Loading...
09-29-15 BZA Agenda Board of Zoning Appeals Regular Meeting Tuesday, September 29, 2015 7 pm 7800 Golden Valley Road Council Chambers I. Approval of Minutes —August 25, 2015 Regular Meeting II. The Petition(s) are: 3235 Kyle Avenue North Dennis K. Dienst, Applicant Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Single Family Zoning District, Subd. 11(A)(1) Front Yard Requirements • 3.41 ft. off of the required 35 ft. to a distance of 31.59 ft. at its closest point to the front yard (south) property line. Purpose: To allow for the construction of a front porch/entryway addition. 5545 Golden Valley Road Paulette Belgarde, Applicant Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Single Family Zoning District, Subd. 11(A)(3)(C) Side Yard Requirements • 6.4 ft. off of the required 12.5 ft. to a distance of 6.1 ft. at its closest point to the side yard (east) property line. Purpose: To allow for the construction of a home office addition. 1929 Glenwood Parkway Rick Wilson, Riverside Construction, Applicant Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Single Family Zoning District, Subd. 11(A)(3)(C) Side Yard Requirements • 8.5 ft. off of the required 12.5 ft. to a distance of 4 ft. at its closest point to the side yard (east) property line. Purpose: To allow for the construction of a garage addition. Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Single Family Zoning District, Subd. 11(A)(2) Rear Yard Requirements • 1.7 ft. off of the required 25 ft. to a distance of 23.3 ft. at its closest point to the rear yard (north) property line. Purpose: To allow for the construction of a garage addition. Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Single Family Zoning District, Subd. 11(D) Side Wall Articulation Requirements • City Code requires any wall longer than 32 feet in length to be articulated. The applicant is asking that the proposed new east wall be 57.5 feet in length without articulation. 408 Natchez Avenue South Chris Miller, Applicant Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Single Family Zoning District, Subd. 11(A)(3)(b) Side Yard Requirements • 7.1 ft. off of the required 12.5 ft. to a distance of 5.4 ft. at its closest point to the side yard (east) property line. Purpose: To allow for the construction of a garage/home addition. Ill. Other Business IV. Adjournment e 1S3This document isavailable in alternmr s ,,,� 763-593-8006(TTY:availa763-593 3968)to ate makeforats a request. Examples ofrequealternatet.Please formats call may include large print,electronic,Braille,audiocassette,etc. Minutes of a Regular Meeting of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals August 25, 2015 A regular meeting of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals was held on Tuesday, July 28, 2015, at City Hall, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. Chair Perich called the meeting to order at 7 pm. Those present were Members Maxwell, Nelson, Perich and Planning Commission Representative Baker. Also present were Associate Planner/Grant Writer Emily Goellner, and Administrative Assistant Lisa Wittman. Member Orenstein was absent. I. Approval of Minutes — July 28, 2015 Regular Meeting MOVED by Nelson, seconded by Perich and motion carried unanimously to approve the July 28, 2015 minutes as submitted. Commissioner Baker abstained. II. The Petition(s) are: 8025 Medicine Lake Road New Hope Christian Life Center, Applicant Request: Waiver from Section 11.46, Institutional Zoning District, Subd. 8 Front Yard Requirements • City Code requires that all front yards in the Institutional Zoning District be planted, and landscaped, and contain no off-street parking. The applicant is proposing to construct a driveway with parking in the front yard along the south property line. Request: Waiver from Section 11.46, Institutional Zoning District, Subd. 9(B)(2) Accessory Uses - Front Yard Requirements • 25 ft. off of the required 35 ft. to a distance of 10 ft. at its closest point to the front yard (south) property line. Purpose: To allow for the construction of a detached garage. Request: Waiver from Section 11.46, Institutional Zoning District, Subd. 9(B)(3) Accessory Uses -Yard Requirements • 5 ft. off of the required 50 ft. to a distance of 45 ft. at its closest point to the side yard (east) property line. Purpose: To allow for the construction of a detached garage. Minutes of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals August 25, 2015 Page 2 Request: Waiver from Section 11.46, Institutional Zoning District, Subd. 9(B)(6) Accessory Uses — Height Limitations • 2 ft. taller than the allowed 10 ft. to a height of 12 ft. from the floor to the top plate. Purpose: To allow for the construction of a detached garage. Request: Waiver from Section 11.46, Institutional Zoning District, Subd. 9(B)(8) Accessory Uses — Size of Accessory Structure • 152 sq. ft. more than the allowed 1,000 sq. ft. of accessory structure space. Purpose: To allow for the construction of a detached garage. Goellner referred to a location map of the property and explained the applicant's request to construct a 32 ft. x 36 ft. garage along with a 36 ft; wide x 180 ft,. long driveway with parking spaces in the front yard setback area along the south property line. She discussed the requested variances and stated that the Zoning Code requires the entire front yard setback area to be planted and landscaped and contain no off-street parking. She referred to the proposed garage and stated that the applicant is proposing to build it 10 ft. from the south property line rather than the required 35 ft. and 45 ft. from the east property line rather than the required 50 ft. The applicant is also proposing that the garage be 12 ft. in height rather than the allowed 10 ft. Goellner stated that the applicant has said his unique circumstances are the need for indoor storage of materials and vehicles, the fact that the property has two front yards, the need for additional parking and that the proposed location of the garage will have less visual impact than it would elsewhere on the property. Goellner stated that staff is supportive of a garage addition and the proposed 12 ft. of height, but would like to see it placed in a conforming location, not in the location proposed. She said staff is also supportive of allowing a driveway to connect to the proposed new garage, but would like the applicant to provide a 10 ft. wide landscaped buffer and would like the driveway to be 24 ft. in width rather than the proposed 36 ft. Nelson asked what the setback requirement would be along the south property line if that were considered to be a side yard rather than a front yard. Goellner said the side yard setback requirements on this property are 50 ft. Baker asked if there is a minimum width requirement for driveways. Goellner said 11 ft. is the minimum width necessary for functionality, however the City's Engineering Department would like the driveway to be 18 ft. in width at a maximum. She added that the intention of the Zoning Code requirement is to keep the front yard setback area landscaped. Baker asked if there are any topography issues on the property. Goellner said there are significant slopes on the north, west, and east sides of the property. She reiterated that Minutes of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals August 25, 2015 Page 3 staff feels the general location of the proposed garage is ok, they would just like it to be built within the buildable area. Maxwell asked if the property is flat enough to move the garage further to the north. Goellner said yes. Nelson referred to the existing shed on the property and asked if it is located in a conforming location. Goellner said no, and added that there are also some parking spaces on the southwest corner of the property that are non-conforming. Pastor David Kent, Applicant, said he feels this proposal is a positive thing and will be an improvement over what is there now. He stated that the area where they are proposing the new driveway is currently a gravel area where grass won't grow and has been used as a driveway for several years. He explained that he would like the proposed driveway to be 36 ft. in width to allow for parking spaces. He said it has been mentioned that they could park in the street when necessary, but he remembers when they put in a new driveway along the west side of the property that neighbors thought there would be too much traffic on 25th Avenue and the parking would be worse. He said they've considered several other locations for the proposed garage but the property is too steep or the view from Medicine Lake would be impacted. He said they want to keep the costs to a minimum and where they are proposing to place the new garage would only affect one neighbor and that neighbor has been supportive of the project. He added that the 5 ft. variance from the east property may not be needed, he just wants to make sure he has enough space. He stated that if they move the entire garage further north they would require more driveway space which would take away more of the open space. Nelson stated that she is supportive of the variance from the height requirements and the variance from the east side yard property line, but noted that if the garage was moved further to the north there would still be a large area of open space. Maxwell agreed and said the Board doesn't generally favor front yard variance requests, especially one this large. He said he would like to find a compromise by moving the garage further to the north so a front yard variance along the south property line wouldn't be necessary. Kent stated that their church is growing and if they move the proposed garage further to the north itwould impact any future additions to the church building and they would have to go through the variance'process again. He said it would not benefit anyone to move the garage further to the north. He reiterated that this proposal is a positive thing and said he doesn't really consider the south area of their property to be a front yard. Nelson explained that the Board is bound by statutes that they have to follow and the Board needs to remain consistent with the variances they grant. Kent said that codes change over time and he is asking to Board to consider this individual case in a fair and equitable manner. Perich said he thinks there is a lot of space on the property on which to build the proposed garage. He said he is struggling with the idea that it can't be moved further to the north. Maxwell agreed and said the proposed garage strikes him as being too close to the south property line. Baker said one of the criteria used when considering variances is that the need for the variance isn't being caused by landowner. He said the applicant is choosing Minutes of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals August 25, 2015 Page 4 not to build the garage in a conforming location further to the north because of possible future expansion of the church building. Kent said he understands the Board has a job to do, but they've paid a fee to come to them and make their case. He asked the Board what they are proposing he should do. Baker said he would propose that the garage be constructed within the buildable area. Nelson reiterated that she thinks the Board would be supportive of the variances from the east property line and the variance regarding the height. Kent noted that the proposed driveway would be in violation as well. Baker asked if the garage could be reoriented and accessed from 25th Avenue. Maxwell noted that there is no street right-of-way where the garage is proposed to be located. He stated that he would be supportive of the garage being closer than 35 ft. to the south property line, but he feels 10 ft. is too close. Baker agreed that narrowing the driveway and moving the proposed garage further north might be a good compromise. Kent said he would be open to the idea of moving the garage further to the north. Nelson asked if the existing shed on the property would be removed. Kent said yes. Perich opened the public hearing. Carl Hoffstedt, 2450 Valders Avenue North, asked about the proposed distance from the garage to the property line. Goellner stated that the applicant is proposing to locate the garage 10 ft. away from the south property line. Hoffstedt asked about the proposed distance from the garage to the existing home to the south Goellner said it would be approximately 20 ft. Hoffstedt said if that distance is similar to the distance between other homes in the area, then it should be ok. He asked if the proposed parking spaces would be parallel parking spaces. Goellner said yes, they would be parallel spaces along the proposed new driveway. Hoffstedt said he doesn't have a problem with the variance on the east side of the property or the variance regarding the height of the proposed garage but he thinks the new driveway will be used more for parking spaces than as a driveway. He said he supports the proposed new garage because it will clean up the look of the property. Nelson asked Hoffstedt how big of an issue overflow parking is on Valders Avenue and 25th Avenue. Hoffstedt said there isn't an issue on Valders Avenue and there is a little bit of overflow parking on 25th Avenue. Seeing and hearing no one else wishing to comment, Perich closed the public hearing. Nelson reiterated that she is ok with the size and height of the proposed garage, with the variance from the east side property line, and with the driveway being 24 ft. wide, in line with the garage, but she would like it to be further away from the south property line than what is proposed. Perich agreed. Baker asked if a 24 ft. wide driveway would preclude parking. Goellner said it will make parking difficult. Baker said he is not compelled by the need for additional parking and he is not sure why staff is recommending that the driveway could be as wide as 24 ft. Goellner stated that the standard width for a two-way drive aisle is 24 ft. Maxwell suggested the variance request for the garage and driveway be amended to allow 18 ft. off the required 35 ft. to a distance of 17 ft. at their closest point to the front yard Minutes of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals August 25, 2015 Page 5 (south) property line. Perich asked Kent if he would be alright with Member Maxwell's suggested amended variance request. Kent said yes. Baker asked if the existing Cottonwood trees would be required to be removed. Goellner said no. Kent added that they may need to be removed and that he would like to put in trees that would be nicer for the neighborhood. MOVED by Maxwell, seconded by Nelson and motion carried unanimously to approve the following variance requests finding that the proposed location of the garage doesn't act like a front yard, other areas of the property are steep and not buildable, the request is in accordance with the City's regulations, and it is best to have a driveway in-line with the garage. • A driveway with a maximum width of 24 ft. is allowed to be constructed in the front yard (south) setback area. The driveway shall contain no parking and be set back 17 ft. from the south property line with a 17 ft. landscaped buffer between the driveway and the property line. • 18 ft. off of the required 35 ft. to a distance of 17 ft. at its closest point to the front yard (south) property line to allow for the construction of a detached garage. • 5 ft. off of the required 50 ft. to a distance of 45 ft. at its closest point to the side yard (east) property line to allow for the construction of a detached garage. • 2 ft. taller than the allowed 10 ft to a height of 12 ft. from the floor to the top plate to allow for the construction of a detached garage. • 152 sq. ft. more than the allowed 1,000 sq. ft. of accessory structure space to allow for the construction of a detached garage. III. Other Business • Review of recently amended Single Family Zoning District (R-1) setback requirements. Goellner stated that the City Council recently amended the setback requirements in the Single Family Zoning District due to questions regarding the interpretation of the Code language. She showed the Board several examples of recently constructed homes and explained the amended language which focuses on protecting neighboring homes from the blockage of light and air, simplifies the language for better comprehension and administration, and allows for attractive home design by discouraging garage-dominated front facades and preserving back yard areas. Minutes of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals August 25, 2015 Page 6 IV. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 8:15 pm. David Perich, Chair Lisa Wittman, Administrative Assistant city of golden MEMORANDUM Valley Physical Development Department 763-593-8095/763-593-8109(fax) Date: September 29, 2015 To: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals From: Melissa Sonnek, Planning Intern Subject: 3235 Kyle Ave North Dennis Dienst, Applicant Dennis Dienst, owner of the property at 3235 Kyle Ave North, is seeking a variance from the City Code for the addition of an entryway onto a single family home. The applicant is seeking a variance of 3.41 feet off of the required front yard setback of 35 feet to a distance of 31.59 feet from the front yard (east) property line. The applicant is proposing to add an 80 square foot entryway. The addition would be 8 feet wide and 10 feet long. The existing structure is 35 feet from the (east) property line; therefore, any addition in this location would require a variance. Since this is a corner lot, both the east and north facing sides of the house are subject to the 35 foot front yard setback requirement. By adding on to this home, the residents are able to not only have more useable living space, but also a designated storage area for common items such as coats and shoes. The applicant has stated that their current living room/entryway is not allowing the house to function in the most efficient fashion since the fireplace is located immediately adjacent to the door. The applicant was granted a variance for this property in 2002 to build a two-stall garage 32 feet from the north property line. The proposal requires a variance from the following section of City Code: Section 11.21, Single Family Zoning District, Subd. 11(A)(1) Front Yard Setback Requirements: The minimum front yard (east) setback requirement is 35 feet. The Applicant is requesting a variance of 3.41 feet off of the required 35 feet to a distance of 31.59 feet at its closest point to the front yard (east) property line. Staff Recommendation: In reviewing this application, staff has maintained the points of examination to the considerations outlined in Minnesota State Statute 462.357, requiring that a property exhibit "practical difficulties" in order for a variance to be granted. To constitute practical difficulties, the property owner must propose to use the property in a reasonable manner, the landowners' problem must be due to circumstances unique to the property not caused by the landowner, and the variance, if granted, must not alter the essential character of the locality. The proposed amount of space for this addition is reasonable and does not significantly alter the essential character of the home or neighborhood. Since this is an entryway addition,this the most reasonable location for the addition on the home. Staff recommends approval of the request for a variance of 3.41 feet off of the required 35 feet to a distance of 31.59 feet at its closest point to the front yard (east) property line. 3317 33 3312 331014 .---- I 3307 A 3300 9c 3300 • A Stockman Park 442 Subject Property / 3238 Adell Ave �.- (..... 3235 ` 43 3230 3230 3225 3225 3230 -1 3218 :•* 3216 3215 3215 3202 -• a*r 3200 3201 4'::- 3200 3201 ===32 3126 3135 3134 3135 4..:. : " 31 3134 -.�.�?� _______ \ 3120 \ \ 3124 3125 3124 ! 3125 , 3 ( ..S '6 Xi' /2 i 66,,,,e_ Aire7 • ADELL AVE A=95'37'10"= R 18.13 7 L=30.25 A=00'20'37" R=306.90 N84'22'30"E SET IRON* L=1-84- - --'-' ED IRON �•FO IRON , ' -- , ' 1 A , I o \ SET IRON v , n n 1 ' NORTH OD /14.9 i� U7 • r J5 / T tON W 1—STORY FRAME 1 , N 20 61/0-4626_ HOUSE . �`1 2s I,1 3235 KYLE AVE. N. :a'n t""" -,,`31,-,T1 -.--- - V 15.0' / 35.59 O /4.6 o V o z `1 28.0' �1! 35.34 - 0 NL SCALE BUILDING SETBACK LINE a 1 " = 20' , SET IRON i' SET IRON 6, S88'13'25"W 130.48 I SURVEY FOR: DENNIS DIENST PROPERTY ADDRESS: 3235 Kyle Avenue North, Golden Valley, Minnesota. • LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 1 , Block 5, NOBLE—GROVE according to the recorded plat thereof and situate in Hennepin County, Minnesota. I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of the land above described and of the location of all buildings, ,IL if any, thereon, and all visible encroachments, if any, from or on said land. Dated this 7th day of May, 1999. Revised this 20th day of May, 1999. ) by: Jack a olke Minnesota License No. 20281 NOTES: 1. The orientation of this bearing system is based on the South line of Lot 1, Block 5, NOBLE—GROVE which is assumed to have a bearing q of South 88 degrees 13 minutes 25 seconds West. 2. Area of the property described hereon is 11 ,367 square feet or 0.2610 acres. 3. No title work was furnished for the preparation of this survey to verify the existence of any easements or encumbrances. EGAN, FIELD & NOWAK INC. 7415 WayzataPoulevard 2605-25 MInneo olla, MN 55426 SURVEYORS Tele: (612) 546 6837 4785 2 514 ;01 cityof E y . ., . S olden SEP 0 8 2015 g valley 3Y:___— Zoning Code Variance Application 1. Street address: 3 2-3'' 1644--e- A-v %0® 1-j- 2. Applicant Information: Name: iV1 ✓1 S I4- biei-f 5 14- Address: ILAddress: .32-3 c ,4 vE otE A3c)(27-11 Email Address: yD IC—PST- 0 *1-31 .. e-o !� Phone Number: /7 - ''7`f q 3. Provide a detailed description of the variance(s) being requested: We are asking for a variance to the setback to allow us to add an entryway onto the front of our house and a permanent deck for a front porch area. We are asking for a 4'reduction in the setback to 31'from the northeast edge of our house south 23.8'to our current front door entry. 4. Provide a detailed description of need for a variance from the Zoning Code, including: • Description of building(s) • Description of proposed addition(s) • Description of proposed alteration(s) to property We are planning to add an 8'x 10'entryway onto the east side of the house at the doorway covering the width of the doorway and the chimney. This enclosed addition would extend 4'into the setback of the property toward Kyle Avenue.Also, we would like to hang deck off the front of the house on footings covering the 13.4 feet of wall not included in the new entryway. It would end even with the north edge of the house. This would also extend 4'into the setback of the property toward Kyle Avenue. 5. Minnesota State Statute 462.357 requires that a property exhibit "practical difficulties" in order for a variance to be considered. Practical Difficulties: • result in a use that is reasonable. • are based on a problem that is unique to the property. • are not caused by the landowner. • do not alter the essential character of the locality. To demonstrate how your request will comply with Minnesota State Statute 462.357, please respond to the following questions: Explain the need for your variance request and how it will result in a reasonable use of the property. This new entryway will allow us to accept guests without running into the fireplace and walls. It will also allows us a place for coats and shoes to be taken off in more room than we currently have which is 3.5' x 4.5'. We walk our two dogs in all kinds of weather and we need more room to get them ready to go out and wipe them down before letting them lose in the living room. It will also allow for better use of our fireplace which cannot be used because of the airflow coming in when the door is opened. The deck will be used for relaxing with our dogs and enjoying company. We feel this is a simple addition since we need footings for the entryway and can use the same support structure across the whole addition. What is unique about your property and how do you feel that it necessitates a variance? Our current entry is a small tiled area(3.5'x 4.5')that is in our living room. I tiled this carpeted area to make it easier to clean up but it is still difficult to keep clean. This area is very small to get two dogs ready to go out and wipe them down after bad weather. We also do not have any space to allow guests to take off their coats and shoes when they visit. Finally, we cannot use the fireplace because when the door is opened in colder weather the airflow makes smoke go into the house. 5-6 Explain how the need for a variance is based on circumstances that are not a result of a landowner action. This floor plan was in place when we bought the house and we have tried to make the best of it. We tried rugs on the carpet which got in the way of the door. We redid the entry with tile to make it easier to clean but it is still difficult to use this space. 2-4 �D Explain how, if granted, the proposed variance will not alter the essential character of your neighborhood and Golden Valley as a whole. Adding a small entry onto the front of our house will not make a major change to the character of the locality because there are many different types of improvements that have been made to these 1950's homes. This 4'change will not make our house stand out significantly or be farther into the setback than others on our street or neighborhood. 6. The City requests that you consider all available project options that are permitted by the Zoning Code prior to requesting a variance. The Board of Zoning Appeals will discuss alternative options to seeking variance with you at the public hearing. Please describe alternate ways to do your project that do not require variances to the Zoning Code. 1) We tried using rugs near the door, but they always interfered with the door operation. 2) We removed some carpet and tiled a small entry area(3.5'x4.5') but it is still difficult to use. 3) We thought about just enclosing the area open without variance, but that would only be 4'square and will not function well at all. 4) Taking space from our bedroom near the door is not an option since it is already only 10'x12'. 7. Please submit a current survey of your property. You must indicate the proposed addition, including new proposed building and structure setbacks, on the survey. A copy of Golden Valley's survey requirements is available upon request. Please note that this application is considered incomplete without the submittal of a current property survey. 8. Please submit at least one current color photograph of the area affected by the proposed variance. You may attach a printed photograph to this application, or you may email a digital image to planning@goldenvalleymn.gov. You may submit additional photographs as needed. To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct. I also understand that unless construction of the action applicable to this variance request, if granted, is not taken within one year, the variance expires. I have considered all options afforded to me through the City's Zoning Code, and feel that there is no alternate way to achieve my objective except to seek a variance to zoning rules and regulations. I give permission for Golden Valley staff, as well as members of the Board of Zoning Appeals,to enter my property prior to the public hearing t. inspect the area affected by this request. wid0A0-71111h7----- Signature of Applicant r 3Lf If the applicant is not the owner of all property involved in this application, please name the owner of this property: !,)eoms 7b1-' Print Name of owner • Signatur of owner A W4& ()# b(QW5I '4#i,44,024� $200 Application Fee Attached (for Single Family Residential) $300 Application Fee Attached (for all other Zoning Districts) Please note: The City of Golden Valley will send notice of your variance request to all adjoining property owners as well as owners of properties directly across streets or alleys. Your neighbors have the right to address the Board of Zoning Appeals at your public hearing. You are advised to personally contact your neighbors and explain your project to them prior to the public hearing. 4 06 16 41, H ; .,., ,..-: ----. .. ''' VP e mu r It h' „ iV1�Il1�l�lgll�*App �.s„< `l R y tt'l l . i :. ''.1: i"...:::‘14'6::: ' .! -:.... f.: '--- '''....• ii,i - a s1.114 ' x, �- $ I ,....,,..,,:,..,Y.rt..;,,,,., y , : y • 1 ..ir: „ , 410, . eto . 4 ry t'”' ' -4'``'” r. ' -4 .., ",.*. . -11- *4 N, _ .. ---7 - ..,_ . -,,, ., . ... . - it;' may, m. ir 4• I r\ i..: Albh ws�• 00'. s 'N Ai 0.'E D .. • Uv • • t n ' tti.,„ , 4 ''''.4" 4' -. -10;,00;: 141141 111 r.. NI 0 , .'„.'ra ' .„ ,,-,-1,1.i'f:, '-...' . 4 •4'3°'47„":' tf, '3'f°44°.t,r-......**4 ti, O • 1 s _ "_3: 3 I ! n # '`i .'1# '-' I i ii. , y i \Pi 6E . '"...47F''''''. • ' air i , . N. NI i ,...7, ‘.4,.. ,.. _ h ' ' s9 . .' ; ' a a } < Sy h � " _; , ` g; js -a • • + ' ; f - 'fib y ' f • y 4",, '` ,'f ^A • .4` *4 • 0l r .moi ' tlit 'r , r i µ r y a '� ,i iii'' M tea_.•,_ " ,{` „ ,1 ro 'irk ` r . ,,t, alli 1 . '4 I'',,;,,,, '4;yT.160 s !MEQ + } •'` F' a. r , s F +. i fes • . r . • Alli , y Y a Y — . 11' •• „:P *' # . * f. , • t '''' ....,•_,P . - -4 .. , •.. r 4 . •• :T...i.f...4. ... . 4.4 . . ?#• .. , . . I 1 A . . I` • • 4• ' • L . .4 . 4, r 1 P r • Alk.4 , • • . ik - .,...f 4,- , . .,,,,..„..1 4. , -. 4...., . 41. -4 ,,,, 1..034 4 ..lit„. , '• •,4•• .-", •t ,, esi, .- -, . - - .11.4 P I'.i, i m "it , , I,. . ' V ' t •' 1 .. -4 A To.. , ' .4. Pir,•.. • . .4"4 44 . 1 ' .44* ir- 11. • 1 - - , • ' •••••• . ._•ara , • 4 'le i'd41,1t4 ' , -P4 I .,,. r e.".... ..Y •. . - • .- , , . 44. "r4i.a. — • _, ,7144trrA 404 r f ON' itt ' '4. 4 , . ‘,74. ., . -' , , ir i• '. .., • i " • ar "i I° ' • iiiilliat „..„. ,,,j111.4141Mairm ' alel k .VAIMillia.' .. °° • • 4 111.• ' - 4444- '..'"14 - . . . - . )41.4..4 °'•'',74 - ' - ' + . 4.4 4 '44 ".• 1'1° ‘.°'''44 ' . .4.4% ....• - t t t, ' ' .1/4 ,4 .., O''' . -a , . ... ki •°., 44, ,- "4'41 •''....., '''• ,- , ..,.. 110 . ' ' ' '- - ... , ,.. , " . „. 4 2 '', '' '47 . ..,.. . ._ Drit, ..„•_ ,..„ st .. .pkir'4'a''', , __,...., - -.01,0 - eA:7**".''' . V.'''. .' 't NIP i • It ' ' " r41"' ''N'.'.— "- , • ,• - . ' '''''10" ''.« IC • . , • '441 P. fo- ' , .;,_----- .. 1' . - .„ • I. . .3., . - ',..1 , ..„.„ .41 ,,,„4, ..-P'• ..#-. -- -. , ... .tl,, , .4 k ' i SO ,,, . 7 ... , t... , ... .. _ ,..__ ,..., „. ,, 11 a! # ..-'' j# tr° •40.• :. .ke,, , •ir f.,rt '1 'a ' 4 ...,...1.' °' 94 -4i1",A, ii•g--1. - -• '' --2,.. 4")! . - - -7 •6`..t ." 44. -.1 - p ,o.,, ---kv., , ' j, it. # I r . ,04 r4 i f 4•"''441,44,b4 ',4 a .......I° . 47 .1 i „„+0 ,„. ., -”- , . 4,/ 1-r -5 ' :44 . '•... . ,, : . . 4•1! . . ., . - • t ° 1-*.4 05. :), --,. '• - *144-41 t „ '.4 V ..-°. . .ri,„.,, ,.c....,..7 tf ''• - . '-' t,. '''tk,'" . , 0.4. 4.. - iirot _ 4 . v 'lu • . 4 ; " • 1 li. ..,,,s• .. a.,11, 444 .1%. 4. P 410111 ... "1 1 \k 1,4 — . f 41.• , St. 1,4 0 r" - ' r. ,4 1, r -r, . .. '' .:, AIC I! 1 city () tilde MEMORANDUM Valley Physical Development Department 763-593-8095/763-593-8109(fax) Date: September 29, 2015 To: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals From: Melissa Sonnek, Planning Intern Subject: 5545 Golden Valley Road Paulette Belgrade, Applicant Paulette Belgarde, owner of the property at 5545 Golden Valley Road, is seeking a variance from the City Code for the addition of an office on to the existing single family home. The applicant is seeking a variance of 6.4 feet off of the required 12.5 feet to a distance of 6.1 feet from the (east) side yard property line. The applicant is proposing an addition on the east side of the home that is 6 feet wide and 7 feet long. The addition would increase the size of the home by 42 square feet. The applicant would like to build this addition on the east side of the home because buildable area is limited on the north, south, and west side of the home. The existing structure currently sits 12.1 feet from the (east) property line,therefore any addition to the east side of the home would require a variance. The proposal requires variances from the following sections of City Code: Section 11.21, Single Family Zoning District, Subd. 11(A)(3)(C) Side Yard Setback Requirements: The minimum side yard (east) setback requirement is 12.5 feet. The applicant is requesting a variance of 6.4 feet off of the required 12.5 feet to a distance of 6.1 feet at its closest point to the side yard (east) property line. Staff Recommendation: In reviewing this application, staff has maintained the points of examination to the considerations outlined in Minnesota State Statute 462.357, requiring that a property exhibit "practical difficulties" in order for a variance to be granted. Practical difficulties result in a use that is unreasonable, are based on a problem that is unique to the property, are not caused by the landowner, and do not alter the essential character of the locality. Due to the limited buildable area on this narrow lot, staff believes the homeowner to be in a unique situation and finds this variance request to be reasonable and consistent with the neighborhood character. Staff recommends approval of the request for a variance of 6.4 feet off of the required 12.5 feet to a distance of 6.1 feet at its closest point to the side yard (east) property line. 1500 1437 [ 1 5530\\I TiiII 5540 F I �I 5610 Subject Property 5630 It\\I 5700 Rd 1 41 5 AR5545 5605 i M Z a .i 561 5 N , 1 I 1325 11 2 5715 1324 O 2 u J 8 n ss '\\_____________ -' 1315 1316 10 4 1405 \ 7 1305 1310 12 i 1.1 1 3 y city ofivE r0 3 golden ,. SEP 0 8 2015 id valleyBY: Zoning Code Variance Application 1. Street address: ��r Y c` L V+ 1,1 2. Applicant Information: Name: if / ��L6 iz_pe / Nbtitt M / A.11.7 '., Vxe/c. Address: QD Email Address: fie- s 1 1 i/ 0 --b , £� ver'-r7 Phone Number: 6 / 2- - ' / 7 - 3. _3. Provide a detailed description of the variance(s) being requested: y C-,s 11.7 P✓J,1/ )Q C377-5- 7-td E /j /9/L i 711 TJ CON s l7Zii,/�/" /21- pv) D : Q y g 'Ft ®i ce g 114 P O&17- 4 r Tit N a/ r r, ty)S 7 ea F72 of 7 N h'o.ter F" ,-�y P/2,=ti rc--CT wok/ L j e r v/F c1 ,9 VV/z/ A N c e 7-0 of 7-M /3f7-- 8/ cj< 4. Provide a detailed description of need for a variance from the Zoning Code, including: • Description of building(s) • Description of proposed addition(s) • Description of proposed alteration(s) to property 77f6 ?moa Pa.31p1 eh nil Poor /0- 7We A/o 27rNE.457 (1".61zn/ Z of 1-716t1,5r ovi-! 8E C6tvS7l2(icft rd coi& vs/A/6_ �=/Z�r F-no,-iNG- , 7 ' 17' w/ b 6 'Fr C ev 4T` N . /. 4sN rT C/7- wit- G ar✓ S �� ,v G Lr aF v4/2 /4^1G-e- 5. Minnesota State Statute 462.357 requires that a property exhibit "practical difficulties" in order for a variance to be considered. Practical Difficulties: • result in a use that is reasonable. • are based on a problem that is unique to the property. • are not caused by the landowner. • do not alter the essential character of the locality. To demonstrate how your request will comply with Minnesota State Statute 462.357, please respond to the following questions: Explain the need for your variance request and how it will result in a reasonable use of the property. 7-4`E- /ifaTW/E - of vJSe-Woc wog/cS fNAME Amo Ait-e-D S SPtcC F AA/ d FF c. /3 ,`29/2.664,3 / s Pt, CE- / .3 C,v2 ✓'ri-e7 44-5-n) B" N�7L GH/ , 2TT /f AND c'Q v t� 4 V&'1 - -/ S rw,4 LI_ /°&-`72C ✓v 7-4 G OF P1?--6 P c7,72Ty What is unique about your property and how do you feel that it necessitates a variance? r .'L Pi? POs r-D Ail /v IS rhi Avec live c./AJ tbAir'Y�Ucr 5D41 1-6f- MEW- , 7`"/- E" A1Ov4F-5 CAA S77CbC7/c>AJ 41/1i-L A/b7 1-1--OW Vc To /0 DP 7-es e-4/d(7` oR 4,,L—.4 . ,'- '- Si- S /D -/Nr- Ok/ve'wAy. Explain how the need for a variance is based on circumstances that are not a result of a landowner action. ;---//b-- S/ z aF 7/'C ff b✓'i E ((iv/ D t hJ /N ? Po y'/a,t/ 761 lrv/ D7Ario� L,oT - /,,�/vim t /#O y /vis �� � L�rtL�7~D nl© /9-L G-o v, ,-v c ( /7-Al D 4 ,e9 lei j2.i•o AiCt- o M S /D f- 1,a 7 Explain how, if granted, the proposed variance will not alter the essential character of your neighborhood and Golden Valley as a whole. 0'L6c�M ✓VT 7F 4D1'l 71 &i ,'f ni oT C v r✓ cp/ e v oL4./4 J ) -s e k' / -M &✓P /91,W4brr1Yc T/C' 6/ f�vrl'✓� 7A/ C6n/5c�/an/ twA7'87ZIALS 1/5e 0 lv/Lt /YI4Tr/ ['_✓/22gni7 //4rYl{ 8 16 N 6. The City requests that you consider all available project options that are permitted by the Zoning Code prior to requesting a variance. The Board of Zoning Appeals will discuss alternative options to seeking variance with you at the public hearing. Please describe alternate ways to do your project that do not require variances to the Zoning Code. ry 6- i v rNt" /1 b TW L72 5 Poo c N 2" 7 /AM/2-K_ AT /V--On;'t -v 44vsy-- A-/) -ary , 71v ev22r47r S/ t.c (Y15vx6) /5 g7./t,G c/s&—D AT c'4P/Jcrii . �// /I 4s 7 C/f 1 LD/26---,t/ 4,A/ C2./Al 2E'W7 y /s C n'.4 t ( N 17A/ v7-it/ ZiAc-C- sf'Ne 7. Please submit a current survey of your property. You must indicate the proposed addition, including new proposed building and structure setbacks, on the survey. A copy of Golden Valley's survey requirements is available upon request. Please note that this application is considered incomplete without the submittal of a current property survey. 8. Please submit at least one current color photograph of the area affected by the proposed variance. You may attach a printed photograph to this application, or you may email a digital image to planning@goldenvalleymn.gov. You may submit additional photographs as needed. To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct. I also understand that unless construction of the action applicable to this variance request, if granted, is not taken within one year, the variance expires. I have considered all options afforded to me through the City's Zoning Code, and feel that there is no alternate way to achieve my objective except to seek a variance to zoning rules and regulations. I give permission for Golden Valley staff, as well as members of the Board of Zoning Appeals, to enter my property prior to the public hearing to inspect the area affected by this request. L Signature of Applicant If the applicant is not the owner of all property involved in this application, please name the owner of this property: L `TT t— C c),,,),Q,4€-RD(2aL6,„ Print Name of owner Signature of owner k $200 Application Fee Attached (for Single Family Residential) $300 Application Fee Attached (for all other Zoning Districts) Please note: The City of Golden Valley will send notice of your variance request to all adjoining property owners as well as owners of properties directly across streets or alleys. Your neighbors have the right to address the Board of Zoning Appeals at your public hearing. You are advised to personally contact your neighbors and explain your project to them prior to the public hearing. r r _ � t , ",,, r -'{ y, �j• _ qac ;�,; +. fiir •s.* J .,i f$ '.- ' -,i, :::e...IrAiii,47:1:11 f ' ' . . .,.6:0,..... ..,...„: , ,,,..:,_ iL. , :_,.._,,,,i.:,,,,.,:,,,,,,,::','':;',...1.,,,,.__'..-...'_, ...,::,..":"1., .',-,:4,,,‘: :::.....,..,„.',-.,‘,,, / .. . . .,;- . ,Tit I ' ' ,,al; :,, l':.::::'3.1:....,....:: -„,:,,,,_,,,,,,,F7",.-l:;',.'::f:',:'i4,7:' 14:,.',.....::,t'.- "4-..,-!/'-',:'; "r:.;, .11;' ,,sit`:--=:-.;-:::-,--'' 4 ,. t ..1-v-. SKr 1�rl♦ ' � +, f r'T t l � j • � `at . 46, ! t2 .�j n F r �. y ,. a1� . 4. 7�x*.',fie. P J ' . - ,, ,'. {� f / •> .' „ ,AV. • $ ); r IAC :F , om 4 s`iF # - a ` �" � 1- ,firr J' i f_ p t .,1 ... '14s-4* ' .°•,i4, '' .4'; ''. 1, 't,,. ,f. -.0#::, .,-,1 I , 0.gyp 4, 44 � it c. - 1`}4 a go, :coz-4,,,,e,,,,'.f-. .iiii:-:-:', v:Ai , ",.., - ••= : ,Y -i; �,\' 1 ♦ • .'r,: 4� �. ♦, - ,- . '‘\ ', .4-.,:,,,, .... Rya. • . s V 'St * ' t_ to ,t I._'4.s ',INN-1:f- sb :1" 1' . .- • • `` M - T, * , - vie " t!. t . r Mh'♦ Ili .• R - ` y 1 6//f/ 1p 4 a !f v 1 • 'y v/' I 4 „ ,k„ :ti: 14-48, .,i,f,,,t., 't i s i , ,,. 1. 1--\\-\\ "--\:, ..1\\ -\\L-- --,_,_,ft.'.'”, 1— 'r.:'‘: "(4.-'/.... A -. ':::-11::i.,,,_ ,-T..7 . . .,. .,,. \\\\\\ ' ' --3'1.6 1 4 .,, : ,4 vv. • 0 44.1..„.:,....::.!.:.:,.;-.:.,:_:-::.:.....:.: \NW M 4.. r .;.ate . *((,' { ,{ • a. %...W: = ' 1111111.1111.111.111111 Tg,, ,�� . ., f l, ' . ' -'t ...:.— ', : ',,:. YY t z d �•. \� : —- ' :Vql. ."*1:4.-' 'li'. - �{ t. t ,1.,-,afsy. 9 •fit r �. '•.A t�j 1 • s ,W K '`' �; ti c"' ' °� . t _ A �d 1 1 i w t4, gift • { .1 ti cokokka. � '1 • - fit- I; • ...ii, it . • .1. 4 itke, *Na, ., A, . ' 1 .v7 ,, L, . - ' ,, ) 'NO -----.._„,„_..„,....________ . '1 , ` * � - ..,. - i..-- i , h �, '. d n . •` ' II. fit t ' `t OA ► # -' 1 1.� tWid j r •. t S :runs B400p 047 sod Y 707 7,„0J 10 04/7003'.� I -\„.---sns u64pop.,' _ — — T _ .I �„ o4Ja0510.0°.°.a 3S*WO \ i 9' ..,9...1',1°7.14.d 00 i 107 7,^0.9 J0 04/1.1,3- I I 1010 ! s,c I a 141,, a lr 40.fano E4o0p 9Z u1774O tura 30 a/n79.1 8s d itge,ce. i 047 6400 04/,011P,,,,,24 047 5• 6400 1707 7,049 l0 04/ •••_ ^' 1 047 00%..M,1.911-. 7+'03.111 4770 N/P od 04/V'. I I `V M' o !,.m --19.6rd-- 1 ! -- - t.\ _r 3.61,11.00 N �i .• \� \ $1 . ci r 1 \ ti o 6uglam0 6ugs/x3 1 j .No V. \'- •\ `.I, a .D7 L M_ O i9l 4 \ �O\ jO r4 \ q09 ”" p oo; ya�od \ li ; � rS \ .9 •h q 0.J � \ aro4o 07/e rz _ s` I \ b .n.6'9 sairal 0.•so,' ,. --L9'60d-- 4 I 3„61,11.00 N r707L^ \ . to Of tuna&swop7O0 09 it C 0y7 64an 04/.(tpunop `-007707adu o, la/d.0d to 0M°0 0/vuy 5005 o017/PPY s d01N 10 04i /7073 9 017005 J°.00.00 3S 410744 044 607a 1707 7.007 l0 04-- / " 7003 047 4170/ypnd 04/Y g �y• cn R O hi °1111 111111 a. s aA 4 `� °illI! o r C7,�a a to o o0.ssZO 8a 1d t.°.. z $'� a o a V' PG 11'8:2 o wz0 .g':o 14 •°l il ..fi g,Aa g ,. , s 0q 0 0 0 kl e.e m 'm p a 11 g glee s: P l.°i t .' a 1 !y+�;.S. m a>i 5 e0. o., -°�Pa'° '9 a o 0 3 a '�'�i $' 8�.q ,a ,a°n Ty9 m 1 0.°G r� a O S iii9 o>•BBo,g.4 ! Uo3 A gi la 1p u i o�U yC q 2`53 (qi 'a or .NZ. .2O5°A `.^J�.g 6>'da °U s ° s QU C�. 00.77?00° o°r oEo1'So�1 $ �m �6 ..4.3 o,« rte..I'm VP o lAiiE -$ .oa °eo op`a1V1° rdU 3 p ao t� a 'y ,�qF° 3 g :9C a.�. > ;V° e..9g>y° xl l ea A4° a.�F° '` .r E o Qia a of 'a 71.2:e l.i g t t- ° v ci t 3 t1 01 4" � a rt .9.2.9 N.g. P COI. N z«qo $°z 58g16.1�a °°eir v a '' ads �4 3 p i g:4141� F° m'° a 9 p°iJ °ao $ a 01.51'4R.974 o As ry z O G7 rU*11.54"U'P° g PU4 o9g°g�' . ah 4o• osL'tw Nil 6f i0 6 >'. w 9 N U wgg g ao„ ma�«°o411141 oa U a > ' t11 ,102 Em`9 O'3w.a E. T1135ow ., 3`a >:.' �y a a g a!'g e' w:o°y, - .2Alg vtlgE- 7” 1 ='-in l ❑ya E yg�r m .. 1g5 a 2' E. Bf°3°m1 OU°'''. gr ) 41' o.a,' 0..R-go. > . t-is.° wg8,a 1 v v, J ,..) 2 �fl<4ax °n._:ma.a 3rio;<a�.9 Li 3 m�w 3.9- .9 0:: 3., .c /n= o U,.gn o m G studiobauen o 08b 21 2/1-001 .Z/I-6 •r :a M o 2/I-6 ,.8/£-L 08/1-5£ 0 a) 0 0 (o m a) a) 1) 0 0 a o w u• ) in w 4., II N C = ui N O � y studiobauen TZI -6 „Z/I-OOT �• „8b „Z/T-6 .8/£-S£ N - N N ,1 O „b/I-L L - rn 0 i0 N r-1 C O N O1 f0 c E ra C u) 0 U- o C -) 0 0>'> aa)) 0tc � � a) z 0 c ,- �0 Cru LI- N as c `- ,`^, mac = CO ID viu � i 'o O N e, CL) C a. -0 0 0 O olS a c ti z -o u 0 C a) f0 C O t0 > 4- 0Z.0 � Ln u_ O ,-i > - r-1 UJ >. )21- 0 �_ a� � i•-\1 (n Lr) u_ Co � •+ >.. n _ studiobauen ci U 0 (u c _ z=, 0 • c • -0 — • Li) 5 Cr-0 C C ° (0 0 a2 u_ 3Eiraimmiumm9ifigisigigari _ I IN • I I .1.11.11111.1111111.111 11..11.1.1.1111.1111111 IMMMINN op el Nfr N Lc; 01 ------------ ----------- studiobauen ,00L'£9 1j i1 lD up 00 N N: N N O O O cO co \ N a) N Q c0 Do CL 00L'£9 In 0 N In city of . , olden , MEMORAND Valley Physical Development Department 763-593-8095/763-593-8109(fax) Date: September 29, 2015 To: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals From: Melissa Sonnek, Planning Intern Subject: 1929 Glenwood Parkway Rick Wilson, Applicant Rick Wilson of Riverside Construction, representative of the owner of the property at 1929 Glenwood Parkway, has requested three variances from the City Code to rebuild an existing two- stall garage in order to make it larger. The current garage is 27.3 feet from the north property line. The applicant is seeking a variance of 1.7 feet off of the required rear yard setback of 25 feet to a distance of 23.3 feet from the rear yard (north) property line. The applicant is also seeking a variance of 8.5 feet off the required 12.5 feet to a distance of 4.0 feet at its closest point to the side yard (east) property line. The applicant is also seeking a variance from the side wall articulation requirements. The applicant is requesting to build a side (east) wall that would be 57.5 feet in length, which is 24.5 feet longer than the established 23 feet. Articulation is required when the side wall is longer than 32 feet. The property currently has a two-stall garage that is approximately 416 square feet and measures 20 feet wide by 20.8 feet deep. The applicant would like to extend the garage width by 4 feet to the north to better allow for the movement of two cars and to add a small amount of room for additional storage. As stated by the applicant, the parking and maneuvering of two cars inside the current garage can be challenging as it is very narrow. By constructing a new wider garage, the applicant would be better able to park both vehicles and have storage for personal items. This would increase the footprint of the garage by approximately 83.2 square feet. The proposal requires variances from the following sections of City Code: Section 11.21, Single Family Zoning District, Subd. 11(A)(2) Rear Yard Setback Requirements: The minimum rear yard (north) setback requirement is 25 feet. The applicant is requesting a variance of 1.7 feet off of the required 25 feet to a distance of 23.3 feet at its closest point to the rear yard (north) property line. Section 11.21, Single Family Zoning District, Subd. 11(A)(3)(C) Side Yard Requirements: The minimum side yard (east) setback requirement is 12.5 feet. The applicant is requesting a variance of 8.5 feet off the required 12.5 feet to a distance of 4.0 feet at its closest point to the side yard (east) property line. Section 11.21, Single Family Zoning District, Subd. 11(D) Side Wall Articulation Requirements: For any new construction, whether a house, addition, or replacement through a tear-down, any resulting side wall longer than 32 feet in length must be articulated, with a shift of at least 2 feet in depth, or at least 8 feet in length, for every 32 feet of wall. Staff Recommendation: In reviewing this application, staff has maintained the points of examination to the considerations outlined in Minnesota State Statute 462.357, requiring that a property exhibit "practical difficulties" in order for a variance to be granted. To constitute practical difficulties, the property owner must propose to use the property in a reasonable manner, the landowners' problem must be due to circumstances unique to the property not caused by the landowner, and that the variance, if granted, must not alter the essential character of the locality. Staff recognizes the existing difficulty of parking two vehicles in the current 20 foot wide garage and does not see the proposed additional 4 feet in width as a significant alteration of the character of the site or surrounding neighborhood. Due to the fact that surrounding homes also have two stall garages, staff finds the proposed addition to be reasonable. Staff recommends approval of the request for a variance of 1.7 feet off the required rear yard setback of 25 feet to a distance of 23.3 feet at its closest point to the rear yard (north) property line. Staff recommends approval of the request for a variance of 8.5 feet off the required side yard setback of 12.5 feet to a distance of 4 feet at its closest point to the side yard (east) property line. Staff recommends approval of the request for a variance from the required Side Wall Articulation to allow the side (east) wall of the property to be built to a maximum of 57.5 feet without articulation. g(e. �'j5�":' 3221 3223 2316 2309 0 c0' 3231 �4\ 1 2315 Z 2310 2303 I Gee 2322 a 2301 Y 2316 2309 c • rr z. > 2300 Z_ 2305 Q 2310 ,'A o 2323 a {}' r ��1 , x Subject Property: s`M,,ycP`" 2225 3115 I i 3121;: 2215 1 +1L e 4, i 3211 4 i4, I it p v 04 322 j 2200 2230' n. 19vtil 0.37 MCN e �D •i. ; 2225eD 1 *' Z 1915 i F i Q�' ; i ke od i a+ Nk`I 1 f i Nh'„ o- IV t's 0 4,,,0% i (t.' '' OodpKwl d F -----^ 1945 ? MINNEAPOLIS a L J L ir -T 153E 1 i !E __ \ 19301 - -----.---.r.-.--( \ 1 5301. _. ...7 rik f _Vacated Alley Q» Ef and disc /923 5 78.4 1 3 Found = 0— — _50.0 •r p235 ,,- round--01 \ 1N l t • n _0.--o- ----- C.i ----- ' 4.0 , Proposed -, _--- \ Addition4.0 `` 20.8. • __-- X20.8 -- U 41) ' `V 3 1 c U t O 5.9 3.6�' 'c' • O�q v 1 1 1 cS n I Z ff o'no N �' Dwelling u:, 18 Existing Existing �� 12.7' "1.7.4 0,j4.0 welling o 1 D 1 04 z ' 11 v ,cn w \\ 1 U C 1 o \ ' V \ t1 _ — I I t 1 Found 5� �- —50 00-- pod • 5,59 W i5Q2 ' Concrete Curb It Par kway ' � % Glenwood ___----- - Drw. No. 750909 TB city of iiviN golden , , valley Zoning Code Variance Application 1. Street address: /jOiF 2. Applicant Information: Name: 74.0104,../ Address: � got q J-,rev' S6 • /<'GAY JAS'3 ,J- Email Address: f 4s ' - 04 s ' - Ii Phone Number: (/,1 - _ 3. Provide a detailed description of the variance(s) being requested: L14.,ta-74, t,, c /_r .�o ' ‘04./, ly ,1 a ��✓f� d t✓.a.���i4s fd `on a- 4) ,.sd,E. /4 „Ja rota.ie 74440. �ad�iJ�� 11 ccs i� S �o�i��.., f4.1e ,,' a4 oG d "4.-- 14+e-, !✓G 412;I /I Ge- 4, e.-. 1-one? .114‘G detd le Ji,„' The, .r. . . q' dv 40"4. vi , .. 7'% t,,JJ e .,4#( If41.4e. "IeseireA / 6Y /O'` .+-s1 ke� PACe. P„te,4 ,r14e �'4...e G�ic'i�..�cG AT.'Ate /elf / a,P 4. Provide a detailed description.tof need for a variance from the Zoning Code, including: io' 1J' , • Description of building(s) • Description of proposed addition(s) • Description of proposed alteration(s)to property �ewa�r v eacAs-A9 ,o,'s�.�. am.-1 tapiAl At f ew,e. /C.4944.e ao tie,,., . K:ete 44/, ) m.�� ,LS' 40(I O /11 `.01A4rag� 6e-- clef Amy �cle `Amy ip ()V tarde e f,t ►t el w old `4. "AC D..- 4 ei GA(. 5. Minnesota State Statute 462.357 requires that a property exhibit "practical difficulties" in order for a variance to be considered. Practical Difficulties: • result in a use that is reasonable. • are based on a problem that is unique to the property. • are not caused by the landowner. • do not alter the essential character of the locality. To demonstrate how your request will comply with Minnesota State Statute 462.357, please respond to the following questions: Explain the need for your variance request and how it will result in a reasonable use of the property. Cd4...e 04 .r a .i'<c d0 (04 d o V.h Slc-e /j.. �s t A - 6!l.'►lsy. —ljG o2 S n, d'-G a. w...sQ� - s .44 tAle- Grotr a.aeus..'-+�.s c% tst T im / Jiv►y,G o�y"4' 4ie141d"Qj4w104--e eraa...s.(l._ 's4."surra-•04 04,404k P .or..,'iOfsK/i(e_ ✓Jew6•°- Aft.a.b,pQ 5 04.0. i✓d��, What is unique about your property and how do you feel that it necessitates a variance? 714- eee.ervel, e.g9a ,se 1J c s..ve.vf r opo 04 'f -rMsed�i "'�`3' /lc.e, 7"; agresi Itl / (1000-0° 4,./'1,71-4 Atte. ss.-. o�(Ma- 5vz& D ls4f 141-4- �i7� �iw..�O s s� t� p444• eS pt ha t 74Ae / G '("1oP"'" ,t 1 it, &. ..i fr x44,1 4.r If/ i r hov (4.4 o G / 74 At Explain how the need for a variance is based on circumstances that are not a result of a landowner actiop. . is' . 4.4Q ito f depecr4c./ 6y 04-2, 11e.+c,•+.,•.w. Explain how, if granted, the proposed variance will not alter the essential character of your neighborhood and Golden Valley as a whole. G S1le.. 4e 04C4P- ,J /od -4., o44 eec#'j 1. L /14-14 v sly 4 La!e J.o /r1 c L 6. The City requests that you consider all available project options that are permitted by the Zoning Code prior to requesting a variance. The Board of Zoning Appeals will discuss alternative options to seeking variance with you at the public hearing. Please describe alternate ways to do your project that do not require variances/ to the Zoning Code. / 4/e_ Gsr.�e� B. id 9/eiG, „y. 7n y4i� iae,�}G�i i%�'' d DIA c ,'j �..� .C..�. vis..-,c " ,°' 6 7. Please submit a current survey of your property. You must indicate the proposed addition, including new proposed building and structure setbacks, on the survey. A copy of Golden Valley's survey requirements is available upon request. Please note that this application is considered incomplete without the submittal of a current property survey. 8. Please submit at least one current color photograph of the area affected by the proposed variance. You may attach a printed photograph to this application, or you may email a digital image to planning@goldenvallevmn.gov. You may submit additional photographs as needed. To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct. I also understand that un!ess construction of the action applicable to this variance request, if granted, is not taken within one year,the variance expires. I have considered all options afforded to me through the City's Zoning Code, and feel that there is no alternate way to achieve my objective except to seek a variance to zoning rules and regulations. I give permission for Golden Valley staff, as well as members of the Board of Zoning Appeals,to enter my property prior to the public hearing to inspect the area affected by this request. Signature of Applicant If the applicant is not the owner of all property involved in this application, please name the owner of this property: 1 ( / 1, ( ( Z Print Name of owner Signature of owner 1 $200ipplication Fee Attached (for Single Family Residential) $300 Application Fee Attached (for all other Zoning Districts) Please note: The City of Golden Valley will send notice of your variance request to all adjoining property owners as well as owners of properties directly across streets or alleys. Your neighbors have the right to address the Board of Zoning Appeals at your public hearing. You are advised to personally contact your neighbors and explain your project to them prior to the public hearing. • , • ,414.3,11rheii : . 4 , r.r: • ‘, • +, 4t. •. V.1 • \C _ , • A 7 I • t •'• • f • • A • , ' • {f.' 412y • t ,17 • • • • . - " .; !4* • • ., • . . . -24 .',, ..._:,•- ,-„. --,v;-,At7 ;41 ., ' ','",-."'.',.• ',. .',i'.-".''-1,.• ••• • ' 0 : „WO• ' •% — • s • V: . • .• ,. '.. •• ;,S. 1$ • t st t IV ,• "• ,' • ..• • ... •i .., A • • *41/4 ' ?.. iliZ • ' '51.''.* • '''.4 Wit's - ___ ' ', -.•, ''' ‘.. ,.''',41.',. •' ' t."'" I... _ ` .4 • t; -..:- ' ..2-44,- , ,,;f. ,.. S.44:: '5 4; ' 1, °.‘: 4". ; 1•*i'. 0..fl•"`‘ ". ''''rt .2 -- .,..,V0,,, "" ' ' -' - t.$1'"'0• ' 'c•s' t ° .. - sl, ._.. —. - 14 • .:=Ei, . , • . • . • ' „,., ,,ot • . _ , - - - ,.. ----..--.. tib•- . : ..., ., - . ,, .s - t.s. ..-.4,t .5 , ,. • . . .... .__ _ \ .p . ) , . . .._ ...._ . ..... • • . --ii , • . , ,, - „,. • A ,4it'tP '' ,........ P. .. ,..441, . • .. ,„• .P • 1.41, • 41S.i” . A .101 ,c . 4;4. • .. 4. .., -04,, ,..... . ,t,,+, ,.. , • .1. , \ 0 - `t ' ' • .. .t .••• •..). •--•••;*: ..... ''' ' ' 1.• %. - .;• •5.;' 4 .4 or 5;.S,•.. ..i.v ..,.. Iit.- ‘ • . . i• . 4. . ,•0 gli • 5Y ' • . ' •''„,1 , ---.. . . , . ' POP ii . • . . . Or pt. A .• r , .. , 7:,"„, . r•4 v.': •Iwar.or—4 4 t...... t V • •It ,.• 14- • _a-444 1 . 4144444.:..* • 4 ,..., • S . ' ...... .....,• •,,,,p' ' ' :1 * .'. VW V'''''1” • 44‘.:1 t.4" : Priffiffirellir •. • ...ill : ' 0 . I li. ,--410IMIIMMIIMIMiiiiilli mets • 0 ,,, I '45' q, . .— i .. 4 , :•4 .P ' "' -.4wo--..odo. - .. . • •', „, - - - ..,, . ._._ ., 1 -111111111111111 • - -.;'NOW . ., _ , -4#' . • ,„ , ,i,„.-4- •-- / , — - ,... - - - , 4.1 -• _ f •'.! :ft?.%•;- . 111//1111 I I 1 1 1 .--"!''''.'.-At:-'.7' 40160-"..:-, '. • *-•• 4, s•-• -vv.'''. . •16114,V1"44011Prw -, -,.. _aitlfgril --- -....... ---- ., . • , • . , I 5 1 5 ''',,,,,,1 .,,. 1 , ,,, ,, i1 i•••••1,., '• ;''5• 44 " . \ 7' -' -;•7.•••,-37-".."41r-•-----tF"-.....-: --------- • , t 1 ''' ••',, / — - ,,,_ t ! . , • , „; • .11 - • ; ' .—7, ,. 1 ' ':.,,-..,; i, , ,. ,.. , 10,,, , 1 1 • —IN:0e. , , . ' - ......,...._..., 00,...,4; , . ., , . ! 1 • _.. •° lati44 . • 3 .---, ), . w 4..„,. ...,• • . „..,,,,i,olist4 -- -. 1 i ' v- • • t - • , . 1 ' Az- ' . • • i' -A, • -.'-'4" -411417",- --- -- ,.../ .„..... , , .. V , ar ..,.... . .. ,.. „......,, - • .._, T- - ..A.,,,,,... _ 4 , , . . f t A 470-- ..., . T ' Si' — k ' :4f 5, ,'A t ••,, 1, 41( di , ' i 't '1 I ,... - ' - - 1 1 t: :' - - ".0.-...4.,. --.c.„ '0 .,;::: , . . city of xn goldeni , valley Physical Development Department 763-593-8095/763-593-8109(fax) Date: September 29, 2015 To: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals From: Melissa Sonnek, Planning Intern Subject: 408 Natchez Ave South Chris Miller, Applicant Chris Miller, owner of the property at 408 Natchez Ave 5, is seeking a variance from the City Code to create an additional stall to his existing one-stall garage and to add on to the home behind the garage creating a new master bedroom and bathroom. The applicant is seeking a variance of 7.1 feet off the required side yard setback of 12.5 feet to a distance of 5.4 feet from the side yard (south) property line. The existing garage is currently 17.4 feet from the south property line. In order to create a functional second stall, the garage would need to be expanded by 12 feet to the south, resulting in the structure being located 5.4 from the property line. The applicant would also like to construct a master bedroom and bathroom addition behind the garage. While it would be set back two feet further from the side property line compared to the garage addition in order to fulfill the side wall articulation requirements, it would still encroach into the side setback area. A separate variance is not needed for this addition if built in conjunction with the garage addition, as the garage would establish the point closest to the property line. The existing home is built on the south side of the property, closer to the south property line than to the north property line. The applicant notes that his home is one of a small number of houses on the block with a one-stall garage. A visual inspection of the street suggests that this is correct, with a majority of the homes having two garage stalls. The added space will allow the applicant to park their car in the garage as opposed to in the driveway and allow for some additional storage. The proposal requires variances from the following section of City Code: Section 11.21, Single Family Zoning District, Subd. 11(A)(3) Side Yard Setback Requirements: The minimum side yard (south) setback requirement is 12.5 feet. The applicant is requesting a variance of 7.1 feet off of the required 12.5 feet to a distance of 5.4 feet at its closest point to the side yard (south) property line. Staff Recommendation: In reviewing this application, staff has maintained the points of examination to the considerations outlined in Minnesota State Statute 462.357, requiring that a property exhibit "practical difficulties" in order for a variance to be granted. To constitute practical difficulties, the property owner must propose to use the property in a reasonable manner, the landowners' problem must be due to circumstances unique to the property not caused by the landowner, and that the variance, if granted, must not alter the essential character of the locality. City staff recognizes that the area on this property in which a second garage stall could be constructed is very limited due to the location of the existing home on the lot. Staff believes a second garage stall addition to a one-stall garage is a reasonable use for this property. The home was constructed on the lot closer to the south property line that to the north property line, with the existing garage to the south. The current owner did not build the home and is constrained by its location on the lot. Staff finds that these additions would not compromise the essential character of the locality. Staff recommends approval of the request for a variance of 7.1 feet off of the required 12.5 feet to a distance of 5.4 feet at its closest point to the side yard (south) property line for a garage and house addition. \ - 217 309 308 31 7 ' ti 315 Subject Property 4540 \\ T17 1 400 Il 4541 aos aos la 433 \\ 416 f N d m iJ Q SOt \ `' 4c L O� 0 501 508 c S 'o Z Z N 1 515 4530 O p 551 \\S 518 0 603 601 604 z v \. 4646 // I w 609 / y 614 4640 co N ' \ii / ------- 4,Co' kV 41f_,=_: 4720 4700 B. H. BRADLEY j;,/rvey fr • Ail/i//,',/,-,-.61re y CIVIL ENGINEER AND SURVEYOR 3829 24TH AVENUE SOUTH y MINNEAPOLIS 6 MINN. 74-, /13-ricc 8/..44-4 40? DREXEL 2169 ... .0 if ....-7.:.;0 ‘....r • , / dieti•I e fiiPtilkilliv//4 AVIA, ,I' et.11,7) e 7,4 4.0 4 444,efirale-141,19#4 eve- •.k:e•-ftl 7`, '"?0(414 frriiii,..,-k— i ... _ 4C+$44 --r 1 - ...,. . if/44 4 I i 4.7 1t, PI i ‘)) '‘t ; t tkj, 144 I 'I'ir 1•44 1 .. t <1 4. ....,•-..-*-004 '-4 It 1 .-.... -i • , 8 14-woeurrei ti tki `'' it '..... q'Te:" et4fIL. 41 t1/4 : t.. , 4,0 „Af;•.• , ,,,, 1 il't. , 07- , I 1 - a -1 IV : / \ IN -... 44'5? 547. , I he,r by cei-/ex 7‘,4(7/ 1/1/..$ ifs a hwzre ev/id cormcl pkIefei1/4.1twIty el/4 fr/kwAyy rkx PY6eri frorrel el Avid: • Ixfpli/ii/i.9 E./1 et pe.-,/,11 tyi /he 4.7.5%4 ,/,/iiit* oil.,,:,! , NE* r/Me 4/4/14 eye ,..Szel/ey, ,Y0, 7-4V2 A.'k4-e-A.1.4 ?eNtAicepo Jew,"/1 i frev 79.t. /ite. 4 C',71C/" 1 .40 rrcyi " 4-/X.t. 146-77(our/Xi/wd4 6c /144- ge...mid/YE„*.(-1,N if/A ri ek)boxc eye. 2.4f.6 alb<le..07rter c),-'04,4' 7i, ("Aky/..94 el,)r, ..1.747,7,7/ ;"Atc r-/rriiori/44,,, r7 Ar/i!Pr '.??*re.A,k`,/, of:71c. 6irt4 4ic f,e/ '' ,31,i-(./ 144...v 4 t-.1,4 /4. 45',-/a/AvIe ef-wriri./Y4,y4 5"."4.917,4-:‘ if, ,:1-e 1,..i!'sefiqd c,/,. .*' ñ', 4/ -nii Ac twit"'/ *'/45? ,., if'C-r.-147/#:Cr ..57',)7/ %'4fre ç7"„raid . p tyre.,,v/iyille d• Vetrl(-1/4-wei- (4...re-/->6er/hie '2/.', 97 el.tkoc4 .64..”.7 I t r, ar;ii71 e...ei !'''').0 ..4#'J, 711/k e-"-joie/ .4/E 4 al.4.1#1' e-/ /o4, 174.0,1 1. ,.) ,/ii/5 er'/-'k' 7e fee-"i 71e, /oci.6,;I e f je 7,./.,44,,e;)9 Cr...'rap II r-ei,t7r/ Ci..5j°,1"-yei y 4 fl 4I , 5C 44.*:•./.1C//y eV-,Vormir.e. i 94? ADVANCE SURVEYING & ENGINEERING CO. 5300 Highway 101 Minnetonka, MN 55345 Phone (952) 474 7964 www.advsur.com Friday, September 18, 2015 Job Address: 408 Natchez Avenue South, Golden Valley, MN 55416 Scope of work: To establish and/or re-establish the south corners of said parcel and determine the distance from the south corners of the existing garage and the south property line. The City Of Golden Valley jzimmerman@goldenvalleymn.gov At your request, we verified existing monuments and/or replaced them, as necessary, at the south corners of the property above. We certify that the southwest corner of the garage is 17.4 feet from the south property line. We certify that the southeast corner of the garage is 17.5 feet from the south property line. The scope of our services did not include preparation of a drawing or locating improvements and/or encroachments, if any, on the property. This is to certify that this work was done by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a licensed Professional Land Surveyor under the Laws of the State of Minnesota. Thank you for using our firm. Sincerely, `iet fasted V i. James H. Parker P.E. & P.L.S.No. 9235, President ty of goCitF 2015 valley BY: LI Zoning Code Variance Application 1. Street address: 408 Natchez Avenue South 2. Applicant Information: Name: Chris Miller Address: 408 Natchez Avenue South Golden Valley, MN 55416 Email Address: millerc@visi.com & chris.miller@vce.com Phone Number: Cell—612-804-9387 3. Provide a detailed description of the variance(s) being requested: Looking to add a second garage space to an existing one car attached garage and a master bedroom behind the garage. This will require a variance to build five feet from the southern property line 4. Provide a detailed description of need for a variance from the Zoning Code, including: • Description of building(s) • Description of proposed addition(s) • Description of proposed alteration(s)to property Single family home of just under 1,500 square feet on main level of a rambler style house. Add a garage space to the existing one car garage. Existing garage is attached to the home and is the original one car garage. Behind the existing and to be added garage space we would propose to build a master bedroom and bath. The western wall of the house (backyard) would be extended out six feet to increase kitchen and entertaining area of the main floor 5. Minnesota State Statute 462.357 requires that a property exhibit "practical difficulties" in order for a variance to be considered. Practical Difficulties: • result in a use that is reasonable. • are based on a problem that is unique to the property. • are not caused by the landowner. • do not alter the essential character of the locality. To demonstrate how your request will comply with Minnesota State Statute 462.357, please respond to the following questions: Explain the need for your variance request and how it will result in a reasonable use of the property. The variance request would allow us to add an additional garage space resulting in a two-car garage. This would provide more storage and allow us to park both cars in the garage. The addition would not change the character of the house as the only visable change from the street view would be the added garage space. What is unique about your property and how do you feel that it necessitates a variance? The property is a narrow lot but long as it totals just under a 1/2 acre. It is unique in the neighborhood in that it is one of only several homes that has a one car garage. Explain how the need for a variance is based on circumstances that are not a result of a landowner action. In October of 2004 I acquired the home and have not done any structural changes to the house. When I acquired the house it was only for myself but now there are two adults living there and we would like to extend the garage so that we can both park in the garage and have an entrance from the garage into the house. Explain how, if granted,the proposed variance will not alter the essential character of your neighborhood and Golden Valley as a whole. The house is the smallest house in the neighborhood where other homes are well over 3,000 sq/ft. The character of the home from the street would not change except for the additional garage space. The North Tyrol neighborhood can support houses that range in price from 400k to 1.2 million and above. This addition would bring the house value to roughly 500k up from 300k today. 6. The City requests that you consider all available project options that are permitted by the Zoning Code prior to requesting a variance. The Board of Zoning Appeals will discuss alternative options to seeking variance with you at the public hearing. Please describe alternate ways to do your project that do not require variances to the Zoning Code. The alternative would be to build a 11/2 car wide garage and extend it to be a tandem garage with one car parked in front of the other. Doing this would not allow for a master suite to be added as the space for that would be consumed by the tandem garage. 7. Please submit a current survey of your property. You must indicate the proposed addition, including new proposed building and structure setbacks, on the survey. A copy of Golden Valley's survey requirements is available upon request. Please note that this application is considered incomplete without the submittal of a current property survey. 8. Please submit at least one current color photograph of the area affected by the proposed variance. You may attach a printed photograph to this application, or you may email a digital image to planning@goldenvalleymn.gov. You may submit additional photographs as needed. To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct. I also understand that unless construction of the action applicable to this variance request, if granted, is not taken within one year, the variance expires. I have considered all options afforded to me through the City's Zoning Code, and feel that there is no alternate way to achieve my objective except to seek a variance to zoning rules and regulations. I give permission for Golden Valley staff, as well as members of the Board of Zoning Appeals,to enter my property prior to the public hearing to inspect the area affected by this request. Signature of Applicant If the applicant is not the owner of all property involved in this application, please name the owner of this property: h/N,'5 lel:iii-ef` Print Name of owner Signature of owner $200 Application Fee Attached (for Single Family Residential) $300 Application Fee Attached (for all other Zoning Districts) Please note: The City of Golden Valley will send notice of your variance request to all adjoining property owners as well as owners of properties directly across streets or alleys. Your neighbors have the right to address the Board of Zoning Appeals at your public hearing. You are advised to personally contact your neighbors and explain your project to them prior to the public hearing. f, j 1. , I t'.'' It'.'.1 t',..it LI', .,.'''.it :ti,': tPlt ' ' , '' , i t I I, 4,,v-tr. 1 1111.,i 1 I ,. , : , , tl`j4*„..,,„ir 4,... , .. . t)05:15„,,,,:.' ' . .. - . ,. ...- I ., f ., ., :''.‘.-- \ ' •Rit . .....,, .11,1 ot' ,14,03....7, ..4.446 „ °R. ., k itAllhi - , \ ;`.\ '.11111 m iiiiiri, `�. , : ., � .� , _1 { 4 '' i -rpm , $ � ! .`� { 'rte. 411 C. a i • 1Jt .03; . 3 • •'' -....i.......- - 33- .... lig'it- • 1N‘ ••• / - II J1> , • •S• c r ' - •/1' s, le 4 r,• l e 1 , w ab - c A . ., .,,, ` , m' i , , • •Lf Ory _ - ..•.!`'Cf 'r, f ,fir' �• r+ I..t• r, r�1 ` i • ';'''-"- 1::--..-3:.:•4-4 •%-.'"M.r.C.-- • !, •'. ; • , \ /i • • .V Ai •s r, -S A1C•. , ti+� • 7 • \• . ' iii .:t 'A \4. .14? *z {g { rs _ ter. 4r � 1t ' '° } 1 " r1 dr. M .. !! . .es.. �, xs tit 1. - 0 , __ail • ''' " : '''' '',! 0 ' ' . . ;It .: '%\ A ' -, ', ,i'..; •!' 04 ,. , i:L.l*t, ii,• , 1'..' )44•I ' ' 4k ..\s, . Aii ' '44 kj vf 11 int, , , 4 , .-. 4 ' t \ IF , 4 4 4,,, 1 A , _ __ $ , ,,14,..•L/ t„- 41 . .‘ A 1!f 011 •# N In. , . • •% it . 1: _ . . , • 1 t: N - s.Akilt • . ka illilit;i, ., i,'•MO r \ IN‘, ' s o• ...,47r i .. 1 • t‘ ' s_ : • ,* , 7 if * ' —. iik ' • s % 4.• . 4 4 > . ,,lit ,',,i• . NI •\ It , . )1). slit• .*4",.4t.;144101.1H1 , .,, • . , •, _„, 4I ( ,0,„,,i ‘• ,4 . ., , 40 4-: 4 •• II 1 ilik , ' '.111' ,vt„'"'-•'*"* , . . t i .; it '",ifift, ' • , ‘.. ,., . ..# ' • , 14 , • '1.) ' i ,•,) r'I' 'tit ; • .. i. „ ..., • : . ,, I t \ `. • 4 4, ,....... , . 4 I . ..-. . ,, ., , 4' , • ...,..-4.'- ,AAIIIIIMIIIIIIMIIIIINIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIWA -. ..•''' , Ir , • ' * 11111111111111111111Ili i . .. "4.-. 4__ s' .. • - . ,. '''''''' ... ' I ' •... 1 An '•45 .' 1 ,,,.' ' Milk — I 4 INIMMENN ;I:. -i. . iminiummi b• " / . - Ntreferesimmic -,.. / , • I , , ii. , . . I J , . • i a. .. • . , ; 1M1NNINIMIMIIIIIIIIIIIIIh . 11 1 1 . i . Nt ]‘‘‘ 414k WI r ' 1 ) i 4 Ilia / I. o ', • • ,• t ' ,e......— ' . 'A , .,... . , I' HI 'N;rrt A!/ ! ;ai l *,t <-i�4 's.`.� . +�.. 11_ tsit. .44i iiiiiimmin 1 1 1 ... , .., fly�(+' ,. "• ' .� ^ - 41 t fi ii.,i I I I r I i ,, ,.. . ,..„. . ', c Ci. [ I . ../. )r . ' ` � �'' #00,;#4'.4-...A...#;.,-; ,,=.fir 4! ( e • •f 4-t, \ ..\ r ""`'rsM.- • J .� ) 411It • •.' ' ilifit'''441441ori.„ • 4. , \ t"te. .fit ^- ,; ,. j •`, j �/ �~ { • 1 (.V 111 ts: - : e " 1„4_,......, . titik L. I 'e• 4 . _ . .. . . ,. J • 4........e. ,.*.: . , •• , . ,;iiit.., .,.. , , ," ` . - • • � N 411r4.944. 1 , + ` � Y ; • K • . +Myr, �� alQ + •• . '' �fq illi +.. --c •f j•• •• E. ,{;, '�. � - ',T'' • • .1 re. • o . 111):14." ' -"*i• ,"4mox- o '{ 101•,-. • r t