Loading...
2016-01-25 EC Minutes GOLDEN VALLEY ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION Regular Meeting, Minutes January 25, 2016 Commissioners Present: Lynn Gitelis, Dawn Hill, Tracy Anderson, Debra Yahle, Tonia Galonska, Staff Present: Eric Eckman, Public Works Specialist and Claire Huisman, Administrative Assistant Absent: Commissioners Larry Johnson and Jim Stremel Call to Order Lynn Gitelis called the meeting to order at 6:30 pm. Approval of ReQular Commission Meetinct Minutes MOVED by Hill, SECONDED by Yahle, and the motion carried unanimously to approve the minutes of the December 14, 2015 regular meeting. Blue Line LRT Municipal Consent Discussion Planning Manager, Jason Zimmerman gave a brief presentation on the progress of the Blue Line LRT. He presented a map which showed the layout of the tracks through Golden Valley and provided information on the next phase of the project. Golden Valley's Open House and Public Hearing for Municipal Consent is set for the Feb. 2�d City Council meeting. Action on the plans is anticipated at the regular City Council meeting of Feb. 16, 2016. It was noted that Metro Transit will maintain and police the line and stations. Blue Line LRT Recommendation to the Council The Environmental Commission discussed the Blue Line LRT project, and formulated its position and recommendation to the Council regarding the municipal consent plans. The Commission reviewed the plans, but due to a lack of environmental data the Commission felt it was not in a position to recommend a Yes vote on the project at this time, and looks forward to reviewing the data when the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) is complete. The full recommendation can be found in the Council agenda packet for the February 2, 2016 meeting, located at: http://weblink-int/weblink/0/doc/521990/Page1.aspx 2016 Work Plan Chair Gitelis and Eckman discussed with the Commission the Minnesota GreenStep Cities Program. This voluntary program includes 29 best practices, a database for completing a comprehensive inventory of the city's current environmental initiatives, provides benchmarks and per#ormance metrics to measure success, and a forum for sharing information with peer cities. The program's 29 best practices and various levels of recognition provide a framework for the Commission to identify and prioritize future projects and activities. There are four steps of recognition in the Program. Step One is for cities that have passed a city resolution, posted information on the GreenStep website, indicated which best practices they initially plan to implement, and described best practices already implemented. Benefits of the program to the city include: helping cities achieve their sustainability and quality of life goals; saving city staff time in researching cost-effective actions for cutting energy use; saving cities money and G:\Environmental Commission\Minutes�2016\1-January\012516 Minutes.doc Minutes of the Environmental Commission January 25, 2016 Page 2 of 3 offering environmental, social and financial benefits; providing leadership and action roles for community members and institutions; etc. The Commission decided to include the GreenStep Cities Program in its 2016 work plan and recommended that staff draft a resolution of participation for the City Council to consider at a future meeting. The draft resolution will be reviewed by the Commission at its March 2016 meeting before forwarding to Council. Home Enerqv Squad Enhanced The City had participated in this home energy program in the past, but not the last few years. The Commission felt that the City's financial support of this program would not only help residents make energy improvements and preserve home values, but would also tie in well with the GreenStep Cities Program. MOVED by Hill, SECONDED by Galonska to recommend that staff include the Home Energy Squad Enhanced Program in the 2017 budget at the contribution level of$50 per home visit (approximately $3,200-$4,800 annually) and to further explore the possibility of offering this service to small businesses and multi- family homes in the future. Proqram/Proiect Updates The complete program/project summary is on file. Eckman provided additional verbal updates on the Long-Term Flood Damage Reduction study for Medicine Lake Road & Winnetka Avenue Area which includes the DeCola Ponds neighborhood. Staff from the three cities and Hennepin County will be meeting to discuss the study and cost scenarios. Commission members requested that these meetings be open to the public and/or to have an opportunity for residents to meet and discuss the project before the final report is presented to the Council. Commission members also stressed the importance of communication between the City and residents in the Decola Ponds neighborhood. Eckman discussed the tentative schedule leading up to the final report and the opportunity for neighborhood input. It is anticipated that a draft report will be taken to Council in April with a neighborhood meeting scheduled around that same time. Staff also reported that there have been ongoing conversations with a number of residents who have called or emailed staff with questions during the past month. Adiourn MOVED by Anderson, SECONDED by Hill, and the motion carried to adjourn the meeting at 8:45 pm. C��GLL-'�L� /�V L'��-+.>/y�J'�y� Claire Huisman G:\Environmental Commission\Minutes�2016\1-January\012516 Minutes.doc