03-12-18 PC Agenda AGENDA
Planning Commission
Comp Plan Conversation
Golden Valley City Hall, 7800 Golden Valley Road
Council Conference Room
Monday, March 12, 2018
7 pm
1. Comp Plan Work Session — Intro/Community Profile Chapter
2. Planning Articles
This dacu�7�ent is availahle i�7 G�lternate formats upan a 72-ha��r req�iesfi. Pl�ase ca(I
� 763-593-�006(TTY: 7ta3-�93-396�}to make a request. Exam�7les of afternate formats ;
� r7jay includ� large print,el�ctronic, Braille,autiiacass�fite,etc. �,_
����� ��� �.. �::
¢ �
,m ' ., � �.� , . �•� 4 �.. i .g.
�
�'hysical De�v�e�o�m.ent �lep�rtrnent
���-���-so���»�-���-��ca�����)
Date: March 12, 2018
To: Golden Valley Planning Commission
From: Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager
Emily Goellner, Associate Planner/Grant Writer
Subject: Comprehensive Plan Work Session —Intro/Community Profile Chapter
The final chapter of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan has been drafted and distributed to the City
Council and the members of the Environmental, Open Space and Recreation, Human Rights, and
Planning Commissions for review and comment.
Please submit comments no later than 4:00 pm on Monday, March 12th by email or phone. Staff
will compile all of the comments and provide a summary with initial reactions at the meeting. An
informal Work Session will provide an opportunity to discuss any revisions that should be
considered as the full Comp Plan is drafted.
A complete draft is anticipated to be ready for review by the City Council and Planning Commission
in early May and will be released for public comment on May 16.
Attachments
• DRAFT Intro/Community Profile Chapter—2040 Comp Plan (15 pages)
Introduction/Community Profile
DRAFT released March 5, 20�8
OUTLINE
�
Introduction
--,g,�t..,.,;
• What is a Comprehensive Plan? ,,a���
• Why does Golden Valley need one?
• What have past plans said? � � � �
Community Profile ��M p
• Who are we?
• What do we want to be? � �� �
INTRODUCTION
What is a Comprehensive Plan?
A Comprehensive Plan is a document that is a reflection of a community's vision for the
future. It guides decision makers over time by providing a series of goals, objectives, and
implementation actions to ensure a logical and cohesive pattern of development within the
city. Minnesota state statute requires that all government units in the seven-county metro
area have Comprehensive Plans in place to ensure that growth and redevelopment is
consistent with regional plans and systems. Before adopting a Comprehensive Plan, a City
Council is required to take input from the public, surrounding cities, and relevant agencies. All
Comprehensive Plans are ultimately reviewed and approved by the Metropolitan Council.
Once adopted by a City Council, the Comprehensive Plan becomes the basis for enacting
land use decisions that shape development and redevelopment. In addition to providing
direction regarding possible growth, the Comprehensive Plan also guides officials in regulating
and administrating a number of other community elements, such as housing, local
transportation systems, parks and other open spaces, water and sanitary sewer infrastructure,
and more.
As demographics and trends change over time, the Comprehensive Plan must be reviewed
and revised to ensure it remains relevant to the conditions and the community vision. This
typically occurs every �o years. Because the Comprehensive Plan affects each resident and
business in Golden Valley, public participation is necessary with every update of the plan.
Why does Golden Valley need one?
Comprehensive Plans generally conceive of a vision 2o to 3o years in the future. Golden
Valley implemented its first Comprehensive Plan in �959. Since then, the plan has been
updated several times with the last revision taking place in 2009. Through careful planning
and with community participation, the City initiated redevelopment of a downtown hub at the
1
crossroads of Winnetka Ave and Golden Valley Road, facilitated the reconstruction of roads
and highways, and completed many parks and infrastructure projects that make Golden Valley
a desirable place to live.
The Comprehensive Plan helps ensure that Golden Valley remains a dynamic city that offers a
wide range of amenities and services while implementing goals and objectives that work to
preserve and upgrade infrastructure. It helps support the sustainability of the region by
encouraging growth and redevelopment in targeted areas while simultaneously protecting the
environment through regulation and preservation.
What have past plans said?
The Comprehensive Plan the City adopted in �q77, which planned through the year�990,
focused on coordinating land uses and new development with transportation improvements
and community facilities to ensure anticipated growth could be accommodated. Many of the
goals included in that document remain relevant today, including:
• Develop a transportation system in which highways are designed to facilitate rapid
movement while local streets accommodate slower moving traffic.
• Provide a safe and convenient means to reach all areas by foot, bicycle, or public
transportation.
• Set aside a large proportion of land for wildlife and maintain high air, noise, and water
quality.
• Provide a recreation facility convenient to each neighborhood resident.
• Develop an attractive community focal point which provides an optimum mix of
shopping and community facilities (between Bassett Creek, the Golden Valley Golf
Course, and Nwy 55)•
• Provide housing opportunities for citizens of all income and age levels.
The 200o Comprehensive Plan (adopted in �q82), while maintaining many of the same goals,
acknowledged that Golden Valley was approaching full development and that it lacked
sufficient affordable housing. In addition, it stated that overseeing the sanitary sewer system
was becoming a matter of preservation and revitalization rather than expansion.
A plan adopted in �999 was meant to anticipate land use needs through 2030, while other
chapters developed goals for the year 2020. The language of that document centered on
finding the proper balance between different uses, between quality and diversity, between
development and redevelopment, between nature and humans, and between local and
regional interests.
Beginning in 2002, Golden Valley went above and beyond the usual community participation
involved in revising a Comprehensive Plan by preceding the formal process with a wide-
spread and inclusive community-led visioning exercise called Envision Golden Valley. Through
this multi-year engagement process, more than boo people weighed in to provide their
thoughts on the city's future. The two core ideas that emerged were Creatively Connecting
People and Places and Inspiring Care for Community.
2
Creatively Connecting People and Places
Golden Valley's location at the axis of urban density and suburban tranquility makes us
acutely aware of our connections to a greater whole. We enjoy the access afforded by
the highway system that intersects our community but want to reduce its impact on
our neighborhoods and natural spaces. "Connecting" isn't just about getting from place
to place. It's also about bringing people together—by fostering inviting public spaces,
vital businesses, and community institutions where people work and play, encounter
their fellow citizens, and discover common interests.
(nspiring Care for Community
True community is defined not by borders, but by its common ground. As individuals,
families, neighborhoods, and organizations, our actions protect and enhance the public
assets for which we share responsibility:
� air, water, wildlife, and landscape
• playgrounds, parks, streets, and pathways
• good government, education, and public services
• safety and welfare of our fellow citizens
Envision summary document: a shared vision for golden valley's future
Though developed �5 years ago, these ideas continue to guide much of the approach to civic
life in Golden Valley today and the basic themes are woven throughout the goals and
objectives of the 204o Comprehensive Plan.
COMMUNITY PROFILE
Who are we?
Golden Valley is an inner-ring suburb located just four miles to the west of downtown
Minneapolis. Its 10.5 square miles encompass large areas of single-family neighborhoods,
concentrations of commercial and industrial activities, scattered educational and religious
facilities, and generous swaths of open space in the form of parks, golf courses, and other
natural areas.The city is bisected by two major transportation corridors while two others sit
on the western and southern borders.
Originally settled as farmland in the mid-�800s, Golden Valley was established as a village in
�886. Pockets of commerce sprang up along the railroads that crossed the area and local
highways became the backbone for new residential growth. Post-war expansion in the �q5os
and 6os brought significant growth in single-family neighborhoods. By the �97os, the City
began to explore ways to encourage redevelopment of tired and underutilized properties. A
Nousing and Redevelopment Authority (NRA) was created to acquire and prepare land for
redevelopment. These significant undertakings paved the way for the establishment of the
current downtown at Winnetka Ave and Golden Valley Road and the business district north of
the new I-394 at Xenia Ave. By the late �q8os, most of the vacant land in the city had been
3
developed. The last large residential project,the Nidden Lakes development, was approved
and constructed in the late �qqos and early 2000s.
Golden Valley is fortunate to have over�,�oo acres of parks, wetlands, and other protected
natural areas spread throughout the city. In addition, Sweeney, Twin, and Wirth Lakes, as well
as Bassett Creek and numerous ponds, provide attractive and ecologically important water
features. There are three golf courses (two public and one private) located within the city
limits. Brookview Community Center offers a gathering place for residents and visitors as well
as a focal point for senior activities. Two school districts - Nopkins and Robbinsdale - split the
city north and south (see Figure �.�: School Districts) and other public and private elementary
and high schools are spread throughout the area. Religious institutions and other non-profits
offer opportunities for fellowship and social services.
Fi ure �.�: School Districts
�;• i-. ; ia ��
}
: ' i� j '�
�IA������� (i", �� :
__ � � �._ ; �i
K . �� i_ + , .. ... ..... ,' .
. . .x�,,. � .�,� . . .,, . .. i • .� � �-�� i f �.
� � L..�s � s , � � 1 {� � �---( � ,�, . ,.«�,.�
�' �r.4 i— �`j k I s.. _ .� �'4 • { ' � ' .. . �r`� t ' '� ;
j� �
_ .�._�. � "i: �11�'�`��• (, ` i f � �� ,�. �k��� � ^" �+ir
�
..
. -•
. � ,�
i �.r
.. , . . , . _ ..
:.
. • .,..,.. .
__.
" r ;��.7 I 1 � 1�`. {'"•� l .... .. .. .... ...?+ \ i .
• � �
. .. . ..., . . ,
� .. • - ,
. , � •T
, , ; ,- �. �. �.. _ � , i� ROBBII��D�LE �28� y� , � �:9�� �-:
. � . , �
. �. . , _
,•. ;;,,� � f � �..� . _ . � , .
. .
, ._. , . - ,__ -�
�.�.t ' �� 1 } s } � r
"��':..... �` . —'� �� . . � � �-"�� -'. . , r ) ;1 z, "�' �;� tii y<
�_�. � �� �= ! � ��, j , " --. � W ._, � �� ��� �� �" y
'� 1 �.�., i _, t .�.. . � . � �� '+� 1 �) �`, �'.- _. f ,,�`i� �'' ' �'• �i?�,;� 1
� �. � �l� � � .... �! � y f,_,.. �I '4 � . ._'{ �"� � � � � �� t���� �? E�:. .O
,_... 1� .� � - a..e w
_ .. .r" j j %�� � I 1 . Q .� �1 E i � � .... �� . ...a�...i" i�
�---`._: . _. .
,.�,�, _...� ._,_,..,�^., 3•i � � � a f j 3 � . t ���� W
�. � � � �., , , -.. , � �,�
. : ,;
� ,
� �. _. _. -:.__.____ : .�. �. �', � ; j} tZ
,�
;
f —� + • �, _._ ...... G � �.
.., x✓' � t �r , � � � 3 � _ ��� .m,� -�,... . . �; � jii�� ���
i__ ,r3- ' �. �'. f 1 , ! r � _ i '�__ , �5�, a='
i _ - ... � �: � <<
�" ' - ,`�- ,�`��{ r ! � j� ,a,�. � y, � ���� �_�. E � _j y �,
_ � ° ' .~, -- �'- •- , -T� ' � ,�. _�_ � � ! ; � 3 �;. v E -
�... Q�., r ��J B _ • � t-- -• � , •' /' /
_. i _� .~ � j `. � �'�'� � � I .��f
-'. ; , � .�, : � ,` �-,.�
.�.a
� � -�., , ' � �
, , .. :,' � s; �� . ' ti. _ ._. � , .�:
!' i i �di
� r -
. _ . t�, = j� �HOP�C#�S'#27�1 ..- II _; �w -�,
� )t _ . _- ; _ _ ' �� ' _.'�; ' i �'- '
�ei _ __ ' t , .. , � ---�
� -- e t � � 4_s..�'' j _ _,.. � �
a e " , f i j . •, � j,.} �"•,-�.,,p,:.• -� ._�_ �� � . ~ �...
c�
....... ``:�i,��_._.�...»...,_...,._���~ R .. ,.j+�l�y `r
. , ��.... �... w.snwoa � � � . . . ..� '.*�` � ..��" .�:�W
-' ST. LOUIS PARK #283 � .�.�j '".:,' �
���r _ F� j;i 1 r
A number of international corporations call Golden Valley home, including General Mills and
Tennant Company. Other businesses have a significant presence in the city: Noneywell,
Allianz Life, Mortenson Construction, and Courage Kenny Rehabilitation Institute among
4
them. Commercial nodes in the downtown, along I-Iwy 55, at the intersection of Nwy�oo and
Duluth St, and north of I-394 provide space for restaurants, shopping, auto-oriented services,
and other retail destinations. Three industrial areas continue to support manufacturing and
warehousing enterprises that contribute to the city's tax base.
Throughout the �qqos and early 2000s, the city's population hovered atjust over 20,000,
dipping in 200o due to decreasing household sizes and a stagnation in the housing market.
Pent up demand caused by the Great Recession resulted in a number of new apartments
being approved in the 2olOs and a corresponding surge in population. City estimates now
surpass those forecast by the Metropolitan Council (2�,30o in 202o and 22, qoo in 2040),
predicting a population of 26,50o by 202o and 28,30o by 2040 (Figure 1.2: Golden Valley
Population, 7qqo-2o40). This increase is consistent with the larger demographic trends in the
Twin Cities, which anticipate a 27 percent increase in population between 20�o and 2040.
Figure �.2: Golden Valley Population, �990-2040
28,300
28,000 27,400
26,500
26,000
24,000 � �
22,900
22,000 21,571 22,000
20,971 21,300
20,281 Z0,510 20,371
20,000
18,000
;�
f
16,000 E
,1
14,000 !
�
12,000
1990 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2030 2040
■Census/Met Council City Forecasts
On average, the city's population is aging. The 20�o Census showed a significant segment of
residents reaching their bos. This trend will require necessary shifts in thinking by the City in
order to provide the services and meet the needs of a growing senior population. Nowever,
20�5 census data hinted at a sizable segment of residents in their late 2os and early 3os,
suggesting that a wave of younger families may be on the horizon.
5
Overall, the population of Golden Valley is less diverse, more highly educated, and has lower
levels of poverty than other inner-ring suburbs in the metro area. Consistent with regional
trends that show a significant increase in the percentage of persons of color by 2040, recent
local trends show that diversity is increasing with a shift from b percent non-white in �990 to
�8 percent in 20�5 (Figure�.3: Population by Race and Ethnicity, �qqo-2o�5). Education levels
remain high (Figure �.4: Educational Attainment,�990-20�0) but the percentage of the
population living below the poverty line has almost doubled from 4.3 percent in 1990 to 8.2
percent in 2015.
Figure�.3: Population by Race and Ethnicity,199o-2015
iooio
�� �
90% ,., ��.-
� -
80%
70%
60%
50%
94.0%
89.9%
40% 84.0% 81.7%
30%
20%
10°/a
0%
1990 Census 2000 Census 2010 Census 2011-2015 ACS
■White alone Two or more races
■Some other race alone ■Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone �
■Hispanic or Latino � Black or African American alone
�Asian alone ■American Indian and Alaska�lative alone
6
Figure �.4: Educational Attainment, 2990-20�0
soor
Graduate/Professional
Graduate/Professional
90o� Degree, 15% Degree, 17% Graduate/Professional
Degree,20%
.�_. n �. . _ ,
80%
70% Bachelor Degree,27%
Bachelor Degree,30`�0
"` " �`' Ba:helor Degree,34%
60%
Associate Degree,7%
50% Associate Degree,7%
Some College or No Associate Degree,6%
40% Degree,21%
Some College or No
Degree,23°/a Some College or No
30% Degree, 18%
20% High School Graduate,
23% High School Graduate,
High School Graduate,
18% 18%
10%
Did Not 6raduate High Did Not Graduate High Did Not Graduate High
School,7% School,6% School,4%
0%
1990 Census 2000 Census 2010 Census
7
The combination of rising housing costs and a flattening of income has resulted in a significant
increase in the percentage of Golden Valley households facing a high cost burden, defined as
paying more than 3o percent of a household budget for housing. There has been a slight shift
from home ownership to rental living(Figure 1.5: Nousing Tenure and Vacancy,�qqo-2o�5).
Vacancy rates are low and contribute to high housing prices. This trend is consistent with data
from across the metro area and housing affordability continues to be an issue that must be
addressed regionally, not just locally.
Figure 1.5: Nousing Tenure and Vacancy, �990-2075
iooro
0
90/0 18.68% 18.21%
80% 20.95% 22.05%
70%
60%
50%
40% 0 80.16%
78.28/
73.34% 73.55%
30%
20%
10%
0%
1990 Census 2000 Census 2010 Census 2011-2015 ACS
■Owner occupied �Renter occupied =�Vacant
8
Over recent decades, Golden Valley has shown steady though incremental housing growth.
The approval of several new multi-family projects in the 2o�os has resulted in a sudden rise in
new households with more anticipated in coming years. The Metropolitan Council forecasts a
household count of 9,80o by 2040; due to the number of multi-family projects in the pipeline
and additional opportunities for redevelopment in the future, the City predicts a count closer
to �2,400 (Figure �.b: Golden Valley Nouseholds, �9qo-2o40).
Figure�.b: Golden Valley Nouseholds, �990-2040
12,500 12,400
iz,000
11,600
i l,500
10,500
9,800
9,600
9,500 9,171 9,300
8,905 8,816
8,449 "�
8,500 8,273
;�§
�
�
7,500 �
� '
6,500
1990 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2030 2040
■Census/Met Council City Forecasts
9
Employment numbers in Golden Valley have consistently increased throughout the�qqos and
early 2000s (Figure �.7: Golden Valley Employment, �9qo-2o40). While the Metropolitan
Council is forecasting an additional 5,00o jobs by 2040, recent trends for office and retail
uses and a greater demand for housing than for other types of redevelopment suggest the
actual amount of growth may be lower. Although Golden Valley boasts the greatest per capita
job numbers in the metro area due to the large inflow of employees each work day, only
around three percent of employees who live within the city also work here. This results in
added congestion of the transportation system. Eighty percent of Golden Valley workers
drive to work alone—a number that has remained unchanged in 25 years (Figure �.8: Means of
Transportation to Work, �qqo-2o�5). With very little ability for an increase in roadway capacity,
the City will be looking for opportunities to increase transit service (both bus and light rail) as
well as to support new bicycle and pedestrian options in the future.
Figure�.7: Golden Valley Employment, �990-2040
40,000
38,900
38,000 37,500
36,000 36,000 35,700
34,650
34,000 33,885 33,600
32,908 33,194
32,000
30,142
30,000
28,589
28,000
26,000
24,000
22,000
20,000
1990 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2030 2040
■ DEED/Met Council City Forecasts
10
Figure �.8: Means of Transportation to Work, 7990-20�5
iooio �
Worked at Worked at
home,5% Walked, 1% home,6% Walked,1%
90%
' ,- : , �-
Pubiic a�', '�; Other Public - -
80/ transp�j ation, �, means, 1% transportation,
° � � 4/o P Other
,
°� � means,2%
�%
70%
f'
60% ,
50% Drove atone,80%
Drove alone,80%
40%
�'
30%
�
Y:
Z��o
10% . .. . .._. . .
Carpooled,9% Carpooled,7%
0%
1990 Census 2011-2015 ACS
What do we want to be?
In order to help inform the goals and objectives of the 204o Comprehensive Plan, staff
worked to gather feedback from the community and incorporate it into the theme of the
document. A community survey, conducted in the summer of 2o�b, provided information
about numerous aspects of City services as well as various systems including transportation,
housing, parks, economic development, and environmental issues. Results showed an overall
satisfaction with City services and the perceived value received for the level of taxes paid,
concerns regarding aging infrastructure, and continued interest in expanding opportunities for
outdoor activities such as community gardens, off-leash dog areas, and off-street trails.
Through an open house held in September of 20�6 and via an online questionnaire posted on
the City's website, staff collected additional comments and ideas from residents. Participants
were asked to provide words that described what they value about Golden Valley today and
how they would like Golden Valley to be described in �o or 2o years. The results were
organized into two word clouds, with the size of the text proportional to the frequency with
which the words were used (Figures �.q and �.�o).
11
Figure�.9: Word Cloud - Golden Valley Now
���� ��� ,,
GREAT PEOPLE INCLUSIVE �������e�� �
. W o .� SCHOOLS
����l��-
� LL Q RESIDENTIAL W
o � �
� = o � NEIGHBORHOODS � �
° Z V CENTRAL V � Z W � �
� W � � z � "'� � W
1— Z C LASS 1� �.. � � oo ,� oc
� W C7 W GROWING W � � V
J a V TOLERANT �. = O � � Q
� m tI� CLO E � � W 'Q �
Z S �� 1— _ � �.
a
� �— Q v� oW V
p� m W J V
0
� Qo3 Q
a � � R O A D-O R I E N T E D G R E E
� N
� � �NSERVATIVE URBAN PLANNIN�
� � W �usN
� � �� � W � � �
� V , � � � GOOD
� CONVE I E � � � - � �
�� . N NT ; >
�� �IEAR THE ACTION '� W Z a
_ Z OPEN
� TRANSITIONING ••1 TREE
�► . ..,
Gv2o4o COMMUNITY (� ,�� ',�
�� � ...
... �
12
Figure �.�o: Word Cloud - Golden Valley of the Future
Z �VE � .. a �5�:.: F �
SUSTA � ������ � �
INABILITY � �� .. �
REHAB HOUSING Q � �
0 CO M P �c z
OSTiORGANICS a _ �
� W � �
� co N N ECT� _ � �
VITY _ W
ZZ WW
— SMALL BUSI W N � W
� NESSES � > �
� � m � Z �c �
LIGHT RAIL �. �s � W
� � � � aaW �n
_' � ��. 3 �n
0 a W � G � t�
W ui Z ��
� J � W � Qo0
m �
Z a �, W
Qo �,. W F- �-
�c � Z �
� o � �.ua WWZ
� � ,� NEIGHBORNOODS "� n (' W �
� �, > > � �
� Q � o � �
� NATIVE PLANTINGS ,� � W O
'� Q �
. WATER QUALITY �� � 1� v
�� ::: ..,
� TRANSIT FRIENDLY.�° ��� .
�v2o4o INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT
A quick comparison of the two images reveals that while many of the impressions of Golden
Valley today carry over to an envisioned Golden Valley of the future (Safe, Quiet, Green,
Parks, Friendly), other new ideas and priorities begin to emerge when the city is reimagined in
the year 2040. Phrases such as Diversity, Transit Friendly, Light Rail, Vibrant Downtown, and
Targeted Density—in addition to the prominent presence of a Bicycle and Pedestrian
Network—rise to the top of the list.
City staff also developed a mobile tool to prompt users to consider a range of topics and to
record their responses. This Comp Plan in a Box was shared with interested groups and those
who were unable to attend the open house (Figure �.��: Comp Plan in a Box Worksheets).
13
Figure �.��: Comp Plan in a Box Worksheets
I�i;�c;1.C C ,�► Ct
G�
-��-� ��, P.� � G� C N IN A ��X
� P.� � C��„�p p�p
Economit � vopp�"x�
5 811d _ De1 �P�rennial Favorites:{deaa Tha!Keep
c�,�,M� Park - �-
, .�,�-�,d Land Use
��-
,.���,..v �E �G�. R.a..� `I'ransp+�;� r Re� �� d Resilience
%w'"" Wate An
� � <.,.��� � ,�„ Gdd•r 5ustainsbility
.. p.d�.+���...s..d {,.�.,.�.:ti� ,���a..�K D'E"". ._.,.�M.. F>,df.a�z�mob�l �. ._.......��
Bringing together the results of each of these outreach efforts—the community survey, the
open house, the web page, and the Comp Plan in a Box feedback—along with input from the
City Council and other City Commissions, clear themes begin to emerge to provide a common
thread throughout all of the chapters of the 204o Comprehensive Plan:
❑ Support a dynamic town center
❑ Showcase Golden Valley as a "green" community
• Preserve parks and nature areas
• Embrace sustainability
❑ Emphasize all aspects of a multi-modal transportation system
❑ Ensure policies, procedures, and decisions are inclusive
• Support racial, cultural, and economic diversity
• Accommodate the needs of an �in� population
❑ Make important investments in infrastructure
As inner-ring suburbs such as Golden Valley age, many reach a point in their life cycle that can
be identified as a critical tipping point in determining a path forward. For communities that
developed as post-war bedroom suburbs, undeveloped land is likely rare. Some buildings and
much of the original infrastructure (streets, water and sewer lines, etc.), if they have not been
rebuilt, are close to reaching the end of their expected lifespan. As population growth from
the urban core moves outwards, the inner ring suburbs begin to lose the homogeneity they
one had, creating a new and sometimes unexpected demographic mix. Finally, newer
communities at the developing edge now hold some of the attraction that once belonged to
the inner ring suburbs, including large, affordable, residential lots and access to new job
centers.
For those cities that are caught unprepared or lack the resolve to compete in this new reality,
these changes can lead to a downward spiral of disinvestment and irrelevance. Those that are
able to capitalize on their assets, reinvest in their infrastructure, and reinvent themselves as
appealing alternatives to both the urban core and the developing edge can evolve into
suburbs that remain attractive and relevant and that can provide a high quality of life to
residents and the business community.
Golden Valley is well-positioned to capitalize on its advantages—desirable location, ease of
access, strong neighborhoods, abundant open space, and high resident satisfaction—in order
to remain strong and to continue to flourish over the coming decades.
14
Given these issues and the priorities that have been identified by those participating in the
comprehensive planning process, what specifically can Golden Valley do to ensure it selects
the correct path forward? The 204o Comprehensive Plan attempts to provide answers by
using the lens of Suburban Evolution to evaluate and advance implementation actions for
each of the chapters that follow.
15