The URL can be used to link to this page

02-26-18 PC Agenda AGENDA Planning Commission Regular Meeting Golden Valley City Hall, 7800 Golden Valley Road Council Chambers Monday, February 26, 2018 7 pm 1. Approval of Minutes February 12, 2018, Regular Planning Commission Meeting 2. Informal Public Hearing — Minor Subdivision (Lot Consolidation) — 700 Meadow Lane North — SU07-11 Applicant: North Wirth Associates, LLP (Mortenson) Address: 700 Meadow Lane North Purpose: To combine two existing parcels of land. 3. Informal Public Hearing — Conditional Use Permit (CUP) — 8806 Olson Memorial Highway — Class III Restaurant in the Commercial Zoning District Applicant: Latitude 14 Inc. (Ann Ahmed) Address: 8806 Olson Memorial Highway Purpose: To allow a Class III restaurant in the Commercial Zoning District --Short Recess-- 4. Reports on Meetings of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority, City Council, Board of Zoning Appeals and other Meetings 5. Other Business • Comp Plan Discussion —Water Resources and Economic Competitiveness • Council Liaison Report 6. Adjournment � This docu�T�ent is available in alternate formats upon a 72-hour request. Please c�ll ?63-593-�OOb(TTY: 763-5�3-:396$}tc�make a request. Exarnpies of alternate fc�rniats � �nay incic�de la�ge print,electronic,Braille,aucliocassetfie,etc. Regular Meeting of the Golden Valley Planning Commission February 12, 2018 A special meeting of the Planning Commission was held at the Golden Valley City Hall, Council Conference Room, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota, on Monday, February 12, 2018. Chair Baker called the meeting to order at 7:03 pm. Those present were Planning Commissioners Black, Blum, Brookins, S�gelbaum and Waldhauser. Also present were Planning Manager Jason Zimmerman, Associat� Planner/Grant Writer Emily Goellner and Administrative Assistant Lisa Wittman. Commissioners Blenker and Johnson were absent. 1. Approval of Minutes November 13, 2017, Regular Planning Commission Meeting, Waldhauser referred to the ninth paragraph on page three and asked that words "increase in tax value" be added to the second sentence. MOVED by Segelbaum, seconded by Waldhauser an� m�tion carried unanimously to approve the November 13, 2017, minutes with the above noted correction. November 27, 2017, Special Planning Commission Meeting MOVED by Waldhauser, seconded by;Segelbaum and motion carried unanimously to approve the November 27, 2017, minutes as submitted. December 11, 2017,,Special Planning Commission Meeting MOVED by Waldhauser, �econded by Brookins and motion carried unanimously to approve the Decem�er 11, 2017, minutes as submitted. January 8, 20�8', Special Planning Commission Meeting MOYED by Waldhauser, seconded by Segelbaum and motion carried unanimously to approve the January 8, 2018, minutes as submitted. 2. Informal Public Hearing — Minor Subdivision — 1017 Ravine Trail — SU09-14 Applicant: Tom Hunt & Linda McCracken-Hunt Address: 1017 Ravine Trail Purpose: To reconfigure the existing single family residential lot into two new single family residential lots. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission February 12, 2018 Page 2 Zimmerman referred to a map of the property and explained the applicants request to subdivide the lot at 1017 Ravine Trail into two new lots. The existing single family home would remain and a second lot would be created to accommodate one new single family home. He explained that a subdivision for this lot was approved in 2008, but the plat was not recorded with the County at that time so they are starting the process again. Zimmerman referred to a survey of the property and noted that there are some topography concerns on the east side of the lot with a steep hill that could potentially cause some water issues with the proposed new lot Zimmerman noted that the existing lot is 29,635 square feet in size.Th� lat to the north is proposed to be 17,884 square feet in size and the lot to the south is propased to be 11,770 square feet in size. He added that each proposed new lot will meet all of the requirements of the Subdivision and Zoning Codes and staff is recommending a�proval of the proposed subdivision request. Segelbaum referred to the conditions for approval or denial listed in the staff report and asked if the only way a subdivision can be denied is if these con�litions aren't met. Zimmerman said yes and added that if the conditions are rnet, there is no basis for denial. Baker referred to the survey of the property and asked for further explanation of the concerns about water issues. Zimmerman said there aren't any concerns about the subdivision proposal, staff just wants to make sure that in the future the builder of the new house will understand the conditi�ns they will be working with in order to help direct water from the high slope on the east around the new house. Waldhauser asked if the City routinely'�sks for surveys to be expanded. Zimmerman said it depends on the property and that in this case staff would like to see the topographical information expanded to take the entire slope into consideration and understand how water runs off it. Blum referred to a past subdivision that also abuts the I-394 sound wall where the City asked for additional right-of-way for maintenance. He asked if this proposal is similar to the one they reviewed in th� past. Zimmerman stated that there is enough right-of-way in this case to prvvide#or MnDOT access and maintenance. Segelbaum asked if it would be appropriate to add a condition of approval which states that the subdi�ision:is subject to the comments and requirements in the City Engineer's memo. Zimmerman said yes and agreed that should be added as a condition of approval. Baker referred to a second driveway shown on the survey and asked if there used to be another house on this property. Linda McCracken-Hunt, Applicant, stated that her family has owned the property since 1965. She explained that the original house was a 1947 house and the second driveway used to be the only driveway until they remodeled the property in 1990 and built a new garage and driveway on the north side of the property. She stated the neighbor to the east used to have an in-ground pool which is now a rain Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission February 12, 2018 Page 3 garden and that both they and the npighbors have done some grading work so water run o�f isn't a problem now, but she understands that the owner of the proposed new house will have to take care of the water on their lot. Baker opened the public hearing. Hearing and seeing no one wishing to comment, Baker closed the public hearing. Waldhauser said this is a straightforward request that meets all of the requirements. Segelbaum agreed. M�VED by Waldhauser, seconded by Segelbaum and motion carried ur�animously to recc�mmend approval of the proposed minor subdivision at 1017 Ravine Trail subject to the following conditions 1. The City Attorney will determine if a title review is necessary prior to approval of the Final Pl�t. 2. A park dedication fee of$11,010 shall be paid before release nf the Final Plat. 3. A deferred special assessment of$4,800 shal( be paid befc�r� release of the Final Plat. 4. The City Engineer's memorandum, dated January 11, 2�18, sh�ll become part of this approvaL 3. infArmal Public Hearing —Zoning Code Text Amendment— Mixed Income Housing —ZO00-114 Applicant: City of Golden �lalley Purpose: To consider the addition of Mixed Income Housing language to various secfions of the Zoning Code Goellner stated that the City Council adopted the Mixed Income Housing Policy on S�ptember 19, 2017. She stated that staff intended to make the necessary changes to the Zoning Code as a part of the recodification process but that process has been delayed so stafiF has been directed to make the proposed Zoning Code amendments now. Goellner gav� an overview of the policy and st�ted that it is meant to create more affc�rdable housing in the City and is focused on new projecfs, n�t on existing affordable housing. She stated that certain housing projects of 10 or more units are subject to the requirements in the policy including for-sale condos, townhomes, larg� single family subdivisions, and rental projects with 10 or more units that receive ce:-tain zoning approvals. She noted that there is a distinction made between for-sale �rojects and rental prajects because if the City required that all rental projects be subject to this policy it would be considered rent control which is not allowed by state statute. ' 6aker asked what certain zoning approvals means in regard to rental properties. Goellner stated that a comp plan amendment, a zoning map amendment, a Conditional Use Permit, Minutes of the Golden Valiey Planning Commission February 12, 2018 Page 4 or a PUD are examples of zoning approvals. Baker asked if a rental project with 10 or m�re units were proposed if the City could impose a zoning change to force the policy to be applied. Goellner said no, only a proposal that requires a zoning approval would be subject to the policy. Segelbaum asked what would happen if a condo building were switched to rental housing. Goellner said that would be a very rare occurrence and reiterated that this policy is fiocused on new housing developments. Zimmerman added thaf most housing projects will need planning approvals which will trigger the policy to be applied. Bfum asked about the history of these proposed zoning code text amen�ments. He �sked if there has been guidance from the City Council and if there has been Council consensus that has directed the Planning Commission to consider these text amendments: He said these changes seem to be the most extensive changes since#he subdivision moratorium and that they seem to be happening exceptionally quickly. He'said he thinks'that the comprehensive and extensive nature of these text amendments merits a lot more examination. Baker asked Blum if h� is asking about the g�nesis of the policy or the changes being made to reflect the policy. Segelb�um note� that the policy is already in place. Baker added that the Planning Cammission is just cc�n�id�ring the zoning code text amendments and not the policy itself. Blum said he has been to some of the rneetings where the policy was discussed and he is challenged to find a substantial consEnsus that would make him feel clearly directed on ordinance changes so he would like sorne mc�re information to clearly guide the Planning Commission. Goellner said it was the Council's Qriginal intention that rezonings would be a reason for needing to follow this;policy. She said the key reason is that when a developer wants to change the City's`vision the City wants to see some benefit for changing its vision. She added that the policy is a best`practice that is used in several other cities to make sure there is affordable f�ousing. Zimmerman added that there have been discussions about affordable hausing going on for approximately two years and that the City had a study done on h'ow to keep naturally occurring affordable housing and how to create new affordable housing and that the City Council wants to capture new units that are being constructed and making those affordable. Waldhauser said she believes the intent to include this policy has been there for many years there were just no numbers attached to it. Zimmerman agreed that affordable housing is one of fhe Council's goals and that this policy will put some weight behind it and make it a requirement. Goellner stated that developers can opt into this policy if they choose and they can receive incentives if they opt in such as parking reductions, density bonuses, and fee waivers on a project by project basis. Goellner referred to the affordability requirements and explained that in for-sale projects (condos and townhomes) 10% of the units must be affordable to households earning 80% AMI. For rental projects (apartments) 15% of the units must be affordable to households earning 60% AMI or 10% of the units must be affordable to households earning 50% AMI. She added that the affordability term is at least 20 years from the time fhe building opens. Minutes of th� Golden Valley Planning Commission F�br��ary 1?_, 2018 Page 5 Goellner explained that AMI is the Area Median Income determined by HUD with Census data and that a family of four in the metro area at 100% AMI earns $85,800. A family of four in the metro area at 80% AMI earns $51,480 so a three-bedroom apartment in this pol�cy would cost a family between $1,15�-$1,493 per month rather than $1,930-$2,488 or more: Goellner stated that other features of the policy include: each phase in a multi-phased development must meet the requirements, affordable and market rate units must be�built at same time, the size and design of affordable units must be consistent, camparable, look the same from the exterior, and di�tributed throughout building (not separated}, If a tenant's income increases, they may stay in unit as long as income doesn't exceed 120% AMI, the dev�loper may dedicate existing NOAH units instead of building 'new unit$, and a deve{oper cannot turn away a Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher holder from r�nting solely based on that income source. Goellner stated that the necessary Zoning Code changes incliade adding the words "complianc� with the Mixed-Income Housing Policy" t� each perrnitted and conditiflnal use listed in the R-1, R-2, R-3, and R-4 zoning districts. The CUP section of Code will require cem�,liar�ce with the policy as a factor of evaluatiQn and appro��al, the PUD section o{ Code will require compliance with the policy and wc�uld remt�ve affordable housing from th� amenity points table, and the Administrative section af Co�e wi61 require compliance with the policy for Zoning Map amendments and Comprehensive Plan amendments. Segelbaum said it makes sense that PUDs shouldn't get cred�t #wice for providing affordable units but if a developer�oes �bove an.d beyond that they should get the extra points from the amenity points table. Goellner agreed the affordable housing ameni#y points could stay in the PUD section of Code if the developer goes above and beyond the minim��m requirements of fhe policy. Segelbaum asked how the City is working on preserving existing affordable housing units. Go�;liner stated that there are ten mu.iti-family properties in the City that are charging affordabl� r�nts ranging from $800 to $1,200 per month. These ten properties are at risk of being sold to a new owner and the rents could rise given the current market conditions. She said ihe fiocus has been on these ten prQperties and creating poiicies to help preserve these unit� and keep the rents affordable. Segelbaum asked if these new policies�rrill be added to the Zoning Code. Goellr�er stated that they will likely be policies and not Zoning Code changps because the City has to use incentives, not requirements because ef the r�nt control laws. Brookins asked if restricti�%e covenants will be used to Pnforce the requiremenfi regarding the 20 year affordability term. Gaellner �aid yes. �lum asked if the conversation in its entirety is closed and complete and the Planning Commission has been directed to approve the zaning text amendments, or if it is an on- going conversation and the City is just testing whether or not ti�is is a good time t�o look at what ha� already been discussed. Goellner reiteratAd that the policy has been approved I�/linutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission February 12, 2018 Pac�e 6 by the City Council and they are supportive of adding language to the Zoning Code sup�orting the policy. Baker opened the public hearing. Hearing and seeing no one wishing to comment, Baker closed the public hearing. Blum said he wants to be cautious and consider the entire picture because he is concerned about creating eoncentrations of poverty or ghettos when cities try to cr�ate low income hcusing. Baker stated that the subjecfi of this public hearing is to make a recommendation on the zoning text amendments which implies that th�e`Counc�l has made the decision to do this and the Planning Commission is doing administrative work. Wald'hauser referred to the incentives for developers iisted in the policy where it states that if they are willing to reduce the required parking by 33% or a 10°!o increase in density. Black asked if a larger increase in density could be offered. Waldhauser questioned if the City needs to offer that big of a parking reduction. Goeflner stated that the"reduction is so large in order to offset the high cost to build parking and thrat there are probably limited places where that incentive would work. Baker asked if the sam� incentives are used in other cities. Goellner said yes. B�ker ref�rred to Segelbaum's comment abo�at the PUD amer�ity points regarding affordable housing and said he would like the existing language to remain in the Code. Black asked if an applicant receives 12Q% ofiAMI would they lose their apartment. G�;�11ner said they would have to switch units in order to keep the affordable unit available t� income qualified individuals. Segefbaum stated that there is a' lot of City oversite with this policy and asked if it will be overbearing. Goellner said it is necessary in order to be effective. She noted that the City will hire someone to do the reporting and charge the developer for that work. Segelbaum said he supports these proposed text amendments �and that he is anxious to see what the City comes up with for preserving existing affordable housing. Baker and Waldhauser agreed. Blum said he thinks the proposed text amendments are ap�ro�riate and reasanable. I�+AOVED by Blum, seconded by Segelbaum and motion carrie� unarimously to recc�mmend approval of the proposed Zoning Code text amendments and to keep the PUD amenity points regarding affordable housing in the Zoning Code. --Short Recess-- 4. , R�ports on 1611eetings of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority, City Gouncil, Board of Zoning Appeals and other Meetings Na reports were given. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission February 12, 2018 Page 7 5. Other Business • Comp Plan Discussion — Land Use and Transportation Zimmerman introduced the Land Use plan and summarized the comments he had received to date, including asking for stronger language in some areas and better addressing opportunities for green infrastructure. He discussed the tables showing the anticipated redevelopment areas in 10 year periods and explained that this was a Metropolitan Council requirement that helped them ensure their regional systems were ready to handle new development. Baker commen#ed that this background help�d him betfer understand why these tables were included and asked that sQme text be added to provide this for the casual reader. He also asked staff to addre�s different unit� €�f measurement between the existing and future scenarios. Segelbaum stated that he was looking for more distinction befirreen the n�i�hborhood and community scale mixed-use nodes that were indicated in the plan. Zimmerman pointed to the descriptions of the land uses for some clarification. Baker suggested adding language to help distinguish between the two types. Baker requested a new chart be added to show the amount af change between the land u�es on the existing and future land use maps. ', Waldhauser questioned why the deseriptions of the mixed use sites didn't call for more vertically mixed uses, since thes� projects seemed to be happening elsewhere in the region. She specifically pointed fo the northwest quadrant of Hwy 55 and Douglas Drive, where there could be an oppc�rtunity to build housing over retail or office. Zimmerman pointed out that financing of vertical mixed use projects is difficult and that while the City wants to encourage them, requirir�g them may result it little redevelopment occurring. Blum asked if some of the cabjectives could be modified to better capture topics that he felt nad been di�cussed o�er the past few years. He was thinking of the desire to use site design standards to encourage pedestrian friendly redevelopment in places like the �Iwy 55 West area. �immerman agreed and said that many of those standards would be included in the new mixed use zoning that would be put in place after the new land uses were adopted,'but that he would add language to the objectives to reflect that. Discussing the section on subdivisions, Blum wondered if the language talking about the increase in'new housing through subdivisions was accurate given how much of Golden Valley was developed. Zimmerman pointed out that while most of the city's residential growth would happen in multi-family buildings, that would need to be discussed elsewhere as the Metropolitan Council requires a discussion of subdivision controls in the Comp Plan. He said he would modify the text to reflect this. Qlum also asked about the possibility of expanding the types of fees collected through development in order to create a "green infrastructure fund" that would allow the City to Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission February 12, 2018 Page 8 do more in this area. Baker stated that this would increase costs, but in order to achieve what seems to be priority for residents, fihere would have to be some sacrifices. + Comp Plan Work Session -Transportation Goellner introduced the Transportation plan and noted that positive feedback was received about the sections on Bus Rapid Transit on Hwy 55, green infrastructure, improvements that support the crossing of Hwy 55, investigation of a local circulator, preparing for autonomous vehicles, and traffic calming: She noted that about half of the comrnsnts received so far were in the form of questions, which demonstrates the technical nature of this Chapter and the need for the Communicatians staff to add explanations, reduce jargon, and simplify language. Baker asked about Figure 4.3, which shows future Isvels of congestion, and wondered why there was no impact on Golden Valley Road from the cons#ruction of tf�te light rail station. Goellner replied that the anticipated levels of traffic generated E�y light rail were not expected to negatively impact congestion levels. Baker also commented that Figure 4.4, safety analysis, had a lot of great information on it but was a little hard to read. Referrir�g to the secti�n on new technologies, Baker asked why there were no recommended actions around autonomous vehicles or drones. Goellner replied that there were still too many unknowns, but that staff would`continue to monitor any develo�ments and that MnDOT had many people`working on these topics. Baker also mentioned t�at it felt odd to have a section on telecommunication in the transportation chapter. Goellner replied that this was due to the fact that a lot telecommunication �quipment is or might be located in rights-of-way. Blum suggested looking at a recently adopted ordinance from Chicago to see what was being done around drone regulation. Segelbaum noted that the policy plan should encourage further research and that the City'� long-term goal should be to avoid nuisances associated with this technology. Waldhauser recommended than an emphasis of the plan should be to support transit outside of Golden Valley in order to reduce the impact of traffic that passes through the city on a daily basis. Goellner added that new information about the Infrastructure Renewal Program would be avai;able fater th;is year as the transition from pavement management begins, and that additional ex�lanation could be included in the document. o Cour�cil Liaison Report Council Member Schmidgall stated that Byerlys is having a customer appreciation day to celebrate 50 years in Golden Valley. He also reported that the City Council approved an ordinance to amend the peddler and solicitar rules to state that people campaigning for offic� are not considered to be peddlers or solicitors. Minures of the Golden Vatley Planniny Commission Fe�ru�ry 12, 2018 Page 9 • Planning Articles No discussion took place. 6. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 9:12 pm. Ron Clum, Secretary Lisa Wittm�n, Administrative Assistant ci��y of � Plannin D e artrnent ��l - - � � - 763 593 8095 i 763 593 8109(fax} . �,u�' , �„R� ,�!�., i a� a,�" F��w'�� '�� , .��,��`��,�;��z.;� ,.. _ � , '��.�� _ Date: February 26, 2018 To: Golden Valley Planning Commission From: Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager Subject: Informal Public Hearing on Preliminary Plan for Lot Consolidation of Lots 1 and 4, North Wirth Parkway PUD No. 33—North Wirth Associates, LLP, Applicant Summary of Request North Wirth Associates, LLP, (Mortenson Construction) is proposing to consolidate two of its parcels located at 700 Meadow Lane North and 4050 Olson Memorial Highway. The consolidation would allow the company to construct an enclosed connection between the 700 building and the 4050 building, similar to what was done in 2008 between 700 Meadow Lane North and 4000 Olson Memorial Highway. In order to build across the existing property line, the two lots must be combined and the property line separating them erased. Because the Mortenson site is a Planned Unit Development (PUD), a Minor PUD Amendment for the building addition is also a requirement of this process and will be considered by the City Council in conjunction with the proposed consolidation. It is noted that the applicant sent a mailing to the neighborhood regarding the proposed consolidation. Staff did not receive any comments. Staff Review The proposed two-lot consolidation qualifies as a minor subdivision because the properties located at 700 Meadow Lane North and 4050 Olson Memorial Highway are existing platted lots of record and this action will not create the need for public improvements. The only significant changes resulting from the proposed consolidation would be the possibility to construct the enclosed connection between the two existing buildings, providing a climate controlled environment for Mortenson employees. 1 The applicant has submitted a survey of the existing lots prior to the proposed consolidation, as well as a preliminary plat displaying the new lot after the consolidation. No utility changes are planned as a result of the proposal. An Inflow and Infiltration inspections were conducted on January 29, 2018, and a third inspection is scheduled. Any repairs necessary for compliance will be paid for via a deposit agreement with Mortenson. The Engineering Division has reviewed the application and has provided permitting information and technical comments regarding the plat, utilities, and the future of the existing frontage road adjacent to these two lots (see attached memo). The City is interested in turning maintenance, if not ownership, of the frontage road over to Mortenson now that it is the sole user of the road. Easements would be maintained for existing utilities and for a future signed bike route. The City's Subdivision Code typically requires the payment of a park dedication fee upon platting of property. Staff has been unable to verify that any fee was paid previously, therefore there may be a fee required as a part of this action. Further research will be necessary to determine this prior to consideration by the City Council. Qualification Governing Approval as a Minor Consolidation According to Section 12.50 of the City's Subdivision Regulations, the following are the regulations governing approval of minor consolidations with staff comments related to this request: 1. Minor consolidations shall be denied if the proposed lots do not meet the requirements of the appropriate Zoning District. The new lot resulting from the proposed consolidation meets the requirements of the Business & Professional Offices district. 2. A minor consolidation may be denied if the City Engineer determines that the lots are not buildable. Two buildings have already been constructed and will be connected via an enclosed walkway. 3. A minor consolidation may be denied if there are no sewer and water connections available or if it is determined by the City Engineer that an undue strain will be placed on City utility systems. The consolidation would not place an undue strain on City utility systems. 4. Approval of the minor consolidation may require the granting of certain easements to the City. Engineering staff will work with the applicant to determine the future of the existing frontage road and any land dedication that may be necessary to allow for transportation improvements at the Meadow Lane intersection. These will be shown on the Final Plat. 5. If public agencies other than the City have jurisdiction of the streets adjacent to the minor consolidation,the agencies will be given the opportunities to comment. MnDOT has been contacted regarding this consolidation, but no response has been received to this point. 2 6. The City may ask for review of title if required by the City Attorney for dedication of certain easements. The City Attorney will determine if such a title review is necessary prior to approval of the Final Plat. 7. The minor consolidation may be subject to park dedication requirements. A park dedication fee may be required. Additional research by staff is necessary prior to consideration by the City CounciL 8. The conditions spelled out shall provide the only basis for denial of a minor consolidation. Approval will be granted to any application that meets the established conditions. All conditions have been met. Recommended Action Staff recommends approval of the proposed minor consolidation subject to the following conditions: 1. The City Engineer's memorandum, dated February 21, 2018, shall become part of this approval. 2. The City Attorney will determine if a title review is necessary prior to approval of the Final Plat. 3. If required, a park dedication fee shall be paid before release of the Final Plat. Attachments: Location Map (1 page) Memo from the Engineering Division dated February 21, 2018 (3 pages) Survey and Preliminary Plat (2 pages) 3 $ 1 ��' 8�J � .. .. . _ _. . . � -� .�,�� , . 42�0 4��0 C .. *" Subject Properties � _ �� ; „ 4232 42 48 700 A3 10 426A 4280 4294 650 700 P� . , r..,. � 4210 �#_�� 43 00 4150 4p50 731 SS 529 ' 520 535 4205 536 541 - -- 532 537 501 524 529 `, 528 529 ��; 500 521 520 525 .;: 524 521 - 501 520 521 421 516 517 '� WrrUt 420 505 512 509 '' S12 513 For�ncJ SOfi 508 � 4200 '� 416 Sfl0 500 50Y m,-,� �,< �� ,:Cc,�":>tc:�F.;, � - 4317 4, �09 `�� 24217�13 413541274121 449 420 411 428 425 S 408 421 6 A16 �$ 417 4312 4308 �p 401 �0 401 � 401 ��y �f �� O�Z��Z �VI E N1 C� �i A !V L� U IV� � �C�. �.'� Physical Development Department 763-593-8095/763-593-8109(faxy Date: February 20, 2018 To: Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager From: Jeff Oliver, PE, City Engineer Eric Eckman, Development and Assets Coordinator Subject: Mortenson Minor Subdivision Review Engineering staff has reviewed the plans titled Mortenson Headquarters PUD Amendment, showing the proposed connection of Mortenson's west and south buildings with a two-level walkway link. The west and south buildings are located at 4050 Olson Memorial Highway and 700 Meadow Lane North, respectively, and are part of the larger Mortenson campus. As part of this proposal, a minor subdivision is required to combine the existing parcels in order to facilitate the building connection. The building connection project will be reviewed separately by the City Council as part of the PUD 33 Amendment#4 application. The comments contained in this review apply only to the minor subdivision and are based on the plans submitted to the City on January 29, 2018 and the preliminary plat submitted to the City on February 15, 2018. Existing Conditions The west building is located at 4050 Olson Memorial Highway and is legally described as Lot 4, Block 1 of North Wirth Parkway 2"d Addition PUD No 33.The south building is located at 700 Meadow Lane North and is legally described as Lot 1, Block 1 of North Wirth Parkway 6t"Addition PUD No 33. There are drainage and utility easements varying in width from 20-35 feet along the east, south, and west sides of the parcels. These easements must be retained as part of the new plat. There is an existing frontage road (Olson Memorial Highway North Frontage Road) located immediately south of Mortenson's west and south buildings, north of Highway 55, and east of Meadow Lane.The frontage road is not a through street and serves only the parking and loading functions for the property owner's west and south buildings. The frontage road and the underlying right-of-way were recently turned back to the City by MnDOT. The City is responsible for maintenance of the frontage road, sidewalk, and City utilities G:\Developments-Private\Mortenson PUD 33\Mortenson PUD 33 Amend 4\Memo\Mortenson PUD 33 minor subdivision.docx in this area. Other governmental entities and private companies also own facilities in this corridor. A portion of the right-of-way east of the frontage road was not included in the turn back and therefore remains part of MnDOT's right-of-way. Staff will work with the applicant to ensure that the existing survey and the proposed plat accurately reflect the current ownership and property lines. Preliminary Plat The applicant has submitted a preliminary plat,titled Mortenson Headquarters, showing the proposed combination of two existing parcels (Lot 4, Block 1 of North Wirth Parkway 2"d Addition PUD No 33 and Lot 1, Block 1 of North Wirth Parkway 6th Addition PUD No 33) along with vacated City right-of-way to form one new parcel (Lot 1, Block 1 of Mortenson Headquarters). Prior to submittal, staff met with the applicant to discuss the building connector project and the possibility of the City vacating the frontage road and deeding the property to the applicant as part of the proposal. Staff is supportive of vacating the street and turning over maintenance responsibilities as long as easements are retained for utilities, public sidewalk, and the potential future signed bike route in this corridor. Specific maintenance responsibilities will be outlined in the street vacation document or by separate agreement to guarantee that the public uses are preserved. The west 25 feet of the frontage road right-of-way, abutting Meadow Lane, will not be vacated, but will be retained by the City for transportation purposes. The City will initiate and coordinate the right-of-way vacation process and the process will run concurrent with the final plat approval. The applicant must provide the City with legal descriptions and exhibits for the easement vacation. The proposed final plat must include easements along public streets, property lines, and plat boundaries consistent with the City's Subdivision Ordinance and as outlined above. Staff will work with the applicant to ensure the proposed easements meet these requirements. Consistent with the City's past practice,this plat must include the PUD number in the title. Staff recommends "North Wirth Parkway 7th Addition PUD No 33"for consistency with past plats in this PUD. The proposed subdivision is located adjacent to State Highway 55, and therefore the preliminary plat is subject to the review of the MnDOT. Right-of-Way Dedication During the review of PUD 33 Amendment#3 in 2016, which included a phased buildout of the campus and an increased number of employees and vehicle trips, a traffic study was conducted that identified existing and potential traffic concerns and potential solutions. However, Mortenson did not move forward with construction of the 2016 plan. In the months following, G:\Developments-Private\Mortenson PUD 33\Mortenson PUD 33 Amend 4\Memo\Mortenson PUD 33 minor subdivision.docx staff met with Mortenson to discuss their current and future campus plans, traffic concerns, and potential solutions, including the construction of public improvements. Although no increase in the number of employees and vehicle trips is anticipated as part of the minor subdivision for the proposed building connector project, Mortenson agreed to participate in an expanded traffic study of the North Wirth area as their campus plans evolve. In order to facilitate potential solutions to the traffic concerns, staff recommends that the applicant dedicate the west 25 feet of Lot 4, Block 1 of North Wirth Parkway 2"d Addition PUD No 33 along Meadow Lane for right-of- way purposes as part of this subdivision. Staff will continue to work with the applicant and further discuss this matter before consideration of final plat approval. Park Dedication Fees Staff recommends that the applicant pay park dedication fees for the land included within this minor subdivision, if it was not paid as part of previous platting. Summarv and Recommendations Engineering staff recommends approval of the Mortenson minor subdivision subject to the comments contained in this review. Approval is also subject to the review and comments of the City Attorney, other City staff, and other governmental entities such as MnDOT. Please feel free to call me or Eric Eckman if you have any questions regarding this matter. C: Tim Cruikshank, City Manager Marc Nevinski, Physical Development Director Emily Goellner, Associate Planner John Crelly, Fire Chief Joe Kauth, Building Official Tim Kieffer, Public Works Maintenance Manager Joe Hansen, Utilities Supervisor RJ Kakach, Assistant City Engineer G:\Developments-Private\Mortenson PUD 33\Mortenson PUD 33 Amend 4\Memo\Mortenson PUD 33 minor subdivision.docx �,dfi = r V J ��z _ �=Y�� ..-�-.J '�, --' q� � z;�� m� � � _ z i�- � � e g` � A. i� � ' � +� � z�� _ - ; '�. '� �� 2 5 � � .� • � � � <� z , -- _ �� . �-5 �„'c�� r A � O y-z = 9°�`c s Z �r s' !�� j�- 1 � o� Z '� 1fK � �- - ' � Y�. ��,w ��.,.,.. ...k# .,.. �. � � . �. . � - -_ �. �� .,d 5 c,� - . . �'�... � , ... x � 3 i��II�IIuIN� G =� �IIIIII�� U 3¢ > F w U F U O �4.. l. j � � � a � � U � N m W m Q s K K U (� m � �'j w U Z Z Z Z Z Z � ~ r �< �-; x� . � Z � w O O O O O Q y U � N O O "' - � �c E ¢ � u � U � 3 4 � � tt � � o pz w ^ E a � F � r � w w w p � Z Z U U � � LL O Nj Z U z i` C � p - W - W � O p Q Z Z j Z Z o U �n v� 3 u� 3 � � � z z w � � o o aa o F o F ¢ > Z = _ ° _ � � � � � � � � � � � (Q{}} � ° -> F ' a � U o u V � � Z F - � � C " 3 v I I I I I I I I I I � m ~ � > O a =_°c a � _ ° � c > ' Z � N �i _ � 9 ; �' w � C ',"�. ` 3 _ ' _ - ` � C� Q w J N 3 _ _ - a a J w o � c� � _ ` _ _ c s � o i w � y a � a 3 - � r,, >- a � i i � 3 � x �>a � ' = W o � w Q E a w < � w � � a o� � ' ' `u s o 3 � � a - � � � � 'r' � � - � a � o � Q z 3 =-' `o_ - o n, .v"_ .�. � � � � o � � ,��, � � � � `'c:� v " ,= � (n w � w � w � w u i c� a � g a U v��i i a C ,� ; 3 =c a � W 1 Z = _ _ B � 9 9 O � 9 9 � a p o 6 {� a �O -r°C = 8 a 3 i - ' ¢ - .�;�j_ -�c _ � `. � - �.�F,"' jQ _ a � O w N O � ��e'a� Z> ? � _ N � O p O p � �F��, �'Z 3 t^L � � � I W Q W F Y lal � r '� .-... F'�n p O m � r � Q a o � � �'J' _ � c� o a � � L �� - �c oc - � � � � � � 3 W � w � w 5 � - ��m ° � a � _ - Q o - Q = Q a � � � � o � m w w � W a � _ _ _ >.c o � v � _ �n u� 3 c� > c> ¢ cai w G U � O a in r r - ��" ' _ o in J � � 3 - m�� v. � a = _ ��O � o $ e � � y h � � a a n w � V �cv4 �� N - V � o a N a g S� , � U V . � � � :.� M � � .� n r 3 e r a 3 a o o M `' 3 d �'� d o 3 0 0 o a e I I _ e�wmws-'a� � �^ Ip � . . .... ...... � �� Q � .,. . � �_ g� � >n 3v � � �I�y�Ji �i� � �� — I I I I -I � ' I--�{ _ _ � \ . . ...,.� . . . . ..... I� � I— �� °�p s ¢'`�w i ' o ' $ �-�€ '.cas,.si�'rr �� ,r. �d�• f�-5>— ....�-� G >-c � �y�-��..ma3vamn.m---� �e a..n� 0 . + > _ _ , �.. . n.n.:. '� � ��, m . . ---��- - - -- - ... - - gg -1- �--- &. . . , o� +-�- - zi �0 � e�s .:�>. 6rg'E; � .. -»- Iv.an)-> -� » a a I �I -- - I' ' £ ��c,°6�se�, � ,�$ m,�'�� €..� � �� tl d'�..0 � I � � o ^� - � � ��F�� d e " F ' F : I � ��I � � I� � a d � a:o��.� �1 �.o � � � _I � � swmine Aaois-r n::$ ��-y�>.'� � e8 ' e H,� ��Y� I �� I � - �� ..'�.. i�$ I . 'I �`d ' ... B�' �� qE �o . � i � FI� h ,� I ��:V, � (�a) p.,pt� � o�ry�fs �� R � , � � � - ere I I � �.h_' rse � � e ,�. �s �' � ��a 'A -0 � � � g I - I �m � � 5 "<:P � °� �, ". �� 0 H° os� I ^� i I � ,�,o� �� v4 ��. � ��D o�,� � .�� .��i d^� I � N r . .;�:. .. ' •:;$6 g� ...... , ...�-, • . ;". . .'_ �. '�* ` � .. I - �� _ � •.�..n.. .. � � �g g P �• F C4 .r�. �61s ��8� �� E a I I I �� .- �. b �. � � b � � b ' .: 9 w . � � � � sre . � �' ?B � ' g 817 �I � 8 gp Y`z d� � � � ... � ��0 . 8R��x � _ z � I I �$ — �r' • `.�° �'� ,I e� s� a: I .� � m ':.❑� I - I ��wr; r �'�p,� � e �° �;..� `�4'sa+ mn.e I� - "� - � dr �: � €'r• P ea Ig¢ -eas �e a �e �. � .Nq a�. �� _ � � — � � '>.� . �.e.. r `y�'"�i'��/�u�\�. �[ �� • � Y � � • �� '>n,�. ,O I p � B � m+.a �__ � F'6 � .. � _ ... . ^ .. ...`. . ;• � — » �z s � � `�0 0 �� T� � '� � � ' , �� o� —� � � ^ ' ` �� .� I �'. ID�a, �-'-�- � � € fi �� t �` � Q"3'� °'�., - �.�'�:: € .�:`r"e"3- i`�`aa�F ..� � K 1 .` � e� � r ��: ' � � � �el��.�� -I- 4� �� 2 — —— -� rre °a � -�� .�: ��., � � '`� _ �, 8�� ]� � xn ia � ° ' �� P - �; � ,�' : .' ;. ; <�3 _ # I ., ;� i: ; �ii� �: � ' . 4 � � (�:vAe�) B�p . ��` � �� I •C eue7 eBpu�fuuns �m.a, s .I`f /.` ��/ �.` l f:! / � � �;� i �$ I .00 ��.o, ' • • ' _ � I �� 7 i � _ _ — —— � - .. I'. � I• lvK9 y�f1� rR� � M .�r _ _ _ I` � I �•�Ip �T � ��'� �� o�� j I�.ir .. bUr�.+ � � , ' ` � I B I 1 : _ k ; � � I� � �,•�,;',;N�� ,� h� : 3 � � � � � J I � �' i� p � �., a i � I 'C � 3 � � `� � � i �`� _ I � �. °� `� �� .`� �� ; `� �.' .�: " g Yi ' . �—m �m ' I R�� b '� c�.a� � I� � � � � ry I ��I I ^ ^ a�^� �s � � p I E . �� b p. �` I ��Y�`-� � I ��p � #� p —�x - � V "R� � � � f' � -- ,� � O �� ' � �'�-�'��, O BR� �JI A B�I£ ~e�' =II ,a.��' � I � � /// ,9 � - a � I�\ 3 __ a�� 6Yq ...y1V ��,I // / �`'� OI8�I � o9i •.. ��Y .p � � � � � �� 1 � � \ � - � � e„p8 ,,� / � sb I � �� i,ys�� n �� . — af � � j q$ZR ^� �1 S I � _ \\ � R � - � ��7�\ �a . � � Y . . --. . . � - �. I p ��}� � V a�I � , �� .� �' � � '�� _ _ _ _____ -_-_1- s/J�' p^I I ��I �� - " �',. ; •�� 'eie A_ .��.a� � Y-'� � -- '� �-- -_�-� °`i A sre I � j � o � � � esi� : ,'zre �;: � '—;— ' � ��muuo�� ' ��N a �— - —�� y� e5Y g . , l I `., I ,� ore �re 1 �' t� - ., � ,�h \I ' � ' ;.:�.��..�. ......ts.a.�7. . �...., .. ; . . . �.... .. . ,. 2 ly, s"' � ro I J `. -c< e � � � \ � ' , . �' ' I �/�,� s _ — > ��.a, > s; _ _ > _ > _ ��.a, > > � /�°� � � ��.,, � , � � 0�� '� � '� � ��..� � � — �� // /J`,�0��%� - - - - --- _ __ _ _ _ _ ,_ � � Naue7Mopea`y ° � ' � � / ♦ � e - `�sa_ _ I - � �� / � � �� — - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -, �� %r -� i I � ?IIItiV4\ ��ICA:I�11115\I� fl(I\'.)\��s:.�l�lt1��.Y\ 1�14�:: `JIt1Z/11/tif�.[��tt��l,l F D i; � oE�Em E I E �m U = UE I o � � _ � = m$o � � "; O rz��8� i = - � �� u o __ � � 0�3� �IF � ■ Z _ Em al Y �I � �-YT.' - I _ O � - �3 � _ 'z;J d " a � ` "o'o= o o i�;r - U o Z'�v �0 3 m� �0 ��o TY- um I _ '��°o rv- _ 2�_ z E� v `oQw� - - � ��o`m_ �- . �-rvn Z� ' ' ° � U"YV- I I W I v x A -� � o n�v � f i _ 3 p�t� L° 2� 2, q�_ �; I >'u � ` = Z�r o y E A n ; a 3 Z c d = �3 r _ �D.. poy3m z° �I '� �' .2 E� � �' � .E; ; Q�__ _ Z .E T Z E U T ?.e o V V - _ E E E _a'C �I U N _ � �� E W w c a - �U 0 u �'A m d Y - - - v �� c Q E m `a n � � F 6 � E`- z' .o u F - .�i � U ¢�'3° o, d � .E o �� o� _ � `" 9 E'� a�E a 3 __ O = Z _ �L' 2 .E .di o v � � 0 i`_� O = - _ � ¢`w � v � `m �-�v.E� Z "u - ` „ a E ¢ r'� zp E Z r Z c c a q � a� '� �` O �2� - O _ - � � t t :' m � o Y' � p � - � � ��' �I V w ZU Q p - _ _ � 3-"'0 -- _ 2 p � < Z _ I ¢ Z E m � - _ O O z v S� c a' c "3 m � N « c o A o EI E°1 �n E � _ Z _ EI w L` �c G � ¢ `Y q o � ? � � A A� `o E y� w°o Z � � n � � � a w� Y z Y �� r d o � ��N Z � � f w `o o � o � O o a � u c E a 'a m U a � U m V V d-' � G �' t u � �� m Z - 2 Y -ae` Z >,E« ¢ 09� - D _ F r r ., m � G c a - yi � � V 2` � _ � � o � -n iE uS m > n c v 2 O o � � 3 ; r w ;m � w �� vEd ; N zoo � a u° - r x a x " z a Q ¢ Q a =� Q z Z p� o _ 3 �� z � z � «EP E _ O o �- - O O � y Y AE �z p Z A f F�`m� � � s F a vi _ °q � � a3"� ° i z «e v a z ;r � s. �0I �� z= Y � pi`o 0 o i s � i � i � w '� -a;c y` F Z c v o Z � „ N c?a - d Z c �s_ 2 S `-a � � ,2, E C/, J; J � J F m��Nv.. v � �� 'a d c rc �� Eq, 6 O • J � � E a � __ z a " " p � ' � v � a� Ow� g w0� w �2��0 v, o O� z O Z U w � F /�� 3a � � � u z q � . � � � � - z ° o " ° Y � oo Z 9 x ; o v ~ O rn - ~ ; � ._. �O �p - V N �S_ ~ % � � � � O1� O r-£ � m z _ � m � n n m a _ Y m a ¢ z in V �^z �n u '!'z p �� v,t) �^z l� n�3 v � N u � W �� i � $� '-___ luvu.viwM w�llsa�.(lup�udcw.aN ``__ �• \� L9'OLS NL/a$ dZ'N'6Z!�6['�S/�4/l3N aVl lo��.7 35-.\", � S6ZLOZ �` � 3,00,OO.ON ' --fC'ON Ofld NOLLqOY ONL AtlMNlIYd HLtlIN HitlON `i��' �� I \ �� ,��W NLOCSffI'oN'wdn 7wwxo3Q!Hfl--� � � J R e R li 1, I^'�� ,:�v� - � i � --�------------------------L------- ------------------ � �` � �a� ,r� o , _ _�a I 8 �� I �� O �5 rs�eel �� .`_ iy�os I N '�� 1 � �� I � � w�o . , �� 18181 a�o � I o � W =p g �_ � ,_� r � s� � i i ,� � � �� r-5;�; ,`, .` _, .� � - i � s : z� ` �� " .. --- i � W � Z = -- � , = ., � i J O � � -s- � Y �. -"- � i � �� , _ ... � _ Z �� .; � , W .��riz „��N � - _. � ;,� o � •-- � 2`�-�, _ ` '` � � � I .s �� _- ��y p i � �%� - O \ , � $ : � � :�- - - - � � � - � � �� i €i� !' � �:° ,;'. .; _, _ __I ' i � � , � i •-- :, � o � � � � � � - � , , m � � � � � � t' � i � � � � . �� i � � � . , i I - , I � - �' � ,, �� -- i �; �;: I ` '_' N � .' I � .�� I _ � � I . __ I '" \� ' I ;, I -_ � `- � � :�, � � � .. �� ; � ;. �, � �� .. � oz I , . � � -. � . ._. � _. � ,, � F ��J __ z , . a m ,; _,- m m �. .>- "` �� LL o ,; ,�� ..o °d � m� i �eb gz z .; ' o� // '" .. w.�M1O� 4� p ' I �' a g /� � �va0.�' �z ? _ I „ / j �P' °o � � o s / .y/B' . o 0 \ � $� � /�3 m� E 6�0 wH . \ � I o9�0 a� O i��,� gf �Q4 S z a w I \ .� %1 � I 0 s _F O I � � �� I I . � � 1-i--J��'�- � �� o W.J • �\ ' i q��i . .�o y; 9A � I � � _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - T - - - IOVi/`3,OZ,6l.ON a ry1� � w � — T - - - - - - - II LL � \��t�oi�o eu�M R u R i �— + - �-- - III IIIZIINIII o Z I P'.�il � i i IIIIIIIII /� - - - - - L-- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - �- - - - -,-,-Y,- - - - - - - - - � � / � � � � ., _, ., , . ., , , .. , . ., , _� , ., .. : ., „ _, .. -, , , � ., � �� '� N;<y , Physical Dev��.+�prne�t �e�artrnen�t ��-s�►�-s��-��s-s�c�� Date: February 26, 2018 To: Golden Valley Planning Commission From: Emily Goellner, Associate Planner/Grant Writer Subject: Informal Public Hearing—Conditional Use Permit (CUP-160)to Allow a Class III Restaurant at 8806 Olson Memorial Highway— Latitude 14, Inc., Applicant Proposed Use Latitude 14, Inc., represented by Ann &Tarique Ahmed, are proposing a new restaurant at 8806 Olson Memorial Highway. They have applied for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP)to allow for a Class III Restaurant. A Class III Restaurant is defined as "any type of night club, tavern, restaurant or other facility providing entertainment, food and/or beverage that provides sit-down service but may also provide standup bar service and standup tables within the premises." This would replace the existing Perkins Restaurant, which is considered a Class I Restaurant. A Class I Restaurant is defined as "any traditional type restaurant where food is served to a customer and consumed while seated at a counter or table, including cafeterias where food is selected by a customer while going through a service line and taken to a table for consumption." Class I Restaurants are permitted in the Commercial Zoning District, so a CUP was not required for Perkins. Location This property is zoned Commercial and guided for Commercial use in the Comprehensive Plan. It is surrounded by Commercial zoned properties to the east and west. Properties to the north are zoned for Light Industrial use. The lot is 48,654 square feet in size. The applicants intend on utilizing the existing building, which is 4,713 square feet in size. They are planning to add a 500 square foot outdoor patio space to the west side of the building. This will require the closure of the existing fire lane. The Deputy Fire Chief has provided a memo recommending approval of this change. Hours of Operation The proposed hours of operation for the Latitude 14 restaurant are 11 am to 10 pm on Sunday through Thursday and 11 am to 11 pm on Friday and Saturday. This is standard for restaurants in the City. Perkins Restaurant is open 6 am to 12 am, 7 days a week. Employees & Customers The applicant expects to employ 40 people at this site. They estimate an average of 350 visitors per day. Parking The site currently has a parking lot containing 71 spaces, but code requires 94 spaces for this proposal. Based on the proposed layout, the applicant would need: 4,438 sq. ft. dining room space @ 1 space per 60 sq. ft. 74 500 sq. ft patio dining space @ 1 space per 60 sq. ft. 9 272 sq. ft. bar area @ 1 space per 25 sq. ft. 11 94 spaces required 71 spaces existing 74 spaces proposed The existing parking lot has 71 spaces. The Perkins restaurant received variances in the early 1990s to build the parking lot into the front setbacks on the north and south sides of the property. The applicant is proposing to remove the flag pole in the parking lot make room for an additional handicapped-accessible space. They are also planning on moving the trash enclosure to make room for 3 additional spaces, bringing the proposed parking count to 74 spaces. This requires a variance to the minimum parking requirement. In the attached letter dated February 20, 2018, the applicant provides an explanation for this parking proposal. The plans that they originally submitted on January 25, 2018, included a much larger patio, larger bar area, more seating, and the removal of 11 parking spaces on the south side of the building. The applicant inquired with Red Lobster at 8900 Golden Valley Road and TruStone Financial at 605 Boone Avenue, but these property owners were not interested in entering into a shared parking agreement. Therefore, the applicant has decided to apply for a variance to the City Code, which will be reviewed by the Board of Zoning Appeals on March 27, 2018. The applicant is requesting a variance of 20 parking spaces off the required 94 spaces to a total of 74 spaces. Staff has evaluated the parking plan and agrees that there is validity in several points of the applicant's assessment. The assessment is provided in the attached letter dated February 20, 2018. The points from the letter include: • Outdoor seating will be used for approximately 4 months out of the year. The applicant expects that it will be rare that the entire restaurant (indoor and outdoor seating) is fully occupied at any given time. The Metropolitan Council calculates sewer and water access charges (SAC and WAC) for outdoor patios at a lower ratio than regular indoor seating, which provides some precedence for the City. • The City of St. Louis Park, Minnetonka, and Edina do not count outdoor patio seating in the parking calculation, so the applicant is requesting that Golden Valley consider a similar exception. It is true that the City has very few restaurants with outdoor patios, all of which were approved in Planned Unit Developments (PUDs) and variances did not need to be considered. • It is very difficult to meet the parking requirement while revitalizing this existing restaurant into a new restaurant with a liquor license. The applicant notes that this is because the bar area of the restaurant requires a higher parking ratio,the existing restaurant does not currently include an outdoor patio, and there is not any space to expand the parking lot. • The existing seat count at Perkins Restaurant is 164. With 71 parking spaces, the City has not received any complaints of parking shortages. The proposed seat count for the new restaurant is 144 including the outdoor seating. Staff has concluded that 1 parking space for every 1.94 seats in the restaurant will be sufficient. Planning staff intends on reviewing all off-street parking requirements in 2019, including a methodology for calculating outdoor seating, as an implementation step to the Comprehensive Plan update process. A reassessment of these regulations has not be completed in many years. Before recommending approval of this plan, staff is interested in understanding the Planning Commission's assessment of the parking plan and variance request. Bicycle Parking The City Code requires that this property contain 5 bicycle parking spaces, which is 5% of the required 94 car parking spaces. The applicant has included 10 bicycle parking spaces on the plan. Engineering Staff Review Engineering staff has reviewed the proposal and there are no outstanding issues or corrections that must be addressed. Staff has provided the applicant with notes on the various permits that must be obtained as well as other general notes on the development process, which are detailed in an attached email. Neighborhood Mailing A mailing was sent to property owners within 500 feet of this site by the applicant on February 2, 2018. The City received questions from TruStone Financial Federal Credit Union (605 Boone Avenue) about signage and landscaping. The applicant has addressed their questions and staff is not aware of any further concerns from neighboring property owners at this time. Liquor License As a proposed Class III Restaurant serving alcohol, the applicant must apply for a Liquor License. That process remains separate from the CUP approval process. The Liquor License will also address hours of operation, noise violations,type of alcohol served, and the required food-to liquor-sales ratio. Liquor License applications are reviewed and approved by the City Council and administered by the City Clerk. Snow Removal Staff has instructed the applicant to include a plan for the removal or storage of snow on the property prior to the issuance of the building permit. Evaluation The findings and recommendations for a Conditional Use Permit are based upon any or all of the following factors: 1. Demonstrated Need for the Proposed Use: Based on the success of other restaurants in the community, there is evidence that the proposed Class III Restaurant use is appropriate. 2. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan: Class III Restaurants are consistent with the Retail/Service designation of this property on the General Land Use Plan Map. 3. Effect on Property Values: Renovations to the building on the subject property may have a positive impact on its own estimated value, but staff does not anticipate that the new use would have a positive or negative impact on the surrounding property values. 4. Effect on Traffic: The number of trips generated by the proposed restaurant are minimal. The current restaurant generate a very comparable amount of traffic to the site, which do not cause any negative impacts to the area. Staff does not expect any negative traffic impacts to the surrounding areas resulting conversion from a Class I Restaurant to a Class III Restaurant. 5. Effect of Increases in Population and Density:The proposed use may generate a minimal increase in the number of employees at the location, but the number of employees will be limited based on the size of the building. The potential for a minimal increase in the number of employees on site does not threaten the health, safety, and welfare of the community. 6. Increase in Noise Levels: The proposed use is not anticipated to cause a significant increase in noise levels. The majority of activities associated with the proposed uses will occur within the interior of the building, thereby reducing the impact to the surroundings. The outdoor patio dining space is relatively small and is immediately adjacent to other businesses that generate similar noise levels. 7. Impact of Dust, Odor, or Vibration:The proposed use is not anticipated to cause an increase in dust, odor, or vibrations. 8. Impact of Pests:The proposed use is not anticipated to attract pests. 9. Visual Impact: With the interior and exterior remodeling, staff anticipates an improvement in the visual quality of the property. The applicant must abide by all regulations regarding fencing, screening, outdoor lighting, and outdoor storage, as stated in the Golden Valley City Code. 10. Other Impacts to the City and Residents: Staff finds that the parking plan submitted on February 20, 2018 will be sufficient for the proposed restaurant, but a variance to the City Code must be approved by the Board of Zoning Appeals in order for this Conditional Use Permit approval to be valid. Therefore, staff is recommending approval of CUP 160 only if a variance for 20 parking spaces is received. If additional interior dining space, bar area, or outdoor patio space is added in the future, a Conditional Use Permit Amendment must first be approved by the City. Staff does not anticipate any other negative effects of the proposed use. Recommended Action Staff recommends that the Planning Commission continue the public hearing to April 9, 2018 for Conditional Use Permit 160 allowing a Class III Restaurant at 8806 Olson Memorial Highway. This allows adequate time for the Board of Zoning Appeals for review the variance application at their next meeting on March 27, 2018. If approval is recommended by the Planning Commission, staff recommends that the approval of the Conditional Use Permit be subject to the following conditions: 1. The plans by submitted by Shea Design on February 20, 2018, shall become a part of this approval. 2. A variance of 20 spaces off the required 94 spaces to a total of 74 spaces must be approved by the Board of Zoning Appeals. In the event that complaints to the City regarding parking are deemed to be significant by the City Manager or his/her designee, the City reserves the right to require modifications to the days or hours of operation or the use of a shared parking agreement with adjacent property owner(s) in order to address parking concerns. 3. A Conditional Use Permit Amendment must first be approved by the City in order to expand interior dining space, bar area, or outdoor patio space in the future. 4. Hours of operation for the restaurant are limited to 11 am to 10 pm on Sunday through Thursday and 11 am to 11 pm on Friday and Saturday, unless otherwise further limited by an approved City Liquor License. 5. This approval is subject to all other state, federal, and local ordinances, regulations, or laws with authority over this development. Attachments Location Map (1 page) Applicant's Narrative dated January 23, 2018 (2 pages) Plans submitted by Shea Design on January 25, 2018 (2 pages) Letter from Applicant dated February 20, 2018 (2 pages) Plans submitted by Shea Design on February 20, 2018 (2 pages) Memo from Ted Massicotte, Fire Department, dated February 22, 2018 (1 page) Email from Eric Eckman, Engineering Division, dated February 21, 2018 (1 page) T Z > -� --, 9105 820 825 a z a � < o f�7 G � 800 83 5 U 7'u 750 a 8350 83 00 730 745 8400 8300 730 8401 63 Subject Property:8806 �to e;":{ es°, �,�Bo�ne :t,.,, Olson Memorial Highway �'��id u mg 8800 'i'I�Av[-N 240 9140 8525 8845 8900 605 600 9200 9050 9000 8606 270 9110 9710 600 Goltlen Vailey RU 9201 91009010 8950 8815 53 �9 �.- 440 424 6957 8945 .. 4'i 3 9131 9037 �3 - �2 8877 . 024 423 - �4 &rt,, : 9141 421 ' �� , r A16 91419131A 347 _ 410 89288920 8912 415 408 � 345 u :':,r.�... ,/�/(��i13189143 339 89338925891789138909 �0 ��w�9131C 325 88458635 � 913 iD 9145 r 10 South Eighth Street t 612_339_2257 Minneapolis MN 55402 sheadesign.com RECEIVELI January 23, 2018 CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY �Wiv 2 5 �Q18 Emily Goellner City of Golden Valley Inspections Dept 7800 Golden Valley Rd. Golden Valley, MN 55427 Re: Remodel of the existing Perkins restaurant off of Hwy 55 and 169 Shea Project No.: 7833.00 Dear Emily, Please consider this the narrative that is required as part of our Conditional Use Permit Appiication. Our responses to the 10 factors of evaluation: 1. Demonstrated need for the proposed use. a. We are a Class III type of restaurant that will be serving food and alcohol. 2. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan of the City. a. The Comprehensive Plan of the City notes that our lot should be Retail/Service,which we believe a restaurant use falls under. 3. Effect upon property values in the neighboring area. a. We believe the property values would be the same if not bettered by us putting in a new, nice restaurant with an award winning chef that has already proven successful in its existing Brooklyn Park location. 4. Effect of any anticipated traffic generation upon the current traffic flor and congestion in the area. a. We do not anticipate any change in the amount of traffic The Perkins has normal restaurant traffic and we anticipate the same with our new restaurant. 5. Effect of any increases in population and density upon surrounding land uses. a We do not anticipate any affect in population density 6. Increase in noise levels to be caused by the proposed use. a. We will have an exterior patio, so there will be a little more activity outside than there currently is, but this is not a noisy restaurant that should be causing noise complaints from any neighboring business owners or residents. 7. Any odors,dust, smoke,gas,or vibration to be caused by the proposed use. a. There will be some minor restaurant odors, but it should not be any more than the current Perkins or any other restaurant would have. 8. Any increase in flies, rats,or other animals or vermin in the area to be caused by the proposed use. a. No,there should not be any increase in flies, rats or other animals or vermin.Trash will be controlled and tidy and maintained in the existing dumpster enclosure. 9. Visual appearance of any proposed structure or use. a. We are planning on painting the outside of the building and roof a dark gray color,which is very popular these days and have nice wood accents at the patio,entrance and above the windows, It will be a nice upgrade in design from what is currently there with the existing Perkins. 10. Any other effect upon the general public health,safety,and welfare of the City and its residents. a. No, there should be no additional concerns on this topic. The only proposed use of the property is Restaurant(Assembly).The existing building is 4,713 sf and we are planning on adding a seasonal, uncovered patio that is just under 2,000 sf.There is also an indication on our plan for a potential future shed that might be placed next to the patio for storage of the patio furniture in the winter,but that would be pretty more of an off the shelf item from one of the local hardware stores(nice looking though so it does not detract from the design of the building).The anticipated number of employees is 40 people.The anticipated number of potential customers or R:\7800-7899\7833.00 LAT 14-NEW RESTAURANT CONCEPTIPROJECT MGMTlnarrative for the planning dept Ot-23-18.docx � k,f visitors is on average 350 per day,and our hours of operation will be Sunday-Thursday 11 am-10pm and Friday-Saturday 11 am-11 pm. Please let us know if you have any further questions or concerns. Sincerely, Erica Freeman, Project Architect Shea, Inc. R:17800-7899V833.00 LAT 14-NEW RESTAURANT CONCEPT�PROJECT MGMllnarretive for the planning dept Ot-23-18.docx r � � � � � Z � _ '� � � � w� O� �Z � > O > 'Y�-y � � e � m � �� = j � � � �� LL � � N Q,g� a i Cl: w � .� Lz °c�� C.7 � �uo ^ � � � M E aZa o � _ o � T� �7�' � y N N � ~N> Q Z rn�a� W-�Z � (_}O � � �_ .. � m c4i '_ oC O wQ n6 ��r Cn� o 0 1 1 a' c � �I� ii wa�o0 Z p O y m � �� v � � .. � �2' Z ao C7 � ¢ 3 Z �a' 9 v� � \ N N '�nd H1L � � � � - __, O � � �V ,��;�.>� � � v� �n � :� w J J � � \�� _ �J m m � y:` � Cn Cn � � �: �� CI� W W w U U 7 � U U U � J UQ Q Q N C�'� � -- a �� C/� C!) U f� W W "' � � Q a � -_— Z Q � � � � � v� v� � � � � �.� � � � ti � ` _ ,� N � � � '�, Q , co .- ,, �� , � J , , ,., � r N Lf� .� � � ,: � /l�\ � �� / .. ;!/ T�\ �� j� �� ; �`�\ i% �Y � � \ \ � \�' `_ I, � ��?� �,, � >��"\\, Z ^\� �\\�^�',H"� .. � _.._\ \~;.. �, I ,^ , „ � •. . V J � \ // `11 l �� h��? �.��c LL �� 1 U l , \ �% ` � LJJ � v ;/ �\ -�'` cn U � � � .�. � � r � `��, � �� w w cn � U U �n � , �� , . c� , � -'� . o � . ° -- �� .� � i�, ��, o .� � � � ► . ,; : � .`� � II � � � `\ � � � T T �_ �' � � �• ,� � U � N � � O -� \ %�� ° J � c� u- p cr� , \ � -- � � ' �� Q �nr� � c� ww _ � � U N ,� � � � � � � p '"� C'� � z C� c°�n � � �.�:�� . �� z � 1- w o ,,, � � � � C� w � z � �- �` � � z v� �. -� Q � � cn o� o � ��,,, � �'�_, � � � , � z � �— � � � � � �� m � wo s�.., ;� � a; � u � � � -; � es � � �� ```, rr`�T ..��,�� z -,r.�;._ - �'��' �`-_� � � � � I O ,, � �� v � f � ` l �;\\\ ;�" �� ,� � ��,. � � � � �, , �:,, �.. '� � - _ � �� f� � ---��' � � - -� - - - � � �� Z - q . ' Z `� � :� � � � �� - � � � � � �� . - � --_ � o �w __..". V/ T V I � r _... Q W � � � `GH�P.� 55 � N � �o�,��o�=��o..��,eso�e��,��,.«e�.,�n��o��„d ,�,�,�9a,��„,.�3 �. >- � w � Zo R _ "L,} J � w � O'" PU acz � > 0a �} � � o � OV � d oe ~�� x u'.�:. � F- � O � � w '`� oZac�� % � W � wo - ^ ' N � � � � a=a � �� o �� o� _ � � s � � � N N> a (Y _a � z oc � L �o ��°'� �' `u�o w ~ � •� (ry� o a' /� � � m � - � o �u r n cn o � N c t��c�� °� � �p J Z 3"' 111� � � � � `� � � wop0 Z Q O € � J o � .- .� m s Z oo C7 � Q d Z �€n o LL � O � ` ,,.� .. .��.. � . J T J °° � � � � � � � OU 7 � : ,,.,,� � w t Q a �C Y U w w � � � ��O °I c�w r �— � c� O r o ��I� wl� cn z � U � � � 0 � , Q w : Z W O �nQw p ° o Z U z � �', P- wl� ' ¢ � J � � � �I Z �O �I � � � � mlO � Z � � � � � � ° � �I--� 1 w C'� Q �r w�. I I � � � � J � / , � �� LJ �� `J ~ — — _ , °: �' .-j �� a � � L — J �,. Z .��`' � � m . .y/ � .....J ��' Z R ; J�, _ � LL � � �� ...X w O. Cn 0 � � � � !� — � 1 � W /\ °� � r — �I� o W � � Y I � � — i_ J i � J -... �^, ;-� o _ r( � � LL � � � u' _ �,.: o I 1 p '=� Q �-�-- �---�-� I r'-- `--Z--�� w � �� , � I � .. �. w 'C� ■ � cn � � I v 1— a cn O I � � �� 8 w I � o �� i�. ' w__� � � � ~ �I I L�� J� w I L�� I I > J ( "J � O w� � _ _ _ _ _ — — LL W —� g� I II � amm � Z 0 � �Q � ��" � I I �� — — � Q � �� ' I �� I I � � I � �I � I II \ I � I � II , ---- � Z a t►,) � � � � ---- o � � _ �' _ _ � . � z Q �_ _ _ _ II = IZ Q " I � I I '�~ Z ---- � Z ,� I ... I LL J Q � �! �' � I ......Z� I I � ' I o II � I d I � rr----- -------� _ � � � I �i i � � � , � � �� — - - = _ — � � o ��,� ml � � --------------� � I � II \ LL 10 South Eighth Street t 612_339_2257 Minneapolis MN 55402 sheadesign.com February 20, 2018 RECENED CITY OF Emily Goellner GOLDEN VALLEY City of Golden Valley Planning Dept. �'�� i� 7800 Golden Valley Rd. Golden Valley, MN 55427 Re: Latitude 14 Shea Project No.: 7833.00 Dear Planning Board, Since we submitted our drawings in the middle of January,we were told that there was an error on how our parking calculation was completed,so we have updated the calculation as requested and have resubmitted new floorplans and site plans for review. On behalf of Tarique and Ann Ahmed, new owners of the former Perkins location at 8806 Olson Memorial Hwy,we would like to formally request that you consider approving a variance for the total number of required off-street parking spaces at this location.Ann and Tarique purchased this property to remodel the existing building to a very high caliber. It will still be a full-service restaurant but it will be called Latitude 14.They are intending to serve beer,wine and alcohol here,so as far as we understand,we are going from a Class I(traditional-no liquor)to a Class III(restaurant w/liquor)restaurant according to your Zoning Code. Per the code, if we have a small patio as shown in our submitted site plan and floorplan, we are required to have 94 parking spaces.The current parking lot has 71,and we are willing to move the existing trash enclosure to gain an additional 3 spaces,giving us a total of 74.We are requesting a variance of 20 spaces,which gets us from the required 94 spaces down to what we can fit on our property(74 spaces). We have looked at the current setbacks,and we cannot add additional parking on our site.The side yards are the minimum 10 ft,and we have(2)front yards which have 35 ft setbacks(both of which have existing approved variances from Perkins in place which allowed them to build additional parking within),so our site is maxed out as far as how much we can build.We have also reached out to all of our neighbors to try and make a shared parking agreement deal, and unfortunately none are interested. 7w Avenue South,which is directly to the north of us does appear to have enough width where street parking could be utilized, but we are told that we can not use any spaces on that street to count towards our required off street parking calculation. The main issue here is that Perkins was a Class I restaurant,which has a different parking calculation than a Class III restaurant,and because we are hoping to get a liquor license,we no longer have enough parking spaces on this site.Therefore,we are coming to you for help so we can remodel this property and run it the way the owners intended when they purchased it. Below includes several points that we would like to have you consider in your review of this variance. 1. The City of Golden Valley Zoning Code does not give clear guidelines with regards to parking requirements for restaurant patios. In addition,the city does not have enough restaurants with patios to be able to measure the true need for number of parking spaces for seasonal patios. a. Shea designs a lot of restaurants,and in our experience, in the summer,guests sit outside,and in the winter,guests sit inside.Therefore, patios should not be included in parking calculations because it is an either or scenario, not both. Even the Met Council only counts patio seating as 1/4 of a full indoor seat because it is seasonal and they most likely are in agreement with the above reasoning. b. Other neighboring city parking requirements: i. The City of Minnetonka does not require any additional parking for restaurant patios, you count the interior squarefootage and they disregard the exterior. (1 space per 50 sf of gross floor area or 1 space per 2 seats, whichever is greater, but they don't count patios) R:V800-7899V833.00 LAT 14-NEW RESTAURANT CONCEPT\PLOTS\01-19-18 Planning and liquor license plans\02-19-18 ALTERNATE OPTIONS�etter to planning board 02-20- 18.docx ii. The City of Saint Louis Park does not require any additional parking if a patio is less than 500 sf. (which is the size of patio that we would hope to build and that is shown on our site and floorplans for your review)(1 space per each 60 sf of floor area, and parking will be required at the same rate as the principle use for that portion of outdoor seating area in excess of 500 sf or 10%of the gross building area, whicheveris less, but if the patio is less than 500 sf, it is not counted) iii. The City of Edina requires parking spaces equal in number to 1/3 of the maximum seating capacity, plus 1 space for each employee on the major shift. If we were to go by this calculation,even if we included the patio,that would be only 63 spaces required. 2. The City of Golden Valley's parking calculation is 1 per 60 sf of gross floorplan area and the bar area is separated off as 1 per 25sf. Here at Latitude 14,the bar area requires 11 spaces according to the calculation, but we only have 10 bar seats.This means there is more than 1 parking space per chair at the bar.We do not feel that this is realistic. Latitude 14 is not a bar, it is a restaurant.At the owner's current restaurant location in Brooklyn Park,guests sit at the bar and have a drink before dinner or sit and eat their dinner there.We are not expecting 2-3 people deep standing around the bar like what we think this portion of the code is trying to guard against.The intention of the bar in this restaurant is for guests to be able to make alcoholic beverages for guests to be able to have with their meal at the table. 3. Our indoor seat count is 108. Perkins seat count for the same gross sf was 164.And yet,the parking calculation says that because we will be serving alcohol,we are short parking spaces even with 35%less seats. a. If we average 3 people per car,we would need a total of 36 spaces. b. If we average 2 people per car,we would need a total of 54 spaces(even if we add 15 spaces for each employee to drive separately during the busiest time of day,we only would need 69 spaces). c. With our modified site plan,we show 74 spaces,which we believe is sufficient to accommodate all guests,employees and seasonal patio seating. Some families of 4 will drive together,some tables of 4 will all drive separately.We believe a count of 1 space per 2 guests is reasonable, plus 15 spaces for employees,and not counting the patio because it is seasonal-that would give us 69 required spaces and our 74 spaces would be enough. What will we do if there is not enough parking and we have a very busy night?We believe that we should have sufficient parking for all of our guests and employees based on the reasoning above, based on our occupant load/number of seats and based on the owners experience at their other restaurant.7w Avenue street parking could be our overflow parking if ever needed. At Lemon Grass,which is the owner's other restaurant location in Brooklyn Park,they share 69 parking spaces with a 11,000 sf grocery store and there is sufficient parking for all of their guests on a daily basis. On some Friday and Saturday nights during dinner service when they are very busy,guests park on the street for short periods of time until the grocery store closes at 7pm.After 7pm when the grocery store is closed, Lemon Grass has never had any problems not having enough parking spaces. Lemon Grass has a total seat count of 105 including 10 bar seats,so it would be very similar to what we will have here at Latitude 14 but we have over 69 spaces just to ourselves at all times. Is Perkins using all of the parking that they have and are there ever any parking shortages?Not that we have ever seen. The owners and I have been there several times and we have never seen the Perkins lot full,so there appears to be plenty of parking within the 71 spaces that they currently have to serve their 164 seat restaurant. We look forvvard to discussing any comments or concerns you may have.Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Erica Freeman, Project Architect Shea, Inc. R:V800-7899V833.00 LAT 14-NEW RESTAURANT CONCEPTPLOTS\01-19-18 Planning and liquor license plans\02-19-18 ALTERNATE OPTIONS�etter to planning board 02-20- 18.docx � � r � Z � _ :�; cc� z� O � c •— w ~ °' � � �S J G �_ � d Q �� Q � � Q � �H �N � W Z O LZ c[�� W � z �. �O �o � o � �,� NN U �o� � U W �.y��` OU � T �v Y a ��O�� _ W—�Z � � U 0 a. :'. Z� Z � m t� tgi ' ��W � J �5 � � KJ ,"� C.7 O� N c ��L � w�O Z `_..f., �..�.» w� o � � d O � � .. �. a E' 2 0o C7 � a a ._. �Z a,n s w � � N N '�nd H1L � _ . __,-� - _� _ _ _ __ �_ -:. �� i � i � �U , Z � � � � — �— — — -� — — — � W � � �� f� � Q Q � � �_l � J � � �. � i I! U � > � I� �' I U � � � I 'I--- I pp � d. S ' 0 X � � I i ' w W � --� I p� � U � � � I ---j! c� � � '� w o � r � I; I � I � � I �-- � i cn W N U � � � U U � ^ O O I ' c�n c�n � � w . O U °� tizcz Q 1 I ; - � .' � W � W Q � 1 � � � � � �� C� Cn � � Z ,_.________._._______._______----. .�] .�,.:";�� j .., � °� z O N W W i� � \�\�,;�';�,; v\ I ; —1 � � ' i i ( Q �-- � � U S� I -- ' I F— � O C� Q , ;3 j il I OX �C w � J i. - \ \' 9� ' ��j F �- W � � Cn � ` �q a\'.„ � , I (l� e ! W w � ' ' U cn W � 1 � ; r ?�I � �; � I Q w U ; � U L_ W ¢ __I I I C/� � Q � Z � 5 � % � Q .``�� l;:\ �\\ (� ' F z � � � C� I ' ' I T � �� I WC � � �� ` � � Q � LL O Ln � .,� . . •. � v � C CO N 'y� � � W � � \.� �:. ��r T— � � C� ` . `.. I � Q ll L.\L �� z � Q W Ii ( O � °C � � o N � `�� --�I I � C�1 O �r � � � N � W p cn ;'� � I I i� I 0 � p� 0 �Q Z �� z W O �Ji. I , '( I � w � � � ! � - � � Q Q Q.. � � ;i � � ov z � m t`�-- I , o --�� I f-w- �' z _ � � � `� . I �-- _----�"� J o � � � ~ U _ � -� � z . � — — � T ¢ � �- a � � — ' � � � W � � � � Z () r � � � � h�-- l� -� � _ ---_=� Y E— Q w � = o a � _ ----� ""�� 5 w w o w �n � o � =" �N�G N W P � c n f— z z � E— --� ____---�--=""� �� ,�,mww��a��so�e��,�,��.�_�,�.,,��o��„n wa=,«=o,�,u�3 � � y" z � � -' � _ �t.; co z� O � J o �i O �V w ��'� 2 z g jW Lt' Q �g O� o o e Z O N � �/ � � � J N �N �Y w O d � Z�� Q � � �� W� z � �ZNo � a N � � � ; o Qoa � U W o � Z �. ;L'�, � � � �y> a WU � C� Z � � — m'rn' = w--�z H i'� 1 W c.7 o d � /� � n � pC0 w /^' = ) o m Ni NI m '" �o� Z 'J �" W � o o d O N �' � m � N � waoo E z �i p p a M o ` O o � �s Z ao U' Q Z �s� € � LL � I � � I � O pC z U � w LY.1 ~ � � w l� �`�`� �o� �.L co �W^ o � w�� VJ T Q(n� ( � • • • U O w Q Q w � o�� — � �w� ol v ° z �- 1 '\ I c�\�� \�� ` � \ \ �\�� \�\�\��\�\�\��\�\�\��`� \ `�\ ��\� �\�\��\�\�\ �\� e3�sawna �\\6L \\\\\�\\\\\\�\\\\\\�\\\\\\ \\ \\ \ \ �\�\\\\�\�\\ �\\\ ��i � � � \ �� \ \ � \ � � \ \ � �� \ � \ � \ � � \ `� \ I � //�� \\�\��\\\ �\\\��\\\��\\\\��\\\�� \�\�� \�� \� � �\ Z I �+ J \ � \ � � \ � � � � \ � � \ � � � \ u1 I I � �\ � � �� p I ';' � � � � � � �� ♦ � � �� \\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\`\\\\ \�\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\`\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\ \\ � i ��\��\ ��\�� \�� \�� \ �� i � I � I � \\\\\\\\�\\ \\\\ \ \\�\\\ \\\\\\ \\\\\\ \� \�\� ��\ � � � I ��` � � � � � � � ` � . � � ` � � �� I � \\\\ \\\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\ \ \ \ \\\\ \ \\ \\ \\\\\ \ \\\ \ I I I \ `��\ �`�� `��`��\��\�\�� \�� \��\ � �� `� �\` � �� ` �� ` ��\` �� \` ��\` `\�� \ Q \ \ \ \ \ I �� ` � ` � `� � � � `� � ��\��' � � � a � � ` � � �� `�� ` ��`�� t' � � `�\ �`�\� `` w I G � ` � ` � � � w �� e �° �\� � � ` � � � � ��\�� \ � �� `� �� `�� O oa c - � � ,., \ \ \ \ \ \\,\,\ , ,\ \.\ \\\ ,\.\ \ , ,\ \ ,\.\ ,\,\. , � � � `� \� � .\��`� .\��`� �\� \ .\�\ �\ �.� `\�.\ � ` .�\ ', ~ . ��.��`��.��`��.� �. `��. `.� � �.� �` � `.�� `��. w� i � � � � �� . � `� . � . . � � � . � J� � � � \� � \�� \ \ \ ,,,',. LL � \ C�O I �\ � ��\ � �, \ � �,�\�� \�� \ � � �� W � �� . � , . . � � � . �� . , > aa �� `.��` ` . � ` .�� . � � � `. � `.�� . o I . . . . �\� \\\�\�� \� \ \�\� � � � \\\� � \�\� \� \\� \�\� �\�\�\� \� �� J i 1 I �� \\�� \ �� \ �� \ �� \\ \ �� \\ \�� \ Q �I � � � � � \ � �� \ � \ � \ \ � � � � \ \ � �� Z I � _ I j �� ` ��`�� ` � �� `�� `�� \ � I I I o \� \ � � � \\\�\\\\\\�\�\�\\�\�\ \� �\� N � � -'---�-� r —�v� � � � � � ` � ` � ` � ` � � �`��`�`� � � � � � � �`� � � —� _ I � w � � �\�\ � � � � �\�� `� � � I , i' � I I � � �� \\�\�� \�\� \�\� ��\\� �� \� ��\� � \�\� � �\�\ �\�\��\ �\��\�\� �r � I U -► � � � � � . �� \ � � � � �� . � � � � . � ` I � �� ` � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � ` � ` � � � � � � � � � � � � � � ` � � ` � ` � � a �_ �\�� ` \�� \�� \�� \��`� �\��`� �\��`� � �� \ � � ��`� � �`� � ` � o � �� `�� `�� ` � �� ` �� ` �� ` �� ` ��` ��` � ��`\� � � � � ' \ I I � I w � �. �\ � � \ � � � � � � � \ � � `� � �\ � � \ � � �\\ � �� _____SJ__J� \� \ \\ � \\�� \ \ � \\�� \\�� \ �� \ �� \ ��\ � �� I I /� ��------- --- � �� \�� \�� \.\ �\�\�� \� � �\�\�� \. V p �� \ �� \��\��\� � �•�� \ \\��\�� •� �� S � � � � ` � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �� I ` I a \ \ \\ \ \ � \\ \` \ \\\ \\ \\\\ \\\\\ \\\ \ \ \ \\\\ \ \\ \\\\ \\\\ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ I � �\ � \ � � � � \ � �\ � �\ � � �\ � \ � �\�� \�� \ \ � �\�� \ � �\ \ � �\� � � � � �\�� \� � �\� �� \�� \�� \�� \ \�\ � � �\� � �\� � �\�\� \ \ ��\� ��\` ��\� � �� ` ��\�\� ��\� ��\�\� �� `�� ` �� ` ��\� � �� ` ��\� � ��\� � �� i � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � .� � � ��'� �.�� ' � � �1 � �,'�'� � �� '�'� �.`�'� �.`�'� �.��'� �.� � `�'� � ��' Z . . � , , . , , , � , , � , , � , � , � , . � , �;�,`��;�,`��; .` � `�� `�� .`� ;�,�� ,`� �� . � `�'�� .`,`�;�, `�� ; , I � O . . , . , , .. � , ., . ,,,,� , , , . ,, ,,. � . � �,�,`� �,�, � \ � � � � � � \ �� ' �, , . � . , �, . � �, . , .; ,�. , , �, � �,�,��,�,�, �,�,�.� �, . � � � �, ,� �, .�. � �,�,;�,� ,;�,�,� ;, �,�, � I I � � . , , , , . . , , . , , ,. . , ,, , , • , , , , , . , ,, , , , , . . , . , . . ,., , , , , . ., , , . � �. � . , �. � , � . . � .� ,. , . ,, � , , . .` �� . � , , � . . � , � � , � . � . � � . � . � . � , , . � , . . � . � , , � . , . � ,�' , � , ..., � � � 1 . , , ,�� . � � �� .�� ,� � �. `.� ` . ��`�` � . � ` \��`� ` .�� ` ` �� . .� ,\� � `. � ,`�� . �`, . � ` . �� \ � `�\ � ` � � ` \ � � � ` \�� ` � � � � �� • �\ � � �� \ \ �� \ �•�� `��\�\•��\��•��`�\��\��\\�� ` ��`��\ �� . ��`�\ �` \ ��` � ` � \`�\ ` � \�. � `�\ � ��`�\ ��\\ ��\\ ��`� � `�\ . . � � . � � � � . � � �\ � � �\�,� \� � �\�� \ � � � � \ \ \ \\ \ \\ \ \ - - - ` � � � � � � \�' \ \�\ �\ `\ `\\ \ ` \�\ \\ `\\ \ `� ` ��`� `\� ` � � ` �`� ` `��` ��`��` �� - `� ` ` `� , � \ � � � \ \ � �\�\��\� .\��`�\.\��\�\ � �\.\.\\�\� � � I � I \ � � I � � � � � � � � � � a � ` � � � � � \ � � � `�� `�\ � � � � � � � �`\� � � �� `\�� .�� \`.�� `.�� `�`.��`� �. �� `. �1 �. ` �� `.�� .� \ . ��` . . �. I . � . . � . . � . . � . .,1 �� `\� � \` � � ��\` \��` � �� ` �\��` - - - _ _ ` . � . . ^ � � ` . � ` � � ` � � ` � �.1. ` . ` r I I o - - - - - - - - - z � g ��-- I � _ � � � � I T O —II � I � � Q � � 1-- � o � T N I a � � �o�w��a�wa��aw-��a9m:o�en�,��u��ns3e.�w�.unwm�mec�acn.e w�o<<e�a�ovwa-�nN3 �-'�'��' �� . . , Fa'li'� ��j��]C�II1�i1� �s3-��-�asa/7��-s��-$o�s {�a�} Date: February 22, 2018 To: Emily Goellner, Associate Planner/Grant Writer From: Ted Massicotte, Deputy Fire Chief Subject: CUP 160, Latitude 14 restaurant proposal, 8806 Olson Memorial Highway The updated site plans have been reviewed by the Fire Department and are acceptable as proposed. The elimination of the fire access road on the west side of the building is acceptable due to the building being fully sprinkled. If you have any questions, please give me a call at 763-593-8080. Ted Massicotte Deputy Fire Chief—City of Golden Valley Subject: RE: Latitude 14 CUP Plans From: Eckman, Eric To:Goellner, Emily<EGoellner@goldenvalleymn.gov>; Massicotte,Ted<TMassicotte@goldenvalleymn.gov> Sent:Wednesday, February 21, 2018 11:46 AM Emily, Engineering staff has reviewed the CUP application and plans and has the following comments: 1. I/I Deposit Agreement has been executed.This inspection and any repairs must be completed before occupancy of building. Records show the possibility of two sewer service stubs that could serve the property—one from 7tn Ave and one from Olson Memorial.Staff will work with applicant to determine which is active and what the requirements might be. 2. A sanitary sewer grease collection device may be required according to the city's fats,oils, and grease code and state plumbing code. 3. The site plan shows parking spaces being increased from 71 to 74 and seating decreasing from 164 to 144. Bike parking is proposed at 10 spaces.These changes are acceptable. Please note that on-street parking is only allowed on the north side of 7th Ave at present,and that on-street bike lanes are planned for 7th Avenue in the future. 4. The building appears to be outside of the FEMA, BCWMC, and local floodplain near the intersection of Boone and Golden Valley Road.A small portion of the property in the northeast corner appears to be in the floodplain. According to city code no fill shall be placed in the floodplain area. 5. The existing parking lot appears to drain toward the curb cut and swale in the northeast corner of the lot,then into Trustone Financials storm sewer system. If parking lot work or substantial underground utility work is proposed, modifications must be made to improve drainage and redirect stormwater runoff away from the abutting property and into the City's storm system under 7th Avenue. If more than one-half acre of impervious surface is disturbed or reconstructed, permanent stormwater best management practices for water quality and rate control will be required as specified in city code. If parking lot modifications are proposed,they must meet city code to the extent feasible. 6. The City has plans to construct public improvements in this corridor(including sidewalk, pedestrian, and lighting improvements along 7t''Avenue adjacent to this property) in summer of 2018.Special assessments have been levied for this project.Staff recommends that any infrastructure improvements proposed as part of this CUP be completed before the City's project begins.Questions about the City's project or the coordination of construction activities can be directed to Engineering staff at 763-593-8030. 7. Civil plans must be completed and submitted for review by Engineering staff for any proposed stormwater, grading, and utility work. Domestic water service appears to connect to the main within Olson Memorial Highway. 8. The following permits may be required by Engineering,depending on the scope of work: a. Stormwater Management-$100 plus financial security b. Sanitary Sewer Inflow and Infiltration Compliance-$750 per building for inspection c. Right-of-Way Management-$100-200 per excavation/obstruction plus$5,000 license and permit bond d. Sewer permit-$100+for any sewer work within the property e. Met Council SAC fees, and City fees for SAC and WAC as determined by Met Council SAC units f. Other permits as may be required by other departments and governmental entities 9. A Tree and Landscape Permit is not required unless the impervious area footprint increases by 10�0. In general, the plan appears to show a reduction in impervious surface area and an increase in landscaping plant materials. Please feel free to pass these comments along to the applicant. Eric Eric Eckman � Development and Assets Coordinator � City of Golden Valley =aj' ftt �".' '�' � �� 7800 Golden Valley Road � Golden Valley,MN 55427 � 763-593-8084(direct) � 763-593-3988(Fax) � 763-593-3968(TTY) � ��`�� eeckman@soldenvallevmn.Rov �� city of ,,., r'� C��,'Yl ��1 E 11� t� � � �� 1 ��1 � ��.. �,,.'� Physical Llevelopment Department 763-593-8095/763-593-$109(fax) Date: February 26, 2018 To: Golden Valley Planning Commission From: Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager Emily Goellner, Associate Planner/Grant Writer Subject: Comprehensive Plan Work Session—Water Resources Chapter The sixth chapter of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan has been drafted and distributed to the City Council and the members of the Environmental, Open Space and Recreation, Human Rights, and Planning Commissions for review and comment. Please submit comments no later than 4:00 pm on Monday, February 26 by email or phone. Staff will compile all of the comments and provide a summary with initial reactions at the meeting. An informal Work Session will provide an opportunity to discuss any revisions that should be considered as the full Comp Plan is drafted. Future meetings will cover additional chapters including Economic Competitiveness and Community Profile. Attachments • DRAFT Water Resources Chapter—2040 Comp Plan (32 pages) WATER RESOURCES CHAPTER DRAFT released February �6, 2018 OUTLINE Introduction � Key Points � �;Sto� 2 � 4 C� Existing Conditions&Future Demands • Surface Water �� o Resource Inventory and Assessment o Water Quality � �� o Stormwater Management o Groundwater Management o Water Quantity and Flood Risk o Wetland Management o Shoreland Management o Erosion and Sediment Control o Opportunities • Water Supply o Water Storage and Transmission o Water Consumption o Unmetered Water Use o Emergency Preparedness • Wastewater o System Conditions o Inflow and Infiltration o Lift Stations o Future Demands o Operations and Maintenance Plan Policy Plan Implementation Plan • Summary of Implementation Actions INTRODUCTION The City of Golden Valley contains a rich stock of water resources that contribute to the community's character, health and quality of life. Preservation,conservation and enhancement of these resources are critical to the community.The Water Resources Chapter includes a set of coordinated policies and strategies for managing and improving the City's water supply,wastewater,and surface water systems,which are vital resources that must be sustained for future generations.The City's work is influenced by the Metropolitan Council's 204o Water Resources Policy Plan,which moves beyond simply the management of these resources in order to meet regulatory requirements. Both the City and Metropolitan Council take a proactive planning approach to water resource management, reflecting the value that the community places on natural resources.The City will continue to improve the quality and effectiveness of water resource planning and management through 204o and beyond. KEY POINTS • Continual water quality improvernents to local water bodies and groundwater is crucial. Preservation of wetlands and natural areas is essential work that must continue into the future. • There are a multitude of way to improve the quality and reduce the quantity of stormwater runoff, including the addition of native plants and rain gardens, reducing chemical use, and limiting impervious surface.The City cannot do this work alone. It is important to involve and educate the public on water resource related issues, particularly for stormwater management. • Protection of the City's drinking water supply from pollutants,ensuring access to an adequate supply of drinking water,and decreasing water consumption are vita)to the City's health and prosperity. • The City's infrastructure has aged and it is time to make significant investments in sanitary sewer,water,and stormwater infrastructure. Infrastructure renewal must be addressed in order to maintain the integrity and function of the water resources system for future generations. HISTORY With its proximity to the Mississippi River,this area has a long history of abundant water resources.These resources began to be significantly affect by human settlement in the early to mid�9oos. During this time,development was stil) limited and sporadic. In the tq5os,the population few rapidly with post-war suburbanization.The Village of Golden Valley was involved in water planning, but it wasn't until the�q6os and�q7os that significant government resolution and (ocal management of water resources was introduced. Much of the City of Golden Valley's infrastructure for water resources was installed prior to�q7o. Planning, regulation,and oversight have continued to increase since then.The City works with other agencies to perform this work, including the Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission(BCWMC), Metropolitan Council Environmental Services(MCES),Joint Water Commission(JWC), Minnesota Pollution Control Agency(MPCA), Department of Natural Resources(DNR),and several others.As state and federal laws have changed over the years,the City's role in water resource management has evolved. EXISTING CONDITIONS & FUTURE DEMANDS Surface Water The primary waterway within Golden Valley is Bassett Creek,which runs through many neighborhoods and parks in the City.The creek has a large watershed encompassing more than 4o square miles within the cities of Crystal,Golden Valley, Medicine Lake, Minneapolis, Minnetonka, New Nope, Plymouth, Robbinsdale,and St. Louis Park.The Bassett Creek watershed includes the main branch of Bassett Creek,which originates at the outlet of Medicine Lake,and the Sweeney Lake branch of Bassett Creek,which flows through Sweeney Lake,and joins the main stem within Theodore Wirth Park. Figure 5�� shows the abundance of surface water resources in the community. Figure 5.�: Surface Water Resources ! .._ ._...� , �� , ��; r � . �100 ( j�� 1 � � r t � � � � � �-r � � � , ; � , , � � ,,, � � _ Medicine Lake Rd � � — � � .�•- � � . � �1 � r��' � , '` I 1 � `-� T-t�-r---'-� � � � � � �a �� _ , � ; ` . � ._ 1' � . i ��: �� v , , � � I � ,r � � '�� , �� -� �ss ��o� i�,,� �, ' � , � : � � - o . -�� . �1� � �� St �� . r �r o Val! �� i �� i z Du/ �1 / iden �- . --� . � � – , � •L"...; �� .. � , . ,. .` , . , � ,. � � �_ > � � � � _ / z--_ , "t I � t ' , f� , <,_ , � , � �� f ,� � G ! , � � � � � � 1 � x� o ; , � , I � i i i f y i �_. � 7 N � , A ',�_, __. j : ��ett C r �k o 0�0.l _ y ; �� _- � , ' � _� �, , � �, , � ,� _. �� a . _• St i' � , r e°d.;� � -i <, . . _. . ; , , i � ' � � r .' �._.'. � , � i ___ . � ---•--•.�_�_.._,� � � , -�"� -- � � . , �,�1 ' , � � ._.,_„ �v t� r'' . � � �- . _ , . . �;� 1 � t i--- _ _ "'"�---y < <� a� , � , ,. 55 b� �j ' e �. , .0 -�`., _' � f 55 �-- ' a `� � I �' � c;� �. � . � o � ,�� e ��'� �r �1 ; ` , m, � . G1eh , , , o r..,,�,� �., _,� , 'djo �, � `�.Q i �I ; � � � ��ke -, � f �� y. �, ey �� oa � � _ air /� �� ' � � . ;� � -------�,- � y � , � �. , _ _ � � � � �� . � „ _� � .�,_. e �'�, '�., i � � _ . , � , r 7B9 � � � . . �� , r' �� t � Z t '" � � -' ' , `� L� , �.`''�' , � . � �� , , j�,r,; � ; � , ,oo � ' � � ! � �:�� . :.__. ��_, � , � . �,, . ._�. ., � � ' `' ro , ri'��'� � �rf�.. . ` � • � � ` . f � f, � � n, x, \ r� � 1 _ - - , �� o.� - --- : � , ' , � '� •---'. r Q� �, � i_� ��; — — _' , �_,� . � ' f--------------� ,.�-- � , ,.f t � � . �� Surface Water Resources �� Streams i �akes and Ponds � Other Wetlands G 0.25 0.5 t Mile I � 1 i 1 Sources:Nennepin County Surveyors Office for Property Lines(2oi7),City of Golden Valley for all other layers(2oi7). As a result of the City's water management efforts, many of the large recreation lakes, ponds,wetlands,creeks, wooded areas,and parks have been preserved from development and other pressures. Part of the City's ongoing water management efforts include developing and implementing a Surface Water Management Plan ($WMP).The Plan impacts land use planning and development within the City.The entire Plan is included in the appendix of this Chapter.The purpose of the SWMP is to provide a complete and detailed guide and reference for the City in protecting and managing water resources within the City, including stormwater.The Plan assists the City with policy decisions,water resource management, implementation priorities, regulatory program references,and capital improvement budgeting to address water resource issues. It is consistent with the guidance from the Metropolitan Council, BCWMC,and Minnehaha Creek Watershed District(MCWD). "!�' 1�' '�f�� "`,,,;:"S ��ill ��,�., ` ��` Y,�;� � ' •. � ��r ��4�' � �� x � ' `;� ,+ a: ��F ,� � ��t i.�' �,y.'� � �� , .e.� ►A� ��i '* � j,: ♦ .�..`a� r'M $t '0�x'' :`'� k.,Y I�; q , 4! , . ..' 'fii� ` + 'S '� 'Y 'Y � � -��, �I �� -�, a �� ¢�c ' ,� , � ,� � . .-: � � ��1� �� *��r.�!'. r g �� fi t�a,� �".��,� �'�y+ •.�4»i, :�� * ��.� �� ., ., $��. .�'�, ��.�,�s�,�` � ".+i� �.. �, � � . ' �� a�'' � . � �qrt'�^W"r" .. � . m� a, � t, , � � • `, dLL � * �`��# � �, �� •w. '�'��: q5y�`. yypT .,t� '� 8 .. �(��°.�'$�! "*. ~�� b�� '' `} " ,.'w� . . . . � ��, .+b�y {'�� y�a�i.. ,� .; ��• w,. � �� I". � u:.�',a. ��4 ��`.��.�'"�... .ee�. . .�.f�� E _ . .. �� .s,��,�" x. . ��. Bassett Creek Photo Credit:BCWMC Resource Inventory and Assessment The SWMP provides technical information, maps,and tables that describe the surface and subsurface conditions of the City.This includes information regarding climate and precipitation,topography,watersheds and drainage patterns, land use,soils,geology and groundwater resources,surface waters,wetlands and natural resources,water quality, water quantity and flooding,fisheries and aquatic habitat, recreational and scenic areas,and potential pollutant sources.There is also information about the City's stormwater management system, including an inventory of the major and minor sub-watersheds and stormwater management infrastructure. Based on this inventory,an assessment of issues and opportunities was performed. Issues include: • Water quality:including stormwater runoff water quality, MPCA impaired waters,total maximum daily load studies,waterbody classification and water quality goals,water quality BMP maintenance,and other water quality issues. • Water quantity and flood risk reduction: including floodplain management, hydrologic and hydraulic modeling,and areas of local flood risk • Wetland management:including wetland and shoreland buffers,aquatic invasive species,and wetland classification and inventory • Groundwater management:including infiltration,groundwater sustainability,and wellhead protection • Erosion and sediment control:including Bassett Creek erosion issues � Interagency issues:include maintenance of infrastructure and park areas not owned by the City Water Quality lssues The lakes, ponds, streams,and wetlands in the city of Golden Valley are important community assets.The City recognizes the need for good water quality in its waterbodies has taken steps to protect and improve these resources.These steps include adopting water quality management policies,collecting water quality data, reviewing projects for conformance with water quality performance standards,and implementing water quality improvement projects.The quality of surface water is compromised by pollutants from development. The City utilizes programs and the enforcement of regulations to limit pollutant(oading. Pollutant loading from developed areas may have significant negative impacts on water quality and ecological function of water resources. For lakes, ponds,and wetlands, phosphorus is typically the pollutant of major concern. Within the City, nonpoint source runoff,especially stormwater runoff, is a major source of pollutant loading.The City works to limit pollutant loading from stormwater runoff through implementing its project review and permitting program,appropriate operation and maintenance of its stormwater management system,as well as capital projects designed to reduce the amounts of stormwater generated(e.g., (ow-impact development)and/or remove pollutants from stormwater.The City aims to achieve pollutant load reductions as required by the state or watershed management organizations as well as BCWMC and state water quality standards in City lakes and streams to preserve beneficial uses. Most stormwater in Golden Valley eventually flows into Basset Creek,which is an impaired water,and does not meet water quality standards for chloride,fish and insect bio-assessments,and fecal coliform(bacteria). Increased precipitation and freeze/thaw cycles may make it more difficult to maintain stormwater practices that help reduce pollution and maintain the health of surface water. More freeze/thaw cycles may lead to an increase in the amount of salt/deicer that is applied to the roads,which may deteriorate stormwater facilities and the quality of the water.The primary concern in Golden Valley is the health of surface water such as Basset Creek,which may degrade as heavy precipitation events and freeze/thaw cycles increase. The City implements best management practices to reduce storrnwater impacts on surface water.These practices include, but are not limited to cleaning ponds,stormwater pipes, catch basins and outlets;as well as installing and cleaning sump catch basins and manholes.The City sweeps streets in spring,summer,and fall,and continues to use innovative approaches to reduce and better target the application of chloride in winter while still taking public safety into account. Redevelopment is the primary opportunity to make improvements to water quality treatment as well as volume and rate control,filtration, infiltration,and reuse. Pollutant concentrations exceeding applicable state water quality standards may impair a waterbodies beneficial use(s)and can result in a waterbody's inclusion on the MPCA's 3o3�d) Impaired Waters List. For impaired waterbodies,the MPCA requires a total maximum daily load � � � �'�:�'`�-�.'�`' (TMDL)study to be completed to identify the sources of the §�''i , ;� ^ .� ,.s;�,� „„� impairment and strategies to restore water quality.The City * "� �,�� ` �� works with the BCWMC and MCWD to address � � impairments located within their respectivejurisdictions. �`, � _ '� t.ne � •� -'' ,�� p . , '��3� . ��«.. , ,��,� , � Impaired waters located within or downstream of Golden - < ` t - � s .,.� ;� Valley include: '��"�.� -�r `�� ,� , � � � • Sweeney Lake o`., � ;� r�''` � '�` � ��,, • Wirth Lake f'� ��`� � v' _ , '� • Bassett Creek(Main Stem) ,� ,�*�� Medicine Lake � € ' ; ��, �� • Minnehaha Creek ' - '�� -•v��_ ;�h��_ .:, .. "t�� ` ,� • Lake Niawatha � '� rztf �l � -' : �" _ __= � '"•� �.� �`��`�.. `_. �� Enhanced water quality can achieved by: Students from the SEA School collect water samples • Protecting and enhancing fish and wildlife habitat. • Maintaining and enhancing the integrity and ecological function of aquatic resources and shoreland areas • Minimizing pollutant loading from stormwater runoff through non-point source pollution reduction and treatment • Complying with all applicable stormwater regulations established by the Federal Government,State of Minnesota, Nennepin County, BCWMC, MCWD,and Metropolitan Council • Minimize the volume of stormwater runoff entering Bassett Creek Stormwater Management Aging,damaged,or undersized infrastructure may impair the function of the City's stormwater system.The City's infrastructure renewal program coordinates utility improvements with road reconstruction to minimize disturbance and cost, prioritizing areas of the City where improvements are most needed to provide the City's intended services. The City considers the condition and function of stormwater infrastructure in prioritizing areas for renewal. The City utilizes best management practices(BMPs)to control or reduce the pollutants in stormwater runoff to the maximum extent practicable.These BMPs are a combination of education,operations and maintenance,contro) techniques,system design and engineering methods,and other such provisions that are appropriate to meet the requirements of the NDPES permit.The SWPP, located in the appendix of this Chapter, identifies measurable goals, �� ¢��` *�i��;"�'� �.,, . � �� j ��_ I � an implementation schedule,and the City staff responsible '� ' ' ��'�4 to complete each measure. , � `'°` " '�'''�'��.• # x. `,�: , �,,�. L � � . . The City also maintains official controls,ordinances, and `►�'':�• ,�.� • -�" '�"�'` "°i � � �� :�,,,r.,._ • a�r��"�'�'�� ,�. � :;�,a «;�� .._.�+�.,»; desi n standards that limit the im act of develo ment and �" � ' ��..:`�' � ' �""" g P p � .,. �. � v �� , redevelopment on the City's infrastructure and natural �, �'�"` � � � F� .z �. ,� �� , �' resources.The City requires permits and/or approvals for ��:•; r,, ., � '} � ,� ! � land disturbing projects(including developments), ` '° ;, depending on the type and size of the project. �.�`�� , "4 �' ;� �, . ;�� _ v,,�,��,� �� : a, �. ,��. ,f,,. The City's stormwater and water resource management �� .k�,; � i ro ram includes several com onents, includin ' ' �' �^'�` '�; �� '� � ` p g p g �`Y,x�' ,.�?�; s ,,,,��r��,� ,,�« , .A.� ��'�`� y '�i implementation of the City's NPDES MS4 stormwater �` ?�� ' �`: j`� �_ �'�'�;��* f� '�;', permit and SWPPP,specific tasks requested or required by ' �'�'�� ` r �'� "a' �"� �'�� the BCWMC and MCWD, inspection,operation,and Stormwater pond with native buffer maintenance of the City's stormwater management system, implementation of the City's project review and permitting program(i.e., regulatory program),education and public involvement,as well as the implementation of studies and capita) projects. Implementation occurs through capital improvement projects,the Infrastructure Renewal Program (IRP),various studies,and ongoing programs specifically listed in the appendix of this Chapter. Groundwater Mana eg ment The city is underlain by Prairie du Chien-Jordan bedrock aquifer.Some groundwater from the glacial drift and the St. Peter aquifer discharges into Bassett Creek. Movement of groundwater within the aquifers in the region are complicated by the intersecting buried bedrock valleys. As part of the Joint Water Commission, Golden Valley currently obtains its water supply from the City of Minneapolis water department.There are plans to construct an emergency supply wel) in the Prairie du Chien-Jordan aquifer in the future if there is sufficient need. Other cities that border Golden Valley use groundwater for their municipal water supplies. It is crucial that the quantity and quality of groundwater resources be protected for future generations.This can be done in a variety of ways.The City will cooperate with efforts of BCWMC, MCWD and others to educate the general public regarding the importance of implementing BMPs to protect groundwater quality and quantity. Also,the City will cooperate with St. Louis Park, Robbinsdale, Plymouth, and Minnetonka regarding wellhead protection programs and activities. Lastly,the City will aim to promote groundwater recharge , increase the groundwater base flow of Bassett Creek,and work to establish more uniform local policies and official controls for groundwater resources.The increased population in the Twin Cities metropolitan area has put increased pressure on groundwater quantity and quality. The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) is responsible for the protection of groundwater quality and aims to prevent contaminants from entering the recharge zones of public water supply wells through its wellhead protection program. This includes the development of wellhead protection plans (WNPPs) and guidance to limit potential for groundwater contamination. Wellhead protection efforts may restrict or prevent the use of certain stormwater BMPs within these areas to prevent possibly contaminated stormwater from reaching groundwater supplies. Water Quantity and Flood Risk Floodplains are important ecolc�gical features,as they are the primary interface between the aquatic and terrestrial habitats. Floodplains tend to be seasonal wetlands,and areas that are protected from development and encroachment,as they allow a safe place for seasonal flooding,which protects homes, businesses,and infrastructure. Floodplains are based on the elevation of water that is expected to occur within a defined frequency of occurrence. From a regulatory standpoint,floodplains are defined as the elevation of water caused precipitation events,which have a t percent chance of occurring in a given year.This floodplain has been identified on Figure 5•2• Nistoric urban development within the City and higher precipitation amounts �,� �� have increased the rate and volume of '�:�' stormwater runoff generated by ��'"K `` precipitation,which has increased the risk of flooding.To address areas of _ significant flooding along Bassett , �' " �� Creek,the City, BCWMC,and other �"`` �-�--l- state and federal agencies cooperated , . ��,.,. �t.�-�; to construct the BCWMC Flood -• Control Project. Construction of the �� '�*` $ Flood Control Project and continued Flooding can limit street access temporarily in residential neighborhoods BCWMC and City flood risk reduction practices have addressed the most significant flooding issues along Bassett Creek,though flooding issues still exist.Continuing Bassett Creek flood control tasks include: • Maintaining and repairing the Flood Contro) Project system, � Managing development and redevelopment throughout the watershed to minimize the risk of flooding • Identifying and implementing additional projects to reduce flood risk along the Bassett Creek trunk system. • Flood-proofing or voluntary acquisition of homes that are remaining in the floodplain • Regulating stormwater runoff discharges and a• >;,�„�� o: ��. ':. �,� >,.��-�� , : volumes to minimize flood risk,flood damages, � � }{;� �,�: ' �' 1 �i��t-�,, �;� '``- �; . and the future costs of stormwater �� 4;�,� _ � ':� �.'` `�,� ., � management systems �'� �=�r ��<"� � '��.� �''�� ;��.,�"; In 20�7,the BCWMC adopted a new flood elevation '��` � `��; �� '�"�` � � ,,,;, � r model,which is used to help guide the design and � "4 ` µ`�' � review of projects and development.The City will �=°' �� '�� , �`�` �''" continue to use this model and other data to evaluate � � � ` �`e�� -- { � `�"° specific areas of elevated flood risk and evaluate ��'� �� ' � *_ ,;ar ;� options to address these risks.Areas of potential `` - flooding identified by recent modeling include the following: {�° �" Y =. • DeCola Ponds/Medicine Lake Road `��w��'��h` ;�_ �"�. �� • Minna ua Pond Briarwood Nature Area �� ' �� • �>��;• .��.` / } • Lakev ew Park Area �t �� , � t ��" .'.n�;r.�.�� __:^,u 1 .�F ` � �, • � � �.� a.,�.� v��. x • Nampshire Park Area Hi�hway 55 Ffood Control Structure � Medley Park Area • Wesley Park Area It is important that the City minimize the risk of flooding along Bassett Creek, its tributaries, and other flood prone a reas. • Protect human life, property,and surface water systems that�nay be damaged by flood events. • Maintain the City's stormwater system to consistently provide the intended level of service and protection � Implement strategies to manage the impact of future increased precipitation and changing climate patterns on City stormwater infrastructure and planning Figure 5.2: Floodplain _�.� f' I � �;;, 1 � ;�oo' � � I �- � � i t � , �' ! j Medicine Lake Rd � � ! � 1 � , t � '�J'.� _ '� _�. ,� � �� I � � - " � � i �, � � , I _�_� ., , , � 1 { „ ' - G . . .y ,_. _ � ,� �` �-1 7._ ` i � I � �� __ ,. �, 169 � � � � ( � �� : � �-, �� i� Ou� �-�ol aij� _ � � — 1� 2 ` �' -• 9t C� � � � r,, d ; �� ; , -�,_ �., , m � �.� . , , � .�;r . '�..1 1� Q � �` ' � . ��,,._ . , ._. , ( � �-� � � � � .�� "'�. '< r �, . � �. � `, _ r� � _ ... � _ _. , ❑ _ � � ( I � � y f�tI � � .�� -� ��\ � • � ��i ti. ' •�y ' , _.F ,. ' � O �'� � ��_. . r l �:_ �� ' �. . ; .{ , Q� '1 } i Qdp(�-' i.�. �, � ' . � � ' �'i' � j � �.r ¢� � � , . . � : .e' , �_.�i , _ � ` � � ' � r i � F-, " �� Y � � i • �� r ,, � � • � i ��--- u ,,.. .. � > 55 I ,� , , , '`. - , . � 55 �� ; _. � , . � ,- � , � � . ., II�. � � , t ., � r � 2 � �� . G' . �� : y ... . �.. � . _ � � i �; � ; `�,� en'� ; w r r�,: a Pv.a l r'r �� , j �o°��,..._; l ti, + �� - #a � -y �� eo _.._..�,_ .: � � �� ; , , , 1fi9 � Q , �/ �a� �_-•_--_-' � �`. � �_ � � ' ! . m . . r ,, •' � • �� . . i ,.� ac " 100 �`* � �� .�, � � a _ � ,�. � � , . _ � ��.�.. � . � �. , �--- . � � . , - . : - - � , ; d � . , , � r! x� � �'. � i --..:....�__� -----•• -- — � — I i i , , , �r i i k /{ �_.--------- i ��:. �� -;----r- � { � . ` . Floodplain �;,;� BCWMC Jurisdictian � Local Jurisdiction 0 0.25 �5 1 Mile l i 1 � t Sources:Nennepin County Surveyors Office for Property Lines(2ot7).BCWMC for t��o annual chance floodplain model(20�7), City of Golden Valley for all other layers(2ot7). Wetland Mana e� ment Prior to development, much of the land within the city of Golden Valley was wetland. Many wetland areas were drained or filled as the city developed(prior to the establishment of regulations protecting wetlands). Although Golden Valley is almost completely developed, numerous wetlands remain across the city.Several wetland and natural resource inventories have been completed for the city of Golden Valley.The City is committed to preserving and enhancing the quality of wetlands as well as natural areas adjacent to wetlands.The specific management techniques utilized is based on a variety of factors. An inventory,assessment of needs,and management practices are detailed in the City's SWMP and the Natural Resources Management Plan(NRMP). Erosion and Sediment Control The BCWMC and its member cities have identified the extent and severity of stream bank erosion along most of the Bassett Creek trunk system,including the portion of Bassett Creek passing through the city. The City's original inventory was completed in 2003 and it has been updated annually since then.The City estimated the extent of erosion as a percent of the entire bank that was eroding,and classified these locations as minor(less than 25 percent), moderate(25-5o percent),and severe(more than 5o percent).Typically,the City found the causes of erosion were related to concentrated runoff from parking lots,streets,and ditch drainage, storm sewer outfalls discharging above the normal water level of the creek,surface runoff across exposed unvegetated slopes,steep slopes,or shaded slopes, and finally,areas where turf is maintained to the edge of the creek with no vegetative buffer area.Additionally,the City identified problems with utility structures including rusty corrugated metal pipes, broken or cracked concrete pipes, pipes pulled apart at the joint,flared end sections that have been removed, buried pipe outlets,significant deposition at the outlet of a structure,debris blocking a structure,as well as protruding pipes and outlets located above the normal water levels of the creek. To address stream erosion issues,the BCWMC has identified and implemented capital projects to restore streambank areas since the initial stream erosion inventory was performed. Future projects to restore remaining stream erosion issues are included in the BCWMC capital improvement program and the City's implementation program.Stormwater Management Permits are issued by the City in order to utilize best practices and monitor construction projects on private property.The City is committed to minimizing erosion and sedimentation for all of the water resources in the community.Soil protection and sedimentation controls will be utilized to maintain public health,safety,and welfare. Opportunities Major opportunities for the City to consider in addressing these issues are summarized at the end of this section,and include cooperative efforts with WMOs, partnerships with adjacent cities, redevelopment opportunities, and coordination with other City programs, including the City's infrastructure renewal program. As a fully developed City,there are limited opportunities and resources for the City to implement capital improvements to address water quality,water quantity,or natural resource issues.To maximize the effectiveness of its water resource management program,the City seeks to leverage the following opportunities: • Partnerships-the City cooperates with the BCWMC, MCWD, Minneapolis Parks and Recreation Board,and state agencies to carryout water resource activities and projects designed to achieve common goals.The City also partners with neighboring cities to address intercommunity stormwater management issues. • Redevelopment-opportunities for updating and upgrading the City storm drainage system will exist primarily in redevelopment activities. As private and public properties redevelop,the City will implement the policies and regulatory controls at its disposal to perform improvements to the stormwater system. • Infrastructure Renewal Program-through this program,the City evaluates and prioritizes infrastructure (including stormwater infrastructure)for rehabilitation and replacement.Activities performed through this program provide opportunities to address surface water issues by improving stormwater conveyance capacity, retrofitting water quality improvements,and implementing other best management practices. • Coordination with other City/WMO programs-coordinating stormwater and surface water management activities with other City programs(e.g., park improvements) presents an opportunity to increase operational efficiency, reduce costs,and limit the frequency and duration of disruptions to City services. Water Supply From the years of early settlement in Golden Valley,drinking water was supplied to the population via private wells on individual properties.Starting in the early 796os,Golden Valley's drinking water has come from the Mississippi River and is treated and conveyed by the City of Minneapolis.Since the mid-�96os,Golden Valley has been a member of the Joint Water Commission (JWC),a partnership that includes the cities of Crystal and New Nope.These three cities jointly own and operate the water system that stores and transmits potable drinking water throughout the three-city service area.The JWC currently purchases Minneapolis potable water under a 2o-year agreement signed in 2004, which replaced a previous agreement signed in�963•As the supplier, Minneapolis must deliver treated water that meets federal Primary Drinking Water Standards. The Joint Water Commission owns 3 Wells,which could be used in the event of an emergency to provide back-up drinking water.The JWC system consists of three elevated storage tanks and five underground reservoirs,three in Crystal and two in Golden Valley.The system also has three emergency back-up wells that have been installed within the last few years. In addition to the water reservoirs,the JWC owns and maintains�b miles of pipe that are�b-inch in diameter or larger,eight miles of which are(ocated in Golden Valley.Golden Valley owns and maintains the smaller diameter(less than�b-inch)watermains. The City of Golden Valley faces a continua) need to operate, maintain,and invest in its water supply and distribution system. Less than 5�0 of the City's�28 miles of watermain(less than�6-inch diameter)has been repaired or replaced. The City has a significant amount of aging infrastructure,which has seen an increase in the amount and costs of maintenance(pipe breaks,deterioration,sink holes)over the past 2o years. Much of the system needs to be replaced or rehabilitated.The major vulnerability is the � �*- , � � �; .., ,� age and condition of the underground � ^��;; ��" , "'� :� # ;, I ^ infrastructure within the City,as well as the �` � i• ;�=°"�' water i es comin into the Cit as art of the `' `�� ' P�P g Y p ,� .� � ��`;,k .. Joint Water Commission system. Increased � > ` - . � precipitation and freeze/thaw cycles have the � �'� �"'�'�� potential to stress and shock built infrastructure �"`�:- '�'" ,;Y, � `.� ,* Knn.: systems like pipes(stormwater,sanitary sewers, ' ?-� :� �" water),roads,and bridges.This may result in ` � `a " - f; increased maintenance costs,structural damage � { +��;�.' ' � °� to public infrastructure,damage to private ' � ��: �� s F �f properties,disruption of services,and � •�;, inconveniences to residents. � �.. ... �, � . k.:�:� . ,�.�r The new challenge for the JWC and the City of Crews respond to a water main break in Robbinsdale Golden Valley is to develop a comprehensive repair/replacement strategy for the water systems to maintain the current(evel of service.The challenge will be to balance the repair/replacement given that the majority of the pipes are reaching the end of their service life. It is not feasible to replace the majority of the water system at once. Prioritizing replacement will be the leading challenge. Water Storage and Transmission Water from the Mississippi River is treated in Fridley, Minnesota,and then stored in five ground reservoirs and three elevated tanks,providing a total of 3t.5 million gallons of storage for the JWC water system.The Golden Valley reservoir consists of two 4•5 million-gallon(MG)tanks that typically receive water from the City of Minneapolis between�t pm and 6 am.There are also three reservoirs in Crystal.Water is pumped from the reservoirs and into the JWC water transmission system by four vertical turbine pumps. Due to the level terrain,the Golden Valley water system operates as a single pressure zone.The JWC water system also has three elevated water tanks,one in Golden Valley and two in New Nope.These tanks provide a total of 3•5 million gallons of operating storage.They are used to store water during low demand periods and release water during high demand periods and emergency situations,such as fires. In addition,the JWC owns and maintains�b miles of pipe that are�b-inch in diameter or larger,eight miles of which are located in Golden Valley.Since the water system is deemed adequate to provide both storage and fire pumping capacities during maximum day demand through 2027,the JWC has no current plans to expand or modify the water system. Figures 5•3 and 5•4 shows the water supply system in terms of location,size, material,and ownership. Figure 5.3: Water Supply System by Ownership and Size , i � ------------•�� . i il .� � ; ��oo� ) _�� '� ' t I i -; } k k` . i � � �. E '�� 1 � , Medicine Lake Rd t � �' i � , �. �._.._.._ ; ��.�} .._.�.� I �`� � , ' � � ' � j 169 � �, � '�/ � ' 9;, � � z � .�/4f`S� Go4de�vaIle Rd �.lS_._,�\ � x � " ' i ti'�.._� m � Q .. �� ' � j `�� yt, ' �I , . p I} .� � p� � r''� ' �;..� � ] i" i , '_� .< �_}-.--��- � � � , � 1 � �� } �� ; _ _ ��,.�,,,,...x-..° o° ��:t ,� oaoc� �( 1 , a . � � � ( � „ f �s�;�� , � �� . � � ��,. .c , � -t �,,� , <�, ... ,��.�__, T_.._ _ �__. , �' �;;5 � ; � « ; � _ I _, � . .-._,_� _ r_--' �-�--.-_.__, % ( �55 i� '�� 55 -� "�•.b,a;,� �� i ,i m c�e�� ✓ � t ; � ��oo , �_ �.o � �pve� _ . a ; ` � � ', �, 'q` �, en�o° I _.�__�, _, i � � � � ,, � c�� ss � a ��` � h�� r � � � � � s.t.�,, .�+��.�,- > � �o0 c � • � i _ � � (t� �,., _ � .� � S"' / X' . � J� ___,. 1 � � _____._._._---• - � -i � iy j � � ' �......._ .._.._ , ,.-._,--«- .., . � �-�-""" i .r . �. . . . .�m Water Main by Ownership and Size � Minneapolis,48` � JWC,Elevated Storage Tank � JWC,16'and larger � JWC,Reservoir City,t2"and t4' City,io'and smaller O G.25 G.5 1 Mile I 1 1 1 1 Sources:Nennepin County$urveyors OFfice for Property Lines(2ot7),City of Golden Valley for all other layers{2ot7). Figure 5•4: Water Supply System by Material ! � _ i�i; �\I � . i�oo _ �'a ',, , . � � . � ,- � 1 � i ' � I i ; �, �, � � � � � Medicine Lake Rd � # '� � g �,. � � �� h�� ! Y t ' 4 , ; � � , A ,� , . � , , � ,�� . ,� �� f , 169 " < ` '' k' � � U ih St " 1 n Va , � . � � , ...:�.... �' � � C : N �: 1.I i ! � _ � � + � � ... -�,� ��L` 7 � ��, � �i �! ' � : �odotm� L-� � � € .� �� l ;. ,; r � -}� �'' e 7" ' ' r'' g �� , r. ., ..t. ; ., ,. _ __,_ ,�� f 55 �' � 1 �1' 55 � � ,- ._ � , � � , > , � � _"��` �. ' �i �. � ! . �.,, ao �"� a pv e 1 ._ � _ � �' .�+� a.�� o° I �.._---�' �o;i " n,� � �, : �, , , �Ve � °' ' ' _�� 169 �" „ ^' � � � iW, �� ., �� ' m,700 , � � h � E \ x . ; I j � ,�s. - � . �p � � . �. .�.. . , , y.. � r � ' �� . .n '. ....m,.... ,. t 1 � . „ ! / ' ..__,. ;..x � � ��..��..�.�'.. . � . `� ��" � � � � �� .._.._.._ , ,�� f i-i—'"�.--�-^-�; Water Main by Material CIP,PCCP,and UP(generally over 5o years old) DIP,I-IDPE,and Cured Liner(generally under 5o years old) U 0.25 G.5 1 Mil2 I � 1 � 1 Sources:I-lennepin County Surveyors Office for Property Lines(2oi7),City of Golden Valley for all other layers{20�7). In 2o�b,the JWC performed a system wide study on all of the Prestressed Concrete Cylinder Pipe(PCCP)that makes up the JWC distribution system.A mode) of the system was developed to demonstrate how the system will operate during varying flows and pressure scenarios. Nydrants were used to collect data and pressure fluctuations across the system to calibrate the model. Forensic testing was then done on sections of pipe excavated from the ground and the findings were used in the model.The study determined a criticality ranking on each segment of PCCP throughout the three Cities.The results of the study found that the majority of the PCCP in the JWC system is in good condition in relation to the age of the pipe. No part of the PCCP system is in need of immediate replacement. Nowever, PCCP will still be proactively replaced on an opportunity basis as street projects allow. The City of Golden Valley is responsible for�28 miles of watermain(less than�b-inch diameter),of which less than 5��0 has been replaced or rehabilitated.Approximately 73%of the water system is nearing the end of its useful life.The average cost to repair or replace one mile of pipe is$7.4 million. The JWC and the City of Golden Valley are faced with the new challenge of developing a comprehensive repair/replacement strategy for the water systems in order to maintain the current level of service. It is not feasible to replace the majority of the water system at once. Prioritizing replacement wil) be the leading challenge.The majority of the City of Golden Valley's water distribution system was installed in the late 5os and early 6os and consists of cast iron pipe which is brittle and prone to breaking.These mains are reaching the end of their design life as more and more watermain breaks are occurring each year. The City is also implementing a long-term infrastructure renewal program to systematically identify and prioritize replacement and rehabilitation of the underground public utilities including watermain,storm sewer,sanitary sewer, and streets. It will be called the Infrastructure Renewal Program(IRP).The program will commence once the street reconstruction portion of the Pavement Management Program is substantially completed.The IRP involves breaking the City into 4o different areas to go through infrastructure rehabilitation or replacement in the first year and pavement rehabilitation in the second year of each of the 4o neighborhoods.The City has recently adopted and will continue to develop funding mechanisms to fund the IRP.The IRP utilizes a systematic approach to prioritize replacement across the City in a cost effective manner.The City of Golden Valley will adopt the IRP to address aging infrastructure issues. Water Consumption The water supply system is - • • - - � - . • designed to meet current and expected future water Average consum tion of Golden Valle Day p y Year Population Water Service Total Water yyater residents.Over the last�o years, Connections Sold(MG) Golden Valley's population has Demand been fairly consistent and water (MGD) demand has shown a slight 2007 20,9�0 7,o59 ( 1,040 2.84 decline(see Table 5.�)• -- Reductions in water use during 2008 20,3�7 7,13q �,028 2.82 this time appears to be due to 2oog 20,508 7,�50 �,00b 2.76 low flow fixtures, precipitation, and conservation. Nistorical 20�0 20,37� 7,�43 887 Z•43 annual water sales data is 2ot� 20,595 7,i44 934 z.56 reported in three customer 2012 20,773 7,139 �,008 2.76 categories: residential, commercial and industria)(see 2013 20,845 7,�41 9�$ 2•5� _ _ Table 5•2)•Over the last�o years, 20�4 20,866 7,�49 $a7 �•Z� residential water consumption - has averaged 62 percent of water ._.__?0�5 20,57� 7,�4$ 787 2.1b _ _ _ __ __ _ _ __ _ .___.._ ___ _.._. ._ sold. 2o�b 20,367 7,157 7b8 2.70 ' - . - - Year Residential Commercial Industrial Total (gallons) (gallons) (gallons) 2007 654.777,n5 270,786,223 n5,�b5,b62 7,040,66q,0oo soo8 627,803,000 3to,768,000 89,363,000 7,027,934�000 2009 636,446,000 287,738,000 82,bq5,000 1,006,879.000 2010 ' 547,476,000 267,388,000 73,o�b,000 887,880,000 Zp�� 554,757�000 308,845,000 71,171,000 934�773.000 2O1z ; 632,683,000 2q8,4o8,000 78,479,000 7,009�570,000 2073 556,t32,000 285,43�,000 77,389,000 978,95�,000 2074 5�6,707,000 2�6,239,000 74,74L000 807�687.000 2p�5 499,i55,000 273,268,000 74,7�6,000 787,13q,000 2076 486,605,000 2io,336,000 7i,776,000 � 768,717,000 ; , Total Water 5,7�2,48i,�i5 2,669,207,223 8o8,5i�,662 9,�9o,soo,000 ' Sold(gallons) � � Percentage b2% 2q% , q9�6 The City is challenged with reducing the per capita residential water consumption in a manner that minimizes operations financial impacts and creating appropriate incentives for commercial and multi-family residential customers to reduce water consumption through water-saving irrigation systems and landscaping. Per capita water use is determined by dividing total daily water use(including residential,commercial,and industrial categories)by the total service area population and is expressed as gallons per capita per day(GPCPD).Total residential per capita water use has averaged 75 GPCPD over the last�o years(see Table 9•3)• Residential per capita water consumption is calculated by dividing the average residential daily water demand by the total population. For Golden Valley,this falls within the range normally expected for residential water use and is about average for the Twin Cities metropolitan area. - . - � - - Total Water Residential Residential Tota) Year Population Sold(gallons) Water Sold GPCpD GPCPD (gallons) 2007 2o,qoo �,040,669,000 654,7�7,7i5 85.8 736.4 2008 20,3�7 �,027,934,000 627,803,00o g4.6 738.6 2009 20,508 �,006,879,000 636,446,00o g5•o 134•5 z010 20,37� 887,880,000 547.476,000 73.6 17q.4 , z071 20,595 934,773,000 554J57,000 73•g 724•4 , 2072 20,773 7,009.570,000 632,683,000 83•4 133•z 2013 20,845 9�8,952,000 556,t32,000 73.7 720.8 , zo74 20,866 $07,687,000 576,707,00o b�.g 706.7 _ ._ 2015 21,571 787.739.000 499,155,000 63•4 ! 100.0 � __._. 2076 2�,367 768,777,000 486,605,000 62.4 � 98.6 ' Average 75.3 721.2 Unmetered Water Use As in all water systems,some of the water the JWC purchases from Minneapolis is never sold to water system customers.The difference between the water produced and the water sold is referred to as unmetered water. It can result from many factors, including unidentified leaks in the storage and distribution system,water main breaks, periodic fire hydrant flushing,fire-fighting and training, unmetered hockey rink flooding, municipal pool uses, storage tank maintenance, unauthorized use, unmetered services, and inaccurate meters.Golden Valley's unmetered water use is estimated by comparing the average annua)water purchased from the City of Minneapolis with the average annual metered consumption of Golden Valley customers. From 20�2-2o�b, unmetered water use has ranged from 9 to�2 percent of the total water purchased from Minneapolis.The JWC's goal is to maintain unaccounted-for water use at or be- low 9 percent of Minneapolis water purchases. Unmetered water use below�o percent is considered acceptable for normal system leakage, unbilled water uses,and meter inaccuracies. Planned meter replacements and regular calibration, leak detection surveys,and maintenance programs will improve measurement of water use and help identify if there is a water loss problem. In 20�2,the JWC purchased and installed new intake meters for the Golden Valley reservoirs.The JWC also works with the City of Minneapolis to calibrate water supply meters regularly. Future plans call for effluent meters at the Golden Valley reservoirs to more accurately measure water leaving the reservoir site and entering the distribution system. Future Water Consumption Water use projections(see Table 9•4)are based on the following assumptions: • continued stable or slightly increasing population in accordance with the Metropolitan Council's projections • reduced per capita water consumption due to enhanced water conservation efforts • a maximum day to average day water demand ratio of�.85(based on statistics from 20�2-2o�b) • adequacy of the existing water supply for meeting projected water demands through 20�7 and be-yond(based on the demand projections) _ . - . - - � . . ' Per Capita Maximum Annual ' Projected Average Day , Year population Residential Use(MG) Day Use Water Use Use(GPCD) (MGj (MGaI) 2i,2oo 2078 75 �•59 2•94 580 2079 21,250 74 1.57 2.90 573 2020 2�,300 ' 73 �.55 j 2.87 566 i ZOZ7 21,q00 — 72 7.54 ( 2.85 56Z — I —; 2022 2�,500 -- 7� � 1.53 2.83 _� 558 2os3 2t,boo 70 ' i.5t 2.79 557 so24 2i,7oo 70 �.52 2•8� 555 2025 2�,800 70 �•53 2•83 558 -- , � 20Z6 2�,qoo 70 1.53 ' 2.83 558 : -— — : � —r 2027 ' 27,900 70 ' 7.53 2.83 558 Reducing residential and commercial water consumption provides several benefits. It reduces reliance on vulnerable resources, it reduces the amount of water that must be purchased,and it directly reduces the cost of water service. The City of Golden Valley and the JWC have established the following water conservation objectives: • Limit per capita residential demand to 7o gallons per capita per day(GPCD),which is the Twin Cities metro median • Limit peak daily demand to less than�.85 times average daily demand • Limit total peak daily JWC purchases from Minneapolis to less than��.4 million gallons per day(MGD) • Limit unaccounted-for water to less than 9 percent These objectives meet or exceed those set forth in the Phase I interim report to the Minnesota Legislature by the Metropolitan Council as part of the Regional Water Supply Plan currently in development. By meeting these objectives,the City of Golden Valley and the JWC can postpone development of new water supply facilities,avoid surcharges imposed by Minneapolis, reduce the impact of a short-term emergency or longer term drought,and decrease operating costs. Reducing excessive discretionary summer residential water demand is a primary objective. Residential demands comprise 62 percent of total water use.The JWC's�o-year goal will be to maintain residential per capita use at 70 GPCD. Reducing excessive discretionary summer commercial water demand is also a primary objective, particularly water use related to commercial landscape irrigation.The JWC's goal is to re-duce commercial peak water demands through public education and other programs. Emergency Preparedness The JWC has installed three emergency wells that draw water from the Prairie du Chien/Jordan aquifer. Infrastructure was put in place in preparation for a fourth well in Golden Valley if future needs warrant the additional well. In an emergency,the JWC would use these resources to augment or replace the existing Minneapolis supply. If the JWC were to experience an interruption in the Minneapolis water supply,or any distribution lines to the Crystal or Golden Valley reservoir, it would rely upon the emergency wells,which were installed in 20�4• The emergency wells provide flows that meet the average day demand. Prior to 20�4,the JWC could only rely on 3�•5 million gallons of operating storage within the Crystal and Golden Valley reservoirs.There were two instances,one in 20�3 and one in 20�4 where service was interrupted due to a watermain break on the 36-inch PCCP distribution line that runs through Robbinsdale to the Crystal reservoir.That watermain has since been replaced, but as a result of the two large breaks and as part of that project, emergency procedures were fine tuned to prepare for large disruptions to the system. The JWC has also installed backup generators at the Crystal and Golden Valley pump houses to ensure power is available for the pumps to distribute water into the system in the event of a power outage. �r��t� _- �. To comply with Minnesota Statutes,which require a water supply ;t. plan be adopted as a component of the Public Facilities Plan,the � � JWC prepared a Water Supply, Emergency and Conservation , Plan.The plan was also submitted to the Metropolitan Council as � ' an amendment to the loca)comprehensive plan for communities �b with municipal water supplies in the seven-county Twin Cities metropolitan area. � � .� ; I � � The JWC and the City of Golden Valley have policies and � � ` procedures in place in the event of a water emergency.Critical ��( ' �� x � , customers and highest users were identified to ensure service is ; �"`'�' ^� provided during conditions that require reduced water service. ��` t � � .�� ' ' � , �. Emergency situations include drought,flood,tomado, loss of ' , = r; ,, ' supply,or contamination of the Mississippi River.The emergency � �; backup wells and inter-connections with neighboring Cities greatly reduce the risk of a water shortage during a potential emergency ^- situation. � �� f ' , + The water tower is a focal point of the community The JWC and the City of Golden Valley have identified critical customers and highest users in preparation for an Emergency Plan to follow during conditions that require reduced water service. Emergency situations include drought, flood,tornado,or contamination of the Mississippi River.The emergency backup wells and inter-connections with neighboring Cities greatly reduce the risk of a water shortage during a potential emergency situation. Wastewater The Golden Valley sanitary sewer collection system is part of the overall Minneapolis-Saint Paul Regional wastewater collection and treatment system program,which is managed and operated by the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services(MCES).The MCES is required under state and federal requirements to insure all wastewater throughout the Twin Cities Metropolitan area does not leave their interceptors and is properly treated before discharge to local receiving streams.Treatment of wastewater is provided by the MCES at the Metro Plant in St. Paul. MCES collection interceptors extend through the community east to west(Bassett Creek interceptor)and north to south(St. Louis Park interceptor)to collect and transport a large portion of the City wastewater.The average daily flow from Golden Valley to the MCES system is approximately 2.35 million gallons per day(MGD). The local sanitary collection system is jointly owned under private ownership and the City of Golden Valley.Sanitary sewage is collected in over 113 miles of City owned and maintained sewer pipe ranging in sizes from 8-inches to 36- inches in diameter. Figures 5.5 and 5.6 show the sanitary sewer system in terms of(ocation,size,material,and ownership. System Conditions and Needs Much of the City of Golden Valley's wastewater system was installed prior to�q7o.Over eighty-six(86)percent of the � „ wastewater infrastructure is over fifty(50)years old with �" x f r more than half of that total more than sixty(bo)years old.An �, �; ' � '`��` �'��`� �,,x�'�''� inventory of pipe based on the material and age of the pipe is "� �4;{;�� :'��'�� . �� shown in the appendix of this Chapter.The infrastructure is �,�,4 .� � ,,�, ,,��:.. R. t'I -.�� ' j�F'�'y�y, `, '4 I . �.'�'M � �~.�at�b��'�/ reaching the end of its typical useful life.Through various n� {*�;� t :" ,.c-�, ''�' f,a studies,scans,flow monitoring,and emergency repairs,it is � � s;,.' �W � apparent t hat t he wastewate r in frastructure nee ds repairs $ - z�::�,*��*''��' and rehabilitation.As the wastewater system ages,the pipes `�� ' 'f `�`� �`�TM��`''�� ;=�>; and structures underground crack and break,allowing ground � ;,-`„ �; -�:'�r" ' ..;a. water to enter the system.Groundwater is clean water and � '�:` ` � ,�. ,` does not need to be treated at a wastewater lant.This inflow `� " � � ` p �� s. � �"�'a .��. '� and infiltration(I/I)takes precious wastewater flow space and '� �.''�` � J �� •� _ . . �� .. ��,� r �. results in extra fees to the residents of Golden Valley.Years �"�� ;�.� - of maintenance and clear water from I I enterin the ' - = " �`r"z��,'�� / g �, - .t�,, . ' �' '�*�� -�= collection system will reduce the overall service life of the " _ , l ;�' �,�k , �, � • � � existing infrastructure. Regular maintenance has been ��„ � _`, ,.� �','�+�.G ,;;, �.4, ir�,��,;` performed, including pipe lining,asset scanning for condition N/ater main installation in Golden Valley status,but not enough to keep up with the aging system.To continue to provide sufficient wastewater capacity to the residents,a dedicated push to repair and rehabilitate the wastewater must be done.A programmed lining project can increase the life span of older pipes as well as reduce the amount of I/I entering the wastewater system.Without continued maintenance and renewal,costs to the City will increase. Increased costs are due to emergency repairs,surcharge fees,and collapsing infrastructure resulting from cracks and breaks in the system. It is time to push for infrastructure renewal to maintain the integrity and function of the system. The system contains almost 7o miles of pipe classified as Vitrified Sewer Pipe(VSP)or Vitrified Clay Pipe(VCP). Aging VCP is commonly associated with I/I problems due to the number of pipejoints in the system.The number of joints also adds to its susceptibility to root intrusion.The majority of VCP pipe was installed in Golden Valley prior to the mid�97o's.The City has developed a Pavement Management Program (PMP),which includes a review of all utilities during the process of updating the City's streets.The program includes an inspection of the sanitary sewer collection system in the public right of way and a voluntary program of sewer lateral inspections on private property. Through sanitary sewer closed-circuit television inspection(CCTV)and evaluation of older sewer pipe in the public right of way,much of which is VCP sewer,the City has developed a successfu) rehabilitation program for its aging infrastructure using relining or pipe replacement techniques. Nowever,significant portions of the City had streets reconstructed prior to implementation of the sanitary sewer as part of the PMP.Therefore,these areas have significant rehabilitation needs in the public and private systems. Figure 5.5:Sanitary Sewer System by Ownership ! � � � �I � � 1100 �1 } I � t � A ! � i� ; Medicine Lake Rd � � �„_l`u— -` �.. � ! . ._.. wv� ,a� � ; ., . v �_ �� ; 4 4 ��: � r �__ � ,, �� ° � .,N 769 ��. . ` u � olden Val ' _ ( - ,�ti �St � � > �' w, � � ��,� , .;..� T,�'�. � i ,':� � �0., + i � c H , _ „ , . � .-� r� . � `x �� y � ...,,�1� �.. .�.:,� �: P.," CR- �I � e yO �� L » �'�axd."�.r � ��'. �OU. � , a :: .[' � r . ti .. �.__ i y_�.� • � �/` -�. , � r .� .� , �-�� '��I , � 4 � � �Schap+e� �,, ` 55 �1. , H�i55 � `g5' „ � �� wooastock i ` > � �r ,� y� , �, a �a� � ;�..� �� Av.e I _ Q � � I ; ��:�� '�� .�� -' �� , - �en�+° � _.�._.�,. , � d�. � � � �� '. . ��.�J 169 c, � , � 700 � i � ,fiF:, ,,.�: � . . . ._ . `�' �� , I , ..,�,..� . 1 � � " ' ._ _ - , � �- , � ...`.__..�_..�__.._.---• - J � -, , ' �! � _— f �..j "�" � � � �" �� Xn� Sanitary Main by Ownership � MCES Forcemain City Forcemain � MCES LiFt Station � MCES Flow Meter ' MCES Gravity City Gravity � City Lift Station 0 0.25 0.5 i Mile I � 1 � 1 Sources:Nennepi�County Surveyors Office for Property Lines(20�7),City of Golden Valley for all other layers(2ot7). Figure 5.6: Sanitary Sewer System by Material ! � !� �� i, � :� ,00;,, �� t i � gI '- i ! � �� - � j � Medicine Lake Rd � vi':t ' � � � � � � � ' �..�' I '\ �.tr " � �. , L�.. � , !_� , , �i,u� ,,,'.i S , � � � . ' �...I �y _. _•. � __.. _ . .: g "� � . . YJ$ t � . . . . i y y ' #^ � . •s' �,' � 169 "`� '� r � � �� ,a " u1�' � �z �{ n Val �-" ;, � ___ � St ' � « � �sS � �. . :i :......,� ° � � �°�:,� e � ..,. `� �*-`s" � � > � 'r' � � ["� � f .�rao F �, r '0 _ _ �n.,: „�., ' '*"` % T� � �� r �� 0. , � � ., .... �_. C .. __ ._ ._ N „' . '} , .. ;,.,..«: ., "C� 1 � � , �, � ( �'"^� . .y� � �p ".'?� ��'� �� -� � � ( _ �..�� ,k ��. � �� I , � � r, ,,,�1 - � _� , �-. ; . � , � �, , � �. � � �, _._ , . � �'" � - , a �� `" �< , � �� ` .,_ � �� x U � . 5$ � �� *�%AL.-.l�-. .. . ,! •- x`� � $rJ � ' � __, � �� , =' �..�/� + � '" W ��+1 ; � , pvel �� o a � / �1 � �,o i ------�,., .� . �._:�; :� _ ��e" i a , x $ ts r , 769 � � � � � . �� _�.�� , � � , � �" � � � � r .a � � F � �,...a�oo , � � �� ' �, .� :,�� - i � � ; .�. %�,�.�� . �� ,�,,�- �� f 1._ y -,�„ � ; �_. i , � � . �� . , .., _._._.----• - ; '' : r.; - x ..' L � Y + r1�) , ; � --- _ , . �r � . ..,-� , 1 _ --f" Sanitary Main by Material �Y---� VCP-Vitrified Clay Pipe(generally over So years old) -"i3 RCP,CIP,ICP,LJR and PCCP(generally over so years old) PVC,DIP,NDPE,and Cured Liner(generally under So years) G 025 O.5 1 Mile I � 1 i 1 Sources:Nennepin County Surveyors Office for Property Lines{2oi7),City of Golden Valley for al)other layers(2ot7). The portion of the sanitary sewer collection system on private property is similar to the public VCP sewer mains, in that there is a significant number of sanitary sewer laterals using VCP materials with the potential to experience similar maintenance problems and contribute I/L There are an �� > estimated�47 miles of private service lines,which exceeds the City �v �': sewer system by 35 miles, making up approximately 55��0 of the total '� sewer system.Thus,the City has adopted a voluntary sewer latera) inspection and repair program as part of the pavement management '�k ' : � - �. ��' � '' program and a mandatory point of sale program to address these , � <� ,=� r issues on private property as well. a � � �-*-�,,;" �, j ,° �, � i '$� �i 4 's.+—<� .�'* j „�' �..•Y�,. �.,�}c..' �-t .-r'"�s:��/. . . +�'�'�.. Inflow and Infiltration ,� ` <�.,�;�� .,��'"' ` � '� It is the City's goal to reduce inflow and infiltration(I/I)to a � `�' �s ' �"r � �.��' manageable level to maintain and reserve wastewater capacity ��-��ry��;`�: g'' '�� q.�'� �� , ,-�"�:,� within Golden Valley for future development and reduce operation ��, '°' �,.. �.� ` ' - .t� ��'" ��f��`'- �: and maintenance each year.The City of Golden Valley,like the many �: �'��`.�`�:�`,� '�"�� p � � ,,,�:�#�.� V�°" communities in the metropolitan area, has spent considerable time ,,,�� , :"� ' �� and ener mana in I/I within their sanitar sewer collection � ;'� � �� ` `�< �'`�� gY � g Y � � s. �,�`-� �V r , system.The MCES has implemented a surcharge program,which is �"`,'�" °��' " •�-�;��-"Y �� '"'�w '�� a u designed to encourage metropolitan communities to reduce inflow :�'�� ` '� - s `` �� ,,` entering their interceptors in order to preserve wastewater capacity i;'� � �� "� � '^� � � for daily domestic dry weather demand flows from municipalities �� ' �" `'��'- �`�`��'�` � they serve around the Twin Cities metro area. Prior to 2003,the ��;,,� .,,�� ` �d= �`��;� �`-- ,,�, ,��'�. Golden Valley sanitary collection system had a history of ineasuring � �� ' '� `�� high peak wastewater flow rates during rainfall events.As a result of �` '� ` ��`` ` �"` �� the MCES Surcharge Program, peak wastewater flow rates above Sanitary main failure requires maintenance MCES allowances were identified during rainfall events in September and October of 2005.After further studies were conducted,the City committed to an I/I abatement program to manage and reduce their wastewater contributions to the MCES interceptors. Over the past twelve years,the City of Golden Valley has taken an aggressive approach to reducing the impact of I/I on their collection system. It has been successful in reducing peak wastewater flow discharges during rainfall events. Following a preliminary assessment through flow monitoring,the City implemented a private property inspection program.The inspection program consisted of two parts,a voluntary program through the City's street reconstruction project and a mandatory program through property sales(Point of Sale). Prior to the program during the spring of 2003, permanent flow meters operated by the MCES recorded peak wastewater flow rates exceeding�9 million gallons per day(mgd).A typical dry weather day would record only 3 mgd on average. In 20�4.after eight years of the program,a similar event with high (evels of precipitation in the spring recorded less than half the peak wastewater flow rate at the same MCES flow meter location. Although the inspection program has been very successful,due to the structure of the program, many of the private properties addressed have been more focused on the eastern side of the Golden Valley where more of the street reconstruction programs have been completed.City efforts continue to reduce the negative impact on the system resulting from I/I.The City will remain committed to I/I reduction as it makes the transition from the Pavement Management Program (PMP)to the Infrastructure Renewal Program(IRP). City efforts continue to reduce the stress on the system resulting from I/I.The City has upgraded the sanitary sewer collection system during many street reconstruction projects. In addition,a sewer lining project has been implemented along Laurel Avenue to reduce potential I/I in a high groundwater area and maintain pipe capacity along the I-394 corridor.City staff continues to perform maintenance and inspection on the sanitary sewer mains in the public right of way including sewer CCTV, electro scan testing and pipe (ining to reduce I/I in critical areas of the City under high groundwater conditions and/or structural defects with the potential for future maintenance and I/I issues.The City has been successful in locating and repairing illegal connections to the wastewater conveyance system. Illegal connections include foundation drains or basement sump discharging to the sanitary sewer.As of fall 2otb,the City repaired 3�o illegal sump and/or foundation drains throughout the City. Lift Stations The City's wastewater sanitary sewer system contains three sewage lift stations:Schaper, Nighway 55,and Woodstock. Figure 5•5 displays the location of each station throughout the City. The capacity and physical condition at each station has been inspected in order to identify deficiencies and to establish a priority for improvements to the stations.The study recommended improvements to hydraulic capacity, pumping capacity, physical condition,electrical issues,instrumentation/control,and sewer back-up prevention.All lift stations have recommended improvements of varying degrees that should be included in future planning.Table 5•5 ranks the condition of each station against the nine general parameters,based.The detailed review for each of the three stations is contained in the appendix of this chapter. _ . - � Station Name Shaper Highway 55 Woodstock , � ; _ , __ , Hydraulic Capacity 3 i 4 3 Sefety 4 _ 3 _ 3 Potential Backup 2 3 2 Pump 4 - - 4 3 _ _ _ Station Condition - __ _ Wet Well 7 3 3 - Valve Well 3 2 3 ' Electrical � _ 2 _ 2 2 - - . _ Instrumention/Control ', 3 3 3 _. — - --- ,__---_ ------------ Location 3 ' 5 2 Total 25 � � 27 24 j Average Acceptability ' Points 2.78 3.22 + 2.67 �_ � Keynote-Acceptability Rating=�to 5 _ _ 1 Excellent s Better than Average 3 Average 4 Below Average __ __ -...._ 5 Unacceptable ___ ___ _____._. Work is still needed on lift station repair and rehabilitation.One lift station in particular,at Nighway 55, is strongly recommended to be prioritized for evaluation and reconstruction.The lift station currently sits in the floodplain and has been impacted by flood waters in the past. During large rain events, it becomes necessary to place sand bags around the station. If not reconstructed out of the floodplain,the I-lighway 55 lift station will have a negative environmental impact should a flood event cause the station to backup or overflow. It is located in a very visible (ocation near Sweeney Lake,Theodore Wirth Regional Park,and the Sweeney Lake branch of Bassett Creek.The City plans to address that as soon as fiscally possible. In the meantime,the City will install a grinder pump in the station to reduce the issues caused by flushable wipes and other materials. It is important that the City maintain an active preventive maintenance program for each station.The program should consist of two parts: actions performed on a twice weekly basis and actions performed annually.A SCADA system would provide more complete recording with less City staff time. Nowever,the City Utilities staff documents lift station condition and maintenance needs.With the City's significant GIS database and the current detail in lift station maintenance it is recommended that the City consider implementation of a GIS compatible maintenance record system. Future Demands The City is committed to providing adequate capacity to insure wastewater collected for treatment does not leave the Golden Valley sanitary collection system causing a Sanitary Sewer Overflow(SSO). Future development in the core industria) and commercial areas may require the City to evaluate the need for their main collection pipes to be upsized. Due to increased growth and changes in development, certain stretches of wastewater piping may be found to be undersized and impact the City's goals for their infrastructure. Undersized pipes can cause backups in high flow events which result in costly repairs to individual residents and businesses as well as the City as a whole.The sanitary sewer model is an effective tool to determine if future development will impact pipe capacity resulting in undersized pipes and the potential to limit future Golden Valley growth. The population of the City of Golden Valley is projected to increase 7-8��a over the next 2o years. Metropolitan Council projects Golden Valley population of 22,90o by the year 2040.The most significant change in Golden Valley's population will be the result of increased density from changing land use. In order to provide the City and the MCES with existing and future planning information,the existing sewer system was evaluated using a hydraulic flow simulation model, MWN Soft InfoSWMM.This model was used to route sewer flows through the developed sewer structure of pipes, manholes, and (ift stations.The model calculates various hydraulic parameters during normal flow,surcharge, backflow,flooding and pumping conditions. For the purpose of the analysis, parcel acres were multiplied by the sanitary load rate per the assigned land use and then assigned to manholes located closest to parcel center that were considered likely to receive those flows. Sanitary land use loading rates were initially used to determine base flow rates throughout the City. Once the loading rates were assigned, overall flow volumes from each sewer district were calibrated against historical metered data,and loading rates were modified so that flow from each district mirrored actual flow data.The City's existing GIS sewer structure data, as-built information from the City's sewer construction plan sheets, lift station information and lift station inspections were compiled into a G15 database to configure the model. in order to determine future wastewater flow projections, properties anticipated to have changing land use were adjusted in the model to account for increases or decreases in overall wastewater flow rates due to the anticipated change in land use over the next 2o years.The City's future land use map for 204o is provided in the Land Use Chapter of this Plan.The model is used to evaluate current and future sewer capacities and required system improvements. The results of the InfoSWMM model indicate that the system should be capable of conveying ADFs without any capacity issues. Future development opportunities in critical areas where pipe capacity could potentially be an issue especially along the I-Iwy 55 and I-3q4 corridor can be evaluated to determine how and if land use changes will impact existing sanitary sewer infrastructure.The success of the I/I program has been reflected in an updated sanitary sewer model by adjusting peak wastewater flow rates and allowing more reserve pipe capacity for potential development. The outlet on the east side of the City(owned by MCES)does exhibit some pipe capacity issues,shown on the figure. During 2ot4,the MCES allowable peak hourly flow rate for the City of Golden Valley was 7.qb MGD.The surcharge storm was used in modeling and analysis to analyze a more intense storm,with higher flow volumes in the sanitary system.The previous areas know for flow capacity issues no longer exist,due to the work of the I/I reduction, private property inspections and overall decreased water use by the City. One small area with capacity issues is located at Golden Valley Road between Bassett Creek Drive and Bonnie Lane. In this location,a�2-inch segment connects to a 36-inch segment,only o.3-feet above the invert of the 36-inch segment.The�2-inch segment does back up due to higher flows in the 36-inch segment. A similar situation occurs at Sweeney Lake and Nidden Lakes Parkway where an 8-inch segment connects to a 36-inch segment at the manhole invert,causing backup into the 8-inch segment. The area of Bassett Creek, between Legend Drive and Noble Avenue North also shows capacity restrictions.This is a section where a City gravity line discharges into an MCES gravity line. The positive results from aggressive I/I reduction have reduced capacity issues in the sanitary system.The tasks and projects the City has undertaken to reduce I/I in the system has been proven as working and will continue. I-lowever, I/I still exists in the system.The City and MCES are paying to treat clean water. Persistent work will continue lowering costs to the City from backups and surcharge events. Proactive work will reduce emergencies in the future. More work will be done to remove I/I from the system to allow for more capacity and growth. Continual work will improve life of residents of Golden Valley by maintaining water quality with the reduction of wastewater overflows and backups, lowering wastewater costs to each resident,and improve the local economy by promoting future growth and development. Operations and Maintenance Plan The operations and maintenance plan serves as a guide to operate, monitor, maintain, and rehabilitate the City's sanitary sewer system. In order to reduce claims against the City, comply with local and regional standards, and reduce costs,the City plans to: • Rehabilitating system components with concerns related to safety and welfare of City residents and employees • Rehabilitating system components to improve system effectiveness • Implementing programs to periodically evaluate system condition • Develop or expand maintenance programs to help ensure periodic maintenance of the sewer system • Establishing policies and ordinances to protect the City's sewer infrastructure • Determining equipment and staffing needs of the City Golden Valley Public Works has developed over the years as infrastructure additions warranted additional staff and equipment. Public Works staff, management staff and the elected officials of the community have worked together to develop an efficient staff that is cross-trained in various other aspects of duties assigned to all of public Works. City Maintenance staff has divided the City into three sewer service districts to manage maintenance activities in the system.The City aggressively inspects and/or cleans 4o miles of sewer each year, equating to inspecting/cleaning one third(i/3)of the City each year, in addition to the areas needing emergency cleaning.The City has sufficient sewer maintenance equipment to maintain its municipal sewer system.There may be times when additional needs require contracting for services. Maintaining the current equipment mix, in combination with proper maintenance and rotation of equipment in/out of service,will likely serve the community in an efficient manner for many years.The City does have televising equipment as part of its jetting equipment.The equipment is best used to inspect sewers as they are cleaned to help ensure that al) debris have been removed.Staffing(evels for public works utility staff seem apprapriate. Nowever,the City will evaluate the prioritization process and assign a higher level of importance to the maintenance of the sewer system.The current staff level combined with the current prioritization process creates a situation that makes it extremely challenging to accomplish the goals outlined in this report, in addition to regular maintenance duties. Utility maintenance staff indicates that a significant portion of its time and budget is used in areas constructed of VCP. This is a result of root intrusion,cracked and broken pipe, poorjoints and poor seals between pipes in this type of pipe.This is not unique to the City of Golden Valley and is typical of VCP throughout the metro area. Many communities have (ined or replaced VCP sewer to eliminate the high maintenance needs often associated with these types of sewers.The City has undertaken projects to line the VCP sewers,through the Pavement Management Program (PMP)as well as other sewer rehabilitation projects,but to reduce the strain and work for the sewer maintenance staff,a more aggressive lining program should be considered. Maintenance in the sewer system typically involves cleaning the sewer using a combination of jetter and vactor trucks to remove debris from the sewer pipes. Root intrusion in joints of the pipe requires cutting and removal to remove obstructions in the pipe and allow flow of the sewage through the system.Once roots begin to enter sewers, it is very difficult to eliminate the recurring growth.The simple cutting of roots often promotes additional growth. Unmanaged root growth can also cause the VCP pipe to crack,impacting the integrity of the pipe.Cracked pipes allow groundwater and soil into the sewer system,which can cause road collapses and sewer blockages.The continued efforts to cut roots in the VCP portions of the system annually results in other portions of the City's sewer system having a lower priority for maintenance. The League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust(LMCIT) provides insurance coverage for the City to protect against claims resulting from sewer backups and other claims that may result from problems related to the City's utility services. �MCIT also provides no-fault insurance for private sewer connection to owners whose sewers cause damage to the City's municipal system. LMCIT have noted increased claims in specific areas of sewer systems throughout the state.One item of note is VCP sewers having higher than normal claims.They have suggested a cleaning of VCP sewer pipes every three years.Golden Valley has a practice of televising all Pavement , `-� ''�-',, Management Program (PMP)areas and `' Y ' rehabilitating all sub-standard sewers in conjunction with its PMP each year.This , � � ,`' equates to approximately one to two miles of r ,, ,,. ,� � � ' lined pipe and an additional two to five miles of `"" Tso F°`"; televised pipe per year.The City is currently i � planning for a ful) reconstruct of all areas to be / complete by 2023, pending no issues with ' water mains and sanitary sewers. Because of � .. `" � �— the high percentage of VCP pipe comprising = -� � ,..Y... ^oq;:.. the sewer system in Golden Valley,those ---�' portions of the system should be more closely evaluated for replacement or lining to negate � i, � the concerns of root intrusion and to continue ,� *�;i� � r��;``.�> the maintenance schedule suggested by f" �IIMA�IMMM� LMCIT. _,. �,�4,.. � . µa�� Proper monitoring and maintenance of the Sanitary sewer jetting existing system is an important factor in the (ong-term viability of the system. Maintaining the system extends the life of the system and decreases the likelihood of sewer backups.Sewer backups often lead to property damage claims against the City.This results in increased costs to the City to pay those claims with associated increases in insurance premiums. It is recommended to create a program for total system cleaning,televising and rehabilitation to ensure the system lasts and to reduce potential expenses from collapsed/broken sewers or other backups that result from deferred maintenance. Documentation of condition of VCP gravity segments is recommended to be prioritized first,due to the known issues of VCP, but it also is recommended for a full system condition baseline and regular maintenance program. It is recommended that Golden Valley establish a televising program to televise all sewers.This would establish a "base line"televising database for all sewers in the community.The televising records, currently stored separately,will soon be digitally attached to City GIS to provide a tool available to maintenance and engineering personnel. The City has already established a practice of televising sewers in areas where street rehabilitation or reconstruction is scheduled to occur.This allows the City to be efficient with infrastructure management and to avoid situations that require removing portions of a newly constructed street. Contracts for new sewer construction should include the televising of the new sewer.A copy of the televising should be provided to the City at the end of the project.Televising provides baseline information for the sewer and validates service locations. Restaurant grease has also become an issue in some areas of the system. Maintenance activities have already been increased in known problem areas.Golden Valley cleans the problem areas in the spring and fall and spot checks and flushes problematic manholes on a weekly and monthly schedule.With increased development in certain areas of the City,restaurant grease has been a growing problem, requiring more time and attention from Maintenance staff.There have been some efforts to modify ordinances and policies regarding the installation, maintenance,and inspection of grease traps. In 20�5,an ordinance was adopted to require all Food Service Facilities(FSFs)that produce fats,oils and grease to install grease collection devices.This should be monitored and promoted to reduce the amount of grease in the system. POLICY PLAN The Policy Plan for this Chapter includes a set of long-term goals and objectives that will be fulfilled through specific actions and policy decisions.The Policy Plan is a long-range document that expresses the values of the community and establishes a vision. It provides direction and guidance for the future of the City in terms of policymaking, improvements, programs, investments, priorities,and work plans. It can be utilized for decision-making purposes by elected officials,commissions, boards,staff,and other interested members of the community.The Policy Plan is updated every�o years based on new data and community feedback as required by Minnesota law. Creating a comprehensive plan in today's uncertain and rapidly evolving world requires preparing for a new climate and weather reality,advancing technologies, and shifting social structures. Golden Valley has already taken several steps to improve its water resources. Golden Valley has identified the importance of building on its previous efforts to become more resilient. Goal �: Sustain arid Improve Water Quality The quality of water resources is vital to the health,safety,and prosperity of current and future members of the community. Objectives 1. Sustain a healthy drinking water supply 1.1 Continue to purchase water from the City of Minneapolis in partnership with the Joint Water Commission (JWC),which has provided a safe and reliable source of drinking water for several decades 7.2 Implement best management practices (BMPs)to protect groundwater quality �. Improve quality of surface water 2.7 Achieve BCMWC and MPCA water quality standards in City lakes and streams to preserve beneficial uses 2.z Achieve pollutant (oad reductions as required by the state or watershed management organizations �•3 Minimize hydrologic alterations to Bassett Creek 2.4 Minimize erosion and sedimentation to protect the city's water resources �•5 Implement soil protection and sedimentation controls whenever necessary to maintain public health,safety, and welfare 3. Improve quality and reduce quantity of stormwater runoff 3•7 Minimize pollutant loading from storm water runoff through non-point source reduction and treatment 3•� Minimize the rate and volume of storm water runoff entering Bassett Creek 3•3 Comply with all applicable storm water regulations established by the Federal Government,the State of Minnesota, Nennepin County,the BCWMC,the MCWD,and the Metropolitan Council Goal 2: Protect and Enhance Aquatic Resources Aquatic resources and their ecological benefits are an integral part of the environment. Objectives 7. Preserve and enhance the quantity and quality of wetlands 7.� Develop wetland performance standards 7.2 Continue to require wetland delineation with development proposals and require developers to maximize buffer zones around wetlands where possible 7•3 Continue to develop wetland banking credits within the wetland bank as opportunities arise 7•4 Coordinate with other agencies, as necessary,that are also involved in the protection of wetlands 2. Protect and restore natural areas, including fish and wildlife habitats 2.7 Support the goals and policies of the City's Natural Resources Management Plan and reference this plan when reviewing development proposals s.2 Utilize an adaptive management approach to protection, preservation,and enhancement of natural areas 2.3 Increase the amount of native vegetation cover including pollinator habitat 3. Maintain and enhance the integrity and ecological function of shoreland areas 4•7 Continue to enforce shoreland zoning regulations 4•� Support the voluntary development and maintenance of buffers of native and naturally existing shoreline vegetation on non-city property 4•3 Encourage landowners to protect non-disturbed shoreland areas and restore disturbed shorelines and streambanks located on private property to their natural state where feasible Goal 3: Reduce the Risk and Impact of Floods It is imperative that flood risk be reduce in order to protect lives, homes, businesses,and infrastructures from flood damage. Objectives 1. Minimize the risk of flooding along Bassett Creek, its tributaries,and other flood prone areas 7.� Manage development and redevelopment throughout the watershed to minimize the risk of flooding 7.2 Maintain and repair the Flood Control Project system 7.3 Regulate stormwater runoff discharges and volumes to minimize flood risk,flood damages,and the future costs of stormwater management systems 7•4 Identify and implement additional projects to reduce flood risk along the Bassett Creek trunk system 7.5 Conduct flood proofing on homes remaining in the floodplain as feasible 7.6 Allow only those land uses in the BCWMC-established floodplain that will not be damaged by floodwaters or increase flooding 7.7 Discourage development where the sole access to the site is through the established �oo-year floodplain Goal 4: Maintain and Rehabilitate Infrastructure Infrastructure renewal must be addressed in order to maintain the integrity and function of essential services for future generations. Objectives 7. Conduct proactive maintenance and rehabilitation on critical services to improve functionality and effectiveness 7.1 Develop or expand programs to help ensure periodic maintenance of the sewer system 7.2 Continually evaluate the condition of water infrastructure and system performance 7•3 Continue to reduce the inflow and infiltration of clear water into sanitary sewer system 7•4 Continue to explore and incorporate new and emerging technologies to construct, rehabilitate, maintain and manage public assets and infrastructure in an efficient,cost effective manner 2. Ensure that new infrastructure is built to be resilient 2.7 Integrate multi-benefit green infrastructure into public capital projects 2.� Consider emerging climate patterns when designing stormwater infrastructure Z.3 Design infrastructure to minimize environmental and public health impacts 2.4 Develop strategies to fund infrastructure renewal �•5 Include life cycle costs(e.g.operations and maintenance, resource consumption,disposal)when planning projects and selecting construction materials Goal 5: Ensure Capacity of Systems Meet Future Needs In order to provide essentia!services for future generations, the City must plan for changes and needs in the future. Objectives 7. Research future needs of the community and assess the condition of all critical services to determine capacity deficiencies 7.� Ensure that land use decisions reflect the opportunities and limitations of existing or planned infrastructure 7.2 Utilize future growth forecasts in population, households,and employment to ensure adequate system capacity �•3 Work with the JWC to construct emergency well if deemed necessary to meet community needs Goal 6: Balance Water Usage and Conservation The City must reduce water consumption in a manner that minimizes financial impact. Objectives 7. Reduce water consumption in the community 7.1 Limit per capita residential demand for water and 7.2 Limit peak daily demand for water and total peak daily purchases of water from Minneapolis 7•3 Limit unaccounted-for water in the system 7•4 Manage active and ongoing water meter replacement repair and testing programs 7•5 Avoid unnecessary water consumption associated with excessive hydrant flushing 1.6 Maintain an active water conservation public education program �.7 Consider new water pricing schemes that could reduce water consumption Goal 7: Involve and Educate the Public in Water Resource Management It is important that the community is enabled with knowledge and tools to improve the environment. Objectives 1. Increase public awareness of individual property owner's impacts on water quality 7.� Maintain the Golden Valley Environmental Commission to educate residents, raise awareness about environmental responsibility,and create a sense of collaboration in the spirit of making and keeping Golden Valley an environmentally healthy city 1.2 Use demonstration projects as a means of educating the public on water resource issues and opportunities 7•3 Assist other agencies in the development and distribution of educational materials 2. Build community capacity to implement stormwater best management practices at a local level 2.1 Utilize volunteer groups to the greatest extent possible for public service projects 2.2 Maintain a public education program to develop and distribute educational materials on stormwater issues through a variety of inedia 2•3 Perform outreach activities that inform the community about the impacts of stormwater discharges on water bodies and best practices to promote watershed health �.4 Work with other agencies to develop an education program for schools in the city IMPLEMENTATION PLAN The Implementation Plan for this Chapter includes a set of specific actions to accomplish the goals and objectives set forth in the Policy Plan. It differs from the Policy Plan in that it provides the opportunity to easily measure progress and note tangible outcomes from each task. Each task provides an approximate cost estimate for the work and notes a timeframe in which the specific action should take place.Tasks are prioritized based on financial feasibility,staff capacity,importance or urgency for action,and other factors.The Implementation Plan is updated every 5 years(mid- cycle of the�o year Policy Plan) based on progress and new opportunities. Sustain and Improve Water Quality The quality of water resources is vital to the health, safety,and prosperity of current and future members of the community. Implementation Strategies: • Support water quality monitoring efforts performed by other agencies and organizations • Cooperate with neighboring cities regarding wellhead protection programs and activities • Share groundwater elevation data with the BCWMC when available • Continue requiring infiltration practices be implemented in accordance with federal,state,and watershed guidelines • Implement improvement projects identified in the BCWMC's capital improvement program based on feasibility, prioritization,and available funding • Prioritize projects that are most effective at achieving water quality goals, including non-structural BM Ps and education • Implement BMPs that reduce phosphorus loading to receiving water within the MCWD by two(2) pounds per year and report progress to the MCWD Protect and Enhance Aquatic Resources Aquatic resources and their ecological benefits are an integral part of the environment. Implementation Strategies: • Update shoreland management zoning regulations to be consistent with state requirements • Implement Stormwater Management Plan and Natural Resource Management Plan. Implement the plans, monitor progress,and report on success. Ensure the implementation plan is adaptive,flexible,and adequately funded. • Develop wetland performance standards and develop wetland banking credits within the wetland bank as opportunities arise. Require developers to maximize buffer zones around wetlands where possible. • Increase the amount of native vegetation buffers that include pollinator habitat • Encourage landowners to protect non-disturbed shoreland areas and restore disturbed shorelines and streambanks located on private property to their natural state where feasible Reduce the Risk and Impact of Floods It is imperative that flood risk be reduce in order to protect lives, homes, businesses,and infrastructures from flood damage. Implementation Strategies: • Evaluate known and potential flood issues identified in these areas and pursue opportunities to minimize flood risk through capita) improvement projects,structural flood proofing,and/or purchase of at-risk structures. • Continue to implement floodplain management zoning regulations and maintain consistency with BCWMC and MCWD floodplain management policies • Design new municipal stormwater facilities based on Atlas�4 precipitation data,conveying no less than the �o-year, 24-hour rainfall event(i.e.,the event with a�o��o chance of occurring in any year) • Perform routine inspection,maintenance,and repair of BCWMC Flood Control Project(FCP)features located within the city and will formally notify the BCWMC of any maintenance and repair action on any FCP feature • Consider dedicating funds for the acquisition of homes that have less than� foot of freeboard from their lowest opening to the established�oo year flood level, or that have an access that has a portion below the�oo year flood level.Acquisition would be voluntary by the property owner. • Obtain property land dedication and easements for stormwater ponds and drainage systems with new development in order to provide permanent protection Maintain and Rehabilitate Infrastructure Infrastructure renewal must be addressed in order to maintain the integrity and function of essential services for future generations. Implementation Strategies: • Transition to the Infrastructure Renewal Program. Establish maintenance districts within the city for implementation of maintenance, preservation, and rehabilitation projects • Provide long-lerm and sustainable funding for rehabilitation and maintenance staff,equipment,and related resources to allow restoration and improvement of aged or worn infrastructure • Address infrastructure funding in the City's legislative priorities in order to encourage the state legislature to provide stable, long-term funding for capital improvements and maintenance • Continue to reduce the inflow and infiltration of clear water into sanitary sewer system through a variety of programs and redevelopment opportunities • Research ways that emerging technologies can reduce(ife cycle costs in water system construction, rehabilitation, maintenance, and management. Ensure Capacity of Systems Meet Future Needs In order to provide essential services for future generations, the City must plan for changes and needs in the future. Implementation Strategies: • Continue to incorporate infrastructure considerations with land use decisions • Monitor accuracy of growth forecasts in order to determine whether population growth could exceed infrastructure capacity in the future • Work with the JWC to monitor water supply needs. It may become necessary to construct emergency in Golden Valley in the future in order to meet community needs. Balance Water Usage and Conservation The City must reduce water consumption in a manner that minimizes financial impact. Implementation strategies: • Continue the meter maintenance program to continue improving billing accuracy and efficiency and to track water(osses. • Monitor unmetered water use by annually reviewing water billings and compare with Minneapolis metered water delivery volumes • Maintain a program of water reduction measures for emergencies. Include voluntary and mandatory requirements. • Research option for inclining water pricing tiers to reduce water demand.Seasonal rates or surcharges that increase the cost for excess water use during the summer peak usage season could also be implemented. • Adopt an ordinance governing installation and operation of commercial landscape irrigation systems. Establish minimum design standards, link approvals for system designs to overall development approvals,focus on reducing peak summer demands, minimize the wasting of water, and reduce overall landscape water consumption. • Enact an education program to inform the public of water conservation. Including how to sprinkle lawns more efficiently in order to reduce peak water demand in the summer months. Involve and Educate the Public in Water Resource Management It is important that the community is enabled with knowledge and tools to improve the environment. Implementation strategies: • Continue to conduct an annua)public meeting on stormwater to discuss the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program(SWPPP)and inform the public about stormwater impacts. • Develop a volunteer program.Work with community leaders from every neighborhood.Once established, this group can conduct(ocalized outreach and education to the public,encourage volunteerism,and coordinate within their neighborhoods. • Develop education materials about stormwater management techniques,particularly on reducing the use of chemicals that have potentially negative impacts on natural resources and human health • Cooperate with efforts of the other agencies that educate the general public regarding the importance of implementing BMPs to protect groundwater quality and quantity Summary of Implementation Actions - - • Sustain and Im rove Water Qualit Su ort water ualit monitorin efforts $ X Cooperate with neighboring cities regarding wellhead protection programs $ X and activities Share groundwater elevation data with the $ 0-5 years BCWMC Continue requiring infiltration practices be � X im lemented Implement improvement projects identified in the BCWMC's capital $$$ O-2o years im rovement ro ram Prioritize projects that are most effective at achievin water ualit oals $� 0-2o years Implement BMPs that reduce phosphorus loading to receiving water within the $$$ 0-2o years MCWD Protect and Enhance Aquatic Resources Update shoreland management zoning $ O-5 years re ulations Implement Stormwater Management Plan and Natural Resource Mana ement Plan $�� 0-2o years X Develo wetland erformance standards $ 0-5 ears Increase the amount of native vegetation buffers that include ollinator habitat �� o-�o years Encourage landowners to protect non- disturbed shoreland areas � 0-5 years Reduce the Risk and Impact of Floods Evaluate known and otential flood issues $ X Continue to implement floodplain � X mana ement zonin re ulations Design new municipal stormwater facilities � X based on Atlas�4 reci itation data Perform routine inspection, maintenance, and repair of BCWMC Flood Control $$$ X Pro'ect (FCP) features Consider dedicating funds to the purchase of homes �� 0-2o years Obtain property land dedication and � X easements Maintain and Rehabilitate Infrastructure Transition to the Infrastructure Renewal Pro ram $$$ 0-2o years Provide long-term and sustainable funding for rehabilitation and maintenance �� X Address infrastructure funding in the Cit `s le islative riorities � O-5 years Continue to reduce the inflow and infiltration of clear water into sanitary $$$ o-�o years sewer s stem Research ways that emerging technologies can reduce life c cle costs � 0-5 years Ensure Capacity of Systems Meet Future Needs Continue to incorporate infrastructure considerations with land use decisions � 0-2o years X Monitor accurac of rowth forecasts $ O-2o ears X Work with the JWC to monitor water su I needs � 0-2o years X Balance Water Usage and Conservation Continue the meter maintenance ro ram $ 0-5 ears X Monitor unmetered water use $ O-5 ears X Maintain a program of water reduction measures for emer encies � 0-5 years X Research option for inclining water pricing tiers to reduce water demand � 5-�o years Adopt an ordinance governing installation and operation of commercial landscape $ 5-�o years irri ation s stems Enact an education program to inform ublic on water conservation � O-5 years Involve and Educate the Public in Water Resource Management Continue to conduct an annual public meetin on stormwater � O-5 years X Develo a volunteer ro ram $ 0-5 ears Develop education materials about stormwater mana ement techni ues � 0-5 years Cooperate with efforts of the other a encies that educate the eneral ublic � 0-5 years X ��y o� �r��. otden � � � � � � � � �G�. �.'� Physical Development Department 763-593-8095/763-593-8109(fax) Date: February 26, 2018 To: Golden Valley Planning Commission From: lason Zimmerman, Planning Manager Emily Goellner, Associate Planner/Grant Writer Subject: Comprehensive Plan Work Session —Economic Competitiveness Chapter The seventh chapter of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan has been drafted and distributed to the City Council and the members of the Environmental, Open Space and Recreation, Human Rights, and Planning Commissions for review and comment. Please submit comments no later than 4:00 pm on Friday, March 2nd by email or phone. Staff will compile any initial reactions at the meeting on February 26. An informal Work Session will provide an opportunity to discuss any revisions that should be considered as the full Comp Plan is drafted. A future meeting will cover the Community Profile. Attachments • DRAFT Economic Competitiveness Chapter—2040 Comp Plan (13 pages) Economic Competitiveness Chapter DRAFT released February 2�, 20�8 OUTLINE � Introduction -�� , Key Points �_ Back round � �� g • I-listory of Economic Growth ��M p • Nousing and Redevelopment Authority Existing Conditions P L A N • Employment • Redevelopment • Workforce • Business Development Policy Plan Implementation Plan • Summary of Implementation Actions INTRODUCTION Economic competitiveness refers to examining and strengthening the ability to compete effectively and to prosper in the broader economy. Economic development typically refers to activities that directly aim to retain, attract, and grow businesses that bring wealth into a community or region. In the Twin Cities, this is effectively carried out by organizations such as Greater MSP, economic development authorities, cities, port authorities, industry associations, the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED), nonprofits, counties, chambers of commerce, and businesses. While the Metropolitan Council does not assume an active role in economic development, the Council's role in providing regional infrastructure, services, and amenities that serve as a foundation for economic growth is intended to align with and support ongoing local economic development efforts to the greatest extent possible. As Golden Valley strives to create a climate for meaningful economic growth and to provide a strong economic base for its residents and employees, it also seeks to be competitive with other cities in the metropolitan area. Because of its excellent proximity to downtown Minneapolis, access to major highways and future transit, educated residents, and high-quality amenities, Golden Valley continues to be a preferred location for businesses looking to locate or expand. At the same time, the city faces challenges including limited space for development, aging buildings and infrastructure, increasing highway congestion, and a shortage of affordable housing. 1 The Economic Competitiveness Plan examines four key factors that will influence Golden Valley's potential to grow and thrive: the employment base, opportunities and support for redevelopment, the quality of its workforce, and local programs for business development. KEY POINTS • Golden Valley has a rich history of attracting high profile companies who enjoy the convenient location close to downtown Minneapolis. • The city's daytime population (employees) is more than �50��0 of its nighttime population. • Active public involvement in the redevelopment of land has resulted in significant private investment. • Maintaining a wide range of community assets and amenities will be important for continuing to attract an educated and engaged workforce. BACKGROUND Nistory of Economic Growth Until the �q5os, the majority of the commercial spaces in Golden Valley were small service- oriented businesses, truck farming, and greenhouse operations. I-loneywell was one of the first large companies to locate in Golden Valley and initial construction of its facility west of Douglas Drive took place in �q56 with numerous additions in the years fol�owing. Tennant Company moved to its headquarters in 1957• In 1q58, General Mills opened its new 4o acre corporate headquarters site in the southwest corner of the city. Plans for the James Ford Bell Research Center were announced the same year at the location north of Plymouth Avenue. Pako Corporation moved into its site on the corner of Douglas Drive and Nwy 55 in �qbo and remained there until �985• Optum Nealth was the most recent tenant at this location. A number of other commercial and industrial businesses followed in the �96os and 7os, including some that remain in operation today such as Byerly's, Liberty Carton, Menards, and the first car dealerships north of Wayzata Boulevard. WTCN-TV (later WUSA and then KARE ��) built on the southwest corner of I-Iwy 55 and Boone Ave in �q73. Industrial areas grew up west of Winnekta Ave and north of Nwy 55, along Nevada Ave and Medicine Lake Road, and north of Wayzata Boulevard. In t982 the Valley Square redevelopment plan was adopted by the City and downtown Golden Valley began to be transformed through the actions of the Nousing and Redevelopment Authority. The Golden Nills Redevelopment Area was similarly targeted for renewal and the North Wirth Redevelopment Area provided a site for M. A. Mortenson Company to construct their headquarters in 1982. 2 Housing and Redevelopment Authority Since �q78, the Golden Valley Nousing and Redevelopment Authority (NRA) has played an important role in the city's growth and development. As the issue of redevelopment began to arise in the early�q7os, the City discussed the possibility of creating an NRA to expand the role of government involvement in economic and housing development activities. In �978, the NRA was created with City Council Members serving as NRA Commissioners. Over the years, the HRA has been active in many redevelopment projects throughout the City. The initial involvement in the late 7os and early 8os focused on preparing key locations for redevelopment (see Table 7.�). During this period, the NRA was aggressive in acquiring properties in order to support the City's vision for growth. Table 7.�: Early Redevelopment Areas Redevelopment Area Year Established Valley Square �978 Created to establish a mixed use district centered on Winnetka Ave north of Nwy 55 North Wirth �9�$ Used in the lq8os and qOs to help with soil clean-up to support redevelopment north of NWy 55 Golden Hills (now I-394 Corridor) 1984 expanded/renamed 20�2 Initially created to support redevelopment north of Nwy�2; expanded in 20�2 to support the objectives from the I-394 Corridor Study After a number of years of minimal involvement, the NRA became active again in the early 2000s with a series of actions to help spur redevelopment while also utilizing its tools to finance public amenities such as sidewalks, flood control, and affordable housing (see Table 7.2). Recent activity has mainly centered on the use of financial tools such as the establishment of Tax Increment Financing (TIF) districts, which allow developers to utilize the increase in property values that often accompany redevelopment for a fixed amount of time. After the duration of the TIF district has expired, the City then begins to benefit from the additional value going forward. Table 7.�: Recent Redevelopment Areas Redevelo ment Area Year Established Douglas Drive Corridor 20�0 Created to support redevelopment along Douglas Drive in conjunction with a planned road reconstruction Nighway 55 West 20�2 Created to support redevelopment north of Nwy 55, including public improvements to sidewalks and utilities 3 Winnetka & Medicine Lake Road 2p�5 Created to support redevelopment in the southeast quadrant of this intersection, including the creation of public infrastructure for flood storage With an ongoing need for redevelopment in the older industrial areas of the city, the NRA will continue to play an important role in focusing attention and efforts at targeted locations. The lack of an NRA levy, which would provide dedicated funds for acquisition and preparation of properties, remains a challenge and presents an opportunity for further exploration. EXISTING CONDITIONS Employment Golden Valley seeks to be competitive with other cities in the metropolitan area by creating a climate for meaningful economic growth. Despite its relatively small size, Golden Valley boasts the largest number of per capita jobs in the Twin Cities region and offers the second-highest number of jobs after Minneapolis. The city is home to a handful of large corporate headquarters, including General Mills and Allianz Life, which provide a strong tax base for the city and ample jobs for residents. The majority of Golden Valleyjobs are in manufacturing, professional/scientific/technical services, or healthcare, followed by management companies and finance and insurance. The city has fewjobs in the arts, public administration, or real estate. (See Table XX) This trend has been consistent over time. Table 7.q.: Key Industries ' Public Administration � ' Other Services ; Accommodation, Food Services � ; Arts, Entertainment, Recreation � ; Health Care and Social Assistance � �' Educational Services � ; Administrative,Support,Waste Management,...� ' i Management of Companies and Enterprises ' Professional,Scientific,Technical Services � Real Estate, Rental, Leasing � ' Finance and Insurance � Information � Retail Trade Wholesale Trade ' Manufacturing i ' ; , , , , , i ; ! 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 Data Source: Minnesota DEED QCEW(20�5,Q3) 4 General Mills is the largest employer, responsible for over tb percent of the total employment. Allianz Life, Noneywell, and Tennant Company are also large employers in Golden Valley. Around 4o percent of the total city employment is from the top nine employers listed in Table 7.5. Other notable employers include Liberty Carton, KARE ��, Room & Board, Breck School, and Minnesota United FC. These large employers add to the strength of the city's employment base and increase its per capita employment statistic, making it the highest in the Twin Cities metro area at �.57 jobs per person (based on 20�5 figures). Table 7.5: To Golden Valle Em (o ers Employer Number of Emplo ees Percent of Total Employment General Mills 5,50o ib.2% Allianz Life 2,Oq6 6.2��0 None well 1,732 4.0% Tennant Com an 8�3 2.4��0 Coura e Kenn boo 7.8��0 Mortenson Construction boo 1.8��0 Breck School 420 �.2��0 PreferredOne 360 �.��o Lubrication Technolo ies 350 �.o��o Data Source:Golden Valley's 2015 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report Golden Valley has four major concentrations of employment, all located along major transportation corridors (see Figure 7.�): �. South Central Golden Valley (north of I-394 and west of Nwy�oo) Major employers: Allianz Life, PreferredOne, Liberty Carton 2. West Side (running north-south from I-394 to Plymouth Ave east of Nwy�69) Major employers: General Mills, Lubrication Technologies 3. North Central Golden Valley (along Douglas Drive) Major employers: Noneywell, Tennant Company 4. East Central Golden Valley (north of Nwy 55) Major employers: Breck School, Mortenson Construction These areas, easily accessible via major transportation corridors are compact and fairly well defined, providing a clear separation from the single-family neighborhoods that surround them. It remains a goal of the City to encourage business growth and development without threatening the large residential areas that give the city its suburban identity. 5 Figure 7.1: Concentrations of Employment .�� y u�, k; N , , .1!�..i.�...�,�--� � Crystal � , New Nope t�! ; f �I Robbmstlale �� . . - . � . 4�;. .T; . . � _ � ioo � �i;�; r !. i � i ��,�Ar-, � i } � �� 165 – { � �� _ 1. – —� �""("1 �.y t.�.�.,� s i- _. �, -: _ , � b �, n :.S, t ,x,�-Y•x € �` . rt� . _ . ' j � YY� o � � � -��,�7-�, � � .�, ��xa-�j? �� . ' � � �� , � � , ,�. Plymouth � � � � �''�,... ��' �' j� .� ,;�i `� + ;~� �� .. � ~�a��- � r �� . ,, _ � . ��°�d��'a�� Minneapolis �� ;� � �� - u soii tilon o�i r��yhwa ��,.�� Y y.'/. .. � . ,�p �� , � :.�_...{L}.�.. � ..� ��.�� ..d....S-}7''. . ..�t,.:.._'".;=.� . ' .,n . �� , � � � � .�w�i�� , �.. °� t „ �� •m, i�s . .. '_�� i �, Minnetonka • �� 4 T�� 7QU0 ni s -– �oobon � _ � _� S[louis Patk a:.� '.�'� � �—E . . , . , , , , , Data Source: US Census,2015 data Redevelopment The reinvestment and redevelopment of underutilized or outdated properties and buildings is a key aspect of the city's Economic Competitiveness Plan. Along the City's corridors, and within its commercial/office nodes, redevelopment activity has been accelerating. A number of significant multi-family developments were proposed in the 2o�os - something that had not occurred in Golden Valley for many years. Continued growth pressure in the Twin Cities, initially concentrated in Minneapolis, began to spill westward, spurring new apartment projects in St. Louis Park, Edina, and other communities in the west and southwest metro area. Golden Valley has approved the following multi-family projects since the adoption of its last Comprehensive Plan: Table 7.3: Multi-Family Projects Development Location Opened Units Arcata Xenia Ave and Golden Nills 20�5 �73 apartment units Drive Meadow Ridge Country Club Drive 2o�b 5o senior units (�5 assisted living,35 addition memory care) 6 Nello. Golden Valley Road west of 20�7 �72 apartment units Decatur Ave Cornerstone Creek Golden Valley Road west of 20�7 45 affordable units for adults with Decatur Ave developmental disabilities Laurel Ponds Laurel Ave and Pennsylvalnia 20�7 24 detached townhomes Ave Central Park West, Utica Ave south of I-394 20�8 8o apartment units in Golden Valley; Phase 1 »q in St. Louis Park The Liberty Winnetka Ave and Medicine 2oi8 55 townhomes,�87 apartment units Lake Road Talo Apartments Circle Down west of Nwy�o0 20�8 303 apartment units expected Global Pointe Circle Down west of Nwy 700 20�q 9$senior units (68 assisted living,30 expected memory care) The Xenia Xenia Ave and Golden Nills 20�9 354 apartment units Drive expected Schuett project, Golden Valley Road west of 2o�q �02 senior units Phase� Decatur Ave expected Over this same period of time a number of existing businesses have undertaken substantial renovations or expansions. Many other new businesses have also chosen to locate in Golden Valley. • Morrie's Luxury Auto • Morrie's Neritage Car Club • Porsche • Motorwerks MINI � Luther Companies • Borton Volvo • Room & Board • CenterPoint • General Miils James Ford Bell Research Center • M. A. Mortenson • Ramada • Noliday Inn Express • AC Marriott • Culver's • TruStone Financial In addition, Golden Valley continues to be a desirable location for small businesses. The commercial and light industrial areas of the city, especially those near the downtown, have seen a number of new service, restaurant, and entertainment options lease and renovate spaces. The updated Land Use Plan targets a number of specific areas where additional redevelopment might be appropriate. These are not the only possible areas of change, but due to circumstances such as proximity to major roadways, the age of existing structures, or shifting market forces, 7 these are logical places to focus attention. Many are suitable for a variety of uses mixed side-by- side (horizontally) while a few may be appropriate for a mix of uses within buildings (vertically). As a way to support investment in these properties, the City will be providing public information on vacant sites and buildings and will continue to work to ensure that redevelopment policies and procedures are clearly defined. In order to inform the public about approved, under construction, or recently completed projects, the City maintains a web page with a map and a brief description of each. Workforce Golden Valley has built a reputation on excellent employment options, a high-quality housing stock, great City services, and a strong sense of community. The city is a uniquely positioned first ring suburb - closer to downtown Minneapolis than portions of Minneapolis, yet with abundant green space. Because of this balance between urban living and suburban tranquility, Golden Valley is a desirable location to live and work for individuals and families from across the metropolitan area. Amenities such as the city's park and open space system, Brookview Community Center, and numerous schools all help attract a potential workforce to the city. Figure 7.3: Educational Attainment of Golden Valley Residents, �990-20�0 iooro �. _�_ . ..:�:� _ Graduate/Professional Graduate/Professional 90% Degree, 15% Degree, 17% Graduate/Professional Degree,20% ...,,..-... � � 80% _ � _ _ ,. 70% Bachelor Degree,2?% Ba�lor Degree,30% � Bachelor Degree,34% 60% �� ,;> . _. �..m :<. Associate Degree,7% 50% Associate Degree,7% 0 Some College or No Associate Degree,6% ° Degree,21% Some College or No Degree,23% Some College or No 30% � Degree, 18% 20% High School Graduate, Z3� High School Graduate, High School Graduate, 0 18% 18% 10/o Did Not Graduate High Did Not Graduate High School,7% Did Not Graduate High 0% School,6% School,4% 1990 Census 2000 Census 2010 Census 8 Since �qqo, a larger proportion of Golden Valley residents have completed graduate/professional and bachelor degrees, which is reflective of national trends. There has also been a reduction in the proportion of residents who did not graduate high school (see Figure 7.3). The level of educational attainment is high in Golden Valley when compared to attainment for the 7-county metropolitan area. Of the total employment in 2015, approximately 32,6�� of those employed in Golden Valley live outside of the city, while approximately�0,889 of those employed outside of Golden Valley live in the city. Only�,000 residents (three percent of the labor force) live and work in Golden Valley. Figure 7.2: Golden Valley Employment Employment Golden Valley, 1990-2040 45,000 40,000 38,900 37,500 36,000 35,000 32,908 33,194 33,885 30,142 30,000 Z8�589 25,000 20,000 � jt. 15,000 �: 10,000 1 ,. k �: 5,000 �.,..: 0 1990 Met 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 Met 2030 Met 2040 Met Council DEED DEED DEED DEED Council Council Council Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate Forecast Forecast Forecast Business Development Golden Valley is committed to helping local businesses and entrepreneurs thrive by providing them with the resources and information they need to develop their business strategies. The City's Open to Business program and Nennepin County's Economic Gardening program are two of the main resources that allow local residents to support their own business initiatives. Open to Business Open to Business is a program for residents of Golden Valley and New Nope that offers free business advice and consultation for business owners or entrepreneurs. This program is jointly 9 offered by the two Cities and the Metropolitan Consortium of Community Developers (MCCD). It can help determine the feasibility of a new business or help business owners find capital or develop marketing strategies. All consultation is one-on-one and can provide entrepreneurs with the information they need to bring a new business to the area. Nennepin Countv Economic Gardening Economic Gardening is a program for existing, privately help businesses offered through Nennepin County. The program helps provide scholarships for research to support businesses ready to transition from second-stage growth. It is not for start-ups, but instead for small businesses ready to mature into a (arger size. These businesses must have between �o and 99 employees and revenue between $� million and $5o million. The program supports business growth through peer learning and forums for its participants POLICY PLAN The Policy Plan for this Chapter includes a set of long-term goals and objectives that will be fulfilled through specific actions and policy decisions. The Policy Plan is a long-range document that expresses the values of the community and establishes a vision. It provides direction and guidance for the future of the City in terms of policymaking, improvements, programs, investments, priorities, and work plans. It can be utilized for decision-making purposes by elected officials, commissions, boards, staff, and other interested members of the community. The Policy Plan is updated every�o years based on new data and community feedback as required by Minnesota law. Goal �: Understand the Local Business Environment Update and analyze data about Golden Valley's business and employment environment in order to understand the City's role in the regional economy and to leverage its competitive advantage. Objectives t. Maintain a set of City metrics related to employment, real estate, and economic demographics. 2. Recognize the City's position in the regional economy. 3. Anticipate and adapt to shifts in the business cycle. Goal 2: Develop Economic Partnerships Strengthen relationships with local and regional economic development and business partners. Objectives t. Strengthen ties with business groups and entities such as Greater MSP, TwinWest Chamber of Commerce, and the Golden Valley Business Council. 2. Expand relationships with brokers and developers to understand market conditions. 10 3. Develop new and expand existing relationships with economic development partners,such as colleges, non-profits,and lenders,to provide resources that support business growth. Goal 3: Retain and Expand Existing Job Base Work to accommodate the needs of existing businesses across industries and to support growth and expansion that is compatible with surrounding neighborhoods. Objectives 1. Strengthen relationships with existing businesses. 2. Preserve the City's commercial/industrial base. 3. Foster business resiliency through economic cycles. 4. Facilitate business growth and expansion in Golden Valley. Goal 4: Strengthen Link between Land Use and Economy Examine how the City's land use plan impacts and can support the larger economic vision by zoning for a variety of types of uses. Encourage high quality redevelopment within targeted districts. Objectives �. Articulate redevelopment objectives for key properties and corridors. 2. Encourage reinvestment and contemporary uses in existing properties. 3. Ensure redevelopment and reinvestment result in increased value, improve appearance, and meet contemporary needs and standards. Goal 5: Promote Amenities to Attract Workers Continue to enhance all aspects of the City in order to provide the amenities necessary to attract workers and their families to Golden Valley. Objectives �. Offer a balanced and attractive community that includes a full range of housing types and prices, parks and open spaces for recreation, retail and entertainment centers, and good transportation options. 11 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN The Implementation Plan for this Chapter includes a set of specific actions to accomplish the goals and objectives set forth in the Policy Plan. It differs from the Policy Plan in that it provides the opportunity to easily measure progress and note tangible outcomes from each task. Each task provides an approximate cost estimate for the work and notes a timeframe in which the specific action should take place. Tasks are prioritized based on financial feasibility, staff capacity, importance or urgency for action, and other factors. The Implementation Plan is updated every 5 years (mid-cycle of the �o year Policy Plan) based on progress and new opportunities. Understand the Local Business Environment Implementation Actions • Maintain regular economic data and monitor metrics • Meet periodically with brokers, developers and other experts regarding the local market • Reach out to local businesses and business groups regarding the economic environment Develop Economic Partnerships Implementation Actions • Promote development opportunities in the City to brokers, developers, and Greater MSP • Participate with economic development partners on business supportive initiatives • Meet with government, educational, and non-profit entities to identify resources that support investment and business growth Retain and Expand Existing Job Base Implementation Actions • Adopt a City business subsidy policy • Create a "toolbox" of resources available to support local businesses • Proactively meet with businesses to build relationships • Ensure infrastructure is sufficient to accommodate business growth Strengthen Link between Land Use and Economy Implementation Actions • Establish visions and goals for each of the City's four Redevelopment Districts utilizing ULI's Redevelopment Ready guide • Amend the Zoning Code to allow for greater range of uses within the Light Industrial Zoning District • Explore the implementation of design standards requiring the use of durable materials, architectural elements, and site amenities 12 Promote Amenities to Attract Workers Implementation Actions • Utilize the Implementation sections of each chapter of the Comprehensive Plan to prioritize and initiate key investments across the City • Develop a communications strategy to promote Golden Valley as a place to live and work Summary of Implementation Actions ' • - - - • Understand the Local Business Environment Maintain and monitor regular economic data �� X Meet with experts regarding the local market $ X Outreach to local businesses and rou s $ X Develo Economic Partnershi s Promote develo ment o ortunities $ 0-5 ears X Participate in business supportive initiatives �� X Meet with other entities to identify resources to su ort investment � O-5 years X Retain and Ex and Existin Job Base Ado t a Cit business subsid olic $ 0-5 ears Create a "toolbox" of resources $$ 5-�o ears Proactivel meet with businesses $ 0-5 ears X Ensure sufficient infrastructure to support business rowth �� 5-�o years X Stren then Link between Land Use and Economy Establish goals for each of the four Redevelo ment Districts � O-5 years Amend the Zoning Code for more flexible Li ht Industrial districts � O-5 years Explore implementation of design standards � 0-5 years Promote Amenities to Attract Workers Prioritize and initiate ke reinvestments $$$ O-lo ears X Develop a communications strategy to romote Golden Valle �� 0-5 years X 13