Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
10-27-15 BZA Agenda
Board of Zoning Appeals Regular Meeting Tuesday, October 27, 2015 7 pm 7800 Golden Valley Road Council Chambers I. Approval of Minutes — September 29, 2015 Regular Meeting Il. The Petition(s) are: 5605 Woodstock Avenue Nate & Dana Isder, Applicants Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Single Family Zoning District, Subd. 12(E) Accessory Structure Requirements • 339 sq. ft. more than the allowed 1,000 square feet of accessory structure space for a total of 1,339 square feet of accessory structure space. Purpose: To allow for the construction of new garage (975 sq. ft.) and an existing shed (364 sq. ft.). 4301 Woodstock Avenue Gonvea Homes, Applicant Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Single Family Zoning District, Subd- 11 (A)(1) ubd.11(A)(1) Front Yard Setback Requirements • 4.9 ft. off of the required 35 ft. to a distance of 30.1 ft. at its closest point to the front yard (east) property line. Purpose: To allow for the construction of a new home. 2601 Noble Avenue North Independent School District #281, Applicant Request: Waiver from Section 11.46, Institutional Zoning District, Subd. 7 Yard Requirements • 20 ft. off of the required 50 ft. to a distance of 30 ft. at its closest point to the side yard (south) property line. Purpose: To allow for the construction of an addition on the south end of the existing building. 1319 Tyrol Trail Dan & Sheila Broughton, Applicants Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Single Family Zoning District, Subd. 11(A)(1) Front Yard Setback Requirements 12.1 ft. off of the required 35 ft. to a distance of 22.9 ft. at its closest point to the front yard (west) property line. Purpose: To allow for the construction of a porch addition. Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Single Family Zoning District, Subd. 11(A)(3) Side Yard Setback Requirements 1 ft. off of the required 15 ft. to a distance of 14 ft. at its closest point to the side yard (south) property line. Purpose: To allow for the construction of a porch addition. 3107 Lee Avenue North Joshua A. Counihan, Applicant Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Single Family Zoning District, Subd. 11(A)(2) Front Yard Setback Requirements 1.33 ft. off of the required 35 ft. to a distance of 33.67 ft. at its closest point to the front yard (east) property line. Purpose: To allow for the construction of a new garage. Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Single Family Zoning District, Subd. 11(A)(3)(a) Side Yard Setback Requirements • 7.74 ft. off of the required 15 ft. to a distance of 7.26 ft. at its closest point to the side yard (south) property line. Purpose: To allow for the construction of a new garage. Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Single Family Zoning District, Subd. 11(D) Side Wall Articulation Requirements City Code requires any wall longer than 32 feet in length to be articulated. The applicant is asking that the proposed new south wall of the garage be 36 feet in length without articulation. III. Other Business IV. Adjournment This document is available in alternate formats upon a 72 -hour request. Please call 763-593-8006 (TTY: 763-593-3968) to make a request. Examples of alternate formats may include large print, electronic, Braille, audiocassette, etc. 6 Minutes of a Regular Meeting of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals September 29, 2015 A regular meeting of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals was held on Tuesday, September 29, 2015, at City Hall, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. Chair Perich called the meeting to order at 7:05 pm. Those present were Members Maxwell (arrived at 7:15), Nelson, Orenst6in Perich 'arid Planning Commission Representative Blum. Also present were Ass!`ciatefi�Ipnner/Grant Writer Emily Goellner, and Administrative Assistant Lisa Wittmaq,. I. Approval of Minutes — August 25, 2015 Regular Meeting MOVED by Nelson, seconded by Perich and motion carried' unanimpusly to approve the August 25, 2015, minutes as submitted. Blum abstaihe�d from v6fing:,, II. The Petition(s) are: 3235 Kyle Avenue North Dennis K. Dienst, Applicant Request: Waiver from SOO' on 1r.� 21, S' In Family Zoning District, Subd. 11(A)(1) Front Yard Requit6mer is • 3.41 ft. off of the required 35 f lto a distance of 31.59 ft. at its closest point to the front yard (east) prclperty line. s, r,lt0e construction of a front porch/entryway addition. Purpose: To allow f Goellner referred toia surrey of the property and explained the applicant's request to construe foot porch/entryway addition on the front of their home. The proposed;pddition would'be located 31.59 feet away from the east property line rather than the required 315 feet. She added that staff is recommending approval of the requested variance' finding that this small addition would not compromise the essential character of the locality and it is a reasonable location on the home for an entryway. Dennis Dienst, Applicant, explained that their existing front entryway is only 8 square feet in size and it opens right into the living room. He added that they also have a fireplace right by the front entry that they aren't able to use because of the wind that comes in from the front door. Perich opened the public hearing. Hearing and seeing no one wishing to speak, Perich closed the public hearing. Nelson noted that there are other houses located on Kyle Avenue that are closer to the front property line than the required 35 feet. She stated that normally the Board is very Minutes of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals September 29, 2015 Page 2 sensitive to front yard setback requirements, but this proposal will improve the look of the house and it meets all of the criteria the Board considers when granting variances. The Board agreed. MOVED by Nelson, seconded by Blum and motion carried unanimously to approve the variance request for 3.41 ft. off of the required 35 ft. to a distance of 31.59 ft, at its closest point to the front yard (east) property line to allow for the construction of a front porch/entryway addition. 5545 Golden Valley Road Paulette Belaarde, Applicant Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Single Family Toni g I (§tricSv, 11(A)(3)(C) Side Yard Requirements • 6.4 ft. off of the required 12.5 ft. to a distance ofiQ.,1 ft. at its closest point to the side yard (east) property line. Purpose: To allow for the construction of a home office addition. Goellner referred to a survey of the property and explai d, the applicant's request to construct a 6 ft. x 7 ft. addition on the nortast corner of the house. She stated that the applicants have said their unique circum rtpes are that there is a limited area on which to build, there is a steep slope and ke d�riVew' on the other side of the house, and there are large trees in the rear yard She,stated that staff is recommending approval of the requested variance as it will n0fdompr6mise the essential character of the locality. Perich asked if the existing'fenmalong the east side of the property is on the property line. Goellner said shp,,elieveo. 7 � Blum asked if the property niaxt4odr to the east (1415 Lilac Drive) is a business use. Goellner said yes,and added that the property to the south is also zoned Business and Professional, Off. ices: Maxwell asked if the property is also unique because of its oblong shape. Goellner said yes and stated that it is also a steep and narrow property. Nelson questi tied if the proposed location of the addition is really the only place to build an addition.!'oellner said yes, the front east corner or the back east corner of the house are really to the only places to add anything onto the house. Kevin Vereecke, Studio Bauen, stated that the homeowner has seven children and every inch of the home is utilized. He reiterated that they can't build on the west side of the house because of the driveway and stated that the proposed addition won't affect the aesthetics of the area. He added that the neighboring property owners have said the proposal is ok with them. He referred to the existing fence along the east property line and confirmed that it is located right on the property line. Minutes of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals September 29, 2015 Page 3 Perich opened the public hearing. Seeing and hearing no one wishing to comment, Perich closed the public hearing. Orenstein said he is supportive of the variance because it seems like a minimal request and it borders an office building. Nelson agreed and added that there are also unique circumstances regarding the grade and the narrowness of the lot. MOVED by Maxwell, seconded by Perich and motion carried unanimously t9,approve a variance for 6.4 ft. off of the required 12.5 ft. to a distance of 6.1 ft. at its cl-st point to the side yard (east) property line to allow for the construction of a home office addition r 1929 Glenwood Parkway Rick Wilson, Riverside Construction, Applicant Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Single Family Zo' ningstrict, Subd. 11(A)(3)(C) Side Yard Requirements • 8.5 ft. off of the required 12.5 ft. to a disnce of 4 ft. atit'sclosest point to the side yard (east) property line. ,o Purpose: To allow for the construction of'e garage a' clition. Request: Waiver from Sectjpn!,, 1 21.j�9ing16t6mily Zoning District, Subd. 11(A)(2) Rear Yard Requirdmen* °10H, • 1.7 ft. off of the requiri 25 ftAo a distance of 23.3 ft. at its closest point to the rear yard (north propertline - Purpose: To allow for the construction of a garage addition. Request: Waive frO Section 11.21, Single Family Zoning District, Subd. 11(D) Side Wall Articu`iatron Requirements + Cty:Code reires any wall longer than 32 feet in length to be articulated. The applicant is asking that the proposed new east wall be 57.5 feet in length without articulation. Goellner referred to the survey of the property and explained the applicant's request to remove thcir�ezisting garage and replace it with a new two -stall garage that will measure 24 ft. x 20.8 ft. in size. The current garage is 20 ft. x 20.8 ft. in size. She explained that the proposed new garage would be 23.3 feet from the rear yard property line, rather than the required 25 feet, 4 feet from the side yard property line, rather than the required 12.5 feet, in order to follow the same plane as the east wall of the house, and would create a wall that would be 57.5 in length without articulation. Minutes of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals September 29, 2015 Page 4 Perich asked about the size of a typical two -stall garage. Goellner said a typical two -stall garage is anywhere between 20 ft. x 20 ft. to 24 ft. x 24 ft. in size. Nelson noted that the proposed garage will be the size of a standard two -stall garage. Rick Wilson, Riverside Construction, representing the homeowner, explained that the homeowners want to have a 24 ft. x 24 ft. wide garage. He said he doesn't think it is unreasonable to match the existing plane of the east side of the house, and that the requested variances will allow the homeowner to use the garage space more reasonably. Perich opened the public hearing. Seeing and hearing no one wishing bomments Perich closed the public hearing. J Maxwell said there are number of unique circumstances and features with, the property and the request is reasonable. He added that it doesn't make sens$,to artidulate the last two feet of the proposed new garage. The Board agreed.'' t MOVED by Maxwell, seconded by Nelson, and motion carried unanimously to approve the following variance requests: • 8.5 ft. off of the required 12.5 ft. to a distance of,4 ft. at its closest point to the side yard (east) property line to allow for the constructipn ofipi,aale addition. • 1.7 ft. off of the required 25 ft. to aAistart9016fZIJ3ft at its closest point to the rear yard (north) property line to allow for=the cogstri ion of a garage addition. • The proposed new east altisallowe#d to be 57.5 feet in length without articulation. 408 Natchez Avenue $oath Chris Miller, Applicant Request: Waiver from dtion 11.21, Single Family Zoning District, Subd. 11(A)(3)(b) Side Yard Requirements e 0,71A off of the required 12.5 ft. to a distance of 5.4 ft. at its closest point to the side yard (east) property line. Purpose; To allow for the construction of a garage/home addition. Goellner referred to a survey of the property and explained the applicant's request to construct a second garage stall with living space behind it, onto the existing one -stall garage. She stated that the applicant has said his unique circumstances include that the garage side of the house was built closer to the south property line, and that his house is one of the only homes in the area with a one -stall garage. Perich asked when the home was built. Chris Miller, Applicant, said the home was built in 1952. Minutes of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals September 29, 2015 Page 5 Perich asked if the house on the lot to the south is too close to side yard property line. Goellner said she didn't know, and that the side yard setback requirement depends on the width of the lot, but it does appear to be close to the property line as well. Blum questioned why the proposed addition behind the garage doesn't require a variance. Goellner explained that variances are given for a structures closest point to the property line. She added that the addition behind the garage would be further away from the side yard property line than the garage in order to meet the articulation requirement. Miller explained his request to add a second garage stall. He stated tha#;the neighbpr to the south was concerned about this proposed addition so he offered to ext d the tree line along the property line in order to provide screening. I Perich opened the public hearing. Seeing and hearing no one;u�uis ingAo comment, Perich closed the public hearing. { Nelson stated that she is typically in favor of grating yargOncos_in order to construct a second garage stall. Maxwell stated that a two -stall garage would be more in character with the houses in the area. The Board agreed.�,1 MOVED by Maxwell, seconded by Nelsgn'6n0 motion carried unanimously to approve the variance request for 7.1 ft. off of the required° 42.5 ft. to a distance of 5.4 ft. at its closest point to the side yard (east) property line to allow for the construction of a garage/home addition. " III. Other Business No other business was discussed. x, IV. Adjournment i}A The meeting�*as adjourned at 7:38 pm. David Perich, Chair Lisa Wittman, Administrative Assistant Date: October 27, 2015 To: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals From: Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager Subject: 5605 Woodstock Avenue Nate and Dana Isder, Applicants Nate and Dana Isder, owners of 5605 Woodstock Avenue, are seeking a variance from the City Code to allow an existing shed to remain on the lot after the construction of a garage addition. This would require a variance of 363 square feet from the maximum 1,000 square feet of accessory structure area allowed on a single family residential property. The applicants submitted to the City in August building plans for an expansion of an existing two car attached garage which showed a proposed 1,040 square foot attached garage. Staff worked with the architect to reduce the size of the garage to 970.5 square feet (roughly 25 feet wide by 39 feet deep) and to add a covered entry (27.5 square feet) to the east side to meet the articulation requirements of the Zoning Code. This resulted in a proposed accessory structure area of 997.5 square feet. At that time, a survey of the property was submitted that did not include an existing 364 square foot shed in the back yard. An inquiry from a neighbor and a subsequent inspection of the garage work by a City inspector alerted staff to the presence of the shed. As the total area of the two accessory structures is over the 1,000 square foot maximum, the applicants are requesting a variance in order to allow the shed to remain. If the variance is not granted, they have indicated they would prefer to remove the shed rather than make adjustments to the garage structure which is already under construction. The applicants believe the shed was originally a granary from the farmstead that was previously in the area. A neighboring property contains a shed that was the chicken coop; the original farmhouse has been modernized and is located across the street at 5610 Woodstock Avenue. They point to the historic nature of the three buildings as a unique aspect of the area, including their property, which necessitates a variance. A neighbor has indicated that it is possible the shed was moved to its current location at the time the house was placed in its current location on the lot. The garage addition was designed to complement the existing home in its architectural style. The shed has been in its current location and configuration for many decades. Therefore, the applicants feel that approval of a variance would not alter the character of the neighborhood. The proposal requires a variance from the following section of City Code: Section 11.21, Single Family Zoning District, Subd. 12(E): The maximum accessory structure area allowed is 1,000 square feet. The applicants are requesting a variance of 364 square feet off of the allowed 1,000 square feet for a total of 1,364 square feet of accessory structure area. Staff Recommendation: In reviewing this application, staff has maintained the points of examination to the considerations outlined in Minnesota State Statute 462.357, requiring that a property exhibit "practical difficulties" in order for a variance to be granted. Practical difficulties result in a use that is reasonable, are based on a problem that is unique to the property, are not caused by the landowner, and do not alter the essential character of the locality. The age and history of the shed in the context of the former farmstead does create a situation that is unique to the property. The request to allow the construction of the garage to continue in its current form and to allow the shed to remain would not significantly alter the essential character of the neighborhood. Staff feels these two criteria for granting a variance have been met. The size of the proposed garage addition/expansion is well above what is typically considered reasonable from the Board of Zoning Appeals when considering a variance. In addition, although the applicants point to the fact that the survey of the property submitted to the City was incomplete and left off the existing shed, the fact remains that the violation of the Zoning Code has resulted from the landowner's pursuit of a large garage expansion. Staff feels these two criteria for granting a variance have not been met. Staff recommends denial of a request for a variance of 364 square feet off of the allowed 1,000 square feet for a total of 1,364 square feet of accessory structure area. HARVEY A. ANOKA COUNTY SURVXYS & 01s®m FiENNEPIN COUNTY SURVEYS LAN® SURVEYORS MINNEAPOLIS SURVEYS 6410 PALM STREET N. W. REGI*TYRED UNDER LAWS OF STATE OF MINNESOTA SUNSET 4.7658 LICENSID NY ORDINANCE OF CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS OWNER .326 PLYMOUTH BUILDING FEDERAL 8-8721 INDUSTRIAL - JUDICIAL HENNEPIN AT SIXTH MINNEAPOLIS 3. MINNESOTA 111USINESS - TOPOGRAPHICAL fs'l�rbepur'9 Crrtificatr CITY LOTS - PLATTING J �z -09 AND A DEPT. F r ,y 1 • } ti COMBINING THE RECORDS OF J. E. HILL, CIVIL ENGINEER ESTABLISHED lase C. F. SANDHOFF CIVIL ENGINEER ESTASLISHEO I"s JAMES NELSON SURVEYOR ESTABLISHED 1922 METROPOLITAN LAND SURVEYORS, ESTABLISHED 1951 Imdoi � �•.7�;? EY REVIEWED ►VED BY THE P pq /?l/S B SCALE-: C=40' 40' i:! 16 --rile _Ild corr:::ct raprosantz.tion of Lot ?, Diock 2, ;.nd of the locr>:t-ion c." r11 'ui'. iz;:i_' n �, ther3on, -n:: monty if ons. ror•. or on s� iw l�.n::. c T --,? 11 ° a ., ^ T , � nn.y, .. �Llr d..� �i1 a J ,., t,tl �_u ; T":. �... , Cu 11.L' l 9. -.') SIGNED _ CARTWRIGHT AND OLSON try of go lden� valley Zoning Code Variance Application 1. Street address: 0(Q 0'Ej W o 0 d S f" O dc-- A V G 2. Applicant Information: Name: �l.a 4- )OUIII -17Sd-f- Address: 5 u b 5 tfj U U 01 S +-a CA--- V 'L C� c Imo, U Of I P IM t•l S S Y -2--Z Email Address: r� 0' �-G V1 a W i In d o Gi.-eCl L t c-1 og\ • co to Phone Number: ( 9 0.- — j i b — :1 !6 () 0 3. Provide a detailed description of the variance(s) being requested: la I 1 o W a" C'& :1::D e )L K/q CIL x UlFamf J1 1 (I I I a I �� u �, s -1-�,-exp W t L't 6122- / cd 10� -� e w hi Lk V, S P c c, -H ,.c FO Of'-; v� , -� vi -I-ca l� v► (off �� ; rpt Cro h o �i U Gi o. a. ct Qt � i �` o � � � (�v d a r, 0 U �- p" p -C ✓ W 4. Provide a detailed description of need for a variance from the Zoning Code, includir .ha\/c y,,p to I IAC,(L40WD 'V) • Description of building(s) -t-vq C' f p 1-a • Description of proposed addition(s) • Description of proposed alteration(s) to property bgVCAtz-f-r4101. ii!L.f411 lmrrwgmmmm I l/I W Qi at y<- i w 12 0 S.1 r^ IAC -n IJ,21- S I� � f-vo v� �o�' 1-0 V to at 0 w VN 5. Minnesota State Statute 462.357 requires that a property exhibit "practical difficulties" in order for a variance to be considered. Practical Difficulties: • result in a use that is reasonable. • are based on a problem that is unique to the property. • are not caused by the landowner. • do not alter the essential character of the locality. To demonstrate how your request will comply with Minnesota State Statute 462.357, please respond to the following questions: Explain the need for your variance request and how it will result in a reasonable use of the property. NO Svt v V&6v w 0.S d.0 t -.O O t^ h,� o l: al- w _c w (A _vla_wa ut tne- &A-- +-IA Sh-v d PA-UdJ d aV 9 v cavS, c S What is unique about your property and A �- 0 �r -0 Uy en v"up, d jS txsed 1-0r waodwo✓I- v v do you feel that it necessitates a variance? 9,t p,.��l 0V -i of i VtaO(. F +-a �- h--) S k a O� . 114 � v�" h o vy S -H l l to S i S 4-<, a c,/" SS 4;h-04— •V +1-41 CA-I<uk-ep, coop IS 0P1 dLAV Y1 Cx-I� 0 0 r U1 !moi aj o✓ S Vo �-C �-�---I/�-. '� i S S -e, ),- ut P 0 �- OU �j I h 4 1^ - EAplain how the need for a variance is based on circumstances that are not a result of a landowner action. 1341a G7U►. OCG W S �Qrta c/1 LAt, OltV Cod C +I-IAC12"h LN f),( w a S to "LA � � 10 o LA v a H -c t, 1--7, v t!2� 5�o dyi u d P_ d rV lo -t. 1 t--LILA4jW i h -fit--! S q, fl f- a /,Yx . Explain how, if granted, the proposed variance will not alter the essential character of your neighborhood and Golden Valley as a whole. W v of (4V-A.yu, 1y 1 CIL . S w 4-i' o h a 1 t c, vL ct I -c rel � py(-S 0, vf, a s C,+t v o o kAb y I!� C. i'l�-c t•,Q •'S 0", (n i S"V-1 G V' •t U 0.1- b L v In [•U bl H h 0 V h o o Gi' y— �, A ti GQ `-Q f�t�t,Q� !/�' IYVt S G ✓ v L d F'ti ✓ r t G�,V L t/� /00 cly 01 r 9 . 6. The City requests that you consider all available project options that are permitted by the Zoning Code prior to requesting a variance. The Board of Zoning Appeals will discuss alternative options to seeking variance with you at the public hearing. Please describe alternate ways to do your project that do not require variances to the Zoning Code. Cil 1--tir rat u v,VI V� QLy�� v a v a I/1 a H -y- t'My V +-VU (/l -Is h V r Ci OI 1/ZC 1 vi Lt--Ia lea o' 7. Please submit a current survey of your property. You must indicate the proposed addition, including new proposed building and structure setbacks, on the survey. A copy of Golden Valley's survey requirements is available upon request. Please note that this application is considered incomplete without the submittal of a current property survey. 8. Please submit at least one current color photograph of the area affected by the proposed variance. You may attach a printed photograph to this application, or you may email a digital image to planning@goldenvalleymn.gov. You may submit additional photographs as needed. To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct. I also understand that unless construction of the action applicable to this variance request, if granted, is not taken within one year, the variance expires. I have considered all options afforded to me through the City's Zoning Code, and feel that there is no alternate way to achieve my objective except to seek a variance to zoning rules and regulations. 1 give permission for Golden Valley staff, as well as members of the Board of Zoning Appeals, to enter my property prior to the public hearing to inspect the area affected by this request. Si at a of 4pplicant If the applicant is not the owner of all property involved in this application, please name the owner of this property: Print Name of owner Signature of owner X-- $200 Application Fee Attached (for Single Family Residential) $300 Application Fee Attached (for all other Zoning Districts) Please note: The City of Golden Valley will send notice of your variance request to all adjoining property owners as well as owners of properties directly across streets or alleys. Your neighbors have the right to address the Board of Zoning Appeals at your public hearing. You are advised to personally contact your neighbors and explain your project to them prior to the public hearing. s f�y •: ,efiFy 'r a 'G' ,z�F � �ljy �1� of . w.. 4. i _ :F , �' ;G'II •� .. ` _f ' . ,s.. _ • a t J 471 � ..r• � 1 � 1 � i 4 { d k i 'S 9AH ADOISOOOM 9099 :43KI(tiSa2I HWISI 9HI 2103 JAII19QOW9'd v mOI.LIQav S3WOH lq%Zu:)IOd VIOSaNNIW `AHTIVA NaQ'IOO 'S HAV ?IDOISQOOM 9099 :43NIGISMI HWISI 3HI 2IOd DNI19GOW911 W NOIIICIGV z Q J �/ O O LL Q z O U w ELU O D a o V p aw � 2 a� �g z Q J �/ O O LL Q z O U w SIWOH �L[$i'jtj�IOd V,LOSaNNIIN `AH'IIVA NHQ'IOD 'S HAV NDOISQOOM 9099 13NMISIH x:4Qsl HHI 2IOd JNI"I9QOW9N V NOLLIQQV w I w w � ¥ § # £*�\ § § k )) ■ f ' �§}([ §§ ` �fwn �■!I §7 )■f/(2 w. §f � !E d o Jew aH IVA a o0 33&v NOOI O0o* q# :13VIGI S IH HWIS I 9141 «o oma cow9s V &m2OGv $ ,| !§g ■>( 9PR2 A/{ k, § � ( m a ){ )}}q) §@ § # |! § § k )) a � §§ ` �fwn w. d o Jew aH IVA a o0 33&v NOOI O0o* q# :13VIGI S IH HWIS I 9141 «o oma cow9s V &m2OGv $ ,| !§g ■>( 9PR2 A/{ k, § � ( m a ){ )}}q) |! § § k )) a � §§ ` ■,et ( / e� Date: October 26, 2015 Physical Development Department 763-593-8095 / 763-593-8109 (fax) To: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals From: Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager Subject: 4301 Woodstock Avenue Gonyea Homes, Applicant Gonyea Homes, applicant on behalf of the property owners at 4301 Woodstock Avenue, is seeking a variance from the City Code to construct a new home on the lot which would require a variance of 4.9 feet off of the required front yard setback of 35 feet to a distance of 30.1 feet from the east property line. The lot in question is a corner lot with an existing home on the southerly portion. As a corner lot, the property has two front yards—one to the north and one to the east. The attached garage of the existing house currently extends into the eastern front yard setback by 4.5 feet. There is no record of any existing variances for this property. The applicant has noted the unique circumstances of the property in that it is a corner lot that narrows to the north. The current home sits at the back of the lot, resulting in a large front yard and a very small back yard that is heavily wooded. In order to create a reasonably sized back yard for the new owners, the applicant is proposing to locate the new home closer to the front (north) of the lot. Because of the narrowing of the lot in this area, there is a smaller envelope in which to build. As an alternative, the applicant stated that an option which would have rotated the home was explored. This would have resulted in a side loaded garage off of Woodstock Avenue to the north. Under this design, the back yard space would be limited and views from the new home would be directed into the yard and home of the neighbor to the west. The proposal requires a variance from the following section of City Code: Section 11.21, Single Family Zoning District, Subd. 11(A)(1) Front Yard Setback Requirements: The minimum front yard (east) setback requirement is 35 feet. The applicant is requesting a variance of 4.9 feet off of the required 35 feet to a distance of 30.1 feet at its closest point to the east property line. Staff Recommendation: In reviewing this application, staff has maintained the points of examination to the considerations outlined in Minnesota State Statute 462.357, requiring that a property exhibit "practical difficulties" in order for a variance to be granted. Practical difficulties result in a use that is reasonable, are based on a problem that is unique to the property, are not caused by the landowner, and do not alter the essential character of the locality. In an effort to create a viable back yard for the property, the proposed location is reasonable for a new home. The unique shape of the corner lot causes the front of the property to narrow, creating a smaller envelope in which to build without extending into the setback area. The proposed home does not significantly alter the essential character of the neighborhood as the existing home already extends into the front yard setback by a similar amount. Staff recommends approval of a request for a variance of 4.9 feet off the required front yard setback of 35 feet to a distance of 30.1 feet from the east property line. L45�12 4524 4500 520 529 540 535 42391237 4205 536 532 Chatelain Ter o524 501 529 528 510 500 521 520--525— .fiZ 524 4515 4501 0 0 0 d s m Q 520— O 421 516 • 317 r r, —516— Z 448 Q 512 c 512-" 339 341 Subject Property 505 506 509 — 508 �Orn,51 e 4200 335 416 500 500 31 437 436 4317 WoodStoO 4309 336 422 4217 4213 4205 4135 412 426 4301 4127 433 ' 328 Jr 416 427, 4312 411 400 4220 322 4212 4200 4124 341 Beverly Ave �41 316 4309 , 44301 r- 321 - 340 ? : ° 4221 4215 4203 41274121 4117. �.� . 310 311 e,: 332 , 300 301 301 4216^ 4212 4124 300 316 243 Poplar Dr 235 Loring Ln 300 250 _ ___ 1 4215 227 4123 • city 0 golden valley Y Zoning Code Variance Application 1. Street address: WOMSTuc,k AsiE, 2. Applicant Information: Name: _ ta6myf, 46M fs Address: 10102• 0(-'-s A h�til'i0iZ1A �• 1.t1 �I God MA ssg21. Email Address: JOa Go4YEA COM MA -*t► tis . C ®M Phone Number: 7(O 3- 43Z - 4sg-7 3. Provide a detailed description of the variance(s) being requested: OF "B5 M4AW V. 4. Provide a detailed description of need for a variance from the Zoning Code, including: • Description of building(s) • Description of proposed addition(s) • Description of proposed alteration(s) to property YAM Sfc, S4tk. s . SEgagi..N L 1 M rrs 5kjj,,Q1t4bj _ Enl dtiio�pk. . 5. Minnesota State Statute 462.357 requires that a property exhibit "practical difficulties" in order for a variance to be considered. Practical Difficulties: • result in a use that is reasonable. • are based on a problem that is unique to the property. • are not caused by the landowner. • do not alter the essential character of the locality. To demonstrate how your request will comply with Minnesota State Statute 462.357, please respond to the following questions: Explain the need for your variance request and how it will result in a reasonable use of the property. r 5VM(,M 9*, Dais OOT 00NT YAH%D SCT&�!k .S IU eW S-t�-uL`t�Q.+ W t LA. jt4, QA j f L 51 Mt�J41C. ►JS What is unique about your property and how do you feel that it necessitates a variance? S�cT6�s.�-d S�c11EI�c..I.N Lt M trS B+�t�u�V, FJIV�r.C.�Pfc. Explain how the need for a variance is based on circumstances that are not a result of a landowner action. I EIlLf.&ALJ4Z SF4A�?Ed l�.o't� Explain how, if granted, the proposed variance will not alter the essential character of your neighborhood and Golden Valley as a whole. AW 9FoPoSED STRMC-1-A%E, Wtta. t - St-Att-A& S4-O"Bkth A6 C) 1S'[UJ4 S'itucrcLA LE W 1'1� uo/-d-Aj%,- - A�.i.N-tT+�c.'iN'P�4�. Iw 6. The City requests that you consider all available project options that are permitted by the Zoning Code prior to requesting a variance. The Board of Zoning Appeals will discuss alternative options to seeking variance with you at the public hearing. Please describe alternate ways to do your project that do not require variances to the Zoning Code. AL T-"NArr*- OPno*A tnrOW,O �E TO �DMo¢� D¢it1� O Slotit,o v C 1a W60e -nGIC %)f, VJOwLp LIMIT YAlLo SPAtk A -4o Diktr Vices CoFNDoRS D1144M,Y T'y 1Af-VL 5P?4S *%&SL ©IJ WEST` 51DE of: LOT. T 7. Please submit a current survey of your property. You must indicate the proposed addition, including new proposed building and structure setbacks, on the survey. A copy of Golden Valley's survey requirements is available upon request. Please note that this application is considered incomplete without the submittal of a current property survey. 8. Please submit at least one current color photograph of the area affected by the proposed variance. You may attach a printed photograph to this application, or you may email a digital image to planning@ oldenvalleymn.gov. You may submit additional photographs as needed. To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct. I also understand that unless construction of the action applicable to this variance request, If granted, is not taken within one year, the variance expires. I have considered all options afforded to me through the City's Zoning Code, and feel that there is no alternate way to achieve my objective except to seek a variance to zoning rules and regulations. I give permission for Golden Valley staff, as well as members of the Board of Zoning Appeals, to enter my property prior to the public hearing to inspect the area affected by this request. 4ature pplicant If the applicant is not the owner of all property involved in this application, please name the owner of this property: of Print Name of owner Signature of owner $200 Application Fee Attached (for Single Family Residential) $300 Application Fee Attached (for all other Zoning Districts) Please note: The City of Golden Valley will send notice of your variance request to all adjoining property owners as well as owners of properties directly across streets or alleys. Your neighbors have the right to address the Board of Zoning Appeals at your public hearing. You are advised to personally contact your neighbors and explain your project to them prior to the public hearing. y- j' �.Q f ♦f IV .� r• � max' •1 t fid.. ilk.n A .. �`* •�".. ,L t-� `'+' a'a w1•.,. r.yyS�Wi�n � rr,. 4g ' f3 4 �JY. i N s all _ P t v �� . �- SFE, �. - •� �11W' y- s ' may. 'y"' �. .'i {,� � �� '`Y,. ,. `fir. �,� � ►..�A � I tii � ";. � i . �/�' .� ' 7, .. .. a aC+ . � �.,.. yl�. � � � ; • ,. IIF � �} .� .,ten 1 ,. � _. X �, .. �.� �� � � y •�' •� ,, .�. _ � �. � .r .�w ,�--- w vA k x o C*oN E 3 v un rll s C•— MN y w ami O aO w y Op O c v c a a $Id:t yp C II O16. = o .� ° y w W �yM v 3 y R o 00 F. II d t a�:.. �N G 'g it Orn �O h coQy°:� as a E' =� c° T b W A 0+0�o Odp o�E o k 00 c�o 00 0`0 0000 O O N O .>r b p O >+ W II II II ti" CL O O$ V O O O �•+ d av = op y m °' op A H 0.i WxtiUF-F- 'y e = a o w 3 TIc w m o p a o p p 00 00 [ oa p m v W r. z O> '� m i y N b O C p o w o 'b rn W m in ro oO o o yo > ti o o x y ami o W M N W N Ip F FF y K T,o c5 ov >3° p5 aan 0 3N x O�W °px d wphc^ > O va le Oopd o > U z cno 5b Iit vII .? .° o o M O yaU -19 'E5 °paC F- M bCZ w Q d w m aw tom. o 0 0 G 5 °45 c.> z �bx Cv �+i v 10 vi 6 r; 06u is, acCr� � � �� W-t=0Fp- -Ap tIt cu � r ter— ca cc 00 3AIJa 310WpV �� - o•(946.0) � Sb8 — �u \ L'968 18 oo — ao co X z "t K ' t6 01 \6 - m00 o y� oo�op dve� dl ]Nd 09' I M, 99-1 �000S 0 S6OL ?JH81 dl ONd 4� 1� CO. 10 I'Lb8 �/ 00 mss, ` Z' / / x -t xro ' - 00 � u ao I CtD r4) x I Kf n n C, \()'D — 00 O)l - x v t v �I x i I °� v} SCJ Q co x n ` CO m - ABs 0 6 Z Bs x � \— BSBL s8\ co o ct7 m \ o C, N Oi �� o ! Uig ? ` — N � `� n Q N rn x ` 0'Z o m 000 �, N �� o m x _ 0,17 �' ! S '� aO cc) \ 0 Q` <t co O m 1050, o Z 0 C u6 -00-0-SZ-. oCU 00 00 0 l X ca /x �oOZ 3° x x�° Ol O X/ f o } uoCID OD x 00 Do ^/ / 3W� Z8 SoOL Je81 ix z CO� N df ° a / 8. �bl�q �l X Iq �s8 �\ I�OIoLOS x 00 � I _ ,N / In 846 n � �— of - � - 00 m . QA,ja ;)jouTpv _�� cO 'Sb8 L 968 00 \ ano /0cq X X z Z- co I d• 00 o co 8VG' dl ONd ado 09 g1IMuSS oO®S 960L Hd81 dl ONd I'Lti8 �I D I � � \ � 0.� rt} \ I m /I 4� v I v Orn L0I 0r a () ! CO Qo o NI O r� / re) I / M a9 N I i O � °' CI o�f — 00 x ' -- i OD x000 7 ) n ` t BSBL BSBL BS BL BL s8\ S� 70i 00 v ✓ �. \ \m X m h 0o o m x v_LI I o�CO �\ �- _C. co S r ` V w Co _c 00 1 \ cm� co 00 Ljj co !7' Xx /T 0 0p ao . Un 0 X BSBL�� r� -, O co X/ BSBL oiT BSBIM 1p 00 00 00 00 COi 00 0 00 00 X 00 / f 00 N �� / 00 �Cl � �•bl S60L '�V81 df ON � ��b/ % " 8.0) �8 1191 01L x cc Y \ o OS co 00 m I� I 0 Z LU LU J W Un w W Z U Z W Y m ft F- E N m 0" W _J D 3- W W W v3W z m W N W rcna �� o of z U Fa_- rL , Z U D Z ZO~ 0 0_' W Q p W m O N F- m ISI 0 w o o z ui v� y w K � O N O X 0 Q_ W Q N W af ui W 7) U N N Z D O L d d, U-- Z (n O O Z Z z< - �- O O O 0 a � = • • o .1 u O 0t wm m< NW `l�-IVA N3aOO � N OmQjrrR m U.)ZZ�SS 2LL IL rz rn c7 m#0 Z ° o II ww zrc II Q ILw .aI.—Moll ti K��r w ouiu rn wzwm w paaa �K Ow �zz wmW Z m rca _ � auk bN�O6 y�010~ 0,z Zo �d , z 0 w I z LO =Op t� II II • Wo II II II II II SOdSOSJ�0'a II II II II II o II z oow LLD W2. zo �� II II 0 0 N II w W �_ � wO II II Fl m N SEIWOH V3ANOO SWZ 0 1HSGH XV" 39VN3AV 9.LZ -_-n I NGS NO / Zoo , o ; am tl 1 U .�s 0 N m m ami w Ox ti M�, .1 u §Ow 0t wm m< I ifs a L) 2LL 9w rz rn c7 Z 0 o II ww zrc II Q ILw .aI.—Moll ti K��r w w rn wzwm w paaa �K Ow �zz �o m rca o auk I NGS NO / Zoo , o ; am tl 1 U .�s 0 N m m ami w Ox ti M�, .1 u §Ow wm m< a L) 2LL 9w rz rn c7 Z 0 o II ww zrc II Q ILw � ti K��r w w rn wzwm w paaa �K Ow �zz ��m m rca o auk 0000 0,z �Q 0 w I mr � II Krn QQ n Fwp �Ow 155 `a0 W W Y U ® < 2 m Iy�I Q W a U N b70SVd d0 dOl Ol'1H -Q) J D O > wx E-gg Ug m K WmIu �J 2 w wC z � c �o g m o pZ 0m ern z0 z'4� oOw Ow a8 aha GIN nz o_�, �__ wo �W rc� wow QKxmm Jm Nz OWi XW� 3w L z W O Q J J Q J a LL m O m F J m Z O _ccw aD arxnD nn �LL�3¢ H O 0 z a 0 11 LU U Z II II o II II Q II � W II —j2 II z� W;I II oa 0 Z I I 0 w I LL � I LL II II II II II II II II II II II II o II �� II II 0 N II w I I wO II II Fl -Q) J D O > wx E-gg Ug m K WmIu �J 2 w wC z � c �o g m o pZ 0m ern z0 z'4� oOw Ow a8 aha GIN nz o_�, �__ wo �W rc� wow QKxmm Jm Nz OWi XW� 3w L z W O Q J J Q J a LL m O m F J m Z O _ccw aD arxnD nn �LL�3¢ H O 0 z a 0 11 LU U • . Q� "o WW o�"N z W 77 Z O a c Z O °Orn O yz, OOLLLL w O • • /nI v 90 0 Z) W Q' w m 8 m ZZt,55 NW `A311VA N9410J `° `� "' r� ci o v -:�-iflN9AV NO01SdOOM I.0£b r 0) o EI-1VONA10 `6 NOO19 `t, 101 o N zz o C'7 'S3�1 O11N` I'8 NOSN39�JOf �Ulm U) 0 U) SAWOH VEIAN00 SWZ 9.9 .9-.L .W& L-.6 1 W `g W city of go ldvalle� Y Date: October 27, 2015 Physical Development Department 763-593-8095 / 763-593-8109 (fax) To: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals From: Emily Goellner, Associate Planner/Grant Writer Melissa Sonnek, Planning Intern Subject: 2601 Noble Avenue North Noble Elementary School — Independent School District #281, Applicant Independent School District #281, property owner of Noble Elementary School at 2601 Noble Avenue North, is seeking a variance from the City Code to construct two additional classrooms and a mechanical room. The applicant is seeking a variance of 20 feet off of required 50 feet to a distance of 30 feet from the side yard (south) property line. The proposed addition is approximately 3,125 square feet. The applicant notes that the building addition is proposed to be located on south wing of the existing Noble Elementary School in order to preserve existing green space and paved play area on the west and north sides of the property. It is also noted that the addition is intended to continue the rectangular shape and overall character of the building. The proposal requires variances from the following sections of City Code: Section 11.46, Institutional Zoning District, Subd. 7 Yard Requirements: Side and rear yards shall not be less than 50 feet in width and depth. Staff Recommendation: In reviewing this application, staff has maintained the points of examination to the considerations outlined in Minnesota State Statute 462.357, requiring that a property exhibit "practical difficulties" in order for a variance to be granted. To constitute practical difficulties, the property owner must propose to use the property in a reasonable manner, the landowners' problem must be due to circumstances unique to the property not caused by the landowner, and that the variance, if granted, must not alter the essential character of the locality. Staff recommends denial of the request for a side yard variance of 20 feet off of the required 50 feet to a distance of 30 feet at its closest point to the side yard (south) property line. City Staff recognizes that this lot is well established with play areas and open space and the applicant would like to maintain these amenities by building the addition on the south wing. The long rectangular shape of the building in relation to the lot is unique; however, staff finds that the uniqueness of this property does not necessitate a variance to the setback requirement. The buildable area of this lot is extensive and it is surrounded by single family homes. A variance from the setback requirements for this property would alter the essential character of the locality. While staff finds that the purpose and size of the addition are reasonable, staff recommends that the applicant further explore the option to build on the west side of the building to avoid the need for a variance from the setback requirements. 750 1960 4950 4920 4910 4900 4860 3850 4800 4750 •2770 2720 2765 1 1 1 2720 2716 2740 2755._ Uund Ln •2750 2700 2701 Z 2700 2701 � 2700 4915 4405 4901 4861 4851 4801 4751 Q .2745 2720 2710 27tti Ave N Subject Property 2650 2651 2650 2651 2650 705 2700 27 10 4800 1750 2700 Z Q 2680 2680 2695 > 26SD 2631 2610 2641 2G85 Marie Ln L Q F23 5005 26 4811 4801 4755 �725r 2630 2631 2630 2637 2670 2675 2670 2675 0 I q Z 2665 2 2640 ' 2620 2621 2620 2621 2660 2655 v 2640 2655 2620 000 Q 2650 2625 n 2620 2625 2620 2610 2611 2611 2600 2610 O 5005 2600 2605 2600 2605 2600 _. 4620 4600 4500 2600 2582 2585 Z 2580 2585 2580 2585 2580 Hampton Rd 2516 > 2601 0 4609 4603 14523 4509 4503 2545 +25302545 2545 2540 y 12510 2508 m 505 � 2500 2505 2500 2505 2500 4608 4600 4516 4508 4500 2 500 485 2480 2495 2490 2485 2480- 4444 465 2460 2475 2460 2440 4611 4601 4521 4511 4501 I 2435 i 445 2340 2445 2430 I; 4880 4840 4800 4780 1780 ( 4700 4630 2 4900 J4620 4610 _ 425 2420 4950 I 2441 5000 4605 —50 4865 4615 eek Ln 2421 2405 4905 48,,15 4925 4735 rj�'-^= 7 4625 4975 i r 2355 i 5005 2365 4615 < 5055 2285 . 2345 5100 2260 2257 —� 2241 4930 4�0 481 2300 2325 } city 0 golden valley Zoning Code Variance Application 1. Street address: 2601 Noble Avenue North Golden Valley, Minnesota 2. Applicant Information: Name: Independent School District #281 Address: 4148 Winnetka Avenue North t Ny� om th New Hope, Minnesota 55427 Yj9J Email Address: �j 3 �J /. Phone Number: �]&TI-504-8000 Via /-75 ECKU- 3. Provide a detailed description of the variance(s) being requested: Requesting a variance to reduce the side yard setback from 50' to 30'. 4. Provide a detailed description of need for a variance from the Zoning Code, including: • Description of building(s) • Description of proposed addition(s) • Description of proposed alteration(s) to property Existing building is the Noble Elementary School. Proposed addition includes two classrooms, mechanical room and circulation. These would be added onto the existing South classroom wing of the building. 5. Minnesota State Statute 462.357 requires that a property exhibit "practical difficulties" in order for a variance to be considered. Practical Difficulties: • result in a use that is reasonable. • are based on a problem that is unique to the property. • are not caused by the landowner. • do not alter the essential character of the locality. To demonstrate how your request will comply with Minnesota State Statute 462.357, please respond to the following questions: Explain the need for your variance request and how it will result in a reasonable use of the property. The current alignment of the South wing of the property line and the 50' setback results in any addition that will set as an angle to the building. What is unique about your property and how do you feel that it necessitates a variance? The reduction of the setback from 50' to 30' will allow for a more rectilinear building addition configuration. Explain how the need fog` a variance is based on circumstances that are not a result of a landowner action. Zoning ordinance setback requirements at 50'. Explain how, if granted, the proposed variance will not alter the essential character of your neighborhood and Golden Valley as a whole. The resultant addition will be in character with the existing building and will still provide a significant setback to the adiacent property. 6. The City requests that you consider all available project options that are permitted by the Zoning Code prior to requesting a variance. The Board of Zoning Appeals will discuss alternative options to seeking variance with you at the public hearing. Please describe alternate ways to do your project that do not require variances to the Zoning Code. Adding onto the building on the South end without variance will require the classroom to be constructed farther to the West and will further encroach on the existing green space hard surface playground. 7. Please submit a current survey of your property. You must indicate the proposed addition, including new proposed building and structure setbacks, on the survey. A copy of Golden Valley's survey requirements is available upon request. Please note that this application is considered incomplete without the submittal of a current property survey. 8. Please submit at least one current color photograph of the area affected by the proposed variance. You may attach a printed photograph to this application, or you may email a digital image to planning@goldenvalleymn.gov. You may submit additional photographs as needed. To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct. I also understand that unless construction of the action applicable to this variance request, if granted, is not taken within one year, the variance expires. 1 have considered all options afforded to me through the City's Zoning Code, and feel that there is no alternate way to achieve my objective except to seek a variance to zoning rules and regulations. I give permission for Golden Valley staff, as well as members of the Board of Zoning Appeals, to enter my property prior to the public hearing to inspect the area affected by this request. Signature of Applica If the applicant is not the owner of all property involved in this application, please name the owner of this property: F41WADALC AIKA-SCVWL� Print Name of owner Signature of ownt/ $200 Application Fee Attached (for Single Family Residential) X $300 Application Fee Attached (for all other Zoning Districts) Please note: The City of Golden Valley will send notice of your variance request to all adjoining property owners as well as owners of properties directly across streets or alleys. Your neighbors have the right to address the Board of Zoning Appeals at your public hearing. You are advised to personally contact your neighbors and explain your project to them prior to the public hearing. NC o i aCM r R.- 0 LAJ iD m J N f WA m s JCD co 0 'a S a 0 3 o CJ G- Oy:= NC -)E � CDCD i w0 R.- 0 V CM 3 �3 a LO IW '*woo W U Z H � W i ' a LO i' W T s3 3 � � t Q d L u 4�r U � c � c a 2 Z � � 1 IW '*woo W U Z H � W i ' a LO W T s3 3 tls Q i i M a IW '*woo W U Z H � W .o U CD 0 a> a, • o � a c 0) x z ¢ W � � a G W Co 3 x 2 m co C .o U CD a> a, • � 0 O 0) x ................ CZ W ; ........... ............__... a I E3 i cm O J W N89042 Y a m W h W � Z Z J H � cn ~ X W W a L a Y 560.03 a m ui W O ui cn O d O O d M _Eraa SWMERLrEET OF ME sv OUMTER OF YO. T , its, ROE. 3. 1 F /RST A D O l TIONSET aN axM«a:Y e.LS 0.s4eo 70 8 7 6 (� / FT O.M.raWN ! L Nx PEN. ,.... - rLL; FENCE �I u. < —T, � r' rjth, � \ x Lu = 1. _`� g^ jI No' 3 { H w� r:. _ l CL I �•4,) I '� Q"ee rr /// ,yd£ Iy'` •, w \w. ., 'Lxx�t�� ViA w„ A. isqz A { I ' :'' , b n�xe \✓+y' .s d11Pen'�L /+ are l �t / I 5 ✓. Mar ,, o $ \ IT Y- p�a3 f'f?'!J> o ,;+il ItDkgEENfc 1 � ` �,a� i ���''xN L,., rm., »>_.,. � \\ �=-_...�I'.•--,,,, `--=" ... ��', Y�ff,Ny: ✓ � �� � �'�N I,,:. so, f + t ea I kUOF Md1�-...M,.... �").,., �+ IL Mart IF ME � s `\ '^` ' 1 .1 .m°°ri 3A R ..... V 1 &$Ec 7. Tw cE x r, d, N ,,/,z,l--.-••,.„".: �. `". j n...+:. ", _., ' .. y FENOE R° rM : °*-'-'a-�s I "a /ra `°•.:. �.,x. '�„/%1 j/ '/ � /Ee "iq �� j' �^ s� 1.• �r ,,,W' pry ( ;;'n '.. I N UK P�iPM29NHOEE.. 21 j/ / jj� %en `t I �,y s d • / . l a sEc 1e (' !:rct mnx Y s It - k a, • Denotes r. m.ummt set or previously fy ,jl 1' �/ {, S I f `•' ( j - ( ix M'• I set mor4<d with P.L 5 No 15180 /" {,y! 1 t rofM! s F �Ls/ 1 4 •,: • Omptez Fauna 'ran monumml 17 r' m r & }-i �''• I Ac Denotes a. < d t pots AGE D.ol<s oboes ground ppe it -.� %'r'x:%x '•rs. l/�j ;£, / ( , I w ," AIS Denotes otlwrt s'r,q 8 ' I.moll. sign UNN FEN¢ ,'- BBH DenotGS bVzketbae hoop "so BE D of b a g nl<ur < BTL De at,, beaver to b ) / °Z':° ° AT cB Denotes catch baso f K., / y, / cos Denote, <� aermAe CIP Denotes cast r. P. a 7y : r •�,e r'[( !�`� y/ /" R 1 e / COL Denotes Du dnq column O T e I - °'k' �, Ix .7J• r I De Omat<A d.an gate DIP Denpt<s ductte it n pipe v ' I I .t ,., • p f � J s+ I EM Denotes ..clmeter I • ,^r gl rix !{F8 p ��;, f % fr 1 ) ! -Y ' FCAP Denotes ic tiler IF Denotes bn,h,d fl,,r 2 � . r^ Sr; . FIT Denol<s Ire hookup 1 I FP Denotes raq Pae I I (- :n. / Y - FW Denotes rote r woh «�,.1 I I r"`.... u., \ J ; I I ( ' p :N „ Tx. G Denotes qull<r /0 � I � 1 I L GM Oenoles ' 1 GP Denotes guartl post rl. GW Denotes nu^ rre -. / HCRB Zola, a P Push buttes .,,• '''" L . ` « N •. L _ HCR 0 d. p romp s,< HCs D ate, a atop sgn /3 WEO I •\ HDPE Oenoles Nigh densty Pclyeth VII, Pipe INE,RM NON E T \ ` ' n i I ! � ! HH a a >.\" as. ,, /� f 1 I /�: ' 't' $ Hro Dmmee fro ydrant ....., INv Dmmes sbucwr< inrwt LP D<nalee Tg<1 p<oe 59 / f !' MG Oenoles Its ver In,. I ^e^• I rp °'c i /'f M Denotes mo de ,n, DHE Denotes overhead ele<lrc 'ne " I ,: 'F :..�� + .x... »� .N550/1 o0H Denolea bu tlng%/ PGEastiIdepuwma�Denotes post dator Ive EadMO t r PNS denotes park -ng sgn t 7PPDetes Powe• poe 9 -I I en,.PVC Denotes polywnylcn arm<vb< I v:,{le Nn / I RCP Den t enforced c.cre pipe . ° " / ( I 1 SAN Denat<s on tory manna. rl/ j mi SANS Denotes on lacy leve '0' F \'s se Denotes o boi nog i v-^'s-tP T r 1 I I SMH Denotes storm ode `�„ ?sW r I� 1 I I she f ,.4ii., +F' 'w x I Si 5 Denotes storm s '^°' w,s�:� m <w P F e I sWB Denotes stone wa base >~, I '. - !� vets % ;f w'�f ( I I y # rt,w• aver Dena<s At .< rd Iw a ve a \ '-1 ,A ,,►"r ' I ."�+ / f' I I I ! ) !) TB Denotes Ieleph.e bo, r,,, / iBP Denotes telherbal poleT, ,, /�j.P Y' ; T t ! \ TC D.atn top of cmvete con q, TCS 0<hot.. trot/<conbol Fgn sio TL Oenates ball< light IT 04- TRANS D.mes npnsramer ✓- r / r I P uGC Denotes under9 Duna canmunicat on Ine Ness i % au, f$ 1 ;.� LICE Dennie, urea. vena e1«o-< Ine 1 wT Dena.. di yrwnd to eph.e tine e'er 1 ,es 7/ yet ry pipe W Denotes watts I�e 6 pa I ,. WV Denotes water Iw B_ j" �; yl BAs o.. a Basswood tree as / g 'i,' !I f K -� / • 1 BLCH Denolea Black Cher. free I ,r yerr \ " COT Denotes Cottmrootl tree �' I w..e .PL Denotes..plet treeey O I` n enol.. Red Pne tree 2 1 I I!, •Torr 1. i ( m '- /,ea>s ( 1 PINK D 6 / .vee Denotes Colorado BW< Spruce bee SPCC Dahill.. Cat.ada Green Spruce tree ......... 4+ �_ .n/ a� noxi." •. r: ?.: { µf' v/r'Li' lo, - TR Denotes de duws bee Wu " ✓,r 01F•" WLNT denotes Wolnat Ire. \ \ CHAIN Nx.s/ ENCC / I m. c. r�. --f c :^.ee,.a P SED ADDITION ... ' Rq w sis sa. -i AAr AN Aw.. RFr e_. ;� Gr,.<.t\ ��y ,.,.✓ .',y,. �/ „„� Rau uWUMEE xy _.`t'4h" w n Iktle F NN •, MOr� ,f.y4 u�I xr `ss s \\7J.. ... r .. ! ,?BELS A,`,e - ew, rA« .... i �:._. _.... c. ...,. .,. — ,. .-. ... ..f(/ yen As 7 • FNb � .,. Ox 40NUNENT ' ' •LGE 9iEFi _ he T 030 s/0EH W SWM LINE OF NORMERLv 170 FEET OF _ ?r O E xw WARTER OF 9:C. 114 Fri M ROE NFIENCE wDOD O s c J 2 11 6 'A O F 2 s 1.) Survey poordinale basis. Hennepin Cwnfy Coordinate System 2.) At III lime liodl work Fos pe.famed for this survey, three w Agn'fcant a unt of AF (Per Doc. No. 276t557) _ o, a mo ow on Ine ground. Physical teal urea were to Fd. t sr ai best of ver ability, halt,,, but there may be additional features that vera not tisible antl, thw<fae, not Mown hereon. The easterly 593 /eat , ad oath 470 feet of Me Nolsidi-1 0uarter that Section 18, pAwreE» rL«,. Township 29, Rang, 24, Wesl of Me fourlM1 Principal Meridian, ev<ePt that part thaeIf I taken far use as a public rood and The easterly 593 feel of this s [holy JJO /eel of F1\ I he S. 11h est 0uarI., of Section 7, Township 29, Range 24 West of lh< I..," * j t Pr ne pal VA,kldn, e.cepl that part thio -f tisk. fes use as a public road. k I.) UNRy' mf,ti- from plans and markings woe combned si observed evidence of ultras to I SCA deve w w of tree underground utl ties shown n H ver lacking IIawt on the Properly s located In Hennepin County, Minnesota. ere.. owe c Ish' odd.fi of undagrwnd ,d ihes condor be acil.d. y completely and reliably deo Cited. I y� repaired. evcawtion may b< neceesar ....... xHwe aaa¢i.P1 a mP.e aetanee mmrmat. s y 2) other undsrgrd utilities of wm which we aunaware mar eei,L verify all utilities criticd to c.struaud cl on ar deign_ This survey p p d without the befit of current l0s work. Easements, R Some under d uIihl t'ms ares arm s mork<d .site b those utility amPanies apP�rtmans d I brau Cies rete era m curtendiditi� to tRraueance comm�m oe groan y lave r r c y s .bkct to ri,p. ipl f a t title lmeFt whose o<alors resp.ded to ver GOPh<rh51.1. Dns tan ticket number 1 30 21 011 8. attorney's title apin'on.vs 4.) Contact GOPHER STATE ONE CALL at 651-,454-0002 (800-252-1166) for pre<s< onsite ' I hereb til that this survey, plan o location of utilities P,w to any .... wli.. prepare, by me o under my at ... t sup<rvisionl s and that I am a duly Lice<d Land Surveyor antler the laws of the State of Minnesota. Area 448,034 Aqua.. feet . 10.285 Does Dated this 30th day of January. 2013 1.) Zoninginformation obtained frau the City PI Golden Valley web At. January 29 20, 3. SUNDE LAND SURYENNG, LLC. Tree subject pr.wty is zw,d 1-1. (loalitull.ol sub-Districl 1) By. Nar- --- ---- ------ k s. Hans., P.LS. Minn. Lic. No. 15480 Th e setback, for :one 1-1 oro. Building: Front 8 shiest - 35 feet Side k rear = 50 feel I.) Top of lop nut of Rre hydr.l on west side of Noble Ave, and Hampton Road. Restrictions (f<., building setbacks. height and bulk rest,icti,h , etc.) Mown Elewli. w 885.28 feet 2. .pap hereon ore based on infarmotiah provided and aro subp<t to in lap,.WtI.F. z.) Top of to nut of ore nyer.l m front of 4601 Nwrmee D, 80t/,V 4RY, LOCATION, TOPOGRAPI 2.) Parking. 61 Regubr space, Elell.. 890.75 fastarrd UTILIJYSURVEYFOR.* ndi Hacw ap Space ISD NO. 281 62 Total So.... NOBLE ELEMENTARY SCHOC j� SUNDE , _M,_ . w LANU.SURV yjNr Pw"..fr°a la wro. 30 0 JO 60 qw' r: ns-,srSeesn. ask°Debi_ M 3p SCALE IN FEET Fa.: W,pXYbAa•a 21 Snxe city of goldenov�MEMORANDUM 0 %, .' Physical Development Department WY 763-593-8095 / 763-593-8109 (fax) Date: October 27, 2015 To: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals From: Emily Goellner, Associate Planner/Grant Writer Melissa Sonnek, Planning Intern Subject: 1319 Tyrol Trail Dan and Sheila Broughton, Applicants Dan and Sheila Broughton, owners of the property at 1319 Tyrol Trail, are seeking two variances from the City Code to construct a three season porch on the southwest corner of the lot. The applicants are seeking a variance of 12.1 feet off of the required 35 feet to a distance of 22.9 feet at its closest point to the front yard (west) property line. The applicants are also seeking a variance of 1 foot off the required 15 feet to a distance of 14 feet at its closest point to the side yard (south) property line. Since staff is not able to determine a "true" front yard (the shorter of the two front lot lines), there is no rear yard on this property. In September 2012, the previous owners of the home received approval to build a 240 square foot bedroom addition in the same general location of this proposal, which was larger than the 120 square foot three -season porch proposed in this application. The previous owners were granted approval to build to a distance of 19.5 feet at its closest point to the (west) front yard property line and 13.7 feet at its closest point to the (south) side yard property line. With the same application, the previous owners also requested a variance to build a deck onto the proposed addition (see attached survey from 2012), but the Board denied this request. In May 2015, the current owners received approval for variances for projects on the east and south sides of the home. To the east of the home, the owners were granted approval to build a second garage stall and additional living space. Construction drawings are underway for this addition. The Board also granted approval for a deck on the south side of the home (in a different location than what is currently proposed), but it is not yet built. The applicant notes that the lot is triangular and located on a corner lot, which significantly reduces the buildable area. Aside from the size and shape of the lot, grading is also a limiting factor for constructability of the porch. The applicant notes that the grading toward the front of the home is not suitable for additional construction. The proposal requires variances from the following sections of City Code: Section 11.21, Single Family Zoning District, Subd. 11(A)(2) Front Yard Setback Requirements: The minimum front yard (west) setback requirement is 35 feet. The applicant is requesting a variance of 12.1 feet off of the required 35 feet to a distance of 22.9 feet at its closest point to the front yard (west) property line. Section 11.21, Single Family Zoning District, Subd. 11(A)(3) Side Yard Setback Requirements: The minimum side yard (southeast) setback requirement is 25 feet. The Applicant is requesting a variance of 1 foot off of the required 15 feet to a distance of 14 feet at its closest point to the side yard (south) property line. Staff Recommendation: In reviewing this application, staff has maintained the points of examination to the considerations outlined in Minnesota State Statute 462.357, requiring that a property exhibit "practical difficulties" in order for a variance to be granted. To constitute practical difficulties, the property owner must propose to use the property in a reasonable manner, the landowners' problem must be due to circumstances unique to the property not caused by the landowner, and that the variance, if granted, must not alter the essential character of the locality. City staff recognizes that this property is unique in that the buildable area is very limited due to its location on the corner and its triangular shape. A variance is required for nearly any size addition to the existing home. Staff finds that this addition would not compromise the essential character of the locality since many homes in this area have varying setbacks, lot sizes, lot shapes, and topography. The proposed addition would be no closer to the south property line than the home exists today. Staff finds that 120 square feet is a reasonable size for a porch. Staff recommends approval of the request for a front yard variance of 12.1 feet off of the required 35 feet to a distance of 22.9 feet at its closest point to the front yard (west) property line. Staff recommends approval of the request for a side yard variance of 1 foot off of the required 15 feet to a distance of 14 feet at its closest point to the side yard (south) property line. „1324-- ---- 1308 1340 1320 ;.:. 1312 / 1 13iFi \ 1370 1309 Subject Property - 1311 1300 131:5;. _ <1317 1307 ,1445 Tyrol Tr 1319 1 303 1439 1435, N 1406 ' Oa 1429 1406 1410 1411 • m `6I FYI cityaf olden valley Zoning Code Variance Application 1. Street address: 1319 Tyrol Trail, Minneapolis, MN 55408 2. Applicant Information: Name: Jennifer Christiaansen, Assoc. AIA, LEED AP on behalf of Daniel and Sheila Broughton Address: U+B architecture & design 2609 Aldrich Avenue South, Suite 100 Minneapolis, MN 55408 Email Address: Jennifer.Christiaansen@uplusb.com Phone Number: 612.870.2538 3. Provide a detailed description of the variance(s) being requested: The variance would be to add a 3 -season screen porch that encroaches 12'-3" into the 35' front yard setback and 11'-0" into the 25' rear yard setback. This variance will require waivers from sections 11.21 Single Family Zoning District, Subdivision 11(A)1 and 11(A)2. 4. Provide a detailed description of need for a variance from the Zoning Code, including: • Description of building(s) • Description of proposed addition(s) • Description of proposed alteration(s) to property The current home is perched on a prominent corner in the Tyrol Hills neighborhood. As our client is hoping to find a way to connect the existing home, that they are carefully restoring, to the surrounding neighborhood, a new 3 -season porch has been envisioned for the southwest corner of the home. The proposed addition would be a screen porch that would complement the renovation to the existing home, using the same materials as the new cladding of the home as well the same roof line and scale. The addition would have screens on three sides and be transparent. It would have visual connection to the neighborhood and be accessed by a door from the existing den of the home. S. Minnesota State Statute 462.357 requires that a property exhibit "practical difficulties" in order for a variance to be considered. Practical Difficulties: • result in a use that is reasonable. • are based on a problem that is unique to the property. • are not caused by the landowner. • do not alter the essential character of the locality. To demonstrate how your request will comply with Minnesota State Statute 462.357, please respond to the following questions: Explain the need for your variance request and how it will result in a reasonable use of the property. The configuration of the site at 1319 Tyrol Trail results in an extremely small buildable area and thus very real "practical difficulties" for any buyer to renovate the existing home on site. The setback issues relevant to this lot are not caused by our clients, but inherent in the shape of the lot. The site has two front yard setbacks of 35' along the entire West side of the site - from the South tip all the way around the bend to the Northeast tip at the driveway. The site has a rear setback of 25' along the entire south side. This site also has one side yard setback (which is not relevant for this variance). The combination of extensive front yard setback and the long rear yard setback reduces the buildable area on this site to a small footprint, most of which is already filled by the existing home. We worked hard to design the proposed porch to respect the neighbors to the South by maintaining the exact same setback as the existing home has. Currently the southwest tip of the existing house encroaches 11'-0" into the set back, it is 14'-0" off the property line as shown in the survey. We have set the tip of our porch addition to match this 14'-0" offset, so that the porch will not be any closer to the property line separating this site from the adjacent homeowner. The proposed porch that would be included in the renovation (upon approval of this variance) is a reasonable architectural feature that will enhance the neighborhood. It is small in scale, transparent (screens) and connected to the neighborhood through views and proximity. It will add to the elegance of the renovation and the community of Tyrol Hills. What is unique about your property and how do you feel that it necessitates a variance? This is a corner lot that with the current setback requirements causes an unrealistic building footprint to accommodate any flexibility of an addition/renovation to the existing property. Explain how the need for a variance is based on circumstances that are not a result of a landowner action. The current front and rear yard setbacks cause the majority of the existing building footprint to be outside of the setback lines and make any addition to the existing home extremely difficult. Explain how, if granted, the proposed variance will not alter the essential character of your neighborhood and Golden Valley as a whole. The majority of the current building would remain intact. This would allow the house to be one of a handful of original buildings left in this particular neighborhood. The proposed porch will connect the neighbors to his house through its transparency and visual connection. The addition will be architecturally compatible with the existing house and the existing original neighborhood houses. The proposed porch will not encroach any more on the adjacent neighbors as the existing original home does. Most of all, the owners of 1319 Tyrol Trial have invested a significant amount of time and resources into the existing home and their work will no doubt increase the housing stock in this area. Their commitment to the neighborhood is evident even before they take residence there and we feel that this porch would further improve the surrounding area and give life to this very prominent house on the hill. 6. The City requests that you consider all available project options that are permitted by the Zoning Code prior to requesting a variance. The Board of Zoning Appeals will discuss alternative options to seeking variance with you at the public hearing. Please describe alternate ways to do your project that do not require variances to the Zoning Code. Due to the buildable footprint on this site a 3 -season porch on this site would not be possible without a variance. The alternatives we explored were numerous, the main one being: Other locations for the porch. It became clear very quickly that this was not an option due to the grading on the site (the front of the site is the only area where the setbacks would allow an addition but due to the grading and program of the existing home, it would not be possible to add a porch here. The owners realize that not being granted this variance is possible, and if this occurs they will forgo the building of the porch. 7. Please submit a current survey of your property. You must indicate the proposed addition, including new proposed building and structure setbacks, on the survey. A copy of Golden Valley's survey requirements is available upon request. Please note that this application is considered incomplete without the submittal of a current property survey. 8. Please submit at least one current color photograph of the area affected by the proposed variance. You may attach a printed photograph to this application, or you may email a digital image to plan nine eoldenvallevmn.eov. You may submit additional photographs as needed. To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct. I also understand that unless construction of the action applicable to this variance request, if granted, is not taken within one year, the variance expires. 1 have considered all options afforded to me through the City's Zoning Code, and feel that there is no alternate way to achieve my objective except to seek a variance to zoning rules and regulations. I give permission for Golden Valley staff, as well as members of the Board of Zoning Appeals, to enter my property prior to the public hearing to inspect the area affected by this request. ' nat re of Applicant If the applicant is not the owner of all property inv ed in this application, please name the owner of this property: R*411n I/, 1/ .4�� �z Print Name of owner Signature of owner X_ $200 Application Fee Attached (for Single Family Residential) $300 Application Fee Attached (for all other Zoning Districts) Please note: The City of Golden Valley will send notice of your variance request to all adjoining property owners as well as owners of properties directly across streets or alleys. Your neighbors have the right to address the Board of Zoning Appeals at your public hearing. You are advised to personally contact your neighbors and explain your project to them prior to the public hearing. 7. Please submit a current survey of your property. You must indicate the proposed addition, including new proposed building and structure setbacks, on the survey. A copy of Golden Valley's survey requirements is available upon request. Please note that this application is considered incomplete without the submittal of a current property survey. 8. Please submit at least one current color photograph of the area affected by the proposed variance. You may attach a printed photograph to this application, or you may email a digital image to planning@goldenvaIleymn.gov. You may submit additional photographs as needed. To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct. I also understand that unless construction of the action applicable to this variance request, if granted, is not taken within one year, the variance expires. 1 have considered all options afforded to me through the City's Zoning Code, and feel that there is no alternate way to achieve my objective except to seek a variance to zoning rules and regulations. I give permission for Golden Valley staff, as well as members of the Board of Zoning Appeals, to enter my property prior to the public hearing to inspect the area affected by this request. Signature of Applicant If the applicant is not the owner of all property involved in this application, please name the owner of this property: Print Name of owner Signature of owner $200 Application Fee Attached (for Single Family Residential) $300 Application Fee Attached (for all other Zoning Districts) Please note: The City of Golden Valley will send notice of your variance request to all adjoining property owners as well as owners of properties directly across streets or alleys. Your neighbors have the right to address the Board of Zoning Appeals at your public hearing. You are advised to personally contact your neighbors and explain your project to them prior to the public hearing. Cit vof valley CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY 7800 Golden Valley Road Board of Zoning Appeals Golden Valley, MN 55427 Notice of Final Order June 5, 2015 Petitioner(s): Dan and Sheila Broughton — c/o U + B Architecture & Design Address: 1319 Tyrol Trail Golden Valley MN 55416 At a regular meeting of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals held on May 20, 2015, your petition for the following waivers from the City's Zoning Code were approved for the property located at 1319 Tyrol Trail: Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Single Family Zoning District, Subd. 11(A)(1) Front Yard Setback Requirements • 6 ft. off of the required 17 ft. to a distance of 11 ft. at its closest point to the side yard (south) property line too allow for the construction of a garage and house addition. Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Single Family Zoning District, Subd. 11(A)(3) Yard Setback Requirements • 2.3 ft. off of the required 17 ft. to a distance of 14.7 ft. at its closest point to the side yard (southeast) property line to allow for the construction of a porch addition. Attached you will find an unofficial copy of the minutes of the Board. Staff Liaison Board of Zoning Appeals If waiver(s) are not acted upon within one year from the date of this Order in accordance with statutes, the waiver(s) have expired. 763-593-8000 F ; 763-593-8109 i -iv 763-593-3968 qov 2c�15 SmLN The Gregory Group d.b.a. LOT SURVEYS COMPANY, INC. Established in 1962 LAND SURVEYORS REGISTERED UNDER THE LAWS OF STATE OF MINNESOTA 7601 73rd Avenue Nonh (763) 560.3093 M—r,A., b innewu $5428 Fa Na 560.3522 3uruPgurs Trrtifiratr Basis for hearings is EXI5TING CONDITIONS 5URVEY WITH PROP05ED ADDITION5 FOR: assumed U + B ARCHITECTS Property located in Section 30, Township 29, Rang 24, Hennepin County, Mimesota. Property Address: 1319 Tyrol Trail, Golden Valles, MN Benchmark: Top nut of hydrant located opposite of House No. 1429 Tyrol Trail. Elevation = 861.38 fes (City of Golden Valley records) MOVE EXIST. RO REfAMNG WAL NEW LANWCAPE PAVERS eir.cr ,r Lot 5, Block 2, TYROL HILLS Hennepin County, Minnesota The o* easernents shown are from pals of record or bot mwdon Provided by cher. I osr" that tics plm spedlication, or report was prepared by me or mrder my deed supervision and that t am a duty Licensed land Sweyor under the laws ofthe S'taie of Mlrneada. Surveyed tithe 30th day of April 2015, INVOICE NO. 83804 F,B.NO. 1054-61,62 SCALE: 1'= 301 0Demobs Paul iron MonunNrrt 0 oerwles iron Monument O Denotes wood Hub Sat for mosmasm mly x000.0 Deralse Edshng Elsvatbn 000.0 DwWn Proposed emsm . 00 D.rtotn audsoe Drarnape ExWnp Contour Denobs Proposed Contour Propaeed Redse we s kod to results; of ant Wb. PraOosad OW drm10 n W tam Wax as nvason OW mruNtllo . Proposed aradss shown an No artvey aro bdsrPoiseons of proposedeordoursfromthaerod' ardlordankpnentplana. The ndsdww* between prop. floor slev. to he wM W M bdder. Proposed Top d 91ook Proposed Garage Fi— Proposal Low" Floor Type of Susdino a.pproqcl bw (t a�'provej t o�pproved 4- nok appl -kir-}his n, Etdstim Hardcover Calculations House -1429 sq.ft Driveway - 885 sq.ft Concrete - 96 sq.ft Total Hardcover = 2190 sq.ft Area of Parcel - 9842 sq.ft Peroenupe of Hardcover = 22.3% may 99. ysrwd Proposed Hardcover Calculations Howe + Addrdon -1545 sq.ft Prop. Porch - 825 aq.ft Driveway -1301 sq.ft Steps a stoop - 155 sq.ft Total Hardcover = 3627 aq.ft Area of Pascal = 9842 sq.ft Pereentape of Hardcover = 38.9% 1hS2WvS3804eNap1mn dvrp IGrorR eg(_) Pr". Minn. Reg. No. 24992 Y)" wit CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY Board of Zoning Appeals Notice of Final Order September 7, 2012 Number: 12-08-14 Petitioner(s): Michael & Sandy Sajatovic Address: 1319 Tyrol Trail c t 0 f .gra... va.�I� Y 7800 Golden Valley Road Golden Valley, MN 55427 Golden Valley, MN 55416 At a regular meeting of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals meeting held on August 28, 2012 your petition for the following waivers from the City Zoning Code were approved: Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Single Family Zoning District (R-1), Subd. 11(A)(3)(a) Side Yard Setback Requirements • 8.1 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of 6.9 feet at its closest point to the east side yard property line. Purpose: To allow for the construction of a garage addition with living space above. Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Single Family Zoning District (R-1), Subd. 11(A)(1) Front Yard Setback Requirements • 15.5 feet off the required 35 feet to a distance of 19.5 feet at its closest point to the west front yard property line. Purpose: To allow for the construction of a house addition. Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Single Family Zoning District (R-1), Subd. 11(3)(a) Side Yard Setback Requirements • 1.3 feet off the required 15 feet to a distance of 13.7 feet at its closest point to the south side yard property line. Purpose: To allow for the construction of a house addition. 763-593-8000 Fax 763-593-8109 vi 763-593-3968 www.goidenvalleymn.gov Your petition for the following waiver from the City Zoning Code was denied: Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Single Family Zoning District (R-1), Subd. 11(A)(1) Front Yard Setback Requirements • 12 feet off the required 30 feet to a distance of 18 feet at its closest point to the west front yard property line. Purpose: To allow for the construction of a deck addition. Attached you will find an unofficial copy of the minutes of the Board. Staff Liaison Board of Zoning Appeals If waiver(s) are not acted upon within one year from the date of this Order in accordance with statutes, the waiver(s) have expired. 2n 12- Suw bas of r—.hgs a aasurred. THE GREGORY GROUP, INC. LOT SURVEYS COMPANY, INC. LAND SURVEYORS Embhshed in 1962 REGISTERED UNDER THE LAWS OF STATE OF MINNESOTA 7601 73rd Avmwe Nodh (763) 560-3093 MinnnpoF; Minncrom 55428 F- No. 56&3522 F1'urvrVors Tertifirate IXI5TING CONDITIONS SURVEY WITH PROPOSED ADDITION5 t'OR: MIKE & SANDY SATATOVIC Property located in Section 30, Township 29, Range 24, Hennepin County, bfinnewta Property Addrm: 1319 Tyrol Trail, Golden Valley, Iv1N Benehroado Top out of hydrant located oppositc of House No. 1429 Tyrol Trail. Elc a ism = 861.38 feet (City of Goldess Valley records) "74"t— cb 7 / .44 ' yf � r D� to G6y.7o Lot 5, Block 2,1"CL HILLS Hennepin County, Minnesota The ony __M, tho+.d .re hom plem of rend or HomwW. provided by cfie14 I pertly that this pl.n, .pKWkcatbn, or repos — preywmd by or under my dlrao upe rsion pd UWI .m a duly Licensed Und 5_"or under the i-- of th. SUM- of me—ol.. Surveyed this 19th day of September 2011. INVOICE NO. 79672 F.B.NO. 1054-61,62 SCALE; 1" = 20' • Deno(" Fouts Iron Monument O Onwt-Iron Monumwrd ❑ nerd— Wood Hub SM wr .arvlbn oNy Nf2lro.o Derwr o E.Idbc Elevaon q onra-Proposed Ew.abn ..gglf— DwwwsSudao.Drelwge NOTE: Proposed pm -.r. -bled 1. —11-4 -il Met. - Proposed buidig idomwlion nwe he dMtlied.ah .ppoved buldrp pl.n and de.elop—M or gmdM ph,, b0carsfidn.rd co-fruolbn. Proposal grad- sh— - Ih. euvey.re iMerpoisfid a PMPorod cordoun Inm the dmbwge, grvding and/or devebproem pm-. NOTE: Th mbe.hip beh— p-pu ed floor .W bcrr.1. be ..WW by buld- Proposed Top .1 Block Proposed tramps F— Prapoead Low -1 Flow Type of Barging 1 5 -Fr No. 13.17 1-s"00"' JYve78.6 ove bwTil } � WOiOddreY ./�aw.eh d Me ecs.s Jena NO. 141 Existina Hardcover Calculations House - 1429 sgft Driveway - 885 aq.ft Concrete - 96 sq.ft Total Hardcover = 2190 sq.ft Area of Parcel = 9842 sq.ft Percentage of Hardcover = 22.3% �— By 0,71! Nemo th-S2tb105461 lw79672pmp.dwg Proposed Hardcover Calculations House - 1429 sq.ft Additions - 443 aq.ft Driveway - 665 sq.ft Concrete - 96 sq.ft Total Hardcover = 2633 sq.ft Area of Parcel - 9842 sq.ft Percentage of Hardcover =26.8% signed v ! O ry R Preach, Minn. Reg. tb. 24962 krel ►n L -A -,l I+ '�" ._ �-:w •' � ++�'L�•§.�: j -v` "�-nares " �-s�er�o�er... ^ __ IX Ars"wn .AMA The Gregory Group d.b.a. LOT SURVEYS COMPANY, INC. Established in 1962 LAND SURVEYORS REGISTERED UNDER THE LAWS OF STATE OF MINNESOTA 7601 73rd Avenue North (763) 560-3093 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55428 Fax No. 560-3522 rttftr�t� Basis for bearings is EXI5TING CONDITIONS SURVEY WITH PROP05ED ADDITIONS FOR: assumed U + B ARCHITECTS Property located in Section 30, Township 29, Range 24, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Property Address: 1319 Tyrol Trail, Golden Valley, MN Benchmark: Top nut of hydrant located opposite of House No. 1429 Tyrol Trail. Elevation = 861.38 feet (City of Golden Valley records) Property is in Flood Zone "X" an area of minimal flooding per FEMA map no. 27053C0354E, dated Sept. 2, 2004. Property is Zoned R-1, Residential. 0\, 863.74/ nc cd X6.69 8 1 I 31� INVOICE NO. 83804 F.B.NO. 1054-61,62 SCALE: 1" = 30' • Denotes Found Iron Monument O Denotes Iron Monument x000.0 Denotes Existing Elevation - _ Denotes Existing Contour 010 / I / / / bl2 Q 72// eiA / 875.2 I B7d. 1 / /" I Kock W,/I,/ l S -Fr / I 17 874.5/ 876.9 87/. l No. 1317 W873.3 6 �W 871.7 \ \ I I 12" ne2� �. 677.7 662.39tcc X77.3 garii 1� 8672 l st Hr elev 876.2 mFCer"\ V \•" I 5ht `N�rea I 861.6/ 1,0 h we�„ead ?0 / !Pde 873.6 N � I I K5. l e69. l ��� % v ^tia ^ I I I \� J ry tcc cb 861.3 I 1 1 \ N tw 68. \ \ 1 I B .9 g,� 6• � O B INVOICE NO. 83804 F.B.NO. 1054-61,62 SCALE: 1" = 30' • Denotes Found Iron Monument O Denotes Iron Monument x000.0 Denotes Existing Elevation - _ Denotes Existing Contour 010 / I / / / bl2 Q 72// eiA / 875.2 I B7d. 1 / /" I Kock W,/I,/ l S -Fr / I 17 874.5/ 876.9 87/. l No. 1317 W873.3 6 �W 871.7 \ \ I I 12" ne2� �. 677.7 1 e se ac � fines i s9 . 22.� y ^ 73. N Wo d Fence t t stone .1 b�.2 \ e Q meag t ,1' -tn or line elm 3; 0 \ N 1v� l� �o B�2 - r1 / ROPOSED PORCH ADDITION � '`Y tcc �prr W 861.7p �r 17.e Lot 5, Block 2, TYROL HILLS Hennepin County, Minnesota The only easements shown are from plats of record or information provided by client. I certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Surveyed this 5th day of October 2015. t � 869.3 :7.6 2 -5 -Stone Existino Hardcover Calculations House - 1429 sq.ft Driveway - 665 sq.ft Concrete - 96 sq.ft Total Hardcover = 2190 sq.ft Area of Parcel = 9842 sq.ft Percentage of Hardcover = 22.3% ProDosed Hardcover Calculations House - 1429 sq.ft Driveway - 665 sq.ft Concrete - 96 sq.ft Addition - 120 sq.ft Total Hardcover = 2310 sq.ft Area of Parcel = 9842 sq.ft Percentage of Hardcover = 23.5% Signed A4�� Grego R Pra h, Minn. Reg. No. 24992 X77.3 garii 1� 8672 l st Hr elev 876.2 mFCer"\ V \•" I 5ht `N�rea I rr-- A�'B we�„ead ?0 / !Pde 873.6 N � 1 e se ac � fines i s9 . 22.� y ^ 73. N Wo d Fence t t stone .1 b�.2 \ e Q meag t ,1' -tn or line elm 3; 0 \ N 1v� l� �o B�2 - r1 / ROPOSED PORCH ADDITION � '`Y tcc �prr W 861.7p �r 17.e Lot 5, Block 2, TYROL HILLS Hennepin County, Minnesota The only easements shown are from plats of record or information provided by client. I certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Surveyed this 5th day of October 2015. t � 869.3 :7.6 2 -5 -Stone Existino Hardcover Calculations House - 1429 sq.ft Driveway - 665 sq.ft Concrete - 96 sq.ft Total Hardcover = 2190 sq.ft Area of Parcel = 9842 sq.ft Percentage of Hardcover = 22.3% ProDosed Hardcover Calculations House - 1429 sq.ft Driveway - 665 sq.ft Concrete - 96 sq.ft Addition - 120 sq.ft Total Hardcover = 2310 sq.ft Area of Parcel = 9842 sq.ft Percentage of Hardcover = 23.5% Signed A4�� Grego R Pra h, Minn. Reg. No. 24992 airy of golden!�-rl valley Date: October 27, 2015 Physical Development Department 763-593-8095 / 763-593-8109 (fax) To: Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals From: Emily Goellner, Associate Planner/Grant Writer Melissa Sonnek, Planning Intern Subject: 3107 Lee Avenue North Joshua Counihan, Applicant Joshua Counihan, owner of the property at 3107 Lee Avenue North, is seeking a set of 3 variances from the City Code to replace the existing one stall garage with a two stall garage that includes additional storage space. The new garage is proposed as 26 feet in width and 36 feet in depth. Side Yard Setback A variance from the side yard setback requirement is necessary on this property in order to build a two stall garage. The existing garage is located 19.41 feet from the south property line. It is 14.3 feet wide and 28.4 feet deep. If the request is approved, the new garage would be located 7.26 feet from the south property line. The neighboring home to the south is located approximately 13 feet from the property line. Front Yard Setback In order to build a 36 foot deep garage that aligns with the existing rear garage wall, the applicant is requesting a variance from the front yard setback. This design would also allow the front of the garage to align with a future entryway addition. The entryway as it is drawn on the site plan requires an additional variance to the front yard setback. The applicant is not requesting a variance to build the entryway addition at this time. It is noted in the application that the front wall of the home is not parallel to the front property line. Articulation The applicant has requested a waiver from the side wall articulation requirement. The applicant notes that the garage would contain articulation along the front wall instead. The proposal requires variances from the following sections of City Code: Section 11.21, Single Family Zoning District, Subd. 11(A)(2) Front Yard Setback Requirements: The minimum front yard (east) setback requirement is 35 feet. The applicant is requesting a variance of 1.33 feet off of the required 35 feet to a distance of 33.67 feet at its closest point to the front yard (west) property line. Section 11.21, Single Family Zoning District, Subd. 11(A)(3) Side Yard Setback Requirements: The minimum side yard (south) setback requirement is 25 feet. The Applicant is requesting a variance of 7.74 feet off of the required 15 feet to a distance of 7.26 feet at its closest point to the side yard (south) property line. Section 11.21, Single Family Zoning District, Subd. 11(D) Side Wall Articulation: Any resulting side wall longer than 32 feet in length must be articulated, with a shift of at least 2 feet in depth for at least 8 feet in length for every 32 feet of wall. The applicant is requesting a waiver from this requirement in order to build a 36 foot long wall on the western side of the home without articulation. Staff Recommendation: In reviewing this application, staff has maintained the points of examination to the considerations outlined in Minnesota State Statute 462.357, requiring that a property exhibit "practical difficulties" in order for a variance to be granted. To constitute practical difficulties, the property owner must propose to use the property in a reasonable manner, the landowners' problem must be due to circumstances unique to the property not caused by the landowner, and that the variance, if granted, must not alter the essential character of the locality. City staff recognizes that this property is unique in that the buildable area to the south of the existing structure is limited and the construction of a second garage stall requires a variance. However, there are reasonable options that reduce the impact on the character of the locality. Staff recommends that the applicant meet the front yard setback of 35 feet, decrease the width of the garage to a maximum of 24 feet, and incorporate articulation into the design of the garage. Staff finds this to be a more reasonable use of the property and would better preserve the character of the surrounding neighborhood. Side Yard Setback Staff recommends denial of the request for a variance of 7.74 feet off of the required 15 feet to a distance of 7.26 feet at its closest point to the side yard (south) property line; however staff recommends approval of a request that allows the applicant to build a two car garage that is 24 feet in width rather than 26 feet in width. Therefore, staff recommends approval of a request for a side yard variance of 5.74 off of the required 15 feet to a distance of 9.26 at its closest point to the side yard (south) property line. Front Yard Setback Staff recommends denial of the request for a variance of 1.33 feet off of the required 35 feet to a distance of 33.67 feet at its closest point to the front yard (east) property line. The proposed setback is a design option preferred by the landowner, but staff finds that the owner/applicant can explore other options that eliminate the need for this variance. The uniqueness of this property does not necessitate a variance to the front yard setback requirement. Other options include reducing the depth of the 36 foot garage by 1.5 feet or by moving the garage in order to meet the front yard setback requirement. Articulation Staff recommends denial of the request for a waiver from the side wall articulation requirement in order to build a 36 foot wall on the eastern side of the home without articulation. A waiver to the articulation requirement would alter the essential character of the locality and that the uniqueness of this property does not necessitate a waiver to the articulation requirement. Staff finds that the applicant can explore other options that eliminate the need for this variance such as a cantilever or a reduction in the depth of the garage to 32 feet. 3200 3126 3120 3114 3100 3026 3016 3000 3201 1 1 3200 3135 3126 Subject Property 3125 3115 3114 3101 3100 3025 3024 3017 452C 4600 2944 3200 3201 3135 3134 312 5 3124 3114 •3107 3100 3039 r 3048 m A 3025 Z 3036 4500 3024 3000 3201 1 3135 3125 3115 J0, C�ty of go lden�f valley Zoning Code Variance Application 1. Street address: Arch M1 %toLoe+� A"uO 1MtJ SSq I -Z- 2. Applicant Information: Name: TosiiAuA- C,00A.-J #*� Address: I oil LGrE A-iV 0 60,06-1-1 Email Address: G 0C7Aj1C3 (nM ►L • COM Phone Number: 76-3 — Z136` %937 3. Provide a detailed description of the variance(s) being requested: 6F C,,A?etd- GF G 7.26 ` F1em 56arrl llte� L4rjz! .F>olL.a �cv,�r vjk,, v1 6Ae.A,4,o 6, 35-&7 Fp-anA cwr Ckpfp-T-t �ws Swd+a\1 11,21 S.r3�7�w�sina 11- P*Kr b- s+a314*" 4A71(,ut,A-r1Or3, AjO �i 1571G v L ►6ti F V OL 5 (P P Ow, (, OF 6►++wh &-g 3 & ' i,.3 4. Provide a detailed description of need for a variance from the Zoning Code, including: • Description of building(s) • Description of proposed addition(s) • Description of proposed alteration(s) to property OF ktt'W70 6%Aw 2A -L.0 . O ew 6,kt&eaff w 1 t 4, Ect� (A[ Oso ib SCINY N f (Zoc7u'&T4 L1a1+3" f�/NST f�Koj'�R�f L►a�' LJE 51 D 3 Int Ail, car- ZLJ:f (_,,A.2A-W ss 3 6 rA3 L&Nt W,6 42 Nt o /4 ,-rt L O �- A-Tt oo-) o tj i�i S ov M-4, 4�S i tks zs �- G A f2A-G. li; i5 nio� T t c r� z, ti A GhI�lr� io 4�Ajjf Axi AyTlc- JLATcPM. F40#-�T WA -LA- V AitI AcIJ yS ied(Q D FOfL �Oer 31e Fvrvjet K4va .0 /�aD►�,o�,a @ ['-Kosv IJTRy • Tk f etb-r OF I�vJSE� 6 .trtrE t:+i A-Ae4 AkmT Pk-AAU aL To T Ko.,T PRE�,,,Kj y' 5. Minnesota State Statute 462.357 requires that a property exhibit "practical difficulties" in order for LtNp a variance to be considered. Practical Difficulties: W 1q ry-pt7 g Ai-w4vs' D VA -k A -n ee • result in a use that is reasonable. kT 50 LOewet of: cu,-Rma R kmD I , 33 � r3t� � �1i Ci w � c3 • are based on a problem that is unique to the property. o(� Il,)'�„� t:�rzk�. YE�►S �q�Gt� • are not caused by the landowner. er &AKA-c.P IAkoLL U) &"a t3e • do not alter the essential character of the locality. FA-CA�- a r f�T. QK Vm i, To demonstrate how your request will comply with Minnesota State Statute 462.357, please respond to the following questions: Explain the need for your variance request and how it will result in a reasonable use of the property. lih Cu N 1 l !�7'� ftF� D CSA a� C.cy►� u. I�LI.ewJ CLQ Grams TO ga 1?~fj .T.nrr ►tea. �:C.A�It,B w I� Lso f,►nn nr re c' k)G'170 h7R. %`Cm jav,-cLIA1, -ro IPL- - A Slims mw T+t; (jOPO;vqz1• What is unique about your property and how do you feel that it necessitates a variance? 40it 6' Is Nor o v w�F s I' rro� /k Tus a a�u, ATTA,-OeD C�a &OTW 6,Ftj f6�xer 4 SOOT4 Explain how the need for a variance is based on circumstances that are not a result of a landowner action. oA,16,1tj4-t. STP, VG-ruP t� 445 OtJO Oa011-L9 *#Jb Zs L -v -�,myo 5dL� T' ,k -T" A-uDIot, A 15ez-o,jD -5-1A-LL Um LP- oA�-, 4tf5 ©N 50 a -rt ?KVPMTI LiNtir Explain how, if granted, the proposed variance will not alter the essential character of your neighborhood and Golden Valley as a whole. I tc rJ G Pn c.�s 0 1 u. &W( Cts tm p r2 vyA l S &- F- C u &L U(-A-TVRd "1�e1 S r W i L -k- &Dc> A; ,,J AR:n c, e l�r-Tr o N i o rt{,- FRor.rr o IF TN'F 40 tl `r F- f" L U 0,15 WP LSA -L + 0 0 e" Fe" USe-cv ZS Ar Fooj ercw- UP GiRk1>gS SN Oop- lj a� 1 64g&Kt4 OD, 6. The City requests that you consider all available project options that are permitted by the Zoning Code prior to requesting a variance. The Board of Zoning Appeals will discuss alternative options to seeking variance with you at the public hearing. Please describe alternate ways to do your project that do not require variances to the Zoning Code. 3 o,L t> D TA -e- o &, cue :i7 , yll" w rT►4 m 3,�cLt 5vlku-e�- G,AO-A4_0 &TrA-c OreO, Rt�v►� �rc� S(-v&&,tL VAA--[vim 1 �d -ro '13J,LD 5�PI 7. Please submit a current survey of your property. You must indicate the proposed addition, including new proposed building and structure setbacks, on the survey. A copy of Golden Valley's survey requirements is available upon request. Please note that this application is considered incomplete without the submittal of a current property survey. 8. Please submit at least one current color photograph of the area affected by the proposed variance. You may attach a printed photograph to this application, or you may email a digital image to planning@goldenvalleymn.gov. You may submit additional photographs as needed. To the best of my knowledge the statements found in this application are true and correct. l also understand that unless construction of the action applicable to this variance request, if granted, is not taken within one year, the variance expires. I have considered all options afforded to me through the City's Zoning Code, and feel that there is no alternate way to achieve my objective except to seek a variance to zoning rules and regulations. I give permission for Golden Valley staff, as well as members of the Board of Zoning Appeals, to enter my property prior to the public hearing to inspect the area affected by this request. — <21- A=:Z� Sign ure of Applicant If the applicant is not the owner of all property involved in this application, please name the owner of this property: Print Name of owner Signature of owner X $200 Application Fee Attached (for Single Family Residential) $300 Application Fee Attached (for all other Zoning Districts) Please note: The City of Golden Valley will send notice of your variance request to all adjoining property owners as well as owners of properties directly across streets or alleys. Your neighbors have the right to address the Board of Zoning Appeals at your public hearing. You are advised to personally contact your neighbors and explain your project to them prior to the public hearing. ?fv- *Alb� pr a !' �' M1r`5 - -•. "3 "i -}SAN 'y,�L,'�' t el 0 r� r I i ■ t• tsi t f � - 4,4 ,.lCl'. rl,? �• "y , �° e S` -r: � �• �_# i , �, "`'III '��„�►' , d .� +, � y � � ,k �• t� ; � - � i it � •��, r,' ' tr1 ;'int k tw E A� 1 40 -'r�'';a � � .tea _ �� � 'T�t { '•' ,�� .( � ' • ,: �'+� � *, ♦ v «PP �� Ld J O( w � U w 'm co Q C)-) J O z z 0 w 11 � w o C W LL 2 a J 0 >- z I _ Y z w z v a W w or - m 0 Li Lc)p Z Q Z Q J a p = U 0 Z W w O UJ F_ W z F O O p m cq U w �J—n D Y � ��� � ? � r c/) cn cQ 0 w w Z F w `- w W W W W W W W W W (n a U) J J Ill 0 ).)ni -3 W O LLJ U F F F F- F F F- F F a U-- F> o OLi ° I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 _ w Z) LL (Fj a Q O ? w w w w w w w w w U z F 2 X U W - w o❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑ z w w O w a o ° � Q a) w W> ow ZO'=zU) > (n N J I m Q w F O w N a Cn LL. N I ��cn�j W J F? 0OOF a'C) ¢ W 00 Ld + I p ®(90 IlJ @ J W J 00 z00 prp m (� U I >_ QQ N 0�(nUw WOJ�� I �_00 a) z'6 V WO=W��Ld _❑W� i z Y c I U p W Z N �UFG_ W �FZZ)n 3 U ° U Z Li Z W N ow lFL J W o O z U) LU _ z0 z 0 m o 0Q (J H Qmw��=F0Lu 0Q o v Q 0_ 0 U 0' > Z W O p LL- ��OV W F U- zUQ�,ZO(D W QFJ F}- CO F Lai ULLJ a Z 0D rn 0Q �tnrn w2��LU �Z0Q) w G= N Z CL j J w (n Oe � � F � ,� � W 11 _ (n O U Cn w� WE X w M O n 00 w w❑ O❑ m o AVO LU (w�a �Pmwjo}>z0 M n G X_ F a UJ ❑ U rnC) U� J W aCn-,XOM W 0 a _ a U` U` W W LL a ❑ 4— co FiNa Q �p (�UaJUJZ FQF 00 w ❑ N a Z Z a = = = w OJ c0 F�-+O= m Y.< aF ZF�Q(n=�ZFQz F (O_j u~J p z w w w r �-+'�-- o U>0 r)LL CO LL 00 E W z3:n0ownm0�0 Ow m F w w 0 0 Lz-i 2i a Q, c WZz W w �J�IFi� mz0OaO❑�mw> o 0 w w J w w w w w w w ~�� �z F O 0 M o �O�WOw dU CK o cn cn a cn cn cn cn cn cn cn o f (7 w E' Z l N W J w= F D F F a F F F F F F F U a �Q z �aU W(nF „ 11 - 0 Q F w m� O X O O 0 0= 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (!� o W000_ (�o Uwp , zUJX W cn0F 71zm>OCSw 3 m Z w= w w w w W w w W 7 1� W J Z W of 0❑ Q (� W a' H U Q= m o Z '❑ oaa U' ' -w OLLzO���2cn00 0 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Q�U z= m UF= 01- 0_ cn -- a J— z w LJiI Q 11 � ow aO� OZ ZOZ ZC� Q W w�ZQ> co W (Fjz i L� o Waz Q- J- QZw i/�mataFc�aUc�az W m a w W, L5r c 2 G4Wa fxa_i ai�U �z� Ww�FFU)rw❑>>zz 00 m a', a W o oL WJ0 <4X XOX ,D00 E"FOOpUJ=aww0¢ W I X L= SwF xw wFw pg1.I= O N�z�a2cncn0a z - N N 0 LO 6tS _ z Z Z = w r.J Srs O a w > J W ►�j V �y 0 o o Z 0 O 270 q v ° p I R n/R=2g84'3 y . ' .1 a ow =105.33pmz 5-31 a a b . N V) v °p 1 ua :9V) ° slS 0, vJ Z ° 'Q m (� w 1 sl9 I n ,7 �' N Z< a fsxM ; a a° 1' 7 �< o 1 O I J X 9 _ O)o O W M Z 1..1..x'I ib 1'7 w C.15 1 5 OZ U AY 1 } w 0 916 x N o� I I 1 1 est w a 0r z ir WIF i ass 70.4 M �1 a r 22.76 I- - ao w rn \ 1 1 ! s a r ° a O a 1 12.43 q I am 0) 0r, 1 x Q 1915 oz �rn orn N 1 1 NW O Ln — w I � Sl I co FZ)rnr xLa N _U g 0 914 1 N Ix�w0 a� 1 �' �J LO N= orfs I \ w J 26.8 \ Q 1 1co 00LD a � F ° ° N st j X13.1 14.3 X �S'B c'I6 v o 1 1 M -- 24. -- I o 1 W I o ma )D 11.5 W pi 1 Go wo 116 11 1 Z =a �/1 1 LJ - 016 f6° 16.2 15.3 1 Si LLJI 1 1 0'606 I II 1 a 5 I I(0I `'a q 0011 j5� 1 w � a Lin I O o J X w 5LA.1'' 1 o L c U I O Ln In , , \ £rs \ A W I �� N w I o W q 1 W ° C3 � 04 L �Il.r' °6 I 2 S! --e --f--- c�lsx q r� fs a X w \ I / F ° w Xz a Q <'o I M Pl 313 W 6 �9 �0� ° a 9 N ° 31 i I ° Q _ ° ° ° °° A os w os N