pc-agenda-may-27-20
REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
This meeting will be held via Webex in accordance with the local emergency declaration made by the
City under Minn. Stat. § 12.37. The public may monitor this meeting by watching on Comcast cable
channel 16, by streaming on CCXmedia.org, or by calling 1‐415‐655‐0001 and entering the meeting
code 284 626 230. The public may participate in this meeting during public comment sections by
calling 763‐230‐7454 and following the prompts.
Additional information about monitoring electronic meetings is available on the City website. For
technical assistance, please contact the City at 763‐593‐8007 or webexsupport@goldenvalleymn.gov.
If you incur costs to call into the meeting, you may submit the costs to the City for reimbursement
consideration.
1. Call to Order
2. Approval of Agenda
3. Approval of Minutes
May 11, 2020, Regular Planning Commission Meeting
4. Informal Public Hearing – Zoning Code Text Amendment
Applicant: City of Golden Valley
Purpose: Amending zoning districts to regulate tobacco sales
– End of Televised Portion of Meeting –
To listen to this portion, please call 1‐415‐655‐0001 and enter meeting access code 284 626 230
5. Council Liaison Report
6. Reports on Meetings of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority, City Council, Board of Zoning
Appeals, and other meetings
7. Other Business
8. Adjournment
May 27, 2020 – 7 pm
REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
This meeting was held via Webex in accordance with the local emergency declaration made by
the City under Minn. Stat. § 12.37. In accordance with that declaration, beginning on March 16,
2020, all Planning Commission meetings held during the emergency were conducted
electronically. The City used Webex to conduct this meeting and members of the public were
able to monitor the meetings by watching it on Comcast cable channel 16, by streaming it on
CCXmedia.org, or by dialing in to the public call‐in line. The public was able to participate in this
meeting during public comment sections, by dialing the public call‐in line.
1. Call to Order
The meeting was called to order at 7:05 by Chair Blum.
Roll Call
Commissioners present: Rich Baker, Ron Blum, Adam Brookins, Andy Johnson, Lauren Pockl, Ryan
Sadeghi, Chuck Segelbaum,
Commissioners absent: Ari Prohofsky
Staff present: Jason Zimmerman – Planning Manager
Council Liaison present: Gillian Rosenquist
2. Approval of Agenda
Chair Blum, asked for a motion to approve the agenda.
MOTION made by Commissioner Brookins, seconded by Commissioner Segelbaum to approve the
agenda of May 11, 2020, as submitted. Staff called a roll call vote and the motion carried unanimously.
3. Approval of Minutes
Chair Blum made a correction to the minutes from the April 27, 2020 meeting and assuming those
corrections were made, asked for a motion to approve the minutes from April 27, 2020.
MOTION made by Commissioner Brookins, seconded by Commissioner Johnson to approve the
meeting minutes, after the correction was made, from April 27, 2020. Staff called a roll call vote
and the motion carried unanimously.
4. Informal Public Hearing – Amendment to Future Land Use Map
Applicant: Paul Jacob
Address: 7345 Country Club Drive
Purpose: To modify the guided land use from Low Density Residential to Retail/Service
[ITEM 4 & 5 ARE PRESENTED TOGETHER]
May 11, 2020 – 7 pm
City of Golden Valley Planning Commission Regular Meeting
April 27, 2020 – 7 pm
2
5. Informal Public Hearing – Amendment to Zoning Map
Applicant: Paul Jacob
Address: 7345 Country Club Drive
Purpose: To modify the zoning designation from Single‐Family Residential (R‐1)
to Commercial
Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager, started by explaining the proposal by the applicant to amend
the Future Land Use Map which would be a modification of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. This
amendment changes the land‐use designation from Low Density Residential to Retail/Service. The
applicant’s second proposal was to amend the Zoning Map in order to rezone Schuller’s. This
amendment would change the zoning from Single‐Family Residential to Commercial. The elements of
the proposal have an end goal of creating an outdoor patio for customers. Adding the patio qualifies
as an expansion and in order to do so, zoning and land use designations must be changed as the
current non‐conforming statute allows use to continue but not expansion.
By way of background, Zimmerman explained Schuller’s is a bar/restaurant, operating at its current
location for decades and is considered non‐conforming. The guided land use has been designated as
a Single‐Family or Low Density Residential since at least 1977. A zoning map from the first part of
1956 shows the property zoned as commercial, but later that year it was rezoned to a Single‐Family
Residential (R‐1).
Zimmerman reminded the Commissioners that Schuller’s made a similar request in 2012, the
Planning Commission recommended denial and City Council tabled the item and did not vote. In 2013
the City Council discussed the change and did not support it. In 2014 the Council supported moving
forward but there was not an application submitted.
Moving on to the steps in the process, Zimmerman stated that if the land use change was approved
by the City, it must follow these next steps:
1. Be approved by the Metropolitan Council as a Comprehensive Plan amendment.
2. Once Met. Council grants approval, the zoning change may occur.
3. Then a CUP is needed which may then set additional regulations on setbacks, hours,
noise, etc
4. Variances would be needed for existing setbacks as well as for the new patio.
Zimmerman informed the group on the neighbor notification process for this proposal and typically
that includes a neighborhood meeting. Current Covid‐19 restrictions discouraged this and a
neighborhood mailing was sent instead with an extended comment period. Planning staff received
three emails and two phone calls.
Zimmerman expanded on the zoning and land use definitions as well as the idea of “spot‐zoning”.
Regarding Land Use changes, there aren’t specific standards outlined in the City Code but the City
City of Golden Valley Planning Commission Regular Meeting
April 27, 2020 – 7 pm
3
Attorney urges the Planning Commission to consider land‐use descriptions that are contained in the
comprehensive plan. When looking at the zoning changes, the City Attorney urges the Commissioners
to consider the purpose of the Zoning Chapter to regulate land use … for the purpose of promoting the
health, safety, order, convenience, and general welfare of all citizens of the City.
Staff has two primary concerns regarding this proposal:
1. The construction of an outdoor patio in a primarily single‐family neighborhood increases the
likelihood of complaints related to noise, lights, traffic, etc.
2. Potential changes would not be limited to Schuller’s, but would include any other future
Permitted or Conditional Use in the Commercial Zoning District
Aside from that, changing the land use does not appear to be consistent with the following Comp. Plan
goals and objectives:
Minimizing Conflicts and Impacts of Change (Land Use Chapter, Goal 2)
Protecting Existing Residential Neighborhoods (Objective 1)
Supporting Non‐residential Growth Opportunities while Respecting Adjacent Properties
(Objective 2)
Being that the request to change the land use designation of the property from Low Density Residential
to Retail/Service would be inconsistent with the goals and objectives of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan,
staff recommends denial.
Being that the request to rezone the property from Single‐Family Residential (R‐1) to Commercial
would likely introduce significant impacts to surrounding properties, staff recommends denial.
Commissioner Baker asked staff how often Land Use and Zoning Changes were approved and what
the conditions were. Zimmerman responded that there have been about six or so approved and it was
generally to accommodate a use for the area that wasn’t considered before. Those that were denied,
were generally because an applicant wanted to create something new and change a use all together.
Commissioner Johnson asked what the maximum height is for a structure in the rezoning proposal.
Zimmerman responded that it’s about 2‐3 stories, not much taller than the single‐family zoning allows.
Paul Jacob, Applicant, is the son of the previous owner of 30 years. Jacob stated that Schuller’s loses
about 30% of their business in the summer and it seems to be due to lack of outside patio seating.
Recently renovations have taken place to help upgrade the building and the owners would like to
continue business at the current location. Jacob said they’re willing to make accommodations to
reduce noise in order to obtain a patio. Given the current social distancing requirements, the owners
feel that once customers are allowed to go to restaurants again, folks will feel the most comfortable
with outdoor seating. Being that they can’t offer that at all, the owners are concerned for the future
of Schuller’s.
Commissioner Segelbaum asked the applicants if they had comments regarding staff concern over re‐
zoning and opening the door for another restaurant to open in the future. The applicants responded
City of Golden Valley Planning Commission Regular Meeting
April 27, 2020 – 7 pm
4
that their goal was not to rezone but it was part of the process they needed to follow in order to expand
and build a patio. They also restated their desire to keep Schuller’s.
Chair Blum opened the informal public hearing at 7:32pm.
Caller 1: Peter Pluvak, 510 Kelley Drive
Would like the Commission to recommend denial of the proposal and is concerned about the
increased traffic to the restaurant and the danger that will lead to residents.
Caller 2: John Ebber 7421 Glenwood Ave
Stated that the neighborhood is low density residential and is in the 2040 Comprehensive
Plan as such. Caller is concerned this is spot zoning and is inconsistent with the land use and
zoning maps. Economic considerations are enough to constitute a rezoning, as he said was
stated by the BZA. Resident encouraged the Commission to recommend denial to the City
Council.
Caller 3: Ben Harkins 7028 Schuller Circle
Caller doesn’t feel the plan serves the neighborhood and appears to have negative impact.
He also stated that he doesn’t understand how a blocked off or sheltered patio will be
desirable to patrons. Caller is also concerned with the increased traffic, noise and is very
concerned about the business being sold and another, larger establishment takes root.
Chair Blum closed the public hearing at 7:42pm.
Chair Blum asked staff about the applicants offer to create conditions tied to their patio proposal.
Zimmerman responded that conditions can’t be tied to a land use or a rezoning request but rather to
a CUP once the former is approved.
Commissioner Pockl asked the applicants if there have been changes since the 2012 denial that
promotes the request a second time. The applicant responded that it’s part of their improvement
process. By doing other work and investing in to the building, they were hoping to show the City that
they’re committed to staying in the building and to keep Schuller’s running. Pockl asked if there were
more upgrades planned. Applicant responded that they already made a few upgrades: new ceiling,
new booths, new windows, made the entrance handicap accessible. Pockl asked if they’ve experienced
people parking outside of the parking lot when busy. The applicant responded that it has happened
but it’s really rare and the few added seats that the patio will provide, wouldn’t make a noticeable
traffic impact. Commissioner Brookins asked if there was another zoning type that would be a better
fit. Zimmerman stated Commercial was the best for a bar restaurant, mixed‐use is possible but it opens
the door to even more possible future uses.
Chair Blum stated that after reviewing the items and regulations, he’s in favor of recommending denial
as the location is in a clearly defined residential area. Commissioner Segelbaum stated that while he’s
sensitive to the applicant as a business owner, the area is clearly residential and not an appropriate
location for a commercial/retail district. Commissioner Johnson sited staff’s presentation and stated
that he feels rezoning this location is inconsistent with the surrounding area. Commissioner Baker
echoed these comments. Pockl stated that this will be spot zoning and doing so is not reasonably
City of Golden Valley Planning Commission Regular Meeting
April 27, 2020 – 7 pm
5
related to public health, safety, morals, and welfare, therefore she is in support of recommending
denial.
MOTION made by Commissioner Segelbaum to recommend denial to both items:
1. Amendment to Future Land Use Map ‐ To modify the guided land use from Low Density
Residential to Retail/Service
2. Amendment to Zoning Map ‐ To modify the zoning designation from Single‐Family Residential
(R‐1) to Commercial
Commissioner Baker made a second on the motion
Staff called a roll call vote for each motion and the both passed unanimously.
6. Narrow Lots – Discussion
Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager, reviewed the narrow lot discussion thus far and informed the
Commissioners on the City’s strategic plan moving forward. Considering the possibility of the formal
public hearing being via Webex, the Communications team will be creating online resources for
residents to gather information, pose questions to staff, and make public comment. This added
resource will help alleviate public comment congestion on the call in line when the meeting takes place.
Zimmerman started his presentation by giving a review of past meetings, recommendations, and the
nine proposed changes made at the March 9th meeting.
“Menu” of Proposed Changes
1. Minimum side yard setback of 5 feet
2. Allow one‐car garages for lots 50 feet in width or less; limit garage width to 65% of façade
3. Set vertical:horizontal slope of “tent” portion of building envelope to 2:1
4. Lower wall height at side setback line to 13 feet
5. Allow second story dormers to extend outside building envelope
6. Prohibit side wall articulation from extending into side yard setback; no principal structures
within 5 feet of property line
7. Reduce secondary front yard setback to 15 feet for lots 65 feet in width or less; maintain 22
feet of building envelope width
8. Reduce lot coverage allowance to 30% for lots under 6,000 square feet
9. Impervious Surfaces – No Changes
Commissioners and staff had a discussion on each item listed. After each item held its conversation,
the Chair confirmed consensus on each one until the list concluded. Zimmerman reiterated that a
webpage with this information will soon be up for public review and comment.
Televised portion of the meeting concluded at 9:32 pm
City of Golden Valley Planning Commission Regular Meeting
April 27, 2020 – 7 pm
6
7. Council Liaison Report
Council Member Rosenquist updated the Commission on the bonding bill at the Legislature, which
include money for the DeCola Ponds E & F project as well as the Douglas Drive and Hwy 55 intersection
improvement. She shared the emergency allocations that were approved by the Human Services
Commission and indicated that many non‐profits received funds. Rosenquist reported that the Rhode
Island Ave subdivision was approved by the Council and that the Council also ratified a number of
Emergency Actions that the City had been taking in response to the COVID‐19 pandemic.
8. Reports on Meetings of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority, City Council, Board of Zoning
Appeals, and other meetings
Planning Manager Zimmerman stated that a May Board of Zoning Appeals meeting would be held. He
said he would investigate which Planning Commissioner was scheduled to attend the meeting.
9. Other Business
Planning Manager Zimmerman open nominations for Chair, Vice Chair, and Secretary for 2020.
Commissioner Johnson nominated Chair Blum for a second term. Commissioner Baker seconded and
the motion was approved unanimously. Commissioner Segelbaum nominated Commissioner Brookins
for Vice Chair. Commissioner Brookins declined the nomination. Segelbaum nominated Commission
Pockl for Vice Chair. Chair Blum seconded and the motion was approved unanimously. Brookins
nominated himself for a second term as Secretary. Baker seconded and the motion was approved
unanimously.
10. Adjournment
MOTION made by Commissioner Segelbaum, seconded by Commissioner Sadeghi and the motion
carried unanimously to adjourn the meeting at 9:55 PM.
________________________________
Adam Brookins, Secretary
________________________________
Amie Kolesar, Planning Assistant
1
Date: May 27, 2020
To: Golden Valley Planning Commission
From: Myles Campbell, Planner
Subject: Informal Public Hearing – Zoning Code Text Amendment –Amending Zoning
Districts to Regulate Tobacco Sales
Summary
As part of its 2019 work plan and recognizing the increasing role of the Cities’ regulations as a
promoter of public health, the Golden Valley City Council amended its licensing requirements for
tobacco retailers and asked the Planning Commission to further consider amendments to the
City’s zoning code regarding tobacco sales. The instigating concern was the rising level of tobacco
consumption amongst young adults and especially in regard to emerging tobacco products such
as e‐cigarettes. The Minnesota Department of Health, in a random survey of Minnesota public
school students between sixth and twelfth grade, found that 19.2% of participants had used an e‐
cigarette product in the past month.1
After initial discussion on the topic at its January 13th meeting, the Planning Commission made
some initial decisions on how they thought a zoning text amendment could best be handled.
Commissioners preferred to limit tobacco retailers to the City’s Commercial Zoning
District.
Commissioners had a preference to handle tobacco retailers as a restricted use rather
than a conditional use, making its enforcement an administrative rather than Council
action.
Commissioners agreed with proximity restrictions between tobacco retailers and uses
such as schools that had large youth populations, but did not see a need to make a similar
restriction between different tobacco retailers.
Commissioners wanted the ordinance to be cognizant of existing retailers and to limit the
economic impacts on those retailers as much as possible while still having meaningful
impact in reducing youth exposure and access to tobacco products.
1 Evered SR. Teens and Tobacco in Minnesota: Highlights from the 2017 Minnesota Youth Tobacco Survey: Minnesota
Center for Health Statistics, Minnesota Department of Health, February 2018.
2
A point of discussion that continued from that initial meeting into the Planning Commission’s
next deliberation on the topic at its February 10th meeting, was how to decide upon and define
those land uses that saw high levels of youth activity. Staff initially provided two broader options:
to use existing zoning categories as the basis for proximity restrictions, or to use a set of defined
land uses that could then be classified as “youth‐oriented facilities” in the City’s Zoning Code.
With both options, the basic idea of the restricted use would be the same – to create a minimum
distance that would need to exist between a proposed tobacco retailer and existing locations of
uses such as schools and parks. If that minimum distance could be established, the tobacco
retailer would be treated functionally as a permitted use in the Commercial District. If a location
fell short of that distance, it would be prohibited. A proximity restriction based on zoning, such as
from the City’s Institutional Zoning District, had the benefit of being relatively easy to enforce and
maintain over time, zoning districts being relatively static in nature. However, the major
drawback compared to a set of defined uses was the inability to make some key distinctions. A
school is definitely a youth‐oriented facility, but a church might not be even though both fall
under the Institutional zoning category.
After further discussion with Commissioners, staff feels this distinction makes the decision more
clear – that any proximity restriction placed on tobacco retailers should be based upon a defined
set of “Youth‐Oriented Facilities.” Done correctly, this will not only create a more effective
ordinance at limiting youth exposure, but also maintain additional commercial areas for use as
tobacco retailers where they present no harm to youth populations. This is also important given
the nature of restricted uses.
A restricted use is much like a conditional use in that it carries additional requirements to be
permitted in a particular zoning district. These requirements should be narrowly defined, and
have a clear nexus to the use itself and the stated goals of placing restrictions on that use. Similar
to why Commissioners can’t create extraneous conditions for a business coming in for a CUP
unless there is a connection to the business’ impact, a proximity restriction must be related to
the purpose of limiting youth tobacco exposure. This was another reason why staff moved away
from the use of broader zoning districts as the basis of restrictions. Defining those land uses with
the greatest threat of exposure means a more narrowly defined restricted use.
Proposed Ordinance
At its most recent meeting discussing the topic, which happened almost 3 months ago on
February 24th due to the escalation of the COVID19 pandemic, staff presented two sets of draft
ordinance language to commissioners. One still utilized existing zoning districts to establish
proximity restrictions from tobacco retailers. However, staff preferred the other option, which
defined “Youth‐Oriented Facilities” as follows:
Youth‐Oriented Facility: A school, athletic field, or playground.
3
For the reasons stated already, staff still feels that an approach using a defined set of facilities
makes more sense as the basis for any proximity restrictions on tobacco retailers. A clearer
connection to the ordinance’s purpose and the avoidance of unnecessary impacts on commercial
areas. In that ordinance, buffer distances were set at 750 feet and an additional allowance for
multi‐use properties was included, which allowed the measurement to occur between the
boundary of the youth‐oriented facility and only the portion of the structure/site occupied by the
retailer.
Commissioners still had two key concerns with the ordinance as presented, which staff have
worked to address as best as possible.
Commissioners had concern about the lack of a restriction around Theodore Wirth Park.
Commissioners were concerned about affecting existing business owners with proposed
changes, especially regarding the impact on resale potential.
Staff found a relatively simple solution to the first item. By amending the definition of youth
oriented facilities to include “parks” it would incorporate three additional park areas that were
not already captured by the definition:
Theodore Wirth Park
Paisley Park, a pocket park located in a residential neighborhood South of Olson Memorial
Highway
Sochacki Park, previously a nature area but now a park managed by Three Rivers
Adding these additional park areas did not impact the amount of available commercial area for
tobacco retailers, something only possible because they were defined separately from uses like
golf courses with which they share a broader zoning category. Staff is comfortable with their
inclusion in the ordinance.
In regards to business impacts and commissioners concerns, staff looked at the restriction
distances and the impacted commercial areas. Unfortunately, by nature of this action and the
previous licensing actions by the City Council, there is likely no way to avoid impacting both
existing businesses and potential future tobacco retailers. That said, staff examined the possibility
of reducing the distance restriction from 750 feet to 500. This reduction would still in most cases
mean at least a block’s worth of separation between uses. It would also allow additional
commercial areas to be viable tobacco retailer locations. This would be especially true in the area
of downtown where many more locations would be viable given the existing allowance for spaces
in multi‐use properties. By reducing the buffer distance to 500 feet from all schools, playgrounds,
athletic fields, and parks we would end up with the resulting areas of viable retailer locations.
Commercial Property Total Area (sq. ft.) Area/Total
Sales Allowed ‐ Full 4,783,119 78%
Sales Allowed ‐ Partial 996,285 16%
Sales Disallowed ‐Full 255,170 4%
Sales Disallowed ‐ Partial 121,861 2%
4
Total 6,156,435 100%
500 foot buffers around schools, parks, athletic fields, and playgrounds would result in less than
10% of commercial land in the City being unable to allow tobacco sales. Depending on
adjustments to the land use plan in the future, this proportion may change, but it should help to
alleviate concerns commissioners may have about impacting existing businesses. The vast
majority of commercial land will still be eligible to host a tobacco retailer once the amount of
retailers in the City dips back under the license limit imposed by the Council.
Additionally, Commissioners had wondered if it would be possible to base the restriction around
a maximum distance from highways in order to determine eligible locations for tobacco retailers.
Staff would recommend against this route for two principal reasons. One, the restrictions placed
on tobacco retailers should have a clear relation to the City’s purpose for taking action, namely
reducing youth exposure to tobacco products. A restriction based on distance from a highway
does not have a very clear connection to this purpose and would likely be easier to be challenged
by an incoming business. Secondly, given the pattern of land use, almost all commercial land is
already located closely to major roadways through or adjoining Golden Valley. Highways 55, 100,
169 and Interstate 394 all abut commercially zoned property, and a restriction based on
proximity to these roadways would likely not be much different than limiting the use to
commercial districts in the first place.
Given these changes to the ordinance language, staff feels confident that this iteration of the
tobacco ordinance is able to strike the balance that Commissioners have sought between limiting
youth exposure and impacts on local businesses. The ordinance language can be found attached
to this memo in an underlined and overstruck format showing changes from the existing code. To
briefly summarize the zoning actions being taken:
Tobacco Retailers would become a restricted use in the City’s Commercial Zoning District.
Youth‐Oriented Facilities would be added to the Zoning Code’s Definitions and would
include schools, parks, playgrounds, and athletic fields.
A 500‐foot proximity restriction between tobacco retailers and youth‐oriented facilities
would be required for new licensees.
In multi‐use properties, proximity would be measured from the portion of the property
occupied by the retailer.
Recommendations
Staff recommends amending Sections 113‐1 and 113‐92 of the City Code in order to restrict the
sale of tobacco in the city.
Attachments
Map of Suggested Proximity Restrictions (1 page)
Draft Ordinance Language, underlined and overstruck (1 page)
Underlined/Overstruck Language for Tobacco Sales Zoning Code Text Amendment
Proximity to Youth-Oriented Facilities
Sec. 113-1. - Definitions.
Youth-Oriented Facility: A school, park, athletic field, or playground.
…….
Sec. 113-92. - Commercial Zoning District.
(e) Restricted Uses. The following restricted uses shall be permitted within the
Commercial Zoning District:
(1) Tobacco retail establishments, as defined in City Code, section 16-158,
provided the following restrictions are observed:
a. The retail establishment shall be located not less than 500 feet from
all youth-oriented facilities, as measured at the lot line.
b. In the case of a multi-use building, distances from the retail
establishment shall be measured from the portion of the structure
occupied by the retailer.
!(k
!(k
!(k
!(k
!(k !(k
!(k
!(k !(k
!(k
!(k
!(k
!(k
!(k
!(k
Medic
i
neLakeBranchIkePond
Colonial Pond
Ottawa Pond
Glen-woodPond
EgretPond
LilacPond
DuluthPond
St.CroixPond
Chicago Pond
LilacPond
Pond CTurners PondGlen 1 Pond
DuckPond
Loop EPond
Loop FPond Sweeney LakeWirth LakeTwin LakeB a s s ett Creek
Hampshire Pond
DecolaPond A
NorthRicePond
West RingPond
Cortlawn Pond
DecolaPonds B & C
Westwood Lake
SchaperPond
SouthRicePond
East RingPond Bassett CreekDecolaPondE
DecolaPond F
BreckPond
NatchezPond
MinnaquaPond
WirthPond
Toledo/AngeloPond
HoneywellPond
StrawberryPond
DecolaPond D
Ba
s
s
e
tt Cr
e
e
k
BassettC
r
e
e
k
Basset
t
Cr
eekBassettC re ek
BassettC reekSweeney L akeBranchSweeney Lake BranchNW LoopPondBoone Avenue PondMain Stem
Pond B
Pond C
Bassett Creek NatureArea Pond
Medicine Lake
BrookviewPond A
Hidden LakesPond 1
Pond 2A
Pond 2B
Pond 3
Schaper BallfieldPond
Pond O
Pond J
Spirit of Hope Church Pond
GoldenRidgePond
Golden Meadows Pond
SoccerFieldPond
WestPond
201GeneralMillsPond
HaroldPond
Medicine Lake Road Pond
Xenia MitigationPond
10th AvePond
SpringPond
Briar-woodPond
LaurelHills Pond
JFB NWPond
LogisPond
BrownieLake
BirchPond
MinnaquaWetland
GrimesPondBassett CreekPark Pond
SweeneyLakeBranchPond M
Pond F
Pond DPond E
Dover HillPondLiberty BasinBrookviewGolf Course
LionsPark
WesleyPark
Sochacki Park
SchaperPark
ScheidParkHampshirePark
MedleyPark
Briarwood
Laurel Avenue Greenbelt
Glenview TerracePark
North TyrolPark
Western AvenueMarsh
Nature
Area
GeartyPark
Sandburg AthleticFacility
NatchezPark
ValleyView ParkPennsylvaniaWoods
BassettCreekNature Area
WildwoodPark
IsaacsonPark
SouthTyrol Park
SeemanPark
AdelineNature Area
YosemitePark
StockmanPark
Golden OaksPark
St CroixPark
LakeviewPark
SweeneyPark
Perpich CenterBall Fields
Ronald B. Davis Community Center
Brookview Park
Westwood HillsNature Center (SLP)
(MPRB)
Theodore WirthRegional Park
Eloise Butler WildflowerGarden and Bird Sanctuary
Wirth LakeBeach
Golden RidgeNature Area
General Mills NaturePreserve
General Mills ResearchNature Area
BooneOpenSpace
GoldenHills Pond
MadisonPond
SouthTyrolPond
LibraryHill
IdahoWetland
GeorgiaOpen Space
ArdmoreNorth&SouthPonds
JanalynPond
MeadowPond
O pen S pace
OrklaOpenSpace
PicnicPavilion
Chalet
SochackiPark (Three Rivers Park Dist.)
Bassett Valley Open Space
ByrdBluffOpenSpace
→
FishingDock
PaisleyPark
XeniaOpenSpace
DahlbergOpenSpace
Minnaqua Greenbelt
(TRPD)
(Mpls Park & Rec Board)
Plymouth Avenue The Trailhead
456766
456770
456766
456740
456740
4567156
4567102
§¨¦394
§¨¦394
Æÿ55
Æÿ55
Æÿ100
Æÿ100
£¤169
£¤169
34th Ave N
Medicine Lake Rd
BroggerCir Knoll St Lilac Dr NLilac Dr NThotland Rd
Mendelssohn Ave NWinnetka Ave NSunnyridgeCir
Western Ave (Wat
erfordDr)Hillsboro Ave NZealandAve
N
Aquila Ave NOrkla DrWisconsin Ave N23rd Ave N
KalternLn
Wynnwood Rd
25th Ave N
Bies DrJonellen Ln
Sumter Ave NRhodeIslandAveNPatsy Ln Valders Ave NWinnetka Ave NDuluth St Florida Ave NSandburg Rd HeritageCirKentley Ave
Wynnwood Rd
Kenneth Way
Unity Ave NB a s s e tt C r e e k DrQuailAveNScott Ave NLilac Dr NLowry Ter
33rd Ave N
Noble Ave NCross LnQuail Ave NScott Ave NRegent Ave NToledo Ave NIndiana Ave N(BridgewaterRd)(WaterfordCt)(Hid
d
e
n
LnkesPkwy)Meadow Ln NFrance Ave NTopel Rd
Unity Ave NPhoenix St
Parkview TerWelcomeAveNWelcomeC ir
Welcom
eAveNXeniaAveNZ
a
n
e Av
e
N
Lindsay St
St Croix Ave N
St Croix Ave N
Yosemite Ave NWolfberryLnBrunswick Ave NCounty Rd 102Westmore Way
Green Valley Rd
Louisiana Ave NKelly DrMaryland Ave NOlympia St
Winsdale St
Winnetka Ave NYukon CtWesleyDr WesleyDr
Plymouth Ave N
10th Ave N
Kelly DrVarner CirPennsylvania Ave NFaribault StQuebec Ave NRhode Island Ave NPhoenix St
Knoll St
County Rd 156Jersey Ave NCountryClubDr
P h o e n ix S t
Douglas DrGeorgia Ave NCou
nty
Rd40
Hampshire Ave NWestch e sterCirJersey Ave NGardenParkQue
be
c
Av
e
SWinnetka Ave NWally St
Ensign Ave N7th Ave N
Golden Valley Rd Decatur Ave N10th Ave N
Natchez Ave NXerxes Ave N (Mpls)Olson Memorial Hwy
Cutacross Rd
Olson Memorial Hwy
Earl St
Flag Ave NHampshire
LnJersey Ave NFloridaAveNEdgewoodAve NDouglas DrDuluth Ln
Scott Ave N
Drake Rd
Lowry Ter Kyle Ave NQuail Ave NPerry Ave NNoble Ave NCulver Rd
Dawnview Ter
Dona Ln
Noble Ave NScottAveNGlendenTer
Culver Rd
Marie Ln W
Hampton Rd
RegentAveNPerryAveNLilac Dr N27th Ave N
Merribee Dr Kyle Ave NHampton RdOrchard Ave NMarie Ln E
Lee Ave NKyle Ave NDres
de
n
L
n
Kewanee Way
26th Ave N
Meridia
n D
r
P
ark
vie
w
Blv
d Terrace LnManor DrMcNair DrByrd Ave N
Bas
s
ettCreekDrMaryHillsDrZenith Ave NVista DrXerxes Ave NYork Ave NS t M a rg are t D rZephyr PlXerxes Ave NXerxes Ave N (Mpls)(SkylineDr)Spruce TrKyle PlWestbrook Rd Noble Ave Frontage RdCircleDownOrchard Ave NPerryAveNWindsorWayWestbendRdUnity Ave NG reenvie wLn
Regent Ave NSorell Ave
FrontenacAveQuail Ave NStCroixAveN
Winsdale St StCroixCirAngelo DrUnity Ave NAlfred Rd Spring Valley RdN
o
ble
DrMajor DrAdeline LnAngelo DrAngelo DrWills PlToledo Ave NOttawa Ave NKillarney DrZane Ave NWoodstock Ave Woodstock Ave
Loring LnYosemiteAveN
Turners Crossroad NWestchesterCirN
F
r
ontageRdFlorida Ave NHampshire Ave NPlymouth Ave N
Idaho Ave NOlympia StHampshire Ave NArcher Ave NKelly DrPennsylvania Ave NDuluth St Xylon Ave NWisconsin Ave NSumter Ave NBoone Ave NWinsdale St
Meadow Ln N
DahlbergD r
Woodstock Ave
Poplar Dr Meadow Ln NChatelain Ter
Natchez Ave NEdgewood Ave NK in g s t on C i r
Glenwood Ave
Country Club DrValdersAveNOrkla DrElgin PlDecaturAveN
Indiana Ave NRoanoke CirWestern Ave Western Ave
Harold Ave
Loring Ln
WestwoodDrNArdmoreDrWinsdale St
Knoll St
Oak Grove CirDuluth St Zane Ave NDouglas Dr27th Ave N
Bo
n
nieLn
Medicine Lake Rd
Madison Ave W
Nevada Ave NLouisiana Ave NCounty Rd 70
ValdersAve NValders Ave N23rd Ave N Rhode IslandAve NCounty Rd 156Medicine Lake Rd
Mendelssohn Ave NWinsdale St
St Croix Ave N June Ave NLegend DrLegendLn
General Mills BlvdBoone Ave NSunnyridge LnGlenwood Ave
Janalyn CirJanalyn CirGlencrest Rd Meadow Ln SWayzata BlvdWestwood Dr SWestwoodLn
StrawberryLnOttawa Ave NOttawa Ave SNatchez Ave S Tyrol Crest
SussexRdJune Ave SWayzata Blvd
FairlawnWayNatchez Ave SOttawa Ave SPrincetonAve SDouglas Ave
Circle DownTurners Crossroad SGolden Hills Dr
Laurel AveLaurel Ave
Hampshire Ave SDakota Ave SBrunswick Ave SKing Hill RdGlenwood Ave
Colonial Dr
Medicine Lake Rd
FloridaAveSAlley
Market StMarket St
Louisiana Ave SLaurel AvePennsylvania Ave SRhode Island Ave SSumter Ave SUtah Ave SGregory Rd
VermontAve SWi
sc
o
nsin
AveSGeneral Mills BlvdHanley RdRidgeway Rd
Laurel Ave QubecAve S County Rd 102Nevada Ave SColonial RdLouisianaAveSKentucky Ave SJersey Ave SHeathbrookeCir
G le n w o o d P k w y
(Carriage Path)Xenia Ave SFlorida CtLilacDr
NOlson Memorial Hwy
Schaper Rd
Lilac Dr NG old en V a lle y R d
Lilac Dr N(WoodlandTrail)(Wat.Dr)
BassettCreek Ln
(NobleDr)France Ave S (Mpls)N Frontage Rd
S Frontage Rd Olson Mem HwyAdair Ave NAdair Ave NWestbrookRd
34th Ave N
Mendelssohn Ave NAlley-Unimproved--Unimproved-
Wayzata Blvd
Wayzata BlvdBoone Ave NG o ld e nValley D r
SchullerCirN Front ag e Rd S F r o nt a g e Rd
Rhode IslandAve N Pennsylvania Ave SAlley
Alley
(Private)AlleyAlleyLilac Dr NXerxes Ave N (Mpls)Harold Ave WestwoodDr
N
Ardmore DrT
he
o
d
ore
Wirth
P
k
w
y
Tyrol Tr(Mendelssohn Ln)AlleyS Frontage Rd
Al
pinePassBrenner
P
a
ssDougl a s Ave
QuentinAveSTyrol TrailTyrol
Tra ilSunsetRidge
Westw
oodDrS
RavineTrTyrol
Tr
ail
Janalyn C i rMaddusLn
MeadowLnS
AvondaleRdBurntsideDr Su nnyridgeLnBru
n
s
wickAveNLeberLn
C lo v e rle afDrCloverLnC
loverleafD
r TheodoreWirthPkwyBeverly Ave
B u rn tsideDrSpringValleyRdToledoAveN
DuluthSt
GoldenV alle y R dSpringValleyCirCounty Rd 66
(IslandDr)(IslandDr)GoldenValleyRd
TheodoreWirthPkwyW irth P k w y
Wayzat
a
Blvd
G le n w o o d P kwyPlymouthAve N (Mpls)ZenithAveNCr
est
vi
ewAve
Byr d A v e N
Hwy 55
Glenwood Ave
Bassett CreekDrLegend DrLeeAveNLeeAveNMajorAveNLeeAveNEl m daleRd
AdellAv eM in n a quaDr M innaq uaD r
ToledoAveNOrdwayMarkayRidge Orchard Ave NNor m a n d y Pl
CherokeePlQuailAveNRegentAveNTri t o n DrTr ito n D r
L o w r y Ter
3
3rdAveN
SandburgLn Lamplighter
Ln
BrookridgeAveNValeCrestRdWinfieldAveCountyRd 66
ParkPlaceBlvd
(SLP)I-394SF r ontage Rd (SLP)Xeni
aAveSCounty Rd 70
L ila cD rNLilacDrNLilacD
r
NConstanceDrWConstanceDrESandburg Rd
S Frontage Rd
N Frontage Rd N Frontage RdOlsonMemorialHwy
S F r o n t a g e R d
Ol s o n M e m o r i a l Hw y
OlsonMemorialHwy Valleywo
odCirYosemite CirLawn TerR
adissonRd
Turnpike
RdAlley
AlleyTurnpikeRd Col
onialDr
GlenwoodAve
BrunswickAve NMeanderRd
MeanderRdIdahoAveNHaroldAve
Wayzata Blvd
I-394SFrontageRd
Edgewo
o
dAveSIdahoAveNCortlawnCirWCortlawn Cir S
CortlawnCirN
Dawnvie w TerCounty Rd 70
EdgewoodAveSK in g CreekRdKentu
ckyAveNLouisianaAveNMarylandAve SRhodeIslandAveSRidgewayRdEwaldTe rWesternTer
FieldD r Brookview Pk w y N Harold Ave
HalfMoonDr
RidgewayRdG oldenValleyR d(B assett Creek
Blvd)Lewis Rd
10thAve N
EllisLnP lym outhAv eN Plymouth Ave N
FaribaultSt
OrklaDrCastleCt Winnetka Heights D rKelly
Dr
Maryland
Av
eNHampshire Pl
OlympiaSt
Oregon Ave NQuebecAveNValdersAveNOrklaDrKnoll StWisconsinA
veNWinsdaleSt
Mandan
AveNCounty Rd 102AquilaAveNAquila
A
veNZealandAveNJulianneTer Jul ia n neTerPatsy Ln
WisconsinAveNAquilaAveNWestbendRd
WinnetkaHeightsDr
ZealandAveNOrklaDrValdersCtValdersAve NWinnetkaHeights Dr
Aq uilaAveNZealandAveNS c ottAveNRose
ManorDuluthSt
Duluth St CavellAveNEnsignAveNElg in Pl
23rd Ave N
Medley L n
(Medley Rd)
(Medley C ir)H illsboroAveN(English Cir)(MayfairR
d
)(Kin
g
s
V a lleyRd)(K ings
V
al
leyRdE)(KingsValleyRdW)
(Stro
d
en
Cir)(Tamarin Tr)
(Mar
qui
sRd)
Ski Hill
Rd MajorCirLeeAveNMajorAveNRhodeIslandAveNG o ld e n V a lle yR d
G o ld e n V a lle y R d
G o ld e n V a lle y R d
Hwy100Hwy100Hwy100Hwy100Hwy100Hwy100
Hwy 394
Hwy394 Hwy394
Hwy 394 Hwy394ColoradoAve NHwy169Hwy169Hwy169Hwy169Hwy169Colorado Ave SGoldenHil l s DrPaisleyLnPaisleyLn
I-394NFrontageRd I-394 N FrontageRd
WayzataBlvd
I-394SFrontag e Rd
York
AveNValeryRdW
asatchLn
Hwy 55
Hwy 55
H w y 5 5
Olson Memorial HwyHwy 55
H wy 5 5
County Rd 40
County Rd 40 Glenwoo d A ve
County R d 4 0
CountyRd40
GoldenValleyRd
C o unty Rd66ManchesterDr
County Rd 156OregonAveS24thAve N
LilacDrNRoanokeRdLouisianaAveN
TurnpikeRdLilacLoop (Sunnyridge Ln)WisconsinAveN
GettysburgCt(LaurelPt)
(Laurel Curv)Independence Ave NGettysburg Ave NFlag Ave NWheelerBlvdAlleyNaper St
Be tty CrockerDr Decatur Ave N(WesleyCommonsDr)Winnetka Ave S Winnetka Ave SHanley RdBrookviewPkwySWayzataBlvd
I-394 S Frontage R d
Olympia St
Independence Ave NHillsboro Ave NGettysburg Ave NCity of Golden Valley7800 Golden Valley RoadGolden Valley, MN 55427-4588763-593-8030www.goldenvalleymn.gov
Tobacco Sales
0 800 1,600 2,400 3,200400
Feet
IPrint Date: 5/20/2020
Sources:
-Hennepin County Surveyors Office for Property Lines (2019)
-City of Golden Valley for all other layers.
!(k Existing Tobacco License
Sale Restriction
Athletic Field, Playground, School, or
Park - 500 ft buffer
Public Athletic Space
Public Playground
No Sale Property Buffer
Commercial (63)
Sales Allowed - Full Property (53)
Sales Allowed - Partial Property (7)
Sales Disallowed - Partial Property (7)
Sales Disallowed - Full Property (3)