The URL can be used to link to this page

06-19-18 CC Agenda Packet (entire) AGENDA Regular Meeting of the City Council Golden Valley City Hall 7800 Golden Valley Road Council Chamber June 19, 2018 6:30 pm 1. CALL TO ORDER PAGES A. Pledge of Allegiance B. Roll Call C. Receipt of Community Partnership Grant from CenterPoint Energy 18-40 3-4 D. Proclamation for Golden Valley Fire Department 75th Anniversary 5-6 2. ADDITIONS AND CORRECTIONS TO AGENDA 3. CONSENT AGENDA Approval of Consent Agenda - All items listed under this heading are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no discussion of these items unless a Council Member so requests in which event the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda. A. Approval of Minutes: 1. Council/Manager Meeting - April 10, 2018 7-8 2. City Council Meeting - June 5, 2018 9-12 B. Approval of City Check Register 13 C. Licenses: 1. 2018-2019 Liquor License Renewal 14 D. Minutes of Boards and Commissions: 1. Planning Commission - May 14, 2018 15-18 2. Human Services Fund - May 14, 2018 19-20 E. Bids and Quotes: 1. Approve Purchase of Fire Rescue Vehicle 21-40 2. Authorize Watermain Gate Valve Repairs 41 F. Acceptance of Donation from Golden Valley Federated Women’s Club 18-41 42-43 G. Authorize Contract with Corrective Asphalt Materials, Inc. for 2018 Pavement Preservation Project 44-48 H. Receipt of May 2018 Financial Reports 49-62 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Public Hearing - MS4 General Permit, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program, 2017 Annual Report to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 18-42 63-65 B. Public Hearing - Amend the General Land Use Plan Map - 5530-5540 Golden Valley Road and 1530 Welcome Ave N (withdrawn) 66 C. Public Hearing - Amend the Official Zoning Map - 5530-5540 Golden Valley Road and 1530 Welcome Ave N (withdrawn) 67 D. Public Hearing - Minor Subdivision - 7040 Glenwood Avenue 68-83 E. Public Hearing - Ordinance #640 - RLT Second Addition PUD No. 91, Amendment 4 - 8905 Wayzata Boulevard 84-118 F. Public Hearing - Amendment to the General Land Use Plan Map - 2429 Douglas Drive 18-43 119-133 G. Public Hearing - Ordinance #641 - Amendment to the Official Zoning Map for 2429 Douglas Drive 134-157 Page 2 June 19, 2018 5. OLD BUSINESS 6. NEW BUSINESS All Ordinances listed under this heading are eligible for public input. A. Second Consideration - Ordinance #639 - Amending the 2018 Master Fee Schedule for Legal Review 158-159 B. Review of Council Calendar C. Mayor and Council Communications 7. ADJOURNMENT Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting June 19, 2018 Agenda Item 1. C. Community Partnership Grant from CenterPoint Energy Prepared By Ted Massicotte, Deputy Fire Chief Summary The Fire Department made application for, and was awarded a $2,000 Community Partnership Grant offered by CenterPoint Energy. The grant will be used toward the purchase of new multi- gas monitoring meters as well as calibration equipment for those meters. A representative from CenterPoint Energy will be at the meeting to present the grant. Attachment • Resolution Accepting Grant from CenterPoint Community Partnership Grant (1 page) Recommended Action Motion to adopt Resolution accepting Grant from CenterPoint Community Partnership. Resolution 18-40 June 19, 2018 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION ACCEPTING GRANT FROM CENTERPOINT ENERGY COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution 04-20 on March 16, 2004 which established a policy for the receipt of gifts; and WHEREAS, the Resolution states that a gift of real or personal property must be accepted by the City Council by resolution and be approved by a two-thirds majority of the Council. All donations and grant must be acknowledged and accepted by motion with a simple majority. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council accepts the following donation: 1. $2,000 from CenterPoint Energy Community Partnership Grant, for the purchase of multi-gas monitoring meters which includes calibration equipment for those meters. _____________________________ Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: _____________________________ Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by the City Clerk. Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting June 19, 2018 Agenda Item 1. D. Proclamation for the 75th Anniversary of the Golden Valley Fire Department Prepared By John Crelly, Fire Chief Summary In 1943, after a fire at Mrs. Lynde’s home which was extinguished with the help of her neighbors, a group of ordinary Citizens banded together and worked with the Village council to form the Golden Valley Fire Department. Since that time more than 400 citizens have stepped forward to serve their community in an extraordinary way. They have served with dedication, respect, integrity and honor. We celebrate this year the accomplishments of the firefighters who have served as we mark the 75th Anniversary of the Golden Valley Fire Department. Attachment: • Proclamation for the 75th Anniversary of the Golden Valley Fire Department (1 page) Recommended Action Motion to adopt a Proclamation for the 75th Anniversary of the Golden Valley Fire Department. CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY PROCLAMATION FOR THE 75TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE GOLDEN VALLEY FIRE DEPARTMENT WHEREAS, the Village of Golden Valley adopted an Ordinance on March 2, 1943 establishing a Volunteer Fire Department; and WHEREAS, nearly 400 ordinary citizens have stepped forward over the 75-year history of the Golden Valley Fire Department to serve their community on an unscheduled, part-time basis, operating out of three fire stations; and WHEREAS, the necessary firefighting equipment and superior staffing of the Golden Valley Fire Department has recently earned the City an Insurance Service Office (ISO) rating of 2, placing Golden Valley among the top seven fire departments in Minnesota to achieve this rating; and WHEREAS, the commitment and dedication of the members of the Golden Valley Fire Department spend hundreds of tireless hours in emergency response, training and community education each year in an effort to protect, serve and educate the public has qualified the City of Golden Valley as a Heart Safe Community; and WHEREAS, the Golden Valley City Council has demonstrated a long history dedication and investment in the safety of its citizens, employees and guests through its strong support of the Golden Valley Fire Department. NOW , THEREFORE, let it be known, that the Mayor and City Council of the City of Golden Valley hereby recognize the 75th Anniversary of the Golden Valley Fire Department and ask all to join in celebrating this commemorative occasion and urge all citizens to express appreciation for its contributions to Golden Valley and the greater community. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the great seal of the City of Golden Valley to be affixed this 19th day of June, 2018. __________________________ Shepard M. Harris, Mayor OFFICIAL MINUTES COUNCIL/MANAGER MEETING GOLDEN VALLEY, MINNESOTA April 10, 2018 The meeting began at 6:30 pm in the Council Conference Room. Present: Mayor Harris and Council Members: Clausen, Fonnest, Rosenquist and Schmidgall. Also present were: City Manager Cruikshank, Physical Development Director Nevinski, Planning Manager Zimmerman, City Engineering Oliver, Finance Director Virnig, Associate Planner/Grant Writer Goellner, and Development and Assets Coordinator Eckman. Commission Annual Reports – Planning Commission 2017 Annual Report Planning Commission Vice Chair Andy Johnson and Planning Manager Zimmerman presented the 2017 Annual Report and answered questions from the Council. Commission Annual Report – Board of Zoning Appeals 2017 Annual Report Associate Planner/Grant Writer Goellner presented the Board of Zoning Appeals 2017 Annual Report and answered questions from the Council. Update on DeCola Ponds B & C Project Development and Assets Coordinator Eckman and City Engineering Oliver presented an updated on the DeCola Ponds B 7 C Projects. The presentation included updates on the long-term flood mitigation plan background, flooding impacts, study and plan, progress to date, concept plans, and next steps. Highway 169 Mobility Study Implementation Plan Associate Planner/Grant Writer Goellner and Council Member Schmidgall updated the Council on the Highway 169 Mobility Study Implementation Plan and answered questions from the Council. Items discussed were the Highway 55 Bus Rapid Transit (BRT), Interim Bus Service and Safety Improvements at Betty Crocker Drive/Highway 55/I-394. The formal Highway 169 Mobility Study Implementation Plan will be received and filed at a future City Council Meeting. Review Process for Discussion of Organized Garbage Collection Physical Development Director Nevinski presented an outline of the process for a community discussion regarding residential waste hauling. Physical Development Director Nevinski and City Manager Cruikshank answered questions from the Council. After discussion the Council, the Council identified the following goals for waste collection in the City: options and flexibility on services, cost neutral to city, preserve conditions of streets, reduce noise, minimize environmental impact, improve safety, more affordable to residents, Official Council/Manager Minutes -2- April 10, 2018 reduce trucks on street, comply with other agency goals, and retain choice. The Council also discussed the process and consensus was to conduct a fair and even discussion, getting resident input, strive for excellence and be a leader, and complete the process to a natural conclusion. 2017 Positive Performance - General Fund Transfer and Assignment of Fund Balance Finance Director Virnig reviewed the General Fund Balance and answered questions from the Council. At the next meeting the Council will consider a resolution authorizing a transfer from the General Fund to the Equipment Replacement Fund. Council Review of Future Draft Agendas: Housing & Redevelopment Authority April 17, City Council April 17, City Council May 1 and Council/Manager May 8, 2018 Sister City Program will be added to the May 8 Council/Manager meeting. No other changes were made. Staff will contact the Council regarding conducting individual meetings with each Council Member to discuss the City Code revisions. The meeting adjourned at 10 pm. _______________________________ Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: _____________________________ Judy Nally, Administrative Assistant UNOFFICIAL MINUTES CITY COUNCIL MEETING GOLDEN VALLEY, MINNESOTA June 5, 2018 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Harris called the meeting to order at 6:30 pm. 1A. Pledge of Allegiance 1B. Roll Call Present: Mayor Harris, Council Members Joanie Clausen, Larry Fonnest, Gillian Rosenquist and Steve Schmidgall. Also present were: City Manager Cruikshank and City Clerk Luedke. 1C. Presentation: Minnesota Recreation and Parks Association Awards of Excellence for Schaper Park Challenge Course & All-Inclusive Playground and for Brookview Mr. Birno, Parks and Recreation Director, introduced Ms. Cindy Walsh, City of St. Louis Park Parks & Recreation Director representing the Minnesota Recreation and Parks Association. Ms. Walsh presented the Awards of Excellence to the City of Golden Valley for Schaper Park and the new Brookview. Council thanked the Minnesota Recreation and Parks Association for awards. 2. ADDITIONS AND CORRECTIONS TO AGENDA MOTION made by Council Member Schmidgall, seconded by Council Member Clausen to approve the agenda of June 5, 2018, as submitted and the motion carried. 3. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA MOTION made by Council Member Clausen, seconded by Council Member Schmidgall to approve the consent agenda of June 5, 2018, as revised: removal of 3H-Approve extension of hours for the Golden Valley Fire Relief Association Street Dance and the motion carried. 3A. Approve Minutes of City Council Meeting - May 15, 2018. 3B. Approve City Check Register and authorize the payments of the bills as submitted. 3C1. Approve the renewal of the respective liquor licenses for the applicants listed below for the license period of July 1, 2018, through June 30, 2019: Off-Sale: Golden Valley Liquor Barrel, Lunds & Byerly’s Wines & Spirits, Lakeridge Wine & Spirits and Cedar Lake Wine On-Sale and Sunday Sale/Off-Sale: Schuller’s Tavern Wine On-Sale (including strong beer) and 3.2 Malt Liquor: D’Amico and Sons, Davanni’s Pizza & Hoagies, New Bohemia Golden Valley, Ramada Golden Valley, Smashburgers and The Early Bird Cafe - Mort’s Deli Off-Sale 3.2 Malt liquor: Holiday Inn Express Golden Valley, Super America #4443 and Super America #4497 On-Sale and Sunday Sale: Benihana, Brookview Golf Course, Chipotle Mexican Grill, Doolittle’s Woodfire Grill, Golden Valley Country Club, Good Day Café, J.J.’s Clubhouse, Metropolitan Ballroom and Clubhouse, Red Lobster, Schuller’s Tavern and Teresa’s Mexican Restaurant On-Sale: Sodexo America Unofficial City Council Minutes -2- June 5, 2018 3. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA - continued 3C2. Authorize the issuance of a multi-family rental license to Rutter 4-plex, 2425 Mendelssohn Avenue North. 3D. Accept for filing the Minutes of Boards and Commissions as follows: 1. Special Planning Commission - April 16, 2018 2. Planning Commission - April 23, 2018 3. Human Services Fund - April 9, 2018 4. Environmental Commission - April 23, 2018 5. Human Rights Commission - April 24, 2018 6. Police Civil Service Commission - March 8 and April 9, 2018 7. Bassett Creek Water Management Commission - April 19, 2018 3E1. Award a contract for the Schaper Park Shelter Roof Replacement Project to Flag Builders in the amount of $23,760. 3F. Authorize an agreement with Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C., Super Law Group, LLC and Gray Plant Mooty, Mooty & Bennett, P.A. regarding litigation. 3G. Adopt Resolution 18-37, approving the Minnesota Department of Transportation Cooperative Construction Agreement for the construction of the intersection of Golden Valley Road/Decatur Avenue North and Trunk Highway 55. 3H. Approve extension of hours for the Golden Valley Fire Relief Association Street Dance. 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA 3H. Extension of Hours for the Golden Valley Fire Relief Association Street Dance Council discussed the upcoming event and encouraged the public to attend. MOTION made by Council Member Rosenquist, seconded by Council Member Clausen to approve the extension of hours for the Golden Valley Fire Relief Association Street Dance to midnight on Saturday, June 23, 2018, at the Chester Bird American Legion, 200 North Lilac Drive and the motion carried. 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS 5. OLD BUSINESS 6. NEW BUSINESS 6A. Consideration of Public Art Proposal Graphic Designer/Web Specialist Fuhrman presented the staff report and answered questions from Council. City Manager Cruikshank answered questions from Council. Ms. Eve Clarkson provided background information regarding Peace Poles. She said she would be selling jars of Peace Soup in different languages to raise money for the project and answered questions from Council. Ms. Juliana Clarkson was also in attendance and answered questions from Council. There was Council discussion regarding the Public Art Proposal that was submitted. MOTION made by Council Member Clausen, seconded by Council Member Rosenquist to approve the recommended Peace Pole art submission, enter a 30-day public review and comment period to start after final concept is received, followed by installation and the motion carried. Unofficial City Council Minutes -3- June 5, 2018 6B. City Attorney 1. Consideration of Appointment of City Attorney 2. Consideration of Amendment to the General Fund Budget 3. First Consideration of Ordinance amending the 2018 Fee Schedule City Manager Cruikshank presented the staff report and stated that a Special Council/Manager meeting was held before the City Council meeting to discuss this topic. He answered questions from Council. There was Council discussion regarding the options of staying with the current service provider, going through a request for proposal process or appointing an in-house attorney. MOTION made by Council Member Clausen, seconded by Council Member Schmidgall to adopt Resolution 18-38, appointing Maria Cisneros as the City Attorney upon a vote being taken the following voted in favor of: Clausen, Harris and Schmidgall, the following voted against: Fonnest and Rosenquist and the motion carried. MOTION made by Council Member Clausen, seconded by Council Member Schmidgall to adopt Resolution 18-39, amending the 2018 Budget of the General Fund upon a vote being taken the following voted in favor of: Clausen, Fonnest, Harris, Rosenquist and Schmidgall, the following voted against: none and the motion carried. MOTION made by Council Member Clausen, seconded by Council Member Schmidgall to adopt the first consideration of Ordinance 639, amending the 2018 Master Fee Schedule for Legal Review upon a vote being taken the following voted in favor of: Clausen, Fonnest, Harris, Rosenquist and Schmidgall, the following voted against: none and the motion carried. 6C. Review of Council Calendar Some Council Members may attend the Loppet Adventure Center on June 8, 2018, at 10:30 am at 1221 Theodore Wirth Parkway. The Views of the Valley Photo deadline is June 8, 2018, at 4:30 pm. Some Council Members may attend the Golden Valley Pride Interfaith Religious Worship Service on June 10, 2018, at 10:30 am at Spirit of Hope United Methodist located at 7600 Harold Avenue. Some Council Members may attend the Golden Valley Pride Festival on June 10, 2018, from noon to 6 pm at Brookview Park. A Concert in the Park featuring the Stompin Dixie will be held on June 11, 2018, at 7 pm at Brookview Park. The next Council/Manager meeting will be held on June 12, 2018, at 6:30 pm. A Firefighter Recruitment Expo will be held on June 14, 2018, from 6 to 10 pm at Fire Station 1. The first Water Day at Scheid Park will be held on June 15, 2018, from 12:30 to 2 pm. Some Council Members may attend the Market in the Valley on June 17, 2018, from 9 am to 1 pm in the City Hall Campus Parking Lot. Unofficial City Council Minutes -4- June 5, 2018 6C. Review of Council Calendar - continued A Concert in the Park featuring the Srazhalys will be held on June 18, 2018, at 7 pm at Brookview Park. The next City Council meeting will be held on June 19, 2018, at 6:30 pm. Some Council Members may attend the Golden Valley Open House on June 20, 2018, from 6 to 8 pm at the Golden Valley Police Department and Fire Station 1. Some Council Members may attend the Golden Valley Fire Relief Street Dance on June 23, 2018, from 5 pm to midnight at the Chester Bird American Legion located at 200 North Lilac Drive. 6D. Mayor and Council Communication Council Member Clausen provided event details for the upcoming Pride Festival and encouraged the public to attend. Council Member Fonnest stated that the festival is a privately funded event. Council Member Schmidgall said he had the honor of participating in the Memorial Day Service at the Chester Bird American Legion. He said he also recently attended the city hall in Kirkwood, Missouri where members of the City Council and staff were killed by an angry contractor. He said that the City had established a memorial path honoring them and he added that when we think about people giving their lives for service, we should also think about members who gave their lives for their community. Council Member Clausen said she also attended the Memorial Service at Chester Bird and thanked the Legion and the other committee members that attended. Mayor Harris thanked the Beyond the Yellow Ribbon Committee for the event. Council Member Rosenquist thanked Sergeant Giese for putting up flags in honor of Memorial Day. Mayor Harris and City Manager Cruikshank provided an update on the construction in front of City Hall and on east Golden Valley Road. 7. ADJOURNMENT MOTION made by Council Member Clausen, seconded by Council Member Schmidgall and the motion carried to adjourn the meeting at 7:31 pm. _______________________________ Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: __________________________ Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting June 19, 2018 Agenda Item 3. B. Approval of City Check Register Prepared By Sue Virnig, Finance Director Summary Approval of the check register for various vendor claims against the City of Golden Valley. Attachments • Document sent via email Recommended Action Motion to authorize the payment of the bills as submitted. Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting June 19, 2018 Agenda Item 3. C. 1. 2018-2019 Liquor License Renewal Prepared By Kris Luedke, City Clerk Summary The following establishment has applied for renewal of their liquor license for the 2018-2019 license term and has met City Code and State requirements for the renewal of their license. On-Sale Wine (including strong beer) Olivia’s Organic Café & Event Center 1301 Theodore Wirth Parkway Recommended Action Motion to approve the renewal of the liquor license for the applicant listed above for the license period of July 1, 2018, through June 30, 2019. Regular Meeting of the Golden Valley Planning Commission May 14, 2018 A regular meeting of the Planning Commission was held at the Golden Valley City Hall, Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota, on Monday, May 14, 2018. Chair Baker called the meeting to order at 7 pm. Those present were Planning Commissioners Angell, Baker, Blum, Brookins, Johnson, Pockl, and Segelbaum. Also present were Planning Manager Jason Zimmerman and Administrative Assistant Lisa Wittman. Commissioner Black was absent 1. Approval of Minutes April 16, 2018, Special Planning Commission Meeting MOVED by Segelbaum, seconded by Brookins and motion carried unanimously to approve the April 16, 2018, minutes as submitted. April 23, 2018, Regular Planning Commission Meeting MOVED by Segelbaum, seconded by Angell and motion carried unanimously to approve the April 23, 2018, minutes as submitted. 2. Comp Plan – Review Full Draft Zimmerman stated that a complete draft of the updated Comp Plan is now ready for review on the City’s website. He stated that it is anticipated that the City Council will release the draft document for public comment at their May 15 meeting. After it is released for public comment there is a 60-day public review and comment period and a six month review period for adjacent communities and jurisdictions, including Met Council’s preliminary review. Baker asked if the City Council’s motion will be to approve the public review period. Zimmerman said yes. Baker asked if the Planning Commission will review other communities’ Comp Plans. Zimmerman said staff will be reviewing other communities’ plans, but that the links will be available if the Planning Commission would like to see other communities’ plans. Baker asked if staff would give the Planning Commission a synopsis of the other communities’ plans. Zimmerman said he could do that. Baker asked if the Planning Commission will see the public comments made about the Comp Plan. Zimmerman stated that there will be an appendix of the public comments and the responses. Zimmerman reviewed the Comp Plan with the Commissioners and stated that the theme is Suburban Evolution. The Plan includes seven chapters/elements, a 10-year policy plan with goals and objectives, a five year implementation plan with actions, an annual staff work plan, and the Capital Improvement Program. He explained that the Plan has a broad focus on: strengthening downtown, promoting sustainability, expanding transportation options, supporting diversity of population, and investing in infrastructure. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission May 14, 2018 Page 2 Zimmerman noted that each chapter includes an introduction, key points, history, existing conditions, a policy plan, and an implementation plan. He added that promotion of the Comp Plan will be done via mailings, newsletters, the City’s website, Facebook, and cable television and that additional edits and refining of the Plan will occur over the summer. Segelbaum asked if there will be instructions for residents on how to provide comments. Zimmerman said yes, there will be a comment form on the City’s website along with a phone number and email address. Baker asked if there will be any more public forums. Zimmerman said there won’t be any more open houses, but there will be promotion including attendance at summer events. Johnson said the draft Comp Plan looks good, but some of the key points in the chapters seem a little soft. He said he recalls that the Planning Commission discussions were to make the goals stronger and more quantifiable. Blum referred to goal 2.5 in the housing chapter and noted that it encourages accessory dwelling units. He said he recalls the City and the public rejecting that idea so calling out this specific type of housing might not be the best way to get multi-generational living opportunities. Zimmerman stated that staff has had a lot of feedback from people wanting accessory dwelling units and that the City Council would like staff to research them. He added that the accessory units that the City rejected last year were temporary health care dwellings. Blum stated that the Comp Plan is supposed to be used to drive policy and that there has been discussion in the past about this very specific type of housing. He said he is concerned about ending up with flag lot designs and that the message from the subdivision moratorium was clear that people don’t want houses and lot sizes squeezed too small. Zimmerman noted that accessory dwelling units could allow units to be located within existing structures as well. Baker agreed that it is worth looking at any research regarding accessory dwelling units. Blum suggested changing the goal to read “research opportunities for multi-generational living opportunities” and take out that one prescribed type of housing. Zimmerman suggested the language be changed to say “research opportunities to expand multi-generational housing.” Johnson referred to the key point in the transportation chapter regarding the City’s Pavement Management Program (PMP) evolving into a more comprehensive Infrastructure Renewal Program (IRP) and said he remembers discussing something more robust and not as soft. Zimmerman explained that the current PMP is just about pavement and that there are only a few years left in the existing program so there is overlap before the IRP starts. He added that there is more robust language in the water resources chapter. Johnson referred to the last key point in the housing chapter that states that the benefits and impacts of construction activity in single family neighborhoods must be balanced with proper City oversight. He questioned the point of that statement and if that is a given. Zimmerman said that key point is a way to state that there is going to be some teardown Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission May 14, 2018 Page 3 construction that requires proper oversight. Baker questioned if the word “balanced” is the right word. Segelbaum suggested saying that impacts of construction must be balanced with public needs or public good. Zimmerman said he would work on the language in that key point. He asked the Commissioners to send staff comments as they continue to review the Comp Plan. 3. 2017-18 Recodification of City Code Zimmerman explained that as an effort to clean-up outdated language in the City Code and to create consistency in references and between sections, staff has been working with the City Clerk to prepare for a recodification. He stated that the City Council will be considering the first draft of the recodification in June and it will be brought back to the Planning Commission for a public hearing in late summer. Baker asked if the Council would see the proposed code changes before the Planning Commission. Zimmerman said yes, and added that the Planning Commission has already discussed a number of items proposed to be changed such as outdoor storage, average grade language in the R-1 and R-2 zoning districts, and height limits. Segelbaum referred to the extra height allowed for senior living units in the R-4 zoning district and asked if that will be allowed in the R-3 zoning district as well. Zimmerman said yes, and added that upper limits will be added as well. Baker referred to the proposed list of changes and asked why some of them were bolded. Zimmerman stated that the bolded items are more substantial changes. Baker asked if plain language could be used as much as possible. Blum asked about the requirements regarding the screening of items stored in a side yard. Zimmerman stated that items stored in a side yard will be required to be 5 feet away from the property line and screened with a 75% opaque screen, with either fencing or vegetative screening. Zimmerman stated that the City Council is interested is considering materials standards for commercial and office developments. He clarified that this does not mean architectural style, but rather materials used. He added that the Council is also interested is looking at impervious surfaces amounts, sign code requirements, and a sunset date for gravel driveways. 4. Annual Board/Commission Orientation Zimmerman showed the Commissioners a PowerPoint presentation and discussed the Golden Valley organizational chart, the Board and Commission structure, the open meeting law, the role of the Commission, the guiding principles and core values, and the standards of conduct. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission May 14, 2018 Page 4 5. Election of Officers MOVED by Segelbaum, seconded by Blum, and motion carried unanimously to elect Baker as Chair. MOVED by Baker, seconded by Segelbaum, and motion carried unanimously to elect Johnson as Vice Chair. MOVED by Segelbaum, seconded by Johnson, and motion carried unanimously to elect Blum as Secretary. 6. Council Liaison Report Council Member Schmidgall stated that the public hearing for Meadowbrook’s proposed PUD amendment is scheduled for the May 15 City Council meeting. Schmidgall thanked the Planning Commission for their work on the Comp Plan update and said that he thinks the Plan is more useful and more approachable than the current Comp Plan. He said he is particularly excited about the Douglas Drive changes and the Bike and Pedestrian plans. Schmidgall stated that the Global Pointe project is moving forward and that he is pleased with what the City has been doing in regard to affordable housing. Johnson asked if the Planning Commission has ever thought about framing their agendas for the year in order to discuss things they’d like to see or things they think are important. Segelbaum said he likes that idea and suggested having a brainstorming meeting. Blum suggested that the Commissioners present ideas they are passionate about so it doesn’t take staff time or time away from public business. Angell stated that issues discussed at the resident’s open forum at the Council meetings could be passed on to the Planning Commission. Baker suggested the Commissioners compile a list of ideas they’d like to discuss. 7. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 8:15 pm. ____________________________ __________________________ Ron Blum, Secretary Lisa Wittman, Administrative Assistant Golden Valley Human Services Fund (GVHSF) Meeting Minutes May 14,2018 Present: Denise La Mere -Anderson, Aaron Black, Hilmer Erickson, Peder Hanson, Katie Hart, Alan Ingber and Jason Kapel Also present: Brian Erickson, Staff Liaison. Absent: Stephanie Devitt, Elissa Heilicher and Sophia Vento Call to Order: La Mere -Anderson called the meeting to order at 6:49 pm. Agenda Changes or Additions: Council Dinner and Thanking Alan Ingber, were added. April 9, 2018: Erickson moved and Black seconded the motion to approve the minutes from April 9. The motion passed unanimously. Introduction of new member: La Mere Anderson introduced new member, Jason Kapel. Jason shared information about himself and reason for joining the commission. Commissioner Orientation: Staff Liaison, Erickson, administered the new commissioner orientation. It was well received by the members and will be conducted yearly. Election of Chair and Vice Chair: Commission members voted and selected Aaron Black as Chair and Denise La -Mere Anderson as Vice Chair. Budget Update: Staff Liaison, Erickson, distributed latest budget information, which was shared and reviewed. Run the Valley Review: Shirts— Participants really liked the shirts. It was suggested to look at adding a youth size, for younger runners. Race Headquarters — Brookview worked well. Suggested to use upper level for runner check-in next year. Hanson recommend better signage for runners with start/end locations and general information. Registration — La Mere — Anderson expressed that it was confusing for runners with regards to the check- in process. The possibility of using a different registration system would make this more efficient and should be explored. La Mere Anderson suggested doing away with the U12 Runner option, as it is confusing for everyone. Volunteers - Volunteer participation was good and we had a few too many, for the amount of positions. Hanson suggested there should be talking points developed for the various positions. Food — There was plenty of food donated by sponsors. La Mere Anderson shared how there was left over food and maybe request less for next year. The hallway area, for food distribution, worked well. Adding music, when participants were eating and relaxing post run, was suggested by Hanson. Kids Fun Run - La Mere Anderson suggested a balloon arch and doing a little more for this run. Route_7 Hanson suggested better signage and flow between Xenia and Turners Crossroad, on Laurel. Runners are traveling in opposite directions in this area, and it is confusing and not signed well. Bylaw Change Proposal: Name Change -A name change to Human Services Commission was discussed and agreed upon. Size and makeup of Commission_ — It was proposed to have the size of the commission as 7 residents and up to 9, if filled by business members. Reserve Spend Down —The members reviewed the agreed upon proposal for spend down. a. Maintain reserves at a minimum threshold of 1.5 time's annual budget and maximum of 2.0 of annual budget. b. When reserves exceed thresholds, exercise reserve spend down. Golf and Lawn Bowling Classic: Staff Liaison, Erickson, reminded members of the new fall date for the event, which is Monday, September 17. It was agreed to discuss planning details at the June meeting. Other Business: Commission Member Resignation — Commission, Alan Ingber, was thanked for his service. Council Dinner: Staff Liaison, Erickson, reminded members of the Council Dinner on Tuesday, May 29, at Brookview. Adjourned: Erickson motioned, Hart seconded. Meeting adjourned at 8:41 pm Respectfully submitted, Denise La -Mere Anderson, GVHSF Chair Brian Erickson, Staff Liaison Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting June 19, 2018 Agenda Item 3. E. 1. Approve Purchase of Fire Rescue Vehicle Prepared By John Crelly, Fire Chief Tim Kieffer, Public Works Maintenance Manager Marshall Beugen, Street and Vehicle Maintenance Supervisor Summary The 2018 Vehicle and Equipment Capital Improvement Program (CIP) includes $90,000 for the purchase of a Fire Department Rescue Vehicle (V&E-060). Council approved the purchase of the rescue vehicle on April 17, 2018. The state contract expires on October 31, 2018, or at the end of the manufacturer’s model year, whichever comes first. However, the model year ended before the chassis was ordered and the new state contract has not yet been awarded. Subsequently, staff looked for other options and now recommends purchasing the chassis using the National Joint Powers Alliance (NJPA) to expedite the replacement purchase. The NJPA has awarded the following contract: Contract No. Item Vendor Amount 120716-NAF 2018 Ford F-350 4x4 XLT Crew Cab National Auto Fleet Group $41,494 Staff solicited quotes for the purchase of the body and setup. The results are as follows: Item Vendor Amount Highland Rescue Body ABM Equipment & Supply $47,168 Highland Rescue Body BFX Fire Apparatus $49,475 Total Purchase Price (Chassis, Cab, Body, and Setup) $88,662 Attachments • National Auto Fleet Group Quote (8 pages) • ABM Equipment & Supply Quote (9 pages) • BFX Fire Apparatus Quote (1 page) Recommended Action Motion to approve purchase of a 2018 Ford F-350 4x4 XLT Crew Cab from National Auto Fleet Group in the amount of $41,494. Motion to approve purchase of a Highland Rescue Body from ABM Equipment & Supply in the amount of $47,168. Sc11, service, and deliver letter Page 1 of 8 exo - National Auto Fleet Group t A Division of Chevrolet of Watsonville 490 Auto Center Drive, Watsonville, CA 95076 (855) 289-6572 - (855) BUY-NJPA - (831 ) 4BO-8497 Fax Fleet@NationalAutoFleetGroup.com 5/24/2018 Quotel D: 13843 Order Cut Off Date: TBA MARSHALL BEUGEN City of Golden Valley Vehicle Maintenance 7800 Golden Valley Rd Golden Valley, Minnesota, 55427 Dear MARSHALL BEUGEN, National Auto Fleet Group is pleased to quote the following vehicle(s)for your consideration. One(1) New/Unused(2019 Ford Super Duty F-350 SRW(W3F)XLT 4WD Crew Cab 179"WB 60"CA, )and delivered to your specified location, each for One Unit Contract Price $41,494.00 Tax(0.0000%) $0.00 Tire fee $0.00 Total $41,494.00 -per the attached specifications. This vehicle(s)is available under the National Joint Powers Alliance Contract 120716-NAF Please reference this Contract number on all purchase orders to National Auto Fleet Group. Payment terms are Net 30 days after receipt of vehicle. Thank you in advance for your consideration. Should you have any questions,please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, Jesse Cooper Account Manager Email: Fleet@NationalAutoFleetGroup.com Office: (855)289-6572 Fax: (831)480-8497 Uma CHEVROLET L TOYOTA Sell, service,and deliver letter Page 2 of 8 In order to Finalize your Quote, please submit this purchase packet to your governing body for Purchase Order Approval. Once you issue a Purchase Order please send bv: Fax: (831) 480-8497 Mail: National Auto Fleet Group 490 Auto Center Drive Watsonville, CA 95076 Email: Fleetftnationalautofleetgroup.com We will then send a W-9 if you need one Please contact our main office with any questions: 1-855-289-6572 Sell, service, and deliver letter Page 3 of 8 Vehicle Configuration Options ENGINE ----_—_-- Code Description 996 ENGINE: 6.2L 2-VALVE SOHC EFI NA V8 (FLEX-FUEL), (STD) TRANSMISSION Code IDescription 44P TRANSMISSION: TORQSHIFT 6-SPEED AUTOMATIC (6R140), -inc: SelectShift(STD) WHEELS Code Description 648 WHEELS: 18"SPARKLE SILVER PAINTED CAST ALUMINUM, -inc: bright hub covers/center ornaments (STD) TIRES Code Description TDX TIRES: LT275/70RX18E BSW AT PRIMARY PAINT Code IDescription E4 IVERMILLION RED PAINT SCHEME Code Description STANDARD PAINT SEAT TYPE Code Description MEDIUM EARTH GRAY, CLOTH 40/20/40 SPLIT BENCH SEAT, -inc: 20%center under-seat 3S storage, center armrest, cupholder, storage, 4-way adjustable driver/passenger headrests and driver's side manual lumbar AXLE RATIO Code Description X4M I ELECTRONIC-LOCKING W/4.30 AXLE RATIO ADDITIONAL EQUIPMENT Code Description 17V XLT VALUE PACKAGE, -inc: SecuriCode Driver's Side Keyless Entry Keypad, 8-Way Power Driver's Seat, Autolock/Auto Unlock, Adjustable Pedals 213 4X4 ELECTRONIC-SHIFT-ON-THE-FLY(ESOF), -inc: manual-locking hubs and auto rotary control on instrument panel 67E EXTRA EXTRA HEAVY-DUTY ALTERNATOR (240 AMP) _ SNOW PLOW PREP PACKAGE, -inc: pre-selected springs(see Order Guide Supplemental 473 'Reference for springs/FGAWR of specific vehicle configurations), NOTE 1: Restrictions apply; see Supplemental Reference or Body Builders Layout Book for details, NOTE 2:Also allows for the attachment of a winch 51 D SPARE TIRE&WHEEL DELETE 18B PLATFORM RUNNING BOARDS 166 CARPET DELETE, -inc: Replaced w/black flooring 872 REAR VIEW CAMERA& PREP KIT, -inc: cab wiring 62M JADJUSTABLE PEDALS OPTION PACKAGE Code Description 633A ORDER CODE 633A Sell, service, and deliver letter Page 4 of 8 2019 FleeVNon-Retail Ford Super Duty F-350 SRW XLT 4WD Crew Cab 179" WB 60" CA WINDOW STICKER 2019 Ford Super Duty F-350 SRW XLT 4WD Crew Cab 179"WB 60"CA CODE MODEL MSRP W3F 2019 Ford Super Duty F-350 SRW XLT 4WD Crew Cab 179"WB 60"CA $44,870.00 OPTIONS 996 ENGINE:6.2L 2-VALVE SOHC EFI NA V8(FLEX-FUEL), (STD) $0.00 44P TRANSMISSION:TORCISHIFT 6-SPEED AUTOMATIC(6R140),-inc: SelectShift(STD) $0.00 648 WHEELS: 18"SPARKLE SILVER PAINTED CAST ALUMINUM,-inc: bright hub covers/center $0.00 ornaments(STD) TDX TIRES: LT275/70RX18E BSW AT $165.00 E4 VERMILLION RED $660.00 STANDARD PAINT $0.00 3S MEDIUM EARTH GRAY, CLOTH 40/20/40 SPLIT BENCH SEAT, -inc:20%center under-seat $0.00 storage,center armrest, cupholder,storage,4-way adjustable driver/passenger headrests and driver's side manual lumbar X4M ELECTRONIC-LOCKING W/4.30 AXLE RATIO $390.00 17V XLT VALUE PACKAGE, -inc: SecuriCode Driver's Side Keyless Entry Keypad, 8-Way Power Driver's $1,600.00 Seat,Autolock/Auto Unlock,Adjustable Pedals 213 4X4 ELECTRONIC-SHIFT-ON-THE-FLY(ESOF),-inc:manual-locking hubs and auto rotary control on $185.00 instrument panel 67E EXTRA EXTRA HEAVY-DUTY ALTERNATOR(240 AMP) $0.00 473 SNOW PLOW PREP PACKAGE, -inc:pre-selected springs(see Order Guide Supplemental $185.00 Reference for springs/FGAWR of specific vehicle configurations), NOTE 1: Restrictions apply; see Supplemental Reference or Body Builders Layout Book for details, NOTE 2:Also allows for the attachment of a winch 51D SPARE TIRE&WHEEL DELETE ($85,00) 18B PLATFORM RUNNING BOARDS $445.00 166 CARPET DELETE, -inc: Replaced w/black flooring ($50.00) 872 REAR VIEW CAMERA&PREP KIT.-inc: cab wiring $415.00 62M ADJUSTABLE PEDALS INC 633A ORDER CODE 633A $0.00 Sell, service, and deliver letter Page 5 of 8 SUBTOTAL $48,780.00 Advert/Adjustments $0.00 Manufacturer Destination Charge $1,495.00 TOTAL PRICE $50,275.00 Est City. N/A MPG Est Highway: N/A MPG Est Highway Cruising Range: N/A mi Any performance-related calculations are offered solely as guidelines. Actual unit performance will depend on your operating conditions. Sell, service, and deliver letter Page 6 of 8 Standard Equipment MECHANICAL Engine: 6.21-2-Valve SOHC EFI NA V8 (Flex-Fuel) Transmission: TorgShift 6-Speed Automatic(6R140)-inc: SelectShift 3.73 Axle Ratio GVWR: 11,400 Ib Payload Package Complete restrictions/requirements not available. 50-State Emissions System Transmission w/Oil Cooler Manual Transfer Case Part-Time Four-Wheel Drive HD 200 Amp Alternator 78-Amp/Hr 750CCA Maintenance-Free Battery w/Run Down Protection Towing w/Hamess, Brake Controller and Trailer Sway Control 4820#Maximum Payload HD Shock Absorbers Front And Rear Anti-Roll Bars Firm Suspension Hydraulic Power-Assist Steering 40 Gal. Fuel Tank Single Stainless Steel Exhaust Manual Locking Hubs Front Suspension w/Coil Springs Leaf Rear Suspension w/Leaf Springs 4-Wheel Disc Brakes w/4-Wheel ABS, Front And Rear Vented Discs, Brake Assist and Hill Hold Control Upfitter Switches EXTERIOR Wheels: 18" Sparkle Silver Painted Cast Aluminum -inc: bright hub covers/center omaments Tires: LT275/65Rxl8E BSW A/S Clearcoat Paint Chrome Front Bumper w/Body-Colored Rub Strip/Fascia Accent and 2 Tow Hooks Black Side Windows Trim and Black Front Windshield Trim Black Door Handles Manual Extendable Trailer Style Mirrors Black Power Heated Side Mirrors w/Convex Spotter, Manual Folding and Tum Signal Indicator Fixed Rear Window I Variable Intermittent Wipers Privacy Glass Aluminum Panels Front License Plate Bracket Black Grille w/Chrome Accents Fully Automatic Aero-Composite Halogen Daytime Running Lights Preference Setting Headlamps w/Delay-Off Cab Clearance Lights Perimeter/Approach Lights Sell, service, and deliver letter Page 7 of 8 ENTERTAINMENT Radio: AM/FM Stereo/MP3 Player-inc: 7-speakers Radio w/Seek-Scan, Clock, Speed Compensated Volume Control and Radio Data System Fixed Antenna SYNC Communications& Entertainment System-inc: enhanced voice recognition w/911 Assist, 4.2" LCD center stack screen, AppLink, 1 smart-charging USB port and steering wheel audio controls SiriusXM Satellite Radio-inc: 1 I/P mounted center speaker and a 6-month prepaid subscription, Service is not available in Alaska and Hawaii, Subscriptions to all SiriusXM services are sold by SiriusXM after trial period, If you decide to continue service after your trial, the subscription plan you choose will automatically renew thereafter and you will be charged according to your chosen payment method at then-current rates, Fees and taxes apply, To cancel you must call SiriusXM at 1-866-635-2349, See SiriusXM Customer Agreement for complete terms at www.siriusxm.com, All fees and programming subject to change, Sirius,XM and all related marks and logos are trademarks of Sirius XM Radio Inc INTERIOR 4-Way Driver Seat-inc: Manual Recline and Fore/Aft Movement 4-Way Passenger Seat-inc: Manual Recline and Fore/Aft Movement 6040 Folding Split-Bench Front Facing Fold-Up Cushion Rear Seat Manual TiltlTelescoping Steering Column Gauges-inc: Speedometer, Odometer, Oil Pressure, Engine Coolant Temp, Tachometer, Transmission Fluid Temp, Engine Hour Meter, Trip Odometer and Trip Computer Power Rear Windows Rear Cupholder Remote Keyless Entry w/Integrated Key Transmitter, Illuminated Entry and Panic Button Cruise Control w/Steering Wheel Controls Manual Air Conditioning HVAC-inc: Underseat Ducts Illuminated Locking Glove Box Full Cloth Headliner Urethane Gear Shift Knob Interior Trim-inc: Metal-Look Instrument Panel Insert and Chrome Interior Accents Cloth 40/20140 Split Bench Seat-inc: 20%center under-seat storage, center armrest, cupholder, storage, 4-way adjustable driver/passenger headrests and driver's side manual lumbar Day-Night Rearview Mirror Driver And Passenger Visor Vanity Mirrors 3 12V DC Power Outlets Full Overhead Console w/Storage and 3 12V DC Power Outlets — Fade-To-Off Interior Lighting Front And Rear Map Lights Full Carpet Floor Covering -inc: Carpet Front And Rear Floor Mats Underhood Lights Instrument Panel Bin, Covered Dashboard Storage, Driver/Passenger And Rear Door Bins and Locking 2nd Row Underseat Storage Power 1st Row Windows w/Driver And Passenger 1-Touch Up/Down Delayed Accessory Power Sell, service, and deliver letter Page 8 of 8 Power Door Locks Systems Monitor Trip Computer Outside Temp Gauge Analog Display Seats w/Cloth Back Material Manual Adjustable Rear Head Restraints 2 Seatback Storage Pockets Perimeter Alarm Securilock Anti-Theft Ignition (pats) Engine Immobilizer Air Filtration SAFETY Electronic Stability Control(ESC)And Roll Stability Control (RSC) ABS And Driveline Traction Control Side Impact Beams Dual Stage Driver And Passenger Seat-Mounted Side Airbags Low Tire Pressure Warning Outboard Front Lap And Shoulder Safety Belts-inc: Height Adjusters Mykey System -inc: Top Speed Limiter, Audio Volume Limiter, Early Low Fuel Warning, Programmable Sound Chimes and Beltminder w/Audio Mute Safety Canopy System Curtain 1st And 2nd Row Airbags Dual Stage Driver And Passenger Front Airbags D 333 2" STREET NE HOPKINS, MN 55343-8337 D 952-938-5451 M 800-229-5451 'Equipment & Suppi FAX 952-938-0159 vtiviv.abmequip.com Custom Truck Equipment for the Utility, Construction,Municipal and Refuse Industries Quotation#021518-095-01 April 9, 2018 Marshall Beugen City of Golden Valley 7800 Golden Valley Road Golden Valley, MN 55427 Dear Marshall, I am pleased to submit the following per your request. == Highland Rescue Body== Workmanship Requirements The installation of hardware parts such as hinges, catches, handles, or knobs shall be accomplished to avoid damaging the hardware or the mounting surface. After fabrication, all parts shall be cleaned of the following: smudges; loose, spattered, or excess welding; metal chips or filings; or any other foreign material which might detract from the intended operation, function, or appearance of the apparatus or its equipment. This would include any particles which could loosen or become dislodged during the normal expected life of the equipment. Whenever possible, this cleaning shall take place before the parts are assembled. Threaded parts or devices shall show no evidence of cross-threading, mutilation, or detrimental burrs. All screw type and rivet fasteners shall be tight to allow no relative movement between the attached parts. All bolts and screws shall not be tightened in excess of the SAE torque standard established for the grade, screw, and thread type. All welds shall be free of harmful defects such as cracks, porosity, undercuts, voids, and gaps. There shall be no weld burn through. Fillets shall be uniform and smooth. There shall be no damage to adjacent parts resulting from the welding. Customer Supplied Chassis Information The apparatus body shall be installed on the customer supplied chassis by ABM Equipment&Supply. ■ Make: Ford ■ Model: F-350 ■ Gab-to-Axle: 60-inches ■ Color: TBD BRINGING YO U THE BEST NAMES IN THE B USINESS An Equal Opportunity Employer Quotation#021518-095-01 -2- April 9, 2018 Body Construction The entire apparatus body is to be an independent structure constructed from bonded and molded fiber reinforced composite panels and compartments. The resin shall be thermoset and shall not be subject to distortion or loss of structural integrity at temperatures up to 450° Fahrenheit. This shall provide a strong, lightweight, corrosion free structure that will withstand extremely high temperatures. All fiberglass used in the construction of the unit shall be grade"E" or"S," and the resin to glass ratio shall be a 30170 ratio average or higher. The glass reinforced polyester shall be not less than 3/16 inches thick at any point on the body. Additionally, all coring materials shall have a minimum covering of 118-inch thick glass and resin on either side. All coring for bulkheads, partitions, floors, cabinets, and doors shall be PVC-based, rigid, closed cell structural foam. The apparatus manufacturer shall determine the proper thickness and foam density for each particular application. The top of the apparatus shall have a nonskid surface across the entire area. Additionally, it shall support, without distortion, a walking person weighing up to 300 lbs. The entire body shall be removable in its entirety without the disassembly of any compartments, flooring, or other structural components. Body Frame Construction The body and cabinets shall be supported with a frame of channel or tubular aluminum members. The frame shall extend under the wheel well areas at the front and rear and shall be attached to the compartments. The cross members in the support system shall be spaced so that there is no more than 1/4-inch of vertical deflection per 256 square inches when 250 lbs, is evenly distributed over 40 square inches. All tubular aluminum shall have a minimum wall thickness of 3/16-inch, and any channel shall be a minimum of 1/4-inch thick. The frame shall be constructed to become an integral portion of the service body. The channel or tubular aluminum deck and cabinet support frames shall be strong enough to support 5000 lbs. in the bed area and 1000 lbs. of equipment in each side cabinet(the actual load capability of the completed apparatus may be limited by the GVWR). Body Mounting System A spring-loaded body mounting system shall be used to mount the body to the chassis. This system shall be designed to allow independent movement between the body frame and the chassis frame protecting the module from the stresses and twisting rendered by the flexing of the chassis frame. As such,the body frame shall not rest on the chassis frame at any point. The mounts shall be pre-engineered for their intended use. All of the mounting hardware (nuts, bolts, washers) required for complete body installation shall be Grade 8 for sizes%-inch and smaller, and Grade 5 for sizes larger than Mrinch.All nuts shall be self-locking style. All mounting brackets shall be powder coated black. The body front shall be mounted utilizing springer type mounts. The center mount shall consist of an 18-inch-long Delrin spacer mounted mid-length allowing the body frame to rest in a neutral position under full load. The rear body mounts shall be affixed via solid mounts to the chassis frame. Quotation#021518-095-01 -3- April 9, 2018 Vertical Surface(s) The entire front vertical surface of the body shall be covered with a minimum 1/8-inch-thick polished aluminum tread plate for appearance, wear, and enhanced visibility at night. The tread plate shall be designed so that joints are minimized and shall cover the entire vertical surface area. The tread plate shall also incorporate protection of the outboard comers and serve as corner scuff guards. The entire rear vertical surface of the body shall be covered with a minimum 118-inch-thick smooth aluminum for the application of chevron reflective striping. The smooth aluminum shall be designed so that joints are minimized and shall cover the entire vertical surface area. The smooth aluminum shall also incorporate protection of the outboard corners and serve as corner scuff guards. Wheel Well Area The wheel well panels shall be constructed as independent components of the apparatus body. They shall be attached with screws or bolts to allow easy replacement if necessary. Sufficient clearance shall be provided for the use of tire chains. The inside of each wheel well shall be lined with three (3) separate pieces of a minimum 16-gauge stainless steel sheet material to protect the underside of the entire body wheel well area against damage from rocks or broken snow chain links. Each of these sheets shall be attached with stainless steel screws or bolted with self-locking nuts. The use of rivets shall not be acceptable. High Angle of Departure on Back of Body The back of the body shall be angled upward so that the total angle of departure is no less than 23 degrees. This angle shall be fully molded into the side packs of the body and shall have a lip on the inside to provide rigidity. The angle shall be trimmed with aluminum tread plate. AMDOR Roll-Up Door Construction Compartment door construction shall be of the roll-up style and shall be manufactured by Amdor. Each Amdor roll-up shall be constructed of aluminum box section slats with a modular height of one (1) inch and a wall thickness of 0.045 inches. The smooth interior door surface shall prevent the interference with compartment contents. The exterior of the doors shall remain a flat anodized aluminum finish to present an attractive finish. Rollup doors with larger slats shall not be acceptable. Individual slats shall be connected by an integral continuous hinge. This superior hinge arrangement, running the full width of the door at one-inch intervals, shall ensure exceptional strength with a high degree of flexibility. The endshoe on the roll-up door shall be independent of all other endshoes and be positively secured by a snap-in device. This combination shall allow for quick removal and reinstallation when required for service. All door hardware shall be type 6 nylon, a self-lubricating material to reduce friction. Type 6 nylon performance has been proven in temperatures ranging from -50 to 300 degrees Fahrenheit. The door shall be complete with a top gutter section and a one-piece track and side frame section with a finishing flange to extend beyond the edge of the compartment opening. Quotation#021518-095-01 -4- April 9, 2018 The bottom rail shall have a stainless-steel locking bar assembly to allow quick and reliable access to the compartment contents. The locking bar system can be activated from any point along the door width. The door shall utilize a small slat and a balancer plate designed to save space. Each door slat shall have its own recessed bulb seal engineered and tested to ensure zero infiltration under the most severe conditions. The configuration of the seal shall prevent rattle between slats and ensure a perfectly smooth exterior door surface. The seals shall have been specifically tested to ensure superior performance in temperatures ranging from -50 to 190 degrees Fahrenheit. A switch shall be incorporated in the door to activate the "Do Not Move Apparatus" light in the cab when the door is "OPEN". Compartment Lighting The AMDOR roll-up doors described elsewhere in this specification shall incorporate Integral LED compartment lighting that is specifically designed to snap into the side frame of the roll up door. Each custom length shall be encased in a high- impact polycarbonate enclosure with an IP67 waterproof rating. The LEDs shall be clear white. Front Transverse One(1)transverse shall be provided between the forward side compartments of maximum width and height feasible while maintaining the structural integrity of the apparatus body. The transverse shall be a composite"tunnel"that is fiberglassed into the backside of the two(2)front compartments. Driver Side Compartment(s) The driver's side module of the apparatus body shall have approximate overall dimensions as specified. It shall consist of three (3)compartments, each with specified approximate clear depth behind the door when the door is shut. One (1) forward compartment shall be provided in front of the rear wheels. The compartment shall have approximate dimensions of 32.00-inches wide by 56.50-inches tall with approximate clear door opening dimensions of 32.00-inches wide by 49.50-inches tall, not including the "stop" area of the roll up door. The clear depth of the compartment shall be approximately 15-inches behind the door when the door is shut. The compartment shall have a "flow through"vent provided to supply air flow and minimize moisture. The floor of the compartment shall be flush with the door opening to present a "sweep-out"design. One (1)center compartment shall be provided over the rear wheel(s). The compartment shall have approximate dimensions of 42.00-inches wide by 37.25-inches tall with approximate clear door opening dimensions of 42.00-inches wide by 30.25- inches tall, not including the "stop" area of the roll up door. The clear depth of the compartment shall be approximately 15.00-inches behind the door when the door is shut. The compartment shall have a "flow through" vent provided to supply air flow and minimize moisture. The floor of the compartment shall be flush with the door opening to present a "sweep-out" design. The compartment shall have a "flow through" vent provided to supply air flow and minimize moisture. The floor of the compartment shall be flush with the door opening to present a"sweep-out"design. Quotation#021518-095-01 -5- April 9, 2018 One (1) rear compartment shall be provided aft of the rear wheels.The compartment shall have approximate dimensions of 32.00-inches wide by 56.50-inches tall with approximate clear door opening dimensions of 32.00-inches wide by 49.50- inches tall, not including the"stop"area of the roll up door. The clear depth of the compartment shall be approximately 15.00-inches behind the door when the door is shut. The compartment shall have a"flow through"vent provided to supply air flow and minimize moisture. The floor of the compartment shall be flush with the door opening to present a"sweep-out" design. The clear depth of the compartment shall be approximately 19 inches behind the door when the door is shut. The compartment shall have a"flow through"vent provided to supply air flow and minimize moisture.The floor of the compartment shall be flush with the door opening to present a"sweep-out"design. Passenger Side Compartment(s) The passenger's side module of the apparatus body shall have approximate overall dimensions as specified. It shall consist of three (3)compartments, each with specified approximate clear depth behind the door when the door is shut. One (1) forward compartment shall be provided in front of the rear wheels. The compartment shall have approximate dimensions of 32.00-inches wide by 56.50-inches tall with approximate clear door opening dimensions of 32.00-inches wide by 49.50-inches tall, not including the "stop" area of the roll up door. The clear depth of the compartment shall be approximately 15-inches behind the door when the door is shut. The compartment shall have a "flow through"vent provided to supply air flow and minimize moisture. The floor of the compartment shall be flush with the door opening to present a "sweep-out"design. One (1)center compartment shall be provided over the rear wheel(s). The compartment shall have approximate dimensions of 42.00-inches wide by 37.25-inches tall with approximate clear door opening dimensions of 42.00-inches wide by 30.25- inches tall, not including the "stop" area of the roll up door. The clear depth of the compartment shall be approximately 15.00-inches behind the door when the door is shut. The compartment shall have a "flow through" vent provided to supply air flow and minimize moisture. The floor of the compartment shall be flush with the door opening to present a "sweep-out" design. The compartment shall have a "flow through" vent provided to supply air flow and minimize moisture. The floor of the compartment shall be flush with the door opening to present a"sweep-out"design. One (1)rear compartment shall be provided aft of the rear wheels. The compartment shall have approximate dimensions of 32.00-inches wide by 56.50-inches tall with approximate clear door opening dimensions of 32.00-inches wide by 49.50- inches tall, not including the"stop"area of the roll up door. The clear depth of the compartment shall be approximately 15.00-inches behind the door when the door is shut. The compartment shall have a"flow through" vent provided to supply air flow and minimize moisture. The floor of the compartment shall be flush with the door opening to present a "sweep-out" design. The clear depth of the compartment shall be approximately 19 inches behind the door when the door is shut. The compartment shall have a"flow through"vent provided to supply air flow and minimize moisture. The floor of the compartment shall be flush with the door opening to present a"sweep-out"design. Quotation#021518-095-01 -6- April 9, 2018 Load Bed Area Load Bed Floor The rear load bed area in the center of the body shall have approximate dimensions of 114.00-inches long (unless a front transverse is specified) by 48.00-inches wide by 43.00-inches tall (from the bed floor to the top of the compartments). The floor of the bed shall be formed from the aluminum body frame covered in a single sheet of smooth aluminum. A minimum of four(4) drain holes shall be provided in the corners of the load bed floor to prevent trapping water. Load Bed Walls The load bed area shall be equipped with a 118-inch smooth aluminum, permanently attached to the load bed walls. Tailgate An aluminum tread plate tailgate shall be installed at the rear of the load bed area. The tailgate shall be between 18.00- inches to 20.00-inches in height and have single latching mechanism. The tailgate shall be securely fastened on each side. Two (2) rubber bumpers shall be positioned in a manner to prevent any part of the tailgate from directly contracting the rear panel of the apparatus body. Durable Coating The load bed floor, load bed walls, and backside, forward facing surface, of the tailgate shall be lined with a commercially available black bed liner. The surfaces shall be prepped properly prior to the application of the bed liner to ensure of proper adhesiveness. Scene/Work Lighting Four(4)4.00-inch diameter round LED scene/work lights shall be recessed into the load bed walls, inboard facing, to illuminate the load bed area. Two (2) lights shall be installed on each load bed, one (1)towards the front and one (1) towards the rear and shall be mounted in stainless steel bezels. The lights shall be controlled from a switch located in the chassis cab. Compartment Interior(s) Each of the side compartment interiors shall be finished with Zolatone paint. This paint shall have a multicolor finish with high resistance to scratching and wear. This shall present a neat,finished appearance to the interior of the compartments. Compartment Floor Matting The side compartments shall each have black Dri-Dek plastic flooring on the floor of the compartment. The tiles shall be opened faced to allow drainage and ventilation while preventing moisture buildup against equipment stored in the compartment. The leading edges of the compartment openings shall have a ramp. Quotation#021518-095-01 -7- April 9, 2018 Apparatus Body Trim The front and rear of the unit and all leading outside edges of the apparatus body shall be protected with a minimum of 1/8- inch (3 mm)thick polished aluminum tread plate. The aluminum shall wrap around the corners a minimum of 1-25-inches. Composite Shelving Struts/Tracks Vertically-mounted composite shelving tracks shall be provided and installed in all enclosed body compartments, except passenger's side lower rear compartment, for the current or future installation of infinitely-adjustable shelving, slide out trays or equipment brackets. The composite tracks shall allow for the shelves to be adjustable every two inches vertically utilizing nylon reinforced composite shelving standards with embedded stainless lock nuts. Compartment Shelving Six(6) adjustable shelves shall be provided and installed in the completed body compartments. The shelves shall be 12.00- inches in depth and be constructed from protruded fiberglass and be capable of supporting 250 pounds of live load without being damaged or permanently distorted. The shelf location(s) shall be as follows: Driver Side Front Passenger Side Front — See Transverse Line Item — See Transverse Line Item Driver Side Center Passenger Side Center — One (1) protruded fiberglass shelf — One (1) protruded fiberglass shelf Driver Side Rear Passenger Side Rear — Two(2) protruded fiberglass shelves — Two (2) protruded fiberglass shelves Grab Handles Two(2)24.00-inch long NFPA compliant grab handles shall be installed on the inboard edges of the load bed area, one(1) per side. Each handle shall be positioned just above the tailgate allowing a person to access the handle from the ground. One (1)warning plate shall be affixed to the rear of the apparatus body in a conspicuous location. The warning plate shall read "WARNING: ISO N01 RIDE ON REAR STEPV:HiLE'VEHICLE IS IN IMM fCAH DEATH OF SERIOUS i€JURY MAY f'iFSU LT" ICC and Work Lighting One license plate mounting bracket shall be provided at the rear of the apparatus on the driver's side. One (1) clear LED light shall be provided to illuminate the license plate. Three (3) round ICC clearance lights shall be located at the rear of the apparatus above the bumper.Additional lighting shall be provided to conform to DOT, Federal, and NHTSA specifications for vehicles of 80.00-inches(2032 mm)wide. All lighting shall be compatible with the 12-volt chassis electrical system. The clearance lights shall be LED lights. The clearance lights shall be located according to ICC regulations. Quotation#021518-095-01 -8- April 9, 2018 Tail Light Assembly One (1)four taillight assembly shall be mounted on each side of the rear panel (two assemblies total). Each assembly shall consist of a Whelen 700 series red LED stop/tail light, a Whelen 700 series amber LED arrow turn signal light, a Whelen 700 series emergency flasher described elsewhere in this specification, and a Whelen 700 series LED back up light. Each light shall be approximately 7.00-inches wide by 3.00-inches tall. All four (4) lights shall be mounted together in a Cast Products polished aluminum four light surface mount vertical bezel. Taillight Assembly Layout: Emergency LED Flasher Red LED Stop/Tail Light Amber LED Arrow Turn Signal Back Up Light LED Ground Lighting Two (2) 4.00-inch diameter round LED step lights shall be mounted in stainless steel bezels to the underside of the rear bumper. The lights shall face downward and shall be mounted so that the beam shines towards the ground. The lights shall be recessed into the bumper to protect them from brush. Body Finish Apparatus Body Finish The exterior finish of the apparatus body shall be painted to match the chassis cab. All aluminum and stainless steel shall remain unpainted.Any raw steel used in the fabrication of the mounting system shall be prepared for powder coating following the any/all recommendations for the preparation of the surface. Powder coat for all steel parts shall be matte black. Striping and Lettering Rear At least four inches, not to exceed eight inches, of chevron striping, red and fluorescent yellow, shall be provided on the vertical rear facing surface of the apparatus body; the edge of the bumper shall be included. The pattern shall slope downward and away from the centerline of the vehicle at an angle of 45 degrees. If a single 4-inch-wide vertical surface is unavailable, multiple strips may be used. Rear Bumper Construction The rear bumper shall be constructed from 3/16-inch aluminum tread plate shall be as wide as the overall apparatus body width. The bumper shall protect the apparatus body. Additionally, the rear bumper shall support, without distortion, a walking person weighing up to 300 pounds. The bumper shall be shipped loose with the apparatus body. Tow Package Class V receiver hitch (or equal)with 2"or 2 W(specify) receiver tube, tow hooks and trailer socket(specify). Quotation#021518-095-01 -9- April 9, 2018 PRICE AS DESCRIBED, FOB HOPKINS, MN 47168.00 Above prices do not include any applicable taxes. Thank you for considering ABM Equipment&Supply. I hope with the enclosed that you will be able to place this business with us. Should you have any questions or need any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact Rick Loosbrock or myself. Sincerely, Ron Zimmer President BFX Fire Apparatus City of Golden Valley City of Golden Valley Marshall Beugen Marshall Beugen 7800 Golden Valley Road 7800 Golden Valley Road Golden Valley, MN 55427 Golden Valley, MN 55427 mbeugen@goldenvalleymn.gov mbeugen@goldenvalleymn.gov Quote No: 10953-0001 03/14/2018 Pae 1 PART NO DESCRIPTION == ig an escue o y=_ 02-24-0200 Workmanship Requirements 00-19-1004 Customer Supplied Chassis Information 02-18-0200 Body Construction 06-00-9000 Body Frame Construction 06-02-9000 Body Mounting System 17-60-0200 Vertical Surface(s) 04-02-9100 Wheel Well Area 10-90-1000 High Angle of Departure on Back of Body 11-21-9000 Front Transverse 11-21-0200 Load Bed Area 11-30-0100 Compartment Interior(s) 11-30-3100 Compartment Floor Matting 17-60-0250 Apparatus Body Trim 17-60-1100 Grab Handles 25-06-9000 ICC and Work Lighting 26-04-1300 Tail Light Assembly 26-00-1000 LED Ground Lighting 30-02-0100 Body Finish 37-20-6000 Rear Bumper Construction 37-20-6500 Trailer Hitch 60-00-0100 Delivery Location Total 49,475.00 Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting June 19, 2018 Agenda Item 3. E. 2. Authorize Watermain Gate Valve Repairs Prepared By Tim Kieffer, Public Works Maintenance Manager Joe Hansen, Utility Maintenance Supervisor Summary Repair of watermain gate valves is required to maintain the City’s water distribution system. The 2018 Water and Sanitary Sewer Capital Improvement Program includes $150,000 for mill and overlay water repairs (W&SS-051). Staff received the following quotes for 23 watermain gate valve repairs located in the 2018 in-house asphalt mill and overlay project: Contractor # Valve Repairs Total Cost Dave Perkins Contracting, Inc. 23 $88,310 Valley-Rich Co., Inc. 23 $168,750 New Look Contracting, Inc. 23 $184,450 Staff decided to include 8 additional gate valves in conjunction with the CenterPoint Beltline project on Golden Valley Road east of Rhode Island Avenue while the road is closed and the contractor mobilized. Staff received the following quotes: Contractor # Valve Repairs Total Cost Dave Perkins Contracting, Inc. 8 $31,200 Valley-Rich Co., Inc. 8 $54,400 New Look Contracting, Inc. 8 $46,000 Recommended Action Motion to approve quote from Dave Perkins Contracting for the repair of 23 watermain gate valves for a total cost of $88,310. Motion to approve quote from Dave Perkins Contracting, Inc. for the repair of 8 watermain gate valves for a total cost of $31,200. Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting June 19, 2018 Agenda Item 3. F. Acceptance of Donation from Golden Valley Federated Women’s Club Prepared By Brian Erickson, Recreation Supervisor Rick Birno, Director of Parks & Recreation Summary As adopted in the Donation/Gift Policy, a gift of real or personal property must be accepted by the City Council by resolution and be approved by a two-thirds majority of the Council. All donations and grants must be acknowledged and accepted by motion with a simple majority. Attachments • Resolution Accepting a Donation from Golden Valley Federated Women’s Club for the Summer Concert Series (1 page) Recommended Action Motion to adopt Resolution accepting a Donation from the Golden Valley Federated Women’s Club for the Summer Concert Series. Resolution 18-41 June 19, 2018 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION ACCEPTING DONATION FROM GOLDEN VALLEY FEDERATED WOMEN’S CLUB FOR THE SUMMER CONCERT SERIES WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution 04-20 on March 16, 2004, which established a policy for the receipt of gifts; and WHEREAS, the Resolution states that a gift of real or personal property must be accepted by the City Council by resolution and be approved by a two-thirds majority of the Council. All donations and grants must be acknowledged and accepted by motion with a simple majority. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council accepts the following donation: $100 from Golden Valley Federated Women’s Club for support of the summer concert series. _____________________________ Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: _____________________________ Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by the City Clerk. Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting June 19, 2018 Agenda Item 3. G. Authorize Contract with Corrective Asphalt Materials, Inc. for 2018 Pavement Preservation Project Prepared By R.J. Kakach PE, Assistant City Engineer Tim Kieffer, Public Works Maintenance Manager Summary Historically, the City utilized chip sealcoating as its primary method of extending the life of bituminous roadways. In the early 2000’s, this pavement preservation procedure began to display signs of prematurely deteriorating road surfaces. The degradation of the wear course (top pavement layer) included stripping of the pavement surface and shallow potholes formed. In many cases, this stripping continued until most of the wear course disappeared. The City discontinued chip sealcoating in 2012 until a solution to the pavement degradation problem was determined. Over the past few years, the City has experimented with different methods of preserving new pavements to find a cost effective solution. One asphalt emulsion treatment (Reclamite) penetrates the pavement surface and slows oxidation, keeping the pavement flexible. This pavement preservation treatment protects new pavements for approximately five years, which is consistent with the period that chip sealcoating preserved pavements provided. The City installed this product in 2016 and in 2017 with success and will continue to use Reclamite on future pavement preservation projects. Reclamite is a proprietary product produced by Tricor Refining, LLC in Bakersfield, California. Tricor has provided a letter identifying Corrective Asphalt Materials (CAM), South Roxana, Illinois as the sole supplier/applicator for its products in the State of Minnesota (attached). Corrective Asphalt Materials will place 52,770 square yards of Reclamite this year on streets that were part of the Pavement Management Projects from 2015 to 2017 (see attached location map). The cost of the product is approximately one-third to one-half the cost of chip sealcoating, making it cost effective, as well as valuable in preserving pavements. The May 10, 2018, proposal from CAM outlines a cost of $43,271.40 for placement of the Reclamite. The 2018 Street Maintenance Operating Budget (1440-6440) includes funding for this project. The fund balance currently is $148,500 before the proposed purchase. Attachments • Pavement Preservation Location Map (1 page) • Corrective Asphalt Materials Proposal (1 page) • Letter from Tricor Refining, LLC dated February 22, 2018 (1 sheet) Recommended Action Motion to approve and authorize the contract with Corrective Asphalt Materials, LLC in the amount of $43,271.40. 0) ( • � o 'o 'o I IM r—; _ p > m `m o s ,� ea O O O e � g � d r r r— � •'nos` O O Chi v O N o g v ? $ N G silo 3NNIW 30 xilJ F Y. r ♦ uaq•MAIN b A+•w �0 v ` 'e.0ls • I ----------- •M >w��.. �.,o� w.�.nnb a z '�. A.In .� �t� « «,. i b M'eA• J �• x " Nov.w ; Y wai+w.w & 4 •tea ,,, s�%. .d•ne a � �w°N°e o vvlN � � `� A b a^°•� o 3 Id N `' • wY �f ` 'r..l N•nY N7 \0��, > � 'ppO,NMM W«NN00 4 i O 1 0•MNV N r MI yun d0 C Sa c S F Mu°WAy" i pN«tl•WON $ A p � N« a: — «Y MI• Sent nvl°N f o M t•• p W�N •, n0' �� N•nY•a•LO � '-1 _ KI ol"u 6 N•^Y°0 1 � •JC «tlW fl YY!!� N«V u0 >•Pl N«Y lull �.\ D•N! I ,k•RO^ fr m A•wy01N s, y, � �ps" �. N q>• N q>•ll y S N•o•••••j uny O «VOpyyM 0••n I{ F I Ne \Aw U 4 •! .o I -�. PwH N«tl w.t 333 N«•no••oae- vaw �y_. � � r j i N• MY b \ � �^Q' pt Y Uq v+ fdf & N •oras '' S v I�I 1 • N« aNNI S3 E Combnoe W C ) ,A •nY Pncurug N.n I V� � OOn010� 5 s•nY w°r.a NO3 p10, N«Y NOoa• �A RNNN! "b , hep vVAi g•nY e040/r LS¢ , N°nY"PI N«Y Nm i � uipew°H r ..� rs N '�5W7 $ 3 N«tl Aw•al S«V 3 e aS .. , 15 , •nY Ya9u• y •NV c S N•AV•u•NN•7 �� Z Nmv NNmwl S•AY `4 S«Y N•nv0 •WU e 6«V W.v v II R D nie AveN oow N�0b a N«V••a Mu•d i � 1 �I yy «Y•N•NAwwd i $ N•°V 0•t•NO _ ; M e It N•^V Nuw4•DOVN � N•" -¢I a l l.� ; n0 _ N«Yawn� �l l � YOu.Nlpggl I Nsl v.oa INWN•n„•A •>a• Y ••ANIw � s«Y atl,,,r• •aR•n I d •„ S � • A A r � t v •�B'" y, w.�.y., 2yE' gNN10 ;uO MVO < O p•0•a •Nd -v. pyre•f E ID Otl AgypH «v N,a,mRM N Y uNY•aMM � �� °re's ,,,,�� •ny aA n n N w.n •duWnYOog �.I•'^S Z 0�N � � � q Neel ; •"`mac--.s..��.' y CN•Y•11"V N V I� \ H•tlN ,6S ~In NUY.uonB N«V wo N•nV •0•S40 \ 7 r ` MOxO w r \ U 4 � 1(N•ntl u.03 fP l+ � d .� N«Y {� N•nY ° ..-_ IN z P �n` "•lp N•nY n •p ; S 4 5��` '� � .�'�•� I (tea n � D N nY•OyW WI �� v ' MV uy0••• • N•ntl u4ocrye i6 � \•, W �� •aWIH tp .� _.._. ..691 A•nwINIH AC �..._ . 7d 30 A.LIJ N1n ON d II a Vd.s Il107'1S. I IJ I d0 A110 Mailingaddress: \ PO BOX 87129 orrective 300 Daniel Boone Trail sphalt South Roxana,IL 62087 aterials Locations: 300 Daniel Boone Trail,South Roxana,IL 62087 43W630 Wheeler Road,Sugar Grove,IL 60554 City of Golden Valley, MN May 10,2018 Attention: Marshall Beugen W:763.593.8085 Email:mbeugen@goldenvalleymn.gov Please accept the following as our formal proposal to apply Reclamite Maltene Based Rejuvenating Agent to the street list below. 2015 23,765 Square Yards 2016 18,325 Square Yards 2017 10.680 Square Yards Total Square Yards 52,770 Square Yards • Apply reclamite to approximately 52,770 SY of Asphalt Road Ways oTotal: @$0.82/SY............................................................................................................................$43,271.40 CAM's Responsibilities: • Supply and Apply Reclamite • Supply and Apply Lime screenings • Traffic Control and Signage • Sweep Limestone screenings 24 hours after application City of Golden Responsibilities: • City to distribute resident notifications if deemed necessary. • City to have location for 25 tons of screenings to be delivered and to keep excess and swept screenings. • Dandy Curb Sacks if deemed necessary. Price good for 30 days. Payment Net 30 Billing Information(please fill out upon acceptance) Name : Address: Phone Number: Again, thank you for the opportunity. We look forward to providing our professional services. Sincerely, Colleen Holtmeyer Business Development Corrective Asphalt Materials, LLC 314.267.9313 halt Solutions and Industrial Dust Control Contact Us: (800)374-5560 • (618)254-3855 (618)254-2200 FAX ways • Airports • Utilities • Parking Areas www.cammidwest.com n � ) I ' t TRICORREFINING, LLC Producers of GOLDEN BEAR PRESERVATION PRODUCTS 1134 Manor St. • Bakersfield, CA 93308 / P.O. Box 5877 • Bakersfield, CA 93388 Phone 661.393.7110 - www.tricorrefining.com February 22, 2018 Marshall Bergen Streets and Vehicle Maintenance Supervisor City of Golden Valley 7800 Golden Valley Road Golden Valley, MN 55427 E: mbeugen@goldenvalleymn.gov RE: Sole Source Applicator for Reclamite(D and CRFS Restorative Seal 2018 Corrective Asphalt Materials, LLC P.O. BOX 87129 South Roxana, IL 62087 This letter confirms that TRICOR Refining, LLC has appointed Corrective Asphalt Materials, South Roxana, Illinois to market and apply Reclamite Preservative Seal and CRF Restorative Seal as the sole source supplier/applicator in the State of Minnesota. Corrective Asphalt Materials has the necessary equipment and product familiarity to provide a successful application as well as having a very successful track record in the state with applying the applications. TRICOR Refining, LLC - Reclamite Preservative Seal is the only maltene based asphalt rejuvenator marketed nationally with a 50 plus year history of product use. Reclamite has been proven in various testing by state, county and government agencies to decrease viscosity and increase penetration value of the asphalt. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Yours truly, Jim Brownridge Jim Brownridge Marketing Manager - Cell: 661.337.9979 E: jimbCtricorrefining.com Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting June 19, 2018 Agenda Item 3. H. Receipt of May 2018 Financial Reports Prepared By Sue Virnig, Finance Director Summary The monthly financial report provides a progress report of the following funds: ∼ General Fund Operations ∼ Conservation/Recycling Fund (Enterprise Fund) ∼ Water and Sewer Utility Fund (Enterprise Fund) ∼ Brookview Golf Course (Enterprise Fund) ∼ Motor Vehicle Licensing (Enterprise Fund) ∼ Storm Utility Fund (Enterprise Fund) ∼ Equipment Replacement Fund (Capital Projects Fund) ∼ Brookview Center (Special Revenue Fund) ∼ Human Services Fund (Special Revenue Fund) ∼ Building Improvement Fund (Capital Projects Fund) ∼ Park Improvement Fund (Capital Projects Fund) General Fund Operations: As of May 2018, the City has used $5,880,358 of fund balance to balance the General Fund Budget. Attachments • May 2018 General Fund (2 pages) • May 2018 Conservation/Recycling Fund (1 page) • May 2018 Water and Sewer Utility Fund (1 page) • May 2018 Brookview Golf Course (1 page) • May 2018 Motor Vehicle Licensing (1 page) • May 2018 Storm Utility Fund (1 page) • May 2018 Equipment Replacement Fund (1 page) • May 2018 Brookview Center Fund (1 page) • May 2018 Human Services Fund (1 page) • May 2018 Building Improvement Fund (1 page) • May 2018 Park Improvement Fund (1 page) Recommended Action Motion to receive and file the May 2018 Financial Reports. Over % 2018 May YTD (Under)Of Budget Budget Actual Actual Budget Expend. 001 Council $350,935 22,798 129,063 ($221,872)36.78% 003 City Manager 813,410 63,147 315,003 (498,407)38.73% 004 Transfers Out 1,982,580 0 882,580 (1,100,000)44.52%(1) 005 Admin. Services 1,986,970 121,831 719,527 (1,267,443)36.21% 006 Legal 158,100 23,630 85,909 (72,191)54.34%(2) 007 Risk Management 310,000 0 1,000 (309,000)0.32% 011 General Gov't. Bldgs.732,680 39,987 271,393 (461,287)37.04% 016 Planning 409,655 22,846 126,308 (283,347)30.83% 018 Inspections 811,280 55,612 289,264 (522,016)35.66% 022 Police 6,204,575 444,291 2,224,090 (3,980,485)35.85% 023 Fire 1,496,150 93,014 552,707 (943,443)36.94% 035 Physical Dev Admin 309,505 25,196 123,626 (185,879)39.94% 036 Engineering 776,095 60,663 270,230 (505,865)34.82% 037 Streets 1,790,925 87,824 653,616 (1,137,309)36.50% 066 Park & Rec. Admin.737,210 52,731 274,725 (462,485)37.27% 067 Park Maintenance 1,215,945 103,386 427,511 (788,434)35.16% 068 Recreation Programs 445,385 22,838 121,849 (323,536)27.36% TOTAL Expenditures $20,531,400 $1,239,794 $7,468,401 ($13,062,999)36.38% (1) Tranfers will be made in June, 2018 except for Equipment Transfer of $882,580. (2) Legal services are billed thru April. City of Golden Valley Monthly Budget Report - General Fund Expenditures Mayl, 2018 (unaudited) Division 42.00% Over % 2018 May YTD (Under)of Budget Type Budget Actual Actual Budget Received Ad Valorem Taxes $17,253,460 8,759 8,759 ($17,244,701)0.05%(1) Licenses 220,980 83,205 167,710 ($53,270)75.89% Permits 929,785 159,145 602,820 ($326,965)64.83% State Aid 52,375 2,400 2,400 ($49,975)4.58%(2) County Aid 0 1,116 Charges For Services: General Government 25,250 1,901 7,132 ($18,118)28.25% Public Safety 160,900 15,419 97,860 ($63,040)60.82% Public Works 163,600 17,194 64,557 ($99,043)39.46% Park & Rec 415,550 34,914 128,167 ($287,383)30.84% Other Funds 691,500 57,126 283,295 ($408,205)40.97% Fines & Forfeitures 320,000 30,761 126,958 ($193,042)39.67%(3) Interest On Investments 75,000 0 0 ($75,000)0.00%(4) Miscellaneous Revenue 193,000 19,956 84,769 ($108,231)43.92% Transfers In 30,000 2,500 12,500 ($17,500)41.67%(5) TOTAL Revenue $20,531,400 $433,280 $1,588,043 ($18,944,473)7.73% Notes: (1) Payments are received in July, December, and January (delinquencies). (2) Police Training will be paid in August. Safe and Sober is billed on time spent. LGA is paid in July, Dec ($37,185 total). (3) Fines/Forfeitures are thru for April 2018. (4) Investment income is allocated at year end. (5)Transfers are monthly. Percentage Of Year Completed City of Golden Valley Monthly Budget Report - General Fund Revenues May 2018 (unaudited) Over 2018 May YTD (Under)% Budget Actual Actual Budget Current Revenue Hennepin County Recycling Grant 42,875 0 0 (42,875)0.00%(4) Recycling Charges 382,520 33,600 131,674 (250,846)34.42%(2) Miscellaneous Revenues 8,000 0 0 (8,000) Interest on Investments 4,000 0 0 (4,000)0.00%(1) Total Revenue 437,395 33,600 131,674 (305,721)30.10% Expenses: Recycling 461,605 96,864 173,780 (287,825)37.65%(3) Total Expenses 461,605 96,864 173,780 (287,825)37.65% (1) Interest Earnings are allocated at year-end. (2) Includes utility billings thru May 2018. (3) This includes the recycling services thru April 2018. (4) Grant reduced due to no compost program. Further information about projects and financing are located in the 2018-2022 CIP and 2018-2019 Budget. City of Golden Valley Monthly Budget Report - Conservation/Recycling Enterprise Fund May 2018 (unaudited) Over 2018 May YTD (Under)% Budget Actual Actual Budget Current Revenue Water Charges 4,571,280 341,832 1,409,517 (3,161,763)30.83%(1) Emergency Water Supply 183,080 14,698 84,134 (98,946)45.95% Sewer Charges 3,512,300 375,825 1,542,309 (1,969,991)43.91% Meter Sales 20,000 3,784 15,470 (4,530)77.35% Penalties 130,000 30,202 79,001 (50,999)60.77% Charges for Other Services 100,000 6,177 20,803 (79,197)20.80% State Water Testing Fee Pass Through 46,000 4,012 15,754 (30,246)34.25% Sale of Assets 10,000 0 3,459 (6,541)34.59% Franchise Fees 1,000,000 0 0 (1,000,000)0.00% Certificate of Compliance 75,000 11,450 35,800 (39,200)47.73% Interest Earnings 25,000 0 0 (25,000)0.00% Total Revenue 9,672,660 787,980 3,206,247 (6,466,413)33.15% Expenses: Utility Administration 2,930,400 127,220 671,725 (2,258,675)22.92% Sewer Maintenance 3,088,750 237,389 1,379,075 (1,709,675)44.65% Water Maintenance 4,712,065 68,102 1,317,760 (3,394,305)27.97% Total Expenses 10,731,215 432,711 3,368,560 (7,362,655)31.39% City of Golden Valley Monthly Budget Report - Water and Sewer Utility Enterprise Fund May 2018 (unaudited) Over 2018 May YTD (Under)% Budget Actual Actual Budget Current Revenue Green Fees 920,950 150,703 160,055 (760,895)17.38% Driving Range Fees 180,000 38,321 44,664 (135,336)24.81% Par 3 Fees 170,000 19,836 21,336 (148,664)12.55% Lawn Bowling 30,000 0 0 (30,000)0.00% Pro Shop Sales 90,000 18,928 23,513 (66,487)26.13% Pro Shop Rentals 300,000 46,436 51,390 (248,610)17.13% Concession Sales 889,960 136,416 357,089 (532,871)40.12% Other Revenue 182,500 14,763 161,790 (20,710)88.65%(3) Interest Earnings 5,000 0 0 (5,000)0.00%(1) Less: Credit Card Charges/Sales Tax (30,000)0 (4,425)25,575 14.75% Total Revenue 2,738,410 425,403 815,412 (1,922,998)29.78% Expenses: Golf Operations 802,410 63,832 256,050 (546,360)31.91%(2) Course Maintenance 1,219,520 81,396 661,758 (557,762)54.26% Pro Shop 124,400 15,262 70,827 (53,573)56.93% Grill 647,710 135,682 453,102 (194,608)69.95% Driving Range 74,300 9,747 11,824 (62,476)15.91% Par 3 Course 26,640 4,971 6,100 (20,540)22.90% Lawn Bowling 8,380 0 1,344 (7,036)16.04% Banquet Staffing 25,400 4,010 10,432 (14,968)41.07% Total Expenses 2,928,760 314,900 1,471,437 (1,457,323)50.24% (1) Interest Earnings are allocated at year-end. (2) Depreciation is allocated at year-end. (3) Includes the trade-in of golf carts -$100,500. Further information about projects and financing are located in the 2018-2022 CIP and 2018-2019 Budget. City of Golden Valley Monthly Budget Report - Brookview Golf Course Enterprise Fund May 2018 (unaudited) Course opened April 27 Over 2018 May YTD (Under)% Budget Actual Actual Budget Current Revenue Interest Earnings 2,880 0 0 (2,880)0.00%(1) Charges for Services 469,965 43,707 199,877 (270,088)42.53% Total Revenue 472,845 43,707 199,877 (272,968)42.27% Expenses: Motor Vehicle Licensing 423,335 31,357 171,152 (252,183)40.43% Total Expenses 423,335 31,357 171,152 (252,183)40.43% (1) Interest Earnings are allocated at year-end. City of Golden Valley Monthly Budget Report - Motor Vehicle Licensing Enterprise Fund May 2018 (unaudited) Over 2018 May YTD (Under)% Budget Actual Actual Budget Current Revenue Interest Earnings 50,000 0 0 (50,000)0.00%(1) Interest Earnings-Other 0 0 0 0 Storm Sewer Charges 2,475,000 208,614 941,477 (1,533,523)38.04% Bassett Creek Watershed 0 0 0 0 (5) Miscellaneous Receipts 313,300 0 4,500 (308,800) Sale or Loss of Assets 0 0 1,500 1,500 Total Revenue 2,838,300 208,614 947,477 (1,890,823)33.38% Expenses: Storm Utility 2,707,450 36,569 685,646 (2,021,804)25.32%(2) (3) Street Cleaning 128,595 18,113 44,430 (84,165)34.55% Environmental Control 336,790 20,911 85,934 (250,856)25.52% Debt Service Payments 65,000 0 31,750 (33,250)0.00%(3) Total Expenses 3,237,835 75,593 847,760 (2,390,075)26.18%(4) (1) Interest Earnings are allocated at year-end. (2) Depreciation is allocated at year-end and. (3) Debt service payments and Medicine Lake Rd Improvements will be reimbursed by TIF. (4) Reserves are being used that were planned. City of Golden Valley Monthly Budget Report - Storm Utility Enterprise Fund May 2018 (unaudited) 2018 Equipment Replacement Fund (CIP) - Fund 5700 2018 May YTD Budget Total Actual Remaining Revenues: Sale of Assets 35,000 0 75,650 40,650 Miscellaneous 0 7,405 20,399 20,399 DUI Fund Transfer 40,000 0 80,000 Interest Earnings (allocated at year end)23,538 0 0 (23,538) Total Revenues 98,538 7,405 176,049 37,511 (4) Expenditures: Program #Project Number Project Name 5701 V&E-001 Marked Squad Cars (Police)100,000 73,990 133,919 (33,919)(5) 5702 V&E-002 Computers and Printers (Finance)80,000 3,065 28,841 51,159 (1) V&E-009 Front End Loader (Street)260,000 0 0 260,000 V&E-022 Sign Truck (Street)120,000 0 0 120,000 5760 V&E-037 Aerial Ladder (Fire)575,000 0 905,753 (330,753)(2) V&E-060 Rescue Vehicle (Fire)90,000 0 0 90,000 V&E-095 Pickup Truck (Police)40,000 0 0 40,000 V&E-116 Bobcat Toolcat (Park)50,000 0 0 50,000 V&E-130 Rotary Mower (Park)25,000 0 0 25,000 5709 V&E-135 Body Cameras/Dash Cams/Software (Police)24,070 24,756 142,932 (118,862)(3) V&E-145 Skid Steer Loader (Street)55,000 0 0 55,000 5710 V&E-151 Fire Pumper (Fire)600,000 2,303 601,145 (1,145) Total Expenditures 2,019,070 104,114 1,812,590 207,625 (1) Computers are replaced every 4-5 years and purchased throughout the year based on available time. (2) In 2017, this included $400,000 for the first half payment that was not billed until 2018. (3) In 2016, a transfer was made to the equipment replacement fund to purchase video dash cams and body cameras together. (4) In 2017, $1,200,000 was transferred from positive performance. (5) In 2018, monies were transferred for an additional squad from the DUI Fund. Further information about projects and financing are located in the 2018-2022 CIP and 2018-2019 Budget. Over 2018 May YTD (Under)% Budget Actual Actual Budget Current Revenue Brookview CC Rentals 157,815 16,415 40,602 (117,213)25.73% Backyard Play Area 326,500 24,395 106,586 (219,914)32.65% Miscellaneous Revenues 5,500 0 0 (5,500)0.00% Interest on Investments 100 0 0 (100)0.00%(1) Total Revenue 489,915 40,810 147,188 (342,727)30.04% Expenses: General Area Rooms 290,790 18,949 96,474 (194,316)33.18%(2) Indoor Play Area 107,210 4,553 31,494 (75,716)29.38% Banquet Facility 87,945 5,320 29,277 (58,668)33.29% Total Expenses 485,945 28,822 157,245 (328,700)32.36% (1) Interest Earnings are allocated at year-end. (2) Staff Time/Supplies for Brookview Rental City of Golden Valley Monthly Budget Report - Brookview Center Special Revenue Fund May 2018 (unaudited) Over 2018 May YTD (Under)% Budget Actual Actual Budget Current Revenue Pull Tab (10%) Revenues 30,000 4,873 14,577 (15,423)48.59%(3) Fundraisers 30,000 2,966 19,524 (10,476)65.08%(4) Interest on Investments 700 0 0 (700)0.00%(1) Total Revenue 60,700 7,839 34,101 (26,599)56.18% Expenses: Supplies 17,100 0 5,975 (11,125)34.94% Allocations 60,000 10,125 24,275 (35,725)40.46%(2) (5) Total Expenses 77,100 10,125 30,250 (46,850)39.23% (1) Interest Earnings are allocated at year-end. (2) Allocations in 2018 are $60,000. (3) Pull Tab revenues are thru April. (4) Solicitation Letters -$2,346.57-YTD; should be allocated to designation (4) Run/Walk -$17,177 YTD (5) Crisis Connection is closing June 30. The $3500 will be allocated in 2019. Fund Balance at 12/31/17 was $213,524. City of Golden Valley Monthly Budget Report - Human Services Fund May 2018 (unaudited) 2018 Buiiding Improvement Fund (CIP) - Fund 5200 2018 May YTD Budget Total Actual Remaining Revenues: Transfer from General Fund 350,000 0 0 (350,000)(1) Interest Earnings (allocated at year end)7,718 0 0 (7,718) Total Revenues 357,718 0 0 (357,718) Expenditures: Project Name Carpet Replacement-City Buildings 30,000 32,021 32,021 (2,021) Generators 35,000 0 0 35,000 Air Compressor 10,000 0 0 10,000 Installation of Building Security Systems 30,000 120 5,878 24,122 Public Buildings Roof Replacement 270,000 2,897 25,318 244,682 Workstation Replacements 40,000 1,475 12,980 27,020 Window Replacements-Various Buildings 25,000 0 0 25,000 Total Expenditures 440,000 36,513 76,197 363,803 (1)Transfer will be made in June. 2018 Park Improvement Fund (CIP) - Fund 5600 2018 May YTD Budget Total Actual Remaining Revenues: Transfer from General Fund 300,000 0 250,000 (50,000) Park Dedication Fee 0 0 0 0 Hennepin County Youth Sports Grant 150,000 0 100,000 (50,000) Little League/Youth Associations/Play Eq Grants 15,000 0 18,500 3,500 Other Donations 0 0 21,454 21,454 Golden Valley Community Foundation 0 0 35,000 35,000 Interest Earnings (allocated at year end)4,915 0 0 (4,915) Total Revenues 469,915 0 424,954 (44,961) Expenditures: Project Name Bleacher, Etc Replacement 25,000 4,185 23,288 1,712 Park Trail and Parking Lot Improvements 40,000 0 4,659 35,341 Play Structure Replacement 55,000 0 82 54,918 Ball Field Lighting 250,000 23,450 237,171 12,829 Outdoor Basketball and Hoop Replacement 28,000 0 0 28,000 Park Signage Replacement 10,000 0 10,658 (658) Sun Shelter Replacement/Additions 50,000 0 0 50,000 Tennis & Pickle Ball Court Resurfacing 30,000 0 0 30,000 Wildwood Pickleball Courts 60,000 0 0 60,000 Relamp Athletic Field and Rink Lights 25,000 0 0 25,000 Dugout, Fence and Field Replacement 55,000 0 1,281 53,719 Tennis Court Reconstruction 150,000 0 0 150,000 Total Expenditures 778,000 27,635 277,139 500,861 Further information about projects and financing are located in the 2018-2022 CIP and 2018-2019 Budget. Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting June 19, 2018 Agenda Item 4. A. Public Hearing - MS4 General Permit, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program, 2017 Annual Report to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Prepared By Jeff Oliver, PE, City Engineer Eric Eckman, Development and Assets Supervisor Summary As authorized by the Clean Water Act of 1972 and its amendments, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) oversees the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit program which regulates point and non-point sources of pollution into our nation’s waterways. Point sources include pipes and ditches, and non-point sources include overland precipitation runoff. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) manages the permit program for EPA in Minnesota. Cities like Golden Valley, which operate their own storm sewer systems, are required to obtain a Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) General Permit from the MPCA. The permit allows Golden Valley to discharge stormwater into public receiving waters. It also requires that the City develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program (SWPPP) to reduce the contamination of stormwater runoff and prohibit illicit discharges. Golden Valley’s SWPPP addresses the six minimum control measures outlined in the MS4 permit requirements: 1. Public Education and Outreach 2. Public Involvement and Participation 3. Illicit Discharge, Detection, and Elimination 4. Construction Site Runoff Control 5. Post Construction Runoff Control 6. Pollution Prevention and Good Housekeeping The holding of an annual public meeting and preparation of an annual report are requirements of the MS4 permit. The meeting has been advertised for June 19, 2018, at 6:30 pm. The City must create a record of the public comments received, either written or oral. The public input must be considered and a record of decision must be added to the annual report to MPCA. Attachments • Resolution Issuing a Negative Declaration of Need for Revisions to the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program (1 page) Recommendation Motion to adopt Resolution Issuing a Negative Declaration of Need for Revisions to the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program. Resolution 18-42 June 19, 2018 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION ISSUING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF NEED FOR REVISIONS TO THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PROGRAM WHEREAS, the City prepared and submitted to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) its permit application for operation of the City’s Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) on March 10, 2003; and WHEREAS, the City was reissued coverage by MPCA for its current MS4 permit on April 14, 2014; and WHEREAS, the permit requires that the City develop and implement a plan for regulating and improving stormwater discharge, commonly referred to as the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program (SWPPP); and WHEREAS, staff has been working to meet the objectives set forth in the SWPPP and is required to report to the MPCA on the status of the plan’s implementation on an annual basis; and WHEREAS, the City has placed notification of a public hearing in the City’s official newspaper and has held a public hearing to report on progress made in implementation of the SWPPP and to take public testimony; and WHEREAS, comments made during the public hearing will be incorporated into the City Council record. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City of Golden Valley has determined that no revisions to the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program are required and staff is hereby directed to file the annual report with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. ___________________________________ Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: _____________________________ Kristine A Luedke, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by the City Clerk. Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting June 19, 2018 60 day deadline: June 26, 2018 Agenda Item 4. B. Public Hearing - Amendment to the General Land Use Plan Map - 5530-5540 Golden Valley Road and 1530 Welcome Avenue North Prepared By Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager Summary This application was heard by the Planning Commission at its regular meeting on May 30, 2018, and was recommended for denial (7-0). The applicant has since withdrawn the proposal. Recommended Action No action is required. Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting June 19, 2018 60 day deadline: June 26, 2018 Agenda Item 4. C. Public Hearing - Amendment to the Official Zoning Map - 5530-5540 Golden Valley Road and 1530 Welcome Avenue North Prepared By Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager Summary This application was heard by the Planning Commission at its regular meeting on May 30, 2018, and was recommended for denial (7-0). The applicant has since withdrawn the proposal. Recommended Action No action required. Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting June 19, 2018 120 day deadline: August 23, 2018 Agenda Item 4. D. Public Hearing - Minor Subdivision - 7040 Glenwood Avenue Prepared By Amy Morgan, Planning Intern Summary The applicant, Peter Knaeble, had previously submitted a subdivision proposal for the property at 7040 Glenwood Avenue, which included keeping the existing single-family home while subdividing the lot into a total of three lots. This proposal was withdrawn. The new subdivision proposal submitted April 25, 2018, proposes to tear down the existing house, subdivide the lot into two lots, and move driveway access from Glenwood Avenue to the Highway 55 frontage road. Evaluation The property is guided for Low Density Residential use in the Comprehensive Plan and zoned Single Family Residential (R-1). It sits southeast of the intersection of Glenwood Avenue and Olson Memorial Highway, but is adjacent to the frontage road that parallels the highway on its south side. Changes to the minimum lot area requirement of the Subdivision Code made in 2015 require a calculation of the average lot size of all residential lots within 250 feet of the subject property in the R-1 Zoning District. For 7040 Glenwood Avenue, the result of this calculation is approximately 15,279 square feet. Therefore, the required minimum lot size of each new lot is 10,000 square feet. The existing lot is 37,897 square feet. The proposed Lot 1, to the west, would be 18,797 square feet. The proposed Lot 2, to the east, would be 15,137 square feet. Corner lots must have a width of 100 feet at the 35 foot setback line and at a point 70 feet into the lot. Non-corner lots much have a width of 80 feet at the 35 foot setback line and a point 70 feet into the lot. Both of the proposed lots meet these width requirements. The proposed subdivision would move driveway access for the existing lot from Glenwood Ave to the frontage road. Area sufficient to accommodate a potential future cul-de-sac would be dedicated for public use should the City approve one in the location. The intersection of the frontage road with Glenwood Avenue, south of Highway 55, has been identified in the draft 2040 Comprehensive Plan as an area in need of improvement due to safety concerns. Construction of a cul-de-sac would likely only occur following improvements to the intersection at Douglas Drive and Highway 55 to the east. The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval (7-0) at its meeting on May 30, 2018. No residents spoke at the informal public hearing. Attachments • Location Map (1 page) • Planning Commission Minutes dated May 30, 2018 (2 pages) • Memo to the Planning Commission dated May 30, 2018 (3 pages) • Applicant’s Narrative (1 page) • Tree Inventory and Mitigation Plan (2 pages) • Plans submitted April 25, 2018 (5 pages) Recommended Action Motion to approve the Minor Subdivision at 7040 Glenwood, subject to the following conditions: 1. Right-of-way sufficient to accommodate the roadway, on-street bike lanes, and a sidewalk along the east side of Glenwood Avenue shall be dedicated on the Final Plat. 2. The exact location of the potential future cul-de-sac shall be determined by City Staff prior to approval of the Final Plat. 3. The City Attorney will determine if a title review is necessary prior to approval of the Final Plat. 4. A deferred special assessment of $4,900 shall be paid before release of the Final Plat. 5. A park dedication fee of $3,750 shall be paid before release of the Final Plat. "it �,115 F' 7120 `G\I 521 525 530 6 ` a J\\ 7031 U 7201 •■i c 6030 U 7151 @ 7100 7040 7020 $01 7101 SS' Subject Property 680 U20 6810 "376921 Kingston Grt T040 7001 6931 6830 7045 6017 6607 H27 6650 7031 6860 7210 7202 7 N40 O6900 6630 7218 7182 7025 0- 7Y- 6820 41 7156 7146 L 6895 N 6855 "'a 40 Harold Ave 6665 6835 661 6875 an bo?is Park 340 6920 6945 6910 6815 Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission May 30, 2018 Page 16 D by Johnson, secon d by Pockl and motion unanimously to recommend approv nging the de nation of as Drive North on the General Land Use Map from t e ' o Medium-Low Density Residential. MOVED by B seco ed by nd motion carried unanimously to reco approval of re ning the property as Drive North from Single y (R-1) Residential to oderate Density (R-2) Residential. 7. Informal Public Hearing — Minor Subdivision — 7040 Glenwood Avenue — Marie Estates — SU17-16 Applicant: Peter Knaeble Address: 7040 Glenwood Avenue Purpose: To reconfigure the existing single family residential lot into two new single family residential lots. Morgan reminded the Commission that a proposal regarding dividing this property into three lots was heard at the March 26 Planning Commission meeting. She stated that the original proposal has been withdrawn and that a new application has been submitted to demolish the existing single family home and subdivide the property into two new single family residential lots. She stated that the driveway access would be moved from Glenwood Avenue to the Highway 55 Frontage Road and that land would be dedicated for a potential future cul-de-sac along the Highway 55 Frontage Road. Morgan referred to the subdivision requirements and stated that the minimum lot size in this case is 10,000 square feet. For the interior lot a lot width of 80 feet must be maintained at the front setback line to a depth of 70 feet, and the corner lot must maintain 100 feet of width at the front setback line to a depth of 70 feet as well. Morgan showed the Commissioners an illustration of the existing conditions and of the lots after the proposed subdivision and stated that the proposed new lots meet the square footage and lot width requirements. She noted that a notification letter was sent to property owners within 500 feet and that no responses were received and that a tree survey has been completed. Morgan discussed the eight conditions for approval or denial of a Minor Subdivision listed in City Code and said that staff is recommending approval of this proposed subdivision as the proposal does meet all the Code requirements. Black said he noticed that there are R-2 properties in the area and asked if this property borders those. Morgan stated that there are R-2 properties across Glenwood Avenue. Segelbaum noted that one of the conditions for approval or denial of a subdivision is that easements are granted for necessary public purposes. He questioned if the potential future cul-de-sac will be an easement or if the property owner will be ceding the land to the City. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission May 30, 2018 Page 17 Morgan stated that the land for the cul-de-sac would be dedicated or given to the City. Segelbaum said he doesn't understand how the City has the authority to require that. Zimmerman stated that some of the land will be dedicated to the County and some will be maintained by easement. He added that in most instances the City asks for land dedication and not easements. Segelbaum questioned why the word easement is used in the Code if that is the case because it seems like the City is asking more of the property owner than it has a right to. Zimmerman said it is a common requirement when the City or County needs right-of-way for a public purpose. Segelbaum asked if the property isn't used if it is given back to the applicant. Zimmerman said that has been the practice. Segelbaum said it seems that the City is restricting the building envelopes without having the authority in place to build the cul-de-sac and in the meantime the applicant isn't getting the benefit of the property. Zimmerman stated that this is listed in the Comp Plan as a desired traffic improvement area. He explained that as an alternative, the City could purchase the land after the fact but then there could be nonconformities created. Segelbaum said the City should purchase the land if it wants to build the cul-de-sac. Peter Knaeble, Applicant, said he has had numerous meetings with city staff and he agrees with staff's recommendation regarding the cul-de-sac and he also agrees it is probably a taking but he's come to the conclusion that he supports staff's recommendation. He stated that shifting the cul-de-sac further to the west as staff recommends would be detrimental to the buildable area of Lot 1 but he is willing to work with staff regarding the final location of the cul-de-sac. Baker opened the public hearing. Seeing and hearing no one wishing to comment, Baker closed the public hearing. Segelbaum said it seems to him that the City is asking for something beyond what is required but the applicant is fine with it so he supports this proposal. MOVED by Brookins, seconded by Johnson and motion carried unanimously to approve the proposed minor subdivision of 7040 Glenwood Avenue subject to the following conditions: 1. Right-of-way sufficient to accommodate the roadway, on-street bike lanes, and a sidewalk along the east side of Glenwood Avenue shall be dedicated on the Final Plat. 2. The exact location of the potential future cul-de-sac shall be determined by City staff prior to approval of the Final Plat. 3. The City Attorney will determine if a title review is necessary prior to approval of the Final Plat. 4. A deferred special assessment of $4,900 shall be paid before release of the Final Plat. 5. A park dedication fee of $3,750 shall be paid before release of the Final Plat. Co cil Liaiso ort No rep as given. city o� lJ i d C M E M 0 R A N D U M valley 1 Plannin Department 763-593-8095/763-593-8109(fax) Date: May 30, 2018 To: Golden Valley Planning Commission From: Amy Morgan, Planning Intern Subject: Informal Public Hearing on Preliminary Plan for Marie Estates—7040 Glenwood Avenue— Peter Knaeble, Applicant Summary of Request Dennis Mlachnik, represented by Peter Knaeble, is proposing to subdivide the property located at 7040 Glenwood Avenue into two lots. There is one existing single-family home on this lot which would be torn down in order to create two lots. Background The applicant had previously submitted a subdivision proposal for this property which included keeping the existing single-family home while subdividing the lot into a total of three lots. This proposal has since been withdrawn. The new subdivision proposal submitted April 25, 2018, proposes to tear down the existing house, subdivide the lot into two lots, and move driveway access from Glenwood Avenue to the Highway 55 frontage road. The property is guided for Low Density Residential use in the Comprehensive Plan and zoned Single Family Residential (R-1). It sits southeast of the intersection of Glenwood Avenue and Olson Memorial Highway, but is adjacent to the frontage road that parallels the highway on its south side. The applicant has mailed out a neighborhood letter to surrounding properties. There have been no responses at this time. Staff Review Changes to the minimum lot area requirement of the Subdivision Code made in 2015 require a calculation of the average lot size of all residential lots within 250 feet of the subject property in the R-1 Single Family Residential Zoning District. If the average is greater than 18,000 square feet, the new required minimum lot size becomes 15,000 square feet. If the average is less than 18,000 square feet, the required minimum lot size remains at 10,000 square feet. 1 For 7040 Glenwood Avenue, the average size of the lots within 250 feet is approximately 15,279 square feet. Therefore, the required minimum lot size of each new lot is 10,000 square feet. The existing lot is 37,897 square feet. The proposed Lot 1, to the west, would be 18,797 square feet. The proposed Lot 2, to the east, would be 15,137 square feet. City Code requires that each non-corner lot have a minimum of 80 feet of width at the front setback line and maintain 80 feet of width for 70 feet of depth. It also requires that any corner lot have a minimum of 100 feet of width at the front setback line and maintain 100 feet of width for 70 feet of depth. Both of the proposed lots have sufficient width. The proposed subdivision would move driveway access for the existing lot from Glenwood Ave to the frontage road. This proposal meets all zoning and site requirements. As part of staff review, the Engineering Division provided comments on the proposed subdivision and requested the following items be addressed in the Final Plat: 1. Hennepin County has requested the dedication of right-of-way along the east side of Glenwood Avenue to accommodate the roadway, on-street bike lanes, and a planned sidewalk. The County and the City will work with the applicant to minimize the width of right-of-way needed in exchange for the dedication of a walkway easement along Glenwood Avenue. 2. The Preliminary Plat shows a proposed location for a potential future cul-de-sec. The exact placement would need to be determined with City staff prior to the approval of the Final Plat. This potential cul-de-sac could be constructed in conjunction with future improvements to the Highway 55/Douglas Drive intersection north of the Perpich School. Securing funding for this project is a high priority for the City Council. Although the land for a future cul-de-sac would be dedicated in conjunction with the recording of the Final Plat, any decision to utilize this area would involve a public process. 3. A deferred special assessment of$4,900 for the subject property must be paid prior to release of the Final Plat. Evaluation of Minor Subdivision The proposed two-lot subdivision qualifies as a minor subdivision because the property located at 7040 Glenwood Avenue is an existing platted lot of record, the proposed subdivision will produce fewer than four lots, and the action will not create the need for public improvements. According to Section 12.50 of the City's Subdivision Code, the following are the regulations governing approval of minor subdivisions: 1. Minor subdivisions shall be denied if the proposed lots do not meet the minimum area and dimension requirements for the Zoning District in which they are located, or if vehicular access is not provided from an abutting improved street. Both lots would meet the minimum area and dimension requirements for the Low-Density Residential Zoning District and vehicle access would be moved from Glenwood Avenue to the frontage road. 2 2. A minor subdivision may be denied if the City Engineer determines that the lots are not buildable. The City Engineer finds that the lots are buildable. 3. A minor subdivision may be denied if there are no sewer and water connections available or if it is determined by the City Engineer that an undue strain will be placed on City utility systems by the addition of the new lots. The addition of a new lot would not place an undue strain on City utility systems. 4. Approval of the minor subdivision shall be conditioned on the granting of certain easements to the City. As included in the City Engineer's comments, a walkway easement would be required along Glenwood Avenue to provide space for a future sidewalk. Land dedication for a potential future cul-de-sac of the frontage road must also be included. 5. If public agencies other than the City have jurisdiction of the streets adjacent to the minor subdivision, the agencies will be given the opportunity to comment and approval may be conditioned on the requirements of the outside agency. The proposal is consistent with Hennepin County's requirements for Glenwood Avenue. 6. The City may ask for a review of title if required by the City Attorney for dedication of certain easements. The City Attorney will determine if such a title review is necessary prior to approval of the Final Plat. 7. The minor subdivision may be subject to park dedication requirements. A park dedication fee of $3,750 (6% of the estimated land value as calculated by Hennepin County with credit for one home) would be required for this two lot subdivision. 8. The conditions spelled out shall provide the only basis for denial of a minor subdivision. Approval will be granted to any application that meets the established conditions. All conditions have been met. Recommended Action Staff recommends approval of the proposed minor subdivision subject to the following conditions: 1. Right-of-way sufficient to accommodate the roadway, on-street bike lanes, and a sidewalk along the east side of Glenwood Avenue shall be dedicated on the Final Plat. 2. The exact location of the potential future cul-de-sac shall be determined by City staff prior to approval of the Final Plat. 3. The City Attorney will determine if a title review is necessary prior to approval of the Final Plat. 4. A deferred special assessment of$4,900 shall be paid before release of the Final Plat. 5. A park dedication fee of$3,750 shall be paid before release of the Final Plat. Attachments: Location Map (1 page) Applicant's Narrative (1 page) Tree Inventory and Mitigation Plan (2 pages) Plans submitted April 25, 2018 (5 pages) 3 MARIES ESTATES 7040 GLENWOOD AVE., GOLDEN VALLEY 4/23/18 PROJECT NARRATIVE This 0.84 acre site is located at the southeast corner of Hwy. 55 and Glenwood Ave. in Golden Valley. There is an existing 2200 sf 1.5 story home that sits on the northwest portion of the property. The property is wooded on the northern and western part of the site, and it contains 19 "significant" trees and 2 "legend" trees. We are proposing a minor subdivision to subdivide this property into two conforming single family lots. The existing home will be removed. This proposed subdivision meets all of the City's requirements for the R-1 Residential Zoning Standards. The proposed two lot subdivision would be an asset to this neighborhood and to the City of Golden Valley. It would allow for the construction two new homes for families looking for that opportunity in Golden Valley. PRELIMINARY TREE PRESERVATION AND MITIGATION FORM 4/23/2018 MARIE ESTATES 7040 GLENWOOD AVE.;GOLDEN VALLEY,MN Definitions(per GV Tree and Landscape Ordinance 4.32): "Hardwood 321- "Hardwood Deciduous Tree" Ironwood,catalpa,oak, hard maple,walnut, hickory,birch, black cherry, hackberry, locust,and basswood. "Softwood Deciduous Tree" Cottonwood,poplars/aspen,box elder,ash,willow,silver maple,and elm. "Significant Tree" Healthy hardwood deciduous tree 6"dia.or more Healthy softwood deciduous tree 12"dia.or more Healthy coniferous tree 4"dia.or more "Legacy Tree" Healthy hardwood deciduous tree 30"dia.or more Healthy coniferous tree 24"or more Tree inventory per Wayne Jacobson(MN DNR Tree Inspector#20104270)dated 1/25/18 PRELIM. TREE TREE TREE GV SAVE OR TREE NO. SPECIES SIZE(IN.) CONDITION TYPE REMOVE* 100 White Spruce coniferous 13 okay Significant SAVE 101 Red Pine coniferous 16 poor non-significant SAVE 102 White Spruce coniferous 9 okay Significant SAVE 103 Amer. Elm softwood dec. 26 poor non-significant SAVE 104 Cottonwood softwood dec. 46 good Significant SAVE 105 White Spruce coniferous 10 poor non-significant SAVE 106 White Spruce coniferous 13 okay Significant SAVE 107 White Spruce coniferous 13 okay Significant SAVE 108 White Spruce coniferous 11 okay Significant SAVE 109 Red Pine coniferous 18 poor non-significant SAVE 110 White Spruce coniferous 10 okay Significant SAVE 111 Cottonwood softwood dec. 23 okay Significant SAVE 112 Apple softwood dec. 12 bad non-significant SAVE 230 Bur Oak hardwood dec. 24 good Significant remove 231 Bur Oak hardwood dec. 24 good Significant remove 267 White Spruce coniferous 12 okay Significant remove 295 Cottonwood softwood dec. 48 okay Significant remove 297 White Spruce coniferous 15 poor non-significant remove 298 Balsam Fir coniferous 17 poor non-significant remove 299 Bur Oak hardwood dec. 38 okay Legacy remove 304 Box Elder softwood dec. 10 okay non-significant remove 305 Black Cherry hardwood dec. 16 bad non-significant remove 310 Silver Maple softwood dec. 54 okay Significant SAVE 521 White Spruce coniferous 16 bad non-significant SAVE 523 White Spruce coniferous 24 poor non-significant SAVE 524 Box Elder softwood dec. 18 okay Significant SAVE 525 White Spruce coniferous 10 dead non-significant SAVE 526 White Spruce coniferous 10 poor non-significant SAVE 529 White Spruce coniferous 15 bad non-significant remove 533 Box Elder softwood dec. 19 poor non-significant remove 537 White Spruce coniferous 18 poor non-significant remove 541 White Spruce coniferous 10 okay Significant SAVE 542 White Spruce coniferous 17 okay Significant remove 545 White Spruce coniferous 13 okay Significant remove 547 White Spruce coniferous 14 okay Significant SAVE 548 Red Pine coniferous 11 okay Significant SAVE 556 Bur Oak hardwood dec. 32 good Legacy SAVE * Subject to final house design. Total number of existing"significant'or"legend"trees on-site: 21 trees Total number of existing"significant'trees on-site: 19 trees Total number of existing'legacy"trees on-site: 2 trees Allowable number of significant and legacy trees that can be REMOVED 7 trees without mitigation(at 35%for single family,two-phase development) (per GV Tree and Landscape Ordinance 4.32) Total estimated number of significant or legacy trees to be REMOVED: 7 trees 33.3% removed Total estimated number of significant or legacy trees to be SAVED: 14 trees 66.7% saved WOO•liDwboalganu�ja}ad 009.1 •°N '69V----9r/rr/;,- ►.G 3 d ia.w+H r m.d NW A3 nVA N30100 0 r 91Z6-60�—Z l9 — � 31V1S3 3121VW $ ZZ-V99 NW 1(911Dn uaPI00 •010882 .m M •any POOMua10 1009 w„ w.v..1 W4 N 4 OD 3d `alga�uy{ as}ad °"° "°'�" `""°'!°.;:,; 133HS TULL P F ��<yy 5 W M F> _ Z y C > 0 e'er Hil"H_19 tr Hum Q 3 000*00000 0000000000 �� 0� z � ' I N�� Ailix � CL Li a- Li w Q � � z E— >- `t z Lj I > = z � Cl- � cf) � z >- cin -iW C) -i X �— ia� o:� f— W F- a- 0 DD 0- 0 IL z N '0AY 040ai Li j 71W y � A •N •any AesW =' .N •env Cas» T ti:t'LY.1 T.j, z O y F- U O o E ` 0 KJ, :'r'a= i Pb TaMa6p�b t° woo•liow6®alg9bu�a9jad tt"I .DN '°°"QV-'%°° 26-60�—Z l9 V 3'd %W-M -r m>oe NW Jl3MVA N3CW0 00 51 if � ua �' S31V S3 3wri $ ZZ-V55 NW IIoA PIOD •DaaaDM al M ^. anoonnua w,/o• of wj. n ! N 4 `V 3d Palgaouy; aaladSWWAW 19 $ a'°: ,> °Qa„ ldld AWNIM138d r P p ti > J S y F of W ZgWu jJ 1-H U i� z ��_ aD WWW as 0850 n-Uj Z H z K .~...~i 0 W W C - am l'�F �`SFZg p�p�44EE in i. WW I�Q }� N NNW Ra' 17+SJi�a 38 0 1-L. p vv z W pO _j_j U W o 2 2 J 3 w �kkR�kF �kk ym 4y Np mai M flpo,/j QQ J Q 3 Q II'1 DD Iv1 w w �0. N lyt Q 1. Hq WW O+ < iv O O.1 O O�Oj 03C�O 6 ¢a Z'Z � ay�ly j V V � V) J a O _ W� QW1''/ zHy x 1.3 .z..Z. a' 0 JU M AQ_'4• O =ci 0 Q Y.D 7 0 p 0 V)Vl r- W N L d � WZ vo_ .~..N �y DD�'�o If) d Z sh 13 3 IA zW �� XyWI�M G.•D.N WWN MCX IA 0 1A E 010 r Z I 00� �O �1-, 1N�12J>O 1r1\ W >O U W Qj� _U °� �,.oj .VO1 ajZ O ^ xx YONJUD-J T5}NG QZ O W >Z v P Oln EaQ� C V/o Y pvQUaY=3�y3NN N¢ V Zwy��,�•�Q�+ 5aa� EO .9 to�'�'� Q' O Com, W J`�R1¢pOUV O WW 1/1pW VZ 3 C O M® V a>- MQa N� 10 E O FPO-WAWNayl jp N p'-'W .Z•.Z Ot 3 y.-L -� O mN C VZW O U C- o C10 p" rp>DL z6 V c_OI U 3-0)- O,�;t�� V WW O� 010 0Ld Vz => - y.~..-.>WH NN 0 0 0 •C W O C O I $j d' Com•+ T p QV-) V EUI cc 03� wyl�aQr ,a,, � >^ O p c v:?. v Ow c o ailA pe N c� CN c OI-�QCiQ C10FLU�,\�'OD2 QpJ W R CI Zy W_N c-* 5 Y U' C M Y } -W >d CO -.0 0=2 OD 0 1� 2: G DrW V)...Fi Vi ViWY�.-. MM WO n• CO 0 � O 0 � �- � wDL vJ W ,,/ aO C��M � m:+O�C,4 Q' O >''� c W 0 �N OON-8�� ou l p cr 00 Of0 v J D1O�� 0 O � Or\ Jin p DO ��4oininNjnQ Q aOf a W Q >1./x�of pN aOr-0 rl O Vfa 100 a InMw M01� �'�31nM OD in N.-..-.=E Wra S of 1/1az W as um it1 ,1 1 „ O 111 111 O u it u 1'ii 1 11 1 . 1 iCD ; X11 C) 111L3 I ii i '1 y O It OI'ZEZ oON 'i W1i '3SV3 1111 Al -—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—- -— —-—-_—-—-—- — HSS ,S'ZT —I It It J 11 11 w M� � ti P4 y Ln 1 'iit 'itt t, w m /v cU O ti � I°° N IW c6 it 111 / / L _ S HSS , 'ZT IA 1 itLLJ / lu 81 ---------- ---------3SV3-1911 9------ 11 Q it 23/' Gro .._.._.._.._.,OS'Z5t .._.._.._..._.._.._.._.._.. ;1 Z ; l _. .— --.3SV3 n�aa-s------- 1 11 �_—_—_—_—_—_—_— i i ass 191 1 1X11 ( j y i C-)1 j 11 T- cull Coll, I , N 1 1 3 I I ^ I u) 1 1 = 11 ------j 1 1 J 1i �� / i 1 Q 11 I �- / 1 / J OD n N ' in 351 i i I Ln 11 i Z ii 1"d /�EPSi � /�•'•• i i i 1 � 11 1��" /19EWj / /�• ��''" i/ in 1 1 1 � 1ii / /,•� '1 PBB� 215.� / / / �� % �=f'"� 1 I P 1 N003 A _ =;= ! C) ar (n 1 M Lr) 1 C 1 I I I 1 i 1 I 1 I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I ' I I I � I 1 1 ; woo•Iloua6®9lg9pu�.ia49d +►erl •N 5126-60�—Z l9 3•d -M r mid NW A3IIVA N3a1OO OD ZZ�SS NW 'ballon uaPlo0 •o>«m """ S31V1S3 3121VW M 40 any pooMua10 1009 ' ''",�,,°"°;" NVId NOLLVAMS38d 3381 � � ado �� 3d 'algapuy{ ja}ad PAM,� �"'�� °_ >n NVId ONiavw € g WW W p Z Ix IN K zH Z F O$ c _ �B��N�1 3 � o � I11x � 11 111 1it 11 1 11 O 11 1 I O 11 I f W '1 11 J 1 Z 11 Ld l 11 1„ Z LI.- it Li A 1 Q' 11111 LD Ell ' '1 11 OU 1 11 'i0 W 11 v�1i LL. • deSSS ,S'ZT IJi ;; liIOD U�CV) ED ;3 n X111" Ii'i1 u C3 COw � 3 a m p I 0 1 A 11 1 11 — 1 ass ,S'ZT J 1; '/'---- L — — — — — — — 1 17 11 2 " `_ W2j. .._. _.. ti. 1 Q it ! T -b— 6 ii OI -� Z ii lsl,�j j � — — — — —� — ass 191 C6 LL.ON PQ i N',1 IIII Co. F-I o (U �� H U7 1 1It 01 -- � x J� 1 1 1 �00 / �� O 11 I J 11 I `` 0�iQ iiOD MI / J / (Y- 0O3 Ld 11 1 1 i i 11 P�E{• 1��y � '- 1 1 � � 1 i t/) ii I i�� 5196��- ve'•�°b� i!%� / i N Cn \ cn - ' I � \ / � ' �/ '�- ' 1 11 III �••••, I I CD I I 1 1 I I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 I 1 1 I I I I I I I I ' I� 1 1 1 wo3'ilnua6®9lgaou�.i9}ad 1►QY1 V+ '°.a—Wr7CVV-°.,0 . 5126-60C-Z l9 3-d .n d NW Jl3TIVA N3a1W O '°" _ _ ZZ�SS NW Aallpn u9Pl09 14° SRV1S3 31HVN1 '-'AV pooMualo loo9 "a 10..o,.1 .,0,11 win ` 4 0 3d 'algaouy{ ,salad SM=„�1 ="Aq. AMC =a Aw"od.' NVId Aimn a� S j �A W y F ; U) z *20 a 0 a ZoF 3 0 0 " A� o ' � n,o � IITxx� 11 1 11 1 1 ; '11 1 11 O � 11 1 O 1 1 11, 1 11 011, 1� 11 I \ 1 'll 11 Q r-31 111 3 J 1 1 It it ~ It z1 '„ a W 1 11 l7 � 3 111 1 ,oraea 0ON Z V) 1 x'11 yf _ 1ii i Uii 11 J OD v� `3 M u o u 1 1{1 M ioo 0�It 1 ao y 11 N �� .I� I I^ NM I� ' LO 1' a v .191 �-.•; �i I Ico -j IN pp p a) 11 % Cl L — — — — ass ,s'zi J 1 ;; 1 , 1 It _ °D' ass ,SI ly 1 m , v 1i oii , � � 1`') y/ l ; 3 o OD 10 11 lilt I �' '1 Az - I ^ ; LLI 111 it 1 ; I 1it it ii Si i / 1 1 >11 It ' i , � ;— " �'• -� �!�' ;- In N 1 � l I 1\R / / It It It I,� M I y �, o w t L) _ c) ; / W -' U I 1 II I W \ 'l.Lt 1 1 � W '""I I x % F- W F- % Q I- 3 LLJ F r 1 I I 1 I , 1 , 1 ' , I— W al a) a! v O N Y N + H an j W C 75O A C ° C ro TL 'c o 3 w w m a ° YC u c wcm t0 � ° oY cl. vwv m &o o w - e O umoEZ t 6o N 0 a0 W x O N° C a C n>•u m 6 e-1 O N ° Z a0.. C al a a! y E,y i z ES•av °Erj ° oE O al Y'< N _ 5 E C) C ^ o m C °o r ` O 30 m N L w V1 OC O 00 30 1 w 01 O V m o U rcA Z Q� v o (L) I- 2 V) vl N OOo V) -� N ? }' C m al W al v o oco a O �± a L O0 z Y ° C N U d a C _ V mpC V) ~ O O n C L N 00 VV to V i N 7 O Ccu 92 -C aL-. v� a '^ in a N vi ^' ? O y M o Z L L 0 m e a w z Q v+ rl J v u " " u a1 $ m = v c o o m m « g m w Vi y S v N v Z Z Y Z o Ln ^ Q Y Y a a _ a U vmi o 3 z Ci O O at $ o » 110 c v v N L n 3 o a O 'c > ! > y J Q L Z C C a ¢ O m m LL O L al O .-i COa 00 Ln Z Z H O L O � C _ _ Y o Z in O N v w ^ ° VV) w c/) u 01 C C V, al w m o d' ° c Z o f 'm u� ro 5 v a, m y m C c f0 L •-i O O " V 0 O .� m m C O O d F- N V7 Vl .0 m a z ,^w M a a _ LA u O CD Z � lL W 0 cfl O Z z O? Z LINE WHICH INTERSECTS THE NORTH LINE OF THE M �\ /'� // z -cLn n 1 fn FIDISTANT NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER V J 258.8 FEET EAST OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER o / p = OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (— Cil O �/ / Z N 1_ I z �� // Q Ln m m uo T' = L w // � \ \ 00.00 Ll b F. V) Lli 100 06— / I / / �6 z Q I \r S T- C) O m — ctia n m \ / / \ 'n \ Li m O o / / \\ r3\ z o o \ 1 rn I \ \ L� W w • rn \I / bo \ \fO 4 � y+J O O o\ O IL Vnn) oO "' w_ X 1 1 co " I _ I I I J O On 'O°�° / v I \ Q O \ Q O LJ m U oI\�- , a o� d / / / , ue l zOf 0 Q z Ln T-0 o o ,ad LLJ W= LLJz \ Z� 0 J co X9,25 w LLJ U) 40 Mgt =0 0 I I °F °°yid II I I �°�NSER��211 dee00 w Q / CO3 - NORTH-SOUTH QUARTER LINE OF SECTION 32 Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting June 19, 2018 60 day deadline: June 26, 2018 Agenda Item 4. E. Public Hearing ‐ RLT Second Addition PUD No. 91, Amendment 4 ‐ 8905 Wayzata Boulevard Prepared By Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager Summary The Luther Company is applying for a Major Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment in order to expand the existing building and reconfigure the display and parking areas at the front entrance of the Jaguar Land Rover dealership. Proposal As part of a remodel and expansion of the Jaguar Land Rover building, the footprint of the showroom would be extended by roughly 5,000 square feet to the south, displacing some of the existing customer parking. The applicant has proposed to accommodate this parking by removing a row of display vehicles and squaring off the area that would now provide customer parking. While the paved area would extend no further into the front yard setback, it would increase the amount of pavement in the front yard setback on either side. Two trees would be removed as part of this work; two new deciduous trees are proposed to be planted. To compensate for this increase in impervious surface in front of the showroom, the applicant has proposed to remove the off‐road display area along the west property line and replace it with turf and two coniferous trees. This would result in a net decrease of the impervious area on the site by approximately 2,023 square feet. Evaluation Planning staff supports the proposed modification to the PUD and finds it would help to improve stormwater quality by reducing the amount of impervious surfaces on the site. Further, the new exterior cladding would improve the appearance of the property. Concerns over vehicle deliveries that occasionally happen off‐site on the street suggest the need for new restrictions in the PUD permit to ensure this does not happen and traffic can flow smoothly along Wayzata Boulevard. The Planning Commission reviewed the proposal on May 30, 2018, and recommended approval (7‐ 0) with one added condition that enhanced landscaping be considered. Staff finds that the expansion of the showroom and the reconfiguration of the front parking area in the existing PUD in order to renovate and improve the existing building do not conflict with the initial findings supporting the RLT Second Addition PUD No. 91. Specifically: 1. Quality Site Planning. The modifications do not negatively impact the overall quality of the site. 2. Preservation. The proposal does not significantly impact desirable portions of the site’s characteristics. It does remove an impervious area and provides a better opportunity to positively impact infiltration and stormwater quality. 3. Efficient – Effective. The proposed amendment would utilize land efficiently by allowing for the improvement of an established business in an existing building. 4. Consistency. The use being proposed remains consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan which calls for the preservation and expansion of facilities housing major employers. 5. General Health. The PUD amendment would not impact the general health, safety, or welfare of the people of the City. 6. Meets Requirements. The proposed modification does not conflict with the standards applied to the existing PUD and does not invalidate the Intent and Purpose provision of the City Code. Staff recommends approval of Amendment 4 to RLT Second Addition PUD No. 91, subject to the following conditions: 1. All vehicle deliveries shall take place on‐site and shall not take place on the street. 2. At the time of permitting, staff shall work with the applicant to implement the landscaping plan prepared by LANDFORM and dated June 13, 2018. This approval is subject to all other state, federal, and local ordinances, regulations, or laws with authority over this development. Attachments  Location Map (1 page)  Memo to the Planning Commission dated May 30, 2018 (4 pages)  Planning Commission Minutes dated May 30, 2018 (4 pages)  Applicant’s Narrative dated April 27, 2018 (3 pages)  Plans submitted April 27, 2018 (9 pages)  Landscaping plan submitted June 13, 2018 (7 pages)  Amended PUD Permit (3 pages)  Ordinance #640, Approval of Major PUD Amendment Plan, RLT Second Addition P.U.D. No. 91, Amendment #4, The Luther Company, LLLP, Applicant (2 pages) Recommended Action Motion to adopt Ordinance #640, Approval of RLT Second Addition PUD No. 91, Amendment 4, The Luther Company, Applicant. Subject Property m nos OW5 g A 9191 c 9393 •Ptv tl 9595 - 1�p c 9393 C1ty- of 1 golden M FMORAN Dt,) M llva ey Physical Development Department 763-593-8095/763-593-8109(fax) Date: May 30, 2018 To: Golden Valley Planning Commission From: Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager Subject: Informal Public Hearing— RLT Second Addition PUD No. 91, Amendment 4—8905 Wayzata Boulevard —The Luther Company, Applicant Summary The Luther Company is applying for a Major Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment in order to expand the existing building and reconfigure the display and parking areas at the front entrance of the Jaguar Land Rover dealership. Background PUD No. 91 was created in 2001 and initially contained only the Toyota building. In 2005, the PUD was amended to include the Jaguar Land Rover building. In 2007, a minor amendment was approved for the Toyota building in order to allow for the construction of an attached car wash bay. In 2015, another minor amendment was approved for the Jaguar Land Rover building to allow for an addition for new car deliveries. This addition has not been constructed. As part of a corporate decision to update the look of all Jaguar and Land Rover dealerships,the showroom in Golden Valley would be expanded and remodeled.The new requirements would necessitate the reconfiguration of the parking area in front of the building and the removal of a display area. Existing Conditions The size of the current PUD is roughly 8 acres, though the western half containing the Jaguar Land Rover building is only 5 acres. The property is bounded to the north by 1-394, to the south by Wayzata Boulevard,to the west by the Porsche and Audi dealerships, and to the east by General Mills Boulevard. The west half of the site (the Jaguar Land Rover dealership) consists of a 41,265 square foot building surrounded by extensive parking for inventory and customers. An off-road display area sits along the western property line. 1 r iOs �i�.��.I r' - �F II�t !!fit_.�� M�►�� •,a �,� �� "�!1 1P L _z r att�exat TLi' P'i5' ! Ids ! .r tern ' �- :`a.3 r 1414 a F 'e lid 1 s R r IFIVI IN AF1 -111111 ;, Existing Jaguar Land Rover dealership site Proposal As part of a remodel and expansion of the Jaguar Land Rover building, the footprint of the showroom would be extended by roughly 5,000 square feet to the south, displacing some of the existing customer parking. The applicant has proposed to accommodate this parking by removing a row of display vehicles and squaring off the area that would now provide customer parking. While the paved area would extend no further into the front yard setback, it would increase the amount of pavement in the front yard setback on either side. Four trees would be removed as part of this work; two new deciduous trees are proposed to be planted. 2 To compensate for this increase in impervious surface in front of the showroom, the applicant has proposed to remove the off-road display area along the west property line and replace it with turf and two coniferous trees. This would result in a net decrease of the impervious area on the site by approximately 2,023 square feet. The redesign of the parking area would create six additional parking spaces. The display area that was previously between the parking lot and the boulevard would be removed. A sidewalk connection that currently provides pedestrian access from the sidewalk along the north side of Wayzata Boulevard into the lot would be maintained. New aluminum composite cladding would be installed on the showroom and other portions of the south end of the building. The grey and champagne colors selected would complement the existing white painted precast concrete. Staff Review Planning staff supports the proposed modification to the PUD and finds it would help to improve stormwater quality by reducing the amount of impervious surfaces on the site. Further, the new exterior cladding would improve the appearance of the property. Concerns over vehicle deliveries that occasionally happen off-site on the street suggest the need for new restrictions in the PUD permit to ensure this does not happen and traffic can flow smoothly along Wayzata Boulevard. Engineering and Fire Safety Considerations As is standard practice for development proposals, plans were reviewed by the City's Engineering Division. A Tree and Landscape permit would be required to verify plantings and to ensure existing trees are protected. An Inflow and Infiltration inspection has been scheduled and any deficiencies would need to be addressed as part of this proposal. The Fire Department reviewed this proposal and had no comments or concerns. Evaluation Staff finds that the expansion of the showroom and the reconfiguration of the front parking area in the existing PUD in order to renovate and improve the existing building do not conflict with the initial findings supporting the RLT Second Addition PUD No. 91. Specifically: 1. Quality Site Planning. The modifications do not negatively impact the overall quality of the site. 2. Preservation. The proposal does not significantly impact desirable portions of the site's characteristics. It does remove an impervious area and provides a better opportunity to positively impact infiltration and stormwater quality. 3. Efficient—Effective. The proposed amendment would utilize land efficiently by allowing for the improvement of an established business in an existing building. 4. Consistency. The use being proposed remains consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan which calls for the preservation and expansion of facilities housing major employers. 3 5. General Health. The PUD amendment would not impact the general health, safety, or welfare of the people of the City. 6. Meets Requirements. The proposed modification does not conflict with the standards applied to the existing PUD and does not invalidate the Intent and Purpose provision of the City Code. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of Amendment 4 to RLT Second Addition PUD No. 91, subject to the following conditions: 1. All vehicle deliveries shall take place on-site and shall not take place on the street. This approval is subject to all other state, federal, and local ordinances, regulations, or laws with authority over this development. Attachments Location Map (1 page) Narrative (3 pages) Plans submitted April 27, 2018 (9 pages) 4 Regular Meeting of the Golden Valley Planning Commission May 30, 2018 Negular meeting of the Planning Co ission was held at the Golden Valley City Hall, Co Chambers, 7800 Golden Vall Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota, on Wednesday, May 30, Chair Baker called the eeting to order at 7 pm. Those present were ng Commi ioners An er, Black, Blum, Brookins, Johnson, Pockl, and Segel Als rese s Planning Manager Jason Zimmerman and Planning Intern n. 1. Approval of Minutes May 14, 201 egular Planning ommission Mee MOVED egelbaum, seconded b ohnson and motion carried o unanimously to a e the May 14, 2018, minute as submitted. (Commissioner Blum ed after t ' em.) 2. Informal Public Hearing — Major PUD Amendment— PU-91, The Luther Company, Amendment #4 Applicant: The Luther Company Address: 8905 Wayzata Blvd. Purpose: To allow for an expansion of the existing building and reconfigure the display and parking areas at the front entrance of the Jaguar/Land Rover dealership. Zimmerman referred to a site plan and noted that the PUD was created in 2001 and has been amended several times. He explained that the applicant is seeking approval of a Major PUD Amendment to allow for an expansion of the existing Jaguar/Land Rover showroom which would expand the building and in turn push the parking within the front yard setback area along the south. In exchange, the applicant would remove over 2,000 square feet of impervious surface area from the western portion of the property. Zimmerman stated that existing sidewalk connection into the site would be maintained. He explained that two trees would need to be removed and four trees would be planted and that a Tree and Landscape Permit will be needed to verify plantings and protect existing trees. He added that the showroom would have new aluminum cladding to enhance the building's appearance. Zimmerman stated that staff is recommending approval of the proposed PUD Amendment with a condition stating that all vehicle deliveries shall take place on-site and shall not take place on the street. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission May 30, 2018 Page 2 Blum referred to the staff report regarding the removal of trees and asked for clarification about how many trees will be removed and how many new ones would be planted. Zimmerman stated that two trees will be removed and four will be planted. Segelbaum noted that there isn't much landscaping on this site and asked if the City has discussed enhancing that with the applicant. Zimmerman referred to an aerial photo and discussed the landscaped areas. He added that the screening requirements don't apply to properties in this zoning district. Segelbaum asked about additional landscaping along the west side of the property. Zimmerman said staff has not asked for any additional landscaping other than what is required in the City Code. Johnson referred to the area where the parking expansion is proposed and asked about the difference between parking areas and display areas. Zimmerman pointed out the parking areas used for customer parking and the existing display area that will be removed and used for parking and will encroach into the setback area. Steve Sabraski, Landform Professional Services, representing the applicant, clarified that the proposed encroachment into the front setback will not be any greater than what is currently there though it would be wider. He said he does see opportunities for enhanced landscaping as well. Baker asked if there are landscaping opportunities elsewhere on the site. Sabraski said they are hoping to only impact and further enhance the areas proposed for change, not in other locations on the property as it may cause further issues. Baker asked how the area along the west side will be restored to permeable surface. Sabraski said it will mostly be turf along with two trees and additional shrubs. He added that it isn't really a visible area so they don't want to add too much landscaping there. Johnson asked about the parking calculations and requirements. Sabraski stated that they are adding a total of six parking spaces to the site and they feel they are able to accommodate the needs of their customers and employees on the site. Zimmerman stated that the parking numbers all fall within what is allowed in the PUD. Baker asked if the applicant has taken the City's lighting requirements into account. Sabraski stated that they are not proposing any enhancements to the existing lighting as a part of this application. Blum asked if the previous lighting requirements are grandfathered in and if past or present lighting rules are being followed with this proposal. Zimmerman explained that if lighting fixtures aren't being removed or replaced they can stay as they are. Blum clarified that the City is not requiring the applicant to upgrade their lighting to conform to the current rules. Zimmerman stated that the City is not requiring the applicant to change their existing lighting fixtures, but if they add new lighting that will have to conform to the current rules. Baker opened the public hearing. Seeing and hearing no one wishing to speak Baker closed the public hearing. Blum said he appreciates when a stakeholder invests and improves what they have and he finds there is low value in parking lots so he likes the fact that the applicant is swapping improved land for parking lot. He said he knows there has been discussion about the value Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission May 30, 2018 Page 3 dealerships bring to the community and said he is interested in knowing how the Planning Commission feels about being more assertive regarding requiring more landscaping and conforming lighting. Segelbaum said he hopes the applicant would be willing to enhance their landscaping. Baker said the increase in pervious surface is the applicant's gesture to enhance the landscaping but he doesn't want to see grass planted there. He added that a PUD should benefit the City and one could argue the City is getting an increase in pervious surface. He stated that he doesn't think there should be a requirement regarding enhanced landscaping but he would like to recommend enhanced landscaping at least in the area that is proposed to be converted to pervious surface. Blum suggested adding a condition that says the landscaping has to meet the satisfaction of staff and Council. Johnson said he wants to be careful about unintended consequences and added that increased sales and in turn increased taxes are a "give back" to the City. He suggested partnering with the applicant and other dealerships about their needs and objectives. Baker said that in regard to lighting he is concerned about changing the grandfathered precedent that is already in place because there is a lot of existing lighting in the City that is out of compliance. Blum asked the Commissioners how they feel about setting a deadline requiring the applicant to bring the lighting into compliance. Johnson said he thinks deadlines are good. Baker asked if that would be an ordinance change. Blum said no, it would just be a deadline for bringing the lighting into compliance that is tied to the approval of the PUD Amendment. Baker said he likes the idea, but not necessarily with this proposal. Angell agreed that the idea of deadlines should be talked about further at a later date. He added that it is rare that a dealership is willing to give up impervious surface plus with the additional landscaping a benefit is being provided. Segelbaum agreed that the idea of setting deadlines should be further discussed in the future, but not for this proposal. MOVED by Blum, seconded by Angell and motion carried unanimously to recommend approval of the Major PUD Amendment plan for The Luther Company PUD No. 91, subject to following findings and conditions: Findings: 1. The modifications do not negatively impact the overall quality of the site. 2. The proposal does not significantly impact desirable portions of the site's characteristics. It does remove an impervious area and provides a better opportunity to positively impact infiltration and stormwater quality. 3. The proposed amendment would utilize land efficiently by allowing for the improvement of an established business in an existing building. 4. The use being proposed remains consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan which calls for the preservation and expansion of facilities housing major employers. 5. The PUD amendment would not impact the general health, safety, or welfare of the people of the City. 6. The proposed modification does not conflict with the standards applied to the existing PUD and does not invalidate the Intent and Purpose provision of the City Code. Conditions: 1. All vehicle deliveries shall take place on-site and shall not take place on the street. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission May 30, 2018 Page 4 2. The applicant shall submit a landscaping plan that meets the approval of staff and City Council. Informal Public Hearing — Gener Land Use Map Amendment— 5530-5540 Golden Valley Road and 1530 W come Avenue North — CPAM-68 licant: Watermark Senior ing Community of Golden Valley, LLC Add s: 5530-5540 Golden alley Road and 1530 Welcome ue North Purpose: To change the desi nation on the General Lan. se Map from Low Density Residentia o Medium-High Density sidential 4. Informal Publ Hearing — Prop y Rezoning — 553 540 Golden Valley Road and 1530 Welc a Avenue No ZO11-17 i Applicant: Wat ark Senior iving Comm ity of Golden Valley, LLC Address: 5530-5 Golde *'Valley f ad and 1530 Welcome Avenue North Purpose: To rezone t pro 'erty,, om Commercial and Single Family (R-1) Residential to e iu,_, ensity (R-3) Residential Items 3 and 4 were presented and di ssed to Zimmerman referre a stated that the Comprehensive Plan guides all r ow Densi esidenti uses and that two of the properties are zoned Single Family Residential an ne is.toned mmercial. Zimmerman explained th pplicant, 'proposal amend the General Land Use map to guide the properties fro Low Densit Residenti se to Medium-High Density Residential use and t mend the Zo ing Map to r one the properties from Commercial and Single Family Q. `1) Residential uses to Medium ensity (R-3) Residential use. He stated that all thre I roperties were purchased by W rmark Senior Living Community of Golden Valley w} ' the intent to constfuct a senior care, cility. r Zimmerman sted that the Planning Commission should examining the appropriate ss of the land use and Toning changes and n ; the detail of any specific project wh' could be submitted in tl� future. He added tha 4ome concepts have been shared w' staff and the neighborhood, but the important thingktp thingfocus on is what this land us and zoning could accommo0ate which could be senior i' ng or it could be somet ng else. Zim erman explained that the Medi�m-High Density land use could a ommodate re ential uses (townhomes, apartnents, condominiums, etc.) at dens ` s of up to 20 u is per acre. He stated that the Mium Density (R-3) zoning category ould allow: using at densities of up to 10 unit per acre and up to 4 stories in heigh error or 2 Introduction On behalf of the Luther Company, LLLP Landform is pleased to submit this application for a PUD Amendment for Jaguar Land Rover at 8905 Wayzata Boulevard. We are excited about the improvements proposed for this site. PUD Conditional Use Amendment Luther Company, LLLP is updating and expanding their building to accommodate their growing business. To make room for the building expansion, Luther is proposing to slightly re-configure the display areas at the front entrance of the Jaguar-Land Rover and the display area on the western boundary of the property. Improvements for the site are limited to the 5.13-acre Jaguar-Land Rover Dealership lot. However, the site was approved as part of a planned unit development conditional use permit that includes the adjacent 7.98-acre Toyota dealership. Luther will not be changing any elements located on the Toyota dealership site. The existing dealership has a row of display parking stalls located behind the dealership's monument sign. Luther is proposing to modify the layout of these parking stalls, resulting in the loss of some curbing and open space. However, as part of the improvements the existing hardscaped display area on the west side of the property will be removed and landscaped. The changes to the display area will increase the number of parking stalls by six spaces and increase the open space by 2,023 sq. ft. There are no other changes proposed to the site. Section 11.55 of the City's Zoning Ordinance requires a major PUD Amendment when the building changes location or when the site layout is altered. The proposed plan and amendment does not alter the intent or purpose of the development and is consistent with the purpose of the PUD District, as described in Section 11.55, Subdivision of the City's Zoning Ordinance. According to Section 11.80 G of the Zoning Ordinance, the City's Planning Commission must make 11 findings to approve a conditional use permit. Our plans meet these findings as follows: 1. Demonstrated need for the proposed use. Luther is required by the car manufacturer to meet certain design standards and to update their buildings accordingly. Their building must be improved to meet the manufacturers standards, which requires modifications to the approved PUD plans. 2. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan of the City. The proposed improvements are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan of the City which has guided this site for commercial uses. BAA15042 L A N D F O R M A-,r,127. 201 Project Narrative 3. Effect upon property values in the neighboring area. The proposed improvements will make the site more attractive and will not have any effect on the neighboring area. 4. Effect of any anticipated traffic generation upon the current traffic flow and congestion in the area. The modifications to the building and grounds will not have any impact on the traffic generation, traffic flow or generate congestion in the area. These improvements are simply updating the site to ensure consistency with national brand standards. 5. Effect of any increases in population and density upon surrounding land uses. There will not be any increase in population or density as a result of the proposed improvements. 6. Compliance with the City's Mixed- Income Housing Policy(if applicable to the proposed use.) Not applicable. 7. Increase in noise levels to be caused by the proposed use. There will be no increase in noise levels caused by the improvements. 8. Any odors, dust smoke, gas, or vibration to be caused by the proposed use. No odors, dust, smoke, gas, or vibration will result from the site or building improvements. 9. Any increase in flies, rats, or other animals or vermin in the area to be caused by the proposed use. There will not be any increase in flies, rats, or other animals or vermin resulting from the proposed improvements. 10. Visual appearance of any proposed structure or use. The proposed improvements will bring the building into compliance with the car manufacturer's brand standards. The building's improvements will be high quality design and emphasizes an attractive entrance for Jaguar Land Rover customers. 11. Any other effect upon the general public health, safety, and welfare of the City and its residents. There will not be any other effect upon the general public health, safety, and welfare of the City and its residents. BAA15042 L A N D F 0 R M April 27,2018 Project Narrative 3 Summary We respectfully request approval of the PUD Amendment to allow a building expansion and improvements to the display areas of the Luther Jaguar Land Rover at 8905 Wayzata Boulevard. We look forward to presenting our plans at the May 30, 2018 Planning Commission meeting and the June 19, 2018 City Council Meeting. Contact Information This document was prepared by: Mary Matze Landform 105 South Fifth Avenue, Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Any additional questions regarding this application can be directed to Mary Matze at mmatze@landform.net or 612.638.0227. BAA15042 L A N D F O R M April 27,2018 Project Narrative 4 �¢ Z ¢A JJ E• $$go N LU q3 ��`J �+ w a5�gggg�y9ppg ;€ � � a�5•Jill wo z Q \ o � J 7 0 *ea2aa ,F • r ) CN ¢ri ? w3d go ® Q - W Z � j W z g w � Qry f� W O n � E •� -, , f7 t t, a a & UL,'F o.+mI Ell El . I d i* � 00 • • ® �Qi g�- ezg � � g '�,. � �9d��s��l$��a��@��v4€F#000a��do�g:oos"soorP��''s•3a9�5�9�6au��$��iw�i�K$�v�fl��.p��:�E�»>��>`°`Y�+tsep � 1 Z2 Lp s o U zE W y 3; a .o ► a g gpp v 9 g t�� N Q • Z d € i � r Z � 38�C:�95� s � ttF a F Q • 4 i o m J 7 0 F aaaaa as a U •. ! 8 a ggr ( HNOOHt -- — ---- 1 • sasa. -- - -- y i ( --------------- -------------- ------------ -ZZ— �- )I .,-fib i6 — z- - j --r•' '�FI nl- I ' ^ L------------------- I • g , � w 'I e , ' :r� �L'^°ea�ritq•;` til II b 6 e I 3$ sa I I '. I � I --— --------------- a j — --- — ———— — c j'ge ---� I Its I f , n. z , I � I Fey -Ia! Al ---- r @ - Ma 1 j1 O I I --- -------- �� life Ir _ I has' ------------------ ———— -- I -- � I , o R t 1 I I I I, ao•ear a.aa�as ox —nw.w: - -_— I I {• 1 / - .i 1 1,«wemum® Z y d Q A -r' a LU Via Doz J 7� §aeaaa ai U • 5 � • y9 lag 06 p 111 lilt !ql 8J! R Ill gill i o �g � a slit ;t � � 5 LLJ a •. _ � � e o r 0 Q a � z 0 a.0 n xwu•ir tt„w q � �� a \ I _ I I I I , 1 o .0 w I --- S 'i L1- FAV Q O`\ YMu \-- ` �— I =(Oz IM V l7 �Do I f4 IN om I lu it m I J � ___—-- —— I \ Eo Ld ., I ----------------- -, : I I I � I I i I to - ! " I at— I I > to m OD I w ' 1 rflm� I N�wJul 'i a�Da I C� rpv I --1--- - I Ilu i 1 37 I - 0 Ir 80'600 - 60, II d 3 „22,9So ON 2 ---T--- I' O'LLKA '?13d �l1N3/1y O � 6 I I � OVId 031VOV� ?130 'LLICa ,I nl I n ., w I } F A y s J Z. $$g LU v� Q 3 `-"� QN 0 6L ��1 Q ftpe a i 7j �' �i m c ► 9RkkQp y 17 • Z E 36RBiS # � a 6 i W 4 6 �W 3 �y o �0 7 tl � � 4 g� � � o o � • � • yygy gg pgpy}( gg ¢5 yg y . g ppd � I I I 0 r \ I L y_ � I 1 1 jI r < _ w------------- I I ® 4 �'' co I Q / 110 - - `; �tr,cr r , I LL ---- ` G F-----------�---- ---t-- — I I I I / I --------------- WI i i 10lu -- �I —= Z 6A 0 i sA� orgy s a€ �VJy $ N as Z € g _ _ > J U' a ed dti15 n c U • .� s s g iN qj 1, all 9!2 1 .1 1 0 z gig - iso s �yy6 ilt 9 fig gg� - �Sa q$ 5� �pW;a39 - 4 $ all$ Ell ai3q � ga y q 3` 4 g g� �€- •• ' F � a 2HS. � � A� q- v �ai^it ��R�^E� C��i1 �o � oil d g44 � �wr�A�3 csu _ i rta�rrrrir�r rtttrtrrrr_urr_r_rr tw y ap _ � ��✓ � � V � t��ttttr f/ ® ' i It j V Z Q 'n N tY � aE l W gk clV A' iaL E�3 5 y O O gg ! ® O w p �.. �CO m�a A� ' V x w II .._�: LU ES pt w ---------------- LL o Q 70" c � q < no o N1 Im >R i0 �� a -art "N fij n '•• v � L�- RR_t'RTflttRititrTt j `O 3 a ODzzw Inn n co to LO 21 11 It 11 Vl OC_wu_ RT ...-..�..��......r...- ...-• t 1 Ow[W u! U of -.s ¢\ C1 W Z 09 j v • 10l 3 Ue Z2 Q ori 1 v QRF3 11 00 H hill dooafR .d # Of N gR YYpv a ' �@ U Z Q 56881 & eY N< • < A 4 i es 09. € w III=III _ a LL o i � a 3l — \ \ ®® g YN 6 bi m 1! Z o F Y rn ygo� d QFC pQp yy��.. m �, 6 co w LLJ 6 I gill L L 0 fi9' iL m ITI b jig g e9 s � UIII�I' 11=III- _ ` : cn w ry ca CL I I_ 52 CL I.L _ J � CL III�LL m � w CL Ma WEI �® z IIIIIIIIIII' � na-cD 5 � W � e > > Qw o m QQD J (7 lldaca e, 0 a o � � aro _ $ IE .. w C vlg8 � 8 A LL O w Y Y5 • 5q&g®• 11111" �01 il Auj Sr7 .—__ I cr I J {` J G C] J 10 CO ,I(ITIfII Z W Q c WJ A s 0 g JY^WE 10 ev �Z1 ;i.YYS ��1YYY •Y`,l\ti`:� �:Y�S9 � a.�:i.\ti a O I p I _ I Z X00 t -------------------- vz ®� r�� ---- - x---- 1 m-- at Z M W — W Z a co H... `J I � c ;G ° 09 I I I J a I 3 I OL19"o '000 '?Iad anN3Av — OV1d 031V0VA ?IMO 'LWga 1 mnn ,, --- ------- n°r°oimmm G 7 F ! n a ,�k .a y 134ge 6 -1 tfN Im C`J ti i i i i i i 5 SINo : �o Jo 110 ;p =0 IN _ SIo � o a #0 C jig IN ;o ]Io i . . — !� a IN l ' ---------------- -F— --------------- t�•i m I— i!t t C 04 E f `� .�—. u4 it 3IEl P A: '. `u r1 vq 1 d+' ky v,$Hill MIT at L. I r yg I d II + rI VI r!J 0 I U w w' r — a !i ° t ":fir 9• JAY I ,I ' r v.f m' I, I• Nom - d` k T .+ 2z w > a o 00 ou i L sl CD --------------- --------------------7 LLJ CL 0 L- CL — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - • L .. w • CL > w CIO 0 J gqg[ �jroyso OSCD X .� Z�p €� �b J sli� >' z � q�q �' g • 10 L11 • • ® ry rc < 2 a. - 1 y`-- 1 1 - 1 \ 1 ! 1 1 � 1 1 � K3 1 C1 1 I � _ C 1 $% iL 1 'a 1 ; - I � G I. • • IM, m rr � ;dO r r r r rr r r q + •00 O0O O Om m OC d d d d OC d d d d _ 1 N = N N N I V N Ul N V V U • zQ o za a a ? za a I 1 ar a� i aV cs v zd aV �, v 0 1 �+ �_^ m Cr dN a m m d76 7! i! dN _ N 1 x� 0# # 3 3 3 ww 3 3 3 w I �.,�4R • N3 3 3 �� = I • X x x w N N - • _ �" x x x �x x x x o�x x x # N N N a N N N N 7 N N N - I 1 a o N Qf w 1 I • w � 1 d w w LL w 1 d r N a m Q 1 1 w o Z j LL a w > Q \ ULU of r Z >z Of 40 0 1 a 1 OC d 03 J \ Q lu w W z i a J of \ a o N o V W w O J .. . a dp m Q\ U IT a r O Q J d m Q N d ; '�' N Z Z \ Z U Q O N Z a \ \ QoQ o ? zo z z Q zg �^ \ y Q d L Q \ Z Q Q N �L N I 3 1 03 a �U a z �r U zmow, N a z U czn w o U a Z Qo z W U d ^_� 1 0 0 o f x luz a d a a m w Q N N N Vl Q r d Z N U Z S m d Z- J J J Z N X 15 6 43 Z N V J L w W Z z d u OC OC Z Z O Q J a o o d o d = ~w w w w Q a a =LLQ " a U - m M L L r J O O ° I 1 r Bio ��' -. .... ,.. w 1 m� d d mei oC N > m2 S S S U � N N �_ NN N � �, N N N M v N N N _ H 1 ° 1 wuni w d �a v a Q aU V d au O w � 1 mw i 1 s 1 1 ----- L, --:�---��----�� ° — --- 1 1 � 1 1 1 1 LL ax 1 3� 1 � 1 1 x� m" 1 1 7 o _ 1 � � o I • 09 J0d '-Ca jnN�/ � �► QO > 'D 00 c • 75 • UJ cn Q • � o ' a) � • i' -� • -� OCIO Q 40 • aCL - A 1 Yi 0— C • •• • VJ O • • 1 (n Cf) cc Ca � (n (n • _ a ° L L c _ W 0- a_ ' o • 1 • I CQ Q. • O 09 LL 9 17C SOC Jed -3nN-3AV �— Zoo i co — # , .. r r WP y �7� 4' LU JLr tt CL MCI Lill � �s7 �x:,a r _ • r � Y t' y; �t A l� t !I .1 t , � , t ot �J fir' Or w- 0 Am"in a t j • Z,y1 Yi v. '� '�'�r,1 � I >� w ��nM '°�4 i �e I • 1, K>* a v • a o Inti � •�;� � .Q -.L-. �~-'�'+ �,� �.,.�y' ^� _ p "O CD cu �e- .S.{;�0` I I C w ca •C R :� .�*'�'. •` C Q N M C OO r ' Q p Q-0 a) c6 N > t N Q � c cu 0 O — U C .0 ' t. L C (n c� �- cvcn a t R O C E T Ucu E C O CV cu L a) 7 '� W Q3 M O N . O X Cn 2 U m " 7f1,».'�' �` + �y." QX U_ J m o cc QOM t 1 a) c } C c CU 0 p N T O O N O U i � — ?i C Q L= cE N _ Q) N mt - Q C E CU u> CL E .. :;._ o C_ � N .S 0 EO -p a> Cc COa V N '' J O A N Z3 X X lL J m O � J- �. ;,,}' _• ,fig'. O 0 co t.� w�\ �.i,,• � N O � C cu i•- v cu = ,� C = cn O _ ca y N O L 1 N a) " m cn _ c O O U a) CL 0 cu OO N Q) _....w cB M (6 CU L a) Q) c _ 'r •� 4 Co • • s y Pik O cri ov CL M R h a) E �. CQ W -JA ?. #�'0c'd' r { a� t 40 y' �. '•' t ti ca � L or CU s ` iG' 4r O c6 Q cu cu Q -0 �, 4 z a) 0) C � t' E •V a) U r'r co -0 '� U O CD cya o X o 30cu 0 `C c D m o t • — = LL J U m N ...w , Cu i X �� o • � Z 2 Lo N O d .w cz '( L O U E N lhn: U 2 is a) � r= ! (6 (ny �1'a cu >+ y a) L 4 Q a) C_ U) r 'Lr +. m U (Q i C C O ar V CL m U) L .ska!�•� C/) cu C0 Q N e . cts mc : O p n+t O c t cn -E CDL In X Z C C v) X LL Z CO aa)i m � � o Rudy Luther Toyota Campus P.U.D. No. 91 Original City Council Approval: May 15, 2001 City Council Approval Amendment #1: June 21, 2005 City Council Approval Amendment #2: September 4, 2007 City Council Approval Amendment #3: May 19, 2015 City Council Approval Amendment #4: June 19, 2018 City of Golden Valley, Minnesota Use Permit for Planned Unit Development Project Name: RLT Second Addition P.U.D. No. 91 Location: 8805 and 8905 Wayzata Blvd. Legal Description: RLT Second Addition P.U.D. No. 91 Applicant: The Luther Company, LLLP Address: 3701 Alabama Ave S, St. Louis Park, MN 55416 Owner: The Luther Company, LLLP Address: 3701 Alabama Ave S, St. Louis Park, MN 55416 Zoning District: Commercial Permitted Uses: Auto Dealership (new and used car sales) with indoor and outdoor display and auto service. Components: A. Land Use 1. The Final Plan of Development plans (17 sheets) prepared by Baker Associates dated April 22, 2005, shall be made a part of this PUD Permit. 2. Permitted uses shall include auto sales and auto service with outdoor display and indoor sales floor. 3. Allowed uses for the two buildings on the site shall be for auto sales and service. Uses other than specified above shall not be allowed except by amendment of the PUD permit. 4. The uses on the site shall meet all applicable City, State and Federal standards, rules and law. 5. Amendment #2 allows for an additional car wash bay to be constructed at 8805 Wayzata Boulevard per the plans prepared by Baker Associates dated August 13, 2007. 6. Amendment #3 allows for the construction of an approximately 2,380 square foot addition to the east side of the existing Jaguar Land Rover Building per the plans prepared by Baker Associates dated April 14, 2015. 7. Amendment #4 allows for the expansion of the existing building by approximately 5,000 square feet and the reconfiguration of the display and parking areas at the front entrance of the Jaguar Land Rover dealership per the plans prepared by Baker Associates dated April 27, 2018. B. Appearance 1. The Final Plan of Development plans include the landscape plan that is a part of this PUD permit. This plan is subject to review of the Building Board of Review and any additional revisions required by that Board. This Board shall also establish the amount of a performance bond to be posted by the applicant to insure the performance of the landscape material. 2. The floor plans and building elevations are a part of the Final Plan of Development plans. Any new construction shall be consistent with those plans. 3. There shall be no exterior public address system for any uses on the site. 4. The Final Plan of Development plans dated April 22, 2005, regarding lightning are made a part of this permit. 5. The existing cellular tower on the site may remain. 6. At the time of permitting staff shall work with the applicant to implement the landscaping plan prepared by LANDFORM and dated June 13 2018. C. Construction 1. The construction shall be subject to all requirements of the City regarding the issuance of building and construction permits. D. Utilities and Grading 1. The recommendations in the memo from Jeff Oliver, PE, City Engineer to Mark Grimes, Director of Planning and Development dated May 9, 2005, shall become a part of this permit. 2. The Final Plan of Development plans dated April 22, 2005, regarding grading and utilities are made a part of this permit. E. Circulation Component: 1. Access drives, parking and vehicle display areas shall be constructed per the site plan prepared by Baker Associates dated April 22, 2005. 2. All vehicle deliveries shall take place on-site and shall not take place on the street G. Subdivision 1. The name of the final plat shall be "RLT Second Addition P.U.D. No. 91" It is hereby understood and agreed that this Use Permit is a part of the City Council approval granted on May 15, 2001, June 21, 2005, September 4, 2007, May 19, 2015, and June 19, 2018. Any changes to the RLT Second Addition P.U.D. No. 91 shall require an amendment. THE LUTHER COMPANY LLLP Witness: By.- Title: y;Title: Date: CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY Witness: By; Shepard M. Harris, Mayor Date.- Witness- ate:Witness: By: Timothy J. Cruikshank, City Manager Date: Warning: This permit does not exempt you from all other City Code provisions, regulations and ordinances. ORDINANCE NO. 640, 2ND SERIES AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE Approval of Major PUD Amendment Plan RLT Second Addition P.U.D. No. 91, Amendment #4 The Luther Company, LLLP, Applicant The City Council for the City of Golden Valley hereby ordains as follows: Section 1. City Code Chapter 11 entitled “Land Use Regulations (Zoning)” is amended in Section 11.10, Subd. 2, and Section 11.55, by approving a Major PUD Amendment Plan to Planned Unit Development (P.U.D.) 91 thereby allowing the expansion of the existing building and reconfiguration of the display and parking areas at the front entrance of the Jaguar Land Rover dealership. This PUD is subject to all of the terms of the permit to be issued including, but not limited to the following specific conditions: 1. All vehicle deliveries shall take place on-site and shall not take place on the street. 2. At the time of permitting, staff shall work with the applicant to implement the landscaping plan prepared by LANDFORM and dated June 13, 2018. In addition the Council makes the following findings pursuant to City Code Section 11.55, Subd. 6(Q): 1. The modifications do not negatively impact the overall quality of the site. 2. The proposal does not significantly impact desirable portions of the site’s characteristics. It does remove an impervious area and provides a better opportunity to positively impact infiltration and stormwater quality. 3. The proposed amendment would utilize land efficiently by allowing for the improvement of an established business in an existing building. 4. The use being proposed remains consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan which calls for the preservation and expansion of facilities housing major employers. 5. The PUD amendment would not impact the general health, safety, or welfare of the people of the City. 6. The proposed modification does not conflict with the standards applied to the existing PUD and does not invalidate the Intent and Purpose provision of the City Code. Section 2. The tracts of land affected by this ordinance is legally described as follows: RLT Addition PUD No. 91 Section 3. City Code Chapter 1 entitled “General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation” and Sec. 11.99 entitled “Violation a Misdemeanor” are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Ordinance No. 640 -2- June 19, 2018 Section 4. This ordinance shall take effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law. Adopted by the City Council this 19th day of June, 2018. /s/Shepard M. Harris Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: /s/Kristine A. Luedke Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting June 19, 2018 60 day deadline: June 26, 2018 Agenda Item 4. F. Public Hearing - Amendment to the General Land Use Plan Map - 2429 Douglas Drive Prepared By Amy Morgan, Planning Intern Summary An application to amend the Comprehensive Plan was filed by the owner of the property at 2429 Douglas Drive. Retro Companies, Inc., represented by Todd Ofsthun of TCO Design, is proposing that the property be reguided from Low Density Residential use to Medium-Low Density Residential use in the Comprehensive Plan. General Land Use Plan Map Amendment 2429 Douglas Drive is roughly one-half acre in size. It is bounded by Low Density Residential uses to the north, the Sandburg Athletic Fields to the west and south, and Douglas Drive to the west. The City owns a vacant parcel directly to the south of the subject property. The property was purchased by Retro Companies, Inc., in 2017 after a lightning strike and fire damaged a single-family home. The home was demolished in recent months. Reguiding 2429 Douglas Drive for Medium-Low Density Residential use would allow for increased residential density along the Douglas Drive corridor, consistent with the recommendations of the Douglas Drive Corridor Study conducted in 2009. This property—2429 Douglas Drive—and adjacent properties have been guided for Medium-Low Density Residential use in the City’s draft 2040 Comprehensive Plan. A Zoning Map Amendment has also been filed for this property to rezone it for Moderate Density (R-2) Residential. The Planning Commission reviewed the proposal on May 30, 2018, and recommended approval (7-0). Approval of a General Land Use Plan Map amendment requires an affirmative vote by 2/3 of members of the City Council. Any proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment must be sent to the Metropolitan Council for review and comment. Attachments • Location Map (1 page) • Memo to the Planning Commission dated May 30, 2018 (2 pages) • Planning Commission Minutes dated May 30, 2018 (3 pages) • Applicant’s Narrative (3 pages) • Comprehensive Plan Table of Land Use Definitions (1 page) • General Land Use Plan Map (1 page) • 2040 Draft Future Land Use Map (1 page) • Resolution for Amendment to the General Land Use Plan Map for 2429 Douglas Drive, reguiding from Low Density Residential use to Medium-Low Density Residential use (1 page) Recommended Action Motion to adopt Resolution for Amendment to the General Land Use Plan Map for 2429 Douglas Drive, reguiding from Low Density Residential use to Medium-Low Density Residential use. 70 Medicine Lake Rd 6531 6525 6509 6435 6409 6339 2565 2560 a 2540 2530 2545 6040 r 251 2527 t C 6060 u 2525 2520 2515 2511 6056 Subject Property 2465 S'%I 2505 25,6 g .9L� w 2465 2501 2502 2501 2455 CD 2455 200 2445 a G� 2429 00 a 6127 205 saiwbul J 2417 6117 Athlefx 2425 6107 2400 Fachly 2410 2415 2400 6150 6130 6120 6110 6140 City of 001de F, F.` AA0 ,R.!' ANDU M vallelt Physical Development Department 763-593-8095/763-593-8109 (fax) Date: May 30, 2018 To: Golden Valley Planning Commission From: Amy Morgan, Planning Intern Subject: Informal Public Hearing—General Land Use Map Amendment—2429 Douglas Drive —Todd Ofsthun, TCO Design, Applicant Summary An application to amend the Comprehensive Plan was filed by the owner of the property at 2429 Douglas Drive. Retro Companies, Inc., represented by Todd Ofsthun of TCO Design, is proposing that the property be guided for Medium-Low Density Residential use in the Comprehensive Plan. The property is currently guided for Low Density Residential use. The applicant has also separately requested a Zoning Map Amendment to rezone the property to Moderate Density (R-2) Residential use in order to be consistent with the proposed amendment to the Comprehensive Plan. Background 2429 Douglas Drive is roughly one-half acre in size. It is bounded by Low Density Residential uses to the north, the Sandburg Athletic Fields to the west and south, and Douglas Drive to the west. The City owns a vacant parcel directly to the south of the subject property. The property was purchased by Retro Companies, Inc., in 2017 after a lightning strike and fire damaged a single-family home. The home was demolished in recent months. A neighborhood meeting was held at Golden Valley City Hall on Wednesday, May 16. Two members of the public attended and discussed the proposal for a small transitional care facility at this location. There were questions raised regarding traffic, parking, and disruption from construction. Evaluation While staff understands the applicant's intention is to submit an application for a transitional care facility in the near future, at this time the City is only being asked to consider an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan and a corresponding Zoning Map amendment. The land use that is being proposed would accommodate the planned facility, but it would also continue to allow the construction of a single-family home. Residential facilities serving between seven and 25 persons which are licensed by the State of Minnesota are allowed to operate in an R-2 district with a Conditional Use Permit. City staff is recommending that the property be guided for Medium-Low Density Residential use since it will allow for increased residential density along the Douglas Drive corridor, consistent with the recommendations of the Douglas Drive Corridor Study conducted in 2009. This property-2429 Douglas Drive—and adjacent properties have been guided for Medium-Low Density Residential use in the City's draft 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Additional review of the contemplated transitional care facility would be conducted at the time of application. Conditions to mitigate any potential impacts on the surrounding neighborhood would be considered as part of the public process. Any proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment must be sent to the Metropolitan Council for their review and approval. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of amending the General Land Use Map to guide the property at 2429 Douglas Drive from Low Density Residential use to Medium-Low Density Residential use. Attachments Location Map (1 page) Narrative (3 pages) Comprehensive Plan Table of Land Use Definitions (1 page) General Land Use Map (1 page) 2040 Draft Future Land Use Map (1 page) Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission May 30, 2018 Page 14 egelbaum said they have to consider w t they believe is best for Golden Valley and th has been determined that locatio that are appropriate for single family es should as is and areas that should upport other types of businesse d be guided that a said he thinks R-3 is o large for this location w e considers the impact to the nei_g%4Lhood. Pockl said she thinks leavin propertias they ar akes the most sense in order to keep the character of the neigh b d a tis cugently. Baker said the concerns they've discuss im to conclude that he also opposes the proposals. t MOVED by Blum, seconded egelbau and motion carr unanimously to recommend denial of cha g the design on of 5535-5540 G Valley Road and 1530 Welcome Aven orth on the Gene I Land Use Map from L ensity Residential to Me -High Density Resid tial. MOVED b m, seconded by Angell and otion carried unanimously to recomm denial o zoning the properties at 5530-5 0 Golden Valley Road and 1530 Welcome Ave North from Commercial and Single amity (R-1) Residential to Medium Density ( Residential. 5. Informal Public Hearing — General Land Use Map Amendment— 2429 Douglas Drive North — CPAM-69 Applicant: Retro Companies, Inc. Address: 2429 Douglas Drive North Purpose: To change the designation on the General Land Use Map from Low Density Residential to Medium-Low Density Residential 6. Informal Public Hearing — Property Rezoning — 2429 Douglas Drive North — Z014-08 Applicant: Retro Companies, Inc. Address: 2429 Douglas Drive North Purpose: To rezone the property from Single Family (R-1) Residential to Moderate Density (R-2) Residential Items 5 and 6 were presented and discussed together. Morgan referred to a location map of the property and explained that this property had a single family home on it, however it was struck by lightning and damaged by fire in 2017 Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission May 30, 2018 Page 15 and was recently purchased and demolished by the applicant. She stated that staff anticipates a proposal for a small transitional care facility at this location in the near future and at this time the applicant is proposing to amend the General Land Use map to guide the property from Low Density Residential to Medium-Low Density Residential and to amend the Zoning Map to rezone the property from Single Family (R-1) Residential to Moderate Density (R-2) Residential. Morgan explained that re-guiding and rezoning this property will allow for increased residential density along the Douglas Drive corridor. The permitted uses would allow for small lot single family homes and a residential facility would be allowed with a Conditional Use Permit. She stated that this proposal is consistent with the recommendations in the Douglas Drive Corridor Study conducted in 2009 and is also consistent with the draft 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Morgan stated that a neighborhood meeting was held on May 16 and that two residents attended the meeting and discussed the proposal for a small transitional care facility at this location. She noted that the questions raised at the neighborhood meeting were in regard to traffic, parking, and disruption from construction. Morgan stated that staff is recommending approval of the proposed Land Use Map and Zoning Map amendments. Todd Ofsthun, TCO Design, representing the applicant, stated that guiding this property to medium-low density and rezoning it to R-2 will fit their purposes for a small transitional care facility. Segelbaum asked what transitional care means. Ofsthun stated that it is assisted living before a memory care facility for example. Baker opened the public hearing. Seeing and hearing no one wishing to comment, Baker closed the public hearing. Baker noted that the proposed new Comp Plan guides this property Medium-Low Density. Angell asked if doing this proposal now allows them to do construction sooner. Zimmerman said that is correct. He added that if the applicant waited until the updated Comp Plan is approved it would add another year to the construction schedule. Johnson said he is supportive of both these applications. He questioned what the City will do with the vacant lot it owns to south. Zimmerman said there have been discussions regarding that property and that it is guided in the Comp Plan for Medium-Low Density as well. Blum referred to the history of the area and said this proposal goes to the understanding that this is an appropriate guiding for this property. Baker and Segelbaum agreed. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission May 30, 2018 Page 16 MOVED by Johnson, seconded by Pockl and motion carried unanimously to recommend approval of changing the designation of 2429 Douglas Drive North on the General Land Use Map from Low Density Residential to Medium-Low Density Residential. MOVED by Brookins, seconded by Johnson and motion carried unanimously to recommend approval of rezoning the property at 2429 Douglas Drive North from Single Family (R-1) Residential to Moderate Density (R-2) Residential. Informal Public Hearing — Min Subdivision — 7040 Glenwood Avenue — Marie Estates — SU17-16 plicant: Peter Knaeble Ad ss: 7040 Glenwood venue Purpos To reconfigure t existing single family reseential lot into two new single family re ential lots. Morgan reminded Commission t t a proposal re ` ing dividing this property into three lots was heard he March 2 Planning Cossion meeting. She stated that the original proposal has b withdraw and that a w application has been submitted to demolish the existing sing amily h e and divide the property into two new single family residential lots. She st d th ' ',the dr way access would be moved from Glenwood Avenue to the High 5 Fro ge Road and that land would be dedicated for a potential future cul-de-sac an hway 55 Frontage Road. Morgan referred to the subdivision rements and stated that the minimum lot size in this case is 10,000 square feet. For i 'te r lot a lot width of 80 feet must be maintained at the front setback line to a dep of 7 feet, nd the corner lot must maintain 100 feet of width at the front setback lin o a d th of feet as well. Morgan showed the Co issioner ''an illustrate of the existing conditions and of the lots after the proposed su vision and ated that the posed new lots meet the square footage and lot widt equirements. he noted that dtification letter was sent to property owners within 500 et and that no responses were red ed and that a tree survey has been completed., Morgan disc ed the eight condition's for approval or denial o`` Minor Subdivision listed in City Code said that staff is recor;mending approval of this posed subdivision as the proposal es meet all the Code reg4jrements. Black id he noticed that there are 12 properties in the area and askAk if this property bord s those. Morgan stated that the a are R-2 properties across GlenW'I d Avenue. S elbaum noted that one of the coni 'jtions for approval or denial of a subdiv 'on is that sements are granted for necessary ublic purposes. He questioned if the po tial future ul-de-sac will be an easement or if the property owner will be ceding the land to City. SCD Des VV %00 9330 Thomas Avenue North, Brooklyn Park, MN 55444 Office 763-424-3676 cell 952-994-8276 todd@tcodesign.net April 27, 2018 Re:Zoning Map Amendments And General Land Use Map Amendment Applications 2429 Douglas Drive North Golden Valley, MN 55422 City of Golden Valley Planning Department 7800 Golden Valley Road Golden Valley, MN 55427 Retro Companies Inc. Comprehensive Care Facility — Project Narrative Background This property had a fire damaged house when Retro Companies Inc. came across it and determined it would be a nice quiet location for their project. The proposed project is an assisted living and transitional care facility with approximately 11,700 SF containing approximately 22 senior and transitional care units. The proposed structure will be two stories. The project will be located at 2429 Douglas Drive North. The existing fire damaged house has already been removed by Retro Companies, Inc. The property has Douglas Drive North to the East. The new facility will be accessed with a curb cut from Douglas Drive North. There are several advantages to a residential care facility for this neighborhood. It is important to the owner and operators that this facility is well maintained and run. All aspects of site and building maintenance will be kept to high standards. The families and groups associated with Comprehensive Care have high standards for this type of facility and for their patients. They are caring family members, medical professionals or business professionals. These types of facilities are quiet and low key. There will be no large and loud parties or gatherings. Its 24 hour a day security will be a nice buffer from the busy Douglas Drive area. The maximum number of employees when the facility is full will be 7. This is the number of employee required by the State for this type of facility and care. This is also the number that a management company needs to provide the patients with meals, personal hygiene, housekeeping and any other patient needs. Building and exterior maintenance will be out sourced. There is plenty of on-site snow storage space. The City requires 5 off street parking spaces for this type of facility with this number of beds. We are providing 12 off street spaces. Zoning and Land Use 2429 Douglas Drive North is currently guided and zoned Single-Family R-1 Residential. Retro Companies, Inc. would like to re-guide and re-zone this property to Moderate Density R-2 Residential. This requires Zoning Map Amendment and General Land Use Map Amendment applications. The property is approximately 0.58 acres. The Comprehensive Care Facility will be the sole principal structure on the property. A conditional use permit will be required to allow the assisted living use on the new R-2 zoning. Buildin The proposed building will consist of two floors of assisted senior living and transitional care units. There will be 8 care units on the first floor along with a generous gathering/dining space. The second will have 14 care units along with a small sitting area. There will be a total of 22 care units. An elevator will be provided in the main dining area. The residents will get assisted living care, memory care and transitional care. Transitional care being patients that need 24-hour care, but do not qualify to stay in a hospital or have family or friends that can give them that level of care. Examples would be post-op, pre-op, dialysis, bariatrics, respirator, etc. Transitional care residents are quiet and static. Memory care patients are not allowed to wander outside of the facility without being accompanied by a care team member. The facility will operate under the Minnesota state Comprehensive Care License. The proposed building will use exterior materials consistent with current residential construction. We will use a nice balance of manufactured stone and `LP SmartSide'. The siding will be vary using a combination of textures and colors. Other architectural features such as decorative vents and brackets will be used to add visual interest. The roof will be finished with `shake look' architectural asphalt shingles. Site The overall site is approximately 0.58 acres and the area to be disturbed for the proposed project is roughly 0.35 acres. The site is designed to meet R-2 zoning standards. Setbacks for the property are per the table below. Building Setback Pavement Setback Required Proposed Required Proposed Front/ Douglas 35 Feet 35 Feet 35 Feet 35+ Feet Drive ROW Side Yard /(North 13 Feet 13+ Feet 6.5 Feet 6.5+ Feet and South Rear Yard / 25 Feet 25+ Feet 25 Feet 25+ Feet (West) Access and Parkinq Site access is provided with a curb cut off Douglas Drive North. Parking has been provided to serve the proposed building in adherence to City Code with 12 exterior surface stalls. An accessible stall is provided in front of the building with a curb cut ramp providing access to the main concrete sidewalk. The stalls are 9'x18.5' and adjacent to a concrete sidewalk to account for bumper overhang. Drive aisles are 24' in width. An emergency vehicle turn around was not perceived to be necessary because of the shallow depth and access from Douglas Drive North. Landscapinq and Tree Preservation Landscaping is designed to provide site character and blend into the surrounding existing tree canopy. We plan to preserve existing trees that fall outside of the grading limits and provide 6-0 tall fence screening from abutting residential properties. The project will have a proposed planting schedule which provides ample landscaping and screening for the site. The types (species) of new trees and minimum size specified meets the City ordinance. Grading, Drainage, Utilities and Stormwater Treatment Proposed site grades, drive aisles, parking areas, utilities and stormwater treatment will be addressed by our civil Engineer prior to building permit application. Retro Companies Development Schedule April, 2018—Application to the City of Golden Valley Spring/Summer, 2018—Building Permit Application Fall, 2018— Begin Construction COYKyKerr'.R ArA %wq AwGI I tOVue DeSigw DeOU.ntLOw tO exeeUewee 3-8 Chapter 3: Land Use Tabte 3.2: Definition Of Land Use Categories Residential, Low-Density Single-family detached homes are the predominant low-density residential use, with small clusters of (0.1 to 5 homes per gross two-family attached homes mixed in at scattered locations as appropriate. Other types of residential acre of land area) structures in planned unit developments (PUDs) may also be appropriate as long as the overall density of development falls within the acceptable range. Metro Council equivalent is"single family." Residential, Medium- Medium-density residential uses include two-family attached homes in clusters of more than 10 units, or Density (from 5 to 11.99 townhomes, or other types of housing in PUDs where the average density of development falls within the homes per gross acre of land acceptable range. Metro Council equivalent is part of"multi-family." area) Residential, Medium- Townhomes, apartment buildings, and condominiums are the permitted medium-high-density residential High-Density (12 to 19.9 uses. Other types of housing in PUDs are also appropriate in these areas if they are developed to meet homes per gross acre of land the minimum density threshold. Metro Council equivalent is part of"multi-family." area) Residential, High- Apartment buildings and condominiums are the predominant high-density residential uses. Other types of Density (20 to 30 homes housing in PUDs are also appropriate in these areas if they are developed to meet the minimum density per gross acre of land area) threshold. Metro Council equivalent is part of"multi-family." This limited use category features general office buildings. Medical or laboratory facilities where work is Commercial Office performed in a predominantly office setting are also acceptable uses. Office areas may include mixed-use office/residential PUDs. Metro Council equivalent is part of"commercial." Commercial uses include retail sales/services, restaurants, hotels/motels, and for-profit entertainment/ Commercial Retail/ recreation facilities, as well as anything allowed in an office area.Mixed-use commercial/residential Service PUDs are also a possibility. Metro Council equivalent is "commercial,"except that does NOT classify any residential care facilities as commercial uses. This category includes warehousing and storage, assembly and light manufacturing, truck/van terminals, Light Industrial utility installations, offices, and large-scale specialty retail operations such as lumber yards, greenhous- es, and vehicle sates/rental lots. Metro Council equivalent is part of"industrial." Industrial This category includes anything that could go into a light industrial area, as well as railroad uses, animal care facilities, and heavy manufacturing. Metro Council equivalent is part of"industrial." This category includes a mix of residential, commercial, institutional, and business-oriented land uses. Mixed Use This area was established to encourage a compact urban area that will serve as a gateway to the city. Transit-oriented development is expected to spur high-density development that is encouraged to include a mix of uses.Approximatley 25 percent of this area is expected to include residential development. Open Space(public and These uses include golf courses, ball fields, playgrounds, parks, nature areas, and storm water ponding private) areas. Metro Council equivalent is"parks and recreation,"except the Metro Council does not specify ponding areas or nature areas. Schools and Religious These include education facilities at all levels, the cemetery, places of worship for all denominations, Facilities and miscellaneous religious installations. Metro Council equivalent is part of"public, semi-public." Public Facilities, Administrative or service installations(except those otherwise classified)at all levels of government fall Miscellaneous into this category.Metro Council equivalent is part of"public, semi-public." Semi-Public Facilities, Residential treatment or care facilities, hospitals and surgical centers, private clubs, and other not-for- Miscellaneous profit facilities (except those otherwise classified)fall into this category. Metro Council equivalent is part of"public, semi-public,"except for residential treatment or care. Wetland Properties in this category are generally those listed in the National Wetland Inventory. By definition,all wet- land areas are considered to be"in use."Metro Council equivalent is"wetland development constraint." Floodplain This category includes all areas with a land elevation below the 100-year flood level. By definition, all flood- way areas are considered to be"in use."Metro Council equivalent is"floodplain development constraint." Sweeney/Twin Lake, Wirth Lake, DNR unnamed basin#27-36(in Wirth Park, along the creek north of Open Water Highway 55), and Bassett Creek are classified as open water areas. By definition, all open water is consid- ered to be"in use."Metro Council equivalent is"open water." This category includes all land reserved for street or highway uses and for certain transit facilities, Right-of-Way, Road whether by easement or by fee title. By definition, all such right-of-way is considered to be "in use." Metro Council equivalent is "roadways, option 2." Right-of-Way, Railroad This category includes all land reserved for railroad uses, whether by easement or by fee title. By defini- tion, all such right-of-way is considered to be"in use."There is no Metro Council equivalent. City of • •- • • Plan 2008-2018 J e _ m E •� w rL o o U) U M o e e qa O Q a c ca c S 3 w a3 o O y N 5 § �v C C v q q •� g M 0 ^. Tyr. Q q a y m S. (n l0 u O y y d V C 'V 'U N 'D y •U $ i TA N J�Q J aci e_o °1 v m y a m m to o s .7 C fn H lL iiWii C 3 3 ttd y c o a c o 0- 'a 8 O ami 4) vI 1F m v 0) -0 x n 0 M m S11OdV3NN1W 30 X11D 511-10d V3NNIW 30 A11J - ►! ?e 'M uW OWN � �4 2 d_. U o !� ..max° ®t..d � V6•rx. ' O •pF S110dtl9NNIW 10 X113 �! �r� asmx*wt✓'� k � _ x•n,»•» •,•�k _ 3 .wvx. �,b�^'w•,»n,. �✓ N b`4 31VOSNI99O8 .�'„ t r. " 1 y �Fj x4 S ; r-x " .' ,--. --... •r•• $ �--�� .e°x. _. �,,,w 'ems _,Te ,.;q, .' �.� �'� � ,_ , { .. ;5 .. , a I wx rv,ww •wn � ... P° n •x,xx ° ,x,xx - t x IEtt " not. cc y 9 a„r f , h O .x�r� ' t �x ✓ •��n V a - ..v.x s t ��6�•� d E 'e.� - � •Y �� nbnx r "�, \ `'-\ Y ; E �•roP c' NFOR � �a x•r,x. � x� ��...v w.x u� A h - �” °x 3.. g \� � O M goal, J ., y Y n.• i - i n r °x.n. \ � �w,x�,rr uY O� a I x \\ ' - i �f 4� ' ...xY i _ a •nan \ xr♦°..rx..w ,9 '�� x� °"°x o; i T\ i x • r m ._.._.._._. Y V '♦1 e.x H1nOWA1d 30 A11J °•, ., I xlnowA d xava slno'1•1s ��;x g� 30 A11D do A113 CL U m U9 N � d n L 0 N N y N � > �/, _ C > VI Z N 9) C. tp $ a t C) U m a E m 8 O U 1 N 0 0 0 c d N L• N a N C a J C C N N d J m E at N c m V (D _> >m o m .= d C o o y N y ani a v d -6 m C N > aa) '( rn o n r t a C 4) -j _ LL d o �—�, N a a a v g Q O v o 0 m N a+ '80 n,RaSt C € CL w, ' v ' o RM SI10.1\'-I11\11%X10 A.1.1:) �! `• 91104VE1NNIW 30 A113 W I �_— „ µuts•.pt.i`, Hf'3tf.. Vit_..t•r I{ �. 'L o t J S110.1VINN1W 30 All.) �y � ��- AFF - rr 6 1 . a ° r a e _ : v / 1 all _- � 5 . g. '.vy t ��LL�TI,�J1�IT��'�"t--fit•+,/ •5; y - „ a r.w. u � tzla j 1 l xa»m ,mim, rwY �.1 ° '______.—_._—._.__1tl1SAi1J d0 AJdJ , =rv. �--�. ..�..« \ .,y �� xt w >. it -%�.! 17, jo F7 _.-�---.._. _.---.._._._.. ---- s : y!•-41,.1,1- r Aw^--� - .—��b ..... �, r,.,,,„,. 1 ,y _[ _,�j�J.-�,1L-,}-/�1 -dwn-i T11 Ji Ir L'if Mil 'f+ i ' T# �"r, tf �, L zi 17 r++ h Y I �• I M -4 1A 000 ` m E 0 t E H1f101VA'Id 30 A1IJ H1f101VA N11tld SIR01'IS 3 0 A.113 10 A113 uq {a Resolution 18-43 June 19, 2018 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION FOR AMENDMENT TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN’S GENERAL LAND USE PLAN MAP DESIGNATING THE PROPERTY AT 2429 DOUGLAS DRIVE NORTH TO MEDIUM-LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL WHEREAS, the City Council has met at the time and place specified in a notice duly published with respect to the subject matter hereof and has heard all interested persons, and it appearing in the interest of the public that the General Land Use Plan Map as heretofore adopted and enacted by the City of Golden Valley be amended. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council for the City of Golden Valley, that pursuant to the provision of Chapter 11.90, Subd. 7 of the City Code for the City of Golden Valley, and subject to review and approval by the Metropolitan Council for conformity with regional systems plan as provided in state law, the General Land Use Plan Map for the City of Golden Valley is hereby amended by changing the property at 2429 Douglas Drive North to Medium-Low Density Residential. _____________________________ Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: _____________________________ Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by the City Clerk. Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting June 19, 2018 60 day deadline: June 26, 2018 Agenda Item 4. G. Public Hearing ‐ Amendment to the Official Zoning Map for 2429 Douglas Drive Prepared By Amy Morgan, Planning Intern Summary An application to amend the Zoning Map was filed by the owner of the property at 2429 Douglas Drive. Retro Companies, Inc., represented by Todd Ofsthun of TCO Design, is proposing that the property be rezoned from Single Family Residential (R‐1) to Moderate Density Residential (R‐2). Official Zoning Map Amendment 2429 Douglas Drive is roughly one‐half acre in size. It is bounded by Single Family Residential (R‐1) to the north, an Institutional use (the Sandburg Athletic Fields) to the west and south, and Douglas Drive to the west. The City owns a vacant parcel directly to the south of the subject property that is also zoned R‐1. The property was purchased by Retro Companies, Inc., in 2017 after a lightning strike and fire damaged a single‐family home. The home was demolished in recent months. Rezoning 2429 Douglas Drive as Medium Density Residential (R‐2) would allow for increased residential density along the Douglas Drive corridor, consistent with the recommendations of the Douglas Drive Corridor Study conducted in 2009. This property, as well as adjacent properties, have been guided for Medium‐Low Density Residential use in the City’s draft 2040 Comprehensive Plan. A General Land Use Plan Map Amendment has also been filed for this property to reguide it for Medium‐Low Density Residential use. The Planning Commission reviewed the proposal on May 30, 2018, and recommended approval (7‐0). Attachments  Location Map (1 page)  Memo to the Planning Commission dated May 30, 2018 (2 pages)  Planning Commission Minutes dated May 30, 2018 (3 pages)  Applicant’s Narrative (3 pages)  Moderate Density Residential (R‐2) Zoning District Section of City Code (11 pages)  Official Zoning Map (1 page)  Ordinance #641, Amending the Official Zoning Map for 2429 Douglas Drive from Single Family (R‐1) to Moderate Density (R‐2) Residential (1 page) Recommended Action Motion to adopt Ordinance #641, amending the Official Zoning Map for 2429 Douglas Drive, rezoning from Single Family (R‐1) to Moderate Density (R‐2) Residential. 10 Medicine Lake Rd 6531 6525 6509 6435 6409 6339 2565 2560 z 2540 > 2530 2545 6040 is 2531 v 2527 0 8050 U' 2525 2520 2515 B 2511 �G�� 6055 s Subject Property 2516 2465 6 2505 P w 2465 2502 2501CD 2455 t 2501 c 2455 _m 2430 2445 e 2426 6127 �e�• 2435 2417 6117 $31iid/tt 2425 6107 f'htelrt Fect,W'y 2410 2415 2400 2400 6150 6140 6130 6120 6110 City 0 golden E .r 0 R A N D U 10 valley, Physical Development Department y P P 763-593-8095/763-593-8109(fax) Date: May 30, 2018 To: Golden Valley Planning Commission From: Amy Morgan, Planning Intern Subject: Informal Public Hearing—Zoning Map Amendment— 2429 Douglas Drive—Todd Ofsthun, TCO Design, Applicant Summary An application to amend the Zoning Map was filed by the owner of the property at 2429 Douglas Drive. Retro Companies, Inc., represented by Todd Ofsthun of TCO Design, is proposing that the property be zoned for Moderate Density (R-2) Residential use. The property is currently zoned for Single Family (R-1) Residential use. The applicant has also separately requested a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to reguide the property to Medium-Low Density Residential use. Background 2429 Douglas Drive is roughly one-half acre in size. It is bounded by Single Family (R-1) Residential zoning to the north, Institutional zoning (the Sandburg Athletic Fields) to the west and south, and Douglas Drive to the west. The City owns a vacant parcel directly to the south of the subject property that is also zoned R-1. The property was purchased by Retro Companies, Inc., in 2017 after a lightning strike and fire damaged a single-family home. The home was demolished in recent months. A neighborhood meeting was held at Golden Valley City Hall on Wednesday, May 16. Two members of the public attended and discussed the proposal for a small transitional care facility at this location. There were questions raised regarding traffic, parking, and disruption from construction. Evaluation While staff understands the applicant's intention is to submit an application for a transitional care facility in the near future, at this time the City is only being asked to consider an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan and a corresponding Zoning Map amendment. The land use that is being proposed would accommodate the planned facility, but it would also continue to allow the construction of a single-family home. Residential facilities serving between seven and 25 persons which are licensed by the State of Minnesota are allowed to operate in an R-2 district with a Conditional Use Permit. City staff is recommending that the property be zoned as Medium Density Residential (R-2) since it will allow for increased residential density along the Douglas Drive corridor, consistent with the recommendations of the Douglas Drive Corridor Study conducted in 2009. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the amendment to the Zoning Map to rezone the property at 2429 Douglas Drive from Single Family (R-1) Residential to Moderate Density (R-2) Residential. Attachments Location Map (1 page) Narrative (3 pages) Moderate Density (R-2) Residential Zoning District Section of City Code (11 pages) Official Zoning Map (1 page) Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission May 30, 2018 Page 14 Segelbaum said they have to conside what they believe is best for Golden Valley and t s it has been determined that loc ions that are appropriate for single family homes sho a left as is and areas that sh Id support other types of businesses should be guided way. He said he thinks R- is too large for this location when iders the impact to th ighborhood. Y y Pockl said she think ving the pro rties as they are s the most sense in order to keep the character of th ighborho as it is curt y ° Baker said the concerns they've c sse ad him to conclude that he also opposes the proposals. ] MOVED by Blum, seconded eg aum an tion carried unanimously to recommend denial of ch ng the d signation of` -5540 Golden Valley Road and 1530 Welcome Aven orth on the eneraI and Use from Low Density Residential to Me -High Density esidential. MOVED b um, seconded by Ange and motion carried unanimou recommend denial zoning the properties at 5 0-5540 Golden Valley Road and Welcome Ave North from Commercial and gle Family (R-1) Residential to Medium Density ( Residential. 5. Informal Public Hearing — General Land Use Map Amendment— 2429 Douglas Drive North — CPAM-69 Applicant: Retro Companies, Inc. Address: 2429 Douglas Drive North Purpose: To change the designation on the General Land Use Map from Low Density Residential to Medium-Low Density Residential 6. Informal Public Hearing — Property Rezoning — 2429 Douglas Drive North — Z014-08 Applicant: Retro Companies, Inc. Address: 2429 Douglas Drive North Purpose: To rezone the property from Single Family (R-1) Residential to Moderate Density (R-2) Residential Items 5 and 6 were presented and discussed together. Morgan referred to a location map of the property and explained that this property had a single family home on it, however it was struck by lightning and damaged by fire in 2017 Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission May 30, 2018 Page 15 and was recently purchased and demolished by the applicant. She stated that staff anticipates a proposal for a small transitional care facility at this location in the near future and at this time the applicant is proposing to amend the General Land Use map to guide the property from Low Density Residential to Medium-Low Density Residential and to amend the Zoning Map to rezone the property from Single Family (R-1) Residential to Moderate Density (R-2) Residential. Morgan explained that re-guiding and rezoning this property will allow for increased residential density along the Douglas Drive corridor. The permitted uses would allow for small lot single family homes and a residential facility would be allowed with a Conditional Use Permit. She stated that this proposal is consistent with the recommendations in the Douglas Drive Corridor Study conducted in 2009 and is also consistent with the draft 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Morgan stated that a neighborhood meeting was held on May 16 and that two residents attended the meeting and discussed the proposal for a small transitional care facility at this location. She noted that the questions raised at the neighborhood meeting were in regard to traffic, parking, and disruption from construction. Morgan stated that staff is recommending approval of the proposed Land Use Map and Zoning Map amendments. Todd Ofsthun, TCO Design, representing the applicant, stated that guiding this property to medium-low density and rezoning it to R-2 will fit their purposes for a small transitional care facility. Segelbaum asked what transitional care means. Ofsthun stated that it is assisted living before a memory care facility for example. Baker opened the public hearing. Seeing and hearing no one wishing to comment, Baker closed the public hearing. Baker noted that the proposed new Comp Plan guides this property Medium-Low Density. Angell asked if doing this proposal now allows them to do construction sooner. Zimmerman said that is correct. He added that if the applicant waited until the updated Comp Plan is approved it would add another year to the construction schedule. Johnson said he is supportive of both these applications. He questioned what the City will do with the vacant lot it owns to south. Zimmerman said there have been discussions regarding that property and that it is guided in the Comp Plan for Medium-Low Density as well. Blum referred to the history of the area and said this proposal goes to the understanding that this is an appropriate guiding for this property. Baker and Segelbaum agreed. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission May 30, 2018 Page 16 MOVED by Johnson, seconded by Pockl and motion carried unanimously to recommend approval of changing the designation of 2429 Douglas Drive North on the General Land Use Map from Low Density Residential to Medium-Low Density Residential. MOVED by Brookins, seconded by Johnson and motion carried unanimously to recommend approval of rezoning the property at 2429 Douglas Drive North from Single Family (R-1) Residential to Moderate Density (R-2) Residential. Informal Public Hearing — Minor S division — 7040 Glenwood Avenue — Marie Estates — SU17-16 licant: Peter Knaeble s , Add s: 7040 Glenwood Ave e F, ` Purpose. To reconfigure the a ting single family reside, al lot into two new single family residen I lots. Morgan reminded t Commission that a Iroposal regardi: 'dividing this property into three lots was heard he March 26 Pla ing Commis s meeting. She stated that the original proposal has b withdrawn an that a new plication has been submitted to demolish the existing sing amily home nd subdi J e the property into two new single family residential lots. She s d that th rivew ._ access would be moved from Glenwood Avenue to the High 55 Fr tags: oad and that land would be dedicated for a potential future cul-de-sac alon a Hi h 55 Frontage Road. Morgan referred to the subdivision re ments and stated that the minimum lot size in this case is 10,000 square feet. For the in lot a lot width of 80 feet must be maintained at the front setback line to a depth of . fe d the corner lot must maintain 100 feet of width at the front setback line to epth, f7 et as well. Morgan showed the Commis finers an lustrati of the existing conditions and of the lots after the proposed subdivis� n and stat l that the pr%kification sed new lots meet the square footage and lot width relements. Sh `'noted that a letter was sent to property owners within 500 feet d that no resp' nses were recei d and that a tree survey has /ementsare pleted. a„ discuss the eight conditions'.or approval or denial off` �Minor Subdivision listed in e and id that staff is recom ending approval of this p� posed subdivision as the l do meet all the Code requi `{ ments. a"' he noticed that there are R properties in the area and ask '" .:lif this property hose. Morgan stated that the are R-2 properties across Glenw ` d Avenue. um noted that one of the cond y ons for approval or denial of a subdi on is that ts are granted for necessary blic purposes. He questioned ifthe po tial future c will be an easement or if the property owner will be ceding the land to e City. A# Tao Dees �0 vie %We 9330 Thomas Avenue North, Brooklyn Park, MN 55444 Office 763-424-3676 cell 952-994-8276 todd@tcodesign.net April 27, 2018 Re:Zoning Map Amendments And General Land Use Map Amendment Applications 2429 Douglas Drive North Golden Valley, MN 55422 City of Golden Valley Planning Department 7800 Golden Valley Road Golden Valley, MN 55427 Retro Companies Inc. Comprehensive Care Facility — Project Narrative Background This property had a fire damaged house when Retro Companies Inc. came across it and determined it would be a nice quiet location for their project. The proposed project is an assisted living and transitional care facility with approximately 11,700 SF containing approximately 22 senior and transitional care units. The proposed structure will be two stories. The project will be located at 2429 Douglas Drive North. The existing fire damaged house has already been removed by Retro Companies, Inc. The property has Douglas Drive North to the East. The new facility will be accessed with a curb cut from Douglas Drive North. There are several advantages to a residential care facility for this neighborhood. It is important to the owner and operators that this facility is well maintained and run. All aspects of site and building maintenance will be kept to high standards. The families and groups associated with Comprehensive Care have high standards for this type of facility and for their patients. They are caring family members, medical professionals or business professionals. These types of facilities are quiet and low key. There will be no large and loud parties or gatherings. Its 24 hour a day security will be a nice buffer from the busy Douglas Drive area. The maximum number of employees when the facility is full will be 7. This is the number of employee required by the State for this type of facility and care. This is also the number that a management company needs to provide the patients with meals, personal hygiene, housekeeping and any other patient needs. Building and exterior maintenance will be out sourced. There is plenty of on-site snow storage space. The City requires 5 off street parking spaces for this type of facility with this number of beds. We are providing 12 off street spaces. Zoning and Land Use 2429 Douglas Drive North is currently guided and zoned Single-Family R-1 Residential. Retro Companies, Inc. would like to re-guide and re-zone this property to Moderate Density R-2 Residential. This requires Zoning Map Amendment and General Land Use Map Amendment applications. The property is approximately 0.58 acres. The Comprehensive Care Facility will be the sole principal structure on the property. A conditional use permit will be required to allow the assisted living use on the new R-2 zoning. Building The proposed building will consist of two floors of assisted senior living and transitional care units. There will be 8 care units on the first floor along with a generous gathering/dining space. The second will have 14 care units along with a small sitting area. There will be a total of 22 care units. An elevator will be provided in the main dining area. The residents will get assisted living care, memory care and transitional care. Transitional care being patients that need 24-hour care, but do not qualify to stay in a hospital or have family or friends that can give them that level of care. Examples would be post-op, pre-op, dialysis, bariatrics, respirator, etc. Transitional care residents are quiet and static. Memory care patients are not allowed to wander outside of the facility without being accompanied by a care team member. The facility will operate under the Minnesota state Comprehensive Care License. The proposed building will use exterior materials consistent with current residential construction. We will use a nice balance of manufactured stone and 'LP SmartSide'. The siding will be vary using a combination of textures and colors. Other architectural features such as decorative vents and brackets will be used to add visual interest. The roof will be finished with 'shake look' architectural asphalt shingles. Site The overall site is approximately 0.58 acres and the area to be disturbed for the proposed project is roughly 0.35 acres. The site is designed to meet R-2 zoning standards. Setbacks for the property are per the table below. Building Setback Pavement Setback Required Proposed Required Proposed Front/ Douglas 35 Feet 35 Feet 35 Feet 35+ Feet Drive ROW Side Yard /(North 13 Feet 13+ Feet 6.5 Feet 6.5+ Feet and South Rear Yard / 25 Feet 25+ Feet 25 Feet 25+ Feet (West) Access and Parking Site access is provided with a curb cut off Douglas Drive North. Parking has been provided to serve the proposed building in adherence to City Code with 12 exterior surface stalls. An accessible stall is provided in front of the building with a curb cut ramp providing access to the main concrete sidewalk. The stalls are 9'x18.5' and adjacent to a concrete sidewalk to account for bumper overhang. Drive aisles are 24' in width. An emergency vehicle turn around was not perceived to be necessary because of the shallow depth and access from Douglas Drive North. Landscaping and Tree Preservation Landscaping is designed to provide site character and blend into the surrounding existing tree canopy. We plan to preserve existing trees that fall outside of the grading limits and provide 6-0 tall fence screening from abutting residential properties. The project will have a proposed planting schedule which provides ample landscaping and screening for the site. The types (species) of new trees and minimum size specified meets the City ordinance. Grading, Drainage, Utilities and Stormwater Treatment Proposed site grades, drive aisles, parking areas, utilities and stormwater treatment will be addressed by our civil Engineer prior to building permit application. Retro Companies Development Schedule April, 2018-Application to the City of Golden Valley Spring/Summer, 2018- Building Permit Application Fall, 2018-Begin Construction Covu.vu.eroial Dra i�i.Q and ftovKe pes%on Dedication to excel lenee § 11.22 Section 11.22: Moderate Density Residential Zoning District (R-2) Subdivision 1. Purpose The purpose of the R-2 Zoning District is to provide for single and two-family dwellings at a moderate density (up to eight (8) units per acre) along with directly related and complementary uses. Subdivision 2. District Established Properties shall be established within the Moderate Density (R-2) Residential Zoning District in the manner provided for in Section 11.90, Subdivision 3 of this Chapter, and when thus established shall be incorporated in this Section 11.22, Subdivision 2 by an ordinance which makes cross-reference to this Section 11.22 and which shall become a part hereof and of Section 11.10, Subdivision 2 thereof, as fully as if set forth herein. In addition the Moderate Density (R-2) Residential Zoning Districts thus established, and/or any subsequent changes to the same which shall be made and established in a similar manner, shall be reflected in the official zoning map of the City as provided in Section 11.11 of this Chapter. Subdivision 3. Permitted Uses The following uses and no other shall be permitted in the R-2 Residential Districts: A. Single Family dwellings, consistent with the City's Mixed-Income Housing Policy B. Two-Family dwellings, consistent with the City's Mixed-Income Housing Policy C. Townhouses, consistent with the City's Mixed-Income Housing Policy D. Foster Family Homes E. Home occupations F. Essential Services - Class I G. No more than one (1) kitchen area and one kitchenette shall be permitted in each dwelling unit Source: Ordinance No. 631, 2nd Series Effective Date: 03-15-18 Subdivision 4. Accessory Uses The following accessory uses and no other shall be permitted in the R-2 Zoning District: A. Accessory structures, including private garages as defined in this Chapter. Golden Valley City Code Page 1 of 11 § 11.22 Subdivision S. Conditional Uses The following conditional uses may be allowed after review by the Planning Commission and approval by the Council following the standards and procedures set forth in this Chapter: A. Residential facilities serving from seven (7) to twenty-five (25) persons B. Group foster family homes Source: Ordinance No. 371, 2nd Series Effective Date: 07-13-07 Subdivision 6. Buildable Lots No dwelling or accessory structure shall be erected for use or occupancy as a residential dwelling on any tract of unplatted land which does not conform with the requirements of this Section, except on those lots located within an approved plat. A. Single Family Dwellings. A lot of a minimum area of six thousand (6,000) square feet and a minimum width of fifty (50) feet at the front setback line shall be required for one (1) Single Family Dwelling. B. Two-Family Dwellings. A lot of a minimum area of ten thousand (10,000) square feet and a minimum width of one-hundred (100) feet at the front setback line shall be required for a Two-Family Dwelling. Source: Ordinance No. 602, 2nd Series Effective Date: 06-07-16 Subdivision 7. Corner Visibility All structures in the R-2 Zoning District shall meet the requirements of the corner visibility requirements in Chapter 7 of the City Code. Subdivision 8. Easements No structures in the R-2 Zoning District shall be located in dedicated public easements. Source: Ordinance No. 371, 2nd Series Effective Date: 07-13-07 Subdivision 9. Building Lot Coverage Structures, including accessory structures, shall not occupy more than thirty percent (30%) of the lot area. Subdivision 10. Impervious Surface Total impervious surface on any lot shall not exceed fifty percent (50%) of the lot or parcel area. Subdivision 11. Principal Structures Principal structures in the R-2 Zoning District shall be governed by the following requirements: Golden Valley City Code Page 2 of 11 § 11.22 A. Setback Requirements. The following structure setbacks shall be required for principal structures in the R-2 Zoning District. Garages or other accessory structures which are attached to the house or main structure shall also be governed by these setback requirements, except for stair landings up to twenty-five (25) square feet in size and for handicapped ramps. 1. Front Setback. The required minimum front setback shall be thirty-five (35) feet from any front property line along a street right-of-way line. Open front porches, with no screens, may be built to within thirty (30) feet of a front property line along a street right-of-way line. Source: Ordinance No. 371, 2nd Series Effective Date: 07-13-07 2. Rear Setback. The required rear setback shall be twenty-five (25) feet. Source: Ordinance No. 547, 2nd Series Effective Date: 03-26-15 3. Side Setback. Side yard setbacks are determined by the lot width at the minimum required front setback line. The distance between a structure and the side lot lines shall be governed by the following requirements: a. In the case of lots having a width of one hundred (100) feet or greater, the side setbacks for any portion of a structure fifteen (15) feet or less in height shall be fifteen (15) feet. The side setbacks for any portion of a structure greater than fifteen (15) feet in height shall be measured to an inwardly sloping plane at a ratio of 2:1 beginning at a point fifteen (15) feet directly above the side setback line [see Figure below]; 2'1 slope Average height of highest ------------------------------ Pitched roof 2g'maximum -------------------------------- Flat roof 25'maximum 15'height 15'height 15'side setback 15'side setback Lot width 100'or greater b. In the case of lots having a width greater than sixty-five (65) feet and less than one hundred (100) feet, the side setbacks for any portion of a structure fifteen (15) feet or less in height shall be twelve and one- half (12.5) feet. The side setbacks for any portion of a structure greater than fifteen (15) feet in height shall be measured to an Golden Valley City Code Page 3 of 11 § 11.22 inwardly sloping plane at a ratio of 2:1 beginning at a point fifteen (15) feet directly above the side setback line [see Figure below]; 2:1 slope � Average heightof highest pitched root 2g'maximum ` -- - - - Flat roof 25'maximum 15'height 15'height 12.5'side setback 12.5'side setback Lot width greater than 65'&less than 100' c. In the case of lots having a width of sixty five (65) feet or less, the side setbacks for any portion of a structure fifteen (15) feet or less in height along the north or west side shall be ten percent (10%) of the lot width and along the south or east side shall be twenty percent (20%) of the lot width (up to twelve and one-half (12.5) feet). The side setback for any portion of a structure greater than fifteen (15) feet in height measured to an inwardly sloping plane at a ratio of 4:1 beginning at a point fifteen (15) feet directly above the side setback line [see Figure below]; , , 4:1 slope I Average height of highest pitched roof 28'maximum Flat roof 25'maximum 15'height 15'height South or East North or West Side setback 20%of lot width Side setback 10%of lot width Lot width 65' or less Source: Ordinance No. 602, 2nd Series Effective Date: 06-07-16 Golden Valley City Code Page 4 of 11 § 11.22 4. Corner Lot Setbacks. To determine the side yard setback, use the shorter Front Lot Line. Source: Ordinance No. 547, 2nd Series Effective Date: 03-26-15 5. Building Envelope. Taken together, the front, rear, and side setbacks and the height limitation shall constitute the building envelope [see Figures below]. No portion of a structure may extend outside the building envelope, except for: a. cornices and eaves, no more than thirty (30) inches: b. bay windows or chimney chases, no more than twenty-four (24) inches; c. chimneys, vents, or antennas; d. stairs and stair landings up to twenty-five (25) square feet in size; e. accessible ramps. Reif tel Lrie ?• Rear Yard V Side Lat 1 n4 Rc,rt Ywd SIGe t H� gh'. to]t,m- Building t'asnrl�t,� v i 5i I Ftant'c'�rp d w P'14(it 11:41f' ' B. Height Limitations. No principal structure shall be erected in the R-2 Zoning District with a building height exceeding twenty-eight (28) feet for pitched roof houses and twenty-five (25) feet for flat roof houses. Golden Valley City Code Page 5 of 11 § 11.22 C. Structure Width Requirements. No principal structure shall be less than twenty-two (22) feet in width as measured from the exterior of the exterior walls. D. Side Wall Articulation. For any new construction, whether a new house, addition, or replacement through a tear-down, any resulting side wall longer than thirty-two (32) feet in length must be articulated, with a shift of at least two (2) feet in depth, for at least eight (8) feet in length, for every thirty-two (32) feet of wall. E. Decks attached to principal structure. Decks over eight (8) inches from ground level shall meet the same setbacks as the principal structure. F. Fences. For the purpose of setbacks, fences are not considered structures. Source: Ordinance No. 602, 2nd Series Effective Date: 06-07-16 Subdivision 12. Accessory Structures Accessory structures shall be governed by the following requirements: A. Location and Setback Requirements. The following location regulations and setbacks shall be required for accessory structures in the R-2 Zoning District: 1. Location. A detached accessory structure shall be located completely to the rear of the principal structure, unless it is built with frost footings. In that case, an accessory structure may be built no closer to the front setback and side setback as the principal structure. If an addition is built on to an existing principal structure that would create a situation where an existing garage or accessory structure would not be completely to the rear of the addition to the principal structure, the addition to the principal structure may be built and the existing garage or accessory structure may remain and be considered conforming as long as there is at least ten (10) feet of separation between the existing principal structure with the addition and the existing garage or accessory structure. Additions may be made to the existing garage or accessory structure as long as the ten (10) feet of separation can be met. 2. Front Setback. Accessory structures shall be located no less than thirty- five (35) feet from the front property line along a street right-of-way line. 3. Side and Rear Setbacks. Detached accessory structures shall be located no less than five (5) feet from a side or rear yard property line. 4. Separation between Structures. Accessory structures shall be located no less than ten (10) feet from any principal structure and from any other accessory structure. Golden Valley City Code Page 6 of 11 § 11.22 5. Alleys. Accessory structures shall be located no less than five (5) feet from an alley. B. Height limitations. No accessory structure shall be erected in the R-2 Zoning District to exceed a height of one (1) story. One (1) story may not exceed ten (10) feet from the floor to the top plate. Attic space in accessory structures shall be used only for storage and/or utility space. C. Garage Provisions. 1. Minimum Garage Stalls. No building permit shall be issued for the construction of a new principal structure in the R-2 Zoning District not including at least a one (1) stall garage per dwelling unit. 2. Maximum Garage Width. The width of the front wall of a garage, whether attached or detached, shall not exceed sixty-five percent (65%) of the width of the dwelling's front fagade. For purposes of this subsection, a dwelling's front fagade means that portion of the dwelling's building facing a front lot line that includes any front wall of a garage and provides vehicular access to the garage. a. Measurement of Front Fagade. In the case of a Single Family Dwelling, the width of the front fagade shall be the direct, linear, horizontal distance between the dwelling's exterior side walls at the front fagade's widest point. In the case of a Two-Family Dwelling or Townhome, the width of the front fagade shall be the direct, linear, horizontal distance between the dwelling unit's side boundary walls at the front fagade's widest point. b. Measurement of Front Garage Wall. For purposes of this subsection, the front wall of a garage shall be the wall of the garage facing the front lot line, including any door providing vehicular access to the garage. The width of the front wall shall be the direct, linear, horizontal distance between the exterior or outermost location of the garage's two side walls at their intersection with the garage's front wall. D. Cornices and Eaves. Cornices and eaves may not project more than thirty (30) inches into a required setback. E. Accessory structures including detached and attached garages, detached sheds, greenhouses and gazebos shall be limited in size to a total of six hundred fifty (650) square feet per dwelling unit. Swimming pools are not included in this requirement. Any accessory structure over two hundred (200) square feet in area requires a building permit. F. Size of Accessory Structure. No accessory structure shall be larger in size than the principal structure. Golden Valley City Code Page 7 of 11 § 11.22 G. Swimming pools. Swimming pools shall meet the same setback and location requirements as accessory structures. Setbacks shall be measured from the property line to the pool's edge. Decks surrounding above ground pools shall meet setback requirements. H. Decks. Free standing decks or decks attached to accessory structures shall meet the same setback requirements as accessory structures. Source: Ordinance No. 602, 2nd Series Effective Date: 06-07-16 I. Central Air Conditioning Units. Central air conditioning units shall not be allowed in the front yard of any single or two-family dwelling. Source: Ordinance No. 371, 2nd Series Effective Date: 07-13-07 I Roof. Gambrel or Mansard roofs are not permitted on any accessory building with a footprint of more than two hundred (200) square feet. Source: Ordinance No. 602, 2nd Series Effective Date: 06-07-16 K. Photovoltaic Modules. Free-standing Photovoltaic modules, including solar panels and other photovoltaic energy receivers, which are in excess of three (3) square feet shall meet the same setback, location and height requirements as accessory structures. Source: Ordinance No. 443, 2nd Series Effective Date: 8-13-10 Subdivision 13. Decks and Platforms Decks and platforms not more than thirty (30) inches but greater than eight (8) inches above adjacent grade and not attached to a structure with frost footings and which is not part of an accessible route shall require a zoning permit issued by the City Manager or his/her designee. The fee for the zoning permit is established by the City Council. The purpose of the zoning permit is to insure that decks greater than eight (8) inches but less than thirty (30) inches in height are located in a conforming location on the lot. Subdivision 14. Home Occupation Requirements A. Home occupations in the R-2 Zoning District shall be governed by the following requirements: 1. The use of the dwelling for the occupation or profession shall be incidental and secondary to the use of the dwelling for residential purposes. 2. The exterior appearance of the structure shall not be altered for the operation of the home occupation. Golden Valley City Code Page 8 of 11 § 11.22 3. There shall be no outside storage or display of anything related to the home occupation. 4. An accessory structure, including a garage, shall not be used for a home occupation. 5. A permitted occupation, shall not result in noise, fumes, traffic, lights, odor, excessive sewage or water use or garbage service, electrical, radio or TV interference in a manner detrimental to the health, safety, enjoyment and general welfare of the surrounding residential neighborhood. 6. No physical products shall be displayed or sold on the premises except such that are incidental to the permitted home occupation. 7. No signs or symbols shall be displayed other than those permitted for residential purposes. 8. Clients, deliveries and other business activity where persons come to the home shall be limited to between the hours of 9 am and 9 pm. 9. No more than twenty percent (20%) of the gross floor area of the dwelling shall be used for the home occupation. 10. Parking related to the home occupation shall be provided only on the driveway of the property where the home occupation operates. 11. A home occupation shall not generate more than eight (8) client trips per day and serve no more than two (2) clients or customers at a time. 12. There shall only be one (1) outside employee allowed on the premises at which a home occupation is located. 13. All other applicable City, State and Federal licenses, codes and regulations shall be met. B. The following uses are prohibited home occupations: 1. Repair, service, building, rebuilding or painting of autos, trucks, boats and other vehicles 2. Restaurants or cafes 3. Animal hospital 4. Veterinarian Clinic 5. Funeral Home, mortuary or columbarium Golden Valley City Code Page 9 of 11 § 11.22 6. Medical/Dental clinic or similar 7. Stable or kennel 8. Repair and service of items that cannot be carried by one (1) person and repair and service of any item involving an internal combustion engine or motor 9. Retail sales 10. Sale or repair of firearms Subdivision 15. Outdoor Storage Outdoor storage of items on properties within the R-2 Zoning District is governed by the following provisions: A. Front Yard Storage. 1. Storage of items in the front yard may occur solely upon a driveway, and in no other location. 2. No personal motorized recreational vehicle or boat may be stored in a front yard, except upon a trailer. 3. Only one (1) of the following may be stored in all front yards of any lot: a. Recreational camping vehicle; b. Trailer. The term "trailer", as used in this Subdivision, means a trailer for multiple purposes including but not limited to hauling a boat, personal motorized recreational vehicle, or fish house. 4. Storage in the front yard of items other than those listed in Subdivision 15(A)(3) above may not exceed thirty (30) days unless a Front Yard Storage Permit is issued to the property owner. A Front Yard Storage Permit may be issued at the discretion of the City Manager or his/her designee. B. Setbacks. 1. Front Yard Storage. Any storage of items in the front yard shall be behind the property line. 2. Side Yard Storage. Items stored in that portion of the side yard to the front of the rear yard, may not be stored within three (3) feet of the property line. Items stored in that portion of the side yard to the rear of the primary structure or attached garage, may not be stored within five (5) feet of the property line. Golden Valley City Code Page 10 of 11 § 11.22 3. Rear Yard Storage. Items stored in the rear yard may not be stored within five (5) feet of the property line. C. Screening. Side and Rear Yard Storage. Any storage of a recreational camping vehicle, fish house, trailer, boat, or personal motorized recreational vehicle in the side or rear yard must be screened using either vegetative screening or a fence in accordance with Section 11.72 of this Chapter. Subdivision 16. Temporary Outdoor Storage Temporary Outdoor Storage in the R-2 Zoning District shall be governed by the following requirements: A. Duration. Temporary outdoor storage units shall not be stored on a property for more than seven (7) days. B. Location. Temporary outdoor storage units shall be stored on a hard surface and be located completely on private property. Subdivision 17. Paved Area Requirements Paved areas in the Moderate Density Residential (R-2) Zoning District, include those constructed of concrete, bituminous pavement, or pavers, and are governed by the following provisions: A. Driveways built or reconstructed on or after January 1, 2005, shall be paved. B. Setbacks. Paved areas shall be setback three (3) feet from a side yard property line, except for shared driveways used by multiple property owners pursuant to a private easement. C. Coverage. No more than forty percent (40%) of the front yard may be covered with concrete, bituminous pavement, or pavers. D. Street Access. Each lot may have only one (1) street curb cut access, except the following lots may have up to two (2) street curb cut accesses: 1. A lot that contains two (2) legally constructed garages. 2. A lot of a resident that requires additional driveway access that qualifies for a reduced class rate for homestead property as defined by MN Statute 273.13 subdivision 22 Class lb. Source: Ordinance No. 602, 2nd Series Effective Date: 06-07-16 Subdivision 18. Garden Structures Garden Structures shall be located no closer than five (5) feet to any property line. Garden Structures shall not exceed ten (10) feet in height. Source: Ordinance No. 433, 2nd Series Effective Date: 2-26-10 Golden Valley City Code Page 11 of 11 ji wa 15g •L �' W ! 3 .- o u y tri S E Y. o>cu RA N e 28 y v 5 g 9 0& S G r q e ^ c I6 a E o /+rnnnmA�� •�� N C+7 Q1 a rcri •� ++ r+ +`+ .a.. Gl. i1 O �l" ! CZ E o 44 .v.(fu» u. i p N -S3 $ !E € v x..t�l � �, � 'v, '-' •� b b •b w v:W W QIQ Pq U > � , Nc omo � 1 1Q bOi t5l Hr O W �p r Q Q v C c a �?! G cn J) cn cn cn €l�g /°�' k s z €og. N a o p N •f...� w Q U) cn J) v N� b y G L' G v v g e Q 5 r; a u E N §; o > "d �b�A �C €�75s z -S" g o Q o ..; M $.€ ur OSE a = WL �, _ $ _ U U N ODDI IDIS s o N m o ,�-�_ 5 B m a S11odtl3NN1W 30 A1IJ 9110dtl3NN1W 30 A.U.) o W a p pp Y a _ F a ` �,✓ v'oe, ••••v. 4 )u 5190dtl9NNIW 30 ALIJ II. � ,. ..� .Nl�� •"aa �� H � 'li n�ra «fes S w+•xr.. c III �,rv•�p $ qq gg qq •rv.r•Mx 0"1y r# 3 � 5 u r : a #1 I^ � .ht_?� r 37 tlQSN1flflON � A 8 d u ! •xr;�a a � � �.. $-0 '. � p •��' Nx.,,. � +r NM N•xv".x e ••�M f / I • xur 1 \ �Yxx �� ,.p�"" .... �!"Ij $ 9]rur nr i ( i= �u "d\Y� , x•Y•n f "5•.n� ^xxx t �� b4y,x � 1 r o.aw d"a4.xnru � ane...r gtgt jj � IR� � � .� ., x r•^ S Nrr ja. .alJ dJ b,.nx �/ _ ... SS 15 l 1 .. r.NN xwwN � Y dl� uox.. ` �•° � 1B Pr � � w.rw �• x..s°` t 3 ,� M ;,., x.,r xYMxrw+,.,r.�,x•N Nw.xx•a. _..•77- �� .Nxxx"ww .]��. rx•rnx x r xnN $ �i ....Y.«•nYM 1 a F x rx,a r ( MWo.4 __ Nw,vWy.. at • 2g ,. .0 .o - ! J.rel S'.. ro $'. `� ,� � x r w ��. .i-- i�, i =�"a i ;Ry��1W'9•.,�"• _.�. Yxrw r�+• J « w � � a air &� x Y•,. � a �"° �r� �I .,._ - !/�//� � `+" ru•. e. .r.„,• � /` ii � .r.o w. .� � ,rao Ny �; ,�� y ,.. •, � r g g �Y amt.=- L •IticsiciO do A --� ,� <�a•.Y.. __'�� .�„:,�- �-r•N ,.,., r'k avr CL 3 �� E�.•a� L'yj'.i � � ..o» ,. ] eS i��yr hY,,s"`*•we vx,-, x `\ I b..0 77 < � ........•x . < 6 � x rewn 1 •�3 M .. ■F •t .0 4 x r, .•r � Y S .o.r. - U a , � +•, � r w.x s F r ni u i ry.w.{,oy 'v`Mrn �.: F Ym �j . 9F I y : xwr.•a•m � A �I� r \ o ° U M d MuV,„•I N v wnnr vW j�n"r• oa �M _ wv MON -+� ...M,j '. lZ W•+ .... ^n,.x.r..a � - x^„r.,..w r4 rs°. � �- �.. -/ -�Sx••r•o p1 �� +x...t,„F Z` 3e� am•°f t ..... i z anvo `� � � \\ �w ax.ry `” v J$ '"�.+rr, N i rsenWr b ". 6 ro� nftxl•am"M e x rYa•wa,IM pp IL ar ,Y'r z 00 3 s A ,' Hd.001YA3d d0 A.LIJ ��`'H1flOWA 'MBtld S1007'.LS 'a�3i`o I J 10 A.L I'J �s S>a o C U 1� ORDINANCE NO. 641, 2ND SERIES AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE Rezoning 2429 Douglas Drive North from Single Family (R-1) Residential to Moderate Density (R-2) Residential City of Golden Valley, Applicant The City Council for the City of Golden Valley hereby ordains as follows: Section 1. City Code Chapter 11 entitled “Land Use Regulations (Zoning)” is amended in Section 11.10, Subd. 2, by changing the zoning designation of certain tracts of land from Single Family (R-1) Residential to Moderate Density (R-2) Residential. Section 2. The tracts of land affected by this ordinance are legally described as: The South 99.8 feet of the East 276.07 feet of the North ½ of the Northeast ¼ of the Northeast ¼ except the road. Section 3. City Code Chapter 1 entitled “General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation” and Section 11.99 entitled “Violation a Misdemeanor” are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 4. This ordinance shall take effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law. Adopted by the City Council this 19th day of June, 2018. /s/Shepard M. Harris Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: /s/Kristine A. Luedke Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting June 19, 2018 Agenda Item 6. A. Second Consideration Ordinance #639 Amending the 2018 Master Fee Schedule for Legal Review Prepared By Sue Virnig, Finance Director Summary Tonight is the second consideration of Ordinance #639 Amending the 2018 Master Fee Schedule to provide fees for Legal Review at the amount of $100 per hour. This fee will be effective on July 16 when the in-house attorney is on staff. First Consideration of the Ordinance was held on June 5, 2018 Council Meeting. Attachments: • Ordinance #639 amending the 2018 Master Fee Schedule for Legal Review (1 page) Recommended Action Motion to adopt second consideration Ordinance 639, amending the 2018 Master Fee Schedule for Legal Review. ORDINANCE NO. 639, 2ND SERIES AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE Amending 2018 Master Fee Schedule for Legal Review Fees The City Council for the City of Golden Valley hereby ordains: Section 1. The 2018 Master Fee Schedule in Chapter 25 of the City Code is hereby amended effective July 16, 2018, by adding the following new fee: Legal Review $100 per hour Section 2. City Code Chapter 1 entitled “General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation” is hereby adopted in its entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law. Adopted by the City Council this 19th day of June, 2018. /s/Shepard M. Harris Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: /s/Kristine A. Luedke Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk