The URL can be used to link to this page

02-12-18 PC Agenda AGENDA Planning Commission Regular Meeting Golden Valley City Hall, 7800 Golden Valley Road Council Chambers Monday, February 12, 2018 7 pm 1. Approval of Minutes November 13, 2017, Regular Planning Commission Meeting November 27, 2017, Special Planning Commission Meeting December 11, 2017, Special Planning Commission Meeting January 8, 2018, Special Planning Commission Meeting 2. Informal Public Hearing — Minor Subdivision — 1017 Ravine Trail — SU09-14 Applicant: Tom Hunt & Linda McCracken-Hunt Address: 1017 Ravine Trail Purpose: To reconfigure the existing single family residential lot into two new single family residential lots. 3. Informal Public Hearing —Zoning Code Text Amendment— Mixed Income Housing — ZO00-114 Applicant: City of Golden Valley Purpose: To consider the addition of Mixed Income Housing language to various sections of the Zoning Code --Short Recess-- 4. Reports on Meetings of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority, City Council, Board of Zoning Appeals and other Meetings 5. Other Business • Comp Plan Discussion — Land Use and Transportation • Council Liaison Report • Planning Articles 6. Adjournment Tllis docunient is availal�le in altect�ate fori7�ats upoi�a 72-1jour request. Ple�se calE 7b3-593-�006(T7Y; 763-593-3968}to make a request, Examples of aBternate forn�ats ' ' may include large print,eleetronic, Bra€Ile,audiocassette,ete. �.. ��. ♦ Regular Meeting of the Golden Valley Planning Commission November 13, 2017 A regular meeting of the Planning Commission was held at the Golden Valley City Hall, Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota, on Monday, November 13, 2017. Vice Chair Johnson called the meeting to order at 7:19 pm. Those present were Planning Commissioners Black, Blum, Johnson, Segelbaum and Waldhauser. Also present were Finance Director Sue Virnig, Planning Manager Jason Zimmerman, and Administrative Assistant Lisa Wittman. Commissioners Baker and Blenker were absent. 1. Approval of Minutes October 9, 2017, Special Planning Commission Meeting MOVED by Waldhauser, seconded by Segelbaurn and motion carried unanimously to approve the October 9, 2017, Special Planning Commission minutes as submitted. October 23, 2017, Regular Planning Commissian Meeting Johnson said he wanted it noted that he thinks Tax lncrement Financing (TIF) discounts the value of Golden Valley. MOVED by Waldhauser, seconded by Segelbaum and motion carried 3 to 1 to approve the October 23, 2017, Regular Planning Commission minutes as submitted. Commissioner Blum abstained. 2. Presentation of Capital improvement Program 2018-2022 — Sue Virnig, City Finance Director Virnig noted that the sections in the CIP include vehicles and equipment, parks, Brookview Golf Course, buildings (general buildings and cablecasting), storm water utility, water and sanitary sewer, streets, and the appendix. Virnig highlighted some of the projects from each section of the CIP including: a new fire pumper, lighting at Isaacson Park with funding from a Hennepin County Youth Sports Grant, tennis court construction at Wesley Park, community gardens in 2019 and 2021, an off-leash dog park, a new restaurant and pro shop along with other amenities at Brookview Community Center, a City Hall boiler replacement, carpet replacement in the second floor hallway of City Hall, remodeling of the Council Chambers, projects that will reduce flooding in the Decola Ponds area, sanitary sewer replacement and maintenance coinciding with the Pavement Management Program, additional flashing yellow arrows, and bike trails per the Bicycle and Pedestrian task force recommendations. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission November 13, 2017 Page 2 Black asked how certain the City is that it will receive grant money. Virnig stated that the City received a grant for lighting at Isaacson Park in the past and is hoping to get another one in the future. Segelbaum asked if anything has been significantly delayed due to funds being short. Virnig stated that the 2020-2021 Pavement Management Program will have to be extended to 2021 through 2023. Blum thanked staff for the work that has gone into the CIP and asked if the Planning Commission is supposed to do a constructive review of the plan or just confirm that it is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Virnig stated that the Planning Commission's role is to review the plan and state whether it is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan or not. Zimmerman added that the Planning Commission will have more opportunity to provide oversight as the 2040 Comprehensive Plan is implemented. Waldhauser asked if there is flexibility in funding sewer replacement and maintenance differently. Virnig stated that the City may have to consider an additional franchise fee as an alternate funding source. Black noted that some of the funds are being dep:teted and asked if that is a normal trend. Virnig explained several of the funds and explained that the funds are looked at every year for a five year period. Blum said he struggles with understanding how the average citizen can digest this plan. He said it would be useful to hig'hlight issues that the City has received feedback on and to show that those issues are being translated into budget items. Virnig stated that the Communications Department could highlight the infrastructure plan and further discuss Tax Increment Financing. Zi,mmerman suggested that CityNews articles tie back to the Comprehensive Plan and the CI'P and how it all works together. Johnson referred to the joint commission meeting held in January regarding infrastructure needs and goals and stated that his take away from that meeting was that the City would need almost double the money for infrastructure projects. Now when he looks at this CIP it doesn't loak like there is enough money dedicated to infrastructure. Virnig referred to the Pavement Management Program and the infrastructure plan that looks at infrastructure further into the future. Blum said he was happy to hear that the City is getting away from bond financing and said that seems more fiscally responsible to him. Virnig stated that she worries about levy limits being brought back and the possibility of municipal bonds being taxable. Waldhauser questioned how cities can generate funds moving forward and questioned if there are ways other than levies to generate funds such as using a sales tax. Virnig stated that the City would have to go to the legislature to implement a sales tax. Blum noted that a lot of important expenditures are funds and said he thinks the City doesn't take advantage of some of its green infrastructure. He suggested that it might be Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission November 13, 2017 Page 3 worthwhile to create a special fund for greenery and trees because it would cost less to have green infrastructure. He added that one of the most heard comments in the city survey was green issues and being good environmental stewards so he thinks it would be a service to the citizens to have a budget item for green infrastructure. Virnig noted that the Environmental Commission follows through on a lot of the "green" issues. She stated that there are several green items spread throughout the CIP they just aren't in one section. Waldhauser agreed that calling out the green items and making it more visible is a good idea and sometimes a cheaper way to do some thi;ngs. Waldhauser asked if narrower streets, curb bump-outs, and rain gardens are considered during the pavement management projects. Zimmerman stated that those things among others are considered whenever possible. Johnson referred to page 92 and asked about the item regarding 1.5 miles of rehab on Winnetka Avenue. Virnig explained that project is lining the water mains from Medicine Lake Road to Highway 55 in conjunction with a CenterPoint_project. Blum referred to the Janalyn Pond lift station project and questioned if there might be ways to mitigate needing a pump there with less expensive plantings and if the City would be better served by looking at solutions that will cost less money in the long term. Virnig said she would have to defer to the City Engineer about what alternatives there might be. Johnson referred to page 108 and questioned the three major expenditures regarding Xenia Avenue and Golden HiIIs Drive. Virnig stated that Xenia Avenue and Golden Hills Drive improvements are paid for through assessments. Blum referred to page 72 and nated that it looks like the City is paying $500,000 for carpet replacement. Virnig stated that this is in draft form and will be changed. Black asked if i# is less expensive for the City to provide for a large development or a small development. Virnig stated that not every development needs assistance from the City so it really depends on the project. Johnson stated that as the City offers TIF it foregoes the tax revenue and increases the use of the infrastructure. Zimmerman stated that the City misses out on the tax value for a certain time but without TIF the City might not have gotten some of the developments at all. Virnig added that commercial properties help with the City's fixed costs and job creation and#'hat the City reaps the benefits of the building permits so there is so much more that these developments bring to the City. Waldhauser questioned if there should be something in the CIP about the new community center. Virnig stated that the community center is part of the General Fund and Special Other Funds. She added that it is a special revenue fund and that they will pay their expenditures. 4 M Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission November 13, 2017 Page 4 Blum referred to the Cable Commission and noted that cities are paying millions of dollars to keep the local TV station going when there are perhaps other tools that are more cost effective and will reach more people. He asked if any thought has been given to phasing that out. Virnig noted that Council Member Clausen is a representative on the Cable Commission and that they have many statistics about the viewership. She added that there is a franchise fee for the cable equipment and that tax dollars are not used. Waldhauser added that many residents watch the cable TV channel programs and meetings that are televised. MOVED by Waldhauser, seconded by Segelbaum and motion carried unanimously to recommend approval of the 2018-2022 Capital Improvement Program as it is consistent with the goals and policies of Golden Valley's Comprehensive Plan'. --Short Recess-- 3. Reports on Meetings of the Housing and Redevelopment Aufihority, City Council, Board of Zoning Appeals and other Meetings Zimmerman stated that Tennant has withdrawn afl of their recently submitted planning applications. Zimmerman stated that a new Planning Commissioner has been appointed and will be attending the next Planning Commission meeting. 4. Other Business • Council Liaison Report Schmidgall stated that Globus Development came to the last City Council meeting and presented the assisted living component of the project which will be a real asset to the community. Schmidgall stated that the grand opening for Brookview is December 1. 5. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 8:31 pm. Ron Blum, Secretary Lisa Wittman, Administrative Assistant Special Meeting of the Golden Valley Planning Commission November 27, 2017 A special meeting of the Planning Commission was held at the Golden Valley City Hall, Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota, on Monday, November 27, 2017. Vice Chair Johnson called the meeting to order at 7 pm. Those present were Planning Commissioners Black, Blenker, Blum, Brookins, Johnson, Segelbaum, and Waldhauser. Also present were Planning Manager J�son Zimmerman and Associate Planner/Grant Writer Emily Goellner. Commissioner Brookins was sworn in by Vice Chair Johnson_` 1. Comp Plan Work Session — Resilience and Sustainability Zimmerman gave a recap of the Comprehensive Plan process, what had been done to date, and the anticipated schedule for review and approval of the �040 Comp Plan through the rest of 2017 and into 2018. Goellner introduced the draft Resilience and Sustair�ability chapter and mentioned that one challenge was to balance the language in tt�e document between the aspirational and the pragmatic. Segelbaum recommer�ded that staff be`selective about where to use stronger language in the plan. Segelbaum asked about the tirning of#he public comment period for the 2040 Comp Plan. Blum suggested that an apen-ended suruey could be a good way to garner more responses during the comrnent period. Zimmerman said that the Communications staff would provide a variety of ways for community members to provide input during the public comment period in 2018. Johnson suggested that the introduction of each chapter include an outline or bulleted list of the main poin#s or key takeaways from the chapter. The list could potentially include what is new, differenfi, ar actionable since the last Comp Plan update. Blum stated he hoped there were ways to achieve the goals and objectives without having to resort to trade-offs, such as accommodating both solar energy and enhanced vegetatiar� by placing solar panels on commercial-industrial properties and trees in residential neighborhoods, for example. Waldhauser said that perhaps "green" policies should be implemented to the same degree as required storm water regulations. Blum wondered if Goal 4 (Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment) should be moved to be Goal 1 since he felt this was the top priority of those who responded to the Community Survey and who attended the Comp Plan open houses. Goellner replied that the Environmental Commission, who drafting the chapter text, had other reasons for putting Clean Energy as Goal 1, but that she would inquire with the staff liaison for the Environmental Commission about this idea. P Special Meeting of the Golden Valley Planning Commission November 27, 2017 Page 2 Blenker asked about the City's policies for converting turf to native plantings. Blum said he would be interested in tying more financial incentives to the Goals of the Plan, including fining property owners who do not remove invasive species from their yards. He also worried that showing the City's tree canopy coverage at 40% while indicating that the healthy level is only 30% might provide future justification for an increase in tree removals. Brookins asked if there should be additional mention of homes and buildings as infrastructure in the Built Environment section of the Existing Conditions. Segelbaum asked if resiliency/sustainability pays for itself or if the City needs to be tying mvre money to these improvements. Waldhauser stated that studies have linked examples of green or sustainable practices to increased community health. The Commissioners pointed out the challenge in addressing aspects of sustainability that are also covered in other chapters of the Plan. Zimmerman st�ted that some"of these overarching relationships could be explored further in th� introductory chapter. 2. Comp Plan Work Session — Parks and Natural Reso`urc�s Zimmerman introduced the Parks chapter and m�ntioned sc�me of the comments that had been submitted regarding edits, including rewriting Goal 4 (Grow Brookview Golf and Recreation Area) to separate golf activities from other �menities. He also noted that comments included piacing more emphasis on passive recreation due to its importance to residents. Zimmerman added that camments were received about revisiting the calculations for the ratio of acres of parkland ta number of residents. Waldhauser noted that neighborhood parks are well spread out in the community. Zimmerman stated that the trail system should continue connecting neighborhood residents to community and regional parks within the City. Blum stated that he would like the plan to go further with exploring ways to support or enhanGe th� park system with private funds (naming rights, sponsorships, etc.). Waldhauser noted the importance of native species, but asked whether the City Forester and ather staff are aware of which native species are truly sustainable in the long term. The meeting was adjourned at 8:40 pm. Ron Blum, Secretary Lisa Wittman, Administrative Assistant Special Meeting of the Golden Valley Planning Commission December 11, 2017 A special meeting of the Planning Commission was hetd at the Golden Valley City Hall, Council Conference Room, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota, on Monday, December 11, 2017. Chair Baker called the meeting to order at 7 pm. Those present were Planning Commissioners Baker, Black, Blenker, Blum, Brc�okins, Johnson, Segelbaum, and Waldhauser. Also present were Planning Manager Ja�on Zimmerman and Associate Planner/Grant Writer Emily Goellner. 1. Comp Plan Work Session — Land Use Zimmerman reviewed the schedule for completing the Comprehensive Plan update and pointed out that the early part of 2018 would be spent re�iewing draft chapters of the plan. He summarized some of the feedback he had received r��arding the land use plan, including concerns that it was hard to capture all of the areas of the City where passive and active open spaces uses mixed on the s�me parcels. One solution would be to generalize all of the open space on the Future Land Use Map and allow the individual park plans to specify locations for passive uses. Baker emphasized that it was important to recognize the passive use area sa that they were not assumed to be unimportant and would be protected as future changes toc�k place. Others agreed and Zimmerman said he would look at additional ways to rnake this point in the chapter. Zimmerman displayed changes that had been made to the land use plans since the last conversation in October. Gaellner pointed out a few areas along Highway 100 that were excess highway right-of-way properties and needed to be guided for future uses other than right-of-way. All kaut one were targeted to be low intensity residential. The property at 300 Turners Cr�ssroad was lar�e enough that there were potentially options for other uses there. The Commissioners discussed the possibility of preserving the area as open space, using it for single family homes, or building attached housing. All agreed a broader community engagernent process should be used to get the input of the neighborhood to the west. Staff di�cussed a potential redevelopment project at 2445 Winnetka Avenue and suggested the proposed medium intensity residential use might be a better option than the commercial use that had previously been discussed. Zimmerman presented an effort to distinguish between "neighborhood" and "community" level flex use/mixed use nodes on the plan. Goellner reviewed some revised land use categories that distinguished between the two and asked for feedback. Zimmerman pointed out which nodes were being targeted for neighborhood-level activity and which were marked for community-level activity. He also reviewed a chart showing the preferred housing/job breakdown within each area. . . Special Meeting of the Golden Valley Planning Commission December 11, 2017 Page 2 Questions were asked about how the zoning would work to support the vision of the land use plan. Staff described some ideas, including targeting specific uses for the two scales of mixed use development, utilizing site design standards that are already in the I-394 Mixed Use district, and creating a Pedestrian Overlay to help encourage good design and exclude auto-oriented uses such as gas stations along certain road corridors. Goellner pointed out that all of the mixed use nodes were in areas where redevelopment was either likely or encouraged to occur. Blum asked if there would be more detailed plans for any of the areas in order to guide redevelopment. Zimmerman noted that the four Planning Districts on the draft Land Use Plan would be described for planning purposes, but there would also be more detailed descriptions for small areas or specific parcels within the Districts. He also discussed a few opportunities for further planning, including money in the 2018 City budget to create a plan for the downtown and work being done around the Golden Valley Road light rail station as part of the Bz�ftineau Community Works project at Hennepin County. Blum expressed some concerns that the mixed use nodes were too s�gregated and that perhaps larger areas should be designated as mixed use in order to allow better coordination. Zimmerman reminded the Commissioners that fhe four Planning Districts that were initially discussed would provide guidance, but that there`were many properties where change was not being encouraged. Blum said he was not convinced that the industrial properties that were being preserved were as valuable as he was being led to believe, and that there may be greater value in seeing them redevelop. Blenker said she was worried there was not enough residential density proposed to support the amount or retail that the Commissioners indi�ated they wanted. Baker suggested that the Commission and staff continue tt� seek expert feedback from sources such as the Urban Land Institute for the City's planning purposes. Goellner added that experts at the last feedback session with Urban Land Institute noted that revitalization of the existing Golden Valley Shopping Center holds significant opportunities and that it is beneficial to keep that property guided for commercia! use. 2. Comp Plan Work Session'— Transportation Goellner displayed some of the maps that were generated as part of the work on the Transportation chapter, including a functional classification map and maps showing the projected levels of congestion on roads in Golden Valley in 2040 based on population growth and the draft land use plan. She also discussed the Highway 169 Mobility Study and'what it might mean for future bus rapid transit along Highway 55. The meeting was adjourned at 8:52 pm. Ron Blum, Secretary Lisa Wittman, Administrative Assistant Special Meeting of the Golden Valley Planning Commission January 8, 2018 A special meeting of the Planning Commission was held at the Golden Valley City Hall, Council Conference Room, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota, on Monday, January 8, 2018. Chair Baker called the meeting to order at 7 pm. Those present were Planning Commissioners Baker, Black, Blenker, Blum; Jt�hnson, Segelbaum, and Waldhauser. Also present were Council Member Rasenquist, Planning Manager Jason Zimmerman, Associate Planner/Grant Writer Emily Goellner, and Jay Demma and Mike Lamb representing the consulting team for Hennepin County Community Works. Commissioner Brookins was absent. 1. Hennepin County Community Works — TOD Zoning Study Update Zimmerman introduced Demma and Lamb and gave a brief background of the work being done in association with the METRO Blue Line E�cfension project fQr Hennepin County Community Works. Demma introduced the TOD Zoning Study and provided some of the highlights of the work completed to date with respect to drafting zoning tools for use in the Golden Valley Road station area. Segelbaum asked about the timing of producing new zoning language. Baker said it needed to be coordinated with the adoption of the new Comprehensive Plan. Zimmerman said it would likely follow the Comp Plan update by no more than nine months. Blum asked about the target density for a redevelopment site in the station area. Demma replied that the Metropolitan Cauncil's requirements are for 25 units per acre but higher densities are encouraged. Qaker asked about the feasibility of development and if commercial uses would be suppor�ed. Zimmerman replied that a Commercial Market Study was being conducted as part of the consultant's work and that this question would be addressed. Black ask�d ab�ut the current net density of the station area once parks and open space were subtracted. C?emma said the report would provide that information. Demma said the next steps would be to conduct a workshop with staff and then to meet again with'the Planning Commission and City Council. Rosenquist cautioned that the neighborhoods around the Golden Valley Road station had been very engaged in past discussions and wanted to be sure that this process would be sensitive to their concerns. 2. Comp Plan Work Session — Housing Goellner introduced the Housing chapter and pointed out some of the main points in the updated chapter, including new themes of affordable housing preservation, accommodation of senior housing, and greater energy efficiency. She stated that the 2040 plan has been drafted to be much more forward thinking compared to the 2030 plan, Special Meeting of the Golden Valley Planning Commission January 8, 2018 Page 2 which was focused on preservation of the existing housing stock. Although there is market demand for many types of housing in Golden Valley, there is not enough space to build it all so the City will need to choose where it wants to focus. Seagelbaum asked how the Commission should attempt to balance all of the competing goals. Baker said he thought it was important to be specific about priorities and then understand what you are willing to forego. Johnson pointed out that in addition to limitations associated with land and resources, there are also limitations in City services and staff. Johnson said he was surprised by the high percentage of homes in Gt�lden Vall�y that are cost burdened. Segelbaum supported the plan to establish regu(ar staff meetings to discuss housing issues. Baker wondered if"disinvested" or vacant properties are a concern. Zimmerman outlined the process that the City uses to addres$ property maintenance issues, including the use of Administrative Citatinns. Waldhauser wondered if utility use tracking could be used to help determine when a hame is vaeant. Blum asked if there could be more transparency regarding resident complaints about these properties and attempts to have them resolved. He said he believes it should be possible for the City to provide information about specific addresses. Baker agreed that the City should follow the law with respect to releasing data, but also wanted staff to protect the privacy of individuals when pc�ssible. Seagelbaum asked if the goals and c�bjectives were too aggressive and if the City could accomplish them all. Goellner r�plied that there was a fair amount of pressure to take immediate action, particularly on affardable housing. Waldhauser asked if it would be possible to quantify some c�f the costs associated with the actions. Blum referred to the on-line questions posed as part of the Comp Plan process and reminded the Commission thaf being "green," clean, safe, and multi-modal were all priorities. Baker cautioned that on-Iine surveys can be biased and should not be taken as a representation of the entire community. Johnson asked if sustainability could also include economic equity. Black asked if the goals were being written in a way that they could be used to deny a proposed PUD or TIF district if the City did not feel they were appropriate, or if they were too vague. Blum asked if the City really was interested in researching Accessory Dwelling Units or if this had already been discussed and rejected. Zimmerman reminded the Commission that a recent zoning text amendment prohibiting accessory units was specific to Temporary Health Care Dwellings as defined by the State. The Commission agreed that language in the implementation plan about accessory dwelling units shoutd be clarified. The meeting was adjourned at 8:47 pm. Special Meeting of the Golden Valley Planning Commission January 8, 2018 Page 3 Ron Blum, Secretary Lisa Wittman, Administrative Assistant CZ��1 C1� �� Planning Department 763-593-8095/763-593-8109(fax) ; ��-::,� ,�� , � �� ,;��- H �� ,�..� . ��: , �,, .:. .... � , ,� r ,..., >...... .....� „ _,.... � � x 3 ,,, � Date: January 22, 2018 To: Golden Valley Planning Commission From: Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager Subject: Informal Public Hearing on Preliminary Plan for Minor Subdivision of 1017 Ravine Trail —Tom Hunt and Linda McCracken-Hunt, Applicants �� _. . ._�. .. � k��. �� ,... � a ,, �, �_� � , Summary of Request Tom Hunt and Linda McCracken-Hunt, represented by David Knaeble, are proposing to subdivide the property located at 1017 Ravine Trail into two lots. There is one existing single family home on this lot, which would remain, and a new lot would be created for a potential second home. Changes to the minimum lot area requirement of the Subdivision Code made in 2015 require a calculation of the average lot size of all residential lots within 250 feet of the subject property in the R-1 Single Family Residential Zoning District. If the average is greater than 18,000 square feet, the new required minimum lot size becomes 15,000 square feet. If the average is less than 18,000 square feet, the required minimum lot size remains at 10,000 square feet. For 1017 Ravine Trail, the average size of the lots within 250 feet is approximately 15,530 square feet. Therefore, the minimum lot size of each new lot is 10,000 square feet. The existing lot is 29,635 square feet. The proposed Lot 1, the northern lot, would be 17,884 square feet and the proposed Lot 2, the southern lot, would be 11,770 square feet. City Code also requires that each lot have a minimum of 80 feet of width at the front setback line and maintain 80 feet of width for 70 feet of depth. Both lots would have over 100 feet of width at the 35-foot setback point and maintain sufficient width 70 feet back from the lot line. The dimensions of both of the newly created lots provide a sufficient building envelope for development. This property was approved by the City for a similar subdivision in 2008 but the process was not completed and a final plat was never recorded. It is noted that the applicant sent a mailing to the neighborhood regarding the proposed subdivision. Staff did not receive any comments. 1 Staff Review The proposed two-lot subdivision qualifies as a minor subdivision because the property located at 1017 Ravine Trail is an existing platted lot of record, the proposed subdivision will produce fewer than four lots, and it will not create the need for public improvements. The applicant has submitted a survey of the existing lot prior to the proposed subdivision, as well as a preliminary plat displaying the two lots after the subdivision. Both lots would have access off Ravine Trail. The existing home has two curb cuts—one of these would be maintained for access to the existing home while the other would be repurposed to serve the new south lot. The one existing sanitary sewer service is non-compliant with the City's Inflow and Infiltration requirements, but a deposit agreement has been executed guaranteeing that the necessary repairs will be made. At the completion of construction of the second home, the new service line will be inspected to ensure it is also compliant. As required by the Subdivision Code, a tree inventory was performed in order to document a!I existing trees. This inventory will be reviewed by the City Forester and used to calculate any required tree replacement as the south lot is developed. The Engineering Division has reviewed the application and has provided permitting information and technical comments regarding the survey and plat, utilities, stormwater management, the Natural Resources Management Plan, and trees and landscaping (see attached memo). The Fire Department has reviewed the application and has no comments or concerns. There is a deferred street assessment of$4,800 for this property which must be paid prior to the release of the Final Plat, in addition to a Park Dedication fee of$11,010. Qualification Governing Approva) as a Minor Subdivision According to Section 12.50 of the City's Subdivision Regulations, the following are the regulations governing approval of minor subdivisions with staff comments related to this request: 1. Minor subdivisions shall be denied if the proposed lots do not meet the requirements of the appropriate Zoning District. Both of the lots of the proposed subdivision meet the requirements of the R-1 Single Family Zoning District. 2. A minor subdivision may be denied if the City Engineer determines that the lots are not buildable.The City Engineer finds that the lots are buildable. 3. A minor subdivision may be denied if there are no sewer and water connections available or if it is determined by the City Engineer that an undue strain will be placed on City utility systems by the addition of the new lots. The addition of the new lots will not place an undue strain on City utility systems. 2 4. Approval of the minor subdivision may require the granting of certain easements to the City. New utility easements must be dedicated and shown on the Final Plat. 5. If public agencies other than the City have jurisdiction af the streets adjacent to the minor subdivision,the agencies will be given the opportunities to comment. MnDOT has been contacted regarding this subdivision, but not response has been received to this point. In response to the previous subdivision proposal in 2008, MnDOT had no comments or concerns. 6. The City may ask for review of title if required by the City Attorney for dedication of certain easements. The City Attorney will determine if such a title review is necessary prior to approval of the Final Plat. 7. ThQ minor subdivision may be subject to park dedication requirements. A park dedication fee of $11,010 (6% of the estimated land value with 50%credit for one unit) is required for this subdivision. 8. The conditions spelled out shall provide the only basis for denial of a minor subdivision. Approval will be granted to any application that meets the established conditions. All conditions have been met. Recommended Action Staff recommends approval of the proposed minor subdivision subject to the following conditions: 1. The City Attorney will determine if a title review is necessary prior to approval of the Final Plat. 2. A park dedication fee of$11,010 shall be paid before release of the Final Plat. 3. A deferred special assessment of$4,800 shall be paid before release of the Final Plat. Attachments: Location Map (1 page) Memo from the Engineering Division dated January 11, 2018 (5 pages) Survey, Preliminary Plat, and Tree Inventory submitted December 20, 2017 (4 pages) 3 09 �10 501 — 500 501 �'� 504 517 609 617 512 516 520 528 532 �6 600 516 515 1 � 601 G� 600 603 �-�,. 700 '�v 640 641 616 615 708 709 700 T09 700 '' 701 ��F�. 708 �`�' 717 800 801 � 801 �� 800 716 817 800 -•: 721 "�a�! 817 825 � 810 9�1 808 817 800 � ''� �r,,ti 803 816 ':;;r,r gS 1 808 816 816 � � 824 ��'•t 901 82d 901 820 832 � ' 915 1001 1015 1031 909 a5oo aa�a aaoo Subject Property �oo� �oas . �oo� 1009 `� 920 1101 1000 �020 1�� 1100 a5 II409 1017 d112 1109 g ,�.� 4102 �30 ,�p22 4012 1122 1125 _ ,� ` �t� • Y w F � � ' . 4T '�� ° -.. ...::-, .. �'�. ,' ... ... . .... ' . u . .: � ' �e ��r r . p .. . ,... ... ,.... � ��. d410 1300 4121 4117 4111 4� `�0 4330 4310 1307 41014015�07130d 1301 1300 1324 1308 4450 5� ' 1315 1340 1320 1312 1307 1310 �� 4335 �25 4315 1323 1370 S�r; 1316 _ 4415 1309 r; 1407 r-,. 1311 �' 1415 . 1401 13 45 . �2� id40 p�fz�: 13171315 1416�:.; YYa.7L7 4330 ;. 1407 1404 1319 14391� � 1421 44?0'—A340 1410 '; 1d15 1435 ' �'�� ,d325 1408 1�61410 14111429 .� �1��j1 �?� Public Works Department 763-593-803p 1763-593-3988{fax) Date: January 11, 2018 To: Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager From: Jeff Oliver, PE, City Engineer Eric Eckman, Development and Asset Coordinator Subject: Hunt Addition - Minor Subdivision—1017 Ravine Trail Engineering staff has reviewed the application for a minor subdivision, called Hunt Addition, located on Ravine Trail between Sunset Ridge and Westwood Drive South. The application involves the subdivision of an existing parcel to create two new parcels. The existing home, with an address of 1017 Ravine Trail, will remain on the north lot (Lot 1). A new home will be constructed on the south lot (Lot 2). The comments contained in this review are based on plans submitted to the City on December 20, 2017 and revised January 5, 2018. Engineering comments are as follows: 1. Existing boundary/topographic survey a. The benchmark used in determining elevations (hydrant across from 1017 Ravine Trail) was replaced in 2016 and is not part of the City's current benchmark system. Before the submittal of permits, please contact engineering staff to obtain new benchmarks. b. Topographic information is required a minimum of 50 feet around the property boundary. Due to the steep slopes on the east portion of the property and beyond the property boundary, it is critical that the survey be expanded 100 feet to the east to include the top of the slope,the driveway and a portion of the front yard at 4112 Wayzata Boulevard, and the western end of Wayzata Boulevard, including top of curb, gutter, and storm sewer structures. This survey information must be provided on the stormwater plan for Lot 2 at the time of permitting. 2. .Site Plan and Access a. Each home must have one driveway onto Ravine Trail. According to the grading plan submitted, the new home on Lot 2 will utilize the existing curb cut and concrete apron that currently serves as a second driveway for 1017 Ravine Trail. A City Right-of-Way Management Permit is required for the removal of the existing driveway and construction of the new driveway. Contact Brennan Johnson at bpjohnson��oldenvalleymn.�av to apply for this permit. b. Ravine Trail was reconstructed by the City as part of its 1995 street improvement project. Records show there is a deferred special assessment that was attributed to the vacant, developable portion of the property. Deferred assessments become due at the time of development and therefore must be paid before final plat approval. 3. Preliminary Plat a. The property proposed for development includes Lot 9 and part of Lot 8, Block 11 West Tyrol Hills. City records indicate there are no existing easements across the property, therefore none needs to be vacated to facilitate development. The City's Subdivision code requires new drainage and utility easements on all plat boundaries and interior lot lines. The preliminary plat appears to meet the requirements of the code. b. The proposed development is adjacent to I-394 and therefore may be subject to review and comment by MnDOT. 4. Utilities a. The City's water and sanitary sewer systems that provide service to this property have adequate capacity to accommodate the proposed development. b. The applicant has submitted a preliminary utility plan showing the extension of water and sanitary sewer services to the mains under Ravine Trail. Permits required for this work include Water and Sewer permits, a Sanitary Sewer Inflow and Infiltration (I/I) permit, and a Right-of-Way Management permit. The Right-of-Way permit is required for all excavations and obstructions within public streets and right-of-way. As part of this permit, Ravine Trail will need to be restored in accordance with City standards. Contact Brennan Johnson at bpic�hnsonCa� a� Idenvallevrr�n.�ou to apply for this permit. As a reminder, in order to protect the City's investment in its infrastructure, no pavement excavations are allowed between November 1st and the date that spring load restrictions are lifted by MnDOT,typically in April or May. c. All private utilities serving the new home, such as electric, cable, and telecommunications, must be buried underground. d. The City has a Sanitary Sewer Inflow and Infiltration (I/I) Reduction Ordinance. City records indicate that the property at 1017 Ravine Trail is not yet compliant. However, an I/I Deposit Agreement was executed between the owner and the City to guarantee that compliance will be obtained in a timely manner. The existing and new sewer services in this development must be inspected by the City, and must achieve compliance with the City's I/I Ordinance, prior to occupancy of the new home. 5. Preliminary Grading Plan (Stormwater Management) a. The proposed development is located within the Bassett Creek Watershed. However, due to the size of the development, the project does not meet the threshold for review by the Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission (BCWMC). b. The applicant submitted a preliminary grading plan for the development. There is no grading proposed on Lot 1 which contains the existing home. Conversely, Lot 2 will be mostly re-graded, and a 5 to 9 feet high retaining wall added, to accommodate the new home and separate it from the steep slope that rises to the east. Staff has concerns about removing vegetation, filling and grading the slope. Efforts should be made to minimize the disturbance to the slope if possible. c. Staff is aware of a localized drainage issue where, during intense rainfalls, stormwater from the area collects and runs across the abutting property located at 4112 Wayzata Boulevard,then proceeds down the steep slope toward 1017 Ravine Trail. Some of this issue may have been mitigated in 2010 when certain improvements were completed at 4112 Wayzata, including the construction of a small basin (rain garden)to collect stormwater in the front yard. The overflow for the rain garden exits to the west and proceeds down slope just south of the existing house at 1017 Ravine. In order to properly address the localized drainage concern, the applicant must: i. Show on the grading plan and construct a defined swale (stabilized with vegetation or rock) between the homes on Lots 1 and 2 to ensure that stormwater overflows from the rain garden at 4112 Wayzata will run down to Ravine Trail without impacting either of the homes. ii. Explore the construction of a defined overflow from the west end of Wayzata Boulevard to Ravine Trail to redirect stormwater away from the proposed home on Lot 2. As discussed in Section 1.b. above, due to the steep slopes on the east portion of the property and beyond the property boundary, it is critical that the survey/stormwater plan for Lot 2 be expanded 100 feet to the east to include the top of the slope, the driveway and a portion of the front yard at 4112 Wayzata Boulevard, and the western end of Wayzata Boulevard, including top of curb, gutter, and storm sewer structures. This will help determine if there is an opportunity to improve the overall drainage patterns in the area. City staff is available to look into this with the applicant to review opportunities for drainage improvements. d. According to the plan, the proposed driveway grade is 16.2%. Driveway grades between 2% and 10% are recommended and generally result in a more usable and maintainable surface. The Developer and Contractor are encouraged to explore designs that achieve a more desirable driveway grade. e. The Developer or contractor will be required to obtain a City Stormwater Management Permit for the grading, drainage, and erosion control proposed in this development. A stormwater management plan meeting City standards is required as part of the permit submittal. Contact Tom Hoffman, Water Resources Technician at thoffmanC��oldenvalleymn.�;t�v to apply for this permit. f. In general, existing drainage patterns in the area must be maintained or improved if possible, and stormwater runoff from each property must be minimized to the maximum extent practicable. Staff will review the stormwater plan for Lot 2 in more detail when the permit application is submitted. 6. Natural Resource Management Plan —Staff consulted the natural resource management plan. No ecologically valuable communities or land covers were identified on this property in the 2013 natural resource inventory. Furthermore, the property is not located within a "green corridor" as identified in the Natural Resource Management Plan. However, consistent with the City's plan staff recommends removing buckthorn and any other exotic, invasive, or noxious vegetation species located on the property as part of this development and in accordance with state and local laws. 7. Tree and Landscape Permit-The Developer has submitted a tree survey and inventory consistent with the City's Subdivision Ordinance. A tree and landscape permit will need to be obtained before beginning any work onsite. Permit submittals include a tabular inventory of significant trees and a plan showing trees to be removed, protected, and planted. The City Forester will review the inventory and plan in more detail at the time of permitting. Contact Tim Teynor at te nor oldenvalle mn. av to apply for this permit. 8. The Developer must obtain all permits required for development of this property. Recommendation Engineering staff recommends approval of the application for minor subdivision subject to the comments contained in this report. Approval is also subject to the comments of the City Attorney, other City staff, and other governmental entities. Please feel free to call me or Eric Eckman if you have any questions regarding this matter. C: Tim Cruikshank, City Manager Marc Nevinski, Physical Development Director Sue Virnig, Finance Director Emily Goellner, Associate Planner John Crelly, Fire Chief Joe Kauth, Building Official Tim Kieffer, Public Works Maintenance Manager AI Lundstrom, Park Maintenance Supervisor and City Forester Marshall Beugen, Street & Vehicle Maintenance Supervisor Joe Hansen, Utilities Supervisor RJ Kakach, Assistant City Engineer Tom Hoffman, Water Resources Technician Brennan Johnson, Engineering Technician ,A ~ o �� 9 L4SS NW'A3lltln N30lO�J'llVill 3NIA`da L LO L G,.� W �'+�� m �30�� p � �, 2 . °�, '�� g� m 1Nf1H-N3��b21��W\/ONI�aNV 1Nf1H WOl ��wN � _ ; � �' tl� � �" �_�� $ � N � J O � � ` �� 9L4SS NW`Jl3lldA N3U10'J'1N2113NIAV2!LLOL �g'�°o W ¢ � � N z � / 1 � �` � ��w�� q-; k � z � � ` , � •� �' 3 �y�a�agg� J � k o K N V �� i�J � Y��C� ��N fA � 1 N � � � Sw . W '� . .i O� �q��'wg y � � � W '�''„$ �� N011laad 1Nf1H =U��y� � � o 0 �; � � < < � � lo3road ' � g X a W Z O � Q Z � � W � W � = a � H W �d� W H�� F =(�Z Z F N Z� � 1-– W -��W W r ai �u�aa � � o�o 0 m U U U� � � � W � � � J �W� J �w � V °LL o � J �O N O Z �O O � � o�� Q _ � a�� Q �o- � � �- w o � am W �? O � w � d �/ / � � � �_ W z . � Q _ ° � a i o Z J J � w W � J � w � �� Z � ; QQ � � � zzz — � � � � � � � � � � � � N � � � L� W �� '�� Z � Q m m X � U � �,�� , � s � � a w v � � �3 � J � o a W �� o � z ��„ "' � w c� w � � . ....., .. � . �� u�i � � � r� w 3 z w z z z i z Z �c.. i � � � � � � N � � � � � � � t�n y t�n J � �� Q � � � � J � oQ � o � � a � � � � — �. C� ... ... . u� w u9 u� u� u� w w w w � in 3 � > > y V ¢�. � �.. .. t� '2 '2 �2 �2 �2 '2 '2 �2 �2 o z z z z i z � � X S X X � K � � yx yx yx Nx Nx _x R R R LL � R d R R R W W W W W W �1 \ Z � � � m ~ZZ O = ¢ x ¢ Z I � � W � Q Y _ _ _ I � U 2 . . . I i:�� i�'� /� � — I '', C7 C7 U' a ,.,�,, � � __ � � � _ _ � _ _ Z � � � � � Z � f/1 f/1 N � � � � � W -} � � , I - � � jo � � 0 , , �'�'� . o a � � J :', o � � O J � r O Z Z 7 � � 0 � � � U c� 3 3 � � � �a � � � 8 F' � z 5 � � 4 � "r' o o k z w � z � c9 w � � S � � H Q w � O Z O O O p � G Z O � '��' > a y a ¢ a ,`�,` o z ' �q � "' � w �'�'3 � � '��' 0 5 0 � 'd �S t ? H IJ W� W W W � O 0 (~j S W � r LL U � _ � � �� w w � � � � c� z � c9� [9 c7 c9 i c9 a $ m � � K � � � �� S88o � ; _ � y � � � : V/ W ' � ' J N � o ~ � `� i i�i � io �/�\J � - �' J ' o tLL : :.: � �� / / W '., X m m � � . i H . m m w � i � � � Q ' � � ' . i Z S Z 'Qi � � � � � � � W Z f � � � � � � � � � ZJ� � � aW E � 0Z�J O � �� Y ¢W�� LLl �2 60 d =�Wo� Z y3N��'A O �,�o�� C7 � Fo,q N d ��U'iD� W U<NNm •^ � � I �� 91b64'NW`�e��e�uap�o�q�l auine2l L 101 � w !i � } } } O Q < 2 W 9 � �3oazy P � I Q d 1 �7 WN a� Fa�a�z � Z P > I i I p Q� ■ - 'i� irci�o II `�N g � 4 Y � ..�' ! �O N ` �e . ��a� jOoz�� 1 u��i ' � '�` � � f°�oii i I, m Q � 2 .� ��y W��aa I{ � � O a' I 3oU W \� �^ U � L ��^ >`LL�-myg� `�O m � ��y � i �1�tlN a� �al au�ne2� 1�0� W�6aW� f � . :� � F ,Z p �a4WZ o . I � Nay�g p �O �� i�aroad ` ; ° __ - rnY�= __ _ 3 - - T c t -- - q �� g Y�c� o�?u t i �u O aF o y �rq� a�1„�3� �° oE W . z � E o m� � �„ n "$,"ax V ;o o i F °m � W ''^ � �'8 q c c c E 3$5 v c. 3 � z � m o p W j � O � s a$.E m _ vY-"�< `wLo>R £� � S � u � O o a u�i °a `a m ° S u w W g g u i s'Y� � � Effit� $�°.Vn�g € RE z � � x x S arv � a € g� "� , c, ��M v=="vo � :� y � e� o �: �- v � o p o Yg= � � - . t8�="a o ar z� ��9 � ��= L�m4g� x �� A„� �� '+s�� pq>oE5 �» T`s� � a � o � F=�•.� Soa ?� °pp '5 � Q� w F z �s� �e � c °'u °u �& a: W = W z S � 3 '„'� a v = � 8 "< � � � � � � � � ` ��^. � � - 3a3 � o o z a w E c9 E �� N . �og� ��. c_ 3 ��O � _ `�' :^ % i- h R :*,.� �^_ F � �) � _ � w � N m g � � w £�� n ga M o°� oEo_ =--=&5 =� = u � - - - `s. "x � 3 � � 3 �. � p � £ o o Z � � z 8 N � ` 0 3 E o 3� _ = 8 B. ' ' � w � � v� �n � � W w a u w a � t Y y o . �� _ C o .. c W V ,,,1 LL H ¢ w F � F ¢ � � p O °� c � v - v;" vd ' N` Z "'' z a _ � � u� o �=o ,.Ea= � ax � � � e �oOm � � c� u • $`_ a 4 a � a ��zv �- - es ^ � � W�:, a�y = � A� °' �a� _ '- - t P> � o, v� � z � >� � � v ^ �� " y E e � E 6 N � _ � � � � Ea � vM, �z � '� i �` a � � � w LL � W � �� p � � _"�' .°,u�� 9r o� o E" ' $ � � � � � _ ' $ � 3 � � - n � � � � � ? y � a w - a LL � 3 z¢ Q o � ' =n w E£ � '% � m r � R :: � Q _ � O � j z ? Q w F > £ o �y' ; az - �m ooq' x a E° �� s � � _ a m e � z a ry � � M C � a a g w t u a oo° m m w � � ' ,N - J LL u a � o r w u' � u `3 3 � ��w o � ^o �G ' `- c 40 , v' �) 3�` Z C �E a � N 3e E Hv� gL� I . I I �i . � tN • .�.i t� t 'o e � E� x�` ��. I � ��,. �61 ' '� a l� -" =�Y' .3� _ L ,. - I� .. .�r� � -� �E> E o ��3 yiI 9 � � G �i r wc 3�'.E$. 3Pmdo� .-u nnM n ^ y `II , '., o� g 3 s t� .. �v m o �n � n m m . o ,,, ,,,, �'. . . . . . . . . . � I �I� ��t � - � . � ,� ,,,',,, �. I I I I' � i __' _" ._.._ —.—.. —_ _—'- __�_. —_—_ '__-_ io�--_�NI --- --_ _-- 1-- — —-- -- -- — — -- -- —� � °_ � i a�. � � �3 � �' �: �m , � _ � �t+ o�= ; �� Yi � Q� �h ' Opi� _ �-�`� o� ��'\x/\ CL y_ Z I � �� B06 9I�� 33 I � � ..-�_ r ,- � _ � x � s� xe �6,x •� � �s�,:;,.J rQ,6 ..�a� �r a� a �. � $ SV o �,�Sy� y�N � z ( � � � M.� �a= _ �a G'o ._ �, � � - t � � �- , . , _ od � c: / .4 .._ . � . .f.. a �11,.- -O�}ZGy Cl.h 'x`� � '- � .+ t � o S`' ,• ' � � t . �I " .'�1.-� �. (a.iuFJsO:eld)06[ <v _ _ � l _ 9 g�� ase- � � i � £0'ObT 3 OO�OZoTON � �� ,_ � , ; �.�% . ` � -� :;� � �\� �k � � � v ti. ^ > � �:R� �\ � � �i r�'o �� .. _ �� a � : �_: ;,. r;, '�� (t� V ��`=`}x .�^,��-�Tvcck.- � ._ .. �.:� osa � . 4 ? �� _,�<_ _ ry ' Z9'g6 I ,Y � � ,f ' � N � N9 \ �q � Q g�! u.. asnp S/ul aune=eab uo�5e una I � F � .. Gsh�$ ^ 36_ k` i O roa.� w�' NPaPi � bCIO[ P � I'� dBi )E--� _ M x� X k �`G9'£F J S tlei Pue��.e tio s z � ,� �'A' '� . sae � b F a I 6t r * , '� . � � e i ,. � � �_ �� z'" "� . xZ e� (/� � r t IM1 i �rZi � .. s.3Y'3'� k I . F ,..a;Cf" • �, , �. �4z . zee� m � asBz � j �� m ��°� �� ` J (�•�x �� ,j ..i- 0 uo � ., a1T. X ,! � �O Cf bL } ' � M `4' " M1a z � x�. .9 .X o`�Y`, . 4 c . �, g,1PL -'�-�, ,9 z . I ,.,o � (�'� v• #-- `�� ' � �Sf S��C .. � �l /FI "---_'�- s�� °�r °� .- . ' - � h, 1 ?�, � , , a ��k� �-w �cse�a nn�'x 6 �' -,e ��a �� ti � G � � v m� �- . . • .n K� s � �j v�e— ' � . , �- � �- �6, °�� e � 7, � � a � 1r` " �-_,F �;�� V � � � > .� _ . ,� � I �` ao ;�� ` .�x�� a a �W v _ . �. .� W � �3'a a � � r�Is[a . .,; .. m .� �r � � �� . ,� �� y B . �, T�avy• , " � .- 6.ro '" �5'n � N �3 a1 8 ` � -` . p, r (.. � - //�� _'_'_'___ - � �^ � v 2 / � � ,� . '° .. � \ / � \ E .. � __ � � --". #F � e . �. b ^ ,r..., ; ..�_ l.i '83'Yt e, f Cg 's_ ti` � ` �' m " -- � � „J / \ ' __ � . J � J �'� � E - w a �_ ,' v � � l � � �' � .,' b�b -`..�� .,, ,r� � � 1 � �� a� n -------- - ,� � a .� .j � ��a� �,s�.... � .. � ' i �� a�c ,.,..... � � �- � i k : .. ��-�41�� __ � " .... Q 8 s�`b�� osss JJ/� '��id v�se�` � . .._ r� � __�` �, fi „ � �_.P°�� _ �__ � Y Oz• >,�� `��n' s,�a�sa.� �,.� �;g �,�tbt -4�-_ � �� a,�� 5'' �' � � -�"�.--> o >sa��; rss1� x I � �ti m �,: � -t ��>��`. � - "�,�� M�6S,�OS � ay� >� x:--`t . �e`=-� _ � , f �� `�1--_."„"'--I �_ -y �� F��:�a=., -�___ sr� 'y, .. ga� ��--�� > - �7� �m;a„wndv)� �z��.... �`g � i u. �a�e a - �____8'�—'-�_ ' 'Ss-�� 3NI/1 a � ;�s ; a _ - '------._, _ > b � �� '�-� �— �'=i =----__ ;� ----r ,.,., � ��>�_;� � �y,, - � 3b� r '--__ rW =�=-��----____ rB � «w,`,x„� °_„'�t\ sX� .'a ,_., .q, /c- /II ,""-_---�--__- cz< � � .Ab<� a'^�ej > a �y�"�� c� �)b TJ E 3Z9Yo�'� �,—E-r_ 1„�,�� ESn G� � .� N ✓ `J ��^-__ �� Ja _. 1 �.� 0'LgB= � � F �$ � \. -'----_ sA °3e.. � _ �� `^ °� ��___��' � i�_�� i ..s e.�v ,w'�° � k � I `�� , � '" x � � �d_---__ �:d �,,.��' \ � '_-- �.:�:� �� 1 �.P,,; i -�F 1;& �h ``�`o',Y i ,�� I E � � 9L4SS NW'A3llb'A N30lO�J'lIV2�13N1�tl2!LLO� �,W � 6� � � r O `�'J : �;s�=� a "a a � ��7 g� � 1Nf1H-N3��V21��W VaNll aNt/1Nf1H WOl �g��w� o � ' } � � ' � � r � �O� �� f 9LYSSNW'A3lltlAN3�10�J�1NM13NIA1MLL06 ��o��$$ � � � o ? o a R _ �yq= �� o � v � •� � �: �Ff�ogg s � � � o � �� m�m�� aa m H > � � W � ° � �� N011laa�d 1Nf1H �� a y �q � w � a � �� . — �m» � y O o w �y a 1�3fOild � oW� J R �__ � a 4 �� w Z � � ? w <Y� � a ��LL o � � � 3 i0 _ W�„ Z a y o 4 �op� � � � � � � �wa = � � � X w a �LLo oi v{ J I U � Qi� � z Z � w ��a� �$� > � g ' � I W wme z w � - ��o o > ^ W � I r � �z� � w i N � i 3 � � � � � cn I I I W �,m � d�s � � z � o = � ia� � d z Y O ��W � � � � � � a n' LL $�$ � z N � `�' � .wFi �.�.,� i � � � � & o � N `�� _ { � � � � � � sm�� , F � t � �+ � � � � � �� o �'��'o� > � � w � �' F LL f/� rz a�oi�" o � � � �i K � � �n � �O � i � _ � � 3 ` � � � t? s F � �c 3 > vdi z g � a ,ri Z voi � `a'�z z � �d i `o�� :1 � � LL �i'W � 5 w i�i� w � � a j C� `R'+6- a `�`��' g = � ��_� s = � � & _ " � � � w w w �� a " � ��aa � � � � N � cn �, �, � � LL 3a � � 3?F� o wZ � N '�' � o W & ¢ yZ y w N'�p� i��Z a � 8 .:�� `ai p ~ V cs—i � � � i7 z O �c S ZF ��; ��'-+ Z � o 03�0 0 � � w � �Z � Z � o � �ow c��o?��ug ? �" � Z v� "aJ °�d�o '��''� � W a � s�� S a � w u�i � F Z � �+ i 000� o S d � w .o e �n m r, m m O t�.� a � f��uwi m .' Z� ,, Z� � . �� I ! �o ' ^" � I � o , -- �_ W� I w� � i � - - - - - � � - - - - - �.,_--- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - io - - - - - — I � �a o= I I �� °� � I i / J W p7 o`3` V1 Q , � °x �� ! � � �m a � `�x �� 3 - � � I i � �� -�� , -- � i � � � wv a,� j`� � 'ql9 0 3 - 1 .. � 0 I �� To�\ I �ic _" = ��x � �6 �� t° I £ ' � �sX 2 m I . II \\%� � ; 1 m I � ° °' M � \� �'k'', I `� �'� � 6�� ` ' a � \\ \ \\ �� (�x �(awe15i.0]eld)04I '" I x - �- � �' � � m 0'04i 3��00,0'�ON J I .. ��\ � s� S. —� � �� 6'D3UERSE�a'� — — U�I� o � � �� S2 V � � � � �m o� �� o� _-_ - � � � .� �� ti c�> °'x I'° ff �-- - - - I � I � i � � / I 1.�*�RSg--t - g-- N� / 3 �i es_��o� m � z�q � I - - -. /� � �{t X O p r asn°H Pa'�1�nz ea�b uoraeP�no I � C ��c w � ``3� P�S��r� '�o'Pp� I � O 'K.�'s� ,'- . i'�r e 5 b ' X �� z `xz (m �;� �`w�o � I o , /�a �� Y i I � `�x �.`�-� ' 0x^. B � 4 �� J LL I �g Q I I � x r st ^ a �� y m!/) � � - .�s�ce 'x s� _ ct�e LL szsn � I,e � �� N p j. o„ _. � c� aa1 �S�eX —�_x_, � �m � ,� � � o� � �� , xs�k m �-mm m , � �,I I 6� ° ; Y .. � 1 y,r_�NBB.98Cy�Cfi[9 7-6[d I � �I a0 ` I pp� H vi _ e -'ftPP _ , I , � �� s` � e�� m � - - � � m d� I �W � 69B �I m mX � , '�e� a a W � I � �� ase � � � � 'FSB �E � Co L�a�� ,I_ — — _ -� LL _ _ I � _-� e� _ _ � M �a �� — r�� —1- - I �� -�� tQ a' � � � � � � i � J : � .a, . +�.��I — —r — — — �I � / ; � ,--- -¢-� � �I F'S98=� � f S9B . � Q i�1 �I . OS9B� . �9B� a. ' I 1 P V 6->9B=l1`J �9B=J1 0z T� wi � °`.'I I _ — sssa=n� a�ese=� iq�_'x ma�sse=�i � � z � _e�DBUEqgE. �1' � �'�ti�, � r��. ��,� � �s9BqMj I �$ �� I I � '�-,� — i >cse=ai = M�,6S�6Eo80S �Oe.sr � m� V �,� '��> . � ezsa=no m a � � ' _�� '_�' '� a9'>9B� :a s m a '�. ��'��. � Gniao i ��=a �—� �—�>> >Ib� ��q��,d, '��9g� � / � { -� i �� -n9B=11� '��VI '�S.A��6 � �1V�� / � } '.I � ', � _ —NE —-�, � . ,sa_ r . � � Q �1 Cf9B= �� ' �_ �—' D �! � I _� � ��. 6i - e I �'F9B=J1 �y8 �� <-9 `.ay S a �� --- - - ---- -�r'�, � rv�o e a a �, � •�o�> �. Ap�a � ��` � � __ Z'Z98=RJ .��_ .5)'�, T9�;o��'� E c¢ �/ I� _ — _ —__ . . . S! —�__ A �rc_ :r� i � ^'`��_= r� �_� I� x li — � . 0'29B,�1 B s m �_.. . � ��. `J1,.� II Spg ea Fs � ', .. Bp S �(m ��_ _I '. � � � '�`. �_ � , 9 J1 +\ , — —_I 6�X �_ (e mm�j �\ 9�"� � f Ilr �J~ \ ��X J��u II � I I I I � , � A' 9L4SS NW'A3llb'A N30lO�J'llVtll 3NIAH2!LLOL ��LL W Z $ ;d� � ��ooi� m �d �a O � 'r*^"�� gx m 1Nf1H-N3H�b21��W VaNI�aNV 1Nf1H WOl ��' � � � rz a v J ��_ �� m N � ¢� � � � 9LYSS NW`A3l'1VA N30�O�J`�Nl113NIAVM LL06 �o��h o w � � � � ~ 0 � �' a z a U R g � � oow°'z c��-: � k � 3i z � � �� mOaw� � �r m z � z « �� 3� � m,�os�� a �', h > H � w� � ''� � � � NOI11C]ab� 1Nf1H �W�WW� ? ' � � � � a W � �,g � W"�H�= � N o � w a � $ lo3road ° � & 4 R a � Q J 'Vw� J Q �LLG U � W ao'= O w�e H �� wp� N n w �a � � � �Y �3 Y � � � � � � � .� � a � � � � e � � � �' -� � F � b b 6 6 i� R ti F �' .� � �.S F h �i �i b n .� ~ � R � � FF � � � F. � � � A � R § § � 9 '. } W Y Z O � a �9 � o9 $9 dy � �S � � � a o �8 �8 �8 � 2 9 � _- tl � � 9 � N 3 C F �9 �d � 6 6 L i� b b b �. 3 � 3 b k .� � h h W U O Ga' g � # # S & � ssass � � a � n � a � � W yo�a8�� "�osWa F �O�aU�Jcwi � __ _ — — — — — — _ — _ — — — — — — — _ — / �' f // �p °= I / I � -N > I J W 0] I � o`3 ?F I o ON � I � � _ �> � � I , � =m I z< cmM \\ \ I N N m= i � i I � � X� h �� \ �s�-aas- 9l� w v �3 I I a � N � S _ � �°'x � ��'>cT �-�� TX °� t� � � II � � • �`�o� �-_- o�� °x i� � � ��I � � � '- � ; -• ,p , i 3 y c � -_�\l� � —=� � ,, � _ m _ `° , w ��"s�-s� ' j �,� ^9' \\� _ ,� L-0��.g94��\ -'X\. I `� �jF a-: ;� _ J _i� \ \ \�\ `_ °�,$ _--miC N (a�uelsid leldJ Obi � �I X -� �-___�-_-�B �� /� `r .. � � '--� ---996--- �\ _��\\ \� �� Q'�� u��pl� \�*. �o-r BB---�- �� _ �_v\ J a �T�1/ � ` � `��(��48-r� — � � � (/\I� -rw-_� JIG �� \ �� j _�_ w� � � `• � _ /4C —_�\ ` fn� Q ZB \ �\\\ � _- -_ -_ �I "'� �\\ \ a j � � O W / `I _� �\\ ` I -a-_- ` �� _ia�_I\\\ \��\ ��_—-_-�,� `� �6g�I� � 2 Z -y�g �� +ex� e ff� -- _ _ _ \ ��, / _ �g&3� � N� / 3 �_ _ '�i'bs'/l�py��.�z'ea�y � I I _ _ _�m -4\ �y&� �_ ___ W� / � n�� sno�{PaP�SQ.1��OI�IssaPPy I � ��// ` � g�=� -_- �o ��x . ��h�i�g�iao]Sz I -_-___- __`\ bg�\_�` y� m 6�x.� �4�s. , .�J i ��^ �n� � I � / I�-ll m� �� —_— �"-Z8 1 `I\ f `��e �� -^% s<�8 ro I^ . o ��7m m�w0� J lL I � � _ � �, � � � -� ' � � �m p e , r' � m� �— �, , �� °`� .�s, �� b� � � �----�. _,, � i m _ o� —, <9 �4 Fl[a � � '6--- ^ I � '• �` � `e:s<e�� Ixs�a<a' `p 9g� , �' � � m��$� r � `V� Q \�' � �_ t' 4�`.v � � Nr,,,Te-•,� �sacs�Q-b�a. --oae--- � �j , '� __-�,_ v ��1� - � � � s �� >� m-a�� v� � - ^o,• �� sse�7o---�--� � �, _ `e�� ,� y , � I ��r°'P . .�S6� � mK �� m L8-____- - � I I�<� �� , ` �� w � �XI _ _ � I � II�I �fi96�.. o � \�\\\�m \`� h� !q\�---�_�- I �r�/� � ��4 - ��___ Q r� �_�a.�_ � , — � � _�F \��\ = 3�.�ae9d-�-..v_ � ��2��\��lQ`m I -�__ r g� / � ��I �� I _ '- �\\ �_--_ / -8 - 1 v I ' o _ ` � . �-� _' ' _ - .. , � � .. --_ ,-' _ ' ` � �—�-�� =---J–_____ – –� –' _ --_, � �_�- _ � ° ' � ' � -- ` -.�998--- � �� '' � /��, _ 7R _. - __ £S9_��_--� S9B _�-___ ` ��.�'� \\ �_� _ _/__ � _-- �`` e�I__ Q �I I 8'� OS98 �' �` 9' I -"� \ \ � , o� P� I '� � 669By1� S'49B �1 ��4B=]1 I4989$.� `��aTDz I i �m�� _-- �-B9Bm _ --L\;� � � c�.d� m I I ro 98=l1� � m4�69B=�1 �� -_ '- ''------X--� �' 'Q � - - �'__'_ Ibga_�j I �iHB�j I �_�-- __ � `1' Q�' -' ^ - �' �\ .. .. . -----x.___ M,�5s,6��p�,� foesr � � � � �'� I I '_�� -'Y`�,_ .. \ I .. ____-$ d _ � .w+iJ_'- ---- _'+-99&- __ m.o`; j -,. ��_, ,� g � � � '�� h: ��;— d . Z a--__`` � �' 1 I } 8 1 � ,��— ��L _ �F , 22 �__ �nrc � . � -/� r 1 B_ w �. _ -___--_ -498- � ��4�� ' �� 11'. � ��\` -�9&-__--_T`� \ I Em6 , � _ �N � �,y� , �� `:�. �� ,9_ -� -r ET � �� e- 1 - u r ' . a rsa_� --��L � =�6,-----. _ � r��: [£98=J1 _ . 1 �, �x� �09 -'Z9g� m� I . �--__ - - �-- (°g a��fi 6� . a. '"n o '�s. � � _ _ — _ .. .. �Y_=�F2' � >�_�sp o�;$ gms � II .. '=a m,./ I"y - _� �. : _ 5-t .�— g$ s _�k g __ _ `RJ X �'j A' > I X ' --�_ _ _ — OZ9H��1 ��.�,��/ S�ae f `�'��+ m II II � fs Ym s°�. d _� � sog b �� . , �—_,_ �— ' .1 , amx � � � _ ,, � ,s8 �� .� �I —--- � N�� \ ��x il °� � � . � �. �,�:f:'�,� ��"�� c� � � 3 � � �� Y, � � � ��. . P��itca� I�ev+elo�rner�t �ep�rtment ��-��-so��t��-��-s�c��) Date: January 22, 2018 To: Golden Valley Planning Commission From: Emily Goellner, Associate Planner/Grant Writer Subject: Informal Public Hearing—Zoning Code Text Amendment—Amending Zoning Code to Require Compliance with Golden Valley Mixed-Income Housing Policy Background The City has identified the need for affordable housing as a high priority in the Comprehensive Plan. Mixed-income housing has been identified as an important component of the City's affordable housing goals. Research shows that mixed-income communities are a key component in building economic vitality and competitiveness by attracting and retaining residents, as well as supporting major employers. Several strategies have been researched for implementation at the local government level. One strategy to meet this goal is to work with local developers to reserve a portion of their new units for low- and moderate-income residents. The Golden Valley City Council adopted the Mixed-Income Housing Policy on September 19, 2017. The Policy requires that a portion of new housing units in eligible projects must meet affordability requirements set forth in the Policy. The Policy requires that Planned Unit Developments (PUDs) and projects requiring financial assistance from the City comply with the Policy. The proposed changes to the Zoning Code allow the Policy to apply to housing projects seeking a Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Zoning Map Amendment, and Conditional Use Permit as well. This will capture more anticipated projects in the City. For specific eligibility requirements, which differ between rental projects and for-sale projects, please refer to the attached Mixed-Income Housing Policy. Zoning Section Proposed Change R-1 Residential • Require compliance for single-family dwellings • Require compliance for single-family dwellings R-2 Residential • Require compliance for two-family dwellings • Require compliance for eligible townhouses • Require compliance for eligible townhouses R-3 Residential • Require compliance for eligible two-family dwellings • Require compliance for eligible multiple-family dwellings Zoning Section Proposed Change • Require compliance for eligible senior and physical disability housing • Require compliance for eligible multiple-family dwellings R-4 Residential • Require compliance for eligible senior and physical disability housing • Require compliance for all eligible PUDs Planned Unit . Remove affordable housing as a public amenity option since it will Developments (PUDs) be required Conditional Uses • Require compliance for eligible CUPs , • Require compliance for eligible projects that are granted a Zoning Map Amendment Administration . Require compliance for eligible projects that are granted a Comprehensive Plan Amendment Summary of Recommendations Staff recommends amending sections 11.21, 11.22, 11.23, 11.24, 11.55, 11.80, and 11.90 of the Zoning Code allowing required compliance with the Golden Valley Mixed-Income Housing Policy. Attachments Amended Golden Valley Mixed-Income Housing Policy (7 pages) Underlined/Overstruck Version of Section 11.21: Single-Family Residential Zoning District (R-1) (1 page) Underlined/Overstruck Version of Section 11.22: Moderate Density Residential Zoning District (R-2) (1 page) Underlined/Overstruck Version of Section 11.23: Medium Density Residential Zoning District (R-3) (3 pages) Underlined/Overstruck Version of Section 11.24: High Density Residential Zoning District (R-4) (1 page) Underlined/Overstruck Version of Section 11.55: Planned Unit Developments (2 pages) Underlined/Overstruck Version of Section 11.80: Conditional Uses (2 pages) Underlined/Overstruck Version of Section 11.90: Administration (2 pages) 2 CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY MIXED-INCOME HOUSING POLICY The purpose of this Policy is to meet the City's goal of preserving and promoting economically diverse housing options in our community by creating high quality housing in Golden Valley for households with a variety of income levels, ages, and sizes. The City recognizes the need to provide affordable housing to households of a broad range of income levels in order to maintain a diverse population and to provide housing for those who live or work in the City. Without intervention, the trend toward rising housing prices in new developments will continue. The City is adopting this Policy to encourage development of units that are affordable to low and moderate income households and working families. The requirements set forth in this Policy further the housing goals in the City's Comprehensive Plan to create and preserve affordable housing opportunities. These requirements are intended to provide a structure for participation by both the public and private sectors in the production of affordable housing. I. Applicability and Minimum Project Size This Policy applies to: 1. Market rate residential rental developments that add or create ten or more units and receive approvals under a Conditional Use Permit, Zonin� Map Amendment, Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment, or Planned Unit Development, or that receive Financial Assistance from the City, subject to all applicable sections of the City Code. 2. All for-sale residential developments that add or create ten or more units. 3. Any residential development for which the developer voluntarily opts in to this Policy. II.Affordable Dwelling Units A. General Requirement A development that is subject to this Policy shall include Affordable Dwelling Units. The minimum number of Affordable Dwelling Units required shall be determined based on the affordability standard chosen by the developer according to the criteria set forth in table T-1 below. Table T-1 Number of Affordable Minimum Affordability Standard Units Required Rental Projects At least 15%of total project units Affordable for households at 60% (chose one option) Area Median Income ("AMI"); OR At least 10% of total project units Affordable for households at 50% AMI. For-Sale Projects At least 10% of total project units Affordable for households at 80% AMI. 8. Calculation of Units Required The number of Affordable Dwelling Units required shall be based on the total number of dwelling units approved by the City. If the final calculation includes a fraction, the fraction of a unit shall be rounded up to the nearest whole number. If an occupied property with existing dwelling units is expanded,the number of required Affordable Dwelling Units shall be based on the total number of units following completion of expansion. C. Calcu/ation of Area Median Income("AMI") For purposes of this Policy, Area Median Income means the Area Median Income calculated annually by Minnesota Housing for establishing rent limits for the Housing Tax Credit Program. D. Rent Level Calcu/ation The monthly rental price for Affordable Dwelling Units shall include rent and utility costs and shall be based on the AMI for the metropolitan area that includes Golden Valley adjusted for bedroom size. E. Period of Affordability All Affordable Dwelling Units shall remain affordable for at least twenty (20) years. F. Location of Affordable Dwelling Units Except as otherwise specifically authorized under this Policy, all Affordable Dwelling Units shall be located within the development. G. Phased Development Construction of Affordable Dwelling Units shall be concurrent with construction of market rate dwelling units. For projects in which a development is to be constructed in multiple phases, each phase shall consist of at least ten percent (10%) Affordable Dwelling Units. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the total number of Affordable Dwelling Units in the completed project shall comply with the requirements of section It(A) above. III. Standards for Affordable Dwelling Units A. Size and Design of Affordable Units The size and design of Affordable Dwelling Units need not be identical to that of market rate units, but must be consistent with and comparable to market rate units in the same development. The size and design of Affordable Dwelling Units, including bedroom count and accessibility, shall be approved by the City. 8. Exterior/Inrerior appearance The exterior materials and design of Affordable Dwelling Units shall be indistinguishable in style and quality from the market rate units in the same development. The interior finish and quality of construction of Affordable Dwelling Units shall at a minimum be comparable to entry level rental or ownership housing in the City. IV. Integration of Affordable Dwelling Units A. Distribution of Affordable Housing Units Affordable Dwelling Units shall be incorporated into the overall project and shall not be separated from market rate units unless expressly allowed to be located in a separate building or a different location under section V of this Policy. 8. Tenants Affordable Dwelling Units in rental projects shall be rented only to income eligible families during the period of affordability. An income eligible family may remain in the Affordable Dwelling Unit for additional rental periods as long as the income of the family does not exceed one-hundred twenty percent (120%) of AMI. C. Home Buyers For-sale Affordable Dwelling Units shall be sold only to income eligible families during the period of affordability. If a home is resold during the period of affordability, it shall be resold at a price that is affordable for households at eighty percent (80%) of AMI. V. Alternatives to On-Site Development of Affordable Dwelling Units The City may approve one or more of the following alternatives to providing Affordable Dwelling Units at a location other than the project location ("Off-site Affordable Dwelling Units"). 1. Dedication of Existing Units: Creating Off-Site Affordable Dwelling Units by restricting existing dwelling units through covenants, contractual arrangements, or resale restrictions. The City shall determine whether the proposed units are suitable for affordable housing and whether the form and content of such restrictions comply with this Policy. Off-site Affordable Dwelling Units shall be located within the City. The restriction of such existing units must result in the creation of units that are of equivalent quality and size of the Affordable Dwelling Units which would have been constructed on-site if this alternative had not been utilized. 2. An alternative proposed by the applicant that directly provides or enables the provision of Affordable Dwelling Units within the City. The alternative must be approved by the City and made a condition of approval of the Affordable Housing Performance Agreement. All alternatives must be approved by the City Council and agreed to by the applicant in the Affordable Housing Performance Agreement. The applicant must show evidence acceptable to the City that a formal commitment to the proposed alternative is in place. The City shall not approve an alternative unless the applicant demonstrates: 1. The alternative provides an equivalent or greater amount of Affordable Dwelling Units in a way that the City determines better achieves the goals, objectives and policies of the City's housing goals in the Comprehensive Plan than providing them onsite; and 2. The alternative will not cause the City to incur any net cost as a result of the alternative compliance mechanism. VI. Incentives for Developers The City may provide incentives to participating developments in the form of exceptions from the underlying zoning codes. These incentives may include: 1. Rental developments: A. A minimum of a thirty-three percent (33%) reduction in required parking spaces B. A minimum of a ten percent (10%) density bonus 2. For-sale developments: Impact fee waivers for Affordable Dwelling Units. VII. Non-Discrimination Based on Rent Subsidies: Developments covered by this Policy must not discriminate against tenants who would pay their rent with federal, state or local public assistance, or tenant based federal, state or local subsidies, including, but not limited to rental assistance, rent supplements, and Housing Choice Vouchers. VIII. Affordable Housing Plan A. Applicability Developments that are subject to this Policy shall prepare and submit an Affordable Housing Plan to the City. B. Approval The Affordable Housing Plan shall be approved by the City. Minor modifications to the plan shall be subject to approval by the City Manager. Major modifications shall be subject to approval by the City Council. Items shall be designated as major or minor in the Affordable Housing Plan. C. Contents The Affordable Housing Plan shall include at least the following: 1. General information about the nature and scope of the development. 2. The total number of market rate units and Affordable Dwelling Units in the development. 3. The floor plans for the Affordable Dwelling Units showing the number of bedrooms and bathrooms in each unit. 4. The approximate square footage of each Affordable Dwelling Unit and average square foot of market rate unit by types. 5. Building floor plans and site plans showing the location of each Affordable Dwelling Unit. 6. A good faith estimate of the price of each Affordable Dwelling Unit. The price of Affordable Dwelling Units may be adjusted at the time of sale if there has been a change in the median income or a change in the formulas used in this Policy. 7. The order of completion of market rate and Affordable Dwelling Units. 8. Documentation and specifications regarding the exterior appearance, materials and finishes of the development for each Affordable Dwelling Unit illustrating that the appearance is comparable to the appearance of market rate units. 9. An Affordable Dwelling Unit Management Plan setting forth the policies and procedures that will be used to administer the Affordable Dwelling Units in accordance with the Affordable Housing Performance Agreement and this Policy. 10. For requests to an alternative to on-site provision of affordable housing, evidence that the proposed alternative will further affordable housing opportunities in the City to an equivalent or greater extent than compliance with the otherwise applicable on-site requirements of this Policy, and evidence that the alternative will not cause the City to incur any net cost as a result of the alternative compliance mechanism. 11. Any and all other information that the City may require to verify compliance with this Policy. IX. Recorded Agreements, Conditions and Restrictions An Affordable Housing Performance Agreement (the "Performance Agreement") shall be executed between the City and the developer in a form approved by the City Attorney. The Performance Agreement shall be based on the Affordable Housing Plan described in Section VII and shall include: A. the location, number,type, and size of affordable housing units to be constructed; B. sales and/or rental terms; occupancy requirements; C. a timetable for completion of the units; D. restrictions to be placed on the units to ensure their affordability; and E. any additional terms the City may require. The applicant shall execute any and all documents deemed necessary by the City, including, without limitation, restrictive covenants and other related instruments, to ensure the affordability of the Affordable Dwelling Units in accordance with this Policy. The applicant shall prepare and record all documents, restrictions, easements, covenants, and/or agreements that are specified by the City as conditions of approval of the application prior to issuance of a Building Permit for any development subject to this Policy. Such Documents shall be recorded in the office of the Hennepin County Recorder or Registrar of Titles, as applicable. X. Definitions Affordable Dwelling Unit: A dwelling unit within a residential project subject to this Policy that meets the applicable affordability standards in Table T-1. Financial Assistance: Funds derived from the City, including but is not limited to funds from the following sources: A. The City of Golden Valley B. Housin� and Urban Development (HUD), Minnesota Housin� Finance Agency (MHFA) Metropolitan Council and Hennepin Countv loan and �rant pro�rams, such as: i_Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) ii. HOME Investment Partnerships Pro�ram iii. Affordable Housing Incentive Fund (AHIF) iv. Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) v. Tax Base Revitalization Account (TBRA) vi. Livable Communities Demonstration Account (LCDA) �vii. Local Housin� Incentives Account (LHIA) (' D�inv�c+rv�i+n+ Aocio+�r�ro Dr�rrr�m �C. Tax Increment Financing (TIF) &Tax Abatement €:D. Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) Funds �E.Land Write-downs Affordable Housing Plan: A plan that documents policies and procedures for administering the Affordable Dwelling Units in accordance with the Affordable Housing Performance Agreement. Affordable Housing Performance Agreement: An Agreement between the City and the developer that formally sets forth development approval and requirements to achieve Affordable Housing in accordance with this Policy. § 11.21 Section 11.21: Single Family Zoning District (R-1) Subdivision 1. Purpose The purpose of the R-1 Zoning District is to provide for single-family, detached dwelling units at a low density along with directly related and complementary uses. Subdivision 2. District Established Properties shall be established within the R-1 Zoning District in the manner provided for in Section 11.90, Subdivision 3 of this Chapter, and when thus established shall be incorporated in this Section 11.21, Subdivision 2 by an ordinance which makes cross-reference to this section 11.21 and which shall become a part hereof and of Section 11.10, Subdivision 2 thereof, as fully as if set forth herein. In addition the R-1 Zoning Districts thus established and/or any subsequent changes to the same which shall be made and established in a similar manner, shall be reflected in the official zoning map of the City as provided in Section 11.11 of this Chapter. Subdivision 3. Permitted Uses The following uses and no other shall be permitted in the R-1 Zoning Districts: A. Single-family dwellings, consistent with the City's Mixed-Income Housina Policy. B. When the property owner resides on the premises, rental of single sleeping rooms to not more than two (2) people for lodging purposes only. C. Residential facilities serving six (6) or fewer persons. D. Manufactured homes, as defined in this Chapter. E. Foster family homes. F. Essential Services - Class I Subdivision 4. Accessory Uses The following accessory uses and no other shall be permitted in the R-1 Zoning Districts: A. Accessory structures, including private garages, as defined in this Chapter. 1. Accessory structures less than one hundred twenty (120) square feet in area require a Zoning Permit issued by the City Manager or his/her designee. The fee for the Zoning Permit is established by the City Council. The purpose of the Zoning Permit is to insure that accessory structures are located in a conforming location on the lot. (See Subdivision 11.) Golden Valley City Code Page 1 of 12 § 11.22 Section 11.22: Moderate Density Residential Zoning District (R-2) Subdivision 1. Purpose The purpose of the R-2 Zoning District is to provide for single and two-family dwellings at a moderate density (up to eight (8) units per acre) along with directly related and complementary uses. Subdivision 2. District Established Properties shall be established within the Moderate Density (R-2) Residential Zoning District in the manner provided for in Section 11.90, Subdivision 3 of this Chapter, and when thus established shall be incorporated in this Section 11.22, Subdivision 2 by an ordinance which makes cross-reference to this Section 11.22 and which shall become a part hereof and of Section 11.10, Subdivision 2 thereof, as fully as if set forth herein. In addition the Moderate Density (R-2) Residential Zoning Districts thus established, and/or any subsequent changes to the same which shall be made and established in a similar manner, shall be reflected in the official zoning map of the City as provided in Section 11.11 of this Chapter. Subdivision 3. Permitted Uses The following uses and no other shall be permitted in the R-2 Residential Districts: A. Single Family dwellings, consistent with the City's Mixed-Income Housina Policv B. Two-Family dwellings, consistent with the City's Mixed-Income Housing Policy C. Townhouses, consistent with the City's Mixed-Income Housing Policy D. Foster Family Homes E. Home occupations F. Essential Services - Class I G. No more than one (1) kitchen area and one kitchenette shall be permitted in each dwelling unit Subdivision 4. Accessory Uses The following accessory uses and no other shall be permitted in the R-2 Zoning District: A. Accessory structures, including private garages as defined in this Chapter. Golden Valley City Code Page 1 of 11 § 11.23 Section 11.23: Medium Density Residential Zoning District (R-3) Subdivision 1. Purpose The purpose of the Medium Density Residential Zoning District (R-3) is to provide for medium density housing (up to ten (10) units per acre with potential for twelve (12) units per acre with density bonuses) along with directly related and complementary uses. Senior and physical disability housing is permitted to a density in excess of twelve (12) units per acre or up to five (5) stories or sixty (60) feet in height with a Conditional Use Permit. Source: Ordinance No. 459, 2nd Series Effective Date: OS-12-11 Subdivision 2. District Established Properties shall be established within the R-3 Zoning District in the manner provided for in Section 11.90, Subdivision 3 of this Chapter, and when thus established shall be incorporated in this Section 11.23, Subdivision 2 by an ordinance which makes cross-reference to this Section 11.23 and which shall become a part hereof and of Section 11.10, Subdivision 2 thereof, as fully as if set forth herein. In addition the R-3 Zoning Districts thus established, and/or any subsequent changes to the same which shall be made and established in a similar manner, shall be reflected in the official zoning map of the City as provided in Section 11.11 of this Chapter. Subdivision 3. Permitted Uses The following uses and no other shall be permitted in the R-3 Zoning District: A. Townhouses, consistent with the City's Mixed-Income Housing Policx B. Two-family dwellings, consistent with the City's Mixed-Income Housing Policx Source: Ordinance No. 372, 2nd Series Effective Date: 07-13-07 C. Multiple-family dwellings of up to ten (10) units or less per acre with potential of (12) units per acre with density bonuses, consistent with the City's Mixed-Income Housin_q PolicX Source: Ordinance No. 459, 2nd Series Effective Date: OS-12-11 D. Foster Family Homes E. Essential Services, Class I F. No more than one (1) kitchen area and one (1) kitchenette shall be permitted in each dwelling unit. Golden Valley City Code Page 1 of 5 § 11.23 Source: Ordinance No. 372, 2nd Se�ies Effective Date: 07-13-07 Subdivision 4. Accessory Structures and Uses The following accessory structures and no others shall be permitted in R-3 Zoning Districts: A. Enclosed parking structures similar in construction and materials to the principal structure B. Storage structures similar in construction and materials to the principal structure not exceeding five hundred (500) square feet in area. No accessory structure shall be erected in the R-3 Zoning District to exceed a height of one (1) story, which is ten (10) feet from the floor to the top horizontal member of a frame building to which the rafters are fastened, known as the top plate. C. Private indoor and outdoor recreational facilities, including but not limited to swimming pools and tennis courts D. Underground parking structures E. Other Accessory Structures, as defined in Section 11.03. F. Setback requirements. The following structure setbacks shall be required for all enclosed parking structures and other accessory uses in the R-3 Zoning District. 1. Front Setback. The required minimum front setback shall be twenty-five (25) feet from any front property line along a street right-of-way line. 2. Side and Rear Yard Setback. The required minimum side and rear setback for enclosed parking structures and garbage enclosures shall be thirty (30) feet when abutting any R-1 Zoning District and twenty (20) feet in all other instances. The required minimum side and rear setback for other accessory uses shall be fifteen (15) feet. G. Separation Between Structures. Accessory structures shall be located completely to the rear of the principal structure and no less than ten (10) feet from any principal structure and from any other accessory structure. Source: Ordinance No. 459, 2nd Series Effective Date: 08-Y2-I1 Subdivision 5. Conditional Uses The following conditional uses may be allowed after review by the Planning Commission and approval by the Council following the standards and procedures set forth in this Chapter: Golden Valley City Code Page 2 of 5 § 11.23 A. Residential facilities serving twenty-five (25) or more persons. B. Group Foster Homes Source: Ordinance No. 372, 2nd Series Effective Date: 07-13-07 C. Senior and physical disability housing to a density in excess of twelve (12) units per acre, consistent with the Cit�'s Mixed-Income Housing Policy, or up to five (5) stories or sixty (60) feet in height Source: Ordinance No. 459, 2nd Series Effective Date: 08-12-I1 D. Retail sales, Class I and II restaurant establishments, and professional offices within principal structures containing twenty (20) or more dwelling units when located upon any minor or major arterial street. Any such sales establishment or office shall be located only on the ground floor and have direct access to the street. Source: Ordinance No. 372, 2nd Series Effective Date: 07-13-07 *Re-lettering Source (E): Ordinance No. 459, 2nd Series Effective Date: 08-12-11 Subdivision 6. Buildable Lots In the R-3 Zoning District a lot of a minimum area of fifteen thousand (15,000) square feet shall be required for any principal structure. A minimum lot width of one hundred (100) feet at the front setback line shall be required. Subdivision 7. Corner Visibility All structures in the R-3 Zoning District shall meet the requirements of the corner visibility requirements in Chapter 7 of the City Code. Subdivision 8. Easements No structures in the R-3 Zoning District shall be located in dedicated public easements. Subdivision 9. Maximum Coverage by Building and Impervious Surfaces Structures, including accessory structures, shall not occupy more than forty percent (40%) of the lot area. Total impervious surface on any lot shall not exceed sixty percent (60%) of the lot area. Subdivision 10. Principal Structures Principal structures in the R-3 Zoning District shall be governed by the following requirements: Golden Valley City Code Page 3 of 5 § 11.24 . Sectlon 1i.24: High Density Residential Zoning District (R-4) Subdivision 1. Purpose The purpose of the High Density Residential Zoning District (R-4) is to provide for high density housing (over twelve (12) units per acre) along with directly related and complimentary uses. Subdivision 2. District Established Properties shall be established within the R-4 Zoning District in the manner provided for in Section 11.90, Subdivision 3 of this Chapter, and when thus established shall be incorporated in this Section 11.24, Subdivision 2 by an ordinance which makes cross-reference to this Section 11.24 and which shall become a part hereof and of Section 11.10, Subdivision 2 thereof, as fully as if set forth herein. In addition the R-4 Zoning Districts thus established, and/or any subsequent changes to the same which shall be made and established in a similar manner, shall be reflected in the official zoning map of the City as provided in Section 11.11 of this Chapter. Subdivision 3. Permitted Uses The following uses and no others shall be permitted in the R-4 Zoning District: A. Multiple-family dwellings consistent with the City's Mixed-Income Housina Policy B. Senior and Physical Disability Housing, consistent with the City's Mixed- Income Housinq Policy C. Foster Family Homes D. Essential Services, Class I and II E. No more than one (1) kitchen area shall be permitted in each dwelling unit. Subdivision 4. Accessory Structures The following accessory structures and no others shall be permitted in R-4 Zoning Districts: A. Enclosed parking structures similar in construction and materials to the principal structure B. Storage structures similar in construction and material to the principal structure, not exceeding five hundred (500) square feet or ten (10) feet in height. No accessory structure shall be erected in the R-4 Zoning District to exceed a height of one (1) story, which is ten (10) feet from the floor to the Golden Valley City Code Page 1 of 4 P� D § 11.55 - d. The number of lots to share a common private access drive must be reasonable. e. Covenants which assign driveway installation and future maintenance responsibility in a manner acceptable to the City must be submitted and recorded with the titles or the parcels which are benefited. f. Common sections of the private street serving three (3) or more dwellings must be built to a seven-ton design, paved to a width of twenty (20) feet, utilize a minimum grade, and have a maximum grade which does not exceed ten percent (10%). g. The private street must be provided with suitable drainage. h. Covenants concerning maintenance and use shall be filed against all benefiting properties. i. Street addresses or City-approved street name signs, if required, must be posted at the point where the private street intersects the public right-of-way. H. Hard Surfaces. Hard surface coverage is expected not to exceed the following standards. Uses Maximum Hard Cover Percent Single Family 38% Townhouses 40% Apartments-Condominiums 42% Institutional Uses 45% Industrial Uses ��% Business Uses $�% Commercial-Retail 90% Mixed Uses of Housing with Retail, Office or Business 90% I_Public Space. Properties within PUDs are subject to the dedication of parks, playgrounds, trails, open spaces, storm water holding areas and ponds as outlined in the Subdivision Code, the Comprehensive Plan, redevelopment plans or other City plans. �J Mixed-Income Housina All a�plications for new PUDs submitted after September 19, 2017� shall be consistent with the City's Mixed-Income Housing Policy. 3:K. Public Amenities. All PUD applications submitted after December 1, 2015, shall provide at least one (1) amenity or combination of amenities that total at least five (5) points from the Public Amenity Option table. An applicant may petition for credit for an amenity not included in the Public Amenity Option table that is not otherwise required in the underlying Zoning District; Golden Valley City Code Page 5 of 19 § 11.55 however, if the petition is granted, the amenity may only be allotted up to two (2) points. PUD Amenity Options Points Amenity Standards 5 Green Roof Installation of an extensive, intensive, or semi- intensive, modular or integrated green roof system that covers a minimum of fifty percent (50%) of the total roof area proposed for the develo ment. � . � . 4 Public Open Space Contiguous ground level outdoor open space that is provided beyond the amount of open space required in the underlying Zoning District requirements. The space shall preserve the natural landscape while providing the opportunity for members of the public to interact with the natural habitat using walkways, benches, or other mechanisms. 4 Utilization of a Renewable Use of a photovoltaic or wind electrical system, Energy Source solar thermal system and/or a geothermal heating and cooling system for at least fifty percent (50%) of the annual energy demand in new and existing buildings The applicant must demonstrate that the quantity of energy generated by the renewable energy system(s) meets the required percentage through a whole building energy simulation. Renewable Energy Sources shall be in accordance with the underlying Zoning District and any other a licable re uirements of the Cit Code. 4 Leadership in Energy and The proposed development shall achieve LEED Environmental Design Platinum certification approved by a LEED (LEED) Platinum Accredited Professional (LEED-AP) by a date Certification determined in the Development Agreement. Durin the PUD a roval rocess, the develo er Golden Valley City Code Page 6 of 19 § 11.so Section 11.8 0: Conditional Uses Subdivision 1. Purpose and Intent It is the purpose and intent of this Section to provide the City with a reasonable degree of discretion to determine the suitability of certain uses with characteristics which may be appropriate within a given zoning district but which might have an unusual impact upon surrounding properties or which might otherwise adversely affect the future development of the City or the general public health, welfare, or safety of the property or residents therein. A conditional use permit shall be required for those occupations, vocations, skills, businesses, or other uses specifically designated in each Zoning Use District as requiring such a permit. Subdivision 2. Procedure A. An application for a conditional use permit may be made by any governmental body, department, board, or commission, or by any person or persons, individual or corporate, having a legal interest in the property described in the application. All applications shall be filed with the City Manager or his/her designee in triplicate. Source: Ordinance No. 540 Effective Date: 5-7-81 B. A fee as adopted by resolution of the Council shall be required for the filing of each application. Source: Ordinance No. 573 Effective Date: 8-27-82 C. Each property site shall require its own application. Single applications may not be made for noncontiguous or scattered sites. D. Each application shall be considered on its own merits. E. The City Manager or his/her designee shall refer the application to the Planning Commission. An informal public hearing shall be held on each application within thirty (30) days after submittal of the application to the Planning Commission. F. The applicant and all property owners within five hundred (500) feet of the subject site shall be notified of the informal public hearing by the U.S. mail, not less than ten (10) days prior to the date of this informal public hearing. Such notice shall include the date, time, and place of the hearing and shall reasonably identify the subject site. G. The Planning Commission shall make findings and recommendations to the Council based upon any or all of the following factors (which need not be weighed equally): Golden Valley City Code Page 1 of 3 § ii.so 1. Demonstrated need for the proposed use. 2. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan of the City. 3. Effect upon property values in the neighboring area. 4. Effect of any anticipated traffic generation upon the current traffic flow and congestion in the area. 5_Effect of any increases in population and density upon surrounding land uses. §�6. Compliance with the City's Mixed-Income Housing Policy (if applicable to the proposed use). �7. Increase in noise levels to be caused by the proposed use. �-8. Any odors, dust, smoke, gas, or vibration to be caused by the proposed use. 8:9. Any increase in flies, rats, or other animals or vermin in the area to be caused by the proposed use. 9-:10. Visual appearance of any proposed structure or use. 38-:11. Any other effect upon the general public health, safety, and welfare of the City and its residents. H. The Planning Commission shall present its findings and recommendations in writing to the Council within thirty (30) days following the date of the informal public hearing. I. Upon receiving the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, the Council shall call and conduct an ofFicial public hearing to consider the application. J. Notice of the official public hearing shall be published in the official newspaper of the City not less than ten (10) days prior to the date of the hearing. Such notice shall include the date, time, and place of the hearing and shall reasonably identify the subject site. In addition, copies of the written notice in the form thus published shall be mailed to the applicant and to all property owners within five hundred (500) feet of the subject site not less than ten (10) days prior to the date of such official public hearing. K. The Council shall make findings and shall grant or deny a permit based upon any or all of the factors found at Subparagraph G. above. The Council may make its approval of the permit contingent upon such conditions as it determines necessary to prevent or minimize injurious efFects upon the Golden Valley City Code Page 2 of 3 § 11.90 p�DM�� s-+��--r� nN B. Any subsequent use or occupancy of the land or premises shall be a conforming use or occupancy. C. Notwithstanding subparagraph A, above, the City shall regulate the repair, replacement, maintenance, improvement, or expansion of nonconforming uses and structures in floodplain areas to the extent necessary to maintain eligibility in the National Flood Insurance Program and not increase flood damage potential or increase the degree of obstruction to flood flows in the floodway. Source: Ordinance No. 365, 2nd Series Effective Date: 3-23-07 Subdivision 3. Zoning Map Changes and Chapter Amendments No change shall be made in the boundary line of any zoning district, or in the . permitted and/or conditional use or regulation for any zoning district, except after an official public hearing and upon a majority affirmative vote of the Council. However, the adoption or amendment of any portion of a zoning ordinance which changes all or part of the existing classification of a zoning district from residential, two family residential, and multiple dwelling sub-districts to either commercial, industrial, light industrial, and business and professional offices requires a two- thirds (2/3) majority affirmative vote of all members of the Council. Zoning boundary changes or Chapter amendments may be initiated by the Council, or by petition of affected persons and property owners within the City. Upon receipt of such a petition, the matter shall be referred to the Planning Commission for review and recommendation. The Planning Commission shall conduct an informal public hearing within sixty (60) days of receiving said petition, and after notifying all property owners within five hundred (500) feet of the boundaries of the property involved. Following receipt of the Planning Commission's recommendation, the Council shall conduct an official public hearing within sixty (60) days and make a decision thereon within ninety (90) days. Source: Ordinance No. 271, 2nd Series Effective Date: 11-15-02 A. All eli ibq le a�plications for Zoning Map Amendments must comply with the Golden Valley Mixed-Income Housing Policy Subdivision 4. Board of Zoning Appeals There is hereby created a Board of Zoning Appeals which shall be organized, operated and have certain powers, as follows: A. Organization. Source: Ordinance No. 583 Effective Date: 12-31-82 Golden Valley City Code Page 2 of 7 § 11.90 resolution. A copy of the resolution setting forth currently effective fees shall be kept on file in the office of the City Clerk and open to inspection during regular hours. Source: City Code Effective Date: 6-30-88 Subdivision 7. Comprehensive Plan A. The Council shall adopt, and may from time to time amend, a comprehensive municipal plan pursuant to the authority provided by and the provisions of Minnesota Statutes 473.858 and the related sections of said Minnesota Statutes 473. Before adopting any such plan or any amendment the Council shall solicit the recommendations of the Planning Commission with respect thereto and shall take no action thereon until such recommendation has been received or until sixty (60) days have elapsed since any such request for a recommendation and/or a specific proposal relating to said plan was submitted to the Planning Commission. In considering any such request or proposal, and before adopting any plan or part thereof or any proposed amendment thereof or position with respect thereto, the Planning Commission shall hold at least one (1) public hearing thereon. Source: Ordinance No. 670 Effective Date: 11-15-85 B. Following receipt of the Planning Commission recommendation, or the elapse of said sixty (60) day period, the Council shall upon published notice hold a public hearing with respect to the proposed adoption of the Comprehensive Plan or any amendment thereto and any action taken at such public hearing shall become and be part of the Official Comprehensive Plan for the City provided that a resolution evidencing said action was approved by a two- thirds (2/3) vote of all of the members of the Council. All public hearings as required by this Subdivision shall be held no sooner than ten (10) days after published notice thereof in the official City newspaper in the same manner as applies to the adoption of ordinances relating to or amending the Zoning Chapter. The Comprehensive Plan for the City as adopted pursuant hereto, and any parts thereof or amendments thereto, shall serve as a guide to the City and its public officials as respects future development and zoning actions of and within the City. Source: Ordinance No. 345, 2nd Series Effective Date: 05-25-06 C All eligible a�plications for Comprehensive Plan Amendments must com�lv with the Golden Valley Mixed-Income Policv Golden Valley City Code Page 7 of 7 �x��' �� y ��:; ;,3 �� , %� ��: ,� o,� � �.� :� � � �� , Physic�.l Develo�►�rn.��t �lepartrn.ent �63-593-80951763-593-8i(�9(fax) Date: lanuary 22, 2018 To: Golden Valley Planning Commission From: Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager Emily Goellner, Associate Planner/Grant Writer Subject: Comprehensive Plan Work Session —Land Use Chapter The fourth chapter of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan has been drafted and distributed to the City Council and the members of the Environmental, Open Space and Recreation, Human Rights, and Planning Commissions for review and comment. Please submit comments no later than 4:00 pm on Monday,January 22nd by email or phone. Staff will compile all of the comments and provide a summary with initial reactions at the meeting. An informal Work Session will provide an opportunity to discuss any revisions that should be considered as the full Comp Plan is drafted. Future meetings will cover additional chapters including Water Resources, Transportation, Economic Competitiveness, and a Community Profile. Attachments • DRAFT Land Use Chapter— 2040 Comp Plan (39 pages) LAND USE PLAN DRAFT released January �7, 2018 � OUTLINE Introduction � Key Points � �� Background • Nistory of Development �O� � • Recent Opportunity Areas Existing Conditions p L A N Planning for the Future • Planning Districts • Mixed Use Sites • METRO Blue Line Extension • Future Land Uses • Zoning � • Subdivisions • Redevelopment Areas Policy Plan Implementation Plan • Summary of Implementation Actions INTRODUCTION Golden Valley's Land Use Plan provides a broad outline to direct future land use decisions. It is composed of maps, tables, goals, objectives, and strategies that serve as guides to how the City will maintain and renew itself now and into the future. By maintaining a broad vision of how Golden Valley should (ook, feel, and function over time, the City provides itself with a frame of reference for making individual land use decisions while respecting evolving market trends. Keeping an eye on the "big picture" helps ensure that each new decision fits in with others made before it rather than working at cross purposes. This vision also gives information to residents and nonresident property owners on the expected long-term future of their property and their neighborhood so that they can plan accordingly. In other words, the Land Use Plan offers a means for local government to partner with individual and corporate citizens to manage the pace and direction of change in the city. As Golden Valley continues to evolve as a first ring suburb, there is increasing desire to experience the amenities typically found in a more developed urban landscape. In particular, public feedback and input from City officials support the notion of redevelopment within targeted blocks that encourages or even requires a mix of uses—either within a single building or throughout an area. These types of projects can help provide the appropriate densities, complementary uses, and building massings that support an active and pedestrian-friendly suburban environment. Incorporating language and tools that support this evolution of form is one of the expected outcomes of this Land Use Plan. KEY POINTS • As a fully development community, Golden Valley will need to pursue redevelopment opportunities in order to grow. • The city's four Planning Districts—located along transportation corridors—should absorb most of the anticipated change. • An increase in the locations where mixed use development is allowed could spur new development and provide additional conveniences for residents and workers. • The METRO Blue Line Extension will provide immediate transportation options but the opportunities for associated development may be limited. BACKGROUND Nistory of Development Golden Valley was incorporated as a village in December of�886. At that time, it was primarily an agricultural community consisting of farms, mills, and dairies. In �893, the annexation of o.b square miles of land on its north side resulted in the only significant boundary change in the city's history. Now entirely surrounded by other incorporated cities, Golden Valley is unlikely to see any substantial future expansion of its �0.5 square miles of area. Golden Valley's land use planning history goes back to the�q3os, when the City adopted its first Zoning Code to regulate the development and use of property. Total population was less than 2,000—about 55o families. There were virtually no local business areas and a majority of the land area consisted of farm fields and scattered woodlands and wetlands. The City first adopted an actual Land Use Plan in �959. Population by then had ballooned to �4,500, but an estimated 30°�0 of the city's land area was still undeveloped. General Mills and Noneywell, two of the city's largest corporate citizens today, had only recently been established. Throughout the �q5os and �q6os, Golden Valley recognized the importance or setting aside undeveloped land for parks and golf courses. In the �q7os, this focus shifted to the preservation of natural areas for environmental protection and passive recreation. Golden Valley became a city in �q72 and the development boom leveled off as the supply of undeveloped land dwindled in the �98os. In the�99os, Golden Valley began to turn its attention toward the redevelopment of existing land. A revitalized downtown area was established near the intersection of Nwy 55 and Winnetka Ave. Downtown Golden Valley was planned with an emphasis on providing a mix of housing stock as well as new and innovative retail and business areas. The large residential development of Nidden Lakes was approved in phases in the late �qqos and early 2000s, resulting in the construction of�52 new homes between Sweeney Lake and Theodore Wirth Park. Recent Opportunity Areas In addition to the downtown area, other parts of Golden Valley began to present opportunities for redevelopment in the early 2000s. After the construction of I-3q4 in the �9qos, new land use designations and zoning for mixed uses supported the vision of wholesale change along the north side of the new interstate. The planned reconstruction of Douglas Drive prompted the City to conduct a Corridor Study in the late 2000s to look at opportunities for new land uses along this county road. With the introduction of the proposed METRO Blue Line Extension in the eastern portion of the city in the early 2o�os, the possibility arose of new high-density redevelopment to support the light rail station at Golden Valley Road and Theodore Wirth Parkway. All four of these areas will continue to play an important role in the City's vision of its future. EXISTING CONDITIONS Today, Golden Valley is almost entirely developed with a variety of uses (see Figures X.X: Existing Land Use Map and X.X: Land Uses by Category). In general, the city landscape is dominated by single-family neighborhoods, parks, and golf courses and is divided by two major highways. Two additional highways provide boundaries to the west and south. Several major companies call Golden Valley home and have helped bolster the city's corporate-friendly image at the local and national level. Residential Currently, 36��0 of the city is devoted to residential development. Nousing in Golden Valley mostly consists of detached single-family homes (roughly qo��o of all residential uses). Single- family neighborhoods are located throughout the city and are often separated from each other by the highways and rail corridors that bisect the area. Multi-family dwellings in Golden Valley range from affordable apartments to luxury condominiums. Nigh density housing will continue to be a component of the mixed use areas along I-3q4 and in other locations across the city. While the number of households continued to increase modestly each year through 20�3, the construction of a handful of new apartment buildings beginning in 20�4 has pushed the total population higher, even as the average household size became smaller. Demographic trends indicate an increasing need to accommodate an aging population, suggesting a focus on additional housing for seniors and an increase in the variety of housing options. Figure X.X: Existing Land Use Map (January 20�7) � i m.' � i�� J �� , l�_. � �.��.� ,00��,,�: ,�; � , � , . � ; ;� v. Medicinc Lake Rd � t � ' � ' �S_ i 1'-*'.— — r ' I � � I I � �i�� `� � � �' � � � -�' —� � �� , - - � I � _ I � � � i r l M' � _ � �� . � � �-�� __ i� �� , � ; } � (� � I � `, i � 169 T� i ��. `(_i � � . '.�� ;., ,; i ! , .� � � �� —t � i ulp�l l ��,� 'ir�.�i�,' ptde �1Ia , . . 4 � . _ � �� i ( i i` �� Rd 'b7*�� J 1 � I , � , , �. � , � . �.�_ ''' r „ _ , i � _. - � v � m 5:.3 i � I �[ ` r ._ IC �I �� i i f __ 1 - �V, I � �1 � �� 1 � 1 • � i I L `• � � � ¢ � � � 1•' x:. � �, ._�.,—� � t--..""_ . � " � � J ,}_.' � � � �e"do+a--r�_....,y. : � 1� .e ��. I 7 � � d�� ` �� ` p�s:,X .' ` r� ..� � �s �" � ' .: �*^.-€.-' �,�� . . ,.._ . � _� �� . . . h- . - � �• � � � � 9L� �` i� } � , � � .a „ � .. � �� 55..:. ,.., ' y . .�. � : . _y 1 � .. ' _ -��ys ; � - ''C� i —�.�.,r.G �., � ..�.� . � � m i r � �ehhZya �� I �� pve I _ � _ -`�``� - g �� v 1 �' a � �, c � �'"�" ..'� .�. a O � F .�.� °t � ' � .._' � �g `=�„-u�� i ..,� � `�„ � , � i aY1� � d r , , ``� v, � -- - � � - 169 � j q`',... � � � r � ..�..�. � t7 . s . � �. "� � �` I ., ..... ( ' ,.. �. 100.1 1+ � �� n � � . ' � � ... �, . � __ � . "�. . � . � ,.�. ' t, � � � � � � � � � - �._ �.. s , . L � � . � . I ' � �"� �.-., , . '. K sq � � . i , _ ' � r ...r�.��.�.'a. ' ,. � �' • '"�.u-•_ � _ _. • -_ ' � �� .._ _" _.. ' _ � � � � � i � ij �� "' _.,� '� � � i, y_.�^�•-� �' �•�y Existing Land Use Residential Commercial Institutional Single Family Detached Office Institutional•Assembly $ingle Family Attached(Duplex.Triplex) - Commercial Institutional-Civic Townhome Industria) - Medical � Multi-Family(Apartment,Condo) - Industrial(includes Utility) Other filler Open Space Railroad iiller2 Parks and Natural Areas Right-of-Way(public and private) Open Water — Vacant/Undeveloped � a_ZS a.5 i Mile � I � 1 � I Sources:Hennepin County Surveyors Office for Property Lines(20�7),City of Golden Valley for alI other layers(20i7). Fi ure X.X: Land Uses b Cate or (Januar 20�7) 1% 5 ZQ�o Residential =_r. ■ Commercial , � 36% *� Industrial � Institutional _�«��"`" �� ■ Parks and Open Spaces ■ Water ■ Right-of-Way 18% - ■ Vacant 7% . ;, 5% 7°/a Commercial Commercial development, including retail and office uses, comprises 7% of Golden Valley's total area. Golden Valley is home to several large corporations, including Allianz Insurance, Tennant Company, Noneywell, and General Mills. These corporations account for a large percentage of Golden Valley's job base. Retail development is interspersed throughout the city with concentrations located at the intersection of Nwy�oo and Duluth Street as well as the intersection of Winnetka Avenue and Nwy 55. Redevelopment of Golden Valley's downtown area along Winnetka Avenue and Nwy 55 continues to incorporate functions of walkability. Restaurants, shops, and services are intended to be accessible by area residents through both motorized and non-motorized transportation. Commercial development that operates at a larger scale has been established north of I-394. This area contains numerous auto-oriented uses, restaurants, "big box" retail, hotels, and various office buildings. A number of auto dealerships have clustered and cemented their presence in this area. Industrial Industrial development comprises 22��0 of Golden Valley's total area. It includes some manufacturing-based industry but is mostly light industry and business. Notable industrial areas are located to the west of the downtown, on either side of Douglas Drive near Nwy 55, and south of Medicine Lake Road along the Canadian Pacific Railroad. Some older industrial uses continue to operate in the I-3q4 corridor. Institutional Schools, religious uses, government facilities, and other medical and nursing home facilities make up 5��0 of the city's area. These uses are spread throughout the city and enhance the surrounding neighborhoods. The new Brookview Community Center in Brookview Park represents a significant investment in a facility that will provide a year-round active community gathering space. Parks and Open Spaces Parks and golf courses are integrated into various neighborhoods throughout the city and make up �b��o of the total area in Golden Valley. Theodore Wirth Regional Park, operated by the Minneapolis Park Board, is the largest park in Golden Valley. A new regional park was created in 20�5 through the merger of the Mary Nills and Rice Lake Nature Areas in Golden Valley and Sochacki Park in Robbinsdale. Sochacki Park is managed by the Three Rivers Park District and is jointly operated and maintained by these three entities. Two percent of Golden Valley's total area is comprised of open space and wetlands. These natural resources serve to provide opportunities for passive recreation for residents and visitors. Open Water Golden Valley is home to several lakes and large bodies of standing water, including Sweeney Lake, Twin Lake, and Wirth Lake. Bassett Creek flows through the city from Plymouth in the west to Minneapolis in the east. These water bodies translate to 4% of the city's total area. Right-of-Wax Right-of-way for roadways and railroads accounts for 22��0 of the total area in Golden Valley. Four major highways—Nwys 55, �oo, and �b9 and I-394—traverse the city, in addition to three railroad corridors. While Golden Valley is dedicated to providing good highway and freeway access, it also strives to make itself conducive to bicyclists and pedestrians. In 2o�b, the City Council created a Bicycle and Pedestrian Task Force to examine ways to improve the City's non- motorized transportation network. The results can be found in the Transportation Plan. PLANNING FOR THE FUTURE The Metropolitan Council has designated Golden Valley as an Urban area in their Thrive MSP 204o plan (Figure X.X). This designation helps guide the intensity and location of future development to support the efficient and orderly growth of the Twin Cities metro area. Figure X.X: Community Designation � i �--�..1 i ! , I , � ' i ------� : i -- --r t__—;i-----� i � s �•-� Crystal , ' ' � � �------, r �1- �� f i Robbinsdale ! � I � '�oo r ; � �i _ _-•--------- ---- � '�� i E " I New Hope = ! � i 1 YMed:cino Lake Rd _T- .Y_.s_-_ _ � ,� `\ I �.�.� r'' _ r- � !._..�- • --- � -- - - -- ----- - ._i.�. J , �, �'� I �� - s �; v��'J � �`'�I� � �` �� ; , �� _ ! �' 169 ! �y, �J � a � ��' � � �� (�� a � �� 3� � � � � � �. v'� �� ; -a Va1�7a Rd�� I u 51 � id In � R - ` „ -,-__ }� _ , a � � �. > , � -, � � � � I �_� � I � � � � � �-� ` ; i� - � � � � A � , i ,�, � _ �o` ' -, i _ } J. �,� �a, �i I � � � � , ; , � I c i � » . . I . - , ._ 1t , . , �.._ � `- �� 'r�...�. �' � -� (._tv.. , �, { .o '' I '. � t � . � ��.. ' ,..,s `� �� '� I "--• .,. `. ,,, , . . . . ,^ �-._. -, i� , Ca . r , � . p�p��. � � i • " ' � ' � �c�lde Y�alley ' I ' ��.,_ � t �P... �; `�-¢'� , � i �-- � --- - -a--�.�,- �'� ` i � � .i �._.�_��, . , � '�� ` �� t , � . � �, � . '� �;, 55 - --- � � �'_ � � -. . .,.-- .�'S5 1 � �' � 1 � { � �a , , . �37' .:� G! �t �i _ � A;. ,� ,: e°wo � : i ,��' � pve t�C g� � i i °9',q ; ' �A , , 1' � � ( � ', ° � �! ,,. '-'---- c •�� (-t- � �I i r '- ` {� ��`I ,- C��e�� ti _. 169 , S�,-', \. � _.. r� :.`. � -- �'._"--� ' �. . � I , __ , 1 � � r�"3'' ) �—I � �� 00 "I—' , � � F �_ ��_`.� �� `, ; � t� � - � x. � � _ .�_._. . � � _ , r � , �1 " Minneapolis � ; , �� -------------- � � ,. �. � c� ---�—•-=-- -------- ----- �------ , . �� — :� �J � f �� f r � -I . �' St.Louis Park f`� _,._---_----_--i ,°' � � �----— . ��k:' i_ �*^'=--•- r j � .r-�"'�� 1 l.. . ..... : Regional Community Designation Urban Center Suburban Urban Suburban Edge 0 0.25 0.5 i Mile I � I � I Sources:Nennepin County Surveyors Office for Property Lines(2ot7),City of Golden Valley for all other layers(2oi7). Sharp population increases in Golden Valley are expected to level off in the coming years as the multi-family housing under construction becomes occupied. Even as the boom lessens, services will need to continue to grow to meet the demands that are already evident. New mixed use developments will be incorporated into future plans, supporting expanded transportation options and providing new opportunities for pedestrian activity and public interaction. There continues to be demand for industrial, commercial, and office properties within the city. Several buildings have been purchased and renovated in recent years to meet the needs of new occupants. As many of these high-demand buildings are aging, the City will continue to support owners in their efforts to reinvest in industrial, commercial, and office properties. The City will also investigate ways to ensure that the regulation of uses allowed in these Zoning Districts is striking a balance between current market conditions, property owner preferences, community values, and City priorities. While no historic places have been officially identified in Golden Valley, the City will work to preserve and protect any that are recognized in the future. A number of tools are available for the City to use in implementing the vision described in the Land Use Plan. Planning Districts To aid in planning for redevelopment in Golden Valley, the City has recognized four Planning Districts (Figure X.X). These areas, while loosely bounded, help delineate where redevelopment might occur as well as suggest which parts of the City should be protected from extensive changes. I-394 Corridor The area just north of I-394, between Rhode Island Avenue to the west and Nwy�oo to the east, was guided for Mixed Use in the previous update to the Comprehensive Plan. What used to be a collection of primarily industrial uses has evolved over time to provide large scale retail and office services to the broader community. Menards, auto dealerships, and restaurants anchor the commercial area centered around Louisiana Avenue, while Allianz and the businesses in the Colonnade and the Golden Nills Office Center provide a corporate presence along Xenia Avenue. Large multi-family buildings are also being constructed along Xenia Avenue and Circle Down. The significant new investment in single-use developments hampers the previous vision of this area as a vibrant corridor of smaller scale mixed uses. While some opportunities for redevelopment still exist on the fringes, the majority of the land is likely to remain in its current state for many years to come. Golden Valley will continue to support these large employers and regional commercial destinations while also encouraging high quality reinvestment in the properties that remain underutilized. Figure X.X: Planning Districts � ii� �, .t�'� �.�t i I � �i i'�'. �� 100 !',. ��'a i �. �� , i ; , � i ` Medicine Lake Rd ' � � � � � __ , , _.�_ �� .. _ �- , , � , �� " � � �� ti . -----�� , ' , � � �� , � � � - , ;� ��. ` �__ . , f , ' , _� U � �� _ --�" 11 �'�.'� � � ' � ``"i� �' i �' 169 � � 1 � � { �1� � i - ' � �� T � � a'� — � � �. � � �� . , st � - ad'�� '.� . olden V e � _. � . a� � i i � i A � � > r '� � � � ' . . -i� --� � , � i � ��_. � -�� i , � i �� ,,� -� �, � � 11� � ( � - ' . - -- � - �_� . �� 1 1 �� i� � � . n.`s �� - '- � � y, '� E . {._ �,rn � 3 i � � 3 �_ - l, I i i� r i� , , - - . . - � � � � _ ��r�'�ir , ;.�5��.r��'`� !'� i `�� _�� oao� � _� ' J l M ,�- .. � I � x..,. .,...�.. � � � - � ' r�f �rr_ �� _� ' � `�, _ �� ,-- ��. '� � ,� � , � _ : � � -. 5 . i �� — � � � � �. ■ _ --.--�=--_. — _ . � a _ _ _ � . _ . ,. , �. tw � � _ — � � � � '" i . � � � 55 G - i / � 4 - � , ' � m 11r feh�r I ' , � 1 �. .� ��,.�`/�� r uo�, � � /" ;`�.aI, �,l � pve. F "�"�". �-..:�� tly dbX . .. � �L � \�� / � � 6�.�d0� 1'41' _ i : m FI I r; �� ,i i—._. i. � .-. .. G,\ � � i r �.� � 169 c C �.. �t , .:: _.. .�_�_�_� � -'_� � __ l I �a� ii __,� .. t I �, � � +�, 1�.� � � t � � 100) �_ � ._� . � -. . . , . -. C: i� � I � •C . ..I. .� � � ,�. � � _ . - . � , �� , - mS ' • . '� - . . - '�r I � �� . X -� t , ,� , s i' � . ' � �� — ,1� i , .. r� . --.�.. . - .� ___ � ��k j` - . . � J� , `i �� ! - -----,•'---� $�,_ ; • � • - , .. � _i_ 4 Planning Districts �n�y� *��F� Planning District 0 os5 0.5 i Mile 1 i 1 � I Sources:Nennepin County Surveyors Office for Property Lines(2017).City of Golden Valley for all other layers(20�7). Douglas Drive Corridor Douglas Drive between Nwy 55 and Medicine Lake Road was reconstructed in 20�6 and 20�7. In anticipation of this work, the City conducted the Douglas Drive Corridor Study in 2009 to develop principles to guide redevelopment and to prepare a concept plan. The land uses that were suggested included employment-heavy campuses to the south and activity nodes to the north and east along Duluth Street. With renewed interest in the corridor and the opportunity for new development, Golden Valley is poised to implement many of the recommendations from the corridor study. This includes the creation of mixed use nodes at Golden Valley Road and Duluth Street as well as future redevelopment at Duluth Street and Nwy�oo. Downtown West The 2o�os saw increased interest in the area west of the city's downtown, roughly bounded by Nwy�69 to the west and Nwy 55 to the south. New residential buildings and reinvestment in commercial properties have added energy and activity to an area that is still dominated by light industrial uses. �---- ,.�.---- �.__-� � _ �r_____—.._----_..--.----- _ � � --.. .� � .�- -. . -� -t� ; � ..� . _�� -� �� , � � a ,�. � � ..._ � _ . � ■ .._ � ; � � � � , o E, '_.� _ � � J � y < < * � � � . . _�= ... . ..� � r� � � � _ �J`,� � .��. �_, -- � : f�� -� d�✓ � � . 1 ,, �y' � ' �� ? �� ... . ., . :.. q yy,,. .. � '�.��. ��T�a�� "R; i ti� - 1�r ' . ,.",��a'�ii... �I � . . �` T r. . � � '. .., t � .� . �;� - . ,, • , '1. . �":� � i "�' t . �EYEWEAfl ,� , � `" N { , �� . �� . a . _ " -. �.n��\I ,.�u�, raponnr �" ; -,_ .. , . � . . c ��! • � � �� "� ��.' As part of the creation of the Nighway 55 West Redevelopment Area, the City committed to providing public infrastructure in the form of sidewalks, street lights, and buried utilities in an effort to extend the current downtown further to the west. Additional study of the whole downtown will examine ways to provide greater flexibility in the establishment of new business and enhanced site standards for new construction. Golden Valley Road Light Rail Station Area While still waiting for Federal funding, the proposed METRO Blue Line Extension has been planned and includes a light rail station in the southwest quadrant of Golden Valley Road and Theodore Wirth Parkway. The established single-family neighborhoods surrounding the station limit the possibility of wholesale change in the near future, but targeted opportunities may emerge to increase intensity on key properties and to support the ridership and utility of the light rail line. <� "�u § E `„��; � �,�.;i ��r,��wta�� '��,�`��c 'x� � � , e�'. �,Y, �;,�`��x;;��,� �' k 9 �� #'+7 s � 9y � -0� � < .'.1.. �`. ��.�h��'-. . "_ �n �«T' -R� s . � y.�'� . . .�_ � ,� �-- �— .�r,'�� '_ �� _ ;. ,�r �, . � � '�'� _ . .. . . . t` _, r . � . , � � � �'' s��f t�.• -- � � y� ,'� .. . .. t r� � :"� ,,- � .St�t? u::Pt� � ` � _ ,.,�-�+ ...... ,� ,.... ,_ . .�.�. ,_ .� � —`� _.� -3�: .°`:. 'k. t ,��,++*.,� ,, � .�. � S_��j��. ... .> ��' . � . . -�Y� fY� '�- ��_ �" � ,�• ,4 ' � wr- � �__ The City has partnered with Nennepin County through its Community Works program to explore possibilities for future redevelopment in this area. Mixed Use Sites A number of sites across Golden Valley have been identified as potential locations for redevelopment (Figure X.X). These are not the only possible areas of change, but due to circumstances such as proximity to major roadways, the age of existing structures, or shifting market forces, these are logical places to focus attention. Many are suitable for a variety of uses mixed side-by-side (horizontally) while a few may be appropriate for a mix of uses within buildings (vertically). Figure X.X: Mixed Use Sites � �: _ . -..-_.._..____-------- �r: i = , �:== _ j � i I � `t�� = � � , �� , .,.: :.: ,�� ,... ., . �..:_ � 5i�`- . . ; .� : -t..�---, -�_ � _ _ . �� , .. _, : � _ , '"-- � _ : : i. . _ . . � � �� + : •__. �c i_`� Y ` �� ! �. C:.� x � . I� E � . _ - . . ...� l, �. . �,,y^ r�"'s. 7. �S�� '� - 4 �, _. � �� .. � � . , � .- � �.,� �,. � �' , .; � , ' * `� � j ..� { .. . 4 ''<.;:c�� R, . ��''"�l. "_� �.-_ \' i. � ?� - . � � _ ... ` �� _ ' , i' ! s� . -g . _ � x �- �� y. _ _= < ; , � ' : :- • il _ ; _ � . . '.�-� �; � i � ' : �i , _ _ �... , ° �- : _.. ' ;� �� ' --_�� _ - _ _ � _ , - :�. � � . . � , � . . __ � . � �,,, � � ' y,�:�,_�, , I_._;�� '� _._._._._ . a._�_;,.--- � ` ` 'I I � y ----��_. ; '� _ � x�� '� _ _ _ . , . a : � _ _ _.:.� � - . _ � � _. � .� _ _ .; , µ , ; � , _ :._ . � �.�_ . s �� i ...... _.. . � ._ _ . .. ' La I .: � �ai � dl �"..,4° r... . ? .� xg��. . ��.:� � , �= � . ..__ , , _ "�",f, . . � �•....� .. � � .�.J'^�.v . � � �".: ,' C ti'y�f"' �.._. .. � _�.=._s.-'_..� � i � = . 3 _ -�,..... �. � � = g . � ;� ' •� _ �.. : _ :,,qp�� . , � _ '_' : . - : • . . , � �-.. ' � � ..-�... �� ' � � � ... �. . - .,.. �_ .: ��k.�. ' "" y �� . . • � - _. ._. .: .. i: . . .. ,.- � �-� ... . �c . ._. . _. E.. ...... # ; � .. ... � � � _ ._._ y,..:-, i �� .� � � � I� . i � ... i �. a ._ ..a; �- "'-'-s._.-'-_._..iaea-.f-.a�--'-'-"----'�: -"�'--'- -"-'---L�.__ . _._., . , � I: : _.,, . .._ �......— _.. i . .,., .. ,�= = - . _.K j a,. _. �_. , _.. r . � �\. ' ' �.. . I EIO1M R �� ..�._' .... � L� l..�it _:_.J � ✓_..,_.--.� The City has categorized these sites as primarily intending to serve either the immediate neighborhood or the wider community via access from major roadways. The �4 areas are described below: A- Scale: Communit � 1 ' y ��; a �� .�.,� a . � � � , � � � Residential Target: 75% ��, r '", � �. � G+: � 'f�� • A mix of high density residential, � retail, and office uses i A • Connections to the downtown and � points east and north via sidewalks � � �_� � � � ''' and on-street bicycle lanes � �,�y � ' j a T+�� .�.1�,��",'wi ,cs . .. �d • A c c e s s t o N w y 5 5 a n d N w y�6 9 , �l� Z � �Y i '� a � : � � _ � . j N.�a I�•SS �. I a: B -Scale: Neighborhood Residential Target: 50��0 �; • Opportunity for a vertically mixed �' use development with residential �,y _ over commercial �'� ` • Close proximity to existing � _ � � shopping and services � - Jt a , ., ' ' :,y,� '� � ,�-,, �� - - - I .� -�.�.,� ,er�t �" ti. ¢.'' , . �:;. C - Scale: Neighborhood ` � �� - , . ` ,� Residential Target: 50��0 � : � � ' � , =�.�r � L� � .._w,, ,:� v� - , a - - �,1 i: _. p�_ • Long term redevelopment that '�'�� ' includes medium to high density F � �`�� +� residential, such as senior „ _ T , . i�� apartments �Q`-' • Close proximity to existing shopping and services � • Preservation of a public space ° R� F south of the Luce Line Regional � - - �� Trail a priority • Opportunity to turn adjacency to Q Bassett Creek into an asset " � b- ,�• .. 4� f ;:;{ D - Scale: Neighborhood ' Residential Target: 50°�o t�. ' � �5 -..r�AY� � r � � � ��k� � �' • Medium to high density residential and ' ' � L:a� v� commercial uses `-�� `� � • West side of the block should serve as a ' 4_�..': .�; transition from the single-family � '___�_ neighborhood • Long term opportunity to provide a mid- block terminus to an extended Market St ` ♦ to the east ':: � a,.... i �'°Y�'i4'��.,= .. .. r,. � ... ,�.},.r :v.g, ... . c35sa. ..�c. E - Scale: Community - � - Residential Target: 50��0 �� `�� ,� 1��f�r�9 ``'� � .� � � ��°F Pon�d > '.. �. • North side should serve � " `�' ��' as a transition from the �� _.; single-family and open ' space usesacross Laurel Ave p E • Chance to extend :n Market St to the west - > � to Pennsylvania Ave � • Convenient access to I- = � 394 ,� � � �.; � ' ""':'� , 4 :'.tit Y IL"'�`^t� ,�Wx rF�: �} . :s .�. � aU.� i �� 'r :�� -__ _,.. �.. __ ,� ,. ,. . .....a_.>. .. .._ �r. F -Scale: Community Residentia) Target: o��o �r�en#ae� • New commercial uses , , - �•..--.� �i�-� - -+ � � � ,� _.__ • North side should respect the open � spaces across Laurel ;�� t Ave ,� • Convenient access to I- 4' 394 �� ,,�ti�i� �e ,;; �,.: ,:� �, � � �H .. ,� =-=-_-�__-_ _�� u� � �y�i�ir�� x p� ,;Y�„� ----------��--��a� .—•-�--------- _ G - Scale: Neighborhood � ' '' , , .x _ l t , _ ._� _ ;__ . ; Residential Target: 50��o Hills Dr � ' �,. � _ l �'n • Potential redevelopment that respects the single-family neighborhood to the north '�'��`-" �� " ` ' ' � ;.,- f=x I -�� , �� Y ,� � ' �:= : �w:;r . �-----=-`----------- H - Scale: Community Residential Target: 25��0 ,� ,� � �'- • Job-focused redevelopment aF��"�+' '- "�;�' ,'� �- � ;-- : � • Potential for luxury residential uses adjacent to the golf course • Chance to construct new frontage road and reestablish access between Douglas Drive and Country Club Drive • Access to Nwy 55 � �� -. ., , .:r,eh .�r ! s ,. i .._ , - g�+,�,�• f j .. ., ..:: - i.., . ._:�.,�,. t I - Scale: Community � Residential Tar et: o��0 4 '�' g � `t ,sj�,f�,�if, ,, � , _ ' • Job-focused redevelopment . �� , • Access to Hwy 55 � � ��,� ' ` �': '; ,;;, C � '��. �� Illa ��,��+: �ki� 'i I I �i' 'xN�u.,�• .. ,_ _ S F� '` � J - Scale: Neighborhood `' C .-� Residential Target: 75% �a� - �-Y .� � �:. � . a�� , : • Nigh density residential, such as senior �� +� � apartments, with commercial uses � ,-., �� " 0 � J � � � � � ; :,�� K-Scale: Neighborhood Residential Target: 50��0 _ . ;� t �4 i � ��.. .�� • A mix of retail and residential uses _. � K h_ � �" _i � `, � ; � .. . x. I�' ��_T��C[,�E ` # � � , � - Yt'1'� � °� ,_ry_ �a. '�. tl C� ,� �'��,, ( �c�_. I L -Scale: Neighborhood R,� � Residential Target: 50��o t� �� l� � �� 1(� • A mix of retail and residential uses L ��i��r; �, ; �� ; M - Scale: Community ' I �" ' ; � ;' Residential Target: 25��0 �, __.� � � ` ' � �� I -� ;. � L �� J � f -�-��`�� `�--�-�_ ae��, ` �,�-`�Wes _ro?r �-�..�___, � • Long term opportunity for -' � �r�ft,._ � ` ' .. _ a mixed use — .Are<; redevelopment ��'' � �'°'"'`-' � • North side should provide �� - J a transition to the adjacent �>' single-family neighborhood `� ��SS�Etf � Cr�ek M • Convenient access to Nwy ,� ioo Natu�e � ;: ��"�c� '` � �. � D�1u1tt� �. . -:�'�i.•ii.t �.��uti..�. iY�� i-G�ifV �� ` C o;:,'t:�� C3�g�, � � __� �� ' � ! '` � ' '��` �� _ � �.� �; , ~-T- � N - Scale: Neighborhood �� r��,ve:---- ` ,�:;k ," ;; t��,,.._�_��. , �I Percent Residential: 75% �� ', GT�nytebV d� } � �'�"� T�'�"I'c�3 Ce' h` ,'�-,�- � • Potential for high density ��' - Pdrk ---'�--- 'q : residential redevelopment that `: � '; �1� 4�1' supports light rail �� t��.��"`�; ' • Possible partnership with an � � institutional use �. �s'��,�`s,� _' • Should respect the open space �� N t �:�oa�� to the north and west, as well as ��;�_ "� �,,�,�ay fit within the context of the �� „I�'+�+`"�' ,�� surrounding single-family � �� ,�`�'��'� neighborhoods �< � ��' � �� _ ` , �� ; '�� z� �_, . �fi�� v�� .� ,- ,�� -- �� -, � ��. r METRO Blue Line Figure X.X: Planned METRO Blue Line Extension Extension The planned light rail project, the METRO Blue METRO Blue Line Extension Line Extension, includes 69 (Bottine2�u LRT) two proposed stations January 201T Operation and Maintenance located within Golden Facility(OMF) Valley (see Figure X.X). L-� Oak Grove Parkway Both stations are surrounded by park land g3rd Avenue O 9JNOA4'E 67� ; a�e2.�ostano��9hiRafl and single family o w Alignment neighborhoods, limiting the 86th Avenue a a BS,�p.E E•;ymQs+.�,�^ potential—at least in the $ � Light Rait Stations fi N O C1 O 5 7 � near term—of significant ' � � � � � "" ' M aes redevelopment at the level Brooklyn Blvd ��oa ' of intensity needed to m �''6 Yf Q support light rail. �p � `� � �e� � � � �. The Plymouth 63rd Avenue Avenue/Theodore Wirth `��T��¢k�, Park station (Figure X.X) Bass Lake Road , will be constructed off the �rs' � +� Plymouth Avenue bridge as -- u��-�E �ana AVE it crosses from Minneapolis = �' `' � Robbinsdale � into Golden Valley near the p Theodore Wirth Chalet. � s�`� New trail connections will �' � be constructed as a art of �°a P Golden Valley Road ��Fnv�i`EyRn �\ g\a the project, including a new j" P�'� �r``� e�`�� Plymouth Avenuel o CCOSSICIg Of B85S@tt CI"22k. Theodore Wirt�h Park Q�c Ja� ,�a��' � C_5:. I:EM1I n�1.. as � T�c J4.��11 ��G� �J �11 Ult Gtld�C i.C�1 ��h5 h' T urban neighborhood with ssa _ , low potential for change ,� � given the presence of �`y �' Theodore Wirth Park and stable neighborhoods east of the station, including the Nomewood Nistoric District. With an approximate station area population of 3,700 (located primarily in Minneapolis), the station will be an origin for riders who will arrive on foot, by bus, or by bicycle, and a destination for many users bound for the multitude of Figure X.X: Plymouth Avenue/Theodore Wirth recreational opportunities available at park Station Area Theodore Wirth Regional Park. Almost , � . _ ` ry � �� Y�, "re7'•�7 I�j'�,�i all of the land in Golden Valley within �� a�� `'�°� m , � �;x;�-,-�, ,r -� � the station area is guided for Open `-�.��;� ��,g�'`� � �� a;,, . � :�;,�`�`^��'' � � Space. There is also a strip of � ',Y �� ' ~.�x �`"�'"��''� ; ?'� ��; �. resi den tia l uses a lon Xerxes Avenue. �:r 1°o� `+ � �� `� "':;�}� g ,�r�' �� t�+��y�.w i� � x • . {4+�ry'Y > y Y�.� 1�, ' The Golden Valley Road station : �y � ��` ' y ` ,:� �'� � � .�, ; . �� .v � �,., (Figure X.X) will be constructed just "�` � � N� = p �;� �� :x,� �. . .� v �� ,.e'tt,�. south of the Golden Valley Road n Theo�i4re Wirth i�� `�` �. �''� -� �' `��z brid e as it cross the rail tracks west � � Regiona�Park �4'� `�;� ' }�`� -�� g �� n - , � . (R4pfs Park&Rec 8osrdJ r � RCt j� ^� � .�. of Theodore Wirth Parkway. A modest �� ' " �� , "> ��.�"..�, , �, �.��` K,b.,� � park and ride will provide spaces for � � ��"��' 't' ,;., �I � � � . , , & Rr "� '�`t�`t�i i!� �*°xm s,a those boarding the train or using the t� : •�� , � � �Y�471 M�,� � t , ,�;; . a z; �� . ,�,,FiN ;.'+ t o �7 ;�.y��,�. parks or trails in the area. Bus service � � . �x` �� ' � ��,� �.�.;i� alon Golden Valle Road will serve �. ��. . �� r b '�� ;� .�,r.�,, g Y '� a�r p.�,,,� �,,,�� , ;{ �,..� ,�� "*,�: the station from the west and the east. ,�• a �_ = �.';-� ;� � � , �, A new trail connection, positioned � �,� - �7� �"L� � . �.�; � t� west of the rail line, will provide a new ,: p � �� ' . l�K y� �'�' grade-separated connection beneath �`�" �� j � � '' l -i' �-',�. ti � ��;` �� '� �, �, Golden Valle Road to link Theodore �� a�•�.`�,,.�� y ,� � � � �,., � , Wirth Park to the south with Sochacki `' ' ' F �4 , � ;,;;.�;� UI.'JN . �... t � Park to the north. - ' "` ';�; �. ��_; ��; � ; , ��k � � , � �t ��r �`�� S . 1t, � . The primary feature of the station � ,' ' � . '�� `� t�� area is the abundance of adjacent "� -- �`—��65 �5° -`�"° �� - - _ �"` parkland, including Theodore Wirth Regional Park and Parkway, Sochacki Park, Glenview Terrace Park, and Valley View Park. The community values the parkland and recognizes that it is a critical component of the station area character. The station area is a single-family suburban neighborhood with low potential for change given the many parks and the stable neighborhoods surrounding the station. Major healthcare providers located to the west along Golden Valley Road may benefit greatly from the new station. The station will be an origin for transit riders who arrive on foot, by bus, and by bicycle, or who are dropped off by car, as well as a destination for nearby healthcare providers and park users. A majority of the land within the station area is guided for Open Space or Low Density Residential. The property on which St. Margaret Mary Church is located may provide the best future opportunity for redevelopment in support of the line. A high density residential use, either alone or in combination with an institutional or small commercial partner, is appropriate for this location. This site has been guided for Mixed Use on the Future Land Use Map, but may remain in its current form until property owners wish to pursue a change. Figure X.X: Golden Valley Road Station Area Other blocks of single-family - �. ;k ��, q � , �; homes to the east of the station $� ° �; �� " ' � .-�' �rv� ma become ri e for residential � ' �" � ��`��`��'�I�'��'� _ ' k'�� Y p �� v�� '''� .,�;,�r �.�� , �;,° , _ � ., redevelopment at a higher ,� , t `' '� �` q� _ '� ' ,� t �. density. Until property owners �� -,�� K �� 4 �� ' � �a,�� ''�'�� 4 �. . ,tPrr" . . '�'�� Vrew Park are interested in undertaking a � P`- rv s, ' ,� '� �,PR�� .,� ,� ,' � � 4 y . coordinated effort to intensify � �" �� ' �° �>�°' �;e1,,�, � `• • �` � � s�.. � �� -� ,�, �,��. i .+ . - .f�: �i . Teria� N .�a :?.�� ,,g,�.. this area, the pattern of low ��"x ¢- '� �� . �,� 2 _ _� � �`�; density housing will remain. � . - . �;, � _ ��'��=��`� "�`�'� ,., :� q �,��' : . , � �-�:.� �� ;x�� a � , ,� � � �• � � �w,F�°,��':�i�� re,�_ �� Preliminary Station Area Plans � � �L� � '� ,,��.'�i �"':��` ��t ��-a �= c p!y _., > , '�G"°° ^t `" �3_ for the Plymouth � ` � � � �� ' y �;i x` ' 1 ,�,,,'�,�, ., � �� .� � �`� � Avenue/Theodore Wirth Park ' ��:�«�-: . s�� '�� '� ��' ,, 5 ��a > ,,� and Golden Valle Road �� ' �`' f ��N � �� Y �` ,iit�r-��•�� stations can be found in °�,� in�� '' �e�`� � ' � '� �"��" �";;� � � � �� Appendix XX. � s�s,;L�� r� "�� "'-, �,r��zi. ., ' � .� ��z� , � �� s T;.* � �� , � �' �% � K :�z t �;-�_ � � . � ' �� Tvt`�., ° �a �;� � k��.� �� ' '�" £ � q� * 1' �.. 01: .,�: :,�...#� J�, u :.� '2� -4 '2'i x f --a '�... ae�' {,j,� ..- .. � e .�:: 'i :9 �.;��. ^� 7 � rp }. 5�.� �.,�! (5 "P.. 4. .'*. '�. B � . ,�"• „ff"'�R4f'l _ " � Th@QLPo/e Warfh �� 8 N �I '.i� , �.�.4.;� � -- - a'= Regional Park �"''�. �'" � �:+�� r," .�_ ��i � �r �. (A9� ecBo�r � � �r,� � � �� H . 3 �.�l��. ... _ . . . Future Land Uses The Future Land Use Map (Figure X.X) provides a picture of the desired future land uses across Golden Valley. Consistent with the vision of residents, property owners, and policy makers, the plan strives to focus redevelopment at the edges of single-family neighborhoods and along major transportation corridors. In order to provide residents with convenient access to neighborhood retail and office uses, mixed use sites are located at points throughout the four Planning Districts. A vast majority of the land uses shown on the Future Land Use Map remain unchanged from the map shown in the previous plan. Areas where changes have been made include those within the new mixed use sites, the intensification of properties at the north end of Douglas Drive, and the change of a number of properties north of I-394 from a Mixed Use classification to either Commercial or Office. Figure X.X: Future Land Use Map i k� � , - �•-- ---r i � �ri F � ji �oo .=�I 1 I i � �� I� I `i ` Medicine Lake Rd I � _ ��. � �l I . . '�, � �, , .. . . �.. .. - � .. .f i .3 , -�"' , — J I t � t%R � .,."t"� � K , . I > �.��^�l^�'�i'�{ ' r � � � i � ; � � � � � _ x.� r� � j� � t i�„" � _ . � ' 4..� � ,� � , �� i �es r � � � i � . � �' i � i� � r„��, � , -. _ •.� , � � -1 , .._. � i , pulN 'i� , � ��'Cjold�n VaI�e,Rd I ��.�y„ '�� _. , � ° --- — � . . � � , g � ( � _'- � `�" I � `�x,� . � � �-�� L+�c �- �-,1� ��' ' '.�.� � �_� ). � �` �� - I � i�-I—� _ 1 �G F �tI� �� . . ��o.�� . .:c -._�+ . . � ti.. � i w � . ' � ,� / i ' ' 'A r I „ i. � � - , r � r �� , � � � +. / �� 1 e., ,��,,,�� _ .,. � � , , � I � . � � � T� � aorm �� .,� ��` � - -� •,-��_ .,�..-.,-�,_, � � ' ��--•� i � � _ _ , ,. -- � r � � � i � __N,_.-�'''� , s '�' �r'� ,�.�� .,��,� � � ��w � �``� ��, ,��.,� ,��. � � �, � � � ,�:' � , �� ; � m� �!e � � �^ � �"'o >�� /�J � � � �pve I ; _ o - -- g �^_�� bir- r;' 1 1 � . -------�- '�i �� , . `Bn,N . j /� � � �O y r .�j , rt-� -.__.,. .�- i. � � �,"$" � - ,�a � r ' 169 � � Q `�� '3 �: � .. .-h ., ._ —'-_'-.... � � �� Q% 100 � � . -. � I 'V.. _ - C .__..� � �_./._ Y . . --- � � . �� r . I � i � ` _� �i � .�S' �� ... , x� r '� �, , , i �_ � , � � . . _.. _� �� ti� . ..__�-__a.�. _ _ �._ , . , � - ---_......�_ . � ,_� •. � � -� d �� i� ` ` �� - �' � � � .r� , _` �._� , �, -- I y._,_ J —'� Future Land Use Residential Mixed Use Industrial Institutional Low Density Neighborhood Light(ndustria) Assembly Moderate Density - Community Industrial Civic Med��m Dens�ty Commereia) Open Spaee - Med�cal - High Density Office �s Parks and Natural Areas Right-of-Way - Retail/Service Water Feature � Railroad Right-of-Way(public and private) O os5 0.5 i Mile 1 � 1 � 1 Sources:Hennepin County Surveyors Office for Property Lines(20�7).City of Golden Valley for all other layers(20t7). Figure X.X: Future Land Use Changes in 204o Plan i ' , .� -- -- —•�.;J �— � �, � ! ii--T _'�—' � i ,o0 1 �� i i� � f. �_� � , I �� I ' �`! � i �" Medicino Lake Rd � ` , � � ��'\ � , � � —L f' .�. . '�"" � .� ' � � ' �1' '� � -------� �� . � � � - ; , � � � � I � � : _ i , , �'� . ,� __� �� ,_1 �''ti i ; - . � .� �,, ,�.�-r� �; � _, � , � � * _, __ '� �� . l�,�� -.� ! r �, � , 169 �I , • � f , ��'�� uluth St �-� ,:. ; �otdea Val�'e '{ )�. '�� !* � -� - � R�d �, � - ._._ a . � _� �I'V -i , � � '� ��-_� � , �_ �� _, � °. � a � � .. � t � -+ � . �. ��--i F ,) '`' z;a `` , � i_, .( � � .- _ � ' �, �--� , a._ i �m i ( .. ._ , � - w - � � ; _ i �._y J y _, .. — � � � r " �� 1 � � � �� t I _ � � „ � � `--' � q � � a� do� � � �� ' r _ _ ' , i r � e . ,� �^• � �� . � �'��. e° I � � � �._ i r ^-'-.,� - r� � ;-- � „,. � � _ ,� _ , � • i ' -,� � � � w ti � � � r� � � ��*n-.�.,,� , � . , :__ _ � - 5 I ,. � . �.� . . �,� .... _':�:. � - �--_- ��:.: . ,55, . �� .... � ,.. ". �-' > � � � I m' �l � m � ,' i ehy,o , 5�y I �I � p.ve I <� ' 04;�� ) \'j ( �r'�� _j �o° I i .7, � _ -------- , . � r , gr �+ � � � ,� .�_-._� r� , .,, �;�� '.� - Cy� � �`� d - � `',�. ,� 169 Uy � � r �.� _-�.,___ _�I_-.��_.%rGi ', -+-.---'--•� � ' / � � r � . � � � � {� �ool � ' i- �j� i aQ I � a �, t< <€ ! i i �.� ' � . - _�.'.. . � . � � ' i� r+}, � • � C i . d � � ' ' �. � I � . �(. � � 1� � i..�'�.'�'.� ` _ ___' ,..... : ..i... . .�' i ' .��.�a. ��.. � � . . . � "_"'__'.�'..-.. .. �_� . � � � � �;.'�:' ' r ,_. � � _ L ,��' It r�._..�.._. ._._� y_�:..--_' � � �� * _. Changes in Land Use Land Use Changed 0 0.25 0.5 �Mile L � 1 i 1 Sources:4lennepin County Surveyors Office for Property Lines(20�7),City of Golden Valley for all other layers(2077). The land use categories in the plan are rather broadly defined; while general descriptions are provided (Table X.X), they do not cover every possible use or situation, leaving room for interpretation when a specific use is not clearly documented or occurs under special circumstances. Table X.X: Land Use Descri tions Residential Residential, Low Density This category includes primarily single-family detached (up to 5 homes per gross acre of units, but may include single-family and two-family attached land area) units in scattered locations as appropriate.This land use should be surrounded by other land uses with minimal im acts, such as institutional and o en s ace. Residential, Moderate This category includes single-family detached homes and Density two-family attached and detached homes at a moderate (5 to 8 homes per gross acre of density. This land use can provide a variety of housing land area) types while acting as a buffer between low density residential uses and commercial, office, or institutional uses. Residential, Medium This category includes townhomes, apartment buildings, Density and condominiums at a medium density or senior facilities (8 to 2o homes per gross acre of at a higher density through a Conditional Use Permit. This land area) land use can be located in a wide variety of locations in the city and can act as a buffer between residential uses and other land uses. Residential, HigM Density '$' Apartment buildings and condominiums are the (2o to ioo homes per gross acre of predominant high density residential uses with senior land area) facilities allowed at higher densities in some locations ...�._... . , through a Conditional Use Permit. This land use is generally (ocated near commercial, office, or institutional uses with access to multi-modal options. Mixed Use Mixed Use, Neigf�borhood This category includes a mix of uses including medium density residential and neighborhood-serving commercial, � ' ` ` � - office, and institutional uses at a scale compatible with the surrounding neighborhood they are intended to serve, which is typically a small, moderate, or medium scale. These areas allow for both vertical and horizontal mixed ... , ,. . � use and does not require a mix of uses within every buildin . This category includes a mix of uses including high density residential, commercial, office, institutional, and light industrial uses that serve the local market area and support the community. These areas include freestanding businesses, sho in areas, em loyment centers, and housing that promotes community orientation and scale. These areas are envisioned as compact urban development areas that serve as a gateway to the city and as an activity center for the community. These areas allow for both vertical and horizontal mixed use and do not re uire a mix of uses within ever buildin . Commercial Office This category includes offices for administrative, professional, and clerical services.This also includes medical or laboratory facilities where work is performed in a predominantly office setting. This land use is located near commercial, institutional, and high density residential areas and enerates em lo ment in the communit . Retail/Service This category includes land used for the provision of goods and services, which encompasses a large variety of establishments such as shops, restaurants, medical offices, hotels, and entertainment facilities. This land use is located near high density residential, office, and institutional uses while generating employment and providing services in the communit . Industrial Light Industrial This category includes industrial uses that are less impactful than general industrial uses, such as packaging and processing, light assembly and manufacturing, offices and showrooms, and warehousing.This land use is located near industrial, commercial, and office uses and generates em lo ment in the communit . Int�ustria) This category includes general industrial uses such as . �� _ _. � � ... ,_... .,,,; manufacturing, assembly, processing, laboratory, distribution, and related office uses. This land use is generally located near light industrial, commercial, and office uses and enerates em lo ment in the communit . Institutional Assembly This category includes education facilities at all levels, the cemetery, places of worship for all denominations, and miscellaneous reli ious installations. CiviC This category includes administrative or service installations (except those otherwise classified) at all levels � ,: , of overnment. t ti�a = This category includes hospitals, surgical centers, nursing homes, or rehabilitation facilities. Right-of-Way ��t,� � "" This category includes all land reserved for railroad uses. �jY; , {a�� By definition, all such right-of-way is considered to be "in _ .i...,. rr use. Road This category includes all land reserved for street or highway uses and for certain transit facilities. By definition, all such ri ht-of-wa is considered to be "in use." Parks and Natural Areas This category includes open spaces that are utilized as golf courses, ball fields, playgrounds, parks, nature areas, � � stormwater ponding areas, and other undeveloped remnants. This does not include vacant land that is envisioned for other uses in the future. Open Water This category includes open waters such as Sweeney/Twin Lake, Wirth Lake, and Bassett Creek. By definition, all open water is considered to be "in use." Although the Land Use Plan guides some areas for change (shown as differences between Existing and Future Land Uses), the timing of these changes is difficult to predict. Properties that are currently vacant or are being marketed for redevelopment will likely be the first to turn over, with those that are stable perhaps remaining in their current state beyond the planning horizon of this document. Table X.X summarizes the expected changes within the City's targeted Mixed Use Sites and reflects the anticipated accompanying shifts in land use in each ten-year planning period. Table X.X: Land Use Changes by Ten-Year Planning Period By 202o Acres Area Acres Area Mixed Use Site B Existing Future Mixed Use Site H Existing Future Commercial 3.8 50% Vacant 28•3 -- Nigh Density Residential 0 50��o Office o 75% Nigh Density Residential 0 25��0 By 2030 Mixed Use Site D Existing Future Mixed Use Site L Existing Future Industrial » -- Low Density Residential 2.7 -- Commercial 2.2 25��o Institutional �.2 -- Office t.8 25% Office o.9 -- Nigh Density Residential 0 5o�ia Commercial 0 5o�io Nigh Density Residential 0 50��0 Mixed Use Site G Existing Future Mixed Use Site N Existing Future Commercial 4.5 -- Institutional �0.3 25°io Office �.5 50��o Nigh Density Residentia) 0 75% Open Space o.3 -- Nigh Density Residentia) 0 50��0 Mixed Use Site J Existing Future Office 6.9 -- Nigh Density Residential 0 75% Commercial 0 25��0 By za40 Mixed Use Site C Existing Future Mixed Use Site I Existing Future Industrial �4.6 -- Industrial �8.3 -- Commercial 2 50% Commercial 4•4 50% Nigh Density Residential 0 50��o Office o 50��0 Mixed Use Site F Existing Future Industrial �q.2 -- Commercial 2 l00% Zoning Zoning is the main tool available to the City for implementing the Comprehensive Plan. The requirements of each Zoning District specify the allowed uses, height, massing, and location of development on each parcel. Additional regulations provide protection to lakes and other water bodies, manage areas prone to flooding, and ensure telecommunication, solar, and wind equipment can operate without significantly impacting surrounding properties. Some uses require additional review and approval to ensure they are compatible with their neighbors. These are managed by the issuance of Conditional Use Permits. Planned Unit Developments (PUDs) provide the ability to introduce flexibility in the zoning requirements in order to meet the needs of the property owner while also generating additional benefits to the City. Any conflicts between current zoning and future land uses must be resolved through the systematic rezoning of properties to align with new land uses within nine months of adoption of the Comprehensive Plan. To view the current Zoning Map and Zoning District Descriptions see Appendix XX. Subdivision of Land Golden Valley is a fully developed community, so any new housing will likely occur through the splitting of an existing lot and/or the tear down and replacement of an older home. The City has processes in place to allow for these types of activities while at the same time striving to protect neighboring properties and homeowners from the disruptions associated with construction to the extent possible. Subdivisions allow larger (ots to be divided for the construction of additional homes. All new lots must meet specific standards related to size and shape before they can be approved. The City also examines the presence of steep slopes or wetlands and the availability of sewer and water connections. As the number of larger lots remaining in Golden Valley dwindles, the number of subdivisions possible will shrink over time. Residential development increasingly involves demolishing an existing home and building a new home in its place. While this may create disruption and inconvenience for the surrounding neighborhood, it also has the benefit of creating new and modernized structures and increasing the value of the housing stock. The City has developed a variety of oversight tools for this often challenging process, including regulating demolition, protecting existing trees, managing changes in grading and water flow, and requiring a Construction Management Agreement to ensure all rules are followed. Redevelopment Areas Golden Valley currently has five established Redevelopment Areas (see Figure X.X and Table X.X). These areas, designated by the Golden Valley Nousing and Redevelopment Authority (NRA) and adopted by the City Council, are intended for long-range planning and redevelopment. Various tools, such as Tax Increment Financing(TIF), can be used to facilitate growth and development in these areas. Figure X.X: Redevelopment Areas I � } -, - ---- -'i ; i too � ' j � j � (��_ � I � �: ,. � . , , � , � = � -?----- �� _ � Medicine Lake Rd � � I i i T�-�r't I � . . � � . � � � -� - � , i � i �'r � � , 1 - - i ' � t ' � .:. i � ,. � �, � ; � � ; ;>, ` �y u �`` ,_ �"� "� Y'' � I ; a t I i ' � � / � 169 ��j `'� � ( ��t � �� ' j � ' � _. � ,-��'°,� hiyi S� s j, � ptden Val1e Rd i ' _ . � ' 1 d � _ T�, ,, � _ > � �--�,, / .. A - .! �� ..� .,A 1 . ��'. , I � , - � A � , � � . - �� , . � � . L. � � �� _ ; _ n' �� ; " �I ;:� ;.� „ ,�" �� , . � � , , I�� fi � � , _ - � � � ��t. �- _- _ � - I ._�� ,, � ya` �i �` 1 ....,-' , t._..�-...,.s�� ,.� �r , , ; i` }� r � } ; t , � , ..r, " `--�� ' � � , 7 odO t I ; `- �^ -�----�---,,, . � x r , _ . _ _ ;: , � -�--_,.-� 1- -r � 1 �:--� ; : - __ � � �----"'� �� ; � , . �, � � -.�__ ,__ _� � �� '' ;�: ss r �� _ � _ L _ �. �- �- '� � _ _ . } 9 � >�.. � - 55 � ,N:1 i � �� m; !eJ � � �„ � � _., � . _ h��a_.� ,�� /� �� ' l �, a Pve I � _ , � � �� g E � , •y� � � , � � �+� I 1 -•--- _. A l -�", W � �� 4 G�g� I " , �� f � '�� • . � �) , r-m- 169 � k' � . � i joi _ --._.. t� � I ' �° -. , ' .bat 100 � . \ v � � , _ � r , - -_�-,_�,--._-✓ �, � ' 1m� � �� i I � ---. � . � � � � i �� «� , , X � I . . , � I �' "'-•�------------'--------._.. _.�.--- �--'---_"^" _ � . _. __. -� � � �� _ 4��z � I ',✓�- --- �� - ��' � � � � _,--^�``� i Redevelopment Areas Redevelopment Area 0 025 0.5 t Mile 1 � I i 1 Sources:I-lennepin County Surveyors Office for Property Lines(2ot7),City of Golden Valley for all other layers(20�7). Table X.X: Redevelopment Areas Rede ` :� �_Area Year Es �� North Wirth �q78 Used in the 198os and qos to help with soil clean-up to support redevelopment north of Nwy 55 �-394 Corridor(formerly Golden Hills) 1984 expanded/renamed in 20�2 Initially created to support redevelopment north of Nwy�2; expanded in 20�2 to support the objectives from the I-394 Corridor Study Douglas Drive Corridor 20�0 Created to support redevelopment along Douglas Drive in conjunction with planned road reconstruction Nighway 55 West 20�2 Created to support redevelopment north of Nwy 55, including public improvements to sidewalks and utilities Winnetka & Medicine Lake Road 20�5 Created to support redevelopment in the southeast quadrant of this intersection, including the creation of public infrastructure for flood storage Although the City has identified certain general areas for redevelopment, activity in these areas is primarily driven by market conditions. Detailed redevelopment plans are included in A�pendix XX. To exercise official powers of redevelopment authorized for local NRAs under state law, the City must make findings about any area proposed for redevelopment. Findings typically include the existence of blight or other needs for systematic reinvestment. POLICY PLAN The Policy Plan for this Chapter includes a set of long-term goals and objectives that will be fulfilled through specific actions and policy decisions. The Policy Plan is a long-range document that expresses the values of the community and establishes a vision. It provides direction and guidance for the future of the City in terms of policymaking, improvements, programs, investments, priorities, and work plans. It can be utilized for decision-making purposes by elected officials, commissions, boards, staff, and other interested members of the community. The Policy Plan is updated every�o years based on new data and community feedback as required by Minnesota law. Goal �: Create a Complete Community Strive for a diverse and balanced community that contains a variety of residential areas, major employers, retail, services, institutions, and parks and open spaces Objectives �. Provide a diverse and balanced future land use map 1.1 Support a variety of housing options, with a focus on accommodations for seniors �.2 Protect parks, open spaces, and natural areas from development �.3 Preserve places of assembly as important spaces for social interaction 1.4 Enhance employment centers 2. Encourage development that serves the daily needs of Golden Valley residents 2.� Support the downtown area at Winnetka Ave and Nwy 55 and other neighborhood commercial nodes 2.2 Provide contemporary and flexible regulations that allow for new concepts in retail and service 2.3 Identify and seek to fill perceived gaps 3. Plan for multi-modal transportation 3.� Ensure that new developments recognize all modes of transportation 3.2 Provide multi-faceted transportation options, including improved roadways, trails, and sidewalks 4. Encourage a sustainable level of job and tax-base growth 4.� Retain General Mills, Tennant, Noneywell, and other major corporations 4.2 Incorporate new mixed use zoning, when possible, into development plans Goal 2: Minimize Conflicts and Impacts of Change Develop a regulatory framework designed to minimize potential conflicts between land uses Objectives �. Protect existing residential neighborhoods �.� Provide open space buffers between residential areas and commercial or industrial areas �.2 Arrange land uses so there are compatible transitions between major land use types �.3 Enforce subdivision regulations to reduce potential impacts to neighborhood character 2. Support non-residential growth opportunities while respecting adjacent properties 2.1 Use Planning Districts as an organizing concept in discussions with property owners and developers 2.2 Utilize Conditional Use Permits to help mitigate impacts to adjacent properties 2.3 Promote Planned Unit Developments as a way to achieve zoning flexibility 2.4 Prioritize on-site expansion of corporate and industrial uses over off-site growth Goal 3: Promote High Quality Development Ensure new development meets high construction and visual quality standards and includes measures of sustainability Objectives �. Require the use of high quality, durable materials in all new developments 2. Promote visual quality standards in design and material selection of new development 2.� Integrate new development with existing architectural character 2.2 Encourage visually attractive development in high profile locations and along the city's major corridors 2.3 Require significant use of trees and vegetation in all new developments, whether through preservation or addition 3. Require use of efficient and effective site design standards for all new developments 3.1 Encourage developments to respect their surroundings 3.2 Utilize adopted mixed use principles to encourage site design that accommodates complementary uses 3•3 Recognize and support development patterns that acknowledge the character of suburban neighborhoods 4. Encourage environmentally sustainable 'green building' practices 4.� Encourage development to meet sustainability criteria, such as that suggested by Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) and the United States Department of Energy Goal 4: Prepare for Targeted Redevelopment Utilize public and private redevelopment opportunities to advance the City's Future Land Use Map and policies Objectives �. Redevelop parcels that are blighted, functionally obsolete, economically unsustainable, or incompatible with adjacent uses �.� Maintain an inventory of property conditions, tax delinquencies, and other indicators of property disinvestments throughout the City �.2 Develop a vision for vulnerable sites with small area plans and master plans �.3 Pursue grant funding opportunities and consider City financial assistance for the redevelopment of specific sites in the City �.4 Continue to monitor market and demographic trends in order to inform development strategies and decisions 2. Encourage high density, pedestrian-oriented, environmentally sustainable developments in areas of the City well served by transit 2.� Enhance community identity and character in the downtown area with redevelopment projects 2.2 Leverage light rail investment at Golden Valley Road Station with increased housing density 2.3 Prioritize redevelopment in the I-394 Mixed-Use corridor 2.4 Maintain neighborhood character while simultaneously welcoming new development to the Douglas Drive and Duluth Street corridors 3• Coordinate City approval processes across all departments in a proactive manner 3.� Conduct coordinated and simultaneous project review with staff in the inspections, planning, engineering, public works, and fire safety divisions as well as any other applicable departments, agencies, and project partners 3.2 Seek opportunities to improve the efficiency, predictability, and transparency of the redevelopment process and permit approvals process 3.3 Require pre-development meetings with property developers prior to the formal submission of permit applications Goal 5: Protect the Environment Encourage environmentally sustainable land use patterns and development practices that accommodate the City's social and economic needs Objectives �. Preserve and enhance land that supports existing trees, plants, wetlands, and other water bodies �.� Support the implementation of the city's Natural Resources Management Plan, including acquiring strategic properties to add to the open space system �.2 Enforce tree and landscape requirements �.3 Protect parks and open space areas from encroachment or destruction from neighboring properties �.4 Work with developers to provide permanent open space and park areas in development plans 2. Mitigate development threats to the city's natural resources 2.� Enforce shoreland and wetland regulations to protect water quality 2.2 Enforce outdoor lighting standards to reduce excessive light in night sky 2.3 Use Planned Unit Developments to allow for flexibility in site design when needed to preserve vegetation or other sensitive site features 3. Encourage sustainable development practices to reduce environmental impacts 3.1 Utilize innovative stormwater management techniques to improve water quality and manage volume of runoff 3.2 Support residential/commercial/office mixed use developments in order to reduce automobile travel and associated air pollution Goal 6: Support Opportunities for Multi-Modal Transportation Integrate land use and transportation planning principles in order to provide a balanced system of transportation alternatives Objectives �. Adopt land use guidance, zoning practices, and design guidelines that encourage development conducive to walking, biking, and transit use �.� Continue to create and enforce standards for building placement and site design to create a pedestrian-friendly environment �.2 Focus redevelopment efforts near high-frequency transit service and implement transit-oriented development policies in these areas 2. Integrate land use planning and transportation planning efforts in order to continue addressing community goals and values within redevelopment projects 2.� Ensure that local and regional destinations are accessible by biking and walking 2.2 Im�prove the bicycle and pedestrian environment in the downtown area to ensure it is a safe and enjoyable place to walk 2.3 Limit the establishment of large auto-oriented uses in the city 2.4 Seek opportunities to provide a variety of housing options near high-frequency transit service, along prominent routes within the bicycle network, and in pedestrian-friendly areas of the City IMPLEMENTATION PLAN The Implementation Plan for this Chapter includes a set of specific actions to accomplish the goals and objectives set forth in the Policy Plan. It differs from the Policy Plan in that it provides the opportunity to easily measure progress and note tangible outcomes from each task. Each task provides an approximate cost estimate for the work and notes a timeframe in which the specific action should take place. Tasks are prioritized based on financial feasibility, staff capacity, importance or urgency for action, and other factors. The Implementation Plan is updated every 5 years (mid-cycle of the �o year Policy Plan) based on progress and new opportunities. Create a Complete Community Implementation Actions: • Prioritize and incentivize housing for seniors. • Conduct a planning study of Golden Valley's downtown and look for ways to enhance this area through potential rezoning, modifications to regulations, and pedestrian and bicycle improvements. • Require multi-modal accommodations in all new developments so that pedestrians, bicycles, and transit users are included in the site and building design process. • Expand the applicability of the I-394 Mixed Use Zoning District to other areas of the city to create opportunities for new employment. • Research ways to improve the Institutional Zoning District to provide better opportunities for religious and social groups to find space within the city. Minimize Conflicts and Impacts of Change Implementation Actions: • Review and update use tables for each Zoning District to modernize and simplify the approval process and to recognize new types of uses. • Continue to refine and utilize Residential Construction Management Agreements for subdivisions and residential redevelopment. • Utilize Inspections staff to monitor potential problems at work sites. Frequent visits by Inspections staff may provide opportunities to head off issues before they spill over to neighboring property owners. • Evaluate effectiveness of communication efforts with properties surrounding development sites. Ensure notices are being delivered at the appropriate times and to the appropriate people. Promote Nigh Quality Development Implementation Actions: • Work with other departments to ensure material quality and durability standards are in place. • Develop standards for material use by Zoning District, focusing on multi-family buildings and all non-residential uses. Look to other cities for examples on regulations of types of materials and quantities required. • Research architectural and design standards that could be used to ensure visual quality. Update the Mixed Use zoning requirements to incorporate any necessary changes. • Continue to coordinate with other departments to review and provide feedback on development proposals in order to ensure high quality projects. • Create a green building guide to constructing efficient, sustainable buildings that includes references to local resources. Direct all building permit applicants to this resource to encourage the construction of more sustainable, energy-efficient buildings. • Explore the use of zoning incentives to encourage sustainable building practices. Prepare for Targeted Redevelopment Implementation Actions: • Conduct development review meetings on a regular basis for staff in multiple divisions of the City. • Continually assess the efficiency, predictability,and transparency of the development approval process and make adjustments as necessary. • Rezone properties and make adjustments to the Zoning Code in order to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. • Make changes to the I-394 Zoning District to better reflect market realities. • Regularly attend trainings and seminars on market conditions, innovative planning and zoning techniques, and grant funding opportunities. • Adopt small area plans and master plans for specific sites within the City in order to prepare for redevelopment. Protect the Environment Implementation Actions: • Utilize the inventory of remnant parcels to prioritize any land for natural resource enhancement or protection. • Continue to explore ways to apply development Park Dedication Fees to fund new elements of the park and trail systems. • Revisit the Planned Unit Development amenity point system to look for opportunities to give greater value to actions that provide environmental protection or enhancement. • Re-examine solar and wind sections of the Zoning Code for any necessary updates in language or policy due to advances in technology. • Add impervious surface limits to all Zoning Districts to help manage stormwater runoff. • Rezone to allow new mixed use developments across the city to support the reduction of automobile use. Support Opportunities for Multi-Modal Transportation Implementation Actions: • Pursue grant funding opportunities for projects that enhance the multi-modal transportation network. • Conduct further study of opportunities to enhance the downtown area. • Research the potential for a reduction in parking requirements for projects located near high-frequency transit service in order to offset development costs. • Research the potential for a pedestrian-oriented zoning overlay district for application near high-frequency transit service and areas where redevelopment is predicted. • Expand the applicability of the I-394 Mixed Use Zoning District to other areas of the city. • Analyze how auto-oriented uses are regulated in the Zoning Code and make adjustments to meet City and community goals. Summary of Implementation Actions Action Estimated Cost Timeframe On oin Create Complete Communit Prioritize and incentivize housing for $ 0-5 years X seniors Conduct a planning study of Golden Valley's downtown �$ 0-5 years Require multi-modal accommodations in all new develo ments � 0-5 years X Expand the applicability of the I-3q4 Mixed Use Zonin District � 0-5 years Research ways to improve the Institutional � 0-5 years Zonin District Minimize Impacts of Chan e Review and update use tables for each Zonin District � 0-5 years Continue to refine and utilize Residential Construction Mana ement A reements � 0-5 years X Utilize Inspections staff to monitor otential problems at work sites � O-5 years X Evaluate effectiveness of communication efforts � 0-5 years X Promote Hi h Qualit Develo ment Ensure material quality and durability standards are in place � 0-5 years Develop standards for material use by Zonin District � 0-5 years Research architectural and design standards to ensure visual ualit � 0-5 years Coordinate with other departments to review and provide feedback on $ 0-5 years X development ro osals Ex lore the use of zonin incentives $ 0-5 years - Create a reen buildin uide $ 5-�o years Pre are for Tar eted Develo ment Conduct development review meetings on a re ular basis � 0-5 years X Assess the efficiency, predictability, and transparency of the development approval $ O-5 years rocess Rezone properties and make adjustments to the Zonin Code � 0-5 years Make chan es to the I-394 Zonin District $ 0-5 ears Re ularly attend trainin s and seminars $$ 0-5 years X Adopt small area plans and master plans for s ecific sites �� o-�o years Protect the Environment Utilize the inventory of remnant parcels $ 0-5 years Explore ways to apply development Park Dedication Fees to fund new parks and $ 0-5 years trails Revisit the Planned Unit Development amenity point system � O-5 years Re-examine solar and wind sections of the Zonin Code � 0-5 years Add impervious surface limits to all Zoning Districts � O-5 years Rezone to allow new mixed use developments � 0-5 years Su ort Multi-Modal Trans ortation Pursue grant fundin opportunities $ O-5 years X Conduct further study of opportunities to enhance the downtown area �� 0-5 years Research the potential for a reduction in arkin requirements � O-5 years Expand the applicability of the I-394 Mixed Use Zonin District � 0-5 years Analyze how auto-oriented uses are re ulated � 0-5 years �`��''�1 ��4 � � � � `�',�, , � ��" , Ph�si�al �►eveloprnent I�epartmen� 763-593-8U951'763-59�-81 t?9{fax� . . .. . . . ..... 1 . . . .. � . . . Date: February 12, 2018 To: Golden Valley Planning Commission From: Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager Emily Goellner, Associate Planner/Grant Writer Subject: Comprehensive Plan Work Session —Transportation Chapter The fifth chapter of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan has been drafted and distributed to the City Council and the members of the Environmental, Open Space and Recreation, Human Rights, and Planning Commissions for review and comment. Please submit comments no later than 4:00 pm on Monday, February 12 by email or phone. Staff will compile all of the comments and provide a summary with initial reactions at the meeting. An informal Work Session will provide an opportunity to discuss any revisions that should be considered as the full Comp Plan is drafted. Future meetings will cover additional chapters including Water Resources, Economic Competitiveness, and a Community Profile. Attachments • DRAFT Transportation Chapter—2040 Comp Plan (35 pages) TRANSPORTATION CHAPTER DRAFT released February Z, 20�8 OUTLINE �� Introduction � Key Points � �� History Existing Conditions �� p • Roadway System � �� o Functional Classification o Traffic Volumes and Capacity Analysis o Traffic Forecast Analysis o Traffic Impact Management o Safety Analysis o Access Management o Pavement Management Program o Infrastructure Renewal Program o Right of Way Preservation and Character o Freight o Autonomous and Connected Vehicle Technologies o Complete Streets • Transit System o METRO Blue Line Extension o Nwy�6q Mobility Study o Nwy 55 BRT • Bicycle and Pedestrian Network o Local Network o Regional Network o Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan • Aviation Facilities • Sub-Area Plans Policy Plan Implementation Plan • Summary of Implementation Actions 1 INTRODUCTION The Golden Valley Comprehensive Transportation Plan is an integrated component of the Golden Valley Comprehensive Plan Update developed to provide planning guidance over the next ten years based upon needs anticipated through 2040.The transportation plan assesses all modes of transportation, including streets and highways,trails and sidewalks,transit facilities, and airport accessibility.This plan expresses the location, limits, function, and capacity of all transportation facilities in the City of Golden Valley. The plan recognizes the changing travel needs of its residents, commuters,visitors, commercial transporters, pedestrians, and cyclists making trips through the community. To provide for safe, multi-modal transportation facilities that offer adequate capacity with a high level of mobility,a transportation improvement plan that corresponds to the overall comprehensive plan must be adopted and implemented. KEY POINTS • The functionality and effectiveness of the transportation system is largely determined by the Future Land Use Plan. � Safety is of utmost importance and transportation improvements that resolve outstanding safety issues will be prioritized. • The City's Pavement Management Program will evolve into a more comprehensive Infrastructure Renewal Program in the coming years. This will shift the City's focus from reconstruction of roadways to preservation and maintenance. • Golden Valley will work to adapt streets to accommodate bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure. Complete reconstruction is the most cost effective way to complete this work, but some bicycle and pedestrian facilities can be built during pavement rehabilitation projects or as part of redevelopment. HISTORY The earliest routes through Golden Valley were muddy roads used by horses and wagons. Watertown Road (now Golden Valley Road)was often impassable in the spring. It connected Watertown in Carver County with St. Anthony and wound to avoid swamps, hills,and homes. In�qt2,the Electric Luce Line railroad was built through the village and was the only form of public transportation available,though there was no depot and waiting passengers had to flag down the train. Several other railroad lines were built around the turn of the century to accommodate freight shipments. The original date of construction of Nwy�2 is unknown, but records from�q2o show that it was widened to 2o feet. In �922, the road that eventually become Nwy 55 was constructed. Nwy�oo was graveled and graded by the county in �q32 and became known as the Belt Line, or Lilac Way due to the number of lilacs planted along it. Nwy�6q was established as major route in the�q3os. In the�94os, a planning and zoning framework established the location of commercial properties along major streets and industrial properties near railways. Residential streets were planned to accommodate hills and valleys, resulting in sweeping curves.The community developed rapidly in the�q5os, bos,and �970s. Construction began in 1987 to upgrade Nwy 12 to I-394, Nwy too was upgraded to a freeway system,and improvements were made to Nwy�69 and Nwy 55.The City began reconstructing local streets in the�99os as they reached the end of their life span. Personal automobiles have been the predominant mode of transportation for most of Golden Valley's history. Most Golden Valley residents drive alone to work and that has not changed in 25 years or more.This is typical for suburban communities with robust roadway networks, but has the (ikelihood of decreasing between today and 204o for several reasons. 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS Roadway System Functional C►assification Functional classification is the process by which streets and highways are grouped into classes, or systems, according to the character of service they are intended to provide.A basic premise in examining a community's functiona) classification system is that individual streets and highways do not function independently: most travel involves movement through a network of roadways. It becomes necessary to determine how this travel demand can be served by a hierarchy of roadways within the transportation network in a logical and efficient manner. Functional classification defines the nature of this hierarchy by defining the role that any particular street or highway plays in serving the flow of trips through the transportation network.There are four functional classifications of streets and highways in Golden Valley: Principal Arterials, Minor Arterials, Collectors, and Local Streets.They are listed below in descending hierarchy and illustrated in Figure 4.�- Proposed Functiona) Classification Map. Principal Arterials Urban principal arterial roadways carry the highest traffic volumes and serve the majority of trips entering or leaving Golden Valley. Principal arterials typically connect regional business districts, employment centers, and residential districts.They also are high-speed facilities(posted speed limits up to bo mph)that serve primary bus transit routes and typically have controlled or restricted access.Golden Valley has approximately�4.5 miles of principal arterial roadways,which include I-394, Nwy�6q, Nwy�oo and Nwy 55• While principal arterials are crucial assets to the capacity and mobility of the transportation system, they can create significant connectivity barriers for the bicycle and pedestrian network. Minor Arterials (Relievers and Augmenters) Minor arteria) roadways accommodate trips of moderate length at a somewhat lower level of travel mobility than principal arterials. Minor arterials typically carry lower traffic volumes and place more emphasis on land access than principal arterials.These roadways are suitable for bus transit routes, but ideally do not penetrate local neighborhoods. Posted speed limits are typically around 3o to 5o mph.The Metropolitan Council has further refined minor arterial roadways with a series of additional classifications that define the purpose and function of the minor arterials. "A" minor arterials are classified as relievers, augmenters, expanders,and connectors. Golden Valley has approximately��.4 miles minor arterials. It includes relievers such as Winnetka Avenue, Glenwood Avenue, Douglas Drive,Xenia Avenue, and General Mills Boulevard. It also includes augmenters such as Duluth Street and part of Golden Valley Road. Collectors Collector roadways provide a balance between land access and mobility that moves local street traffic to and from the arterial roadway system.Collectors can support retail or other commercial establishments and may carry relatively high traffic volumes. Golden Valley has approximately��.7 miles of collector streets, including Laurel Avenue, Plymouth Avenue, Country Club Drive, Theodore Wirth Parkway, Noble Avenue, Zane Avenue, parts of Golden Valley Road, and several others.The Metropolitan Council's functional classification system includes major collector and minor collector definitions, however minor collectors are not recognized as regional facilities within urbanized cities such as Golden Valley. It is proposed that only one collector classification be used in Golden Valley and that all collectors be equivalent to major collectors as defined by Metropolitan Council. Local Streets All other public and private streets within Golden Valley are classified as local streets. Local streets provide the highest level of direct access and therefore carry the lowest traffic volumes typically at the lowest speeds.Golden Valley has approximately qo miles of local streets. These streets typically provide private property access in low density residential areas. 3 Figure 4.�: Functional Classification System i � ' ' , , ---- ____.� , i � , ; _ _. ., , � -r ��! � ' i �oo I � i � � � _.-� � � � � � � t � .' �_ � � r �� I ��-. _,., Medicine Lake Rd I � I , . � ,r._..�_ , i � � .. �. _ • ,,, .. . L�. � . : � � , � - . � ;�� , . � � � I . �'� ��^� u _ t�� '. �z � ' " � � r �� t� �.� . ) � �!(�� - ' � � ` ( 1 (_ ,• �- �'� � ��z�� .-� • f � ` . � � " � �,/�� . � � � �: 169 , �, - rr� �� 4 � ` I � - • - -- —� � puI�� St � f'�"� �' olden Valay Rd � ` �� . ;� , �� -�_� � � __ ��'�` � r`"� � 1 � � w I � � . � � � , ,� , a t._ � ._ — _ ` ' �y �`�.. } � ' , , � L i � 1�� r , i � _�� % � �� 7 � � � f �� g ° � Y , � � � � � � . , �i � -- � �,�"�` . .., ' � . : y �_ ,?� °' 1 � � , `� ! m ( = ;' �r j � � , , �� o � i , �� „ E � � ` e +�-�-� �� '- ( � ., � �d�� t� � I e I� „�h R m �C ...,-+dC_ y.,' . _. `'"e F- ,r�.-. . i �` " .� j �'` ! U i 4� . ; - ,� } �� ,�� ; I �_� , � � ... , ' ss ' _ �� _. � i �� k, - � _ �_ ss -- .,_ ` 'i U � � �, , ---__ ,_ , � , - II ` � ,,, p �' � _ � '�� " _L_ ' ' ` i j � �, m ,'�'x ,� t �/Q N�oo i ,,,�.\.� � � � t� ��' o pve I .��, � � � � I ."9ry; i �.j � + � o I q + ` t � n•ro � ....�. � ; t.' `-t r � '� t - � "� � G�e � ,. 169 � ;Q /�� i . t ' - '- ------ z , ' � � , , r � l � . � � x (.. , . � �, v�, � �' �, , � ��:�.k � �_ � �__ �ao � , , , A . �� , ; �� ._�_ x , - �--- _ �� . � , ,�� ! _ . , ; � � d .� , , � � i , � , , ,� � � �� . �. i � -------------------- _ , l _ i , , ' /` ` tT,� , � i' i L ''�: � ., � .... ..� �� i :� � ,. .. ..� :. u ... ... /� �.. . . _ �.��`��.�. �� '��rY- � .Y-r"k�J ..��5' :... Legend Functional Classification A-Minor Augmenter- B-Minor Arterial Supplement to the Principal � "�V�ry Classification no longer used Principal Arterial- Arterial system in densely -�- Regional freeways and developed areas �OCd� expressways Access within commercial and Collector- residential neighborhoods A-Minor Reliever- Connect major traffic Relieves congestion on parallel generators,job centers Principal Arterials and neighborhoods 0 0.25 0.5 1 Mile I i I i I Sources: Hennepin County Sunreyors Office for Property Lines(2017), City of Golden Valley for all other layers(2017). 4 Traffic Volumes& Capacity Analysis The capacity of a roadway is a measure of its ability to accommodate a certain volume of moving vehicles.The factors affecting capacity include traffic volumes, roadway geometric conditions(such as the number of lanes and traffic controls),and vehicle characteristics. Table 4.�summarizes the capacity for different roadway types based on the Nighway Capacity Manual and the regional travel demand forecast model.The degree of congestion is measured in terms of Level of Service(LOS). LOS can range from A(free flow, no delay)to F(excessive congestion and delay). Table 4.� illustrates the level of service categories and the approximate volume-to-capacity(V/C) ratio for each facility type.A planning-level congestion analysis was performed for the existing roadways based on the daily traffic demand and roadway capacity. Figure 4.2 illustrates the most current traffic volumes and capacity documented for the roadways within the City. - - � _ - • Facility Type Number LOS LOS LOS LOS LOS Ca acit of Lanes B C D E F p y $ 95,600 110,000 725,000 140,000 754,000 147.000 Metered (nterstate 6 7i,5oo 82,500 93,500 l05,000 lib,000 iio,000 Freeway 4 47,500 54,800 62,�00 69,400 76,700 73,000 Un-metered Interstate 6 64,400 74,300 84,200 94,100 l04,000 99,000 Freeway 4 42,900 49,500 56,700 62,700 69,300 66,000 6 40,300 46,500 52,700 58,900 65,�00 62,000 Expressway 4 26,700 30,800 34,900 39,000 43,�00 47,000 6 37,200 36,000 40,800 45,600 50,400 48,000 Divided Arterial 4 20,800 24,000 27,200 30,400 33,600 32,000 2 l0,400 12,000 �3,600 �5,200 �6,800 �6,000 6 27,300 37,500 35,700 39,900 44,�00 42,000 Un-divided Arterial 4 i8,2oo Zi,000 23,800 26,600 �q,400 �8,000 2 9,700 10,50o n,9oo 73,30o i4,7oo i4,000 4 72,400 74,300 76,200 �8,�00 20,000 �9,000 Collector 2 5,900 6,800 7,700 8,60o q,5oo q,000 V/C Ratio 0.65 0.75 0.85 0.95 1.05 Estimated based on freeway daily capacity in 1-ICM and hourly capacity in the Metro Counci!Activity Based Model(ABM). City of Golden Valley is designated as developed area type in the Metropolitan Council's System Capacity issues are evident on the freeway and expressway system that pass through Golden Valley. Nwy�6q is severely congested and the effects of regional traffic demand growth are evident at the intersecting arterial corridors of I-394 and Nwy 55• Long-term congestion on the freeway system causes motorists to look for alternative routes using the City's minor arterial and collector roadway system. Daily morning peak period (also called rush hour)capacity issues are evident at (ocations such as eastbound Nwy 55 at Boone Avenue, Winnetka Avenue, and Douglas Drive 5 Figure 4.2: Existing Roadway Daily Traffic and Congestion Levels ; � ! . , , � ; . , �- ------�.- _.� , i �., . . s,ssa ! ; i I �f. --� � � ..�\ � : i , , � � � �� I � , �� .r � � #`� � r� i � � � � � ��' , , � , ,, � I I _�. � � ------�---Med�cine Lake Rd � � g�pp� L�` - � 13,100�. �.� .�y� - - � . 10 700 � � 1,700 --�1.-'------ � , , �_ - � ?' y � , . , t-- � _ , , . y y^� _.�„ � i � l 3�4� 11,500 � � � � � a-0 f`I\ � � f ' .. .. _ � � � t ,. � ri. . ' rr > ' + t� /'{ J �- ( � �� '�. t 3,150 ' � . � � � , , r,� V � ; � ' � { �i 1 ._ r'\ � � , I � ' , � a �� i ; ��3�. d ' � :-.� t u/,... Id n Val� 3,950 � . . i � '�, � 15,100'1 �� '�. � � � __ t �, ,_. ' � 9,400 � _.�� __ 1 1 11,200 , � �17,500 1 "� � � �,A I i . � ;-, : � t�{ _ f - 3,200 �- 86000 _ ; l � {= 1,650 f 11,100 � .,i_ 3,950t I � 5,700'� � 3,250 � . . . � �D � ,,�2,100 ,� S�� i i 6100�x 3,350' ' ��.�� 1 200 , dpr 2,100 2,900 13,200 �fi'i ;€,x 1 2,3� � i 180�; „-.- �, �� " i � - �,100,000 �,�� 3.450 � 88000 6,700 �� 7,300�6,100 1050 �_.._, �' Y� , �.". 3 400 5,500�✓5,300 8,400 � ; r�a ' � ' 2,200��1.600� . 12,150 � ,'�� ,a p iA� �� 38,000 �'"^�„�.15,600 7000 � � ` � `, �.� 33,000 <<�_ af� � � ''�^^^..��._,.r `:�-;: �„�. .-.` r � �, t 7rw 27,500 � 24,� I , a � � 37,500 1 r . r� �,'�� _ G�e��,�� _ i 1�900 �'' �� ; x _ v.e I S,Q00 - 9,400 ` , r �_ a -------L �'iv i � �l 105,000 3,450�.N 4,300 � 8A00 , , : 4,350 , 9 700� ' 100,000 � ; �" 1,600 � � � < �8,700 � �, . 8,700 ------ > / �,� __�:,,:�!__ 3,900��5,400�'S,200�4,650�"��4,J00 7,00 � 105,000 � ;�_)' � :- � 4,600� � � � �. � � l, � , '� � . ' S,9� 6 200�122,�O�Q �� 18 400 ` l�5,600 14 500 �� t -------_..._..__.--7,400----�--=---�- � ' I , � > ----�. ----,....-_ �-� t42,000 „: � i'-'- 129.000l�� r,,. � �� '�:� :__j i j t33 000 ! ! �4 � . � + t � . �� .. j� . �.,-�^"t , , :.�,:�^. , _.- " � .�x,n�'1 ��,xsr t . Level of Service tJOTE Daily capacities for roadways are es6maled based on the number of lanes and funchonal class in � LOS A or B the origmal Regional Nlodel LOS C � LOS D � LOS E �� LOS F X,XXX Existing AADT 0 0.25 0.5 1 Mile L i 1 � I Sources: Hennepin County SuNeyors Office for Property Lines(2017}, City of Golden Valley for all other layers(2017). 6 Figure 4.3: Projected 204o Daily Traffic and Congestion Levels i i � _ r� � , _� ! l __ Lz. 2,700 ; _, ) ! . , f ; � �� ' � i � � �'-� � ��'� �� l - Medicine Lake Rd � �� I ` � I 13�300 11,700�$000 1--r--- 97,900 � � , J� , �. ' . , '. � . , �� _�� ,.. , Y7 " , i - , ; , _, , � . 3,soo �� »,soo �� t , � ; � � ' i � 3,300 �' � � - � ;' �-=s,uoo _ ( �-�.�J i� � �� ' - � �` , �� f � � ,,,-�; � � ,'�' � , � � , � ��t� Qui, , , � n Val g �3'4� � � � ' � i 1--'7'�_.� 15,700 iF14� ', ,.,; d 9100 ! -i-- j � 17,200, 17,200 ' ,; - � 11,000 ' � '�- , ; � �- ' �� - ��`, 3J00: l.� \ r t, __, � ' �,� � ? � � � ','°° . , . ,o,eoo� 1 ' ' :- - _�-� � � 3,°°°t, � 3 � �--L-�-_' � ; , i ..,��,�oo� � -- �` � �' �` y,� j i t �"'`�.,,,_ 6,400� � 3,300 � �� 6,600 ; � ri � 3'600' � ' � �...� . ;v doc 1 7 j� � � ' ,�....,.. 3,ppp 12,700 � 1,200 � � DU� { ' �. �� ' �;�� 107,000 i !j.' r � ,, 3,400 ` � }i � 1,400 -..-. � �^�; 1 8,300 , ,/6,2� . � � 92,100 4,000 � 7,400 ry -•�- � a 5,100 8,000 � �° � � 1\, 41,I00 � � � �- - �i `� � �,,� ; 4L .- �� 15,700,7,100 ' 1 �_ _. �_ 35,200 � �, 28,100 15,000 �, � n1��iIr40,50D i r� ` �" �, � � � �i r ��4,�� ' , �,. � ,� � ,. `,. � ,` � � i ... , ` °> . � ' ��Q � ��oo �,� ' � �^ � �!P - r' ' ' 3,400 a ve I �,P+�5,200� �9�200 ' 'q � �,� � 112,000 i � �-'-" - ._ �'io l � i ��,N4400 ( 8'400 ` �� 1,fi0Q � 4,500� ��i � 10900 ��8,800 � -------' � , , " � � 9,600 � ' x _ � I � 1 tt2.000 � -�,° I �n �'� 4,6003'�00�`�4,700 5,300 4,600 � � B�� ' � ' �---�108 OOD � � �� ' . - ��y`133,000' � �5,800 ' 6,300 � 5.900 ' �.._: ._? -18,200 " ,, 15,3pp � ' "--�---- -7,400 �`�.- --- � � � �� :�.� I_� �y--- 152,000 ''' � � �� "� �135,000`-"r'� ��' � �; � , j , �� :/ �e�,. . . . �r} �..'"-�"�.'�.r^� (. F _ _ Level of Service NOTE Daily capadties(or roadways are esGmated based on the number of lanes and fwciional class in � LOS A of B the onginal Regional Model LOS C � - LOS D �� LOS E � I.OS F X,XXX 2040 AADT 0 0.25 0.5 1 Mile 1 i I � 1 Sources: Hennepin County Surveyors Office for Property Lines(2017), City of Golden Valley for all other layers(2017). 7 where traffic demand results in delay for all users. Collector routes are subjected to overflow traffic demands during the peak periods.An example of this is Medicine Lake Road and Mendelssohn Avenue,which serve as an alternative to Nwy�6g during congested periods. Another example of this is at Wayzata Boulevard between Nwy�oo and Theodore Wirth Parkway,which is used as an alternative to I-3q4.These are intended to serve a combination of local and longer trips but freeway congestion periodically causes an undue level of regional trips being served on the local system.Added demand on the local roadway system results in issues related to access management, intersection control,street continuity and connectivity,and neighborhood livability. Traffic Forecast Analysis The City has conducted an analysis of future travel conditions based on population growth and anticipated development patterns using the Metropolitan Council's travel demand model from the 204o Transportation Policy Plan (TPP).The travel demand model allocates population and employment data to individual geographic Transportation Analysis Zones (TAZs) based on the 204o Future Land Use Plan.The detailed results of this analysis are found in the appendix of this Chapter. Based on this analysis, Figure 4•3 shows the projected levels of daily traffic and congestions in the year 2040.The following findings were compiled as a result of the forecasting exercise based upon comparison of 20�5 and 204o Metropolitan Council travel demand models: • Today, there are approximately 235,00o vehicle trips that originate or terminate within Golden Valley on an average day • Trips that begin or end in Golden Valley are expected to increase by approximately 8 percent by 2040 • For trips served by all roads in Golden Valley, approximately 37 percent originate or terminate in the City and 63 percent pass through Golden Valley without stopping • Regional routes through Golden Valley will experience greater travel demand increases than local routes. � During peak periods, if the regional routes cannot serve the demand volumes,excess demand will spillover onto the local roadways • Since capacity issues will continue to be a challenge on principal arterials,the City will continue to pursue and support regional transit projects and travel demand management strategies for these corridors � The Future Land Use Plan accommodates development densities around transit that is consistent with the Metropolitan Council's Transportation Policy Plan (204o TPP) • No further adjustments to the Future Land Use Plan are necessary in order to maintain adequate capacity of the roadway system; however,the review process for individual developments will continue to be necessary in order to address site-specific impacts to traffic safety,accessibility,and capacity Traffic Impact Management&Mobility Golden Valley will continue to support and promote regional roadway capacity improvements on congested principal arterial corridors that impact traffic flow on parallel minor arterial and collector routes. Nwy�b9 demonstrates the highest level of need for improvement due to the closely spaced interchanges at I-394, Betty Crocker Drive, and Nwy 55. Congestion in this corridor results in driver delay and higher crash rates.The Metropolitan Council, MnDOT, and Scott County are engaged in a mobility study for Nwy�b9 from Shakopee to Minneapolis.This study has identified improvement concepts that add MnPASS and Bus Rapid Transit(BRT)facilities in the corridor but also provide concepts to potentially improve the interchange spacing issue on Nwy 769 in Golden Valley. Correction of the interchange spacing issues may have impacts on accessibility to adjacent land uses such as General Mills in the northeast quadrant of I-394 and Nwy tb9. Golden Valley will continue to support intersection capacity and safety improvement projects on arterial and collector routes in the City such as along Nwy 55 at Boone Avenue, Winnetka Avenue,and Douglas Drive.These projects are typically administered through a cooperative agreement with MnDOT and/or Nennepin County and they can be locally led. Mobility issues in Golden Valley relate to the balance that must occur to preserve the character of the community's established neighborhoods with new investments and redevelopment projects in the community.Opportunities for new commercial and residentia) development present increasing demands on the existing transportation system and need to be carefully monitored to assess impacts and the need for potential mitigation. Proposed development within 8 the City is reviewed to identify potential traffic impacts that may occur.Site access locations are examined for safety and capacity issues. Development proposals that may cause significant traffic impacts are required to submit a traffic impact analysis. If the City determines that the traffic impact on the surrounding transportation network will be significant, the City may request that the applicant include specific improvements with the development. In addition, local trips in the community should be accommodated on an efficient system of minor arterial and collector streets to reduce the number of local trips adding to congestion on the freeway system. Providing attractive transit facilities and services where they are needed most should be a priority. Enhancing the pedestrian and bicycle network will also improve mobility in the community. Safety Analysis Safety issues are also noted primarily on the freeway and expressway routes that pass through Golden Valley. Substandard interchange ramp design and spacing on Nwy�69 at Betty Crocker Drive,for example, leads to vehicle weaving issues and congestion and crashes on the highway. In addition,there are several examples of roadway design issues, particularly at intersections along Nwy 55 and minor arterials where delay and congestion issues contribute to the frequency of crashes. Figure ._ � 4.4-Safety Analysis Map presents the locations and frequencies of crashes � ` �`�"�---=� throughout the City.Crash rates for each intersection that experienced ,� � ' five or more crashes were calculated.The crash rate is a value that y "' "�� represents the number of crashes that have occurred for every million � `rj a �. _ , y ,�_, __..._.� '� =� _� s entering vehicles. The crash rate can then be compared to the statewide �'� .�,��s average rate for intersections that operate with the same type of traffic - >�` k�� '�" ;' control.The critical crash rate is a statistical value that is unique to each ` intersection and is based on vehicular exposure and the statewide average =�`° -...,;� � r � �� F�-_ crash rate for similar intersections.An intersection with a crash rate above q mix of freeway ramp traffic and local the critical rates indicates a sustained crash problem at the intersection. shopping center traffic results in safety The intersections in crash map are color coded to indicate whether the concerns along Duluth Street near Nwy average crash rate is exceeded or whether the critical rate has been �oo for both motorized and non- exceeded. motorized traffic. Intersections that have crash rates higher than their critical rates or the average rate for that type of intersection should be reviewed to determine causal factors contributing to the crash experience. Intersections that have had crashes involving pedestrians or bicycles should also be reviewed for opportunities to improve conditions that may have contributed to the non-motorized crash. Problem locations will be monitored and further evaluated as deemed appropriate by City staff. Intersection geometric changes and/or traffic control changes can often be identified to reduce the frequency of,or possibly the severity of crashes that will occur in the future. Opportunities to improve intersection safety are routinely reviewed as part of larger corridor construction or reconstruction projects. As shown in Figure 4.4,there following four intersections have historical crash rates that exceed their critical rates: Medicine Lake Road and Douglas Drive Safety improvements at this intersection were recently made with the Douglas Drive reconstruction project. Prior to reconstruction the eastbound to southbound right turn movement was served by a"free right"turn lane.The old geometry put the right turning driver in a disadvantaged position to look for gaps in the southbound traffic stream. Drivers would often choose inadequate gaps, then suddenly stop, making them vulnerable to rear end collisions by following vehicles.The 20�6 reconstruction project corrected this issue by eliminating the free right turn lane. Crash frequency should be monitored to deterrnine of any additional treatment is warranted. Golden Valley Road and Theodore Wirth Parkwav The intersection operates as a multi-lane, all-way stop controlled intersection with channelized "free right"turn lanes. The multi-lane all-way stop operation creates uncertainty for drivers regarding the sequence arrivals from multiple 9 Figure 4.4: Safety Analysis Map �� i �� ------ _;�-.� _ ' ..� �, ' 1, , ,00 ;, I�� j `_ t; I '; , � � � l� ' �� t � �� I � ic' e d � ��{? �� t �3 � a �s � "?—��JC: ae—ti�-'�'---- ' 1 j I n � � i, � ��. +---- �> r .� �� - � r C; L { �',�.} � .U`/ O � U '`�C� �� ` � b �. \ � • ` � � , _ _ , � � . i � � �' ' � (� a^1 � 1 V � �e �' . . . c -- , . 22 n, S� 1 °: . - . . � � ' . , � '', CJ �. i ' .. . . � . 12, � ' � I r_ ' ..' , ��., /�� I t /��,��.�., '. y� i �/�I�I 11 i� ! I �. ,� ■p1:Ai .� S /� �, i �Y �-, \/�i�/ , ( �.J � i I & �: o � . _) �. . �"u"s. .i i.,. I _._. �a.. � \,) � . '�. �. , r �,� ..� �� ' . . � } _ � � it � p � _ . , � � i �" - �� j b � �� -� �' � � � � . �-_ cXz_ o� � -� c> s � �,- '� � ��: � � � ,- � _. � i _ Q , -.—:-<.: , � , �,n r ��,� ; �,�j d�t , � � i t�.� � � , � � _ � . ---�-'r� � s - � � C.,o -`_C r� ---•--•--{�:--,- ._�_ _� �� `� � t,�. � �� , - --�'»-�-�—.__ Ci � � G� Y ._" � ,, ' � �� '9'� G_ 5� � 1 � � ' «`_aa _ + _LI'F/ , t :� . . , 'CR.I u a ��,l - �s � �T`C - � � iy �'w� ti; �� 'O � � ..�7' ��3 T � - .' � r�� d�7 ��/ = 0�� , , S_) . . . � � � l � �� ° �� 1 �� C) �� C)�-' � �.�'Pve� $r-; �r, % � � � ' fi y ° % � � � �� , '.�"�"..� �6-' .. 1� . � � : , i / � � � � Y � dx � l�7 \`�� 7 �' �g ' °' 7 . _. S�j`S,i--�-r ;, , . � , . "_"�"�' 1 9 � ` lQ{ � t$t_`, i J., � � � �� ,r r—r''r' � , . '. c� � r `'� ,._<�-,--.-,� ! � p� � I � � � v r �. � . � � _ � O �� a��, � - � ,s � �'��> � � I �?',` s`'' '6i u C' �°=,�,8� '-' I , , . ' r� � . , , � „ . , � , :. � � ... :� �� , ..,--------------'------ - - ---'--__.. -- , , , . . , .-1 � �l .. �� i1 �` I �+ 1 . , � -----------------I � � ��`� 1 �—,�' i Crash �ocation ,±� Bicycle Crash 5 or more creshes �i {25 City-wide Crashes � Below Average Crash Rate' Number of Occurrences 2011 _2015� Below Critical Crasn Rate'• 5 or more crashes <i 1 -2 Crashes Pedestrian Crash � '� Above Average Crash Rate' � 3-4 Crashes � (16 City-wide Crashes "�` Below Critical Crash Rate" 2011 -2015) 5 or more crashes � Crashes on US 169,I 394,MN 100 - Above Average Crash Rate' Above Critical Crash Rate" •Average crash role Wr Wersedrons of simdar traffic conirW "Crdical crash rale ndc�es a sitstaNial safcry issue 0 0.25 0.5 1 Mile I � 1 � I Sources: Hennepin County Surveyors Office for Property Lines(2017), City of Golden Valley for all other layers(2017). 10 approaches and multiple lanes. Conflicts and crashes occur due to driver uncertainty of who should turn next. Pedestrians and bicyclists frequently use the intersection.At least one crash at the intersection involved a bicycle.The METRO Blue Line Extension will reconstruct the intersection to operate under signalized control with revised lane geometry.The conflicts that currently occur will be resolved.Traffic signals will create other types of driver conflicts, such as rear-end collisions.Therefore, after construction of a traffic signal is complete, intersection safety should be periodically monitored to determine its effectiveness and if any additional corrective measures are prudent to serve motorized and non-motorized users. Theodore Wirth Parkway and Glenwood Avenue This intersection operates under as an all-way stop and it serves motorized and non-motorized recreational traffic along the parkway. Glenwood Avenue is also a commuting route to and from downtown Minneapolis.The mix of user types may contribute to unexpected intersection conflicts. Glenwood Avenue is a County Road and Theodore Wirth Parkway is managed by the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board.A thorough review of operating conditions and user behavior should be performed to determine causal factors and identify potentia) safety treatments. Decatur Avenue and 7th Avenue The intersection of 7th Avenue and Decatur Avenue forms a"T" intersection.There is a stop sign for drivers on 7th Avenue and Decatur Avenue operates without traffic control.A thorough review of operating conditions and user behavior should be performed to determine causal factors and identify potential safety or traffic control treatments. Access Management Key transportation corridors are important to the overall flow and ease of travel within and through Golden Valley. Principal arterials, minor arterials, and collector streets function best with proper access spacing.Golden Valley will continue to observe the access management guidelines for access spacing that MnDOT has established.Table 4.2 illustrates applicable MnDOT access spacing guidelines adopted for use in Golden Valley. Minor arterial roadways in the community observe more permissive access and traffic signal standards than principal arterial roadways. One- quarter mile access and signal spacing is considered to be acceptable. Collector roadways are desirably served by access spacing at one-eighth mile and traffic signal spacing at one-quarter mile.Access management along Principal Arterial corridors is essential in maintaining the ease of flow and speed continuity along the roadways. Ramp metering . _ _ _ Intersection Spacing MnDOT Access Functional Category and Primary Full Conditional Signal Example Corridors in Classification Subcategory Movement Secondary Spacing Golden Valley Intersection Intersection Principal Arterials Category:4 7/2 mile �/4 mile t/2 mile Nwy 55 (Expressways) Subcategory: B Principal Arterials Category:4 �-394, Nwy 769, Nwy � Mile Interchange N/A (Freeways) Subcategory: B �oo, Category:5 Douglas Drive, Minor Arterials Subcategory: B �/4 mile �/8 mile �/4 mile Winnetka Avenue North Collectors Category: 6 �/8 mile Not Applicable t/4 mile Golden Valley Road, Subcategory: B Noble Avenue 11 is used along I-394, Nwy�6q,and Hwy�oo to manage traffic entering the highways.Access points along these corridors have been consolidated over time and all points of access are controlled and allowed only at interchanges.Access points along Nwy 55 include the use of traffic signals at all full access points and partial access at other intersections. Corridors in Golden Valley that need additional access management considerations include Nwy�69, Hwy 55, Douglas Drive,Winnetka Avenue,Golden Valley Road, and Noble Avenue. These corridors were fully developed prior to the adoption of access management standards and most of the accessibility issues have been addressed with minor improvements over time. Major improvements,such as Nwy�bq's inadequate interchange access spacing between Nwy 55, Betty Crocker Drive, and I-3q4,and other intersections which present safety and congestion problems related to excessive access, remain as unmet needs. When opportunities for redevelopment in Golden Valley's commercial districts occur, driveway entrances to commercial and industrial properties are carefully monitored, realigned,and reduced when possible in order to better manage property access.Considerations include driveway spacing,truck and delivery traffic needs,trip generation, and peak hour turning movement characteristics. In addition,as sidewalks and trails are retrofitted on minor arterial and collector corridors,accessibility concerns for pedestrians and bicyclists are considered. Pavemenf Management and Infrastrucfure Renewal Programs The Golden Valley Pavement Management Program (PMP) is an on-going systematic program for local roadway improvements to provide a safe,efficient, high quality transportation system in a long-term cost effective manner. Funding for the pavement management program integrates City resources,special assessments,and Municipal State Aid (MSA)funding.As part of the program,the City evaluates the sanitary sewer,water,and stormwater systems under each street. The highest priority repairs or replacements are done as part of the project so that multiple project improvement types can be coordinated if needed. In addition, the City considers integrating intersection safety improvements, sidewalk � and trail improvements, �' water quality `•,v � s�_ improvements,or other projects into the road reconstruction project. - .„�. _ _,.- :, The program begin in �� ' ��-_ .�. � ` �995.Since then,705 � J ,:. $ .. . . � miles of roadway have �'� � been reconstructed to � '�-y� = .��, , � � � ��,,. current standards. ��'��N � �'��+ �W�� Typical local streets before and after PMP improvements Street pavement deterioration is caused by many factors, including the freeze/thaw cycle,traffic volume and loading,the effects of moisture, and the quality of the soils beneath the street.As pavement deteriorates, certain types of distresses occur (potholes,settling, rutting,and cracking).These distresses indicate what type of maintenance or rehabilitation is needed to prolong the lifespan of a street in a cost-effective manner.The life span of the investments made during the PMP program will last through 204o with proactive and continual maintenance; however, increasing precipitation and freeze/thaw cycles may impact the resilience of the investment over time. Golden Valley is in the process of implementing a plan for long-term revenue for the long term maintenance costs.This is further addressed in the City's Resilience and Sustainability Plan. When the PMP transitions into an Infrastructure Renewal Program (IRP) in 2022, the City will shift its focus to the preservation of its roadways and will increase its investment aging underground utilities and other related public assets.The IRP will be a continuous process of maintaining and rehabilitating the City's infrastructure. 12 Righf-of Way Preservation and Character The Transportation system is comprised of�,484 acres of right-of-way,which is approximately 22 percent of the total land in the city.The majority of this right-of-way is owned by the City, but right-of-way is also owned by MnDOT, Nennepin County, and railroad companies. Right-of-way preservation is the coordinated control or protection of the right-of-way for a planned future transportation improvement. Right-of-way preservation is often times addressed in the context of corridor management, which coordinates land use planning and long-term visioning in important transportation corridors. Preservation Benefits and Strategies Right-of-way preservation provides numerous benefits to communities,taxpayers,and the public. It promotes orderly and predictable development, minimizes damage to existing homes and businesses, reduces the costs of acquiring right-of-way, and decreases adverse social, economic,and environmental impacts on people and communities. There are many different techniques and strategies available to protect right-of-way for future transportation corridors.The basic approaches are: • Land Acquisition(purchase of easements,title purchase, eminent domain) • Landowner Agreements(development agreements,transferable development rights) • Land Use Regulations (development exactions,setback ordinances, official mapping,subdivision regulations) • Access Management(limiting curb cuts, reverse lot frontage) The applicability of these approaches is dependent on many factors including available funding,the immediacy of development, and the timing of the need for the road improvements. Character Since right-of-way comprises such a significant amount of land in the city and it is highly visible to the public,there is a recognition that the character of the right-of-way is part of the entire community's character.Character is defined by the way that a corridor looks and feels as well as the presence of special amenities. Examples of amenities include public art, informational displays,and benches.The visual character of a corridor can be a reflection of the community's values. For example,the Douglas Drive reconstruction included green infrastructure, extensive landscaping, undergrounding of overhead utilities, ADA accessibility improvements, signage for Bassett Creek, sidewalks with benches, on-street bicycle lanes,and a multi-use trail. These improvements are a reflection of the values within the community,which include sustainability,active living, and inclusivity of all populations.The City will continue to integrate community values and character into the transportation system. Freight A safe, efficient, high-capacity freight transportation system is essential to the economic prosperity of Golden Valley. There are several industrial areas of the city that must accommodate truck traffic to move goods. Stores and restaurants must also be served by trucks. Manufacturing and warehouse facilities are generally located near the principal arterial and minor arterial roadway network with site accessibility from collector roadways. Some of the larger manufacturing operations that generate significant truck traffic include: • Tennant Company on Lilac Drive north of Nwy 55 has access to Nwy 55 via Zane Ave,the Nwy 55 Frontage Road,and Douglas Drive • Noneywell on Douglas Drive has access to Nwy�oo via Duluth Street • Lubrication Technologies, Inc on Mendelsohn has access to Nwy�69 via the Plymouth Ave interchange • General Mills James Ford Bell Tech Center on Plymouth Ave with access to Nwy�69 at the Plymouth Ave interchange • Liberty Carton on Louisiana Ave has access to I-394 via the Louisiana Ave interchange 13 There are also several areas of the city with a concentration of industrial uses that generate truck traffic: �:, • North Wirth Business Park ` � � • Nevada Ave and Sandburg Road area with access to Nwy � � e ��, ,�__ ,� ' `- �69 via Medicine Lake Road �-� �� . • Nwy 55 and Douglas Drive • ---' � • Zane Ave and Lindsey St area � � ` � - o� • �oth Ave and Boone Ave area ..:�� ,u., �. � ` �3,� .�y�. o,>4*�` _ '�` ^�',"� %�'4'*�;=, The other primary type of gonds movement within the city has to � �~.� �� "". �„ A;� �� i iAA�i��M��^A ��., do with deliver of roducts to retail outlets within the Cit .The ' `� � � � 'iz` '� �'�� ` �� ° ��' ' Y P Y z�:� ��„ �,.�� Primar retail areas have sufficient access to the interstate s stem ^`� '�'"Y � Y Y .., ...,T�_ F.,.d� � ��.� �'� , ._r�"; for goods delivery.The primary retail areas include: Truck mobility and access is critical to successful commerce within the City • Golden Valley Shopping Center: access to Nwy 55 via � Winnetka Ave • Golden Valley Commons:access to Nwy 55 via Winnetka Ave and Rhode Island Ave • Golden Valley Town Square: access to Nwy 55 via Winnetka Ave and Rhode Island Ave • Spring Gate Shopping Center:access to Nwy�oo via Duluth Street and Lilac Drive North • I-394 commercial area between Winnetka Ave and Xenia Ave:access to I-394 via Xenia Ave and Louisiana Ave from Market Street and Laurel Ave • Concentration of commercial uses on Golden Valley Road:access to Nwy 55 via Decatur Ave, Boone Ave,and Wisconsin Ave � Concentration of commercial uses on Wayzata Blvd South Frontage Road between Nwy t69 and Winnetka Ave: access to I-394 via General Mills Blvd According to MnDOT,one of the top-ranking strategies to reduce congestion for trucks traveling within and through the Twin Cities is to provide design guidance to local governments for accommodating trucks on local roads.The guidance is intended to help local governments identify locations where land uses generate heavy truck movements, present unique traffic control needs,and demonstrate concerns for local street pavement and geometric design to accommodate heavy truck dimensions and weight.The guidance can be used to improve truck, motorist, and non- motorized vehicle safety and traffic flow.Although all business owners and residents rely on the efficient movement of goods,freight movement is often regarded as incompatible with many land uses.The Future Land Use Plan aims to minimize these conflicts by separating large industrial and commercial uses from residentia) and institutional uses. Thoughtful site planning and site plan review for new developments is also utilized to minimize conflicts. Railroads are not managed by local governments, but loca)governments must plan for the possibility of increased freight traffic in the future. Railroads Railroads accommodate the movement of freight through the community.There are four active railroad lines within the city.The four lines include: The Canadian Pacific(CP) Railway,formerly the Soo Line,operates a north-south line in Golden Valley.The line has�2 crossings and serves about four trains per day at speeds up to 25 miles per hour.This line connects with other CP lines in Crystal and Savage. In addition,an east-west spur runs parallel to Laurel Ave. It has five crossings and serves up to two trains per week at speeds of�o miles per hour. A second spur passes near Breck School and through Theodore Wirth Regional Park on its way to Minneapolis. The Union Pacific (UP) Railroad operates an east-west line that runs parallel to Nwy 55 and terminates in Plymouth. It has�2 street crossings and serves two trains per day at speeds up to�o miles per hour. 14 The BNSF Railway operates a line in the far eastern part of the City that serves two trains per day at speeds up to 25 miles per hour.The line begins in Minneapolis and terminates in Monticello, Minnesota,and it has three grade- separated roadway crossings in Golden Valley. The railroad industry nationwide is healthy because of the high energy costs related to the trucking industry. Railroad operations in Golden Valley will remain active through 2040. Nowever,significant changes in train traffic are not expected because the rail lines provide local rather than long distance service.The City will continue to advocate for the sharing the railroad right-of-way for other transportation uses like transit and multi-use bicycle and pedestrian trails. Emerging Transportafion Technologies Technologies that apply to transportation and traffic management are evolving rapidly.The City will monitor these trends for influences that may have impact on the public.The City will continue to work with its agency partners to seek opportunities to embrace technologies that may be beneficial. Autonomous Vehicles An autonomous vehicle(also known as a driverless vehicle,self-driving vehicle, robotic vehicle) is a vehicle that is capable of sensing its environment and navigating without human input. Many such systems are evolving and several pilot projects have been initiated throughout the country. Autonomous cars use a system of technologies.The first system is for genera) navigation;a GPS system provides accurate location of a road and provides the overall direction of the vehicle.The second is a system of sensors, radars, or cameras to recognize dynamic conditions(other roadway users,stopped cars, road construction, bikers, pedestrians, etc.).The third system aggregates all of the data collected from the mix of navigation sensors to provide action for the autonomous vehicle. Further technologies are under development that will allow vehicles and other objects to"speak" to one another,which will significantly enhance safety and operations. A number of direct transportation benefits could arise from the use of autonomous vehicles including, but not limited to, reduced congestion or increased mobility, improved safety for all roadway users(vehicles, bicyclists, pedestrians), and lower infrastructure costs. Other benefits may also be realized such lower insurance costs, lower fuel consumption, less need for parking, and enhanced mobility of youth, disabled, low-income, and/or elderly populations. Among the main obstacles to widespread development are technological challenges,government regulations, funding, liability, replacement of existing vehicles, and security.As autonomous vehicle technology continues to evolve and gain acceptance and use,the city will follow and evaluate the potential of such vehicles and its implications to City regulations and design requirements. Drones or Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Drones,or Unmanned Aerial Vehicles(UAVs), have become smaller, more powerful, and less expensive and as a result have become much more common sight.The Federal Aviation Administration predicts the number of drones will grow from approximately 2.5 million in 2017 to over 8 million by 2020. It is anticipated that over the next 2o years, an increasing number of drones will carry out services hundreds of feet above our roadways. Cities will need to adopt and plan for activities notjust on the ground but also in the air. Several issues surround the use of drones including safety, noise, personal intrusion, and privacy. The City will need to account for their legal limits and restrictions(land use and zoning powers)and have a solid understanding of its role in protecting the public realm by possibly designating when and where drones can operate. 15 Advanced Telecommunications Telecommunication (telecom)technologies are constantly evolving as private carriers are currently in the midst of next generation 5G implementation.As this telecom system expands, it is anticipated that there will be a need for"small cell sites"to locate within already crowded public rights-of-way.As a result,the City will track the progress of telecom technologies and determine if changes need to be made in its engineering design standards,zoning requirements, and/or permitting processes. Additional current tehnologies that are already available include the following: • On-board collision avoidance systems-Car manufacturers are currently offering various forms of driver warning systems(i.e. centerline crossing warnings)and collision avoidance systems(i.e. automatic emergency braking). • Automatic paraHel parking-Vehicles are currently on the market equipped with sensors and automated steering contro) that automatically perform a parallel parking maneuver. • GPS navigation-On-board wayfinding is commonly available in modern vehicles. • On-board breathalyzer system-This is an interlock mechanism that will immobilize the vehicle if the driver's breath indicates the presence of alcohol above a specified level. Complete Streets The City has a long history of supporting the Complete Streets philosophy,which promotes streets that are safe and convenient for all users, including pedestrians, bicyclists,transit riders,and motor vehicle drivers of all ages and abilities.The National Complete Streets Coalition notes that there is no singular design prescription for Complete Streets, but a design will likely include sidewalks, bike lanes,comfortable and accessible transit stops,safe crossings, narrower travel lanes, roundabouts, and more.The designs encourage street connectivity and aim to create a comprehensive, integrated, and connected network for all modes.The City will continue demonstrating its support for Complete Streets by incorporating its principles and design options into all transportation plans and policies. Transit System Most of Golden Valley is located in Metropolitan Council's Transit Market Area III.Service options for Market Area (II includes regular- . route local service,all-day express service,special needs paratransit " - (Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA)compliant and for senior "�'� i i ; � �,,, Y.�., citizens),and ridesharing through the Ridematch and Vanpool '� � � !� � ` � � .. �� . ro rams. Metro Transit currentl o erates man bus routes alon � � �t�" � " ' "� '- �' � �� P g Y p Y g ��°"�C�.. . Golden Valley's principal and minor arterial routes. Bus service is * ,�, more frequent during the A.M.and P.M. peak commute times. Figure '� �� ,. , ��`� ..,' ,�� i» 4•5��ustrates current transit system routes,stops, and support x"��"� � �"� ��' � � � � � �:. facilities in Golden Valley. � � ;�, �- �' �`� �, b��'�.#. r . � �*� Metro Transit operates two park and ride facilities in Golden Valley. `��` ��'�'��• . � One is located at Wayzata Boulevard and General Mills Boulevard. � � Several bus routes serve this park-and-ride facility.The parking lot has Metro Transit operates a park and ride on Wayzata Boulevard near General Mills 123 spaces and is 95 percent filled to capacity on an average weekday. A second park-and-ride facility is located along Duluth Street,just west of Hwy�oo.This park and ride facility is served by two bus routes.The parking lot has 5o spaces and is well used, however because it is a shared use lot,the actual percentage of lot capacity utilized is unclear. 16 Unique transit needs in the community are presented by populations housed in group quarters and facilities that offer specialty care services for temporarily or permanently disabled populations,such as _ _ _ � - _ _ . patients at the Courage Center.The transit needs of these populations are varied and are typically provided by specialized "�"-'�1 paratransit providers that offer express or demand-response services, � �. ��sr,(„�� such as the Metro Mobility program administered by the :�.,�,,,,.'�"'' _ ,..:_ Metropolitan Council.Transit Link is the Twin Cities dial-a-ride small �` �" "�'i �' ' �+� Y �� ' �f' } � �� ; , ,: . .. bus service for the public where regular route transit service is not ;,,� ;� : available.Transit Link is for trips that cannot be accomplished on `� "��'�"_� � ��;��-� regular transit routes alone,and may combine regular route and �`:��`��.�� `��f� ,_,,.,..�..' r � , � Transit Link service. On-demand transit providers serve senior citizens and handicapped individuals METRO Blue Line Extension The Blue Line Extension is a dedicated light rail transit(LRT)corridor that will extend from downtown Minneapolis to northern Brooklyn Park. Formerly known as the Bottineau Light Rail Transit,the line will be an extension of the existing Blue Line(Niawatha LRT) into the northwest suburbs.The line will travel out of downtown Minneapolis,through Golden Valley along the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad Corridor,then into Robbinsdale, Crystal,and Brooklyn Park,where it will end north of Nwy 610. Two Blue Line Stations are planned in Golden Valley;at Plymouth Avenue/Theodore Wirth Park and at Golden METRO Blue Line Extension Valley Road near the Theodore Wirth Parkway �i (Bottineau LRT) intersection.The Plymouth Avenue/Theodore Wirth Park Oqeration and Maintenance January 2017 Facility(OMF) station will provide convenient access to Wirth Chalet �,� Oak Grove Parkway and the amenities of the park.The Golden Valley Road station will include a 90 space park and ride facility and 93rdAvenue „oa„ 61 - � , " F'�°•°�°r�°"Light Rail will also serve as a trailhead for the three existing and w Alignment 85th Avenua p E��y^��°^ planned bicycle and pedestrian routes that converge at """`.` Light Rait Stations the station. As part of the project,a new grade-separated � � o os , s " trail connection will be built to the west of the existing erook�y„81„a �A� � � ""i188 � w�� rail corridor to connect Theodore Wirth Park with `'� Sochacki Park. �,,, �`�1 's, � , f9 Enhanced Metro Transit bus service is planned to ss.dn�e��e " " support ridership at the Golden Valley Road station. ""°��.,.�„ While bicycle racks will be present at both stations, eass�ake Raaa �' additional racks will be included at the Golden Valley '�`''' '°° Road station.The feasibility of a City circulator or other ; ,_„�•.;t "`""'E shared mobility option will continue to be explored. = Robbinatlale � ::� Construction is anticipated to begin in 2o�q with fare ° service beginning in 2022.Three bridges in Golden Valley �i,a Go�den Valley Road n � �a will need to be reconstructed in order to accommodate °`"`^v"`;m ,•0 �,e Plymouth Av�ue/ ccP �r `�g� light rail: Plymouth Avenue Bridge,Theodore Wirth Theodore Wirth Park Q0 Ja .�a�- o_:o kE„�.,, � � Bridge, and Golden Valley Road Bridge. In addition,the C� = 5 intersection of Golden Valley Road and Theodore Wirth Parkway will be rebuilt to include stoplights and "4 improved bicycle and pedestrian facilities. �.� � �..r 17 Figure 4.5: Transit System Map ------_..---------• �� : i 100 ! �': + + . ,5�.,. ' • 1 : � . I , � � � i ; � i r : � �� M i ' e a d � ` ' � ; . � , �, � ' ' � � .. �, � �'i1'�"�"�' ....,, ' ' ; � _ 4---.� l '_ i � 'i ,` � ¢ I a � � �1_ � t -'---_"_•._� z� � � t �--�---�-- . .� E �_ - �.r � ; � � � �� 1 l � � jT �� x � ! � 169 � it _ Z i.��t��_e Ou t�$ , o� n Vail R I � � : , ; . ._ a, . - . : � > . , � � ( . t � t ,' o-, � , , � , � � � � � g � x ; . �. . % i .. , aq rS ` t � i , , , � t , � , � { ; � -�-� a r , � , �w 3 , _ � : f � _ : a �� r ; .s i . ,L_i__�_i r � � ' � � , � � � � _,__ ..ti,�'` .� ��oti�,��.,�_ � �._. �,J""�, , , . �, � � � � � � �� r y ��, . �- j ._ � � , .-..-.n._� � -- �� . �_ �. _,_._ ,� � r . .r . t . � -�r--- • I .«,>. # ; . , . � . . _ _.:__ k� , 4... . a � � .. .. s.......... � �'� b._ _-�r �, �,� . � , , , � � , , �. ss� � � �, �. � �. . ,--, I � ' � - � ss w.,..,.,.�._�� a , ' D�. .. '�� ,:'� ,.�' . �- , y m� . . � . . m� � � G�Q . i�.�• i . m �k'p . . . . �(�.V2' . � _ OQ. �� o rro••.,:,"_..,iy.-..r.— J .�......_. � � ' 9e \en,N4 � n,- , :, : �. � 'i? � G 169 Qa j y - .._"_"_.1 � � _ � t00 � � F. .. , . . . ,� � � _�� I ; �, - �� , . �- ---� R ` �, , , 'c , . ,_, . 3' +?>+� � � ..._� - , >� P _M, '� , J � Y...,:___..-----•-------•---= _ � . � _ ,_� � c� _ � 1 . , � . , � , t, ��` , I . ' I � � � --•------_.._..� - _ . + � Legend � Blue Line Metro Transit Bus Routes Transit Stations Blue Line Light Rail Transit � ParkAndRideLots ' (Bottineau) � Bus Stops � Southwest LRT 0 0.25 0.5 1 Mile l � 1 � 1 Sources: Hennepin County Surveyors Office for Property Lines(2017), City of Golden Valley for all other layers(2017). 18 Nwy i69 Mobility Studx Figure 4.6: Highway�69 Mobility Study Area MnDOT,Scott County, and Metro Transit have completed a Lsgend preliminary study to assess opportunities for improved a� ,�-,;,�s„�p„ an-�;�8�iro� mobility and safety along the Nwy t6q corridor from Shakopee ProximirytoExlshngParkandRWe � --o— &ue Lirre�LRT)and Stations � to downtown Minneapolis.The study included consideration '�� GreenUne�LRT)arMSWlions � � Orarge Line{8RT) pie .� Shared al nmenl fa BRT 8 � �� of MnPASS hi hwa travel ex ress lanes alon Nw �6 and '� c.�n� ,;�' �.4 cP , g y p g y 9 BRT abgnmem Sor Altemative 1 Mills yt.�° poJ� Qmc 1yo� Bus Rapid Transit(BRT)along the entire length of the study BRTe,;9�,.��„aa,�,�,�z �„�.,.�.,, area.Two routing options were considered for BRT in Golden ��<.�,n,.,,, :�.�.: Valle . Fi ure 4.6 shows that Alternative� follows the I-394 �� `°""`'�' °ak Y g Lake Rd• AYQ �Q corridor with BRT stations at General Mills Boulevard, o,,,,,,,,,,�, Louisiana Avenue, and Xenia Avenue/Park Place. Alternative Minimapqlis 2 follows Nwy 55 with BRT stations at General Mills ��D��S ��35� rF Boulevard, Winnetka Avenue, Douglas Drive, and Theodore 'm$'� ,��' ,.�„., Wirth Parkway.The City Council adopted a resolution ♦ BronRd ;;,,,�;;. • ; �*'` Ave supporting the Nwy 55 BRT route through Golden Valley. � Additional environmental,operations, and design studies are needed to further develop the project. No funding nor " '�ingDr1 Washington Ava implementation schedule has been identified. I-�ighway 55 BRT � P�o��r�e�i � Qa The City is very supportive of the concept of frequent, high- �ea � quality transit service in the form of BRT on Nwy 55.The � �.s�`�� ''' Future Land Use Plan supports increased transit options and "'�'' _ � �- s�,mn�age c��:�g f�rovides o ortunities for redevelo ment in the downtown ' s.��. E F�.E� �s�s�,�«,,,�,N�REME�TP pf� p o o_s � z s a �� e � �,� E �;��K'�,e..,K�.ed area of Golden Valley as well as along Douglas Drive, both of "''�°� `;°, �� " " `m�a°"s °""° ,�t s which intersect potential stations for future BRT on Nighway 55.This project is not yet listed in the Metropolitan Council's 204o Transportation Policy Plan (TPP),which is required in order to receive federal and regional funding for implementation.The Nwy�69 Mobility Study is the first step toward that goal.The City will continue to support further planning and design of the Nwy 55 BRT option in the coming years. Bicycle and Pedestrian Network Golden Valley has 54.3 miles of local sidewalks and trails.There are also�2.8 miles of regional trails and 5•4 miles of on- street bicycle lanes in Golden Valley.These facilities are for non-motorized vehicle and pedestrian use.Some sidewalks are denoted for pedestrian only use. Many local sidewalks and trails connect to the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board's (MPRB)trails in Theodore Wirth Regional Park and Three Rivers Park District regional trails in the community. Nennepin County has also identified a series of corridors appropriate for additional on-street and off- street bikeway facilities in Golden Valley.Community members have expressed a strong interest for additional pedestrian and bicycle facilities that are comfortable and safe for users of all ages and abilities.The City has a long history of implementing these types of facilities and wil) continue to prioritize this work in the future. Local Nefwork Paved local sidewalks and off-street trails are (ocated within or adjacent to each of the community's parks and recreation areas as well as the city's minor arterial and collector roadways. Figure 4.7 identifies the (ocation of local sidewalks and trails in the community. Regional Nefwork There are three off-street, multi-use regional trails located in the City.Theodore Wirth Regional Trail runs in a north- south direction through Theodore Wirth Regional Park. It is maintained by the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board. The Bassett Creek Regional Trail connects to a pedestrian bridge over Nwy�oo adjacent to Unity Ave near Briarwood 19 Nature Area.This regional trail connects west and north from the pedestrian bridge to the trail system in Bassett Creek park and adjacent residential neighborhoods in Crystal and French Regional Park in Plymouth.The eastern portion will be constructed in the coming years, primarily on Golden Valley Road from Regent Avenue to Theodore Wirth Parkway.The trail is maintained by Three Rivers Park District,which also maintains the Luce Line Regional Trail. The Luce Line Regional Trail runs east-west and enters the city at Nwy�69• It runs through the center of the city before terminating at Theodore Wirth Regional Trail. Bicycle and Pedestrian P►an In 2o�b,the City established a Bicycle and Pedestrian Planning Task Force to review the City's assessment of bicycle and pedestrian facilities in the community.The Task Force provided input on the needs within the community,which were incorporated into the Policy Plan of this Chapter, as well as a map of recommended routes and intersection improvements.The map is shown in Figure 4.7 and the detailed list is located in the appendix of this chapter. Funding sources and potential partnerships with other agencies were also identified during this planning process. Bicycle Route (mprovements Since most of the roadways in Golden Valley have been reconstructed in the last 25 years, reconstruction is not expected again on most roadways for many decades. During reconstruction,the City has the opportunity to build sidewalks, multi-use trails,or protected bike lanes at a fraction of the cost of stand-alone projects. It is more cost- effective to complete many of these bicycle and pedestrian improvements at that time. In the meantime, City staff wil) implement improvements that balance the space and cost constraints on current roadways. Projects will be implemented as financial resources become available or redevelopment opportunities arise. Signed bicycle routes with wayfinding signage as wel) as on-street bicycle lanes can be constructed with mill and overlay projects,which occur in a shorter timeframe than road reconstruction.Signs can be erected on these routes as a routine maintenance activity.The City divides its maintenance program into five geographic zones. Each year, staff will implement the projects identified within that zone. Pedestrian Route Improvements The City has focused on implementing pedestrian routes for several decades. Nearly all major roadways in Golden Valley have a sidewalk or trail (ocated on at least one side of the roadway.Through 2040,the City will focus on the following improvements for the pedestrian network: • Fill important gaps in the existing sidewalk network • Prioritize the enhancement of crossings and intersections for pedestrian safety and comfort • Continue bringing existing facilities into compliance with the standards established by the Americans with Disabilities Act • Continue to conduct regularly scheduled maintenance on existing pedestrian facilities • Explore options for improving winter maintenance(snow removal)of existing and future facilities Implementation Implementation of bicycle and pedestrian network improvements will occur as opportunities arise and financial resources become available. Exact timing of implementation will depend on funding, staff time,grant funding,and opportunities to partner with other organizations and property owners. It is important that City staff evaluate the assumptions that were made when this plan was created and update the plan as assumptions change.These assumptions include cost estimates,financial resources,future population and employment growth projections,the City's Future Land Use Plan, existing technologies and best practices,community and City Council input on goals and priorities, existing roadway classifications, rate of accidents involving bicyclists or pedestrians, destinations within the community, and other factors that affect implementation. 20 Figure 4.7: Bicycle and Pedestrian Network i ' - -- -- ---i hw � .� ---r , ; t� � ; ;�ool ! � I `` � � �a I j ' � Medicine Lake Rd � � 1 � �_ ' i �' ' E ,' � t � '--- -- � y � � � .., , ` ' I �' �- _ _ . 4 + { ' r � � r i ( � L '� • � � t , � , � -' , � � � � ' . ._ �_. �� , � _ � . �j � � � �. . � . � .. � ,i. . �.` ` i� � . 169 ' '' { "1_�'1'-- p�h'� St • Iden Val�e R� - \ . . : Z . . ��,.. � r� , �.. . _ .. / , .m .. . , ..� . ;Q .Y ' � i = '-,...-r-`�+�' - � �- - � �� } � . , �, , � �� , a , � � �� 1 , . � 3 . , � : � ♦ � ' ' �_ L i._ � ; . � �1� .�.,. .. . _.� . i !i � S� � ,r._.„ < ` , .ti ,� e � ♦ _ ,�. -�-"'"°:.. .�= i i � odo� � ° • , ��,�; t I �- ,�-. �"' , �. ' � , � . � i ,� I I � ;' � r y � ,� � ( _ ,,• � � 1 ,. ,,, ___--__�� -,, �- �\� -------- .,�^ . , _ . . , . � � m � t _ ,.G�_ �� `\ ��,, , � �C � � �� -r � �� - _ � �; _ , ,_ ,�; � � � ------� , Q. / .r. _ h � _ .� � i �ss Y ----- ; ', � =;--�. �. i �oo' - I : -� � � ..,m v . ; v , �_ , .___ .. :� ,c � � � �� /'� � • — � � . .. � '� � ----1—�=---- -- ''� � ' I _l ""� ' ♦ + — — — -"�; , /� � � � . / � � �..»..�_ .� . r __�__I Y}'� '; �. � � Legend � ` ' ♦ Connects to Trail System --- Bike Lane Existing Paved Trails, in Adjacent Ciry Enhanced Sharrow Sidewalks, 8 Bikeways Identified Intersections • For Potential Crossing --- Multi-Use Trail Local Trails and Sidewalks Treatments ___ Regional Multi-Use Trail Regional Trails �s Multi-Use Trail Connection ___ protected Bikeway Unpaved Trails Signed Bike Route - Facility Type TBD ----� To Be Constructed(2017-2018) --- Sidewalk 0 ozs o.s � nn�� i � i � i Sources: Hennepin County Surveyors Office for Property Lines(2017), City of Golden Valley for all other layers(2017). 21 Aviation Facilities No airports, heliports, or seaplane operations are currently located or planned for Golden Valley. Although there are no airport facilities in Golden Valley,the community is located northwest of the Minneapolis/St-Paul International Airport and south of the Crystal Airport, both of which are owned and operated by the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC).These airports each distribute air traffic over Golden Valley. The safety of the air traffic over Golden Valley is a concern for local officials and protection of the airspace travel lanes is included as part of construction authorization. The Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) Federal Aviation Regulations requires that any new construction planned to exceed 20o feet above ground level must be approved by the FAA as well as the Minnesota Department of Transportation. Existing structures within Golden Valley that exceed 20o feet in height are limited and include utility and telecommunications towers at scattered locations in the community.The tallest structure in Golden Valley is a 400-foot communications tower in the northwest quadrant of the community owned and operated by Nennepin County.There are no commercial or residential buildings in the community that currently exceed 20o feet. The Minneapolis-St Paul International Airport(MSP) is the closest commercial airport that serves Golden Valley. One of two main runways at MSP distributes arriving and departing aircraft in airspace over Golden Valley. Depending on weather conditions and the time of the year,air traffic over Golden Valley can exceed 40o commercial operations daily.Golden Valley's distance from MSP buffers it from being included in the MAC's 2007 noise policy area.Golden Valley is also outside the MAC's 2007 noise policy area for its reliever airport in Crystal. Sub-Area Plans Sub-area plans provide guidance for key redevelopment areas and other areas in need of improvements in the future. Downfown West Planning District Nwy lbq and Nwy 55 Interchange Area (NE Quadrant) To serve changing land uses in the area,transportation improvements are programmed for a portion of the district between Mendelssohn Ave and Boone Ave along 7th Ave, Decatur Ave,and Golden Valley Road.Changes will include street and sidewalks improvements plus a safety improvement at the right-in/right-out access to Decatur Ave from Nwy 55.As site redevelopment occurs in this area, the City will continue to require that site access points be safely located and configured and that traffic impacts on the roadway network be mitigated in recognition of existing capacity constraints at the Nwy 55 intersection with Boone Ave and also the proximity to the congested operating conditions along Nwy 169. Winnetka Ave and Nwy 55 (SE Quadrant) The City's Future Land Use Plan indicates a change to medium density residential land use.Winnetka Avenue south of NWy 55 operates near its capacity in the peak periods. Land uses that do not contribute significant peak period traffic flow should be encouraged. Access management guidelines should be observed and enforced to avoid impacts to traffic safety and flow on a roadway that already experiences congested flow during the peak periods. Direct access to Winnetka Ave should not be allowed; site access should be planned to Narold Ave or Rhode Island Ave.The addition of a westbound right turn lane on Narold Ave approaching Winnetka Ave and the southerly extension of the northbound right lane on Winnetka Ave from Narold Ave to Nwy 55 would be beneficial to traffic operations. Right-of- way dedication to accommodate these improvements should be considered when site redevelopment occurs. �-394 Corridor Districf The City's Future Land Use Plan identifies retail, office, and mixed uses along the corridor generally between I-394 and Laure) Ave from Pennsylvania Ave to Nwy�oo. Freeway access to this area is served by interchanges on I-3q4 at Louisiana Ave and at Xenia Ave. Local roadway system performance is subject to monitoring and review as defined in the I-394 Overlay District that applies to land uses in Golden Valley as well as in St. �ouis Park. 22 Xenia Ave Area Much of the residential and office sites on near Xenia Ave have been constructed or will soon be occupied. Roadway, sidewalk, and safety improvements will continue to be made as the development of these parcels is completed. When significant occupancy is achieved, the City should monitor and assess traffic operations and safety in the Xenia Ave corridor to inform future potential infill development in the corridor. Nwy�oo/I-394 Interchange Area (SW Quadrant) The West End shopping center in its surrounding area is (ocated in the City of Golden Valley and the City of St. Louis Park. Nigh-density redevelopment is expected to continue. Traffic impacts related to the proposed Central Park West development have been studied and several improvement needs were identified that affect traffic operations in Golden Valley-only some of which have been implemented. Specific elements yet to be constructed include traffic calming,safety and trail improvements on Wayzata Blvd between Quentin Ave and France Aven, I-394 east bound entrance ramp capacity improvements to maximize capacity of the I-394/Nwy�oo interchange and collector- distributor roadway, and traffic signal interconnection and coordination (timing plans)of signals on Park Place Blvd and on Xenia Ave. Market Street Extension Extension of Market St between Louisiana Ave and Pennsylvania Ave would provide improved access and circulation in the western end of the I-394 Corridor District. Extension should be considered if land use changes are proposed by adjacent owners. Travel Demand Management Plans (TDMP) The I-394 Overlay District regulations require that at TDMP be developed for sites that generate a significant number of daily or peak period trips. The scope of the TDMP for a given site will be prepared at the expense of the developer to the satisfaction of the Cities of Golden Valley and St. Louis Park. TDMP requirements could include traffic capacity and safety mitigation through a variety of on-site or off-site management strategies. Douglas Drive Corridor Planning Districf Douglas Drive has been reconstructed from Nwy 55 to Medicine Lake Road.Safety, intersection control, sidewalk, and trail improvements have been implemented. While the larger corridor construction improvements have been made, additional improvements are desirable. NWy 55 and Douglas Drive The intersection of Nwy 55 and Douglas Drive experiences congestion and safety problems including operation issues on the south side of the intersection due to minimal separation between the frontage road and Nwy 55. Pedestrian crossings of Nwy 55 are also a concern including the safety of students crossing the highway from the transit stop north of the highway to attend Perpich Center for Arts Education School on the south side. An improvement concept has been identified and agreed upon by the City, Nennepin County,and MnDOT that creates a larger separation from Nwy 55 to the south frontage road and controls the frontage road intersection with a mini-roundabout. A pedestrian underpass would be included to provide safe crossing opportunities for pedestrians and students.The City will continue cooperative efforts with MnDOT and Nennepin County to fund the improvements. Country Club Drive / Frontage Road Extension As part of the Douglas Drive project, direct access from Country Club Drive to Douglas Drive north of Nwy 55 has been eliminated as a safety improvement. The access was realigned to operate as a right-in/right-out between Country Club Drive and Nwy 55•To improve local street connectivity it is desirable to extend Country Club Drive northerly to join the existing signalized intersection of Douglas Drive and the North Hwy 55 Frontage Road east of Douglas Drive. Extension of Country Club Drive would require right of way to be acquired from the currently vacant site in the northwest quadrant of Nwy 55 and Douglas Drive. 23 Other Sub-Areas Nwy 169 from I-394 to Nwy 55 MnDOT,Scott County, and the Metropolitan Council are engaged in a regional mobility study for Nwy 769.This study is evaluating MnPASS and Bus Rapid Transit opportunities between Shakopee and Minneapolis along the Nwy�69, I- 394, and Nwy 55 corridors.Golden Valley will continue to be cooperative and supportive of this study with the goal of resolving existing safety and capacity problems on the Nwy�69 corridor due to closely spaced interchanges and improving transit service within the city. Golden Valley Road Light Rail Transit Stop The Metropolitan Council's Blue Line Light Rail Transit(LRT) project includes a transit station near the intersection of Golden Valley Road and Theodore Wirth Parkway. Intersection improvements and a traffic signal are planned with the Blue Line project to resolve existing safety issues at the intersection and more safely facilitate the increase in pedestrian and bicycle traffic.The City plans additional trail improvements along routes to and from the LRT station (see the Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan). The City will coordinate with Metro Transit to improve transit service along Golden Valley Road to serve the new demand generated by the Blue Line Extension. Nwy�oo/Nwy 55 Interchange Area (NW Quadrant) Land use changes are planned in this area to accommodate potential industrial expansion. Area roadways operate within their capacities today and in are still expected to in 2040. Access planning and site layout guidelines should be employed as new land uses in this area are defined so that new problems are not created. Problems that have been reported in the area due to existing uses include: pedestrian crossing issues between existing industrial sites; on street parking issues; driveway location issues;and truck access issues. Best practices for site design and access management should be followed to correct existing deficiencies and avoid new operational and safety issues on the streets. Nwv 55 South Frontage Road east of Glenwood Ave The intersection of Glenwood Ave and the Nwy 55 South Frontage Road occurs immediately adjacent to the Glenwood Ave and Nwy 55 intersection. Access to and from the frontage road creates safety conflicts with vehicles approaching Nwy 55 from the south or waiting to be served by the traffic signal. Closure of the frontage road access to Glenwood Ave should be considered creating a street served by access only from the east. A cul-de-sac should be planned to allow turn-around maneuvers by passenger vehicles,delivery trucks, school buses,and street maintenance trucks. Dedication of right-of-way for the cul-de-sac should be considered if subdivision of residential lots is considered. Glenwood Ave & Ottawa Ave The Breck School campus is located northerly of Glenwood Ave with primary site access provided from Ottawa Ave. School arrival and dismissal activity creates traffic congestion in both directions along Glenwood Ave, especially between Ottawa Ave and the Nwy�oo ramp intersections.The school employs Golden Valley Community Service Officers to routinely perform intersection traffic control at the Ottawa Ave intersection and at the easterly Nwy�oo ramp intersection on school days. Resolution of the congestion problem without the need for traffic control officers will require roadway capacity and intersection control improvements. If expansion of the school site or enrollment increases are considered,the roadway capacity and traffic control improvements should be made. 24 POLICY PLAN The Policy Plan for this Chapter includes a set of long-term goals and objectives that will be fulfilled through specific actions and policy decisions.The Policy Plan is a long-range document that expresses the values of the community and establishes a vision. It provides direction and guidance for the future of the City in terms of policymaking, improvements, programs, investments, priorities, and work plans. It can be utilized for decision-making purposes by elected officials, commissions, boards,staff, and other interested members of the community. The Policy Plan is updated every�o years based on new data and community feedback as required by Minnesota law. Goal �: Preserve and Enhance the Transportation System Protect the public investment in transportation infrastructure through regular maintenance and management. Construct new facilities to standards that minimize maintenance and environmental impacts. Objectives 1. Proactively maintain the existing transportation system by making scheduled improvements to replace worn or obsolete components 1.7 Employ cost-effective maintenance practices to maximize the lifespan of city infrastructure �.2 Continue the Pavement Management Program to reconstruct and maintain facilities following best practices that manage life cycle costs and minimize environmental impact 7.3 Transition to the Infrastructure Renewal Program to preserve, maintain, and rehabilitate infrastructure 1.4 Encourage the State legislature to provide stable, long-term roadway funding for capital improvements and maintenance Z. Enhance the transportation system with environmentally sustainable project design to the extent practical in order to minimize the impacts of the transportation system on the City's environment s.� Reduce impervious surface within public right-of-way to the extent feasible 2.2 Incorporate green infrastructure that enhances water quality and reduces stormwater runoff in transportation infrastructure to the extent possible 3. Enhance the transportation system in a way that is inclusive of all populations and their needs 3•1 Address the unique transportation needs of an aging population 3.� Continue to make improvements to existing infrastructure that comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act 3.3 Ensure that low-income residents and employees have safe and cost-effective travel options 4. Preserve the existing transportation network through right-of-way preservation and acquisition 4•7 Continue to utilize zoning and subdivision regulations to preserve right-of-way 4.� Employ right-of-way preservation strategies that proactively limit the need for acquisition at a future date 25 4.3 Acquire additional right-of-way when necessary while minimizing impacts to existing residences and businesses Goal 2: Improve the Functionality and Safety of the Roadway Network Improve mobility for efficient movement of people and goods on the local and regional roadway network. Improve safety for motorized and non-motorized traffic. Objectives 1. Increase safety by reducing crashes on the roadway network, especially at intersections 1.7 Prioritize improvements that eliminate known safety issues within the network l.z Make traffic more compatible with lower speed bicycling and walking on local streets by employing traffic calming measures �.3 Implement intersection improvements that reduce vehicle crashes involving bicycles and pedestrians 7.4 Provide strategic enforcement of traffic laws in targeted areas where repeated violations occur �.5 Coordinate with other agencies to study opportunities for roadway safety improvements on Nwy i69 Z. Balance the need for mobility and accessibility within the roadway network 2.7 Provide access to the local street system in a manner that balances safety and efficiently with the need for access to land 2.2 Minimize and consolidate driveway entrances as opportunities arise and discourage driveway entrances along arterial roadways 3• (ncorporate new technologies and innovative best practices into transportation project design, planning,and asset management 3.7 Increase the operational efficiency of the roadway network with advanced traffic operation technologies 3.Z Continue to explore and incorporate new and emerging technologies to construct, rehabilitate, maintain, and manage public assets and infrastructure in an efficient,cost-effective manner 3•3 Monitor potential impacts on the transportation system that may arise with emerging vehicle technologies,such as automated and connected vehicles 3•4 Plan, design, and maintain infrastructure to accommodate emerging vehicle technology, most notably automated and connected vehicles 4• Utilize Travel Demand Management(TDM) practices and land use planning principles to reduce congestion and increase mobility 4.7 Implement a transportation system that supports the Future Land Use Plan 4•Z Require development proposals with potential for significant traffic impacts to prepare a traffic impact study or TDM plan and make improvements that mitigate impacts determined in the study 26 4•3 Encourage joint and shared parking, car sharing, ride sharing(car pools and vanpools), bicycle parking, and increased transit use 5. Accommodate the efficient movement of goods within the city while minimizing the impacts of freight traffic on adjacent land uses 5.� Maintain a network of truck routes that ensures the safe and efficient delivery of goods to businesses 5.� Direct truck traffic to a limited number of streets with the appropriate weight limits 5.3 Continue to consolidate and cluster industrial land uses in the city 5.4 Invest in safety improvements along viable railroad corridors as necessary Goal 3: Expand the Bicycle and Pedestrian Network in Order to Provide a Balanced System of Transportation Alternatives Expand sidewalk, multi-use trail, and on-street 6icycle facilities to provide greater opportunity to choose alternative modes of travel. Improve existing non-motorized transportation infrastructure systems. Objecfives 7. Ensure that local and regional destinations are accessible by biking and walking 7.� Prioritize the construction of routes and intersection improvements near destinations such as Brookview Community Center, Blue Line (ight rail stations, schools, parks and nature areas, downtown, retail centers, senior housing developments, healthcare facilities, and the West End �.2 Improve the bicycle and pedestrian environment in the downtown area to ensure it is a safe and enjoyable place to walk �.3 Encourage healthy lifestyles by creating loop routes that can be utilized for outdoor recreationa) purposes 7.4 Continue to create and enforce standards for building placement and site design to create a pedestrian-friendly environment 2. Seek opportunities with other agencies and property owners to construct new bicycle and pedestrian routes, fil)gaps in the network, and make improvements to intersections 2.7 Collaborate with other agencies to implement recommended improvements to the network 2.2 Work with adjacent Cities to implement consistent facility treatments across municipal boundaries 2•3 Apply for grant funding as projects become eligible and pursue opportunities for funding through corporate sponsorships and redevelopment projects �.4 Request bond funding from the State legislature for large infrastructure projects that include bicycle and pedestrian facilities 3. Prioritize the implementation of primary north-south bicycle routes in the network 27 3.7 Prioritize improvements to north-south connections to the Luce Line Regional Trail 3.2 Prioritize improvements to the north-south crossings at Nwy 55 and I-394 4. Implement a multi-modal system that balances space and financial constraints 4•1 Implement cost-effective bicycle facilities by utilizing existing road width when roads are scheduled for pavement replacement 4.z Reevaluate facility options when roads are scheduled for reconstruction and build multi-use trails, buffered bikeways, or protected bikeway as well as sidewalks when feasible Goal 4: Maximize Safety, Comfort, and Convenience for Bicyclists and Pedestrians Provide and maintain sidewalks, off-road trails,and on-street bicycle facilities to a high standard for the comfort and safety of use by pedestrians and bicyclists of all ages and abilities. Objectives 7. Identify and remove safety challenges for pedestrians and bicyclists at intersections, particularly on principle arterial roadways �.7 Continue to monitor accidents with bicyclists and pedestrians and prioritize the improvement of facilities that reduce potential for accidents 7.2 Work with MnDOT to improve intersections on Nwy 55 for bicyclists and pedestrians,with consideration for grade-separated crossings 7.3 Continue enhancing existing pedestrian facilities to comply with standards established in the Americans with Disabilities Act 7.4 Prioritize the construction of sidewalks and trails along roadways in locations that are identified as uncomfortable or unsafe for pedestrians 2. Design routes and facilities that are comfortable for users of all ages and abilities 2.1 Build multi-use trails in identified locations to maximize comfort and safety 2.2 Provide a clear separation between different modes of transportation 2.3 Prioritize the construction of sidewalks and trails along roadways in locations that are identified as uncomfortable or unsafe for pedestrians, particularly on arterial routes 2•4 Apply industry best practices for pedestrian and bicycle facility design �.5 Integrate state of the art safety features in pedestrian and bicycle facility improvements 3. Ensure that the bicycle and pedestrian network is a convenient and easily understood system 3.1 Fill gaps in the network to maximize connectivity and convenience 28 3.2 Provide consistent wayfinding signage on bicycle and pedestrian routes that includes mileage to major destinations, including routes in adjacent cities 3•3 Provide bicycle racks at destinations located along existing and planned bicycle routes 3.4 Strive for a consistent design in bicycle and pedestrian facilities for the entire length of a route 4. Provide information that educates and builds awareness on safety precautions 4.7 Review City Sidewalk Policy for bicyclists, make adjustments to policy as bicycle and pedestrian network expands,and educate the public on this topic 4.� Develop an education campaign on bicycle and pedestrian safety and motorist awareness 4•3 Explore programming that encourages walking and biking in Golden Valley 5. Encourage year-round walking and biking by ensuring that winter maintenance of bicycle and pedestrian facilities is adequately addressed 5.� Continue providing winter maintenance on bicycle and pedestrian facilities in the city 5.� Evaluate the option of shifting winter maintenance responsibilities to property owners 5•3 Consider enhancing volunteer opportunities to ensure timely winter maintenance Goal 5: Support and Promote Increased Transit Usage Support and promote increased transit usage by improving connectivity, improved accessibility, and reliability of the transit services. Objectives 7. Advocate for additional transit options and the enhancement of existing services to ensure that community members have safe,affordable,and practical transit options 1.7 Collaborate with regional partners to prioritize transit service and capita) improvements along the network major transportation corridors in the community, particularly Nwy 55 1.2 Take an active role in transit studies conducted by other agencies in order to advocate for increased transit in Golden Valley 7•3 Continually assess and report the changing transit needs of area residents and visitors to transit providers 7•4 Advocate for enhancements to highly used transit stops in the community 2. Ensure that redevelopment projects are served with optimal, high-quality transit facilities and services s.1 Focus redevelopment efforts near high-frequency transit service and implement transit oriented development policies in these areas 2.2 Pursue development of a circulator system within the City that includes access to light rail stations Z•3 Incorporate transit stations and stops into site design for redevelopment projects as applicable 29 3. Promote the benefits of transit to funders, residents, and business owners 3.7 Encourage the state legislature to provide stable, long-term transit funding 3.Z Encourage employers to offer incentives for employees,guests,and clients to utilize transit 3.3 Educate residents about the relationship between development density and transit Goal 6: Integrate Community Values and Character into the Transportation System Employ a context sensitive design approach to integrate transportation infrastructure with natural resources, bicycle and pedestrian facilities, public art, community resilience and sustainability,public realm improvements,and other features that represent community values, character,and identity. Objectives 7. Provide aesthetic treatments in public rights-of-way that are appropriate for the scale of the area, conform with selected community themes,and can be maintained within the City's financial resources 7.7 Balance a variety of community needs, interests, and values into the design process for transportation projects while maintaining a priority on safety and efficiency 7.2 Include public realm improvements such as seating and public art in prominent public rights-of-way 7.3 Encourage beautification of local roadways with amenities such as boulevard trees, native plantings, and decorative street lighting in appropriate (ocations �•4 Place utilities underground wherever possible with the assistance from the utility provider when the adjacent street is reconstructed 2. Continue to incorporates the community's values, identity, and character into public right-of-way projects z.7 Integrate community input, land use plans,and transportation needs into the long-term vision for transportation corridors 2.2 Incorporate community resilience and sustainability practices into transportation infrastructure projects Z.3 Continue to assess whether enhancements to the transportation system are inclusive of all populations and their needs 30 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN The Implementation Plan for this Chapter includes a set of specific actions to accomplish the goals and objectives set forth in the Policy Plan. It differs from the Policy Plan in that it provides the opportunity to easily measure progress and note tangible outcomes from each task. Each task provides an approximate cost estimate for the work and notes a timeframe in which the specific action should take place. Tasks are prioritized based on financial feasibility, staff capacity, importance or urgency for action,and other factors.The Implementation Plan is updated every 5 years (mid- cycle of the�o year Policy Plan) based on progress and new opportunities. Preserve and Enhance the Transportation System Implementation Actions: • Continue the Pavement Management Program until transitioning to the Infrastructure Renewal Program. • Transition to the(nfrastructure Renewal Program. Establish maintenance districts within the city for implementation of maintenance, preservation,and rehabilitation projects. • Provide long-term and sustainable funding for maintenance staff, equipment, and related resources to allow restoration and improvement of aged or worn infrastructure. • Address infrastructure funding in the City's legislative priorities in order to encourage the state (egislature to provide stable, (ong-term funding for capital improvements and maintenance. • Review transportation project designs for opportunities to incorporate green infrastructure.This could include rain gardens, rainwater harvesting practices,green alleys or parking(ots, pervious pavement,green roofs and walls,tree trenches and boxes, and native plantings. • Continue to make ADA improvements to existing infrastructure. • Continue employing right-of-way preservation strategies. Improve the Functionality and Safety of the Roadway Network Implementation Actions: • Conduct vehicle speed audits in areas of concern. Respond to local reports of speeding by conducting audits.Additional enforcement of speed limits or consideration for traffic calming measures may be necessary. • Monitor crash statistics for trends and tailor crash reduction improvements for targeted areas. • Review redevelopment projects for opportunities to implement roadway improvements, monitor traffic impacts, implement access management strategies, and resolve safety deficiencies. • Continue the work of the Traffic Safety Committee to review and respond to safety and traffic control issues in the city. • Assess existing network for traffic calming opportunities, particularly on local streets. • Follow MnDOT guidance on emerging vehicle technologies such as automated and connected vehicles. • Improve intersection geometry in identified areas to address safety issues and delays. • Improve traffic control at intersections in areas with a determined need in order to reduce intersection delays on signalized corridors. • Update traffic signa)phasing and timing to promote efficient traffic flow as appropriate. • Promote High Occupancy Vehicle(HOV)bypasses for congested highways such as Nighway�b9 • Require development proposals to include TDM plans or traffic impact studies when significant traffic impacts are expected. Developers are required to fund and/or construct improvements that prevent or mitigate traffic impacts. 31 Expand the Bicycle and Pedestrian Network in Order to Provide a Balanced System of Transportation Alternatives Implementation Actions: • Continue to assess existing bicycle and pedestrian facilities.Assess the condition, safety,and improvement needs of current bicycle and pedestrian facilities. • Research ways to increase bicycle mode share. Identify the locations for the highest potential bicycle trip generation and seek opportunities to increase the mode share of biking in those areas • Improve the pedestrian environment in the downtown area to ensure it is a safe, enjoyable, and accessible place to walk. Encourage strategies such as wider sidewalks for pedestrian movement,trees, landscaping, street furniture, improved transit facilities, and additional bicycle facilities. • Implement cost-effective on-street bike routes and bike lanes in conjunction with pavement marking and traffic sign replacement/maintenance program. • Conduct site plan review as redevelopment occurs to ensure that sites provide an environment conducive to walking and biking. • Require developers and property owners to install and sidewalks in identified areas as redevelopment occurs. � Conduct further study on bicycle improvements for the downtown area.Assess existing conditions in order to understand the feasibility of implementing new facilities in the area. � Utilize the City's facility design guide for the planning and construction of new bicycle and pedestrian facilities in the community. • Apply for grant funding for as projects become eligible. Monitor grant funds and match funding with projects identified in the bicycle and pedestrian plan. • Request state bond funding for large infrastructure projects. Focus on large projects that include bicycle and pedestrian improvements. Maximize Safety, Comfort, and Convenience for Bicyclists and Pedestrians Implementation Actions: • Work with MnDOT to prioritize north-south crossings at Nwy 55 and I-394• • Evaluate policy for biking on sidewalks.Assess whether bicyclists will continue to be allowed to bike on sidewalks. • Install wayfinding or directional signage in strategic locations • Educate the public on bicycle and pedestrian safety. Use CityNews,the City website,and social media. • Monitor crash data that includes bicycle and pedestrians. Prioritize improvements that reduce bicycle and pedestrian crashes in the community. • Install bicycle racks in various locations throughout the city and require installation by private property owners as redevelopment occurs. • Explore programming that encourages walking and biking. • Research methods and practices to cost-effectively enhance winter maintenance of trails and sidewalks. Support and Promote Increased Transit Usage Implementation Actions: • Continue to coordinate with Metro Transit. Continually assess the existing transit system performance and adapt to changing needs. 32 • Take an active role in transit studies. Promote additional transit in Golden Valley by participating in transit studies conducted by other agencies. • Require and build transit-friendly infrastructure in planning districts.The planning districts are identified in the Future Land Use Plan. • Advocate for enhancements to transit stops. Focus on the heavily used transit stops in the community that lack amenities such as heating. • Research circulator system options.Access to the light rail and major employers should be a focus of any research. • Advocate for additional transit funding from the state legislature.Stable, long-term transit funding is necessary in order to meet the transit goals of Golden Valley and surrounding communities. • Develop educational material about density and transit. Educate residents about the necessary relationship between density and transit. Integrate Community Values and Character into the Transportation System Implementation Actions: • Assess the condition of existing aesthetic treatments in the righl-of-way.This may include landscaping, decorative lighting,wayfinding or interpretive signage, benches. Determine maintenance needs and opportunities for improvement. • Apply a uniform design scheme in the right-of-way.This would apply to landscaping,signage, lighting, benches,and other features in the right-of-way. • Identify locations appropriate for public art.This could include gateway locations or community spaces. • Work with regional transportation partners to incorporate local design schemes and aesthetic treatment themes chosen by the community into projects. • Secure funding partnerships to construct and maintain unique public infrastructure.This could include corporate sponsorships and partnerships with non-profit organizations,schools,and other community groups or individuals. • Research ways to incorporate racial equity evaluations into transportation planning and design. • Continue to gather community input for the planning and design of transportation projects in the city. • Bury existing overhead utilities with projects as resources and opportunities arise. Summary of Implementation Actions Action Estimated Cost Timeframe Ongoing Preserve and Enhance the Transportation System Continue the Pavement Management Pro ram �� O-5 years Transition to the Infrastructure Renewal Pro ram $$� O-2o years Provide long-term and sustainable funding for maintenance $$� O-2o years X Address infrastructure funding in the Cit 's le islative riorities $ 0-5 years Review transportation project designs for opportunities to incorporate green $ 0-2o years X infrastructure Continue to make ADA improvements to existin infrastructure �� O-2o years X 33 Continue employing right-of-way reservation strate ies $ O-5 years X Improve the Functionality and Safety of the Roadway Network Conduct vehicle speed audits in areas of � X concern Monitor crash statistics $ X Review redevelo ment ro'ects $ X Continue the work of the Traffic Safety Committee $ X Assess existing network for traffic calming 0 ortunities � 5-�O years X Follow MnDOT guidance on emerging vehicle technolo ies $ 0-5 years X Im rove intersection eometr $$ O-5 ears Im rove traffic control at intersections $$ 0-5 ears U date traffic si nal hasin and timin $$ 0-5 ears Promote Nigh Occupancy Vehicle (NOV) b asses $ 5-10 years X Require development proposals to include TDM lans or traffic im act studies � 0-5 years X Expand the Bicycle and Pedestrian Network in Order to Provide a Balanced System of Transportation Alternatives Continue to assess existing bicycle and edestrian facilities � 0-5 years X - Research ways to increase bicycle mode share � 5-�o years Improve the pedestrian environment in the downtown area �� 5-�o years Implement cost-effective on-street bike routes $ O-5 years X Conduct site lan review $ 0-5 ears X Require developers and property owners to install and maintain sidewalks � 0-5 years X Conduct further study on bicycle im rovements for the downtown area � 0-5 years Utilize the Cit 's facilit desi n uide $ 0-5 ears X Apply for grant funding for as projects become eli ible $ 0-5 years X Request state bond funding for large infrastructure ro'ects $ 0-2o years X Maximize Safety,Comfort,and Convenience for Bicyclists and Pedestrians Work with MnDOT to prioritize north- south crossin s $�� o-�o years Evaluate olic for bikin on sidewalks $ 5-�o ears Install wa findin or directional si na e $ 0-5 ears Educate the public on bicycle and edestrian safet � 0-2o years X 34 Monitor crash data that includes bicycle and edestrians � 0-5 years X Install bic cle racks $ 0-5 ears Explore programming that encourages walkin and bikin � 5-�o years Research methods and practices to cost- effectively enhance winter maintenance of $ 5-�o years trails and sidewalks Support and Promote Increased Transit Usage Continue to coordinate with Metro Transit $ O-5 ears X Take an active role in transit studies $ 0-5 ears X Require and build transit-friendly infrastructure in lannin districts �$ 0-5 years Advocate for enhancements to transit sto s � 0-5 years Research circulator system options $ 0-5 years Advocate for additional transit funding from the state le islature � 0-5 years Develop educational material about density and transit $ 5-lo years Integrate Community Values and Character into the Transportation System Assess the condition of existing aesthetic $ O-5 years treatments in the ri ht-of-wa Apply a uniform design scheme in the ri ht-of-wa � 0-5 years X Identify locations appropriate for public art $ O-5 years Work with regional transportation partners to incor orate local desi n schemes � O-5 years X Secure funding partnerships to construct and maintain uni ue ublic infrastructure � 5-�o years Research ways to incorporate racial equity evaluations $ 0-5 years Continue to gather community input $ 0-5 years X Bury existing overhead utilities with projects as resources and opportunities $$$ O-2o years arise 35