 7.19rt as Document Na 129222].wlchrmasa easements and crux «N Ekv.�B)50 .and (b)OeGn[lon of Tefmlvtbna EaxemeM doled October 1.1986,rcmrded OaabefZ1986u o,h—[No.11608691aM 3.Sublu[propeny�atltlretb[md propeMMemMlcatlm nrmbers xe. Icl Declanban drennina[and Rertriction da t,,cm--d 1600 Onaberl]996 as poowmn[Na.i)fi0B60. Erement err ree remktbna rip Iayer.Naa M.wryeyee a.ppe.ty,eaumank not Yk,wn se nawryey. 1600 UTICA AVENUE SOUTH 5p]S Way,naBM 30-039-34310003 U.terms and mnditnm dRewMion No 8s1016ytM CAyd5l.loos vah,Pamaya,pecialpbmkaAowirydN mnnnn4ondmolf 1yV SUITE 250 1511Ikia Aw$ 30039-24320Q26 1AW sink Nwy No 1W5 30039-24-330W2 budelry ane pamry kmlty,wtmluN 1s,1985.rcmdM luh31.199T as Dawrrwe Xa.I661]Ds. ST.LOUIS PARK,MN 55416 1500 Stan Nwy NO =S 3DOM2b3—s 0¢Nmem dam ria—ft—.lkoptr[Y. TRemlwlm Nn g6A6 ryMe[IryeSt.laub Park PantkgawnAtlbnal use pmMlYbwWBtM mmtrlxtlmd ]S noNkebulldme antlp HJM hdIM.datM Apnl21,198fi,recoN<d A{xN 29,I986n Daamem Ho.l]39882. SUBJECT PROPERTYo¢+m.m spin n¢dka rix wry.Yaa aapalr 26.EAmmen[forirlemmmunla[bmpepmn,InhvardNorthwe4emBe1lTekpMneComrynY,asmwbetllndeFafemaedatea CA SHEfT2 OutbtA TheShopsAt Wen End,—p..[Homy. A, mmt Ap¢ kr Roetlway antl«YMa dine OdoMr1.1986,remdM October 2,1986 u¢ummDt No.17—,aM UrtTiotc of rlae Ho.1222fi19 (b)iemrlruUon 01 Eabm<m Im Roaeway and UIIII]in aAnement dated June 20,1991,rccoNed3um 20,1991 u Dmmnent No. 2821035. Project Eremene m brym arkm mewrwyAa p,mrnr ad h rad Ywwn on dex.Yey. Panels: u.renins and mnerons,lwualrywsemena,as mm.lneamlM mlkwvme: `' I I - �— un13,Osie 6,ebclle¢ep[that mrdondsa,e LptsMon brach Une Nighw+Y; tai RecmroalUumentOMarQlon andpdrcemem Gtrd pnnMri,19�6,rcmkea Ocmhr2.,9%ax DocHmrm rvp.l>601)y aM r I�Hf WEST END— 11 Indmlw,Black 4aM tMt pan of Paleyh Avenue varw.n Iyby between Me Wederlyerembn d11N SOMh gra ds,b Lot J aM the HoM tlrc of Zh�Amendmem d RedproW Usemmt Oetlarrtgn artl Aanemed tlatMlum 20,199],recorded lune 30,5997 as Dmument No. -.=--3 13, aid bt l2 mtl[halrynddn we+ted aMyin oid Bga4Nm6 Mtwem db EaseH]eldennomdtM NOM mdSvuM1kw dadlm]aid between the wrrn«ew.ar and ra.dwry aM utllMwwaar,reds do net elan Mefurwyad aoTm-Eberblara...mwtl.Yw.n an nN wrreY. UNDEVELOPED Spun line of este Id 9 and Me Xorth Ilm of old m111 and lMt part of Vb wen]4 d Me vaobd shry In MM Bbck♦lMry betw¢n tM eaknsions d iM . n NOM ane xMn line,d¢r Ld 9+ria benaan ere north ana Soots tinea dvid Im u; I 29.The rolbw3ry Aocear ax mertgnd,mme unlnatnaTMe brlM lane dmmbeam var¢h x,3,4 ana s: I AX In`MNls Ueedale" .W11 (v) —hvendens eetN Mann 2d,]989,remded Mry f0,19B9as Dow mem Xa.Hsi 3585. �� Ib)PaM1lal pl5charge Olxdked Uspmeena eaten JuM 10,1989,rcmNN lull 13.1989 es Dowmmt X0.10353«. I Thrt wrt pf Me fdlowhy tlescnMe prapeM: XQIE:The Panel pbcMrBe dHat'l¢d lis vendens Ib ahoue b into memodal m the Urdfivte d iakbrtM aria desvbed in Poral That port d wa[M—i9h and Dw81u Avenue u snovn on the plat d`luNh Ccdardak'Mrd between Ore eat<nslom soma sale Avenue d[M1e SOMh aM S art linesdlat>,Nohland Mrt DM darvxatea moans Avenin tllwNry ls%s6and J,Bbck4dud plrt MM belwA•n lM WnbM Xne of Bek Ulb D¢umerm do,m axes Me wNveyeg lka%rtY. �—_ I ��i o—u NlgM1ww M1e esgmslon wou,aM Armmdtne 30.rams antl mndtlom dPA.alumnNo.92-19)by[heClty of X.Wuh vats,pantmgamneWonaluu WMft NWwh,9dryaMdN h1 W Nm din bl),BI¢FA,`MNH Ueamak`;whkn Iles xeMerNd•rtnlprt llm ektarlry between the Southwat�rn•drran E,PeelnaN lard —A—,212992,--Jxgxry 7,1993u Oocumen[No.2331823. _ XIIiI Survey m.960,H-1, UunLv,Minnmou ane McW—E rlghtrorvry o/SureTrunk wghwry 100mMmglhrcu8ha palmrnthefMIme of Mltl Tnr1Eirisin aAaai porta LYawn an tlrewvry. / dimntl6.lB ke[Xarth oftM SowMan mrmld ear Tran Eos meaund abry die fast Tne. �° Q Reels[erM Pm¢M 31.ih¢m[ernesd MC Sv[e of Mlmmspm,IraWdln f¢Ymple ink,eascmen[MntsaM aavllmliatlorb,ummAlnee In TM1e PamY Mal .�.I}T11I1I I1o Urtifio[edr�le No.10126]8 —0—Ad—h—r 3,199;Headed leN31,1993 uDocumem Nv.2A01510. rT llll ll!111� ❑ I r1 I hem'Matl a¢m+rr rtalniry plea�rrem.¢Yawl an ere wren.Nlpwry eremera,rc emkK rod AOlvyer•Neo Me i1 Partel3: wrveyedprepeM,tM1eY•rcnotsMwspnMe,urveY• 1 ! Location int 1 Bbcka,'Yavl'a CNadak"and Mrt part d the vaaletl a9ey in ar BIOQ A,lying East arts Cerner I—I1Nraa(aM 1N hii•n the—nionwis arms ltd 32.Terms,cmeklons and eassmem fro wamrmam purpoxes,m fawn d[M Ury eGaleen VaNry,as mribined In Me Quo Galin Deed Mee H�it 1i7I tM Xonh ma sl1h Gm dura tat L f1tll1l il�� 1 January3,199A,r¢orOed uAnm]5,199[as mcumem Xo.3491360. I ST. LOUIS PARK, and UMm•nt h,lrxrn en div fvwy. r ilm[part otdN NoM 693.61 kat ortM Northmsa Quarkrol Lha SauMwmtOwltmd Xttlon 30,TowmMp A,Nary¢nlYln WrsmMard smtheay or 33.T,rmsane mndltlorv,IncW0lry eabmtrrm,as mnbbedmtlx rolbwmg: j. kllif lam, lid I MN Sum Twhk Hlgn,hi,-l00,Ysoknpwnasdb Bm Une HXhw lar Opefrtkn and UmmeniNrecmeeRaana Nne 20,199],recoreea hoe N,199]u0ocummt No.]A21030;xr ttl�'1111-- 10)Flirt pmermmmt m Opernbnantl FasemeN Apeement¢Med September 30,2W0,remreea De¢mber28,2000 n Dxumem No_ i I I I Rnhkree vropeM m51TJ8;em �11_.1 Mab dlMe Xo.1012]34 act first—h—to Op<mgn and D-1 Ail—daktl m¢mbm 9,2G1%rsmrtled—W28,ZO1]as Downxrrt Na. 913]21. Pxce10: ¢rvl¢dnye,a aellsryrtlsyarca and•meaam rte m[deMNbYdvplptlon Mth<d¢umenb;IhNr y Il_,It 1111tIk Thr part dine SouM m lea dMe Honn]53.61 lett MMe Northean pvartad Me Sowhwnt Quarter eswtgn 30,Twmshlp 19.RanP 3A,lylnN Writ d appmnnsxa mann a¢Nowa m Ma aurvry.Usmunb aver Utb Asewe m lorym,fMtha wryayad prapaty. li'11�11{I Il IHl T�T([ilMb tM Beh line Highway. 31.Terms And wn0lnomldam lmd OaoMF 18,2001,remrdetl mmaWi b3l 3as Rnhtend0¢umenn afkN a1 1 all,.d •we .n.—of rde properly. 71115 Dm� / UnfiNo.1022690 r ern+_"1 3s.Me ronmNry AopeAn Bf•mmmrnl m Me ca[lllarc orrMe ror me Mna amxneee m varcd 1: Perrel5: PezoWtim No.09-046 by[M CM d5[.bus Dark,8win awmal da aelimirwryplrt,dated Mardi 3,2009,ramrded MaM SB,2009 as Thu ry5n dyaotM Raleyh Avenue ane a notctl mudu Avemo,aX amadin m eh,prat of'Yavlh Qrareak"MNWuamhd Mc WrsbrN nets d wry Omumem rb.+622891. g mtermnF Xlghwxy No.100 as described M Me Fm+I CMlflote rworded m Book ASi dMhagamom IN4..d rya¢SAB k Mel pw d Me Courcy D¢umam sparrow pMimirury IAw d lON4k5 AT WEST ENDavw P+rW 1 d dsa,uMytl pmMM Remrda and Nlna bumerlydallne dnvmlrom Me SwtMamt mmereTnn E,Raylnaee lam Sur,ey No.Bfiland pasYy[hmn6a peen en the U,[Ilm 1J.Term,and wndl[IorU,kgWalmcabnerls,,smn[NmOIn Me NeclproW 4semmtaM M,bknxceApeemml MIM Wen Fnd vublk I p� dvld Tnn E dlibm le.lerem north dMeSpuMnn[omQ of MMTon E ImDmwmmb, RReRfehabnrdeOryvrmapeeeG MUtmhrtmitvhneepmroNpaert.Ny an.s6ueb6lr3aBt2miHin11 Smtlaetdeudk DB04,SJe4n0g1n0,2 MHrterFe'vonf wAimryeaMae nvTineke nInuwmnbemnanUrymmrymrry azHians sparmd dYdMnguns,Ztl.NFsahlpbrvb.inryhemmms mXmo'sb M.Termws,t m30n,e2lhDfgsons..xremztcMumloenms NenOd.Anrib3mB2e8n. ls,as mntairne.,N,tlaasroe M'nM aaldn Uenrevnwarv,eUY.st 5 e 24,mbm Apeeme Nerwem Outr Cerci ieatlon UMate oTNo.012686 MldpM mhy K mde0 S,M,hMr 34,00 a[m1 No.n9«99. 19,w11,1ln36,3910 an rotiurvry nlabd Nan[. Ipeu,[pats ana wimnan¢Mnr,rmt raver aN d Parm11 d dr furreyd pmryM.a mown anew wrvry.«Mruwnann de int ages me wrveyed P—ry 10.Therolbwa6 appearsasa redbl en tM U dTtk fOrtM trrd tlescebedm Px¢I1: SWledm.ryrpetwleabmeminnwrdGn.[NOMem RYlwrytompmy,Im su¢euon fMa,dprs lortlw mnnruNon,maMtmmce ane op tion Al.fwuenrese pr¢eedinP pmdim q[M CourdHenmpin Uurny,Minnesw,Wier Use Na.2>-CVSAOZB2.In hi,.ensnare darallwry lncAor beetsupmt owrmd arms pertd[M SouMwen pwrterdthe SoulNv+e Quarter or5ec[Ion 30,Tawnnlp 29,RAnge 2a seen uDNhanda hiawbiAALA ontmndb,NMI wails isbn ,d.Staniar MlIA, v,Duke pealryumlmd vanneaNp,an daaiMa in ONer Qac Np 908193;(mesas m pan emus A ane adjoink8 dedkatrd Ulio Averwe SwnM 512291IImhM wrtneMb,em{as dhcbud by favtl¢d M ventlms drtedluN 13011,recorded IpNe.Liu as mwmem No. NORTH Fawmenthrz,nm alfM Ilea wrvewd properry.rdhn¢Mownmue survry. 291m. 0 120 240 e oblen aM propene dead a¢bn Is m amulre¢rbM pmpeM for wIIM pMPOses- 12-11Awm8 appears ass redbl an tM UrWOom dirk b[M and dewribN in Px¢I 2: E,bmenb+rr mmpaary ea¢mmban ahwnantM wrrey. SE2VE IN FEET Subkn m a reservatlan by IM Stale d Mtn—.d—AO..mineral dell.;lu m tom Z vM W wderMly Ivo Arc[hewn pn dae,u,sey. la.TM1emllowme+ppesn as a ramal on Me ElwOwk dTitle btM uM demnbMln Px¢I 5: Subkn m a per¢[wl easement In(awrd Gnat NorM•-rn Ratlwry CammnY.lmfumeswb aM uYPs(a dN mnmrraon,mam[enanceand opmtbn da rYlwrytnrksa o-am Xpm ana dam,tMt ryrt dm.primes eertre.d A,ronpw,: Summary Aryral of nndbuleSm[hwen Qwrtmol Me SOMhweslOwnm,S¢Don 301ymg E,rtedy o(a Nne amwn pmlklrM,M elstanl9 f¢[Waledy msipred-. Drawn:a eawrrda[rym+Hak,ane mdalNfmm tMamerBm d:aur o-+rp No.11Mreinartrraertribeel and wertedyd,Rmdmen rymlkl ed,n,na aimnt ="TABLE A"NOTES A 9f¢tEasterly meuurctl al ryhl aneln mtl nelalNtmm Me anter Bne,pur[nck Xo.3(M¢InaRerdewl04d)entl atessYry hom sYtl line dnwnrt Dproved'.Mxx Book/page:foG/Si MIA aryls Mmnh pdm'A`HartM1eM m a Ilnc pamtlN wkh and dkunt ZOOlett Som"measured m Hgllt arylm Rvretlye saN NOM Ilm dine 3.Tne subjen pm¢M Ike wMb Flmtl vnln lane K per FFMA FIRM Maps No.2]063C0351E,27053W362E,2]453CQ353k l]053C0359E pha Southwest Quarter of[M SmMwest puarter,Section 30,die anter Erre dspaback No.l a describes ufo6ow: tlAIN p9/OZ/20D6 se: Inlpal Issued:m/m/zays W.hhiry u urrekrcn¢point"A`;the¢¢ii rt dY,lo a id rim Wh,,A SmMw yincW d, Ii,a92 ik-1Kminutm with said North Aare.dthe wbkn ]3 A.Aonw 15559uare Bt. IlnedtM1e Sodhwstmaner dthe SovMw,st Quartef.5ectbn 30 for]6 feR drama abryal)depeeWMmbwrvem Meleltbr15.5 keUtheir¢ T""'"�` prop . A581ee —CERTIFICATION Revision History abng a twsgmt SzO.T feet;Men¢Nay a 1)eeP«aD mkxrte curse M Me dem bf 35 feel and therebermmmQ bz Tha,en]ry Mprmadon has rot baro pmeded by doe hit". NO.Date By Submittal/Revision Sar¢mer Ilm d,pu.tock No.2 is ae+pibee as lolbw:BRinningrtvid refaen¢poim'A^,then¢NortMrly abryvd Ike makerg a SouthwesmrN )a.IMre arc ho bulmlry,on the wrvewd property. To Duke-1h,Urmrrbn,DIT.rnlderrtiY LLC ane Fim Amedon THIe Nnun�Comparry: beWOe anile d 92 dunes Aii minwn yvhM1 mIU N.11,llm erne Swth—ft Q.—of[M1e SouMvresl Quarter,Seabn M ren 76 reef th—ebng A 17 dofeml�ml��—A-leh dor755 feet;Mtntt ablya IA—.58.3 fe dame Glory a 9 deQ¢31 minute wry¢mMe ryht for US katand 9TMp—,haressand-thy on Mesubkcta",art+hown mere an 8 MMkap p—n,sbNs,ane Shoeare 461 I.—pmkhy Thh IsmcerUEytMlthls map orDnt end Ibe wnwy on wnlm nIs b•¢tl wen made In mwrarr¢vdlM1 Ne 2011 Mlnwwn SMMaN OeWI Ewm.nt da:btptbntIrmnplalq tla ermesd i+M ahoxn en Ma aunty. mlh[¢•ental o1A69 perkhy fmlk, amuleemems ror ALTAIAMI lend TMe Surveys,JYNIy en H-daM adopts]by ALTA am HSPS,aM mcluee,nam 1,2,3,4,5,61x1,](.),B,9, 1116)and S3 ofTabk AHNrM.The hem wart wa,mmpk[d m OB/0.5/IOu. 15.Usemen[forbuK M1yM1wxy DuTov[,Intludlry any mcdenml rynm,m farord[M Stale dMinnhidaummalnrd In the Hnal raMFlom dame PpM 30, vl. McBmuM utNltlaz are perammblmmndlhA.—g: il-d1N—hdaydSmtembx,30u. a.omervea eymma 1959,rcwdea lune]5,1959 u Dmumem No.595610. b As Wotee for us by Gopner9ek OmUI{TkM Na.143 0 52 5 8 2 and IAIOSri91Med 0]4+/2010. Fwmwn..nd.bpearc�do ea dM the wrreyed propacy.nd.n nd+nown w the survey - Sambabk Inc I6.Tmns,wnditiow+M usermmror pub6cr+ter rruin proposes,n[+ror of the City d St.lnuk Park,as wrmimd'n tin put Gam Deed da[M Sepbmber AGopMr Smtc Om UII(GSM)rMuesl was piaatl mPJ/24/2«4 for talky bca[n m MN Ym.its utrer8mmtl Wlpy batgm,shown 8,1960,nmrtlN Selrwnber 28,1960amcumem M.6383«_ M1c.,a M.an based win bods hom dine wil'rN proNders tMt,daalN pcHofmal+bo[exa nwk dMiz reanzr 1A1'rty Usementbmaw¢en erexa+'eY. poM h,tMu hhle bw may pambiguow maps,plans,and enwlrys M Ileo d physkalbo[bn.TM Martu+F.Mmpmp T.5 mets+d.Pmrrnmbn tnrtdw Mraampne wenn mown romprbe.n firm WIMn k Me xr.,dlMrin nem¢o.,bmaome. Mlnnnw lkmv xp.noel 1_ nmM¢ver,mnWlsn on+na nreet purpmauronWned bthe UrWlram dCompletbndfolremrm[Im prviceMlrysemaNwember 3lJ, Utpny lnlomm0on snows hrrton,dam.Hamm011atbn of Mtr map lNomuOon and thoseslnbk MXlbn Met wen bcrted tlmMg the 1 1959,eecmded Mry 4,1964+slmwmem No.r638S8. urnY Mld woA The surveyor ronher ems nm worm MrttM uMergrwnd u[artks sham herew,if anY.are b the react botion a, This artifi¢tim b net die unkv wtt fraena w blue ink nxndedby tM inti Gahn masertee tum 26,196x,rcmNed December 19.1914 a pmumm[No.12283!1,wNm rcka[es•InMlm d tM1e sewer Harried altM1meF he eros¢nify that Inn an bake as a¢lsrneiy m pozsibletmm kbmadon mtlabk.The surveyor tbs rot _ phnkvNv looted[M un0elemuM utlNtks.vursum[m M5216.0 mMvo GopM1er eta¢One UII Q 1651�540W31 prlorm mY ekwmbn. vammb+rd amenhd ares."snow"on Me wr.ey 13.Tne namesdatllalnxy awmrs dpnttee lets++re zMwnmdN sur+ey. 18.Terms,mnditiow aM easement M mmmuniodon rysmm purwset n lava of Narthwmmm Bell relephme Cs+.a+nY.A,rakroined in the Usemm[ dates DRNM!I5,1967,Hendee Nosember 111967.1 Dowment No.892290. UremeM h,hown pn thefurveY. 19.Trams.mnatbm and Ahl—nt ror mmmrmk eonrymmpurpous M fawn of Narthveskm Bell Tele phone CvrpanY. —1—in Me Usemmt datN Ocmbn 35,3961,rcwme0 Nawmber]],19fi]a,Oowment No.892383. Ufemem Is+hewn an the wrvey. 2 mnehbnsmtleesemedforaanmunlcatlmsystrmpummn,InnwrdrvoMwntaneeNTelepnammmow,y,asmnmhwlMtMusemem Sheet Title 0 dame OMOer 25,196),--d 11-1 11 196 7 a3 Oowment No.891292. UMmam la xrown on M•survry. ALTA/ACS M LAND TITLE SURVEY E FEB 0 4 2065 Sheet No. Revision ` 1/3 Project No.DUK18420.01 LEGEND aXLI 11b&k •PWNU woPaL Rwww.sambatek.com _ROPa+En mRv[a ar o—F—Q sRNawr SEWER -_---sETeRcf uRE 1,11.8.1a.hilar NN 55343 m+v4 RLS aR1 �.E�EcrRlcrurcaT --0 Fwrt0 Nm5EcroX EoxCRETE SRO 1260E WN U 5 343 t)—w—�STORMSfWER 4—RESTNCTED aCCF55 jn___ ___�,,___ __ __ __ G LIGHT p--�--�NEcmIETRnuuoRR¢n wIInING UNE M.N6.60101elO— ©ILR--TP TELEPHONE PEDESTK ----------W.GCK 1 7113.476.3532 facalt1N GUYRNo aQ—�c—�Wt MfIER t-i®,4." 8twM110115 SURFKE Ew—ln01611M/YIp I PYNip I SniUNInIEI 1 I �HANWGP STILL —o.— OVERI(hO WIRE CpKRETF SURFKE I I ❑UTILITY POLE —.— CNRMIIMEFEXCF UNDSGPE SURFKE JvON -- IRONFENO: 0 Client - I aSI —.— WIRE FfNCE � DEGWWSTREE \ 1 =� WnW ENa T__ DUKE REALTY CORPORATION 1600 UTICA AVENUE SOUTH • � �� "� SUITE 250 I n I q / -� R R y -/�1 A Si.LOU13 PARK MN 55416 VICINITY MAP 1 _J/1 I . 394 Project J I W45 '00'W&49= Y WEST END- - UNDEVELOPED a 1 Ew I I I PARCELI Location \ I I�/ ��^� / � �� ST. LOUIS PARK, I1511 um,rwro MN I \ b 1 I j 3 I 4,\c 1 Certification VL DWITKW UE MILT'LT0 �' 1 T .s _ ° 1 I II I s \ 1 1 NORTH SULE IN FEET Summary 2I s,oc�PI,f I I I / I I Q I 1 1 U Eaae.wrRn W gSXEPMI= A ;I ! I � 1 11 i O ' 1 i App—d:_ Book/Pae Lowe PA- InNaI laSlxe wI Revision History NOAata By Submittal/ReVislon 1 ^ PARCEL3 M M".1 1 904. T I 1 .��. I PF li rofsrP aw mesas e —T 4q r I ' J b�� l� Sheet Title r; Ikb� I I ' 13f1j I ALTA/ACSM LAND TITLE � �J 1/ — iI '/ ' SURVEY DU(E MERLnXOro100 1 I I \ I\ PARCEL4 ,c'N.°j4 '.v4 I - -III ,v R„ I ► ' Sheet No. Revision ----IT — I I / 2/3 SEE SHEET 3 i I °T '—°—°—° { 1 ),� `®k i !I �1 8 Project No.DUK18420.01 I t I e I SEE SHEET 2 ; - —VICINITY MAP 129M WWft s Wk.Butte Boo MINemlllul,MN 66913 i Nees bt'w �l 39, ( ��6.853z�w I 1 /1 934 i 1, ' .wwTneEw ( ErcNIIIA 13unMMeIR91111F01 EmYamanW 100 Client ——I 0 1 ' i o�,o --� �y g 1 �� ( I 1 , ;SPI '' al e'� DUKE REALTY ® CORPORATION • E�I s i i I ^ 1 ! I I 3 _—_ $1 �]x¢� Y I I k' 1600 UTICA AVENUE SOUTH SUITE 250 Si.LOUIS PARK MN 55436 31 sr2X n 000z ` t f a}l.. � .lE wv uo loo s \ ( I I 4 PARCEL4 I ` till, ' s I (n ''I„f �� I � iI I � _alacswEwsaan• I ' � � 7� ill B,o+ �j ' 11-2- I % I i Project +— �- 11 0 H i i fill I I n 1 i l a _. g l i WEST END- --r y UNDEVELOPED # �d - �� q UJ' — —j= I ° ( ( I I PARCEl3, Z� �I� _i' i - ' IIII 5!�S X11 0, 1G 1 I,� = I f it ✓ I� I Location ST. LOUIS PARK, MN I o �r`I 1 C J I x11 I __ I� /r a IryI PARCEL1 i Ie � II _ — ;' Q I i 6 � ",i Lri o� o f LD S ,r'� a v ' ,I s Certification Ir'�Ir��rl 4 sil I �i 3 I � I _�rr I l `r # I i w.-0n•2 az osz. I I / I tl 11 i N5z w.D I� 'I ; I I I I h I PARCEL 2 { Summary D. d. orawn:n r1�` • l I I� I T 4 1 j .I. 'I 1 I / (:��,+IP s f +'�a/57893'05'E I vn.�:AMd:MrN IHHUIwu.d:DwwrmN N48 �rE ° i I k� - B r' 'I��'��' Ql; r I I Revision History NoMate3Y Subm¢nl/Re KIDn I / NORTH 0 40 90 %� N� i• •' �; Is •>�� SCALE IN FEET us�acubzx mrSs a-'.ands,wu r s 7 �¢ ° 7 , �.ra � aq ucr w,u auaE�rmerg vra�a]J. � fg' I {,f 'rtx occ MK 2ezasa.osen4+Bain"- z E f YAG Nuc, ��,wwaMu,tn cr>s a 588 r r® W44„q 2849 / �ti—-----� II = heet Title 7kALTA/AG SM ly LAND TITLE LEGEND .FDDNDMDNDMFNT�I ---- SURVEY �wAIERMwN -E,�EMENED„E o w.wlEo�is�as o=.�s swrtrwv sEwER --- sEiencN unE i1 / �—N—m SlDI1M 5FWFR 0.FSl0.C1F0�(LFA I -i/ ' I ��\ ®EIRTIIKMFTNI gi—N—(1 NApEOEEASELTON CONCMTENM y/ I I f I ;\.. ————� I / ym I ¢ur,Nr ®--a—�gJ Euc'rRK maxsEORMER eulurraG UNE TiHNDNFIFOFSTN --------- _-___ 9UIIMNG LRNWY Exmwc-0- -I S �NMIDIW LLEEE �..—®ovERNERDwiRE 0 amRRMous suMncr cDN[INTE wRv:Et ( I „� DE,I 1 Sheet No. Revision I 3DSo�9-2.-]S- D ' / / �— I0.ON EEND: O WIDSCABE SURFMF WC 2D 4 5 HWYYRI ICE ' ; , b AGN —�.— w1RE EEN<E UECIDWUS TREE 3 3/ I. 11 J lf� _ I r, wEN%1 EENCF (DMEER016 TIES Project No.DUK18420.01 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 lay ..-y --- UTICA AVENUE SOUTH r AIf _ AMA 9 � ❑ LOT 2-RESIDENTIAL PHASE 2��- _- ---- III L i ——__ I }� ❑ ❑ ❑I 6STORIES-SW UNITS I �� x T� 75-STL1ELSTAL.S I i I 8 F 156-UNOERGAOUNDSTALLS LNDNI PARKI pUTLQT B- o OUTLOTB- iONAmYEl _ GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET Ryrco.Ex 8 I 0 40 ao 160 EI SOUTH OFFICE NORTH OFFICE rR6MENT ' O IAL POIX/ STDILIFS-32,123 SF/STORY •I 11 STONES- AMENm AREA TOTAL353,353SF l 32,173 SF/STORY 7 1 • I 50-UNDERGROUND STALLTTOTAL 353,3535E c3 3 I 50-UNDERGROUND STALLS ;I + 'M ❑ a. - _ , n O- 1- o LOT / L 's (7 RESIDENTIAL PHASE l / EXISTING LOT 3- LSO / i I \�... jj 65TDMFs-IR9uNrrs HEALTH PARTNERS -` c — \— IST IFVEL STALLS / p' i' 19l-UNppNJ10UND STALLS 65EOMES 30UNOEAGRWND STA i gcOi ITV C T UIS PARK � 'NW � � - -- � e. NII \�\ _ /. •,� /� �a`u x 15 ARAGE }�}{� \'; "�MENMAREA/ _ �P� CENTRAL PARK WEST SITE DATA TABLE _ CURRENT PUD (2008) VS PROPOSED PUD (2015) .� D o - - "' CURRENTLY DLC RESIDENTIAL DESCRIPTION APPROVED PUD(2008) PROPOSED PUD(2015) z Ln 0 `��_ _ LILgC DRIVE�Ij OFFICE 1,110,220 SF 706,706 SF 'r a � C, HOTEL 150 ROOMS a 0 E TAE '--nWAYl o RESIDENTIAL 363 UNIT S` m 3 m DLC RESIDENTIAL PUD - 2015 R PARKING RAMP 1,360,336 SF 720,251 SF -. VENU FE SOUTH PARK SIZE 0.75 ACRES 0.87 ACRES _ — UTICA A — s ' TND To i PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC 1.883 TRIPS 1,486 TRIPS '—^^ vJ m 4 --! (( •3%OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS WILL BE DEDICATED TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING a - OFFICE#4 o I 9STORIES-30,90E SF/STORY C 1 1�' CHtlt,, I TOTAL217,SSSSF G ui OFFICE#1 ! -I I 9STORIES-30,6065F/SfORYOFFICE#Z OFFICE#3 G Y I 1 TOTAL 277,555 SF I 9STORIES-30,60E SF/STORY j — 9STORIES-MAN SF/STORY _ `J r TOTAL 277,5555E TOTAL 277.555 SF I a 4 4 r----I I I a z EXISTING j b + ' ( I i Q'� / W _ HEALTH z PARTNERS ? I CRY F ST.L I _- o Frt (!J H -- CI GSLDENVA I I I I L > J >U > z Q 169 Y H t Z ��' j z a o ISI < O O U) Q ILL Q L) -I s PARKINS GARAGE / Zd n b I w — _ a , ti -_ E DATE FES 0 4 2015 02/02/2015 PROJECT NO. 160755001 K AT HIGHWAY SHEEET NUMBER g EX. 1 APPROVED PUD - 2008 NOO'NNOH-A31WIM'MMM :3110 461+-S49-159 3NOHd SL�Z�Z��Z� HUM N V�.,/ ld ,n ♦Lt55 NW`1(Wd ISSBL9ti A9°3MJ3HJ oF p Necz 3lns'is3A 3nvusa3niNn os9z nNISVHd 11b�A^O ldllN3aIS323 aa LO tl38HN 35N3JIl NN SIN Wm O ,(7 � L 9 oda° Nw 'ellen N3GIO05add sin ol as ;LOZ 3NAVdStll MAe 1s�<Aa�wl 1S3M>QIVd WIIN30 ouaoH� _ a O N :833NI'JN3 N`JIS30 31VJ6 MVd IVUN30 O b wW LL Z QO NORTH SOD a yo a a U 0 � Y C ozOz oz a 00 00 00 z a 2 V' Z U' - Q 2 Z f Z Z F.'R<...., n F 2 Z Z W e W U w U a <w F Z < W f,aai] rc O J m ry rv>w Z >m a s> W W z a o w°' zj >z a`N>z Z 0 �� W �a0 ao W�ao �m CSI o a 9 uW NLL wLLso o LLLLso �z° br.� w ° m 50 �o 0o�0 om-o o��o C Z Oa N Z Z <y<Z GyQ z GWQ Z W y GW<Z W y <NQ Z W y 44 y F H O yNy W S d Z M1 2 d w Q S LL W Q S d W Q 2 0. U d W W N h ./lpf .Np'mLLI Np`ss OF .; y �.■ J ' ' LA- w 1 N \ C7 1 I Q \ Xx LLAz \ b'I - , C a z w �I I - I r Qa Q W 0� I w a � \\\' 00 0� El 0 ❑ 0 LU V) 15 3Q o - > _ w c� LU o N r V) Q ; 2 s; G J TFFFFF +e AD ae Y Q LL 0 � � a ^� d4 K 11 0 } N Rww.n .........v v Q m U D W _ — Y — = G) T m o n W D 1--.41 n.... st...a a s ...... n...m,....m.eNm..r m..,.,...�.�--d., .ra >o v v ...a.u.m w..mm ie. v v..e.n.....r..e v m .a�.„...,,1-a—.m.,1-.mr.. e-p-i-er-1--..e.....�.e...m�.nai e.--t 1—ft,1. N ' o L� I o 2z ZIO N � N AmA D im � tlx N O A ) ' I ) ' Ir IJ I r I LT ) r I D m Im j m s 1 / Fz- 16TH STREET . m V) m m o 0 0 k 71 7E o �m co I i '163">mommyT �yy O m OOO�Om AD m fyl y 0 O < yZal�mnvtZnm�rr-w 0t° Zy O m 'y yOyOSOOAAmm]ly9 Nm L f.7 O m m Q yDAOADZp"5aMM— ,Z> ZZ oy v C A C T W ZoomzAzoam zm$oo m D Z Z O m o Z O o C O n y m O Z D m O DmAyymlpm, D2D pN Cm,yti,yDlCry m0 y G1 T.1O1�0yrZ�Z�O;C(' y -r y F SZZm..z >mOmys D D 5 D y y D p A$$ D yyC�nTyADfli� I ZZHAS--IDAx-r O y n>Z S JpC D O D D p T AOZ-r�vyZADWOZZ O=00m mol fn mmAy2mOp Zy .p6 O� yyy�0 y ODmZ C� DmT-m P ym � z A zoy ;ao O Z�DO mm D' n- OO�Zz 00�1 j Dp yOmp> D FO 00 Z=o,> �p Z �m m Voym-tea '_� pD 1 oz c z' 0= 90_rp ZT O (1 Z. 2 A aHliION �scyio p< �z �� o Or>n OS yD T ?m Oy Op z z cn z M M rn 0 SCALE DESIGN ENGINEER: mo N CENTRAL PARK WEST CENTRAL PARK DESIGNED BY Kimley >Horn o BMW LUCAS C. PAYNE �� = z N Nn ST. LOUIS PARK/GOLDEN VALLEY, MN WEST DRAWN BY °' 1 (n N m MLS MN LICENSE NUMBER —a m Q. o DLC RESIDENTIAL CHECKED BY 46785 2550 UNI ST.PAUL,AU MTY AVE N WEST.SUM23BN A PHASE 1 PLAN WDM PHONE: 651-645-4197 DATE:02�02�2015 WM.kIMLEY-HORN.COM — x G) -n m o n m D m,..a.. .,l -.f . . ...a it. P R.—., P.P .,......this--t.,,.,. .<._,,.,....a .,.,,. , .m..d �a D..,�W,liabilit,t.. .,...d.,.�,.... N 1 0l� / zlo z c _ ( < / �ID ( m z A (( 1 / ' I / ( I ( ( (( I ( 1 (T / ^ Iy ,o S / / C / I a °' I f V i G [Ii " IT] 7, C,Cl C ---J — C }}} m ( 1 I NA� 1 �r 0 � I I D 11 0 N Z I 1 Z r I I m/om� ni<y v�n Ovyhm m 0Sr S( P O pp pOn32y32A3-Z' z cc A� m = = O < �tiA Op�A0Ac9 pm O In p o m 0 ADD Am C� T y D�mZC�O AyZ my C D C A � ZZO p02220 m� jm Z D m Z D�N�y�mmyp2 �y O O Z T m M O O T Op s�cOi j mH A tiap� y� 2 � C 0 O 7rmA m->2 ZNT my ATDp 0;Z O A Zy' _(F ^� OCZ Dp0 Z -Zj Oyp > ANG A A-D >m�ON� mmA OO� � 0� �p OArmOZ>2 m� r'WMz ? � aizopyy �Tm Q-IvZy.A Ana �< -vi o� ovp i> z V V�� yD AZ NDr�r 7 +Z yp pZZ mHlaoN �m _� �o " > a z D m m N Z m m a 0 SCALE DESIGN ENGINEER: m a;N CENTRAL PARK WEST CENTRAL PARK DESIGNED BY Kimley >Horn m op oo BMW LUCAS C. PAYNE �� = Z U N'. ST. LOUIS PARK/GOLDEN VALLEY, MN WEST DRANK BY C Ll"�' MLS MN LICENSE NUMBER AVE WEST, N m o DLC RESIDENTIAL 46785 2550 UNIVERSITYST.PAUL,MN 55114UNE 236N CHECKED 9Y PHASE 2 PLAN WDM PHONE: 651-645-4197 DATE:OZ�OZ�ZOIs WM.KIMLEY-HORN.COM W00'NdOH-A31WIN'MMM -31 V 0 L6lb-SE9-LS9 3NOHd ��/Z�/Z� WQM bUgg NW'lnVd'15 92L9t AS 03NO31HO NVld £ 3S`dHd0O w NStZ 3Lns'1s3M 3AV A115N3NNn 0552 IHIIN30IS323 0IQ z o ? M a30WNN 3ZN3011 Nry �lW m AS W" : 1S3M NIN 'A3d/ N3O />Q:JVdsino ' S Mo00 1 JNAVJ 03NAVd ) SUM Aa a3N�s3a O N a��Vd l iN3^ 1S3M>Rbd ld21N30UJOH V a33nisN3 Nss3031V06 O r0 W Z W J o o NORTH N°D > oaLLa v a 0 o�0> a v >p ¢ A'o z p x 0 sm�'oyugm`a'z� � o maw a_ox� 'maz�ugz3y a o O o z_rcmw Z y a Z J Z Z J Y-0 0pp O UO K¢LL p>Np ON u 3 m w wo Mpoo°pp,moo� wawww>o�� <� � �Y Q K p U�❑p w K ryd j Q ❑ (9 J ,lS-ZJIw--~UNZ > Q Z wLL¢ 0m OO2 0=0 p p Omo M wiq 10 O v z a w ' amgap�af a G Z iz -z zZ wp zwV)0a3 3aw'oywp¢a<�a�w>°zaY�U' Krc�O w '-wo yw V II W J o C7 w I I Z N W I I N J I I a "' II�IIIIIII o��b ! f III � b uj LA h zRig L ° 00 i r - vi _i. LU LU CD i y 1 a I �t LO st � t ' I r t t � t � t t �I� t a ¢ t glo t Nlo 00 t u � t 1 i N Q co U W IJ_ NOJ"N60H-A311N11'MMM '31 V 0 S lOZ/ZO,/ZO L6tb-Sb9-159 3NOHd WQM � � e��ss Nw'lnvd'is 92L917AB 0310311 NV-1d V 3S`dHd E w NGVZ 3Lns'1s3M 3Av Allsllwmn ossl l!/IlN3QlS321 Ol4 z o ? �' 61 annN 3SN30I1 NM s]V4 N co A9µ"v60 S3/\A NIN 'A3lld/�N3alOJ/>IHVd sino-i as oo w'r) u.,OH {</�t�' �v 3N�vd sv�n, MWeAHN3N�I63a NI Wd 1VHiN3� w /1 1S3M Jlab'd l`d2ilN3� o a`O N CL 833NION3 NOISO 31vos O b WW LL z Q O ti o 3 NORTH N°° 00 aiLL z o m yw ?�z U w a wig =O > X Q K U m a zap UFw Q F Q UO <LL000 .1016 o O ¢o¢z Q Z NZK Z O Z j JOW QRU U O K QwU Wd0 O WNy0 Qwm O O u f7Uz Zy U' Uif 2 ZLLO 4 U ro ..rc x'oSwFNLL wm > ab aNaN o o 0 w mu a W QZ UU0 ZZr�w9u ZZO w wo 3aooz ooNN i o ~ wrr >NmOo�w ux� - E .w- 0 0 Y awwr�a w�-<a z 6 00 a�a a0Uz0�iz �o3 m Z z �LL� WWozgwozr¢�o a > ¢ p u_ Z OOOUYUmU-iQ,y �a 7 'O U�-yZo 0... jjm >¢Qgmaw¢o7RNJ=301>Q wQ aU-wU�wOF¢�J¢w� loz .uNaQo =io Z zzzo W a 00w zm Qoo ?V� 17 ohga�rc I I W J 0 (7 W 1 I Z a o� '86d iit W _ co L F LAl t ev I I a f'Yt-I ni 3F z g �G LU U C '� OR' i e w t Y co N °��8 1 ' �• Igo- p. t z I � I i l4¢�¢�� > QILp��$ ooFF'' N I z rq ►� ra sl Q as °Io ! GIO ! 00 u u 1 1 M 1 ! r N .�. vi v v > v........ Q 00 U o W LL. WO3'NaOH-A31WIM MMM :31V11 L6L4 S"-199 3NOHd S��Z/��ZO WQM *tL96 NW`InVd IS Sg�g� A9 03X03HJ NV_1d S 3SVHd 0 O m NOU 311r1s Is3M 3AY ALISN3A1Nr1 0992 IVLLN3aIS32i 01a z o LO 838WNN 35N30I1 NW SlW 1S�M m A9 NM'"N° NW '.13_nVA N3a10J/>QJVd SIf101 'iS oo Ir 3NAvd sv�m 1S3M A8Vd 1VHiN30 D w UJOH<�< �� MWBA6 033/1530 �IZIb'd �`d2�1N3� o a 0 V � :2J33NM1N3 1MJK30 31VO5 0 w� w tl z U 3 i i $ NORTH N m a o i w rc v a* � v o tt o w w i z z o y Z =m m K J W y LL-J Q<a0 2 Wp O d Oym a�5 O 2^ f m 2 y 2 J a U K fz0 r�iui Q�-m H yb r_Fz Q UD O U'L-M1-m N00 w W rv.o �¢�r Ojp OLLU' O ?� wF >��w�=rcor�y W rc o HL Qymo�o��oa Rg z z o a�Q aLLLL�mui y�3 m a I v a O 7 m O0 tt<rcrcrc O a z O Z ZH " Vj zmo!wOLLm W <dx0 YYWw�?' aw W ?oC7 YGa I I W W I I Z 0 I I N LU J I I Q a a ! � �) X:,2 i '0 1 Z 3 I (, o \ a � y m kpp:� qi,��:) f ♦ z t * 1 Lu F- 00 o V) 7 77 7%LU Z71 LU u z Z s! I O _S.. .... 5 O lag- 0 rpt Q cD 0 i z P i zw� a: i > _ ! u� OW l� w 'i _. > OQA�� W / tSl�rc a co N ......1. Pu-4-""M.p .*,v L 1-11. Q m U O W U_ .QJ d0H-A31NIA A1MM SLOZ/Z0/Z0'3144 L6Lb-Sb9-LS9 3NOHd WQMtll _ LY bLLSS NW}nvd'15 C�gL(.�t AB 03NJ3HJ N`d�d 9 3St�Hd O w NB£Z 311nS'153M 3AV AlISa3�,Mn 0962 WIN30IS32i 010 O a3amN 3SN30I1 NH SIN 2 1 m A9 NMvaa 1S3M NW k3-HVA N3010J/>IHVd SIf101 •1S oo w 2 UJOH/// A�' �V ]Nd SV�m MweAe a3N�s3a AUVd lbb1N30 1SAAA N2 t/d IVd IIN3`0 n`\\/� IN �a33N19N3 N'JIS30 31VJ5 O �O WW 4 Z W J QO NORTH N°J U =o a� a 0 E a a z 3 O Qo w Z w wW O O KS Z Q O O W y Q z KJZ f7 rc u W of LL O � mU W W U O U' K aO Z W~ r O N x~x ''W^^ 2 U OJ d W W V d O IJ w 1 I Z \\ C7 1 I to N J I I a a b, T ,4 i1IL1r j``% r ,l Z�Woo iI ,1,��J4 i M` 7fo �. - —— — I LUJ co LU J If -TV, el �• a k 1 l '. 0 jj p \ • •, 111 so s 8 rL�AML I, co J a _ r'j o Ln )i s -- Fl Tll 11r lh I t ' 11f` O �/ p co r N Q m U O W W entra CENTRAL PARK WEST FINAL PUD'"` pet-d-u.]Park West �- HatDhedregiDn Hwy 100 & 1-394 - Golden Valley/St. Louis Park - MN u« '� XS?,fCs +ri- 3..+s y. `."-...,p represents areas tit Included n Feral PUD. }{ / /� s, Areas outSNle hatch will '`fm�`"jam( w amendment ma major amendm tthe Final l PUD at a later date. �-!• "y,',vtj �'"I`a l-z,.,�. �i � .�..,-ft ,7j`a. V�•, q- I r +--�l-�`. -r k �"`. ��.' d,c � � tvt�. ..�R,. a s d �1 4l} F f 1 r. 'iel...........Oraham ar.M1Ne<Is tq .4 S�z�1ji o jl \ F „� Iti x-a { �'s" T'. ',aL'4 k re soo wunlnymn^,a u ..usn F 1 I z, of L1.!i w r Ot tom! ,,,,d mi..aa..ls mI raa.saes -. �"1 w•; + i of i�t7 I.. w „, L,. P.6 1 z 3 I.9Y..s s a s 'e =� �� ¢�I].+L+��, .7 a �� Y �� ,: � � i•--3n. ,-,. ?k:... s a a.c n-c. ii '7 z5: dee ..a.11,...,.na.n.a.,.n,xc,.,,,,n Oi .q __--.�- �I� - -c,},� t. ! ;a► y x it >1 ¢.w. „ 9 h \ 1v ,,r'+1Ih +"'•. +s t" �tiX 1 ,...a n...,.l.a.... WOONER�} �. I It 1{ FF't Xl Vy t \\\\\\ PHASE 1-RESIDENT q � "'}��'�y _'� -'`-----..1:. � jl•I _- " �; s....w e 'a NE - ._- - i 'c�acs �_...� . � �+ , . L t:p {L CENI RAL PARKA PHASE PHASE 4-OFFICE.. x 1 00 PHASE 45-OFFICE r 7 PARKING STRUCTURE PROJECT TEAM UNIT MIX&SQUARE FOOTAGES SHEET INDEX Owner/Develooer. DLC RESIDENTIAL,LLC R..ns..�..i F3 FINAL P U D 21500 Bis Boulevard,Suite 402 AVenNra,FL 33180 February 2, 201 5 - - - �„'a@� Ph:612 325-9767 c..,- ,.. .-.,, ...,^. - - ..,-i Y' o t Architect: I ElnessSwson Graham Inc. 6 500 Washington Ave.South,Suite 1080 Ir1 .1 vw l.U Ir 199 SHEET z I NUMBER SHEET NAME . L f III I i Min MN 55415 a. IW ».z6r 1- 1.- ars? s6 u '4 ) Ph:612 339 5508 KIS q+ntW it lM 3915. U.2. 38 PHASE 5-OFFICE f / F%:612 339-5382 - ENERAL nwRrwnoN ff-- t .{ :O..rW !91}h Alia f4:aa se Tt.t TITLE SHEET n.Ir is 1 Ienei. .n:tr! l9,ti6 19.1'A Sa a, I, OBIL INAL ISSUE 7{ { Civil B Larldswce: Kimley Horn and Associates . ..�.-.er iE ses l3ui ws vne+ it FINAL PUD 2550Unrversiry Ave West,Suite 238N it9IIr] 701.+1 Np Ai U.ns 114 ]>e o.l WWAT VE 1' I SL Paul,MN 55114 AEVIS IO NS A]b o.2 CONCEPTIIAL RENDERNOS E%ISTNEW-CPOSED Ph:651-6654197 -yT 0.3 CONCEPTDALRENDERINGS-ECEDENT CENTPAL A0.5 CONCEMALRENDERINOS.PRECEDENT-DTCAENHANCFMEM N.. Des[.IP.I.. Date Contractor DLC RESIDENTIAL,LLC ume p.,.LwsmN Sxrn,,,.ry A0.5 CDNCEPNAL RENDERINGS.PRECEDENT PAW1WF _ I 21500 Biscayne Boulevard,Suite 402 t-e -Akyr.• 14R 1 N MN Ile 2 Be DEN 3 aN 8ed. Vn+, 0.8 CONCEPTUAL RENDERINGS.PRECEDENT PAW1W MMP ?-- A0.7 CONCEPTUAL RENDERINGS+PRECEDENT LOWY Ph:612-3 FL 33180 iF7 0.8 CONLEPTUALflENDEflINGS+PRECEDENT AMENIttTERRACE Ph:612-325.9767 , 4 y 1 5 :] A2.8 PNASEI-RESIDE VZA:R-ERNGS.CODE PIAN SITE DIAGRAM to 2 5 ]a f 73 1 1 50 N 0.10 A0.5E2-RESIDEN A RENDERNGS+CODEPUN VBA' V1 Structural Enoineer: Meyer Bergman Johnson teel i 6 1 12 i 2 SN 3d 1 A10 PHI'LEVEL P1 PUN 510 Marquette Avenue South,Suite 900 tevel a 6: 14 to t it t i 56 1.PHt AI I PH1-LEVEL 1 PLW Minneapolis,MN 55402 aver S 1r i 2 Sb Pm AI.2 PHI.L-2- Ph: EEL 2 PUN Ph:612-338-0713 - R1I Ala PHt-LEVEL33 PLAN PROJECT LOCATION Fz:612-337-5325 74 i 71 9 t 4 PHI ALA PHI 10P ELEVATIONS i„re i6 SO 36 9 9 vl] RII AIA E%TERIOR ELEVATIONS 3A Si SNk 5!. Sk -'.I E% 073 ELEVATIONS -Ms EUERIOR ELEVATIONS PW A10 P112-LEVELPI PLAN 1.A1.1 PH2-LEVELI PIAN .. .}4 •-nom -•^� Ta.wMxwIMWlM+t tr. PN2 A1.2 PH2.LEVEL 2 PUN .A1.3 PH2 LEVEL 3-5 PUN rte,,, rti PW A1A P.-LEVEL6 PLAN fN PH2-1 EM WIR 14521 ELEVATIONS.ELEVATIONS Z.1,T xnx... 1 � / Q �' r LL... j ..• ^- .4310 tS] PH2 A33 IEXTERIOR ELEVAInONS ESC ESG '"tel _ _ ue.. _ .: a ..,L✓. vrr se,u u m> Il- I: } } � r ,.... •�_^. v.x. ' �.. 7 A6 r.tl.^.W )"Vol 3]604 176:» 4' ..sKb,�..r^ -..- in 6 r.rd.�I+N 311.1 NIII ?a ML* 11 u.i. ._..... +..w ar a,:...,�..lra�n...aa,.zm.e� 1641u arw_ I]]an2 zw6as I6a xss �;.'m"" *�`.•'"+'•w•7'?.. �'��.. 1 1 - #t Mrd :k I c (r..yN.r. 1 __,_ .. - ,mM bkme i s0. tPRNVOmeAaJ6N sN bat �{ FEB 0 IVB wn I i L 15 5' :] 1.1 �- - _ to • Central Park West Phase 162 4 13 `rnld s u a s T ds 3) + Vy¢ ) �Ilw.yla aw.. aVN1 S tr t 9 1 46 1 B r at ii 1 _. w r � •`-:+► 1 a � •. I - �._..Y 1lY116 S {t 1_ _ ` rag ri r>a tII a6 it rdt ts+ TITLE SHT1 .1 EE'T VicinitSite Location % 16k 3^ IW 14k !.. 1 7 1 •1 y Central Park West Phase 1&2 DLC auleemul DLC Kimley Morn I Future Future Future Phase 4-5-Office Future Phase 3-Hotel Phase 2- Residential Phase 1 -Residential Phase 4-Office Parking Structure Phase 5-Office w<naan Praham err bite rti (Located behind Phase 2 in this view) soa waanlnoron a ash m mn<,robz m ,<ssatz I o.s i z is ch r Ir �— a .. .. .... i aaMwaaseykkYYW r r -d ka . ...... 1k.0 0� �0 JG �CQa [rnhil Park WnT•lint PUD GO •,E=,;,r,s 1115 f,.M"s'.r y mN Archit*dural Design Groan and Sustainable features Signage '� Thr detiyz andpxementof a.gna fgrel<i.phasedthe pro+ert wM 6e rarehalty<omidned Phar• Neakknbala b'^p Phots land 2.Iht Ruse t+MJbuMinkuwdlralwesrry hnSh RwNN. • The key>usuhsaf<tdy flnketp MtM OfC trubaE ParR tk'ex prpjeelaahe src.tivn of+ uRn+de. The Final herPUDtAtInPailuge ifMtrates UVit DaveACtnbai pork West klaakr ossafPNua L2,3.4 • tresrMndalaprnpounq 15ddot p;wpr,aM Phavlrn.drnn+lk popu.ng i-0J ofd f S),iMRewst atthh MtrJ for PUbJPbtA nnos+r.re - rhatr,xna*ir+mth the Seisms P>rf ArrhiV<hwa{Gulklmev uM bP.fa pr,kutnlnaMt+an+ttr:and ranmurvsy stat alkrws!esade+KuwkYe.wk,xd par wnnmet IaP pprovah res Ptoses lard tlonny, drveksan+ntvam wJl wtrk rlpWa•sstl+fhrcrura ot5t low+Park and GrEdrn Valkytacntta writ este or ..1-1, As,t,nnalydnthr parA+yl UM tlepndnrcr un dacrya M+,reiwb. wy{«paery uhiyato eautanKa n +nS and ar,ns mM drs+Enrd a,gwkr paskaYr tlutromtYtmrnh tM 4e rbpnrnt ardiasanhar r:;tug,les Wr hokf Rkundentood tiN tlrr tw00%we huddMgs,theP+hint ata,actae mdthr blM and asaoriated m sh•rrrtWrntia[Iw.lbnq laMJarrrcMnNwatad,kseldresduhmat thn pontes uhuppn;.TvdruvtinpmmtrramearwnmdtNto drt unLMaMr deugnpuw..pt<s mfartedm dka buildnRaaM pxlrrg tar,kty w<14drtnm.ned ata Meer dart t+Mxapb.(wk1 be[ba'ai livai appmwk Mmodt a maprameMmer,tm the Prul PUD at a E•kr date are arNrng taut pErO apprw+h kx Meu tap 6uldmgs —CPE <.pmRNwn•..r pan. m qhr St,1-6 Part acrdG kI Vaarythe opporkmity m r,,ewthaMrt,ik"the dgnortfio6uddi.ghNvst„uagra drugnxs<Mtx.owaddbtk nd M,baditcnatre•glsbwrUad .ntknt.yt<^n<uKnE+' twet rrMwrd dr Rooftop MaCttnAH—rats MYrtenh. S Vrx p•!rd<1a ,Y,aWdnntd<s able tTnr lard?Pasatmewl heatinRaMt thnrrn tu&f wet trine .kn,.N,h.,h qu•i,IY itdlub .arviM<uk P+tarn•r.�m arvl Prrstrvabpcdl fol e✓rtsees. �+rS+Ystans<^kh Ptvwlyd inexhrmiti5ee elevatwei FINAL PUD '.� Overall Key Site Design and Public Benefits:Principles and PurposeCb4,kdrevd.mut atp<atrswd-k,*hnh+gwkN+Pblrs.brrl,asr,Mron»ban. , Thhpft)ert wan fratb,eeber.et of peen elements=kw,p —V—,,,r1dr .T— MmrmrmrdsanrraEraapn,rm...<r,try thrrwrdar,xd rrunmon<Pxn..nu tl b<.Kdon rR< • MrM1Use[eah aMdranzrMq,nMxY,p<r1esV,anerrnrrd m�rd,l>e dnckzsa,xnt,sart W./r otK•w npu6lk Nuces< rur;r•v+vru on siM mans mem prth.—A,este .run , r YVHrdrn+a xd r<r« r4 f p nhar a.imwaa+tts .:a+r. R. 1R;s err aw• wrrn.rkay February 2, 201 5 rRrmirrdlkr++wrs atWMl[M pi,,rpdca<wr riram>M brsirvasmntn,tub room and .ui -f.!•rXdr<iSn Pvpaam. rmMa' tkrhhr+s rramKfedw proltKNrr.autdnor hrrxe xrx wain aahanas.Me . rvd&Smtarnablea�a Features:, A<sMar•» • R,,h'—fre,VIP(enendan sad psrWysWaWrc RMuetive aanwntddker homlT V � �., 1 f swan pr..ewJy paces pr,--1 PUD apprw,U.r0b,ow SE,tivrsrMYr.,.e ;AuryrvabnS,n4 Rno,*,Iki.g-enaknp karrvr+ilh TkrEskihedpare prwori EnmgYeMrmrd v.xbows lint,a•dwalk 4-. q a..t.J. ty rcduaras the.Varkr,rgramp wr urn bf.'a vex rReesMwalkingaM irlma haM,rmt,N aM Nafe<l panmaaM slcvpanry sensor ttmVoh res vkrt bwMlnSbraemm �', a 5de and Pub)k lkatm PcrrdrA:;,h quality,wf—fiesaM katurn n`rkd'ni , vr,ned base,SMdkW,ernrranswrage, Ebghefs—,n he,hng,M,ppf rWum Phut Offne fhldMp,iM lup,re Plaau4a.d 5ofhet 6uiybngs wA kx,rte rNssA Iagt+efaaaMcl Fau,sy Sint appi.+.esmwatt tr.•hJl Park 2sLfl arnerY+y rc+.nr,taaa XwMnedrnWDRICIHRL ISSUE cwnrpt.aMrnlrp IED.nd nunrrxrnt lIW,rN/iae<eea tMw.Rhout Art S--.w Mzrntle>,w.hr fretum Ir,I.—Va.-oI+rr buiid,%,—intmdrd nplar.4-p-1 dks PwM w that tym uvt kdhdwkycanhdkd,nd Yn 6 beatn+S+M caolvrg l�IRa k•P .d ErI—Amrmey wi'M—p<sbreryr'�gr ane UrdxaW'er,WrH kEYIs to bs '. and cwxepl maY be arpaxd;we uMentaM that M.e delads of the dare Lvahffing deign law Irpvv pwmbnR IMutn w rMuae water seagr 1Lfn•nl<.E prdrstlran;itlr hwrrdly urrr+s.cnJrbxdk ia„km aM amm•t,U,,xes esti lx apprand,,lM tuiurea+partaf A maim annMment to,itrine PUD gar d l aw l mnaai Mon.r.k,"XI,-1.64xemsUts nk pamh,—f—tMgv o. Dezcrlorron D.Ir 1'n.1wa M•:ay oa p,abi a r.Nkf • WtVR Phase P-1%Sbbiban.71.More Ph-4-15 parl.g Sri----11 kfra-,1 A md<a,petoq • ASwr Mable Rede lbrnnent NiedelCre+haobant mottl us<Rngram tmfudinq up In m:,trula was tfr(xdrtr n'Yalkr{urirltshnefwef a+Ananz,M nb(donnadv oAwl,N [tnbw.,mi,rrk chxynq•n paM1a,rg areas /'r..•yixluxrh c,¢4rvrqur 3b1 RludenEut urnb aM upbI5041otN,owns w-4e.nf We um1—ol nut the drtJ—tfhr pa,kin{sburtut e,r114 apgo•<d n nh fie— Conv<mrnlboyk--ar.,J d"trd skaa5ernwns • Gokern Valley Prdeabbnfafb Gelineay(rr,tra,.r/w Goklrn Vadry tMwgh ane<hmrrn of —t ma Mment to the PUO It tprane TD d 10v,r nXa a bvJdm,. mrr.mnai nark ween nal naAconrre<ron frahnmg nu xtt Pte ertof dv Mhpbtee parkrny anurlureh avant mbunt<the raw E<htdN I,xk JesahWPens hdn lir vifwlantixa»V[bbgkl uuild by d,e maafnt(•/01,4 and•1 InnOVati—Storm Water Management Eahmaar Grersutg 'r,..*I MghwaY 100 I—E,hetes+r 1.fr,—.,.rarur•ot n•n 1~,yaaM,s,r+ .n wabY man.,yYment sysfrm that ynR mnytRr Erty FOJ Specsri thhatttzual.SrKn w,axeresting vnR be prwded al Wt ylMJY wa.oskn V+lbti important wises quality rr quiretnenkoa the I`n,<a and K'abrttn•6 Osb+e, IYra)rattr[grM<xrrtni and+n MerNr,t Ex+drf at ptopoud prrtmaaM W:WnSf neManre»renew test c4ssA materuts. • iter rnw.mpa<+Vratmrnt hen wdllorwuofa<antes.atvin rd iN,Mabrm,drk•nen.and I UM Cyde and Affordable Noosing CmMul plxtmerd uE ehr gopmed paM'm5fx,uNand nauvviy Mr,dx.aped nK buner,iong mtenG+n txaein that wile rutted threat inch volume rcdu[ban xd pre.rn<n poi three.,t MA, 4f hvnwr<feaKa Wne,hem tAe he<way. • artenuatiun repVremenls. • unk lMN.M dvr,k'”D1e1Grgs,,tw,a+atwe ah.h taa>:tdoM brei and"4*,,t 1Rs•paA q.VucWld vment alxrq Nr heKrav Kakuwrld+hroveraR stepped RdW ammmyrW+aamnrm Ox•resxkaRi.st Wktn.gvwil tlrn•.bM as'yKnrryh amsbureN amerobec wAttxf<rha<rta.....f.krmRin sindir 1-1,a•amr4 in 51 tW Park rialtkn inax«ts PP <h rb rnnamue th, gn•i,mpxt W the.1ke 2mwe—rwi.to the and w•M pawrssM w•II tr M,vAY ptantnt Pundfhmr R,yr roar areM w,a eK harrNedm an Walley braEudmgrmpty ne1-1 fawaea xd 1441—h. Snu�rw3s.bcvMmd wwn&w d.Henn aM uta,"d m imgah taw RA and p irk,arra+;aM storm wain o dr • AIR>rdablr Unl4.TM rrsde neat b.nkkne,aw,t ora<dr 3svanadabE,units at M AM!!AYnay • ii —ea Phan Flout lrr+N'we Rut llwtei.1i Who,,YnY hgth q.,hw.Imwnuhm wdI>r atkpwVdnan YMer4reNM shim<idmb'r ty]tl'w lh'n w•R far ahwrdtq mNtwh 214521 nmddy,ner•nr; .*ss ..rthat.cwnp)rn aithFt+r St loon NA Arch.hv:hNafrWki,imrs +nm the--W,�kwh�the—,fl—dkthargrs en rhe m,mniralittrm r vast,.,,�ivna Itrl tutw<tauSr haVd dr>NnnaPMu trrpet ailM pant sufMetitwrand<MvteW Arises!rer—fora,pmnt+•Wo—Apa:J wklsr<.r a......faMwdble q,bia—N msYbraPProvr,f.nnwdnstaod+hat lhehMidatxhdthe hoW rkugn wkl hr aRxovM an NmraaruV hppwtur.Ayr.paM ehateh•watrr.sVw<td u4 dv sWm.watt,troarnvnt biles. E5G ESG 'i in the wrsue as part M a mapr,mYndmrn+to dh i,nal PUD I I I Central Park West Phase 1&2 NARRATIVE A 0.1 �- Central Park West Phase 1&2 DLC Residential r^^ D t.E. Kimsey#Horn � else n graham rch¢ests Soo was hlnpton a u[h —.1-Polis minnsa1ae 55415 P1 2 3 39 5 S D p y ww.esoa ch. T .e F COQ` O� _ i DEVELOPED SITE �co G� r tiw- -.� It�ii�l�� "'4gyr". .' �� FINAL PLID February 2, 201 5 - _.:�.- _ ....a►,,.... �� .� � �'�' ,�•,� � i�I��f ilk � �lM+ ,�""t�A,m ,! 4- , y OIIIGINAL ISTUE: nz,zis F .. ..S..e._ _:._ � .: �;+.� 4� '4a �"'+•w alp*4s,�dP ....: ^, q'a. 0.FV IS IO NS r ..r ,r feyle " ..✓"�"� o. Description Date c -ft i 14521 - *` . y s o Central Park West Phase 1&2 .. - CONCEPTUAL RENDERINGS- EXISTING&PROPOSED A 0.2 EXISTING SITE JIM -.. .. � .. 'all eSG Of MM&I ', � `r .�» Tar` f ,.k;, r' • �.:.r � '�.�. i x • r. too I Post � t }. .> ,. .. a..�' .,. - ""` — e • s' h ■■ I 'ni #s � i■ ' . 11 � �'�,�� :moo , _ml�ii _.r. list cx ,. s t • „ .... �" is tw. . .� I p.r ■ a. at t!,. A t,oN, k ; r ' �r �s 1 Central Park West Phase 1&2 oLc R.enl.r".I 7 ULC Kimsey lMorn I a ?}� 1jt•.r faint Ri i t' x spo w.,ni.p<o. R a .. . .1.1. .r 3 z 9 S c o m ��aaa f6� ° arR .......................<.r... tie is IWO af r f x • ,� • J p� f a w I PUD 1 Y FINAL A g February 2, 201 5 i T j �" :r 3. •gt- - "st'�} ORIGINAL ISSUE: i ..r f ,,_• I i ii... - t � •L' aEviswns EM �y�faF�3i t� j � o. oaanpno. o,r. x �� • si'' � 4 `�i a�Y.'.c"bd� r�.S�y� 'fir * j ..�• �• ,11 a ,<Y; �@'.. : 214521 x - f d m. i — _ t t f , , ESG ESG :. arr at J♦ Central Park West Phase 162 J Y .;.{ � � .rte►.. UTICA STREETSCAPE DESIGN PERSPECTIVES PRECEDENT IMAGES CONCEPTUAL RENDERINGS. PRECEDENT-UTICA ENHANCEMENT UTICA RECONSTRUCTION A 0.4 rl'm �'ll� (� 1■■�q '�'� .. `�'``� •.� � ; •,. � It eSG low R . lane long 14 ..... __ .�N QUO �+ s M w = mow— s , , s .p i p r[ k- ��m y -vf Owl J11 00 win 111 P, If A- �, � � ■■ � .f Its �� . �-� �,. _ � - � Mt. ;, _ - _ �_.... ._._.. - �� ro .WO 3 „ 1 . P n i ��" Central Park West Phase 1&2 DLC Residential CONCEPTUAL DESIGN PERSPECTIVES • DLC Allianz Ramp 1 .: Kimley#Horn h . ffiffi awlonu,rmmn..nla�ssats a 9 c h 5 S o m �� R Yt �� ' •G FLU �t" s^enueea(hv me1or,uneeemr Jneu�,usenn�nn �' -- - �� e unJer�rpe 4=,uru we s.a eeclvmne.o�. r T � r• i F a = G r� KI Colonnade Ramp FINAL PUD rua Y 2 2O 1 5_ _ Feb rre t jx... ORMINALISSUE' t Eiltlt+Pi/ �"a REVISIONS 1r+Ur�•., fi.PuS a. Dezcrlp O"n Date jS k3'iry � r � S t. }i t•fie t "1r * 'l r i a: 214521 ESG ESG lil .d. ' Lilac Drive j Buffer new development from the visual and acoustic blight caused by the massive (+/ 30'high and+/-400'wide) Highway 100 concrete freeway through careful placement of the proposed ��"~— v y' Central Park West Phase 162 parking facility and heavily landscaped tree buffer along Lilac Drive, on the east edge south of the GOLDEN VALLEY PARKING RAMP PRECEDENTS GREEN WALL PRECEDENT IMAGES Gateway CONCEPTUAL RENDERINGS+ FINAL PARKING STRUCTURE DESIGN WILL BE APPROVED THROUGH A MAJOR AMENDMENT TO THE FINAL PUD AT A FUTURE DATE PRECEDENT-PARKING RAMP PARKING STRUCTURE/ GOLDEN VALLEY PED/BIKE LINK A 0.6 eSG 19,1!ITS "Pi { frig T l a NOWe h _r _. - MM Sal Ll an _ r ,.,. Central Park West Phe 1&2 DLC 0.e,asIdential l DLC �r I � Kimley:))Horn k t a . h M1 - � Y' _ e nesz swe nson qra am arc tecls t p „�;,ti:-(� ,'•g 1 m 6 1 2lisgm taa SS 4ggJt5 f q n < z 3 3 9f s s e v .w Y� m � , M1 r „ 1 - i 3 , - a i t I , .. 1 F PHASE 1 AMENITY TERRACE PERSPECTIVE 0 _ - ----------------------- i FINAL PUD F e b r u a Y 2, 201 5 „i ORIGINALISSUE: ar,nt.,s r z _ x a oescrloNon Date i i S n ^-- r N , . 5 , a r 1 r ' 1 r - ! , JOE 214521 1 t EllESG t i yi } i i -00 r „ <' {� - - "'•- -„. •�. ( z .. * •Ly' _ Central Park West Phase 1 • .11II1�1�tt3tsaf.,.- --,....�.-"'--._... � � � 'Y..�.. .. � ':.,- __.,....I � _. � ,. �1,.-`.:', /i• 62 PHASE 2 AMENITY TERRACE PERSPECTIVE PRECEDENT IMAGES CONCEPTUAL RENDERINGS PRECEDENT-AMENITY TERRACE S PHASE 1 & 2 - RESIDENTIAL AMENITY TERRACEA 0.8 CentralPark West Phase 1&2 DLC Reside ntlal [9LG Kimsey i Hua n I p •x; __. eness s+rensan9 am arc soects • � ,J/1�+, y4ry�1 SDD washinato nn as a uth TY Y�, PiQ eta D=11s3 the sat] SSele I 1` i , �.� �t ,..... .e , ..., ' _ s^e,ar<r`nv n.o•u1ne•.emr euu.,wre...w,. r 1 w C E ^ 4 l.ay d r5 • ..fit y;.i 1 � � F.y} _ :hr% :# IlYIF�i t'.•tky" ,vp _��_ �, V `k, r}.� � 1@y ET•aF, %r•„u .�S,a=.•,•..,1 ,E `; f.. ��>a�T A • "'M- J tip, , . a --- I DESIGN PERSPECTIVES PHASE 1 - BUILDING CODE ANALYSIS i FINAL PUD February 2, 201 5 WEST FM.PHA%ICOEIE WIMMARY ^•pw.R+nv':z.:(•a.c a>, eorwrveepntYM ltlB ,. 0...sr.. +a•q .v m',N v,.M: =v„ lh,Iaro,H.,_'_ •era zaoe•a:: da,n.-r•r .a a.3r..v a,-.-oeec]s E�r.awmn ,,,,,,,,.n..«.�+mow y...- -.. a,.-...:>'<,-a n ' e,+w_ a..r ,>:ewx,..,r aJ F.Ln.rPa•. A„�+ :.;,- -.unm:k:••a-r,..w, x.,rs.a ... r ,ra s.: c, �.,•. Sala D.+"'"'"`T .:.ya vra•*Y WV .ale'[<aK:r. u.:y lr,M w g•adr ar rra_c+[e•4 a+r.Y <rH yWalc 4 ^+�s+ro acax�. ... v..-n...+ , +:sa .•,a^r s.U erwmA�a=Ma•+n anus y &s,"q W#. r- 4M.b>''9 wa„ 'F.]R• JAY1 xuY ..,rar..•sY.eU V>r,rN:c+d »rtm..>*. tlnih+:•1•yci •qt�t BC'.Gc} rsr” V•'•: .••"tea"' •ar Yrresm�n iM✓[ An"<'vY ORIGINALISSUE: .....••..ven.r.+ ue.•w. �.vaT�;.......+w.yr-AJ u..w M,w,ow.,a.r.. �],:,.a,•t o-xT '.a. +<q, -u Ee..,w u:tr �.R....wa 4eae•n � at.ae.+s � R1.r.:..E•: ,b, ,bel.�,.yc �tJY � to-d vaaeaga,rgs ban Ur�v+ JV A:v.wG..w,•ud.ep:.,uxn -.wa.a Vr•eq..VY^•Va•U.dr,; e*e •tiY v G :: Vacm.,,r. 3 r • .�]'JF REVISIONS r9t 40. Cetr @ Oy G' ,..+,•>♦ :,i> A a> aee'aun tafe.i n a..M>•._ h. wpa' n 6r,.ur , A i r 9... 8 cn rt M ex nr a rx+4ev u .r c - n . .,+r r a>.I�,1. •wa,a>r.Y.a-.d q „,., �.«:,a„ _a,L««,. u. 7C 5u Fea+a C.2r ¢:,N A M•.rr..ad +! -s ai 0 1 TY eta 4 .... Y .. - J$A I.V L=Y r}st•';JfalY'� No. Deserlp tion Dat ?%1tM Mn -h E'+mnnrr lYll -A I..w W...a w.+ 4.-••, n a',. ,u,.ta.,w•n v..n.. a Aernth ,v<.ew+a or.,w x'urJ vsM sUa[e e.fi, z. ni n.. T.VS(,._AYS'A.•�.A:•n,MM a++hY�fv:3rp row-' rY eKt,,R n.y r"rst'4 tva4«.h YaleaCv+r[..,':Dac?e.aawir � ayvn� qn-.%a+R y[rna(.n.'Nn Wn'9 a,V.,LrM A •qx Puec Jrt:mY wum ..d�J N�r• X,:r:.a••C'+nu" arM Iv w+wuMtlr.'*u N � v.,e,ouo>*.-.•c,r l.-.ar'=,:eo- sw.ww.rw.rtrxawEnwawaR. :b.rM S+[vrwi•Y�C:.a3 A. ^.aas 'n..e•ani5� ',K - G'. .rv4T, isLJe%Jrs P,w^'..;a-cr 'S.S••c:rr,tlha•,Y+vwsJe>']J].M>[4•aroJ a..iwnmt[V r+e r nJr:-..ea,a+.+tse YA Mu b' s:e•. Gt :•MI at u.aV me:n...., rte._. m.. •fl 1,8l11�LHaWlg�lg a <.ruw.,,,,..ar mt...!. .,n..mJ.a•�sr�..a,a.. ..� Aro 9=ay.L aY:cx, J t ,w. y .,o...�.wm...awn.n »., r�.,,..a. ..a r. .eae r,e+•:r.o+v.�+,,e,.r n ,u A a r f,f An:ui+.rb fn.. .w�+.•,[. tw.Aas �w..< •+as• vwa......w> .Ie a;.[ ...- _.•. nwy titi .«. ,M•„a sr.v.Mc ..,a-a r n:JryT:'t' 1 !+}c..»..r . f. •..'S.• .M. ,cR. .ub rzea W fY.^Ja_ -f'C O?;.f/�.3J!EC,•r,gcr ew�..-.. a ..x.,.e.Y..r aun.A+n':.CeJrve. an 0 .proe r x+a,Yu yu,..r9t+ Y_rs?acw. Y+ •q..r wStvYE*-va r.,.iy i a�]'u wT., 4.2 K;S:,••w •_.r r rM•h:.roS +a and ana N.NMP'wdgn.uc+•mas^`C:.•,an[Mi,•9se-earvaat+c!e rva'F r.•rYe• 0.v.•Y':+>.[ A; A-,�r'r3au-�m aea •]a'x,+. 4f).�htlF_lt.P14115t6w PraeeR:iL'ev:'>....J,..r.e. 9u..J.q•we 55 n�gm:auwe+wndm+ sa,s+'+.a•.asn«.. ! !wn:a."..a.�n- rW.Y.•.r Mrrre+4a 31 �M•arsnwn•Yd Lr yaX¢:w2n+]a nPAtt� .ICuP'!er[;.A� )..i'U e.rr.q-.m>•'•Sawry:!.Y•l'::rp 1>rcruu•. .a' ..m'YaVn"A t.,.,•dt.:r s l'U.a � M:h t rs'.c::ca'aY rLo._' Sac.m•"N .\d. - nw+r..;. ,AOVL.,•!:Y> W +.3x•n, 1 .• .: `I •tewwYvn r;a :. .. tar ant...e'n.. :vvr.,.!rw,i:,w•n..+ Vr[+] � J .. M.n:y ss'J:.. a•R ne •anryy u : Acr[[i 4 aSn.rf W .9R' <WY Ga•W za.r,+cwvwln tshwr'V N nn - .. bbry..-m , ['P., 'a A. .•u,M.ra:e srowe!nf[-r T.r . . . . .•. •' ?.b n[w:Y anJ 91 LAa+.rar,Y E"ui . . YSi 3:. M-.. evwr '.r'f•,,,ar«.w'.eww cr •a.ra+Fn,u..rr ra t...ru."a.lu R :T'ta :.a.Y•tX yau ^7W a '^• .. MnaV ar.es.nY hwya ..aM : : eu•'N tGuna —t a te, .c reS yavX';61—anV—2 ,aul .W d S+4M JMr eYtwn r W S en pr aN V^1.♦ nrY>a.W :•4.... elwx J KJ'.d namsarae«n.a,•-won aar w*a nu .F +- 4..A r, nnrRlt a1xc52cJ Aaa e,aa.s w%a'«rc•eM•a a+r:ay t.]-ns aen W»•a.•.••.,.w::, saplw'a W rn..w.. « J` M1 'Ue[.vv r r r u••..Uv ea.a.,.....,.r-..... r u V eLa t aeRlRl E afrM} ...0 F'r..,� ,[ b 1 MY•:a ew srya., i roe cn,.n r^aw as •ra,.:J.:nx,.+a.xnmenm aet !� � ^A•. 63T. D J w•a ,.s.rt.W.t+. '.,, P Y,yC i .q. ). ^n,.w. R'.: sry Or. xwf- 4 .m,rsy l ..J .ay.: ".uR[+..,-...:.::,ar rognf+.w e+r»�E W r, r.Y P.Yr q crYaa^• y _5s4n a ar,w•-a.W R bf+'Y�¢ N.vea!+. — r a ••ywa.> ESG ESG a,lr. ,m,.c.a c:x,,..,., v.. ,l.w ^r f. r..,:.. ..+..., n•a. . a< na>.>... >....w -.r'x.• - �'vwa[ �.. ;r[,•�,w=, tT `sT'„.�^Y«,.,y«»•.,..e,w•v•,.waee..-a.r.^••n...r w..r.as vs+.ae.nwaer.ozr,r TS EIartx..,,na v' Stu:Pr.•v:: v � }Av. d,it vgYsaa G,'.••r-r s„^ a rtYrt s.r.... Vau.ipQ�r�a:4-N�,. •,r i4 S.c'+a aans Ya+r•Ma[aua alumb w'9>M•mb!•'••a'+r,an)m!"w`a ,mq.rdr:w.•n.w,a•-ra>,.d r„:YF .;,r,.,J r Y..-ti.•,:*.•c.e*-��>�! '� l.lhYR.btBtRR.e«u �:,,- :.r: aAr wr.,a•, „ d->a na.., x w».<e•Wen.+:rn•r,>w-n[, .art,aann..,...,,..,�-..s:.,.,,,,•,e a,rr �. A.v,.aa ='.. .a«• � r^.L. Rro[:x Pw uT'•ari.•.�b..n•gv..n"w:x..a-'e..r[lYc axrba'n....;a,7a'a fi,.., vWr•'e.M au,e. r .�•m n: '. ,. ' T J N � 1 r b I Y'w•�naL.wM a•r>+rw e>.,^._..t» :Aa "�J- Y ♦ H+Meed * 'v �. r•. ,•[nUM. 1 r,.aJ.x.leuu Y e .w Je... ., cwn>M,ra',s_,. 'Watm.Y.i,,rt,•r.>h r+i+u n[,, M]E.-wtrr[m' t +r r:r' .yn•rea n Low. ! ...vn L�..+I:1J .a.:r,•rwA '. -•am•e rM. _Y• Ktlr..a*,[+n aa::•af T"YX:q 4, : L+nLY �.>rc 1 . u a Nrans of Eruwsaa Wctott uaer +u M v+.r..v9 r>+fe.a �xH� Mn,mrv• y: ^y ,�u, ..«zY e - ., va irva:...er» .ur Je 'fS. L ,.., .. V� a-'r +w o-d ... . rf.'A.,,Mti:nW fX+?•i'(+In WP":. ,. r.f._ aeeo.vxJ^a.e,rs,Saxr V,aa,,,ro+ea•n-+aer.ar•:wzr rvl r-..Y+a•an ev.-.+: f ....._,. .•• ' •+»Iv.ty ata^•nY roxra'.mx'.G'ew r.,., yargnc vsuc..n tYJa a•Y-•sv'+ _r.,. ,„ •m[,`' .� �r Central Park West Phase 162 PHASE 1-RESIDENTIAL RENDERINGS i CODE PLAN PHASE 1 - RESIDENTIAL A 0.9 Central Park West Phase 1&2 ULC Reside ntlal jDLC Kimley*Horn [loess swensPn graham arc M1itnc is was hin RtPn a urA --P. m .155415 P. 6 1 2 3 3n9 sots 5 0 V 6 r 2 3 3 9 5 3 R 2 ' www e s g a r c A c P m >� •. " .r<tlaretlwa,ta,ma e,reutle Jm,tlrerr vurerr awn x y �t t .n un•aur,crave.v j } f ueJer rn<wx v..r r1:e sure cl,rmneva,v . - y-im• •vw Spnarure ' � � < s,vee or rr.retl came { ry ,. 1 .Y.�'3 r �.�..y. •Yk.t,_ ., ,,a .• ., {�.AE,� _� aEr li - I ;,. ., t w a n= .":_ � �.- 11-A-c:•, ..(iz%,�, M1,t,. ;a 11 �' I.11b i 't��13t'i�:.p �'i5.rt'.�..�rri'�Rli'f }}ii e TI t f z' 1r�'+' ,I,Ye 3, r _ - , I r vnviE� 10 •t`:Y 1 - - � a L" , a DESIGN PERSPECTIVES PHASE 2- BUILDING CODE ANALYSIS FINAL PUD February 2, 201 5 m$11 EIC.PHASE t CWEEUYYARY wAry'ac,rwa as.i CmRbucelan TYPRE18 .. A rYm. .a,.—xMrvaa»aao-b.vT i P 3,ea b:p0=i •M.rpa, a`vrJ».se±•Y.m ,r+rse It.. i.m iN••etf-con x+e-w•:s.+" E'axW x: w+c ax x',S(+ClJx'.Yr'ry V`a r M<YrA:vcr•IU4A�'g 4uw ta,:m:;af�aRaa mvac r+a•:+p•a-w',Y .`:,: Ii Aen t]5 }i5D s,.ai na a�b«...a i..-... ..:.Pr '. x vx-R P-rr,aro..w.Ya o.0"s•H awt.n,aMmc ,.nN.ry _ L': B •`-:3 �a50 . .. 'l'.:]C :450 ..w+s«*1'rx Nat'.>r •:,.J '.- MaDx, s-a.. +,h M taW a+,e'.myrc{y lnn:nspeY byi" s»e!@C!NY s':>a.ar ap rn-m tc YDl-^ y,r 1... t'- Auwr.4Y aiY _ ORILINAL155VE: rr. +..m r...v...r•raa aan..u`.V.mm s. r:ur rr„wa A:Awe:rw.fa4+ _r.n r<y�a;trtvvu.roa �.: ,ax,-.A l-�c:r,n HnaY4s .0 yr:r is A:, ,»,.... ., v.<.v..rrr.,.S,Er n„ ]+• a .. = w:..lr ei Aw nma,w r3 - L Vaa..n...ntlYe rlYanm rY w,..l1-aY•v.'^'%�ry REVISIONS n•.4.._er..-, -�,af.. .. Y r.,v, A, t.,.., A, 9 P '. -: +. ...7:,,rA,+•w;mS�Y: yrrc:.rsa r.vp.;Yli c«i'C 50]"'..,wrar+,uw ana aorw a. .s eu-ngevr.-,.wa.rro-,.r.,argr ti :cm,_•.�nrs„ .c...Y n.rr.rws...,oi • m..P+rq Dxv.lcr .. :w a #r.ew>Acc,•tT.mry,rny:�:ww+'M3 A.tUs 9r�•.a'm 1, No. Des cr PtlPn Dat ' nY' .Y.,e0.N'rm+O v.a•+.,nett al're aa,.::,,vn'h,i .,yw,...•'.e.r,w ax.<..«rr>..<m=I ..:...oar RE..Preeauws .w.w., _ n a w e.t -w.< r w A.raraN.�•a:r Ae p'.aus,i la' -a n'a•k+ ..mv'a-wbfa�q nx,"+yryr yay.n..,.-5•,t•W«n..,.e„r.5 h'.. -. FRR'UL t rOa+As ut•w x<aaure..e„»r.x Lo n�r.IrJ f.rn a.s!- .. , ,ar.w R.!V,•�rv=u.•i�, Wwr,r3.n..r.cYµ>cwpa•a:vwr..,T:Jr.r:.v Y'•'�a,,. ..,ni:.T03]-:Mt..:f la wap<u.'a+.. .,:M.r9#,rss'�acsbe.Nw-T•arsF-•re.sW<,nxir vlrwa •.-b xawce t..,]y .♦ EFr.P4RwraeaNM MEwwY\YJ4 =ma e•m.n:e r ' mcglr r. ,gxays.'✓am.SDE'G I't:p M. "�.t'x..FrrY: 'acw'S:e+ev,tlP.an.y,�rN°:Y'Ji.9.An WFx.na.•n,u'.4r.w.ar svn rva.:a)-e.r...ewe 4AlMm„N.rY fiLrla[4, -.at.-r.MlAI.1 �•bu::waWe••n.,r'.a:cv*n"H.•ns»•., 1.P k,3L1aHV11cY s-4•N.n.e> t... Wh w Y �tt s,p pr.3ra -AW.t'ya rsrsrP•e .. ,,.u�.:.z.. ...i'.'!• ".»a.'«rranaaq.a v lR ran.-r Yr n ✓+uA)Ccmn✓.ti 1.rm.gJJPr s.An vaa. ap 4tiM hCn'sr4 �,' ygtpn•ryv LT r,rtd.:a.�rrga r a. «r•v.n �e0 ti1 am r4.r.• .,L. .. , t:,W....v'.-.rw cr/wy.4a .rN A 'A..!,'1 +•.'e 4w .�Tl.rt axa, r.nmr ,,.,as'rtx.nc xJt]..]rt Yrav .2:N;r}ia)•p T. t'Lwl Of! M•ihWa:'va+ann I -I'S YL.,t'i0.x: v «e+rrv'a rwn .sf-w...r... .r1 i7 ...,G MO:•.c.. Un,,...rr \ean.^.. Pwn,n0a 3m>xv^x-x,.,.prr.a x,e 1M a. al,G:.:k,ww'rnauw'..�vw*.,st .e r x, 1 Vr to -•rr Ar++Y 4 3 !< t ga'u.>.a ,J::N.' R .q 9c:r .a. 8 J -66-, A eaaf- 9 an,x-•r A. ., 0. r., e ...y, Ma I,cY An > YPa A. c,Y •L..1 Aaw h•L,r'y 4•. -mr.+i Prc.Ma:r A-WI1M WR 6F ]"Ycu 94 ab W'y A '� .<v'a• rrP 'k i .Wa.- tv.`4nJ .Arermr.uaraT hlr. a nyR-x anx, '. ' .au ...a.na r,rwr.,+.ra«r✓r••r r„ •r arup oa' . r....♦ w,rw aq.rrr .H small an♦ p4a0Y x,Yvr'AMn dse t¢9e Yp oe'r6.,'Mf Y.rd�,-,�wr?y•r „ ` .. 'M.�-�" W sa 51, r CLL rwMVaf rrc,'a ,C,Lv vnJ^:ATO.r xhrp _ _ - � ru y.. nato Dw x - a� , v x<�•,*R Ytl yl.eva�.-.nC:V., ix�pwlrurd�K"vr l rV f3a' t' SYwn+.a Ha,T• cir b:.xtl YF VA'3 ia1: �� V£La:a, A WI'.^? :-vnM z]»Mnr•3- Ml'N. e+ f Y.Ju. P:rel, 9 y.�a xjm...um.rexrarcw a••v.rr",t RGOnsartraasi H s -,eYn-: rw 11d M _.�. Ytlss:aCt h+S,t..r a-a.n':a«. Px na.r r<+,..s Mvr.„ea.o-, ,14521 Y .1Llrt�3EOA� aP,r z: u r yarr.q ya'xp-r��a .,r_.a av-RPh v-.r,e 1•x! .vad ,-r Yxwcsae,,.,...r.v r W... ,a,+Paa,,vaa,W .. •c++..rws.mna':nx.au^,w vm^w:h.a,-..oa,m,tw.trwf rrt.prvap_ i ^ r•w i.4Pr"u•• -..t '... ss.-r ani a.'.'yr °' .+•» r, -o•a �:r a r.rr ro re« r..q-. , ,I. .. W •i Sy-e• rYaxaa n; r ran.w..+'»r a., v.v-r E5L ESL r, ., Pm rq Ab"Vrx-p wWa:a •....c,. ,.,,.r. to r w- as .. a ,v. a r� t.r,..Ya.,.t a.,,, ,.r ,.>...,•, ,-.,.,ans.,s„n�w�x,n..aTra..r-:v, Yr<M tw -N: WPe.Aa xr:gxeN vxr»a Yer 'T.vp .2r;.•,.V.J :, .u4r Ia.x>.. ,.....WYa w b yL. vvrnary l<'R'a rvm. 13, a[,rtav ' L Wkr 4On,.a i<+.trt.w Y v• J -^9a G't r ., asyxRrlaa«'r ♦ry is E}twEen:-t,wJm 3; 'sM.�r+•aW rmt,'-a„s x`x twanx.n.✓•e'.Avus..rw Vr<P.irrC%•4,Y": :+ Ta kl .kFm•^-w.x4rr'+c..'a , sn VC15KrVcv,:�`.Jt'n'' ')'IW .a,u<Ia aua. r..mxr rr'=� Cwe. e+re,.a A. w•«w. a ami«A c:.Y,r2,tWit.�MYae �.3a w. ,.,,,e,^rt,n..t.n,•,. c•.,-,,. w. f ... � -.. ., .. a.x..a, as n J..,rm.Y,.,n au, .x«Y r_.Pr�.r,r..a .«•,x.r„.h» .,✓,,:a. �.-„yrt-s rror. ,w�°t ro zc;l ...xY'+Y,.;.w'«v.,3„..Mra,....»w..,y,,.r 4 ,ry A ag' 1+aaC- '1 ,ry.p YNxc. mapwa.r rm,k 1,Y Y �rn'9 'GOJA. aruw N-.,-. T.'.S•'t ,w'A,w..:4h r'.vfr.l'?ryXrl ML 'mn.Yn.o.w, nslm•w1+YW tt�",an..:rlry,•,o.,n o.Vrvc,n rrN nrs•a � ."`s a5•.mWf:.T�r. U:`vewvv.. .:.ffanrP':^..i,as.rvm,r 4µerrl - '<”" Central Park West Phase 1&2 I PHASE 2-ftE51D EN TIAL PHASE 2 - RESIDENTIAL RENDERINGS+CODE PLAN � � A o.10 Central Park West Phase 1&2 DLC Kimley*Hom <I.a<,nxn<e.xraM1as ar<M1lr«rr fBx�.sM1lax re• a S S aY15 >1.Pne�M1erif 31l<f S S x xsss sxx .� • \ 17 1 1 M :r k 1 a I nsno w q �..- C G I n y .e-o-t saa� S I P�4 a k n y F O a � 1 FINAL PUD February 2, 2015 k I �«no«c PoorPnxr.ewo �. e*�i`e°ia x-x'"' I s.a I «•o- s.r «m a o a r G. G. �.. .. _. _.� D... .. .. .. .... p ... ..... J v I i I 1 I I oaalM1eussus. an vx�s ,� mz ssw.e ssrr.wlsrwmss.<.vn p I I. - I n —61ons / is I Waffir IJ I I Akch I 1 I ` a .._.._... 214521 �1 PH1 LEVEL P1 ESG ESG .y �b a- � � .-s • Central Park Wes[Phase 1b2 _ MAR 2 0 2015 PH I-LEVEL 11 1- ` ext P H l Al .0 �R/� Central Park West Phase 1&2 DLC Kimley*Hom m ................ f00 nssFinf ten s J T A % L-j FI; CIO cm T- "' "I JEl 13 E 13 c Cl FINAL PUD February 2 2015 A Y" 11111ID1111111111 Za I I "NIP 1'19,m 9,11 Is MIONS FYI F� .a a —0, AM 214S21 L1 ESC ESC ir t Central Palk West Phase 1&2 MAR 2 0 2015 PHI-LEVEL I PLAN PHI A1 .1 Central Park West Phase 1&2 DLC Residential ULC Kimley�4j0:rj I i elness srenson graham ars hlterts S0O was hlnpten a u[h mlm a ssels - P.6 6 1 1 2 3 . 3 13 n9 su[s S O R f. . I 2 .S S 9 5 3 8 1 w w.w.e s 0 a r c h c w m ILI, I p In,e,.• D,r, 1114 1 AS. T I A BN O� AP AR J J _ ( IRR �— - ru Trash Alcove !AR !8R IAP Den IYP. E3 Erl— r rr j r r r IRR ae D.a FINAL PUD February 2, 201 5 RP Icove hove e0. I ARI o IRR AI el R3 , r ORWINAL ISSUE: at,utr is REVISIONS AmenrtYN o. Desrrlptlen Date RR _ Clubroom Cu. r C9 1� IRA IRP 1Alco R k ve U IL � I S1.Louis Park GDIDen Valley �i1 PH7 LEVEL 2 I �� maAE,S xOua[a A3 NI A3 ESG ESG Cental Park West Phase 1&2 PH 1 -LEVEL 2 PLAN PH1 Al .2 Central Park West Phase 1&2 DLC Residential O L Ca Kimiey*Horn elness sxens •sham archn«ts 500 wathinptpn uth P.In neap oils sao la SB D.6 1 E 3 3 3 9 S S 0 O a I. 1 E 3 3 B s 3 . E www e s p a r c h c p m I, ;7•\ �. (,. E. .9- II 12 is 19 I t8D-0' ZBJ-0' 12 0' 21'-0• 21'-6' 2•'-6 36-0• 98'-P 21'-0' Bf'6• I COQ, LS 1BR 18a •.a �.BR laa 1.a �eR �� wBJ 'I i GO BR - Trash 18en o EBR =0. 7•n CZ• -.V 6' 11.1 1Y-1 8I'-1• ..21.0• 21'-0' 19'-a' I.0. -. .. LL— 1 ril s. f i - E.R.')n FINAL PUD aIrFebruary 2, 201 5 2 16A b - f� n ar ie .r-r —i set•r I 1 � A9. Ik have 180. Itti, Al—, b b snot �BII A3a I ORIG INNL ISSVE: n � -. YYY I - _ RFVISID NS N, D.scrlpt— Date .R IIBR AIcO•e 11R - I "� • BR 80. BR fr „- 1 ,...r 1,11 .r , I I I 36'-8• P-0• 3T-1' 21'-8' 21'-B• 21'.0' N'-6' 1B'-1• ' 32'-6" 3Y-B - 21T-0- � St.Lpuls Park GdMn Valley 21 R[S,IVxIFr qa I A9 1 PH1 LEVEL 3 46 SI ESG ESG i Nl In6•.f'a• a.rtw Central Park West Phase 162 PHI-LEVEL 3-5 PLAN PHI A1 .3 Central Park West Phase 1&2 DLC Rezid entlal w elness Swenson graham architects SDD washinpten a Rth PZnnea Po Us Minn taa ss el p s i z .s s o es W.wfi wl 2e.3 3 9 S 3c o m spa ch. ..aana.ux t arYrr.a suu.rawin..,.r. '1� tY Lwe—Prin..x..a I I I I O� FAQ\ R �J 18810. IH3R LeP --Tn) L 1 .,.. ... Trash - .. r ` 1 Al. <BM1 EBR I8R-Den LRR r I __ 18Ri Den k1. £L Com' flEL. (� 180. e81 D<n I LBP. Jen CC1 0.1 Al— Ico•e SBR IBR BR Al— INAL PUD i tAa I ieA - I "+r _ February 2, 201 5 I IAR. ORIGINAL tBSUE: n 3. REVISIONS SPR - I 360. - LIR Nn. Descrintlan Date r,raii,. {rfiirk.tr 280. 180. IBR B0. IR AI A--y - .•. I I I 51.Lauis vara I Gdcen vaaeY r Zaaxcs21 uuwaeM1 Al Al �PH1 LEVEL6 ESG_ ESG_ Central Park Wes[Phase 162 PH I -LEVEL 6 PLAN PHI A1.4 Central Park West E4 Phase 1&2 DLC R-d,-.1 I E7 O DLC ES ES E7 Kimley,>Horn E2 �—9 Lours PyN Gal4n VMIPy—� EXTERIOR MATERIAL KEYNOTES-PHASE I IA-1 BRICK-CCLOR Yt &I BRICNBANDBLOOC LORh el..............ham archllecrs M-1 BURNISHED BLOCN"LZ Yt SA-1 PREFETAL PAN INISHED MICRORIBBED MEL DAR-FION11COL0R 5pp was hln pton a uth SB-1 PREFINISHED RIBBED METAL PANELCOPPER PENNY COLOR minneapplis mann sptap 55115 SO1 PREFINISHED METAL PANEL-OLIVE COLOR P.6 1 3 3 3 9 5 5 a a 6A-1 ABET IAMINATI STUCCO COLOR MI www e E p i r c h c o m 6A-1 COMPOSITE wiN s i` 8A-1DECORATIVE MECHANICAL GRILLE I 1A1 ALUMINGLASSBALCONY PAa'eeels.n.e i^n<en.euM1i<u..r.�rnn 7 7 � 111A1 PREFINISHEDIBHED ALUMINUM BTOREFflONT SYSTEM W/FRITTEp PATTEFNING 811x4 PMR 1 PHASE 1 E2 SOUTH ELEVATION TOTAL SURFACE AREA 35,807 54 FL p1o0P Class I Material Coverage' 67% *pP...,m.r<....< i— —14] D`V Class I Material m E pbtl em re l Pm91 g) 1 Class It Material Coverage 33% 1 Class III Material Coverage 0% „< 1 161 4 1 1 1 150'-0 V 1 1 —1_ t90---D°-V i 161 M, IT 1 ��Q l LEVEL I am 1 00.0 1 ---------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1- -�lVELa Il 1 eR'-o• 1 PHi-E2•SOUTH ELEVATION-West FINAL P U D February 2, 201 5 �GP�pm VaI��3 1 1 I ——_—___——— ——_ —_f_ — — _Ta00F ORIGINAL ISSUE: of 1 � � D 1 REVISIONS 1 P. De:�riptian Dace �———_—_ ______,_ __—————_—_—__ ( i 1e1-La 1 i 1 SEE COURTYARD S-N ELEVATION _—__————_—_—_—_—_—_—_—. 1 � � 1 LEVELa I � ———e.———————— —————_____———_ tai=7'-C1 214521 rapacr vuNHR ESC ESG LEVEL 116'-O c[r n[au b LEVEL i 1 10 O 1 b 1 _ Central Park West Phase 362 1 / '�PH1�E2•SOUTH ELEVATION-East EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS PH 1 A3 .1 I = Central Park West Phase 1&2 NOR— —A— SA-1 DECORATIVEME-1 LGRIU-E LZ —■■ __ .. _ .■ - -- ■■ - -- 11 _ ■■ _ EXTERIOR MATERIAL KEYNOTES PHASE I , TOTAL SURFACE AREA 35,967 Sq.FIL Class I Material Coverage 66% Class III Material Coverage �� ■ .. ■� .. ■ ■!� 11 ! .. ■ . Class 11 material Coverage 34% 6 __ _ ■■ _ __ Ilk• . coop M,_14-NORTH ELEVATION-East FINAL PUD February 2, 201 5 214521p Central Park West Phase I&Z 4-NORTH ELEVATION-West EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS PH1 A3 .2 Central Park West EXTERUR MATERIAL KEYNOTES-PHASE I 1A-1 eglcK-caoR rl Ea Phase 1&2 B 1.11ANDING-COLOR a2 DLC Residential AA1 eLRNISHEDBLoa-c= n SA-1 PREFINISHEDMICRORIBSEDMETALPANEL DARRBROWECOLOR 581 PREFIMSHED RIBBED METAL PANEL-COPPER PENNY COLOR s 1PREFIMSIIEDIA ALPANEL-OLIVECOLOR BRI ABET LAMINATI TAI STUCCO CMORN u-1 coMroslTE w1NDows E1 E3 U t.C fM-1 DECORATIVEMECHANICALGRILLf 10A1ALUMINUM AND GLASS BALCONY E6 11A1 PREFAISIIED ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM WI FRITTED PATTERNING ES E7 Kimlryra`\Lj^�n K e fJ 1167 s 1 PHASE 1 E1-WEST ELEVATION PHASE 1 E3-EAST ELEVATION TOTAL SURFACE AREA 11,701 Sq.FL TOTAL SURFACE AREA 11,199 Sq.FL O Class I Material Coverage' 63% (.1 CIMaterial Coverage' 65% a LaY P.M Gdbn vAllry (1-3%wreregP by Apel..I-PM,Nirgl 1-InGusea f%wverage W AEN LamMMi Panairpl Class II Material Coverage 37% Class II Material Coverage 35% Class III Material Coverage 0% Class III Material Coverage 0% elness ssre nsRn graham archness P.t 4 10R-1 s00 was hingLan avenu so V[h 7 7 .Inn aon ur m,nnaso[a ssAls P. 6 1 3 3 3 9 S s 0 a f. fi 1 3 3 s S .s s e 2 ww w <rRar<h cam 1 ROOF IS —-'— ROOFS\ — — —112 D°-V _ F ' _ —113'-b'V �em.,I.m.e•,1.'ne...ea ann.r,P...e" j I a.A 1 —LEVEL 6 61'-4 X61' 4-V 50'-O 130'-O L"`""' P•1e i 1 _ -LEVED 4 136'- 19E'-6 2l'-4 — LEVEL3 _ _ LEVEL-2/\ F9 E+YtD CtRl:.l r'A{x.K li.O —116'-O 116'-O A b 100'-O-\1 1a y pA( l 1A-t (,AY b 4s - G — — — — — — ___——— _ — — l<EDn'PO —_ — — ——___________—— _ _ _ _—___ —�VF,LP1 �s1 PH7-E1-WEST ELEVATION �a�PHt•E3-EAST ELEVATION FINAL PUD February 2, 201 5 ROOF/l _ ROOF Il ROOF ORIGINALISSVE: ox.ax,it _ _ LEVELb _ LEVELb 1 _ _ LCVELb 161'-4 161'-a 161-a REVISIONS P. DnssllPNnn Da LEVELS n V _ _ LEVEL5 150'-O 150'' O' 1S0'-O LEVELS 196'-xf-VV 30' 8-V 15S, _ _ LEVEs�S�I LEVEL3 _ _ Level- 121-eV-4'`-Vv 13l'-4 12l'-4' J Y I s sI I 2 J�1521 LEVIE -1 2 _ LEVEL3 va crvuursa 116'-O U ESG_ ESG_ t ' LEJEL,1 LEVPl1 LEVELI 100'-O'V 1G0�O`V 100-0 _ — _ _ _ LEVELPI _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ — _ _ _ _ _ LF P1- _ _ — _ _ _ _ _ _ LEVCLPI \T1-E5-COURTYARD EAST ELEVATION z PH1•E6-COURTYARDSOUTHELEVATION �i\PH1-E7-COURTYARDWESTELEVATION Central Park West Phase 1&2 1 192.1'-0- 1 A3 3'32•1'Q G9T•I'd' EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS PHI A3 .3 Central Park West ,_ Phase 1&2 DLC ' Kimley»Horn I U i 1 t t I poob RlpE�3 I`!r�ER SS OIb a.! R! [em c Nr,pr e.mh ue u.,e.u.m.... �INr,........ p � I ...Nw....N x... ' 7--- if , I I I I I I ._...—._._ _.____..}_..__. _...._ ■ ..... ._.-.. �.... -. ...._ .. .._. _._�. I. -1f7-7—. .......... - I I , , I ` I I I I 33 23 25 24 23 27 i I I ——I— J FINAL PUD I February 2,2015 I L-- I I -1 I O[IGIHAL6SUE. —1 1 i _ REV 61O x5 —_ , ——— --- , -- o. o„,nP,nn one I n n I I a 1 t a n n 1 I t ' 2I4S21 IESG Est; �1 Ph2 LEVEL P1 Central Palk West Phase 1&2 PH2-LEVEL Pl PLAN PH2 Al .0 Central Park West Phase 1&2 I I DLC Kimley»)Horn Us t '~0 _.._.. _.._. m - soa ,a I e.9 s.;s ss ore I � b , — I I ei z I I � I I I I I _ _ I I I I I cine -e I1 {)•I o , , R L 11 I , r 0 o I I as, .._._... E I D o f I �`O 19 .25 16 19 L J 25 --- �5 I s I I I j O e e Lx .'Q I O e -- — — — t ° FINAL PUD A e ,at February 2, 201 5 elb t , J -ov oucix.L ssuE. nn,ra s-2 r tl , v aavrs:o xs ......._. ._ I ........ _...._ - — D,..rintbn D r I n I r I� ESC ESC I i I �1 PF4 LEVEL 1 i Central Park West Phase 1&2 MAR 2 0 2015 t _ v PH2-LEVEL 1 PLAN �... r PH2 A1 .1 i Central Park West Phase 1&2 Reslaanrlal ---- -------- 6LC , ' Kimley )Horn 380. IaR Alcove _ L3- _____________<____ • 1 a=1.r E8A I elness swensRn graM1am arch Uecis "- Al.o.e � Soq was hingrnn a huth W. 1 _ yy I m ea pa lis min Ra SSIIS ac o m spa c . i I .vlcu r.�-i _. - II•.�<es..��nv�h,��n�.a,.um.m x., Ak— __ r�•r.�<n es m...unn<�.v ex..r,ur<iv.w, �LR .ua m,llamaauM1 <.. I P R u.ee�sR.Nxs..r me sine c.umn<,ou •— �� .. � , synaw.e d I 18R Dan - F! 1 1 RR t� F17NESi u - G Eta No ma 1 � _ I CLUBROOM � r t . .. FINAL PUD Jit February 2, 201 5 IBR ORIGINAL15SUE: al.nz.ls IRR _ '.R REVISIONS I 2 I - N.. Da..Op-n Dara Alla I 2 14S21 I — E8P 180. RR IBR 280. i C3_2 pl_2 B1=E .sEe sf `Z�'I I � ESG ESG I LEVEL 2 v e.lw• Central Park West Phase 162 PH2-LEVEL 2 PLAN PH2 A1 .2 Central Park West Phase 1&2 _ DLC Resldentlal I ' Kimley*Horn i� I 3RR AiL u' 3 - h elness sqe neon Graham arch Neats =,s.. nezptaavanuR 5south I h qAl_E 1 I R min n<a pplls min5115 L- www,Ea 3 s R 3 9 5 3co pa c h. In R , , i1R Alpova _ q AA1-z 18R - u.eu.reu Mu,ul,Ru sur.of.....,uu 1 !Ives a,Prm+ea come 'e +PN I° IBR le 'i I 18R Den eB E_E 1 :Ra t IBR-Den A F .0` O� G � J I EBR `-` J GO`a Be,_= I I I IBR.Dax — I _ 1 FINAL PUD BR _z February 2, 2015 IBP <I"e ��. w R - Ils,r I ORIGINALISSUE: ox nt,is B<E` BR BR EB0. REVISIONS I No. D.scrlpt— Date e I Alcove{ A4 I 1 I , BR BR 18P BE�2 i 0R C3C 3—E el_z fil=2r _ Sj,�r I I _ :14521 1 243. ESG+_ ESG_ �t1 IEYEL 3(45 SINN — - AB v,1r-ra Central lark West Phae•162 PH2 LEVEL 3-5 PLAN PH2 A1 .3 Central Park West Phase 1&2 DIC Resld-111 DLC Kimley -torn 36R , t IBP Ahove II BI_E iAI-2 . slne.s..........ham arshu.— Alcove - SDO was hlnpt.n avenu soutR I p - min neap.11s min n.s.tap 55415 W.w wl 2e.. 3 9 5 S o m w s9a chc Ix.r......m.roar mn en.,,r.,..n. AA— en ........e.........r,r,er,ar,..m.nw, ....r Cs—z .na mer l.n.a.h xten.es.rnn«r .- unJer.xe Nx,ui roe s.............. N2 AS. sa-sue IG ' I� - i - IBR Den 4eE E I 21P I on Den A p eau � , R G I21R IIP-Dan GO BII " I I IBP Den n lIP ` ft I FINAL PUD I IP � February 2, 201 5 I _ 13"i s� Eo 1 1 tIP Flo am ORIG INAI ISSUE: pie aeis p4_2 8P 1IP 85-t 12-t a REVISIONS a ODNCE N.. Oesulp D.n Dat. L r.. I Alto I I I 'tR IIP1BR19 EB 1 _ �9PE � I C$e2Fli r 1 21/S21 rizzA3. ESG<._PP ESG_ t LEVEL 6 II16=Iw Central Park West Phase 162 PH2-LEVEL 6 PLAN PH2 Al .4 Central Park West Phase 1&2 Dic aas manlMl 'T A� 2P" ULC Kimsey*Horn EXTERIOR MATERIAL KEYNOTES-PHASE II - - - 1ii'-e'V 1A-2 SRICN-COLOR e1 _ 162 BRICN-COLOR#T aee I 2A-2 STONE OR CAST 262 STONEORS PANEL.IRE `; .. SA Neel W2 PREF N SHED METAL PANEL COLOR el - _ - - T-' - • 662 PREFNISHED METAL PANEL COLOLOR A r SC 2 PREFIN SHED METAL CORNICE 01_OF e2 ,.�. �- I SE PRFINISHEDMETAL CPNOPY-LORAN tS I /�� 6E2 PREFNSHED METAL SPAIDREI/RINJSOM PANEL-CMOR#1 M-2 COMPOSITEW NDOWS f ( "^ �- -' -� el......ens6n graham arthlleats SA 2 DECORATIVE MECHANICAL GRILLE �- -10A- ALUMINUM PLLMNUMPNO GLASS ALUMINUM I L50 LO 560 was M1ln#IPn avanu south 11A2 WTALRREDAWMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM KEY PLAN p- ne o P2 Na 3 asala`55 e15 ' 12M2 METALiWLINO SYSIEM �� i i t P 6 f 3 3 3 9 5 5 6 6 {: 1w2a. 1 ;9 .5.112 c o m Ike l"°j �~ 13„-3 �-.t Y I _ 11.....1 I ;gVEL1 w so ch i III i mor PHASE T UTH SOELEVATION I J Y F •• A-.,A )1 cif y_G• r�er•�en u...o,.nae,.v a....wr..,nM. Cbalit ae' 69% CIw pM W:N "ne ag 314L I 4n" sHw.Iu....... tllba gAEatara:Ccvkab� P� i 3 Eyr`t! h I'1 H I RESIDENTIAL �._. - — - T,..a.....w..... 4 �2 : - - - -3,:.._'::.---f•^a: _,- -_._. - --Toa'-'o' - -- - - - "-- - - - - - - - _ _ SII z PH2-SOUTH ELEVATION - O6. �\ ! PHASE 2-WEST ELEVAl10N ((��` .i3KF A3DA 2S]t3'"a.- E as I Me o aiF vra(e ,� G CWa6 Wt6RM Fcaarap 17?4 O 00 II [laa q Idgarif C6YrraEr 07L A B C D F G H J K L a FINAL PUD February 2, 201 S e- }+,-�� tF�1 ]Lw 0t'..w.'� i I I I,�)1 . �T,i y ORID INAL ISSUE: ne,ns I: :. `: }, 1, i I r r 3 1 I LL-TTii..��.T4JJ--1133 LLFYJJ1i1 LEVELb ' } }p1 • # 1 i I; i ��1♦ _ -161'-4 REVISIONS f ^I t �. I ',1 No. Oes cllP Ilan Date • 1f Ili .-,J..- ILJ LJ 1 �� 1 _ _LEVEL�S�� 50 k V KEY PLAN , _.I ri I i,... r-L. r ^- 4-aa+e, II{,,1{�jy{+I.r�{'}_ 3 i F"�. ,3-�• ~t It�l } i =M �J '11AMgYwl�d f I Y } v j E, fr i I I, �i F t� {L11 I ITT LevEL 5 - t. f 1 F`"• �RIMt#gR�" '�-- ''IIF' 1tIENMYM1"` ""'lIlMlr... .I _ ... L.._. r I. { LEVEE 214521 A -� - b. c r.a c,H.NNa 1 � ESG- ESG I HA Ik 11e 7 r I I jJ ----- II - - _ _ t _ - - 1 1 I Central Park West Phase ID12 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS EST-WELEVATION-WELEVATION _ P H 2 A3 .1 Central Park West Phase 1&2 DLC Res lde ntlal DLt 2A- _._ Kimley>>Horn Ry_OF_n EXTERIOR MATERIAL KEYNOTES-PHASE II #t}�� p ITi BRICK COL _ .t 20.2 STONE COL-11 STS'_ "•-'-+ �• i-�..S�L I .- - -E 25-2 STONEORCASTSTONEBASE --� - - J �' _ SA-2 PREFMSHED METAL PANEL COLOR#1 e je �T_, _ j• i SB-2 PREFINSHED METAL PANEL COLOR J2 SC-2 PREF N9HED METAL CORN CE COLOR J2 i r _ y�-_ L. /1 1 i�-.=. _1�,_1�. 50.2 PREF NSHEDMETALCANOPY COLORS l> r 1�1"�1 SE-2 PREF NSHEO METAL SPANOHEI/fRAN5ON PANEL-COLORJt J- - -�--�_- e r —_ elness srrenson prahlamla rr sneJss •A-2 COMPOSITEW METAL NDO�S _ '�- -' rl _LEV�EL'. � IA2 DEk!—ITE MEDIUNICAL GRILLE - _ - <.-, - SO' O \/ mp nn<Apollspmin esotaJ SS/PICS ,OM2 ALUMNUMANDGLASSBALCONY - It , t 110.2 PgEFIN15HE0 ALUMINL0.15TOREFRONT SYSTEM I I.1 1 2 S a p S S O Z 120.-2 METALRAILING � i Li t ¢L✓�11 l f ww w,ie.3 3 9 5 3 "..-...-s1 y7 spa rchcom 3_ _ LEVEL s KEY PLAN . w .....,.,..�.....r,..<,.,,,,n PHASEz-NORTH EtEvanap --_ _—__—_— , L —_ '�_t- W 11 s. _ •� —�Ilws` _ .........Mmn<.... 3b'-. C4uct—a t ..�. 1 i j . I s —1 —— 1 S1X -��— — ;EVEL3 I LEVEL.-P t (� I �d `O� O J z PH2-NORTH ELEVATION ' 0.9 &ST-1'-0' GO L - TK J 1 H A. qr I I I I I I I I I I I I FINAL PUD RO —————— I 1 I I I II { } "�'� February 2, 2015 ('-j"--r I -- -- � i-� -r-----------t--------rEv ---- —r-----r— --r— ^r-t—r'- -;�T-^---�'—' I --r-- -b, ' I1 ORIGINAL ISSUE: n _;EVEL3 REVISIONS j KEY PLANEVEL4 I � _� r � .'. 'A.�.....�...�-�-�-, _ _ -� _mss _ s.�Ires'.�t' --•. I --}--_____•LEVEL,II ESG_ ESG I I I I I I I I I I I I .n nw A - I I I I I I I I I I I PHASE 2,EAST UWATION fOrA:COMpOL•E v1kFALE rs.. Central Park West Phase 162 [i#iM#rar MlCvunAn F 5. Csep■Mav,im Cm'erNtF i2 uwrelpra.�l-�,a.px v,, 1 PH2-EAST ELEVATION EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 2 A3 b32-1'-0' PH2 A3 .2 O O © O © © O ► esc ..................................... ........eaYea.ea.eaeaaeeeee•►eeeeeeea/• Mi�Ti I .....................................� �e<ee<e<e<a<♦<e<e<e<e<e<♦<e<e<e.4<4•♦<e<e<a<e<-<e<e<e<♦•e,4<ee<ee<e<♦•� ___.- .. __ }.. -...�e♦<e<♦•a<<<e<e<e<1,Y<e<♦eee<e<e,♦<ee<e<eee<eeeeee•Jee<ee<e<e<ee<e<4� ..................................... L� _ __ 11 ._ EL !L L i:: .._LL I--- ---- -o. 000�.�.�.00�.�.�.ro�.�.�.o�.os�� , :•.o•.o•.oo•.•oo❖.•e•.•.o•.-e•.-.00•.o•.-.o-.-o.°.ee-.o•.• ,. ,pp..............,�,.....,...pp,.,.,.,.<.p<.,.<.,1<.<.,.<.<.,.<.<.,., i�♦�.�♦�e�o•O�♦�♦<O�e�e�e�♦<O�e<O�e�♦,O�♦�♦�e,O�Oe<O�e�e�e�e�♦�e�e4�♦�♦� i .:;. Vii' 2�`. _� <i•:':-:°:':°:❖:•:':•:9❖:•:':-:':°:•:':-:':•:':-:�i°:':':°:°:-:❖:•i! •eae.aa.eee♦ e. ee e. • e♦ ♦ee.e ♦� 'e-e-eee°e•'eeeeeeeo°4•e'eee•♦•♦•1°e-♦°•'eaeae°1•ee-a°eae•♦� � RI I R{ � RI ■,� � � -'�' � I' "��:❖:❖:-:•:-:•:':^:•:°:❖:❖:❖:❖:❖:❖:❖:A:❖:•:':':•:':•:-/ eeaeee♦ aeae.aaa.♦ a♦♦1eae♦eaaaaeaea♦ ♦♦e♦ae♦eeaoeaee.ae.eeee•eeeUeeeeae♦♦/ •aeae.�.•Q .•..•,.�.•°•Q.•.,1.•..•�•.•,..•..°,•� i � f Ela3l 1� . .�i 1®Ef E � L�� -e•••---'••Ae--"•-•••-•A-'•---aaaa---'r•A•-••.••4-•� ��e•�a°��e-�4•�e`4�•4°��4`e•4J4`e`e`•♦`4.4`<`4Ve`o•��4`e•♦•♦ ` �::e•�OO♦O`ee-��V 4••��eO'O��e•Oe°♦♦e`OJ•ee•♦•O♦'♦•O�4 \ -e'e'eee°eee°ee°eeee°e'e°eeeee-e•�4•♦•eeee•4•♦•eae°e-♦•♦� - ; g_� ..�ee•4.4'♦•e-4'e•♦•e^e°e�•e°4'4•♦•4•e•♦'4•ee•4-e•♦•eAeee'e•♦'4•ee-ea/ �4-a°4-4•e-e'a'4'e'e•1-e'4'ee'e'e'ee'e'e•<-e-eae-♦•eee'eAe-4-4•e•♦•♦•� ! �� - � . y� f��e,♦;e�e�e�e�e�e�e�e��;4�e�e�e�e�e�e�e�e�e�e�e�e�e�4�e�e�e�e�♦�e�♦�e�e�4�/ eeeeaeeeaeeeeeeeeeeaeeea♦eeeeeeeaeeae q► i ! 1♦eaea.eeeeeee.aeeeeeaeeaeeeeeeeaeeaa/ 0<'O,-<•<-J<00-0<-<O'<°O,•<°<-<•<-O<'<•<'O,•♦� ♦e e o e♦♦e o♦o♦e e♦♦♦♦♦04♦e o♦4 e r e o e e e e o o a• fEltlff �E]E'EEEIaeecce♦eaaeee.♦a♦eeeeeeeeeaeoaa.a.aap Neeee�eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee♦♦aeaeeeee♦ ■= . . _ �e,y♦e♦,o eeeee♦eeeee a,�e♦•►eeeeee Vie. e r�-i=�>i=�=�'i=�•i=�=i a<i-i'e=i a°i°e e=e-i�-iia°i=0i=�=�=�<i♦♦ • •i-i a°i<i-i A<�<i-eYiOi�i=e<�°�'i a°i e<�AA<ii=Se's<i•i e=- i ia..a.a..eeea..ae..aae.aee♦♦aeaee.eae. � raa.eeeaeeaaaaeeaeeeeeeeeeeeeeaeaaee./ ♦ee.eeeeeeaea.eeeeee..eee♦eeea.ee.ee♦ ♦aeaeeeeeaaeaee♦e♦aeeaeeeeaeeaa.e..e♦ ieeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeaeeeeeeeeeeeeaee♦♦. �reeeea.eeleeeeeeaeeaeaaeee.ea..eeeeeea ♦eeeeeeeaeeeaeaaeeaaaeeaeeaeeaeeeae♦e e♦a.eaeeeeoaaeeoaaee.aeeaa.ne.eeeeeea iaeaeaeeeaeaaaaeaa.aaeeaaaeaa.eeeae♦♦. � � ree.eeeeeeae.aeeeaeaeeaeeaeeaeeeeaeeal •♦♦ea.ae.ae.e.ea.eeeaae.aeaaeeaea.aaa♦ ��:• •, �Oe;<�<�e;,�0<�<�O<-,°O,°♦OOOp-<-<�e',°ems<•e°Oe°e•<-<-e�,�000� 1r n ® � � � �e,O�e�e�e�e,O�e�o��De�e�e�0e�e�e�e�e�e�e�e�♦�♦�i,�e�e,0<04�♦�e�e�e�i ,•:•♦•e•<•,•e•:•eae,•:•:•:•:•:,•:,•:• :•eq•:,•:,•:•:•e• .. .� E!€if !• f IEEtt . i•;:°;•;•:•::•;•;•;•:•;•;•;•:s:•;:•:•:•:•:•:• ::•;•:•A;•;:•:•, ��,�,�,�,�,�,�,�,�,�,�,�,�,�,�,�,�,�,�,e,�,�,�,�,4,�,�,�,�,�,�,�,�,�,�,�,� • � .�_•^�<�<�e�<�<�<�<�<�<�<�<�<�<�<�<�e�<�<se�e�e�e�e�♦�e�e�e�♦�♦�♦�e�,�♦�e�,�e�! . •♦eeeeeeeeeeea •eeeeeeeee-eeeeeeeeeee♦. _� '' reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee♦e♦♦♦eeeeeeeeeea i°ii°ii°i'iii°iiii•°�i►iii'iiiaeae°i••iiii0°ilii°i•Oi•1 � � e-aaaa•••°^••••••••••••♦•• ►••••••eea• ee.ee.e.e.aeed eeeeeee.eaTiaaeeeeee.aa♦ � •:' le eeeaeaaeeee.aeeeeaeeee♦e•e eeeeeeeee. a e e e e e e e e e e e e e a e e e.e e e e e e a e e e e e e e e♦♦. .: _ - , z-: +._ ic; <'<°e-<-<°<•e°<°<O��°<°e-Oe'O,O'O<'00<O°<':•i4•Oi•Oii•Oieai ♦eaeeaeeeeaeaaaaaeaeaeeeaeeeeeeeeee♦♦ ♦e.eeee.eeeeaaeeeeaaeeaaee♦eeeeeeeee♦ eaeae.aeaeeaeaaaa.aeeaae.eeaaeaaaea♦♦. F..-�..- .`Un- limp' �! '�"! .,,- Ieeeeaeaaayae.aaaaee.eeae♦a;eeeeeeeee. ♦.ae.ee.a..e.aeaa.e..ea.aeee..aeaeee♦ ie�. Ie/.. ♦eae.eeeee/aaee.ae.aeeee♦e ►eaaeaaae4 !e!QOeAO!epi'i!e0•Q.!e-i-e!e!e!e-ii�i!QOe!Oi!o!Oi!Oe!o�e!Oei RiR i� 1 �i�ir® i ~t�<''alOi�ili . �4tii� i°� � _i _ �' �•i!ei!ofOi?e-i!QA1i0-i!eA!ei'♦!e?Qe°i!e°i!e!.a0/A•O.°.!i!Oi'e�i!.! .............. .ea__ • .eG...._..... .e_e._:.a_..c♦...ea._.e.c..♦<e._.Ge... � 4aa.eaee.aaeeaea..eeea.e.e.eeeaaeaeee♦e♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ t:t:��a'Bew:��o`�POOa'�w:��0a;w:Jeeooe/ eeeee♦ee►e♦♦♦♦44♦��a`��i��Jt•��♦��e�a'�e4'��Pov:��♦eeeeeeeoeooeeeeeeeeeeeee ♦ Jeeoeeeeoe taee.eeeeeea..eaee.e..eee...eeaa.ee♦♦11a1♦♦1♦♦1e1♦a♦♦♦a1e11♦ �a♦•eel♦♦♦a♦1♦♦e♦, 1♦ea.ee♦ baa.aeee••♦e♦♦•♦♦eaee♦1•►♦4e♦♦♦aaee ♦eee♦♦♦eaea♦♦aaaeeae.eeeeeeeaeaeeeeeee•.♦9♦e.aeaeal/ ♦♦aeeeeeeeeee.eeeeeeeeeeeeeea.eeeeee♦e♦♦e♦lelll♦1♦la♦lall♦♦,. ♦♦.. X1111♦1♦♦♦♦;..♦eeeeee/ eeee♦e♦e►eee♦e♦♦eleele .aaaa♦/ecceeeeeee♦►eeee♦eeeeeeeeeeeoeee♦ ♦eeeeeeee♦♦eeeeeeeee/ �aeeeeeeeeeee.eeeeeeeaeeeeeeeeeaeeaeae♦aeeleeall111111e11ala�eea*�1♦11♦♦♦1♦e1.�'►leeaeee �eeeea♦e•aaeeee♦eeaeeea .♦.♦eeeeeeeeeeeee♦eee♦e♦♦eeeeeeeeeeeeeeee-i eeeeeeee♦♦eeeeeeeeeea ♦eeeeeeeee eAeeeeeeeeeeee a°e eeeeeeeeeeeeeee♦eeee♦eeeee♦♦eeeeee�leee_eeee♦♦♦♦eee4 ieeeelee/ eeeeeeeeaeeeeeeeeeeeee�i1♦♦♦eee♦•eeeeee♦eeeee♦eeeeeeeeeeeeY♦ eeeeeeeeeee♦♦♦•eeeeeeee4 �eeaeeaaeaa ♦eeeeeeeeeee♦ ♦eeeeeee♦tee♦♦♦♦♦♦♦•eeeeee♦♦e♦a♦♦eelleeeeea♦e♦♦♦lelalaallalae �eaeeaaee♦♦elalaaea.aaeveeeeleeeeeeaeeeeee♦1e♦•eeeeeeeeeeeee ►eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee! ee..e.ae.eeaea.e..e.♦ .e.e.a.e..eoeeaeeaeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeaaeeaa♦♦aaeela♦♦11♦laeaaaaal♦/ aeaoaae.eleelelaea.eeeeeeeeeee♦a♦aeaeaeaeneaaaaaaae.eae♦e.Aeeeeeeaee.eeeeeanaeee.aa.a e dee♦.♦•eeeeeeeeeeeee.eeeeeee.eeeee.eeeeeeeee♦♦eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee♦♦♦1♦♦eeeeeeeeeee♦ eeeeeeecce♦eeelee.eeeeee4aeeleaaaeaa.a.aeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeaeaeeeeaaeaeeealaae.aeeeeea ♦eeeeeeeee♦<e•eeeeee eke<e e<eee° eeeeeeeeee<e•eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee♦ ♦eeeeee♦ eee/ ♦eeeeee•eeeeeeeeeeeeeeaee�eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee �1.eeeeaeaa ♦.♦eeeee ♦ ♦ oa..eeaa♦ ♦aaaee♦ee.aa.aleaeeeeeeeeeeeeae.ee eeeeaae••aeae �eeeeaae•aaeeaeaaeaeaa♦ ♦a ae.a..eeeeeeeee�eee♦♦te.e♦eeaeaeaaeeee.ee.eaeeeeeeeeeaeeeea/ ee.e♦.♦eaaea.e♦♦.eaeeaae.♦.e.a.♦a.alaa.aeaeea♦laeaeee•♦♦aeeeeeeeeaaeeae♦-♦iiaeaaaaaaaea/ eaeeaaee►aaeaeeaaaaeaead e�aeeeeeeaeeeaeee/eeeeeeeeeeaaaaee^eeeeeeeeeeaeeeeeneeaeaaae. �eee.e.e.aee♦eeeeeeeeaeaeeeee♦♦♦•aaeeo♦♦•eaeeeeeeeeeaeeeaaeeaeeaeelaaaa/ ♦aaeelaeea..a �e♦ae.ae•.eeeee♦e♦aeoeeaeaee♦♦eae♦aaaeeeaa;aeeaeeaeaaa.♦eeeeeeeeeeeaaeaaeeaeaaeeaeea♦ei eeeee.•♦♦eeee.eeeeeeeeeeeeeaeeeea♦♦e.eeeeeeeeeeeeeaeaeaaaaeeaaa♦aaoaeae♦-ilaeee/eeee♦♦/ eeaeeeew►eeeee♦eee♦eeeeee�eeeaeaeaaaeaaaa/eeaaeeeeaeeeeeeeoeeeeeeeeaeeaeea.oaeeae.e♦/ ..e.e..........eeeeeeeeeee.eeeeealeeeeeeeeeeee ecce.♦ae♦eeeaaaeaa..e..ealaea♦eeee...e .♦.e.e.e..eee.ee...eeeeee/e ♦eaaea ♦eeaea♦;a.aaeeaeaeee♦eeeeeeeeeeeeae.aeeaaa;.ae..eee.! ♦eaeeeeeleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeaeeala♦♦eeeeaeeeeee 0i eeaeaee.aee.aaeeaeeee.ealaeeeee eeeee/ eleeeeee.eeeeeeeaeeeeeeeee0 eleaeliaaaaaareeaaeae.ele♦seaeYeeaaeaa.ae.aee.e/eaeeeee♦a e♦.eeeeeeaeeeeeaeeeeeeaeeaeaaeeee♦/♦♦aeeaeeaaeaeeeaeaeaeaae.aaee.e..eaeeaee.ee.Oieaeee �eeeeaeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeaee♦Oiaa.aaaaaea.aeeeeaaea♦.♦♦••eaaeaeaaae.a.♦e.ea.eeeeeeeeeaaa e.1.1♦-11.1.1.1♦1_e.1-------------- eee.1.lw1.♦1.eeae�ee_♦eeeeeee.ee_eee eea ee ee_ae e1_e.e_ae a-e-a-e ee e_ee a-1 e-a-e-ee ee.e.ee e.e./ . .e.eeea-ee a-e eee ae e.e.ee ee.a.eeeee.ae a-a e_e-41.a eeaa 4e-A.e-wee-e-e.ee-ew.e.ea.eea.A_a1e-ae_eee-e-4.4 a-ee-ee A.e•eea ee_e.A. \ .ea_..e.e..a.e...Ge...ea...e.G..a.♦...Ge...♦a...♦.c..a.e._.ce.._ea...e.c._a.e...Ga_...e.. . .eaG..e.e..:Ge...ee...♦aG..e.o_.�.e_._ee._.ea.._e.e..a.a...ce...ea...a_a._a.e...Ga... � a'�eee.eeeeeeeeeeeeeeee.e♦eeee.eea.ee♦e♦e♦e.ea.ee.eeeaeeeeeeeaaeeeeaeeeeeeeeaea.eeeeaeaeae♦/ reeeeeeeeeee♦eeeeeeee♦e.eeeeeeeeaeeeeeeeeeeaeeaeeeea.ecce♦eeaeeeeea.aeea.eaaeaeeaeeeee ♦aeaeeeee♦eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee♦eeeeeeeeeeeeeeaeaeeaaeeaeea.♦eaaeaaea.aeeea..e.e.eee______ ._eeeaeeae.ee♦eeeeeeeaeaeeeeeeeeeaaeaeaeeeaeaeeeaeae.eeeee♦leeaeee♦♦.ea.eeaeleeaeeeeeae•.--- eaelaeeaeeeaeeaeaeaeeeeaeeaaaaeeae♦alaaeeeaeeeeeeaae.eeaeaoe.aeeeaeeeae.ee.eeeeeeeeeeeeeeaee.ele ��ce�aeeaaeeeaw►eaeaeeeaeaaeaaee�a.aa.aa.a.aaae♦nee.ee.e.eeeeaelloaaaa♦♦e.eeeeeeeeneeeaeaae4aae♦ ♦eee.♦eaee.aaaa.a.aa.aaae♦e..ae♦1al♦eaeae.eeaeee.♦eaee.eaea♦.eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeaeeeeeaeeeeaeaeeaee♦ aaaaealeoaa♦eeaa•e♦aaae♦oaeaeael♦/ae..e..e.eeeaee•eeeeeeae.•♦•♦lllaeea.aeeeeeeeeeeeeeaaaaeaa..eeea •eeeeee.e♦.ee.e♦.e♦ae..aeeee♦.e.a11e♦eaea..e♦e♦ee♦e♦eeeee♦•.eeeee♦eeeeeeeeaaeeeaeeeeaaeaa.aaaae♦ ►♦•aaae♦e.ae♦..♦a.♦♦♦♦•aaee♦excel♦dee.eeeeeeeaeeeaneee.aeeleaa.l♦1♦ueeeeeeeeeaeeeaeanoae.eo.e4eee♦ w�w�wtw�wtw0000•w'.00'.000•Jw•00e'0000A00-04A!w�.!w!wtw!..'w•0040-e•DOwtOQw�04A°Ow•Ow'O°O•wlwAtw•wAA�.�w�w�w�e�e.00A•..tw01 ae��a a e e aee.•.�a ...M..e......'.•.�.•...'........•..•.....'.e..�a e��e e��e e e a��a e e a e e ee♦♦e e e e a e a e e a e e e a e a e e a e e e e e e e e e e a - w. . .e.wwu. - - e. e,. ew w. w.e♦.wwwwwwwAww..-.................e.e.e,..............s.e. • e� 0�♦��♦��i�e.��i�i�e��i,� w 4 1•i•Pii'iii O�':`i`:`:`i`:•�`�`:`�•i'i�•�`�`i`�•i`i`i`i`:`:`i'i`i'i`i Owli - i::iia:❖:':❖:°:-:•:°:•:':-:°:❖:°i1i:❖:❖i:•O:-:i-:•:°:':':-i •eeaeaaa.a..aeeaaeaeaaeaoeaeeaeaeaaa� r■ ■■ a♦ Iaeaea.a..aa•.aea►eeeeaeeeeaaeeaao .❖.❖.❖.❖.❖.❖ .•.-.❖.❖.❖.•.�1❖.❖.❖.❖.❖.•.� -' ..:: �-. ■i ■■ , ! , ..❖ 1❖.❖.❖.•.•.❖.-.❖.•.❖.•►•.•.•.•.•.•.❖.•.-.•.•.•.•.•.•,• �,ee<eeee<e°e<e<leeeeaeee•.a.�e<eae<e<eeee-eae<e,.eae<eeeaeee°e<ee<eea� �1e ee ee eee a•eea a ea e a as e e ee eee e e ee a ee ae. R1t Rr Rr■ Rr• rr■ s■ rRa• Rr Ra eeeYaeaeeeaeaae.e.aaaeeeeeeeeeaeaeea4 !G-i•G•G•:°eea❖:°:•i°G°G�°:°a:°i°:•_❖ci°.�.•.°ia°G•G:°O:•s•:L-��_ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ ..�.-�.�.. _ -�,._ ►aeae>�.eoe a.♦eee e o aw.ew a www•a ee�.e e.♦��o eo we. . %:�:�:;:�:�:;:�:�:�:�:�:�:�i�:�i:�:�i:O�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:;:�:�:�:� I ■i E� ■■ %:�ii�:%:�i:%:;:;:�:;:;iso:%:�:�:�:�:�:�:O�:�O:�:��:�:�:�:%i ��a°a'aeae'eee-eae°a/�•a-a°eaeae-•'eaeae U'eee-a-ae'ae'e'ee� � ' ■ ■ ■■ ■ `{ ■{ �..� i � ii.►e'je'U-ej'eje-e'ee-eejjejee�►•aejjjje'eje'e•,•j'a'j•<• ♦♦aaa..aeee.eae♦aeeaeeaeeeeeaaeaeeae♦ � � �■` `■� �■a �■� ,� � ■ �Ieaeaeaeeaaeaeaaaeeeeeaeeeaeeeaeaeeaal ♦.aaaeea♦eeaea.aeaaleaeaAaalaaa.eae.� 'Q ♦a♦A♦♦♦eaae.a..eeeealeaaelee..eaeea.. ,'i e..•i'w...•i.•e.•i w.ej...eo•,...e e,..of�o-�oe�E� � EEEEfiE♦ r• r r R r R AA R i..�!� EEEE�� ►,•i•,�. 4i•0i❖.e•':O.<♦:•0i❖.i0.Dii:°i.ai❖••0iO•°O❖ei°O<i°-ii<O•Oi•i<i•/ii►-•'°Oiaeii°•:Oai'ii--Oaais<aD•:0-<O:0d•aa•Oa,i�weri❖ei°a<i:�eei':�°a<i••:❖e<ii•Oe,i:°a<ii`:i•eei:i°.i:i❖e<i`ei,ii•� ' � ■.� ■ ■ ,■ i►.►:v:.e❖:•e:%ee�iexe❖:e:e•0,:e•.°:�1❖:.4'e•M-• r` i: :❖a:0❖❖:: 11:. ° 0•'♦ ......l :e:e.-:ii�.:e:0:a•.e e�a❖:e:eQ::e�.❖:e�.:ei:e�;:ae0a,••❖:.je:e�ii.:e.i�.❖:.�:Qee�::•.❖.�,e:e�:��•:e.:�:e•.-,:�•a-:e,:�•:e•e:�i':ee:�,❖:a�.�:e�.i�i e.::�we❖:ea�se:ee,:�:e�eO�-�e:emoi�i.•. AP . ■ t s M wr• �rm MIN �R ►eea••°•e'eee•°•-•eaeeaes•Oe-♦•e'e-e-a•0e•Oe-OD.°.•♦•e°♦-e0e. , ._. s<e��e. •-eea�.<.<��<., .eee�� <a<.��e<a<e�..<e<.<�.e<eD<..eea<aa.�.a<° ii:ie::e::i::i�:e:i e♦::�:iiei'+►y:i:•:e:-:e:e:-::-:e:e:: II I �I � i�e��:�:�:�e��:�:�i,04�e�:�i�e�:�♦�i,'�:�e�e�♦�:�:O�e�e�:�i�:�e�e�:�:V • raeeeaeeeeeaeeee ♦♦eee eeoe.eeeeaeeee' ►♦ eaeae eaeea.aaeeeee.eeeeeee..a.a.aa re♦e.♦.♦aaaae.aa0aaeaeee°i..eaeaae.eoa e. •■■1 a =::� a♦a.♦.aaaeaeae..eeeeaeeeeeea.e.e.ee.♦ •OO.•.•.•.•.•.O-.O•.0•.•.•O.•.O.O.'.•.•OA•0.•.•.•.0•.•OO.•.• . . .........A s LLM ,r rwwr rrws rsrcr rrra■ __ � �wn� ...oaaeeeee.eeeeaeew►aee.ae.eaeeeeaeo :•is0°:•:':-:O°:-:':-:-:°:❖:•:':❖:❖:•:�i•:°:•:-:°:-:-:•:i':°:� i❖:�i❖:•:-:O❖:-:9-:♦♦•:-:❖:•:'i':•:-:•:':❖:•:O-:°:':❖:❖:� i0❖i:-:❖:-:-0:❖:•:-i!:-:❖:'a-:❖:°:•:L❖:❖:❖:-:❖:•:-i F I +• i•:°:•i❖:•:-:':❖:-:❖:0�:•i:•:-:4❖:❖:-:-i:•:-:❖:❖:•i:•:!i ♦eaeeaeeaeeeae.eeeJ►iaeee eeeaeeaeale µ'•n. j ` �■� �� ■� � ...,.r....r» .�♦e♦Ieeeeeeeaeeeeeeae►a.e.eeeeeeaeeae/ �iiiiii°ii'ii0°eaeae♦'•i°ii°i-ii0-ii-1'Oii'iiiiiii°i� s. .. ►ii-i•1•ii-i-iii°iii°i-iiiiii'►'i-e0•iiii'i°i°iiiiiii! .°..°.....ee.♦.law►......•...♦...e....e♦i�(i �ir___�_ rr rrr r Rr r.r .r rR r ,e. ria ►ae.e..♦eeeeeeaeeeee•aaa..ee..le.eeeea 1.1 eee we eeeee ee. w1w1A_1♦-1 w.U.w a-1•...wee eew, ra-1, rR-.- eee�.e♦e we.e_e a eew.ee eeee wa w.►.e aw..w_e-e.e.eae a a-ew \ ♦.G__avev__Gav_vea_v_e_G__ave_vvGevvvvvv_ve_v_vv .e._vvvvvv _•iG__vv_v_<Ge___4e___1a_vva_4__a_e__.iev_veay.. reeeeeeeeeeeaee�e♦eee.eeeAee.eeeeeeaaeaaa�aeeeeee9a',��a'��♦��a1��1��V:��/•�e��e��.�V:♦aaee..aee��V;��e.eeeeaaeeaeeAeeeeeeeeeeaeaeeaea.ee..eeeeaaeaee ♦eaeeaeeeaaaeaaeeaeeeeeaeeeeeeea.eaeaeae•eaeeea♦♦♦,dee♦e♦Ua♦eaee♦a♦♦a♦♦a..♦et♦♦♦eaee.aaaaaee.al.a.♦eaee..aJaa♦eae.eaa.eaaeae♦e.e♦•eaea♦eeeeeaeeeaeeaeaaeaeaeeeeeeeeeea.aeeaaa r.ea.leaea.aealeaaaaeeaae.aaaaea.eaeeae♦eaeaae.♦a♦, .e♦eee♦ea♦♦eeeeeeeeeee.aeeeaeaaeeee.a.ee..e♦ ♦eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee♦♦♦♦e♦♦eeealeaeeaeaaaeeaeeeaeaae♦♦eeeeeeeeeaeeeeaeae.a. eeee.♦♦e.eeee♦e1ea.♦♦♦eaa;aa.ae.e.eeeeeeeaeeee..e♦1'.¢►eeaeeA♦♦♦aaaeaeeaeeeeeeeeeeeeee♦♦.eeeeeeee.ly'eeeeeaeeeeAeeeeeaeeeaeee♦♦eeeaa.ea.e.♦♦..eeeaeaaeaaee.eeeee�eaaeeeee.eeeeeeea recce♦♦aeeeeeee�eea.♦♦eear.e.aeeeeaeeaaee�eeeeee♦e..ae♦aeae♦eae♦a.eeeeeeeaJeeoeeeeeeeeeaeea♦eee..♦ea..aee.a;aaaeeaeee.aeaae..e.eeeeeee.ee.eeoeeeeeaeeeeeeeae.►1.aelea.eeeeeeoo ♦eeeeeeeeeeaaeaeeeeeeeeee.aaaeeaea.ea.eea♦eeeeaaaaeaaalaaYalaae.ee.a♦eaeeeee.•eaeae.m R. .�e.a..ee...eeee♦/ace•.eee.eeeeea4eeeeeeaeeeeaeeeeeeeeee♦eeeee..e..eelee.eeeeeaeaaea r♦aaeeaaaa.♦aea!eeeaeaaeaoaa♦ae.e♦.♦a♦aaaa♦•eeaaaaee.e.eee�eeeeeeee.ee.eee►eeeee.oa.e..ee./e.ee..e.eeeeeee.eeeeeaee.eaee.ee►eeeeeaeeeeaaaeeoeaeeeaeaae.eaeeeoeeeeeeaee.ea.ee4 Vie..eeeeae.aeaaaeeaaeae.�aaaaa..eeeee.aeleee.eaeaeeeaeeee/eeeeeaeeeeeee♦eeeeeee0eeee.♦eeee�eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeAeeeeee♦eeeeeeee.♦eaeaaeaa♦.eeae�eea.eaeeaeaeaeeeeale ea1..e.eeeeea ♦eeeeeeee♦e♦ee.♦♦♦ae♦♦o.raaeaeeeeeaae•eeeeeeeeeeeeeaeeeeeeaeaeaaeaeaeeaaa►♦eaeeaeeeeeeee♦/eaeaeeeee.aoa.ee♦eae.♦eeeeaeeaeee..e.eeeeaeeeea.re.♦e.aaoeeeeeeeaollle1.e.eeeeeeeo ♦eeeeeaeeeeeea4eesee.ee.eeeeeeeaeaeeeeae4eaeeaeaaeeaaeaaalaeea♦♦eee♦aaaa•oaeeaeaeee♦eeeeeaeaeaeaeea♦♦a.ae.aeaaa.o.a♦ ee.a.ea.leeeeeeeeaee♦eaeeeeeee.eeeeeaeaa♦e♦aeeeeeeeaeeaa aeaeeaaaaaeeae�aaeeeeeeewaeea♦♦eeaaeaa♦e�aaeaeeaeeaae.aaaeeeae.•eae.a♦e1.♦e♦aa♦♦eae♦.♦aeaeeae♦e♦e.e.eeaeee♦ee.•eaeeaceaeo�eeeeeeeeaeaeeeeeaaeeeeeeaeaeeae.e♦eaaeeeeaeeeea.a ♦..♦1♦eeeeaa.♦aoaaaeaeeaeeae.e♦a..ae.eeeaaeeeeaeae..•eea.oea.eeeeeeeaeaeleae♦ee.♦♦e♦..a.eaea.eeeeeeeeeeeee►eeee.eeeeeeeeeeaeaaae•aaaa/aea..♦♦aeeeaeaeeae♦ee•♦eeaaaaeeeeee.ee• eeeeeeee♦♦♦e.e♦♦eee.la.♦V.aeeaee♦l♦♦e♦ee♦eee..eeee.eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeaeaeeeeeeeeeeeee.•eeeeeeeeaeeeaaeaaaeaeeeaaeeeeeeeaeeeeeaeaaee♦ ae11♦♦♦Yee♦eaee.eeeeaeaeee♦1♦♦eaeee.e.ee4 ♦eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee.ee.a;.eeaeeaeeeeeeeeeaaeeeeeeeeeae.aawaaaaeaeaeaa.aeeaaeeaeeaeaeeeeeea�aeaaelaa♦.alaaa/aaaaeaaaeeaa..e.e.♦ae♦a/•eaeeeee•eeeeeeeeeeeeeeaeaaeeeeeeeeeeeeeae. reeae.laleeaeee�aaeaeeae.Ieeeaeeaeeeaaaae�laeaeeaaeaaa♦.eelaeae.a.e.ae.ee e►aeaaeaeaaee.ae♦/aaeae•♦eeeeaaae�♦.ea.eae.eaaa.ee�eeeeeeeeaaelee♦•Ieeeeeeaeaeeeaeee►•eea♦eeeeeaeeea4 ♦e.e.eleaeeaaaa♦.aaaeeeea;eee.aeaeeaeaaaea♦♦a♦eeaa♦ea.eeeeUaeeee.eeeeeeee.•aeea.♦aaaa.♦♦♦♦♦�a♦e♦eee♦e♦eel♦♦r♦eee♦•e♦♦♦♦e♦Beale♦eeeeaeaaaeeeeaeeeee♦.eaea.eee�aeea♦♦laaaeae..e1 r♦_e www a-e w-ee-e w aA.w-w w♦-w_w_e e.1 e.re ew wA.w-e w e-e-w_a we-wwa l-e wA.w ea w-wA-e w e-e.we w eeee e.e we.e e.e w-w-w►e w_w-w..w e-1-w-w w..e-w_w/-e e.w-w.ew w.ww-e w e-ee.1•ww.w.e♦-1 w.ew w1 a-e.we♦�.e.ee ewe-w-w a-a we.♦♦-e U.e-w.a a e-e-e.e w♦-www e.e 1.►.e♦-w weA.1 a e_e-w-w w we.1•- . ♦_4v_ave__.ie_._♦a___e_G�vave___Ge___ee_avevi__J_e_vvGavv•.♦ev_vavG__e_ev_�Ge_v_ee___evG_vele__vvev_veevvvaav__eve__avevvvea vvvaav__evev_a_♦___.e___ea___a_G-vave___ee___eavv• . ■raea.aaaaeeeeae�aaee♦eaee/eeeeaeeaeeeeeaa.aaaae♦eaeeaa.aaae♦eaea♦.•e.ea.e♦►eeeaeaeaeaaeeee/.e..eaae.eee.aaee.e.e1♦♦aaeae♦♦e►ee.aeeeeeeleeeeUeeeeeeeee.aeae♦e►eaeeaeeeaeeae.aY -_eeaeeaeaaeeaaaa♦eleaeeeeaeeee.eaa♦eaaea.4aaa♦♦eaaaeeaeea.Vea.ae.eeeeee.ee.eaeaeaa♦♦eaeeae.♦eee♦e♦eee...eeeee.e♦♦e♦♦e♦eeeee4eeeee♦eeeaeeaeeeeaeeeeea♦♦.eea.e•eee♦♦♦ae.ee.aea.e.___._ 1-��ee.eeeeeeae♦..•eeeeea.eaaaaeaae.eeaee.eeeee.♦aaeeeeaee.eeeeeleeaeeeeeeeeeeeeaae.eeaeeaeeeeeeee.eeeeeeBeeeeaeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeaeeaaeaaeea.aaaeeaeaaaaee.ae.ee.eeaeeaaeeea.ea.eee.eeeaaaa aaeaeaaeeeeeeeeee♦♦aeeeeeeeee.eae♦♦eeeeee♦♦♦eeeeeeeeeee♦eeeeeaeaeAeeeaeaeaeeaeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeaeeeeeeeeaeeaeeeeealaAleeeeeeeae.♦eaaeaaa♦ae..e♦aeeaaee.eeee••eeeeaae.•e.eleeeeeeeeeeeeaae.aa♦ ►ate♦aa4aaeaeeaaeaeeeeeeeeaeeeeeeUeeeeeeae♦aeaaee.eaaeeee♦eea--------------------- - aaeaeeaee---- --------------♦-----------------------♦ee.a..ae♦♦1e.eee..ee.ee.eeeeeeeea♦eeeee.---►.------eaeeaeeaYaalel♦ w•eae..e•A e��•e��•eeeeeeew❖eae❖A�•.�•A•A..•e•A•w•eee�ee•.•eee.❖e•1•eee•.ew•e�•1•e�•.��•e�Via.��•e�•ee 1•1•A❖e�•e�e�•e•A�•e•11�e��•A�•ee'e�•e��•e��e e e • • ' a♦e a e��e e e e a e��e Ae a e a a e e a a e a e e e a e a a e e e - ♦ o.AA.A-1. ♦ w1.w.e.e www•AwwwwAwA Aew,eweaAeawwwaAewwAAe • CONSTRUCTION PLANS FOR CENTRAL PARK WESTE 'a ST LOUIS PARKIGOLDEN VALLEY, MINNESOTA PREPARED FOR: o - EDLC RESIDENTIAL i gV � R=qo INDEX OF SHEETS �WYS �si 1 CpRTLA Ulf`Zia EIR 6010 TITLE SHEET pN1AL RD rc 3`u C1R a CT]L IAL o l< 'Y�US GLE - REL AVE. 4Z.FLDRIDA CT.w LAUREL x AVE. \ VE STVCa LA ICREST3 3m`� 6020 SWPPP NOTES ti s ^wa�J & PRO-ECT LOCATION � €g€ 0h W DR. E°SLE ��4 ST. ' HILLu 6030 EXISTING CONDITIONS & REMOVALS PLAN <a G ' DEN S 4PI! 5; WAY ZAr BLVD `r Rju ` TR 6040 OVERALL SITE PLAN ''w A Gf� 6041 SITE PLAN (PHASE 1&2) - a >WI,<H 6042 SITE PLAN DETAILS ¢Nm o a J J W- 1619 S a Si. ` V. 161h ST. 6043 SITE PLAN DETAILS m } Cr, yNy ` m yy 6044 SITE PLAN DETAILS 1 4 IH th y 2S 'S M aT. GAMHLE pR. S c <a 56.S WILLOW LA. o Fi a a g c i[EDA^L 6050 OVERALL GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN to 6051 GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN (PHASE 1&2) AR S�c(PARK a 6052 GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN DETAILS j 1, 22nd ST. ¢ a 'a rc m LA. FCRfST Y9 S. "EEDARVDD� 6060 OVERALL UTILITY PLAN u,J 4 5<. 2H Yd ST. STEPHENSa DR k W. N. TWI d HA=swoon R T6061 UTILITY PLAN (PHASE 1&2) _ E 'ZA• 5` $ a W. 23 V2 4S. 50.G EWNRSLPOL. Yh W.zs<N 6062 UTILITY PLAN DETAILS V tH ST. 425 1S2 u ? W. 26t� ST, W. 26 6080 OVERALL LIGHTING PLAN J W. ` 27tH S'. > 2Z f1'ST. , 6081 LIGHTING PLAN (PHASE 1&2) �. - > i i < < a a W. 2 it T. r _CE AR LA KE 26tH ST. 26 H 3T. z£ g 5p 6082 LIGHTING DETAILS a V < % V OTTAWA PL 2r6t� y3T.`'8.W 6100 OVERALL LANDSCAPE PLAN tH sr. N W' :z9 eh sT. > a z 8 UTILITIES: CONTACTS: '; w o = W. 29 ti, sr. ze.f7EDA�, 6101 LANDSCAPE PLAN (PHASE 1&2) Century Link: Ave S. Developer/Owner. 6102 LANDSCAPE DETAILS 6244 a DEC LLC Richfield, MN 55423 5245RWayzataalBlvd. 6103 LANDSCAPE PRESERVATION PLAN } Phone: (651) 312.5421 St Louis Park, MN 55416 W Contact: Justin Johnson Phone: (612) 325.9767 6104 TREE INVENTORY J Center Point Energy. Contact: Rich Kauffman NOS" 6105 TREE INVENTORY �€ 700 Linden Ave W. UJJ 5 PO Box 1165 Civil Engineering Consultant: 6106 WOONERF PLAN 3: W Z g Minneapolis, MN 55401 Kimley—Horn (— Phone: (612) 321.5426 ` @ p Z 2550 University Avenue West, Suite 238N Contact: Andrew Balgobin 1�' J St. Paul, MN 55114 eI j Q W Phone: (651) 645.4197 .. d. O 0 Xcel Energy. Contact: Lucas C. Payne. PE {H (y J 1518 Chestnut Ave N.—First Floor F - A 2 0 2015 - � � Minneapolis, MN 55403 Municipality. ; L 1 W Phone: (612) 630.4127 City of Saint Louis Park ".;a H Q Contact: David Fitch 5005 Minnetonka Boulevard :.' Z U a W J Comcast Cable: St. Louis Park, MN 55416 ;a�:�— W (n 0 9705 Data Park Phone: (952) 924.2574 C) Minnetonka, MN 55343 (952) 924.2687 NOTE: O Contact: Sean Walther, Senior Planner J Phone: (651) 493.5303 SEEOFFSME PROVEMENTPIANSPOR Contacts: Duane Carison Scott Brink, City Engineer UTICA AVENUE FOR FOR EROSION CONTROL ALERT TO CONTRACTOR: PLANS 1. TH EPRESENCE OF GROUNDWATER SHO.LD BE ANTICIPATEDONTHIB PROTECT CONTAACTOR•SBID sCity of Golden Valley SHALL INCLUDE CONSIDERATION FOR THIS ISSUE.WHEN PERFORMINGGRADING OPERATIONS U) 5 Level 3 Communications: 7800 Golden Valley Road DURING PERIODS OF WET WEATHER,PROVIDE ADEQUATE DEWATERING,DRAINAGEANDGROUND DATE Minn Minnetonka, Rd. WATER MANAGEMENTTO CONTROL MOISTURE OF SOILS.REFERTOMASTERSRESPECIFICAMONS. Minnetonka, MN 55343 Golden Valley, MN 55427 ALL CONTRACTORS MUST CONTACT 03/20/2015 Phone: 952 351.2353 — Office Phone: (763) 893.8000 RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: DATE: GOPHER STATE CALL ONE 2' ALL GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED(EARTHWORI(FlNAL lffllfnES,AND FlNAL PROJECT NO. ( ) Contact: Jeff Oliver, City Engineer CITY ENGINEER, CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY GRADING)BY THE MILESTONE DATE IN PROJECTDOCUMENTS.OUTLOTAREATOBEKEPTFREEOF (612) 805.6827 — Mobile MN TOLL FREE 1-800-252-1166 JOB TRAILERS AND STORAGE AFT ER THE CONTRACT WLESTONEDATEFORTHEOUTLOT.GENERAL 160755001 Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE CLEAR ACCESS FOR OUTLOT CONTRACTOR TO THE SPECIFIC PARCELAT Contact: Bob Strong (bob.strongQlevel3.com) ALL TIMES AFTER MILESTONE DATE.PURCHASER OF OUTIOTTO PROVIDE PERMIT DOCUMENTSAND SHEET NUMBER E RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL- DATE: TIN CITY AREA 651-454-0002 SWPPP REQUIRED BY STATEiLOCAL REQUIREMENB FOR SPECIFIC OUTLOT. CITY ENGINEER, CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK 6010 �- - { - -- --- -.I I. — - G„i r� _..:,:,.�::, •:_:, �` �, �� `�„ � �-��_®�====se=.� I � � e=a��- UTICA AV w = w p p s s@ .s �=es a s� ,•, a t. ___ `y w ENU E p �----- V SEE UTICA AVENUE IMPfl—MENT v p p—� V �r—T�—� D • - PLANS FOR OFF ITE REM q15 p — - p 7Z7: '� y_ �.: -�+=_.�_ M -- 07 -___ --.-- 2 GAS GAS GAS GAS ,p ICY >> 10 EXISTING RkORANf /r: i�'I TO REMAIN Ct -- ----------\rrl 4 3 s —I I I(y� �, tw. I I I `• i DEMOLITION ON OUTLOTATO / \ ` �:j 'I 4\ SEE I EE PRESERVATKNJ L. OCCUR AT TIMEOFOFFICE 1 I PLAN FOR TREE REMOVALS - i DEVE Lo / I I ? f 1 --1 SEE OFFSITE PLANS FOR ;j N 0 r r ♦ \ I \. _ _\1 I� __ I;. SEWER RELOCATION / � i o cy {{/ 'f F% 'I 'T ' --✓ �-�^81 I::x ___�R)F Xw _ ET Xx 1 r—�� GAS GAS AS' �Hf3` ? 14'; 1 '� 9E X X—)E 3e�ecAx as x F6 k . O 'cid /� ;; �_ aanxRctantoavvrATelww oWe; IATPHAWALIYfi - t. .,,� 4.-� l ;�r 7-1 ° 11 i T ✓TJ//�I Y t I I \ \ r, 1 X E .. r— - ...-_ J / / 1 { e\ I I �"� 3 SEE MCES PIANS FOR �f , ! j 1 (1 ,\ , T'. i 1 TYP. REMOVALS/IMPROVEMENTT- — t1r 06 r - .., ''�'' � - � ""'"''''`-- ` ! \ � +� I I l � _- - •-�.z \';� - JG Q I l 1 • t i o cvv- r = LEGEND `"••� �__�`� t �� c - yr/ // // � , o (T ♦ r « , GENERAL NOTES (� W E - - PROPERTY LINE/ROW STgT • I i 1. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WRHTHECITYOFGOIDEN VALLEY E H ` -- /- / AND ST LOUIS PARK SPECIFICATIONS AND BUILDING PERMRREOUIREMENTS.WORK of CITY UMRUNE wY. --'�— �'--” /i�� / - NO --:'+ts �. •/ WITHIN WAV7ATA BOULEVARD WILL REQUIRE AMNDOT RONMILT PERMIT w Yfi 100 LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE � 2 CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE ALL UNDERGROUND PUBUG AND PRIVATE UDUDE3 LOCATED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION,EXISTING CURB ANDGUTTER ` -- EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER TO BE REMOVED REFERENCE TREE PRESERVATION PLAN FOR REMOVALS OF FXIS7ING TREES. ' TF�FF/F - .. �� -' / <. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING EXISTING BUILDING � _ � '"'_ � .,, UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES,SUCH AS EXISTINGGUTTER GRADES ATTHE J :._ L _»_ ._ "" -� �'� PROPOSED DRIVEWAYS,PRIOR TO THE STARTOF STIE WORK E%ISTING STORM SEWER � .:'-�_ `�--� S 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OFANVDISCREPANCIESOR W > J C EXISTING STORM CATCH BASIN MANHOLE VARIATIONS FROM THE PLANS. Z S ----� EXISTING SANRARVSEWER 6. ALL PAVEMENT,CURB 8 GUTTER TO BE REMOVEDSHALLBE SIWCUTATREMOVAI KEYNOTE LEGEND 1/ w }- LIMITS ORNEA0.ESTJOINT 0 • O EXISTING SANITARYMANHOLE J W 1O REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT 7. UTILRIES NOT MARKED MRREMOVAL SHALLBEPROTECTEDFROMDAMAGE DURING Q Q W EXISTING WATERMNN CONSTRUCTION.THIS WORK SHALL BE INGDENTALTO CONTWICT. OUT REMOVE CONCRETE PAVEMENT J �? (n y EXISTING FlREHYIXUNT 6. STREET SHALL BE SWEPT IN ACCORDANCE WRH CITY REQUIREMENTS. � W 04 EXISTING GATE VALVE O REMOVE CURB AND GUTTER 6. COORDINATE REMOVALS OF PRIVATE UTILITIESWRH UTILMCOMPANIES. i EXISTING GAS UNE O4 EXISTING SIGN TO BE REMOVED Z d J 6 10. PRIMTCO COMMENCING PROVIDE RKTRAFFICWITHIN CONTROL ROAN APPROVED BYTHE CITY Z EXISTING WATERMAIN TO BE REMOVED 8 PRIOR TO COMMENGNG ANY WORK WITHIN THE CRY ROW. C) -'---'�--' EXISTING CHAIN UNK FENCE 5 RELOCATED.REFERENCE UITTYPLAN. w E3 X EXISTINGCHAIN LINK FENCETOSEREMOVEp ALERT TO CONTRACTOR: 11. ALL TRUNK LINES OR SERVICE LINES TO BE REMOVED SHALL BE PLUGGED Ai MAIN. E O SAWCUT PAVEMENT O 1. THE PRESENCE OFGROUNDWATERORSHOULTHISDBE SUE.ANTICIPATEDON THISRMING PROJECT.CONTRACTOR'S BID 12. CONTRACTOR TO SEAL AND GROUT OPENINGS ABANI%NJEDAT EXISTING EXISTING LIGHT POLE Oj EXISTING LIGHT POLE TO BE REMOVED SHALL PERIODS CONSIDERATION FOR THISIBSUE.WHENPERFORMING GRADINGOPERATIONSAND GROUND DISCONNECTS `T �c DURING PERIODS OF WET WEATHER,PROVIDE ADEQUATE DEWATERING,DRAINAGE ANDGROUND S M EXISTING UGHT POLE TO BE REMOVED EXISTING HYDRANT TO BE REMOVED B WATERMANAGEMENTTO CONTROL MOISTURE OF SOILS.REFERTOMASTERSRESPECIRCATKNJS. 13, CONCRETE CRUSHING OF BUILDING MATERIALSISALLOWEDON.SITE.HOURSOF Q O RELOCATED.COORDINATE WITH OWNER. ALL CONTRACTORS MUST CONTACT OPE RATION SHALL BE LIMITED TOTIXAMTO]:DDPM.CONCRETETOBEREUSEDAS U) -� EXISTING SIGN 2. ALL GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED(EARTHWORK FINAL UDUTIES,AND FINAL AGGREGATE BASE SHALL CONFORM TO THE MNDOTSPEGFlGTION FOR WIiICI1 DATE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTTO BE REMOVED O EXISTING GAS MAIN TO BE REMOVED GOPHER STATE CALL ONE GRADING)BY THE MILESTONE DATE IN PROJECT DOCUMENTS.OUTLOTAREATO BE KEPT FREE OF MATERIAL WILL BE USED. O3/?O/2O1S Sk MN TOLL FREE 1-800-252-1166 Joe AND STORAGE AFTER THE CONTRACT MILESTONE DATE FOR THE OT.GENERAL i 0 CONCRETE PAVEMENT NBE REMOVED 10 EXISTING STOCK PILE TO BE REMOVED CON TRACTOR TO PROVIDE CLE AOR ACCESS FOR OUTLOT CONTNACTORTOTHESPECIMPARCELAT 14. DONS T RUCTION LIMITS TO BE THE PROPERTY UNE UNLESS NOTEDOTHERWISE. PROJECT NO. BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS ALLTIMES AFTER MILESTONE DATE.PURCHASER OF OUTlOTTO PROVIDE PERMIT DOCUMENTS AND CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE ITEMS WITHIN CONSTRUCTION UMISASSHOANONTHE 3 11 REMOVE STRUCTURE TWIN CITY AREA 651-454-0002 SWPPP REQUIRED BYSTATE/LOCALREOUIREMENTSFORSPEGFK:OIRLpT. PLANS AND DIRECTED PER THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE. TF)O7SSOO1 UTILITY TO BE ABANDONED E 15. NG WATERMAIN TO BE ABANDONED IS TO BE CAPPEDATTHE MAIN ANO BULK GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET SHEET NUMBER •X-X'X'X'X-X HEAD UTILITY TO BE REMOVED HEADED. O 25 SO 100 EXISTINGTREE 16. CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE EXISTING CATCH 8AWNSANDSORMSEWERCONNECTIONS 6030 111.n✓✓� TOCITYTRUNKUNES. 1 2 3 14 5 6 7 81 9 1 10 11 12 13 14 15 1 16 1 Bill fill f - --- --- zv _ ° _ '-.,, -I.�"-.r-•^^''-�-- � eEE UTICA AVENUE Is ..,NUE SOU Ti -.. ,:o.�,.. �.�. /; `.; -- "• s IMPROVElENT PLANE pTtCA A E 1-'H _._.��.... _ �'....... _ .- - 10 DRAINAGE i .._. ��.».._.._. ._....., - € UTILITY EASEMENT �•� -- - pm AM _ - _ ,v onAnAGea -- •;--K= Rowo®CAnaN ❑ B - # LOT 2-RESIDENTIAL PHASE 2 ❑ ❑ 6STORIES-164UNITS j d F-1 31 I LINEAR PARK -WOOIVERF PRIVATELY OWN ED :1I ' Li PUBLIC OPEN SPACE ,�I _ I Lm p ( u� GE EASEnENT fix' REFER TO OFF-SITE Q p PLANS RESIDENTIAL POOL D _ I - r� AMENITYAREA OUTLOT A OFFICE OUTLOT A-OFFICE I <#o PHASE 2 PHASE 1 I r IA I o 4 � n .. .. I -I I i #[ ?!i t'. ❑ I OP/JNME6 g�g UT1LffY FASEMEM � IC S .. -[ •' = I i _ ° 1F�.+.CIJN'l C��,eT[11^�� I EJ # -- �4.+ss�� L.(J�LNE , < rr mwATSRMaN i,-�. LOT 1- i � st EXISTING / EASEMENT a d I RE 1 _ �__- a sa € D a HEALTH ' RESIDENTIAL PHASE - . C 6STORIES-199 UNITS - �,�..:._-__.R n - // .woRAwloEa @pB ' ° I / OUTLOT A LOT 3-HOTEL ... JRJirEA®BIT 80, PARTNERS 6STORIES-150ROOMS 30-UNDERGROUND STALLS ag r J l F , CITY OF s m. t _ -- r]Win, �L VALLEY t -1.- // FVARVALIEg III I . ACCI o 16 BUILDING BETeAGK I I .. •- -- ----------- I� �� E.rv:.�-•+++++ 41 DRAINAGE RESIDENTIAL POOL S UTILITY EASEMENT �I.1 eTAnoN - I I IC AMENITYAREA -7 I r✓ - �3� �n EXISTING ACCESS EasvvTr �•I I ' 'W - l It 5 , LLJr El .- ��_/ _ ¢s J I Is I ^^ LA EASEMENT I C I .... EXISTING ACCESS I � � Q DRIVE I ir, 17 G - Lij Iv DRAWAGE a _ _-_ - I Ir---�•-/ k UTRRY[A6EMENT STATE H1 GHy�AY 1 z 00 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET ExISTr4G VA.eLw/ 0 25 50 100 w HIGHWAY 100 UNDERPASS E SITE NOTES w> > _J ALL CONTRACTORS MUST CONTACT > Z Q J: 1.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROTECTIONOFALLPROPERTYCORNERS. 10.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REPAIRING THE DAMAGE DONETO ANY EXISTING W F_ s GOPHER STATE CALL ONE CENTRAL PARK WEST SITE DATATABLE ALERT TO CONTRACTOR. ITEM DURING CONSTRUCTION,SUCH AS,BUT NOTUMITEDTO,DRAINAGE,UTILITIES, Y Z MN TOLL FREE 1-800-252-1165 1, TH E PRESENCE OF GROUNDWATER SHOULD BE ANTICIPATED ON THIS PROJECT CONTRACTOR'S BIO 2.CONTRACTOR SHALL MATCH PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER,CONCRETE AND PAVEMENT PAVEMENT,STRIPING,CURB,ETC.REPAIRSSHALLBE EQUAL TO,OR BErtER THAN, J w BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS SHA LL INCLUDE CONSIDERATION FOR THIS ISSUE.MEN PERFORMING GRADING OPERATIONS TO EXISTING IN GRADE AND ALIGNMENT. EXISTING CONDITIONS.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO DOCUMENTALL EXISTING Q LOT TOTAL AREA PERVIOUS AREA IMPERVIOUS AREA DURING PERIODS OF WET WEATHER,PROVIDE ADEQUATE DEWATERING,DRAINAGE AND GROUND DAMAGE AND NOTIFY CONSTRUCTION MANAGER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION START. (L �On _� TWIN CITY AREA 651-454-0002 WATER MANAGEMENT TO CONTROL MOISTURE OF SOILS.REFER TO MASTER SITE SPECIFICATIONS 3.CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE EXISTING PAVEMENTANDCONCRETE INACOW1kNCE L_l OUTLOT A-FUTURE OFFICE 6.90 ACRES 1.20 ACRES 5.]O ACRES WITH SPECIFICATIONS. 11.CONTRACTOR SHALL TOUCH-UP PAINT ON ALL LIGHT POLE BASES,FIRE HYDRANTS AND J Fn 5 LOT 1-PHASE I RESIDENTIAL 3.M ACRES 0.88 ACRES 2.57 ACRES 2. ALL GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED(EARTHWORK FINAL UTILITIES,AND FINAL CURSSWHICHARECURRENTLYPAINTED.COSTSHALLBEINCLUDEDIN THE BPSE SID. Q Y W S GRADING)BY THE MILESTONE DATE IN PROJECT DOCUMENTS.OUROTAREATO BE KEPT FREE OF 4.THE EARTHWORKFOR ALL BUILDING FOUNDATIONSANDSUBS SHALL BE IN 1' a LEGEND LOT 2-PHASE 2 RESIDENTIAL 1.53 ACRES 0.35 ACRES 1.18 ACRES JOB TRAILERS AND STORAGE AFTER THE CONTRACT MILESTONE DATE FORTMEO=T.GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH SPECIFICATIONS. 12.CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE OR RELOCATE,WHEN APPUCABIE,ALL EXISTING BUILDINGS, I- Q LOT 3.FUTURE HOTEL 1.61 ACRES 0.39 ACRES 1.22 ACRES CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE CLEAR ACCESS FOR OUTLOT CONTRACTOR TOTHESPECIFlC PARCELAT FOUNDATIONS,BASEMENTS,CONNECTING IMPROVEMENTS,DRAIN PIPES,SANITARY Z d U ALL TIMES AFTER MILESTONE DATE.PURCHASER OFOUTWTTOPROVIDEPERMRDOCUMENT3U AND 5.CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PNS FOR ACTUAL BUILDING AND SEWER PIPES,POWER POLES,AND GUY WIRES,WATER METERS AND WATER LINES, J -- CITY PROPERTY UNEIRON TOTAL 13.49 ACRES 2.82 ACRES 10.67ACRES SWPPP REQUIRED BY STATE/LOCAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SPECIFICOUTLOT. SIDEWALK DIMENSIONS,PORCHaID RAMP IDCATIONS. WELLS,SIDEWALKS,SIGN POLES,UNDERGROUND GAS,SEPIICTANKSANDASPHALT, U SHOWN AND NOT SHOWN,WITHIN CONSTRUCTION LIMNS AND WHERE NEEDED,TO E - - LOT LINE 6.GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS TO COORDINATE WITH APPROPRIATE U1`ILT7YCOMPANIES ALLOW FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION AS SHOWN. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION,ADJUSTMENT OR RELOCATION OF OUSTING UTILITIES AS O PROPOSED CUR B AND GUTTER DESIGNATED ON PIANS. 13.CONTRACTOR SHALL FOLLOW ALL LOCAL,STATE AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS IN -J € CENTRAL PARK WEST PARKING DATA TABLE DISPOSING OF DEMOLISHED MATERIALS REMOVED FROM THS SITE. S --�-�- --- - -- --- EXISTING CURBANOGURER ].CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE PIPE BOLLARDS FOR PROTECTION OF ALLABOVEGROUND 9 LOT USE SIZE REQUIRED PARKING REQUIRED PARKING(PER STANDARD COMPACT UTILITIES AND APPURTENANCES IN DRIVEAREAS. 14.DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF CURB UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. UD �----' EXISTING BUILDING LOT SLP CODE) GOLDEN VALLEY CODE) PARKING PARKING ADA PARKING TOTAL PARKING BICYCLE PARKING B.CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PUNS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR 15.CONTRACTOR TO REFER TO LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION PIAN FOR RELOCATIONS DATE LIMITS OF UNDERGRWND PARKING OUTLOTA FUTURE OFFICE- 706.706 BE 2,474 SPACES(3.5 SPACES/1,p005F) 2,827 SPACES(d SPACES/1,[DOSF) 2,446 SPACES 0SPACES 48 SPACES 2,490 SPACES ISM SPACES/1,W3 SF) 265 SPACES(10%OF TOTAL PARKING) ACTUAL LOCATION OF ALL UTILITY ENTRANCES,TO INCLUDE,SAHITARYSEWER AND ADDITIONS. 03/20/2015 WTI PHASE I RESIDENTIAL 199UNITS/294ROOMS 294 SPACES(1 SPACE/BEDROOM) 299 SPACES(IS SPACES WNG) 262 SPACES MSPACES 7SPACES 339 SPACES(1.15 SPACESMEDROOM) 230 SPACES(66%OF TOTAL PARKING) LATERALS,DOM ESTIC AND FIRE PROTECTION WATER SERVICE,ELECTRICAL NATURAL STOP 84R L0T2 PHASE 164 UNITS/232 ROOMS 2325PACE5(1 SPACE/BEDROOM 2de SPACES,SSPACESA7NEWNG GASANDTELEPHONESERVICE.CONTRACTOR SHALLOOORDINATEINSTAWTKONOF 16,PUNS SUBMITTED FOR PERMITTING SMALL MEETTHECTTYSCODESANDML PROJECT NO. K $ ) 175 SPACES W SPACES 7 SPACES 236 SPACES(1 02 SPACES/BEDROOM) 188 SPACES(80%OF TOTAL PARKING) UTILITIES IN SUCH A MANNER AS TO AVOID CONFLICTS ANDASSURE PROPER DEPTHS APPLICABLE BUILDING CODES IN EFFECTATTHE TIME. 160755001 U DIRECTIONALARROVI LOTS EL'FUTURE HOT150 ROOMS 225(1.5 SPACE ODM) 225 SPACES(15 SPACES/UNIT) 219 SPACES 0SPACES 6SPACES 225-SPACES(IM SPACES/ROOM) 0 SPACES(0%OF TOTAL PARKING) ARE ACHIEVED,AS WELL AS COORDINATE WITH ANY U1`U7Y COMPANIES EOR E ROW DEDICATION TOTAL 3,225 SPACES 3,597 SPACES 3,102 SPACES 120 SPACES 68 SPACES 3,294 SPACES 683 SPACES(21%OF TOTAL PKG) APPROVED LOCATIONS AND SCHEDULING OF TINNSCONNECTONS TOTMEIR SHEET NUMBER 8 FACILITES. 'TO MEET THE PARKING RATIO FOR THE FUTUREHOTEL,140SHARED PARKING SPACES IN ADDITION TO THE APPROVED 35't,OpOARE PROVIDED IN SAME. 6040 ROW VACATION THE RAMP BASED ON A 150-KEY HOTEL ACTUAL SHAR ED SPACES IN THE RAMP WILL BEADIUSTEDBSEDON FINALHOTELPLANSANDROOMCOUNT. 9,CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL GOVERNING CODES AND BE CONSTRUCTED TO 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 � 1 KEYNOTE LEGEND LEGEND ` SERVICE AREA(DELIVERIES,REFUSE,AND '+ 1 CITY PROPERTY UNEIRON -•• .s. ,a� I • Q MOVE-IN STAGING) .- - A QSTLOT LINE •^c-T+r""'�^F"" + Y.`.�. l .; IRI .. FULL ACCESS DRIVEWAY.SEE .LOUIS PARK - - ,;'- ..• ! � „- � L.1 2 STANDARD PLATE ST-2 PROPOSED CURB ANDGUTTER .."'�....:^�.. .....�r..�..��."�o..�_..,....,. ,�.._- ....,- ` '• -•_r�� OPROPOSED CONCRETE S SIDEWALK UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.SEE DETAILSHEET® EXISTING CURB ANOGUTTER46B8F am AC) 1 S, Q4 PARKING RAMP ENTRY IEXIT T-TT` EXISTING BUILDING UTICA AVENUE SOUTH s gpyyAGrlw - x O SERVICE VEHICLES ONLY - LIMITS OF UNDERGROUND PARKING - ... ��( _ °� OOORDINATE PEDESTRIAN Q ADA CURB RAMP.SEE DETAILSHEEIS STOP BS = ACCE88 T01ST BOOR M _ r 6 eo4•�soas. 14 14 81 9 1014'DW 91 Llif18 WRH ARCFI QSTALL COUNT F MININI4T 3 _ Q7 NOT USED. T„ _'%" 133 SF 01 A B d DIRECTIONALARRON :;'.�-q .......:i+:a". . I' _•' ., :A.. -�.: .T'.. .i t ROW DE>)IICCA 4 O CLOSE EXISTINGDRIVEWAY. VSd h - ROW DEDICATION RF . s Q8 TEMPORARY FENCE ENCLOSING DOG RUN. \rte Tr-.T^ yl------- -- �11 j ROW VACATION ■ "'�'-_', ]*-^_ �' i REFERENCE HARDSCAPE PIANS FOR LIMITS OF PHARE 1 82 I �I BEE LANDSCAPE 10 WOONERFARFA CONCRETE SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS.SEE UTICA •- I URS OF RIWS FOR E Bfi12 CURB ANO GUTTER.SEE DETALSHEET // ! HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT ALL CONTRACTORS MUST CONTACT I`APLJWS FORPN ROVEMENT !�: -- _ wuarERF DEMON GOPHER STATE CALL ONE I r, A�FO eEG LOT 2-RESIDENTIAL PHASE 2 3 O NOT USED MN TOLL FREE 1-800-252-1166 r}` '€+ �A�1 sGBPING _ 6STORIES-164UNITS Q BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS -,°-",I, {( i)_ �10� -_ 1aT 1 s F 6 TWIN CITY AREA 651-454-0002 a;r.'. - 27 "NO PARKING FIRE LANE"SIGN AND STRIPING. {''M I I- - D PING 13 SEE DETAIL SHEETDM. _1. L%+ ^ y C - LINEAR PARK- I ') #• .�L � u+rrsaF I B � � �' 14 BIKE RACK -�•'x f ! I' DRAINAGE 4 UTILITY r n _ .by: uaERGROLRn I w' R� E Q �}, PRIVATELY OWNED - Ir I EASFAQJT _ PAHANGFORP" s FAI NT Y/ ALERT TO CONTRACTOR: ("T PURuCOPENSPACE I _ s 2REeIDENTw I 'r 15 RA ISEDLANDSCAPEPLANTER.SEELANDSCAPE 1`^, " �� ,- PIAN. 1. THE PRESENCE OF GROUNDWATER SHOULD BE ANTICIPATED ON THIS PROJECT.CONTRACTOR'S BID T-� REFER TO OFF-SITE ,FJ� `- ' 27 fr SHALL INCLUDE CONSIDERATION FOR THIS ISSUE.WREN PERFORMING GRADINGOPERATKINS fL". , PLANS As RESIDENTIAL W I _ PEDESTRIANCROSSWALKSWIDEUNLESS DURING PERIODS OF WET WEATHER,PROVIDE ADEQUATE DEWATERING,DRAINAGE AND GROUND i '� QUEST PAfilONO Rte') P OTHERWISE NOTED.SEE DETNLSHEET� WATER MANAGEMENT TO CONTROL MOISTURE OF SOILS.REFERTOMASTERSTTESPECIRCATIONS. ]d 31 - (1YP) 10 .�. ENTRY 3 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE(TYP.)PER 2. ALL GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORKTO BE COMPLETED(EARTHWORK RNALU LtTIES,AND FINAL J '; m.P) v I I' DRAINAGE f UTILITY y -' �,-,- T YiST YT RESIDENTIAL POOL I 'I II 1] FEDERAL AOA STANDARDS WC)MD ORA OING)BY THE MILESTONE DATE IN PROJECT DOCUMENTS.OVfLOT AREATO BE KEPT FREE OF �� EASEMENT '1S II g, G i MINNESOTASTATE BUILDING CODE(2M. JOBTRAILERS AND STORAGE AFTER THE CONTRACT MILESTONE DATE FOR THE OUTLOT.GENERAL IL�:� ,• PMKINO AMENffYAREA I CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE CLEAR ACCESS FOR OUTLOT CONTRACTORTOTHE SPECIM PARCELAT I I I� IT _ ALLTIMESAFTER MILESTONEDATE.PURCHASEROFOUTIOTTOPRWIDEPERMITDOCUMENTSAND P% /-!•f I ,cam I •i 1�, >p� D a Q1S. PAIN TED DMECTIONALARROWS(TYP.)SEE SWPPP REQUIRED BY STATE/LOCAL REQUIREMENBFORSPECIFICOUTUOT 13 e DETAIL SHEETS. I I - `. }3 S 19 PROPOSE D TRANS FORMER PAD II ED 13 6MPNG -- ITYP �p L 1 0 J 22 W DEGREE STANDARD PARKING SPACE :. i 5 20 DIMENSIONS 8x16(T'P.). - . tl'j I V '' _ `� ct . 5 �L-74CLOSED DOG ---r-- S^ at RUN SEEN 9 - L LOTLINE 1 FU1 21 60 DEGREE STANDARD PARKINGSPACE - 'C - I - DIMENSION511.h2(I(TYPJ �. ENTRYTO O t + \ I - I I�- PARKING I 13 J !i ", a`n;- EXIT -< EXITPORCH,SEE ARCHITECTURALPLANSFOR I p �' ,r 11 I I$ LOT 1- % i END srnpnL3 "Gm'--, S EXACT SIZE,LOCATION FOR STOOPS,STAIRS �)` u 5 r i AND/OR RAMPS THAT MAY BE REQUIRED.RAMP j 3 N o w E c PAVEMENTFLUSH WITH TOPOFS DOP. � ) i - I f ry I, EM_n -<- r RESIDENTIAL PHASE 11U j 23 LIGHT POLE.SEE LIGHDNG PLAN - _-- It�? i Ii 6STORIES-199 UNITS LOT 3 nN3 N p�p 30 i�, NT 3 QPOLE, HTI - SHEET 6040 m Q 24 PEDESTRIAN-LEVEL LIGHT PE.SEE LIGNG HOTEL SEE Syp) I: 11 / d PIANSHEETS I o ZmZ v �` � Y c O O OR LANDSCAPE ISLAND.SEE LANDS 'e UNOSCAPE PLAN. -"."� '• I E. � .3._ I M / 8 _ .rr �_ -_ -_ 5.P e O MONUMENT SIGN.REFERENCEUNDSCAPE DSU EASEMENT / d PIAN. .,,,e� I f I_l 0 Q PROPOSED&'DIAMETERBOLLPRDTYPICAL SITE KEY F n 2] UULNLLIEESSSOTHERWISENOTED.SEEIANDSCAPE NTS t I I �a J II 6 ------------------- / v Z N _ 28 'DO NOT ENTER"SIGN.SEE DETAILSHEET®/d. I I �� I / i 06 Ail Im OSTOP SIGN30'N30'(R1-1)ANDWXW(TYP.) I I I(- - I A� SEE DETAIL SHEET 60{0. '�L RESIDENTIAL POOL I �, / ` �I '^J a OTEMPORARY BITUMINOUS CURB AND GUTTER. OV 1 LOT A II AMENITY AREA I ' LCL W SEE DETAIL SHEET. � / � v J OFFICES-SEE SHEET 6040 �'i I f I / /3 w a RESIDENTIAL STOOPS.BE ARCHITECTURAL m f1 r. ` I • 31 PLANS FOR EXACT SIZE,LOCATION.STAIRS, e. � I PROPOSED ACCE98 � _lam �a AND/OR RAMPS THAT MAYBE REQUIRED. �l 43 2 G T ; ' BEGIN I r e SITE PLAN NOTES STRIPING 3o NTq� i e n- PARK / I Y 8 1. ALL WORN AND MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH ALLCffViQQUY REGULATIONS, EASEMENT CODES,AND O.SAA_STANDAIIDS. '00, 2. CONTRACTOR SMALL REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATION LJLRS6FNPHASE 182 +IyYJ if v AND DIMENSIONS OF VESTIBULES,SLOPE PAVING,SIDEWALKS,EXRwP PORCHES,TRUCK I r ROVE].ENTS.SEE UTICA a DOCKS,PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND EXALT BUILDING IfTILITV ENTRANCE 1 I AVUE IMPROVEMENT ) z LOCATIONS. 11 PLANS FOR PAR(DESIGN PROPOSED ACXf88 3. ALL DISTURBED AREAS ARE TO RECEIVE P OFTOPSOIL,SEED,MULCH ANDWATE0. I dY_ eA8E3.1ENr a.1 .�'� C S UNTIL A HEALTHY STAND OF GRASS S ESTABLSHED. 7-{�\\) _ 4. ALL DIMENSIONS AND RADII ARE TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 7 1 > 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL RELOCATIONS(UNLESS OTHERWISE } 4 /) 1S. f W NOTED)INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO,ALL UTILITIES,STORM DRAINAGE,SIGNS, __ u 29 J H TRAFFIC SIGNALS d POLES,ETC.AS REQUIRED,ALLWORKSHALLBE INACCORDANCE h _ /� 2 F- S WITH GOVERNING AUTHORITIES REQUIREMENTSANDSPECIRCATIONS. ____. 4 )I� N I 11 13 / �/ U) C 6. SITE BOUNDARY,TOPOGRAPHY,UTILITYAND ROADINFORMATKJNTAKEN FROMA Q 22 r 3 I / / /✓' i - Sf! SURVEY BYALANDSURVEYOR. LjJ J COMPLETED I ;`-' 2'f- 18 S / /�� ]. CONCRETE JOINTING AND FILLERS TO BE COMPD PER DETAILS. 3:> Z Q --1 I -f- - -T i/ L� EXISTING ACCESS - r T - 5 EASEMENT I I-T-- ' •/ i - ' 0 Z '' 1" - ----- �." i yh Uj REPLACE NO PAVEMENT IN AREAS OF WAYZATA SLVIX/ Q- O CENTRAL PARK WEST SITE DATATABLE 'T -.;:� • / r� :� - REMOVED AS PART OF WATERIMPROVEMExTB. J U` y LOT TOTAL AREA PERVIOUSAREA IMPERVIOUSAREA ULACORIVE(s 3 _ / 11 - _, i CONTRACTGR SHALL OOORDINATE WITH THE CITY / Q W - REGARDING PAVEMENT REMOVALS AND PATCHING. Q 5 �. ,._.".,,. i LOT 1-PHASE I RESIDENTIAL 3.4S ACRES O.BB ACRES 257 ACRES _ o_ LOT 2-PHASE 2RESIDENTIAL 133 ACRES 0.35 ACRES 1.16 ACRES _J/ _ Z J 6 LOT 3-HOTEL 1.61 ACRES 1.39 ACRES 0.22 ACRES W (n Q 3 TOTAL 6.59 ACRES 2.62 ACRES 3.97 ACRES \ <> `'- U e ----1 r e e -s:. Z O § _ J 18 w YZATABLwal� i ~ 3 CENTRAL PARK WEST PARKING DATATABLE ;I SIDEWALK 2 REQUIRED DATE _ REQUIRED PARKING PARKING(PER STANDARD COMPACT 03/20/2015 LOT USE SIZE (PER SLP CODE) GOLDEN VALLEY PARKING PARKING ADA PARKING TOTAL PARKING BICYCLE PARKING `fY jpp - PROJECT N0. K a CODE) _ GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 160755001 294 SPACES(1 299 SPACES(1.5 0 20 40 BO SHEET NUMBER ` LOT PHASEIRESIDENTWL 199UNITS/294ROOMS SPACE/SEDROOM) SPACES/DWEWNG) 262 SPACES ]O SPACES 7SPACES MS SPACES(1.15SPACESMEDROOM) 230 SPACES(W%OF TOTALPARIONG) EXISTING WAYZATA BLVD/ E 232 SPACES(1 246 SPACES(1.5 HIGHWAY 100 L1NDL3iPA88 v° LOT2 PHASE2RESIDENTIAL 164UNITS/232ROQMS SPACE/BEDROOM) SPACESIDWEWNG) IMSPACES SO SPACES 7SPACES 2.SPACES(1.O2SPACESSEDROOMJ 18BSPALES(80%OFTOTALPARKING) 6041 TOTAL 526 SPACES 545 SPACES 437 SPACES 120 SPACES 14 SPACES 575 SPACES 418 SPACES(73%OF TOTAL PKG) MIN.10' MAX.30'COMMERCIAL I I ` ` PAG ION JC'NIS_ EXP ii`,SK!l JOIN p. , „ 8"CONC.SIOSF:WALK A, .- ,�;-Li -f)U�.II'i l^rl I � ' 5" CONCRETE 6" CONCRETE PIU C. H:3 LENGIH %/' PROVIDE DOWELS BETWEEN PROVIDE DOWELS BETWEEN L CVLR 1C FT. .- PAVEMENT SECTIONS PAVEMENT SECTIONS 'I 4" MNOOT SPEC 3138 8'BOULEVARDA / 4" MNDOT SPEC 3138 SLAB ;,. CL. 5 AGGREGATE BASE CL 5 AGGREGATE BASE 1/2"E ANSION BOULEVARD %; — 10'RAD.COMMERCIAL <` _ APPROVED SUBGRADE _ APPROVED SUBGRADE III—III- I f nw.11".rorfnm,,. I I=III= a - � 1 I — �mx.:,'_•MNr, r:Ptr z�'nmeer.x•r..Yn — 1 I 1 'J:F mx_i OY aca A,icr AW OMrn+MPrF�mr. % � - -"�! • I I 1 .�Rau:aa,nadNMU_:ni PtR+•aD,RIPWpvxn "M" b-s alf Tf•.ak c}M•-:Mrt:. -1_& - LIGHT DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT i,�'"' � HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT I1M4., SEE GEOTECH REPORT Vv W.,zR� SEE GEOTECH REPORT y� EXPANSION JOINT I, 1~� 5 Li CENTER CONTROL JOINTS TO --"''�'O HEHA.N IE_ <,al W.Wrn "��REEe 3 O S BE USED ONLY ON DRIVES WITH SIDEWALK SAWCUT AND PATCH i-2 (;()I',IF'/';G ()V C ,eTV ESEc: _ qes OVER 1Y IN WIDTH WITH BIT.WEAR PATCH MIX. (J Q I I S..F=OzT=D ::. �.^-..,KFT i 1.5' OF MNDOT SPEC 2360 BITUMINOUS .,:MI>tA,R,uv,:r•�s ��, 1.5' OF MNDOT SPEC 2360 BITUMINOUS (2'TYPICAL) Y O. JCINTS I I I WEARING COURSE SPVEB240B •A:ve-laYat_�r Awes x Y A. WEARING COURSE SPWE8240B Y ° END APRON A -- nw'ro10u-AnryxWYM rox ron xn 31vo w�A6 03x03H0w 341S32i 0l4 0 $o IVIINm S�I V��Q o C7 NR[LY¢•J"s]p„rAJCNaYXnow[ sew AG WVHa NW`A3IIVA N3a10E)/MVd sinm '1S po wr Z O 'V1053NNIn JO UJO `��t■ 31V15—-M 3 AYIO'V% Itl1V LL�ONY YNDI5Na3dn5 Mwe A9 0313J`IS30 W H i .3.10 AX a30W tl0 3X%03Wd3Nd SYM 1NOd3tl N V�d 3l I S 1S3M MVd WV JiN30 o a N NO N-3Lx�3d5'NVId 51N1 1VHl A 30 Aa3MH I 3lV�S In a a y Wga g g go. gW $ o if s N N W a „ ='e o < m a ka i s o N o 0 5.sU� oa a ti u FtR ad j erg o .$iq�,: g $5 �' �_ � W �;� ov m �=�:ag N gs gso„ gs v _ s M oos�a _ sa a"Rm y� J„3 aax ffi a y ; g :Qm: =tok �: a am g=c� x _. a -3�=a a vm ffo C”-?g•_., '.Y 8 W6�6 S gma W, „ '�=g g��a g S w w 3g a„"W. fi `a : :s � .$J Xi s g .off.as gag x s s a t-,-c xg „ = Wag ay ergo o- Z m A x ”��g $��g g� a 'g a�� g� e a��g g ss�'>s� .m a � � ��' •� w " s:o F_ �s Nd C.,�=�� W� 4 a W_ a� O 00 00®@(D® ® © o 00000 O O O o N N I I gp � _ g W 00 g III��p 1I F OD l�I,c OS Ory 0 WW Yr©�y 'g 1 �� 3� 3 ©2 „ a Wz N ]OYJMS]IYYxIVM < U.Q.. w mQZ. �u Z •••-.•• es° z� r �m 3 v � tj z 6$ E � 0 am •tpi� I ¢ ag " �T_ :,.._. Q S FS $g El dam: 0 a: ^9 0 0 o-J O .... igm o - g z os: 'iI '=C m� „ O O r "Ag 0 � yg a3 d o ..A n �Jx ag a¢ g: F ag a9 s s -W a ell-§ 0 W-5g s Nc� i O �3:a=e s W' H-sr? je z 3a Nys ggg¢o :� a:. dg � m g$ �w3 _ s sk Wyss' cv , ga 9 :n O s= s� s:;_, ao a oQ�s u �8 Nig V azo �,a "sags- W .� z Ell gg El <`s rl � 8$$ � 'x^a ��c o Ute" �asx a$ ag H. As °- O N g -`�. "r Rags- " �` X10 W �oaiggggsa_€y o ega="Vie soy a a g=�: z.rapc3�s_We a o ag a m ay 4 y: r� JA iegm o t� 0 ��g r a 4�a� 4�Wpm� g�-•W Z y �y s"Wm^> _ `a�oyo- - o„� �ag€sgegsgg F �s `gS.9-a 'b_H2 a:W" #5 is3:0 O 00 000 0 as.?4;i H 'b_Ha v_ Q Gee00000®O® po „'o w AVJW15 31VrxIYN �>! � I c bQ `-� •••t NO ltB xnN-NON • ® t i I W u -`� •� ” m `. M ® - z z" �;..,. y+.. �`..',,• ��C �� Ml g l „Ju 5 SWC z,ew H J Q V ® Qq z > NIO I0W ®� - a „�- a �g � "� Q< :s' ,..•.,.. _L(j) o a 09A �18 .18 1 1 EI g g4 g0 's gs, s's is g 6 ..v a w.d aJx=.a.I w AN,c.aN.:w y•.=nN..w w.N.vJ.w w .�a..N ww....d. WM1 Ln ¢ NX :a1V0 AB 03N33HJ -IVLLN341S321 Ola p �6 V1� X o sew Ae NMvaa S,Id13 Q NW'Adll dA N3a10`Jn1atld SI(101 '1S oN uLn O UJOHt am �v1S 3H1—1 AW V"SO 11rHl pn WI-dns MW8Ae 43NDIS30 Nb�l d 3 l I S 1S3M)12itld lb'�1N3`� o a`O N � �� •n 1J3aq AX tl3RM1{q 3X A9 p3Wd3tld SYM 1xOd311 a0 WLLVJlfg3d9'NYM SIHI 1rH1 AaLLtl3J AB3113H 31YOS s sal J§ Z ��d �I 5 ! Z Z Q N Fa a C39 (Z9 M�� 1 ` W It, J spa p N U Y O g 0 t!1 pi p cr • ` g a s U 4 a x �¢� Q a R p i-M .69 Z 4 01 cr g$g � Q >� ` ENV � � �� g lYko = Q J �o2 Z .12 Fn lw� W Z CN INs z lL k A-.r gF Vr p :� Z J < Q Q e "s ZWLa YW ti . W r� _� a0Y ZZLa. J dJp Qw � w_M .Of r� L I"A13 ery LL 9 3 L s Q 1 f. gP _ - 0 4 } $ § _ Qc n UJ Z G�R Y'.j 3 w a 88 Fj ga> " ~ O Q 9w Y a. to z d g seo � sa Ria dsea a a� ' Q§ a � HE d � Ig 9,1;Jil� Wa In � .` sg 6s ga s i' ss�e� �' tl yy s g w y W :�'✓ m ' : �� q9 u o �P6 m�i`Y k"4 $ SSM <5a A S 3 �o a s• s =: aY p z o 1 r m - k ds 3 T CL _ %'/ m sig . g ar�a�ag fk�a ��spea3 ag xs3 � „ wa kx. w a W _ a y �mkine>> y $_ _ c;....:i Q w � k :emsodPW$ �' 00 � (:s:.l k i w o P'11 N f7 fm-j ��. W tlm A _ ,• n Z g Hr�� u S / a� ♦u�Wal1 xi9{x:x>ranra Wiz¢ - - xtlPa �x - ME _ •• sW ��f8�o'�- 6�`88�:N YYgy �=a�Wx _ inu i �dI' vWoiW u odo�4u m 3�- oo d�mry =zY' u ,"� mw Y e - -.Ascn g ax; s o O �w C m 0 &a sv MUM MUM a I y I - S 62-R si al gR s W P1 P. .• ....013x10 1191 "N016x]XI(1 ..„a i m a EI ]6AI a�aa a3iav,a 1x91r� a9a�91xxr1a a u3 owx.le F g3"YW�oY of I I�b e1 419vii InpV{M v9 IIOHc'a ValplawaV pup wpH_(vIwIN AV........P.P-uP13pzHeylnp-M.Jro A luaweaaP.11{u 11—.du Puo 1p•rva p -d awa 11 4-- le P pee vveNntl aUlaatla vVl+W flop Pup eltlaauea vy1 Nlw 1a416p1'luawmep q4l t� UTICA AAV NUE 1 � p w , 3 »--�— »' - --- — ---- ----- — — -- — -- -- - --___ LOT 2-RESIDENTIAL PHASE 2 50s 0 FFE=882.00 I II I it lz LIN EAR PARK- WOONERF y ) PRIVATELYOWNED I + PUBLIC OPEN SPACE Ix REFER TO OFF-SITE •I : '"I I+ L PLANS .. I ❑ ❑ - �_ .'` I9 I' +` O a OUTLOT A-OFFICE OUTLOT A-OFFICE_ 1 Ij PHASE 2 PHASE 1 E - f FFE-888.50 FFE-885.50 j LOT 1 I EXISTING // ,3r ; I a a RESIDENTIAL PHASE 1 1i HEALTH lat FFE=882.00 LOT HOTELAcs € PARTNERS .L- ,�' 1! I i �(Q\r i I 35 FFE=882.00 CITY OF ST.LOUIS PARK — _ I CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY - :. I I r I 's / w r Z Lu GRADING NOTES `— SATE yw�N _ — j / - _.m J�/�� r=f! %�/ ® Q c 1. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OFGOLOEN VALLEY Of �- ------ ~- ANDST.LOUIS PARK SPECIFICATIONS AND BUILDING PERMITREQUIREMENTS.NARK 'E WITHIN WAYZATA BOULEVARD WILL REQUIREAMNDOT ROWAJTLTTY PERMIT. 5 2. CONTRACTOR TO CALL'GOPHER STATE ONE CAL L'ATLEA.STTWO WORWNG DAYS n Z PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS.TIMNCITIES METRO LEGEND AREA:651.454-0002 OR TOLL FREE:1-00652-1166 F 3. 00 TRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONSANDELEVATONS OR EXISTING — — PROPERTY UNE }m UTILTTES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO THE STARTOF SITE GRADING.THE uJ S CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFYTHE PROJECT ENGINEER OFANY CITY LIMITUNE -J i DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS. ,-1 L 4. SUBGRADE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER EXCAVATION TO -- �— -�- EXISTING CONTOUR Q "..XXXx' w N El OFFSET ANY STABILITY PROBLEMS DUE TO WATER SEEPAGE OR STEEP SLOPES. _ �- J WHENPLACING NEW SURFACE MATERIAL ADJACENTTO EXISTING PAVEMENT,THE - �— PROPOSED CONTOUR z < EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED PROMPTLY TO AVOID UNDERMINING OF EXISTING ( Lij PAVEMENT. Y 0 EXISTING CURB ANDGUTTER Z e 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL HORQONTALAND VERTAALCDNTROI - - Qof 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL EXCAVATE DRAINAGE TRENCHESTOFOLLOWPROPOSEDSTORM �'�'� EXISTING BUILDING a O s SEWER ALIGNMENTS. J (n y EWEYLLJ ]. GRADES SHOWN ARE FINISHED GRADES.CONTRACTOR SHALL ROUGH GRADE TO PROPOSED STORMSR PIPE a' 3 SUBGRADE ELEVATION,LEAVE STREET READY FOR SUBBASE. D- Q ` » EXISTING STORM SEWER PIPE a (� 8. ALL EXCESS MATERIAL,BITUMINOUS SURFACING,CONCRETE ITEMS,ANY ABANDONED Z J UTILITY ITEMS,AND OTHER UNSTABLE MATERIALS SHALL BECOMETHE PROPERTY OF ® PROPOSED MANHOLE LLI (n Q o THE CONTRACTOR AND S HALL BE DISPOSED OFOFFTHE CANSTRUCTAN SITE. ■ PROPOSED CURWAREAINLET U E B. REFER TO THE UTILITY PLAN FOR SANITARYSEWER MAIN,WATER MAIN SERVICE LAYOUTAND ELEVATIONS AND CASTING/ST111=RE SCHEDULE. PROPOSED SIPHONK:MANHOLE ALERT TO CONTRACTOR: Z 10, CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTIONOFPAVEMENISANDCURBAND %JOL16 PROPOSEDSLOPE 1. THE PRESENCE OF GROUNDWATER SHOULD BE ANTICIPATEDONTHISPROJECT.CONTACrOR'S BID O 3 GUTTER WITH SMOOTH UNIFORM SLOPES WITH PROVIDE POSITIVE DRNNAGE. SHA LL INCLUDE CONSIDERATION FOR THIS ISSUE.WHEN PERFORMINGGRADING OPERATIONS 4TJ DURING PERIODS OF WET WEATHER,PROVIDE ADEQUATE DEWATERING DRAINAGE AND GROUND $ 11. INSTALLA MINIMUM OF 4'MNDOT ClA555 AGGREGATE BASE UNDER CURB AND CBt PROPOSED STORM SEWER STRUCTURE WATER MANAGEMENT TO CONTROL MOISTURE OF SOILS.REFER TO MASTER SITE 6PEGFICATQNS. DATE GUTTER NAME ALL CONTRACTORS MUST CONTACT 03/20/2015 ED, EMERGENCY OVERFLOW ELEVATON 2. ALL GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED(EARTHWORK FINAL UTILITIES.AND FINAL y 12. HAUL ROUTE SHALL BE WAYZAYTA BOULEVARD ANDGAMBLE DRIVE TO PARK PULE GOPHER STATE CALL ONE GRADING)BY THE MILESTONE DATE IN PROJECT DOCUMENTS.OUTLOT AREA TO BE KEPT FREE OF PROJECT NO. a BOULEVARD TO XKiHWAY 3B1. FFE FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION MN TOLL FREE 1-800-252-1166 JOB TRAILERS AND CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE STORAGE AFTER O LEARAC ESSFOR OUTLOTCOONE DAM FOR THE O CNTRACTORTO ESPEIFlCLA PARCELAT GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 160755001 BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS ALL TIMES AFTER MILESTONE DATE.PURCHASER OF OUTLOTTO PROVIDE PERMITDOCUMENTSAND O LS 5O 1OO SHEET NUMBER 13. UPON COMPLETION R ED AR AIONAITE.ND FILLING,CONTRACTORARE SHALLRESTOREALL FUTURE UNDERGEATM TWIN CITY AREA 651-454-0002 SWPPP REQUIRED BYSTATE/LOCAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SPECIFIC OUTLOT. E STREETS AND DISTURBED AREAS ON STE.ALL OISTURBEDAREASSHALL BE STORMWATER TREATMENT RESERVE y RE-VEGETATE DWITHCITYAPPROVEDGROUNDCOVER. AREA 6050 6 E 14. CONTRACTOR IS TO PUCE ALL MANHOLES OUTSIDE OF DRIVING LANES. tJ O O �Yo sHolsln3a IN nm woH-Annex on Hn AGMZ'8 l- StdHd) L ON 3iYa AS 03NO3H0 N3aIS32J 014 Z WU - a voce suesilo ry uexi•,on owe SlW N O r 'IVN-HIn J°MW8 AB-.... NV' d 3 EM ISI a NA'A ]l�VA N3aIo0/>iHVd slno-1 ,ls o�w" z o uaoH((<�(a�w��Y15 3H 0$MVl 3N1 {3W tl3.QU 1YH06_dn a35N3�n Ano r nY 1 1VH1 a1+V nwsna-3 AS 13314011 N O O w A03tl10 AX If30Nr1 Ny 3Vd A9 iVMI tld SVM 3HOd3N 1S3M>QJVd]Vf J1N30 o tl°H°LLY]UI�3d5'NYkI SIHL 1Y3LL A1LLtl3J A93tl3H 1 31Y°S Al S N I a V J V 6 ^ I _ _ ti... _ wAYzgrqin I. NORTH a� J _ INS s an �S \ t w> 6 \\ `T\ \\ \�♦� \ \ \\ LU I 1 O \ \S \ I L \ \ \ II d< 00 O. -a. rn i t o?u I J Z -uJ mN\ O I \\\� L. b •�l \ \\ \ \� l\i\ \ LU, —� F 1 \\ y \ \ ; \` \•\\ ill\•.\` \\\\ LU N LL- 0', e3o a ��,A { Z i \ .g 1 `i\1`l1�•`ll,t t°lz I —NI}� —2{ 0_ �_7 I —B,_ ,– til•. •. ^� \ i,• 1 LJ 1 I 01 w I I 4 r� 4 os H •� il, 11 �1 , \ a 4 _ O I x00 Z- li'�1m °° \ \. (� LL VV I f ¢_ W _ y I N 1 I - e cr- /ter —"r -•E —"' .�' _-- y"� `� -�.�-+1 - -�=i }y - - _ - r I\1`1/ ! �. Ll -- – -- ---- – – - - -- "" a - �1 I Ia ! 10 020 UN -- I iOz OR ut m w {� I rr a — i Irl I 1 11 -, F W � $ uZ� g zO�cZ3o boa �ako�S�t 3 �-ji li'k4 V) i of ugH NX,'. €Z 12 w l �F•••WZ. NW S I M� 0, �w°� w��4 ° w w w w g w a ZW�W W'j ° 8 8 S 8 8 y 0 8 Y o=ooco$ w°'�w - - - w $ w w w & & Z s = B J00 w;Qo po I t % mr m4 mw�LLw� II t a� 00i-oo I II I I I Uw°wo xwp<wqa 3F P I ®• XI H wlx � d ° x x °� aoai wiw�b Z I 1 I �Q�38 oiu� I , Z'o oi°r uoo>h`m w i O(7=ow � aso U° w 8=<°w K I,-wz=i iz�u c ula- iisa "'4xm zea J,w° > €N 9y 2 EzE ° e p n N H \� gY4u ¢ tt g >HE SO 0 '3 og w `a � � � s ` ?� � 2�2 QF � oo€ �w � a iw � ap _LI Mo ° �z l'T Wm55;0 i E w m€ w aa samw �p �?i �i-rc i w NW� bion a��U iw°-�� W HgyIW w w w��o m o rcw °p °Ov o�rc$z2 b pp 1 f I 3 w ma�� va og iym om u a av°ib HOH a� k 1 i i ° zyLL � a = u" a < wN »� '°`i m° S Q� a<°w li> -.�t�....•:{� W tHoo9 wI, n��a 3 H'`� mwm a hz x<a < 8w°d �w s ryNNHHHININ f! w� �'4?° orcss m w ° LLJ a >* P. m o ii° a o 6 op M -J ♦'J�..: re'l f/ wx$ <Op > aa3m �LLvv wo psa ° m'f ox a°oLL� a iiilliiiiL11l1WI11ll m6 °< wag >>wJ x xW <� i Si rcg s -'L� t o o� 3 m 8 B 8 oa ooq azza w -.ao Pw u_% o_3Ea. p, Z hN� �° uw=" 4 �, w Nn� �o ° �� s OH01H11H11N11N11HyyIHWI UI yp< ow ONOi VD o oc7 4Wa F O� a F° a OF I 1011flfllf0m Ilflll Z �3 ~°3 waw 9waa u <a h �t oa u3 °P? °mow rc wwwog ao >� w o �� uwo °u 4 mrL Q zt Faa u58o n,�3 a 8 ow �m �i'� �° o� �� gwo: ° °3oOO �0 8 3 8 a o $ JNNHHNNNI rr�� aa3 Sp uw u'w a°� a5 uu ?o i� u ugum° �y ` �r C9 ry M 4 6w w _ _ _ §', ?r•T cul'wlolxaay Pw uoH-•{aIwIN of e11wA1)roVilu aV IWVa'aui YVWPvary Pun uroH-AaIUYN eV uolleidopu Puu uulleeluaVlro wlyyn IroV)W lwwroop a143 uo aauglai aadoatlwl Pw/o.—I-Pv,odud awa ll 4aIVx,o �Ulaadv v41+ul Aluo P.Pw14 al'aaWaa♦a ivawryaul u •ula�v4 Paluna,d au6lcaP Puo cldcuuoa ayl 411a,a43a6o1•1 aoP c s E i Lm E 4 A Nyg� B 5 k i>8o 8 DESIGN OR EXISTING GRADE NOTN �5 PIPE SHALL BE CENTERED UNDER o'o€ INSULATION UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. <g 3 n b �m ' w � � z. E °a > MINIMUM 4"SAND FILL COVER OVER PIPE - WIDTH OF INSULATING BOARD- b EgS 3 MINIMUM 2' it' FN<�e _ -----------_ _ ___ -YSTOL AM T SANG FILL \ INS ATI 3' >ioW RIGID INSULATION lo zz 4 7 a 5' 5' 3 J °3 S 6' VARIES G INSULATION DETAILr 9 3'-4" MANHOLE OR CATCH BASIN COVER z STANDARD PLATE N0. 4020)R 4022A f BACKFILL 7/9" p°p°p°p �S .I 0 0 0 0 0 0 o v p p p p p � 12" OR 1/4 Bc _ opo opop popo, >}•DIA UFT HOLE v' n W C� 0 0 e� 3 STACKING LUGS (WHICHEVER IS GREATER .J FRAME, �j R ME GRATE AN p p p p 11 p p D CURB BOX TO n p O 120'APART J W BE NEENAH FOUNDRY COMPANY S�gS� S� S� S� 25 3/4• \ If u�lf U (J 1 N0.R-3067 WITH TYPE R GRATE OR op p pn p pop p p p p p 12'� MIN. Q APPROVED EQUAL RUSE TYPE L IF tJ ! � IN A HIGH FLOW AREA). ❑ o o C o p \ A A "DRIVEWAY INLETS USE NEENAH I R-3290-A OR APPROVED EQUAL. A A �popopop o�o�o�C \ \ Q W 1 ,popopopo 0=0= ,3/16" Ill P D O D p p�p�p�p COMPACTED GRANULAR Z Q PLAN VIEW(MINUS GRATE) opopopopopopopcpo j ENCASEMENT e PLAN VIEWopopopopo�cpopo \ STORM \ opo�o��opo / SEWER COMPACTED GRANULAR .@ EXTERNAL SEAL \ BEDDING Q - HDPE ADJUSTING RINGS MAY BE USED AS REQUIRED(MIN 2-2",MAX. INSTALL INFI-SHIELD T a 5-2" HEIGHT). LADTECH GLUE(PER INSTRUCTIONS)SHALL BE UNI-BAND(OR EQUAL) CASTING TO BE NEENAH FOUNDRY M \ APPLIED BETWEEN EACH HDPE ADJUSTING RING. CONCRETE ADJUSTING SEE NOTE BELOW(MH SHOWN) ��LETTERS 1/4 BC MIN. Z 5 RINGS MAY BE USED, MINIMUM I"MORTAR BETWEEN CASTING, ADJUSTMENT RINGS(MIN. 2. MAX. 3) RAISED FLUSH WITH _ CONCRETE ADJUSTING RINGS, AND STRUCTURE,MIN 4"AND MAX. 10" EXTERNAL SEAL TOP SURFACE <<\\<N\\\�\i\�\ � IN HEIGHT FOR CONCRETE ADJUSTMENT RINGS. (NON-SHRINKING INSTALL INFI-SHIELD W GROUT REQ.). EXTERNAL SEAL SHALL BE INSTALLED IN CONJUNCTION 27" GATOR WRAP OR EQUAL) UNDISTURBED GROUND J WITH ADJUSTING RINGS AND CASTING ASSEMBLY. PRECAST REQUIRED UNLESS NOTE: J a'1ro1/s �APPROVED BY ENGINEER. ALL PIPES SHALL BE BEDDED IN THE EXISTING POORLY GRADED W � E 0.2'SUMP w SANDS. SUBCUT BELOW PIPES A MINIMUM OF 1FT AND BACKFILL _j CONCRETE COLLAR TO ENCASE m CASTING AND RINGS. CURB MIX '� a MACH.GROOVE IN W � Z Q WITH POORLY GRADED SANDS. = SHALL BE USED FOR CONCRETE 'ti a UD SEAT FOR r Y Q Z COLLAR. 2 ADJUSTING RINGS(TYPICAL) > DIA.POLYISOPRENE !Y J W EXTERNAL SEAL * PIPE BEDDING (CLASS B) a O Q EXTERNAL SEAL a INSTALL INFI SHETLD 2^ 40 DUROME ER uT UNI-BAND(OR EQUAL). 1NEENAH CASTING N0. FOR RCP STORM SEWER J !� 8 -NOTE INSTALL INFI-SHEILD a ,+ Q W UNI-SAND(OR EQUAL). > SLOPE BENCHES 2"PER FOOT. R-1733 WITH A SELF SEALING < Q' STRUCTURE TO BE PRECAST (O-RING GASKET) ONE HOLE LID $t.Louis Park PUBLISH PLATE I- Q +•"•=` io SECTION A-A NO. R-1733. LID SHALL READ: STORM SEWER ,...._..` �).. ff."L OTA DATE NO. Z d J STORM SEWER, SEE SS-1. PLATEN LID, LETTERED - --- ENGINEERING 1/23/2014 55-1 W (n 0 MECHANICALLY COMPACT 4" 2. FRAME, GRATE k CURB BOX R-1733 CONCRETE COLLAR TO ENCASE $ECTION`A-A GRANULAR MATERIAL FOR TO BE NEENAH FOUNDRY CO. N0. U STORM SEWER PIPE. CURB MIX DOGHOUSES TO BE GROUTED SHALL BE USED FOR CONCRETE LEVELING(MN/DOT 3149.2F) OUTSIDE AND INSIDE. TOP OF R-3067 WITH TYPE V GRATE FOR O COLLAR. (ORDINARY COMPACTION). BARRELL SECTION UNDER TOP LOW POINTS. J SLAB TO HAVE FLAT TOP EDGE SEALED NTH 2 BEADS 3 RAM-NEK OR A PROVEDF (/) 5 EQUAL. DATE s 03/20/2015 PUBUSH PLATE PUBLISH PLATE PROJECT NO. ffSt.Louis Park TYPE B CATCH BASIN GATE NO. //y//St.Louis Park DATE No. 160755001 MINNESOTA J4 MINNESOTA TYPE C MANHOLE/CATCH BASIN r ENGINEERING 1/23/2014 55-2 1/23/2014 SS-3 SHEET NUMBER E ENGINEERING 6052 • ,,." :v,a,�\\ EXISTINGFI RE I-.\yn♦1\ ♦\ \\♦♦.. ```{'`� l tLi�.a\\♦.♦..\\.....♦\\as.E\X�IS\TI\NG _I HYDRANT_ MroroNrFIRE HYDRANT - - - _ <<— ifI - - - —r -- it I 1 UTICA AVENUE EXISTING FIRE 10'DRAINAGE& _y.. 0 t .-L I I- HYDRANT•I -I UTILITY EASEMENT77 •� 't I - v If _ --- -- — — ---- ----- -•E- ---�— a it I2 it El 7 UTILITY EASEMENTFt�- `• « - OUTLOT A-OFFICE al III I LOT 2-RESIDENTIAL i I Ji I I' .1 PHASE 1 �. 7( 1I ;I I PHASE 2 IA s EXISTING FIRE DRAINAGES FFE=882.00 i FEE=885.50 t i unuTV EASEMENT ❑ ❑ HroRANr STORMWATERpl; TREATMENT I II , p ( I EASEMENT -I I I I ff DRAINAGE& O OUTLOT A- " " _ I �I UTILITY EASEMENT -� I d5'ORAINPOEd OFFICE PHASE Z jo UNDERGROUND i ,E - IT PROPOKD ❑ ❑ - _ ------- I 1 UTILITY EASEMENT DETENTION j� FFE=888.50 I I I F (' ^ Y / / DRAINAGE& ---� - t-� UTILITY EASEMENT J1j; I t I 13 PROPOSED I ❑ I ffy1i�Q/fI/ UNDERGROUND I ❑ I �, W/'1I CISTERN i o - p — — ` �' g� v 'I „ w 20'WATERMAIN / / O LOT 1-RESIDENTIAL PHASE 1 LOT 3-HOTEL ,�` li; 3 \ 1,-ss� �1 I - o-w-I -w.• II. I FFE-882.00 FFE�82.00 A - E)09HY i - CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK a — '` CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEYa PROPOSED FIREHYDRANT as PROPOSED FIRE HYDRAN 10DML",Lm � yO1 ••-.f.. �II I { T G' •�/ I .�:3i'$ N o` .1 1 f{ I • �� E EXISTING NOES c ' SANITARYSEWER L~u !lI HYDFIRELIFT STATION J EXISTING EXISTING RANT EASCMENN IIEEW UTILITY — EASEMENT ...... IT a � EJ06TNOR■E � _ - EXI1TI1GACCE55W ------ - - / / j.✓Ii �� / EASEMENT I / 7 • J 1 jK-' UTILITY NOTES 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALLAT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO c EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION FOR EXISTING UNDERGROINOUDLITYLOCATIONS.TWINCTTIES METRO AREA:812-456 OR TOLL FREE:1b0P252-1105 EXISTING FIRE v Z. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION,THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELOVERIFYALLEXISTING URUTY "�`� 1G DRAINAGE 8 "�.. - ///f~ HYDRANT.iI�,�'''' z ` LOCATIONS AND ILL BE RESHOWNPORTED TO NOT SHOWN.ANY DISCREPANCY BETWEEN PUNS AND REM UTILITY EASEMENT ,� �-_ // - —"- iC E THE DITIONS CONTRACTOR SHALL PORTED TETHE LOCATIONS OJECT NSAND ELEER VAMONOWTELV. -��_ •3. PRIORT CONSTRUCTION VERIFYTHEC N CATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OFTME BUILDING PIPE SYSTEM } PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION SERVICE CONNECTIONS. 4, ALL STORM SEWER AND APPURTENANCES MUST BEFURNISHEDANDIN5TALEDINACCORDANCE LEGEND J WITH THE CITY OF ST.LOUIS PARK AND MOST RECENT REVISION OFTHE"CITY ENGINEERS J i ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA"(CEAM)STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR U71-7Y CONSTRUCTION. _- PROPERTY LINE/ROW Q \ 5. WATERMAIN SHALL BE CLASS 52 DIP CONFORMING TOTHE REQUIREMENTS OF ANSYAWWA CL51/A21.51 AND C10NA21.4.FITTINGS SHALL BE CUSS 25000NFORMINGW TOTHE REQUIREMENTS -- CITYLIMITUNE � J OFANSI/AWWAC11NA21.100RANSI/AWNJAC1-1.53.HVORANiSSHALL8EPERCITY01ST.LOUIS Z PARK/GOLDEN VALLEY REQUIREMENTS.GATE VALVES SHALL BE SINGLE DISC TYPE WITH RESILIENT PROPOSED STORM SEWER w & SEAL MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF AMA 0509.ALL PLUGS,TEES,BENDS AND OTHER THRUST u POINTS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH CONCRETE THRUST BLOGNNG.ALLWATERMAIN SHALL BE ♦ ■ PROPOSED STORM SEWER MH/CB J Z "a INSTAI-EDWITH A MINIMUM OF TS COVER AND IN ACCORDANCEWTTHAWWACSXAND CONDUCTIVITY PROVISIONS CONFORMING TO ANSUAWWAC/11/A21.11.BEFORE BEING PLACED IN EXISTING STORM SEWER Q O W 'E SERVICE,THE COMPLETED WATERMAIN SHALL BE DISINFECTEDAND RUSHED IN ACCORDANCE a I] c WITHAWWAC651AND THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 13 EXISTING STORM SEWER MIMS J $S. SANITARY SEWER SHALL BE PVC SDR35 UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.SANITARY MANHOLESSHALL W BE""DIAMETER PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE IN ACOCRDANCE W 7HASTM one.CASTING �� PROPOSED SANITARYSEWER S SHALL BE NEENAH R-1642 WITH TYPE'&"COVER.MANHOLES SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM OFTWOAND MAXIMUMOF FOURADIUSTMENTRINGS. EXISTINGSANITARYSEWER Q .7. ALL PIPE CONNECT IDNS TOEXISTING UTILITY STRUCTURES SHALLBE"KOR-NSEA ORCITY w Z a- C) ` APPROVED EQUAL.FOR CONCRETE BLOCK OR BRICK STRUCTURES,CONSTRUCTAN OPENING -l0-.-10--10-w- PROPOSED 1(Y WATERMAIN -8 v EQUAL TO THE PIPE SIZE,GROUT AROUND PIPE TO CLOSE OPENING,MID REPAIR STRUCTURETO W �_ Q CITYREQUIREMENTS.THE CONTRACTOR SHALLVERIFYTHETYPEOFCONNECTIONWTTHCITY —Fw—a-M-- PROPOSED W WATERMAN U ENGINEERTNG DEPARTMENT AND COORDINATE ANY INSPECTIONS NEEDED FOR CITY ACCEPTANCE OR O .J BU PON ANY. MANHOLES,ANDI NG,SURFACING, GS)MURWORKISEDTOLTTYCA,STING ABOVEUIXNG VALVES, —s�R—a-r— PROPQSE03'WATERMAIN ALERT TO CONTRACTOR: o J MANHOLES,AND DRAINAGE CASTINGS)MUST BE RAISED TO ATGRADE OR ABOVECaRADE(!5 i APPROPRIATE)WITHIN 48 HOURS OF BEING COVERED.THIS INCLUDES ALL CASTINGS OLD OR NEW. —Nw—f-w— PROPOSED T WATERMAIN .9. CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING THE APPROPRIATE SEWER,WATER,AND 1. THE PRESENCE OF GROUNDWATER SHOULD BE ANTICIPATED ON THIS PROJECT.CONTRACTOR'S BID F- PWMBING PERMITS FROM THE CITYBUILDING DEPARTMENT SHALL INCLUDE CONSIDERATION FOR THIS ISSUE.WHEN PERFORMING GRADING OPERATIONS 5 —♦ E%ISTING WATERMAIN DURING PERIODS OF WET WEATHER,PROVIDE ADEQUATE DEWATERING,DRAINAGE AND GROUND OAS 5 10.UTILITY TRENCHES SHALL BE COMPACTED T095%STANDARD PROCTOR MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY • (ASTM D698.780R AASHTO T-99)FROM THE PIPE ZONE TO WfTHIN3FEETOFTHE GROUND SURFACE 4Ap q,16— EXISTING GAS MAIN WATERMANAGEMENT TO CONTROL MOISTURE OF SOILS.REFER TO MASTER SITESPECIFK/TONS. AND 100%STANDARD PROCTOR IN THE UPPER THREE FEET. ALL CONTRACTORS MUST CONTACT 03/20/2015 c�•11.CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CITY A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS PRIOR TO WORKING WITHIN THE __--_- EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER GOPHER STATE CALL ONE 2. ALL GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK BE COMPLETED(EARTHWOiK FINAL UTIl1TIE5,ANDFlNAL PROJECT NO. RIGHT-0F-WAV. GRADING)BYTHE MILESTONE DATE IN PROJECT DOCUMENTS.OUROT AREATO BE KEPT FREE OF 9 12.CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL,INSPECT,MAINTAIN AND REMOVE THE NECESSARY SIGNAGE FOR �7 EXISTING BUILDING MN TOLL FREE 1-800-252-1166 JOB TRAILERS AND STORAGE AFTER THE CONTRACT MILESTONE DATE FOR THECUROTGENERAL GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 180755001 LANE CLOSURES.ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES AND SIGNING SHALLCONFORM TO THE MMUTCD, CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE CLEAR ACCESS FOR OUTLOT CANTRACTOR TOTHE SPEOFlC PARCELAT IN CLU DING FIELD MANUAL FOR TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROLZONE UYOUTS,DECEMBER M. BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS ALL TIMES AFTER MILESTONE DATE.PURCHASER OFOUTLOTTOPROVIDEPERMITDCCUMENTSAND Q ZS SO 100 SHEET NUMBER E FUTURE UNDERGROUND STORAGE AREA TWIN CITY AREA 651-454-0002 SWPPP REQUIRED By STATE/LOCAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SPECIRCOUTLOT. ONE ELEVEN FOOT MINIMUM WITHROV LANE IN EACH DIRECTION NA DESIGN DETAIL ATALLTMES. $13.REFER TO UTICA AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PLANS FORADDITONALDESIGNDETAILFORUTLRIESIN 6060 UTICA AV ENUE. 14,CONTRACTOR IS TO LOCATE ALL MANHOLES OUTSIDE OF DRIVING NES. UTILITY NOTES LEGEND i - -' ---- U 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALLAT IFAST48HOUR5 PRIOR TO c EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION FOR EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATIONS.TIN PROPERTY LINE/ROW j CITIES METRO AREA:812454 01XV OR TOLL FREE:140029-1188 9 Z. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION,THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING UTILTTY CITY LIMB UNE LOCA TONS AND INVERTS,SHOWN OR NOT SHOWN.ANY DISCREPANCY BETWEEN PLANS AND FI ELD CON DITIONS SHALL BE R EPORTED TO THE PROJECT ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY. PROPOSED STORM SEWER VA-----+- D 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OFTHE BUIIiXNG PIPE _ - - NECTTO EXISTING SYSTEM PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION SERVICE CONNECTIONS. • ■ PROPOSED STORM SEWER MH/CB 1 P8IWRARY SEWER J..':-- �==.4. ALL STORM SEWER AND APPURTENANCES MUST BEFURNISHEDANDINSTALLEDIN 10ORA91A6E♦ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF ST.LOUIS PARK AND MOST RECENT REVISION OFTHE --�- EXISTING STORM SEWER 'CRY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA"(CEAM)STANDARDSPECIRCATIONS FOR �A1�fT WA76iMN UTILITY CONSTRUCTION. Q In EXISTING STORM SEWER MHOS t -+s "'��'�r' --'-"-'^'�'�'^"_-- ------+� �.-------•�•-{ --�-_- - ��-.-.-- Y S. WATERMAIN SHALL BE CLASS 52 DIP CONFORMING TOTHE REQUIREMENTS OFANSVAWWA r REQUIREMENTS C104/A21.4 I/AW ACIIWTTINGS 21.10 BEC ASS SIVAIN CONFORMING TO THE 1 PROPOSED SANITMYSEWER `^ ^^'.��- - I '" ,,,,�.. ...^-'-- ... .. .`-.. 4, ....:_r. __ J �; L , REQUIREMENTS OFANbI/AW WA C110A21.100R ANSI/AWJJA C157A21.51 "' -. � e BE PER CRY OF ST.LOUIS PARK/GOLDEN VALLEY REQUIREMENTS,GATE VALVES SHALL D� EXISTING SANITARY SEWER S BESINGLE DISCTYPEWITH RESILIENT SEAL MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OFAVAVA CSR]. _ ,_ ALL PLUGS,TEES,BENDS AND OTHER THRUST POINTS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH -1>Y-1e-E-10-- PROPOSED 10'WATERMAT S ITH AWWA 09IN - - - '- _ _ / M CONCRETE THRUST BLOCKING.ALL WATERMAIN SHALL BE INSTAUED WITH A MINIMUM OF 4 5 7.5'COVER AND IN ACCORDANCE W10 ANO CONDUCTIVITY PROVISIONS -h�-�Ir- PROPOSED S'WATERMAIN V CONFORMING TO ANSI/AWWA C111/A2111 BEFORE BEING PLACED IN SERVICE,THE - I I 1 S 1 K COMPLETED WATERMAIN SHALL BE DISINFECTEDANp FLUSHED IN ACCORDPNCEWITH -I-}Tr- PROPOSED 3"WATERFWN u L - I S ANANAC%1AND SMALLHE REQUIREMENTSOFUNLESS S NNESOTA OTEDOOERWISE. AITTOF HEALTH. I IW !'!7\f, unuTY EABEMB(T i I H1/i; 4 6. SANITARYSEWER SHALLBEPVC REINFORCED ONCRETHERWISESANITARYMANHOLES -xx-x-A` PROPOSED 2"WATERMAIN S70PWWATER ij7♦1� l tt�l■■ `xMj � SHALL BE 48'DIAMETER PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE IN ALCORpANCE WITH PSTN TiffA71BYi � 1 ° C478.CASTINGSHALLBE NEENAH R-1642WITHTYPE"B'COVER.MANHOIESSHALLHAVEA W EXISTING WATERMAIN EASEMENT � /tlllilt�yEli1► I I � I I �+ c MINIMUM OFTWO AND MAXIMUM OFFOURAdK1STMENTRINGS. }�Ft (� TLas 7. ALL PIPE CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING UTILITY STRUCTURES SHALL BETOR4NSE OR R,� I -+`"M +�� I V I I EXISTING GAS MAIN DRAINAGE a Ti CITY APPROVED EQUAL FOR CONCRETE BLOCK OR BRICK STRUCTURES,CONSTRUCT I �YEpgap4f I V II O k < OPENING EQUAL TO THE PIPE SIZE,GROUT AROUND PIPE TO CLOSE OPENING,AND REPAIR _ _ PRDf�O ��E17l-TY I EXISTING CURB ❑ ❑ THIS BMEET STRUCTURE TO ONWITH RECUR CITY DEARTMECTORSHALLVERIFYTHETYPE OF - - BTORTIECHUNDEFAIRDIL8Y ry �r �� +� c CONNECTION WITH CITE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTANDCOORdNATEANV INSPECTIONS .,.. ... EXISTING BUILDING IMENILE I I I V I Q I ^ g ° NEEDED FOR CITU ACCEPTANCE. /rn- (Sff UTILYLAYBAE I y, ��N■I/` n(]T,�[�##�■/F. I ! i] �I^ y1;ly i e. UPON ANE GRADING,SURFACING,OR OTHER WORKALLUTILf1YCP5TNGS(INCWDING NYPRW9YBdT PIANS) �• PROPOSED UNDERGROUND STORAGE VALVES,MANHOLES,AND DRAINAGE CASTINGS)MUSTBERAISEDTOATGRADEOR AREA �. gK ABOVEG "HOURS APPROPRIATE) HOURS OF BEING COVERED.THIS INCLUDES q V Ll _ zALL CASTINGS,ODOR NEW. 2 „ 9 CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING THE APPROPRIATESEWER,WATER, DRAINAGE 1 {I IN ® SANITARY SEWER STRUCTURE LABEL I ITTLRVFJLSF)B6T I I fi 1 AND PLUMBING PERMITS FROM THE ACTED TO 95 DEPARTMENT. ,y� ( {ry ■■ tt[ ru I S 10.UTIIRY TRENCHES SHALL BE COMPACTED T095%STANDARD PROCTOR MAXIMUM DRY ' Ei ■�iula,a�i}� }' ❑ ❑ I e` ISI II •t♦I DEN SITY(ASTM 0698.78 OR AASHTO T4191 FROM THE PIPEZONETOWTTHIN 3FEETOFTHE ■■ �{� Y GROUND SURFACE AND 100%STANDARD PROCTOR INTHE UPPERTHREE FEET I F� II Miilil (:' I 1b� yI'111{I 'I s 11 CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CITY A MINIMUM OF4BHOTRS PRIORTOWDRMNG PaovoeED I IAI 'TN 11 I CISTERN 12 CON ACTOR SHALWITHINTHE GL INSTALL,INSPECT,MAINTAIN ANO REMOVETHE NECESSARY SIGNAGE AMIE ■ I T >�,II/ I} ALL CONTRACTORS MUST CONTACT IwRUVIR NTMANB #Full FOR LANE CLOSURES.ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES ANDSIGNING SHALLCONFORMTO )THEMMUTCD,INCLUDINGFIELDMANUALFORTEMPORARYTRPFFICCOMROLZONE GOPHER STATE CALL ONE rk I �I GRAINac�EiLAVOUTS,DECEMBER 2001.ONE ELEVEN FOOT MINIMUM HATH UNE IN EACH DIRECTION i ` t ■ (� ��YEr SHALLBEPROVIDED ATALLTMES. MN TOLL FREE 1-800-252-1166 ! 1 ! ❑ ,r� 1 13,REFER TO UTICA AVENUEIMPROVEMENTPLANS FOR ADDITIONAL DESIGN DETAIL FOR BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS I I ❑ I s r g UTILITIES IN UTICAAVENUE TWIN CITY AREA 651-454-0002 I I 1 A - 16.CONTRACTOR IS TO LOCATE ALL MANHOLES OUTRIDE6DIiMNG LANES ;I I I I i 1 "vi l A✓ d UTILITY LEGEND S' O% S qO SANITARY SEWER LATERAL AT MINIMUM I. SLOPE.COORDINATE WITH O IT SPRINKLER ENTRY.DOUBLE DETECTOR BACKFLOW PREVENTER LOCATED E ARCH.PUNS. INSIDE THE BUIDLING.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REQUIREDTO INSTALLANY APPURTENANCES ON THE SPRINKLER LINE SUCH AS,BUT NOT UMTIEDTO, TSANITARY STIR OGAS ENTRY WITH GAS METER,CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR INSTALLING WITH ACHECK VALVE,POST INDICATOR VALVE,TAMPER SWATCH,GATE I I WNMB88.17 / yI� VALVES,ETC,MEETING LOCAL WATER DEPARTMENTSPEGFICATIONS.REF. PIPE SOLLARD PROTECTION AT METER,CONTRACTOR SHALLCOORDINATE ARCH PIANS FOR EXACT LOCATION FO SPRINKLER ENTRY AND BACKFLOW 'I I N WATER STAB WITH GAS COMPANY FOR TYING OF INDMDUAL METER. -. PREVENTER. n LOT RACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR TIOATON WITH GPS COMPANY R GAyf1v\ _ OC EGAROINGTHESIZEANDINSTALLATION OFOFGASSERVICELLNE.THEGAS O PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT AND ASSEMBLY,TYPICAL ASINDICATED,SEE ( I I-. FUTURE HOTEL-SEE SHEET 6060 COMPANYIS RESPONSIBLE FORTHE INSTAUATIONOFTHEGlSSERVICE DETAIL SHEET. e FROM THE DISTRIBUTION MAIN,UP TO AND INCLUDINGTHE GAS METER.THE OpG I I: ,' / II ! m 3 n K EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT. -/,G// ° CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL GAS SERVICE INSTALLATION AFTER O m t 4 THE METER. O REMOVE EXISTING STUB,CONNECTTOEXISTNGWATERMAIN. J --- �I I ! "�' - pi m m 'a OD INSTALL POST INDICATOR VALVE,1"PVC CONDUFFORTAMPERSWITCHAND ��- I'"I I / J /:< I V yP, TAMPER SWITCH PER LOCAL CODE. O 10'WATERMAIN VALVE. �I : I I K / s /� R U OO 7VALVE. �.rs O� o PROPOSED LOCATION OF TRANSFORMER PAD.CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY N i o U EXACT LOCATION AND SIZE WITH POWER COMPANY PRIOR TO INSTALATION I I if v: CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR INSTALLATION OF CONCRETE Op 10'WATERMAIN BEND. ---------- / •f/,^C // --- PAD.CONDUIT FROM PAD TO BUILDING,AND PIPE BOLLARDSAS REQUIRED BY y I / 'N X THE ELECTRIC COMPANY.CONTRACTOR SHALLCOORDINATE SAID WORK O 1ONT WATERMAIN TEE. I I• I .q I I WITH THE ELECTRIC COMPANY.FINAL LCCATON OFTRANSFORMER AND _ // Q I ( r O� / BOLLARD CANNOT CONFLICT WITH TRUCK ACCESS TO DOCK 0008. IT PUBLIC WATERMAIN.O I I I I . I I `I // l R 7PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER. �x OF TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE FROM POLE TO BUILDING TO BE EXTENDED BY O I L I I //. �[,. /t$ W TELEPHONE COMPANY. - S PRIVATE WATERMAIN. O CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ANDCOORDINATE WITHTHETEELEPHONE , OOO PRIVATE SANITARY SEWER FOR THE INSTALLATION OFIELEPHONESERVCE.TH ALCNDT, RATIONS iI I I I�I fI /CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR INSTALLING U %ILLWARES PESFROM PROPERTYTOLENTRANCE. O 10X6WATERMAINTE TELEPHONE COMPANY WILL PULL WIRES FOR TELEPHONE SERVICE. ALERT TO CONTRACTOR: 41 CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE THE TYING OFPROPC6EDTELEPHONE EPUBLICSANITARY 1. THEPRESENCE OF GROUNDWATER SHOULD BE ANTICIPATEOONTRISOBIO --------- AREAS SHALL BE H-20 HEAVY DUTY BOXES.CONTRACTOR SHALLBE SEWER SHALL INCLUDE CONSIDERATION FOR THIS ISSUE.WHEN PERFORMINGGRAOINGOPE / II / p RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING THE SIZE AND NUMBER OFCONDUITS DURING PERIODS OF WET WEATHER,PROVIDE ADEQUATE DEWATERING,DRAINAGE AND GROUND I I I I / /' ;' /c 41 REQUIRED. WATER MANAGEMENT TO CONTROL MOISTURE OF SOILS.REFER TO MASTER SITE SPECIFICATIONS. I I Z W O7DOMESTIC WATER LINE ENTRY.METER AND REDUCED PRESSURE 2. ALL GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED(EARTHWORK FINAL UTILITIES.AND FINAL /6 BACKFLOW PREVENTER LOCATED INSIDE THE BUILDING.CONTRACTOR SHALL GRADING)BY THE MILESTONE DATE IN PROJECT DOCUMENTS.OUTLOTAREATO BE KEPT FREE OF TAL a BERESPONSIBLEFORINSLINGANYAPPURTENANCESONTHEDOMESTK: JOSTRAILERS AND STORAGE AFTER THE CONTRACT MILESTONE DATE FORTHEOUTLOT GENERAL 41 / 5 LINE SUCH AS BACKFLOW PREVENTOR,GATE VALVES,ETC.WHICH MAYBE CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE CLEAR ACCESS FOR OUTLOTCONTRACTORTOTHESPECIMCPARCELAT I I / p REQUIRED.CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITHCTTY.CONTRACTOR SHALL ALLTIMES AFTER MILESTONE DATE.PURCHASER OF OUTLO'TTO PROVIDE PERMIT DOCUMENTS AND I I REF.ARCH PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS OF DOMESTIC WATER ENTRY, SWPPP REQUIRED BY STATE/LOCAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SPEGFlC OUTLOT. I I /q ° SLACKFLOW PREVENTER AND METER. I I / /. ` s GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET Z --- - ---- .-..---- - i� �/ /ea 0 20 40 80 CONNECT TO EXISTING r SANITARY SEWER - -� /�' / 411 } Lu S CgtB.TTDE70SfNG10'WATHUMM .., R S .".. L ----- I -------------------- / �y .' Q / _ .. ------ - - _- l / 3 --- -. - -- _ / /i I - -- ---- - - - SAS- Gt,° GFS G"' C"�--�''` -G4� AS-. /'!'5 Gh r i,�o' / Y 0 1- 139LFOFCPV000A0% / /�9JL/}rte j T Q o LJ.1 - L to - - � - _ y :...7I�C=_fir _r.+ ... .._.....�I�IIf->-• Q��: -:alt:_:.- ..'al:_._ - j - r Y �.'� . �"UIS7TY EJ18ENFM,- -- ---- ---- - - -------- - --�_ .�---- - - - _.// W 15LFOFWPVCQ1 -- - f•-i- - L •-- �'�.....�..A� 1 G' - F Q 1b LF6FS'PVC®DAD% I T -•• ... - .- Z d J M N M N LA 0 SANITARY CROSSING WATER- SANITARY STORM SANITARY SEWER STRUCTURE SCHEDULE SANRS, SERVICE H 01 TOP: 874.34 BOTTOM: 873.85 0 p H 11Fnh� I I ENTRANCE D QQ TOP: 874.64 - BOTTOM: 873.87 INVERT INVERT ENTRANCE STRUCTURE STRUCTURE RIM/GRATE IN4906.00 Q TOP: 865.95 BOTTOM: 873.92 ELEVATION ELEVATION PIPE OUT PIPE MATERIAL U) s I I 04 TOP: 865.88 BOTTOM: 874.62 NO. TYPE ELEVATION IN OUT (PUBUC/PRIVATE) DATE I 5 TOP: 873.73 BOTTOM: 874.70 SS 1 uH 8e,.72 E 88594 N 85584 PBUC PC 03/20/2015 Qe TOP: 874.37 BOTTOM: 874.72 S5_2 MH 880.96 $865.28 W 865.75 PLgy PM: PROJECT N0. -ASSUMED 7.5 FOOT DEPTH OF INSTALLATION FOR WATER SERVICE E 865.85 160755001 55-3 MH 878.97 E 854.23 W 684.13 PUBLIC PW SHEET NUMBER UTILITY ENTRY DETAIL °=20' 6061 - ��— ` • SEE CASTING BELNEEEENAH FOUNDRY NO.1733 OW -41 7/8• EXTERNAL SEAL I- HYDRAFINDER HYDRANT MARKER - RED&WHITE D®D�Q '910y„ ncA ADJUSTMENT RINGS— _�E%TERNAL�� _ QoQoQo 5'0"- 98FHMR - TO BE FURNISHED AND ` vwAelE IN.2,MA%.fi) o�0 0 o INSTALLED FOR EACH HYDRANT B e } INSTAL INET-SHIELD 0 0 25 3/4" 3)STACKING LUGS - °�eroaomc UNI-BAND(OR EQUAL). 2)C.I LIFT O 120•APART �4' TYPICAL A - 27•--, HANDLES HYDRANT TO BE CLOW MEDALLION SUPPLIED WITH O ADJUST TO ONE WIVE INCH (5")STORZ PUMPER NOZZLE i A ECCENTRIC CONE FINISHED GRADE AND TWO(2)HOSE NOZZLES. TRAFFIC FLANGE AT agog 1 3/16• NO MORE THEN SIX INCHES(6")ABOVE OR re r vc v w..w 0 24"MIN. I BELOW GROUND ALL JOINTS IN MANHOLE TO HAVE R� I1y 36"MAX.I FINISHED GRADE W RING RUBBER JOINTS. o$ o $ SEG A-A EXTERNAL SEAL tI11�go "HIGH LETTERS . 3 INSTALL INFI-SHIELD Oy,O Dy, 0 RAISED FLUSH WITH HYDRANT COATINGS DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION = SANITARY SEWER SERVICE CONNECTION TYPE "A" 4'-0" 5• GATOR WRAP(OR EQUAL). r u- SHALL BE REPAIRED AFTER THE BITUMINOUS BASE IS TOP SURFACE VALVE BOX I > INSTALLED. PRIME AND PAINT HYDRANTS PER AWWA G.V. ADAPTOR OR 24' TYPICAL I j AND MANUFACTURER'S STANDARDS. -a w APPROVED EQUAL m m g B B 6'GATE VALVE in N� PSX RUBBER . 1• 1/z• COVER WITH 2 LAYERS a ; GASKET—j DIRECTION OF FLOW•. pONITi SLEEVE TO COMPRESS 2" TEE n OF 4 MIL POLY. STA STEEL • MIN. 1 C.Y. CLEAR ROCK, 3/4"+ C 9 ivy arn�uL GASKET TO MANHOLE SIMFACE I L 8 TAKE-UP CLAMP GROUT SIDES 1 MACH.GROOVE IN 8 TO SPRINGIJNE UD SEAT FOR}' O k B oI" POLYISOPRENE S -< rux�outvl•xo NOTES: GASKET All A.USE NEENAH CASTING NO.R-1733 40 DUROMETER S •Sp1'0°K sTv"°'Om"m` 8" ." WITH A SELF SEALING UD WITH?va MEGA LUG � y§T z "1f0 a"p6gL CCEALED PICKHOLES.UD SHALL FI WIALL TTINGS 5'-4"------ REAOND: SANITARY SEWER.i 2• 18"X18"X5"CONCRETE THRUST BLOCKyo SECTION A-A B.MANHOLES TO BE MANUFACTURED 1• p! IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM C-478. d[ r INVERT PIPES WITHIN MANHOLE SHALL C.STEPS SHALL BE neEROLASS AND S SEC.A-A SEC B-B 8/2 PIPE iSET 0 SLIDES GROUT MANHOLE.TOPOF LOPEO SHALL COMPLY WITH MNDOT PLATE 1• WEEP HOLE TO REMAIN OPEN UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED TO PROVIDE DRAINAGE TO PIPE INVERT. D.INCREASE BASE THICKNESS TO 12" FOR MANHOLES 14'OR DEEPER. s DETAIL'X'6 E.GROUT BETWEEN AND INSIDE AND OUTSIDE OF ADJUSTING RINGS. $T.LQDis Pafk PUBLISH PLATE ff.'LESOiA PLATEN UD WITH UFT HANDLES DATE NO. �$t.Louis Park PDATE PLATE A A ENGINEERING R-1733 1 23 2o1a s-a MRWESOiA CLOW MEDALLION HYDRANT WITH DATE No. SJ „ pepµpl mix rncw<n / / ENGINEERING STORZ PUMPER NOZZLE i/2J/2014 W-2 err € a Fa�" 1.'» m c � aos ww1rR 1R.w.a. i SECTION a-B E PUBLISH PIAiE g St.Louis Park ogre Louis Park PUBUSH PLATE M®Mlsvcsora SANITARY SEWER CONNECTIONS /d MINNESOTA SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE DATE No. 6 g W ` ENGNEERING TYPE A&B 1/23/201♦ S-1 1/23/2014 $-2 ENGINEERING b W $ •N3 V pp� yGo 3 s 3 3 Z FINISHED SURFACE BACKFILL J U) I T_I1 1 1 1 1 1 12" OR 1/4 Bc a J (WHICHEVER IS GREATER PROP- PROP. ` ) UNE ADJUST STACKS TO CONFORM WITH FINISHED UNE r GRADE USE FORD A-1 METER BOX COVER FOR 4-45' BENDS WITH MEGALUG (TYPICAL) _ PLACEMENT IN DRIVES&WALKS. _ W e 12" OR 1/4 Bc 12" MIN. J Q INSULATION AS REQUIRED (WHICHEVER IS -� _ GREATER) I I CURB BOX MIN. CURB BOX MIN. MINIMUM LENGTH = SEWER O.D. + 24" _ = COMPACTED GRANULAR ENCASE- NT r 1 1/2I.D. 11/z I.D. 3 —I� E / T6 CENTERED ON SEWER BACKFILL COPPER WATER SERVICES MIN. WATER TO HAV£(S)BENDS TO . .. . ...... / ....... ....................... ...... / ALLOW FOR SETTLEMENT. - % 12" MIN. I MAIN ( = COMPACTED GRANULAR BEDDING Q1 O z 6" MIN. j� COMPACTED GRANULAR I 1/4" Bc MIN. CONCRETE BLOCK WATER MAIN OCK J // / ENCASEMENT(D 6" MIN % SSEIWERY j -1I-Ii—TTI—III — CONCRETEeiaac (n COMPACTED GRANULAR UNDISTURBED GROUND LU / BEDDING -MINIMUM RESIDENTIAL SEVICE SIZE IS 1' > Z Q SEWER X/ 10 GRANULAR BEDDING AND ENCASEMENT SHALL CONFORM TO THE GRADATION Y W H i 4 Bc MIN. REQUIREMENTS IDENTIFIED IN THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. ALL Z 1/4 ENCASEMENT AND BEDDING SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO THE PIPE -FOR 1 1/2•&2'SERVICES PIPES SHALL HAVE A 45'DEGREE BEND CONNECTEDQ LU SLEEVE WITH 6" MIN � /\��\��\��\��\��\� COST. To THE CORP STOP TO FACILITATE THE DOWNWARD EXPANSION LOOP. CL P MEGALUG (TVP.) CLASS B PIPE BEDDING Q W i 6" MIN. UNDISTURBED GROUND o FOR WATERMAIN •2'SERV CE PIPES SHALL HAVE A 2'CURB BOX z a U s Q GRANULAR BEDDING AND ENCASEMENT SHALL CONFORM TO DJ U -� THE GRADATION REQUIREMENTS IDENTIFIED IN THE PROJECT U MINIMUM LENGTH = SEWER O.D. + SPECIFICATIONS. ALL BEDDING AND ENCASEMENT SHALL BE e 48" CENTERED ON SEWER. CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO THE COST OF THE PIPE. SOLID CONCRETE UNITS IN € FULL BED OF MORTAR 3 1.MMAINTAIN 6" MINIMUM CLEARANCE BETWEEN SEWER & INSULATION PIPE BEDDING (CLASS B) R.C.P. 2. TE 2. MAINTAIN MINIMUM 6" SELECT GRANULAR MATERIAL AROUND INSULATION. NO MORTAR 03/20/2015 5 SANITARY SEWER ON JOINT PROJECT NO. SURFACE 160755001 TYPICAL WATERMAIN OFFSETS mSt.LOUIS Park PUDAUSH PLATE SHEET NUMBER TYPICAL BULKHEAD MINNESOTA WATER SERVICE CONNECTIONS € ENGINEERING 1/23/2014 W-1 6062 Ln NUD—INNO 'ON—NW :31Va rvGM A8 83A03HJ W s�ry IVIIN341S32J Ola o $o O v1os31MW eo A8 NMV80 Nd�d NW'A311VA N3Gl0J/>QJVd sinm '1S a(w`� 00 Z /`/�yva.�� azvis 3Hl 3o sMn 3NL emNn a33NON3 "Noss—Mrv8 0\O O w O UJOH<t\• alwr 03tl10 AWNtl30Nn tl0 3W A9 03NVd3tld SVM 1 Od3tl A6 03N 1530 J N IlH J I ��`d2��/�O 1S3M>I2Jtld lb b1N3 o a c tl0 NDLLVDUI-DUI 'NVId SIM 1VHl—83J A8383H I 3,VJ5 O .....,_ QZ WNO Z Z O W v7 co J J �J NORTH v Nei z WAYZATA BOULEVARD w W A:-> OLwj to w p �� \ <�ww' a} QQ �\,,, o=ooz 0- -J J M Q Z �,LLJ off$ p Z R \ ��; \\ Z ° P19V w $�w 1 3! Q u� Z � ��A A.A\ \� �\ w g- "Slogcc @ F w v \ w W < w a1.°: r rce \ \�� \ \\ I 4,=< ow�o�a \\ \ \ N \ \ I 0=tea o� �a y 0lo LLJr ol zu W. SI 0 �� +� :L. Zas' :`II'•• .'.>al y• I3{ eta 1\ .Z............ l.J { I U' rq L�1�:111 }ltfWJ�I NujP LLJ I a:'. a c�o Lu > :C.•� u r a i Foga c Q l7 At• H ' �� \ pz ao� 7=7 77 O x F- w �WU- { v1 Of Z "On 1 W W 4u a.�w _ 4yt.. b 4.ayu 4' 7 4\+.a..4f' ,'>•} '.' }4IYJy.4C.` t'Ifi o' I! I yyry C pY4`�J, — r}bf. y✓h+..Q O N 11'Qy Y�d+{�/,[?LyyMa(�s+ty4eaY .�.+1ay11.4 4 b. f 4.l)�hVk Y O > cW4 4�6 ]qty e+TA'*t,l' L 4 b t yl.y4a4U p 2 v 6' �aL y �b4aN '�.'aai'r tr4fb 4M i '.atm 4y v a.4V u m LL I LJJ C.) spp C J i LL LL- 0° f w i tl 0 Y SII � �� •I �P � J / a LL LL r; I ° N d _� } ' W I O a O U 1 y e I I M I( tl I V \`` I + I I( s1II ! I 1 � �iirrrrrYir�ria'�.'rrsrriira� � � Z JW n Lu w d III I I _ I { I -aul'nlelwan.v uoH�ralu,IM v1"NY 1mvxW v4 IWM'aul•cvlvpwvV puv...N_tvIWN F4 uvHvftlopv Puv 4ox.:wwnP vaxuW bWvxW 3w4,oaop a ualP P aatic a41+af FWo pvPugy c aaWav!o luawry}cul u v'4vivy paluwud vu6lvap puv cltlaauoa aw wiv+v43a6o1'1 aop c Iw IP I P l acrwx pa,oda,d cox.11 Va14.,ol 1 uv vcoNntl aUl I o v uawn Iw Q m 0 ❑ w w I (D 2 — Y WOM n u�ia pro lLOwc„•Y•F 'ON'�Il HW 131V0 A9 03AO3H� axpw IVLLN3aIS318 0-10 o Z o r WPc�>ud.l ;r u° .�pPp� S,W �Z'8L �Sb'Hd) A9 N«VNN NW'A31WA N3a]OE)5i8Vd SMOI 1S oo L)Ln ' O 'V1�53NNIW!0 uaoH((( a�wr��V1 3NW�n 3oNn uo 3WWAB1 aiVidN3ud SM51 Od3N MrveA6 43N91S30 NV/ d J N I lH J I� foo W ND NOLLV�Lip3d5'NVId SIW 1VHL A ULL AH—H I 1S3M A8vd WHIN30 M a cD x 31VDS OUVA3inoa vivzAvm �M w , N U a re LL m I I a ► \ Q ''. rn Wcr I� W Q a \ f i � a � ti ry LH J 1 ! \ r p r ILL I FI W ............ .. .. i y �W V ...1-.1.... }''''�E• sl � !J'E i •:' y d � ij sf 'II u, I rn ! W T .✓' a-_ 4 OD " 1 .• `� z gg�aoo-2 1' I O O u z LL co _ z W �o 50 wa a� ' o o � Si cai�f .Jv�imd LL �No ?vooa I _�OD 0 o Y VA n 5 i I w U Oa v�iw €tea�' s `O w~0 -F-wz� q 8 �Wo a(n iroa C ��a 8o lo! iW: Uw U x UCL o lo A z wy� 0 rc-on Ipy o X m 81- .bD �a8-o • o 0NfaO pz3=udrc .I x � -0- HU HUH Z'oo r owN->w� qq $ Ouoow � asm O.QOQ UF6oW� Q'm'o3 ac��avi th 555 Iwy Z e fR Www � R CN 8 LL Z W n U C x C g E lip 3 a` a Iola ai A1199W1 L�41W.V IPY'pul 1.l.PweV P oH—lalwlN F uoNwtloPe p ual3ozVaullno ua131+w 1 .etlo.Gwl p a.otla+E a 4a14w+oP Puo a tl+nE a .a!Aluo P e is ivawMeul u 4—Ideublc.p Puo el0eauoa eyl yilw n41a6o1'lucwm p clyy Qoe m C) Q P w IP ti Q (D _ - Y em wou-`aaNY'MMM AGM in ¢ ;ypµJ 'ON'On NN :31V0 AB 03NO3HO IVIIN3GIS3H Ola O W Ncci n.x•iuxl 3+Y usbHYan Duce SIM p N uaoH �a�w YA053NNINJO AN"��"� S�Ibl�4 JNIlHJI� Nw'�3lldn N3alo�nladd slnol 'is W _ co 3IY15 3N1!0 SMYI 3Nl lnONn b33NI0N3 1YN065330bd IHWB Ory r H O 103bn AN tl0 3n AB 103YId3tld 5 NS 1bOd311 A9 03NOIS30 O 0 W NO NOLLYOl1l—'NYId SIHl 1VW 1-30 A.-1 1S3M>1 H Vd 1b211N 30 oa`ON 31VJ5 ru v� U �ILL ul =5 rl Y1�s b a' S�Sfififim a N i J 0 to b r 5 I 33 c I � � h-- r^ I I 00 1300 0 00000000 000000 000gpo rhe rnoaaav rulwena pp •� g �' :3dAl n y 0 � 6Q5 J U3 e 00 J u J Q Q 0: € YL> L •i LO C O y O N O _ a U e o :ugslnPN � b31NYJ 5lN)HN'NI'1 Iu'ra.l-si Z >� 5 O C0 0 a m Z w Oh F w a " w� w N u y5ytltd$ ggg6 RSA <8 & 18 j w � 2�: d b 0 \ETC-- * 1PPovY P Pavy P JP¢VPVIno ua14,a ICP aP yVJ uP wolP,,¢ dwl P crvb y b cPM it caQ Jm�411N PH-A a M roi luyP P abl»d¢¢VJ,oJ A Papuvlul Y'a as!P luaw ulv,¢V pivnvad au6lvP Puo sid¢auaP a41 4JIb wVi¢6P1'ivwnaoP 5V1 U uJ Pd¢U- wGm Nt1�d nm woo_ S8L9/ 777 SPI Iw SI-OZ-fD >iw AB 03NO3H0 p OQ m np�yq: �.>u"nd;.nepa 3HArd'o Svom Sew It/I1N341S3?J ala zvv O A9 NMtlND AdVOSONVI Nn 'AzMVn N3GIOEV i ]Vd sino- is oo w� o uaoH�<c�(a�ua�atru au 3o w m m. ,Mwa N W =�Am v nv I ivw oN NDwoaa A8 0317530 1S3M>I2�b d�b 2j1N3 o a N CO L7 NO DI IMA 1D 71 AG K IV OAA M L I _ bbl n o E V w W louvDl�a'wv ou irw F.atm♦�1 31x05 F,0 UZ ANN ekza �w � W 1-O Z 0J-m4 g�h W HQ NZa NV ISI G �w NORTH vii"' yFw„°jC.)e M� yg �g aNUfn mo< oWE _ < rzuj Wa �3 � •,.,:.. au ...` \\\ U=FO an i- g o w m Z' Ww pia 3ww2�w .. : q >w e '? ♦� \�/ \�\ LC osis miQHIR °we ! �wmo a� 1, 6, zo°3� �mo�Qa pi im.0<< MM HU LU a. t `'x ��❑ $ 0 LL¢F q`A �l s m EL MILD e l F j p ^to LU o 1 a 7 T r (��` Q cp7 µsI Zp •{. 1 'f. �•c � � {i��,. �{�� ' LU $ wed j w O w ( IL QQJ`� Oammmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm 1 g a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ,i w m m m m m m m o Qa, I rLd LAJ { (� r �►ilG �I X36 zz o � o $ J� § z w m .. ...... ... .. C C' coo < z m $ � 1 v- 2 a� LU w OIFi5fRj LL 1 M f i i LL a5 I I J _ N O oi5 w fA; m o 0 o i- rjs F-2 0'� o 0 IL o i (� $ � �F ' �w . M o / o> ._ w -.'-'o o Zg� wNw oLL ; 5s y= { Cl f ' o gmoF o oN woa o: o <m �sw i If F g rc°mwi o u F°. o'o_ i 11 . 3iw r°rc ' _� a dmy rc c� oa H<< o C) F oda ' f =a oaw; sw a RE F2 3a LL>m - N > �v°i3m $ as Nw m '��`< $a $g F. w,YnS aul'vvioPovsy Puu u+eH�.wIwIN ei FiINVelI iroellw v9 Ilew'ael 1wlpNontl poo weH-AaIwIN Fe......ppp pw wHeal+e4lro wHpw iroyipc lwwnapp elVi uo noel P++ado+dwl pu tla,d co 11 VaIVw cq lugP Pup vPodM aYlab wVl+W Flue pvpw44 al bP.+Pc p 3wwMVW w o'Wwn4 Wlwvwatl valwp Puo vidvauoa wyi Yllw+aVlaOol lwwnaep qyi Hdl (Z'R� 3SVHd) cc l3 OO6fZ 'SII NW S�-0ZTp 3tV0 AB 03W73 H'1 O ^O m p'��`•,pYd r13NmvH•a°roi lt/IlN3aIS32i 01(lry z o xYCi]WY CLSiA TV us Tlxn pcc2 'VA053NNIWA Wag AG wnvaa NVd NW 'A311VA N3a100/NNddsinoi '1S ao w'� � y^..� 3LV15 31LL A Sc1Vl 3Nl Y3aNf1 N33NYJN3 IYNOLS53dONd Wry ^ H �— VaUN�� V � Q35N3JIl A M Y WV 11VW pNd ND SN d 5 N,rAB 03NJI530 w O w (o W� 1�3tl10 AW 1.45 tl0 3Y1la 03Wd3tld M w H I �d bO S4 N b� 1S3M 112it/d ltRilN30 O 4. �1! tl0 N�LLV]I1113d5•NVId SINL 1VH1 AdLLtl3�A83113N I 31V�5 0 r C° w W UZ-N V Z �O�zo W z J c3 0 r I J,i m a MORTI.I I I - fWWoln as ~ I I ~wzw. oo U EEO o=boa Aa. Qoz u � ud °¢ui t5 oz x�ai oW� �rc ill l f� � Z � I !: � /t �.w•.• e Zoo_w� °h=�� f ti6oloN {, 1•. WUwle ° Qorc QI 1 1 7"^ .I D�oS6 °L=y Z ¢ I 1' I �� \�\ ~waw i�<�w' uj W m'oou Ph Z I y� ,�6 I� 1 A` • :1, t•' W Z I iz � R 3oa ail f N N � I r 1F d �p 0E- I o�LU r 1.' N Z I io y I I. t r � ' lvl W -♦ .. .. ... P aC.l r L-- 1I............'..... .. } rur. Z f mY < ,r.-'res •fir I I I t pY' �. I l w QQ Z t.. ,•F...+r...`4W.... ::H Yia1r •H ,'N II t.I................ W I 1 ..olu N I jll LL rl t �1{ I 0 H I I fj I —1 w I \•! 1. I� �I In II I I I I I m W =O z < W Z �] a I� % R a Q w 0 N m LLP W O� W m z �� O aaQ JNJ W y Z }} kh kh kh kh kh kh kh kh w i o a ai W m �0�- .mp ! mb b amtl aamp ampwow b c3� Wm m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m O a O O m Zw z 4 (9 � aF� R� � � LU M tG p Z Z w� W W �{� Rz h Z, Z o 'd �< < W wo a Ox I O Zwz a �a $ 3 Wa Z > U N x LL y�[ O m w fJ Za O WE 0.O O 4 O G S m w a z > o z ^LL Z O O g�yZ�, o z g3 !3Jy o o z 8 O R W J = U g Z r W 3 m N a g m o �o rc� ry � o a k' o w c� � Wc� ��; i � � wa � oi �_ � ml I 1 0(IN � � 4y B o� z om m a _ = Q c7 �' F w f m w a 'L m z < " w o O TJiviz lio W LU IoW w .1'o ° z o �m W�h �N o w'rc wrc �o o' mz`BZ Z�N 0Q �o Wa o oFO ' W -0 2 Np p O0OWZn uq O2wow zG d ¢ li r —H-A-A a3 F3111V.11 O uo ual4ozUoylno u ro411+`lucwnuap cl auol P+uadautlwl puu 3o a crotl'p tlwd cox.)I 4�IVc�o ac 3p iucwMcul up o cidcauea ay3 4i 43c6p]'1 napp cl 111 3 43 aio 1 lualP pup aaodznE uUlaatic aV1 ip!4luo PaPua3ul cl aaN, o ula,ay pal uacaud cu6lcaP pu a y ..mi.�c�a-A3wixo SBLBt 'oN'an Nn 9l-OS-CO uro Hd Ae 03>03HO V I VIA /Ia w Yor�3 s`•`` 3rucr«na.Yz 3NAyd'0sy3m v 1t111N3aIS32�Ol4 N zo CV r1�3M.N,o wae�B wrNo NW 'ADTI A N34lO!D5QJVd Sino-I 1S ao w tl Z UJOH ((Aalw�Lrl l]tlIOE NyN30N NO 3N BI 03Wd3tld SNVMSAWd3N N,rA6 03W 530 A d bO Sa NV' O\ W 80 N-VOlf—'NVId SINK 1VNl—30 AB3tl3N 1S3M 112Jb'd 1t211N�0 o 31VOS 0 o w U Um - � Z j w 0O UU cN d aF a> FJ m ,ZT U rc • Raj 0O o Ixil .1 w w - <pp o O 6 U U Z \ E U U a 3 Ir d 0 Q"F � W Z M Q WN a o IEiI� _ wa z z �<V r �7 �U Q EJ _III.. Z¢D O w of ❑ O. om Z a � Z O Ur � - F< S ❑2 ❑ o N a om I� Eg ❑ rc� N F- ez �7 mF tt¢ pa LLo W • Uu E J 0 i1�JN zo .. Zz m �< z Z I W 8 � p 10 � F� as cn 3 OEC Q tf• �i0 4 oz ¢� F�< LU �Zm N Z O U U UJ<J ❑ K <N z J D p • 1 I I�(i � � a � �� <� �J � '------' � i o v Z � m a H 'N w� a� ag d � O�j1 � a. � U ¢ O ZD 0 E N •I O < m z N rr t9� Q� -0 m N maw z1e a o 3N rco a-i'J`m ZZoo i = m Gobi " Q rc 1blp❑i ow 7d S �o PS FTFm 6w N j ¢ O WOJ p 1 ❑ U U �� a O . J47 io mw jr o 0 aha G z ❑ ZtdyJ N 1-. ma itis rc v9 z awe m �P ¢ A z zX < 20�w rc t%JU mr`� ❑E §- < m m� 2 O w ❑ E<rc �wi x m arc❑ i ao a+ 8-s r w " m 0 19''a vJimOz w o0 n so h miow vl EO a z o o w8vsi o I 2m ❑'d'OSw 2 x�w S� ZOWZ < (O�FuuffN W F� ❑ w N.� ZQ V1 mLL 2 W m hU1V Zm < rcOrc F Vf UI Uj F- ❑3� F U F" 00 <E < m F0< ?aw J " m hs ¢ w U �W lJ<WJJw� V m UDE aUUW w Z Q� O U U 2 w R ��m ¢ JJwWx d an d J�J m 0 III I_i VZ W Q K �i Iq� <<F❑ < In ~Z � > ja Z? O Q~ W~ ❑ J q❑E O d I-II LU Z Ua VO ON V F Z ZU WE K� �V�1 x F- Frye < H ~ 2 p x X �W W m U Z VI O i < /a-f51❑ M ziZ girc a v wm .S nwa H az z w �^ °'❑w $ 00 0 O VI] � 7 0 0 E 0 1� ¢ x r?:'!.: I I n O m m❑ 4oZ z i zz mz ❑ rcu J zo f < �❑ wiom ma wz� Z < m _ Z n ♦ n m 'o 10 + + _ _ �� w �� a III: .I.I II "III II II z o;❑ + III_ zQH N ri w vi n ai fn + + + n 'ry.I� n J .. H ly oI p tLU t t i� jO� 'r; .i: Z J O ?�2• I I. (Q� + Q m t�Y}%}Y,3- III 11 zB. a i I" p _ z 4.v;.SJ. 0.o .4./,'.., + = o w is+>,,, \ I I III I I w Z I—I W Ft., C7 ioFa I _ III 4 tiz,�",ll\ .Y.. sill z ❑�a � m �LLa a IIIIII ... I III—III IILD a� II = oda E!, III I w II II I II I II I II IIIII I I I I w U 10 EE rc� o —I I w p .0.6 rcaII' .9£ .B4T co 1- wff� rcYl ❑ 'dAl „4 m o zu oa ms u nW 000, ❑ F w ao x Lo rc ZO ay�1 UF p 0 H Q J Y T �J 0pp w 1088 o 10 Bma�dw < z 0. In � z Q Q 0 o vc�z 00� Rr'�I < * }z ON j ow w�z iz_n''-$� E a,cyG�i OZ¢o $ st 0 o OO1�lwId gUF}� FS j3w Q ❑0 4 B� O>ia ,jF-�`�" SON (� .0w EO�$o k' cA z O U m� a❑ ¢N00 vii Jcxi~�< 30 30 Jrn �I 14< ri0Zg :.m 06 OR a z � � z f ~O< e of N o w D w co <o w j m 8o y « .J F. UO m ,E Q v� z wo w 4' NM ,C �� m< O V J �� SdIYm CD 2-1 � L i < ❑ w W w w o0o ww LU SO a- rc N w m Q J o u0 ZiaO F, 0 M- 0 MW mow �xF �� 30 �z� 0 Z oOnd �� Ow b < 2YE Z �m < 6w zi,N6 E,60ao'Off. � a � �ZXb ~m� mam ma z`�F� z m ❑?-z maw ways a $ ��w >om oo .., I p NUI F.im o H Q �W 02S o demas �$z �<i m N o �aN c'�ar Inca o ziOO m Cn dS Nm �U.j , ❑F �r� agaaw~w0�❑- �d uoi Fo Zzz �ig� Q �� Z O.Zo m Z �F w a oa Eo�p�' m,��a�zl''<� m R" k'N oln aoorcd �o ws` o S" LLIa J z UW $m U7 - "U2w<U .2 jw� vaZz z0 Oi) WWamm Z a Q aw ilswQ a�b1�Ea� mo\z E so�5 3o Ew.xa v�poQ w<� �� w �a<o� a (� �2 c1Q rl Vlm�iV a�S Sx�3� �m Nm SLS 1�2 OCFm mQNZ �M- ZI c��5 3r, Y m �.I'•golou•¢y o vaN,wlwla.r Aann.11 i.oun..a n. .,,,I'.goPo..v v maNJl.IwIY Aq..mldoc=v.... ..ul..I,n m.aw n.o 1... •,om.a.. h•a•. .oM,.•to .wM..l.. ..rv...,a..cl•,v o ..n� ��ov.Im I n I :n nl rv.w�=w.Ivi.o.o..lp,.• ,aa o .m ww.,ol I..la v.•••omm�� Q m U w U- _ Hdl NV I d WW'-CIO w x Won 'ON'Jn NW Sl-OLID 31V0 A8 D3No31-13p W �u.s NN'mma'Is N3NMVH'.I OODL IVIlNDGlS3H Ola N =o CO CD 3\r Al6YNND ppC[ 'tl1DS3NNIW dO waa AB NMVHO NOlJ-VA2J3SERId NW'.l3llVA N3MO9/)wVd Slnol •1S ao w SNYI 3Hn tlWDruJOH(((Aalwr}l. msJl YI/ i 1LL N --d-s' NlfA9 03NDS30 o 0 w_ 1J3tlp AN tl3DNn tl0 3W AB 03Wd3tld SVM 1tlOd3tl 1S3M NI ]Vd 1VHiN3o tl0 NDLLVJIlIJ3d5'NVId SIM IVM—XI—113N 1 31VD5 d�dO SD Nb'I o O O - W I i 1 8W MH o b 12 M +f Z \ W ito o'p �Q�o mvr ao QNo o af of Qac j(� loo ! VWowo a �W WvIFi aoa� °aawaoo �3° o°aooa woa Z'oo38 'oo i L) Oo°oa woaso I �zao�u, ( x�' -.-- �\\.`1\ fi u2�oz 0=oo, 'a�'mwoa'o O �p 'I F! ET=FILE I .�� `^ S < W o,o a °e°o VA 1 � t� it .I JILL! U,- 1 1 1� �I - .I z,La sI 1 = r I F J i 1 ! i I / Q g 7 4 0 �zao ZO I ' � 8 ® I O W Nw C5 om 1 o .0 ( 1 I ; ti' �, �YVw j o LL o f 'I Q a �g N 6 W O I z U ai = x W I •— �� g ` x " r' x w € w"r�•`:.,:..."..�T,ter"y�.f}.,i.: ! +�— L,. F �! u ( y y U1 Eil r 6 r o -- - ._ t i �►It m z a o w a I o w v co , i V ' a oZz ' v a wz.ww pZNF~ W 3 I I L. m i ( �;( jr �F�rzz cc wy wx LO 6 wo IWp��yy S� 1{ I pf J w -, z <a.NZ a A, W r i 4 a �'-'�t / 1 Z F 0 w O y� ,I ��ii OMQ Z a Z IFI i pl� "7 o Z k w z a i I i Y rIA 11 C a V' F v ( 1r Il Z�m a 15 V)0 r =Nno.a l 1 Z it r l z�w5 a � r I ' I , t A 1 � •1 i, I 11 �_LLLl__I - rr i'J o -:77 o W W 0 fnW Z �� \ — — �� om IrY 0 0 - -J -A »I �m <mwz �z z W Q < ....c aa. s w a W Q W �W�,� «... {�.. ..! 1 I + o0 oFo ozo oio k wf�-' Oz wiz fn_—W l h� t f Z } o> o> w p a w a LL 5 �� I t W a �z� z � - �V)IZI? o O� !2 { r, (,{ �ti .'i}'f'r':•:�" •-rrrr.i.>r� n W �a�' 'oo�I �¢w o�w a (r 11 0 O O LL, I i } i'_• I J m ow W- out WU �z wOw OOW wa 0 of w { W Cq i i .� I_i 0 ooh u o�w U�3w w< W Z i i ---- Z LU ' wo g J 0 H Wr, Nz i' µ Iuipa I zl aul'w{papwr P ucH�lgWN p3 A,BVgI{roV{IM aV I,p aul•..{pawn Pup wpN�tquryg RV--l"puo uplipxPpVlro"I"{ro4{M{wwropp qV{up ,v—dm pup Iv a rotl 9—,d 11 Valva,G 1.—P vpWnd aUavdv•1,pl aap pvPuviul v vv Ip 1--u p'Wvn4 Pviuwud v Iwp Pup v{daaum ayI,DI.w4ia6p {•luvu+ropp clVl Q [0 U � W p lip (� �2 — Y 1 2 13 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 111 12 1 13 1 14 1 15 1 16 CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK A s TREE INVENTORY TAG# TREE DBH/HEIGHT(FT) SPECIES NOTES SIGNIFICANT? SAVE/REMOVE E 1 12 DBH CRAB APPLE YES S 2 10 DBH CRAB APPLE YES S B i3 12 DBH CRAB APPLE YES S 4 10 DBH CRAB APPLE YES S i 5 10 DBH CRAB APPLE POOR HEALTH NO R = 6 10 DBH CRAB APPLE YES S f" R O 7 10 DBH CRAB APPLE YES S = xs� i C a 8 10 DBH CRAB APPLE POOR HEALTH NO R ^ x 111 18 DBH NORWAY MAPLE YES S r� 125 26 DBH GREEN ASH YES S MULTISTEM-POOR 130 14 DBH APPLE TREE HEALTH NO R ` 132 21 DBH CHOKE CHERRY POOR HEALTH NO R € 8 R <aeo N p 3 133 19 DBH HONEY LOCUST DEAD NO R 134 21 DBH GREEN ASH YES S 5 aw<g a 135 31 DBH BLACK LOCUST POOR HEALTH NO R €meq o s 144 12' SPRUCE 4.98 Cal.Inches NO S a 146 7 DBH WHITE OAK YES S FNg , a 159 7 DBH BLACK ASH YES S HH! E 165 7 DBH BLACK ASH YES S J a 166 8 DBH BLACK ASH YES S m m a E 175 11 DBH GREEN A5H YES S w U a a z F w 0 KEY TREE REPLACEMENT SUMMARY Q Q z DBH = DIAMETER BREAST HEIGHT(MEASURED ((A/B)-0.20) x C x A = D ( , \ Z FOR EVERY DECIDUOUS TREE AT A v / �( HEIGHT OF 4.5' FROM THE GROUND LEVEL) 0 ^` A TOTAL DIAMETER INCHES OF SIGNIFICANT TREES LOST ASA •• LL 5 = TREE TO BE SAVED RESULT OF LAND ALTERATION OR REMOVAL e Z G R = TREE TO BE REMOVED B TOTAL DIAMETER INCHES OF SIGNIFICANT TREES SITUATED tv; ON THE LAND ... SIGNIFICANT TREES C TREE REPLACEMENT CONSTANT(1.5) J ANY DECIDUOUS TREE THAT IS AT LEAST FIVE CALIPER INCHES AND ANY CONIFEROUS TREE THAT D REPLACEMENT TREES (NUMBER OF CALIPER INCHES) Z IS AT LEAST SIX CALIPER INCHES IS CONSIDERED SIGNIFICANT } f NOTE: ASPEN, COTTONWOOD, AND SILVER MAPLE TOTAL SIGNIFICANT CALIPER INCHES REMOVED: 318.81" J H ARE ONLY CONSIDERED SIGNIFICANT IF THEY J ARE AT LEAST 12 DBH TOTAL CALIPER INCHES REQUIRED TO BE REPLACED: in Q NOTE: SALIX, BOXELDER, SIBERIAN ELM, AND BLACK ((175'/285")-0.20) x 1.5 x 175" = 109" Lu LOCUST > J LOCUST ARE NEVER SIGNIFICANT > W Q PROPOSED TREES (PHASES 1-4) o Z 1' EVERGREEN HEIGHT= 0.415 CALIPER INCHES d O C) 51 3" CALIPER DECIDUOUS TREES = 153" J C 8 of of of I 78 2" CALIPER ORNAMENTAL TREES = 156" Z d U W J 'g 29 6 FOOT CONIFEROUS TREES = 72" U O J sTOTAL PROPOSED TREES(CALIPER INCHES): 381" U) DATE 03/20/2015 PROJECT NO. K 160755001 E SHEET NUMBER pE 6104 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 19 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY A - E TREE PRESERVATION MITIGATION FORM(3-STEPS) STEP#1 EXISTING SIGNIFICANT OR SPECIMEN TREES STEP#3 REPLACEMENT REQUIREMENT (See Ordinance for Further Explanation) B ON ENTIRE PROPERTY Survey,locate and number trees on plan Largest Category Category Category Sig.Trees "A"Trees "B"Trees "C"Trees i TREE TREE TREE Conifers 12'to 24'high 0 xi 0 x2 0 x4 0 O NUMBER SPECIES SIZE(in.) Conifers 24'or higher p x2 0 x4 0 x8 0 = _ C #1 Crabapple 12 Hardwoods 6"-20"diameter #183 x1 0 x3 0 xq 0 E #2 Crabapple 10 Hardwoods 21"-30"diameter 0 x2 0 x4 0 xg 0 �€I #3 Crabapple 12 Softwoods 12"-24"diameter 0 x1 0 x2 0 x4 0 " #4 Crabapple 10 Softwoods 24"or greater 0 x2 0 x4 0 x8 0 < #6 Crabapple 10 Specimen Trees0 x3 0 x12 0 g x60 _ € D t #7 Crabapple 10 Mitigation Total 0" TOTAL 0 TOTAL 0 TOTAL 0 oze s #111 Norway Maple 18 •0"DUE TO ALLOWABLE REMOVAL PERCENTAGE o � #125 Green Ash 26 E #134 Green Ash 21 Add mitigation numbers for Significant Woodlands 0 0 0 € € � #146 White Oak 7 "A" "B" CATEGOR CATEGOR CATEGOR owes E #159 Black Ash 7 Y Y Y aa� #165 Black Ash 7 ¢y a = E #166 Black Ash 8 'Owner/Developer must plant numbers of trees as listed in only one of three categories #175 Green Ash 11 - #183 Green Ash 6 TOTAL 175 Multiply by(30%)= 52.5 Allowable tree removal without mitigation Z F Actual sig.tree removals= 6 W Mitigation required(No) 0 Total#of significant trees that need to be mitigated (Eliminate smallest trees first) ~ Q Q Z U ] Q STEP#2 SIGNIFICANT WOODLANDS ON SITE 0 SQ/FT of Canopy(Figured by Owner/Developer) H71tyrity Deposlte/Performance Bond Q _1 e ALLOWABLE REMOVAL(30%) N/A SQ/FT ( eposit Worksheet) z W a" (� SIGNIFICANT WOODLANDS REMOVED 0 SQ/FT of Canopy(Figured by Owner/Developer) Q W WOODLAND AREA TO MITIGATE 0 SQ/FT the number of total replacements $0SUBTRACT SIGNIFICANT TREES AREA 0 SQ/FT of Canopy(Figuredby Owner/Developer) d for Category"B"by 2.5" z AREA TO MITIGATE 0 SQ/FT DIVIDE BY 125 AND REPLACE 0 TREES AS FOLLOWS: y above figure by$150.00 x$150 w H a U) Q E One Category"A"Trees N/A w > J 3 or Total Security Deposit Required $0 Y w Two Category"B"Trees N/A Q 0 W O D or JOU) Uj Four Category"C"Trees N/A i ~ Q z 0- UJ wcq p U O J i W 3 DATE 03/20/2015 PROJECT NO. K 160755001 SHEET NUMBER E F5 6105 _ Hdl S3MVM'NN1 006K 'ON'Jn NW 9l-OS-f0 '31V0 A9 03N33HO W N3N lYN'd OOpl -IVI1N30IS3b Jla o CO " ILUr ,V1053 W ryas AB NMVHO NV]d J?13 N OOM NA'A3-1-IVA N301095IWd sinoi •1S Qo w� , (O L dN , � ua�H `,•� 3 V15 3H m5N3J11 Ain.V NYOI 1V�UNYV.b3. >7 03X91$30 "o 0 w //1 �� 1J3NI0 AN N30Nn NO 3N AS 03NVd3Nd SVM 1NOd3N 1S3M�i2ib'd 1t211N3� Hl O_.— S (J NO NOOVOIJIJ3d5'NVId S-AVM AJAN30 AN3N3H I O w 31VOS Gp �0H¢ �W08 � 1 I �g� pw o�w �a r 7fi 7�j F$pm kw'$11-os(n r •/ ¢W fjF! t tLl ��ap sU�oww Oywy�� ¢ U w ZOo�� a�08�h }} wq p ¢i Opp O� Oi.p¢. w�Oi wOQ� !yyyr �a li¢ ==rc Qf1 J"=' a3 ac�p Oaoi N W �O•-Z8 VJ,p m4 0Za LU 4 0Q �w U Of Lu n• Aa oz 'rr U= ,z p 'w Jozw3 P ?fFm~ <a o � ii I � I fxll ��,�' tiF\..n FL rq, Ar W 1\•\\\1`�• 1 v O w Z J <0 V S� n.� a 0 r y 1 .1 I O 6 � T d r (V M N f IL >.av PVP H.>Jc,1wIN.�Amvwl mo .v n>4r'> =..v P av HenolmP.P H>Iw•N>an=. .>v1H+)w =nl N m,mv PHu ,.N'P wlw rw wn ..a.na>u>•a.. P P 1�>!llw P.PNV3W 9'opr..W ivawv)rvl w .'WVr.4 W ».W cu01aP P qmw»a�0 411.+.W.6a iurwn»P.I41 Q CO U O 1N a..LL CONSTRUCTION PLANS FOR CENTRAL PARK W UTICA AVENUE F 8 p 3E R VE - MENT ST. LOUIS PARK / GOLDEN VALLEY, MINNESOTA = s PREPARED FOR: . INDEX OF SHEETS t 6310 TITLE SHEET 6 DLC 6311 GENERAL NOTES A. to RESIDENTIAL 6320 SWPPP NOTES a 6321 PHASE 1 EROSION & SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLANg s 6322 PHASE 2 EROSION & SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN =J' 36 n u 6323 SCHEDULE, INFORMATION, AND SUMMARY TABLES �;<o u d O s DNML RD 3 "" U � _ k �� V[IST A GEN REST R°. 6324 EROSION & SEDIMENTATION CONTROL DETAILSm`� 4T.rL00.1DA CT.w LAUREL AVE.0 E "E`"`' PROJECT LOCATION 6325 EROSION & SEDIMENTATION CONTROL DETAILS UL €�o 3 ST. W = ¢< GIT-DEIN-1„ILLS DR= Q° Nwp _ 6330 EXISTING CONDITIONS & REMOVALS PLAN CIRCLE ➢a�H 5. ~ Ra-pe 6340 STREET PROFILE & PAVEMENT LAYOUT PLAN R 21-q STREET PROFILE & PAVEMENT LAYOUT PLAN gags' n HLWD 6341 i 6342 STREET PROFILE & PAVEMENT LAYOUT PLAN = <W.I,tR < < H 6343 TYPICAL SECTIONS O - e W.q,6tg rc tr ST. W. 16u ST. ` We A<f�T 6350 STORM SEWER PLAN & PROFILE N m m 6351 STORM SEWER LATERALS ` 1B tN u GAMBLE OR. c j 55.N WILLOW LA. �i < � s W. Ieth c CEDAR 6360 UTILITY PLAN & PROFILE u S T. 2 56.S VILLGW LA. yi o iT5 `'f 6361 UTILITY PLAN & PROFILE a a ffA °� PARKLW.QY Pa . 6370 SIGNAGE & STRIPING PLAN 2eM ST. rc - a` 6371 SIGNAGE & STRIPING PLAN W r ` 23Ra d 6372 SIGNAGE & STRIPING PLAN BTW 6380 PHOTOMETRIC PLAN W j f S4- rd ST. S• STEPRENS< p0. V jAV>S` B N' o W. 25 IR ST. s w La e"n®° E 6400 LANDSCAPE PLAN = j 50.GLENNUBST PL. !y V.251h t 'c . I V W. 26th STW n,p �s < 6401 LANDSCAPE DETAILS W. 261h ST. WW. 6402 LANDSCAPE PRESERVATION PLAN LU v. 2 tM ST. 6 Q > 6 v. t9'St. 6403 LANDSCAPE PRESERVATION PLAN —I ` 28 th I ST. < Wr_ o ` W. 2 ST. �fI o LA KE: 6500 DETAILS <OTTAWA PL m n YST.�.� a 50 6510 DETAILS F— V. F 29th ST. a � z3 °AIS 6520 DETAILS 6530 DETAILS UTILITIES: CONTACTS: W 6540 DETAILS = Qwest: Developer/Owner- 6550 CONCRETE JOINTING DETAILS Z w 3 6244 Cedar Ave S. DEC Residential,LLC LTJ J 6600 CROSS SECTIONS ¢ —� Richfield, 51 55423 5245 Wayzata Blvd. NORTH 6601 CROSS SECTIONS ¢ U) > Phone: (651)312.5421 St Louis Park, MN 55416 s Contact: Justin Johnson Phone: (612)Kauffman 6901 LINEAR PARK SITE & PAVING PLAN O � Z a Contact: Rich Kauffman iii Center Point Energy. N W 700 Linden Ave W. Cinl Engineering Consultant: 6902 LINEAR PARK GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN a o Q 1Z- PO e 6 PO Box 1165 Kimley-Hom Minneapolis, MN 55401 2550 UniversityAvenue West, Suite 238N 6903 LINEAR PARK GRADING & DRAINAGE DETAILS l-- Z 0 O w Phone: (612) 321.5426 St. Paul, MN 5114 P@ _ ,.-.m,, �......,,� 6904 LINEAR PARK GRADING & DRAINAGE DETAILS w w Contact: Andrew Balgobin Phone: (651) 645.4197 ' -� �: +. 6905 LINEAR PARK PHOTOMETRIC PLAN Uj Y Z w i Contact: Lucas C. Payne. PE y ""'"' Z - Xcel Energy. 6906 LINEAR PARK LANDSCAPE PLAN Y O 1518 Chestnut Ave N.-First Floor Municipality. [ �� - CJ Minneapolis, MN 55403 City of Saint Louis Park '._ � °� �I a a 0 6 Phone: (512)630.4127 5005 Minnetonka Boulevard L 0 ?: 15 Contact: David Fitch St. Louis Park, MN 55416 ( ' J 2 E5 r, e: Phone: (952) 924.2574 Comcast Cable: �' O 6 (952) 924.2687 J i 9705 Data Park Contact: Sean Walther, Senior Planner k3f. ALERT TO CONTRACTOR: Z F– Minnetonka. MN 55343 1. CONTRACTORMTOCD RDINATEUTICAAVENUEPLANSWITHCENTRALPARKWEST%ANS.UTICA Phone: (651) 493.5303 Debra Heiser, Engineering Director AVENUE AND CENTRAL PARK WEST TO BE CONSTRUCTED UNDER ONE NPOES PERMIT. 11.1 i Contacts: Duane Carlson Municipality. C..) € City of Golden Valley DATE Level 3 Communications: 7800 Golden Valle road 03/13/2015 5480 TT Rd. y RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: DATE: ALERT TO CONTRACTOR: € Golden Valle MN 55427 ALL CONTRACTORS MUST CONTACT PROJECT NO. s Minnetonka, MN 55343 y' CITY ENGINEER. CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK 1. THE PRESENCE OFNSIDER TIONF RTHIS ISSUE, NPOONTHIS PROJECT.('ANTRIOTOR'S BID 9 Phone: (763) 893.8000 GOPHER STATE CALL ONE SHALL INCLUDECONSIDERATIONFORTHISISSUE.YNIENPEAFORMINGGRADWGOPERATONS 16O7SSDO1 Phone: (952)351.2353 – Office Contact: Jeff Oliver. Cit Engineer DURING PERIODS OFWETWEATHER,PROVIDE ADEOUATEDEWATERING,DRAINAGEANDGROUND E (612) 805.6827 - Mobile Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager MN TOLL FREE 1-800-252-1166 WATER MANAGEMENT TO CONTROL MOISTURE OF S0IL5.REFERTOMASTERSITESPECIRCA71ONIS SHEET NUMBER 9 9 RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: DATE: BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS .{ Contact: Bob Strong (bob.strongO-13.com) CITY ENGINEER, CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY TWIN CITY AREA 651-454-0002 2� ALL GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED(EARTIMORK RNALUTHITIES,AND FINAL 63 I 0 j GRADINGIBYTHE M ILESTONEDATEINPROJECTDCCUMENTS. ,GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES 24. IMPROVEMENTS TO UTICA AVENUE ARE TO INCLUDE FIBER OPTIC INSTALLATION AS PART OF TRAFFIC CONTROL NOTES TURNING IT OVER TO THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK. 1. THE CONTRACTOR AND SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THE `CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DESIGN OF A DETAILED TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION" (LATEST EDITION) AND BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THE FOR EACH PHASE OF CONSTRUCTION. THE DESIGN OF THE TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANS SHALL BE CONTENTS PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK, AND, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL WORK SHALL 6 CONFORM AS APPLICABLE TO THESE STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. PAVING, GRADING AND DRAINAGE NOTES INCIDENTAL TO THE TRAFFIC CONTROL, 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANS TO THE ENGINEER FOR REVIEW AND 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL 8E RESPONSIBLE FOR FURNISHING ALL MATERIAL AND LABOR TO 1. ALL PAVING, CONSTRUCTION, MATERIALS, AND WORKMANSHIP WITHIN JURISDICTION'S RIGHT-OF-WAY APPROVAL. CONSTRUCT THE INFRASTRUCTURE AS SHOWN IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROPRIATE APPROVING SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL OR COUNTY SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS (LATEST AUTHORITIES, SPECIFICATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS. CONTRACTOR SHALL CLEAR AND GRUB ALL EDI3. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL SHALL CONFORM AND BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MINNESOTA TION) OR MNDOT SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS (LATEST EDITION) IF N07 COVERED BY LOCAL a AREAS UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, REMOVING TREES, STUMPS, ROOTS, MUCK, EXISTING OR COUNTY REGULATIONS. MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MN MUTCD) AND PART IV, "FIELD MANUAL FOR PAVEMENT AND ALL OTHER DELETERIOUS MATERIAL. TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL ZONE LAYOUTS". b 3. EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE LOCATED ACCORDING TO THE INFORMATION AVAILABLE TO THE 2 ALL UNPAVED AREAS WITHIN THE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE SHALL BE REGRADED AND SEEDED WITH i 3 ENGINEER AT THE TIME OF THE TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY AND HAVE NOT BEEN INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIED MN/DOT MIX NO. 250. 4. TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNING AND DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO THE MN MUTCD. BY THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER. GUARANTEE IS NOT MADE THAT ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND 3. TRAFFIC CONTROL ON ALL STATE, LOCAL AND COUNTY RIGHTS-OF-WAY SHALL MEET THE 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE MINIMUM LANE WIDTHS OF 11 FEET UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED g ARE SHOWN OR THAT THE LOCATION OF THOSE SHOWN ARE ENTIRELY ACCURATE. FINDING THE LOCATION OF ANY EXISTING UTILITIES IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY AND SHALL BE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MANUAL OF UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (U.S. DOT/FHA) AND THE BY THE ENGINEER. 4 DONE BEFORE COMMENCING ANY WORK IN THE VICINITY. FURTHERMORE, THE CONTRACTOR REQUIREMENTS OF THE STATE AND ANY LOCAL AGENCY HAVING JURISDICTION. IN THE EVENT THAT ,o SHALL BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES DUE TO THE CONTRACTOR'S FAILURE TO THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND THE JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT INAGREEMENT, THE MOST STRINGENT SHALL GOVERN. 6. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE STABILIZED AT THE END OF EACH WORKING DAY, THIS INCLUDES = ¢- 6 EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. THE OWNER OR ENGINEER BACK FILLING OF TRENCHES FOR UTILITY CONSTRUCTION AND PLACEMENT OF GRAVEL OR � j;§j WILL ASSUME NO LIABILITY FOR ANY DAMAGES SUSTAINED OR COST INCURRED BECAUSE OF THE 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL GRADE THE SITE TO THE ELEVATIONS INDICATED AND SHALL REGRADE BITUMINOUS PAVING FOR ROAD CONSTRUC110N. OPERATIONS IN THE VICINITY OF EXISTING UTILITIES OR STRUCTURES, NOR FOR TEMPORARY BRACING AND SHORING OF SAME. IF IT IS NECESSARY TO SHORE, BRACE, SWING OR RELOCATE WASHOUTS WHERE THEY OCCUR AFTER EVERY RAINFALL UNTIL A GRASS STAND IS WELL v ' A UTILITY, THE UTILITY COMPANY OR DEPARTMENT AFFECTED SHALL BE CONTACTED AND THEIR ESTABLISHED OR ADEQUATE STABILIZATION OCCURS. COORDINATION OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES1 PERMISSION OBTAINED REGARDING THE METHOD TO USE FOR SUCH WORK. 5. ALL AREAS INDICATED AS PAVEMENT SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TYPICAL S AND PER MN OT SPECIFICATIONS. 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE CONSTRUCTION OF CENTRAL PARK WEST. - 14. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITYPAVEMENT SECTIONS AS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGMN/ DOT TO CONTACT THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES WHICH MAY CONTRACTOR TO MAINTAIN ACCESS TO ALL ADJACENT PARCELS AT ALL TIMES. 3 HAVE BURIED OR AERIAL UTILITIES WITHIN OR NEAR THE CONSTRUCTION AREA BEFORE COMMENCING 6. WHERE NEW PAVEMENT MEETS THE EXISTING PAVEMENT, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SAW CUT THE g WORK. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE 48 HOURS MINIMUM NOTICE TO ALL UTILITY COMPANIES s " PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. EXISTING PAVEMENT A MINIMUM 2" DEEP FOR A SMOOTH AND STRAIGHT JOINT AND MATCH THE E_ R EXISTING PAVEMENT ELEVATION WITH THE PROPOSED PAVEMENT UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. _p Y a5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ALL REQUIRED CONSTRUC11ON PERMITSpip AND BONDS IF REQUIRED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL FILTER FABRIC OVER ALL DRAINAGE STRUCTURES FOR THE 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE AVAILABLE AT THE JOB SITE AT ALL TIMES ONE COPY OF THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION AND UNTIL ACCEPTANCE OF THE PROJECT BY THE OWNER. ALL pa€ SHALL BE CLEANED OF DEBRIS AS REQUIRED DURING AND AT THE END OF CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND COPIES OF ANY REQUIRED CONSTRUCTION PERMITS. DRAINAGE STRUCTURES €mpg !2; CONSTRUCTION TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE FLOWS. �I ETHE OWNER AND ENGINEER BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. NO FIELD CHANGES OR DEVIATIONS FROM 7. ANY DISCREPANCIES ON THE DRAWINGS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF g• STRIP TOPSOIL AND ORGANIC MATTER FROM ALL AREAS OF THE SITE AS REQUIRED. IN SOME CASES Lig 3� TOPSOIL MAY BE STOCKPILED ON SITE FOR PLACEMENT WITHIN LANDSCAPED AREAS BUT ONLY AS WIb DESIGN ARE TO BE MADE WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE OWNER AND NOTIFICATION TO :bad s' THE ENGINEER. DIRECTED BY THE OWNER. e8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING THAT THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 9. ALL CUT OR FILL SLOPES SHALL BE 4 (HORIZONTAL) :1 (VERTICAL) OR FLATTER UNLESS OTHERWISEggo 0 t SHOWN ON THE PLANS DO NOT CONFLICT WITH ANY KNOWN EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS. IF ANY SHOWN. CONFLICTS ARE DISCOVERED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY PORTION OF THE SITE WORK THAT WOULD BE AFFECTED. FAILURE TO NOTIFY OWNER OF 10.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONTROL OF DUST AND DIRT RISING AND °z s AN IDENTIFIABLE CONFLICT PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH INSTALLATION RELIEVES OWNER OF ANY SCATTERING IN THE AIR DURING CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL PROVIDE WATER SPRINKLING OR OTHER < 6 m 8 6 OBLIGATION TO PAY FOR A RELATED CHANGE ORDER. SUITABLE METHODS OF CONTROL. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL GOVERNING b € 3 s REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION. S 0 o b 13. SELECT GRANULAR SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF MNDOT SPEC. 3149. 0. SUITABLE GRADING MATERIAL FROM ALL POR11ONS OF THE PROJECT SHALL BE USED IN FILL AREAS, 11. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL UNDERGROUND STORM WATER PIPING PER MANUFACTURER'S UJ AS REQUIRED, THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT. RECOMMENDATIONS AND/OR AS REQUIRED BY THE LOCAL JURISDICTION. L(J A1. THE GRADING GRADE ON THIS PROJECT IS DEFINED AS THE BOTTOM OF THE AGGREGATE BASE. THE 12.ALL PROPOSED CONCRETE SHALL BE HIGH-EARLY STRENGTH CONCRETE PER MN/DOT 2461. O PROPOSED GRADE ON THIS PROJECT IS DEFINED AS THE TOP OF PAVEMENT. 13.INSTALL CONCRETE PAVING AND CURBING PER CITY OF ST. LOTUS PARK STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR z �12. UNDERGROUND UTll1TIES EXIST WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE ALL CONSTRUCTION AND DETAILS SHOWN IN THE PLANS. J UNDERGROUND WORK SCHEDULE WITH UTILLIITY COMPACATED INY CREWS OR TO EPERFORMING RELOCATIONSTART OF NWORK.AND 000RDINATE THE DEMOLITION NOTES Q 113. NO DISPOSAL SITE IS PROVIDED. ANY MATERIAL NOT UTILIZED ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BECOME THE 1. ALL MATERIAL REMOVED FROM THIS SITE BY THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE DISPOSED OF BY THE w PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR FOR DISPOSAL. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DISPOSE OF MATERIAL CONTRACTOR IN A LEGAL MANNER. UNSUITABLE FOR USE DURING CONSTRUCTION. z 2. REFER TO THE TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS OF EXISTING STRUCTURES, ETC., W 4. REMOVALS: BITUMINOUS, DRAINAGE STRUCTURES, PIPE AND OTHER MISCELLANEOUS OBJECTS TO BE LOCATED WITHIN THE PROJECT SITE. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL EXISTING BUILDINGS, ", REMOVED UNDER THIS PROJECT SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND EITHER STRUCTURES, SLABS, CONCRETE, ASPHALT, DEBRIS PILES, SIGNS, AND ALL APPURTENANCES v i RECYCLED OR DISPOSED OF OUTSIDE OF THE PROJECT LIMITS IN ACCORDANCE WITH MNDOT SPEC. SPECIFIED FOR REMOVAL ARE TO BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE BY THE CONTRACTOR AND W 2104• PROPERLY DISPOSED OF IN A LEGAL MANNER AS PART OF THIS CONTRACT. SOME ITEMS TO BE REMOVED MAY NOT BE DEPICTED ON THE TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S Z >- 55. GRADING: WHERE A PROPOSED ROADWAY BEGINS AT OR TERMINATES AT AN EXISTING ROADWAY, W RESPONSIBILITY TO VISIT THE SITE AND DETERMINE THE FULL EXTENT OF ITEMS TO BE REMOVED. J PROVIDE A VERTICAL NOTCH TO THE BOTTOM OF THE AGGREGATE OR BITUMINOUS BASE AND A IF ANY ITEMS ARE IN QUESTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE OWNER PRIOR TO REMOVAL < 1:20 TAPER. OF SAID ITEMS. Q fA j ;I 6. PROVIDE 1:20 TAPERS BETWEEN LONGITUDINAL CHANGES IN SUBCUT DEPTHS. SURVEYINGm a-z Q 1117. USE TACK COAT BETWEEN ALL BITUMINOUS MIXTURES. THE BITUMINOUS TACK COAT MATERIAL SHALL JF- Z a BE APPLIED AT A UNIFORM RATE OF .05 GAL/SQ. YD. THE APPLICATION RATE IS FOR UNDILUTED 1. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ALL CONSTRUCTION STAKING AND SURVEYING AS REQUIRED TO COMPLETE y W 0 N 0 EMULSIONS (AS SUPPLIED FROM THE REFINERY). THE ASPHALT EMULSION MAY BE FURTHER DILUTED THE PROJECT. THIS IS CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO THE CONTRACT. W W - IN THE FIELD IN ACCORDANCE WITH SPEC. 2357. Y W Y Z Lu y 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DOCUMENTING AND MAINTAINING AS-BUILT 5 X18. ALL BITUMINOUS MIXTURES SHALL CONFORM TO SPEC. 2360. INFORMATION WHICH SHALL BE RECORDED AS CONSTRUCTION PROGRESSES OR AT THE COMPLETION O( q j OF APPROPRIATE CONSTRUCTION INTERVALS AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AS-BUILT a a 19. STRIP AND REUSE AS SLOPE DRESSING ALL TOPSOIL AND EXISTING SLOPE DRESSING WHERE DRAWINGS IN PDF AND AUTOCAD FORMAT TO THE OWNER. co a PRESENT IN AREAS TO BE DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION. -4� 0 6 CL OJ 20. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRAFFIC SHOULD BE NO CLOSER THAN AN IMAGINARY 1:2 LINE DRAWN FROM THE BOTTOM OF ANY SUBCUT TO THE TRAVELED SURFACE. W ' U 3 ; 21. COMPACTION OF AGGREGATE ITEMS SHALL BE BY THE "MODIFIED PENETRA11ON INDEX METHOD". DATE 22. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SAWCUT THE FULL DEPTH OF THE EXISTING PAVEMENT, PROVIDE A CLEAN ALERT TO CONTRACTOR: 03/13/2015 ALL CONTRACTORS MUST CONTACT 1 THE PRESENCE OF GROUNDWATER SHOULD BE ANTICIPATED ON TH(SPROJECT CONTRA TOWS BID PROJECT NO. EDGE, AND COAT THE EXPOSED EDGE WITH TACK COAT WHEN PLACING NEW PAVEMENT TO EXISTING. GOPHER STATE CALL ONE SHALLINCLUDECONSIDERATIONFORTHISISSUE.WHENPERFORMINGGRADINGOPERATIONS 160755001 DU RING PERIODS OF WET WEATH ER,PROVIDE ADEQUATE DEWATERING DRAINAGE AND GROUND MN TOLL FREE 1-800-252-1166 WATER MANAGEMENT TO CONTROL MOISTURE OFSOILS.REFERTOMASTERSDESPECIFCATIONS. SHEET NUMBER E 23. PLACE A MINIMUM OF 6" TOPSOIL OR SLOPE DRESSING ON ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS CONSTRUCTION AND SCHEDULED FOR PERMANENT TURF ESTABLISHMENT UNLESS SPECIFIED TWIN CITY AREA 651-454-0002 2. ALL GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED(EARHNORKFlNA UTI ES,ANDFlNA w1 GRADING)BYTHEMILESTONE DATEINPROJECTDOCUMENTS. �� 1 OTHERWISE. V GENERAL NOTES EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES HAZARDOUS MATERIAL MANAGEMENT&SPILL REPORTING SITE A. PROJECT OFFICE WALLPOSTINGS: A CONTRACTOR SHALL IMPLEMENT BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES AS ANY HAZARDOUS OR POTENTIALLY HAZARDOUS MATERIAL THAT IS BROUGHT' THE FOLLOWING ITEMSS MUST BE POSTED TOGETHER IN A SINGLE, REQUIRED BY THIS STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN. ONTO THE CONSTRUCTION SITE SHALL BE HANDLED PROPERLY TO REDUCE THE l,�-s �. ✓__ ' _- - _ ORGANIZED LOCATION ON A WALL INSIDE THE PROJECT OFFICE: 1)SWPPP ADDITIONAL BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED AS POTENTIAL FOR STORMWATER POLLUTION. ALL MATERIALS USED ON THIS �• '- SITE MAPS (ALL PHASES); O OR DETAIL, SHEETS; 3) MAP SHOWING DICTATED BY CONDITIONS AT NO ADDITIONAL COST OF OWNER CONSTRUCTION SITE SHALL BE PROPERLY STORED,HANDLED,DISPENSED AND s c 4><' F � �rn, r.. °• � v < LOCATION OF OFFSITE IMPORT OR EXPORT FACILITY, 4) REVISIONS TO THROUGHOUT ALL PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION. DISPOSED OF FOLLOWING ALL APPLICABLE LABEL DIRECTIONS. FLAMMABLE ' }• g, DETAINS,STYE MAPS,OR SWPPP-RELATED RF[S;5)SITE SWPPP BIFIDER; SWCf AND COMBUSTIBLE LIQUIDS SHALL BE STORED AND HANDLED ACCORDING TO [ Com : - ' •i. *,�.*C a PLACARD; 7) CURRENT OWNER STORMWATER COMPLIANCE TRAINING B. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES(BMP'S)AND CONTROLS SHALL CONFORM APPLICABLE REGULATIONS,AND,AT A MIM MUM,ACCORDING TO 29 CFR 1926.152. {{ r CERTIFICATES FOR SUPERINTENDENT(S) AND COMPLIANCE OFFICER(S);AND TO FEDERAL,STATE,OR LOCAL REQUIREMENTS OR MANUAL OF PRACTICE, ONLY APPROVED CONTAINERS AND PORTABLE TANKS SHALL BE USED FORt ti t ga 8)CERTIFICATIONS AND/OR TRAINING CERTIFICATES REQUIRED TO PERFORM AS APPLICABLE.CONTRACTOR SHALL IMPLEMENT ADDITIONAL CONTROLS STORAGE AND HANDLING OF FLAMMABLE AND COMBUSTIBLE LIQUIDS. x INSPECTIONS BY THE APPLICABLE CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PERMIT OR AS DIRECTED BY PERMITTING AGENCY OR OWNER r t -J- '4 ; •y.3 .T. g AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION. MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEETS(MSDS)INFORMATION SHALL BE KEPT ON SITE �.. i = C. SITE MAP MUST CLEARLY DELINEATE ALL STATE WATERS.PERMITS FOR FOR ANY AND ALL APPLICABLE MATERIALS. HOWEVER,MSDS MAY ALSO BE I ' B. PERMITTED PROJECT AREA: ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IMPACTING STATE WATERS OR REGULATED ACCESSED VIA TELEPHONE OR OTHER ELECTRONIC MEANS OR APPARATUS. L� 1 s 4 's • s FOR PURPOSES OF THIS SWPPP AND ASSOCIATED STORMWATER PERMIT, WETLANDS MUST BE MAINTAINED ON SITE AT ALL TIMES. i f„ _ a 'PERMITTED A'PROJECT AREIS DEFINED AS ANY AND ALL AREAS WITHIN THE IN THE EVENT OF AN ACCIDENTAL SPILL,IMMEDIATE ACTION SHALL BE TAKEN n'~ � b PROJECT LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE,AS SHOWN ON THE SWPPP SITE MAPS AND D. CONTRACTOR TO LIMIT DISTURBANCE OF SITE IN STRICT ACCORDANCE BY THE GC TO CONTAIN AND REMOVE THE SPILLED MATERIAL. THE SPILL SHALL IDENTIFIED IN THE NOTICE OF INTENT TO THE AGENCY. ALL WITH SWPPP IMPLEMENTATION SEQUENCE, OR AS REQUIRED BY THE BE REPORTED TO THE APPROPRIATE AGENCIES IN THE REQUIRED TIME FRAMES. g " GROUND-DISTURBING AND CONSTRUCTION-RELATED ACTIVITIES(MATERIAL APPLICABLE GENERAL PERMIT. NO UNNECESSARY OR IMPROPERLY AS REQUIRED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT,ANY SPILL OR e STORAGE, DUMPSTERS, PARKING AREAS, PROJECT OFFICE TRAILER, ETC.) SEQUENCED CLEARING AND/OR GRADING SHALL BE PERMITTED. DISCHARGE ENTERING WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES SHALL BE PROPERLY Ah. 5 y =I « MUST BE INCLUDED WITHIN THE PERMITTED PROJECT AREA LIMITS OF REPORTED. ' + L 3 a DISTURBANCE. E. ALL DENUDED/BARE AREAS THAT WILL BE INACTIVE FOR 14 DAYS OR MORE, I MUST BE STABILIZED IMMEDIATELY UPON COMPLETION OF MOST RECENT ALL HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, INCLUDING CONTAMINATED SOIL. AND LIQUID GRADING ACTIVITY, WITH THE USE OF FAST-GERMINATING ANNUAL CONCRETE WASTE,SHALL BE DISPOSED OF BY THE CONTRACTOR IN THE MANNER y¢ w Y - ^`•/ ,+' '° O _- GRASS/GRAIN VARIETIES,STRAWIHAY MULCH,WOOD CELLULOSE FIBERS, SPECIFIED BY FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS AND By THE V� :. `• ? ro ' `,. B e OFFSITE AREAS) TO BE DISTURBED AS PART OF THIS PROJECT (NOT ON TACHIIZERS, NETTING AND/OR BLANKETS. COMPLETION MUST BE MANUFACTURER OF SUCH PRODUCTS. o OWNER PROPERTY): ACHIEVED WITHIN 14 DAYS. USGS QUADRANGLE MAP l THE N- SHALL PREPARE A WRITTEN RECORD OF ANY SPILL AND ASSOCIATED w> WORK ASSOCIATED WITH UTICA AVENUE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS. CLEAN-UP ACTIVITIES OF PETROLEUM PRODUCTS OR HAZARDOUS MATERIALS IN � " r F. DISTURBED PORTIONS OF THE SITE WHERE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HAS EXCESS OF I GALLON OR REPORTABLE QUANTITIES,WHICHEVER IS LESS,ON THE n ALL AREAS OUTSIDE THE PERMITTED PROTECT AREA (I.E., LIMITS OF PERMANENTLY STOPPED SHALL BE PERMANENTLY STABILIZED AS SHOWN DAY OF THE SPILL. THE GC SHALL PROVIDE NOTICE TO OWNER,VIA THE ONLINE g s` DISTURBANCE)ACQUIRED FOR USE BY THE GC OR A SUBCONTRACTOR OF ON THE PLANS. THESE AREAS SHALT- BE SEEDED, SODDED, AND/ORECRITICAL INCIDENT REPORT,IMMEDIATELY UPON IDENTIFICATION OF ANY SPILL. SITE R - THE GC(BORROW SOURCES,DISPOSAL AREAS,ETC.)MUST BE MANAGED IN VEGETATED IMMEDIATELY, AND COMPLETED NO LATER THAN 14 DAYS SPILL REPORT FORMS ARE AVAILABLE IN THE ONLINE SWPPP REPORTING SYSTEM x ACCORDANCE WITH APPENDIX E-TAB 21 OF THE 02370 SPECIFICATION. THE AFTER THE LAST CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY OCCURRING IN THESE AREAS. PROVIDED BY THE OWNER COPIES OF SPILL CRITICAL INCIDENT REPORTS SHALL +c a'�• °1• cum Wv" ti CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO LOCATE OFFICE TRAILERS AND MATERIAL REFER TO THE GRADING PLAN AND/OR LANDSCAPE PLAN. BE PRIMED AND MAINTAINED IN THE JOBSITE BINDER I< B„ �✓ �a"c `; aaw r dA°'® ' STORAGE AREAS FOR THE PROJECT WITHIN THE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE. T4 a 5 N O a c+c a2 i n° «. u \ THE CONTRACTOR MAY REQUEST USE OF OFF-SITE LOCATIONS FOR OFFICE G. SLOPES SHALL BE LEFT IN A ROUGHENED CONDITION DURING THE GRADING ANY SPILLS OF PETROLEUM PRODUCTS OR HAZARDOUS MATERIALS IN EXCESS OF 5 TRAILERS OR NON-ERODIBLE MATERIAL STORAGE; HOWEVER, APPROVAL PHASE TO REDUCE RUNOFF VELOCITIES AND EROSION. TEMPORARYREPORTABLE QUANTITIES AS DEFINED BY EPA OR THE STATE OR LOCAL AGENCY Es € MUST BE OBTAINED FROM THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER,THE CEC AND THE AND/OR PERMANENT STABILIZATION SHALL BE APPLIED PER REGULATIONS, SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY REPORTED TO THE EPA NATIONAL cm a Y "' rn u r+-E+cacsx an + WAL-MART SWCf PRIOR TO THEIR USE. REQUESTS WILL BE REVIEWED ON A REQUIREMENTS IN THESE E&S CONTROL NOTES. RESPONSE CENTER (I-800424-8802) AND THE WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF tl� •ve.« * � g 5 CASE BY CASE BASIS AND IF APPROVED, LIMITATIONS ON USE WILT, BE NATURAL RESOURCES(1-800-943-0003) k h F eb�Jj • „cy 8 ` € y� PROVIDED BY THE CEC H. DUE TO Tiff GRADE CHANGES DURING THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROJECT, R rmDa THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ADJUSTING THE EROSION THE STATE REQUIRES REPORTING WHEN: uvHs<,<° ;3 3 U z C. SPECIAL PROJECT AREAS: AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES (SILT FENCES, ETC.) TO PREVENT zn.n $�g + " �' Tam`3 s ' THERE ARE NO SPECIAL PROJECTS, LOCATED BEYOND THE OWNER EROSION AND POLLUTANT DISCHARGE OFFSITE. THERE IS AN IMPACT TO HUMAN HEALTH s�vs 'i E PERMITTED PROJECT AREA, REQUIRING INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE • THERE IS AN IMPACT TO THE ENVIRONMENT u 12FN �o�H 3n ASSOCIATED WITH THIS CONSTRUCTIONPROJECT. I. ALL MEASURES STATED ON THIS SITE MAP,AND IN THE STORM WATER • THERE ISA FIRE,EXPLOSION,OR SAFETY HAZARD < 5 vLro"r" „ �6e Bv POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN, SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN FULLYA SPILL IS NOT IMMEDIATELY CLEANED UP v.+a D.1 NON-STORMWATER DISCHARGES: FUNCTIONAL CONDITION UNTIL NO LONGER REQUIRED FOR A COMPLETED THE SPILL WAS MORE THAN THE REPORTABLE QUANTITY OF 1 GALLONBr o g`b � THE GENERAL PERMIT FOR STORMWATER DISCHARGES ASSOCIATED WITH PHASE OF WORK OR FINAL STABILIZATION OF THE SITE.ALL EROSION AND • OF A PETROLEUM PRODUCT v, mA o 99 i �i �, ,. wen 4 La gob"F CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES PROHIBITS MOST NON-STORMWATER SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE CHECKED BY A QUALIFIED 9 `v a �'_ _ DISCHARGES DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE. ALLOWABLE PERSON IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS OR THE THE REPORT SHOULD BE FILED WITH THE STATE OF WISCONSIN IN • _ir3€b a s T. : x.s.viuov c• NON-STORMWATER DISCFIARGES THAT OCCUR DURING CONSTRUCTION ON APPLICABLE PERMIT,WHICHEVER 1S MORE STRINGENT,AND REPAIRED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER NR 706 OF THE WISCONSIN ADMIMSTRATiVE � d �' A 8 THIS PROJECT,ARE INCLUDEDINTHE SECTION 52 OF THE GENERAL PERMIT. ACCORDANCE WITH THE SITE PLANS. CODE. ALL REPORTS SHOULD BE FILED WITHIN 24 HOURS OF A SPILL / •,c © r«nKn...c OCCURRING. _ f D". m z m BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMPS)MUST BE IMPLEMENTED FOR THE 1. STORM WATER POLLUTANT CONTROL MEASURES INSTALLED DURING N m LOU a // _ a GENERAL PERMIT ALLOWABLE DISCHARGES FOR THE DURATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION,THAT WILL ALSO PROVIDE STORM WATER MANAGEMENT `+I U � LOU a PERMIT. THE TECHNIQUES DESCRIBED IN THIS SWPPP FOCUS ON PROVIDING AFTER CONSTRUCTION,ARE INCLUDED IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS.THE THE REPORTABLE QUANTITY FOR HAZARDOUS MATERIALS CAN BE FOUND IN40 P R�+ CONTROL OF POLLUTANT DISCHARGES WITH PRACTICAL APPROACHES THAT SITE-SPECIFTC POST CONSTRUCTION STORM WATER OPERATION AND CFA 302 AND THE US EPA WEBSITE: + UTILIZE READILY AVAILABLE EXPERTISE,MATERIAL,AND E Ia n.N7 5•F• sTcrnc"s we. ap P S _ EQUIPMENT. MAINTENANCE (O&M) MANUAL IS INCLUDED IN THE CONTRACT I E DOCUMENTS. HTTP://WWW.EPA-GOV/SUPERFUND/POLICY/RELEASE/RQ AND THE i TL0. ussvm° nD. R NON-STORMWATER COMPONENTS OF SITE DISCHARGES MUST BE ADMINISTRATIVE RULES OF SOUTH DAKOTA(ARSD)74:34:01:03, ` v ST.T 5 16 fiLEMNRST R. v. sr.j a UNCONTAMINATED NON-TURBID WATER ALL NON-STORMWATER K ALL PERMANENT CONTROLS AND SYSTEMS MUST BE INSTALLED AND HTTP:/ILEGIS.STATE.SD.US/RULES/INDEX DISCHARGES MUST BE ROUTED TO A STORMWATER CONTROL PRIOR TO FUNCTIONING AS DESIGNED AND FREE OF ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT AND DISCHARGE. WATER USED FOR CONSTRUCTION WHICH DISCHARGES FROM DEBRIS DURING FINAL PROJECT INSPECTION AND APPROVAL. AISL TO MINIMIZE THE POTENTIAL FOR A SPILL- OF PETROLEUM PRODUCT OR VICINITY MAP LULu THE SITE MUST ORIGINATE FROM A PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY OR PRIVATE WELL HAZARDOUS MATERIALS TO COME IN CONTACT WITH STORMWATER, THE O APPROVED BY THE STATE HEALTH DEPARTMENT. WATER USED FOR FOLLOWING STEPS SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED: aseoarnvr:cc Is xo use carr OF co+.oa"vv.uu.Y me"Taluo xaucx Rouras cc xo oss THE axoaxasr g CONSTRUCTION THAT DOES NOT ORIGINATE FROM AN APPROVED PUBLIC ROME TO THB7IS O FROM n CIxOOFCALOBNVALLgYIDBMIX®TRTXX }I'g SUPPLY MUST NOT DISCHARGE FROM THE SITE; R CAN BE RETAINED IN 1)ALL MATERIALS WITH HAZARDOUS PROPERTIES, SUCH AS PESTICIDES, z RETENTION PONDS UNTIL A INFILTRATES S E,IT MUST WHEN PETROLEUM PRODUCTS,FERTILIZERS,SOAPS,DETERGENTS,CONSTRUCTION a ➢ NON-STORMWATER 1S DISCHARGED FROM THE SITE,IT MUST BE DONE IN A CHEMICALS,ACIDS,BASES,PAIRS,PRIM SOLVENTS,ADDITIVES FOR SOIL MANNER SUCH THAT IT DOES NOT CAUSE EROSION OF THE SOIL,DURING STABILIZATION, CONCRETE. COMPOUNDS AND ADDITIVES, ETC., a e DISCHARGE. SHALL BE STORED IN A SECURE LOCATION, UNDER COVER AND IN APPROPRIATE,TIGHTLY SEALED CONTAINERS WHEN USE. ` 1 d D2 POWERWASHING: S PROCESS WATER SUCH AS POWER WASHING WATER AND CONCRETE CUTTING 2)THE MINIMUM PRACTICAL QUANTITY OF ALL SUCH MATERIALS SHALL BE EFFLUENT, AMONG OTHERS, MUST BE COLLECTED FOR TREATMENT AND KEPT ON THE JOB SITE AND SCHEDULED FOR DELIVERY AS CLOSE TO TIME OF co DISPOSAL. IT MUST NOT BE FLUSHED INTO THE SITE STORM DRAIN SYSTEM USE AS PRACTICAL. OR DISCHARGED OFF-SITE. 3)A SPILL CONTROL AND CONTAINMENT KIT (CONTAINING FOR EXAMPLE, D. DISCHARGE POINTS: ALL DISCHARGE POINTS MUST BE INSPECTED TO DETERMINE WHETHER ABSORBENT MATERIAL SUCH AS KITTY I=OR SAWDUST,ACID,BASE, W i NEUTRALIZING AGENT,BROOMS,DUST PANS,MOPS,RAGS,GLOVES,GOGGLES, 35 EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES ARE EFFECTIVE IN PLASTIC AND METAL TRASH CONTAINERS,ETC.)SHALL BE PROVIDED AT THE D PREVENTING DISCHARGE OF SEDIMENT FROM THE SITE AND/OR IMPACTS TO CONSTRUCTION SITE AND ITS LOCATIONz (S) SHALL BE IDENTIFIED WITH W W RECEIVING WATERS. SEDIMENT ACCUMULATION DOWNGRADIENT OF LEGIBLE SIGNAGE AND SHOWN ON SITE MAPS. 3 DISCHARGE LOCATIONS SHALL BE REPORTED AS A SEDIMENT DISCHARGE a.TIE SPILL CONTROL AND CONTAINMENT KIT SUPPLIES SHALL BE OF Q a (SEE APPENDIX E-TAB 14,SEDIMENT RELEASES,OF THE 02370 SPECIFICATION) SUFFICIENT QUANTITIES AND APPROPRIATE COMER TO CONTAIN A Q AND THE POTENTIAL UPSTREAM CAUSE SHALL BE INVESTIGATED TO SPILL FROM THE LARGEST ANTICIPATED PIECE OF EQUIPMENT AND FROM zZQ PREVENT FUTURE OCCURRENCE. CONTACT THE CM,CEC AND SWCT TO THE LARGEST ANTICIPATED QUANTITIES OF PRODUCTS STORED ON THE V J z MEQ DETERMINE APPROPRIATE ACTION FOR CLEANUP OF DISCHARGED SEDIMENT SITE AT ANY GIVEN TI . ? __all LLI THAT MAYBE OUTSIDE OF THE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE. SEE SAMPLING AND b.CONTENTS SHALL BE INSPECTED DAILY DURING THE DAILY Q MONITORING OF EFFLUENT PLAN(IF APPLICABLE). STORMWATER INSPECTION. Z Q O W o W W V5 4)ALL PRODUCTS SHALL BE STORED IN AND USED FROM THE ORIGINAL CONTAINER WITH THE ORIGINAL PRODUCT LABEL. CONTAINERS MUST BE YW E STORED IN�DAp MAA R TO PROTECT THEM FROM THE ELEMENTS AND O z INCIDENTJ 5)ALL PRODUCTS SHALL BE USED IN STRICT COMPLIANCE WITH INSTRUCTIONS Qa T ON THE PRODUCT LABEL. a Cn 0 J a 5 6)THE DISPOSAL OF EXCESS OR USED PRODUCTS SHALL BE IN STRICT O a COMPLIANCE WITH INSTRUCTIONS ON THE PRODUCT LABEL AND ' I REGULATIONS. z W 3_ 0 DATE 03/13/2015 PROJECT N0. 160755001 � E SHEET NUMBER 6320 'J IPI P1 It . ........ .. R I,.,a L- S"k.14- ..... __q_ A. CE It it IPI ORA][AGE-AREA Ja 1.18 AC. m it -'k-. jZ - SF >> Z it '7\ 41E l LOt\2-RESIDENTIAL PI Bm MAGARY IF F-61 ff 6 ST PD1 3rrEOtfrFALL D IF .77 f D LINEAR PARK- IF' PRIVATELY OWNED @ PUBLIC OPEN SPA Z REFER TO OFF-SITE AMW CE I PLANS gV Fill Ipi DRAINAGE AREA*2 • p Or* 7.86 AQ P1 ly SF h'1 1; ji T 000� TEMPORARY 0 0 0 0 0 000 1: ACCESS PATH 0 �o BITUMINOUS T )o O C 00 0 0 _o,,OOc— Z, rS)j E 0 9 - ♦ I I _-Q_�� 3 P E -PROVIDE TEMPORARY y A?., ST. LOUIS RAR CITY 6 K CULVERTASREQURWM 00 000 CARRY FLOWS FROM E5� )0 000 yDIVE SIGN 00 0 0000 CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY al 0000 000 0 0000 T_ V, 2, SIB • Z R z 0 < < z a- .................. A j Lij Z uj D S @�JJJ .- CONTACT 5 ALL CONTRACTORS MUST SIC GOPHER STATE CALL ONE U) o 0 ........... ALE IN FE 000! GRAPHIC SC ET our MIN TOLL FREE 1-800-252-1166 0 25 50 10 c I I 1 , 77- BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS - 0 ui SIF TWIN CITY AREA 651-454-0002 a- z cl) LLI Lo 7 C) (I ap" EROSION DETAILS ....... z� SS S-11 INFORMATION SI- Sr4 716 , - - -- - - - " - , - - -1--o - C=39= Hwy NO LLI 100 ROAD DRAIN INLET PROTECTION Z LU LU GUTTER 81113DI INLET PR=TC. > --I (D FILTER�.INLET PROTECTION < > SWPPP IMP;LEMENTATICIN SEQUENCE EROSION NOTES S2 z Lu CMWW=W EXG.RAFFAOCMT11WOFNOR ce TEMPORARY ONSTRUCIIIIN 113T a- c) < EROSION CONTROL NOTES. APPROXIMATE SOIL BOUNDARY `7"'BERE_-r- NOT 1_� TRF LOD MM VICUO AliD FROMNEPITLY, MiURIOUl I'FOR Z _c v. 0 0 LU SITE FEATURES 1. Al_1_P5 PERIMETER SILT FENCE AND ROCK CONSTRUCTION BE TEMPORARY SEED'..AND MUILG. c__ L LN-Il-OF. Tae THE�CONSTRO7TI011 CD R-01-DAM T__T�_OMI PIG AllO RTORAOF AREAS -ONLY THR LUTELF N-1 TO PROPERTY UNE INSTALLED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. (n Ui II RMTS)lIOU MTki-,IIET-011- TIt W W 55 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE WINS PRIOR M STI]EGRADING, smO®vTON THE C--THE TO I— TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN 3� Lu �e� z LU --------- TEMPIDRARYGRADINGEASSMENT :OIL TYPE'URBAN �DORTHENTS.WET > Z 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL CATCH BASI N EROSION CONTROL MEASURES. 6 USSMRATUM,COMPLEX, 0 T. HUT ULwLTivTTps 0 ........ PROPOSED LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE k WITHIN TWO WEEKS OF SITE GRADING,AL DI.TURMDAREASSHALI.BESTASI�O TO 2 PERCENTSUOPES WITH SEED,SOD.OR ROCK BASE.REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLANS MR NIATERIALS, < 501 TYPE URBAN-0 0DORTHENTS CONTTHE M TO PEFFINDI I-MCITONI iI.PIl0 UST O-M BEFORE STORIIIIIATER NUQ -111-1 PARKING AND I-A.AREA Q. a. U) 5. ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE NSTALLEDANOMANTNNEDIN U6B (CUT ANO ALL eecEmoTa EXISTINGMAJOR CONTOUR ACCORDANCE WITH CITY.AND WATERSHED ISIRIT PERMITS. I -BW CERTUll-I MF=OM�ZMT EF FORII RXIlIX,IEO lITTION 0 ee CERTTPUDI TF ONE OR F C NOT WTO BE RESOLVED -OF THE.-CERT.-TION ZN=lVlTNl`I TBE BWM� LLLCCC 6L N�.LMEASURES,I CILUDING BY-C TEMPORARY SILT FENCE -1 EXISTING MINORCONTOUR T E CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ALL ER THE REMOVAL OF SILT IN FRONT OF SILT FENCES DURINGTHE OURATIONOFTHE IF THEIS UNABLE TO CEIRTITI TEAT STEARE -,�r I.-TIONS I-IITON OFMM BE REI THE CONSTRUCTION. -FAE-TR-T[-..TI-.AOC-- z ALERT TO CONTRACTOR: ILL] FLOW/SLOKAIRROW 7. ANY EXCESS SEDIMENT IN PROPOSED BASINSSHALL BEREMOVED BYTHE ST" AT" FRccgvsravrnoN Al�lIilTB THE CM 0CWSTRL� > rpp�l 0 TP 0 Q okp 0 :, � C 0,00 0 O-c' Oc C t b 0 0-0-C 00 00 RE-RE- T= TEMPORARY DIVERSION 1, THE PRESENCE OF GROUNDWATER...UL BE ANTICIPATEDON THISPROJECT.CONTRACTORS BID R==� U= CONTRACTOR. S ALL INCLUDE CONSIDERATION FOR THIS ISSUE.MEN MIRFORMINGGRADINGOP11RATIONS - - - - - > EXISTINGSTORMSIMER DURING PERIODS OF WET WEATHER,PROVIDE ADEQUATE DEWATERING,DRAINAGE ANDGROUND --- DATE 5 8. REMOVAL ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURESAFTERVEGETADON ISESTABLISHED. WATER MANAGEMENT TO CONTROL MOISTURE OF SOILS. SEDIMENT BASIN OUTFALL LOCAION 03/13/2015 77 _Y TOSEDDIOVfTBF&NLI LE NFOR SPOIL @ EXISTING STORM SEINER MANHOLE IL THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL SOILS AND SEGMENTTRAGIIEDONTO EXISTING 2. ALL GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED(EARTHWGRK RNA_UTILlTES,AND MAIL ___OU PROJECT NO. STREETS AND PAVEDARES. GRADING)BY THE MILESTONE DAM IN PROJECI'DOCUMENTS, 160755001 1 11 __ eorroN Am FLO_OF T_,Nm OF RIO RAP PAD EXISTINGCURBINUET 10. IFB1_0 NO DUST BECOMES A NUISANCE.THE CONTRACTOR AM SHEET NUMBER FROM ATANKTRUCKTOALLMNSTRICGICNAREAS. M ST LIMITS OF DRAINASESUS�BASIN 11. SWEEP ADJACENT STREET IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY REQUIREMENTS. CC::��MUMMs OOL�LOM FLOW LM OFC IONT'ROL RGO-RFS ON AND REPO.FERTLL[M i0fD EROSON T_ OTHLREROMONREINTASWW 6321 �V SN°ISN3tle,,, dO1 IVIlN3aIS32i Ola 3'OX BI-CI-CB 3LV0 AS 03WJ31q Nb'-ld IO�I1N00 V10S3NNIW o Z o CV n�Vd va"J�MM •=B y Y109XWX JO siW AB wvuo 1N W 14 S 'S ',l3llVA N30109\MWd SUIOI.IS N "' (�� t 3 V15 3 LL J SMY 3W■30M tlm■Xa T X0653 Otld Q\U'n Z n Va�H K<�(?�Ua�� mum° "rmn uo i";da�.m°ud saM"me S,W AB a3mMa SNb'ld 1N3W3A02ldWlCO tl�mtlX, BIX,1V LL JBY 0 A■Btl3X I gs o aaALoN NOISO� Z StHd 3nN3AV voun 1S3M °N NaVd lV2ilN3O a z yW LU B RIP wzl 0 a 3 RR J ? Zam ! O' `\ \\ a E y �� § 1-51F a ao W MONN m r m _.. 7 a \ n a w w w30 dq zb,' , P o a9y os� ggS � WFw-O Z�u. { •.�.'�•, �` Mph O�h i gmt4 N °Cz Ci,. 't`•'• `!'` O32.P• '�;•\'�•• d ♦••�•ii\`P N M iOJ =°oo \ \: ': :iaZG;f: f' a \ \e .�.•.ti`\ �• a r zA i 0 0; r C • •• (� nns .•r.rsa d LL I \I10 L.❑ .❑ o' rl G :� t Lu Q Ii I ❑ m ❑ $¢tet .1 LL JwLL 1 r Pil I \\ ww � _w� _ 0 �wLLw° xo ! ¢Oz p �IV \ �f IT W o °how E s 0 ez LJ'-----mac---- -- 0 771 Oo°u°ww 0i 7 W 03 Z mei s f ., t �■■. ■,■.nn„dNu■,f,�,nt uury, : ly I I J ^y s�.w 4 5 • J I _ Q . ISS � S_�� nnnniun■$u■ ennui,i■i■Biu:.:.i.:..:.Yd.:.d.id.■1■Yd■in: iR, I 1 � � — �• I I I � 'tl •�� l�/ I 1 Z. t� tjil X3Etx.' y - U 12 . . ;`. —.—■�N—”J—'.-----��1 1t \ i.. f I � ( ( � H rc p Ya O m M TO O T O 01' a Jill I2t' i 1 it 11 - I! I( I il(t 6 l ill ry /�/ lirAll ="( V1 * ! ` /l'll / W o a ZIlli O - I '43�NIC7 1 J 1! F "� I �, �J 0 LL g`, !i 10 f+ l //' I !1>�� l UO =O g ° 3$ I" }. w w O - W ! ��-' •I tl .7 U ,;I --2--- / V (tll" �< �� o°rc'�' 'o uw o� w i ° v `\ _� r 'I 3 I In III os �bm° „ - - l JUl�l:11 W - - i } _lr t l r•• P----------- � / ! � 7j I�, k�l �� `i I I I V _,,!/RC1 r -- _ _ v w �4 t ,•'`, ��I I7` \\ "' fi:il ! e,.� V{ — t o w . wfww owoo�a o - - o w - Sw - w-. W v . IV 'i jI W ! x W 1 I x W P �'� I>(dc•V lN-AVIurIN a�IINVgI try aul v N+yvlwlN FV IpNr,p wyyVw.irrp doutlw P andaq c IWV/pl puo ayp.b c :y Rlup p vuBlwp p yye6o, 1 M1an•.rvnr.�..r,vrnn.r.�n•rn��vrr, s�nn,a.rn ..n\v,aarrairni.n nvn\rrM1rean n\nrr•,wa—rnnnnrnnr♦rrv,ronrmi�rnN.,...mar\.., rrr�ns•ra.nn nrn�•ar rrn,nr cr..nr nn,ir.rnn r.r-,arrm.-.,.r.,mn..r-.�... E E 3 4 SITE PRECIPITATION SUMMARY i f ,JAn rm YAR APR JMr UNJ NL ALIO sQ Gcr oEt SOIL EROSION/SEDIMENTATION CONTROL OPERATION TIME SCHEDULE ACREAGE SUMMARY AVERAGENov a a LIN ACRES) "'C". 1.06 0.]9 Lw 231 3.N 6.3Y l.0/ 4.05 2.� 2.11 190 1.00 l NOTE:GMERALCONTRACTORMCWKUETMLEWITHTHEIRE9IMATMP0.0JER501ED= , TOTA.—PERTYMEA 1350 IN INOfES i i 1 j CORSTNIGTOn 6EOUNCC IAN AR A 2 PERMITTED AREA WITHIN PROPERTY 7.00 THE TOTAL AVERAGE ANNUAL RAINFALL FOR THE PROIEC'TAAFA l5:2961 INCHES TFARORARY CONSIPUCTON FSTS THE DESIGN MIN EVENT FOR THE PROJECTIS:IODYEAR RAIN EVENT 11 Y ASUR 6 PERMITTEDAREAOUTSIDE PROPERTY 2.50 E SETXYENT WNTR(2 RASH B S X TOTALPERMITTEDPROIECTAXEA I. 9.50 - TIIP t S 0tP8E RDu,1 ORAONG 6 IAWEXVIWS MEA BEFORE PROIECT(wFn LOU) ).50 i - STXW FACLHES 9 IMPERVIOUS AREA AT COM1TU'TIONIw/In LOD) 6.00 y 9E CONSTRICTION j nNISH GRAONO T PERVIOUS AREAAT COFWIETION(w/MLOD) 3.SU 5 ] F —I— BUIR10 CONGTAICRIN n LNIDSCAANG RUL STA6LTGTON S i 3 E 3 : 1)CDRTUC101 YUST RXNR£IE TJ9E——Aw%-fi PROAT—m maR TI BIP ORmCATNL L p 1 3 2)TIN SOFDUIE LAJ3T CONgOE WIM TE SSPPP YPIffiITATd 9EpDICE O k KI s piF a ' SITE SOILS SUMMARY €_ R RUNOFF COEFFICIENT SUMMARY SITE LOCATION SUMMARY SITE TOPOGRAPHY SUMMARY (SOLACE:GEOTECHNICMREPORTKBI4-0T389,BYBMLNIMERTEC,11/1X/EDIX) PRE-CONSTRUCTION CURVE NUMBER CN•92 ADDRES INTERSTATE MM AND TRUNK HIGHWAY DXX 9..Ud PARK&GOLDEN LOWESITE: APPXOXIMATELY8T9.00(EXISTINGSITE)TELEVATIONOFPROJECTSSOILTYPEAIDTEXTLA: THEGENERAL SOIL PROFILE AT THE SITECON9STEDOFASURFACELAYER 0 a VALLEY,MN OF EITHER TOPSOIL OR PAVEMENTCOMPOSEDOFBINMINOUSgt � �3 • POST-CONSTItUCTIONCUPVENUMBER: CN•BT CONCRETE.FILL WAS ENCOUNTERED BENEATHTHESURFACEIAYERAND i CENTER OF SUE: HIGHESTELEVATIONOFPROIECTSITE: APPROXIMATELY890.00(EXISTINGSTTE) EXTENDE D TO DEPTHS VARYING FROM 6T012 FEET.THE UNDERLYING fie€ NATURAL SOILS CONSISTED OF GLACIAL OUIWASH SINUS,LESSER X6'58'5.&2"N APPROXIMATELYD.20A AMOUNTS OF GLACIAL TILL CLAYS INSANM MDOCUGIONAL g Ji LATRUDE: PERCENT$LOPE VANATOIk GLACIALFLUWALSANDSANDSILM d 93'20'39.18'W LONGINOE: TOPOGRAPHY CHANGES: THE SITE WILL REMAIN RELATIVELY LEVEL AVERAGE DEPTH OFTOPSdL: THETOPSOILRIED IN FROM AlOUT0DTIWTWM(STO14 1 ; TYPICALLY VARIED IN THICKN65 FROM ABOVTOAlO3FTPT(STO INCHES} �g€E �n jE ADJACENT SURROUNDINGPROPERTES THE PROPEPtt ISADIACENT TO TWO MAIOR R01D5;INTERSTATE 3960N AVERAGE DEPTH TOGROURWJATER: GROUNDWATERWASOBSFRVED16TO28FFFTBFLONTEGR NDSURFACE 4�og �II THE NORTH,AND TRUNK HIGHWAY 100 TOTHE WEST.AOJACENTTOTHE VEGETATOTE VERY LI RLE VEGETATION IS EXISTING O SUE.SITEWASPFMOUELYA CORNESPONDKTOELEVATIOMVARYINGFPOMABWT853TO866. Bu,�3r M FAST ANDSOUTHOFTHEPROPERTYARECOFAMERCIPLBUI lI ,AND COMMERCIALDEVELOPMENTCOMISTINGOFBUMINGSMDPAWD �Eg4E L RESTAURANTS AREA.SOME PAVED AREAS STILL REMAIN TREESMD IANDSCAPED G AREMARE PROPOSED,INCREMING THEGREENMEA9GNIHCANTLY. MO1F:THE A90E IN L5 IF'ONATNN IS FOR NFNNATON DNY NO 9ROIL)NOT E USED FOR UIDNG PUe .dNSIRUCIINI gaB i �'� WSR OR F9MA,NO. - AVERAGE POPE: 2-1M SLOPES ACROSTHE 9TE o FFFFQ I Z D D o v m o iF Y L < � w r^ ° Z LLI E aJ Q LLJ z m I O F— Lu Q a U � < c/) O � ( = LL Z Lu z - � z F w J 3 ' Q Q a H J W a E a � FaZ � ZOOw cnwC9w W W 3 � Yzw E O CL U ] a ad_ Cn C J � � i a 0 5 z W s U 1 DATE 03/13/2015 PROJECT NO. 160755001 SHEET NUMBER i E a 6323 31V SNpiSN3tl IN dol AG WUN301S38 010 m, -1wyloxa SBG9r °N�n Nn CI-CI-CD :ter° S�I`dl�a �O2i1N0� Nn�...M 3NAya a svo(n SSW V10S3NNIW o i$m d- tl .�»�tl N O I VI N D W I a 3 S �,k311VA N30109\NWd SU101'1S H' N UJOHoAalwi av"] �� a m~ _ 3e S,w AB 03NDIS30 r M 'R NOISOHA SNV1d1N3W3A02idWl M a� _ Q0 tl0 NpLLV]l8]3d5'HYId SIHI 1VHl AfLLlp]AH3lpH I MLON SV 3nN3AV v0un iS3M AHVd_WZUN30 31tl75 \ � R � p 0 C 3, IiaG; � iliry'3 kiii - R5 z a �uj JJI' y 6 D F rl � C)r-. W. g •' rr. Y w v a a� w F- _J g�� gggfa b W Z Fb aCCp@@$ :fib '� 't4 E � '�v •v ' W N U Q 4o- z m— U) z F z Z F q vl V)IrW V A6 ba�� t IW y�Gy $ $ o Q M o o CL a € g s mN Vi 0a -0 � Ix xn ad � w �� 4 g baa z o Ua a� J WIrrW t (nrNIW s � � �� a W W vN Z N€ 7 �4 ?= e P o$ eve a F % kR0b a age 19% 1e �GR �.� _ `s a$ g Y lea ff �e S �� gSg bog €9a e g 3 E' s ag `�a g 4 a CRja Aga$ ab§ ps I €n : zea= ese o Y � ^a ; .e€ R p 8 I2 a£1ff4�Re1 oil "40115 1 N .a" i.° c Z. .6 - snv sa$'osa g- � � s�gxp" $ � Yb a`_ gum y i42N; 6 H E g g w s -b W 7 a b Wb.-� Oi• �sa _ N Z U 2 A�2 �u � � im �a Z jigs B s mgr o eRO 104 �� R°'s�dpfag 3 s kbW aka b�$Q �� va $� e& e ®:€ z a®�� R-i g- a£a` A s a z m m as$k 's9� 3 By Pe Z tib $ gaa 'N� ..a a ig gC s sQa orN so4aK€n$ «4s - vw;e ~�e o0 a Z 'fob o.q a E U < k� v 9 O _] Y YO 2� �� c7� �6a Ps - m m6"„w UI Yd` —•' F .,, �, maam Vii Mp 12 25 12A - / a Bads ��Qi�<E Etc y& `gs � a I�w nv =i Auuvwl I.oulw•v I:ru. ...r n. •w�c.:w:H Av.= vonw.w.o.. ----p aIv ANolslnan oM d3-1 WUN30ISM 010 IpJ'NlPN-A3.nls S{i`{-co '�Y° AQ S�1Vi3G �O2UNOO a Now ssLSY 'oN�n Nn ¢ 3WVd V svom VlOS3NNIVV o z m Ng+: Ins xsAN Jar,.=,Irmo oRc $�WN loo _ VI05NWq,� A9 �a° NOUViN3WI4EIS 'A3llVAN30109\>II:IVdsinoi'is �� 2 N r■■O. ■ y,LaI',+'+� 31Y11J3ap nY�3Wn1°ao VNnIBImWm�d SYM nod3a $,W A9°3N363° 6M ■UJ N(�(Y(V•A= W)I 'S NOISOHESNb'1d 1N3W3A02IdW1 b0 NOLLVJliIJ3d5'NV?1 AMI 1V ML A3LLIp]A®YiH 1 a 11 Sv 3f N2"voun-1S3M)WVd lt2IlN30 3WDS s _ €E a� go In E a$ =s fag € eH. AT $R a< it JIM F€a s pa Ei s "gado JOR s a km zea :E a s �s wh E_�> o m� aE ads fin� !$ NG6a�eE� 1e0ibl�a �1� X Ii 11 - lit; sg Wept z ' Eb1sand Jul@ vwi� 6�Ep� E��q ll JH Q &�� Z� tlw Fif be� "bd �6 =0 Z Aga�S -Not �b'�I WE e`��"�'S �-UP v E �E 3 es w e�'�sI b sa � a E a"a g<sg es < ATM Neltf3.E= ogl 4g i€e�4 � € @ ba' @s U �€ �b= o= bb oe q in _gig - gsa Hip 5 y w � 5:; 9 MUS h V � §l�� a� $ca a� $�g� a =�x r € a �b §b;�§Eeffia^�wa b� a: wait Z 1a`bc@ a3 w ��s e7pe a� n15 � � a�san PIP � 2." H pp a o ERyme �1 Kw E =€6€ a Rgk b� 6 Gi r 0 �$�N' HIM:�� q@�< cn Y 6 § k S F B B Qg z Or- a a 1^ < �� gg = Rb eE Oz E € FF� �a m Egg Eby b =a ' V _ o= It s dR '0 y "� ® AN 5 w G b VI Y V agg z bb pg a �' Y 9 Q o [p`: ks �b p o € `<sg ak3E ¢ p gY'< of z S^ $�€ € b 5d ebb 30 ps p <; =ao 3 g a Z. e'= a is ase z z b aB g o m€' E` 6 a sE Rig a b �a 0 .0 bb $ �� laEa.e IA 6 ,` Ib g _ " _ � n� 3� 19 Wa= � dna � � U go @$ a b� a & k asE to na H a se.=§a �Ps gig€ `sb n g nEb `' az�s $EE bg s a b ss� d Egg n � FmH � @ jig gin �s �p H. b�$§ N QE Nod N d� Nr m� nsaE o$ agNs � 7 6 s3 p `s g a b E -1 Pis pup UM Q NtIN is 1111 ElyB gs $ o � e€ bays Zn� age m ae' a$ 3 K wAE §s w W E b = b jn� a E_<�°= 3sm. w �EbE m �aP In b I m ge E p a g a" R 1,w �eg �.,bBn� a y� e g a Pig $@ wa ga G eg oda, s o s€ _€ $ gN$.G®b <=�ab 6 =sa Its = yt� F� <� �`g € z Z Iva zqa � a =Se ®=e� � � o Eked ae �IsE A '� z v b�ea £ aha E"!§s�`:g g<kn€ x wlwi{ "- og j. sb�g saE w zz s�� < � �$��ei s lax o� � goo @e <a p @ € e s o q Kik a s i w s2$g� zap aef z a g s � CAP! m; Z� � k ¢ b E`� a wz 3 �� em r e o ��a �'� An c "��s e��3� �= b� a_a a @F w fZ wg $ti; w �< too s $ o �v,a a� �wsa � ��=��e b- � ��s � ow ��$s� ua a� a E3 p; �w a ,n w,4 -p` z �< 10 a9 E< z� -on eep a$ E g $mEb g �fB` '=g o = "eass V � a� 9p�aa� SZ A 3 b e d"sY w`tl b� h C !- aga=��_ MP �6 �� wM- 10 s��iv �� s � s � �v, E w s s � pebmF � o ps s� E �ifbabx �= s s spa w bwE ha @ s gas �$�l� e; ^ s � `e € II$:�4 OR g E' �>� a b � ee a . $3 Eb `€ in: Ee�bs�F's` =�g�� 5 ss� CIO I� a s� g IS ffs "a d=g 'gig a�aF 3@w F sE CIO H s e: g`>F `s' m� "s a o p§g d biz s$g� SOH _< �Ep _ � � �� eT gA A "a bma sE"`x a 4 @: b §w$ eabE QRS c a W �JbyH3 _� n �bm ab b Ri � " ER m6 jg �gb a e= g _ $ k e� s_ p= a $ per= aa= d " Ip' atl d his; s b a$� a� �: ay a s3s ��sa' ae §^ sa E' ff b= yaw MIN" 'sad E":gEFE�$. E.,gat`Sb zgtle by b @aE � ` gees -Py P U.$ k^ ` p B d age Wi o a o 'E HIP = oQy aH WET G H lots lax zovE a g > ai p p`is � a b'sfi 1U s13 =q�i of � 9 Za R A � � � 1nn 11-6; ai Ego� 0 ag€ HUM�� §5p�s`Q :2a �� s � a a€`� w b�ss3a a =m p 0621! T9e � a sas abE$ " m F aae _ n gl@$ s sgEe` gB � asl sprig � ` Nil §Wz IN SSb< 1101;c 10", l 9 5 agb go �ab up H 666 a 3b ItlWa 3 NO gig a� gc a s '"N ani �ASH �� w � � � E e wk !� i s= a �� E ��S aH 2 � � E z w dap Ming 9a nNo g s $�nJb� kb �7 s ws9 sMa�! p�� f p a rEl�bgg5�g ^b a r oa 7 g a Ing 1PH8sdig s `yNEs-as"s vY "" g # h . wa s''��w � w=`r€ o m a £ 4g ~ M p oa jar AM k 4 sE T en ��W a k �� : � gsus` 4I E 0wb�s" : 3 s'a r11 N � _ N Y — N H • : — z _ lwaq pw wo VIWN Pl IIUVgI fro 1A W IPY 4olgaocaY D uqN VIwIN n uglol wlWAloNlro wlm+l iPaVIW lu wnaop qW w aau4�.n ou W P b'Po aIVN rol lugPµo• aylaa _o T- JP lu .14 1-41--.'1 <nun.gym. .nw•..+n ' .v.o-n.n n+nn\n.n nV e.ari^in rlA nvn\nfiran n\na.aa..nnnn•..n i\m.onvnnm\.v.r...\ .• • .inn ni..� r• yin nw .". v..i.in. i...me-.....zn.n • n.-.. •.....�nn nn .•...uiun�. n.i� �....^� •�rii. nin niir..^..�n nom..nig .x .,� +man.•.x, CJI x. z Nru�d-r�r�o°,.sxx�xp dOl xNVd S-VAO W 3�I IVIlNMISMI Ola ra93NYd J m", siW O VlOS3NNIW MMo " p IrNS11aN0 alOJ NVdSlfOl 1S � -a muI..dSAB°30630 SNVId 1N3W3A0UdW1 0WLuO K(w, wr .11u1Ae zM no x°ur3man p COLON sv3WDS J N I l S 1 X 3 3nN3AV voun-1S3M�lavd IVHIN3O o m v� o 0 w- z <o NORTH N"' a � a x —» X68 davn3 08 v1vZAv o _ o0 alo. o2 6 r s YI � U' <w6W W1$ o RD El o� v C).20 x� W �' o�z Z = z3( U F ( °°uow O oo�a < aF �I QQQ7c�M NJ7� sll : IRc� ;.;I C3JC w'pw < J�mo3 au o 1 Fm dao E < zFun o �� 1 w W U Z U N I-• -.I � � �2S UOin I < �4�i FO�ZO _ ��pyy�JJ U t.. � n w� 1 Foo c�iJ c�mo o o - ? Q n S ti ,� �� soya ?V ooaj �E�w o~— * sWWUv o�Nw �H^V, g# <. o wNw zl o�8= =oa. oZ x x "�r j3, IW ' 1 0 I � 41-41 iBUS,Hl9T I _ _ W ----- -------------------.. .. COD 1 "T — 1 m F'•1 < axxt ,x 1 Y p ;J� ` k'a Ar21 z 'I• � V) L 3 1 �rn� a� i o rc < rc�o i7b z >d 1 �o z-9 , Z I }fib Zw F� a i ��ys�yN� $ >Z b zpa <v� m W m � < L zyl -r•1 ■ ,}^. 52 � V � afs Z� n oP Q� <R 6 m �p U 1g§ ( OaQQ ri m l� ► "�v7 1 :�.I.. 9g g moo <y 3 g�3 3 �` g *9p Bb~ ob a < g 1 x € 8 m uuFM. o � F $ B It � pN; W_��' R�� (nj>� �S'G ob¢y" ��e I�.h LL ro sFr;iI7{ o m ;�' W b i rcn� m c4b�' j bm�� of ` z o mz z <„ �o�n� yes 1 ��=m �� < �e. 7 �� Z rcpbb<: ozzl 4 � oZR zn - L� i�= 12 �6z zoo o sB z 2 mcW w�(r5 Pi8 < 'o $ 6 � �a so t�$a� w'm is<a f'iPi w'm B X. X i X i X.-X-� I..._t..�__ N X 1%-X r i -- >, 'r f,L,�,'s.+., tR + '•:. s F. i o �' k' Ru < < o Hl o z 5 '�' z b o < � : � x > > z n '1j7 � W 9 R� I vl a < tTs u n` a hl W ti rS a o b u > > m � . a 12� i - 17 - LLI 3 a a S Sa S S 8 S 8 S S S SSS 8 5 8 8 o ■ .1;7 rc W Q� 8 o b'N a u o0 I I - 1! I` ® X 1 s o �b �nga 0 o g o o W I Fa wwtmrd a,P wnP4Wa�c�,.1�.�.�vw 1u.W�+w ra w.+wN+�.�+1 r�.10 w.0 s•oaa w�A W W N)WP WP wP1rtl alPb.N N/NP YTWM N yPM�N luPxnM4 iP u'Y��Y Piuw�..ulPM Pio tHbim WI au,.w.ew o�.w.�Pw Mut ]iv0 sNo,sN3tl 'aN d31 AB 03N73F0 N V d i` 1O/\V WINBOIS31l Ola n]�MtlSN A3rxx CSW 'ON'JN Nn • s:�:�o gra s�ry VlOS3NNIW o Z g Tm O �susc x„iinr�„ 3N4Vd'0 SYJIII o� w rios3xwn so AB wvuo 1N W�/�b�d '8 �A311VA N30100\XdVd SM01'1S N uJ0H ((Aajwi� �Y15 3 LL Jo SNVI 3H Y30M Y33. YN0651 d. Q M W Z .,.�//�� o3x3Jll AYIO Y nr 1YMl ONY IDISNmdnS siry 0:o w 103Y10 An mOXfl!p 3N AB mwmud SYY 1YOa3lI A9 03N01530 v SNVId 1N3W3A02idWl �\O O W tl�xour�ma •N a S Nt ArN Ym�AmmN CD 031ON Sv 31 I�0 O d 13 3�1 S anN3AV voun-1S3M>wvd IVNIN30 31vDs O; LIDO; Lo: Off; Lf); O Ln w w : O' O): rn: Qe/: QV' r" 2 U Z N ..................:................ �vyy�� y^� /yam /�/� /y� .•1 F F 0-8 0 Z .............. ..............OV..............YV�..............YYy:..............yy�..............QxJ...,..........M:..........•........ 3b s of GO 0, �'/ NORTH N N �L,u z, ia ...................................... ' .......... L. ....... ................... ............. ..........,.. .... _o ro;"'�� , Uta7�oa NW v, WuS,W Q - i ..............i.... ............1 ...... i ' ...................i ............ .a =ooZ 1 29 lIIIIHS 13S oab�9 LIIHS ]ISoo �m- 00+6 'd1S INI�HDiVA oz 00+6 'd1S 3MHDiVn O Q I t iq I I R I{ --.-..� ........... ............. ............. : :' E ,..:... ..,j.,L..................:...................i....,..............i...................i..............,.... \�\ B M / ina ..................i...................i...................i...................i........... �.. ............. ............. ..... ; LO LOFL8B I 00'9i+B:Nd: I 00 an.. z rc ..................i................ ,............ ..•.. .. .........L....•i...,. ;... a3a ........... ............. ............. ............. ............. N a .�.i 10.0' 24.0' 24.0 t I 1 d# It 8 I I s O i - f i ze.o' w II 00 a. 2s.o' III i -- I ...................i............... ............ ......... .... ... ` Li i Iz IIII .....I.....:.............:.....I ...... ..,.......... ................i................ ................... ........�.... o Ia tb l Q9'L86 0:688 i ............ ........ ............. 71 / `u w F Ia / f8'9Z+L 'id ..................i,................,.i..........,........i................ ..... ....., ...,.. .... (• .1 : : ........ ............ .... I I , boa 1:. gig s ......... ............. ............. ............. .... au aee...............................:...................`. I O m�ww f� I I ow w O� ge Z F-wo�f o: U wLLio xco o - /! l � I zaoo e U ouww of �a'. I I u SS'89B 0�� i =w uo i I ............. ............. ............ Lllii�< �: ..i... .. i ► =� §' 1 :...................:...................:................ ..'#........... ............. ........... ........ .............. " - u-gS I„ • wo Zq n � j 9'68B............................ ............ ............. ............. ...:... ...:�.... ..i... yy I ...i... �... Td ..................i...................:...................:...................:' ..........t..... ........... ............. ............. ............. N J 48 4 ........... b �Sc ............... m. .. ot 98 l oo.X{$ '• Go M69 U') 7. .. .. ..................:...................f...................:........... 1:. ................ ;.� / �no� / i �' ..................i...................i........ i � 5 S� ............. 77 0 --- i 1 I1 L969B.. ......... i Y $3 > 1..... ........ ............. ............. .....�.... Sox ■ LO 1 Q8 l 'i of +rc 1 I ! I: ..............................s.................. i...................s................ ............. ......... ` I I Lr) 90'086 LI7 LF'1 ...................:...................i..................' N k.' fel i'� iii 1 II ..................i............,....................,, ............ ........... i b•at+t �d II I / L'I III { I i i O Q$� r s a �t iil I zG�i.... 00'OO+Y::Nd ; ............. ............. .... C>: O LO O Ln' Oi Ln' O; rn00 ; rn: Op OD oD; n n; co .a•w:•u•w• x..N�c.,wn.:euuoai uoa v x.•r ox,c.,wY<o.oaaovo• ,.a.,aw• ^•Y�••,.a.,d. wrv•,w>�a v m ew..a.•a,ry Ax•'•row:w n'roN,M w rv•wyy r w.,8..en.e o w.e..•: Q m� U �0» meq• �°. _ — Y 3.D 16N'y N dD, Nd1d 1f10J1`d1 WUNMISMI010 LO I �»v-icv:y,pw C9L9p bx 7n Nn CI-Ct-CD `�yD Ag 03X331q W sp xx,py. 3wva seam V1OS3NNIIN o z$ �— vios3xx,n S„” AD �aD 1N W /�b�d '8 IIJOH(<c/�3�U 11� 'A3-nVA N3oloo\)laud slnol-is �Y1133a DLLn—,w 3�A.0—d SVM i oe a s,w A9 D3ms30 o r F M xD N9LLV�If1�3d5 NVId SIN11VHl AfLLy33 A®y3N 1 ORON SV3,VD9 31 I J O�d 13 3 2:15 3nN3AV V�d-iom MIVd Va.1N30 a w �< O LO O: to O Lo 0: Lot O: Off: O: 00; 00 �: f\; tD ..............p1):..............GD:..............Op,..............pp,..............Go; ,..............pp,..............pp,.............. pp,................... � rcrc o � •��og� NORTH N`" O� QO„-)S U . ........... ............. ............. ........ Va� ........:................... _ ..................:...................:...................:...................:..... ...1... 6oF= :��v x< ...................i....... ... W Z--�9 1IIHS ]IS O 00+ L NI�HOWz O szti'osa.............................. ............. ............. .......... { .... -F lil ag p+� .E....................... r7 lil S''a o i � E o ill ; Ei...................i..............., -_—_ J, 99 NO ............. ............. T. r arc i i li ue o ............. I+o Ili $ 1' Fa l i I� VIN O III �� ! 91`L88 ........... t.i...................i,............... ........+,... ... {... rc g 9.988 d ... !II � 1 I i h7 III 1 r LU1;1 ............. ........ i ............. ............. ............. ZLu iji I Hg m { ii i .... U L!7 .. F—III •.` I ;.-1 �S':L88 E ' I N 6'888 I ar8 !ll i� i................ .......... ..........1.................., !II i 97z'6r+zL ad 1{ ....., jj O �FNF--IOC 1 rn III `$� _ I i 0 Z6`la........... ........, ............ ............. N.... ... ... I + "< £188 ... ....... .... ; E y I ! I Do 8 +g Z ? 1 :'• W i ......O ....... Z Q... i LO s J YL£zsa ? .d I !1D LJ ............i........................ d ......... ... ....i................ ............. ........... .. ... LLJ atl n 3 r ��• N��ee.z' Q = '�o G U) -- QCL5...................:.......................................:.............. I............................... s I W LW Z ea9a1: 9a 1 O ( V) J I + i 8 80£88. .........................:..:....... I ......... 133UIS H19T M ? i. 1 6^ e f B N a i... a � I «�t; I I .............e...a..�i.ae .........i..,................i...........,.... I ............. . ................... 2 29.0' ..... : ' �f •.. 1 e . 5•€aa + . 7 /J 18 i i i ........... ............. ....... ............ ............. ............................... . ..................i...................i...................i..... ....i.... I / 5a 't '..................i...................i...................i..................:i. { ....... ............ ................i...................i............... / y 6.0• .7 ze.o' lo.o' 24.0' ♦. .e.d ;lI ; 1 a Li ag.............:...................i...................L..................i.i.......,..... i...,......,......,.i....,....................,.......,, .......+... I 8 0 .I o ' ............ 1 i - `.�....................... 8�hnx LI lot, LULL+6 -Ld ..................................:................... `................... I F.................ij......................... ....... _ Ln g S $ 8a O 6t88 ! + W 5� :� a^$ ` E rwoy mak'= aLn� �8 +g • �avt ..................i................ ..,.............i...................:.............. .j ............. ................i...................:........ W I �O�ZS I•. • m,",o: i i i i N 09m> 3 Q'o�rco '"� 1 II ZJ i too IE i i i Hwe:'.f o: gL'Lz+6�d £, IL UJN-ma ..................i...................i................ ............, ......... ( i...............,...i................ ................i..:.. xo Lu QZ5c4� w F III �Lu pF� i ? I: . .5...'. 8...a...............i...................:.. O QuDo-si Z +U . ....... ............. 1 ............... . ........... . ....... Oo a 0) Hw�aa w� Qw==o ZLxU I= , = fZ : ODi........:.....Oiii..............LOopi 0: OI.i mOV�9 1]13HS ]]IS Op.............. .............. OpOppco 00+6 'd1S n>J ................... INIIHO1dW 'pVi'wppppary pwo x�N-ApIWN%AlI0p91 1nuvNa ap iloY'eul'aaieiaway puo wax-AalwiN Fo uoxoieove pue uo,ioziioytn6 uaiii+t�vll�ivawnaov qyl w cugp,xdedup p e pnwy•ppoCad auw i,ya,yn qi iliryp pw wpWrG iixaada syI iey Apq;ppwiy p,byx/io yvpuwlpy yr b'epwy pyuwa.A puBpap pio ndpiuoa ayi y,ia�a:,ia6ot iwwmoe•i:.i Q m U 0 W u- S — Y azYo SNDISN3tl 'oN d7, Nb'�d lflOJlb�� lVI1N3aIS3a Ola Jn -tato 3xow SSLSY ON NX SI-ShCD �ro A9 Q3NJ3HJ blOS3NNIW w K va'ss 'v1LL53NN1n 10 O ZO � uN. ®rY tea,xx 3rurd sr0m s�W A6 wwrNo CN 1N D IN 3nbd � 'Jl3l1VA N34109\)lWd SIn01'1S o M UJO K/Ca t l!I �Yi i]wiJJ n moon uo 3X A91 p3wd.N.—'IVpd3N S,W A9�3NJI530 M w Z H< tl0 NOLLYJWJ3e5'NY d SIX lYH AfLLC]AH H M I 3�1 J O8 d 13 3 2:1 S 3nN3"VDIM 11S3M MHVd lVUIN30 0310N Stl 31V75 mpF o u N w y 3 W C> N J U Z w N ............. to a4ap�CN'<Zou�� zO�cZ-]o N� FpF W'��...•QQgQql it UUJ,tj ma NQQQ JNIJi FQ�ZV Fit ZO ..................:. ...........,. ............, .,........... ........... a N ..................:..... -o��Q o gU'-z ¢ U N z LLJ � oNy,w al U~wzQ off.- rc i i .'• i i i w ' <N�O oQw ..................i......:...,..... ............. ............. ............. ............. ............. :... ..;... w- az w .... Z a o=FoU - _ Www w w -0:W `Wa° mNwp � ............ oo:-o oz Cq),2 x� LLQ°�So Z. w ; i 0��3� ()woody p•� Www ox owoOQ r w} i F'muz am w z s z ..................:...................i...............,...i........,....... ........,.... ......... :... W�wo3 i ao Q ..................i...................i...................i..........................................................i...................i.... N ..................:...................i..................,i...................i...................i...................i...................................... ,........... ............. ............. ........,.... ..........,.. ............. ............. ............ o i -_B - -_ ..................: . ... 0: Los0Lo` 0' L0; L �S 68 Os �E O: 00 00 Il1�I (D: dm nri � X a oo..� ..................i.....,.............i...,.• ............ �� CNVA31noo vivzkvm +�. ...................i................ `s a Oils to a co; °°...................ao ao oo: oo ...........0 Lo 8b -' ..................i..................•:........................,.............i...................i................ n i L9'LCB.`g .. .............. ........... i.... :Nd LBLL+'13 rcv�i N•N� I N Ll N 10 _. —T. �ho �+` � �a 1 O <+ wn� 06'LLB I O 5� � � I ag I _,.1 s spa............................. �. ... .. ............ ............ ......... i . :.... ... _ ....1 I� .......... ............. ............ ... ... ........ ..... N� I ££'BLS 8 j Lo 1:Vq� I 6'BLB { tD $S8 ' z +, 604.7 240o 10.0' 24.0' .z 6.0' :......................................5................ ..... ...`:...... i .-- .... i ......... ............. ........... A i ! I Ih :...................i.... ' k w I 1,% r- 9L.`BLB........ O ... ...i... ._...... ;... 0.61g z 39.7* 45.7' i CD i w m I .....................................:........................................................ - 1 o ..................................................... ..... 1� BI!BL9 i i .......... ............. ......... ............. 29.0' z9.o' .......Lr).... -{- �� j ...... 5-6 4LL � O<t.. mO illlli ..................................................... ............. ........... .......... g ji L9,'6L8 i i i ........,.f ................ i O 3 -_ ..................t...................1................ ............. ... ... i.................:................ ................t................ ......... .. ... _. It .................t...................1...................t......... ... a.... ... ............. ... 91 co:Dug1 L 60 foo c '• ` ............... ............. I .,.....,... ............. .......�., }}joj yqq FFnn ......................... .. ....s r NY.1' IN Z~O 1 LR .. '..................t..... N :I 8 :...................:........................ :....,. l-K9 MHS ]IS z ;oae...............................i.................... .. I o 6'6L8 I -................................. ........+.... ;... 00+-V L b1S 3NI�HOldA O O O' ao:. 00: •..:ou..cr xu N.:LLIIIIxXI IxuV11..0 Y.tepo..r Pxn ou.c.�w:h F4 ua .nro m.ewr Pu N..�Y 1.ae.N xaw 11 4.:v.+N*N1 Lb w U n.oe..o nvo v.no=N. v.mo.:novir:ww..w ml v..ovoln... C;7Ljl d..Nt�w arv:x.oxn •i wl m '--4W .ev W U- i Q 8 {6 t ' a 3 a a g � � 5 � E 8 ` g C La p� Y3� T Ea EXIST. EXIST. PROP. D/U 3 ; R/W I R/W EASEMENT 39.67' 39.67' i a g $s F K g• p•_q' 12' 1 12' 1 1 12' 12' a I •x ,x I a I a . 0 u, a'�5 ei m RO J UTICA AVENUE E`W` ' INSET 8 e� 3. 'S 4" CONCRETE INSET A INSET B q PROFILE GRADE INSET A .ao� o 8 SIDEWALK s„ 4" AGGREGATE UTICA AVENUE INSET G gWgo BASE INSET G STA. 8+39 TO END a SCALE: 1" = 5' N m m a EXIST. EXIST. PROP. O/U i R/W R/WEASEMENT U) 39.67' 39.67' —1 7 Q L p VARIES 12' 12' 12' 12' U p_ I F— p I 4% 4% F zs zX u ' ` � ! V 7x i i I I Ill \ I co i s UTICA AVENUE INSET B EXISTING INSET A C{PROFlLE GRADE CONCRETE INSET C INSET B INSET A W j SIDEWALK UTICA AVENUE INSET C STA. 4+95 TO STA. 8+39 w SCALE: 1" = 5' a �ao11-- z ~Z00o _ CONCRETE CURB do GUTTER CONCRETE CURB k GUTTER (n�JJ C9 i i 2" OF MNOOT SPEC 2350 BITUMINOUS TYPE 8618 (TIP–OUT) TYPE 8618 LLI� W W i WEARING COURSE MVWE4503513 BRICK PAVER MEDIAN Y Z Ir 7 MACK COATC. 2357 w d.m J E 2z Q _ (L co o 2" OF MNDOT SPEC 2350 BITUMINOUS _ II TOPSOIL J BASE COURSE MVNW350358 _ 512" MNDOT SPEC 3138 CLASS 5 ISI 5:1 SLOPE J AGGREGATE BASE COURSE Z —TTT—TTS—TTT—T7T�T7 12" MNDOT CLASS 5 W - �=111=�111=111=111=111�� III—III—III—III __ .............. ��'�� APPROVED SUBGRADE AGGREGATE BASE �_�"""" V 1T=I I I—III—I —I I I=I -I —i TI 03/DATE2015 12"MNOOT CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE PROJECT NO. - —I APPROVED COMPACTED SUBGRADE APPROVED COMPACTED SUBGRADE 160755001 INSET A INSET B INSET C SHEET NUMBER 6343 SNOISN3tl .„ dOl IVIIN3aIS3N Old oP „„ sL�{�o :pro ABm��3N� 3�1AO�Id '8 NV�d V10S3NNIW o =g p .yu PL•m.•s 3NArd.�swum Pa;tus•aa arr usoPn us N SSW AG NMrua A311VA N30100\NLIVd SIf101'iS L-d' L,, .�2 z M UJOH(«/��UII� Gyle3Hp�9-�"aAGm„ „;- dam S,WAB03NOE30 �I�M�S WPIOlS SNVId1N3W3A02idWl Cfl 031ON SV 3f1N3AV V011fl-1S3M llaVd 1b211N3O a 31rD5 0 O O � 00 O [o O C" 00 00 00 00 DO z NORTH N + OD o �o MIVMino9 vivzAvM = I 171 \. , O 7 Doom irn� z cm.7Nwm rmn o om �m m 4 / w ' _ 10 — w I a 0 �}/ O EWS O O r- // � -•t;:. I �o \ ria ��n°° I - ..,. �,/) 8 www O I I m ^ 58'6L8 1'088 + S (N) 9l'D B 1f10 31 (3) 9l OLP NI 31 I 0." an o 0 o m o- m �t 1 e jW lL"088 38 I 7n w a m vi a P. be 1 ,SS'1Z 'Sl' £+£t Nis 1l£ HN z z I W P, t z_ O -- 4 I � I� it ry I ptLS"O9B 0 Z I I M vv v Lu } o ! M I K Z"188 i �I ! j pp'^mrom I ng r .�.. ' Z QMN�rn I 0 1 I �! t I m�ww P I h� � I _ O 8� 9L'6£+ L •Ids o°i• 9Z'l68 0 c I Y I �� I a ro 6189 + I ( I . r� 5: 01Kz Z " 'moo¢ wary 0a m�w m U'w U tY an0 W 133a1S H19T M I'� �waz N wo O 89,Z98 0 -_- .... ¢ oco O IN'R O wZ^� r h I N mom "n rs�rra/ ,�\�\�\ eP� 1 'i cmiN� wm 1 a O F O Z O /. 8 , il N w® 9Z'1913 C) m(aji'pv �W d, I rnaw� I �H 1 �z I v{rr w w Z. wZ a�Eo< W z �� 14}, i I 0 o d o Z l i d,.... - ., I 1S'SBB 0 �ON) 99'08 im 3 + P (S) 99'038 NI 31 1 z g a Cn R (M) W038 NI 31 / N� m d �m £'988 321 Ir w� 0£ HWBO I z m I �y�� z PH i O Gras 0 8 0 w w 5 Ij VLBB + w5 0 00 a p � o $ :awn w� � �, aww I r <�ao FFN< O 6113ea O �oNog �� i ' £�: .+ I' �w I Z'1399 + Q Oho of �I.t 'r aU 1 w �3oaw L /� 1-I\I t• IL 1 a Z� IT No O�0ow �s /I� j1, I '1 - n (N) E'489 1(1 31 o 9 '998 3i1 1 9 Q i o o a ° '� L z 21,Z4'8 S1'SO+9 1S I O f-w w a m I... 8 6S'6B8 O F- H.....�y .. ' I 6'9139 + J '03 au 13 9 - I F ( a m LD'062 O N _ 1// LO z w I I I ^ w I I ^ '44 O 16 Qlf4 Od O 0 0 01 O6B + O 0) 00 O A I; (7) 0) 00 00 00 00 SPI yPwPP«v yY.PH�PIWM Pl R11W41 lnwPM K IPY oy'V I wM Y VNHNIWII Rir i.pw'<A. m'ilM.V WIM iYw,yA 4W w ou9M +.VY w«.y v.Prm.w N YIY q1 i,PIP We..Pare yr,.a.a<!AW VTWy w'«M,«w>«un9.M iP«',wwV Pi«wM mL.r vY MPuw wL ru.wa.a.�tiwyrcAP.ru 6mp'BBBB-311.A06d ONV NV-ld 83M3S NUDiS-O8Z9\a315-1)O\63aaysu P ld\aVO\u61Pao C\Pua >Ip\A301 OMl\:JI wdlg;W4 0 SLOZ SBL 4a1oW 311JOUd ONV M/1d:4-AP1 and ANVNIM13ad -aN3 1S3M;laS 3aayS -118'u---PI-MAB Pa31Pld ID.daminant mqI..I.de--I.and daaldna pa 1.NraM,n a MMnaMeN of sande,,Y FlandN edr b ON,WIWI pnaer..d dYnl b WIN R-1-1&-of and Wp rdlene a 1Ma dommanl a11Na,1 I-a,Mesetlm ad adgbtblco XY N1nNrrMem ad Aradat�Fc,A/I a eXNaut ItlMnr m NYn�ry-lien vd AreHatw,�I.c n a) 00 (.n 0 a 0 = O O O O = (A v O u r, c7v O Q I Dl�il O mcZi ON ®N m + 886.7 rn o CBMH 30 --q+ 880.8 MH309O Q 886.46 I RTA:886.38+,5.85. 28.67' LT O Q 879.96 I o A TA: 14+29. 29.00' LT Q Q ,tiv E 879.81 � IE OUT 81.48 (E) n .-� I OUT 871,08 (E) n oN OJ r N I STA: 8+,5.55, 28.42' RT ^; TA: 14+29..31, 27.49' RT :5 F; v'� RE 886.3 Z cpJ o E 879.89 W o IE IN 880.91 (W) O �v I IN 869.7 (S) p Co m + „ � IE IN B 0.66 (S) N .+ 2 I IN 870.5 (W) 00 A Q DO Q m, Q 00 OD 00 (0 On 4 00 cD O O O O O U1 O O O O 00 00 00 w 00 OD 00 to co O) -4 00 co O) -4 00 cD O O O O O U1 O O O O z m W W DO C �1C3 A < O� p O go go O mN rn + 878.2 m n C8 H 11 Q + 884.0 + 1 CBMH 306 O 0 29.877.39 STA: 1 +91.81. 0'LT Q 882.95 m v STA: 0+68.62, 219.67' LT O RE 87 .39 M O ®�; 1 RE 88 80 IE OU 871.54 ( ) X y m o I IE O T 878.59 NE) ofa o 11 H� D I = m r N A Z ni STA: 1 +91.73, 27.1 IV RT RE 87 33 W 1^A z= ® CBMH 5 N IE IN 68.72 (S) STA: 1'+01.47. 29.(0' RT j m ®� 26 O 1 IE 1RE�2 77.92 S + m o� IE IN 70.97 (W + 882.5 ( ) x p u; O A� $ IE OUT 877.17 ( ) (� N r00 00 9 /00 x/0'^0 V m f�fl(ACA O 1 -4 00 (D m N N N I O O O O X10+ + 00 Eo p 00 - rn 00 c0 O CJ1 O O O O 0 A M 00 00 00 00 co X 00 00 00 00 LTI 0 0 00 0 Z (3) V co c0 O O O O O O C3 Z -{ + 880.5 -� O O Q 880.5 O + 881.2 (7 Q G M 314 STA: 13+3 .15, 24.55' T N O ®^' 0 p� RE 880.71 -� M m I IE IN 870 16 (S) C $o ® ; g _ N ^�-u a 2x ' IE OUT 8-,0.16 (N) mo k O Q + 881.2 O 0 881'42 1® 307 STA: 12+15.33, 27.49' RT O RE 881.19 IE IN 870.61 (S) 00) v 0 0 IE IN 870.61 (W) O O O O � N mz0n + Zo =o Q �m�m� n O M NN00 00 00 00 OD OD OD 00m --10 m _E 1 -40 a O O O c0 cn O O O O VOEMK W NZNDI AM r0 W 001 rZ O oo�mOn .+ -i N Z 881.7 O m Q 881.76 1 0 STA: 114 2.97, 27.91 RT RE 881.5 IE IN 8 D 1.15 (E) 0 IE OUT 71.15 (N) ®N a o2 j DQDO nA am�m� Fn Fn ma�mzf^0 COD mZ ;moo 0 N a:r 1;990 Nw pW '2 oymo Z p 8 N op zye m o > ,_> f" �Pa=C) =m oa==o em �5"0 OD 00 00� 00 0 m m 0) -I OD co ogg 0 O O O a° A � !e SCALE N o CENTRAL PARK WEST-UTICA AVENUE AS NOTED = v i pWT ASPM NAT By PLAN.SP.-AlON OR ■ _ o DEsaED ar wPmMSWASM AMD NAT By A ON OIA.V�N£XSEO RECT �� ``Horn wo IMPROVEMENT PLANS STORM SEWER MLS M-S...EXOFLER UNDrN THE LAMS OF Nff STA E SRV■ of ry C�� W W D 0,NNNESOTA. L.0� F4 ST.LOUIS PARK\GOLDEN VALLEY, DRANK BY N MINNESOTA LATERALS MLs mm U Z hj WCAS G PAITRE ar.RAIL IN snd m O O CHECKED BY GATE: U3-13-15 NN UC NO. 07B5 Rte'� lfn p f " DLC RESIDENTIAL LcP � Nn. -SIONS E 3.Ya SNOISN3tl Ory dGl '1 IN3aIS3a Ola GDLp1 'PN d'Nn 9l-fl-CO YLL s,w AS 03)03N0 �-I I ��d blOS3NNIW o z o O N TY.•,. aura ro Srom o AD NrraD 'A311VA N30100\)1Wd SMOI'IS `' u.rOH((<Ialwr� 3 v11.-APN�30NA�w 3nIVU =w: a S,W Aa D3ro�D '8 NV �d ill I I 1 f l SNY1d AWBAOIddW1 a ■ tl0 NPLLY�IL�3N5'NYId SINI 1YHl AlLLa3p A93H3N CD 031ON Sy 3nN3AV voun-1S3M)4NVd IVNIN30 o a`°N 3T'OS o opp55 W 00 00 h T co co W W <o Zdie5q__ 9Z NOS OAd.00 WO99'JAO AN e�� t33 0Ad.D ZL'fBBNI AN at 0911 -M A o S9'LL9rvpJ I - v 1NCZ'LI'LD'GZ+LL :VLS Hry LL VIO 9 {Q 90l H7 ( O oz i 1 I Ib I I 10 �- CDwG51z gQ2 N e'6L8 O UJ ;, II blot HL i + --_j I I I a O iYU 19 6L8 9'6L@ + gjg F L•- r <t aryl� ,�bl �1S I tt ;6 sz Wow I M a 7n $ 9Z NDS 0A .00*9'099 110 AM i p VCHOS d.D LST9B NI ANI ( �1 3 S In BL NOS d.Of*9'099 M ANI Y2S � � F$ 1 'LI'DB'Be+f Y15 I j u I �1-J Ol Hry 1 oq„ 4'088 + = I 2=� ts� _ r iV Y �c � W o 18ti dz < I 9 'tvb N,`a� 4u'I Z � �1 ;a:s ' 6 I O z w I 9l'lBB + 3 QN "3 Z IBB � i Q F� I �d �O I as I 9 r j tl I Z61913 SS: $ s'lae N NOS OAd AC C'099 :1110 At I d30 AafIB,S' o nHbi I Z NOS OAd 0 CB'998 :M At I Z a05 O.1d.0 SC :M At 1 1 m —GAS GA G Lz 18001 Hry No 3s d0a rw V BOTH O I N r ! o O I r vol O s�;: i �� s9•*e6 O �l ii y�Sr.' 9Z NOS OA ,OC 8L'099 :1 ANI 'd qq=qqLr;�� p=,5 9ZHUS'Ad_6 WCOR L_j 7 9L a05 d,0f el'09B 1 AN •,� R I 9S'SB :IIIN i�l HN NOLLO3S Z LZYJS O pNN �a923 I Za'BBB Q I Z'96@ + W UZID N � � W I 2�g n> ss ! 4 4N1 aO�zo � Q �b� Z. f �` zJ o J or - m a H F NaNza k ..I I. _ I ��' �G� H VL99 + �UmoF ��3 * III I IO 99 Lq I RF co�o< 2� <: n4jl Rica i 6 IL) � j I I 88 n z W �C5 �2�oz � ��''• ��I�I IIS � y j � � CL 0 m T^-' 916@6 O a 0 L 1 I i Z'BBB + � � z � o� e�o I o o �tEag /16 �A �a 411 - o$ i5 i p�r� 6 , I � �$ a a� g �u ° og �� r I ^ _ ^ bROo I a m� O 1-o $�q�a '6 U-889 O SY N 5 1 aFo >z z. 1 b 6'696 + z �- mrczi>z i rc 00+0 0., a��e w� � I .-�a�m• 1 g � dW w I y L9'628 O i �Y�#; L-699 + ?�i > - PI d o I a `o ISO in Ow�wir oo L `� ylpsb`'32 11' I. t: _ �a �i.� �^ 's b I n oN �u F'B ..s•r M' > ZEN �� ; 'SISS o O avow �z o l o = U w 000"w G: O � 3 ?^� �m P I im O 00 W h�'o3 < I-J Q � (Op t!7 O co co co 00 00 7ul•PPWPo�Y Ile PeM�PIWN W(n/OOII{OaMP N IPM ay yFOWPr'W W �MWNiiO�qMl o; voNPA<gm Ygllr•l�PY1M 1w—Rw w w*pu+del Pw A PW woG„tl�IM�Pb YN M FnP INWM PI'oM/Y N>uPWtlM4 lop'4��V P1w•wM P�81WP Plo qW'�w K 4N�wWP6q'iYPYIrvaV qVl 8MP'BBB9 -31LiONd ONV NVId Alllll11-OBL9\a}IS-Jl0\alae yeuold\QyO\u6!ea0 C\pua Ia L0099L09L\1-J1--plseu�1P\A301-3MiVX wdZZ:9*:*0 9LOZ 'BL 4—N 31130Nd V NVId A1I11111:inulol 00d ANVNINI13Nd- ON3 153M�1a5 lea yS p.11.1d olu6'uowapurly,;( D SNDISN3tl cx d0_1 IVIIN301S321010 .ay..-.o>.w■ow,� s9cw 3w rd oxsr°ml sl so ova A9 mWJ3H7 J VIOUNNIW o z tuw 'HlAI•n SlW 3'1 I J O�d N O vioslxxlN 10 Ae gra° 'A3llVA N30100\)IUVd sinoi us W ' UJOH<�(/ajWj ""A 31 n min A win mwm °ud s oeiu Ae mnom° '8 N b'-1 d Ai I�u f l o M U z SNVId 1N3MA02ldWl W tl0 NgIVPlL03d5'NYId AHl 1VHL A3—'ww I a ON Sr 3nNg"voun-imm)IaVd lVNIN30 31r05 m W r- (D Lo o 00 00 CIO 00 s $° NLo 0 n Y + 9 NGS 31d OCE V099 :111D ANI FF zi OAd 9 ZLT :NI ANI(ON SIX3)0Ad,01!SCOW •NI ANI O ss LLa :ANI t w h w= D su l0.9+u :riS 55"LLB O 8'LLS + to O O� ao m� I,—m .s o. Uw°�� r� Q O O O O ~xe'O oN z Cn co CO � O LL: J Q 0c) 00 00 00 (� U g°w w w $� I) OOooa J�m'°3 O O O O In Q Go 00 00 00 0 C� 0 W + n d V Z V N a g$ tiO o O Om ry'lp yJ FQ NZµ N V o Il9.9BN ANI ~� v H m (/1 •o a;MIN O Q o:< --- --- woes O w z,, �— 801 HW Z'OBB + aN¢oa O Q zW o¢~—i 0=~oz ~ 0 (0 In om Q 00 00 O 00 OO cn 00 00 00 00 00 0 N O a sae + + ' II a t m I IIra 5C999unD At I ea f6'999 W A I I b cn LZ*M Th I Fn s c3 l H LZZBS + YO ['ZSB Q $ LL Q o i Z V ~ O 00 co t!') z ! ! I � z00 00 00 U Q ti cn J I I � • t � � I I u; �. �o O O O O a00 OD 000 „ OCD m 0 lq_ a �. 01'09 :1110 ANI `S i L_--_----�"'at Z9'99*NI ANI L'us 899 I:nlal 7i o O 95'588 O Q O 00 CD �o CD U) Ir z 00 00 00 00 00 I iii . I I Q li I (n i O O O O to O Co Lr) 00 00 00 00 L I` it II O �P m ho Ig *a I + N — I o S I S (dki)Hl a"ane.5'L + � I wS I � O O -z sv0 _ + b S N NOP — �—�-- ils> 1 O 8Z'fiSS O O � J O O 0 O Ln YJun NOS1Nr1 I \\. �\ . 0) 00 I�- (p Lo ONINH03DIN3A 103°ISMO I \ — 00 Co 00 00 00 031rJ013H013H-31OHNV.11V 4 \ ---_ a01:)va.<N000iia3iv M '�xl'�WP�r Ywo x<I3.J IWN W<NP41 1P' IAV W No'1'+4 wPP�'Iwo woN�IWM t0�I1c3mVe iwe Va11�wNm V�NW)1o'IIM iw•ulnoW 9N w oW��COMW�w/o wn.L•r.ax.H a 31'AIW+w lw•IP V'M�b ayla4�q wy Alio W W4 A YaN�w 3'wu�WM wow'N�/V Plw•wM�lelwp VIO gCo'm wp ql�sxwsw yv.Wmev iYl SMP'B9B9—31130Hd ONv Nvld ALIILLn—OBZ9\ally—J)O\cleaya up ld\Ov0\u61sa0£\pw I$D*100SGL091\IoljueplsRJ alP\A3UF0ML\:N wd6£;94:;0 910Z '9l Lp—M S31130ad A1n11n:jna(j and Aav NIN113ad — ON3 1S3M:I-S I—S 0116'uowepiryA.lB Paltold 3Lb° SNDISIA3tl aN 'ON n vd3-1 AS 03)133H3 VIN301 MI 010 BBLµ 3LYd O SV,m `YUG VlOS3NNIW N z o DW o SAs Nd d JNdl�:US 'MA3llVA N3f° UJOH(g ap!)i �bA iJ3am°n"Emn�°u°°in" M-Nd SM ioe y SlW 'R 3 9 V N E I S ❑ ¢oo w AS 03NDIUO SNVId 1NWBACINdWl � "°"°u"'"".'" b" "u°'".°"' a3LON Sv 3f1N3AV V011fl-1S3M N21Vd lValN30 o a 31VDS LL�9 ll]�]HS ]-�S w OO+OL 'ViS 3NI�HOIVA z Qo (1sOd NOis) t No �--► PARKING Mlavd �-► ON R7-18-tz•xia• v v � (SIGN POST) I get s BL'LLf6 4d 111 0�� lir--- _ W N w 8 (9CN P0+"11 gaoa" �w „1 z L10 p 0 ZEN ° V. N 'I 00oow rs I I U w0ww 0 Z.00ooa 0 ILLI V z F I --- Z 1 1-O AZO I�•iZ0 70.5 J N w 0 vJ�m< Lu -_— FQOIza aW o< Iii <It 01 Iti z W Boz —— l I 1 11 0=10 I ! �OZm _ wI ¢o 41 a "s 10.5 I 1 i �^ 1' ! I I I, II I 'Id co I I I I > A LU l.• I "� t0 I / 1 Z n .I NilsCID NO I PARKING I .+ ` R7-18 (SIGN POST) .oLy4�y "Kr15J � ! f N �-►a C, 1 � - °.j / - (SIGR POST)*;x301 I I ` 1� �� CtYfriq:yd II 4j'• I v M r I • 8 1 .• +I \ W IF q I { R4-7_ i N ! I I "....-...-.. - (SCN P XJp• u iN`n JJ II �n I Olnd Y foo i• ;!� i I! �iis »F s � _ / III ii I K In z LYa /, I Iil IIi LLI Z ul'eelvPowy p uoH�elw»of F1INVAI tro IWY'oul•eVePeeeV p aHlwl»Fp uvHvitivpv p uyUr 1roV{M lu uvlp.VM e-A• wEIM a wuu»I.4 u n..E w61np P.videawa ayl w1'�v1'l elVl P IV3 w p I tl v 11 V IV 3�wIP puv a yPpdt.VI.q Fluo pePuplw upnV q1u az AN3tl aoi WUNMISM3 Ola yD[yr 'OYd An DI-CI-CD 3lVa AB 03NJ3H. N`d�d J N I d I�IlS t/lOS3NNIW O z [— �slusa xn�inra��s 3MlYd 7 SYORI N Lo rA� D siw Ae NvvaG M-11VA N301091>IbVd Sln0l'1S �� uaoH<«Aa wiVV �r�...—A d ON W a 03Wd3 d SYM i dLLDmd3tls 'As D3ND 530 [��,/ �M U r ~ n tlO NO V�p3d5'NY d SH tYH JLL 3�AB3K M I 'R EIE V N E I S SN1dld 1N3W3A02idWl w MON SV wN3A1d voun-1S3M Aldd T HABO � a 31VDS o _ ZZ-29 IIIHS ]IS � �1 09+9L 'b1S IWHOiVA z I /, _ NORTH No _V O b V 1 o - --� 21 RR U. R4-7-24•x30• : 3 I j (SIGN POST) o <�<o AAM I I� moo= ow ♦ 1 gSOH � 00. !1 UWo=p R: 3< x� g w II ---� h go ■ I z ooh° N III Ot,00w poo 0� (1SOd NOIS) = I I w 4 S .Ocx.+Z-L-YNW I Jro� <o II En II I ~W ill NO a 0.lno li — PARKING o I'll Blx.n-el-w III - I �Wmj� III III • � R7-1B-12"%18'... •' I (SIGN POST) N)- I H Jj oFw�W Lu o 1 z W J O V ON I S= z LLI !II w aO�m� Z Iii j QQ III � I .acx.Dd tz N0s)ra R4-7-24X30' Q) il' (SIGN POST) II 8 III ••� + �� •f�.. III ' � 11 III , 0o - II . I cp•�III :' I ,.� .i ul 'II 9z'9c+ZI :Id II 31 III � N 1 ° —I III / •' ,. .. ,_..,. _.,, 111111/8 11111 __ ... ___------ 30'R4-7-24'X `- (SIGN POST) KJ n�..'i .• 1.`'. .a W D Z< { 3 - 3vWi O N W NO. - - 1�j X ! >W V) J ' 1 133US H19Z M Cmd N05) `f .m.*r-L-4H d '+ N 1C'IL+DI :IdA. I , • 3� � I J•� ALL WAY 777 Rl-1-30'X30' o r R1-4-12'X19' o (SIGN POST) i i I3 ;s z z 3 � N I a I � � w flolAa wwI� N yV�Vy//110� �ZZS 1 p 6�Z z» Ooob b $ a3 TI H oo p1 X a R Fzbwm OL�9 ll:]HS TIS z W a< 00+0 L 'VIS ]WHO-LVA Z r ri °p>A;:f4 v, �d"d c .pl A cu6lup p c�tivauo�o yy� Q m C..1 o»Q..... o�iA af�..,. ��. n.=ro 3 Y° S�1SN3tl d'l WIN301S3H 010 IW'VPpH_AF,Iq w ml, -Icp axolu SBLYY "oH�n Nn 91-Cl-SD 'ova A9 D3N]3H° N b-�d J N I d I�I1 S 1 d10S3NNIW p z Cc) �y nl Ya r 3NAYd'D SVOM S,W Aa wxva0 �l311VA N30-100\ IWd sinol'1S vdosJHHln sD ^�J /� ///'�� < w Ln z UJ0H(((AajwCD �� Y11JJulaD W Y3NA�tl0 3 altlmwAad M ,,ua �W AG 03NDIS30 � �J v N` 1 I\ SN1�ld 1N3W3A02idWl O O W tl0 NDLLVJ01J3d5'HYId SIHI lY1LL AjLLtl3J Atl3a3H CMON Sr VVV �/ v 3nN3AV 401111-iS3M>iuvd WHA20 a 31v05 O F� W 1Z� Y7 J Q O U Zo a� H No a 0 o� � G° M Hfi aaaPi �� Sao �2S mlpww FU °NOj Uw O� ao .-5 -2 O z aaa� W 3-�- z ° o0 N 'o�o3 �J O.2ow Uwun� ow O u54Y n�tpw- �Z LLIx��6 orc J o3 a° Q W UZ�NN HO�zO Z J UO u-J F-Q�Zd I W W V n ¢Q < o Q�.o< LuJmu o=,oz d w <oz 0 rn w XJ r` a ww O i Y V Z< IVV)) N �W V)X s 421dAmo,vi,,zAvm �M I (1504 NDQ-IN .ocx.rI.-IN z-t N F. N I. O; / Z oopp,, R1-1-30'X30' (SIGN POST) to I M w W N 1 n � �s5 i (1504 NOIS) ) � 553 0 PARKING ON [Ell R7-19-12'X19' < < <=�.iyE LZ-29 ll]]HS 311S (SIGN POST) a w WE 09+9L d1S IINI�HOIVN W W a<„ J0C7NN I/ Z H n aul'N]P{» V Dw uc{i-.SVIwIN of FIIYpgI IwVIN vp IPw'a yaigawaV p wpH-AVIVVN Fp u loldppp P Weyim w >uqp,--m P wY P-A a 11 4alVw�W WP alNaada Iu1 Fff w p vwdlM vw WP D w Je ivawMa4 u uaV M1Vavaud au6lasp p vidaawa ayi Wla wVlv6pi Q m U 0 p W U- 1 0 Hdl IVIINWISM Ola rorxJPx-�3n SSLSY -nn NR SI-Cb-SD 31vD A9 D3N73iq �,,/-� N lal 3kY.Yd'Dsv= N V Id VlOS3NNIW N Z o m� O Yd�3 exM1 was AS NPYND 'A3lIVA N30100\)Wd sinol'lS �- in co UJOH(«Aa�wi� �V1I..,..wm�0 3N 9'm-Yd ID SY IN.tl N�Ae 03N7630 O RJ13 W OiO H d SNVId 1MMA021dWl UD NOLLVUl99d5'ND'ld SIMl lY1LL NLLK3U A03N3H I M] d`O= 31Y75 3nN3AV V011n-1S3M M1Vd IV LN30 0 �ZO p D:Wcy �QO y ZZNmW Z WDk]�n3 N W Q °zZp Q .z—ZG Q J U aUlo U > z�i w�x�8 vN FF- Qb�O( W aN Z Z89 W 5 W LL [7 N Q O .m o a°L m GbVA31nos vi),vZA`dM 0 �g�We.� _ m zz N a 8,°�qjQppa �cc U Q��11 D:y L e, 4a 4, „ -"�wv...w,.k.0 FF p�d D O U4¢2�S�ac7 I xz � n,1 o�0a"Woo w WI ��au9�$ p gogyz� W q_oSwF F U.�iWaaN 60: Z N a N Q CL J z Qm O f a o z UjW F.. p o z�w;z 6 N (] OOoO1 f� J G v°wo»w � _ � 01 ° J — � _ b,as b♦ b, b- k— IY u"FS O b, b. 1, m a. O �Hy.05 _ <to z-. Ia♦ , t, bf h, by S � Q t, a0,�n,no ro ♦ I k_O zp J " a z �3 0 �J�ma OZ< ^tiW m v b. 01.— mOQ z W_ Ll a W F n � u♦ a. D.D � __ ° 8 c a V V U �D. L G IJ p J N.Ni L, u W z 3:W< n a V V V la4 V V V U W W� W 4 =zlO •:. ..,.. V V V V Y V V , e. z b♦ t I, e p s la t Q .(/�/ ♦ Y. b.1. y a. w a..b.b. �•5 y� E 1, 1, b. e. e t V v ,P / V ♦ a♦ .J f.Lt J w ua�xl _b i e �t �s 10 1 1 D D u U' ♦ k 1a .. F a • vf7 � � S— - < r'1 J• 2 a I; 1 0 °o o I W I I - W w s vHI¢IwIN Jx.v I I P.uvnvP,ynv u¢i,lr:imlll nd¢adW P my'p ,P!]ualP P wd,rN,U aatl¢a .P!.(luP piPu.3W y w yv lu¢wMa4 u av¢atl¢uRlvaD P n 1l 1 'luawroop¢Ixl M1..nmm� .awn�nrni�urn nnnn\e,�n ��n\vrm�m��nrrR nvn\iT�een n\n�e rear—�nnnn•nn�\mnnan�va�nin\.nm—nr.�\ � ��Wn..•nn-in nen,. n♦ �nww �..an�nn�♦nwn�n��r..n(n-. nn� �,v.uwm,�i n.rr rnnu ren � �- ��ni�n z yen�n..(n narrn�♦ E i J = S � 5 ' - C oL,.. I.` LU I ^ YEA � F � 1� F� �. ♦.aa�aaa.♦aaaLt�\ J � III I a I � �� lr♦aati♦♦.....♦♦ 1•i� ? F: I l �.....a�ti .�.... .u.... UD 0 Y r+ f�- cl _ Q Lu % UTICA AVENUEa _. �_.. r I m dao€ 4- � JE ;I MCHLINE ... SEE SHEET 69 06 ❑ �... T s ,, ._„ 3 €n _-- ri IlI It U' FOR LINEAR PARK ❑ OElI I F¢= ? I LIMITSOFIRRMSATKIN LANDSCAPE PLAN g I LOT 2 RESIDENTIAL PHASE 2 - ❑ ❑ 6STORIES-164 UNITS I Big" 8 B y gwaga o o I 11; j < a NOTES: } Y 1. ALL BRANCHES LOWER THAN VON PROPOSED TREES SHALL BE PRUNED nw i 5 2. ALL MEDIAN PLANTINGS SHALL BE A MAXIMUM 2 HEIGHT 11 f ' k 3. VERIFY ALL LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS WITH REMOVALS AND SITEWbRK ( ' i o 4. ALL DISTURBED LANDSCAPED AREAS,NOT INDICATED AS PLANTING BEDS,ARE !vn TOBE SODDED.SOD IS TO BE PRIMARILY KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS,FREE OF LEGEND: vJ Q ° LAWN GRASS AND WEEDS.REPLACE DAMAGED LAWN GRASS WITH SOD AS Q J eDIRECTED BY ONSITE REPRESENTATIVE.MATCH ALL PROPOSED LANDSCAPED ROW/ LINE 3 AREAS INTO EXISTING. L 5. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY PLANTS REQUIRED AS REFLECTED ON PLAN. ------- LIMITS OF IRRIGATION p 6. ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL HAVE TOPSOIL PLACED AT MINIMUM DEPTH OF 4"FOR SOD AREAS,12'FOR SHRUB/PERENNIAL/ANNUAL BEDS,AND 24"FOR E TREE AREAS. j t«�} EXISTING TREES a 7. SINGLE TREE AND SHRUB PLANTINGS SHALL HAVE A 4"DEPTH SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH RING AROUND EACH BASE TREES SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM E 3' Z >DIAMETER RING.� W W J s 8. SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 4"IN DEPTH,FREE OF Q J ' ALL DELETERIOUS MATERIAL AND LOCATED IN ALL LANDSCAPE BEDS. CQ Q 9. EXISTING TREES AND SHRUBS TO REMAIN,THROUGHOUT THE PROPERTY, WEST END PRELIMINARY PLANT SCHEDULE U Z Q f SHALL BE PRUNED TO REMOVE DEAD OR UNDESIRABLE LIMBS ANDTO SHAPE j PLANT FOR DESIRABLE APPEARANCE PROTECT EXISTING TREES. F- W SYMBOL QTY COMMON NAME SIZE ROOT = 0 Q ~ 10. CONTRACTOR TO DISPOSE OF ALL REMOVALS OFFSITE.SEE EXISTING Z 0 W i CONDITIONS 8 REMOVALS PLAN FOR MORE INFORMATION. SWAMP WHITE OAK 3•CAL. BSB W 0 w 11. CONTRACTOR TO WATER PLANT MATERIAL DURING INSTALLATION AND FOR A COMMON HACKBERRY 3EMEM FOR ESTABLISHMEM AND NORMAL GROWTH "CAL. BSB W Z N J 60 DAY ESTABLISHMENT PERIOD.VOLUME OF WATER TO BE PER PLANT SKYLINE HONEYLOCUST 3'CAL. BSB Y > Y _Z Lu REQUIREMENT SIENNA GLEN MAPLE 3'CAL. BSB 12. CONTRACTOR TO WARRANTY NEW SOD FOR 60 DAYS AND NEW PLANTINGS 0 V T7 O d NEW HORIZON ELM 3'CAL. 8 S B Q 0 J FOR ONE YEAR UPON PROJECT COMPLETION. OVERSTORY CRIMSON SPIRE OAK 3'CAL. B S B aaU) o DECIDUOUS 13. IRRIGATE WITH AUTOMATIC UNDERGROUND IRRIGATION SYSTEM AT ALL NORTHERN RED OAK 9'CAL. BSB Q fi PLANTED AREAS WITHIN LIMITS AS SHOWN.SYSTEM SHALL BE COMPLETE. AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLE 3"CAL. 8 S 8 -� CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SHOP DRAWINGS FOR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS F- APPROVAL SPIREA N6 CONT, z W � s #5 cora. U 14. DECORATIVE LIGHTING SHALL HAVE OUTLETS APPROXIMATELY 30'ABOVE THE POTENTKLA J § GROUND. JUNIPER MS CONT. DATE BLACK-EYED SUSAN «1 CONT. ALERT TO CONTRACTOR: g 15. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE CONNECTION AND LAYOUT OF LIGHTING ANDE�j 7,279 ALL CONTRACTORS MUST CONTACT 03/13/2015 DECORATIVE LIGHTING OUTLET. GOPHER STATE CALL ONE 1' THE PRESENCE OFGROUNOWATERSHOULD SEANTICIPATEDONTHMPROIECI.CONTRPCTOMSED ¢S SQ.FT. CATMINT 111 CONT. SHALL INCLUDE CONSIDERATION FOR THIS ISSUE,WHEN PERFORMINGGRADINGOPERATIONS PROJECT N0. 9 SHRUB AND DURING PERIODS OF WET WEATHER,PROVIDE ADEQUATE DEWATERING,ORMNAGEAND GROUND GARDEN PHLOX 1N CONT. MN TOLL FREE 1-600-252-1166 160755001 16. DECORATIVE LIGHTING FOR TREES WITHIN MEDIAN SHALL HAVE OUTLETS PERE NSAL WATER MANAGEMENT TO CONTROL MOISTURE OF SOILS.REFER TO MASTER SNESPECIFKVATIONS. GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET i E INSTALLED APPROXIMATELY 30"ABOVE THE GROUND. BEDS CONEFLOWER *1 CONT. BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS 0 25 50 100 SHEET NUMBER 3WIN TCITY AREA 651-454-0002 2. ALLGENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED(EARTHWORK FINAL UTILRIES,AND FINAL 8 DAYLILY *1 CONT. GRADING)BY THE MILESTONE DATE W PROIECTDOCUMENTS. _ 6400 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 GENERAL NOTES: A�A ALL PLANT STOCK MUST BE ACCEPTABLE WITHIN ACCORDANCE OF Mn/DOT 3861 PRIOR TO FOLLOWING THE STANDARD MIGdI flasnNo ° Ilat IXGVATXIM WetYfX PLANTING DETAILS. BACKFILL SOIL IS A COMBINATION OF EXISTING SOIL AND COMPOST MIX. I IN srG Aa _ P1AIR AGLOImt1A ANAIMt19 clew,Tees To wrAuwrax uANrnc Batt oGsso°u �\ :.i I �� " �° ✓ �� trA�xouoON PUNrsa ntrAeu � A A BACKFILL SOIL e � � -��m�„ � spw ocssuols nes yy. ' rwtt caseous nlaa � MULCH FINISHED NSTAll�GMN1AAR FLL7H4 - - Nt1LOt�lI ix GRADE w.ua w:°°or aw r.•sss _ _^ _ 8 B Te ® a.era.arAs TM gyros a dm a'.r°ior avnur - - _ _ m t n 8 w B l i r'"'•�••�"m'°""��••°t FLANTM ON Irl1w SLOPES _ - _ - _�%m, z E ® - BALLED & BURLAPPED STOCK CONTAINER m=..-�..�. """°""°"""'��'"""'° _ PLANTING SPACNO OF MA88 G®t rxona uGr .Dose®, ��..�..am..m..a."" ...R. STOCK °°� 3 - � m. erTM :ea.n..Tow �y rLwa C 1.SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OFi.SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF a ate. °rea coeaaaN 1ISES aunt , _ HOLE. HOLE. aof /. eracx ':\ j rtxAPG ATTACH-Nrt1i O E 2.PROCEED WITH CORRECTIVE PRUNING - sx�� H >ana Aem v WOE 2.PROCEED WITH CORRECTIVE PRUNING 10a� = R.G AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER >B sru a ane rs a rm AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. r '�- � y, f- C 3.SET PLANT ON UNDISTURBED NATIVE 3.RENOVE CONTAINER AND SCORE _ 4 - - �"'m'NOat�YiO""" Milliff IM SOIL SOIL OR THOROUGHLY COMPACTED OUTSIDE OF SOIL MASS TO REDIRECT RAa E BACKFILL SOIL. INSTALL PLANT 50AND PREVENT CIRCLING FIBROUS YE€� - THE FLARE IAT OR UP TO 2"ABOVEBOVE THE FINISHED GRADE. ROOTS,AS NECESSARY. INSTAL'TGE CGAINAGE 1� isav S 3 B 4.PLACE PLANT IN PLANTING HOLE 4.SET PLANT ON UNDISTURBED NATIVE WITH BURLAP AND WIRE BASKET,(IF SOIL OR THOROUGHLY COMPACTED s a USED),INTACT. BACKFILL TO BACKFILL SOIL. INSTALL PLANT SO a�ttn�P1p"®�0 m s`�TOY°i a"a'a OYO°�"I �.�.s - nam•sr - WITHIN APPROXIMATELY 12.OF THE THE TOP OF THE ROOT FLARE IS AT A sxus rase sus - TOP OF THE ROOTBALL,THEN OR UP TO 2"ABOVE THE FINISHED tewrr ' s WATER PLANT. REMOVE THE TOP GRADE. w state iroDIW"OTC AI eaiwr°°t wa. pl`ooT m>W Fso� 1/3 OF THE BASKET OR THE TOP I p ° TWO HORIZONTAL RINGS WHICHEVER 5. WATER TO SETTLE PLANTS AND FILL "'` "' , IS GREATER. ALSO REMOVE ALL VOIDS. ,ate _ BURLAP AND NAILS FROM THE TOP _ ? ° X 1/3TWIOF THE BALL. REMOVE ALL 6.WATER THOROUGHLY WITHIN 2 I � I 1� i� E. HOURS. _ _ 5.PLUMB AND BACKFlLL W7H THE NSTALL MOO-DEW s PI SMEL POST sum $n s 7.PLACE MULCH WITHIN 48 HOURS OF Ce i BACKFILL SOIL ® i THE SECOND WATERING UNLESS SOIL sn°w�c .I wael �Par Tm A s C o gg MOISTURE IS EXCESSIVE I 40ag i 8 6.WATER TO SETTLE PLANTS AND FILL - VOIDS. aaAavr nArrs.nv�m m arrunv v wrn°roo,snn °an,u ssaa �� c .' 7.WATER THOROUGHLY WITHIN 2 PLANTING DETAL Fon POOtGr DnA1NED sods as„aaw _ srAgNO AND GtrnNG essg'"O1m'01L est K r-r gng $ k - E 8 HOURS. SEEDLING TRUE EHaTM - - c PA°DOT a)tto¢RT®hl m-m�PLflt poor anal _ E.PLACE MULCH WITHIN 48 HOURS OF m w y mm STANDARD PLANTING DETC AILS Y _ THE SECOND WATERING UNLESS ( ) SOIL MOISTURE IS EXCESSIVE. oma. v-r..+..+�....a�np.+w..+i,.+�..cu. :»••�""s"" STp7E PROJECT M. T.H.7IX No, OF 9.STAKE AND GUY TO PROVIDE TWICE ROOTBALL R...��' ' ADDITIONAL SUPPORT BETWEEN THE 1. FINISH GRADE STEM AND ROOT BALL AS DIAMETER 1 NECESSARY. 2. BACKFILL WITH PREPARED PLANTING SOIL MIX AS PLANTING DETAILS FOR ISOLATED PLANTING LOCATIONS SPECIFIED. F a � ✓ECIIAII NIS 3. 12".CLEAN SAND,COMPACTED.ADJUST LAYER I 1 u1 ' Y THICKNESS 50 TOP OF ROOT13ALL IS AT LEAST 1' L i e ABOVE FINISHED GRADE. 2 4. FILTER CLOTH - t n I I-III 5•: ."��;;'•.•'��,' �:;"«:� i I I _I .3 5. SLOPE BOTTOM TO DRAIN U -1 f- - - J -I I 6. 15%AUGERED HOLE PENETRATE THROUGH OCCLUDING Q -III- LAYER TO WATER TABLE OR TO A DEPTH OF 7'TO 5 ASSURE PROPER PERCOLATION. Q G cI-III I =I I- 6 7, BACKFILL WITH 1/2'-3/4"GRAVEL. z 8. WATER TABLE Q L! _ 7 1 D PLANTING SITUATION, N07ES: -I I� -III-III CONTRACTOR- SLTO IBAFOR A CKFlLL ENTIRE LENGTH OF e 1.STEEL POSTS TO BE NOTCHED OR DRILLED TO WIDTH VARIES - SEE PLANS PLANTING AREA TO WITHIN 6'OF BACK OF CURB OR RETAIN GUY VARUS.PLACE OUTSIDE OF ROOT EDGE OF PAVEMENT, I SECTION ll1 o BALL DRIVE PLUMB REGARDLESS OF GROUND L SLOPE. 2 3 = } S 7'ROLLED STEEL Z LLI 2.REQUESTS TO SUBSTITUTE RUBBER HOSE AND POST OR APPROVED EQUAL POOR DRAINAGE CONDITION W J L WIRE GUYING SYSTEMS WILL NOT BE APPROVED. m ! ;-H D n\ > J ' GR Q Q 3.TREE STAKING IS NOT REQUIRED UNLESS 18'LONG w < Z, Q SPECIFIED OR NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN TREES c) W JQ Z IN A J E PLUMB CONDITION WHERE VANDALISM, POLYPROPYLENE OR _ 3 SOIL,OR WIND CONDITIONS ARE A PROBLEM, POLYETHYLENE 40 MIL 111-1�-1• I-,. III=III BEST FACE OF SHRUB/ + + ❑ 0_ ❑ Q F- OR AS REQUESTED BY THE ENGINEER, 1.5" WIDE STRAPS. y--- - (;:20UNDCOVER TO FACE ATTACH WITH 10 gc [ FRONT OF PLANTING BED. 4- } 1, TOP OF SHRUB ROOTBALLS TO BE PLANTED 1'-2' I �" J Z WIRE. PLANTER ISLAND NOTES, t HIGH WITH SOIL MOUNDING UP TO THE TOP OF F- Z W 4.REMOVE AFTER ONE YEAR. REFER TO PLANT----- + + + + ROOTBALL. G) W ❑ I. CROWN ISLANDS O 5:1 SLOPES(OR AS SPECIFIED ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS). SCHEDULE FOR SPACING W W Am 2. WHEN USED IN MASSES- PRUNE ALL SHRUBS TO W Y Z W 2. CLEAR ZONE: 36'MIN.FROM BACK OF CURB TO CENTER OF NEAREST SHRUB.CLEAR ACHIEVE A UNIFORM MASS/HEIGHT. > Z lY 1 2 3 4 5 ZONE SHALL CONTAIN 4"CONTINUOUS MULCH OR NRF, SEE PLANS. Y O a MULCH 3. 4'MINIMUM OF HARDWOOD BARK MULCH. Q J 3. 2'MIN VERTICAL CLEARANCE, TOP OF CURB TO TOP OF MULCH. d a, (n ❑ 4, EXCAVATE ENTIRE BED SPECIFIED FOR GROUNDCOVER FINISHED GRADE BED. J a NOTES: ° 5 1. EXCAVATE A CONTINUOUS 24"DEEP PIT FROM TOP OF CURB FOR ENTIRE LENGTH AND _ 5. 4'MINIMUM OF TOPSOIL TO BRING TO FINISHED GRADE OJ Z ( ) I- �- (SEE GRADING PLAN), F- 5 c WIDTH OF ISLAND h BACKFILL WITH APPROVED PLANTING MIX. I I :� ?il:,. � Z f` ° 2. PROTECT AND RETAIN ALL CURBS AND BASE.COMPACTED SUBGRAOE TO REMAIN FOR ?i = I I-1 6. PREPARED PLANTING 501L AS SPECIFIED. NOTE', WHEN W U) GROUND- COVERS AND SHRUBS USED IN MASSES $ r7 STRUCTURAL SUPPORT OF CURB SYSTEM(TYP). _ '• •e•• ENTIRE BED TO BE AMENDED WITH PLANTING SOIL MIX V 3. ALL ISLANDS SHALL UTILIZE POOR DRAINAGE TECHNIQUES PER MNDOT SPECS WHEN e-- -III-)I I-I I. •'Y .s.,6 7 AS SPECIFIED. 03/DATE 5 } (-,,-�STAKINGIGUYING DETAIL FOR TREES PERCOLATION RATES ARE 2•PER HOUR OR LESS. 12" TIP. 7. SCARIFY ROOTBALL SIDES AND BOTTOM, PROJECT NO. K PLANTED MEDIANS SHRUB I GROUNDCOVER PLANTING 1so7ssool i I. SHEET NUMBER veB.TXEI � 6401 3LVa SMOISN3L ory Hdl NV WUNMIS3M 010 ux 9MM-Mo u,ply 006*Z 'ox'fin Mn 9i-Ci-C� :3¢ra AS¢3M33HD t/lOS3NNIW o =o CV 'Pn�•s N3NffWH'd OMi was Aa Na N O I lb/�2� S �I d �.l3llVA N3alOJ 1 HZIHd SU101 is " t,,� _ Y3a53HN a �lJOH CK/G�lU11� 3�.tl"" , "oao AG W � m�" mad N�rAS 03MMO SNVld 1N3W3A021dW1 3 b 3WDS 3 d VO Sa Nb-I WN3AV V011f1-iS3M ANd WdIN30 0 o N 19 ,nV I ( 1+� �q� �t �� V\ 51 oo o If ,• ,z6' > 17771 �i. I aLI, \ \ -d � \\\ � ,°, r3 i../ i i Y W ` \ \ f \\ \ � \ ` \` Hn { Q I I I = LZ ,I 0 1 - iH 1 I. O .•yrV - �JNm --o 32 m� O z Zd Ow lol Uw o Yk' L I' W ` \\ \1 PILE O �' v \ \ \\ 11 NI— I7� � u ox t�w oo4f o� �1,t ,\� ,`1l 1\,fl'ft; UW J(ru QzOz J ! x o r uj � � Q< 1 I _ gF wl •�• ` I � �� 91 i-I}-I� I� -�� IGI s ( o � � ditl ifi mWz >- s dr av o 1 la ' W o z � `,.N. " I lrljl I , �r Q __. f f U. O �; I— , ¢V N W �.i � I LW Lu I i , / u ¢a 2itO� 1 R LL LID- Lu g ? o w I?Ilup LAJ 1 Its -� Q i C rcZa W -.j Q 1 rm } V 00Li 8 i � p�f i1 L C ¢i J .7. 1 f � a Sga �m o a �ii� , oo� w (�QjIJ x x--x.11 —x--X—x--x� kx r Z r)rz 2 Nmgw u o u N� a �r G .6 ^ ax1r3 ¢ r�� t fir•, / �•+( ,l� /t �0, w FI ( rW111i ii y� o E n ; I - y�� wz i 4 /,7g % N U a� LW- wo o �zz z w 6z.WW ANN n g I i;d mUlm �w as a z n w � �3 rn w `-'�'� ??OOCC t Z _ u `=JN U � I z'�0 a r' =moaLn a a ,. I if M � o? p? ¢ am am �o 'u Z ( � �� > > �z ¢= mom} mgr z N ( I f,= 0 00 z- mzO w N f 3 I - -- i GY (7 = p. I (, / o oz_o zo b, I .I I Z_ W 1 / a w~} �I~> wiz i�zZ H J Z ' i �t / W wi� fri� wZ aZ a Dor o n— Ww, o rj ril :- S I J z w6z �zz www �rrw, n m aw— gw- mU86w � � 'n i r.!I _ /` % / a¢w zWw 5 - wF w ocm)� coicoi� o�� 6 is rr L J , r , cul'roYPP4V Pro uoN-NIWM W.41K41 MOVIM N IP4. 4 Pfo u4N-WWII RV Wi4mPe P,4 wNu9Wlro u4¢M.)roV{M¢uowmoP 4N w w4P/xtloW,P.e Io wtroY 9.oJ40 dorN WIW bl irlP Puo woG.b aYWboN N tW Yiu4M 4'oN/o JP Vwux.MM fo w'4. V A¢,wwA xu01roV Pio 4bewa WI YN.sVNO.¢'Iu4P.nW 4Yl Q m U D w 1 2 3 14 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 115 16 TREE INVENTORY A TAG# TREE DBH/HEIGHT(FT) SPECIES NOTES SAVE/REMOVE 'i 150 25' WHITE SPRUCE 10.38 Cal.Inches R 151 11 DBH BLACKASH R z x - 152 it DBH BLACKASH R a 153 11 DBH BLACK ASH R B i 154 it DBH BLACK ASH R a 155 11 DBH BLACKASH R ` 156 13 DBH BLACK ASH R 157 13 DBH BLACK ASH R iC.. 158 12 DBH BLACKASH R a.s � 160 11 DBH BLACK ASH R �e C 161 12 DBH BLACK ASH R Ba Y 162 12 DBH BLACK ASH R 163 13 DBH BLACK ASH R 6 164 13 DBH BLACKASH R r 167 11 DBH BLACK ASH R D a 168 13 DBH WEEPING WILLOW R Wo�� If 169 14 DBH BLACK ASH R � <W i 170 12 DBH BLACKASH R TREE INVENTORYm< a; <s c 171 12 DBH BLACKASH R 172 16 DBH WHITE ASH R 304 10 DBHWHITE ASH $ g3ao o E e 194 6 DBH CRAB APPLE MULTISTEM 5 305 9 DBH WHITE ASH S g"g = i 195 8 DBH CRAB APPLE MULTISTEM S 338 6 DBH CRAB APPLE R Y _ 200 13 DBH GREEN ASH R 339 7 DBH CRAB APPLE R `e 201 20' SPRUCE 8.3 Cal.Inches R 340 4 DBH CRAB APPLE R 202 25' SPRUCE 10.38 Cal.Inches R 341 4 DBH CRAB APPLE MULTISTEM R 203 10 DBH GREEN ASH R 342 8 DBH CRAB APPLE R z = F 204 11 DBH GREEN ASH R 343 9 DBH LINDEN R W s 205 12 DBH GREEN ASH R 344a_ — 10 DBH LINDEN R S � 206 11 DBH GREEN ASH R 345 10 DBH LINDEN R U ; azw sNasln3a vN d0l IVUN3G1S3N 01d iY .0 'ON�n NN AB a3A331q v:Nvxa CGL9Y 01-Cl-CD '3<VO w 3NArd"Jsram SIA ViOUNNIW O io M Q __ Aa NMraa S,Ibl�Q 'A3llVA N30100\NWd sinoi'1S w- n=' c5 11aoH �(aCwi� �Y11J m W p�3n mN 5 M1�N SlW A8 a3N7530 �O W LO SNVId AWOADNMI \ 00 XOLLVJaImdS•NY1d sIHL 1YHL A]LLaiJ AmmH 1 0 031ON SV3�Os 3nN3AV voun-1S3M>NVd WdA30 t-SS 4laZ/CZ/1 ££L l-a '3NIa33N19N3 03a3ll31 'Oil N31Vld 31Y1d Hs a°d a3M3S MHOIS rios3NxiN >I3ed s1no1'75m 0 6 sMUMHM C* x 4a 3c L3xSr0 z Si iv 3N3adOSN10d'Yla m {and tris an w 3nooaa Havn � z o x 14 3- m m JJ °Fu 17zr m 30VdanS dQL � HLIM Hsn13 03SWZJ ��j O w Sa31131 HOW, ��>' h �'3 �' z io O aaaaaaaaaaaa°0aa o QoQoQoO o=U=U= yoa4 g a5 n tj�z �� s .91/C 1 °a°�°�°�° ��'°gyp a°�° 3 v<�i „ x = o 0 0A0 0 �,I4o�-,ry ,aoa uwi laVdV.OZI O o�o a ll a n a�a a�aOo s \ • Y .r/rn o � lJ s°m°HI>G3ns(c a s o a a�a=a—a� 310H len'VIO.{ �a�a 0 a O aa� b 3 0 0 D o c o �oobJ a o D o e St> � _.z >-5 4lOZ/CZ/l ££Ll-a 9NI833NION3 Z-M 41oZ/CZ/l 31zzoN 83dwnd zaols `JNI833NION3 'oN 3�ra S31ONVH 1.111 HLIM all N31Vld oN 31ra HIM 1NV80AH NOn1Va3W MOlO rios3NNiN 31r1d HSI16nd >I3ed Stn01N'a$m 31r1d HSnBndJed Slnol']Sm �L 03U103dS 3SWA83H10 SS31Nn N3dO NIVY138 01 310H d33M N0018 iSnaHl 313NON00.GX.gLX.9L NLLIIzI MY 8313Wom oana o4 SO 13NSV0 nl V03h vY 3N38V."I dOSOd 'VIa ,{ HOA lV3S On NI 3AO080 'HOVW l Z +.4/£ 'NOOH 8V310 '.l'O l 'NIW {re° " »Z/L- .L 'AIOd lIW 4 30 � 331 S83AYI Z HIMa3A00 of 3nlVA 31V0 .9 m 1V17103 O3AO8ddtl 30V38nS d01 c 1tl01dA1 .4Z 'sOaVONV15 Sa38n10V3nNVW ONV I a0 a01dtlOV 'A'O Q �jQ0 oo VMMV aid S1NV8oAH 1NIVd aNV 3WIad a3'nV1SN1 < I XOS 3A1VA HIM HSnld 03SItl8 � Il��1I11�� SI 3 V8 IgnONly{�18 3H1 2131.iV 03a1Vd3 3B IIVHS SHUAl HOIH opo,q �� Q 0 NOLL nLLLSNOD JNIanU a3JVWV0 SONLLYO 1Ntl210AH ggu�7�log`oe�� o� 3aV80 03HSINIj XVW„9£ 0 o t� ONnOao MO1ON 'NIW„4Z NO.9l/£ L ()oagoggg�g`� IV 3ONVl! 008Va(L�9S31ZZ0Nl 3SOH(Z)Onm ONV 0 30tla01alsnraV HSINU S310NVH IS�2S`��25`�2S(o�y�n�r� 3lZZON a3dWnd Z801S („S) HONI3/�Li (1 3N0 laVdV .OZL 0 1d1� 1'0 (Z 0 0 Q �d�" "�� HIM O31lddnS NOIllVO3W MOIO 38 Ol 1NVMOAH soul 0NIH0tl1S(£ .ro/£ sz g0�+00 0 - lroldu ,ro olloQoO 0— g0 o 1NV80AH HOV3 803 0311VISNI taOg�g` ONV 03HSIN8n3 38 Ol - 81`41-1.i96 - .0.6 311HM V 03H - 83N8VW 1NV8OAH 83ONI3V80AH �-I pYpl" g k"o a 7Fb 2U a Rd2N a = XZ� o d a _ ', zj z Y'�am �mU< o o J a -VP o$ i it, g w otsm -x>— 0ig 11 'J`rc _z<m� 6 Z> �>HaFmoLY-{> wb U� n �z VNo�xwaS8w < is OF ~aa ZN 2.5 <Woblwtt 2 ^< w Sd NJ�rca a'dmw m i z op z m F=<ri zFz w3 o Krc �� o Yi- d oo tuw a> w3 orow wiz z #cpi' �'i !��13 r 'Bo�<Xg rco w z i mazl`b z�` �b $a m O d w < x cola ai ao m�oi m Qa„`.ji7l:— z a dim cli roXlv z2w 0 w3 < w zo a.< �F \ mm3l9rWtlA 1 I O •O a< m Y mw 02 1 �j z q SS ZZig 5; ' =oN k < U VI 318VIaVA �+- z y�yII < a °' Wyw n In �IplyyzJ m �� rc IN m g3:�i y, z 'nZ d v bi �b�� glltlfo S < 8o mw J� g .z 4 o w V p p ut Zdbl u Q » a marc F o F z Ww r m -oa b� c zo b m um�} Z m Y < p k�wo zo 3 �aQ�z m¢� a cyizyy m S `IIIS �� a pVlw�Om z� N < < w SB¢ �•�€ U zdzmo:< m �g 1,3 :v z n Z 1 [6 l" oa all w�z_w�+vi Ogg$ om �mz<3�a nammmzw io s rn. < z 3 8 U g r590�� j� b W W Jwn m.zl n .n � il- < FF +�3 Z `O vo<go ¢� W •„ N "' "° I ogb?u�iul, rnzW v�zW ea7t V) __ z w� z c�¢� calm. S F�' mph.: z�g zmz §ppbp >_ ��m< Ci. oo`.' W� F�U a 8 a SW8U ra �� a w `d h $a$xB� rco 4 -1°m a pzp Q � 2 'f'•. '.•;'.. xlna mU?m3py zp $rc'ly' YEZ �BY� N o� _ �Jm = 04 ww f l wm� JL Wlw z �No . w vcV v eH�ai Ivgi ax-R. uollazVv,N atx+1 VIIM lw wMs4 Vlaaol e g STREET A (3) N0. 4 EPDXY COATED c0I15TRUC1IW EXPAN90N REINFORCING BARS. NOTES JOINT CONTINUOUS BETWEEN EXPANSION 1.SASS—B—IWVS PAYTIENT AS OIREC BY 111E ENOIWo, 1J0 LFA .) EXPANSION JOINTS. JOINT �.ROIOYE I=AVAI BIIMMINWS MAIEMAt(+16 S.Y.) E J.REYO��MW TEE AND APPROgMA Y 20 LF.OF D.IY. A 4.CONS E DCT W 5 0E IX OP EE ANO APPRID 1M E1Y ZO Li.OF iG Fm+w 1Bwi pr®wTATL°)c°dR �Prsor`�sEOSEu'ou.v.' �"�'N11N" FACE OF CURB 3.BAp(Fll.IZ BA 1O•IR 1G OF W GRADE MIN EACAVA SS MATEMAL 6'TAP ER EDGE OF GUTTER OR SUTAaE BADOTLL REBUILD 1PEN01 R11M 6'OF C1A55 9 ACdiEOATE -' BASE IN TON).2.OF TYPE 31 BIIUYNOMS SASE(16 TMI Aro 2'Or ME 41 A BNUIemIrs HEAR(16 TW). c 6,w DEP1N FROM SGtCiT GRADE M nE TOP OF nE WTSDE DROP ASSEMBLY PPM r IS AATFLY 15 U. VARIABLE s 8618 CURB RADIUS IESTM6TI�Si�T,w'"o"aaE>ox Fa+ALCRAIX r_I p ��LANDSCAPED MEDIAN AND GUTTER "`EMOE C •` EXPANSION L i $ JOINT MEDIAN NOSE O e < TOP VIEW ^ ; ' 15LF.a Ezuv"nW 61 TAPER WEAR COURSE/FG PAVEMENT TOP OF CURB/MEDIAN E ovcD(oADJACENT (OR EE SEE PLANFOR TYPE D�y _ VARIABLE 21, _ WIDTH T Y 3 _ CON5IRUCT IW PVC(DR 16) WJITARY SEMER MEDIAN NOSE 1/2" EXPANSION JOINT & FILLER TIE BARS OR PAVEMENT TIES REQUIRED IN NEW CONCRETE Y 6 �� PAVEMENT OR CONCRETE BASE ae� s -- ' SIDE VIEW END VIEW < B o - cavNECT PROPosm+D•Pvc To Ebslwc COURSE. TIE BARS SHALL BE 6��-' • •�� .,�.. I 9'Y17 MIN A FER1 CWPLER 0R ANi z 3 N APPROYEp EW/L N0. 4 X 2' SPACED AT 2' O.C. , e i}T " 3'-0' MIN. vs N. c :I $ AGGREGATE € € 31 BASE SECTION A—A CONCRETE MEDIAN W/ SLOPED NOSE Sao asgS o /SSL.Louis Park PDATEH PNO SANITARY SEVER AND DROP ASSEMBLY REPMR! AIRS o /(/MINNESOTA VALLEY GUTTER ENGINEERING 1/23/2014 5T-3 0 O 2 2 _ E Z m' N v m o - < z � �i h S ,I � 6 3 O BACKFILL 1/2"EXPANSION JOINT 12" OR 1/4 BC CONTRACTION JOINT >< ALLEY OR U) ` ) EXPANSION JOINTS AT e (WHICHEVER IS GREATER) 60'MAXIMUM. DRIVEWAY — ................. 12" MIN. 4"CONCRETE WAL ro N 8 / WITH 4"SAND BED G v 6"OR 8"CONCRETE WALK ' P WITH 6"CLAS 5 BASE a \ COMPACTED GRANULAR ' STORM \ ENCASEMENT o BAR BOULEVARD P j SEWER \ COMPACTED GRANULAR BEDDING CURB AND GUTTER-- I W 1 s j 1/4 BC MIN. 1/2"EXPANSION JOINT Z NOTES; W "" 1. PRIVATE OUTWALK IN R—O—W MUST CONFORM TO MNDOT&ADA STANDARDS. J $ UNDISTURBED GROUND 2. ALL SIDEWALK CROSSING DRIVEWAYS OR ALLEYS SHALL HAVE THE SAME Q Q I . THICKNESS AS THE APRON. Q rj) " NOTE: 3. ONE PANEL ON EACH SIDE OF APRON CROSSING SHALL BE SAME THICKNESS U Z J Q E ALL PIPES SHALL BE BEDDED IN THE EXISTING POORLY GRADED AS THE APRON. W4. PED RAMP AREAS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 6" THICK. a ❑ Z s SANDS. SUBCUT BELOW PIPES A MINIMUM OF 1FT AND BACKFILL WITH POORLY GRADED SANDS. Z O O W co (� N ❑ PIPE BEDDING (CLASS J31 St Louis Park PUBDSH I PLATE W Y z LU FOR RCP STORM SEWER �MINNE9OTA SIDEWALK DETAIL DATE O. > ENGINEERING 1/23/2014 5T-9 ( J 0 W s U DATE 03/13/2015 PROJECT NO. 160755001 E SHEET NUMBER l 6510 u 1111111 MIN.i0' MAX.30'COMMERCIAL 8'CONC.SIO AUX L E 8'BOULEVARD SLAB _ 1/2" SIONYI BOULEVARD m IT RAD.COMMERCIAL 4 � 5 � f ' c ---- --- EXPAN9DN JOINT 1/2" R sn 3" R O CENTER CONTROL JOINTS TO 1/2" R i BE USED ONLY ON DRIVES HATH SIDEWALK SAWCU7 AND PATCH 1 <' OVER 12'IN WIDTH WITH BIT.WEAR PATCH MIX. l3 3/4" PER TOP BIT. END APRON A 1r TYPICAL E END OF RADIUS 04 �/�'�' FOOT MAT 7" 3e E COMMERCIAL 8"THICK CONCRETE. \ Ct COMPACTED GRANULAR BASE. ..1f2' R. Y p 61-- _-___- •- ..a. Y R WITHOUT SIDEWALK 7 1�2" BASE 's NOTE: 8" 18" r R s CONCRETE CURB TO BE c>yl$ S CONCRETE POURED INTEGRAL WITH 8618 CURB & GUTTER �� r APRON, MAX.5%CROSS Ly THICKNESS SCHEDULE SLOPE DRIVEWAY THICKNESS AREAS dw<= APRON,BLV. W ", COMMERCIAL e" sue,sDE- W'4I'K' SPECIFICATION € €� E CONCRETE TO BE MnOOT 1/2" R 6., 3" R tl 30 3A32 MIX DESIGN WITH I 8 67.t 1%AIR CONTENT. 3" R "` 1 3/8" fibo� o ' Pueusl PLATE 13 SLOPE SAME TOP BIT. gaa�"w�; 6 St.Louis Palk Dart NO. L° AS ROADWAY _ s` ®MINNESOTA COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY c"I - /DATE4 ST-2 \ ° I� ENGINEERING � a 0 z m EACH AREA IS 1/2 11 a 1 2 R < o m W TABULATED TO 1 r ° / _ $ TOTAL AREA BASE 2 2 5 3 a TEE PLUGGED CROSS WYE B618 CURB & GUTTER (OUTFALL) J R r 1/4" PLYWOOD OVER FACE a � OF BOLTS Q lij l BEND PLUGGED CROSS PLUGGED TEE PLUG OR CAP 0 i �" rz 2'-6' 2'-6" 8" CONCRETE WITH 6X6 10/10 WELDED WIRE MESH, OR BURY BURY NOMINAL TEE DEPTH PER GEOTECHNICAL REPORT. PROVIDE DOWELS FITTING TEE' WYE, 90' BEND PLUGGED 22 1/2' 11 1/4' BETWEEN PAVEMENT SECTIONS .� SIZE, PLUG OR PLUGGED ON RUN 45' BEND BEND BEND t0' CL 5 AGGREGATE BASE(100x " =101 mrxYaA wrowr nrn�Yuxm ew INCHES CAP CROSS 1 2 "*' * A A RECYCLED CRUSHED LIMESTONE) w 4 1.0 1.4 1.9 1.4 1.0 3 sem...%" r 6 2.1 3.0 4.3 3.0 1.6 1.0 - W _ _ APPROVED SUBGRADE I I-I I-I 1 a 8 3.8 5.3 7.6 5.4 2.9 1.5 1.0 > 10 1 5.9 8.4 11.8 8.4 4.6 2.6 1 1.2 I = I= I ¢ Q 12 8.5 12.0 17.0 12.0 6.6 3.4 1.7 Q > gY 4 R 14 11.5 16.3 23.0 16.3 8.9 4.6 2.3 V Z E -I , CONCRETE PAVEMENT BUS TURNOUT 16 15.0 21.3 30.0 21.3 11.6 6.0 3.0 t= w g _ C9O� 0 soa°A� 18 19.0 27.0 138.0 27.014.6 7.6 3.8 O 1/2" EXPANSION JOINT EVERY H Q ~ = s 4 20 23.5 33.3 47.0 33.3 18.1 9.4 4.7 60', CONTRACTION JOINT EVERY 6' H Z0 O W 24 34.0 48.0 48.0 68.0 26.2 13.6 6.8 " STEEL TROWLED CO w(7 W 0 saal INSTALLATION DETAIL NOTE: ABOVE BEARING AREAS BASED ON TEST PRESSURE OF 150 P.S.I. AND AN EDGES AND JOINT'S MEMBRANE CURING COMPOUND 3 WY Z W _ s ALLOWABLE SOIL BEARING STRESS OF 2000 POUNDS PER SQUARE FOOT. TO COMPUTE (200 SF/GALLON) (STD. WALK) �[> Z ®µNnLoouis Park PDAUE PLATE TE BEARING AREAS FOR DIFFERENT TEST PRESSURES AND SOIL BEARING STRESSES, USE COARSE BROOM �' 0- J ' ENGINEERING SIGN INSTALLATION DETAIL 1/23/2074 M-1 THE FOLLOWING EQUATION: FINISH d DL N a BEARING AREA=(TEST PRESSURE/150)x(2000/SOIL BEARING STRESS)x(TABLE VALUE) 4" CONCRETE WALK (3A32) O e NOTES: -� T CONCRETE THRUST BLOCKING TO BE POURED AGAINST UNDISTURBED EARTH. Z € 2. KEEP CONCRETE CLEAR OF JOINTS AND ACCESSORIES. 4" CL.-5 (CONCRETE WALK) W 3. IF NOT SHOWN ON PLANS, REQUIRED BEARING AREAS AT FITTING SHALL BE AS U s INDICATED ABOVE, ADJUST IF NECESSARY TO CONFORM TO THE TEST PRESSURES DATE AND ALLOWBLE SOIL BEARING STRESS(ES). -I I - COMPACTED, APPROVED 03/13/2015 4. BEARING AREAS AND SPECIAL BLOCKING DETAILS SHOWN ON PLANS TAKE SUBGRADE PROJECT NO, PRECEDENCE OVER BEARING AREAS AND BLOCKING DETAILS SHOWN THIS NOTE: 160755001 E STANDARD DETAIL. ALL EXCAVATION, 6" CL.-5 OR 4" SELECT GRANULAR, PLACEMENT, COMPACTION AND SHEET NUMBER a BACKFILL INCIDENTAL TO UNIT PRICE BID FOR 4" SIDEWALK OR MEDIAN. WATERMAIN THRUST BLOCKING CONCRETE WALK 6520 6 a A -� MAX.2.0% LANDING MAX.2.07 € 1 LANDING E I I n 5 2.0% 5 8.3% 4'X4'MINIMUM 2 4'X4'MINIMUM � OO ©O s 3 ; BACK OF CURB FLARE FLARE 58.3% 58.3/. 3 FLOW LINE OPTIONAL V CURB-\, 2 1 O5 4 1 2 OR GRADING g Q @ i.. R 3 's FRONT OF GUTTER OPTIONAL V CURB r e A OR GRADING © d PERPENDICULAR P :9 2.0% O 1 o :5 2.07 1 <3n MAX.2.0% LANDING 5 2.07 I \ MAX.2.0% LANDING �. M 5 2.0% ® B 58.3% 1j © i yI <8.3% ©8 O9 O 1 3 O °.°°°°. e 3% 5 2.0/. 5 2.0% 58 O5 I Ea S ©&0 4'X4'MINIMUM �y�S a 58.3% 58.3% 6 4'X4'MINIMUM I/FLQ '_ 11I 3 O oeO4° 2 i °°4 a € i f .... 2 E z 1 Q 4 i z DEPRESSED CORNER � � B FAN PARALLEL NOTES: gg o W SEE STANDARD PLATE T038 AND SHEET 4 OF 5 FOR DETAILS ON DETECTABLE WARNING. a SLOPES ARE DEFINED AS ABSOLUTE ELEVATION DIFFERENCE PER LENGTH OF RUN. u = g (AS OPPOSED TO A RELATIVE SLOPE WITH RESPECT TO A CURB LINE OR CURB HEIGHT.) f 3 a '_^ LANDINGS SHALL BE LOCATED ANYWHERE THE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTE CHANGES m a J DIRECTION,AND AT THE TOP OF RAMPS THAT HAVE RUNNING SLOPES GREATER THAN 5%. P a INITIAL CURB RAMP LANDINGS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITHIN 15'FROM THE BACK Z OF CURB,WITH 6'FROM THE BACK OF CURB BEING THE PREFERRED DISTANCE. e z 3 2 SECONDARY CURB RAMP LANDINGS ARE REQUIRED FOR EVERY 30" OF VERTICAL RISE WHEN THE LONGITUDINAL SLOPE IS 5% OR GREATER. A WALK © O �� CONTRACTION JOINTS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AT ALL GRADE BREAKS. p1• Q i _ Ail �y1 4 TOP OF CURB SHALL MATCH PROPOSED ADJACENT WALK GRADE. (n © 58.3% 52.0% © © �f�j0• 1 USE 6" CONCRETE FOR ALL INITIAL RAMP AND LANDING AREAS. J ` I52.0% 58.3% CONTRACTOR SHALL EMPLOY APPROPRIATE METHODS FOR INTERMEDIATE GRADE a Q TO NON-WALKABLE OR ° 5 CONTROL TO ENSURE ALL GRADE BREAKS ARE CONSTRUCTED PROPERLY. 5� WALKABLE SURFACE @�a6° °° 4 ALL GRADE BREAKS SHALL BE PERPENDICULAR TO THE DIRECTION OF s jig. z SP TRAVEL/PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTE. ui 4'MINIMUM WIDTH OF DETECTABLE WARNING IS REQUIRED FOR ALL RAMPS.SHARED Q FLARE FLARE i P USE PATHS SHALL HAVE DETECTABLE WARNING ACROSS THE ENTIRE WIDTH OF PATH = WHEN THE PATH CROSSES A ROAD. 2 1 Q5 4 1 2 2 QI 0" CURB HEIGHT. a 2O FULL CURB HEIGHT. 3O LESS THAN 57 PREFERRED.5-8.37 SHOULD ONLY BE USED AFTER ALL OTHER W 9 TIERED PERPENDICULAR DIAGONAL @ SLOPES HAVE BEEN CONSIDERED AND DEEMED IMPRACTICAL. % O4 1/2" PREFORMED JOINT FILLER MATERIAL AASHTO M 213.JOINT FILLER SHALL BE PLACED 'z r FLUSH WITH THE BACK OF CURB AND ADJACENT SIDEWALK.JOINT SHALL BE FREE OF DEBRIS. 5 -( = RECTANGULAR DETECTABLE WARNINGS SHALL BE SET BACK 3" FROM THE BACK OF CURB. Q J RADIAL DETECTABLE WARNINGS SHALL BE SET BACK 3"-6" FROM THE BACK OF CURB. Q cn Q5 SEE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTE CURB AND GUTTER DETAIL FOR INFORMATION ON U Z CONSTRUCTING CURB AND GUTTER AT CURB OPENINGS.SEE SHEET NO.3 OF 5. =d Lu Q I F © 4-BY 4-MIN.LANDING WITH MAX.2% SLOPE IN ALL DIRECTIONS. Z O O W i CURB OR 7D IF RUNNING SLOPE IS LESS THAN 5.0% NO SECONDARY LANDING IS REQUIRED. co p c CURB OR CURB AND GUTTER 4'0"MIN. 8 V CURB,IF USED,SHALL BE PLACED OUTSIDE THE SIDEWALK LIMITS WHEN RIGHT OF O W W VAR. 4'0"MIN. O WAY ALLOWS.SEE SHEET 5 OF 5. Y Z co " CURB AND GUTTER REQUIRED LANDING SLI s 1/4" R RAMP REQUIRED LANDING 1/4" R > Z Ir _ Q9 DETECTABLE WARNINGS MAY BE PART OF 4'X 4'LANDING AREA IF IT IS NOT — V FEASIBLE TO CONSTRUCT THE LANDING OUTSIDE OF THE DETECTABLE WARNING AREA. w n J "n ` :. ° - ®O SEE SHEET 4 OF 5,TYPICAL SIDE TREATMENT OPTIONS,FOR DETAILS ON FLARES d a-co o e:•.'a:. ":a . , <. AND RETURNED CURBS. — ° 0.02 FT./FT.MAX. a ti'a a J a °uFT./FT. 11 SEE SHEET 3 OF 5 FOR FURTHER DETAIL.6 CONCRETE 0.083 CONCRETE O � OJ 4 WALK OR FLATTER 4 WALK 0.02 FT./FT.MAX.©O9 O DIAGONAL RAMPS SHOULD ONLY BE USED AFTER ALL OTHER CURB RAMP TYPES HAVE BEEN Z °s CONSIDERED AND DEEMED IMPRACTICAL. W Gn 3 SECTION A-A SECTION B-B sruloum PLM slur Ha U 3 5-297.250 (1 OF 5) DATE PERPENDICULAR/TIERED/DIAGONAL/FAN PARALLEL/DEPRESSED CORNER srArrouto APPROW]>, PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP DETAILS 03/13/2015 MAY 10,2012 PROJECT No. 160755001 a STATE PROD. NO. (TH } SHEET NO. OF SHEETS SHEET NUMBER E r 6530 s�3d d01 TdIlN301S321 Ola .,-rwxxpN Ain 9�W 'ox'0 n Sti`L-CD '�vD AS 03NO3HD 3WVd'Dnswvm SIA VIOS3NNIW o °zo i Q _'.A�nwn ° S�I`dl�4 �A3lldA N30lOO\NZl1Id sinoi'1S � W- z q- UJOH(((Aalwr 3 vi... n t n lKl irn MW-ld SVA�a S,Lv AS 03NDIS30 SNV1d 1N3W3AO2ldWLo l "° o w "°D�""'g""a�" """°°'"®m" MION SV 3nN3"voun-1S3M muvd W8111430 o 31VDS Z_ Fm ZF Wim F m W CE L- UO p0HHw Q Um mZU O BOLL J V)LL ZON N a � U �C N ! Q } + O U F p Q _ O O Z D N (7 pW p 3 Q Q Wm N N W 7 Z w o IIWoe- II Z z_o U m =vwi Fo •�Q ( ¢ woo z LzW�w m a V N ZO J OO J LL,W o 0 F �w �Z V) _ - W J O W V Z 2 Z m Zz Z_ �V Z d Z V) m p Z 0 U< D Z U O K U Q W JJ W U N 21,0O Z� Z_ p [O W Z Z as w ~~ � zz • Qa V) 30 z� Q J LAwQ �N JW V)2 OZ W w O a F p Q w Q V O m O Q m m m w LY w m wJ~ d' J J pJ J J Z O�W U JJ U 7 7 w�i O O O F'Vm D wJ mN Q Q Q� mN Q Q �0 V N Q Q BOJ J J Oviz m m V Q m_ m m V mQ "i.tr D : z w tm1 c� c� m c� c) a x Li \W < < SFU \> OZ O JO \W,..� OZ O Z w Zw Na L) o� � C z o�Z mx z F- -W- F- mz m=m k'w �O w ��~a Q O WO L,() Y OZU QJ.y '<CK, p 0¢ OU� W QN QZ V J w= m Z ~ Z U U m Q .N-i (V U O m O V (V m Q U p m Q Z W~ U U m O W W Z m '- OZ O W O ZLA. V m N OZ O W O 2phW a a o �Np VW c)m P W ow om ��o N 0 0 (.7 QRZ U OZ V r ZF WN \ 2 n LL O O O V)IS I\\� —_ w Wp wwOU W L+L W � \: m p Wo ILL IS II: Ln vwiwa Q S zQ \/ wwZo `a'd'z 3 i j pao � \� Zoo J Q m III= ooz 0 �x Waw U �� \j ��z Z as _ Quo ml ow /i WOW Q' m i;iiii �w3 \\: omaV Q 3§ I owz to to �\ ¢m. O N� \\ mFpZ IIS J?m mono oFQ /� �m� \� gQ.W 0 WWW /i ��o Z�� _ III Q1� \ i a .o Qwwz —III=1 I I=1 I— O Xwwzo d<V)a. C9mwU -p.—A. 11 4114.,. P p ..pa,m a o.a .n,w .nw n ...v v. 41.1E..l$vp pw wd..- .m ai.,.anew•�..wwpp.wL CONCRETE JOINT CONSTRUCTION NOTES: SEE DETAILS JOINT SEALER. SEE DETAILS ON 1. PRIOR TO INSTALLING JOINT SEALERS IN TRANSVERSE JOINTS, THE JOINTS SHALL BE WIDENED BY SAWING THIS DRAWING. ALONG THE FULL LENGTH OF THE JOINT. 6 2. TYPE "E" JOINTS - EXPANSION MATERIAL SHALL BE ATTACHED TO EXISTING PAVEMENT IN A MANNER APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. 9" a ; 3. JOINTS IN CURB TO MATCH PAVEMENT JOINTS. ` e a 4. ALL REINFORCING BARS SHALL BE EPDXY COATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SPEC. 3301 AND SHALL MEET + THE REQUIREMENTS OF GRADE 60 FOR AASHTO M-31M OR M-53. JOINT SEALER. SEE DETAILS ON THIS DRAWING. 3 DOWEL BAR ASSEMBLY FOR STANDARD KEYWAY SEE STANDARD PLATE NO. 1141 5. JOINT SEALANT SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MN/DOT SCHEDULE OF MATERIALS CONTROL AND ONE i OF THE APPROVED SILICONE SEALANTS AS INDICATED ON THE APPROVED MATERIALS LIST. r. s TIE BARS: ALL REBARS ARE IN METRIC DESIGNATIONS, FOR T510" USE NO. 13 BARS 2'-6" LONG AT O 2'-6" SPACING. FOR T>10" USE NO. 16 BARS 3'-0" LONG AT 2'-6" SPACING. ._ •� j 6. CONCRETE JOINTS SHALL BE CUT WITHIN 16 HOURS OF PLACEMENT OR AS SOON AS THE PAVEMENT IS ; C4E-D CONTRACTION JOINT n L2KH LONGITUDINAL HIDGED JOINT STRONG ENOUGH NOT TO RAVEL WHEN SAWED. �a E � { 'S H {I g N 6 + NO. 13 REBAR M M 3/8" d 3 JOINT SEALER. SEE DETAILS ON 5/8 j SAWN VERTICAL FACE « EXISTING CONCRETE THIS DRAWING. + '9 D I 1.7 �PAVEMENT � �m�s s p ILL WITH SEALANT 4ao a 9. i:r I 'FILL WITH SEALANT 1 •3/8" gao e e 2 1/4" e w N a a 1/2" 0 FOAM ROD $ , FOR SINGLE PANEL REPLACEMENT: ( 1/2" WIDE PAPER TAPE CLOSED CELL TYPE) < 8 m s BOND BREAKER a = USE A MINIMUM OF 3 BARS PER SIDE. INSERT BARS •*.. e: IN EPDXY FILLED 5/a" DIA. x 15" DEEP DRILLED HOLE. • EXPANSION MATERIAL EXPANSION JOINTS CONTRACTION w L3T LONGITUDINAL � � Q g �CONSTRUCTION JOINT-TIED @11H CONTRACTION JOINT 5 EXPANSION JOINT 6 CONTRACTION JOINT U z I- 0O0w s (2) #13 DEFORMED BARS 3—N0. 16 x 30" DEFORMED BARS @ 12" O.C. p T&B AT ALL LOCATIONS WHERE JOINTS DO NOT ALIGN. NO REINFORCEMENT REQUIRED W a WHERE JOINTS ARE MISALIGNED BY 2 FEET 0 } OR LESS. w J Q J Q EXISTING OR U W Q PROPOSED �j d C3 Q CONCRETE 30" H J E" z s PAVEMENT V)IZ a ca 0 _ W Y_Z W t 3� z = 8618 CURB O a AND GUTTER 4: F Q c�c d -� 5 LLLCCL.. $ U DATE 03/13/2015 EXTRA REINFORCEMENT AT PROJECT NO. EXTRA REINFORCEMENT AT OFFSET PAVEMENT JOINTS TIED CURB DETAIL 160755001 MANHOLE OR CATCH BASIN g g SHEET NUMBER aE 8 r 6550 E 900 900 900 900 890 890 890 890 200x t --:-_.... 880 880 6 890 _-- ,..._._. _._200% .__ _ _._.... ___.. 890 890 _. - __.. ._ _..__ __._. _..._. 890 880 -_ 2.Oo1c,. .. B.0 2oox -_. ...._. �t 2oox _. • ' 200x 2 ._.. .. o 6 .._. �•r .. ,Y .. OOx ...2 OOx • 880 2.00fi Z 200 E 9 ••, YY an 8 aso 880 880 �g 880 870 �$ 870 970 �� a -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 7t5D 10 20 30 40 50 60 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60870 10+50 13+50 16+00 � 3 900 900 900s g aop aso aso aso aeo g 2.00% 990 ._._ -- J--- 2 0% Z 20Dx q., .__ �...... ZDOx r200x p .. fi:,._ 2o0x --...yam __2.aofc ..._... __._ 890 890 \. _.._.. __. . _ - -_.. _.- 890 880 __ .._.._. ..._.__... ._-.._... _._ 880 88 g ,, 0 880 200x 2oox zODx 2.- 880 99a 850 68o mo 23 880 970 87a 970 i. -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 7p 7+00 10+00 13+00 15+50 6 900 900 900 900 890 890 890 r 890 ' _. 200x a 690 _ 2DDx _.--2.00x - 2.00R 2.00x q., e. 200x �2.007G &¢�3 _ .:,..._ Dox ..____zo0x 2oox - ._... 890 890 ._ ._.- _.__ _.._ ..._. __._ _... _ ..._ .. f 890 880 880 850 _. r __._2.00x. z _ 0 zODxs•7 _ .... 8808<€ _ 3., HBe 880 850 880 �� 1514 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 3 40 50 6 880 870 S2 870 870 5 0 0 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -70 0 10 20 30 40 50 5070 6 6+50 9+50 12+50 15+00 g gg € t _ate a o 900 900 900 900 890 890 890 890 m g i 6 s 890 , oax _ zoox ao0%q., - r -200x _._ .__. _. 890 890 - _.. _...... ._..... _.... 890 880 _... __ _. .._ - ---- ...__. e.• raaax 2ODx 2oox z.aox _. _._. ¢ 5 880 880 - ... 880 _ -a.. 200x 2.00x z00x 4 200x ? c �� 870 870 do U) .10 9 594 60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60850 884 60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 �0 10 20 30 40 50 60880 87060 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0� 10 20 30 40 50 60 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60870 VJ 7 6t00 9+00 12+00 I 14+63.17 O a 900 O goo 900 900 890 890 890 890 1y U a U Lu L .._ 1.72x .__. 4 __ ... 200x 2.00x 2OOx q•, E.00 A __.- moxB•T�::-. .-,:. 890 890 - 890 880 _..._. _ _..._. 880 880 � S9p _ _.._ ��_«. zoax-,__ _. ._zoD,• q oox k ._.. 9:, 2200x .._.Z00% Z007G _. 2.00x _. 200x ___ .. .....__._.. 580 m� LumS 50 3 s 580 60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 ��60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 80 870 70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0� 10 20 30 40 50 70 870 60 -50 -4a -30 -20 -10 1 4 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Z J 5+50 8+50 11+51.56 J i 890 890 Q z 900 goo 900 900 890 U Z 6 890 Lu �fL C3 On_.__._.z0ax , zoox 2.00% W C7 � D 7 890 .__B•' ..__.-2nox... __..2Dox ---.�.'2oox ...... _... 890 890 ___. __ _.- ____ _. _.. -_ ....._....__. 890 880 _.. _ _ _ ___ _. __. ...... 880 880 a• &:Y....._.2.00x 2a07c1 2oox 2 _.__.. W Y Z 55 _ ea0 Y3 z a a) o om yy Jam= 850 880 �8 880 azo 870 970 5 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 50 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 50 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 4 0 5+00 B+OD 11+00 FC_L 14+00 W U DATE ALERT TO CONTRACTOR: 03/13/2015 ALL CONTRACTORS MUST CONTACT 1, THE PRESENCE OF GROUNDWATER SHOULD BEANTICIPATEDONTJSPRGJECT.CONTRACTOR5810 PROJECT NO. GOPHER STATE CALL ONE SHALL INCLUDE CONSIDERATION FORTHISISSUE.—ENPERFORMINGGRADINGOPERATIONS 160755001 00-252-1166 WATER MANAGEMENT TO CONTROL MOISTURE OF SOILS,REFER TO MASTER SPIE SPECIFIGATONS. SHEET NUMBER j 6 DURING PERIODS OF WETWEATHER.PROVIDE ADEOUATEDEWATERING,DRAINAGEANDGROUND BEFORE CONSTRMIN TOLL FREE UCTION T ON BEGINSS TWIN CITY AREA 551-454-0002 Z� ALL GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED(EARTHYWRK FlNAL UTIlfDES,ANDFlNAL 6600 j 2 GRADING)BY THE MILESTONE DATE IN PROJECT DOCUMENTS. M1 sam�wq mazer.iM uM1 mnupr.mW aEEw prr�eM nrWw,n a MMn.Writ of�x M1 M1tnaWW r+Y to MW W—pu.pu.ala Glut mE—W Wm pnprW6 RWm W nW EYp.Pr HM1Na w M%bwm —WW WNMruWWm and ofttu H nftk, WH m and AmW, t^WM,"M WWt JUBW y m WYnNyHSW and A--t- m m 00 m w DD 00m CO ED 00 00 l 0 CO 0 l 0 w 0 l 0 0 0 0 ED 0 o O1 o m oED o p Er to N I I o l.4 AM o o 44 +0 878". �p 78.8 {.p 878.6 ,. ± 878.4 O 878.84 N v 87688 O 878.A3 �0 877.82 n O N c w o o N NO N O .. .. ! li wo g' $j o _ w >a l� O o ,.r o o {o o No o I o OJ OD 0Om p0p� O J E0DE Go Om pmptD (cO O O O O O O O O O O O p p o m �mz�r mZ o'm 8 mNm� D� v�om� 81o c IF AmNro oil rz oz-01 AND Z-ni A 'D ,A>m m DO' A2rr-v m Onm my >Arm� ��mm O 3z _ � p z m O 0 OmDzZ z �ATOT.0 m O x O Q Qm yOy� 40 y0- mml-m y Oomz Zo O101 Z. Ze -ma R y o CENTRAL PARK WEST-UTICA AVENUE SCAB Cn.ZI W I HEREBY REPORT WAS D PREPARED BY WE OR UNDER WY DI CT W o 2S-E, IMPROVEMENT PLANS CROSS omcNo ByBMW SU—SOWO E5a1NF0 NAT MSX TMEY LAWS OF E STATE K�mley>�Horn p '9 N ST.LOUIS PARK\GOLDEN VALLEY, SECTIONS GRAM!BY m1ESOTA. S Z MLS zm unasEr ac Wm,4—,�, —' >A g o MINNESOTA �, aY DA E: c3--13-15 CAS G PA1TE .�.A� n A `n DLC RESIDENTIAL WOM NN G ND. 467W n.A No.m No. REVIBICNB DATE X069 o aanaaa auwx �` g _ ea3a-lnoe on6nll� 4NkHl avwis3¢3d � B 838WnN 133Hs • .. _ :,. _. L0099L09L 9 N3W000010 M-N—VO3NOIS31IN 3H1AS(ONIO No 'ON 103rOdd NNId ONV'S3LLf1INT UAHC INV3)03131dAO03801NHWHOLOV81NOOW43N3011V 'Z '''[■l - ! SNOLLV01d103d5311S N31SVW0153435 SllOS303UniSIOWlOS1N00011N3W3OVNVW531VM w. rv' -M�4 _ 31d4 ON008O0NV3OVNNNO'ONIa31VM3031V0030V30IAONd'H3HIVM13MdOSGOItl3d 0NI8n0 SLOZ/£L�£0 -i i ..T SNOLLYd3dOON10VL00NIWtlOdtl3d N3HM'30551 SIHl NOd NOI1tltl3OISN0030fIlONl IItlHS i'A _ 0185.5010VHiN00103(054 SIHI N0031Vd I011NV 390lNOHS N31VMCNn0H0 JO 30N3S35d 3X1 'L m :iMOVHiNOO Ol iZ:13 �••.� -� 0 co -vy l) Z •x ITi m m S mooz-q � • IDD -u q Ir zj � � DCD DD nage ways n H m m < Z m m Cf) 3 03dAla - 3Ad Y � • - - .. 6 534.11 a3AVd � V33A1 a311Yd B� Sp D �Y � i 6 Z Y z- ZAj ,. Ntfld p -n I O d 1011(10 = K x 01 � i C, MR s Ys9g Z C_ ^- - i 3ov-4u s-4mn-LAVId ? >m X HON38 DOOM WO1sno ('dAl)313H3NOOAVH9 o �rf3�-- - - -3NIllOI - - -- -- -- -- - - -- Cg W" I { I I 4 + Soso HON39 DOOM WO1St1O I _ g $ : d j V3W 3RiIVHd 3ALLYN I ('dAl)038 lM 4N3U3cvgt1HHS z m S mdmi 108 18W g j �vVd Ntl3Il NDIS 1N3nnNOW Mus 6 AIII N3)RiVd m a 6 1 ¢fx a -tOTtINL' - R. $ 3uruva m31VM a n Q 2000-b34-I99 V36V A110 NIMl Zy 4 SN193B NOIlOndilSNOO 3x0339 - ..- ,.�- �+ ('dAl1 NHO OMd S3l8V1 'tea F 99L1-Z9Z-008-t 33213 1101 NW � �� y F 3NO IWO 31VIS M3HdOJ � ffll Q � 3arLLV3d SITa LLMYNOA lOV1N00 1SnW S?DiDV2UNOO 7V a'I. JILNflltlOdd03l81SSOd Cd"MON38 s 7 1N3nnN ('dAJ919H0N0O,kVHS 8 i _ - J----- --1 3Nf11N3W3SY3Mfdd ------------ ---- - -�I- 01333 NI 31VO5 OWdY219 �� NIl1N3W3sV3�RIVd - -- - - - -- -- -. - ---- ' .1 --- I � FiL2 ON } O 3dA1 N3AVd 6 DVIL1NO3 NI LON Lim y 3dALLi3AVd (AAA v simn NVRI1S303d 9 I � 9L SL t4 £L ZL LL m 6 8 L 9 S 4 E Z l GRADING NOTES 1. ALLWORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCEWITH THE CITYOFGOLDEN VALLEY AND ST.""$PARK SPECIFICATIONS AND SOILUNG PERMIT ( I I I II \`-• `- I REQUIREMENTS.WORK WITHIN WAY2 TABOULEVARDWILLREQUIRE AMI- 1 PROVIDE STUB FOR FUTURE I � Row/uTal PERMIT. 3 I I 1I DEVELOPMENT.SEE CONTRACTOR TO CALL'GOPHER STATE ONE CALL'AT LEASTTWOMRIONG 1.1.��J DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION FOR UTILITYLOCATIONS.THAN E I I ( I I CENTRAL PARK WEST DRAINAGE 6 UTILITY ^� / I CITIES METRO AREA a51 454-0002 OR TOLL FREE.11U 166 I PLANS FOR CONTINUATION EASEMENT 0. 3. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONSAND UWATIONSOR EXISTING _EE II is tI INV.973.83 ( 1 �.> UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TOTHESTARTOFSIiEGRADING UNDERGROUND FUTURE RESIDENTIAL L THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER OFANY I Z , DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS s I CISTERN OVERFLOW STOOPS AND SIDEWALK SWC DIRECTED aK SLOP TO SD27I O I W / / . To STORMTECH CONNECTION TO PARK J ❑ • i� SUBGRADE EXCAVATION SMALL BE BACKFIL ED MMEDA ELY AF Eft y EXCAVATION TO HELP OFFSET ANY STABILITY PROSIEMS DUE TO WATER INV.873.00 NOT IN CONTRACT.FOR L I O/ /'' TORE ROOF SEEPAGE OR STEEP SLOPES WHEN PLACING NEW SURFACE MATERIAL ADJACENT TO EXISTING PAVEMENT THE EXCAVATON BMA118E flALKFIl1ED BW REFERENCE ONLY. DRAIN PROMPTLYTO AVOID UNDERMININGOFEXISTING PAVEMENT. aw aoa LOT 2 NOT IN CONTRACT �I} CONNECTION I INV:878.00 j 5. CONTRACTOR SHALLSE RESPONSIBLE FORALLHORQOWALANDVERTICAL CONTROL CONTR TOR -- -I - -� -1.--� -I-i e. STORM SEWER ALIGNMENTS.TE DRAINAGE TRENCHES TO FOLLON PROPOSED i e ---_ -_------ --- I STORMS SHOWN ARE FINISHED INTB f Ab.. ---------I T� _ ]. GRAGES EELS ARE FI LEAVE STREET READY FOR TOBABE, ROUGH GRPDE TO O p --�� - - --- ---- --- -----�'��I � ��.--i - --�-- ----- --- --- - --- - SUBGRADE ELEVATION,LEAVE STREET READY FOR BUBBASE, pp CONNECT TO ------ _ ---- --- ----_------- -_ --__ ----- _- e. ATE%CESSMATERIA,BITUMINOVSSURFPOING,CONCREE ENIS,MY _ I _T 15 -UNDERGROUND-- --� T-- - ----- --_--- ~------------- -n- - THE PROPERTYOry REMB,AND OTHER UNSTABLE MATERiAL55HALL BECOME 1�S ^ I ( CH ------ I - -------- �- ------ ---_--_-- CONSTRUCTION.ITEHE CONTRACTOR AND SHPII BE DIBR]BED OF OFFTHE < �T i - p�� ----_- �. - ----- -------------------- "• DE f r - I ------ - 8. REFER TO THE UTILITY PLAN FOR SANITARY SEW5R MAN.-TER MAIN SERVICE C 3 I I -- --� 03 .- I + �. CONNECTTOm LAYOUT AND ELEVATIONS AND CASTING/STRUCTURESCHEDULE. UNDERGROUND r� O 10. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PAVEMENTS AND CURB 961A 3D-2A `� CISTERN �•T /�/ ��./� �I AND GUTTER WITH SMOOTH UNIFORM SLOPESWITH PROVIDE POSITIVE s5•••/i PROVIDE STUB FOR FUTURE Y i <�I1' Y mT I �..... yl �� . ORAIN/•r;E. 6 `�:_.� ��SEE DETAILS. DEVELOPMENT.SEE CENTRAL PARK $� <a t j CO-1/ I 11. INSTALLAMINIMUMOF4'MNOOTCLASS5ACGREGATEBASEUNDERCURBAND u s I iI I I OUTFALL FROM T �� / / WEST PLANS FOR CONTINUATION I GUTTER, w I UNDERGROUND I / I INV:873.05 \ // // I 12. HAUL ROUTESHALLBEWAYZAYTA80V LEVARDANDGAMBLEDRIVETOPARK OO wa 1 I u =�< STORMTEyF-I UNDERGROUND GJICF{I\ 'I \ ��-._ _ / iy! -- - - Imo- - - - - - PLACE BOULEVARD TO HIGHWAY�1. <obj. e M -`SEE DETAILS. - - SEE LINEAR PARK DETAIL I \ �'- -�/ T i. +3. UPON COMPLETION OF EXCAVATION AND FILLING.-TRACTOR SHALLRESTORE u3 < SHEETS OI a O ; \ / _ ALLEGSTREETS ATED HCIT BEDAREAS DONSITE.OVER. RBEDAREAS SHALL BE 3 I I \ LINEAR PARK / 1 i RE VEGETATED W TH CIT APPROVED GROUND COVER a � 3 D$j I UNDERGROUNDDETENTION � I / /) =�o€ a= H - I % / I , 4. CONTRACTOR IS TO PLACE ALL MANHOLES OUTSIDE OF DRIVING LANES U _ I SEE LINEAR PARK DETAIL SHEETS .ice' / I , d LIMITS OF a NN \ 1 y _ r - �l /w II GRADING LEGEND 3e_ ° f 81112 i. W - - ure PROPERTY clTv LIMIT UNE 'r. I sa _ b o EXISTING CONTOUR - ---I-- ----- .............. PROPOSED CONTOUR mm m 0 S I ' STORMWATER EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER _ LLL(gggt]]] < 3h TREATMENT L EXISTING BUILDING � 5 EASEMENT PRWOSEO STq M SEWER%PE Z CONNECTTOI _X Q UNDERGROUND EXISTING STORM BEWER PIPE I I ___-__- W J yPPoPoSED CAAOING PoDGELIPE/SWgIE i STORMTECH OUTLOT A �II SEE DETAILS. ® PROPOSEDMANOLE p i I INLET DLURfl`ARFA a- Z 11 INET I E L PROPOSEDSIPHONICMANOE 8 IF { I XXX% P-0SEOSLOPE /L<rL Q v< I I I PROVIDE 21'STORM rc-&-,l PROPOSED STORM SEWER STRUCTURE LABEL < z EM ERGENCYOVERFL000ELEVATION N I ; STUB TO FUTURE Ea w IDEVELOPMENT I FFE FINISIfOFLOOR ELp EVATN �+ INV:873.70 - TC TOP OF CURB J Q FL CURB FLOW LINE HP HIGH POINT W }r HP ee eP M a �. W W a f DRAINAGE SCHEDULE U Z JLUQ INVERT PIPE PIPE INVERT PIPE PIPE c STRUCTURE STRUCTURE/ RIM/GRATE PIPE0 � d❑< ' t NO. CARTING TYPE ELEVATION ELEVATION SIZE SLOPE ELEVATION SIZE SLOPE PIPE MATERIAL 6 IN IN IN OUT OIFT OUT (PUBLIC)PRIVATE) Z 0 O W SO, OCS 582.20 SB]2.W 21' 1.88% W87].00 21• 428% PUBLIC RCP Ii.!W �W Q E 73 1S tcax ALL CONTRACTORS MUST CONTACT 3 LU y SU1 MH 882.18 W 8735] 18' 1.D0% PUBLIC RCP >i GOPHER STATE CALL ONE Z w J NE 872.84 24" 0.50% s0-z MH ea+.7a sw 5]1z3. 24• DSO% Pueuc RCP MN TOLL FREE 1-800-252-1166 E 8]1.23 18' 0 50% a U BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS Q ••-L J SD-2A• MH 881 S5 Nese ao 24• 1sOw TWIN CITY AREA 651-454-0002 d adc cn ❑ W SW 3 00 18' 0.5016OBS 888.22 24' 1.50% NCP E8787G 0 j SO-] MH 881.56 3.00 1e' 8S.137- 24' 050% PUBLIC RCP i 6 SD4 MH 882.03 Na73.58 18' 0.5096 Ea73.59 +8' 050% PUBLIC RCP J T a$ NORTH SDE MH 881 45 W M. 18' 088% PUBLIC RCP IZ 8 SD7 CB aw.w E 872.23 8' 0.50 6 W 87223 18• 0S_ PUBLIC RCP U SD-12• MH 882,9t we7e.0 24• +s+w ALERT TO CONTRACTOR: DATE SD-18• MH 882.02 NE 8]1.14 24' 0.50% 03/13/2015 D a GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 1, THE PRESENCE OF GROUNDWATER SHOULD BE ANTICIPATEDON THIS PROJECT CONTRACTOR'S BID 9p6 G 10 20 40 'REFER TO LINEAR PARK GRADING DETAIL BHEETa FOR INFORMATIONONCONNECTIONSTONIDFROMUNDERGROUNDDETENTION-DCISTERNSYSTEMS. SHA LL INCLUDE CONSIDERATION FOR THIS ISSUE.WHEN PERFORMINGGRADINGOPERATIONS PROJECT NO. DURINGPERIODS OFWETWEATHER,PROVIDE ADEQUATE DEWATERING,DRAINAGE AND GROUND 160755001 WATER MANAGEMENT TO CONTROL MOISTURE OF SOILS.REFERTOMASTERSITESPECIRGATIONS. SHEET NUMBER 3 2, ALL GENERAL CONTRACTOR WOR K TO BE COMPLETED(EARTHWORK FINAL UTILITIES,AND FINAL GRADING )BY THE MILESTONE DATE IN PROJECTDOCUMENTS. 692 J dOl S�I`dl3 a WINMIS32i Old Z. P� 9°`w °Y°SYN Yl CI SD 3vo S1WABmM3q �cJbrNl`dbQ ` IOS3NNIW bZ3M M e"r T'.Laeu�� 3rurd srvm r//�� /,y//�,� ',+` —NN,N 1° AY rr�aaD iA3lTdA N30100\)12Md sinoi'1S wM w n= c) UJOH \Y/ ajwi� �vA ta3xi�An maYAn uo i"elY m s Bi Deis SlW Ae a3 nme { '8 JN I4bZi J SNb�ld 1N3W3AOadWI a tl°Y°Ya° 1tlB•Ya 3 BY laN 1BY3°.B3tlJN a31ON Stl � yl�yd �Ib'3 N 11 mN3"voun-1S3M ANVd IVHIN30 o w,lf9'43M°3M�1�mBlt�'t l�3fntltl'Y � mis :wxrdo SL'Bti :31a° ,+•.�ul.wuwr�•.�m�oryrv�..z `w LL N°3Ho m V1OS3NNIW'A31'IVA N30100 ttre su WPl "O �--- 'oY ni,....°.P�N<..a 1S3M NNtldltlil1N30 NOIwIYos3° rBl°rw° n3n aw3nYA BrB, V10S3NNIW k311VA N30100 1S3M_'j IVNIN30 Naultl°s3D Nro vena n3Y c ° Mti a R d w r W S 8333 s `,$ pLL' 8z F 5 "-'� _ Z �� g "� �° s mg a�lei Alm ME Ia n `s zag x i Y °s �aw �� Q x� d a � a Z a rc a3 = 8 m --- --- _ w co ---- u 3 °2 � .I — — —I :JI — -- ----Is Sg SYS g G § a s d Aga r - a. r`as 2Y - kk w g 98 �y os�.x::swa :�axags x�� `"btl 1$ � YenmmEeEaa �66m66G�8�Yl PH y L z SM o g°as s _ v 4�3> Via@ pS q� Fww.a �w8^gg �,� e oats y <w W yaw "a° �_ :.;' W pyo ° > wg a� k, 95 K?4 �� `o o ._ jign a ¢ g3E� x° w ; w 3z cd W S g " fWW n ° wyp� ts axe " w o21 v r.;°�5 =x4Qwx 3 =e< x "N ° - 's° m Y, g°Qwg� eE 3°x . o�»fit. Paz o°;-i 15 O�°8 xgg ' 2 ?�i > °b 3 jgffla 0i uy=wx m2o �a �� S �r aa' g= �m� w � 3e� � ° � o Wog�oo °o� s" w 8 6 g< ��w "��a� gEo 5a 7°8 o s'azaYx�n$C o� gxgf! $�� 3xxa z a�ti�=ik M-1. tu ��zSgm S ° o u.°� o tlN5WAYtl° BS'8t'L .,iy ' wr t V10S3NNIW•A311VAN ,3010<J urAsttiaiumBL 3 o d � �� 1S3M NilVd lVil1N30 w'�re inwB�B',anv °O� � 4 � ; w � , � YwwYae3o awo Aow naY 12 F € q� _ yy _ o w T Ito $ �� 2 offi .l u9� `` Nil i "a� S 96. >" o �a u a) � 8 ay Q s� SYS y ; is q< `s9 4 � �a a � e o �3 .e Lu >Z- _ w $ t. �- 8 '� �O o ki 3 W V° 3 @k S 3 W > z Z gyy a 2 g fat - g s0 ¢ 8' e s = \\ g y ' x r Y z m � � oy < ao bi o 3 H w < m i Q- Ja _ _ N m s ig Y f J Q w cr w � i ~ C)z � � � o tyea _ Oyu g� w< $ H Nuj 1 21 x a5 p Mwg01OZmw LL o 'S° LL a 4 $ e 6" iq pw W W W s °3'a� �xgLL amE� ; w O y tlt w8 a �S4 �o� 3 Q —T _ m o W Yx L) �e a e ' o Q Hm H_ saw s 4w $ a Q > oxo ams SyR. s " P w �" � �4 ®� g� Ws 1.6 oe .e$ ssg a "'sW �m „sa 4 a 4go top U) _ N ” " m zz 'aul•rol°puroy pw uoyi-.NIWM vi(LILV91 LroVIM W IPY�W MIR�...V Vw ucN-L.IWM FO wn.idePP Bw wnogoNro u.LYr l.nV1M iw•wnaop.1Vi w cugN�wM4>w lP.rroY 4.�.b.P.N wIW b!iuNP Vu°.etl�r!ayla>.w rot A,w P.- ------------ NW4 N'a1�M 1u.wuN4 w.s'wwV P1uw.uE.u61wy yio.itloum KB Cpl.aYYM1q'iw•wiv°P.IVL arblal�3n o d0, J IV[iN3aIS3N 010 u�-o�wa� sBL9r oH yn nn DI-Ct-cD ova Ae m�3lq 1(V��U ��l V N I V a a � �! 3N.yd a svom ViOS3NNIW o i o T •� �,� S,W ^tl»��do '8 E)N I a b21 J '.l311VA N301091 ANdd sinoi'1S o UJOH((� lw'`■ 3t..u:G'nHnilaHn uo in eltl11. aiu sevllxa d ie SlW AS a3eos3a r H /yl SNV]d 1N3V0AO'idW1 _ � m Honv�wa3da•Hl,a�n�..„�w„m,>,E3mn MON Sv dCj b�N I 1 3f1>QJN3/1H d011fl-1S3M)IbVd l`dZIlN30 3rx o YlOS3NNIW'A3l�VVA N30100 UJ u..cu- 1S3MN2'V11I 11N30 nourtloalD r�Mtla n3a wwrmv3nei Devi sD o C 1 o� �41 p _ ss� ❑la!&I$II�IFISIQ�'Qs 3 W w uai �s` €E"s „g o5w aE_ 51..9 g � mgl� l@I@184Is' MI & MA -x13A As I gig cP 0 0o is01 =3a 8P HIM 2 Is J _ 092 H - - - _ H pQ p «y E w uo.a3H�3Ho��,�'aaw:�uarom„ � nra aw,vna sr!rc-! 3iva "�Im. ..• w O V1053NNIW•A3110'A N30100 air.crimesmalM 1S3M N21Vd'1Vtl1N30 noua�D HHo utln �� wv nvrvanHi orae z� 89 W lV "g "J Uf Ea 'i-_c _ wtWW'yE � • Z O �UF LL ¢�2V Um b ¢ _ —_ guy` €j ZZ U ! b a -- Of J rc � O h - g= z=l 0 " ~ c w � pE d 4y8 ' Irc_J Z o %Z N O gip Ao 'ui' ' a3s lip fl. Q "' o yl $ N � w „ � E Yep Rd. M o a 8 ti b" „ eg TH jiflzffY 8' r-A � ZT. OSw ! o „ a F - o cul'agaPPwV P!P PPIF�IWII Dtlw9P11 YAaYlN.P IPM cul yPiPPP..V Pw ucH--ryWN FV WlaimpP Pw wryoyc,pro wiy=.t�PVIM iw•wmq yy!w ouq P�,.tlad,y puP rP.mtl 9.�.+d.PP it WIW+W i1MP puo..Pdlltl aylab.ip=y FPo pyuµ4 y bN.wµlwwy.4 w.e'4.wY Miw..uE euEPD Duo y�„+wa Wi 41�+.YYbP1'tww�ovp.lyy 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 J A 1 e 6I F � NORTH .. B LIGHTING LEGEND GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET ? ✓1 G 10 2040 CITVBOVNDR-LIE LOT 1 NOT IN CONTRACT PROPERTY/ pN NE B <z /T 5 3■� F I �. p.J7a � s: _ oL w .0 b.0 t.0 t.0 b.0 t.0 b,0 t. t.0 b.0 b.0 b.0 1t.1 b.1 .1 b.i t.2 4 b.4 b.2 b.1 b. t.1 t.1 to .o to to to o t.0 to o to to b.D to b. b.o'E.o b. .a b to b.1 b. b.1 b b.1 b.1 t. b.i b t.3 b.x t bA"11. .3 b.2 b. b .6 b3 t. b.1 ti to to Q. O Qo 1 .0 t.0 t.0 b.0 t.0 b.0 to t. to t.l t,1 t.1 I 1 .] .1 .1 ti t.1 t, t. .1 .1 .1 .1 t.2 t3 5 .] s t.9 t.2 t. t 1 .1 .1 bA to t.0 to A 0 .0 .0 t.0 t.o t.o t.0 t. t .0 .0 to b 1 1 .1 .1 t.1 t 1 .1 .1 .1 b.l t 1 .2 .a t .4 .3 .3 .a .9 i i .0 .a .Z t.1 b.i to to .0, _ b.a-t.4- 1I . .., .. y $YyYy} /r717 S S a A to to t.l ti t.l ti t. I. _ 77 U7 17 77 .1 2• .s t.2 .14 t.1 .ob. 4 C W .o to b.l ro.1 b.1 b.2 t.2 t b.i b.i t.2 b.2 t3 tw ba t.2 t.x t.2 b. 2 b.3 b. b.3 t.3 t.9 .a 1 3 .1 .a t.7 t.77.�{�tb..tjj b.2 b.2 b.2 ro.1 b.l b.l t.1 t.3 b.1 t.1 b.1 t.1 b.1 b.i b.1 ti t.i t.1 b.1-ba b. t.1 b2 2 .2 b.2 10 b .0 t.1 ti t,2 t .3 3 b.� 3 t t.6 S A t./to t, t. i.s i.9 t. t.a t.3 t.M b.3 t.4 t.3 t3 t.2 t.1 t.l t3 t3-U .2 t3 t.l t'l 11.1 b.1 t.1 t.1 t.1 t.1 t.�t.2 t.3 .3 t.3 t3 .s .0 i.7 .9 .6 .3 a i.]!i.9 t. t.4 t.2 t.1 17.3 3 t.4 t.4 A t.9 to t.3 t.4 t. t. a t.3 t.2 t.2 t3 b 3 t.2 t.2 t i b.i ti b.i ti t.2 b.! to t.7 t.9 b3 .8#.3 t. I S b.3�.2 t.2 t.3 to t.3 t3 t.2 b.2 b.3 t.3 t3 t.2 b.1 ba t.l t.o t. 0 i. ]t.1 .v .s b.fi S t.4 t.4 iA .7#, t, to t.3 t.3 t t. to t.2 t3 t.1 t.1 t.l t3 t.2 #.3#.6#. t. tb`. 4.0 I. .a t. .2 t.2 t3 to t.4 t.3 t.3 t3 t.l t.l t.l t.1 t.l t.l t.l .0 .3 '!. s bS bS b.4 b.s 2 .9 .6 t.4 b # -4"9 6 ro.3 t.2 b.2 1.1 b.2 b.2 t.3 .2 b b, b.e bA ro.2 b.i t.1 ro.l rot b.2 b.2 b2 b.i b.l t.1 t.i t.1 b.l ti b.l t.l b.l b.0 b.0 ro.0 b.0 bA 6 t.4 t s .9 9 . i. t t.4 b.Z b.2 b.z t.2 tJ t.4 i.3 A .2 .a y4 .s t.4 t.2 t.3 ti t.l b.1 b.l t.1 ti ti t.1 ti b.l ti t.i t.1 t.o to to to to to t.0 to t.a L' .r b. b t.s b.4 ,fi .0 1 .6 t.4 t. .6 ro. b.s t.4 t. b. # #.a # t.4 b3 t.3 t�f"{.3 to to #.6. 1#. b .3 t3 t.3 t.3 t3 b3 tl t.i ti to ti t.l ti ba bLa ba t.l to t.0 to t.0 t.0 t.0 to t.0 to to t.0 t.0 t.0 to .p5 r € 14 t.4 t.3 LINEARP R is t.1 t.a .6 .3 3 .4 to t t.4 1.3 t,4 b i.s A 8 1.1 1.3 1.4 .6 1b.9 .a t.3 t.2 t.2 t.2 t.2 ti t.1 t.l t.l ba t.0 to t.0 to to t.0 to to to b.0 to to t.0 to to to to to to to to 114 -p S T D 8 #3 t, t.6 t.s t s t.1 tS t3 t.i t.2 t.2 b.2 2 t.2 t.2 b. t.3 b.3 t3 .6 1 6 t.4 t t.4 t�3 t.3 to 6 t a t.4 to 0 ifA b 3 t3 b r �1 itl t 1 bTYi to ifb 11.0�3ba t3 iG6 t3�3 118 t d i<d iFO�A O ifb t3$o 0.0 'n t d g 3 i .6 .1 1 .6 t.l t.3 t.l b.x t3 ti t.]ti t.3 .1 t.1 t.l t.l b.i t.]t.1 b3 t3 b. t.a t.2 t.3 t. t.7 # bA t.3 t.a t.2 2!t t. 3�t.1 t3 t3 b.4 t. 3. #. It.6 .2 t.1 b.l t.1 ti b.3 1 t.1 t.1 t.l t.l t.l t.l t.1 t 'b ba t.2 t3 t3 S t.3 t.2 t.2 t.2 t1 t.2 t.7 2 t.2 t.2 t.2�7 S qB .S i. to t.1 ti t.l 1 t.1 t.l t.3 t.l t.1 t.l t.l t.3 t.2 .3 t t.a .1 t.3 t.2 t.2 t.2 b.i 3� .a �4` 3 2 2 t.1 t.l t.l 1 .1 b1 t.l t t. .2 t.2 .2 t. t. .4 t. .2 t.2 t 2 t2 .3 t3 to #. _ 3 t.2 t.2 t.zt.z t o b.x t o t.3 .3 .5 0 8 .3 .9 .1 t. .3 t{2.t.9 .>i .9 .6 .S i � � Q �� I mNSRz o 6 t.2 t I0,3 t. #.6 4 6 t. t. t.3 t. bA .6 t t bA E b t.l t. .3 t. F ata 3'!.7 3.{V t.7 t. i b. #2 .6 t.4 t. .3# 5d .6 �� a t.6 t. a #. i. .�t.s .s 614 t.� A _ J -b.Lt t.Z t. t.a .0 is .1 is t .2 . at.itA i.S t.9tLt.�.3f3 t.9 t. .3t Z Tm qQ0 j 5 J ,vc. L - Z LLI Z �. F 6 OUTLOT A O 1 LL 1 LL d 1 p H fi I Q ULJ v z 0 GO i sWest End Projectl.AGI 1/29/2015 _ � slcructLlra a Luminalro Schedule Project:3TH Lighting Alliance g Symbol Qty Label Arrangement Total Lamp Lumens LLF I Demwiptlon 38 H SINGLE N.A. 0.950 7208LED ILL! J > J Calculation Summary Q Q 3 H b Project:7TH Lighting Alliance V ZZQ Z J c 3 Label CaleType Units Avg Max Min Avg/Min Max/Min - „--,- =a Q F parking and Ped area Top Illuminance Fc 0.80 3.4 0.0 N.A. N.A. r J H Z e Pathway area Illuminance I Fc 10.62 13.5 10.0 1 N.A. I N.A. r",` y, uj Z 0 N p LUzw _ Yz_ Ix LIGHT POLE&FIXTURES fl `i J I a= a s fn o B 2 FC(FOOT CANDLES) NOTE: REFER TO UTICA AVE IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR LIGHTING E ADJACENT TO SITE. 0J 1PMr'.x' I {!F 1 FC s L ALERT TO CONTRACTOR: DATE § ALL CONTRACTORS MUST CONTACT 1. S ALLINCLUDEOFGROURATION ORSHOULD BE THIS ISSUE. IENPEDOIMINGGRADING OPERATIONS 03/13/2015 LgxNnoae�xsTxnaNkarm \`.aw.r.ua ! (; 03/13/2015 - Y GOPHER STATE CALL ONE SHALL INCLUDE CONSIDERATION FOR THIS ISSUE.WHEN PERFORMING GRADING OPERATIONS I II {} 8§a O,6F(: DURING PERIODS OF WET WEATHER,PROVIDE ADEQUATE DEWATERING,DRAINAGE AND GROUND !� II roe. F` PROJECT NO. MN TOLL FREE 1-800-252-1166 WATER MANAGEMENT TO CONTROL MOISTURE OF SOILS.REFER TO MASTER SITE SPECIFICATIONS, I' K BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINSE ¢�j l�D �,tf 160755001 TVWN CITY AREA 651-454-0002 2, ALL GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED(EARTHWORK FINALU-EE,AND FINAL - .. 3 SHEET NUMBER GRADING)BY THE MILESTONE DATEINFROJECTDOCUMENTS. PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN LIGHTING I.2 6905 azva Hdl Nb_1d WiN30I63b Ola u; wa u DDYfL 'oY�n Hn Dli't-CD 31rD A9 a3=W In K •� �� H3NnWH•d OWL V10S3NNI1N o z o 18 Cfl ..DH 1. was AS wvma db�Sa Nb� ',k311Vn N3a109 1 MWd SIf101'1S <. N - Z �� O ujoH�<<Aapr �V1„ro „�a °� „e'm m vs"�„'�a Yd N�rAe m'n�s3D SNVId 1N3W3A021dW1 �� tl0 NOLLV�IfI°3�'NVId 9HL 1VHl A!LLl13]AH31pH I M a = W 311,E Ni ]Vd �Ib3 N I_l anN3AV V011fl-1S3M Ji21Vd 1V211N3O N J ---------------------- UZtO W U J Nm01 _ z n d R E ou lot ♦ F •., -. ° . 1. -- Z WInH I Dm - Q ..... ... x � =o v _ xv W 'Oz'� mss° LLI OHQ "� <�_ w — q _ . I a __ ° r � ...._ OON= D�I �I M Uow +',k I„ wm r 111 t� *`+ I ~'w' III w of N . ( j � d;,�.:•I:T:; � mw � mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm { LU ZI. +h - w 55 RD � to to b c+ Fo i9 Io t� tv H tv EY H N to b b ++ Z { w owl Wa z U Z yr p a g {aDJ 2 8 a q� Yyj J ri " a § v W /� ¢ ❑ 'Y i + w �— v M i w — -- f ` � �,� �❑ �� •�� azo ,� OD +I g as �❑ �' � ria � E,�::� .. ... ..... .. , +++ is eY+ t I + +I g C + + o I G +++I+' + Y F � I i Q I I�+ III❑❑ZN�� ,J W +I + , = a LLLLWII z J S� z_ z z m❑ O m W ❑ r zo q w qq oma¢% 'j µfiat& m ' S F � : t�� w ❑ �ii< �� a Z. YG Q p k i $ �qq�5 N i -+I++ I, s YF�6 IaLLy z _ � + + W m O �LLm �' I W �❑ 8 m o 8 om W F; pmy0 . i. �,$%, W � y O; Z� � �o vii❑ .Il.. /1..La9d ++ - ❑3 o> r" Om <W g o o Q < ' - - ----— NVId 3dVOSONVI 3nN3AV • • • • — — o W z aVu 4 VOan NO-A 00r9 133HS 3M—_ — _. = _- S 8 a m 3NnH31Vr4 v w 6 6 ul'ro]vPvroY D'o uoH-A.IWM W�YN41 4vvVIM W IPM cul M4+—V Dlc ucN�vIWN FV uollvlmvv Duo uogopgylro uq}Ir 1roY1M iu.wnavp qV{uo lu�tivgy Duv uwY 1v�tivN.e+N Y+1'M bl lw•IP D'<Dotl�b aµab.N q�M DVDW4.1 byrA y.u.ury.Y a M.�V Pluwutl vuElwD Duo gdeum wP �yNOv�7iwwrooD v1Vl a 0] U W u. W00'NaOH-A31VOI'M '3144 L6L4-949-L99 3NOHd S I�Z/Z�'/Z� 41LSS NW'lnVd'1S AB 03NO3HO O O m r N9 z 311ns'is 3M 3AV AlISa3AINn OSSL to Nxvaa 1181 HX3 J N Ni f l ` IVI1N3O1S3�1 Old 839PInN 3SN30n NN s-W-AN NA3lVA N30109/AHVdsin l '1So�\N Wa�o z & wN Lu svom >ionu 3ovEnjvo A�'�'V lS3M)*JVdld JlN30 UaOH /� :833NION3 NOIS30 31V0S o 0 Fo w LL Z Yf) Q O �\ U I� d N Q U P ♦ low N Kam �? ch O M l y F co C i ,. I \ ir . I C 4� o 0 ED m `—' I 1 "3 I r �r❑- Q• I I I ! I 3; N I I I I I I . I i . yr --- --- --- — ------ I ( � "" `%d -�• }, a. 7 k 1 ,' ..rel m I fl L_ 4::16. N. L co Yn I ( 1 41 a � ;1 I �4 /I 1 �• I . --------- L--- ------- ------ J / —— —— �� J v Pr C)0) r , N N U? O° a n L U C Ja O rn 'sajDPPaaY Pue vnH—zP1uPN vl R11YVgI lvvV11M ay IPVz j tl Puo u wIN R9 uollvlavPv puv ua lozUVVlro wlzl+a 1PaY11M 1PbwnaaP c wl Puo rey pauoCa //(/ 'Q sv VaIW zy lugP DUP as NM a aVl luP PaPuayul•'.�.u.a 0 1u su61-P Puv s Q m U W X — _ G) T m o I 7 I00 <—d r m< o o ..e 01—m . n:1 R....r d.c1.tl.� A... mc.—1 .nm I.ellr, KI—Y-1.11 «.m.. o �Fj3,cn CE k �o c f o _f .p n O ro O r I� --------J— \\ I. \ _ ------- 1 ' w t I I I I II� 44 I I I A I I I I I I C I I I k I I I 1 �1 . b I % 1 I II a4 a4 a4 I ;R , I .7 V .I „1 WT _ XI co _ o : I r I I I I I I ❑ -11 I I EO ° m ❑ 0 � I i T Q•, ❑. ❑.�.I I -° - ,k I I I � I N / w I � I \ \ o L_ r—j I I I I I I I I cT N� on z \ cn m m 0 0 SCALE DESIGN ENGINEER: m m c' op CENTRAL PARK WEST BUS DESIGNED BY Kimley>>>Horn 0 0 _ yy LUCAS C. PAYNE X z N> ST. LOUIS PARKIGOLDEN VALLEY,MN DRAWN BY DO 2. N� TURNING EXHIBIT —SAES MN LICENSE NUMBER 2550 UNIVERSITY AVE WEST,SUITE 238N N m o 0 o DLC RESIDENTIAL CHECKED BY 46785 ST.PAUL,MN 55114 PHONE: 651-645-4197 DATE:02%02/2015 WWW,XIMLEY—HORN.COM WDD'N21DH-A3lWIN'MMM '31V4 L6*-91,9-199 3NDHd S��Z/Z�/ZD p4cft- Lr) bIISS NW'lflVd'1S 58L9y A9 03NO3HD �HIlNDdiS�b�l4 O p W M NBfZ 3LID5'153M 3AV AliSN3A1Nf1 0SS2 y3gWfIN 35N3Dii NW $�Y•r- �N Z C, A9 NMYND ilGIHX3 JNIN2jni ��L,Ln Ln I M B 03N71530 11.J(1�1 �al� NIN'A3-IIV�N9M00 QAVd Slnol "1S o\u x H 3NAVd svDni o o W Ua0 �� 1 lS3AA N2]dd IVHINdo � a`° = w ' !)I 2133NON3 NDIS30 31YD5 O N - W W W Z _ s <� O M A /� \p, y, � U.) t _. i-4 \ '� AyVA wy L; lk' v Li ❑ .❑ ��a o❑ Llm El - �• II I FIR ❑� �� I tt$1, } L ;; t.. r - I FITTR rl 116#, I '�: ya• I < V I /�__.-_. 'fj l.. $Via:; t ♦ )Lr :.*.. � � ..0 > ., � !_. If II -i Y�. h, 1: �1 if co � Il N �1 n Il t/ i \ '• 1 _.. I I 1 I I I 1 1/i v � fu °-=-I LI v -------r--- co L —— r i1 h / p w ao to-t CN t. / I ) orb-rr�irrriivrr�wiml :! a O Q Un m I `) N o (D 'f} D, (n �F--1(n --I r-j 1 o r .I aul'valPlaowY Puo unH�(vIwIN PV Fila4gl iro411x a9 IlPye aul'vvlol>wvY P uwHJ.vIUNN F4......1'.Puo uollPi4v4iro uvlVl,x iro4ll*1...-.p clVl ua auq P:+v ,di Puo lP-U 4xmtlaatl Q it 4ax ol lualP PuMC7Ulavtiv-41+oFNa wV Pviuwutl¢u61wPuo ctiva ' woP¢I4 m U W LL 2 — Y ADO'NaOH-A31AIAm SIOZ/ZO ,O: " 1679-549-199 :3NOHd VIM9 NH'IOVd'1S S8L9b A9 MA03H3 O O ptr) NWZ 311OS'1S3M 3AV A1KN3AINO OSSZ lb�IlN341532i Ola z O s V OWN 3SN33"NW 5 - 1181HX3 JNINbn i �� m "B""tl"° NW'A311VA N34lOE)5RJVd sinoi as <- X U.I�H<xAa�I l)j ,N>vd sv�m M Ae°3rvs3° �i�f12�1llNfl ��JNIS 1S3MANVd-IVNIN3O o a° N w �7 dMNUN3 NOIS30 31yos O _� -- IF W LL Z UN -ITT N U S� aN Q O I I _ F V i 1.�. ❑ .❑ Er. - 0 ED o ED_ r I I "" I I I • I I I I I . I f L sed I — � Yom` ,•'�j' •IP,.I '.T•� i O' R I IS!',t'..' C® I I�-L�--I� ,t c II I 11111111TM11111 a a I II I ..FF 1 •. � b If f I Gr it"A e 00 ( f I I I I e I 1 I, I A I b• i I r:, I ' l I 1 F yl LO I 4 1 I l I f�j I 1 I kl I I ILL I Yl 4 I f co \ — '/ ———————— / v ----- o 000°D O ! f I 0000(D f V N o E O O H O O V O 0 QC C O In �H min V 1 valPlaoesy Pup u+P—(PIwiN of R11peP11—u.a Y 1u putiv7n wp a% asp--1 eu611 pw%Nauoa ay]NV wYN6%•lwwnaeP alYl Q mL) W u. ORDINANCE NO. 550, 2ND SERIES AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE AND THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY Approval of Final PUD Plan of Development Central Park West, P.U.D. No. 121 1400 and 1500 State Highway 100 South, 5075 Wayzata Boulevard, and 1511 Utica Avenue South DLC Residential, LLC, Applicant The City Council for the City of Golden Valley hereby ordains as follows: Section 1. Background. Approval of a Preliminary PUD Plan for a new planned unit development encompassing part of a larger development in both the City of Golden Valley and St. Louis Park, involving the construction of two six-story multiple family residential buildings, a six-story hotel, two 11-story office buildings, a parking ramp and a linear park was approved by the Golden Valley City Council on December 16, 2014. A Final PUD Plan was submitted by DLC Residential, LLC (the "Applicant") in accordance with City Code Sec. 11.55, subd. 6, which has been reviewed by the Golden Valley Planning Commission in accordance with City Code Sec. 11.55, subd. 6.0. The City Council has conducted a public hearing on the Application for the Final PUD Plan City Code Sec. 11.55, subd. 6.P. Section 2. Findings. The City Council has reviewed the Application, Staff Reports and public comment, and makes the following findings pursuant to City Code Section 11.55, Subd. 6(Q) in support of approval of the Final PUD Plan: 1. The PUD plan is tailored to the specific characteristics of the site, such as the proximity to highway traffic and a high retaining wall to the north and east and high-density development to the south and west. With flexibility under a PUD in uses allowed, setbacks, height, parking requirements, number of buildings on a lot, and similar requirements, the quality of site planning and design is of higher quality than if each parcel was designed individually under conventional provisions. By allowing a mix of land uses, the site plan offers the opportunity to live, work, visit, and enjoy outdoor gathering space. The PUD encourages creativity and flexibility in land development. 2. The PUD plan preserves and protects substantial desirable portions of the site's characteristics, open space and sensitive environmental features including steep slopes, trees, scenic views, creeks, wetlands, and open waters. The site is currently used for surface parking and is mostly impervious. Even though existing trees will be removed, the proposed plan adds over 30,000 square feet of public gathering space, over 200 trees plantings, and over 15,000 square feet of shrubs and perennial beds to the site. 3. The PUD plan includes efficient and effective use of the land. The PUD plan provides an appropriate area of the city for high-density office, residential, and hotel uses. The PUD plan encourages development that is sustainable and has a high degree of energy efficiency. 4. The PUD Plan results in development compatible with adjacent uses and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and redevelopment plans and goals. High-density office, commercial, and residential uses surround the site to the south and west. Low-density residential uses are separated from this proposed PUD site by significant highway development. The PUD plan increases housing options, jobs, lodging options, and gathering space to the area. Ordinance No. 550 - continued April 7, 2015 5. The PUD plan is consistent with preserving and improving the general health, safety and general welfare of the people of the City. By encouraging the use of contemporary land planning principles, the PUD plan offers the ability to live, work, shop, and spend time outdoors without reliability on the automobile. The PUD plan promotes pedestrian activity and provides high-quality landscaping additions to the site. 6. The PUD plan meets the PUD Intent and Purpose provision and all other PUD ordinance provisions. The PUD provision permits flexibility from other provisions in Chapter 11 of the City Code. This flexibility is permitted in order to promote the intent and purpose of the PUD section of the City Code. Section 3. Approval of Final PUD Plan. Based on the findings herein by the City Council of the City of Golden Valley, City Code Chapter 11 entitled "Land Use Regulations (Zoning)" is amended in Section 11.10, Subd. 2, and Section 11.45, by approving the Final PUD Plan of Development for Planned Unit Development (P.U.D.) 121. This approval of the Final PUD Plan is subject to all of the following terms and conditions: 1. Conformance to, and inclusion of, all provisions of the Final PUD Plans for Central Park West submitted with the application on February 4, 2015 with revisions submitted on March 20, 2015. 2. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Golden Valley Engineering Division to the Planning Manager, dated March 27, 2015, shall become a part of this approval. 3. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Golden Valley Fire Department to the Planning Manager, dated March 25, 2015, shall become a part of this approval. 4. All signage within the City of Golden Valley must meet the requirements of the Golden Valley City Sign Code. 5. The Final Plat name shall include "P.U.D. No. 121" in its title in accordance with City Code. 6. A park dedication fee of$70,568 (2% of the estimated land value) shall be paid prior to the City's signing and release of the Final Plat and the issuance of any building permits. 7. The Applicant shall submit the remaining 50% ($4,327.90) of the Traffic Demand Management Fee for Lot 1 with the submittal of a building permit application. The Applicant shall pay the Traffic Management Administration Fees associated with each phase of construction, as outlined in the City's 1-394 Overlay Zoning District. The applicant or any future property owner shall adhere to the Travel Demand Management Plan submitted to the City on March 20, 2015. 8. The Applicant shall dedicate easements for public use of certain sidewalks and trails located within the City of Golden Valley, both inside and outside the Linear Park, in a form acceptable to the City Attorney. 9. Because the current Final PUD Plan includes only construction plans for Lot 1 and Lot 2 and concept plans for Lot 3 and Outlot A, the Applicant or future property owner must submit an application for a PUD amendment, and receive approval therefor, when more detailed plans for Lot 3 and Outlot A are prepared, prior to issuance of any building permits for Lot 3 or Outlot A. 10.The City of St. Louis Park approves that portion of the final planned unit development within its jurisdiction. Ordinance No. 550 - continued April 7, 2015 11.The Applicant and all development within the PUD shall comply with all other Golden Valley, state, federal, and local ordinances, regulations, or laws with authority over this development. 12.The Applicant shall enter into a Development Agreement with the City in conformance with City Code and in a form acceptable to the City Attorney. 13.The Applicant shall pay all required fees and costs incurred by the City related to the review and processing of the Application, including legal and professional consulting costs. Section 4. Legal Description. The property encompassed with the PUD is legally described as follows: Outlot A, The Shops at West End. Registered Property Certificate of Title No. 1222619 Lots 2, 3, 4 and 6, Block 4, except that portion of said Lots taken for Belt Line Highway; Lots 7 to 12 inclusive, Block 4, and that part of Raleigh Avenue vacated lying between the Westerly extension of the South line of said Lot 7 and the North line of said Lot 12 and that part of the vacated alley in said Block 4 lying between the Easterly extensions of the North and South lines of said Lot 7 and between the South line of said Lot 9 and the North line of said Lot 11 and that part of the West 1/2 of the vacated alley in said Block 4 lying between the extensions of the North and South lines of said Lot 8 and between the North and South lines of said Lot 12; All in "Kavlis Cedardale" That part of the following described property: That part of vacated Raleigh and Douglas Avenues as shown on the plat of"Kavlis Cederdale" lying between the extensions across said Avenues of the South and West lines of Lot 7, Block 4 and that part of said vacated Douglas Avenue adjoining Lots 6 and 7, Block 4 of said plat lying between the Westerly line of Belt Line Highway and the extension across said Avenue of the West line of said Lot 7, Block 4, "Kavlis Cedardale"; Which lies Northerly of a straight line extending between the Southwest corner of Tract E, Registered Land Survey No. 864, Hennepin County, Minnesota and the Westerly right-of-way of State Trunk Highway 100 passing through a point of the East line of said Tract E distant 18.18 feet North of the Southeast corner of said Tract E as measured along said East line. Registered Property Certificate of Title No. 1012678 Lot 1, Block 4, "Kavlis Cedardale" and that part of the vacated alley in said Block 4, lying East of the center line thereof and between the extensions across it of the North and South lines of said Lot 1. And That part of the North 693.61 feet of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 30, Township 29, Range 24 lying Westerly and Southerly of State Trunk Highway No. 100, also known as the Belt Line Highway. Ordinance No. 550 - continued April 7, 2015 Registered Property Certificate of Title No. 1012734 That part of the South 60 feet of the North 753.61 feet of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 30, Township 29, Range 24, lying West of the Belt Line Highway. Registered Property Certificate of Title No. 1012680 That part of vacated Raleigh Avenue and of vacated Douglas Avenue, all according to the plat of"Kavlis Cedardale" lying Westerly of the Westerly right of way line of State Trunk Highway No. 100 as described in the Final Certificated recorded in Book 412 of Miscellaneous Records, page 148 in the office of the County Recorder and lying Southerly of a line drawn from the Southwest corner of Tract E, Registered Land Survey No. 864 and passing through a point of the East line of said Tract E distant 18.18 feet North of the Southeast corner of said Tract E. Registered Property Certificate of Title No. 1012686 That part of vacated Utica Avenue South, as dedicated on the plat of THE SHOPS AT WEST END, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying easterly of the following described line: Commencing at the northwest corner of Outlot A, said plat; thence on an assumed bearing of South, along the west line of said Outlot A, a distance of 95.16 feet to a corner of said Outlot A and the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence, continuing on a bearing of South, a distance of 81.53 feet to a corner of said Outlot A, and said line there terminating. Section 5. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Sec. 11.99 entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 6. This ordinance shall take effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law. Adopted by the City Council this 7th day of April, 2015. /s/Shepard M. Harris Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: /s/Kristine A. Luedke Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk , 6 M h en MEMORANDUM Valley Physical Development Department 763-593-8095 1753-593-8109(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting April 7, 2015 Agenda Item 4. B. Public Hearing-Amending Section 11.21, Side Setbacks of Principal Structures Prepared By Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager Summary In 2006, the City Council directed the Planning Commission to respond to community concerns regarding the scale of remodeled and infill housing in Golden Valley. This initiated an almost two-year process during which the Planning Commission produced a "Report on Subdivisions and Development" (also known as the "Infill Report") and eventually brought recommendations to the Council regarding building height, side setbacks, and side wall articulation. These changes were adopted in March of 2008. In addition to reducing the maximum allowed height of principal structures in the R-1 zoning district, the side setbacks were modified to vary depending on the height of the home on the lot. As the height of a structure increased above 15 feet, so did the required setback from the side lot line. In order to accommodate existing homes and allow for future expansions, a clause was approved that allowed an existing structure to remain conforming in its current location, while any addition to the structure would be set back as dictated by the new language. Interpretation Based on review of staff reports, Planning Commission minutes, and the video of the City Council meeting at which the changes were approved, a summary of the original intent of the side yard setback requirements is as follows: 1) The singular height of a home is determined by the measurement from the grade at the front building line to the average height of the highest pitched roof or the top of the highest point of a flat roof. 2) Based on a formula that is dependent on the width of the lot at the front setback line, the side setbacks are increased equally on both sides of the home for every foot in height above 15 feet. 3) The increased side setbacks apply to the entire structure for new construction and to any new portion of the structure for additions or remodels. Current Situation At some point in the years since these modifications were made, the method of determining setbacks for additions also became the standard for new construction. This means that instead of the side setback being applied to the entire building, it was applied only to the portion of the building greater than 15 feet in height. In addition, rather than calculating one height for the entire structure (as measured from the front), the height was calculated for each side of the building and the corresponding setback applied to each side independently. The result has been the construction of new homes that have the "wedding cake" shape previously intended only for remodeled homes. After consultation with the City Attorney and discussion with the Planning Commission, staff is recommending that existing language within the Zoning Code be modified to grandfather homes that have been built based on an approved building permit, have an approved building permit, or that have submitted plans for review for a building permit, prior to April 15, 2015. After this date, any new plans will be reviewed based on the original interpretation of height and side setbacks listed above. Attachments • Memo to Planning Commission dated March 23, 2015 (2 pages) • Unapproved Planning Commission Minutes dated March 23, 2015 (4 pages) • Email from Casey Pavek dated March 17, 2015 (2 pages) • Underlined-Overstruck Zoning Code Language (1 page) • Ordinance #551, Clarifying Side Setbacks of Principal Structures in R-1 (1 page) Recommended Action Motion to adopt Ordinance #551, Clarifying Side Setbacks of Principal Structures in R-1. city, of MEMORANDUM valley Planning Department 763-593-8095/763-593-8109(fax) Date: March 23, 2015 To: Golden Valley Planning Commission From: Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager Subject: Zoning Code Text Amendment—Single Family Residential Height and Side Setbacks At the direction of the City Manager, staff is bringing forward the current zoning language related to R-1 height and side setbacks for examination and modification. Recent questions regarding the interpretation of the Zoning Code have necessitated a review of these requirements and the best ways to apply them going forward. History In 2006, the City Council directed the Planning Commission to respond to community concerns regarding the scale of remodeled and infill housing in Golden Valley. This initiated an almost two year process during which the Planning Commission produced a "Report on Subdivisions and Development" (also known as the "Infill Report") and eventually brought recommendations to the City Council regarding building height, side setbacks, and side wall articulation. These changes were adopted in March of 2008. In addition to reducing the maximum allowed height of principal structures in the R-1 zoning district, the side setbacks were modified to vary depending on the height of the home on the lot. As the height of a structure increased above 15 feet, so did the required setback from the side lot line. In order to accommodate existing homes and allow for future expansions, a clause was approved that allowed an existing structure to remain conforming in its current location, while any addition to the structure would be set back as dictated by the new language. Interpretation Based on review of staff reports, Planning Commission minutes, and the video of the City Council meeting at which the changes were approved, a summary of the original intent of the side yard setback requirements is as follows: 1) The singular height of a home is determined by the measurement from the grade at the front building line to the average height of the highest pitched roof or the top of the highest point of a flat roof. 1 2) Based on a formula that is dependent on the width of the lot at the front setback line, the side setbacks are increased equally on both sides of the home for every foot in height above 15 feet. 3) The increased side setbacks apply to the entire structure for new construction and to any new portion of the structure for additions or remodels. Current Situation At some point in the years since these modifications were made, the method of determining setbacks for additions also became the standard for new construction. This means that instead of the side setback being applied to the entire building, it was applied only to the portion of the building greater than 15 feet in height. The result has been the construction of new homes that have the "wedding cake" shape previously intended only for remodeled homes. After consultation with the City Attorney and discussion with the Planning Commission, staff is recommending that existing language within the Zoning Code be modified to grandfather homes that have been built based on an approved building permit, have an approved building permit, or that have submitted plans for review for a building permit, prior to April 15, 2015. After this date, any new plans will be reviewed based on the interpretation of height and side setbacks listed above. Attachments Underlined-Overstruck Zoning Code Language (1 page) z Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission March 23, 2015 Page 7 Kum said the language staff is recomme�iding seems reasonable and consistent with whAtQther communities are doing and it I vill give the Super 8 Hotel an opportunity to expan . Cera suggested iewing a couple diffe ent areas of the parking language regarding events, banquets, an - .estaurants. Zimmerman said stafftvVill review the language pertaining to those uses. Kluchka said he feels comfortable with tfie proposed change for hotel parking. Waldhauser said the expectation is ifrt re is another use, staff would just figure out which parking requirements are corn'patibT'e,,so she doesn't have an issue with leaving the "other uses" language in the hotel`parkii)g requirements. Segelbaum said it is fine to, use staff discretion but banquets and events are uses that can be anticipated so he'd like the languag to be more clear`i9,,,this case.Zimmerman stated that the Planning Commission could ju, t consider the propos� sl,change to the hotel parking and staff could bring back add ional information regardir ther uses, or staff could review oth6r uses and discuss t 6m when this item goes to the,•., ity Council for consideration..°'gegelbaum said he is o`mfortable with the item going to' City Council, but if there are widely different number in staff's review it may be worth br- ing the item back to Planning Commission. MO D by Cera, seconded by Kluchk and motion carried unanimously to recommend a nding the Zoning Code regarding otel parking requirements to 1 space per unit plus rking for other uses. 4. Informal Public Hearing — Zoning Code Text Amendment— Single Family Residential Height and Side Setbacks — ZO00-98 Applicant: City of Golden Valley Purpose: To consider amending language in the Zoning Code regarding building height, side setbacks, and side wall articulation requirements. Zimmerman explained that in 2006 the City studied infill development including height, massing, setbacks, etc. He reminded the Commissioners that they discussed the interpretation of the Zoning Code changes made as a result of the 2006 study at their last meeting and staff now has a clearer understanding of what was intended. He stated that the Planning Commission consensus was that height was to be measured at one spot at the street frontage, both side setbacks would increase the same amount according to that one front measurement, and that this was intended for new construction. He stated that what has been happening since 2006 was a tiered (wedding cake) setback for both new construction and remodels. He explained that one option is to grandfather in existing homes and move forward with the interpretation as intended, or another option is to change the Zoning Code language to match how staff has been interpreting the Code Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission March 23, 2015 Page 8 since the infill development study changes were adopted. He showed the Commission several illustrations showing houses that interpreted the Zoning Code both ways. He added that the text amendment staff is bringing forward at this meeting is language that will grandfather in homes that were built prior to April 15, 2015. Cera asked if there needs to be language added to the Zoning Code to clarify the original intent. Zimmerman said the language doesn't need to be amended if the way it was meant to be interpreted is followed and applied uniformly. Segelbaum questioned if the proposed grandfathering language will apply to all side setbacks in the City. Zimmerman stated that the proposed language will apply to anything that was built with a building permit prior to the Zoning Code changes. Segelbaum questioned what would happen if something was built within a setback area and asked if they would be considered legally non-conforming. Zimmerman stated that legally built structures would be allowed to remain and are considered to be conforming. He said he would get further clarification from the City Attorney. Blum said he would feel more comfortable if the proposed language pointed to the specific ordinance that they are trying to clarify and not include everything built in history. Zimmerman suggested rather than replacing the existing Subdivision 14 maybe the new language should state the dates of January 1, 2008, to April 15, 2015, in order to be more specific. Waldhauser noted that the same language regarding grandfathering was added to the Code in 2008 and questioned what harm there is in saying that everything legally built prior to a certain date is grandfathered in. Segelbaum said there is ambiguity regarding what the Zoning Code was at the time building permits were issued. He added that he is not sure that it is appropriate to change the language regarding structures that were built prior to 2008. Kluchka suggested adding language about variances in the proposed new ordinance. Cera said he doesn't want variances to become Zoning Code language. He wants variances to stay variances. Segelbaum said he's not sure the City knows what was compliant or not at the time building permits were issued, so he would like a separate section of Code addressing this time period. Kluchka opened the public hearing. Steve Schmidgall, 6534 Olympia Street, said he was on the Planning Commission when they came up with the language regarding the increased side yard setbacks. He referred to an illustration showing the potential volume of a structure and said he thought that is what the Commission at the time was proposing. He said mostly what drove the efforts of the past study was unsightly tear downs and re-builds. He added that his intent was to define a buildable volume and that anything could be built as long as it was within the volume area. Steve Shapiro, 219 Meadow Lane North, encouraged there not to be a huge period of uncertainty. He said he knows when the City decided to study subdivisions there was question about what was going to be included and what was not and there ended up being six applications submitted in a midnight charge. He said from what he is understanding there are certain rules, which may or may not have been observed for many years, and now the City wants to really clamp down and make those rules rigid. He Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission March 23, 2015 Page 9 said he wants to make sure there isn't a period where people can run in with their permit applications and they get in under the wink and nod rule. Todd Ereth, 240 Meadow Lane North, said he is encouraged to hear where this is going and is encouraged that the Planning Commission wants to take time to understand the gap period. He said there have been a lot of builds in his neighborhood, some have had the wedding cake shape and some have not. He said there has been some concerns about what the City was trying to do and what the City was approving because some have felt they are conforming and some have not. He said he appreciates the City trying to figure out what truly was conforming during that timeframe. Seeing and hearing no one else wishing to comment, Kluchka closed the public hearing. Kluchka asked Zimmerman about the timing of this amendment. Zimmerman stated that this item and the Subdivision Study recommendations are scheduled to be on the April 7 City Council agenda. If it is ready to go forward the language would be effective upon publication of the ordinance. He added that if more time is needed the conversation could be continued to the April 21 City Council agenda. Cera stated that he came across his copy of the Planning Commission minority report that became the majority report written in 2008 and it was clear how to interpret the Zoning Code language proposed at that time. He said he has a problem with the City continuing to misinterpret the Zoning Code language until April 15. He said people applying for building permits now should be told they have to follow the Zoning Code language as it was intended. Kluchka asked if policies have changed yet. Zimmerman said no, because people have submitted plans based on information given to them from the City. He said the idea was to allow those plans time to get through the building permit process. Kluchka asked if a communications campaign has been started to let people know about the April 15 deadline. Waldhauser said there is no way of knowing who is about to submit plans. Segelbaum questioned if the Planning Commission truly determined the intent of the Zoning Code language. The Commissioners agreed that they have determined that the language has been interpreted incorrectly. Blum said he agreed with Commissioner Cera that the City should not continue to misinterpret the Zoning Code now that the intent is known. Zimmerman stated that the issue has not yet been considered by the City Council, so there is still a question of if they want to change the interpretation. Segelbaum suggested that the Commission discuss amending the proposed language. The Commissioners discussed at length the specific language in Subdivision 11(A)(3), Subdivision 14 and proposed a new Subdivision 15. The consensus of the Planning Commission was to amend Subdivision 11(A)(3) removing the words "any part of," as follows: Side Setback. Side yard setbacks are determined by the lot width at the minimum required front setback line. The distance between any 0 a structure and the side lot lines shall be governed by the following requirements: Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission March 23, 2015 Page 10 The consensus of the Planning Commission was to keep Subdivision 14 as is. (Subdivision 14. Height and Side Setbacks of Pre-2008 Structures. For all existing structures constructed in the R-1 Zoning District prior to January 1, 2008, if the side setbacks and height were compliant with the Zoning Code at the time a building permit was issued, the location and height are considered conforming to current Zoning Code. However, new construction and additions to such properties must comply with current requirements of the Zoning Code.) The consensus of the Planning Commission is to amend staff's proposed language for Subdivision 14 by adding a new Subdivision 15 to read as follows: Subdivision 44 15. Side Setbacks of January 1, 2008 to P�e-April 15, 2015 Structures, Building Permits and Applications. For all structures constructed and building permits issued or applied therefor in the R-1 Zoning District on or after January 1, 2008, and prior to April 15, 2015, if the height and side setbacks were considered by the City to be compliant with Section 11.21, Subdivision 11(A)(3) of the Zoning Code at the time a building permit was issued or applied therefor, the height and leGation are side setback is considered conforming. to However, in all cases, new construction and additions to such properties must comply with current requirements of the Zoning Code. MOVED by Kluchka, seconded by Waldhauser and motion carried unanimously to recommend approval of the following: • Modify the proposed Subdivision 14, making it Subdivision 15, to include the dates and various edits reviewed earlier. • Edit the Zoning Code, Section 11.21, Subdivision 11(A)(3) second sentence phrasing to read...the distance between a structure and the side lot line shall be governed by the following requirements: --Short Recess-- 5. Reports on Meetings o the Housing and Redevelopment Authority, City uncil, Board of Zoni g Appeals and other Meetings Zimmerman", ,ve an update o the Liberty Crossing propos_al�t Winnetka and Medicine Lake Road. �N�� Kluchka asked about th.p states of the Golden Villas proposal and the J-HAP proposal. Zimmerman said both ohhes6 projects are still moving forward. He stated that the City Council liked the idea of a p stran overlay district for the Golden Valley Road/TH 55 area. He said they also wanto"bonsider rezoning the vacant parcels on Golden Valley Road to allow seniox-housin . ' 6. Otp,er Business -f'• Council Liaison 41port Wittman, Lisa From: Wufoo <no-reply@wufoo.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2015 1:32 PM To: Planning Subject: Email the Planning Department [#211] Name Casey Pavek Email caseypavek@gmail.com * Comments To My Neighbors, I'm intentionally not addressing this to our civil servants because they hear enough. Instead I'd like to write to you in the typical passive-aggressive Minnesotan manner I've come to love. We live in a city with many different size homes and lots. My wife and I, our dog Lena, and our baby on the way occupy a rare small lot in the spacious area of the city that I've heard people call Tyrol Hills. Our neighbors to the South don't include us in their average lot size assessment, but we're there. We bought a small home with a small lot because we love the proximity to Theo Wirth, and got a great deal on it because it was bank owned, and unoccupied for 2 years. Yeah the lot is only 40 feet wide but we live right next to Theo and consider THAT our big backyard. Hearing that a proposal to make it nearly impossible to put an addition on our house that would allow us to add a garage, and bump up to the American Dream 2 story that doesn't look like a wedding cake is pretty weak. It's our little chunk of Golden Valley and there is plenty of room on it to build. Our new neighbors built a beautiful home to the North of us, and finding out we may not be able to do the same with our lot is bogus. Please listen to the majority of the residents of Golden Valley that LIKE this kind of development and are looking to the future for a denser, younger, better Golden Valley. Remember, most residents have better things to do in the Spring than attend a city council meeting to hear the swan song of it's oldest residents. So please members of the council, deny the vocal few of the right to control the property of others. 1 Sarcastically yours, Casey Pavek 513 Meadow Lane N 2 Single Family Zoning District (R-1) § 11.21 Subdivision 11. Principal Structures A. 3. Side Setback. Side yard setbacks are determined by the lot width at the minimum required front setback line. The distance between any-partef a structure and the side lot lines shall be governed by the following requirements: 2008, if the side setbacks and height were compliant with the Zening Cede at the time a building peFMit was issued, the lecatien and height aFe censideFed sueh properties must eemply with CUFFent FeqUiFements of the Zoning Gede. Subdivision 14. Pre-April 15, 2015 Structures, Building Permits and Applications. For all structures constructed and building permits issued or applied therefor in the R-1 Zoning District prior to April 15, 2015, if the height and side setbacks were considered by the City to be compliant with the Zoning Code at the time a building permit was issued or applied therefor, the height and location are considered conforming to current Zoning Code. However, in all cases, new construction and additions to such properties must comply with current requirements of the Zoning Code. ORDINANCE NO. 551, 2ND SERIES AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE Amending Chapter 11: Land Use Regulation (Zoning), Clarifying Side Setbacks of Principal Structures The City Council for the City of Golden Valley hereby ordains as follows: Section 1. City Code Section 11.2 1, Subdivision 11 (A)(3) is amended to read as follows: Side Setback. Side yard setbacks are determined by the lot width at the minimum required front setback line. The distance between a structure and the side lot lines shall be governed by the following requirements: Section 2. City Code Section 11.21, Subdivision 14 is deleted and replaced with the following: Subdivision 14. Pre-April 15, 2015 Structures, Building Permits and Applications. For all structures constructed and building permits issued or applied therefor in the R-1 Zoning District prior to April 15, 2015, if the height and side setbacks were considered by the City to be compliant with the Zoning Code at the time a building permit was issued or applied therefor, the height and location are considered conforming to current Zoning Code. However, in all cases, new construction and additions to such properties must comply with current requirements of the Zoning Code. Section 3. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99 entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 4. This Ordinance shall take effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law. Adopted by the City Council this 7th day of April, 2015. /s/Shepard M. Harris Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: /s/Kristine A. Luedke Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk m - µ gold' 'CI-1 MEMORANDUM valley Physical Development Department 763-593-80951763-593-6109(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting April 7, 2015 Agenda Item 4. C. Public Hearing- Ordinance #552 - Amending Section 11.21, Subdivision 12 (E) and (J) Single Family Zoning District (R-1), to Modify the Size of Accessory Structures Prepared By Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager Summary The Zoning Code currently requires a building permit for accessory structures only if they exceed 120 square feet in area, consistent with the previous State Building Code requirements. In 2015, the State Building Code was revised to only require building permits for accessory structures if they exceed 200 square feet. The City adopted the new Building Code earlier this year. Staff is recommending a zoning code text amendment in order to keep our requirements consistent. This change requires an amendment to two sections of code: Chapter 11.21, Subd. 12(E) which sets the threshold for which a building permit is required and Chapter 11.21, Subd. 12(1) which limits the type of roofs allowed on accessory structures to those over 120 square feet. At its March 9, 2015, meeting, the Planning Commission recommended approval (7-0). Attachments • Memo to Planning Commission dated March 9, 2015 (1 page) • Planning Commission minutes dated March 9, 2015 (2 pages) • Underlined-Overstruck Zoning Code Language (1 page) • Ordinance#552 (1 page) Recommended Action Motion to adopt Ordinance #552 Amending Section 11.21, Subdivision 12 (E) and (J) Single Family Zoning District (R-1), to Modify the Size of Accessory Structures. valle Planning Department 763-593-8095/763-593-8109(fax) Date: March 9, 2015 To: Golden Valley Planning Commission From: Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager Subject: Informal Public Hearing—Zoning Text Amendment—Size of Accessory Structures The Zoning Code currently requires a building permit for accessory structures only if they exceed 120 square feet in area, consistent with the State Building Code requirements. In 2015, the State Building Code was revised to only require building permits for accessory structures if they exceed 200 square feet. Staff is recommended a zoning text amendment in order to keep our requirements consistent with those of the State. This change requires an amendment to two sections of code: Chapter 11.21, Subd. 12(E) which sets the threshold for which a building permit is required and Chapter 11.21, Subd. 12(J) which limits the type of roofs allowed on accessory structures to those over 120 square feet. Attachments Underlined-Overstruck Zoning Code Language (1 page) 1 Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission March 9, 2015 Page 11 The property owners of any parcel n PUD No. 121 shall follow the Traffemand nagement Plan for the West E Redevelopment and Centrals West prep d by Kimley-Horn and sub itted with the final PUD apt`cation in February 2015, w will serve to reduce tr ffic congestion. Priorjvv' final PUD approval, the applicant sha clude specific tar t dates in this plan`.The applicant shall pay the remaining 50% o 'I e Traffic Man ement AdMWWtration Fees for Lot 1 when submitting a building p` rmit applic tion. Th.P,'applicant or future property owner of Lot 3 and Outlot A shall Ay.,the T ffic Ubnagement Administration Fees, as outlined in the City's 1-394 Ovarla . ing District Ordinance (Section 11.56). 10.The Developer shall enter into , greement with the City of Golden Valley for public use of the park outlo.,> r 11.Prior to the City signingefd releas g the final plat to the developer for filing with Hennepin County, t le` UD permit nd Development Agreement shall be finalized between the City,: nd the Develope'. MOVED by Ba seconded by Segelb m and motion carried`angrimously to recommend at the City Council addres the traffic issues on Wayz Blvd. raised by residents cluding: access, speed, safe congestion, etc. X aum said he would like to be spe fic about the area to be studied. Baker 5 the study should be Wayzata Blvd. b tween France and Douglas. 3. Informal Public Hearing —Zoning Code Text Amendment— Size of Accessory Structures — ZO00-97 Applicant: City of Golden Valley Purpose: To consider amending language in the Zoning Code in order to match the State Building Code regarding the size of accessory structures allowed before a building permit is required. Zimmerman stated that the State Building Code was recently revised to require building permits for accessory structures only if they exceed 200 square feet in size. He explained that the City's current Zoning Code states that a building permit must be obtained if an accessory structure exceeds 120 square feet in size. In order to keep the City's requirements consistent with those of the State, staff is recommending that the Zoning Code be amended to require building permits for accessory structures if they exceed 200 square feet. He stated that there is another section of the Zoning Code which limits the type of roofs allowed on accessory structures over 120 square feet that staff is recommending that also be changed to 200 square feet. Baker asked if the City has a choice in amending the language in the Zoning Code. Zimmerman said the language could be removed from the Zoning Code and replaced with language referring to the State's Building Code requirements instead. Cera said he would like to keep the language in the Zoning Code. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission March 9, 2015 Page 12 Baker questioned if the City could consider being more restrictive. He said he wants to be sure they are getting the right advice and asked if this is the advice of the inspectors or of the City Attorney. Nevinski explained that the State Building Code is now defining accessory structures less than 200 square feet in size as not needing a building permit. He stated that the Zoning Code can add to that requirement, but the City has adopted the State Building Code and is obligated follow it and enforce it. Kluchka asked if the City is able to enact its own restrictions in the Building Code. Nevinski said no. Segelbaum said the City can enact Zoning Code provisions. Zimmerman reiterated that this proposal is to make the Zoning Code consistent with the State Building Code already adopted. Kluchka asked if the City can make zoning changes that are inconsistent with the building code to offer additional restrictions. Nevinski said he would not advise creating a contradictory situation. Baker questioned if the City should change just because the State has. He said he doesn't have a sense of how often this restriction has a bearing on what Golden Valley residents do, or the impact of the size of accessory structures on neighbors. Segelbaum asked about current limitations for accessory structures. Zimmerman said the Zoning Code address height and setbacks for accessory structures. He said staff will be enacting a Zoning Permit process for accessory structures in the future. He clarified that staff isn't recommending these changes just because the State made changes. It's because the City has adopted the State Building Code and doesn't want its own codes in conflict with each other. Kluchka opened the public hearing. Seeing and hearing no one wishing to comment, Kluchka closed the public hearing. MOVED by Waldhauser, seconded by Johnson and motion carried unanimously to amend the Zoning Code to raise the minimum size of an accessory structure from 120 to 200 square feet for building permits. Blum noted that there are two sections of the Zoning Code that need to be amended. MOVED by Kluchka, seconded by Waldhauser and motion carried unanimously to recommend approval for the Zoning Code Text Amendment in Subdivisions 12 (E) and (J) to increase the minimum square footage to 200 square feet for the size required for a building permit as recommended by staff. MOVED by Cera, seconded by Waldhauser and motion carried unanimously to rescind the first motion. --Short Recess-- Single Family Residential § 11.21 C. Provision for garage. No building permit shall be issued for a single family dwelling not having a two (2) stall garage unless the registered survey submitted at the time of the application for the building permit reflects the necessary area and setback requirements for a future two (2) stall (minimum) garage. D. Cornices and Eaves. Cornices and eaves may not project more than thirty (30) inches into a required setback. Source: Ordinance No. 292, 2nd Series Effective Date: 3-12-04 E. Each property is limited to a total of one thousand (1,000) square feet of the following accessory structures: detached and attached garages, detached sheds, greenhouses, and gazebos. Swimming pools are not included in this requirement. No one (1) detached accessory structure may be larger than eight hundred (800) square feet in area and any accessory structure over etre hundred twenty (120� two hundred (200) square feet in area requires a building permit. Source: Ordinance No. 382, 2"d Series Effective Date: 3-28-08 F. Size of Accessory Structures. No accessory structure shall be larger in size than the principal structure. (See Subdivision 4.A(1)). G. Swimming pools. Swimming pools shall meet the same setback and location requirements for accessory structures. Setbacks shall be measured from the property line to the pool's edge. Decks surrounding above ground pools shall meet setback requirements. H. Decks. Free standing decks or decks attached to accessory buildings shall meet the same setback requirements for accessory buildings. (See Subdivision 16.) I. Central Air Conditioning Units. Central air conditioning units shall not be allowed in the front yard of a single family home. Source: Ordinance No. 292, 2nd Series Effective Date: 3-12-04 I Roof. Gambrel and Mansard roofs are not permitted on any accessory building with a footprint of more than two hundred (200) square feet. Source: Ordinance No. 382, 2nd Series Effective Date: 3-28-08 ORDINANCE NO. 552, 2ND SERIES AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE Amending Chapter 11: Land Use Regulation (Zoning), Regarding the Size of Accessory Structures The City Council for the City of Golden Valley hereby ordains as follows: Section 1. The second sentence in City Code Section 11.21, Subdivision 12 (E) is amended to read as follows: No one (1) detached accessory structure may be larger than eight hundred (800) square feet in area and any accessory structure over two hundred (200) square feet in area requires a building permit. Section 2. City Code Section 11.21, Subdivision 12(J) is amended to read as follows: J. Roof. Gambrel and Mansard roofs are not permitted on any accessory building with a footprint of more than two hundred (200) square feet. Section 3. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99 entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 4. This Ordinance shall take effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law. Adopted by the City Council this 7th day of April, 2015. /s/Shepard M. Harris Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: /s/Kristine A. Luedke Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk mid IP 111110'1111110'11111111 11 �,111111 moiIv' 0 110(111 m III Dot 11111111\11Q Physical Development Department 763-593-8095/763-593-8109(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting April 7, 2015 Agenda Item 6. A. Approval of Plat -Central Park West PUD No. 121 and Authorization to Sign PUD Permit and PUD Development Agreement -Central Park West PUD No. 121 Prepared By Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager Emily Goellner, Associate Planner/Grant Writer Summary At the April 7, 2015, City Council meeting the Council held a public hearing on the Final PUD Plan for Central Park West. After the hearing the Council approved the Final Plan. The Final Plat, PUD Permit and PUD Development Agreement have been prepared for consideration. City staff has reviewed the documents and finds them to be consistent with the approved Final PUD Plan and the requirements of City Code. Attachments • PUD Permit -Central Park West PUD No. 121 (3 pages) • PUD Development Agreement -Central Park West PUD No. 121 (8 pages) • Resolution for Approval of Plat - Central Park West PUD No. 121 (2 pages) • Final Plat -Central Park West PUD No. 121 (3 pages) Recommended Action 1. Motion to adopt Resolution for Approval of Plat - Central Park West PUD No. 121. 2. Motion to authorize the Mayor and City Manager to sign the PUD Permit and Development Agreement for Central Park West PUD No. 121. Central Park West P.U.D. No. 121 City Council Approval: April 7, 2015 City of Golden Valley, Minnesota Use Permit for Planned Unit Development Project Name: Central Park West P.U.D. No. 121 Location: 1400 and 1500 Highway 100 South, and 5075 Wayzata Blvd, Golden Valley, Minnesota Legal Description: Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 1 and OutlotA, Central Park West P.U.D. No. 121 Applicant: DLC Residential, LLC Address: 5245 Wayzata Blvd., St. Louis Park, MN 55416 Owner: DLC Residential, LLC Address: 5245 Wayzata Blvd., St. Louis Park, MN 55416 Zoning District: Business and Professional Offices Permitted Uses: To allow two six-story multiple family residential buildings, a six- story hotel, two 11-story office buildings, a parking ramp and a linear park in both St. Louis Park and Golden Valley. A portion of the Residential Phase One building, a portion of the parking ramp, and the entire hotel surface parking lot will be located in Golden Valley. Components: A. Land Use 1. The plans prepared by DLC Residential, LLC dated February 4, 2015, and March 20, 2015, submitted with the Final PUD Plan application shall become a part of this approval. 2. A Park Dedication Fee of $70,568 shall be paid by the developer prior to release of the Final Plat and the issuance of any building permits. 3. After the site is completely built-out, no snow shall be stored on the site. 4. The City of St. Louis Park approves that portion of the PUD within its jurisdiction. 5. Because the current Final PUD Plan includes only construction plans for Lot 1 and Lot 2 and concept plans for Lot 3 and Outlot A, the applicant or future property Central Park West P.U.D. No. 121 Page 2 owner must submit an application for a PUD Amendment, and receive approval therefor, when more detailed plans for Lot 3 and Outlot A are prepared, prior to issuance of any building permits for Lot 3 or Outlot A. B. Construction 1. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Fire Department to the Planning Manager dated March 25, 2015 shall become a part of this approval. 2. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memos from the Engineering Division to the Planning Manager dated March 27, 2015, shall become a part of this approval. 3. The design specifications, including building location, fagade treatment and materials, and site design, as submitted by the applicant, shall become part of this approval. 4. All signs on the property must meet the requirements of the City's sign code. C. Grading, Utilities, Access and Other Engineering Issues 1. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Engineering Division to the Planning Manager dated March 27, 2015, shall become a part of this approval. 2. The applicant is assessed a Traffic Management Administration Fee of $8,655.80 per City Code. Payment of half of the fee ($4,327.90) was received on February 27, 2015. (The remaining half of the fee is required to be paid prior to the issuance of a Building Permit.) The applicant shall pay the Traffic Management Fees associated with each phase of construction, as outlined in the City's 1-394 Overlay Zoning District. The applicant or any future property owner shall adhere to the Travel Demand Management Plan submitted to the City on March 20, 2015. 3. The Developer shall enter into an agreement with the City of Golden Valley for public use of the park Outlot. 4. The applicant shall dedicate easements for public use of certain sidewalks and trails located within the City of Golden Valley, both inside and outside the Linear Park, in a form acceptable to the City Attorney. D. Subdivision 1. Proof of filing of the plat shall take the form of a certified copy of the fully recorded plat, or a receipt from the County specifically noting that the applicant has paid for such a copy to be sent to the City when it becomes available. Central Park West P.U.D. No. 121 Page 3 2. The name of the final plat shall include "P.U.D. 121" in its title in accordance with City Code. 3. The applicant shall enter into a Development Agreement with the City in conformance with City Code and in a form acceptable to the City Attorney. It is hereby understood and agreed that this P.U.D. Permit is a part of the City Council approval granted on April 7, 2015. Any changes to the PUD Permit for Central Park West P.U.D. No. 121 shall require an amendment. DLC Residential, LLC Witness: By: Title: Date: CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY Witness: By: Shepard M. Harris, Mayor Date.- Witness: ate:Witness: By: Thomas D. Burt, City Manager Date: Warning: This permit is subject to all other state, federal, and local ordinances, regulations, or laws with authority over this development. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT Central Park West P.U.D. #121 AGREEMENT dated this day of April, 2015, by and between the City of Golden Valley, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the "City"), and DLC Residential, LLC, a Minnesota Corporation (the "Developer"). 1. Planned Unit Development Approval. The Developer has asked the City to approve a Planned Unit Development (PUD 121) known as Central Park West, the property which is legally described on Attachment One, attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof (hereinafter referred to as the "Subject Property"). 2. Conditions of PUD Approval. The City has approved PUD 121 subject to the following conditions: a. Conformance to, and inclusion of, all provisions of the Final PUD Plans for Central Park West submitted with the application on February 4, 2015, with revisions submitted on March 20, 2015. b. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Golden Valley Engineering Division to the Planning Manager, dated March 27, 2015, shall become a part of this approval. c. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Golden Valley Fire Department to the Planning Manager, dated March 25, 2015, shall become a part of this approval. d. All signage within the City of Golden Valley must meet the requirements of the Golden Valley City Sign Code. e. The Final Plat name shall include "P.U.D. No. 121" in its title in accordance with City Code. f. A park dedication fee of$70,568 (2% of the estimated land value) shall be paid prior to the City's signing and release of the Final Plat and the issuance of any building permits. g. The Applicant shall submit the remaining 50% (4,327.90) of the Traffic Demand Management Fee for Lot 1 with the submittal of a building permit application. The Applicant shall pay the Traffic Management Administration Fees associated with each phase of construction, as outlined in the City's 1-394 Overlay Zoning District. The applicant or any future property owner shall adhere to the Travel Demand Management Plan submitted to the City on March 20, 2015. h. The Applicant shall dedicate easements for public use of certain sidewalks and trails located within the City of Golden Valley, both inside and outside the Linear Park, in a form acceptable to the City Attorney. i. Because the current Final PUD Plan includes only construction plans for Lot 1 and Lot 2 and concept plans for Lot 3 and Outlot A, the Applicant or future property owner must submit an application for a PUD amendment, and receive approval therefor, when more detailed plans for Lot 3 and Outlot A are prepared, prior to issuance of any building permits for Lot 3 or Outlot A. j. The City of St. Louis Park approves that portion of the final planned unit development within its jurisdiction. 1 k. The Applicant and all development within the PUD shall comply with all other Golden Valley, state, federal, and local ordinances, regulations, or laws with authority over this development. I. The Applicant shall enter into a Development Agreement with the City in conformance with City Code and in a form acceptable to the City Attorney. m. The Applicant shall pay all required fees and costs incurred by the City related to the review and processing of the Application, including legal and professional consulting costs. 3. Additional Obligations of Developer. a. The Developer is required to fund the public infrastructure improvements (turn lanes and associated work) at the intersection of Wayzata Boulevard and Quentin Avenue, as discussed in the Engineering review memorandum dated March 27, 2015, and described herein. b. The Developer must record all declarations, easements, and agreements by or between the private property owners that are within or part of the Central Park West planned unit development. Copies of these documents must be submitted to the City prior to the issuance of permits. c. The City of Golden Valley must be party to all easements dedicated by the Developer for public use of the Linear Park and certain sidewalks and trails located both inside and outside of the Linear Park open space, within the City of Golden Valley, in a form acceptable to the City Attorney. The documents must be recorded and copies must be submitted to the City. d. The Developer must install ADA accessible curb ramps at all street and driveway crossings, and replace/reconstruct any portions of the City's sidewalk on Wayzata Boulevard that are impacted during construction. e. The Developer must obtain a City Right-of-Way Management Permit for all proposed excavations and obstructions within public rights-of-way and easements, including driveway, sidewalk, water main, and storm sewer construction. f. The Developer must obtain a City Stormwater Management Permit for each parcel within the City of Golden Valley, before each phase of construction can begin. g. The Developer must obtain a Tree Preservation Permit for each phase of construction in Golden Valley before construction can begin. h. The Developer must enter into a maintenance agreement with the City, before the issuance of building permits, outlining the Developer's responsibilities for the following: i. Maintenance of public sidewalk along Wayzata Boulevard ii. Maintenance of the hydrant and fire line on the south side of the future hotel site (Lot 3) iii. Maintenance of certain amenities within the Linear Park and certain public use sidewalks and trails 4. Development Plans. The Subject Property shall be developed in accordance with the approved plans, original copies of which are on file with the City's Physical Development Department. 2 5. Installation by Developer. a. Site Improvements. The Developer shall install or cause to be installed and pay for the following, hereinafter referred to as "Site Improvements." The securities required for Site Improvements are discussed later in this Agreement. i. Setting of Lot and Block Monuments ii. Surveying and staking of work required to be performed by the Developer. iii. Installation of gas, electric, communications, and cable lines prior to building occupancy. Developer must place these facilities underground. iv. Installation of lighting to serve the development as shown on Final Plans. V. Installation of any sanitary sewer services and water services to the buildings. vi. Installation of fire lines and hydrants as shown on the Final Plans. vii. Installation of all storm sewer and storm water quality treatment facilities as shown on the Final Plans or as otherwise approved by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. viii. Installation of sidewalk and pedestrian facilities as shown on the Final Plans. ix. Installation of driveway aprons that meet City standards. X. The grading, erosion control and landscaping, all of which shall be made in accordance with Final Plans. xi. Construction of the Linear Park and park amenities, including but not limited to the monument sign and benches, as shown on the Final Plans, and as may be amended in final construction plans approved by the City. 6. Deposit and Payment for Public Improvements. The Developer shall submit a Cash Deposit for the public improvements necessitated by the development of PUD 121, hereinafter referred to as "Deposit for Public Improvements." These public improvements will be constructed by the City of Golden Valley and comprise improvements to the intersection of Wayzata Boulevard and Quentin Avenue South on the east side of Trunk Highway 100, including the construction of turn lanes and retaining walls, installation of stop signs, and related work associated with the intersection improvements. The Developer will provide conceptual plans that define the scope of the project that are acceptable to the City Engineer. The scope of the project is subject to comments and revisions by the Minnesota Department of Transportation. The estimated cost for public improvements is $250,000.00. It is anticipated that these improvements will be completed by the City in 2016. The City shall treat the deposit as a separate account on its books. All interest earned on the deposit shall accrue to the City. The Developer agrees to reimburse the City for any and all out-of-pocket fees and expenses incurred by the City for construction of the intersection improvements, all such costs to be taken from the deposit. When any amount becomes due and payable, the City shall deduct the amount from the deposit. Upon request the City will provide Developer with a reasonably detailed itemization of costs incurred. After the payment of 3 all such amounts, the City shall refund to the Developer the balance of the deposit, if any, without interest. Should there be any outstanding balance for materials or work associated with the improvements over the deposited moneys, the City will notify the Developer as soon as reasonably possible, and the Developer shall reimburse the City for the remaining costs within 30 days of receipt of an invoice from the City. Should there be any outstanding balance over the deposited moneys, the Developer shall reimburse the City for the remaining costs up to an additional $250,000 beyond the deposit amount of$250,000. 7. License. The Developer, and its successors and assigns, hereby grant the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors a license to enter the Subject Property during the site development, including construction, and all times thereafter, to perform all work and inspections applicable thereto and contemplated under this Agreement. 8. Property Fees and Charges. The Developer shall pay all applicable fees, charges and assessments for PUD 121 and the Subject Property in effect at the time of issuance of building permits. The fees shall include following fees: a. Park Dedication Fee The Developer is assessed a Park Dedication Fee of$70,568 per City Code. Payment in full is required prior to the City's signing and release of the Final Plat and the issuance of any building permits. b. Traffic Management Administration Fee The Developer is assessed a Traffic Management Administration Fee of $4,327.90 (payment of half of the fee) for the first phase of construction and is required prior to release of the final plat. The remaining half of the fee ($4,327.90) is required to be paid with the submittal of a building permit application. The developer of any PUD amendment for future phases of construction shall pay the Traffic Management Administration Fees, as outlined in the City's 1-394 Overlay Zoning District, 9. Securities for Site Improvements.The Developer shall submit a Cash Deposit or Stand-by Irrevocable Letter of Credit in a form acceptable and issued by a local banking institution acceptable to the City Attorney for the following: a. 125% of the estimated cost to furnish and install all materials identified in the Landscape Plan for PUD 121 (calculated at $50,140 x 125% _ $62,675) on file in the Physical Development Department. The landscape security required herein may be reduced by 66%following installation of landscape materials per the approved plan and upon acceptance by the City. The remaining balance of the landscape security will be retained by the City for a warranty period of two years following installation and acceptance by the City to ensure survival of the plant materials. The remaining balance will be released to the Developer following the City's acceptance of the two-year warranty inspection. b. 125% of the estimated cost to furnish and install all park amenities identified in the Linear Park Site Plan (calculated at $15,000 x 125% _ $18,750) within the City 4 of Golden Valley on file in the Physical Development Department. Park amenities include but are not limited to the monument sign and benches, The security for park amenities required herein will be released following installation of the amenities and inspection and acceptance by the City. 10. Developer's Default. In the "Event of Default" by the Developer as to any of the work to be performed by it hereunder,the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City, provided the Developer is first given notice of the work in default, not less than 48 hours in advance. Developer grants the City the full authority and license to act pursuant to any default that is not cured by the Developer within six weeks, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a court order for permission to enter the land. When the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, levy the cost in whole or in part as a special assessment against the Subject Property. The Developer waives its right to notice of hearing and hearing on such assessments and waives the right to appeal such assessments pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.081. The following shall be an "Event of Default" under this Agreement: (i) Failure by the Developer to pay when due and invoiced the amounts required to be paid by Developer under any provision of this Agreement; or (ii) failure by the Developer to observe and substantially perform any covenant, condition or obligation on its part to be observed or performed under this Agreement. 11. Responsibility for Costs.The Developer shall indemnify and hold the City and its officers, employees and agents harmless from claims made by Developer for damages sustained or costs directly incurred resulting from development of the Project, construction and operation, except for such damages or costs resulting from the gross negligence, intentional misconduct or intentional violation of this Agreement or applicable laws and ordinance by the City, or its officers or employees. 12. Miscellaneous. a. The Developer represents to the City that the development of the Subject Property as contemplated herein complies with all City, county, metropolitan, state and federal laws and regulations including, but not limited to: subdivision ordinances, zoning ordinances and environmental regulations. b. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City under this Agreement. c. In addition to any other remedies available to the City, Breach of any term of this Agreement by the Developer shall be grounds for denial of building permits, including lots sold to third parties. d. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph or phase of this Agreement is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Agreement. e. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Agreement. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. 5 The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Agreement shall not be a waiver or release. f. This Agreement, any amendments hereto, and conditions of the Ordinance are binding on all successors and assigns of the Developer, shall run with the land and shall be recorded against the title to the property. This Agreement must be recorded in the appropriate Hennepin County land records at the expense of the Developer and a copy of the recorded executed Agreement provided by the Developer to the City. g. Developer, its successors and assigns, agree to provide the execution of amendments to this Agreement, as are necessary to effect the recording hereof. After the Developer has completed the work required of it under this Agreement, at the Developer's request, the City will execute and deliver a release to the Developer as for the obligations related to such work. h. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, express or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to the City, at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. i. Developer may not assign this Agreement without the written permission of the City. j. The Developer represents to the City that, with respect to itself (and with respect to thirds parties, to its actual knowledge,) no material misrepresentations have been or will be made, nor has any materially inaccurate information was or will be provided to the City by the Developer during the City's review process. k. Notwithstanding any provision of this Agreement to the contrary, to the full extent permitted by State laws, any further development or construction of new improvements and any additions or alterations to existing improvements not expressly approved under this Agreement will require additional approvals from the City, as required by City ordinances, and in full compliance with any amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan or Zoning Ordinance requirements enacted after the date of this Agreement. 13. Notices. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall be either hand delivered to the Developer, its employees or agents, or mailed to the Developer by registered mail at the following addresses: DLC Residential, LLC 5245 Wayzata Boulevard St, Louis Park, MN 55416 Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City Manager, or mailed to the City by registered mail in care of the City Manager at the following address: 6 City Manager City of Golden Valley 7800 Golden Valley Road Golden Valley, MN 55427 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hands the day and year first above written. CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY By: Shepard M. Harris, Mayor By: Thomas D. Burt, City Manager DEVELOPER By: Its STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2015, by Shepard M. Harris, Mayor, and Thomas D. Burt, City Manager, of the City of Golden Valley, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20_, by DLC Residential, LLC, on behalf of the said Developer. Notary Public 7 ATTACHMENT 1 Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 1 and Outlot A, Central Park West P.U.D. No. 121 Resolution 15-32 April 7, 2015 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION FOR APPROVAL OF PLAT - CENTRAL PARK WEST P.U.D. NO. 121 WHEREAS, the City Council for the City of Golden Valley, pursuant to due notice, has heretofore conducted a public hearing on the proposed plat to be known as Central Park West P.U.D. No. 121 covering the following described tracts of land: Outlot A, The Shops at West End. Registered Property Certificate of Title No. 1222619 Lots 2, 3, 4 and 6, Block 4, except that portion of said Lots taken for Belt Line Highway; Lots 7 to 12 inclusive, Block 4, and that part of Raleigh Avenue vacated lying between the Westerly extension of the South line of said Lot 7 and the North line of said Lot 12 and that part of the vacted alley in said Block 4 lying between the Easterly extensions of the North and South lines of said Lot 7 and between the South line of said Lot 9 and the North line of said Lot 11 and that part of the West '/z of the vacated alley in said Block 4 lying between the extensions of the North and South lines of said Lot 8 and between the North and South lines of said Lot 12; All in "Kavlis Cedardale" That part of the following described property: That part of vacated Raleigh and Douglas Avenues as shown on the plat of "Kavlis Cederdale" lying between the extensions across said Avenues of the South and West lines of Lot 7, Block 4 and that part of said vacated Douglas Avenue adjoining Lots 6 and 7, Block 4 of said plat lying between the Westerly line of Belt Line Highway and the extension across said Avenue of the West line of said Lot 7, Block 4, "Kavlis Cedardale"; Which lies Northerly of a straight line extending between the Southwest corner of Tract E, Registered Land Survey No. 864, Hennepin County, Minnesota and the Westerly right-of-way of State Trunk Highway 100 passing through a point of the East line of said Tract E distant 18.18 feet North of the Southeast corner of said Tract E as measured along said East line. Registered Property Certificate of Title No. 1012678 Lot 1, Block 4, "Kavlis Cedardale" and that part of the vacated alley in said Block 4, lying East of the center line thereof and between the extensions across it of the North and South lines of said Lot 1. And That part of the North 693.61 feet of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 30, Township 29, Range 24 lying Westerly and Southerly of State Trunk Highway No. 100, also known as the Belt Line Highway. Registered Property Certificate of Title No. 1012734 Resolution No. 15-32 - Continued April 7, 2015 That part of the South 60 feet of the North 753.61 feet of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 30, Township 29, Range 24, lying West of the Belt Line Highway. Registered Property Certificate of Title No. 1012680 That part of vacated Raleigh Avenue and of vacated Douglas Avenue, all according to the plat of"Kavlis Cedardale" lying Westerly of the Westerly right of way line of State Trunk Highway No. 100 as described in the Final Certificated recorded in Book 412 of Miscellaneous Records, page 148 in the office of the County Recorder and lying Southerly of a line drawn from the Southwest corner of Tract E, Registered Land Survey No. 864 and passing through a point of the East line of said Tract E distant 18.18 feet North of the Southeast corner of said Tract E. Registered Property Certificate of Title No. 1012686 That part of vacated Utica Avenue South, as dedicated on the plat of THE SHOPS AT WEST END, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying easterly of the following described line: Commencing at the northwest corner of Outlot A, said plat; thence on an assumed bearing of South, along the west line of said Outlot A, a distance of 95.16 feet to a corner of said Outlot A and the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence, continuing on a bearing of South, a distance of 81.53 feet to a corner of said Outlot A, and said line there terminating. WHEREAS, all persons present were given the opportunity to be heard; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council for the City of Golden Valley, that said proposed plat be, and the same hereby is, accepted and approved, and the proper officers of the City are hereby authorized and instructed to sign the original of said plat and to do all other things necessary and proper in the premises. Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by the City Clerk. DRAFT CENTRAL PARK WEST P . U . D . NO . 121 R.T..DOC.NO. KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS:That DLC Residential LLC,a Florida limited liability company,owner of the following described property: I Marcus F.Hampton do hereby certify that this plat was prepared by me or under my direct supervision;that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor in the State of Minnesota;that this plat is a correct representation of the boundary survey;that all mathematical data and labels are correctly designated on this Outlot A,THE SHOPS AT WEST END. plat;that all monuments depicted on this plat have been,or will be correctly set within one year;that all water boundaries and wet lands,as defined in Minnesota Statutes,Section 505.01,Subd.3,as of the date of this certificate are shown and labeled on this plat;and all public ways are shown and labeled Registered Property on this plat. Certificate of Title No,1222619 Dated this_day of ,20 Lots 2,3,4 and 6,Block 4,except that portion of said Lots taken for Belt Line Highway; Lots 7 to 12 inclusive,Block 4,and that part of Raleigh Avenue vacated lying between the Westerly extension of the South line of said Lot 7 and the North line of said Lot 12 and that part of the vacated alley in said Block 4lying between the Easterly extensions of the North and South lines of said Lot 7 and Marcus F.Hampton,Licensed Land Surveyor between the South line of said Lot 9 and the North line of said Lot it and that part of the West 1/2 of the vacated alley in said Block 4lying between the Minnesota License No.47481 extensions of the North and South lines of said Lot 8 and between the North and South lines of said Lot 12; All in"Kavlis Cedardale". STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF That part of the following described property: That part of vacated Raleigh and Douglas Avenues as shown on the plat of"Kavlis Cedardale"lying between the extensions across said Avenues of the South The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20_,by Marcus F.Hampton,a Licensed Land Surveyor. and West lines of Lot 7,Block 4 and that part of said vacated Douglas Avenue adjoining Lots 6 and 7,Block 4 of said plat lying between the Westerly line of Belt Line Highway and the extension across said Avenue of the West line of said Lot 7,Block 4,"Kavlis Cedardale"; Which lies Northerly of a straight line extending between the Southwest corner of Tract E,Registered Land Survey No.864,Hennepin County,Minnesota and the Westerly right-of-way of State Trunk Highway 100 passing through a point on the East line of said Tract E distant 18.18 feet North of the Southeast Notary Public, County,Minnesota Notary Printed Name corner of said Tract E as measured along said East line. My Commission Expires Registered Property Certificate of Title No.1012678 CITY COUNCIL,CITY OF SAINT LOUIS PARK,MINNESOTA Lot 1,Block 4,"Kavlis Cedardale"and that part of the vacated alley in said Block 4,lying East of the center line thereof and between the extensions across it This plat of CENTRAL PARK WEST P.U.D.NO.121 was approved and accepted by the City Council of the City of Saint Louis Park,Minnesota,at a regular of the North and South lines of said Lot 1. meeting thereof held this_day of 20_and said plat is in compliance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes,Section 505.03, And Subd.2. That part of the North 693.61 feet of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 30,Township 29,Range 24 lying Westerly and Southerly of City Council,City of Saint Louis Park,Minnesota State Trunk Highway No.100,also known as the Belt Line Highway. Registered Property By: Mayor By Clerk Certificate of Title No.1012734 That part of the South 60 feet of the North 753.61 feet of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 30,Township 29,Range 24,lying West of the Belt Line Highway. CITY COUNCIL,CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY,MINNESOTA Registered Property This plat of CENTRAL PARK WEST P.U.D.NO.121 was approved and accepted by the City Council of the City of Golden Valley,Minnesota,at a regular Certificate of Title No.1012680 meeting thereof held this_day of 20—and said plat is in compliance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes,Section 505.03, Subd.2. That part of vacated Raleigh Avenue and of vacated Douglas Avenue,all according to the plat of"Kavlis Cedardale"lying Westerly of the Westerly right of way line of State Trunk Highway No.100 as described in the Final Certificate recorded in Book 412 of Miscellaneous Records,page 148 in the office of the County Recorder and lying Southerly of a line drawn from the Southwest corner of Tract E,Registered Land Survey No.864 and passing through a point on City Council,City of Golden Valley,Minnesota the East line of said Tract E distant 18.18 feet North of the Southeast corner of said Tract E. Registered Property By: Mayor By Clerk Certificate of Title No.1012686 That part of vacated Utica Avenue South,as dedicated on the plat of THE SHOPS AT WEST END,Hennepin County,Minnesota,lying easterly of the following described line: Commencing at the northwest corner of Outlot A,said plat;thence on an assumed bearing of South,along the west line of said Outlot A,a distance of RESIDENT AND REAL ESTATE SERVICES,Hennepin County,Minnesota 95.16 feet to a corner of said Outlot A and the point of beginning of the line to be described;thence,continuing on a bearing of South,a distance of 81.53 feet to a corner of said Outlot A,and said line there terminating. I hereby certify that taxes payable in 20_and prior years have been paid for land described on this plat,dated this day of 20 Has caused the same to be surveyed and platted as CENTRAL PARK WEST P.U.D.NO.121 and does hereby dedicate to the public for public use the public way and drainage and utility easements as created by this plat. Mark V.Chapin,County Auditor By Deputy In witness whereof said DLC Residential LLC,a Florida limited liability company,has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this day of 20. SURVEY DIVISION,Hennepin County,Minnesota SIGNED:DLC RESIDENTIAL LLC Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 383B.565(1969),this plat has been approved this day of 20_. Byas Chris F.Mavis,County Surveyor By STATE OF MINNESOTA REGISTRAR OF TITLES,Hennepin County,Minnesota COUNTY OF I hereby certify that the within plat of CENTRAL PARK WEST P.U.D.NO.121 was filed in this office this day of 20� This instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20�by at_o'clock—M. ,as of DLC Residential LLC,a Florida limited liability company,on behalf of the company. Martin McCormick,Registrar of Titles By Deputy Notary Public, County,Minnesota Notary Printed Name My Commission Expires SAMBATEK, INC. ENGINEERING,PLANNING AND LAND SURVEYING SHEET 1 OF 3 SHEETS DRAFT =10.20 23• _._ f' ,•` L=18884 R=935.60 R.T..DOC.NO. -pOC.N0.2401510 :605.7) R`95493 ds 36'20'31 6S1va\fi,r/ N86.52'1094.•3W R=904.93 - d=6°06' 9-4750 W 5 _.9J6�,�60L=46.38 N12984<- � _ /lot - - = /�III W`blR�al �.�/��E�//�,/�1/fi3�•/�i �.��-.�'��N��5�0y.J-��I'/�`''�4°s55�1jL 3o53X,q3",25p7.`�:1�'R�.".-0-�.�-0-1T;.1 L125.`1 R 41Z _•' R, �� 11l. ugNsxaJNORTH :76 ; 1 --- FD L54741 -------i0 L547481 ` -----------0 9T- i _ CENTRAL PWEST now tomI/oI u/7r IL=32.17 Dq' •.521'I7'19Y EA51BN 915 6s I i P . U . D . NO . 121 00. 5 - 5 - 487909•ca9.-s?42677w I I c-41.48 SOOV0102w I I - J841 31 Nor - TANOENr - • I '�I I I No0wvow�' / CBig.-N25'4J:722 ( 21 / C>•65.11 /4J7Pi 7 I $ -_BBANA6E?UIW7Y_-` �I ° EASEMENT I ✓i Lu N715492 I/01 am_-__-_--_----- . r -------------------------------- 3 / - ---- ---- -- - _-___ _______ 4 ------- ------ ------------- r /fi''• �/ .I I u - - - - - - - - - - --7' �- - - - I- NORTH - �•.. v/ - - - - - - - - - - NORTH 52.20 4. -p ' 0 50 100 SCALE IN FEET f OI ♦/ / L!WI I NJ I ., NORTH 323.28 1 $ I 21.45 I?• I lb 1:- I \I ------- ��10 I I- snvtio>o'we%2o � r WT IW783 } I ISR 8 I J i I -842 Is R 1 1 �, 4 10 e y I j�Faa `' / `t I p 2 O DENOTES 1/2 INCH BY 14 INCH IRON z D1 I I 1 ro l I ? m W I MONUMENT SET AND MARKED BY LICENSE NO. 47481. I m l el I IOW • DENOTES 1/2 INCH IRON MONUMENT FOUND I W OD I 81 I N I UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN. $ O DENOTES SECTION CORNER MONUMENT I I o I R=24.33 DRAWACE 9on1/7r L-------_r, -•EASEMENT J7J--, I __I-• �' 4=91.1212 .�%' I' 2 '�I THE SOUTH LINE OF OUTLOT A,THE SHOPS AT WEST I ' 1101 END,IS ASSUMED TO HAVE A BEARING OF SOUTH 89 12.52 G-F-------� 24.854, Y0� I ' N1547461 ---- ----------------J892T --- 'L'J C- 10.00_--rL_ DEGREES 39 MINUTES 44 SECONDSWEST. 1 _ FD L5 47481 313.83 I 141.03 I ---- I I 142.09 ,'a . �i _. FD L547481 �i �- -` ,SB979'OJ7<--' BOJ6.....1. _.. ,, 9576 - BLs3 � I t Naa0o0o.w I =w A� NORTH 479.71 - - 167.98 188J a I -.€ 'R `UTICA AVENUE S NOO°40'56"E rI a B I A A V E I'...._ I I I \ I I " 'r I / a i I ►` 1 SAMBATEK,INC. 5 I II SAND LAND SURVEYING SHEET 2 OF 3 SHEETS DRAFT R.T..DOC.NO. '(AI(n'artr LINE NICNWAY). Si'•' 1�32 T- — �2 E 26721—I— — — -- -- — J— — �— EXCEPTI ON CENTRAL PARK � _`—�� * e _ l� =✓a z+olslo JI A To Sv n 3 S _—�� ZT ;FjE = N g N14fAA,EN7 2^ _� A719// kN _ _ WEST P . U . D . N 121 6 0 VACATED ALLEY LYING E OF �g CENTERlBNE BEPAEEN THE WILY I g �,>9! Ltx 3£MENr— o ,sJ , , I `\ Nl•1 > ,SUNESOFExLOTHENa � __`_�s2ol, z1— ,oT I jo _ _—`FO 1 1 VACATED ALLEY LYING roy; NAIL 164 �` I i' BETWEEN INE EXTEN90N5 A I =m I nI, , B7•JY09" LL OF THE 8 LINE OF LOT 9 AFRf I p 1g 16 I 6 '�f $ , �1 __ :IT.22 I 48.66 I I W s TINE N UWE OF LOT II I ts II N/L'iT'SJY4 +n �i ClO3lz 65 00 • per c I'SB � A°7>B+B, Weis 0 099Jr r` - Itl^ m I fix 6$ I I W 4 W z.n Z I p �y^� p� VACATED RALEIGH AND DOUGLAS AYE LYING WLr O P _ $ OR pZ I I y �' q I ,h� Z$ I�B- of THE w LONE of S.T.H.Na 100 a LG`F Sly 6TH I ,"I . * / �1 OOppD RLS ISLINE DRAWN i PASSING EAS NNGG THHROUGH AA POINrT O THE to E LINE OF TRACT E DISTANT 18.18 FT N OF THE SE CDR OF TRACT E BgFFii ..` \'NB1b95Bt' THE EEXTEN90NRSOFOF THGH E 9 DOUGLAS LINES OF LOST 77AAND I ry 1 THE SW CDR W #., 5007067__y ____ k -___ ---_OF TRACT E RS NOLYING N'LY OF A E8684 a�THE WLY ROW g Z _ --60.00--- + _ _ J— B-� __Al;b 1,..�L m OF STH.WO PASSNG THROUGH A POINT ON ry - ' VACATED RALEIGH AVE LYING `�' I Sy3�98/'F _ __ I THE EEE ff CSAt;OR TRACT RA CT DISTANT 18.16 FT J __------ Imo' BETWEEN THE WLY E%TEN9ONI, /� SE CORNER TRACT THE SE OF THE S UWE OF LOT 7 AND •, ,Pian _i6.00 r U I THE N lGE a LOT 12 _T _ Q Y e' I'>' FT)MAG NAL I` -MARLSNHO.884 - - — _ ? 2 NORTH IRAQ — EASr LM R SCF&_'/ SG17b0'002'__` --� 1B.15 „.yJ 0 50 100 S00°20'16'E I S L N90tU'077 -' I,� ,- �\ 49.00 SCALE IN FEET I 79.91 U9L1rY£AS£II£N7 `< _ —, X18 \y,WA1ER MANN EASEIIENr E PER OOG NO 63830! OUTLOT A PER OX.NO N0077577. _ W f BECKON 51.82 (,5 v I SW CORNER. I ZI 1 I v I a I N I I W N � w � � H N •— I L_ __ Ir Oppp I " I to ,• O DENOTES 1/2 INCH BY 14 INCH IRON $ _ MONUMENT SET AND MARKED BY LICENSE NO. 6 �• 47481. ^�. • DENOTES 112 INCH IRON MONUMENT FOUND UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN. DENOTES SECTION CORNER MONUMENT SOOw'ov7 �E o FO MAG NAL \0` __— I • VS < '507 _ —J - , FD L51718, --_-J e NB9790J'W ------------- o ;'- 63.88 ,, 43 `.. , SOUTH 89 iB9s `, 1 'W L-93.n I ,� --- , NO3'S0'20 �� _- DEGREES 39 MINUTES 44SECONDS WEST. THE SOUTH LINE OF OUTLOT A,THE SHOPS WEST END,IS ASSUMED TO HAVE A BEARING Of SO I, 25.89 s ----FD Lss74ei------ N07°09'S5"w 187.14 W �IN46°20'02"Ei° 12'10'10 ; `ALT)MAG NAIL N52°09'5!04 9.9E — `.a6+ NORTH 93.80 `Y 1 N13�g? R=361.33 e L=45.19 4 v t I X7'09'55'a - I I F__ ISAMBATEK,INC. ENGINEERING,PLANNING �,• AND LAND SURVEYING SHEET 3 OF 3 SHEETS