03-10-20 HRA Agenda PacketWORK SESSION AGENDA
Pages
1.Housing Strategic Plan 2-15
2.HRA Levy and Budget 17-22
3.Fair Housing Policy 23-26
4.Adjournment
March 10, 2020 – 6:30 pm
Council Conference Room
Golden Valley City Hall
7800 Golden Valley Road
Golden Valley Housing and Redevelopment Authority Work Session
March 10, 2020
Agenda Item
1. Housing Strategic Plan
Prepared By
Marc Nevinski, Physical Development Director
Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager
Summary
In a Council Manager meeting on March 12, 2019, staff presented the annual housing work plan to the
City Council. The information covered included a detailed discussion of tools the Housing and
Redevelopment Authority (HRA) could use to support affordable housing efforts, including the
possibility of adopting an HRA levy. The Council directed staff to develop a Housing Strategic Plan in
order to understand how the money generated through a levy might be utilized. In December of 2019,
staff reported to the Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) on the steps being taken to conduct
a Strategic Planning Process in order to help the City develop goals and priorities around housing for
the next 5-10 years. At this work session, staff will update the Commissioners on the progress of these
efforts and look for feedback on next steps.
Strategic Plan
Cathy Bennett, of Bennett Community Consulting, has prepared a memo (attached) detailing her
findings after collecting input from elected officials, individuals appointed to various City Boards and
Commissions, representatives of affordable housing advocacy groups, the Golden Valley Business
Council, and the Hopkins School district. The top three identified housing priorities are:
1. Preservation of Existing Housing and Tenant Protections
2. Increase Housing Affordability and Diversify Housing Options and Opportunity
3. Increase the Diversity of Voices in Decision Making
Increased capacity is needed to implement recently adopted and proposed policies and programs. Ms.
Bennett highlights two areas, also detailed in her memo:
1. The creation of a staff position dedicated to housing and economic development
2. Adopting an HRA Levy, establishing a Local Housing Trust Fund, and/or adopting a Public
Subsidy Policy
Housing and Economic Development Manager
Housing and Redevelopment Authority Work Session Executive Summary
City of Golden Valley
March 10, 2020
2
To achieve the goals identified in the Strategic Planning memorandum, staff recommends hiring a new
position to focus on the City’s housing and economic development interests. The position would be
responsible for the following duties:
Housing Duties
• Lead the implementation of the City’s housing initiatives, including the Mixed Income Housing
Policy, the 4d tax program, the Fair Housing Policy, and the Tenant Protection ordinance,
among others.
• Understand and coordinate various funding sources for affordable housing initiatives and
development including CDBG, MHFA funding, and tax increment financing.
• Engage with Hennepin County and MHFA to identify resources to achieve housing goals.
• Maintain a current list of affordable housing resources and contacts.
• Monitor the housing market, including monthly rent, vacancy, and trends.
• Build collaborative relationships with multi-family property owners and managers, civic groups,
industry groups, and non-profit organizations to advance the City’s housing initiatives and serve
residents.
• Conduct research, draft policies, and develop initiatives supporting the City’s housing and
development goals.
Economic Development Duties
• Lead the implementation of the City’s economic development strategy, including business
retention visits, business attraction initiatives, and promotion of development opportunities.
• Coordinate and promote economic development initiatives (Open to Business, CEO Next), and
resources (MIF loans, TIF).
• Support relationships with entities such as the Chamber of Commerce, DEED, Hennepin County,
GreaterMSP, commercial real estate brokers, and lenders.
• Research, compile, and update key economic metrics for Golden Valley and monitor other
relevant economic trends.
• Maintain a current contact list of Golden Valley businesses.
• Track and monitor economic development related legislation, bills, and resources.
The salary range for such a position is projected to be $96,000 to $115,000, plus benefits. An analysis
of other cities in the area with similar positions suggests this is a competitive salary. Funding for salary
and benefits, plus programmatic resources, are proposed to come from an HRA levy of $165,000
dollars.
Housing Redevelopment Authority vs. Economic Development Authority
To facilitate community development related activities, the legislature has granted cities the authority
to establish Housing and Redevelopment Authorities (HRA) and Economic Development Authorities
(EDA), among other entities. HRAs are tasked with two main functions – eliminate or prevent blight
and facilitate affordable housing. EDAs are focused on promoting and fostering economic
development.
Housing and Redevelopment Authority Work Session Executive Summary
City of Golden Valley
March 10, 2020
3
In many ways, the powers of HRAs and EDAs are similar, such as acquiring or selling property, making
loans, becoming a project partner, issuing bonds, and employing staff. These activities must be done in
the pursuit of HRA or EDA authorized functions. Differences between HRA’s and EDA’s powers are
subtle but important. For example, HRAs can levy outside of a city’s levy limits (with Council approval),
but EDAs must request the City to levy for economic development funding, which means an EDA levy
falls within a city’s levy limits. EDAs can invest in businesses to provide equity or venture capital and
make improvements to land. EDAs also have the powers of HRAs, and a council can set limits on its
EDA powers. The attached comparison provides more detail on the similarities and differences
between HRAs and EDAs.
Golden Valley is a fully developed city experiencing reinvestment and redevelopment. In recent years,
the City has increased its focus on addressing housing related concerns and developed several tools to
enhance its housing resources. For these reasons, staff recommends the Council focus on increasing
the HRA’s capacity to prevent blight, facilitate redevelopment, and help fulfill Golden Valley’s housing
goals.
Next Steps
Staff is looking for feedback on the following items:
1. Do the housing priorities identified as part of the Strategic Planning Process, outlined above,
feel like the appropriate priorities for the HRA?
2. Is there support for creating a Housing and Economic Development Manager staff position?
3. Is there support for moving forward with the consideration of an HRA levy?
Financial Or Budget Considerations
Moving forward with the above proposals would add a new and additional levy of $165,000 in 2021 to
fund a staff position. Details of this levy are discussed in an executive summary to the HRA prepared by
Finance Director Sue Virnig and dated March 10, 2020.
Supporting Documents
• Memo from Bennett Community Consulting dated February 28, 2020 (7 pages)
• Local Housing Trust Fund Manual summary (1 page)
• Golden Valley Renter Snapshot (1 page)
• HRA vs. EDA document (3 pages)
Memorandum
To: City of Golden Valley
Marc Nevinski, Physical Development Director
Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager
From: Cathy Capone Bennett, Bennett Community Consulting (BCC)
Date: February 28, 2020
Re: Update on Golden Valley HRA Strategic Planning Process
Bennett Community Consulting was hired by the City of Golden Valley's Housing and Redevelopment
Authority (HRA) to guide and support the City in the development of a Housing Strategic Plan.
The work is building off the goals and objectives outlined in the City's recently adopted 2040
Comprehensive Plan as well as the research and review of the housing needs, and the policies and tools that
have been considered and adopted by the City over the past two years.
The main objective of the process is to develop a Housing Strategic Plan that will solidify the key goals,
priorities, actions and funding needs of the City over the next 5-10 years.
SUMMARY OF THE PROCESS
To more fully understand the Golden Valley HRA goals and priorities, the process included the following:
• Input from HRA members through a work session discussion on December 2019 followed by an
online survey conducted and completed by all members of the current HRA in January 2020.
• Input from the Human Rights Commission and Rising Tides through a survey outlining the key issues
and housing needs of the City.
• Phone interviews with affordable housing advocates, PRISM, representative from the Business
Advisory Council and the Hopkins School District. Additional attempts were made to connect with
other key businesses in the City and the Robbinsdale School District without response to date.
• Review of the Maxfield Research housing studies, past memos and council work session tape from
the March 12, 2019 work session (attached) regarding housing policies and tools adopted and
considered by the City.
• The approved 2040 Comprehensive Plan identified the five main goals for housing to include
quality, variety, affordability, sustainability and equity.
• While the process did not include conversations with developers specifically related to Golden
Valley, BCC has extensive experience working with market rate and affordable housing developers
within the metro area and understands the key issues and necessary partnerships require to
effectively develop housing in the western suburban market. These include:
Page 2
o Leadership and “consistency of vision” are keys to successful communities, especially
the alignment of policy direction between elected officials and staff. A clear vision,
reacting appropriately to opportunities, and being open to partnering on innovative
financial tools to achieve common goals is the most important trait developers look for
in a City.
o Ensuring that the staff’s first contact with the development community is positive can
immediately help to build civic trust. The development community’s perception of a
City is often formed by their “first touch” with the staff. Are they friendly, open to ideas
and helpful with the City’s development processes? Are they aligned with the vision
and goals of the planning commission and council?
o Be on the forefront of innovation. Developers are looking for cities that are open to
new ideas and aspirations. How easy is it to do small but great things? It’s critical to
make it easy for “small actors” to be part of great places.
KEY FINDINGS:
Based upon the survey results, interviews and past research, the following are observed as the top
three housing priorities for the City over the next 5 -10 years.
1. Preservation of Existing Housing and Tenant Protections. All the interviews and surveys indicated
the importance of preserving the existing housing stock and providing options to protect tenants
and existing homeowners from being priced out of the City. As a first ring suburb where most of
the development occurred between 1950s and 1970’s, the City’s existing housing stock is aging and
in potential need of improvement and preservation. Over 55% of the housing stock was
constructed during this time. The most affordable housing, both rental and ownership, is within
the existing older properties. Golden Valley is a desirable location close to major job centers, great
freeway access and only a few minutes from the downtown core of Minneapolis. Given the age of
the housing stock and the desirable location, there is an incentive for investors to purchase existing
housing. While private investment in existing housing is positive, there are risks of existing
residents being priced out of the market and potentially displaced. This is particularly true of the
older multi-family housing stock referred to as NOAH (Naturally Occurring Affordable Housing).
Current and Potential Tools and Strategies:
• The City has taken positive steps by adopting programs and policies to protect residents
from displacement while encouraging renovation of the housing stock. This includes the
tenant protection ordinance and 4d tax reduction program. While these programs are a
great preservation strategy, additional focus on working directly with the owners and
tenants to educate them on the policies and programs will be important to ensure that
they are being effectively implemented and administered.
• An additional strategy to consider is supporting the renovation of older common interest
communities (townhomes and condominiums) through a state legislative authority
referred to as Housing Improvement Areas (HIA).
• Providing focus on preservation of the older rental and ownership housing and tenant
protections will require additional staff capacity than is currently available at the City.
Page 3
2. Increase Housing Affordability and Diversify Housing Options and Opportunity in the City. Sixty-
five percent of the housing stock in the City is single family detached home. Most of these homes
are over 50 years old. The City has seen construction of new multi-family rental housing since
2016 with over 1,200 new units. However, only 4 percent of those units can be considered
“affordable” to a household earning less than 60 percent of the area median income which is
$60,000 for a family of four. Providing opportunities to diversify the housing options in the City
and supporting affordable housing opportunities was indicated as a key priority through the
surveys and interviews with housing advocates. This includes options for seniors as well as the
younger generation.
Current and Potential Tools and Strategies:
A. Senior housing. According to the Maxfield Research report, population growth from 2016 to
2021 is expected in all ages except 45 to 54-year olds. The 65 to 84 age cohorts are projected to
have the greatest growth (percentage and numerically) increasing by 941 people (+53.8%) in
Golden Valley between 2016 and 2021. In addition, the study indicated that the incomes of the
older residents in Golden Valley are lower than the median incomes in the City.
• To address senior housing needs the City should consider providing programs and services
for existing senior homeowners to remain in the community. According to the City staff
memo dated March 12, 2019, many senior households wish to remain in the City within
their existing homes. This does not allow for turn-over of the existing homes to allow new
younger residents to purchase the more affordable existing housing in the community.
Therefore, it may be beneficial to not only provide access to services to allow older
residents to age in place but also to provide home renovation programs and support new
senior housing options that would be affordable for the existing residents to move into;
freeing up the existing housing stock for younger generations.
• While a few senior housing projects have been developed in the City since 2016, it can be
assumed that the majority of the projected growth of those over age 65 will be from
existing residents aging in place indicating a need to prioritize housing programs and
services for older residents in the City. This can include home renovation programs
including accessibility and visit-ability improvements to existing homes, deferred
maintenance and support of increasing multi-generational improvements or options to
allow units to be constructed on site or within existing building footprint called accessory
dwelling units (ADU). Also providing access to senior housing services such as in-home
health care, transportation options and listing of senior independence and/or assisted
living facilities in the area would help to support the senior residents with options to move
from existing single family homes to more maintenance free living.
• Also, while Golden Valley is fully developed the City should consider options to support
affordable senior housing development through increased density of redevelopment
parcels in the City.
• The survey of key stakeholders also indicated the concern related to increases in taxes on
senior households. Providing support through tax rebate type programs, lower rate of
Page 4
service fees or other concessions could be an option for lower income seniors in the City.
However, while this may be a valid concern, additional study should be completed to
understand the full extent of the issue.
B. Opportunities to retain and attract younger generations. In addition to focusing on the needs
of seniors in the community it will be important to attract and retain the younger generation by
supporting development that is desired by this generation. The younger generation values a
sense of place which includes social and technological connectedness, sustainability, diversity
and housing affordability. Walkability and access to amenities and gathering spaces are
particularly important to this generation as is the availability of rental housing and affordable
smaller sized single-family options.
• According to Maxfield Research Housing study, the Golden Valley population of 18 to 34-
year old’s is expected to increase by 168 people (+9.6%) between 2016 and 2021. These
are the residents that tend to rent and may be looking to put down roots in the community
by purchasing their first home. In addition, they are the key age groups to focus on with
targeted programs to attract and retain them in the community.
• The median sales price of homes in the City at the end of 2019, according to the
Minneapolis Realtors Association, was $343,000 and included over 400 sales: up 10% from
the previous year.
• With limited options to purchase the more affordable existing housing in the City,
additional focus should be provided to supporting smaller lot developments and options to
create more affordable first-time purchases through community land trusts, down
payment assistance and lower mortgage options. In addition, being a conduit for the sale
of existing single-family homes currently occupied by senior households by supporting gap
funding for first time buyers may be a strategy to regenerate existing older single-family
neighborhoods.
• At the same time, continuing to support new affordable rental options will provide an
opportunity for the younger generation to “try out” a community prior to making the
transition to home ownership. These options provide an attractive opportunity for the
younger generation who may want to eventually transition from the apartment lifestyle to
homeownership in communities that are affordable, have good schools and that provide
urban amenities that they enjoy within apartment life.
3. Increase Diversity of Voices in Decision Making. As suburban cities change in age, gender and
ethnicity, it will be important to provide opportunities to understand the values and challenges of
diverse voices and opinions. The housing options that were once desired by the older generations
have changed and will continue to evolve. Input from housing advocates, Rising Tides and the
Human Rights Commission indicated that providing additional opportunities to hear varied voices
from residents, including renters, is important in serving the current and future interests of the
City.
Page 5
Current and Potential Tools and Strategies:
• The City should consider various ways to authentically and regularly engage diverse voices
in the community, particularly related to housing needs. Priority should be made to
engage multiple voices including seniors, the younger generation, businesses, renters,
owners and representatives that are racially and culturally diverse as part of the
implementing the HRA’s Strategic Plan.
INCREASE CAPACITY TO IMPLEMENT SUGGESTED POLICIES AND PROGRAMS
The City should be commended for adopting several housing tools and policies over the last several
years. These include the following:
• Mixed Income Housing Policy that requires all new housing developments include a
percentage of affordable units
• Tenant Protection Ordinance
• 4d Tax Incentive Program
• Study related to the usage of City Owned Properties
• Consideration of a local Fair Housing Policy
To accurately implement and administer existing tools and policies and more fully achieve a holistic
housing strategy that focuses on the goals identified in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan and allows the
City to implement new programs to address priority areas identified through this process, additional
staff and financial resources will be important.
1. Housing staff will be necessary to implement and administer existing and new housing policies and
programs. The City of Golden Valley currently does not have a staff member with the primary focus
dedicated to the implementation and administration of housing policies and programs. Current
planning and other Department staff are utilizing part of their time on housing issues in addition to their
regular duties. When looking at surrounding cities and cities of similar size, the majority have dedicated
housing and economic development staff. Most recently, the City of Edina, added housing staff to
increase their capacity to implement tools and strategies to meet their growing housing goals and
priorities. This has been an effective strategy and the City has been successful in implementing new
programs and policies with housing affordability as its focus.
A new staff member to focus on housing in the City could provide the following:
• Key contact person to engage with existing rental property owners of NOAH units regarding
the Tenant Protections Ordinance, 4d Tax Incentive Program and identify other current and
future issues and opportunities in multi-family rental housing. Affordable housing
developers indicate that one of the most important strategies for cities regarding NOAH
housing is to build relationships with owners so that if they are considering selling their
properties that the City could help identify affordable housing buyers with a mission to
maintain current tenants within affordable units. Developing relationships takes time and a
Page 6
key contact person who can navigate resources for owners as well as tenants is an
important strategy.
• Serve as a resource of information to the general public regarding housing issues,
opportunities and services and focus on creating a resource page on the City website.
• Serve as a grant writer for County CDBG funding, MN Housing Challenge Funds,
Metropolitan Council LCDA funding, etc. In addition, be a gatekeeper for developer
request for state tax credits, bonding and other state, regional, county or local funding
opportunities and partnerships.
• Administer notices and provide compliance related to tenant protection ordinance, 4d Tax
Incentive Program, A Fair Housing Policy, and the Mixed Income Housing Policy. Other
cities have indicated that these programs and policies are only as good as the compliance
to assure that what is expected of the owners is being achieved. The compliance requires
additional resources to be effective.
• Implement approved HRA Strategic Plan that could include the following as identified in
three priority areas above:
Work with the community to prioritize properties for smaller lot housing and
increased housing density including allowing accessory dwelling units and
utilization of modular constructed housing.
Research programs for first time buyers and/or lower income purchase programs
such as down payment assistance, lower mortgage interest programs, home
renovation funding and community land trusts.
Identify needs of low income senior owners and research options to assist in the
transition of senior owners wanting to move and younger first time buyers.
Facilitates Housing Improvement Area requests from older common interest
community complexes.
2. Suggested Funding Sources and Financial Strategies to Support an HRA Strategic Plan.
A. Create an HRA Levy – The primary method of financing the delivery and administration of
housing and redevelopment programs in Minnesota is through an HRA Levy. As indicated by
the staff memo dated March 12, 2019, many cities surrounding Golden Valley issue an HRA
levy. There are varied purposes for the use of the HRA levy dollars, but the majority utilize a
portion of the levy to support City staff in administering housing programs and policies. The
benefit of supporting an HRA levy is to provide a dedicated source of funds focused on housing
and redevelopment needs of the City. In addition, an HRA Levy is not subject to local levy limits
and does not constrain the City’s general levy authority for other necessary City services and
infrastructure needs. It is recommended that the City support a levy that would cover the cost
of a new staff member as well as provide an annual contribution toward a Housing Trust Fund
(summarized below) which would deliver program funding such as gap funding for new
projects, home renovation loans, land trusts and/or other identified programs to support
priorities of housing preservation and diversification.
B. Establish a Local Housing Trust Fund – Local Housing Trust Funds (LHTF) are funds established
by a local government by dedicating local public revenue for housing. They provide a
Page 7
consistent, flexible resource for housing within a local jurisdiction. Trust funds help
communities leverage public and private resources and jumpstart projects that draw
investment and jobs. Some of the benefits of a LHTF includes the following:
• Provide a consistent, dedicated revenue stream for housing that is dedicated toward
affordable, workforce, or other special housing needs; the majority are funded through a
local HRA Levy but can also receive private donations, grant funds, conduit bonding fees,
tax increment proceeds, etc.
• Serves as local leverage for affordable housing programs and developments. The MN State
Legislature is considering providing seed capital to cities who establish a local Housing
Trust Fund.
• Serves as an economic multiplier by supporting investments in housing construction and
rehabilitation, including redevelopment of sites, adding to the tax base and creating jobs.
C. Establish and/or modify the City’s Public Subsidy Policy. A public subsidy policy is important
to ensure that the City leaders are accountable to their residents with regards to how public
resources are utilized. A public subsidy policy should clearly outline the goals and objectives of
providing public funds for housing and redevelopment and should include policies related to
use of an HRA Levy (if adopted), Tax Increment Financing, Tax Abatement and any funds
accepted and utilized to fund a Housing Trust Fund if pursued. One of the main frustrations of
the development community is uncertainty which increases their risk, thereby increasing the
cost of a project. Having a clear, strong public finance policy that outlines the goals and
objectives of the City sends a strong message to the development community regarding the
methods that you are willing to support and partner to achieve your community goals.
HRA Feedback and Discussion Requested
The next step in the process is to prepare a draft Golden Valley HRA Strategic Plan. Prior to drafting a plan,
BCC is requesting feedback on the identified priorities and suggested recommendations. At the meeting on
March 10, 2020, summary information will be presented that is referenced in this memo. Feedback from
the HRA on these options will help in crafting a draft strategic plan and provide a path for implementation.
Attachment Referenced:
• Summary of Local Housing Trust Fund
Local Housing Trust Funds (LHTF) are funds established by a local
government by dedicating local public revenue for housing. They are a
consistent, exible resource for housing within a local jurisdiction.
Trust funds help communities leverage public and private resources
and jumpstart projects that draw investment and jobs. LHTFs enable
communities to prioritize developments that maximize benet to the
local community.
The Local Housing Trust Fund Manual for Minnesota was developed by
the Minnesota Housing Partnership. Its purpose is to provide an
in-depth discussion of the various decisions to be made by local
Minnesota communities in establishing an LHTF including revenue,
programming, and policies. With 80 pages of references, case studies,
and explainers, the manual is an in-depth guide to help local
communities get LHTFs established.
What is the Local Housing Trust Fund Manual for
Minnesota?
On average, city housing trust funds
leverage $6 in additional public and
private funds for every $1 the trust
fund invests.
Benefits of Local Housing Trust Funds
Encourage local contributions
Establish dedicated sources of revenue
Leverage private dollars
Provide flexibility to meet local needs
What is a Local Housing Trust Fund?
Local Housing Trust Fund Manual for Minnesota
Established in 2015, Red Wing
invests $100,000 annually into
their Aordable Housing Trust
Fund (AHTF). Tax Increment
Financing will soon provide an
additional investment of up to
$100,000 annually for 25 years.
To date, the AHTF has provided
homebuyer assistance loans to at
least six families.
The City of Minneapolis created its
Aordable Housing Trust Fund
(AHTF) in 2003. As a direct result of
the AHTF the city tax base has
expanded by up to $800 million,
leveraging $9 for every dollar
invested in the fund.
Red Wing Minneapolis
$6leveraged
$1invested
Goodhue County
Goodhue County and the
Southeastern Minnesota
Multi-County Housing and
Redevelopment Authority started
an Aordable Housing Trust Fund
(AHTF) in 2018. The fund provides
downpayment assistance, a fund for
multi-family housing projects, and a
exible fund.
Get the Manual
To download a copy of the LHTF Manual for Minnesota, visit:
www.mhponline.org/community-development/lhtfmanual-minnesota
Questions?
Contact Elizabeth Glidden, MHP’s Director of Strategic Initiatives &
Policy at elizabeth.glidden@mhponline.org or 651-925-5548
Minnesota Housing Partnership
TOP IN-DEMAND JOBS
in the Twin Cities
Median
annual income
Affordable
housing costs per
month3
% income needed to
pay median rent in
Golden Valley
Golden Valley median renter $39,296 $982 38%
Minimum wage earner 4 $20,509 $513 72%
Food Prep / Serving Workers $24,190 $605 61%
Cashiers $24,643 $616 60%
Retail Salespersons $26,029 $651 57%
Personal Care Aides $26,766 $669 55%
Stock Clerks / Order Fillers $29,957 $749 49%
Janitors $31,228 $781 47%
Nursing Assistants $36,729 $918 40%
Supervisors of Food Prep $39,064 $977 38%
Customer Service Representatives $40,281 $1,007 37%
Truck Drivers $52,246 $1,309 28%
Registered Nurses $86,042 $2,151 17%
Software Developers $98,421 $ 2,461 15%
Housing is affordable
when a household pays
no more than 30% of
its monthly income on
rent or mortgage.
To afford the median rent ($1,231) in
Golden Valley, a full time worker would
need to earn $49,240 per year -- far
above the wages of many of
the most in-demand jobs in
the region (see table to the
right).
In Golden Valley, 45%
of renter households —
and 53% of senior
renter households —
pay more than they can
afford on housing.
SOURCES: Occupational Data for Twin Cities Economic Development Region by MN Department of Employment and Economic Development, July 2019,
and American Community Survey, 2018 estimates. FOOTNOTES: 1- Adjusted for inflation. 2- Vacancy data from CoStar. 3- Housing is affordable when it
consumes no more than 30% of a household’s monthly income. 4- Based on current minimum wage for large employers in Minnesota ($9.86).
MEDIAN RENT1 IN GOLDEN VALLEY increased 20% from 2010
to 2018. In 2018, the overall median rent was $1,231. Over
that same time frame, the vacancy rate declined by 39%, falling
from 8.9 percent to 5.4 percent.2
GOLDEN VALLEY RENTER SNAPSHOT
Housing impacts every aspect of our lives, from the jobs we can access to the educational outcomes of our kids.
But too many people in our community pay too much for housing, forcing hard-working families to choose
between paying the rent or buying adequate groceries, covering healthcare and other critical needs. Across
the Twin Cities region, even those employed full time in the most in-demand jobs can’t make ends meet with
rising rents and declining vacancy rates.
Learn more at
mhponline.org
In Golden Valley, 70% of rental housing
was built prior to 1990.
386164v2 SJB KG400-12
COMPARISON OF HRA AND EDA ENTITIES IN MINNESOTA
Cities have authority to aid and cooperate in the planning, construction, or operation of
economic development, redevelopment and affordable housing projects. These can be done
through various government organizations. The predominant method of delivering and
administering housing and redevelopment programs in Minnesota is through a legal public
entity, accountable to city government. Since 1947 a city in Minnesota may establish this public
agency, often a Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) (MN Stat. 460.001 to 469.047),
of which there are more than 230 in Minnesota. An HRA is a public corporation with power to
undertake certain types of housing and redevelopment or renewal activities. While state
legislation conveys authority for HRAs in each City, it is up to the City Council to formally
establish an HRA before it can do business and use its powers. In addition to carrying out
redevelopment efforts, HRAs are often the affordable housing entity that provides decent and
safe rental housing for eligible low and moderate income families, the elderly and persons with
disabilities. HRA activities can lead to reinvestment in commercial neighborhoods through
acquisition, demolition and rehabilitation.
In 1986 the Minnesota Legislative passed legislation (MN Stat. 469.090 to 469.1082)
authorizing cities to establish formal Economic Development Authorities (EDAs) to promote
local economic growth. An EDA is a legal entity created by a City to facilitate a well-rounded
development program by taking advantage of various powers granted to other development
entities, including port authorities and HRAs. By combining these powers, community leaders
are able to create flexible business assistance and development programs. EDAs are allowed to
buy and sell property, make loans and grants to businesses, provide loan guarantees and to sell
bonds, subject to various limitations and conditions.
Housing Redevelopment Authorities Economic Development Authorities
HRAs have two missions: to identify,
eliminate and prevent the emergence of blight;
and to facilitate development of housing
affordable to low and moderate income
persons. A blighted area is one with buildings
and areas that are detrimental to the health,
safety and welfare of the community because
of dilapidation, obsolescence, and certain other
factors. The HRA may then provide for
improvements or redevelopment of these areas
through a redevelopment plan. Regarding,
affordable housing, the HRA determines what
income limits are “low and moderate” (though
many state and federal programs also set
limits). HRAs may then take any action to
facilitate, or even construct and own, housing
for income-eligible persons. The area of
The overall purpose of an EDA is to promote
economic development, using some specific
powers granted to EDAs (some of which are
similar to port authority powers), as well as all
the powers of an HRA and of a city under the
municipal development district statute. EDAs
may exercise powers in an “economic
development district”, or may create
redevelopment projects or housing
development projects (acting as an HRA) or
development districts (acting as a city). In
other words, an EDA can act as an HRA as
well as use broader powers to stimulate
economic development that is not directly
related to either blight or affordable housing.
386164v2 SJB KG400-12
operation of a city HRA is the corporate limits
of the City.
Governing Body: Governing Body:
Activities are controlled by a board of
commissioners. An HRA consists of five
commissioners who are residents of the city.
The Mayor appoints and the Council approves
the members who serve five-year, staggered
terms. City Councilmembers often serve on
the HRA. The entire membership of an HRA
may consist of councilmembers. The City
Council must approve broad “redevelopment
plans” for projects, but otherwise most HRA
activities do not require council approval
(unless that is required by some other statute,
such as approval of TIF Plans under the TIF
Act).
An HRA is a separate political subdivision; it
is not just part of the City. The HRA does
have the power to levy a tax (with a specified
limit), which is separate from the City tax levy,
though the City Council must approve that
levy.
EDA is created through an enabling resolution
written and approved by City Council.
The City Council can choose to serve as the
EDA Board of Commissioners or create a
board composed of a cross-section of the
community. If non-council members sit on the
Board, the size must be 3, 5, or 7
Commissioners appointed by the Mayor with
the approval of City Council. If the Board has
3 members, at least one must be a City Council
member; if the Board has 5 or 7 members, at
least 2 must be City Council members. Board
members serve for six-year terms, or their term
as Councilmembers if they are on the City
Council.
The City Council may control the activities of
the EDA by limiting its powers under the
enabling resolution and through the annual
approval of the EDA budget.
Activities: Activities:
1. May establish a redevelopment project
for the elimination and prevention of
blighted areas.
2. Acquire real or personal property for
activities related to projects. May sell
its lands and properties to private or
public parties.
3. May provide for the administration of a
commercial building loan program to
preserve small-sized buildings in its
district.
4. May sell real or personal property,
including the use of eminent domain,
for project-related purposes (though
2006 reform severely limits this
power).
5. May act as federal government agent in
carrying out provisions of Municipal
Housing and Redevelopment Act.
6. May exercise the powers granted to
1. Acquire property for creation of
economic development districts.
2. Sell or lease land whether by private or
public means.
3. Carry out EDA law to develop and
improve land within the district. The
EDA may make any necessary
arrangements to make land suitable for
development.
4. Exercise eminent domain (subject to
severe limits of 2006 reform).
5. Enter into contracts for the purpose of
economic development.
6. Purchase all materials needed to carry
out development.
7. May make loans to a business, a for-
profit or nonprofit organization, or an
individual. The loan must be for an
authorized purpose (e.g., carry out
economic development).
386164v2 SJB KG400-12
redevelopment agencies under Minn.
Stat. §§469.152 to 469.1651
7. Provide relocation payments and
assistance in accordance with federal
guidelines.
8. May make loans to carry out
redevelopment or affordable housing
mission.
9. May issue revenue bonds secured by
specified revenues; may issue bonds
secured by City’s full faith and credit
(and without election) only for certain
HRA-owned affordable rental housing
projects, with City Council approval
and subject to certain limits.
10. May become member or shareholder in
LLP, LLC or corporation for purpose of
carrying out housing and housing
development projects.
11. May levy tax for redevelopment or
affordable housing programs, with
Council approval, and not to exceed
.0185 percent of market value in the
City. This tax is outside City levy
limits.
12. May employ staff and an executive
director.
8. Engage in research to determine factors
of specified development projects.
9. May be a limited partner in a
partnership whose purpose is consistent
with the EDA’s purpose.
10. May invest in certain small businesses
by providing equity and venture capital,
subject to certain limits.
11. May employ staff and an executive
director.
12. May request the City to levy tax for the
EDA, not to exceed .01812 percent of
market value in the City; this tax is
within City levy limits (if any apply).
13. EDA may also use its HRA powers,
and levy the HRA tax for
redevelopment and housing purposes,
as described under the HRA summary;
again, with Council approval. This tax
is outside City levy limits.
14. May issue revenue bonds secured by
specified revenues. May issue GO
bonds secured by City full faith and
credit only with election, and with
Council approval.
Golden Valley Housing and Redevelopment Work Session
March 10, 2020
Agenda Item
2. HRA Levy and Budget
Prepared By
Sue Virnig, Finance Director
Summary
The Golden Valley Housing and Redevelopment Authority is granted power to levy and collect taxes (MN
Statutes, Section 469.033, subd. 6) subject to a resolution of consent from the Golden Valley City
Council. Hennepin County requires a resolution before programming for the special levy.
In October 2019, the HRA had approved $30,000 for the 2020 Budget. Any unspent monies will be
accounted for in the Housing Fund. Starting in January 2020, the fund had $105,695 available.
Staff is recommending the following HRA meetings to discuss and consider a $165,000 levy for housing:
March 10 HRA Work Session to discuss program and levy
April 21 HRA Meeting to approve Intent for HRA Levy
September 15 Special HRA Meeting to consider preliminary HRA Levy and Budget
December 1 Special HRA Meeting to Adopt HRA Levy and Budget
In August, the City Council will begin meeting to discuss the City’s 2021-2022 Proposed Biennial Budget
and 2021-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP). The 2021 Concept General Fund Levy is $20,497,850
and Debt Levy is $5,957,055 for a total of $26,454,905. This is an increase of $1,381,871 from 2020.
Hennepin County will release pay 2021 property values at the end of March. The impact on the taxpayer
will be reviewed with the budget process.
Financial Or Budget Considerations
The HRA Levy and Budget for $165,000 will be approximately $11.55 in property taxes on the median
home. Because this is a first time levy, fiscal disparities and tax delinquencies will be applied but not
known at this time. The first-half payment will be received in July 2021. This levy shows up under Other
Levies on the Proposed Tax Statement.
Supporting Documents
• Resolution Approving Intent for HRA Levy For a Housing Program (1 page)
• 2021-22 HRA Proposed Budget (3 pages)
o Revenues, Expenditures, Fund Balance
• 2020 Schedule for 2021-2022 Proposed Biennial Budget and 2021-2030 CIP (1 page)
HRA RESOUTION NO.
RESOLUTION APPROVING INTENT FOR HRA LEVY
FOR A HOUSING PROGRAM
WHEREAS, The Golden Valley Housing and Redevelopment Authority (the “HRA”)
has authorities and powers according to MN Statutes, Sections 469.001 to 469.047. MS
Statutes, Section 469.033, subd. 6 grants the HRA the power to levy and collect taxes
subject to a resolution of consent from the Golden Valley City Council for a set period; and
WHEREAS, The HRA is requesting the City of Golden Valley to approve a consent
to an HRA tax levy payable in 2021 for an amount of $165,000. The HRA discussed the
levy and budget on March 10, 2020, at an HRA Work Session.
BE IT RESOLVED by the HRA that the appropriations for the Housing Program
Fund for the calendar year 2021 as follows:
2021 Preliminary Budget is as follows:
HRA Housing Program Fund Tax Levy Revenues $165,000
HRA Housing Fund Balance $3,000
HRA Housing Program Fund Expenditures $162,000
__________________________
Larry Fonnest, Chair
ATTEST:
________________________________
Timothy J. Cruikshank, Executive Director
.
Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent
Revenue Amount of Total Amount of Total Amount of Total Amount of Total Amount of Total Amount of Total Amount of Total
Property Tax Revenue $0 0.0%$0 0.0%$0 $0 $0 $165,000 100.0%$165,000 100.0%
Interest Earnings 397 100.0%1,442 100.0%0 0 0 0.0%0 0.0%
TOTALS $397 100.0%$1,442 100.0%$0 0.0%$0 0.0%$0 0.0%$165,000 100.0%$165,000 100.0%
CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY
Housing Fund
REVENUE DETAIL
Concept 2022Concept 2021Actual 2018 Actual 2019 Adopted 2020 Estimated 2020 Proposed 2021
DIVISION: Housing (016)PROGRAM: Housing (9190)
2018 2019 2020 2020 2021 2021 2022
OBJECT DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL ADOPTED ESTIMATED CONCEPT PROPOSED CONCEPT
Personal Services
6110 Salaries-Regular Employees $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $109,400 $112,685
6150 Employee Insurance - - - - - 18,305 18,425
6160 Retirement - - - - - 18,545 19,100
TOTAL Personal Services - - - - - 146,250 150,210
Supplies and Services
6320 Operating Supplies - - - - - 250 250
6340 Professional Services - - 30,000 30,000 - 10,000 10,000
6344 Use of Personal Auto - - - - 500 500
6411 Conferences and Schools - - - - 3,000 3,000
6413 Dues and Subscriptions - - - - 2,000 2,000
TOTAL Supplies and Services - - 30,000 30,000 - 15,750 15,750
TOTALS - - 30,000 30,000 - 162,000 165,960
CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY
2021 - 2022 OPERATING BUDGET
Fund Balance @ 01/01/20 $105,695
Adopted Revenue - 2020 0
Adopted Expenses - 2020 30,000
Excess of Revenue Over (Under) Expenses (30,000)
Estimated Fund Balance @ 12/31/20*$75,695
Proposed Revenue - 2021 165,000
Proposed Expenses - 2021 162,000
Excess of Revenue Over (Under) Expenses 3,000
Projected Fund Balance @ 12/31/21*$78,695
Concept Revenue - 2022 165,000
Concept Expenses - 2022 165,960
Excess of Revenue Over (Under) Expenses (960)
Projected Fund Balance @ 12/31/22*$77,735
CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY
HOUSING FUND
Fund Balance
2020 Schedule for 2021-2022 Proposed Biennial Budget and 2021-2030 CIP
May-July
Staff Meetings preparing proposed budget
Week of August 3-7
Review 2021-2022 General Fund Budget with each council member and mayor
August 12
Review 2021-2022 General Fund Budget
September 2-4
Review 2021-2022 Other Funds Budget and CIP with each council member and mayor
September 8-Council Manager Meeting
Review all other funds budgets (Enterprise, Special Revenue, and Internal Service Funds)
Review 2021 2030 Capital Improvement Program
Review 2020 Proposed Levy and Tax Impact
September 15-Council Meeting
Proposed Property Tax Hearing (Amount approved will go on notice for November)
December 1-Council Meeting
Property Tax Hearing –Adopt Budget and Levy
Golden Valley Housing and Redevelopment Work Session
March 10, 2020
Agenda Item
3. Fair Housing Policy
Prepared By
Myles Campbell, Planner
Summary
Staff has prepared a draft Fair Housing Policy that would establish new standards of practice for future
work around housing within the City of Golden Valley. The purpose of the policy is to encourage better
and more equitable housing outcomes for all City residents and community members. Fair Housing
Policies are becoming more common throughout the metro as communities begin to understand the
importance of providing equitable access to housing, as well as the repercussions of historical
discriminatory housing practices. As a basis for this draft policy, staff consulted the existing and
adopted policies of peer cities such as Edina, Bloomington, Hopkins, Minnetonka and Plymouth.
The proposed policy would further the HRA’s goal of adopting policies that promote access to fair and
equal housing to all people. The policy contains both external and internal facing responsibilities, each
of which are addressed in turn below.
External Facing Responsibilities in the Policy
Under the proposed policy, staff would be responsible for receiving and responding to inquiries from
the public about fair housing issues and directing the public to the appropriate state or federal
agencies for additional information or to file a complaint. Staff’s role would be informational only. To
effectively carry out these responsibilities, the responsible staff members will require training.
At the outset, Planning Department staff will carry out the duties required by the policy. If the HRA
hires additional staff to manage housing related initiatives, these responsibilities will shift to HRA staff.
Internal Facing Responsibilities in the Policy
The proposed policy contains several commitments that will be carried out internally by staff. Some
examples include reviewing City code to identify potential disparate impacts, and evaluating the
impact of housing related grant dollars in the City.
Timing
Staff feels the timing is right for the adoption of this policy for a number of reasons. First, the City
committed to adopting a Fair Housing Policy in its grant agreement and application for the Capacity
Building Grant from Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (MHFA). Second, many federally funded
HRA Work Session Executive Summary
City of Golden Valley
March 10, 2020
2
programs such as Livable Communities Development Account, require Cities to adopt a Fair Housing
Policy to be eligible for funds.
Finally, adopting this policy now makes sense given the HRA’s interest in hiring additional staff to carry
out its housing initiatives. This policy will allow City staff to continue to develop its expertise in the area
of housing, putting staff in a better position to advise the HRA on other housing related initiatives.
Although the policy requires additional hours from Planning Department staff, that impact would be
mitigated if the HRA hires additional housing staff.
Financial Or Budget Considerations
The Fair Housing Policy will not require a specific budget outside of staff hours. The Fair Housing Policy
is a requirement for some grant sources the City may wish to pursue in the future.
Recommended Action
Staff requests feedback from HRA members as to the language and content of the proposed Fair
Housing Policy, with the intention of bringing it to a vote at the April HRA Meeting.
Supporting Documents
• Draft Fair Housing Policy (2 pages)
Golden Valley Housing & Redevelopment Authority
Fair Housing Policy
I. Purpose and Vision
It is the policy and commitment of the City of Golden Valley, through its Housing and Redevelopment
Authority, to ensure that fair and equal housing opportunities are available to all persons in all housing
opportunities and development activities funded by the City regardless of race, color, religion, gender,
sexual orientation, marital status, status with regard to public assistance, creed, familial status, national
origin, age, or disability. Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act establishes federal policy for providing fair housing
throughout the United States. The intent of Title VIII is to assure equal housing opportunities for all
people.
The Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Golden Valley (the “HRA”) is dedicated
to advancing inclusion and equity for all residents by developing this Fair Housing Policy to further the
goal of creating a safe, healthy, and accessible community where all residents will thrive.
The HRA is also committed to upholding the federal Fair Housing Act and the Minnesota Human Rights
Act, both of which prevent discriminatory practices in housing. As a recipient of federal community
development funds under Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, the City,
through its HRA certifies that it will affirmatively further fair housing.
II. External Practices
a. Intake and Referral
The HRA has designated the HRA Director or their designee as the responsible authority for
the intake and referral of all fair housing inquiries. At a minimum, the responsible staff
member will be trained in state and federal fair housing laws, the complaint process for filing
discrimination complaints under state and federal law, and the state and federal agencies that
handle such complaints. The HRA will document the date, time, and nature of the fair housing
inquiries it receives and any referrals given in response to such inquires. The responsible staff
person will maintain relevant supporting information according to the HRA’s Document
Retention Schedule. The HRA may use the information collected to inform their decisions with
respect to programs, policies, issues, and concerns relating to fair housing.
b. Meaningful Access
i. Online Information
The HRA will clearly display information about fair housing on its website. The website
will include links to various fair housing resources, including the Department of Housing
and Urban Development, Minnesota Department of Human Rights and others as well as
links to state and federal fair housing complaint forms.
ii. In-Person Information
The HRA will provide in-person fair housing information to community members
including:
• A list of fair housing enforcement agencies;
• Frequently asked questions regarding fair housing law; and
•Fair housing complaint forms for enforcement agencies.
c.Languages
The HRA is committed to providing information in the native language of its community
members. The HRA will provide information in languages other than English to individuals
with limited English proficiency.
III.Internal Practices
The HRA commits to the following steps to promote awareness and competency regarding fair
housing issues in all of its government functions.
a.Training. The HRA will train its staff and officials on fair housing considerations.
b.Housing Analysis. The HRA will review its housing stock periodically to examine the
affordability of both rental and owner-occupied housing to inform future HRA actions.
c.Code Analysis. The HRA will review its municipal code periodically, with specific focus on
ordinances related to zoning, building, and occupancy standards, to identify any potential for
disparate impact or treatment.
d.Project Planning and Analysis. HRA planning functions and development review will consider
housing issues, including whether potential projects may perpetuate segregation or lead to
displacement of protected classes.
e.Community Engagement. The HRA will seek input from underrepresented populations in the
community. Conversations regarding fair housing, development, zoning, and land use changes
may be facilitated by the City or the HRA.
f.Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing. As a recipient of federal funds, the HRA agrees to
participate in the Regional Analysis of Impediments, as organized by the regional Fair Housing
Implementation Council (FHIC), an ad hoc coalition of Community Development Block Grant
(CDBG) entitlement jurisdictions and others working together to affirmatively further fair
housing. The HRA will review the recommendations from the analysis and, where appropriate,
recommend integration into City planning documents, including the Consolidated Plan, the
Comprehensive Plan, and other related documents.