The URL can be used to link to this page

11-21-17 CC Agenda Packet (entire) AGENDA Regular Meeting of the City Council Golden Valley City Hall 7800 Golden Valley Road Council Chamber November 21, 2017 6:30 pm 1. CALL TO ORDER PAGES A. Pledge of Allegiance B. Roll Call 2. ADDITIONS AND CORRECTIONS TO AGENDA 3. CONSENT AGENDA Approval of Consent Agenda - All items listed under this heading are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no discussion of these items unless a Council Member so requests in which event the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda. A. Approval of Minutes: 1. City Council Meeting - November 8, 2017 3-6 2. Special City Council Meeting - November 14, 2017 7 B. Approval of City Check Register 8 C. Licenses: 1. Approve Liquor License - Brookview Golf Course 9 2. Gambling License Exemption and Waiver of Notice - Pheasants Forever 10-12 D. Minutes: 1. Special Planning Commission - October 9, 2017 13-14 2. Planning Commission - October 23, 2017 15-32 3. Open Space & Recreation Commission - July 24, 2017 33-34 4. Joint Water Commission - July 5 and September 6, 2017 35-38 5. Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission - September 21, 2017 39-46 E. Bids and Quotes: 1. Authorize contract for Wesley Park tennis courts & Wildwood Park Pickleball courts 47 2. Purchase One Bobcat 5600 and Maintenance Attachments for the new Brookview 48 F. Approval of Plat - Lions Park View 17-71 49-51 G. Receipt of October 2017 Financial Reports 52-64 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Public Hearing - Redevelopment Plan for Douglas Drive Redevelopment Project Area 65 B. Public Hearing - Amendment to the General Land Use Plan Map - 1111 Douglas Drive 66 C. Public Hearings - Approval of Conditional Use Permit and Amendments to the Official Zoning Map and the General Land Use Plan Map - 5508 Olson Memorial Highway 67 D. Public Hearings - Approval of a Major PUD Amendment and Amendments to the Official Zoning Map - 701 Lilac Drive North 68 E. Public Hearing - Establishing a Tax Increment Financing District - Tennant World Headquarters within the Douglas Drive Redevelopment Project Area 69 5. OLD BUSINESS 6. NEW BUSINESS A. Support Future Bus Rapid Transit Service on Highway 169 and Highway 55 in accordance with the Highway 169 Mobility Study 17-72 70-74 B. First Consideration - Ordinance #627 - Establishing a 2018 Master Fee Schedule 75-92 C. Review of Council Calendar D. Mayor and Council Communications 7. ADJOURNMENT UNOFFICIAL MINUTES CITY COUNCIL MEETING GOLDEN VALLEY, MINNESOTA November 8, 2017 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Pro Tem Schmidgall called the meeting to order at 6:30 pm. 1A. Pledge of Allegiance 1B. Roll Call Present: Mayor Pro Tem Steve Schmidgall, Council Members Joanie Clausen, Larry Fonnest, and Andy Snope. Also present were: City Manager Cruikshank and City Clerk Luedke. Absent: Mayor Shep Harris 1C. Presentation Receive Award for Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting Mayor Pro Tem Schmidgall introduced Finance Director Virnig, who presented the Council with the Award for Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting. Council thanked Finance Director Virnig for her service in finance. MOTION made by Council Member Clausen, seconded by Council Member Snope to receive the Award for Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting and the motion carried. 2. ADDITIONS AND CORRECTIONS TO AGENDA MOTION made by Council Member Fonnest, seconded by Council Member Clausen to amend the agenda of November 8, 2017, by replacing the Council/Manager minutes of September 12, 2017, with the correction to item 5 - Future of Bicycle and Pedestrian Task Force and the motion carried. 3. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA MOTION made by Council Member Snope, seconded by Council Member Fonnest to approve the consent agenda of November 8, 2017, as revised removal 3I-Acceptance of donation of a tree for Brookview Golf Course and the revised Council/ Manager meeting of September 12, 2017, and the motion carried. 3A1. Approve Minutes of the Council/Manager Meeting of September 12, 2017. 3A2. Approve Minutes of the City Council Meeting of October 3, 2017. 3A3. Approve Minutes of the City Council Meeting of October 17, 2017. 3B. Approve City Check Register and authorize the payment of the bills as submitted. 3C1. To authorize the issuance of the New/Used Vehicle Dealer licenses as recommended by staff. 3C2. To receive and file the gambling license exemption and approve the waiver of notice requirement for Good Shepherd Church. 3D. Accept for filing the Minutes of Boards and Commissions as follows: 1. Special Planning Commission - September 11, 2017 2. Planning Commission - September 11, 2017 3. Environmental Commission - September 25, 2017 3E1. Authorize approval and payment of the sprinkler system change order to Viking Sprinkler for the Brookview project in an amount of $32,288 and Phase III soil correction change order to Kevitt Construction for the Brookview project in an amount of $64,477.97. Unofficial City Council Minutes -2- November 8, 2017 3. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA - continued 3E2. Approve quotes from Municipal Emergency Services (MES) for the total purchase in the amount of $80,829.893. 3F. Adopt Resolution 17-68, Modifying 2017 General Wages and Salary to include the Position of Head Cook/Kitchen Supervisor and adopt Resolution 17-69, Amending the 2017 Brookview Golf Fund Budget. 3G. Approve the following Board and Commission appointments: Planning Commission Adam Brookins 2 year term - expires 5/19 Human Services Fund Toots Vodovoz 3 year term - expires 5/20 3H. Authorize the purchase and installation of playground equipment from GameTime, Inc. through Minnesota/Wisconsin Playground, Inc. and the U.S. Communities purchasing contract #416005190 for a project total of $71,704.38. 3I. Adopt Resolution 17-70, accepting Donation from the Jim Sanford Family for Brookview Golf Course Memorial Tree. 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA 3I. Acceptance of Donation of a Tree to Brookview Golf Course Council thanked the Jim Sanford Family for their donation to Brookview Golf Course. MOTION made by Council Member Clausen, seconded by Council Member Fonnest to adopt Resolution 17-70, accepting Donation from the Jim Sanford Family for a Brookview Golf Course Memorial Tree upon a vote being taken the following voted in favor of: Clausen, Fonnest, Schmidgall and Snope, the following was absent: Harris, the following voted against: none and the motion carried. 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS 5. OLD BUSINESS 6. NEW BUSINESS 6A. Cornerstone Creek PUD No. 124, Amendment #1 - 9280 Golden Valley Road - Cornerstone Creek Limited Partnership, Applicant Planning Manager Zimmerman presented the staff report and answered questions from Council. MOTION made by Council Member Fonnest, seconded by Council Member Snope to approve the plans for Cornerstone Creek PUD No. 124, Amendment #1 and the motion carried. 6B. Globus Golden Valley Addition PUD No. 112, Amendment #1 - 5200 Wayzata Boulevard - Global One Golden Valley, Applicant Planning Manager Zimmerman presented the staff report and answered questions from Council. Mr. Mark Globus, Managing Director of Global One Commercial, reviewed the proposed amendments including the design changes and exterior finishes being used on the building and answered questions from Council. Unofficial City Council Minutes -3- November 8, 2017 6B. Globus Golden Valley Addition PUD No. 112, Amendment #1 - continued MOTION made by Council Member Fonnest, seconded by Council Member Clausen to approve the plans for Globus Golden Valley Addition PUD No. 112, Amendment #1 and the motion carried. 6C. METRO Blue Line Extension Update Planning Manager Zimmerman presented the staff report and answered questions from Council. City Manager Cruikshank and Council Member Snope provided additional information regarding the funding of the project. MOTION made by Council Member Fonnest, seconded by Council Member Clausen to receive and file METRO Blue Line Extension Update and the motion carried. 6D. Reciprocal Agreement with the Cities of New Hope and Crystal for Resident Privileges at their Aquatic Facilities and the Brookview Indoor Play Area Director of Parks and recreation Birno presented the staff report and answered questions from Council. MOTION made by Council Member Snope, seconded by Council Member Clausen to authorize a City Manager to sign a Reciprocal Agreement, pending City Attorney review, with the City of New Hope and the City of Crystal and the motion carried. 6E. Review of Council Calendar Some Council Members may attend the DeCola Ponds Information Open House on November 9, 2017, from 5 to 7:30 pm in the Council Chambers. City Offices will be closed on November 10, 2017, in observance of Veteran’s Day. A Special City Council meeting will be held on November 14, 2017, at 6:15 pm to canvass the 2017 Elections Results. The next Council/Manager meeting will be held on November 14, 2017, at 6:30 pm. Some Council Members may attend the 2018 Street Rehabilitation Project Open House on November 15, 2017, from 4:30 to 6:30 pm in the Council Chambers. Some Council Members may attend a Media Training session on November 16, 2017, from 1 to 4:30 pm in the Council Conference Room. Some Council Member may attend a meet and greet with a Girl Scout troop from Meadowbrook Elementary School on November 21, 2017, at 6 pm in the Council Chambers. The next City Council meeting will be held on November 21, 2017, immediately following the HRA meeting. 6E. Mayor and Council Communication Mayor Pro Tem Schmidgall congratulated Ms. Rosenquist on her election to Council and Council Member Fonnest on his re-election. Unofficial City Council Minutes -4- November 8, 2017 6E. Mayor and Council Communication - continued Council Member Clausen thanked all of the candidates that ran this year and Council Member Fonnest thanked all of the residents who came out to vote this year. Council Member Snope reviewed the Hopkins School Board races and said the school district bonds had passed. He congratulated the School Board Members on their election. Council Member Clausen reminded residents that Brookview’s Grand opening is scheduled for December 1, 2017. 7. ADJOURNMENT MOTION made by Council Member Snope, seconded by Council Member Fonnest and the motion carried to adjourn the meeting at 7:12 pm. _______________________________ Steve Schmidgall, Mayor Pro Tem ATTEST: __________________________ Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk UNOFFICIAL MINUTES SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING GOLDEN VALLEY, MINNESOTA November 14, 2017 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Pro Tem Schmidgall called the meeting to order at 6:15 pm. 1A. Roll Call Present: Mayor Pro Tem Schmidgall, Council Members Clausen, Fonnest and Snope. Also present were: City Manager Cruikshank and Finance Director Virnig. Absent: Mayor Harris 2A. CANVASS 2017 ELECTION RESULTS Finance Director Virnig presented the election returns for the City Election held on November 7, 2017, and answered questions from the Council. MOTION made by Council Member Clausen, seconded by Council Member Snope to accept the submitted Hennepin County’s Election Abstract of Votes Cast in the Precincts of the City of Golden Valley and declare the Results from the Abstract to be the Official Results and the motion carried. 3. ADJOURMENT MOTION made by Council Member Clausen, seconded by Council Member Snope and the motion carried to adjourn the meeting at 6:23 pm. ____________________________ Steve Schmidgall, Mayor Pro Tem ATTEST: _________________________________ Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting November 21, 2017 Agenda Item 3. B. Approval of City Check Register Prepared By Sue Virnig, Finance Director Summary Approval of the check register for various vendor claims against the City of Golden Valley. Attachments • Document sent via email Recommended Action Motion to authorize the payment of the bills as submitted. Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting November 21, 2017 Agenda Item 3. C. 1. Approve On Sale and Sunday Sale Liquor License - City of Golden Valley d/b/a Brookview Golf Course Prepared By Kris Luedke, City Clerk Summary Brookview Golf Course has submitted an application for an On-Sale and Sunday Sale Liquor License. Because of the new Brookview building and per City Code Section 5.02, subdivision 5(C), no liquor license shall be transferable to a different location. If a liquor establishment enlarges, alters or extends the premises previously licensed, the license shall be considered a transfer to a different location, whereas a new, complete application for the license must be received by the City. The Golden Valley Police Department and City Attorney has reviewed the application, and has found the documents are in order and complete. The applicant meets all of the requirements for consideration of the issuance of an On-Sale and Sunday Sale Liquor License. Recommended Action Motion to approve the issuance of an On-Sale and Sunday Sale Liquor License to the City of Golden Valley d/b/a Brookview Golf Course, located at 200 Brookview Parkway, through June 30, 2018. Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting November 21, 2017 Agenda Item 3. C. 2. Gambling License Exemption and Waiver of Notice Requirement - Pheasants Forever Prepared By Kris Luedke, City Clerk Summary As per State Statute organizations that conduct gambling within the City limits have to submit an application for a lawful gambling permit to the State after the permit has been approved or denied by the City. Depending upon the timing of the permit the applicants may request the City to waive the 30-day waiting period. Attachments • Application for Exempt Permit (2 pages) Recommended Action Motion to receive and file a gambling license exemption and approve the waiver of notice requirement for Northwest Suburban Chapter of Pheasants Forever. MINNESOTA LAWFUL GAMBLING 9/17 LG220 Application for Exempt Permit Page 1 oft An exempt permit may be issued to a nonprofit Application Fee (non-refundable) organization that: Applications are processed in the order received. If the application • conducts lawful gambling on five or fewer days,and is postmarked or received 30 days or more before the event,the • awards less than$50,000 in prizes during a calendar year. application fee is$100; otherwise the fee is$150. If total raffle prize value for the calendar year will be Due to the high volume of exempt applications, payment of $1,500 or less, contact the Licensing Specialist assigned to additional fees prior to 30 days before your event will not expedite your county by calling 651-539-1900. service, nor are telephone requests for expedited service accepted. ORGANIZATION INFORMATION Organization Previous Gambling Name: Northwest Suburban Chapter of Pheasants Forever Permit Number: X-36487 Minnesota Tax ID Federal Employer ID Number, if any: 4874648 Number(FEIN), if any: 41-1429149 Mailing Address: 10015 Holloway Farms Road City: Greenfield State: MN Zip; 55357 County: Hennepin Name of Chief Executive Officer(CEO): Bruce Behm Daytime Phone: _ Email: (Permit will be emailed to this email address.) NONPROFIT STATUS Type of Nonprofit Organization (check one): QFraternal = Religious Veterans Q Other Nonprofit Organization Attach a copy of one of the following showing proof of nonprofit status: (DO NOT attach a sales tax exempt status or federal employer ID number,as they are not proof of nonprofit status.) ❑ A current calendar year Certificate of Good Standing Don't have a copy? Obtain this certificate from: MN Secretary of State, Business Services Division Secretary of State website, phone numbers: 60 Empire Drive,Suite 100 www.sos.state.mn.us St. Paul, MN 55103 651-296-2803,or toll free 1-877-551-6767 ❑ IRS income tax exemption(501(c))letter in your organization's name Don't have a copy? To obtain a copy of your federal income tax exempt letter, have an organization officer contact the IRS toll free at 1-877-829-5500. IRS-Affiliate of national,statewide,or international parent nonprofit organization (charter) If your organization falls under a parent organization,attach copies of both of the following: 1. IRS letter showing your parent organization is a nonprofit 501(c)organization with a group ruling,and 2. the charter or letter from your parent organization recognizing your organization as a subordinate. GAMBLING PREMISES INFORMATION Name of premises where the gambling event will be conducted (for raffles, list the site where the drawing will take place): Golden Valley Country Club Physical Address (do not use P.O. box): 7001 Golden Valley Road Check one: 0 City: Golden Valley Zip: 55427 County: Hennepin FlTownship: Zip: County: Date(s)of activity (for raffles, indicate the date of the drawing): February 10, 2018 Check each type of gambling activity that your organization will conduct: =Bingo =Paddlewheels =Pull-Tabs a Tipboards E-7111affle(total value of raffle prizes awarded for the calendar year,including this raffle: $20,500.00 ) Gambling equipment for bingo paper, bingo boards, raffle boards, paddlewheels, pull-tabs,and tipboards must be obtained from a distributor licensed by the Minnesota Gambling Control Board. EXCEPTION: Bingo hard cards and bingo ball selection devices may be borrowed from another organization authorized to conduct bingo. To find a licensed distributor,go to www.mn.gov/gcb and click on Distributors under List of Licensees,or call 651-539-1900. 9/17 LG220 Application for Exempt Permit Page 2 of 2 LOCAL UNIT OF GOVERNMENT ACKNOWLEDGMENT(required before submitting application to the Minnesota Gambling Control Board) CITY APPROVAL COUNTY APPROVAL for a gambling premises for a gambling premises located within city limits located in a township The application is acknowledged with no waiting period. he application is acknowledged with no waiting period. rThe application is acknowledged with a 30-day waiting he application is acknowledged with a 30-day waiting period,and allows the Board to issue a permit after 30 days period,and allows the Board to issue a permit after (60 days for a 1st class city). 30 days. F]The application ' de ie ❑The application is denied. Print City Name: C K G`Zf Print County Name: Signa of City erso ei: Signature of County Personnel: Title: Date: r Title: Date: TOWNSHIP(if required by the county) On behalf of the township, I acknowledge that the organization is applying for exempted gambling activity within the township The city or county must sign before limits. (A township has no statutory authority to approve or submitting application to the deny an application, per Minn. Statutes, section 349.213.) Gambling Control Board. Print Township Name: Signature of Township Officer: Title: Date: CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S SIGNATURE (required) The information provided in this application is complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge. I acknowledge that the financial report will be completed and returned to the Board within 30 days of the event date. -7 Chief Executive Officer's Signature: Date: Ie —�/ 93vv` e mus O's signature; designee may not sign) Print Name: Br k c ' REQUIREMENTS MAIL APPLICATION AND ATTACHMENTS Complete a separate application for: Mail application with: • all gambling conducted on two or more consecutive days,or a copy of your proof of nonprofit status,and • all gambling conducted on one day. application fee(non-refundable). If the application is Only one application is required if one or more raffle drawings are postmarked or received 30 days or more before the event, conducted on the same day. the application fee is$100; otherwise the fee is$150. Financial report to be completed within 30 days after the Make check payable to State of Minnesota. gambling activity is done: To: Minnesota Gambling Control Board A financial report form will be mailed with your permit. Complete 1711 West County Road B,Suite 300 South and return the financial report form to the Gambling Control Roseville, MN 55113 Board. Questions? Your organization must keep all exempt records and reports for Call the Licensing Section of the Gambling Control Board at 3-1/2 years(Minn. Statutes, section 349.166,subd. 2(f)). 651-539-1900. Data privacy notice: The information requested application. Your organization's name and ment of Public Safety;Attorney General; on this form(and any attachments)will be used address will be public information when received Commissioners of Administration,Minnesota by the Gambling Control Board(Board)to by the Board. All other information provided will Management&Budget,and Revenue; Legislative determine your organization's qualifications to be private data about your organization until the Auditor,national and international gambling be involved in lawful gambling activities in Board issues the permit, When the Board issues regulatory agencies;anyone pursuant to court Minnesota. Your organization has the right to the permit,all information provided will become order;other individuals and agencies specifically refuse to supply the information; however, if public. If the Board does not issue a permit,all authorized by state or federal law to have access your organization refuses to supply this information provided remains private,with the to the information; individuals and agencies for information,the Board may not be able to exception of your organization's name and which law or legal order authorizes a new use or determine your organization's qualifications and, address which will remain public. Private data sharing of information after this notice was as a consequence,may refuse to issue a permit. about your organization are available to Board given; and anyone with your written consent. If your organization supplies the information members,Board staff whose work requires requested,the Board will be able to process the access to the information;Minnesota's Depart- This form will be made available in alternative format(i.e. large print,braille)upon request. An equal opportunity employer Special Meeting of the Golden Valley Planning Commission October 9, 2017 A special meeting of the Planning Commission was held at the Golden Valley City Hall, Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota, on Monday, October 9, 2017. Chair Baker called the meeting to order at 7 pm. Those present were Planning Commissioners Baker, Black, Blenker, Blum, Johnson, Segelbaum, and Waldhauser. Also present were Planning Manager Jason Zimmerman and Associate Planner/Grant Writer Emily Goellner. 1. Comp Plan Work Session – Land Use Zimmerman introduced the revised land use categories and highlighted ways in which they were different from the current categories, including using “intensity” instead of “density” for the residential land uses. The Commissioners discussed how the zoning districts might be revised to align more closely with the new land use categories and some potential changes to the lists of permitted and conditional uses. Baker pointed out some parts of Theodore Wirth Park shown as Active Use and indicated they really should be classified as Passive Use. In addition, the proposed Park and Ride area near Golden Valley Road should be guided for Railroad use. Goellner commented on the Institutional categories and talked about how the new break down would better reflect impacts to surrounding properties. Zimmerman and Goellner described the Flexible Use category and talked about the possibility of creating two different scales of mixed use nodes: one for neighborhoods and one for regional attractions. Goellner said she would work to update the description of this category. Zimmerman reviewed the four Planning Districts that were being proposed for the Comprehensive Plan to help guide redevelopment. The Commissioners discussed the future of the Optum site. Baker indicated he would like to see future uses of the property include restaurants and commercial spaces. Segelbaum asked about assigning percentages of various uses to areas guided for Flexible Use and if that could be a way to prevent too much land converting to multi-family housing. Black asked if zoning designations could be specific under a Flexible Use scenario. Waldhauser said she supported more neighborhood scale nodes of mixed use and would like to see it incorporated into the land use plan where appropriate. Baker indicated he would not be supportive of reguiding parcels along Glenwood Ave south of Breck School to a new use until Breck was able to come to the City with a proposal for the entire area. The Commissioners discussed the opportunities to encourage commercial uses along Golden Valley Road near the new Hello apartment building. Special Meeting of the Golden Valley Planning Commission October 9, 2017 Page 2 The meeting was adjourned at 8:35 pm. ____________________________ __________________________ Ron Blum, Secretary Lisa Wittman, Administrative Assistant Regular Meeting of the Golden Valley Planning Commission October 23, 2017 A regular meeting of the Planning Commission was held at the Golden Valley City Hall, Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota, on Monday, October 23, 2017. Chair Baker called the meeting to order at 7:03 pm. Those present were Planning Commissioners Baker, Black, Blenker, Johnson, and Waldhauser. Also present were Physical Development Director Marc Nevinski, Planning Manager Jason Zimmerman, Associate Planner/Grant Writer Emily Goellner, and Administrative Assistant Lisa Wittman. Commissioners Blum and Segelbaum were absent. 1. Approval of Minutes September 11, 2017, Special Planning Commission Meeting MOVED by Waldhauser, seconded by Johnson and motion carried unanimously to approve the September 11, 2017, special meeting minutes as submitted. September 11, 2017, Regular Planning Commission Meeting MOVED by Blenker, seconded by Waldhauser and motion carried unanimously to approve the September 11, 2017, regular meeting minutes as submitted. 2. Informal Public Hearing – Major PUD Amendment – PU-114, Tennant Company, Amendment #2 Applicant: Oppidan, Inc. Address: 701 Lilac Drive North Purpose: To allow for an expansion of the PUD and the construction of a six story office building and a three story parking ramp. 3. Informal Public Hearing – Property Rezoning – PU-114 Tennant Company Applicant: Oppidan, Inc. Address: Various properties within amended PUD #114 Purpose: To rezone all the properties within the PUD to Industrial The Informal Public Hearings and discussion for Items 2 and 3 were combined. Zimmerman referred to a location map and gave an overview and some background information regarding Tennant Companies proposal to expand their campus by constructing a new six story office tower and a three story parking ramp. Tennant is also Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission October 23, 2017 Page 2 proposing to relocate the existing Damascus Way facility, preparing an outlot, and vacating their Corporate Woods office building for future redevelopment. Tennant is also asking for a TIF package from the City to help cover certain eligible costs. Zimmerman discussed the various zoning designations of the parcels located within the PUD and stated that staff is recommending that they all be rezoned to Industrial which allows office, warehouse, and manufacturing uses. Rezoning the properties to Industrial will also make them consistent with the General Land Use Map. Zimmerman discussed some of the key elements of the proposal including: acquisition of additional parcels in the northwest quadrant, demolition of seven structures, construction of a six story office tower near Highway 100, construction of a three story parking ramp internal to the site, a new main access drive connecting Zane Avenue with Lilac Drive, new pedestrian connections, a new stormwater management plan, significant tree removal and replacement, changes to the west loading dock area, and creation of an outlot for future development. Zimmerman referred to the building height requirements and stated that the Industrial zoning district allows buildings to be 45 feet tall. Tennant is proposing that the office building be approximately 107 feet tall and the parking ramp 34 feet tall. Zimmerman discussed the parking requirements and stated that based on the proposed uses Tennant is required to have 1,145 vehicle parking spaces and 58 bicycle parking spaces. Tennant is proposing to have 820 vehicle parking spaces and 42 bicycle parking spaces. Zimmerman stated that staff is requiring that the parking ramp be constructed to allow for future decks to be added in the future if necessary. Staff is also requiring proof of bicycle parking for 16 bicycle parking spaces. Zimmerman referred to a map of the site and discussed the site access for vehicles and pedestrians. He added that staff is interested in having further discussion about creating a connection to the Luce Line in the northeast corner of the site and a connection from the new Damascus Way to Zane Avenue. Zimmerman referred to the stormwater management plan and stated that there is minimal stormwater treatment on the site now. He explained that the applicant is proposing two ponds with piping to bring water to these ponds. He added that there is an infiltration area under the parking lot and that the bulk of the water would flow out to the northeast corner of the site. Zimmerman referred to the landscaping plan and explained that there are 711 trees on the site and that 463 of them are significant trees. The applicant is proposing to remove 504 trees; 323 of these are significant trees. The applicant is proposing to plant 502 new trees, 1,018 shrubs, and 7.3 acres of ground cover. Zimmerman stated that the floor plans, elevations, and materials are not yet available, but they will be reviewed by the Planning Commission and the City Council at future meetings. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission October 23, 2017 Page 3 Zimmerman stated that staff is recommending approval of the Major PUD Amendment and the rezoning of the properties within the PUD subject to the findings and conditions listed in the staff report. Johnson asked why Industrial is being proposed for the rezoning rather than another zoning district. Zimmerman stated that the 2020 and 2030 Comp Plans have these properties guided for Industrial uses. Also, Tennant’s vision for these properties is for manufacturing and office use which is consistent with the General Land Use Map. Zimmerman added that keeping Industrial uses in the City is also important because they hard to get back once they are gone. Waldhauser asked if the entire property needs to be zoned the same. Zimmerman said it does not and noted that there are other PUDs in the City that have different zoning designations within them. Black asked if a separate PUD amendment would be required if the applicant wanted to exceed the maximum height allowed for the parking ramp. Zimmerman stated that if the applicant needs to come back to add additional levels to the parking ramp a PUD amendment will be required. Baker asked why the applicant is proposing to split the PUD into three parcels instead of one. Zimmerman stated that the City is considering recommending that the property be split into four parcels. He stated that it has to do with the Tax Increment Financing (TIF) and capturing the existing value and what value is being added. He added that Outlot A is a separate parcel because the applicant may choose to develop it themselves or sell it to someone else. Waldhauser referred to the pedestrian access and asked about the connection from Zane Avenue to Lilac Drive. Zimmerman stated that staff is encouraging that connection to be made. Johnson asked if there is bicycle access to the Luce Line from Zane Avenue. Zimmerman said yes, there is an at-grade access in the northwest corner of the site and that staff is recommending a connection to the Luce Line trail in the northeast corner of the site as well. Baker said he understands that the applicant will be coming back to the City with elevations, floor plans, and materials and he hopes the applicant will consider the general aesthetics of the building, the type of lighting used, and if it will be bird friendly with non- reflective glass because this is a landmark for the City. He added that he knows the applicant is proposing silver LEED certification and he is wondering what it would take to make that a higher certification. Blenker stated that the applicant’s narrative states that they aren’t going to be getting LEED certification, but they will be doing the equivalent of it. Baker reiterated that he is interested in the applicant doing better than the bare minimum of LEED certification. Goellner stated that the proposal is an efficient use of the land and that there would be opportunities to gain points in the LEED system with building efficiency and stormwater management. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission October 23, 2017 Page 4 Blenker asked what approvals would still be coming before the City. She noted that some of the conditions are worded somewhat weakly especially the ones that say the City is requiring further discussion because that isn’t really requiring anything. Zimmerman stated that staff anticipates that building materials and the final building design will be submitted before the next Planning Commission meeting. He added that there are other approvals that will go before the City Council as well. Baker stated that the Planning Commission could change the conditions to state what they would like the City Council to require rather than saying items require further discussion. Johnson said he agrees with the comments made about LEED certification especially since one of the overwhelming comments they’ve heard from the public during the Comp Plan update process has been that people want the City to “be green” and environmentally friendly. He added that because TIF is involved in this proposal there is more of a public interest to consider. Blenker referred to the access and circulation plans and asked about the nearest transit stop. Zimmerman stated that there is a gap in the system right now and noted that there is a sidewalk on the west side of Zane Ave. and bus stop on Douglas Drive at Highway 55. Baker asked if there are other examples in the City where companies provide a shuttle service or connectors to public transportation. Zimmerman said there are none that he is aware of. He added that part of the light rail project is to explore circulators from the transit stations. Waldhauser said there must be some opportunity for communities and businesses to lobby transit agencies for service. Waldhauser asked if the City has seen any demonstration of shift overlaps and how that works with parking. Zimmerman stated that the applicant’s narrative explains how their shift overlapping affects parking. Waldhauser asked if there is parking allowed on Zane Avenue or on the frontage road. Zimmerman said he doesn’t believe parking is allowed on Zane Avenue or on the frontage road. Baker asked what would trigger the need to require the applicant to construct additional parking levels. Zimmerman said complaints from employees, visitors, and the Fire Department could trigger the need for additional parking. Baker said he would like to encourage public transit and the use of alternative transportation especially since PUDs are supposed to be a benefit to the City. Black asked how accurate the parking calculations would be if the method was applied to the applicant’s current facility. Zimmerman said it is hard to tell and added that Tennant knows better than the City about how many employees come and go which is why staff is requiring a backup plan. Blenker asked if it is common to require the parking ramp be constructed to accommodate additional levels. Zimmerman said the City has required this in other projects and stated that it is cheaper to plan for additional levels up front rather than trying to retrofit the parking ramp in the future. Waldhauser referred to the landscaping plan and asked for a summary of what is being planted. Zimmerman stated that the applicant’s landscape team can provide a summary. He added that the City Forester will also review the landscape plan. Baker asked why the trees are proposed to be removed on Outlot A now if it is being used for future development. Zimmerman said his understanding is that removing the trees on Outlot A has do with the stormwater flow, ponding, grading, and the topography of the lot. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission October 23, 2017 Page 5 Waldhauser asked if the Planning Commission will review any future proposals on Outlot A. Zimmerman said yes, the future development of Outlot A will require a PUD amendment. Blenker noted that the Engineering staff report has several conditions listed and several recommendations listed asked if those conditions and recommendations are part of the Planning staff report’s conditions. Zimmerman stated that there are some conditions in the Engineering staff report that they are requiring and other items are things they are recommending or suggesting further conversation. Baker asked how the remaining single family home retains access. Zimmerman said that an easement will be required for utilities and access to that house. Baker asked who owns the existing Damascus Way property and who will own and construct the new facility. Zimmerman explained that Damascus Way is independently owned now and that Tennant is working to construct their new building. New ownership would take over Damascus Way and Tennant would take ownership of the parcel they are vacating. Baker asked if access through the site is a public road and if public access would be limited. Zimmerman said it is a private road. Drew Johnson, Oppidan, Inc., referred to comments regarding LEED certification and stated that LEED is one many programs. He said they look more at the end result of what they are achieving and less so of the administrator they pay to follow their rules. He stated that they build to the standards set forth in the LEED program, but they don’t want to pay the administrative fees for the official certification. Baker asked how the standards are evaluated if there isn’t an objective standard to use. Chris Fischer, BWBR, added that LEED is just one way to get people down the path to saving energy and being more sustainable. He said ultimately Tennant is a company that dedicates itself to sustainability. He explained LEED standards have changed over the years and he would argue that a LEED Silver building built 10 years ago wouldn’t even be LEED certified today. He said they are looking at strategies for this building to be as thoughtful and energy conscience as possible. Baker asked the applicants if they have given any thought to passive solar use on the roof. Fischer said they are working on getting the energy footprint down for the whole building first and then they will look further at ways to use renewable energy strategies. Waldhauser asked if they are any opportunities for the manufacturing facility even though it isn’t being rebuilt. Drew Johnson said that is not a part of what they’ve been hired to do. Carlos Fernandez, Aune Fernandez Landscape Architects, stated that the biggest sustainability move Tennant has made to date is electing to build a parking ramp. He said the proposal calls for 40% open space which is a slight increase over what is there today and they are removing a lot of buildings that aren’t energy efficient. He stated that they can’t forget that this is a manufacturing and industrial use which isn’t necessarily a safe environment with a lot of trucks and equipment coming in and out. He stated that they are not proposing limiting access but there are safety and privacy issues and a lot of the Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission October 23, 2017 Page 6 changes Tennant is making are addressing the safety of pedestrians, employees, and visitors to the site. Drew Johnson stated that they are still working through the Luce Line trail connection issues. He said he would like clarification on the condition regarding the additional levels on the parking ramp if needed in the future. He said the condition is vague about whether the City could make Tennant build the additional levels or if Tennant can decide if and when the additional levels are needed. Fernandez added that Tennant is fully committed and aware of their parking needs. Fernandez reviewed the grading and topography of the site and said they will have to move a significant amount of earth to Outlot A in order to be efficient and minimize export of dirt. Baker said he is concerned about removing a huge number of trees on Outlot A just for the convenience of not having to haul fill off site. Fernandez stated that most of the tree removals are happening in places where the building and ramp will be built. Waldhauser asked if Outlot A will have to be cut down later when it is developed. Fernandez said yes. Waldhauser asked where the manufacturing facility would be expanded if needed. Fernandez said there are no plans to do that. Drew Johnson said the administration employees in the plant could move to the new office building so there is some flexibility. Ben Ford, Rehder Associates, referred to the stormwater plan and said the goal is to reduce impacts to the site. He said there will be infiltration under the proposed parking lot and they are also proposing a pipe to take stormwater around the building to the east and off to the northeast corner of the site. Baker asked if water will be retained on site. Ford said they are providing a significant stormwater management system that doesn’t exist now. He explained that they are providing pre-treatment in the two ponds they are proposing and infiltration that reduces the volume of water leaving the site. Andy Johnson asked what he should say to people when they ask why all the trees are being removed on Outlot A when nothing is being built there. Ford stated that it is really because of the grading and topography of the site and explained that there will also be a retention pond on Outlot A. Waldhauser asked how the water retention under the parking lot will work. Ford stated that there will be tank with a permeable bottom under the parking lot that infiltrates water into the ground. Baker opened the public hearing. Stacy Hoschka, 6848 Knoll Street North, said she works as a water resource engineer and is a commissioner on the Bassett Creek Watershed Commission. She stated that she knows there are rate, quality, and volume standards that are required. She said because Golden Valley is a developed community, there is limited opportunity to address water quality issues and flooding issues so any time there is redevelopment it is important to go above and beyond what is required. She asked if there is contamination on the site and Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission October 23, 2017 Page 7 what studies have been done to look at the soils on the site. She referred to the proposed pond on Outlot A and asked if the design includes any portion of the proposed development in terms of rate control and water quality and what types of easements will be placed on Outlot A. She said a big issue in the metro area is chloride contamination and that is something the Bassett Creek Watershed Commission considers when reviewing proposals. She said when infiltration basins are beneath parking areas that is a source for chloride contamination into the groundwater and she is concerned about tasting salt in the drinking water so she would like to see a winter maintenance plan and a chloride management plan. She said another concern is that a level three sex offender moved into Damascus Way several years ago and she is curious about the security and connecting Damascus Way Tennant and Damascus Way to bike trails and sidewalks. She asked if there will be more people moving into Damascus Way. Seeing and hearing no one else wishing to comment, Baker closed the public hearing. Waldhauser stated that it would be nice to hear from the applicant about chloride contamination. Baker noted that a snow removal plan is required. Drew Johnson stated that they have performed a Phase I environmental assessment limited to the area of work and the soil borings did not have any elevated levels of anything that would require treatment. Waldhauser asked if testing for chloride is required. Drew Johnson said he didn’t know if chloride was one of things tested or not. Baker asked if the Bassett Creek Watershed Commission will review this proposal. Ford said yes, their proposal will go to the watershed commission. He added that the water from the parking lot will be taken to the pond first for pre-treatment. Black asked about the net impact in water quality with this proposal. Ford said there will be a net increase in the water quality. Baker said he would like to add language to condition number four about the Luce Line trail connection in the northeast corner of the site. Waldhauser noted that Tennant may not want the Luce Line connected directly to their site and suggested connecting the Luce Line to the frontage road instead. Black stated that the Luce Line connection would almost entirely benefit Tennant so he is not sure if the City should focus on something that doesn’t benefit the City as a whole. Andy Johnson stated there is public money going into this proposal. Baker also reiterated that PUDs are supposed to provide a benefit to the City. Zimmerman stated that language regarding the sidewalk connection to Zane Avenue from page seven of the Engineering staff report could be added to the conditions of approval. Baker said he would also like a condition added that encourages public transit use and he would like to hear specifics on how the applicant is achieving sustainability. Waldhauser stated that language regarding efforts to achieve or maximize sustainability could be added to condition number three. Andy Johnson said he would like it to be clear how the proposal is deviating from LEED requirements. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission October 23, 2017 Page 8 Blenker referred to language on page 13 of the Engineering staff report regarding preserving, enhancing and re-establishing woodland area and suggested that be added as a condition because there would be an opportunity to preserve and enhance the southwest part of the property. MOVED by Johnson, seconded by Blenker and motion carried unanimously to recommend approval of the Major PUD Amendment plan for Tennant Companies PUD No. 114, subject to the following findings and conditions: Findings: 1. The PUD amendment is tailored to the specific characteristics of the site in that it utilizes a prominent location for a high profile office tower, creates an internal main drive that provides access to parking for employees and visitors, and reorganizes uses on the site to maximize both functionality and redevelopment opportunities. In addition, the appearance of the area would be enhanced through modern site design and with quality materials and architecture. 2. Although the PUD amendment would result in the removal of a number of existing trees, it attempts to mitigate these removals through tree replacement, high quality landscaping, and the demolition of existing structures that would be replaced with open space. Stormwater treatment would be added to an area in which it is currently lacking, thereby improving water quality in the Sweeney Lake sub-watershed. 3. The proposed amendment would utilize land efficiently by consolidating operations onto one campus and removing blighted or underutilized properties. Additional future redevelopment opportunities would be created as a result of these efforts, allowing for continued growth of the City’s tax base. 4. The uses being proposed are consistent with the current uses on the site and others in the surrounding industrial area; consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan which calls for the preservation and expansion of facilities housing major employers; consistent with other redevelopment goals of the City such as the revitalization of the Douglas Drive Corridor; and would help bring order to an area that is currently a mix of uses and zoning designations and that lacks cohesion. 5. The PUD amendment would improve general health by providing water quality improvements to the Sweeney Lake sub-watershed, would improve safety by reducing the number of access points and improving the flow of truck movements on Zane Avenue, and would improve the general welfare by removing blighted properties and providing opportunities for tax base growth, and is therefore consistent with preserving and improving the general health, safety, and general welfare of the people of the City. 6. The creativity and flexibility provided under the PUD section of the Zoning Code allows for the assembly and development of land to form larger parcels, quality site planning, greater compatibility between land uses, and better coordination between the various elements of the site. The PUD amendment meets the Intent and Purpose provision of the City Code. Conditions: 1. The plans for the Tennant Headquarters Project submitted October 9, 2017, shall become a part of this approval. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission October 23, 2017 Page 9 2. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Engineering Division, dated October 17, 2017, shall become a part of this approval. 3. Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit, the applicant shall provide the Planning Commission and the City Council with final plans for review and approval showing revised floor plans, elevations, and materials for both the office building and the parking ramp, including elements of energy efficiency and sustainability, as well as any proposed signage. 4. As noted in the memo from the Engineering Division, a new sidewalk connection shall be required between Zane Avenue and the relocated Damascus Way facility along the north side of the Highway 55 frontage road. 5. A connection shall be required to the Luce Line Regional Trail in the northeast portion of the Tennant campus, as described in the memo from the Engineering Division, in order to serve Tennant employees, the public, and City maintenance staff that need to access, inspect, and maintain the retaining wall and utilities in the area. 6. As noted in the memo from the Engineering Division, an extension of the proposed sidewalk along the new campus roadway to the west to Zane Avenue shall be added to connect to the future bike and pedestrian facilities on Zane. 7. Modifications to the pedestrian routes throughout the parking lot shall be made in consultation with staff in order to improve pedestrian connections prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. 8. Clarification regarding the intended redesign of Plant One’s sprinkler system and the water mains feeding it shall be provided to the Fire Department for review and approval prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. 9. An additional hydrant shall be added on the southwest side of the new office tower in order to serve the needs of both the office building and the parking structure. 10. Adjustments to the lighting plan in order to bring the parking lot and parking ramp into conformance with the standards of the Zoning Code shall be submitted for review and approval by staff prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. 11. The parking ramp shall be designed and built to accommodate the construction of future additional levels of parking if persistent parking shortages are found to be a concern by the City Manager or his/her designee and/or if needed to accommodate parking spaces required by future phases of development on Outlot A. 12. Public bicycle racks or similar facilities for the parking/storage of a minimum of 42 bicycles shall be provided with proof of parking for an additional 16 bicycles, based on a calculation of 5% of the 1,145 parking spaces required for the site. The applicant shall work with staff to appropriately locate the bicycle facilities. 13. As noted in the memo from the Engineering Division, woodland areas that are planned to remain, including those in the southwest and west central portions of the site, shall be preserved, enhanced, and re-stablished through the addition of new trees to promote forest regeneration. 14. A snow storage/removal plan shall be submitted to and approved by staff prior to issuance of a Building Permit. 15. Modifications to the Preliminary Plat, as noted in the memo from the Engineering Division and mentioned above, shall be made and resubmitted to the City before approval of the Final Plat. 16. An easement establishing access to 5806 Olson Memorial Highway shall be drafted and recorded with the Final Plat as noted in the memo from the Engineering Division. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission October 23, 2017 Page 10 17. A park dedication fee of 6% of the estimated land value shall be paid before release of the Final Plat. 18. An additional PUD Amendment shall be submitted to and approved by the City prior to any additional phase of development on Outlot A. 19. All signage must meet the requirements of the City’s Sign Code. 20. This approval is subject to all other state, federal, and local ordinances, regulations, or laws with authority over this development. MOVED by Blenker, seconded Johnson and motion carried unanimously to recommend approval of rezoning the properties within Tennant Companies PUD #114 from various zoning districts to Industrial 4. Informal Public Hearing – General Land Use Plan Map Amendment – Damascus Way – 5808 Olson Memorial Highway – CPAM-67 Applicant: Oppidan, Inc. Address: 5508 Olson Memorial Highway Purpose: To change the designation on the General Land Use Plan Map from Industrial to Medium-High Density 5. Informal Public Hearing – Property Rezoning – 5808 Olson Memorial Highway – Damascus Way – ZO12-23 Applicant: Oppidan, Inc. Address: 5808 Olson Memorial Highway Purpose: To rezone the property from R-1 Single Family Residential to R-3 Medium Density Residential 6. Informal Public Hearing – Conditional Use Permit – 5808 Olson Memorial Highway – Damascus Way – CU-159 Applicant: Oppidan, Inc. Address: 5808 Olson Memorial Highway Purpose: To allow for a Residential Facility serving up to 30 clients The Informal Public Hearings and discussion for Items 4, 5 and 6 were combined. Goellner referred to a site plan and explained the applicant’s request to move the existing Damascus Way facility to a new location approximately 200 feet to the west. She stated that the existing Damascus Way facility has been at the same location since 1977. Currently, the 2030 Comp Plan guides both the existing property and the new property Industrial and the Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission October 23, 2017 Page 11 zoning designations on the existing properties are Institutional and R-1 Single Family Residential. The proposed new Comp Plan designation for the existing property is Industrial and for the new location Medium-High Density. The proposed zoning designation for the existing property is Industrial and for the new property it is R-3 Medium Density Residential. Goellner discussed the site characteristics of the proposed new location and stated that the property will be 32,240 square feet in size and will be accessible from Olson Memorial Highway. The new location is also near the proposed Zane Avenue bike lanes and sidewalks, the Luce Line trail, and bus routes on Highway 55, Douglas Drive, and Golden Valley Road. Goellner explained that the existing location doesn’t have a Conditional Use Permit because one wasn’t required by Code when Damascus Way first opened. She stated that the new facility requires a Conditional Use Permit to operate a 24-hour residential facility serving up to 30 individuals. Goellner explained that the facility will be licensed by Hennepin County and the State of Minnesota and will have a shared kitchen and dining facilities, a group activity room, and offices for staff. There will be one employee on site at all times and three to five employees on site during regular business hours. Goellner stated that the Zoning Code requires six parking spaces and that the applicant is proposing to have 15 parking spaces. Goellner referred to the comment regarding sex offenders and noted that the police and the courts don’t have authority to decide where an offender can live but they do have to register their home address. She added that Damascus Way doesn’t focus on this type of clientele, but rather on individuals who have been released from corrections in general. Goellner stated that staff is recommending approval of the Conditional Use Permit. Staff is also recommending approval of amending the General Land Use Plan Map to guide the new property Medium-High Density Residential use and rezoning the property to Medium Density. Baker asked if there have been any complaints about the existing Damascus Way facility. Goellner said no. Blenker asked if a Conditional Use Permit would be required if the facility moved but retained the same number of clients. Goellner said a Conditional Use Permit is required only if this facility is serving more than 25 individuals on a property zoned R-3. Baker asked how the size of this facility compares with other similar facilities elsewhere in the state. Goellner said she doesn’t know how it compares to others in the state but that there are other residential facilities in Golden Valley that are larger than this. Craig Fruen, Executive Director, Damascus Way, stated that they are the smallest facility of this type in the Twin Cities area. Baker asked about the proportion of level three sex offenders. Fruen stated that a level three sex offender lived at their facility for approximately nine months in 2013 and that he Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission October 23, 2017 Page 12 doesn’t live there anymore. He stated that their facility no longer accepts level three sex offenders. Johnson referred to the staff report where it states that the new Damascus Way building will be a safer and more secure building designed with institutional safeguards and asked what that means. Carl Nelson, President of Damascus Way, stated that their facility is staffed 24 hours a day, seven days a week and that the building has video monitoring and alarms. He stated that part of the programming is accountability and that they know when residents are on site and their activities. He explained that a resident’s transition plan includes obtaining a job and locating his next housing. Fruen added that Damascus Way is a halfway house and is designed to be a buffer to the community and to help keep the community safe by providing the residents a place to live. Blenker asked about the typical amount of time someone stays at the facility. Fruen said 2 to 8 months depending on the client. Baker opened the public hearing. Seeing and hearing no one wishing to comment, Baker closed the public hearing. Blenker questioned if changing the Comp Plan designation and zoning would be considered if this facility weren’t already there. She noted that if Damascus Way wasn’t located where it is the City would probably zone the property Industrial. She asked about the implications of rezoning the property to R-3 Residential. Goellner stated that this is a unique situation and circumstance and that the proximity of the existing facility is a big factor in this case. Blenker asked if the use would be allowed in the Industrial Zoning District. Goellner said no. Waldhauser stated that keeping this facility in this area has a stronger case than a new and different facility coming into an industrial area. Blenker stated that society produces these types of individuals and that there has to be a way to help people get back into society and this seems like a non-threatening way to do that. Baker agreed and stated that by encouraging this facility in this location the City is doing its part to help these individuals. MOVED by Blenker, seconded by Johnson and motion carried unanimously to recommend approval of changing the designation of 5808 Olson Memorial Highway on the General Land Use Map from Industrial to Medium-High Residential. MOVED by Blenker, seconded by Waldhauser and motion carried unanimously to recommend approval of rezoning the property at 5808 Olson Memorial Highway from R-1 Single Family Residential to R-3 Medium Density Residential. MOVED by Blenker, seconded by Waldhauser and motion carried unanimously to recommend approval of Conditional Use Permit #159 subject to the following findings and conditions: Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission October 23, 2017 Page 13 Findings: 1. This facility is a unique housing type in the City and there is demonstrated need for this type of facility. The applicant has indicated that there is more demand than capacity at the existing facility, which serves up to 18 individuals. The proposed facility would serve up to 30 individuals. 2. The proposed residential facility use is consistent with the General Land Use Plan Map and the Comprehensive Plan. The Housing Chapter of the Comprehensive Plan states that a variety of housing types and designs should be provided in order to allow for greater housing choices for Golden Valley residents. 3. There is no evidence to support an argument that property values would be either positively or negatively affected by the presence of a residential facility in this location. Assessing staff anticipates that there will be no effect as long as the property is well maintained. 4. The number of trips associated with the proposed use will not generate any negative traffic impacts to the surrounding areas. However, deliveries to the property should be made off-street whenever possible to mitigate short-term congestion. 5. The proposal will increase the population at the location as compared to the previous use. This is not expected to have a negative impact. 6. This use is expected to generate the same level of noise as any medium density residential building occupied by residents. 7. The proposed use is not anticipated to cause an increase in dust, odor, or vibrations. 8. The proposed use is not anticipated to attract pests. 9. The proposed building and parking area would have minimal visual impact and would be consistent with other properties in the area. 10. Staff does not anticipate any other negative effects of the proposed use. The use is expected to make a positive impact on new residents of the facility. These residents are re-entering the community after life-changing events and will receive 24-hour care. Conditions: 1. The facility may serve up to 30 persons and must maintain required licensure from the State of Minnesota and Hennepin County at all times. 2. Site plans and building plans must meet all requirements in the Golden Valley City Code, including but not limited to building height and setbacks, building coverage, impervious surface, outdoor lighting, fencing, signage, and screening. Requirements must be met at all times and all final site and building plans must be approved prior to the issuance of a Building Permit and a Certificate of Occupancy. 3. A Conditional Use Permit Amendment application must be filed by the applicant if any significant changes are made to this proposal, or if any of the conditions of this approval can no longer be met, or if the City Manager or his/her designee identifies changes to the plan or building that impact the findings and recommendations made in this memorandum. 4. A sidewalk design acceptable to the City Manager or his/her designee must be included in final approved site plans and the applicant or property owner must construct the sidewalk. 5. Trash and recycling receptacles as well as rooftop equipment must be screened from view. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission October 23, 2017 Page 14 6. This approval is subject to all other state, federal, and local ordinances, regulations, or laws with authority over this development. 7. Informal Public Hearing – General Land Use Plan Map Amendment – Corporate Woods – PUD #22 – 1111 Douglas Drive – CPAM-64 Applicant: Oppidan, Inc. Address: 1111 Douglas Drive Purpose: To change the designation on the General Land Use Plan Map from Commercial-Office to Mixed Use Zimmerman referred to a site plan and explained that upon completion of the Tennant World Headquarters this property will be vacated. The property is surrounded by higher density residential, office, and industrial uses along with single family residential north of Golden Valley Road. Zimmerman referred to the Douglas Drive Corridor study and stated that it calls for Mixed Use nodes along Douglas Drive as redevelopment occurs, and the draft 2040 Comp Plan anticipates mixed use so staff is recommending reguiding this property from Commercial- Office to Mixed Use. He added that the property also needs to be reguided now in order to be in conformance with the proposed TIF Plan. Zimmerman explained that the property is currently zoned Business and Professional Offices and that would need to be modified in the future to be consistent with the new land use. Also, the existing PUD would need to be rescinded once Tennant has vacated the site. Baker asked if this proposal would constrain what is done with the Optum site and questioned combining this site and the Optum site. Zimmerman said it shouldn’t conflict with the Optum site. Waldhauser asked how TIF on this site affects the other Tennant site. Zimmerman stated that the increase in value on both sites will be utilized in the TIF plan. Blenker asked how changing the land use impacts the current PUD. Zimmerman said it doesn’t have an impact yet, it is taking steps toward when the site is vacated and guiding the land use plan toward mixed use. Johnson questioned why the proposal is to reguide the property to Mixed Use because the TIF plan says the property will be used for multi-family residential development. Zimmerman said some multi-family residential development is anticipated along with other uses. Baker opened the public hearing. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission October 23, 2017 Page 15 Patricia Burrets, 6414 Golden Valley Road, asked what mixed use means and what would be allowed on this property. She said a new driveway was installed on this property directly across from her driveway and asked if that was built at the expense of Golden Valley or Hennepin County. She said she would like to know if a gas station and convenience store could be built and what the City visualizes for this property. She asked how large a footprint there could be for a new development compared to what is there now, what kind of buffer will there be, and what type of lighting there will be. She said she can’t imagine after spending millions of dollars in this corridor that there will be anything like a gas station or convenience store in this location because it is simply not appropriate. She referred to the staff report where it states potential changes have been considered and asked why. She asked how the Douglas Drive Corridor Study done in 2009 is applicable today. She stated that senior housing would be appropriate and that the property should be medium or high density residential, not mixed use. Seeing and hearing no one else wishing to comment, Baker closed the public hearing. Zimmerman stated that mixed use is a mix of uses including residential, commercial, institutional, and office and is intended to be along corridors where there is a level of density to support transit. He stated that the Douglas Drive Corridor Study was done in anticipation of redevelopment of Douglas Drive and the City planned for land uses that would be supportive of the investment being made in the roadway. He explained that the Study pointed out areas where mixed use nodes could be used and the 2040 Comp Plan update will look at places along this corridor where mixed use makes sense. He agreed that a gas station or convenience store probably won’t work at this site, but that some sort of senior housing and other uses would most likely work. He stated that there are no proposals submitted yet for this site. At this point the City is just saying it envisions some sort of mixed use here in the future. Baker explained that this property among others that have the potential to be redeveloped will be considered during the Comp Plan update process and encouraged people to participate in the process. Baker questioned who paid for the driveway that Ms. Burrets spoke about. Zimmerman said he is not sure if it was part of the Douglas Drive reconstruction, but that he would find out. MOVED by Blenker, seconded by Johnson and motion carried unanimously to recommend approval of changing the designation of 1111 Douglas Drive North on the General Land Use Map from Commercial-Office to Mixed Use. 7. Consideration of Resolution 17-01 Finding that Modifications to the Redevelopment Plan for the Douglas Drive Corridor Redevelopment Project Area and the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District Tennant World Headquarters Conform to the General Plan for the Development and Redevelopment of the City, as Amended (Amended 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update) Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission October 23, 2017 Page 16 Nevinski stated that the resolution before the Planning Commission does two things. It modifies the Douglas Drive Corridor Redevelopment Project Area and approves the TIF plan for the Tennant World Headquarters. Nevinski explained that the project area locations that have been designated are where the HRA can invoke their powers including: planning, programs like Section 8, real estate activities like assembling land or contamination clean-up, and financing. He explained the project area in this case was established approximately 10 years ago and it established goals for redevelopment and reinvestment in the Douglas Drive Corridor. He stated that as the City began discussions with Tennant there was talk about the need to include Tennant in a redevelopment area so it made sense to modify the Douglas Drive redevelopment area to include the Tennant properties and the area to the west of Tennant and Douglas Drive. Nevinski stated that the goals for area A-4 include opportunities for housing and commercial uses, and preserving industrial uses and employment in manufacturing, research and development, and office. The goals for area A-5 retain and enhance industrial and commercial activities including employment, office, and services/amenities. Johnson asked when the redevelopment plan was created. Nevinski stated it was created in 2009. Waldhauser asked how much discussion there has been on the Optum site. Nevinski said staff has talked with several developers about that site. Some want to reuse the site, and some want to redevelop the site so there has been some interest. Baker asked if there has been interest in creating a mixed use development, or if there is opportunity to influence the type of development on this site. Nevinski said there have been some inquiries about mixed use developments and that the City can try to influence development on this site with thoughtful planning. Johnson asked if the existing redevelopment plan has been brought up during discussions about the 2040 Comp Plan update. He said this is an important part of planning and he is wondering how to make this successful because he doesn’t remember this plan being a part of any discussions about the Comp Plan so far. Baker asked if there is an opportunity to revise the Douglas Drive Area Redevelopment Plan. Nevinski stated that the existing land use section of the Comp Plan calls out the Douglas Drive Corridor as one of the City’s redevelopment areas. He said the Douglas Drive Redevelopment Plan is more of visionary, high level document that is specific to the HRA and the HRA’s powers and is a process that needs to be followed by the HRA so it can act in its capacity. Waldhauser noted that the redevelopment plan calls out incorporating some retail uses in this area. She said she would strongly encourage amenities for employees and the community. Nevinski stated that Tennant has requested TIF to assist with redevelopment of their corporate campus. He explained that TIF is the increase in tax value between the existing Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission October 23, 2017 Page 17 and new use. The increased value can be used for eligible costs which can include funds for site assembly, demolition, soil correction, and utilities. Nevinski explained that the TIF district is proposed to be a 25 year pay-as-you-go, redevelopment district and that the City has agreed to $6.8 million to help fund Tennant’s site improvements. The City will be using $1.6 million to fund Zane Avenue reconstruction, and $1 million for use at the Corporate Woods site. Blenker asked how the sale of the Corporate Woods site would the impact TIF plan. Nevinski said the ownership does not impact the TIF district. Nevinski stated that the role of the Planning Commission is to consider whether the Project Area Plan and the TIF District Plan conform to the general (Comprehensive) plan of the City as a whole, they are compatible with the City’s regulations, and they encourage efficient use of infrastructure. Baker said he always thought TIF was designed to accomplish things the City could not otherwise accomplish. He questioned why TIF is being brought to the table and what the incentive is to the City if Tennant wants to create their corporate headquarters here. Nevinski said ultimately the decision lies with the City Council, but Tennant has options to locate in other areas where it might be easier to develop, but they’d like to be in Golden Valley and the site has some challenges. He stated that many times the City won’t use TIF, but it is an appropriate tool in this situation. Johnson noted that the TIF plan states that Area 4 will be used for multi-family development, but the request is to guide it for mixed use. Nevinski stated that there have been discussions about having a residential use on the Corporate Woods site and that there are also opportunities to do a unique mix of uses on that site as well. Johnson questioned if the City needs more housing. Zimmerman stated that the City does need additional senior housing. MOVED by Blenker, seconded by Waldhauser and motion carried 3 to 1 to adopt resolution 17-01 Finding that Modifications to the Redevelopment Plan for the Douglas Drive Corridor Redevelopment Project Area and the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District Tennant World Headquarters Conform to the General Plan for the Development and Redevelopment of the City, as Amended (Amended 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update). Commissioner Johnson voted no. --Short Recess-- 9. Reports on Meetings of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority, City Council, Board of Zoning Appeals and other Meetings Zimmerman gave an update on the Bottineau Light Rail project. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission October 23, 2017 Page 18 10. Other Business • Council Liaison Report No report was given. 11. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 10:59 pm. ____________________________ __________________________ Ron Blum, Secretary Lisa Wittman, Administrative Assistant GOLDEN VALLEY OPEN SPACE & RECREATION COMMISSION Meeting Minutes July 24, 2017 1. Call to Order Cornelius called the meeting to order at 7 pm. 2. Roll Call Present: Commissioners: John Cornelius, Kelly Kuebelbeck, Bob Mattison, Gillian Rosenquist, and Dawn Speltz. Staff: Rick Birno, Director of Parks and Recreation; John Crelly, Fire Chief; and Sheila Van Sloun, Parks and Recreation Administrative Assistant. Absent: Roger Bergman, Andy Bukowski, Cindy Carow-Schiebe, and Kimberly Sanberg. 3. Agenda Changes or Additions Rosenquist added an update on Mark Saunders. 4. Approval of Minutes – June 26, 2017 Cornelius changed the start time from 6:30 pm to 6 pm. MOTION: Moved by Rosenquist and seconded by Mattison to approve the June 26, 2017 meeting minutes as amended. Motion carried unanimously. 5. Appoint Representative to Brookview Rotational Art Selection Committee Birno explained that four members are needed for the committee, which will meet twice a year to select artists to display rotational art work at the new Brookiview. Commission member Kuebelbeck offered to represent the Open Space and Recreation Commission on the committee. MOTION: Moved by Mattison and seconded by Cornelius to nominate Kuebelbeck for the Rotational Art Selection Committee. Motion carried unanimously. 6. Scheid Park Fire Station Discussion Crelly explained the proposed new staffing and facility model for the Golden Valley Fire Department. The model includes a potential new east facility with a proposed location of the eastern side of Scheid Park. Birno explained the proposal may potentially include acquiring new parkland somewhere else in Golden Valley. Discussion then focused on how the new facility would improve fire department staffing and facility efficiency. He mentioned it would also create an opportunity to improve traffic and intersections in that area. Discussion also focused on concerns regarding safety and traffic and the opportunity to improve amenities at Scheid with the new facility. Key concerns and opportunities: Concerns: - Eliminating green space at Scheid Park - Many residents feel strongly this is the only community park east of Highway 100 - Would like to see the fire station moved as far to the east in the park as possible. Consider closing the road on the east side of the park and purchasing the house on triangle parcel to utilize for the new station proposal. - Traffic - Turning from Golden Valley Road into and out of the park - Losing the park’s identity - Pedestrians crossing Golden Valley Road from the north - Pedestrian walkway should be maintained on north side of park - Options for the pedestrian bridge - Loss of small ball field - Having an effective communication plan with community input - Losing existing park amenities Open Space & Recreation Commission Minutes July 24, 2017 Page 2 Opportunities: - Improve park design - Add appropriate parking - Replace deteriorating tennis courts - Realign skating areas - Improve east ball field, possibly add a permanent fence. - Share park with Fire Department - Better utilization of property - Community meeting rooms available at new fire station - Access to restrooms seven days a week 7. Commission and Staff Updates • Commission Updates - Rosenquist announced the passing of Mark Saunders. She said given his involvement with the new Brookview construction, she would like to incorporate some kind of acknowledgement as part of the new facility. - Cornelius proposed the Commission meetings begin at 6:30 pm. Commissioners agreed. - Birno reminded the Commission there is no meeting in August, and the September meeting is a golf course tour. - Kuebelbeck expressed concerns with traffic and pedestrians at the intersection of Winnetka and Duluth. Birno will provide contact for review. - Speltz said she would like the city to explore the idea of having two permanent hockey rinks at one park. She suggested Wesley or Gearty. Birno will send an estimate for the addition of an outdoor hockey rink. • Brookview Exit Schedule and Demolition – Birno gave the Commission the proposed timeline for the final few months of Brookview construction. He also said the Brookview Garage Sale will be held in the old Brookview building on Monday, September 25 from 10 am-2:30 pm. • Brookivew Grand Opening – Birno said the Grand Opening will be held on Friday, December 1 at 6 pm, with a VIP night being held on Thursday, November 30. • Schaper Park Grand Opening – Birno said the Schaper Park Grand Opening will be held on Saturday, September 9 from 11:30 am-1 pm to celebrate the new challenge course and all- inclusive play structure. It’s free and open to all. • St. Croix Park Grand Opening – Birno said the St. Croix Park Grand Opening will be held on Monday, September 18 at 2 pm to celebrate the new play structure and children’s little library. It’s free and open to all. • Artist Susan Armington - Brookview – Birno said Susan Armington has been selected to create an original art work for the lobby in the new Brookview. He mentioned the city is looking for input for the artwork. An information packet and submission form is available in the lobby at Brookview. Submissions are due the end of August. 8. Adjournment MOTION: Moved by Kuebelbeck and seconded by Speltz to adjourn at 8:30 pm. Motion carried unanimously. ATTEST: John Cornelius, Chair Sheila Van Sloun, Administrative Assistant JOINT WATER COMMISSION MINUTES Golden Valley - Crystal - New Hope Meeting of July 12, 2017 The Golden Valley – Crystal – New Hope Joint Water Commission (JWC) meeting was called to order at 1:30 pm in the City of Golden Valley Council Chambers. Commissioners Present Anne Norris, City Manager, Crystal Kirk McDonald, City Manager, New Hope Tim Cruikshank, City Manager, Golden Valley Staff Present Marc Nevinski, Physical Development Director, Golden Valley Sue Virnig, Finance Director, Golden Valley Bernie Weber, Public Works Director, New Hope Dave Lemke, Operations Manager, New Hope Mark Ray, Director of Public Works/City Engineer, Crystal Joe Hansen, Utilities Supervisor Jeff Oliver, City Engineer, Golden Valley R.J. Kakach, Engineer, Golden Valley Approval of Minutes – July 12, 2017 Moved by McDonald seconded by Cruikshank to approve the minutes of the July 12, 2017 Joint Water Commission Meeting. Motion carried. 2018 Proposed Budget Staff reported on the proposed budget for 2018 using a 4% increase in water rates and an average of usage for the last three years. As of this date, staff has not been notified of any increase from Minneapolis. Staff reviewed fund balances and reserved $1,709,000 for the future well. Staff is requesting the Commission have a stable contribution and move down the fund balance to $1,000,000 versus $1,317,000 and project remain as stated. Staff reported the Commission has never approved a fund balance per year. However, there is now a fund balance from the well. Staff is requesting to build the reserve to be prepared for the next emergency and or catastrophe. There has been discussion of a fund balance in past years. The Commission is in agreement of a fund balance and a stable contribution. The Commission will revisit discussion of fund balance policy at the September or October meeting. Moved by McDonald seconded by Cruikshank to approve the revised 2018 Budget. Motion carried 2018 – 2022 Capital Improvement Projects Commission McDonald introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION 17-XX RESOLUTION OF THE JOINT WATER COMMISSION ADOPTING THE 2018 GENERAL FUND BUDGET The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Commissioner Cruikshank and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Norris, McDonald, and Cruikshank; and the following voted against the same; none; whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted; signed by the Chair and their signature attested by the Vice Chair. Joint Water Commission July 12, 2017 Page 2 of 2 2016 Financial Report and Management Report Review Moved by Cruikshank seconded by McDonald to approve the 2016 Financial Report and Management Report Review. Motion carried. Authorize Purchase of PCCP Adapters with Forterra Pressure Pipes Staff reported only one quote was received as Forterra is the only manufacture of this product. The quote is for three adapters and equipment only, no labor. Forterra is approximately 8-10 weeks out for delivery. Two adapters are on Golden Valley Road by the Courage Kenney which are 24” valves and one 16” at 30th and Douglas Drive. Moved by McDonald seconded by Cruikshank to approve the purchase of PCCP Adapters with Forterra Pressure Pipes. Motion carried. TAC Update • Water Supply Plan: Staff will calibrate and remodel with updated hydrant flows. Will work with Fire Department on the thresholds for different zoning and required maximum flows. Will follow-up with SEH on where we are at with testing and information for plan. • Elevated Tower: Requesting KLM for second quote on prioritizing long term maintenance and/or replacement of the three towers. Will schedule painting one tower every 7-10 years. Maintenance will be as long as possible Will examine flow model for raising and/or eliminating one/both of New Hope towers. • Reservoir Work: Parts have not arrived so project will begin in fall. • Tower Security: Staff will continue requesting information from Homeland Security • JWC 2017-2021 CIP: Crystal pump house roof reconstruction August or September Other Business/Next Meeting Staff instructed to include fund balance policy discussion on the September agenda. Adjournment Moved by McDonald seconded by Cruikshank to adjourn meeting. Motion carried. Chair Norris adjourned the meeting at 3:00 pm. _______________________________ Chair Anne Norris ATTEST: _________________________________ Sue Schwalbe, Recording Secretary JOINT WATER COMMISSION MINUTES Golden Valley - Crystal - New Hope Meeting of September 6, 2017 The Golden Valley – Crystal – New Hope Joint Water Commission (JWC) meeting was called to order at 1:00 pm in the City of Golden Valley Council Chambers. Commissioners Present Anne Norris, City Manager, Crystal Kirk McDonald, City Manager, New Hope Tim Cruikshank, City Manager, Golden Valley Staff Present Marc Nevinski, Physical Development Director, Golden Valley Sue Virnig, Finance Director, Golden Valley Bernie Weber, Public Works Director, New Hope Dave Lemke, Operations Manager, New Hope Mark Ray, Director of Public Works/City Engineer, Crystal Joe Hansen, Utilities Supervisor Jeff Oliver, City Engineer, Golden Valley R.J. Kakach, Engineer, Golden Valley Approval of Minutes – July 12, 2017 Moved by McDonald seconded by Cruikshank to approve the minutes of the July 12, 2017 Joint Water Commission Meeting. Motion carried. Award the 30th and Douglas Valve Replacement Project Staff reported the Valve Replacement at 30th Avenue and Douglas Drive was determined to be a high priority. TAC solicited and reviewed the two quotes received. TAC recommends awarding the contract to Valley Rich Company, Inc. as part of the 2017-2021 Joint Water Commission Capital Improvement Project #17-004. Moved by McDonald seconded by Cruikshank to Award the 30th Avenue and Douglas Drive Valve Replacement Project to Valley Rich in the amount of $31,800. Motion carried. Award Golden Valley Road and Mary Hills/Legend Drive Valve Replacement Project. Staff reported on the two highest priority valves to be replaced at (1) Golden Valley Road at the intersection of Mary Hills Drive and (2) Golden Valley Road at the intersection of Legend Drive. Staff solicited quotes for this project and recommends awarding a contract to Valley Rich Company, Inc. as part of the extending funds from previous years project in the amount of $360,000 budgeted for this project. Moved by Cruikshank seconded by McDonald to Award the Golden Valley Road and Mary Hills Drive/Legend Drive Valve Replacement Project to Valley Rich Company in the amount of $72,100. Motion carried. Fund Balance Discussion Staff was directed to determine a suitable dollar amount for an Operating Fund Balance. At this time, staff is recommending a level $1,000,000. Staff was directed to discuss with TAC and include this item on the October agenda. Joint Water Commission September 6, 2017 Page 2 of 2 TAC Update • Water Supply Plan: Staff will be meeting with SEH on 09-07-17 to discuss plan. • Elevated Tower: Met with KLM to discuss long term tower plan. Reviewed individual tower’s maintenance requirements prior to replacement. Medicine Lake Tower in best shape with a $4,000,000 estimated replacement cost. North Tower found to be in poorest condition with a $300,000 estimated inside paint and outside touch up needed. Golden Valley Tower satisfactory with a $200,000 inside and outside paint touchup needed. • Reservoir Work: Minnesota Mechanical is scheduled to provide service on the Golden Valley Reservoir for one month beginning September 1st. • Tower Security: Staff will be meeting with DOJ in September • Crystal Reservoir Inspection: KLM will inspect reservoir. • Crystal Pump House Reroofing: Project on hold awaiting for materials to arrive. • Golden Valley Generator Fire Suppression: Work will begin as soon as possible. • PCCP Analysis Update: TAC has determined valve priority. TAC will tabulate list and assign universal valve numbers to all JWC valves. Other Business/Next Meeting Next meeting scheduled for October 4, 2017 at 1:30 p.m. Adjournment Moved by McDonald seconded by Cruikshank to adjourn meeting. Motion carried. Chair Norris adjourned the meeting at 2:00 pm. _______________________________ Chair Anne Norris ATTEST: _________________________________ Sue Schwalbe, Recording Secretary Commissioners and city staff present: City Commissioner Alternate Commissioner Technical Advisory Committee Members (City Staff) Crystal Guy Mueller Absent Mark Ray Golden Valley Stacy Harwell [voting member first half] Jane McDonald Black [voting member second half] Eric Eckman Medicine Lake Clint Carlson Absent Absent Minneapolis Michael Welch NA Absent Minnetonka Mike Fruen Absent Absent New Hope Absent Pat Crough Megan Albert Plymouth Jim Prom [voting member first half] John Byrnes [voting member second half] Derek Asche Robbinsdale Michael Scanlan Absent Richard McCoy, Marta Roser St. Louis Park Jim De Lambert Absent Erick Francis Administrator Laura Jester, Keystone Waters Engineer Karen Chandler, Barr Engineering Recorder Dawn Pape, Lawn Chair Gardener Legal Counsel Troy Gilchrist, Kennedy & Graven Presenters/ Guests/Public Amy Thiel, Kuitt Excavating and Mr. Chuck Schmidt, Crystal resident Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission Minutes of Regular Meeting and Public Hearing Thursday, September 21, 2017 8:30 a.m. Golden Valley City Hall, Golden Valley MN BCWMC September 21, 2017 Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 8 1. CALL TO ORDER and ROLL CALL On Thursday, September 21, 2017 at 8:30 a.m. in the Council Conference Room at Golden Valley City Hall (7800 Golden Valley Rd.), Chair de Lambert called to order the meeting of the Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission (BCWMC) and asked for roll call to be taken. 2. CITIZEN FORUM ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS Chair de Lambert reported that Alternative Commissioner Gary Holter suffered a heart attack and is recuperating. Administrator Jester distributed a card for Commissioners to sign. 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA MOTION: Commissioner Prom moved to approve the agenda. Commissioner Mueller seconded the motion. Upon a vote, the motion carried 9-0. 4. CONSENT AGENDA The following items were approved as part of the consent agenda: the August 17, 2017 Commission Meeting Minutes, the September 2017 Financial Report, the payment of invoices, approval to Reimburse City of Golden Valley for Main Stem Restoration CIP Project. The general and construction account balances reported in the September 2017 Financial Report are as follows: Checking Account Balance $560,331.58 TOTAL GENERAL FUND BALANCE $560,331.58 TOTAL CASH & INVESTMENTS ON-HAND (9/12/17) $3,368,666.59 CIP Projects Levied – Budget Remaining (4,381,556.09) Closed Projects Remaining Balance ($1,012,889.50) 2012-2016 Anticipated Tax Levy Revenue $10,014.74 2017 Anticipated Tax Levy Revenue $643,220.55 Anticipated Closed Project Balance ($359,654.21) MOTION: Commissioner Prom moved to approve the consent agenda. Alternate Commissioner Crough seconded the motion. Upon a vote, the motion carried 9-0. 5. PUBLIC HEARING A. Receive Comments on Proposed 2018 CIP Project – Bassett Creek Park Pond Phase I Dredging Project: Winnetka Pond Dredging (BCP-2) The public hearing opened at 8:36 a.m. Commission Engineer Chandler gave a brief presentation with an overview of the Winnnetka Pond (East) Dredging Project. She noted that reasons for project include reducing sediment loading, BCWMC September 21, 2017 Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 8 improving wildlife habitat, and maintaining flood control functions of the pond. The project is estimated to reduce total phosphorus loading to North Branch Bassett Creek by 7.1 lbs/yr (according to the P8 model) or 51.7 lbs/yr (according to professional judgment calculations). Total suspended solid loading reduction is estimated at 1,823 lbs/yr as per the P8 model. There will also be a reduction in bacterial loading. The 30-yr annualized cost based on engineer Chandler’s professional judgment loading reduction will be $960/lb of phosphorus. Several stakeholder meetings have been held. Most of the cost of the project ($913,000) is for the dredging. Ms. Theil from an excavating company asked about construction timing. Engineer Chandler responded that the project design is slated for happen in 2018. The city will prefer to work over the winter, but it depends on the preferred timing of the hired construction company. Commissioner Harwell asked how dredging improves flood storage. Engineer Chandler explained that the sediment is accumulating and it is near the ordinary water level. Mr. Schmidt brought up concerns about runoff from railroad property on the east side of the pond. He noted that one reason why the pond needs to be dredged is because a large gully has formed along the railroad which continues to the pond. He noted that sand, sediment, branches and debris accumulate in the pond partially from the gully. Mr. Ray responded that the railroad has been notified of the gully and potential impacts to the tracks themselves, but the city has no jurisdiction and cannot compel them to act. Mr. Schmidt responded that it would make sense to remedy this situation before pond dredging starts. Mr. Schmidt also told the Commission about another ditch that eventually drains into the North Branch of Bassett Creek and that sand and debris are washing down from that area as well. Commissioner Harwell thanked Mr. Schmidt for coming and is wondering if there are creative solutions to take care of problems that are happening on railroad property. The response was that the city will keep trying to get the railroad to act and the city will need to look into different ways to design the project. Mr. Schmidt also remarked on the size of the grate spacing at the pond’s outlet. Engineer Chandler agreed that a different outlet design could be considered in coordination with the city. The public hearing was closed at 9:02 a.m. 6. BUSINESS A. Consider Approval of Resolution 17-06 Ordering 2018 Improvement Administrator Jester described the various pieces of the resolution. She walked through a memo with her recommendation to request a final 2018 levy of $1,346,815, the same as the maximum levy submitted to the County earlier in the year. She also noted that adoption of the resolution includes approval of an agreement with the City of Crystal to implement the project. She pointed out that agreement includes language noting that although the city assumes responsibility for future maintenance of the project, it doesn’t preclude the city from requesting CIP funds for a future dredging project. Administrator Jester indicated this language is slightly different from previous agreements with cities because it’s the first CIP project that involves dredging a pond. Mr. Asche noted that previous CIP projects have involved pond construction and dredging and that no similar language was included in agreements with those cities. He noted the City of Plymouth has already dredged West Medicine Lake Pond (which was installed as a BCWMC CIP project) at a cost of $200,000 and that it needs to be dredged again. He wondered if this agreement sets a precedence and expectations of cities being responsible for on-going maintenance of CIP projects. Commission Engineer Chandler noted that ponds on the BCWMC trunk system such as Bassett Creek Park Pond, Winnetka Pond, and West Medicine Lake Pond are under BCWMC’s purview. Commissioner Welch noted that language in the agreement with Crystal simply indicates that this pond is not ineligible for future CIP funding. He noted that if dredging this pond or a pond in Plymouth on the trunk system was presented to the Commission for CIP funding, they would be eligible for consideration. Attorney Gilchrist echoed Commissioner Welch by stating the language in the agreement doesn’t obligate the Commission to do something in BCWMC September 21, 2017 Meeting Minutes Page 4 of 8 the future, that the new language should be what’s been assumed with past agreements, and that cities can request future CIP funds for large projects in the same area. This comment was followed by a discussion about whether this agreement language is a policy change. Commissioner Carlson asked whether this means the city is ultimately responsible. Attorney Gilchrist clarified that the Commission has a limited role in these projects. The new language says Crystal isn’t precluded from coming back to the Commission. Commissioner Harwell thought this item will need future discussion so there is a clear understanding. Administrator Jester noted that one of the CIP “gatekeeper questions” is whether or not the project is on the BCWMC trunk system. Commissioner Scanlan recommended that the TAC discuss and define “maintenance.” Commissioner Welch responded that “maintenance” can’t be always defined, but the policy issue can be discussed in the future. He then stated that he was more concerned with buffer maintenance. Engineer Chandler agreed that maintenance of the pond’s buffer will need to be worked out with the property owner and/or the city. MOTION: Commissioner Scanlan moved to approve Resolution 17-06 Ordering 2018 Improvement. Commissioner Carlson seconded the motion. Upon a vote, the motion carried 9-0. B. Consider Approval of Proposal to Develop Aquatic Invasive Species Rapid Response Plan Administrator Jester’s overview reminded the Commission that several APM/AIS Committee recommendations were approved at the July meeting and included directing the Commission Engineer to submit a proposal to develop a rapid response plan for key invasive species in priority lakes. Engineer Chandler added that the proposed plan will: i. Determine how the Commission responds to AIS species found in priority one lakes ii. Determine what the response to the specific AIS species in specific to the water bodies should be iii. Define responsible parties and funding partners’ roles Welch suggested that BCWMC contact MCWD because they have a very well developed AIS plan so the BCWMC doesn’t have to “reinvent the wheel.” Eric Eckman asked whether toxic blue-green algae addressed and was told that it won’t be addressed in this plan because it’s not an invasive. Commissioner Harwell asked about AIS that aren’t known about yet and Engineer Chandler responded by saying general parts of the plan address this, but there wouldn’t be specifics. She noted they had to put boundaries on plan because there was only a budget of $15,000. The plan could be amended in the future if needed. MOTION: Commissioner Welch moved to approve the Proposal to Develop Aquatic Invasive Species Rapid Response Plan. Commissioner Scanlan seconded the motion. Upon a vote, the motion carried 9-0. C. Consider Approval of Technical Advisory Committee Recommendations TAC Chair Erick Francis, reported that the TAC met on August 4th to discuss multiple topics and had recommendations for Commission consideration. He briefly reviewed the recommendations including directing the Commission Engineer to develop a scope and budget for completing the tasks laid out for the FEMA modeling work and to submit that scope and budget to the DNR to seek FEMA grant funds to complete the work. Commission Engineer Chandler discussed the map revision process and reported that the DNR is receiving grant funds from FEMA to develop hydrologic and hydraulic models and that the TAC had discussed the pros and cons of the Commission submitting a proposal to the DNR to do this work. She noted the work would be done by the DNR or its consultants if the Commission did not want to perform the work. She noted that if the Commission proposes to do the work, the cost of developing the proposal (estimated at $2,000) would be a Commission expense but that all actual work on the modeling would be covered by the FEMA grant. She also noted that that if the DNR does the work rather than the Commission, there is likely to be considerable Commission expenses in reviewing and discussing DNR’s work. There was discussion about what would be involved with the work and how it differs from the modeling work recently completed by the Commission. Commissioner Prom noted his opposition to the Commission performing the work because the Commission may incur liability for flood damages that weren’t predicted by the modeling. Commissioner Harwell shared her experience that if DNR does the work, it would be many years before it’s complete. Attorney Gilchrist explained that “liability” is a breech in duty. He noted the risk in liability for BCWMC is low because BCWMC is using the best data possible. BCWMC September 21, 2017 Meeting Minutes Page 5 of 8 Mr. Eckman commented that the TAC discussed the fact that there are already difference between the BCWMC and FEMA flood elevations and that FEMA elevations are outdated. He compared it to using traffic information from 1980 to build modern roads. He noted the fact that there are two different elevations is confusing for property owner and realtors. There was discussion about how this work would change the Commission’s XP-SWMM model. If the DNR does the work, there would be two different models for the watershed but if the Commission does the work, the Commission’s model would be used by both the Commission and the state and federal agencies. MOTION: Commissioner Scanlan moved to approve the TAC recommendation to direct the Commission Engineer to develop a scope and budget for completing the tasks laid out for the FEMA modeling work and to submit that scope and budget to the DNR to seek FEMA grant funds to complete the work. Commissioner Prom seconded the motion. Upon a vote, the motion carried 8-1 with Plymouth Commissioner voting nay. Continuing with TAC recommendations, Mr. Francis reported that the TAC recommends adjusting the Commission’s review fees and to add a provision to charge actual costs for reviews that exceed $5,000 in expenses. Commission Engineer Chandler further described the TAC’s discussion noting that at the March 27, 2017 BCWMC Budget Committee meeting, the committee discussed the discrepancy between development review expenses and the fees collected. It was noted that in 2016 and 2017 there were a few large, complicated projects that required much more time to review and to coordinate with developers about the XP-SWMM model and MIDS, than was recovered in fees. The Budget Committee requested TAC input on the issue. The TAC reviewed data provided by the Commission Engineers showing reviews, fees, and a comparison of fees collected with the current structure and fees that would have been collected if their proposed new structure was in place. It was noted that the current fee schedule is based on project size but that smaller parcels often have more complicated and time-consuming projects. Commission Engineer Chandler presented a proposed restructured fee schedule that attempts to base fees more on review effort than project size. She noted that the proposed fee schedule still includes lower fees for single-family homes and municipal projects because the Commission does not intend to burden single-family homeowners with high fees, and the Commission offers lower fees to municipalities that fund the operating budget of the Commission. TAC members discussed situations where reviews take considerable time and expense. There was consensus that escrow accounts are too complicated and time consuming to administer. Instead, the TAC recommended that the Commission charge project proposers for actual expenses when a project review exceeds $5,000. Mr. Asche commented that he thought the revised fees were going in the right direction but asked if reviews could be provided through a flat fee from Barr Engineering to the Commission. Administrator Jester noted that that would have to go through a re-negotiated contract with Barr Engineering. She pointed out the proposed fee schedule would have reduced the Commission’s loss by 75%. Commissioner Harwell noted that project plans are vary widely and there is a lot of hand-holding which costs money. She commented that it would be appropriate for single-family homeowners to pay over $5,000 if their project is complicated. Commissioner Prom said he thought it should be equity in fees among developers, homeowners and cities. Mr. Eckman offered that there may be a risk for developers with unknown expenses and wondered if a cap is appropriate. Alternate Commissioner McDonald Black commented that cities already pay into the BCWMC so having to pay a potentially higher fee would cause cities to pay twice. Mr. Asche noted he supported the changed but requested that the Commission consider negotiating a flat fee from Barr Engineering. MOTION: Commissioner Mueller moved to approve the TAC recommendation without exemption for single-family lots and cities for paying actual costs above $5,000. Commissioner Scanlan seconded it. Upon a vote, the motion carried 8-1 with Minneapolis Commissioner voting nay. MOTION: Commissioner Prom moved to approve Resolution 17-07 adopting the revised review fee schedule. Commissioner Scanlan seconded it. Upon a vote, the motion carried 8-1 with Minneapolis Commissioner voting nay. TAC recommendations #3 and #4 were set aside to a future meeting. BCWMC September 21, 2017 Meeting Minutes Page 6 of 8 D. Consider Approval of Proposals to Develop Feasibility Studies for 2019 CIP Projects Administrator Jester reminded the Commission that there are 3 CIP projects slated for implementation in 2019 and that feasibility studies should get underway this fall because some fieldwork is required. She noted that each of the cities where the projects are located asked the Commission Engineer to complete the feasibility study. i. Medicine Lake Road and Winnetka Avenue Area Long Term Flood Mitigation Plan Implementation Phase I: DeCola Ponds B & C Improvement Project (BC-2, BC-3 & BC-8) Commission Engineer Chandler reviewed the proposal to implement one portion of the recently completed Medicine Lake Road and Winnetka Avenue Area Long Term Flood Mitigation Plan. She discussed that much work had already been accomplished through the development of the flood mitigation plan but that some more investigation and field work is needed along with engaging residents and stakeholders. She walked through the specific recommendations in the proposal. Commissioners Scanlan and Welch expressed displeasure for the need for action on these proposals at this meeting and asked that future items be brought to the Commission for discussion and consideration before an actual decision is needed. Administrator Jester apologized for the short timeframe and noted that any of these proposals could be held until the October meeting if warranted. MOTION: Commissioner Scanlan moved to approve the proposal to complete a feasibility study for the Medicine Lake Road and Winnetka Avenue Area Long Term Flood Mitigation Plan Implementation Phase I. Commissioner Prom seconded the motion. [Commissioner Prom departs; Alt. Commissioner Byrnes assumes representation for Plymouth.] Discussion on the motion: There was discussion about what the project would entail, how the total price tag for projects in the Flood Mitigation Plan is $22M, how this CIP project is just one $1,6M piece of the Flood Mitigation Plan, how the City of Golden Valley has already implemented one part of the Flood Mitigation Plan, and that additional funding partners would be sought to implement other aspects of the over Flood Mitigation Plan. Commissioner Welch noted his disagreement with the component of the proposal that entails wetland bank scoping because doesn’t think the Commission should be putting capital dollars to offset wetland destruction somewhere else. There was also a discussion about the proposed environmental review that included digging test trenches on private land. Commissioner Welch noted that a site should be enrolled in the Voluntary XXX Program before invasive soil testing is done so as not to expose the Commission to liability if contamination is discovered. Finally, Commissioner Welch asked if the city forester could perform the tree survey rather than the Commission Engineers. Mr. Eckman noted that the city forester has multiple responsibilities and a full plate and that the tree survey is an important component of the feasibility study that should be completed early in the process to appropriately engage residents. [Commissioner Harwell departed; Alt. Commissioner McDonald Black assumes representation for Golden Valley.] Engineer Chandler said wetland banking could be removed from the proposal if the Commission chooses to remove it. She responded that test trenching is needed because the project will likely involve excavation. She told the Commission that there is an easement over in this area and she wondered if that wasn’t sufficient in giving rights to test trench. Commissioner Welch replied that if the Commission performs a test trench, they are “in the mix” as a liable partner. Welch offered that maybe the city does have this liability covered. Engineer Chandler asked if it could be left in the proposal with the caveat of needing to have this liability addressed. MOTION: Commissioner Welch moved to amend motion on the floor to remove wetland banking investigation from the proposal. Alt. Commissioner Byrnes seconded the motion. Upon a vote, the motion carried 9-0. BCWMC September 21, 2017 Meeting Minutes Page 7 of 8 MOTION: Commissioner Welch moved to amend the motion on the floor to remove invasive testing of the soil from the proposal. Commissioner Scanlan seconded it. Motion carried 9-0. MOTION: Commissioner Welch moved to amend the motion on the floor to cap the feasibility study cost not to exceed $72,000. Commissioner Mueller seconded the motion. Upon a vote, the motion carried 9-0. VOTE: Upon a vote of the original motion including the three amendments, the motion carried 9-0. [Commissioner Fruen departs.] ii. Westwood Lake Water Quality Improvement Project (WST-2) Commission Engineer Chandler briefly described the proposal for a feasibility study of the Westwood Lake Water Quality Improvement Project noting that it’s part of a much larger city project in Westwood Nature Center. She noted it is in the BCWMC’s current CIP, listed as project WST-2 with a total estimated cost of $300,000. She also noted that the project could entail pervious pavers, improvements to an existing stormwater pond, or other practices that would go “above and beyond” the treatment required for the complete city project. There was a brief discussion about the tasks that will be completed by the city vs. those to be completed by the Commission Engineer. MOTION: Commissioner Welch moved to approve the proposal to complete a feasibility study for the Westwood Lake Water Quality Improvement Project. Commissioner Scanlan seconded the motion. Upon a vote, the motion carried 8-0 with. [City of Minnetonka absent from the vote.] iii. Bryn Mawr Meadows Water Quality Improvement Project (BC-5) Commission Engineer Chandler walked through the proposal noting that the Bryn Mawr Meadows Water Quality Improvement Project is in the BCWMC’s current CIP, listed as project BC-5 with a cost of $500,000. She noted that park is owned by the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board and the project would treat water from a large residential area greater than 300 acres. She reported that field investigations include test trenching and soil borings but significant field work may not be warranted depending on the alternatives to be studied. Commissioner Welch noted it’s a heavily used park with very poor, spongy soils and he doubted if ponding would be an option due to high groundwater and contamination. He expressed concern for whether test trenching was even warranted. MOTION: Commissioner Welch moved to approve the scope of work with test trenching to be completed only done if the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board enrolls in VIC. Commissioner Scanlan seconded the motion. Upon a vote, the motion carried 8-0 with. [City of Minnetonka absent from the vote.] E. Consider Approval of Recommendations of the Aquatic Plant Management/Aquatic Invasive Species Committee Tabled to a future meeting. 7. COMMUNICATIONS A. Administrator’s Report i. Update on Chloride Training Recruitment - Currently 29 people registered ii. Report on Main Stem Project Open House - 11 people attended; some comments from residents including a desire for a nicer footpath and concerns with navigability of the creek. B. Chair – No report C. Commissioners i. Report on Golden Valley Arts and Music Festival BCWMC September 21, 2017 Meeting Minutes Page 8 of 8 Scanlan, Harwell, and Welch attended. Many people played the new bean bag toss game/display and salt cups were given away as prizes. D. TAC Members—No report E. Committees —No report F. Legal Counsel—No report G. Engineer—No report 8. INFORMATION ONLY (Information online only) A. CIP Project Updates: Available Online http://www.bassettcreekwmo.org/projects B. Grant Tracking Summary and Spreadsheet C. Freshwater Society Recruiting Master Water Stewards D. Governor Dayton’s 25% by 2025 Clean Water Initiative – Town Hall Meetings. The date has changed and it will be on Wednesday, not Tuesday. E. WCA Notice of Application, Plymouth F. Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Cottageville Park Video G. Freshwater Society Newsletters and Sign Up H. WCA Notice of Application, Golden Valley 9. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 11:59 a.m. ________________________________________ ______________________________________________ Signature/Title Date Signature/Title Date Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting November 21, 2017 Agenda Item 3. E. 1. Authorize Contract for Wesley Park tennis courts & Wildwood Park Pickleball courts Prepared By Rick Birno, Director of Parks and Recreation Summary Staff solicited bids for the reconstruction of four tennis courts at South Wesley Park and the tennis court replacement of six Pickleball courts at Wildwood Park. The project was advertised on October 19th with sealed bids due on November 7th. The bids received are as follows: Company Bid Alt. #1 Alt. #2 Alt. #3 Meyer Contracting $417,351.31 $19,214.18 $2,715.15 $ 7,433.00 Sunram $446,200.00 $16,600.00 $3,000.00 $ 9,000.00 Bituminous Roadway $446,303.00 $37,000.00 $3,000.00 $10,000.00 Buck Blacktop, Inc. $474,377.00 $14,000.00 $2,700.00 $18,000.00 Veit $548,418.00 $ 4,875.00 $2,750.00 $ 8,393.00 Funds are budgeted in the 2017-2021 Park CIP and 2018-2022 Park CIP fund for the reconstruction of the courts for a total of $480,000. Staff was also planning to replace the tennis court lights at South Wesley Park during this reconstruction project, unfortunately the bids came in higher than anticipated and therefore the tennis court lights will not be replaced in 2018. Staff will work with the Open Space and Recreation Commission during the planning of the 2019 Park Improvement CIP to determine if funds can be identified to replace the tennis lights. If funds are identified, the replacement of the lights will be recommended to the City Council in the 2019 CIP. Staff is recommending City Council approve the tennis court and pickleball court improvements in the amount of $417,351.31 for the base bid, approve alternate #2 for $2,715.15 and alternate #3 for $7,433.00 for a total amount of $427,499.46 from Meyer Contracting. Recommended Action Motion to authorize staff to sign contract with Meyer Contracting for the tennis and pickleball court improvements at South Wesley & Wildwood Parks for an amount of $427,499.46. Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting November 21, 2017 Agenda Item 3. E. 2. Approve Purchase of a Bobcat 5600 and Attachments Prepared By Rick Birno, Director of Parks and Recreation Summary Staff met to discuss additional winter snow removal and safe surface needs for the new Brookview sidewalks, paths, entry ways, patios and parking lots. Public Works staff can continue to provide support with large removal equipment for the primary areas however does not have the equipment or staff to remove snow in the new smaller lots, paths, entry ways and sidewalks. Brookview is now a seven day a week operation with significant more hard surfaces to keep clean. Staff recommendation is to invest in a Bobcat 5600 with appropriate attachments for the snow removal areas utilizing staff from golf course and Brookview maintenance. Staff has solicited a quote from the State Bid Contract #E-110(5) MN ATV for the new Bobcat and needed attachments. Staff will utilize this equipment for snow removal, salt & sand spreading along all hard surfaces in and around Brookview as well as the parking areas to the north, east and south. It will also be utilized for maintenance work in and around Brookview during the spring, summer and fall months. The funds for this purchase will come from the contingency fund of the new Brookview. The state bid quote from Tri-State Bobcat, Inc. for the purchase of one Bobcat 5600 and required attachments is as follows: Tri-State (Bobcat 5600) $40,578.40 Tri-State (Maintenance Attachments) $22,501.80 Recommended Action Motion to approve the purchase of a Bobcat 5600 and maintenance attachments from Tri-State Bobcat, Inc. through state purchasing contract #E-110(5) MN ATV in the amount of $63,080.20. Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting November 21, 2017 Agenda Item 3. F. Approval of Plat - Lions Park View Prepared By Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager Summary At the October 3, 2017, City Council meeting, the Council held a public hearing on the Preliminary Plat for the minor subdivision of Lions Park View (7200 Harold Ave). After the hearing, the Council approved the Preliminary Plat which will allow two lots. The Final Plat has now been presented to the City. Staff has reviewed the Final Plat and finds it consistent with the approved Preliminary Plat and the requirements of City Code. Attachments • Resolution for Approval of Plat - Lions Park View (1 page) • Final Plat of Lions Park View (1 page) Recommended Action Motion to adopt Resolution for Approval of Plat - Lions Park View. Resolution 17-71 November 21, 2017 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION FOR APPROVAL OF PLAT - LIONS PARK VIEW WHEREAS, the City Council for the City of Golden Valley, pursuant to due notice, has heretofore conducted a public hearing on the proposed plat to be known as Lions Park View covering the following described tracts of land: Lot 39, except the Easterly 100 feet, front and rear thereof, “Auditor’s Subdivision No. 322, Hennepin County, Minn.” WHEREAS, all persons present were given the opportunity to be heard; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council for the City of Golden Valley, that said proposed plat be, and the same hereby is, accepted and approved, and the proper officers of the City are hereby authorized and instructed to sign the original of said plat and to do all other things necessary and proper in the premises. _____________________________ Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: _____________________________ Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by the City Clerk. 0 a a - a o D vi. o> v.o« 3 0 '� m 3O- ..c"�a Ep °Eur v° o: .: U D Tp °Jo o ° Dodo 0 0 T3 p o. v D u o o L T d YDa C p W`U O. T n c I« o«u a a D °:a d s E ° v °uo = v oNo q�o�cL I `c3vE o N N _ W m' O N UG y j'Orao ooa v6+ma C �N v oac v _ o z aT o c >o'-o QEo o v t � T,E- V nTN a d E`o;o Uof ° - ° a E o' r TIa LE.210 ° mpY °z Tv c�r royo °c .oN. oU n c0 o ° c .Tn c m m 50 ° o Da"ao U t a o v ° o c o c J O O d 6 o ,6o o an v of dt°p;c a� c cd r o Ez r N« E U m o w dLo;u `va D oL D N y T 3 v ZO T _O J V �_ O.�PO N I J° d O«_ T `10 C 0' Er--� Jp C d ...L Z ..; r U D O 3 �y m w o v 3°oc.^ NN a - v as ° m V > u p�, c N ° n o c - N y N v ' 0o a o c o a u ov_'`..v -� « o v .o N v. Y E 13 o v[' = o «L5 n °-E°T" mJ _ .o �pa c a o ° oq < V om c o.m ° as `o _vD n o U m s 8 a u o -�• ti W E Is E « $°'r n o a' E o o N �'- v d ° u °vo-.y E� v oT3 ' vLo h O y o N ° O O O L.�.o C « O_c °O O N = N 1 O S'� C L S'. o S', Z 2 N W N 3 v= Z ^'° L H Z 6>`' 'c O m m I m m C O V m 2 m wa O Tm 0] D WNN;00 OV Nam U . O p C O D E y vN y U nil an o �� = 9D Ut�oriv ro ; Aso m U v inm vc a 3,�Er '`�o=�0 3 ovl {� a U y r D C° O N a O F S 1M r T F y Y c C _ m a ° m ; °O H O+ W O p L>O` O c N = m30 3 0« °0o Oma�O r o W K«O�> w O �•O aV7- N; Z < mpo ° C N Z� b 0. u ; a 2 v N° a p a r o d V Q o S N �« o yE3ov > zo,6�v.c mw-6 a.. is Lv �mpoNN E dE T < w S ° o v �o n Nv mo IG cEd .o - > °--ooD `- v C 2 c y o ' jLo `• ia z T yO p u EJ Z O 3 T 1~/1 1-1-° rE 3 L 0 ° O Q o 1E t N C t O W R I W O Y¢ 2 d D --ml O N U H U' F E O.•O. C L o IZ N 0_ -N 01-1 -a- �'W W zw ~--- o.R u Ay s • ai' a L -- ---�- 09I M �_ ,c-I oT •v,S_°a' z ~ wao � oto Fes+ z zDoi 0 B g W LL n s a = hum IX z�� 1 aN al--� - fig$ �- -: 1-Z-I a ^e a E lJ c$ z I I I • o m�•��B w I it << I I I I I I I cc I AA AI I I ----_-_-- 71.0----------I yj I I I I I - V iA. v ` AI .1 -7 I 99 � � I I V V J I_. �I I �I I -F — — — — — — — 7- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -� — =+ ^ „tl1053NNIW'A1NnOO Nld3NN3H 1 ^ I ^ 'ZZf H39"m NOISWOBOS I `[S,NOl10ntl„'6f m)o awl 7603-__�' I I I F a N011d30X3 an= I 'I w 16 ,VIOS3NNIN'A1Nn00 Nld3NN3H 'ZZf 836NON NOISAIOBnS L.j I I S,60110ntl„'6£101 l0 7661__ o N` 00001 7603 647 to"1 "Ill C �Z w° [Ii c7aU 3 t t Z4OOS 001K �;o - -5w > -� jw 61'61 J 4 _-`., , 19'LfC -Zgc,Zf9t'ON 7uawn0o0 lad luau1aa03'u Sl \vv I - i 10 r-- . % Q �[ V 'I 11 3 M dv N xAlillIn- I <( �_ •'�^� < \\ \ ______(�_---�uaw--- -----_-- - _ 66--1010__-I_.-_--------- -------- - ------ v a[ J , i I\-, al Y Lm ,ys\ i _ 1 ----- ----�--- 71.11- --------- �ml ZNn OrtS\ %` '� .-Puol laM to a6P�� r�-J------------- LS'O61 _ _- - =r a 01 om d �'<\ \ -f(`� (�� 3.1 L.Z4e005 (Li .i \ -�� _^3.60.95.055 F- I n�W` m�1 v T S \ 46'1 a Q °1= E -,<-:: soazam"E �J O j 390-g O> oPgrr) I Coan� w 10 1 ulzo J ------- cno l \r h w� aNr L--------------------- M.L4,1f.00N----------- -_.-----` I J Wt ow� -----�------1 X00 C -> oOz !'�� a�� r------------------- CC I `- a 101 e' I3- � s a mol 'y r J CD 75.0 10 L------ ----F - ------------------------------- _-----_____J Ioo Ls£ ' J 1 .tl10S3NNlN'A1NnOO NId3NN3H > a gv. •ZZf a3sym Nols�Taens__.' M.L1',Lf.00N E I s.No110nv„'6£m1 to aull 76amly- _ < I z I I �- � „tl1OS3NNIN _ O _ 'A1Nn00 Nld3NN3H 'ZZf 08n NOISNIOBns S.HOlIOn,, 04 101 l0 w 7so3 047 to auil 76am- — — — — — — — — — — V 'I-um _ w f � o Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting November 21, 2017 Agenda Item 3. G. Receipt of October 2017 Financial Reports Prepared By Sue Virnig, Finance Director Summary The monthly financial report provides a progress report of the following funds: ∼ General Fund Operations ∼ Conservation/Recycling Fund (Enterprise Fund) ∼ Water and Sewer Utility Fund (Enterprise Fund) ∼ Brookview Golf Course (Enterprise Fund) ∼ Motor Vehicle Licensing (Enterprise Fund) ∼ Storm Utility Fund (Enterprise Fund) ∼ Equipment Replacement Fund (Capital Projects Fund) ∼ Brookview Center (Special Revenue Fund) ∼ Building Improvement Fund (Capital Projects Fund) ∼ Park Improvement Fund (Capital Projects Fund) General Fund Operations: As of October 2017, the City has used $2,137,399 of fund balance to balance the General Fund Budget. Attachments • October 2017 General Fund Financial Reports (2 pages) • October 2017 Conservation/Recycling Fund (1 page) • October 2017 Water and Sewer Utility Fund (1 page) • October 2017 Brookview Golf Course (1 page) • October 2017 Motor Vehicle Licensing (1 page) • October 2017 Storm Utility Fund (1 page) • October 2017 Equipment Replacement Fund (1 page) • October 2017 Brookview Center Fund (1 page) • October 2017 Building Improvement Fund (1 page) • October 2017 Park Improvement Fund (1 page) Recommended Action Motion to receive and file the October 2017 Financial Reports. Over % 2017 October YTD (Under)Of Budget Budget Actual Actual Budget Expend. 001 Council $362,710 24,604 261,132 ($101,578)71.99% 003 City Manager 816,815 81,877 590,297 (226,518)72.27% 004 Transfers Out 850,000 0 850,000 0 100.00%(1) 005 Admin. Services 1,874,665 166,774 1,538,928 (335,737)82.09% 006 Legal 155,000 30,949 141,189 (13,811)91.09%(2) 007 Risk Management 305,000 57,946 245,543 (59,457)80.51% 011 General Gov't. Bldgs.583,635 30,112 388,124 (195,511)66.50% 016 Planning 362,450 37,974 257,355 (105,095)71.00% 018 Inspections 791,310 82,809 554,141 (237,169)70.03% 022 Police 5,885,265 602,009 4,411,375 (1,473,890)74.96% 023 Fire 1,494,620 119,152 1,040,658 (453,962)69.63% 035 Physical Dev Admin 304,310 35,120 235,788 (68,522)77.48% 036 Engineering 803,380 86,128 577,878 (225,502)71.93% 037 Streets 1,609,730 104,682 1,122,789 (486,941)69.75% 066 Park & Rec. Admin.719,970 81,124 597,049 (122,921)82.93% 067 Park Maintenance 1,170,340 161,158 976,301 (194,039)83.42% 068 Recreation Programs 418,845 27,783 285,843 (133,002)68.25% TOTAL Expenditures $18,508,045 $1,730,201 $14,074,390 ($4,433,655)76.04% (1) This transfer was made in June, 2017. (2) Legal services are billed thru September. City of Golden Valley Monthly Budget Report - General Fund Expenditures October, 2017 (unaudited) Division 83.00% Over % 2017 October YTD (Under)of Budget Type Budget Actual Actual Budget Received Ad Valorem Taxes $14,814,685 0 7,528,262 ($7,286,423)50.82%(1) Licenses 217,365 4,535 237,829 $20,464 109.41% Permits 902,475 107,033 2,124,613 $1,222,138 235.42% Federal Grants 0 0 12,395 $12,395 State Aid 268,380 0 215,124 ($53,256)80.16%(2) Charges For Services: General Government 19,000 319 44,178 $25,178 232.52% Public Safety 154,175 6,006 136,361 ($17,814)88.45% Public Works 150,800 13,570 145,268 ($5,532)96.33% Park & Rec 385,350 43,161 351,689 ($33,661)91.26% Other Funds 791,500 71,945 630,455 ($161,045)79.65% Fines & Forfeitures 300,000 36,788 304,079 $4,079 101.36%(3) Interest On Investments 75,000 0 0 ($75,000)0.00%(4) Miscellaneous Revenue 233,000 21,360 181,738 ($51,262)78.00% Transfers In 30,000 2,500 25,000 ($5,000)83.33%(5) TOTAL Revenue $18,341,730 $307,217 $11,936,991 ($6,404,739)65.08% Notes: (1) Payments are received in July, December, and January (delinquencies). (2) Police Training will be paid in August. Safe and Sober is billed on time spent. Fire Training reimbursement is $48,662. Second half of LGA is paid in Dec. (3) Fines/Forfeitures are thru for September 2017. (4) Investment income is allocated at year end. (5)Transfers are monthly. Percentage Of Year Completed City of Golden Valley Monthly Budget Report - General Fund Revenues October 2017 (unaudited) Over 2017 October YTD (Under)% Budget Actual Actual Budget Current Revenue Hennepin County Recycling Grant 61,230 0 56,237 (4,993)91.85%(4) Recycling Charges 382,520 33,987 292,409 (90,111)76.44%(2) Miscellaneous Revenues 8,000 9,521 9,521 1,521 Interest on Investments 4,000 0 0 (4,000)0.00%(1) Total Revenue 455,750 43,508 358,167 (97,583)78.59% Expenses: Recycling 466,795 38,976 293,730 (173,065)62.92%(3) Total Expenses 466,795 38,976 293,730 (173,065)62.92% (1) Interest Earnings are allocated at year-end. (2) Includes utility billings thru October 2017. (3) Republic Services are billed thru September and are receiving rebates again. (4) Grant reduced due to no compost program. City of Golden Valley Monthly Budget Report - Conservation/Recycling Enterprise Fund October 2017 (unaudited) Over 2017 October YTD (Under)% Budget Actual Actual Budget Current Revenue Water Charges 4,432,200 569,171 3,959,763 (472,437)89.34% Emergency Water Supply 183,600 27,384 191,215 7,615 104.15% Sewer Charges 3,410,000 368,772 2,835,385 (574,615)83.15% Meter Sales 8,000 1,138 27,599 19,599 344.99% Penalties 110,000 42,506 175,521 65,521 159.56% Charges for Other Services 90,000 7,382 251,510 161,510 279.46% State Water Testing Fee Pass Through 45,500 4,100 34,685 (10,815)76.23% Sale of Assets 10,000 0 55,058 45,058 550.58% Franchise Fees 400,000 0 400,000 0 100.00% Certificate of Compliance 75,000 6,450 66,075 (8,925)88.10% Interest Earnings 15,000 0 0 (15,000)0.00% Total Revenue 8,779,300 1,026,903 7,996,811 (782,489)91.09% Expenses: Utility Administration 2,279,610 39,895 2,246,765 (32,845)98.56% Sewer Maintenance 2,809,045 239,396 2,177,417 (631,628)77.51% Water Maintenance 4,772,390 409,635 3,184,029 (1,588,361)66.72% Total Expenses 9,861,045 688,926 7,608,211 (2,252,834)77.15% City of Golden Valley Monthly Budget Report - Water and Sewer Utility Enterprise Fund October, 2017 (unaudited) Over 2017 October YTD (Under)% Budget Actual Actual Budget Current Revenue Green Fees 852,460 50,279 827,487 (24,973)97.07% Driving Range Fees 151,955 6,002 174,548 22,593 114.87% Par 3 Fees 165,000 690 149,678 (15,322)90.71% Lawn Bowling 45,000 837 58,765 13,765 130.59% Pro Shop Sales 90,000 1,316 70,626 (19,374)78.47% Pro Shop Rentals 285,000 19,733 267,922 (17,078)94.01% Concession Sales 415,000 14,346 436,613 21,613 105.21% Other Revenue 80,150 30,098 116,751 36,601 145.67% Interest Earnings 5,000 0 0 (5,000)0.00%(1) Less: Credit Card Charges/Sales Tax (46,000)(7,977)(41,283)4,717 89.75% Total Revenue 2,043,565 115,324 2,061,107 17,542 100.86% Expenses: Golf Operations 715,020 68,755 635,269 (79,751)88.85%(2) Course Maintenance 1,020,780 72,959 814,516 (206,264)79.79% Pro Shop 125,220 564 97,615 (27,605)77.95% Grill 307,840 13,798 353,477 45,637 114.82% Driving Range 59,695 4,823 75,848 16,153 127.06% Par 3 Course 24,995 782 24,761 (234)99.06% Lawn Bowling 21,245 818 15,682 (5,563)73.82% Total Expenses 2,274,795 162,499 2,017,168 (257,627)88.67% (1) Interest Earnings are allocated at year-end. (2) Depreciation is allocated at year-end. City of Golden Valley Monthly Budget Report - Brookview Golf Course Enterprise Fund October, 2017 (unaudited) opened March 31; Grill closed 9-20; Course 11-8 Over 2017 October YTD (Under)% Budget Actual Actual Budget Current Revenue Interest Earnings 2,000 0 0 (2,000)0.00%(1) Charges for Services 423,165 31,332 391,863 (31,302)92.60% Total Revenue 425,165 31,332 391,863 (33,302)92.17% Expenses: Motor Vehicle Licensing 424,720 57,893 352,460 (72,260)82.99% Total Expenses 424,720 57,893 352,460 (72,260)82.99% (1) Interest Earnings are allocated at year-end. City of Golden Valley Monthly Budget Report - Motor Vehicle Licensing Enterprise Fund October 2017 (unaudited) Over 2017 October YTD (Under)% Budget Actual Actual Budget Current Revenue Interest Earnings 50,000 0 0 (50,000)0.00%(1) Interest Earnings-Other 0 29,813 31,879 31,879 Storm Sewer Charges 2,375,000 203,814 1,873,838 (501,162)78.90% Bassett Creek Watershed 0 0 0 0 Miscellaneous Receipts 207,775 0 56,488 (151,287) Sale or Loss of Assets 0 0 17,800 17,800 State Grant - Other 0 0 282,188 282,188 Total Revenue 2,632,775 233,627 2,262,193 (370,582)85.92% Expenses: Storm Utility 3,527,930 714,912 4,141,234 613,304 117.38%(2) Street Cleaning 128,000 6,902 54,940 (73,060)42.92% Environmental Control 317,565 34,917 240,516 (77,049)75.74% Debt Service Payments 0 25,739 75,480 75,480 0.00%(3) Total Expenses 3,973,495 782,470 4,512,170 538,675 113.56% (1) Interest Earnings are allocated at year-end. (2) Depreciation is allocated at year-end and. (3) Debt service payments will be reimbursed by TIF. City of Golden Valley Monthly Budget Report - Storm Utility Enterprise Fund October, 2017 (unaudited) 2017 Equipment Replacement Fund (CIP) - Fund 5700 2017 October YTD Budget Total Actual Remaining Revenues: Proceeds - Certificate of Indebtedness 800,000 0 852,665 52,665 Sale of Assets 35,000 0 81,473 46,473 Miscellaneous 0 0 4,396 4,396 Interest Earnings (allocated at year end)28,831 0 0 (28,831) Total Revenues 863,831 0 938,534 74,703 Expenditures: Program #Project Number Project Name 5700 Bond Expenditures 0 0 8,476 (8,476) 5701 V&E-001 Marked Squad Cars (Police)80,000 300 155,064 (75,064)(3) (1)5702 V&E-002 Computers and Printers (Finance)105,000 1,951 56,420 48,580 V&E-021 Vibratory Asphalt Roller (street)45,000 0 41,847 3,153 5762 V&E-026 Pickup Truck (Park)40,000 0 29,660 10,340 5760 V&E-037 Aerial Ladder (Fire)400,000 0 54,459 345,541 V&E-038 Streetscape Banners (Street)25,000 13,489 13,469 11,531 5747 V&E-070 Single Axle Dump Truck (Street)225,000 0 219,258 5,742 V&E-073 Sidewalk Snowblower (Street)110,000 0 0 110,000 5786 V&E-083 Passenger Vehicle (Fire)40,000 0 32,089 7,911 5757 V&E-099 Asphalt Hot Box (Street)45,000 0 30,737 14,263 V&E-108 Unmarked Police Vehicle (Police)40,000 3,475 7,400 32,600 5771 V&E-120 Field Line Painter 20,000 0 14,565 5,435 V&E-121 Tasers (Police)16,000 0 0 16,000 V&E-126 Tack Sprayer (Street)60,000 0 65,171 (5,171) 5746 V&E-128 Utility Tractor (Park)105,000 0 101,241 3,759 V&E-130 Rotary Mower (Park)25,000 0 0 25,000 V&E-135 Body Cameras/Dash Cams/Software (Police)220,000 0 0 220,000 (2) V&E-150 Asset Management Software 60,000 0 0 60,000 Total Expenditures 1,661,000 19,215 829,856 551,144 (1) Computers are replaced every 4-5 years and purchased throughout the year based on available time. (2) In 2016, a transfer was made to the equipment replacement fund to purchase video dash cams and body cameras together. (3) Marked Squads include a replacement for a squad that was totaled in 2017. Over 2017 October YTD (Under)% Budget Actual Actual Budget Current Revenue Brookview CC Rentals 20,000 0 2,976 (17,024)14.88% Backyard Play Area 50,450 0 0 (50,450)0.00% Miscellaneous Revenues 5,500 0 0 (5,500)0.00% Interest on Investments 4,000 0 0 (4,000)0.00%(1) Total Revenue 79,950 0 2,976 (76,974)3.72% Expenses: General Area Rooms 167,715 1,428 20,457 (147,258)12.20%(2) Indoor Play Area 54,875 500 3,638 (51,237)6.63%(3) Banquet Facility 63,360 6,675 22,229 (41,131)35.08%(3) Total Expenses 285,950 8,603 46,324 (239,626)16.20% (1) Interest Earnings are allocated at year-end. (2) Staff Time/Supplies for Community Center Rental (3) Advertising costs for CVB brochure plus 1/2 Banquet Manager City of Golden Valley Monthly Budget Report - Brookview Center Special Revenue Fund October 2017 (unaudited) 2017 Buiiding Improvement Fund (CIP) - Fund 5200 2017 October YTD Budget Total Actual Remaining Revenues: Transfer from General Fund 300,000 300,000 300,000 0 Interest Earnings (allocated at year end)3,260 0 0 (3,260) Total Revenues 303,260 300,000 300,000 (3,260) Expenditures: Project Name Carpet Replacement-City Buildings 50,000 0 29,765 20,235 Installation of Building Security Systems 50,000 0 28,730 21,270 (1)Vehicle Maintenance Window Replacement 15,000 0 0 15,000 Furniture - City Buildings 50,000 0 29,873 20,127 Total Expenditures 165,000 0 88,368 76,632 2017 Park Improvement Fund (CIP) - Fund 5600 2017 October YTD Budget Total Actual Remaining Revenues: Transfer from General Fund 250,000 0 250,000 0 Park Dedication Fee 0 0 0 0 Hennepin County Youth Sports Grant 100,000 0 100,000 0 Three Rivers Park District 325,000 0 325,000 0 Little League/Youth Associations/Play Eq Grants 118,500 0 18,500 (100,000) Other Donations 0 6,454 21,454 21,454 Golden Valley Community Foundation 0 35,000 35,000 35,000 Interest Earnings (allocated at year end)5,390 0 0 (5,390) Total Revenues 798,890 41,454 749,954 (48,936) Expenditures: Project Name Bleacher Replacement 25,000 0 28,111 (3,111) Park Trail and Parking Lot Imrprovements 30,000 20,105 28,705 1,295 (1)Play Structure Replacement 170,000 50 588,474 (418,474)(1) Ball Field Lighting 360,000 809 207,479 152,521 Outdoor Basketball and Hoop Replacement 28,000 11,752 19,574 8,426 Park Signage Replacement 10,000 0 10,622 (622) Sun Shelter Replacement/Additions 25,000 0 13,380 11,620 Tennis & Pickle Ball Court Resurfacing 32,000 0 5,500 26,500 Brookview Entrance Sign Replacement 50,000 0 0 50,000 Sidewalk Connection 25,000 0 0 25,000 Total Expenditures 755,000 32,716 901,845 (146,845) (1)Three Rivers Park Grant for Schaper Park Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting November 21, 2017 Agenda Item 4. A. Public Hearing - Redevelopment Plan for Douglas Drive Corridor Redevelopment Project Area Prepared By Marc Nevinski, Physical Development Director Summary Proposed modifications to the Redevelopment Plan for the Douglas Drive Corridor Project Area reflected an anticipated land use change for a parcel along the corridor. A formal application for this change was submitted, however, the application was recently withdrawn. Subsequently, the Redevelopment Plan, as drafted, does not conform to the City’s current land use plan and revisions must be made before the Redevelopment Plan is adopted. Because a legal notification for this public hearing was published in the SunPost on November 9, the public hearing should be opened and continued to the December 5, 2017, Council meeting. Recommended Action Motion to open and continue the public hearing for the Redevelopment Plan for the Douglas Drive Corridor Redevelopment Project Area to the December 5, 2017, City Council meeting. Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting November 21, 2017 Agenda Item 4. B. Public Hearing - Amendment to the General Land Use Plan Map - 1111 Douglas Drive Prepared By Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager Summary The applicant has withdrawn the application for this proposal. A legal notification for this public hearing was published in the SunPost on November 9, 2017, so in order to follow proper procedures the public hearing must be opened and closed at today’s meeting. Recommended Actions Motion to open and close the public hearing amending the General Land Use Plan Map for 1111 Douglas Drive. Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting November 21, 2017 Agenda Item 4. C. Public Hearings - Approval of Conditional Use Permit and Amendments to the Official Zoning Map and the General Land Use Plan Map - 5508 Olson Memorial Highway Prepared By Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager Summary The applicant has withdrawn the applications for these proposals. Legal notifications for these public hearings were published in the SunPost on November 9, 2017, so in order to follow proper procedures the public hearings must be opened and closed at today’s meeting. Recommended Actions Motion to open and close the public hearings approving a Conditional Use Permit and amending the General Land Use Plan Map and Official Zoning Map for 5508 Olson Memorial Highway. Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting November 21, 2017 Agenda Item 4. D. Public Hearings - Approval of a Major PUD Amendment and Amendments to the Official Zoning Map - 701 Lilac Drive North Prepared By Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager Summary The applicant has withdrawn the applications for these proposals. Legal notifications for these public hearings were published in the SunPost on November 9, 2017, so in order to follow proper procedures the public hearings must be opened and closed at today’s meeting. Recommended Actions Motion to open and close the public hearings approving a Major PUD Amendment and amending the Official Zoning Map for 701 Lilac Drive North. Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting November 21, 2017 Agenda Item 4. E. Public Hearing - Establishing a Tax Increment Financing (Redevelopment) District - Tennant World Headquarters within the Douglas Drive Redevelopment Project Area Prepared By Marc Nevinski, Physical Development Director Summary The applicant has withdrawn the application for this proposal. A legal notification for this public hearing was published in the SunPost on November 9, 2017, so in order to follow proper procedures the public hearing must be opened and closed at today’s meeting. Recommended Actions Motion to open and close the public hearing on establishing a tax increment financing (redevelopment) district - Tennant World Headquarters within the Douglas Drive Redevelopment Project Area. Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting November 21, 2017 Agenda Item 6. A. Support Future Bus Rapid Transit Service on Highway 169 and Highway 55 in accordance with the Highway 169 Mobility Study Prepared By Jeff Oliver, City Engineer Emily Goellner, Associate Planner/Grant Writer Summary The Highway 169 Mobility Study was initiated by Scott County, MnDOT, and Metropolitan Council in 2015 to evaluate the potential for Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) and MnPASS Highway Express Travel Lanes in the southwest metropolitan area. Golden Valley is included in the study since the BRT routes studied were along Highway 55 and I-394 between Downtown Minneapolis and Highway 169. Highway 169 also runs along the western boundary of Golden Valley. Transit and MnPASS lanes were studied in order to understand how congestion could be reduced in the future while improving safety, providing more transportation choices, and increasing access to jobs and destinations in the study area (see map of study area attached). Two BRT routes were selected for detailed study and analysis. Alternative 1 runs along I-394 with stops at General Mills Boulevard, Louisiana Avenue, and Park Place/Xenia Avenue. This route would have a faster travel time through the corridor due to fewer stations and stoplights. The projected overall ridership for this route is slightly higher than Alternative 2. Alternative 2 runs along Highway 55 with stops at General Mills Boulevard, Winnetka Avenue, Douglas Drive, and Theodore Wirth Parkway in Golden Valley. The route also included stops in Minneapolis at Penn Avenue and 7th Street before entering Downtown Minneapolis. This route would serve more residents and employment centers than Alternative 1. It would also serve more transit-dependent persons and reverse-commute riders. The estimated cost of the two alternative routes is relatively the same. The draft 2040 Comprehensive Plan supports increased transit options and provides opportunities for redevelopment in the town center/downtown area of Golden Valley as well as along Douglas Drive. Both of these areas intersect with the Highway 55 BRT route in this study, so it is consistent with the community’s long-term vision for the City. St. Louis Park staff and City Council agreed in their work session in September 2017 that the Highway 55 route would provide more transit options for St. Louis Park, Golden Valley, and other western suburban communities since I-394 is well served by express bus service today. The consultant hired for this project, SRF Consulting, Inc., is currently working on an evaluation of funding opportunities and a timeline for implementation. Transportation funding the federal, state, and regional levels of government is in high demand. This project is not yet listed in the Metropolitan Council’s 2040 Transportation Policy Plan (TPP), which is required in order to receive federal and regional funding for implementation. This study is the first step toward that goal. Attachments • Resolution Supporting Future Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Service on Highway 169 and Highway 55 in Accordance with the Highway 169 Mobility Study (2 pages) • Map of Study Area (1 page) Recommended Action Motion to adopt Resolution supporting future Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Service on Highway 169 and Highway 55 in accordance with the Highway 169 Mobility Study. Resolution 17-72 November 21, 2017 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION SUPPORTING FUTURE BUS RAPID TRANSIT (BRT) SERVICE ON HIGHWAY 169 AND HIGHWAY 55 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HIGHWAY 169 MOBILITY STUDY WHEREAS, the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT), the Metropolitan Council, and Scott County funded and participated in the US Highway 169 Mobility Study, in partnership with cities and counties along the corridor, to evaluate the potential for MnPASS Express Lanes in the southwest metro area on Highway 169, and Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) in the same corridor from the city of Shakopee north to corridors connecting to downtown Minneapolis; and WHEREAS, the purpose of the project, as established through the study process, is to increase access to jobs and destinations, provide transportation choices, and improve safety and travel time for Highway 169 travelers; and WHEREAS, two (2) BRT alternatives were identified and studied: US 169 from Marschall Road north to Betty Crocker Drive (segment common to both alternatives) and east to downtown Minneapolis via I-394 (Alternative 1) or via Highway 55 (Alternative 2); and WHEREAS, the evaluation of BRT alternatives shows strategic differences between the two alternatives: Alternative 1 serves a higher number of jobs along the corridor and has higher total projected ridership, Alternative 2 serves a higher number of people living along the corridor, has higher projected transit-dependent and reverse-commute ridership, and connects to the future METRO Blue Line light rail extension; and WHEREAS, six (6) project goals for evaluation of alternatives were established through the study process and both BRT alternatives similarly satisfy each of the project goals: Improve Access, Provide Improved Mobility, Attract Ridership, Provide a High Return on Investment, Prioritize Service to Transit-Supportive Development Areas, and Preserve the Environment; and WHEREAS, the project evaluation also shows that the addition of MnPASS lanes on Highway 169 between Marschall Road and Highway 55 is feasible and would satisfy the project goals by improving access to jobs and destinations, improving mobility by reducing and better managing congestion, providing a transit advantage for express bus service and in some areas BRT service, providing a high long-term return on investment, and preserving the environment; and WHEREAS, staff and elected officials from the City of Golden Valley have thoughtfully participated in the Highway 169 Mobility Study; and WHEREAS, it is understood that the current financial constraints of the region for highway and transit expansion projects beyond what are already assumed to be funded in the Transportation Policy Plan are challenging, but should additional funding become available, this project should be given due consideration for advancement in part or total. Resolution 17-72 -2- November 21, 2017 NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that, the City of Golden Valley recommends support of future BRT service on Highway 169 connecting to downtown Minneapolis via Highway 55 (Alternative 2) and MnPASS Lane additions on Highway 169 including future planning studies and infrastructure or transit investment to enable and support implementation. THEREFORE BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, the City of Golden Valley requests the Metropolitan Council and MnDOT incorporate, prioritize, and consider these MnPASS and BRT improvements in plans, programs and projects. _____________________________ Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: _____________________________ Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by the City Clerk. Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), MapmyIndia, NGCC, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community Ma r s c h a l l R d Ca n t e r b u r y R d Louisiana Ave Park Place Pioneer Trail Hopkins Viking Dr / Washington Ave Cedar Lake Rd General Mills Bren Rd Southbridge Crossing Wi n n e t k a A v e N Do u g l a s D r Th e o d o r e W i r t h P k w y Pe n n A v e 7th S t Downtown Minneapolis He n n e p i n A v e Nic o l l e t M a l l 7th St Hawthorne Ave 7th St Transit Center 3rd A v e Legend In-line station Off-Line station Proximity to Existing Park and Ride Blue Line (LRT) and Stations Green Line (LRT) and Stations Orange Line (BRT) Shared alignment for BRT & Hwy 169 MnPASS BRT alignment for Alternative 1 BRT alignment for Alternative 2 012340.5 Miles . P P P P P P P Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting November 21, 2017 Agenda Item 6. B. First Consideration - Ordinance #627 - Establishing A 2018 Master Fee Schedule Prepared By Sue Virnig, Finance Director Summary First consideration of the master fee schedule will be presented by staff at this meeting. Most of the changes were reviewed when the council reviewed sections of the budget at council manager meetings. This schedule shows the approved rates for 2017 and notes the changes to 2018 rates by using bold or highlighted sections. The utility rates will be effective for any billing after April 1, 2018. The second consideration will be December 5, 2017. Attachments • Ordinance #627, Establishing A 2018 Master Fee Schedule (17 pages) Recommended Action Motion to adopt on First Consideration, Ordinance #627, Establishing A 2018 Master Fee Schedule. ORDINANCE NO. 627, 2ND SERIES AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE Establishing A 2018 Master Fee Schedule The City Council for the City of Golden Valley hereby ordains: Section 1. The City Code requires that certain fees for City services and licenses be established from time to time by the City Council. Section 2. The Master Fee Schedule is hereby adopted as the city’s fee schedule effective January 1, 2018, unless otherwise noted and shall be added to Chapter 25 of the City Code. The fee schedule is on file in the City Clerk’s Office during business hours. Section 3. City Code Chapter 1 entitled “General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation” is hereby adopted in its entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 4. This ordinance shall take effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law. Adopted by the City Council this 21st day of November, 2017. /s/Shepard M. Harris Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: /s/Kristine A. Luedke Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk 2017 Adopted 2018 Proposed Fee Fee Permits If the work has been started the Building Official shall assess additional fees as permitted by code All building permit valuation data will be based on the current International Code Council Plan Review Fee May Be Due at time Plans are Submitted at City Discretion 65% of Fee 65% of Fee Building & Fire Permit Fees based on fee schedule below. Mandatory State Surcharge: per permit is a minimum of .50 and when a permit fee is over $1,000 in value the state surcharge is .0005 times the permit value. Surcharge is remitted to MN State Treasurer. Permit Cancellation Policy: 80% of the permit fee will be returned upon written notice of cancellation. If job has been started no refund will be made. Cancellation request must be made within 180 days of permit issue date. No surcharge or plan review fees will be returned (includes the fees for stormwater management, right-of-way (ROW) and tree preservation permits). Building/Fire/Commercial Mechanical Plan Review Fee - 65% of the permit fee (no surcharge) re-inspection fee 100.00 100.00 Sewer Access Charge (SAC)650 per Unit 650 per Unit Water Access Charge (WAC)1,700 per Unit 1,700 per Unit SAC & WAC Charges shall be based on the Residential Equivalent Connection Units (REC) resulting from the use of the City Water/Sewer systems. The REC shall equal the number of SAC Units determined under the SAC Determination to which the building permit relates. Administrative 75.00 75.00 Seasonal, Farm Produce, Christmas Tree Sales, etc in Commercial Zoning District Electrical State Surcharge - each permit 1.00 1.00 All Services new, replace or repair There is a $2 per circuit charge for replacing circuits that are disconnected in the old service panel and reconnected in the new panel. 0 to 300 Amp 50.00 400 Amp 58.00 500 Amp 72.00 600 Amp 86.00 800 Amp 114.00 1000 Amp 142.00 1100 Amp 156.00 1200 Amp 170.00 Add $14.00 for each additional 100 Amps. Circuits and Feeders The inspection fee for the installation, addition, alteration or repair of each circuit, feeder, feeder tap or set of transformer secondary conductors: 0 to 30 Amp 8.00 31 to 100 Amp 10.00 101 to 200 Amp 15.00 300 Amp 20.00 400 Amp 25.00 500 Amp 30.00 600 Amp 35.00 700 Amp 40.00 Add $5.00 for each additional 100 Amps. Minimum Fee Minimum permit fee is $40.00 plus $1.00 State surcharge. This is for one inspection only. Minimum fee for rough-in inspection and final is $80.00 plus $1.00 State surcharge. Maximum Fee Maximum fee for single family dwelling or townhouse not over 200 Amps is $175.00 plus $1.00 State surcharge. Maximum of 3 inspections. City of Golden Valley 2018 Proposed Master Fee Schedule - Exhibit A 1 2017 Adopted 2018 Proposed Fee Fee Permits (continued) Electrical (continued) Apartment Buildings Fee per unit of an apartment or condominium complex. This does not cover $80 per unit $80 per unit service and house wiring. Swimming Pool $80.00 This includes 2 inspections Additons, Remodels or Basement Finishes $80.00 This includes up to 10 circuits and 2 inspections Accessory Structures $50.00 for panel plus $8.00 per circuit Traffic Signals $7.00 per each standard Street Lights and parking lot lights $4.00 per each standard Transformers and Generators $10.00 - up to 10 KVA, $40.00 - 11 to 74 KVA, $60.00 - 75 KVA to 299 KVA, $150.00 - over 300 KVA Retro Fit Lighting $.65 per fixture Sign Transformer $8.00 per transformer Remote Control and Signal Circuits $.75 per device Reinspection fee $40.00 Fire Alarm System (New Installation or Alteration of Existing) Up to the 1st $1,200 in value 50.00 50.00 Over $1,200 value - use fire suppression fee Fire Commercial Cooking Ventilation Systems (hood and duct cleaning) Inspection 75.00 75.00 Re-inspection 150.00 150.00 Fire Suppression & Special Fire Suppression Systems: FM 200 system, CO2 systems, spray booths, kitchen extinguisher systems, hoods, etc. Total valuation based on below fee schedule: 2004 LMC/AMM Recommendation $150 $500 $25.00 $501 $2,000 $25.00 for the first $500 $3.25 / additional $100 $2,001 $25,000 $73.50 for the first $2,000 $14.75 / additional $1,000 $25,001 $50,000 $415.75 for the first $25,000 $10.75 / additional $1,000 $50,001 $100,000 $682.50 for the first $50,000 $7.50 / additional $1,000 $100,001 $500,000 $1,053.50 for the first $100,000 $6.00 / additional $1,000 $500,001 $1,000,000 $3,427.75 for the first $500,000 $5.00 / additional $1,000 $1,000,001 and up $5,945.25 for the first $1,000,000 $4.00 / additional $1,000 Fireworks/Pyrotechnic Special Effects 100.00 100.00 Permit requires rental of fire engine and crew for stand-by at display House/Building Moving 500.00 500.00 Demolition 500.00 500.00 Value Range City of Golden Valley 2018 Proposed Master Fee Schedule - Exhibit A 2 2017 Adopted 2018 Proposed Fee Fee Permits (continued) Mechanical: HVAC, Gas Piping, Refrigeration and Fireplace (Includes all types of fireplaces - masonry, gas, gas log, gas insert, etc.) $0 -$999 $25.00 $1,001 -$5,000 $31.50 + 2.60% over $1000 $5,001 -$10,000 $135.50 + 2.15% over $5000 $10,001 -$25,000 $243.00 + 1.85% over $10,000 $25,000 -$50,000 $520.50 + 1.65% over $25,000 $50,001 -over $933.00 + 1.30% over $50,000 State Surcharge is $.50 for a Value of $1,000 or Less. If the Value is over $1,000 the State Surcharge is (Value X .0005). Mobile Food Vending Non-residential zoning districts Up to 3 days (City Parks - limit 3 days)$40 per day $40 per day Up to 120 days 150.00 150.00 Native Vegetation Landscape Permit 100.00 100.00 Parade/Special Event 25.00 25.00 Petroleum/Compress Gas Tanks Installation - per dispenser 75.00 75.00 Installation - per tank 75.00 75.00 Piping associated with tanks 75.00 75.00 Removal - per tank 75.00 75.00 Temporary LP Tank (per site)75.00 75.00 Temporary above ground fuel tanks (per site)75.00 75.00 Plan Review Fee -65% of the fee (no surcharge) Plumbing and Piping Fixtures Includes hydraulic sewer valves, rain water leaders, and alteration to existing systems. $0 -$999 $25.00 $1,001 -$5,000 $31.50 + 2.60% over $1000 $5,001 -$10,000 $135.50 + 2.15% over $5000 $10,001 -$25,000 $243.00 + 1.85% over $10,000 $25,001 -$50,000 $520.50 + 1.65% over $25,000 $50,001 -over $933.00 + 1.30% over $50,000 State Surcharge is $.50 for a Value of $1,000 or Less. If the Value is over $1,000 the State Surcharge is (Value X .0005). Right Of Way Driveway Replacement Permit 100.00 100.00 Permanent Obstruction Permit, per obstruction (includes courtesy benches)100.00 100.00 Temporary Obstruction permit No Charge No Charge Temporary Access Permit 25.00 25.00 In Boulevard Excavation Permit per opening 100.00 100.00 In Pavement Excavation Permit per opening (includes curb alterations)200.00 200.00 Overhead Utility Repair per location No Charge No Charge Underground Utility: Length Permit Charge 0 to 100 Feet $250 administrative fee + $1/foot over 100 Feet $350 administrative fee + $.50/foot over 100 feet Service Drop meeting conditions:No charge No charge Not parallel to right-of way at least 10' from any City facility or utility, less than 1' wide, and depth in accord with law or, if none, industry standard Permit charge Permit charge City of Golden Valley 2018 Proposed Master Fee Schedule - Exhibit A Value Value 3 2017 Adopted 2018 Proposed Fee Fee Permits (continued) Stormwater Management Projects that do not require watershed review - No post construction BMPs 100.00 100.00 Projects that require watershed review require Post Construction BMPs 300.00 300.00 Sign Permit Base fee 50.00 50.00 Area fee (per sq ft of sign area)+3.00/sq ft +3.00/sq ft Plan Review (Pylon and Monument Signs)40.00 40.00 Temporary Certificate of Occupancy Partial Certificate of Occupancy (Administrative Fee)100.00 100.00 Temporary Certificate of Occupancy (Administrative Fee)100.00 100.00 Extension of Temporary Certificate of Occupancy (Administrative Fee)200.00 200.00 Penalty for expired Temporary Certificate of Occupancy 300.00 300.00 Tent/Canopy Inspections - required for tent exceeding 400 sq ft and 50.00 50.00 canopies exceeding 700 sq ft (per site) each additional tent and/or canopy (per site)25.00 25.00 Tree and Landscape Permit 150.00 150.00 Utility Permits Water Meter Permit 100.00 100.00 Water Tapping Permit 100.00 100.00 Water Cut-off Permit 100.00 100.00 Sewer Permit (connection)100.00 100.00 Sewer Repair Permit 100.00 100.00 Sewer Cut-off Permit 100.00 100.00 Sewer & Water Permits for Commercial Projects (Fee Based on Plumbing Value and if there is a Plan the Plan Review Fee would be 65% of the Fee) State Surcharge - each permit 1.00 1.00 Licenses Renewal Date Auctioning Auctioneers do not need to be licensed in the City of Golden Valley. However, they have to show us a copy of a license or bond from the county or state and provide us a letter on the date, time and place of the auction. Chicken Coop License Initial Application Fee 75.00 75.00 Annual License Renewal Fee 1-Apr 25.00 25.00 Cigarettes - Tobacco Products over the counter 1-Jan 275.00 275.00 Contractors - Heating, Ventilation, Air Cond and Refrigeration 1-Apr 75.00 75.00 Dog Kennel - per kennel 1-Apr 200.00 200.00 Entertainment Amusement and Shows 1-Apr 50.00 50.00 (movies - per screen; caravans, circuses, amusement rides) Bowling Alley (each lane)1-Apr 15.00 15.00 Dancing & Entertainment 1-Apr 375.00 375.00 Pinball Machine, Video Game or Pool Table each location 1-Apr 15.00 15.00 each device 1-Apr 15.00 15.00 City of Golden Valley 2018 Proposed Master Fee Schedule - Exhibit A 4 2017 Adopted 2018 Proposed Fee Fee Licenses (continued) Renewal Date Fireworks Retail consumer fireworks that sell other items 1-May 100.00 100.00 Retail consumer fireworks, retailers that sell only fireworks 1-May 350.00 350.00 Garbage Haulers - per vehicle 1-Apr 50.00 50.00 (See also Recylcing Haulers) Gasoline Stations Per Location Dispensers 1 - 4 (each)1-Apr 75.00 75.00 Over four dispensers (each)50.00 50.00 Lawful Gambling License 1-Jan First year 250.00 250.00 Renewal after 1st year 100.00 100.00 Liquor License Application Packet 20.00 20.00 Liquor - Investigation Fee (Liquor On-sale, Off-sale, and Sunday sale and Wine)new applicant 3,000.00 3,000.00 $500.00 non-refundable administrative fee plus actual costs for investigation Liquor - Miscellaneous Change thru the year per change 100.00 100.00 Liquor On, Off and Sunday Sale and Wine (renewal or misc changes) Liquor License (State law) Sunday sale 1-Jul 200.00 200.00 Off-sale 340A.408 1-Jul 200.00 200.00 On-sale 1-Jul 8,000.00 8,000.00 Wine On-sale 1-Jul 2,000.00 2,000.00 Club 1-Jul up to 200 members 300.00 300.00 200-500 members 500.00 500.00 501-1,000 members 650.00 650.00 1,001-2,000 members 800.00 800.00 2001-4000 members 1,000.00 1,000.00 4001-6000 members 2,000.00 2,000.00 Over 6000 members 3,000.00 3,000.00 Liquor - On-sale 1-Jul Non-Intoxicating Malt 500.00 500.00 Brewer Tap Room 600.00 600.00 Cocktail Room 600.00 600.00 Liquor - Off-sale 1-Jul Non-Intoxicating Malt 150.00 150.00 Brew Pub - Malt Liquor 200.00 200.00 Small Brewer 200.00 200.00 Distilled Spirits 200.00 200.00 Liquor - Temporary Non-Intoxicating/Intoxicatng Malt Liquor License Section 5.31-City Code 100.00 100.00 Liquor- Investigation Fee 500.00 500.00 Massage Therapist - Individual Certificate (each individual/person)1-Jan 100.00 100.00 Investigation fee 100.00 100.00 City of Golden Valley 2018 Proposed Master Fee Schedule - Exhibit A 5 2017 Adopted 2018 Proposed Fee Fee Licenses (continued) Renewal Date Massage Therapist Premise License 1-Jan Operating location 500.00 500.00 Investigation fee 200.00 200.00 New/Used Vehicle Sales 1-Sep 400.00 400.00 Peddlers and Solicitors 1-Jan Each Employee (background check /Identification card)30.00 30.00 Pawnbroker and Precious Metal Dealer Location 1-Jan 5,000.00 5,000.00 Dealer 1-Jan 400.00 400.00 Investigation Fee 3,000.00 3,000.00 $500.00 non-refundable administrative fee plus actual costs for investigation APS Transaction Fee 1.30 1.30 Recycling Haulers (Multi Family Apartment) - per vehicle 1-Apr 50.00 50.00 Rental Dwelling License Single Family Dwellings One Unit Dwelling License Expires July 1 125.00 125.00 Re-inspection 100.00 100.00 Twin Homes & Duplexes License per Dwelling Unit Expires May 1 125.00 125.00 Re-inspection (per unit/per address)100.00 100.00 Condominiums & Townhomes License Per Dwelling Unit Expires Sept 1 125.00 125.00 Re-inspection (per unit/per address)100.00 100.00 Group Homes / homes with services Expires Nov 1 125.00 125.00 License Per Dwelling Unit Re-inspection (per unit/per address)100.00 100.00 Multiple Unit Dwelling (3 or more units) per building 1-Mar 3 - 50 Units 175.00 175.00 51 - 150 Units 225.00 225.00 151 + Units 300.00 300.00 Re-inspection (per building/per address)100.00 100.00 Star Program Fees (Based on participation level) Non-Participant $35/unit $35/unit Level 1 $20/unit $20/unit Level 2 $12/unit $12/unit Level 3 $8/unit $8/unit Level 4 $0/unit $0/unit Administrative Citations on (all) Rental Dwellings 1st citation 100.00 100.00 2nd citation 250.00 250.00 3rd citation 500.00 500.00 4th citation and subsequent violations in 12 month period 500.00 500.00 Citation Appeal 25.00 25.00 Sexually Oriented Business License Fee (operating location)1-Jan 5,000.00 5,000.00 Investigation Fee 3,000.00 3,000.00 $500.00 non-refundable administrative fee plus actual costs for investigation City of Golden Valley 2018 Proposed Master Fee Schedule - Exhibit A 6 2017 Adopted 2018 Proposed Fee Fee Street Assessments Residential/Single Family/Duplex, per dwelling unit on local street 6,600.00 6,900.00 Multi Unit Residential (more than 2 dwelling units) on local street 76.3/ft 76.3/ft Residential/Single Family/Duplex, per dwelling unit on state aid street 1,650.00 1,650.00 Multi Unit Residential (more than 2 dwelling units) on state aid street 81.71/ft 81.71/ft Other Zonings, Local Streets 91.73/ft 96.31 Other Zonings, State Aid Streets 99.21/ft 99.21/ft Administrative Fee for Driveways and/or Sanitary Sewer repairs $250/maximum $250/maximum (Seven percent of total or maximum fee -whichever lessor) Low Income Level for Senior/Retired due to Disability Deferral 2016 HUD Limits 2016 HUD Limits When a project does not follow the above assessment rates, the rates will be approved at the time of the project hearing. Miscellaneous Fees Address Change 50.00 50.00 Administrative Citations - Non Rental Housing 1st Citation 100.00 100.00 2nd Citation 250.00 250.00 3rd Citation 500.00 500.00 4th Citation and subsequent violations in 12 month period 500.00 500.00 Alarm System - False Alarms (12 month period beginning March 1 of each year upon given notice) 1-3 false alarms 4-10 false alarms 100.00 100.00 11-15 false alarms 150.00 150.00 16 or more false alarms 250.00 250.00 Animal Control Impound Fee for dogs 50.00 50.00 Boarding Fee for dogs and cats per day (7 day maximum)20.00 20.00 Dangerous Dog License 250.00 250.00 Building Plan/Storage Retrieval 50.00 50.00 Carseat Installations/Inspections Non-resident 20.00 20.00 Each additional 10.00 10.00 Certification Fee (Special Assessment)30.00 30.00 City Cemetery Cemetery Plot 500.00 500.00 Open/Close Fee: Crematory (up to 2 per lot)200.00 each 200.00 each Burial 750.00 750.00 Documents City Code Full book in binder 200.00 200.00 Updates 15/each 15/each Zoning Chapters Only 10.00 10.00 City Maps:, Plats, Record Drawings, Other Plats (i.e. address maps, building plans,comp plan, zoning)10.00 10.00 Comprehensive Plan Copies of any black and white, letter or legal size documents of 100 or .25/pg .25/pg fewer pages (Minnesota Rules, part 1205.0300, subpart 4.) Copies of any color, letter or legal size documents .33/page .33/page Digital Format Aerial photography time & material time & material Custom Maps or Map Layers time & material time & material Topography time & material time & material City of Golden Valley 2018 Proposed Master Fee Schedule - Exhibit A 7 2017 Adopted 2018 Proposed Fee Fee Miscellaneous Fees (continued) Documents (continued) Special Assessment Search (non-owner)15.00 15.00 Video Reproduction (per tape, DVD, CD + shipping)20.00 20.00 Domestic Partner Registration Initial Registration 40.00 40.00 Amendment/Notice of Termination 25.00 25.00 Certified copy of Registration 5.00 5.00 Equipment Charge per hour Fire Engine (includes personnel)250.00 250.00 Fire Aerial Truck (includes personnel)350.00 350.00 Police and Fire Rescue Truck (includes personnel)250.00 250.00 Utility Vehicle (includes personnel)100.00 100.00 Squad Car (includes personnel)100.00 100.00 Utility Equipment (sewer jet, vac truck, sewer camera, sewer rodder)200.00 200.00 Heavy (front end loader, 360 Backhoe, Pickup sweeper,125.00 125.00 tandem axle truck, aerial truck)does not include personnel costs Medium (single axle dump truck, water truck, tractor backhoe, utility tractor/80.00 80.00 accessory, 15 ft cut lawn mower, brush chipper, asphalt roller, asphalt paver, skid steer, tool cat, trackless) does not include personnel costs Light (truck - one ton and under, air compressor, water pump, generator,45.00 45.00 steamer, asphalt/saw, concrete, cable tracer) does not include personnel costs Fire Boat (includes personnel)75.00 75.00 Fire ATV (includes personnel)75.00 75.00 Fire Life Safety Trailer (includes personnel)200.00 200.00 Gas Lines, construction damage with Fire Department Response 250.00 250.00 Floor Dry (Accidents)20.00/bag 20.00/bag Filing Fee (Administrative Citation Appeal) per violation 25.00 25.00 Fingerprinting Golden Valley Resident 10.00 10.00 Anyone employed in GV 25.00 25.00 Additional Card Forced Tree Removal cost of cost of removal + 20%removal + 20% Forfeited DWI Vehicle Administrative Fee 1000.00 1000.00 Hydrant Meter Rental Residential (per day + consumption)2.00 2.00 Commercial (per day + consumption)5.00 5.00 Commercial (rate per day after 60 days + consumption)10.00 10.00 Deposit (residential)300.00 300.00 Deposit (commercial)1750.00 1750.00 Nuisance Service Call Fee (after three calls)250.00 250.00 Personnel Off Duty Police Officer (minimum applies as determined by 75 / hr 75 / hr City Manager/designee) Full-time Fire Personnel 75 / hr 75 / hr Paid On-Call Fire Personnel 35 / hr 35 / hr Public Works Employee 62 / hr 62 / hr 2018 Proposed Master Fee Schedule - Exhibit A City of Golden Valley 8 2017 Adopted 2018 Proposed Fee Fee Miscellaneous Fees (continued) Sump Pump Inspection 50.00 50.00 Weed Eradication/Lawn mowing - per hour (see minimums) Occupied/unoccupied residential/commercial property - 3 hour minimum 125 / hr 125 / hr SECOND OR MORE VIOLATIONS IN ONE SEASON Occupied/unoccupied residential/commercial property - 3 hour minimum 250 / hr 250 / hr Planning & Zoning Fees Comprehensive Plan Amendment 500.00 1,000.00 Conditional Use Items Conditional Use Permit 400.00 400.00 Amendment to Conditional Use Permit 300.00 300.00 Extension for Conditional Use Permit 125.00 125.00 Easement Vacation (each request)500.00 500.00 Flood Control Management (Special Permit)75.00 75.00 Floodplain Search Letter 25.00 25.00 Park Dedication Fees 6% of Land 6% of Land (per Minnesota Statute 462.358) Planned Unit Development Preliminary Design Plan 600.00 1000.00 Final Plan of Development 600.00 1000.00 Extension of Planned Unit Development 150.00 150.00 Planned Unit Development Major Amendment 400.00 500.00 Planned Unit Development Minor Amendment 250.00 250.00 Planned Unit Development - Administrative Amendment 100.00 100.00 Rezoning 500.00 500.00 Subdivision 400.00 400.00 Extension to Submit Final Plat 125.00 125.00 Subdivision - Minor 250.00 250.00 Extension to Submit Final Plat 125.00 125.00 Variance from City Code - Zoning Chapters Single family residential 200.00 200.00 Extension 150.00 150.00 All others 300.00 300.00 Extension 150.00 150.00 Wetland Management (plus professional fees if necessary)75.00 75.00 Zoning Examination Letter 100.00 100.00 Temporary Retail Sales in Industrial Zone 150.00 150.00 (for each sale, up to five days) City of Golden Valley 2018 Proposed Master Fee Schedule - Exhibit A 9 2017 Adopted 2018 Proposed Fee Fee Utility Fees Driveway Covers - Replace 150.00 150.00 Hydrant Inspection (Private)3.75 / month 3.75 / month Hydrant Maintenance (Private)Actual Cost materials, parts, labor + 20% admin Actual Cost materials, parts, labor + 20% admin Meter Testing (to be returned if meter is in error of 5% or more of read)50.00 50.00 Sanitary Sewer Inspections and Compliance Fees (Ordinance No. 352) Noncompliant discharge into sanitary sewer(or refuse inspection) Single Family Residential 500 / month 500 / month Non Single Family Residential 1000 / month 1000 / month Application fee for noncompliant winter discharge into sanitary sewer 250.00 250.00 Application fee for certificate of sewer regulations compliance Single Family Residential (R-1 or R-2), per structure 250.00 250.00 Non Single Family Residential (all other structures), per structure 750.00 750.00 Fee to review residential video record completed by private licensed plumber 100.00 100.00 Fee to review non-residential video record completed by private licensed plumber 375.00 375.00 Water on/off per each event (business day)25.00 25.00 (after hours)175.00 175.00 Utility - Manual Read of Water/Sewer Meter 100.00 100.00 Water Meter and Parts (All)At cost +20%At cost +20% Utility Billing Rates - Effective April 1, 2017 4/1/2017 4/1/2018 Residential Utility Rates - quarterly billing (includes all residential classes except those classified as apartments) Inspection Fee for Fire lines 6.00 6.00 Penalties (for late payment)10%10% Sanitary Sewer (in 1000 gallons) Residential (per dwelling unit) (Flat Rate)- 5 and under units-winter qtr consumption 62.15 67.74 Residential (per dwelling unit) (Flat Rate) - 6-15 units-winter qtr consumption 67.11 73.15 Residential (per dwelling unit) (Flat Rate) - 16-19 units-winter qtr consumption 73.82 80.46 Residential (per dwelling unit) (Flat Rate) - 20-25 units-winter qtr consumption 84.15 91.72 Residential (per dwelling unit) (Flat Rate) - 26-39 units-winter qtr consumption 110.25 120.17 Residential (per dwelling unit) (Flat Rate) - 40-59 units-winter qtr consumption 126.96 138.39 Residential (per dwelling unit) (Flat Rate) - 60-79 units-winter qtr consumption 134.76 146.89 Residential (per dwelling unit) (Flat Rate)- 80 to 99 units-winter qtr consumption 154.41 168.31 Residential (per dwelling unit) (Flat Rate)- 100 and over units-winter qtr consumption 183.26 199.75 Recycling Residential curbside (per unit)14.00 14.00 Storm Sewer Utility Rate Charge for a Residential Equivalent Factor of 1.00 68.00 72.00 Each single family residential property is considered to be 1/3 of an acre. City of Golden Valley 2018 Proposed Master Fee Schedule - Exhibit A 10 2017 Adopted 2018 Proposed Fee Fee Utility Billing Rates - Effective April 1, 2017 (continued)4/1/2017 4/1/2018 Residential Utility Rates - quarterly billing Street Lights Ornamental (per unit)11.61 12.06 Overhead (per unit)8.00 8.31 Water Minimum fee, includes up to 1,000 gallons of flow 11.00 13.50 Water meters up to and including 1"11.00 13.50 Water meters over 1" and including 2"75.78 90.00 Water meters over 2" and including 4"105.81 125.91 Water meters over 4"134.94 160.58 Above 1,000 gallons of flow per quarter up to 79,000 (per 1,000 gallons)6.00 6.30 80,000 gallons and over of flow per quarter (per 1,000 gallons)6.03 6.33 Emergency Water Supply (per 1,000 gallons of flow)Eff 11-1-16 0.30 0.30 Water Connection Fee (State Charge for each water hookup)1.59 1.59 Irrigation Accounts (All) - Monthly Billing Minimum fee, includes up to 1,000 gallons of flow 11.00 13.50 Water rate per 1000 gallons 6.03 6.33 All apartment buildings over 50 units will be billed monthly beginning April 1, 2018 Commercial & Industrial Utility Rates - monthly billing Inspection Fee for Fire lines 2.00 2.00 Penalties (for late payment on monthly billings)5%5% Sanitary Sewer Water meters up to and including 1"9.60 10.56 Water meters over 1" and including 2"24.60 27.06 Water meters over 2" and including 4"34.16 37.58 Water meters over 4"43.80 47.74 Based on per 1,000 gallons 4.45 5.05 Note: Water Meter Flow is used to establish sewer flow unless a separate sewer flow meter has been established. Storm Sewer Utility Rate Charge per acre for property X Residential Equivalency Factor (REF)68.00 72.00 Street Lights Ornamental (per unit)3.87 4.02 Overhead (per unit)2.67 2.77 Water Connection Fee (State Charge for each water hookup)0.53 0.53 Water Usage: Minimum fee, includes up to 1,000 gallons of flow 11.00 13.50 Water meters up to and including 1"11.00 13.50 Water meters over 1" and including 2"26.25 30.00 Water meters over 2" and including 4"35.27 41.97 Water meters over 4"44.98 53.53 Water rate per 1000 gallons 6.00 6.33 Emergency Water Supply (per 1,000 gallons of flow)0.30 0.30 City of Golden Valley 2018 Proposed Master Fee Schedule - Exhibit A 11 2017 Adopted 2018 Proposed Fee Fee Brookview Golf Course Rates Regulation Course 18 Hole Non-patron 37.00 39.00 18 Hole Patron 30.00 32.00 18 Hole Sr Patron 26.00 28.00 18 Hole Non-patron Senior Rate (Age 60+)30.00 32.00 18 Hole Non-patron League (Age 60+)37.00 39.00 18 Tournament 37.00 39.00 9 Hole Non-patron 20.00 21.00 9 Hole Patron 17.00 18.00 9 Hole Sr Patron 15.50 16.50 9 Hole Non-patron Senior (Age 60+)17.00 18.00 9 Hole Non-patron League (Age 60+)20.00 21.00 9 Hole Tournament 20.00 21.00 2nd Nine Non-patron 17.00 18.00 2nd Nine Patron 13.00 14.00 Sunrise/Sunset Rate 17.00 18.00 Twilight Non-patron 21.00 22.00 Twilight Patron 17.00 18.00 Junior Rate Patron 22.50/12.50 23.50/13.50 Junior Rate Non Patron 24.50/14.50 25.50/15.50 Par 3 Course 9 Hole Non-patron 12.50 13.00 9 Hole patron 9.00 9.50 9 Hole Sr Patron (Age 60+)8.00 8.50 9 Hole Non-patron Senior Rate (Age 60+)9.50 10.00 9 Hole League 12.50 13.00 9 Hole Tournament 12.50 13.00 9 Hole Junior Rate 8.00 8.50 9 Hole Junior Non-Patron Rate 9.50 10.00 2nd 9 Par 3 7.50 8.00 Patron Cards Resident Adult Patron 75.00/70.00 80.00/75.00 Non-resident Adult Patron 115.00/110.00 120.00/115.00 Resident Senior Patron (age 60+)45.00/40.00 50.00/45.00 Non-resident Senior Patron (age 60+)80.00/75.00 85.00/80.00 Resident Junior Patron (17 yrs & under)35.00/30.00 40.00/35.00 Non-resident Junior (17 yrs & under)40.00/35.00 45.00/40.00 Par 3 Patron Card 30.00 35.00 Driving Range Warm Up Bucket 4.00 4.00 Small Bucket 6.00 6.00 Large Bucket 8.00 8.00 10 Bucket Punch Pass 67.00 67.00 Large Patron Bucket 6.00 6.00 Cart Rates 18 Hole Power Cart 32.00 32.00 18 Hole Tournament Cart 32.00 32.00 18 Hole Patron Cart 26.00 26.00 9 Hole Tournament Cart 21.00 21.00 9 Hole Power Cart 21.00 21.00 9 Hole Par 3 Power Cart 16.00 16.00 Pull Cart/Regulation Course 5.00 5.00 Pull Cart/Par 3 Course 4.00 4.00 Trailer fee/Use of personal power cart 15.00/10.00 15.00/10.00 City of Golden Valley 2018 Proposed Master Fee Schedule - Exhibit A 12 2017 Adopted 2018 Proposed Fee Fee Brookview Golf Course Rates (continued) Club Rentals 18 Hole full rental - Regulation 20.00/30.00 20.00/30.00 9 Hole full rental - Regulation 10.00/15.00 10.00/15.00 9 hole Par 3 half rental 10.00 10.00 Locker Rental Season 20.00 100.00 Daily 1.00 5.00 Towel fee 2.00 2.00 Miscellaneous Fees USGA Handicap Service MGA Non-patron 40.00 45.00 Patron Annual 25.00 30.00 No Show Fee FULL FEE FULL FEE Lessons Adult Group 99.00 99.00 Junior Group 65.00 65.00 Lawn Bowling League Fee M-Th evenings (7 week league)350.00 400.00 Single Court Rental - resident and golf patron 20.00/hour 25.00/hour Single Court Rental - non-resident 25.00/hour 30.00/hour Private Rental of Four Courts 100.00/hour 120.00/hour Private Rental of Eight Courts - exclusive use 200.00/hour 240.00/hour Summer Kids Leagues 10.00-50.00 30.00 Senior Leagues 10.00-50.00 5.00 Rental of Green / 4 courts for corporate golf outings 100.00/hour 120.00/hour Game Official For Private Rentals / Events 25.00/hour 30.00/hour Game Equipment Use For Leagues & Rentals included included Park & Recreation Fees Rates/Fees are printed in Recreation Brochures (Spring/Summer, Fall, Winter) Youth Activities Youth Programs 5.00-150.00 Youth Trips/Events 5.00-75.00 Youth Athletics 20.00-100.00 Adult Activities Adult Sports Cancelation Service Fee 40.00 Adult Programs 5.00-150.00 Adult Trips/Events 5.00-75.00 Adult Athletics 20.00-100.00 Open Gyms 4.00 10-time Punch Pass 30.00 Soccer League - Co-Rec 425.00-550.00 Softball Leagues - Fall 400.00-500.00 Softball Leagues - Spring/Summer 800.00-900.00 Volleyball League 150.00-300.00 Senior Programs / Activities Coffee Talk 2.00 Craft/Art Classes 6.50-70.00 Membership Dues 5.00-8.00 Special Events 4.00-40.00 Trips - Extended 2-6 Days 250.00-1200.00 Trips - One Day 8.00-95.00 2018 Proposed Master Fee Schedule - Exhibit A Drop-in Fee City of Golden Valley 13 2017 Adopted 2018 Proposed Fee Fee Park & Recreation Fees (continued) Other Park & Recreation Fees Picnic Shelter Damage Deposit 250.00 250.00 Small Park Shelter (up to 50 people) Resident 100.00 100.00 Non-resident 115.00 115.00 Large Park Shelter (up to 100 people) Resident 130.00 130.00 Non-resident 150.00 150.00 Entire Park Use -- plus facility rental fees (up to 12 hours) Resident 250.00 250.00 Non-resident 450.00 450.00 Brookview Gazebo (Available from 11:00 am - dusk and only in conjunction with Large Shelter Rental for wedding ceremonies.) Resident per hour 50.00 50.00 Non-resident per hour 75.00 75.00 Beer/Wine Permit (only with Picnic Shelter rental)30.00 30.00 Party Equipment Use Fee Permit (inflatable, dunk tank, etc)Each 25.00 25.00 Davis Community Center Gym Resident per hour 25.00 25.00 Non-resident per hour 30.00 30.00 Sand Volleyball Court (per court) Resident per hour 20.00 20.00 Non-resident per hour 35.00 35.00 Tennis or Pickleball Court Tournament - per day/per court Resident 40.00 50.00 Non-resident 50.00 60.00 Court/hr/wkday Resident per hour 6.00 6.00 Non-resident per hour 8.00 8.00 Athletic Field Resident per hour / per field 25.00 Non-resident per hour / per field 40.00 Resident - no attendent per hour / per field (min 2 hrs)20.00 Resident - with attendent per hour / per field (min 2 hrs)35.00 Non Resident - no attendent per hour / per field (min 2 hrs)35.00 Non Resident - with attendent per hour / per field (min 2 hrs)50.00 W/Lights with attendent per hour / per field 10.00 Resident per hour / per filed 40.00 Non-resident per hour / per filed 55.00 All day tournament Resident per field / per day 150.00 150.00 Non-resident per field / per day 300.00 300.00 Field Attendant per hour 15.00 15.00 Professional Photo/Video Use of Specific Park Area (plus facility rental fees) Resident per hour 100.00 100.00 Non-resident per hour 125.00 125.00 Park Shelter Building Resident per hour (minimum 2 hrs)35.00 35.00 Non-resident per hour (minimum 2 hrs)40.00 40.00 Key Deposit refundable when returned 25.00 City of Golden Valley 2018 Proposed Master Fee Schedule - Exhibit A 14 2017 Adopted 2018 Proposed Fee Fee Park & Recreation Fees (continued) Hockey Rink Resident per hour 25.00 25.00 Non-resident per hour 35.00 35.00 Youth Athletic Association Player Field Maintenance Fee Resident per person 8.00 Non-resident per person 10.00 Organization Field Maintenance Fee per organization 100.00-2000.00 Maintenance Fee per player 7.00-15.00 Invitational Tournament per field per day 50.00 BACKYARD INDOOR PLAYGROUND Daily Rates Resident 4.00 4.00 Non-Resident 5.00 5.00 Socks 2.00 2.00 10 Punch Pass - Resident 30.00 30.00 10 Punch Pass - Non-Resident 40.00 40.00 Party Rates Includes 2 hours party room and 10 indoor playground wristbands - extra wristbands may be purchased for daily rate (max of 20 people total per party room) Resident 100.00 100.00 Non-Resident 120.00 120.00 Private Backyard Indoor Playground Rental Includes 2 hours of exclusive use and 2 party rooms Resident 250.00 250.00 Non-Resident 280.00 280.00 Additional hour 100.00 100.00 Group Rates Pre-reservation required; Ratio of 10:1 youth/adult; 1 payment only Groups of 15 kids or more per child 4.50 4.50 Picnic Packages Three One SIx Grill will provide food package options for party groups. City of Golden Valley 2018 Proposed Master Fee Schedule - Exhibit A 15 2018 Proposed Fee City of Golden Valley 2018 Proposed Master Fee Schedule - Exhibit A BROOKVIEW COMMUNITY CENTER - 2018 Proposed DEPOSIT Deposit is due at time of booking to hold reservation. $500 refundable damage deposit is due 2 weeks prior to rental. All rentals include:Set-up / take-down and AV equipment RESIDENT (Live or work in GV, book 24 months in advance for 14 hr, 12 months in advance for hourly) Room Room Capacity Hours Sweeney Lake Conference Rm -12 max 2 hr min North 50 – seated chairs only 2 hr min South Waiting for #2 hr min Both Waiting for #2 hr min Twin Lake Rm -4 No minimum Fossil Creek Rm -4 No minimum Hideout -20 – seated at tables 2 hr min Clubhouse -20 – seated at tables 2 hr min Room Option Capacity Hours Mon-Thur Fri Sat Sun Bassett Creek 212 (200 @ rounds, 12 head table)14 hr (10 am-12 am)-$900 $1,200 $700 Banquet Room 228 (216 @ rectangles, 12 head table)Hourly (2 hr min)$75/hr $80/hr $100/hr $75/hr North 84 (72 at rounds & 12 at head table)Hourly (2 hr min)$55/hr $60/hr $80/hr $55/hr South 72 (Classrm/presentation at rectangles)Hourly (2 hr min)$55/hr $60/hr $80/hr $55/hr Lilac Room -No minimum Wirth Lake Rm - Waiting for #2 hr min Rice Lake Conference Rm -12 max 2 hr min Evergreen Deck -104 – seated chairs only 2 hr min 204 – seated chairs only 2 hr min Deck Event/Ceremony Fee (set-up of chairs, equipment, basic PA) Special Set-up Varies based on needs NON-RESIDENT (Book 18 months in advance for 14 hr, 8 months in advance for hourly) Room Option Capacity Hours Sweeney Lake Conference Rm -12 max 2 hr min North 50 – seated chairs only 2 hr min South Waiting for #2 hr min Both Waiting for #2 hr min Twin Lake Rm -4 No minimum Fossil Creek Rm -4 No minimum Hideout -20 – seated at tables 2 hr min Clubhouse -20 – seated at tables 2 hr min Room Option Capacity Hours Mon- Thur--Fri Sat Sun Bassett Creek 212 (200 @ rounds, 12 head table)14 hr (10 am-12 am)-$1,100 $1,400 $900 Banquet Room 228 (216 @ rectangles, 12 head table)Hourly (2 hr min)$90/hr $95/hr $115/hr $90/hr North 84 (72 at rounds & 12 at head table)Hourly (2 hr min)$70/hr $75/hr $95/hr $70/hr South 72 (Classrm/presentation at rectangles)Hourly (2 hr min)$70/hr $75/hr $95/hr $70/hr Lilac Room -No minimum Wirth Lake Rm - Waiting for #2 hr min Rice Lake Conference Rm -12 max 2 hr min Evergreen Deck -104 – seated chairs only 2 hr min 204 – seated chairs only 2 hr min Deck Event/Ceremony Fee (set-up of chairs, equipment, basic PA) Special Set-up Varies based on needs 14 hour rental includes: Bassett Creek Banquet Room, Lilac room, catering kitchen, private (Fairway) deck. Fairway Deck - $90/hr -$220 $50 minimum Full Rm $15/hr $60/hr $35/hr $90/hr $15/hr $15/hr $35/hr $35/hr Upper Level Lower Level Mon-Sun $35/hr Valley Room $60/hr $60/hr $90/hr Fairway Deck - $75/hr -$200 $50 minimum Full Rm $15/hr $50/hr $25/hr $75/hr $15/hr $15/hr $25/hr $25/hr Upper Level Lower Level Mon-Sun $25/hr Valley Room $50/hr $50/hr $80/hr 16