Loading...
01-20-15 CC Agenda Packet (entire) AGENDA Regular Meeting of the City Council Golden Valley City Hall 7800 Golden Valley Road Council Chamber January 20, 2015 6:30 pm The Council may consider item numbers 1, 2, 3, 5 and 6 prior to the public hearings scheduled at 7 pm *Council Member Fonnest Absent 1. CALL TO ORDER PAGES A. Roll Call B. Pledge of Allegiance C. METRO Blue Line Update 3-5 2. ADDITIONS AND CORRECTIONS TO AGENDA 3. CONSENT AGENDA Approval of Consent Agenda - All items listed under this heading are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no discussion of these items unless a Council Member or citizen so requests in which event the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda. A. Approval of Minutes - City Council Meeting - January 6, 2015 6-12 B. Approval of City Check Register 13 C. Licenses: 1. Solicitor's License - Custom Remodelers Inc. 14-16 D. Minutes of Boards and Commissions: 1. Human Rights Commission - November 25, 2014 17-19 2. Joint Water Commission - December 3, 2014 20-22 3. Open Space & Recreation Commission - November 24, 2014 23-25 4. Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission - November 19, 2014 26-35 E. Bids and Quotes: 1. Purchase Ford Police and Fire Department Interceptor Utility Vehicles 36-37 F. Receipt of Resignation from Michael Herring from Human Services Fund 38 G. Approve Contract with Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community for Removal 39-52 Services for Brush, Soil and Yard Waste 15-07 H. Receipt of Brookview Community Center Task Force Final Report 53-68 I. Authorization to Sign Funding Agreement with Minneapolis for the Toward Zero 69-85 Deaths Grant Program J. Annual Elections for the 2015 Insurance Policy 15-08 86-87 K. Approval of 2015 Government Affairs Priorities 88-114 L. 2nd Consideration - Ordinance #537 - Amending Chapter 5: Alcoholic Beverages 115-119 Licensing and Regulation and approve Publication of Summary 15-09 M. 2nd Consideration - Ordinance #538 - Amending 2015 Master Fee Schedule for 120-121 addition of new license fees N. Receipt of Human Rights Commission 2014 Annual Report and 2015 Work Plan 122-125 3. CONSENT AGENDA - CONTINUED O. Approval of Council Assignments 126 P. Approval of Additional Meeting for Council Reimbursement 127 Q. Authorization to Sign Agreement with Hennepin County for Athletic Field 128-138 Improvements at Sandburg Learning Center R. Authorization of Submittal of Application to Minnesota Department of Employment & 139-168 Economic Development Redevelopment Grant 15-10 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS 7 PM A. Public Hearing - Ordinance #539 - CUP Amendment - 5501 Glenwood Ave - Golden 169-184 Valley Lutheran Church dba Loving Shepherd Early Learning Center, Applicant B. Public Hearing - Ordinance #540 - Amendment to Zoning Code Adding Language 185-204 Regarding Breweries, Taprooms and Brewpubs C. Public Hearing - Ordinance #541 - PUD - 305 & 345 Pennsylvania Ave S - Lake West 205-266 Development, LLC, Applicant 5. OLD BUSINESS 6. NEW BUSINESS A. Announcements of Meetings B. Mayor and Council Communications 7. ADJOURNMENT Nw ) 00 rtI.Iuul e V """I l" 1‘,;� �IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII III)1 UII 0 0„, meI Hoo I; !II F�4 �� inr.i r «luicrrii ,iii uu VIP II mwf nr rrrM1 ` III ,. lily' umi I.i uuum uuu 0 P� " iIl!Liii i�; t i.li��.:u�i.�M SII III.,I qi" �rtm� yam l r��all V,�i ft u ui. 763-593-8095 763-593-8109 ax Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting January 20, 2015 Agenda Item 1. C. METRO Blue Line Extension Update Prepared By Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager Summary Representatives from the METRO Blue Line Extension Project Office and Hennepin County Community Works will be present to introduce themselves to the Council and to give a brief overview of the LRT planning processes going forward. The Issue Resolution Team (IRT) met on January 6, 2015, to discuss the question of the Golden Valley Road/Plymouth Avenue station location. Golden Valley staff advocated for the Golden Valley Road station and expressed support for an additional Plymouth Avenue station. Minneapolis staff supported both stations. The Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board staff withheld formal support for either station at this time, citing the current lack of understanding of the floodplain implications associated with either location. On January 7, 2015, the City's Bottineau Planning Advisory Committee (PAC) hosted a Community Meeting at the Courage Kenny Rehabilitation Institute to help answer questions about the various ongoing LRT planning efforts. Roughly 110 people attended. There will be a second open house associated with station area planning on January 29, 2015, at the University of Minnesota Urban Research and Outreach-Engagement Center (UROC) at 2001 Plymouth Ave N in Minneapolis from 5:30-7:30 pm. The revised concepts for the first four station areas in Minneapolis and Golden Valley will be displayed. Attachments • Emails regarding METRO Blue Line Extension (2 pages) Recommended Action Receive and file METRO Blue Line Extension Update. From: MADGE THORSEN Sent: Wednesday,January 07, 2015 10:16 PM To: Zimmerman,Jason Subject: Public informational meeting Wow, thanks to you personally for being willing to attend this meeting and offer your insights...but what a bust. Want some details? First, the facilitator failed to maintain neutrality and inserted her own opinions and tried to buffer the panel from having to actually answer anything. Second, the panel did not adequately answer anything... for example, here was a yes or no question: Can eminent domain be used for anything related to the proposed station and/or lrt project? Accurate answer: "Yes." Nuances, sure, but the basic answer is yes. Actual answer from panel: "No way, uh yes, well, maybe, don't know, we have no idea, we can't answer that." Suggestion: At any such meeting, agency counsel should be present to handle such questions, even if what they say is "it depends". At least with a legal explanation, it wouldn't sound as evasive or wrong as your panel did. Third, what is the answer to: what happens if Golden Valley refuses Municipal consent? Answer: blah blah blah. What is the answer? Can Metro Transit override it? Can anyone? Suggestion: Answer the question. Fourth, racist comment by guy about low life scum from North Minneapolis. My family is from North Minneapolis. Someone on the panel should have rejected and shut down that comment, just like the crowd did by booing. No room for that. We can oppose this ridiculous alignment because N. Mpls. needs the development and we don't need the destruction of our parks, wetlands and open green space, which is not based on fears of N. Mpls. residents. Fifth, everyone on the panel sounded like a slavish "victim" of the project. "We only have to plan it because that is what we were given to do...." Really? The planners have huge influence. Maybe they can't have an opinion, but they don't have to be apologists for the project either. At least present the real difficulties that the project presents and some genuine sympathy for the community's views, instead of what sounds like canned lip service about "citizen involvement" all the while failing to listen or answer anything. What a shame that the good will and genuine effort of folks like you ends up with a travesty like this...please forward this to the City Council members, because they need to know how out of control this is increasingly going to get. And sorry to say, litigation is inevitable.... From: MADGE THORSEN Sent:Thursday,January 08, 2015 6:29 PM To: tti u i .us• Planning; i i t s i .us Subject:Alignment D-1 and Golden Valley Road Station Last night's meeting with Golden Valley et al residents was not helpful. The panel, good people no doubt, all sounded evasive and spoke from talking points rather than trying to understand and genuinely response to resident concerns. The facilitator failed miserably as a neutral and made every effort to ensure that the questions were neither posed honestly nor answered. It may be too late to save our parks from the incredibly ugly and intrusive operations of an LRT, looking like the line on University Avenue (what a horror), but maybe with authentic attention and care, we could save Wirth park and this suburban/rural area from the terribly misplaced concept of a Golden Valley road station. You all need to hold some listening sessions, not "this is what we have to do no matter what you think" sessions, as was true last night. Although in some ways, it does not matter; this project, like the SW Lrt will become bogged in opposition and litigation and in the end, waste millions, may billions of dollars. But maybe,just maybe, you could create a better process and allow us to save our neighborhoods, parks and homes. UNOFFICIAL MINUTES a Irk/��i/ //iiiiii ii ,. CITY COUNCIL MEETING ° / 1 W„� GOLDEN VALLEY, MINNESOTA �+1 �,� �1lr January 6, 2015 rr'1/r 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Harris called the meeting to order at 6:30 pm. 1A. Roll Call Present: Mayor Harris, Council Members Fonnest, Clausen, Schmidgall and Snope. 1B. Pledge of Allegiance /C. Certificate of Recognition: Ms. Linda Johnson Mayor Harris presented Ms. Johnson with a Certificate of Recognition for her years of service as a Board Member on the District 281 School Board. The Council thanked Ms. Johnson for her service. 2. ADDITIONS AND CORRECTIONS TO AGENDA MOTION made by Council Member Fonnest, seconded by Council Member Clausen to approve the agenda as submitted and the motion carried unanimously. 3. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA MOTION made by Council Member Schmidgall, seconded by Council Member Clausen to approve the consent agenda as revised: removal of 3C-Designation of Official Newspaper, 3D- Designation of Depositories for City Funds, 3G3-Accept the Joint Water Commission Minutes, 3I-File Emails regarding METRO Blue Line Extension and the motion carried unanimously. 3A1. Approve Minutes of City Council Meeting - December 16, 2014. 3B. Approve Time and Receipt of Public Information for Council agenda as 4:30 pm in the City Manager's Office on the Wednesday preceding the Council meeting. 3C. Approve Designation of 2015 Official Newspaper. 3D. Adopt Resolution 15-01 Designating Depositories for City Funds. 3E1. Approve City Check Register and authorize the payments of the bills as submitted. 3E2. Approve Housing and Redevelopment Authority Check Register and authorize the payments of the bills as submitted. 3F1. Approve Solicitor's License for Wisdom Executives, Inc. 3F2. Approve Solicitor's License for Working America AFL-CIO. 3G. Accept for filing the Minutes of Boards and Commissions as follows: 1. Planning Commission - November 24 and December 8, 2014 2. Open Space & Recreation Commission - October 27, 2014 3. Joint Water Commission - October 28, 2014 4. Basset Creek Watershed Management Commission - October 16, 2014 3H. Approve Appointment of Dave Gustafson, Don Nutter, Al Lundstrom and Tim Teynor, as the Assistant Weed Inspectors for a one-year term. 31. File and Receive Email regarding METRO Blue Line Extension. 3J. Adopt Resolution 15-02 Approval of Plat for Ski Hill Park. 3K. Adopt Resolution 15-03 Authorizing the Master Partnership Contract with the State of Minnesota. 3L. Adopt Resolution 15-04 relating to the Financing of Capital Equipment; Establishing Compliance with Reimbursement Bond Regulations under the Internal Revenue Code. Unofficial City Council Minutes -2- January 6, 2015 3. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA - continued 3M. Approve usage of credit cards by any City Employee who has received prior approval from the appropriate Supervisor and by the Finance Director and/or City Manager. 3N. Adopt Resolution 15-05 Approval of Plat for Brunswick Estates. 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA 3C. Designation of the 2015 Official Newspaper MOTION made by Council Member Schmidgall, seconded by Council Member Snope to designate the New Hope/Golden Valley SunPost as the 2015 official newspaper and the motion carried unanimously. 3D. Resolution 15-01 Designation of Depositories for City Funds Council Member Snope disclosed his wife is employed by Wells Fargo Bank which is one of the depositories. He stated even though there was not a conflict of interest, he would abstain from any discussion and action. MOTION made by Council Member Schmidgall, seconded by Council Member Clausen to adopt Resolution 15-01, Designating Depositories for City Funds upon a vote being taken the following voted in favor of: Harris, Fonnest, Schmidgall and Clausen, the following voted against: none and the following abstained: Snope and the motion carried. 3G3. Receive and File the Minutes of the Joint Water Commission - October 28, 2014 City Engineer Oliver answered questions from Council. MOTION made by Council Member Fonnest, seconded by Council Member Snope to receive and file the Minutes of the Joint Water Commission of October 28, 2014, and the motion carried unanimously. 31. Receive and File Email regarding METRO Blue Line Extension Mr. John Fritze, 1828 York Avenue North, requested Council remove this item from the consent agenda and stated he supported the information in the email. MOTION made by Council Member Snope, seconded by Council Member Clausen to receive and file the Email regarding METRO Blue Line Extension and the motion carried unanimously. 4. PUBLIC HEARING 4A. Public Hearing - 2015 Pavement Management Program, Project 15-01, 2016 Pavement Management Program, Project 16-01, and 2017 Pavement Management Program, Project 17-01 City Engineer Oliver presented the staff report and answered questions from Council. Mayor Harris opened the public hearing. Ms. Phyllis Kyrola, 1320 Gettysburg Avenue North, stated earlier this year she was told the special assessment fee would be $6,300 and now it is $6,600. She asked when the assessment amount changed and why. Unofficial City Council Minutes -3- January 6, 2015 4A. Public Hearing - 2015, 2016 & 2017 Pavement Management Program - continued Mr. Dan Cisler, 1324 Gettysburg Avenue North, asked why the assessment fee was so high. He explained he owned another property in Golden Valley that had a similar assessment 14 years ago and the amount at that time was $1,500. Mr. John Ostdiek, 1609 Gettysburg Avenue North, asked if his house flooded during construction who he could contact about the issue. He said his house does not have a sump pump and currently does not need one. Ms. Linda Staskivige, 1309 Gettysburg Avenue North, asked since the project will be split up over three years with Gettysburg scheduled for the first year, how will her street be affected during the following two years of construction because her street is the only through street in the area. Ms. Gladys Williamson, 1412 Hillsboro Avenue, asked during the construction period, how she will be able to access other streets in her area. She also asked about the drain which is currently in her yard as to where the water would be carried to, and where it would be ponding. Ms. Denise Strandlund, 9450 Olympia Street, said her house is one of the four being looked at to be purchased. She said she is concerned as to what would happen if her house is not purchased because she may not have the option to buy another house at low interest rates. She explained what happens in the neighborhood during the flooding and what the neighbors have had to do to protect their cars and property. She asked what options she would have if the City does not purchase her house, or is unable to fix the flooding problems since if she were to sell her house, she would need to disclose past flooding issues. Mr. Harry Rinowski, 1621 Hillsboro Avenue North, asked what the construction time frame would be from start to finish of the project. Mayor Harris closed the public hearing. There was much Council discussion regarding the Pavement Management Program for 2015, 2016 and 2017. MOTION made by Council Member Clausen, seconded by Council Member Fonnest to adopt Resolution 15-06, ordering Construction of Certain Proposed Public Improvements and Authorizing Advertisement for Bids for City Project 15-01, 2015 Pavement Management Program; City Project 16-01, 2016 Pavement Management Program; and City Project 17-01, 2017 Pavement Management Program upon a vote being taking the following voted in favor of: Harris, Clausen, Schmidgall, Fonnest and Snope, the following voted against: none and the motion carried. 4B. Public Hearing - Approval of Conditional Use Permit 138 - 905 Decatur Avenue North - Our World Shops, Inc., Applicant Planning Manager Zimmerman presented the staff report and answered questions from Council. Mr. Ben Horn, Applicant, stated his business operates six e-commerce sites that sell products from Finland. He said some of the brands he sales require him to have a brick and mortar location. Unofficial City Council Minutes -4- January 6, 2015 4B. Public Hearing - Approval of Conditional Use Permit 138 - continued Mayor Harris opened the public hearing. No one came forward. Mayor Harris closed the public hearing. There was Council discussion regarding the approval of a Conditional Use Permit for Our World Shops, Inc. located 905 Decatur Avenue North. MOTION made by Council Member Snope, seconded by Council Member Clausen to adopt Ordinance #535, Approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 138, 905 Decatur Avenue North, Our World Shops, Applicant upon a vote being taking the following voted in favor of: Harris, Snope, Schmidgall, Fonnest and Clausen the following voted against: none and the motion carried. 4C. Public Hearing - Preliminary PUD Plan for Struthers Parkinson's Center PUD No. 39, Amendment #4 - 6681 & 6701 Country Club Drive - Park Nicollet Methodist Hospital, Applicant Associate Planner Goellner presented the staff report and answered questions from Council. City Attorney Barnard answered questions from Council. Ms. Rose Wichmann, Manager of the Struthers Parkinson's Center, gave a brief history of the center and an overview of the enhancements that the center would be adding both indoors and outdoors. Mayor Harris opened the public hearing. No one came forward. Mayor Harris closed the public hearing. There was Council discussion regarding the Preliminary PUD Plan for Struthers Parkinson's Center located at 6681 & 6701 Country Club Drive. MOTION made by Council Member Schmidgall, seconded by Council Member Fonnest to approve the Preliminary Plan for Struthers Parkinson's Center PUD No. 39, Amendment No. 4, subject to the following conditions and findings and the motion carried unanimously: 1. The plans prepared by EAPC architects and submitted with the application on November 7, 2014, shall become a part of this approval, 2. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Fire Department to Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager, dated December 1, 2014, shall become a part of this approval. 3. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Engineering Division to Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager, dated December 1, 2014, shall become a part of this approval. 4. A shared parking agreement shall be confirmed or enacted upon or before Final PUD approval. 5. The Applicant shall submit a lighting plan that meets the requirements of the City's Outdoor Lighting Code (Section 11.73). 6. All signage must meet the requirements of the City's Sign Code (Section 4.20). 7. This approval is subject to all other state, federal, and local ordinances, regulations, or laws with authority over this development. 8. A final design plan shall be reviewed by the City prior to Final Plan approval. Unofficial City Council Minutes -5- January 6, 2015 4C. Public Hearing - Preliminary PUD Plan Struthers Parkinson's Center - continued In addition the Council makes the following findings pursuant to City Code Section 11.55, Subd. 5(E): 1. Quality Site Planning. The PUD plan is tailored to the specific characteristics of the site and achieves a higher quality of site planning and design than generally expected under conventional provisions of the ordinance. 2. Preservation. The PUD plan preserves and protects substantial desirable portions of the site's characteristics, open space and sensitive environmental features including steep slopes, trees, scenic views, creeks, wetlands, and open waters. 3. Efficient - Effective. The PUD plan includes efficient and effective use (which includes preservation) of the land. 4. Compatibility. The PUD Plan results in development compatible with adjacent uses and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and redevelopment plans and goals. 5. General Health. The PUD plan is consistent with preserving and improving the general health, safety and general welfare of the people of the City. 6. Meets Requirements. The PUD plan meets the PUD Intent and Purpose provision and all other PUD ordinance provisions. 4D Public Hearing - Ordinance #536 - Amending Section 11.03 Definitions, Section 11.35 Light Industrial Zoning District and 11.36 Industrial regarding Recycling Centers Associate Planner Goellner presented the staff report and answered questions from Council. Planning Manager Zimmerman and City Attorney Barnard answered questions from Council. Mayor Harris opened the public hearing. No one came forward. Mayor Harris closed the public hearing. There was Council discussion regarding the proposed amendments to the Zoning Code for the following sections: 11.03 Definitions, 11.35 Light Industrial Zoning District and 11.36 Industrial regarding Recycling Centers. MOTION made by Mayor Harris to table the item to January 20, 2015, Council meeting. Since the item was not seconded, the motion was withdrawn. MOTION made by Council Member Snope, seconded by Council Member Clausen to adopt Ordinance #536, Amending Section 11.03 Definitions, Section 11.35 Light Industrial Zoning District regarding Recycling Centers upon a vote being taken the following voted in favor of: Clausen, Schmidgall, Fonnest, Snope and Harris and the following voted against: none and the motion carried. 6. NEW BUSINESS 6A. Reset Meeting Dates MOTION made by Council Member Snope , seconded by Council Member Fonnest to reset the following City Council meeting dates: August 4 to Wednesday, August 5, September 15 to Wednesday, September 16 and November 3 to Wednesday, November 4 and the motion carried unanimously. Unofficial City Council Minutes -6- January 6, 2015 6B. Council Assignment - Mayor Pro Tem MOTION made by Council Member Clausen, seconded by Council Member Fonnest to nominate Council Member Snope as Mayor Pro Tem for 2015 and the motion carried unanimously. 6C. First Consideration - Ordinance #537 - Amending Chapter 5: Alcoholic Beverages Licensing and Regulations City Clerk Luedke presented the staff report and answered questions from Council. City Attorney Barnard answered questions from Council. MOTION made by Council Member Schmidgall, seconded by Council Member Snope to adopt on first consideration Ordinance #537, Amending Chapter 5: Alcoholic Beverages Licensing and Regulation to add an Off-Sale Small Brewer License, On-Sale Small Brewer Taproom License, and Brewpub Off-Sale Malt Liquor License upon a vote being taken the following voted in favor of: Harris, Schmidgall, Fonnest, Snope and Clausen and the following voted against: none and the motion carried. 6D. First Consideration - Ordinance #538 - Amending the 2015 Master Fee Schedule to include the New Liquor License Fees. City Clerk Luedke presented the staff report. MOTION made by Council Member Fonnest, seconded by Council Member Schmidgall to adopt on first consideration Ordinance # 538, Amending the 2015 Master Fee Schedule to include New Liquor License Fees associated with the new Liquor License types upon first consideration upon a vote being taken the following voted in favor of: Harris, Schmidgall, Fonnest, Snope and Clausen and the following voted against: none and the motion carried. 6E. Announcements of Meetings Some Council Members may attend a Bottineau Station Area Neighborhood Meeting on January 7, 2015, at 6 pm at the Courage Kenny Rehabilitation Institute. Some Council Members may attend the 2015 Bassett Creek Restoration Project meeting on January 8, 2015, from 5 to 7 pm in the Council Chambers. Open for Business will have office hours at the City of Golden Valley on January 9, 2015, from 9 to 11 am in the Council Conference Room. A Joint City Council and Planning Commission meeting regarding the Subdivision Study will be held on January 12, 2015, at 7 pm. The next Housing and Redevelopment Authority meeting will be held on January 13, 2015, at 6:30 pm. The next Council/Manager meeting will be held on January 13, 2015, immediately following the HRA meeting. Some Council Members may attend the Bottineau Planning Advisory Committee meeting on January 14, 2015, at the University Research Outreach and Engagement Center. Unofficial City Council Minutes -7- January 6, 2015 6E. Announcements of Meetings - continued Some Council Members may attend the Calvary Lutheran Church "Sweet Potato Pie Event" on January 18, 2015, from 2 to 4 pm. City Offices will be closed on January 19, 2015, in observance of Martin Luther King, Jr. Day. The next City Council Meeting will be held on January 20, 2015, at 6:30 pm. 6F. Mayor and Council Communication Assistant Manager Knauss reviewed the items on the January 13, 2015, Council/Manager meeting. Mr. Zimmerman provided information regarding the upcoming Joint City Council/Planning Commission meeting being held on January 12, 2015, regarding the Subdivision Study. Council Member Fonnest provided information on this year's Caring Youth Award Program and the Seven Dreams Education Foundation Bird Bash event which will be held on February 21, 2015. Mayor Harris recommended Council perform an annual review for the City Manager in an Executive Session. Mayor Harris stated a neighborhood meeting was scheduled for January 29, 2015, but will be canceled due to a conflict with the METRO Blue Line Extension Station Area Planning Open House. 7. Adjournment MOTION made by Council Member Schmidgall, seconded by Council Member Snope, and the motion carried unanimously to adjourn the meeting at 9:54 pm. Shepard Harris, Mayor ATTEST: Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk IIW I ,0ql �IJ ^"w 1p 0,4 I�lll �ll �� � u 000 � ° I ry 'fin 0001'' 111111° I� ;"J"J";"i": . � �4 � � u PI ! 000"\\)11 esIW '111111 � . U� ����� I � �F �� 0000'y I 000000„ 00 10 loo! rrr9' umgllul IIU I��I(I m IRS�a I II�III I�� IIIIIUIIIPa inan r� �o llllllI � I art IIS I������s�I'���t IIIU�IIIIII >r �IIIINVuull)� �I a" 11 iii nl 763-593-8013� 763-593-8109 c(fax, INNINNINNINNINNINNINNINNINNINNININININININNINNINNINNINNINNINNINNINNINNINNINNINNINNINNINNINNINNINNINNINNINNINNINNINNINNINNINNINNINNINNINNINNINNINNINNINNINNINNININININININ Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting January 20, 2015 Agenda Item 3. B. Approval of City Check Register Prepared By Sue Virnig, Finance Director Summary Approval of the check register for various vendor claims against the City of Golden Valley. Attachments • Document sent via email Recommended Action Motion to authorize the payment of the bills as submitted. 140,, ��. 0 idN -I1 Gl, ll,U V IoVio : i Mk ( 4 0Al ���� iiiiiii1l00 0 z,. 1iiiiil00 IµpIylI Ill ulI 1160 City d ,I i ation,/CoI I 763-593-3991 --S" 3 9(fax) . mNNNNNNNmmNmmNmmNmmNmmNmmNmmNmmNmmNmmNNmNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting January 20, 2015 Agenda Item 3. C. 1. Solicitor's License - Custom Remodeler's Inc. Prepared By Judy Nally, Administrative Assistant Summary As per City Code, any individual or group intending to go door-to-door within the City selling products, taking orders or soliciting for business or donations must be licensed by the City to do so. Attachments • Peddler/Solicitor License Application (2 pages) Recommended Action Motion to approve the solicitor's license for Custom Remodeler's Inc. Application and fee must be submitted to the City Manager's Office the Wednesday prior to the City Council Meeting. Council Meetings are normally held the first and third Tuesday of each month. PEDDLER/SOLICITOR LICENSE APPLICATION 5 0 " T : n ode Valley City Council Fee Paid: $ _ 7800 Golden Valley Road Number of Persons: Golden Valley, MN 55427 Type of License: Peddler elicitor (circle o - Enclose the sum of$} ____.„ _.for (number) peddlers/solicitors as required by City Code of the City of Golden Valley and have complied with all the requirements of said Code necessary for obtaining this license. ut dp_c(eri Tf-AL. (Business or Individual Name or Organization to be Licensed) d ei (MN Business ID or FEIN (Federal ID)for Business Licenses Define Business ;It On (Corporation, Proprietorship, Partnership, Non-Profit, State of Incorporation or Individual) 4/26((e) DriVC (Address) iIc'o / 1(c ,2/flItJ City, State and Zip Code) .61/0? 70? (Telephone Number, including Area Code) NOW, THEREFORE, cR hereby he eby makes application for . ., (Applicant Name) I hi period of 7 through 121 , subject to the conditions and provisions of said City Code. m (Signature s `pplic Principal Officer) Description of goods or services for sale (include prices) or indicate if soliciting donations. If more space is needed, attach additional sheets (be specific): cC-171' Pf, Roo+ 511)1q1(ktP65 0-S3( ()0-°( NOTE: If the products for sale are changed or modified, you must give the City complete information regarding such change or modification. List the names and addresses of EACH person who will be peddling or soliciting on behalf of said organization in the City, or, in the alternative, the name, address and telephone number or numbers where a responsible person of said organization will maintain a list of names and addresses of all persons engaged in peddling or soliciting in the City: _ l. C(0) ., 6 on (If more space is needed, attach additional sheets) e 5 STATE OF iljt11 ;1' %,I ss. COUNTY F IVEt*i? /,--) 1 im,, A) of J5 1 i1` Officer/Individual) (Name of Organization) being first duly sworn, depose and say that all the foregoing information is true to his/her own knowledge wedge except as to matters therein stated on information and belief, and as to such matters, he/she believes them to be true. cc.".120 - 11,,...,..,,_. Signature of Iicant/Principal Officer) Subscribed and sworn to before me this 121 /k- / dayof &' 20 if, , ' Purr 6 . . I (Signature) 44 IFF'' iv tii` ,I • F ; I F :41 4 i 2020 x --4 MINUTES Human Rights Commission (HRC) City of Golden Valley 7800 Golden Valley Road Golden Valley, MN 55427 Council Conference Room November 25, 2014 Commissioners present: Teresa Martin, Chair Jonathan Burris Adam Buttress Simon Gotlieb Carla Johnson Michael Pristash Sue Phelps Andrew Ramlet Commissioners absent: Payton Perkins City Council Liaison: Andy Snope Staff: Chantell Knauss, Assistant City Manager The meeting was convened at 6:03 pm by Chair Martin. introductions The City Council Liaison, Commissioners and staff introduced themselves. Approval of October 23, 2014 Regular Meeting Minutes Motion b Commissioner Pristash, second by Commissioner Johnson to approve the October 23, 2014 minutes. Motion carried 6-1, Commissioner Burris dissenting. Council Updates No updates were presented. Old Business Review of Golden Valley League of Women Voters G LW and HRC "Toward a More Perfect Union: Talkin• About the Constitution " P•ualit event held Thursday November ZQZQ1roQkview Grill This was the third of three "Toward a More Perfect Union: Talking About the Constitution," events by the GVL 'V . Vice Chair Johnson and Commissioner Burris attended the event. Vice-Chair Johnson was invited by the GVLWV to give a brief explanation of the HRC and what it does to those in attendance. The program began with a viewing of the applicable portion of the TPT TV video of the Constitution. There were approximately 27 people in attendance, primarily made up of GL Vmembers and their family and friends. Johnson and Burris served as recorders for the small group discussion on the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution (14th Amendment). Human Rights Commission November 25, 2014 Meeting Minutes Page 1 of Sweet Potato Crnfrt Pie lJ date Chair Martin and Vice Chair Johnson met with Ms. McGee and explained the concerns HRC had with promoting the proposal via the HRC. illls. McGee understood the HRD's limitations and will be moving forward with the proposal through other avenues. 2Q15_W rk Plan Knauss reviewed the Work Plan process. Some suggestions that were brought up were: • Work with HRC's from Crystal, Robbinsdale, New Hope on Joint HRC program on Genocide that will be held in April 2015. Chair Martin and Commissioner Pristash volunteered to serve as liaisons to the committee working on this. • Invite a representative from the Golden Valley Police Department to a future HRC meeting to discuss a specific topic (to be determined). Commissioner Buttress excused himself from the meeting at 6:35pm. Commissioner Gotlieb arrived at the meeting at :3 pm. After much discussion, it was the consensus of the HRC to focus the 2015 HRC Conversations Series on human sex trafficking. • Invite the Blank Slate Theatre and HRC host the live theatre production of their play, "Bottom" about human sex trafficking. Commissioner Phelps will follow-up to see if there is a charge to bring the play to Golden Valley. • Knauss will check with Brookview Community Center for availability for the dates: Thursday, May 14 15t Choice) and Thursday, May 7 (2nd Choice). • HRC will consider the dates of Thursdays, October 8 or 22, 2015 for the second of the 2015 HRC Conversation Series on human sex trafficking, possibly to consist of viewing of a video and expert panelist discussion. • Everyone needs to research documentary-type videos (approximately 10-20 minutes in length) on the topic of human sex trafficking for the Commission's consideration to use for the October event. • Everyone needs to think of possible subject matter experts that may be able to serve as panelists for the October HRC Conversations event. it was the consensus of the Commission to again sponsor the September Day of Service Remembrance at Second Harvest Heartland in 2015. Because September 11 falls on a Friday, the event will be scheduled for the evening of Thursday, September 10, 2015. New Business Discuss_Bill Hobbs Human Rights Award Nomination Deadline it was the consensus of the Commission to solicit nominations for the Bill Hobbs Award with a deadline of February 20, 2015. The nominations will be reviewed at the H C's regular February meeting. Knauss will make sure the nomination information is updated on the City's website. Review Draft 2014 Annual Report Commissioners reviewed the draft 2014 Annual Report and it was their consensus that Chair Martin present it and the 2015 Work Plan to the City Council at their Council/Manager Meeting on January 13, 2015. Human Rights Commission November 25,2014 Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 3 Communications Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Holiday Breakfast 'infinite Hope, Meaningful Action" Monday lan_uar 19, 2015 Commissioners discussed if they should host a viewing event similar to the 2014 one that was co-sponsored with Spirit of Hope Church. Knauss explained the timing is late in getting any publicity in the City News Newsletter and other outlets. Another idea to consider for next year is if the Commission is interested in purchasing tickets for an entire table for this event and allowing Golden Valley residents on a first-come RSVP basis be the H RC's guests at the event. If Commissioners are interested in attending the event, please let Knauss know and she will order tickets for those Commissioners. Adjourn illioion by Commissioner Pristash, second by Commissioner Johnson to adjourn the meeting at 7:56 pm. Motion carried 7-0. Follow-up Items: • Commissioner Phelps will follow-up to see if there is a charge to bring the play, "Bottom," by Blank Slate Theatre to Golden Valley. • Everyone needs to research documentary-type videos (approximately 10-20 minutes in length) on the topic of human sex trafficking for the Commission's consideration to use for the October event. • Everyone needs to think of possible subject matter experts that may be able to serve as panelists for the October HRC Conversations event. • Vice Chair Johnson to reserve the volunteer block with Second Harvest Heartland for Thursday, September 10, 2015. • Knauss will provide copies of the Human Rights Commission by-laws to all HRC Commissioners via email. Teresa Martin, Chair ATTEST. Chantell Knauss, Staff Liaison Approved by HRC: December 18, 2014 Human Rights Commission November 25,2014 Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 3 JOINT WATER COMMISSION MINUTES Golden Valley - Crystal - New Hope Meeting of December 3, 2014 The Golden Valley — Crystal — New Hope Joint Water Commission meeting was called to order at 1:31 p.m. in the City of Golden Valley Council Conference Room. Commissioners Present Anne Norris, City Manager, Crystal Kirk McDonald, City Manager, New Hope Staff Present Tom Mathisen, City Engineer, Crystal Randy Kloepper, Utilities Superintendent, Crystal Wayne Houle, Acting City Engineer, Crystal Bob Paschke, Director of Public Works, iew Hope Bernie Weber, Operations Manager, New v Hope Dave Lemke, Utilities Supervisor, New Hope Chantell Knauss, Assistant City Manager, City of Golden Valley Sue Virnig, Finance Director, Golden Valley Marc Nevinski, Physical Development Director, Golden Valley Jeff Oliver, City Engineer, Golden Valley Bert Tracy, Public Works Maintenance Supervisor, Golden Valley Kelley Janes, Utilities Supervisor, Golden Valley Pat Schutrop, Administrative Assistant, Golden Valley Others Present Marcia Glick, City Manager, City of Robbinsdale Minutes of October 28, 2014 Meetin MOVED by McDonald and seconded by Norris to approve the minutes of the October 28, 2014 meeting as presented. Motion carried. 36-inch I atermain Emergency Repair Update The results from the testing done by Pure Technologies revealed the 36-inch pipe was more compromised than originally expected. At the October 28, 2014 JWC meeting, the commissioners directed the TAG to select a consultant to review and design the repairs. The expectation is to have the pipe built and online by mid-summer. The TAC prepared a Request for Qualifications and forwarded to the following three qualified local consultants: TKDA SEH, Inc. Bolton & Menk, Inc. After review of the proposals received and interviews with each consultant team, the TAC agreed that Bolton & Menk had the knowledge and experience necessary to complete the project. Joint Water Commission December 3, 2014 Page 2 of 3 Bolton & Menk submitted a letter of understanding for the work associated with performing the preliminary design, final design/bidding and construction services. The bidding process is scheduled for mid-February 2015. They are proposing to start the survey work immediately to gather technical data on the pipe, The fee for this initial phase of the work is estimated not to exceed $58,000. Robbinsdale City Manager Marcia Glick asked if when the survey work is done, consideration be taken into account the position of the Fobbinsdale sanitary sewer located beneath the waterrain and the possibility of replacing that line due to the possible impacts of installing a new line over an older system. Because of the existing situation, ideally the infrastructure concerns can be coordinated between Robbinsdale and Crystal. Mathisen said that there are different methods of rehabilitating the Robbinsdale pipe versus excavation and replacement. The cured-in-place pipelining is one alternative that should be evaluated. The TAG will work with Robbinsdale to accomplish the long-term solutions. MOVED by McDonald and seconded by Norris to approve the proposal from Bolton Menk, Inc. for work associated with the preliminary design, final design/bidding and constructions services associated with the 36-inch PCCP line repair/replacement project in the amount not to exceed $58.000, Motion carried. McDonald suggested the JWC do a media release on the status of this project. Golden Valley Assistant City Manager Chantell Knauss will work with the Golden Valley and New Hope Communications will work together in preparation of the release. Emergeo r � up Water Supply Project Update Constructionnof the Golden Valley well will be delayed until the 36-inch pipe repair is completed. Crystal started test pumping both of its wells separately and together. When tested together, one of the well generators failed. That test will be redone. llathisen said this is not a concern and is part of the data gathering process for the wellhead protection program, Crystal has not received any reports of water drawdown from the City of Fobbinsdale as a result of its well testing. The New Hope well improvements will be part of the piping bid package. Count ad 9 Project Update The segment ent of County Road 9 where the new 24-inch pipe was installed affecting Robbinsdale and Crystal is now open to traffic. The piling issue has been worked out except for one section that will be done next year, Other Business 1. Bob Paschke said that Sprint has requested an extension to its lease and has modified the lease agreement to include an annual rate increase of 3% versus the annual increase based on the Consumer Price Index, The revised lease agreement will need to be reviewed by the JWC's attorney, Sprint has agreed to pay for the prorated cost of the extension and legal fees when the invoice is received. MOVED by Norris and seconded by McDonald authorizing the City of New Hope to forward the revised lease agreement with Sprint to the attorney for review. Motion carried, Joint WatrCoramission December 3, 2014 Page 3 of 3 2. Today is Tom 11 athis n's last MC meeting. He will be retiring from the City of Crystal as its Director of Public Works/City Engineer on December 31, 2014. MOVED by McDonald and seconded by Norris to formally extend sincere appreciation to Tom Mathisen for his work and service to the Joint Water Commission. Motion carried. Next Meeting The next meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, January 7, 2015, at 1:30 . Adjournment Vice Chair Norris adjourned the meeting at 'I:58 p.m. Anne Norris, Vice Chair ATTEST: Pat S h tr p, Recording Secretary -- GOLDEN VALLEY OPEN SPACE & RECREATION COMMISSION Meeting Minutes November 24, 2014 RUBY S` II EiNBERG SCHEID PARK PRESENTATION 6:45 PM - Manager's Conference !Room' Weinberg, 10 year old resident of Golden Valley and 4th grade student at Meadowbrook Elementary School, presented her ideas for adding more exciting equipment for older kids at Scheid Park. Weinberg said she selected Scheid Park because she really likes it and wants to make it more fun for kids to spend time there while their siblings are playing sports. Some of her ideas include: a variety of more exciting swings, something for spinning, higher and longer climbing frame, bouncing structure and some adult features as well. Commission members asked her if she has visited other parks and what she liked about those parks. She shared likes and dislikes. Birno asked for a copy of her ideas to save for future reference. JOINT MEETING WITH ENVIRONMENTAL ENTAL COMMISSION 7:00 PM - Council Conference Rooriii See attached minutes. OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING Call to Order Mattison called the meeting to order at 6:45 . 2. Roll Call: -------- - Present: Commissioners Roger Bergman, John Cornelius, Kelly Kuebelbeck, Bob Mattison, Gillian Rosenquist, Jerry Sandler, Dawn Speitz and Dan Steinberg. Director of Parks and Recreation, Rick Birno; and Brookview Golf Course Manager, Ben Disch. Absent: Commissioner Anne Saffert. 3. Approval of Minutes_- Oct- October_2L2014 Bergman proposed the following change to the minutes: Roll Call - "Area" added to Golden Valley Lions Park residents, so to read, Golden Valley Lions Park area residents. Mattison proposed the following change to the minutes: Tennis Court Windscreen Discussion/Recommendation -last sentence changed "prohibit" to "would impact, " and added "on tennis courts," so to read, Mattison said there are no city codes that would impact the use of windscreens on tennis courts in Golden Valley. MOTION: Moved by Bergman and seconded by Sandier to approve the amended October 27, 2014 meeting minutes. Motion carried unanimously. Minutes of the Open Space and Recreation Commission November 24, 2014 Page 2 MOTION: Moved by Bergman and seconded by Sandier to approve the amended October 27, 2014 meeting minutes. Motion carried unanimously. 4. Accept Teen committee Minutes - Iplernber 22, 21.4 MOTION: Moved by Sandier and seconded by Spelt to accept the Teen Committee minutes from the September 22, 2014 meeting. Motion carried unanimously. 5. Metro Blue Line Extension Update Steinberg presented Rosenquist's notes. He said an Open House was held on November 12, 2014 to discuss Penn Avenue plans and the four stations proposed for LRT. Ideas for surrounding development were presented. Attendance was over 150 people. Residents expressed concern about the proposed line and the Golden Valley Road station, both about impact to the environment and the proposed development where private residents and fire stations are now. As a result, the Committee requested another open house, which will be held on December 4 for Golden Valley residents. The Committee meets again on December 17 and January 14. An open house for the four stations will be held on January 29. 6. Golf course Season date Dischp an ave update on the 2014 season. He said the season began on April 9 9 with a 72 degrees day and closed on November 6. On June 9, due to flooding from excessive rain, the course closed for 6 days, which cost close to $75, 000 in revenue. Disch said the course obtained a full liquor license on June 2, 2014. He said the food and beverage revenue was at an all- time high this year at $250000. He also announced that the Grill will be open this winter Friday through Sunday with a select winter menu. Disch said the new Lawn Bowling course opened on Thursday, August 14 and has been a huge success. He said they hosted 25-30 corporate events in their 19-week season. He has had many calls already for the 2015 season. He said lawn bowling has brought in many people they have never seen before and it's opened up an opportunity to non-golfers. Disch said the Regulation 18-hole course had 34,000 rounds, The Par 3 continues to underperform with only about 12,000 rounds this year, where it used to be 30,090+. He said one issue is that it's been a modified 7-hole course for 2 years due to course flooding. Misch said rates for the Regulation 18-hole course will be increasing for the first time in six seasons to $37 from $35 a round. 7. Community Center Update Kuebelbeck gave details on the proposed Community Center design, which will be presented to the City Council on December 9. She said the proposed plan could cost around $38 million. 8. diornment MOTION:MOVED by Bergman and seconded by Sandler to adjourn at 9:15 . Motion carried unanimously. Bob Mattison, Chair ATTEST: Sheila Van Sl un, Administrative Assistant IIIL } If ,*} IIII'T l 2-, .}. lmNlllJ?NiNilfl'fl V a r o,Rj^I.!WY dll Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission q VmV Dlwarw4l lt,i"III'i tlirukf,.ilwiub uY'. Minutes of Regular Meeting November 19,2014 GoldenValle), City Ball,8:30 a.m. Commissioners and Staff Present: Crystal Commissioner Guy Mueller,Vice Robbinsdale Not represented Chair Golden Valley Commissioner Stacy Hosehka, St. Louis Park Commissioner Jim de Lambert,Chair Treasurer Medicine Commissioner Clint Carlson Administrator Administrator Laura Jester Lake Minneapolis Commissioner Michael Welch Attorney Charlie LeFevere, Kennedy&Graven Minnetonka Commissioner Jacob Millner, Engineer Karen Chandler, Barr Engineering Co. Secretary New Hope Commissioner John Elder Recorder Amy Herbert Plymouth Commissioner Ginny Black Technical 1dvisor~y Committee (TMembers/ them Attendees Present: Derek Ache,TAC, City of Plymouth Rick Johnson,New Hope Resident Sandy Baines', Friends of Northwood Lake Chris Long,TAC, City ofNew Hope Marge Beard, City of Plymouth Councilmember Linda Loomis, Chair, BCWMC Plan SteeringCmtee Elect John Byrnes, City of Plymouth Tom Mathisen, TAC,City ofCrystal Lois Eberhart, TAC, City of Minneapolis Jeff Oliver,TAC, City of Golden Valley John O'Toole,Alternate Commissioner, City of Medicine Andrea Feldman,New Hope Resident Lake Harvey Feldman,New Hope Resident Bob Paschke, City of New Hope Erick Francis,TAC,City of St. Louis Park Susan Rader, City of New Hope Christopher Case, Golden Valley Resident Jim Spevarcek,, Friends of Northwood Lake Jere Gwin-Lenth,Friends of Northwood Lake Joanne Spevarcek, Friends of Northwood Lake Mary Gwin-Lenth, Friends of Northwood Lake Liz Stout, City of Minnetonka BCWMC November 19, 2014, Heeting finut s David Tobelmann,Alternate Commissioner,City of Plymouth Robert White,Friends of Northwood Lake Doug Williams, Friends of Northwood Lake Scott Wylie, Golden Valley Resident L CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL On Wednesda>,November 19, 2014,at 8:35 a.m. in the Council Conference room at Golden Valley City Hall, Chair de Lambert called to order the meeting of the Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission (BCWMC)and asked for roll call to be taken. The Cities of Minneapolis and Robbinsdale were absent from the roll call. 2. CITIZEN FORUM ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS No items were brought forward. 3.AGENDA Commissioner Black moved to approve the agenda. Commissioner Elder seconded the motion. Upon a vote,the motion carried 7-0 [Cities of Minneapolis and Robbinsdale absent from vote]. 4. CONSENT AGENDA Commissioner Mueller asked for more detail on item 4D—Approval to utilize 2014 West Metro Water Alliance W1 WA Funds for 2015 Special WMWA Project.Administrator Jester provided information on the WMWA request. She explained that WMWA's contract with the BCWMC, and other participating organizations, via the Shingle Creek Watershed Management Commission requires that each member organization approves special projects. She said that WMWA is seeking approval of the special project"5,000 acres by 2025"to begin in 2015. Administrator Jester stated that WMWA is also seeking BCWMC approval of the BCWMC funding the project in the amount of$1,500 from its 2014 budget. Commissioner Mueller moved to approve the Consent Agenda. Commissioner Black seconded the motion. Upon a vote,the motion carried 7-0 [Cities of Minneapolis and Robbinsdale absent from vote]. [The following items were approved as part of the Consent Agenda: the October 8,2014, Commission Workshop minutes,the October 16,2014, Commission Meeting minutes,the monthly financial report,the payment of the invoices, Approval to Utilize 2014 West metro Water Alliance(WMWA) Funds for 2015 Special WMWA Project, Approval of Reimbursement ement Request from City of Minneapolis for Main Stem Bassett Creek Restoration Project—Golden Valley Road to Irving Avenue R12 ,Approval of Resolution Designating the City of Golden Valley as Responsible for Implementing the Twin Lake In-Lake Alum Treatment Project and Approving an Agreement for Implementation(TW-2),Approval of Golden Valley Senior Living Project,Golden Valley]. The general and construction account balances reported in the Financial Report prepared for the November 18, 2014, meeting are as follows: 2 B t,JM 1\1c—ember 19, 2014, ii .t incj rlinutes Checking Account Balance $583,397.53 TOTAL GENERAL FUND BALANCE $583,397.53 TOTAL CASH& INVESTMENTS ON- $3,011,653.57 HAND (11;12/14) CIP Projects Levied—Budget Remaining ($2,699,071,72) Closed Projects Remaining Balance ($312,581.85) 2013 Anticipated Tax Levy Revenue $8,756.59 2014 Anticipated Tax Levy Revenue $428,419.50 Anticipated Closed Project Balance $749,757,94 [CommissionerWelch arrives.] 5.BUSINESS A. Consider Approval of Revised Feasibility Study for Northwood Lake Improvement Project (NL-.1): Engineer Chandler reminded the Commission that at its September meeting it reviewed the project and feasibility study and at that time it was interested in options A and C. She said that option A was the storm water reuse system option and option C is the traditional wet retention pond located on a City-owned parcel located west ofJordan Avenue, not in Northwood Park. Engineer Chandler said that the Commission was concerned about the cost and wanted to hear more from the City about what funding it was willing to contribute to the project and to hear more about the intangible costs. Engineer Chandler reported that the City of New Hope has offered to put in $205,000 toward the project, meaning that the Commission would fund the remaining cost. She added that the City of New Hope has applied for a $400,000 grant from the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR) for the project as well as a$50,000 grant from Hennepin County through its Natural Resources grant program. Engineer Chandler said that the City would find out in January if it has been awarded the BWSR grant and should find out this week if it has been awarded the Hennepin County grant. Engineer Chandler explained that if the Commission selected options A and C and fully funded the project, the Commission would be responsible for funding in the amount of$1,145,000. She said that this cost to the Commission would be reduced if the City is awarded one or both grants. Mr.1 athisen asked what the cost would be for options B and C. Ms. Chandler responded $284,720. 3 BCINTLI No—ember 19, 2014, Meeting Minutes Chair de Lambert asked for more information on the intangible benefits of the options. Engineer Chandler responded with details on the use of Northwood Lake Park by the residents. Mr. Paschke provided more information. Engineer Chandler added that the New Hope City Council had discussed this project at two different Council meetings since the Commission's last meeting. Alternate Commissioner Tobelmann remarked that options B and C would meet the need and options A and C would have some intangible benefits, so the cost of the intangible benefits is approximately $1,000,000. He noted that a$1M price tag for intangibles seemed inconsistent with the BCWNIC Plan. Commissioner Black said that she would like more information on the grants and wondered how the project would be funded if grants were not received. Administrator Jester noted that if the Commission is to do this project, the Commission needs to add it to its CIP. She talked about the timing of the Plan amendment process. Commissioner Elder said that the City of New Hope is fully developed and the City doesn't have the ability to add green space. He said that the City Council would like to implement this project and recognizes that if the grants do not come through, there could be some additional costs and the City would need to discuss it. Commissioner Black moved approval of Commission costs of up to $1,400,000 for the Northwood Lake Improvement Project and to add it onto the Commission's UUP. Commissioner Elder seconded the motion. There was discussion. Commissioner ner Carlson asked about the status of the Plymouth project that had been on hold due to the consideration of the number of trees that were slated for removal. Mr. Asche gave an update and said it will be back in front of the Commission at its December meeting. Commissioner Hoschka said that she would not like to see the Commission fund the Northwood project up to the amount of$1.4 million. She said that she sees a lot of benefit to the City ofI New Hope for doing both options A and C but not a lot of additional benefit to the watershed by implementing these options in terms of the number of additional pounds of phosphorous removed. Commissioner Welch remarked that the Commission has a tendency to put off decisions, but he feels that the decision is in front of the Commission now. He said he understands why the Commission would want to consider a conditional approval and wait to hear about the grants, but the question on the table won't change. Commissioner Welch said that the question is: will the Commission pay for non-water related costs of a project. He stated that he did not think that the staff memo on this topic addressed how the project serves any innovative Commission goal and said that the reasons offered in the memo regarding support for moving forward with options A and C do not tip him in favor of them. Commissioner Welch added that he is struggling with this item because he really wants to see a project done for Northwood Lake but has concerns as mentioned. There was discussion. Mr. Long provided more information about the proposed project sites and the soils at the sites. Commissioner Hoschka remarked that she is uncomfortable with putting $1.4 million in the Commission's CIP because it sets up the expectation that the Commission will select options A and C. 4 B '1II No:ember 19, 2014, Ileeting 1iiriutes Administrator Jester reported that the City of New Hope has communicated that it would not move forward exclusively with option B and noted that the Commission's practice has been to fully fund projects instead of cost-sharing projects. Commissioner Welch commented that this could set a precedent in which the cities pick the Commission projects and then the Commission is placed in the uncomfortable situation of having to say yay or nay to them. Alternate Commissioner Tobelmann said the Commission needs to be careful about allowing cities to overlay intangible benefits on projects and expecting the Commission to pay for them. Mr. Long provided more information on why the City of New Hope would not move ahead with only option B. He explained that the size of the pond in option B is too large for the City to maintain and would need to contract out the maintenance. He described that when maintenance cannot be done by the City, the ponds can become an eyesore. Several ideas were offered to the City ofNew Hope of other projects that could be done, such as constructing the project in different areas in and around the park. Administrator Jester said she did have a conversation with Hennepin County staff about the possibility of a $1.4 million levy and staff did comment that it would be a big increase and staff did not know how that would go over with the County Board. She remarked that construction costs are going up and it would be hard for the Commission to maintain the practice of levying $1 million per year unless it wants to do fewer or smaller projects. She said that her recommendation is that the Commission starts levying more than $1 million. Administrator Jester reported that the communication from County staff also suggested that the logical next step for the Commission is to seek taxing authority. Commissioner Carlson said that he thinks that sharing costs with cities as needed is a good concept and that it would be terrible if the Commission doesn't do exactly what New Hope wants, particularly if the city is contributing to the funding. There was a brief discussion of how much New Hope is offering to fund. Commissioner Elder reiterated that after discussions at two city council meetings,the City is offering $205,000. Commissioner Hoschka moved to amend the motion on the table so that the Commission would set the cost of the project at$745,000. Mr. LeFevere stated that rules require the CIP to identify not only the project cost but also the impact on government units, which in this case is what the Hennepin County levy might be. He pointed out that if the Commission specifies the project at$745,000 for the County levy and the other project funding does not come through,the Commission loses the opportunity to do this project unless the City steps in and provides the funding. Commissioner Black seconded the motion to amend her original motion. There was discussion. By call of roll,the motion failed 4-4 [City of Robbinsdale absent from vote]. City Ay Nay Abstain Absent Crystal - Mueller X 5 BOWNC ember 19, 2014, riec_ting rlinut es Golden Valley--Hoschka X I Medicine Lake-Carlson X Minneapolis—Welch X Minnetonka-Millner X New Hope---Elder X Plymouth-Black X Robbinsdale St. Louis Park---de Lambert Commissioner Black made the friendly amendment to her motion on the table so that the Commission would levy for the project up to$1.1 million. Commissioner Elder accepted the friendly amendment. Chair de Lara b rt asked if there were any objections to voting on the motion as amended by-Commissioner Black's friendly amendment.No objections were raised. By call of roll,the motion carried 6-2 [City of Robbinsdale dale absent from vote]. City Ay Nay Abstain Absent Crystal -Mueller X Golden Valley - Hoschka X Medicine Lake-Carlson X Minneapolis--Welch X Minnetonka- Milfiner X New Hope Elder X Plymouth- Black X Robbinsdale X St. Louis Park—de Lambert X At 10:00 a.m. Chair de Lambert called for a brief recess and during the recess recognized the contributions of outgoing Alternate Commissioner from St. Louis Park Justin Riss and outgoing TAC member from Crystal Tom Mathisen,who will be retiring from the City in December. At 10:10 a.m. Chair de Lambert called the 6 BcWII No—ember 19, 2014, fleeting IIinutes meeting back to order. B. Choose Options and Funding for 2016 Projects: Northwood Lake Improvement Project(NL-1)and Honeywell Pond Expansion BC-4) Administrator Jester reminded the Commission that at its September and October meetings it discussed funding options for the Honeywell Pond project in Golden Valley. She explained that the project came in with a higher cost estimate than anticipated,which further complicates the Commission's levy request for 2016 and 2017. She said that the Commission approved a motion to commit a preference for option 3, which is a combination of options 1 and 2—expansion of the Honeywell Pond and use of storm water for irrigation. Administrator Jester said that the Engineer's memo from the October meeting details the costs. Engineer Chandler provided more details about the project options and costs and explained that the City has offered to provide$450,000 toward the project.Administrator Jester stated that if the Commission chooses option 3, which is the City's preference,the cost to the Commission is$752,000.Administrator Jester said that today the Commission needs to choose an option and a funding amount. Mr. Oliver reported that the City of Golden Valley has applied for a grant to upgrade the adjacent sports fields. He said that if the City doesn't receive the grant,then the irrigation of the sports fields will not be undertaken. He said the City is not offering at this time irrigation for Honeywell property. Commissioner Black asked if the Commission would levy the$752,000 over one year or multiple years. Administrator Jester said that she has it slated for the 2016 levy and so is more than half of the total cost of the Northwood Lake project. She explained that this would bring the levy request for 2016 to$1.4 million. There was discussion of NAhether any of the Commission's CIP projects slated for 2017 could be moved to a later year(Mr. Ache noted it vias possible to move the 2017 CIP project to a different year), about the amount of total phosphorous that this project is estimated to remove and cost per pound of removal, and about remobilization costs if part of the project was delayed to a different year. Administrator Jester pointed out that option 3 doubles the amount of total phosphorous removed at an increase of 50%of the cost of the project. Commissioner Black moved to approve adding this project to the Commission's CIP in the amount of $752,000, which would support option 3. Commissioner Mueller seconded the motion. Upon a vote vote,the motion carried 7-0 [City of Minneapolis abstained from vote. City of Robbinsdale absent from vote]. Commissioner Carlson noted that he is in favor of doing what the City wants and would like to find a way for this process to be streamlined for easier and quicker discussions and decisions. C. Submit Request for Major Plan Amendment for Northwood Lake Improvement Project - IIand Honeywell Pond Expansion (BC-4) as Needed Administrator Jester said that she would like the Commission to direct staff to move forward with a major plan amendment to incorporate these projects into the Commission's GIP. Commissioner Black moved to direct staff to prepare and submit the major plan amendment request. Commissioner Carlson seconded the motion. Upon a vote,the motion carried Soo [City of Robbinsdale absent from vote]. Commissioner Welch remarked that he voted yes even though he disagrees with the action that the Commission previously took.He noted that he thinks that if the Commission says"no"to a project sooner rather than later,then the process of finding different options starts earlier and he thinks that the Commission needs to find different options for these projects. [Commissioner Hoschka departs the meeting] D. Approve Resolution of Appreciation for Services of Alternate Commissioner Justin Hiss 7 ECWWUUC November 19, 2014, fleeting Minutes Commissioner Welch moved to adopt the Resolution of Appreciation for Justin Riss. Commissioner Black seconded the motion, Capon a vote, the motion carried 7-0 [Cities of Golden Valley and Robbinsdale dale absent from vote]. [Commissioner Millner departs p the meeting.] E. Review-iew Draft 2015 BCWMC Next Generation Watershed Management Plan Administrator Jester announced that it is time, hopefully,to submit the draft plan for the 60-day review. She summarized the process the Commission has moved through to prepare the draft plan,including 24 Plan Steering Committee meetings and 4 Commission workshops. The Commission and staff discussed comments on the draft plan and worked their way through the highlighted subsections in Section 5—Implementation. There was discussion about when and how the"Requirements Document"would be updated and whether or not that would constitute a plan amendment, Commissioner Welch reminded the group that the draft Plan currently precludes the Commission from permitting and that cities must update their ordinances and enforce Commission standards. Counsel LeFevere concurred and noted the Commission's Joint Powers Agreement does not allow the Commission to be a permitting authority. He also noted the Commission must review local plans for compliance with the watershed plan and must evaluate the watershed plan's implementation regularly. Mr. Asche noted that the Commission and member cities work cooperatively together towards a shared goal,However, he noted the frustration in trying to implement policies of four different watershed organizations in addition to State requirements. There was discussion about the funding amounts included in some policies regarding the Flood Control Project. There was consensus to exclude actual dollar amounts and allow for flexibility, There were additional suggested changes to areas of the Implementation section. Commissioner Carlson moved to approve the plan as presented. The motion did not receive a second. Commissioner Welch also noted that when the draft Plan is revised to incorporate comments from reviewers, that the Implementation section be reviewed by the Commission in more detail. There was discussion about the Commission's role in recreation. Administrator Jester reported on the discussion at the October Commission workshop and her and Engineer Chandler's recommendation not to include language explicitly stating that the Commission will not implement projects with a recreation focus. Instead, language included in the Implementation section was added reinforcing the Commission's priorities of improving water quality and alleviating flooding. Administrator Jester also noted draft policy 61, which resulted from a recommendation from Friends of Bassett Creek. After some discussion,the Commission indicated approval of staffs recommendations on Policy 61 and on language regarding recreation. Commissioner Carlson moved to direct staff to make the changes discussed and to submit the plan for the 60- day review. Commissioner Elder seconded the motion Upon a vote,the motion carried 6-0 [Cities of Golden Valley, Minnetonka, and Robbinsdale absent from vote], F. Consider Administrator's Request to Attend MN Association of Watershed Districts (MWAD) Annual Conference Administrator Jester described the request and costs. Commissioner Black asked to which budget the costs would be allocated. Administrator Jester responded the Administrator's budget. Commissioner Welch mo.-ed to approve the request. Commissioner Elder seconded the motion. Upon a vote,the motion carried_6-0 [Cities of Golden Valley, Minnetonka, and Robbinsdale absent from vote]. 8 B UJII No—ember 19, 2014, U tin'' finut s 6. COMMUNICATIONS A. Administrator: No Administrator Communications other than written report in meeting materials. B. Chair: No Chair Communications C. Commissioners: i. Commissioner Welch reported that the City of Minneapolis is moving ahead with entering into a contract for the Main Stem stabilization project in Wirth Park. b. Commissioner Welch said that there is a Wirth Park long-term plan that the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board is seeking comments on through December 15. Commissioner Welch announced that the Friends of Bassett Creek is looking for someone to coordinate and run the Bassett Creek clean up on Earth Day. iv. Commissioner Carlson said that he would like the Commission to look at developing a policy on how the Commission can best cooperate with the cities so that the cities can implement the projects of their choice and contribute funds to those projects. D. TAC Members: No TAC Communications E. Committees: i. Administrative Services Committee: Commissioner Mueller reported that the Committee is looking into record keeping and digital records and is also working on forms for the evaluation of the Administrator and paid staff. Chair de Lambert added that the Committee is going to have a follow-up meeting in the next couple of weeks to keep working on these items. F. Legal Counsel: No Legal Communications G. Engineer: i. Review of Mississippi WMO Major Plan Amendment: Engineer Chandler reported that next month the Commission will see, hopefully on its Consent Agenda, comments or a report of no comments on the Mississippi WMO Major Plan Amendment that she will be reviewing. ii. Meeting with MDNR regarding BCWMC M comments on FEMA map: Engineer Chandler stated that the Commission received responses from the MDNR on the comment letter that the Commission submitted more than a year ago about the flood insurance maps. The Commission Engineer participated in a meeting with MDNR regarding the FEMA maps. 7. INFORMATION ONLY (Available at http://wymbassettcreekwmo.orgiMeetings/2014/2014- November/2014NovemberMeetingfacket.htm) A. Grant Tracking Summary and Spreadsheet B. Star Tribune Article About Sweeney Lake C. WCA Notices, Plymouth D. Thank you Letter from Children's Water Festival 9 B WtIC No—ember 19, 2014, Meeting Dinutes 8. ADJOURNMENT Chair de Lambert adjourned the Bassett Creek Watershed Management ommi i n Regular Meeting at 1 1:34 a.m. Amy Herbert, Recorder Date Secretary Date 10 C ami i v '0WIlIWA glIRI u, i+14,, pb II p 10 ti � I° p " �R III nlh ds 1 Ib b �O1 0000° U mI (00(0 11 000000000000 i00011114 Nlln0 11110 10 0 0 ;, III �! um0 IIIDi 100I °I000 000 ll p rrr ° Po !Hi rWo sDepartmeo t 763-593-8030/763-593-3988( a ) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting January 20, 2015 Agenda Item 3. E. 1. Purchase Ford Police and Fire Department Interceptor Utility Vehicles Prepared By Bert Tracy, Public Works Maintenance Manager Steve Loomis, Vehicle Maintenance Foreman Summary The proposed 2015-2019 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) includes $75,000 for the purchase of two marked police squad vehicles, equipment and setup (V&E-001, page 23). The Police Department is requesting to replace one marked squad vehicle at this time and one marked squad vehicle later this year. The 2015-2019 CIP also includes $34,000 for the purchase of one unmarked police vehicle (V&E-024, page 28) and $40,000 for the purchase of one fire vehicle equipment and setup (V&E-083, page 39). The Police Department vehicles scheduled for replacement meet replacement criteria set forth in the City's Vehicle Replacement Policy and Vehicle Condition Index (VCI). The VCI index is a tool utilized to assess all vehicles and equipment scheduled for replacement. Any vehicle/equipment scoring 28 points and above meets the category of"needs immediate consideration." Below is a summary of the rating: Vehicle Year/Make/Model VCI Index 813 Marked Squad 2010 Ford Crown Victoria Police Interceptor 28 899 Unmarked Squad 2006 Ford Crown Victoria Police Interceptor 28 The Fire Department vehicle scheduled for replacement, Unit 350 (V&E-083), is half-way through the useful vehicle life and will be reallocated as a Property Inspection vehicle for an additional five years or until the vehicle meets VCI replacement criteria. Vehicle Year/Make/Model VCI Index 350 Marked Fire Vehicle 2009 Ford Crown Victoria Police Interceptor 18 Replacement purchase of the three police interceptor utility vehicles will be made under the State of Minnesota Squad Vehicles Contract 83065, Nelson Auto Center, Fergus Falls, MN. The Minnesota Materials Management Division has awarded the following contract: Contract No. Item Vendor Amount 83065 2015 Ford Police Interceptor All- Nelson Auto Center $30,221.95 Wheel Drive SUV (Fire) 83065 Two 2015 Ford Police Marked Nelson Auto Center $33,521.95 Interceptor All-Wheel Drive SUV $33,521.95 TOTAL PURCHASE $97,265.85 2015 budget for proposed vehicles $111,500.00 Public Works staff has worked with Police and Fire staff in selection of the vehicles. The Police and Fire Chiefs concur with these vehicle acquisitions. Recommended Action Motion to approve purchase of three Ford Police Interceptor utility vehicles from Nelson Auto Center for the total purchase price of$97,265.85. From: Michael Herring Date: January 2, 2015 at 3:30:27 PM CST To: "Harris, Shep (SHarris_@gpidenvalleymri.gov Subject: Resigning from G VHSF Shep, First, after looking at my calendar for next year, came to the conclusion that have to resign from the commission. I thank you and the council for appointing me to the commission last year. Second, I'm not in favor of a single garbage service for the city. As Joannie stated at the last council meeting over half the people surveyed aren't in favor of such a move. Just my two cents! -Mike Michael Herring c v ot \111160k, , w 10C iw i°w ii p � 'H„ �II�pplIIiI��IIIC�II�I�II�IiI�iIiI��III�IIbbiIirrilIirr�ilI iiu JI oNom I l0000ghl ,- lI IIIIIIIIII0I �n�lllllllllllll�l�� 1111 VII' uu `�4u i�lr"luu;a uummD '""'SVP mfr N rrr rz '' P u i�puma i �i 1° N � I uuuuuuuum W �� � � SII � I V �IJepf.u: rtm m m i,mart Y������,�t p, ^IW' 763-593-803 /763-593-3988,(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting January 20, 2015 Agenda Item 3. G. Approve the Contract with the Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community for Removal Services for Brush, Soil, and Yard Waste Prepared By Bert Tracy, Public Works Maintenance Manager Mark Ray, PE, Street Maintenance Supervisor Summary The City currently disposes of the brush, soil, and yard waste with a number of vendors in a variety of ways. Staff is continually is looking for more efficient or cost-effective methods of disposal for these items. Brush waste is stockpiled at the 10th Avenue facility, then loaded and trucked to a number of locations in the west metro. One of the locations is the Mulch Store in St. Louis Park which charges $3 per cubic yard for disposal. However, another significant cost with brush waste removal is the time used by City staff and equipment in hauling the material. Soil waste has been stockpiled on various City properties. However, these locations are now at capacity and future material will need to be hauled away. Yard waste is generally hauled to the Maple Grove Yard Waste Site at a charge of$6.50 per cubic yard for disposal. Similar to the brush waste, another significant cost with yard waste removal is the time used by City staff and equipment in hauling the material. In 2013, staff experimented with bringing a brush grinder to 10th Avenue facility to grind up the brush before it was hauled away, which saves money on the contractor cost, as well as save staff time and equipment. Using this model for service delivery, staff reached out to the Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community which has an organics recycling facility in Shakopee. Through discussions with their staff, an agreement was reached where the City will be able to stockpile brush, soil, and yard waste at the 10th Avenue facility. When the piles are large enough, staff and equipment from the Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community will come and remove the material. This agreement will have a significant savings on staff cost and equipment time. It may also have a significant impact on saving costs associated with the Spring Brush Pickup because now instead of the contractor hauling the material to St. Paul, they will be able to bring it to 10th Avenue. This reduced trucking requirement should reduce the program costs and may help to bring in more contractors to bid on the work. Also, the City will be able to stockpile leaves at 10th Avenue from both street sweeping and the Fall Leaf Drop events. Not only will the City save money on disposal costs, but the contractor costs to haul the leaves to the disposal facility will also be reduced as they will only need to travel between Brookview Park and 10th Avenue. One final note, while the City will have a location for brush, soil, and yard waste disposal, staff is not recommending that the City create a drop site for residents. In addition to the need to staff the location for security, 10th Avenue is used for other operations as well and it would not be safe to have residents in the same location as large equipment operations. Finally, there is only one way into and out of the 10th Avenue facility. From a traffic operation standpoint, this will not work for a general public use drop site. Agreement Terms The agreement will be effective January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015. It includes the option to extend the agreement for up to two-year increments. Costs The following is a summary of the costs: Brush Waste Will be removed and disposed of at no cost to the City. The City will provide a loader operator and loader when resources allow at the City's expense. Soil Waste $500 mobilization fee each time the Contractor comes. All the equipment and hauling will be at the rate of$350 per hour maximum. The City will provide a loader operator and loader at the City's expense. If the City does not provide a loader and operator, the cost will be $450 per hour maximum. Yard Waste $3.50 per cubic yard when the City brings the material to the organics facility in Shakopee. $4.50 per cubic yard when the Contractor hauls the material from 10th and the City providing the loader equipment and operator. $5.25 per cubic yard when the Contractor hauls the material from 10th and provides the loader and operator. Emergency Services With the success of the storm debris removal in 2013, this contract also includes the provisions to provide the same brush waste removal at the agreement's rates. What this means is that no Council action will be needed to approve a contract for debris disposal should the City be hit by another storm. The Spring Brush Removal contract is also going to be modified in the future to include a provision for emergency brush removal. The intent is to have all the agreements in place prior to a storm occurring. Attachments • Contract with the Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community for the removal services for Brush, Soil, and Yard waste (10 pages) • Resolution Authorizing the Contract with the Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community for the removal services for Brush, Soil, and Yard waste (1 page) Recommended Action Motion to adopt the Resolution Authorizing the Contract with the Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community for the removal services for brush, soil, and yard waste. • DIE ENT FOR COMPREHENSIVE BRUSH, SOIL, AND YARD WASTE REMOVAL SERVICES AGREEMENT General Conditions and Terms This Agreement is made as of the315 of btLembtr 2.01q by and between the City of Golden Valley, hereinafter referred to as City, and the Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community, a federally recognized Indian Tribe, hereinafter referred to as Contractor, owner and operator of the Organics Recycling Facility located at 1905 Canterbury Road, Shakopee, Minnesota 55379. Preliminary Statement The purpose of this Agreement is to set forth terms and conditions for the provision of COMPREHENSIVE BRUSH, SOIL, AND YARD WASTE REMOVAL SERVICES by the Contractor for the City. The City and Contractor agree as follows: 1. Contract Documents The following documents shall be referred to as the "Contract Documents," all of which shall be taken together as a whole as the contract between the parties as if they were set verbatim and in full herein, and shall constitute this "Agreement": A. These General Conditions and Terms . Brush Waste and Yard Waste Collection and Removal Services, Exhibit evAn . Compensation, Exhibit "B" In the event of conflict among the provisions of the Contract Documents, the order in which they are listed above shall control in resolving any such conflicts, with Contract Document "A" having thfirst priority, and Contract Document "C" having thlast priority. 2. Compensation for Services Compensation for Services:The City agrees to pay the Contractor for services as described in Exhibit B, attached and made a part of this Agreement. 3. Method of Payment The Contractor shall submit itemized bills for services provided to the City, attention to the Public Works Maintenance Manager, on a monthly basis. Bills submitted shall be paid in the same manner as other claims made to the City. The Contractor shall provide documentation and reports as required by the City in Exhibit A. 4. Withholding f Payment If the Contractor does not comply with the requirements as outlined in Exhibit A, City will withhold payment and no late fee will be assessed by the Contractor. G:\Street Maintenance\Contracts\Leaf Contract DRAFT.docx 1. 5. Materials Disposition Contractor shall assure that all compostable or aggregate materials removed from the City Designated Collection Facility in the City are not landfilled. 6. Term of This Agreement The term of this Agreement shall be from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015, the date of signature by the parties notwithstanding. This Agreement will automatically renew for additional one year periods unless one party gives notice to the other at least 90 days prior to the end of the current term. 7. Termination This Agreement may be terminated by either party upon ninety (90) days advance written notice to the other party. 8. Subcontractor The Contractor shall not enter into subcontracts for any of the services provided for in this Agreement without the express written consent of the City. Pursuant to Minnesota Statute 471.425, Subdivision 4a, the Contractor agrees to pay any subcontractor within ten (10) days of the Contractor's receipt of payment from the City for undisputed services provided by the subcontractor. 9. Independent Contractor At all times and for all purposes hereunder,the Contractor is an independent contractor and not an employee of the City. No statement herein shall be construed so as to find the Contractor an employee of the City. 10.Assignment Neither party shall assign this Agreement, nor any interest arising herein, without the prior written consent of the other party. 11. Services Not Specified No claim for services furnished by the Contractor not specifically provided for herein shall be honored by the City, unless agreed to in writing and signed by both parties. GAStreet Maintenance\Contracts\Leaf Contract DRAFT.docx 12. Reserved 13. Entire Agreement The entire agreement of the parties is contained in the Contract Documents. This Agreement supersedes all oral agreements and negotiations between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof as well as any previous agreements presently in effect between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof. Any alterations, amendments, deletions, or waivers of the provisions of this Agreement shall be valid only when expressed in writing and duly signed by the parties, unless otherwise provided herein. 14. Compliance with Laws and Regulations In providing services hereunder, the Contractor shall abide by all applicable statutes, ordinances, rules, and regulations pertaining to the provision of services to be provided hereunder. Any violation shall constitute a material breach of this Agreement. 15. Equal Opportunity During the performance of this contract, the Contractor, in compliance with Executive Order 11246, as amended by Executive Order 11375 and Department of Labor regulations 41 CFR Part 60, shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. The Contractor shall take affirmative action to ensure that applicants for employment are qualified, and that employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. 16.Waiver Any waiver by either party of a breach of any provisions of the executed Agreement shall not affect, in any respect, the validity ofthe remainder ofthe executed Agreement. 17. Indemnification The Contractor shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its employees and agents, for all claims, damages, losses, and expenses, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorney's fees, which they may suffer or for which they may be held liable, to the extent of the fault of the negligence of the Contractor, its employees, or subcontractors in the performance of this Agreement. The Contractor shall also pay any expenses, including reasonable attorney's fees, incurred by the City in enforcing this indemnification requirement. 18. Insurance No less than fourteen (14) days before the term of this Agreement commences, and each year thereafter, the Contractor shall provide a certificate of insurance as proof of liability coverage for bodily injury or death in the amount of One Million Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($1,500,000)for any one person and in the sum of Three Million Dollars ($3,000,000)for two or more persons for the same occurrence and for damages to property in the sum of Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000). The certificate of insurance shall name the City as an additional insured and state that the Contractor's coverage shall be the primary and non-contributory coverage in GAStreet Maintenance\Contracts\Leaf Contract DRAFT.docx the event of a loss. Further, the certificate shall provide for written notice to the City, in accordance with the terms of the insurance policy before cancellation, expiration, or change of coverage; and Automobile Insurance A single limit or combined limit or excess umbrella automobile liability insurance policy covering agency owned, non-owned, and hired vehicles used regularly in the provision of services under this Agreement in an amount of not less than One Million Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($1,500,000) per accident for property damage; not less than One Million Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($1,500,000)for death or bodily injury, and/or damage to any one person; and not less thn One Million Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($1,500,000) for total bodily injuries and/or damages arising from any one accident. 19.Timely Communications of Problems The Contractor and the City shall make every reasonable effort to use timely and direct communications unications (e.g., phone, email and/or meetings) to address operational problems and service issues to prevent occurrences resulting in liquidated damages. It is the intention of the parties to work with each other to resolve issues. The contact person for the City shall be the City Representative, and the contact person for the Contractor shall be:Al Friedges, Manager, Organics Recycling Facility. 20.Workers' Compensation Insurance The Contractor shall provide workers compensation insurance covering all employees of the Contractor engaged in the performance of the contract, in accordance with the Minnesota Workers' Compensation Law. Contractor shall provide proof of such insurance to the City at least fourteen (14) days before the term of the Agreement. 21.Conflict of Interest Contractor agrees that no elected official, officer, employee or other representative of the City shall have any interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement or the proceeds thereof. Violation of this provision shall cause this Agreement to be null and void and Contractor will forfeit any payments made under this Agreement. 22. Data Practices/Records All data created, collected, received, maintained or disseminated for any purpose in the course of this Agreement by the City is governed by the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minn. Stat. Ch. 13, any other applicable state statute, or any state rules adopted to implement the act, as well as federal regulations on data privacy. 23. Governing Law This Agreement shall be controlled by the laws of the State of Minnesota. However, nothing in this Agreement is nor shall be construed as a waiver of Contractor's sovereign immunity from suit and Contractor expressly retains its sovereign immunity from suit. GAStreet Maintenance\Contracts\Leaf Contract DRAFT.docx 4 24. Severability If any provision,term or condition of this Agreement is found to be or become unenforceable or invalid, it shall not affect the remaining provisions, terms and conditions of this Agreement, unless such invalid or unenforceable provision, term or condition renders this Agreement impossible to perform. Such remaining trms and conditions ofth Agreement shll continue in full force and effect and shall continue to operate as the parties' entire contract. 25.Amendments The provisions of this Agreement shall remain in force and effect without change. Amendments may be mutually negotiated by both parties but shall not go into effect until reduced to writing and executed by the authorized representatives of the City and the Contractor. 26. Signatures Executed as of the day and year first written above. CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY CONTRACTOR By: - By:ZiLrei4 c);(- Thomas D. Burt, City Manager Charlie Vig, Tribalthairman G:\Street Maintenance\Contracts\Leaf Contract DRAFT.docx 5 EXHIBIT A: BRUSH, SOIL, AND YARD D WASTE COLLECTION AND REMOVAL SERVICES 1. Introduction These specifications define the COMPREHENSIVE BRUSH, SOIL, AND YARD WASTE REMOVAL SERVICES (the "Services")the Contractor will provide for the City of Golden Valley. 2. Definitions Agreement: The agreement for Comprehensive Brush, Soil, and Yard Waste Removal Services between the Contractor and the City consisting of all of the Contract Documents. Brush Waste: Means prunings, shrubs, stump, and tree waste (any diameter). City Designated Collection Facility: All Brush, Soil, and Yard Waste will be brought by the City to the City-owned property at 9305 10"Avenue North for storage prior to removal. Collection Day: Means the day or days of the week on which Removal Operations will take place. Collection Hours:The time period during which Removal Operations is authorized in the City. City Representative:The Public Works Maintenance Manager, or his/her designee, who will be the primary person for communication between the City and Contractor. Contractor: Person or persons authorized by the City to perform Brush, Soil, and Yard Waste Removal Operations at the City Designated Collection Facility. Debris Storage Areas: Designated areas within the City Designated Collection Facility where the Brush, Soil, and Yard Waste will be separated and stored prior to Removal Operations. Equipment:Any Contractor vehicle licensed and inspected by the Minnesota Department of Transportation or other Contractor equipment involved in Removal Operations. Holidays:Shall include New Year's Day, Martin Luther King Day, Presidents Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Veterans Day,Thanksgiving, Day after Thanksgiving, Christmas Eve Day, and Christmas Day. Mobilization:The processes of mobilizing and moving Contractor Equipment from the facilities of the Contractor to City designated facilities for performance of the Services, and the return of such Equipment to Contractor facilities, inclusive of all associated work, time and costs. Organics Recycling Facility: Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community's Organics Recycling Facility located at 1905 Canterbury Road, Shakopee, Minnesota 55379. The facility will conform to all applicable rules, regulations and laws of state, local or other jurisdictions. Removal Operations: Work including the chipping of Brush Waste, screening of Soil Waste, loading of Brush, Soil, or Yard Waste into trucks, trucking of material out of the City Designated Collection Facility, or any other activity directly related to the removal of Brush, Soil, or Yard Waste from the City Designated Collection Facility. Soil Waste: Any material that can be classified under the Unified Soil Classification System (U or American Association of State Highway Transportation Officials AASHTO Soil Classification System. G:\Street Maintenance\Contracts\Leaf Contract DRAFT.docx State:Authorized Agents of the State of Minnesota. Unacceptable Materials:Any items that are not Brush, Soil, or Yard Waste as defined herein. Yard Waste: Means garden wastes, leaves, lawn cuttings, or weeds. 3. Material Preparation The City will collect and sort the Brush, Soil, and Yard Waste into Debris Storage Areas at the City Designated Collection Facility. 4. Ownership of Materials All materials shall remain the responsibility of the City until handled by the Contractor at which point it becomes the responsibility and ownership of the Contractor. Title to and liability for Unacceptable Materials shall at no time pass to the Contractorand shall remain with the City. S. Frequency of Removal Operations The City Representative and Contractor will mutually agree on a schedule for Removal Operations based on the amount of material at the City Designated Collection Facility. B. Removal l operations Hours The Contractor may conduct Removal Operations between the hours of 7 am and Monday through Friday. City crews may assist with loading of the trucks during normal City work hours (7 am to 3 pm). Removal Operations may not occur on Saturdays, Sundays, or Holidays, without prior approval from the City Representative. 7. Compliance with Driving and Hauling Laws Collection and transportation of all Brush, Soil, and Yard Waste shall be accomplished in accordance with all existing laws and ordinances, and future amendments thereto, of the State of Minnesota and local governing bodies. 8. Weighing f Loads The Contractor will keep accurate records consisting of an approved weight slip with the date, time, vehicle number, and net weight for each loaded vehicle. The scale to be used by the Contractor will be permanent and duly certified. 9. Procedure for Unacceptable Materials If the Contractor determines that materials are unacceptable,the Contractor shall notify the City Representative in writing or by phone within two business days of the determination. 10. Clean-up Responsibility Contractor shall make reasonable efforts to keep the City Designated Collection Facility free of Brush, Soil, and Yard Waste in areas outside of the Debris Storage Areas. Contractor shall have no responsibility to remove or clean up any items which are Unacceptable Materials. 11. Vehicle Licensing and Inspection Requirements G:\Street Maintenance\ ontracts\Leaf Contract DRAFT.docx 7 All collection vehicles used in performance of the Agreement shall be duly licensed and inspected by the State of Minnesota and shall operate within the weight allowed by Minnesota statutes. Vehicles shall be used that are in proper working condition and that prevent loss in transit of cargo. The Contractor shall obtain all pertinent licenses and registrations from the City, County and State and have DOT record books. 12. Personnel Requirements The Contractor shall retain sufficient personnel and equipment to fulfill the requirements and specifications of this Agreement. The Contractor's personnel shall: A. Not perform their duties or operate vehicles while consuming alcohol or illegally using controlled substances or while under the influence of alcohol and/or such substances. B. Abide by all applicable local, state and federal laws while performing the work. 13. Contractor Equipment Storage Contractor may store equipment at the City Designated Collection Facility when not in use during the duration of the Removal Operations process. The equipment must be stored or parked in a location so as not to interfere with other City operations at the site. 14. Emergency Service The Contractor will work with the City to provide emergency Brush, Soil, or Yard Waste Removal Service from the City Designated Collection Facility in the event that a man-made or natural disaster creates Brush, Soil, or Yard Waste debris in excess of normal City operations. The scope of the Contractor's work will remain the same as under thcurrent Agreement. Payment for such services will be at the same rate as the Agreement. Should it be necessary for the City to designate an alternative or multiple City Designated Collection Facilities,the Contractor will work with the City to make reasonable accommodations. Payment for the services defined in this Agreement will be a Market industry rates with additional cost to the City. G:\Street Maintenance\Contracts\leaf Contract DRAFT.docx EXHIBIT B: COMPENSATION The City shall pay Contractor as follows for Services provided in accordance with the terms hereof: 1. Brush Waste Removal Price NO COST.All Removal Operations associated with the Brush Waste including disposal at the Organics Recycling Facility will be at no cost to the City. 2. Soil Waste Removal Price The Soil Waste removal price shall be as follows: A. $500 per Equipment Mobilization. B. $350 per hour maximum rate for Equipment (screener) use. The City will provide a loader and operatorto load the Soil Waste into the hauling Equipment at the City's expense. Contractor shall provide City Representative with no less than 2 business days' advance notice of need for loader and operator. C. $450 per hour maximum rate for Equipment (screener) use. The Contractor will provide a loader and operator to load the Soil Waste into the hauling Equipment included as part of this hourly rate for the Equipment. D. $135.00 per hour maximum rate for Contractor costs for hauling the screened material from the City Designated Facility to the Organics Recycling Facility. E. The tipping fee to accept the Soil Waste at the Organics Recycling Facility will be negotiated before screening of the material commences. 3. Yard Waste Removal Price The Yard Waste removal price shall be as follows: A. $3.50 per cubic yard when material is brought to the Organics Recycling Facility by the City. B. $4.50 per cubic yard when the Contractor hauls the material from the City Designated Collection Facility to the Organics Recycling Facility. The City will provide a loader and operator to load the Yard Waste into the hauling Equipment at the City's expense. Contractor shall provide City Representative with no less than 2 business days' advance notice of need for loader and operator. C. $5.25 per cubic yard when the Contractor loads and hauls the material from the City Designated Collection Facility to the Organics Recycling Facility. The Contractor will provide a loader and operator to load the Yard Waste into the hauling equipment. G:\Street Maintenance\Contracts\Leaf Contract DRAFT.docx Resolution 15-07 January 20, 2015 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CONTRACT WITH THE SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY FOR REMOVAL SERVICES FOR BRUSH, SOIL, AND YARD WASTE WHEREAS, the City routinely produces significant quantities of brush, soil, and yard waste through maintenance activities and projects; and WHEREAS, The Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community have an organic recycling facility; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council for the City of Golden Valley to authorize the Contract with Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community for Removal Services for Brush, Soil, and Yard Waste. Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by the City Clerk. u,� NNIN rye( V 0 mphiii Q(0/0, ,Ill )t,()'1 I� Ill,. 111 w ' u IWW4 :1"f":"1,1 ) Ii14 !1\ u E p Ill00 Me ig000 II 0 AI 1 M,� 0 Moil iI hhiiiiuiii 011110° 1 WEE II' .m uuuRu'uu..uouWuuV°uuulll1l'!W0 yV Il mW 0 Park a I r '0e crt Vv .0 pao " o�II ., rt t men° 763-512-2345µ 763-512-2344 pax mummuuuuunmmmuuuuunmnmmnuuEnnmmmunuEnnmnmmnuunmnmmnuunmnmmnuunmnmmnuunmnmmnuunmnmmnuunmnmmnuunmnmmnuunmnmmnuunmnmmnuunmnmmnuunmuuuuunm Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting January 20, 2015 Agenda Item 3. H. Brookview Community Center Task Force Final Report Prepared By Rick Birno, Director of Parks and Recreation Summary The final report for the conceptual design of the proposed Community Center prepared by consultant staff finalizing the work of the Council appointed Community Center Task Force. Attachments • Brookview Community Center Feasibility Study (15 pages) Recommended Action Motion to file and received the Brookview Community Center Feasibility Study Summary Report. Brookview Community Center Feasibility Study Summary Report 12/31/14 HGA COMMISSION NUMBER 2065-004-00 Coil'0.J — Va ley 1. Executive Summary The City of Golden Valley desired HGA Architects to work with the City-appointed Task Force in site evaluation and planning for a new community center facility to be located in Golden Valley, Minnesota. The Task Force considered three sites and five options and foregrounded two options for further study. Ultimately, the Task Force recommended a preferred design option on the existing Brookview Community Center and Golf Course site. The information in this summary is a resource to help the Golden Valley City Council and staff guide the future direction for the replacement of Brookview Community Center. The team began by defining a building program that reflects the needs and desires of the community. Once the desired spaces were identified, site designs were tested. Lastly, the Task Force identified a preferred site configuration and HGA prepared a design option and cost estimate to reflect the Task Force vision. Our findings are documented in this report. 1.1 Project Stakeholders and Design Team The Feasibility Study process was informed and guided by a Task Force appointed by the City of Golden Valley. The Task Force was comprised of a diverse group of stakeholders representing multiple constituents from across the city. Each individual involved graciously provided time and expertise to ensure the completion of a comprehensive Feasibility Study and recommendation for a community center that best meets the needs of the city. The design team received guidance and direction from the City of Golden Valley Director of Parks and Recreation, Parks and Recreation staff, and Brookview Golf staff. The team included design professionals from HGA Architects (engineers and planners responsible for building programming, site analysis, site fit planning, and construction cost estimating); professionals from Gill Design, Inc, who provided analysis and planning of golf programs; and professionals from Ballard * King & Associates LTC, who provided demographic summary, market review, and operation plan analysis. Stakeholders and members of the design team include: City of Golden Valley Staff Carrie Anderson Recreation Supervisor Rick Birno Director of Parks & Recreation Ben Disch Golf Operations Manager Brian Erickson Recreation Supervisor Jeanne Fackler Recreation Supervisor Chantell Knauss Assistant City Manager Jeff Oliver City Engineer Greg Spencer Golf Course Superintendent Cheryl Weiler Communications Manager Jason Zimmerman Planning Management ItCommission No.:2065-004- 12/31/14 1 Community Center Task Force Brittany Blazar Teen Committee Representative John Cornelius Open Space and Recreation Commission Pat Dale Golden Valley Little League Lynn Gitelis Environmental Commission Brad Kadue Brookview Men's Golf Association John Kluchka Planning Commission Kelly Kuebelbeck Open Space and Recreation Commission Dean Penk Environmental Commission Karla Rose Golden Valley Girls Softball Merton Suckerman Seniors Community Mickie Weaver Brookview Women's Golf Association Design/Consultant Team Nancy Blankfard, AIA HGA - Project Manager Garret Gill Gill Design, Inc - Golf Consultant Kari Haug Gill Design, Inc - Golf Consultant Jessica Horstkotte HGA - Design Intern Jeff King Ballard*King- Operations Consultant Victor Pechaty, AIA HGA - Design Principal Joe Tarlizzo HGA - Cost Estimating Glenn Waguespack, AIA HGA - Project Architect 2. Establishing Need 2.1 Project Visioning Identifying a clear project vision was a necessary first step in refining program needs for the Brookview Community Center. From this vision the Task Force formed guiding principles to ensure that all future explorations of building space programs and design options grew out of Golden Valley's unique character and goals for the future. These principles acknowledge that Brookview Community Center will be a success if: • it facilitates greater community engagement o it is fun and welcoming o it is accessible/easy to get in and out of o it has enough parking o it supports a variety of functions—from birthday parties to corporate events to club meetings to community programs o it meets needs and supports programs that attracts citizens of all ages o it serves as a destination, a central hub o it functions as a gathering place o it is a place where parents are comfortable dropping off their kids o it is the first place you'd want to go if you're bored! o it functions as a storm shelter o it is an enjoyable place to be ItCommission No.:2065-004- 12/31/14 2 • it is a source of community pride o it brings greater brand awareness of Golden Valley o it is a "legacy" building o it is architecturally significant o it becomes a historic 100-year landmark o it is compatible with the mid-century modern character in Golden Valley o it gets 20,000 likes on Facebook o it makes other cities jealous o it has a beam that looks like a tree, a nod to the existing building o it is a place to locate a community time capsule • residents feel it is a good investment o it operates efficiently o it is revenue-generating o it doesn't drain other programs o it maximizes view/daylight and is energy efficient These principles establish the standards against which all quantitative programming and design studies would be evaluated throughout the Feasibility Study process. They are reflected in the design options allowing the City to take the next steps toward a full realization of Brookview Community Center. 3. Facility Programs The City-appointed Task Force guided decisions regarding the programmatic needs for a new Golden Valley Community Center. 3.1 Proposed Program Golf Program The proposed golf program would replace and improve upon the existing golf program at Brookview Golf Course. Golf Operations The proposed spaces for golf operations include administrative offices and storage. The designated space would allow the golf administrative team to continue to operate at its current capacity. Pro Shop The pro shop capacity is consistent with the current space in the existing Brookview club house. Locker Rooms New golf locker rooms reflect a slight increase in space, allowing for the ability to store golf bags in lockers, thus eliminating the need for a bag room. ItCommission No.:2065-004- 12/31/14 fpf,li�l f�' f a v Cart Storage Currently, golf carts are stored remotely at Brookview and require significant staff resources and time to stage the carts at the club house at the beginning and end of each day. Providing on-site storage would eliminate the need for additional labor, making golf operations much more efficient. Included in the cart storage space is enough capacity for 80 carts, infrastructure for gas and electric vehicles, as well as a cart washing station. Grill/Bistro The Brookview golf course currently operates a grill with a seating capacity for 77 people. With the recent acquisition of a liquor license, the grill currently serves beer and alcohol in addition to a limited menu. The Task Force would like to see this amenity expanded and enhanced to attract a broader customer base, drawing both from the increased traffic at the new community center as well as the broader community. The new grill/bistro space includes a larger kitchen and increased storage as well as a servery and seating area to accommodate up to 125 patrons. Parks and Recreation The City of Golden Valley's Parks and Recreation Department will continue to operate out of the community center. Parks and Recreation Operations A designated space, including administrative offices and storage, would allow the Parks and Recreation administrative team to continue to operate at its current capacity. Kids Play An indoor kids play area would continue to encourage multi-generational use of the community center as well as draw in revenue for the facility. The kids play facility would include an indoor play structure, an open play area with sports flooring, two birthday party rooms, and a parent waiting area. Building Support In addition to the necessary restrooms, janitors closets, shipping/receiving, trash/recycling, mechanical, and electrical spaces, the Task Force expressed a desire for wide hallways to allow for art gallery space, an organics disposal space, ample coat closets, and a lobby that allows for gathering. Lobby Particular importance was placed on making the lobby an open and welcoming space for the building. The Task Force wanted it to be a place of gathering as well as a place of entry, with amenities such as WiFi and charging stations, a fireplace, vending, and a reception desk to welcome guests. Commission No.:2065-004- gol en � � a1._ , Community Gathering { A key priority identified by the Task Force was to develop a community center that functions as a central hub for community gathering. This is reflected in the variety of program spaces that encourage residents of all ages to use the building. Banquet Facilities The Task Force expressed a strong desire for increasing the building's capacity to host large events such as weddings and conferences. The proposed banquet facility more than doubles the existing banquet space, with the capacity to seat 350 people at tables. This space could be subdivided when not being used at its maximum capacity. Support spaces for this facility include beverage stations, a catering kitchen, r equipment storage, and a pair of green rooms. , Multiuse Performance All The multiuse performance space is large enough to hold a 50- person orchestra and seat 100 people in the audience. However, this flexible space could also be used for dance and W_W •• lf drama performances in addition to music. Also, the room could be configured to host lectures or other presentations. The technical requirements of the room would allow for performance lighting and audio. Supporting spaces include an AV control room and general storage space as well as storage lawn bowling for instrument, drama, and dance programs. rr Multipurpose Classrooms t Three classrooms of varying sizes include two adjacent classrooms (1,000 square feet and 1,500 square feet) with appropriate flooring and storage spaces to support healthy living garden activities such as yoga and pilates. The third classroom would be equipped for art, with easy to clean surfaces as well as necessary plumbing and drainage. Seniors Gathering An expanded seniors space provides Golden Valley seniors with welcoming place to spend time throughout the week. CA ••• ' This dedicated area includes a meeting room large enough for 50-60 seniors to be seated at four-top tables; a gathering area with a fireplace, comfortable seating, and residential kitchen; separate classroom space; and adequate storage. Tenant Offices Tenant offices would be available for community organizations to rent at affordable rates. Commission No.:2065-004- 12/31/14 07110J cit ien va e Site Amenities The Task Force identified a number of site related programs and a improvements to ensure the golf course is operated at a comparable level to a new facility as well as to capitalize on the unique location of ► . a new community center. Lawn Bowling Due to the immediate success of the new lawn bowling rink at the gr ill/bistro current community center site, adding a second rink was identified as a priority. Rotating between the rinks would allow one to regrow while the other is in use. Additionally, it would allow for increased capacity for tournaments on a limited basis. Outdoor Event Space An outdoor event space adjacent to the banquet facilities would provide a protected area for weddings, parties, or other gatherings. With the backdrop of the golf course, this space capitalizes on the unique pairing of community center and golf clubhouse. Golf Cart Staging . A paved area near the first tee is necessary to stage golf carts at •• the beginning and end of each day, as well as for large golf events. Garden Space A designated garden space would create an ideal backdrop for wedding photography as well as provide the opportunity for wY�•.. . , community members to tend the garden. ra Patio Dining Patio dining would serve as an outdoor extension to the grill/bistro and provide diners with views and access to the golf course and lawn bowling as well as food service to these outdoor programs. performance Mini Golf Mini golf would be an addition to the existing golf program to - , " -" attract patrons of all ages. Putting Green To better serve golf patrons, the size of the existing putting green should be increased. Driving Range Improvements To increase the appeal of Brookview Golf Course, improvements should be made to the existing driving range to allow for a full range of clubs to be used. • L.�7 Commission No.:2065-004- 12/31/14 6 Circ.of 3.2 Program Summary Building Amenities Net Square lFe�et Golf Operations 2,070 Pro Shop 1,300 Locker Rooms 1,900 Cart Storage 7,700 Grill/Bistro 3,900 Banquet Facilities 6,710 Multiuse Performance 3,220 Multipurpose Classrooms 3,960 Seniors Gathering 3,400 Tenant Offices 1,280 Parks and Rec Operations 3,620 Kids Play 4,730 Lobby 2,050 Building Support 6,648 Subtotal (net square feet) 52,488 Non-assign able (net to gross 28,263 multiplier 1.54) otal Area (gross square feet) 80,751 Site Amenities • Existing Golf Course • Lawn Bowling Expansion • Outdoor Event Space • Golf Cart Staging • Garden Spaces • Patio Dining • Putting Green • Driving Range Improvements IiCommission No.:2065-004- 12/31/14 7 city Iv Va 4. Preferred Option Following the presentation of the five building options, two were identified as potential for further study—Option 2 and Option 3. The Task Force went through a prioritization exercise to distill the project scope to something in between these two options. Materials from this exercise, including a cost breakdown by program element, can be found in the addenda. The preferred option reflects the same programmatic elements as Option 3 as recommended by the Task Force. The following building development, cost, and operations estimates detail the preferred option. 4.1 Concept Design Site Plan Pond Future Expansion Existing Golf Maintenance Building Images 4.1 reflect the development of the site immediately surrounding the proposed New building. Notable elements include: Mini Golf New Pond . two lawn bowling rinks to the Course Parking Lot south of the building • ample garden space surrounding the building • reconfiguring the starting and Pond finishing holes of the golf course • covered drop-off at building entry • new surface parking lot to north New Putting of building ...,�„�,, Green • new mini golf course Pond • new and expanded putting green • expanded golf cart staging area Hole 1Tee • Brookview Parkway S re- established as a road separate from parking 9th Green Lawn Bowling Courts 18th Green Hole 10Tee N Driving Range SITE PLAN It Commission No.:2065-004- 12/31/14 8 4. T+'-I. 4.1 Concept Design Site Plan (continued) Service Garde Main Entry Access Garden New Putting Green ... -, New Covered Two-Story DroD Buildinq Roof a Golf Terrace Terrace Rclnw. - Golf Cart Staciina Lawn Bowlin+" a� Lawn Bowling, mp N ENLARGED SITE PLAN �fk Commission No.:2065-004- 12/31/14 10 cn'y of� 4.2 Concept Design Building Plan The lowest level of the proposed building plan is primarily underground, taking advantage of the significant grade change at this site. Service access would be located on this level, with access from the adjacent parking lot to the north. Service Access r, Van parks& ' Storag Rec Storage Golf Storage Area Below Cart Storage T U t LOWER LEVEL Commission No.:2065-004- 12/31/14 gG) t. L'1r'g? jev� 4.2 Concept Design Building Plan (continued) The main level is focused on community center and golf programs. Key adjacencies include kids play,main lobby,and Parks & Recreation offices;seniors gathering space and gathering lobby; grill/bistro,patio dining,and lawn bowling;pro shop and the first hole tee. Garden SDaces Secondary Entry V uv ----- Sday Party t Tenant Office t Rooms Mair Entry Garben w/Trellis r t t Kds Play l r Y Gathering Main; (Seniors) Ent4---------- --------------- 8tttrm i Covered t I t + Lobby/Reception t LobbylGathering + Drop � ---------- + Pro � ---------------� Pro i Shop n Parks&ROc ShoD r Adman i i Equipmgnt GolfAdmin /idmin Golf ; Offices , Terrace ) `' - Garden Cl SDaces Classroom 1 Bistro itchen n torage HL Classroom 2 x. . , ' Seminar L-_--_-____.--_------ Dining Patio Secondary Entry r; rGardeLawn Bowling e MAIN LEVEL Commission No.:2065-004- 12/31/14 Va.. _ 4.2 Concept Design Building Plan (continued) The upper level consists of the primary event spaces.Taking advantage of surrounding landscape,the outdoor event space has been incorporated onto a roof terrace above the main level. n ° rn m I H D v a = o m a Mechanf l o Multi use Performance s� r B[1rm 1 1 1 0 I Q L bby ferrac `,� 1 - + m r + r 1 1 Events Banquet Terrace w/ Trellis ; --------------- n + r + I I 1 r 1 Ro s 1 1 I Kitchen to + + o' m L--- m •Exterior Stair N UPPER LEVEL Commission No.:2065-004- 12/31/14 -- -- citye gold valley 4.3 Cost Estimate Below is a summary of the cost estimate for the preferred building option. Building Vision Estimate $33,557,555 • Demolition of existing building • New 80,751-square-foot building ($320/sf) • Project soft costs (30%construction cost) Site Vision Estimate $4,823,819 • Parking/site work • Golf improvements • Outdoor program amenities • Project soft costs (15%construction cost) Total Investment $38,381,374 Clarification Notes Specific LEED strategies evaluated during next design phase. Alternative funding methods for sustainability initiatives may be available. LEED Silver(standard industry building practice) included LEED Gold 5%+/- LEED Platinum 15%+/- Escalation in construction costs based on start date • If construction starts in Q1 2016 included • If construction starts in Q1 2017 4%+/- 0 If construction starts in Q1 2018 8%+/- f,i,7 Commission No.:2065-004- 12/31/14 14 4.4 Operations Analysis Summary for the preferred building option Expenditure— Revenue Comparison Cate o Facility Budget Expen itures 5825,367 Revenue $494,640- Difference 494,640Di erence 330,727 Recovery percentage 60% *Golf Revenue is not factored into operational model. Demand estimates are conservative and do not acknowledge premium for view/location,etc. Five-Year Revenue Expense Comparison Years Recover 2016 60% 2017 61% 2018 62% 2019 63% 2020 63% Maximizing Revenue-Generating Programs • Grill/bistro • Lawn bowling expansion • Banquet facility sized to market demand • Play area with party rooms • Tenant office space • Miniature golf course • Views to the golf course and new design will increase demand • Appeal to people of all ages • Capturing lost opportunities for revenue i� '' Bui+ kluv: Commission No.:2065-004- 12/31/14 15 ww, a uuu uVf J�jJ J 1))111 ui W wu..0000. oOolisi,. ' �u µ III I Ny � � ! � ... 0 wI000000 KrwKwc. irwrt err u�w�ll Police rtDepiar"n `�v I IY- .�Ih Pid uuu�� u�m .,ice mluIIIIW �� A 763-593-8079 763-593-8098 (fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting January 20, 2015 Agenda Item 3. I. Authorization to Sign Funding Agreement with the City of Minneapolis for the Toward Zero Deaths (TZD) Grant Program Prepared By Stacy Carlson, Chief of Police Summary The Police Department partners with the City of Minneapolis in a Toward Zero Death (TZD) grant, with the City of Minneapolis as the fiscal agent. Through the duration of the contract, which ends on September 30, 2015, Golden Valley will be reimbursed up to a maximum of$29,962.00 for conducting enforcement shifts focusing on impaired driving, seatbelts, speeding, Move Over violations and distracted driving. Grant funds will also pay$200 toward personnel attendance at the state TZD conference. Attachments • Funding Agreement with Minneapolis for the Toward Zero Deaths Grant Program (16 pages) Recommended Action Motion to authorize the Mayor and City Manager to sign the Funding Agreement with the City of Minneapolis for the Toward Zero Deaths (TZD) Grant Program. FUNDING AGREEMENT BET EN CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS LIS THE CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY FOR THE SUBG • + NT FROM STATE OF MINNESOTA DEP `T I NT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, TOWARD ZERO DEATHS ENFORCE NT G ' NT PROG ' i M THIS CONT' x CT, entered into as of this 11 t day of October, 2014, by and between the CITY OF 1' I EAP LIS, a Mi esota municipal corporation(herein called the "City"), and the CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY, a M'I esota a'cipal corporation(herein called the "Grantee"). EREAS,in cooperation with . tee,the City has made application(the"Application")to the State of MeMinnesota, Dep. ent of Public Safety, Office of Traffic Safety (the "Grantor") and has received funds in the . ount of$372,388 from the Grantor's Zero Deaths Enforcement t Progr. ("Enforcement Grant") and entered into an agreement with the tor(the"Enforcement Gr Contract"); and REAS,the City in its Enforcement Grant application agreed to serve as fiscal agent and to award some of the proceeds ofthe Enforcement Grant in an * o t not to exceed $29,962 (the "Subgrant")to Grantee,to pay or reimburse Cr. tee costs associated with the payment of overtime to traffic enforcement officers as part of the increased enforcement progr. targeting i p.* -d driver, .ttentive drivers and yo g adult and juvenile violators of speed li Is and other traffic laws. NOW, THEREFORE,it is agreed between the parties hereto that: 1 Aw D. The City hereby awards the Subgrant to Grantee for the payment of overt* a to Gr. a tee's Police Officers who engage in enforcement of speed l' its, other traffic violations, impaired, and inattentive driving •der the te s of the Enforcement Grant. Exhibit A consists of Application Exhibit A-1 and the Enforcement Grant Contract between the City and the tor attached hereto as Exhibit A-2.,the contents of which is incorporated herein(the "Progr. "). The Subgrant must be used exclusively to pay or reimburse only expenses authorized under the Enforcement Grant Contract. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary,the Grantee derstands and agrees that any reduction or te • is tion of the State Enforcement Grant Contract may result in a like reduction or to ination of the Subgrant Contract, and that any material change in the timeline, scope of the Progr. or description of the services in the Enforcement Grant Contract will result in material changes to the Subgrant Contract. 2. PERFO O A MONITORING. The Grantee must comply with all requirements in the Enforcement Grant Contract and submit any reporting info ation on the Progr. that may be requested by the Grantor. A default by the Grantee der the Enforcement Grant Contract will constitute noncompliancewith this Subgrant Contract. PM#12-28721 If the City or Grantor finds that there has been a failure to comply with the provisions of this Subgrant Contract or that reasonable progress has not been *4e to : • pee ance under the Progr: ,notwithstanding any other provisions of this Sub .nt Contract to the contrary and after written notice and re; u,able opportunity to cure,the City *y refuse to dish e additional funds and/or require the return of all or part of the Subgrant funds already disbursed, to the extent such funds were used for purposes other ; activities contemplated by this Subgrant Contract. If action to co - t such substandard perfo ance is not taken by the Grantee within sixty calendar days(or such longer period specified by the City)after being notified inwriting by the City,the City may terminate this Subgrant Contract. Notwithstanding anything Subgrant in this Sub rant Contract to the contrary,if for any reasons other than those caused solely by the City's negligence in managing the Enforcement Grant the ntor requires the City to repay any or all of the Subgrant,Grantee unconditionally g antees that it will repay whatever funds that have been paid to Grantee that - required to be ret ed to the Grantor within thirty(30) days of written notification of the Grantor's requir.-_ 'ent.The Grantee agrees topayanyand all expenses inc .d by the City to enforce this provision to the extent such p expenses ; - caused by the Grantee. This provision shall survive expiration or termination of this Sub t Contract. 3. TIIVIE OF PERFO ANCE. Grantee shall undertake the Progr• on or before the date of this Contract and complete the Prog by September 30,2015(the"End Date")or such other date as may be agreed to by the City and the Grantee. The City is not obl.�:=ted to pay for any llati cin Program costs int ed : -r September 30,2015 or any earlier t- ination or cancellation, occurs first. This Contract maybe cancelled by the City upon sixty(60)days' wli�chc� er notice to Grantee without cause. In the event of such cellation, 0 : tee shall be entitled to nt det= fined on a pro rata basis,for work or services satisfactorily performed up to the payCancellationCity'sor G � .:..torauthority date of such cancellation. does not alter the to recover Subgrant funds on the basis of a later audit or other review,and does not alter Grantee's obligation to return any Subgrant funds due to the City or Grantor as a result of later audits or corrections. 4. DISBURSEMENT. It is expressly agreed and understood that the total,esti .ted,amount to be paid bythe Cityunder this Contract will not exceed$29,962, The Grantee shall allocate and in enforcement;(b) spend the Enforcement Grantas follows: (a) $19,077 for impaired driving $6,186for seatbelt enforcement;(c)$2,978 for speed limit and Move Over violations;(d) $1,521 for distracted driving enforcement;and(e)$200 to attend the state TZD conference. The exact amount earned by the Grantee and payable by the City will be dete ined based upon the actual number of hours spent by the Grantee working on the Progr: The maim amountp a able is the amount indicated in this Section 4. The City will make disbursements no more often than monthly and only upon receipt of a itten dish -meat request from Grantee acceptable to the City. AnyGrantee's expenditures in excess of the amount indicated in this Section 4 shall be the sole obligation of the Grantee. 5. NOTICES.S. Communication and details concerning this Contract shall be directed to the following Contract representatives: PM#12-28121 2 Wendy Guck City of Minneapolis Police Department Room 107, City Hall 350 South Fifth Street Minneapolis, MN 55415 Phone: (612) 673-3415 Grantee: Stacy Carlson City of Golden Valley Police Department 7800 Golden Valley Road Golden Valley, MN 55427 Phone: (763) 593-8079 6. GENERAL CONDITIONS. A. General_Compliance. The Grantee agrees to comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations governing the Program and funds provided under this Contract. B. Independent Grantee. Nothing contained in this Contract is intended to, or shall be construed in any manner, as creating or establishing the relationship of employer/employee between the parties. The Grantee shall at all times remain an independent contractor with respect to the services to be performed under this Contract. The City shall be exempt from payment of all unemployment compensation, FICA, retirement, life and/or medical insurance andworkers' compensation insurance as the Grantee is an independent contractor. C. itonsibility. Subject to applicable law, including the Minnesota Tort Claims Act, each party shall be responsible for the claims, losses, damages and expenses that are proximately caused by the wrongful or negligent acts or omissions of that party or its agents, employees or representatives acting within the scope of their duties. Nothing herein shall be construed to limit either party from asserting against third parties any defenses or immunities including common law, statutory and constitutional) it may # have or be construed to create a basis for a claim or suit when none would otherwise exist. Neither party shall be liable to each other for any indirect, consequential, incidental, lost profit, or expectancy damages. This provision shall survive the termination of this Agreement. This indemnification ation shall not be construed as a waiver on the part of either the City or the Grantee of any immunities or limits on liability provided by Minnesota Statutes Chapter 466 or other applicable State or Federal law. D. vorlersi_Compensation. The Grantee shall provide workers'compensation insurance coverage for its employees involved in the performance of this Contract. PM#12-28721 E. Insurance. The City and Grantee each represent that it is self-insured pursuant to applicable law. 7. ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS. A. Accuntig Standards. The Grantee agrees to maintain the necessary source documentation and enforce sufficient internal controls as dictated by generally accepted accounting practices to properly account for expenses incurred under this Contract. Records. 1. Retention. The Grantee shall retain all records pertinent to expenditures incurred under this Contract until conclusion of the latest of a six years after the Grantee has completed the Program; orb six years after the resolution of all audit findings. Records for nonexpendable property acquired with funds under this Contract shall be retained for six(6)years after final disposition of such property. 2. Inspections. All Grantee records with respect to any matters covered by this Contract shall be made available to the City,the Grantor or their designees at any time during normal business hours, as often as the City or the Grantor deems necessary,to audit, examine, and make excerpts or transcripts of all relevant data. 3. Audits. The Grantee shall have an annual financial compliance audit conducted if required by the Grantor by and in accordance with the City's policy concerning subrecipient audits. In general, this policy applies only to non-profit subrecipients who spend in excess of$50,000 annually from City contracts. The Grantee shall submit two copies of such audit report to the City. An deficiencies noted in such audit reports or audit/monitoring itoring reports issued by the City or its designees must be fully cleared by the Grantee within a reasonable time period after a request has been received from the City. Failure of the Grantee to comply with the provisions of this paragraph will constitute a violation of this Contract and may result in the withholding of future payments or the requirement for Grantee to return all or part of the funds already disbursed. . Data Practices Aft. The Grantee and the City shall comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Chapter 13. 5. Close-Outs. The Grantee's obligation to the City shall not end til all close-out requirements are completed. Activities during this close-out period shall include,but are not limited to: making final payments, disposing of program assets (including the return of all unused materials, equipment, unspent cash advances, program income balances, and receivable accounts to the City), determining the custodianship of records and resolving audit findings. PM#12-28721 4 C. Payments. The City will pay to the Grantee funds available under this Contract based upon information submitted by the Grantee and consistent with any approved budget and City policy concerning payments. In addition, the City reserves the right to liquidate funds available under this Contract for costs incurred by the City on behalf of the Grantee. D. procurement. The Grantee shall comply with applicable State statutes and Grantee's policy concerning the retention of contractors and the purchase ofmaterials, supplies and equipment and shall maintain an inventory record of all nonexpendable personal property as may be procured with funds provided herein. All unexpended program income shall revert to the City upon termination of this Contract. 8. PERSONNEL AND PARTICIPANT CONDITIONS. A. Civil Rights. .. Compliance. The Grantee shall comply with its Regents Policies on discrimination, Title 7, Civil Rights Act of1968 - 42 USC 3601, applicable nondiscrimination provisions contained in Minnesota Statutes Chapter 363A and U.S. Executive Order 11246 as amended by Executive Orders 11375 and 12086. 2. Nondiscrimination. The Grantee will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, creed,religion, ancestry, national origin, sex, sexual orientation, disability or other handicap, age,marital status, or status with regard to public assistance. The Grantee will take affirmative action to insure that all employment practices are free from such discrimination. Such employment practices include but are not limited to the following: hiring, upgrading, demotion,transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff,termination,rates of pay or other forms of compensation, and selection for training, including apprenticeship. 3. Noncompliance. In any event of the Grantee's noncompliance with the nondiscrimination clauses of this Contract or with any of such rules,regulations or provisions herein,this Contract may be cancelled,terminated or suspended, in whole or in part, and the Grantee may be declared ineligible by the Minneapolis City Council from any further participation in City contracts in addition to other remedies as provided by law. 4. Liability. In the event there is probable cause to believe the Grantee is in noncompliance with the nondiscrimination clauses of this Contract or with any applicable rules or regulations,the City may withhold up to fifteen(15)percent of the Subgraut funds until such time as the Grantee is found d to be in compliance or is otherwise adjudicated to be in compliance. B. Affirmative Action. 1. plan. The Grantee shall develop an affirmative action plan in accordance with its city policies and state law, if applicable. The Grantee shall submit the PM#12-28721 necessary affirmative action documentation to the City for approval prior to the disbursement of funds. 2. Access to Records. The Grantee shall furnish all information and reports required hereunder, and to permit access to the Grantee's books,records and accounts for purposes of investigation to ascertain compliance with the rules, regulations and provisions stated herein. 3. Notifications, The Grantee shall send to each labor union or representative of workers with which it has a collective bargaining agreement or other contract or understanding, a notice,to be provided by the agency contracting officer advising the labor union or worker's representative of the Grantee's commitments hereunder, and shall post copies of the notice in conspicuous places available to employees and applicants for employment. 4. EEO/AA Statement. The Grantee shall, in all solicitations or advertisements for p employees laced by or on behalf of the Grantee, state that it is an equal opportunity or affirmative action employer. C. Human Rests Commission ission_Task Force. Grantee and any sub-contractors and suppliers must comply requirements the uirements of Grantee's Human Rights Commission Task Force("HRC Task Force"). Grantee and its sub-contractors and suppliers shall, consistent with the provisions of the HRC Task Force, devote a reasonable percentage of their subcontracting and material purchases to certified women-owned and minority-owned small businesses. D. Conduct. 1. AssigqaWity. The Grantee shall not assign or transfer any interest in this Subgrant Contract(whether by assignment or novation) without the prior written consent of the City; provided,however,that claims for money due or to become due to the Grantee from the City under this Contract may be assigned to a bank, trust company, or other financial institution without such approval. Notice of any such assignment or transfer shall be furnished promptly to the City. 2. Conflict of Interest Code of Ethics The Grantee agrees to be bound by its Administrative Policies on conflicts of interest and code of ethics. 3. Subcontracts. (a) Selection Process. The Grantee shall undertake to ensure that all subcontracts let in the performance of this Subgrant Contract shall be awarded on a fair and open competition basis. Executed copies of all subcontracts along with documentation concerning the selection process shall be forwarded to the City upon request. PM#12-28721 (b) Monitoring.. The City may monitor subcontracted services on a regular basis to assure contract compliance. Results of monitoring efforts shall be summarized in written reports and supported with documented evidence of follow-up actions taken to correct areas of noncompliance. (c) OSHA. Grantee shall require that contractors performing work being paid with the Subgrant funds be in compliance with all applicable state and federal laws and regulations regarding employment and workplace safety including but not limited to OSHA regulations, especially the Federal Hazardous Waste Operations an Emergency Response Standards (29 C.F.R. 1910.120 and 29 C.F.R. 1926.65). 9. MISCELLANEOUS. A. Copyright. If this Subgrant Contract results in any copyrightable material, the Grantee is free to copyright the work, but the City anchor the Grantor reserves the right to royalty-free, nonexclusive and irrevocable license to reproduce, publish or otherwise use, and to authorize others to use,the work for government purposes. B. Rejigioys Organization. The Grantee agrees that funds provided under this Subgrant Contract will not be utilized for religious activities, to promote religious interests, or for the benefit of a religious organization. C. Plain Language Law. To the extent applicable,the Grantee shall comply with provisions of the plain language law requiring written material produced for applicants and recipients to be understandable to a person who reads at the seventh grade level (Minnesota Statutes, Section 268.0124, 1988). D. Governing Law. This Subgrant Contract shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of Minnesota.. E. Counterparts. This Subgrant Contract may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same agreement. F. Billboards. No Subgrant funds may be used by the Grantee to pay for billboard advertising as provided in the Minneapolis Code of Ordinances, Section 544.120. G. $ teJgulatory Requirements. The Grantee shall comply with all reporting and regulatory requirements of the Grantor. (Signature pages follow.) PM#12-28721 Signature page to Funding Agreement IN FURTHERANCE WHEREOF,the patties have executed this Contract as of the date first written above. CITY OF MI EAPOLIS Finance Officer Enterprise Contract Administrator City Purchasing Agent Approved as to form: Assistant City Attorney Department Head Responsible for Administering and Monitoring Contract: Chief or Deputy Chief Police Department PM#12-28721 Signature page to Funding Agreement CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY Fed. L.I . By: .Y,;.:.WN'�/i'Y W;;DYYYYYkJI!'�^..WYYPJJJJ 4^NrYNAIWV'IJMIIVIUUIN�II�IIIG IIIIIIII�WWW%AVIVF<�p/)yJy/��m� w w ^^g 9YY,lYY,JI,y:" „,JIyJC"" w Its: PM#12-28721 EXHIBIT A STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, OFFICE OF TRAFFIC SAFETY GRANT PROGRAM DOCUMENTS 1. Grant Application Enforcement Grant Wave Plan 2. City and State of Minnesota, Department of Public Safety, Office of Traffic Safety Grant Agreement PM#12-28721 I�uouu 'lll Illwlmillll q1 �, uVull�u IIS' �I uG `Itl�rBla;��l, i�II�I'��„�mS' �11��i d��l�y� 1(u �� IIVI enuIII"p; : Yah »°uluoU (;�IS``lf '\\�oY. R6 141 I muu,ii ' Q� 6��`Y d �IIY W o 0�� V llb, M"urv91i6d ppII fi �IIII� � 1� �� un�5 rlu �m u'l„muWIV ppl I�I (��� J. I�o, i•4p' i .VI. �i� � , .. rr r ��y r Grant Agreement Page 1 of Lry Minnesota Deportment of Ptibl c Safety("State”) Grant Program: 2015 Toward Zero Deaths(TSD) Office of Traffic Safety Enforcement Grant 445 Minnesota St Suite 150 project No.: 15-02-06, 15414-04, 15-03-07 St.Paul,Minnesota 55101-5150 Grant Agreement No.: A-ENP 15- 015- MPLSPD-00032 Grantee: Grant Agreement Term: Minneapolis Police Department Effective Date: Octobei 1,2014 350 5 St S Expiration Date: September 30,2015 _Minneapolis,Minnesota 55415-1316 Grantee's Authorized Representative:ive: Grant Agreement Amount: Lieutenant Chris Hudok Original Agreement $372,338.00 350 5 St S Matching Requirement $0.00 Minneapolis,Minnesota 55415-1316 (612)673-2656 christopher.hudok minnea oli mnnn pv_ I State's Authorized epresentatlwe: Federal Funding: CFDA 20.600,20.608,20.616 Bruce Johnson 445 Minnesota St Suite 150 State Funding: None St.Paul,Minnesota 55101-5150 (651)201-7067 Special Conditions:Attached and incorporated into bruce.a.'ohn on 4a e.mnrus this i ant • # menti See Lit:- 3. Under Minn. Stat. §299A,01. Subd 2(411 the State is empowered to enter into this grant agreement. Term: Effective date is the date shown above or the date the State obtains all required signatures under Minn. Stat. § 16B.98,subd.7,whichever is later. Once this grant agreement is fully executed,the Grantee may claim reimbursement for expenditures incurred pursuant to the Payment clause of this grant agreement. Reimbursements will only be made for those expenditures made according to the terms of this grant agreement. Expiration date is the date shown above or until all obligations have been satisfactorily fulfilled,whichever occurs first. The Grantee,who is not a state employee,will: Perform and accomplish such purposes and activities as specified herein and in the Grantee's approved 2015 Toward Zero Deaths TD Enforcement Grant Application("Application")which is incorporated by reference into this grant agreement and on file with the State at 445 Minnesota St Suite 150 St.Paul,MN 55101-5150. The Grantee shall also comply with all requirements referenced in the 2015 Toward Zero Deaths(TZD)Enforcement Grant Guidelines and Application which includes the Terms and Conditions and Grant Program Guidelines taps; v E ra tsts ,which are incorporated by reference into this grant agreement Budget Revisions: The breakdown of costs of the Grantee's Budget is contained in Exhibit A,which is attached and incorporated into this grant agreement. As stated in the Grantee's Application and Grant Program Guidelines, the Grantee will submit a written change request for any substitution of budget items or any deviation and in accordance with the Grant Program Guidelines. Requests must be approved prior to any expenditure by the Grantee. Matching Requirements: If applicable.)As stated in the Grantee's Application,the Grantee certifies that the matching requirement will be met by the Grantee. Payment: As stated in the Grantee's Application and Grant Program Guidance,the State will promptly pay the Grantee after the Grantee presents an invoice for the services actually performed and the State's Authorized Representative accepts the invoiced services and in accordance with the Grant Program Guidelines. Payment DPS Grant Agreement non-state(OTS 04/14) ����u� �n Q��6 4 r W f 1� II�`V io uullIu Miilll r ° yup ���h 4- * I,• illi�h�,r,i�u r'nJIS�r I�ui�14n nu a'91i Iry IW} � @�i r�IlNr�w'4 h I��umgll�„fl���111,41�iW I. Mn% "IIIIIV �MIW^ ui Grant Agreement Page 2 of will not be made if the Grantee has not satisfied reporting requirements. CertificationCertificaiion Regarding Lobbying: (If applicable.) Grantees receiving federal funds over$100,000.00 must complete and return the Certification Regarding Lobbying form provided by the State to the Grantee. 1. ENCUMBRANCE VERIFICATION . STATE 1%GENCY Individual fees gnat frim have been encumbered as required by Minn Stat.H I•.'.15and I6C05 ;% / (with //. d sy�i4III Y Signed: �( 1� � .� Tide: / Date. ae4Y Date: ///A. f„dssa Grant Agreement No.A-ENF C 1 - 01 ,-I L FD-00032 2. GRANTEE The Grantee certifies that the appropriate Per s) have executed the grit agreement on behalf of the Grantee as required by applicable articles,bylaws,resolutions,or ordinances. By: ,.,d,.,< � � r`,, �P uuuu r irtr— ..idiuo iii .»�l.Go✓r�✓,a,. ,. .._ i F � Tltle. a' N Wi, ; Date: B . - Distribution: DPS/FAS 'Title Grantee states Authorized Representative sentative Date: r w rcrrrrrrmovnmmumarmr eeirm rrYivuirrk,,,,,.. --- ----•••• � DPS Grant Agreement non-state(OTS 04114) CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS Con :. act Signature Page Subject: Minnesota De 1 ailment of Public Safe —Office of Traffic Safe —Towards Zero Deaths(TZD)Enforcement Program Committee: W&M Date: October 14# 2014 Council Date: October 1 ,X014 - - Finance and Commerce Date: October 25. 2014 By: i, eN ,i 1,i1.,1 i 1, 1B.‘ 2 0 I Enterprise Contract Administrator Approved as to Form. , Assistant City Attorney By: ?#14 j"794240-- Finance Director-Police • ., Grant Agreement Page 3 of Special Conditions Minneapolis Police Department is the fiscal agent for the following agencies: Crystal Police Department Golden Valley Police Department Hopkins Police Department Minneapolis Park Police Department !I New Hope Police Department Robbinsdale Police Department DPS Grant Agreement non-state(OTS 04/14) CSI o ea a. 141 LY . g a a odoE to E ea co C' 43 'Tr 0 1 rad �1 iJlr 0 0 IIOY ^^II. C iiV (1 100,00„ a lG II m m 101 ) c"'II�I. ` 0 ' r 4 �, c°Jiji°Ji°1:1 lUl‘ D "➢ . I �� in IIIm� I uer� r ref rr iVN Iglu Vide"ryry p�C' � II �`IIIII'.��:, A • ; inistu.a��i� c e�ui � I,,,,��,.I ;.d�� � � IIff7iIIffv ,�I I, amiIa u N e Sc v u ul,c Imo" w r <<< a X u u it.I 763-593-8013 u 763-593-3969(fax)U Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting January 20, 2015 Agenda Item 3. J. Annual Election for the 2015 Insurance Policy Prepared By Sue Virnig, Finance Director Summary Cities can waive the statutory liability limits, in which case, the damages compensated could be up to the amount of the coverage carried. Staff recommends that the City does not waive the statutory limits on tort liability established by Minnesota Statues 466.04 for the 2015 insurance policy. The policy is a February 1 renewal. The League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust (LMCIT) requires each city to approve the election through a resolution. Attachments • Resolution Making Annual Elections for the 2015 Insurance Policy (1 page) Recommended Action Motion to approve Resolution Making Annual Elections for the 2015 Insurance Policy. Resolution 15-08 January 20, 2015 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION MAKING ANNUAL ELECTIONS FOR THE 2015 INSURANCE POLICY WHEREAS, the City of Golden Valley must declare whether or not to waive the statutory limits on tort liability established by Minnesota Statutes 466.04; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council for the City of Golden Valley that it does not waive the statutory limits on tort liability established by Minnesota Statutes 466.04 for the 2015 insurance policy. Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by the City Clerk. t )111 14011,01P, (111 I 101 U�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII u " IIV 0 G I �,,0,1 (IriYlp fISG d r.. 0 Ul i VQidi �UI ( r"I"�. �uIIl IIYN Nlllil liu^•uJ ouuuuuuuuuWuIuIIu"uu IIWIIII iwf I�NN'I�� iil�Bmtwo' ` City d 00 IY o �m s IV nI 763-593-8003 763-593-8109(fax) mNNNNNNNmmNmmNmmNmmNmmNmmNmmNmmNmmNmmNnEmNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNmmN ar. u Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting January 20, 2015 Agenda Item 3. K. Approval of 2015 Government Affairs Priorities Prepared By Thomas Burt, City Manager Summary For a number of years the City Council has adopted legislative policies in order to share local priorities with area legislators and seek their assistance in forwarding these priorities. At the January 2015 Council/Manager Meeting the Council reviewed its 2015 Government Affairs Priorities. If the document adequately addresses the Council concerns, it should be approved. Attachment • City of Golden Valley 2015 Government Affairs Priorities dated January 20, 2015 (21 pages) Recommended Action Motion to approve the City of Golden Valley 2015 Government Affairs Priorities. cityof...twomothrl 00.4101.000.,,1011111111"111111111111"A 11r1V0 .1)illiiiIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII!1111111111111111 � oil Vaii9 III 2015 G p ete 7800 Golden Valley II 55427 763-593-8006 Draft for City Council review January 20,2015 Table Of Contents 1. Public Safety Improvements At DouglasDrive/Hwy 55 Intersection .................................................2 2.Joint Water Commission Infrastructure Improvement Funds........3 3.DeCola Pond Area Flood Mitigation Funds......................................4 4. Golden Valley Community Center Capital Improvement Funds....5 5.METRO Blue Line Extension Funds.................................................6 6.Metropolitan Council Inflow/Infiltration Grants— PublicAnd Private Improvements.....................................................7 7. Oppose Levy Limits............................................................................8 8. Inclusion Of Motor Vehicles For City Sales Tax Exemption............9 9. Improve Local Government Public Information NotificationProcedures.,..........o....o.......0.........0..............0..0....0.00........ 10 10.Emerald Ash Borer Disaster Assistance .......................................... 11 11. Support Early Voting Initiatives....................................................... 12 12. Support Tax Incentives For Community Reinvestment................ 13 13. Update Fiscal Disparities Formula .................................................. 14 Appendix1............................................................................................... 15 Appendix2............................................................................................... 16 Appendix3............................................................................................... 17 Appendix4............................................................................................... 18 Appendix10.........................................................................................0- 19 7800 Golden Valley Road,Golden Valley,MN 55427 763-593-8006 page 1 1. Public Highway Issue In July 2008,the City of Golden Valley officially began a study of its Douglas Drive corridor(County Road 102),which runs from Olson Memorial Highway(Highway to Medicine Lake Road(County Road 70).To continue addressing suggestions identified in the Douglas Drive Corridor Study to improve driver and pedestrian safety as well as traffic efficiency,the City is partnering with Hennepin County to implement a 2016 reconstruction project that would add turn lanes,allow for shoulders and bike lanes,improve sidewalks,install streetlights,and place existing above-ground utilities underground.The project has an estimated cost of about$23 million.The City's portion of the project will be approximately$13 million,and Hennepin County will pay approximately$10 million. In addition,as part of the preliminary design process,concepts have been developed to improve the intersection of Hwy 55 and Douglas Drive.To the south of this intersection is the Perpich Cen- ter for Arts Education High School.The existing intersection has significant congestion and confus- ing turning movements,bus stops,and a high level of pedestrian usage that have resulted in an unsafe intersection with a high number ofvehicle crashes.Funding for thwork at thintersection of Highway 55 and Douglas Drive has not been secured. City Position The City of Golden Valley seeks funding to improve operations,safety,and mobility at the inter- section ofHighway 55 and Douglas Drive. Future improvements would better accommodate vehicles,pedestrians,transit,etc. Additional Documents (See Appendix 1) Project Overview:TH 55 and Douglas Drive Intersection Improvements(1 page) • Funding Map:Douglas Drive/Hwy 55 Intersection (1 page) • Current Map: Hwy 55&Douglas Drive page) City of Golden Valley r- 2015 Government Affairs Priorities Page 2 2.Joint Water Commission Infrastructure Improvement Funds Issue The cities of Crystal,Golden Valley,and New Hope are members of a joint powers organization called the Joint Water Commission(JWC)that provides potable water to approximately 70,000 residents and businesses of the three communities.The JWC purchases water from the City of Minneapolis and pumps it through two supply lines from Minneapolis into reservoirs in Crystal and Golden Valley. Following the June 2013 storms,the supply line into the Crystal reservoir,which is located within County Road 9,experienced a pipe failure.The water main break occurred in the portion of the 36- inch diameter pipe that is located within the City of Robbinsdale.The watermain break resulted in significant damage to homes and businesses from water and sanitary sewer backups.The total repair costs and damage mitigation was approximately$500,000. During the summer of 2014,the supply line failed again,with similar damages to businesses and homes.Again,the total estimated repair costs and damage mitigation is approaching$500,000. Following the 2014 break,the JWC conducted testing of the supply line piping and determined that portions of the pipe are at high risk of failure due to premature degradation of the pipe. Based upon these test results,the JWC is currently in the process of designing a pipe rehabilitation project for implementation in 2015.The estimated cost of this rehabilitation is$4 to$5 million. City Position The City of Golden Valley,on behalf of the Joint Water Commission,is seeking legislative funding to rehabilitate the 36-inch supply line to the Crystal reservoir to minimize the risk of extensive property damage due to pipe failure.The project will also reduce the risk of future property dam- age due to pipe failure and ensure the supply of potable water to the JWC member cities. Additional Documents (SeeAppendix 2) • Map:Joint Water Commission Infrastructure(1 page) [coming Friday] 7800 Golden Valley Road,Golden Valley,MN 55427 763-593-8006 Page 3 I DeCola Ponds Area Flood Mitigation Funds Issue The DeCola Ponds area is located in the north central portion of Golden Valley and is near the intersection of Medicine Lake Road(County Road 70)and Winnetka Avenue(County Road 156). Since the DeCola Ponds area was developed in the early 1970s,a number of homes adjacent to the six ponds in the neighborhood have experienced repeat flooding that has included significant property damage.In addition,there has been significant flooding on Medicine Lake Road as well as in the residential neighborhood in New Hope north of the roadway.The roadway flooding, which most recently occurred in 2006 and 2010,has resulted in property damage and closure of this heavily traveled county road. Approximately one square mile of area drains to the DeCola Ponds and Medicine Lake Road areas that experience frequent flooding.This drainage area consists of portions of New Hope,Crystal and Golden Valley.The three cities performed a flood mitigation study in this area that identified 41 properties at risk for repeat flood damage.The study also identified potential measures to miti- gate the damages and a number of projects that could be implemented together,or in combina- tion,that would reduce flood risk.The estimated costs for these improvements ranged from $4 to $24 million. City Position The City of Golden Valley is requesting legislative approval of funds to implement flood damage reduction efforts within the DeCola Ponds and Medicine Lake Road watershed.These projects would include improvements within the Cities of Crystal,New Hope and Golden Valley and would include flood storage,subwatershed diversion,and runoff rate control projects. Additional Documents (See Appendix 3) • Map:Decola Ponds Flood Mitigation Area (1 page) • Funding Overview:Decola Ponds Flood Mitigation Project(1 page) Page 4 City of Golden Valley 2015 Government Affairs Priorities 4. Golden Valley Community Center Capital Improvement Funds Issue Golden Valley's Brookview Community Center has served the community and residents from the metro area for almost 50 years.The building was initially constructed in 1918 as a private facility and purchased by the City in 1967.After a number of additions and remodeling projects,it has deteriorated to the point that it needs to be completely replaced.The Golden Valley City Council appointed a Community Center Task Force in 2014 to develop a vision,conceptual design,and es- timated budget for a new community center to be a gathering place for Golden Valley and metro area residents.The proposal was presented to the Golden Valley City Council in December 2014 for an estimated construction budget of$38 million.Proposed amenities include a large meeting and banquet space,multi-use community rooms,a community theater/presentation room,senior area with program rooms,kids indoor play area,golf operations,and parks and recreation opera- tions. The City would like to continue to provide gathering places,meeting rooms,and large event space for community groups and organizations.However,the estimated $38 million is an amount unsustainable through City funds alone. City Position The City of Golden Valley supports procuring funding assistance through federal,state,and coun- ty sources to help the City with the replacement of the outdated and deteriorating Brookview Community Center. Additional Documents (See Appendix 4) • Cost Estimate:Golden Valley Community Center Capital Improvement Project(1 page) • Cost Estimate Breakdown:Golden Valley Community Center Capital Improvement Project(1 page) 7800 Golden Valley Road,Golden Valley,MN 55427 763-593-8006 Page 5 S. METRO Blue Line Extension Funds Issue In December 2012,the City of Golden Valley officially endorsed the Light Rail Transit(LRT)B-C-D1 alignment as the Locally Preferred Alternative for the Bottineau Transitway.The Metropolitan Council later adopted the Bottineau Transitway Locally Preferred Alternative into the Metropolitan Transportation Policy Plan.The Bottineau LRT is planned to enter Golden Valley along the Burlington Northern Santa Fe(BNSF) Railroad Corridor in the south and travel adjacent to parkland,residential,and institutional areas on the east side of Golden Valley. The Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority is currently beginning the Station Area Planning process for two potential station locations in Golden Valley.Issues surrounding potential stations,located at the proposed LRT's intersection with Golden Valley Road and Plymouth Road, must be identified and studied.The designation of the LRT B-C-D1 alignment also enables future environmental study and engineering work to occur. The Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority,in collaboration with the Metropolitan Council and the cities of Golden Valley,Minneapolis,Robbinsdale,Crystal,and Brooklyn Park,continue to work toward identifying and mitigating issues surrounding the eventual construction and implementation of the Bottineau LRT.Additional funding for future study and community outreach efforts is necessary to ensure that the project moves forward. The Bottineau LRT is part of a broader plan to expand mass transit options in the Minneapolis/ St Paul metropolitan area.As the region continues to grow,investment in an enhanced transportation network is essential.There are currently six additional regional transitways currently under study or development in the region.Increased funding for the development of light rail transit and bus rapid transit is essential for the growth and well-being of the Minneapolis/St Paul metropolitan area. City Position The City of Golden Valley urges support of light rail transit and bus rapid transit options,and seeks funding to enhance study and community outreach efforts for issues surrounding the development of the Bottineau LRT. Page 6City of Golden Vailey�2015 Government Affairs Priorities 6. Metropolitan Council Inflow/Infiltration Grants Public And Private Improvements Issue The Metropolitan Council Environmental Service's(MCES)Water Resources Management Plan es- tablished an inflow and infiltration (1/1)surcharge in 2007 on cities determined by MCES to be con- tributing unacceptable amounts of clear water to the MCES wastewater treatment system.Since the inception of the surcharge program,50 cities have been identified as excessive 1/1 contribu- tors.This number is subject to change,depending on rain events,and any city in the metropolitan area could be affected. The City of Golden Valley is a leader in the metropolitan area in addressing inflow and infiltration from public and private sources.The City has made significant investment to address 1/1 issues in the municipal system.In addition,through the City's Inflow and Infiltration Ordinance,significant investment has been made by property owners to reduce 1/1 from private sewer services. City Position Because 1/1 reduction efforts benefit the entire metropolitan area,the City of Golden Valley sup- ports the state providing continued capital assistance for grants to cities as well as financial assis- tance through future Clean Water Legacy Act appropriations. 7800 Golden Valley Road,Golden Valley,MN 55427 763-593-8006 Page 7 7. Oppose Levy Limits Issue Levy limits undermine local budgeting processes,planned growth,and the relationship between locally elected officials and their residents by allowing the state to decide the appropriate level of local taxation and services,despite varying local conditions and circumstances. For example,while working on its Capital Improvement Program(CIP),the City of Golden Valley reviews many revenue sources for financing future needs of the City.Levy limits make it impos- sible for the City to plan accurately for renewal of its infrastructure without compromising its bond rating. City Position The City of Golden Valley and Metro Cities strongly oppose levy limits. Page 8 City of Golden Valley•�2015 Government Affairs Priorities 8. Inclusion of Motor Vehicles For Sales Tax Exemption Issue The City of Golden Valley is exempt from sales tax for most purchases except for business pur- poses(for example, Brookview Golf Course).The City is not exempt for motor vehicle purchases, because the sales tax exemption did not include the motor vehicle tax of 6.5 percent.Although police(marked)and fire vehicles are tax exempt,dump trucks that are used for snowplowing and road repair are not. City Position The City believes all City vehicles are necessary to respond to the needs of the City and supports including motor vehicles in the sales tax exemption. 7800 Golden Valley Road,Golden Valley,MN 55427 763-593-8006 Page 9 9. Improve Local Government Public Information Notification Procedures Issue To keep the public updated and informed,state law requires local units of government to publish various official notifications and documents in newspapers and often dictates which newspapers receive cities'publication business.The number and variety of documents cities are required to publish,as well as the costs of publication,are burdensome. The media and newspaper industry continues to experience significant changes and declining subscriptions.At the same time technological advancements have expanded options cities can use to provide information to citizens,and citizens are demanding and expecting it.These new technologies are often more efficient,widely and easily accessible,and cost effective.Current state law regarding public access to city codes of ordinances should also address these changes for how citizens,the private sector,and other entities will have access to alternatives to existing news publications to obtain official government notices,documents,and information. City Position The City of Golden Valley believes the Legislature should eliminate outdated or unnecessary publi- cation requirements and that cities should be authorized to: • take advantage of new technologies to increase the dissemination of information to citizens and potentially lower the associated costs • designate an appropriate daily/weekly publication • use alternative means of communication,such as city newsletters,cable television,video streaming,e-mail,blogs,and city web sites • expand the use of summaries where information is technical or lengthy • publish and provide public access to local codes of ordinances on a website and to post revi- sions and changes to city codes,resolutions,and rules on the city website,when feasible Page 10 City of Golden Valley O 20'15 Government Affairs Priorities 10. Emerald Ash Borer Disaster Assistance Issue The Emerald Ash Borer(EAB) is a destructive beetle that has killed tens of millions of ash trees throughout thMidwest Thbeetle was first discovered in the Minneapolis area in 2009 and has currently been identified within two miles of the Golden Valley border. The City of Golden Valley proactively developed an EAB Management Plan in 2010 and updated it in 2012 to include a complete public tree inventory.The inventory identified that more than 24 percent of Golden Valley's public property trees are ash.There are a total of more than 2,000 pub- lic ash trees and countless private ash trees throughout the community. The City of Golden Valley is very concerned about the total number and concentration ofpublic and private shade trees that are in jeopardy from this destructive beetle.Currently,there is mini- mal funding and resources available to mitigate for the inevitable tree impacts on public and private property. City Position The City of Golden Valley supports procuring funding through federal,state,and county sources to help the City and private property owners with removal of infested trees and reforestation activities. Additional Documents (See Appendix 7) • Map:City of Golden Valley Public Tree Inventory(1 page) a l ley,MN 55427 763-593-8006 Page (](]M Golden valley Road,Golden v IIIIM1IIM1IIM1IIM1IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIM1IIM1IIM1IIM1IIMii1NifiNdti '1"""",JiY1YYJ9J,�MIfriYM'I'NW'Y9L`d01IM1IIM1IIM1YN9IW.,bHmO➢IM1IIM1IfIn4lVflN1A114111111111M1IIM1IIM1IIIlll411111➢IIIIIIIYIII!Nh!NifiNttfMRRRRRRk1111WN&IAII4141Y9/W'h9/'J�9%TW"JJJ91%' ""'"""""w'!""°""u;PX, 1 1.10 Support Early Voting Issue Golden Valley has had a high number of voters show up to the polls every year.With no-excuse voting this year, many people came in to vote early or applied online for an absentee ballot to be sent.Although the City is happy it is more convenient for the voter,the costs are more expensive due to postage,supplies for the absentees,and additional staff hours for both regular employees and election judges for the absentee board. City Position True early voting would allow the voter to actually vote and Cities would not incur the costs of additional supplies and postage. City of Golden Valley 2015 Government Affairs Priorities Page 12 _ w °`"""'"""'"'A"�PWYYYG;""""""D1YlYlYIYIYlYlY1�;JDIT,'N%YSI"/YW1UP'Y"Y9!YY.N➢HYIIM'ti,,,, 'W'"'""'"'""'"�N'i'^''MI41141YNN1AIluNkA/WONN�".'ti"!""°"""""� "'"'"w"'+WW"""ri,'`➢XN;Y!"'"'"'4""'A"'*"""""°""'°'w'"!" "'"'"""'d`"""qE" 12. Support Tax Incentives For Community Reinvestment Issue Golden Valley ha aging residential and commercial structures that are in need of repair and reinvestment.Reinvestment prevents neighborhoods from falling into disrepair,revitalizes com- munity,and protects the tax base. Historically,thstate has funded programs to promote reinvestment in communities,including the"This ld House"prgran (which allowed owners of older homestead property to defer n increase in their tax capacity resulting from repairs or improvements to the home)and "This Old Shop"(for owners of older commercial/Industrial property who make improvements that increase the property's market value). City Position Golden Valley supports state programs and incentives for reinvestment in older residential and commercial/industrial buildings,such as,but not limited to,tax creditsand r property tax df r- ral . 7800 Golden valley Road,Golden Valley,MN 55427 763-593-8006 page1 3 �. „umimimimimimmnmirtnmirtnmimimmummumoimoimoimoimmmmmmmrci� ,. .wwwwwmummmoimoimoimoimoimoimmmmmmmmmrrarrrrr xrrmrrtrruirmiwrrtrmurertrrrtrrRoouu!awmrcrvarvarvarvarvarvarvarvarva y�rcrrnm y� - 13. Update Fiscal Disparities Formula Issue Since enacted in 1971 and implemented in 1975,Fiscal Disparities has required cities to share a portion of their commercial and industrial tax base growth with other jurisdictions.The contribu- tion amount is based on the relative fiscal capacity of each community,which is measured by the market value per capita.Because Golden Valley has a high fiscal capacity,it contributes more to the pool than it receives.In 2013,Golden Valley will contribute$5,460,857 in net tax capacity. In recent years, more commercial and industrial parcels have petitioned for market value chang- es.It may take a number of years to settle a petition,and the ruling can allow valuations to be revised for the contested year as well as up to two years prior. For example,for taxes payable 2014,the 2012 taxable market values for commercial and industri- al properties were used to establish Golden Valley's contribution to the fiscal disparities formula. In 2013,Golden Valley had many parcels petition to lower their valuations and the adjustments are lagging. City Position The City of Golden Valley supports a revision to fiscal disparities that accounts for adjustments due to correction of market values. Page 14City of Golden valley�2015 Government Affairs Priorities Appendix 1. Public Safety Improvements At Douglas Drive/Highway 55 Additional Docu- ments Project Overview: TH 55 and Douglas Drive Intersection Improvements (1 page) Funding Map: Douglas Drive/Hwy 55 Intersection (1 page) Current Map: Hwy 55 &Douglas Drive (1 page) 7800 Golden Valley Road,Golden Valley,MN 55427 763-593-8006 Page 15 r' PROJECT: TH 55 and Douglas Drive Intersection Improvements Background • Douglas Drive, TH 55 to CSAH 70, programmed for reconstruction • Funded jointly by City and County • Douglas Drive Corridor Study identifies future land use changes in corridor • Anticipated land use changes include increases in: • Corporate Campuses, Commercial/Retail, Multi-Family Residential Problem Intersection of TH 55 and Douglas: • has existing geometry problems that result in crashes and extensive delays • experiences poor driver behavior due to inadequate queue capacity / geometry • is not capable of handling traffic forecasts per anticipated land uses changes • experiences unsafe pedestrian movements due to lack of pedestrian infrastructure • is not programmed by MnDOT for reconstruction Cost • Preliminary cost estimates range from 1 M to 20M Funding • This project needs to be included in the 2014 Bonding Bill now, as Douglas Drive is scheduled for reconstruction in 2016. Legislative Assistance Needed Please assure placement of this project on the Governor's Bonding Bill for Transportation and Transit for the 2014 session. i •�••_•••trotflftp�+re.._.._.._.._. y11tel4aec lehrR - n Medicine Lake Road Pond °o'a < 'o 25th Ave N 4 K ®<� 2 a `ohestar Dr 3 0 dz c u = 24th V Ave N m >4 � Q a Madison Ave\N 0e a � Jonellen Ln z � � 0 v a a z ,��ynn—d Rd Decola Sandburg School ; I Ponds s c Madsnn Ball Fields wynnW�oa Rd _ s d Pennsylvania Pond 1 A z z >"a' Woods N 23rd Ave N o¢' z Golden Sandburg Rd Sandburg Rd MeadowsDacaia x Pond D z Westbrook o lValtlP Dried. F Isaacson o Rd z Q ea�7 PondA i Park _ Westmore Way a iV o, e O Winnetka Heights or 3 W.nnetke Height.Dt G Kenneth Way 9 Z z Dacola Decca d Pond Pond F a E C ¢ a < Duluth St Duluth St E a Wildwood Patsy Ln > " d Park 90 2 < a n A. 4 a yo Q' 3 Duluth Ln ° S yf Julia°°e — Honeoa ndf 2 e�pyhl"e Pontl 7 m u Green Valley Rd r a °,t, Wolfben,,4. We.le or Hampshire ye Y Park a °rPahh°Fr i Archer Ave N Q 't AP S q d '�a' S 4 N"� •f a 4� �� 1 U e -,, yt.i°areby°arbR a -_•--- - mow,,,,, .a. -:., - m ` L • _ x H Ysy Pau_wwrevamw .r,.. ree ° ad ed°nNaaey a .r- 90.. ry �• �.'# � s ♦+ a* .� , m cn•is Rd S � 8 a a. 41. ,D°ssett C reef o e z Rd z 6 E c °i Va 'c� of a Gold°P n Gotd°Or m Nattey � Country Club or 'o CIB°wo Co by Club c otl Ave 7 U!s m C r 5 Frg R ° a P Frontage f-'Rd Perpich Cent r F,nceye For Ads Educa Hwy 55 Cis-id¢m.".I Hwy v Ball Fields Spu,...•....,.., Ktn9ston fie °s� F` Chu zYOSI m Print Da olden Douglas Dr Funded Sourceste: 12112/2013 e -Hennepin County Surveyors Office for T Hwy 55 Intersection Not Funded Property Lines(2013)&Aerial Photography(2012). -City of Golden Valley for all other layers. x �r. � z p � J � N O N � U c a ai CL Q> 0,91 W- 1 LO , t � i , 8 r 9 a® sel6no® Ln wool&. Ln ST i l . { „ (-me tv 1 - " Cam � vA �re . q-- C47 tilt r, r,_. j �tF a y a m w \V L ® .2- v a x � 4 �� ' �L'g � '" �� •A `��.': � H rte.. Ij.� •y AIL tie y. �kj ♦c' I0000 w n x g�4 1 Jib Appendix 2. Joint Water Commission Infrastructure Improvement Funds Additional Documents Map:Joint Water Commission Infrastructure (1 page) [coming Friday] Page 16 City of Golden Valley"Wf 2015 Government Affairs Priorities Appendix 3. Decola Ponds Area Flood Mitigation Funds Additional Documents Map: Decola Ponds Flood Mitigation Area (1 page) [coming Friday] Funding Overview: Decola Ponds Flood Mitigation Project (1 page) [coming Friday] 7800 Golden Valley Road,Golden Valley,MN 55427 763-593-8006 Page 17 Appendix 4. Golden Valley Community Center Capital Improvement Funds Additional Documents Cost Estimate: Golden Valley Community Center Capital Improvement Project (1 page) Cost Estimate Breakdown: Golden Valley Community Center Capital Improvement Project (1 page) Page 18 City of Golden Valley 2015 Government Affairs Priorities city Orf goldipt"� Mey 4.3 Cost Estimate Below is a summary of the cost estimate for the preferred building option. Building Vision Estimate $33,557,555 • Demolition of existing building • New 80,751-square-foot building ($320/sf) • Project soft costs (30%construction cost) Site Vision Estimate $4,823,819 • Parking/site work • Golf improvements • Outdoor program amenities • Project soft costs (15%construction cost) Total Investment $38,381,374 Clarification Notes Specific LEED strategies evaluated during next design phase. Alternative funding methods for sustainability initiatives may be available. LEED Silver (standard industry building practice) included LEED Gold 5%+/- LEED Platinum 15%+/- Escalation in construction costs based on start date • If construction starts in Q1 2016 included • If construction starts in Q1 2017 4%+/- • If construction starts in Q1 2018 8%+/- Commission No.:2065-004- 12/31/14 14 Golden Valley Community Center Preliminary Budget Forecasting Cost Items Existing Building_ 20000 GSF New BWeiln y 20,000 GSF New Building80,751 GSF New Bulldin 82,601 GSF New Buildin M127,2618GSFunit unit s It unit s unit unit Site work Complete retaining was&plazalsidewalk replacement 5150,000Demolition Selective interior&exlenor demo 20,000 $7.50 $150,000Complete Widirlgs 20,000 $1200 $240,000 2D,000 $12.00 $240,000 20,000 512-00 $240,000 45,460 $12.00 Structure Existing structural repairs&upgrades $250,000 Enclosure New roofing and building enclosure skin 5800,000 Interiors Code upgrades-stair&elevator 5300,000 _ NewmtenorfiFout 20,000 585.00 $1,300,000 New&upgraded kitchen equipment $150,000 Mechanical New HVAC system complete 20,000 $35.00 $700,000 - Plumbing&fire protection upgrades/renovations 5250,000 Electrical New electrical system complete 20.000 $20.00 $400,000 New Building Construction-per program pricing exercise Existing Site 20,000 $290.00 $5,800,000 80,751 $275.00 5229208,525 45,640 $290.00 $13,235,600 56,516 $290.00 $16,389,640 Comer Site 38_864 $29000 $10,890560 . City Hall Site 70.752 $290.00 $20,518,080 Contingency 8 Escalation Factor 15 1 $667,500 15% $ 906.000 5% $3,366,979 15% $3,624,924 15% $5,617,986 i Building Soft Costs 30% $1,535,250 30% $2,083,8_00_ 63.% $7,744,051 30% $8,337,325 _ 30% $12,921,368 IA,E Fees,Permits,Testing,Owner Admin.Costs,Fumishings,Equipment) I - t Parking/Site New surface parking&roadways complete 560 $3,00000 51.880,000 j 579 $3,000,00:OD 0 $1,737,000 { 645 $3.00 $1,935,000 Brook-Site-Roadway.storm pond modifications $250,000 $250,000$250,000 $250,000 ComerrCny Halt site development - �" 5250.000 5250 000 Lawn Bowling Relocate existing $65,000 !65,000 565,000 $65,000 Addition new - $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 Driving Range Pavillion 400 $100.00 $40.000 400 $100.00 540,000 400 $100.00 $40,000 Patio Dintng/Screen Porch 1,150 550.00 $57,600 1150 $5000 $57,500 1.150 $5000 $57600 r.) Garden/Gazebo - 750 $100.00 $75,000 750 $100.00 $75,000 750 $100.00 $75,000 Deck/Outdoor event space 1,000 55000 $50,000 1,000 $5000 $50,000 1,000 $50.00 $50,000 Splash Pad 2,500 $100.00 $250,000 Relocate tennis courts 4 $35,000.00 $140,000 Puffing Course $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 Replacement/Upgrade of Putting Green 530,000 $30,000 $30.000 Driving Range Improvements $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 Irrigation-Budding Site and Goff Course Improvements $260,000 $250,000 $250,000 Contingency 8 Escalation Factor _ 15% $0 15% $47.250 15% 5547,125 16% $651,675 15% $522,875 I Site Amenities Soft Costs 15% $0 15% $54,338 15% 5629,194 15% $719,426 15% $716,306 (A/E Fees Permit,.Testing,OwnerAdrwn,Costs) 3 4 I Potential Phased Construction BidOkvieW 526,)&),073 531,105,934 Alfemete Slte {:. 515,490,937 j10,378,341 zgssooa-og 1gr3rzpla Appendix 10. Emerald Ash Borer Disaster Assistance Additional Documents Map: City of Golden Valley Public Tree Inventory(1 page) 7800 Golden Valley Road,Golden Valley,MN 55427 763-593-8006 Page 19 rl Ash Only 1 eor W40 All -I Location Tees Total Good Fair Poor Dead/Dying # • VV® # % # % # % # % # % • I' 4 City Parks', Streetscapes,Medians 1,908 415 21.8% 339 81.7% 72 17.3% 3 0.7% 1 0.2% • s• ) e III Brookview Golf Course 1,546 437 28.3% 171 39.1% 210 48.1% 51 11.7% 5 1.1% •� 1 \ 9 City Campuses, Fire Stations, Cemetery 436 34 7.8% 29 85.3% 2 5.9% 2 5.9% 1 2.9% • • VIM •lb • 1 1 p Boulevards 3,466 810 23.40 310 38.3% 330 40.7% 156 19.3% 14 1.7% 0Nature Areas,Vacant Lots,etc. 596 90 15.1% 25 27.8% 47 52.2% 14 15.6% 4 4.4% y� • Total 7,952 1,786 22.50 874 48.9% 661 37.0% 2261 12.7%1 251 1.42j. • i PUBLIC "note:wooded areas in the parks were not inventoried • • E 1 \ i TREE INVENTORY 7 o tI • • II 00 !� • - E \�� o f� �� to 'I�• „�• r Tree Types 1 40 to Ash 160 \ to • • �" � , E, r • • •� \ .__ Other Deciduous (Shade trees) • t �� �n 0 • , Coniferous (Collected in all parks and golf course) ! •s s • ! • � �, \ - ` p� (Collected in some boulevards) 00 • • • I o • • • t ��it OF ! ••• �.•am R� o �, City Properties • � P �O � �- � , I . Park • Community Facility NN' �� • 0 0 ,� C � = �; • . • � �. Nature Area w Q \� c, ! • �� Unmanaged Property • /410%NC � I` O- I —ji Areas Not Inventoried ,�• . • � 1 State & County rights-of-way V<" -j 4 I •• too • ate e 0% 01 1 Ej 04 W_..i Last Updated: 12/2/2013 Print Date: 12/3/2013 City of Golden Valley I E 7800 Golden Valley RoadY Feet Golden Valle ,MN 55427-4588763-593-8030 `-Li- -- --`------- --� 0 750 1,500 3,000 4,500 www.goidenvalleymn.gov Ash° IIOY ^^II. a lG II 0i�� r,'1 Im I III mlll li I�I. lolwu ili w 111111' III0 e I�IIIIII �I ` NI1 fVi1oloYoYl�lol� ���� �I� �1 loom'Mk � ➢ i 116 t I 6�11�°(Illl�� IIVIIlIbIIbII�IIlIIIuII�II�u>��., �uuu�aaww�'� I i� ger r ref rr iVN um Vide"ryry plC' �`IIIII'.��:, A • ;.,,,, iii ,,� I n� ��i� cul e�ui o� I,,,,��,. i� � IIff 7i IIff II �� � V, a m, i ry II III �( �pbu ��III III W Y ullullllll II r r X MI i 11 III S w N eSc v III,c Imo" w r <<< Ili t 763-593-8013 I 7631-5 3-3969(fax), Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting January 20, 2015 Agenda Item 3. L. Second Consideration - Ordinance #537 -Amending Chapter 5: Alcoholic Beverages Licensing and Regulations and Resolution Approving and Directing Publication of Ordinance Summary Prepared By Kris Luedke, City Clerk Summary Staff is recommending changes to the City Code regarding alcoholic beverage licensing to allow for small breweries and taprooms. The recommended changes to Chapter 5: Alcoholic Beverage Licensing and Regulation, include the addition of new Sections 5.33: Off-Sale Small Brewer License, 5.34: On-Sale Brewer Taproom License, 5:35: Brewpub Off-Sale Malt Liquor License and amendments to Sections 5:01 Definitions, and 5:41 Sunday Sales. The first consideration of this ordinance was presented at the January 6, 2015, Council meeting. If Council adopts the ordinance on second consideration, it will be effective upon publication. Attachments • Ordinance #537, Amending Chapter 5: Alcoholic Beverages Licensing and Regulations (3 pages) • Resolution Approving and Directing Publication of Title and Summary of Ordinance (1 page) Recommended Action 1. Motion to adopt on second consideration, Ordinance # 537, Amending Chapter 5: Alcoholic Beverages Licensing and Regulation. 2. Motion to adopt Resolution to approve and direct the publication of the title and summary of Ordinance 537. ORDINANCE NO. 537, 2ND SERIES AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE Adding New Sections 5.33: Off-Sale Small Brewer Liquor License, 5.34: On-Sale Small Brewer Taproom License and 535: Brewpub Off-Sale Malt Liquor License and Amending Sections 5.01: Definitions and 5:41 Sunday Sales The City Council for the City of Golden Valley hereby ordains: Section 1. City Code Section 5.01: Definitions is hereby amended to add a new definition #6: Brewpub to read as follows with subsequent subsections renumbered as needed. 6. Brewpub: A Class III Restaurant establishment, as defined in City Code, that is also licensed by the City to brew malt liquor, such as beer or ale, on site for sale and consumption on the premises, or for sale in sealed containers for consumption off the premises. Section 2. City Code Chapter 5 is hereby amended to add the following new section 5.33: Section 5.33: Off-Sale Small Brewer Liquor License Subdivision 1. Off-Sale Small Brewer Liquor License A brewer licensed by the Commissioner of Public Safety to brew up to 3,500 barrels of malt liquor per year may with the approval of the Commissioner of Public Safety be issued a license by the City for off-sale of malt liquor subject to the following conditions: A. The malt liquor sold off-sale must be produced and packaged on the licensed premises. B. Off-sale of malt liquor shall be limited to the legal hours of off-sale and the malt liquor sold off-sale must be removed from the premises before off-sale closing time at exclusive liquor store. C. The malt liquor sold off-sale shall be packaged in 64-ounce containers commonly known as "growlers" or in 750 milliliter bottles and shall have the following requirements for packaging: 1. The containers or bottles shall bear a twist type closure, cork, stopper or plug. 2. At the time of sale, a paper or plastic adhesive band, strip or sleeve shall be applied to the container or bottle and extend over the top of the twist type closure, cork, stopper or plug forming a seal that must be broken upon opening of the container or bottle. 3. The adhesive band, strip or sleeve shall bear the name and address of the brewer/licensee selling the malt liquor. 4. The container or bottles shall be identified as malt liquor, contain the name of the malt liquor, bear the name and address of the brewer/licensee selling the malt liquor, and the contents in the container packaged as required herein shall be considered intoxicating liquor unless the alcohol content is labeled as otherwise in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Rules, part 7515.1100. Section 3. City Code Chapter 5 is hereby amended to add the following new section 5.34: Section 5.34 On-Sale Small Brewer Taproom License Subdivision 1. On-Sale Small Brewer Taproom Liquor License A brewer licensed by the Commissioner of Public Safety to brew up to 3,500 barrels of malt liquor per year may be issued a license by the city for on-sale of malt liquor subject to the following conditions: A. The malt liquor sold on sale for consumption must be produced by the brewer on the licensed premises. B. No other beverages containing alcohol may be sold or consumed on the licensed premises. C. The hours of operation shall be limited to the hours set forth in Minnesota Statute 340A.504 subd. 2. Section 4. City Code Chapter 5 is hereby amended to add the following new section 5.35: Section 5.35: Brewpub Off-Sale Malt Liquor License Subdivision 1. Brewpub Off-Sale Malt Liquor License A brew pub off-sale malt liquor license may be issued, with approval of the Commissioner of Public Safety, to brewer who holds an on-sale intoxicating or 3.2 percent malt liquor license issued by the city for a restaurant operated in the place of manufacture, subject to the following conditions: A. The malt liquor sold off-sale must be produced and packaged on the licensed premises. B. Off-sale of malt liquor shall be limited to the legal hours of off-sale and the malt liquor sold off-sale must be removed from the premises before the applicable off-sale closing time at exclusive liquor stores. C. The malt liquor sold off-sale shall be packaged in 64-ounce containers commonly known as "growlers" or in 750 milliliter bottles and shall have the following requirements for packaging: 1. The containers or bottles shall bear a twist type closure, cork, stopper or plug. 2. At the time of sale, a paper or plastic adhesive band, strip or sleeve shall be applied to the container or bottle and extend over the top of the twist type closure, cork, stopper or plug forming a seal that must be broken upon opening of the container or bottle. 3. The adhesive band, strip or sleeve shall bear the name and address of the brewer/licensee selling the malt liquor. 4. The container or bottles shall be identified as malt liquor, contain the name of the malt liquor, bear the name and address of the brewer/licensee selling the malt_liquor, and the contents in the container packaged as required herein shall be considered intoxicating liquor unless the alcohol content is labeled as otherwise in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Rules, part 7515.1100. Section 5. City Code section 5.41 is hereby amended by changing Section 5.41 to read as follows: Section 5.41 : Sunday Sales Subdivision 1. Sunday Sales The electorate of the City having heretofore authorized the same at a general or special election, a special license authorizing sales on Sunday may be issued to hotels, restaurants, clubs or bowling centers, in conjunction with the sale of food, which have on- sale intoxicating liquor licenses and which also have seating capacity for not less than thirty (30) guests at one time. Prior to issuance of such license, the applicant shall provide the City with proof of financial responsibility for Sunday sales. A special license authorizing sales on Sunday may also be issued to a license holder of an On-Sale Brewer Taproom license for the operation of a taproom on Sundays. Section 6. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Sec. 5.99 entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 7. This Ordinance shall take effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law. Adopted by the City Council this 20th of January, 2015. /s/Shepard M. Harris Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: /s/Kristine A. Luedke Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk Resolution 15-09 January 20, 2015 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION TO APPROVE AND DIRECT THE PUBLICATION OF THE TITLE AND SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 537, 2ND SERIES AMENDING THE CITY CODE ADDING SECTIONS 5.33: OFF-SALE SMALL BREWER LIQUOR LICENSE, 5.34: ON-SALE SMALL BREWER TAPROOM LICENSE, 535: BREWPUB OFF-SALE MALT LIQUOR LICENSE, AND 5.41: SUNDAY SALES WHEREAS, the City Council of Golden Valley has adopted the ordinance specified above; WHEREAS, the City Council finds that publishing the title and summary of this lengthy ordinance would clearly inform the public of the intent and effect of the ordinance; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that City Council hereby approves the following summary to be published along with the title of the ordinance, in the manner prescribed by Minn. Stat. 412.191, subd. 4: This ordinance amends Chapter 5 of the Golden Valley City Code relating to Alcoholic Beverage Licensing and Regulations to add a new "Off-Sale Small Brewer Liquor" License, to add a new "On-Sale Small Brewer Taproom License", to add a new "Brewpub Off-Sale Malt Liquor License", to add a new license authorizing Sunday sales for qualifying hotels, restaurants, clubs and bowling centers, and to establish conditions for such licenses. The ordinance shall take effect upon publication. NOTICE: The foregoing is only a summary of the ordinance. A printed copy of the full text of the ordinance is available for inspection by any person during regular office hours at the office of the City Clerk. Adopted by a four-fifths/unanimous vote of the City Council this 20th day of January, 2015. Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by the City Clerk. Ash° IIOY ^^II. Cal IMq ii a lGII ( '1 �� ��IIII� Im I III mlll i li I�I. lolwu ili w u` IINI � a,�uifw���i 611�(Illl�lll', IVlbb�lu�u�., i r �� IIIII� IIIIIIIIIIII VIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IrtII^IIIIrtII; 0 '11 k „ 1 VYYY," ' a ml➢I , �� � I IIIe I�IIIIII IIIIIIIIIt Ill i � �fi� IIIIIII1 1111, I � I ger r ref rr iVN um Vide"ryry plC1 `IIIII'.��:, A • ;.,,,, iii ,,� I n� ��i� cul e�ui o� I,,,,��,. i� IIff 7i IIff II �� V, a m, i ry II III �( �pbu. ��III III W Y ullullllll II r r X MI i 11 III S w N eSc v III,c Imo" w r <<< Ili t 763-593-8013 I 7631-5 3-3969(fax), Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting January 20, 2015 Agenda Item 3. M. Second Consideration - Ordinance #538 - Amending the 2015 Master Fee Schedule for New Liquor License Fees Prepared By Kris Luedke, City Clerk Sue Virnig, Finance Director Summary If Council proceeds with adoption of amending Chapter 5: Alcoholic Beverages Licensing to included the addition of an Off-Sale Small Brewer license, On-Sale Brewer Taproom License and Brewpub Off-Sale Malt Liquor License, Council should also adopt the associated fees. Staff is recommending the following fees: On-Sale Brewer Taproom license - $600 Off-Sale Small Brewer liquor license - $200 Brewpub Off-Sale Malt Liquor License - $200 The first consideration of this ordinance was presented at the January 6, 2015, Council meeting. If Council adopts the ordinance on its second consideration, it will be effective upon publication. Attachments • Ordinance #536, Amending 2015 Master Fee Schedule to include new License Fees (1 page) Recommended Action Motion to adopt on second consideration, Ordinance #538, Amending the 2015 Master Fee Schedule to include new Liquor License Fees. ORDINANCE NO. 538, 2ND SERIES AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE Amending the 2015 Master Fee Schedule for New Liquor License Fees The City Council for the City of Golden Valley hereby ordains: Section 1. The 2015 Master Fee Schedule in Chapter 25 of the City Code is hereby amended by adding the following new liquor license fees: Liquor License License Renewal Date Annual Fee Off-Sale Small Brewer Liquor License 1-Jul $200 On-Sale Brewer Taproom License 1-Jul $600 Brewpub Off-Sale Malt Liquor License 1 1-Jul 1 $200 Section 2. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" is hereby adopted in its entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law. Adopted by the City Council this 20th day of January, 2015. /s/Shepard M. Harris Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: /s/Kristine A. Luedke Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk r p,p ,011111 ,11 41. 00"U�W pu°� ou�vrrJ �, 0"0��V IY � �Ilul �IIVUII�VIVIIII�II� �fI�IIlU9111 IU�IJ ��66VIIVU I I 0000 ry •g I IIIIII���III„, IIIA„„01 %II� umuw�m0°� �IIUuv� mu4pivu �� �OIIW���°"'I" �,` � �"'� V� N�� M ,11„ „ 9ll1l�1�r ICity i d nn tr a t oIIIY IV 1 ��III��IL I 763-593-3989 1 Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting January 20, 2015 Agenda Item 3. N. Human Rights Commission 2014 Annual Report and 2015 Work Plan Prepared By Chantell Knauss, Assistant City Manager Summary Human Rights Commission Chair Teresa Martin presented the 2014 Human Rights Commission (HRC) Annual Report and proposed 2015 Work Plan at the Council/Manager meeting on January 13, 2015. Attachments • Human Rights Commission 2014 Annual Report (2 pages) • Human Rights Commission 2015 Proposed Work Plan (1 page) Recommended Action Motion to file and received the Human Rights Commission 2014 Annual Report and approve the 2015 Work Plan. city0f golden '. V 2CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY �, HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION 2014 ANNUAL REPORT January 20, 2015 There are currently nine commissioners appointed to the HRC: Chair, Teresa Martin Vice-Chair, Carla Johnson Jonathan Burris Adam Buttress Simon Gotlieb Payton Perkins Susan Phelps Michael Pristash Andrew Ramlet The Human Rights Commission sponsored three activities and co-sponsored two additional activities for community participation in 2014. HRC Conversations, Martin Luther King, Jr. Day Event For 24 years the General Mills Foundation and United Negro College Fund have celebrated Dr. Martin Luther King Jr's legacy of service by sponsoring a breakfast and inspirational speaker on the holiday that honors him. 2014's live event, "Reimagine the Future" with keynote speaker Donna Brazile, was at the Minneapolis Convention Center. The HRC partnered with Spirit of Hope Church to host the live televised viewing of"Reimagine the Future." There were approximately 25 people in attendance, including City Councilmembers, Hopkins School Principals and School Board member and HRC Commissioners. HRC Conversations "Children and Mental Illness" On May 8, 2014, the HRC held the second of its Conversations events with a viewing of the TPT (in partnership with National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI)) video of"Children and Mental Illness," followed by a panel discussion with representatives from NAMI, the Silver Ribbon Campaign, PACER, and the Washburn Center for Children. There were 31 total attendees, including Councilmembers, HRC Commissioners, panelists, residents, community members and staff. The survey completed by attendees had favorable remarks about the event. September 11 Day of Service and Remembrance The HRC sponsored its second September 11 Day of Service and Remembrance in partnership with Second Harvest Heartland in Golden Valley. There were 11 volunteers that registered for the HRC event and 28 additional volunteers that participated in the event, contributing a total of 78 hours of time. The volunteers sorted and packed 4,470 pounds of food to be distributed to local food shelves. Human Rights Commission 2014 Annual Report Page 2 HRC Conversations "Adults and Mental Illness" On October 9, 2014, the HRC held the second of its Conversations series on the topic of mental health with the program, "Understanding Mental Illness in Adults." Speakers included: Ken Barlow, KSTP Meteorologist; Hugh Aylward, President of Kelly-Norton Programs and Outpatient Therapist at Headway Emotional Health Services; Cynthia Fashaw, Director of Children's Programs and Multicultural Outreach, NAMI Minnesota; and Mary Weeks, Executive Director, Walk-In Counseling Center. There were 56 total attendees, including Councilmembers, HRC Commissioners, panelists, residents, community members and staff. This has been the most well-attended HRC- sponsored event to date. The survey completed by attendees had favorable remarks and praise about the event. "Toward a More Perfect Union: Talking About the Constitution" on Equality On November 20, 2014, with the Golden Valley League of Women Voters, the HRC co- sponsored the Minnesota Humanities Center's "Toward a More Perfect Union: Talking About the Constitution" on Equality at the Brookview Grill. There were approximately 27 people in attendance including HRC Commissioners and LWV members. Budget Of the $3,500 in its 2014 Budget, the Commission expended $1,353.84 (38.7%)for event refreshments, membership dues for the Minnesota League of Human Rights Commissions and deposit for 2015 HRC Conversations programming. During the course of 2014, the HRC held ten (10) regular meetings (January - December) and sponsored/co-sponsored five (5) public events for the community of Golden Valley to participate. Respectfully Submitted, Teresa Martin, Chair 0 t y of Vk orolden , CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY VC HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION 2015 PROPOSED WORK PLAN The Golden Valley Human Rights Commission (HRC) proposes the following work plan for 2015: Genocide The Golden Valley HRC is working with the Human Rights Commissions of the Cities of Crystal, New Hope, and Robbinsdale to jointly sponsor a program on Genocide. The program will feature Dr. Ellen Kennedy of World Without Genocide, whose presentation will be an effort to share past and current events affecting genocide around the globe, to highlight how we can make a difference and with the goal of declaring April as Genocide Awareness and Prevention Month for each of the cities involved. The program is proposed to be held April 18, 2015 at the Crystal Community Center. HRC Conversations The HRC is proposing to focus their 2015 Conversations Series on Human Sex Trafficking. On May 14, 2015, in partnership with the Perpich Center for the Arts, the HRC proposes to sponsor the Blank Slate Theatre's original production of"bottom," written by members of blank slate theatre and in Partnership with Interfaith Children's Advocacy Network and performed by an all youth cast. It is proposed that an interactive discussion with the cast follow the performance. Synopsis: If the demand for sex trafficking were to end, would the supply end too? Recently defected from a sex trafficking ring, Amber Cregg has immunity, and a story to tell. Will she cooperate and aid the side of justice, or will she continue her deep allegiance to her former pimp? September 11 Day of Service and Remembrance The HRC would like sponsor its third September 11 Day of Service and Remembrance in partnership with Second Harvest Heartland in Golden Valley. This was a successful event in 2013 & 2014 and HRC would like to continue sponsoring this volunteer effort, possibly on an annual basis. Due to September 11, 2015 falling on a Friday this year, this event would be scheduled for Thursday, September 10, 2015. HRC Conversations On either October 8 or 22, 2015 the HRC is proposing to host the second of its 2015 HRC Conversations Series on human sex trafficking, possibly to consist of viewing of a video and expert panelist discussion. The exact date and program will be determined based on availability of panelists. City Council Meeting:January 20,2015 ' II t () )101t, 11 NIKO ,,• yw. , a . i it- 1100, �rrrt II �! 001 II � �Q U,. Nei u M. w,IIIIIII w�II wwISA I�IIII IIIIR iISA�i uuuuuuum�� � IflI�� ct. d mo i�I0 s i�iu t � � , 1m� ���i u���� i ��i a,m�� ��-a m m- -�i� m. A i� � ��A u u ni�s�i� �W.V 763-593-8003 763-593-8109 ax INNINNINNINNINNINNINNINNINNINNINNINNININEINEENNEENNEENNEENNEENNEENNEENNEENNEENNEENNEENNEENNEENNEENNEENNEENNEENNEENNEENNEENNEIN Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting January 20, 2015 Agenda Item 3. O. Approval of Council Assignments Prepared By Thomas Burt, City Manager Summary Each year the Council assigns Council Members to serve as representatives on various Committees and Subcommittees. As discussed at the January Council/Manager meeting the assignments are listed below. These appointments are for a one year term. Council Liaisons Board of Zoning Appeals Fonnest Civil Service Commission Clausen Environmental Commission Fonnest Human Rights Commission Snope Human Services Fund Clausen Open Space and Recreation Commission Clausen Planning Commission Schmidgall Other Assignments Beyond the Yellow Ribbon Campaign Harris, Clausen Golden Valley Business Council Harris, Fonnest, Snope Golden Valley Historical Society Board Member Schmidgall Hennepin County Bottineau Transitway Policy Advisory Committee Snope, Harris Hopkins School District 270 Cities Joint Meetings Harris Hopkins School District 270 Caring Youth Committee Fonnest Joint Water Planning and Governance Task Force Harris Legislative Liaison and Spokesperson Harris, Snope Metro Cities Schmidgall, Delegate Snope, Alternate Northwest Suburbs Cable Communications Commission Clausen Robbinsdale School District 281 Government Advisory Committee Fonnest Recommended Action Motion to make the appointments as listed above. i w �i p' u I� W( '��������d��Ali 11„. �� ��. 4 N y u, ,„ilu„II II 0 �IIIIIIIII ,4, r IU m„Vj„„�1 „ „„„, o ,^IN, tiw�"'W IV IidNuiW uUUU WV V�� im� �' I 1 l V ll � µpyl vil . ������� I'. �'.I iii �� : r � ��( „u��������i�l ( �� � °������i�� � �Al ' I i�V� iiiiiiiiiiiiiiii�ullpll � �iiiiiiiiiiilll���. � �� �iQiutl uu uu uuuuuumi I 1�6�ulw�m Ad ,,,, XH �,Nis t% N I City n,/Co u 763-593-: 991 /76--S" 3 9(fax) mummuuuuuuummuuummuuuuunmmmuuuuuunmumumnmnuunmmmuuuuunmmmuuuuunmmmuuuuunmmmuuuuunmmmuuuuunmmmuuuuunmmmuuuuunmmmuuuuunmmmuuuuunmmmuuuuunmmmuuuuuunmunm Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting January 20, 2015 Agenda Item 3. P. Approval of Additional Meetings for Council Reimbursement Prepared By Judy Nally, Administrative Assistant Summary Each year the Council reviews the list of meetings that are eligible for reimbursement. The list was discussed at the January Council/Manager meeting. Recommended Action Motion to approve the meetings for Council reimbursement as listed below: Beyond the Yellow Ribbon Campaign Golden Valley Business Council Golden Valley Historical Society Hennepin County Bottineau Transitway Policy Advisory Committee Hopkins School District 270 Caring Youth Committee Hopkins School District 270 Cities Joint Meetings 1-394 Joint Task Force Joint Water Planning and Governance Task Force League of Minnesota Cities (LMC) - Committee Meetings, Legislative Conference and Annual Conference Metro Cities -Annual Meeting, Legislative Adoption Meeting, Regional Briefings, and Committees Minnehaha Creek Watershed District National League of Cities (NLC) - Congressional City Conference in the spring, Congress of Cities in fall and Board Meetings Robbinsdale School District 281 Government Advisory Committee Senior Community Services Board TwinWest Chamber of Commerce - Mayor/Manager Meetings ! u: pV mh � NNIN rye( 4 ),,()'1101 w ,k 001 i)1 00 u' uV 0IP � 011jj;j:;II IIIIIIII HO �t U 1101 M� ell mil hhiiiiuiii V 4im WIIp E uuuIlu'uu..uouummuuluullllm'!W I ti ° W 0 1 i ` � Iu JiriraIrtkV " i i � IIJ$ rt V Io in. eiir o 763-512-2345 i 763-512-2344(fax) mummuuuuunmmmmnuunmnmmnuuEnnmmmunuEnnmnmmnuunmnmmnuunmnmmnuunmnmmnuunmnmmnuunmnmmnuunmnmmnuunmnmmnuunmnmmnuunmnmmnuunmnmmnuunmuuuuunm Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting January 20, 2015 Agenda Item 3. Q. Authorization to Sign Agreement with Hennepin County for Athletic Field Improvements at Sandburg Learning Center. Prepared By Rick Birno, Director of Park and Recreation Summary The City, in cooperation with School District#281, Park Valley Soccer Association and the Armstrong Cooper Youth Baseball Association applied for and was awarded $325,000 through the Hennepin County Youth Sports Grant Program. The grant money will be used to improve the parking access, baseball fields and soccer fields at Sandburg Learning Center. Attachment • Agreement for the Sandburg Learning Center Athletic Facility Improvement Project (10 pages) Recommended Action Motion to authorize the Mayor and City Manager to sign Contract No: A142695, Agreement for Golden Valley Brookview with Hennepin County for athletic field improvements at Sandburg Learning Center. Contract No: A142695 AGREEMENT FOR Athletic facility improvements at Sandburg Learning Center This Agreement is between the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota ("COUNTY"), A-2300 Government Center, Minneapolis, MN 55487, and the City of Golden Valley, 200 Brookview Parkway, Golden Valley, MN 55426 ("LOCAL UNIT OF GOVERNMENT "herein "LGU"). Recitals 1. Section 473.757, subd. 2 of Minnesota Statutes authorizes Hennepin County to make grants for youth activities and youth and amateur sports within Hennepin County with certain funds collected as part of the sales tax authorized in Section 473.757, subd. 10 of Minnesota Statutes. 2. Pursuant to Hennepin County Board Resolution 09-0320R3, Hennepin County created the Hennepin Youth Sports Program. The Hennepin Youth Sports Program makes grants for youth sports and activities and amateur sports within Hennepin County. 3. In 2014, as part of the Hennepin Youth Sports Program, by Resolution No. 14-0473R1, Hennepin County authorized an award of$325,000 to the LGU for Athletic facility improvements at Sandburg Learning Center. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto do hereby agree as follows: The parties agree as follows: 1. TERM The LGU agrees to complete and provide all necessary documentation for payment for the Project described in Section 2 between January 1, 2015 and July 31, 2016. 2. PROJECT, CONTRIBUTION, USE OF FUNDS, MARKETING AND REPORTING The LGU shall be responsible for construction of the "Project" in accordance with the application submitted by the LGU to the Minnesota Amateur Sports Commission. The LGU's "Application" for the Project dated 10/17/2014 is on file with Hennepin County and this Application is incorporated into this Agreement by this reference. Pursuant to the terms herein, the COUNTY shall contribute to the LGU an amount not to exceed $325,000. The LGU shall be solely responsible for securing all additional funds needed for completion of the Project. The LGU shall use all funds received under this Agreement for construction of the Project. The parties shall cooperatively and collaboratively develop Project marketing including but not limited to a permanent plaque or sign, news releases, public announcements, social media, video, civic opportunities, logos and community events. The LGU shall not unreasonably refuse or withhold participation from any COUNTY initiated marketing project, plan or strategy. The LGU shall provide advance copy of the LGU's independently developed messaging and marketing materials regarding the Project to COUNTY for review and approval. COUNTY may, in its sole discretion, reject any proposed marketing if COUNTY determines the proposed marketing does not reflect the spirit or intent of the Project, this grant or is otherwise contrary to COUNTY's best interests. Upon completion of the project, the LGU shall provide information, data, statistics and other metrics related to the project, facilities, participants and/or related activities, including but not limited to usage numbers, who is using the park, and what changes in usage were noted. This information shall be provided within one year of completion and on an annual basis for two years thereafter. 3. PAYMENT FOR SERVICES Upon completion of the Project, the LGU shall submit a Certificate of Occupancy (when applicable) and/or an Affidavit of Project Completion (See Attachment A), as directed by COUNTY. Upon COUNTY's confirmation that the Project is complete, the LGU shall submit invoices for Project expenses with a Reimbursement Request letter in substantially the same content and character as Attachment B. If the total cost of the completed Project is less than the amount identified by the LGU in the budget the LGU submitted for the Project, the COUNTY's payment will be reduced based on a pro rata share of the difference between the budgeted amount and the actual amount. Payment shall be made directly to the LGU upon the presentation of a complete claim in the manner provided by law governing the COUNTY'S payment of claims and/or invoices. Payment shall be made within forty-five (45) days from receipt of the invoice. 4. PROFESSIONAL CREDENTIALS INTENTIONALLY OMITTED 5. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR LGU shall select the means, method, and manner of performing the services. Nothing is intended or should be construed as creating or establishing the relationship of co-partners 2 between the parties or as constituting LGU as the agent, representative, or employee of the COUNTY for any purpose. LGU is and shall remain an independent LGU for all services performed under this Agreement. LGU shall secure at its own expense all personnel required in performing services under this Agreement. Any personnel of LGU or other persons while engaged in the performance of any work or services required by LGU will have no contractual relationship with the COUNTY and will not be considered employees of the COUNTY. The COUNTY shall not be responsible for any claims that arise out of employment or alleged employment under the Minnesota Economic Security Law or the Workers' Compensation Act of the State of Minnesota on behalf of any personnel, including, without limitation, claims of discrimination against LGU, its officers, agents, LGUs, or employees. LGU shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the COUNTY, its officials, officers, agents, volunteers, and employees from all such claims irrespective of any determination of any pertinent tribunal, agency, board, commission, or court. Such personnel or other persons shall neither require nor be entitled to any compensation, rights, or benefits of any kind from the COUNTY, including, without limitation, tenure rights, medical and hospital care, sick and vacation leave, Workers' Compensation, Re-employment Compensation, disability, severance pay, and retirement benefits. 6. NON-DISCRIMINATION A. In accordance with the COUNTY's policies against discrimination, LGU agrees that it shall not exclude any person from full employment rights nor prohibit participation in or the benefits of, any program, service or activity on the grounds of race, color, creed, religion, age, sex, disability, marital status, sexual orientation, public assistance status, or national origin. No person who is protected by applicable Federal or State laws against discrimination shall be subjected to discrimination. 7. INDEMNIFICATION LGU agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the COUNTY, its officials, officers, agents, volunteers and employees from any liability, claims, causes of action,judgments, damages, losses, costs, or expenses, including reasonable attorney's fees, resulting directly or indirectly from any act or omission of LGU, a subcontractor hired by the LGU, anyone directly or indirectly employed by them, and/or anyone for whose acts and/or omissions they may be liable in the performance of the services required by this Agreement, and against all loss by reason of the failure of LGU to perform any obligation under this Agreement. Nothing in this Agreement constitutes a waiver by the LGUs of any statutory or common law defenses, immunities, or limits on liability. The LGUs cannot be required to pay on behalf of themselves and COUNTY to a third party, any amounts in excess of the limits on liability established in Minnesota Statutes Chapter 466 applicable to any one party. The limits of liability for COUNTY and LGUs may not be added together to determine the maximum amount of liability for LGUs. 3 8. DATA PRACTICES LGU, its officers, agents, owners, partners, employees, volunteers and subLGUs shall abide by the provisions of the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13 (MGDPA), the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act and implementing regulations, if applicable, and all other applicable state and federal laws, rules, regulations and orders relating to data privacy or confidentiality. If LGU creates, collects, receives, stores, uses, maintains or disseminates data because it performs functions of the COUNTY pursuant to this Agreement, then LGU must comply with the requirements of the MGDPA as if it were a government entity, and may be held liable under the MGDPA for noncompliance. LGU agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the COUNTY, its officials, officers, agents, employees, and volunteers from any claims resulting from LGU's officers', agents', owners', partners', employees', volunteers', assignees' or subLGUs' unlawful disclosure and/or use of such protected data, or other noncompliance with the requirements of this section. LGU agrees to promptly notify the COUNTY if it becomes aware of any potential claims, or facts giving rise to such claims, under the MGDPA. The terms of this section shall survive the cancellation or termination of this Agreement. 9. RECORDS—AVAILABILITY/ACCESS Subject to the requirements of Minnesota Statutes Section 16C.05, Subd. 5, LGU agrees that the COUNTY, the State Auditor, the Legislative Auditor or any of their authorized representatives, at any time during normal business hours, and as often as they may reasonably deem necessary, shall have access to and the right to examine, audit, excerpt, and transcribe any books, documents, papers, records, etc., which are pertinent to the accounting practices and procedures of LGU and involve transactions relating to this Agreement. LGU shall maintain these materials and allow access during the period of this Agreement and for six (6) years after its termination or cancellation. 10. SUCCESSORS, SUBCONTRACTING AND ASSIGNMENTS A. LGU binds itself, its partners, successors, assigns and legal representatives to the COUNTY for all covenants, agreements and obligations contained in the contract documents. B. LGU shall not assign, transfer or pledge this Agreement and/or the services to be performed, whether in whole or in part, nor assign any monies due or to become due to it without the prior written consent of the COUNTY. A consent to assign shall be subject to such conditions and provisions as the COUNTY may deem necessary, accomplished by execution of a form prepared by the COUNTY and signed by LGU, the assignee and the COUNTY. Permission to assign, however, shall under no circumstances relieve LGU of its liabilities and obligations under the Agreement. 4 C. LGU may subcontract for the services to be performed pursuant to this contract. Permission to subcontract, however, shall under no circumstances relieve LGU of its liabilities and obligations under the Agreement. Further, LGU shall be fully responsible for the acts, omissions, and failure of its subLGUs in the performance of the specified contractual services, and of person(s) directly or indirectly employed by subLGUs. Contracts between LGU and each subLGU shall require that the subLGU's services be performed in accordance with the terms and conditions specified. LGU shall make contracts between LGU and subLGUs available upon request. 11. MERGER AND MODIFICATION A. It is understood and agreed that the entire Agreement between the parties is contained herein and that this Agreement supersedes all oral agreements and negotiations between the parties relating to the subject matter. All items that are referenced or that are attached are incorporated and made a part of this Agreement. If there is any conflict between the terms of this Agreement and referenced or attached items, the terms of this Agreement shall prevail. B. Any alterations, variations, modifications, or waivers of provisions of this Agreement shall only be valid when they have been reduced to writing as an amendment to this Agreement signed by the parties. 12. DEFAULT AND CANCELLATION A. If LGU fails to perform any of the provisions of this Agreement or so fails to administer the work as to endanger the performance of the Agreement, it shall be in default. Unless LGU's default is excused by the COUNTY, the COUNTY may upon written notice immediately cancel this Agreement in its entirety. Additionally, failure to comply with the terms of this Agreement shall be just cause for the COUNTY to delay payment until LGU's compliance. In the event of a decision to withhold payment, the COUNTY shall furnish prior written notice to LGU. B. The above remedies shall be in addition to any other right or remedy available to the COUNTY under this Agreement, law, statute, rule, and/or equity. C. The COUNTY's failure to insist upon strict performance of any provision or to exercise any right under this Agreement shall not be deemed a relinquishment or waiver of the same, unless consented to in writing. Such consent shall not constitute a general waiver or relinquishment throughout the entire term of the Agreement. D. This Agreement may be canceled with or without cause by either party upon thirty (30) day written notice. If COUNTY cancels this Agreement without cause 5 upon thirty days written notice, COUNTY shall pay the LGU reasonable expenses incurred prior to the notice of cancellation. E. Provisions that by their nature are intended to survive the term, cancellation or termination of this Agreement include but are not limited to: INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR; INDEMNIFICATION; DATA PRACTICES; RECORDS- AVAILABILITY/ACCESS; DEFAULT AND CANCELLATION; PROMOTIONAL LITERATURE; and MINNESOTA LAW GOVERNS. 13. CONTRACT PROCESSING AND ADMINISTRATION The Minnesota Amateur Sports Commission ("MASC") will serve as staff liaison in the grant process administration. Responsibilities will include but not be limited to: forwarding all required grant processing documents to LGU; and forwarding appropriate documents to COUNTY for processing and/or execution(i.e., grant contract and invoice requests). MASC will serve as contact for grant administration and/or processing inquiries. Joe Mathews, or successor, shall manage this Agreement on behalf of the COUNTY and serve as contract liaison between the COUNTY and LGU. 14. COMPLIANCE AND NON-DEBARMENT CERTIFICATION A. LGU shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local statutes, regulations, rules and ordinances currently in force or later enacted. B. If the source or partial source of funds for payment of services under this Agreement is federal, state or other grant monies, LGU shall comply with all applicable conditions of the specific referenced or attached grant. C. LGU certifies that it is not prohibited from doing business with either the federal government or the State of Minnesota as a result of debarment or suspension proceedings. 15. NOTICES Any notice or demand which must be given or made by a party under this Agreement or any statute or ordinance shall be in writing, and shall be sent registered or certified mail. Notices to the COUNTY shall be sent to the County Administrator with a copy to the originating Department at the address given in the opening paragraph of the Agreement. Notice to LGU shall be sent to the address stated in the opening paragraph of the Agreement. 6 16. PROMOTIONAL LITERATURE LGU agrees that the terms "Hennepin County" or any derivative shall not be utilized in any promotional literature, advertisements of any type or form or client lists without the express prior written consent of the COUNTY. 17. MINNESOTA LAWS GOVERN The Laws of the State of Minnesota shall govern all questions and interpretations concerning the validity and construction of this Agreement and the legal relations between the parties and their performance. The appropriate venue and jurisdiction for any litigation will be those courts located within the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota. Litigation, however, in the federal courts involving the parties will be in the appropriate federal court within the State of Minnesota. If any provision of this Agreement is held invalid, illegal or unenforceable, the remaining provisions will not be affected. THIS PORTION OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 7 LGU AUTHORIZATION *LGU: City of Golden Valley By: Its: And: Its: organized under: Statutory Option A Option B Charter *LGU shall submit applicable documentation(articles, bylaws, resolutions or ordinances) that confirms the signatory's delegation of authority. This documentation shall be submitted at the time LGU returns the Agreement to the COUNTY. Documentation is not required for a sole proprietorship. COUNTY BOARD AUTHORIZATION COUNTY OF HENNEPIN STATE OF MINNESOTA BY: Chair of County Board Reviewed by the County Attorney's Office ATTEST: Deputy/Clerk of County Board Date: Date: And: Assistant/Deputy/County Administrator Date: 8 ATTACHMENT A Affidavit of Project Completion This document is to be completed for projects receiving Hennepin Youth Sports Program Grants where a Certificate of Occupancy,per Minnesota Rules 1300.0220, is not required to be issued. I hereby certify that: 1. The facility/structure listed below is not subject to the conditions of Minnesota Rules 1300.0220 2. This document shall serve in lieu of a Certificate of Occupancy. 3. The construction of the facility is completed as outlined in contract A142695 with Hennepin County 4. The facility is safe to be occupied by the public. 5. The required signage/plaque is in place per county guidelines Facility Address: PIN (if applicable): Legal Description: Zoning District: Owner Name: Address: City State Zip: Phone: Comments: Name of Grant Recipient: Name of Authorized Official (print) Title Signature Date This document is to be mailed to: Lynda Lynch Minnesota Amateur Sports Commission 1700 105th Avenue NE Blaine,MN 55449 9 ATTACHMENT B SAMPLE REIMBURSEMENT REQUEST LETTER (Submitted on Grant Recipient's Official Letterhead) (Date) Minnesota Amateur Sports Commission Attn: Lynda Lynch 1700 105th Avenue NE Blaine MN 55449 Dear Ms. Lynch: Please accept this letter as our formal request to receive the Hennepin Youth Sports Program grant funds in the amount of$ for Athletic facility improvements at Sandburg Learning Center. This letter also serves as official notification of our acknowledgement and adherence of the language and provisions of the executed grant agreement A142695. Per your request and attached for your review are copies of paid invoices totaling $ . These paid invoices equal or exceed our project's grant award. In addition, to demonstrate the project has been completed and documented as such, a copy of the Certificate of Occupancy is enclosed for your records. I trust the documentation provided is sufficient for your purposes. Please feel free to contact me if you need additional information or have any questions. Sincerely, (Authorized/Official Signature) 10 CI V Ov ivivol cvv}kl ilit, pl rt " .oiV II ul ,.� eeUW ,efie 1I9IIIIIIIJIIIIIIIIIIfIIIIII � I) 41 \\11 0AI, lid 1° 1 'He I ' �" r m � k �� �I � 0 hllllllllln�- O 11111111111111000 DlV : °VI lir 1111i lui.crrii uu VIP II, nr rrrM1 P',` �umi Ii uuum uuu 0 P� " iIl!Liii�Ii i�;eli i.ii��.:u�i.��Y�..� qi" m� �a�ra�l V,�i a u ui. M Vm t 763-593-8095 763-593-8109 pax noloommollommomoolloommolloommolloommommollommollommommollommollommonolloommollommonolloommolloollornollommorn Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting January 20, 2015 Agenda Item 3. R. Authorization of Submittal of Application to Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED) Redevelopment Grant Program Prepared By Emily Goellner, Associate Planner/Grant Writer Summary The DEED Redevelopment Grant Program helps communities with the costs of redeveloping sites. If awarded, these funds will be used on public infrastructure improvements, environmental infrastructure, abatement, and demolition. City governments must apply for funding on the developer's behalf. In order to assist with the redevelopment costs of the Laurel Ponds development site at the northeast corner of Laurel Avenue and Pennsylvania Avenue, the City is seeking authorization from Council to apply for a Redevelopment Grant from DEED on behalf of the developer of Laurel Ponds. If granted Final PUD approval, Lake West Development, LLC will build 24 detached townhomes on this site. If the grant is awarded, the Physical Development Department of the City will work with DEED and Lake West Development, LLC to administer the funds. The grant request is for$459,900.00. These funds would be used to remove asbestos from existing structures, demolish existing buildings and pavement on-site, make subgrade corrections, complete subsurface utility work, construct stormwater systems, build new private roads on-site, and complete landscaping on the perimeter of the site. If the development fails to substantially provide the public benefits listed in the grant application within five years from the date the grant is awarded, the City may be required to repay 100 percent of the grant amount. To mitigate financial risk to the City, the City will require financial securities from the developer totaling the full amount of the grant award. Grant applications are due February 1, 2015, and grant funding decisions will be made on March 1, 2015. Attachments • Redevelopment Grant Application (27 pages) • Resolution Authorizing Submittal of an Application to the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development Redevelopment Grant Program (1 page) Recommended Action Motion to adopt Resolution Authorizing Submittal of an Application to the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development Redevelopment Grant Program. FY 15 emu P .01111 or'11,0110014 1r .1,11111P P '10 41111, „1! II.ail nt 104 EmpI 1,>11 n1 1 0 nd .0,11 0,11 0.11stn„ Office of Brownfields and Redevelopment 1st National Bank Building 332 Minnesota Street,Suite E200 St.Paul,MN 55101-1351 Redevelopment Grant Application Cover Page A. 'leant(Public Entity): City of Golden Valley. Head of Applicant Agency e.g. Mayor): Tom Burt, City Manager, City of Golden ValleE. Applicant Address: 7800 Golder_Valley Road. City: Qolden Valley Zip Code: 55 2 If the applicant is a city, what form of government? Home Rule Charter X Statutory City For reference,please give the State Statute number which gives the applicant authority to carry out the activities for which you are requesting grant funds. 412.241. Project Contact for the Public.Entity: Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager,.Physical QevelQpntLDepartinent. Phone: 763-593-8099. Email: jzimmermangoldenvalleyrnn.gov. Mailing Address: 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley,.Minnesota 55427. Project Manner for this project from the Public Entity,in the event of an award Er_nilz,G610_,, Assoc to ' ars /rant Writer. Project Manager's Phone&email: (763) 593-3979—egoellner@goldenvalleymrkpv. Application Author Daniel S. Schlock. . Author's Phone&email (6)2) 83675531 --..dschhallelandhabicht.com. /,?! /, J1/ldifl, i/ it JlJlffi/oio„ %// lra,»I!J!////%r/iio»iil✓iorf/Ill.iil//✓/rr/ii/ i/ ,a!m s..... / .,J(ilG1�l ,ay,frrrffffJ cU/(ll/ I,rlAa tl!///i/ririaviii iii.ii/i,,../1 //%OOir/rr/%6////,l h Redevelopment Page 1 112211.v FY 15 Provide a written executive summary of the project,Including the applicant's involvement in the be awarded. 'wo ad'acent ro ert' are dein ur�cha� ed a sirs a the r erties are located an an 1-394 mixed used & since fami residentar onan areas (R-1 and1?incl___arrentl occupieda commercial building nctionin as a church and video production corn any, and a sins le amil home with a detached ! ra'e. All three bui din 15 will be demolished asbestos and other contaminants dealt with appropriately, b the site is divided twenty-four _PIA joss, cmrron area ouots and singlectil structures are constructed according to a c_unity development plan. Roads will be constructed_to provide the residential units access to private drivewa s and ._ara es and a 'reen area consistin# o trees a •and a i edestrian walkwa and other landscaping features will be installed. 4pplicant. the City of Golden Valley approved the rezonin o this propertyfrom mixed-use to medium density (R-3) residential. Applicant has also been working many m=on the Planned Unit Development approval process. if the grant is awarded, the Associate Planner/Grant Writer on staff; supervised by the Physical Development Director, will manc,mthe grant award and its obligations. I. SITE IDENTIFICATION AND HISTORY SITE INFORMATION I. Name of Site: Laurel Ponds One. Site Address: 305 and 34.E P n lvanfg ue,,Sou h. City, County or Township: Golden Valley. Zip Code: 55426. Acreage of Site: 3.31 acres, more_or less. Sq. Ft. of Site: sq.ft., more or less. Minnesota Legislative District# ....46 A - (Note: The Minnesota Legislature has a tool to look up legislative district numbers. You must have a precise address and know the zip code of the site. Go to: III"qIP iIIP p illli e e�(!„1„1,,,P,'„100,1000'IIIII �� I I.��a ul a ..el ul I�u I � oIA l i i I ole I. I I v l i �� el I III I ul ul u Ip IP I I I I I� IIIb l l 'I I III I I u l�� I q II 16��IIIIu VIII IP 6��IIIIV�III I i1 p l mo I glll� i1 I I I I ���IIIIV q l II IIII II III I I IIII 1,,IIII IVII 1,,,,IIII I � U 4u� � III'I � II Illu � lul II � �IIIl II III I II � IIIL. I .II �. II I ...LI III�.�..,LLIIII 11 61IIII III IIII IIII 111111�IIIIII���III illll i,116111111�III�11111��IlllmJllll���lllll��llll��ll��IIII111111�11111 Illlmlllll.I���III IIII���III(IIIIIIII�IIIII III 161111111�IIII6 II Illllml�IIIILIIIII���IV 111.1111(IIII,(IIIIIIII I IIIIIIII��IIIIII�IIII6.11116.1111 IIIlllml 11611111IIII IVII.IIII��IIIIIII1,11111�IIIII.IIIII���� ��������� (IIIIIIII ��� IIIIIIIIIIIIII�������������� ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� ,,, .,,,IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII III IIIIIIII III II IIII Is the site located within a designated Transit Improvement Area TIA` X *Yes No *If yes,please provide Station Area name:Louisiana Avenue North &Market street 2. A. Current property owner(s): ,jpjaic1heiforcL,Church International and Adan James Hier. When was the proper purchased?August2001 and December, 2 . For what amount(s)? $95OOOO and$125 1o. From whom was the property purchased?Badger Acquisition cf Mnaac LLQ', and Unknown. B. Who will develop the site?Lake West Development Company, LLC. r r rrxr✓ i m i ri i ,.0»r r � /l / �." I.,� �� � � . ,., G. r o ��4'' ntm ire t ,� s,,,.,,�,�rtul�„�,,,1, � llif,r rt' r rima% i rc r,o��i%((/(llrrrrrrrrrrrrc//!�U r �a,r IlllJlr �r w�.�p I I/��, r ,»rt>,a� ��, m ■ rm ,,r, Redevelopment Page 112211.v FY 15 Will the developer own the property at any time?_X Yes No When wasiwill the property be purchased?February and tp i f`2015. For what amount? One Million Four Hundred Ninety Seven Thousand and No/100ths Dollars 7 000. 0 oralb ares. C. Are eminent domain proceedings necessary to acquire the property on which the redevelopment will occur? If so, explain any difficulties anticipated in accomplishing the project. No. D. Who will own the site after development?Laurel Ponds LLC ae_h meowner association eventually a _he units will be trans err d to the individual homeowners. When was/will the property be purchased?2015-2017. For what amount?Each of the 2 units will be sold separafor various pricing between $300,000—600,000 per unit (appro $i0 million. 3. Provide a legal description of the site. *Note: Parcel corres i onds to 305 Penns lvania Avenue South Golden Valle Minnesota 55426. Parcel 2 and Parcel 3 corres2ond to 345 Pennsylvania Avenue South, Golden Valley, ey, Minnesota .55426. Parcel I The West 250.3 feet ofthe South 100,0 feet of the North 693. 6 feet of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter. Except the Westerly 0 feet thereof Hennepin Ca r ty_i_ in a. Parcel 2: That part of the Northeast9.itarter_of_the_Northwest Quarter of SSection 5, Township 117, Range 2L Hennepin County, Minnesota, described_c_idollows,. Commencing at c point on the East line of said Northeast Quarter of the.Northwest Quarter,Quartericlisfeet South of the Northeast corner thereof thence West parallel wih the worth line o said NortheastQuarter of the &rthwest_OuartrjoIti intersection with a line drawn parallel with and distant 250.3 feet_East f the West line ofsaid`said Northeast Quarter o the Northwest es uar a as measured red along a line parallel with the North line of said Northeast Queter of the Northwest Quarter:said scant being the actual oint o be innin the Tract to be ae er ibex• thence North parallel with the West line of theN Northeast Quarter of the Northwest No4,72fgg_t,.__thence West parallel with the North line of said Northeast Quarter of the_Norwest Quarter a distance250.3 feet to the West line of said Quarter-Quarter; thence South aloe West line of said Quartr- Quarter a distance of407.915 feet, thence East c ath the amor t'=o 'sand quarter- Qgrter a distance of 2 ..3 feet:_thence North parallel with the West fine of said Quarter- Quarter a distancef`323. feet tto alae actual i at of beginning. . cep the Westerly_30 feet thereof according_to the_United States Government Survey thereof and situate in Hennepin County, Minnesota. Parcel 3: That prof the Northeast Quarter of'the Northwest Quarter of Section_5, Township 117,Range EL Henni_ cup _M nne t o described as ffollows:_Coiijmencing at a pint on the East line r ii r rr r r rii/r r, a u r, ononoi,+ u;, w`'WP� �� f���Vwr9J �` ���(( i��l��� �(lR(,®n✓rmJ, �r" 14,...,._ ". .� ,., �"_.��"'w.:.J gk, '�I r, r lJ .._.�° __,w.iC �. ��� .0 Redevelopment Page 112211.v5 FY 15 of Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, distant 778.58South o the Northeast corner thereo • thence West ,arallel with the North line o said Northeast s uarter o the Northwekt_Qgarter to its intersection with a line drawn parallel wi FY 15 See attached Exhibit E. CU NT I FUTURE SITE USE 10. Zoning Land Use: A. Current: Industrial Commercial Residential _ Mixed-use x --- Other(Specify)1-394 Mixed Use: Subdistrict A (R-1 andil3 . B. After Redevelopment: Industrial Commercial Residential Mixed-use Other(Specify) medium density residential(R-3). 11. Current economic condition: Vacant lot Developed site X Other 12. How many buildings are currently on site? Industrial How many are occupied? _ If vacant, for how long? Commerci FY 15 17, Is the proposed new development related to the bioscience field? Describe. No, it is_housing. 18. Is the new development part of an expansion of an existing Minnesota bioscience business? No, it is housing. 19. Describe the specific activities for which DEED funds are being requested. Deed funds will applied rs: 1. Renl ova osbtos from existing structures,. 2. Demolition ofexists buildings; 3. Pavement Demolition; 4. Subgracle Correct 5. Subsurface utility or ,. 6. Construction of'st rmwat r systems, 7. Construction of new Private Road; and 8. Perimeter Landsa , IL COST ANALYSIS 20. What are the total redevelopment costs as defined on Page iii 935,050.00 21. How much money are you seeking from DEED? $459,900._00. (Up to 50%of the total redevelopment cost is eligible) 22. Fill out the budget table on the following page indicating the sources,uses, and amounts of all funds (including TIF, DEED requests, etc.) that will be used for eligible redevelopment costs as defined on Page iii. The table should indicate the total project budget,including any costs that have already been incurred. Note: The 50% local match can come from any source. Money paid for eligible work completed up to 12 months prior to the application due date can constitute local match. If costs have been incurred,please submit the invoices for which you will be seeking to use as matching costs. Public acquisition is eligible as a match cost only. '?�VIMIt "� 11 m s, vi `° .,,r ,,i ���, r,� :�,. ,,.. I � lY���„ I� .r ro,u a y and .�. ®_V t:s pm4 hr,,,. ® �` Redevelopment Page 11 .211.v FY 15 Redeve opm ent Sources and Uses of Funds ffor the Project(Budget Table) Use of Funds Public or Amount Costs Date Date Funds (Activity) Private IncurredSourceourcc ofFunds Committed land? Ili Obtain FindPrivate 20,000.00 Y 6 1 1 Private 6/1/2014 City Approvals 2/1/2015 Deed January Redevelopment Private 7,000 00 Y Private 171/2015 Grant 2015 Obtain,City Private 58,585.00 N Not Private TBD Permits Incurred TBD Land Purchase Private 1,497,000.00 N Not Private Incurred Asbestos Private 38,500.00 N Not TBD Public Deed Grant Abatement Incurred Demolition of Not TBD 305 Private 6,900.00 N Incurred Public Deed Grant Penns Ivania Demolition of Not TBD 345 Private 104,000.00 N Incurred Public Deed Grant Penns Ivania Pavement Not TBD n olitlon Private 56,100.00 N Incurred Public Deed Grant DeS bgradc Not TBD Correction Private 87,400.00 N Incurred ' Public Deed Grant Subsurface Not TBD IJtili Work Private 327,750.00 N Incurred Private t Construction of IIIII Not TBD Stormwater Private 124,200.00 Incurred Private S stems Construction of Not TBD Private load Private 167,200.00 N Incurred Public Deed Grant Perimeter Not TBD Laud apingPrivate 23,000 00 N Incurred Private Home Not TBD Construction Private 4,000,000.00 N Incurred Private se of Funds (Activity)—See page iii for a list of eligible program costs. May include activities such as demolition, infrastructure improvements, etc. Be specific. Please also indicate if this activity will be performed on public or privately owned land. Amount—Total cost of the budget line item. Costs incurred—Has work on this activity started? Date Incurred—When was this work done? Be specific, give a time range if necessary. Source of Funds—Who is paying for this activity? If it will be DEED's's portion,please note. Date Funds Committed—When were the funds secured from this source? Please attach any written funding cam 1 Iments. .'' f� .;,r/ —0 r . m, � � �� � �.:�� rl,ie✓dd I)9�pu1 � u� i 9J , ,oi Redevelopment Page 7 112211.v5 FY 15 Construction Sources and Uses of Funds for the Pro'et ;ud l et Table Construction Activity - --- Cost 03) Source of Funds Commitment Date Obtain Final City20,000.00 Private 1 15 Approvals Deed Redevelopment Grant 7,000.00 , - 2/1/2015 Obtain City Permits 58,585.00 Private 1/1/2015 Land Purchase 3/1/2015(After Grant 1,497,000.00 Private Decision) 3/1/2015(Deed Grant Asbestos38Abatement 00 Public Deed Grant Decision Date Demolition of 305 3/1/2015(Deed Grant Pennsylvania , .off PublicDeed Grant Decision Date Demolition of 345 3/1/2015(Deed Grant Penni lnia 14,0 ,0o Public Deed Grant Decision Date) 3/1/2015(Deed Grant Pavement Demolition 56,1 Public Deed Grant Decision Date 00 Public --. 311/2015(Deed Grant Subgrade Correction Decision Date) 327,750.00 Private 311 1 (After Grant Subsurface Dtili WorkDecision) Construction of 12 20 . o Private 3/1/2015(After Grant Stormwater S stems Decision) Construction of new 167,200.00 3/1/2015(Deed Grant Private R . Decision Date) 23 31112015(After Grant Perimeter LandscalinDecision) Home Construction 4,000,000.00 Private 4/1/2015--71112017 Construction Activity—May include building construction or other non-Redevelopment costs. Com Iment Date—If your construction financing is pending,please list the date you expect to close on your financing. 23. Is all of the financing in place for the final d eel op .ent of the site? Yes, but for grant funds. If yes, you must attach evidence that the funds are secure. If funds are not secure, what is the process to secure the funds and its timeline? Financing has been offered to the Developer from several sources, depending on grant funding success. Additionally, construction will take place in phases, and as phases are sold,proceeds will be used to finance additional phases. See schedule. Note: These tasks must be reflected on the Project Schedule. Redevelopment Page 112211.v5 FY 15 ISI. TAXINANT TANG T F ANALYSIS 24. Does the redevelopment project meet current tax increment financing requirements for a redevelopment district?No. 25. If the redevelopment project meets TIF requirements for a redevelopment district, describe how the site meets the requirements. NM. 26. Check the following TIF criteria that the site meets. A. Parcels consisting of 70% of the area of the tax increment financing district ,rlYIU000GG/JY1J;9Y111P, :,'P• uuu must be occupied by buildings, streets,utilities, or other improvements, and more than 50%of the buildings (excluding outbuildings) must be structurally substandard to a degree requiring substantial renovation or clearance; or B. Parcels must consist of vacant,unused, under used, inappropriately used, or infrequently used rail yards,rail storage facilities or excessive or vacated railroad rights-of-way; or C. Tank facilities (see criteria in Minn. Stat. §469.174 Subd. 10(a)(3)) D. A qualifying disaster area. 27. How much TIT will be used for the project? $0.00, we are not tinF nclsorthe project. 28. Attach a cash flow analysis that indicates how much TIF will be used towards this project. (Note: TIF should be used at maximum levels available). N/A. 29. What is the maximum amount of TIF that can be generated?N/A, 30. Is TIF being used for this development project at maximum levels available?N/A. 31. If TIF is not being used fully, or at all, describe why. The City does not have TIF availablefor thispmject. 32. Is there a gap in financing after applying TIF?N/A. If there is a gap in financing,how much is the gap? NIA. If there is a gap in financing, would DEED funding remove the gap?N/A. r ,r r«r Y qui fsi iJ r ..Ho;3v r a r u.,r,r I✓ ,» of rr rii ,,,r I IIIIIV ly rrrl i i. I i Y ,(Y II III I IIr4NaIL,,.,J ,v»uul,IlllSIIIII11frUalrf„&V!„r U int rrarvd,IlV IIIIIIIIII m,u,GurrmllYldfdSl�r a9ill l!llrtfllrarr�rrlr'hri _,uhGumrr ,SrJ J111 rv'Iri(„YyffGlll!1!!fan/I ,111111111Vl1NalrriilurJJfiJs!(6frliu�1„ i a .,v .wy: m„y,� .VFW,,Wldl��.SpI}'�w�'�Wi'(�(,,,,,,,„ .„,., mu. _.ywwww.°'wV Redevelopment P ' 112211.v FY 15 ANALYSIS OF REDEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL 33. Describe the current conditions of the site. A 'ortaon o the site is currentl occu i ied b a commercial bui din! owned and o s erated b Speak the Word Church International and their subsidiary Common Sense Approach to Life which is involved in video production for the Church. Anotherortion o the site is also currently occupied by a residential structure as veil as a garage. All buildings are operable and mrmliant with all laws ad regulations, but the sewer system beneath the commercial building. 34. Describe how redevelopment of the site will i FY 15 sites. The reduction in crime was documented statisticall with hard data in the 11 study available at ht •://www.urban.or./uloaded,d 4 2 385-covin-out.s d The Stu, showed that "redesi in. •h sical eatures reducin! the heir ht and isolation o housing units, incorporating housing into mixed-income neighborhoods„designs that encourage social interactions" were all contributin. actors to the reduction in crime. The Study also re•o rted that #roximi to transit lack o o,en s i ace around hui din.s and 'edestrian iendl develo•rent can also hel• to reduce crime. Man o these elements will be inco 'orated into the current design for the site. Accorclin2 to various sources; including usa.corm and city-data.sorra, among others, Golden Vail- Minnesota crime statistics re sort an overall downward trend in crime based on data from 14 years with both violent crime decreasing and proper crime decreasing. Based on this trend, the crime rate in Golden Valley for 2014 is expected_to be lower than in 2012. In 2012, golden Valley experienced 562 total instances of crime. It is projected that Golden Valley will experience 457 total instances ofcrime in 2015. Golden Valley ey w a assigned a crime index of 1 062.17 corns ared to Minnesota's index o 1 321.58 and the nation's index o 696.36 lower numbers indicating less crime. The city violent crime rate for Golden Valley in 2012 was lower than the national violent crime rate average by 77.62% and the ci s ro i er crime rate was lower than the nationakproperty crime rate by 12.34%. In 2012 the city violent crime rate was lower than the violent crime rate in Minnesota by . %_and the cty property crime rate was lower than theproperty crime rate in Minnesota by 2.41%.. The Laurel_-fonds_Redevelopment project incorporates a number ofthe crime-deterring 'rinci sals identi ed in the Morin' Out stu' . First the 'ro'ect will be •avidin cousin! or an area that is_in close proximity tofour major thoroughfares, including highways 394,_55, 100 and 169. The housin! 's s ro cirni. to these cooridors will re,uire concessions or sedestrians including walkways and adequate lighting, as well as convenient access to public trartation. The •fanned twen. - our 24 owner-occu s ied residential units will occu• similar lots creatin a sense of community. and create opportunities for social interaction. _These factors are consistent with the design elements listed in the study for diminishing wrongdoing in and around the development. 37. Has the site been found or suspected to be contaminated? Yes. If o, what measures have been taken to address the contamination? (i.e., Have you tested the site? Do you have an approved RAP? What are the anticipated remediation costs?) The site was discovered to be contaminated b asbestos the removal o which has alread been assessed and is planned on early in the redevelopment A 'onion tion o the site was owned and occu s ied b Mark Hurd Aerial Surve Inc. rom 1959 to the early 1.990's. As part of their normal business operations, Mark Hurd would discharge film-developing c&echemicals to the sanitary sewer under an SQG industrial waste discharge permit. In the lower level of the buildiv, a floor_trench, several connecting floor drainsJ and a sump vault collected waste liquids-prior to discharging to the sanitary sewer._ It was reported that. the floor trench, connections and floor drains--were later cleaned and inspected and determined to be in poor condition, but were filed with concrete prior to subsurface evaluation. Phase II investigation was conducted at the site by B. A, Desch & Associates in 1997. The /% , r ✓ A 1 , r y i r r✓r/. r r rrr,r r r //i mr rror,r / «rf r , a rrr r i, f r IV rJY r, i i. / /,,., IGG i// Gr ir/ r/ J /// I/rrr,Ur,✓ r /r r ..,. ( X11 uvlddd!2YfV ralYJduyLvf'21�,r 1✓✓l/!@, lf(fffft c/Ia /I////Il/, / /,,,, I l cc(�or/fu?flrarl/rlr?rul/.llllllt,nu�J,u.11 ualllllJG11111%!11/,LGf(,G/GiYNlf..tl J/„//NtrG :, Redevelopment Page 11 112211.v5 FAY 15 1997 Phase II resort dated June 13 1997 indicated the MPCA soil screenin' levels and soil re erence values were not exceeded. Based on the results o the inves i!ation a "No Further Action" assurance letter from the MPCA Voluntary Investigation and Cleanup Program dated thd25 2001 was issued or the site. 38. What will be the costs of the final development?Approximately$7,000,000 which includes land acquisition and redevelopment costs. Of these costs,how much will be private? 100%except for this grant if awarded ---- public? % Please discuss the source of these funds and whether or not the sources are committed. Much 000 the Private Financing has been secured fir the ckwiopment.costs.._ Much of the Jzdingwill be developer financed with investment from other private individuals, o ever, the project depends on grant funds fgap financing_in order fqr sources and uses offinancing balance on the project pro forma_and n o- complete the project._ This project will likely not go forward without grant funds. 39. Have all of the required local city approvals necessary for this project to proceed been obtained(planning commission,zoning, etc.) Yes. If not, what remains to be done and what is the process for completing the process of obtaining approvals? Include this information in the project timeline(Item#51). The City Council gd_cpp ro a ofthepreliminary Planned__ ni evel m n aj 1pl cat'on on September 16, 2014.. - public hearing for the final approval Planned Unit Development as s is tion will be held in Ci Council Chambers on Janua 20 2015. and when the srosect receives final Planned Unit Development approval on January.20th,2015. typical building and utility vpe permits will be_obtained.prior to commencement of construction whichshouki be an administrative tas.k_ ased on the prelim r arv an a _ D_ciya . f/ic developer has been waiting to obtain these permits until this grant round is complete to so as not to_ aake costs otheLnlgiblebqce4 on grant requirements. 40. What are the current property taxes (as determined by the County or City Assessor) for the site?Exempt and 3,204. 0. 41. What are the projected property taxes after final development?L1!4,900.Q(2. How was this figure determined? Using_the value oftie complete4 project estimated by Lake West Development and calculated using the Hennepin County Tax Estimator found_ac ht •://www.tax-rates.or. minnesoahenne sin coun 'ro•er ax##PaxCacuaor. ,IIIb///%i111J1Jlrr�rrIRllr�?1iYYf/r°r'/lryk,f �((1>�! I I .If +Yl!f�dY�?Yud)9)w,!rr 1. �`a I iiiildllly . �61f ,,rie, /i Ro,P• awawON�rrllJddd �wNrdP.y9lrrriiriirii�P�R auN 1&�G", !G1rrd,ildllrlrlyddud,IVdI?llid ;crV .,Cl"�r ,trr aiU/ i Redevelopment Page 12 112211.v5 FY 15 JOB CREATION 42. Project the number of new jobs created after redevelopment and final development of the site. (Jobs that did not exist in Minnesota prior to development) Total New Jobs: FTEs NEW JOBS TABLE Position Title I Total#of Total#of Part-time Expected Full-Time Part-Time Hours Per Hiring Date Jobs Jobs Week Homeowner's Association Manager 1 I Maintenance Manager JOB RETENTION 43. Project the number of retained jobs after redevelopment and final development of the site. (Jobs that existed either on-site or elsewhere in Minnesota prior to development) Total Retained Jobs: FTEs RETAINED JOBS TABLE N/A HOUSING DATA 44. If the site will be redeveloped for residential use, provide the following data: RENTAL: Total number of units O. Monthly rental cost per unit N/A. Number of affordable units* O. Level of affordability N/A. Construction cost per unit N/A. OWNER OCCUPIED: Total number of units Twenty-four(24). Purchase price per unit on Average $400.000.O0. Number of affordable units/homes* Potentially -.31.. 1 Based on Metropolitan Council projections on affordability under the Livable Community Standard of 80%of the Area Median Income as normalized to 2015 and published by Metropolitan Council h . //www.m trocoun lor� ETC files f f fe 951- 5 e-4495-a fa-eab9df19 7 .df` i ,T. LII° Ia. r �� .� ii d ri r. !%..r. �r•i �,��.,v4 :.,,,. �l I r'„, ,,, «rrllClClr,,1 V� uu,m�(l�. 0,,,,, u.^,ri�l6�r 1 u! ��a��:rd�,l.,a.,Ic,rl ��..,(fLld,M6al�a ,, r��L(��a@�d'..„�� 7 I �u�)d�nr�Ri,ra,� II I�, ���.. um J �� ( �r�W I Mumu s. �. y .�,. L _� w.� 1!�0�. �._ fir.. � �°lla� ��_�r ��._ �_ I i O, I _,�; � � �WI u V UtiN wvii r i r6,(l° I.�((1ll DgiiWlifa � n ND Redevelopment Page 13 112211.v FY 15 Level of affordability_ 0%of the median income based on in ormation sublished Metropolitan Council for 2013 and scaling value to 2015 levels. Construction cost per unit$16Z000.00 Estimated Housing developments should include an affordability component. The •Ian is or all residential units to be owner occu•led• however owners will have the o s tion to turn their units into rentals frzax2 rentali s� er ownefrj. OTHER PUBLIC BENEFITS 45. is this a multi jurisdictional project(a joint application,joint powers agreement,joint development agreement, etc.)?No. If so, attach a narrative and any joint agreements if appropriate. N/A. Note: Projects with other state agencies and Metropolitan Council do not constitute multi- jurisdictional projects. 46. Is there a positive environmental impact associated with this project, such as ponding or other environmental infrastructure? Yes local control o storm water Haiti•atin• the need or additional Ci wide ca s aci This pond may also serve adjoining deeorant arm Redevelopment will result in several positive environmentalimpacts to the property and surrounding pperaes._... Thew frzclude, Clean-up of asbestos that can become friable and a threat to public health; Encouragement of responsible_growth and saving land from sprawl;Air quality improv mer is from encouragement of pedestrian friendly alternatives: e savings and reduction of greenhouse gases and _finally__Water quality improvements.._and reduced stonnwater runoff. Generally speaking, any redevelopment , prg_pqrly conceived and__im emented, can improve public health and the environment, increase investment, __and....create.....Jpg- erm improvements in housing, jobs, recreational o iortuniten_space and public facilities. Without communi involvement in the c eanu• and redevelo,men o sites however even well- intended redevelopment projects may not be sustainable. Clearly the project will achieve reductions in contaminants and improvements iksublic health. By converting the commercial portjn of the site to a residential housing. development and removing the remnants f decades of commercial use, the properly will provide a cleaner, safer and reduced risk of nvirme a a trecats o nu is health. Second the ve nature redevelo•mernt is to save !reen ield sites and reduce urban sprawl The Northeast Midwest Institute estimates that "One at ,12 redeveloped brownfi_elds hbeenestirnated to conserve4.5_acres of greenfields sprawl development._,2Past experience THE ENVIRONMENTAL AND ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF BROWNFIELDS REDEVELOPMENT,Northwest Mideast Institutei 0 r ..,wi r," 8r rl,✓i. r' IfJ1f Ji .,., ,m,,w ,... rf f rir r r//r ,/fir Lrrrc r, /, rr, ,I i r, ,1,rir ,,, ,i n i /r x /r J i V 1//r , I r rbd 4 1 rr r r f(((r 1 r rrJ Yrruuulrr mY nl s r T..a / f.,I I lir r Vi/rlllw✓'feft((7 //✓(ri tl lY u,,.,,, / / / UIJztr P brr,rrlit„-„ irrir, rr'ci»y rcr%%rNiill!//ffflllrrlr+iJ0y1JIJy///!/cci;I1011ri,nJr lfllrfu/olll✓”11!„N!ii 08 Redevelopment Page 14 112211.v5 FY 15 shows that usin# brown ed such as this .ro`ect or dense residential brown .ed sites collectively signafican contrib tes to environmentally responsible accommodation of pouatiowth. Third there is direct benefit to air quality from redevelopment of this_project because of the abili o residents to use •edestrian and mass transit 0'tions or travel. Past studies have ;shown that brown reds profits, such as this one, in comparison to alternative greenfields projects can, save up to 40 percent of vehicle miles tree . This translates__ irect _ to air emissions reductions or� a ar i ni xa gni ude. Lasti the i ro'ect will result in 'ositive water 'ua a im'acts and reduced stormwater rum!. An EPA stud concluded that there are ve sig i cant water i uali bene its o dense development due to lowered nin-otrper_dwelling unit. This development will have a new state of the art Stormwater management system that_internaes rrolf_for the most part and prevents sheet- ow releases to the surrounding areas as cause b the current use o the ',vier Additionally. as mentioned above, given the change in use of the rerty from purely commercial to residential use, by its very nature water quality will be improved because the acili will release less ,olluted water into the sanita and likel storm sewer s stem. Together these elements of the Laurel Pondsedeve opm r r o ect dery ns r� the wide varie o environmental im•rovements that will result om this i ro'ect. 47. If yes, what is the positive environmental infrastructure associated with this project? Attach excerpts from an environmental authority such as the MPCA, environmental engineers, etc. that indicate the positive impact of these environmental developments. See footnotes below. 3 48. Does the project advance or promote the growth of the green economy as defined in Minn. Stat 11 J 437 (see` '°u °�, nll�l �r.II� and enter the statute nt bem• IIII !i�,� ��illl Bulli IL I g1,IBf"0'...,a VIII 11�r;llll.,II����„,''�” Ilu,,.,�''NIU�,1, �uumuuuuummuuuuuui II uuuuuum muumuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuVVuuuuuuuuuuuuu uumi uuuuuuuuum mumuuuuuuuuuum,uu muu,mmuuu�lll oA�uuuuuuuuu uuuul m i�iuuuuu a uuuum iuuuuuuumluu� r)? If yes,please describe. The_project will promote the growth of the Green Economy in Minnesota in many and varied wa s. First the new buildin.s will be built in a wa that will be enerA and resource efficient. Currently, the_developer is investigating the use and feasibility of using renewable enerm or bui din. utilities in the ture. Xcel Enert4 through its investment in Renewable Energy Sources has given users, such_as this building, the option of using per generated with renewable sources or e .erm use into the tune. The leve o'er believes that i these o'tions are economical) and iracticall viable there is no reason wh the buildin' cannot become a user o renewable erred thus supporting additional production of the same c nd assisting Xcel and the State of Mir n soca in achieving the goals oft one _ e energy standard.in e_&tur . Second the new and innovative_insulation, mechanical and lighting systems envisioned for use at the •ro•er will direct) lead to i sistance in achieving the statewide er er .-savira*s !oal �uuuw,IuIIuLw�I I����III�i bIII I iIIII�II II III11,1111tlll III 11411, 1"1,,,,"' III III IIII"'l I�,I�V I Iillollllii ll IIIIII II�IIiIIII1 Lu...e....i.I. I I III IIIIi�u�IIII1 I����I��I �1111111,1a"',111 II li��i�bi�llII I llIIi I"h I I 111 I 19 IIIIIIIIlu� I��.�IIIbIllI lIIIII llIIoIo0000000000illllIlIioo.ooIIII l.o.III 000000000�o��oi�000000ii I � �ulI 9.�.elII IIIIIllllIlIe,l� bIi 9���lllI1l��SbIIm �lII e�ll� 111lII lIbo.. ll I IIIII,.I1�lu�bllbm�. ll�ll�lll,11 ll�e, I16�eibl6I��V,01,,414,11,,,"'��.., II66eII ,1,1,111,11„10111'1111,1!i. .�i.� IIIIII�.�lII1I����II llIIIi IIIIII11 II,...IIIIIII IIVI Illeilbu�I11IIIIit IIe II�,, II,JI 6 ,III 1III�mAS�I ll,I i I �..i.11iIIIIII I IIIIl llIlII�I.�lllli II1l l li I�IlllII�ell��IIIIII II� III IIIIIIII i IIIi.�.III� 111,4 a..ii.III lI II1IIIII uo IIIImII i II IIIIi IIIII I,mi III III 111»...... ........ ... 11 I b,,111 IIA� 11i111111,101IdI 111 111u19 11Io p.�1011,ie IIIh'11190llll I I1 1 01 II1 III IS IuoI I!11I,II1w�0IVyi 11II I 1 1i��,�1111i 11111 VIII �t�... t,.i�r r.� t/ ror� t. .,e/l �..., I i 1 /,///1l dfr// .!/ if..��t.ii rll%!�c/ ,(�/// � lJ1Jl� �✓/ elf/ A t ,�f..//l. ,t /,ll 0//�«r r F.,ii iii ...._nut/i�,�. 1r �/ i r.,r, i✓/i���l��._,f0ll�i»,Rm♦i,�/�1�,�tid(wirr,�'�%i r.%«wJ✓/frrrt�l��ll�N�cii�,�u�C t�lr/r/,f�,,,J1.mr�!r�/dJllllb✓,iJ�/��r�t/r�,l,lr)�i�!!�i/fi�.J tri//_��flrll.�,Iit,,i,i�,1/ ,ii/i/��///il/t �„i��^,�r,r�., ,,yi �k,%//ii�t��r,ll„i �1,� � .N/�(/.l Ili' /�/I�JJ/////clffll!%,«d,rl(((%G,f"N/,////�/i 1 9G../���U _alb,�n,rFm� Redevelopment Page 15 112211.v FY 1 because of sim e advances in technology. The buildings on the site currently use old technology fpowei.dstribution. heainanc h . The develo i er will t to work with a local manu acturer and producer o low ener use LEDlightingfor the_profectcalledzouseUSAofPlymouth to utilize locally manufactured and installed LED lighting. This design element, along with others will also assist the project i its attempt to achieve maximum environmental cost electivenessf iven the re leve o s went nature ofthe pract and the economic constraints on such an effort. Lastly, the Stormwater management systems associated ith- the property will be corn pktel reconstructed updated and im•roved. The s stem to the extent 'ossi le will r rovide � or reuse acrd r�e til atr' rho St r cter� runoff and where this is not eas ble. will provide a close___systemto minimize the contact between storm water and potential sources of contamination. PROXIMITY TO PUBLIC T SIT 49. Attach a local transit schedule, and highlight the lines that serve the project site or surroundi ,, ‘0 49 ors ;4_, 'al 0 :15 oz 12. ire' e.8 0 0 6 > s'-' et 0 > > w ..9 .:4 -•m , __,... , -- "8 '4 . r's - '- -- 4 m 1:' 0 0 bi) ,-4 Z ci, ce ,__, .5 4- .r.5. ,v, >, 6 . kc' . ______ . . . 1 1 [ i-cl -8 0 iz 1 s ir) Pizi ca) 441 -4 E., 'N .,EI '>- .i.., .• g 6, .- o r,:, A ,-. ) 6 E `'- „S 63 1 E 1. a P.42 0 k, r x 4e .s '1' : 51 I.it T'7 i 1 t 0 +.2 la , H ,.., . ,g 4., it s .hi, , xl = 0 q-, 0 1 14 i� --rici , . J1 0x 4.) — 0 12., CL) . 4? 8 ! ; X Cl/ i tl.> 4 • 8 E 1 (,,, x 0=1 w , . ci.ii.6's x iv 6 ..e, :=-1 ''.). T. Igili< 1- ' _________.. __, g VizI V.,11 ' - --- i-h4 ,,,,R 'S 6 ;=, :.: a ix rs0 -. cu 7)( 4,0., IPO 6 0 ›. CD A_____ x 5'5 0 0 ie , ,.., I x af, pizH,-, 81 .72 i cs , pi w 6 co , x x w ' ' 6 goiliS rA ° Ert C a x O I— biri iS E ,r8 114 X X Ola I ' X X X x 5 2 °.) cn ° a e 2 _ ' El ° H . x o E 0 ,, F = < ,,, < X X 1 .x 4 r x x x H 0 0 '� PI "Cl 0 ,-,9 0 0 .2 .0 g , x x ix x x x x ._.0 If I) 0 " gr. VO 04 ›- L „, 0 g — .;,z Cli) , —, X I X X , X , X !-EL, EIH M.i ° a) rcl i:4 0 0 U) X wi r8 .. ) t.1 :4 i EI =9 1- JU zi m wi c..) 0 .4-' --- . c c c c 0 4> i,.., 4:1 eg § I , . 4,4 rt, cri .r) ta„,{1.) ._,,,, = D R a) A E 2. Lo .1.3 2 cl) ' :4- E > 'EL-2 ...--.,, , cd ..„ g -9 .-, - p . . E T, E E cil co cl- , = 1.5 c - 0 a, K CO t. 6 >, a > t w PE -2 gi gl .S. c r° 8 2' 5 gi • r ca t X a o 4) , ..., co 0 i, 7 u „ •0 2 -En F 0 ao 0 -1-' cp cp %.., (0 I.< 2 2 1-6 < < 7., u)!2 ti.i., w sz „,..co >. 2 ,, _,0 2 -I!A ”Q-.1) H Er a A , 0 „au) F..... 5 "A c i% -0 „,,,-- is V w.-13 C 19 - cg 5,C 2 0 0 (9 0 ,I, C.) t C C° 03 c 5 C " -MERE Ev c • 0, z a) a) a) .0c = ' (Ni .., Ith - -c,'ion0 •c 2 ° ,� it � r Io O O1 i l D %I 0 p!I 0 cri 4.g 4.1 0 O'r 11 �I l' N l 11 l l l' l' 11 01 QI 4, 4.1 7 o i i L 0 53. Please list any factors which would change or delay this schedule. Failure to secure grant funding could severely affect the schedule of development activities because alternatives or nancin. o the #a, created would be re,aired Additionall the schedule can e av ec by e r e , c s oa ari l a minis t y _a s beyond the control foj he_developer such as government shutdowns, changes in regulation and the inability for ecessary approvals to be obtained. VI. PAYMENT INFORMATION Most grant payments take place through electronic funds transfer(EFT). To ensure proper payment, a Vendor Number assigned by Minnesota Management &Budget is required. Financial Contact Person: Sue Virnig, Finance Director, City of Golden Valley. Telephone Number or e-mail: X763) 593-8010. State of Minnesota Vendor Number: 8774702. If a Minnesota Vendor Number does not exist,please supply: Minnesota esota Identification Number:N/A. and Federal Employer Identification Number: N/A. State Vendor info may be found at: '� ul"� D•i,^� ii 4,.1NP',,. �.,, p..u.a. II ii I�'i _gym i �"', a a,. \, .r, i vl i u�IIIIIQirli ,,,�� 7V �' h 'plpl P I ,,, 1I(� �� „nII1I gyp.16tN ■ �� ryI �h pp\yp 'p p �p l� up��0�� ,- r I����,„I\I'.I u i�J ..�I�.�'Il���il�� ua��i �r v''I� l�N,mu� ��IM�I��H IY�IUV"^� 'M„I�V��yA�^V �Ilio I���uIRI�� tlV�lllll�`It�' �V� �� m,,N'I" ^ V " i,.�� � Ir ��,��IIgI..��. u��p�� i ii�I Il,unin �1N�qItl'.. I �VNI �V �, � Vendor number conversions from the old system to the new SWIFT may be found at: Ltt,,,,,��I ��Ili��nl illi�l'IuIP"ul�p��y ISI �,p�a „Iti,. ill rll�V�IItVIIo� VIu�� �.IN qi V�I�. Ilru„n.vxn,xn v ;moo-o oN i i^� �is„„ .„ ,,., ,n^"ei iaoowu,ohu+on,,xH xn xn uwN,mmirnw VII. L o CAIS GOVERNMENT RESOLUTION You must attach a resolution approving this application and committing the local match from the governing body of the municipali Exhibit "A" Current appraised or assessed value of the site 1111.v Exhibit"B" Projected appraised or assessed value after the redevelopment activities have been completed (prior to development) 112211.v Exhibit"C" Site and location map 112211.v Exhibit"D" Current and historic photographs the site 112211.v Exhibit"E" Synopsis on the history and general background of the site The site includes two adjacent properties: 305 and 345 Pennsylvania Avenue South, Golden Valley,Minnesota 55426. Prior to 1959, 345 Pennsylvania Avenue was used for agricultural purposes. Mark Hurd Aerial Survey, Inc. ("Mark Hurd") constructed a building on the property in 1959 and occupied the building until 1990. As part of their normal business operations, Mark Hurd would discharge film-developing chemicals to the sanitary sewer under an industrial waste discharge permit. In the lower level of the building, a floor trench, several connecting floor drains, and a sump vault collected waste liquids prior to discharging to the sanitary sewer. The floor trench, connections and floor drains were cleaned and inspected and determined to be in poor condition, but were filled with concrete prior to subsurface evaluation. A Phase II investigation was conducted at the site by B.A. Liesch &Associates in 1997. Five borings were attempted and four were completed along the former drain system. Soil samples were obtained and evaluated. The 1997 Phase II report dated June 13, 1997, indicated soil screening levels and soil reference values were not exceeded; however, in November 1999 a new measure of soil quality, soil leaching value, was created and the 1997 data indicated an excess concentration of silver. Ultimately, it was determined that no significant impact to the environment had occurred from previous land use on the property and recommended that the site be eligible for a"No Further Action"assurance letter from the MCA Voluntary Investigation and Cleanup Program. Between 1990 and 1994, the building was vacant. From 1994 to 2000, United Pharmacy Associates, a company specializing in the packaging and delivery of medications to nursing homes, occupied the building. In 1997, Extendicare Health Services, Inc. ("Extendicare") acquired the site from Mark Hurd. In September 1999, Badger Acquisition of Minnesota LLC ("Badger") acquired the site from Extendicare as part of a larger business acquisition. In 2001, following a period of vacancy, the property was acquired by Speak the Word International. Speak the Word International currently uses the two-story brick building for various church related business, including the operation of a video production company. There are also two parking lots south of the brick building. 305 Pennsylvania Avenue is currently owned by Adam James Hiler (likely purchased in December 2011) and is occupied by a single family dwelling along with a detached garage. The 1,318 square foot dwelling was originally constructed in 1910 and renovated in 1940. All buildings on the site are currently in operable condition and comply with all regulations except for sewage problems beneath the commercial building. All buildings currently occupying the site will be demolished prior to development. Twenty-four residential structures shall be constructed upon the two properties pursuant to a community housing plan. 112211.v5 Exhibit"F" Detailed narrative of the proposed new development plan for the site Laurel Pondswi Exhibit"G" Public Transportation Servicing Laurel Pond Metro Transit Routes: 9 604 643 649 652 663 672 675 705 756 112211.v5 Exhibit"H" Local Government Resolution 112211.v5 Resolution 15-10 January 20, 2015 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SUBMITTAL OF AN APPLICATION TO THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT REDEVELOPMENT GRANT PROGRAM WHEREAS the City of Golden Valley agrees to act as the legal sponsor for the project contained in the Redevelopment Grant Program to be submitted by February 1, 2015, and that Physical Development Director is hereby authorized to apply to the Department of Employment and Economic Development for funding of this project on behalf of the City of Golden Valley on behalf of the Laurel Ponds Project; and WHEREAS that the City of Golden Valley has the legal authority to apply for financial assistance, and the institutional, managerial, and financial capability to ensure adequate project administration; and WHEREAS that the sources and amounts of the local match identified in the application are committed to the project identified; and WHEREAS that the City of Golden Valley has not violated any Federal, State or local laws pertaining to fraud, bribery, graft, kickbacks, collusion, conflict of interest or other unlawful or corrupt practice; and WHEREAS that if the project identified in the application fails to substantially provide the public benefits listed in the application within five years from the date of the grant award, the City of Golden Valley may be required to repay 100 percent of the awarded grant per Minn. Stat. § 116J.575 Subd. 4; and WHEREAS that upon approval of its application by the state, the City of Golden Valley may enter into an agreement with the State of Minnesota for the above referenced project, and that the City of Golden Valley certifies that it will comply with all applicable laws and regulation as stated in all contract agreements. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Mayor and the City Clerk of the City of Golden Valley are hereby authorized to execute such agreements as are necessary to implement the project on behalf of the applicant. Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by the City Clerk. c tv U D111J . .w: valley Planning Department 763-593-8095/763-593-8109 (fax) . ,. Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting January 20, 2015 60 day deadline:January 20, 2015 Agenda Item 4. A. Public Hearing - Approval of Conditional Use Permit #39, Amendment #1 - 5501 Glenwood Avenue - Golden Valley Lutheran Church dba Loving Shepherd Early Learning Center, Applicant Prepared By Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager Summary Golden Valley Lutheran Church dba Loving Shepherd Early Learning Center is proposing to amend their existing Conditional Use Permit (CUP) allowing for a child day-care facility in an 1-1 Institutional zoning district at 5501 Glenwood Avenue. This property is zoned 1-1 Institutional and guided for Schools and Religious Facilities use. The Applicant has operated a day-care facility on the property since 1989, when the CUP was first approved. Initially, many of the day-care operations were conducted in a stand-alone building separate from the church. Last year the church constructed an addition, demolished the stand- alone building, and consolidated the day-care operations. The current CUP limits the total number of children served to 50. Previous evaluation of the use in 1989 found it to be appropriate and consistent with the policies of the City. At this time the only significant change is an increase in the number of children served. The Department of Human Services and the City's Fire Department have indicated that 105 children is an appropriate number to be served at this location in these facilities. At the December 22, 2014, Planning Commission meeting the Commission voted 7-0 to recommend approval of the proposal. Specifically, the Commission felt the proposed use was in compliance with the ten factors in the City Code that determine the eligibility of a conditional use, subject to the following conditions: 1. The plans by submitted by the Applicant on November 21, 2014, shall become a part of this approval. 2. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from Fire Chief John Crelly to Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager, dated December 16, 2014, shall become part of this approval. 3. All signage must meet the requirements of the City's Sign Code (Section 4.20). 4. This approval is subject to all other state, federal, and local ordinances, regulations, or laws with authority over this development. Attachments • Location Map (1 page) • Unapproved Planning Commission minutes dated December 22, 2014 (4 pages) • Memo to the Planning Commission dated December 22, 2015 (2 pages) • Memo from Fire Chief John Crelly dated December 16, 2014 (1 page) • Applicant's Narrative (2 pages) • Exterior Plan (1 page) • Floor Plan (1 page) • Ordinance #539 (2 pages) Recommended Action Motion to adopt Ordinance #539, Approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 39, Amendment #1, 5501 Glenwood Avenue, Golden Valley Lutheran Church dba Loving Shepherd Early Learning Center, Applicant. i Turners Pori! 'x �.....�_'-.._ ., 5430 -- Subject Property 5430 1 ... -�_. �..... 5400 5 5635 Sut 57015705 • 5423 5415 5405 5601 5747 5317 5301 5 9 15 17 57;5. h 30 �.�. 5743 '1 .. 7 10 1213 1 8 9 212 2.2.:2(201 lurnNik•Rx i 25 40 1 33Si yr 7 to 12 '� 208 los 20¢ 4 100 1.57: ; 8) 11 101 104 10 109 108 {1 7_8.3 12 [. _ _ 109 112 1 117 116 eue1i t i 101 —. 117 329 ' '3O/O1 250 201 200 200 1, 328 324 31303 301 201 208 —2-1-0 • (f 315 216 209 220 319 308 •, 310 3012 327 333 _ 400 ; 400 Regular Meeting of the Golden Valley Planning Commission December 22, 2014 gular meeting of the Planning Co mission was held at the Golden Valley City Hall, CouatiL,Qhambers, 7800 Golden Vail Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota, on Monday, December 2014. Chair Kluchka ca ed the meeting to ordwOr7 pm. Those present were ning Commis ioners B Blum, Cera, Johnson, Kluchka, Segelbaum and Waldhaus Iso pre ent lanning Manager Jason Zimmerman, Associate Planner/Grant Writer Iner, and Administrative Assistant Lisa Wittman. 1. Approval of Min s Novemb 4, 2014, Regular PI nning Commission Me Dec er 8, 2014, Regular Pla ning Commission Meeting MO by Waldhauser, seconded by ohnson and motion carried unanimously to rove the November 24, 2014, and ecember 8, 2014, minutes as submitted. 2. Informal Public Hearing — Conditional Use Permit— 5501 Glenwood Avenue — Golden Valley Lutheran Church dba Loving Shepherd Early Learning Center — CU-39, Amendment #1 Applicant: Golden Valley Lutheran Church dba Loving Shepherd Early Learning Center Address: 5501 Glenwood Avenue Purpose: To amend and update their existing Conditional Use Permit allowing the existing daycare to serve up to 105 children. Zimmerman explained the Applicant's request to amend their existing Conditional Use Permit in order to increase the number of children they can serve. The original Conditional Use Permit, approved in 1989, limits the number of children served to 50. He stated that the Applicant constructed a significant building addition in 2014, which created more space for the daycare facility, and allows the site to serve up to 105 children. However, the applicant anticipates their enrollment to be approximately 75 children in 2015. Kluchka asked for clarification regarding the number of trips per day for this site. Zimmerman referred to a site plan and noted that there are two access points on the site. He stated that each child would generate two trips per day and that the Applicant could explain the timing of the trips, He added that there are approximately 8,000 trips per day on Glenwood and that this use would have a fairly small impact. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission December 22, 2014 Page 2 Cera stated that the access point on Turners Crossroad is usually gated. Ken Mestelle, representing Golden Valley Lutheran Church, stated that the gate on Turners Crossroad is open on Sundays, and that the majority of the daycare traffic enters on Glenwood Avenue. Waldhauser asked why the City cares about limiting the number of children as long as a daycare is licensed through the State. Segelbaum stated that the City considers traffic issues and how the surrounding area may be impacted. Zimmerman agreed that noise, traffic, etc. would be potential reasons to regulate a daycare use. Johnson stated that the Board of Zoning appeals granted a variance for the recent building addition and asked why the issue regarding the number of children in the daycare didn't get addressed at that time. Zimmerman stated that the variance request was in regard to the building and that the daycare is in regard to the use. He added that the two issues are reviewed by two different bodies and that the Applicant wasn't aware of the limits on their daycare at the time they applied for the variance. Brenda Lovhaug, Director of Loving Shepherd Early Learning Center, stated that she came to City Hall to pick up her final building permit paperwork regarding the addition and was told she needed to update their Conditional Use Permit. Segelbaum asked for an explanation of the drop-off and pick-up route through the parking lot. Mestelle stated that cars come in from Glenwood, park in a parking stall and unload their children. He added that parents don't line up to drop their kids off at the front door because the kids are infants and toddlers, not school-aged kids. Segelbaum asked Mestelle if he is concerned about the increase in traffic and conflicts it may cause in their driveway. Mestelle said there has never been an issue with traffic. He added that Glenwood Avenue is wider in front of their driveway for the left turn lane onto Xenia so that also helps with traffic flow. Segelbaum asked if the left turn lane is marked. Mestelle said no. Baker asked the Applicants if they are mindful of the timing with Meadowbrook School's hours. Lovhaug said their morning drop-offs occur between 7 and 8:30 am and that Meadowbrook starts one hour later. She added that Meadowbrook is done at 3 pm and that most of her daycare parents pick up their children at 5:30 pm, so there hasn't been a conflict. Kluchka opened the public hearing. Seeing and hearing no one wishing to comment, Kluchka closed the public hearing. Cera stated that this is a straightforward proposal, the Applicant is a good neighbor, and they have added plenty of space to accommodate their daycare use. He suggesting changing the City's ordinances to match the State ordinances regarding daycare uses. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission December 22, 2014 Page 3 Segelbaum said he is a little concerned about not having the entrance/exit lines painted on the driveway. Kluchka asked Zimmerman if there have been any concerns expressed about access or traffic on Glenwood. Zimmerman said he hasn't heard any complaints but he would check with the Police Department and the Public Works Department. Baker said he is concerned about people going west on Glenwood. Mestelle reiterated that there have been no traffic problems in their parking lot or on Glenwood. Baker said he would like feedback before this proposal goes to the City Council because he doesn't know if traffic is an issue or not. Cera suggested requiring striping in the driveway. Kluchka stated that Staff has not recommend striping, he just wants to make sure it is not an issue. Waldhauser said she thinks a traffic issue would be much more obvious on Sundays. Segelbaum said that Glenwood is not as busy on Sundays as it is on weekdays. Baker suggested that the Applicant be mindful of striping if the need arises. Mestelle said he really doesn't think there will be any issues because their daycare numbers have increased since their original Conditional Use Permit was granted. MOVED by Waldhauser, seconded by Baker and motion carried unanimously to recommend approval of the Conditional Use Permit Amendment at 5501 Glenwood Avenue to allow the existing daycare to serve up to 105 children subject to following findings and conditions: Findings: 1. The Golden Valley Lutheran Church has successfully operated the existing day- care in this location since the CUP was initially approved in 1989. 2. A child day-care use in association with a church is consistent with the Schools and Religious Facilities designation of this property on the General Land Use Plan Map. 3. Staff anticipates the continuation of this use would have no impact on the surrounding property values. 4. 2013 Hennepin County traffic counts on this section of Glenwood Avenue show approximately 8,500 trips per day. Staff does not anticipate any additional negative traffic impacts to the surrounding areas based on the small number of additional trips generated by this amended use. 5. The amended use may generate a minor increase in the number of employees at the location. 6. The amended use may result in a slight increase in noise as a result of more children using the outdoor play area, but any increase is anticipated to have minimal impact. 7. The amended use is not anticipated to cause an increase in dust, odor, or vibrations. 8. The amended use is not anticipated to attract pests. 9. Because the amended use has already been relocated into the new building addition, Staff does not anticipate any negative impacts on in the visual quality of the property. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission December 22, 2014 Page 4 10. Staff does not anticipate any other negative effects of the amended use. Bringing the use into the church building will allow for consolidation and increased efficiencies on the property. Conditions: 1. The plans by submitted by the Applicant on November 21, 2014, shall become a part of this approval. 2. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from Fire Chief John Crelly to Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager, dated December 16, 2014, shall become part of this approval. 3. All signage must meet the requirements of the City's Sign Code (Section 4.20). 4. This approval is subject to all other state, federal, and local ordinances, regulations, or laws with authority over this development. Informal Public Hearing — Infor al Public Hearing — Final PUD Plan Review — Laurel Ponds, PUD #117 plicant: Lake West Develop ent, LLC Add ss: 305 and 345 Penns vania Avenue South Purpose: To allow for a 24-un detached townhome develop ent Zimmerman explain e the Applicant's oposal to demolish th xisting structures at 305 and 345 Pennsylvania enue South a d construct 24 de, ed townhomes on the site. He discussed the modification from the P liminary PUQ ans including: the reduction in the number of units from 30 to 2 , keeping he draina , open space and walkway easement 55 feet wide instead of reducing it,� nd re ' signi . -` he internal street, Laurel Point, to align with Quebec Avenue South. Zimmerman referred to a site plan a xplained the proposed layout which includes six rows of homes with four single favi ly h s in each row, accessed via Pennsylvania Avenue. There will be one pri..a e stre (La el Point) to the south that would dead end with emergency vehicle access , er grass avers �' the WorkAbilities property. The two entry points to the north woul 'e connecte with a pr to loop street (Laurel Curve), and all but two homes would hav. access from th, internal cilation system; the others would have access via Pennsy�'ania Avenue. He tated that the , t widths and depths will vary from 36 feet to 53 feet in idth, and from 80 fe t to 100 feet in th. The typical distance between the homes wo Fd be 10 feet to the sid and 25 feet to the ar, and the homes could potentially Xve 4,144 to 6,286 squar feet of living area. H' dded that there will be a homeowis association for mainten nce and snow removal. Zim 'rman showed the Commissio rs a comparison chart that i strates how this pr I, osed PUD differs from the unde ying R-3 Zoning District requirements. He explained t the areas in which they differ ar lot width, and front, side and rear yard setback requirements. i city of' old en MEMORANDUM g Department Plannin valley P 763-593-8095/763-593-8109(fax) Date: December 22, 2014 To: Golden Valley Planning Commission From: Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager Subject: Informal Public Hearing- Amend Conditional Use Permit (CUP-39) Allowing for a Child Day-Care Facility in an 1-1 Institutional Zoning District - 5501 Glenwood Avenue - Golden Valley Lutheran Church dba Loving Shepherd Early Learning Center, Applicant Background and Proposed Use Golden Valley Lutheran Church dba Loving Shepherd Early Learning Center is proposing to amend their existing Conditional Use Permit (CUP) allowing for a child day-care facility in an 1-1 Institutional zoning district at 5501 Glenwood Avenue. This property is zoned 1-1 Institutional and guided for Schools and Religious Facilities use. The subject property is bounded by Glenwood Avenue to the north with access to Turners Crossroad/Turnpike Road to the southeast. There are multi-family uses to the west and south. The Applicant has operated a day-care facility on the property since 1989, when the CUP was first approved. Initially, many of the day-care operations were conducted in a stand-alone building separate from the church. Last year the church constructed an addition, demolished the stand- alone building, and consolidated the day-care operations. The Department of Human Services has issued a license that allows the Applicant to provide care up to a maximum of 105 children in the new facilities and provides a break-down of the number of infants and toddlers, as well as preschool and school age children, to be served. The current CUP limits the total number of children served to 50. Previous evaluation of the use in 1989 found it to be appropriate and consistent with the policies of the City. At this time the only significant change is an increase in the number of children served. The Department of Human Services and the City's Fire Department have indicated that 105 children is an appropriate number to be served at this location in these facilities. Evaluation The findings and recommendations for a Conditional Use Permit are based upon any or all of the following factors: 1. Demonstrated Need for the Proposed Use: The Golden Valley Lutheran Church has successfully operated the existing day-care in this location since the CUP was initially approved in 1989. 2. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan: A child day-care use in association with a church is consistent with the Schools and Religious Facilities designation of this property on the General Land Use Plan Map. 3. Effect on Property Values: Staff anticipates the continuation of this use would have no impact on the surrounding property values. 4. Effect on Traffic: 2013 Hennepin County traffic counts on this section of Glenwood Avenue show approximately 8,500 trips per day. Staff does not anticipate any additional negative traffic impacts to the surrounding areas based on the small number of additional trips generated by this amended use. 5. Effect of Increases in Population and Density:The amended use may generate a minor increase in the number of employees at the location. 6. Increase in Noise Levels: The amended use may result in a slight increase in noise as a result of more children using the outdoor play area, but any increase is anticipated to have minimal impact. 7. Impact of Dust, Odor, or Vibration: The amended use is not anticipated to cause an increase in dust, odor, or vibrations. 8. Impact of Pests: The amended use is not anticipated to attract pests. 9. Visual Impact: Because the amended use has already been relocated into the new building addition, Staff does not anticipate any negative impacts on in the visual quality of the property. 10. Other Impacts to the City and Residents: Staff does not anticipate any other negative effects of the amended use. Bringing the use into the church building will allow for consolidation and increased efficiencies on the property. Recommended Action Staff recommends approval of amended Conditional Use Permit 39 allowing for a child day-care facility in an 1-1 Institutional Zoning District at 5501 Glenwood Avenue. The approval of a Conditional Use Permit is subject to the following conditions: 1. The plans by submitted by the Applicant on November 21, 2014, shall become a part of this approval. 2. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from Fire Chief John Crelly to Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager, dated December 16, 2014, shall become part of this approval. 3. All signage must meet the requirements of the City's Sign Code (Section 4.20). 4. This approval is subject to all other state, federal, and local ordinances, regulations, or laws with authority over this development. Attachments Location Map (1 page) Applicant's Narrative (2 pages) Memo from Fire Chief John Crelly dated December 16, 2014 (1 page) Exterior Plan (1 page) Floor Plan (1 page) v+ry Fire Department 763-593-8079/763-593-8098 (fax) Date: December 16, 2014 To: Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager From: John Crelly, Fire Chief Subject: CUP—39, Amendment#1, Golden Valley Lutheran Day Care—5501 Glenwood Avenue I have reviewed the conditional use permit information for Golden Valley Lutheran Day Care located at 5501 Glenwood Avenue. This building was recently expanded to specifically provide space, under one roof to accommodate both the Church's and Daycare Center needs. The building is classified as a Group "A-3", B (as Accessory per Minnesota State Building Code (SBC) section 508.3.3), E (per SBC section 308.5.2) occupancy, The proposed use of this tenant space as a licensed day care to accommodate a maximum number of 105 children (GVLC letter dated November 19, 2014) is consistent with the occupancy requirements of the Minnesota State Fire Code. Also, the applicant is obligated to comply with the Department of Human Services to maintain a compliant balance of infants, toddlers and prekindergarten age children. The proposed limit of 105 children is acceptable. If you have any questions, please contact me at 763-593-8065, or my e-mail address, jcrellyCcDgoldenvalleymn.gov Golden Valley Lutheran Church Journeying as a community in Christ... touching lives with His love November 19, 2014 To Whom It May Concern, Golden Valley Lutheran Church is requesting to update and amend its current Conditional Use permit from 1989 so that it may continue to meet the needs of families in the area. We have taken great effort to operate a quality Christian child care center/early learning center. We are accredited by two national organizations; National Lutheran School Accreditation and National Association for the Education of Young Children. Over the past twenty five years, the number of children that we have been able to care for has increased as we have made adjustments to the use of our physical space to accommodate a growing need. Each incremental adjustment was completed over many years with the annual approval by the Department of Human Services. Our program is well regarded and continues to receive the highest ratings from Minnesota Parent Aware. Our efforts to continue building on our success required us to evaluate the longevity of one of our buildings. After careful evaluation and consideration, we moved forward with a city approved project that allowed us to more effectively operate under a single roof. A current map showing our location, site and building plan remain on file with the city of Golden Valley. We are currently licensed by the Department of Human Services to provide care for a maximum number of 105 children which will break down to 65 infants (ages 6 weeks through 16 months) and toddlers (ages 16 months through 33 months) not to exceed 28 infants, and 40 preschool (33 months through 5 years) and school age children. Our hours of operation are 7:00 AM to 6:00 PM Monday through Friday year round. Caring for this number of children requires us to employ a minimum of 27 staff members which includes a director, cook and custodian. The ratio of staff to children is 1:4 for infants, 1:7 for toddlers and 1:10 for preschoolers/school age. The staff members of Golden Valley Lutheran Church are not included in this number. We operate a kitchen which is licensed through Hennepin County Health Department and provide breakfast, lunch and an afternoon snack each day. Parents continue to drop off and pick up each day by parking in the main parking lot and entering and exiting the building through the main doors of the church. Within the church building we have installed a security system which does not allow access to the seven early learning center rooms unless you have a code to enter through the security doors. The large investment in both physical space and human capital allows us to fulfill the mission of our church to reach out to our community and share the gospel. 5501 Glenwood Ave. - Golden Valley . MN . 55422-5070 763.544.2810 • www.gvIc.net The west side of the church building we have a fenced in playground which is divided into three separate play areas; infants, toddlers and preschoolers. This play area was upgraded with new grading and equipment during our 2014 construction project. The building plan shows the continued use of 3 existing rooms one which was remodeled due to the addition being attached to the building at that location. It also shows 4 new classrooms. The remodeled room and the new classrooms all have doors that exit onto the playground. Our ability to provide a safe environment for our children is well documented and the request to amend a dated city document pertaining to the number of children that our church can serve should be approved. We believe it is a reasonable request to remove the 50 child limit restriction from the conditional use permit or at least update it to reflect the 105 children the Department of Human Services has licensed our new facility to operate under. We seek to work with the city so that we may continue to operate under newly amended terms of the permit and continue to serve the many families that so heavily rely on our services. Thank you. We look forward to finalizing this important detail with the city of Golden Valley. Sincerely, Brenda Lovhaug Ken Mestelle Director Building Committee Chair GLENWp pD GL ENWOOD AVENUE AVEN UE ar- -v—�'r°'-n MIA �z,- I r r T-w _ rw ear. r ._ n•ev esev °° - � aAF 041 o-1 My1 WW W 1 0 ��Oart r' W o Om e W W87- Ilk, ry _ [wry C p a W\ 1! ni' W �I - I eek— Io w jo r - O a b ; �. ` ' a ko o! NINETEEN :O EXISTING BUILDING O C� EXISTING BUILDING �S" I - W I achiteaft-kloofp=ftd 2001 UNIVERSITY 4L (� O AVENUE SOUTHEAST A.Tav I RISEI6 v / SURE 100 r _ _ r / 3 r 1 j- `•' G GO I vm / I MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55414 t YJ �•' 3 ° /T PHONE(612 623.1800 cE I ct N (a._� sEt wror.slrt R.w --t• wTq, � FAX(fi12)l;23.0012 r I /X FAoB�cM'rrcrc IAY�"GR -e 81.4A5 �rJm u�A ��, I o i I - F . s �� {s '�-^� .•+'a ' PROPOSED ION ... �K<�'° I a B ADDITION O < A =871.03 ON Rehder&.4s3Dczafes Inc w861- I I R-sa° ss 1.' re rt eL ns .., o I PRY W i '__V"" ��r{7`" ® f //.U3 4 _ _ I � OI em•r 2-�� � O nn-.,..w un nrn s.,r.. CD kf� ,•, [ et -- ___— _______ i O ,•.R.1.6T 8 Ibt0.0o' S.Oa' ,sad t°"o' ne<rW wr18Y MNthls pl<n. o O ---- OI ® �: t°q° 3I -. R eh• r� Pfe erviLm<ntl lhalb°m E Q -- -- - 'Gni —� _ RµI9• � � � — I llcensetl PMeubnd Engineer rneer N .4.s• — -------- _ ___ --------- ---- ---- = _ I e£ hNNNESOTA -- -- ---------------- i W I SIGNATURE: �•�� r. I onE ENGINEER: Benton G.Fad.P.E W R I �1:1/� REGISTRATION NUMBER: 24392 n i I i I DATE: 25 SEPTEMBER 2013 O O RAM BY: NPA DEMOLITION PLAN I !� CHECKED BY: BGF C I I—23 PROJECT TRIS GOLDEN VALLEY I LUTHERAN CHURCH DEMOLITION NOTES I „n„, =r p, —Remar<bituml—Pavemen 37 t TURNPIKE ®-Remove orrcrte Pavement ®-R<ma�e aWa fink f.— M I R D GOLDEN VALLEY, 4p-Removal arm rel«oboe of had by 0..' 29 MINNESOTA r Q-Remove 1—and mist.landxaping I Q Project Number 4425 ®-Remove concrete curb and gutter 40, 0 sa°resbtlea mey p-RemoY<hoax I I W Cc CD Remove pi—...deq.;pm<nt W O O (/) par rN. nws (D Remove landscape timbers D E _._._ _._._. _. —. ®-Remove parking stall striPirp —-"`-`-— •— _ h � 6s°Nn mn01'bnn.Yh4tM�n"Wu+FN1Y dp,°al U rdeb0 MtaineeMaoub,4Fnn°lene ant olMr NOTE: SEE ARCHITECTURAL FOR DEMOLITION OF fist.a°wm.m raw awm�.ea a.awrJ EXISTING HOUSE STRUCTURE. N.--ssrt °E SRE PLAN v finest AP, ]a Date Appr Revtslon Notu C1 LEGEND PROPOSED CONCRETE SITE NOTES 8 9r4113 REsuwr Toc". Q PROPOSED STD.OI/IY NIIRIINOt15N Qi _All dimensions between curb'mg ane to radi.Pointe ore to lace of curb. WATERSHED PROPOSED WAVY DUTY BRUMNOUS t ®-NI Gmeneione abutting curbs are to back o/curb. A 1f2.13 'A'ATERSHEDPERMIT PPIIWTON . 8DIIIAARI'/ROW/BlOC1(UNE O-'gl carC an7 gutter on primate property shall be lA.8-612 antes. i%—I. rated. No. Date Issue Nor<s —w— QQ-NI sidewalk shall be as per Detail 9/C2 8:11/C2 aMees othenrlx noted. P4- EXISTING WATERLLNN Qh_NI parking stall striping width is 9.00'anl<.n ath<rwiss nataa. CONSTRUCTION —5—IXISTYIG SANITARY SHYER DOCUMENTS-BP#2 —si—EXWNG STORM SHYER sh.0 rue —c—IXSRNG BURIED CAKE TV DEMOLITION& 0 1s 3a m w SITE DIMENSION PLAN st in Feet C1 pzyD oa. CODE REVIEW SUMMARY NOTE:LINE DENOTESISG zoo6 OCCUPANCY ONLY 1-HOUR RATING AND 20 MIN rl�.F DOORS-FOR CORRIDOR ONLY. EXISTING SHOWN GREY I .BMI —RKP.19 GROUP A 3.B(aa Aaevory er5508331.E(pa 53065 2 ERcepSon) EETIN .286-E 3.1783-A-3 13) D33 Oa. 11 C" TWIIa NIIETINIC,ION Q OCCUPANTS OCCUPANTS O SOaa PBS 2-BUILDINGS OF TYPE SB-NONRATED CONSTRUCTION 663 SF 44LD' 33 OCC EEOIIEI® lEOYOOI TM RITE1�NN I(COLUMNS, CO UMNS VERIFY �� P 11 STRUCTURAL FRAME(COLUMNS.GIRDERS.TRUSSES) 0 HR. 0 HR. I D29 ®BO SIE •\ BEARING WALLS-EXTERIOR OHR. 0 N / BEARING WALLS-INTERIOR 0HR. 0 HR. NON-BEARING WALLS AND PARTRIONS-EXTERIOR CHR. UHR. NON-BEARINO WALLS AND PARTITIONS-INTERIOR O HR. 0 HR. CLASSROOM CHOIR REcHEARSAL / 145A FLOOR CONSTRUCTION(INCLUDING SUPPORTING BEAMS AND 101 0HR SHR. CHILDp OLDER ;I 13B 1 $9/SF ` 143 SF ROOF CONSTRUCTION(INCLUDING SUPPORTING BEAMS AND JOTS 0 HR. 0 HR. THAN 2.5 YEARS I YOUTH 282 SF O 29 OCC. T SCB.3.3 NO OCCUPANCY SEPARATION REOUIRED BETWEEN A-3 ANO E a OCC. i 133 SINCE AREAANS LESS THAN I00%O�BUIEDING,+1+RESEOB 3.3ND A-3 PRESCHOOL ;I 7470 uoa. PWAROTEB STATION PRE 37 OCC D TOE FOOENOEB M7NE1K wE EE16E011 tE4L ME®OM RIE EBMAIIOR oOTEIE'Z O126 1 CLASSROOM / HOURs 716 SF 711$F 135 P.A9 FIRE SEPARATION DISTANCE 20 OCC 20 OCC. 291 SIF j' -� -0• HR. NINETEEN SS4 14000. . TEE ALOWANA IOIEIWIT ANE wEnn.AM" 333 STOR A. t3TORY/ADBECI4'WWORSHIP) Archl' M -Incorporated M W ----- ----- ----- SUNDAY NURSERY / F14 BI / BUILDING#1 2001 UNIVERSITY T_ t2B 129 O / 129 SF KC.M AM IIIODPWA�=�JNQ � N NEA 12) AVENUE SOUTHEAST ' 0.30 SF ears.uy AuiAMIAFEYfAlYB. SUITE 100 SAN LIBRARY 12 OCC' MINNEAPOLIS, 30A /•% N.AREA INCREgSEAREA PFACTORRDIIE TO SPRINKLE PROTECTION IN ACCORDANCE W/6.506.3 Y IN ACCORDANCE WTH­ 6000 SF MINNESOTA 55414 L• v v SFC FE EXQ I / _% 623 125A CT 20 Oa 2U Oa 000x4 HALLWAY Ill D 12 0a.a ./• MULTI-STORY ONE-STORY.XXX,NO SPRINKLER ER 300 PHONE FAX 6121)623.0012 0 3)Oa. boa. Z 1z° --EXISTIN RATEDICORRIDOR—� 130 II-q=(-.REASE FACTOR DVE TO FRONTAGE(6.506.2)= 30 ) 123A 67 i yp Oa. _________________I / =lFm-0RIURN p F=PERIMETER F E TER WHICH FRONTS ON A PUBLIC WAY OR OPEN SPACE 5b LF W M N / // W.WIDTH OFNTR EBUILDING 688 LF W=WIDTN OF A PUBLIC WAV OR OPEN SPACE 130MAX) So T / I N.."PHO,mN mla plan. STOR StOR / 412 !'SAN (WI ALTS) MANI 3.630 SF NEW ape�fipa5on,a YOirM 71 5F 71 SF / 2" ReBiafea..A nNr%Aecl unser ue laws _ / SEATS pel.;.lon alw ueI I am a gory SE0 SF z4,3B4 sF TouL 0 of fM afar.m: ILBtl MEOM MINNESOTA TODDLER- i STORAGE KIT1H MENS / EE 11 HA WAY 121 650 SIE / BUILDING#2 O Q 272 SIF / / IECY1 ATEA YOOEKAl10NE-■FNEMM DUN)M M4 re. 657 SF 3 OCC. FE-EX 18 OCC. (LIC.14) 90a. At=TABULAR AREA PER STORY N ACCORDANCE NTH T503 = 5.000 SFI 1 (a.AREA INCREASE FACTOR DUE TO SPRINKLE FROTECTK)N IN ACCORDANCE W/5.506.3 30C MECHANICAL FIRE WALL EXTENDS 30"ABOVE /i MULTI-STORY=%%,ONE-STORY=%X%,NO SPRINKLED=% 19 a 1 ^l 120 ADJOINING ROOF (S7OS.6) if.AREA INCREASE FACTOR OUE TO FRONTAGE(6.50°.2)=BUILDING PEAIMETF 30 ~ l 121 SF i P=PER METER OF ENRRE BUILDING H MONTS ON A PUBLIC WAY OR OPEN SPACE 222 LF n 42)LF WL % FEE% W=WIDTH OF A PUBLIC WAY OR OPEN SPACE I.MAX) 30 I� I I Ta� I.gLT6) Ll�. 5.4696F NEW-OK ARCHITEC 0 TIIOMPSON UL, 1 M H T j ,3S Da,l\ 3I1A�y9�g� ' ///+++ R e F MAX pFGIST °1520 Z FICE ,7 L ne FELLOWSHIP r•' FELLOWSHIP ® / F'© t 1O --• 153 // / WOR� 210 SF DATE: 25 SEPTEMBEP2013 2825 SF 2 OCC. DRAWN BY: ALAI TODDLER-1 _�� laeocc. Dtm T� i PLUMBING REVIEW SUMMARY CHECKED BY AK s a 6280 / 111°; FIRE WALL TO OT.OF DECK W/FIR I TREATED PLYWOOD I 550 SF lac zaa PROJECT TITLE 17 CCC. SHEATHING 4' AC SIDE OF WALL, O OPENINGS W/IN a',MIN. i NOLNOBBVEO a oa. 50CC. OFFICE T29021 (U0.14) HA AY CLASS B ROOF NG (S705.6 EXCEP ION 4) I p GOLDEN VALLEY 1268E "" '"EN'"""E10F'LO "' LUTHERAN CHURCH 106° 27'-9" 1 OCC eszr AJ TOTAL OCC.FOR Ao- r I i LOBBY RECEPTION 763 COG G=391 MEN AND 392 WOMEN ,t7'' ¢ I , 1010 1°9 O TRI 3 MENS WATER CLOSETS REOUIRED=)PROVIDED(3 WATER CLOSETS AND 4 URINALSI / ' I A W ___� I 25363E F (39tns6.3) .-----,--. DC OM6Naza GOLDEN VALLEY L 2 Of' I 1362 Dec.DCC1000. SWOME LAVATORIES REWIRED=S MENS LAVATORIES PROVIDED MINNESOTA O_I.—._ 116 48 EXITRF3 DAILY -. m L Q ____ —�_.----------- --- _.—._.—._. ._. (391Y100.21 L__________________________ � FACEOF Project Number 1426 WATER CLOSETS REWIRED=)WATER CLOSETS PROVIDED PRE-TODDLER p l a—NON-RATED CORRIDOR—► i I �� (392/15=5) a w,aal.r.war.l..a", n4 F w �, 1 COATS I m......, b 3B9 SF E a 1 DAYCARE LOBBY 1392m0-zl ATORIES REOUIREO=S WOMENS LAVATORIES PROVIDED 2 WOMENS LAV w ¢._ 101 00089 t� I I It OCC. - I r'\ Ix f r W I BUILDING #1 r 1UNISE%RESTROOM REWIRED-1 ADULT. CHILD PROVIDED 12 2 \ _____T 1 ______________ l' ------------- --•------------- - J L _._, I�D20a. ; AREA = 24 384 SF E TOTAL OCC FOR E= v N Z BREAK/WORK r f zes occ F I i STORAGE I ASSIST OFF DIR OFF I "AHI"""""""" r lt5')a(I 1.1 j 6WATER CLOSETS REWIRED.!CHILD-2 ADULT PROVIDED .lu Oela App/ RevWon Na[ea 64• 1t0a rL f V 10 OCO I I 129 SF 769 SF I /-\ 1266/50-6) O ` HALL AY 0.�.__ 2153Fr.—.--.+ _.—._ —._ -- _.��) 3E%ISTING UNISEX,1 NEW UNISEX,BGRWP=10 PROVIDED A _I=A — F 2 I \ 4E%\HrrCOCOLUNI INFANT '� I I \\ DR INKING FOUNTAINS RATIO OF 110°0 OCO a AD "-- 2 REWIRED.I M+42REWIRED.I NEW(WTHI-ADA HEIGHT)s 2 EXISTING.3 PROVIDED F �I I LOBBY ��_._._._.-.__-._._ S 2 SF o I ® I\\ 1 SERVICE SINK RE )REO 1 PROVIDED MP VEST'v,o«. I \, \\ --------------- FIRS W ENDS REQUIR -- --13CSVE----------------- / rmG L EXTi \\\ \ ED PROVIDED ADJOIN G ROOF (S7 .6) § MEN 7MEN 5 NFAN 1 HR W LLS W/20 s woMEN )WOMEN 3 MIN OP ING;90 % A A s UIW6XMH%n Cslm t-AWLT) 293 SF MN @ FI WALLS'; 6 / m 6 / aOCC. 7' TOTAL to 19 waxy -10 98 SF _a L VEST. 14-T- L I 209 SF 4 v 2737ff i\ BUI 'DING #2 I ---------------------j---------t-e-2-o`c-----------'i---------------- 4va " CONSTRUCTION AREA = 5,469 S DOCUMENTS -BP#2 CODE + PLAN j -----.'Y znf ufi• �.�._.—.---------.__-------- 11'.11? 2B'-41M Drawing No. SSW VERIFY VEPOY VERIFY FACE OF EXISTNG ACE SHEATHING AND 1 C INTERIOR WALL 6 FACE OF n �O E G J FOUNDATION 2-HR FIRE SEPARATION WALL IT 705.4 FOOTNOTE A) N FIRE WALL TO BOT.OF DECK W/FIRE-TREATED PLYWOOD SHEATHING,NO OPENINGS WAN t ORDINANCE NO. 539, 2ND SERIES AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE Approval of Conditional Use Permit Number 39, Amendment #1 5501 Glenwood Ave. Golden Valley Lutheran Church dba Loving Shepherd Early Learning Center, Applicant The City Council for the City of Golden Valley hereby ordains as follows: Section 1. City Code Chapter 11 entitled "Land Use Regulations (Zoning)" is amended in Section 11.10, Subd. 2, and Section 11.46, by approving a Conditional Use Permit for a certain tract of land at 5501 Glenwood Avenue, thereby allowing a child day- care facility in the 1-1 Institutional Zoning District. This Conditional Use Permit is approved based on the findings of the Planning Commission pursuant to City Code Section 11.80, Subd. 2(G), which findings are hereby adopted and incorporated herein as follows: 1. The Golden Valley Lutheran Church has successfully operated the existing day-care in this location since the CUP was initially approved in 1989. 2. A child day-care use in association with a church is consistent with the Schools and Religious Facilities designation of this property on the General Land Use Plan Map. 3. The continuation of this use would have no impact on the surrounding property values. 4. 2013 Hennepin County traffic counts on this section of Glenwood Avenue show approximately 8,500 trips per day. There are no additional negative traffic impacts anticipated to the surrounding areas based on the small number of additional trips generated by this amended use. 5. The amended use may generate a minor increase in the number of employees at the location. 6. The amended use may result in a slight increase in noise as a result of more children using the outdoor play area, but any increase is anticipated to have minimal impact. 7. The amended use is not anticipated to cause an increase in dust, odor, or vibrations. 8. The amended use is not anticipated to attract pests. 9. Because the amended use has already been relocated into the new building addition, there are no anticipated negative impacts on in the visual quality of the property. This Conditional Use Permit is subject to all of the terms of the permit to be issued including, but not limited to the following specific conditions.. 1. The plans submitted by the Applicant on November 7, 2014, shall become a part of this approval. 2. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from Fire Chief John Crelly to Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager, dated November 26, 2014, shall become part of this approval. 3. All signage must meet the requirements of the City's Sign Code (Section 4.20). 4. This approval is subject to all other state, federal, and local ordinances, regulations, or laws with authority over this development. Section 2. The tract of land affected by this ordinance is legally described as follows: Lot 1, Meadowbrook Acres, the North 202 6/10 feet including adjacent '/2 of vacant road, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Section 3. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Sec. 11.99 entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 4. This ordinance shall take effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law. Adopted by the City Council this 20th day of January, 2015. /s/Shepard M. Harris Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: /s/ Kristine A. Luedke Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk ^ �0��, MEMORANDUM EMANUM =�~ valle / Planning Department 763'593-8095/763-593'8709(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting January 20L 2015 Agenda Item 4. B. Public Hearing ' Ordinance #540 ' Amending Chapter 11: Land Use Regulation (Zoning) regarding addition ofBreweries, Taprooms, and Brevvpubs Prepared By Emily Goe||ner, Associate Planner/Grant Writer Summary Breweries, taprooms, and brevvpubs are a growing trend in the Twin Cities and many communities are beginning toallow these uses. Staff has prepared recommended amendments that modify the Zoning [ode to a||nvv breweries, taprooms, and brexvpubs in Golden Valley. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the following recommendations at an informal public hearing on December 22, 2014. Recommended Definitions Recommended Permitted and Conditional Uses Staff reviewed the feedback from Planning Commission, the intent and purpose of each zoning district, and the zoning ordinances for Minnetonka, Plymouth, St. Louis Park, Brooklyn Center, and Hopkins. From this review, staff recommends adding breweries, taprooms and brewpubs as permitted and conditional uses as indicated below. Recommended Permitted and Conditional Uses Taproom Taproom Brewery <30%floor area >30%floor area Brewpub Light Industrial Permitted Permitted Conditional Industrial Permitted Permitted Conditional Commercial Conditional Mixed-Use Conditional Conditional Conditional Permitted Recommended Off-Street Parking Requirements The off-street parking requirements for similar uses in the City were used to inform the proposed minimum parking requirements for breweries, taprooms, and brewpubs. There are no parking maximum requirements proposed, so business owners could provide more parking if desired. Land Use Similar Land Use Minimum Parking Requirement Brewery Manufacturing 1 space per 500 square feet Taproom Class II Restaurant (fast food) 1 space per 40 square feet Brewpub Class III Restaurant (bar, tavern) 1 space per 60 square feet + 1 space per 25 square feet of bar area Attachments • Memo to Planning Commission dated December 22, 2014 (3 pages) • Unapproved Planning Commission minutes dated December 22, 2014 (4 pages) • Underlined/Overstruck Version of City Code Section 11.03: Definitions (2 pages) • Underlined/Overstruck Version of City Code Section 11.30: Commercial Zoning District (1 page) • Underlined/Overstruck Version of City Code Section 11.35: Light Industrial Zoning District (3 Pages) • Underlined/Overstruck Version of City Code Section 11.47: Mixed Use Zoning District (2 pages) • Underlined/Overstruck Version of City Code Section 11.70: Off-Street Parking and Loading Regulations (2 pages) • Ordinance #540 (2 pages) Recommended Action Motion to adopt Ordinance #540, Amending Section 11.03 Definitions, Section 11.30 Commercial Zoning District, Section 11.35 Light Industrial Zoning District, 11.36 Industrial Zoning District, Section 11.47 Mixed Use Zoning District, and Section 11.70 Off-Street Parking and Loading Regulations regarding Breweries, Taprooms, and Brewpubs. GI tv C .:, Iden MEMORANDUM Planning Department valley g D e P e t 763-593-8095/763-593-8109(fax) Date: December 22, 2014 To: Golden Valley Planning Commission From: Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager Emily Goellner, Associate Planner/Grant Writer Subject: Zoning Code Text Amendment— Breweries, Taprooms, and Brewpubs— Informal Public Hearing Summary Breweries, taprooms, and brewpubs are a growing trend in the Twin Cities and many communities are beginning to allow these uses. Staff has prepared possible amendments to modify the Zoning Code to allow breweries, taprooms, and brewpubs in Golden Valley. Background City Staff discussed options for permitting and regulating breweries, taprooms and brewpubs with the Planning Commission on March 10, 2014. The Commission directed staff to bring a draft of new ordinance language to a future meeting for Planning Commission review. Basics of the 2011 "Surly Bill" • Taprooms (facilities accessory to a brewery where the public can purchase and consume the brewery's beer on site) were authorized under the 2011 "Surly Bill" and require a separate license from the City. • Most taprooms do not offer food but do allow customers to bring in their own food, order food from local delivery companies, or allow for the operation of food trucks. • The brewer is limited to one taproom license under state law. • The brewery can, if permitted by the municipality, operate a restaurant at the brewery. Typically, a brewpub must follow a specified ratio of food to alcohol sales. Recommended Definitions Below are the definitions used in the proposed new ordinance language for each type of facility. These were drafted to incorporate the language used in the state statute, as well as other local cities' zoning codes. Proposed Definitions Brewery An establishment licensed by the City for the manufacture of malt liquors, such as beer and ale, for sale in sealed containers for consumption off the premises. Taproom A facility accessory to a brewery that is licensed by the City for the purchase and consumption of beer made at the brewery. A Class III Restaurant establishment, as defined in this section, that is also licensed Brewpub by the City to brew malt liquor, such as beer or ale, on site for sale and consumption on the premises, or for sale in sealed containers for consumption off the premises. Recommended Permitted and Conditional Uses Staff reviewed the feedback from Planning Commission, the intent and purpose of each zoning district, and the zoning ordinances for Minnetonka, Plymouth, St. Louis Park, Brooklyn Center, and Hopkins. From this review, staff recommends adding breweries, taprooms and brewpubs as permitted and conditional uses as indicated below. Recommended Permitted and Conditional Uses Zoning District Brewery Taproom <25%floor area Brewpub Light Industrial Permitted Permitted Industrial Permitted Permitted Commercial Conditional Mixed-Use Conditional Conditional Permitted Recommended Off-Street Parking Requirements The off-street parking requirements for similar uses in the City were used to inform the proposed minimum parking requirements for breweries, taprooms, and brewpubs. There are no parking maximum requirements proposed, so business owners could provide more parking if desired. A Brewery has parking needs similar to those of a manufacturing facility, which under the City's zoning ordinance requires 1 space per 500 square feet of floor area. Staff recommends using this requirement for breweries. Most breweries employ five to ten people for the brewing work. If a brewery were 4,000 square feet, a minimum of 8 parking spaces would be required. 2 A Taproom would require parking similar to that required of Class III Restaurants, which is 1 space per 60 square feet plus 1 space per 25 square feet of bar area. Staff recommends this minimum parking requirement for the taproom portion of a brewery. A Brewpub would be very similar to Class III Restaurants in the City. Class III Restaurants are defined in the City's zoning ordinance as any type of night club, tavern, restaurant or other facility providing entertainment, food and/or beverage that provides sit-down service but may also provide standup bar service and standup tables within the premises. Staff recommends that the parking requirements for Class III Restaurants also apply to Brewpubs, which is 1 space per 60 square feet of floor area plus 1 space per 25 square feet of bar area. Liquor Licensing A separate liquor license from the City would be required for all of the above proposed uses after the brewery has obtained a license from the State of Minnesota. The City license requirements would address the hours of operation, outdoor patios, entertainment, maximum capacity by barrels per year, growler standards, conduct on the premises, violations, fees, and special events. The City Clerk is currently leading the work to draft recommendations to amend Chapter 5 of the City Code to provide for these new kinds of licenses. Those recommendations are tentatively scheduled for consideration by City Council in January and February. Food Trucks Since taprooms do not serve food, many taprooms throughout the metropolitan area partner with mobile food trucks to provide food for customers. When permitted,these licensed food trucks can operate on the taproom property for a portion of the day or night. Food trucks are not currently permitted or licensed in the City of Golden Valley. The consideration of permitting food trucks was kept separate from the proposed zoning code text amendments outlined in this memo, since food trucks present a different set of issues and considerations. This topic will be considered in the future. Attachments Underlined/Overstruck Version of City Code Section 11.03: Definitions (2 pages) Underlined/Overstruck Version of City Code Section 11.30: Commercial Zoning District (1 page) Underlined/Overstruck Version of City Code Section 11.35: Light Industrial Zoning District (1 Page) Underlined/Overstruck Version of City Code Section 11.47: Mixed Use Zoning District (2 pages) Underlined/Overstruck Version of City Code Section 11.70: Off-Street Parking and Loading Regulations (2 pages) 3 Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission December 22, 2014 Page 11 The PUD plan is consistent with preserving and improving the general health, safety nd general welfare of the people o the City. 6. PUD plan meets the PUD Inte and Purpose provision and all other PUD ordi nce provisions. Conditions: 1. The plans epared by EVS, recei d December 17, 2014, shall be c e a part of this approva f 2. The recommendations and require ents outlined in the me rom the Engineering Divisi to Jason Zim erman, Planning Marl, -`er, dated December 16, 2014, shall become art of this a prova1. 3. All principal buildings sh Il confor to the rear and a property setbacks when adjacent to a single family ming strict as outliin Section 11.55, Subd. 3(C)(1). �:ned 4. No buildings shall be located let an fifteen feet from the back of the curb line for roads that are part of the internal r d system as outlined in Section 11.55, Subd. 3(C)(2) unless adequate separatio 'i8�3provided through additional landscaping, berming or similar means. 4 5. The Applicant shall prohibit the inst Ilatior <of fences within the development. 6. Homeowners Association cover6n , regarding design and building materials shall be reviewed by the City prior,,-t'o' Fin I Plan apprayal. 7. All signage must meet the,r`equire nts of the Citys Sign Code (Section 4.20). 8. Permits to construct parking bays o the property at�7400 Laurel Avenue shall be obtained by that property owner an shall not be Iocat&d,closer than fifteen feet to the side property lire, as required i " Section 11.47, Sub&,q(B), unless a variance is obtained.:, 9. Easement agreements related to pe rking and the retaining walkshall be reviewed by the City a d shall be recorded w h the Final Plat. `4 10. A park dedi,ation fee of $17,400, o '2% of the land value, shall be id before Final Plat appr ial, 11. The ma mum building height, as d fined by City Code, shall be 28 feet Qr the home on Lots 1-4, 9-12 and 17-20, ,and 35 feet for the homes on Lots 5-' 13-16 and 1-24. 12. T re shall be no structures located utside of the building envelope area, an o riances granted for structures to b located outside of the building envelope ar a. 13. he Final Plat shall include "P.U.D. 117" in its title. 1 This approval is subject to all other st te, federal, and local ordinances, regulations, or laws with authority over this develo ment. 4. Informal Public Hearing — Zoning Code Text Amendment — Adding Brewery and Taproom Language — ZO00-93 Applicant: City of Golden Valley Purpose: To consider adding language to the Zoning Code regarding breweries and taprooms. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission December 22, 2014 Page 12 Goellner reminded the Commissioners that they discussed options for permitting and regulating breweries, taprooms and brewpubs at their March 10, 2014 meeting. She discussed the definitions of a brewery, taproom, and brewpub. She stated that staff is recommending that breweries and taprooms limited to less than 25% of the brewery floor area, be a permitted use in the Light Industrial and Industrial Zoning Districts, and a conditional use in the Mixed Use Zoning District. The staff recommendation for brewpubs is that they be a conditional use in the Commercial Zoning District and a permitted use in the Mixed Use Zoning District. Goellner referred to the parking requirements and stated that a brewery has parking needs similar to those of a manufacturing facility, 1 space per 500 square feet of gross floor area, and a taproom would require parking similar to a Class III restaurant, 1 space per 60 square feet of floor area plus 1 space per 25 square feet of bar area. Goellner referred to the distance regulations in the Light Industrial and Industrial Zoning Districts and stated that staff is recommending 75 feet for uses facing R-1 and R-2 Zoning Districts, 100 feet for uses adjoining R-1 and R-2 Zoning Districts and 50 feet for uses adjoining R-3, R-4, Business and Professional Offices, and Institutional Zoning Districts. Goellner stated that issues such as hours of operation, outdoor patios, indoor/outdoor entertainment, special events, maximum brewing capacity, growler standards, conduct on the premises, violations, and fees will be addressed in the liquor licensing section of City Code. She added that food trucks, and their partnering with taprooms, will be considered in the future since food trucks are not currently permitted or licensed. Kluchka opened the public hearing. John Keenan, Under Pressure Brewing, said he is concerned about limiting the size of the taproom to 25% of the brewery floor area. He said it seems restrictive and that 40% to 50% would be better, but not overbearing, and would offer more community gathering space. Kluchka asked if this is a seasonal business with outdoor space. Lori Ertl, Under Pressure Brewing, said there aren't many buildings in Golden Valley that would allow outdoor space. She said limiting the size of the taproom space will limit their customer base, their business, and their profitability, and it will also limit the City's tax base. She said they need the taproom space to be larger in order to make the business viable. She added that they are not looking to make this into a bar scene, but they need to have a larger taproom space. Waldhauser asked Ertl to give examples of some local taprooms that operate how she would like to operate. Ertl gave several examples, and said they would like to do a 7 barrel system which will give them 14 kegs at a time. Keenan said they may provide keg sales to local restaurants as well. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission December 22, 2014 Page 13 Seeing and hearing no one else wishing to comment, Kluchka closed the public hearing. Blum said he is concerned about establishments only serving alcoholic beverages without offering a food component to help people regulate their alcohol content. He said he feels more comfortable knowing that food could be brought in by the customers. Kluchka suggested that the liquor license could require a food option to be offered. Baker asked if the Zoning Code and liquor license changes could happen quickly enough to allow Under Pressure Brewing to open fairly soon. Zimmerman stated that consideration of the liquor licensing and Zoning Code changes will align at same City Council meeting. Baker questioned where the language came from regarding taprooms only being allowed in less than 25% of the floor space. Goellner stated that she came up with that number while researching other communities' requirements. She explained that the point is to keep the taproom accessory to the brewery. She suggested that if an applicant wants to have a larger taproom a conditional use permit could be required. Kluchka suggested that the ordinance language be changed to say taprooms larger than 30% require a conditional use permit. Segelbaum agreed that 25% or 30% is a good place to start. Baker suggested a 60%-40% split between the brewery and taproom spaces. Cera suggested the language be changed to "less than 50%" of the floor space could be used for taproom space. The Commissioners agreed that they would like the language to be changed to state that 30% of the floor space can be used for the taproom, and if an applicant wants more than that they can apply for a conditional use permit. Kluchka questioned what kind of provisions, such as size, location, noise and odor, the Commission should recommend. Blum suggested that these types of establishments be located near public transportation. Segelbaum noted that taprooms, and not breweries, are proposed to be a permitted use in the Light Industrial Zoning District. He questioned if breweries should be a conditional use. Baker questioned where bars are allowed. Goellner stated that Class III restaurants (bars, nightclubs, taverns, etc.) are allowed with a Conditional Use Permit in the Commercial Zoning District, and are a permitted use in the Mixed Use Zoning District. Waldhauser referred to the proposed parking requirements and said that taprooms seem to be more akin to fast food restaurants with very dense seating. She suggested that there be a higher parking ratio for taprooms. Goellner suggested a higher parking ratio for the bar and seating areas. The Commissioners agreed that they would like the parking requirement to be 1 space per 40 square feet of gross floor area. Segelbaum suggested the definition of taproom be changed to read as follows: A facility accessory to a brewery that is licensed by the City to sell the malt liquors made at the brewery for consumption on the premises. He said that changing the definition will keep it consistent with the definition of brewery and clarifies that the consumption takes place Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission December 22, 2014 Page 14 on the premises. Kluchka asked if that means a taproom couldn't sell growlers. Segelbaum stated that the taproom is accessory to the brewery, and that they would have to be a brewery first in order to sell growlers. Goellner added that both on-sale and off-sale licenses would be required to have a taproom and sell growlers. Blum asked about the definition of malt liquor. Goellner said malt liquor is defined in the liquor licensing section on the City Code as follows: Any beer, ale, or other beverage made from malt by fermentation and containing not less than one-half of one percent alcohol by volume. Kluchka suggested taking the words "such as beer and ale" out of the definition of brewery in order to be consistent. Segelbaum questioned if retail sales should be limited to taprooms, or if breweries would also be allowed to sell accessory retail items. Goellner said she would speak with the City Attorney regarding retail sales in a brewery. Segelbaum asked if other communities have different hours for taprooms versus bars. Goellner stated that most communities' hours for taprooms are Wednesday through Sunday 4 pm to 11 pm. She added that hours of operation would be addressed in the liquor licensing section of the City Code. Kluchka stated that there are several bike trails in Industrial areas and maybe they will be a good fit with these proposed uses. MOVED by Segelbaum, seconded by Kluchka and motion carried unanimously to recommend the Zoning Code text amendment regarding breweries, taprooms and brewpubs subject to the following changes: 1. The parking requirement for a taproom shall be 1 space per 40 square feet of gross floor area. 2. The definition of taproom shall be changed to read as follows: A facility accessory to a brewery that is licensed by the City to sell the malt liquors made at the brewery for consumption on the premises. 3. The proposed language shall be changed to allow 30% of the floor area to be used for a taproom. If an applicant wants a taproom larger than 30% of the floor area a conditional use permit must be obtained. 4. Language shall be added regarding allowing retail sales in a brewery. -- hort Recess-- 5. Reports on Me ' gs of the ousing and Redevelopment Authority, City Council, Board of ing peals and other Meetings Baker gave an update on the mos e ottineau Station Area Planning Committee meeting and stated that the e community meeting regarding the Bottineau Light Rail project on Jan at the ourag enny Rehabilitation Institute. Section 11.03: Definitions 8. Automobile Wrecking: The dismantling or disassembling of used motor vehicles or trailers, or the storage, sale or dumping of dismantled, partially dismantled, obsolete or wrecked vehicles or their parts. Source: Ordinance No. 585 Effective Date: 1-14-83 8.5. Average Grade: The average ground elevation of a house or structure taken at three (3) points along a building line facing a street. If the house or structure faces more than one (1) street, the average grade shall be for all sides facing the street. Source: Ordinance No. 382, 2nd Series Effective Date: 3-28-08 9. Basement: That portion of a building with at least three (3) walls having at least one-half (1/2) or more of their floor-to ceiling height underground. 10. Brewery: An establishment licensed by the City for the manufacture of malt liquors, such as beer and ale, for sale in sealed containers for consumption off the premises. 11. Brewpub: A Class III Restaurant establishment, as defined in this section, that is also licensed by the City to brew malt liquor, such as beer or ale, on site for sale and consumption on the premises, or for sale in sealed containers for consumption off the premises. 1-0. Buildable Area: That area of a lot which is exclusive of all yards and within which the principal building must be constructed. Source: Ordinance No. 585 Effective Date: 1-14-83 14. Building: Any structure for the shelter or enclosure of persons, animals or property of any kind and when separated by dividing walls without openings, each portion of such buildings, so separated, shall be deemed a separate building. Source: Ordinance No. 80, 2nd Series Effective Date: 11-28-91 4-2. Building, Height: The vertical distance or height of a structure shall be measured from the average grade at the front building line (street side) to the average height of the highest pitched roof or the highest point of a flat roof structure. The grade or average grade of a lot is established at the time of subdivision approval by the City. If the grade or average grade was not established at the time of subdivision approval by the City, the Director of Public Works shall establish the average grade prior to construction of the structure. In the case where a house or structure has been removed from a lot for the construction of a new house or structure, the average grade for the new house or structure shall be no more than Section 11.03: Definitions one (1) foot higher than the grade or average grade that existed for the house or structure that was removed. In the case of a corner lot, the average grade is taken from all sides of the house or structure facing the street. 89. Street Line: A dividing line between a lot, tract, or parcel of land and a contiguous street. 99. Structure: Anything erected, the use of which requires more or less permanent location on the ground, or attached to something having a permanent location on the ground. 91. Structural Alterations: Any change in the supporting members of a building, such as bearing walls or partitions, columns, beams or girders, or any substantial change in the roof or in the exterior walls. 92. Substantial Improvement: Any repair, reconstruction, or improvement of a structure, the cost of which exceeds fifty percent (50%) of the market value of the structure a) before the improvement or repair is started, or b) if the structure has been damaged, and is being restored, before the damage occurred. Substantial improvement is considered to occur when the first alteration of any wall, ceiling, floor, or other structural part of the building commences, whether or not that alteration affects the external dimensions of the structure. The term does not include either 1) any project for improvement of a structure to comply with existing State or local health sanitary or safety code specifications which are solely necessary to assure safe living conditions or 2) any alteration of a structure listed on the National Register of Historic Places or State Inventory of Historic Places. Source: Ordinance No. 585 Effective Date: 1-14-83 92.5. Sustainable Development: Development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. Source: Ordinance No. 397, 2nd Series Effective Date: 6-6-08 93. Taproom: A facility accessory to a Brewery that is licensed by the City to sell the malt liquors made at the Brewery for consumption on the premises. 93. Tower: A structure whose function is to support and elevate an antenna, water tank, or other fixture as provided in this chapter. In all cases, the height of a tower shall be measured from the ground level regardless of whether the tower is mounted on another structure or building, and said height shall also include any portion of the antenna or other fixture which extends above the highest reach of the tower itself. Section 11.30: Commercial Zoning District P. Heliports, as herein defined Source: Ordinance No. 643 Effective Date: 11-16-84 Q. Child Care Facilities, as defined in this Chapter Source: Ordinance No. 712 Effective Date: 6-23-88 R. Marine Engine Repair Source: Ordinance No. 4, 2nd Series Effective Date: 8-25-88 S. Adult Day Care Center Source: Ordinance No. 264, 2nd Series Effective Date: 12-13-01 T. Essential Services - Class III, except for peaking stations and substations Source: Ordinance No. 271, 2nd Series Effective Date: 11-15-02 U. Brewpubs Subdivision S. Restricted Uses No premises shall be used wholly or in part for the storage of any material whatsoever except where such materials are stored in a building and where the character of such building conforms with the general development of a Commercial District and no building or premises in the Commercial District shall be used for any kind of manufacture, repairing, alteration, converting or finishing which uses mechanical power aggregating more than five (5) horsepower per two thousand (2,000) feet of ground area. Ground area means the total area of the lot or parcel of land on which a building using mechanical power is located and not just the area of the part of the lot or parcel of land actually covered by the building. Source: Ordinance No. 569 Effective Date: 7-16-82 Deleted Loading & Parking Requirements Source: Ordinance 346, 2nd Series Effective Date: 7-1-06 *Subdivision 6. Yard Requirements Front yard, side and rear yards shall be provided for all buildings within the Commercial Zoning District as follows: A. In the case of premises abutting a public street, front yard setbacks shall be at least thirty-five (35) feet from the right-of-way line of said street. All front yard setbacks shall be maintained as landscaped green areas. All portions of a lot, or parcel, abutting a public street shall be deemed to be front yards. Section 11.35: Light Industrial Zoning District H. Other light manufacturing uses that would not constitute a nuisance or health hazard to surrounding or adjacent residential or commercial districts Source: Ordinance No. 546 Effective Date: 9-18-81 I. Essential Services - Class I and Class III Source: Ordinance No. 271, 2nd Series Effective Date: I1-15-02 J. Temporary Retail Sales in accordance with Subdivision 12 of this section Source: Ordinance No. 118, 2nd Series Effective Date: 9-22-94 K. Sexually Oriented Businesses Source: Ordinance No. 326, 2nd Series Effective Date: 4-15-05 L. Breweries. Limited and associated retail use such as merchandise related to the Brewery may be,sold. M. Taprooms, that occupy up to 30% of the gross floor area of the Brewery_ Limited and associated retail use such as merchandise related to the Brewery may be sold in the taproom. Subdivision 4. Conditional Uses The following uses may be allowed as Conditional Uses after review by the Planning Commission and approval by the Council following the standards and procedures set forth in this Chapter: A. Building materials yard (including inside and outside storage) B. Public garages for repairing and storing motor vehicles C. Laundries and dry-cleaning plants D. Animal hospital where domestic animals are received for treatment, care and cure by a duly licensed veterinary physician and surgeon in the customary and ordinary pursuit of his profession E. Ball fields and other recreation facilities F. Research and development laboratories and pilot plant operations incidental thereto Section 11.35: Light Industrial Zoning District G. Greenhouses with no outside storage, including an outside growing area no larger than the greenhouse building area. Retail sales may be permitted only where located inside and incidental to a wholesale business. H. Packaging and/or bottling of soft drinks or dairy products I. Bakeries (commercial-wholesale) J. Day care facilities provided that said facilities serve only dependents of persons employed on the same premises as are otherwise permitted by this Chapter Source: Ordinance No. 546 Effective Date: 9-18-81 K. Health, fitness and/or exercise facilities, including dance studio, gymnastic training, weight lifting studio, aerobic exercise and gymnasiums Source: Ordinance No. 573 Effective Date: 8-27-82 L. Heliports, as herein defined Source: Ordinance No. 643 Effective Date: 11-16-84 M. Food packaging and processing that involves cooking, heating, smoking, soaking or marinating procedures Source: Ordinance No. 664 Effective Date: 7-12-85 N. Child Care Facilities, as defined in this Chapter Source: Ordinance No. 712 Effective Date: 6-23-88 O. Truck/Van Terminals Source: Ordinance No. 50, 2nd Series Effective Date: 11-21-90 P. Medical clinics Source: Ordinance No. 82, 2nd Series Effective Date: 2-27-92 Q. Trade Schools or Training Centers Source: Ordinance No. 252, 2nd Series Effective Date: 7-26-01 R. Adult Day Care Center Source: Ordinance No. 264, 2nd Series Effective Date: 12-13-01 Section 11.35: Light Industrial Zoning District S. Drive-in bank facilities with frontage on a collector or minor arterial street Source: Ordinance No. 274, 2nd Series Effective Date: 12-27-02 T. Accessory retail services and/or sales incidental to a permitted use, conducted in an area less than ten percent (10%) of the building's footprint Source: Ordinance No. 283, 2nd Series Effective Date: 9-12-03 U. Taprooms that occupy 30% or more of the gross floor area of the Brewery. Limited and associated retail use such as merchandise related to the Brewery may sold in the taproom. Subdivision 5. Prohibited Uses No building, structure, or land shall be used, and no building or structure shall be erected, altered or enlarged which is intended or designed, for any of the following uses: A. Residential dwellings B. Hotels, motels, rooming houses, or tourist homes C. Institutional uses Source: Ordinance No. 546 Effective Date: 9-18-81 D. Except as provided herein, retail commercial uses, such as shopping centers Source: Ordinance No. 326, 2nd Series Effective Date: 4-15-05 Deleted Loading & Parking Requirements Source: Ordinance 346, 2nd Series Effective Date: 7-1-06 *Subdivision 6. Yard Requirements Front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks shall be required in the Light Industrial Zoning District as follows: A. In the case of premises abutting a public street front yard setbacks shall be at least thirty-five (35) feet from the right-of-way line of said street. All front yard setbacks shall be maintained as landscaped green areas. In the case of corner lots all portions of said lot abutting a public street shall be deemed to be a front yard. Section 11.47: Mixed Use Zoning District C. All permitted uses in the Commercial Zoning District, provided that such uses are combined with other permitted or conditional uses within a mixed-use building, and that the gross floor area occupied by any such single use shall not exceed ten thousand (10,000) square feet. D. Class I and III Restaurants E. Business and professional offices, provided that the gross floor area occupied by the use(s) on any lot shall not exceed ten thousand (10,000) square feet. F. Medical clinics G. Live-work units H. All uses permitted in the Institutional Zoning Districts, I-1 through I-3 I. Child Care Facilities J. Adult Day Care Centers K. Structured parking accessory to any permitted use L. Brewpubs Subdivision 4. Conditional Uses A. Class II Restaurants B. Any permitted use in the Commercial zoning district in a free-standing building. C. Any permitted or conditional use allowed in the Commercial zoning district occupying more than ten thousand (10,000) square feet of gross floor area. D. Business and professional offices occupying more than ten thousand (10,000) square feet on any zoning lot. The City Council may establish a maximum amount of office development that will be permitted on any zoning lot, based upon traffic studies as required by the I-394 Overlay Zoning District, using appropriate minimum Levels of Service. E. Research and development laboratories F. Convenience stores, including the sale of gasoline. G. Drive-in or drive-through facilities accessory to any permitted or conditional use. H. Buildings exceeding the height limits specified in Subdivision 6(D). Section 11.47: Mixed Use Zoning District I Breweries. Limited and associated retail use such as merchandise related to the Brewery may be sold. J Taprooms Limited and associated retail use such as merchandise related to the Brewery may be sold in the taproom. ORDINANCE NO. 540, 2ND SERIES AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE Amending Section 11.03 Definitions, 11.30 Commercial Zoning District, 11.35 Light Industrial Zoning District, 11.47 1-394 Mixed Use Zoning District, and 11.70 Off-Street Parking and Loading Regulations Regarding Breweries, Taprooms and Brewpubs The City Council for the City of Golden Valley hereby ordains as follows: Section 1. City Code Section 11.03 Definitions. New definitions #10, #11, and #93 are added to read as follows and the remaining definitions renumbered accordingly: 10. Brewery: An establishment licensed by the City for the manufacture of malt liquors, such as beer and ale, for sale in sealed containers for consumption off the premises. 11. Brewpub: A Class III Restaurant establishment, as defined in this Section, that is also licensed by the City to brew malt liquor, such as beer or ale, on site for sale and consumption on the premises, or for sale in sealed containers for consumption off the premises. 93. Taproom: A facility accessory to a Brewery that is licensed by the City to sell the malt liquors made at the Brewery for consumption on the premises. Section 2. City Code Section 11.30, Subdivision 4 is amended by adding the following Conditional Use: U. Brewpubs Section 3. City Code Section 11.35, Subdivision 3 is amended by adding the following Permitted Uses: L. Breweries. Limited and associated retail use such as merchandise related to the Brewery may be sold. M. Taprooms, that occupy up to 50%of the gross floor area of the Brewery. Limited and associated retail use such as merchandise related to the Brewery may be sold in the taproom. Section 4. City Code Section 11.35, Subdivision 4 is amended by adding the following Conditional Use: U. Taprooms that occupy 50% or more of the gross floor area of the Brewery. Limited and associated retail use such as merchandise related to the Brewery may be sold in the taproom. Section 5. City Code Section 11.47, Subdivision 3 is amended by adding the following Permitted Use: L. Brewpubs Section 6. City Code Section 11.47, Subdivision 4 is amended by adding the following Conditional Uses: I. Breweries. Limited and associated retail use such as merchandise related to the Brewery may be sold. J. Taprooms. Limited and associated retail use such as merchandise related to the Brewery may be sold in the taproom. Section 7. City Code Section 11.70, Off-Street Parking and Loading Regulations, Subdivision 3 is amended by adding the following uses under the Industrial section: Brewpub - 1 space per 60 s.f. of floor area plus 1 space per 25 s.f. of bar area. Brewery - 1 space per 500 s.f. of floor area. Taproom - 1 space per 60 s.f. of floor area. For every 2 bicycle spaces provided, 1 car space may be reduced from minimum parking requirement, for no more than 15% of the required spaces. Section 8. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99 entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 9. This Ordinance shall take effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law. Adopted by the City Council this 20th day of January, 2015. /s/Shepard M. Harris Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: /s/Kristine A. Luedke Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk 0 , T/ MEMORANDUM � V - Planning Department 763-593-8095/763-593-8109(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting January 20, 2015 60 day deadline: December 22, 2014 60 day extension: February 20, 2015 Agenda Item 4. C. Public Hearing- Final PUD Plan for Laurel Ponds One PUD No. 117 - 305 and 345 Pennsylvania Avenue South - Lake West Development, LLC, Applicant Prepared By Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager Summary Lake West Development, LLC, is seeking approval of a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Permit to construct 24 detached townhome units across 3.3 acres at 305 and 345 Pennsylvania Avenue South. As part of the Preliminary PUD process, the properties were rezoned to Medium Density Residential (R-3) and reguided for Medium-Low Density Residential use on the General Land Use Plan Map. The proposed PUD would allow the Applicant to consolidate the two properties and construct the townhomes in three phases. The existing single family home and garage at 305 Pennsylvania and the existing office building at 345 Pennsylvania, along with the two parking lots, would be demolished. Layout The proposal consists of six east-west rows - each with four single family homes -that proceed up the hillside from Laurel Avenue. Rows 1 and 2, at the bottom of the hill, are separated by a 24' wide two-way private street (Laurel Point) that accesses Pennsylvania but terminates short of the adjacent parking lot to the west (belonging to WorkAbilities). Rows 3 and 4 as well as Rows 5 and 6 are separated by a similar 20' wide one way private street (Laurel Curve) that loops and connects along the east side of the property above an existing retaining wall. Parking Each home would be constructed with a garage able to hold two vehicles. Plans also show enough room for two vehicles to be parked in each driveway without encroaching into the street. Parking along the internal private streets would be limited to one side except along a narrower portion of Laurel Curve where parking would be prohibited entirely. It is anticipated twelve vehicles could be accommodated on-street on the internal street system. Four additional parking bays are shown along Laurel Point and eight additional parking bays are shown along Laurel Curve. The options for four additional proof of parking spaces are indicated at various places along the internal road system-two on Laurel Point and two on Laurel Curve. The Applicant has been coordinating with WorkAbilities to provide 20 spaces of guest parking on its property during non-business hours. A draft easement agreement has been submitted to the City that outlines this arrangement. The Applicant has also explored the possibility of adding four parking bays in the southeast corner of the property that would partially reside on the WorkAbilities site and has marked these spaces as "proof of parking" on the plans. The construction of these parking spaces would require future approval of a variance by the City and the recording of a shared parking agreement. In summary, the parking totals would be as follows: 48 garage spaces 48 driveway spaces 12 internal parking bay spaces 12 internal on-street spaces 4 "proof of parking" spaces along the internal streets 4 "proof of parking" spaces with WorkAbilities 20 guest spaces on the WorkAbilities property Landscaping The City has an existing 55' wide drainage and open space easement along Laurel Avenue. The Applicant is proposing that the northernmost 10' of that easement be designated as a drainage and utility easement for the bottom row of homes and allow that area to be included in the land utilized for yards. The remaining 45' would be landscaped and a new infiltration basin would be constructed within the City's easement. Plans indicate the construction of a public gathering space at the corner of Laurel and Pennsylvania Avenues. The Applicant intends to install a new public sidewalk along Pennsylvania Avenue as well as a sidewalk along the east side of the property to provide additional pedestrian access between the upper and lower portions of the development. Modifications from Preliminary PUD Plans Two minor changes were made to the proposal since the Preliminary PUD Plan last came before the City Council: 1. The number of units in the development has been reduced from 27 to 24. 2. The width of the Drainage, Open Space, and Walkway easement has been restored to 55'. Final Plat Process Due to the unique circumstances of the site and the timing of the proposed development, the Applicant has asked that while the Final Plat be reviewed and approved in its entirety, the actual recording would happen in three distinct phases. Phase 1 would involve the single family home currently located at 305 Pennsylvania Avenue. As there will be a delay before the developer can take possession of the 345 Pennsylvania property, this would allow work to begin on demolition of the existing home and the construction of a model home in its place. This work is anticipated to begin immediately after approval of the Final Plat. The Applicant has indicated Phase 2 would be recorded in April, once the developer is able to take control of the property at 345 Pennsylvania, and would plat the first eight lots located at the bottom of the hill where the lower parking lot now sits, as well as the infiltration basin. At this point, work could commence with the construction of these eight homes while demolition took place on the existing office building. Some recycling of materials is expected to occur on-site so as to reduce the number of truck trips to and from the development. Demolition is expected to be completed by July 30. Phase 3 would be recorded after demolition of the office building and would plat the remaining 15 parcels as well as the right of way for Laurel Curve. As part of this arrangement, the City would hold money in escrow to cover the cost of the demolition of the office building. Findings and Conditions The Planning Commission reviewed this proposal at their December 22 meeting and voted unanimously to recommend approval (7-0). City Code establishes standards for PVDs, which are laid out in the Staff report to the Planning Commission. In addition, City Code establishes findings that must be made by the City when creating a PUD. The Council makes the following findings pursuant to City Code Section 11.55, Subd. 6(Q): 1. The PUD plan is tailored to the specific characteristics of the site and achieves a higher quality of site planning and design than generally expected under conventional provisions of the ordinance. 2. The PUD plan preserves and protects substantial desirable portions of the site's characteristics, open space and sensitive environmental features including steep slopes, trees, scenic views, creeks, wetlands and open waters. 3. The PUD plan includes efficient and effective use (which includes preservation) of the land. 4. The PUD plan results in development compatible with adjacent uses and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and redevelopment plans and goals. 5. The PUD plan is consistent with preserving and improving the general health, safety and general welfare of the people of the City. 6. The PUD plan meets the PUD Intent and Purpose provision and all other PUD ordinance provisions. Staff recommends approval of the Final PUD Plan subject to the following conditions: 1. The plans prepared by EVS, received December 17, 2014, shall become a part of this approval. 2. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Engineering Division to Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager, dated December 16, 2014, shall become a part of this approval. 3. All principal buildings shall conform to the rear and side property setbacks when adjacent to a single family zoning district as outlined in Section 11.55, Subd. 3(C)(1). 4. No buildings shall be located less than fifteen feet from the back of the curb line for roads that are part of the internal road system as outlined in Section 11.55, Subd. 3(C)(2) unless adequate separation is provided through additional landscaping, berming or similar means. 5. The Applicant shall prohibit the installation of fences within the development. 6. Homeowners Association covenants regarding design and building materials shall be reviewed by the City prior to Final Plan approval. 7. All signage must meet the requirements of the City's Sign Code (Section 4.20). 8. Permits to construct parking bays on the property at 7400 Laurel Avenue shall be obtained by that property owner and shall not be located closer than fifteen feet to the side property line, as required in Section 11.47, Subd. 6(B), unless a variance is obtained. 9. Easement agreements related to parking and the retaining wall shall be reviewed by the City and shall be recorded with the Final Plat. 10. A park dedication fee of$17,400, or 2% of the land value, shall be paid before Final Plat approval. 11. The maximum building height, as defined by City Code, shall be 28 feet for the homes on Lots 1-4, 9-12, and 17-20, and 35 feet for the homes on Lots 5-8, 13-16, and 21-24. 12. There shall be no structures located outside of the building envelope area and no variances granted for structures to be located outside of the building envelope area. 13. A Development Agreement signed by the Applicant will outline the timing and terms associated with the demolition of the existing buildings, including the related funds to be held in escrow by the City. 14. The Final Plat shall include "P.U.D. No. 117" in its title. 15. This approval is subject to all other state, federal, and local ordinances, regulations, or laws with authority over this development. Attachments • Location Map (1 page) • Applicant's Narrative (4 pages) • Memo to the Planning Commission dated December 22, 2014 (7 pages) • Unapproved Planning Commission Minutes dated December 22, 2014 (8 pages) • Memo from the Engineering Division dated December 16, 2014 (12 pages) • Color Site Rendering (1 page) • Site Plans dated December 17, 2014 (18 pages) • Final Plat (3 pages) • Ordinance #541 (3 pages) Recommended Action Motion to adopt Ordinance #541, Approval of Final PUD Plan, Laurel Ponds One PUD No. 117, Lake West Development, LLC, Applicant. s1. ra!n Avt .....�� a'�'�ll!'`.y�rn'uZe,',.+Yl:— '�i.✓ '�-= / ) )) ' J l..iomq Par/(_—� 1 / o 2 2 y T Subject Properties: 305 & 345 Pennsylvania Ave. S. o x /! '� Colon�ol Ru Quebec AveS¢ • ' West Rigg Pornd n ESS Ring Pond L.—1 Ave _— vi • N s � t � 1 rd.trk tt Jl 5 DEVELOFMEN -F CO . - LLC Planning Commission & Council c/o Manager Burt, Asst. Mgr. Knauss December 14, 2014 Planning Manager Zimmerman, Physical Dev. Mgr. Nevinski All senior and legal staff City of Golden Valley 7800 Golden Valley Road Laurel Ponds One PUD, Final Development plans submittal Lake West Development, LLC has submitted full revisions, which comply with the 27 lot plans approved by the City Council for the approved PUD. We have now lowered the total dwelling unit count to 24 dwelling units (6 rows of 4 units each) and seek your approval for that plan. All engineering and related departmental issues are believed satisfied by the plan submittal contents. Site amendments from staff and design team since initial plan approval Planning commission approved 30 dwelling units. The Council approved 27 dwelling units. The upper loop road changed from two-way to one way, entering at the middle of the site and exiting at the top of the hill. The design allows for less concern about departing "trips" from the neighborhood impacting the Quebec intersection. Staff allowed for a customized home design, meaning not a perfect rectangle, at the entrance to Quebec to create a four-way style intersection. The ponding area is more curvilinear with use of small boulder walls, maintaining a sitting area, tree planting creates a more defined corridor for the Laurel trail, and since the pond drains dry, a wildflower planting scheme has a greater chance of being the dominant plant form for the retention pond area. Only two homes now take direct access to Pennsylvania, down from five originally proposed. Additional downcast fixture heads being added to the existing overhead poles by XCEL will enhance street lighting. This creates better light for pedestrians and autos at the intersection points. As part of Council comments in their approval, there was requested consideration for less density. Some builder partners have also expressed interest in a wider footprint. As part of the final PUD approvals we have therefore submitted a plan for only 24 dwelling units and will not seek the use of the 27 unit plan alternative. 14525 1lighwa}- 7, Suite 102 • Mim-tetonka, MN 55345 • Phone: 952-930-;000 • Fax: 952-653-2198 Development Phasing Update The landscaping plans and building elevations show how the sidewalk network, the plantings, and the infiltration pond serve to enhance the neighborhood. Due to the overhead power poles location along Pennsylvania, the discussed sidewalk amenity will be 7' wide through our neighborhood solely because this is a City template width. Should the PC and Council believe that less width is appropriate, please note the same to staff. We have connected the sidewalk to the curb as the north 130' will preserve slopes on the back side of the sidewalk. Staff has not confirmed a date, plan width or strategy to extend the sidewalk north from our site to Western Avenue, which was verbally encouraged by some neighbors at past meetings. Our portion would be in place by about September of 2015. Ponding areas on Laurel would be completed by mid summer 2015 and trees on the perimeter would be completed by October 2015. Interior trees and those within 20' of a structure not completed before October would be installed in the proper month and year of completion. A high percentage of landscaping would be able to be completed in 2016. An attachment showing approximate dates of housing starts is attached, which may slide forward or backward by about 3 months depending on weather and interest rates. Final Plat Recording Laurel Ponds One P.U.D. No. 117 has been approved for use at the Hennepin County Recorders office. Laurel Ponds was already in use. The creation of Lot 1, Block 1 allows for the start of a model home, completes the initial entitlement to define the area of the project and allows a closing on the 305 Pennsylvania property without encumbering the ongoing operations of the Speak the Word Church building. This is important, as City construction guidelines have restricted the ability to work on new sewer and water connections, and properly grade the site until after road restrictions lift, which is on or about May 1, but could be as late as May 15. We can however, reuse the existing services to 305 and demolish the existing home and build one model while we wait for proper weather. We would hope to record this in late January based on the current City calendar of approvals and permits. This proposed design would allow the Church to consent to the plat, but not be party to the signature page. There operations would continue in a building entirely situated on lot 2 of that Block. The Laurel Ponds One P.U.D. No. 117 2nd Addition plat would be recorded about 2 months after Plat One and allows the current building to be entirely inside of lot 1 Block 2 as labeled for discussion. This addition creates 8 additional lots at the bottom of the hill and preserves a lot for the building. This would occur about April 1St. Additional real estate would still be used in the HOA docs descriptions. We would expect to stage machinery on site to be in place when postings go on, or work with the City on appropriate permits to place machinery. Plat number two creates 8 additional lots at the bottom of the hill and preserves a lot for the building. We would use this plat to close with Speak The Word Church and the lender. We would be able to construct new road and lots in the south third, while we wait for demo of the existing building and the ability to only then grade and place new streets and utility work into the site for new home sites in the middle of the site. The Laurel Ponds One P.U.D. No. 117 3`d Addition would be recorded upon completion of the demo of the existing building on or about July 30. This will create the final lots and would allow for some minor adjustments of internal lot corners, should that be identified in the final working drawings or by the County plat check process. It removes the concern about platted lots being created over an existing building. Lake West would be 100 % in fee title for this plat. All the roadways and common areas required of the plat would now be created for use in the homeowner's association docs. 345 Pennsylvania Building Demo Recycling After we commence work on the lower roadway named Laurel Pointe, the existing building will be removed. Current recycling techniques allow for on site sorting, recycling and breaking of the concrete into smaller size particles. This work consumes less total energy than removing as loose material offsite. This recycling allows for some concrete to be reused in appropriate locations of the new development and also minimizes trucking into and out of the site of building materials. The ability to recycle much of the building concrete will allow fewer truck trips in and out of the site using Pennsylvania Ave since the existing building is in the middle of the site, can not use Workabilities driveway for this function and can not go down the hill either. We believe we cut the amount of truck traffic by 1/3 through the use of recycling operations. Demo will take about 4 to six weeks start to finish, then site grading, then new pipe work, then paving. That will consume about 3 months of time. Neighborhood features With previous narratives, we outlined the neighborhood and its features. This will have an HOA, no fences, small pets allowed, maintenance by the HOA, snow shoveling, plowing of walks and drives, and in heavy snow years off site removal to approved offsite locations. The homes will have hip roofs at the north property line and have 15' or less exposed wall fagade. An interior sidewalk creates a connection to the guest parking features of the Workabilities parking lot agreement area. This sidewalk will have stairs and be about level with the existing retaining walls. Fewer dwelling units means even less parking concern that was discussed at length at previous Council meetings. There are currently a total of 20 guest parking stall options on the property plus 2 car garages and garage aprons. 2 additional proof of parking stalls remain, and due to the style of design, the parallel defined parking bays may actually fit more cars than we state, as the passenger car fleet is shrinking a little. We still have an agreement with the neighbor, Workabilities for true overflow parking. Postal boxes will be in clusters worked out with the Louisiana Ave branch manager. Cluster boxes will be at the entry locations for both private drives and include lockable units and small parcel lockers as part of the design. See attached exhibit. Drainage and Open Space Amenity The south 55' is enhanced by excavation for storm water and is detail designed as an infiltration basin with a seating rest area at the intersection of Laurel Ave. Most of the time this design allows for water to drain dry. This means that we can typically get a wet wildflower mix to become a dominant planting along with new trees and shrubs at the edges and to create a stronger arbor or corridor flanking the public trail on Laurel Ave. We have talked with the parks division about creating a place for their signs that show the public trail network that is the Laurel trail. The sidewalk along Pennsylvania creates a new opportunity to get to the public Park on Western. Boulders provide interest and retaining edges for seating, play and grade change options. None are more than 30" of exposed height. This public space should be able to be completed in the late fall of 2015. Respectfully, Donald Jensen Land Development Director Attachments: Plats and building plan set electronically attached. Cc: Curt Fretham,Dave Nash—EVS,Luanna Ball-Workabilities CiQ 0 golden ., '. MEMORANDUM valley Planning Department 763-593-8095/763-593-8109(fax) Date: December 22, 2014 To: Golden Valley Planning Commission From: Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager Subject: Informal Public Hearing Final PUD Plan for Laurel Ponds One PUD No. 117 305 and 345 Pennsylvania Avenue South Lake West Development, LLC, Applicant Background Lake West Development, LLC, is seeking approval of a Planning Unit Development (PUD) Permit to construct 24 detached townhome units across 3.3 acres at 305 and 345 Pennsylvania Avenue South. As part of the Preliminary PUD process, the properties were rezoned to Medium Density Residential (R-3) and reguided for Medium-Low Density Residential use on the General Land Use Plan Map. The property at 305 Pennsylvania currently contains a single family home;the property at 345 Pennsylvania currently contains an office building and two large parking lots. The site is bounded by Pennsylvania Avenue to the west and Laurel Avenue to the south. Single family homes are located to the north and west; commercial properties are located to the south and east. The proposed PUD would allow the Applicant to consolidate the two properties and construct 24 detached townhomes in three phases. The existing single family home and garage at 305 Pennsylvania and the existing office building at 345 Pennsylvania, along with the two parking lots, would be demolished. Layout and Site Elements The proposal consists of six east-west rows—each with four single family homes—that proceed up the hillside from Laurel Avenue. Rows 1 and 2, at the bottom of the hill, are separated by a 24' wide two-way private street (Laurel Point) that accesses Pennsylvania but terminates short of the adjacent parking lot to the west (belonging to WorkAbilities). Rows 3 and 4 as well as Rows 5 and 6 are separated by a similar 20' wide one way private street (Laurel Curve)that loops and connects along the east side of the property above an existing retaining wall. h 7500 7400 30 113 26 10 7600 �' M 311 �4� g 20 15 20 25 7501 7470 IO - �. a•.: .r« .ees i 50 35 3 10 _ tSa X490 A�@ 75 90 95 70 75 C) 45 50 5- " 7500 C 90 95 55 5( 19 110 s 90 115 110 q5 50 100 105 .pi' ' 110 0 115 1 115 11 7700 '> 75 'pa 205 .43, 130 135 tSf 130 135 g`�S 130 ,� 135 t h Q1 235 130ry" 150 IM 135 13 j 7701 105 120e{A. ^, 1 4)� F' 155 150 155 150 L 1207751 `" h 250 ,, 265 150 f ,55 174 175 210 155 15 W 7540 , 205 ?> - 170 175 200 ,er 175 215 211 220 225 {j 7600 �s4y 310 305 170 190 195 230 245 s4 4` r-+ 33Q 345 210 235 231 800 �t 7605 215 250 350 230 235 t 255 250 7601 7721 400 401 1 27Q 460 440 420 120 421 420 421 480 70 501 500 501 500 1 501 421 20 521 7700 521 520 521 510 7400 7100 L4 reIAve .. Lau r 0 611 7701 + 623700 648 675 7425 Laurel Ave a 723 716 710 705 0 0 n c 743 732 825 750 705 Pennsylvania Ave S 850 816 814 - o PUD 117 - Site Map All but two of the homes in the development would have driveways off of the internal circulation system; these two homes would have direct access onto Pennsylvania Avenue. The development is being marketed with detached townhomes, a relatively new product in Golden Valley. The Applicant has suggested that potential homeowners prefer this type of product and that the detached model allows the builder more options for variety in floor plans and architecture as compared to attached townhomes. A Homeowners Association is planned that would cover snow removal and maintenance. The current document does not prohibit the installation of fences, as required by the condition approved with the Preliminary PUD. Lot widths within this development range from 36' to 53' and lot depths range from 80' to 100'. A typical separation between homes to the side would be 10'. A typical separation between homes to the rear would be 25'—though there are some exceptions which potentially reduce this distance to 15'. A number of the homes will be able to be constructed to allow for single level living, with additional basement or second floor space available as needed. Building pad sizes are estimated to fall within a range of 1,768 to 2,442 square feet with total living area potential (including basements and second floors) of 4,144 to 6,286 square feet. The Applicant has estimated traffic generation to be 8.5 trips per unit per day, resulting in a total of 204 trips per day. Parking Each home would be constructed with a garage able to hold two vehicles. Plans also show enough room for two vehicles to be parked in each driveway without encroaching into the street. Parking along the internal private streets would be limited to one side except along a narrower portion of Laurel Curve where parking would be prohibited entirely. It is anticipated twelve vehicles could be accommodated on-street on the internal street system. Four additional parking bays are shown along Laurel Point and eight additional parking bays are shown along Laurel Curve. The options for four additional proof of parking spaces are indicated at various places along the internal road system—two on Laurel Point and two on Laurel Curve. The Applicant has been coordinating with WorkAbilities to provide 20 spaces of guest parking on its property during non-business hours. A draft easement agreement has been submitted to the City that outlines this arrangement. The Applicant has also explored the possibility of adding four parking bays in the southeast corner of the property that would partially reside on the WorkAbilities site and has marked these spaces as "proof of parking" on the plans. The construction of these parking spaces would require future approval of a variance by the City and the recording of a shared parking agreement. In summary, the parking totals would be as follows: 48 garage spaces 48 driveway spaces 12 internal parking bay spaces 12 internal on-street spaces 4 "proof of parking" spaces along the internal streets 4 "proof of parking" spaces with WorkAbilities 20 guest spaces on the WorkAbilities property Landscaping The City has an existing 55' wide drainage and open space easement along Laurel Avenue. The Applicant is proposing that the northernmost 10' of that easement be designated as a drainage and utility easement for the bottom row of homes and allow that area to be included in the land utilized for yards. The remaining 45' would be landscaped and a new infiltration basin would be constructed within the City's easement. Plans indicate the construction of a public gathering space at the corner of Laurel and Pennyslvania Avenues. The Applicant intends to install a new public sidewalk along Pennsylvania Avenue as well as a sidewalk along the east side of the property to provide additional pedestrian access between the upper and lower portions of the development. Three new streetlights are proposed to be installed on the existing power poles along Pennsylvania Avenue. The Applicant has indicated the development will cover the installation and that ongoing costs will be paid by the new residents. Modifications from Preliminary PUD Plans Based on feedback from residents and the City Council, as well as requests from potential builders, the Applicant has reduced the number of proposed units from 30 to the subsequent 27 and now to 24. The width of the existing Drainage, Open Space, and Walkway easement—which had previously been reduced to 45'—is now being maintained at 55', though the northernmost 10' will be able to be used as back yard space by the first row of homes. Responding to a request from the Engineering Division, the lower drive (Laurel Point) has been shifted to align with Quebec Avenue to the west. Planning Considerations As part of the Preliminary PUD Plan application, the City reguided both properties to Medium-Low Density Residential on the General Land Use Plan Map. This designation accommodates densities of 5 to 11.9 units per acre. This would be consistent with the proposed PUD density of 7.3 units per acre. The two properties were also rezoned to Medium Density Residential (R-3), which provides for medium density housing of up to 10 units per acre. This would be consistent with the proposed PUD density of 7.3 units per acre. Even with the proposed R-3 rezoning, there are a number of ways in which the current proposal varies from the underlying zoning designation: Medium Density District (R-3) Laurel Ponds One PUD No. 117 Permitted Uses Attached townhomes Detached townhomes Dimensional Standards Buildable lots, area 15,000 sq. ft. minimum All less than 15,000 sq. ft. Buildable lots, width 100' at the front setback line Generally 36' to 44' Impervious coverage Not to exceed 60%of lot area 52% Front yard setback 25' 15' from Pennsylvania; typical distance to internal streets would be 20' Side and rear yard setback 30' to R-1; 20' otherwise 15' along Pennsylvania. Typical distance between homes would be 10' for side yards and 25' for rear yards Maximum density 10 units per acre 7.3 units per acre Height 4 stories or 48' in height 2 to 3 stories Subdivision 3(C)(1) of the PUD section of the Zoning Code states that no principal building shall be closer than its height to the rear or side property line when such line abuts a single family zoning district. The row of homes furthest north has a setback of 15' from the adjacent single family properties indicated on the plans. Actual required setbacks will be determined based on specific building plans submitted for review. Subdivision 3(C)(2) of the PUD section of the Zoning Code states that no building shall be located less than fifteen feet from the back of the curb line along those roadways which are a part of the internal road system. There are a handful of locations within the proposed development where the potential exists for homes to be violation of this requirement, though this will not be known until specific building plans are submitted for review. Some minor deviations may be allowed provided adequate separation is provided through additional landscaping, berming or similar means. These conditions will be reviewed at that time. Subdivision 6 of the PUD section of the Zoning Code states that private streets shall not be approved unless a waiver is granted by the City. As part of the Preliminary PUD process, it was determined that private streets would be appropriate for this development. Engineering Considerations As is standard practice for development proposals, plans for this proposal were reviewed by the City's Engineering Division to ensure the site can be adequately served by public utilities and that traffic issues are resolved. A memorandum from the Engineering Division that addresses access, easements, sanitary sewer and water services, grading, stormwater management, and tree preservation is attached. Fire Safety Considerations The Fire Department reviewed this proposal to ensure that fire safety provisions are addressed and adequate emergency vehicle access is achieved on the site. The Fire Chief has indicated that concerns about fire hydrant placement and road width raised as part of the Preliminary PUD process have been resolved. Final Plat Process Due to the unique circumstances of the site and the timing of the proposed development, the Applicant has asked that while the Final Plat be reviewed and approved in its entirety, the actual recording would happen in three distinct phases. Phase 1 would involve the single family home currently located at 305 Pennsylvania Avenue. As there will be a delay before the developer can take possession of the 345 Pennsylvania property, this would allow work to begin on demolition of the existing home and the construction of a model home in its place. This work is anticipated to begin immediately after approval of the Final Plan. The Applicant has indicated Phase 2 would be recorded in April, once the developer is able to take control of the property at 345 Pennsylvania, and would plat the first eight lots located at the bottom of the hill where the lower parking lot now sits, as well as the infiltration basin. At this point, work could commence with the construction of these eight homes while demolition took place on the existing office building. Some recycling of materials is expected to occur on-site so as to reduce the number of truck trips to and from the development. Demolition is expected to be completed by July 30. Phase 3 would be recorded after demolition of the office building and would plat the remaining 15 parcels as well as the right of way for Laurel Curve. As part of this arrangement, the City would hold money in escrow to cover the cost of the demolition of the office building. Justification for Consideration as a PUD The PUD process is an optional method of regulating land use in order to permit flexibility in uses allowed, setbacks, height, parking requirements, and number of buildings on a lot. Applications for PUDs must be consistent with the Intent and Purpose provisions and the PUD requirements and principles and standards adhered to in the City. In order to be approved as a PUD, the City must be able to make the following findings: 1. Quality Site Planning. The PUD plan is tailored to the specific characteristics of the site and achieves a higher quality of site planning and design than generally expected under conventional provisions of the ordinance. The City has spent a significant amount of time working with the Applicant to accommodate the unusual features of the site, including a significant change in elevation from north to south as well as the presence of an existing 55' Drainage, Open Space, and Walkway easement. Staff believes this standard has been met. 2. Preservation. The PUD plan preserves and protects substantial desirable portions of the site's characteristics, open space and sensitive environmental features including steep slopes, trees, scenic views, creeks, wetlands, and open waters. The Applicant has taken advantage of the elevation changes on the site by arranging the homes in such a way as to maximize views. In addition, the existing City-owned easement will be enhanced to provide a neighborhood gathering space while also addressing stormwater runoff. Staff believes this standard has been met. 3. Efficient– Effective. The PUD plan includes efficient and effective use (which includes preservation) of the land. The density and layout of the proposed development efficiently utilizes the property to provide a type of housing currently lacking in the City. The greater intensity of use provides a transition between the single family neighborhoods to the north and west and the industrial areas to the south. Staff believes this standard has been met. 4. Compatibility. The PUD plan results in development compatible with adjacent uses and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and redevelopment plans and goals. The use of this property for detached townhomes is compatible with the neighboring properties and the density being proposed is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. Staff believes this standard has been met. 5. General Health. The PUD plan is consistent with preserving and improving the general health, safety and general welfare of the people of the City. Staff believes this standard has been met. 6. Meets Requirements. The PUD plan meets the PUD Intent and Purpose provision and all other PUD ordinance provisions. While the current proposal does vary significantly from many of the requirements of the underlying zoning district—including from the permitted use and the lot size and lot dimension standards—the end product is one that serves a growing demand in the City and creatively redevelops a site in need of reinvestment. Setbacks and other PUD dimensional requirements have been met. The City finds that private streets are appropriate for this development. Staff believes this standard has been met. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the Final Plan for Laurel Ponds One PUD No. 117, subject to the following conditions: 1. The plans prepared by EVS, received December 17, 2014, shall become a part of this approval. 2. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Engineering Division to Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager, dated December 16, 2014, shall become a part of this approval. 3. All principal buildings shall conform to the rear and side property setbacks when adjacent to a single family zoning district as outlined in Section 11.55, Subd. 3(C)(1). 4. No buildings shall be located less than fifteen feet from the back of the curb line for roads that are part of the internal road system as outlined in Section 11.55, Subd. 3(C)(2) unless adequate separation is provided through additional landscaping, berming or similar means. 5. The Applicant shall prohibit the installation of fences within the development. 6. Building materials shall be reviewed by the City prior to Final Plan approval. 7. All signage must meet the requirements of the City's Sign Code (Section 4.20). 8. Permits to construct parking bays on the property at 7400 Laurel Avenue shall be obtained by that property owner and shall not be located closer than fifteen feet to the side property line, as required in Section 11.47, Subd. 6(B), unless a variance is obtained. 9. Easement agreements related to parking and the retaining wall shall be reviewed by the City and shall be recorded with the Final Plat. 10. A park dedication fee of$17,400, or 2%of the land value, shall be paid before Final Plat approval. 11. The Final Plat shall include "P.U.D. No. 117" in its title. 12. This approval is subject to all other state, federal, and local ordinances, regulations, or laws with authority over this development. Attachments Location Map (1 page) Applicant's Narrative (4 pages) Memo from the Engineering Division dated December 16, 2014 (12 pages) Color Site Rendering (1 page) Site Plans dated December 17, 2014 (18 pages) Final Plat (3 pages) Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission December 22, 2014 Page 4 10. Staff does not anticipate any o er negative effects of t ended use. Bringing e use into the church buildin will allow for co ation and increased e i es on the property. Conditions: 1. The plans by submitted bY�A licant on November 21, 2014, shall become a part of this approval. 2. The recommend3ti6ns and quirements ou i the memo from Fire Chief John Crelly to Jas Zimmerman Planning Manager, date er 6, 2014, shall become rt of this approv 3. All si ge must meet the r quirements of the City's Sign Code (Section 4.20). 4. T ' approval is subject to I other state, federal, and local ordinances, regulations, laws with authority over t is development. 3. Informal Public Hearing — Informal Public Hearing — Final PUD Plan Review — Laurel Ponds, PUD #117 Applicant: Lake West Development, LLC Address: 305 and 345 Pennsylvania Avenue South Purpose: To allow for a 24-unit, detached townhome development Zimmerman explained the Applicant's proposal to demolish the existing structures at 305 and 345 Pennsylvania Avenue South and construct 24 detached townhomes on the site. He discussed the modifications from the Preliminary PUD plans including: the reduction in the number of units from 30 to 24, keeping the drainage, open space and walkway easement 55 feet wide instead of reducing it, and redesigning the internal street, Laurel Point, to align with Quebec Avenue South. Zimmerman referred to a site plan and explained the proposed layout which includes six rows of homes with four single family homes in each row, accessed via Pennsylvania Avenue. There will be one private street (Laurel Point) to the south that would dead end with emergency vehicle access over grass pavers via the WorkAbilities property. The two entry points to the north would be connected with a private loop street (Laurel Curve), and all but two homes would have access from the internal circulation system', the others would have access via Pennsylvania Avenue. He stated that the lot widths and depths will vary from 36 feet to 53 feet in width, and from 80 feet to 100 feet in depth. The typical distance between the homes would be 10 feet to the side and 25 feet to the rear, and the homes could potentially have 4,144 to 6,286 square feet of living area. He added that there will be a homeowner's association for maintenance and snow removal. Zimmerman showed the Commissioners a comparison chart that illustrates how this proposed PUD differs from the underlying R-3 Zoning District requirements. He explained that the areas in which they differ are lot width, and front, side and rear yard setback requirements. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission December 22, 2014 Page 5 Zimmerman discussed the on-site parking and stated that there will be two garage stalls for each unit, plus two parking spaces on each driveway. He added that some parking bays will be constructed along the internal streets, and that the parking will be limited to one side of the street except along the east loop connection. He said there will also be four to eight proof of parking spaces, and an area for guest parking through an easement, on the WorkAbilities site next door. Zimmerman discussed the landscaping on the site and stated that a stormwater infiltration basin would be constructed within the City's easement along Laurel Avenue. Also, the northernmost 10 feet of the easement would be available for back yard space without structures. He added that sidewalks will be added along Pennsylvania Avenue and on the east side of the site to connect the upper and lower portions. Zimmerman stated that the platting of the property will be done in phases. The first plat will allow for the demolition of the single family home and for the construction of a model home. The second plat will create eight lots to the south and allow for the demolition of the office building. The third plat will create the final 15 lots. He added that the City will hold money in escrow to ensure the existing building is demolished as required. Johnson asked about the difference between detached townhomes and single family homes. Zimmerman stated that detached townhomes have a homeowners association. Johnson asked if the space between the homes would have to be larger if they were single family homes. Zimmerman said yes. Waldhauser questioned the condition to preclude fencing on the site. Zimmerman said there is language in the association covenants and in Staff's conditions of approval regarding fences. Baker noted that the R-3 Zoning District allows structures to be four stories or 48 feet in height and asked if the homes proposed in this project could be built that tall. Zimmerman stated that language applies when considering properties in the R-3 Zoning district, and doesn't necessarily apply to a PUD proposal. He stated that the Applicant is only proposing two and three story structures. Baker questioned how the City could prevent the Applicant from building four story structures. Zimmerman explained that a PUD approval approves the plans submitted with the application that are reviewed by the Planning Commission and City Council. Baker said he is concerned about a really tall, dense development. Kluchka said he is more conscience of the building materials. Segelbaum asked if the applicant can go beyond the height shown in their plans. Waldhauser reiterated that the plans submitted by the Applicant are what is being approved. Zimmerman stated that a more explicit condition regarding height can be added. Waldhauser asked if the homeowners will be able to have decks, and noted that the lack of fencing may not allow for fencing around patios. Zimmerman said there is not much room for decks, but some of the lots might have space for a patio. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission December 22, 2014 Page 6 Blum stated that the Bassett Creek Watershed Commission has some concern about the stormwater infiltration basin and asked if the Applicant has done anything to address those concerns. Zimmerman said the Engineers have been working together regarding the infiltration basin and they feel comfortable recommending approval subject to the conditions in the Staff reports. Baker asked if the approval of the Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission could be made a condition of approval. Zimmerman said he is not sure of the Bassett Creek Watershed Commission's procedures, but he knows the Applicant won't be able to obtain building permits without their approval. Johnson asked if detached townhomes are a permitted use in the R-3 Zoning District. Zimmerman said no. He added that detached townhomes are a fairly new product and that they would only be allowed with a PUD. Cera asked how variances would be handled. Zimmerman suggested creating a building envelope as a condition of approval. Cera stated that the width of the streets vary and asked if they could be more standard. Zimmerman explained that the streets are wider when they are two-way and narrower when they are one-way. He added that the Fire Department is comfortable with the proposed width of the streets. Kluchka asked Zimmerman to summarize the private street requirements. Zimmerman stated that PUDs require public streets unless a waiver is granted. Baker asked about the minimum width for a one-way City street and noted that there is one point in this proposal where the street is 16 feet wide. He questioned if that is wide enough. Waldhauser said she thinks two vehicles could pass each other on a 16 foot wide street if needed. Waldhauser asked if the homeowners could plant trees on their lots. Zimmerman said yes. Baker asked about a possible walkway around the stormwater infiltration basin and asked if the picture shown is just conceptual, or actually where trees will be planted. Zimmerman referred to the landscaping plan in the agenda packet showing where trees would be planted. Segelbaum asked if 7 foot wide sidewalks are standard. Zimmerman stated that the City typically asks for 8 foot wide sidewalks when possible, but realizes there are places where that won't work. Kluchka asked if the sidewalk committee has reviewed the plans. Zimmerman said they haven't yet reviewed the plans, and noted that the sidewalk dead ends on the north of the site. Kluchka asked if there have been additional neighborhood meetings held. Zimmerman said no, but the Applicant has shared the current renderings, narrative, and how the project has evolved with the neighbors. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission December 22, 2014 Page 7 Kluchka referred to the requirement regarding hip roofs for the houses on the north side of the site. Zimmerman stated that a hip roof is lower than a house with a gable roof, and will be less impactful on the properties to the north. Don Jensen, Lake West Development, Applicant, showed the Commissioners a site plan of his original proposal for 30 townhomes and discussed how that original plan evolved into this current plan for 24 townhomes. He stated that the current parking requirements for the R-3 Zoning District are one parking stall inside and one parking stall outside. This design proposes two stall garages and two stall driveways for each unit and some on street parking which equals almost five stalls per dwelling unit. He stated that the homeowner's association would not allow fencing between units, but would not preclude privacy fencing for patios. He discussed the drainage patterns on the site and how the bio-retention infiltration basin will work. He discussed the architectural style of the proposed homes and showed the Commissioners photos and elevations of the potential houses. He referred to a site plan and discussed the internal sidewalk system and the guest parking on the neighboring WorkAbilities site. He discussed his plan for the phasing of construction and stated that construction would start on the south end of the property. Cera asked about the price of the homes. Jensen said their target market is empty nesters and the cost of the homes will range from $300,000 to $400,000. Waldhauser asked if the storm sewer and drainage are located in the back yards between the houses that back up to each other. Jensen said yes, and discussed the storm sewer plans. Kluchka asked for clarification regarding the fencing requirements. Jensen stated that homeowners would not be allowed to fence in their entire yard, but a patio located within the building envelope would be allowed. Baker stated that hedges could create the same effect as a fence and asked if hedges would be allowed. Jensen stated that the homeowner's association documents would state what is allowed, or not allowed and added that they will also have to preserve the drainage areas. Blum asked Jensen how he can ensure there will be variability in the design of the homes. Jensen stated that there will be architectural controls in the homeowner's association covenants such as no two homes with the exact design or same color will be allowed next to each other. Baker said he is concerned about the potential height of the houses. Jensen reiterated that the approval will be consistent with the plans that were submitted. He said he sees no reason to build a four story house. Baker questioned if the cost of the homes would really be $300,000 to $400,000 if they are 4,000 to 6,000 square feet in size. Jensen stated that the 4,000 to 6,000 square feet is the envelope size. Baker said he this the values will be higher, and questioned if someone could build a million dollar home. Jensen said that would be highly unlikely because the homes in the area average $200,000 to $400,000. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission December 22, 2014 Page 8 Kluchka asked who would be controlling the design standards. Jensen said that the developer, along with the builders will control the designs. Cera asked if the homeowner's association will have any design control. Jensen stated that the homeowner's association will have an architectural review board. Baker referred to the width of the streets and asked Jensen how he can rationalize that a 16 foot wide road, with a 6% grade and snow storage is viable. Jensen said that he can't say that no one will ever get stuck, but they have designed a one way street in order to not have excess pavement, and that the association will control the snow removal. He added that the streets will function the vast majority of the time. Kluchka opened the public hearing. Adam Hiler, 305 Pennsylvania Avenue South, said he is frustrated with the process. He said the developer has done a lot of things and that the City has made it very difficult. He said he is obviously trying to sell his house and he feels like the developer is having to jump through a lot of hoops. He said he understands that the City is trying to make this project right for the neighborhood, but it is frustrating hearing multiple questions that have already been answered. Steve Devitt, 235 Pennsylvania Avenue South, asked if the project is restricted to just one builder. Seeing and hearing no else wishing to comment, Kluchka closed the public hearing. Kluchka stated that this is the Final plan review and questioned if the Planning Commission feels that the significant benefits of this plan exceed what will be given up by going beyond the limits of the underlying zoning. Segelbaum said he thinks that question has been asked and answered by approving the Preliminary plan. Kluchka said he doesn't think the question has been answered. He said he thinks a lot of the issues have changed such as lowering the density, and not building in the easement area. He said enough has changed that he is re-evaluating whether it is enough anymore. Waldhauser said she thinks this plan is significantly better than the Preliminary plan. She said to get this level of density with quality construction is worthwhile, and that the developer has done a good job meeting their concerns. Baker said he agrees, but if a precedent is set, he thinks the City will likely see more of these very massive, densely constructed projects. Segelbaum reiterated that the approach has been decided because the City Council gave Preliminary plan approval. He said there however, are a number of issues that haven't been addressed yet, that he thought they would see at this Final plan stage. Kluchka said the first issue is determining the appropriate height of the structures. Segelbaum said he would like the height of the homes be less than 40 feet. Cera noted that the height limit in the Single Family Zoning District is 28 feet, so he wouldn't want to the structures in this proposal to be much taller than that. Zimmerman noted that building height is measured at the front of a structure. Baker said he would be in favor of restricting the Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission December 22, 2014 Page 9 height in this case. Kluchka questioned if there needs to be clarification regarding which elevation will be on which street. He said he doesn't want the homes to be out of scale with one another. Cera stated that the homes transition to a lower height when they get closer to the single family homes to the north. Johnson said he appreciates the Applicant's effort to transition the height of the homes, but questioned why these proposed homes wouldn't have the same requirements as other single family homes. Waldhauser said there are many home designs that would fit within the 28-foot height limit. Kluchka questioned if it would be reasonable to measure the height of the homes in the back yard. Baker said he would like to condition the front yard height. Segelbaum said he thinks it would be reasonable to apply R-1 standards and if the applicant wants to deviate from them, he'll have to ask. Kluchka suggested a condition stating that the height has to be the same as allowed in the R-1 Zoning District, but not the setbacks. Johnson suggested requiring proportionality, or the smaller the lot, the smaller the home allowed. Baker said he would be alright having 12 feet between the homes, but not having tall homes. Kluchka asked Jensen how he feels about adhering to the R-1 standards regarding height. Jensen said the plans submitted have been the same request from the beginning of the process. He said this isn't an R-1 area, it is meant to be a transition area that can be more dense. Baker said he doesn't know what the Planning Commission's response would be to an R-3 type of proposal and that doesn't affect how they are responding to this proposal. He added that he is concerned about how this fits into this very visible community, and he doesn't want it to be a "sore thumb." Kluchka said he thinks this is the right spot for a transitional space, but he wants to say something about the height. Cera noted that the applicant could build the structures together like a typical townhouse, and would not have to get planning approvals at all. Waldhauser stated that this is somewhat of a closed neighborhood and that the houses will all face each other except for the two homes on Pennsylvania Avenue, so she doesn't think it will stick out as being too tall. Baker disagreed and said the other houses in the area are mostly ramblers. He said he is nervous about the maximum height shown on the plans and he'd like to limit it. Cera said comparing this development to other houses in the area isn't fair because they were built at a different time. He suggested limiting the height of the houses on Laurel Curve to 28 feet and the ones on Laurel Point to 35 feet. Baker suggested limiting the entire PUD to 30 feet in height. Segelbaum suggested Lots 9- 24 be limited to 28 feet and the rest to 35 feet. Jensen said he would be comfortable saying that the home dimensions will be the same as shown in the plans submitted. Waldhauser stated that if the homes are truly aimed at empty-nesters they won't want large homes. Kluchka said he doesn't want a house to be 35 feet tall in the front and 45 feet tall in the back. He suggested that if the front of the house is on the downslope then the back of the house should be limited to 35 feet. Waldhauser suggested language stating that one side is limited to 28 feet, and one side is limited to 35 feet. Baker said he would rather specify the maximum height for each lot. He suggested the maximum height be limited to 28 feet for Lots 1-4, 9-12 and 17-20, and 35 feet for Lots 8-5, 13-16 and 21-24. The Commissioners agreed. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission December 22, 2014 Page 10 Kluchka said the next issue is the building envelope. Zimmerman stated that patios could be built beyond the building envelope, but decks could not. Segelbaum questioned if fences should be allowed around patios. Baker said he thinks that should be up to the homeowner's association. Cera suggested that a condition be added stating that no variances will be granted for structures outside of the building envelope. He questioned if a condition not allowing houses of the same design next to each other should also be added. Waldhauser suggested that the Applicant bring an example of the restrictions to the City Council meeting. Kluchka stated that the closest condition related to design standards is number six in the staff report which states that the building materials shall be reviewed by the City prior to Final Plan approval. Zimmerman explained that house designs can't be reviewed because there aren't house plans to review at this point in the process. He stated that the Commission could address materials, architectural guidelines and home styles. Segelbaum referred to the question regarding the restriction to one builder. Zimmerman stated that the Applicant is not restricted to one builder. Baker asked if a buyer could bring in their own builder. Jensen stated that projects like this typically have one or two builders who are able to work together. Kluchka referred to the proposed landscaping on the southwest corner and said he is not seeing a practical use when there is not a path proposed. He said he wants a more human connection, and it would be more useful to have a path to the area, and the benches closer to the sidewalk so people will use it. Waldhauser said it might be used more by the residents, not necessarily the public. Jensen said there is time to make changes, and that he agrees there should be a human connection. Kluchka summarized that a condition regarding the height of the homes and a condition regarding variances should be added. Also, condition number six in the staff report should be modified regarding design and building materials. MOVED by Baker, seconded by Cera and motion carried unanimously to recommend approval of the Final Plan for Laurel Ponds One PUD No. 117, subject to the following findings and conditions: Findings: 1. The PUD plan is tailored to the specific characteristics of the site and achieves a higher quality of site planning and design than generally expected under conventional provisions of the ordinance. 2. The PUD plan preserves and protects substantial desirable portions of the site's characteristics, open space and sensitive environmental features including steep slopes, trees, scenic views, creeks, wetlands, and open waters. 3. The PUD plan includes efficient and effective use (which includes preservation) of the land. 4. The PUD plan results in development compatible with adjacent uses and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and redevelopment plans and goals. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission December 22, 2014 Page 11 5. The PUD plan is consistent with preserving and improving the general health, safety and general welfare of the people of the City. 6. The PUD plan meets the PUD Intent and Purpose provision and all other PUD ordinance provisions. Conditions: 1. The plans prepared by EVS, received December 17, 2014, shall become a part of this approval. 2. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Engineering Division to Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager, dated December 16, 2014, shall become a part of this approval. 3. All principal buildings shall conform to the rear and side property setbacks when adjacent to a single family zoning district as outlined in Section 11.55, Subd. 3(C)(1). 4. No buildings shall be located less than fifteen feet from the back of the curb line for roads that are part of the internal road system as outlined in Section 11.55, Subd. 3(C)(2) unless adequate separation is provided through additional landscaping, berming or similar means. 5. The Applicant shall prohibit the installation of fences within the development. 6. Homeowners Association covenants regarding design and building materials shall be reviewed by the City prior to Final Plan approval. 7. All signage must meet the requirements of the City's Sign Code (Section 4.20). 8. Permits to construct parking bays on the property at 7400 Laurel Avenue shall be obtained by that property owner and shall not be located closer than fifteen feet to the side property line, as required in Section 11.47, Subd. 6(13), unless a variance is obtained. 9. Easement agreements related to parking and the retaining wall shall be reviewed by the City and shall be recorded with the Final Plat. 10. A park dedication fee of $17,400, or 2% of the land value, shall be paid before Final Plat approval. 11. The maximum building height, as defined by City Code, shall be 28 feet for the homes on Lots 1-4, 9-12 and 17-20, and 35 feet for the homes on Lots 5-8, 13-16 and 21-24. 12. There shall be no structures located outside of the building envelope area, and no variances granted for structures to be located outside of the building envelope area. 13. The Final Plat shall include "P.U.D. No. 117" in its title. 14. This approval is subject to all other state, federal, and local ordinances, regulations, or laws with authority over this development. 4. Informal Public Hearin Zoning Code Text Amendment— Adding Brewery Taproom Langua — ZO00-93 Applican'., City of Go en VaII Purpose: To c°`' er adding language to the Zoning Code regarding breweries d tap s. City 0f goldeniov�,' MEMORANDUM valley Public Works Department 763-593-8030/763-593-3988(fax) Date: December 19, 2014 To: Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager From: Jeff Oliver, PE, City Engineer Eric Eckman, Public Works Sp cialist Subject: Final PUD Review—Laurel Ponds One (305 and 345 Pennsylvania Avenue) Engineering staff has reviewed the final PUD plans, titled Laurel Ponds One, submitted by Lake West Development, LLC (Developer) for the proposed residential development located at 305 and 345 Pennsylvania Avenue South. The property proposed for development is bounded by Pennsylvania Avenue on the west, Laurel Avenue on the south, Workabilities, Inc. on the east, and single-family homes to the north. Since the preliminary PUD submittal, staff has met with the Developer to discuss the items listed in the preliminary review. After several meetings and plan revisions it appears the final PUD plans address the major concerns outlined previously. This memorandum discusses the remaining issues that must be addressed prior to approval of the final plat and Development Agreement. The comments contained in this review are based on the plans submitted to the City on October 23, 2014 with revisions dated December 4 and December 17, 2014. Site Plan and Access This development includes the construction of 24 detached homes situated along private streets, sidewalks, and open space with a stormwater basin located in the south portion of the property. The common area elements, including the open space, streets, sidewalks, storm sewer facilities, and stormwater basin, will be owned and maintained by the Developer or future homeowners association. The details of the maintenance obligations and responsibilities will be included in the Development and Maintenance Agreements drafted prior to consideration of final plat approval. Based on the plans submitted and discussions with the Developer,the Developer is proposing to construct the PUD in three phases: G:\Developments-Private\Laurel Ponds One PUD\FinaIPUDReview_121914_laurelponds.docx • Phase 1 includes demolition of the existing house at 305 Pennsylvania Avenue and construction of one (1) model home fronting on Pennsylvania Avenue in the northwest corner of the PUD. • Phase 2 includes construction of Laurel Point (the east-west street in the southern portion of the PUD), the stormwater basin, eight (8) homes located on Laurel Point, and demolition of the existing office building at 345 Pennsylvania Avenue. • Phase 3 includes the construction of Laurel Curve (the looped street in the northern portion of the PUD) and fifteen (15) homes. In order to ensure that the existing office building at 345 Pennsylvania Avenue is demolished in a timely manner, a financial security will be required as part of the Development Agreement. The financial security will be based on 125%of the estimated cost to demolish the building and properly remove any asbestos and hazardous materials found onsite. The Developer must perform an asbestos and hazardous materials survey and submit a cost estimate for the demolition and abatement. As discussed above, the existing house at 305 Pennsylvania Avenue and office building at 345 Pennsylvania Avenue will be demolished and all associated structures and pavements removed as part of the project. Permits from the City will be required for all building demolition, utility cutoffs, tree removals, and earthwork associated with demolition. A Right-of-Way Management Permit will be required for any excavations or obstructions within the City right-of-way. The Developer must provide a construction phasing plan as part of the final construction plan submittal. This plan must show and describe the temporary parking, staging, access, and other proposed activities related to construction of this PUD. The eight (8) homes in the south portion of the site will have access onto Pennsylvania Avenue South via Laurel Point, a 24-foot wide private street with guest parking bays. Based upon staff comments provided during the preliminary review, the Developer has modified the design of this street so that it aligns with the intersection of Quebec Avenue. The Developer has also designed the street to include a vehicle turnaround at the east terminus and an emergency vehicle access to and from the Workabilities parking lot. The fifteen (15) homes identified for construction in the final phase of development are located in the northern portion of the PUD and have access onto Pennsylvania Avenue via Laurel Curve, a private one-way street. The one-way entrance is proposed on the south leg of the loop and the exit on the north leg. The east-west portions of the street are 20-feet wide (back of curb to back of curb) and include guest parking bays. The north-south portion of Laurel Curve narrows to 16- feet wide (back of curb to back of curb) with a parking bay on one side. This narrow portion may be a concern for emergency vehicle access, especially in the winter. Since the preliminary PUD review, the Developer has worked with the City to address the parking concerns raised by staff. In addition,the Developer has been working with Workabilities to draft a parking easement that would allow Laurel Ponds guests to park on Workabilities' property during non-business hours. A copy of the recorded easement must be provided to the City, prior to final plat approval. G:\Developments-Private\Laurel Ponds One PUD\FinaIPUDReview_121914_laurelponds.docx During the preliminary PUD review, the City and the Developer discussed the option of constructing public streets and cul-de-sacs. The City typically requires the construction of public streets unless a waiver is obtained to construct private streets. In this case, the Developer is proposing streets that are narrower than the City standard, and therefore has opted to seek a waiver to construct private streets, which will be owned and maintained by the Developer or future homeowners association. A Maintenance Agreement between the Developer and the City will outline the requirements for maintaining the private streets, including regular street sweeping. It is anticipated that no traffic control or traffic operations would have to be modified as a result of this development. The Developer is proposing to construct a sidewalk for internal pedestrian circulation which will connect Laurel Curve and Laurel Point to the City's sidewalk system along Laurel Avenue. Staff recommends that the internal sidewalk be constructed to meet Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accessibility guidelines. This sidewalk will be owned and maintained by the Developer or future homeowners association. The Developer has also proposed to construct a public sidewalk along Pennsylvania Avenue from Laurel Avenue to the north boundary of the PUD. Staff reviewed the City's Comprehensive Plan and there is currently no sidewalk or trail identified along Pennsylvania Avenue South adjacent to this development. However, in light of the residential use proposed, staff supports the Developer's construction of a public sidewalk in this location. The City will own and maintain this sidewalk following construction by the Developer. Since the sidewalk is a public infrastructure improvement, a financial security will be required as part of the Development Agreement. The Developer must submit a final construction plan for the sidewalk ensuring that it meets City standards. Proposed Plat The property within this PUD consists of three existing parcels which are not part of a recorded plat. The Developer proposes to combine the three parcels and subdivide them into 24 residential lots,two outlots for the private streets, and an outlot in the south portion of the PUD for the open space and stormwater basin. As discussed earlier, the Developer proposes to construct the development in three phases, and therefore the sequencing of platting will follow that same phasing. The streets in this PUD will be private and the Developer has dedicated public drainage and utility easements over the entire outlots containing the streets and utilities. The final plat must include the dedication of drainage and utility easements along plat boundaries and internal lot lines consistent with the City's Subdivision Ordinance, except where modifications have been approved for this PUD. In addition, the Developer must ensure that the dedicated easements are sized appropriately to contain all public utilities within the PUD, including water service curb stop valves in front of the homes. There is currently a 55-foot wide public easement for drainage, open space, and walkway purposes adjacent and parallel to Laurel Avenue along the entire width of the property. The easement was dedicated to the City by a previous property owner and stipulates that no structures or improvements of any type shall be permitted over, on, and across the easement area. This easement is an extension of the Laurel Avenue Greenbelt nature area. The Laurel G:\Developments-Private\Laurel Ponds one PUD\FinaIPUDReview_121914_laurelponds.docx Avenue Greenbelt serves as a major buffer between the commercial/industrial uses along 1-394 and the residential neighborhoods to the north. In the preliminary review, the City raised concerns about reducing the size of this particular easement, especially with industrial uses present across the street to the south, and recommended that the Developer make every attempt to design a development that preserves this easement. The Developer has worked with the City on this point and has demonstrated that the easement area can be preserved as open space as part of this development. All improvements and amenities proposed within the 55-foot public easement area will be constructed and maintained by the Developer or future homeowners association. Details regarding the construction and maintenance of these improvements will be included in the Development and Maintenance Agreements drafted prior to consideration of final plat approval. Utility Plan Water The City's water supply system that provides service to this PUD has adequate capacity to accommodate the development. The Developer has proposed connecting to the City's watermain within Pennsylvania Avenue in three locations, and extending watermains into the development. Each of the three watermain runs would generally follow the street alignments and terminate with a hydrant at the east end of the run. The Developer will construct the watermains as part of the public infrastructure improvements associated with the development. Upon construction and acceptance by the City, the City will own and maintain the watermains, valves, hydrants, and water services from the mains to the curb stop valves, including the curb stop valves. Details regarding the public improvements constructed by the Developer are discussed later in this report. Sanitary Sewer The proposed development is located upstream of sanitary sewer system capacity issues identified in the sewersheds along the 1-394 corridor. The City's sanitary sewer system is effectively at capacity in these locations and there is limited capacity available for future redevelopment along the 1-394 corridor and areas upstream unless the inflow and infiltration of clear water can be reduced throughout the sewersheds that are tributary to the capacity issues. The City has an ongoing inflow and infiltration (1/1) reduction program. In addition to this program, the City is putting plans in place to reduce 1/1 in the City's portion of the sanitary sewer system in the 1-394 corridor over the next several years. Therefore, with continued inflow and infiltration reduction efforts, staff concludes that the existing wastewater system is adequate to accommodate the proposed development. Additional development and redevelopment within the 1-394 corridor sewersheds should be closely monitored to ensure that flows generated by redevelopment can be accommodated as 1/1 reductions occur. The Developer has proposed the extension of sanitary sewer mains which will connect to the City's sewer main within Pennsylvania Avenue in three locations, and then extend into the development. The sanitary sewer mains generally follow the alignment of the proposed streets. The Developer will construct the sanitary sewer mains as part of the public infrastructure G:\Developments-Private\Laurel Ponds One PUD\FinaIPUDReview_121914_laurelponds.docx improvements associated with the development. Upon construction and acceptance by the City, the City will own and maintain the sewer mains and manholes. Details regarding the public improvements constructed by the Developer are discussed later in this report. The plans submitted by the Developer indicate that the existing water and sewer service laterals serving the existing buildings on the property will be reused by homes fronting on Pennsylvania Avenue South. All existing and proposed sanitary sewer services for this property must comply with the City's Inflow and Infiltration (1/1) Ordinance. City records indicate that 305 Pennsylvania Avenue South has received a Certificate of 1/1 Compliance. The property at 345 Pennsylvania Avenue South has been inspected and is not compliant. Repair of the sewer will be required if it is to be reused and the Developer or Owner must enter into an 1/1 Deposit Agreement with the City to ensure that repairs are completed. In addition, the Developer or builder will need to obtain a Certificate of 1/1 Compliance for each new home prior to occupancy. The Developer will be required to obtain City Water and Sewer Permits and possibly other permits for removal and installation of the utilities serving this site. Plans will also need to be reviewed by the applicable agencies such as the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services, Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry, and Minnesota Department of Health. In addition, a City Right-of-Way Management Permit is required for all proposed excavations and obstructions within public rights-of-way and easements, and the restoration of boulevards and pavements must be in accordance with City standards. Street Lighting The Developer is proposing to add street lights at each of the three new intersections with Pennsylvania Avenue South. The City has a street light utility and therefore the Developer must obtain and submit cost estimates for the lights so they can be included as part of the public improvements. The City will draft a resolution to establish a street light district over the entire PUD, which may be considered at the same meeting as the final plat approval. The future homeowners within the PUD will be responsible for ongoing street lighting fees, consistent with the City's street light utility policy. Private Utilities All private utilities (gas, electric, and communications) serving the development must be placed underground, consistent with City Code. There is limited space within the private street corridors and most of that space will be devoted to water and sewer facilities. In order to provide the required clearance from the City's water and sewer mains, staff strongly recommends that the Developer and private utility companies explore the installation of private facilities through joint trench construction. This type of installation has been completed in many other developments within the City. The Developer must submit a revised Utility Plan showing the proposed location of the private underground facilities with the final construction plan submittal. Public Infrastructure Improvements The sanitary sewer and watermains within this PUD, the street lighting, and the sidewalk along Pennsylvania Avenue will be owned and maintained by the City, but will be constructed by the G:\Developments-Private\Laurel Ponds One PUD\FinaIPUDReview_121914_laurelponds.docx Developer. Therefore, the Developer will be required to design the utilities and sidewalk according to City standards and specifications and submit the final construction plans for review and comment. The utility plans must include drawings showing plan and profile views. The Developer will also be required to submit a financial security (letter of credit)for 150%of the estimated cost to construct the sidewalk, lighting, and sanitary sewer and water systems. This security will be further detailed in the PUD Development Agreement which will be considered at the time of final plat approval. The estimated costs provided by the Developer must include costs for a City representative to perform construction observation during utility installation. The Developer must submit an escrow for the construction observation which is separate from the letter of credit. Grading Plan The Developer has submitted a final grading plan which shows the re-grading of most of the property in order to construct the development and create a variety of lots which consist of ramblers, split levels, lookouts, and walkouts. The grading plan also shows the construction of three retaining walls within the development. One of the proposed retaining walls is a replacement of the failing concrete cast-in-place wall located on the Workabilities' property approximately 5-feet east of the east property line of the PUD. The entire wall is over 200-feet long and ranges in height from about 2 feet to 10 feet. The Developer has retained the services of a structural engineer that provided plans for the proposed walls and comments on the existing wall relative to the proposed PUD. The Developer has been working with the owner of the Workabilities property on the details of the temporary construction easement and retaining wall easement agreement. Copies of the recorded documents must be provided to the City, prior to final plat approval. Stormwater Management The proposed development is within the Sweeney Lake sub-watershed of the Bassett Creek Watershed and is therefore subject to the review and comment of the Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission (BCWMC). The plans indicate that most of the 3.31-acre site will be disturbed and graded, and an increase of approximately 18,700 square feet of impervious surface area is proposed. Therefore,the plans must include permanent stormwater quality Best Management Practices that meet the BCWMC requirements for developments, including rate and volume control and water quality functions. Sweeney Lake is listed as an impaired water for nutrients (phosphorus) by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. A Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Study was completed for the lake and approved by the Environmental Protection Agency in 2011. The Developer has proposed the construction of a biofiltration basin and pre-treatment sump structure in the south portion of the site. The City and BCWMC will review the stormwater plans and calculations to determine if the proposed Best Management Practices meet the goals and policies set forth in the Sweeney Lake TMDL Study. The Developer recently submitted plans to BCWMC and comments were received just before completion of this memorandum. The comments from BCWMC indicate that more work is G:\Developments-Private\Laurel Ponds One PUD\FinaIPUDReview_121914_laurelponds.docx required on the overall design of the stormwater basin. The Developer will need to address these comments soon to determine if there is an impact to the layout of the lots or open space area in the south portion of the PUD. The BCWMC comments are attached to this memorandum for reference. The proposed storm sewer system for this PUD generally runs from north to south along the eastern boundary of the PUD. Staff noted that, based on the grading plan submitted,the Developer should consider adding more catch basin inlets in the streets and in the turf areas at the end of certain swales. The entire storm sewer system in this PUD will be constructed, owned, and maintained by the Developer or future homeowners association. In addition, all permanent stormwater quality treatment facilities that are part of this PUD will be owned and maintained by the Developer or future homeowners association. A maintenance agreement between the Developer/future homeowners association and the City, outlining the ownership and maintenance responsibilities, must be executed before the issuance of permits. This development is subject to the City's Stormwater Management Ordinance. City Stormwater Management permits will be required for each phase of construction and individual permits will be required for each home before construction. In addition, the PUD project is subject to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's NPDES Construction Stormwater Permit and its requirements. A copy of this permit must be provided to the City, prior to issuance of any permits to begin work on site. Tree Preservation Plan This PUD is subject to the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance and requires a Tree Preservation permit. The plans submitted with this application include a Landscape Plan and a Tree Preservation/Removal Plan. Since the PUD will be constructed in multiple phases, the Developer will need to work with the City's Forestry staff to determine the specific permitting requirements for each phase of construction, including individual home construction, before approval of the final plat. Summary and Recommendations Engineering staff recommends approval of the Laurel Ponds One final PUD plan, subject to the comments contained in this review. Following is a summary of items that remain: 1. The Developer must submit a financial security to ensure that the existing office building at 345 Pennsylvania Avenue is demolished in a timely manner. The Developer must perform an asbestos and hazardous materials survey and submit a cost estimate for the demolition and abatement. 2. The Developer must provide a construction phasing plan as part of the final construction plan submittal. This plan must show and describe the temporary parking, staging, access, and other proposed activities related to construction of this PUD. 3. A copy of the recorded parking easement between the Developer and Workabilities must be provided to the City, prior to final plat approval. G:\Developments-Private\Laurel Ponds One PUD\FinaIPUDReview_121914_laurelponds.docx 4. A maintenance agreement between the Developer and the City will outline the requirements for maintaining the private streets, including regular street sweeping. 5. The Developer will need to work with the City on the details of the proposed public amenities within the 55-foot open space easement area. The details will be included in the Development and Maintenance Agreements drafted prior to consideration of final plat approval, as discussed in this review. 6. The Developer/Property Owner must enter into an 1/1 Deposit Agreement with the City to ensure that repairs to existing sanitary sewer services are completed. In addition, the Developer or builder will need to obtain a Certificate of 1/1 Compliance for each new home prior to occupancy. 7. The Developer must submit a revised Utility Plan showing the proposed location of the private underground facilities (joint trench construction recommended) with the final construction plan submittal. 8. The sanitary sewer and water supply system within this PUD, street lighting, and the sidewalk along Pennsylvania Avenue will be owned and maintained by the City, but will be constructed by the Developer. The Developer must submit final construction plans meeting City standards, as discussed in this review. 9. The Developer must submit a financial security (letter of credit) for 150%of the estimated cost to construct the sidewalk, lighting, and sanitary sewer and water systems. This security will be further detailed in the PUD Development Agreement which will be considered at the time of final plat approval. The Developer must also submit an escrow for the construction observation, which is separate from the letter of credit. 10. The Developer has been working with the owner of the Workabilities property on the details of the temporary construction easement and retaining wall easement agreement. Copies of the recorded documents must be provided to the City, prior to final plat approval. 11. BCWMC comments indicate that more work is required on the overall design of the stormwater basin. The Developer will need to address these comments soon to determine if there is an impact to the layout of the lots or open space area in the south portion of the PUD. 12. The Developer should consider adding more catch basin inlets in the streets and in the turf areas at the end of certain swales, to assist in preventing potential future drainage issues. 13. A Maintenance Agreement between the Developer/future homeowners association and the City, outlining the ownership and maintenance responsibilities of the storm sewer and stormwater quality treatment facilities, must be executed before the issuance of permits. 14. Since the PUD will be constructed in multiple phases, the Developer will need to work with the City's Forestry staff to determine the specific Tree Preservation permitting requirements for each phase of construction, including individual home construction, before approval of the final plat. Approval is also subject to the comments of the City Attorney, other City staff, and other agencies. Please feel free to call the Engineering Department if you have any questions regarding this matter. Attachment G:\Developments-Private\Laurel Ponds One PUD\FinaIPUDReview_121914_laurelponds.docx C: Tom Burt, City Manager Marc Nevinski, Physical Development Director John Crelly, Fire Chief Jerry Frevel, Building Official Bert Tracy, Public Works Maintenance Manager Al Lundstrom, Park Maintenance Supervisor and City Forester Kelley Janes, Utilities Supervisor Mark Ray, Street Maintenance Supervisor RJ Kakach, Engineer Tom Hoffman, Water Resources Technician 6:\Developments-Private\Laurel Ponds One PUD\FinaIPUDReview_121914_laurelponds.docx Q� December 16, 2014 Jeff Oliver City Engineer City of Golden Valley 7800 Golden Valley Road Golden Valley,MN 55427 Re: Laurel Pond Residential Development BCWMC #2014-28 Dear Mr. Oliver: We reviewed grading,drainage,and utility plans for the above referenced. The project is located in the Sweeney Lake watershed at the northeast quadrant of the intersection of Laurel Avenue and Pennsylvania Avenue South and includes demolition of existing buildings and parking lots and construction of 27 detached townhomes,two private roads,stormwater management features,and associated utilities. Approximately 3.5 acres will be graded on a 3.5 acre site resulting in an increase of approximately 0.44 acres of impervious area. The Sweeney Lake Total Phosphorus TMDL study was completed June 21,2011. In accordance to the TMDL study, it is recommended that infiltration and filtration BMPs be incorporated to reduce runoff conveying pollutant loads throughout the watershed. The proposed plan includes filtration BMPs consistent with the TMDL recommendations. In order for the plans to be in conformance with the policies of the Bassett Creek Watershed Management Plan,the following modifications must be made: 1. The following erosion control comments must be added to the plans: • The silt fence placement shown on Sheet C302 is adequate once the curb and gutter is installed. Silt fence placement prior to the start of construction and during initial grading must be continuous across the proposed roadways and must connect to the construction entrance such that sediment cannot leave the site between the construction entrance and the silt fence. • Cut off berm of rock construction entrances must have a minimum height of 2 feet above the adjacent roadway and maximum side slopes of 4:1. • Soils tracked from the site by motor vehicles must be cleaned daily(or more frequently, as necessary)from paved roadway surfaces throughout the duration of construction. Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission 7800 Golden Valley Road 1 Golden Valley,MN 55427 1 www.bassettcreekwmo.org I Established 1968 Crystal I Golden Valley 1 Medicine Lake 1 Minneapolis 1 Minnetonka 1 New Hope 1 Plymouth I Robbinsdale I St.Louis Park Jeff Oliver December 16,2014 Page 2 • Temporary vegetative cover must be spread at 1.5 times the usual rate per acre. If temporary cover is to remain in place beyond the present growing season,two-thirds of the seed mix shall be composed of perennial grasses. • Temporary or permanent mulch must be uniformly applied by mechanical or hydraulic means and stabilized by disc-anchoring or use of hydraulic soil stabilizers. • All exposed soil areas must be stabilized as soon as possible,but in no case later than 14 days after the construction activity has temporarily or permanently ceased. • Accumulated sediment must be removed from the temporary sedimentation basin prior to final grading and stabilization of the biofiltration basin area. • Slope armoring or other permanent erosion control should be installed on the berm between the forebay and the biofiltration basin. • Applicant shall ensure erosion protection of the biofiltration basin emergency overflow is adequate to prevent scour. 2. Applicant shall review the BCWMC's Requirements for Improvements and Development Proposals-Section 6.2.2 Bioretention System Design and Maintenance Requirements and incorporate and provide design documentation for the following and other appropriate design recommendations. • Biofiltration basins should usually be used on sites with tributary areas less than two acres.When used to treat larger area,they tend to clog.The tributary area to the basin is three acres.We recommend increased sump depth at CBMH2 to 4' and sizing for the entire drainage area or including additional upstream sumps. • Where feasible the biofiltration basin must be designed to pond 6 to 9 inches(the maximum pooling depth may be up to 2 feet if justification for increased depth can be provided). The current design depth of the biofiltration basin is 3 feet. • The bottom of the basin must be graded as flat as possible(1%or less is recommended) to provide uniform ponding and filtration of runoff across the floor.The detail on Sheet C301 allows for a maximum slope of 2%. • The biofiltration basin should be designed as an off-line system to convey high flows around the basin. • Excavation must be performed by equipment with tracks exerting relatively light pressures to prevent the basin floor from being compacted. • The bottom and side slopes of the basin must be stabilized with appropriate plants within seven days following construction. • Install riprap or a splash block at the inlet to the forebay to minimize erosion. 3. The stormwater narrative for the project indicates Type D soils on the site.The HydroCAD modeling uses Type C soils.Applicant should revise and clarify. 4. The BCWMC assumes that planting media and any below-grade storage areas are saturated and therefore does not count this volume as part of the required filtration volume.Applicant should revise the volume calculation for the biofiltration basin to include only the above-grade filtration volume.Applicant should ensure that this volume is adequate to meet the BCWMC requirements. Jeff Oliver December 16,2014 Page 3 5. A maintenance agreement for the biofiltration basin,forebay,and sump manholes should be established between the applicant and the City of Golden Valley. 6. Revised drawings must be provided to the BCWMC Engineer for final review and approval. The drawings we reviewed are dated October 23,2014(C100,C102-C602),October 16,2014(L1-L3), and May 22,2014(C101),If you have questions,please contact me at 952-832-2784 or Candice Kantor at 952-832-2868. Sincerely, )A-11� Jim Herbert, P.E. Barr Engineering Co. Engineers for the Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission(BCWMC) c: Eric Eckman, Golden Valley Dave Nash,EVS, Inc. p:\mpls\23 mn\27\2327051\workfiles\plat reviews\2014\2014-28 laurel pond residential development.docx c m C 21 ya 7 t� EXISTING HOUSES "J cn o.. v _ o Lu < . PARKING U 1-- C/1 = SITTING PENNSYLVANIA AVE SPACE WITH WEST PROPERTY LINE J V BENCHES _ { �� ` L EASEMENT LINE E r 14 1 PRo,ECrmtE: Laurel Ponds One Lu g JO ' 12 spa us J � 7. ►•. r� � X � �' 2 �� aornwir,w� a Z LL 1` I — — 4 t — s NORTH t CL 71 ) I �8 a PROPERTY LINE x W J I!1 I WSHEErTME - ALL ROOF AncwnscrtRAL SM PLM FACING NORTH STORM " a m 1 � � I� PROPERTY LINE W 14 JSrWATER INFILTRATION Uj HIP BASIN z. I 22 r, - °� MIN. SETBACK 21 PpAmo: 01-M4 PARKING — -- EXISTING ROAD OPAYMW 1N IA FUTURE DELIVERY GRASS FIRE NE TURNAROUND CHEM W. wens PARKING ` " _ reelE DAM LANES,2 TOTAL UTURE ADDITIONALx -- GUEST PARKING PARKING SPACE AREA (RESTRICTED) EXISTING BUILDING O 60' irrr.wirrrr 4�rrrr�w�rr'we MASTER PLAN N ® rrrcrrrr �.rre Al eaue�m.�,�tirema.srp�r rcxC r.aam a.uwn� rut r.oam tmr a� tiv� r wrkrdra THE HOUSE NUMBERS SHOWNARE FOR PRELIMINARR.' PLAN PURPOSES ONLY.THE NUMBERS MAY CHANGE WITH THE FINAL PLAT PROCESS -FOR ZONING APPROVAL ONLY Al NOTE:FINAL HOME DESIGNS PRESENTED BY BUILDER MAY DIFFER SLIGHTLY FROM THESE PLANS FINAL PLAT AND DEVELOPMENT PLANS FOR ENGINEERING SURVEYING ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING EVS,INC. 10025 Valley View Road,Suite 140 Eden Prairie,Minnesota 55344 Phone:952-646-0236 Fax 952-646-0290 LAUREL PONDS ON www.-_ng.com Golden Valley , MN FINAL PUD PLANS Presented By: CLIENT Lakewest Development, LLC Lakewest Development, LLC PROJECT Laurel Ponds One LOCATION SHEET INDEX Golden Valley, MN SHEET AREA MAP SHEET DESCRIPTION TITLE SHEET C100 TITLE SHEET C101 EXISTING CONDITIONS C102 REMOVALS,TREE IDENTIFICATION&DEMOLITION PLAN A 5� C201 FINAL SITE PLAN DEC 71 ° C301 FINAL GRADING PLAN > C302 FINAL EROSION&SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN �4. mr C400 OVERALL UTILITIES rrom , S C401 SANITARY&WATERMAIN PLAN&PROFILE-PRIVATE RD # DATE REVISION PROJECT CONTACT LISTA 11/07/2014 CITY REVISIONS R;d "�YR¢ LANDscAPiNG C501 STORM PLAN&PROFILE-PRIVATE RD B 11/25/2014 CITY REVISIONS DEVELOPER Lakewest DevelopmEVS,INC.ent C601 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS C 12/17/2014 24 LOTS SITE PLAN -� 14525 Highway 7,Suite 335 10250 VALLEY VIEW ROAD C Minnetonka,MN 55345 SUITE 123 TEL'.952-930-3000 EDEN PRAIRIE,MN 55344 0602 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS a FAX:952-653-2198 TEL(952)646-0236 haisky �. CONTACT:DONALDJENSEN FAX:(952)646-0290 L1 FINAL LANDSCAPE PLAN WE51 Ringfxprr. EMAIL:donaldj@Iwestdev.com CONTACT:KATHY O'CONNELL T abilities • EMAIL:koconnell@w—ng.com L2 SOUTHERN AREA LANDSCAPE&WATER FEATURE EXHIBIT Q � U CIVIL ENGINEER ARCHITECT _ EVS,INC. WELLS&COMPANY ARCHITECTS L3 LANDSCAPE DETAILS `y > - ;ITE LOCATION 10250 VALLEY VIEW ROAD TEL:612-669-2052 '45 Peo l na Av=nues kO SUITE 123 CONTACT:WILLIAM WELLS y comenvaoey nn 554zs EDEN PRAIRIE,MN 55344 EMAIL:wellsandcompany@yahoo.com A2 PENNSYLVANIA AVE STREET ELEVATIONS AND TYP HOUSE ELEVATION I Ave a Laurel A:e � Laure v l.i:urrl Ave TEL:(952)646-0236 r„ - FAX:(952)W-0290 A3 FRONT HOUSE ELEVATIONS, INTERIOR PRIVATE RD,ST ELEVATIONS PLANS HEREBYCERTIFYSPECIFICATION, THIS CPIs�,.[b'1cHtt9 - CONTACT'DAVE NASH PLAN,SPECIFICATION,OR d EMAIL'.dnash@evs-eng.com REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME a A3.1 FRONT HOUSE ELEVATIONS, INTERIOR PRIVATE RD,ST ELEVATIONS, oRUNDERMY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A LAND SURVEYOR ROOF DORMER OPTION DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL EVS,INC. ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF • 10250 VALLEY VIEW ROAD THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. SUITE 123 A4 REAR HOUSE ELEVATIONS UPGRADE OPTIONS ErgO{rt Americas EDEN PRAIRIE,MN 55344 TEL(952)646-0242 `t FAX:(952)646-0290 David Nash g . CONTACT:MICHAEL WILLIAMS DATE 10/2312014 EMAIL:mwilliams@evs-eng.com REGISTRATION NUMBER 21836 DRAWN BY CHECKED BY VN/ZRE DJN/ZRE DATE PROJECT# 10.23.2014 2011-038.1 SHEET NUMBER 0 IN so ci O O SCALE IN FEET €m •a y ST CB#1.1 m I EXISTING STRUCTURE I' 2 RIM=884.9 EW LD --W.INV.=880.1 ST CB x42.2 (� W I (LOCATED FROM AERIAL IMAGE, HEIGHTS RIM-895.2 w sic9xaz.3 FIELDVERIFyEXACTLOCg70N) ENGINEERING BENCHMARK TNH#115 I S.INV.=880.0 N.INV. 890.5 m Z RIM=895.5 EXISTING STRUCTURE SURVEYING SS MH(x654 886.521 �-ST CB#1.2 N.INV.-890.6 W W S.INV.-892.9 (LOCATED FROAf AERIALJI EXISTING STRUCTURE RIM=884.x- I i RIM-885.3 ; A D D I TI FIELD VERIFY (((��� EXACT LO (LOCATED FROM gERIALI EXISTING STRUC ENVIRONMENTAL _. &. E.INV.-BB0.6 ST MH#42 Q ST CB#42.1 `h'N FIELD VERIFY MAGE, (L TURE N.INV.=871.8 , , EXACT l OCATED F S.INV.= 71.8 „, ��. -� RIM=893.8 12, RIM=896.4 �AnON) FIELD yERI ROM gERIgL IMgGE PLANNING E.INV.=87Q 11 1- - +: ;M,, T ,fit N.INV. 890.0' RCI ST CB 042.4 SS MH#1461 I FY EXACT L ( NW INV.-892.5 OCATION W.INV.-871.2 6"CIP �- i -RIM-897.6 RIM V.89 I EVS,INC. 5 I , RIM-897.8 1 rte 123 ST MH x1 BE INV.=893.8 S.INV.=892. THE LINE OF THE NE 19 OF Eden P to 55344 N.INV..892.7 WEST E 0250 Valley View Road, RIM-884.1 \ ;a _-� - 4 re /4 OF SECTION 5 '� Prairie,n is 962 N.INV.=878.3 --- _ , Phone:952-6646-0236 • � Fax:952.646-0290 S.INV.-8783 ;N} e.IrvsP-zeaos,mx 9'VSP �l www.evs 9 m ' 6'CIP E.INV.-877 ...- , I W.INV.=878.5 12'RCP 12'RC _ ,--� , R I. NNS LVANI AVENU ,�_•��. s CIP 407.915 3T MH#1 - _ j2'RCP_.,. TIM-884.3 EAST ROW I r _ f _ V.INV..879A I P PENNSYLVA-fIA AVENUE 1' '--�^-N5 �^ EXCEPTIO -� Preliminary PUD VE INV.- ° - _ 2.INV.- 9: -------55 -i 38 44 E"6OH RA�' I - -- Preliminary 3.INV.-879.0 tv --- 50 -. - +e #17 p -,...-.__ w $ I W.INV.-879.0 I,•'� `T Q x Q I O x18 j #20 EXCE_TION R " ST CB#1 RIM=883.8 - I a pp \ ayos ® 26 7 N.INV.-880.4 0sti)�s x, Des ,p., '� ?� #2 CLIENT ST CB x1.3 y. In I `+. 3 0s Yn #2 #0 I , RIM=0038 _ o �.Oo p� 31 Lakewest Development S.INV.-880.0 h ^ #14 �e O • 1632 --IRON PIPE W/CAS 1 PROJECT SW INV.. ..I w l ___________, o v I STAMPED - LL I W C 3 �� 17.1 �� c $srry °....... ...., t HOUSE L LaurelPond ar � OT 1 Z 3 08 -tv 92.2 - G LOCATION W g3 � Yr( Iv s(s' TEE U. = Q - F L' O1'.'Z a /� o y�� BUSHES # VEFGolden Valley,MN gIW t0 , ¢ o " A #12 w ds� Uj V - a + ^I a #59 5 1Ts SHEET I un)Z I m O>E O <a 9 O _ a�< o , 72 0, z Q w W I r� �. 29.3 0 8.4 21,3 ===i M.7 Existing Conditions J ZI of x w J r W c g I I 4Q' Q EXISTING B ILDING ro Q I w I Z = a 2:3I ` 't �J 15,957 SOU E FEET $ _ _ 1 -MC > 9.7 d 2 (0 I w a I ee FINISH FLOOR ELEV ION=901.1 FEET m Io Iv # =a a ---� ' 2�C7 yI GARAG A� Z O J 5 W � WaN I o Z WL3 I _ O * °Q 47.1 , - as r- ,� 0 30 60 I vW I • � ._ z X Q #11 X12. 1 --- 55------- 35A�� SCALE IN FEET j I dee ! so LINE IIARALLEL WITH 52 q #1 ---W.LINEOF uS 0 I m O#10 \ O' A m NE 11OF NW 1/4 ro jZ w a 199.10 S a' P.O.B. 0s Z Z s ° O PARCEL B �� I N.LINE OF THE W 250.3'OF THE N j , r{ 97.1 0�ry� 5.100.0'OF THE N.693.88'OF�'b ` I # DATE REVISION �m I ----------- - ;- -- _ EASEMENT FOR THETRgNSMISSION OF '-. - __ ___ NE1/40F NW 1/4 o i a ------ ----- 323 XZ .195 i ELECTRICAL ENERGY PER DOC iS ST MH --- _ 1 INCHED PIPE RIM= .4 I IRON PE EASEMENT FOR TNET -_.Lf� -03212118 ,. ♦ I , P 21N¢W I'lIES-OVEI �C z ELEC "AN OF #cc .1NV. B TRICAL ENERGY PER - -__ - - ------ -, . - InS.INY. 8' NO.3212117 ----657.g7S5°3 rq - _# � 8!:: =6 E.INV. 87 BIW------_._-__ XZw W.INV;=S .4-i - - / w - - m 100.0 LOT 10 -- IST CB#6 CB EEHIV - # _ SS MH#653 RIM=882,7��,,""" SI I V. 88.2 p INV. 907. LOT 11 Pia 0 , RIM=883.4 i14.INV.=8qqq���.5 ""' '• / BL0C�6,�1 N.INV.=889.1 E.INV.-869.0 I�`� II I 8 C EXISTING BUILDING �.``CO P RCEL A BRUSH/ RAN G6 C OLO ,�N \ W.INV.=870.4 8' I TT�� ST CB#5 WORKABILITIES,INC. QIP SECQ .BASS 8 NUE HARRIS RIM=882.7 ` 15'RCP WO LAUREL AVENUE 1 LINE PARALLEL WITH AVENUE SOUTH N.CB#5 - 1s L. i t I' N IINp nF ■LEGEND S.INV.=877.8 I j' GOLDEN VALLEY,MN 55426 Z PROPERTY DESCRIPTION VICINITY MAP 0 SURVEY NOTES 1k CONIFEROUS TATE I HEREBY CERTIFYSPECIFICATION, O THIS Parcel A: � FOUND MorvuMErvT PLAN,SPECIFICATION,OR .-VI - The property address is 305 and 345 Pennsylvania Avenue South,Golden Valley,MN 55426. (SEE TABLE FOR TREE INFORMATION) _ That rt of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 5,Township 117,Range 21,Hennepin County,Minnesota, o BOLLARD/POST REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME 1. The property identification number is 05-117-21-21-0074 and 05-117-21-21-0004. Pa o DECIDUOUS TREE SU UNDER N DIRECT' 2. The property is 144,235 square teat,more or less,or 3.31 acres,more or less. described as follows:Commencing at a point on the East line of said Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter,distant st Qua feet (SEE TABLE FOR TREE INFORMATION) SUPERVISION AND THAT 1 AM A South of the Northeast comer thereof;thence West parallel wit the North line of said Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter STREET SIGN o .. .w4.. 3. The property is located in the city of Golden Valley zoning district 1-394 Mixed Use. BUSH DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL to IM Intersection with a line drawn parallel with and distant North feet East l the west line of said Northeast Quarter art r, ANCHOR ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF j 7 Northwest Quarter as measured along a line parallel with the North lone of sa d Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter,said '� - e.- Building Setbacks 0 POWERPOLE - OVERHEAD ELECTRIC THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Front Yard=75 feet(Nonresidential or Mixed Use) point being the actual point of begmnmg of the tract to be described;W thence North parallel with the West Northeast the Northeast AP T-- From Yard=30 feet(Residential Use adjacent to R7 zoning district) Quarter of the Northwest Quarter a distance of 84.72 feet,thence West parallel with the North line of said Northeast Quarter of the 9 GAS MANHOLE UNDERGROUND GAS From Yard=10 feet(Residential Use) Northwest Quarter a distance of 250.3 feet to the West line of said Quartet Quarter;thence South along the West line Of said O -ro- UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTICS f I quarter-Quarter a distance of 407.915 feet;thence East parallel with the North line of said Quarter-Quarter a distance of 250.3 feet; peu GAS METER Side=50 felt(adpining Ri zoning district) Quarter-Quarter Michael R.Williams Side=10 feet(adpining all other zoning districts) thence North parallel with the West line of said a distance of 323.195 feet to the actual point of beginning ExceptGAS UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE DATE &_221 2014 Rear=50 feet(adjoining R7 zoning district) the Westerly 30 feet thereof,according to the United States Government Survey thereof and situate in Hennepin County,Minnesota. D TEL vAVLE -'-- REGISTRATION NUMBER 44076 L SITE I.OGATION J Rear=10 feet(adjoining all other zoning districts) Parcel B: Q TELEPHONE MANHOLE SANITARY SEWER LINE ti•l�OS(} [! That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 5,Township 117,Range 21,Hennepin County,MI778s58 feet O TELEPHONE PEDESTAL STORM SEWER LINE Parking Setbacks described as follows:Commencing at a point on the East line of said Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, d - j Front 15}eat O SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE STORM SEWER CULVERT South of the Northeast corner the thence West parallel wrth the North line of said Northeast Quartet of the Northwest Quarter DRAWN BY CHECKED BY 3x5 Pcnnay-nia Avenue South Side=15 teat t°its Intersection with a line drawn parallel with and distant 250.30 feet East of the West line of Northeast Quarter Of the Northwest CATCH BASIN(CURB TYPE) WATERMAIN Golsen Valley,MN 55x26 Rear=15 feet Quarter as measured along a line parallel With the North line of said Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter;thence South LCC DJN parallel With said West line of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter a distance of 323.195 feet to the actual point of CATCH BASIN(BEEHIVE) rr EDGE OF VEGEATION ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE IN TERMS OF US SURVEY FEET Impervious Coverage beginning of the land to be herein described;thence South on said parallel line 199.10 feet,more or less,to the South line of Bald ASPHALT SURFACE CONTOURS ARE IN 1 FOOT INTERVALS Maximum=65 percent Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter;thence West along said South line to the West line of said Northeast Quarter of the STORM SEWER MANHOLE DA'L'E PROJECT# HORIZONTAL DATUM 4. Sanitary.Storm,and Water Main structures are numbered per utility plans provided by the City of Golden Valley. No Quarter,thence North along said West line to its intersection with a line drawn parallel with the North line of said Q, GATE VALVE BEARING SYSTEM IS HENNEPIN COUNTY COORDINATE 5. Location of utilities(representative examples Of which are listed below)existing on or serving the surveyed property as Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter from the actual point Of beginning;thence East to the actual point Of beginning.Except CONCRETE SURFACE 5.22.2014 2011-038.1 ORIENTATION OF THIS BE b HYDRANT SYSTEM,SOUTHERN ZONE NAD83.1996, determined by observed evidence together with evidence from plans obtained from utility companies or provided by client, the Westerly 30 feet and the Southerly 50 feet thereof,according to the United States Government Survey thereof and situate in VERTICAL DATUMBENCHMARK and markings by Wilhy companteS and other appropriate sources.The surveyor does not warrant that the underground Hennepin County,Minnesota. a POST INDICATOR VALVE CURB AND GUTTER TOP NUT OF HYDRANT 114 utilities shown hereon,I any,are in the exact location as indicated,although the surveyor does ceAity that they are ELEVATION=886.196 FEET located as accurately as possible from information available.The surveyor makes no guarantees that the underground parcel C: WATER MANHOLE [LOCATED ON LAUREL AVENUE APPROXIMATELY 325 FT.EASTOF THE utilities shown comprise all such utilities in the area,either in service or abandoned.The surveyor has not physically SHEET NUMBER INTERSECTION OF LAUREL AVENUE/PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE) located the underground utilities.Utilities are shown to Level D and Level C.Pursuant to ms 216A contact Gopher State The West 250.3 feet of the South 100.0 feet of the North 693.86 feet of the Northeast Quartet of th<Northwezt Quarter.Except the TOP NUT OF HYDRANT 115 One Call at 651-454-0002 prior to any excavation.Underground utilities as shown are based upon available maps and Westerly 30 feet thereof,Hennepin County,Minnesota. C 1 0 1 ELEVATION=086.521 locates by utility locators from Gopher State One Call ticket no.111603156.The locators may have or may not have NOTE:The property description for Parcel C above was taken from an abbreviated version per the Hennepin County Tax Department. (LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF LAUREL AVENUE/PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE) located all underground utilities. 6. Field work was completed on June 24,2011. ELEVATION PROVIDED BY THE CITY of GOLDEN VALLEY 7 A portion of the improvement and topographical features on Parcel 3 were not field located. 8. Existing Parking stalls is 101 stalk i ST CS#1.1 I m EXISTING STRUCTURE U 2 RIM=884.9 E W LD ST CB#42.2 (�W I (LOCATED FROM AERIAL IMAGE, W.INV.-880.1 HEIGHTS RIM=895.2 W ST CB#42.3 FIELD VERIFY EXACT LOCATION) / S.INV. 8W N.INV.SW.51 CO Z rRIM=895.5 I EXISTING STRUCTURE I EXISTING STRUCTURE I ENGINEERING SURVEYING STCB#1.2 N.INV. 890.6 I W W S.INV.=892.9 FlELDVERIFYEX.gCTLAERIO-'7'N IE FROM I��INGS ENVIRONMENTAL :Y E.INV.-880.6 I ADDI71 EXAC LO IMAGE, TED FROMCNRE RIM�6 J I C3 Q s7 ce 042.1 I N ) ) FIELD VERIFY PLANNING LOCATION AERLLL IMAGE N.INV.=890.0 it CP RIM=896.4 RI MH 04.3 EXACT LO `�" ,..r r •'. ( NW INV.=892.5 STCB#42.4 RIM=904.3 I CATION) 1\ 66,ClpP\ 1) RIM-897.6 WES UNE I 10025 Valley View Road,Suite 140 N.INV.-892.7 EVS,INC. 1 BE INV.-893.8 OF THE NE 1/4 OF / 9 1 S.INV.-892.4 THE W a -' - •\ \ I A 1/4 OF SECTION 5� I Eden Prairie,Minnesota 55341 Phone:952-046-0236 Fax:952-646-0290 .- www.evseng.com ��. _ 12'RCP tr RC _ I I I I I tl, I r °' / \ \ r+-�-e- 407. 15 - y EAST ROW - I \ \ EOR \\\ > I r � PENNSYLVANIA ; p-� \ I \ � / \ 1 I I \\ \- \\ \ _ FINAL PUD PLANS 19 i #zo #19 \ FIELD LOCATE&PLUG A _ ^,EXISTING WTER 7 AND\ �s�\\ \ 6 / // _-- _ _ -_ =_C___ I 13PI I J`�s �$j I �10/s ,o� 1 SANITARY SERVICESi CLIENT FOR PROPOSED USES I J,o pm e I Lakewest Development,LLC // NPIPE � a ( 17.7// I I I I I PROJECT Lll 41' I 1 1 /J ILS. I I a =_ \ I II I I \\dry J 1 1 11 I \I\) :3 � a. Laurel Ponds One mA a 6 , A _ \ 1 1 1 !I / I I I I (LOC LOCATION BUSHES 1ELI 21 I I I I I I I BASEMENT FIELI Z t-- o _ ,5 Golden Valley,MN W L�C1 w \ O g/ / 1 I I I I I I I I 60.0 _ �• I I // /�/I I SHEET azl .;O 72.0 `` I�Ii // � � �1 ¢ ui¢ � I � I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I n \ N 293 I /-� '^_ S 6 wl Removals, a C_ m 16.4 Tree Preservation& J o 1 u I I �( & > 1 ¢ \I I .� A EXISTING B ILDING ro I I I 1 qe Z ( O> I I I I I I \ 15,957 SOU EFEET I�I //� \\S+N> I _ LLa , Il -9� llf I I # I\ o Demolition Plan � ( � 3 \ > I 1 1 ( I I ( I I \ FINISH FLOOR ELEV ION=901.1 FEET m I I I I I A �' I II 1 1� I RAGE LU ; w I SII X�" Z \ 3 l } ° ( \ I I `� , I 't f, .ate;. 47.1 v D� `��d- es' \ ;�/ �.� #1t 1 1 III I I I I I 1 $ �\ 1 J 1 55 I so / LINE FIARALLEL WITH / /5 4}8s 1 1 I 'C�s / I I W.LINE C. SALV GE IF 1 ^ �- I I 1\� r �a7 G I POS IS LE/ NE 1/ OF NW 1/4 I /� I / W #10 I �s m' I IIII \ w Z z `__ __ __ `/� \ �FNR ,@� \�- _`-��-►-.�`__ rte\ ` / / / /9 I I I N. ME OF THE W 250.3'OF THE j (/I Z i i �� 97.1 6, (IIII I I �5.100.0'OF NEEI/40FiNW 10/4°' !l III�Z IHETBALV i - /ter. / / / w # DATE REVISION yQ 1218 \ °, _ -/ e q r I 1 11 II I U /PINCHED PIPE /-- l l l 1I MM- .0 A 11/07/2014 CITY REVISIONS �OfE,XIS C[/1/�""� ELECTRICAL ENERGY pRDMISSION I OC.N0.3212117 ��-- \ \ �_ - - (10( B 11/25/2014 CITY REVISIONS 97$rJ' 8�44=� -� __\ \ I \ � � / , // I / F C 12/17/2014 24 LOTS SITE PLAN -- / - - \ -- --/100.0 \///// LOT 10 rIN ( 9DLFOF THEXIS_'hNG RETAINING WALL IS SEPARATING _ ------- PROTECT EXISTING "".7�,�"" 86g2 � _-_ 7T ;,ooqq��++.5 ) r- AN AREA ON THE NEIGHBOR EXSTING PARKING LO SHALL q REFER TO SITE&GRADING PLAN SHEETS N CO RD NATION REMOVE -- \\ _ �"906 _ \ ILT FENCE LOCATION. `� �� ��(`�(-")-� SHRUBS.REFER TO C302 89.4 dt.y I BE DESIGNATED WITHIN AN EASEMENT AS NON-BUSINESS 4 -_\ \ - = I A Y \\ F\ .q \HOURS ONLY(TOWABLE)GUEST PARKING.TO BE OUTLINED WITH STRUCTURAL PLANS FOR EXTENT ;IMPROVEMENTS. \\ \ UILVERT �\ 'seo\��\P:O.B� --993 �RL �j\VEER\ - COLIC L PER AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE PROPERTY OWNERS. EXISTING BUILDING y(`VV \ \ \ \\ =E- _ N �\ `,��\`-_ 1__= ; �,_ RING, C ITION , j• l / I Zo STALLS ARE GENERALLY OUTLINED HERE. _- - - _ \ / I _ \ SECO J.BASS&MARLA ENUESHARRIS \ / / U z- WORKABILITIES,INC. \!)�P l i� �- NO 70 CONTRACTOR: 01 v 15'RCP/ 6. w y u~y o 7400 LAUREL AVENUE \ \ --TREES OFFSITE MAY BE REMOVED AS m EGON AVENUE SOUTH / I w NEEDED FOR CONSTRUCTION PER THE m N VALLEY,MN 55426 I ,SAnII a 0: GOLDEN VALLEY.MN 55428 J w EIGHBORS'APPROVAL.CONTACT PRO I o z _8g < �' / I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS 1 \ ` \ NAGER FOR ADDITIONAL DIRECTION. g m E.LINE O E 1/4 OF PIAN,SPECIFICATION,OR TREE IDENTIFICATION TABLE&SCHEDULE \-592---- `gg== -_ ,_-RE - - c NW 1/4 BE .5- REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME _� 1 /� m SU UNDER N DIRECT STATUS# SPECIES DIAMETER STATUS REPLACE # SPECIES DIAMETER REMOVE REPLACE TOTAL CALIPERS(IN.)IN SURVEY=1,111 -__ _ _- ��1 I SUPERVISION AND THAT 1 AM A 1 GREEN ASH 11" REMOVE 2 31 SUGAR MAPLE 9" REMOVE 2 1 I 778.58 DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL 7.7 2 RIVER BIRCH 15" REMOVE 2 32 SUGAR MAPLE 11' REMOVE 2 TOTAL CALIPERS(IN.)ON SITE=1,023 - NE COR.OF NE 11401C. ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF I.7 I I 3 RIVER BIRCH 10" REMOVE 2 33 SUGAR MAPLE 9" REMOVE 2 TOTAL REMOVED ON SITE(IN.)=88% NW 1/4 SEC.5 ` THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 4 GREEN ASH 9" REMOVE 2 34 SUGAR MAPLE 11' REMOVE 2 TOTAL TREES IN SURVEY=61 \ 5 GREEN ASH 11" REMOVE 2 35 SUGAR MAPLE 10" REMOVE 2 TOTAL TREES ON SITE=58 6 GREEN ASH 6' REMOVE 2 36 SUGAR MAPLE T REMOVE 2 I 7 CHERRY 6" REMOVE 2 37 SUGAR MAPLE 7" REMOVE 2 TOTAL TREES REMOVED ON SITE=49 David Nash REMOVE 2 38 SUGAR MAPLE 9" REMOVE 2 DATE 1012312014 8 HACKBERRY 6' 3g SUGAR MAPLE 10' TOTAL REMOVED ON SITE PERCENTAGE=84% 9 JUNIPER 20'DRIP LINE REMOVE 2 REMOVE 2 LEGEND REGISTRATION NUMBER 21836 REMOVE 4 40 BLUE SPRUCE 20' REMOVE 2 10 COTTONWOOD 42' 41 BLUE SPRUCE 20' 11 COTTONWOOD 36" REMOVE 4 42 BLUE SPRUCE 15" REMOVE 2 ALLOWABLE TREE REMOVAL(#): Q PROTECT TREE 12 COTTONWOOD 48' REMOVE 4 43 COTTONWOOD 60" REMOVE 2 ALLOWABLE=47.5% ® PROTECT EXISTING RETAINING WALL 13 COTTONWOOD 48' REMOVE 4 44 BLUE SPRUCE 15" REMOVE 2 Q REMOVE TREE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY 14 COTTONWOOD 48" REMOVE 4 ACTUAL=84% ® REMOVE BUILDING AND ANCILLARY STRUCTURES 15 COTTONWOOD 32' REMOVE 4 45 BOX ELDER 6 TRUNKS,EACH AT 4'SAVE 46 BLUE SPRUCE 13' REMOVE 2 REPLACEMENT=36.5%->45 TREES x 36.5%=16 © REMOVE STAIRS VN/ZRE DJN/ZRE 16 COTTONWOOD 32' REMOVE 4 47 DECIDUOUS 24" REMOVE 2 (FROM LARGEST REMOVED TO SMALLEST) (1) PROTECT EXISTING SERVICES TO BE USED. 17 COTTONWOOD 32' REMOVE 4 48 ASH 18' REMOVE 2 (IF EXISTING SERVICE IS NOTTO BE USED,REMOVE BACK TO MAIN AND PLUG.) 18 GREEN ASH 28' REMOVE 4 qg DECIDUOUS 24' REMOVE 2 �.1 REMOVE LENGTH OF EXISTING SERVICE&PLUG 10 FT FROM R/ONJ FOR PROPOSED USE. DATE PROJECT# 19 GREEN ASH 32" REMOVE 6 50 DECIDUOUS 12" SAVE REPLACEMENT PER CATEGORY B: Uf REMOVE PAVEMENT SECTION(SEE C401) 20 GREEN ASH 28' REMOVE 4 51 DECIDUOUS 8' SAVE NUMBER REQUIRED=60 ® BITUMINOUS CUT(SEE C401) 10.23.2014 2011-038.1 21 SUGAR MAPLE 9" REMOVE 2 SAVE REMOVE 2 52 DECIDUOUS 12' SAVE NUMBER PROPOSED=69 22 SUGAR MAPLE 10' REMOVE 2 53 DECIDUOUS 15" 23 SUGAR MAPLE 8' 54 DECIDUOUS 18" SAVE TREE REPLACEMENT REQUIREMENTS ARE MET. 24 SUGAR MAPLE 12' REMOVE 2 55 DECIDUOUS 18" SAVE REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR REPLACE SIZE, SHEET NUMBER 25 SUGAR MAPLE 17 REMOVE 2 56 DECIDUOUS 12" SAVE SPECIES AND LOCATION. 26 SUGAR MAPLE 12" REMOVE 2 REMOVE 2 57 DECIDUOUS 18' SAVE 0 30 60 28 SUGAR SUGAR MAAPLE 10' REMOVE 2 PLE 15 58 DECIDUOUS e" SAVE C1 02� DECIDUOUS 18" SCALE IN FEET 29 SUGAR MAPLE 10' REMOVE 2 60 DECIDUOUS 18" SAVE 30 SUGAR MAPLE 8' REMOVE 2 61 MAPLE 60" REMOVE 6 F i C c: AME000, M m 0 ENGINEERING SURVEYING M ENVIRONMENTAL 1 OO • n PLANNING EVS,INC. 10025 valley View Road,Suite 140 NEW PAVEMENT AND CURB d G FOR UTILITY vv Eden Prairie,Minnesota 55344 _ CONNECTIONS(TyP, IJI?'5'I'�'U Phone:952-646-0236 Fax:952646-0280 - — — �qyy OUI REI,IQ�ANn.��� • wArw.evs�ng.com PENNSYLVANIA AVE ry COMMERCIAL,CROSS SIDEWALK GUTTER DRIVEWAY( Op) COMMERCIAL� � — I va -4 IDEWALK — — COMMERCIAL CROSS 10' -NO OUTLET \STOP SIGN PRO GUT-TER DRIVEWAY (CCG 45 � I —�. I'G PER Mn T — UGHTI�tK3E � rsl EwALK D) - - - FINAL PUD PLANS © �'� rSIDEWALK qq 1 2Y —� I 'ONE WAY' SIGN ' OUTLOT I? I WO / / /I^t yl ' f � — -ONE WAY- 1 y I� II — CA yl CLIENT 09,a 4? siLakew est Development,LLC � SLID LO PROJECT 2 �r�—s- - �� 24 w0 Laurel Ponds One 1 a _ I� T __BB' N F- 8j� I =- —_-__� '' II -- -- ---� I �' 1p I� I I I I is it I I`--- ------I I —�_—�I LOCATION M �; I f-- t I i I l we �— ! I !I to I I I Imo-- Golden Valley, MN r %z ' I I ! L 5w "�� I --_ ----�I I !I LOT' SHEET wo ! — — -- ---—I 23 ' I _ — s — I� ill Final Site Plan m Owe 54.3 I l I I I 1 - TUG/SLO R H� — I 19 56 I I �°— I ! LG I I 11 ---_—_— I �+-- -6- TUG/SLO I 4 �i J I ^_�- — I - --- L 1. -— —_-- .— I 2213 l�I� L40aye: I �0 1 I SWO l I 20 I � I � I I !nese _ _I+ J ` I !; SWG 0 i I' �; 2 I i I," WO \ I II 1 SIDEWALK J TUG/SLO ( — —p—PR OF OF pgRKING m RETAINING WALL 'N" — — # DATE REVISION RETAINING W r 21-------- _ m �Z A 11/07/2014 CITY REVISIONS I (FUTURE VARIANCE) ---- ---- SIDEWALK a B 11/25/2014 CITY REVISIONS ----- ---------- -----nW--------.--_--- --- L --_ I TE MPORARYBITUMINOUS 24 If DROP CURB REMOVED AND REPLACED gppgpX 3r ROOF OF — C12/17/201424 LOTS SITE PLAN CONSTRUCTION EXIT SHALL 90 LF OF STRUCTU a BE REINFORCED TURF WHEN (SEE DETAI RAL RETAINING WALL PARKld4 CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES. �) (REFER TO STRUCTURAL PLAM SET,) —_ 3Q'y SIGNAGE NON.SUC I edJ® 'NO PARKING RE NJ NG W S0 BETWEEN SIGNS- SIGNAGE Or PER MnDOT 'NO PARKING 9 BETWEEN SIG 2s PER MnDOT 'w I LEGEND SINGLE FAMILY SITE DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY NOTES ® PROPOSED BITUMINOUS PAVING GROSS SITE= 3.31 Ac I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION,OR 1. DIMENSIONS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST TENTH FOOT AND PROPOSED HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVING NUMBER OF LOTS= 24 LOTS REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME ARE TO BACK OF CURB AND EXTERIOR FACE OF BUILDING UNLESS (MATCH EXISTING SECTION) REQUIRED DENSITY= MAX 10.12 U/AC SU UNDER N DIRECT NOTED OTHERWISE. PROPOSED DENSITY= 7.3 U/AC SUPERVISION AND THAT I ONA PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK 0 30 60 DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL 2. CONCRETE SUPPLIERS ARE REQUIRED TO HAUL CONCRETE WASTE I LOT SUMMARY ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF AND WASH OFF-SITE. —.. PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENT SCALE IN FEET THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 3476 SF MINIMUM LOT AREA POSED REINFORCED TURF GRASS PAVE MIN LOT WIDTH 36 FT 3. EXISTING STRIPING ON POWERS BLVD AT TAKE DRIVE WILL NEED PROOR APPROVED EQUAL. MINIMUM M LOT DEPTH 97FT TO BE CHANGED TO ACCOMMODATE TURN LANES,EXISTING ELI- ,I-I- STRIPING SHALL BE OBLITERATED BY GRINDING OR David Nash TIPOUT CURB(ACROSS FROM LOW POINTS) SANDBLASTING.NEW STRIPES SHALL BE LATEX WITH 6"EDGE LINE. TS) SETBACKS DATE 1012312014 LAUREL AVE 30 FT 4H'r� I I REGISTRATIONTION21 NUMBER $38 4. ALL CONCRETE CURB SHALL BE SURMOUNTABLE UNLESS — — — — STRUCTURE SETBACK PENNSYLVANIAAVE 20 FT FROM DRIVE SLE OTHERWISE NOTED. _ — — EASEMENT LINE FRONT YARD 5 FT SIDE YARD 15 FT •/ I 3M' 5. DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED AS REAR YARD •"t• • •'t o• DRAWN BY CHECKED BY REQUIRED.DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS WILL BE PROVIDED a STREET LIGHT-PROPOSED FIXTURE MOUNTED MINIMUM DRIVE ISLE TWO WAY(PARKING ON ONE SIDE) 24 FT B TO e p •,: V`!1 ••A .0--- MINIMUM DRIVE ISLE ONE WAY(PARKING ON ONE SIDE) 20 FT B TO B �7 —L— OVER ALL PUBLIC UTILITIES AND UP TO ONE(1)FOOT ABOVE THE ON EXISTING POWER POLE MINIMUM DRIVE ISLE ONE WAY(NO PARKING) 16 F7 B 70 8 m �^. �� .�.•' VN I ZRE DJN/ZRE HIGH WATER LEVEL OF ALL PONDS. a STOP SIGN ••• •• ` m �,••, • :r •t 6. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE TRAFFIC CONTROL ALONG ZONING DROP CURB AT EMERGENCY ACCESS DATE PROJECT# PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE DURING CONSTRUCTION. + STREET SIGN OPENINGS.(1RANSIRON TO BE MADE _-17,55•• 10.5' EXISTING ZONING -394 MIXED USED FAMILY RESIDENTIAL(R-1,PUD IN3FTJ 26" 1,23.2014 2011-038.1 7. CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY CIN BEFORE WORK BEGINS IN ® "BASIN BUFFER"SIGN(LOCATION TBD) PROPOSED ZONING PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE. PARK MONUMENT SIGN(LOCATION TBD) PARKING(ONSITE) DROP CURB SECTION SURMOUNTABLE CURB SECTION PROPOSED GUEST DESIGNATED STREET PARKING STALLS PROVIDED=12 C2O1 VU0 WALKOUT PROPOSED GUEST STREET PAR KING STREET AVAILABLE=12- CZO1 SHEET NUMBER PROOF OF PARKING STALLS SHOWN=6 129 AC (39%) LO LOOKOUT EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA 1 72 AC. (52%) C201 R RAMBLER NOTE:PERCETAGE OF THE SITE THAT IS PROPOSED TO BE IMPERVIOUS FALLS UNDER THE PERCENTAGE ALLOWED IN THE REZONED PROPERTY. S SLO I SWO SIDE LOOKOUT I SIDE WALKOUT _71 TUG TUCK UNDER GARAGE 9 i AMR001, -15 I O T \ 5 I _ ENGINEERING SURVEYING ----- , \\��\ \ +� ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING ENS,INC. 10025 Valley View Road,Suite 140 --F- :��1 a X1III 7 i \B' I �q // ,'_.a`n% !\``f'�r!�'b`I -.4`9.Y`._ .I..._<- _ . .�_!.3�`.G-Ya�iI � -I -->_<t'ekf'5�8I7'1___-,I i---_-II/ -I/� ''' -'If-_.,I\ �-,-1 t--;_\�\� 1/'_�c9f4.2~Ia-' -��iI -_\{\•',� ---` Eden Prairie,Minnesota L 1 /® Phone:952-646-024346 m46 -1- Fax:952-646-0290 -�-.ti \II ` AQ�I II ill , 20 _ 1 - -- IRV - 19,0.1 B• _� ----_-- II ----_ G"G I I© i 6 T 1,j a , I Ir. /l� \ , aiQ 22_t0 /FP ;` _�J Jet,, I --- -- -- ---- I l iF''v � � , 1 1 ; //� �� w�N Iw I m I ,�9oaa. �F- ` �r�' C' -�= - •�,,,_---- _�1 - -t FINAL PUD PLANS / Oo I I i �- . / _� 887 f y� /� Iu I yI�,I IwfO7/� A \ N O\ \ I I 91QQ1GL �g9 _. r I WO \ I_ 1 \\ 1 Ai I x-8,10-I-I� V�,, I LFE \ I a J m woIs SI - 903.9Gi 1 \ _„, I 111 E 2tpnp2 _ _.,_' \ ' JL' /� ,�) 11111 5 .1_ _,- I CLIENT 5 / �-- ` i /�/ ''1/V I ,r�5 y I / j l 1 I I , ,� � � III �, I LII� � , I/ ,- - �_ Sc .fcL � � �S ..�.`5�,1 I I Lakewest Development, LLC 5��7 '.2 ' I 1 �p I L �_IJI {I I > 1 11 m '� ' \ , - 12, i I I I I sz f�S.f ,�4i'/ 1p 1 OI 1^ I'1 I I LFE 89$. I L. 1 i I y , -�--91 0 ' II'I; i PROJECT + I i,I ro I I / �{ + LFE 898.9 I X `f I I N !I I i i I IPi / R I I r / I I ' 90 I III! \� IL. 4EI01.5 I a 11 �• � `--- 0 1 j .V�I / _1 ` r• ( ' ' _ O II I I O l l l l X 1 1 I I o se /�T\ �+ 1e I m' _ I I J T 11 I Laurel Ponds One B I F'I� \/ 71 I ' I / 'r11, j LOCATION 9.2 O 1 t�8X r( I I I $ \I / It 32G _ Ss�- yc II 1 Es 1.8 I N �; ) ►� wj I 1 I I I I I I I, Golden Valley,M \ ���I / IJ- to � I I LFE -1: I j I1 ; rt -- 7 ie -----C�I�II�yI, ,iI i ! I j/ . i i y \LF�E�"��,r8���87 I I I ! it yy a X-t I I p�_pi'1 I \ R -��I �a �.�. �4`l Ili 1 n111 G� O 1. G.\ X15 511 e I I I\ III \ I \ FE-9�.�1 t I--'_,. SHEET 4---_ i i �� 1 II1,�_ 4 1 I I , \ I I \ 1 3 2R L jl J ,I 11 / 'j\\ - ` I I s I '\' I f 1 l I^ I II I Nro 1 ( i i lit LFE\'9p8.5 ,� y�� 32 1 III I ����L \515`,� Final Grading Plan g '�C 11 - `, I OD 1 f �a 1 I` I I , 1IA! '1 I lie ' - 2 I `I I IL..___ I j A G i i 7 Gy. I.I I I I I.. I._..1..... L ''�tJ._.-�fL l 1 I\\III ----.•fie-. I ;61 m e \ ? 1 - not FI 6.5 HI / I 1 I -L 4107 c I tFE 9pg 2 a�I 9 I I I j I_I II I \ \ I ' IV 4 II �x i L� -:1- _1 -I -1 'I __ G 58 I 1 I $L , _ � 1 1 t / � " LFE 98.1 TI 2 , w LFg 887 -) -- X T. F�,� I 11 T / 1 \ 1 1, m l el 1 111 1 \ BW \901.5 1 4 A" I 1 I I I I f_ I 1.T J .I� I . * /\ / �?�' 43R �..}- ,- � g +l-RIPRAP�EOF I� 0� I 40' a ff5 11 1 II 11, 11� I ll 11\ I 1}� \ 0s� I �� I I I 11.. [ I I FE8 V .70 �- •1 f�l; 82 6 ' -I 1 ! I l ly� 1, \ W Iib \ 1 ! i _1 11 \ GII II \ 20 I 1 11 I /�-j � �.8-- --1•"` /Il l ( 7.2 (ADJUST AS NECESSARY&FIELD FIT AS TO , `\ !`f LSSSA \1 �y`\`Nll�\\L $WO`- �, IID LA \LFA,898.9 /i ' `�, 1=-+-3.5 \' I fN 1II o L9Wp II 1 i. i. 11 1 1 1 II 1 b nl ,G 1 �f L,._. 811. G 1\\\ 1 V , WO �0,S I NOT OBSTRUCT PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS)-W .. ` 888 A�b\�4 \ \� �_ 1Ly1-ISI' I Jyy `, 1 �t�,t 0 1 11 III' ( '^• - J ���\`�\ SBW +'.�_ 7- \ Ji \ \ �-• / '-L - I �, - +.- l I /� D1 Se. 0 I I - _ __ 844 yj�W, -�/ 981.18Gti L \ IF90 _ _ •I 1 m �q(� s.aT of � x 1 1 / � I // L9oo.a e o -Qg-ape fof. L� y �10r � 'I 8813&� 885Tw5 888 -- ``_-='�'`` '� �� \\ `` FP`` _ rAN Y • A \- / q1 /\may' 1 I II/I I/ 884 BW* 855 BW` � _ __ _ ._� - - .e \\llII raT9r f92e__ _ --'- -_----EXISTING RETAINING WALL IMPROVEMENTSJ\�8 \\\ \ \ \ \ """� 1" f�� ff7.3C� /, _ # DATE REVISION f i / A 11/07/2914 CITY REVISIONS - RAL PLANS ,\,I DESIGN_-- \` \\ \I _ _ ------� /' REFER TO STRUCTU ` `\���--_--- ----�� 1�. `wa --- --_-_---- _ ' '1 I B 11/25/7A14 CITY REVISIONS `\` \\\\ 1` '\ \ \\\\ \\� --=_`/\� \`� o = --� C 12/17/2014 24 LOTS SITE PLAN 0 30 60 - - -- .I GRADING NOTES LEGEND PLANS YC RTIFYFICATI N,OHAT THIS t. PROPOSED CONTOURS ARE TO FINISHED SURFACE ELEVATION.SPOT ELEVATIONS ALONG PLANTING MEDIUM NOTE: PLAN,SPEC S PREPARED OR PROPOSED CURB DENOTE FLOWLINE GRADE. 12'MIN DEPTH OF PLANTING MEDIUM REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME WELL BLENDED UNCOMPACTED HOMOGENIUS MIXTURE: SU UNDER N DIRECT 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO AVOID PROPERTY DAMAGE TO 7096 SAND(FINE FILTER AGGREGATE MNDOT 3149.2)OR AASHTO M6) SUPERVISION AND THAT LAMA ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASES OF THIS PROJECT.THE DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL EXISTING CONTOUR CONTRACTOR WILL BEHELD SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGES TO THE ADJACENT -� 3D%COMPOST(GRADE 2 MNDOT) ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF PROPERTIES OCCURRING DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASES OF THIS PROJECT. (EXTEND TO MIN ZONE 2 BOUNDARY AS SHOWN) Zone 3 THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 3, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE THE SITE GRADING CONSTRUCTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH -----_ PROPOSED CONTOUR Sideslope 3:1 Max I I THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OWNERS SOILS ENGINEER.ALL SOIL TESTING SHALL BE COMPLETED $Od Of Seetl Native or Turf I Zone 1 BY THEOWNERS SOILS ENGINEER,THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING SPOT ELEVATIONS: Min 1.0'above HWL Undulating Bottom 5-10'Width from Draintile Location ALL REQUIRED SOIL TESTS AND INSPECTIONS WITH THE SOILS ENGINEER. 4"Pea faVel filter David N]Sh Vegetation Plant with Seed Mix 310 or 325(native)Max Slope 2%. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAINING TRAFFIC CONTROL (Ply/B W)RETAINING WALL af0und tlfatntlle I I See Plan for Approx.Boundary.Draintile to routes to DATE 101231207/ DEVICES SUCH AS BARRICADES,WARNING SIGNS.DIRECTIONAL SIGNS,FLAGMEN AND LIGHTS TO (FF) FINISHED FLOOR Re(er l0 Landecape Plan OCS(typical). REGISTRATION NUMBER 21835 CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC WHERE NECESSARY,TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL 915 0 TW (OIhelWlse Seed ds IMIICaIed in I CONFORM TO APPROPRIATE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARDS. �915.O BW (G) FINISHED GRADE Planting Medium(See Note) Ihls delell%an View nOle) ! 5. THETREESAND OTHER NATURAL VEGETATION WITHIN THE PROJECT ANDIOR ADJACENT TO THE (B) BITUMINOUS 1 PROJECT ARE OF PRIME CONCERN TO THE CONTRACTORS OPERATIONS AND SHALL BEA -915.0 B' (C) CONCRETE _ Filler blit un d e. I Category 3 Erosion ano up Blanket RESTRICTED AREA. TOPROTECT THE TREES WHICH ARE TO BE SAVED TO BE (GL) GUTTER LINE BASIN BOTTOM installed on bottom and up to the HWLO( DRAWN BY CHECKED BY SURETHAT THE EQUIPMENT IS NOT NEEDLESSLY OPERATED UNDER NEARBY TREES AND SHALL (TL`) TOP BACK OF CURB I ARIES-I unless of down emergencyddescribed Withoverip path VN/ZRE DJN/ZRE EXERCISEEXTREME CAUTION IN NARKING ADJACENT TO TREES.SHOULD ANY PORTION OF THE (.) MATCH EXISTING 6"DRAINTL I of Fabric I I unless otherwise described with rip rap. TREE BRANCHES REQUIRE REMOVAL TO PERMIT OPERATION OF THE CONTRACTORS EQUIPMENT, on side slopeS with bulled edge. HE SHALL OBTAIN THE SERVICES OF A PROFESSIONAL TREE TRIMMING SERVICE TO TRIM THE ( DATE PROJECT# TREES PRIOR TO Wo THE BEGINNING OF OPERATION.SHOULD THE CONTRACTORS OPERATIONS WALKOUT Zone 2 RESULT IN THE BREAKING OF ANY LIMBS,THE BROKEN LIMBS SHOULD BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY ,�-VARIES-- 10.23.2014 2011-038.1 { \ / Max Side lope 33 AND CUTS SHALL BE PROPERLY PROTECTED TO MINIMIZE ANY LASTING DAMAGE TO THE TREE,NO LOOKOUT Seed Mix 310 of 328(native) TREES SHALL BE REMOVED WTHOUTAVTHORILSTION BY THE ENGINEER.COSTS FOR TRIMMING LO \ - / VIEW SERVICES SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO THE CONSTRUCTION AND NO SPECIAL PAYMENT SECTION WLLSEMADE. R RAMBLER not to scale PLAN VIEW 8, IF THE CONTRACTOR ENCOUNTERS ANY DRAIN TLE WITHIN THE SITE,HE OR SHE SHALL NOTIFY not to Scale SHEET NUMBER THE ENGINEER WITH THE LOCATION,SIZE,INVERT AND IF THE TILE LINE IS ACTIVE.NO ACTIVE.TILE $LO/SWO SIDE LOOKOUT/SIDE WALKOUT SHALL BE BACKFILLED WITHOUT REVIEW DISCUSSION AND APPROVAL FROM THE PROJECT BIOFILTRATION BASIN(TYP) C301 ENGINEER. SL SPLIT LEVEL 1 7. ALL RETAINING WALLS TALLER THAN 4 FEET SHALL BE DESIGNED BY A STRUCTURAL ENGBIEER, NOT TO SCALE 8. MAXIMUM SLOPE TO BE 3:1.CATEGORY 3 EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS ON SLOPES OVER 3:1. TUG TUCK UNDER GARAGE J 9, MINIMUM DRIVEWAY SLOPE SHALL BE 2%,MAXIMUM DRIVEWAY SLOPE SHALL BE IO%. Il I QUEB�C j I AVE I. I. � IAE900001 ENGINEERING SURVEYING ENVIRONMENTAL l PLANNING EVS,INC. �T —•-•J- - I - _ I I \i \\ \\ >a — --_�_ 10025 Valley View Road,Suite140 I ^•�� /y�, Eden Prairie,Minnesota 55344 \ -r �r�,__I �V/"l• I/ •/ A\kE I , \ /' Phone:952-646-0236 Fax:952-646-0290 \ I 11 I \I I / i IIS N i I` \x I o�� __ I-- - s10- -;77\_- \' FINAL PUD PLANS Wp r i i y +— 7� I i I � +•9,� \ ( \ � \ 090 I � \ a� , as\ �\ I I---`I � I-/ I--- _ °' r))II�` � I I I I / I d I I 17 I I 1 / � , � , ' ; I I I� '\ j(��- _ _ ��- f l; _ `° W QQ I I / II 1 I I I I I t I ' j \ ,i-� / +'I� I �1 �- J-7� ! l� /_ /J/1/ l�/ / I °i( �I� V I I I CLIENT I I I 14 I rte= / _ �L I I l T- 0.- - - / i t I I L 1 I I I I /�///, , )J I,i i, Lakewest Development LL Q I �� h fes- - -- - J I I I J >� 101 I I �I i $ 15 �I I �/- PROJECT J ,� I I I I� T— - la� I I I 1 1 j 7 f w% I R I I �) 18 �_- �� /IJ1I 5 III j ICE �. y I y L'00� I Laurel Ponds One I I I m If I I �L I I I IRI I I/ I —{- - ( - I - I (� LO- y I' fll�i I�Y I I I i, (I JI,Jam\ LOCATION ,�\ II\\ i i \Vito QJ / I I iI .�-I"Y�/_, �� _'_.'I I II I•I , I II II I U/iI iI-,I 6)-I 1Ir�It� I _ I Golden Valley,, MN �� u `s> \14 I I I ` I I I I, I a-�#_��� �� j \ \ SHEET IB � I III I I � i I -'�'�`'-C- 1\ \ \ / TEMPORARYSEDIMENTBASIN o 1 & I -ate FINAL EROSION& (DEVELOP TO PER , I , I II I I 1��IRI I /� I I ,' ) I Lo MANEM BASIN SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN / ( SII ISESTABUSHED) - �1 l \ 1 I ; I I i I l iB \ 4y�o, -- I swo \+ I I BCY+/-RIP FES E 6+ +\+ \1 1, I, am I wo 1 I\ \ 4,j I \\ P210� r III I I /J�J - _ i�_I I \ I I I I �L�- � I I i 1 IYU181LO -1 III I \, /J/ 6 CV+l-RIPRAP @ EOF -- e -`.__ --.-- _ - I I 2y I I l J 11 1 Cb l _ J IT J/ 1JJ NOTE TQ CONTRACTOR. \ - - - \ \! „ _� - I I >.[.- - (ADJUST AS NECESSARY& ADJUS7 SIL7 FENCE FOR \ __ FIELD FITASTO NOT OBSTRUCT TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION \- _� _ ' - J�(I J tl DATE REVISION PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS) E7(IT.INCLUDE BIOROLL((S11 — 8/OR ROCK CONSTRU-TItJN '— _ TALL THE SMALLER OF THE ENTRANCE qS NEEDED, 1 _ RIPRAP ROCKS ON OPPOSITE SIDE \ \ \ �!'�/1 1 \ / - —- I \\` \\ _ _ / A 11/07/2014 CITY REVISIONS I r OF WALKWAY.TOP OF RIPRAP SHALL --j \ \_ \\_ - �_ - - i / 1 B FLUSH WITH T P OF PAVEMENT. / j - _ _ , B 11/25/2014 CITY REVISIONS / � \\ \ \ 1 \\ \ -�` \\ \\`����---- — � — C 12/17/2014 24 LOTS SITE PLAN LEGEND SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION NOTE TO CONTRACTOR MACHINE SLICED SILT FENCE THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN SHEETS ALONG WITH THE REST OF THE SWPPP PHASE I: MUST BE KEPT ONSITE UNTIL THE NOTICE OF TERMINATION IS FILED WITH THE 1. INSTALL STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES. 'Tag TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN --�� MPCA.THE CONTRACTOR MUST UPDATE THE SWPPP,INCLUDING THE EROSION 4. INSTALL OFFSITE INLET PROTECTION. CONTROL PLAN SHEETS AS NECESSARY TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS 5. PREPARE TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGE AREA. REQUIREMENTS,SUCH AS ADDITIONAL OR MODIFIED BMPS DESIGNED TO ❑ 0 30 60 PLAN,SPECIFICATION,OR CORRECT PROBLEMS IDENTIFIED.AFTER FILING THE NOTICE OF TERMINATION, INLET PROTECTION DEVICE-IN STREET REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME 6. CONSTRUCT SILT FENCES ON THE SITE. THE SWPPP,INCLUDING THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN SHEETS,AND ALL OR UNDER DIRECT 7. CONSTRUCT THE SEDIMENTATION AND SEDIMENT TRAP BASINS. REVISIONS TO IT MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE OWNER,TO BE KEPT ON FILE IN SCALE IN FEET SUPERVISIONN AND THAT I AMA ACCORDANCE WITH THE RECORD RETENTION REQUIREMENTS DESCRIBED IN O INLET PROTECTION DEVICE-IN GREEN AREA DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF 8, INSTALL TEMPORARY BASIN/POND OUTLETS, THE SWPPP NARRATIVE. THE STATE OF MINNESOTA 9, HALT ALL ACTIVITIES AND CONTACT THE CIVIL ENGINEERING CONSULTANT RIPRAP WI NON-WOVEN FILTER FABRIC TO PERFORM INSPECTION OF BMPs.GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL SCHEDULE AND CONDUCT STORM WATER PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING EROSION CONTROL MATERIALS QUANTITIES WITH ENGINEER AND ALL GROUND DISTURBING CONTRACTORS BEFORE FIRMM EROSION CONTROL BLANKET-CATERGORY 3 David WN ash 10/2312014 PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION. 21336 ITEM UNIT QUANTITY ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE REGISTRATION NUMBER 10. CLEAR AND GRUB THE SITE. EA 11. BEGIN GRADING THE SITE. g INLET PROTECTION DEVICE ON STREET) 1 START CONSTRUCTION INLET PROTECTION DEVICE ON GREEN AREA) EA OF BUILDING PAD AND STRUCTURES. EROSION CONTROL BLANKET SF 6,750 LF 1,950 DRAWN BY CHECKS D BY 12. PHASE II: SILT FENCE 2 1. TEMPORARILY SEED DENUDED AREAS. ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE EA VN I ZRE DJN/ZR 2. INSTALL UTILITIES,UNDERDRAINS,STORM SEWERS,CURBS AND GUTTERS. DATE PROJECT# 3. INSTALL RIP RAP AROUND OUTLET STRUCTURES. 10.23.2014 2011-038.1 4, INSTALL ON-SITE INLET PROTECTION. 5. PREPARE SITE FOR PAVING. 6. PAVE SITE. SHEET NUMBER 7. COMPLETE GRADING AND INSTALL PERMANENT SEEDING AND PLANTING. PERMANENT SEEDING AND MULCH TO BE ESTABLISHED WITHIN 72 HOURS 0 OF ROUGH GRADING,ROUGH GRADING IS COMPLETION OF SITE GRADING 2 BEFORE UTILITY&STREET WORK BEGINS. 8, REMOVE ALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES --J (ONLY WHEN SITE IS STABILIZED),IF REQUIRED BY THE CONTRACT. I ONNECTION TO EXISTING SAmi000l' TORM STRUCTURE WI SSMH 32 CONNECTION TO EXISTIN CORE DRILL 5 BOOT, RIM=090.28 WATERM.G WITH WET (FIELD VERIFY EXISTING CONNECTION TO EXISTING SANITARY. INV(NE)-880.60 TAP 8 6'GATE VALVE. BUILD AND INVERTS) BUILD MH OVER EXISTING SEWER. FIELD VERIFY EXISTING ENGINEERING PROPOSED INV.=880.1 IX.PIPE INVERT=880.91(FIELD VERIFY) PIPE SIZE AND TYPE. CONNECTION TO CONNECTION TO SURVEYING 'II4 CONNECTION TO EXISTING EXISTING SANITARY STUB EXISTING SANITARY STUB ENVIRONMENTAL T r INV 880. pt, SANITARY.CORE DRILL 5 REMOVE WATER WITH FLEXIBLE BOOT WITH FLEXIBLE BOOT PLANNING NNECTION TO EXISTING FLEXIBLE BOOTYIELD VERIFY MAIN STUB AND EX PIPE INVERT APPROX. EX,PIPE INVERT APPROX. WATERMAIN WITH WET TING PIPE INVERT. CAP AT MAIN 893.3(FIELD VERIFY) 893,4(FIELD VERIFY) CONNECTION TO EXISTING INV-892 72 EXISTING SANITARY STUB EUS,INC. TAP&e'GATE VALVE. INV 892 CONNECTION TO WITH FLEXIBLE BOOT 10025 Valley View Road,Suite 140 IELD VERIFY EXISTING INV 890 o-o- EXISTING WATER BU LD MH TO EXISTING SANITARY. IX.PIPE INVERT APPROX.FY) Eden Prairie,Minnesota 55344 -0236 CONNECTION TO EXISTING SANITARY IPE SIZE AND TYPE. 0 STUB BUILD IF OVER EXISTING SEWER. 888,7(FIELD VERIFY) Phone:952-646-0236 STUB WITH FLEXIBLE BOOT dl! FIELD VERIFY EXISTING PIPE INVERT. e EX.PIPE INVERT APPROX.881.0- Fax:.evs 6-0290 J SAN MH 07 INV=893.01EX STcB CONNECTION TO Wrww.evs<ng.com M584.90-- (FIELD VERIFY) - - - -INV 892.97 EXISTING WATER T MV(E)-880.1 R, ° - STAB * ION T ( o-.... - E)(WnW SIWRARCONNECTY STUB - - IX SSM INV 93. -s '� WITH FLEXIBLE BOOT - - RIM-90 30 _ EX PIPE INVERT APPROX ( O W \ 890.6(FIELD VERIFY) - w SSMH 1 t ---�----. _ Ip --fFS.H II 8- _ _ INV(E)-893.01 - - - - FINAL PUD PLANS RIM-Br .31 .\ I WO INV(IM 1- - - iNv(Sw .85 RIM=ae - 8 I CLIENTs t 2 wo wx.50+ � 6 /swo Lakew est Development,LLC LO I A, " I F�I / II I- - - -�1N =a --� I - I I I III 24 PROJECT „o I - - --_ -- ------ - _--- Laurel Ponds One �VA -I I - - - -- - i LOCATION I wO I I I I 1R5 I I I I I I -- - 1 I I I I I I 11 1s I I I I Golden Valley,MN LOI iL " I I I I I R I L -j�- _ -___j I I� ---J I $ j� SHEET _ I Overall Utility Plan A I ' I I I Ir I I I I!- ri I I TUG�sLO u 19 I I� i III I ---------._I MA n _- I IJ I I I 6 1 I �I 11 I I I I I R I I II I I , R I II I II JI I i t ----- -- _ I - - - - �_ �I s,', I � I wo I � N 70-__-i (------_ --1i I' _ II F, I I -81M=_ 5.90 � I '�'i �I I-----._�-.-"-� ----__'I I I � I I I /� A '-2'RCP t� O 0.301L I _INV W=8873/ I -I i I I li I J I I 691-2 P 0.29x I I I 13 CB PVC ttm��n I I� I S IIMH + I $I I I I 15' 81101110I I I RIMS 08.7 I I AVO $ II I Ii wO 12 INV(IW59343 i II i I Ij INV(E) 5.7 � GV I L j 76 �I 12'RCP O 1 85 ; I I I I- 1 TUG SLO NE 2 LE"NOUT 10.0-- _ -" _ I �-� SSAAH t0 II # DATE REVISION SOLD LID - _--- --- --- - - - '-- - ---� / RIM=909.80 21 RIM=883.0 r --- �-��- -,__ _ - '�--- - / IINY(W)-900.77 ' INV=880.5 -._---_.--------------------- --- 175-15 P � - --_-� I A 11/07/2014 CITY REVISION STMH 2 CBMH 3 49-24'RCP o.31x I1/25/2014 CITY REVISION$ T RIM-885.34 RIM=885.30 ==H 4 -- --- ------ ---�-- � - �--�--- - I I f RIM-885.34 9 INV(N)=882.29 RIM=887.50 -- --------- -�--- C 12/17/2014 24 LOTS SITE PLAN INV(SW)=882.09 INV(5)=882.29 INV(N)=882.70 INV(5)=882.44 STMH 6 PVC -- CBMH 5 RIM=909.28 i RIM N)00 INV(W)=904.99 8GVI INV(N)=89895.98 INV(5)=904.99 INV(s)=895.98 LEGEND MATERIAL NOTES UTILITY NOTES X GATE VALVE 1. THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION ® CURB STOP ALL MATERIALS SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED IN CEAM SPECIFICATIONS EXCEPT AS AND/OR ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS MODIFIED HERIN. BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES AND,WHERE POSSIBLE,MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD.THE INFORMATION IS NOT 4- HYDRANT I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS 1. ALL MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. TO BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE.THE CONTRACTOR MUST PLAN,SPECIFICATION,OR 2. ALL SANITARY SEWER TO BE PVC SDR-35 FROM 0'-18'DEEP,OR SDR-26 FROM CALL THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY AT LEAST 48 HOURS BEFORE ANY I WATERMAIN REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME >18'DEEP,UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. EXCAVATION TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES.IT SHALL BE OR UNDER MY DIRECT 3. 8 INCH WATERMAIN TO BE PVC C-900 DR18 WITH 7.5 FEET MINIMUM COVER. THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING 0 SANITARY MANHOLE SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A 4. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE TO BE REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE WITH R-6 UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL JOINTS AND RUBBER GASKETS,UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. ON THE PLANS.THE LOCATIONS OF SMALL UTILITIES SHALL BE OBTAINED BY > SANITARY SEWER ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF 5. RIP-RAP SHALL BE MNOOT CLASS 3. THE CONTRACTOR,BY CALLING GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT(651)454-0002. OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE/ THE STATE OF MINNESOTA 6. ALL WATERMAIN SERVICES SHALL BE I INCH HDPE. ■ / • / , STORM CATCH BASIN/ 7. ALL SANITARY SEWER SERVICES TO BE 4'PVC SDR 35. 2. SAFETY NOTICE TO CONTRACTORS:IN ACCORDANCE HATH GENERALLY FLARED END SECTION 8. 4_PERFORATED DRAINTILE TO BE INSTALLED 50'EACH SIDE OF ALL LOW ACCEPTED CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES,THE CONTRACTOR SILL BE SOLELY POINTS AND COMPLETELY RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDITIONS ON THE JOB SITE, STORM SEWER David Nash INCLUDING SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY DURING DATE 1012312014 PERFORMANCE OF THE WOR K.THISREQUIREMENT WILL APPLY ___�___>--->- DRAINTILE REGISTRATION NUMBER 21836 CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS.THE DUTY OF THE ENGINEER OR THE DEVELOPER TO CONDUCT CONSTRUCTION REVIEW OF THE CONTRACTOR'S PERFORMANCE IS NOT INTENDED TO INCLUDE REVIEW OF THE ADEQUACY OF THE CONTRACTOR'S SAFETY DRAWN BY CHECKED BY MEASURES IN,ON OR NEAR THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. 3. ALL AREAS OUTSIDE THE PROPERTY BOUNDARIES THAT ARE DISTURBED BY VN/ZRE DJN/ZRE UTILITY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RESTORED IN KIND.SODDED AREAS DATE PROJECT# SHALL BE RESTORED WITH 6INCHES OF TOPSOIL PLACED BENEATH THE Sop, 10.23.2014 2011-038.1 4. FINISHED GRADE IS THE CENTERLINE PROFILE.MANHOLE RIMS DEVIATE FROM THE CENTERUNE ELEVATION AS A RESULT OF THEIR OFFSET AND ARE SHOWN ACCORDINGLY. SHEET NUMBER 5. SEWER SERVICE STATION SHOWN IS THE DISTANCE FROM DOWNSTREAM 0 30 60 7 MANHOLEWYE CONNECTION IN 0400 6. CITY OF GOLDEN DEN VALLEY STANDARD DETAIL SPECIFICATIONS SHALL SCALEE IN FEET GOVERN. F Amiooll' ENGINEERING SURVEYING ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING EVS,INC. uc.cou,a.�crca _ SSMH 32 -.onre*usnuo w ^"o rope s.xn°av' RIM-890.28 0PO9m eoor evE , rEu s�.x amvw 10025 Valley View Road,64 140 INV(NE)=880.60 ,ie wnu+.s,uc Eden PraiPhFax:952-646-026 II/r � �^�'®`; � /f Fax:952-6464290 I v , ,w�a°z. ®.virenew» / Fz�o"xrz`inv"°aT vxvEumaawa ' ocv 1 m G91xC1=T www.evscng.com .. ,I�m,�°gym -- - eezc, w`vsewen e°Eo.,lnunvvram °eve - - _ 1 E% -----�- r • 'gn _r ._ aM �"`.°wwa�a. i CM9ewxi - nna- .72 - - - SS 11 '-'-«�- _ r RtM=909. _ '- � � - - FINAL PUD PLANS ° t ss I-- - - � - PENN LVANIA AVE RIM=893.D �•�su� a �5 a �� I P uo �n TUNG/ o rrv(s /// a'uqo� I ! SS: , L S fio I _LO BTI F m>-_7Ny(EY)--_.�� -----� 24 ^ I 9 CLIENT y° I' m NV(w)=93h'' <; rte- � P ��- -- Lakewest Development,LLC � I �D E' I w PROJECT IT - Laurel Ponds One A; _ _ I r j aft s Sv I I I 1p 2!3 LO fa I LOCATION WO to xi - � �- = - --� z"�'� 1 Golden Valley,MN 1 - Q f3 SHEET ssNjH 1s'-6 Prh�vo � I m m �� V-�`_g.�--i wo =9 1. - _ NO mi� - -� Sanitary&Watermain j 1 6(w)- 3. !r a.o -Q MH Plan &Profiles- --. .--- _ - - II 909.8 -- --_ _ II�T=900.77 mt: Private Road MATERIAL NOTES NOTES 1. ALL MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY NTH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. 1. ALL CURB AND PAVEMENT TO BE REMOVED ON PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE 2. ALL SANITARY SEWER TO BE PVC SDR-35 FROM 0'-18'DEEP,OR SDR-26 FROM SHALL 2 MATCH E SWC CURB AND PAVEMENT SECTION. p 50 100 >18'DEEP,UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. # DATE REVISION 3. 8 NCH WATERMAIN TO BE PVC C-900 DR18 WITH 7.5 FEET MINIMUM COVER. 3. SEWER SERVICE STATION IS THE DISTANCE FROM DOWNSTREAM MANHOLE 920 4. AlLL STORM SEWER PIPE TO BE REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE WITH R4 TO WYE CONNECTION. 920 A 11/07/2014 CITY REVISIONS JOINTS AND RUBBER GASKETS,UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 4 BOULEVARD.ADDITIONAL IELD VERIFY.UTILITIES MAY EXIST IN PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE SCALE IN FEET 5. RIP-RAP SHALL BE MNDOT CLASS 3. _ - _ B 11/25/2014 CITY REVISIONS 6. ALL WATERMAIN SERVICES SHALL BE I INCH HDPE. C 12/17/2014 24 LOTS SITE PLAN 7. ALL SANITARY SEWER SERVICES TO BE 4"PVC SDR 35. / 915 918 900 / - - .SSMH 10 . 900 SSMH 11. - RIM-909.80 RIM-909.50 .INV )m900.77. 910 INV(E)=893.01 G. - SSMH 31 WO HYDRANT 910 910 J RIM=893.00 SOB 805 INV(E)=880.85 E(SSMH 22 INV(sw)=880.85 - RIM-904.30 - SSMH 21' SSMH-32 - - - - - RI8INV(E)-892.72' RIM=903.10 M= ' INV(NE)=89 - INV(E)=893.11 SSMH 20 9D8 90.28 905 - INv(w)=893.11 RIM-901.40 116' 9� I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS - - I )=893.63 906 PLAN,SPECIFICATION,OR E% RRQP6 - 990 - - - - -24REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME ago FIELD VERIFY - SSMH 30 - i HYDRANT OR -8r PVC - OR UNDER MY DIRECT - RIM-885.90 _ - . . . SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A Q - _ (11)-881.57 - _ _ - - I DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL . T ` HYDRANT. 000 ,-g, . . 900 000 ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF 198 IA- 900 THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. .14'-B' PVC 985 36'-g_ i David Nash fwwN = I 990 - 998 DATE 10l 2014 000 000 . 989 REGISTRATION NUMBER 21818 990 63'4•PVC-0 0.40% 214'-8' PVC DRAWN BY CHECKED BY 000 m000: MO yo o Rrn e78 . anm mm VN/ZRE DJN I ZRE m a mm 1 0+00 1+00 m 2+00 - DATE PROJECT# o Ilimm m� 0F09 1+w Op 006 _ M 10.23.2014 2011-038.1 �a c 0+00 1+00 2+00 SHEET NUMBER C401 FlELD VERIFY SMALL UTIUTIES /� p "ED VERIFY SMALL UTILITIES CROSSING ON PENNSYLVgNl4 'Q BEC CROSSING ON PENNSYLVANp AVENUE FlELD VERIFY SMALL UTILITIES AVENUE ENGINEERING . A AVENUE G ON PENN$yLVANIA j" SURVEYING Ex Ce ENVIRONMENTAL Ex s7CB - - PLANNING _ EVS,INC. /7 0025 Valley View Road,Suite,40 Eden Prairie,Minnesota 55344 I O Y I f / �.' , I •+ --,�. '_-_ _ t.�l' I - I O I r Phone:952-646-0236 Wo www ev-gxon, 9 W RIM _ ' J NV I o I� I I I I I� f7 I T98,OY0 I I 18 1 - I ' - I NV W-B 50 d ♦ 9 I a OC4 1 -1 I y ( •9l0 L- to 9 _J W s� ' % ; ftIM=8765- Ami"'001, _ EH VE TNG 8 I tiro: -J L__- ]{ NV(W O. n n 2 I I ! -� I I _ -_� j I EHI E NG r /� A Fk Lo d ! -1 -=_= - - I m - Jk I 1T.9 II FINAL PUD PLANS - - - I i ; I O �4 I I 1 I MII(E)f IM=90 I n wo -� - �_ I f° � � � III I -te I ttro/1% ' `4"RC �9% I �� ;� I 12 -C I I nI 9 24"R1;P 010 CLIENT i /a��''''-,' � � B RIM: 7 RG O'u. LI {4"RC O 29R I L a J I I I X0_97 I I _ _ __- _ _- _ � L�e� Lakewest Development, LLC �irtcoaiovrn rNre,im or...oewooa� �'-1 R O 185% ( I STMH 6 " PROJECT eros seem avrn J -' 71p/ RIM=909.28 t INS{IN =8B. a >� - 21 INV(W)=904.99 I j 8 =88._ 4 INy(S)_9D4.99 I�( �'"°'^ � Laurel Ponds One iw.Moe STMH 2 CBMH 34 RCP ---- ERCP S'S' �_ � ._ RIM=8851.34 ftIM=885.30 S1MH 4 I �x"Toa RM-8 5.34 9 INV(N)85.30 9 RIM-887.50 9 24 RC WV(N)-882.70 STMH 6 STMH 2 CBMH LOCATION INV(SW)=882.09 IW(S)=882.29 INV(S)=882.44 CBMH 5 RIM-909.28 ! 5.34 RIM=885.30 I 3'SUMP W/SNOUT RIM-900.70 9,y(W)=904.99 Golden Valley, MN I INV(N)=895.98 INV88 09--'1Ny(51 INV(S)=904.99 3'SUMP W/SNOUT � I INv(5)=895.98 I i SHEET Storm Plan &Profiles 9m 920 0 50 100 /. SCALE IN FEET j 916 918 jSTMH 6 RIM-909.28 INV(W)-904.99 # DATE REVISION . / IW(S)�904.99 010 A 11/07/2014 CITYREVISIONS 9110 . - B U/25/2014 CITYREVISIONS C 12/17/2014 24 LOTS SITE PLAN . 905 CBMH 5 905RIM-900.70 .INV(N)=8958 900 900 . 175-15•RCP O 51.16% . fIHEREBY THAT . �. . 898 9� 920 PLAN,SPECIFICATION,OR HIS - REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME 895 . - _ / _ OR UNDER MY DIRECT 800 8pp SUPERVISION AND THAT I AMA DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL - 2•HIGH DENSITY - - - - Ex STCB.1.1 - ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF RIM-884.90 P SULAInRENE ,N 4/ - - 9t8' 918 THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. .FES 1 INSULATION DYER RIM=BB'/.50 - - - - - 810 - INV(E)=680.10 a90 INV(NE)=882.00INV 882.7 _ _ STMH 2 CBMH 3 I S)= 44 _ CB 7 - RIM-885.34 RIM-885.30 - RIM 908 70 988 NS IW(N)=862.09 INV(N)=882.29 197'-15"RCP 6.90% MV(E)=905.70 OCS 1 27 IN DAT Nash IW(SW)-882.09 IW(5)=88 _ RIM+883.85 DATE 10ATIO 74 4'SUMP a� 910 oto INV(W)-880.50 -REGISTRATION NUMBER 21 SM . STMH 6 M6 - _ RIM=909.28 . INV(W)=904.99 88D INV(S)=904.99 - - - - _ DRAWN BY CHECKED BY e� 908 . . 908 83'_12•RCP o 0.48% VN/ZRE DJN/ZRE 880 49'-24•RCP O 0.31% - 39'-12"RCP O 1.85%, 69'-24•RCP-O 0.2S% - 878 6'78 DATE PROJECT# zsbwill g n m m 9m 8 10.23.2014 2011-0381 o 0+0 m N � 0+0095 P SHEET NUMBER gm m z+OO 3+00 440D 5+WD+00 1+W C501 J =LGD 74'K 1,1183 CA=T M01 REMa1E RDOSIYIO GSINO METER FIT CAST ROM a/ FRAME NO C04F11 i FRAME q+-0770 / {+jI7E1 3 4 JCo rp t THREAD FITING HIM tMt+t PDAPPLrTER01 o.` CR �.aoo���f RF210VE OOSINO RfD BArHEi TAPE, ,OVER =EI IEDIAM 11-1132 fEl1Es>m 3• g Y - Mx:tIDN As REmED T ADJUSTING RINGS I t Efgtm GRADE - - ta.a 1 � ENGINEERING (EwsnNc) 4n d` � (MIN.2 MAX.5) I 10 �SEALANT OR t 7/e' ,HEAD rAPG GR 74* SURVEYING MTAL �>a 7 I 3• wYx MEADS —"'—' ENVIRONMENTAL MINIMUM 4' 1° PLANNING A�D�a°n01�'a'Ero ATTACH OML%EAK p...+.. ... FLEx-SEAL UTILITYCWM A A= E AT S M9ED GRADE ATTACH=P'2 900 COPPER COPPEII ipA(�11�E A7 Y SVS,INC. 38 7/Ir� 1 SEALANT(OR 111ACEN IPE AT7AT C.G tEn PtASY,c TIP-TREsIf SE'-ST-000) I .r FlF%SEAL 9F14/VIT COYG 10TN IEDRAH t7yS APPROVED EQUAL) �' 2i-lE5(OM (OR APNOOND SOUK) 10025 Valley View Road,S 5 140 am���) ��!ODCOYR•f35 8LEAW 2C OF EXCESS WIEden Prairie,Minnesota 55344 N1NI OODDNVALLL1'1000. 2! SEDPE YasRM Phone:952-646-0236SEXSTALL APP110Vm FAUAL� SS-010 Fax:952-646-0290 ppa1N0 CI51a10 -CdWEEAW14tNDMMc3Ir FROM www.evsQng.com )Nil PLASIE1t '� A. ACTED FtiRAN OA710N CIUEDGR BARE SLAB FORam ELSE '0 -- Tq,-+• fJSf r m 2E'6E/NO 7 (SM 6YEOa AS NEEDED PLACE SAa GR t/C YORTAR 1101-CORaIOMH*Ail �� SED AID 1ROVR.IOIIT 51001+1 V Ra PIPE SAVED To team NOTE APPLY FLEX-SEAL U71UTY SEALANT(OR APPROVED (RECONSTRUCTED) ALL AT EQUAL)ON THE INSIDE SURFACE OF ADJUSTMENT RING AREA. I he"I 4.OEH101R�/ - •RUMM /101E: SEALANT SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM THICKNESS of 175 MILS I g"m"W'E("` M1°`"�PIPE"A1C BE�R-231 PYO' FINAL PUD PLANS BARREL AND EIMD FROM 3• ABOVE BOTTOM OF CASTING FRAME TtIK2Ee WK Sa>EnuF 4o Pw art a m DIP.SETS 91A1L E A IMMY OF ao•C®AT 11E .; 1111SECTION COVERING ALL RINGS.TO 3'BELOW BOTTOM RING ADJUSTMENT g+AEn MAu PImPEEtTv uE.SaEpAa 4o PVC PIPE AS SHOWN ABOVE. StMl wvE savExr+o•EEs STEP OEMt tT PIPE wTEAPL Na sIDPE _ :.•'.- PER SEATS PUR�RO CODE N DEPTH. AIPM01aD IONIAR 14.2010 • �aASE IPPIrW,7fP10a 1L 7006 SANITARY SEWER p - AAPWAID� '•300 MANHOLE OR SANITARY SEWER ��ey SERVICE WITH RISER ` CLIENT APPROIYD MZwWIr,,2ola SANITARY SEWER V CATCH BASINa SERVICE(PROPERTY - (DEEP SERVICE) BY-57-040^+O®�'�''DI3 STANDARD SANITARY MANHOLE J J LINE TO HOUSE) M�� n"D Lakewest Development SEWER MANHOLE WITH eJ RECONSTRUCTION SEALANT DETAIL 6Y-SS-000 a+Y DOTH TEM 911 CASTING&COVER 6V-SS-082 ��I�3311 CITY��Ro 2311 GV -010 �'M+rm leo f31+0 PROJECT' .r � Laurel Ponds One ]/ T R�FAD 3 tl FITTING HUB WITH 4' (�N01O A A LOCATION 3/4 CONCRETE r McooEluo THREADEDPLON THR� Golden Valley, MN 11A. ADAISTMENT RINGS A'SERIES CAST EQUAL.pV�APPROVED B SHEET WL 2 MML 6 IRON METER PIT THREADS. L Rt(aET SIDE NEN[ NEDIAH tI-, n>mss 7V!• a• FRAME AND M..ORWUAI. s GEMANT OR rfAL AOANstLE2RT �� FINISHED L I II ' ,� Details �Saw(>¢ t Inas(SEE MOTE) �4. GRADE •--.-I A I-"-�W A DENTAL ov-31-000) T I to 1�bEbC PLAN x TAG" r 1 -I� / r_a H JJ Z MNOTE ui=PDOWm EaD THREADED RX)D War 15• 1 TO' ,SET�• l.-2. DME 2 MAX.� 1` �CIIOIrS,2•-24•.]0•!30' 4' TOPSOIL LEAVE 24'OF 70 , AL�RNnRs FT2aNT MITE a• rtr �� �+ 0-fa AS SEOMED NOTE EXCESS WIRE 1 AT SURFACE PART/PPE gff A BI N L W ATTACH A fXEEEN/12 rn RaRN 4M MSE SUR SOLID COPPER TRACER 12 M a.b Y 114 Y GRAM 260 M 260 M FILTER PRECAST a stns PRREI•ASf CO1RUEtE �' ,2T(M4P(yp mm)OW II.a p64 mm)(1M rA0(Wd mm)OGRE mm) ND1E SEAIIE7 WIRE TO PIPE AT 3'O.C. to Y as M 1310 Y GRA M 731.0 Y 2310 Y EOR DtAcr R6NM CUANiNEs SF(`T10N A-A WITH PLASTIC ZIP-TIES TRACER WIRE ,ST01(P(ale,,.,,)p1 RRRO(2641RM)(tW mm)(a3S mm)4777 RRN) RF2G m r HOTS: IIDOr Sd1DAID M01C m�NNtAemR�await�%No'iE OR APPROVED EQUAL), PIATEs YSt>e. AID WANlO1E MM MIDI ItOl1 SOOT. GRAIL FOR 9NML SE Im1AN 83007-L=17N Z•TrPE ( 1 Y 7A Y 160 M 60 M 720 Y M Y GRAN FOR STORM SEWER T8,(M4P(480 mm)Oh mm)tae+mm)(tae mm)Lela mm)(MIs mm) If N"wP Mom OAtIED 1K 3101010 w.• (2FANQU15 HIRE SHALL ORA11111M FILTER MAIaE7 GR ,RPM2rED.N RI/A11aL r MORE THAM s-?teas AHE IFFDm CONTRACTOR ALSO HAVE BROWN STRIPE K M 7A• Tao N u M 76.0 Y 460 Y OEAIET GP FABRIC.TYPE n # DATE REVISION SHALL LNSE A oaauTtGR 6 Y.E AND tO Was ro 24,ONP poo R+R)OM+mm)(467 111 4+W MJ(N4 mm)4117 AMS) ON�RP�7735)REOMIED 3r ACHE*Mtmm HEIGHT. A 11/07/2014 CITY REVISIONS PL Nm SHALL SE SEK2D U9M0 APPRO+ED FLEX-SEAL t.1121PP >b- t0A Y TUTNETr>FAI�VIT AHD ArPLA.aTIGR 9HML EOLLOM DETAL (7310 )(217 RNJN/ATe I") 7M t72J mm) B 11/25/2014 CITY REVISIONS OV-ss-SEA >e Y 101 Y N/A (1781 ltYta)+3M Y t OLD Y SCCTION B-B LIEN RFIESMLtIIo KD COIROE7E ARE TO BE N ACCORDANCE TO MAIN 43100 EPR) Ir msrAaurE GR SEN n Asn rElsxwT GR ala A 480310 PEMaLMr+,2007 AWWMMPD2NRARr,.» CORRUGATED pV RIPRAP AT Vrlvl(�iley AArlarm,wRHART 32010 ] �ey APPROVED"Tom2L 2,31 TYPICAL POLYETHYLENE APRON eJ OUTLEAPPW"ARIAMM 3 mIo STANDARD STORM CATCH BASIN ft llR�f ( �,yyLCLEANOUT WITH TRASH GUARD CM WYmI 23110EWER MANHOLE DES DESIGN K �rrJFSASSEMBLY On•MHarol tEo sono 6Y-sT-120 4020 Wln1 CASTING& 6V-SI.. CRT Nom RIDE 231,0 6V-ST-050 01r DIIIm REO L71H COVER GV-ST-010 �� Cm Blow REM 23110 em 1RW681 STEELT-POST: 1�C.W7011a A)CONup S N MAINTA ED N A RE�DNRK eey r�%20'NDE T MAK SPACING ILL R1M1r E1r1L r EMv COA>m EMS PIEHNT TTUOGRO GR OMECT COMMERCIAL-s0'LONG%20'VOCE 11 Ri1E1 Ar n,D EN Man mATm SET,/4'SEIDM/NYMm OIAOE FUN OF MIND ONTO SMEE76 By r DEEP. EMm T apRNO•{m RA MO NJR Rtt�RRa-As OA'RIIIn�L1rAAOMAiME A ro eR�9n Y `a� MTwlw=euvAna stplE wr eE IECEssARr. PLASTIC 21P-TIES I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS T rr L,.rr-PA P OR a 2 1/Y airE IrE IR4fiIaM r.1/Y PLASTIC=YES(GR A PROHD SOUK). e)ANY w1DNAL raLtH SELL 4� � �MI FAWTHI NI TOP PLAN,SPECIFICATION, fEr1W N®INO.R1rMRP Cwt s PArW COL 24.OF DDFS=NEE AROUND 86L YN6S R GR10 M ROID r-rs 04E aro PMIrM2L 1311031 AT DACE IMAM SE Y. uP REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME m-a r W 0-01 alEDuar. SU UNDER N DIRECTAM 4RY e 4 MANNIt E�Tssl >• OEOT.TTLEWAD FABRIC SUPERVISION AND THAT I ONA aALJeMa� M e f Bow r (3 FT NIDE) DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL TNT FINISHED GRADE ®Ge-ALL MT1IlOs SCOL SE EPoRr n IDWWI�D�• EIrL orE for m ur#sWNo rtd m R%,CtaE RRIaN AW e0LrE0 tREnHIMUNFICIRMLY ACROSS ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF r2Au troArr 10sW'i1°'°1°I A'°W' QE7n aDAND STANLSS =TEF OMIS .n,p THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. EK 1m6ImO VU[a AIIEW.am dP. ANCHOR FABRIC N ® o2Mr 1/s•231 to Arm AW ML - MD WN6 ',R TRENCH WTH TAMPED 11"46 r_ F NATURAL SOIL BACKFILL pl 151 �' - .1 t,/2•SEF PIPE pA CML,'IpONr cuTED Maw pelEC� Ei i MPO EN�r I AlD(f WDQ N AOCODARICE Rrsael 7x :o •,M A�aWM P�RE91tt °OF+ao° DAT Kia z3lmu �- I -SER WE— -- E K E __ REGISTRATION NUMBER 21838 �jv AND >�0 DUCRE MOI. TVI21I 4WD. C r MOOD Ia IUVMO 7tE •t.. =wr,• ro MAN no 1Mlvf GST 1t411E01 AID/a r lr :• i Z-L BAf M WILT SMLL KW COMMERCIAL ••t.•,ra •1 ~ TO NOT uss+'�,z•HIPwD Et101 aaNAl COLeME1OK r IrL •j.�'•� ;:,)..•f.,.l.,., 'b DRAWN BY CHECKED BY 7RAC2R YME trMWLY SEONI6D W ro tWTTALL2D PCrtIGR AID INCLUDE A PORED VK� 2_ �aAr wEUE THROUGHOUT SEK M006 GOOD VKK eGR Ala1Q �r'•,2•�••LL' 4 PAa1 rOr1R OP SEEN•Ww.0 m EN eM1eSa-CONDOMS Mna EnLNrwTaN WNL.,ECOMEEDED ryp%Y COATED t/4•SIM PER Am SEE Moor 26737 M t3�• VN/ZRE DJN/2RE Pa MRAr1rO r AlEr1E)�r •�\,• W 4•ilat 1ON+W arts RWT r rsRRiRr r011 A9/A511 m pmE a rMRW 11106 nr as l.N tlaaN 1eEN■use sto x Wuc AIM tr tr) `,Y"•••`'•: .4DATE PROJECTECT# ENUrEI MT To SCALE AMMMELMMOL" EXTEND Y SETOIo EDGE •..,i�!f;t`(..t. YN. ZM v1ln_1•RaE%ELME 0.00 e22-4440 GR AT MmaALD W04-1) r ro r aaNsaD Rooc EVL 7r..•'.•:: 10.23.2014 2011-038.1 �� �•-� BmAOs- AT YQNONKD 51122 T!I(T)-NO E%TFIN=ROM MSR Id.Y (MOOCOatCA- CM2 COURSE AOME9A10 y art t RAA 1Ewt to sr 1r Ants m R+Ms �EYeglaeL- PER STATE PLL19a CODE trx r r r ro r CWNSHED W1W EtR w 1 R oPw .1.1 t err re SEN r CONCRETE SEOOf ENTRANCE, LOONS CA,�31 2 ca RSE AooEaATE) � SHEET NUMBER v 111aMWT .. rat GRE1 MEOW Ar Pt�Ear r Tr PMEI 0Ro �Na�DEEMNNMT,.>„ C601 aaoa'I i�Mmc +r' APPWM PpMlrr 1.2W2 Ti�WIA 1I1I rW+om�/a� "7013 ROCK -� TYPICAL SILT FENCE %rweyA14MN®NAr 70.2MS T PROPERTY R SERO CE ) - INSTALLATION AL GATE L� ��+ '�y ' COENTRANCE N ev �•XMRNEXX 01311 0 0 INSTALLATIONTYPICAL HYDRANT fd NRmEI�(�eV ( GV-EC-010INSTALLATION ""+�' JHOUSE) an Olom Ho 2ano 0 �m m X10 6Y-EC-0TO '� 6V-WM-010 em Dom m=10 BY-COM-031 J Ory Dlrm IEE 2311 VAVARIES 25' x'3' CL LF1M_I'N_)L 15'TO 41' U g 20'MIN FRONT VARIES W FINISHED GRADE AFTER HOUSE to T GARAGE FLOOR FINISHED GRADE FOR PAD 1 FILTER ASSEAMR MBLY — ---- --� o ------------ ENGINEERING POLYESTER SLEEVE TOPSOIL BELOW 2.75'HOLDDONM � ENGINEERED FILL �:� SURVEYING CATCH BASIN 0.5'TWALK-OUT OPENING IFREQUIRED(TYP.) ENVIRONMENTAL COVER BASEMENT FLOOR 0.5'TOPSOIL PLANNING (AROUND BUILDING ASSEMBLY _ __—j PAD ONLY) EVS,INC. /��` . SUITABLE BEARING SOIL(IYP.) 10025 Valley View Road,Suite 140 I Eden Prairie,Minnesota 55344 -0236 Phone:952-646-0236 •8'FROM GARAGE FLOOR TO BASEMENT FLOOR ELEVATION(TVP) Faz:9S2-646-0290 MAY REQUIRE STEPS IN GARAGE,REFER TO PLAN SHEETS www.evs-eng.com FILTER ASSEMBLY 1 WALK-OUT WO POLYESTER SLEEVE NOT TO SCALE C602 DETACHED T%_jV E MANHOLE COVER ASSEMBLY FINAL PUD PLANS VARIES VARIES 25 V'3 CE S'(MIN) Q 20'MIN FRONT VARIES in FINISHED GRADE AFTER HOUSE CLIENT 3' GARAGE FLOOR FINISHED GRADE FOR PAD """Ma'E"/"�"Yt'°°' TEMPORARY W1MC0'• VAINQy Lakewest Development, LLC INLET PROTECTION J 0.5'TOPSOIL TOPSOIL BELOW a'` 3.0'HOLDDOWN— - PROJECT atr Nlam to CV•EC-000 LOOK-0UT OPENING — �j ENGINEERED FILL �. (AROUND BUILD ` Laurel Ponds One (AROUND BUILDING IF REQUIRED(rvPJ -------------- PAD ONLY) BEEp1A� ^ BASEMENT FLOOR LOCATION K atttttrta ��� ,� iD(pANSO caNTRACTIaN ,� N JOINT j Golden Valley, MN SPACED EQUALLY VAT" SUITABLE BEARING SOIL(TYP-) NO CURB LENGTH LINE STRAIGHT OVER 10 FT. PvimEN YLVANI LINE ON MTOP T SHEET PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE •VARIES AND MAY FLOOUR TO STEPS F LOOK-OU RAGETREFER TOPLANSHEETS ATION(TYP) Construction 2 LOOKT LO Details mom / I NOT TO SCALE C602 DETACHWNHOME II;� CONTRACTION I SUPPORTTEED�ON BASKETS .w.. ZFIU '• bM � JOINTS A A 011111jum I- SECTION AA VARIES VARIES 25' YI 3' rt THRU GUTTER 5'(MIN) O �� �_` - 20'MIN FRONT VARIES NO.5 REBARS � \ I 12.O C. FINISHED GRADE GRADE AFTER HOUSE 3,1 TOPSOIL 0.5' •- E � %MINS BELOW OPENING GARAGFLOOR FINISHED GRADE FOR PAD ._ t----- — -- # DATE REVISION O ..fw.rtr�a•I. A"'s a'a"`a"""s""wl`M RADIUS VARIES.15'703 s A 11/07/2014 CITY REVISIONS TO BACK OF CURB TYP. 3' .--�-•� .25'HOLDDOWN �i ENGINEERED FILL ,�..aw rw rs•aaa. ^ 0.5'TOPSOIL IF REQUIRED(TYP.) B 11/25/2014 CITY REVISIONS 12D :L.�iwwir.�i a"�.a..�s FLOWUNE ^. w�.�e..sa w aa..f w alive V M s tru ais sa n•nr (AROUND BUILDING C 12/17/2014 24 LOTS SITE PIAN Q�w Aa t�>.e� vett gra w.a�twart..•ztm BASEMENT FLOOR PAD ONLY) ru■ar rw�r�isi wa p.,.a�a.,.,..,..s...•.w.... 777:1 A~M roo r to suo COMMERCIAL CROSS e SUITABLE BEARING SOIL(TYR)cu RBSRAMP GUTTER DRIVEWAY Y i •8'FROM GARAGE FASEMENT FLOOR ELEVATION(TVP) �•��,�n„o (cccD) GV-M-0B0 MAYREQUIRESTEPS INGARAGE,REFER TO PLAN SHEETS OR Btttlmt �. of 3 RAMBLER (R) —.._ - .. NOT TO SCALE -- C602 DETACHED TOWNHOM I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS DETAIL B PLAN,SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME 1101E:11E FTIOlF1t 41At1 Y110<FE1D pEtpaNAlKIb 6 TlaORADE StATAtfTf1'AHO.r COMME A VA M A SEU T G C011R/C10R 70 YAQY SU UNDER N DIRECT TW plea,� W FXCAVATIW AID 41ECf ORIIaAM 501atOa VARIES SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A 5(MIN)4"THICK�TYP) I THICK AT DRIVEWAYS 3 DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL CONC.WALK(MIX 3A32)MNIDOT SPEC.2521 ti-`3.1 TOPSOIL BELOW OPENING ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF Pti [Ft 4"AGG.BASE CL 5(100%CRUSHED) `'��-\ 2%(MIN) THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Pti Bit OR 4"AGG BASE CL 7 MN/DOT SPEC 3138 A2 VARIES 25' 13' vANL9 31'(TYP) v �..{ RNV 5'-7'VMDE 3:� •\ 20'MIN FRONT VARIES David Nash v'�'S I&W 1 ur REFER TO SITE PLAN `'i UJ FINISHED GRADE AFTER HOUSE DATE IN 2312014 ♦� \ W !4 *� - SDK 10PE VARIE BASEMENT FLOOR GARAGE FLOOR FINISHED GRADE FOR PAD 1��J REGISTRATION NUMBER 21390 1.CPE E l.QE ___ �__________ SA a q 4• VARIES 2%MAX —�_�- CROSSSLOPE 2%MIN 10'HOLDDOWN TP-11/IP-DUT . A� t.5•PINfT�®971aI101R NF'�V7pD BY DRAWN BY CHECKS ��� taz PL oE9otA710N � '•' (ARO ND �� ENGINEERED FILL DETAIL B •8'FROM GARAGE FLOOR TO TOP OF REAR BASEMENT FOUNDATION WALL ELEVATION(TYP) (AROUND BUILDING IF REQUIRED(TVP.) Soo r/4'1aysMA (ABOVE) 8"(fYP.)+� MAY REQUIRE STEPS IN GARAGE,REFER TO PLAN SHEETS PAD ONLY) VN I ZRE DJN/ZRE tY A00IEDATE Bw9F,QA9S 5-t00R anlsm I SUITABLE BEARING SOIL(TYP.) DATE PROJECT# taESrOE-W xxtt GEpT�FWW TYPE tv-�x105 NOTES: 10.23.2014 2011-038.1 AS DEEM NEDE59ARY aY THE ENGNSI t 1.MIN 8'THICK CONCRETE SIDEWALK AT ALL RESIDENTIAL DRIVEWAYS. TUCK UNDER GARAGE (TUG) 2.PROVIDE EXPANSION JOINT MATERIAL AT 100'MAX SPACING AND 8' SPACING FOR TRAWLED JOINTS. 3.PROVIDE EXPANSION JOINT MATERIAL ALONG BOTH EDGES OF WALK, 4 NOT TO SCALE WHERE WALK OS CONTAINED BETWEEN FIXED OBJECTS. C6O2 DETACHED TOWNHOME SHEET NUMBER 4.JOINT SPACING SHALL BE EVERY 8'. tt.A=octotot 2%=4 TYPICAL PRIVATE cmw ac�5t f01s C602 CONCRETE STREET SECTION WALK SECTION J � � I d4 I I I I ENGINEERING ---I ! \_ f EXISTING PLANT] GS TO REMAIN ON NORT PROPERTY LINE SURVEYING ENVIRONMENTAL a I O T �-- / PR POSED TREES TO BE FIEID-SITED TO AUGMENT EXI TING PLANTINGS PLANNING ------ �—.�� �� I'� EVS,INC. 10250 Valley View Road, te 123 sotat.5 --��. Eden Prairie,Minne56344 Phone:952-646-0236 —' .�—. -- w .ev-eng co 0 vvvvvv.evs�ng.com If a, N5'38'4 s y Preliminary PUD ° S III I II I - L _ I CLIENT y 16 F� i o \s I I — \ ark =�j 17 /� i Lakewest Development ��---- � 9�/� PROJECT ,- - - -- - Laurel Pond (J I 1 J ��, 10 , III I 15 I , I rt LOCATION 18 f r —I Golden Valley, MN °> - _ 1 _h I - � Ln I�; ffi I I SHEET Landscape Plan V4 (51 19 °\ I I � A--A-- N— I I 1 r I \\ I zo - I J• I v 2 I - - ��--- - - -- # DATE REVISION 657.97 0 — I FIR NE NOTES: oMRRa15 TREES LANDSCAPE LEGENDAbies concakx CONCALOR FIR 6' HT. - N1910M NYE 5� , Q,Y, RF]IIIU6 �� R 6' HT. — 1. TREE AND SHRUB SYMBOLS ARE SHOWN GRAPHICALLY � TREEs Picea abler EENORWAY SPRUCE 6• HT. 2 ON THE PLAN AND IN THE LEGEND AND NOT LABELED. SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAIS S PLAN, Acer X finemanii'AF+1' FIREFALL MAPLE 2.5 BB 11 BLACK HILLS SPRUCE SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY �-y Picea glauco denaata DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I i F Thuja occidentolis'Rushmore' RUSHMORE ARBORVITAE 6' HT. 12AM A DULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE 12• BEI y CLUMP FORM 2. SEE SHEET L2 FOR SHRUB & PERENNIAL COUNTS AT ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF v/ Betula Nigm RIVER BIRCH pinus strobe6, 4 T Arabia, ��SNEWE THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. HE POND. aRW'MENIN.TREES Kathleen O'Connell Gledits,'a tdcanthos vor.inennis SKYLINE HONEYLOCUST 2.5" BB 9 DATE 10/1&2014 'Skycole Syringo rticulata'Ivory Silk' NORM SILK JAPANESE TREE UTAC 6' BB 22 CLUMP FO 3. ALL TREES AND SHRUBS ALONG EAST PROPERTY LIN REGISTRATION NUMBER 20862 Quercus rubra NORTHERN RED OAK 2.5" BB 8 Melee'PmiriRre PRARIFIRE CRAB 6' BB 17 CLUMP FORM COUNTED THIS SHEET. ® Males'Red Jewel' RED JEWEL CRAB 6' BB 4 CLUMP FORM DRAWN BY CHECKED BY Thin americana'McKSentry' SENTRY LINDEN 2.5" BB – oEt,xx U,SHRs wAST PROPERTY LINE KO KO Syringo vulgaris'ChanCHARLES JOLY ULAC /5 CONT. 9es Joly' DATE PROJECT O Tdia cordata UTTLELEAF LINDEN 2.5" BB 9 coNr. ao 10.16.2014 2011-03 . Syringo vulgoris'KrasaYbo Moskvy' BEAUTY OF MOSCOW UTAC 15 SHEET NUMBER p IN 60 E DENOTES EXISTING TREE SCALE N FEET r I lij LAWN _ _ / _ -- - L_ ENGINEERING — — — — — -- SURVEYING ENVIRONMENTAL \ \ PLANNING \ ---____ ----- o ---------- EVS,INC. ,y^/ ("(0 10250 Valley View Road,Suite 129 LAWN ! Yo LJ p Eden PraiPhonen952-646-0nesota 236 O IIIJJJ w.e 2-646-0290 www.evs¢ng.com — --- d. 00 —. Preliminary PUD / CLIENT Lakewest Development /Z/ BIOFILTRATI( Laurel Pond i LOCATION BOTTOM Golden Valley, MN ---------\ SHEET LAWN HWL=8 Pond Area Enlargement O \- \ \-------------' — — \✓ _ 1� aJII \Jf D�I 1�°011 % l l 1N D OT 328 INFILTRATION POND SEED MI; IT DATE REVISION LAWNiT { ATER COU LAWN .��C�M ST a, N & OqgX B ��DGES / P sKaues a I't1a:T11m5 a ran LANDSCAPE LEGEND C.NRERa15 TREES _ 5 CONT. - �M"MME — Ralf an. R� Abies concolor CONCOLOR FIR S' HT O Camua albasiWriw'Red Gnome' REDNOME DOGWOOD + I� BafANG1L NME DEAalOvs TREES Picea shies NORWAY SPRUCE 6' HT. - Hydrangea arborexena'Ahetwo" INCREDIBALL HYDRANGEA +5 Com' 4 Acer X freemanii'AF+1' FIREFALL MAPLE 2.5� BB 11 6' HT. 6 Picea gloats densato BLACK HILLS SPRUCE _ /-� 1n 1 Rosa'ChamObi^ CWVAPWN ROSE +2 CONT. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, { . ` Thuja occiderda6a'Rushmore' RUSHMORE ARBORWTAE 6 HT. 12 SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT MY WAS Betub Nigra RNER BIRCH 12 BB 3 V,jQ WH(1E PINE 6 �• 5 o PREPARED E VI IO UNDER4A �F Mr.atrabus Weiyeb florid.•Dark Ham DARE(HORSE WEIGEIA +5 Com' � DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I 0 — AM A DULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF a0"ERML TREES Gbditaia triconthoe var.inertnia SKYLINE NONEYLOCUST 2.5- BB 9 DWARF NORWAY SPRUCE +5 CONT. - THE STATE OF MINNESO '$kycole Picea shies'Pumib' Syringa reticulata'Ivory Silk' NORY SILK JAPANESE TREE LILAC 6' BB 22 CLUMP FORM Kathleen O'Connell Quercus rubra NORTHERN RED OAK 2.5 8 Malua'Prairifire' PRARFIRE CRAB 6' BB 17 CLUMP FORMO Nepeto faasenil'Walkers Lar' WAVER'S LOW CATMINT +I COAL 4 DATE 1011612014 - REGISTRATION NUMBER 20861 ® CRAB Malus'Red Jewel' RED JEWEL 6' BB 4 CLUMP FORM Daylilly Mix SUNDAY GLOVES,SOUTH SEAS, +1 CONT. - Tilia americana'McKSentry' SENM LINDEN 2 ® STELA SUPREME.'5- BB DLa0.smlES—1 RaorLRly'UNE NOTES: DRAWN BY CHECKED BY Syringo wigaris'Charles JoV CHARLES'IDLY LILAC +5 COM. 9 1. TREE AND SHRUB SYMBOLS ARE SHOWN GRAPHICALLYKO KO O TiGa crordata LfT11ELFAF LINDEN 2.5 BB 9 Syringo vulgaris"Klaaavitea Moakvy' BEAUTY OF MOSCOW I1LAC +5 CONT- 29 ON THE PLAN AND IN THE LEGEND AND NOT LABELED. DATE PROJECT# 2. SEE SHEET L1 FOR TREE COUNT& SHRUB COUNT AT N 10.16.2014 2011-038.1 THE EAST PROPERTY LINE. ° 5 SHEET TvuMSEx E DENOTES EXISTING TREE SCALE IN FEET 3. ALL SHRUBS & PERENNIALS AT POND COUNTED THIS L2 SHEET. I ON CENTER SPACING AS STATED ON PLAN ENGINEERING PLANTING SOIL MIXTURE (SEE SPEC.) SURVEYING 3-4"MULCH ENVIRONMENTAL FINISHED GRADE PLANNING EVS,INC. _PLANT ACCORDING TO 10250 Valley View Road,Suite 123 _ SHRUBS ON THIS PLAN TINGDETAIEden Prairie,Minnesota SSJdd Phone:952-6460236 TE Fax:952-646-0290 NOMruvw.evscng.com 3 MASS PLANTING BED PLANTING BED MIXED LANDSCAPE WORK TO BE COMPLETED AFTER FINISH L2 NOT TO SCALE GRADING IS COMPLETED BY OTHERS. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR WILL VISIT THE SITE BEFORE Y SUBMITTING A BID TO FULLY UNDERSTAND SITE CONDITIONS. Preliminary PUD ALL PLANTS AND MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE ='LEMBLY OPTIONALBU' LATEST EDITION OF THE AMERICAN STANDARD FOR SSUMES FULL NURSERY STOCK, AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN. CLIENT 1. SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF HOLE PRIOR Y FOR MAINTAININGLakewest Development TO PLANTING B POSITION FOR THEHE GUARANTEE PERIOD PROJECT 2. TRIMOUTDEADWOODANDWEAKAND/OR /� r PLAN ALL TREE TRUNKS SHALL BE SURROUNDED BY A MINIMUM 1 DEFORMED TWIGS.DO NOT CUTALEADER. GUYASSEMBLY-16"POLYPROPYLENE Laurel Pond DO NOT PAINT CUTS. OR POLYETHYLENE(40 MIL)1-1/2"WIDE - I OF 2 FOOT RADIUS WITH 3" THICK SHREDDED HARDWOOD STRAP(TYP)DOUBLE STRAND 10 GA. MULCH. 3. SET PLANT ON UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL OR WIRE,2-7"ROLLED STEEL POSTS B" 2-PLY RUBBER HOSE LOCATION THOROUGHLY COMPACTED BACKFILL SOIL. (MnDOT 3401)@ 180'O.C.(SEE STAKING - DOUBLE STRAND 12 GAUGE WIRE INSTALL PLANT SOTHE ROOT FLARE IS ATOR DIAGRAM) G COVERED W/2-PLY RUBBER HOSE ALL PLANTS WILL BE GUARANTEED FOR FULL REPLACEMENT Golden Valley, MN UP T02"ABOVE THE FINISHED GRADE, PAINTED FLUORESCENT ORANGE A MINIMUM OF AT LEAST TWO FULL GROWING SEASONS COORDINATE STAKING SHEET 4, PLACE PLANT IN PLANTING HOLE WITH TO INSURE UNIFORM 600 DAYS AFTER INSTALLATION ON SITE. BURLAP AND WIRE BASKET,(IF USED),INTACT. ORIENTATION OF GUYi WHITE FLAGGING (TYP.) Landscape Plan BACKFILL WITHIN APPROXIMATELY IT OF THE 120" 120" LINES AND STAKES -� TREE WRAP TOP OF FOOTBALL,WATER PLANT.REMOVE IF THE CONTRACTOR FEELS THERE MAY BE AN ERROR, TOP 1/3 OF THE BASKET OR THE TOP TWO120 HORIZONTAL RINGS,WHICHEVER IS 4 INCHES MULCH HE/SHE IS REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE LANDSCAPE GREATER.REMOVE ALL BURLAP AND NAILS STAKING DIAGRAM 4 INCH DEEP SAUCER ARCHITECT. FROM TOP 1/3 OF THE BALL.REMOVE ALL i 8' STEEL TEE POST- 3 REQUIRED AT 120' TWINE. GUY WIRE WITH WEBBING � - FLAGGING-ONEPERWIRE Z BACKFILL MIX PLANT SYMBOLS SHOWN ARE FOR LOCATING THE POSITIONS 5, PLUMB AND BACKFILL WITH BACKFILL SOIL, 4"-6"SHREDDED BARK MULCH FOR PLANTING. SIZES SHOWN DO NOT NECESSARILY 6. WATER TO SETTLE PLANTS AND FILL VOIDS. ANGLE4,STOOD TAKE SET AT DE UNDISTURBED SUBSOIL REFLECT THE TRUE PLANT SIZE EITHER AT TIME OF INSTALLATION OR WHEN FULL GROWN. 7. WATER WITHIN TWO HOURS OF _ EXISTING GRADE REMOVE BURLAP & ROPE INSTALLATION.WATERING MUST BE _ FROM TOP 1/3 OF THE BALL MINIMUM ill WIDTH OF ROOT BALL LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR WILL REPAIR ALL DAMAGE TO SUFFICIENT TO THOROUGHLY SATURATE ROOT BALL AND PLANTING HOLE. PLANTING SOIL MIXTURE(SEE SPEC.) PROPERTY FROM INSTALLATION ACTIVITIES AT NO ADDITION —� 8. PLACE MULCH WITHIN 48 HOURS OF THE IMIR IUIRIII III - - UNDISTURBED OR STABILIZED NOTE: SEE PLANTING NOTES FOR THE TYPE OF MULCH MATERIAL TO USE. EXPENSE TO THE PROPERTY OWNER. SECOND WATERING UNLESS SOIL MOISTURE VIII Qf AAAI INIigIJ�d SUBSOILS # DATE REVISION IS EXCESSIVE, DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT SHALL APPROVE FINAL B CONIFEROUS TREE PLANTING 2 LAYOUT FOR SHRUBS AND LAWN AREAS. L2 NOT TO SCALE L2 NOT TO SCALE -- PLANTING NOTES I KL PUNTS MU ST BE HEALTHY,VIGMWSMATEMAL.FREEOFPEST6AND DISEASE AND BE CONTAINER GROWN OR BALLED MID BURLAPPED AS INgGTEDIN THE LANDSCAPE LEGEND 2 ALL TREES MUST BE STRNGHT TRUNKEDANDFULL HEADED AND MEET ALL REOAREMENTS SPECIFIED. 9. THE LANDSCAPE AR REBERVE6 THE RIGHT LO REJECT ANY PLAN TS W ARE DEEMS MI SATISFACTORY BEFORE WRING.OR AFTER INSTALUTON NO W.B. lTIWS OFPLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE ACCEPTED UNLESS APPROVED IN VRITING BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 5 ALLPLANTING STOCK SHALLCWFORM TO TPF"AMER,_"A"".IOR NURSERY STOCK'ANa-IDG,LATEST EDTON.CF THEAMERICAN A880GAtI0Na NURSERYMEN.INL AND SHALL CON6TTUTEMIMWM WALItt REWIREMENTS FOR PLANT MATERIALS. 6 MnWTREESANDSHRUBSTOREMNNSHALLBEPROTECTEDTOTHED91PLINEFROMALLCONSTRUCTIONTRAFFICSTORAGEOFMATERIAL.ETCVATSf HTORPNGEPIA3TCSAFEtt FENCINGADEOL'ATELYSUPPORTEDOYSTEELFENCEPOSTSYOCMAAMUMSPACING ATERIALS PRIOR TOINSTALUTON 7 ALL PLANT MATERLAL CLMNTITIES..—,S GF BEDS AN WN,—ONS SHOARE APPRDAMATE CONTRACTOR SAIL BE RESPONMBLE FOR COMPLETE COVERAGE OF ALL PUNTING BEDS AT SPA­ —AND AGLUSTE0 TOCONFORMTOTHEEAACTCONG—SOFTHESIITE THE UNDSCPPE MLHITECT SHML APPROVE THE BTAWNG LOCATION OF ALL PLANT MI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS a KTREESMUSTBEPUNTEO.MVLCNED.ANO—EDASSHOWNINTHEDETNLS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIREC9 ALL PLANTING AREAS MUST BE COMPLETELY MULCHED AS SPECIFIED AMA ULY LICENSEDISION AND SCAPI MULCH.SHREDDED HPRONOODMIACH.CLEAN ANO FREE OFNOA W S WEEDS OP OPER OELETERIWS MPTERIAL.INALL MA93 PUNTING BEDS AND FOR TREES.UNLESS MdCATEDAS ROCK MULCM ON d9ALNNGS.SUBMIT SAMPLE TO LAND8GPE MCHITECT PRIOR TO DELIVERY ONSITE FOR APP9OVAL DELVER MULCH ON WY OF INSTALLATION.USE P FOR TREE5.9HRUB BEGS AND Y FOR PEPENNIALIGROUNO COVER BEDS,UNLE590THER'M9E PRE AMA DULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE HE 10 tj HE PLAN TALES PRECEDENCE WER THE LANDSCAPE LEGEND IF OSCREPANCIES EAST THE SPECIFICATIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER THE PLANTING NOTES AND GENERAL NOTES ARCHITECT UNDER MINNESOTA. OF 12 THEWNT CTORSHALLBERESPONSIBLEFORALLMULCHE6AWPI.MRINGSOILOWINTITIESTOCOMPLETETHEWORKBHOWNONTHEPLAN.VERIFYALLOUAMnIESSHOWNGNTH GSCAPELEGEN0 THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 19 LONYTERM STORAGEOFMATERIA.—SUPPLIES ON-SITE WILL NOT BEALLOWED L 14 TNECONIRALTOR SHALL W£P PAVEMENTS.PIANTER6 AND BULLONGe 0.EANM1D lBISTNNEO ALL PEDEeTRIPN AND VEHICLE ACCESS TO BE MNMANED THRWGHWTLONSTRUCTION PERIOD ALWASTES SHALL BE PitOMPTLY REMOVEDFROM THE SITE ANY"A"'BTOCAL NOTgµ}EpW WY OF DELIVERY SHALL BE HEELED IN INDWATEREOUNIL INBTALLATON.PLANTS NOT MNMNNEDIN TMS MNfER wLL BE REJECTW PNY DAMAGE TO FASTING FACIVTES SHALL BE PEPAVEDAi THECWTRACTO Kathleen O'Connell IXPENeE DATE 10116/2014 15 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FON CgAPLYING WTTM ALL APPLICABLE CODES,REGULATIONS.AND PERMITS GOVERNING THE YMRK REGISTRATION NUMBER 20862 Is THE CONTACTORSALL UTIRESPONSIBLE FOR CON INLI. VATS TIEOWNERFORPROPWETARYUTILMEBANDGOFHERSTATEONECALLATISAAW(l NCIT)ESMETPOARFA)ORBDG26 llOiGRFATERMINNESOTA)IgHWF3BEFOR.d ING.CONTRACTORS BERE&PO B%EFORTHEPROTELTONMIO REPNROFANYDAMAGESTO BANE NOTIFY THE WJ0.SCAPEARLMTELT OFANI'LONFUCTe tO FACILRATE PLANT RELOCATION UTIES YS NT� BEDS 17.USEANTI-0 S'C T(WILTPRIIFORAPPROVEDEWAL)ONDECIWOUSPUNTSMOVEDINLEAFANDFOR EVFAGREENS MOVED MIYTIME APPLY AS PER MMIUFALTlx1ER'S IN6TRUCTON ALL EVERGREENS SHALL BE SPRAYED IICAION E TYPEB ELECT TOPOTECMON WRINALL BE FREE PERIOD. 16 PIANTINO SOL TREES.eM9UBb AND GRWND COVE RS.FERTILEFlIA LOMICONTNNINGAUOERALANOLMTOFHUMUSANOCAPABLEOFSUSTNNINGNGORWSRANTGRow"ITSHALLCOMPLYwTHMMDOTSPEGFlCATON 98771YPE85ELECT TOPSgI MIXTURE SHALL BE FREE FROM HAROPPCK SUBSOL.STONES.CHEMICALS.NOAWSNEEDb.ETC.SOILMIXNRE 9HMLHAVEAPH BETNEEN 8.I ANDT5ANO1GIG10 FERTILIZER Ai INERAhOF9POUN0.R PEP CIRIC YARd IN PLMITING INCORPORATE THIS MIXTURE THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE BEO BY ROTOTIWNGINOTHE TOP 1TOF SOL DRAWN BY CHECKED BY 19 ALL PUNTS SHALL BE GUARANTEED FOR ING CoMpLETE GPOMNG SEASON IAPRIL 1-NOVEMBER I).UNLESS OTHEPYASE SPECIFIED THE GUARANTEE SHALL COVER THE RAL COST OF PEPUCEMEM INCLUDING LABOR AND PLANTS 2D.CONTRACTd SIPLLNOTIFV EUNDBCAPEARCHITECTATLEAST90AYSPRIORTOR NFDDELNERY THECWTMCTORSH4LNO THEUNOBWEARCIIITECTATIF WHOURSINPIT/ANCEOFBEGINMNGR INSTALLATION KO KO 21 SEASONSRIJUI EOOFPLANINGNOOTE THE CONTRACTOR MAY ELECT TO PLANT IN SBASON9 ENTIRELY AT HI&1£R RISK DEOGWDATE POTTED PLANTS DATE PROJECT# A.DECIDUOUS BIUB APRIL 14UNE I;AUG.2INOV.1 EVERGREEN POTTED PLANTS 10.16.2014 2011-03 . APISL IJUNE 1'.AUG 21 OCT, EYERGREENS6B ANDMNNTANEGU PIL IHMY I5'.AUG. E­' 1S _ SHALL BE �pNMERLGI ASSUME MNNOTENANCE REY3PON31BIELEBROAEVE THE LIE CWITRACTOR BH4LL CONTINUE TWO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR KEEP HG THE TREENIL THE S LAMB ITNOI.GHIX1f THEGWPANIEE PERIWAL�INSPECTI0N H430EEN MADE,AND PLANTINGSMEACCEFTED IX0.U&VE OF THE GUARPNTEE MNNTENANCE SHALL INCLUDE WATERING.O0.TNATNO.MULCHING.REMOVAL OF DEPDMATERIALS.RESETTING PLANTS TO PROPER ORMEANDKEEPING PLANT31NA RUMS POSITION AF1EN TE 29 ANY PUNT MATERIAL WHICH dE3.TURNS BROWN.OR pEFWOTE6 PRIOR TOTOTAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK)SHALL BE PROMPRY REMOVED FROM THE SITE AND REPLACED VATS MATERIAL OF THE SAME SPECIES.OUPNTItt.AND SIZE AND MEETING ALL UNOB VJE LEGEND SPEGFIUTIONB SHEET NUMBER N WATERINT MATERIAL A WATERING TURNSBRO ,O NDEFTMONWGHLY WATER ALL PIANTSONLEAWEEK.INE%TREMELY HOT.GFY THER.WATERMOREOFTENASREOUREDBy,NGC GNSOF HEATSTRE33SUCH—LING LEAVES CHECKMOISTUREUIGERMULDIFRIORTOWATERING LOOETERMIIVE NEED CGNTMCTOR SH4L MIJfE THE NECE964RY MRPNGEMEMB FOR•NATER 25 CONTRACTOR SHALL REOIEST INWFITING.A—ACCEPTANCE INSPECTION M SEED �3 ALL DSTLRSED AREAS TO BE SEEDED ARE TO Re.-Y TOP SCIL. .MULCH.ANDWATER UNTIL A HEALTHY STAND OF GRASS IS OBTNNEO moa•waa„yasyduedma�pussmm•mmm � R � £61Z-£S9-ZS6 MISSOc� 0 S ey udauH 9££ < ZSOZ-699-Z19 <0S4£SS KK`-P—U-w z ZOLaimS•L G1"HSZS4T S10311HO � t juawdolana0 ISOM O�Ej Lz ° ANdW008 S113M Z `^V' 6 n JN m wh N Zm o= J g o z i p > J a w < < w Q p S 0 '04 o Z a F o d www < Q Q �O w N n LL S N Z > Q Z N = zi Q ''^L^ 0 zA V W [ ( Z LL ti U LL 1G�? u[d w (� d g d [EB—1Z w C7 O o Z � u a ca Lu _ uj o w g F Z vwi w U) z O� 08 W 5 g Q� O� U) cr ' � rn Lu - LU p � w Oo w �_I ( - o :D L zm p n J z LL El 6i ® k. z ® ® �a EJ 0 =h d yy� 5 L� c,Y f r�4Z �yJ JJJ20B E3 a 9 Z ku 7- -I M V(� A a F4 IB: _-- o L 1 _ FBI o0 = ® s -- i -- d < Q BDDz I = 1 f I x l . o < -�,— �,— o O D DLu N ' I . IxI z _ o ODD w5 ADD LL o 0 Lu LL a Y ' U m zo � ., TL Ow W 3AV l3sn'dl 1 _ _� r J zw 7 a � s� z z x 3 RIA �. ,�- - �►- ,. �1 i uY ....... _ 1°inii' ' c,iim i•Si iiw . • .•• ®i®' I; • •• - ....❑,�".' i ni:�oi�_.---.--- -- -..�nunmmm I umm . mm�m A\V, .1��►. �„�.Nn. gym:,\ _0== I'�II�I==I�IL�I=e o — --'--� ► n.mn.m.n.Nn,;;n,� all I I _ c a� ELEVATION 2 ELEVATION 1 d O — — PENNSYLVANIA AVE > N N M a �•ICD —#2 #8 � #9 #Id # I— � 17 — 7 #24 d ¢ 1 #7 #10 — #15 #18 23 !3 pY 63 #3 Y #d #11 #14 _ — _ —i— — #19CD #4 — #22 1 -�IL 45 #12 #13 #20 — CzJ KEY PLAN-FOR REFERENCE ONLY 4N ' � L� a °e k t/� ppE 12 O LU c 6 10 28'-U'REFERENCE LINE U F- 2 " a S 27,_6.,SHOWNTO C-0 av° MIDPOINT OF TRUSSN = 4 8 W Q 4 — a� -__� _ ::[�/�..:: ❑ - ', THE GRADE TO MIDPOINT ' T m,.,.a,..a....d.. F TRUSS LOESS TTHOAN 28'-U' ds One PROJECT TITLE' Laurel Pon — Subdivision I - _ 345 Pennsylvania Ave S Golden Valley,MN 55426 GRADE 0 LAUREL CURVE LOT#14 LOT#13 SHEET TITLE: LOT#15 FRONT HOUSE ELEVATIONS LOT#16 PUBLIC STREET INTERIOR PRIVATE ROAD STREET ELEVATIONS PENNSYLVANIA AVE LAUREL CURVE TYP.FRONT HOUSE ELEVATIONS FACING LAUREL CURVE ROOF DORMER OPTION �A3 SCALE'.I/a'=I'l1'when pnnleC on Ti'x3a"paper PROJECT#: 01-2014 ROOF DORMER ? ROOF DORMER _ 29 REFERENCE UNE ---- ---27'{p-6"SHOWN TO DRAWN BY: WELLS o> MIDPOINT OF TRUSS CHECKED W. WELLS ISSUE DATE: 0 � OF THE GRADE TO MIDPOINT ROOF TRUSS MUST BE LESS THAN 28'-0" Lu .I seer CeN1y 0016ua perlfcatim—WPacamC and ar under my CreulaupaMsion aneamryiepielema -=.d=laws =1 _ GRADE 9 L 9� — 1101-41� Wleam M.W.U. pbe: R9.no. 49515 L PUBUCSTREET LOT#8 OT#7 LOT#6 LOT#5 ROOF DORMER OPTION SHEET NO: PENNSYLVANIA AVE LAUREL PONT 2 TYP.FRONT HOUSE ELEVATION-FACING LAUREL POINT A3. 1 SUIP l/6"=1'{P wM1en printeC°n 22'x 3('pnPer FOR ZONING APPROVAL ONLY- NOTE:FINAL HOME DESIGNS PRESENTED BY BUILDER MAY DIFFER SLIGHTLY FROM THESE PLANS C N Q O N V PENNSYLVANIA AVE > rn ELEVATION 1 —`�—"�_ Q N • #1 y #8 #9 #16 #17 #2 #24 3 #7 #10 #15 #18 G) a 4le #3 #23 z S p6 #il #14 #19 J #4 #22 #5 #12 #13 #20 #21 zU E �N < � 9 KEY PLAN-FOR REFERENCE ONLY U 0 w N<� U H '� 06 Nz S 2 -j U J 15-0' ti Q SETBACK m. II DISTANCE BETWEEN � � °£J� \10 — — — _-- -—12 28-0"REFERENCE LINE L3UfePROJEITPonds One HOUSES,TYP. ', T ;� -- - 2T-6"MIDPOINT OF TRUSS Subdivision 345 Pennsylvania Ave S OF OOFTHE OTRUOSS MIDPMUSTO ET Golden Valley,MN 55426 .� � _ LESS THAN 28'-0" REAR RHOUSE ELEVATIONS `e m _ SHEET TITLE: 0 LAUREL CURVE I TWO STORY PORCH UPGRADE.WITH I ONE STORY SCREEN PORCH UPGRADE. I SMALL DECK UPGRADE SIDE YARD FOR END UNI I PENNSYLVANIAAVE SMALL DECK ATTACHED TO MASTER BEDRM. p PROPERTY LINE OF REAR L J TO WITHIN 8'-0"OF REAR PROPERTY LINE — — L— — — — -- -- — — — — FULLFINISHED BASEMENT UPGRADE OPTION AVAILABLE FOR ALL UNITS SCREEN PORCH WITH BONUS ROOM ABOVE LOT 15 LOT 16 PROJECT p; 01-201 LOT 13 a LOT 14 ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING UPGRADE AVAILABLE FOR ALL UNITS DRAWN BY: WELLS CHECKED BY: WELLS REAR HOUSE ELEVATIONS-SHOWING OPTIONAL UPGRADES ISSUE: DATE: A4 SCAIF'.1/@'=1'4'whan protea o�Tl's 3d'papa I MaeyceeayNtltua plan apeeakNm p repala2s pmpNe ey me a a�mr mr area aupemaon ane mtl i am a nuy Iprstam armeatl vnearma r.'a eypF Minnesota signm'1'6041�� W II—M.Wells,Ardikecl etle�pp. 4961549615 SHEET NO: A4 FOR ZONING APPROVAL ONLY- NOTE:FINAL HOME DESIGNS PRESENTED BY BUILDER MAY DIFFER SLIGHTLY FROM THESE PLANS -- -� LAUREL PONDS ONE P. U . D. NO. 117 C.R.DOC.NO. -NE COR.OF NE 1/40F 778.56 NW 1/4 SEG 5 E.LINE OF HE I/4 OF NW 114 SEC.5--= rW Oa _>Inl r�nl nhllnl UNE PARALLEL MOTH w i\II v\lJ- vVL.VIVInL. N.LINE F O zZ r�nNlr\' Anr�IT'Inxl NE IA OF NW I/4-'� ZLL vLVV VV PnVVII IVIV O r PINCHED PIPE a 54.14 LINENE Of EL WITH 45.66 NW.E LINE Of Pill 66.69 64.72 _ NE 1!40F NW 1/1 SB9'50'33'E a T- 'EASEMENT FOR THE 7ggNSMI 1 \ } -___--___--'' �- SJrO 38'44,7,, ENERGY PFA DOO.N0.3212116 ON OF ELECTRIC ;J' 19.8fi a n4'Y 6J�7..97 RI, ____ n �S ENERGY PERK THE TRANSMISSION OF ELECTRI _______323.195 - _-- _ t/\ DOC NO 3212117 CAL --- r FOUND 1/2"OPEN /1� - 'END IRON PIPE mLL i -<r r• 199.10 I __45.21 3 i pDRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT 55------- ARE SHOWN THUS: > ------50_____ (NO SCALE) N OUTLOT B <` - N ai Q3� iw C) LU �- w UJ Q 6� iaN 111 m r r ' I w o a'$ g J Lid _� 1 BEING 5 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJOINING OUTLOT \Y � I O �- � LINES.UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED,AS b, N �i� € SHOWN ON THE PLAT. \ 0 N o N <L J ss°36 erw sz.7s p �i w Q 15 'g � JO LIJ i o� DRAINAGE r\> �<vr I O e W CC) IJ/ ANo unury / y J <z Z _D GRAPHIC SCALE 15 EASEMENT 2 w _ — / DRAINAGE- '__I_ Qw r 30 I 7I 3I 60 0 AND UTILITY r D o n - 9275 o EASEMENTI Scale MmmmmL- in Feet - I10 ----45_-_-- DRAINAGE , THE ORIENTATION OF THIS BEARING SYSTEM IS o -IRON PIPE w/CAP AND UTILITY I BASED ON THE WEST LINE OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE NW , " I STAMPED EASEMENT-, 1/4 SEC 5 TWP.117N,RGE.21 W,WHICH IS 'RLS 4741' --EASTR �I o i Ow LINE FOR I ASSUMED TO BEAR N 05"E.44'E. �t 100.00 m r-\r„ 658.34 N5° �- PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE _- �.\SEPTI-1v 38'44"E o — — — -- -- -- - tviv - J 125.21 � _ �--- 55 � 40T9='-WE LINE OFTHE _ 45.21 -_ NW1%OF ECTION6 1/40F THE I��L-NV h I^\/) \ /A NII A �� �_- DTrnAI ■LEGEND _— LrVVL, I IVIV o I _ V�% I L.V A 1 'C-1\I i I " O DENOTES IRON MONUMENT SET W,' _ n V L_I V V L --� -� _ CAP STAMPED"RLS 44076' 0 DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND r'I IY n i n KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS:Laurel Pond,LLC,a Minnesota limited liability company,owner n i '-- _ of the following described property situated in the County of Hennepin,State of Minnesota,to wit: That part of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 5-117-21,Hennepin County,Minnesota i v V n n n rTi described as follows: V l r'v i That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 5,Township 117,Range 21, ' Count Minnesota described as follows: Commencing at a point on the East line of said Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 distant 648.0 feet Hennepin y, , South of the Northeast corner thereof;thence West parallel with the North line of said Northeast 1/4 of a Michael Li Williams,do hereby r in ththat this plat was prepared this me or under my direct supervision;that I RESIDENT AND REAL ESTATE SERVICES,Hennepin County,Minnesota am a duly Licensed Land Surveys in the State of Minnesota;That this plat is a correct representation of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, the Northwes[1/4adistance of 1100 feet,more or less too point distant 250.30 feet East from the boundary survey;that all mathematical data and labels are correctly designated on this plat;that all monuments (hereby certify that taxes payable in 20—and prior years have been paid for land described on this plat Commencing at a point on the East line of said No Q — 20 778.58 feet South of the Northeast corner thereof;thence West parallel with the North line of said West line of said Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest l/4 as measured along said parallel line,said point depicted on the plat have been,or wig be correctly set within one year;that all water boundaries and wet lands, dated this—day of Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter to its intersection with a line drawn parallel with and being the actual point of beginning of the tract to be hereby described;thence North parallel with the as degned in Minnesota Statutes,Section 505.01,Subd.3,as of the date of this certificate are shown and labeled distant 250.3 feet East of the West line of said Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter as West line of said Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 a distance of 54.14 feet;thence West parallel with on this plat;and all public ways are shown and labeled on the plat. Mark V.Chapin.County Auditor measured along a line parallel with the North line of said Northeast Quarter of the Northwest the North line of said Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 a distance of 250.3 feet to the West line of 20_ Quarter;said point being the actual point of beginning of the tract to be described;thence North said Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4;thence South along the West line of said Northeast 1/4 of the Dated this_day of parallel with the West line of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter a distance of 84.72 Northwest 1/4 a distance of 100 feet;thence East parallel with the North line of said Northeast 1/4 a By .Deputy feet;thence West parallel with the North line of said Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter a the Northwest 1/4 a distance of 250.30 feet;thence North parallel with the West line of said Northeast distance of 250.3 feet to the West line of said Quarter-Quarter,thence South along the West line of 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 a distance of 45.86 feet to the actual point of beginning,Hennepin County, Michael R.Williams,Licensed Land Surveyor said Quarter-quarter a distance of 407.915 feet;thence East parallel with the North line of said Minnesota. Minnesota License No.44076 SURVEY DIVISION,Hennepin County,Minnesota QuarterQuarter a distance of 250.3 feet;thence North parallel with the West line of said Pursuant to Minnesota Statute Section 3838.565(1969),this Plat has been approved this day of Quarter-Quarter a distance of 323.195 feet to the actual point of beginning.Except the Westerly 30 Has caused the same to be surveyed and planed as LAUREL PONDS ONE P.U.D.NO.117 and does hereby 20— feet thereof,according to the United States Government Survey thereof and situate in Hennepin dedicate to the public for public use forever the easements for drainage and utility purposes and easements for STATE OF MINNESOTA County,Minnesota. utility purposes as shown on this plat COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND In witness whereof said Laurel Pond,LLC,a Minnesota limited liability company,has caused these presents to This instrument was acknowledged before me this—day of .2014,by Michael R. Chris F.Mavis,County Surveyor be signed by its proper odioars this_day of ,20_ Williams. By That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 5,Township 117,Range 21, Hennepin County,Minnesota,described as follows: Signed:Laurel Pond,LLC,a Minnesota limited liability company. Signature of Notary Notary'c Printed Name By ,Its Chief Manager Notary Public,Hennepin County,Minnesota COUNTY RECORDER, Commencing at a point on the East line of said Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter,distant Curt Fretham 778.58 feet South of the Northeast corner thereof;thence West parallel with the North line of said My Commission Expires January 31,20—. Hennepin County,Minnesota Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter to its intersection with a line drawn parallel with and STATE OF MINNESOTA I hereby certify that this plat of LAUREL PONDS ONE P.U.D.NO.117 was recorded in this 0 ic0 this distant 250.30 feet East of the West line of Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter as COUNTY OF GOLDEN VALLEY,MINNESOTA day of ,20_,at_o'clock_.M. measured along a line parallel with the North line of said Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter;thence South parallel with said West line of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest This instrument was acknowledged before mean this_day o1 ,20_,by Cun Quarter a distance of 323.195 feet to the actual point of beginning of[he land to be herein This plat of LAUREL PONDS ONE P.U.D.NO.117 was approved and accepted by the City Council of Golden Fretham,Chief Manager of Laurel Pond,LLC,a Minnesota limited liability company on behalf of the company. Valley,Minnesota,at a regular meeting thereof held this day of ,20—.If Martin McCormick.County Recorder described;thenceSouth on said parallel line 199.10 feet,more or less,to the South line of said applicable,the mitten comments and recommendations of the Commissioner of Transportation and the County Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter;thence West along said South line to the West line of Highway Engineer have been received by the City or the prescribed 30 day period has elapsed without receipt of By Deputy said Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter;thence North along said West line to its Signature of Notary Notary's Printed Name such comments and recommendations,as provided by Minnesota Statutes,Section 505.03,Subdivision 2. intersection with a line drawn parallel with the North line of said Northeast Quarter of the Notary Public, County,Minnesota Northwest Quarter from the actual point of beginning:thence East to the actual point of beginning. My Commission Expires January 31,20—. CITY COUNCIL OF GOLDEN VALLEY,MINNESOTA Except the Westerly 30 feet and the Southerly 50 feet thereof,according to the United States Government Survey thereof and situate in Hennepin County,Minnesota. By Mayor ,Clerk ENGINEERING I SURVEYING I ENVIRONMENTAL I PLANNIN AND By G -- - REL PONDS ONE P.U . D. NO. 117 2ND ADDITION C.R.DOC.NO. -NE COR.OF NE 1/4 OF 778'58 i NW1/45EC.5 E.LWE OF HE 1/4 OF i N NW 144 SEC.5---' m nL nnllnl ONE PARALLEL EL WITH ZZ I�lIV�7 vVL.vIVI . N.LINE OF = ^['/`nNln'I AnnITInAi NE 114 OF NW 1/4-'' w JL_v IVU l �V VIIIVIv �144 p 17.59 -LINE PARALLEL WITH 4 4586 ' I -PINCHED PIPE I' W. LINE OF Z i�I 88.89 _Zj� j84.72 I NE 114 OF NW 1/4 I - 100.0 S89'S0'39'E< 79.86��~• - -------- - ---___ S5 038 44'W 657.97----- F,,- NERGVEROR THE TRANSMISSION OF ELECTRIC AL ' S i' ---- 317.43__________________ PLAT OF LAUREL PONDS ONE P.U.D.NO.1/7 ` I--ENSEMENTFOR THE TRANS 329.02 _y __ - II ENERGY PER PLAT OFLAURELIo"OF ELECTRICAL ONOS ONE P.U.D.NO.117 80.05 6,j __ ---�-_/ _ 151_80 _�`.` ,r FOUND 11TO N m _ 21�18 - _``\ __ �o'12.56_82.189.10 _ __4521 i 3 I 2 I 4-ORA] E AND tlNLITV t ,y'3) 5 1 58d'�21'16'E 3 Z EASEMENT A c'b. 11p�j Tl Y R' h w t0 I� - I 10 DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT DRAINAGE-y �- - - 55-- ARE SHOWN THUS: LL�o 0 �F EAND ASEMENT I��, 50_____� (NO SCALE) p g LV L I EASEMENT I Z w �` ______ zy (V J �I 3 -s SS`38'dd•W 89.37 i S63'59.56"W_g r— — — _ 00 m 4 n ¢¢ _o UJI I' 941 )'- V V I U-/l a I-a �- 5 M n'j I 3 R 0o�� �— - - 1� I LIQ W 1 o n - — — J o \ Sw Oa2�- ;� LIJ N I I I OUTLOT A G �— — �g �Z r— 7882N5'38d5•E _-� q �'�� LIQ -j 3 BEING 5 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJOINING OUTLOT fA \ m S5 3e'4a'W W4-2— ___I I�oN I ///��� _r C, �- z LINES,UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED,AS / I aan N %II SHOWN ON THE PLAT. SSS°36.0M=2.75 SI 2 1 I� �a . I- O Liman u"i o: \�✓ L. I� \1 �I a3.31 NS'38_'_41E IqI /tie F �g� f a z I i� - n N �Qg LIJ i C�\\.- L=20.38,R=33.95 •-� y �v� a IU_ �� 1 �y a S N w z 3 I Z _ GRAPHIC SCALE <� 30 0 15 30 60 _ I 92-75 92 I AN Dl93.11 fry Z I w/' EASEMENT-w Sccle in Feet _ _ �i •o y° ` o'er DRAINAGE r I THE ORIENTATION OF THIS BEARING SYSTEM IS `-IRON PIPE W/CAP N5'38'44• I / ? N S ' I AND UTILITY BASED ON THE WEST LINE OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE NW �' I\ STAMPED I E 310.60 0 a 'RLS 4741' o Y _ J �n 9.03 I1 \ - EAST ROW LINE FOR DEME -' -- ASSUMED TO BEAR7N 05G38'44•EWHICH IS L 100.00 / m ----- o �� 584°21'lfi'E-__� _ PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE T/ -- 55------- -- _- �n DT(viv 658.34 N5 38'44-E az.61 a1.7s — — — — 10 ----- 50----- -' -'-- izs.zl - i I �- � 407.92 -_ ^ 44.21 i WEST LINE OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE I' I NW 1AOF SECTION5 �� �NIN1 til tYA Alln �' r�TlnAl _ ■LEGEND L_I v I V I n L_V -- m 1 L I IVI4 ry �- n V L-I V V L_ �- -,`� ) O DENOTES IRON MONUMENT SET W/ CAP STAMPED*RLS 44076" • DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND L_YY r1L_V DIN IN n nn nV VIIIV�v KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS:Laurel Pond,LLC,a Minnesota limited liability company,owner 1,Michael R.Williams,do hereby cattily that this plat was prepared by me or under my direct supervision;that I RESIDENT AND REAL ESTATE SERVICES,Hennepin County,Minnesota 01 the following described property situated in the County of Hennepin,State of Minnesota,to wit: am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor in the State of Minnesota;that this plat is a correct representation o1 the boundary survey;that all mathematical data and labels We correctly designated on this plat;that all monuments I hereby certity that taxes payable in 20_and prior years have been paid for land described on this plat, That part of LOT 1&LOT 2,BLOCK 2 and OUTLOT C,LAUREL PONDS ONE P.U.D.NO.117,Hennepin depicted on the plat have been,or will be correctly eel within one year:that all water boundaries and war lands, dated this_day o1 ,20_ County,Minnesota. as defined in Minnesota Statutes,Section 505.01,Subd.3,as o1 the date of this certificate are shown and labeled on this plat;and al public ways are shown and labeled on the plat Mark V.Chapin,County Auditor Dated this_day of •20_ Has caused the same to be surveyed and platted as LAUREL PONDS ONE P.U.D.NO.117 2ND ADDITION and By Deputy does hereby dedicate to the public for public use forever the easements for drainage and utility purposes and easements for utility purposes as shown on this plat. Michael R.Williams,Licensed Land Surveyor SURVEY DIVISION,Hennepin County,Minnesota Minnesota License No.44076 In witness whereof said Laurel Pond,LLC,a Minnesota limited liability company,has caused these presents to Pursuant to Minnesota Statute Section 3838.565(1969),this Plat has been approved this_day of be signed by its proper officers this_day of ,20_ STATE OF MINNESOTA Signed:Laurel Pond,LLC,a Minnesota limited liability company. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN By ,Its Chief Manager This instrument was acknowledged before me this_day of ,2014,by Michael R. Chris F.Mavis,County Surveyor Curt Fretham Williams. By STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF Signature of Notary Notary's Printed Name Notary Public,Hennepin County.Minnesota COUNTY RECORDER, This instrument was acknowledged before me on this_day of ,20_,by Curt My Commission Expires January 31,20_. Hennepin County,Minnesota Fretham,Chief Manager of Laurel Pond,LLC,a Minnesota limited liability company on behalf of the company. GOLDEN VALLEY,MINNESOTA 1 hereby cartity that this plat of LAUREL PONDS ONE P.U.D.NO.1172ND ADDITION was recorded in this office this_day of 20L_,at_o'cIock_.M. Signature o1 Notary Notary's Printed Name This plat of LAUREL PONDS ONE P.U.D.NO.117 2ND ADDITION was approved and accepted by the City Notary Public, County,Minnesota Council of Golden Valley,Minnesota,at a regular meeting thereof held this_day of My Commission Expires January 31,20_. ,20_.If applicable,the written comments and recommendations of the Martin McCormick,County Recorder Commissioner of Transportation and the County Highway Engineer have been received by the City or the prescribed 30 day period has elapsed without receipt of such comments and recommendations,as provided by By Deputy Minnesota Statutes,Section 505.03,Subdivision 2. CITY COUNCIL OF GOLDEN VALLEY,MINNESOTA By Mayor AEW By Cleric ENGINEER] ANNING 776.56 ---__T_ REL PONDS ONE P.U. D. NO. 117 3RD ADDITION C.R.DOC.NO, I----NE DOR.OF NE 1,4 OF LA U NW 1;4 SEC.5 E.LINE OF NE 114 OF NW 1/4 SEC.5--= LLO LINE PARALLEL WTTH m W� I\ IV\J .. vVL_VIVnL_2 O r-i\7'\Aln AnnlTlnNlm N.LINE OF �GvVIVV I -LJ IVIV NE1140E NW 1'/ r PINCHED PIPE ± 54.14 m m LINE PARALLEL WITH ` , -- 45.86a� W,LINE OF 2 kk1 88'89 A-- 84.72 II NE1/4 OF NW 1/4 100.0 j C--EASEMENT �- FOR THE T PEE S$o38'44°W 65797 I11 PER PLOT OF P�N3S ISSION OF ELECTRICAL ENERGY LAUREL ONE P.U.O.NO.117 2ND �15 -'�a.48 °i �/ �- I v ADDITION $ 3 1 S30-39'36'W 2000 OUTLOT �� 73.51 _ DRAINAGE AND A 384°21'i6'E / INAGE P'\0" �1� rFOUND t/2'�EN AND UTNTY 4.9e 35°39'3 UTILfTY \1 -- /END IRON PIPE my / -T-- _67.19 126.f01cASEMENT OVER OUTIOi L`38 S21°59'48'E 1 16.04-��\ �� Tom.- �� -_ 7 I}-� EASEMENT _ F O.ate" �^ fi0.92 5�?? u-DRAINAGE aS 0 SS°38'O7w 92.75 PNAND UTILITY a EASEMENT z g I I _ w I 41 4 Y 5 . II nr-v�t1T-111n�Jutty1 III CFrJJ\ `i Ill jowa¢g II ^Q�_ 50- _>_ __ �``ZZ0w DRATNAGE1I AND U5T ILJ TY EAS E MENT O ARE SHOWN THUS t55,6ddW °Ot•7d'w i 5,1 e lm � 'W (NOSCALE)CM 6 G S°l 924- J - Z SE 4w 8.62 F 5 0 oo0 3x.00 O `Jz.7slJ 0 LJ o OLJ U n 15 - acroL I 1 II l O - i BEING 5 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJOINING OUTLOT N LIJ r LINES,UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED,AS 13.01 O SHOWN ON THE PLAT. __1I < NS°38'07•E -- J I V V N kkkCM C >N86°22'23'W I J Z 92.75 I 77 1 1�\L I 31.02 L IN I i v 7 g 2I ' L�\v Jj 7.63 0 SS°38'44'W 84.29 t,0 .2', �T SS°38�gq-aZ.65 .J ` -j __NW 20'23'W IJ 1.I I F- Llr a all �I ,1 6.00 60.27 18.00 00IJ/ 0 A I g 4.55 ' __ ( l I Z _D C GRAPHIC SCALE &,I DRAINAGE 8 N N I N I l - < 60 O 3 11 0 60 120 �- _- AND UTILITY a I / �_ I -J _ EASEMENT- 12 i I 1 DRAINAGE � � C o J gL - P a+ AND UTILITY k 87,13 j J I EASEMENT Scale In Feet -IRON PIPE Wil CAP 6250 ^ L- �I` $ I THE ORIENTATION OF THIS BEARING SYSTEM IS o e 1 STAMPED 1 0 - Z BASED ON THE WEST LINE OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE NW t` ^ 11 'RLS 6741' �� 79.53 1/4,SEC.5 TWP.117N R-3821W W ICH IS l ASSUMED TO BEAR N 05°38'44'E. H 60.00 658.34 N$o 38'44„E a2.e�_ a1.7s ------ 50- __-_ 170.43T " 1 �407.92_- T ' WEST ONE OF THE NE 1140E THE ��f-n °- lnl^\/ �� r�DTluNl I ■LEGEND NW1140E SECTION 1 L_1 VI V" I L_1V A\r-\ IVIv m V i O DENOTES IRON MONUMENT SET W/ --L CAP STAMPED"RLS 44076' �- �- DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND l_YVY, \) I `n rn/ vV /'1V nnnllnInl --.� U1r1ICl` KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS:Laurel Pond,LLC,a Minnesota limited liability company.owner I,Michael R.Williams,do hereby cerlity that this plat was prepared by me or under my direct supervision;that I RESIDENT AND REAL ESTATE SERVICES,Hennepin County,Minnesota of the following described property situated in the County of Hennepin,State of Minnesota,to wit: am a duly licensed Land Surveyor in the State of Minnesota;that this plat is a correct representation of the boundary survey;that al mathematical data and labels are correctly designated on this plat;that all monuments I hereby cattily that taxes payable in 20_and prior years have been paid for land described on this plat, depicted on the lat have been,or wil be correctly sal Within one year;that all water boundaries and wet lands, dated this_day of That part of OUTLOT A,LAUREL PONDS ONE P.U.D.NO.117 2ND ADDITION,Hennepin County, p' P Minnesota. as defined in Minnesota Statutes,Section 505.01,Build.3,as of the date of this certificate ere shown and labeled on this plat;and all public ways are shown and labeled on the plat Mark V.Chapin,County Auditor AND20_ Dated this_day of That part of OUTLOT B,LAUREL PONDS ONE P.U.D.NO.117,Hennepin County,Minnesota. By .Deputy Michael R.Williams,Licensed Land Surveyor SURVEY DIVISION,Hennepin County,Minnesota Minnesota License No.44076 Has caused the same to be surveyed and planed as LAUREL PONDS ONE P.U.D.NO.117 3RD ADDITION and pursuant to Minnesota Statute Section 3838.565(1969),this Plat has been approved this_day of does hereby dedicate to the public for public use forever the easements for drainage and utility purposes and Y0_ easements for utility purposes as shown on this plat STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN In witness whereof said Laurel Pond,LLC,a Minnesota limited liability company,has caused these presents to ,2014,b Michael R. Chris F.Mavis,County Surveys be signed by its proper officers this_day of ,20_. This instrument was acknowledged before me this_day of Y Williams.Signed:Laurel Pond,LLC,a Minnesota limited liability company. By By ,Its Chief Manager Signature of Notary Notary's Printed Name Curt Fretham Notary Public,Hennepin County,Minnesota COUNTY RECORDER, My Commission Expires January 31,20_. Hennepin County,Minnesota STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF GOLDEN VALLEY,MINNESOTA I hereby certify that this plat of LAUREL PONDS ONE P.U.D.NO.117 3RD ADDITION was recordedin Is office this_day of ,20_,al_o'cicck_.M. This instrument was acknowledged before me on this_day of '20-,by Curt This plat of LAUREL PONDS ONE P.U.D.NO.117 3RD ADDITION was approved and accepted by the City Fretham,Chief Manager of Laurel Pond,LLC,a Minnesota limited liability company on behaR of the company. Council of Gilden Valley,Minnesota,at a regular meeting thereof held this_day of 20_.If applicable,the written comments and recommendations of the Martin McCormick,County Recorder Commissioner of Transportation and the County Highway Engineer have been received by the City or the Signature of Notary Notary's Printed Name prescribed 30 day period has elapsed without receipt of such comments and recommendations,as provided by By Deputy Notary Public, County,Minnesota Minnesota Statutes,Section 505.03,Subdivision 2. My Commission Expires January 31,20_. CITY COUNCIL OF GOLDEN VALLEY,MINNESOTA By Mayor AEW ANNING BY ,Clerk ENGINEERING(SURVEYING ENVIRONMENTAL(PL ORDINANCE NO. 541, 2ND SERIES AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE Approval of Final Plan of Development Laurel Ponds One P.U.D. No. 117 Lake West Development, LLC, Applicant The City Council for the City of Golden Valley hereby ordains as follows: Section 1. City Code Chapter 11 entitled "Land Use Regulations (Zoning)" is amended in Section 11.10, Subd. 2, and Section 11.55, by approving the Final Plan of Development for Planned Unit Development (P.U.D.) 117 thereby allowing the applicant to construct 24 detached townhome units at 305 & 345 Pennsylvania Avenue South. This PUD is subject to all of the terms of the permit to be issued including, but not limited to the following specific conditions: 1. The plans prepared by EVS, received December 17, 2014, shall become a part of this approval. 2. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Engineering Division to Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager, dated December 16, 2014, shall become a part of this approval. 3. All principal buildings shall conform to the rear and side property setbacks when adjacent to a single family zoning district as outlined in Section 11.55, Subd. 3(C)(1). 4. No buildings shall be located less than fifteen feet from the back of the curb line for roads that are part of the internal road system as outlined in Section 11.55, Subd. 3(C)(2) unless adequate separation is provided through additional landscaping, berming or similar means. 5. The Applicant shall prohibit the installation of fences within the development. 6. Homeowners Association covenants regarding design and building materials shall be reviewed by the City prior to Final Plan approval. 7. All signage must meet the requirements of the City's Sign Code (Section 4.20). 8. Permits to construct parking bays on the property at 7400 Laurel Avenue shall be obtained by that property owner and shall not be located closer than fifteen feet to the side property line, as required in Section 11.47, Subd. 6(B), unless a variance is obtained. 9. Easement agreements related to parking and the retaining wall shall be reviewed by the City and shall be recorded with the Final Plat. 10.A park dedication fee of $17,400, or 2% of the land value, shall be paid before Final Plat approval. 11.The maximum building height, as defined by City Code, shall be 28 feet for the homes on Lots 1-4, 9-12, and 17-20, and 35 feet for the homes on Lots 5-8, 13-16, and 21-24. 12.There shall be no structures located outside of the building envelope area and no variances granted for structures to be located outside of the building envelope area. 13.A Development Agreement signed by the Applicant will outline the timing and terms associated with the demolition of the existing buildings, including the related funds to be held in escrow by the City. 14.The Final Plat shall include "P.U.D. No. 117" in its title. 15.This approval is subject to all other state, federal, and local ordinances, regulations, or laws with authority over this development. In addition the Council makes the following findings pursuant to City Code Section 11.55, Subd. 6(Q): 1. The PUD plan is tailored to the specific characteristics of the site and achieves a higher quality of site planning and design than generally expected under conventional provisions of the ordinance. 2. The PUD plan preserves and protects substantial desirable portions of the site's characteristics, open space and sensitive environmental features including steep slopes, trees, scenic views, creeks, wetlands and open waters. 3. The PUD plan includes efficient and effective use (which includes preservation) of the land. 4. The PUD plan results in development compatible with adjacent uses and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and redevelopment plans and goals. 5. The PUD plan is consistent with preserving and improving the general health, safety and general welfare of the people of the City. 6. The PUD plan meets the PUD Intent and Purpose provision and all other PUD ordinance provisions Section 2. The tract of land affected by this ordinance is legally described as follows: Parcel A: That part of the NE '/4 of the NW '/4 of Section 5, Township 117 Range 21 Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at a point on the East Line of said NE '/4 of the NW '/4 distant 778.58 feet South of the NE corner thereof; thence West parallel with the North line of said NE Y4 of the NW % to its intersection with a line drawn parallel with and distant 250.3 feet East of the West line of said NE 1/4 of the NW '/4 as measured along a line parallel with the North line of said NE % of the NW '/4, said point being the actual point of beginning of the tract to be described; thence North parallel with the West line of the NE % of the NW '/4 a distance of 84.72 feet; thence West parallel with the North line of said NE % of the NW '/4 a distance of 250.3 feet to the West line of said Quarter-Quarter; thence South along the West line of said Quarter-Quarter a distance of 407.915 feet; thence East parallel with the North line of said Quarter-Quarter a distance of 250.3 feet; thence North Parallel with the West line of said Quarter-Quarter a distance of 323.195 feet to the actual point of beginning. Except the Westerly 30 feet thereof, according to the United States Government Survey thereof and situated in Hennepin County, Minnesota. Parcel B: That part of the NE '/4 of the NW % of Section 5, Township 117 Range 21 Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at a point on the East Line of said NE '/4 of the NW 1/4, distant 778.58 feet South of the NE corner thereof; thence West parallel with the North line of said NE '/4 of the NW 1/4 to its intersection with a line drawn parallel with and distant 250.3 feet East of the West line of the NE 1/4 of the NW % as measured along a line parallel with the North line of said NE '/4 of the NW '/4; thence South parallel with said West line of the NE '/4 of the NW % a distance of 323.195 to the actual point of beginning of the land to be herein described; thence South on said parallel Iine199.10 feet, more or less, to the South line of said NE 1/4 of the NW %; thence West along said South line to the West line of said NE % of the NW %; thence North along said West line to its intersection with a line drawn parallel with the North line of the NE '/4 of the NW %from the actual point of beginning; thence East to the actual point of beginning. Except the Westerly 30 feet and the Southerly 50 feet thereof, according to the United States Government Survey thereof and situated in Hennepin County, Minnesota Parcel C: The West 250.3 feet of the South 100.0 feet of the North 693.86 feet of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter. Except the Westerly 30 feet thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Section 3. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Sec. 11.99 entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 4. This ordinance shall take effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law. Adopted by the City Council this 20th day of January, 2015. /s/Shepard M. Harris Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: /s/Kristine A. Luedke Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk