Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
09-01-15 CC Agenda Packet (entire)
AGENDA Regular Meeting of the City Council Golden Valley City Hall 7800 Golden Valley Road Council Chamber September 1, 2015 6:30 pm The Council may consider item numbers 1, 2, 3, 5 and 6 prior to the public hearings scheduled at 7 pm 1. CALL TO ORDER PAGES A. Roll Call B. Pledge of Allegiance 2. ADDITIONS AND CORRECTIONS TO AGENDA 3. CONSENT AGENDA Approval of Consent Agenda - All items listed under this heading are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no discussion of these items unless a Council Member or citizen so requests in which event the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda. A. Approval of Minutes 1. Council/Manager Meeting - August 11, 2015 3-5 2. City Council Meeting - August 18, 2015 6-10 B. Approval of City Check Register 11 C. Licenses: 1. Gambling License Exemption and Waiver of Notice Requirement - Community 12-14 of Recovering People d/b/a The Retreat 2. Gambling License Exemption and Waiver of Notice Requirement - Providence 15-17 Academy D. Minutes of Boards and Commissions: 1. Planning Commission - July 27, 2015 18-29 2. Board of Zoning Appeals - July 28, 2015 30-36 3. Human Rights Commission - July 28, 2015 37-40 E. Authorize Cooperative Agreement with Bassett Creek Watershed Management 41-48 Commission for Honeywell Pond Expansion Project No. 14-20 F. Set Date for Public Hearing - 2016-2017 Proposed Budget and 2016 Property Tax 49 Levy - 12/1/15 G. Second Consideration - Ordinance #579 - Amendment to the 2015 Master Fee 50-51 Schedule for Increase in Water Rates H. Call for public hearing - Certification of Special Assessments 52 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS 7 PM A. Public Hearing - Adopting Redevelopment Plan for Winnetka & Medicine Lake Road 53-101 Redevelopment Project Area, establishing TIF District, Liberty Crossing, and adopting the Tax Increment Financing Plan 15-71 B. Public Hearing - Adopting Modification to Redevelopment Plan for Highway 55 West 102-136 Redevelopment Project Area, establishing Tax Increment Financing District, Cornerstone Creek, and adopting the Tax Increment Financing Plan 15-72 5. OLD BUSINESS 6. NEW BUSINESS A. Resolution Adopting 2016-2017 Proposed Budget and 2016 Proposed Levy 15-73 137-144 B. Announcements of Meetings C. Mayor and Council Communications 7. ADJOURNMENT Council/Manager Meeting Minutes August 12, 2015 Present: Mayor Harris and Council Members, Clausen, Fonnest, Schmidgall and Snope, City Manager Tom Burt, Finance Director Sue Virnig, Physical Development Director Marc Nevinski; Director of Parks and Recreation Rick Birno, Planning Manager Jason Zimmerman, Associate Planner/Grant Writer Emily Goellner, and Administrative Assistant Judy Nally. The meeting began at 6:32 pm in the Council Conference Room. Xcel Energy Power Outages Representatives from Xcel Energy, Michelle Swanson, Troy Browen, Mary Santori, and Grania McKiernan gave a PowerPoint presentation which included topics regarding, storm response efforts, planning, execution, communication, restoration progression, outage restoration priorities, storm readiness, and outage reporting. The Council discussed priority levels, burying power lines, tree trimming around power lines, infrastructure repair and replacement, and reporting street light outages. After discussion by the Council, staff was requested to place an article in the newsletter and on the website about power outages and reporting methods. The article will also contain information about residents registering their cell phone number to help Xcel better determine the affected outage area, and how residents can register with medical needs as a priority customer. Mayors United Against Anti-Semitism Imitative Ethan Roberts, Minnesota Jewish Community Relations Council, requested Council support for the Mayor to sign the initiative statement. The Council suggested that Minnesota Jewish Community Relations Council request support from the League of Minnesota Cities. Some Council Members felt that the focus should be on anti-discrimination as a broader issue and not on specific groups or organizations. Some expressed concern about setting a precedent in dealing with specific issues. A majority of the Council supported the Mayor signing the Anti-Semitism initiative. The Council consensus was to request the Human Rights Commission advise the Council on responding to requests from individual groups in the future. Brookview Community Center Replacement - Pre-design Check-in Director of Parks and Recreation Rick Birno and Hammel, Green and Abrahamson (HGA) representative Glen Waguespack reviewed the conceptual site plan and indoor kids' play option site plan as recommended by the Open Space and Recreation Commission. The Council discussed the indoor play area, the open space play area, meeting rooms, possible teen area, costs, possible project over-run, infrastructure, running track, splash pad, reciprocal agreements with other recreation facilities at other cities, public/private partnerships, holding a referendum, when designs will be available, when a decision has Council/Manager Meeting Minutes August 11, 2015 — Page 2 to be made regarding the cost of a new community center, and residential and business tax implications. Some Council Members expressed concern over the proposed cost and suggested additions be phased in over time. The Council consensus was to support the addition of an indoor kids' play area but keep costs down. Staff was requested to bring back an updated plan with cost projections, to include a kids' play area, but scale back other areas at a future Council/Manager meeting. Elected Officials Code of Conduct and Ethics Due to the time this item will discussed at a future Council/Manager meeting. Planned Unit Development (PUD) Approval Process Associate Planner/Grant Writer Emily Goellner reviewed plans to simplify and clarify the PUD amendment process, including increasing the number of minor amendments, adding an administrative amendment process and clarifying the public purpose recommendations. The Council consensus was to support amending the PUD process. Staff will prepare the text amendments for consideration by the Planning Commission and City Council. The Council also recommended adding public art as a public purpose. Bikeways and Golden Valley Bike Plan Physical Development Director Marc Nevinski outlined the current bikeway and bike plan which does not include the current Hennepin County plan. He stated that the bikeway/bike plan will be included in the Comprehensive Plan update. The Council had questions regarding a bikeway/bike committee, funding opportunities, hiring a consultant to prepare a bikeway/bike plan, the process for adding City/County bikeways, bike standards, guidelines and policy. Kelley Yeman, Hennepin County representative, reviewed plans for the striping/stenciling of Golden Valley Road and Winnetka Avenue. The Council consensus was to request Hennepin County stencil bike lanes on Golden Valley Road and Winnetka Avenue. The Council requested staff hire a consultant to update the bikeway/bike lane plan and develop a process to establish a Bike Advisory Committee in 2016. Golden Valley Road Parking Concept Plan Planning Manager Jason Zimmerman reviewed the Golden Valley Road station park and ride concept plan. The Council had questions regarding parking, bus traffic and drop-off area, possible Minneapolis Park Board land swap, the Plymouth Avenue station, bike path connections, environmental review and the municipal consent process. Council/Manager Meeting Minutes August 11, 2015 — Page 3 The Council supported the Golden Valley Road Station Park and Ride Concept plan. Mayor Harris, Council Member Snope and staff will meet with the Minneapolis Park Board. Biennial 2016-2017 Proposed General Fund Budget The Council asked questions about the proposed 2016-2017 budget for Mayor & Council Division, City Manager Division, Transfers Out, Administrative Services Division, Legal Division, Insurance Division, Revenues, Fund Balance, and tax impact on properties, and considered a water rate increase. The Council by consensus directed staff to prepare an agreement with Best & Flanagan to extend the legal services for the City and Housing and Redevelopment Authority for a period of one year. The Council by consensus authorized the staff recommendations for the funds received for the Golden Hills decertification. Board/Commission Vacancies The Council discussed the vacancies on the Human Services Fund, Human Rights Commission and Open Space and Recreation Commission. Staff was requested to schedule board/commission interviews for September 8 and September 16 beginning around 5 pm. The meeting adjourned at 10:42 pm. Judy Nally Administrative Assistant City of UNOFFICIAL MINUTES 10" CITY COUNCIL MEETING valley GOLDEN VALLEY, MINNESOTA August 18, 2015 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Pro Tem Snope called the meeting to order at 6:30 pm. 1A. Roll Call Present: Mayor Pro Tem Snope, Council Members Clausen, Fonnest, and Schmidgall. Also present were: City Manager Burt, City Attorney Garry and City Clerk Luedke. Absent: Mayor Harris 1 B. Pledge of Allegiance 1C. Proclamation for Hunger Action Month Ms. Carla Johnson, Human Rights Commission Chair, reviewed the services that PRISM and Second Harvest Heartland offer and read the Proclamation for Hunger Action Month. Council thanked the Human Services Commission for their continued service to the community. 2. ADDITIONS AND CORRECTIONS TO AGENDA MOTION made by Council Member Schmidgall, seconded by Council Member Clausen to approve the agenda of August 18, 2015, as submitted and the motion carried. 3. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA MOTION made by Council Member Schmidgall, seconded by Council Member Clausen to approve the consent agenda of August 18, 2015, as revised: removal of 3J-Resolution authorizing City Manager to execute amendment to the Residential Recycling Grant Agreement and 3L-Resolution approving Plat for Golden Villas PUD and authorize Mayor and City Manager to sign the PUD Permit and Development Agreement and the motion carried. 3A1. Approve Minutes of the Council/Manager Meeting of May 12, 2015. 3A2. Approve Minutes of the Special Council/Manager Meeting of July 13, 2015. 3A3. Approve Minutes of the City Council Meeting of August 5, 2015. 3131. Approve City Check Register and authorize the payments of the bills as submitted. 3132. Approve Housing and Redevelopment Authority Check Register and authorize the payments of the bills as submitted. 3C. Authorize the Issuance of General Licenses as recommended by Staff. 3D. Accept for filing the Minutes of Boards and Commissions as follows: 1. Open Space and Recreation Commission - April 27, 2015 2. Environmental Commission - April 27, 2015 3. Civil Service Commission - July 21, 2015 4. Joint Water Commission - June 3, 2015 3E1. Award a contract for the Demolition of 6300 Winsdale Street to the lowest responsible bidder, Wickenhauser Demolition & Excavating, in the amount of $24,030.00. 3E2. Award a contract for the Demolition of 2300 Douglas Drive to the lowest responsible bidder, Wickenhauser Demolition & Excavating, in the amount of $34,885.00. 3F. Adopt second consideration, Ordinance #573, amending City Code Section 6.43 for Peddlers and Solicitors and approve Summary of Ordinance #573 for publication. Unofficial City Council Minutes -2- August 18, 2015 3. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA - continued 3G. Adopt second consideration, Ordinance #574, amending the 2015 Master Fee Schedule for Peddlers and Solicitors Fees. 3H. Receive and file the July 2015 Financial Reports. 31. Adopt Resolution 15-66, Authorizing Transfer of$1,386,060.42 from the Capital Improvement Fund to the Housing and Redevelopment General Fund ($200,000); General Fund ($39,000); Park Improvement Fund ($147,060.42) and the Equipment Fund ($1,000,000). 1 to the Residential ReGyGling Grant Agreement 3K. Adopt Resolution 15-68, Modifying 2015 General Wages and Salary for Public Works Maintenance Manager. X. Adopt Re6GIUtiGR 15-69, AppFeve Plat for Golden Villas P1JD Ne. 18 and Autherize the Mayor and Gity Manager to sign the PUD Permit and DevelepmeRt AgreemeRt. 3M. Authorize the City Manager to sign the Amendment to Legal Services Agreement with Best & Flanagan, LLP for City Attorney services. 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA 3J. Approve Amendments to the Residential Recycling Grant Agreement Physical Development Director Nevinski presented the staff report and answered questions from Council. MOTION made by Mayor Pro Tem Snope, seconded by Council Member Fonnest to adopt Resolution 15-67, authorizing the City Manager to execute Amendment No.1 to the Residential Recycling Grant Agreement upon a vote being taken the following voted in favor of: Snope, Fonnest, Schmidgall and Clausen and the following voted against: none and the motion carried. 31L. Approval of Plat for Golden Villas PUD No. 118 and Authorize the Mayor and City Manager to sign the PUD Permit and Development Agreement Physical Development Director Nevinski presented the staff report and answered questions from Council. MOTION made by Council Member Fonnest, seconded by Council Member Schmidgall to adopt Resolution 15-69, Approval of Plat for Golden Villas PUD No. 118 upon a vote being taken the following voted in favor of: Schmidgall, Snope and Fonnest and the following voted against: Clausen and the motion carried. MOTION made by Council Member Fonnest, seconded by Council Member Schmidgall to authorize the Mayor and City Manager to sign the PUD Permit and Development Agreement for Golden Villas PUD No. 118 upon a vote being taken the following voted in favor of: Schmidgall, Snope and Fonnest and the following voted against: Clausen and the motion carried. 4A. Public Hearing - Final PUD Plan for Cornerstone Creek PUD No. 124 - 9300 and 9310 Golden Valley Road - CHDC Cornerstone Creek LLC, Applicant Planning Manager Zimmerman presented the staff report and answered questions from Council. Unofficial City Council Minutes -3- August 18, 2015 4A. Public Hearing - Final PUD for Cornerstone Creek PUD No. 124 - continued Mayor Pro Tem Snope opened the public hearing. No one came forward. Mayor Pro Tem closed the public hearing. There was Council discussion regarding the Final PUD Plan for Cornerstone Creek located at 9300 and 9310 Golden Valley Road. MOTION made by Council Member Schmidgall, seconded by Council Member Clausen to adopt Ordinance #575, Approval of Final PUD Plan, Cornerstone Creek PUD No. 124, CHDC Cornerstone Creek LLC, Applicant upon a vote being taken the following voted in favor: Clausen, Fonnest, Snope and Schmidgall; and the following voted against: none, and the motion carried. 4B. Public Hearing - Ordinance #576 and #577 - Rezoning of 9000 and 9050 Golden Valley Road from Commercial to High Density Planning Manager Zimmerman presented the staff report and answered questions from Council. Mr. Zimmerman recommended approval of the Zoning Map Amendment rezoning 9000 and 9050 Golden Valley Road from Commercial to High-Density Residential (R-4) based on the following additional findings: • Aligns the Zoning designation with the Comprehensive Plan. • Allows high density housing in this area of the City to accommodate the future population growth forecasted by the Metropolitan Council. • Supports the goals and objectives set forth in the Redevelopment Plan for the Highway 55 Redevelopment Area, adopted by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority on October 9, 2012. Mayor Pro Tem Snope opened the public hearing. No one came forward. Mayor Pro Tem Snope closed the public hearing. There was Council discussion regarding the rezoning of 9000 and 9050 Golden Valley Road from Commercial to High Density. MOTION made by Council Member Schmidgall, seconded by Council Member Fonnest to adopt Ordinance #576, based on the findings to Rezone 9000 Golden Valley Road from Commercial to High Density (R-4) Residential, City of Golden Valley, Applicant upon a vote being taken the following voted in favor: Clausen, Snope, Fonnest and Schmidgall; and the following voted against: none, and the motion carried. MOTION made by Council Member Schmidgall, seconded by Council Member Fonnest to adopt Ordinance #577, based on the findings to Rezone 9050 Golden Valley Road from Commercial to High Density (R-4) Residential, City of Golden Valley, Applicant upon a vote being taken the following voted in favor: Clausen, Snope, Fonnest and Schmidgall; and the following voted against: none, and the motion carried. 4C. Public Hearing - Approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 139 - 9000 Golden Valley Road - The Schuett Companies, Applicant Planning Manager Zimmerman presented the staff report and answered questions from Council. Mr. Matt Goldstein, Vice President of Development, Schuett Companies, described the Company's business model, discussed parking issues and answered questions from Council. Unofficial City Council Minutes -4- August 18, 2015 4C. Public Hearing - Approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 139 - continued Mayor Pro Tem Snope opened the public hearing. No one came forward. Mayor Pro Tem Snope closed the public hearing. There was Council discussion regarding the Conditional Use Permit for the Schuett Companies located at 9000 Golden Valley Road. MOTION made by Council Member Fonnest, seconded by Council Member Clausen to adopt Ordinance #578, Approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 139, 9000 Golden Valley Road, The Schuett Companies, Applicant upon a vote being taken the following voted in favor: Schmidgall, Clausen, Fonnest and Snope; and the following voted against: none, and the motion carried. 6. NEW BUSINESS 6A. Authorization to Sign Amended PUD Permit - Lupient Infiniti PUD No. 66, Amendment#5 - 7100 Wayzata Boulevard - Jeff Lupient, Applicant Planning Intern Sonnek presented the staff report and answered questions from Council. MOTION made by Council Member Schmidgall, seconded by Council Member Clausen to authorize the Mayor and City Manager to sign the amended PUD Permit for Lupient Infiniti PUD No. 66, Amendment No. 5 and the motion carried. 6B. Authorize Interfund Loan from Capital Improvement Fund to Water and Sewer Fund for 36-Inch Pipe Reconstruction Finance Director Virnig presented the staff report and answered questions from Council. MOTION made by Council Member Fonnest, seconded by Council Member Clausen to adopt Resolution 15-70, Authorizing Interfund Loan from Capital Improvement Fund to Water and Sewer Fund for 36-Inch Pipe Reconstruction upon a vote being taken the following voted in favor: Snope, Clausen, Schmidgall and Fonnest and the following voted against: none and the motion carried. 6C. First Consideration - Amending the 2015 Master Fee Schedule for Increase in Water Rates starting October 1, 2015 Finance Director Virnig presented the staff report and answered questions from Council. MOTION made by Council Member Clausen, seconded by Council Member Schmidgall to adopt first consideration Ordinance #579, Amending the 2015 Master Fee Schedule for Water Rates starting October 1, 2015, upon a vote being taken the following voted in favor: Clausen, Schmidgall, Snope and Fonnest and the following voted against: none and the motion carried. 6D. METRO Blue Line Extension Update Planning Manager Zimmerman presented the staff report and answered questions from Council. MOTION made by Council Member Fonnest, seconded by Council Member Clausen to receive and file the METRO Blue Line Extension Update and the motion carried. Unofficial City Council Minutes -5- August 18, 2015 6E. Announcement of Meetings The Battle of the Badges Community Blood Drive will be held on August 19, 2015, from 1 to 5 pm at the Public Safety Building. A Movie in the Park will be held on August 20, 2015, at 8:15 pm at Scheid Park. Some Council Members may attend the Market in the Valley Farmer's Market on August 23 and 30, 2015, from 9 am to 1 pm in the City Hall Campus Parking Lot. Some Council Members may attend the Porsche Grand Opening Event on August 25, 2015, from 6 to 9 pm located at 9595 Wayzata Boulevard. Some Council Members may attend the Minnesota Moving Forward Together Event on August 25, 2015, for 8:30 am - 5 pm at the University of Minnesota - TCF Bank Stadium. Some Council Members may attend the Community Action Partnership of Suburban Hennepin's 30th Anniversary on August 26, 2015, from 12:30 - 3 pm at Brookview Park. The next City Council meeting is September 1, 2015, at 6:30 pm. Some Council Members may attend the Brookview Pub Bowl - Lawn Bowling Tournament being held September 4 through 6, 2015, at Brookview Golf Course. Some Council Members may attend the Human Right Commission event: National Day of Service and Remembrance on September 10, 2015, from 6 to 8 pm at Second Harvest Heartland West. 6F. Mayor and Council Communication City Manager Burt's last day will be August 31, 2015. City Manager Cruikshank with start with the City on September 9, 2015. Council thanked City Manager Burt for his years of service with the City of Golden Valley and presented him with a gift. 7. ADJOURMENT MOTION made by Council Member Schmidgall, seconded by Council Member Clausen and the motion carried to adjourn the meeting at 8:18 pm. Andy Snope, Mayor Pro Tem ATTEST: Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk city 0 golden *ey M M Administrative Services Department 763-593-8013/763-593-3969(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting September 1, 2015 Agenda Item 3. B. Approval of City Check Register Prepared By Sue Virnig, Finance Director Summary Approval of the check register for various vendor claims against the City of Golden Valley. Attachments • Document sent via email Recommended Action Motion to authorize the payment of the bills as submitted. city U f goldcn MEMORANDUM valley City Administration Council 763-593-3991 /763-593-8109(fax) tirip' d!l IJi'3fl Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting September 1, 2015 Agenda Item 3. C. 1. Gambling License Exemption and Waiver of Notice Requirement - Community of Recovering People d/b/a The Retreat Prepared By Judy Nally, Administrative Assistant Summary As per State Statute organizations that conduct gambling within the City limits have to submit an application for a lawful gambling permit to the State after the permit has been approved or denied by the City. Depending upon the timing of the permit the applicants may request the City to waive the 30-day waiting period. Attachments • Application for Exempt Permit (2 pages) Recommended Action Motion to receive and file the gambling license exemption and approve the waiver of notice requirement for Community of Recovering People d/b/a The Retreat. MINNESOTA LAWFUL GAMBLING 5/15 LG220 Application for Exempt Permit Page 1 of 2 An exempt permit may be issued to a nonprofit Application Fee (non-refundable) organization that: Applications are processed in the order received. If the application • conducts lawful gambling on five or fewer days, and is postmarked or received 30 days or more before the event,the awards less than$50,000 in prizes during a calendar application fee is$100; otherwise the fee is$150. year. If total raffle prize value for the calendar year will be Due to the high volume of exempt applications, payment of $1,500 or less, contact the Licensing Specialist assigned to additional fees prior to 30 days before your event will not expedite your county by calling 651-539-1900. service, nor are telephone requests for expedited service accepted. ORGANIZATION INFORMATION Organization Previous Gambling Name: Community of Recovering People dba The Retreat Permit Number: X34583 Minnesota Tax ID Federal Employer ID Number, if any: Number(FEIN), if any: 41-1701950 Mailing Address: 1221 Wayzata Boulevard East city: Wayzata State: MN Zip: 55391 County: Hennepin Name of Chief Executive Officer(CEO): John H. Curtiss Daytime Phone: 952-476-0566 Email: djohnson@theretreat.org NONPROFIT STATUS Type of Nonprofit Organization check one): Fraternal Ej Religious a Veterans M Other Nonprofit Organization Attach a copy of one of the following showing proof of nonprofit status: (DO NOT attach a sales tax exempt status or federal employer ID number, as they are not proof of nonprofit status.) A current calendar year Certificate of Good Standing Don't have a copy? Obtain this certificate from: MN Secretary of State, Business Services Division Secretary of State website, phone numbers: 60 Empire Drive,Suite 100 www.sos.state.mn.us St. Paul, MN 55103 651-296-2803,or toll free 1-877-551-6767 aIRS income tax exemption(501(c)) letter in your organization's name Don't have a copy? To obtain a copy of your federal income tax exempt letter, have an organization officer contact the IRS toll free at 1-877-829-5500. IRS-Affiliate of national,statewide,or international parent nonprofit organization(charter) If your organization falls under a parent organization, attach copies of both of the following: 1. IRS letter showing your parent organization is a nonprofit 501(c)organization with a group ruling,and 2. the charter or letter from your parent organization recognizing your organization as a subordinate. GAMBLING PREMISES INFORMATION Name of premises where the gambling event will be conducted (for raffles, list the site where the drawing will take place): Metropolitan Ballroom Address(do not use P.O. box): 5418 Wayzata Boulevard City or Township: Golden Valley Zip: 55419 County: Hennepin Date(s)of activity(for raffles, indicate the date of the drawing): Saturday, October 10, 2015 Check each type of gambling activity that your organization will conduct: Bingo* =Paddlewheels* Pull-Tabs* =Tipboards* F,KlRaffle(total value of raffle prizes awarded for the calendar year:$0 to date-for this event $5k) * Gambling equipment for bingo paper, paddlewheels, pull-tabs,and tipboards must be obtained from a distributor licensed by the Minnesota Gambling Control Board. EXCEPTION: Bingo hard cards and bingo number selection devices may be borrowed from another organization authorized to conduct bingo. To find a licensed distributor,go to www.mn.gov/gcb and click on Distributors under LIST OF LICENSEES,or call 651-539-1900. /15 LG220 Application for Exempt Permit Page 25of2 LOCAL UNIT OF GOVERNMENT ACKNOWLEDGMENT (required before submitting application to the Minnesota Gambling Control Board) CITY APPROVAL COUNTY APPROVAL for a gambling premises for a gambling premises located within city limits located in a township The application is acknowledged with no waiting period. The application is acknowledged with no waiting period. The application is acknowledged with a 30-day waiting The application is acknowledged with a 30-day waiting period, and allows the Board to issue a permit after 30 days period,and allows the Board to issue a permit after (60 days for a 1st class city). 30 days. The applicationis denied. /{ The application is denied. aaden Print City Name: vall i Print County Name: Signat f City erson I: Signature of County Personnel: r Title: Date: Title: Date: TOWNSHIP(if required by the county) On behalf of the township, I acknowledge that the organization is applying for exempted gambling activity within the township The city or county must sign before limits. (A township has no statutory authority to approve or submitting application to the deny an application, per Minn. Statutes,section 349.213.) Gambling Control Board. Print Township Name: Signature of Township Officer: Title: Date: CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S SIGNATURE (required) The information provided in this application is complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge. I acknowledge that the financial report will be completed and returned to the Bo rd within30 days of the event date. Chief Executive Officer's Signature: 4� Date: Ls Zy 15 1 (Signa ur must be CEO's signature; designee may not sign) Print Name: �� tt. CU 1 + SS REQUIREMENTS MAIL APPLICATION AND ATTACHMENTS Complete a separate application for: Mail application with: • all gambling conducted on two or more consecutive days,or a copy of your proof of nonprofit status, and • all gambling conducted on one day. application fee(non-refundable). If the application is Only one application is required if one or more raffle drawings are postmarked or received 30 days or more before the event, conducted on the same day, the application fee is$100; otherwise the fee is$150. Financial report to be completed within 30 days after the Make check payable to State of Minnesota. gambling activity is done: To: Gambling Control Board A financial report form will be mailed with your permit. Complete 1711 West County Road B,Suite 300 South and return the financial report form to the Gambling Control Roseville, MN 55113 Board. Questions? Your organization must keep all exempt records and reports for Call the Licensing Section of the Gambling Control Board at 3-1/2 years(Minn. Statutes,section 349.166,subd. 2(f)). 651-539-1900. Data privacy notice: The information requested application. Your organization's name and ment of Public Safety.;Attorney General; on this form(and any attachments)will be used address will be public information when received Commissioners of Administration, Minnesota by the Gambling Control Board(Board)to by the Board. All other information provided will Management&Budget,and Revenue; Legislative determine your organization's qualifications to be private data about your organization until the Auditor,national and international gambling be involved in lawful gambling activities in Board issues the permit. When the Board issues regulatory agencies;anyone pursuant to court Minnesota. Your organization has the right to the permit,all information provided will become order;other individuals and agencies specifically refuse to supply the information; however, if public. If the Board does not issue a permit,all authorized by state or federal law to have access your organization refuses to supply this information provided remains private,with the to the information; individuals and agencies for information,the Board may not be able to exception of your organization's name and which law or legal order authorizes a new use or determine your organization's qualifications and, address which will remain public. Private data sharing of information after this notice was as a consequence,may refuse to issue a permit. about your organization are available to Board given;and anyone with your written consent. If your organization supplies the information members,Board staff whose work requires requested,the Board will be able to process the access to the information;Minnesota's Depart- This form will be made available in alternative format(i.e. large print,braille)upon request. city of goldenwvo',�� MEMORANDUM valley City Administration/Council 763-593-3991 /763-593-8109(fax) INNEWROMIN Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting September 1, 2015 Agenda Item 3. C. 2. Gambling License Exemption and Waiver of Notice Requirement- Providence Academy Prepared By Judy Nally, Administrative Assistant Summary As per State Statute organizations that conduct gambling within the City limits have to submit an application for a lawful gambling permit to the State after the permit has been approved or denied by the City. Depending upon the timing of the permit the applicants may request the City to waive the 30-day waiting period. Attachments • Application for Exempt Permit (2 pages) Recommended Action Motion to receive and file the gambling license exemption and approve the waiver of notice requirement for Providence Academy. MINNESOTA LAWFUL GAMBLING 5/15 LG220 Application for Exempt Permit Page 1 of 2 An exempt permit may be issued to a nonprofit Application Fee (non-refundable) organization that: Applications are processed in the order received. If the application conducts lawful gambling on five or fewer days,and is postmarked or received 30 days or more before the event, the awards less than $50,000 in prizes during a calendar year. application fee is $100; otherwise the fee is $150. If total raffle prize value for the calendar year will be Due to the high volume of exempt applications, payment of $1,500 or less, contact the Licensing Specialist assigned to additional fees prior to 30 days before your event will not expedite your county by calling 651-539-1900. service, nor are telephone requests for expedited service accepted. ORGANIZATION INFORMATION Organization Previous Gambling Name: Providence Academy Permit Number: X-34857-15-010 Minnesota Tax ID Federal Employer ID Number, if any: Number(FEIN), if any: 41-1883866 Mailing Address: 15100 Schmidt Lake Road City; Plymouth State: MN Zip: 55446 County: Hennepin Name of Chief Executive Officer (CEO): Todd Flanders Daytime Phone: (763) 258-2516 Email: dawn.schommer@providenceacademy.org NONPROFIT STATUS ffe of Nonprofit Organization check one): Fraternal Religious Q Veterans 2✓ Other Nonprofit Organization Attach a copy of one of the following showing proof of nonprofit status: (DO NOT attach a sales tax exempt status or federal employer ID number, as they are not proof of nonprofit status.) A current calendar year Certificate of Good Standing Don't have a copy? Obtain this certificate from: MN Secretary of State, Business Services Division Secretary of State website, phone numbers: 60 Empire Drive, Suite 100 www.sos.state.mn.us St. Paul, MN 55103 651-296-2803, or toll free 1-877-551-6767 F✓ IRS income tax exemption (501(c)) letter in your organization's name Don't have a copy? To obtain a copy of your federal income tax exempt letter, have an organization officer contact the IRS toll free at 1-877-829-5500. IRS -Affiliate of national, statewide, or international parent nonprofit organization (charter) If your organization falls under a parent organization, attach copies of both of the following: 1. IRS letter showing your parent organization is a nonprofit 501(c) organization with a group ruling, and 2. the charter or letter from your parent organization recognizing your organization as a subordinate. GAMBLING PREMISES INFORMATION Name of premises where the gambling event will be conducted (for raffles, list the site where the drawing will take place): Golden Valley Golf and Country Club Address (do not use P.O. box): 7001 Golden Valley Road City or Township: Golden Valley Zip: 55427 County: Hennepin Date(s) of activity (for raffles, indicate the date of the drawing): January 30, 2016 Check each type of gambling activity that your organization will conduct: Bingo* =Paddlewheels* Pull-Tabs* =Tipboards* Raffle (total value of raffle prizes awarded for the calendar year: $approximately $20,600 ) * Gambling equipment for bingo paper, paddlewheels, pull-tabs, and tipboards must be obtained from a distributor licensed by the Minnesota Gambling Control Board. EXCEPTION: Bingo hard cards and bingo number selection devices may be borrowed from another organization authorized to conduct bingo. To find a licensed distributor, go to www.mn.gov/gcb and click on LG220 Application for Exempt Permit 5/15 Page 2 of 2 LOCAL UNIT OF GOVERNMENT ACKNOWLEDGMENT (required before submitting application to the Minnesota Gambling Control Board) CITY APPROVAL COUNTY APPROVAL for a gambling premises for a gambling premises �� located within city limits located in a township V The application is acknowledged with no waiting period. The application is acknowledged with no waiting period. The application is acknowledged with a 30-day waiting The application is acknowledged with a 30-day waiting period, and allows the Board to issue a permit after 30 days period, and allows the Board to issue a permit after (60 days for a 1st class city). 30 days. The application is denied. The application is denied. Print City Name: © VQPrint County Name: Signatur of i y P sonnet: Signature of County Personnel: A _�A� Title: Date: 'J Title: Date: TOWNSHIP (if required by the county) On behalf of the township, I acknowledge that the organization is applying for exempted gambling activity within the township The city or county must sign before limits. (A township has no statutory authority to approve or submitting application to the deny an application, per Minn. Statutes, section 349.213.) Gambling Control Board. Print Township Name: Signature of Township Officer: Title: Date: CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S SIGNATURE (required) The information provided in this application is complete and acc to th y knowledge. I acknowledge that the financial report will be completed and returned to the Board withi ate. /s Chief Executive Officer's Signature: Date: (Signatur u be CE signature; designee may not sign) Print Name: � r/G <Z. REQUIREMENTS MAIL APPLICATION AND ATTACHMENTS Complete a separate application for: Mail application with: • all gambling conducted on two or more consecutive days, or a copy of your proof of nonprofit status, and • all gambling conducted on one day. application fee (non-refundable). If the application is Only one application is required if one or more raffle drawings are postmarked or received 30 days or more before the event, conducted on the same day. the application fee is $100; otherwise the fee is $ISO. Financial report to be completed within 30 days after the Make check payable to State of Minnesota. gambling activity is done: To: Gambling Control Board A financial report form will be mailed with your permit. Complete 1711 West County Road B, Suite 300 South and return the financial report form to the Gambling Control Board. Roseville, MN 55113 Questions? Your organization must keep all exempt records and reports for Call the Licensing Section of the Gambling Control Board at 3-1/2 years (Minn. Statutes, section 349.166, subd. 2(f)). 651-539-1900. Data privacy notice: The information requested application. Your organization's name and ment of Public Safety;Attorney General; on this form(and any attachments)will be used address will be public information when received Commissioners of Administration, Minnesota by the Gambling Control Board(Board)to by the Board. All other Information provided will Management&Budget,and Revenue; Legislative determine your organization's qualifications to be private data about your organization until the Auditor,national and international gambling be involved in lawful gambling activities in Board issues the permit. When the Board issues regulatory agencies; anyone pursuant to court Minnesota. Your organization has the right to the permit,all information provided will become order; other individuals and agencies specifically refuse to supply the information; however, if public. If the Board does not issue a permit,all authorized by state or federal law to have access your organization refuses to supply this information provided remains private,with the to the information; individuals and agencies for information,the Board may not be able to exception of your organization's name and which law or legal order authorizes a new use or determine your organization's qualifications and, address which will remain public. Private data sharing of information after this notice was as a consequence,may refuse to issue a permit. about your organization are available to Board given; and anyone with your written consent. If your organization supplies the information members, Board staff whose work requires requested,the Board will be able to process the access to the information; Minnesota's Depart- Regular Meeting of the Golden Valley Planning Commission July 27, 2015 A regular meeting of the Planning Commission was held at the Golden Valley City Hall, Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota, on Monday, July 27, 2015. Vice Chair Segelbaum called the meeting to order at 7 pm. Those present were Planning Commissioners Baker, Blum, Johnson, Kluchka, Segelbaum, and Waldhauser. Also present was Associate Planner/Grant Writer Emily Goellner, and Administrative Assistant Lisa Wittman. Commissioner Cera was absent. 1. Approval of Minutes June 22, 2015, Regular Planning Commission Meeting Waldhauser referred to the sixth paragraph on page 3 and stated that the first sentence should read "...turning left on to Medicine Lake Road" instead of "...turning left from Medicine Lake Road." Baker referred to the seventh paragraph on page 9 and stated that the word "site" should be changed to "sight." MOVED by Kluchka, seconded by Waldhauser and motion carried unanimously to approve the June 22, 2015, minutes with the above noted changes. 2. Informal Public Hearing — Final Plan Review— Planned Unit Development (PUD #124) — Cornerstone Creek— 9300 and 9310 Golden Valley Road Applicant: CHDC Cornerstone Creek LLC Addresses: 9300 and 9310 Golden Valley Road Purpose: To allow for the consolidation and redevelopment of two parcels for a 45 unit facility for adults with developmental disabilities, administrative offices for Jewish Housing and Programming, and a public multi-purpose space. Goellner referred to a site plan and explained the applicant's request to create a residential development at 9300 and 9310 Golden Valley Road consisting of a 45 unit apartment building for adults with developmental disability, offices for Jewish Housing and Programming (JHAP), and a multi-purpose community space. She explained that due to restrictions related to financing, the multi-purpose community space will be located on a separate parcel within the PUD and that cross access and shared parking agreements will be created to ensure both parcels have access to parking and to Golden Valley Road. Goellner explained that the apartment building will consist of 40 one-bedroom units and 5 two-bedroom units, 14 of which will be reserved for households at 30% of AMI, and 4 of which will be reserved for individuals facing long-term homelessness. She added that Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission July 27, 2015 Page 2 there will also be a commercial kitchen and dining area, common space, a fitness center, and outdoor space. She discussed the parking requirements and stated that 68 parking spaces are required and that the applicant is proposing to have 73 parking spaces (44 underground parking spaces and 29 surface parking spaces) along with 4 spaces for bicycle parking near the front door. Goellner referred to the site plan and explained the changes between the Preliminary PUD Plan and the Final PUD Plan including: shifting of the building to the east, a reduced building footprint, the removal of three parking spaces,creating two lots instead of one, and doing the construction in two phases. She pointed out the location of the future sidewalk along Golden Valley Road that will be built by the City and noted that the mature trees to the rear of the property will remain and significant landscaping will be installed as part of the project. Kluchka asked if there were any City Council comments given during the Preliminary Plan review. Goellner said there were no significant changes requested, but that the applicant has incorporated the City Council's comments into their final plans. Waldhauser asked if the applicant's sewer and storm water systems would be considered private service facilities or common areas, and how that would work between two different owners. Goellner said the City will require shared access and maintenance agreements. Johnson asked what happens with the property if the applicant only builds phase one of their proposal. Goellner stated that the property would have already built adequate parking at that point which would be the main concern if they didn't end up building the community room space in phase two. Baker noted that the applicant is combining two parcels into one, but would then be splitting it again because of the situation with having two separate owners. He asked if it is common in PUDs to have more than one property owner. Goellner said that is more common than not in a PUD. Scott Beckman, UrbanWorks Architecture, explained the changes since the Preliminary Plan review. He stated that they've reduced the building's footprint and moved the building.to the east in order to allow more space between their driveway and the neighbor's driveway to the west. They've realigned their entry drives to align them with the properties across the street, and they've made a pedestrian connection from the proposed building to the City's future sidewalk on Golden Valley Road. Segelbaum asked if part of reducing the size of the building included changing the overall configuration of the building. David Miller, UrbanWorks Architecture, said they just reduced the size of the link in the residential entry. Waldhauser asked for an overview of the changes made to comply with the Fire Chief's comments. Beckman said they are adding a couple of primary shut-off connections and access at the front of the building, providing water access, adding sprinklers to smaller spaces, adding stand pipes in the stairways, and adding smoke monitoring. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission July 27, 2015 Page 3 Kluchka asked if the greater community would be able to use the community room space. Anne Hope, Executive Director, Jewish Housing and Programming, stated that on a daily basis it will have a locked entrance, but they hope to make the space available for the community to rent. She said the space will be used as a sanctuary and a multi-purpose space as well. Kluchka asked about snow removal plans. Beckman stated that there are a couple of parking spaces that could be used for snow storage and that the owner will contract to have snow removed. Hope added she will speak to their property management company about snow removal. Kluchka referred to the number of parking spaces and asked if the residents will have cars. Hope stated that the majority of the residents will not be drivers and that people using the community center could park in the underground parking level as well. Segelbaum asked about the ownership of the different parcels. Heidi Rathmann, Community Housing Development Corporation (CHDC), explained that due to the nature of the financing there will be two separate owners. The housing side will be owned by a limited partnership and the non-housing side will be owned by a newly created LLC. In both cases the managing members will be CHDC. Segelbaum asked if the owners are for profit, or non-profit. Rathmann stated CHDC in a non-profit organization that will partner with a tax credit investor. Waldhauser asked if the office space will be part of phase one and owned by the same entity. Rathmann said yes. Baker asked why a separate entity would want to own just the sanctuary. Rathmann said the majority of the housing is publically funded so it is important that they fund only the housing portion. Blum asked what the terms 30% of AMI and long-term homelessness mean. Rathmann stated that AMI is the average median income and that units would be reserved for individuals making 30% of the average median income. Hope stated that four of the units would be reserved for adults with developmental disabilities that face long-term homelessness. Waldhauser asked if services would be provided by other agencies. Hope explained that tenants will own their leases and they will come in with their own service providers. Segelbaum asked about the need for this type of housing and if CHDC is confident they can fill these units. Hope stated that they have an interest list. She added that it is an innovative building that is different than a group home and they are confident there is a need for this type of housing. Waldhauser asked if most of the new positions would be living wage jobs. Hope stated that the service providers pay their employees directly. She added that they are not high paying jobs, but they pay more than minimum wage jobs. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission July 27, 2015 Page 4 Blum asked how many personnel there would be on site. Hope stated that there isn't a ratio required of providers to tenants, it is based on what the tenants need. She added that there will be 2 or 3 JHAP staff, some property management and maintenance staff, and probably 8 to 9 care providers on-site at various times. Blum asked for an explanation of the footcandle map submitted as part of the application. Miller explained that the footcandle map shows the distribution and level of lighting and illustrates how the lighting is meeting the Zoning Code requirements. Beckman added that it also shows that light from this property won't bleed onto adjacent properties. Waldhauser asked if any consideration was given to adding a green roof or solar panels to the building. Miller said those are easy to add post-occupancy, but they are not in the initial construction budget. Segelbaum opened the public hearing. Seeing and hearing no one wishing to comment, Segelbaum closed the public hearing. Kluchka asked if a condition should be added around snow removal in order to be consistent with the condition placed on the property across the street. He added that he doesn't want to see giant piles of snow in this highly visible area. Waldhauser noted that the property across the street had no room for snow storage. Blum stated that this property seems to have more open space to store snow and suggested that the applicant provide a plan showing they have sufficient space. Beckman referred to a site plan and showed where snow could be stored. He noted that the PUD criteria requires a plan for snow storage or removal. Blum said the proposed LED lighting is exceptionally environmentally sound and the application packet was well prepared and detailed. Waldhauser said this sounds like a great facility that is needed in the community. Segelbaum agreed. MOVED by Kluchka, seconded by Baker and motion carried unanimously to recommend approval of the Final PUD Plan for Cornerstone Creek PUD No. 124, subject to the following findings and conditions: Findings: 1. The PUD plan is tailored to the specific characteristics of the site and achieves a higher quality of site planning and design than generally expected under conventional provisions of the ordinance. By utilizing the PUD process, the applicant has been able to accommodate three distinct but complementary uses on the site. 2. The PUD plan preserves and protects substantial desirable portions of the site's characteristics, open space and sensitive environmental features including steep slopes, trees, scenic views, creeks, wetlands, and open waters. The proposed project protects 65 feet of undeveloped wooded area at the rear of the lot. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission July 27, 2015 Page 5 3. The PUD plan includes efficient and effective use (which includes preservation) of the land. As a redevelopment of underutilized properties, the proposal would make better use of existing infrastructure and help the area transition into a more mixed use and pedestrian friendly environment. 4. The PUD Plan results in development compatible with adjacent uses and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and redevelopment plans and goals. The redevelopment of these two underutilized properties for affordable, life-cycle, multifamily housing is consistent with the goals of the Comprehensive Plan. 5. The 'PUD plan is consistent with preserving and improving the general health, safety and general welfare of the people of the City. By providing a new and innovative housing model, this proposal helps address a community, regional, and statewide need. 6. The PUD plan meets the PUD Intent and Purpose provision and all other PUD ordinance provisions. The flexibility provided by the PUD allows for a mix of uses within the site and creates the opportunity for the establishment of a new multi- purpose community space. Conditions: 1. The plans prepared by UrbanWorks Architecture, submitted July 15, 2015, shall become a part of this approval. 2. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Engineering Division, dated July 17, 2015, shall become a part of this approval. 3. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Fire Department, dated July 20, 2015, shall become a part of this approval. 4. The property owner shall provide to the City all easements and agreements necessary to ensure cross-access and shared parking between the two lots. 5. All signage must meet the requirements of the City's Sign Code (Section 4.20). 6. The City Attorney will determine if a title review is necessary prior to approval of the Final Plat. 7. The Final Plat shall include "P.U.D. No. 124" in its title. 8. A park dedication fee of$9,740, or 2% of the land value, shall be paid before release of the Final Plat. 9. The applicant must validate that there is adequate space for snow storage on site, or have a plan in place for snow removal. 10. This approval is subject to all other state, federal, and local ordinances, regulations, or laws with authority over this development. 3. Informal Public Hearing — Property Rezoning — 9000 Golden Valley Road Applicant: City of Golden Valley Address: 9000 Golden Valley Road Purpose: To rezone the property from Commercial to High Density Residential (R4). Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission July 27, 2015 Page 6 4. Informal Public Hearing — Property Rezoning — 9050 Golden Valley Road Applicant: City of Golden Valley Address: 9050 Golden Valley Road Purpose: To rezone the property from Commercial to High Density Residential (R-4). Items 3 and 4 were discussed together. Goellner explained that the properties located at 9000 and 9050 Golden Valley Road have been re-guided on the General Land Use Plan Map from Commercial Retail/Service to Residential High Density. According to state statute the Zoning Map and the General Land Use Plan Map have to be consistent with each other so these properties need to be rezoned from Commercial to High Density (R-4) Residential. Segelbaum asked if development doesn't happen on these properties if the City is stuck with the way the properties are zoned and guided. Goellner said the development is irrelevant because the City Council wants to see this area as High Density Residential. Segelbaum asked if these properties are part of the TIF District in this area. Goellner said they are in a redevelopment area, but there are no projects requesting TIF assistance at this time. Segelbaum opened the public hearing. Seeing and hearing no one wishing to comment, Segelbaum closed the public hearing. Blum said he is very supportive of rezoning these properties because the City often talks about where to put high density housing. He said this proposal is consistent with the long term flow of development along Highway 55 and is doesn't conflict with traditional neighborhoods. MOVED by Kluchka, seconded by Waldhauser and motion carried unanimously to recommend approval of rezoning the property at 9000 Golden Valley Road from Commercial to High Density Residential (R-4). MOVED by Kluchka, seconded by Waldhauser and motion carried unanimously to recommend approval of rezoning the property at 9050 Golden Valley Road from Commercial to High Density Residential (R-4). 5. Informal Public Hearing — Conditional Use Permit (CUP #139) — Schuett Companies — 9000 Golden Valley Road Applicant: Schuett Companies Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission July 27, 2015 Page 7 Addresses: 9000 Golden Valley Road Purpose: To allow for a professional office within a principal structure containing 20 or more dwelling units. Goellner stated that the applicant is proposing to move their current offices from Mendelssohn Avenue in Golden Valley to this location at 9000 Golden Valley Road which is currently a vacant Wendy's restaurant. She added that the City Council has targeted this area for fewer auto oriented uses and for more pedestrian friendly uses. Goellner referred to a site plan and explained the proposed senior living building with 4,900 square feet of attached office space which is the use that requires the proposed Conditional Use Permit. She stated that the requirements for allowing office in the High Density Residential Zoning District state that the office must be on the first floor and must have direct access from the office to the street. She stated that staff is recommending a condition of approval requiring the construction of a sidewalk along the east side of the access drive in order to connect the two building entrances with the proposed sidewalk along Golden Valley Road. She noted that all other zoning requirements have been met. Kluchka asked about the ability to add conditions to the approval of the Conditional Use Permit. Goellner stated that the Zoning Code allows the proposed senior living building so any conditions should be related to the factors used when considering Conditional Use Permits and how they apply to the office use and its relationship to the housing component. Waldhauser asked if there are landscaping, lot coverage, and impervious surface requirements in this zoning district. Goellner said there are impervious surface and building coverage requirements, but the Zoning Code does not have minimum landscape requirements. Segelbaum asked if there are tree preservation requirements. Goellner said yes, and stated that staff will be bringing new landscape requirements for the Planning Commission to review within the next few months. Segelbaum stated that landscaping could be considered part of the visual impact analysis required in reviewing a Conditional Use Permit proposal. Segelbaum asked if there are any other locations in the City with a similar use. Goellner said no, there are no other R-4 uses that include an office use. Waldhauser asked if the proposed office were vacated if the space would have to remain office space or if it could be re-purposed for a different use. Goellner said the Conditional Use Permit would need to be amended to allow a different use. Baker asked if the office space were vacated if it could become housing space. Goellner said yes, and if that were the case the Conditional Use Permit wouldn't be needed because high density housing is a permitted use. Baker said there is going to be a lot going on along this section of Golden Valley Road and he is concerned about the impact to other businesses on that road. He asked if Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission July 27, 2015 Page 8 there is any way to influence the sequencing of the upcoming projects. Goellner said she thinks that may be considered during the right-of-way permitting process. Blum referred to the various proposed uses and said he is concerned that only the minimum parking requirement is being met. Goellner said staff also has concerns about the number of parking spaces being proposed. She stated that staff can look into it further and ask the applicant to provide examples of other properties they have that are similar to this one. Kluchka asked if proof of parking has been considered. Goellner said there is no room for proof of parking. She stated that the office and apartment uses will have different hours and that the City could ask that signs for guest parking spaces be installed. Waldhauser said she thinks office and residential uses are compatible because the residential use will most likely have visitors on the weekend when the office space isn't being used. Johnson said the proposed building seems really massive for this property and asked about the setback requirements. Goellner agreed that it is a dense development and explained that the front yard setback requirement is 25 feet and the side and rear yard setback requirement is 20 feet. She reiterated that the proposal meets all of the requirements of the R-4 Zoning District. Blum noted that these proposals along Highway 55 might seem visually like a row of parking lots and questioned if that should be discouraged. Goellner said staff will be drafting a pedestrian overlay district soon which would reduce the front yard setback area. Kluchka asked when the City will be installing the sidewalk along Golden Valley Road. Goellner said the design work will begin in 2016 and construction would be in 2016 or 2017. Waldhauser asked if landscaping would be put in along with the sidewalk. Goellner said yes. Matt Goldstein, Vice President of Development, Schuett Companies, stated that they are a family-owned business headquartered in Golden Valley. He said the purpose of their Conditional Use Permit request is to create a corporate office and that they've tried very hard to create a straightforward zoning request without the need for a PUD. Waldhauser asked if Schuett has other properties similar to the one being proposed. Goldstein said they have a portfolio of 16 properties located throughout Minnesota. He said they cater to affordable housing for seniors. He said this proposal is a slight departure from their regular model where they are moving away from income restricted affordable housing to mid-range market rate housing. Blum asked Goldstein to describe the need for this type of housing. Goldstein said they've found there is a large group of people that don't qualify for income restricted housing but don't have the means to afford higher end, luxury apartments. He said they see an opportunity to deliver a very strong, unmet need in Golden Valley. Segelbaum asked about the size and types of units. Goldstein said there will be different configurations of 1- bedroom, 2-bedroom, and studio apartments available. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission July 27, 2015 Page 9 Segelbaum asked how many people the office space will accommodate. Tom Schuett, President, Schuett Companies, said the space is oversized for them right now, but it fits with their needs and future growth. He said there are six employees currently and they will have 20 parking spaces for the office use so that will help with the parking concern. He added that they may add a small locker room and work out area in the future. Segelbaum asked if they would lease out the office space they won't be using. Schuett said no, they don't intend to have any other tenants and that the office space will be just for their company. Blum asked how many employees will be required on-site to manage the senior housing building. Schuett explained that there will be a site manager, a maintenance person, a registered nurse and approximately five staff members. He explained that his proposal is essentially assisted living where people won't have to move again, unlike other facilities where people move in when they are independent and then move again when their needs change. He said a lot of their residents won't have cars and that the peak hours for care givers will be from 7 to 9 am, 11 to 1 pm, and 6 to 9 pm. Baker asked if this is a new model. Schuett said it is the model they've been using in their existing buildings. Baker said there is a turnover with these types of uses and he is surprised there is a market for this type of model because it is playing to a short term desire for people who discover it won't fit their needs. Baker stated that each unit will probably have a person caring for a tenant so the simple math says there will be a shortage of parking. Schuett said he would take another look at their staffing levels and their parking needs. He reiterated that their typical resident won't be driving. Segelbaum asked about the outdoor space. Schuett stated there will be garden areas in the back and maybe a porch area. Kluchka asked about their snow removal plans. Goldstein referred to a site plan and showed where snow would be stored. Kluchkaasked the applicant if guest parking signs have been considered. Schuett said they haven't considered that, but they will. Kluchka referred to the proposed parapet at the top of the building and said he is concerned about them not looking real. He suggested that the applicant look for opportunities to make them look more solid, or like they have a purpose. Schuett said he would address the design concerns. He said they also want to have a nice looking building. Segelbaum opened the public hearing. Seeing and hearing no one wishing to comment, Segelbaum closed the public hearing. Segelbaum said the concerns he's heard are regarding snow removal, parking, and design. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission July 27, 2015 Page 10 Waldhauser said she is less concerned about parking since they've learned that almost all of the residents will not be driving. Baker said he is concerned that people will own cars even if they don't drive them and that people will also be coming in everyday to help the residents which will mean more cars. He said he thinks there will need to be a parking space for every unit. Waldhauser said she wouldn't expect that care givers would be helping people one-on-one for hours and hours, they may be helping several different residents while they are there. Kluchka asked if the applicant is asking for a variance from the parking requirements. Goellner said no, they are meeting the parking requirements. She added that the applicant has said they are confident about the proposed number of parking spaces, but she would like the applicant to demonstrate that they will have enough parking. Blum said he thinks this use is a need that should be fulfilled, but the people who go there will have to park somewhere, and it could become a safety issue. Johnson also questioned if there is enough parking for a 100-unit building. Segelbaum stated that there is also a level of underground parking. He noted that their parking ratio is .62 spaces per unit so they are within the range of the City's parking requirement. He added that this is a need for the community, but he thinks the City needs assurance or demonstration that the parking will work. Kluchka said he doesn't want to require more parking. Baker said he would like the applicant to review the parking. He suggested the applicant provide an analysis of their other facilities. Blum said he would like an actual number of the people who will be providing services in order to understand the parking issues. Segelbaum asked the Commissioners how they felt about requiring a snow removal plan. Kluchka said it is valuable to request a plan that is consistent with other apartments in the area. Segelbaum asked the Commissioners about design concerns. Baker said he thinks it's great and he wants the applicant to stay in Golden Valley. Kluchka asked how they can make sure this property is well landscaped. MOVED by Kluchka, seconded by Waldhauser and motion carried unanimously to recommend approval of a Conditional Use Permit at 9000 Golden Valley to allow for a professional office within a principal structure containing 20 or more dwelling units subject to the following findings and conditions: Findings: 1. The applicant has indicated that the market in Golden Valley would be supportive of the type of senior housing being proposed for this location. In addition, the opportunity to collocate the professional offices within the building would generate efficiencies for the management of this project. 2. With the recent redesignation of the property to High Density Residential, the proposed residential use with a secondary office use is consistent with the General Land Use Plan Map. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission July 27, 2015 Page 11 3. Staff anticipates the new use would improve property values as it would replace a vacant fast food restaurant. 4. The number of trips associated with the proposed use is a reduction compared to the previous use, so staff does not expect any negative traffic impacts to the surrounding areas. 5. Between the residential and office uses, the proposal will increase the population at the location as compared to the previous use. This is not expected to have a negative impact 6. The proposed use is not anticipated to cause an increase in noise levels. 7. The proposed use is not anticipated to cause an increase in dust, odor, or vibrations. 8. The proposed use is not anticipated to attract pests. 9. The construction of a new five-story building would be a visual improvement over the existing vacant fast food restaurant. However, the increase in size of the structure will be a change in the scale of development on the property. It will not, however, be out of line with other development taking place along Golden Valley Road. 10.Staff does not anticipate any other negative effects of the proposed use. Conditions: 1. The plans prepared by kaas wilson architects, received on June 26 and July 15, 2015, shall become a part of this approval. 2. The comments in the memo from the Engineering Division dated July 14, 2015, shall become part of this approval. 3. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Fire Department dated July 21, 2015, shall become part of this approval. 4. A sidewalk shall be constructed along the east side of the access drive in order to connect the two building entrances with the proposed sidewalk along Golden Valley Road. 5. All signage must meet the requirements of the City's Sign Code (Section 4.20). 6. The applicant must validate that there is adequate space for snow storage on site, or a have plan in place for snow removal. 7. The applicant shall provide historical parking information to staff for evaluation and confirmation that the project fits with the appropriate level of parking. 8. This approval is subject to all other state, federal, and local ordinances, regulations, or laws with authority over this development. --Short Recess-- 6. Reports on Meetings of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority, City .Council, Board of Zoning Appeals and other Meetings Baker stated that the METRO Blue Line Citizens Advisory Committee has been talking about platform placement. Goellner added that there have also been discussion about using the triangular-shaped, park board property for parking. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission July 27, 2015 Page 12 7. Other Business • Council Liaison Report No report was given. Goellner said that she has been working on a shared services agreement with St. Louis Park regarding the Central Park West development. She stated that Central Park West will also be amending their PUD soon for the office and hotel uses. Segelbaum asked about the Three-Nine-Four development. Goellner said staff is in the process of getting the final paperwork in order so the development can move forward. Segelbaum asked about the Xenia development. Goellner said that they have applied for a building permit for the parking ramp. Kluchka asked how many apartment units there are now in Golden Valley. Goellner said there are over 1,500 apartment units set to break ground in 2015 and 2016. Kluchka asked if there are any special issues or urban planning the City should be thinking about in regard to the additional apartments. Goellner said the City can handle the growth, but should be looking at multi-modal options. Baker said these are the kinds of things they should be looking at in upcoming Comprehensive Plan. Goellner stated that staff is working on the scope of the Comprehensive Plan and will start with discussing the areas of growth and doing a housing inventory. 8. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 9:27 pm. John Kluchka, Secretary Lisa Wittman, Administrative Assistant Minutes of a Regular Meeting of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals July 28, 2015 A regular meeting of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals was held on Tuesday, July 28, 2015, at City Hall, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. Chair Perich called the meeting to order at 7 pm. Those present were Members Maxwell, Nelson, Orenstein, Perich and Planning Commission Representative Waldhauser. Also present were Associate Planner/Grant Writer Emily Goellner, and Administrative Assistant Lisa Wittman. I. Approval of Minutes — June 23, 2015 Regular Meeting MOVED by Nelson, seconded by Orenstein and motion carried unanimously to approve the June 23, 2015, minutes as submitted. Waldhauser abstained from voting. II. The Petition(s) are: 1440 Winnetka Avenue North Kyle Anderson, Applicant Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Single Family Zoning District, Subd. 12(A)(2) Front Yard Setback Requirements • 4 ft. off of the required 35 ft. to a distance of 31 ft. at its closest point to the front yard (north) property line. Purpose: To allow for the construction of a 2-stall garage. Goellner explained the applicant's request to build a 672 square foot, detached garage in the southeast corner of his property. Currently, this property has no garage located on it. Goellner stated that the proposed garage would be located 31 feet from the front yard (north) property line. She stated that the applicant has said his unique circumstances are that the lot is a narrow, corner lot with two front yard setback areas which creates a smaller buildable area. Orenstein asked if the Board's approval would be subject to the existing shed on the property being located 10 feet away from the proposed new garage. Goellner said yes, she would like the applicant to verify that there will be 10 feet of separation between the existing shed and the proposed new garage. Waldhauser asked if the existing shed is located 10 feet away from the house. Goellner said she thinks it is. Kyle Anderson, Applicant, stated that the only place to put a garage on this lot is where he is proposing because the lot is only 60 feet wide and there would not be enough room Minutes of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals July 27, 2015 Page 2 anyplace else. He said he needs the size garage he is proposing (24 feet x 28 feet) because of the type of vehicle he drives. He said the proposed garage won't affect his neighbors and the house will look better with a garage and a finished driveway. He referred to the questions regarding the existing shed and stated that there is currently 10' 10" between the house and shed, and that there will be 10 to 14 feet between the existing shed and the proposed new garage. Maxwell asked if there is any garage space on the property. Anderson said no and added that there was a tuck-under garage, but that has been converted to living space. Waldhauser noted that there are curb cuts along Winnetka Avenue and along Winsdale Street and questioned which one would be used for the proposed new garage. Anderson said the new driveway would be on Winsdale Street. Perich opened the public hearing. Hearing and seeing no one wishing to comment, Perich closed the public hearing. Nelson stated that the Board tries to allow two-stall garages when possible and that she is sympathetic to corner lots because they have two front yards. She said she thinks the proposal is reasonable and meets all of the criteria used when granting variances. Waldhauser said she is concerned about the new garage being so wide that it will enclose the neighboring property to the south, but the proposed garage is meeting the side and rear yard setback requirements so she is ok with the variance as requested. Orenstein said he thinks the criteria used for granting variances have been met. Perich agreed that this is a reasonable request. MOVED by Nelson, seconded by Orenstein and motion carried unanimously to approve the variance request for 4 ft. off of the required 35 ft. to a distance of 31 ft. at its closest point to the front yard (north) property line to allow for the construction of a 2-stall garage. 705 Hanley Road James & Linda Farnham, Applicants Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Single Family Zoning District, Subd. 11(D) Side Wall Articulation Requirements • City Code requires any wall longer than 32 feet in length to be articulated. The applicant is asking that the proposed new south wall be 47 feet in length without articulation. Purpose: To allow for the construction of a bedroom/sunroom addition. Goellner explained the applicant's request to construct a bedroom/sunroom addition. She stated that the applicants are proposing to meet the side yard setback requirement, Minutes of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals July 27, 2015 Page 3 however they would like a variance from the articulation requirement. She explained that the applicant has explored other options including an addition with outward articulation of 1 ft. and an addition with inward articulation of .5 ft. both of which would require a variance because the Zoning Code requires that articulation be either inward or outward for a distance of 2 ft. for any wall long that 32 feet in length. She stated that the applicant has said their unique circumstances are that it is more expensive and difficult to articulate an addition versus new construction, an inward articulation would create small rooms, and an outward articulation of 2 ft. would encroach into the side yard setback area so they would still need a variance. She stated that staff is recommending denial of the request for a waiver of the side wall articulation requirement, however staff would recommend approval of a variance request for 1 ft. off the required 15 ft. to a distance of 14 ft. to the side yard (south) property line instead. Maxwell questioned if it really is more expensive to articulate the side wall 2 ft. versus 1 ft. Waldhauser asked if the applicant explored moving the entire addition in 2 feet to the north. Goellner said they are limited by a bay window. Jim Farnham, Applicant, stated that they purchased the house in March of this year with the idea of extending the sunroom and didn't know about the articulation requirements. He said they would consider articulating the proposed addition outward 2 ft. but going inward 2 ft. is not an option because the rooms would become too small. Waldhauser said if the living space were taken away from a bedroom she can understand why it would be too small, but if the space were taken away from a sunroom she doesn't see the problem. Farnham said the sunroom would only be 8.5 ft. wide if they articulated the wall inward, and if they built the addition longer, rather than wider they would have odd shaped rooms. He said he would like to change his variance request to ask for a side yard variance instead of a variance from the articulation requirements. Goellner clarified that the variance request in that case would be 1 ft. off of the required 15 ft. to a distance of 14 ft. at its closest point to the side yard (south) property line. Waldhauser asked the applicant if he is certain about the distance from the house to the property line. Farnham said no, he thinks the fence is a couple of feet off the property line so he is not sure if a variance for 1 foot will be enough. Maxwell said he wants to promote articulation and that a variance from the side yard setback requirements instead would not be out of character in this neighborhood, so he thinks a variance for 2 ft. off of the required 15 ft. to a distance of 13 ft. for the proposed addition would be appropriate. Nelson and Orenstein agreed. MOVED by Maxwell, seconded by Waldhauser and motion carried unanimously to approve a variance for 2 ft. off of the required 15 ft. to a distance of 13 ft. at its closest point to the side yard (south) property line to allow for the construction of a bedroom/sunroom addition. Minutes of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals July 27, 2015 Page 4 43 Western Terrace Charles Rue and Tracy Rue, Applicants Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Single Family Zoning District, Subd. 11(A)(2) Rear Yard Setback Requirements • 17 ft. off of the required 25 ft. to a distance of 8 ft. at its closest point to the rear yard (west) property line. Purpose: To allow for the construction of a home/garage addition. Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Single Family Zoning District, Subd. 12(E) Accessory Structure Requirements • 9 sq. ft. more than the allowed 1,000 square feet of accessory structure space. Purpose: To allow for the construction of a home/garage addition Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Single Family Zoning District, Subd. 11(D) Side Wall Articulation Requirements • City Code requires any wall longer than 32 feet in length to be articulated. The applicant is asking that the proposed new west wall be 32.5 feet in length without articulation. Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Single Family Zoning District, Subd. 11(D) Side Wall Articulation Requirements • City Code requires any wall longer than 32 feet in length to be articulated. The applicant is asking that the proposed new east wall be 36.4 feet in length without articulation. Goellner explained the applicant's request to construct a two story addition with an attached garage and an addition on the back of the house. She stated that the garage addition is on the side of the home, however the property line along the west is considered to be a rear yard property line. She noted that the lot originally faced Ridgeway Road and that the applicants received a variance in 2013 regarding the location of the existing tree house. Maxwell asked if the existing detached garage will remain. Goellner said yes, and stated that the applicant has said that they can't expand that garage because there are power lines above it and they can't get Xcel to bury them or move them temporarily in order to demolish and reconstruct a larger garage. Minutes of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals July 27, 2015 Page 5 Goellner discussed the requested variances regarding articulation and explained that the Zoning Code requires articulation for side walls longer than 32 feet. She stated that the new west wall of the home would be 32.5 feet in length without articulation and the proposed new east wall of the home would be 36.4 in length without articulation. She referred to the amount of accessory structure space and noted that the Zoning Code allows 1,000 square feet of accessory structure space, and in this case the applicants would have 1,009 square feet of accessory structure space when considering the treehouse, the existing and proposed new attached garage space and the existing detached garage. Goellner stated that the applicant has said their unique circumstances are that the house is not oriented toward the driveway, the rear yard is on the side of the house, the existing detached garage is only one stall, and they haven't been successful in working with Xcel regarding the power lines above it. Maxwell asked if there is a reason the driveway doesn't enter from Ridgeway Road. Goellner stated that the property used to have access from Ridgeway Road and that staff realizes the landowner did not cause the unique orientation of the house or the configuration of the streets. Maxwell referred to the proposed addition on the back on the house and noted that it could be moved over 2 ft. and the variances regarding articulation would no longer be needed. Goellner noted that the existing detached garage really is the size of a two-stall garage and suggested that maybe it could be reconfigured to function as a two-stall garage. Waldhauser said she understands that with unique lots staff has to determine the front and rear lot lines and that the intent behind the articulation requirement is to break up the view for the neighboring property, but the property to the north is really the one that would benefit from articulation in this case. Charles Rue, Applicant, stated that none of their plans have been finalized yet, so he is willing to make changes if needed. He asked about the criteria the Board uses when considering variances. Perich explained that the Board considers the reasonableness of the request, if the need for a variance is being caused by the landowner, and whether the proposal will alter the character of the locality. Nelson added that the Board also tries to be consistent in their decision making. Maxwell asked the applicant if there are ways to minimize the number of variances being requested. Rue stated that he could drop the requests regarding articulation. He stated that adding another garage stall on to the existing garage is important and will have a huge impact on the house. Nelson asked Rue how long he has lived in this house. Rue said they have lived there since 1998, but the house was brought to the lot in 1948. Minutes of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals July 27, 2015 Page 6 Maxwell asked if there is a way to reduce the amount of accessory structure space. Rue said the proposed new attached garage would be 22 ft. wide which will be tight. He stated that he has thought about expanding the existing detached garage and has tried to contact the power company about moving the power lines, but it has been impossible. Maxwell asked Rue if he has considered removing the detached garage. Rue said yes, but they would rather put that money into the new addition. Orenstein noted that there are also power lines on the west side of the property and asked how close to the proposed new addition they would be. Rue said those power lines are further away than the treehouse. Rue said he would be willing to make the proposed new garage 6 inches narrower in order to be within the allowed amount of accessory structure space. Perich stated that if the attached garage is smaller the variance request would be smaller as well. Maxwell stated that the side yard variance request would be amended to 16.5 ft. off of the required 25 ft. to a distance of 8.5 ft. to the rear yard (west) property line. Waldhauser noted that the main reason for the attached garage addition is to build the second story addition. She asked if the proposed addition on the back of the house could be moved over and the second garage stall not built. Rue said he doesn't want to have a two-story house with a one-stall garage. He said he is trying to update the "1948 dump on the block" and add value to the neighborhood. Maxwell noted that if the applicant is willing to articulate the side walls and to reduce the amount accessory structure space, he would be requesting one variance instead of four. Perich opened the public hearing. Daniel Goodwin, 135 Hanley Road, said he is the property owner to the west and he has no issues with the applicant's addition coming closer to his yard. Seeing and hearing no one else wishing to comment, Perich closed the public hearing. Orenstein referred to an email received by neighbor and asked the applicant if he has any reaction to their concerns. Rue said he would still snow-blow their driveway and won't make them move the fence that is located on his property. Orenstein asked about the treehouse being used for storage. Rue said there are two chairs and a pitching net underneath the treehouse so he feels that complaint is a little misguided. He said he thinks the main concern is that the proposed project won't get finished and stated that he is hiring professional contractors to do the work and will not be doing it himself. Nelson said the email they received sounds like the treehouse is more of an issue than the proposed addition. She clarified that the Board of Zoning Appeals granted the variance for Minutes of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals July 27, 2015 Page 7 the treehouse because it was originally built using information from an old survey, a variance was not granted to allow for the construction of the treehouse. Maxwell stated that this lot does have a unique configuration and the neighbor immediately impacted is far away from the proposed addition. He said he is inclined to grant the side yard variance request to 8.5 ft. because the unique character of the property was not caused by the landowner. Perich asked Goellner what staff would think about just granting a variance from the side yard setback requirements. Goellner said that seems to be a better idea because the west side of this property does act more like a side yard than a rear yard. Perich said he thinks granting one variance from the rear yard setback requirement is ok, but he wasn't in favor of granting the variances from the articulation requirement or for additional accessory structure space. Waldhauser said she can support the rear yard variance request if it really provides two attached garage stalls. She said she thinks the applicant could be persistent with the utility company and reconfigure the detached garage as another option. Nelson said in this neighborhood having a two-stall, attached garage is typical and appropriate. Orenstein agreed and said the proposed addition will be a vast improvement to this property. MOVED by Maxwell, seconded by Nelson and motion carried unanimously to approve a variance for 16.5 ft. off of the required 25 ft. to a distance of 8.5 ft. at its closest point to the rear yard (west) property line to allow for the construction of a garage/home addition. The applicant agreed to withdraw the other three variance requests listed on the agenda. III. Other Business No other business was discussed. IV. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 8:08 pm. David Perich, Chair Lisa Wittman, Administrative Assistant MINUTES Human Rights Commission (HRC) City of Golden Valley 7800 Golden Valley Road Golden Valley, MN 55427 Council Conference Room July 28, 2015 Commissioners present: Carla Johnson, Chair Adam Buttress Teresa Martin Susan Phelps Michael Pristash Andrew Ramlet Commissioners absent Jonathan Burris, Vice Chair Staff: Chantell Knauss, Assistant City Manager The meeting was convened at 6:33 pm by Chair Johnson. APPROVAL OF JUNE 23 2015 REGULAR MEETING MINUTES Motion by Commissioner Buttress, second by Commissioner Pristash to approve the June 23, 2015, minutes. Motion carried 6-0. One item was added to the agenda under New Business: Discussion of 2016 Gay Pride Event Idea. Authorization of Payment of Claims Motion by Commissioner Martin, second by Commissioner Buttress to authorize payment in the amount of$296.68 to reimburse Commissioner Pristash for the purchase of a 10' x 10' canopy, canopy weights, 6' collapsible table, expedited shipping and tax. Motion carried 6-0. The items will be used by the HRC at such community outreach events as Market in the Valley and the Golden Valley Music &Arts Festival. Council Updates Knauss explained there are currently two vacancies on the HRC: one regular member and one youth member. There was an applicant who was appointed to the Human Services Fund previously because there were no vacancies on the HRC. It is likely that person will be appointed to the HRC, since the HRC was their first choice. Commissioner Ramlet will promote the youth member vacancy to those he may know that are interested. Knauss will contact the staff liaison(s) to the Teen Committee and have them announce the vacancy to the Committee to see if they know of any persons that may be interested in serving on the HRC. OLD BUSINESS October 22, 2015 HRC Conversations Planning Dave Nuckles, No Wrong Door at Hennepin County—Vice Chair Burris had informed Knauss that he would be in contact with Mr. Nuckles. Human Rights Commission July 28,2015 Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 4 The Bridge for Runaway Youth — Commissioner Phelps confirmed they have agreed to participate on the panel. Breaking Free— Chair Johnson reported that they would have their speaker as the keynote for the HRC Conversations event with the honorarium to be $300. They also have a short video they would be able to show as part of the keynote. It was the consensus of the HRC to move forward with Breaking Free as the keynote speaker. Family Partnership— Chair Johnson suggested this organization be contacted at a later time for another possible HRC Conversations topic, as it seems the October event already has a full complement of panelists. First Covenant Church of Bloomington —Commissioner Martin reported her communications with this organization and it was the consensus of the HRC that the Church's mission may not be a good fit for the HRC as a public, governmental entity. Sergeant Grant Snyder—Commissioner Pristash will continue to work on making direct contact with Sergeant Snyder. Fred Karasov, 4th District Judge— Commissioner Pristash will seek to make contact with Judge Karasov as the HRC thought it would be beneficial to have a panelist from either law enforcement or the legal system to address any questions related to this area. Commission Outreach Opportunities Market in the Valley Update (July 29, 2015) Approximately 6-7 people approached the HRC Booth at Market in the Valley. One couple was not receptive to the HRC and seemed confrontational. People that were interested in serving on the HRC were directed to the City's website to apply online. Commissioner Pristash suggested an interactive activity or photos to draw people to the HRC booth. Commissioner Pristash volunteered to lead a subcommittee made up of Commissioners Martin and Ramlet to come up with an idea for the activity and bring it back to the HRC. As a way to increase awareness of the HRC and attendance at events, it was suggested that each Commissioner make a commitment to bring three (3) people with them to each HRC Conversations event. Report on Youth for Human Rights Information Commissioner Buttress reported that he reviewed the CD and information in the packet. The materials have good information and are geared primarily toward educators and students, which not meet the needs of the HRC. The HRC thanked Commissioner Buttress for reviewing the information on their behalf. NEW BUSINESS Human Rights Magnet There was discussion on the idea of a magnet or some type of give-away for the HRC outreach activities. The Commission liked the idea of the word block magnet and it was suggested to re-word it with more positive messages. Chair Johnson will check with Dee Otto as to whether or not there is a copy right on the word cloud, should the HRC want to reproduce it to give away. Commissioners Pristash and Ramlet will work on developing a unique word cloud. Recommendation on September as Hunger Action Month Proclamation Motion by Commissioner Pristash, second by Commissioner Buttress to recommend to the City Council to proclaim September as Hunger Action Month. Motion carried 6-0. Human Rights Commission July 28,2015 Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 4 This item will be on the August 18, 2015 City Council meeting at 6:30 pm for consideration. Commissioners are welcome to attend the meeting to accept the proclamation. Healing MN Stories Knauss explained she had been contacted by the City of Eden Prairie Human Rights and Diversity Commission Liaison to see if the Golden Valley HRC would be interested in participating in an opportunity to affect the art in the State Capitol Building through the "Healing Minnesota Stories" organization. There were some questions about the organization and Commissioner Martin volunteered to bring back information on "Healing Minnesota Stories" and the affecting art in the State Capitol Building project. Knauss will contact the Eden Prairie staff liaison for an update on their meeting and what the next steps they will be taking. 2016 Golden Valley Pride Event Chair Johnson explained there was a suggestion and some resident discussion on the Facebook page, I "heart" Golden Valley to hold a Golden Valley Gay Pride Event with the HRC coordinating it. The HRC discussed what it would involve to sponsor/coordinate such a large event and with the low number of attendees at their current events, were uncertain if there would be enough volunteer commitments to pull off such a large scale event. It was the consensus of the HRC that this was a good idea, but the HRC is not in a position where they would be able to take on the leadership for such an event. Commissioner Johnson will post a response on I "heart" Golden Valley explaining the HRC's discussion. Adiourn Motion by Commissioner Pristash, second by Commissioner Buttress to adjourn the meeting at 8:09 pm. Motion carried 6-0. Follow-up Items: • Commissioner Ramlet will promote the youth member vacancy to those he may know that are interested • Knauss will contact the staff liaison(s) to the Teen Committee and have them announce the vacancy to the Committee to see if they know of any persons that may be interested in serving on the HRC • Designated Commissioners will make contact with the speakers/organization yet to be contacted and report back at the July meeting: o Vice Chair Burris to contact Dave Nuckles, No Wrong Door at Hennepin County to see if he would serve as a panelist for the October 22 HRC Conversations event o Chair Johnson to contact Breaking Free to see if they have a recommended video that could be shown at the event o Commissioner Pristash to continue to work on making direct contact with Sergeant Snyder. o Commissioner Pristash will seek to make contact with Judge Karasov to see if he would serve as a panelist for the October 22 HRC Conversations event • Speaker contacts are requested to ask their speakers if they have suggestions on a contact that may be a good resource within the school communities • Commissioner Pristash to lead a subcommittee made up of Commissioners Martin and Ramlet to come up with an idea for the activity to draw people to the HRC booth at outreach events and bring it back to the HRC • Chair Johnson will check with Dee Otto as to whether or not there is a copy right on the human rights word block, should the HRC want to reproduce it to give away. • Commissioners Pristash and Ramlet will work on developing a unique word cloud for a potential magnet Human Rights Commission July 28,2015 Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 4 • Commissioner Martin volunteered to bring back information on "Healing Minnesota Stories" and the affecting art in the State Capitol Building project • Knauss to contact the Eden Prairie staff liaison for an update on their meeting and what the next steps they will be taking regarding "Healing Minnesota Stories" • Commissioner Johnson will post a response on I "heart" Golden Valley explaining the HRC's discussion on the idea of a Golden Valley Gay Pride Event Carla Johnson, Chair ATTEST: Chantell Knauss, Staff Liaison Approved by HRC:August 25,2015 Human Rights Commission July 28,2015 Meeting Minutes Page 4 of 4 city 0I;i, olden U valley Physical Development Department 763-593-8030/763-593-3988(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting September 1, 2015 Agenda Item 3. E. Authorize Cooperative Agreement with Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission for Honeywell Pond Expansion Project No. 14-20 Prepared By Jeff Oliver, PE, City Engineer Eric Seaburg, EIT, Engineer Summary The Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission (BCWMC) has determined that it is in the best interest of its member communities and the watershed to expand the stormwater pond located West of Douglas Drive at Duluth Street. A feasibility report was prepared by WSB and accepted by the BCWMC in October of 2014. In an effort to streamline construction of the pond and include the project with the Douglas Drive Reconstruction Project, a BCWMC major plan amendment was required. The plan amendment was necessary so that the project could be expedited. The Honeywell Pond project has been on hold since the acceptance of the feasibility report and commencement of the major plan amendment process. The amendment process was completed in August 2015, and the City can now formally enter into a cooperative agreement with the watershed for the project. The Honeywell Pond Project feasibility report calls for an increase in the size and depth of Honeywell Pond, thus creating additional water quality and flood volumes. An increase in water quality volume will increase phosphorus removal, suspended solid removal, and increase overall treatment of local water runoff before it enters Bassett Creek. The feasibility report also calls for a large natural buffer strip around the pond to act as a filter for water runoff and enhance natural habitat. Lastly, the feasibility report includes a water reuse system that will pump water from Honeywell Pond to the irrigation system at the Sandburg School athletic fields, where the City is currently working to convert the fields to a soccer complex. On August 20, 2015, the BCWMC adopted a resolution ordering the project and designating Golden Valley as the member City to implement the project. The attached Cooperative Agreement for the project identifies a capped project amount of$1,260,930 of which the City is contributing$450,000. The City's contributions will be coming from the 2015-2019 Capital Improvement Funds (SS-40 & 55-45). The estimated schedule for the project is as follows: Approve Cooperative Agreement with BCWMC September 1, 2015 Award Construction Contract February 2016 Construction Fall 2016 - Spring 2017 Hennepin County will be the construction contract holder of the Honeywell Pond construction project due to its construction as part of the Douglas Drive corridor reconstruction project. However, the City will retain its right to provide inspection and oversight of the project in accordance with the Cooperative Agreement with the BCWMC. The City will transfer contract administration rights of the Honeywell Pond Expansion Project to Hennepin County in an upcoming Douglas Drive Cooperative Agreement with the County. Attachments • Location Map (1 page) • Cooperative Agreement between the Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission and the City (5 pages) Recommended Action Motion Authorizing the Cooperative Agreement for the Honeywell Pond Expansion Project between the Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission and the City of Golden Valley. ' ..., ... 1, �I Ln0 i T�� I V � r833� N azx � c a a L CL / 3 E '. ' co C � j � • d I COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT (Honeywell Pond Expansion Project) This Agreement is made as of this 20d' day of August, 2015, by and between the Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission, a joint powers watershed management organization (hereinafter the"Commission"), and the City of Golden Valley, a Minnesota municipal corporation (hereinafter the"City"). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Commission adopted the Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission Watershed Management Plan on September 16, 2004 (the "Plan"), a watershed management plan within the meaning of Minn. Stat. § 103B.231;and WHEREAS, the Plan, as amended, includes a capital improvement program ("CIP") that lists a number of water quality project capital improvements;and WHEREAS, one of the water quality projects identified in the CIP is a water quality improvement project described as the Honeywell Pond Expansion Project (BC4) in the City of Golden Valley (the "Project"), as more fully described in the feasibility report for the Project prepared by WSB & Associates, Inc., entitled Feasibility Report for Honeywell Pond Enhancement/Improvement Project dated July 14, 2015, which is attached and made a part hereof (the"Feasibility Report");and WHEREAS,the amended cost estimate for the Project is$1,260,930; and WHEREAS, the Plan specifies that the Project will be funded by a County tax levy under Minn. Stat. § 103B.251;and WHEREAS,on August 20,2015,the Commission adopted a resolution ordering the Project and directing that it be constructed by the City;and WHEREAS, project costs were certified to Hennepin County, which will levy taxes throughout the watershed for the Project costs in 2015 for collection and settlement in 2016;and WHEREAS, the City is willing to construct the Project on the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth. NOW, THEREFORE, ON THE BASIS OF THE PREMISES AND MUTUAL COVENANTS HEREINAFTER SET FORTH,THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. Project. The Project will consist of expanding the size and depth of Honeywell Pond, diverting low flows into the pond from the storm sewer line in Douglas Drive, 1 4654790 TJG BA295-47 and creating a buffer area around the perimeter of the pond, as described in the Feasibility Report for the Project. 2. Design and Plans. The City will design the Project and prepare plans and specifications for construction of the Project. The 501/o and 90% plans and specifications, and any changes to such plans and specifications, shall be submitted to the Commission for approval. Minor change orders that do not materially change either the effectiveness of the Project to meet its intended purposes or the environmental impacts of the Project may be approved by the City without requiring approvals by the Commission. 3. Contract Administration. The City will advertise for bids and award contracts in accordance with the requirements of law. The City will award the contract and supervise and administer the construction of the Project to ensure that it is completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. The contract may only be let to a responsible contract in accordance with Minn. Stat. § 16C.285 and the City will require the contractor to provide all payment and performance bonds required by law. The City will require the Contractor to name the Commission as additional insured on all liability policies required by the City of the contractor and the Commission shall be given the same notification of cancellation or non-renewal as is given to the City. The City will require the contractor to defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless the Commission and the City, their agents, officers, and employees,from all claims or actions arising from negligent acts,errors or omissions of the contractor. The City will supervise the work of the contractor. However, the Commission may observe and review the work of the Project until it is completed The City will display a sign at the construction site stating "Paid for by the Taxpayers of the Bassett Creek Watershed". 4. Contract PUMents. The City will pay the contractor and all other expenses related to the construction of the Project and keep and maintain complete records of such costs incurred. 5. Commission Reimbursement. The Commission will use its best efforts to secure payment from the County in accordance with Minn. Stat. § 103B.251 in the amount of Eight Hundred Ten Thousand Nine Hundred and Thirty Dollars($810,930) by tax levy in 2015 for collection in 2015. The total reimbursement will not exceed Eight Hundred Ten Thousand Nine Hundred and Thirty Dollars ($810,930), less Commission expenses. Out-of-pocket costs related to the Project, incurred and paid by the Commission including, but not limited to, feasibility studies, publication of notices, securing County tax levy, preparation of contracts, review of proposed contract documents, administration of this contract and up to a 2.5%administrative charge shall be repaid from the amount specified above from funds received in the tax settlement from Hennepin County. All such funds in excess of such expenses are available for reimbursement to the City for costs incurred by the City in the design and 2 4654790 TJO BA29547 construction of the Project. Reimbursement to the City will be made as soon as funds are available,provided a request for payment has been received from the City that contains such detailed information as may be requested by the Commission to substantiate costs and expenses. The City shall complete and submit with its final reimbursement request to the Commission a final report on the Project using the Commission's final reporting form and providing such other information as may be requested by the Commission. 6. Limits on Reimbursement. Reimbursement to the City will not exceed the amount specified above from the amount received from the County for the Project, less any amounts retained by the Commission for Commission expenses. Reimbursement will not be increased by grants or other revenues received by the Commission for the Project. Reimbursement will not exceed the costs and expenses incurred by the City for the Project, less any amounts the City receives for the Project as grants from other sources. All costs of the Project incurred by the City in excess of such reimbursement, which are currently estimated to be Four Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($450,000), shall be borne by the City or secured by the City from other sources. 7. Audit. All City books,records,documents,and accounting procedures related to the Project are subject to examination by the Commission. S. Environmental Review. The City will perform all necessary investigations of site contamination and secure all necessary local, state, or federal permits required for the construction of the Project and will not proceed with the Project until any required environmental review and remediation of site contamination is completed or a plan for remediation is approved by appropriate regulatory agencies. 9. Ongoing Maintenance. Upon completion of the Project, the City will assume responsibility for its ongoing maintenance. 10. Data Practices. The City shall retain and make available data related to the letting of contracts and construction of the Project in accordance with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act. 11. Term. This Agreement shall be in effect as of the date first written above and shall terminate once the project is completed and the Commission has completed its reimbursement payments to the City as provided herein. 3 4654790 TJG BA295.47 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized officers on behalf of the parties as of the day and date first above written. BASSETT CREEK WATERSHED MANAGEMENT COMMISSION By: char And by: lecre'ary Date: 0 2 4 4654790 TJO BA29547 CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY By: Its Mayor And by: Its Manager Date: 5 465479v5 TJG BA29547 city 0IIM► olden MEMORANDUM alley Administrative Services Department 763-593-8013/763-593-3969(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting September 1, 2015 Agenda Item 3. F. Set December 1, 2015 Public Hearing Date for 2016 Levy and Budget Prepared By Sue Virnig, Finance Director Summary Staff recommends that the City Council set Tuesday, December 1, 2015, at 7 p.m. for the budget and levy public hearing. M.S.275.06 now requires that the City adopt a proposed budget and levy and certify the proposed budget and levy to the county auditor by September 30. The county auditor will use this information to prepare and send parcel specific notices between November 11 and November 24. The meeting date and time need to be announced at the time of the adoption of the preliminary levy and budget. Recommended Action Motion to set the date of the Truth-in-Taxation public hearing for Tuesday, December 1, 2015, at 7 pm. city 0f ~01den MEMORANDUM b 1 1 Administrative Services Department 763-593-8013/763-593-3969(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting September 1, 2015 Agenda Item 3. G. Second Consideration -Amendment to the 2015 Master Fee Schedule for Increase in Water Rates starting October 1, 2015 Prepared By Sue Virnig, Finance Director Summary Second consideration of the Ordinance will provide an amendment to the 2015 Master Fee Schedule to increase water rates by 30 cents per 1000 gallons for those billings after October 1, 2015. The revenue from this rate increase will pay for the repair to the 36 inch pipe reconstruction for the Golden Valley-Crystal- New Hope Joint Water Commission. The first consideration of this ordinance was presented at the August 18, 2015 Council meeting. If the Council adopts the ordinance on second consideration, it will be effective upon publication and the increase will be effective October 1, 2015. Attachments 0 Ordinance#579, Amendments to the 2015 Master Fee Schedule for Water Rates (1 page) Recommended Action Motion to adopt second consideration, Ordinance#579, amending the 2015 Master Fee Schedule for Water Rates starting October 1, 2015. ORDINANCE NO. 579, 2ND SERIES AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE Amending the 2015 Master Fee Schedule for Water Rates The City Council for the City of Golden Valley hereby ordains: Section 1. The Master Fee Schedule in Chapter 25 for Water Rates of the City Code is hereby amended as the City's Utility Billing Rates effective October 1, 2015, as follows: Residential Utility Rates - Quarterly Billing - Water Fees Above 1,000 gallons of flow per quarter up to 79,000 (per 1,000 gallons) 5.30 80,000 gallons and over of flow per quarter (per 1,000 gallons) 5.33 Irrigation Accounts (All) - Monthly Billing Minimum fee, includes up to 1,000 gallons of flow 9.00 Above 1,000 gallons of flow per month (per 1,000 gallons) 5.30 Commercial & Industry Monthly Billing - Water Usage Water rate above 1,000 gallons 5.30 Section 2. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" is hereby adopted in its entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law. Adopted by the City Council this 1St day of September, 2015. /s/Shepard M. Harris Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: /s/Kristine A. Luedke Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk city 0 golI41ey MEMORANDUM a Finance Department 763-593-8013/763-593-8109(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley Council Meeting September 1, 2015 Agenda Item 3. H. Call for Public Hearing- Certification of Special Assessments Prepared By Sue Virnig, Finance Director Summary At this meeting, the City Council should call for a public hearing for October 6, 2015, at 7 pm to consider certifying the following special assessments: 2015 Delinquent Utility Bills 2015 Miscellaneous Charges - Includes false alarm responses, weed cutting, administrative citations,tree removals, etc. Recommended Action Motion to call a public hearing for certification of special assessments for Tuesday, October 6, 2015at7pm. city 0f goldenvvk-,*4ft� MEMORANDUM valley Physical Development Department 763-593-8030/763-593-3988(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting September 1, 2015 Agenda Item 4. A. Public Hearing-Adopting Redevelopment Plan for Winnetka & Medicine Lake Road Redevelopment Project Area, establishing TIF District, Liberty Crossing, and adopting the Tax Increment Financing Plan. Prepared By Marc Nevinski, Physical Development Director Summary The City Council is asked to hold a public hearing prior to consideration of a Resolution adopting both the Redevelopment Plan for Winnetka & Medicine Lake Road Redevelopment Project Area, and establish Tax Increment Financing (Redevelopment) District, Liberty Crossing, within Winnetka & Medicine Lake Road Redevelopment Project Area and adopt the tax increment financing plan. The district and project area are located at the southeast quadrant of Winnetka Avenue and Medicine Lake Road. Intuitive Investment proposes to redevelop industrial and commercial properties in the project area into multi-family housing in the form of an apartment building and townhomes. Tax increment will help to fund infrastructure improvements in the area to reduce flooding on Medicine Lake Road and in the DeCola Ponds sub-watershed district. LHB, Inc. has inspected the properties proposed for inclusion in the district, documented their condition, and found them to meet the "structurally substandard" and "coverage ratio" tests required for the establishment of a redevelopment TIF district, which can run for up to 25 years. Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) staff and the developer are currently discussing the design and configuration of the infrastructure, and the final plan and development agreement will determine how the increment is allocated. The HRA will review and consider the development agreement at a future date. On July 14, 2015, staff informed the HRA of the project and the intent to begin the establishment of a TIF district. The HRA also adopted at the same meeting Resolution 15-03 adopting Redevelopment Plan for the Winnetka and Medicine Lake Road Redevelopment Project Area. On July 31, 2015,the County and School district received the statutorily required impact letters. Public hearing notices were published in the SunPost newspaper on August 20, 2015. On August 24, 2015, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution 15-01 finding that the Development was in conformance with the City's Comprehensive plan. The project received final PUD approval from the City Council on July 21, 2015. Attachments • Resolution Adopting The Redevelopment Plan For Winnetka & Medicine Lake Road Redevelopment Project Area; And Establishing Tax Increment Financing District (Redevelopment), Liberty Crossing, Within Winnetka & Medicine Lake Road Redevelopment Project Area And Adopting A Tax Increment Financing Plan Therefor (3 pages) • Redevelopment Plan for Winnetka & Medicine Lake Road Redevelopment Project (22 pages) • Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing (Redevelopment) District within Winnetka & Medicine Lake Road Redevelopment Project Area (22 pages) Recommended Action Motion to adopt Resolution Adopting Redevelopment Plan for Winnetka & Medicine Lake Road Redevelopment Project Area and Establishing TIF District, Liberty Crossing, within the Winnetka & Medicine Lake Road Redevelopment Project Area and Adopting a Tax Increment Financing Plan. Resolution 15-71 September 1, 2015 Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR WINNETKA & MEDICINE LAKE ROAD REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA; AND ESTABLISHING TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT (REDEVELOPMENT), LIBERTY CROSSING, WITHIN WINNETKA & MEDICINE LAKE ROAD REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA AND ADOPTING A TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN THEREFOR Be It Resolved, by the City Council (the "Council") of the City of Golden Valley, Minnesota (the "City"), as follows: Section 1. Recitals 1.01. The Housing and Redevelopment Authority (the "Authority") has previously adopted a redevelopment plan (the "Project Plan") and redevelopment project under Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 to 469.047, designated as Winnetka & Medicine Lake Road Redevelopment Project Area (the "Project Area"). The Project Plan has been transmitted to the planning agency of the City, which has determined that the Project Plan conforms to the general plan for the development of the City. It has been proposed that the City adopt the Project Plan and establish Tax Increment Financing District (Redevelopment), Liberty Crossing, (the "District") within Winnetka & Medicine Lake Road Redevelopment Project Area and adopt a TIF Plan (the "TIF Plan") therefor (the Project Plan and the TIF Plan are referred to collectively herein as the "Plans"); all pursuant to and in conformity with applicable law, including Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 to 469.047 and Sections 469.174 to 469.1794, all inclusive, as amended (the "Act"), all as reflected in the Plans, and presented for the Council's consideration. 1.02. The Authority and the City have investigated the facts relating to the Plans and have caused the Plans to be prepared. 1.03. The Authority and the City have performed all actions required by law to be performed prior to the establishment of the Project Area and the District and the adoption and approval of the proposed Plans, including, but not limited to, notification of Hennepin County and Independent School District No. 281 having taxing jurisdiction over the property to be included in the District, a review of and written comment on the Plans by the City Planning Commission, approval of the Plans by the Authority on July 14, 2015, and the holding of a public hearing upon published notice as required by law. 1.04. Certain written reports (the "Reports") relating to the Plans and to the activities contemplated therein have heretofore been prepared by staff and consultants and submitted to the Council and/or made a part of the City files and proceedings on the Plans. The Reports include data, information and/or substantiation constituting or relating to the basis for the other findings and determinations made in this resolution. The Council hereby confirms, ratifies and adopts the Reports, which are hereby incorporated into and made as fully a part of this resolution to the same extent as if set forth in full herein. Section 2. Findings for the Adoption and Approval of the Project Plan. On the basis of the proposed Project Plan and the information elicited from consultation with the planning Resolution 15-71 continued September 1, 2015 agency and at the public hearing referred to in Section 1.03, it is hereby found, determined and declared: 2.01. The Project Plan proposes that the City undertake certain redevelopment activities for the purpose of encouraging the redevelopment of properties in the Project Area. 2.02. The land in the Project Area would not be made available for development without the financial aid to be sought since private development could not economically develop the Project Area without the proposed development activities. 2.03. The Project Plan will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for the redevelopment of the District by private enterprise. The redevelopment activities contemplated in the Project Plan would help to retard blight in the Project Area and provide an increase in employment and housing opportunities in the City and enhance the tax base of the City and overlapping taxing jurisdictions. 2.04. The redevelopment activities proposed by the Project Plan conform to the general plan for the development or redevelopment of the City as a whole. The development activities are compatible with the City's zoning ordinances and other related regulations and encourage efficient use of existing infrastructure as set forth in the City's Land Use Plan. 2.05. The Project Plan provides an outline for the development or redevelopment of the Project Area and is sufficiently complete to indicate its relationship to definite local objectives as to appropriate land uses and to indicate general land uses and general standards of development or redevelopment. Section 3. Findings for the Establishment of Tax Increment Financing District (Redevelopment), Liberty Crossing Winnetka & Medicine Lake Road Redevelopment Project Area 3.01. The Council hereby finds that the District is in the public interest and is a "redevelopment district" under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subd. 10(a)(1) of the Act. 3.02. The Council further finds that (i) the proposed redevelopment would not occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future, (ii) the increased market value of the site that could reasonably be expected to occur without the use of tax increment financing would be less than the increase in the market value estimated to result from the proposed development after subtracting the present value of the projected tax increments for the maximum duration of the District permitted by the TIF Plan, (iii) the Plans conform to the general plan for the development or redevelopment of the City as a whole, and (iv) the Plans will afford maximum opportunity consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for the development or redevelopment of the District by private enterprise. 3.03. The Council further finds, declares and determines that the City made the above findings stated in this Section and has set forth the reasons and supporting facts for each determination in writing, in Section E and Section J of the TIF Plan for the District. Resolution 15-71 continued September 1, 2015 Section 4. Public Purpose 4.01. The adoption of the Plans conforms in all respects to the requirements of the Act and will help fulfill a need to develop an area of the City which is already built up, to provide employment opportunities, to improve the tax base and to improve the general economy of the State and thereby serves a public purpose. For the reasons described in Section 3 above, the City believes these benefits directly derive from the tax increment assistance provided under the TIF Plan. A private developer will receive only the assistance needed to make this development financially feasible. As such, any private benefits received by a developer are incidental and do not outweigh the primary public benefits. Section 5. Approval and Adoption of the Plans 5.01. The Plans, as presented to the Council on this date, including without limitation the findings and statements of objectives contained therein, are hereby approved, ratified, established, and adopted and shall be placed on file in the office of the City Manager. 5.02. The staff of the City, the City's advisors and legal counsel are authorized and directed to proceed with the implementation of the Plans and to negotiate, draft, prepare and present to this Council for its consideration all further plans, resolutions, documents and contracts necessary for this purpose. 5.03. The Auditor of Hennepin County is requested to certify the original net tax capacity of the District, as described in the Plans, and to certify in each year thereafter the amount by which the original net tax capacity has increased or decreased; and the Authority is authorized and directed to forthwith transmit this request to the County Auditor in such form and content as the Auditor may specify, together with a list of all properties within the District, for which building permits have been issued during the 18 months immediately preceding the adoption of this resolution. 5.04. The City Manager is further authorized and directed to file a copy of the Plans with the Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Revenue and the Office of the State Auditor pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 469.175, Subd. 4a. Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by the City Clerk. Redevelopment Plan for Winnetka & Medicine Lake Road Redevelopment Project Location: Southeast Quadrant of Winnetka Avenue and Medicine Lake Road Golden Valley, Minnesota i REVIEW AND APPROVAL DATES Golden Valley HRA Approval: July 14, 2015 Planning Commission Review: Approved by the City Council: TABLE OF CONTENTS Page(s) Introduction.................................................................................................................3 Project Area Boundaries.............................................................................................3 Background..................................................................................................................3 Redevelopment Opportunities..................................................................................3 PublicImprovements..................................................................................................4 Statement of Need and Public Purpose, Statutory Authorization........................4 Statement of Objectives.............................................................................................4 Itemized Goals and Objectives..................................................................................5 Policies..........................................................................................................................6 LandUse................................................................................................................6 Financing................................................................................................................7 Transportation......................................................................................................8 Definitions.....................................................................................................................8 Administration of Redevelopment Project..............................................................8 Maintenance and Operations..........................................................................8 Paymentof Public Costs....................................................................................8 Property Acquisition and Proposed Reuse....................................................8 Relocation............................................................................................................9 Environmental Controls; Land Use Regulations.............................................9 Park and open Space to be Created.................................................................9 Amendments.......................................................................................................9 Mapof the Project Area............................................................................................10 2 Introduction In the 1960's the area southeast of the intersection of Medicine Lake Road and Winnetka Avenue North was developed with a variety low density commercial and industrial oriented uses. Overtime, development patterns in the region have become more urban in form, real estate markets have changed and development patterns have resulted in flooding in the area. Recently, encouraged by interest from the private sector, the City of Golden Valley has taken the initiative to re-guide and rezoned many of the parcels to accommodate new higher density residential land uses and address the flooding issues in the area. This document serves as the Redevelopment Plan for the area, to be known as the Winnetka & Medicine Lake Road Redevelopment Project. It defines the geographic area of proposed improvements, outlines existing conditions, discusses anticipated redevelopment, and sets goals, objectives and policies that will guide projects as they are implemented. Project Area Boundaries The Redevelopment Plan Project Area extends from Medicine Lake Road south to 23rd Avenue North and from Winnetka Avenue east to the Canadian Pacific Railroad tracks. Parcels containing DeCola Ponds A, B and C are also included in the Project Area.The map in Exhibit A illustrates the boundaries of Project Area which includes private parcels and public lands and rights of way.The Project Area matches the boundaries of a proposed tax increment financing redevelopment project area where up to twenty five percent of the TIF proceeds could be spent, most likely for infrastructure improvements. Background The Project Area was originally low lands.Aerial photographs from 1945 show wetlands and agricultural land uses. The area began to develop in the 1960's with low density commercial and industrial uses. Wetlands were filled and portions of the area remained low. Overtime, the existing development has trended towards obsolesce and investment in the buildings has diminished. A recent study by LHB Inc. found a number of buildings to be "substandard" under Minnesota TIF statutes. Currently the area includes a small auto repair shop, two restaurants (a walk-up and a sit down style), a multi-tenant building owned by the local VFW club, a small car wash, a newly developed drug store, a vacant industrial building, and self-storage facility.The east side of the Project Area includes a multi-family housing development and Pennsylvania Park, which includes two flood storage ponds.To the south, is an additional pond and a single family neighborhood. Flooding in the area is common, although it is not in a federally mapped flood plain. A study is currently nearing completion that will document the cause of the flooding and identify specific measures to reduce the flooding in the area by creating more flood storage. A proposed multi- family development project provides an opportunity to construct and fund additional flood storage in the area. 3 Redevelopment Opportunities In early 2015, a developer proposed redeveloping four parcels within the Project Area with townhomes and a large apartment building. If completed, the redevelopment would utilize approximately fifty percent of the land within the Project Area. Other redevelopment opportunities may emerge over time on small individual parcels or a combination of parcels within the Project Area. Public Improvements Public improvements proposed for the Project Area include the development of additional flood storage to reduce flooding in the DeCola Ponds sub-watershed area and ensure that the Medicine Lake Road and Winnetka Avenue intersection remain passable to emergency vehicles during a flood event. Flood storage may include the construction of underground vaults, the creation of new open storage or the expansion of existing open storage, and the construction of conveyance swale or pipe to move water at a controlled rate through the area. Additionally, removal of some portions of Rhode Island Avenue North may occur to reduce storm water runoff and provide flood storage and conveyance. Finally, trail connections in the area, particularly from redeveloped areas to existing parkland. Statement of Need and Public Purpose, Statutory Authorization The Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) finds there is a need for development within the City and the Project Area in order to provide housing opportunities, to improve the local tax base, address public infrastructure needs, and to improve the general economy of the City and the State. The economic security of residents depends upon proper development of property that meets any one of a number of conditions, including properties with values too low to pay for the public services required or rendered and properties where lack of use or improper use has resulted in stagnant or unproductive land that could otherwise contribute to the public health, safety, and welfare. The HRA finds that in many cases, such property cannot be developed without public participation and assistance in various forms, including property acquisition and/or write-down; proper planning; the financing of development costs associated with clearance, grading, and soils correction; and various other public and private improvements necessary for development. In cases where the development of property cannot be done by private enterprise alone, the HRA believes it to be in the public interest to consider the exercise of its powers, to advance and spend public money, and to provide the means and impetus for such development. The HRA finds that in certain cases, property within the Project Area would or may not be available for development without the specific financial aid to be sought, that the Redevelopment Plan will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the needs of the City as a whole, for the development of the Project Area by private enterprise, and that the Redevelopment Plan conforms to the general plan for the development of the City as a whole. Statement of Objectives The HRA seeks to achieve one or more of the following objectives with respect to the Project Area, as the Authority may deem appropriate and necessary: 4 • Promote and secure the prompt development of property within the Project Area, such property which is not now in its most productive use, in a manner consistent with the Comprehensive Plan of the City, thus realizing Comprehensive Plan land use, and tax base goals. • Assist development in the Project Area through the acquisition or write-down of certain interest in property which is not now in productive use or in its highest and best use, to make or defray the cost of soil corrections or site improvements on said property, and to construct or reimburse for the construction of public improvements and other facilities on or for the benefit of said property and the public, thereby promoting and securing the development of other land within the Project Area. • Secure the increase and availability of rental housing property for individuals and families of low to moderate income within the Project Area. • Secure the increase of industrial and commercial property subject to taxation within the Project Area. • Promote and secure additional employment opportunities within the City and to prevent the loss of existing employment opportunities, thereby preventing the loss of valuable human resources. • To provide funding for an ongoing development strategy and to prioritize the use of available resources. • Implement and revise from time to time, as may be deemed necessary or desirable, a consolidated and unified Redevelopment Plan and to finance the associated development costs on an area-wide basis. • Employ any of the powers of the Authority for the benefit of the Project Area in such cases and upon such terms as the Authority may deem appropriate. • Construct or acquire facilities deemed desirable for the development of the Project Area. Itemized Goals and Objectives To achieve its mission of structured redevelopment,this Plan has identified the following goals with related objectives for this Project Area to encourage cohesive planning and structured renewal within the area. It then outlines policies that will help to achieve the goals and objectives. Goal 1—Redevelop obsolete properties Objectives: • Redevelop blighted, functionally obsolete and/or economically unsustainable buildings. • Establish new uses compatible with existing uses. • Spur reinvestment in the broader area through new development and an expanded market. 5 Goal 2—Create additional flood storage in the DeCola Ponds sub-watershed Objectives: • Use redevelopment to create and fund the construction of additional flood storage in the Project Area. • Ensure new development, at a minimum, does not reduce existing flood storage. • Minimize the impact of flooding on private properties and structures. Goal 3—Expand housing opportunities Objectives: • Increase housing choices and options within Golden Valley. • Promote quality, sustainable and green construction and development. • Require amenities as part of new development that improve quality of life for residents. Goal 4—Protect the environment Objectives: • Ensure wetlands are protected and enhanced. • Reduce or eliminate soil and wetland contamination. • Preserve quality vegetation and reduce or eliminate invasive or disease-susceptible species. Goal 5—Maintain a regional framework Objectives: • Plan for growth compatible with the Metropolitan Council development framework. • Design public infrastructure in cooperation with other public agencies. • Participate in grant programs available through Hennepin County, the Metropolitan Council and other agencies. • Develop and maintain positive relationships with surrounding communities and governmental agencies. • Continue participation in cooperative traffic management strategies. • Improve transit options. Policies Land Use The City will study planned land uses to determine the need or desirability of individual parcels or area-wide comprehensive plan or zoning amendments to accommodate desired land uses. The City and HRA will assure that its review processes, zoning and building regulations will promote desired development projects. The City will assure that new uses in the redevelopment area are compatible with existing development and the City's Land Use Plan. The City and HRA will review existing properties in the area to consider their long term viability and/or options for alternative uses. 6 Land use plans will promote mixed use developments and increased density where appropriate, in keeping with the Metropolitan Council's regional growth strategy. Financing The City and HRA will identify criteria to target redevelopment funds such as tax increment financing, tax abatements, Livable Communities, Community Development Block Grants, Hennepin County and other funding made available by the Legislature, other agencies or governmental units. The City and HRA will consider providing public assistance to redevelopment projects that serve a substantial public purpose, remove blight, or mitigate contamination. The City and HRA will consider using land write-downs to subsidize redevelopment projects. Redevelopment funding will be paired with other funding options such as assessments based on the Golden Valley Special Assessment Policy. The City will consider franchise fees and utility surcharges to underwrite the cost of utility and infrastructure upgrades. Design and Environmental Standards The City will promote best practices to meet the highest environmental standards. The City and HRA will identify approaches and/or incentives to promote a corridor beautification program.This program will include both public and private components. The City will monitor ongoing research on sustainable development initiatives to guide redevelopment and future updates of this plan. Transportation The City will work with Metro Transit to monitor transportation needs of area residents and workers and to identify ways to improve transportation services, including improving transit routes and working with area businesses to develop transportation management plans. Definitions The terms defined in the section have the meanings given herein, unless the context in which they are used indicates a different meaning: "Authorit ' means the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Golden Valley. "City" means the City of Golden Valley, Minnesota, also referred to as a "Municipality". "City Council" means the City Council of the City. "County" means Hennepin County, Minnesota. "Governing Body" means the Board of Commissioners of the Authority. 7 "HRA Act" means the Minnesota Municipal Housing and Redevelopment Act, Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 through 469.047, both inclusive. "Land Use Regulations" means all federal, state and local laws, rules, regulations, ordinances and plans relating to or governing the use or development of land in the Project Area, including but not limited to environmental, platting, zoning and building code laws, regulations and ordinances. "Project Area" means the geographic area of the Winnetka & Medicine Lake Road Redevelopment Project Area. "Public Costs" means the costs of land acquisition, public and site improvements, repayment of debt service on tax increment bonds, and other eligible costs as set forth in the Redevelopment Plan and Tax Increment Financing Plan(s). "Redevelopment Plan" means the Redevelopment Plan for the Project Area. "State" means the State of Minnesota. "TIF Act" means Minnesota Statures, Section 469.174 through 469.1799, both inclusive. "TIF District" means any tax increment financing district presently established or to be established in the future in the Project Area. "TIF Plan" means the respective tax increment financing plan for each TIF district located within the Project Area. Administration of Redevelopment Project Maintenance and Operations Maintenance and operation of the Project Area will be the responsibility of the HRA Director, who shall serve as administrator of the Project Area. Each year the administrator will submit to the Governing Body the maintenance and operation budget for the following year. The administrator will administer the Redevelopment Plan pursuant to the provision of the HRA Act, provided,that such powers may only be exercised at the direction of the Governing Body. No action taken by the administrator pursuant to the above-mentioned powers shall be effective without authorization by the Governing Body. Payment of Public Costs It is anticipated that the Public Costs of the Project Area will be paid primarily from tax increments or proceeds of tax increment bonds. Such costs are identified in the TIF Plan(s)for the corresponding TIF District(s) located within the Project Area.The Authority reserves the right to use other sources of revenue legally applicable to the Project Area to pay for such Public Costs including, but not limited to, special assessments,federal or state funds, and investment income. Property Acquisition and Proposed Reuse The HRA may acquire property or appropriate interest therein within the Project Area as it deems necessary or desirable to assist in the implementation of the Redevelopment Plan. 8 The Redevelopment Plan contemplates that the HRA may acquire property and reconvey the same to another entity. Prior to formal consideration of the acquisition of any property, the Governing Body will require the execution of a binding development agreement with respect thereto and evidence that tax increments or other funds will be available to repay the Public Costs associated with the proposed acquisition. It is the intent of the HRA to negotiate the acquisition of property whenever possible. Appropriate restrictions regarding the reuse and redevelopment of property shall be incorporated into any development agreement to which the HRA is a party. Relocation Any person or business that is displaced as a result of the Redevelopment Plan will be relocated in accordance with the provisions of the HRA Act and other applicable law. Environmental Controls; Land Use Regulations All HRA actions, public improvements, and private development shall be carried out in a manner consistent with existing environmental controls and all applicable Land Use Regulations. Park and Open Space to be Created Park and open space created within the Project Area will be done so in accordance with the zoning and platting ordinances of the City. Amendments The HRA reserves the right to alter and amend the Redevelopment Plan subject to the provisions of state law regulating such action. 9 Exhibit A Redevelopment Plan Project Area Project Area �1t ttN tom—— 7751 2540 J 7774 7751 2512 25_'.'0 7750 2581 - 245D 2500 2400 2114 2430 Z 2 2180 1es > 2002w 24 5 :a, t > ^ems M 2401 � 2430 O 2335 t 2300 2700 23` v e N \\ 230 y .x. 7 'IV 2115 -_ Q.c d.205 Q _ 2200 2WS�( �'2140 2201 2112 C2110 2w 2124 2120 �caCINC co - 2120, � 7]dD� 2100 70_ 2120 —.., ( 2r2s + 7IOD\ 200 [7- 778W 0 1 7111 17411 7720 7700 7010 7020 7600 I -W 75201 7500 a 74501 � a�2aos� 2105 Y --- -- Winnetka Height'" 7106 2054'` 2oeo earl 01001, 7751 2oe1 200 700r 7551 2a' 20q 20355 2°'0 ^030 20?1 XX ! 2021 2020 am tam 2021 12020 20- 020 1 2 2015 E 2020 2000 200, 2000 200: 2" c;,, tit Winnetka & golden,,, Medicine Lake Rd Coww_.� , hO 4'l Lims ►noroo..on,r:o,:, Redevelopment Plan -aaof0ownvaerro...oe,e.ayeaAV . Project Area 10 Winnetka & Medicine Lake Road Redevelopment Plan Project Area Parcels PID# BLDG# STREET NAME CITY ZIP 2911821220001 2550 WINNETKA AVE N GOLDEN VALLEY 55427 2911821220002 7825 MEDICINE LAKE RD GOLDEN VALLEY 55427 2911821220005 2911821220006 2400 RHODE ISLAND AVE N GOLDEN VALLEY 55427 2911821220012 2480 WINNETKA AVE N GOLDEN VALLEY 55427 2911821220014 2430 WINNETKA AVE N GOLDEN VALLEY 55427 2911821220015 2485 RHODE ISLAND AVE N GOLDEN VALLEY 55427 2911821220017 2300 WINNETKA AVE N GOLDEN VALLEY 55427 2911821220018 7751 MEDICINE LAKE RD GOLDEN VALLEY 55427 2911821220019 2500 WINNETKA AVE N GOLDEN VALLEY 55427 2911821230002 11 Redevelopment Plan for Winnetka & Medicine Lake Road Redevelopment Project Location: Southeast Quadrant of Winnetka Avenue and Medicine Lake Road Golden Valley, Minnesota i REVIEW AND APPROVAL DATES Golden Valley HRA Approval: July 14, 2015 Planning Commission Review: Approved by the City Council: TABLE OF CONTENTS Page(s) Introduction.................................................................................................................3 Project Area Boundaries.............................................................................................3 Background..................................................................................................................3 Redevelopment Opportunities..................................................................................3 PublicImprovements..................................................................................................4 Statement of Need and Public Purpose, Statutory Authorization........................4 Statementof Objectives.............................................................................................4 Itemized Goals and Objectives..................................................................................5 Policies..........................................................................................................................6 LandUse................................................................................................................6 Financing................................................................................................................7 Transportation......................................................................................................8 Definitions.....................................................................................................................8 Administration of Redevelopment Project..............................................................8 Maintenance and Operations..........................................................................8 Paymentof Public Costs....................................................................................8 Property Acquisition and Proposed Reuse....................................................8 Relocation............................................................................................................9 Environmental Controls; Land Use Regulations.............................................9 Park and open Space to be Created.................................................................9 Amendments.......................................................................................................9 Mapof the Project Area............................................................................................10 2 Introduction In the 1960's the area southeast of the intersection of Medicine Lake Road and Winnetka Avenue North was developed with a variety low density commercial and industrial oriented uses. Overtime, development patterns in the region have become more urban in form, real estate markets have changed and development patterns have resulted in flooding in the area. Recently, encouraged by interest from the private sector, the City of Golden Valley has taken the initiative to re-guide and rezoned many of the parcels to accommodate new higher density residential land uses and address the flooding issues in the area. This document serves as the Redevelopment Plan for the area, to be known as the Winnetka& Medicine Lake Road Redevelopment Project. It defines the geographic area of proposed improvements, outlines existing conditions, discusses anticipated redevelopment, and sets goals, objectives and policies that will guide projects as they are implemented. Project Area Boundaries The Redevelopment Plan Project Area extends from Medicine Lake Road south to 23rd Avenue North and from Winnetka Avenue east to the Canadian Pacific Railroad tracks. Parcels containing DeCola Ponds A, B and C are also included in the Project Area.The map in Exhibit A illustrates the boundaries of Project Area which includes private parcels and public lands and rights of way.The Project Area matches the boundaries of a proposed tax increment financing redevelopment project area where up to twenty five percent of the TIF proceeds could be spent, most likely for infrastructure improvements. Background The Project Area was originally low lands. Aerial photographs from 1945 show wetlands and agricultural land uses.The area began to develop in the 1960's with low density commercial and industrial uses. Wetlands were filled and portions of the area remained low. Overtime, the existing development has trended towards obsolesce and investment in the buildings has diminished. A recent study by LHB Inc. found a number of buildings to be "substandard" under Minnesota TIF statutes. Currently the area includes a small auto repair shop, two restaurants (a walk-up and a sit down style), a multi-tenant building owned by the local VFW club, a small car wash, a newly developed drug store, a vacant industrial building, and self-storage facility.The east side of the Project Area includes a multi-family housing development and Pennsylvania Park, which includes two flood storage ponds.To the south, is an additional pond and a single family neighborhood. Flooding in the area is common, although it is not in a federally mapped flood plain. A study is currently nearing completion that will document the cause of the flooding and identify specific measures to reduce the flooding in the area by creating more flood storage. A proposed multi- family development project provides an opportunity to construct and fund additional flood storage in the area. 3 Redevelopment Opportunities In early 2015, a developer proposed redeveloping four parcels within the Project Area with townhomes and a large apartment building. If completed, the redevelopment would utilize approximately fifty percent of the land within the Project Area. Other redevelopment opportunities may emerge over time on small individual parcels or a combination of parcels within the Project Area. Public Improvements Public improvements proposed for the Project Area include the development of additional flood storage to reduce flooding in the DeCola Ponds sub-watershed area and ensure that the Medicine Lake Road and Winnetka Avenue intersection remain passable to emergency vehicles during a flood event. Flood storage may include the construction of underground vaults,the creation of new open storage or the expansion of existing open storage, and the construction of conveyance swale or pipe to move water at a controlled rate through the area. Additionally, removal of some portions of Rhode Island Avenue North may occur to reduce storm water runoff and provide flood storage and conveyance. Finally,trail connections in the area, particularly from redeveloped areas to existing parkland. Statement of Need and Public Purpose, Statutory Authorization The Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) finds there is a need for development within the City and the Project Area in order to provide housing opportunities, to improve the local tax base, address public infrastructure needs, and to improve the general economy of the City and the State. The economic security of residents depends upon proper development of property that meets any one of a number of conditions, including properties with values too low to pay for the public services required or rendered and properties where lack of use or improper use has resulted in stagnant or unproductive land that could otherwise contribute to the public health, safety, and welfare. The HRA finds that in many cases, such property cannot be developed without public participation and assistance in various forms, including property acquisition and/or write-down; proper planning; the financing of development costs associated with clearance, grading, and soils correction; and various other public and private improvements necessary for development. In cases where the development of property cannot be done by private enterprise alone, the HRA believes it to be in the public interest to consider the exercise of its powers, to advance and spend public money, and to provide the means and impetus for such development. The HRA finds that in certain cases, property within the Project Area would or may not be available for development without the specific financial aid to be sought, that the Redevelopment Plan will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the needs of the City as a whole, for the development of the Project Area by private enterprise, and that the Redevelopment Plan conforms to the general plan for the development of the City as a whole. Statement of Objectives The HRA seeks to achieve one or more of the following objectives with respect to the Project Area, as the Authority may deem appropriate and necessary: 4 • Promote and secure the prompt development of property within the Project Area, such property which is not now in its most productive use, in a manner consistent with the Comprehensive Plan of the City, thus realizing Comprehensive Plan land use, and tax base goals. • Assist development in the Project Area through the acquisition or write-down of certain interest in property which is not now in productive use or in its highest and best use, to make or defray the cost of soil corrections or site improvements on said property, and to construct or reimburse for the construction of public improvements and other facilities on or for the benefit of said property and the public, thereby promoting and securing the development of other land within the Project Area. • Secure the increase and availability of rental housing property for individuals and families of low to moderate income within the Project Area. • Secure the increase of industrial and commercial property subject to taxation within the Project Area. • Promote and secure additional employment opportunities within the City and to prevent the loss of existing employment opportunities, thereby preventing the loss of valuable human resources. • To provide funding for an ongoing development strategy and to prioritize the use of available resources. • Implement and revise from time to time, as may be deemed necessary or desirable, a consolidated and unified Redevelopment Plan and to finance the associated development costs on an area-wide basis. • Employ any of the powers of the Authority for the benefit of the Project Area in such cases and upon such terms as the Authority may deem appropriate. • Construct or acquire facilities deemed desirable for the development of the Project Area. Itemized Goals and Objectives To achieve its mission of structured redevelopment,this Plan has identified the following goals with related objectives for this Project Area to encourage cohesive planning and structured renewal within the area. It then outlines policies that will help to achieve the goals and objectives. Goal 1—Redevelop obsolete properties Objectives: • Redevelop blighted, functionally obsolete and/or economically unsustainable buildings. • Establish new uses compatible with existing uses. • Spur reinvestment in the broader area through new development and an expanded market. 5 Goal 2—Create additional flood storage in the DeCola Ponds sub-watershed Objectives: • Use redevelopment to create and fund the construction of additional flood storage in the Project Area. • Ensure new development, at a minimum, does not reduce existing flood storage. • Minimize the impact of flooding on private properties and structures. Goal 3—Expand housing opportunities Objectives: • Increase housing choices and options within Golden Valley. • Promote quality, sustainable and green construction and development. • Require amenities as part of new development that improve quality of life for residents. Goal 4—Protect the environment Objectives: • Ensure wetlands are protected and enhanced. • Reduce or eliminate soil and wetland contamination. • Preserve quality vegetation and reduce or eliminate invasive or disease-susceptible species. Goal 5—Maintain a regional framework Objectives: • Plan for growth compatible with the Metropolitan Council development framework. • Design public infrastructure in cooperation with other public agencies. • Participate in grant programs available through Hennepin County, the Metropolitan Council and other agencies. • Develop and maintain positive relationships with surrounding communities and governmental agencies. • Continue participation in cooperative traffic management strategies. • Improve transit options. Policies Land Use The City will study planned land uses to determine the need or desirability of individual parcels or area-wide comprehensive plan or zoning amendments to accommodate desired land uses. The City and HRA will assure that its review processes, zoning and building regulations will promote desired development projects. The City will assure that new uses in the redevelopment area are compatible with existing development and the City's Land Use Plan. The City and HRA will review existing properties in the area to consider their long term viability and/or options for alternative uses. 6 Land use plans will promote mixed use developments and increased density where appropriate, in keeping with the Metropolitan Council's regional growth strategy. Financing The City and HRA will identify criteria to target redevelopment funds such as tax increment financing, tax abatements, Livable Communities, Community Development Block Grants, Hennepin County and other funding made available by the Legislature, other agencies or governmental units. The City and HRA will consider providing public assistance to redevelopment projects that serve a substantial public purpose, remove blight, or mitigate contamination. The City and HRA will consider using land write-downs to subsidize redevelopment projects. Redevelopment funding will be paired with other funding options such as assessments based on the Golden Valley Special Assessment Policy. The City will consider franchise fees and utility surcharges to underwrite the cost of utility and infrastructure upgrades. Design and Environmental Standards The City will promote best practices to meet the highest environmental standards. The City and HRA will identify approaches and/or incentives to promote a corridor beautification program.This program will include both public and private components. The City will monitor ongoing research on sustainable development initiatives to guide redevelopment and future updates of this plan. Transportation The City will work with Metro Transit to monitor transportation needs of area residents and workers and to identify ways to improve transportation services, including improving transit routes and working with area businesses to develop transportation management plans. Definitions The terms defined in the section have the meanings given herein, unless the context in which they are used indicates a different meaning: "Authority" means the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Golden Valley. "City" means the City of Golden Valley, Minnesota, also referred to as a "Municipality". "City Council" means the City Council of the City. "County" means Hennepin County, Minnesota. "Governing Body" means the Board of Commissioners of the Authority. 7 "HRA Act" means the Minnesota Municipal Housing and Redevelopment Act, Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 through 469.047, both inclusive. "Land Use Regulations" means all federal, state and local laws, rules, regulations, ordinances and plans relating to or governing the use or development of land in the Project Area, including but not limited to environmental, platting, zoning and building code laws, regulations and ordinances. "Project Area" means the geographic area of the Winnetka & Medicine Lake Road Redevelopment Project Area. "Public Costs" means the costs of land acquisition, public and site improvements, repayment of debt service on tax increment bonds, and other eligible costs as set forth in the Redevelopment Plan and Tax Increment Financing Plan(s). "Redevelopment Plan" means the Redevelopment Plan for the Project Area. "State" means the State of Minnesota. "TIF Act" means Minnesota Statures,Section 469.174 through 469.1799, both inclusive. "TIF District" means any tax increment financing district presently established or to be established in the future in the Project Area. "TIF Plan" means the respective tax increment financing plan for each TIF district located within the Project Area. Administration of Redevelopment Project Maintenance and Operations Maintenance and operation of the Project Area will be the responsibility of the HRA Director, who shall serve as administrator of the Project Area. Each year the administrator will submit to the Governing Body the maintenance and operation budget for the following year. The administrator will administer the Redevelopment Plan pursuant to the provision of the HRA Act, provided,that such powers may only be exercised at the direction of the Governing Body. No action taken by the administrator pursuant to the above-mentioned powers shall be effective without authorization by the Governing Body. Payment of Public Costs It is anticipated that the Public Costs of the Project Area will be paid primarily from tax increments or proceeds of tax increment bonds. Such costs are identified in the TIF Plan(s) for the corresponding TIF District(s) located within the Project Area.The Authority reserves the right to use other sources of revenue legally applicable to the Project Area to pay for such Public Costs including, but not limited to, special assessments,federal or state funds, and investment income. Property Acquisition and Proposed Reuse The HRA may acquire property or appropriate interest therein within the Project Area as it deems necessary or desirable to assist in the implementation of the Redevelopment Plan. 8 The Redevelopment Plan contemplates that the HRA may acquire property and reconvey the same to another entity. Prior to formal consideration of the acquisition of any property,the Governing Body will require the execution of a binding development agreement with respect thereto and evidence that tax increments or other funds will be available to repay the Public Costs associated with the proposed acquisition. It is the intent of the HRA to negotiate the acquisition of property whenever possible. Appropriate restrictions regarding the reuse and redevelopment of property shall be incorporated into any development agreement to which the HRA is a party. Relocation Any person or business that is displaced as a result of the Redevelopment Plan will be relocated in accordance with the provisions of the HRA Act and other applicable law. Environmental Controls; Land Use Regulations All HRA actions, public improvements, and private development shall be carried out in a manner consistent with existing environmental controls and all applicable Land Use Regulations. Park and Open Space to be Created Park and open space created within the Project Area will be done so in accordance with the zoning and platting ordinances of the City. Amendments The HRA reserves the right to alter and amend the Redevelopment Plan subject to the provisions of state law regulating such action. 9 Exhibit A Redevelopment Plan Project Area QProject Area _Got —ieino Lake Rd —- -7s 2550 7W X775 7751 - 77so =� :ass 2500 2M 2111 :036 - 2M Z 1 � z 2375 i ?.IOC , A We N 2200 21 SS\ 23015 2220 2fIS �y fT Cil - 7 �D b ? 2200 2136 j �214V 2201 S C� 2w 2125 2120 ?G. 212E 2120 \ 2100 7000. f 7 7 7 70x0 7010 7100 n20 7700 7010 020 000 510 7520 750D am z I I I n'°I i Imo,. innetka Heir 7 2005 ti 200°_ 2"1 7751 2W1 ,OW 70Oi i 1551 2011 i 2W TM 2?15 2000 ^O30 2031 2020 2021 __ 2021 2010 2021 2014 20211. 2020 ,2015 202D coos j- --- '1?^0 X-1 „ ,00.1 - ..,.. -—- _ Xw 20L" 2000 , (Ih0 Winnetka 8 �OYCti 901den Medicine Lake Rd vallaRedevelopment Plan ?nur 4asev ro•acore•a ea Project Area 10 Winnetka & Medicine Lake Road Redevelopment Plan Project Area Parcels PID# BLDG# STREET NAME CITY ZIP 2911821220001 2550 WINNETKA AVE N GOLDEN VALLEY 55427 2911821220002 7825 MEDICINE LAKE RD GOLDEN VALLEY 55427 2911821220005 2911821220006 2400 RHODE ISLAND AVE N GOLDEN VALLEY 55427 2911821220012 2480 WINNETKA AVE N GOLDEN VALLEY 55427 2911821220014 2430 WINNETKA AVE N GOLDEN VALLEY 55427 2911821220015 2485 RHODE ISLAND AVE N GOLDEN VALLEY 55427 2911821220017 2300 WINNETKA AVE N GOLDEN VALLEY 55427 2911821220018 7751 MEDICINE LAKE RD GOLDEN VALLEY 55427 2911821220019 2500 WINNETKA AVE N GOLDEN VALLEY 55427 2911821230002 11 City of Golden Valley, Minnesota Golden Valley Housing and Redevelopment Authority Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing (Redevelopment) District Within Winnetka & Medicine Lake Road Redevelopment Project Area (Liberty Crossing Project) Draft: July 30, 2015 Public Hearing: September 1, 2015 Prepared by: SPRINGSTED INCORPORATED 380 Jackson Street,Suite 300 St. Paul, MN 55101-2887 (651)223.3000 WWW.SPRINGSTED.COM TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page(s) A. Definitions...................................................................................................................................................................................1 B. Statutory Authorization.............................................................................................................................................1 C. Statement of Need and Public Purpose...................................................................................................................1 D. Statement of Objectives............................................................................................................................................1 E. Designation of Tax Increment Financing District as a Redevelopment District.........................................................1 F. Duration of the TIF District........................................................................................................................................3 G. Property to be Included in the TIF District................................................................................................................3 H. Property to be Acquired in the TIF District................................................................................................................4 I. Specific Development Expected to Occur Within the TIF District..............................................................................4 J. Findings and Need for Tax Increment Financing......................................................................................................4 K. Estimated Public Costs............................................................................................................................................5 L. Estimated Sources of Revenue................................................................................................................................6 M. Estimated Amount of Bonded Indebtedness............................................................................................................6 N. Original Net Tax Capacity.........................................................................................................................................6 0. Original Local Tax Rate............................................................................................................................................7 P. Projected Retained Captured Net Tax Capacity and Projected Tax Increment.......................................................7 Q. Use of Tax Increment..............................................................................................................................................8 R. Excess Tax Increment.............................................................................................................................................9 S. Tax Increment Pooling and the Five Year Rule.......................................................................................................9 T. Limitation on Administrative Expenses....................................................................................................................9 U. Limitation on Property Not Subject to Improvements-Four Year Rule...................................................................9 V. Estimated Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions...................................................................................................10 W. Prior Planned Improvements.................................................................................................................................11 X. Development Agreements.....................................................................................................................................11 Y. Assessment Agreements.......................................................................................................................................11 Z. Modifications of the Tax Increment Financing Plan...............................................................................................11 AA. Administration of the Tax Increment Financing Plan...........................................................................................12 AB. Filing TIF Plan,Financial Reporting and Disclosure Requirements....................................................................13 Map of the Tax Increment Financing District within the Project Area......................................................EXHIBIT I AssumptionsReport..............................................................................................................................EXHIBIT II Projected Tax Increment Report............................................................................................................EXHIBIT III Estimated Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions Report...................................................................... EXHIBIT IV Market Value Analysis Report............................................................................................................... EXHIBIT V Executive Summary TIF District Qualification Report........................................................................... EXHIBIT VI Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Golden Valley, Minnesota Section A Definitions The terms defined in this section have the meanings given herein, unless the context in which they are used indicates a different meaning: "Authority"means the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Golden Valley. "City",means the City of Golden Valley, Minnesota;also referred to as a"Municipality". "City Council"means the City Council of the City;also referred to as the'Governing Body". "County„ means Hennepin County, Minnesota, "Redevelopment Project Area" means the Winnetka & Medicine Lake Road Project Area in the City, which is described in the corresponding Redevelopment Plan. "Redevelopment Plan" means the Redevelopment Plan for the Winnetka& Medicine Lake Road Project Area, "Project Area" means the geographic area of the Redevelopment Project Area "School District" means Independent School District No,281, Minnesota. "State" means the State of Minnesota. "TIF Act" means Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 through 469.1794, as amended, both inclusive. "TIF District" means Tax Increment Financing(Redevelopment)District the Liberty Crossing Project. "TIF Plan"means the tax increment financing plan for the TIF District(this document). Section B Statutory Authorization See"Statutory Authorization"on page 4 of the Redevelopment Plan for the Project Area, Section C Statement of Need and Public Purpose See"Statement of Need and Public Purpose"on page 4 of the Redevelopment Plan for the Project Area. Section D Statement of Objectives See"Statement of Objectives"on pages 4-5 of the Redevelopment Plan for the Project Area. Section E Designation of Tax Increment Financing District as a Redevelopment District Redevelopment districts are a type of tax increment financing district in which one or more of the following conditions exists and is reasonably distributed throughout the district: (1) parcels comprising at least 70% of the area of the district are occupied by buildings, streets, utilities, paved or gravel parking lots, or other similar structures and more than 50% of the buildings, not including outbuildings, are structurally substandard requiring substantial renovation or clearance. A parcel is deemed SPRINGSTED Page 1 Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Golden Valley, Minnesota "occupied" if at least 15% of the area of the parcel contains buildings, streets, utilities, paved or gravel parking lots;or other similar structures. (2) the property consists of vacant, unused, underused, inappropriately used, or infrequently used railyards, rail storage facilities,or excessive or vacated railroad right-of-ways;or (3) tank facilities, or property whose immediately previous use was for tank facilities, as defined in section 115C.02,subdivision 15, if the tank facilities: (i) have or had a capacity of more than 1,000,000 gallons; (ii) are located adjacent to rail facilities; and (iii) have been removed or are unused, underused, inappropriately used,or infrequently used. (iv) A qualifying disaster area,as defined in subdivision 10b. For districts consisting of two more noncontiguous areas, each area must individually qualify under the provisions listed above, as well as the entire area must also qualify as a whole. The TIF District qualifies as a redevelopment district in that it meets all of the criteria listed in(1)above. An executive summary of a report prepared by LHB, Inc.that details the qualifications is included in Exhibit VI. A copy of the entire report with supporting facts and documentation for this determination is on file with the City and is available to the public upon request. The full report will be retained by the City for the life of the TIF District. "Structurally substandard" is defined as buildings containing defects in structural elements or a combination of deficiencies in essential utilities and facilities, light and ventilation, fire protection including adequate egress, layout and condition of interior partitions, or similar factors which defects or deficiencies are of sufficient total significance to justify substantial renovation or clearance. Generally, a building is not structurally substandard if it is in compliance with the building code applicable to a new building, or could be modified to satisfy the existing code at a cost of less than 15%of the cost of constructing a new structure of the same size and type. A city may not find that a building is structurally substandard without an interior inspection, unless it can not gain access to the property and there exists evidence which supports the structurally substandard finding. Such evidence includes recent fire or police inspections, on-site property tax appraisals or housing inspections, exterior evidence of deterioration, or other similar reliable evidence. Written documentation of the findings and reasons why an interior inspection was not conducted must be made and retained. A parcel is deemed to be occupied by a structurally substandard building if the following conditions are met: (1) the parcel was occupied by a substandard building within three years of the filing of the request for certification of the parcel as part of the district; (2) the demolition or removal of the substandard building was performed or financed by the City, or was performed by a developer under a development agreement with the City, (3) the City found by resolution before such demolition or removal occurred that the building was structurally substandard and that the City intended to include the parcel in the TIF district,and (4) the City notifies the county auditor that the original tax capacity of the parcel must be adjusted upon filing the request for certification of the tax capacity of the parcel as part of a district. In the case of(4)above,the County Auditor shall certify the original net tax capacity of the parcel to be the greater of (a)the current tax capacity of the parcel, or (b)a computed tax capacity of the parcel using the estimated market value of the parcel for the year in which the demolition or removal occurred, and the appropriate classification rate(s) for the current year. At least 90 percent of the tax increment from a redevelopment district must be used to finance the cost of correcting conditions that allow designation as a redevelopment district. These costs include, but are not limited to, acquiring properties containing structurally substandard buildings or improvements or hazardous substances, pollution, or SPRINGSTED Page 2 Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Golden Valley, Minnesota contaminants, acquiring adjacent parcels necessary to provide a site of sufficient size to permit development, demolition and rehabilitation of structures, clearing of land, removal of hazardous substances or remediation necessary to develop the land, and installation of utilities, roads, sidewalks, and parking facilities for the site. The allocated administrative expenses of the City may be included in the qualifying costs. Section F Duration of the TIF District Redevelopment districts may remain in existence 25 years from the date of receipt of the first tax increment. The City anticipates that the TIF District will remain in existence the maximum duration allowed by law(projected to be though the year 2043). Modification of this plan (see Section AA) shall not extend these limitations, All tax increments from taxes payable in the year the TIF District is decertified shall be paid to the City. Pursuant to MN Statutes, Section 469.175, Subdivision 1(b),the City elects to delay receipt of first increment until 2017. Section G Property to be Included in the TIF District The TIF District is an approximately 10.86acre area of land located within the Development District. A map showing the location of the TIF District within the Project Area is shown in Exhibit I. The boundaries and area encompassed by the TIF District are described below: Parcel Number* Legal Description 2911821220018 Lot 1, Block 1, Golden Valley VFW Post Number 7051, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Being Registered land as is evidenced by Certificate of Title No, 1325613. 2911821220012 The West 374 feet of the North 205 feet of the South 860 feet of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 29,Township 118, Range 21,except the West 33 feet thereof, according to the United States Government Survey thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Together with an easement for ingress and egress over the following described property:The North 30 feet of the North 655 feet of the South 860 feet of that part of the northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 29,Township 118, Range 21, lying West of the East 704 feet thereof, except the West 374 feet of the North 205 feet of the South 860 feet of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 29, Township 118, Range 21,as shown in deed Document No, 2476007; And together with an easement for private roadway as evidenced by Document No. 1287516. Being Registered land as is evidenced by Certificate of Title No. 1305335. 2911821220015 Lot 2, Block 1, McTac Addition according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. 2911821220014 Lot 1, Block 1, McTac Addition,according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Being Registered land as is evidenced by Certificate of Title No.689295. The area encompassed by the TIF District shall also include all street or utility right-of-ways located upon or adjacent to the property described above. SPRINGSTED Page 3 Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Golden Valley, Minnesota Section H Property to be Acquired in the TIF District The City may acquire and sell any or all of the property located within the TIF District; however, the City may undertake the acquisition of property for the installation of public utilities within the TIF District. Section I Specific Development Expected to Occur Within the TIF District The proposed project includes the redevelopment of the existing Liberty Crossing site, into a 247-unit apartment and townhome development. The redevelopment will also include corresponding public improvements for stormwater mitigation purposes,and other extraordinary costs associated with the redevelopment of the site. The City anticipates using tax increment to reimburse the Developer for a portion of the TIF eligible project costs occurred in the development of the Facility. Included in the projected eligible costs to be reimbursed are costs associated with demolition of existing buildings, site work, public and private utility improvements including stormwater management infrastructure,and other eligible improvements associated with the project. Additionally,the City anticipates using tax increment to finance public improvements and site work on property located within the Redevelopment Project Area, along with related administrative expenses. Construction of the project is expected to begin in 2016, and be completed by 2017, The development is projected to be 100%assessed and on the tax rolls as of January 2,2018 for taxes payable in 2019. At the time this document was prepared there were no signed construction contacts with regards to the above described development. Section J Findings and Need for Tax Increment Financing In establishing the TIF District,the City makes the following findings: (1) The TIF District qualifies as a redevelopment district; See Section E of this document for the reasons and facts supporting this finding. (2) The proposed development, in the opinion of the City, would not reasonably be expected to occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and the increased market value of the site that could reasonably be expected to occur without the use of tax increment financing would be less than the increase in the market value estimated to result from the proposed development after subtracting the present value of the projected tax increments for the maximum duration of the district permitted by the TIF Plan. Factual basis: Proposed development not expected to occur.- The ccur:The development includes the construction of a 247-unit apartment and townhome development along with public improvements for stormwater mitigation. A key component to the redevelopment is the reimbursement of eligible expenses through tax increments. The Developer has indicated they would not undertake the proposed development without the financial assistance. Without the assistance the City has no reason to expect that significant reinvestment in the site would occur without assistance similar to that provided in this plan. Therefore the City has no reason to believe the development would occur but-for the use of tax increment assistance. SPRINGSTED Page 4 Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Golden Valley, Minnesota To summarize the basis for the City's findings regarding alternative market value, in accordance with Minnesota Statutes,Section 469.175,Subd.3(d),the City makes the following determinations: a, The City's estimate of the amount by which the market value of the site will increase without the use of tax increment financing is anywhere from $0 (except for a small amount for annual appreciation of land value) b, If the proposed development to be assisted with tax increment occurs in the District,the total increase in market value would be approximately$52,898,562, including the value of the building(See Exhibit V). C. The present value of tax increments from the District for the maximum duration of the district permitted by the TIF Plan is estimated to be$8,954,046(See Exhibit V) d. Even if some development other than the proposed development were to occur,the Council finds that no alternative would occur that would produce a market value increase greater than $43,944,516(the amount in clause b less the amount in clause c)without tax increment assistance. (3) The TIF Plan will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole,for development of the TIF District by private enterprise. Factual basis: The proposed development is the construction of 247-unit apartment and townhome redevelopment, in the Development District that is expected to create substantial new tax base for the City and the state. The development clearly meets the City's housing and redevelopment goals of creating additional housing;additionally,the development meets the agency's goal of the removal of blight. (4) The TIF Plan conforms to general plans for development of the City as a whole, Factual basis: The City Planning Commission has determined that the development proposed in the TIF Plan conforms to the City comprehensive plan. (5) The City does not elect the method of tax increment computation set forth in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177, Subdivision 3(b); therefore subdivision 3(a) shall apply which indicates the original net tax capacity and the current net tax capacity shall be determined before the application of the fiscal disparity provisions(see method(a)in Section P). Section K Estimated Public Costs The estimated public costs of the TIF District are listed below. Such costs are eligible for reimbursement from tax increments of the TIF District, TIF Budget $7,913,693 Interest 9,193,746 Administrative Expenses 1,900,824 County Administrative Expenses 44 321 Total $19,052,584 The City reserves the right to administratively adjust the amount of any of the items listed above or to incorporate additional eligible items, so long as the total estimated public cost is not increased. The City reserves the right to spend available tax increment outside of the TIF District boundaries but within the Project Area. SPRINGSTED Page 5 Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Golden Valley, Minnesota Section L Estimated Sources of Revenue Tax Increment revenue Net of OSA Reduction $19,052,584 Interest on invested funds 0 Bond proceeds 0 Loan proceeds 0 Grants 0 Other 0 Total $19,052,584 The City anticipates using future tax increments for reimbursement of public costs incurred from Section K. As increments are collected from the TIF District in future years, a portion of these tax increments will be reserved by the City as reimbursement for public costs incurred (primarily for public infrastructure improvements), either through internal funding or general obligation or revenue debt. The City also reserves the ability to provide financial assistance to the proposed development through the use of pay-as-you-go financing. With pay-as-you-go financing, as tax increments are collected from the TIF District in future years, a portion of these tax increments, if utilized, will be distributed to the developer as reimbursement for eligible costs incurred related to the redevelopment of the site. The City reserves the right to finance any or all public costs of the TIF District using pay-as-you-go assistance, internal funding, general obligation or revenue debt, or any other financing mechanism authorized by law. The City also reserves the right to use other sources of revenue legally applicable to the TIF District to pay for such costs including,but not limited to,special assessments,utility revenues,federal or state funds,and investment income. Section M Estimated Amount of Bonded Indebtedness The City may consider issuing tax increment bonds to finance all or a portion of the estimated public costs, and reserves the right to issue such bonds in an amount not to exceed$19,052,584(total estimated public costs), Section N Original Net Tax Capacity The County Auditor shall certify the original net tax capacity of the TIF District. This value will be equal to the total net tax capacity of all property in the TIF District as certified by the State Commissioner of Revenue. For districts certified between January 1 and June 30, inclusive, this value is based on the previous assessment year. For districts certified between July 1 and December 31, inclusive,this value is based on the current assessment year. The Authority intends to file the request for certification after to July 1, 2015. Therefore, the original net tax capacity will be the net tax capacity as of January 2, 2015. The Estimated Market Value of all property within the TIF District as of January 2, 2015,for taxes payable in 2016, is $4,103,000, and is classified as commercial property. Upon redevelopment the site will be classified as rental property. Therefore, the estimated tax capacity is $51,288, following the reclassification of the property to rental, which is estimated to be the original net tax capacity of the TIF District. Each year the County Auditor shall certify the amount that the original net tax capacity has increased or decreased as a result of: (1) changes in the tax-exempt status of property; (2) reductions or enlargements of the geographic area of the TIF District; (3) changes due to stipulation agreements or abatements;or SPRINGSTED Page 6 Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Golden Valley, Minnesota (4) changes in property classification rates. Section 0 Original Local Tax Rate The County Auditor shall also certify the original local tax rate of the TIF District. This rate shall be the sum of all local tax rates that apply to property in the TIF District. This rate shall be for the same taxes payable year as the original net tax capacity. In future years,the amount of tax increment generated by the TIF District will be calculated using the lesser of(a)the sum of the current local tax rates at that time or(b)the original local tax rate of the TIF District. At the time this document was prepared,the sum of all local tax rates that apply to the property in the TIF District,for taxes levied in 2015 and payable in 2016, was not yet available. When this total becomes available, the County Auditor shall certify this amount as the original tax capacity rate of the TIF District. For purposes of estimating tax increment generated by the TIF District, the final local tax rates for taxes levied in 2014 and payable in 2015, is 144.811%as shown below. 2014/2015 Taxing Jurisdiction Local Tax Rate City of Golden Valley 54.626% Hennepin County 46.398% ISD#281 33.226% Other 10.561% Total 144.811% Section P Projected Retained Captured Net Tax Capacity and Projected Tax Increment The City anticipates that development will be initiated in 2016, and completed in 2017 creating a total tax capacity for the TIF District of $348,810 as of January 2, 2016. The captured tax capacity as of that date is estimated to be $297,523 and the first-year of tax increment is estimated to be $430,845 payable in 2017. A complete schedule of estimated tax increment from the TIF District is shown in Exhibit III. The estimates shown in this TIF Plan assume that rental class rates will remain constant at 1,25%, The projections also assume a 2%annual increase in market values. Each year the County Auditor shall determine the current net tax capacity of all property in the TIF District. To the extent that this total exceeds the original net tax capacity, the difference shall be known as the captured net tax capacity of the TIF District. For communities affected by the fiscal disparity provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 473F and Chapter 276A, the original net tax capacity of the TIF District shall be determined before the application of fiscal disparity. In subsequent years, the current net tax capacity shall either(a)be determined before the application of fiscal disparity or(b)exclude the product of any fiscal disparity increase in the TIF District (since the original net tax capacity was certified)times the appropriate fiscal disparity ratio. The method the City elects shall remain the same for the life of the TIF District, except that a single change may be made at any time from method(a) to method(b) above. »The City elects method(a),or M.S.Section 469.177, Subdivision 3(a). SPRINGSTED Page 7 Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Golden Valley, Minnesota The County Auditor shall certify to the City the amount of captured net tax capacity each year. The City may choose to retain any or all of this amount. It is the City's intention to retain 100% of the captured net tax capacity of the TIF District. Such amount shall be known as the retained captured net tax capacity of the TIF District. Exhibit II gives a listing of the various information and assumptions used in preparing a number of the exhibits contained in this TIF Plan, including Exhibit III which shows the projected tax increment generated over the anticipated life of the TIF District, Section Q Use of Tax Increment Each year the County Treasurer shall deduct 0.36% of the annual tax increment generated by the TIF District and pay such amount to the State's General Fund, Such amounts will be appropriated to the State Auditor for the cost of financial reporting and auditing of tax increment financing information throughout the state. Exhibit III shows the projected deduction for this purpose over the anticipated life of the TIF District. The City has determined that it will use 100% of the remaining tax increment generated by the TIF District for any of the following purposes: (1) pay for the estimated public costs of the TIF District (see Section K) and County administrative costs associated with the TIF District(see Section T); (2) pay principal and interest on tax increment bonds or other bonds issued to finance the estimated public costs of the TIF District; (3) accumulate a reserve securing the payment of tax increment bonds or other bonds issued to finance the estimated public costs of the TIF District; (4) pay all or a portion of the county road costs as may be required by the County Board under M.S. Section 469,175, Subdivision 1a;or (5) return excess tax increments to the County Auditor for redistribution to the City, County and School District. Tax increments from property located in one county must be expended for the direct and primary benefit of a project located within that county, unless both county boards involved waive this requirement. Tax increments shall not be used to circumvent levy limitations applicable to the City, Tax increment shall not be used to finance the acquisition, construction, renovation, operation, or maintenance of a building to be used primarily and regularly for conducting the business of a municipality,county, school district,or any other local unit of government or the State or federal government, or for a commons area used as a public park, or a facility used for social, recreational, or conference purposes. This prohibition does not apply to the construction or renovation of a parking structure or of a privately owned facility for conference purposes. If there exists any type of agreement or arrangement providing for the developer, or other beneficiary of assistance, to repay all or a portion of the assistance that was paid or financed with tax increments, such payments shall be subject to all of the restrictions imposed on the use of tax increments. Assistance includes sale of property at less than the cost of acquisition or fair market value, grants, ground or other leases at less then fair market rent, interest rate subsidies, utility service connections, roads, or other similar assistance that would otherwise be paid for by the developer or beneficiary, SPRINGSTED Page 8 Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Golden Valley, Minnesota Section R Excess Tax Increment In any year in which the tax increments from the TIF District exceed the amount necessary to pay the estimated public costs authorized by the TIF Plan,the City shall use the excess tax increments to: (1) prepay any outstanding tax increment bonds; (2) discharge the pledge of tax increments thereof; (3) pay amounts into an escrow account dedicated to the payment of the tax increment bonds;or (4) return excess tax increments to the County Auditor for redistribution to the City, County and School District. The County Auditor must report to the Commissioner of Education the amount of any excess tax increment redistributed to the School District within 30 days of such redistribution. Section S Tax Increment Pooling and the Five-Year Rule At least 75%of the tax increments from the TIF District must be expended on activities within the district or to pay for bonds used to finance the estimated public costs of the TIF District (see Section E for additional restrictions), No more than 25% of the tax increments may be spent on costs outside of the TIF District but within the boundaries of the Project Area, except to pay debt service on credit enhanced bonds. All administrative expenses are considered to have been spent outside of the TIF District. Tax increments are considered to have been spent within the TIF District if such amounts are: (1) actually paid to a third party for activities performed within the TIF District within five years after certification of the district; (2) used to pay bonds that were issued and sold to a third party,the proceeds of which are reasonably expected on the date of issuance to be spent within the later of the five-year period or a reasonable temporary period or are deposited in a reasonably required reserve or replacement fund. (3) used to make payments or reimbursements to a third party under binding contracts for activities performed within the TIF District, which were entered into within five years after certification of the district;or (4) used to reimburse a party for payment of eligible costs(including interest) incurred within five years from certification of the district. Beginning with the sixth year following certification of the TIF District, at least 75% of the tax increments must be used to pay outstanding bonds or make contractual payments obligated within the first five years. When outstanding bonds have been defeased and sufficient money has been set aside to pay for such contractual obligations,the TIF District must be decertified. The City anticipates that tax increments will be spent outside of the TIF District (including a portion for allowable administrative expenses)for eligible redevelopment pooling expenditures. Section T Limitation on Administrative Expenses Administrative expenses are defined as all costs of the City other than: (1) amounts paid for the purchase of land; SPRINGSTED Page 9 Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Golden Valley, Minnesota (2) amounts paid for materials and services, including architectural and engineering services directly connected with the physical development of the real property in the project; (3) relocation benefits paid to, or services provided for, persons residing or businesses located in the project; (4) amounts used to pay principal or interest on,fund a reserve for, or sell at a discount bonds issued pursuant to section 469.178;or (5) amounts used to pay other financial obligations to the extent those obligations were used to finance costs described in clause(1)to(3). Administrative expenses include amounts paid for services provided by bond counsel,fiscal consultants, planning or economic development consultants, and actual costs incurred by the County in administering the TIF District, Tax increments may be used to pay administrative expenses of the TIF District up to the lesser of(a) 10%of the total tax increment expenditures authorized by the TIF Plan or(b) 10%of the total tax increments received by the TIF District. Section U Limitation on Property Not Subject to Improvements-Four Year Rule If after four years from certification of the TIF District no demolition, rehabilitation, renovation, or qualified improvement of an adjacent street has commenced on a parcel located within the TIF District, then that parcel shall be excluded from the TIF District and the original net tax capacity shall be adjusted accordingly. Qualified improvements of a street are limited to construction or opening of a new street, relocation of a street, or substantial reconstruction or rebuilding of an existing street. The City must submit to the County Auditor, by February 1 of the fifth year,evidence that the required activity has taken place for each parcel in the TIF District, If a parcel is excluded from the TIF District and the City or owner of the parcel subsequently commences any of the above activities, the City shall certify to the County Auditor that such activity has commenced and the parcel shall once again be included in the TIF District. The County Auditor shall certify the net tax capacity of the parcel,as most recently certified by the Commissioner of Revenue, and add such amount to the original net tax capacity of the TIF District. Section V Estimated Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions Exhibit IV shows the estimated impact on other taxing jurisdictions if the maximum projected retained captured net tax capacity of the TIF District was hypothetically available to the other taxing jurisdictions. The City believes that there will be no adverse impact on other taxing jurisdictions during the life of the TIF District, since the proposed development would not have occurred without the establishment of the TIF District and the provision of public assistance. A positive impact on other taxing jurisdictions will occur when the TIF District is decertified and the development therein becomes part of the general tax base. The fiscal and economic implications of the proposed tax increment financing district, as pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, Subdivision 2,are listed below. 1. The total amount of tax increment that will be generated over the life of the TIF District is estimated to be $19,052,584 2. To the extent the project in the TIF District generates any public cost impacts on City-provided services such as police and fire protection, public infrastructure, and the impact of any general obligation tax increment bonds attributable to the TIF District upon the ability to issue other debt for general fund purposes, such costs will be levied upon the taxable net tax capacity of the City, excluding that portion captured by the TIF District. SPRINGSTED Page 10 Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Golden Valley, Minnesota 3. The amount of tax increments over the life of the TIF District that would be attributable to School District levies, assuming the School District's share of the total local tax rate for all taxing jurisdictions remained the same, is estimated to be$4,387,293. 4. The amount of tax increments over the life of the TIF District that would be attributable to County levies, assuming the County's share of the total local tax rate for all taxing jurisdictions remained the same is estimated to be$6,126,576 5. No additional information has been requested by the County or School District that would enable it to determine additional costs that will accrue to it due to the development proposed for the district. Section W Prior Planned Improvements The City shall accompany its request for certification to the County Auditor(or notice of district enlargement), with a listing of all properties within the TIF District for which building permits have been issued during the 18 months immediately preceding approval of the TIF Plan. The County Auditor shall increase the original net tax capacity of the TIF District by the net tax capacity of each improvement for which a building permit was issued. There have been no building permits issued in the last 18 months in conjunction with any of the properties within the TIF District. Section X Development Agreements If within a project containing a redevelopment district, more than 25% of the acreage of the property to be acquired by the City is purchased with tax increment bonds proceeds (to which tax increment from the property is pledged), then prior to such acquisition, the City must enter into an agreement for the development of the property, Such agreement must provide recourse for the City should the development not be completed, The City anticipates entering into an agreement for development, and may acquire property for the purposes of undertaking public infrastructure and utility improvements within the TIF District. Section Y Assessment Agreements The City may, upon entering into a development agreement, also enter into an assessment agreement with the developer, which establishes a minimum market value of the land and improvements for each year during the life of the TIF District. The assessment agreement shall be presented to the County or City Assessor who shall review the plans and specifications for the improvements to be constructed, review the market value previously assigned to the land, and so long as the minimum market value contained in the assessment agreement appears to be an accurate estimate, shall certify the assessment agreement as reasonable. The assessment agreement shall be filed for record in the office of the County Recorder of each county where the property is located, Any modification or premature termination of this agreement must first be approved by the City, County and School District. The City does anticipate entering into an assessment agreements. SPRINGSTED Page 11 Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Golden Valley, Minnesota Section Z Modifications of the Tax Increment Financing Plan Any reduction or enlargement in the geographic area of the Development District or the TIF District; a determination to capitalize interest on the debt if that determination was not part of the original TIF Plan, increase in the portion of the captured net tax capacity to be retained by the City; increase in the total estimated public costs; or designation of property to be acquired by the City shall be approved only after satisfying all the necessary requirements for approval of the original TIF Plan. This paragraph does not apply if: (1) the only modification is elimination of parcels from the TIF District;and (2) the current net tax capacity of the parcels eliminated equals or exceeds the net tax capacity of those parcels in the TIF District's original net tax capacity, or the City agrees that the TIF District's original net tax capacity will be reduced by no more than the current net tax capacity of the parcels eliminated, The City must notify the County Auditor of any modification that reduces or enlarges the geographic area of the TIF District, The geographic area of the TIF District may be reduced but not enlarged after five years following the date of certification. Section AA Administration of the Tax Increment Financing Plan Upon adoption of the TIF Plan, the City shall submit a copy of such plan to the Minnesota Department of Revenue and the Office of the State Auditor, The City shall also request that the County Auditor certify the original net tax capacity and net tax capacity rate of the TIF District. To assist the County Auditor in this process, the City shall submit copies of the TIF Plan, the resolution establishing the TIF District and adopting the TIF Plan, and a listing of any prior planned improvements. The City shall also send the County Assessor any assessment agreement establishing the minimum market value of land and improvements in the TIF District, and shall request that the County Assessor review and certify this assessment agreement as reasonable. The County shall distribute to the City the amount of tax increment as it becomes available, The amount of tax increment in any year represents the applicable property taxes generated by the retained captured net tax capacity of the TIF District. The amount of tax increment may change due to development anticipated by the TIF Plan, other development, inflation of property values, or changes in property classification rates or formulas. In administering and implementing the TIF Plan,the following actions should occur on an annual basis: (1) prior to July 1,the City shall notify the County Assessor of any new development that has occurred in the TIF District during the past year to insure that the new value will be recorded in a timely manner. (2) if the County Auditor receives the request for certification of a new TIF District, or for modification of an existing TIF District, before July 1, the request shall be recognized in determining local tax rates for the current and subsequent levy years. Requests received on or after July 1 shall be used to determine local tax rates in subsequent years. (3) each year the County Auditor shall certify the amount of the original net tax capacity of the TIF District. The amount certified shall reflect any changes that occur as a result of the following: (a) the value of property that changes from tax-exempt to taxable shall be added to the original net tax capacity of the TIF District, The reverse shall also apply; (b) the original net tax capacity may be modified by any approved enlargement or reduction of the TIF District; SPRINGSTED Page 12 Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Golden Valley, Minnesota (c) if laws governing the classification of real property cause changes to the percentage of estimated market value to be applied for property tax purposes, then the resulting increase or decrease in net tax capacity shall be applied proportionately to the original net tax capacity and the retained captured net tax capacity of the TIF District. The County Auditor shall notify the City of all changes made to the original net tax capacity of the TIF District. Section AB Filing TIF Plan,Financial Reporting and Disclosure Requirements The City will file the TIF Plan,and any subsequent amendments thereto,with the Commissioner of Revenue and the Office of the State Auditor pursuant to Minnesota Statutes,Section 469.175,subdivision 4A, The City will comply with all reporting requirements for the TIF District under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175,subdivisions 5 and 6. SPRINGSTED Page 13 Exhibit 1 MAP OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING (REDEVELOPMENT) DISTRICT Within Winnetka&Medicine Lake Road Redevelopment Project Area Project Area TiF District C Bt Evike Rd rs �� I aws yrs ass+ �ro bias 'woo �w vdi r i -4m 2-30 _sab t .y 10 �Ol aN •.l' amr 1'dA :33- -3v a3as i ve N mea zza: ' > :-w i _1 ,w G` t° . "20 :1m .y \ SrSi i —{ c i Tr00 noo r+a i 70M rem �s.o �sro -66C sera Win netKa_Heights �++ �sowaa. ^s1 serr L—. " :c_ _o=o 2"1 :o t cele 1ttSr sate Dors 1=_ --Cal 310e0 .ca _.__ :,�, 11� o Joao sao+ aa00 rooc Prat COE'1/Jbi e tel. Tax Increment Financing : cello g� ldef1 *f (Redevelopment) District - ,Q Valley within Winnettaa and Medicine Lake Rd Redevelopment Project Area .. SPRINGSTED Page 14 Exhibit 11 JE-Assumptions Re ort City of Golden Valley,Minnesota Tax Increment Financing(Redevelopment)District TIF Projections at$34.881 M -Full Term Liberty Crossing Project Type of Tax Increment Financing District Redevelopment Maximum Duration of TIF District 25 years from 1st increment Projected Certification Request Date 09/01/15 Decertification Date 12/31/43 (26 Years of Increment) 2015/2016 Base Estimated Market Value $4,103,000 Original Net Tax Capacity $51,288 Assessment/Collection Year 2016/2017 2017/2018 2018/2019 2019/2020 Base Estimated Market Value $4,103,000 $4,103,000 $4,103,000 $4,103,000 Estimated Increase in Value-New Construction 0 23,801,800 31,336,096 32,044,878 Total Estimated Market Value 4,103,000 27,904,800 35,439,096 36,147,878 Total Net Tax Capacity $51,288 $348,810 $442,989 $451,848 City of Golden Valley 54.626% Hennepin County 46.398% ISD#281 33.226% Other 10.561% Local Tax Capacity Rate 144.811% 2014/2015 Fiscal Disparities Contribution From TIF District 0.000011/0 Administrative Retainage Percent(maximum = 10%) 10.000/0 Pooling Percent 0.00% Present Value Date& Rate 09101/15 5.00% PV Amount $7,913,693 Notes Projections assume no future changes to classification rates and current tax rates remain constant. Projections are based on 247 Units with total value of$34.881 M and a 2%market value inflator. Value assumption is reflective of building and land value combined. Projections assume commencment of construction in 2016,with project completion in 2017, with the first receipt of partial TIF in 2018. County Admin expenses assume 2%annual inflation in cost estimate. SPRINGSTED Page 15 O oo u) r m W M h N r r V' N N 00 N N N M OD OD O p M m y M CO W M N u) m O (`') r N r M M (V A N o C M S N M u) 0 V' r O (n (`M V' r N O O N () N 7 — C OD u) M m O (D _ > n O O 0) 0) 0) 0) O M V' uD M O N V r'O M u) M M r� u) M 1-4 pp N O W r (D o o V M N O m m OD I- (D (D (n V M M N N CL C d' O o M V V' M Cl) M M Cl) Cl) M CO N N N N N N N N N N (V (V N O> O ul (D � a W 00 CO N u) V N ^ OD u) r OD M M O M V' O r V' V' u) V' O m Cl) u) V' I� O I� O D1 V (O (O M m (n O u) O CO r� r� N M M O M V m I u) Il_N c0 c0 O) V �- V' 0) OD O V' N N (D V V' 00 (D I� V' (D _ C u) n W O N p r 0) N u) m M r u) O (o r M 0) u) M O OD u) r N (pr mO M r m O N Cl u) u) 00 O N Mu) O C aN- M (Oh (n ( (A (n (n (n (D (O (D (O (0 (D r� Ir I� I� f� I� c0 OD O7 OD QS O h tO OOu) m 00 rMrNrM '- Mm mu) OD N u) o OD p N M 8(p Cl) N u) O m r u) u) m N r r O m N OD co(D N (D O V' OD M ccM m V' �- r — m ( u) M N N .- .- m y .E N oo N(p n OD O M V� o (l 2 O M u)u) OD O M u)n M M u) o L') E Coo V' (n u) u) u) (O u) (O u) OM r r r r r Oo OD m m w ODrn m m Ooi oo oD u) N O W CD aD OD m M O O (D V O r (n M M V M N O r o Mo OD r V� r n^ u) m N O a 0000 (V M v v_V V (n N (O(D u) f� o Oo 00 m O O O M N L`C N (N N N(V N q C E C O fVA J U Cl (N� Vp O O R T (Oi o M r- n N N m W fO m(m)_N V o Y.r- � r OMirn oIQ (n em O� ui (go (o � ( (� � (000 N � 'nOOr° aoow coo aroawm a, ((pp a (» oo N W u) M N N M u) co M co u) N W O (D M Ori (O M O n r (�) C u) y 00 V OD M CD M 0o M m O u) 0 o N N Cl) CO V' V' (D u) r r m m O O N M M co 'y, °o �- N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M CO-M M M M M YJ OD (o J O oo u) (p (p M (p m c0 in OD O Cl) IT O r O u) m O u) O u) r aD — (() O a r u) O r f� O (D OD (D N r o Cl) C n CF) (Np o .- (VV m V— ((o (V M r M M (n �- M m W (Np O V' M N V' C w E r V (D (MA M (O (ND (D (D (D (�D (O n n (nn n {� � Co� co OD rm 00 m m M 44S U m Ni 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M M OD OD W. OD OD m 00 00 CO. W CD OD CD. OD OD 00 CO CD OD CD CO CO OD M 00 OD X O O L (n N OD N W In (n (rpp � r� (n a I� N O) ( (Op O Orp> r N (Np (0 p_«D Cl N M V' V' V V' V V' V' V' V V' (n u) u) (tDpp (D (n (n ((cpD 0 (D (D 7F- N mmoo .- NM u) ra0m NM (n W ONM �v 0 � oDWWCoCoO0WWODCOCDMMOD WOOD W00MCDODCDOD00 OD CD W OD OD CO OD CO CD 00 OD CD 00 OD CO 00 oo oo W CD Fo oo Co04 ao x NOD N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 5 6 ) O Z m S U r c t E W m O co OD W 00 M M W oo oc O o O m r Oo M O O u) N m m u) u) N u) N 0 CL (p N N CO m 00 (OppD (D O 00 OD O O O 00 (cp0 O VN� (pNp� N (D M N V' OD (n d? F @ M (n u) C V V V 7 V (on o (N N M In (Mf) In (00 (ND (D (� ((D (rD o fm0 r ig w O LL U C (� W E C C W O O O W m N r N M N ma o 0 M O u) r VO ((pn co N V M A O O O r cc N N r 40 (n O c 0 A N M M N N I� O (MD ((VVI co (n W V O O CO O m W N V c0 M M (MM n O m r O coM coM O o oo u)CO O M OD M V C M 0 p N 0 0 M V r O (p N O N u) O V) u) N N ((pp W W O C M N r O () u) (D ( cD r r m O '^ m N d ~ V' V' N-u)u) to n co () m O N co u)V) r co 0) o N M o r' V x R C m N M M M M co M M ,t V' V' V' V V' V' V' V' V u) (n In u) o u) N >LL NC C � c zd Cy Ow V C p = O 7— zz 7- .- N N N N N N N N N N c` M M M (Q c` (` (\ M M V C V O C V ('o .�U (0 M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M ho � � � � aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ,p^� ,O a y a LLI �a ,a CL u - pn � v -fl � t a W 00I N F' N N .b NO N ( i �, �9 •� Io ° _ � � Y -m X ro : u? Cl? N f�• a � v C C'O Ln U a C N L o ° a ui N IpOw, p d V 3 K f U r00 M M 44 ; v � u L° N U1 U x to v R m • C a U- U 0; y = iY N N tx m in ; c v OC :9 a g~� C c$ c$ `c� F S 5 0 ami `" d N c0Z {„) t .c ° 0 CII W ( ° v gi d 0D c 13) + ° o a° o �} y I � C o u� - r M 0 u C5 U N �f'i I ' 9� LL x O 6a lx0 fp C] � c C � � � F_ •U � N V � , t9 F 1-- cam] '�O 4� C _ U N 0 N O r O N ` r E � LL a m v F 0 ° v ro U x v L E v u F _ U :3 .� ° Q�7 0 U Ip ~ Q H C N r Z GLLI 4� U Q Ln m � � air g vro .so LO a f° a.SQ x C cu Fe n g' C 4C4 y U y pry� O H C C ° 6 �h .0 .. .p O ~N h+M Exhibit V Market Value Analysis Report City of Golden Valley,Minnesota Tax Increment Financing(Redevelopment) District TIF Projections at$34.881M -Full Term Liberty Crossing Project Assumptions Present Value Date 09/01/15 P.V. Rate-Gross T.I. 5.00% Increase in EMV With TIF District $52,898,562 Less: P_V of Gross Tax Increment 8,954,046 Subtotal $43,944,516 Less: Increase in EMV Without TIF 0 Difference $43,944,516 Annual Present Gross Tax Value Year Increment 5.00% 1 2018 430,845 370,670 2 2019 567,226 464,765 3 2020 580,056 452,645 4 2021 593,143 440,816 5 2022 r 606,491 429,273 6 2023 620,106 418,009 7 2024 633,994 407,020 8 2025 r 648,159 396,299 9 2026 662,608 385,841 10 2027 677,345 375,641 11 2028 692,378 365,693 12 2029 707,711 355,992 13 2030 723,350 346,532 14 2031 739,303 337,309 15 2032 755,574 328,317 16 2033 112,111 319,551 17 2034 789,100 311,007 18 2035 806,367 302,678 19 2036 823,980 294,561 20 2037 841,945 286,651 21 2038 860,269 278,942 22 2039 878,960 271,431 23 2040 898,025 264,113 24 2041 917,470 256,983 25 2042 937,305 250,037 26 2043 957,537 243,270 $19,121,418 $8,954,046 SPRINGSTED Page 18 Exhibit VI PART 1 - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PURPOSE OF EVALUATION LHB was hired by the City of Golden Valley to inspect and evaluate the properties within a Tax Increment Financing Redevelopment District ("TIF District") proposed to be established by the City. The proposed TIF District is bounded by Medicine Lake Road,Rhode Island Avenue North, and Winnetka Avenue North (Diagram 1).The purpose of LHB's work is to determine whether the proposed TIF District meets the statutory requirements for coverage,and whether four (4) buildings on four(4) parcels,located within the proposed TIF District,meet the qualifications required for a Redevelopment District. Medicine Lake • . . . D 23rd Avenue North Diagram 1—Proposed TIF District SCOPE OF WORK The proposed TIF District consists of four (4) parcels with four (4) structures. Four (4) buildings were inspected on March 11,2015. Building Code,Condition Deficiency and Context Analysis SPRINGSTED Page 19 Exhibit VI Reports for the buildings that were inspected are located in Appendix B. CONCLUSION After inspecting and evaluating the properties within the proposed TIF District and applying current statutory criteria for a Redevelopment District under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10, it is our professional opinion that the proposed TIF District qualifies as a Redevelopment District because: •The proposed TIF District has a coverage calculation of 100 percent which is above the 70 percent requirement. • 100 percent of the buildings are structurally substandard which is above the 50 percent requirement. •The substandard buildings are reasonably distributed. SPRINGSTED Page 20 city 0ON golden11 MEMORANDUM VC e Physical Development Department 763-593-8030/763-593-3988(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting September 1, 2015 Agenda Item 4. B. Public Hearing-Adopting Modification to Redevelopment Plan for Highway 55 West Redevelopment Project Area, establishing Tax Increment Financing District, Cornerstone Creek, and adopting the Tax Increment Financing Plan Prepared By Marc Nevinski, Physical Development Director Summary The City Council is asked to hold a public hearing and consider approval of a modification to the Highway 55 West Redevelopment Project Area, and establish Tax Increment Financing District (Housing), Cornerstone Creek, and adopt the tax increment financing plan. The district is located along Golden Valley Road in the existing Highway 55 West Redevelopment Area. CDHC Cornerstone Creek LLC is proposing to construct a 45 unit affordable, permanent, and supportive housing project to serve developmentally disabled adults. The project will be located on parcels currently addressed as 9300 and 9310 Golden Valley Road. Assistance with the project in the form of a tax increment financing district (housing) has been requested to help develop the project and maintain rents at an affordable rates. The Cornerstone Creek Housing TIF District will be a 25 year district. The rental units must be occupied by residents earning less than 50% of the county median income, the income limits will apply for the duration of the district, and 80%or more of the project must be used for residential purposes. The City Council approved Resolution 14-46 on May 20, 2014, expressing its intent to create and administer a tax increment financing district for the project. On July 14, 2015, staff informed the HRA of the project and the intent to begin the establishment of a TIF district. On July 31, 2015, the County and School district received the required impact letters. Public hearing notices were published in the SunPost on August 20, 2015. On August 24, 2015, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution 15-02 finding that the development was in conformance with the City's Comprehensive plan. The project received final PUD approval from the City Council on August 18, 2015. Attachments • Resolution Adopting a Modification to the Redevelopment Plan for Highway 55 West Redevelopment Project Area; and Establishing Tax Increment Financing District (Housing), Cornerstone Creek, Within Highway 55 West Redevelopment Project Area and Adopting a Tax Increment Financing Plan Therefor (3 pages) • Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing (Housing) District within Highway 55 West Redevelopment Project Area, Cornerstone Creek (19 pages) • Redevelopment Plan for Highway 55 West Redevelopment Area (11 pages) Recommended Action Motion to adopt Resolution Approving Tax Increment Financing District (Housing), Cornerstone Creek and the Tax Increment Financing Plan therefor. Resolution 15-72 September 1, 2015 Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION ADOPTING A MODIFICATION TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR HIGHWAY 55 WEST-REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA; AND ESTABLISHING TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT (HOUSING), CORNERSTONE CREEK, WITHIN HIGHWAY 55 WEST REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA AND ADOPTING A TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN THEREFOR, Be It Resolved, the City Council (the "Council") of the City of Golden Valley, Minnesota (the "City"), as follows: Section 1. Recitals 1.01 The City and its Housing and Redevelopment Authority (the "Authority") have previously adopted a redevelopment plan (the "Project Plan") and redevelopment project under Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 to 469.047, designated as the Highway 55 West Redevelopment Project Area (the "Project Area"). It has been proposed by the Authority that the City adopt a Modification to the Project Plan for Highway 55 West Redevelopment Project Area (the "Project Plan Modification") and establish Tax Increment Financing District (Housing), Cornerstone Creek, within Highway 55 West Redevelopment Project Area (the "District") and adopt a TIF Plan (the "TIF Plan") therefor (the Project Plan Modification and the TIF Plan are referred to collectively herein as the "Plans"); all pursuant to and in conformity with applicable law, including Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 to 469.047 and Sections 469.174 to 469.1794, all inclusive, as amended (the "Act"), all as reflected in the Plans, and presented for the Council's consideration. 1.02. The Authority and the City have investigated the facts relating to the Plans and have caused the Plans to be prepared. 1.03. The Authority and the City have performed all actions required by law to be performed prior to the establishment of the District and the adoption and approval of the proposed Plans, including, but not limited to, notification of Hennepin County and Independent School District No. 270 having taxing jurisdiction over the property to be included in the District, a review of and written comment on the Plans by the City Planning Commission, approval of the Plans by the Authority on September 1, 2015, and the holding of a public hearing upon published notice as required by law. 1.04 Certain written reports (the "Reports") relating to the Plans and to the activities contemplated therein have heretofore been prepared by staff and consultants and submitted to the Council and/or made a part of the City files and proceedings on the Plans. The Reports include data, information and/or substantiation constituting or relating to the basis for the other findings and determinations made in this resolution. The Council hereby confirms, ratifies and adopts the Reports, which are hereby incorporated into and made as fully a part of this resolution to the same extent as if set forth in full herein. 1.05 The City is not modifying the boundaries of the Project Area, but is modifying the Project Plan therefor. Resolution 15-72 - continued September 1, 2015 Section 2. Findings for the Adoption and Approval of the Project Plan Modification 2.01. The Council approves the Project Plan Modification, and specifically finds that: (a) the land within the Project Area would not be available for redevelopment without the financial aid to be sought under this Project Plan; (b) the Project Plan, as modified, will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the needs of the City as a whole, for the development of the Project by private enterprise; and (c) that the Project Plan, as modified, conforms to the general plan for the development of the City as a whole. Section 3. Findings for the Establishment of Tax Increment Financing District (Housing), Cornerstone Creek 3.01. The Council hereby finds that the District is in the public interest and is a "housing district" under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subd. 11 of the Act. 3.02. The Council further finds that (i) the proposed development would not occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future, (ii) the Plans conform to the general plan for the development or redevelopment of the City as a whole, and (iii) the Plans will afford maximum opportunity consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for the development or redevelopment of the District by private enterprise. 3.03. The Council further finds, declares and determines that the City made the above findings stated in this Section and has set forth the reasons and supporting facts for each determination in writing, in Sections E and Section J of the TIF Plan for the District. Section 4. Public Purpose 4.01. The adoption of the Plans conforms in all respects to the requirements of the Act and will help fulfill a need to develop an area of the City which is already built up, to provide employment opportunities, to improve the tax base and to improve the general economy of the State and thereby serves a public purpose. For the reasons described in, Section 3 above, the City believes these benefits directly derive from the tax increment assistance provided under the TIF Plan. A private developer will receive only the assistance needed to make this development financially feasible. As such, any private benefits received by a developer are incidental and do not outweigh the primary public benefits. Section 5. Approval and Adoption of the Plans 5.01. The Plans, as presented to the Council on this date, including without limitation the findings and statements of objectives contained therein, are hereby approved, ratified, established, and adopted and shall be placed on file in the office of the City Manager. 5.02. The staff of the City, the City's advisors and legal counsel are authorized and directed to proceed with the implementation of the Plans and to negotiate, draft, prepare and present to this Council for its consideration all further plans, resolutions, documents and contracts necessary for this purpose. Resolution 15-72 - continued September 1, 2015 5.03. The Auditor of Hennepin County is requested to certify the original net tax capacity of the District, as described in the Plans, and to certify in each year thereafter the amount by which the original net tax capacity has increased or decreased; and the Authority is authorized and directed to forthwith transmit this request to the County Auditor in such form and content as the Auditor may specify, together with a list of all properties within the District, for which building permits have been issued during the 18 months immediately preceding the adoption of this resolution. 5.04. The City Manager is further authorized and directed to file a copy of the Plans with the Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Revenue and the Office of the State Auditor pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 469.175, Subd. 4a. Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by the City Clerk. City of Golden Valley, Minnesota Golden Valley Housing and Redevelopment Authority Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing (Housing) District Within Highway 55 West Redevelopment Project Area (Cornerstone Creek Project) Draft: July 31, 2015 Public Hearing: September 1, 2015 Prepared by: SPRINGSTED INCORPORATED 380 Jackson Street, Suite 300 St. Paul, MN 55101-2887 (651)223.3000 www.springsted.com TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Pae Us A. Definitions.................................................................................................................... 1 B. Statutory Authorization................................................................................................. 1 C. Statement of Need and Public Purpose....................................................................... 1 D. Statement of Objectives............................................................................................... 1 E. Designation of Tax Increment Financing District as a Housing District........................ 1 F. Duration of the TIF District and the Three Year Rule................................................... 2 G. Property to be Included in the TIF District.................................................................... 2 H. Property to be Acquired in the TIF District................................................................... 3 I. Specific Development Expected to Occur Within the TIF District................................. 3 J. Findings and Need for Tax Increment Financing......................................................... 4 K. Estimated Public Costs................................................................................................ 4 L. Estimated Sources of Revenue.................................................................................... 5 M. Estimated Amount of Bonded Indebtedness................................................................ 5 N. Original Net Tax Capacity............................................................................................ 5 0. Original Tax Capacity Rate.......................................................................................... 6 P. Projected Retained Captured Net Tax Capacity and Projected Tax Increment........... 6 Q. Use of Tax Increment................................................................................................... 6 R. Excess Tax Increment.................................................................................................. 7 S. Tax Increment Pooling and the Five Year Rule............................................................ 7 T. Limitation on Administrative Expenses......................................................................... 8 U. Limitation on Property Not Subject to Improvements-Four Year Rule........................ 8 V. Estimated Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions.......................................................... 8 W. Prior Planned Improvements........................................................................................ 9 X. Development Agreements............................................................................................ 9 Y. Assessment Agreements............................................................................................. 9 Z. Modifications of the Tax Increment Financing Plan...................................................... 10 AA. Administration of the Tax Increment Financing Plan.................................................... 10 AB, Financial Reporting and Disclosure Requirements...................................................... 11 Map of the Tax Increment Financing District....................................................................................... EXHIBIT AssumptionsReport ........................................................................................................................... EXHIBIT II Projected Tax Increment Report......................................................................................................... EXHIBIT III Estimated Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions Report..................................................................... EXHIBIT IV Market Value Analysis Report............................................................................................................. EXHIBIT V Projected Pay-As-You Go Report....................................................................................................... EXHIBIT VI Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Golden Valley, Minnesota Section A Definitions The terms defined in this section have the meanings given herein, unless the context in which they are used indicates a different meaning: "Authority"means the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Golden Valley. :qy means the City of Golden Valley, Minnesota; also referred to as a"Municipality". "City Council"means the City Council of the Golden Valley; also referred to as the'Governing Body". "County" means Hennepin County, Minnesota. "Redevelopment Project Area" means the Highway 55 West Redevelopment Project Area in the City, which is described in the corresponding Redevelopment Plan. "Redevelopment Plan"means the Redevelopment Plan for the Highway 55 West Project Area. "Project Area"means the geographic area of the Redevelopment Project Area. "School District" means Independent School District No.270,Minnesota. "State" means the State of Minnesota. "TIF Act" means Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 through 469.1799,both inclusive. "TIF District" means the Tax Increment Financing(Housing)District the Cornerstone Creek Project. "TIF Plan" means the tax increment financing plan for the TIF District(this document). Section B Statutory Authorization See"Statutory Authorization"on page 4 of the Redevelopment Plan for the Project Area. Section C Statement of Need and Public Purpose See"Statement of Need and Public Purpose"on page 4 of the Redevelopment Plan for the Project Area. Section D Statement of Objectives See "Statement of Objectives"on pages 4-5 of the of the Redevelopment Plan for the Project Area, Section E Designation of Tax Increment Financing District as a Housing District Pursuant to the TIF Act,the Authority seeks to create the Cornerstone Creek TIF District and adopt a TIF Plan for the TIF District, The Authority will review the TIF Plan prior to City adoption. The proposed TIF District is a housing district under Minnesota Statutes,Section 469.174, Subd. 11 of the TIF Act. Housing districts are a type of tax increment financing district that consist of a project intended for occupancy, in part, by persons or families of low and moderate income. Low and moderate income is defined in federal, state, and municipal legislation. A project does not qualify if more than 20% of the square footage of buildings that receive assistance from tax increments consist of commercial, retail or other nonresidential use. SPRINGSTED Page 1 Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Golden Valley, Minnesota In addition, housing districts are subject to various income limitations and requirements for residential property. For owner occupied residential property,95%of the housing units must be initially purchased and occupied by individuals whose family income is less than or equal to the income requirements for qualified mortgage bond projects under section 143(f) of the Internal Revenue Code. For residential rental property, the property must satisfy the income requirements for a qualified residential rental project as defined in section 142(d)of the Internal Revenue Code. The TIF District meets the above qualifications for these reasons: 1, The planned improvements consist of the following: a. Approximately 45 total units,for which the following will apply: o 45-unit service enriched affordable housing rental units for adults with developmental disabilities will be occupied by persons with incomes no greater than 50%of county median income 2. At least 80%of the proposed development will be used for residential purposes. 3. The Authority will require in the development agreement that the income limitations for the rental units in the apartment building will apply for the duration of the TIF District. Tax increments derived from a housing district must be used solely to finance the cost of housing projects as defined in section 469,174, subd. II and 469,176 of the TIF Act. The cost of public improvements directly related to the housing projects and the allocated administrative expenses of the Authority may be included in the cost of a housing project. The Authority anticipates using tax increment revenues to finance a portion of the extraordinary costs associated with providing the affordable housing units. Section F Duration of the TIF District and the Three Year Rule Housing districts may remain in existence 25 years from the date of receipt of the first tax increment. Modifications of this plan(see Section Z)shall not extend these limitations. The Authority reserves the right to allow the TIF District to remain in existence for the maximum duration allowed by law(projected to be through the year 2043), and anticipates the TIF District may be active for the maximum duration allowed (see Section P). All tax increments from taxes payable in the year the TIF District is decertified shall be paid to the Authority. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, subd, 1(b),the Authority specifies 2018 as the first year in which it elects to receive tax increment from the TIF District,which is no later than four years following the year of approval of the TIF District. Thus,the Authority may collect increment from the district through December 31, 2043(see Section P). Section G Property to be Included in the TIF District The TIF District will consist of approximately 2.24 acres of land located within the Project Area. A map showing the approximate location of the TIF District is shown in Exhibit I. The TIF District will encompass an area that is a portion of two existing parcels for which the PID numbers are provided below, additionally a legal description describing the new parcel that will comprise the TIF District is described below: SPRINGSTED Page 2 Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Golden Valley, Minnesota Parcel Number Legal Description* 31.118.21.32.0004 That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, Section 31, Township 118, Range 21 described as follows: Beginning at a point of the North line of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 31 distant 484 feet East from the Northwest corner of said Southwest Quarter;thence East along said North line a distance of 101 feet;thence South parallel with the West line of said Southwest Quarter to the center line of 6th Avenue North (old County Road No. 6)as described in County Commissioners Proceedings dated April 27, 1925;thence Westerly along said center line to a line drawn South, parallel with the West line of said Southwest Quarter,from the point of beginning;thence North along the 31,118.21.32.0005 last described parallel line to the point of beginning.The West line of the above described tract of land is marked by Judicial Landmarks set pursuant to Torrens Case No, 12495. That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, Section 31,Township 118, Range 21 described as follows: Beginning at a point of the South line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter distant 585 feet East from the Southwest corner of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter;thence North, parallel with the West line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter to the North line of the South 16.50 feet of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter;thence West along said North line to a point 836 feet West, measured along said North line,from the East line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter;thence South, parallel with said East line to said South line;thence East along said South line 110.75 feet, more or less,to a point of beginning. *These properties are in the process of being replatted. The legal description identified reflects the boundaries of the portions of 31.118.21.32.0004 and 31.118.21.32.0005 that will be included in the TIF District following the replatting of the property. A new parcel number for the yet to be created parcel is not yet available. The area encompassed by the TIF District shall also include all street or utility right-of-ways located upon or adjacent to the property described above. Section H Property to be Acquired in the TIF District The Authority may acquire and sell any or all of the property located within the TIF District; however, the Authority does not anticipate acquiring any such property at this time, Section I Specific Development Expected to Occur Within the TIF District The proposed development within the TIF District is expected to consist of approximately 45-unit service enriched affordable housing rental units for adults with developmental disabilities. The Authority anticipates using tax increment to finance eligible costs associated with development of the project as well as related administrative expenses.At least 20%(28 units)of the units will be occupied by residents with incomes at or below 50%of the area median income in order to comply with the statutory requirements of a Housing TIF District.The Authority anticipates using a portion of the increment to finance other eligible affordable housing projects within the City, as well as any related administrative costs of the district and projects. The Authority anticipates that construction will commence on the project in 2015 and be fully constructed by the end of 2016 and be 100% assessed and on the tax rolls as of January 2, 2017 for taxes payable in 2018. SPRINGSTED Page 3 Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Golden Valley, Minnesota At the time this document was prepared there were no signed construction contracts with regards to the above described development. The Authority intends to enter into a development agreement with a developer for the housing development described in this section. In addition,the Authority may use Tax Increment from the TIF District in the future to provide financial assistance for the development of affordable housing within the Project which meets the income requirements set forth in Section 469,1761 of the Tax Increment Act. Section J Findings and Need for Tax Increment Financing In establishing the TIF District,the Authority makes the following findings: (1) The TIF District qualifies as a housing district; See Section E of this document for the reasons and facts supporting this finding. (2) The proposed development, in the opinion of the Authority, would not reasonably be expected to occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future. The proposed development is expected to consist of approximately 45-units of service enriched affordable housing project for adults with developmental disabilities.The Authority's finding that the proposed development would be unlikely to occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future is based on an analysis of the project pro forma and other material submitted to the Authority by the developer. These documents have indicated that the reduction in annual revenues due to the lower rents associated with providing affordable housing units will result in returns that are below market,thereby making this housing development infeasible without public assistance. Therefore, the developer has indicated in the TIF application and in communications with the Authority that the development as proposed would not move forward without tax increment assistance. (3) The TIF Plan conforms to the general plan for development or redevelopment of the City as a whole;and The reasons and facts supporting this finding are that the Planning Commission of the City has found the TIF plan consistent with the general plan for development of the city as a whole and will generally complement and serve to implement policies adopted in the City's comprehensive plan. (4) The TIF Plan will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole,for the development of the Project Area by private enterprise. The reasons and facts supporting this finding are that the development activities are necessary so that development and redevelopment by private enterprise can occur within the Project Area. Section K Estimated Public Costs The estimated public costs of the TIF District are listed below. Such costs are eligible for reimbursement from tax increments of the TIF District. Land/Building acquisition $687,975 Bond/Note Interest 676,170 Administrative expenses 151,571 County Administrative expenses 20,000 Total $1,535,716 The Authority reserves the right to administratively adjust the amount of any of the items listed above or to incorporate additional eligible items, so long as the total estimated public cost ($1,535,716) is not increased. The SPRINGSTED Page 4 Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Golden Valley, Minnesota Authority also reserves the right to fund any of the identified costs with any other legally available revenues, but anticipates that such costs will be primarily financed with tax increments. Section L Estimated Sources of Revenue Tax Increment revenue Net of OSA Reduction $1,535,716 Interest on invested funds 0 Other 0 Total $1,535,716 The Authority anticipates providing financial assistance to the proposed development through the use of a pay-as- you-go note. As tax increments are collected from the TIF District in future years, a portion of these taxes will be distributed to the developer/owner as reimbursement for public costs incurred (see Section K). The Authority reserves the right to finance any or all public costs of the TIF District using pay-as-you-go assistance, internal funding, general obligation or revenue debt, or any other financing mechanism authorized by law. The Authority also reserves the right to use other sources of revenue legally applicable to the Project Area to pay for such costs including, but not limited to, special assessments, utility revenues, federal or state funds, and investment income, Section M Estimated Amount of Bonded Indebtedness The maximum principal amount of bonds(as defined in the TIF Act)secured in whole or part with tax increment from the TIF District is $1,535,716. The Authority currently plans to finance the improvements and affordable housing costs in the form of one or more pay-as-you go revenue notes, but reserves the right to issue bonds in any form, including without limitation any interfund loan with interest not to exceed the maximum permitted under Section 469.178, subd. 7 of the TIF Act. Section N Original Net Tax Capacity The County Auditor shall certify the original net tax capacity of the TIF District. This value will be equal to the total net tax capacity of all property in the TIF District as certified by the State Commissioner of Revenue. For districts certified between January 1 and June 30, inclusive, this value is based on the previous assessment year. For districts certified between July 1 and December 31, inclusive,this value is based on the current assessment year. The Estimated Market Value of all property within the TIF District as of January 2015, for taxes payable in 2016, is estimated to be$410,980. Upon establishment of the TIF District, and subsequent classification of property as rental property, it is estimated that the original net tax capacity of the TIF District will be approximately$3,082. Each year the County Auditor shall certify the amount that the original net tax capacity has increased or decreased as a result of: (1) changes in the tax-exempt status of property; (2) reductions or enlargements of the geographic area of the TIF District; (3) changes due to stipulation agreements or abatements; or (4) changes in property classification rates, SPRINGSTED Page 5 Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Golden Valley, Minnesota Section 0 Original Tax Capacity Rate The County Auditor shall also certify the original tax capacity rate of the TIF District. This rate shall be the sum of all local tax rates that apply to property in the TIF District. This rate shall be for the same taxes payable year as the original net tax capacity. In future years,the amount of tax increment generated by the TIF District will be calculated using the lesser of(a)the sum of the current local tax rates at that time or(b)the original tax capacity rate of the TIF District. At the time this document was prepared,the sum of all local tax rates that apply to the property in the TIF District,for taxes levied in 2015 and payable in 2016, was not yet available. Then this total becomes available, the County Auditor shall certify this amount as the original tax capacity rate of the TIF District. For purposes of estimating tax increment generated by the TIF District, the final local tax rates for taxes levied in 2014 and payable in 2015, is 141.925%as shown below. 201412015 Taxing Jurisdiction Local Tax Rate City of Golden Valley 54.626% Hennepin County 46.398% ISD#270 30.340% Other 10.561% Total 141.925% Section P Projected Retained Captured Net Tax Capacity and Projected Tax Increment Each year the County Auditor shall determine the current net tax capacity of all property in the TIF District. To the extent that this total exceeds the original net tax capacity, the difference shall be known as the captured net tax capacity of the TIF District. The County Auditor shall certify to the Authority the amount of captured net tax capacity each year. The Authority may choose to retain any or all of this amount. It is the Authority's intention to retain 100% of the captured net tax capacity of the TIF District. Such amount shall be known as the retained captured net tax capacity of the TIF District. Exhibit II gives a listing of the various information and assumptions used in preparing a number of the exhibits contained in this TIF Plan, including Exhibit III which shows the projected tax increment generated over the anticipated life of the TIF District. Section Q Use of Tax Increment Each year the County Treasurer shall deduct 0.36% of the annual tax increment generated by the TIF District and pay such amount to the State's General Fund, Such amounts will be appropriated to the State Auditor for the cost of financial reporting and auditing of tax increment financing information throughout the state. Exhibit III shows the projected deduction for this purpose over the anticipated life of the TIF District, The Authority has determined that it will use 100% of the remaining tax increment generated by the TIF District for any of the following purposes: (1) Pay for the estimated public costs of the TIF District (see Section K) and County administrative costs associated with the TIF District(see Section T); (2) pay principal and interest on one or more pay-as-you-go notes,tax increment bonds or other bonds issued to finance the estimated public costs of the TIF District; SPRINGSTED Page 6 Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Golden Valley, Minnesota (3) accumulate a reserve securing the payment of tax increment bonds or other bonds issued to finance the estimated public costs of the TIF District; (4) pay all or a portion of the county road costs as may be required by the County Board under M.S, Section 469,175,Subdivision 1a;or (5) return excess tax increments to the County Auditor for redistribution to the City, County and School District. Tax increments from property located in one county must be expended for the direct and primary benefit of a project located within that county, unless the county board involved waives this requirement. Tax increments shall not be used to circumvent levy limitations applicable to the City. Tax increment derived from the TIF District must be used solely to finance the cost of housing projects (including administrative expenses and public improvement costs) as defined in Section 469,174, Subdivision 11 of the Tax Increment Act and subject to the requirements set forth in Section 469.1761 of the Tax Increment Act. Tax increment shall not be used to finance the acquisition, construction, renovation, operation, or maintenance of a building to be used primarily and regularly for conducting the business of a municipality,county, school district,or any other local unit of government or the State or federal government. Further, tax increments may not be used to finance: a commons area used as a public park; facilities used for social or recreational purposes (whether public or private); or publicly-owned facilities used for conference purposes; provided that tax increment may be used for a privately owned conference facility, and for parking structures whether public or privately owned and whether or not they are ancillary to one of the otherwise prohibited uses described above, If there exists any type of agreement or arrangement providing for the developer, or other beneficiary of assistance, to repay all or a portion of the assistance that was paid or financed with tax increments, such payments shall be subject to all of the restrictions imposed on the use of tax increments. Assistance includes sale of property at less than the cost of acquisition or fair market value, grants, ground or other leases at less then fair market rent, interest rate subsidies, utility service connections, roads, or other similar assistance that would otherwise be paid for by the developer or beneficiary. Section R Excess Tax Increment Beginning with the sixth year after certification of the TIF District, any year in which the tax increments from the TIF District exceed the amount necessary to pay the estimated public costs authorized by the TIF Plan, the Authority shall use the excess tax increments to: (1) prepay any outstanding tax increment bonds; (2) discharge the pledge of tax increments thereof; (3) pay amounts into an escrow account dedicated to the payment of the tax increment bonds;or (4) return excess tax increments to the County Auditor for redistribution to the City, County and School District. The County Auditor must report to the Commissioner of Education the amount of any excess tax increment redistributed to the School District within 30 days of such redistribution. Section S Tax Increment Pooling and the Five Year Rule As permitted under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.1763,subdivision 2(b)and subdivision 3(a)(5), any expenditures of increment from the TIF District to pay the cost of a "housing project" as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469,174, subd, 11 will be treated as an expenditure within the district for the purposes of the "pooling rules" and the SPRINGSTED Page 7 Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Golden Valley, Minnesota "five year rule". The Authority does not currently anticipate that tax increments will be spent outside the TIF District (except allowable administrative expenses), but such expenditures are expressly authorized in this TIF Plan. Section T Limitation on Administrative Expenses Administrative expenses are defined as all costs of the Authority other than: (1) amounts paid for the purchase of land; (2) amounts paid for materials and services, including architectural and engineering services directly connected with the proposed development within the TIF District; (3) relocation benefits paid to, or services provided for, persons or businesses residing or located within the TIF District;or (4) amounts used to pay interest on,fund a reserve for,or sell at a discount,tax increment bonds. Administrative expenses include amounts paid for services provided by bond counsel, fiscal consultants, planning or economic development consultants, and actual costs incurred by the County in administering the TIF District. Tax increments may be used to pay administrative expenses of the TIF District up to the lesser of(a) 10%of the total tax increment expenditures authorized by the TIF Plan or(b) 10%of the total tax increments received by the District. Section U Limitation on Property Not Subject to Improvements-Four Year Rule If after four years from certification of the TIF District no demolition, rehabilitation, renovation, or qualified improvement of an adjacent street has commenced on a parcel located within the TIF District, then that parcel shall be excluded from the TIF District and the original net tax capacity shall be adjusted accordingly. Qualified improvements of a street are limited to construction or opening of a new street, relocation of a street, or substantial reconstruction or rebuilding of an existing street. The Authority must submit to the County Auditor, by.February 1 of the fifth year,evidence that the required activity has taken place for each parcel in the TIF District. If a parcel is excluded from the TIF District and the Authority or owner of the parcel subsequently commences any of the above activities,the Authority shall certify to the County Auditor that such activity has commenced and the parcel shall once again be included in the TIF District. The County Auditor shall certify the net tax capacity of the parcel, as most recently certified by the Commissioner of Revenue, and add such amount to the original net tax capacity of the TIF District. Section V Estimated Impact on other Taxing Jurisdictions Exhibit IV shows the estimated impact on other taxing jurisdictions if the maximum projected retained captured net tax capacity of the TIF District was hypothetically available to the other taxing jurisdictions. The Authority believes that there will be no adverse impact on other taxing jurisdictions during the life of the TIF District, since the proposed development would not have occurred without the establishment of the TIF District and the provision of public assistance. A positive impact on other taxing jurisdictions will occur when the TIF District is decertified and the development therein becomes part of the general tax base. The fiscal and economic implications of the proposed tax increment financing district, as pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469,175, Subdivision 2,are listed below, 1. The total amount of tax increment that will be generated over the life of the district is estimated to be $1,541,254. SPRINGSTED Page 8 Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Golden Valley, Minnesota 2. To the extent the proposed project in the Cornerstone Creek TIF District generates any public cost impacts on City provided services such as police and fire protection, public infrastructure, and borrowing costs attributable to the district, such costs will be levied upon the taxable net tax capacity of the City, excluding that portion captured by the District. The City does not anticipate issuing general obligation tax increment bonds attributable to the District, but reserves the right to finance certain project costs with this method. 3. The amount of tax increments over the life of the district that would be attributable to school district levies, assuming the school district's share of the total local tax rate for all taxing jurisdictions remained the same, is estimated to be$329,480. 4. The amount of tax increments over the life of the district that would be attributable to county levies, assuming the county's share of the total local tax rate for all taxing jurisdictions remained the same is estimated to be$503,863. 5. No additional information has been requested by the county or school district that would enable it to determine additional costs that will accrue to it due to the development proposed for the district. Section W Prior Planned Improvements The Authority shall accompany its request for certification to the County Auditor (or notice of district enlargement), with a listing of all properties within the TIF District for which building permits have been issued during the 18 months immediately preceding approval of the TIF Plan. The County Auditor shall increase the original net tax capacity of the TIF District by the net tax capacity of each improvement for which a building permit was issued. There have been no building permits issued in the last 18 months in conjunction with any of the properties within the TIF District, Section X Development Agreements If within a project containing a housing district, more than 10% of the acreage of the property to be acquired by the Authority is purchased with tax increment bonds proceeds(to which tax increment from the property is pledged),then prior to such acquisition, the Authority must enter into an agreement for the development of the property. Such agreement must provide recourse for the Authority should the development not be completed. The Authority anticipates entering into an agreement for development, but does not anticipate acquiring any property located within the TIF District. Section Y Assessment Agreements The Authority may, upon entering into a development agreement, also enter into an assessment agreement with any person, which establishes a minimum market value of the land and improvements for each year during the life of the TIF District. The assessment agreement shall be presented to the County or City Assessor who shall review the plans and specifications for the improvements to be constructed, review the market value previously assigned to the land, and so long as the minimum market value contained in the assessment agreement appears to be an accurate estimate, shall certify the assessment agreement as reasonable. The assessment agreement shall be filed for record in the office of the County Recorder of each county where the property is located. Any modification or premature termination of this agreement must first be approved by the Authority,County and School District. The Authority anticipates entering into an assessment agreement. SPRINGSTED Page 9 Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Golden Valley, Minnesota Section Z Modifications of the Tax Increment Financing Plan Any reduction or enlargement in the geographic area of the Project Area or the TIF District; increase in the amount of bonded indebtedness to be incurred; increase in the amount of capitalized interest; increase in that portion of the captured net tax capacity to be retained by the Authority; increase in the total estimated capital and administrative costs; or designation of additional property to be acquired by the Authority shall be approved only after satisfying all the necessary requirements for approval of the original TIF Plan. This paragraph does not apply if: (1) the only modification is elimination of parcels from the TIF District;and (2) the current net tax capacity of the parcels eliminated equals or exceeds the net tax capacity of those parcels in the TIF District's original net tax capacity, or the Authority agrees that the TIF District's original net tax capacity will be reduced by no more than the current net tax capacity of the parcels eliminated. The Authority must notify the County Auditor of any modification that reduces or enlarges the geographic area of the TIF District. The geographic area of the TIF District may be reduced but not enlarged after five years following the date of certification. Section AA Filing and Administration of the Tax Increment Financing Plan Upon adoption of the TIF Plan, the Authority shall submit a copy of such plan to the Minnesota Department of Revenue and the Office of the State Auditor. The Authority shall also request that the County Auditor certify the original net tax capacity and net tax capacity rate of the TIF District. To assist the County Auditor in this process,the Authority shall submit copies of the TIF Plan, the resolution establishing the TIF District and adopting the TIF Plan, and a listing of any prior planned improvements. The Authority shall also send the County Assessor any assessment agreement establishing the minimum market value of land and improvements in the TIF District, and shall request that the County Assessor review and certify this assessment agreement as reasonable. The County shall distribute to the Authority the amount of tax increment as it becomes available. The amount of tax increment in any year represents the applicable property taxes generated by the retained captured net tax capacity of the TIF District. The amount of tax increment may change due to development anticipated by the TIF Plan, other development, inflation of property values, or changes in property classification rates or formulas. In administering and implementing the TIF Plan,the following actions should occur on an annual basis: (1) prior to July 1, the Authority shall notify the County Assessor of any new development that has occurred in the TIF District during the past year to ensure that the new value will be recorded in a timely manner. (2) if the County Auditor receives the request for certification of a new TIF District, or for modification of an existing TIF District, before July 1, the request shall be recognized in determining local tax rates for the current and subsequent levy years. Requests received on or after July 1 shall be used to determine local tax rates in subsequent years. (3) each year the County Auditor shall certify the amount of the original net tax capacity of the TIF District, The amount certified shall reflect any changes that occur as a result of the following: (a) the value of property that changes from tax-exempt to taxable shall be added to the original net tax capacity of the TIF District, The reverse shall also apply; (b) the original net tax capacity may be modified by any approved enlargement or reduction of the TIF District; SPRINGSTED Page 10 Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Golden Valley, Minnesota (c) if the TIF District is classified as an economic development district, then the original net tax capacity shall be increased by the amount of the annual adjustment factor; and (d) if laws governing the classification of real property cause changes to the percentage of estimated market value to be applied for property tax purposes, then the resulting increase or decrease in net tax capacity shall be applied proportionately to the original net tax capacity and the retained captured net tax capacity of the TIF District. The County Auditor shall notify the Authority of all changes made to the original net tax capacity of the TIF District. Section AB Financial Reporting and Disclosure Requirements The Authority will comply with all reporting requirements for the TIF District under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175,subdivisions 5 and 6. SPRINGSTED Page 11 Exhibit 1 MAP OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING(Housing)DISTRICT Within Highway 55 West Redevelopment Project Area t wo 820 8W 630 II a j _ azo Q Project Area Its TIF District 710 839 741 Z- 10' -_ 708 6%690 681 680 6 (( .. 750 640 7q5 101 610 670 f4 730 ( � 730 . 1 Lr.01 664 l .. .. 66. 201 112 ae a1 ,+ vo,v 659 202 e, ,0;10,,, too,��,� ,� pati 209206-10504 i t ,Ave i 9140 9140 8845 '. 8900 � 605 0 600 9000 i 0 9326 9400 ( 31t0 40M 9210 & p 9ff0 a1 ...coo _ 901 �� Golden Valle - y,fRd �- *950. W 325 I� 9100, 0 8950 .. M`"tiinreiJiY 77-77 9130 93LI0 9130 ,.,,, .•�wN � is ��.,wa ...✓ L��Rd t 439 `q'.4 4 �x .exyj ' 89 61� asss �' i v� a-.x:d ..�.� + s �./ w.,..,- �913t 9011 , 433 ,. 123 t L. 4,118817 _ ( 4 Z: rcas t *mmrastt ��' .a^"` 9441 ' 111 �, i�' 424 , ? - 416 a ,{` 9 9147 347 410 8925 a92069121415 )f- -; sob ` 345 i_lJS Willy st �. ,�92174 9143 339 �` }� 1 } 4Q0 I !UJ 9 W -.. 3aarcvs: P W Date:7/2&2015... .Gill Tax Increment Financing (Housing) District t 051 " °`f� e C&y d add-VaBsy Ear a8 ait—iaysrs.. 0; (, within Highway 55 west Redevelopment Project Area r.. SPRINGSTED Page 12 Exhibit 11 Assumptions Report City of Golden Valley,Minnesota Tax Increment Financing(Housing)District cornerstone Creek Tax Credit Housing Project-4d Classification TIF Projections-$5.88M EMV Type of Tax Increment Financing District Housing Maximum Duration of TIF District 25 years from 1st increment Projected Certification Request Date 09101/15 Decertification Date 12/31/43 (26 Years of Increment) 20192016 Base Estimated Market Value $410,980 Original Net Tax Capacity $3,082 AssessmentCollection Year 2016/2017 201712018 2018/2019 2019/2020 Base Estimated Market Value $410,980 $410,980 $410,980 $410,980 Estimated Increase in Value-New Construction ` 0 ' 5,569,020 ` 5,569,020 ` 5,569,020 Total Estimated Market Value ` 410,960 ` 5,980,000 ` 5,980,000 r 5,980,000 Total Net Tax Capacity $3,082 $44,850 $44,850 $44,850 City of Golden Valet' 54.626% Hennepin County 46.398% ISD#270 30.340% other 10.561% Local Tax Capac4 Rate 141.925% 20 1 4120 1 5 Rscal Disparities Contribution From TF District 0.0000% Administrative Retainage Percent(maximum= 10%) 10.00% Pooling Percent 0.00% Bonds Nate(Pay-As Yau-Go) Bonds Dated NA Note Dated 09130/15 Bond Rate NA Nate Rate 5.00% Band Amount NA Note Amount $687,975 Present Value Date 8 Rate 09101/15 5.00%PV Amount $769,785 Notes Projections assume no future changes to classification rates and current tax rates remain constant Prajections are based on a market value of$5.96M. Preliminary value assumptions provided by Hennepin County Assessors office. Value assumption used is reflective of combined bulling and land value_ Base value assumptions is based on current value,and a 0%MV inflator is assumed. Projections assume commencment of construction in 2015,with project completion in 2016, but a delay of first receipt to 2018 to coincide with full value. Projections are based on units at 4D rental class rate. County Admin expenses assume 2%annual inflation in cost estimate: SPRINGSTED Page 13 O O ( CO t to Ln � 1Mr)_IQ Ll V 10 S S M M M N ^ N N CV N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C Z 7 N LO U) U) LO U) U1 0 U) W) U) LO U) � U) U) U) LO U) LO U) U) U) U) U) U) W W 6, co 00 r- O LO i N i O 00 n (0 Cl) O 00 n LO Cl) N O 00 n LO Cl) : m N a O M CO M M Cl) Cl) N N N N N N pp n OR 00 00 00 0 0 0 0 CO 00 0 00 00 00 0 0 0 0 00 00LQ w E c ui Ui 0 U)U)o� U)rri 0 U)U)U)U)U) Ui Ui Ui Ui Ui Ui Ui Ui o U)LO � $ yo E» LO cl) 00 to S W 0 CO(s IS 8 t00 co r- n M ^ (^00 r- W 00 W 00 t2 04 00 m O S 0) r- 2 S N 0 0 0 O N C C m O E C O NfA ► C6 C6 C o)C6 c3i C6 ci a)C6 o)o)d o)d o)of m a)o)d o)m m a)0) U) aEim LO 0 U) U) 0 W) LO LO LO LO Ln nUnLnu) LOLOLOU) U) W) V) V) 0 V) V) Cm 00 M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M 16 p N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 0 � � Q O cc m 0) m 0) � 0) C) 0) 0) w 0) � C) m a) ^ 0) m w M a) C3) N P,m m m 0 lxV C N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N � F- (u 0) 0)0) 0)m 0 m m m m m mm 0 m O)0)0)0) m 0) 0) m 0) mm y E 0000LO00Ln00Lo000LOLo000LOU) U) 0Lo00 O V o 0 a 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U) U) N U) V) W) U) U) U) U) U) U) to U) U) U) U) LO U) U) U) U) U) N U) In U) LO N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N (N Vj U m m 0) (3) m m m M m 01 D) m 0? CD 0 m m 01 0? m m 0) M NE F- CMLvvvvv : v 1 v vvvvvzZ v : v m - .- - - - .- .- .- .- .- .- - O O Co Co w Co co 00 00 0 m 0 00 00 wo ao 00 0 0 0) 0 0) m m mom 0 0) 0 0 0 nn �nn �r- r�n ��rn ��r� �nnNnnn � F- aja v v v v v v v a v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v n �= TUU H N rp ► U oNo N N aN00N0 aN0 ONO aN0 N N aN0 ONO N W ONO 0N0 N N W N ONO N W N N W ONO W C C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ct 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ci 0 Ct 0 Ct 0 0 0 Ct 0 0 0 y c 0. M M M M M M M M fM M M M M M(M M M M M M M M fM M fM M M f•7 � o ` N C O � O0SC0W0W � WcqW � WococSoc � WCoc arn00 W CQ 00 00 00 00 00 W r' M � 44444444444444 C O F CL M 0 w+ = v C 0) O O N 5 rn U W 1:1coo CD S S S S S S S S S o 0 S SOS 0 0 8 0 0 § S 0b S S ` a c X2 m m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 rtfao _o o_ 0 0 0 0 0 o 000 0 0 0o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C F- 0) 0 Y N 00 00 00 00 CO 00 CO CO 00 00 00 W a0 CO CO 00 CO 00 CO CO 00 CO 00 00 00 CO 0 f� ; V' m m m m m m m m m m m m 0) m m m m m m m m m m m m m jp C N i 2 u) L0 u) rn u) rn u) u) rn u) u)u0 u) rr) u) rn u') U) u) r0 U) Lo rn W) u) V) W A "E- �• �p d 0) 0) O O n 00 0) 0 N M V 0 (0 r- 00 m 0 N M M M M M M M � V N m � E o '= z 1 N N N Q f`V N N N Q N M M M M (D G — .� M M M M o � � o � .- aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa z oC a a w •- .- .- .- .- .- .- .- .- •- .- .- .- .- .- CG CL U.- UF- LO x W � z m a. g 4 g LLI r - 3 x n I A !An IM n L� s ~ � A a Exhibit V Market Value Analysis Report City of Golden Valley, Minnesota ` Tax Increment Financing(Housing)District Cornerstone Creek Tax Credit Housing Project-4d Classifiaation TIF Projections-$5.98M EMV Assumptions Present Value Date 09/01/15 P.V.Rate-Gross T.I. 5.00% Increase in EMV With TIF District $5,569,020 Less:P.V of Gross Tax Increment 769,785 Subtotal $4,799,235 Less:Increase in EMV Without TF 0 Difference $4,799,235 Annual Present Gross Tax Value Year Increment 5.00% 1 2018 59,279 51,000 2 2019 ` 59,279 48,571 3 2020 ` 59,279 46,258 4 2021 59,279 44,055 5 2022 ` 59,279 41,958 6 2023 ` 59,279 39,960 7 2024 ` 59,279 38,057 8 2025 ` 59,279 36,244 9 2026 ` 59,279 34,519 10 2027 ` 59,279 32,875 11 2028 ` 59,279 31,309 12 2029 ` 59,279 29,818 13 2030 ` 59,279 28,399 14 2031 59,279 27,046 15 2032 ` 59,279 25,758 16 2033 ` 59,279 24,532 17 2034 ` 59,279 23,364 18 2035 ` 59,279 22,251 19 2036 ` 59,279 21,191 20 2037 ` 59,279 20,182 21 2038 ` 59,279 19,221 22 2039 ` 59,279 18,306 23 2040 ` 59,279 17,434 24 2041 59,279 16,604 25 2042 59,279 15,813 26 2043 59,279 15,060 $1,541,254 $769,785 SPRINGSTED Exhibit VI Pro�ecbed Pa -As-You-Go Note Report Clty of Caklen Valey,Mnesota Tax Increment FkrmKkrg piouskrg)Dkttrkt Cornerstone Creek Tax Credt H oudag Project-4d CbsdIwNon 71F Projecdons-15ABM EW Nob Date: 09130115 Nob Rale: 5.00% Arnoalt $66/,975 Cmuklm Unpdd San6oarwal Loan trletest Accaued Net Bdmxe Dale PrtK�al Yaaest P31 Due rWect R- we oubtmxbv {1) Q) r (3) (4) {5) (6) p) (7) 667,975.00 MKM7 0.00 0.00 0.00 45,96055 45,960.55 0.00 687,975.00 MOV17 0.00 0.00 0.00 63,159.93 63,199.93 0.00 687,975.00 02K m8 0.00 0.00 0.00 80,359.31 80,389.31 0.00 687,975.00 084ma 0.00 26,31250 26,31250 97,55829 71,246.19 26,312.50 687,975.00 02WH9 0.00 2651250 25,31250 88,44557 62,133007 26,312.50 687,975.00 08001/19 0.00 26,307.00 26,307.00 79,332.45 53,025.45 26,307.00 687,975.00 02101120 0.00 26,307.00 26,3W.00 70224.83 43,917.83 26,307.00 687.975.00 08101120 0.00 26,301.50 26,30150 61.11721 34.815.71 26,301.50 687.975.00 020121 0000 26,301.50 26,30150 52,015.09 25,71359 26,301.50 687.975.00 0810121 0.00 26296.00 26,295.00 42,91237 16,616.97 2629&00 687.975.00 02W22 0.00 26296.00 25296.00 33,816.35 7,520.35 26,296.00 687.975.00 0810122 1,570.77 24.719.73 2529050 24,719.73 0.00 26,290.50 686,404.23 020123 9,130.39 17,160.11 2529050 17,160.11 0.00 26290.50 677,273.84 0810123 9,35225 16,931.85 26284.50 16,931.85 0.00 26284.50 667,921.19 0200124 9,586.47 16,69&03 26284.50 16,698.03 0.00 26284.50 658,334.72 08101124 9,820.13 16,45&37 2627850 16,456.37 0.00 26278.50 648,514.59 X00125 10,065.64 16212.86 2627850 16212.86 0.00 25278.50 638,448.96 0810125 10,311.78 15,961.22 26273.00 15,96122 0.00 257MOD 628,137.17 020126 10.56957 15,703.43 25273.00 15,703.43 0.00 26273000 617,567.60 OHMS 10,827.31 15,439.19 2626650 15,439.19 0.00 26266.50 606,740.29 00011Z7 11,097.99 15,165.51 2626650 15,16851 0.00 26266.50 595,64230 0810127 11,368.94 14,891.06 26260.00 14,891.06 0.00 26260.00 584,273.36 02001128 11,653.17 14,606.83 26260.00 14,606.83 0.00 262&O.OD 572,670.19 0800128 11,93650 14515.50 26254.00 14,31550 0.00 26254.OD 56D,681.69 07,0129 12,236.96 14,017.04 25254.00 14,017.04 0.00 26254.00 548,444.73 08101129 12,535,88 13,711.12 25247.00 13,711.12 0.00 26247.00 535,90&85 OM/3D 12,84928 13,397.72 26247.00 13,397.72 0.00 25247.00 523,059.57 08101/30 13616451 13,07&49 26241.00 13,076.49 0.00 26241.00 509,895.06 02101/31 13,48322 12,747.38 25241.00 12,747.38 0.00 25241.00 496,401.44 08101/31 136821.96 12,410.04 25234.00 12,410.04 0.00 26234.00 482,577.48 0201132 14,16956 12.064.44 26,234.00 12,064.44 0.00 26234.0D 4686407.92 08001132 14,516.80 11,710.20 26227.00 11,71020 0.00 2522.7.00 453,891.12 (001133 14,879.72 11,347.28 75227.00 11,34728 0.00 26227.00 439,011.40 08001133 15,244.71 10„975.29 26220.00 10,97529 0.00 26220.00 423,76&69 02101/34 15,625.83 10,594.17 26220.00 10,594.17 0.00 26220.00 408,140.86 08001134 16,009008 10203.52 25213.00 1020352 0.00 25213.00 392131.38 0201/351 16,409.72 9,803.28 26213000 9,60328 0.00 26213.00 375,721.66 OMM 16,812.46 9,393.04 2520550 9,393.04 ODO 26206.50 358,909.20 0MMS 17,212.77 8,977-73 2620550 8,972.73 0000 25208.50 341,676.43 MOMS 17,656.09 8,541.91 25,198.00 8,541.91 0.00 26,191LOD 324,020.34 02001137 18,097.49 8,10D.51 26,198.00 8,10051 0.00 26,195.00 305692285 08101137 18,542.43 7,648.07 26,19050 7,648.07 0.00 26,190.50 287,380.42 0mW1d8 19,006.99 7,184.51 26,19050 7,18451 0.00 26,190.50 268,374.43 08001/38 19,473.14 6,709.36 26,18250 6,709.36 0.00 MAMBO 248,901.29 0201139 19,959.97 622253 26,18250 6222.53 0.00 26.18250 228,941.32 08101/39 20,45027 5,723.53 26,17450 5,72353 0.00 25,174.50 208,49D.35 02101/40 20,96224 521226 26,17450 521226 0.00 25,174.50 187,5 11 OMMO 21,478.30 4,688.20 26,166.50 4,68820 0.00 26,16&50 166,049.81 0201141 22,01525 4,151.25 26,16650 4,15125 0.00 26,166.50 144,034.56 08001/41 22,557.14 3,600.86 25,158.00 3600,86 0.00 26,15&00 121,477.42 02101/42 23,121.06 3.036.94 25,156.00 3,036.94 0000 26,15&00 98,35&36 08101/42 23,691.09 2,45&91 26,150.00 2,45891 0.00 26,150.00 74,665.27 OZOV43 24,283.37 1,86&63 26.150000 1,86623 0.00 26.150.00 50.381.9D OOKW43 24,881.45 1259.55 26,141.00 1,25955 0.00 26,141.00 25,500.45 OZ01144 25,50D.45 637.51 25,13796 63751 0.00 26,137.96 0.00 $687,975 $6/6,166L96 $1,364,14196 $1,18D,63531 $504,46895 $1,364,141.96 9apVs Tax YKremerd &04 Tod Net Revalue $1,364,146.00 SPRINGSTED Redevelopment Plan for Highway 55 West Redevelopment Area Golden Valley, Minnesota Golden Valley Housing and Redevelopment Authority Approval: October 9,2012 Planning Commission Review: Approved by the City Council: f TABLE OF CONTENTS Pa s Introduction.........................................................................................................................3 Background..........................................................................................................................3 PublicImprovements...........................................................................................................3 Statement of Need and Public Purpose,Statutory Authorization......................................4 Statementof Objectives......................................................................................................4 ItemizedGoals and Objectives............................................................................................5 Policies ................................................................................................................................6 Boundaries of the Project Area and Redevelopment Opportunities..................................7 Definitions............................................................................................................................8 Administration of Redevelopment Project..........................................................................9 Maintenanceand Operations..............................................................................................9 Paymentof Public Costs..................................................................................................9 Property Acquisition and Proposed Reuse.....................................................................9 Relocation .....................................................................................................................10 Environmental Controls; Land Use Regulations............................................................10 Parkand Open Space to be Created.............................................................................10 Amendments.................................................................................................................10 Mapof the Project Area....................................................................................................11 - H - Introduction In the 1970s the City took the initiative to create a mixed-use,walkable downtown centered at the historic village crossroads at Golden Valley Road and Winnetka Avenue.This area has many community resources, Including retail destinations,restaurants,the library,the post office,and City Hall. Recently interest has grown in connecting the area west of Boone Avenue to this urban core. The goal is to make better and safer connections for both pedestrians and vehicles and provide better access to transit stops. It is anticipated that public improvements that improve vehicle and pedestrian safety will promote private redevelopment in the area. Recent rezoning of two parcels at 9220 and 9130 Olson Memorial Highway to high-density housing is the immediate impetus to establish a new Highway 55 West Renewal and Renovation Area (Project Area).A developer has proposed the construction of a 142-unit apartment building,adding many new residents to the area and spurring the need to create improved transportation linkages. This Plan will define the geographic area of proposed Improvements,outline existing conditions, Identify possible improvements, and set goals and objectives and policies that will guide projects as they are implemented.The proposed Renewal and Renovation Area includes parcels on the north and south side of Golden Valley Road west of Decatur Avenue North to 9400 Golden Valley Road and parcels on the south side of 7a'Avenue North between Boone Avenue North and Decatur Avenue North(See Map,page 11). Background The Project Area has a wide range of land uses and building types,including 24 parcels and 21 buildings,from 12 to 86 years old. When parcels in the Project Area were originally developed, Golden Valley Road served as the primary east-west arterial roadway in the area,which originally contained farmsteads. In fact,a farmhouse built in 1926 still exists on the north side of Golden Valley Road.Commercial Uses,which included a bowling alley,restaurants and office uses developed over time.Single and multifamily housing now coexist with the commercial uses. When Olson Memorial Highway(Highway 55)was constructed in the 1960s,some of the existing uses ended up with frontage on both Highway 55 and Golden Valley Road and the local street system was truncated.The unusual shaped lots,highway orientation and truncated local street system create a challenge for development. The Valley Square Redevelopment Area east of the Project Area has been redeveloped with a mix of uses,but has a more urban pedestrian orientation that helps integrate the uses.The goal of the Project Area is to develop public Improvements that will support the current range of land uses and encourage new development, including new high-density residential housing now proposed for the area. Public Improvements Public Improvements proposed in the area include Improvements to the Highway 55 access/exit to Decatur Avenue North,sidewalks and lighting to improve pedestrian safety, burial of overhead electrical lines,addition of regional storm water facilities, and sanitary sewer lining.These improvements are aimed to assist residents from the proposed 142-unit apartment move safely in 3 the area and to foster further development in the area by creating a safe neighborhood environment. Pedestrian safety will also support walking programs promoted by existing local businesses and connect residents and employees of businesses west of Boone Avenue to transit stops on Wisconsin Avenue or Winnetka Avenue. Statement of Need and Public Purpose,Statutory Authorization The Housing and Redevelopment Authority(HRA)finds there is a need for development within the City and the Project Area in order to provide employment and housing opportunities,to improve the local tax base,and to improve the general economy of the City and the State.The economic security of the people in the City depends upon proper development of property that meets any one of a number of conditions, including properties with values too low to pay for the public services required or rendered and properties where lack of use or improper use has resulted in stagnant or unproductive land that could otherwise contribute to the public health,safety,and welfare. The HRA finds that in many cases,such property cannot be developed without public participation and assistance in various forms,including property acquisition and/or write-down; proper planning; the financing of development costs associated with clearance,grading,and soils correction;and the making of various other public and private improvements necessary for development. In cases where the development of property cannot be done by private enterprise alone,the HRA believes it to be in the public interest to consider the exercise of its powers,to advance and spend public money, and to provide the means and impetus for such development. The HRA finds that in certain cases, property within the Project Area would or may not be available for development without the specific financial aid to be sought,that the Redevelopment Plan will afford maximum opportunity,consistent with the needs of the City as a whole,for the development of the Project Area by private enterprise,and that the Redevelopment Plan conforms to the general plan for the development of the City as a whole. Overall Objectives The HRA seeks to achieve one or more of the following objectives with respect to the Project Area, as the Authority may deem appropriate and necessary: • promote and secure the prompt development of property within the Project Area,such property which is not now in Its most productive use, in a manner consistent with the Comprehensive Plan of the City,thus realizing Comprehensive Plan, land use,and tax base goals • assist development in the Project Area through the acquisition or write-down of certain interests in property which is not now in productive use or in Its highest and best use,to make or defray the cost of soil corrections or site improvements on said property,and to construct or reimburse for the construction of public improvements and other facilities on or for the benefit of said property,thereby promoting and securing the development of other land within the Project Area 4 • secure the increase and availability of rental housing property for individuals and families of low to moderate income within the Project Area • secure the increase of industrial and commercial property subject to taxation within the Project Area • promote and secure additional employment opportunities within the City and to prevent the loss of existing employment opportunities,thereby preventing the loss of valuable human resources • To provide funding for an ongoing development strategy and to prioritize the use of available resources • implement and revise from time to time,as may be deemed necessary or desirable,a consolidated and unified Redevelopment Plan and to finance the associated development costs on an area-wide basis • employ any of the powers of the Authority for the benefit of the Project Area in such cases and upon such terms as the Authority may deem appropriate • construct or acquire facilities deemed desirable for the development of the Project Area Itemized Goals and Objectives To achieve its mission of structured redevelopment,this Plan has identified six goals with related objectives to encourage cohesive planning and structured renewal within the area. It then outlines policies that will help to achieve the goals and objectives. Goal 1—Improve vehicle and pedestrian access Objectives • Improved access/exit from Highway 55 to Decatur Avenue North • Added pedestrian and non-motorized transportation facilities • Improved connections to the Luce Line Regional Trail Goal 2—Redevelop obsolete properties Objectives • Blighted,functionally obsolete,and/or economically unsustainable buildings removed • New uses compatible with existing uses • Maximized development density along Highway 55 Goal 3--Create jobs and Itfe-cycle housing Objectives • Increased high-paying jobs • Housing stock that is maintained or improved • Higher density housing 5 • Affordable,zero crime, housing • Commercial uses that serve the community Goal 4--Require design that is sustainable and aesthetically pleasing Objectives • Enhanced community identity through features that reflect Golden Valley • Visually attractive development that complements its surroundings • Buildings constructed with environmentally sustainable'green building'practices (development that meets environmental criteria set forth by Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design(LEED)and the United States Department of Energy) • Active living criteria included in design • Undergrounded utilities • Signage and wayfinding features to connect the area to downtown Golden Valley and the Luce Line Trail Goal 5—Protect the environment Objectives • Wetlands that are protected and enhanced • Land free of soil and wetland contamination • Arborous environments • Natural features retained and native vegetation (re)established Goal 6—Maintain a regional framework Objectives • Growth compatible with the Metropolitan Council development framework • Public infrastructure designed in cooperation with Hennepin County and the Minnesota Department of Transportation • Participation in grant programs available through Hennepin County,the Metropolitan Council and other agencies • A positive relationship with surrounding communities and governmental agencies • Continued participation in cooperative traffic management strategies • Improved transit options Policies Land Use The City will study planned land uses to determine the need or desirability of individual parcel or area-wide comprehensive plan or zoning amendments to accommodate desired land uses. The City and HRA will assure that its review processes,zoning,and building regulations will promote desired development projects. The City will assure that new uses In the redevelopment area are compatible with existing development and the City's Land Use Plan. 6 The City and HRA will review existing properties in the area to consider their long term viability and/or options for alternative uses. Land use plans will promote mixed use developments and increased density where appropriate, in keeping with the Metropolitan Council's regional growth strategy. Financing The City and HRA will identify criteria to target redevelopment funds such as tax increment financing,tax abatements, livable Communities,Community Development Block Grants and other funding made available by the legislature or other agencies or governmental units. The City and HRA will consider providing public assistance to redevelopment projects that serve a substantial public purpose,remove blight,or mitigate contamination. The City and HRA will consider using land write-downs to subsidize redevelopment projects. Redevelopment funding will be paired with other funding options such as assessments, based on the Golden Valley Special Assessment Policy. The City will consider franchise fees and utility surcharges to underwrite the cost of utility and infrastructure upgrades. Design and Environmental Standards The City will promote best practices to meet the highest environmental standards. The City and HRA will Identify approaches and/or incentives to promote a corridor beautification program.This program will include both public and private components. The City will monitor ongoing research on sustainable development initiatives to guide redevelopment and future updates of this plan. Transportation The City will work with Metropolitan Transit to monitor transportation needs of area residents and workers and identify ways to improve transportation services,including improving transit routes and working with area businesses to develop transportation management pians. Boundaries of the Project Area and Redevelopment Opportunities The property within the City which constitutes the Project Area includes the property contained within the boundaries described below and is illustrated on the attached map. Area lA South of Golden Valley Road,north of Highway 55,and west of Decatur Avenue North This area currently contains several small office buildings,the former bowling alley,and Valvoline Rapid Oil Change.This area is very visible from Highway 55,The Tiburon,a six-story, 142-unit apartment building is proposed to be constructed on the site of the former bowling alley and the 7 adjacent office building,which were recently rezoned to High-Density Residential.The remainder of the Area 1A could remain commercial or move to residential uses. Area 16 South of Golden Valley Road and north of Highway 55,where It exits to Highway 169. This area is located directly north of the Highway 169/Highway 55 Interchange and is zoned Commercial. National Camera Exchange Is currently located at this site. It has relocated from another site in the Area and may wish to further expand in the future. Area 2 North of Golden Valley Road from Highway 169,east halfway to Decatur Avenue North Two office buildings,two single family homes,and a five-building apartment complex(Trentwood, 54 units)are located in this area.Trentwood is zoned medium-density residential and the rest of the parcels are zoned Business and Professional Offices.The easterly office building and single family homes are currently listed for sale. If the parcels are joined and redeveloped, residential or institutional uses on those properties would complement the existing and proposed residential development in the area.Alternately,if redeveloped as Business and Professional Offices,the site would relate to the office use to the west and north. Area 3 North of Golden Valley Road from Decatur Avenue North,west to the mid-block This area includes Red Lobster Restaurant and two fast food restaurants and is zoned Commercial. While this area is appropriate for continued long-term commercial and retail use,it may develop more densely in the future if the current uses end. Golden Valley Road serves as the frontage road for Highway 55 in this area.The road currently ends at Decatur Avenue North,with frontage road signage directing drivers north on Decatur Avenue and east on 7a'Avenue. It may be beneficial to realign the frontage road in this area to provide a continuous roadway and eliminate confusing turning movements.The current access to Highway 55 at Decatur does not provide standard,save vehicular movement. Area 4 North of Highway 55 west of Boone Avenue North,south of 70 Avenue,and east of Decatur Avenue North This area contains two restaurants,an automotive service shop,and a vacant parcel,all of which are zoned Commercial.With Its highway visibility and proximity to the Boone Avenue/Highway 55 intersection,this area could redevelop into more intense uses, particularly if a number of the parcels are consolidated. Definitions The terms defined in this section have the meanings given herein,unless the context in which they are used indicates a different meaning: "Authority" means the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Golden Valley. "City"means the City of Golden Valley,Minnesota,also referred to as a"Municipality'. 8 "City Council" means the City Council of the City. " o n " means Hennepin County, Minnesota. "Governing Body'means the Board of Commissioners of the Authority. "HRA Act"means the Minnesota Municipal Housing and Redevelopment Act, Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 through 469.047,both inclusive. "Land Use Regulations"means all federal,state and local laws, rules, regulations,ordinances and plans relating to or governing the use or development of land in the Project Area, including but not limited to environmental,platting,zoning and building code laws,regulations and ordinances. "Prolect Area" means the geographic area of the Highway 55 West Redevelopment Project Area. "Public Costs" means the costs of land acquisition,public and site improvements,repayment of debt service on tax increment bonds,and other eligible costs as set forth in the Redevelopment Plan and Tax Increment Financing Plan(s). "Redevelopment Plan"means the Redevelopment Plan for the Project Area. "State"means the State of Minnesota. "TIF Act"means Minnesota Statutes,Sections 469.174 through 469.179, both Inclusive. "TIF District" means any tax increment financing district presently established or to be established in the future in the Project Area. "TIF Plan"means the respective tax increment financing plan for each TIF district located within the Project Area. Administration of Redevelopment Project Maintenance and Opemtions Maintenance and operation of the Project Area will be the responsibility of the HRA Director, who shall serve as administrator of the Project Area. Each year the administrator will submit to the Governing Body the maintenance and operation budget for the following year. The administrator will administer the Redevelopment Plan pursuant to the provisions of the HRA Act, provided,however,that such powers may only be exercised at the direction of the Governing Body. No action taken by the administrator pursuant to the above-mentioned powers shall be effective without authorization by the Governing Body. Payment of Public Costs It is anticipated that the Public Costs of the Project Area will be paid primarily from tax increments or proceeds of tax increment bonds.Such costs are identified in the TIF Plan(s)for the corresponding TIF District(s)located within the Project Area. The Authority reserves the right to 9 use other sources of revenue legally applicable to the Project Area to pay for such Public Costs including, but not limited to,special assessments,federal or state funds,and investment income. Property Acquisition and Proposed Reuse The HRA may acquire property,or appropriate interest therein,within the Project Area as It deems necessary or desirable to assist in the Implementation of the Redevelopment Plan. The Redevelopment Plan contemplates that the HRA may acquire property and reconvey the same to another entity. Prior to formal consideration of the acquisition of any property,the Governing Body will require the execution of a binding development agreement with respect thereto and evidence that tax increments or other funds will be available to repay the Public Costs associated with the proposed acquisition. It is the intent of the HRA to negotiate the acquisition of property whenever possible. Appropriate restrictions regarding the reuse and redevelopment of property shall be incorporated into any development agreement to which the HRA is a party. Relocation Any person or business that is displaced as a result of the Redevelopment Pian will be relocated in accordance with the provisions of the HRA Act and other applicable state law. Environmental Controls;Land Use Regulations All HRA actions, public improvements,and private development shall be carried out in a manner consistent with existing environmental controls and all applicable Land Use Regulations. Park and Open Space to be Created Park and open space created within the Project Area will be done so in accordance with the zoning and platting ordinances of the City. Amendments The HRA reserves the right to alter and amend the Redevelopment Plan subject to the provisions of state law regulating such action. 20 AV GUOOS -- $ � a N. eAV m4loia w N 9AV in;eoe Cm F �w N O q w M � O M1 O GAN UVISU 4 4 IL al x w W O w " S" 11 city ( 1 1, .11„„1 iiiiiiiiiiii � ' of uoioi � '11 II Administrative Services Department 763-593-8013/763-593-3969(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting September 1, 2015 Agenda Item 6. A. Resolution Adopting Proposed 2016 Budget and Proposed Tax Levies Payable in 2016 Prepared By Sue Virnig, Finance Director Summary State Law requires the certification of a proposed budget and proposed tax levies no later than September 30, 2015. The final property tax levy for pay 2016 will be adopted by the City Council in December, can be less than the proposed levy, but not greater. The property tax levy, included as part of the 2016-2017 Proposed Budget, is currently$19,942,310. The General Fund levy portion is $14,487,955. At the meeting, City staff will make a short presentation reviewing the Proposed 2016-2017 General Fund Budget and Proposed Tax Levies Payable in 2016. Attachments • Resolution Adopting a Proposed 2016 Budget and Proposed Tax Levies Payable in 2016 (1 page) • 2016-2017 Proposed Revenue Summary (3 pages) • 2016-2017 Proposed Expenditure Summary by Division (3 pages) Recommended Action Motion to adopt Resolution Proposed 2016 Budget and Proposed Tax Levies Payable in 2016. Resolution 15-73 September 1, 2015 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE PROPOSED 2016 BUDGET AND PROPOSED TAX LEVYPAYABLE IN 2016 WHEREAS, State Law requires the certification of a proposed budget and proposed tax levies no later than September 30, 2015; and WHEREAS, the City Council has met and discussed the proposed budget and tax levy; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that there is hereby levied upon all taxable property located within the City of Golden Valley the following amounts: General Tax Levy $14,487,955 Bonded Debt Levy: Certificates of Indebtedness 827,400 Street Improvement Bonds 4,326,955 Tax Abatement Levy 300,000 TOTAL Tax Levy $19,942,310 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the City Clerk shall certify to the Hennepin County Auditor a copy of this resolution approving the property tax levies for collection in 2016 for the City of Golden Valley. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the proposed 2016 budget of the General Fund is $17,785,195 and the proposed 2017 budget is approved in concept only. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council declares its intent to take all necessary actions legally permissible to the submission and approval of the City's budget and property tax levies both proposed and final. Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: Kristine Luedke, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by the City Clerk. City of Golden Valley Proposed 2016-2017 General Fund Revenue Report 2013 2014 2015 2015 2015% 2016 2016 %2016 2017 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated B VS E Concept Proposed 2015 Concept AD VALOREM TAXES 4011 AD VALOREM TAXES 12,071,458 12,352,353 13,440,310 13,440,310 100.00% 14,148,640 14,487,955 107.79% 15,261,300 ALLOWANCE FOR ABATEMENTS/DEL 28,393 48,207 (174,155) (174,155) (174,145) (174,145) (174,145) LESS HOMESTEAD CREDIT 4012 PENALTIES&INTEREST 21,752 30,826 TOTAL AD VALOREM TAXES 12,121,603 12,431,386 13,266,155 13,266,155 100.00% 13,974,495 14,313,810 105.34% 15,087,155 LICENSES 4021 LICENSE-GAS/OIL 25 25 25 - 0.00% 25 - 0.00% - 4022 LICENSE-VEHICLE REPAIR - 25 25 25 100.00% 25 25 100.00% 25 4023 LICENSE-NEW/USED VEHICLES 4,425 4,400 4,400 4,400 100.00% 4,400 4,400 100.00% 4,400 4026 LICENSE-WINE ON/SALES 10,000 12,000 10,000 12,000 120.00% 10,000 12,000 120.00% 12,000 4027 LICENSE-LIQUOR ON/SALE 101,300 131,300 113,300 96,000 84.73% 113,300 96,000 84.73% 96,000 4028 LICENSE-LIQUOR OFF SALE 1,600 1,200 1,200 800 66.67% 1,200 800 66.67% 800 4029 LICENSE-NONINTOXON SALE 1,500 1,000 1,500 3,500 233.33% 1,500 3,500 233.33% 3,500 4030 LICENSE-NONINTOX OFF SALE 300 300 300 300 100.00% 300 300 100.00% 300 4031 LICENSE-SUNDAY LIQUOR 2,800 3,800 2,800 2,400 85.71% 2,800 2,400 85.71% 2,400 4032 LICENSE-TAVERN 375 375 375 375 100.00% 375 375 100.00% 375 4033 LICENSE-CIGARETTE 4,950 4,125 4,675 4,125 88.24% 4,675 4,125 88.24% 4,125 4034 LICENSE-DOG 250 500 - - 0.00% - - 0.00% - 4038 LICENSE-GARBAGE COLLECTORS 3,900 4,150 4,000 4,000 100,00% 4,000 4,000 100.00% 4,000 4041 LICENSE-PEDDLER/SOLICITOR 930 1,060 500 500 100.00% 500 500 100.00% 500 4044 LICENSE-GAS STATION 3,950 3,650 3,650 3,650 100.00% 3,650 3,650 100.00% 3,650 4046 LICENSE-APARTMENT 73,484 80,911 60,000 70,000 116.67% 60,000 70,000 116.67% 70,000 4047 LICENSE-GAMBLING 200 100 200 100 50.00% 200 100 50.00% 100 4048 LICENSE-AMUSE DEVIC 315 330 315 270 85.71% 315 270 85.71% 270 4051 LICENSE-PAWN 5,400 - - - - 4052 LICENSE-HEATING 14,700 14,700 13,500 13,500 100.00% 13,500 13,500 100.00% 13,500 4058 LICENSE-MASSAGE 10,200 4,620 750 1,520 202.67% 750 1,520 202.67% 1,520 4059 LICENCE-CHICKEN COOP/RUN 25 100 50 125 50 501 50 TOTAL LICENSES 240,629 268,671 221,565 217,590 98.21% 221,565 217,515 100.00% 217,515 PERMITS 4101 PERMIT-BUILDING 750,015 790,325 520,390 520,390 100.00% 520,390 523,840 100.66% 523,840 4102 PERMIT-PLUMBING 105,574 61,767 25,000 30,000 120.00% 25,000 30,000 120.00% 30,000 4103 PERMIT-SEWER 31,600 30,400 35,000 30,000 85.71% 35,000 30,000 85.71% 30,000 4104 PERMIT-HEATING 200,147 203,228 85,000 100,000 117.65% 85,000 85,000 100.00% 85,000 4105 PERMIT-WATER 4,733 3,225 1,100 1,815 165.00% 1,100 1,100 100.00% 1,100 4107 PERMIT-STREET EXCAVATING 34,275 30,945 42,000 20,000 47.62% 42,000 20,000 47.62% 20,000 4109 PERMIT-BILLBOARD 8,955 17,553 5,800 10,000 172.41% 5,800 7,500 129.31% 7,500 4114 PERMIT-TEMPORARY OCCUPENCY 3,200 3,600 1,900 1,900 100.00% 1,900 1,900 100.00% 1,900 4115 PERMIT-REFUNDS(20%) 124 (491) - 25 - - 0.00% - 4116 PERMIT-GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSI 7,600 7,175 5,000 5,000 100.00% 5,000 5,000 100.00% 5,000 4117 PERMIT-TREE PRESERVATION 900 900 300 900 300.00% 300 900 300.00% 900 4118 PERMIT-EASEMENT VACATION 3,000 - - - - - - 4119 PERMIT-ELECTRICAL 105,601 61,905 78,410 85,080 108.51% 78,410 94,660 120.72% 94,660 4120 PERMIT-FIREWORKS 100 100 100 100 100.00% 100 100 100.00% 100 TOTAL PERMITS 1,255,824 1,210,632 800,000 805,210 100.65% 800,000 800,000 100.00% 800,000 FEDERAL GRANTS 4132 FED VEST PROGRAM 2,070 4132 JAG GRANT - - 4132.3 DWI ENFORCEMENT - 15,659 4136 FED-FIRE GRANTS 13,860 TOTAL FEDERAL GRANTS 31,589 - - - STATE GRANTS 4146 ENERGY SECURITY GRANT - 4150 FIRE POST BOARD TRAINING GRANT 14,350 5,440 10,600 5,440 10,600 5,440 5,440 4151 STATE AID 2,953 15,000 - - - - - 4152 LOCAL GOVERNMENT AID(LGA) - 219,081 240,500 240,500 240,500 252,440 240,500 4153 POLICE TRAINING 10,253 9,011 10,500 10,500 100.00% 10,500 10,500 100.00% 10,500 4153.1 OPERATION NIGHT CAP - - - 4153.2 MN HEAT - 4153.4 SAFE AND SOBER GRANT 19,796 - 4153.6 VEST REIMBURSEMENT GRANT 567 4,377 4153.7 TREE PLANTING GRANT 15,000 TOTAL STATE GRANTS 62,919 252,909 261,600 256,440 98.03% 261,600 268,380 100.00% 256,440 COUNTY GRANTS 4177 VOTF 23,043 31,758 31,205 31,205 TOTAL COUNTY GRANTS 23,043 31,758 31,205 31,205 - City of Golden Valley Proposed 2016-2017 General Fund Revenue Report 2013 2014 2015 2015 2015% 2016 2016 %2016 2017 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated B VS E Concept Proposed 2015 Concept GENERAL GOVERNMENT 4191 CERTIFICATION FEE 13,890 16,500 12,000 12,000 100.00% 12,000 12,000 100.00% 12,000 4194 ADMIN LIQUOR LICENSE 2,000 3,000 - 500 - - - 4195 TEMPORARY RETAIL SALES FEE 150 150 - - 4196 GENERAL GOVT-GEN SER 13,205 3,777 4,050 6,400 158.02% 4,050 4,050 100.00% 4,050 4197 FILING FEES 70 - 15 15 - - 10 4198 PLANNING MATERIAL 30 - 50 - 0.00% 50 0.00% - 4199 ASSESSMENT SEARCHES 15 15 - - - 4200 LIQUOR LICENSE CHECKING 2,400 2,900 2,200 2,400 109.09% 2,200 2,200 100.00% 2,200 4202 WEB DESIGNER 25,391 23,087 - - #DIV/0! - - #DIV/0! - 4203 COPY/MAILING FEES 641 318 750 750 100.00% 750 750 100.00% 750 4204 DOMESTIC PARTNERSHIP REG 80 40 TOTAL GENERAL GOVERMENT 57,872 49,787 19,065 22,065 115.74% 19,050 19,000 99.92% 19,010 PUBLIC SAFETY 4226 BRECK TRAFFIC CONTROL 53,922 55,612 53,000 53,000 100.00% 53,000 53,000 100.00% 53,000 4227 DRUG TASK FORCE REIMBURSE 23,797 15,966 25,595 - 0.00% 26,235 0.00% 4228 ALARM ORDINANCE VIOLATION 10,800 10,228 8,000 8,000 100.00% 8,000 8,000 100.00% 8,000 4229 SECURITY SERVICES 15,400 8,985 12,000 12,000 100.00% 12,000 12,000 100.00% 12,000 4230 POLICE DEPT CHARGES 4,220 SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER-281 20,676 32,050 34,000 32,690 - 4231 FIRE DEPT CHARGES 43,632 44,587 40,000 40,000 100.00% 40,000 40,000 100.00% 40,000 4232 ANIMAL IMPOUND FEES 945 2,120 1,000 1,000 100.00% 1,000 1,000 100.00% 1,000 4233 ACCIDENT REPORTS 425 295 475 475 100.00% 475 475 100.00% 475 4237 NUISANCE VIOLATION 1,022 75 1,000 500 50.00% 1,000 500 50.00% 500 4238 SAFETY CAMP 390 - - - 4239 ANIMAL IMPOUND CONTRACT-RO 4,847 7,488 3,000 3,000 100.00% 3,000 3,000. 100.00% 3,000 TOTAL PUBLIC SAFETY 159,400 166,032 176,120 151,975 86.29% 144,710 150,665 104.12% 117,975 PUBLIC WORKS 4258 PLANNING&ZONING FEES 14,875 17,525 6,000 7,500 125.00% 6,000 6,000 100.00% 6,000 4251 CHGS FOR STREET DEPT 2,527 2,662 3,000 2,800 93.33% 3,000 2,800 93.33% 2,800 4254 WEED CUTTING (1,000) 7,954 2,000 2,000 100.00% 2,000 2,000 100.00% 2,000 4255 STREET LIGHT MAINT CHGS 134,724 140,018 130,000 135,000 103.85% 130,000 135,000 103.85% 135,000 4256 CHGS FOR ENGINEERING (105) 10 TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS 151,021 168,169 141,000 147,300 104.47% 141,000 145,800 100.00% 145,800 PARK&RECREATION 4302 POLICE ON DUTY-COMM CENTER 600 360 1,000 1,000 100.00% 1,000 1,000 100.00% 1,000 4303 POP MACHINE AT BROOKVIEW - 61 100 100 100.00% 100 - 0.00% - 4303 LIQUOR REVENUE 914 761 - - 0.00% - - 0.00% - 4305 MISC INCOME-BROOKVIEW - 114 50 50 100.00% 50 50 100.00% 50 4306 BUILDING RENTAL-BROOKVIEW 17,578 19,998 18,000 22,000 122.22% 18,000 18,000 100.00% 22,000 4307 PICNIC SHELTER RENTAL 25,679 25,978 28,500 28,500 100.00% 28,500 28,500 100.00% 28,500 4308 LIQUOR PERMIT/SHELTER 2,795 2,875 2,600 2,800 107.69% 2,600 2,800 107.69% 2,800 4309 PARK/RINKRENTAL 7,958 3,095 3,000 3,000 100.00% 3,000 3,000 100.00% 3,000 4310 TENNIS COURT RENTAL 4,998 1,296 3,000 3,000 100.00% 3,000 3,000 100.00% 3,000 4311 GYM RENTAL 12,530 24,030 7,000 12,000 171.43% 7,000 12,000 171.43% 12,000 4312 RENTAL-PICNIC KITS 270 145 350 - 0.00% 350 - 0.00 4313 OPEN GYM-MEADOWBROOK 8,511 8,197 9,500 9,500 100.00% 9,500 9,500 100.00% 9,500 4314 MUSIC SPONSORSHIPS - 1,490 - 1,500 - 1,500 1,500 4327 ADULT SAND VOLLEYBALL - 1,500 1,600 1,700 106.25% 1,600 1,700 1,750 4328 ADULT CO REC SOCCER 5,500 6,165 11,000 7,100 64.55% 11,000 7,100 64.55% 7,200 4329 ADULT SOFTBALL 39,827 37,980 39,000 39,000 100.00% 39,000 39,000 100.00% 39,000 4331 ADULT-BASKETBALL - - - 3,600 3,650 3,800 4332 ADULT BROOMBALL 1,960 - 8,200 - 0.00% 8,200 - 0.00% - 4383ADULT-TENNIS LESSONS 20,167 5,000 - 0.00% 5,000 - 0.00% - 4337 ADULT GENERAL-DANCE INSTRUCT 3,743 3,415 5,000 0.00% 5,000 0.00% - 4341 ADULT GENERAL-MISCELLANEOUS 29,932 29,794 26,000 29,000 111.54% 26,000 29,000 111.54% 29,000 4354 ADULT-REFUNDS 45 55 - - 0.00% - - 0.00% - 4360 SUMMER-ARTS/CRAFTS - - 1,500 - 0.00% 1,500 - 0.00% - 4361 SUMMER-SPORTS 19,328 16,998 26,000 20,000 76.92% 26,000 20,000 76.92% 20,000 4362 SUMMER-TINY TOTS - - 1,000 1,000 100.00% 1,000 1,000 100.00% 1,000 4363 SUMMER-FIELD TRIPS 1,139 852 2,200 2,200 100.00% 2,200 2,200 100.00% 2,200 4364 SUMMER-PENNY CARNIVAL 382 270 500 500 100.00% 500 500 100.00% 500 4368 SUMMER-MISCELLANEOUS 89 96 2,500 4,000 160.00% 2,500 4,000 160.00% 4,000 4369 YOUTH-HOCKEY (5) - 900 900 100.00% 900 900 100.00% 900 4371 YOUTH-MUSIC LESSONS 16,792 14,363 10,500 14,000 133.33% 10,500 15,000 142.86% 15,000 4372 YOUTH-TINY TOTS 3,408 3,406 3,000 3,500 116.67% 3,000 3,500 116.67% 3,500 4373 YOUTH-GYM SPORTS 870 1,175 - 1,200 #DIV/0! - 1,200 1,200 4375 YOUTH-SATURDAY/SANTA - - 800 - 0.00% 800 - 0.00% - 4376 YOUTH-DRAMA 5,654 4,250 5,000 5,000 100.00% 5,000 5,000 100001/61 00.00% 5,000 4377 YOUTH-GENERAL 28,637 30,220 20,000 28,500 142.50% 20,000 28,500 142.50% 28,500 4378 YOUTH-BASKETBALL 11,080 12,518 10,000 12,000 120.00% 10,000 12,000 120.00% 12,000 4379 YOUTH-SOCCER 2,726 1,643 11,000 8,000 72.73% 11,000 8,000 72.73% 8,000 4382 YOUTH-TENNIS LESSONS 239,925 40,000 35,000 41,500 118.57% 35,000 42,000 120.00% 44,000 City of Golden Valley Proposed 2016-2017 General Fund Revenue Report 2013 2014 2015 2015 2015% 2016 2016 %2016 2017 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated B VS E Concept Proposed 2015 Concept 4385 TAP AND BALLET 8,774 7,808 9,000 9,000 100.00% 9,000 9,000 100.00% 9,000 4386 TAP AND BALLET COSTUMES 1,815 2,126 2,000 2,000 100.00% 2,000 2,000 100.00% 2,000 4389 USE OF PARK-LEAGUES 10,649 13,878 16,000 14,000 87.50% 16,000 14,000 87.50% 14,000 4399 YOUTH-REFUNDS 445 100 #DIV/0! - - - 4412 SENIOR ACTIVITIES 2,194 2,788 2,500 2,500 100.00% 2,500 2,500 100.00% 2,500 4413 SENIOR EVENTS 1,159 726 2,000 1,500 75.00% 2,000 1,500 75.00% 1,500 4414 SENIOR CLASSES&SEMINARS 8,929 7,209 6,000 6,000 100.00% 6,000 7,500 125.00% 7,500 4415 SENIOR TRIPS 42,308 54,746 60,000 55,000 91.67% 60,000 55,000 91.67% 55,000 4420 SENIOR-REFUNDS 55 40 TOTAL PARK AND RECREATION 589,360 382,521 396,300 396,150 99.96% 396,300 395,100 100.00% 401,400 OTHER FUNDS 4433 CHGS TO CONSTRUCTION FUND 107,160 121,559 200,000 100,000 50.00% 200,000 150,000 75.00% 150,000 4434 CHGS TO UTILITY FUND 275,000 275,000 275,000 275,000 100.00% 275,000 275,000 100.00% 275,000 4435 CHGS TO BROOKVIEW FUND 85,000 85,000 85,000 85,000 100.00% 85,000 85,000 100.00% 85,000 4436 CHGS TO MOTOR VEHICLE FUND 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 100.00% 30,000 4437 CHGS TO RECY FUND 51,500 51,500 51,500 51,500 100.00% 51,500 51,500 100.00% 51,500 4438 CHGS TO CEMETARY FUND 300 400 - - - 4439 HRA TRANS-ADMIN 140,000 140,000 - - - - - 4440 CHGS TO STORM UTILITY FUND 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,0001 100.00% 200,000 200,0001 100.00% 200,000 TOTAL OTHER FUNDS 888,960 903,459 841,500 741,500 88.12% 841,500 791,500 100.00% 791,500 FINES&FORFEITURES 4155 COURT FINES&FORFEITURES 366,059 310,318 320,425 320,425 1 100.00% 320,425 320,425 100.00% 320,425 TOTAL FINES&FORFEITURES 366,059 310,318 320,425 320,425 100.00% 320,425 320,425 100.00% 320,425 INTEREST ON INVESTMENTS 4471 INTEREST ON INVESTMENTS 18,995 67,758 100,000 75,000 75.00% 100,000 100,000 100.00% 100,000 INTEREST ON INVESTMENTS 18,995 67,758 100,000 75,000175.00% 100,000 100,000 100.00% 100,000 TRANSFERSIN 4501 PERMANENT TRANSFERS-GOLF 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 1 00.00% 50,000 - 0.00% - 4501 PERMANENT TRANS-MOTOR VEH 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 100.00% 50,000 30,000 60.00% 30,000 TOTAL TRANSFERS IN 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100.00% 100,000 30,000 100.00% 30,000 OTHER REVENUE 4479 TOWER RENTAL 50,653 55,795 40,000 40,000 100.00% 40,000 40,000 100.00% 40,000 4480 BUILDING RENTS -BROOKVIEW GOLF COURSE 127,200 127,200 127,200 127,200 100.00% 127,200 127,200 100.00% 127,200 -MOTOR VEHICLE LICENSING 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 -VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 100.00% 22,000 24,000 109.09% 26,000 4478 SPECIAL ASSESS COLL-COUNTY 16,858 13,768 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 4483 CONTRIBUTIONS&DONATIONS 2,450 310 4492 TIF DISTRIBUTION TOTAL OTHER REVENUE 241,161 241,073 221,200 221,200 100.00% 221,200 223,200 100.00% 225,200 MISCELLANEOUS COSTS 4476 BURIAL CHARGE-CEMETERY 1,700 2,450 2,000 2,000 100.00% 1,500 2,000 2,000 4707 PENALTIES 4,401 4474 SCRAP METAL 6,897 2,598 2,000 2,500 125.00% 2,000 2,500 125.00% 2,500 4486 MISCELLANEOUS RECEIPTS 5,776 5,089 500 4,500 500 4,500 4,500 4489 ATM 2,087 767 1,500 800 53.33% 1,500 1 8001. 53.33% 800 TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS COSTS 20,861 10,904 6,000 9,800 163.33% 5,500 19,800 163.33% 9,800 GENERAL FUND TOTAL $ 16,297,707 $ 16,626,966 $ 16,902,135 E 16,762,015 99.17% $ 17,547,345 $ 17,785,195 105.22% $ 18,522,220 CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY PROPOSED 2016-2017 OPERATING BUDGET DIVISION 2013 2014 2015 2015 2016 2016 2017 /PROGRAM ACTUAL ACTUAL ADOPTED ESTIMATED CONCEPT PROPOSED CONCEPT 001 COUNCIL 1001 COUNCIL $295,068 $257,659 $315,690 $355,445 $304,520 $307,115 $315,875 1002 CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION 3,755 - 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 1003 HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION 195 1,354 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 1040 ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION 896 799 1,925 1,925 1,200 1,925 1,925 1050 PLANNING COMMISSION 1,724 3,037 2,555 3,565 2,610 3,630 3,820 1060 PARK&OPEN SPACE COMM 922 - 1,645 1,645 1,645 1,645 1,645 1070 BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS 1,045 635 1,135 1,135 1,135 1,145 1,145 1080 ENVISION - 1,784 - - - - TOTAL DIVISION(001) 303,605 265,268 330,450 371,215 318,610 322,960 331,910 003 CITY MANAGER 1030 CITY MANAGER 414,078 455,020 518,555 518,810 528,030 526,155 537,765 1031 CITY COMMUNICATION 241,400 239,264 256,385 256,385 263,745 272,105 280,675 TOTAL DIVISION(003) 655,478 694,284 774,940 775,195 791,775 798,260 818,440 004 TRANSFERS OUT 1025 TRANSFERS OUT 1,184,710 986,710 475,000 529,000 625,000 725,000 850,000 TOTAL DIVISION(004) 1,184,710 986,710 475,000 529,000 625,000 725,000 850,000 005 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 1101 GENERAL SERVICES 641,642 677,012 651,485 692,300 660,085 713,200 733,785 1102 ACCOUNTING 248,895 261,180 274,660 274,105 281,375 280,820 288,810 1105 COMPUTER SERVICES 649,405 708,592 761,775 773,165 780,340 806,085 835,250 1142 ELECTIONS 18,444 36,000 39,000 39,000 72,305 69,890 38,250 TOTAL DIVISION(005) 1,558,386 1,682,784 1,726,920 1,778,570 1,794,105 1,869,995 1,896,095 006 LEGAL SERVICES 1121 LEGAL SERVICES 83,818 134,296 139,050 139,050 200,000 150,000 250,000 TOTAL DIVISION(006) 83,818 134,296 139,050 139,050 200,000 150,000 250,000 007 RISK MANAGEMENT 1115 INSURANCE 222,559 240,918 300,000 300,000 305,000 305,000 314,150 TOTAL DIVISION(007) 222,559 240,918 300,000 300,000 305,000 305,000 314,150 011 BUILDING OPERATIONS 1180 BUILDING OPERATIONS 562,130 613,628 560,590 567,790 610,590 567,790 618,820 TOTAL DIVISION(011) 562,130 613,628 560,590 567,790 610,590 567,790 618,820 016 PLANNING 1166 PLANNING 297,689 302,542 303,780 317,480 310,830 353,800 366,100 TOTAL DIVISION(016) 297,689 302,542 303,780 317,480 310,830 353,800 366,100 018 INSPECTIONS 1162 INSPECTIONS 636,769 677,758 704,575 712,745 721,640 737,265 753,605 CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY PROPOSED 2016-2017 OPERATING BUDGET DIVISION 2013 2014 2015 2015 2016 2016 2017 /PROGRAM ACTUAL ACTUAL ADOPTED ESTIMATED CONCEPT PROPOSED CONCEPT TOTAL DIVISION(018) 636,769 677,758 704,575 712,745 721,640 737,265 753,605 022 POLICE 1300 POLICE ADMINISTRATION 859,380 890,642 911,320 917,020 933,050 949,615 979,230 1320 POLICE OPERATIONS 3,849,098 3,910,043 4,351,265 4,318,765 4,460,630 4,434,820 4,590,400 1321 DRUG TASK FORCE 23,797 15,080 25,595 - 26,235 - - 1323 SAFE AND SOBER 23,852 15,966 - - 1324 POLICE SECURITY SERVICES-PO - 3,040 - - - - - 1130 PROSECUTION AND COURT 231,493 239,836 280,680 281,080 285,430 286,745 290,745 TOTAL DIVISION(022) 4,987,620 5,074,607 5,568,860 5,516,865 5,705,345 5,671,180 5,860,375 023 FIRE 1346 FIRE ADMINISTRATION 946,592 1,034,707 1,255,045 1,255,150 1,286,215 1,290,210 1,336,090 TOTAL DIVISION(023) 946,592 1,034,707 1,255,045 1,255,150 1,286,215 1,290,210 1,336,090 035 PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT ADMIN 1400 PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT ADMIN 317,053 356,927 285,180 289,820 291,800 298,755 306,930 TOTAL DIVISION(035) 317,053 356,927 285,180 289,820 291,800 298,755 306,930 036 ENGINEERING 1420 GENERAL ENGINEERING 294,203 263,378 425,280 421,715 434,370 433,860 457,285 1425 TRAFFIC SIGNALS 34,178 44,104 49,000 49,000 49,000 49,000 49,000 1430 STREET LIGHTING 225,012 213,756 250,000 250,000 265,000 265,000 265,000 1452 MISC CONCRETE REPAIR 32,702 37,936 35,610 35,610 35,610 35,610 35,610 TOTAL DIVISION(036) 586,095 559,174 759,890 756,325 783,980 783,470 806,895 037 STREETS 1440 STREET MAINTENANCE 1,177,844 1,308,498 1,298,845 1,385,040 1,340,460 1,428,130 1,463,860 1448 SNOW AND ICE CONTROL 223,110 193,152 174,525 177,395 175,725 183,735 190,615 TOTAL DIVISION(037) 1,400,954 1,501,650 1,473,370 1,562,435 1,516,185 1,611,865 1,654,475 065 COMMUNITY CENTERS 1605 COMMUNITY CENTER 28,548 31,499 37,605 37,605 38,405 42,400 43,250 1669 RONALD B DAVIS CC 30,583 35,597 38,010 38,010 38,720 38,695 39,525 TOTAL DIVISION(065) 59,131 67,096 75,615 75,615 77,125 81,095 82,775 066 PARK AND REC ADMINISTRATION 1600 PARK AND REC ADM 618,082 658,065 698,640 697,935 713,620 705,660 728,165 TOTAL DIVISION(066) 618,082 658,065 698,640 697,935 713,620 705,660 728,165 067 PARK MAINTENANCE 1620 PARK MAINTENANCE 818,076 852,281 900,400 911,820 923,370 937,480 964,580 1646 TREE MAINTENANCE 160,982 187,246 195,340 195,430 197,665 200,415 203,115 TOTAL DIVISION(067) 979,058 1,039,527 1,095,740 1,107,250 1,121,035 1,137,895 1,167,695 CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY PROPOSED 2016-2017 OPERATING BUDGET DIVISION 2013 2014 2015 2015 2016 2016 2017 /PROGRAM ACTUAL ACTUAL ADOPTED ESTIMATED CONCEPT PROPOSED CONCEPT 068 PARK AND REC PROGRAMS ADULT PROGRAMS: 1596 ADULT-SAND VOLLEYBALL - 1,228 1,600 1,550 1,600 1,600 1,665 1597 ADULT-SOFTBALL 21,254 22,548 24,685 24,685 24,685 25,155 25,770 1598 ADULT-SOCCER 3,787 4,165 8,190 6,755 8,190 6,960 7,155 1599 ADULT-BASKETBALL 0 0 0 3,415 0 3,505 3,605 1680 ADULT-GENERAL ACTIVITIES 29,517 31,184 28,305 28,305 28,305 28,825 28,345 1681 ADULT-BROOMBALL/HOCKEY 1,493 - 5,455 - 5,455 - - 1684 ADULT-TENNIS LESSONS 7,964 7,000 - 7,000 - - TOTAL ADULT PROGRAMS 64,015 59,125 75,235 64,710 75,235 66,045 66,540 YOUTH PROGRAMS: 1660 YOUTH-SUMMER PARK PROG 70,748 53,837 88,980 89,280 88,980 89,330 90,930 1665 YOUTH-ICE HOCKEY 372 - 2,350 2,350 2,350 2,350 2,390 1670 YOUTH-GENERAL ACTIVITIES 43,877 53,629 46,790 51,010 46,790 51,640 52,165 1673 YOUTH-BASKETBALL 6,657 5,114 7,115 7,115 7,115 7,115 7,115 1675 YOUTH-SOCCER 4,197 4,852 8,270 8,170 8,270 8,200 8,265 1677 YOUTH-BALLET(BOTH) 6,980 7,322 7,395 7,395 7,395 7,520 7,680 1678 YOUTH-WINTER REC TRAILS - 11,164 - 2,215 - 2,235 2,250 1679 YOUTH-RINK SUPERVISION 27,038 23,759 29,865 28,465 29,865 28,465 29,220 1682 YOUTH-TENNIS 208,319 - 5,035 5,035 5,035 10,035 10,035 TOTAL YOUTH PROGRAMS 368,188 159,677 195,800 201,035 195,800 206,890 210,050 SENIOR PROGRAMS 1691 SENIOR ACTIVITY 26,807 25,815 39,655 37,955 39,655 38,260 39,310 1692 SENIOR EVENTS 688 935 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1693 SENIOR CLASSES 6,606 6,406 6,600 6,600 6,600 6,600 6,600 1694 SENIOR TRIPS 39,746 51,690 56,200 56,100 56,200 56,200 56,200 TOTAL SENIOR PROGRAMS 73,847 84,846 103,455 101,655 103,455 102,060 103,110 TOTAL DIVISION(068) 506,050 303,648 374,490 367,400 374,490 374,995 379,700 GENERALFUND TOTAL DIVISIONS $15,905,779 $16,193,589 $16,902,135 $17,119,840 $17,547,345 $17,785,195 $18,522,220