The URL can be used to link to this page

04-20-17 CC Agenda Packet (entire)AGENDA Regular Meeting of the City Council Golden Valley City Hall 7800 Golden Valley Road Council Chamber April 20, 2017 6:30 pm 1.CALL TO ORDER PAGES A.Pledge of Allegiance B.Roll Call 2.ADDITIONS AND CORRECTIONS TO AGENDA 3.CONSENT AGENDA Approval of Consent Agenda - All items listed under this heading are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no discussion of these items unless a Council Member so requests in which event the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda. A.Approval of Minutes - City Council Meeting April 4, 2017 2-4 B.Approval of City Check Register 5 C.Licenses: 1. Approve Amendment to Chester Bird American Legion’s Liquor License Premises 6 2. Approve General License - Refuse/Recycling Vehicles 7 3. Therapeutic Massage Facility License - True Blue Massage and Bodywork 8 D.Minutes: 1. Planning Commission - March 27, 2017 9-18 2. Human Services Fund - March 13, 2017 19 3. Open Space & Recreation Commission - February 27, 2017 20-21 E.Approval of Amendments to Employee Handbook 17-19 22-26 F.Authorize Upgrades to Traffic Signals 27-30 G.Receipt of March 2017 Financial Reports 31-41 H.2016 Positive Performance-General Fund Transfer and Assignment of Fund Balance 17-20 42-46 4.PUBLIC HEARINGS 5.OLD BUSINESS 6.NEW BUSINESS A.Announcement of Meetings 1. Future Draft Agendas: City Council May 2, 2017, Council/Manager May 9, 2017 and City Council May 16, 2017 47-49 B.Mayor and Council Communications 7.ADJOURNMENT UNOFFICIAL MINUTES CITY COUNCIL MEETING GOLDEN VALLEY, MINNESOTA April 4, 2017 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Harris called the meeting to order at 6:30 pm. 1A. Pledge of Allegiance 1B. Roll Call Present: Mayor Shep Harris, Council Members Joanie Clausen, Larry Fonnest, Andy Snope and Steve Schmidgall. Also present were: City Manager Cruikshank, City Attorney Barnard and City Clerk Luedke. 1C. Recognize City Attorney Allen Barnard for his Years of Service to the City of Golden Valley Mayor Harris presented retiring City Attorney Allen Barnard several gifts for his years of service to the City of Golden Valley. Former Golden Valley City Council Member, State Representative Mike Freiberg congratulated Mr. Barnard on his retirement. The Council thanked City Attorney Barnard for his years of dedicated service to the City of Golden Valley. 2. ADDITIONS AND CORRECTIONS TO AGENDA MOTION made by Council Member Schmidgall, seconded by Council Member Clausen to approve the agenda of April 4, 2017 as submitted and the motion carried. 3. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA MOTION made by Council Member Clausen, seconded by Council Member Fonnest to approve the consent agenda of April 4, 2017, as revised: removal of 3F-METRO Blue Line Extension Business Advisory Committee Appointments and the motion carried. 3A.Approve Minutes of the City Council Meeting of March 21, 2017. 3B. Approve City Check Register and authorize the payment of the bills as submitted. 3C1.Approve requests for beer and/or wine at Brookview Park as recommended by staff. 3D.Accept for filing the Minutes of Boards and Commissions as follows: 1. Planning Commission - February 27 2. Special Planning Commission - March 13, 2017 3. Human Right Commission - December 27, 2016 4. Human Service Fund - February 13, 2017 5. Environmental Commission - February 27, 2017 6. Joint Water Commission - January 4, 2017 7. Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission - January 19 and February 16, 2017 3E1.Authorizing a contract with UHL Company, Inc. in the amount of $33,100 for the Public Safety Building HVAC System Upgrade Project No. 16-08. 3F.METRO Blue Line Extension - Business Advisory Committee Appointments. Unofficial City Council Minutes -2- April 4, 2017 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA 3F. METRO Blue Line Extension - Business Advisory Council Appointments Physical Development Nevinski answered questions from Council regarding the Business Advisory Committee appointments. MOTION made by Council Member Snope, seconded by Council Member Clausen to reappoint Alison Pence and Ben Colglazier to the METRO Blue Line Extension Business Advisory Committee and the motion carried. 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS 6. NEW BUSINESS 6A. Authorization to Sign Amendment to Legal Services Agreement with Best & Flanagan City Manager Cruikshank presented the staff report and answered questions from Council. City Attorney Barnard answered questions from Council. MOTION made by Council Member Clausen, seconded by Council Member Fonnest to authorize the City Manager to sign the Amendment to the Legal Services Agreement between the City of Golden Valley and Best & Flanagan LLP for City Attorney Services and the motion carried. 6B. Announcement of Meetings Some Council Members may attend the PRISM Lunch (Preserving Affordable Housing) on April 5, 2017, at noon at PRISM located at 730 Florida Avenue South. Some Council Members may attend the Reneu Sport & Health Ribbon Cutting on April 6, 2017, from 4 to 4:30 pm at 8401 Golden Valley Road, Suite 301. Some Council Members may attend the Planning Commission’s Comp Plan Conversation on Housing on April 12, 2017, from 6 to 7:30 pm in the Council Chambers. The next Housing and Redevelopment Authority meeting will be held on April 13, 2017, at 6:30 pm. The next Council/Manager meeting will be held on April 13, 2017, immediately following the HRA meeting. A Council Security training will be held on April 13, 2017, immediately following the Council/Manager meeting. Some Council Members may attend Congressman Ellison’s Civic 101 Forum on April 19, 2017, from 6:30 to 8:30 pm in the Council Chambers. Some Council Members may attend the Jewish Family Council Service/PRISM New Building Project Kick-off meeting on April 20, 2017, from 11 am to noon at PRISM located at 730 Florida Avenue. Unofficial City Council Minutes -3- April 4, 2017 6B. Announcement of Meetings - continued Some Council Members may attend the Metro Cities Annual meeting on April 20, 2017, at 5:30 pm at the University Club located at 420 Summit Avenue in St. Paul. The next Council Quarterly Review session will be held on April 20, 2017, at 5:30 pm in the Council Conference room. The next City Council meeting will be held on April 20, 2017, at 6:30 pm. Some Council Members may attend the Golden Valley Business Council meeting on April 27, 2017, from 7:30 to 9 am at Second Harvest Heartland located at 6325 Sandburg Road. Some Council members may attend an Open House for Cornerstone Creek on April 27, 2017, from 11:30 am to 1 pm at Cornerstone Creek located at 9280 Golden Valley Road. Some Council Members may attend the Golden Valley Run the Valley Race/Walk on April 29, 2017, beginning at 7:45 am at the Davis Community Center at Meadowbrook School located at 5430 Glenwood Avenue. 6C. Mayor and Council Communication No action and/or discussion took place. 7.ADJOURNMENT MOTION made by Council Member Snope, seconded by Council Member Clausen and the motion carried to adjourn the meeting at 7:02 pm. _______________________________ Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: __________________________ Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting April 20, 2017 Agenda Item 3. B. Approval of City Check Register Prepared By Sue Virnig, Finance Director Summary Approval of the check register for various vendor claims against the City of Golden Valley. Attachments •Document sent via email Recommended Action Motion to authorize the payment of the bills as submitted. Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting April 20, 2017 Agenda Item 3. C. 1. Amendment to Club and Sunday Liquor License Premises for Chester Bird American Legion Prepared By Kris Luedke, City Clerk Summary Chester Bird American Legion located at 200 North Lilac Drive has made a request to the City for an amendment to their Club and Sunday liquor license to add an outdoor patio on their premises. The Legion is will be installing a 4’ vinyl coated chain link fence around the patio area. All requirements have been met with the Inspections Department. Recommended Action Motion to approve the amendment to the Club and Sunday Liquor License premises for Chester Bird American Legion, 200 Lilac Drive. Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting April 20, 2017 Agenda Item 3. C. 2. General Business Licenses Prepared By Shannon Dietrich, Administrative Assistant Summary As per City Code, some businesses are required to be licensed by the City. Listed below are the license number, applicant name and address, license type and fee of those who have submitted an application for approval. #9435 Allied Waste Services 11 Refuse Vehicles $ 550.00 9813 Flying Cloud Drive #9431 Allied Waste Services 10 Recycling Vehicle $ 500.00 9813 Flying Cloud Drive Recommended Action Motion to authorize the issuance of licenses as recommended by staff. Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting April 20, 2017 Agenda Item 3. C. 3. Therapeutic Massage Facility License - True Blue Massage and Bodywork Prepared By Jason Sturgis, Chief of Police Jeff Johnson, Sergeant Summary True Blue Massage and Bodywork, located at 8421 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 230 has applied for a massage facility license. Documents submitted by the applicant indicate that True Blue Massage is owned by Tatyana Vecherkova of Plymouth, Minnesota. True Blue Massage and Bodywork will be sub-leasing a room within Andrashko Chiropractic. A background investigation of Ms. Vecherkova including record checks been completed. The applicant meets City Code requirements for the issuance of a massage facility license. Recommended Action Motion to approve the issuance of a Therapeutic Massage Facility License for True Blue Massage and Bodywork located at 8421 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 230. Regular Meeting of the Golden Valley Planning Commission March 27, 2017 A regular meeting of the Planning Commission was held at the Golden Valley City Hall, Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota, on Monday, March 27, 2017. Chair Segelbaum called the meeting to order at 7 pm. Those present were Planning Commissioners Blenker, Johnson, Kluchka, Segelbaum, and Waldhauser. Also present were Planning Manager Jason Zimmerman, Associate Planner/Grant Writer Emily Goellner, and Administrative Assistant Lisa Wittman. Commissioners Baker and Blum were absent. 1. Approval of Minutes February 27, 2017, Regular Planning Commission Meeting MOVED by Waldhauser, seconded by Johnson and motion carried unanimously to approve the February 27, 2017, minutes as submitted. March 13, 2017, Special Planning Commission Meeting MOVED by Blenker, seconded by Johnson and motion carried unanimously to approve the March 13, 2017, minutes as submitted. 2. Continued Comp Plan Discussion – Land Use Zimmerman stated that this is a continuation from the last Planning Commission meeting regarding land use where the discussion included the I-394 Corridor Planning District, and the Douglas Drive/Duluth Street Planning District. This meeting will focus on the Downtown West Planning District and the Golden Valley Road Light Rail Station Area. He reminded the Commissioners of some of the themes in the Comp Plan including: supporting a dynamic town center, showcasing Golden Valley as a “green” community, emphasizing all aspects of a multi-modal transportation system, striving to be inclusive with population and housing, and making important investments in infrastructure. Waldhauser asked if the theme of striving to be inclusive includes economic inclusiveness in terms of a range in housing costs. Zimmerman said yes, and added that it also includes senior housing and racial diversity among other things. Kluchka asked if the theme regarding sustainability will also include the resilience term that has recently started. Zimmerman said yes, there will be a chapter in the Comp Plan regarding sustainability and resilience. Waldhauser said she likes that resilience of the business community and the employment opportunities it provides is included under the sustainability and resilience umbrella. Zimmerman referred to a map of the proposed Downtown West Planning District and discussed the borders of the district, areas that have potential to change, and properties that are unlikely to redevelop. He stated that he is looking for the Commission’s feedback Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission March 27, 2017 Page 2 on the boundaries of the proposed district and what uses they would like to encourage or prohibit. Kluchka referred to the southwest corner of Highway 55 and Winnetka Ave. and suggested that it be added to Downtown West Planning District. He questioned if there is an opportunity for the City, rather than a developer, to develop that underutilized property with some type of public amenity. Zimmerman explained that some federal money went into securing that corner of Brookview Park so there may be some limitations in what can be developed there. Zimmerman continued discussing the proposed Downtown West Planning District and noted that the properties marked with an X have had fairly significant investments made, they likely won’t change, or it is the right kind of use in its location. He highlighted areas that are more likely to change starting with the southeast corner of Highway 55 and Winnetka Ave. He stated that during the last Comp Plan update this area was re- designated to allow higher density residential but when it came to rezoning the area, it was ultimately decided to revise the Comp Plan back to low density residential. He said there has been some discussion since regarding the best use for this corner and explained that a more dense residential development could make sense in this location but there are some limitations due to some traffic concerns especially with commercial uses or a typical multi-family building. A senior use with some sort of assisted living could work because the traffic counts would be low enough to get additional density without putting too much extra strain on that intersection. Segelbaum asked if staff is looking for feedback on both land use and zoning. Zimmerman said just land use at this time because the rezoning of properties comes at a later date. Segelbaum asked about the current land use designation of the southeast corner of Highway 55 and Winnetka. Zimmerman said the land use designation is low density and the parcels are zoned Single Family (R-1) Residential. Segelbaum asked if staff is suggesting that the area is appropriate for higher density. Zimmerman said yes, but if the consensus is that the area should stay low density then it doesn’t need to be included in the boundary of the proposed planning district. Waldhauser asked if the current designation allows both R-1 and R-2 zoned properties. Zimmerman said yes. Zimmerman next referred to the area within the Downtown West Planning District that includes Cornerstone Creek and Hello Apartments and the properties along Golden Valley Road closer to Highway 169. He said there have been discussions about that area being a mixed use/flexible area where there could be some medium or high density residential uses mixed in amongst office or neighborhood level commercial uses. He stated that staff feels this is an area where these types of uses makes sense. Zimmerman referred to another area within the Downtown West Planning District that could also be designated for mixed or flexible uses. This area includes the parcels bounded by Wisconsin Avenue North on the west, 10 th Avenue on the north, Winnetka Avenue on the east and Bassett Creek on the south. This area could also be a good area for some residential uses because it is close to downtown and walkable. Zimmerman noted that the Wells Fargo and Park Nicollet parcels may also be more likely to change Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission March 27, 2017 Page 3 than some of the other parcels in the area and he would like some feedback regarding uses that might work for these properties. Zimmerman referred to an area along Boone Avenue and Bassett Creek, south of 10 th Avenue that currently consists of Light Industrial and Office uses and said he would like feedback on whether this area should stay as it is or if some other uses should be allowed in the City’s Light Industrial and Industrial zoning districts but keeping it a buffer between the heavier industrial uses to the west and the downtown area. The last area Zimmerman discussed is the Post Office site. He stated that staff hasn’t heard that the Post Office is leaving, but it is a large site that could potentially be used for Commercial or Office uses. Waldhauser noted that the parcels west of Decatur have not been discussed. Zimmerman stated that much of the City’s Industrial base is in that area and that staff may recommend some adjustments to the types of uses allowed in that area, but probably not to the land use designations. Segelbaum asked what Downtown West means and if calling the area Downtown West connotes that it is a combination of many different uses or if it means there is a retail use. Zimmerman explained that as development has occurred along Golden Valley Road with Hello and Cornerstone Creek there has been the desire to connect the area to the traditional downtown Golden Valley area with sidewalks and other public improvements. Segelbaum asked the Commissioners how they felt about the proposed boundaries for the Downtown West Planning District. Waldhauser said she likes the proposed boundaries and thinks it is a good way to focus on a contiguous area. Blenker said she was surprised to see the residential area south of Highway 55 included but it makes sense to include it in the discussion. She referred to the triangular-shaped parcel on the far eastern side of the district that is a Commercial use and asked why that isn’t included within the boundaries of the proposed district. Zimmerman said that is the Schuller’s property which is a Commercial use in a Residential Zoning District. Waldhauser suggested it be included in the district, Blenker agreed. Zimmerman explained that it is currently considered non-conforming. He stated that it is a difficult parcel and because of its triangular shape it has two front setbacks. He added that if Schuller’s were to leave, it would be a residential property. Kluchka said he wants the boundary to extend to the southwest corner of Highway 55 and Winnetka Avenue and he would advocate for high density residential where Schuller’s is now located. Segelbaum said it seems that the consensus of the Commission is that the proposed boundaries are fine. Johnson said he is wondering about the impact of high density residential on a neighboring area and how it changes the composition of an area. He also asked about the market demand for Industrial buildings. Zimmerman said the City is seeing more vacancies in the Light Industrial properties and that Industrial properties seem to be more stable. He explained that the Economic Development section of the Comp Plan will focus on these types of issues. Waldhauser said she thinks that surrounding development raises land value. She added that businesses might move elsewhere and ask for their Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission March 27, 2017 Page 4 properties to be rezoned if it becomes more valuable, but as long as businesses think their location is important to them they’ll stay. Zimmerman referred to the properties on the southeast corner of Highway 55 and Winnetka Avenue. He reiterated that those properties were guided for Medium Density Residential during the last Comp Plan update. There was some pushback to leave them guided for Low Density so the area was re-designated and rezoned back to Low Density Residential and R-1 Single Family Residential. He said he would like to discuss revisiting the option of higher density in this area because the City Council has said they like the idea of making the area more supportive of people who can walk, bike and shop in the downtown area. Waldhauser said her recollection is that there was an objection to higher density senior housing because it is not really walkable to downtown because of the difficulty in getting across Highway 55. She said she doesn’t know if progress has been made with making it easier to get across Winnetka Avenue or Highway 55. She added that the other objection is the traffic issues with anything higher density than R-2 so it seems that R-2 is as high as the density can go on these properties. Kluchka said he doesn’t have an issue leaving the properties as they currently are, but there are senior developments that could be viable in this location such as highly assisted people and people with memory care needs who don’t necessarily drive or are able to walk to the downtown shops. Segelbaum asked about the land use designation for that type of use. Zimmerman said it would probably be designated Medium Density with a bonus for seniors. Waldhauser said that could create a high rise building over six stories in height and that residential neighbors do not like that. Blenker said she likes that the area is walkable to downtown, it’s protected from the other lower density areas, and has amenities like the parks nearby. She said it seems reasonable to increase the density on these properties. Kluchka said he would be interested in hearing opinions from senior housing developers about this area. Zimmerman said the City has talked to some developers, but there has been resistance to sell and rezone the properties. Waldhauser said it seems that if the goal is to support downtown businesses a senior development with residents who aren’t very mobile might not be the best use. Segelbaum said it seems the consensus for the land use designation in this area would be Medium-Low Density. Zimmerman referred to the area furthest west in the proposed district along Golden Valley Road. He said that a type of flexible zoning might work in this area and would allow neighborhood commercial, office, and R-3 to R-4 housing. Kluchka asked if the purpose in creating a new land use concept is to make it easier to change and as good ideas come to the City, they won’t have to go through the process of rezoning or re-designating property with every proposal. Zimmerman said yes. Waldhauser said a mixed or flexible use in this area seems to make sense especially with the new higher density projects that are being built. Kluchka agreed and said he likes the opportunity of making a downtown walkable loop with wayfinding signs and a comprehensive walking plan. Johnson said he supports a flexible use in this area and that it could become an interesting adjunct to downtown especially with places to shop and eat. Zimmerman referred to the area north of Bassett Creek and south of 10 th Avenue between Wisconsin and Winnetka Avenues. He said the area currently has some Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission March 27, 2017 Page 5 Commercial and Light Industrial uses but it backs up to Bassett Creek so there may some opportunities for housing. Kluchka asked if there is any opportunity for redevelopment in this area. Zimmerman said he has heard that one business might possibly be leaving which could open it up to other opportunities including R-3 or R-4 residential or senior housing because it is close to the library, government center and downtown. Waldhauser asked if single level twin homes would be allowed in R-3. Zimmerman said it is tough to find land for that type of development. Waldhauser questioned if the City could limit the type of housing that is built without disadvantaging the current land owner. Goellner stated that townhomes and duplexes are permitted in the R-3 Zoning District. Segelbaum stated that given its proximity to downtown, he would be in favor changing the land use to Medium or High Density Residential. Blenker asked if it is considered “down zoning” to rezone a property from Industrial to Residential. Zimmerman said there would need to be thorough discussions with the City Attorney before rezoning any properties. Kluchka asked Zimmerman if he is including the McKesson parking lot. Zimmerman said he considered it but it is a small lot that might be difficult to build on. Zimmerman referred to the Park Nicollet/Wells Fargo parcels. He said if those properties were to turn over it seems a mix of commercial/retail/residential might work. Waldhauser said it would be nice to use the flexible category for these properties especially if the north side of the property were residential. Johnson said he lives in this area and hears comments about the sensitivity of building things where there hasn’t been anything built before and the loss of sun and openness. He said people drive really fast on Golden Valley Road and he would be more in favor of commercial or office so it doesn’t become a tunnel with tall buildings and end up exacerbating the traffic issues. Zimmerman stated that there have been studies done that show as buildings are pushed closer to the street people feel more confined and tend to slow down. Segelbaum asked if staff has a recommendation about the use of these parcels. Zimmerman said staff doesn’t have a recommendation, but feels that commercial or commercial with residential would be reasonable. Waldhauser said in terms of residential she would not want to see a high rise building, but she would like to see something lower, more in scale with the buildings that are already there. Kluchka said he is interested in seeing these parcels and the Golden Valley Shopping Center classified as flexible use to encourage commercial and industrial combinations. He said the value of having Park Nicollet and Wells Fargo is significant but some interesting developments could be done with a high rise/commercial/residential opportunity that steps down as it gets closer to Golden Valley Road would be appealing and appropriate. Segelbaum said he would like the Golden Valley Shopping Center to remain Commercial. Waldhauser stated that the west end of the shopping center seems like it could allow more flexible uses. Kluchka asked if there is an opportunity with the flexible land use designation to force a design review process. Zimmerman said yes, a site plan review could be required. Blenker asked what can be influenced in a site plan review. Zimmerman explained that Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission March 27, 2017 Page 6 certain qualitative standards have to be met if a site plan review is required. Waldhauser added that specific development guidelines would also have to be met. Johnson agreed that there needs to be some controls in the flexible use category. Zimmerman referred to the Post Office property and noted that the whole block is Commercial. He asked the Commissioners if they would like to keep it designated for Commercial uses. Waldhauser asked if that property is big enough for a senior residence. Zimmerman said it would be big enough. Kluchka said he could see commercial/office use on this site. Zimmerman next referred to the area near Basset Creek along Boone Avenue, south of 10th Avenue. Segelbaum asked if the properties in that area are Light Industrial. Zimmerman said the properties on the east side of Boone Avenue are Light Industrial and the properties on the west side of Boone Avenue are Industrial. Kluchka asked about development opportunities in this area. Zimmerman said it is hard to say because the Light Industrial property on 7 th Avenue has been very active and has obtained several Conditional Use Permits for various uses. Segelbaum asked about staff’s recommendations for this area. Zimmerman said he thinks the uses allowed in the Light Industrial and Industrial Zoning Districts could be reconsidered. Kluchka said this doesn’t seem like the right area to focus on and he would like to discuss it again in the future after he sees what the rest of the area looks like. Segelbaum agreed this area doesn’t seem to be a primary priority, but he would be open to allowing Commercial uses if it doesn’t disrupt other uses. Waldhauser said she thinks the City should encourage retail in this area. Segelbaum opened the meeting to public comments. Steve Mattix, 1604 St. Croix Circle, said everything he has heard sounds good but right now everything in the Downtown West area is facing Highway 55 and the backsides facing Golden Valley Road should be addressed as well. He said the last consideration should be traffic on Golden Valley Road because if you need to get through Golden Valley there is a freeway. He said one thing he thinks is missing are things made for pedestrians and people don’t speed down Main Street in Wayzata because there are people walking around and there are stores right up against the roads. Segelbaum asked Mattix if he is suggesting certain types of uses along either side of Golden Valley. Mattix said that right now the backside of the commercial building looks like the backside of a building so he wonders if something can be done to make it look like the building faces both Golden Valley Road and Highway 55. Seeing and hearing no one else wising the comment, Segelbaum closed the public comment period. Zimmerman said the other area he would like discuss is the proposed Golden Valley Road Light Rail Station Area. He explained that he doesn’t want to get too far into the planning process in this area due to the unknowns regarding funding of the Light Rail project. As the City learns more staff will go into more detail and possibly work with a TOD land use expert. He referred to a map of the area and noted the two station locations. He discussed the boundaries of the area and the locations within the area that seem to be the most likely to be impacted. He explained that the majority of this area is Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission March 27, 2017 Page 7 single family homes and staff has heard from several residents that they don’t want any change beyond the light rail stations. However, the Metropolitan Council is requiring the City to plan for more intense development in the future. He stated that other than buying individual parcels, the only real opportunity is the St. Margaret Mary Church property. He stated that the City has had conversations with the church and they do not have plans to leave and the City does not want to push them out, but the City has to consider long term plans and this is the most obvious land use change to consider in this area since it is right across the street from the proposed Golden Valley Road station. He added that there may be opportunities to add some higher density residential along the main roads such as Golden Valley Road or Zenith Avenue, or in the south end of the proposed district near the Plymouth Avenue/Theodore Wirth Park station. He added that there may also be some opportunity for development of residential properties or possibly a trail head for Sochacki Park on the Fire Station #3 property depending on the results of the City’s current Fire Station Study. Kluchka said he thinks the boundaries of the area are correct as shown. Waldhauser questioned if the area to the northeast of St. Margaret Mary Church should be included because that is an established residential neighborhood. Zimmerman said it is within a 10 minute walking distance of the Golden Valley Road Station. Segelbaum said it comes down somewhat to short term versus long term planning and he doesn’t have a strong opinion about change happening soon in this area. Waldhauser questioned if property owners on either side of Golden Valley Road would have different opportunities if their properties were rezoned because it might make values go up. Kluchka suggested removing the area north of Wirth Parkway. The Commission agreed. Blenker asked about the Metropolitan Council requirements for this area. Zimmerman stated that they want the City to plan for development potential that would support a light rail station. Blenker said this is a low density area made up mostly of single family homes but when she thinks of the number of people that are going to be added to the region it is a failure of imagination to think these areas can’t support the density. She said she thinks the land values will go up as soon as it becomes more secure that the light rail will come. She questioned if the City could do a timetable and change the zoning at a certain date so people can plan for change instead of waiting for change to happen which can seem more scary. Zimmerman agreed and said that a plan will be figured out in order to give people some more assurance. Segelbaum opened the meeting to public comments. Kevin Johnson, 1810 Zephyr Place, said he is wondering what will happen with funding. He said he wonders about the valuation of the properties because if he decides to sell his home there are things he’ll have to disclose about zoning, etc. He said he is concerned about emergency services if development does occur because there is limited access. He added that he is also concerned about oil trains using the tracks. Seeing and hearing no one else wishing to comment, Segelbaum closed the public comment period. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission March 27, 2017 Page 8 Zimmerman explained that state statutes require that once a Comprehensive Plan is adopted and land use changes have been made, the zoning has to be made consistent with the Comp Plan within nine months. He referred to the City’s Zoning Map and discussed various parcels throughout the City where there are conflicts or discrepancies. He said he is looking for feedback on whether to change either the zoning or the land use designation on these parcels. The first parcel discussed was the General Mills property north of Highway 55. He noted that the north half of the property is zoned Industrial but it is used as a nature area. He said he questions if it should be reflected that way in the zoning and that he would work with the Finance Department to discuss any impacts that may have. Waldhauser asked if General Mills owns the nature area property and if they would be involved in discussions regarding the property because she assumes it is valuable land if they ever want to develop it. Zimmerman said yes, General Mills owns the property but he doesn’t know what kind, if any, legal protections are on the land regarding development but he wants it to be clear on the land use map. Zimmerman referred to the nature area south of Highway 55 also owned by General Mills and said it is designated as open space on the land use map but is zoned Business and Professional Offices. The next area discussed was the General Mills campus south of Highway 55 which is designated Office but it is zoned Industrial. He said that property should probably be rezoned to Business and Professional Offices since there aren’t Industrial uses occurring. Zimmerman referred to the Tennant properties north of Highway 55 east of Highway 100 and stated that there are several parcels that are zoned differently, however the entire quadrant is guided Industrial on the land use map. Zimmerman stated that Tennant’s plan was to expand their corporate headquarters on these properties in the future, but according to recent conversations with Tennant they may be looking elsewhere, so the south half of this quadrant may be opened up to other developments. Kluchka said he thinks office would be a good designation for this property. Waldhauser said she thinks it would also work for Industrial uses. Zimmerman next referred to an area south of Breck school where Ottawa Avenue joins Glenwood Avenue and stated that Breck is working on a master plan for their campus and have purchased two of the existing residential properties. Breck has said they are interested in trying to acquire other properties which might help re-align the intersection to get the traffic to flow better. Zimmerman suggested reguiding some of these properties toward an Institutional use if they are incorporated into their campus. Zimmerman said lastly, there is a property on the corner of Golden Valley Road and Lilac Drive (former Montessori school) where there is an inconsistency between the land use and the zoning. The property is guided for Low Density Residential and is zoned Commercial so he would like the Commission’s feedback on what use they think would work on this property. Segelbaum asked if there have been any inquiries about this property. Zimmerman said there have been a few low impact commercial uses suggested. Waldhauser said this property seems like it should be residential or it would be nice to put a park on it. Kluchka said it would be a great site for a yoga studio. Waldhauser noted that it was a hair salon for many years so maybe if the City had a smaller scale commercial district that might work, or a small townhome development Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission March 27, 2017 Page 9 might work in this location as well. Blenker said it looks like a single family property to her. Zimmerman said it probably was originally. Zimmerman referred to the land use categories and the zoning district categories and explained that he is suggesting they be amended because they do not align with each other and it will resolve some of the current land use/zoning conflicts. The current residential land use categories are: Low Density (up to 5 units/acre), Medium-Low Density (5 to 12 units/acre), Medium-High Density (12 to 20 units/acre), and High Density (over 20 units/acre). Staff is proposing the land use categories be amended as follows: Low Intensity (up to 5 units/acre), Moderate Intensity (5 to 8 units/acre), Medium Intensity (8 to 20 units/acre), and High Intensity (over 20 units/acre) Zimmerman explained that the current residential zoning districts are as follows: R-1 Single Family (up to 5 units/acre), R-2 Moderate Density (up to 8 units/acre), R-3 Medium Density (up to 10 units/acre; 12 with bonus), R-4 High Density (over 12 units/acre). Staff is proposing the zoning districts be amended as follows: R-1 Single Family (up to 5 units/acre), R-2 Moderate Density (up to 8 units/acre), R-3 Medium Density (up to 20 units/acre), and R-4 High Density (over 20 units/acre) Segelbaum referred to the properties on Harold Avenue (east of the church) that are currently zoned R-2 and asked if there has been any discussion about changing those back to R-1. Zimmerman said no and explained that those properties have been guided for low density which allows up to 5 units per acre, but they have been zoned R-2 which allows up to 8 units per acre. He thinks the best solution would be to re-guide the land use to Moderate Intensity which allows up to 8 units per acre and would be consistent with the R-2 Zoning District. Segelbaum said he thinks the public has been accepting that there may be some increase in density from what is there now, but thus far nothing has worked so he doesn’t know if these properties will ever become more dense. Zimmerman said the City will probably see some lot splits on these properties which will create smaller, narrower lots with the homes placed toward the front of the lots and keeping the buffer from Highway 55 in the back. Zimmerman stated that the next step will be a Comp Plan Conversation about housing on April 12 and staff will bring a proposed future land use map back to the Planning Commission on April 24. --Short Recess-- 3. Reports on Meetings of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority, City Council, Board of Zoning Appeals and other Meetings Segelbaum reported on the last City Council meeting where they approved adding a youth member to the boards and commissions. Zimmerman added that the City Council liked the mentorship idea that the Planning Commission discussed. Johnson asked about the committee regarding public art for Central Park West. Goellner stated that they are waiting to get an anchor tenant before the committee moves forward. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission March 27, 2017 Page 10 4. Other Business •Council Liaison Report No report was given. 5. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 9:12 pm. __________________________________________________________ John Kluchka, Secretary Lisa Wittman, Administrative Assistant Golden Valley Human Services Fund (GVHSF) Meeting Minutes March 13, 2017 Present:Denise La Mere-Anderson, Kathryn Frommer, Peder Hanson, Elissa Heilicher, Andrea Mac Arthur, Scott Charlesworth-Seiler, Joanie Clausen and Brian Erickson, Staff Liaison. Not Attending:Aaron Black, Hilmer Erickson, Alan Ingber, Sarah Meyerring, Toots Vodovoz Call to Order: La Mere-Anderson called the meeting to order at 6:48 p.m. Agenda Changes or Additions:None February 8 Minutes:Charles-Seiler moved and Hanson seconded the motion to approve the minutes from February 14. The motion passed unanimously Run the Valley: Runner Update:Erickson reported that there are 73 registered for the 5K Run, 76 registered for the 10K Run, and 26 registered for the 5K Walk. This is slightly more than last year at this time. Sponsor Update:Sponsor list was reviewed and it was noted that we are close to the 5K fundraising goal. Discussion on contacting businesses that have not committed. Volunteers: Erickson passed out the volunteer sheet. Members reviewed or added themselves to the sheet. Erickson noted that more volunteers are needed and he would reach out to schools. La Mere-Anderson suggested reaching out to funded agencies to ask them to volunteer. A letter will be drafted and sent. Marketing/Publicity: Information will be or has been sent to the SunPost, Channel 12, Golden Valley City newsletter and the Park and Recreation brochure. Other Business: Bylaws Review:Bylaws were reviewed and were agreed to be acceptable. Non 501c3 Agency Funding:Mac Arthur had questions about the funding for non 510c3 organizations. Erickson stated that he would gather information to answer her question. Adjournment:Mac Arthur moved to adjourn the meeting, Hanson seconded the motion. The meeting was adjourned at 7:55 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Denise La Mere-Anderson, GVHSF Chair Brian Erickson, Staff Liaison GOLDENVALLEYOPEN SPACE& RECREATIONCOMMISSION Meeting Minutes February27,2017 1.Call to Order Rosenquist called the meeting to order at 6:30 pm. 2. Roll Call Present:Commissioners: Roger Bergman, Andy Bukowski, Cindy Carow-Schiebe, Gillian Rosenquist, and Dawn Speltz. Staff: Rick Birno, Director of Parks and Recreation. Absent:John Cornelius, Kelly Kuebelbeck, Bob Mattison, and Kimberly Sanberg. 3. Agenda ChangesorAdditions None. 4.Approval ofMinutes–January 23, 2017 MOTION:Moved by Bergman and seconded by Bukowski to approve the January 23, 2017 meeting minutes. Motion carried unanimously. 5. Resolution To Approve RecognizedGoldenValleyYouth Athletic Associations MOTION:Moved by Bergman and seconded by Carow-Schiebeto recognize Youth Athletic Associations listed on theagenda. Motion carried unanimously. 6. OSRCBylawsUpdate – TeenCommissionMember Birno said the Council has committed to the addition of a youth member to serve on city commissions. The youth must be in grades 9-12 and liveor attend school in Golden Valley and will serve as a voting Commissioner on most ofthe city commissions. The OSRC will then be made up of nine adult members and one youth member. MOTION:Moved by Bukowski and seconded by Bergman to change the OSRC by-laws to add a voting youth Commissionmember. Motion carriedunanimously. 7. MetroBlue Line Update Rosenquist said there is no update and the next meeting is March 6. 8. GoldenValleyBicycle and Pedestrian PlanningTask Force Update No update. 9. Comprehensive Planning Review (PerpichCenter forArtsandSandburg Athletic Facility) The OSRC reviewed the additions and changes they made to the previous recreation areas and community parks for what will be the 2018-2028 Comprehensive Park Plan. 10. CommissionandStaffUpdates Schaper Park – Birno saidthe city is working with Three Rivers to add a Challenge Course and an all- inclusive play structure at Schaper Park. They are working on a number of potential grants for this project. Improvements will also include a new water station and sun shelter. BrookviewConstruction – Birno said the construction is moving along well. He said the structural steel work is complete and 60% of the roof is complete. Next steps will be to seal off the building and make it watertight. The project is about three to four weeks behind schedule. Open Space & Recreation Commission Minutes February 27, 2017 Page 2 Master’sCupCrossCountrySkiRace atWirth – Birno received communication that the event will not include Sweeney or Twin Lakes as part of the race course. OSRC AnnualReport – Birno said the annual report will presented to the Council on May 9. Comprehensive PlanOpen House – Birno said thepublic open house to discuss the parks section of the Comprehensive Plan will be held on August 7 at City Hall, with Council/Manager review on August 8. 11. Adjournment MOTION:Moved by Bergman and seconded by Speltz to adjourn at 8 pm. Motion carried unanimously. ATTEST:John Cornelius, Chair Sheila Van Sloun, Administrative Assistant Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting April 20, 2017 Agenda Item 3. E. Approval of Amendments to Employee Handbook Prepared By Tim Cruikshank, City Manager Summary The Employee Handbook needs to be updated due to changes in State Law, City practices and proposed changes for more efficient operations. The proposed amendments to the Employee Handbook. Attachments •Draft Employee Handbook pages (3 pages) •Resolution Adopting Amendments to Employee Handbook (1 page) Recommended Action Motion to adopt Resolution Adopting Amendments to Employee Handbook. Lunch & Rest Breaks Section 6.10 Effective 1/1/2006; Updated 4/20/2017 Nursing Mothers For one year after a child's birth, nursing mothers will be provided reasonable unpaid break time to express milk.The City will provide a room (other than a bathroom)where the nursing mother can express milk in private.The room will be as close as possible to the employee's work area, include access to an electrical outlet, and be shielded from view and free from intrusion by other people. Sick Leave Section 7.10 Effective 1/1/2006; Revised 1/1/2010, 7/16/2013,4/20/2017 Permitted Uses of Sick Leave Sick leave may be approved only for days when an employee would otherwise have been at his or her employment. It may be used,with the approval of the supervisor, in any of the following cases: • when the employee cannot work because of the illness, injury, or disability of themselves,their children, spouse, parents, stepchildren, stepparents, siblings, or grandparents • for medical, dental,chiropractic,or optical examinations or treat-ment of the employee or employee's children (appointments should be scheduled to minimize the amount of disruption to the workday) • when the employee's presence would jeopardize the health of other employees by exposing them to contagious disease • during the period of incapacity when an employee is on Family and Medical Leave for his/her own illness or injury or the serious health condition of eligible family members • when an employee is receiving or providing assistance because he/she or a relative, which includes employee's adult child, spouse, sibling, parent, mother-in-law, father-in-law,grandchild,grandparent, or stepparent, is a victim of sexual assault, domestic abuse, or stalking. Safety leave for listed relatives, other than the employee and the employee's child, is limited to 160 hours in any 12-month period. • when an employee is subpoenaed or requested by the prosecuting attorney to attend court or criminal proceedings related to the victim's case because he/she is the victim or witness or is the spouse or immediate family member of such victim. Immediate family member includes parent, spouse,child, or sibling of the employee. • in the event of a death in the family. Up to five days of sick leave may be used for the death of a spouse or child (including stepchildren), up to three days for a death in the immediate family, and up to one day for the death of any person in the next degree of kindred (see Section 7.25 for more information on funeral leave). Family Medical Leave Section 7.40 Effective 1/1/2006; Updated 1/28/2008, 1/1/2009,4/20/2017 Length of Leave The length of FMLA leave is not to exceed 12 weeks in any rolling 12-month period.The entitlement to FMLA leave for the birth or placement of a child expires 12 months after the birth or placement of the child. If an employee takes FMLA leave for a reason unrelated to pregnancy,the employee is still entitled to 12 weeks of leave for pregnancy-related illness and parental leave under Minnesota Pregnancy and Parental Leave (see Parental Leave, Section 7.45). Compensatory Time Section 8.25 Effective 1/1/2006; Updated 4/20/2017 Compensatory(comp)time is paid time off which is earned and accrued by an employee in lieu of immediate cash payment for statutory overtime hours. As a condition for use of compensatory time in lieu of overtime payment in cash, the City has established the following guidelines for accrual and use of comp time: • Non-exempt employees may accrue a maximum of 40-60hours during the comp time fiscal year that begins after the last full pay period in October. Hours not used by the end of the last October pay period will be paid out. • Minimum overtime hours earned to be used for compensatory hours is one hour. Minimum compensatory hours to be used for time off is one hour. • At the end of the fiscal year, any unused balance of comp hours will be paid out. • Any compensatory time or overtime must be approved in advance by the supervisor or department head. • Exempt employees are not eligible for overtime payment. See Section 8.30 for information on exempt employees. Car Allowance Section 8.30 Effective 1/1/2006; Updated 4/20/2017 The City Council has approved a car allowance for the following positions within the City of Golden Valley if appointed on or before May 31, 2014, unless specified in a separate employment agreement: • City Manager Ilirer+er of o,-hl*c-WnrLr, • Dem nireetAr Af o;;rLi; ;iR Derrpatep . Direr-ter of Planning and Development • City Engineer • Public Works Maintenance Manager The City Council has approved a take-home vehicle for the following positions within the City of Golden Valley if appointed on or before May 31, 2014, unless specified in a separate employment agreement: • Fire Chief Alternate Duty Section 11.20 Effective 2/1/2006 Regular employees may request reasonable accommodations with the following for health conditions related to Pregnancy and childbirth: • more frequent restroom,food, and water breaks • seating • limits on lifting over 20 pounds • temporary transfer to a less strenuous or hazardous position, should one be available Parental Leave Section 7.45 Effective 1/1/2006; Revised 4/20/2017 Employees are provided with up to six-12 weeks of unpaid parental leave upon the birth or adoption of a child. Eligible Employees Eligible employees are those who have been employed by the City of Golden Valley for at least one year and work an average of 20 hours or more per week. Female employees for prenatal care or incapacity due to pregnancy, childbirth, or related health conditions, as well as a biological or adoptive parents in conjunction with or after the birth or adoption of a child, are eligible for up to 12 weeks of unpaid leave, consecutively or intermittently. For adoptive parents, the leave must be for the purpose of arranging the child's placement or caring for the child after placement.The leave must begin before or at the time of the child's placement in the adoptive home. Notice The employee must give the City at least 30 14-days advance notice of when the leave is to begin and the estimated amount of leaveif the leave is f^r^s^^a"le. If leave must be taken in less than three days,the employee should give as much notice as is practicable. Start of Leave The leave begins at the time requested by the employee and may net begin mere thanmust begin within 12 months of the birth or adoption. In cases where the child must remain in the hospital longer than the mother,the leave must begin within 12 months after the child leaves the hospital. weeks after the biFth eF adepti^^ '^+ho GaSe VOIRoro the eh,la arnw=cc�c�-arccrcrr��rrmvr-oav�crvrr.-�i i c i r c GaSP_ v v i i c i c the i c c i� a mu-st remain OR the hespital lengeF than the metheF,the leave Fnay Ret beg4R Fnerp- than cow yoppl4r ;;ftpr thp rzhold Ipavpr, the hospital. Length of Leave The length of the leave is determined by the employee but may not exceed 4X-12 weeks. Use of Annual Leave &Sick Bank Hours Employees may choose te _,se are-reir-w-Pedd S061(leave,vaeatien leave, and/eF paid time E)4(PT-Q) 400hile A-In Parenting Leave, but they aFe not Fequired to de so-. Employees are required to use all paid accrued leaves (ie, PTO,vacation, sick, etc) before being on unpaid status during this leave,the same as with the federal Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA). This leave runs concurrently with FMLA. However, if an employee takes FMLA leave for a reason unrelated to pregnancy, the employee is still entitled to 12 weeks of leave for pregnancy-related illness and parental leave under Minnesota Pregnancy and Parental Leave:rhe u-se of-arCerued le-ave A-GGuFs simultaneously with PaFenting Leave and Pamily Medie-al Leave Act (PMLA) leave and dees not extend the length of the PaFeRtiRg OF FMLA leaves (see Section 7.40 for further information on FMLA). Insurance Continuation Empleyees en Pare-Intal I-eave may ehee-se to e-A-14inue existing hea th eare benefits (health and dental) and life insuFanee at theiF awn expeRse, HR!e-,;-,;the leave also qualifies as PMLA leave, invihich e.ase the PF9ViSiE)RS ef the PMLA policy will apply.Group insurance coverages will remain available while the employee is on leave, but the employee is responsible for the entire premium except for any portion of the leave that is also FMLA qualifying. During the portion of leave that is FMLA qualifying,the employee will receive the same City contribution toward group benefits as prior to the leave commencing. Return to Work .The employee is entitled to return to work in the same position and same pay rate they were receiving prior to the start of the leave. Resolution 17-19 April 20, 2017 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION ADOPTING AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYEE HANDBOOK WHEREAS, a completely revised Employee Handbook was adopted by Resolution 11-81 on December 20, 2011 and dated January 1, 2012; amended by Resolution 12-24 on March 20, 2012; amended by Resolution 12-100 on December 18, 2012; and amended by Resolution 13-65 on July 16, 2013; and WHEREAS, the Employee Handbook amendments are required due to State Law, City practices and proposed changes for more efficient operation; and WHEREAS, various sections will be amended due to changes enacted regarding the Women’s Economic Security Act (WESA); and WHEREAS, amendments are needed in Section 8.25 Compensatory Time, and Section 8.30 Car Allowance; and WHEREAS, the above-referenced amendments will become effective as of April 21, 2017. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Golden Valley that the amendments to the “City of Golden Valley Employee Handbook” dated January 1, 2013, which outlines the City policies and procedures related to employment is hereby adopted, and supersedes all previously adopted policies and procedures except those contained in approved union contracts. _____________________________ Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: _____________________________ Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by the City Clerk. Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting April 20, 2017 Agenda Item 3. F. Authorize Upgrades to Traffic Signals Prepared By Jeff Oliver, PE City Engineer Summary When the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) constructs traffic signals at ramps and intersections of highways as part of highway improvement projects, it is standard procedure to enter into maintenance and operation agreements with cities for these signals. MnDOT assumes responsibility for signal operations and major maintenance while cities are responsible for relamping and electrical costs. The agreements for two existing traffic signals adjacent to Trunk Highway 169 have expired, or will soon expire, due to the scheduled expiration of the Traffic Signal Agreements transferring operations and major maintenance to the City of Golden Valley The traffic signal at Mendelssohn Avenue North and Plymouth Avenue North was installed when TH 169 was transferred from Hennepin County to MnDOT. The signal agreement entered into by the City and MnDOT expired on June 30, 2016, and the City became responsible for maintenance. The second signal located at General Mills Boulevard and Betty Crocker Drive was installed when Interstate 394 was constructed in the late 1980’s. The signal agreement entered into by the City and MnDOT will expire on June 30, 2017, and the traffic signal will become the City’s responsibility. The City of Golden Valley has utilized the Hennepin County Transportation Department (County) to maintain its traffic signals for many years. In order for the County to begin maintaining the two subject signals, the signal controller and software needs to be upgraded to be consistent with County signal standards. Staff solicited quotes from two contractors for the specified upgrades and the results are as follows: Granite Ledge Electrical $20,431 Egan Companies $21,948 Financing for these upgrades will be from the Traffic Signals budget (1425.6320 and 1425.6382). Attachments •Granite Ledge Electrical Contractors, Inc. (1 page) •Egan Company (1 Page) Recommended Action Motion to authorize contracting with Granite Ledge Electrical Contractors, Incorporated to upgrade traffic signals at Betty Crocker Drive and General Mills Boulevard; and at Mendelssohn Avenue North and Plymouth Avenue North in an amount not to exceed $20,431. "' Granit Ledge Electrical ® tractors Inc. 3Z0—Z945S57 QUOTE Project: Golden Valley Revise Signals Bid Date: March 14th 2017 Item No. Contract Item Unit Est.Qty Unit Price Total Revise Signal 1 General Mills @ Betty Crocker Drive EA 1 $7,191.00 $7,191.00 Revise Signal 2 Plymouth @ Mendelsshon EA 1 $13,240.00 $13,240.00 $0.00 $0.00 TOTAL BID PRICE $20,431.00 NAME Ron Brown DATE 4/14/2017 15436 130th Street, Foreston MN 56330 Office: 320-294-5557 Fax: 320-294-5997 ATTN: BIDDING DEPT. EGAN COMPANY ELECTRICAL DIVISION 7625 BOONE AVE N MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55428 Building on Promi " Kept ESTIMATOR Adam Johnson Cell 763-286-8721 3/31/2017 PROJECT: Golden Valley Signal Repair PROJECT NO: ITEM EST. UNIT BID NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY. PRICE AMOUNT 1 SIGNAL REPAIR(TWO INTERSECTIONS) LS 1 21948 21,948.00 GENERAL MILLS & BETTY CROCKER DRIVE PLYMOUTH & MENDELSSOHN TOTAL BID 21,948.00 SALES TAX, AND INSURANCE INCLUDED. BONDINCLUDED CONCRETE BASE REMOVAL NOT INCLUDED QUOTE BASED UPON AGC STANDARD SUB-CONTRACT AGREEMENT(Highway/Heavy). RETAINAGE AS PER PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. EROSION/TRAFFIC CONTROL BY GENERAL CONTRACTOR. ESTIMATE BASED ON STANDARD WORK WEEK M-F 7AM-3:30PM EXISTING UTILITIY LOCATES BY OTHERS ASBESTOS REMOVAL/DISPOSAL BY OTHERS IF ENCOUNTERED Egan-McKay 1 of 1 4/5/2017 Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting April 20, 2017 Agenda Item 3. G. Receipt of March 2017 Financial Reports Prepared By Sue Virnig, Finance Director Summary The monthly financial report provides a progress report of the following funds: ∼General Fund Operations ∼Conservation/Recycling Fund (Enterprise Fund) ∼Water and Sewer Utility Fund (Enterprise Fund) ∼Brookview Golf Course (Enterprise Fund) ∼Motor Vehicle Licensing (Enterprise Fund) ∼Storm Utility Fund (Enterprise Fund) ∼Equipment Replacement Fund (Capital Projects Fund) ∼Brookview Commons (Special Revenue Fund) General Fund Operations: As of March 2017, the City is using $1,560,491 of fund balance to balance the General Fund Budget. Attachments •March 2017 General Fund Financial Reports (2 pages) •March 2017 Conservation/Recycling Fund (1 page) •March 2017 Water and Sewer Utility Fund (1 page) •March 2017 Brookview Golf Course (1 page) •March 2017 Motor Vehicle Licensing (1 page) •March 2017 Storm Utility Fund (1 page) •March 2017 Equipment Replacement Fund (1 page) •March 2017 Brookview Commons Fund (1 page) Recommended Action Motion to receive and file the March 2017 Financial Reports. Over % 2017 March YTD (Under)Of Budget Budget Actual Actual Budget Expend. 001 Council $339,710 37,064 66,128 ($273,582) 19.47% 003 City Manager 816,815 48,996 152,960 (663,855) 18.73% 004 Transfers Out 850,000 0 0 (850,000)0.00% (1) 005 Admin. Services 1,869,145 145,917 353,755 (1,515,390) 18.93% 006 Legal 155,000 6,011 12,603 (142,397)8.13% (2) 007 Risk Management 305,000 0 0 (305,000)0.00% 011 General Gov't. Bldgs.583,635 50,110 105,282 (478,353) 18.04% 016 Planning 362,450 25,718 70,117 (292,333) 19.35% 018 Inspections 749,310 44,986 137,556 (611,754) 18.36% 022 Police 5,885,265 414,450 1,162,438 (4,722,827) 19.75% 023 Fire 1,336,825 99,321 290,289 (1,046,536) 21.71% 035 Physical Dev Admin 304,310 20,695 59,909 (244,401) 19.69% 036 Engineering 803,380 49,732 127,355 (676,025) 15.85% 037 Streets 1,609,730 94,713 288,262 (1,321,468) 17.91% 066 Park & Rec. Admin.719,970 54,973 153,426 (566,544) 21.31% 067 Park Maintenance 1,170,340 97,655 220,775 (949,565) 18.86% 068 Recreation Programs 418,845 18,195 58,701 (360,144) 14.01% TOTAL Expenditures $18,279,730 $1,208,536 $3,259,556 ($15,020,174)17.83% (1) This transfer will be made in June, 2017. (2) Legal services are billed thru February. City of Golden Valley Monthly Budget Report - General Fund Expenditures March, 2017 (unaudited) Division 25.00% Over % 2017 March YTD (Under)of Budget Type Budget Actual Actual Budget Received Ad Valorem Taxes $14,814,685 0 0 ($14,814,685)0.00% (1) Licenses 217,365 12,145 56,554 ($160,811)26.02% Permits 840,475 516,141 1,174,248 $333,773 139.71% State Aid 268,380 0 22,730 ($245,650)8.47% (2) Charges For Services: General Government 19,000 12,835 23,852 $4,852 125.54% Public Safety 154,175 24,573 41,994 ($112,181)27.24% Public Works 150,800 16,230 29,810 ($120,990)19.77% Park & Rec 385,350 20,278 59,744 ($325,606)15.50% Other Funds 791,500 56,115 166,578 ($624,922)21.05% Fines & Forfeitures 300,000 37,871 67,601 ($232,399)22.53% (3) Interest On Investments 75,000 0 0 ($75,000)0.00% (4) Miscellaneous Revenue 233,000 16,006 48,454 ($184,546)20.80% Transfers In 30,000 2,500 7,500 ($22,500)25.00% (5) TOTAL Revenue $18,279,730 $714,694 $1,699,065 ($16,580,665)9.29% Notes: (1) Payments are received in July, December, and January (delinquencies). (2) Police Training will be paid in August. Safe and Sober is billed on time spent. (3) Fines/Forfeitures are thru for February 2017. (4) Investment income is allocated at year end. (5)Transfers are monthly. Percentage Of Year Completed City of Golden Valley Monthly Budget Report - General Fund Revenues March 2017 (unaudited) Over 2017 March YTD (Under)% Budget Actual Actual Budget Current Revenue Hennepin County Recycling Grant 56,770 0 0 (56,770)0.00% Recycling Charges 373,950 29,442 63,431 (310,519)16.96%(2) Miscellaneous Revenues 6,000 0 0 (6,000) Interest on Investments 4,000 0 0 (4,000)0.00%(1) Total Revenue 440,720 29,442 63,431 (377,289)14.39% Expenses: Recycling 466,795 23,604 51,500 (415,295)11.03%(3) Total Expenses 466,795 23,604 51,500 (415,295)11.03% (1) Interest Earnings are allocated at year-end. (2) Includes billing thru March 2017. (3) Republic Services are billed thru February. City of Golden Valley Monthly Budget Report - Conservation/Recycling Enterprise Fund March 2017 (unaudited) Over 2017 March YTD (Under)% Budget Actual Actual Budget Current Revenue Water Charges 4,432,200 232,640 638,379 (3,793,821)14.40% Emergency Water Supply 183,600 11,749 32,266 (151,334)17.57% Sewer Charges 3,410,000 220,852 587,288 (2,822,712)17.22% Meter Sales 8,000 0 1,519 (6,481)18.99% Penalties 110,000 29,787 43,616 (66,384)39.65% Charges for Other Services 90,000 0 15,162 (74,838)16.85% State Water Testing Fee Pass Through 45,500 7,093 20,755 (24,745)45.62% Sale of Assets 10,000 0 29,858 19,858 298.58% Franchise Fees 400,000 0 0 (400,000)0.00% Certificate of Compliance 75,000 8,100 13,800 (61,200)18.40% Interest Earnings 15,000 0 0 (15,000)0.00% Total Revenue 8,779,300 510,221 1,382,643 (7,396,657)15.75% Expenses: Utility Administration 2,279,610 79,543 282,184 (1,997,426)12.38% Sewer Maintenance 2,809,045 205,533 773,367 (2,035,678)27.53% Water Maintenance 4,772,390 808,934 888,367 (3,884,023)18.61% Total Expenses 9,861,045 1,094,010 1,943,918 (7,917,127)19.71% City of Golden Valley Monthly Budget Report - Water and Sewer Utility Enterprise Fund March, 2017 (unaudited) Over 2017 March YTD (Under)% Budget Actual Actual Budget Current Revenue Green Fees 852,460 2,889 2,889 (849,571)0.34% Driving Range Fees 151,955 4,088 4,088 (147,867)2.69% Par 3 Fees 165,000 310 310 (164,690)0.19% Lawn Bowling 45,000 0 150 (44,850)0.33% Pro Shop Sales 90,000 774 1,328 (88,672)1.48% Pro Shop Rentals 285,000 732 1,837 (283,163)0.64% Concession Sales 415,000 10,331 23,008 (391,992)5.54% Other Revenue 80,150 19,308 29,649 (50,501)36.99% Interest Earnings 5,000 0 0 (5,000)0.00%(1) Less: Credit Card Charges/Sales Tax (46,000)(717)(717)45,283 1.56% Total Revenue 2,043,565 37,715 62,542 (1,981,023)3.06% Expenses: Golf Operations 715,020 44,848 79,542 (635,478)11.12%(2) Course Maintenance 1,010,280 51,771 81,194 (929,086)8.04% Pro Shop 125,220 32 16,616 (108,604)13.27% Grill 307,840 5,235 10,083 (297,757)3.28% Driving Range 59,695 26 26 (59,669)0.04% Par 3 Course 24,995 37 37 (24,958)0.15% Lawn Bowling 21,245 0 0 (21,245)0.00% Total Expenses 2,264,295 101,949 187,498 (2,076,797)8.28% (1) Interest Earnings are allocated at year-end. (2) Depreciation is allocated at year-end. City of Golden Valley Monthly Budget Report - Brookview Golf Course Enterprise Fund March, 2017 (unaudited) opened March 31 Over 2017 March YTD (Under)% Budget Actual Actual Budget Current Revenue Interest Earnings 2,000 0 0 (2,000)0.00%(1) Charges for Services 423,165 46,018 123,737 (299,428)29.24% Total Revenue 425,165 46,018 123,737 (301,428)29.10% Expenses: Motor Vehicle Licensing 424,720 31,156 87,269 (337,451)20.55% Total Expenses 424,720 31,156 87,269 (337,451)20.55% (1) Interest Earnings are allocated at year-end. City of Golden Valley Monthly Budget Report - Motor Vehicle Licensing Enterprise Fund March 2017 (unaudited) Over 2017 March YTD (Under)% Budget Actual Actual Budget Current Revenue Interest Earnings 50,000 0 0 (50,000)0.00%(1) Storm Sewer Charges 2,375,000 179,750 499,949 (1,875,051)21.05% Bassett Creek Watershed 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! Miscellaneous Receipts 207,775 17,800 17,800 (189,975) State Grant - Other 0 0 0 0 Total Revenue 2,632,775 197,550 517,749 (2,115,026)19.67% Expenses: Storm Utility 3,527,930 291,467 491,439 (3,036,491)13.93%(2) Street Cleaning 128,000 3,787 13,773 (114,227)10.76% Environmental Control 317,565 18,545 43,691 (273,874)13.76% Debt Service Payments 0 0 0 0 0.00%(3) Total Expenses 3,973,495 313,799 548,903 (3,424,592)13.81% (1) Interest Earnings are allocated at year-end. (2) Depreciation is allocated at year-end and. (3) Debt service payments will be reimbursed by TIF. City of Golden Valley Monthly Budget Report - Storm Utility Enterprise Fund March, 2017 (unaudited) 2017 Equipment Replacement Fund (CIP) - Fund 5700 2017 March YTD Budget Total Actual Remaining Revenues: Proceeds - Certificate of Indebtedness 800,000 0 0 (800,000) Sale of Assets 35,000 1,683 20,683 (14,317) Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 Interest Earnings (allocated at year end)28,831 0 0 (28,831) Total Revenues 863,831 1,683 20,683 (843,148) Expenditures: Program #Project Number Project Name 5700 Bond Expenditures 0 0 0 0 5701 V&E-001 Marked Squad Cars (Police)80,000 8,122 38,157 41,843 (1)5702 V&E-002 Computers and Printers (Finance)105,000 9,728 15,557 89,443 V&E-021 Vibratory Asphalt Roller (street)45,000 0 0 45,000 V&E-026 Pickup Truck (Park)40,000 0 0 40,000 5760 V&E-037 Aerial Ladder (Fire)400,000 11,078 53,816 346,184 V&E-038 Streetscape Banners (Street)25,000 0 0 25,000 V&E-070 Single Axle Dump Truck (Street)225,000 0 0 225,000 V&E-073 Sidewalk Snowblower (Street)110,000 0 0 110,000 V&E-083 Passenger Vehicle (Fire)40,000 0 0 40,000 V&E-099 Asphalt Hot Box (Street)45,000 0 0 45,000 V&E-108 Unmarked Police Vehicle (Police)40,000 0 0 40,000 V&E-120 Field Line Painter 20,000 13,561 13,561 6,439 V&E-121 Tasers (Police)16,000 0 0 16,000 V&E-126 Tack Sprayer (Street)60,000 0 0 60,000 V&E-128 Utility Tractor (Park)105,000 0 0 105,000 V&E-130 Rotary Mower (Park)25,000 0 0 25,000 V&E-135 Body Cameras/Dash Cams/Software (Police)220,000 0 0 220,000 V&E-150 Asset Management Software 60,000 0 0 60,000 Total Expenditures 1,661,000 42,489 121,091 1,259,909 (1) Computers are replaced every 4-5 years and purchased throughout the year based on available time. (2) In 2016, a transfer was made to the equipment replacement fund to purchase video dash cams and body cameras together. Over 2017 March YTD (Under)% Budget Actual Actual Budget Current Revenue Brookview CC Rentals 20,000 113 468 (19,532)2.34% Backyard Play Area 50,450 0 0 (50,450)0.00% Miscellaneous Revenues 25,500 0 0 (25,500)0.00% Interest on Investments 4,000 0 0 (4,000)0.00%(1) Total Revenue 99,950 113 468 (99,482)0.47% Expenses: General Area Rooms 167,715 1,893 5,428 (162,287)3.24%(2) Indoor Play Area 54,875 0 325 (54,550)0.59%(3) Banquet Facility 63,360 0 600 (62,760)0.95%(3) Total Expenses 285,950 1,893 6,353 (279,597)2.22% (1) Interest Earnings are allocated at year-end. (2) Staff Time/Supplies for Community Center Rental (3) Advertising costs for CVB brochure City of Golden Valley Monthly Budget Report - Brookview Commons Special Revenue Fund March 2017 (unaudited) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting April 20, 2017 Agenda Item 3. H. 2016 Positive Performance General Fund Transfer and Assignment of Fund Balance Prepared By Susan Virnig, Finance Director Summary The City of Golden Valley seeks to have a good balance in its General Fund in order to have sufficient reserves for cash flow purposes, projects, and unexpected shortfalls or emergencies. In December 2011, the City established a formal policy on the level of fund balance that should be maintained in the General Fund. The General Fund Balance Policy to assure adequate reserves indicates fiscal prudence and maintains a high rating with bond-rating agencies, which prefer to see very strong and healthy balances. When the fund balance is greater than 60 percent, it should be reduced to 60 percent by using the excess funds for specific one-time projects, acquisitions, or transfers to capital funds to lessen the future impact on the property tax rate or long-term debt reduction. The one-time use protocol is important to ensure the City does not commit itself to expenditures that may create deficits in future budgets. For instance, when the City experiences an excess fund balance due to a one-time building permit revenue from a major commercial development, the City should not expect that same revenue will be received from future building permits. Budgets should be set using an average year of revenues and expenditures and not an exceptional year. In 2016, Golden Valley was extremely fortunate once again to have a positive performance level. Because fund balance was over 60 percent of 2017 Expenditures by $1,000,000, staff recommends making the following transfers: Park Improvement Fund $300,000 Annual General Fund transfers to the Park Improvement Fund should be at least $400,000 to maintain our current park and open space system and outlined in the City’s Infrastructure Analysis Report. Currently the General Fund transfers $250,000. This one-time amount of $300,000 will help finance tennis court infrastructure improvements to the park and open space system. Storm Sewer Enterprise Fund $700,000 Capital Projects have increased due to level of needs with overall storm water ponds to prevent flooding throughout the city. This amount will help finance infrastructure improvements to the citywide storm water system and increase the amount available for potential matching grants. TOTAL TRANSFERS $1,000,000 Staff will work on articles for the city newsletter and various media to educate people about government finance and how positive performance works to their benefit. Attachments •December 2016 General Fund Financial Report (2 pages) •Resolution Authorizing the Transfer of $1,000,000 from the General Fund to the Park Improvement Fund for $300,000 and to the Storm Utility Fund for $700,000 (1 page) Recommended Action Motion to adopt Resolution Authorizing the Transfer of $1,000,000 from the General Fund to the Park Improvement Fund for $300,000 and to the Storm Utility Fund for $700,000. 100.00% Over % 2016 December YTD (Under)of Budget Type Budget Actual Actual Budget Received Ad Valorem Taxes $14,278,810 6,804,475 14,176,940 ($101,870)99.29%(1) Licenses 217,515 4,880 255,165 $37,650 117.31% Permits 1,126,375 49,274 1,604,043 $477,668 142.41% Federal Grants 0 5,247 18,359 $18,359 State Aid 268,380 133,587 282,426 $14,046 105.23%(2) Hennepin County Aid 0 698 4,133 $4,133 Charges For Services: General Government 19,000 3,389 36,042 $17,042 189.69% Public Safety 150,665 19,210 176,511 $25,846 117.15% Public Works 145,800 27,470 189,543 $43,743 130.00% Park & Rec 395,100 14,408 370,708 ($24,392)93.83% Other Funds 791,500 9,722 728,480 ($63,020)92.04% Fines & Forfeitures 320,425 56,742 283,483 ($36,942)88.47%(3) Interest On Investments 100,000 56,518 56,518 ($43,482)56.52%(4) Miscellaneous Revenue 233,000 22,862 214,751 ($18,249)92.17% Transfers In 30,000 2,500 30,000 $0 100.00%(5) TOTAL Revenue $18,076,570 $7,210,982 $18,427,102 $350,532 101.94% Notes: (1) Payments are received in July, December, and January (delinquencies). (2) Police Training was paid in August. Safe and Sober is billed on time spent.Last half of Local Govt Aid was made in Dec, (3) Fines/Forfeitures are thru December 2016. (4) Investment income is allocated at year end. (5)Transfers are monthly. Percentage Of Year Completed City of Golden Valley Monthly Budget Report - General Fund Revenues Decemberr 2016 (unaudited) Over % 2016 December YTD (Under)Of Budget Budget Actual Actual Budget Expend. 001 Council $322,960 26,523 322,399 ($561) 99.83% 003 City Manager 798,260 86,669 762,151 (36,109) 95.48% 004 Transfers Out 1,220,950 210,000 1,220,950 0 100.00% (1) 005 Admin. Services 1,869,995 199,180 1,812,545 (57,450) 96.93% 006 Legal 150,000 10,159 138,215 (11,785) 92.14% (2) 007 Risk Management 305,000 (110,890)154,842 (150,158) 50.77% 011 General Gov't. Bldgs.532,790 83,651 526,239 (6,551) 98.77% 016 Planning 353,800 38,638 326,394 (27,406) 92.25% 018 Inspections 777,690 94,912 735,454 (42,236) 94.57% 022 Police 5,671,180 623,719 5,256,969 (414,211) 92.70% 023 Fire 1,290,210 136,224 1,246,083 (44,127) 96.58% 035 Physical Dev Admin 298,755 35,791 290,376 (8,379) 97.20% 036 Engineering 783,470 90,479 688,515 (94,955) 87.88% 037 Streets 1,611,865 244,870 1,499,795 (112,070) 93.05% 065 Community Center 81,095 15,267 80,175 (920) 98.87% 066 Park & Rec. Admin.705,660 79,001 675,464 (30,196) 95.72% 067 Park Maintenance 1,137,895 128,454 1,122,111 (15,784) 98.61% 068 Recreation Programs 374,995 36,919 322,390 (52,605) 85.97% TOTAL Expenditures $18,286,570 $2,029,566 $17,181,067 ($1,105,503)93.95% (1) This transfer was made in June, 2016. Two amendments to the budget were also approved. (2) Legal services are billed thru December. City of Golden Valley Monthly Budget Report - General Fund Expenditures December, 2016 (unaudited) Division Resolution 17-20 April 20, 2017 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE TRANSFER OF $1,000,000 FROM THE GENERAL FUND TO THE PARK IMPROVEMENT FUND FOR $300,000 AND TO THE STORM WATER UTILITY FUND FOR $700,000. WHEREAS, the General Fund Reserves meets 60% of 2017 expenditures, and WHEREAS, the transfer of $300,000 to the Park Improvement Fund to help maintain the current park and open space systems, and WHEREAS, the transfer of $700,000 to the Storm Water Utility Fund would fund needs for infrastructure improvements, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Golden Valley to authorize the transfer of $1,000,000 from the General Fund to the Park Improvement Fund for $300,000, and to the Storm Water Utility Fund for $700,000. _____________________________ Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: _____________________________ Kristine A Luedke, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by the City Clerk. AGENDA Regular Meeting of the City Council Golden Valley City Hall 7800 Golden Valley Road Council Chamber May 2, 2017 6:30 pm 1.CALL TO ORDER PAGES A.Pledge of Allegiance B.Roll Call C.Presentation: Hennepin County Attorney Mike Freeman - “Crime Update” 2.ADDITIONS AND CORRECTIONS TO AGENDA 3.CONSENT AGENDA Approval of Consent Agenda - All items listed under this heading are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no discussion of these items unless a Council Member so requests in which event the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda. A.Approval of Minutes - City Council Meeting April 20, 2017 B.Approval of City Check Register C.Licenses: 1. Approve Temporary Liquor License - Golden Valley Pride Festival D.Minutes: 1. Human Rights Commission - March 28, 2017 E.Bids and Quotes F.Board/Commission Appointments G.Board/Commission Reappointments H.Proclamation for Arbor Day and Month - May 2017 4.PUBLIC HEARINGS A. 5.OLD BUSINESS 6.NEW BUSINESS A.Cooperative Agreement with Union Pacific Railroad - 10 th Avenue Culverts B.Announcement of Meetings 1. Future Draft Agendas: Council/Manager May 9, 2017, City Council May 16, 2017 and City Council June 6, 2017 C.Mayor and Council Communications 7.ADJOURNMENT A G E N D A Council/Manager Meeting Golden Valley City Hall 7800 Golden Valley Road Council Conference Room May 9, 2017 6:30 pm Pages 1. Comprehensive Plan Updates - Sustainability and Resilience (15 minutes) 2. Commission Annual Report: a. Open Space and Recreation Commission (20 minutes) b. Planning Commission (30 minutes) c. Board of Zoning and Appeals (20 minutes) d. Environmental Commission (20 minutes) 3. Human Rights Commission Guidance (15 minutes) 4. Discussion on Process for Refreshing City Promotional Items Council/Manager meetings have an informal, discussion-style format and are designed for the Council to obtain background information, consider policy alternatives, and provide general directions to staff. No formal actions are taken at these meetings. The public is invited to attend Council/Manager meetings and listen to the discussion; public participation is allowed by invitation of the City Council. AGENDA Regular Meeting of the City Council Golden Valley City Hall 7800 Golden Valley Road Council Chamber May 16, 2017 6:30 pm 1.CALL TO ORDER PAGES A.Pledge of Allegiance B.Roll Call 2.ADDITIONS AND CORRECTIONS TO AGENDA 3.CONSENT AGENDA Approval of Consent Agenda - All items listed under this heading are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no discussion of these items unless a Council Member so requests in which event the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda. A.Approval of Minutes - City Council Meeting May 2, 2017 B.Approval of City Check Register C.Licenses: 1. D.Minutes: 1. E.Bids and Quotes 1. Award Douglas Drive Landscaping Contract F. 4.PUBLIC HEARINGS A.Public Hearing - Zoning Code Text Amendment - Allow Mobile Food Vendors in Residential Zoning Districts (tentative) 5.OLD BUSINESS 6.NEW BUSINESS A.Adopt Wayzata Boulevard Bikeway Feasibility Report B.Announcement of Meetings 1. Future Draft Agendas: City Council June 6, 2017, Council Manager June 13, 2017, and City Council June 20, 2017 C.Mayor and Council Communications 7.ADJOURNMENT