05-14-18 PC Minutes
Regular Meeting of the
Golden Valley Planning Commission
May 14, 2018
A regular meeting of the Planning Commission was held at the Golden Valley City Hall,
Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota, on Monday,
May 14, 2018. Chair Baker called the meeting to order at 7 pm.
Those present were Planning Commissioners Angell, Baker, Blum, Brookins, Johnson,
Pockl, and Segelbaum. Also present were Planning Manager Jason Zimmerman and
Administrative Assistant Lisa Wittman. Commissioner Black was absent
1. Approval of Minutes
April 16, 2018, Special Planning Commission Meeting
MOVED
by Segelbaum, seconded by Brookins and motion carried unanimously to
approve the April 16, 2018, minutes as submitted.
April 23, 2018, Regular Planning Commission Meeting
MOVED
by Segelbaum, seconded by Angell and motion carried unanimously to approve
the April 23, 2018, minutes as submitted.
2. Comp Plan – Review Full Draft
Zimmerman stated that a complete draft of the updated Comp Plan is now ready for
review on the City’s website. He stated that it is anticipated that the City Council will
release the draft document for public comment at their May 15 meeting. After it is
released for public comment there is a 60-day public review and comment period and a
six month review period for adjacent communities and jurisdictions, including Met
Council’s preliminary review. Baker asked if the City Council’s motion will be to approve
the public review period. Zimmerman said yes. Baker asked if the Planning Commission
will review other communities’ Comp Plans. Zimmerman said staff will be reviewing other
communities’ plans, but that the links will be available if the Planning Commission would
like to see other communities’ plans. Baker asked if staff would give the Planning
Commission a synopsis of the other communities’ plans. Zimmerman said he could do
that. Baker asked if the Planning Commission will see the public comments made about
the Comp Plan. Zimmerman stated that there will be an appendix of the public comments
and the responses.
Zimmerman reviewed the Comp Plan with the Commissioners and stated that the theme
is Suburban Evolution. The Plan includes seven chapters/elements, a 10-year policy plan
with goals and objectives, a five year implementation plan with actions, an annual staff
work plan, and the Capital Improvement Program. He explained that the Plan has a broad
focus on: strengthening downtown, promoting sustainability, expanding transportation
options, supporting diversity of population, and investing in infrastructure.
Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission
May 14, 2018
Page 2
Zimmerman noted that each chapter includes an introduction, key points, history, existing
conditions, a policy plan, and an implementation plan. He added that promotion of the
Comp Plan will be done via mailings, newsletters, the City’s website, Facebook, and
cable television and that additional edits and refining of the Plan will occur over the
summer.
Segelbaum asked if there will be instructions for residents on how to provide comments.
Zimmerman said yes, there will be a comment form on the City’s website along with a
phone number and email address.
Baker asked if there will be any more public forums. Zimmerman said there won’t be any
more open houses, but there will be promotion including attendance at summer events.
Johnson said the draft Comp Plan looks good, but some of the key points in the chapters
seem a little soft. He said he recalls that the Planning Commission discussions were to
make the goals stronger and more quantifiable.
Blum referred to goal 2.5 in the housing chapter and noted that it encourages accessory
dwelling units. He said he recalls the City and the public rejecting that idea so calling out
this specific type of housing might not be the best way to get multi-generational living
opportunities. Zimmerman stated that staff has had a lot of feedback from people wanting
accessory dwelling units and that the City Council would like staff to research them. He
added that the accessory units that the City rejected last year were temporary health care
dwellings. Blum stated that the Comp Plan is supposed to be used to drive policy and that
there has been discussion in the past about this very specific type of housing. He said he
is concerned about ending up with flag lot designs and that the message from the
subdivision moratorium was clear that people don’t want houses and lot sizes squeezed
too small. Zimmerman noted that accessory dwelling units could allow units to be located
within existing structures as well. Baker agreed that it is worth looking at any research
regarding accessory dwelling units. Blum suggested changing the goal to read “research
opportunities for multi-generational living opportunities” and take out that one prescribed
type of housing. Zimmerman suggested the language be changed to say “research
opportunities to expand multi-generational housing.”
Johnson referred to the key point in the transportation chapter regarding the City’s
Pavement Management Program (PMP) evolving into a more comprehensive
Infrastructure Renewal Program (IRP) and said he remembers discussing something
more robust and not as soft. Zimmerman explained that the current PMP is just about
pavement and that there are only a few years left in the existing program so there is
overlap before the IRP starts. He added that there is more robust language in the water
resources chapter.
Johnson referred to the last key point in the housing chapter that states that the benefits
and impacts of construction activity in single family neighborhoods must be balanced with
proper City oversight. He questioned the point of that statement and if that is a given.
Zimmerman said that key point is a way to state that there is going to be some teardown
Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission
May 14, 2018
Page 3
construction that requires proper oversight. Baker questioned if the word “balanced” is the
right word. Segelbaum suggested saying that impacts of construction must be balanced
with public needs or public good. Zimmerman said he would work on the language in that
key point. He asked the Commissioners to send staff comments as they continue to
review the Comp Plan.
3. 2017-18 Recodification of City Code
Zimmerman explained that as an effort to clean-up outdated language in the City Code
and to create consistency in references and between sections, staff has been working
with the City Clerk to prepare for a recodification. He stated that the City Council will be
considering the first draft of the recodification in June and it will be brought back to the
Planning Commission for a public hearing in late summer.
Baker asked if the Council would see the proposed code changes before the Planning
Commission. Zimmerman said yes, and added that the Planning Commission has already
discussed a number of items proposed to be changed such as outdoor storage, average
grade language in the R-1 and R-2 zoning districts, and height limits.
Segelbaum referred to the extra height allowed for senior living units in the R-4 zoning
district and asked if that will be allowed in the R-3 zoning district as well. Zimmerman said
yes, and added that upper limits will be added as well.
Baker referred to the proposed list of changes and asked why some of them were bolded.
Zimmerman stated that the bolded items are more substantial changes. Baker asked if
plain language could be used as much as possible.
Blum asked about the requirements regarding the screening of items stored in a side
yard. Zimmerman stated that items stored in a side yard will be required to be 5 feet away
from the property line and screened with a 75% opaque screen, with either fencing or
vegetative screening.
Zimmerman stated that the City Council is interested is considering materials standards
for commercial and office developments. He clarified that this does not mean architectural
style, but rather materials used. He added that the Council is also interested is looking at
impervious surfaces amounts, sign code requirements, and a sunset date for gravel
driveways.
4. Annual Board/Commission Orientation
Zimmerman showed the Commissioners a PowerPoint presentation and discussed the
Golden Valley organizational chart, the Board and Commission structure, the open
meeting law, the role of the Commission, the guiding principles and core values, and the
standards of conduct.
Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission
May 14, 2018
Page 4
5. Election of Officers
MOVED by Segelbaum, seconded by Blum, and motion carried unanimously to elect
Baker as Chair.
MOVED by Baker, seconded by Segelbaum, and motion carried unanimously to elect
Johnson as Vice Chair.
MOVED by Segelbaum, seconded by Johnson, and motion carried unanimously to elect
Blum as Secretary.
6. Council Liaison Report
Council Member Schmidgall stated that the public hearing for Meadowbrook's proposed
PUD amendment is scheduled for the May 15 City Council meeting.
Schmidgall thanked the Planning Commission for their work on the Comp Plan update
and said that he thinks the Plan is more useful and more approachable than the current
Comp Plan. He said he is particularly excited about the Douglas Drive changes and the
Bike and Pedestrian plans.
Schmidgall stated that the Global Pointe project is moving forward and that he is
pleased with what the City has been doing in regard to affordable housing.
Johnson asked if the Planning Commission has ever thought about framing their
agendas for the year in order to discuss things they'd like to see or things they think are
important. Segelbaum said he likes that idea and suggested having a brainstorming
meeting. Blum suggested that the Commissioners present ideas they are passionate
about so it doesn't take staff time or time away from public business. Angell stated that
issues discussed at the resident's open forum at the Council meetings could be passed
on to the Planning Commission. Baker suggested the Commissioners compile a list of
ideas they'd like to discuss.
7. Adjournment
The meeting was adjourned at 8:15 pm.
�
Vv ��
on um, Secre ary Lisa Wittman, Administrative Assistant