The URL can be used to link to this page

05-12-20 Council/Manager Agenda Packet REGULAR MEETING AGENDA This meeting will be held via Cisco Webex in accordance with the local emergency declaration made by the City under Minn. Stat. § 12.37. The public may monitor this meeting by calling 1-415- 655-0001 and entering the meeting code 287 831 488. For technical assistance, please contact support staff at 763-593-8007 or webexsupport@goldenvalleymn.gov. If you incur costs to call into the meeting, you may submit the costs to the City for reimbursement consideration. Additional information about for monitoring electronic meetings is available on the City website. Pages 1. Boards/Commissions 2019 Annual Report and 2020 Work Plan A. Environmental Commission 2-9 B. Planning Commission 10-21 C. Board of Zoning Appeals 22-35 2. Discussion on Membership to Municipal Legislative Commission 36 3. Letter of Support for Bassett Creek Regional Trail Alignment 37-91 4. Financial Impact of COVID-19 Revenues and Expenditures 92-96 5. Council Review of Future Draft Agendas: City Council May 19, City Council June 2, Housing and Redevelopment Authority Work Session June 9 and Council/Manager June 9, 2020 97-101 Council/Manager meetings have an informal, discussion-style format and are designed for the Council to obtain background information, consider policy alternatives, and provide general directions to staff. No formal actions are taken at these meetings. The public is invited to attend Council/Manager meetings and listen to the discussion; public participation is allowed by invitation of the City Council. May 12, 2020 – 6:30 pm Golden Valley Council/Manager Meeting May 12, 2020 Agenda Item 1. A. Environmental Commission 2019 Annual Report and 2020 Work Plan Prepared By Eric Eckman, Environmental Resources Supervisor Scott Seys, Chair, Environmental Commission Summary The Environmental Commission has completed an annual report summarizing its 2019 accomplishments and outlining its proposed work plan priorities for 2020. The Chair of the Environmental Commission, Scott Seys, will present a summary of the report at the May 12, 2020 Council/Manager meeting. The annual report is attached for reference. Following discussion of this item, Council direction on the Environmental Commission’s 2020 Work Plan is requested. Financial Or Budget Considerations Not applicable Supporting Documents Environmental Commission 2019 Annual Report & 2020 Work Plan (7 pages) ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION 2019 ANNUAL REPORT AND 2020 WORK PLAN Golden Valley Environmental Commission 2019 Annual Report 2 2019 Environmental Commission Commissioners Scott Seys, Chair (2021) Debra Yahle, Vice-Chair (2022) Tracy Anderson (2020) Tonia Galonska (2022) Dawn Hill (2021) Susan Phelps (2020) Jim Stremel (2020) Joseph Ramlet, Student (2020) Note: Terms run May 1-April 30 Council Liaison Larry Fonnest City Staff Eric Eckman, Environmental Resources Supervisor Drew Chirpich , Environmental Specialist Carrie Nelson, Engineering Assistant Emma Pierson, MN GreenCorps Member Purpose and Mission The Environmental Commission has been established to advise and make recommendations to the City Council in matters relating to and affecting the environment. Golden Valley Environmental Commission 2019 Annual Report 3 Table of Contents 2019 Accomplishments page 4 2020 Proposed Work Plan page 6 Golden Valley Environmental Commission 2019 Annual Report 4 2019 Accomplishments GreenStep Cities Completed Step 4 of the GreenStep Cities Program, including metrics and measures in the following topic areas: o buildings and lighting o renewable energy o land use o transportation and fleet o surface water o green buildings A link to the summary of the Golden Valley’s GreenStep Cities progress is located at https://greenstep.pca.state.mn.us/ cityInfo.cfm?ctu_code=2394924 Energy Use Researched and recommended participation in Xcel Energy’s Partners In Energy community collaboration program. Pollinators Approved and recommended to Council the adoption of a resolution endorsing pollinator protection and promoting pollinator habitat. Created a prioritization matrix of potential pollinator plots and habitat sites to develop in the community in the next several years. Solid Waste And Recycling Provided input and feedback on the City’s solid waste hauling discussion. Worked with MN GreenCorps Member to complete GreenStep Cities actions related to waste reduction, recycling, and composting/organics management. Natural Resources Management Hosted an educational workshop on sustainable yards and soils. Supported the Bassett Creek Nature Area Habitat Restoration Project made possible by a grant from the MnDNR. Provided guidance and received updates on the City’s work to resolve encroachments in the Bassett Creek Nature Area. Council Member Gillian Rosenquist accepted Golden Valley’s GreenStep Cities Step 4 designation in June. Photo by GreenStep Cities ) Golden Valley Environmental Commission 2019 Annual Report 5 Sustainability And Resilience Researched and made recommendations on zoning code revisions to remove barriers to local food production. Continued support of the City’s flood reduction and mitigation efforts through its projects, programs, and participation in the FEMA Community Rating System, which provides discounts on flood insurance in exchange for the City’s high level of floodplain management actions. The City moved up from Class 7 to Class 6 in 2019. DeCola Pond A is a component of the City’s Flood Plain Mitigation Plan. Golden Valley Environmental Commission 2019 Annual Report 6 2020 Proposed Work Plan Proposed work plan priorities for 2020 are based on goals in the Resilience & Sustainability, Water Resources, and Parks & Natural Resources chapters of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, the GreenStep Cities Program, and the City’s participation in Xcel Energy’s Partners in Energy Community Collaboration Program. Curbside Organics Collection Continue to explore options and provide information/recommendation to the City Council; assist in developing and implementing a new organics program Xcel Energy’s Partners In Energy Program Help guide and participate in the development and implementation of the City’s Energy Action Plan including: o advance building performance (supporting City’s efforts to update building codes or standards that advance energy performance in buildings) o energy benchmarking in private buildings GreenStep Cities Step 5: Continue working on actions and metrics to address climate-related impacts, improve the environment, and reduce energy consumption and costs. o If awarded a MN GreenCorps Member in 2020-2021, work to complete GreenStep Cities actions related to Climate and Energy Action. Community Outreach: Use the Commission’s $3,500 budget to: o fund a joint project, speaker, or event with the Human Rights Commission o host an educational workshop on sustainable yards and pollinator habitat approximately $1,500 for Metro Blooms Workshop #3 in a series of 3) o administer a student essay competition Climate Justice and Environmental Justice: Partner with Human Rights Commission on joint project, event, or speaker. May require joint meeting. Ties in well with City’s Resilience and Sustainability Plan. Potential ideas for collaboration include: o hosting a speaker on climate justice and environmental justice focusing on climate adaptation and resilience or promoting community gardens and local food production o sponsoring a project in an area of the City with inequities of green space and amenities, or pairing a community event with planting trees and vegetation in that area The City partnered with the Golden Valley Garden Club to plant a pollinator garden in the City Hall parking lot. (photo by Joanie Clausen) Golden Valley Environmental Commission 2019 Annual Report 7 Zero-Waste Community: Assist the City in hosting a community event in 2020. Natural Resources Management Plan: Continue to assist in implementation of the plan, including: o exploring the potential to revise City Code to allow temporary use of goats for vegetation management on public and private properties o providing an update on Emerald Ash Borer Management o supporting habitat restoration in the Pennsylvania Woods Nature Area in 2020-21 with DNR Grant funds Downtown Redevelopment Study: Engage in environmental aspects of the study and plan Pollinators: Complete actions listed in the City’s Pollinator Protection resolution, such as: o doing an inventory and reducing the use of chemicals on City properties o developing more plots and habitat in the community Air Quality: Review City code with respect to wood burning and update as needed to protect and maintain local air quality. Recycling: Reduce single use plastics and containers. Golden Valley Council/Manager Meeting May 12, 2020 Agenda Item 1. B. Planning Commission 2019 Annual Report and 2020 Work Plan Prepared By Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager Summary The Planning Commission Chair, Ron Blum, will be in attendance to provide a review of the work completed by the Commission in 2019 and to discuss issues related to planning for 2020 and beyond. Financial Or Budget Considerations Not applicable Supporting Documents Planning Commission – 2019 Annual Report and 2020 Work Plan (11 pages) PLANNING COMMISSION 2019 ANNUAL REPORT AND 2020 WORK PLAN Golden Valley Planning Commission 2019 Annual Report 2 2019 Planning Commission Commissioners Ronald Blum, Chair Andy Johnson, Vice Chair Adam Brookins, Secretary Rich Baker Lauren Pockl Ryan Sadeghi Chuck Segelbaum Ari Prohofsky, Youth Council Liaison Steve Schmidgall City Staff Marc Nevinski, Physical Development Director Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager Emily Goellner, Senior Planner/Grant Writer Myles Campbell, Planner Emily Anderson, Planning Intern Lisa Wittman, Administrative Assistant Purpose, Mission, and Prescribed Duties The Planning Commission shall: Review and make recommendations on specific development proposals made by private developers and public agencies. Review and make recommendations on proposed rezonings, subdivision plans, amendments to the zoning text, platting regulations and variances, and similar items having to do with administration and regulatory measures. Conduct special studies dealing with items such as renewal, civic design, maintenance of a suitable living and working environment, economic conditions, etc. These studies may be conducted at the initiative of the Planning Commission and/or specific direction from the City Council. Review major public capital improvement plans against the policy and goals stated in the Comprehensive Plan for the area. Advise and make recommendations relative to housing, new development, and redevelopment projects proposed by the HRA prior to the final commitment of such projects by the HRA. Advise and make recommendations in matters relating to and affecting the environment. Golden Valley Planning Commission 2019 Annual Report 3 Table Of Contents 2019 Overview page 4 2020 Proposed Work Plan page 11 Golden Valley Planning Commission 2019 Annual Report 4 2019 Overview The Golden Valley Planning Commission saw a drop-off in the number of applications it reviewed in 2019, which resulted in a five-year low. Almost all of the projects reviewed were Conditional Use Permits (or an amendment to an existing CUP). They ranged from approval of a boathouse on Sweeney Lake to the establishment of a new adult day care off Nevada Ave N. The Commission also approved a lot consolidation of a residential property with a piece of excess MnDOT right-of-way and performed a site plan review for the parking lot of the Good Day Café/Metropolitan Ballroom. A large number of meetings were taken up with the discussion of three new zoning text amendments. The Commission recommended approval of firearms sales restrictions (which created buffers around certain Institutional and Residential uses), approval of architectural and materials standards for projects in most zoning districts, and approval of a revised Mixed Use Zoning District to replace the I-394 Mixed Use Zoning District. Looking ahead, the Commission will be tasked with reviewing a number of rezonings necessary to bring the City’s zoning map into conformance with the recently adopted 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The Commission will also be asked to review a range of updates to the zoning chapter in order to modernize use tables and adjust to new technologies such as emerging small cell telecommunications equipment. 2019 Activity The information below attempts to capture in figures and graphs the activities of the Planning Commission over the past year. Planning Commission Meetings Held: 19 Cancelled: 5 Zoning Text Amendments Considered 3 Staff-Led Discussions/Presentations 19 Golden Valley Planning Commission 2019 Annual Report 5 7 1 Planning Applications Considered Recommended Approval Recommended Denial 0 5 10 15 20 25 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Total Planning Applications by Year Golden Valley Planning Commission 2019 Annual Report 6 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Site Plan Review Land Use Change Rezoning Platting Variance (Subdivision) CUP/Amend PUD/Major Amend Planning Applications by Type (2019) 0 2 4 6 8 10 Site Plan Review Land Use Change Rezoning Platting Variance (Subdivision) CUP/Amend PUD/Major Amend Planning Applications by Type (5 years) 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 0 1,800 3,600900Feet IPrintDate: 4/16/2020Sources:- Hennepin County Surveyors Office for Property Lines (2020).- City of Golden Valley for all other layers. PlanningApplication Years, 2015 - 2019 A Location Year 2019: 8 2018: 24 2017: 14 2016: 21 2015: 18 0 1,800 3,600900Feet IPrintDate: 4/16/2020Sources:- Hennepin County Surveyors Office for Property Lines (2020).- City of Golden Valley for all other layers. PlanningApplication Types, 2015 - 2019 A Location Type PUD/M ajor Amend: 16 CUP: 30 Variance (Subdivision): 1 Platting (Subdivision/LotConsolidation): 14 Rezoning: 13 Land Use Change: 9 Site Plan Review: 2 Golden Valley Planning Commission 2019 Annual Report 9 Zoning Text Amendments Considered Item Description Firearm Sales Limits the sale or repair of firearms to the Light Industrial and Industrial Zoning Districts and requires buffers from various residential and institutional uses Architectural and Material Standards New section of the zoning chapter that establishes requirements around façades, openings, entrances, and screening, and incorporates a system of material classes Mixed Use Zoning District Replacement of the I-394 Mixed Use Zoning District with a new d istrict that created three new subdistricts, updated the lists of permitted and conditional uses allowed, changed requirements for setbacks and height, and modified impervious and open space regulations Staff Led Discussions/Presentations Annual Commissioner Orientation Zoning Code: 17 Firearm Sales: 1 Architectural and Material Standards: 3 Mixed Use Zoning District: 8 Zoning Study: 2 Narrow Lots: 3 2020-2029 Capital Improvement Program Other PUD Amendments Considered (not reviewed by Planning Commission) Administrative Amendments: 1 Menards Addition PUD 75 – addition of an entrance lane to the yard gate off Hampshire Ave S for customers picking up online orders (APPROVED) Minor Amendments: 3 Valley Creek PUD 71 – amend the amount of signage allowed on the three parcels that make up the office campus (APPROVED) The Xenia PUD 113 – relocate the business center within the building and add one studio unit WITHDRAWN) Golden Hills Business Park PUD 78 – shift allocation of allowed uses from manufacturing to office and make associated parking lot modifications (APPROVED) Golden Valley Planning Commission 2019 Annual Report 10 Major Projects Reviewed Item/Location Type Description American Rug Laundry 8043 Lewis Road CUP Approve a facility for rug cleaning and restoration 1345 Natchez Ave S Lot Consolidation Join excess right-of-way with adjacent residential property 1030 Angelo Drive CUP Allow a boathouse within the Shoreland Overlay District Good Shepard School 145 Jersey Ave S CUP Approve a child care center within an existing elementary school building Golden Valley Adult Day Program 2300 Nevada Ave N CUP Approve a new adult day care operation Borton Volvo 721 Hampshire Ave S CUP Approve an existing business for pre-owned vehicle sales Good Day Café/Metropolitan 5410 Wayzata Blvd Site Plan Review Apply development standards to a proposed parking lot reconfiguration Home Health Care, Inc 800 Boone Ave S CUP Amendment Revision of existing Conditional Use Permit to remove limits on loading and unloading of adult day care clients on Boone Ave Previously Approved Projects that Began Construction in 2019 2015 Central Park West – Phase 2 Apartments (Utica Avenue South) 2016 Central Park West – Phase 1 Office (10 West End) Golden Valley Planning Commission 2019 Annual Report 11 2020 Proposed Work Plan Implementation of 2040 Comprehensive Plan Carry out Phase III of the Downtown Study, including the completion of the city’s Bicycle and Pedestrian Network and a framework for future redevelopment of key properties Adjust Institutional Subdistricts to align with new categories of Assembly, Civic, and Medical; consider creating new Park and Open Space Zoning District Rezone properties to create consistency with the Future Land Use Map Update the Medium-Density Residential (R-3) Zoning District to achieve target densities Zoning Code Amendments/Updates Adopt new restrictions on Tobacco Sales in the Commercial Zoning District Reformat and modernize the tables of Principal, Conditional, Restricted, and Prohibited Uses for each of the City’s zoning districts Revisit the zoning districts in which Places of Worship are allowed in order to be consistent with the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA) Update Telecommunications section of zoning chapter to address small cell telecom equipment Planning Application Review and Evaluation Continue to review and make recommendations on land use applications as they are submitted to the City, including subdivision requests, Conditional Use Permits, and Planned Unit Developments. Commissioner Training and Education Work with staff to explore new and innovative planning concepts and to respond to the interests of individual Commissioners Training on variances provided by the City Attorney Downtown Study Open House Staff photo) Golden Valley Council/Manager Meeting May 12, 2020 Agenda Item 1. C. Board of Zoning Appeals – 2019 Annual Report Prepared By Myles Campbell, Planner Summary The outgoing Board of Zoning Appeals Chair, Nancy Nelson, will be in attendance to provide a review of the work completed by the Board in 2019. Financial Or Budget Considerations Not applicable Supporting Documents Board of Zoning Appeals – 2019 Annual Report (13 pages) BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS 2019 ANNUAL REPORT Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals 2019 Annual Report 2 2019 Board of Zoning Appeals Commissioners Nancy Nelson, Chair (2020) Richard Orenstein, Vice Chair (2020) David Perich (2020) Andy Snope (2020) Rotating Planning Commission Representative Kade Arms-Regenold (Youth Representative, 2020) Note: Terms run May 1-April 30 Council Liaison Larry Fonnest City Staff Marc Nevinski, Physical Development Director Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager Emily Goellner, Associate Planner/Grant Writer Myles Campbell, Planner Emily Anderson, Planning Intern Lisa Wittman, Administrative Assistant Amie Kolesar, Planning Assistant Purpose, Mission, And Prescribed Duties The Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) hears requests for variances from the requirements of the Zoning Code, which is Chapter 113 of the Golden Valley City Code. The BZA consists of five members that meet once a month if there are any petitions pending for action. A Planning Commissioner serves as the fifth member of the BZA. Criteria For Analysis A variance may be granted when the petitioner for the variance establishes that there are practical difficulties in complying with this Chapter. “Practical difficulties,” as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means: the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by this Chapter the plight of the property owner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the property owner the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. The BZA may not grant a variance that would allow any use not allowed for property in the Zoning District where the affected person’s land is located. The BZA may impose conditions in the granting of variances. A condition must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals 2019 Annual Report 3 Table Of Contents 2019 Overview page 4 Five-Year Summary: 2015-2019 page 8 Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals 2019 Annual Report 4 2019 Overview 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 2019 BZA Requests By Type Number of Requests Variances Considered 33 In R-1 Residential Zoning District 30 CITY OF NEW HOPE CITY OF CRYSTAL CITY OF ROBBINSDALE CITY OF MINNEAPOLISCITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK CITY OF MINNEAPOLISCITY OFST. LO UIS PARKCITY OF ROBBINSDALECITY OF CRYSTAL CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK CITY OF NEWHOPECITYOFPLYMOUTHCITY OF MINNEAPOLISCITY OF ST. LOUIS PARKCITY OFPLYMOUTHWinnetka Ave SWinnetka Ave NWinnetka Ave NDouglas Dr NDouglas Dr NMedicine Lake Rd Glenwood AveMendelssohn Ave NPlymouth Ave N 10thAve N Golden Valley Rd7thAveBoone AveNWisconsin Ave NNevada Ave NGeneralMillsBlvdG o ld e n V alleyRdRhodeIslandSandburg Rd Country Club Dr Olympia St Harold AveLaurel Ave Louisiana Ave SJersey AveFloridaAve SGolden Hills DrZane Ave NLindsay St Olson Mem HwyFrontageRd TurnersCrossroadNMeadowLnNNobleAve NHampshireAve SXenia Ave SWayzata Blvd W ayz a ta Blvd Zenith Ave NDecatur Ave NDuluth St G o l d e nValleyRd Be ttyCrockerDr Pennsylvania Ave SWayzata Blvd TheodoreW i r t h Pkw yN Frontage R d LilacDrNAveN!(!(0 1,800 Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals 2019 Annual Report 6 212 9 1 2019 BZA Decisions Approved Approved - Modified Denied Tabled Garage Addition, 7 New Home, 2 Home Addition, 2 Fence , 6 Parking Lot, 2 Deck, 1 Outdoor Lighting, 1 Private Road, 1Paved Area, 1 2019 Proposed Projects Requesting Variances Type Of Project) CITY OF NEW HOPE CITY OF CRYSTAL CITY OF ROBBINSDALE CITY OF MINNEAPOLISCITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK CITY OF MINNEAPOLISCITY OFST. LO UIS PARKCITY OF ROBBINSDALECITY OF CRYSTAL CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK CITY OF NEWHOPECITYOFPLYMOUTHCITY OF MINNEAPOLISCITY OF ST. LOUIS PARKCITY OFPLYMOUTHWinnetka Ave SWinnetka Ave NWinnetka Ave NDouglas Dr NDouglas Dr NMedicine Lake Rd Glenwood AveMendelssohn Ave NPlymouth Ave N 10thAve N Golden Valley Rd7thAveBoone AveNWisconsin Ave NNevada Ave NGeneralMillsBlvdG o ld e n V alleyRdRhodeIslandSandburg Rd Country Club Dr Olympia St Harold AveLaurel Ave Louisiana Ave SJersey AveFloridaAve SGolden Hills DrZane Ave NLindsay St Olson Mem HwyFrontageRd TurnersCrossroadNMeadowLnNNobleAve NHampshireAve SXenia Ave SWayzata Blvd W ayz a ta Blvd Zenith Ave NDecatur Ave NDuluth St G o l d e n ValleyRd Be tty CrockerDrPennsylvania Ave SWayzata Blvd TheodoreW i r t h Pkw yN Frontage Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals 2019 Annual Report 8 Five-Year Summary: 2015-2019 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 Front Setback Side Setback Rear Setback Height Building Envelope Articulation Shoreland Setback Average Grade Accessory Structure Location Accessory Structure Size Paved Area Accessory Structure Height Fence Height Impervious Surface Garage Width Minimum Parking Outdoor Lighting Roadway Width 2015-2019 BZA Requests By Type Variances Considered 127 In R-1 Residential Zoning District 113 In R-2 Residential Zoning District 2 In Commercial Zoning District 2 In Mixed-Use Zoning District 2 In Institutional Zoning District 6 In Industrial Zoning District 1 In Light Industrial Zoning District 1 CITY OF NEW HOPE CITY OF CRYSTAL CITY OF ROBBINSDALE CITY OF MINNEAPOLISCITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK CITY OF MINNEAPOLISCITY OFST. LO UIS PARKCITY OF ROBBINSDALECITY OF CRYSTAL CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK CITY OF NEWHOPECITYOFPLYMOUTHCITY OF MINNEAPOLISCITY OF ST. LOUIS PARKCITY OFPLYMOUTHWinnetka Ave SWinnetka Ave NWinnetka Ave NDouglas Dr NDouglas Dr NMedicine Lake Rd Glenwood AveMendelssohn Ave NPlymouth Ave N 10thAve N Golden Valley Rd7thAveBoone AveNWisconsin Ave NNevada Ave NGeneralMillsBlvdG o ld e n V alleyRdRhodeIslandSandburg Rd Country Club Dr Olympia St Harold AveLaurel Ave Louisiana Ave SJersey AveFloridaAve SGolden Hills DrZane Ave NLindsay St Olson Mem HwyFrontage Rd TurnersCrossroad NMeadow LnNNobleAve NHampshireAve SXenia Ave SWayzata BlvdW ayzataBlvdZenith Ave NDecatur Ave NDuluthStGo l d e n ValleyRd Be tty CrockerDr Pennsylvania Ave SWayzata Blvd TheodoreW i rt hPkw yN Frontage R d LilacDrNAveN!(AcousticsAssociates Lat14 Asian Eatery Christian Life Center Former OptumOffice Site NobleElementarySchool 0 1, 800 3, 600900Feet IPrint Date: 4/22/ 2020Sources:-Hennepin County Surveyors Office forProperty Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals 2019 Annual Report 10 89 3 25 9 1 2015-2019 BZA Decisions Approved Approved - Modified Denied Tabled Withdrawn Garage , 24 Deck, 12 New Home or Building, 11 Front Porch, 3 Home or Building Addition, 18 Fence, 11 Paved Area, 4 Shed, 2Parking, 2 Outdoor Lighting, 1 Private Road, 1 2015-2019 Total Number of Projects Requesting Variances Type of Project) CITY OF NEW HOPE CITY OF CRYSTAL CITY OF ROBBINSDALE CITY OF MINNEAPOLISCITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK CITY OF MINNEAPOLISCITY OFST. LO UIS PARKCITY OF ROBBINSDALECITY OF CRYSTAL CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK CITY OF NEWHOPECITYOFPLYMOUTHCITY OF MINNEAPOLISCITY OF ST. LOUIS PARKCITY OFPLYMOUTHWinnetka Ave SWinnetka Ave NWinnetka Ave NDouglas Dr NDouglas Dr NMedicine Lake Rd Glenwood AveMendelssohn Ave NPlymouth Ave N 10thAve N Golden Valley Rd7thAveBoone AveNWisconsin Ave NNevada Ave NGeneralMillsBlvdG o ld e n V alleyRdRhodeIslandSandburg Rd Country Club Dr Olympia St Harold AveLaurel Ave Louisiana Ave SJersey AveFloridaAve SGolden Hills DrZane Ave NLindsay St Olson Mem HwyFrontage Rd TurnersCrossroad NMeadow LnNNobleAve NHampshireAve SXenia Ave SWayzata BlvdW ayzataBlvdZenith Ave NDecatur Ave NDuluth St G o l d e n ValleyRd Be tty CrockerDr Pennsylvania Ave SWayzata Blvd TheodoreW i r t h Pkw yN Frontage R d LilacDrNAveN!(AcousticsAssociates Lat14 Asian Eatery Christian Life Center Former OptumOffice Site NobleElementarySchool 0 1, Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals 2019 Annual Report 12 Types Of Variances Considered Variance Type Description Front Yard Setback Requests to build structures within 35 feet of the front yard property line in R- 1, R-2, and Institutional Districts. Institutional Districts also require that at least 25 feet be landscaped and maintained as a buffer zone. Side Yard Setback Requests to build structures within the side yard setback area, which ranges from 5 feet to 50 feet depending on the type of structure and the Zoning District. Rear Yard Setback Requests to build structures within the rear yard setback area, which ranges from 5 feet to 50 feet depending on the type of structure and the Zoning District. Articulation Requests to waive articulation requirement, which requires inward or outward articulation of 2 feet in depth and 8 feet in length for every 32 feet of side wall on homes in the R-1 and R-2 Zoning Districts. Height Requests to build principal structures over the maximum height requirement, which ranges from 25 to 28 feet depending on the type of roof and the Zoning District. Fence Height Requests to build fences over the maximum height requirements, which ranges from 4 to 12 feet depending on the location on the property (front yard or side/rear yard) and the Zoning District. Building Envelope Requests to build a structure beyond the maximum building envelope, which is defined for properties within the R-1 and R-2 Zoning Districts. This includes the 2:1 or 4:1 slope requirement when the structure is taller than 15 feet at the side yard setback line. Accessory Structure Location Requests to build a garage, shed, or other accessory structure in a location that is not completely to the rear of the principal structure or in a location that is not at least 10 feet from the principal structure. Accessory Structure Size Requests to build a garage, shed, or other accessory structures above the allowable limit of 1,000 square feet in R-1, R-2, and Institutional Zoning Districts. Accessory Structure Height Requests to build a garage, shed, or other accessory structures above the maximum height requirements, which is 10 feet in the R-1, R-2, and Institutional Zoning Districts. Garage Width Request to build a garage in the R-2 District that is wider than 65 percent of the width of the front façade. Average Grade Requests to change the average grade of a property by more than 1 foot. Shoreland Setback Requests to build a structure within the minimum shoreland setbacks, which are larger than standard front, side, and rear setbacks. Impervious Surface Requests to construct additional impervious surface beyond the maximum allowable, which is 50 percent of the lot in R-1 and R-2 and 60 percent in R-3 and R-4 Zoning Districts. Minimum Parking Request to build or use an existing parking lot or garage with a number of parking spaces that is less than the minimum required based on the use of the property. Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals 2019 Annual Report 13 Outdoor Lighting Request regarding the total amount of foot candles of light produced by lighting systems, the amount of allowed light trespass, or other issues relating to lighting systems. Roadway Width Requests to build a private roadway above or below the maximum and minimum required widths respectively. Golden Valley Council/Manager Meeting May 12, 2020 Agenda Item 2. Discussion on Membership to Municipal Legislative Commission Prepared By Tim Cruikshank, City Manager Summary For the past few years, the Golden Valley City Council has included in its annual Legislative Priorities document the desire to adjust the fiscal disparities formula in a manner that would increase the city’s financial ability to reinvest in its infrastructure. For 2020, the Council agreed to be more aggressive in the pursuit of this change. The primary strategy in doing so is to enlist the support of other communities who are in a similar position. To this end, a group of cities have been identified that are part of an established organization that exists to lobby the Legislature on like topics. The organization is the Municipal Legislative Commission or MLC. While Golden Valley is already a member of two organizations who represent the city in St. Paul (the League of Minnesota Cities and Metro Cities), those organizations are broader in scope. Joining the MLC potentially could result in a more focused effort regarding the fiscal disparities effort. It is not uncommon for like cities or cities in a region to participate in an organization like this. One good example is the North Metro Mayors Association who represents a number of cities to the north and west of Golden Valley. To learn more about the MLC, please go to MLCMN.ORG. Financial Or Budget Considerations This item is presented for Council discussion and preparation for the 2021 budget. It would cost around 6,000 per year for the city to become a member. Staff is seeking council input and direction on whether to include this item in the 2021 proposed budget. Golden Valley Council/Manager Meeting May 12, 2020 Agenda Item 3. Letter of Support for Bassett Creek Trail Alignment Prepared By Marc Nevinski, Physical Development Director Jeff Oliver, City Engineer Summary Last fall Three Rivers Park District (TRPD) initiated a process to prepare an application for federal funding to complete the Bassett Creek Regional Trail. This trail section is proposed to be an off-street multi-use trail running along the south side of Golden Valley Road from Regent Avenue east to Bonnie Lane. To increase the likelihood of a grant award, TRPD approached the City and Hennepin County about including a local section of trail from Regent Avenue west to Douglas Drive in the grant application. This trail section is proposed to be located on the north side of Duluth Street. Including this local section in the proposed project is expected to improve the grant application’s likelihood of success as it provides increased multi-modal access to and from jobs, commerce, transit, and housing in the corridor. This section of trail will be owned and maintained by the City. This plan was discussed at the November 12, 2019, Council Manager meeting with representatives of TRPD and supported by the Council. Both segments of the trail are identified in the City’s Bike and Pedestrian Plan and 2040 Comprehensive Plan. A feasibility study of the regional trail was completed in 2014 and multi-modal transportation options along the corridor have been considered as part of the Blue Line Extension project. The grant application process includes the development of 60% plans for the trail. Lead by TRPD, two open houses were held at locations along the corridor in December and February, the first at Courage Kenney and the second at King of Grace Lutheran Church. Invitations were sent to businesses and residents within 500 feet of the corridor and distributed throughout the community. Efforts were made by TRPD to reach out to underrepresented groups in the area. Social media and newsfeeds were published to promote the open houses, and TRPD maintained a project website. The City also solicited input through an online survey which is summarized in the attached community input report. The 60% plans identify the trail’s location along the corridor, its design components, and the anticipated impacts it will have. Generally, the trail will be 8’ to 10’ in width and located in the existing right of way. East of Regent Avenue, where the roadway is wide, the south curb line will be moved slightly north to accommodate the trail and minimize impacts to property owners, although additional Council/Manager Meeting Executive Summary City of Golden Valley May 12, 2020 2 right of way will be needed in some locations. The road is proposed to shift slightly north in the area of Hidden Lake Parkway to avoid impacts to landscaping and infrastructure, although again, some right of way is proposed to be acquired. No modifications to the roadway are expected on the local section from Regent Avenue west to Douglas Drive, however some additional right of way will need to be acquired. A separate trail bridge is planned over Bassett Creek in the Bassett Creek Nature Area. Total construction of the trail is estimated to be almost $5.1M with the local trail section costing about $2.2M, due in large part to the bridge over Bassett Creek and right of way needs, and the regional trail section costing nearly $2.9M. These estimates include contingency costs and annual inflation factors projected through 2025. TRPD has requested the City provide a letter of support of the project for inclusion in the grant application. The grant application will be submitted within the week and award announcements are expected in the fall. If successful, TRPD would then develop a complete set of plans and specifications for the trail, which will include more detail and finalize a number of decisions. Construction would occur in 2024 or 2025 when funding is made available. Financial Or Budget Considerations There are no immediate budget impacts resulting from the project at this time. However, the grant has a 20% local match requirement, and if awarded, the partnering agencies will need to determine funding of the match for the local section of the trail. TRPD will provide the local match and expenses not eligible for grant funding, for the regional trail section. TRPD and the City will look to Hennepin County to fund these expenses for the local trail section. Supporting Documents • Location Map (1 page) • Draft Letter of Support for Bassett Creek Regional Trail 60% Plans (1 Page) • Plan Sheets – proposed layout (14 Pages) • Community Input Report (36 Pages) !!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Sweeney LakeTwin LakeB a s s et t C ree k SouthRicePond Bassett CreekBas s e tt Cr e e k BassettC r e e k Sweeney LakeBranchMain Stem Sochacki Park ScheidPark Briarwood Nature Area BassettCreekNature Area St CroixPark Theodore WirthRegional Park SochackiPark Minnaqua Greenbelt (Mpls Park & Rec Board)Regent Ave NNoble Ave NBo n n i e L n G oldenV alleyRdSpringValleyRdStCroix Ave NDouglas Drive / County Road 102ToledoA v e N HiddenL akesP k wyLilac Dr NGoldenValley R oad/CountyR o a d 66Highway 100DuluthStreet /Count y R o a d 66 Æÿ100 4567102 456766 456766 Bassett Creek Trail I 0 1,000 2,000500Feet Sources: Print Date: 4/17/2020-Hennepin County Surveyors Office for Property Lines (2020).-City of Golden Valley for all other layers. Bassett Creek Trail Segment 1, Trail on South Side Segment 2, Trail on North Side !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(äääääääääääääää ääääCITY O F N E W H O P E C I T Y O F C R Y S T A L C I T Y O F R O B B I N S D A L E CITY OF MINNEAPOLISC I T Y O F S T . L O U I S P A R K CITY OF MINNEAPOLISCITY OFST. LOUIS PARKCITY OF ROBBINSDALECITY OF CRYSTAL CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARKCITY OF CRYSTALC I T Y O F N E W H O P E CITY OF PLYMOUTHCITY OF MINNEAPOLISC I T Y O FST. L O U I S P A R KCITY OFPLYMOUTH456766 456770 456766 456740 456740 4567156 4567102 §¨¦394 §¨¦394 Æÿ55Æÿ55 Æÿ100 Æÿ100 £¤169 £¤169 Laurel Ave Duluth St 10th Ave N Regent Ave NNoble Ave NOlympia St Western Ave Culver Rd 23rd Ave N Kelly DrWayzata Blvd Knoll St Plym ou th Ave N Sumter Ave NPennsylvania Ave NN Frontage Rd S cottQuebec Ave NValders Ave NCountry Club Dr 26th Ave N Sandburg Rd Zane Ave NManor DrWinsdale St Brunswick Ave N34th Ave N Boone Ave NEarl St Rd A veNBridgewaterRdTryol Tra ilFlorida Ave NHanley RdGolden Hills Dr Lowry Ter Winnetka Ave SXerxes Ave NIndependence Ave NMajorDrZenith Ave NFlag Ave NWestwood Dr SWestbend Rd Sumter Ave SHampshire L nOrchard Ave NCircle Down Lindsay St NobleDrPoplar DrAve Heights Dr Heights Dr S Frontage R d Dres d e n L n Leg e ndDrFrontage RdBrookridgeAveNWinnetka Ave NLawn TerNatchez Ave SGettysburg Ave NMarket St Naper St Decatur Ave N Oregon Ave NKewanee W ay Pennsylvania Ave SDona Ln ArdmoreDrGlenwoodP k w y Tryol TrailWestbrook Rd M cN air Dr Phoenix St Ottawa Ave NThotland Rd Wisconsin Ave NUtah Ave SJersey Ave SBies DrWills PlColon i al DrEdgewood Ave NBassettCree k DrAdair Ave NJune Ave SNevada Ave NHarold Ave BrookviewPkwyNWynnwood Rd Lee Ave NTurners Cr ossroadNAquil aAveNMendelssohn Ave NBrookview Pkwy SE lm daleRd M ea nderRd Jersey Ave NSorell Ave Dakota Ave SVista DrKyleAveNWindsorWayAve SGoldenValley R oad/County R o ad 66Highway 100Ros eMaryland Ave NAlfred Rd Cortlawn Cir SIdaho Ave NIndianaAve N7th Ave N Rhode Island Ave NBrunswick Ave SZ a n e Av e NBurntsideDrRoanoke Rd WoodstockAve PerryAveNAve NTrailMedle y L n Georgia Ave NWally St Cutacross Rd Xenia Ave NHampshireKillarney DrKentucky Ave SJune Ave NZephyr PlLouisiana Ave SCloverLnC loverleafDr Clo v erleafDrLilacLoop MaryHillsDrFloridaAveSXylonAveNDecaturAveNKent uckyAveNTopelRd YorkAve NGreenValley Rd Chatelain T e r N o r m a n d y Bo n n i e L n Elgin Pl MerribeeDr Louisiana Ave NDuluthLn Marie Ln E Kalt ernLnOrkla DrLilacDrNToledoAveNM a rkayRidge Westbend Rd FairlawnWayG o ldenValley R d Nevada Ave SMarieLn W WestmoreWay WolfberryLn HamptonRd YukonCtHampshireAve NKentleyAve Cortlawn Cir WWinnetka Oregon Ave SPlUnityAveNB a s s e t t C reek Dr BassettCreek Ln M innaq u aD rToledoA v e NWinfieldAveUnity Ave NB re n n er P a s s FaribaultSt ArcherAve N AdelineLn K in g s t o n C ir G o ld e n V a lle y D rVarnerCirValders Ct G reenview LnHampshire Ave NWinnetka Phoenix St Duluth St Wayzata BlvdWisconsinAveN Adell A v e MajorAveNZealandAveNEnsignAveNKelly DrXerxes Ave NKnoll St Lilac Dr NFlag Ave NRhode Island Ave NPlymouth Ave N Wayzata Blvd G o lden Valley R d Orkla DrWayzata BlvdAve NZealandAveNS tCroixCirLeeAveNLamplighterLnSandburg LnMadisonAve W Lewis RdLilac Dr NHamptonRd Elgin Pl Boone Ave NCircleDownJersey Ave NWinsdale St OttawaAve NOlympia St Winnetka Heights Dr LilacDrNLouisiana Ave NKyleAveNNoble AveManor 10th Ave N RhodeIslandAveSHalfMoonDr OrdwayLo rin g L n Winsdale StZane Ave NHarold Ave FloridaAve NJerseyAve NParkview TerPh o en ix StWisconsin Ave NW a y zataBlvd FranceAve NHiddenLakesP k wyIsland DrTryolTrail Maryla ndAveNMedicine Lake Road / County Road 70 B e t t y CrockerDr RidgewayRdRhodeIslandAveNTerrace LnCastle CtFieldIndiana Ave NSchaper Rd Colonial Rd 24th Ave N 27th Ave N SussexRdKing Hill RdConstance Dr W25th Ave N SpringValley CirFrontena cAve SkylineDrSkyline DrHampshirePlCavellAveN Laurel Ave Ski Hill R d Me ridia n D r WesternLouisianaAve NColoradoS t M a rg a re t D rRoanoke CirCherokeeOak GroveQu e b e cAv e SKennethWay WasatchLnWelcomeTyrolCrest CortlawnCir NTer NatchezAveNBur n t s id e DrG oldenV alleyRdGeneralMillsBlvdEdge w ood Ave SEdgewood Ave SEllis LnJonellen Ln WestwoodLn Gregory Cr est vi ewAveColoradoWis c o n si n A v e S Valley-woodCir Maryland Ave SMedicine Lake Road / County Road 70 SchullerGettysburgCt Vermont Ave SFloridaCtMajorCir PrincetonAve SValery RdBrogger CirGardenPark QuailAve NOrchardLouisiana Ave SWestern Ave Perry Ave NIdaho Ave NWayzata BlvdValders Ave NValders Ave NYosemiteAve NWinsdale St Decatur Ave NNatchezAve SG len w o o d P kw yOttawaAve SEdgewoodAve NSpringValleyRdSt Croix AveN Wat erfordDrMendelssohn Ave NManches te r Dr HeritageCir StCroix Ave N W el comeWinnetka Avenue North / County Road 156Douglas Drive / County Road 1021 Highway 1693 S F r o ntage Rd DuluthStreet /County R o ad 66 Ensign Ave NOrchardAve NIdaho Ave NKnoll WestbrookRd Winsdale St BrunswickScott Ave NWynnwood Rd HillsboroAve NSunsetRid g e Dr Quebec St OttawaA veSAngeloDrWoodlandTrailHiddenLakes P kwyWinsdaleSt AlpinePa ssAvondaleRd Dou glasA ve QuentinAveSRavineMaddausLn LnKyle PlUnity Ave NToledoAveNSpruce TrWes tchesterCirCirCt WaterfordScottAveNDawnview Ter Dawnview Ter ConstanceDrELilac Dr NPlymouth Ave NWisconsinAveNMedley Rd 6 PaisleyLnGlendenTer P l Noble Ave NTer Byrd Ave N Parkvie w B lv dYork AveNMeadowLnSLilac Dr NAve NDuluth St Patsy Ln 2 3 H illsboroINDEX1 - English Cir2 - Kings Valley Rd3 - Kings Valley Rd E4 - Kings Valley Rd W5 - Marquis Rd6 - Mayfair Rd7 - Stroden Cir8 - Tamarin Tr CarriagePath M endelssohnLn N ValeCrestRdCir Cir TyrolTrail Janalyn Cir Glencrest RdJanalynCir StrawberryLn WestwoodDrNBe verly Av e Leber SunnyridgeLnMeadow Ln NMeadowLnN DahlbergD rWoodstock Ave Lilac DrNN Frontage R dHeath-brookeCir Le ge n dLn Bassett CreekDr Glenwood Avenue /Co u n tyRoad40WelcomeAveNWesleyCommons DrTheodo r e W i r thPkwyQuailAveNPerryAveNQuailAveNRegentAveNScottA v eN33rd Ave N L o wry Drake R d Trit onDr GlenwoodAvePennsylvania Ave NG oldenValleyRdJulianne Ter WesleyDr 4 5 6 7 8 8 2 2AveN ZealandAve NZealandAveNAquilaAveN Aquila Ave NMa ndanAv eNPlymouth Ave N OrklaDrKnol l S t Orkla DrValders Ave NMedley Cir AveS EwaldT e rK ingCreekRdH aroldAve LoringLn Woodstoc k A v e Yosemite CirYosemiteAveNXeniaAveSTurners Crossroad SRadissonRd Turnp i keRdTurnpikeRd B as s e tt Cre ekB l vdPaisleyLnPaisleyLn Alley AlleyH ig h w a y 1 0 0Highway 169I n t e r s t a t e -3 9 4 / H i g h w a y 1 2 In ters ta te-3 9 4 / H ig h w ay 1 2 Highway 55 / Olson Memorial HighwayHighway 55 / Olson Memorial Highway H ig h w a y 5 5 / O ls o n M e m o r ia l H ig h w a y To Be Determinedin Future Study 0 0.4 0.80.2 Miles Bicycle & Pedestrian Network Existing Regional Trail Local Trail or Sidewalk On-Street Bike Lane Proposed Protected Bikeway Bike Lane Enhanced Sharrow Signed Bike Route Multi-Use Trail Regional Multi-Use Trail Facility Type TBD Sidewalk ä Connection to Trail System in Adjacent City !(Intersection for Potential Crossing Treatments !(Multi-Use Trail Connection Future Study Area ISources: -Hennepin County Surveyors Office for Property Lines (2017). -City of Golden Valley for all other layers (2017). Existing and Proposed Bikeways and Sidewalks -0.81%0.53%-0.04%-0.43%-0.90%-0.37%-1.11%100+00.00 ELEV = 885.21 VPC 101+85.96 ELEV. 885.32 VPT 102+35.96 ELEV. 885.34K = 52M = 0.06'50.00' V.C.VPI 102+10.96 ELEV. 885.452H.P. 102+13.66ELEV. 885.39VPC 102+56.89 ELEV. 885.26 VPT 103+06.89 ELEV. 884.92K = 105M = 0.03'50.00' V.C.VPI 102+81.89 ELEV. 885.149 VPC 104+39.25 ELEV. 883.95 VPT 105+09.25 ELEV. 883.43K = 95M = 0.06'70.00' V.C.VPI 104+74.25 ELEV. 883.819 VPC 105+25.09 ELEV. 883.26 VPC 100+04.34 ELEV. 885.18VPT 100+74.34 ELEV. 884.88K = 91M = 0.07'70.00' V.C.VPI 100+39.34ELEV. 884.895VPC 100+76.25 ELEV. 884.88VPT 101+26.25 ELEV. 885.00K = 88M = 0.04'50.00' V.C.VPI 101+01.25ELEV. 884.870L.P. 100+79.75ELEV. 884.88VPC 103+58.12 ELEV. 884.46 VPT 104+38.12 ELEV. 883.95K = 149M = 0.05'80.00' V.C.VPI 103+98.12 ELEV. 884.098EXISTING GROUNDR/L PROFILE GRADETOP OF FINISHED SURFACE100+00101+00102+00103+00104+00105+00DOUGLAS DR EX R/WCONSTLIMITSBEGIN CONSTRUCTIONTEMPORARY EASEMENTPROPOSED R/W18' 8'4" BROKEN LINE CENTERLINE PAVEMENT MARKINGBEGIN CONSTRUCTIONBEGIN WEST LOCAL TRAILSTA 100+00MATCHLINE STA 105+40 GENERAL NOTES:ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN FEET UNLESS OTHERWISENOTED.ALL DIMENSIONS TO CURB & GUTTER ARE TO FACEOF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.BITUMINOUS PATHCONCRETEPEDESTRIAN BRIDGEBITUMINOUS OVERLAYLEGENDEXISTING RIGHT OF WAYPROPOSED RIGHT OF WAYTEMPORARY EASEMENTPROPERTY LINECONSTRUCTION LIMITSNOTES:MATCH EXISTINGCONSTRUCT PEDESTRIAN RAMPRETAINING WALL IMPACTRELOCATE SIGNALABCDAAAB EXISTING GROUNDR/L PROFILE GRADETOP OF FINISHED SURFACEVPC 107+97.24 ELEV. 878.08 VPT 108+97.24 ELEV. 875.52K = 887M = 0.01'100.00' V.C.VPI 108+47.24 ELEV. 876.771 VPC 110+81.15 ELEV. 870.79 VPT 111+06.15 ELEV. 870.30K = 14M = 0.05'25.00' V.C.VPI 110+93.65 ELEV. 870.436 -1.07%-1.94%-1.42%-2.81%-2.62%-2.50%-1.26%105+81.57 ELEV = 882.58106+53.03 ELEV = 881.57 110+40.00 ELEV = 871.94 VPT 105+75.09 ELEV. 882.66K = 321M = 0.01'50.00' V.C.VPI 105+50.09ELEV. 882.980VPC 106+59.54 ELEV. 881.44VPT 107+29.54 ELEV. 879.85K = 103M = 0.06'70.00' V.C.VPI 106+94.54ELEV. 880.766 VPC 111+07.73 ELEV. 870.29 VPT 111+32.73 ELEV. 869.83K = 17M = 0.05'25.00' V.C.VPI 111+20.23 ELEV. 870.152 106+00107+00108+00109+00110+00111+00ADAIR AV E BRUNSWICK AVE EX R/WCONSTLIMITSRECONSTRUCT STONE RETAININGWALL USING SALVAGED MATERIALSTA 111+02.65 TO STA 111+86.27TEMPORARY EASEMENT20' 15'4" BROKEN LINE CENTERLINE PAVEMENT MARKING4" BROKEN LINE CENTERLINE PAVEMENT MARKING4" SOLID LINE EDGE PAVEMENT MARKING2' CLEAR ZONEPROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY10' 10'RELOCATE STREET LIGHTRELOCATE STREET LIGHTMATCHLINE STA 105+40 MATCHLINE S T A 1 1 1 + 4 0BITUMINOUS PATHCONCRETEPEDESTRIAN BRIDGEBITUMINOUS OVERLAYLEGENDEXISTING RIGHT OF WAYPROPOSED RIGHT OF WAYTEMPORARY EASEMENTPROPERTY LINECONSTRUCTION LIMITSNOTES:MATCH EXISTINGCONSTRUCT PEDESTRIAN RAMPRETAINING WALL IMPACTRELOCATE SIGNALDCBABBAABBR/L WEST LOCAL TRAILAAC EXISTING GROUNDVPC 111+53.70 ELEV. 869.29VPT 112+03.70 ELEV. 868.25K = 49M = 0.06'50.00' V.C.VPI 111+78.70ELEV. 868.642VPC 112+10.12 ELEV. 868.15VPT 112+60.12 ELEV. 867.50K = 95M = 0.03'50.00' V.C.VPI 112+35.12ELEV. 867.759 VPC 114+88.40 ELEV. 865.13 VPT 115+48.40 ELEV. 864.90K = 46M = 0.10'60.00' V.C.VPI 115+18.40 ELEV. 864.819L.P. 115+36.39ELEV. 864.88VPC 116+14.50 ELEV. 865.07 VPT 116+84.50 ELEV. 865.69K = 56M = 0.11'70.00' V.C.VPI 116+49.50 ELEV. 865.1600.26%-1.04%-2.58%-1.57%R/L PROFILE GRADETOP OF FINISHED SURFACE© 2020 M icrosoft Corporat ion © 2020 D ig ita lG lobe ©CNES (2020) D istr ibut ion A irbus DS 112+00113+00114+00115+00116+00117+00EX R/WCONSTLIMITSPEDESTRIAN BRIDGESEE BRIDGE PLANSBRIDGE DECKCONCRETE APPROACH SLABCONCRETE APPROACH SLABRECONSTRUCT STONE RETAININGWALL USING SALVAGED MATERIALSTA 111+02.65 TO STA 111+86.274" BROKEN LINE CENTERLINE PAVEMENT MARKING4" SOLID LINE EDGE PAVEMENT MARKING2' CLEAR ZONETEMPORARY EASEMENTPROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY13'33'13'9'TEMPORARY EASEMENTSTORM SEWER IMPACTSSEE DRAINAGE PLANSMATCHLINE STA 111+40 MATCHLINE STA 1 1 7 + 4 0 BITUMINOUS PATHCONCRETEPEDESTRIAN BRIDGEBITUMINOUS OVERLAYLEGENDEXISTING RIGHT OF WAYPROPOSED RIGHT OF WAYTEMPORARY EASEMENTPROPERTY LINECONSTRUCTION LIMITSNOTES:MATCH EXISTINGCONSTRUCT PEDESTRIAN RAMPRETAINING WALL IMPACTRELOCATE SIGNALDCBAR/L WEST LOCAL TRAILCAAABB EXISTING GROUNDVPC 118+26.97 ELEV. 867.82 VPT 118+76.97 ELEV. 868.60K = 535M = 0.01'50.00' V.C.VPI 118+51.97 ELEV. 868.199 VPC 119+51.97 ELEV. 869.79 VPT 120+01.97 ELEV. 871.50K = 14M = 0.23'50.00' V.C.VPI 119+76.97 ELEV. 870.192 VPC 120+50.99 ELEV. 871.19 VPT 120+85.99 ELEV. 871.27K = 7M = 0.22'35.00' V.C.VPI 120+68.49 ELEV. 870.788L.P. 120+66.99ELEV. 871.015.23%-0.71%-2.32%2.75%1.50%1.59%120+02.92 ELEV = 871.55 120+50.23 ELEV = 871.21 121+09.44 ELEV = 871.92R/L PROFILE GRADETOP OF FINISHED SURFACE© 2020 Microsoft Corporation © 2020 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2020) Distribution Airbus DS 117+00118+00119+00120+00121+00MN STATE PATROL LILAC DREX R/WCONSTLIMITSRELOCATE SIGNAL POLECONSTRUCT RETAINING WALLEND CONSTRUCTION4" BROKEN LINE CENTERLINE PAVEMENT MARKING4" SOLID LINE EDGE PAVEMENT MARKING2' CLEAR ZONETEMPORARY EASEMENTPROPOSED RIGHT OF WAYEND WEST LOCAL TRAILSTA 121+09.44CONSTRUCT RETAINING WALLPROPOSED RIGHT OF WAYTEMPORARY EASEMENTMATCHLINE STA 117+40 BITUMINOUS PATHCONCRETEPEDESTRIAN BRIDGEBITUMINOUS OVERLAYLEGENDEXISTING RIGHT OF WAYPROPOSED RIGHT OF WAYTEMPORARY EASEMENTPROPERTY LINECONSTRUCTION LIMITSNOTES:MATCH EXISTINGCONSTRUCT PEDESTRIAN RAMPRETAINING WALL IMPACTRELOCATE SIGNALDCBAR/L WEST LOCAL TRAILAAABBCDCAAA EXISTING GROUNDVPC 201+97.68 ELEV. 849.36 VPT 202+57.68 ELEV. 849.34K = 48M = 0.09'60.00' V.C.VPI 202+27.68 ELEV. 849.161L.P. 202+29.42ELEV. 849.25VPC 203+35.47 ELEV. 849.79 VPT 203+82.01 ELEV. 850.38K = 35M = 0.08'46.54' V.C.VPI 203+58.74 ELEV. 849.928 VPC 203+84.91 ELEV. 850.43 VPT 204+24.91 ELEV. 851.82K = 13M = 0.15'40.00' V.C.VPI 204+04.91 ELEV. 850.8163.49%1.44%-0.66%5.00%-2.77%1.92%0.58%200+00.00 ELEV = 847.57 204+46.85 ELEV = 852.19 VPC 200+02.27 ELEV. 847.65VPT 200+42.27 ELEV. 848.64K = 20M = 0.10'40.00' V.C.VPI 200+22.27ELEV. 848.348VPC 200+90.46 ELEV. 849.33 VPT 201+60.46 ELEV. 849.60K = 33M = 0.18'70.00' V.C.VPI 201+25.46 ELEV. 849.833H.P. 201+38.52ELEV. 849.67VPC 204+28.55 ELEV. 852.00 VPT 204+46.55 ELEV. 852.20 K = 2M = 0.17'18.00' V.C.VPI 204+37.55 ELEV. 852.448 H.P. 204+40.13ELEV. 852.29R/L PROFILE GRADETOP OF FINISHED SURFACE200+00201+00202+00203+00204+00300+00REGE N T A V E TOLEDO AVEEX R/WCONSTLIMITSBEGIN CONSTRUCTIONAVOID DISTURBINGPEDESTRIAN BRIDGEPROPOSED RIGHT OF WAYTEMPORARY EASEMENTEX R/W11'8'RELOCATE STREET LIGHT4" BROKEN LINE CENTERLINE PAVEMENT MARKING10'END CENTRAL LOCAL TRAILSTA 204+46.85BEGIN CENTRAL LOCAL TRAILSTA 200+00.00BITUMINOUS PATHCONCRETEPEDESTRIAN BRIDGEBITUMINOUS OVERLAYLEGENDEXISTING RIGHT OF WAYPROPOSED RIGHT OF WAYTEMPORARY EASEMENTPROPERTY LINECONSTRUCTION LIMITSNOTES:MATCH EXISTINGCONSTRUCT PEDESTRIAN RAMPRETAINING WALL IMPACTRELOCATE SIGNALDCBAR/L CENTRAL LOCAL TRAILBAABAAABB EXISTING GROUNDR/L PROFILE GRADETOP OF FINISHED SURFACEVPC 300+90.75 ELEV. 858.04 VPT 301+50.75 ELEV. 860.32K = 39M = 0.11'60.00' V.C.VPI 301+20.75 ELEV. 858.952 VPC 300+00.57 ELEV. 855.79 VPT 300+30.57 ELEV. 856.21K = 9M = 0.13'30.00' V.C.VPI 300+15.57ELEV. 855.749L.P. 300+03.21ELEV. 855.793.09%-0.29%3.05%4.57%300+00.01 ELEV = 855.79 VPC 302+40.25 ELEV. 864.42 VPT 303+00.25 ELEV. 866.71K = 40M = 0.11'60.00' V.C.VPI 302+70.25 ELEV. 865.787 VPC 303+71.41 ELEV. 868.91 204+00300+00301+00302+00303+00304+00GOLDENVALLEYROADREGENT AVEREGENT AVE EX R/WCONSTLIMITSBEGIN 2" MILLAND OVERLAYTEMPORARYEASEMENT5'STORM SEWER IMPACTSSEE DRAINAGE PLANS10'STORM SEWER IMPACTSSEE DRAINAGE PLANS4" BROKEN LINEPAVEMENT MARKING4" SOLID LINE PAVEMENT MARKINGPROPOSED RIGHT OF WAYBEGIN EAST REGIONAL TRAILSTA 300+00.00CROSSWALK PAVEMENT MARKING(DESIGN TO BE DETERMINED)STOP BAR PAVEMENT MARKINGMATCHLINE STA 303+75BITUMINOUS PATHCONCRETEPEDESTRIAN BRIDGEBITUMINOUS OVERLAYLEGENDEXISTING RIGHT OF WAYPROPOSED RIGHT OF WAYTEMPORARY EASEMENTPROPERTY LINECONSTRUCTION LIMITSNOTES:MATCH EXISTINGCONSTRUCT PEDESTRIAN RAMPRETAINING WALL IMPACTRELOCATE SIGNALDCBAR/L EAST REGIONAL TRAILBBBBBAAAAAA VPC 305+83.33 ELEV. 872.89 VPT 306+83.33 ELEV. 874.75K = 130M = 0.10'100.00' V.C.VPI 306+33.33 ELEV. 873.6262.36%1.47%2.01%2.24%VPT 304+21.41 ELEV. 870.27K = 68M = 0.05'50.00' V.C.VPI 303+96.41ELEV. 869.682VPC 304+22.92 ELEV. 870.31VPT 304+72.92 ELEV. 871.26K = 57M = 0.06'50.00' V.C.VPI 304+47.92ELEV. 870.896 VPC 308+16.58 ELEV. 877.73 VPT 308+86.58 ELEV. 879.22K = 304M = 0.02'70.00' V.C.VPI 308+51.58 ELEV. 878.517 VPC 309+03.78 ELEV. 879.57EXISTING GROUNDR/L PROFILE GRADETOP OF FINISHED SURFACE304+00305+00307+00308+00309+00ORDWAY QU A I L A V E EX R/WCONSTLIMITSSTORM SEWER IMPACTSSEE DRAINAGE PLANSSTORM SEWER IMPACTSSEE DRAINAGE PLANSSTORM SEWER IMPACTSSEE DRAINAGE PLANS4" BROKEN LINEPAVEMENT MARKING4" SOLID LINE PAVEMENT MARKINGTEMPORARY EASEMENT8'13'MATCHLINE STA 303+75 MATCHLINE STA 309+35BITUMINOUS PATHCONCRETEPEDESTRIAN BRIDGEBITUMINOUS OVERLAYLEGENDEXISTING RIGHT OF WAYPROPOSED RIGHT OF WAYTEMPORARY EASEMENTPROPERTY LINECONSTRUCTION LIMITSNOTES:MATCH EXISTINGCONSTRUCT PEDESTRIAN RAMPRETAINING WALL IMPACTRELOCATE SIGNALDCBAR/L EAST REGIONAL TRAILAAABB VPC 314+39.69 ELEV. 868.07 VPT 314+79.69 ELEV. 867.19K = 13M = 0.15'40.00' V.C.VPI 314+59.69 ELEV. 867.333 -0.79%-3.08%-3.68%-0.72%VPT 310+03.78 ELEV. 880.18K = 36M = 0.35'100.00' V.C.VPI 309+53.78ELEV. 880.572H.P. 309+75.46ELEV. 880.29VPC 310+27.00 ELEV. 879.99 VPT 311+17.00 ELEV. 878.25K = 39M = 0.26'90.00' V.C.VPI 310+72.00ELEV. 879.633 VPC 313+69.20 ELEV. 870.48 VPT 314+29.20 ELEV. 868.46K = 100M = 0.05'60.00' V.C.VPI 313+99.20 ELEV. 869.560EXISTING GROUNDR/L PROFILE GRADETOP OF FINISHED SURFACE309+00310+00311+00312+00313+00314+00315+00NOBLE AVEN O B L E A V E SPRING VALLEY RD ORDWAYEX R/WCONSTLIMITSRECONSTRUCT DRIVEWAY APRONSRELOCATE SIGNAL POLERELOCATE SIGNAL POLESTORM SEWER IMPACTSSEE DRAINAGE PLANS4" BROKEN LINEPAVEMENT MARKING4" SOLID LINE PAVEMENT MARKINGTEMPORARYEASEMENT5'MATCHLINE STA 309+35 MATCHLINE S T A 3 1 4 + 9 5BITUMINOUS PATHCONCRETEPEDESTRIAN BRIDGEBITUMINOUS OVERLAYLEGENDEXISTING RIGHT OF WAYPROPOSED RIGHT OF WAYTEMPORARY EASEMENTPROPERTY LINECONSTRUCTION LIMITSNOTES:MATCH EXISTINGCONSTRUCT PEDESTRIAN RAMPRETAINING WALL IMPACTRELOCATE SIGNALDCBAR/L EAST REGIONAL TRAILAAAAABBD VPC 318+42.83 ELEV. 854.66 VPT 319+22.83 ELEV. 850.78K = 43M = 0.19'80.00' V.C.VPI 318+82.83 ELEV. 852.350 VPC 319+61.89 ELEV. 849.24 VPT 320+21.89 ELEV. 847.65K = 24M = 0.19'60.00' V.C.VPI 319+91.89 ELEV. 848.063 -2.19%-5.78%-3.93%-1.57%-1.39%VPC 315+73.70 ELEV. 865.88VPT 316+23.70 ELEV. 864.95K = 81M = 0.04'50.00' V.C.VPI 315+98.70ELEV. 865.492VPC 316+50.21 ELEV. 864.37 VPT 317+30.21 ELEV. 861.18K = 22M = 0.36'80.00' V.C.VPI 316+90.21 ELEV. 863.492 VPT 315+19.70 ELEV. 866.73K = 47M = 0.04'40.00' V.C.VPI 314+99.70ELEV. 867.047EXISTING GROUNDR/L PROFILE GRADETOP OF FINISHED SURFACE315+00316+00317+00318+00319+00320+00321+00MAJOR CIRNOBLE DRNOBLE AVEEX R/WCONSTLIMITS>>RELOCATE SIGNAL POLERELOCATESTORM SEWER IMPACTSSEE DRAINAGE PLANSSTORM SEWER IMPACTSSEE DRAINAGE PLANS4" DOUBLE SOLID LINEPAVEMENT MARKING4" SOLID LINE PAVEMENT MARKINGRELOCATEWATERMAINMATCHLINE STA 314+95 MATCHLINE STA 3 2 0 + 8 5BITUMINOUS PATHCONCRETEPEDESTRIAN BRIDGEBITUMINOUS OVERLAYLEGENDEXISTING RIGHT OF WAYPROPOSED RIGHT OF WAYTEMPORARY EASEMENTPROPERTY LINECONSTRUCTION LIMITSNOTES:MATCH EXISTINGCONSTRUCT PEDESTRIAN RAMPRETAINING WALL IMPACTRELOCATE SIGNALDCBAR/L EAST REGIONAL TRAILAABB VPC 320+96.55 ELEV. 846.61VPT 321+56.55 ELEV. 846.15K = 48M = 0.09'60.00' V.C.VPI 321+26.55ELEV. 846.190VPC 322+31.92 ELEV. 846.05 VPT 322+91.92 ELEV. 846.80K = 22M = 0.21'60.00' V.C.VPI 322+61.92ELEV. 846.007L.P. 322+34.86ELEV. 846.05VPC 323+31.40 ELEV. 847.84 VPT 323+91.40 ELEV. 849.93K = 35M = 0.13'60.00' V.C.VPI 323+61.40 ELEV. 848.626 VPC 324+52.80 ELEV. 852.59 VPT 325+12.80 ELEV. 855.48K = 62M = 0.07'60.00' V.C.VPI 324+82.80 ELEV. 853.887-0.14%4.33%5.30%2.63%VPC 326+24.63 ELEV. 861.40 K = 23M = 0.30'75.00' V.C.VPI 326+62.13 ELEV. 863.383EXISTING GROUNDR/L PROFILE GRADETOP OF FINISHED SURFACE>>>>>>>>>>>>321+00322+00323+00324+00325+00326+00327+00KYLE PLMAJOR DREX R/WCONSTLIMITS>>>>>>RELOCATE MAILBOXESSTORM SEWER IMPACTSSEE DRAINAGE PLANS4" DOUBLE SOLID LINEPAVEMENT MARKING4" SOLID LINE PAVEMENT MARKINGRELOCATEWATERMAINMATCHLINE STA 320+85 MATCHLINE STA 326+80BITUMINOUS PATHCONCRETEPEDESTRIAN BRIDGEBITUMINOUS OVERLAYLEGENDEXISTING RIGHT OF WAYPROPOSED RIGHT OF WAYTEMPORARY EASEMENTPROPERTY LINECONSTRUCTION LIMITSNOTES:MATCH EXISTINGCONSTRUCT PEDESTRIAN RAMPRETAINING WALL IMPACTRELOCATE SIGNALDCBAR/L EAST REGIONAL TRAILAAAAAAABBBB VPC 330+36.86 ELEV. 861.34 VPT 331+16.86 ELEV. 860.43K = 26M = 0.30'80.00' V.C.VPI 330+76.86 ELEV. 860.273L.P. 331+06.81ELEV. 860.41VPC 331+35.75 ELEV. 860.50 VPT 331+95.75 ELEV. 860.97K = 74M = 0.06'60.00' V.C.VPI 331+65.75 ELEV. 860.6120.38%2.07%1.07%-2.66%VPT 326+99.63 ELEV. 864.16VPC 327+34.24 ELEV. 864.88VPT 327+94.24 ELEV. 865.82K = 60M = 0.08'60.00' V.C.VPI 327+64.24ELEV. 865.499VPC 328+16.95 ELEV. 866.06 VPT 328+76.95 ELEV. 865.59K = 16M = 0.28'60.00' V.C.VPI 328+46.95ELEV. 866.385H.P. 328+34.17ELEV. 866.16EXISTING GROUNDR/L PROFILE GRADETOP OF FINISHED SURFACE327+00328+00329+00330+00331+00332+00333+00INDIANA AVE LEGEND DRSCHAPIRO CENTEREX R/WCONSTLIMITSEXISTING RETAININGWALL TO REMAINRELOCATE MAILBOXINSTALL NEW FENCEAT RETAINING WALLSTORM SEWER IMPACTSSEE DRAINAGE PLANS4" DOUBLE SOLID LINEPAVEMENT MARKING4" SOLID LINE PAVEMENT MARKINGTEMPORARY EASEMENT7' MATCHLINE STA 326+80 MAT C H L I N E S T A 3 3 2 + 6 5BITUMINOUS PATHCONCRETEPEDESTRIAN BRIDGEBITUMINOUS OVERLAYLEGENDEXISTING RIGHT OF WAYPROPOSED RIGHT OF WAYTEMPORARY EASEMENTPROPERTY LINECONSTRUCTION LIMITSNOTES:MATCH EXISTINGCONSTRUCT PEDESTRIAN RAMPRETAINING WALL IMPACTRELOCATE SIGNALDCBAR/L EAST REGIONAL TRAILBBAAAC VPC 335+90.65 ELEV. 860.04 VPT 336+20.65 ELEV. 859.64K = 38M = 0.03'30.00' V.C.VPI 336+05.65 ELEV. 859.7781.19%-1.72%-0.56%-2.04%-0.93%334+76.65 ELEV = 862.00 VPC 333+47.25 ELEV. 862.77VPT 333+87.49 ELEV. 862.90K = 23M = 0.09'40.23' V.C.VPI 333+67.37ELEV. 863.011H.P. 333+74.60ELEV. 862.93VPC 334+24.46 ELEV. 862.69 VPT 334+74.46 ELEV. 862.04K = 34M = 0.09'50.00' V.C.VPI 334+49.46 ELEV. 862.550 VPC 337+23.08 ELEV. 858.68 K = 56M = 0.51'150.00' V.C.VPI 337+98.08 ELEV. 857.984EXISTING GROUNDR/L PROFILE GRADETOP OF FINISHED SURFACE333+00334+00335+00336+00337+00338+00MARY HILLS DREX R/WCONSTLIMITSEXISTING RETAININGWALL TO REMAINHIDDEN LAKES PK W Y 4 ' WALK ING PATHRELOCATE STREET LIGHTSALVAGE AND REINSTALLGUARD RAILINSTALL NEW FENCEAT RETAINING WALLAVOID IMPACTING STAIRS4" SOLID LINE PAVEMENT MARKING4" SOLID LINE PAVEMENT MARKINGTEMPORARY EASEMENT8'EX R/WTEMPORARY EASEMENTMATCHLINE STA 332+65 MATCHLINE STA 338+3 0BITUMINOUS PATHCONCRETEPEDESTRIAN BRIDGEBITUMINOUS OVERLAYLEGENDEXISTING RIGHT OF WAYPROPOSED RIGHT OF WAYTEMPORARY EASEMENTPROPERTY LINECONSTRUCTION LIMITSNOTES:MATCH EXISTINGCONSTRUCT PEDESTRIAN RAMPRETAINING WALL IMPACTRELOCATE SIGNALDCBAR/L EAST REGIONAL TRAILBBBBAAAABBCDD VPC 338+76.70 ELEV. 855.13VPT 339+46.70 ELEV. 854.08K = 16M = 0.37'70.00' V.C.VPI 339+11.70ELEV. 853.860L.P. 339+36.24ELEV. 854.05VPC 343+43.69 ELEV. 843.10 VPT 344+24.20 ELEV. 841.32K = 30M = 0.27'80.51' V.C.VPI 343+83.95 ELEV. 841.673 -3.63%0.64%-2.96%-3.08%-3.54%VPT 338+73.08 ELEV. 855.26VPC 339+67.02 ELEV. 854.21VPT 340+07.02 ELEV. 853.75K = 11M = 0.18'40.00' V.C.VPI 339+87.02ELEV. 854.340H.P. 339+74.12ELEV. 854.24VPC 340+28.29 ELEV. 853.12 VPT 341+53.29 ELEV. 849.35K = 1039M = 0.02'125.00' V.C.VPI 340+90.79 ELEV. 851.271 VPC 342+28.19 ELEV. 847.04 VPT 342+88.19 ELEV. 845.06K = 131M = 0.03'60.00' V.C.VPI 342+58.19 ELEV. 846.119EXISTING GROUNDR/L PROFILE GRADETOP OF FINISHED SURFACE© 2020 Microsoft Corporation © 2020 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2020) Distribution Airbus DS 338+00339+00340+00341+00342+00343+00344+00BASSETT CREEK DRCONSTLIMITS4' WALKING PATHAVOID IMPACTING STAIRSSTORM SEWER IMPACTSSEE DRAINAGE PLANS4" SOLID LINE PAVEMENT MARKING4" DOUBLE SOLID LINEPAVEMENT MARKINGTEMPORARY EASEMENTEX R/WTEMPORARY EASEMENT3'REBUILD BUS SHELTERPEDESTRIAN REFUGE ISLANDMATCHLINE STA 338+30 MATCHLINE STA 344+3 0BITUMINOUS PATHCONCRETEPEDESTRIAN BRIDGEBITUMINOUS OVERLAYLEGENDEXISTING RIGHT OF WAYPROPOSED RIGHT OF WAYTEMPORARY EASEMENTPROPERTY LINECONSTRUCTION LIMITSNOTES:MATCH EXISTINGCONSTRUCT PEDESTRIAN RAMPRETAINING WALL IMPACTRELOCATE SIGNALDCBAR/L EAST REGIONAL TRAILAAAABBBB VPC 344+80.93 ELEV. 840.81 VPT 346+30.93 ELEV. 840.92K = 78M = 0.36'150.00' V.C.VPI 345+55.93ELEV. 840.144L.P. 345+50.40ELEV. 840.50VPC 347+26.97 ELEV. 843.16 VPT 347+96.97 ELEV. 845.82K = 89M = 0.07'70.00' V.C.VPI 347+61.97 ELEV. 844.352 VPC 346+48.87 ELEV. 841.10 VPT 346+98.87 ELEV. 842.21K = 21M = 0.15'50.00' V.C.VPI 346+73.87 ELEV. 841.360-0.89%1.03%3.40%4.19%4.39%348+83.38 ELEV = 849.43 349+37.03 ELEV = 851.79EXISTING GROUNDR/L PROFILE GRADETOP OF FINISHED SURFACE349+37344+00346+00347+00348+00349+00BONN I E L NEX R/WCONSTLIMITSBICYCLE SLIP RAMP TO TRANSITION BICYCLISTS TO ROADWAY SHOULDER(TO BE DETERMINED, COORDINATE WITH PROJECT TO THE WEST)END 2" MILL AND OVERLAYSTORM SEWER IMPACTSSEE DRAINAGE PLANS4" SOLID LINE PAVEMENT MARKING4" DOUBLE SOLID LINE PAVEMENT MARKINGTEMPORARY EASEMENT20'END PROJECTEND EAST REGIONAL TRAILSTA 349+27.03MATCHLINE STA 344+30 BITUMINOUS PATHCONCRETEPEDESTRIAN BRIDGEBITUMINOUS OVERLAYLEGENDEXISTING RIGHT OF WAYPROPOSED RIGHT OF WAYTEMPORARY EASEMENTPROPERTY LINECONSTRUCTION LIMITSNOTES:MATCH EXISTINGCONSTRUCT PEDESTRIAN RAMPRETAINING WALL IMPACTRELOCATE SIGNALDCBAR/L EAST REGIONAL TRAILAA May 13, 2020 Ms. Elaine Koutsoukos TAB Coordinator Transportation Advisory Board Metropolitan Council 390 North Robert Street St. Paul, MN 55101 Dear Ms. Koutsoukos, The City of Golden Valley supports Three Rivers Park District’s federal transportation funding request for the Bassett Creek Regional Trail: Final Gap Removal along Golden Valley Road. We understand the project will provide a multi- use regional trail along Golden Valley Road, between Regent Avenue and Bonnie Lane, that will ultimately complete the last segment of the Bassett Creek Regional Trail. We also support inclusion of a new multi-use local trail along Duluth Street, between Regent Avenue and Douglas Drive, that will be maintained by the City once complete. The City appreciates that the Park District has worked in partnership with the City and Hennepin County to develop 60% construction plans for the project to ensure all partners’ expectations for this project are met. The project is consistent with the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan, which includes the City’s Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan, as well as corridor related plans associated with the planned METRO Blue Line LRT station at Golden Valley Road. The addition of a multi-use trail along Golden Valley Road will significantly improve multi-modal access to and from employment areas, single and multi-family housing, and places of commerce and assembly, as well as improve access to both existing and future transit opportunities along the corridor. At its May 12, 2020 Council-Manager meeting, the Golden Valley City Council reviewed proposed trail alignment identified in the 60% plans and approves of the alignment. Pending award of the federal grant, the City looks forward to continuing this partnership to move towards completion of 100% construction documents for the implementation of this critical project. Sincerely, Timothy Cruikshank City Manager Cc: Matt Swenson, Project Manager, Three Rivers Park District Bassett Creek Trail Expansion Project COMMUNITY INPUT REPORT Bassett Creek Trail Expansion Project Community Input Report Page 1 Contents Overview ..……………………………………………………………..…………. 2 Trail Usage …………………….………………………………………….……... 5 Trail Issues .…………………………………..…………………………….……. 6 Demographics………… ……………………………….……………………....... 10 Appendix A: Complete Survey Results ……………………………………… 64 Appendix B: Social Media Engagement Report …………….……………….. 66 Bassett Creek Trail Expansion Project Community Input Report Page 2 Overview Soliciting public input was a major component of Three Rivers Park District’s proposal for federal grant money for this project. The City of Golden Valley solicited input from the community through an online survey, social media, and open houses regarding: • how residents currently use the Bassett Creek Trail • benefits to expanding the trail along Golden Valley Rd To promote the survey and open houses, the City published multiple news stories online about the proposed project. All information included links to the online survey while it was active. The City further promoted the survey and open houses through social media posts on Facebook and Twitter. Three Rivers Park District also maintained a webpage dedicated to the project that included details like maps, timelines, open house information, and more. www.letstalkthreerivers.org/bassett-creek-regional-trail-golden-valley-segment Open Houses Dec 19, 2019 Three Rivers Park District, along with the City and Hennepin County, hosted an interactive public forum Dec 19, 2019 at Courage Kenny (3915 Golden Valley Road) where community members could learn more about the project and offer input. Representatives from the City, County, and Three Rivers Park District reviewed corridor sections with attendees and answered questions. Feb 24, 2020 Three Rivers Park District, along with the City and County, hosted a second interactive public forum Feb 24, 2020 at King of Grace Lutheran Church (6000 Duluth Street) where community members could learn more about the project and offer input. Representatives from the City, County, and Three Rivers Park District shared proposed designs and answered questions. Online Survey The survey asked for public input on each of the areas under consideration and asked questions regarding trail usage, current trail issues, and if respondents live or work along Golden Valley Rd. The survey was active from Dec 21–Jan 31, was limited to one response per IP address, and had 146 responses. See full survey responses in Appendix A. Bassett Creek Trail Expansion Project Community Input Report Page 3 Social Media Outreach The City posted information and reminders about the project, open house, and survey multiple times on Facebook and Twitter between Dec 3, 2019 and Feb 20, 2020. See Appendix B for reach and engagement details for each post. Bassett Creek Trail Expansion Project Community Input Report Page 4 Trail Usage What is most important about an off-street, multi-use trail on Golden Valley Rd? Of 146 respondents, the most common answers were Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, Improving the bicycle and pedestrian network, Connecting to other trails and sidewalks, and Solving a safety problem. This question also received five “Other” responses, all of which are compiled below. “Other” Responses Serving more of the city FALSE None None of the above Don’t use GV road !!!! Bassett Creek Trail Expansion Project Community Input Report Page 5 If a multi-use trail is constructed along Golden Valley Rd, how will you use it? Of 145 respondents, 113 (78 percent) answered they use the trail for recreation, 12 (8 percent) said they use the trail to access shopping or other services, and 12 (8 percent) said they will not use the trail. Eight (6 percent) said they will use the trail to get to work. How do you move along Golden Valley Rd now? Of 144 respondents, 91 (63 percent) currently use a car to move along Golden Valley Rd, 27 (19 percent) use a bicycle, and 10 (seven percent) said they walk. This question also received 16 “Other” responses, all of which are compiled below. Bassett Creek Trail Expansion Project Community Input Report Page 6 “Other” Responses I don’t use GV road Do not use GV road All of the above Bike and walk I would use it more bicycling my kids to and from school if it were safer. (That’s for question 2). Now, in winter, we drive. I dont take Bassett Creek Trail any farther east than the bridge over 100 Car and Bicycle All of the above car AND bicycle Walking all of above Motorscooter and car Both car and bike All of th above Car and bike Car or Bicycle Trail Issues What locations along Golden Valley Rd are most difficult to walk or bike through and why? This question was open ended and gathered no statistical data. Bassett Creek Trail Expansion Project Community Input Report Page 7 What locations along along Golden Valley Rd are most difficult to walk or bike through and why? GV Road from 100 to Wirth needs a road diet. Crossing GV RD at Regent I have been just about hit three times by crossing traffic when I have the right of way. Along GV road the bike infrastructure is a joke and the tar curbs are a disgrace. I was astounded that Hennepin C didn't fix that when they did all the work last year The part that goes between Byerlys and Scheid Park, because cars often run the light to make right turns on red. Don’t know, don’t use it ! Byerly’s s Do not like to have to walk on the street/road. At Spring Valley Road, dangerous on and off GV Rd due to speed of traffic on GV Rd and blind spots. Don’t use ....... Golden valley road is very dangerous, fast drivers, those that don’t fully stop, lack of lights. 4 way stop at regent and golden valley rd, crossing golden valley rd very dangerous on a bike. The bridge is not bike accessible to cross The steep hill, I zigzag a bit. Noble and GV road, and up to st marg Mary where the sidewalk is immediately adjacent to the road Crossing under highway 100 on GV Road is very dangerous and difficult. The 4-way stop at Regent and GV Rd can be challenging. The sidewalk conditions along GV Rd vary greatly and can sometimes be poor. East of Douglas The sections that currently do not have bike trail or bike lane. Between Noble and Highway 100 I worry about the pedestrians crossing by the bus stop near Courage Kenny, because there is a hill that limits visibility and people move fast on that road intersection by hwy 100/byerlys Golden Valley Rd where it goes under 100. The road lanes narrow and bike lanes disappear completely in some areas. It is a busy section of road leading to a busy intersection and there are not a lot of other good ways to get under 100 in that area by bike or foot. All of it- people drive fast, they don’t respect bikers, the road was under construction for a long time Near noble and between regent and noble where sidewalk is narrow and golden valley road, also have to cross at noble since sidewalk is only on one side. Very busy crossing for children trying to get to park. Also would like a trail connection to wirth parkway that isn’t along such a busy road. Intersection with Duluth and 100. People coming off the highway don’t look for pedestrians or bicycles. Also just east of spring valley road the south sidewalk is very small. The entire length is dangerous. I have to be on the sidewalk biking with my kids to avoid hazardous driving. And the sidewalk is a minefield of ruts, cracks, narrow spots and debris. Regent to Douglas- heavy traffic forces bikes to use sidewalks. Worry about kids going through those intersections Bassett Creek Trail Expansion Project Community Input Report Page 8 The area west east of 100 - traffic. Section between 100 & Noble Where the path is narrow on the street. Don't want to bike on the sidewalk. Your survey talks about Regent St but isn't it Regent Ave? That's where we live. Not applicable. This serves a small portion of GV. Regent to Noble Hwy 100 area Under highway 100. There are so many cars! Along Unity Ave N because of the roughness of the trail, this portion should be included too! I have problems crossing Hwy 100 at Duluth St. Drivers making a right turn on red often do not look to the right for pedestrians before beginning their turn. There is a lot of traffic on GV road by Schied park and the curve in the road is unnerving...I fear that a distracted driver could beer into the sidewalk. Not any real bad spots.... It is a very busy road with odd sidewalks. It would be nice to have a trail off of the road. Many roads I avoid walking on and wish there were more areas with sidewalks Downtown GV, Duluth St From Duluth street to Noble Ave There is a section of GVR from roughly Noble to Regent on the North side where there is no sidewalk and just a very tiny/narrow shoulder for walking or biking. Narrowed bike lane near Hidden Lakes From Hwy 100 to Theo wirth. The bike lane is either non existent or very tight. Lots of blind spots with the hills and curves. Traffic moves very, very fast. Well, for me, and I live on Olympia & Quebec in GV, I often walk or bike through the neighborhood, and the main place I walk to is the Byerly’s in GV by HW 100. Anything that would improve the pedestrian access to that area AND across HW 100 going towards Teddy Wirth Park would be absolutely amazing to me. I’m continually disappointed that I can’t cross HW 100 on GV Road to get to Teddy Wirth, would love to have like a bike bridge there or something, though I realize that’s not part of what you guys are discussing here. IOW, I am in full support or improving any residential walk/bike access ANYWHERE! The intersection @duluth & 100. No vehicles exiting 100 ever look to see if pedestrians are present making it unsafe to cross. Regent and DULUTH street, traffic heading west are always SPEEDING to beat the next person to the stop light so as to position themselves for a spot to access 100 south. Making access/entry from Toledo nearly impossible. East of Duluth street to Theo wirth. There are too many bike/car conflict points. Courage Center to Scheid Park. Sometimes people park on the shoulders and the separation between cars and bikes is scary. The intersection of GV Rd and Wirth is dangerous for bikers. GV Rd. west of Byerly's is dicey for bikers travelling west. You must share the road with traffic. The underpass from 100 and by the shopping centers. There is just so much traffic. Downtown Golden Valley Bassett Creek Trail Expansion Project Community Input Report Page 9 Regent, Noble, Hidden Lakes Pkwy The bike lane disappears and reappears along the route, making it dangerous and encouraging cyclists to illegally bike on the sidewalk. Otherwise, the sidewalks are generally ok, though the plowing often is pretty poorly done in the winter, leading to dangerously icy and snowy sidewalks. The stretch from Douglas to Regent, because of multiple busy intersections that are dicey you navigate, especially if walking or biking with kids. Lanes are quite narrow near Noble, and traffic is heavy. The part by the church across from fire department on GV Road Theodore Wirth to 100-busy stretch, cars go fast. None of them are difficult to walk or bike through unless the sidewalks haven’t been cleared of snow. This seems like a colossal waste of money and an extreme inconvenience to homeowner and businesses along golden valley road. The unprotected bike lanes and sidewalks are a disaster waiting to happen. With more people distracted on cell phones and driving giant SUV's all it takes is one tiny mistake and you'll end up dead or paralyzed. It's currently not worth the risk. Walkers and bikers should be protected with concrete barriers or plastic barriers at the minimum. If you want people to drive less, become more active, and use alternative transportation, then act like it. West of Noble is weird. Wirth Parkway all the way to the byerlys shopping center. Absolutely no safe way to go under highway 100 - and apparently no way in the proposal! People won!t use it if you can’t get safely past highway 100, Crossing highway exit intersections Section between Douglas and regent is not bike friendly in any way. Ice on the sidewalk under highway 100, no shoulder. Between regent and douglas Hwy100 to Theo Wirth is dangerous to bike along. During the rush hours, I don't feel safe biking along the road from Hwy 100 to Wirth Parkway. I often bike along the sidewalk to make it doable. In particular the segment from Hwy 100 to Noble is bad. I have also had trouble with the 4-way stop at Regent because people don't seem to see a cyclist. As someone who feels largely comfortable biking in the road, I may not be the right person tro answer this question? However, from the project picture at the start of this survey, I think the section under Highway 100 is the most difficult due to turning traffic. Then, Segment 2 is next most difficult given the narrow shoulders. Through golf course, rude to be on sidewalk on bike. Too narrow to safely be on road. From regent to noble, due to curvy road ski drivers don't see a biker well ahead of time. Cycling both directions near Noble are dangerous for limited visibility by vehicles. Bassett Creek Trail Expansion Project Community Input Report Page 10 Demographics Do you live or work along Golden Valley Rd? Of 139 respondents, 50 (36 percent) said they live in Golden Valley, 5 (4 percent) said they work in Golden Valley, and 11 (8 percent) said they both live and work in Golden Valley. Seventy-three (53 percent) said they do not live or work in Golden Valley. APPENDIX A Survey Results Page 11 What is most important to you about an off-street, multi-use trail on Golden Valley Rd? (pick three) If a multi-use trail is constructed along Golden Valley Rd, how will you use it? How do you move along Golden Valley Rd now? What locations along along Golden Valley Rd are most difficult to walk or bike through and why? Do you live or work along Golden Valley Rd? , Solving a safety problem, Providing access for children, seniors, and individuals with disabilities, Improving the bicycle and pedestrian network, To get to work Bicycle GV Road from 100 to Wirth needs a road diet. Crossing GV RD at Regent I have been just about hit three times by crossing traffic when I have the right of way. Along GV road the bike infrastructure is a joke and the tar curbs are a disgrace. I was astounded that Hennepin C didn't fix that when they did all the work last year Live , Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, Solving a safety problem, Serving people without access to vehicles, , For recreation Car Both , Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, Providing access for children, seniors, and individuals with disabilities, Improving the bicycle and pedestrian network, For recreation Car Live , Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, Providing a recreational opportunity, Connecting to other trails and sidewalks, For recreation Car Both , Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, Serving people without access to vehicles, Improving the bicycle and pedestrian network, For recreation Car The part that goes between Byerlys and Scheid Park, because cars often run the light to make right turns on red. Live , Solving a safety problem, , Connecting to other trails and sidewalks, Don’t use GV road !!!! I don’t use GV road Don’t know, don’t use it ! , Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, , For recreation Car , Solving a safety problem, Improving the bicycle and pedestrian network, Connecting to other trails and sidewalks, For recreation Car Live , Connecting to shopping and retail, Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, Solving a safety problem, , For recreation Car Live , Connecting to shopping and retail, Solving a safety problem, Improving the bicycle and pedestrian network, To access shopping or services Car Byerly’s s Both , Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, , Improving the bicycle and pedestrian network, Connecting to other trails and sidewalks, I will not use it Car Neither , Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, Solving a safety problem, , Connecting to other trails and sidewalks, For recreation Car Neither , Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, , Improving the bicycle and pedestrian network, Connecting to other trails and sidewalks, For recreation Car Do not like to have to walk on the street/road. Live , Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, Solving a safety problem, Providing access for children, seniors, and individuals with disabilities, For recreation Walking At Spring Valley Road, dangerous on and off GV Rd due to speed of traffic on GV Rd and blind spots. Live , , , I will not use it Car Neither , Solving a safety problem, , To get to work Bicycle Neither , Solving a safety problem, Serving people without access to vehicles, , Connecting to other trails and sidewalks, I will not use it Do not use GV road Don’t use ....... Neither , , Providing a recreational opportunity, Improving the bicycle and pedestrian network, Connecting to other trails and sidewalks, For recreation Car , Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, Solving a safety problem, Providing access for children, seniors, and individuals with disabilities, For recreation Car Golden valley road is very dangerous, fast drivers, those that don’t fully stop, lack of lights. Live , Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, , Improving the bicycle and pedestrian network, Connecting to other trails and sidewalks, For recreation Car 4 way stop at regent and golden valley rd, crossing golden valley rd very dangerous on a bike. The bridge is not bike accessible to cross Live Providing non-motorized access to/from Courage Kenny, Serving people without access to vehicles, Providing access for children, seniors, and individuals with disabilities, To access shopping or services Bicycle The steep hill, I zigzag a bit. Neither , Solving a safety problem, Providing a recreational opportunity, Providing access for children, seniors, and individuals with disabilities, For recreation All of the above Noble and GV road, and up to st marg Mary where the sidewalk is immediately adjacent to the road Live , Serving people without access to vehicles, Providing access for children, seniors, and individuals For recreation Car Neither with disabilities, Connecting to other trails and sidewalks, , Solving a safety problem, Improving the bicycle and pedestrian network, Connecting to other trails and sidewalks, To access shopping or services Car Crossing under highway 100 on GV Road is very dangerous and difficult. The 4-way stop at Regent and GV Rd can be challenging. The sidewalk conditions along GV Rd vary greatly and can sometimes be poor. Live , Solving a safety problem, Providing a recreational opportunity, Providing access for children, seniors, and individuals with disabilities, For recreation Car Live , Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, Providing a recreational opportunity, Improving the bicycle and pedestrian network, For recreation Car East of Douglas Live , Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, Providing a recreational opportunity, Improving the bicycle and pedestrian network, For recreation Car Neither , , Providing a recreational opportunity, Improving the bicycle and pedestrian network, Connecting to other trails and sidewalks, For recreation Car Neither , Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, Providing a recreational opportunity, Providing access for children, seniors, and individuals with disabilities, For recreation All Live , Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, Solving a safety problem, Improving the bicycle and pedestrian network, For recreation Bicycle The sections that currently do not have bike trail or bike lane. Neither , Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, Solving a safety problem, Providing a recreational opportunity, , For recreation Walking Neither , Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, Providing a recreational opportunity, Connecting to other trails and sidewalks, To get to work Car Live , Solving a safety problem, Serving people without access to vehicles, Providing access for children, seniors, and individuals with disabilities, For recreation Car Live I will not use it Car , Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, , Improving the bicycle and pedestrian network, Connecting to other trails and sidewalks, For recreation Car Neither , Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, Providing access for children, seniors, and individuals with disabilities, Improving the bicycle and pedestrian network, For recreation Bicycle Between Noble and Highway 100 Neither , Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, Providing a recreational opportunity, I will not use it Car Live Connecting to other trails and sidewalks, , Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, , Improving the bicycle and pedestrian network, Connecting to other trails and sidewalks, For recreation Car I worry about the pedestrians crossing by the bus stop near Courage Kenny, because there is a hill that limits visibility and people move fast on that road Neither For recreation , Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, Providing a recreational opportunity, Connecting to other trails and sidewalks, For recreation Car Neither , Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, , Improving the bicycle and pedestrian network, Connecting to other trails and sidewalks, For recreation Car intersection by hwy 100/byerlys Neither , Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, Providing a recreational opportunity, Improving the bicycle and pedestrian network, For recreation Car Neither , Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, Providing a recreational opportunity, Improving the bicycle and pedestrian network, For recreation Bicycle Live , Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park Providing a recreational opportunity, Improving the bicycle and pedestrian network, For recreation Car Live Connecting to other trails and sidewalks, , Solving a safety problem, Providing a recreational opportunity, Improving the bicycle and pedestrian network, For recreation Car Golden Valley Rd where it goes under 100. The road lanes narrow and bike lanes disappear completely in some areas. It is a busy section of road leading to a busy intersection and there are not a lot of other good ways to get under 100 in that area by bike or foot. Neither Serving people without access to vehicles, Providing a recreational opportunity, Connecting to other trails and sidewalks, For recreation Car All of it- people drive fast, they don’t respect bikers, the road was under construction for a long time Neither , Solving a safety problem, Providing access for children, seniors, and individuals with disabilities, Improving the bicycle and pedestrian network, For recreation Bike and walk Near noble and between regent and noble where sidewalk is narrow and golden valley road, also have to cross at noble since sidewalk is only on one side. Very busy crossing for children trying to get to park. Also would like a trail connection to wirth parkway that isn’t along such a busy road. Live , Connecting to shopping and retail, Solving a safety problem, Providing access for children, seniors, and individuals with disabilities, To access shopping or services Car Intersection with Duluth and 100. People coming off the highway don’t look for pedestrians or bicycles. Also just east of spring valley road the south sidewalk is very small. Live , Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, Solving a safety problem, Providing access for children, seniors, and individuals with disabilities For recreation I would use it more bicycling my kids to and from school if it were safer. (That’s for question 2). Now, in winter, we drive. The entire length is dangerous. I have to be on the sidewalk biking with my kids to avoid hazardous driving. And the sidewalk is a minefield of ruts, cracks, narrow spots and debris. Neither , Solving a safety problem, Providing a recreational opportunity, Improving the bicycle and pedestrian network, For recreation Car Regent to Douglas- heavy traffic forces bikes to use sidewalks. Worry about kids going through those intersections Live Providing access for children, seniors, and individuals with disabilities, Improving the bicycle and pedestrian network, Connecting to other trails and sidewalks, For recreation Car Live , Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, Providing a recreational opportunity, Connecting to other trails and sidewalks, For recreation Walking Neither , Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, , Improving the bicycle and pedestrian network, Connecting to other trails and sidewalks, For recreation Car The area west east of 100 - traffic. Neither , Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, , Improving the bicycle and pedestrian network, Connecting to other trails and sidewalks, For recreation Car Section between 100 & Noble Neither , Serving people without access to vehicles, Providing a recreational opportunity, Connecting to other trails and sidewalks, For recreation Car Neither , Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, Providing access for children, seniors, and individuals with disabilities, For recreation Car Neither Improving the bicycle and pedestrian network, Providing a recreational opportunity, Providing access for children, seniors, and individuals with disabilities, Connecting to other trails and sidewalks, For recreation Car Neither , Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, Improving the bicycle and pedestrian network, Connecting to other trails and sidewalks, For recreation Car Where the path is narrow on the street. Don't want to bike on the sidewalk. Your survey talks about Regent St but isn't it Regent Ave? That's where we live. Neither , Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, Solving a safety problem, Providing access for children, seniors, and individuals with disabilities For recreation Bicycle Neither Providing a recreational opportunity, Improving the bicycle and pedestrian network, Connecting to other trails and sidewalks, For recreation Car Live , Connecting to shopping and retail, Connecting to other trails and sidewalks, Serving more of the city I will not use it Car Not applicable. This serves a small portion of GV. Neither , Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, Providing a recreational opportunity, Improving the bicycle and pedestrian network, For recreation Car Live Providing a recreational opportunity, Improving the bicycle and pedestrian network, For recreation Car Regent to Noble Live Connecting to other trails and sidewalks, Providing a recreational opportunity, Improving the bicycle and pedestrian network, Connecting to other trails and sidewalks, For recreation Car Hwy 100 area Neither , Connecting to shopping and retail, Solving a safety problem, Providing access for children, seniors, and individuals with disabilities, I will not use it Car Neither , Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, Providing a recreational opportunity, Improving the bicycle and pedestrian network, For recreation Car Under highway 100. There are so many cars! Live , Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, Improving the bicycle and pedestrian network, Connecting to other trails and sidewalks, For recreation Bicycle Neither , Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, Providing a recreational opportunity, Connecting to other trails and sidewalks, For recreation Car , Solving a safety problem, Providing access for children, seniors, and individuals with disabilities, Improving the bicycle and pedestrian network, For recreation Car Neither , Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, Serving people For recreation I dont take Bassett Creek Along Unity Ave N because of the roughness of the trail, this portion should be included too! Work without access to vehicles, Providing a recreational opportunity, Trail any farther east than the bridge over 100 , Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, Providing a recreational opportunity, Improving the bicycle and pedestrian network, For recreation Car Neither , Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, Providing a recreational opportunity, Connecting to other trails and sidewalks, For recreation Car Neither Providing non-motorized access to/from Courage Kenny, Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, , Improving the bicycle and pedestrian network, To get to work Car Work Solving a safety problem, Providing a recreational opportunity, Connecting to other trails and sidewalks, For recreation Walking I have problems crossing Hwy 100 at Duluth St. Drivers making a right turn on red often do not look to the right for pedestrians before beginning their turn. There is a lot of traffic on GV road by Schied park and the curve in the road is unnerving...I fear that a distracted driver could beer into the sidewalk. Neither Providing non-motorized access to/from Courage Kenny , Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, Solving a safety problem, Improving the bicycle and pedestrian network, For recreation Bicycle Not any real bad spots.... Live , Serving people without access to vehicles, Providing a recreational opportunity, Providing access for children, seniors, and individuals with disabilities For recreation Car Neither , Providing a recreational opportunity, Connecting to job centers, Connecting to other trails and sidewalks, For recreation Car It is a very busy road with odd sidewalks. It would be nice to have a trail off of the road. Live , Solving a safety problem, Providing access for children, seniors, and individuals with disabilities, Improving the bicycle and pedestrian network, To access shopping or services Car Many roads I avoid walking on and wish there were more areas with sidewalks Live , Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, Solving a safety problem, Providing access for children, seniors, and individuals with disabilities, For recreation Car Downtown GV, Duluth St Neither , Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, , Improving the bicycle and pedestrian network, Connecting to other trails and sidewalks, For recreation Car Both , Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, Solving a safety problem, Improving the bicycle and pedestrian network, I will not use it Car Live , Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, Providing access for children, seniors, and individuals with disabilities, For recreation Car Live Connecting to other trails and sidewalks, , Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, , Improving the bicycle and pedestrian network, Connecting to other trails and sidewalks, For recreation Car From Duluth street to Noble Ave Live , Solving a safety problem, , , , Providing a recreational opportunity, Improving the bicycle and pedestrian network, Connecting to other trails and sidewalks, For recreation Car Neither , Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, Solving a safety problem, Improving the bicycle and pedestrian network, For recreation Car There is a section of GVR from roughly Noble to Regent on the North side where there is no sidewalk and just a very tiny/narrow shoulder for walking or biking. Live , Connecting to shopping and retail, Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, Solving a safety problem, , To access shopping or services Car Narrowed bike lane near Hidden Lakes Live , Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, Solving a safety problem, Improving the bicycle and pedestrian network, For recreation Car Neither , Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, Providing a recreational opportunity, Connecting to job centers, For recreation Car Neither , Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, Providing a recreational opportunity, Improving the bicycle and pedestrian network, For recreation Bicycle Both , Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, Solving a safety problem, Improving the bicycle and pedestrian network, For recreation Car and Bicycle From Hwy 100 to Theo wirth. The bike lane is either non existent or very tight. Lots of blind spots with the hills and curves. Traffic moves very, very fast. Neither , , Providing a recreational opportunity, Improving the bicycle and pedestrian network, Connecting to other trails and sidewalks, For recreation Car Neither , Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, Providing a recreational opportunity, Improving the bicycle and pedestrian network, For recreation Walking Well, for me, and I live on Olympia & Quebec in GV, I often walk or bike through the neighborhood, and the main place I walk to is the Byerly’s in GV by HW 100. Anything that would improve the pedestrian access to that area AND across HW 100 going towards Teddy Wirth Park would be absolutely amazing to me. I’m continually disappointed that I can’t cross HW 100 on GV Road to get to Teddy Wirth, would love to have like a bike bridge there or something, though I realize that’s not part of what you guys are discussing here. IOW, I am in full support or improving any residential walk/bike access ANYWHERE! Neither , Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, Solving a safety problem, Providing a recreational opportunity, , For recreation Car The intersection @duluth & 100. No vehicles exiting 100 ever look to see if pedestrians are present making it unsafe to cross. Regent and DULUTH street, traffic heading west are always SPEEDING to beat the next person to the stop light so as to position themselves for a spot to access 100 south. Making access/entry from Toledo nearly impossible. Both , Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, Providing a recreational opportunity, Improving the bicycle and pedestrian network, For recreation Bicycle Neither , Solving a safety problem, Providing a recreational opportunity, Improving the bicycle and pedestrian network, For recreation Car Neither , Solving a safety problem, Serving people without access to vehicles, Improving the bicycle and pedestrian network, For recreation Car East of Duluth street to Theo wirth. There are too many bike/car conflict points. Neither , Serving people without access to vehicles, Providing a recreational opportunity, Improving the bicycle and pedestrian network, For recreation Car Work , Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, Solving a safety problem, , Connecting to other trails and sidewalks, For recreation Bicycle Neither , Connecting to shopping and retail, Solving a safety problem, Improving the bicycle and pedestrian network, To access shopping or services Car Courage Center to Scheid Park. Sometimes people park on the shoulders and the separation between cars and bikes is scary. Live , Solving a safety problem, Providing access for children, seniors, and individuals with disabilities, Improving the bicycle and pedestrian network, To access shopping or services All of the above The intersection of GV Rd and Wirth is dangerous for bikers. GV Rd. west of Byerly's is dicey for bikers travelling west. You must share the road with traffic. Neither , Connecting to shopping and retail, Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, , Connecting to job centers, FALSE To get to work Car The underpass from 100 and by the shopping centers. There is just so much traffic. Live , , Improving the bicycle and pedestrian network, None For recreation Walking Downtown Golden Valley Both , Connecting to shopping and retail, Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, Serving people without access to vehicles, , For recreation Walking Live , , Providing a recreational opportunity, Providing access for children, seniors, and individuals with disabilities, Connecting to other trails and sidewalks, , Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, Providing a recreational opportunity, Improving the bicycle and pedestrian network, For recreation Car Regent, Noble, Hidden Lakes Pkwy Neither , Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, Serving people without access to vehicles, Improving the bicycle and pedestrian network, For recreation Car Neither , Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, Providing access for children, seniors, and individuals with disabilities, Connecting to other trails and sidewalks, For recreation Walking Neither , Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, Providing a recreational opportunity, For recreation Car The bike lane disappears and reappears along the route, making it dangerous and encouraging cyclists to illegally bike on the sidewalk. Live Connecting to other trails and sidewalks, Otherwise, the sidewalks are generally ok, though the plowing often is pretty poorly done in the winter, leading to dangerously icy and snowy sidewalks. , Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, Providing a recreational opportunity, Connecting to other trails and sidewalks, For recreation Car The stretch from Douglas to Regent, because of multiple busy intersections that are dicey you navigate, especially if walking or biking with kids. Both , Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, Providing a recreational opportunity, Connecting to other trails and sidewalks, For recreation car AND bicycle Lanes are quite narrow near Noble, and traffic is heavy. Neither , Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, Providing a recreational opportunity, Improving the bicycle and pedestrian network, For recreation Bicycle The part by the church Neither , Serving people without access to vehicles, Providing access for children, seniors, and individuals with disabilities, Connecting to other trails and sidewalks, For recreation Car across from fire department on GV Road Neither Providing non-motorized access to/from Courage Kenny, , Providing a recreational opportunity, Improving the bicycle and pedestrian network, For recreation Walking Live , Solving a safety problem, Improving the bicycle and pedestrian network, Connecting to other trails and sidewalks, For recreation all of above Theodore Wirth to 100-busy stretch, cars go fast. Both , , Providing a recreational opportunity, Improving the bicycle and pedestrian network, Connecting to other trails and sidewalks, For recreation Car None of them are difficult to walk or bike through unless the sidewalks haven’t been cleared of snow. This seems like a colossal waste of money and an extreme inconvenience to homeowner and businesses along golden valley road. Live , Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, Providing a recreational opportunity, Improving the bicycle and pedestrian network, For recreation Car Neither , Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, Solving a safety problem, , Connecting to other trails and sidewalks, For recreation Walking Neither , Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, Solving a safety problem, Providing a recreational opportunity, , For recreation Bicycle The unprotected bike lanes and sidewalks are a disaster waiting to happen. With more people distracted on cell phones and driving giant SUV's all it takes is one tiny mistake and you'll end up dead or paralyzed. It's currently not worth the risk. Walkers and bikers should be protected with concrete barriers or plastic barriers at the minimum. If you want people to drive less, become more active, and use alternative transportation, then act like it. Both , Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, Serving people without access to vehicles, , Connecting to other trails and sidewalks, To get to work Bicycle West of Noble is weird. Neither , , , I will not use it Car Work , Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, , Improving the bicycle and pedestrian network, For recreation Car Wirth Parkway all the way to the byerlys shopping center. Absolutely no safe way to go under highway 100 - and apparently no way in the Live Connecting to other trails and sidewalks, proposal! People won!t use it if you can’t get safely past highway 100, Providing non-motorized access to/from Courage Kenny, Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, , Improving the bicycle and pedestrian network, For recreation Bicycle Neither , Serving people without access to vehicles, Providing a recreational opportunity, Providing access for children, seniors, and individuals with disabilities, For recreation Motorscoote r and car Crossing highway exit intersections Live , Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, , Improving the bicycle and pedestrian network, For recreation Car Neither , Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, Solving a safety problem, Providing a recreational opportunity, , For recreation Bicycle Neither , , , None of the above I will not use it Car Live , Solving a safety problem, Serving people without access to vehicles, Improving the bicycle and pedestrian network, For recreation Bicycle Neither , Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, Providing a recreational opportunity, Improving the bicycle and pedestrian network, For recreation Both car and bike Section between Douglas and regent is not bike friendly in any way. Ice on the sidewalk under highway 100, no shoulder. Both , Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, Solving a safety problem, , Connecting to other trails and sidewalks, For recreation Bicycle Neither , Solving a safety problem, Improving the bicycle and pedestrian network, Connecting to other trails and sidewalks, For recreation Bicycle Between regent and douglas Live , Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, Solving a safety problem, Improving the bicycle and pedestrian network, For recreation Car Neither , Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, , Improving the bicycle and pedestrian network, Connecting to job centers, For recreation Car Live , Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, Solving a safety problem, Serving people without access to vehicles, , For recreation Bicycle Neither , Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, Solving a safety problem, , Connecting to other trails and sidewalks, For recreation Bicycle Hwy100 to Theo Wirth is dangerous to bike along. Live , Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, , Improving the bicycle and pedestrian network, Connecting to other trails and sidewalks, For recreation Car Neither , Solving a safety problem, Improving the bicycle and pedestrian network, Connecting to job centers, To get to work Car During the rush hours, I don't feel safe biking along the road from Hwy 100 to Wirth Parkway. I often bike along the sidewalk to make it doable. In particular the segment from Hwy 100 to Noble is bad. I have also had trouble with the 4-way stop at Regent because people don't seem to see a cyclist. Neither , Connecting to shopping and retail, , Improving the bicycle and pedestrian network, To get to work Bicycle As someone who feels largely comfortable biking in the road, I may not be the right person tro answer this question? However, from the project Neither Connecting to other trails and sidewalks, picture at the start of this survey, I think the section under Highway 100 is the most difficult due to turning traffic. Then, Segment 2 is next most difficult given the narrow shoulders. , Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, , Improving the bicycle and pedestrian network, Connecting to other trails and sidewalks, To access shopping or services Bicycle Work , Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, , Improving the bicycle and pedestrian network, Connecting to other trails and sidewalks, For recreation Bicycle Neither , Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, Serving people without access to vehicles, Improving the bicycle and pedestrian network, To access shopping or services , Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, Solving a safety problem, Improving the bicycle and pedestrian network, For recreation Bicycle Live , Connecting to shopping and retail, Providing a recreational opportunity, Connecting to other trails and sidewalks, To access shopping or services All of th above Through golf course, rude to be on sidewalk on bike. Too narrow to safely be on road. Live , Serving people without access to vehicles, Providing access for children, seniors, and individuals with disabilities, Improving the bicycle and pedestrian network, To access shopping or services Bicycle Neither , Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, Providing a For recreation Car and bike From regent to noble, due to curvy road ski drivers don't see a biker well ahead of time. Neither recreational opportunity, Providing access for children, seniors, and individuals with disabilities, , , Improving the bicycle and pedestrian network, I will not use it Car Neither , Solving a safety problem, Providing access for children, seniors, and individuals with disabilities, Improving the bicycle and pedestrian network, For recreation Car or Bicycle Cycling both directions near Noble are dangerous for limited visibility by vehicles. Neither , Connecting to shopping and retail, Connecting to Theodore Wirth Regional Park, , Connecting to job centers, I will not use it Car Live APPENDIX B Social Media Engagement Page 35 SOCIAL MEDIA REACH AND ENGAGEMENT Title Reach = Number of people who saw the post Engagement = Number of people who interacted with the post Dec 3, 2019 PLATFORM REACH ENGAGEMENT LIKES SHARES/RETWEETS COMMENTS Facebook 1068 154 6 2 0 Twitter 428 7 0 0 0 Dec 21, 2019 PLATFORM REACH ENGAGEMENT LIKES SHARES/RETWEETS COMMENTS Facebook 980 58 6 2 0 Twitter 294 10 0 0 0 Dec 30, 2019 PLATFORM REACH ENGAGEMENT LIKES SHARES/RETWEETS COMMENTS Facebook 1466 218 1 4 0 Twitter 301 19 0 0 0 Jan 4, 2020 PLATFORM REACH ENGAGEMENT LIKES SHARES/RETWEETS COMMENTS Facebook 940 44 2 2 0 Twitter 358 10 0 0 0 Jan 10, 2020 PLATFORM REACH ENGAGEMENT LIKES SHARES/RETWEETS COMMENTS Facebook 1789 131 3 1 0 Twitter 364 5 0 0 0 Jan 23, 2020 PLATFORM REACH ENGAGEMENT LIKES SHARES/RETWEETS COMMENTS Facebook 879 38 7 1 0 Twitter 182 6 1 0 0 Comments NAME COMMENT Golden Valley Council/Manager Meeting May 12, 2020 Agenda Item 4. Financial Impact of COVID-19 Revenues and Expenditures Prepared By Sue Virnig, Finance Director Summary COVID-19 has had significant impact on the City of Golden Valley’s 2020 revenues due to stay at home orders, business closures, social distancing guidelines, disruption to the economy and uncertainty of future needs. Future budgets will be impacted too. Council needs to be informed of this impact. At its meeting on May 12, staff will review the attached financial reports. Staff has searched for many financial tools such as FEMA Disaster grants, Hennepin County grants, State Grants, and Federal CARES Act. The State will allocate MN Coronavirus Relief Funds (CARES) to local governments for reimbursements and are reviewing two options for allocations. Staff has also worked with the League of Minnesota Cities (LMC), Municipal Legislative Commission (MLC), and various professional organizations on surveys and information sharing on COVID-19 impacts. The 2021-2022 Budget process has begun and will be brought to you in August. Financial Or Budget Considerations The impact of COVID-19 has significant impact on the City of Golden Valley’s loss of revenues and additional expenditures. Supporting Documents • Impacts on 2020 Budget through 05-07-2020 (3 pages) • MLC report on Financial Impacts to Cities Template (1 page) 2019 Unassigned Fund Balance 1,350,000 General Fund Revenues compared to 4-30-19: Building Permits (86,963)less Fines and Forfeitures (19,265)less Public Safety Revenues (17,657)less Public Works Revenues (35,639)less Park & Rec Revenues (27,315)less Construction Fund Charges (9,735)less Additional Expenditures: COVID Related Supplies YTD PPE (35,100)more expenditures $37,325 Cleaning Supplies (10,200)more expenditures Computer/IT Needs (25,100)more expenditures PTO/Vacation/OT Extension (60,000)more expenditures end 12-31 Unknown: Property Tax Delays Property Tax Petitions Permits and Licenses current level is same as 4-30-2019 Park & Rec Fees cancellation of rentals and programs Lodging Tax Revenue March report - Due late April Pull Tab Revenues Human Service Commission Unemployment Claims Golf, Brookview, others Interest Earnings Utility Billing Penalties Financial Update FY2020 Enterprise Funds Water & Sewer Utility (822,020)expected due to projects; time of year Brookview Golf Course Impacts on 2020 Budget (05-07-2020) Three One Six (88,917)Shortfall Golf Course (335,655)Opened April 18 TOTAL (424,572)fund balance is $860,903 Motor Vehicle Licensing (22,895)fund balance is $903,508 Recycling (3,787)expected shortfall for 2020 budget Storm Water 227,430 expected due to projects; time of year Special Revenue Funds Brookview Facility/Backyard (53,045)fund balance is $362,475 Human Services Commission will only give out what they can Projects Delayed: City Website 53,960 Managers Department-General Fund Pavement Markings 27,500 Street Maintenance-General Fund Crack Sealing 52,500 Street Maintenance-General Fund Concrete Shaving 10,000 Street Maintenance-General Fund Pavement Preservation 52,500 Street Maintenance-General Fund Bassett Creek Regional Trail Storm Sewer 50,000 Storm Sewer Inspect and Maintain Large Diameter Storm Sewers 300,000 Storm Sewer 2020 PMP Delayed -Storm Water Portion 750,000 Storm Sewer Bike Lane Project (2019-2020)475,000 Street Pavement Management Overlays 500,000 Street 2020 PMP Delayed 3,100,000 Street Streetscape and City Hall Complex Renovation 200,000 Street Retaining Wall Repairs 100,000 Street Pavement Surface Treatments 100,000 Street Sidewalk Maintenance 50,000 Street Park Signage 3,000 Parks Community Gardens 30,000 Parks Off Leash Pet Area 60,000 Parks Range Nets 110,000 Golf Internal Repairs 5,000 Brookview Facility Brookview Lighting-Low Voltage Repairs 5,000 Brookview Facility Hydrant Painting 20,000 Water and Sewer 2020 PMP-Water & Sewer Portion 1,100,000 Water and Sewer (delayed) Total Projects Delayed 7,154,460 Positions Delayed: Equity Manager (full time)103,660 *w/benefits Building Inspector (full time)89,000 *w/benefits Seasonal PW employees 110,010 * Accounting Intern 9,600 * Park & Recreation Intern 7,770 * Facilities Coordinator (.75)36,000 ended employment 03-12-2020 (April thru December) Community Development Intern 7,980 Storm Water Intern 15,960 Brooklynk 50,000 * Housing/ED manager-2021 (full time) 145,000 Total Savings of Positions Delayed 429,980 Entire 2020 Year Projected COVID-19 Financial Impacts to Cities - Template Desciptions can be added to the bottom the template as needed City Property Taxes* Development Revenue Other (Permits/Fees Please Describe) Program Income Fines and Fees(Court Fines/Citations, Other-Please Describe) Licencing (Alcohol, Other-Please Describe) Special Sales & Use Tax Lodging Tax EMS Utility Water Utility Waste Water Other (Please Describe) Other (Please Describe) Total Estimated Impact Apple Valley 821400 400000 4750 350000 75000 27400 1125 350000 $2,029,675 Bloomington 1940696 812825 857470 500000 243258 1275000 7650000 1203000 1497000 286606 50000 $16,315,855 Burnsville $0 Chanhassen 275000 400000 300000 75000 25000 15000 300000 175000 40000 $1,605,000 Eagan 1000000 200000 70000 25000 15000 15000 300000 $1,625,000 Eden Prairie 1127241 600000 100000 30000 $1,857,241 Edina 2000000 60000 475000 300000 60000 330000 5200000 100000 $8,525,000 Golden Valley 785903 500000 353000 490000 150000 50000 9000 100000 150000 650000 $3,237,903 Inver Grove Heights $0 Lakeville 960930 50000 141000 200000 39070 172860 209070 85000 274000 $2,131,930 Maple Grove $0 Minnetonka 1230000 432000 314000 55000 170000 170000 520000 192000 $3,083,000 Plymouth $0 Prior Lake 130000 377000 13000 107000 $627,000 Rosemount 321930 195050 60600 16500 6500 7000 3000 $610,580 Savage 582830 390944 1056485 175145 37636 350000 300000 392532 643691 $3,929,263 Shakopee 621915 650000 30146 See Comment 150000 $1,452,061 Shoreview 392400 74000 1654000 6000 7000 $2,133,400 Woodbury $0 AVERAGE ALL $2,587,521 * Expect 3% of Property Taxes to be deferred Rec program revenue loss Golf Course - Column O REGULAR MEETING AGENDA This meeting will be held via Webex in accordance with the local emergency declaration made by the City under Minn. Stat. § 12.37. The public may monitor this meeting by watching on Comcast cable channel 16, by streaming on CCXmedia.org, or by calling 1-415-655-0001 and entering the meeting code ( ). The public may participate in this meeting during public comment sections, including the public forum beginning at 6:20 pm, by calling 763-230-7454. Additional information about monitoring electronic meetings is available on the City website. For technical assistance, please contact the City at 763-593-8007 or webexsupport@goldenvalleymn.gov. If you incur costs to call into the meeting, you may submit the costs to the City for reimbursement consideration. 1.Call to Order A.Pledge of Allegiance Pages B.Roll Call 2.Additions and Corrections to Agenda 3.Consent Agenda Approval of Consent Agenda - All items listed under this heading are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no discussion of these items unless a Council Member so requests in which event the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda. A.Approval of Minutes: 1.City Council Meeting – May 5, 2020 B.Approval of City Check Register C.Licenses: 1.Approve MicroMobility licenses 2.Approve On-Sale Wine and 3.2 Malt Liquor License – Mill Valley Market D.Minutes of Boards and Commissions: 1.Civil Service Commission – February 3, 2020 E.Approval of Bids, Quotes and Contracts: 1.Award Contract to Contractor for Pennsylvania Woods Habitat Restoration 2.Approve Public Trailway Permanent Irrevocable Permit with Three Rivers Park District 3.Award Welcome Avenue Sanitary Sewer Extension Project F.Acceptance of Grants and Donations: 1. G.Accept Environmental Commission 2019 Annual Report and Approve 2020 Work Plan H.Accept Planning Commission 2019 Annual Report and Approve 2020 Work plan I.Accept Board of Zoning Authority Commission 2019 Annual Report May 19, 2020 – 6:30 pm DRAFT City of Golden Valley City Council Regular Meeting May 19, 2020 – 6:30 pm 2 4. Public Hearing 5. Old Business 6. New Business All Ordinances listed under this heading are eligible for public input. A. First Consideration - Environment Commission Ordinance Amendment B. COVID-19 Pandemic Emergency Administrative Actions C. Review of Council Calendar D. Mayor and Council Communications 1. Other Committee/Meeting updates 7. Adjournment DRAFT REGULAR MEETING AGENDA 1.Call to Order A.Pledge of Allegiance Pages B.Roll Call 2.Additions and Corrections to Agenda 3.Consent Agenda Approval of Consent Agenda ‐ All items listed under this heading are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no discussion of these items unless a Council Member so requests in which event the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda. A.Approval of Minutes: 1.City Council Meeting – May 19, 2020 B.Approval of City Check Register C.Licenses: 1. 2020‐2021 Liquor License Renewals D.Minutes of Boards and Commissions: E.Approval of Bids, Quotes and Contracts: 1.Approve Professional Services to Update City's 5‐Year MS4 Stormwater Permit F.Acceptance of Grants and Donations: 1. 4.Public Hearing A.Public Hearing – Schuller’s – Reguiding/Rezoning B.Public Hearing ‐ MS4 General Permit, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program, Annual Report to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Res. 20‐ 5.Old Business 6.New Business All Ordinances listed under this heading are eligible for public input. A.Second Consideration ‐ Environment Commission Ordinance Amendment B.Review of Council Calendar C.Mayor and Council Communications 1.Other Committee/Meeting updates 7.Adjournment June 2, 2020 – 6:30 pm Council Chambers Golden Valley City Hall 7800 Golden Valley Road DRAFT WORK SESSION AGENDA Pages 1.Update on TIF Districts 2.Adjournment June 9, 2020 – 6:30 pm Council Conference Room Golden Valley City Hall 7800 Golden Valley Road DRAFT REGULAR MEETING AGENDA Pages 1.Rising TIDES Update 2.CAFR Report-Auditors 3.Curbside Organics Discussion 4.Facilities and Downtown Study Discussion 5.2020 Budget Update 6.Council Review of Future Draft Agendas: City Council June 16, City Council July 7, and Council/Manager July 14, 2020 Council/Manager meetings have an informal, discussion-style format and are designed for the Council to obtain background information, consider policy alternatives, and provide general directions to staff. No formal actions are taken at these meetings. The public is invited to attend Council/Manager meetings and listen to the discussion; public participation is allowed by invitation of the City Council. June 9, 2020 – Immediately following HRA Work Session Council Conference Room Golden Valley City Hall 7800 Golden Valley Road DRAFT