The URL can be used to link to this page

06-26-17 PC Agenda AGENDA Planning Commission Regular Meeting Golden Valley City Hall, 7800 Golden Valley Road Council Chambers Monday, June 26, 2017 7:00 pm 1. Approval of Minutes May 8, 2017, Regular Planning Commission Meeting June 12, 2017, Special Planning Commission Meeting June 12, 2017, Regular Planning Commission Meeting 2. Informal Public Hearing — Conditional Use Permit— 8838 7t" Avenue South — Skylab Glass Arts — CU-157 Applicant: Skylab Glass Arts Address: 8838 7t" Avenue South Purpose: To allow for Accessory Retail Services in the Light Industrial zoning d istrict. 3. Discussion — Places of Assembly --Short Recess-- 4. Reports on Meetings of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority, City Council, Board of Zoning Appeals and other Meetings 5. Other Business • Council Liaison Report 5. Adjournment This document is available in alternate f�rmats upan a 72-hour request.Please call 7b3-593-8046(TTY:763-593-39b$)to make a request. Examples of alternate fprmats may include large print,�lectronic,Braille,audiocassette,etc. Special Meeting of the Golden Valley Planning Commission May 8, 2017 A special meeting of the Planning Commission was held at the Golden Valley City Hall, Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota, on Monday, May 8, 2017. Chair Segelbaum called the meeting to order at 6:30 pm. Those present were Planning Commissioners Baker, Blenker, Blum, Johnson, Kluchka, Segelbaum, and Waldhauser. Also present were Associate Planner/Gr�ct�t�l�f�iter Emily Goellner, Public Works Specialist Eric Eckman, GreenCorps Memb�r�annah ��arry, and Administrative Assistant Lisa Wittman. 1. 6-6:30 pm: Open House (Resilience and Sustaina�b�lity) , ��` ��'�� , .; � 2. 6:30-7:30 pm: Presentation and Discussion (Res�lien�+e and S;�tainabilitY) � Eckman stated that this Comp Plan discussion will fo��Qn tf� Resilience and Sustainability chapter. He explained that the te�i��ence��5�;t�e capacity to respond, adapt, and thrive under changing conditions�uch as w�ather ar�e� climate related events. The term sustainability aims to meet the nee�s of the pr��ent without compromising the � ability of future generations to meet th�ir��wn r��eds. Eckman discussed the impacts of s�v�ral Glimate trends and observations that the MnDNR Climatology Office has�served�`��ncluding: warming temperatures, higherwinter (low/cold) temperatures with more f►'eeze�#�aw cycles and more winter rain, the increase in annual precipitation, and m�reasit�g extrei�e rainfall events. Garry referred to the vt��r�r�bility ��sessment completed by Great Plains Institute and stated that the following areas w��re analyzed: natural infrastructure, built infrastructure, vulnerable popul��i�ns, ar�d economic vulnerability. She stated that the assessment $,j showed that_the City`has �;�ealthy urban tree canopy coverage of 40%, the planting to removal rati�i c3�.�ubli,c trees:�� 0.47 to 1 (the recommended ratio is 2:1), and 21.4% of public tre�� ar�,�sh �'t�;es��u"sceptible to Emerald Ash Borer, however the City has an Emerald A�h.Bo�r��,management plan in place. Garry�r�ferred �+�the�built infrastructure portion of the assessment and stated that the Pavem��;t Mar��ement Program (PMP) will ensure all roads meet City standards for 2022. She ��ted that the City has an aging underground infrastructure with 80% of the sanitary sewer lines, and 74% of the watermains being older than 50 years. Segelbaum asked if the underground infrastructure is replaced as part of the PMP. Eckman stated that all mains are evaluated and a portion of the watermains and sewer mains are replaced or rehabilitated with the project, based on priority and funding. Kluchka asked if data regarding the quality of the infrastructure could be added because just the age of the infrastructure isn't a good qualitative evaluator of how good or bad it is. Eckman said staff would try to aggregate that data and added that age is usually a good indicator of quality given the pipe material and the soils in Golden Valley. Waldhauser asked if there is data Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission May 8, 2017 Page 2 showing how much of the underground infrastructure sits on private property. Eckman said there is a significant amount, but that the assessment focused more on public property than private property. He added that homeowners have been repairing and replacing their private lines as well with PMP projects and I and I point of sale. Garry referred to the vulnerable populations portion of the assessment and stated that over 20% of the City's population is older than 65 and 33% of those residents over 65 live alone. 8.2% of the City's population lives below the poverty line, and 20.6% of the population are eligible to receive heating assistance. Garry referred to the economic vulnerability portion of the assessment�nd n��ed that Golden Valley has a higher median income relative to Hennepin Cat,�ty, there i�°a diverse workforce with a low unemployment rate, and 40% of th�,�old�� Valley�rrQrkforce are within the sectors hit hardest during the Great Recession�� '�� ., �, Garry referred to the energy section of the assessment ar��.st�t��# that GoL�len Valley residents and businesses get their electricity from Xcel Ene��y R��idents°r7nake up the largest customer sector with more than 8,000 customers, and�2% ��fi�� energy in the City is consumed by its industrial customers. . �: Garry discussed the community engagemen�°strategie�which include: the community survey done in the summer of 2016, the Corr�p Plan kick}€�ff open house done in September of 2016, the ongoing Comp �I��sttt'uey, the r�silience survey done in January and February of 2017, conv��satior��wi�t�`t�e��iusinesses done in March of 2017, and two focus groups in March.�,f 2Q�7, one with people supporting vulnerable populations, and one with the �J�vir�nrrte�al Commission. Segelbaum asked if any of these channels are still ope�t�for pu��t� co�ent. Garry said yes, the Comp Plan survey on the City's website will be �railabl��for th��uration of the Comp Plan update process. Garry discussed the t}i'�rn��emerging from community input as well as the vulnerability assessment. Th�se thernes ittclu�l,e: p'rotecting and increasing green spaces and the tree canopy, enhancmg�anrater q��ity, rni�igating impacts from flooding, investing in aging infrastructu{re, expar��ir�g tl�e sidewalk and trail system, exploring options for solid waste managemer�t��d �ar��nraste�F.management, expanding the recycling program to include composti�g/org�nics; `rr��sing energy efficiency and renewable energy use, attracting and supporti�g srra�ll businesses, improving social connectedness and diversity, and en}��uraging �ustai��le practices and by informing and engaging the public. Eckmar�d�scussed each of the proposed goals and objectives. The first goal is to promote and develop 'clean, renewable energy. The second goal is to encourage energy efficiency in buildings, lighting, and infrastructure. The third goal is to encourage waste reduction, recycling, and composting. The fourth goal is to protect and enhance the natural environment. The fifth goal is to plan for resilient and sustainable infrastructure. The sixth goal is to increase community resilience and preparedness. He stated that he is looking for general consensus on the themes and priorities and feedback on the preliminary goals, objectives, and policies. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission May 8, 2017 Page 3 Kluchka asked where water use and/or reduction and efficiency fits into this. Eckman stated that water use and conservation could be part of goal four regarding protecting and enhancing the natural environment. He added that the Met Council has combined waste water, potable water, and surface water into one chapter titled water resources as a more integrated approach. Kluchka suggested elevating water conservation to the first goal by stating that the goal is to promote and develop clean, renewable energy and resources. He added that he wants to consider water as utility in the same context as renewable energy. Eckman suggested adding language regarding water to goal five and think about it as a part of the City's infrastructure. Segelbaum asked if the Climatology Office takes future rain events int�account. Eckman stated that the City uses NOAA data which has the most up to date��'�cipitatio�s�nodels for this region. �_ � �� " � ��T� � y Kluchka asked if goal five regarding resilient and sustainabl��nfrast�u�ture�"��es community solar. Eckman said yes, that is distributive pow�.r t�r�t��eds the grid. Kluchka asked if the City is proactive in burying power lines or requiring c�uits��h future capacity during PMP projects. Eckman said yes, th�rexare a��w eXa�es of this, and added that the City also encourages the utility cor�par�f��o u� the right-of-way wisely. Kluchka asked if it is fair to say the City is pria`�'i�i�tg�a�ger�ur�t��rgrounding projects and not residential projects. Eckman said there a�e some ic�eas for residential properties woven into the policies, and that staff is still f��mulating �rategies, but generally new power lines and other facilities are rec�ire�l�o b�e�buried t��derground. Segelbaum asked if the Environmen��l Corr�mission has provided feedback. Eckman said they have seen other versions o�}#�� pr��ised goals and objectives, but they will be reviewing a more refined ve�sion so�i�. Gt��alner added that this chapter will be brought back to the Planning Commis�ion f��'more specific discussion in the fall. Segelbaum opened tt��urneeting ta public comments. ��_ Steve Pesavento, ��01 �#�1�;�rs A�n�ue North, said he is very interested in renewable energy and he wants�tk�e ��y to be very proactive and not restrictive when it comes to � solar, wind, g��€�h�r�a�, etc.;,�egelbaum asked how the City can encourage these types of things'� Pesa`v��nto`��d�`�e City shouldn't be as restrictive as it currently is and wind energy is r�o� being looked at as strongly as it could be. . ; . ; Marci��nders��, 130 Edgewood Avenue North, asked if the Comp Plan is supposed to be very�eneral`x�vith very broad goals because that is the way it reads. She said she thinks the nvi��in of goals is to be broad, and the proposed goals are great, but very unspecific. She agreed that the City should consider being much more proactive and questioned what the metrics and targets are because she hasn't heard anything specific. Segelbaum stated that the hierarchy starts with a goal, then gets more specific in the objectives then even more specific in the policies. Goellner agreed and stated the implementation language is specific about costs, targets, etc. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission May 8, 2017 Page 4 Marti Micks, 90 Louisiana Avenue South, said it takes longer to fix power outages when the lines are buried underground. She noted that there is nothing in the proposed language about enhancing the existing power grid. She suggested having a parade of homes type of event showing energy efficient homes and ideas and said another issue that should be addressed is not allowing the amount of impervious pavement to increase with new developments. Jeanne Francis, 8025 Plymouth Avenue North, said she is concerned about pesticides and herbicides. She questioned what Golden Valley can do as a community to be more aware and educated about these health hazards because it would be ��t�,to be a pesticide free community. �' _�� . � .�: Seeing and hearing no one else wishing to comment, Segelbaum+elos��the pukal�c comment period. � � �� ; °X �'' . Segelbaum referred to the comment regarding the City b��ng I��'�stricti�t� on renewable energy items. He said goal number one is to prornote�ae�.d de�lop clean, renewable energy and asked if there are other place�=in the �apte�uu��re renewable energy is addressed. Kluchka stated that the secQnd ok�je�tiv��=n goal�one discusses supporting renewable energy projects. Waldh�ser ��i� tlie ��iards to encourage renewable energy are in the proposed language and sirg�ested being more specific as it relates to private property. Baker stated that �5�dinance changes could be done in order to reduce barriers. ,� ��u Kluchka asked how the City ensures��cot.��ability and how the Met Council enforces the goals that the City is trying tosa�c�rmpli�� Goellner stated that the Met Council only requires cities to have a CQr�p Plan �iat r�e�ts their minimum requirements and doesn't push cities to meet their own g�als ��° Waldhauser said that mos��t�f the�ro�osed goals don't read like goals to her. She suggested not using th�word��c�u�ge and instead using action verbs such as promote, implem�ert,�and'i�rove. �he said she would like the goals to be more understandable ancf stron��r, and not so vague. Baker said the goals should be vague and mor� urr�b�'ekla ir� r��t�re:�,He stated that more specific language will be in the � implemer`afiatior� languag�,��uhich will lead to actionable items. Kluchka agreed that the goals shoulc# be �Qre actively phrased because they will have a more substantial impact an��having ov�rlapp��g policies and objectives isn't as helpful. Blum re��red tc�'fhe community feedback summary document that was in the agenda packet. He�na`ted that there were three different tools used that were intended to help the City solve the issue of how to prioritize the goals. He said he doesn't think the prioritization of the goals has been vetted, they've only been discussed in a preliminary fashion. He referred to the Comp Plan kick-off open house and said while he thinks that was a good idea and a good effort at community engagement, he questions some of things the City did to get a measurable prioritization such as the stickers residents put next to the goals. His recollection is that everybody who participated was given five stickers so if a goal got 20 stickers that would be a minimum of four people out of 20,000 Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission May 8, 2017 Page 5 who commented on a particular goal. He said the City fed people pre-generated answers as possible goals that they could support. He questioned how much weight should really be given to those results as much as it was a great effort and it generated a lot of conversation, he is not sure there was a measurable result that should be given a lot of weight or prioritization. He referred to the general themes that are emerging from the online Comp Plan survey and said he thinks those reference a very open ended survey without feeding people the answers. He said the survey asked people what they think is great about this community and what they wanted to promote. The biggest priority from that survey is "green" both aesthetically and scientifically. He said that was the highest priority and should be given more weight than the others. He said the suruey was insightful in showing what residents actually want to see the City do H�"sai��l�e theme of more trees and green in general didn't translate priority-wise to the g�als and a��ectives and he thinks that should be the number one goal because residents �re spontai�eously telling the City that is the most important thing to them out of�� bther pri�#�es. !•�e referred to the Great Plains assessment and said the City h��contr ed �� i�i'em to get J y �� . �� an ob�ective review of issues in the communit . He notice�#he s#,�'t��tic m the report that the City plants .5 trees for every one removed. He said it m��Ces �ar'e s��e to him to plant 2 or more trees for every one removed. He refe�'red to a�other St�fitstic in the report that states the City only plants 50 to 75 trees every ye�r. I�e s�id he realizes that it may not be feasible to plant a lot of trees on City prUp��y but he ft�in�s if people really want to "green" this community there could be a publs�-private partnership that would get subsidized trees to people. He said he know�there are c��ganizations that do that which would take away some of the adminis#�'��e diff��ulty and costs for the C.ity. He stated that he knows the Tree Trust does simi��'tivork �nd th€��they have planted approximately one tree a day for the past decade w�h�jch is �mpressive and Golden Valley isn't even close to that. He said he thinks this��i�are� #r�r improvement and will match the priorities of the residents and bring the �ifi�i fonn�"d in�ing up to the words "sustainability" and "resilience." � � , Baker referred to the eorr�rnunity f��dback document and asked if the themes listed there are in order of priority. ��elln�r`�id ri�, but that the goals could be listed in order of priority. Blum sai��he loo��tl�wor� ��r word at the survey responses and "green" either scientifically �r aest�i�tica�y was a high priority for residents. �: �� Kluchka��ked�how f�� oval of ash trees has affected the numbers listed in the vulnerabilify`ass��ment. Eckman said the tree replacement numbers in the assessment se�m a little fi��to�}��. He explained that during a pavement management project the City typically re�aces trees at a two to one ratio. He stated that trees are also removed to install pt��,ds o�'��store streambanks in order to benefit water quality or for property protection�R1so, Cottonwood, Ash, Boxelder trees are sometimes removed and storms occur where not as many trees are replaced. He added that it is not feasible to plant every square inch of public property because there are utilities and other factors to consider. He noted that the City has 40% tree coverage which is more than in the past. He stated that the City could do more, but it is good to understand how we got to the numbers referred to in the assessment. Kluchka said that context is important and asked about the success of the Plymouth tree sale held every year. Eckman said the forestry staff would have a better sense of those numbers. Baker said he agrees with Blum Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission May 8, 2017 Page 6 regarding the low tree replacement rate, but what Eckman said is true and trees don't belong everywhere. He said in many places he'd rather see wild flowers, pollinators and nectar sources planted instead. Segelbaum referred to the question during the public comments regarding the reduction of power outages. Waldhauser said she thinks more could be done at a regional level than at the City level. Segelbaum referred to the question during the public comments about pesticides and herbicides and noted that the policies in goal four address those issues 1/�.�ldhauser noted that part of the resident's comment had to do with the effect on �`��op��ealth so that could probably be reflected in the goals and objectives. Blenker^�tated that�ublic health is missing from the goals. She stated that most of the goal� are�#��ected tc��vard sustainability and are not as much about making us stronger �� able to��unce;back when something bad happens. She added that she would a�� like �c�.�ee rr��r��bout herbicides and pesticides in the Comp Plan which could i "r�lud� �e�r�cation ef�orts about herbicides, pesticides, and lawns. Baker stated that it is dif�ult ti� �lant v�t�lflowers in this City and alternatives to lawns need to be made easr��, He ac�ded th�at i��re is push back from people but the City needs to enhance the percep�i�n.,that things other than grass are desirable. Blenker agreed and added another is��e is�?hospM,�r�s and the question of something being bad if a person can buy it in� store. . Segelbaum referred to the comment r€��n��howcas�ig energy efficiency. Waldhauser said she thinks the City newsletter �s��grea�edu�a��r��p�int which can also provide �z_ resources. �. Baker said this chapter is r��Ny�well`�one and he feels good about it. He said it is easy to go after the low hanging fruit��d h� �iopes��la� City will go after some of the harder issues that really affect change lyike fir�ai'r��al incentives and tax breaks. He said the ideas may not be popular, but whe�i h� looks'��all of the new homes being built and none of them have solar he se�s a missed ��ortur��ity. Segelbaum said the recently adopted PUD amenities language addr��s sorne of these issues as well. Johnson sa�t1�� '�pi�s�d`G�mp Plan language is pretty heavy on what the City will do but he w+�u�d li��to�do��`e to encourage residents to be more energy efficient. Kluchka said there r'�ight ��.stronger ways to encourage residents to be more energy efficient thrr��a�h Zonin��Cot��changes and the building permit process. Kluchka said h��would go as far as saying public health should be goal number seven as a resilience goal and a way to prepare people. Waldhauser agreed that that it is worth emphasizing. Kluchka asked the Commissioners if they feel like invasive species removal is being given enough attention. He said there may be opportunities to regain the forest environment but the City has got to step it up. Waldhauser agreed that there needs to be a strategy. Blum said he thinks it is important to prioritize educating people about invasive species. He said the City really needs to have a policy that does more than encourage people to remove Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission May 8, 2017 Page 7 them. He suggested that as property turns over homeowners could be required to remove Buckthorn. Kluchka said he is interested in being more proactive regarding community solar programs. Segelbaum stated that there could be people with preferred rates like with garbage haulers. Baker stated that the City could partner with a solar project. Blum referred to underground versus aboveground utilities and stated that a lot of people with aboveground utilities can't plant trees within 10 feet of the power lines. Segelbaum said he doesn't think they can really address how power is distributed. Blum said power lines can be buried, or perhaps during new construction or teardowns�#�e�Ci�y ean think about how it wants the distribution to look. :� � �x�,� � � Johnson referred to the vulnerability assessment and stated tl�t�t�there ar�some;�� contradictory statements in it so he is suggesting being cntic��1 whe�.i'�ading}ifi;n�or example it states that the City needs more tree canopy, b��in��ier loca#ion it stated that more canopy means more ticks and invasive species �egelb�r�m ��d that the City has a 40% tree canopy coverage and the assessm�r�t.,stated�hat a'��affhy tree canopy coverage is 30% so maybe that shouldn't be thei�,foc��: �� ''� �� . ,n� � �; � � °; �� ; Segelbaum stated that he thinks the Commi�Sion has`general cansensus on the themes and priorities and preliminary agreement on the proposed goals and objectives. The Commissioners agreed. : ��x -�� ' �� The meeting was adjourned at 8:48�p�ra John Kluchka, Se�retary` - Lisa Wittman, Administrative Assistant , �. k° •,"` ��+�� Special Meeting of the Golden Valley Planning Commission June 12, 2017 A special meeting of the Planning Commission was held at the Golden Valley City Hall, Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota, on Monday, June 12, 2017. _��d �„ Those present were Planning Commissioners Baker, Blenker, Blum, �J� nson,��chka, Segelbaum, and Waldhauser. Also present were Associate Plann�;an �� rant V'�ker �� Emily Goellner, Planning Manager Jason Zimmerman, Utility E�i�ieer R.;� I�ak �, City � � ' Engineer Jeff Oliver, and BARR Engineering Consultants K�er��h��t�fer and.�- reg Williams. Chair Segelbaum called the meeting to order at 6:3� p rY�,� �; �� ,.��, s 1. Presentation and Discussion (Water Resou�r,�e$� ,�� -��,�� ;.,x Goellner introduced the Water Resources chapt��of the C�knprehensive Plan and stated that the public values their water re�;�. es��She sai��he public has emphasized that they want to maintain parks and gr��n spa �, errab�,��sustainability, be inclusive of diversity, accommodate an aging�popC��i, ��a��n�ke improvements to � � � infrastructure. _ �� u „ �;' , Goellner introduced the goa�r��lirw��n the Water Resources memorandum. ��. �,r� R.J. Kakach, Utility Engine�r� ��sented �n wastewater and water resources. He said that only ten percer��r��qlde��alley's sewer system has been lined and rehabilitated, but that fifty-fiv��perc��fit h��ee�inspected at point of sale. Typically corrections are needed before ti��iou��can b��sold, which has improved inflow and infiltration complianc�t��the c��{� H��said that Golden Valley's sewer mains run into a system � , � r manag�by"��e�7te��pl�fan Council and that studies done by the Metropolitan Council haye dete��ed � r�duction as a result of the Point of Sale program. ,, � �. �� Segel��,�m as��d for more information about infilow and infiltration. � �; Kakach explained that inflow is when rainwater enters through things such as manholes and private property sump pumps that feed into sanitary sewer system and that infiltration is when groundwater seeps into the pipes. He stated that Golden Valley is losing capacity in the sewer system as a result, and the goal is to maintain capacity and reduce inflow and infiltration. Waldhauser brought up the fifty-five percent inspection rate and asked if that included both residential and commercial properties. Kakach confirmed that it did. He explained Special Meeting of the Golden Valley Planning Commission 12 June, 2017 Page 2 that the other forty-five percent has not been inspected because it is a voluntary program and corrections are not required until Point of Sale. He said that 47% of the city is compliant. Waldhauser asked how the city knows a property is compliant if not all properties are inspected. Kakach clarified that the properties not listed as compliant are either noncompliant or unknown. �� '�J" Kakach brought up challenges facing the City's system, which are infl��and ir��ltration, failing clay pipes from the 50s and 60s damaged by freeze-thaw c��d��s, and't�ot intrusions which back up pipes. He said that the average cost �e��nile to��air�,�� sanitary sewer is half a million dollars, and the challenge faci�i�� e ��is ho�r�� prioritize the necessary repairs. �, ��` ��„i� j Y4 d �* �# l�� Segelbaum asked what the difference was between was��ut��er�nd th� sanitary sewer. � Kakach said that they are the same system, but tk��t�h�#erm��`�� .�t�r„ refers to both sanitary and storm sewers. Kakach clarified that�is pres�ation refers to the sanitary sewer and that stormwater would be discus��la�er. �° �t.., , �s -z; � �, -�a'',�l ,� b,>y`, • �J = {, a Baker asked what the difference was betvr�e ��i��st of repairing the pipe and � � ,��Y.. replacing it. Kakach said the cost�� r��renced is an average for all rehabilitation but that repairing costs slightly I��s than�epla��r�� the pipe. � � ��-��" r� �� Blum asked if rehabilitatic��mitig��ed��t intrusion into the pipes. Kakach said that they could insert a grout into th��which �iould prevent root intrusions. x,� �>, Kakach outlined sanii��-y s�� c�d wastewater goals, which were to ensure adequate capacity, reduc��elir��te s��'iitary sewer overFlows, and reduce inflow and infiltration to a mana��lale le�t�� .-; ��, Kluchka ��ed��w�at the�frequency of sanitary sewer overflows are. Kakach said that th�`�i�re rare��d (��cur mostly during high intensity rainfall. � �� q; Baker re��d information on what would be considered a manageable level of inflow and infiltration. Kakach said inflow an infiltration can be tracked based on meters, but is difficult to measure. He stated that a manageable level would reduce it across the board and they are trying to line or replace as much pipe as possible. Kakach began the water supply presentation on drinking water. He explained that New Hope, Crystal, and Golden Valley purchase water from Minneapolis together and that Special Meeting of the Golden Valley Planning Commission 12 June, 2017 Page 3 some of the water main is owned by the joint commission but most is owned by Golden Valley. Kakach said that a challenge facing the city is water main breaks because they are difficult to predict even though water main breaks are tracked. He said that the average cost to rehabilitate the water mains is 1.4 million per mile, much more than the sanitary sewer. '� � Kakach outlined the goals for the city, which are to limit residential der��tnd, lii��daily demand, limit peak purchases from Minneapolis, and limit unaccou�te��f�r wate��vhich is the difference between what is bought and what is sold to res �nts. H�"�id t , city Y wants to maintain the current level of service of the system whr �elirr�!r�ating��;,�e � breaks, �� `✓ `� � �, � Kluchka asked what the difference was between Gold��Valle�"� ca� ��and peak usage. Kakach said that data indicates peak usage �as i�i��ser��ntee ��million gallons per day and that is has now decreased to five or�ic��mil��r�. He�� Golden Valley has even eliminated a pump in the reservoir becaus��lemand��d decreased and that he ��: feels comfortable with the capacity of the ��t�m 4�akach s�id he believes there is enough for current uses and possibly f� ome��xParr�i��Cluchka asked whether � limiting purchases has an impact on the��,st��k��_. ch said that it is considered best . "� x.�=y� � �-�� practice and good for sustainabili t � �it v��er, but it is also likely easier on the system to not have as much wat�r�asst��g thr�c��h it. � � � �� Waldhauser asked if ther��was i`��rrri�#'�n specifically on commercial water usage. Kakach said that records a��rt�#en do� by land use, but he did not have the information with hirr��Idhau�r brought up the issue of water waste in industrial and commercial us�s, and Kak��a��r�ed that would be a good place to look into conservation. � ' `�� . �;. � �� Segelb��rr��t� �l��fic�tion on what was meant by the word "limit" and whether it referred f� �d�i��ion in general or if there was a specific goal. Kakach agreed that "re"�uce" might�be�°better word. Segelbaum then asked why demand for water has �� decrea ed Ka��ch explained that water fixtures have grown more efficient, and there �r; �_� has beer��ation on water conservation. � Blenker asked what causes water main breaks and how long they typically last. Kakach said they are the result of freeze-thaw conditions, loading on top of water main, pressure variation, and corrosive soils. He said that there is variation in how long they are estimated to last, but in Golden Valley's soils, water mains have failed earlier than anticipated. Special Meeting of the Golden Valley Planning Commission 12 June, 2017 Page 4 Kluchka asked if there was data on trends in water main breaks and if that data tracks breaks related to age. Kakach said the he would estimate twenty to thirty breaks a year with an upward trend and that suspected causes are tracked. Waldhauser asked about the lining and replacing of water mains. Kakach explained that it can be done but is more expensive than the sanitary sewer because it is a pressurized system and requires more work. Waldhauser wondered if anyone was looking at separating potable water from other types of water. Kakach sai at in a �,� commercial setting, some people look at recycling water, but at a Cit��`��vel th��is limited research on the subject. �� {} �. Blum said that someone at an open house had mentioned t�h��tha��e Cif��rYis wells and he wanted to know if that was a program at one point. K��ac`��aid he v�s unaware of any City run wells at this point. There are three eme � ency��cku��►��`�owned by � JWC located in New Hope and Crystal that could su��ly rnin�i�al��se in�an emergency. � �� ! � � Segelbaum asked how long the contract to buy �ater fro►��llinneapolis is. Kakach stated that the contract was renewed for 2Q�r�ars�� 2004 ��d that Minneapolis has been selling water to other cities and ap�ears c�mfo�l�le��vith their capacity. � �� '� � s , �{��:..: Kluchka asked what the goal for i��v��'��d��filtration is. Kakach said that there is not a specific goal but that the Metrop��tan G��ncil r��nitors inflow, as does the City of Golden Valley. The goal is t��p�ci��1y address high volume areas and then �� _ reevaluate because mea �ring ir�f�ow`�r�d infiltration is difficult. Kluchka wanted to know � how Golden Valley's inflo ��_�filtration��compares to other cities. Kakach said that the inflow and infiltratior�;,�r�ra�m��s been successful, although it is difficult to find comparable citi�s. H�'��taf��:�at��e water main breaks may be slightly worse than comparable citie�;� � �� ` r�°;: � . �; Segelb��m��t�� : �ncerned about the age of the system and the financing of the ,, �. repairs. 1=��wa�d to know if there was a timeline for repairs. Kakach said that it is � �,. ea��to ansv� th�e questions, but that options for financing are being explored, and probl�i�a�areas��re being prioritized. He said that by 2040 the system will be past its designec�i��2�nd there is uncertainty about how to fund the needed repairs. He said there is a chance it may need to be repaired before 2040 but that it is difficult to predict an exact timeline. Kluchka asked how many miles of pipe have been lined or replaced. Kakach stated that there has been limited funding and repairs have been administered based on priority. Slightly over 10 miles of sanitary sewer have been lined and that he would estimate five Special Meeting of the Golden Valley Planning Commission 12 June, 2017 Page 5 to ten miles of water mains have been replaced. Kluchka recommended discussing what has been rehabilitated in the future draft of this chapter. Baker inquired about the life expectancy of a lining. Kakach said that the lifespan is fifty to 100 years, similar to a new pipe. Water main lining, which is a new technology, has a longer projected design life. Baker asked if, with that in mind, the focus would be more on rehabilitation than replacement. Kakach said that the sanitary sewer focus is mainly lining. The water main uses both but they are moving toward lining. Ba��ed if there was potential for saving money by doing multiple linings at the same �rt�e. Ka��i said there was some potential for savings if nearby parts were done sir��lt��ously. ��, � , �.� , 2� � .c � k ry Baker asked about the safety of the water main linings. Kakach �aid�t�� the I�J�nesota Department of Health signs off on the epoxy resins that are ��d��ver ac��€d that the linings being used have been certified as safe for cons��mptiort�iy th��l. �� nal Science Foundation. Baker asked if a replacement is higher�c��aalit}�'��n�reha�ilitation. Oliver said there are testing protocols that are used to ��`��u�re��ety�ir�� years to meet National Science Foundation ratings. Based on ��at is kn��n today, he said he is confident in the lifespan of the system bec�r��th� ateria�� used today are higher � quality than they were when the mains re m =..�Ilec�� .� �� Blum asked if the city had looked�r��o f1� va��e of using plants to control stormwater. Kakach said he was not present��on ��irmw��r and thought that the next presenter could answer the question b�� * % �� r �� . ��. �� ` Blum asked whether the e��t��f perm��able and non-permeable surfaces had been measured. He also v��n d to t��ow what kind of impact the use of pesticides and � �� herbicides had�n th��yst��'� �n�l�iow much it costs to remove it. Kakach said that there were requ��nen��ir he�icide and pesticide use. He said other people might be able to an��r:�the q��sti�n better. � � �� } Kakach c��luc��! his presentation. � �� ,. ',"�. ,�;:, r � Goellr�r_introc�:iced consultants Greg Williams and Karen Chandler to present on �: surface v��t��anagement. Williams began his presentation by outlining the focus of this section in the Comprehensive Plan. He said some of the things that were most important to residents were wetlands, habitats, shoreland, and stormwater runoff, but that other concerns such as infrastructure and water quality were very important to the City but might not be on residents' radars. For wetlands, habitats, and shoreland, Williams explained that the City is the Local Governmental Unit responsible for administering the Wetland Conservation Act. The Special Meeting of the Golden Valley Planning Commission 12 June, 2017 Page 6 City may partner with County and watershed organizations to manage aquatic invasive species. The City has development and redevelopment standards that regulate storm water runoff. There are also retrofit and redevelopment opportunities. In a developed city there is little room to implement new best practices, so redevelopment is often the best opportunity to improve infrastructure. Williams said things like Minimal Impact Design Standards had been used to help limit stormwater runoff. Williams referred to Blum's question about vegetative management of sta� ater runoff. Williams explained that the scale of precipitation events is an i�e Th�ree canopy provides interception for a fraction of an inch, but stormwa#�r rr��ageme is �, q;� desi ned to deal with much larger precipitation events. William��id veg�tive �ales 9 that help slow the runoff once it is on the ground may be a b�t��ra��e. �� 1 �. � �t � �'� �''� Gb�.�Pi�i. Williams moved on to lake and stream water quality, w��ch is a�� othe��s for surface water management. He said some water bodies in tl�� i � ��I�r ed s�impaired by C�C��,:r� � Minnesota Pollution Control Agency because th��fion��i�et�s��water quality standards, including Bassett Creek, Sweeney L��Ce, and V��th Lake, which does not � ._ meet chloride standards. � � � �' � X" ; �N._. Baker asked what the source of chlonde��s�,�1f��i�ms said that in the metro area, it typically comes from winter road �g`�m�r� � �k �� , .. �r *�.ti:'� t�:4 Blum asked what type of pr�i��t�ti��events were typical for infiltration. Williams says that infiltration practices ar�best°�r si��ller events because it varies so much .� depending on the type of s��lr ��explain�d that Golden Valley has a lot of clay soil, which limits infiltrati�=� port ies. Williams said filtration is another option that is � � eM helpful but diffi�lt an��op��tes°t�� binding pollutants in the soil. �r,. �,: riz Williams s��c� �at, � we{��as restoring impaired water quality, it is also important to maintai#� ar�� w��1�}��'h`v�iater quality. =��.. �� Wi�l��ms mo�� o�t�� the topic of education and public involveri�ent, the goal is to promo��„�positi.�,� behaviors. He recommended educating residents about best practices methods��.�`�rbicide and pesticide use. Williams stated that it is important to develop community capacity for educating people who will be good stewards. He emphasized cooperation with other organizations such as the Bassett Creek Watershed Commission. Williams said the next topic, water quantity and flooding, is a significant issue because it can effect public health and safety. He emphasized the need to minimize risk of floods and minimize impact of floods. He said there was a need to adapt to changing Special Meeting of the Golden Valley Planning Commission 12 June, 2017 Page 7 precipitation patterns because a trend toward larger and more frequent precipitation events increases the need for stormwater management, which is exacerbated by tight soils. Williams explained that erosion and sedimentation from stormwater runoff can carry dirt and pollution and can be combatted through permitting programs and implementing best management practices on City projects. �� r_s r. For Infrastructure and Operations, Williams said that the City needs to �rti-aintair��torm water infrastructure, including scheduled infrastructure replaceme��id��tifying f�r�ding � for replacing storm water systems. Williams said he will be deta�l��g these��;sue�� the separate Surface Water Management Plan to identify issues�wa��cr��e�an �� ,� � implementation plan to achieve the City's goals. � � s`�� Referring back to Blum's question about fertilizer an�es�td� �e, Williams said that �� .._� the impact depends on how they are applied and�v�ia��`�cher��s are. Some of what is washed away is treated through storm water r�anagem�j#, but there is no chemical � treatment to remove them from the water �s�du�,s from fe��ilizer or pesticides either settle or are washed downstream, which �nay c��ate�p�,�k�l�riis in other places. � � � Kluchka asked if phosphorous w�s�u��tl}�being treated. Williams said that �� phosphorous was being treated�f�rough��ltrati�i��and infiltration, binding the �.�� phosphorous to soil particle��o�� a+��not pollute the water. Blum asked if vegetative systems reduce the amo��of p�r�sp�Gous. Williams said that it may reduce the � "� concentration. However, s�t�et�es diss�lve, and that is much more difficult to treat. Infiltration is the pre�� pra��e because it does not show up in lakes if it goes into � � the ground. Alu�m can�lsd�`�� cl��d to lakes and storm water flow, which will bind f *� dissolved phospi�t�rous �filliam�said that Twin Lake has received an alum treatment in � the past. � � � �. � �h � �' � i:f Blum wan��l t�i�iow if"there was a metric to measure costs and effects and identify the � im{��t over�Fi�e.�illiams said that concentration of nutrients in water bodies is comrr`��ly use�r as a metric to measure water quality and compare it to state standards. Models c��l�o be developed to estimate how much pollutant loads are being reduced, which has been done on a project specific basis in Golden Valley. Blum asked if that was done every time a lot was developed. Oliver clarified that larger developments are required to implement best practices, but that as a fully developed first ring suburb Golden Valley has adopted a regional approach in stormwater management, conducting studies mainly on larger projects. He said that Golden Valley implements best practices strategically, where and when possible, like the constructed ponds by the Holiday Inn and on Xenia Avenue. Special Meeting of the Golden Valley Planning Commission 12 June, 2017 Page 8 Blum expressed concern about herbicide and pesticide use and said that he does not feel the City communicates well with residents about the issue. Oliver said that regulating individual properties and pesticide, herbicide, and fertilizer use is difficult and best approached through education. Oliver said there is not a metric to measure it but that continued education is key, and he feels that Golden Valley's education program is very strong. ��$ -� Blum asked Williams to address the impacts of permeable and non-p�� eab��,�rfaces and whether there was a way to monitor it. Williams explained tha t�er��re �"�' development standards that limit the rate of water coming off a �p�erty, ��th� ��est way to meet that is to limit the impervious surface. He said that��erer ;�� e pol�� to promote permeable surfaces and reduce runoff, which can b�do��artly `�informing developers of best practices and indirectly through City��regulai�ns.� �� "�� ..� � � �� r>> �.. �� Chair Segelbaum opened the floor for public cor��ien�s��8:0��,�. � �K ��, Dawn Hill, resident of the City and Environ��tal��mmisst�ner asked about drinking �� . water and whether a situation like Flintf �chig��, cd�l�:t��ppen in Golden Valley. She � wanted to know whose responsibility it��uld ��€u� that and asked whether drinking water safety should be included ir��e��m�r�hensive�Plan. She also wanted to know � �� whether lining the pipes would r ��ce��acit �; � � � Marty Micks, 90 Louisiar��ve �sk��! about Twin Lake. She said it was pristine in the t �.=. 1990s and wanted to knov��,� ` � went from being pristine to needing an alum treatment. She said��does�pt think residents are penalized for using additional water and that�he tfi��s��,��.,s��uld be some type of penalty to encourage residents to keep their wa usa��own��. She also wanted to know what trees are best to plant near wate��s o��roi �oot intrusions and whether the City has looked into how the � �: lining pl�ced�r�,��t��Avenue in 1994 is doing. � _r � � Se�tr�� no or��els��come forward, the floor was closed for comments. f� ��: „�;. ��ty Answerin� ��question about trees, Oliver said that forestry staff have a list of tree species that will do well. He said that trees with deep roots may impact pipes, but that there has not been a need for tree removal. Referencing Hill's question about whether lining water mains might reduce capacity, Oliver explained that friction is a factor in capacity, and the new lining is smoother. Even though the diameter is smaller the capacity remains the same or improves. He clarified that the sewer mains on Winnetka were replaced, not lined. Lining is a newer approach Special Meeting of the Golden Valley Planning Commission 12 June, 2017 Page 9 that was not in use at the time. He said some liners have done very well and that they are moving in the right direction. Referencing the comment on incentives to reduce water use, Oliver explained that the City has a tiered rate based on usage of water for bills, with a slight increase with more water use. However, the low range of a tier may pay as much as the high range of a tier. It is not charged per gallon. � ��. Waldhauser brought up the question on drinking water quality. Oliver �� laine��k�at the lead poisoning in Flint, Michigan was a unique combination of wate� ch��istry a`��r�lead service pipes and that Golden Valleydoes not have those type��pipes.��e w��r chemistry is consistent throughout the City of Minneapolis, a��w�des�read `�� contamination of water, like what happened in Flint, Michiga� n�„�nticipa'�d. �� _ Returning to the alum treatment in Twin Lake, Chandler i��m�e�that�e alum �� . treatment was actually a positive case. The Bass��re��Wafer`��d Commission had a goal to protect bodies that have good water q��lity. Som��phosphorous seemed to be causing water quality to decline in Twin L��7 0�i� alum t�atment was used to address the phosphorous coming into � , �er fr � th��`�.e��nt. There was budget set � � aside for two treatments, but the seconc��t�reat��J�s not been needed yet. Chandler � � ��; �� emphasized that this was a posit��f�� in"�hich a potential issue was addressed right away an d di d no t be c o m e a b i g �i f o b l e r ri�'` �_ �� =_ Baker wanted to know wh�t��the �urc"��f phosphorous from sediment was in the Twin �.� , �� Lake case. Chandler said � ��iave be�n as a result of higher temperatures in the rx summer. Oliver saic��Fr�t� hos�orous in the sediment comes from natural sources and reminded the c�mmis��o��h�a fi�eninsula was a pasture for a long time, which may be a contributin��acto��n �f�e��reased phosphorous. � � � � � �� `� �� Chair S��e�b�ur� ��t��d�the public hearing at 8:15. � �� , � Ch�r�Segel��m�ked if the Planning Commission should table the discussion of the goals��the ��nprehensive Plan Water Resources Chapter until the next meeting �,� since the��?� also a Regular Meeting Planned for the same night. Goellner recommended tabling the item on the agenda for the Regular Meeting instead since it was less time sensitive than the Comprehensive Plan discussion. She also suggested not focusing on specific language in the Comprehensive Plan goals and objectives but focusing instead on broader topics and solutions. Special Meeting of the Golden Valley Planning Commission 12 June, 2017 Page 10 Segelbaum pointed out that Goals 4, 5, 6, and 7 and said that they seemed to relate to the sanitary sewer and water mains, whereas Goals 1, 2, 3, and 4 seemed to relate to surFace water. He proposed beginning with the second half of the Goals and Objectives. Segelbaum brought up an element that had already been discussed: the word "limit" used in Goal 6, where the intent was "reduce". Waldhauser asked what a realistic improvement would be and how that a�€��l be �� implemented in the planning process. Segelbaum expressed that he��Id lik��w see a more quantitative approach. Goellner clarified that this is a policy �I�n ��ch doe�ot generally have specific number targets, but that the implement�,t��n secti�o�c�f th�� chapter would have specific targets. The Commission agreec�fo wait,��d se��i��at the specific targets in the chapter were. �� .�� '� Baker brought up the idea of a metric to measure tl��e t�►�t�s b��ter. I-�e said that seemed especially suitable for Goals 1-3, and th��hey��oul��easuring and �x reporting to the community. He pointed out that i other cl� ters there had been � �� metrics and measurements provided. � � � �� ,��_ �� a �ry � Y'=` .fr4 s,::r. Segelbaum brought up the phrasing "m�ag�k��l�rsl". Baker said he would like that �:; to be defined more specifically. �� Blenker asked about su � �r�entation�steps and said that she had seen those 99��t��n�� provided in other chapter��,Segel�aurt� �qreed that previous chapters had implementation steps liste� n�l��ianted �� know why this one did not. Goellner said that � �. working with three c��t�ltants�� this chapter had complicated coordination and that �hat the stratec,,�s ar�'�kel�t��be�imilar now to what they were ten years ago. �-� �_ �4 t i �� Baker bro��#�p t�� se�nd objective of Goal 5 and wanted to know what strategies it was ref��m�t� ��''��i�� that when it comes to stormwater management the system is so larg��c�°s�expensive that upgrades are often implemented when the opportunity ans�rather�an �sed on objective goals. He said that the current information is incornp��te, wh��h makes it difficult to set goals. With precipitation the focus will be on flood sto��nd minimizing property damage, which is already being done. Segelbaum asked for clarification about Goellner's earlier comments on implementation. He said hearing that the same strategies are being used as ten years ago worried him and that it sounds like the City is not making progress. Oliver said he agreed with Goellner's comment. The goals laid out in the last Comprehensive Plan remain the same because they are still applicable. He said the trend throughout the region has been to move away from reliance on groundwater to surface water, which Golden Valley Special Meeting of the Golden Valley Planning Commission 12 June, 2017 Page 11 already does. He emphasized that the goals are viable but very difficult to measure and that he believed Golden Valley is ahead of many comparable cities in dealing with these issues. Segelbaum asked whether the City was pushing off necessary infrastructure repairs and what should be done to ensure that future residents are not burdened by lack of action now. Oliver agreed that the condition of infrastructure is important and that if the Commission thinks so they should rank that priority accordingly. Goellne��d�d that �p �`r there are more policies in the water resources chapter than any other��apter,�taling 22 policies. She said she thought it would be better to focus on pri��tiz�� which�goals are most important during this night's meeting. �� ` -y �,�x '�� Blum said he thought that to choose what is most important I�� ne�i�ed sorrte type of concrete measure to see what is being done over time ��lohns�� saic��h��e�seemed to be a lot of data and �was not sure what Blum was lo ��ng f� lu�n saicr``�that he thought �� 4. �� t. staff understood the metrics best and would like��re ��r�ianc��r��n staff about what is being done. Baker suggested that objectives for�ome of t�r� goals be to provide or � T. develop monitoring metrics. �� ,�� :;�� Oliver emphasized that there is regul�r rri��it�i��b the Bassett Creek Watershed ,kks`— �[C'., Commission and required standa��s�ia� m�� be met. He said that there is continued progress on Sweeney Lake and�l�rth L,�e. �-I��aid that while not every project and goal is outlined in the Com��'��si��an they were being worked on consistently. Segelbaum asked wheth��hey��ou��quest that staff report these measurements, �� and the Commission agre�d� � �� Baker said tha� he tho�g��,��re��`.`� uld be better integration of the goals. He said the integration of wh�#�use�� be t�►ree chapters into one chapter did not seem effective and he th��t sta�;�ou��l.,improve that. Waldhauser pointed out that Goal 4 effectively mentio��d �I�oY�ip��,t�of water resources. She mentioned that many of the potential problems r�L�t�� Goal 4 and infrastructure. Segelbaum said that some of the goals do no��ull all th��sp��ts of water resources together. �.S�Y, y.:.,-_: ?� Segelba��.�i�ed if any commissioners had further comments on Goals 4-7. Johnson brought up the third objective of Goal 5 and wanted to know that the data in the forecasts was legitimate. He also said he thought there needed to be a plan to pay for the cost of rehabilitating the pipes and that the goals and objectives should address this. Segelbaum agreed and said it was important to the community to show that steps are being taken to improve the situation. Special Meeting of the Golden Valley Planning Commission 12 June, 2017 Page 12 Waldhauser brought up Goal 7. She said she thought there was a public education component to all of the goals and that education did not necessarily need to be its own goal. She said she would rather see an objective for each goal addressing the public education component. Baker agreed that there is a public education component in each goal and suggested leaving the education goal but crafting an education policy for each goal. Blum suggested changing Goal 7 to "incentivize" the public rather than "��n�r�zk�e". � ��;�. Segelbaum said he believed incentives could be built into the other g . Go�t�er agreed that "involve" was a loose verb and that she liked the idea�f in��tivizing��aker � � � z:� � said that being more educated on a topic should incentivize pe�z��to do°fi�fi rigf��hing. Kluchka recommended that incentives be a policy and that tk�e'�`t�cen��s be��i��d to achieve a goal. He said he also believed that incentives shou�'d b�`�ddres�d across � the chapters of the Comprehensive Plan. � ��, � ��:�=� � � � �� . Moving onto Goals 1-3, Segelbaum asked if any � he�er c�rn�ssioners had input on those goals. Blum said that rather than achie��g sta�n��ds, he thought residents might like to see Golden Valley exceed th��and`�i�`ds. He p�"oposed more positive language like "exceed" rather than achi��r2. Se�elb�i��ed engineering staff if exceeding those standards was reali$tic�"�liv��s�at it is very difficult just to meet the minimums, and that while exce��ii�� th�`t� would�be admirable, he thought it would be very difficult. He said staff wit��iscu��the de�ire and incorporate it in a way that makes sense. Segelbaum ��#�ia�,��ere realistic, he thought the city should aim high. � .. � � Baker said that knowing ��en e�"�ee��€�was reasonable should be up to staff. Blum pointed out that Comprehe��e��lans ar� aspirational, and that not all goals would be achieved. � � �� _,; �, ,,;� � �c � �� ,��,_ Johnson pointe��ut th�tt�he la��bullet from Goal 1 was replicated in Goal 5. Goellner explained��;�„�ad ��n��ne in an attempt to integrate more, but that using the same langua��ma�n��,been an effective way to do that. z�� .. Ba��, said h��hou`ht there should be an objective under Goal 1 to reduce the use of chloric��,in stre�t maintenance. Segelbaum asked if there were other options, and Baker said tha�Y��ould let staff deal with that since the Comprehensive Plan is aspirational. Segelbaum suggested adding it as a policy instead of an objective. Blum suggested generalizing it to say "reduce the use of harmful chemicals in maintenance", and Segelbaum agreed that sounded good. Waldhauser wanted to know what "minimize hydrological alterations to Bassett Creek" means. Williams clarified that referred to anything that might change the velocity or flow of water and have unintended negative environmental consequences. Baker asked if Special Meeting of the Golden Valley Planning Commission 12 June, 2017 Page 13 that could be framed in a more aspirational way to enhance the creek. Williams replied that he thought that had been addressed in other goals. Segelbaum asked whether the language could be changed to make more sense to laypeople. Waldhauser said she was surprised to see it there because there had been alterations to Bassett Creek that seemed positive. Williams said that recent alterations had been done to undo previous changes, which has been prioritized by the Minnesota Division of Natural Resources. He clarified that the language is in the spirit of maintaining things as they would occur naturally. The commission agreed they thought that point needed revisian� ��a��-= � 4 Waldhauser said she liked Goal 2 and appreciated the emphasis ��,w�� ;r as a� � �. : desirable amenity. Segelbaum asked if she thought it was emph�'ized si��ientl��and Waldhauser said that she thought Goal 2 was very well don .�B�ker��` `d he Y�ke�� the � second-to-last objective on Goal 2 and hoped to build on tha��s �n�pport��ity to improve shoreland protection. �� r ��`� `�� r� �� s:� � � Blum said that he frequently hears questions abc�i�pe�`�ntr��f��`�mosquitoes and wanted to know if that should be addressed in tt�� chapter��egelbaum said that he agreed some of these items should be balar��d v��th the liv��„ bility of the community r�;��. c.. b = �,``N'� since it is difficult to enjoy the commun��r iivith t��m�h��. Blenker wanted to know if the city was involved in mosquito contro�i �oel � r�plied that there is a regional body that dealt with the mosquito popu ��br� Ba ��said he thought that the regional mosquito control body does a g�� job �id h��s not worried about it. Goellner suggested raising the ques � t ,"nvironmental commission. � �� try� �� . � Segelbaum asked what th��teps would be for this chapter. Goellner said that the document would be��:s�ntecf tc2 the City Council the next day, after which the � �. consultants would beg�n w��Cx ri�riting the chapter. She said a completed document � would be presen��d to ��'lan�iing Commission in the fall with a full detailed policy plan that they u�� be��e �t�agive feedback on. o s� � >� � � The mee�i��,waS�adjourned at 9:09 pm. � �;�. �, ��, �" �� "�,.�� John Kluchka, Secretary Kayla Grover, Community Development Intern Regular Meeting of the Golden Valley Planning Commission June 12, 2017 A regular meeting of the Planning Commission was held at the Golden Valley City Hall, Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota, on Monday, June 12, 2017. Those present were Commissioners Baker, Blum, Johnson, Kluchka, Se��eJbaum, and Waldhauser. Also present were Planning Manager Jason Zimmerman ��so�t� � . Planner and Grant Writer Emily Goellner, and Community Develop�e��ntern l��rla Grover. Segelbaum called the meeting to order at 9:10 pm. �� F �;. � s��. 1. Approval of Minutes �- �� M #'. �� Johnson referred to his comment on page 6, in which fi'� �id th�# "neig�bors will always <�,,� do things to annoy each other" and asked that b��. �- � . �� MOVED by Baker seconded Johnson, and r��tio��arried u�animously to approve the May 22, 2017, Regular Meeting minutes u��°�h tt�� re�t��r��cussed. � � �� :. 2. Discussion -- Places of As��l�:;� �:� Goellner introduced the topi��d t�i��aff had�done research on how religious uses are treated in the Zonmg .��,�de ��►� ha`�i,,,some recommended changes. Segelbaum brought up the item relate��o fe�i�ral lav��and asked if there was any sort of time sensitive componen.�-tc� upda��f the code. Goellner said that there were not currently any lawsuits or com�l�ir��N3� _ ; MOVED b� luchl�;,.se��nded by Baker, and motion carried unanimously to table the � t �� discuss��n t��t`��s�#,A�sembly until June 26, 2017. .�.�. ';� 3. �, Othe�Bu��ess t;, '�� _ •��cil Liason Report (none) 4. Election of Officers There were three positions up for election: Chair, Vice-Chair, and Secretary. MOVED by Segelbaum, seconded by Johnson, and motion carried unanimously to elect Baker as Chair of the Planning Commission. Regular Meeting of the Golden Valley Planning Commission June 12, 2017 Page 2 MOVED by Segelbaum, seconded by Blum, and motion carried unanimously to elect Johnson as Vice-Chair of the Planning Commission. MOVED by Baker and motion carried unanimously to elect Kluchka as Secretary of the Planning Commission. The meeting was adjourned at 9:19 pm. fi x� �� .,,� ��, ��k£'�. ��^ �£ �'i;:�- �"=^�,z > �4 5 ��ci '_,� "i°'� �s � ss �� John Kluchka, Secretary � ' - �� > >- � �� . � �� : �� "> `-i� � �' Kayla Grover, Community Development Intern � �`� �� ,� $ r, �� . ��, # , � . .,�� ' � �� i �� h� �. � ; .,< � � kq � � � �_ � �� `�� NI�.. = +�� r� ?� th � � �` � �.. xF�i�� r z �'� �� „r ^�;�:.� 4 �� , �� .� �� I�hys%call�eve�c�prn��t�►� Depar��n.rent ��-s��-��ss�z��-��-��o�t�� Date: June 26, 2017 To: Golden Valley Planning Commission From: Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager Subject: Informal Public Hearing—Conditional Use Permit (CUP-157)to Allow for Accessory Retail Services Incidental to a Permitted Use at 8838 7th Avenue North —Skylab Glass Arts, Applicant � . .. � .. o�� " i��,� Background and Proposed Use David Schuster, representing Skylab Glass Arts, is proposing to include an accessory retail component to accompany a primary studio art use located at 8838 7t" Avenue North. This property is zoned Light Industrial and guided for long-term Light Industrial use. Retail sales are allowed as an accessory use with a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) ifthe retail area occupies less than 10% of the building's gross floor area. The subject property is bounded by 7th Avenue North to the south and industrial properties to the north. It is directly across the street from the TruStone Credit Union and the Perkins and Culver's restaurants. The applicant intends to lease approximately 3,185 square feet of space in a multi-tenant building. The proposed retail component would use 400 square feet in a building with 66,142 square feet gross floor area. This translates to roughly one half of 1%of the building's total square footage.Two other accessory retail uses already occupy 5.9% of the building. Three other accessory retail uses already occupy 8.6% of the building. Together, the four accessory retail uses would occupy less than 10% of the building's gross floor area. The applicant writes that the studio will be set up to support eight monthly renters and have space at a large table for eight members of the general public to use in three hour blocks. Monthly renters would have 24 hour access to the facility. There is some hope that evening or weekend classes could be held at some point in the future during the holiday months. The accessory retail portion of the building would be used to sell tools and raw materials for the glass arts process; these are currently often shipped to local artists from greater distances. The applicant anticipates that only one to two dozen customers from the general public would visit the retail use during the week. In addition to the owner, three other artists will be employed at the studio. If the CUP were to be approved, the applicant proposes days and hours for the retail operation of 9 am —9 pm seven days a week. The hours for the other accessory retail locations in the building are currently as follows: New to You Thriftique 10 am—5 pm on Wednesdays and Fridays, 10 am —7 pm on Thursdays Emptv the Nest 10 am —6 pm on Mondays, 10 am —6 pm on Saturdays, 11 am —5 pm on Sundays Bi� Deals Liquidation Outlet 11 am —6 pm on Tuesdays thru Thursdays, 10 am—5 pm on Fridays and Saturdays The site has a front parking lot that contains 112 spaces. The applicant has been assigned six of these spaces, though they are not signed or reserved for individual tenants. A rear toading area handles deliveries and shipping. By code, retail uses require one parking space for every 250 square feet of gross floor area. There are no good equivalent uses for a glass arts studio listed in the Zoning Code, so staff has estimated the parking requirements to be no more intense than for a fabricating use which is one space per 500 square feet of gross floor area. Based on these ratios and the proposed layout, the applicant would need: 400 sq. ft. retail @ 1 space per 250 sq. ft. 1.6 2,785 sq. ft. studio 1 space per 500 sq. ft. 5.6 7.2 spaces required Similar to the other accessory retail uses permitted in the building, staff is recommending a condition of approval be included that requires the applicant to work with the City to revise hours and parking if necessary to address any issues that arise. Evaluation The findings and recommendations for a Conditional Use Permit are based upon any or all of the following factors: 1. Demonstrated Need for the Proposed Use: The applicant indicates the glass arts studio—and specifically the accessory retail component—will fill a need in the community and provide a local outlet for materials and equipment. 2. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan: A studio art use with an accessory retail component is consistent with the City's vision to bring more activity and variety of uses to the transitional area west of the downtown, and is not incompatible with the Light Industrial designation of this property on the General Land Use Plan Map. 3. Effect on Property Values: Staff anticipates the new use would have no impact on the surrounding property values. 2 4. Effect on Traffic: The number of trips associated with the proposed use is moderate and spread throughout the day and week. Staff does not expect any negative traffic impacts to the surrounding areas. 5. Effect of Increases in Population and Density: The proposed use is not anticipated to significantly increase the number of employees at the location. 6. Increase in Noise Levels: The proposed use is not anticipated to cause an increase in noise levels. 7. Impact of Dust, Odor, or Vibration:The proposed use is not anticipated to cause an increase in dust, odor, or vibrations. 8. Impact of Pests:The proposed use is not anticipated to attract pests. 9. Visual Impact: Because the proposed use would involve only interior modifications, staff does not anticipate a change in the visual quality of the property. 10. Other Impacts to the City and Residents: Staff does not anticipate any other negative effects of the proposed use. The location is a multi-tenant light industrial property with adequate parking to serve the individual uses. Recommended Action Staff recommends approval of Conditional Use Permit 157 allowing for accessory retail services incidental to a permitted use at 8838 7th Avenue North. The approval of a Conditional Use Permit is subject to the following conditions: Plannin� 1. The plans submitted by the applicant dated May 17, 2017, shall become a part of this approval. 2. In the event complaints to the City regarding parking are deemed by the City Manager or his/her designee to be significant, the City reserves the right to require signage be installed to highlight the existing six parking spaces in the front parking lot and to reserve them for customer use. Other modifications to the days or hours of operation may be required to adequately address parking concerns. 3. If classes are proposed in the future, the applicant shall work with City staff to structure the hours and size of the classes so as to function efficiently with the other tenants and uses in the building. Fire 4. The applicant shall contact the Golden Valley Fire Department to schedule a routine fire inspection after occupying the space. 5. This approval is subject to all other state, federal, and local ordinances, regulations, or laws with authority over this development. Attachments Location Map (1 page) Applicant's Narrative (1 page) Proposed Floor Plan received May 17, 2017 (1 page) Site Plan (1 page) 3 --. _ __ _._ 8 58 _ _ _______.._�_-------- 860 g25 853 905 850 825 r 9105. $� 825 �'�^.. 820 830 4 801 800 810�� . , �� 747 7� 835 102 ' 8838 7th Ave N �45 ;,o$ > >o� �200 ` 745 112� � 730 �0 i ; � � � `�; � i �, �, � .�..� , 3 112 �pq 101 '__ f 2� �� y 884C883E883288:8888188816 8808$804 � , 't 203W202203 149 ��105 103 8836 8832 8824 8814 88128806 710 ; : ' BuildingA � ii 204 205A 1u� 102 �i1 209207206 ` ` %� � �2056 8800 � �-. 4<� -Buildinq8 �,.� , .. ..� , _ , ..�. .. � �tv�. 12?�ii t .< t, G;,idc�'- 010 12 8525 7 9y 1Y 9140 8845 300 �88 3 8900 G05 y�� 100 i • 200 W 723456 9050 �00 8806 � C101 12� • � '� 9s9110 600 � _,;�...... w l , ' `� _.. w �„_.,� � .M... _ 8950 ..'•^`.,.» _'y...--••.`"'"...._ co _ ' 9100 9010 � ._ `�'w _ ��,rrw :: . � ' • -_' __ - _ _ N` S`�'r . ,.,.r�"r"+"' _- +;lale IiJJY=..�' ' �...^'.'"_ - � ... _ .,w,:'""" y5ta�e HWY N� h - r � :..-. 'p , . ,��- ..... -' ". tA"� . � . ;� - , 8815 '` , Hello, my name is David Schuster, my wife, Marnie and I grew up in Golden Valley on opposite sites on Medley park,we met in first grade(1976) at Sunny Hollow and both lived in Golden Valley till College,we re-connected at our Armstrong twenty year class reunion,we have 4 wonderful children. Marnie is a nurse in the family birth center at Methodist, and we owned two Jimmy John's that we recently sold, now we are planning a new adventure in the glass arts business. Skylab Glass arts is a glass arts studio that will have a small area (400-500sqft) dedicated to retail sales of Lampworking/Beading tools and raw materials,there is nowhere in the Midwest to purchase raw borosilicate glass, or equipment,all the artists I know currently have glass/tools shipped from North Carolina or Oregon/California at great cost. We will be buying raw materials in bulk,trucking it in and selling raw glass by the case or smaller to the local glass artist in Minnesota. I don't foresee more than a few people a day purchasing and not being a renter at the studio. That brings us to the second part of the business plan,we will have room for 8 monthly renters(hoping to expand to 10) and a large rental table that will have 8 spots at it for the general public to come in and rent, the plan is for 4-3 hour blocks per day we will be open from 9am-9pm, rental blocks from 9-12, 12- 3, 3-6, 6-9. Our hours of operation to the general public will be 9am-9pm with the monthly renters having 24 hr access via the back door. I am planning on asking RE Micheal about using their lot for afterhours parking (they are directly behind us). I eventually would like to do classes on the weekends or some weeknights during holiday months, I believe holiday ornament groupons would be a great way of driving business to the area. Next year it is our hope to be included in the community education catalogue of classes for adults, bead making is easy and in expensive.We can also do ornaments, pendants, cabinet/drawer pull handles and marbles.There are a lot of options for easy community education classes that by next year we will be ready to teach. I cannot imagine that at any point all of the monthly renters and the hourly rental table spots will be in use at the same time, however if we do, the maximum number of people will be 16 and I am going to assuming a large portion of the hourly renters will be couples or friends who drive together. Thank you for your consideration,we are very excited to join the Golden Valley community again. David & Marnie Schuster Skylab Glass Arts 8838 7th Ave N �k� l�� s �� ( Golden Valley III 8838 7th Ave N Golden Valley, MN 55427 �� ; Details Office Sq. Ft. : 800 � Warehouse Sq. Ft. : 2,385 � Loading : di Clear Height : 18 - —. . � Warehouse Rate�r�",� Q T . � %�'�6�� Features � 1: � � w�� d � � � �� ,�� \ � / � � `�7 � � �y ._r.`� s.�r� 9 ��a'� a�x �-tl �`� �- �4��--�1 - {o..�, ;,,, �'�-� �� ° ��;..:�.►r.�� '�� ;�� . � 17 1 3 MAY 20 7 � ;; The information M1erein was o�S191rf�tl�hortrsources believed to be reliable;however,Steiner Development makes no guarantees,warranties,or representations as to the completeness or accuracy thereaf.The presentati this property is submitted subject to errors,omissions,rhange of price or conditlons prior to sale or lease,or withdrawal without notice. .,_,_...,..-. ..__„- _...._._.._.. _ _....., e_.._ .__._ ..,__._ _..._... .._..,_,.__ _ . --., .5,. .... ta �� F W o� . - r. . - � t� '� ��"� � wG A x*r �. '� ' �� + ��zk 3�.�`��+�.�,��,'� �: '�� :� �' s "�� t�` � '� � .: 8 �d'v�",:s4�p � v +�kY �'':� t + .� �� 'w�',��r�.�`a�'�;.�'a��y� �.�, � r,,�, �,�f.y�+�s- 3 ;� i ;� � .� t �r. - �sr � ,�.:'�o-.�,'� ��r y'4. .�..�y�l�� t,�k,��r -�F ,�'�.,� �r� � � �^4 u `5 �" �*,a,:� � a� Sl{�i�r �y�-#we �` M�py'�;N i" a�q�0 91��.�i!-bS��P�3FyA�(��'.!�(Y,��„R�I�A��i��'i}.4��1�t'S'�F�3� � JJ� }tr ��R��',��k��C �y ��<��`y� ( . �(� _---+ '� fi �fi"��++/ �� '`�b�J'��P�4�..f��.F��L��L� Yw.��., ��.?u � �4.�" �3'T"� �'�Y §1.7' ,.a�"� +��j^.v�...L`Frt ��S^ �� 1.A/a� �� 5-�:s.r'�' .'��.,;� .-�U� ..k., .��t t�s �� `�.�y�'�.,,�y, �� r�'�"-a�',,'�%� � ,a`��s.�'. ��,�."�� '� ' PRo�cT: GOLDEN VALLEY III S • SITE PLAN te�ner 8804-8840 7TH AVENUE NORTH Develo ment, Inc. GOLDEN VALLEY, MN. ��o �� Roa� aha,� fsss) 473-5650 SHEET N0: 1 DnTE: 2�2�2010 ona o, ��ao a 1 fax: 952j 473-7058 DECATUR AVENUE NORTH _ I � .,f ( � i � J� �� 4U e � h� �� I 8840 i, ' h e8 � GI I i ; � �e ' 8838 �I ' �. � ` I �d 8836 � � Iee32 e�- � 1 2 8834 I � 2 �•.-' 8B32 � � 'I I �o � � 8830 I eaza esSo � � �4 �• 8824 I � e8zo ae2p ... I O �0 8e3" 1.�:�. 8820 Z �0 � �a � d g�g{e I 8818 I Z eeis eeie w edie eete { � I edf8 �e � Q I te �78 � 8816 I . 8816 I = 8814 8916 � � j� � 8814 BB11 � � t4 �14 8814 I BC74 8812 ��I 1 0072 �� 1 I �z � 88,z i z 2 � 8808 � �/08 8606 . eeoe 8808 ( � seoa � � I ieoe � 8806 .\ 8eo6 � dH04 � I � � eao4 � 8804 I 4 88p4 � .G ( Z A �--- -------— - -- -- 2 - BOONE AVENUE NORTH �� ,�:��. Ph��ic�.l :L�+�velo�rnent I�e�art�m.�n� as�-��-�c�s��•��-��c��x� Date: June 26, 2017 To: Golden Valley Planning Commission From: Emily Goellner, Associate Planner/Grant Writer Subject: Zoning Code Text Amendment—Discussion —Amending Zoning Code to Comply with the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA) Background The City sporadically receives inquiries from religious organizations that are interested in relocating to Golden Valley. Currently, the Zoning Code only allows churches in the Institutional "I-1" Sub-District, which is designated primarily for churches and schools. The definition of a church in the Code includes "a synagogue, rectory, parish house or similar building incidental to the principal use which is maintained and operated by an organized group for religious purposes." All of the properties currently zoned for I-1 use are long-established churches and no vacancies exist at this time. These properties are located primarily in large, customized buildings in residential neighborhoods (see attached map). The organizations inquiring are often interested in smaller spaces, sometimes in the Commercial and Light Industrial Zoning Districts. Staff conducted research and determined that adjustments should be made to the Zoning Code in order to improve compliance with federal law. Adjustments would also offer more opportunities to religious organizations as well as building owners in Golden Valley. The Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA) protects religious institutions such as churches, synagogues, mosques, temples, and religious schools from burdensome and discriminatory land use regulations at the local level of government. The Act was passed by congress in 2000 after several lawsuits were filed against local governments around the country. The League of Minnesota Cities and the American Planning Association have recommended that all City governments review their Zoning Codes to be sure that the Code: • Treats all religious institutions in the same way, regardless of denomination • Allows religious institutions in the same Zoning Districts where other similar non-religious institutions are allowed (examples include private clubs or lodge halls) • Allows religious institutions in a reasonable amount of Zoning Districts by right so that special or conditional permits are not the only way to occupy a building • Reduce the necessity for a Conditional Use Permit as much as possible (thereby reducing risk of overly burdensome or discriminatory conditions of approval) • Site development requirements such as landscaping, off-street parking, height, and setbacks must be practical and no more restrictive than requirements for similar land uses Summarv of Staff Recommendations: • Strike the word "Church" from the City Code and define it under a more encompassing definition of"Places of Assembly" (a combined definition indicates equal treatment among these uses) • Allow Places of Assembly in all Institutional Sub-Districts (I-1 through I-5) • Consider whether to allow Places of Assembly by right (as long as all other city code requirements are met) in Commercial, Business and Professional Offices, I-394 Mixed Use, and Light Industrial Districts, or to require a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for uses of a certain size (with size threshold yet to be determined) • Continue to prohibit Places of Assembly in the Industrial Zoning District • Prohibit Places of Assembly in all Residential Zoning Districts (R-1 through R-4) • Update parking requirements for Places of Assembly and allow shared parking arrangements with adjacent properties Recommended Definition Places of Assembly: A facility or portion thereof,together with its accessory buildings and uses, where a group of persons of similar beliefs or associations assemble for religious services, social events, or similar purposes. The term includes, but is not necessarily limited to, churches,temples, synagogues, mosques, lodge halls, and private clubs. Recommended Permissions Staff recommends that Places of Assembly be permitted by right in several Zoning Districts unless the use is of a certain size (yet to be determined) or includes a certain set of accessory uses, which could include child care facilities, classrooms, and soup kitchens or meal centers. Existing and Proposed Land Use Permissions Proposed for Zoning District Existing "Places of Assembly" Institutional (I-1) Churches Permitted Permitted Institutional (I-2) Not Listed Permitted Churches Not Listed Institutional (I-3) Lodge Halls, Private Clubs are Permitted Conditional Institutional (I-4) Not Listed Permitted 2 Existing and Proposed Land Use Permissions Zoning District Existing Proposed for "Places of Assembly" Institutional (I-5) Not Listed Permitted Permitted for small institutions Commercial Not Listed Conditional for large institutions Conditional with Accessory Uses Permitted for small institutions Business and Not Listed Conditional for large institutions Professional Office Conditional with Accessory Uses Permitted for small institutions I-394 Mixed Use (A, B, C) Not Listed Conditional for large institutions Conditional with Accessory Uses Permitted for small institutions Light Industrial "Institutional Uses" Prohibited Conditional for large institutions Conditional with Accessory Uses Industrial Not Listed Prohibited Residential (R-1, R-2, Not Listed Prohibited R-3, R-4) Accessory uses typically include child care facilities, classrooms, and soup kitchens (also referred to as meal centers). This proposal is consistent with current permissions given to Child Care Facilities, Adult Day Care Facilities, and Recreational Facilities in the Code (which requires a Conditional Use Permit in several Districts). Soup kitchens are not currently listed in the Code. Therefore, a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) would be required for Places of Assembly in several Zoning Districts when accessory uses are present.This would give the Planning Commission and City Council the ability to impose conditions on the recommendation of approval in order to address any areas of concern, which would most likely be associated with traffic, parking, increases in density, and noise. If an owner applies for a CUP, the Zoning Code states that the Planning Commission shall make findings and recommendations to the Council based upon any or all of the following factors (which need not be weighed equally): 1. Demonstrated need for the proposed use 2. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan of the City 3. Effect upon property values in the neighboring area 4. Effect of any anticipated traffic generation upon the current traffic flow and congestion in the area* 5. Effect of any increases in population and density upon surrounding land uses* 6. Increase in noise levels to be caused by the proposed use* 7. Any odors, dust, smoke, gas, or vibration to be caused by the proposed use 8. Any increase in flies, rats, or other animals or vermin in the area to be caused by the proposed use 3 9. Visual appearance of any proposed structure or use 10. Any other effect upon the general public health, safety, and welfare of the City and its residents *Factors most associated with Places of Assembly Summary of Recommendations Staff is seeking input from the Planning Commission on these concepts. If the Commission agrees with the majority of the suggested changes, staff will schedule public hearings to review underlined/overstruck language in the City Code. Attachments Map of Religious Institutions in Golden Valley (1 page) 4 ^ a N � � � Q y� G � o � a`� ,�,� rnt � ` t a� r--------------10 V ----------- -•------ ---• -;.�_.�..�.._._.._.._ o � �-��;-------- . o i . � �.„�- .� i o 'm 1 H ang yi[ y� °� Y � �'� � � I / . � � �^ a��'i I / *Q�' � � �� N1 � p �. �+.� � ��.: � � � j �� .E p N pCj I � N L �'O � y u�1 f. -�c . � '� c J O � j t ` +°p° � i � h'n�C9 � V � � `--------------------------�^-----•------ °� °� a�o r t �:-� , � c �-�, r V i o m Q-� � � � � c, ��c � � ; i �2ac� �. .. .�.� �' ,;,,.t. S�:�s ' . . H uZ Mopeay� : ap I � � .._,._.. ..�_.�__.._.��a.v � i y� * , � ;"�' w c b j � � � p o � I o I t d t ....�� 'd�� E t � � � i L Y� io � n N ! v � 7 � J .. j f/� C N a tl �� S �U �� ` < • � c a m �''�a; k C1 aNi i � i0 f , . o � a � C t ! � ` , i . �, o � � '� � I V T � / � � £L �: .'�"' � ..,c._..� �.��t�t �; ----'�'1 0 L I �� . �+��' . � dd':O � T` I N U I � � i ;a .r �. = mmt s "s c � ' � � s a� 7 _ � � S � >c) ` �. „ '.. ,.. .�. o a��:r R.,t »;.. . :s;:-.��-�c�<:�::�`,��. .. . "'^t.. �'a• °"� i � ` 3 :.� ^ i � � U C� ..H i oe�j �� N Peoxssoi �'O y I U' �' � C9 � p � � w s:aviny„> p��Ye�� ,.� .� � � O � G y �' � b � '0 p� �� A.: � 3 1 . � �? 0�_ � y � 7 b M,' �a J.,.:� G I � r ` i Y J otf ^ j v�i O V '' �� x a o � i .t) .� . i ,Qq o o � . �, � H ng aaeZ � '�� o � � •fC j .o�' " z m t b j ri LL i � 03 c�o � � �� •� o Y k '� d s �;` C .-.-�xQ se�bnoQ..�„�� H s seibnoQ d(�_ � � � 7 7 - � � L V �� U ( . .�V� _ O � S�Y��.� � � . � �v�,k iPF+o13 :-; �� I � � O �o� �;;� gasy �' (� i 1 �„ C9 U otf �Fq,du�.� w W , � Q � 'a� d s i � a O angSas:aj �,-i I L � � I ..�. � . � V S d�.. A'.t S�Y ,! � � " o �t p,�V°asFsfn I � E 2`�=�e � � �d �t�o'° �'t i f� ! �Hangepena -. . p, : ap 0> �d � C .d+ j4 �� =� � / � O > w � A U aCt.o � i �i I �,�;�:. ._ ■ V J C) � tn �c�'" S aey :j O f �� Iaes�L� � � � c �'�`4' � a� aP�4�I '�c .. � � � y pueiK� q . � f .��; � � � � = d, �. , � V� H ang eK�auucM H ang ex�3aua;M = R r"i S�ay�papQliy ! � � � b ` �� .y� p z IS a�H '.�` ,�` � 0.S, o D uFsuo�s[M N ""` a� �° � '� � � x � � ; �a� i � P�IH gllfNi R+aaa� " � H ang auoog y�. � I �, • /... 'Ff� ... q4 I � H ang inle�aQ ¢f �h y I a -. i � � � � � .. �' , � ' � .. M ,.� ; V �P � Q '1 y, �� b �, �,` �, , 3 I ` R s i ,� ^ � R 1 . H any¢qoss�apaa� � �j � �m � . � . ... . l.—',ac�'�."*."or.. � -�•„ ..�-....�^�a..s, . . . . ..___.�.,�,.,._. �., . ;-�-- �,x, � -.---�a r � f.. ,+ �r i r 4� , �� ri �.��';. .. . ...