The URL can be used to link to this page

12-07-21 City Council Agenda REGULAR MEETING AGENDA City Council meetings are being conducted in a hybrid format with in-person and remote options for attending, participating, and commenting. The public can make statements in this meeting during public comment sections, including the public forum beginning at 6:20 pm. Remote Attendance/Comment Options: Members of the public may attend this meeting by watching on cable channel 16, streaming on CCXmedia.org, streaming via Webex, or by calling 1- 415-655-0001 and entering access code 177 760 7633. Members of the public wishing to address the Council should call 763-593-8060. 1. Call to Order A. Pledge of Allegiance Pages B. Roll Call C. Receive and Approve the Human Services Commission Annual Allocation Report 3 D. Police Department Employee Award Recognition 4-5 2. Additions and Corrections to Agenda 3. Consent Agenda Approval of Consent Agenda - All items listed under this heading are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no discussion of these items unless a Council Member so requests in which event the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda. A. Approval of Minutes 1. Special City Council Closed Executive Session – November 30, 2021 6 B. Approval of City Check Register 7 C. Bids, Quotes, and Contracts: 1. Approve Agreement with Hennepin County for the 2022-2023 Sentencing to Service Program 8-16 2. Purchase Approvals - Vactor Combo Sewer Truck - Rescind Original Purchase Approval Made on August 17, 2021 - Approve Purchase of a 2022 Vactor 2100I Combo Sewer Truck from MacQueen Equipment in the amount of $289,954.60 - Approve Purchase of a 2022 Mack Granite 64FR Tandem Axle from Nuss Truck & Equipment in the Amount of $132,387.47 17-42 3. Authorize Mayor and City Manager to Sign Funding Agreement for the Toward Zero Death Grant Program With the City of Orono, Resolution No. 21-99 43-66 D. Approve Resolution No. 21-91 Designating Polling Places for the 2022 Election Cycle 67-68 December 7, 2021 – 6:30 pm Council Chambers Hybrid Meeting City of Golden Valley City Council Regular Meeting December 7, 2021 – 6:30 pm 2 E. Approve Summary of Conclusion Regarding City Manager Performance Evaluation from Closed Executive Session on November 30, 2021 69 F. Approve Resolution No. 21-92 Authorizing a Joint Powers Agreement for the West Metro Home Remodeling Fair 70-81 G. Approve Resolution No. 21-93 Granting City Council Consent and Authorization for the Housing and Redevelopment Adopted Tax Levy Payable in 2022 82-83 H. Approve Resolution No. 21-94 Adopting the 2022-2031 Capital Improvement Program 84-93 I. Approve Resolution No. 21-95 Adopting the 2022-2023 Budget for Enterprise, Special Revenue and Internal Services Funds 94-106 4. Public Hearing A. Public Comment and Adoption of the 2022-2023 General Fund Budget and Property Tax Levies for Taxes Payable 2022, Resolutions No. 21-96 and 21-97 107-118 B. Public Hearing – Final Plan for Greenway Villas PUD No. 126 – 7001 Golden Valley Road, Ordinance No. 725 119-198 C. Continuation of Public Hearing – 6300 Olson Memorial Highway, United Properties 1. Amendment to Future Land use Map, Resolution No. 21-98 2. Amendment to Zoning Map, Ordinance No. 724 3. Preliminary Plan for Subdivision 199-240 242-254 255-275 5. Old Business 6. New Business All Ordinances listed under this heading are eligible for public input. A. First Consideration of Ordinance No. 726, Modifying the Composition of the Environmental Commission 276-283 B. First Consideration of Ordinance No. 727, Amending the City Code to Establish a Public Land Disposition Procedure 284-292 C. Review of Council Calendar 293 D. Mayor and Council Communications 1. Other Committee/Meeting updates 7. Adjournment Golden Valley City Council Meeting December 7, 2021 Agenda Item 1. C. Receive and Approve the Human Services Commission Annual Allocation Report Prepared By Brian Erickson, Recreation Supervisor Summary The Human Services Commission (HSC) met on October 11, 2021 to review funding requests from agencies. The following requests were received and approved by the HSC for allocation at the November 8, 2021, meeting: Financial or Budget Considerations Agency Request Recommended allocation Crisis Nursery $ 8,000 $ 5,000 CEAP $10,000 $ 8,000 PRISM $25,000 $15,000 Senior Services HOME $ 7,000 $ 6,500 Senior Services Outreach $ 5,000 $ 5,000 Sojourner Project $ 7,500 $ 7,500 TreeHouse $ 5,000 $ 0 YMCA - New Hope $ 2,500 $ 2,500 HUG $ 5,000 $ 5,000 Valley of Peace $ 2,000 $ 2,000 Resource West $ 5,000 $ 3,500 TOTAL $82,000 $60,000 Agencies will be directed to use the funds for program costs for Golden Valley residents, when possible. Denise La Mere Anderson, Chair, will be at the meeting to review the Allocation Report and recap the 2021 activities. Recommended Action Motion to receive and file the 2022 Allocation Report and approve notifying the eleven agencies of their 2022 allocation amount. Golden Valley City Council Meeting December 7, 2021 Agenda Item 1. D. Police Department Employee Award Recognition Prepared By Scott Nadeau, Chief David Kuhnly, Commander Summary The Golden Valley Police Department recognizes its employees for excellence in service and performance. Awards distributed will be in the categories of Life Saving, Departmental Commendation, Unit Citation, Certificate of Excellence, Letter of Recognition and Certificate of Merit. Financial Or Budget Considerations Not applicable Supporting Documents • Police Employee Awards Recognition Ceremony Program (1 page) SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL CLOSED EXECUTIVE SESSION MINUTES 1. Call to Order Mayor Harris called the meeting to order at 6:30 pm. Present: Mayor Shep Harris, Council Members Larry Fonnest, Maurice Harris, Gillian Rosenquist, and Kimberly Sanberg Staff present: City Manager Cruikshank 2. Conduct Performance Evaluation of City Manager Tim Cruikshank The Council and City Manager Cruikshank met in closed session to conduct a performance evaluation. This meeting was closed as permitted by Minn. Stat. § 13D.05, subd. 3(a). A summary of the outcome of this meeting will be provided in the December 7, 2021 City Council meeting agenda materials. 3. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned by unanimous consent at 9:16 pm. ________________________________ Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: _________________________________ Theresa J. Schyma, City Clerk November 30, 2021 – 6:30 pm Manager’s Conference Room Golden Valley City Hall 7800 Golden Valley Road Golden Valley City Council Meeting December 7, 2021 Agenda Item 3. B. Approval of City Check Register Prepared By Sue Virnig, Finance Director Summary Approval of the check register for various vendor claims against the City of Golden Valley. Financial Or Budget Considerations The check register has a general ledger code as to where the claim is charged. At the end of the register is a total amount paid by fund. Recommended Action Motion to authorize the payment of the bills as submitted. Supporting Documents Document is located on city website at the following location: http://weblink.ci.golden-valley.mn.us/WebLink/Browse.aspx?id=876916&dbid=0&repo=GoldenValley The check register for approval: • 11-23-21 Check Register Golden Valley City Council Meeting December 7, 2021 Agenda Item 3. C. 1. Approve Agreement with Hennepin County for the 2022/2023 Sentencing to Service Program Prepared By Tim Kieffer, Public Works Director Al Lundstrom, Park Maintenance Superintendent Summary The Public Works Department receives requests for miscellaneous tasks including weeding, litter pickup, trimming, and park cleanup that exceed the department's available resources. In response to meet these needs, the City has contracted with Hennepin County's Sentencing to Service Program (STS) since 2014. The STS crews perform a range of tasks listed below: • Weeding and mulching public landscapes • Mulching and leveling playgrounds • Nature trail maintenance • Trimming small trees and shrubs • Edging and line trimming parks • Sod and seed restoration projects • Painting picnic tables, hockey rink boards, buildings, and signs • Fall cleanup and cutting perennials • Highway 55 Lilac Project maintenance • Cleaning and landscape maintenance around Stormwater ponds • Litter picking all public grounds and highways • Buckthorn removal projects • Snow removal around pedestrian facilities Staff proposes to continue the working relationship with STS in 2022 and 2023. Under the new two-year contract, Hennepin County will continue to provide one STS crew full time (5 days a week) to Golden Valley. The primary focus of the STS crews will continue to be the tasks listed above and other environment-related efforts. City Council Regular Meeting Executive Summary City of Golden Valley December 7, 2021 2 Financial Or Budget Considerations The total expense for STS in 2020 and 2021 was $196,991.60. The two-year cost to continue this service in 2022 and 2023 shall not exceed $202,742.80, which includes a 3% increase in 2022 and no increase in 2023. The cost is shared between the Conservation/Recycling Fund and Storm Sewer Fund. Each fund has $62,595 and $53,340 budgeted, respectfully, in 2022 and 2023. Recommended Action Motion to authorize the Mayor and City Manager to execute the Sentencing to Service Program Services Agreement with Hennepin County in the form approved by the City Attorney to authorize the 2022 through 2023 Sentencing to Service Program in an amount not to exceed $202,742.80. Supporting Documents • Sentencing to Service Program Services Agreement with the City of Golden Valley (7 pages) Contract No. A2110952 STS Form Agreement Rev 07/2021 Page 1 of 7 SENTENCING TO SERVICE PROGRAM SERVICES AGREEMENT This Agreement is between the COUNTY OF HENNEPIN, STATE OF MINNESOTA, A-2300 Government Center, 300 South Sixth Street, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55487, on behalf of the Hennepin County Department of Community Corrections and Rehabilitation, C-2300 Government Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55487 (“COUNTY” or “DEPARTMENT”) and the CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, MN 55427 (“PARTNER”). WHEREAS, COUNTY operates the Sentencing to Service Program (“PROGRAM”), which offers offenders an opportunity to learn landscape maintenance and other marketable skills; and WHEREAS, PARTNER wishes to purchase the services of PROGRAM; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual undertakings and agreements hereinafter set forth, COUNTY and PARTNER agree as follows: 1. TERM AND COST OF THIS AGREEMENT This Agreement shall be in effect from January 1, 2022, through December 31, 2023, unless terminated earlier in accordance with the Default and Cancellation provisions of this Agreement. The total cost of this Agreement shall not exceed Two Hundred Two Seven Hundred Forty- Two Thousand Dollars and Eighty Cents ($202,742.80) plus applicable tax. 2. SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED COUNTY agrees to provide labor to perform the following work, in accordance with the terms of this Agreement: forestry, park, janitorial, street and utility maintenance services (“Work”) as more specifically described in Attachment A. 3. PARTNER RESPONSIBILITIES PARTNER agrees to the following: A. Obtain all necessary permits or licenses or special authority for all Work. B. Assign all Work and coordinate material purchases and delivery for projects to be performed. 4. COUNTY RESPONSIBILITIES COUNTY agrees to the following with respect to Work requested: Contract No. A2110952 STS Form Agreement Rev 07/2021 Page 2 of 7 A. Provide work crew(s) in the number and on the days specified in Attachment A. B. Provide COUNTY-employed work crew leader who will be responsible for the transportation, instruction, and supervision of PROGRAM work crew. C. Provide required personal safety equipment and clothing needed for specific Work. D. Provide basic landscaping or other tools and equipment needed for specific Work. E. Train each PROGRAM work crew in necessary safety principles and techniques. F. Provide quarterly reports to PARTNER that show the number of days worked and total hours of service received. G. Assume all medical liability for PROGRAM participants. H. COUNTY, in its sole discretion, will assign PROGRAM participants of any gender, race or age capable of performing the necessary Work assignments. 5. COST AND PAYMENT FOR SERVICES A. COUNTY shall bill PARTNER for services performed including all applicable state and local sales tax as further specified in Attachment A. If PARTNER is exempt from any such tax, it shall provide a completed Certificate of Exemption to the COUNTY as specified in Attachment A. B. Payment for services performed by COUNTY shall be paid by PARTNER within thirty (30) days from the date of invoice. 6. INDEPENDENT PARTIES Nothing is intended or should be construed as creating or establishing the relationship of co- partners between the parties or as constituting either party as the agent, representative, or employee of the other party for any purpose. Each party is and shall remain an independent party for all services performed under this Agreement. Each party shall secure at its own expense all personnel required in performing services under this Agreement. Any personnel or other persons engaged in the performance of any work or services required by a party will have no contractual relationship with the other party and will not be considered employees of the other party. 7. INDEMNIFICATION Except as further provided in this paragraph: (1) each party is responsible for its own errors, acts, and omissions and the results thereof to the extent authorized by law and shall not be responsible for the errors, acts, and omissions of the other party and the results thereof, and (2) each party agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the other party, its officials, officers, agents, and employees, for its own errors, acts, and omissions and the results thereof Contract No. A2110952 STS Form Agreement Rev 07/2021 Page 3 of 7 to the extent authorized by law. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Section 7, COUNTY shall have no liability to the PARTNER for any cause under or related to this Agreement for any consequential, special, incidental, punitive, or indirect damages (including without limitation loss of profit, revenue, business opportunity, or business advantage), whether based upon a claim or action of tort, contract, warranty, negligence, strict liability, contribution, or any other legal theory or cause of action. COUNTY’s and PARTNER’s liability shall be governed by and limited in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 466. 8. DATA PRACTICES Both parties shall abide by the provisions of the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13 (MGDPA), and all other applicable state and federal laws, rules, regulations, and orders relating to data privacy and confidentiality. 9. SUBCONTRACTING AND ASSIGNMENTS Neither party shall assign, subcontract, transfer, or pledge this Agreement, in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of the other party. 10. MERGER AND MODIFICATION A. It is understood and agreed that the entire Agreement between the parties is contained herein and that this Agreement supersedes all oral agreements and negotiations between the parties relating to the subject matter. All items that are referenced or that are attached are incorporated and made a part of this Agreement. B. Any alterations, variations, modifications, or waivers of provisions of this Agreement shall only be valid when they have been reduced to writing as an amendment to this Agreement signed by the parties. 11. DEFAULT AND CANCELLATION A. If either party fails to perform any of the provisions of this Agreement or so fails to administer the work as to endanger the performance of this Agreement, it shall be in default. Unless the default is excused by the nondefaulting party, the nondefaulting party may upon written notice immediately cancel this Agreement in its entirety. Additionally, failure of PARTNER to comply with the terms of this Agreement shall be just cause for COUNTY to immediately cease providing services under this Agreement until PARTNER resumes compliance. B. The above remedies shall be in addition to any other right or remedy available to the parties under this Agreement, law, statute, rule, and/or equity. C. Either party’s failure to insist upon strict performance of any provision or to exercise any right under this Agreement shall not be deemed a relinquishment or waiver of the same, Contract No. A2110952 STS Form Agreement Rev 07/2021 Page 4 of 7 unless consented to in writing. Such consent shall not constitute a general waiver or relinquishment throughout the entire term of this Agreement. D. This Agreement may be cancelled with or without cause by either party upon thirty (30) days written notice. 12. CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION In order to coordinate the services of PARTNER with the activities of the DEPARTMENT, so as to accomplish the purposes of this Agreement, Logan Futterer, Corrections Program Manager, Hennepin County Department of Community Corrections & Rehabilitation, Community Offender Management Division, 3000 North Second Street, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55411, logan.futterer@hennepin.us or his successor (Contract Administrator), shall manage this Agreement on behalf of COUNTY and serve as liaison between COUNTY and PARTNER. 13. NOTICES Any notice or demand which must be given or made by a party under this Agreement or any statute or ordinance shall be in writing and shall be sent registered or certified mail. Notices to COUNTY shall be sent to the County Administrator with a copy to the originating DEPARTMENT at the address given in the opening paragraph of this Agreement. Notice to PARTNER shall be sent to the address stated in the opening paragraph of this Agreement. 14. MINNESOTA LAWS GOVERN The laws of the state of Minnesota shall govern all questions and interpretations concerning the validity and construction of this Agreement and the legal relations between the parties and their performance. The appropriate venue and jurisdiction for any litigation will be those courts located within the county of Hennepin, state of Minnesota. Litigation, however, in the federal courts involving the parties will be in the appropriate federal court within the state of Minnesota. If any provision of this Agreement is held invalid, illegal, or unenforceable, the remaining provisions will not be affected. THIS PORTION OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Contract No. A2110952 STS Form Agreement Rev 07/2021 Page 5 of 7 COUNTY BOARD AUTHORIZATION Reviewed for COUNTY by the County Attorney's Office for DOCCR: {{Sig_es_:signer3:signature}} {{userstamp3_es_:signer3:stamp}} Reviewed for COUNTY by: {{Sig_es_:signer4:signature}} {{userstamp4_es_:signer4:stamp}} Board Resolution No: {{*BoardResolution_es_:signer4:brs}} Document Assembled by: {{Sig_es_:signer1:signature}} {{userstamp1_es_:signer1:stamp}} {{Exh_es_:signer1:attachment:label("Attachments")}} COUNTY OF HENNEPIN STATE OF MINNESOTA By: {{Sig_es_:signer6:signature}} {{userstamp6_es_:signer6:stamp}} ATTEST: {{Sig_es_:signer7:signature}} {{userstamp7_es_:signer7:stamp}} By: {{Sig_es_:signer5:signature}} {{userstamp5_es_:signer5:stamp}} Contract No. A2110952 STS Form Agreement Rev 07/2021 Page 6 of 7 PARTNER PARTNER warrants that the person who executed this Agreement is authorized to do so on behalf of PARTNER as required by applicable articles, bylaws, resolutions or ordinances.* By: {{Sig_es_:signer2:signature}} {{userstamp2_es_:signer2:stamp}} {{ ttl_es_:signer2:title}} *PARTNER represents and warrants that it has submitted to COUNTY all applicable documentation (articles, bylaws, resolutions or ordinances) that confirms the signatory's delegation of authority. Documentation is not required for a sole proprietorship. Contract No. A2110952 STS Form Agreement Rev 07/2021 Page 7 of 7 ATTACHMENT A Hennepin County STS Services For City of Golden Valley January 1, 2022 – December 31, 2023 SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED: Forestry, park, street and utility maintenance, as well as janitorial services. SERVICE FREQUENCY: One (1) STS work crew, five (5) days per week for a minimum of six (6) hours per day, excluding paid breaks. COST PER DAY: Three Hundred Eighty-Nine Dollars and Eighty-Nine Cents ($389.89) TOTAL COST: $202,742.80 (389.89/day x 5 days/week x 52 weeks x 2 years) INVOICING: (Quarterly) PARTNER CONTACT INFORMATION: Tim Kieffer Public Works Director City of Golden Valley 7800 Golden Valley Road Golden Valley, MN 55427 763-593-3960 (Direct) tkieffer@goldenvalleymn.gov TAXABLE STATUS Hennepin County provides certain services that are taxable in the state of Minnesota. Appropriate sales tax will be charged for all taxable services provided. If your organization is exempt from any state or local sales tax, you must provide a completed Certificate of Exemption (Form ST3) to the COUNTY liaison identified in section 12. Please consult the Minnesota Department of Revenue Sales & Use Tax guides (available at https://www.revenue.state.mn.us/sales-and-use-tax) for information on taxability of specific services. Golden Valley City Council Meeting December 7, 2021 Agenda Item 3. C. 2. Approve Purchase of a Vactor Combo Sewer Truck Prepared By Tim Kieffer, Public Works Director Marshall Beugen, Street and Vehicle Maintenance Superintendent Joe Hansen, Utility Maintenance Superintendent Summary Unit 699, a 2012 Vactor 2100 was approved to be replaced by the City Council on August 17, 2021. Afterwards, the truck chassis manufacturer said they could not provide a chassis until 2023 at the earliest due to supply chain issues and then stopped responding to our phone calls. The Vactor is an emergency vehicle used to clean and remove debris from sanitary and storm sewers, and during excavations and water main breaks. Lead-time for a new truck is at least 13 month. Therefore, staff began designing a new Vactor on a different truck chassis given the urgency to replace the current Vactor due to needed repairs costing over $62,000. The Vactor meets replacement criteria set forth in the City’s vehicle replacement policy and Vehicle Condition Index (VCI). The VCI index is a tool utilized to assess all vehicles and equipment scheduled for replacement and any vehicle/equipment scoring 28 points and above meets the category of “needs immediate consideration.” The existing truck due for replacement scored 31 points. Financial Or Budget Considerations Staff recommends purchasing the equipment from the state contract through the State of Minnesota’s cooperative purchasing venture (CPV). The Minnesota Materials Management Division has awarded contract numbers 191591 and 194871 through the CPV. The 2021 Water and Sewer Capital Improvement Program (CIP) includes $550,000 for the purchase of a Combination Jet/Vactor truck (W&SS-100) in 2024. Project W&SS-107 have been postponed to keep within budget. City Council Regular Meeting Executive Summary City of Golden Valley December 7, 2021 2 Under Minnesota Statutes Section 471.345, the City may dispose of retired equipment by trading it in. MacQueen Equipment has offered $96,400 for trade-in of Unit 699. Staff believes this is a fair offer due to the needed repairs. The cost for the Vactor is $386,354.60. The total remittance to vendor with the $96,400 trade-in is $289,954.60. The cost for the Mack truck chassis is $132,387.47 for a grand total of $422, 342.07. Recommended Action • Motion to rescind purchase approval of a 2022 Vactor 2100I Combo Sewer Truck from MacQueen Equipment in the amount of $397,442.60 made on August 17, 2021. • Motion to approve purchase of a 2022 Vactor 2100I Combo Sewer Truck from MacQueen Equipment in the amount of $289,954.60. • Motion to approve purchase of a 2022 Mack Granite 64FR Tandem Axle from Nuss Truck & Equipment in the amount of $132,387.47. Supporting Documents • August 17, 2021 Executive Summary (2 pages) • MacQueen Equipment Quote (3 pages) • Nuss Truck & Equipment Quote (19 pages) Golden Valley City Council Meeting August 17, 2021 Agenda Item 3. E. 1. Approve Purchase of a Vactor Combo Sewer Truck Prepared By Tim Kieffer, Public Works Director Marshall Beugen, Street and Vehicle Maintenance Superintendent Joe Hansen, Utility Maintenance Superintendent Summary Unit 699, a 2012 Vactor 2100 has reached its useful life cycle and should be replaced. Staff evaluate vehicles and equipment on an annual basis to determine replacement programing. During inspection, it was discovered the vacuum and jetting systems need repairs. Staff was informed it would cost over 62,000 to make the repairs. The Vactor was originally scheduled for replacement in 2024 but staff proposes to purchase a new Vactor instead of repairing it due to the diminished rate of return. Lead time for the new truck is 13 month so the City would not take delivery until the middle of 2022.The Vactor is used to clean and remove debris from sanitary and storm sewers and during excavations and water main breaks. The Vactor meets replacement criteria set forth in the City’s vehicle replacement policy and Vehicle Condition Index (VCI). The VCI index is a tool utilized to assess all vehicles and equipment scheduled for replacement and any vehicle/equipment scoring 28 points and above meets the category of “needs immediate consideration.” The existing truck due for replacement scored 31 points. Financial Or Budget Considerations Staff recommends purchasing the equipment from the state contract through the State of Minnesota’s cooperative purchasing venture (CPV). The Minnesota Materials Management Division has awarded contract number 191591 through the CPV. The 2021 Water and Sewer Capital Improvement Program (CIP) includes $550,000 for the purchase of a Combination Jet/Vactor truck (W&SS-100) in 2024. Projects W&SS-083 and W&SS-107 have been postponed to keep within budget. City Council Regular Meeting Executive Summary City of Golden Valley August 17, 2021 2 Under Minnesota Statutes Section 471.345, the City may dispose of retired equipment by trading it in. MacQueen Equipment has offered $96,400 for trade-in of Unit 699. Staff believes this is a fair offer due to the needed repairs. The total cost for the Vactor is $493,842.60. The total remittance to vendor with the $96,400 trade-in is $397,442.60. Recommended Action Motion to approve purchase of a 2022 Vactor 2100I Combo Sewer Truck from MacQueen Equipment in the amount of $397,442.60. Supporting Documents MacQueen Equipment Quote (3 pages) Golden Valley Vactor 2100I 7.28.21 01 - ST PAUL MN 11/22/2021 13:15:40 (O) 3 03 GOLDE001 7635453781 E01326 CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY PURCHASE ORDER 7800 Golden Valley Rd Golden Valley MN 55427 AARON WINDSETH 171 Description Amount 2012 VACTOR 2100PD PLUS COMBO SEWER TRUCK FREIGHTLINER 114SD TANDEM AXLE CHASSIS CUSTOMER TRUCK TO BE IN WORKING ORDER AT TIME OF TRADE-IN Subtotal: 289954.60 IN HOUSE CHARGE: 289954.60 CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY 12-07-21 ________________________________ Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ______________________________ Timothy J. Cruikshank City Manager Print Date & Time 12/1/2021 7:45 VENDOR NAME MAKE AND MODEL This section for use when ordering WB 284 CA 196.5 Grand Total 132,387.47$ AF 106 Rear Ratio 4.19 Cab Color MACK WHITE Wheel Color ALUMINUM Notes Spec #Description Qty 2022 Price Subtotal 1.0 Price for Base Unit:1 92,625.00$ 92,625.00$ 2.0 FRAME OPTIONS 1 2.1 Front frame extension 1 886.00$ 886.00$ 2.2 Custom hole punching in frame 100.00$ -$ 2.3 Deduct for no front bumper -$ 2.4 Frame fastener option (bolt or huck spun)1 STD 2.5 Frame, R.B.M., S.M., PSI, CT -$ 2.6 2,120,000 17.7 120,000 87 - 112 CA (64.00)$ -$ 2.7 2,120,000 17.7 120,000 113 - 133 CA STD 2.8 2,120,000 17.7 120,000 134 - 152 CA 107.00$ -$ 2.9 2,120,000 17.7 120,000 153 - 199 CA 406.00$ -$ 2.10 2,120,000 17.7 120,000 200 - 236 CA 482.00$ -$ 2.11 2,470,000 20.6 120,000 87 - 112 CA 176.00$ -$ 2.12 2,470,000 20.6 120,000 113 - 133 CA 240.00$ -$ 2.13 2,470,000 20.6 120,000 134 - 152 CA 347.00$ -$ 2.14 2,470,000 20.6 120,000 153 - 199 CA 646.00$ -$ 2.15 2,470,000 20.6 120,000 200 - 236 CA 722.00$ -$ 2.16 2.820,000 23.5 120,000 87 - 112 CA 521.00$ -$ 2.17 2.820,000 23.5 120,000 113 - 133 CA 585.00$ -$ 2.18 2.820,000 23.5 120,000 134 - 152 CA 692.00$ -$ 2.19 2.820,000 23.5 120,000 153 - 199 CA 991.00$ -$ 2.20 2.820,000 23.5 120,000 200 - 236 CA 1,067.00$ -$ 2.21 3,160,000 26.3 120,000 87 - 112 CA 744.00$ -$ 2.22 3,160,000 26.3 120,000 113 - 133 CA 808.00$ -$ 2.23 3,160,000 26.3 120,000 134 - 152 CA 915.00$ -$ 2.24 3,160,000 26.3 120,000 153 - 199 CA 1,214.00$ -$ 2.25 3,160,000 26.3 120,000 200 - 236 CA 1,290.00$ -$ 2.26 DOUBLE FRAME - PARTIAL IC REINFORCEMENT -$ 2.27 3,230,000 26.9 120,000 87 - 112 CA 801.00$ -$ 2.28 3,230,000 26.9 120,000 113 - 133 CA 865.00$ -$ 2.29 3,230,000 26.9 120,000 134 - 152 CA 972.00$ -$ 2.30 3,230,000 26.9 120,000 153 - 199 CA 1,214.00$ -$ 2.31 3,230,000 26.9 120,000 200 - 236 CA 1,290.00$ -$ 2.32 3,580,000 29.8 120,000 87 - 112 CA 1,041.00$ -$ TANDEM AXLE CAB/CHASSIS Exhibit D: Price Schedule NUSS TRUCK & EQUIPMENT 2023 MACK GRANITE 64FR (T) TA CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY - VACTOR 2.33 3,580,000 29.8 120,000 113 - 133 CA 1,105.00$ -$ 2.34 3,580,000 29.8 120,000 134 - 152 CA 1,212.00$ -$ 2.35 3,580,000 29.8 120,000 153 - 199 CA 1,511.00$ -$ 2.36 3,580,000 29.8 120,000 200 - 236 CA 1,587.00$ -$ 2.37 3,920,000 32.7 120,000 87 - 112 CA 1,376.00$ -$ 2.38 3,920,000 32.7 120,000 113 - 133 CA 1,450.00$ -$ 2.39 3,920,000 32.7 120,000 134 - 152 CA 1,657.00$ -$ 2.40 3,920,000 32.7 120,000 153 - 199 CA 1,856.00$ -$ 2.41 3,920,000 32.7 120,000 200 - 236 CA 1,932.00$ -$ 2.42 4,260,000 35.5 120,000 87 - 112 CA 1,832.00$ -$ 2.43 4,260,000 35.5 120,000 113 - 133 CA 1,673.00$ -$ 2.44 4,260,000 35.5 120,000 134 - 152 CA 2,003.00$ -$ 2.45 4,260,000 35.5 120,000 154 - 199 CA 2,301.00$ -$ 2.46 4,260,000 35.5 120,000 200 - 236 CA 2,384.00$ -$ 2.47 DOUBLE FRAME - FULL IC REINFORCEMENT -$ 2.48 3,230,000 26.9 120,000 87 - 112 CA 1,001.00$ -$ 2.49 3,230,000 26.9 120,000 113 - 133 CA 1,065.00$ -$ 2.50 3,230,000 26.9 120,000 134 - 152 CA 1,172.00$ -$ 2.51 3,230,000 26.9 120,000 153 - 199 CA 1,414.00$ -$ 2.52 3,230,000 26.9 120,000 200 - 236 CA 1,490.00$ -$ 2.53 3,580,000 29.8 120,000 87 - 112 CA 1,241.00$ -$ 2.54 3,580,000 29.8 120,000 113 - 133 CA 1,305.00$ -$ 2.55 3,580,000 29.8 120,000 134 - 152 CA 1,412.00$ -$ 2.56 3,580,000 29.8 120,000 153 - 199 CA 1,711.00$ -$ 2.57 3,580,000 29.8 120,000 200 - 236 CA 1,787.00$ -$ 2.58 3,580,000 29.8 120,000 87 - 112 CA 1,576.00$ -$ 2.59 3,580,000 29.8 120,000 113 - 133 CA 1,650.00$ -$ 2.60 3,580,000 29.8 120,000 134 - 152 CA 1,857.00$ -$ 2.61 3,580,000 29.8 120,000 153 - 199 CA 2,056.00$ -$ 2.62 3,580,000 29.8 120,000 200 - 236 CA 1,787.00$ -$ 2.63 3,920,000 32.7 120,000 87 - 112 CA 1,576.00$ -$ 2.64 3,920,000 32.7 120,000 113 - 133 CA 1,650.00$ -$ 2.65 3,920,000 32.7 120,000 134 - 152 CA 1,857.00$ -$ 2.66 3,920,000 32.7 120,000 153 - 199 CA 1 2,056.00$ 2,056.00$ 2.67 3,920,000 32.7 120,000 200 - 236 CA 2,132.00$ -$ 2.68 4,260,000 35.5 120,000 87 - 112 CA 2,032.00$ -$ 2.69 4,260,000 35.5 120,000 113 - 133 CA 1,873.00$ -$ 2.70 4,260,000 35.5 120,000 134 - 152 CA 2,203.00$ -$ 2.71 4,260,000 35.5 120,000 153 - 199 CA 2,501.00$ -$ 2.72 4,260,000 35.5 120,000 200 - 236 CA 2,584.00$ -$ 2.73 TRIPLE FRAME - FULL IC REINFORCEMENT -$ 2.74 5,688,000 47.4 120,000 87 - 112 CA 4,960.00$ -$ 2.75 5,688,000 47.4 120,000 113 - 133 CA 5,024.00$ -$ 2.76 5,688,000 47.4 120,000 134 - 152 CA 5,131.00$ -$ 2.77 5,688,000 47.4 120,000 153 - 199 CA 5,430.00$ -$ 2.78 5,688,000 47.4 120,000 200 - 236 CA 5,506.00$ -$ 2.79 Flush bright finish channel steel 113.00$ -$ 2.80 Extended stylized-silver-bright finish steel w/stone guard 1,495.00$ -$ 2.81 Extended - swept back steel, bright finish with stone guard - includes center tow pin 1,139.00$ -$ 2.82 Mill finish, flush mounted, unpainted aluminum 68.00$ -$ 2.83 Extended swept back channel steel (includes center tow pin) w/stone guard 805.00$ -$ 2.84 Extended swept back channel steel with bright finish w/painted center tow pin 620.00$ -$ 2.85 Extended swept back steel channel w/bright finish 258.00$ -$ 2.86 Extended swept back painted steel 1 STD 2.87 Flush painted steel (15.00)$ -$ 2.88 Flush stainless clad aluminum 143.00$ -$ 2.89 Plate type radiator guard 105.00$ -$ 2.90 Bright finish plate type radiator guard 258.00$ -$ 2.91 Tectyl 185 GW pigmented compound between frame rails 1 110.00$ 110.00$ 2.92 BOC crossmember, steel HD back to back channel intermediate 66.00$ -$ 2.93 BOC & intermediate crossmember, HD I-Beam 1 332.00$ 332.00$ 2.94 Frame rail clearance 62.00$ -$ 2.99 1 3.0 FRONT AXLE/SUSPENSION/BRAKE/OPTION 1 3.1 Set forward front axle option 1 STD 3.2 12,000 front axle & matching suspension - Mack FXL12 STD 3.3 14,600 front axle & matching suspension - Mack FXL14.6 771.00$ -$ 3.4 16,000 front axle and matching suspension -$ 3.5 18,000 front axle and matching suspension - Mack FXL18 1,361.00$ -$ 3.6 20,000 front axle and matching suspension - Mack FXL20 1 2,147.00$ 2,147.00$ 3.7 23,000 front axle and matching suspension - Mack FXL23 2,448.00$ -$ 3.8 Heavy duty front axle shocks 1 STD 3.9 Front stabilizer bar -$ 3.10 Right hand air bag suspension per Spec 3.6, Driver controlled -$ 3.11 Left air bag suspension per Spec 3.6, Driver controlled -$ 3.12 Front axle lubrication cap with slotted venthole -$ 3.13 Front brake dust shields 1 18.00$ 18.00$ 3.14 Dual front auxiliary steering gear 1 569.00$ 569.00$ 3.15 RH spring build up for wing plow application 30.00$ -$ 3.16 LH spring build up for wing plow application 30.00$ -$ 3.17 All wheel drive front axle 43,000.00$ -$ 3.18 Twin Steer Front Axle 12,612.00$ -$ 3.19 Aluminum front hubs 53.00$ -$ 3.20 Centerfuse outboard mounted brake drums 217.00$ -$ 3.21 Multileaf front spring ILO taperleaf (2 leaf spring)35.00$ -$ 3.22 HD mulitileaf front spring ILO taperleaf (2 leaf spring)65.00$ -$ 3.23 HD taperleaf (3 leaf spring) ILO of taperleaf (2 leaf spring)65.00$ -$ 3.24 Meritor EX+ Air Disc Brakes requires Meritor rear brakes 653.00$ -$ 3.25 Meritor front slack adjustors - Need same slack on rear axle 1.00$ -$ 3.26 Meritor front slack with stainless steel pins 58.00$ -$ 3.27 Haldex front slack adjustors - Need same slack adjustor on rear axle 1 STD 3.28 Haldex front slack with stainless steel pins 57.00$ -$ 3.29 Meritor front brakes ILO of Bendix - requires Meritor rear brakes 1 131.00$ 131.00$ 3.30 Power steering reservoir with visible sight glass 30.00$ -$ 3.99 1 4.0 4.0 TANDEM REAR AXLE/SUSPENSION/BRAKE/OPTIONS 1 4.1 46,000# rear axle & matching suspension Make & Model - Mack SS462 Mack Camelback Suspension 1 2,240.00$ 2,240.00$ 4.2 40,000# walking beam rear suspension and axle Make & Model - Meritor MT-40-14X4D with Hendrickson HMX400 1,558.00$ -$ 4.3 46,000# walking beam rear suspension and axle Make & Model Meritor RT-46-160 with Hendrickson HMX460 3,362.00$ -$ 4.4 40,000# air suspension and axle Make & Model Meritor MT- 40-14X4D with Mack AL461 46,000 lbs. air suspension 1,578.00$ -$ 4.5 46,000# air suspension and axle Make & Model Meritor RT-46- 160 with Mack AL461 46,000 lbs. air suspension 2,976.00$ -$ 4.6 Dash mounted air dump system - With air ride suspension STD 4.7 Driver activated differential lock on one rear axle (front axle ____ rear axle ____, check one)484.00$ -$ 4.8 Driver activated differential lock on both front and rear axles 1 968.00$ 968.00$ 4.9 Driver activated differential lock on both front and rear axles, and lubrication pump and filter system 1,210.00$ -$ 4.10 Meritor MT-40-14X4DP, both axles driver differential lock and pump, HMX400 40,000 # walking beam suspension 2,768.00$ -$ 4.11 Meritor RT-46-160P, both axles driver differential lock and pump, HMX460 46,000 # walking beam suspension 4,572.00$ -$ 4.12 ½ round universal joints 1 STD 4.13 Spicer 1810 HD drive line with half round universal joints 126.00$ -$ 4.14 Rear Dust Shields 1 34.00$ 34.00$ 4.15 Driver activated differential lock on both front and rear axles with individual switches 1,102.00$ -$ 4.16 Meritor 18 MXL extended lube 1 31.00$ 31.00$ 4.17 Meritor 176 MXL extended lube 32.00$ -$ 4.18 Dana-spicer SPL170XL extended lube series 453.00$ -$ 4.19 Dana-spicer SPL250XL extended lube series 493.00$ -$ 4.20 Dana-spicer SPL250HDXL extended lube series 502.00$ -$ 4.21 Dana-spicer SPL350HDXL extended lube series 776.00$ -$ 4.22 Mack S38R fabricated steel housing STD 4.23 Mack SB38 fabricated steel housing -40,000 # recertification 450.00$ -$ 4.24 Mack S40 40,000 # rear axle 450.00$ -$ 4.25 Mack S402 40,000 # cast iron housing 450.00$ -$ 4.26 Mack S440 44,000# fabricated steel housing 1,350.00$ -$ 4.27 Mack S440-46 fabricated steel housing - recertification 1,350.00$ -$ 4.28 Mack S462 46,000# cast ductile iron housing 1,800.00$ -$ 4.29 Mack S462R 46,000# cast ductile iron housing 1,800.00$ -$ 4.30 Meritor 40,000# MT-40-14X4C Amboid (High Entry)765.00$ -$ 4.31 Meritor 40,000# MT-40-14X4C Hypoid (Low Entry)765.00$ -$ 4.32 Meritor 46,000# RT-46-160 2,163.00$ -$ 4.33 Meritor 46,000# Rt-46-164EH 2,163.00$ -$ 4.34 Spicer 46,000# DS405 2,628.00$ -$ 4.35 Spicer 46,000# D46-170H 4,305.00$ -$ 4.36 Mack SS38 Mack multileaf camelback spring without anti-sway springs (80.00)$ -$ 4.37 Mack SS38 multileaf camelback spring with anti-sway springs STD 4.38 Mack SSB 38 multileaf camelback spring (boost-a-load)(40.00)$ -$ 4.39 Mack SSB 38 multileaf camelback spring 40,000# recertification 273.00$ -$ 4.40 Mack SS40 44,000# multileaf camelback suspension without anti sway 226.00$ -$ 4.41 Mack SS40 44,000# multileaf camelback suspension with anti sway 330.00$ -$ 4.42 Mack SS40 44,000# multileaf camelback suspension 46,000# - recertification 228.00$ -$ 4.43 Mack SS462 44,000# multileaf camelback suspension without anti sway 336.00$ -$ 4.44 Mack SS462 44,000# multileaf camelback suspension with anti sway 440.00$ -$ 4.45 Mack AL-461 46,000# air ride 813.00$ -$ 4.46 Mack M-Ride 40 parabolic 2-leaf, 40,000# normal stiffness 959.00$ -$ 4.47 Mack M-Ride 40 parabolic 3-leaf, 40,000# stiffer than normal 959.00$ -$ 4.48 Mack M-Ride 46 parabolic 3-leaf 46,000#1,289.00$ -$ 4.49 HMX 400 Hendrickson Haulmax rubber suspension 40,000#803.00$ -$ 4.50 HMX 460 Hendrickson Haulmax rubber suspension 46,000#1,199.00$ -$ 4.51 Chambers 46,000# L high stability W#29 can 3,798.00$ -$ 4.52 PAX 460 High Stability Hendrickson Primaxx Air Suspension 1,319.00$ -$ 4.53 PAX 462 High Stability Hendrickson Primaxx Air Suspension 1,319.00$ -$ 4.54 Neway AD-246 air ride suspension 1,825.00$ -$ 4.55 Neway AD-252 air ride suspension 2,287.00$ -$ 4.56 Delete power divider lockout (153.00)$ -$ 4.57 Urethane bushing on Mack camelback suspension (58.00)$ -$ 4.58 55" axle spacing 1 122.00$ 122.00$ 4.59 60" axle spacing 317.00$ -$ 4.60 Dual leveling valve air suspension height control 149.00$ -$ 4.61 Mack CRDP1501/1511 with interwheel power divider - both axles 2,735.00$ -$ 4.62 Outboard centrifuse rear brake drums 206.00$ -$ 4.63 Haldex automatic rear slack adjustor 1 STD 4.64 Haldex automatic rear slack adjustor with stainless steel pins 96.00$ -$ 4.65 Meritor automatic rear slack adjustor 1.00$ -$ 4.66 Meritor automatic rear slack adjustor with stainless steel pins 231.00$ -$ 4.67 Haldex S-ABA slack adjustors 50.00$ -$ 4.68 30/36 rear brake chamber 156.00$ -$ 4.69 Comet aluminum hubs w/preset bearings & seals 385.00$ -$ 4.70 Aluminum preset rear hubs with integrated spindle nut 37.00$ -$ 4.71 Chicago Rawhide (Scotseal Longlife) oil seal 59.00$ -$ 4.72 National/Federal Mogul 23.00$ -$ 4.73 Stemco-Grit Guard oil seals 63.00$ -$ 4.74 Stemco - Guardian oil seal 31.00$ -$ 4.75 Stemco (Voyager) oil seals (5.00)$ -$ 4.76 Scotseal longlife rear oil seals 59.00$ -$ 4.77 Air Disc Brake (17") H-Type - Require Air Disc Front Brakes & M-Ride 3 leaf suspension 2,430.00$ -$ 4.78 Bendix ES165-08D, 16.5" x 8 5/8" Cast Spider - Require M-Ride suspension. N/A with dust shields 272.00$ -$ 4.79 Meritor rear brakes - 16.5"7" Q+1 115.00$ 115.00$ 4.80 Meritor rear brakes - 16.5" x 8 5/8+ Q+ - N/A with dust shields 291.00$ -$ 4.81 Meritor rear brakes - 16.5" x 8"+ Q+ - N/A with dust shields 213.00$ -$ 4.82 13,500 lbs. Hendrickson steerable composite HLUC-2 pusher axle - includes tires and rims 9,791.00$ -$ 4.83 10,000 lbs. Hendrickson steerable composite HLUC-2 pusher axle - includes tires and rims 9,791.00$ -$ 4.84 20,000 lbs. Watson-Chalin steerable SL-2089 Thu Track Series pusher axle - includes tire and rims 12,381.00$ -$ 4.85 13,200 lbs. Watson-Chalin steerable SL-1187 Thu Track Series pusher axle - includes tire and rims 10,173.00$ -$ 4.86 20,000 lbs. Watson-Chalin non-steerable AL-2200 Atlas Series pusher axle - includes tire and rims 9,198.00$ -$ 4.87 20,000 lbs. Hendrickson non - steerable composite HLM pusher axle - includes tires and rims 9,091.00$ -$ 4.88 13,200 lbs. Hendrickson steerable HLUS2Z pusher axle - includes tires and rims 9,791.00$ -$ 4.89 20,000 lbs. Hendrickson Paralift HLP20 steerable pusher axle - includes tires and rims 11,192.00$ -$ 4.90 13,500 lbs. Hendrickson steerable composite HLUC-2 tag axle - includes tires and rims 9,791.00$ -$ 4.91 10,000 lbs. Hendrickson steerable composite HLUC-2 tag axle - includes tires and rims 9,791.00$ -$ 4.92 20,000 lbs. Watson-Chalin steerable SL-2089 Thu Track Series tag axle - includes tire and rims 12,381.00$ -$ 4.93 13,200 lbs. Watson-Chalin steerable SL-1187 Thu Track Series tag axle - includes tire and rims 10,173.00$ -$ 4.94 20,000 lbs. Watson-Chalin non-steerable AL-2200 Atlas Series tag axle - includes tire and rims 9,198.00$ -$ 4.95 20,000 lbs. Hendrickson non - steerable composite HLM tag axle - includes tires and rims 9,091.00$ -$ 4.96 13,200 lbs. Hendrickson steerable HLUS2Z tag axle - includes tires and rims 9,791.00$ -$ 4.97 20,000 lbs. Hendrickson Paralift HLP20 steerable tag axle - includes tires and rims 11,192.00$ -$ 4.98 6S/6M systems sensing both rear axle wheel end sensors 440.00$ -$ 4.99 Furnish Meritor wide track axle option - Need for Super Singles 1,032.00$ -$ 4.99 1 5.0 Fifth Wheel options 1 5.1 Frame end tapered and open -$ 5.2 Frame end tapered and closed 30.00$ -$ 5.3 Fixed fifth wheel - Holland FW-35 684.00$ -$ 5.4 Mechanical slide fifth wheel - Holland FW35 Travel - 24" slide 562.00$ -$ 5.5 Air operated slide fifth wheel - Holland FW35 Travel 24" slide 986.00$ -$ 5.6 Stainless 1/4 fenders, mounted front of tandems 109.00$ -$ 5.7 Plastic 1/4 fenders, mounted front of tandems 110.00$ -$ 5.8 Tractor package hookup 297.00$ -$ 5.9 Behind cab deck plate 681.00$ -$ 5.10 Holland fixed with non-tilt 5th wheel 1,385.00$ -$ 5.11 Holland manual slide 5th wheel 537.00$ -$ 5.12 Mack mud flaps with brackets 98.00$ -$ 5.13 Betts B60 stainless steel angled mud flap brackets 161.00$ -$ 5.14 Hose tender & towel bar assembly 48.00$ -$ 5.15 Coiled trailer air hose 28.00$ -$ 5.16 Coiled trailer electrical hose 44.00$ -$ 5.17 Air Weight AW5800 onboard scales 963.00$ -$ 5.18 Medium height 5th wheel ramp guide 192.00$ -$ 5.19 Trailer hook up light 37.00$ -$ 5.99 1 6.0 TIRES/RIMS OPTIONS: 6.1 Nylon wafers or wheel guards on all wheels (10 ea.)1 44.00$ 44.00$ 6.2 Heavier 7500 lb. 22.5 x 8.25 Steel rims in lieu of standard 7300# rims (10 ea.) 1 STD 6.3 Heavier 7500 lb. 22.5 x 8.25 Steel rims in lieu of standard 7300# rims (8 ea.) in rear only 16.00$ -$ 6.4 11R 22.5 H front tires 39.00$ -$ 6.5 12R 22.5 H front tires 198.00$ -$ 6.6 9000 lb. 22.5 9” front steel rims, 315/80R 22.5 J front tires 187.00$ -$ 6.7 10,000 lb. 22.5 9” front steel rims, 315/80R 22.5 J front tires 407.00$ -$ 6.8 10,500 lb. 22.5 x 12.25 front steel rims, 385/65R 22.5 J front tires 609.00$ -$ 6.9 10,500 lb. 22.5 x 12.25 front steel rims, 425/65R 22.5 J front tires 1 669.00$ 669.00$ 6.10 11R 22.5 H rear tires 1 656.00$ 656.00$ 6.11 7,300 lb. 24.5” x 8.25” steel front rims 5.00$ -$ 6.12 7300 lb. 24.5” x 8.25” rear steel rims 44.00$ -$ 6.13 8,000 lb. 24.5” x 8.25" steel front rims 10.00$ -$ 6.14 8,000 lb. 24.5” x 8.25” steel rear rims 164.00$ -$ 6.15 11R 24.5 G front tires 63.00$ -$ 6.16 11R 24.5 H front tires 105.00$ -$ 6.17 11R 24.5 G rear tires 164.00$ -$ 6.18 11R 24.5 H rear tires 480.00$ -$ 6.19 Steel spare rim, size 22.5 x 8.25 125.00$ -$ 6.20 Steel spare rim, size 24.5 x 8.25 148.00$ -$ 6.21 Steel spare rim, size 22.5 x 9.0 380.00$ -$ 6.22 Steel spare rim, size 22.5 x 12.25 430.00$ -$ 6.23 12R22.5 H front tires 439.00$ -$ 6.24 12R 22.5 H rear tires 1,752.00$ -$ 6.25 Wheel lug wrench - includes handle 48.00$ -$ 6.26 Aluminum front wheel - 22.5 x 8.25 141.00$ -$ 6.27 Aluminum front wheel - 24.5 x 8.25 156.00$ -$ 6.28 Aluminum front wheel - 22.5 x 9.0 329.00$ -$ 6.29 Aluminum front wheel - 22.5 x 12.25 1 387.00$ 387.00$ 6.30 Polished aluminum front wheel 48.00$ -$ 6.31 Dura-bright bright finish front wheels 204.00$ -$ 6.32 Wheel finishing with extra polished front wheels 76.00$ -$ 6.33 Aluminum rear wheels - 22.5 x 8.25 1 492.00$ 492.00$ 6.34 Aluminum rear wheels - 24.5 x 8.25 600.00$ -$ 6.35 Polished aluminum rear wheel four outboard of dual wheels 132.00$ -$ 6.36 Polished aluminum rear wheel all eight (8) wheels 265.00$ -$ 6.37 Dura-bright bright finish on all eight (8) rear wheels 1,334.00$ -$ 6.38 Dura-bright bright finish on all four (4) outboard rear wheels 667.00$ -$ 6.39 11R22.5 G Bridgestone M843 front tires 223.00$ -$ 6.40 11R22.5 G Michelin XZE2 front tires 296.00$ -$ 6.41 315/80R22.5 L Michelin XZA1 front tires 532.00$ -$ 6.42 385/65R22.5 J Michelin XZY3 front tires 712.00$ -$ 6.43 425/65R22.5 L Michelin XZY3 front tires 959.00$ -$ 6.44 11R22.5 G Bridgestone M843 rear tires 892.00$ -$ 6.45 11R22.5 G Michelin XDN2 rear tires 1,892.00$ -$ 6.46 11R22.5 H Michelin XDN2 rear tires 1,964.00$ -$ 6.47 11R22.5 G Goodyear G622RSD rear tires 2,504.00$ -$ 6.48 11R22.5 H Goodyear G622RSD rear tires 2,672.00$ -$ 6.99 1 7.0 BRAKE SYSTEM OPTIONS:1 7.1 Wabco System Saver 1200 E heated air dryer STD 7.2 Manual cable drain valves on air tanks with lanyard on all tanks 24.00$ -$ 7.3 Heated air tank -$ 7.4 Auto drain valves on air tanks 31.00$ -$ 7.5 MGM type TR-T rear brake chambers 50.00$ -$ 7.6 S.S. pins on slack adjuster yoke (2 ea. per yoke) For all air brake chambers -$ 7.7 Inverted rear brake chamber mounting in lieu of regular mounting -$ 7.8 Relocate air dryer 49.00$ -$ 7.9 Bendix AD9 heated air dryer 118.00$ -$ 7.10 Bendix AD-IP heated air dryer 1 164.00$ 164.00$ 7.11 Meritor/Wabco system twin heated air dryer 539.00$ -$ 7.12 Auto heated drain valve- heated supply tank, manual petcock 42.00$ -$ 7.13 Auto heated drain valve- heated supply tank, with lanyard on all other tanks 1 72.00$ 72.00$ 7.14 Aluminum air reservoirs 1 192.00$ 192.00$ 7.15 Polished aluminum air reservoirs 252.00$ -$ 7.16 Increase air capacity for installation of extra axles 289.00$ -$ 7.17 MACK Road Stability Adv. Bendix ABS/ATC/RSA w/YAW control with mud/snow switch 1,873.00$ -$ 7.18 Meritor/Wabco ABS system w/o automatic traction control 142.00$ -$ 7.19 Bendix ABS system with traction control 1 270.00$ 270.00$ 7.20 Meritor/Wabco ABS system w/auto traction control 357.00$ -$ 7.21 Furnish automatic traction control (ATC full disable switch)1 105.00$ 105.00$ 7.22 Lanyard control on supply wet tank 16.00$ -$ 7.23 Haldex "Gold Seal" brake chamber 1.00$ -$ 7.24 Haldex "Life Seal" brake chamber STD 7.25 MGM TR 30/30 LP3 (3" Stroke) brake chamber 105.00$ -$ 7.26 MGM LTR (3" Stroke) brake chamber 285.00$ -$ 7.27 MGM TR3030LP3THD 1 133.00$ 133.00$ 7.28 MGM TR-T (Tamper Resistant brake chamber) reclock inlet ports for optimum ground clearance 68.00$ -$ 7.29 Haldex "Gold Seal" 3.0" stroke brake chamber 399.00$ -$ 7.30 Electric horn sound when driver door open with park brake released 67.00$ -$ 7.31 Alarm to sound when driver door open & parking brake not on 43.00$ -$ 7.32 Schreader valve located in supply tank 47.00$ -$ 7.33 Schreader valve, secondary 47.00$ -$ 7.34 Two (2) valve dual brake system-trailer supply and tractor-trailer park 42.00$ -$ 7.35 Relocate all air reservoir in frame 1 48.00$ 48.00$ 7.36 Air reservoir in frame, one reservoir on the RH rail behind Cleartech 1 48.00$ 48.00$ 7.37 Never-seize to brake shoes pins & cam rollers 33.00$ -$ 7.99 1 8.0 ENGINE/EXHAUST AND FUEL TANKS OPTIONS:1 8.1 Mack MP7-325M 325HP@1400-1900 RPM (Peak) 2100 RPM Gov 1250 LB-FT Torque STD 8.2 Mack MP7-355A 355HP@1500-1800 RPM (Peak) 2100 RPM Gov 1250 LB-FT Torque 481.00$ -$ 8.3 Mack MP7-375M 375HP@1500-1900 RPM (Peak) 2100 RPM Gov 1360 LB-FT Torque 813.00$ -$ 8.4 Mack MP7-425M 425HP@1500-1800 RPM (Peak) 2100 RPM Gov 1560 LB-FT Torque 1,508.00$ -$ 8.5 Mack MP7-345C 345HP@1450-1700 RPM (Peak) 1950 RPM Gov 1360 LB-FT Torque 300.00$ -$ 8.6 Mack MP7-365C 365HP@1400-1700 RPM (Peak) 1950 RPM Gov 1460 LB-FT Torque 651.00$ -$ 8.7 Mack MP7-395A 395HP@1450-1700 RPM (Peak) 1950 RPMGov 1560 LB-FT Torque 1,112.00$ -$ 8.8 Mack MP7-395C 395HP@1450-1700 RPM (Peak) 1950 RPM Gov 1560 LB-FT Torque 1,112.00$ -$ 8.9 Mack MP8-415C 415HP@1400-1700 RPM (Peak) 1950 RPM Gov 1660 LB-FT Torque 2,064.00$ -$ 8.10 Mack MP8-445C 445HP@1300-1700 RPM (Peak) 1950 RPM Gov 1860 LB-FT Torque 1 2,589.00$ 2,589.00$ 8.11 Mack MP8-505C 505HP@1500-1700 RPM (Peak) 1950 RPM Gov 1860 LB-FT Torque 3,311.00$ -$ 8.12 Mack MP8-425M 425HP@1500-1900 RPM (Peak) 21000 RPM Gov 1560 LB-FT Torque 2,247.00$ -$ 8.13 Mack MP8-455M 455HP@1500-1900 RPM (Peak) 21000 RPM Gov 1760 LB-FT Torque 2,635.00$ -$ 8.14 Mack MP8-505M 5055HP@1500-1900 RPM (Peak) 21000 RPM Gov 1860 LB-FT Torque 3,759.00$ -$ 8.15 Clear Back of Cab - DPF & SCR Frame Mounted , RH Side under Cab 1 114.00$ 114.00$ 8.16 PK7-17C2 93 gallon sleeved fuel tank, 20" clearance for outrigger/wing plow 317.00$ -$ 8.17 Cleartech, DPF RH side under cab w/SCR vertical RH side of cab 601.00$ -$ 8.18 Cleartech with DPF vertical RH side BOC, w/SCR vertical LH side BOC 3,308.00$ -$ 8.19 No Muffler, Single (R/S) Vertical Exhaust Cab Mounted, Lower Ventura Diffuser, Turned End 1 318.00$ 318.00$ 8.20 No Muffler, Single (R/S) Vertical Exhaust Cab Mounted, Lower Ventura Diffuser, Plain End 318.00$ -$ 8.21 Single (R/S) Vertical Straight Exhaust Stack Plain End (16.00)$ -$ 8.22 Single (R/S) Vertical Straight Exhaust Stack Turned Out 1 STD 8.23 Single (R/S) Vertical Straight Exhaust Stack Plain End Perf Stack Diffuser 32.00$ -$ 8.24 Single (R/S) Vertical Straight Exhaust Stack Plain End Side Outlet Diffuser 126.00$ -$ 8.25 Single (R/S) Vertical Straight Exhaust Stack Plain Top Outlet Diffuser 126.00$ -$ 8.26 Dual Vertical Straight Exhaust Stack Plain End - N/A with Allison Transmission 1,065.00$ -$ 8.27 Dual Vertical Straight Exhaust Stack Turned Out End - N/A with Allison Transmission 1,091.00$ -$ 8.28 Dual Vertical Straight Exhaust Stack Plain Side Outlet Diffuser - N/A with Allison Transmission 1,507.00$ -$ 8.29 Dual Vertical Straight Exhaust Stack Plain Top Outlet Diffuser - N/A with Allison Transmission 1,507.00$ -$ 8.30 Single, Bright finish heat shield & stack 1 65.00$ 65.00$ 8.31 Dual, Bright finish heat shield & stack 130.00$ -$ 8.32 Single, Bright finish heat shield, stack & elbow 162.00$ -$ 8.33 Dual, Bright finish heat shield, stack & elbow 344.00$ -$ 8.34 Single, Bright finish stack only 50.00$ -$ 8.35 Dual, Bright finish stack only 99.00$ -$ 8.36 Single, Bright finish lower elbow & stack 148.00$ -$ 8.37 Dual, Bright finish lower elbow & stack 294.00$ -$ 8.38 Single, Bright finish heat shield only 16.00$ -$ 8.39 Dual, Bright finish heat shield only 31.00$ -$ 8.40 Bright finish stainless steel heat shield for frame mounted Mack Cap DPF 1 171.00$ 171.00$ 8.41 50 Gallon LH steel 22" Dia fuel tank (118.00)$ -$ 8.42 66 Gallon LH steel 22" Dia fuel tank (96.00)$ -$ 8.43 72 Gallon LH steel 26" Dia fuel tank (62.00)$ -$ 8.44 88 Gallon LH steel 22" Dia fuel tank 164.00$ -$ 8.45 93 Gallon LH steel 26" Dia fuel tank 267.00$ -$ 8.46 116 Gallon LH steel 22" Dia fuel tank 222.00$ -$ 8.47 50 Gallon LH aluminum 22" Dia fuel tank (64.00)$ -$ 8.48 66 Gallon LH aluminum 22" Dia fuel tank (45.00)$ -$ 8.49 72 Gallon LH aluminum 26" Dia fuel tank 24.00$ -$ 8.50 88 Gallon LH aluminum 22" Dia fuel tank 231.00$ -$ 8.51 93 Gallon LH aluminum 26" Dia fuel tank 272.00$ -$ 8.52 116 Gallon LH aluminum 22" Dia fuel tank 292.00$ -$ 8.53 50 Gallon LH Steel D-Shape (118.00)$ -$ 8.54 66 Gallon LH Steel D-Shape (68.00)$ -$ 8.55 88 Gallon LH Steel D-Shape 101.00$ -$ 8.56 116 Gallon LH Steel D-Shape 300.00$ -$ 8.57 50 Gallon LH Aluminum D-Shape (118.00)$ -$ 8.58 66 Gallon LH Aluminum D-Shape (27.00)$ -$ 8.59 88 Gallon LH Aluminum D-Shape 173.00$ -$ 8.60 93 Gallon LH Aluminum D-Shape 195.00$ -$ 8.61 116 Gallon LH Aluminum D-Shape 367.00$ -$ 8.62 66 Gallon LH Steel D-Shape with Integral DEF Tank (47.00)$ -$ 8.63 88 Gallon LH Steel D-Shape with Integral DEF Tank 213.00$ -$ 8.64 111 Gallon LH Steel D-Shape with Integral DEF Tank 325.00$ -$ 8.65 66 Gallon LH Aluminum D-Shape with Integral DEF Tank STD 8.66 72 Gallon LH Aluminum D-Shape 26" Dia. with Integral DEF Tank 171.00$ -$ 8.67 88 Gallon LH Aluminum D-Shape with Integral DEF Tank 240.00$ -$ 8.68 93 Gallon LH Aluminum D-Shape 26" Dia. with Integral DEF Tank 1 304.00$ 304.00$ 8.69 111 Gallon LH Aluminum D-Shape with Integral DEF Tank 378.00$ -$ 8.70 111 & 66 Gallon Aluminum D-Shape tanks, 66 Gallon isolated for Hyd oil 839.00$ -$ 8.71 50 Gallon RH steel 22" Dia fuel tank 503.00$ -$ 8.72 66 Gallon RH steel 22" Dia fuel tank 529.00$ -$ 8.73 88 Gallon RH steel 22" Dia fuel tank 814.00$ -$ 8.74 116 Gallon RH steel 22" Dia fuel tank 871.00$ -$ 8.75 50 Gallon RH aluminum 22" Dia fuel tank 570.00$ -$ 8.76 66 Gallon RH aluminum 22" Dia fuel tank 593.00$ -$ 8.77 88 Gallon RH aluminum 22" Dia fuel tank 879.00$ -$ 8.78 116 Gallon RH aluminum 22" Dia fuel tank 849.00$ -$ 8.79 50 Gallon RH Steel D-Shape 503.00$ -$ 8.80 66 Gallon RH Steel D-Shape 566.00$ -$ 8.81 88 Gallon RH Steel D-Shape 751.00$ -$ 8.82 116 Gallon RH Steel D-Shape 950.00$ -$ 8.83 50 Gallon RH Aluminum D-Shape 569.00$ -$ 8.84 66 Gallon RH Aluminum D-Shape 617.00$ -$ 8.85 88 Gallon RH Aluminum D-Shape 822.00$ -$ 8.86 116 Gallon RH Aluminum D-Shape 1,016.00$ -$ 8.87 Single polished aluminum fuel tank 197.00$ -$ 8.88 Dual polished aluminum fuel tank 393.00$ -$ 8.89 Isolate RH fuel tank from fuel system for hyd oil 30.00$ -$ 8.90 Dual draw & return fuel system 82.00$ -$ 8.91 Filter neck screen for fuel tank 71.00$ -$ 8.92 Lockable fuel tank cap 31.00$ -$ 8.93 Bright finish DPF tank cover - Requires with bright finish tanks 171.00$ -$ 8.94 Bright finish DEF tank cover 29.00$ -$ 8.95 Bright Finish Aluminum steps & stainless steel bright finish straps 189.00$ -$ 8.96 Bright Finish Fuel Tank Straps - Single Tank 1 32.00$ 32.00$ 8.97 Flocs oil change system w/disconnecting fittings 114.00$ -$ 8.98 Engine oil drain kit, Flocs, SAE 100R2 hose 136.00$ -$ 8.99 1 9.0 ENGINE RELATED OPTIONS:1 9.1 Oil fill and dipstick EZ access -$ 9.2 Delco 35 SI Brushless Alternator, 135 AMP 102.00$ -$ 9.3 Delco 24 SI Alternator, 130 AMP STD 9.4 Delco 24 SI Alternator, 145 AMP 18.00$ -$ 9.5 Leece-Neville Alternator, 145 AMP 70.00$ -$ 9.6 Dual element air cleaner -$ 9.7 Donaldson Single Stage Air cleaner per spec 12.1 1 278.00$ 278.00$ 9.8 Thumb screws for Donaldson. Single stage Air Cleaner -$ 9.9 Fuel/water separator/heated/ Thermostatically controlled, __ (Brand)-$ 9.10 Davco 382 fuel/water separator, non heated -$ 9.11 Non-heated fuel/water separator, Mack w/manual drain valve (integral w/primary fuel filter STD 9.12 Coolant spin on filter/conditioner 1 47.00$ 47.00$ 9.13 Front engine powered take off adapter and radiator cut out 103.00$ -$ 9.14 Air applied fan drive, Kysor two speed K32 Duro speed fan 135.00$ -$ 9.15 Air applied fan drive, ______(Brand)-$ 9.16 Viscous fan drive - Behr Electronically modulated 1 STD 9.17 Radiator hose package (Silicone) per Spec 12.2 1 240.00$ 240.00$ 9.18 Curved exhaust pipe end 1 STD 9.19 Fuel tank per specification 12.7 -$ 9.20 Engine block heater 1 65.00$ 65.00$ 9.21 In line fuel heater 407.00$ -$ 9.22 In tank fuel heater 351.00$ -$ 9.23 Fuel cooler -$ 9.24 Radiator bug screen 1 STD 9.25 Engine brake system 1 604.00$ 604.00$ 9.26 Relocate air dryer 66.00$ -$ 9.27 Extended life anti-freeze 1 20.00$ 20.00$ 9.28 Starter motor options -$ 9.29 Starter motor options - Delco 39MT-MXT 1 STD 9.30 Mitsubishi electric 105P planetary gear reduction 46.00$ -$ 9.31 Relocate fuel filter 38.00$ -$ 9.32 Non-heated fuel/water separator, Racor 1000 FH 349.00$ -$ 9.33 Silicone radiator & heater hose with gate valve on each heater hose 201.00$ -$ 9.34 Silicone radiator, spring clamps on radiator & heater, 1/4 turn ball valve heater hose 212.00$ -$ 9.35 Mack brand EPDM radiator & heater hoses with 1/4 turn ball valve 79.00$ -$ 9.36 Mack brand EPDM radiator & heater hoses with constant torque clamps on all coolant lines 22.00$ -$ 9.37 Leece-Neville Alternator, 200 AMP 464.00$ -$ 9.38 Leece-Neville Alternator, 270 AMP 659.00$ -$ 9.39 Leece-Neville Alternator, 160 AMP Brushless 106.00$ -$ 9.40 Delco 24 SI Alternator, 160 AMP 54.00$ -$ 9.41 Delco 36SI Alternator, 165A Amp Brushless 1 178.00$ 178.00$ 9.42 Delco 36SI Alternator, 165A Amp Brushless, w/remote voltage sensing 166.00$ -$ 9.43 Leece-Neville Alternator, 140 Amp 49.00$ -$ 9.44 Leece-Neville Alternator, 160 AMP Brush 103.00$ -$ 9.45 Meritor/Wabco 636 (37.4 CFM) air compressor 783.00$ -$ 9.46 Without bug screen (22.00)$ -$ 9.47 Winterfront over radiator mtg bug screen 97.00$ -$ 9.48 Winter front cover only 52.00$ -$ 9.49 Corrosion resistant oil pan - Recommended for snow plow trucks 1 126.00$ 126.00$ 9.50 Stainless steel oil pan 1,950.00$ -$ 9.51 Davco 382 heated fuel-water separator 1 387.00$ 387.00$ 9.52 Racor fuel filter 1000 FH, 12V electrical heater with Mack integral fuel- water separator 374.00$ -$ 9.53 120V, 1500W block heater with 150W oil pan heater wired to same receptacle 137.00$ -$ 9.54 Electric preheater 1 53.00$ 53.00$ 9.55 Tether device -furnish cap retainer for oil fill, radiator overflow tank, battery box & tool box when furnish 23.00$ -$ 9.56 Electric primer pump (Mack engine) with momentary switch located LH rail BOC 96.00$ -$ 9.57 Rear engine PTO (Repto)1,817.00$ -$ 9.58 Furnish transmission thru shaft for local installation of RMPTO for Fuller transmission (lower left)28.00$ -$ 9.59 Provision for local installation of rear mounted PTO (lower center) includes dash mounted indicator light 159.00$ -$ 9.60 Air operated PTO control - includes in cab control (RMPTO only)118.00$ -$ 9.61 PTO switch and light with wiring and piping 1 156.00$ 156.00$ 9.62 PTO switch and light with wiring and piping - M-Drive transmission 156.00$ -$ 9.999 1 TRANSMISSION OPTIONS:1 10.1 2 plate 14" ceramic clutch option for manual transmission -$ 10.2 2 plate 15½" ceramic clutch option for manual transmission -$ -$ 10.3 External grease fitting for throw out bearing 7.00$ -$ 10.4 Adjustment free option for 2 plate clutches 47.00$ -$ 10.5 Synthetic (TranSynd) lubrication for Automatic Transmission 1 301.00$ 301.00$ 10.6 Synthetic lubrication for manual transmission STD 10.7 Factory option lube - transmission (56.00)$ -$ 10.8 Allison 3000-RDS 5/6 speed push button, PTO 178.00$ -$ 10.9 Allison 3000-RDS 5/6 speed push button, PTO, w/output retarder 2,278.00$ -$ 10.10 Allison 3000-EVS 6 speed push button, PTO 2,108.00$ -$ 10.11 Allison 4000-RDS 5 speed push button, PTO 14,280.00$ -$ 10.12 Allison 4000-RDS 5/6 speed push button, PTO 13,776.00$ -$ 10.13 Allison 4000-RDS 6 speed push button, PTO, w/output retarder 13,536.00$ -$ 10.14 Allison 4000-EVS 6 speed push button, PTO 14,972.00$ -$ 10.15 Allison 4500-RDS 6 speed push button, PTO 1 13,776.00$ 13,776.00$ 10.16 Allison 4500-RDS-R 6 speed, with retarder, push button, PTO 16,776.00$ -$ 10.17 Allison 4500-EVS 6 speed push button, PTO 14,972.00$ -$ 10.18 Mack TMD12AFD-HD automated 12 speed transmission (direct drive)3,718.00$ -$ 10.19 Mack TMD12AFD-HD automated 12 speed transmission (over drive)3,718.00$ -$ 10.20 Mack TMD13AFD-HD automated 13 speed. Transmission, creeper/multi- speed reverse (direct drive)7,438.00$ -$ 10.21 Mack TMD13AFD-HD automated 13 speed. Transmission, creeper/multi- speed reverse (over drive)7,438.00$ -$ 10.22 Mack TMD13AFD-HD automated 14 speed. Transmission, ultra-low creeper/multi-speed reverse (over drive)7,839.00$ -$ 10.29 Fuller FRO-14210C, 10 speed manual transmission, PTO STD 10.30 Fuller RTO-14908LL, 10 speed manual transmission, PTO 855.00$ -$ 10.31 Fuller FRO-15210C, 10 speed manual transmission, PTO 1,639.00$ -$ 10.32 Fuller FRO-16210C, 10 speed manual transmission, PTO 1,298.00$ -$ 10.33 Fuller RTO-16908LL, 10 speed manual transmission, PTO 1,585.00$ -$ 10.34 Fuller FRO-18210C, 10 speed manual transmission, PTO 1,614.00$ -$ 10.35 Fuller RTO-14909ALL, 11 speed manual transmission, PTO 1,390.00$ -$ 10.36 Fuller RTO-16908ALL, 11 speed manual transmission, PTO 2,102.00$ -$ 10.39 Fuller RTLO-16913A, 13 speed manual transmission, PTO 2,111.00$ -$ 10.40 Fuller RTLO-18913A, 13 speed manual transmission, PTO 2,848.00$ -$ 10.41 Fuller RTO-16915, 15 speed manual transmission, PTO 2,220.00$ -$ 10.42 Mack T318LR21, 18 speed manual transmission, PTO 1,561.00$ -$ 10.43 Mack T318LR, 18 speed manual transmission, PTO 1,277.00$ -$ 10.44 Mack T318, 18 speed manual transmission, PTO 1,306.00$ -$ 10.45 Fuller RTLO-16918B, 18 speed manual transmission, PTO 2,725.00$ -$ 10.46 Fuller RTLO-18918B, 18 speed manual transmission, PTO 3,407.00$ -$ 10.47 Air assist clutch 359.00$ -$ 10.48 Mechanical clutch cable 160.00$ -$ 10.49 Open grated clutch pedal 14.00$ -$ 10.50 Transmission oil cooler 1 STD 10.51 Driveshaft guard for center bearing 27.00$ -$ 10.52 Transmission dust proofing 15.00$ -$ 10.53 T-Handle shift lever for Allison - Floor mounted 203.00$ -$ 10.54 Allison shift to neutral when park brake engaged 1 STD 10.55 3rd or 4th gear hold for Allison transmission 300.00$ -$ 10.56 Stainless steel transmission coolant pipes 1 175.00$ 175.00$ 10.57 Allison fill tune and dip stick under hood 138.00$ -$ 10.58 Remote lube fittings: clutch release, brg & both cross-shaft; mounted under LH door 50.00$ -$ 10.59 GP1-23 Parker gear pump - requires M-Drive transmission and RMPO 425.00$ -$ 10.60 GP1-41 Parker gear pump - requires M-Drive transmission and RMPO 434.00$ -$ 10.61 GP1-60 Parker gear pump - requires M-Drive transmission and RMPO 548.00$ -$ 10.62 GP1-80 Parker gear pump - requires M-Drive transmission and RMPO 588.00$ -$ 10.63 F1-61R Parker gear pump - requires M-Drive transmission and RMPO 637.00$ -$ 10.64 F1-81R Parker gear pump - requires M-Drive transmission and RMPO 710.00$ -$ 10.65 F1-101R Parker gear pump - requires M-Drive transmission and RMPO 857.00$ -$ 10.999 1 11.0 ELECTRICAL OPTIONS:1 11.1 Resettable circuit breaker electrical protection -$ 11.2 Automatic reset circuit breakers -$ 11.3 Solid state circuit protection -$ 11.4 Circuit box under hood or end of frame, each -$ 11.5 Battery disconnect off negative side 1 97.00$ 97.00$ 11.6 Remote jump start terminals 111.00$ -$ 11.7 Back up alarm (Preco Factory Model)-$ 11.8 OEM daytime running lights 1 STD 11.9 3000 CCA batteries in lieu of 1950CCA 1 66.00$ 66.00$ 11.10 3 each 650/1950 CCA batteries in lieu of 2 each batteries STD 11.11 Battery box aft of cab -$ 11.12 Grote 44710 flasher -$ 11.13 Signal Stat 935 turn signal per Spec 12.6 -$ 11.14 Auxiliary customer access circuits -$ 11.15 Switch for snowplow lights mounted on instrumental panel. Includes wiring terminated near headlights, for customer mounted auxiliary snowplow lights.80.00$ -$ 11.16 Power source terminal-2 stud type-mounted on firewall or inside cab with ground to frame rail and to starter, with 6 gauge wire.-$ 11.17 10-position switch panel mounted on instrument panel. Includes 10 lighted switches, ignition control; switches will control relays which will feed stud type junction block mounted inside cab.-$ 11.18 Vehicle speed sensor with speed signal at fuse panel for sander ground speed control system.20.00$ -$ 11.19 Battery box left hand rail back of fuel tank 1 48.00$ 48.00$ 11.20 Battery terminal cable with tall battery terminal nuts 8.00$ -$ 11.21 Dash mounted indicator body/hoist up body builder lamp 71.00$ -$ 11.22 RH/LH led work light on both side of truck 1 113.00$ 113.00$ 11.23 Polished aluminum battery box cover 1 52.00$ 52.00$ 11.24 Molded plastic with splash guard 29.00$ -$ 11.25 Painted steel battery box 23.00$ -$ 11.26 Lockable steel battery box 69.00$ -$ 11.27 Battery shock pad 4.00$ -$ 11.28 Body Link w/cab floor pass thru hole/rubber boot 1 200.00$ 200.00$ 11.29 Body Link w/o cab floor pass thru hole/rubber boot STD 11.30 2 Extra dash mounted illuminated toggle switches 1 16.00$ 16.00$ 11.31 One extra dash mounted rocker switch thru battery for local installed items 10.00$ -$ 11.32 One extra dash mounted rocker switch thru ignition for local installed items 10.00$ -$ 11.33 Six extra switches 2-15A ignition, 1-20A ignition, 1-10A ignition, 1- 5A battery, & 1-20A battery 111.00$ -$ 11.34 Eight switches - front strobe, rear strobes, wing light, wing strobe, sander light, tail gate lock, and vibrator 237.00$ -$ 11.35 Back up alarm with intermittent feature (Ambient noise sensitive)98.00$ -$ 11.36 Ecco back-up alarm 575 constant sound level 74.00$ -$ 11.37 Ecco back-up alarm SA917 ambient noise sensitive 98.00$ -$ 11.38 Pollak 41-722 constant audible (mounted on rear crossmember)80.00$ -$ 11.39 Fog lights 93.00$ -$ 11.40 Fog lights provisions - includes dash control & wiring for local installation of fog lights 13.00$ -$ 11.41 Omit rear tail lights (38.00)$ -$ 11.42 Incandescent tail light module 1 91.00$ 91.00$ 11.43 Brake lighting on with engine brake 84.00$ -$ 11.44 LED type tail lights 199.00$ -$ 11.45 Two Mack M/F 925/1850 CCA batteries 56.00$ -$ 11.46 Three Mack 730/2190 CCA batteries 5.00$ -$ 11.47 Three Mack 800 CCA AGM Long Life Batteries 263.00$ -$ 11.48 Four Mack 1000/4000 CCA 182.00$ -$ 11.49 Switch in dash with wiring to cab roof, above LH & RH doors for local installation of strobe lights 32.00$ -$ 11.50 LED strobe beacon lights mounted on top of cab with switch on D-panel 196.00$ -$ 11.51 LH roof mounted spot light 71.00$ -$ 11.52 Trucklite LED side marker light 102.00$ -$ 11.999 1 12.0 CAB EXTERIOR OPTIONS:1 12.1 Dual electric horns 6.00$ -$ 12.2 Air horns, dual, round, with snow shields 95.00$ -$ 12.3 Dual rectangular air horns 1 72.00$ 72.00$ 12.4 Fender mirrors per Spec 12.4 133.00$ -$ 12.5 Heated mirrors per Spec 12.5 -West Coast 104.00$ -$ 12.6 Remote control for R.H. mirror & heated -Bulldog stylized mirrors 378.00$ -$ 12.7 Remote control for dual mirrors & heated - Bulldog stylized mirrors with integral convex mirror 1 474.00$ 474.00$ 12.8 Upcharge for cab extension or larger cab -$ 12.9 Severe duty aluminum cab option -$ 12.10 Dupont Highway orange paint or equal 31.00$ -$ 12.11 Premium paint color option 233.00$ -$ 12.12 Imron paint option 1 STD 12.13 Imron and clear coat paint option 1 STD 12.14 Top of hood painted flat black 607.00$ -$ 12.15 Cab Air Ride Suspension 1 STD 12.16 Tilting hood per Spec 12.8 1 STD 12.17 Butterfly option on hood 1 413.00$ 413.00$ 12.18 Transverse hood opening w/setback axle -$ 12.19 Front fender mounted turn signals -$ 12.20 Cab visor, external, painted to match cab color 1 184.00$ 184.00$ 12.21 Front fender extensions 1 105.00$ 105.00$ 12.22 Front fender mud flaps 1 STD 12.23 Arctic winter wiper blades 19.00$ -$ 12.24 Optional windshield washer tank 26.00$ -$ 12.25 Per truck charge for all trucks, key identical 20.00$ -$ 12.26 RH observation prism window in door 28.00$ -$ 12.27 Spotlight LH, RH, or roof mounted each 71.00$ -$ 12.28 Front tow hooks 1 STD 12.29 Rear tow hooks 22.00$ -$ 12.30 Per truck charge for all trucks, key identical - 4 keys 39.00$ -$ 12.31 Heated mirrors per Spec 12.5 -West Coast heated & illuminated 123.00$ -$ 12.32 Heated mirrors per Spec 12.5 -Bulldog Stylized mirrors w/integral convex mirrors 272.00$ -$ 12.33 Heated mirrors per Spec 12.5 -Body color aero mirror with integrated convex mirror (49.00)$ -$ 12.34 Remote control for R.H. mirror & heated -Aerodynamic 344.00$ -$ 12.35 Hadley/Kam 4-way mirrors with chrome steel - RH motorized & heated 214.00$ -$ 12.36 Remote control for dual mirrors & heated - Bulldog stylized mirrors illuminated with integral convex mirror 502.00$ -$ 12.37 Remote control for dual mirrors & heated - Aerodynamic 444.00$ -$ 12.38 Remote control for dual mirrors & heated - Aerodynamic body color 134.00$ -$ 12.39 Hadley/Kam 4-way mirrors with chrome steel - RH/LH both motorized & heated 252.00$ -$ 12.40 RH observation prism window in door 28.00$ -$ 12.41 Heated electric wiper blades 118.00$ -$ 12.42 Heated windshield 1 425.00$ 425.00$ 12.43 One piece windshield 1 83.00$ 83.00$ 12.44 Tinted windshield and sides w/50% transmittance gray, tinted rear window 50.00$ -$ 12.45 Bright finish hood intake 1 16.00$ 16.00$ 12.46 Bright finish bars with surround grille 1 240.00$ 240.00$ 12.47 Bright finish grille 32.00$ -$ 12.48 Bullet type chrome marker & clearance lights 1 75.00$ 75.00$ 12.49 Led type marker & clearance lights 1 75.00$ 75.00$ 12.50 RH tool box mounted on frame rail 221.00$ -$ 12.51 Heated convex mirrors 34.00$ -$ 12.52 Electronic keyless entry 130.00$ -$ 12.53 Bright finish RH fender mirror 67.00$ -$ 12.54 Bus style 1/4 round black finish fender mirrors 191.00$ -$ 12.55 Stainless steel exterior sun visor 247.00$ -$ 12.56 Bright Finish hood latches 89.00$ -$ 12.57 10" round bright finish heated fender mirrors 234.00$ -$ 12.58 Rect convex mirror above RH driver door window 23.00$ -$ 13.0 CAB INTERIOR OPTIONS:1 13.1 Medium grade interior trim package -$ 13.2 Sandstone Color with woodgrain instrument panel 292.00$ -$ 13.3 Sandstone Color with brushed metallic instrument panel 292.00$ -$ 13.4 Slate Gray Color with woodgrain instrument panel 292.00$ -$ 13.5 Slate Gray Color with brushed metallic instrument panel 292.00$ -$ 13.6 Premium grade interior trim package includes power window and locks in package -$ 13.7 Sandstone Color with woodgrain instrument panel 1,087.00$ -$ 13.8 Sandstone Color with brushed metallic instrument panel 1,087.00$ -$ 13.9 Slate Gray Color with woodgrain instrument panel 1,087.00$ -$ 13.10 Slate Gray Color with brushed metallic instrument panel 1 1,087.00$ 1,087.00$ 13.11 Round universal gauge package 1 STD 13.12 Power window, passenger side 158.00$ -$ 13.13 Power window/both passenger and driver window 325.00$ -$ 13.14 O.E.M factory installed, AM/FM Premium stereo, CD-Player, Weatherboard, Handfree interface, Bluetooth 1 STD 13.15 O.E.M factory installed, AM/FM Premium stereo, CD-Player, Weatherband, Handfree interface, Bluetooth, Sirius/XM Satellite 157.00$ -$ 13.16 Radio accommodation package includes antenna, power supply and two speakers (No radio)(175.00)$ -$ 13.17 O.E.M factory installed, AM/FM stereo, MP3, Weatherband, Handfree interface, Bluetooth (45.00)$ -$ 13.18 O.E.M factory installed, air conditioning 1 STD 13.19 Cab mounted non-resettable hour meter -$ 13.20 Dash mounted air cleaner air restriction gauge - (Display in Co-Pilot only)1 STD 13.21 Transmission temp gauges 1 STD 13.22 Windshield defroster fan w/switch dash mounted 87.00$ -$ 13.23 Between seats mounted console 308.00$ -$ 13.24 Transmission oil sensor (check & fill)1 STD 13.25 CB hot jacks dash mounted 13.00$ -$ 13.26 Tilt & telescope steering wheel 1 STD 13.27 Tilt steering wheel -$ 13.28 Self canceling turn signals 1 STD 13.29 Bostrom Talladega 915 Hi-Back air driver seat 26.00$ -$ 13.30 Bostrom Talladega 915 wide ride Hi-Back air driver with 4 chamber air lumbar 181.00$ -$ 13.31 Bostrom Talladega 915 Hi-Back air driver seat and air lumbar support 137.00$ -$ 13.32 Air-Sears Atlas 70 hi-back driver seat 246.00$ -$ 13.33 Air-Sears Atlas 70 hi-back driver seat "Premium comfort with height adj. Air lumbar 301.00$ -$ 13.34 Air-Sears Atlas 80 hi-back driver seat 4 chamber air lumbar 374.00$ -$ 13.35 National 2000 hi-back air driver seat - single chamber air lumbar, 2 position front cushion adjustable 1 104.00$ 104.00$ 13.36 National 2000 hi-back air driver seat - three chamber air lumbar, 2 position front cushion adjustable front cushion with adjustable rear cushion 199.00$ -$ 13.37 Mack fixed rider seat mid-back with integral storage compartment 82.00$ -$ 13.38 Mack fixed rider seat hi-back with integral storage compartment 106.00$ -$ 13.39 Extended non suspension rider seat with seat belts (2)101.00$ -$ 13.40 Mack fixed hi-back rider seat 44.00$ -$ 13.41 Bostrom Talladega 900R mid-back non suspension rider seat 74.00$ -$ 13.42 Bostrom Talladega 900R hi-back non suspension rider seat 95.00$ -$ 13.43 Bostrom Talladega 915 mid back air rider seat 200.00$ -$ 13.44 Bostrom Talladega 915 hi-back air rider seat 297.00$ -$ 13.45 Bostrom Talladega 915 hi-back air rider seat with air lumbar 297.00$ -$ 13.46 National 2000 mid-back air rider seat 214.00$ -$ 13.47 National 2000 hi-back air rider seat 1 250.00$ 250.00$ 13.48 Omit rider seat (40.00)$ -$ 13.49 Inboard mounted driver arm rest 1 19.00$ 19.00$ 13.50 Inboard mounted rider arm rest - Air Ride Seat Only -$ -$ 13.51 Cloth with vinyl driver & rider seat 1 -$ -$ 13.52 Driver seat dust cover 1 -$ -$ 13.53 Passenger seat dust cover - Not Available with fix passenger seat 1 -$ -$ 13.54 All ultra leather drive and ride set 95.00$ -$ 13.55 Orange driver & rider seat belt 1 76.00$ 76.00$ 13.56 Light & buzzer for seat belt 35.00$ -$ 13.57 Push button type starter 13.00$ -$ 13.58 Diagonal grab handle on inside of driver door 1 35.00$ 35.00$ 13.59 Co-pilot driver display (enhanced 4.5" diagonal graphic LCD display w/4- button stalk control - includes guard dog routine maintenance monitoring 1 STD 13.60 Roadwatch ambient air temp gauge for outside and road temps - requires aero-dynamic mirrors 648.00$ -$ 13.61 Roadwatch ambient air temp gauge for outside and road temps without display - includes cable to D panel with 6" extra wire 967.00$ -$ 13.62 Roadwatch ambient air temp gauge for outside and road temps with display on dash panel 1,081.00$ -$ 13.63 5lb fire extinguisher between LH seat base and door with valve aimed rearward 1 66.00$ 66.00$ 13.64 Reflector kit parallel to inside of rider base seat 1 27.00$ 27.00$ 13.65 Air conditioning blend air HVAC with ATC temp regulation 81.00$ -$ 13.66 Air conditioning blend air HVAC with ATC temp regulation & APADS 226.00$ -$ 13.67 Air conditioning with air conditioning protection & diagnostic system (APADS)132.00$ -$ 13.68 Cab cleanout - includes in cab pneumatic line 1 46.00$ 46.00$ 13.69 40 Channel CB Radio, 10 channel weather 205.00$ -$ 13.70 48" Radio antenna right side mirror mounted 4.00$ -$ 13.71 48"CB Antenna left side mirror mounted 38.00$ -$ 13.72 CB hot jacks mounted on the dash and in header console 17.00$ -$ 13.73 CB mounting in console & external speakers 107.00$ -$ 13.74 Auto shutoff for radio when truck is in reverse 1 47.00$ 47.00$ 13.75 Exhaust pyrometer & transmission oil temperature gauges 1 STD 13.76 Exhaust pyrometer, transmission oil temperature, manifold pressure and air application gauges 1 75.00$ 75.00$ 13.77 Exhaust pyrometer, transmission oil temperature, manifold pressure and air application gauges, Air Suspension 100.00$ -$ 13.78 Rear Axle temperature gauge 1 91.00$ 91.00$ 13.79 Red floor lighting w/switch plus (4) door lamps w/switches 103.00$ -$ 13.80 Interior storage console mounted on floor between seats w/12 volt power outlet 308.00$ -$ 13.81 Bodybuilder interior console mounted to floor between seats 209.00$ -$ 13.999 1 14.0 MN/DOT OPTIONS: 14.10 Additional warranty coverage per spec 12.9 -$ 14.20 Engine Plan 1 60 months 250,000 miles 1,200.00$ -$ 14.30 Engine Plan 1 72 months 250,000 miles 2,200.00$ -$ 14.40 Engine Plan 1 84 months 250,000 miles 2,520.00$ -$ 14.50 Engine Plan 1 60 months 250,000 miles - HP over 460 horses 2,000.00$ -$ 14.60 Engine Plan 1 72 months 250,000 miles - HP over 460 horses 3,300.00$ -$ 14.70 Engine Plan 1 84 months 250,000 miles - HP over 460 horses 3,800.00$ -$ 14.80 Engine Plan 2 60 months 250,000 miles 1,900.00$ -$ 14.90 Engine Plan 2 72 months 250,000 miles 3,800.00$ -$ 14.10 Engine Plan 2 84 months 250,000 miles 4,300.00$ -$ 14.11 Engine Plan 2 60 months 250,000 miles - HP over 460 horses 2,950.00$ -$ 14.12 Engine Plan 2 72 months 250,000 miles - HP over 460 horses 5,675.00$ -$ 14.13 Engine Plan 2 84 months 250,000 miles - HP over 460 horses 6,450.00$ -$ 14.14 Engine after-treatment systems (EATS) 60 months 250,000 miles 675.00$ -$ 14.15 Engine after-treatment systems (EATS) 72 months 250,000 miles 825.00$ -$ 14.16 Engine after-treatment systems (EATS) 84 months 250,000 miles 950.00$ -$ 14.17 M-Drive Transmission 48 months 500,000 miles 971.00$ -$ 14.18 M-Drive Transmission 60 months 500,000 miles 2,067.00$ -$ 14.19 M-Drive HD Transmission 48 months 250,000 miles 775.00$ -$ 14.20 M-Drive HD Transmission 60 months 250,000 miles 1,150.00$ -$ 14.21 M-Drive Clutch 48 months 250,000 395.00$ -$ 14.22 M-Drive Clutch 60 months 250,000 695.00$ -$ 14.23 HVAC (Air Conditioning) 60 months 600.00$ -$ 14.24 Starter 60 months 300,000 miles 203.00$ -$ 14.25 Alternator 60 months 300,000 miles 231.00$ -$ 14.26 Starter & Alternator 60 months 300,000 miles 315.00$ -$ 14.27 Prebuild specification meeting (per person) to be held in St. Paul/Minneapolis area. 1.00$ -$ 14.28 Pilot inspection meeting (per person). 900.00$ -$ 14.9 1 15.0 TRAILER TOW OPTIONS:1 15.1 Trailer tow package extended to rear of frame 317.00$ -$ 15.2 Trailer package extend to rear of frame per Spec 12.12 417.00$ -$ 15.3 Single 7 pin SAE type, end of frame 117.00$ -$ 15.4 Dual 7 pins standard SAE type, end of frame (1) for trailer with electric brakes, (1) for trailer with air brakes 158.00$ -$ 15.5 Hand control valve for trailer brakes 47.00$ -$ 15.9 1 16.0 MANUALS / TRADE-IN INTEREST FEE:1 16.1 Percent interest per month (non-compounding) on unpaid cab & chassis balance. Applies only to CPV Members. (Payable after trade-in is delivered to vendor). Percentage/per month. 1.50$ -$ 16.3 Manuals in CD form, parts repair and service, per set 500.00$ -$ 16.4 Premium Tech Tool 3,800.00$ -$ 16.9 1 17.0 Delivery Charges:1 Price per loaded mile Starting Point 17.1 Roseville, MN 55113 2.00$ -$ 17.9 1 18.0 Maintenance/ Body Shop Labor rates 1 18.1 Rate for Initial Inspection/Diagnostoce 167.00$ -$ 18.2 Rate for Mechanical Work 167.00$ -$ 18.3 Rate for Body Work 167.00$ -$ 18.9 1 19.0 Quantity Discounts:1 Enter the number of units that must be purchased and the corresponding discount offered to the purchaser. More than one quantity discount may be entered. 20 Next Model Year Upcharges 1 Enter the following Production Model Year here >>>>>>>>>2023 20.1 Percentage Upcharge for the following Model Year Base Unit 1 1.50%1,389.38$ 20.2 Percentage Upcharge for the following Model Year Options 1 1.50%567.09$ 20.0 1 Total Cost:132,387.47$ CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY December 7, 2021 ________________________________ Shep Harris, Mayor _______________________________ Timothy J Cruikshank City Manager Golden Valley City Council Meeting December 7, 2021 Agenda Item 3. C. 3. Authorization to Sign Funding Agreement with the City of Orono for the Toward Zero Deaths (TZD) Program, Resolution No. 21-99 Prepared By Scott Nadeau, Chief of Police Summary The Police Department partners with sixteen (16) other agencies, and the City of Orono being the fiscal agent in receiving funds for a Toward Zero Death (TZD) grant. The TZD grant funding is a traffic enforcement grant focusing on suspected impaired drivers, speeding and distracted driving. Golden Valley Police Officers participating in this program are subject to Golden Valley Police Department Policies including the agencies Traffic Enforcement, Stops and Searches policy. • In Minnesota, approximately 23,000 people are arrested each year (62 per day) for DWI related offenses. • In the calendar year 2021, traffic related deaths are up twenty-three (23) percent, and on pace to be the deadliest year in Minnesota history. The largest contributing factor is speeding. • Comparing the calendar years of 2020 & 2021, there has been a thirty (30) percent increase in traffic related deaths specifically linked to speed. • Comparing the calendar years of 2019 & 2021 there is a one-hundred seventeen (117) percent increase in traffic related deaths linked to speed. • Driving Under the Influence of narcotics is up one-hundred six (106) percent over the last five (5) years, 2016 – 2020, 12,883 incidents. Compared to 6,269 incidents from the previous five (5) years 2011 – 2015. • The Golden Valley Police Department only participates in activities that focus on life safety violations such as, DWI, Speed and distracted driving. • The following information is only to provide context and not to sway the decision of the Council not to approve the funding information • We recognize their larger structures and issues that will influence the outcomes of the TZD grant. • We are participating in a number of other initiatives to hopefully lesson the impact for less disparate outcomes. Through the duration of the contract, which ends on September 30, 2022, Golden Valley will be reimbursed for conducting enforcement shifts focusing on impaired driving, speeding and distracted driving. City Council Regular Meeting Executive Summary City of Golden Valley December 7, 2021 2 Financial Or Budget Considerations The City of Golden Valley will be promptly reimbursed after an invoice is submitted to the fiscal agent. Recommended Action Motion to approve Resolution No. 21-99 accepting Toward Zero Deaths Enforcement Grant in the amount of $358,175.00 and authorizing the Mayor and City Manager to sign funding agreement with the City of Orono. Supporting Documents • Grant Contract Agreement (3 pages) • 2022 Enforcement Budget (1 page) • Minnesota Department of Public Safety, 2022 RFP (12 pages) • Grant Partner Agencies (1 page) • Weekly Traffic Fatality Update November 14, 2021 (4 pages) • Resolution No. 21-99 (1 page)                                        Orono Group Minneapolis Group Combined Total 99,000.00$ 144,000.00$ 243,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 22,400.00$ 42,400.00$ Speed Enforcement 13,000.00$ 15,000.00$ 28,000.00$ 1,000.00$ -$ 1,000.00$ Distracted Enforcement 8,325.00$ 13,800.00$ 22,125.00$ Pedestrian -$ 15,000.00$ 15,000.00$ 141,325.00$ 210,200.00$ 351,525.00$ 1,050.00$ 2,000.00$ 3,050.00$ 1,200.00$ 2,400.00$ 3,600.00$ Total Dispatch & Admin 1,050.00$ 2,000.00$ 6,650.00$ 358,175.00$ Total Grant Award Total Overtime Enforcement Funding Dispatch & Admin DWI: Orono Police Department - Fiscal Lead 2022 Enforcement Budget Dispatch & Admin Other: Impaired Driving Enforcement Seat Belt Enforcement Move Over Enforcement Page 1 Minnesota Department of Public Safety Enforcement Request for Proposal - Federal Fiscal Year 2022 The Minnesota Department of Public Safety (DPS), Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) is seeking proposals from law enforcement agencies to conduct a highly-visible, well-publicized traffic safety enforcement program. The grant funding will be used for overtime enforcement to address all traffic safety issues with an emphasis on impaired driving, occupant protection, speed and distracted driving. Table of Contents Overview Page 2 Eligibility Page 2 Participation in Enforcement Campaigns Page 2-3 General Funding Rules Page 4 Available Funding Page 4-5 Agency Match Page 6 Reporting and Invoicing Page 6 Training Requirements Page 7 Planning and Meetings Page 8 TZD Conference Page 8 Application Process Page 8-9 Termination of a Grant Page 9 Application Instructions Page 10-12 2022 Enforcement Program Changes Impaired Driving Funding Because funds are limited, the DPS-OTS is no longer funding the “Top 13” counties for sustained, year-long impaired driving enforcement. All grantees can participate in optional DWI enforcement during the summer month weekends through Labor Day. Pedestrian Enforcement Because funds are limited, only Hennepin and Ramsey Counties are eligible to apply for pedestrian enforcement. Speed Enforcement All agencies are eligible to apply for speed enforcement. Equipment Agencies can apply to purchase a radar, lidar or PBT with a 50 percent match. TZD Conference The TZD Conference will be a hybrid event held Oct. 13-14, 2021, in Rochester, Minnesota. This means that the conference will be held in person at the Mayo Civic Center and general sessions and select concurrent sessions will be available for live virtual viewing. Hotel Reimbursement and Registration Fee Because federal funding continues to be limited, the DPS-OTS will not reimburse grantees for the cost of hotel rooms at the conference. The DPS-OTS will continue to pay the $125 in-person TZD Conference registration fee, or the $75 virtual conference fee. Page 2 Overview The DPS-OTS has a mandate to promote the safety of those who use public roadways. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) provides federal funding to the DPS-OTS to design and implement public education and traffic law enforcement programs to fulfill this mandate. The DPS-OTS and NHTSA seek to support traffic safety interventions that have been proven to reduce deaths and severe injuries caused by motor vehicle crashes. Research has consistently shown enforcement efforts alone do not have a lasting effect on driver behavior if the majority of the public is not aware of them. Combining increased enforcement with public awareness has been found to result in long-lasting improvements in driver behavior. By increasing the number of arrests and raising the perceived risk of arrest, compliance with laws is increased. NHTSA requires the DPS-OTS to develop performance measures in key traffic safety behavior areas and report yearly on progress toward achieving our goals. These performance standards measure the level of Minnesota’s success in moving the bar Toward Zero Deaths. As part of the application for the 2022 Enforcement grant, DPS-OTS requires law enforcement to create local performance measures that support the state’s traffic safety goals. The statewide goals are fewer than 225 fatalities and 980 serious injuries by 2025. Eligibility Eligible applicants for this RFP are Minnesota cities, counties, Universities and Native American Tribes for their law enforcement agencies and the Minnesota State Patrol (MSP). Private companies and organizations are not eligible. County Population, VMT and Behavioral Measures from 2015-2019 crash data will be used to identify counties with the greatest need for FFY22 Enforcement grant funds. For greater impact in reducing traffic-related serious injuries and deaths, applications from counties with traffic deaths and serious injury yearly averages that are at or above 2015-2019 state averages will be given additional consideration. Multiple counties, as well as a county and multiple cities within that county, may partner to apply for one grant. The DPS-OTS will issue a maximum of one enforcement grant per county with the exception of Hennepin and St. Louis Counties; five grants are allowed for Hennepin County and two for St. Louis County. Each applicant must partner with at least one agency. No single agency applications will be accepted, unless a partner agency is not an option. Participation in Enforcement Campaigns Applicants are encouraged to participate in all enforcement campaigns, however, participation is required in only the National campaigns. (December and Labor Day Drive Sober or Get Pulled Over, and May Click it or Ticket) However, if you apply for the funding and receive it, you are required to participate. See the 2022 Enforcement Calendar for specific dates. Short reports are required to be completed by all agencies even if you elect not to participate in all grant-funded campaigns. Short reports include both on-duty and grant-funded activity. Campaigns are focused enforcement activity, such as seat belt enforcement that is scheduled during a specific time period defined on the Enforcement Calendar. These campaigns include earned media before and/or after each enforcement time period. Combining increased enforcement with public awareness has been found to result in long- lasting improvements in driver behavior. Paid media advertisements will focus on key messages about impaired driving, occupant protection, speed and distraction during the campaigns. High Visibility Enforcement The DPS-OTS requires all multiple-jurisdiction grants to be high-visibility enforcement. High-visibility enforcement is strongly encouraged to single-agency grants by working with on-duty squads and the Minnesota State Patrol. Individual agency grants will be evaluated based on data analysis from County Specific Fact Sheets on a case-by-case basis. Traffic enforcement makes a bigger and more memorable impact on the public when they see more than one squad on a single roadway in close proximity. For DPS-OTS purposes, high-visibility enforcement is defined as more than one squad in relatively close proximity on a single roadway; for jurisdictions with higher populations and number of officers, DPS-OTS Page 3 expects more than three squads to make up high-visibility enforcement. The fewer vehicles used, the shorter the roadway segment should be. The DPS-OTS encourages coordination and scheduling events with the Minnesota State Patrol in each jurisdiction and encourages grantees to wear their department-issued traffic vests for safety. Education and Community Outreach High-visibility enforcement, media relations, and community education are key factors in the success of the program. It is important to have a plan for public information and media activities to ensure the plan is executed. Roadway signs, coasters, posters and electronic message boards are some of the ways to increase the awareness of the enforcement campaign. Collateral materials are available on the DPS-OTS Website under Law Enforcement Partners. If there is an active Safe Roads or Safe Communities coalition in your grant’s jurisdiction, the DPS-OTS encourages law enforcement to participate in coalition activities and meetings, however, time to attend meetings and activities cannot be reimbursed through the Enforcement grant. Real-Time Officer Activity Reporting (ROAR) Enforcement events are required to be entered into ROAR according to the dates indicated on the Enforcement Calendar. Agency-funded shifts during the campaign can be used as enforcement match, however, ROAR should not be used for agency only funded events. Impaired driving and seat belt events are the only events that can be scheduled outside the Enforcement Calendar unless approved by your DPS-OTS grant coordinator. 15-Minute Rule - If an officer backs up a law enforcement partner during a call for service, which exceeds 15 minutes, the officer must close their ROAR log. A new log must be created when the officer returns to their shift. Enforcement activity not related to traffic safety is an unallowable expense. DWI eCharging The DPS-OTS requires that ALL impaired driving arrests (grant funded and regular duty shifts) are processed using the eCharging system. Benefits to using eCharging: • Law enforcement – helps to quickly and accurately complete forms required for a DWI arrest. • Prosecutors – provides for accurate charging information that leads to successful prosecution of DWI cases. • Driver and Vehicle Services – automatically revokes an offender’s driving privileges within 24 hours of publishing the DWI information. • Office of Traffic Safety – provides DWI arrest data that helps with problem identification and media outreach. • Traffic Safety – provides swift certain sanctions, which is known to change behavior. If you have questions regarding the system or would like to schedule training, contact Mike Asleson, DWI eCharging Deployment Manager at the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension at, (651) 793-2448; or mike.asleson@state.mn.us. Length of Shifts: Recommended length of scheduled shifts: Seat belt = 4-6 hours Speed, distracted and move over shifts = 6-8 hours DWI shifts = 8-10 hours This grant program will follow the DPS policy for its law enforcement agencies. The maximum length of shifts should be no more than 14 hours without at least a six-hour rest period. The 14-hour restriction exists to minimize risk and liability to law enforcement officers and their agencies. Page 4 General Funding Rules The grant will begin Oct. 1, 2021, and end Sept. 30, 2022. Grant funds are to be used for enhanced enforcement and must ultimately increase an agency’s overall budget. The grant funds are available on a reimbursement basis. As a result, applicant agencies must have “start-up” funds. The fiscal agency will submit a single invoice for all law enforcement agencies participating and reimburse partner agencies after receiving payment from the DPS-OTS. Reimbursement of Funds - The majority of funds (at least 92 percent) must be used for overtime enforcement hours. Grant funding cannot be used to fund enforcement and dispatch activity that is regularly scheduled work; it must be used for additional costs to the department due to the enhanced patrolling efforts. • Comp time - Since there is no way of knowing when the officer will use comp time, it is not allowed for grant- funded shifts. Reimbursement for grant activities must be paid during the current federal fiscal year. • Part-time officers – Straight time, rather than overtime will be paid depending on the bargaining unit or contractual requirements. • Holiday Pay - When an officer works on a holiday and contractually receives double time and a half for each hour worked, DPS-OTS will reimburse time and a half with the remaining charges being reimbursed by the agency. Agencies cannot create special rates for working grant-funded shifts; reimbursements will be based on the officer’s regular rate of pay or overtime as applicable. • Vacation time - if an officer is being paid vacation time or other leave pay (paid for by their agency), they are not eligible to work federally-funded grant shifts. Available Funding Impaired Driving Because funds are limited, the DPS-OTS is no longer funding the “Top 13” counties for additional impaired driving enforcement. In addition to the December holiday and Labor Day campaigns, all grantees can participate in optional DWI enforcement on weekends (Thursday - Sunday) beginning May 12 through Labor Day. Agencies also can use a portion of their impaired driving enforcement budget to schedule events during celebrations that have a history of increased alcohol consumption. These events can be specific to a community, or specific days such as St. Patrick’s Day, Super Bowl, Halloween or other significant event. For example, if a city has a festival that has a history of increased impaired drivers, other city or county agencies in the grant can work that event for enhanced enforcement. Before scheduling the event, review the County Specific Fact Sheets and schedule according to higher than average fatal and serious injury crash rates. Speed All agencies are eligible to apply for speed funding. Agencies should use County Data to determine best location and time for enforcement. Occupant Protection According to 2015-2019 Minnesota Seat Belt Facts, of the 1,294 vehicle occupants killed, only 667 (52 percent) were known to be belted; and during this period, 230 motorists were killed during nighttime hours (9 p.m. – 3 a.m.), and only 89 (39 percent) of these victims were known to be belted. To enhance nighttime enforcement, grantees should schedule 50 percent of the enforcement after 1600 hours during the May campaign. Because Minnesota crash data supports the need for additional seat belt enforcement, seat belt details can be scheduled any time during the grant year if funding is available and the grantee has scheduled a minimum of 80 percent of the seat belt shifts during May and September campaigns. The additional seat belt details must not be scheduled during calendar-specific campaigns (impaired, distracted, speed or Move Over). Grantees using the additional 20 percent should review the County Specific Fact Sheets and schedule events during higher than average fatal and serious injury crash rates. The DPS-OTS encourages agencies to partner with local and regional groups for corridor enforcement. Page 5 Additional seat belt enforcement efforts must follow the same high-visibility requirements and coordinated with the Minnesota State Patrol to create general deterrence and ultimately change driver behavior. Because paid media and statewide media relations activity for occupant protection will only occur during the May and September Click it or Ticket campaign, grantees electing to schedule additional seat belt enforcement campaigns must implement an education plan outlined in the application (i.e., social media, news release, local electronic message boards, etc.) to compliment the enforcement. Because all enforcement activity is captured in ROAR, the DPS-OTS coordinator will review the extra seat belt efforts in the quarterly report. Pedestrian According to 2015-2019 crash facts, pedestrian deaths made up 12 percent of the overall fatalities. The contributing factors are matched at approximately 50 percent being attributed to the motorist and 50 percent being attributed to the pedestrian. To help combat pedestrian fatalities, only the counties with the top two worst ranked counties for pedestrian fatalities and serious injuries (2015-2019) are eligible for additional funding for high-visibility enforcement with a focus on pedestrian and motorist behavior. Because funds are limited, Hennepin and Ramsey County are the only eligible counties to apply for funding. Equipment Equipment requested to be purchased with grant funding must be used to support traffic safety enforcement and authorized by the OTS. All equipment must be pre-approved by your DPS-OTS grant coordinator prior to the purchase. Equipment covered by the grant include a radar unit, lidar or PBT. Grantees can request a lidar or radar unit; or up to three PBTs. Only one lidar, radar or up to 3 PBTs will be awarded per grant. A 50 percent match from the agency is required to purchase equipment to show a vested interest in traffic safety. For example, if a radar unit costs $3,500.00, the DPS-OTS would reimburse 50 percent of the total cost, which is $1,750.00. Any piece of equipment that costs more than $5,000 (including taxes, shipping, and installation) must be approved in writing by the NHTSA before it is ordered; contact the DPS-OTS coordinator to request that approval. The grantee may not dispose of any equipment unless permission has been approved by the DPS-OTS grant coordinator. The grantee shall be responsible for all operating, maintenance, and repair costs of equipment purchased. Title to equipment acquired under this grant contract shall vest upon the grantee. Equipment should be ordered early in the grant period, but no later than July 1, 2022. Because of the strict timelines for final claims for reimbursement, it is usually not possible to order, receive, and pay for equipment during the last quarter. Dispatch, Administration, Corrections Assistance Eight percent of the total enforcement grant funding can be used for the reimbursement of dispatch, administration or corrections assistance. • Administration – Administrative duties of the grant, such as scheduling, invoicing and planning. Administrative hours must be overtime. • Dispatch - Dispatch costs must be overtime. • Corrections Assistance – Corrections assistance can be used for larger DWI enforcement details such as the Wednesday before Thanksgiving, St. Patrick’s Day, Super Bowl, fishing or hunting openers or other community festivals with a proven history with a large number of DWI arrests. Corrections assistance can be an extra jailer or driver of a transport vehicle. Corrections assistance must be overtime hours to be eligible for reimbursement. Page 6 Fringe Rates The Office of Traffic Safety reimburses fringe rates that include the combination of: 1. PERA – 17.7% effective Jan. 1, 2020) See Chapter 7, page 4 in the PERA Employer Manual (updated July 1, 2020). 2. Medicare – 1.45% (current IRS rate for all agencies) https://www.irs.gov/taxtopics/tc751.html 3. Worker’s Compensation – this is determined by each agency. Agency Match Expenses that are paid for with state, county, municipal and/or private funding demonstrate a vested interest and commitment to the program and should be reported. Agencies should claim matching funds such as: • Squad car mileage costs as operating expenses (the number of miles driven are reported in ROAR) • On-duty enforcement dedicated to a high-visibility event • Administrative time for scheduling, and paperwork for reporting and invoicing • Time to do public information and outreach • Time spent at grantee meetings with DPS-OTS • Training time related to the grant training requirements • Time spent at the TZD Conference • Hotel costs associated with the TZD Conference • Mileage to the TZD Conference • 50% of equipment costs identified in the grant agreement Reporting and Invoicing Short Reports are required to be completed by each agency according to the due date on the Enforcement calendar. Invoices and Progress Reports (Officer Activity Summary Reports from ROAR) are required to be submitted via E-grants to the OTS on the following schedule: • Jan. 24, 2022: All project activity between Oct. 1 and Dec. 31, 2021 • April 18, 2022: All project activity between Jan. 1 and March 31, 2022 • July 18, 2022: All project activity between April 1 and June 30, 2022 • Oct. 24, 2022: All project activity between July 1 and Sept. 30, 2022 Final Report Requirement A final report is due Oct. 24, 2022, and should include the following: • Review of the enforcement activity • Review of the budget • Review of the performance measures • Describe successes and challenges Page 7 Training Requirements Officers working overtime enforcement funded by this grant must have completed the following training prior to working: • IACP’s 16-hour Standardized Field Sobriety Testing (SFST) course • IACP’s Advanced Roadside Impaired Driving Enforcement (ARIDE) or Drugs That Impair Driving (DTID) • Minnesota’s Occupant Protection Usage and Enforcement (OPUE) course Refreshers Officers who last completed an SFST course of any kind before October 1, 2016, must complete an SFST Update class, the online ARIDE course and the online OPUE by Oct. 1, 2021. If training is not available within a reasonable travel distance, please contact your DPS-OTS enforcement grant coordinator to make an exception. ARIDE Online – 6 POST credits This course will instruct officers on the difference between alcohol and drug impaired drivers; how they are detected and what can be expected. Officers will learn the observable signs of seven major drug categories, medical conditions that mimic drug influence, and what they will see when they encounter drivers under the influence of specific drugs. This course may be used as ARIDE refresher. • Course access instructions • Frequently asked questions. OPUE Online This course is approximately three hours and will address seat belt, child restraint and air bag history and development. Officers will learn the engineering designs that makes these safety devices an important part of motor vehicles. Officers will be guided through the specifics about these safety devices and how they are protected both when they are occupants as well as when they respond to crashes. Quick Reference Guide: Course Length Type Standardized Field Sobriety Testing (SFST) 16 hours classroom Drugs That Impair Driving (DTID) - offered until Sept. 30, 2015 OR Advanced Roadside Impaired Driving Enforcement (ARIDE) replaced DTID on Oct. 1, 2015 6 or 8 hours 10 hours classroom classroom Occupant Protection Usage and Enforcement (OPUE) 3 hours online Effective Oct. 1, 2015, training courses are required to be refreshed within five years of their previous training date. Course Length Type Standardized Field Sobriety Testing (SFST) 4 hours classroom Advanced Roadside Impaired Driving Enforcement (ARIDE) 5 hours online Occupant Protection Usage and Enforcement (OPUE) 3 hours online Page 8 Planning and Meetings Grantees are required to meet with their DPS-OTS grant coordinator at the beginning of the grant year to plan enforcement details. Quarterly meetings, at a minimum, provide an opportunity to review grant activity, discuss ways of improving the program and plan activity. It encourages partners to take ownership of the program and may stimulate new ideas for saving lives on Minnesota’s roadways. Crash Data Resources County crash data Review county crash data to determine when and where the majority of your county’s fatal and serious injury crashes occur. This will help to determine your enforcement to make the biggest impact on the most people. If your county’s data differs from statewide data, contact your grant coordinator to discuss changes to your work plan. DWI Dashboard Maps DWI’s, severe and fatal crashes throughout Minnesota which helps law enforcement agencies coordinate and plan enforcement efforts. DWI Dashboard can be found on MyBCA. TZD Conference The TZD Conference will be a hybrid event held Oct. 13-14, 2021, in Rochester, Minnesota. This means that the conference will be held in person at the Mayo Civic Center and general sessions and select concurrent sessions will be available for live virtual viewing. More information will be posted to the conference TZD Conference page Web site as it becomes available. Hotel reimbursement: Because federal funding continues to be limited, the DPS-OTS will not reimburse grantees for the cost of hotel rooms at the conference. Several DPS-OTS grants include reimbursement of officer/employee wages, which continues to increase. When funding becomes limited, these programs along with hotel costs are not sustainable. To continue working toward the goal of zero deaths, the DPS-OTS will fund traffic safety activities instead of hotel costs. TZD Conference registration fee: The Office of Traffic Safety will continue to pay the $125 in-person TZD Conference registration fee, or the $75 virtual conference fee. DPS-OTS grant coordinators will provide further instructions on how to register after grants are awarded. Application Process The application and 2022 Work Plan can be found in E-Grants, and completed in its entirety. The application must indicate which law enforcement agency will be the fiscal agent and administrator of the grant. This agency must obtain a resolution from their city council or county board authorizing them to participate in the grant and indicate who is authorized to sign the grant agreement unless the officials below are signing the grant agreement: • Statutory Cities - Mayor and City Clerk • Counties - Board Chair and Clerk of the Board If the application is accepted, the fiscal agent will be responsible for compiling information from their partners and submitting plans, reports, and invoices to the DPS-OTS. The partner agencies are responsible for reporting their enforcement activity on a short report on the DPS-OTS website after designated campaigns on the enforcement calendar, and for providing timely information to the fiscal agency. Resolution Process Before a grant may be executed, the lead agency mentioned in the application must provide the DPS-OTS with a resolution from the appropriate city council or county board authorizing its participation in the program. Legal signatures for a city are the Mayor and City Clerk (M.S. 412.201): for a county are the Board Chair and Clerk of County Board (M.S. 375.13); or individual(s) named in resolution approved by appropriate City Council or County Board. Page 9 The sample resolution will ensure acceptability by DPS-OTS and quicker processing of awarded grants. Including a grant dollar amount in the resolution will cause problems if the amount awarded is different than the amount requested. If your council or board requires a specific amount, have the words “or a lesser amount as awarded by the Department of Public Safety” added after the amount is specified. Including the proper name of an authorized official, rather than just a title, will cause problems if the person in that position or office changes. If your council or board requires a specific name as well as title, have the words “and (his or her) successor (on staff or in office)” added after the name is specified. Application Evaluation Process Each application will be reviewed by the enforcement coordination team at the DPS-OTS. County crash data will be considered using County Population, VMT and Behavioral Measures from 2015-2019. Other items that will be evaluated in the review process: • Grant-funded enforcement performance from past grants (ROAR activity) • The percentage of DWI arrests using eCharging for each agency • Performance measures in the work plan, media plan and budget will also be evaluated as to how well the application addresses the area’s particular crash problem. Keep in mind, all grant-funded enforcement is required to be high-visibility enforcement (HVE), so the publicity portion is very important and should be as detailed as possible. Negotiations on applications may occur; clarification may be needed, hours, plans, or budgets may be modified. Applications must be submitted to the DPS-OTS via E-Grants by 5 p.m. on Tuesday, July 6, 2021. Questions regarding the application and evaluation process must be directed to Shannon Grabow, by 8 a.m., June 21, 2021. Answers to questions that are not specific to a proposal will be posted to the DPS-OTS Website within approximately three business days. Termination of a Grant A grant may be cancelled by the DPS-OTS if any of the following occur: • The grantee fails to process impaired driving arrests using the DPS eCharging system. • The grantee failed to have activity during a complete quarter unless approved in advance by the DPS-OTS grant coordinator (except during the second quarter where no enforcement campaigns are scheduled). The DPS-OTS understands that training needs may temporarily delay activity. • The Financial Status Reports (invoices) were submitted one month late at least two times during the grant year unless the grantee was given prior approval from the DPS-OTS coordinator • Two Financial Status Reports were submitted that included ineligible costs. • Other breaches of laws, requirements, rules or procedures by the grantee. A grantee is responsible for letting the DPS-OTS coordinator know whenever the project director will be away from work for fourteen consecutive days or more and for providing the coordinator with contact information on an interim project director during that time period. These rules will not be in effect in the case of a grantee agency affected by an emergency or natural disaster (such as a major fire, flood or tornado). Having a critical staff person or project director quit or otherwise leave is not a natural disaster. If a critical person leaves, the grantee is responsible for notifying their DPS-OTS coordinator and working out a timeline by which duties, reports, and invoices will be resumed with him or her and obtaining that coordinator’s written approval of the plan. Page 10 Grant Application Instructions Responses to the RFP will be submitted as an application through E-Grants. If you are new to the system click on the New User link, on the E-Grants log in page, fill out the form and save. Your request will be reviewed by DPS within a day or two. Instructions on how to use E-Grants are located on the E-Grants home page under Training Materials. Complete the following sections in the application: Agency Information - Complete the form in E-Grants The fiscal lead of the grant is the agency that is applying to enter into the grant agreement with the DPS-OTS and is the legal applicant responsible for fiscal oversight of the project. Grant Information and Work Plan - Complete the form and upload work plan in E-Grants Complete the grant information such as the population of the jurisdictions served, number of eligible officers from each agency who have completed the required training or will have done so by the beginning of the grant, project director information, planned media activity, and plans for organizing meetings and briefings prior to high-visibility enforcement time periods. The enforcement work plan will assist in creating an enforcement plan and budget. All law enforcement agencies in the grant should have input and agree to the enforcement plan prior to submitting the grant application. Enforcement Work Plan Performance Measures Tab Complete all yellow cells as indicated in the worksheet. Use the Behavioral Measures crash data from 2015-2019. Comparative Report Tab Complete all yellow cells as indicated in the worksheet. Use the Comparative Report table from ROAR to complete the “Prior Year Stops Per Hour.” Given the current events of 2020, 2019 ROAR data will be used for the comparative report. Impaired Driving Tab • Step 1 – Enter the average hourly overtime rate including fringe benefits of officers that will be working the grant-funded shifts. • Step 2 – Enter the length of shifts, number of officers working each event and number of events. • Step 3 – Verify that the number of hours per campaign are realistic for all partner agencies in the grant. If it seems too high or too low, adjust the number of events and/or officers per event as needed. • Step 4 – Enter the length of shifts for DWI Hours outside the Enforcement Calendar. Seat Belt Tab • Step 1 – Enter the average hourly overtime rate including fringe benefits of officers that will be working the grant-funded shifts. • Step 2 – Enter the length of shifts, number of officers working each event and number of events. • Step 3 – Verify that the number of hours per campaign are realistic for all partner agencies in the grant. If it seems too high or too low, adjust the number of events and/or officers per event as needed. • Step 4 – Enter additional seat belt enforcement plans outside campaigns. Speed Tab • Step 1 – Enter the average hourly overtime rate including fringe benefits of officers that will be working the grant-funded shifts. • Step 2 – Enter the length of shifts, number of officers working each event and number of events. • Step 4 – Verify that the number of hours per campaign are realistic for all partner agencies in the grant. If it seems too high or too low, adjust the number of events and/or officers per event as needed. Page 11 Distracted Tab • Step 1 – Enter the average hourly overtime rate including fringe benefits of officers that will be working the grant-funded shifts. • Step 2 – Enter the length of shifts, number of officers working each event and number of events. • Step 4 – Verify that the number of hours per campaign are realistic for all partner agencies in the grant. If it seems too high or too low, adjust the number of events and/or officers per event as needed. Move Over Tab • Step 1 – Enter the average hourly overtime rate including fringe benefits of officers that will be working the grant-funded shifts. • Step 2 – Enter the length of shifts, number of officers working each event. • Step 4 – Verify that the number of hours per campaign are realistic for all partner agencies in the grant. If it seems too high or too low, adjust the number of events and/or officers per event as needed. Pedestrian Tab (Hennepin and Ramsey Counties only) • Step 1 – Enter the average hourly overtime rate including fringe benefits of officers that will be working the grant-funded shifts. • Step 2 – Enter the length of shifts, number of officers working each event and number of events. • Step 4 – Verify that the number of hours per campaign are realistic for all partner agencies in the grant. If it seems too high or too low, adjust the number of events and/or officers per event as needed. Budget Tab The overtime enforcement funding amount and total hours of overtime enforcement will automatically calculate based on the information entered. To create the final totals, fill in the yellow cells for administration, dispatch, corrections assistance and equipment. The amount listed in administration and dispatch can be no more than the maximum amount listed on the budget tab (eight percent of the total enforcement budget). Certifications The legal applicant must acknowledge that the following documents that are attached to this Request for Proposal have been read in their entirety. E-Grants does not require a signature, but by checking the box in front of each document listed, the applicant indicates they have read them and agree with the information, terms, and conditions in the documents. These documents will be incorporated into the grant agreement if funds are awarded to the fiscal agency. The documents include the following: • Grant Program Guidelines (Attachment A) • Terms and Conditions (Attachment B) • Federal Audit Requirements (Attachment C) • Approved Work Plan • Approved Budget Risk Assessment - Complete the form in E-Grants The federal government now requires a pre-award risk assessment for all grant applications. Budget Summary This page is populated from the information entered into the budget in E-Grants Page 12 Budget These budget amounts from the work plan must be entered into the budget page in E-Grants. In E-Grants, there are two amounts to enter for each budget item. One is the budgeted amount and the other is the amount for match; funding provided by local agencies for costs not covered by the grant including mileage. Fill in a $0.00 in the match line, but you will still be able to report match during the quarterly invoicing process. Funding for the campaigns comes from different sections of the federal law authorizing money to be spent. As a result, impaired driving, seat belt, speed, and distracted driving enforcement funding are listed separately in the budget in E- Grants. It is important that each program area’s enforcement activity is kept separate throughout the life of the grant and that invoices reflect the overtime enforcement activity that supports each program area. Signature Option The DPS allows acceptance of grant agreements and amendments using several signature options. Indicate the type of signature you will use to sign the grant agreement if funds are awarded. 2022 Enforcement Organization: Orono Police Department A-ENFRC2-2022-ORONOPD-062 Agency Information Fiscal Agency Law Enforcement Agency Address City Zip Code + 4 Contact Name Email Telephone Number Orono Police Department 2730 Kelley Parkway Orono 55356-0371 Susan Schultz sschultz@ci.orono.mn.us (952) 247-4700 Federal ID #DUNS # 416008585 Partner Agencies Law Enforcement Agency Address City Zip Code + 4 Contact Name Email Telephone Number Orono Police Department 2730 Kelley Parkway Orono 55356-0371 Susan Schultz sschultz@ci.orono.mn.us (952) 247-4700 Corcoran Police Department 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran 55340-0000 Pete Eckenberg pekenberg@corcoranmn.gov (763) 400-7010 Dayton Police Department 12260 S Diamond Lake Road Dayton 55327-0000 Greg Burstad gburstad@daytonpolice.org (763) 427-2017 Deephaven Police Department 20225 Cottagewood Road Excelsior 55399-0000 Chris Whiteside chrisw@deephavenpolice.com (952) 474-7555 Medina Police Department 600 Clydesdale Trail Medina 55340-0000 Andrew Scharf andrew.scharf@medinamn.gov (763) 473-9209 Minnetrsita Police Department 7651 County Road 100 W Minnetrista 55364-0000 Nate Hintz nhintz@ci.minnetrista.mn.us (952) 446-1131 Rogers Police Department 21860 Industrial Court Rogers 55374-0000 Brandon Wegner bwegner@rogersmn.gov (763) 428-3450 South Lake Police Department 24150 Smithtown Road Shorewood 55331-0000 Adam Moore amoore@southlakepd.com (952) 474-3261 West Hennepin Public Safety Department 1918 County Road 90 Independence 55399-0000 Rick Denneson rdenneson@westhennepin.com (763) 479-0500 Golden Valley Police Department 7800 Golden Valley Road Golden Valley 55427-0000 Tom Buffie tbuffie@goldenvalleymn.gov (763) 593-8079 Crystal Police Department 4141 Douglas Drive N Crystal 55427-0000 Pete Underthun pete.underthun@crystalmn.gov (763) 531-1014 Robbinsdale Police Department 4101 Hubbard Ave N Robbinsdale 55422-0000 Josh Heasley jheasley@ci.robbinsdale.mn.us (763) 531-1220 New Hope Police Department 4401 Xylon Ave N New Hope 55428-0000 Dave Johnson djohnson@newhopemn.gov (763) 531-5170 Minneapolis Police Department 350 Fifth Street S Room #130 Minneapolis 55401-0000 David Strichter david.stichter@minneapolismn.gov (612) 673-3000 Minneapolis Parks Police Department 2117 West River Rd N Minneapolis 55422-0000 Richard Doll rdoll@minneapolisparks.org (612) 230-6400 University of Minnesota Police Department 511 SE Washington Ave # 1 Minneapolis 55455-0000 Peter Reineke reine014@umn.edu (612) 624-2677 Page 1 of 111/10/2021 Weekly Traffic Fatality Update (Year-to-Date Counts through November 14th) • In 2021, the number of year-to date traffic fatalities are the highest they have been in over five years. Through November 14th, there were 443 traffic-related deaths on Minnesota roadways. This is a 24% increase over last year at this time and a 38% increase over this time in 2019. • Speed continues to be the largest contributing factor in fatal traffic crashes. Currently at a shocking 143 speed-related deaths, this is a 30% increase from this time last year and a 117% increase from this time in 2019. To date, speed has been a factor in a third of all traffic fatalities in 2021. • Unbelted fatalities are 9% higher than this time last year (95 in 2021, 87 in 2020), and much higher than previous years (53% higher than this time in 2019). • Motorcycle fatalities are slightly higher than last year, but 52% higher than this time in 2019. • The number of year-to-date pedestrian fatalities (51) are the highest they have been since 2016 (51). 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 Fatalities MN Traffic Fatalities Jan 01-Nov 14 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 72 76 94 66 110 143 108 104 107 100 122 107 39 21 24 33 30 20 63 62 78 62 87 95 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 MN Traffic Fatalities: Contributing Factors Jan 01-Nov 14 Speed Alcohol Distraction Unbelted 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 MN Traffic Fatalities: Person Type Jan 01-Nov 14 Pedestrian Bicyclist Motorcyclist List of Fatalities Reported Between November 8th and November 14th, 2021 Date County Description 9/11/2021 Anoka A 58-year old helmetless male motorcycle driver driving on a county road collided with a vehicle that turned left in front of him. He later died from his injuries. 9/18/2021 Clearwater A 79-year old male driver driving on state highway crossed the centerline and ran off the road to the left, reentered the road, and ran off the road to the right. A medical issue was suspected. He later died from his injuries. 10/5/2021 Washington A 67-year old female pedestrian was struck by an oncoming vehicle while attempting to cross a Cottage Grove city street. She later died from her injuries. 10/11/2021 Ramsey A 27-year old male driver was speeding on a Saint Paul city street when he ran off the road, hit the curb, and then hit two light poles. He later died from his injuries. 10/17/2021 Goodhue A 70-year old male driver was driving on a US highway when he collided with a vehicle traveling down the lane in the wrong direction. He later died from his injuries. 11/8/2021 McLeod Patrol reports a 66-year old female driver was killed when, driving south on a county road, her vehicle collided with a truck traveling east on a state highway 11/8/2021 Kandiyohi A 45-year old male driver was killed when, driving on a county road, he ran a stop sign, ran off the road straight through an intersection, and hit a power box. Drug usage is suspected. 11/9/2021 Hennepin A 75-year old male driver was killed when, driving on a state highway, his tire caught on a fence being dragged by another vehicle fleeing the police, causing his vehicle to spin and hit a traffic light pole and sign post. 11/9/2021 Ramsey A 40-year old male driver was killed when, driving on a county road, his vehicle was hit by a vehicle speeding through an intersection. 11/10/2021 Jackson An 85-year old unbelted female driver was killed when, driving on a county road, she failed to negotiate a curve, ran off the road, and struck a culvert. 11/10/2021 Anoka A 25-year old male driver was killed when, driving while distracted on a state highway, he accelerated over the centerline and struck an oncoming semi. 11/11/2021 Stearns 22-year old unbelted male driver was killed when, exceeding the speed limit on a county road, he ran off the road, struck an embankment, became airborne, and collided with a residence. 11/11/2021 St. Louis Patrol reports a 32-year old female driver and her 11-year old male passenger were killed when, driving on a state highway, she lost control, crossed the center line, hit an oncoming vehicle, then was struck by a different oncoming vehicle. 11/12/2021 Rice A 42-yr old female driver was killed when, riding on an ATV being towed by a pickup using a tow strap, the strap became entangled in the wheels of the ATV and it overturned on a county road. 11/13/2021 Chisago A 39-year old unbelted male driver was killed when, driving on a county road, he ran off the road, struck a driveway approach, became airborne, and rolled his vehicle. 11/14/2021 Ramsey A 31-year old male pedestrian was killed when he jumped out of a vehicle traveling on an interstate and was hit by an oncoming vehicle. RESOLUTION NO. 21-99 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING A GRANT FROM THE STATE OF MINNESOTA, PARTNERING WITH FISCAL AGENT ORONO FOR TOWARD ZERO DEATHS ENFORCEMENT GRANT PROGRAM WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution 04-20 on March 16, 2004, which established a policy for the receipt of gifts; and WHEREAS, the Policy and Minnesota Statutes, section 465.03 state that a grant or gift of real or personal property must be accepted by the City Council by resolution and be approved by a two-thirds majority of the Council. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council accepts the following grant on behalf of its citizens: Grant from the State of Minnesota Department of Public Safety, Toward Zero Deaths Enforcement Grant Program, administered by the City of Orono, in the amount not to exceed $25,000. Agency participation will be reported back to Council on total amount used. Adopted by the City Council of Golden Valley, Minnesota this 7th day of December, 2021. _____________________________ Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: _____________________________ Theresa J. Schyma, City Clerk Golden Valley City Council Meeting December 7, 2021 Agenda Item 3. D. Approve Resolution No. 21-91 Designating Polling Places for the 2022 Election Cycle Prepared By Theresa Schyma, City Clerk Summary In 2017, the state legislature amended State Statute 204B.16, subd. 1 requiring the governing body of each municipality to designate by resolution a polling place for each election precinct by December 31 of each year. The polling places designated in the resolution will be used for the 2022 election cycle, unless a change is made because of redistricting, an emergency, or if a polling place becomes unavailable. The City of Golden Valley has eight polling locations. With the ongoing health and safety concerns regarding COVID-19, staff will continue to follow any and all current health guidelines that are in place at the time of the election. Maintaining a safe level of protection for voters and election judges is important and will be factored into plans for the 2022 election cycle. Furthermore, following every census the process of redistricting must occur. Staff are not anticipating any changes to congressional or state district lines that would impact Golden Valley. However, this process is the appropriate time to look at the number and distribution of polling locations in Golden Valley. Staff will be completing this process in the first quarter of 2022. Per Minnesota Statutes § 204B.14 subd. 3(e), precinct boundaries must be reestablished within 60 days of the time when the legislature has been redistricted. For this reason, the Council will be reestablishing precinct boundaries by resolution in the second quarter of 2022. Staff will inform the Council of any recommended changes to precinct boundaries or polling locations at a work session in 2022. Financial Or Budget Considerations Not applicable Recommended Action Motion to adopt Resolution No. 21-91 designating polling places for the 2022 election cycle. Supporting Documents • Resolution No. 21-91 designating polling places for the 2022 election cycle (1 page) RESOLUTION NO. 21-91 RESOLUTION DESIGNATING POLLING PLACES FOR THE 2022 ELECTION CYCLE WHEREAS, State Statute 204B.16, subd. 1 requires the governing body of each municipality to designate by resolution a polling place for each election by December 31 of each year; and WHEREAS, changes to the polling locations may be made at least 90 days before the next election if one or more of the authorized polling places becomes unavailable for use; and WHEREAS, changes to the polling locations may be made in the case of an emergency when it is necessary to ensure a safe and secure location for voting; and WHEREAS, the Primary Election will be August 9, 2022, and the General Election will be November 8, 2022. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Golden Valley City Council that the 2021 General election, as well as any required special elections, will take place at the following precinct polling locations: Precinct 1 - NE Fire Station, 3700 Golden Valley Road Precinct 2 - Valley Presbyterian Church, 3100 North Lilac Drive Precinct 3 - Meadowbrook School, 5430 Glenwood Avenue Precinct 4 - Sandburg Middle School, 2400 Sandburg Lane Precinct 5 - SE Fire Station, 400 Turners Crossroad South Precinct 6 - Golden Valley City Hall, 7800 Golden Valley Road Precinct 7 - Sandburg Middle School, 2400 Sandburg Lane Precinct 8 - Brookview, 316 Brookview Parkway South BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the City Clerk is with this, authorized to make any changes as deemed necessary in the case of an emergency or if a polling place becomes unavailable. Adopted by the City Council of Golden Valley, Minnesota this 7th day of December, 2021. _____________________________ Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: _____________________________ Theresa J. Schyma, City Clerk Golden Valley City Council Meeting December 7, 2021 Agenda Item 3. E. Approve Summary of Conclusion Regarding City Manager Performance Evaluation from Closed Executive Session on November 30, 2021 Prepared By Kirsten Santelices, Deputy City Manager/Human Resources Director Summary of Conclusion Regarding City Manager Performance Evaluation from November 30, 2021 At a Closed Session on November 30, 2021 the City Council conducted a mid-year performance evaluation for City Manager Tim Cruikshank. No further changes to Mr. Cruikshank’s employment agreement or compensation were recommended at this time. Financial Or Budget Considerations NA Recommended Action • Motion to accept Summary of Conclusion Regarding City Manager Performance Evaluation from Closed Executive Session on November 30, 2021 Supporting Documents NA Golden Valley City Council Meeting December 7, 2021 Agenda Item 3. F. Joint Powers Agreement for the West Metro Home Remodeling Fair Prepared By Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager Summary The Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) for the West Metro Home Remodeling Fair has been drafted by representatives from each of the associated Cities and Community Education programs following a recommendation from the City Managers of Golden Valley, Minnetonka, and St. Louis Park. After years of operating a successful Home Remodeling Fair serving thousands of homeowners through the west metro area, the participants are moving to formalize their structure and operations. The Golden Valley City Attorney prepared and reviewed this document. Staff supports this effort. Recommended Action Motion to approve Resolution No. 21-92 authorizing the Joint Powers Agreement Between Golden Valley, Minnetonka, Saint Louis Park, Hopkins Community Education, and Saint Louis Park Community Education for the West Metro Home Remodeling Fair. Supporting Documents • Resolution authorizing Joint Powers Agreement Between Golden Valley, Minnetonka, Saint Louis Park, Hopkins Community Education, and Saint Louis Park Community Education for the West Metro Home Remodeling Fair (1 page) • Joint Powers Agreement Between Golden Valley, Minnetonka, Saint Louis Park, Hopkins Community Education, and Saint Louis Park Community Education for the West Metro Home Remodeling Fair (10 pages) RESOLUTION NO. 21-92 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT BETWEEN GOLDEN VALLEY, MINNETONKA, SAINT LOUIS PARK, HOPKINS COMMUNITY EDUCATION, AND SAINT LOUIS PARK COMMUNITY EDUCATION FOR THE WEST METRO HOME REMODELING FAIR WHEREAS, the Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) is for the West Metro Home Remodeling Fair; and WHEREAS, the Fair is an annual event aimed at providing residents with ideas, information, and resources to promote improvements to housing in the participating communities; and WHEREAS, the Fair features a wide variety of exhibitors with products and services related to home improvement, including remodeling contractors, architects, landscapers, financial lenders, and City inspectors; and WHEREAS, the JPA clarifies roles and responsibilities for the participants, including annual work plans, finances, and any potential changes in participation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council for the City of Golden Valley, to authorize the Joint Powers Agreement between Golden Valley, Minnetonka, Saint Louis Park, Hopkins Community Education, and Saint Louis Park Community Education for the West Metro Home Remodeling Fair. Adopted by the City Council this 7th day of December, 2021. _____________________________ Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: _____________________________ Theresa Schyma, City Clerk Joint Powers Agreement Between Golden Valley, Minnetonka, Saint Louis Park, Hopkins Community Education, and Saint Louis Park Community Education for West Metro Home Remodeling Fair This Joint Powers Agreement (“Agreement”) is made by and between the City of Golden Valley (“Golden Valley”), the City of Minnetonka (“Minnetonka”), the City of Saint Louis Park (“St. Louis Park”), Hopkins Community Education (“Hopkins Community Ed.”), and Saint Louis Park Community Education (“St. Louis Park Community Ed.”) (referred to herein as the “Party” or “Participant” individually, and collectively as the “Parties” or “Participants”) and effective as of December 7, 2021. RECITALS 1. The Parties are units of government responsible for housing and redevelopment and community education in their respective communities. 2. The Parties desire to jointly host an annual West Metro Home Remodeling Fair (the “Fair”). 3. The goal of the Fair is to provide residents with ideas, information, and resources to promote improvements to housing in the participating communities. The Fair features a wide variety of exhibitors with products and services related to home improvement, including remodeling contractors, architects, landscapers, financial lenders, and City inspectors. 4. The Parties believe the Fair serves an important purpose in the community by encouraging reinvestment in the existing housing stock and providing information to residents regarding local home remodeling resources and opportunities. 5. The Parties wish to reinforce their positive and collaborative relationship by entering into this Agreement. TERMS OF UNDERSTANDING 1. Purpose. The Parties wish to host the Fair annually to promote improvements to housing and provide community education opportunities in the participating communities. 2. Authority. The Parties enter into this Agreement pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, section 471.59. 3. The Participants. a. Participation. The Parties shall be the initial Participants. Additional governmental entities may become a Participant upon approval by all of the then existing Participants and execution by the new entity of this Agreement. b. Change in Participation. i. Any Participant may withdraw from this Agreement upon 30 days’ written notice. ii. The Participants may involuntarily terminate a Participant for any reason upon an affirmative vote of a majority of the then existing Participants. A withdrawing or involuntarily terminated party is entitled to the return of its own property, but is not entitled to any share or portion of Fair funds or assets. In the event of withdrawal or involuntary termination by any member, this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect as to all remaining members. 4. The Parties’ Roles and Responsibilities. The Participants agree to assume the roles and responsibilities set forth in the attached Exhibit A. Each year no later than November first, the Participants shall prepare an updated Exhibit A setting forth the Fair location and each Participant’s obligations for the upcoming year. Updates to Exhibit A shall not require the approval of the Participants’ governing bodies, but all such updates shall be agreed upon by staff annually and filed with the Fair’s official records. 5. Administration. The Participants shall meet at least once annually to discuss work completed during the past year, work proposed for the following year, and any proposed changes to this Agreement or Exhibit A. The Participants agree that records created pursuant to this Agreement shall be retained in a manner that meets each Participant’s respective records retention schedule and shall be subject to the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act. 6. Funding and Finances. a. Fair operations shall be financed from funds and resources collected from vendor registration fees or other grants or donations. The Fair shall be self-sustaining without the need for monetary contributions from the Participants. If the need for monetary contributions arises, no Participant shall be required to contribute funds unless all Participants have agreed in writing to the terms of such contributions. b. St. Louis Park shall serve as the Fair’s fiscal agent and shall be responsible for the following tasks: 1. Serve as the sole administrator of all funds contributed by the Participants or otherwise received to support the Fair, and in such capacity receive all funds for deposit and make disbursements therefrom; 2. Accept grants and donations on behalf of the Fair; 3. Maintain current and accurate records of all obligations and expenditures of Fair funds in accordance with fiscal agent policy and generally accepted accounting principles; 4. Enter into agreements on behalf of the Fair; 5. Prepare regular financial reports as relevant for the duration of the planning, execution, and follow-up of the Fair and disseminate them to the Participants; and 6. Prepare annual financial reports which include the following information: a. The financial condition of the Fair b. The status of all Fair projects c. The business transacted by the Fair d. Other matters related to the Fair that affect the interests of the Parties. c. The Participants shall each provide all salary, compensation, and benefits to their separate employees. 7. Limitation of Liability. To the fullest extent permitted by law, actions by the Participants pursuant to this Agreement are intended to be and shall be construed as a “cooperative activity,” and it is the intent of the Participants that they shall be deemed a “single governmental unit” for the purposes of liability, all as set forth in Minn. Stat. Section 471.59, Subd. 1a(a). Each Participant agrees that it will be responsible for its own acts and the acts of its employees and any liability resulting therefrom to the extent authorized by law and, for purposes of §471.59, each Participant expressly declines responsibility for the acts or omissions of any other Participant. 8. Insurance. Each Participant acknowledges and agrees that it is insured or self-insured consistent with the requirements of Minnesota law. Each Participant agrees to promptly notify all other Participants if it becomes aware of any potential claims related to the Fair. 9. Term. This Agreement shall continue until terminated in the manner provided herein. 10. Termination. a. This Agreement may terminate upon the occurrence of any one of the following events, whichever occurs first: i. When necessary due to failure to obtain necessary funding from the Participants; or ii. When a majority of Participants agree to terminate the Agreement upon a certain date. b. Upon termination of this Agreement, the Participants shall provide for the distribution of all Fair funds and assets in the following manner: i. The Parties may determine to sell and liquidate non-monetary assets prior to distribution; and ii. Assets and funds shall be distributed to the Participants in proportion to their contributions. Property owned by the Participants shall be returned to the owner upon termination. A Participant who ceases participation prior to termination of this Agreement is entitled to the return of its own property, but is not entitled to any share or portion of Fair funds or assets. 11. Amendment. The Participants may amend this Agreement by mutual written agreement. Any such amendment shall only be effective if duly executed by the authorized representatives of each Participant. 12. Applicable Law and Venue. The laws of the State of Minnesota shall govern the interpretation and enforcement of this Agreement and any actions arising out of or relating to this Agreement shall be brought in Hennepin County District Court in the state of Minnesota. Executed the day and year first above written, by the parties as follows: CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY: By: _________________________________ 12-07-21 Shepard M. Harris, Mayor By: _________________________________ 12-07-21 Timothy J. Cruikshank, City Manager Executed the day and year first above written, by the parties as follows: CITY OF MINNETONKA: By: _________________________________ Brad Wiersum, Mayor By: _________________________________ Mike Funk, Acting City Manager Executed the day and year first above written, by the parties as follows: CITY OF SAINT LOUIS PARK: By: _________________________________ Jake Spano, Mayor By: _________________________________ Kim Keller, City Manager Executed the day and year first above written, by the parties as follows: HOPKINS COMMUNITY EDUCATION: By: _________________________________ Rhoda Mhiripiri-Reed, Superintendent By: _________________________________ Jen Bouchard, School Board Chair Executed the day and year first above written, by the parties as follows: ST. LOUIS PARK COMMUNITY EDUCATION: By: _________________________________ Astein Osei, Superintendent By: _________________________________ Mary Tomback, School Board Chair Exhibit A Roles & Responsibilities Event Date Event Location Task Responsible Party Provide at least one staff member to work at the Home Remodeling Fair on the day of the event (duties assigned in advance) Graphic design Marketing – i.e. sharing social media posts, City newsletters, Community Ed brochures, electronic billboards, and other platforms Signage printing (rotate printing of new signage) Coordinate and recruit volunteers Site operations – need to determine need for Saturday set up; phase out for Jigsaw to take over in the future City/School District booths Event weekend tech support and café coordination Reserve officers to assist with parking and other day of event duties Idea Center Seminars Operation Rescue Room Photography on event day Videography to record seminars on event day Develop ideas for articles for the website Special Circumstances: Golden Valley City Council Meeting December 7, 2021 Agenda Item 3. G. Approve City Council Consent for the Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) Levy Payable in 2022, Resolution No. 21-93 Prepared By Sue Virnig, Finance Director Summary Earlier tonight, the HRA considered a 2022-2023 proposed budget and levy payable in 2022. If the HRA approved the resolution, the City should consider Resolution No. 21-93 Granting City Council Consent for the Housing and Redevelopment Authority Adopted Levy payable in 2022. Financial Or Budget Considerations The proposed HRA on the 2022 Proposed Property Tax statement is under Other Special Taxing Districts. The levy for $214,000 will add $14.50 to the median home value of $345,000. Recommended Action Motion to approve Resolution No. 21-93 Granting City Council Consent and Authorization for the Housing and Redevelopment Adopted Tax Levy Payable in 2022 Supporting Documents • Resolution No. 21-93 to Approve Consent and Authorization for the Housing and Redevelopment Adopted Tax Levy Payable in 2022 (1 page) RESOLUTION NO. 21-93 APPROVE CONSENT AND AUTHORIZATION FOR THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT ADOPTED TAX LEVY PAYABLE IN 2022 WHEREAS, The Golden Valley Housing and Redevelopment Authority (the “HRA”) has authorities and powers according to MN Statutes, Sections 469.001 to 469.047. MS Statutes, Section 469.033, subd. 6 grants the HRA the power to levy and collect taxes subject to a resolution of consent from the Golden Valley City Council for a set period and, WHEREAS, The Golden Valley HRA approved Resolution 21-03 on September 21, 2021 Adopting the Housing and Redevelopment Authority Budget and Adopted Tax Levy Payable in 2022 and, WHEREAS, The City of Golden Valley passed Resolution 21-74 Consenting Intent for HRA Levy for a Housing Program HRA Levy Payable in 2022 on September 21, 2021 and, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City of Golden Valley Council as follows: The City of Golden Valley City Council hereby consents to and authorizes an HRA tax levy in the amount not to exceed $214,000 payable in 2022. Adopted by the City Council of Golden Valley this 7th day of December, 2021. __________________________ Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: ________________________________ Theresa J. Schyma, City Clerk Golden Valley City Council Meeting December 7, 2021 Agenda Item 3. H. Adopt 2022-2031 Capital Improvement Program, Resolution No. 21-94 Prepared By Sue Virnig, Finance Director Summary The 2022-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) was reviewed by the City Council at the Council Manager meeting on September 14. It was reviewed by the Planning Commission at their meeting of November 8. The financing section outlines the appropriate budget for each section. The entire CIP is located on the City website under http://www.goldenvalleymn.gov/budget/index.php. Two projects have been approved by council and were added subsequently were the water and street improvements for the Trunk Highway 55 Underpass project in 2023. Financial Or Budget Considerations The supporting documents are projects planned for the next 10 years. The current year is included in the 2022-2023 biennial budget. Recommended Action Motion to Approve Resolution No. 21-94 Adopting the 2022-2031 Capital Improvement Program. Supporting Documents • Resolution No. 21-94 Adopting the 2022-2031 Capital Improvement Program (1 page) • 2022-2031 Projects by Department (8 pages) RESOLUTION NO. 21-94 RESOLUTION APPROVING 2022-2031 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the proposed 2022-2031 Capital Improvement Program at the September 14, 2021 Council/Manager meeting; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the proposed 2022-2031 Capital Improvement Program due to its relationship with the Comprehensive Plan on November 8, 2021; and WHEREAS, financing for projects outlined in the 2022-2031 Capital Improvement Program will be reviewed each year and provided for by current approved budget or specifically identified in the financing section in this document. ATTACHMENT A: 2022-2031 Projects by Department; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Golden Valley approves the 2022-2031 Capital Improvement Program. Adopted by the City Council of Golden Valley this 7th day of December, 2021. _____________________________ Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: _____________________________ Theresa J. Schyma, City Clerk Capital PlanCity of Golden Valley, MinnesotaPROJECTS BY DEPARTMENT2022 2031thruTotal2022 2023 2024 2025 2026Department2027 2028 2029 2030 2031#Brookview Golden Valley178,00010,000 47,000 39,000 12,000 10,000 10,000 22,000 28,000Internal Repairs, Replacements and UpdatesBC-002107,00017,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 18,000 12,000 12,000 12,000External Repairs, Replacements and UpdatesBC-00320,00010,00010,000Brookview ADA updatesBC-00420,00020,000Brookview Firepit and FireplacesBC-00560,00015,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 15,000 5,000 5,000Brookview Lighting-Electrical-Low VoltageBC-00688,0006,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 10,000 6,000 30,000Furniture Replacement (Indoor & Outdoor)BC-00752,0007,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 15,000 5,000 5,000 5,000Backyard Indoor Play Area-Updates/ReplacementsBC-008Brookview Golden Valley Total525,00065,000 75,000 69,000 64,000 60,000 52,000 60,000 80,000Buildings255,00050,00055,000 100,000 50,000GeneratorsB-012300,00030,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000Installation of Building Security SystemsB-027150,000150,000Public Buildings Roof ReplacementsB-041350,000350,000City Hall Boiler ReplacementB-043375,000375,00010th Ave Storage Building-Insulate and HeatB-046475,000125,000 125,000 125,000 100,00010th Ave Storage YardB-0481,200,000200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000Park Shelters ADA and Other Building ImprovementsB-04960,00030,000 30,000Furnaces-Various BuildingsB-05275,00075,000Street Maintenance Garage Door ExpansionB-05450,00050,000City Hall Lunch Room RemodelB-055100,000100,000Skylight RestorationsB-05612,600,0003,400,000 9,200,000Remote Fire StationB-5749,000,00049,000,000Public Works FacilityB-58Buildings Total64,990,000910,000 4,035,000 9,930,000 330,000 230,000 230,000 85,000 130,000 49,080,000 30,000 Total2022 2023 2024 2025 2026Department2027 2028 2029 2030 2031#Golf Course324,000324,000Golf CartsGC-0091,039,500108,000 107,100 106,200 105,300 104,400 103,500 102,600 101,700 100,800 99,900Irrigation System UpgradeGC-026750,00050,000 170,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 180,000 50,000Golf Course InfrastructureGC-0411,800,0001,800,000Irrigation SystemGC-043200,00015,000 40,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 40,000 15,000Restaurant OperationsGC-04860,00015,000 15,000 15,000 15,000Golf Business OperationsGC-0491,055,000100,000 100,000 100,000 155,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000Golf Maintenance EquipmentGC-050Golf Course Total5,228,5002,088,000 432,100 271,200 325,300 593,400 268,500 282,600 281,700 420,800 264,900Parks201,00013,000 10,000 25,000 30,000 30,000 18,000 23,000 30,000 22,000Bleacher, Soccer Goal, Team Bench & Picnic TablesP-001750,000120,000 220,000 40,000 60,000 70,000 80,000 40,000 60,000 60,000Park Trail and Parking Lot ImprovementP-002905,00065,000 65,000 65,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 350,000 80,000Play Structure ReplacementP-003170,00012,000 10,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 28,000 20,000 20,000Outdoor Hard Surface ReplacementP-01515,0007,000 8,000Park Signage ReplacementP-016226,00035,000 25,000 60,000 28,000 28,000 50,000Sun Shelter Replacements and AdditionsP-017111,00015,000 15,000 35,000 15,000 17,000 14,000Tennis & Pickleball Court Resurfacing, Lights&ImpP-018450,000450,000Tennis & Pickleball Court ConstructionP-02095,00045,000 50,000Community GardensP-025385,00025,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 50,000 80,000 80,000 50,000 25,000Dugout, Fence and Field ReplacementP-02775,00015,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000Sand Volleyball CourtsP-032235,00025,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 30,000 30,000Nature/Open Space RestorationP-034592,00025,000 60,000 70,000 60,000 60,000 50,000 82,000 95,000 90,000Park LED Light ReplacementsP-037375,00075,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000Outdooe Hockey Rink ReplacementP-039Parks Total4,585,000430,000 955,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000Storm Water8,000,0001,250,000 750,000 750,000 750,000 750,000 750,000 750,000 750,000 750,000 750,000Residential Storm Sewer ImprovementsSS-01225,000225,000Street SweeperSS-05350,000350,000Street SweeperSS-1635,00035,000Pickup Truck (Storm Water Utility)SS-221,500,000300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000Storm Water Pond DredgingSS-2367,00067,000V-Box Spreader and Anti-Ice (tandem)SS-262,500,000250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000Flood Mitigation (Floodproofing, Voluntary)SS-34 Total2022 2023 2024 2025 2026Department2027 2028 2029 2030 2031#495,00055,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000Utility MachineSS-41335,000335,000Zane Avenue & Lindsay St ReconstructionSS-461,650,000440,000 330,000 880,000Medley Park Stormwater Treatment FacilitySS-4920,00020,000800 MHz RadiosSS-512,250,000150,000 300,000 150,000 300,000 150,000 300,000 150,000 300,000 150,000 300,000Storm Sewer Repairs-MS4 and OtherSS-535,850,0001,770,000 1,000,000 2,780,000 300,000Decola Pond F Storage & Diversion ProjectSS-5450,00050,000Bassett Creek Regional Trail-Storm Sewer RepairsSS-6050,00050,000V-Box SanderSS-6350,00050,000Salt Brine Production EquipmentSS-643,350,00050,000 1,650,000 1,650,000Toledo Avenue Flood Mitigation ProjectSS-65770,000110,000 660,000Bassett Creek Restorationn Project-Regent to GV RdSS-6740,00040,000Turf SweeperSS-683,010,0001,980,000 1,030,000Decola Ponds SEA School Flood Reduction ProjectSS-69550,000125,000 125,000 300,000Study Flood Risk in Localized Flood-prone AreasSS-70600,000300,000 300,000Inspect and Maintain Large Diameter Storm SewersSS-71500,000500,000Zenith Avenue ReconstructionSS-7280,00080,000Compact ExcavatorSS-73150,000150,000Bassett Creek Restoration in Brookview Golf CourseSS-74500,00050,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000Water Quality Pond RestorationSS-75750,000750,000Laurel Greenbelt Culvert ReplacementSS-76Storm Water Total33,727,0005,147,000 3,525,000 4,665,000 3,465,000 4,925,000 4,105,000 3,430,000 1,425,000 1,635,000 1,405,000Streets11,850,0003,950,000 3,950,000 3,950,000Pavement Management ProgramS-0012,500,0002,500,000Zane Ave and Lindsay StreetS-0092,500,0001,500,000 500,000 500,000Pavement Management OverlaysS-0131,250,000125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000Municipal State Aid (MSA) Street MaintenanceS-0171,000,000100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000Streetscape and City Hall Complex RenovationS-0181,611,950279,550 271,000 268,750 266,000 265,935 260,715MSA Debt ServiceS-0191,500,000150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000Sidewalks, Trails, & Bike Facility UpgradesS-030121,00012,100 12,100 12,100 12,100 12,100 12,100 12,100 12,100 12,100 12,100Auto CAD ApplicationS-032200,00020,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000Cartegraph Street Management SoftwareS-034 Total2022 2023 2024 2025 2026Department2027 2028 2029 2030 2031#500,000100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000Retaining Wall RepairsS-036750,000250,000 250,000 250,000Railroad Crossing ImprovementsS-0421,900,0001,900,000Laurel Avenue and Louisiana Av RepairsS-0431,000,000100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000Pavement Surface TreatmentsS-04412,600,0002,100,000 2,100,000 2,100,000 2,100,000 2,100,000 2,100,000Street Infrastructure Renewal Program (IRP)S-045750,00075,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000Street Light ReplacementS-0462,000,0002,000,000Zenith Avenue ReconstructionS-0477,000,0003,500,000 3,500,000Douglas Mini-Roundabout & Olson Frontage ImpS-0481,500,000150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000Traffic Signal UpgradesS-050500,000500,000Bassett Creek Regional Trail ADA ImprovementsS-051125,000125,000Downtown Traffic StudyS-052350,000175,000 175,000Duluth Street Sidewalk InstallationS-053750,000750,000Noble Avenue Retaining Wall ReplacementS-054350,000250,000 100,000Pedestrian Crossing UpgradesS-055500,000500,000TH55 Multiuse Trail Schaper Rd/Theo Wirth ParkwayS-0561,835,0001,835,000Traffic Signal Replacement-GV RdS-0572,200,0002,200,000Wayz Blvd Multiuse Trail-Cedar Lake to FranceS-05965,00065,000TH 55 Underpass-Temporary EasementsS-060Streets Total57,207,95010,611,650 11,518,100 9,160,850 1,498,100 5,198,035 5,242,815 2,932,100 2,832,100 3,182,100 5,032,100Vehicles and Equipment1,150,000120,000 120,000 120,000 80,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 80,000 120,000 150,000Marked Squad Cars (Police)V&E-001950,00095,000 95,000 95,000 95,000 95,000 95,000 95,000 95,000 95,000 95,000Computers and Printers (Finance)V&E-002100,000100,000Phone System (Finance)V&E-00435,00035,000Pickup Truck (Engineering)V&E-00880,00040,000 40,000Passenger Vehicle (Fire)V&E-011250,000250,000Asphalt Paver (Street)V&E-012100,00050,000 50,000Portable Computers (Police)V&E-020135,000135,000Sign Truck (Street)V&E-02240,00040,000Unmarked Police Vehicle (Police)V&E-02485,00085,000Dump Truck (Park)V&E-029125,000125,000Rotary Mower (Park)V&E-030230,000230,000Dump Truck (Street)V&E-03230,00030,000Streetscape Banners (Street)V&E-03875,00075,000Utility Tractor (Park)V&E-039 Total2022 2023 2024 2025 2026Department2027 2028 2029 2030 2031#30,00030,000Van (Park and Recreation)V&E-04235,00035,000Pickup Truck (Engineering)V&E-044200,000200,000Rescue Vehicle (Fire)V&E-04565,00065,000Pickup Truck (Park)V&E-04750,00050,000Rotary Mower (Park)V&E-04825,00025,000Asphalt Cold Planer (Street)V&E-052285,000285,000Dump Truck (Street)V&E-053100,000100,000Pickup Truck (Vehicle Maintenance)V&E-054125,000125,000Rescue Vehicle (Fire)V&E-059100,000100,000Extrication Tools (Fire)V&E-06145,00045,000Pickup Truck (Street)V&E-063100,000100,000Utility Tractor Mower (Park)V&E-069250,000250,000Single Axle Dump Truck (Street)V&E-07040,00040,000Pickup Truck (Engineering)V&E-072300,000300,000Aerial Bucket Truck(Park)V&E-078300,000300,000Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus (Fire)V&E-084495,00055,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000Sidewalk/Maintenance Tractor (Parks)V&E-08930,00030,000Asphalt Hot Box (Street)V&E-09960,00060,000Pickup Truck (Park)V&E-10040,00040,000Pickup Truck (Fire)V&E-10230,00030,000Walk Behind Saw (Street)V&E-103550,00055,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000Bobcat Utility Truckster (Park)V&E-107250,000250,000Dump Truck (Street)V&E-11025,00025,000Portable Radar TrailerV&E-115550,00055,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000Bobcat Toolcat (Park)V&E-116170,000170,000Sidewalk Tractor (Street)V&E-11825,00025,000Tasers (Police)V&E-121255,000175,000 80,000800 MHZ Radios (Fire)V&E-127285,000175,000 110,000800 MHZ Radios (Police)V&E-12945,00045,000Asphalt Roller(streets)V&E-13175,00075,000Thermal Imaging Cameras (Fire)V&E-132100,000100,000800 MHz Radios (Public Works Maintenance)V&E-133340,70024,070 124,070 24,070 24,070 24,070 24,070 24,070 24,070 24,070 24,070Body Cameras (Police)V&E-1355,5005,500Zodiac Boat (Fire)V&E-1365,5005,500Outboard Motor (Fire)V&E-13780,00040,000 40,000Passenger Vehicle (Fire)V&E-13880,00040,000 40,000Passenger Vehicle (Fire)V&E-13935,00035,000Pickup Truck (Park)V&E-14185,00085,000Dump Truck (Park)V&E-142 Total2022 2023 2024 2025 2026Department2027 2028 2029 2030 2031#75,00075,000Trash Compactor (Park)V&E-143650,00065,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000Skid Steer Loader (Street)V&E-14585,00085,000Dump Truck (Street)V&E-14650,00050,000Police Commander Vehicle (Police)V&E-147300,000300,000Water Tanker Truck (Street)V&E-149150,000150,000Asset Management Software UpgradeV&E-15080,00040,000 40,000Passenger Vehicle (Fire)V&E-15220,00020,000Equipment Trailer (Street)V&E-15330,00030,000Traffic Trailer (Police)V&E-1545,0005,000Trailer (Street)V&E-15540,00040,000Passenger Car (Police)V&E-15850,00050,000Salt Brine Production Equipment (Streets)V&E-15950,00050,000Physical Development PlotterV&E-16035,00035,000Pickup Truck (Engineering)V&E-16235,00035,000Pickup Truck (Engineering)V&E-16375,00075,000Trailer (Fire)V&E-164750,000750,000Fire Pumper (Fire)V&E-16540,00040,000Pickup Truck (Fire)V&E-16650,00050,000Utility Truck (Parks)V&E-16712,50012,500Rotary Mower (Parks)V&E-16812,50012,500Spreader-SprayerV&E-16935,00035,000Pickup Truck (Parks)V&E-1705,0005,000Trailer(Parks)V&E-1715,0005,000Trailer (Parks)V&E-17235,00035,000Utility Tractor (Parks)V&E-17350,00050,000Utility Truck (Parks)V&E-174110,000110,000Rotary Mower (Parks)V&E-17550,00050,000Utility Truck (Parks)V&E-176385,00055,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000Utility Machine (Parks)V&E-177110,000110,000Rotary Mower (Parks)V&E-17815,00015,000Field Line Painter (Parks)V&E-17980,00080,000Hooklift Truck (Streets)V&E-18010,00010,000Trailer (Streets)V&E-18135,00035,000Pickup Truck (Street)V&E-182150,000150,000Utility Machine (Streets)V&E-18365,00065,000Oil Distributor (Streets)V&E-18510,00010,000Trailer (Streets)V&E-186250,000250,000Wheel LoaderV&E187270,000270,000Dump Truck (Streets)V&E-188230,000230,000Hooklift Truck (Streets)V&E-189 Total2022 2023 2024 2025 2026Department2027 2028 2029 2030 2031#150,000150,000Utility Machine (Streets)V&E-19010,00010,000Trailer (Police)V&E-19180,00040,00040,000Unmarked Vehicle (Police)V&E-19280,00040,00040,000Unmarked Vehicle (Police)V&E-19340,00040,000Unmarked Vehicle (Police)V&E-194120,00040,000 40,000 40,000Unmarked Vehicle (Police)V&E-19540,00040,000Marked Pickup Truck(Police)V&E-196150,000150,000Wheel LoaderV&E-199230,000230,000Dump Truck (Streets)V&E-201280,000280,000Dump Truck (Streets)V&E-20220,00020,000Asphalt Wheel SawV&E-250Vehicles and Equipment Total14,746,7001,415,070 1,449,070 1,764,070 1,659,070 1,254,070 1,474,070 1,889,070 999,070 1,094,070 1,749,070Water & Sewer Systems3,900,0001,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000Sanitary Sewer & Water Line Repair/Recon.W&SS-00118,200,0002,600,000 2,600,000 2,600,000 2,600,000 2,600,000 2,600,000 2,600,000Infrastructure Renewal Plan (IRP)W&SS-00240,00040,000Pickup TruckW&SS-011250,000250,000Sewer Jet TruckW&SS-012100,000100,000Pickup TruckW&SS-01475,00075,000Pickup TruckW&SS-01525,00025,000Cargo VanW&SS-02875,00075,000Pickup/Utility TruckW&SS-03710,00010,000Multiquip Portable GeneratorW&SS-0411,500,000150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000Mill and Overlay Water/Sewer RepairsW&SS-0515,0005,000Portable GeneratorW&SS-052250,000250,000Televising EquipmentW&SS-05310,00010,000TrailerW&SS-05425,00025,000Structure and Pipe Inspection Pole CameraW&SS-0551,000,000100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000Valve Replacement/Watermain LiningW&SS-0661,250,000250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000I-394 Inflow/Infiltration ProjectW&SS-07470,00035,000 35,000Sewer Flow MetersW&SS-0762,200,000100,000 100,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000Sanitary Sewer Lining I/I ReductionW&SS-07840,00040,000Asset Management EquipmentW&SS-08040,00040,000800 MHz RadiosW&SS-081770,000770,000T.H. 55 Lift Station RelocationW&SS-08335,00035,000Almond Portable Gen/Light Plant TrailerW&SS-08450,00050,000Trenchless Request for InformationW&SS-0862,200,000100,000 100,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000Complete Water Meter ReplacementW&SS-087 Total2022 2023 2024 2025 2026Department2027 2028 2029 2030 2031#5,0005,0003" Dewatering PumpW&SS-0885,0005,0004" Dewatering PumpW&SS-08950,00050,0006" Dewatering PumpW&SS-09030,00030,000Air CompressorW&SS-0915,0005,000Cement MixerW&SS-09345,00045,000Pickup TruckW&SS-09410,00010,000TrailerW&SS-09515,00015,000TrailerW&SS-09730,00030,000Trailer Mounted Air CompressorW&SS-09830,00030,000Cargo VanW&SS-099525,000525,000Combination Jet/VactorW&SS-10010,00010,000Trailer Mounted WelderW&SS-1011,000,0001,000,000Zenith Avenue ReconstructionW&SS-1031,500,0001,500,000New Public Works FacilityW&SS-104750,000750,000Zane & Lindsey St ReconstructionW&SS-10550,00050,000Pikup TruckW&SS-106550,00050,000 500,000Trunk Sanitary Sewer Repair-TH 100/GlenwoodW&SS-1071,000,0001,000,000Inflow and Infiltraion RehabilationW&SS-1081,500,0001,500,000Glenwood Avenue Watermain RehabilitationW&SS-109150,000150,000TH 55 Underpass Water ImprovementsW&SS-110Water & Sewer Systems Total39,380,0004,705,000 4,000,000 2,820,000 3,995,000 4,425,000 3,645,000 3,350,000 3,900,000 3,440,000 5,100,00025,371,720 25,989,270 29,080,120 11,736,470 17,085,505220,390,150GRAND TOTAL15,417,385 12,428,770 10,047,870 59,251,970 13,981,070 Golden Valley City Council Meeting December 7, 2021 Agenda Item 3. I. Adoption of 2022-2023 Budget for Enterprise, Special Revenue and Internal Service Funds Prepared By Sue Virnig, Finance Director Summary The 2022-2023 Proposed Budgets of the above funds were submitted to the Council in July and August. All budgets were reviewed previously at the Council/Manager meetings in September. The 2023 Budget is approved “in concept” only and will be revised with the budget process in 2022. Detailed budgets are located on the city’s website at http://www.goldenvalleymn.gov/budget. The tab for 2022-23 Proposed Biennial Budget has Sections 24-38 that refer to the budgets above. Financial Or Budget Considerations The supporting documents set the budget for 2022. The budget is a plan that will give departments a guideline to conduct business. Recommended Action Motion to Approve Resolution No. 21-95 Adopting the 2022-2023 Budget for Enterprise, Special Revenue and Internal Services Funds. Supporting Documents • Resolution No. 21-95 (1 page) • Summary Budgets: o Recycling (1 page) o Water & Sewer Utility Maintenance (1 page) o Brookview Golf Course (1 page) o Motor Vehicle Registration (1 page) o Storm Water Utility Maintenance (1 page) o Human Services Commission (1 page) o Brookview Facility (1 page) o Noah Joynes Youth Recreation Fund o DWI Enforcement (1 page) o Violent Offenders Task Force (VOTF)(1 page) o Lodging Tax (1 page) o Vehicle Maintenance (1 page) RESOLUTION NO. 21-95 RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE 2022-2023 BUDGETS FOR ENTERPRISE, SPECIAL REVENUE AND INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS WHEREAS, in 2021, the City Manager presented a biennial budget cycle with a proposed current budget year (2022) and an in concept budget proposal for the second year (2023); and WHEREAS, this proposed 2022 operating budget is submitted by the City in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and other applicable laws in effect on this date; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Golden Valley, Minnesota, that the 2022 Budgets are hereby given final approval. FUND DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 7001 Recycling $1,148,635 7120 Water and Sewer Utility 14,460,290 7150 Brookview Golf Course 3,839,485 7200 Motor Vehicle Licensing 545,630 7300 Storm Sewer Utility 6,622,370 2020 Human Services Fund 78,100 2025 Noah Joynes Youth Recreation Fund 2,000 2040 Brookview Facility 529,245 2010 DWI Fund 15,000 2011 VOTF Fund 4,000 2040 Lodging Tax 0 8200 Vehicle Maintenance 499,120 TOTAL 2022 BUDGET $27,743,875 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, by the City Council that the sources of financing are through user fees, fundraisers, charges for services, and those applicable revenues described in each specific budget. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council declares its intent to take all necessary actions legally permissible to the submission and approval of the City’s budget both proposed and final. Adopted by the City Council of Golden Valley this 7th day of December, 2021. _____________________________ Shepard Harris, Mayor ATTEST: _____________________________ Theresa J. Schyma, City Clerk Golden Valley City Council Meeting December 7, 2021 Agenda Item 4. A. Adoption of 2022-2023 General Fund Budget and Property Tax Levies for Taxes Payable 2022 Prepared By Sue Virnig, Finance Director Summary At this meeting, City Council will consider the resolution adopting the property tax levies for taxes payable 2022 and the 2022 General Fund Budget. The 2023 budget is for future planning purposes and is approved “in concept” only. Staff will present an overview of the 2022 – 2023 budget process. The complete 2022-2023 Proposed General Fund Budget is located on the city website at http://www.goldenvalleymn.gov/budget/index.php. Staff will give a presentation and public input should follow. Financial Or Budget Considerations The supporting documents set the budget for 2022. The budget is a plan that will give departments a guideline to conduct business. Recommended Action • Motion to adopt Resolution No. 21-96 Adopting the 2022 Budget of the General Fund Budget • Motion to adopt Resolution No. 21-97 Adopting the Property Tax Levies for Taxes Payable 2022 Supporting Documents • Resolution No. 21-96 Adopting the 2022 Budget of the General Fund Budget (2 pages) • Resolution No. 21-97 Adopting the Property Tax Levies for Taxes Payable 2021 (1 page) • Proposed 2022-2023 General Fund Budget-Revenue (3 pages) • Proposed 2022-2023 General Fund Budget-Expenditures (2 pages) • Proposed 2022-2023 Fund Balance (1 page) RESOLUTION NO. 21-96 RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE 2022 BUDGET OF THE GENERAL FUND BUDGET WHEREAS, in 2022, the staff presented a biennial budget cycle with a proposed 2021 current budget year and a 2023 “in concept” budget proposal; and WHEREAS, in 2021, the benefit earning employees of the City of Golden Valley receive the dollar amount of the City's contribution for benefits of $1,511.60 per month effective January 1, 2022. The City will also pay the cost of group term life IRS maximum non-taxable level and group long term disability insurance for those employees, and WHEREAS, in 2022, the benefit earning employees of the City of Golden Valley that were classified under Management Team and/or Division Head/Supervisor categories who have been appointed in such designated positions prior to May 1, 2011 will be $1,532.60 per month plus 2% of monthly salary on January 1, 2022. The City will also pay the cost of group term life IRS maximum non-taxable level and group long term disability insurance for those employees, and WHEREAS, in 2022, Employees who successfully participated in the City wellness program in 2021 will receive an additional $20.00 per month in the City's contribution towards benefits, and WHEREAS, Employee service awards are outlined in the Public Purpose Expenditure Policy and shall be considered compensation with IRS regulations, and WHEREAS, in 2022, all City of Golden Valley non-union employees will receive 3% increase in wages and salaries starting January 1, and WHEREAS, this proposed 2022 operating budget resolution and the accompanying proposed tax levies contained in Resolution No. 21-73 are submitted by the City in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and other applicable laws in effect on this date; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Golden Valley, Minnesota, that the 2022 General Fund Budget are hereby given final approval. DIVISION DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 001 Council $458,210 003 City Manager 1,285,825 004 Transfers Out 2,750,000 005 Administrative Services 2,573,030 006 Legal Services 428,045 007 Risk Management 355,000 011 Building Operations 816,045 016 Planning 392,330 018 Inspections 912,335 022 Police 7,178,575 023 Fire 1,843,165 035 Physical Development 350,690 036 Engineering 819,975 037 Streets 2,474,815 066 Park and Recreation Administration 928,445 067 Park Maintenance 1,452,555 068 Park and Recreation Programs 428,550 TOTAL 2022 BUDGET $25,447,590 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, by the City Council that the sources of financing the sums appropriated shall be: DESCRIPTION AMOUNT Ad Valorem Taxes $22,116,855 Licenses 244,165 Permits 963,650 Fed/State Aid/Grants 171,800 Charges for Services 1,473,000 Fines and Forfeitures 125,000 Interest on Investments 150,000 Miscellaneous Revenue 173,120 Transfers In 30,000 TOTAL 2022 BUDGET $25,447,590 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council declares its intent to take all necessary actions legally permissible to the submission and approval of the City’s budget and property tax levies both proposed and final. Adopted by the City Council of Golden Valley, Minnesota this 7th day of December, 2021. _____________________________ Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: _____________________________ Theresa J. Schyma, City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 21-97 RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE PROPERTY TAX LEVIES FOR TAXES PAYABLE 2022 WHEREAS, the City Council has approved the preliminary proposed budget and proposed levy for calendar year 2021 on September 15; and WHEREAS, the proposed budgets require monies to be raised from property taxes on taxable property within the City of Golden Valley. WHEREAS, the debt service levy as established in the bond documents for the General Obligation Bonds, Series 2016C (2822), the amount of $390,771 will not be levied due to the utilization of the franchise fees collected from gas and electric utilities, and WHEREAS, the debt service levy as established in the bond documents for the General Obligation Bonds, Series 2013A (B2891), will contribute the savings of a reduced levy amount of $18,029 will not be levied in 2022 only, and WHEREAS, the debt service levy as established in the bond documents for the General Obligation Bonds, Series 2017B (B3114), the amount of $18,910 will not be levied due to the utilization of the internal state aid monies, and WHEREAS, the debt service levy as established in the bond documents for the General Obligation Bonds, Series 2010A (2807), the amount of $198,754.50 will not be levied due to the full redemption of bonds in 2021, and WHEREAS, the debt service levy as established in the bond documents for the General Obligation Bonds, Series 2011A (2808), the amount of $199,488.76 will not be levied due to the full redemption of bonds in 2021, and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council, that the following sums of money be raised by property tax on taxable property within the City of Golden Valley for taxes payable in 2022 as set out in the 2022-2023 adopted City budgets: General Tax Levy $22,291,855 Bonded Debt Levy: Brookview Center 1,218,300 Street Improvement Bonds 4,417,288 TOTAL Tax Levy $27,927,443 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that said property tax levy be certified to the County Auditor of Hennepin County. Adopted by the City Council of Golden Valley, Minnesota this 7th day of December, 2021. _____________________________ ATTEST: Shepard M. Harris, Mayor _____________________________ Theresa J Schyma City Clerk 2019 2020 2021 2021 2022 2022 2023 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Concept Proposed Concept AD VALOREM TAXES 4011 AD VALOREM TAXES 18,149,133 19,393,128 20,326,285 20,326,285 21,437,750 22,291,855 23,871,695 ALLOWANCE FOR ABATEMENTS/DEL (175,000) (175,000) (175,000) (175,000) (175,000) LESS HOMESTEAD CREDIT 4014 HOMESTEAD CREDIT 4012 PENALTIES & INTEREST 17,744 17,871 TOTAL AD VALOREM TAXES 18,166,877 19,410,999 20,151,285 20,151,285 21,262,750 22,116,855 23,696,695 LICENSES 4023 LICENSE-NEW/USED VEHICLES 4,800 4,800 4,800 4,800 4,800 4,800 4,800 4025 LICENSE-TEMPORARY LIQUOR 900 200 900 200 900 200 200 4026 LICENSE-WINE ON/SALES 13,500 12,460 13,500 10,000 13,500 10,000 10,000 4027 LICENSE-LIQUOR ON/SALE 113,450 91,326 113,450 105,750 113,450 105,750 105,750 4028 LICENSE-LIQUOR OFF SALE 1,000 1,800 1,000 1,600 1,000 1,600 1,600 4029 LICENSE-NONINTOX ON SALE 3,375 3,150 3,375 3,000 3,375 3,000 3,000 4030 LICENSE-NONINTOX OFF SALE 450 1,100 450 600 450 600 600 4031 LICENSE-SUNDAY LIQUOR 3,000 1,639 3,000 2,400 3,000 2,400 2,400 4033 LICENSE-CIGARETTE 5,500 4,050 5,500 4,050 5,500 4,050 4,050 4034 LICENSE-DOG (KENNEL) 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 4038 LICENSE-GARBAGE COLLECTORS 3,300 5,000 3,300 3,300 3,300 3,300 3,300 4041 LICENSE-PEDDLER/SOLICITOR 570 120 570 300 570 300 300 4044 LICENSE-GAS STATION 3,575 4,275 3,575 4,125 3,575 4,125 4,125 4046 LICENSE-APARTMENT 83,960 100,415 83,960 83,960 83,960 83,960 83,960 4048 LICENSE-AMUSE DEVIC 150 90 150 90 150 90 90 4052 LICENSE-HEATING 14,325 10,726 14,325 13,000 14,325 13,000 13,000 4058 LICENSE-MASSAGE 5,740 6,262 5,740 5,740 5,740 5,740 5,740 4059 LICENCE-CHICKEN COOP/RUN 300 575 300 250 300 250 250 TOTAL LICENSES 258,895 248,988 258,895 244,165 258,895 244,165 244,165 PERMITS 4101 PERMIT-BUILDING 835,496 590,965 625,000 625,000 625,000 625,000 625,000 4102 PERMIT-PLUMBING 70,635 65,689 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 4103 PERMIT-SEWER 23,500 14,450 25,000 5,000 25,000 5,000 5,000 4104 PERMIT-HEATING 270,941 222,791 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 4105 PERMIT-WATER 3,100 850 2,500 1,800 2,500 1,800 1,800 4107 PERMIT-STREET EXCAVATING 80,026 82,436 30,000 28,000 30,000 28,000 28,000 4108 PERMIT-FIRE 10,046 20,137 5,000 20,000 5,000 20,000 20,000 4109 PERMIT-BILLBOARD 6,925 2,775 7,500 3,000 7,500 3,000 3,000 4114 PERMIT-TEMPORARY OCCUPENCY 4,000 600 2,000 2,000 4115 PERMIT-REFUNDS(20%) 2,409 822 500 500 500 500 500 4116 PERMIT-GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSI 9,920 7,200 5,000 6,000 5,000 6,000 6,000 4117 PERMIT-TREE PRESERVATION 4,400 1,000 900 1,200 900 1,200 1,200 4119 PERMIT-ELECTRICAL 121,918 73,669 95,000 75,000 95,000 75,000 75,000 4120 PERMIT-FIREWORKS 100 300 100 100 100 100 100 4121 PERMIT-SPECIAL EVENTS 450 75 300 50 300 50 50 4122 ELECTRIC DOCUMENTATION FEE 3,102 18,670 200 13,000 200 13,000 13,000 TOTAL PERMITS 1,446,968 1,102,429 984,000 963,650 984,000 963,650 963,650 FEDERAL GRANTS (1) 4137.1 ARPA GRANT 121,800 4137 CARES MONIES 1,630,153 4137.1 CARES MONIES-HENN CTY 8,065 4131 FEMA GRANT 25,116 4132.1 FED VEST PROGRAM 4132.3 SAFE AND SOBER TOTAL FEDERAL GRANTS - 1,663,334 - - - 121,800 - STATE AID/GRANTS (1) Proposed 2022 - 2023 General Fund Revenue Report City of Golden Valley 2019 2020 2021 2021 2022 2022 2023 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Concept Proposed Concept Proposed 2022 - 2023 General Fund Revenue Report City of Golden Valley 4149 LOCAL PERFORMANCE AID 4150 FIRE POST BOARD TRAINING GRANT 72,520 4,786 11,685 25,000 11,395 25,000 25,000 4151 STATE AID 1,185 - 4152 LOCAL GOVERNMENT AID (LGA) - 4153 POLICE TRAINING 29,415 29,176 27,000 27,000 27,000 25,000 25,000 4153.1 TOWARDS ZERO DEATHS (TZD) 16,854 3,887 - 4153.6 VEST REIMBURSEMENT GRANT 2,339 - TOTAL STATE GRANTS 122,313 37,849 38,685 52,000 38,395 50,000 50,000 COUNTY AID/GRANTS (1) 4173 OTHER COUNTY GRANTS 21,445 - - - TOTAL COUNTY GRANTS - 21,445 - - - - - GENERAL GOVERNMENT 4191 CERTIFICATION FEE 10,530 12,690 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 4194 ADMIN LIQUOR LICENSE 1,000 500 500 500 500 500 500 4196 GENERAL GOVT-GEN SER 7,784 21,452 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 4197 FILING FEES 30 - 10 25 - 15 4200 LIQUOR LICENSE CHECKING 2,900 2,500 2,500 2,200 2,200 2,200 4203 COPY/MAILING FEES 80 21 750 50 4204 DOMESTIC PARTNERSHIP REG 40 - - 40 4207 LEGAL FEES 1,949 100 - - TOTAL GENERAL GOVERMENT 24,313 37,263 21,260 20,315 18,000 20,200 20,215 PUBLIC SAFETY 4226 BRECK TRAFFIC CONTROL 28,933 22,369 28,650 28,650 30,475 28,650 28,650 4228 ALARM ORDINANCE VIOLATION 6,577 3,880 3,700 3,700 3,700 3,700 3,700 4229 SECURITY SERVICES 1,463 - 17,000 - 17,000 4230 POLICE DEPT CHARGES - - SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER-281 102,253 57,616 66,000 - 66,000 - - 4231 FIRE DEPT CHARGES 41,637 850 44,000 850 44,000 850 850 4232 ANIMAL IMPOUND FEES 445 360 1,200 600 1,200 1,200 1,200 4233 ACCIDENT REPORTS 26 3 300 - 100 4237 NUISANCE VIOLATION 2,600 (350) 500 500 . 4239 ANIMAL IMPOUND CONTRACT-RO 3,995 2,660 3,000 3,000 3,000 1,800 1,800 TOTAL PUBLIC SAFETY 187,929 87,388 164,350 37,300 165,475 36,200 36,200 PUBLIC WORKS 4258 PLANNING & ZONING FEES 12,013 8,150 7,500 10,000 7,500 7,500 7,500 4251 CHGS FOR STREET DEPT 34,064 146 8,000 100 8,000 100 100 4253 CHGS FOR PARK DEPT 185 - - 4254 WEED CUTTING 2,765 1,263 3,800 2,000 3,800 3,800 3,800 4255 STREET LIGHT MAINT CHGS 167,027 170,974 160,000 170,000 160,000 175,000 175,000 4256 CHGS FOR ENGINEERING (14,424) (11,386) - - - 4262 CHARGING STATION-CITY HALL 210 - - 75 - TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS 201,840 169,147 179,300 182,175 179,300 186,400 186,400 PARK & RECREATION 4305 MISC INCOME-BROOKVIEW 55 900 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 4307 PICNIC SHELTER RENTAL 30,810 8,710 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 4308 LIQUOR PERMIT-BV 2,050 250 500 500 500 500 500 4309 ATHLETIC FACILITY RENTALS 49,315 36,646 48,000 48,000 48,000 48,000 45,000 4311.1 MEADOWBROOK RENTAL 28,195 9,323 28,000 28,000 28,000 28,000 28,000 4311.2 MEADOWBROOK PROGRAMS 9,757 3,192 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 4314 FINANICAL ASSISTANCE (37) (21) (1,500) (1,500) (1,500) (1,500) (1,500) 2019 2020 2021 2021 2022 2022 2023 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Concept Proposed Concept Proposed 2022 - 2023 General Fund Revenue Report City of Golden Valley 4315 FOOD TRUCK PERMITS 1,550 1,360 1,500 2,000 1,500 1,500 1,500 4316 SPONSORSHIPS - - 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 4317 GV LOGO CLOTHING 1,148 707 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,000 4325.1 ADULT-ATHLETICS 12,590 750 21,600 7,000 21,600 18,000 19,000 4325.2 ADULT SOFTBALL 31,560 20,060 24,500 34,000 35,000 37,000 38,000 4325.3 ADULT-PROGRAMS & EVENTS 39,223 12,413 34,000 34,000 34,000 34,000 35,000 4355.1 YOUTH-ATHLETICS 29,836 12,930 76,000 30,000 76,000 76,000 76,000 4355.2 YOUTH-SUMMER PLAYGROUND 33,217 13,843 35,000 30,000 35,000 46,000 46,000 4355.3 YOUTH-PROGRAM & EVENTS 34,432 10,107 45,000 20,000 45,000 45,000 45,000 4389 FIELD MAINTENANCE FEES 14,480 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 4405.1 SENIOR-PROGRAMS & EVENTS 1,753 567 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,500 4405.2 SENIOR-TRIPS 63,465 3,396 58,000 58,000 58,000 58,000 60,000 TOTAL PARK AND RECREATION 383,399 135,133 420,300 339,700 430,800 440,200 442,200 OTHER FUNDS 4433 CHGS TO CONSTRUCTION FUND 165,998 2,733 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 4434 CHGS TO UTILITY FUND 275,000 275,000 275,000 275,000 275,000 275,000 275,000 4435 CHGS TO BROOKVIEW FUND 85,000 85,000 85,000 85,000 85,000 85,000 85,000 4436 CHGS TO MOTOR VEHICLE FUND 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 4437 CHGS TO RECY FUND 51,500 51,500 51,500 51,500 51,500 75,000 75,000 4438 CHGS TO CEMETARY FUND 1,450 400 4439 HRA TRANS-ADMIN 4440 CHGS TO STORM UTILITY FUND 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 TOTAL OTHER FUNDS 808,948 644,633 766,500 766,500 766,500 790,000 790,000 FINES & FORFEITURES 4155.1 DWI VEHICLE FORFEITURES - - - - - 4155 COURT FINES & FORFEITURES 260,565 148,672 165,000 126,100 165,000 125,000 125,000 TOTAL FINES & FORFEITURES 260,565 148,672 165,000 126,100 165,000 125,000 125,000 INTEREST ON INVESTMENTS 4471 INTEREST ON INVESTMENTS 259,642 232,215 150,000 125,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 INTEREST ON INVESTMENTS 259,642 232,215 150,000 125,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 TRANSFERS IN 4501 PERMANENT TRANS-MOTOR VEH 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 TOTAL TRANSFERS IN 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 OTHER REVENUE 4479 TOWER RENTAL 13,805 15,591 14,820 10,000 14,820 14,820 14,820 4480 BUILDING RENTS -BROOKVIEW GOLF COURSE 127,200 127,200 127,500 127,500 127,200 100,000 100,000 -MOTOR VEHICLE LICENSING 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 -VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 24,000 24,000 24,000 24,000 24,000 24,000 24,000 4478 SPECIAL ASSESS COLL-COUNTY 8,189 13,592 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 4483 CONTRIBUTIONS & DONATIONS 191 1,150 TOTAL OTHER REVENUE 195,385 203,533 194,320 189,500 194,020 166,820 166,820 MISCELLANEOUS COSTS 4476 BURIAL CHARGE-CEMETERY 3,000 1,150 3,000 1,500 3,000 1,500 1,500 4707 PENALTIES-LIQUOR/TOBACCO 1,200 30 4474 SCRAP METAL 3,584 1,914 3,000 2,000 3,000 2,000 2,000 4486 MISCELLANEOUS RECEIPTS 7,082 2,500 1,000 2,500 2,500 2,500 4487 OVER AND SHORT (335) (202) 2019 2020 2021 2021 2022 2022 2023 Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Concept Proposed Concept Proposed 2022 - 2023 General Fund Revenue Report City of Golden Valley 4488 RETURNED CHECK FEE 30 4489 ATM 627 117 300 300 300 300 300 4491 CERTIFICATION FEES 225 TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS COSTS 15,413 3,009 8,800 4,800 8,800 6,300 6,300 GENERAL FUND TOTAL 22,362,487$ 24,176,037$ 23,532,695$ 23,232,490$ 24,651,935$ 25,447,590$ 26,907,645$ 2019 2020 2021 2021 2022 2022 2023 ACTUAL ACTUAL ADOPTED ESTIMATED CONCEPT PROPOSED CONCEPT 001 COUNCIL 1001 COUNCIL $312,987 $301,861 $363,425 $329,115 $361,315 $376,955 $393,515 1002 PEACE COMMISSION 2,100 1,650 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1003 HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION 2,466 1,113 2,000 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 1040 ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION 1,500 1,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 1050 PLANNING COMMISSION - - 3,570 2,595 3,640 3,640 3,725 1060 PARK & OPEN SPACE COMM 670 17 1,100 250 1,100 1,100 1,100 1070 BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS - - 1,145 805 1,145 1,145 1,145 1142 ELECTIONS 23,995 65,001 28,465 33,115 58,970 67,370 44,120 TOTAL DIVISION (001)343,718 371,142 404,205 373,880 434,170 458,210 451,605 003 CITY MANAGER 1030 CITY MANAGER 777,565 940,726 1,082,250 1,081,730 1,143,275 1,285,825 1,373,465 TOTAL DIVISION (003)777,565 940,726 1,082,250 1,081,730 1,143,275 1,285,825 1,373,465 004 TRANSFERS OUT 1025 TRANSFERS OUT 2,207,580 2,567,580 2,717,580 2,717,580 2,800,000 2,750,000 2,850,000 TOTAL DIVISION (004)2,207,580 2,567,580 2,717,580 2,717,580 2,800,000 2,750,000 2,850,000 005 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 1101 GENERAL SERVICES 778,235 829,264 831,600 844,435 837,355 877,235 900,300 1102 ACCOUNTING 297,035 301,353 340,530 316,820 366,035 437,890 466,840 1105 COMPUTER SERVICES 891,996 1,064,922 1,099,300 1,160,050 1,181,370 1,257,905 1,291,370 TOTAL DIVISION (005)1,967,266 2,195,539 2,271,430 2,321,305 2,384,760 2,573,030 2,658,510 006 LEGAL SERVICES 1121 LEGAL SERVICES 181,240 203,749 204,605 226,175 412,965 428,045 441,390 TOTAL DIVISION (006)181,240 203,749 204,605 226,175 412,965 428,045 441,390 007 RISK MANAGEMENT 1115 INSURANCE 316,205 318,902 350,000 350,000 350,000 355,000 360,000 TOTAL DIVISION (007)316,205 318,902 350,000 350,000 350,000 355,000 360,000 011 BUILDING OPERATIONS 1180 BUILDING OPERATIONS 703,237 662,487 753,160 769,785 755,875 816,045 818,300 TOTAL DIVISION (011)703,237 662,487 753,160 769,785 755,875 816,045 818,300 016 PLANNING 1166 PLANNING 346,280 414,321 379,140 380,450 405,110 392,330 423,110 TOTAL DIVISION (016)346,280 414,321 379,140 380,450 405,110 392,330 423,110 018 INSPECTIONS 1162 INSPECTIONS 806,258 749,003 815,655 786,180 845,990 912,335 941,210 TOTAL DIVISION (018)806,258 749,003 815,655 786,180 845,990 912,335 941,210 / PROGRAM DIVISION CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY 2022 - 2023 OPERATING BUDGET 2019 2020 2021 2021 2022 2022 2023 ACTUAL ACTUAL ADOPTED ESTIMATED CONCEPT PROPOSED CONCEPT / PROGRAM DIVISION CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY 2022 - 2023 OPERATING BUDGET 022 POLICE 1300 POLICE ADMINISTRATION 1,048,558 1,235,765 1,265,245 1,248,870 1,517,820 1,736,955 1,775,865 1320 POLICE OPERATIONS 4,595,273 5,003,688 5,154,255 5,153,275 5,816,495 5,441,620 5,990,585 1323 SAFE AND SOBER 16,138 3,178 - - - - - 1324 POLICE SECUITY SERVICE-POTU 6,915 1,456 - - - - - 1130 PROSECUTION AND COURT 262,437 168,523 312,535 300,535 - - - TOTAL DIVISION (022)5,929,321 6,412,610 6,732,035 6,702,680 7,334,315 7,178,575 7,766,450 023 FIRE 1346 FIRE ADMINISTRATION 1,356,343 1,320,993 1,679,195 1,590,320 1,780,660 1,843,165 2,058,780 TOTAL DIVISION (023)1,356,343 1,320,993 1,679,195 1,590,320 1,780,660 1,843,165 2,058,780 035 PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT ADMIN 1400 PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT ADMIN 304,176 328,200 325,220 334,755 332,740 350,690 402,810 TOTAL DIVISION (035)304,176 328,200 325,220 334,755 332,740 350,690 402,810 036 ENGINEERING 1420 GENERAL ENGINEERING 476,549 731,423 609,730 633,605 616,105 819,975 840,025 1452 MISC CONCRETE REPAIR 10,925 - - - - - - TOTAL DIVISION (036)487,474 731,423 609,730 633,605 616,105 819,975 840,025 037 STREETS 1440 STREET MAINTENANCE 1,678,603 1,313,843 1,799,695 1,808,960 1,832,410 1,936,330 2,107,560 1448 SNOW AND ICE CONTROL 334,014 205,641 243,005 239,440 246,985 246,985 240,360 1449 STREET LIGHTS 200,028 233,074 235,000 235,000 235,000 237,500 237,500 1450 TRAFFIC SIGNALS 34,233 29,984 53,000 53,000 53,000 54,000 55,500 TOTAL DIVISION (037)2,246,878 1,782,542 2,330,700 2,336,400 2,367,395 2,474,815 2,640,920 066 PARK AND REC ADMINISTRATION 1600 PARK AND REC ADM 772,488 801,996 859,980 866,145 888,205 928,445 967,060 TOTAL DIVISION (066)772,488 801,996 859,980 866,145 888,205 928,445 967,060 067 PARK MAINTENANCE 1620 PARK MAINTENANCE 1,034,851 1,119,804 1,152,410 1,164,330 1,176,695 1,208,890 1,232,280 1646 TREE MAINTENANCE 172,602 192,036 213,135 227,050 227,700 243,665 246,850 TOTAL DIVISION (067)1,207,453 1,311,840 1,365,545 1,391,380 1,404,395 1,452,555 1,479,130 068 PARK AND REC PROGRAMS ADULT PROGRAMS: 1596 ADULT-ATHLETICS 7,344 1,989 15,800 16,400 15,800 17,785 18,375 1597 ADULT-SOFTBALL 22,721 17,009 29,250 27,140 29,250 31,400 32,400 1680 ADULT-PROGRAMS & EVENTS 34,086 10,928 30,975 30,975 30,975 30,995 31,015 TOTAL ADULT PROGRAMS 64,151 29,926 76,025 74,515 76,025 80,180 81,790 2019 2020 2021 2021 2022 2022 2023 ACTUAL ACTUAL ADOPTED ESTIMATED CONCEPT PROPOSED CONCEPT / PROGRAM DIVISION CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY 2022 - 2023 OPERATING BUDGET YOUTH PROGRAMS: 1660 YOUTH-SUMMER PLAYGROUND 58,305 26,059 67,225 59,325 65,225 80,100 80,100 1670 YOUTH-PROGRAMS & EVENTS 27,046 8,436 55,530 28,680 55,530 55,530 55,530 1673 YOUTH-ATHLETICS 27,873 15,179 54,235 25,935 54,235 54,235 55,960 1679 YOUTH-RINK SUPERVISION 23,235 25,450 25,300 25,300 25,300 25,300 27,300 TOTAL YOUTH PROGRAMS 136,459 75,124 202,290 139,240 200,290 215,165 218,890 SENIOR PROGRAMS: 1691 SENIOR-PROGRAMS & EVENTS 24,179 6,667 30,430 30,430 30,430 30,430 30,925 1694 SENIOR-TRIPS 58,081 5,118 56,200 56,200 56,200 55,700 56,200 TOTAL SENIOR PROGRAMS 82,260 11,785 86,630 86,630 86,630 86,130 87,125 RONALD B DAVIS COMM CTR: 1695 MEADOWBROOK COMM CTR 33,549 37,541 45,820 44,015 45,820 47,075 47,075 TOTAL RONALD B DAVIS COMM C 33,549 37,541 45,820 44,015 45,820 47,075 47,075 TOTAL DIVISION (068)316,419 154,376 410,765 344,400 408,765 428,550 434,880 099 CONTINGENCIES 1900 CONTINGENCIES - 396,343 240,000 - - - - TOTAL DIVISION (099)- 396,343 240,000 - - - - GENERAL FUND TOTAL DIVISIONS 20,269,901 21,663,772 23,531,195 23,206,770 24,664,725 25,447,590 26,907,645 Fund Balance @ 01/01/21 $14,227,049 Estimated Revenue - 2021 $23,232,490 Estimated Expenditures- 2021 23,206,770 Excess of Revenue Over (Under) Expenditures 25,720 Estimated Fund Balance @ 12/31/210 14,252,769 % of 2021 Adopted Expenditures 61.42% Fund Balance @ 01/01/22 $14,252,769 Proposed Revenue - 2022 25,447,590 Proposed Expenditures - 2022 25,731,805 Excess of Revenue Over (Under) Expenditures (284,215) Projected Fund Balance @ 12/31/21 $13,968,554 % of 2022 Proposed Expenditures 54.29% Fund Balance @ 01/01/23 $13,968,554 Concept Revenue - 2023 26,907,645$ Concept Expenditures- 20232 26,907,645 Excess of Revenue Over (Under) Expenditures 0 Proposed Fund Balance @ 12/31/232 13,968,554 % of 2023 Proposed Expenditures 51.91% CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY GENERAL FUND FUND BALANCE ANALYSIS Golden Valley City Council Meeting December 7, 2021 Agenda Item 4. B. Formal Public Hearing – Final Plan for Greenway Villas PUD No. 126 – 7001 Golden Valley Road, Ordinance No. 725 Prepared By Myles Campbell, Planner Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager Summary Ron Clark Construction is seeking approval of a Planning Unit Development (PUD) to construct seven new single-family homes on the northwest-most portion of the Golden Valley Country Club property located at 7001 Golden Valley Road. The PUD would provide flexibility from the subdivision and zoning codes in regard to lot size, building setbacks, and right-of-way width for the proposed roadway. The applicant has stated that these flexibilities are necessary to cluster the 7-home development more tightly, in order to push them back from existing homes along Pennsylvania, preserve more open space across the PUD, and to keep the homes further set back from Bassett Creek. Copies of the site and civil plan materials are included with this executive summary. The Preliminary Plan was previously heard by the Council at its September 9th meeting. Following this approval, the project team began the process of revising their preliminary materials, both to reflect the changes required as condition of approval for the plan, as well to respond to the comments of both the Planning Commission and the City Council. The project team met with City Staff for the code-required PUD Conference, at which time staff confirmed that the conditions of approval from the Preliminary PUD were being met by the applicant. Additional information on the background of this request, the existing site conditions, and the City’s Planned Unit Development procedure can be found in the attached staff memo to the Planning Commission on the Final PUD Plan. This summary will focus on the revisions to the proposal and the principal areas of discussion highlighted by staff, Planning Commission, and neighboring property owners thus far. City Council Regular Meeting Executive Summary City of Golden Valley December 7, 2021 2 Summary of Proposal The applicant is seeking to build seven single- family homes on the 2.13 acre site. In addition to the 7 single-family home lots, two outlots would be created inside the PUD, both providing space for the stormwater management systems, replanting of trees and other vegetation, and in the case of the north outlot, a bike/ped rest area. Floorplans for potential home models are included in the attachments with this memo. Each layout is planned to have two stories: a main level visible from the existing right-of- way and a lower level that would face towards the Country Club and Bassett Creek. Each home would also include an attached garage supporting two cars and storage, either a side- by-side or tandem-style garage. In addition to the concept floorplans, some example exteriors from other projects completed by the applicant are provided with the attachments, to get an idea of the architectural style. Overall the plan has seen some significant changes following the preliminary review cycle. Significant improvements were made to the replacement of trees and use of native landscaping, along with other changes in response to comments from staff and officials. For a more thorough review of the current proposal and the updates made between the Preliminary and Final PUD Plan, please refer to the memo to Planning Commission included as an attachment with this item. Land Use and Zoning Considerations The PUD site is guided for low density residential and zoned for single-family residential (R-1). The proposal for seven single-family homes over 2.13 acres is consistent with the purpose of the zoning district: to provide for single-family detached units. The proposal is also consistent with the intent of the long-term land use guidance and the density range of 1-4 units per acre as described in the Comprehensive Plan. The following flexibilities from the zoning and subdivision code requirements is requested: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 A B City Council Regular Meeting Executive Summary City of Golden Valley December 7, 2021 3 Generally, Planning staff are comfortable with the above reductions in code standards. The change in ROW width was flagged early on in review. In addition to ensuring proper pavement width, ROW is also necessary for the inclusion of both public and private utilities. In this case, however, the reduction in ROW is being managed by the inclusion of oversized drainage and utility easements over the front portion of each lot along the new roadway and an easement over all of outlot A. These easements will effectively act as ROW, allowing buried utilities to be put in place, and for City staff to access and maintain these utilities if needed. As noted above, while the reduction in lot width and area put these new residential properties below the current subdivision standards, this has been done intentionally to preserve larger outlots of open space for reforestation and storm water management systems. The immediate area contains a number of lots with widths below the code required 80 feet, and even less than 60 or 50 feet. As such, the new lots would not appear overly inconsistent with their surroundings. The reduced setbacks for front and side yards are the most significant flexibilities provided from the R-1 zoning district requirements. While only 23’ at they’re closest to the new roadway, most of the homes would be setback further from those on the western side of Pennsylvania than if the site were R-1 District Proposed PUD Subdivision Requirements Minimum Lot Area 10,000 sq. ft. Varies, lot 7 exceeds minimum, lots 1-6 are under. Minimum area is lot 3 at 5,992 sq. ft. Minimum Lot Width 80’, 100’ for corner lots Varies, minimum is lot 6 at 33’ Minimum ROW Width 60’ for local street 40’ District Standards Front yard setback 35’, 30’ for open porch 23’ from curb for all lots, greater on lots 5,6,7 Side yard setback 15’ for lots over 100 feet 12.5’ for lots 65-100 feet Under 65 foot lots: 10% lot width on North & West 20% lot width on South & East No less than 5’ on either side 5’ Side-Street Setback 35’ cannot reduce building envelope to less than 27’ 10’ Rear yard setback 25’ 20’ Side Wall Articulation Side wall longer than 32’ in length must be articulated, with a shift of at least two feet in depth, for at least eight feet in length, for every 32’ of wall. No articulation indicated. City Council Regular Meeting Executive Summary City of Golden Valley December 7, 2021 4 redeveloped using traditional subdivision controls. For lots under 65’ feet in width, a percentage-based setback is typically required between homes, as described in the table above. Alternating based on the side of the home (North & West vs. South & East) provides slightly more space between homes than what is shown here. Two 50’ lots side by side would have a five-foot setback on one side, and a ten foot setback on the other, leaving 15’ total between homes. Here that combined spacing would be reduced to ten feet total. Fire Safety Considerations Staff from the Fire Department had relatively few comments based on the proposal. The street having multiple access points eliminates any need for the Fire Department to determine adequate turning radiuses for their emergency vehicles. Existing public fire hydrants along both Plymouth and Pennsylvania would provide enough range to access all of the proposed homes. Building Inspections staff did note that given the 5’ setback between structures, any type of projection from the homes, such as decorative cornice or roof eaves, would need to be fire rated according to the International Residential Code. This would be confirmed at the time of building permitting. While not required, due to being served by a public roadway, the Fire Chief recommended that the builder consider providing sprinklers to the single-family homes. This could potentially be an option for homebuyers to opt into given that it is not required, so long as the domestic water utility line was sized correctly. Engineering and Environmental Considerations Between the Preliminary and Final PUD Plan, Engineering staff have worked closely with the applicant to ensure that recommend revisions and modifications have been made prior to the submittal of the Final PUD. They note that while there will almost certainly be minor revisions between now and construction, the combined civil plans reflect their own recommendations to the project team, and represent the manner and specifications for streets, utilities that will be used during construction. Those items that remain outstanding are items such as maintenance and access agreements, details as to the schedule of bidding and construction of the public street and utilities, and the review of the grading, drainage, erosion control, and floodplain impacts by the Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission. These items are conditions of approval for the Final PUD Plan, similar to in other recent developments in which such easements and review were required. Their review of the Final PUD Plan raises no concerns however that would cause them to recommend anything other than support for the PUD. Environmental Resources staff have also been central in the review of PUD between preliminary approval and the submittal of the Final PUD, given the fact that this development represents a very significant action within a shoreland area. With the Preliminary PUD, environmental and engineering staff had a number of outstanding questions regarding storm water management, tree replacement and overall grading and landscaping. Those questions have in large part been addressed by the applicant and property owner and the Final PUD represents a major step forward in these regards. Key components which had seen revision following the preliminary approval include: City Council Regular Meeting Executive Summary City of Golden Valley December 7, 2021 5 • A greater effort on replanting trees on-site to replace those lost during construction, and especially to reforest the highly visible corner at Plymouth and Pennsylvania with a diverse mix of native and ornamental species. o 91% of mitigation requirements being met with onsite planting • Revisions to the stormwater management plan to route all runoff through a two-part system (eliminating the off-site vault to the east) that provides water quality treatment via infiltration in addition to rate control. This includes capturing and treating stormwater from portions of Plymouth Avenue and Pennsylvania Avenue that runoff into the PUD. • Reworking grades to flatten out slopes and eliminate a large retaining wall near the creek. • Use of native grasses and vegetation in shoreland areas near Bassett Creek and in common areas of the PUD • Reduction in the footprint and use of the irrigation system needed to serve the development • The dedication of conservation easements, both over sections of the PUD within the shoreland setback, and over Country Club property in between the Creek and PUD. While some aspects of these plans will still be subject to review by the Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission, environmental staff are comfortable with the current plans in regard to their preservation and protections of nearby natural resources. City Council Regular Meeting Executive Summary City of Golden Valley December 7, 2021 6 Public Amenity Evaluation The PUD Public Amenity Point System was added to the City’s PUD requirements in 2015 to better quantify the values of various public amenities that could be provided by an applicant in order to balance concessions from the zoning and subdivision code allowed by the City. In order to meet the requirement, a PUD must provide one or more amenities whose value adds up to at least 5 points. The table below outlines the Amenities identified by the applicant, their value, and any suggested modifications to points provided by staff. Amenity Description Value Proposed Amenity Enhanced bicycle and pedestrian facilities - Eligible facilities may include a combination of the following: heated transit shelter, bicycle repair tools, rest area, wayfinding signs, sheltered walkway, woonerf, and other amenities that increase the convenience and encourage the use of public walkways and bikeways beyond what is otherwise required in the underlying zoning district. 2 Rest area on Outlot A. Pair of covered benches and bike parking provided off of the sidewalk along Pennsylvania. Native vegetation and trees surrounding, with a view east into the prairie area above the underground stormwater system. Electric car charging station - An electric vehicle charging station accessible to residents, employees, and/or the public providing connections at the rate of five percent of the required parking spaces. 1 2 homes would have electric vehicle stations installed already, the remaining homes would have the stations roughed in but not installed (able to be added by future owner). 2 homes exceeds the 5% of minimum required parking (2 spaces per dwelling, 5% of 14 spaces is 1 space rounded up). Enhanced Vegetation - A landscaping plan prepared by a licensed landscape architect that provides exceptional design with a variety of pollinators and native trees, shrubs, and plant types that provide seasonal interest and that exceed minimum City standards. 1 Revised landscape plan includes a much greater focus on native grasses, plant species, and trees Vegetation is being used strategically in areas of steeper slopes to prevent erosion over time, large open spaces are dedicated to provide space for landscaping, the irrigation system was reduced, and a conservation easement is provided over both the portions of the PUD with steeper slopes and nearer to Bassett Creek. Green Path Advanced Certification - Homes would be constructed to the energy and environmental standards of the Minnesota Green Path Advanced Certification Program. 1* Additional details on the program are provided by the applicant and are attached to this memo. Generally, the Advanced Certification states to be 50% more energy efficient than a typical new build home today, and the homes shown in the preliminary plan would also qualify for LEED Silver. City currently only awards 3 points to LEED Gold and 4 points for LEED Platinum. *Petitioned Amenity Point City Council Regular Meeting Executive Summary City of Golden Valley December 7, 2021 7 Originally the applicant had proposed to include some type of public art with this PUD project. An early suggestion by staff had been the use of plaques providing local history of either the Creek or indigenous communities in the area. Additional options included sculptures or art incorporated into the seating and bike parking. Overall this amenity was not warmly received by either Planning Commission or City Council, and so the applicant refocused their efforts on Outlot A to provide a modest bike/ped rest area that would not disrupt the neighborhood and a more robust landscaping/tree replacement plan for the area to create a natural feel. Environmental staff agreed with the revised landscaping plan meeting the standards for enhanced vegetation, especially given the dedication of a conservation easement over the entirety of Outlot B and the shoreland setback area, which would ensure that the native vegetation in these areas would be required to remain in place for perpetuity. Otherwise, the applicant is still seeking amenity points for the previously discussed electric vehicle charging stations inside the homes, the enhanced bicycle and pedestrian facilities for the rest area, and a petition for one amenity point for the homes being built to the Advanced Certification requirements of the Minnesota Green Path program. Previously with the public art piece, the petitioned points from this last item would not be required, however with the revisions to the PUD plan, at least 1 point is needed to meet the 5 point minimum. In the Preliminary PUD memo, staff noted they would only be comfortable awarding 1 point for this certification, given that it did not provide the same degree of efficiency requirements of LEED Platinum or Gold, which are identified in the PUD code. Staff’s thoughts on the program are unchanged. While there is value to the additional requirements it places on the construction, and this added efficiency is in line with goals of the Comprehensive Plan to exceed efficiency minimums, it is less than that of those LEED programs identified in code, and therefore should be awarded a lower point value. Discussion at Planning Commission The staff memo to Planning Commission as well as the relevant minutes from the informal public hearing are provided for the City Council to review in full. At its meeting on November 8th, 2021 the Planning Commission held an informal public hearing on the Final PUD Plan. The meeting did not see any resident comments on the plan in person, although a previous comment on the Preliminary PUD had been forwarded to Commissioners. While supportive of the changes made by the applicant following the preliminary PUD, Planning Commission remained unsupportive of the plan in general, and the use of the property for residential purposes more broadly. After presentations by staff and the applicant, and their own discussion, Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend denial of the application to City Council, 7-0. The Commissioners referred to the findings listed in section 113-123 (c)(2) and found the application failed to meet the findings required to approve a PUD: Quality Site Planning • Reduction in width and layout of lots 6+7 are not well planned • Desire for a more significant conservation easement • Desire to see tree mitigation fully met on-site instead of 91% • Location of the street access on Plymouth being too close to the intersection, raising safety concerns City Council Regular Meeting Executive Summary City of Golden Valley December 7, 2021 8 Preservation • Similar comments regarding the desire for a larger conservation easement to be dedicated and additional tree replacement to occur to off-set the loss of existing trees o Critical of the emphasis on restoration of trees vs. preservation outright • Desire to have seen the previously included eastern outlot used for additional preservation efforts Efficient; Effective • Commissioners questioned whether the 5-foot side yard setback led to more efficient use of the land Consistency • 28’ wide street is inconsistent with the 26’ wide city standard • Homes would be inconsistent with surrounding residential properties due to being more expensive • While meeting some Comprehensive Plan Goals, the development also contradicted other goals in the Parks and Natural Resources Chapter General Health • Loss of natural biome impacts plants and animals in the area Meets Requirements • Commissioners were unsupportive of the bike/ped facility and did not support the petition for points for Green Path Advanced Certification, felt the PUD did not meet the public amenity requirement Commissioners noted that they were initially against rezoning the property and the preliminary plan, and that they remained unsupportive of housing at this location. They additionally had a number of comments on the proposed public amenities of the project and felt that these did not offset the alterations being allowed via the PUD process, albeit while meeting the 5 point requirement of code. Some of this disappointment was directed at the amenity point system itself, given that this was the first opportunity to see the system used. Commissioners had some discussion on whether this point system would need to be revisited for potential amendment. PUD Benefit vs. Traditional Subdivision Given that the public benefit of the PUD was a major area of discussion at Planning Commission, staff wanted to address the benefits and tradeoffs of this approach compared to a traditional subdivision. As was discussed with Planning Commission and City Council at the time of the site’s rezoning, being zoned for residential use made the property available for redevelopment either via the PUD process or via traditional subdivision. The two approaches offer different paths towards redevelopment and can be generalized as having different focuses. Traditional subdivision creates lots that meet the typical City Council Regular Meeting Executive Summary City of Golden Valley December 7, 2021 9 standards of the City Code, focusing on conformity with these design standards. The PUD process can allow for development that differs from the letter of the code, with the intention being that this development better incorporates with neighboring land uses, natural resources, and City policies and priorities. While a PUD is required by code to provide a minimum of five points of public amenity items, these items typically do not represent the whole benefit of a Planned Unit Development. For one, the City has a much greater degree of oversight and control over a PUD compared to subdivision. Subdivision code is structured to ensure minimum compliance with site standards and to ensure that the added development capacity does not overextend public utilities. Beyond these minimum requirements there is less opportunity for design input or in how the development might fit with City objectives. A PUD allows staff and Council to push harder for items such as planting native vegetation, tree replacement onsite with a diverse mix of species, easement dedication, and use of low impact design. In both cases the minimum standards apply (for example the same amount of trees need to be replaced one way or another), but only for a PUD can the City negotiate for improvements beyond those minimum standards (prioritizing replacement on-site versus fee payment). In terms of improvements with this particular PUD, staff would point to the aforementioned public amenities (bike/ped area, native landscaping, vehicle charging capacity, and energy efficiency certification), the preservation of larger open space parcels, the added buffer between new and existing homes, 91% of trees being replanted on-site, and the dedication of conservation easements in the areas in and around Bassett Creek. In most cases these were items advocated for by the Planning Commission, City Council, and staff as public benefits to offset the looser lot and structure restrictions. That said, the PUD route also has its tradeoffs. As mentioned, one of the principal benefits of traditional subdivision is that it sets hard standards for lot widths and area that result in congruent lots. And because it does not set atypical standards for structures, the eventual homes would match those found in other parts of the City. This conformity does provide consistency between homes in and outside the development. Another significant difference between this PUD and a subdivision is the inclusion of a new roadway. There are the benefits of this design in regard to traffic safety and reducing the visual impact of the development, however by locating homes directly along Plymouth and Pennsylvania there is potential to reduce overall hard surface, or potentially preserve more trees. A critical point here though is that while subdivision could reduce the need for tree mitigation, this is wholly dependent on the development plans submitted, which could call for similar levels of tree removal, and without the same degree of on-site replacement as we see here. At the time of the rezoning, staff had examined the site and determined it could likely support 6-7 units via traditional subdivision, again with lots having direct access from Plymouth and Pennsylvania. The density of units therefore would not change between either option, but rather the use of land. Additional area would need to be dedicated to individual lots in order to meet the 10,000 sq.ft. minimum, eliminating the outlots shown in the plan. The same minimum requirements in regard to City Council Regular Meeting Executive Summary City of Golden Valley December 7, 2021 10 tree replacement, utility impacts, and stormwater runoff control would be in effect, however with less capacity to negotiate on these items. Staff is comfortable with however housing may be pursued at this site; the key difference up for consideration is in what ways they do or do not impact surrounding properties. Subdivision offers a more predictable style of development but also likely means a greater difference from the existing site, with homes being prominent along Plymouth and Pennsylvania Aves. The PUD reduces the amount of land dedicated to each private home lot in an effort to preserve more contiguous open space at the intersection and around the Creek. Any type of residential development here would be a change from the existing conditions, however staff feels that the route of the PUD best mitigates the impact of this change on the surrounding neighborhood. Findings In order to approve or deny the Preliminary PUD, the City Council must be able to make findings that support its position. The following findings were initially drafted to support approval and could be used if a vote to approve the Preliminary PUD is advanced: Quality Site Planning. The PUD plan must be tailored to the specific characteristics of the site and achieve a higher quality of site planning and design than generally expected under conventional provisions of the zoning chapter. Standard Met. The Final PUD Plan is much improved in regard to its management and planning around the critical natural resources on and near the site. As in the Preliminary Plan, individual lots have a decreased footprint in the PUD in order to preserve large open space outlots. With revisions to the grading and landscaping plans, these outlots contain additional trees and native plant species to maximize their value as green space. The removal of the outlot to east shown in the preliminary plans is an improvement in staff’s eyes, given its original underutilization. The decision to include a new public road connection, while creating some challenges for the developer in coordinating with the city for its construction, ultimately makes this a better plan for it. The new roadway would remove the need for multiple access points along Pennsylvania that could create hazards to traffic, while also creating additional spacing between the new homes and those on the west side of Pennsylvania. The homes themselves utilize the lots topography in order to include a lower level walkout, while keeping the front façade of the home along the street at a single-story. Preservation. The PUD plan must preserve and protect substantial desirable portions of the site’s characteristics, open space, and sensitive environmental features including steep slopes, trees, scenic views, creeks, wetlands, and open waters. Standard Met. Protection of Bassett Creek is evident from the layout of the plan overall and in the short term based on its Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan. While stormwater is being managed via underground systems, both systems are providing infiltration in order to meets City and Watershed standards. In addition, while aboveground systems provide external value in providing natural habitat, the applicant is utilizing a mix of prairie grasses City Council Regular Meeting Executive Summary City of Golden Valley December 7, 2021 11 over the area of each underground system, in order to get at that habitat benefit, albeit providing an alternative natural environment than an open pond. These underground systems will end up catching all runoff from hardcover on the site, whether that is coming from the private residential lots, the new public street connection, or portions of Plymouth Avenue and Pennsylvania Avenue that flow into the PUD. A major improvement over the preliminary plan is the reforestation occurring on both of the open space outlots, in addition to the overall increase in native landscaping, grasses, and shrubs. While the redevelopment activity leaves little opportunity for preservation of mature trees, forestry staff are supportive of the replanting efforts, which should result in a much greater diversity of high-quality species on-site. Native vegetation is being used strategically in areas of steeper slopes and within the shoreland setback area in order to stabilize soils and prevent erosion. Whereas the preliminary plan included widespread use of Kentucky bluegrass sod, the revisions to the landscaping plan show these non-native grasses only in select areas: around the curb of Outlot A for mowing, and on some of the residential lots. No bluegrass sod is being shown within the shoreland setback, even on those residential lots that intersect this setback. This also reduces the footprint and the use of the irrigation system. During the preliminary PUD review, environmental staff flagged the lack of a platted connection with Bassett Creek as atypical for subdivision and recommended that a conservation easement be provided over this area between the PUD and the Creek to the South. In collaboration with the developer and the Golden Valley Country Club, conservation easements will be placed on those areas of the PUD that fall within the shoreland setback, over the entirety of Outlot B, and also on a portion of the Country Club property to the centerline of Bassett Creek. This conservation easement, while designed to not restrict the playability of the golf course areas it might cover, will ensure that native vegetations will remain in place long-term and that the public water will be protected. The easement would also restrict new aboveground structures, and require City approvals for any changes to the natural environment. The dedication of this easement was a critical aspect of City environmental staff’s approval of the Final PUD Plan. Efficient; Effective. The PUD plan must include efficient and effective use of the land (which includes preservation). Standard Met. Given the proximity to Bassett Creek, the decision to cluster homes closer together and provide larger sections of open space makes sense. With the Final PUD Plan, these preserved open spaces have been further improved by additional reforestion and replanting of vegetation that would be impacted during construction. As noted above, the removal of the eastern outlot from the plans is in response to staff comments on the Preliminary PUD. The outlot previously was underutilized as part of the PUD, and removing it leaves that area for use in a potential future subdivision. The applicant reworked the southern outlot to include additional area, which is now being used for reforestation efforts, and which will be covered under the aforementioned conservation easement, providing much greater public benefit than the original plan. City Council Regular Meeting Executive Summary City of Golden Valley December 7, 2021 12 Consistency. The PUD plan must result in development that is compatible with adjacent uses and consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and redevelopment plans and goals. Standard Met. In terms of consistency with adjacent uses, staff finds the Preliminary Plan to fit well. Other than the Country Club, the site is surrounded by single-family zoned properties. Existing lots in the area range in width from 50-100+ feet, and while these new homes would have reduced setbacks from one another, the PUD overall would represent a housing unit density of just over three units per acre. This is within the 1-4 units guided by the Low Density Land Use Category and comparable to that of the surrounding area. Additional steps have been taken by the applicant to diminish the impacts of new homes in the area as well, such as pulling them off Plymouth and not including a second story. Staff generally finds the proposal consistent with Comprehensive Plan. Given that the Golf Course was not discussed for redevelopment as part of the Comprehensive Plan, staff is instead reliant on that document’s Goals and Policies. 1. Land Use, Goal 4, Objective 1.4 - Work with developers to provide permanent open space and park areas in development plans and to integrate native species 2. Land Use, Goal 4, Objective 2.3 - Use Planned Unit Developments to allow for flexibility in site design when needed to preserve vegetation or other sensitive site features or to re- introduce natural areas 3. Housing, Goal 2 - Expand the variety of housing types and designs to allow all people a housing choice for all life stages and all economic means 4. Housing, Goal 4, Objective 1 - Ensure new housing developments meet or exceed energy efficiency standards, and implement sustainable design features where possible 5. Parks & Natural Resources, Goal 3, Objective 1.2 - Review development proposals for conformance with ordinances regarding tree preservation, water quality, wetland protection and mitigation, and shoreland protection 6. Water Resources, Goal 1, Objective 3.2 - Minimize the rate and volume of stormwater runoff entering Bassett Creek 7. Water Resources, Goal 4, Objective 1.3 - Regulate stormwater runoff discharges and volumes to minimize flood risk, flood damages, and the future costs of stormwater management systems General Health. The PUD plan must be consistent with preserving and improving the general health, safety, and welfare of the people of the city. Standard Met. The planned storm water management for the site would provide infiltration and rate control for all stormwater runoff created within the PUD. A greater degree of trees are being replaced on-site, and with greater biodiversity than what had existed previously. The new roadway reduces traffic conflict points along Pennsylvania Avenue, and city engineers are not concerned with the increase in vehicle traffic that could be expected from seven new single-family homes. With the homes set back from Pennsylvania, and presenting as a single story from the ROW, staff believes they have been planned and designed in order to fit with the existing residential neighborhood, despite reductions to setbacks and lot width. City Council Regular Meeting Executive Summary City of Golden Valley December 7, 2021 13 Meets Requirements. The PUD plan must meet the intent and purpose provisions of Section 113-123 as well as all other provisions. The purpose and intent of the Planned Unit Development code chapter reads, “It is the intent of this section to provide an optional method of regulating land use which permits flexibility from the other provisions of the City Code, including flexibility in uses allowed, setbacks, height, parking requirements, number of buildings on a lot, and similar regulations in exchange for public benefit in the form of amenities.” Generally, staff feels the plans for this development follow the intent of the PUD code. Areas where flexibilities are being requested (setbacks, ROW, lot size) are all allowed under the PUD code, and the amenities being proposed are consistent with those highlighted by the City in code. The improvements made between the Preliminary and Final PUD Plan were responsive to both the requests of staff as well as the discussion and critique provided during the Planning Commission and City Council’s review of the original plans. Financial Or Budget Considerations This approval includes a requirement for a park dedication fee to be made to the City prior to the formal release of the plat. Staff is confirming with County Assessor’s what that dollar amount should be for 6% of the land value. Additionally, the new houses would represent a potential increase for the overall City tax base. Recommended Action Staff recommends the City Council move to approve Ordinance No. 725 and the Final Plan for Golden Valley Country Club Villas PUD No. 126, based on the findings above, staff recommends the approval be subject to the following conditions: 1. The plans prepared by Ron Clark Construction, dated November 3 and 4, 2021, shall become part of this approval. 2. The plans are subject to the review and approval of the Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission. 3. The required park dedication fee shall be paid prior to the release of the final plat. 4. The Final Plat shall include “PUD No. 126” in its title. 5. Final Construction Plans and cost estimates for the site and public improvements must be submitted to the City for review and approval. 6. Details as to the construction of site and public improvements shall be finalized prior to the consideration of approval of the development agreement and final plat, and are subject to the approval of the City Engineer. a) Plans shall be revised to show the public street, Greenway Pass, to be no more than 26 feet in width. 7. All required easements and agreements shall be dedicated or executed prior to the release of the final plat, including but not limited to drainage and utility easements, public use and access easements, development agreement, escrow and deposit agreement for public improvements, and conservation easements. 8. The impervious surface area on each of the residential lots shall be limited to listed square footage in the plans dated November 4, 2021, in order to preserve open space within the City Council Regular Meeting Executive Summary City of Golden Valley December 7, 2021 14 shoreland area and to remain consistent with the stormwater calculations that determined the design of the stormwater management facilities. 9. Homes within the PUD will be restricted to a single story above grade as measured from the front yard, with a maximum height of 25 ft. 10. Overhead power adjacent to and within the development must be buried as well as all utilities serving the site; joint trench for private utilities is preferred to maximize efficient use of the right-of-way. 11. Sanitary sewer main in Pennsylvania Avenue must be lined for I&I compliance and any existing sanitary sewer stubs to the site must be abandoned. 12. Applicant shall submit HOA documents and all other private declarations of covenants, conditions, restrictions, and easements for the development prior to approval of the final plat. Supporting Documents • Memo to the Planning Commission dated November 8, 2021 (15 pages) • Approved Planning Commission minutes dated November 8, 2021 (6 pages) • Applicant Narrative (7 pages) • Plan Sets (survey, site plan, landscaping, etc.) (23 pages) • Concept Floor Plans (4 pages) • Greenpath Program Information (8 pages) • Ordinance No. 725 (3 pages) 1 Date: November 8, 2021 To: Golden Valley Planning Commission From: Myles Campbell, Planner Subject: Informal Public Hearing – Final Plan for Golden Valley Country Club Villas PUD No. 126 – 7001 Golden Valley Road Property address: 7001 Golden Valley Road Property owner: Golden Valley Country Club Applicant: Ron Clark Construction Lot size: 2.13 acres Zoning district: Single‐Family Residential (R‐1) Future land use: Low Density Residential Current use: Open Space Proposed use: Low Density Residential Adjacent uses: Golf Course (East and South); Single‐Family Residential (North and West) 2020 aerial photo (Hennepin County) 2 Summary Ron Clark Construction is seeking approval of a Planning Unit Development (PUD) to construct seven new single‐family homes on the northwestly portion of the Golden Valley Country Club property located at 7001 Golden Valley Road. The PUD would be necessary due to the design of the individual home lots, which are more compact than what is allowed by code, as well as the inclusion of a communal open space towards the existing street intersection. Background City staff were first approached by the Country Club in late 2019 about the potential redevelopment for portions of their 148+ acre property. The Club had identified areas of the property which were not used for active play on the golf course and which could be sold to a development partner to generate additional revenue. This site in the northwest corner of the lot was first marketed to builders and investors in late Spring of 2020, following which the Club selected Ron Clark Construction to partner with on the redevelopment. Given the size of the proposed parcel, and the surrounding residential neighborhood, the Club and Ron Clark were looking to develop the area as a single‐family subdivision. This project has come before the Planning Commission twice previously for related approvals to this Final PUD Plan. At its April 12th meeting, the Planning Commission held an informal public hearing on the rezoning and reguiding of the land, which would be required to redevelop the site with anything other than institutional uses. The Planning Commission had a split vote (3‐2) to recommend denial of these changes. The change in land use would subsequently go before City Council and receive approval. This approval was affirmed after external review by the Metropolitan Council. The project returned to Planning Commission on August 23rd, this time for the Preliminary PUD Plan. Here the PUD procedure would set the standards for development of the new lots, as well as act as the subdivision for the 7 residential parcels and 2 outlots. Staff had recommended approval of the Preliminary Plan, however Planning Commissioners made the necessary findings to demonstrate that the proposed plan did not satisfy the standards of approval for a PUD, most notably in regard to the Preservation standard. Commissioners were critical of the loss of trees on‐ site, as well as being concerned over the proximity to Bassett Creek and what protections were being put in place for this water body. Commissioners ultimately voted 6‐0 to recommend denial of the Preliminary PUD Plan to Council. The Preliminary Plan went before City Council on September 9th. Staff outlined three actions the Council could take on the item: approval, denial, or to return the Preliminary Plan to the Planning Commission for a second round of review. The Council ultimately elected to approve the Preliminary PUD Plan on a 3‐1 vote. This type of reversal after a unanimous vote at Planning Commission is atypical from usual procedure and practice. Planning Commissioners did reach out after the Council meeting to ask for clarity on the vote. In large part the Council decision seems to reflect the fact that the applicant, after appearing at Planning Commission, had already begun 3 making significant improvements to their plans in regards to the replacement of trees on‐site, the use of native vegetation wherever possible, and a renewed focus on protecting the Creek to the south. In addition, City Council also had the benefit of hearing from the Country Club, the other private partner in this development, who provided additional background as to why they were seeking to dispose of property. The Council felt comfortable with the plans in their current state, understanding that the applicant would need to return to Planning Commission for the Final PUD Plan approval regardless. Since the approval of the Preliminary PUD Plan, Ron Clark, their project team, and representatives from the Golden Valley Country Club have been in the process of revising their preliminary materials, both to reflect the changes required as condition of approval for the plan, as well to respond to the comments of both the Planning Commission and the City Council. The project team met with City Staff for the code‐required PUD Conference, at which time staff confirmed that the conditions of approval from the Preliminary PUD were being met by the applicant. Existing Conditions The proposed redevelopment area is approximately 2.13 acres in size, slightly reduced from the Preliminary Plan that included a third outlot to the East. The proposed PUD would be located in the southeast quadrant of the Pennsylvania and Plymouth Ave intersection. As noted in the request summary, the site is surrounded on its south and east sides by the golf course, with other existing single‐family residential properties across both public rights‐of‐way. There are no other land use types in the immediate area until you get further south along Pennsylvania to Calvary Lutheran Church. There are currently no structures of any kind located on this portion of the Country Club property; the site is identified as forested area in the City’s natural resources inventory. This wooded area along Bassett Creek is part of a 'Green Corridor' and is shown in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, Parks and Natural Resources Chapter. A tree inventory has been completed for the site; 229 trees in total were identified, with 165 of them being considered significant trees, and four being considered legacy trees under City Code. A full copy of the Tree Inventory is included with the attachments of this memo. This inventory also provides details on the types of trees found by the project team. The site contains many desirable tree species including walnut, cherry, pine, elm, hackberry, maple/boxelder, and oak; as well as the predominant species on site, Black Locust. While still considered a significant tree by City Code, Black Locust was added in 2017 to the Minnesota Department of Agriculture’s noxious weeds classification, due to its capacity to outcompete native tree species. This new piece of information since the Preliminary PUD Plan has been accounted for by City Forestry and Environmental Resources staff. However, for the time being, it remains a significant tree by code and requires replacement. 4 Other environmental factors to note include the site’s topography and proximity to Bassett Creek. Based on City mapping records, the site’s highest elevations can be found closest to the street intersection in the northwest corner of the potential parcel, and that elevation then drops as you move south along Pennsylvania and east along Plymouth. This topography has significant impacts when planning for storm water management in order to avoid allowing untreated stormwater runoff from entering the creek, and in planning for areas of steeper slopes in the shoreland area. The elevation is sufficient to keep the majority of the site above the modeled floodway for Bassett Creek, which is located just to the southeast of the development area. Part of the southern outlot would fall in this area. The majority of the PUD would fall within the Shoreland Management Area, which is defined in City Code as 300 feet from a creek or stream. At time of the Final Plan no structures are proposed to fall within 50 feet from the Creek’s Ordinary High Water Level, which is the setback required by code. Being within the shoreland area however, requirements regarding the removal and replacement of vegetation, or filling and grading activities, would be triggered. Additional review is required by the Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission (BCWMC) prior to commencement of any work on site. The Watershed district will principally be reviewing for erosion and sediment control, but also to ensure no change or impacts to the modeled floodway. 5 Summary of Proposal The applicant is seeking to build seven single‐family homes on the 2.13 acre site. In addition to the 7 single‐family home lots, two outlots would be created inside the PUD, both providing space for the stormwater management systems, replanting of trees and other vegetation, and in the case of the north outlot, a bike/ped rest area. Floorplans for potential home models are included in the attachments with this memo. Each layout is planned to have two stories: a main level visible from the existing right‐of‐way and a lower level that would face towards the Country Club and Bassett Creek. Each home would also include an attached garage supporting two cars and storage, either a side‐by‐side or tandem‐style garage. In addition to the concept floorplans, some example exteriors from other projects completed by the applicant are provided with the attachments, to get an idea of the architectural style. As mentioned during the preliminary review, these homes are being marketed as low‐maintenance properties: small yards to maintain, and an HOA to handle landscaping, common areas, and snow removal. To the first end, the PUD is required in order to plat lots at sizes smaller than required for a new subdivision. The minimum lot size in R‐1 zoning district is 10,000 square feet. Only one of the seven home lots would be above this threshold, with the average lot size being roughly 7,788 square feet. Despite the smaller lot size and reduced setbacks in‐between homes, this development would still fall within the guided density ranges from the Comprehensive Plan for low‐density residential (1‐4 units per acre). This is due to shifting the excess land to open space outlots. Their smaller size, while not allowed today, puts them in line to comparable lots in the area that were platted in the City’s past. The Winnetka Addition (1916) to the west and Belmont Addition (1915) to the east both feature a range of lot sizes including small lots at widths of 40, 50, and 60 feet. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 A B 6 The PUD also allows for reduced front setbacks, at the smallest 23’ back from the curb of the road. This reduced setback is partially mitigated however due to the applicant’s decision to plat a new public roadway to serve these homes. As a result, while having a short setback from the new road, the homes would have greater separation from those on the west side of Pennsylvania, including the landscaped Outlot A, to provide additional privacy for both current and potential residents. Another benefit of the new roadway is removing individual lot accesses and curb cuts from Pennsylvania. A 2013 traffic count along Pennsylvania, north of the Plymouth intersections counted 733 average daily trips. While not an overly large number, the roadway does drop in grade south of Plymouth, and residents at previous public hearings have noted a tendency for drivers to speed in this area. Instead of up to 7 curb cuts along Pennsylvania, the new roadway would result in one new curb cut, limiting the potential for traffic accidents. If constructed to meet City Code and engineering standards, the street would be considered public and could therefore be maintained by the City in terms of snow removal, sweeping, repaving, etc. The watermain, sanitary sewer, and storm sewers located under the public street, as well as any street lighting serving the development, could also be owned and maintained by the City if constructed to meet City standards. There would also be some buried private utilities and services located within the street corridor and throughout the development to serve the new units. The area to the west of this new street would be maintained as Outlot A under the PUD. The area would contain the first of two underground storm water management systems on the site. This portion of the site is one of the few that has soils suitable for infiltration, and the runoff generated from roofs, driveways, etc. would all be directed to this first underground chamber. The layout of Outlot A, and its amenities were modified heavily in between the Preliminary and Final PUD Plan in response to comments by the Planning Commission, City Council, and feedback from neighbors. Based on this feedback, no public art pieces are being proposed as part of the project; instead, the focus will be on a public bike/ped rest area overlooking a mix of native prairie landscaping and restored woodland. This section of Pennsylvania is identified in the City’s bike/ped plan as a signed bike route, connecting the Luce Line Trail to the south with the Pennsylvania Woods area to the north. The removal of public art is based on discussion with City officials and hearing from residents that they did not want a major art piece drawing too many people to an otherwise residential neighborhood. The bike/ped rest area and landscaping amenities would be maintained by the eventual HOA, and as such would require access and maintenance agreements with the City to ensure their quality and usability into the future. Outlot B (formerly Outlot C) would contain the second underground storm water system. It would take captured stormwater from the first vault system, provide some additional infiltration and filtration, and release it slowly over time according to the City’s rate/runoff controls. Also in the area of the underground system, the second outlot would include a number of replanted trees and a mix of native vegetations instead of sod, given its proximity to Bassett Creek. The entirety of this outlot would fall under a pair of easements: a conservation easement to ensure the long‐term preservation of native vegetation, and a drainage and utility easement so that the City’s public works staff can access City infrastructure and provide inspections on the private storm system. 7 Additional amenities proposed by the applicant include electric car vehicle charging stations. In order to qualify for the associated amenity point, stations must be provided at a rate of 5% of the overall required parking spaces within the PUD. Code requires two spaces per dwelling unit, meaning that with a minimum of 14 off‐street parking spaces for the homes, only one would need to be a charging station. The applicant is also seeking PUD amenity credit for building these homes according to the guidelines of the Minnesota Greenpath Certification program. Additional details on this program are provided with the application materials. This program is similar to LEED in that it encourages greater energy and environmental efficiencies in new buildings, however it to a lesser degree of impact than LEED Gold, which is identified in the City Code as an Amenity feature. Greenpath Advanced Certification would be required for the seven new homes. To give an idea of what this certification would require, the homes would need to be inspected and tested after construction and achieve an energy efficiency greater than 50% of a home built using the state energy code today, and 70% more efficient than an older home being resold today. This is at a rate comparable to LEED Silver. Land Use and Zoning Considerations The PUD site is guided for low density residential and zoned for single‐family residential (R‐1). The proposal for seven single‐family homes over 2.13 acres is consistent with the purpose of the zoning district: to provide for single‐family detached units. The proposal is also consistent with the intent of the long‐term land use guidance and the density range of 1‐4 units per acre as described in the Comprehensive Plan. The following flexibilities from the zoning and subdivision code requirements is requested: R‐1 District Proposed PUD Subdivision Requirements Minimum Lot Area 10,000 sq. ft. Varies, lot 7 exceeds minimum, lots 1‐6 are under. Minimum area is lot 3 at 5,992 sq. ft. Minimum Lot Width 80’, 100’ for corner lots Varies, minimum is lot 6 at 33’ Minimum ROW Width 60’ for local street 40’ District Standards Front yard setback 35’, 30’ for open porch 23’ from curb for all lots, greater on lots 5,6,7 Side yard setback 15’ for lots over 100 feet 12.5’ for lots 65‐100 feet Under 65 foot lots: 10% lot width on North & West 20% lot width on South & East No less than 5’ on either side 5’ Side‐Street Setback 35’ cannot reduce building envelope to less than 27’ 10’ 8 Generally, Planning staff are comfortable with the above reductions in code standards. The change in ROW width was flagged early on in review. In addition to ensuring proper pavement width, ROW is also necessary for the inclusion of both public and private utilities. In this case, however, the reduction in ROW is being managed by the inclusion of oversized drainage and utility easements over the front portion of each lot along the new roadway. These easements will effectively act as ROW, allowing buried utilities to be put in place, and for City staff to access and maintain these utilities if needed. As noted above, while the reduction in lot width and area put these new residential properties below the current subdivision standards, this has been done intentionally to preserve larger outlots of open space for reforestation and storm water management systems. The immediate area contains a number of lots with widths below the code required 80 feet, and even less than 60 or 50 feet. As such, the new lots would not appear overly inconsistent with their surroundings. The reduced setbacks for front and side yards are the most significant flexibilities provided from the R‐1 zoning district requirements. While only 23’ at they’re closest to the new roadway, most of the homes would be setback further from those on the western side of Pennsylvania than if the site were redeveloped using traditional subdivision controls. For lots under 65’ feet in width, a percentage based setback is typically required between homes, as described in the table above. Alternating based on the side of the home (North & West vs. South & East) provides slightly more space between homes than what is shown here. Two 50’ lots side by side would have a five foot setback on one side, and a ten foot setback on the other, leaving 15’ total between homes. Here that combined spacing would be reduced to ten feet total. Fire Safety Considerations Staff from the Fire Department had relatively few comments based on the proposal. The street having multiple access points eliminates any need for the Fire Department to determine adequate turning radiuses for their emergency vehicles. Existing public fire hydrants along both Plymouth and Pennsylvania would provide enough range to access all of the proposed homes. Building Inspections staff did note that given the 5’ setback between structures, any type of projection from the homes, such as decorative cornice or roof eaves, would need to be fire rated according to the International Residential Code. This would be confirmed at the time of building permitting. While not required, due to being served by a public roadway, the Fire Chief recommended that the builder consider providing sprinklers to the single‐family homes. This could potentially be an option Rear yard setback 25’ 20’ Side Wall Articulation Side wall longer than 32’ in length must be articulated, with a shift of at least two feet in depth, for at least eight feet in length, for every 32’ of wall. No articulation indicated. 9 for homebuyers to opt into given that it is not required, so long as the domestic water utility line was sized correctly. Engineering and Environmental Considerations Between the Preliminary and Final PUD Plan, Engineering staff have worked closely with the applicant to ensure that recommend revisions and modifications have been made prior to the submittal of the Final PUD. They note that while there will almost certainly be minor revisions between now and construction, the combined civil plans reflect their own recommendations to the project team, and represent the manner and specifications for streets, utilities that will be used during construction. Those items that remain outstanding are items such as maintenance and access agreements, details as to timing and bidding for public utilities such as the new proposed road, and the review of the grading, drainage, erosion control, and floodplain impacts by the Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission. These items are conditions of approval for the Final PUD Plan, similar to in other recent developments in which such easements and review were required. Their review of the Final PUD Plan raises no concerns however that would cause them to recommend anything other than support for the PUD. Environmental Resources staff have also been central in the review of PUD between preliminary approval and the submittal of the Final PUD, given the fact that this development represents a very significant action within a shoreland area. With the Preliminary PUD, environmental and engineering staff had a number of outstanding questions regarding storm water management, tree replacement and overall landscaping. Those questions have in large part been addressed by the applicant and property owner and the Final PUD represents a major step forward in these regards. Key components which had seen revision following the preliminary approval include:  A greater effort on replanting trees on‐site to replace those lost during construction, and especially to reforest the highly visible corner at Plymouth and Pennsylvania with a mix of native species. o 91% of mitigation requirements being met with onsite planting  Revisions to the stormwater management plan to route all runoff through a two‐part system (eliminating the off‐site vault to the east) that provides infiltration in addition to rate control.  Use of native grasses and vegetation in areas around Bassett Creek and in areas of steep slopes  The dedication of conservation easements, both over sections of the PUD within the shoreland setback, and over Country Club property in between the Creek and PUD. While some aspects of these plans will still be subject to review by the Bassett Creek Watershed Commission, environmental staff are comfortable with the current plans in regard to their preservation and protections of nearby natural resources. Public Amenity Evaluation The PUD Public Amenity Point System was added to the City’s PUD requirements in 2015 to better quantify the values of various public amenities that could be provided by an applicant in order to balance concessions from the zoning and subdivision code allowed by the City. In order to meet the 10 requirement, a PUD must provide one or more amenities whose value adds up to at least 5 points. The table below outlines the Amenities identified by the applicant, their value, and any suggested modifications to points provided by staff. Amenity Description Code Value Proposed Amenity Enhanced bicycle and pedestrian facilities ‐ Eligible facilities may include a combination of the following: heated transit shelter, bicycle repair tools, rest area, wayfinding signs, sheltered walkway, woonerf, and other amenities that increase the convenience and encourage the use of public walkways and bikeways beyond what is otherwise required in the underlying zoning district 2 Rest area on Outlot A. Pair of covered benches and bike parking provided off of the sidewalk along Pennsylvania. Native vegetation and trees surrounding, with a view east into the prairie area above the underground stormwater system. Electric car charging station ‐ An electric vehicle charging station accessible to residents, employees, and/or the public providing connections at the rate of five percent of the required parking spaces. 1 2 homes would have electric vehicle stations installed already, the remaining homes would have the stations roughed in but not installed (able to be added by future owner). 2 homes exceeds the 5% of minimum required parking (2 spaces per dwelling, 5% of 14 spaces is 1 space rounded up). Enhanced Vegetation ‐ A landscaping plan prepared by a licensed landscape architect that provides exceptional design with a variety of pollinators and native trees, shrubs, and plant types that provide seasonal interest and that exceed minimum City standards. 1 Revised landscape plan includes a much greater focus on native grasses, plant species, and trees. Vegetation is being used strategically in areas of steep slopes to prevent erosion over time, large open spaces are dedicated to provide space for landscaping, and a conservation easement is provided over both the portions of the PUD with steep slopes and nearer to Bassett Creek. Green Path Advanced Certification ‐ Homes would be constructed to the energy and environmental standards of the Minnesota Green Path Advanced Certification Program. Petitioned Amenity – 1 points requested Additional details on the program are provided by the applicant and are attached to this memo. Generally, the Advanced Certification states to be 50% more energy efficient than a typical new build home today, and the homes shown in the preliminary plan would also qualify for LEED Silver. City currently only awards 3 points to LEED Gold and 4 points for LEED Platinum. 11 Originally the applicant had proposed to include some type of public art with this PUD project. An early suggestion by staff had been the use of plaques providing local history of either the Creek or indigenous communities in the area. Additional options included sculptures or art incorporated into the seating and bike parking. Overall this amenity was not warmly received by either Planning Commission or City Council, and so the applicant refocused their efforts on Outlot A to provide a modest bike/ped rest area that would not disrupt the neighborhood and a more robust landscaping/tree replacement plan for the area to create a natural feel. Environmental staff agreed with the revised landscaping plan meeting the standards for enhanced vegetation, especially given the dedication of a conservation easement over the entirety of Outlot B and the shoreland setback area, which would ensure that the native vegetation in these areas would be required to remain in place for perpetuity. Otherwise, the applicant is still seeking amenity points for the previously discussed electric vehicle charging stations inside the homes, the enhanced bicycle and pedestrian facilities for the rest area, and a petition for one amenity point for the homes being built to the Advanced Certification requirements of the Minnesota Green Path program. Previously with the public art piece, the petitioned points from this last item would not be required, however with the revisions to the PUD plan, at least 1 point is needed to meet the 5 point minimum. In the Preliminary PUD memo, staff noted they would only be comfortable awarding 1 point for this certification, given that it did not provide the same degree of efficiency requirements of LEED Platinum or Gold, which are identified in the PUD code. Staff’s thoughts on the program are unchanged. While there is value to the additional requirements it places on the construction, it is less than that of those LEED programs identified in code, and therefore should be awarded a lower point value. Findings In order approve a Preliminary or Final PUD, the City must be able to make the following findings: Quality Site Planning. The PUD plan must be tailored to the specific characteristics of the site and achieve a higher quality of site planning and design than generally expected under conventional provisions of the zoning chapter. Standard Met. The Final PUD Plan is much improved in regard to its management and planning around the critical natural resources on and near the site. As in the Preliminary Plan, individual lots have a decreased footprint in the PUD in order to preserve large open space outlots. With revisions to the grading and landscaping plans, these outlots contain additional trees and native plant species to maximize their value as green space. The removal of the outlot to east shown in the preliminary plans is an improvement in staff’s eyes, given its original underutilization. The decision to include a new public road connection, while creating some challenges for the developer in coordinating with the city for its construction, ultimately makes this a better plan for it. The new roadway would remove the need for multiple access points along Pennsylvania that could create hazards to traffic, while also creating additional spacing between the new homes and those on the west side of Pennsylvania. The homes themselves 12 utilize the lots topography in order to include a lower level walkout, while keeping the front façade of the home along the street at a single‐story. Preservation. The PUD plan must preserve and protect substantial desirable portions of the site’s characteristics, open space, and sensitive environmental features including steep slopes, trees, scenic views, creeks, wetlands, and open waters. Standard Met. Protection of Bassett Creek is evident from the layout of the plan overall and in the short term based on its Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan. While stormwater is being managed via underground systems, both systems, and especially the northern vault are providing infiltration in order to meets City and Watershed standards. In addition, while aboveground systems provide external value in providing natural habitat, the applicant is utilizing a mix of prairie grasses over the area of each underground system, in order to get at that habitat benefit, albeit providing an alternative natural environment than an open pond. These underground systems will end up catching all runoff from hardcover on the site, whether that is coming from the private residential lots, or the new public street connection. A major improvement over the preliminary plan is the reforestation occurring on both of the open space outlots, in addition to the overall increase in native landscaping, grasses, and shrubs. While the redevelopment activity leaves little opportunity for preservation of mature trees, forestry staff are supportive of the replanting efforts, which should result in a much greater diversity of species on‐site. Native vegetation is being used strategically in areas of steep slopes and within the shoreland setback area in order to stabilize soils and prevent erosion. Whereas the preliminary plan include widespread use of Kentucky bluegrass sod, the revisions to the landscaping plan show these non‐native grasses only in select areas: around the curb of Outlot A for mowing, and on some of the residential lots. No bluegrass sod is being shown within the shoreland setback, even on those residential lots that intersect this setback. During the preliminary PUD review, environmental staff flagged the lack of a connection with Bassett Creek as atypical for subdivision and recommended that a conservation easement be provided over this area between the PUD and the Creek to the South. In collaboration with the developer and the Golden Valley Country Club, conservation easements will be placed on those areas of the PUD that fall within the shoreland setback, over the entirety of Outlot B, and also on a portion of the Country Club property to the centerline of Bassett Creek. This conservation easement, while designed to not restrict the playability of the golf course areas it might cover, will ensure that native vegetations will remain in place long‐term and that the public water will be protected. The easement would also restrict new aboveground structures, and require City approvals for any changes to the natural environment. The dedication of this easement was a critical aspect of City environmental staff’s approval of the Final PUD Plan. Efficient; Effective. The PUD plan must include efficient and effective use of the land (which includes preservation). 13 Standard Met. Given the proximity to Bassett Creek, the decision to cluster homes closer together and provide larger sections of open space makes sense. With the Final PUD Plan, these preserved open spaces have been further improved by additional reforestion and replanting of vegetation that would be impacted during construction. As noted above, the removal of the eastern outlot from the plans is in response to staff comments on the Preliminary PUD. The outlot previously was underutilized as part of the PUD, and removing it leaves that area for use in a potential future subdivision. The applicant reworked the southern outlot to include additional area, which is now being used for reforestation efforts, and which will be covered under the aforementioned conservation easement, providing much greater public benefit than the original plan. Consistency. The PUD plan must result in development that is compatible with adjacent uses and consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and redevelopment plans and goals. Standard Met. In terms of consistency with adjacent uses, staff finds the Preliminary Plan to fit well. Other than the Country Club, the site is surrounded by single‐family zoned properties. Existing lots in the area range in width from 50‐100+ feet, and while these new homes would have reduced setbacks from one another, the PUD overall would represent a housing unit density of just over three units per acre. This is within the 1‐4 units guided by the Low Density Land Use Category and comparable to that of the surrounding area. Staff generally finds the proposal consistent with Comprehensive Plan. Given that the Golf Course was not discussed for redevelopment as part of the Comprehensive Plan, staff is instead reliant on that document’s Goals and Policies. 1. Land Use, Goal 4, Objective 1.4 ‐ Work with developers to provide permanent open space and park areas in development plans and to integrate native species 2. Land Use, Goal 4, Objective 2.3 ‐ Use Planned Unit Developments to allow for flexibility in site design when needed to preserve vegetation or other sensitive site features or to re‐ introduce natural areas 3. Housing, Goal 2 ‐ Expand the variety of housing types and designs to allow all people a housing choice for all life stages and all economic means 4. Housing, Goal 4, Objective 1 ‐ Ensure new housing developments meet or exceed energy efficiency standards, and implement sustainable design features where possible 5. Parks & Natural Resources, Goal 3, Objective 1.2 ‐ Review development proposals for conformance with ordinances regarding tree preservation, water quality, wetland protection and mitigation, and shoreland protection 6. Water Resources, Goal 1, Objective 3.2 ‐ Minimize the rate and volume of stormwater runoff entering Bassett Creek 7. Water Resources, Goal 4, Objective 1.3 ‐ Regulate stormwater runoff discharges and volumes to minimize flood risk, flood damages, and the future costs of stormwater management systems General Health. The PUD plan must be consistent with preserving and improving the general health, safety, and welfare of the people of the city. 14 Standard Met. The planned storm water management for the site would provide infiltration and rate control for all stormwater runoff created within the PUD. A greater degree of trees are being replaced on‐site, and with greater biodiversity than what had existed previously. The new roadway reduces traffic conflict points along Pennsylvania Avenue, and city engineers are not concerned with the increase in vehicle traffic that could be expected from seven new single‐family homes. With the homes set back from Pennsylvania, and presenting as a single story from the ROW, staff believes they have been planned and designed in order to fit with the existing residential neighborhood, despite reductions to setbacks and lot width. Meets Requirements. The PUD plan must meet the intent and purpose provisions of Section 113‐123 as well as all other provisions. The purpose and intent of the Planned Unit Development code chapter reads, “It is the intent of this section to provide an optional method of regulating land use which permits flexibility from the other provisions of the City Code, including flexibility in uses allowed, setbacks, height, parking requirements, number of buildings on a lot, and similar regulations in exchange for public benefit in the form of amenities.” Generally, staff feels the plans for this development follow the intent of the PUD code. Areas where flexibilities are being requested (setbacks, ROW, lot size) are all allowed under the PUD code, and the amenities being proposed are consistent with those highlighted by the City in code. The improvements made between the Preliminary and Final PUD Plan were responsive to both the requests of staff as well as the discussion and critique provided during the Planning Commission and City Council’s review of the original plans. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the Final Plan for Golden Valley Country Club Villas PUD No. 126, subject to the following conditions: 1. The plans prepared by Ron Clark Construction, dated November 3rd and 4th 2021, shall become part of this approval 2. The plans are subject to the review and approval of the Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission. 3. The required park dedication fee shall be paid prior to the release of the final plat. 4. The Final Plat shall include “PUD No. 126” in its title 5. Final Construction Plans and cost estimates for the site and public improvements must be submitted to the City for review and approval. 6. Details as to the construction of site and public improvements shall be finalized prior to the consideration of approval of the Development Agreement and Final Plat, and are subject to the approval of the City Engineer 7. All required easements and agreements shall be dedicated or executed prior to the release of the final plat, including but not limited to drainage and utility easements, public 15 use and access easements, development agreement, escrow and deposit agreement for public improvements, and conservation easements. 8. The impervious surface area on each of the residential lots shall be limited to listed square footage in the plans dated November 4th 2021, in order to preserve open space within the shoreland area and to remain consistent with the stormwater calculations that determined the design of the stormwater management facilities. 9. Overhead power adjacent to and within the development must be buried as well as all utilities serving the site; joint trench for private utilities is preferred to maximize efficient use of the right‐of‐way. 10. Sanitary sewer main in Pennsylvania Avenue must be lined for I&I compliance and any existing sanitary sewer stubs to the site must be abandoned. 11. Applicant shall submit HOA documents and all other private easements, declarations, covenants, and restrictions for the development prior to approval of the Final Plat. Attachments Applicant Narrative (7 pages) Proposed Final Plat (1 page) Plan Sets (survey, site plan, landscaping, etc.) (22 pages) Concept Floor Plans (4 pages) Greenpath Program Information (8 pages) Draft Homeowner’s Association Documents (40 pages) REGULAR MEETING MINUTES This meeting was conducted in a hybrid format with in‐person and remote options for attending, participating, and commenting. The City used Webex to conduct this meeting and members of the public were able to monitor the meetings by watching it on Comcast cable channel 16, by streaming it on CCXmedia.org, or by dialing in to the public call‐in line. 1. Call to Order The meeting was called to order at 7:00 by Chair Pockl. Roll Call Commissioners in person: Rich Baker, Adam Brookins, Sophia Ginis, Andy Johnson, Lauren Pockl, Mike Ruby, Chuck Segelbaum Commissioners absent: Staff present: Myles Campbell – Planner, Jason Zimmerman – Planning Manager Council Liaison present: Gillian Rosenquist 2. Approval of Agenda Chair Pockl asked for a motion to approve the agenda. MOTION made by Commissioner Segelbaum, seconded by Commissioner Brookins, to approve the agenda of November 8, 2021. Motion carried. 3. Approval of Minutes Chair Pockl asked for a motion to approve the minutes from October 25, 2021. MOTION made by Commissioner Brookins, seconded by Commissioner Ginis. Abstain: Baker, Segelbaum Motion carried. 1. Informal Public Hearing – Final Plan for Golden Valley Country Club Villas PUD No. 126 Address: 7001 Golden Valley Road Applicant: Ron Clark Construction Myles Campbell, City Planner, gave a summary on the property selling an unused portion of the Gold Course and Ron Clark Construction was selected as the development partner. Campbell reviewed the plans and discussed that this is the third time this item has appeared before Planning Commission for three separate portions of this PUD process. The PUD background was discussed, Planning Commissions role and recommendations, and the applicant’s work to address conditions. November 8, 2021 – 7 pm City of Golden Valley Planning Commission Regular Meeting November 8, 2021, 2021 – 7 pm 2 Existing Conditions  No existing structures in the area  Heavily wooded, 229 total trees in project site, 165 significant, 4 legacy  Topography slopes south and east generally, sufficient grades to keep all above‐ground structures out of modeled floodplains around the Creek  Bassett Creek to the south, much of the site falls in the shoreland area, smaller portion is in the shoreland setback Preliminary ‐> Final Plan Updates  Changes to Landscaping Plan and Tree Replacement  Changes to the public road stub  Modification of Storm Water Management  Removal of former Outlot B  Reworking of Public Amenities  Conservation Easement Dedication Staff went in depth on each of the updates from the preliminary to final plan updates. Campbell addressed staff’s analysis and review process with zoning and subdivision considerations, fire safety and Engineering/Environmental considerations, public amenities, and the findings of fact. Campbell answered Commissioner questions and offered clarification on items. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the Preliminary Plan for Golden Valley Country Club Villas PUD No. 126, subject to the following conditions: 1. The plans prepared by Ron Clark Construction, dated November 3rd and 4th 2021, shall become part of this approval 2. The plans are subject to the review and approval of the Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission. 3. The required park dedication fee shall be paid prior to the release of the final plat. 4. The Final Plat shall include “PUD No. 126” in its title 5. Final Construction Plans and cost estimates for the site and public improvements must be submitted to the City for review and approval. 6. Details as to the construction of site and public improvements shall be finalized prior to the consideration of approval of the Development Agreement and Final Plat, and are subject to the approval of the City Engineer 7. All required easements and agreements shall be dedicated or executed prior to the release of the final plat, including but not limited to drainage and utility easements, public use and access easements, development agreement, escrow and deposit agreement for public improvements, and conservation easements. City of Golden Valley Planning Commission Regular Meeting November 8, 2021, 2021 – 7 pm 3 8. The impervious surface area on each of the residential lots shall be limited to listed square footage in the plans dated November 4th 2021, in order to preserve open space within the shoreland area and to remain consistent with the stormwater calculations that determined the design of the stormwater management facilities. 9. Homes within the PUD will be restricted to a single story above grade as measured from the front yard, with a maximum height of 25 ft 10. Overhead power adjacent to and within the development must be buried as well as all utilities serving the site; joint trench for private utilities is preferred to maximize efficient use of the right‐of‐way. 11. Sanitary sewer main in Pennsylvania Avenue must be lined for I&I compliance and any existing sanitary sewer stubs to the site must be abandoned. 12. Applicant shall submit HOA documents and all other private easements, declarations, covenants, and restrictions for the development prior to approval of the Final Plat. Chair Pockl asked staff what the specific request of the Planning Commission is at tonight’s meeting. Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager, responded that general approval of the PUD is not since that was done by City Council’s general approval of the preliminary plan. This group is asked to review for consistency with what was presented in the preliminary plan and any conditions recommended by Council. Campbell answered a few clarifying questions from Commissioners on outlots and homeowners’ associations, plantings and future maintenance, old outlot B. Commissioner Baker commented that this is a Country Club project and therefore benefits to the City could occur anywhere on the Country Club and not this specific location. It was noted that the applicant was representing the Country Club as the lot hadn’t been divided yet and the Club still owned it. Zimmerman responded that if they were within a hundred feet or so of the location that would make sense however beyond that there would need to be other considerations. Baker followed by asking how many PUDs the City has approved in the last 10‐20 years. Zimmerman responded that in the last 9 years there have been about 13 brand new PUD’s approved. The conversations went on to understand approval rates beyond that. Staff and Commissioners reviewed a few more items to understand conditions and continued accountability. Commissioners asked numerous questions on traffic regulations, curb cuts, trees/tree conservation, and landscape plans. Chair Pockl invited the applicant to speak. Mike Waldo ‐ Ron Clark Construction, Applicant, discussed conditions between the preliminary and final PUD proposal, he specifically pointed out the HOA will be responsible for landscaping to remain consistent with the PUD. Applicant stated that Ron Clark is the applicant, the current owner gave consent for the application but they are applying for just the site that became the PUD. More trees on other areas of the course didn’t make sense as it wasn’t part of the actual application. City of Golden Valley Planning Commission Regular Meeting November 8, 2021, 2021 – 7 pm 4 Commissioner Segelbaum stated they were proposing 70% of the mitigation requirement in the preliminary but now are proposing 91% of the environmental mitigation and the remainder will be a fee. Segelbaum asked why the applicant didn’t commit to 100% mitigation. The applicant had the landscape architect navigate that process and the goal was larger, healthier, longer living trees rather than a greater number of trees. The plantable space was decreased by the stormwater management area as well. Commissioners and the applicant discussed plantings, trees, and sapling sizes to be transplanted. Chair Pockl opened the public hearing at 8:46pm. There were no residents present for comment nor were there callers. Staff presented a written comment that was received prior to the meeting, it was attached in the agenda. Chair Pockl closed the public hearing at 8:50pm Chair Pockl opened the discussion. Commissioner Ginis stated general agreement with staff findings and recalled the applicant to ask about articulation. Applicant responded that with side setbacks, the articulation loses a lot of space. Commissioner Baker stated the stormwater management approach combined with landscaping is a big improvement, although he would like to see more opportunities to achieve green infrastructure in the city. Baker added that the Planning Commission unanimously recommended action on this project and is disappointed City Council disregarded that recommendation. He went on to review the conservation and environmental items that he felt were missed opportunities by staff and Council as part of this project. Commissioner Johnson added comments regarding the tree plantings and the exception for the green path; feeling both should be reconsidered. He continued with the general requirement for 26ft wide streets through Golden Valley and finds the exception for this portion of road to be 28ft wide to be inconsistent. Commissioner Segelbaum mentioned the applicant meeting the environmental mitigation requirement at 91% and said he’d like to see 100%. He also discussed the roadway, the frontage from each property, and the setback. Commissioner Brookins said while he’s disappointed, the plan in front of the group represents what was asked of the applicant by the Council. He added that this particular project type and size, doesn’t fit with what they had in mind when creating the zoning and that may be why the group feels disappointed. The amenity points don’t satisfy him so Brookins said he will vote against this project and recommend the Council amend the point scoring. Baker added he will also vote to oppose the recommendation of approval, feeling the City Council should reconsider their decisions. Commissioner Ruby asked staff what the charge for the group is today. Staff read the code language for the final PUD process: Planning Commission shall review the final PUD plan for consistency with the preliminary PUD plan, as approved by City Council and the conditions, if any, imposed by the City Council. The intent and purpose provisions of subsection A of this and all other provisions of this section, principals and standards adhere to in the City. City of Golden Valley Planning Commission Regular Meeting November 8, 2021, 2021 – 7 pm 5 Zimmerman added that there are two pieces, is this consistent with what the City Council was approving and also the group could look at the larger intent and purpose and if it’s needed. Maybe Council felt there was but maybe this group doesn’t. Chair Pockl stated she was disappointed when she heard what the direction from Council was as she doesn’t feel the PUD requirements are satisfied. She reiterated Johnson’s comments on consistency and referred to the Comprehensive Plan and that this PUD isn’t consistent with the environmental preservation portion. Commissioner Ruby added that in this development, he’s struggling to understand the benefit of the PUD and how it differs from another home. Commissioner Ginis added she’s struggling to see the difference between a PUD and if a developer bought the property outright. She went on to say she wasn’t comfortable denying an applicant when they were directed to meet conditions, did, and have now returned. She asked what the road to success looked like if this wasn’t it. Staff went on to explain the history of the project, rezoning, the PUD, and when the request was made. Ruby asked to review the list of finding and comment on each one specifically to send comments to the Council. 1. Quality Site Planning – Segelbaum thought it didn’t meet that considering the change from the stub to flow, lot widths were not improved. It’s also unclear if full tree mitigation was met. Brookins commented that amenities are not a good fit. Ginis said the lot width differs from home placement, 5ft is inconsistent on lots 6/7. Baker added that the conservation efforts are modest at best and doesn’t meet this finding. The project could make a better contribution. Johnson stated there was inconsistency in street width and the sidewalk extension. 2. Preservation – Segelbaum stated that tree mitigation falls under this category for the same reason. Baker said conservation falls under this item for the same reasons (easement, old outlot, basset creek) 3. Efficient/Effective – Segelbaum stated the 5ft sideyard setback shouldn’t qualify as an efficient use of property. 4. Consistency – Pockl stated the project isn’t consistent with a number of goals, documents, and policies. 5. General Health – removal of a natural habitat impacts the general health of the plants and animals. Ruby stated that moving a habitat should be discussed because it’s not actually moving. Segelbaum added that the plot is private property, not a wetland conservation area so they can o what they’d like. However, with the amount of deforestation in the plan, he feels it doesn’t meet this requirement. 6. Meets Requirements – No comments Ruby asked where community art and bike lane falls. Campbell responded that it’s in the general requirements for the public amenity point system. MOTION made by Commissioner Baker, seconded by Commissioner Johnson, to recommend denial of the final PUD 126 based on the observations on findings. Motion passed unanimously. City of Golden Valley Planning Commission Regular Meeting November 8, 2021, 2021 – 7 pm 6 2.Discussion – 2022‐2031 Capital Improvement Program Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager, reminded the group that annually the City works on it’s Capital Works Program. This outlines all the planned City investments in a 10year timeline. One piece of that is for the Planning Commission is to review that CIP and to recommend to City Council if there is consistency. Zimmerman broke down items, timelines, projects, and which area in the Comprehensive Plan they fit under. Commissioner Johnson asked about Police Station, Public Works, and City Hall or if those items are beyond the 10‐year plan. Zimmerman stated he wasn’t sure but Council is talking about that the following day. The current plan doesn’t account for that, yet. Also, those items may not be included in the Comp Plan. A few other clarifying questions were answered by Finance Director, Sue Virnig. MOTION made by Commissioner Baker, seconded by Commissioner Segelbaum, to recommend adoption of findings that the CIP is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. Commissioner Johnson mentioned that the Council may want to have a discussion to include the police station since it was a huge part of the facilities study. Motion passed unanimously. Chair Pockl ended the televised portion of the meeting at 10:00 pm. 4.Council Liaison Report Council Member Rosenquist updated the Commissioners about the upcoming Council Work Session at which the Municipal Facilities Study report would be presented and discussions were scheduled around and update to the Sign Code, Temporary Outdoor Service Areas, and Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs). Commissioner Ruby asked if would be possible to have the City Council and Planning Commission have a face to face conversation to ensure both groups are on the same page when it comes to recent planning issues. 5.Other Business Planner Campbell noted that there are four items on the agenda for the November Board of Zoning Appeals meeting and that Commissioner Ruby would be representative. 6.Adjournment MOTION by Commissioner Ginis to adjourn, seconded by Commissioner Johnson, and approved unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 10:06 pm. ________________________________ Andy Johnson, Secretary ________________________________ Amie Kolesar, Planning Assistant 7500 West 78th Street Edina, MN 55439 (952) 947-3000 fax (952) 947-3030 Page 1 of 7 10/08/2021 Myles Campbell and Jason Zimmerman City of Golden Valley 7800 Golden Valley Road Golden Valley, MN 55427 RE: Golden Valley Country Club Villas (GVCC Villas) Preliminary PUD Application Subject: Project Narrative Introduction GVCC Villas is a proposed development of an existing vacant parcel located in the NW corner of the Golden Valley Country Club’s Golf Course to be developed by Ron Clark Construction and Design. The overall goal is to balance the existing natural environments while adding new housing to create a small neighborhood that adds to the city and revitalizes an underutilized property. The first step in this process was to determine if the city agrees that changing the land use and zoning for this parcel to low density residential is a good use for the property vs it continuing to sit vacant. This approval was received on May 4th, 2021. The next step in the process was the Preliminary PUD, this approval was received on September 9th, 2021, with 14 conditions of approval. We have worked with staff to address those items and are now submitting for Final PUD. The ability to do a PUD on the site vs. standard zoning allows for the site to incorporate the best planning to maintain some open space buffers at the intersection, preservation of more trees and reforestation with higher quality tress in areas that will continue to benefit the area for years to come. The PUD flexibility requested for the site creates a much better overall neighborhood than developing the same number of lots under the standard zoning rules. This new project will create new housing on vacant underutilized land, improve water quality going into Bassett Creek, create value for the existing area and increase the city’s tax base. Existing Zoning and the Future Land Use designations were: Institutional, Sub-district I-4 which includes Golf Courses, Parks and Natural Areas prior to our requested changes noted below were approved by the City Council on 5/4/21. The City Council on 5/4/21 approved the zoning change to R-1 single family zoning and Land Use change to Low Density Residential, both of which allow up to 5 housing units per acre, which will allow us to build seven (7) single family Villa Homes on about 2.12 acres. (Average of ~14,000 sq. ft. per home) 7500 West 78th Street Edina, MN 55439 (952) 947-3000 fax (952) 947-3030 Page 2 of 7 Our current application for a Final PUD is based on the previous applications and approvals and is requesting flexibility as allowed within the parameters of the PUD process including: o Public Street width, setbacks & ROW o Building setbacks o Lot sizes Planning The proposed development plan is for seven (7) single family Villa homes located on a new public road within the site. Site access will be from both Pennsylvania and Plymouth Avenues as determined by discussions with staff and our project team as the best solution. This solution allows the homes to be setback from the main streets this also allows room for the creation of a permanent landscape buffer near the intersection with many new trees and other vegetation. In additional we are treating all of our storm water in underground system which is a very efficient system and maintain more green space on the surface. This small alcove of homes will add to the current neighborhood and create value for the existing neighbors by delivering new high-quality residential homes with views of the golf course to the area. Planned Unit Development The single family PUD requires a maximum of 38% site coverage our plan shows 37.95% site coverage. Public Amenities provided within our proposed development include the below listed items: 1) Reduce building waste a. Engineered floor & roof trusses b. Wall panels to reduce on-site waste c. Locally sourced materials (windows, siding, OSB, components) 2) Recycle program a. Atomic Waste Recycling Program 3) Renewable Energy a. Solar rough-in to allow installation after construction is completed 4) Exterior Envelope a. MN GreenPath Program-Advanced Certification b. Roofing 40yr shingles c. All foundation insulation is exterior “WatchDog Tuff-n-Dri Foundation Exterior Insulation System 7500 West 78th Street Edina, MN 55439 (952) 947-3000 fax (952) 947-3030 Page 3 of 7 5) Windows & Doors a. Energy Star Exterior Doors & Windows b. Certified installation during construction 6) Insulation a. MN GreenPath Program-Advanced Certification b. Inspected & tested during construction 7) Interior a. Wd Floor domestic materials b. Carpet – No VOC c. Tile-locally sourced recommended 8) Paint/Stain a. No VOC 9) Lighting a. MN GreenPath Program-Advanced Certification 10) HVAC a. MN GreenPath Program-Advanced Certification b. Inspected and tested during construction 11) Cabinets & Tops a. Locally sourced or manufactured 12) Appliances a. Energy Star Rated b. MN GreenPath Program-Advanced Certification 13) Plumbing Fixtures a. MN GreenPath Program-Advanced Certification 14) Indoor Air Quality a. MN GreenPath Program-Advanced Certification b. Tested & certified during construction 15) Landscaping a. Native vegetation b. Pollinator Plants c. Engineered Irrigation plan d. Project designed & certified by Landscape Architect 16) Other Resources a. MN GreenPath Program-Advanced Certification b. 3 site visits during construction/inspected/documented c. Blower door tested & certified 7500 West 78th Street Edina, MN 55439 (952) 947-3000 fax (952) 947-3030 Page 4 of 7 Parks, Trails and Landscaping All homes within the development will have direct access to existing city sidewalks and trails and enjoy beautiful views of the existing Golden Valley Country Club & Golf Course and the Minneapolis skyline. The site and new home landscaping are designed to blend with the current golf course amenities and trees. Though replacement tree plantings can never initially make up for the necessary tree removal, many of the existing tress that will be removed are near the end of their life span, native species will be selected and placed in an effort toward reforestation for a future healthy habitat. Plant selections with wetland preservation and enhancement will create an Urban Ecology theme throughout the development. We have worked with various citi in the past to create neighborhoods near sensitive ecological areas with great results for both the residents and environment. We recently worked closing with the city of Minnetonka to create Legacy Oaks, a unique neighborhood surrounded by wetlands and natural areas, the final result is beautiful homes and substantial improvement of wetland functions and water quality along with improvement of the surrounding natural areas. Housing and Architecture The single family Villa homes will be planned and designed to fit into the existing neighborhood but also will add a new style of housing not currently in the neighborhood. We are planning a mix of home designs that range between 2700 and 3700 square feet. The home designs will offer two car-plus garages, sunrooms, porches, and decks with a variety internal floorplans and exterior styles. The overall architecture is still in the development stage and will be completed with involvement from the course as to the architectural guidelines but if you look at the neighborhoods we are currently working on, you will get a feel of the quality the homes, the varied designs and neighborhood feel we deliver. We also focus on energy efficient building practices as part of the Minnesota GreenPath Advanced Certification Builder program. Associations A Home Owners Association will be planned for the neighborhood. The association will maintain each homes snow removal and lawn care along with maintaining any common area landscaping. PUD scoring The city ordinance requires a PUD to receive 5 points to qualify for PUD flexibility. We have worked with staff to determine the best path forward on the pointing for our small scale project and requested flexibility, as such we are requesting points for: Bike Rest area – 2 Points, see attached drawings 7500 West 78th Street Edina, MN 55439 (952) 947-3000 fax (952) 947-3030 Page 5 of 7 Electric Charging station – 1 Point – requirement is based on 5% of parking stalls (14*.05=1), we will provide 2 complete charging stations in the homes and rough-in charging stations in the other 5 so customers can add as needed. Leadership in Energy - 1 Point – We have provided the information related to our participation in MN Green Path energy program. This program requires energy saving that is over and above what is required by code and is tested and certified by a third-party certified inspector, this energy program we feel meets or exceeds the LEED Silver program energy requirements. Enhanced Landscaping and Native grasses – 1 Point - The landscape plan for the Golden Valley Country Club Villas (GVCCV) has evolved since the project’s preliminary PUD application, where the landscape plan demonstrated a base compliance, to this refined version, with a much more robust landscape plan emphasizing a native plant palette. The proposed landscape plan attempts to provide an improvement from the site’s existing plant material, as well as pollinator food and habitat for wildlife, and a benefit to the Golden Valley community as a high-quality landscape. The original site consisted of woodland, of which the neighborhood valued for providing scenic shade when walking in the neighborhood along the intersection of Pennsylvania Ave NE and Plymouth Ave. The proposed landscape plan attempts to improve on the existing woodland by providing higher quality native trees for future shade, as well as a public seating area providing benches, shade, and bike racks for pedestrians and bicyclists to rest while enjoying the natural scenery. Red Oaks are intentionally proposed along the two roads for their quick growth, to replace the shade lost. The woodland settings throughout the project site are created by spacing groupings of trees like Quaking Aspen closely together, and planting trees of staggered sizes to mimic the canopy and subcanopy found in naturally occurring woodlands. In effort to maintain a natural, less manicured landscape while the trees are young, the areas within and around the tree groupings are proposed to be seeded with central-Minnesota native woodland grasses and wildflower seed, which will tolerate areas of shade as the tree canopies grow, and areas of tallgrass and wildflower seed for open areas with fewer tree cover. These native seed mixes will be beneficial for providing slope stabilization and slowing rainwater runoff along steeper slopes on the areas adjacent to Bassett Creek, as well as for providing wildlife habitat, and reducing the sod, irrigation, and resources needed to mow sodded areas. The following are some of the landscape plan’s other highlights: • The landscape plan meets the minimum landscape requirements as set by the city of Golden Valley. It also provides 90% of the required replacement trees within the original project site, which is in effort to preserve the existing woodland conditions valued by the neighborhood. • Of the proposed replacement trees, all the overstory and coniferous tree species are considered native to the state of Minnesota. • 5 of the 10 native species are considered native down to a range of 200 miles of this area prior to 1840 settlement in Minnesota: 7500 West 78th Street Edina, MN 55439 (952) 947-3000 fax (952) 947-3030 Page 6 of 7 1. Basswood 2. Burr Oak 3. Red Maple 4. Red Oak 5. Quaking Aspen As mentioned above, the project area currently consists of woodlands valued by the community, so an effort was made to replace the woodland plant material with high quality plant material that will be beneficial both today and in the future. In the current landscape, there are 229 trees impacted by the project area limits. 165 of these trees are classified by the city of Golden Valley as significant, 4 are legacy trees, and 60 are non-significant. The GVCCV project will be preserving 14 significant trees and 10 non-significant trees. Of the 155 significant trees being removed: 66%, or 102 trees, are not native to the state of Minnesota. 60%, or 94 trees, are black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia), including one legacy tree, which is an aggressive non- native tree classified as a restricted noxious weed by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Due to the aggressive nature of black locust trees, all black locust on the project site are proposed to be removed, whether directly impacted by the project design or not. The intention of the proposed landscape is to replace the current woodland valued by the Golden Valley community with an improved plant palette, while also providing benefit to the wildlife, Bassett Creek, and support of sustainability efforts in the community by reducing areas requiring mowing and irrigation. Included in our development application are the below listed documents: (all documents submitted electronically on 10/8/21) and are organized per the following outline. 01) This project description and narrative 02) Final PUD and Plat Application 03) Survey & Legal Description 04) Site Plan & Site Coverage 05) Grading & Utility Plans 06) Unit Plans & Building Elevations 07) Landscaping & Tree Plan along with Removal plan 08) Conservation Easement 09) Stormwater Calcs & Plan 10) HOA Documents (to be provided) 11) Final Plat 7500 West 78th Street Edina, MN 55439 (952) 947-3000 fax (952) 947-3030 Page 7 of 7 Fees: A check for the city fees for the above applications and the original signed application was delivered to the city prior to the submittal Conclusion Ron Clark Construction is honored to have the opportunity to develop this new single-family Villa neighborhood in Golden Valley in conjunction with the Golden Valley Country Club. We were selected by the course from a group of application because the course felt we could deliver a new neighborhood that both the City and the Golf Course would be proud of. We believe our concept both protects and enhances the existing natural amenities while developing an underutilized area of the city by adding high quality housing, new residents and increased tax base. We are proud to present this high-quality Ron Clark Construction development concept for your consideration and look forward to working with the City of Golden Valley through the approval and construction process. Mike Waldo CEO Mike Roebuck President 1 COVER SHEET GOVERNING SPECIFICATIONS: PROJECT DIRECTORY N 15 21-013 10/08/2021 GREENWAY VILLAS RON CLARK CONSTRUCTION GOLDEN VALLEY, MN N CAMPION ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC CLYLO EQJLQHHULQJ LDQG PODQQLQJ FLOOD ZONE AE ZONE AE S89°00'09"E 304.23 S0°15'37"E 557.78S27°54'00"W 397.62S0°08'23"E36.78S10°46'26"W79.86S37°50'25"W 71.89S62°5 0' 1 5 " W 63.69 2 2 2 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NPLYMOUTH AVENUE 1 S27°54'00"W 397.62GENERAL NOTES LEGEND NOTES CORRESPONDING TO SCHEDULE B - 2 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION TABLE "A" OPTIONAL ITEMS CERTIFICATION 1 2 STATEMENT OF POSSIBLE ENCROACHMENTS VICINITY MAP SUBJECT PROPERTY OREGON AVE NZONE AE N0 0 ° 1 6 ' 3 7 " W FLOOD ZONE AE ZONE AE 2 2 2 1 15 21-013 10/08/2021 GREENWAY VILLAS RON CLARK CONSTRUCTION GOLDEN VALLEY, MN N CAMPION ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC CLYLO EQJLQHHULQJ LDQG PODQQLQJ 3 SITE PLAN N LEGEND PROPERTY DESCRIPTION OREGON AVE NBASSETTCREEK DR .ZONE AEFLOOD ZONE AEZONE AE222PENNSYLVANIA AVE N PLYMOUTH AVENUE115 21-013 10/08/2021 GREENWAY VILLAS RON CLARK CONSTRUCTION GOLDEN VALLEY, MN N CAMPION ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC CLYLO EQJLQHHULQJ LDQG PODQQLQJ 4 SANITARY SEWER & WATERMAIN PLAN-GREENWAY PASS N’ ’ ” ’ ’ ’ ” ” “– ” ’ ’ “” ’ ’ ’’ LEGEND GREENWAY PASS OREGON AVE N222PENNSYLVANIA AVE N PLYMOUTH AVENUE115 21-013 10/08/2021 GREENWAY VILLAS RON CLARK CONSTRUCTION GOLDEN VALLEY, MN N CAMPION ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC CLYLO EQJLQHHULQJ LDQG PODQQLQJ 5 STREET & STORM SEWER PLAN & PROFILE-GEENWAY PASS NDETAIL A DETAIL B ’ ’ ’ ’ DETAIL C LEGEND GREENWAY PASS OREGON AVE NBASSETTCREEK DR .222PENNSYLVANIA AVE N PLYMOUTH AVENUE115 21-013 10/08/2021 GREENWAY VILLAS RON CLARK CONSTRUCTION GOLDEN VALLEY, MN N CAMPION ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC CLYLO EQJLQHHULQJ LDQG PODQQLQJ 6 STORM SEWER PROFILES NDETAIL A DETAIL B DOWNSPOUT CONNECTION DETAIL OREGON AVE N2 2 2 1 15 21-013 10/08/2021 GREENWAY VILLAS RON CLARK CONSTRUCTION GOLDEN VALLEY, MN N CAMPION ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC CLYLO EQJLQHHULQJ LDQG PODQQLQJ 7 GRADING PLAN N SEE SHEET 15 FOR GRADING NOTES LEGEND N0 0 ° 1 6 ' 3 7 " W 33. 0 1 FLOOD ZONE AE ZONE AE 2 2 2PENNSYLVANIA AVE NPLYMOUTH AVENUE 1 15 21-013 10/08/2021 GREENWAY VILLAS RON CLARK CONSTRUCTION GOLDEN VALLEY, MN N CAMPION ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC CLYLO EQJLQHHULQJ LDQG PODQQLQJ 8 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN PROJECT DIRECTORY N SEE SHEET 15 FOR SWPPP NOTES LEGEND OREGON AVE NPENNSYLVANIA AVE NPLYMOUTH AVE 1202.88 N00°15'37"WS89°00'09"E 1311.09 ZONE AE N0 0 ° 1 6 ' 3 7 " W ZONE AE ZONE AE S89°00'09"E 622.53 S27°54'00"W 397.62S0°08'23"E 36.78 S10°46'26"W79.86S37°50'25"W 71.89 S62°50'15"W 63.69 AREA: 2.25 ACRES15 21-013 10/08/2021 GREENWAY VILLAS RON CLARK CONSTRUCTION GOLDEN VALLEY, MN N CAMPION ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC CLYLO EQJLQHHULQJ LDQG PODQQLQJ 9 TREE INVENTORY PLAN N OREGON AVE NKELLEY DRPENNSYLVANIA AVE NPLYMOUTH AVE 1202.88 N00°15'37"WS89°00'09"E 1311.09 ZONE X ZONE AE ZONE X N0 0 ° 1 6 ' 3 7 " W 33. 0 1 ZONE AE ZONE AE S89°00'09"E 622.53 S27°54'00"W 397.62S0°08'23"E 36.78 S10°46'26"W79.86S37°50'25"W 71.89 S62°50'15"W 63.69 AREA: 2.25 ACRES15 21-013 10/08/2021 GREENWAY VILLAS RON CLARK CONSTRUCTION GOLDEN VALLEY, MN N CAMPION ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC CLYLO EQJLQHHULQJ LDQG PODQQLQJ 10 TREE PRESERVATION PLAN N 15 21-013 10/08/2021 GREENWAY VILLAS RON CLARK CONSTRUCTION GOLDEN VALLEY, MN N CAMPION ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC CLYLO EQJLQHHULQJ LDQG PODQQLQJ 11 DETAILS 15 21-013 10/08/2021 GREENWAY VILLAS RON CLARK CONSTRUCTION GOLDEN VALLEY, MN N CAMPION ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC CLYLO EQJLQHHULQJ LDQG PODQQLQJ 12 DETAILS 15 21-013 10/08/2021 GREENWAY VILLAS RON CLARK CONSTRUCTION GOLDEN VALLEY, MN N CAMPION ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC CLYLO EQJLQHHULQJ LDQG PODQQLQJ 13 DETAILS & NOTES 15 21-013 10/08/2021 GREENWAY VILLAS RON CLARK CONSTRUCTION GOLDEN VALLEY, MN N CAMPION ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC CLYLO EQJLQHHULQJ LDQG PODQQLQJ 14 DETAILS & NOTES 15 21-013 10/08/2021 GREENWAY VILLAS RON CLARK CONSTRUCTION GOLDEN VALLEY, MN N CAMPION ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC CLYLO EQJLQHHULQJ LDQG PODQQLQJ 15 DETAILS & NOTES STMH 2 UGS 1 STMH 5 UGS 2 ’ ’ “” ’ ’ ” ” ”” ” ”” S89°00'09"E 304.23S0°15'37"E 557.78 S27°54'00"W 397.62S0°08'23"E36.78S10°46'26"W79.86S37°50'25"W71.89S62°50'15"W63.69222PENNSYLVANIA AVE NPLYMOUTH AVENUE1S27°54'00"W 397.62 LEGACY TREE, # 512LEGACY TREE, # 482LEGACY TREE, # 464LEGACY TREE, # 460REMOVE EXISTING TREEAND BALL ROOT, TYP.EXISTING TREES TOREMAIN, PROVIDETREE PROTECTIONFENCING, TYP.EXISTING TREES TOREMAIN, PROVIDETREE PROTECTIONFENCING, TYP.LEGACY TREE, # 512LEGACY TREE, # 482LEGACY TREE, # 464LEGACY TREE, # 460REMOVALS LEGEND:TREE PROTECTIONTREE REMOVAL - INCLUDING ROOTS AND STUMPSGREENWAY VILLAS PENNSYLVANIA AVE N. & PLYMOUTH AVE N., GOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55427 7500 W 78TH ST., MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55439 RON CLARK CONSTRUCTION PROJECT ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:2119110/08/2021FINAL PUD APPLICATION SUBMITTAL11/26/2021REVISIONS........07/23/2021CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:JSRB..............COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cP R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N24904Patrick J. SarverLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDERTHE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.11/26/21Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture5000 Glenwood AvenueGolden Valley, MN 55422civilsitegroup.com 612-615-006001" = 30'-0"30'-0"15'-0"NREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC1.1TREE PRESERVATIONPLAN............Know what'sbelow.before you dig.CallREX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVALDLTREE PROTECTIONN T S25'DRIPLINE WIDTHFURNISH A AND INSTALL TEMPORARY FENCE AT THE TREE'S DRIP LINE OR CONSTRUCTION LIMITS ASSHOWN ON PLAN, PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. WHERE POSSIBLE PLACE FENCE 25' BEYOND DRIPLINE. PLACE TREE PROTECTION SIGN ON POSTS, ONE PER INDIVIDUAL TREE (FACING CONSTRUCTIONACTIVITY), OR ONE EVERY 100' LF ALONG A GROVE OR MULTI-TREE PROTECTION AREA.POSTS AND FENCINGEXTEND FENCE 25'BEYOND DRIPLINEWHERE POSSIBLETREE PROTECTION SIGN, TYP.TREE DRIPLINE, ORCONSTRUCTION LIMITS1TREE PRESERVATION & REMOVALS NOTES:TREE MITIGATION NOTES:TREE INVENTORY NOTES:1.SEE SHEET C1.2 FOR SITE'S TREE INVENTORYMINIMUM LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS: GREENWAY VILLAS PENNSYLVANIA AVE N. & PLYMOUTH AVE N., GOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55427 7500 W 78TH ST., MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55439 RON CLARK CONSTRUCTION PROJECT ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:2119110/08/2021FINAL PUD APPLICATION SUBMITTAL11/26/2021REVISIONS........07/23/2021CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:JSRB..............COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cP R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N24904Patrick J. SarverLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDERTHE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.11/26/21Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture5000 Glenwood AvenueGolden Valley, MN 55422civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC1.2TREE PRESERVATIONPLAN............Know what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRON-SITE OVERALL TREE INVENTORY 222PENNSYLVANIA AVE NPLYMOUTH AVENUE1LEGACY TREE,# 512LEGACY TREE,# 482LEGACY TREE,# 464LEGACY TREE,# 460EDGING, TYP.SOD, TYP.ENTRANCEMONUMENTSIGNAGE5' WIDESOD / MOWSTRIP, TYP.EDGING, TYP.REPLACE EXISTINGFENCE ALONGPROPERTY LINECONSERVATIONSEED MIX, TYP.4' ALUMINUMWROUGHTIRON-STYLEFENCE, TYP.WOODLANDWILDFLOWERSEED MIX, TYP.WOODLANDWILDFLOWERSEED MIX, TYP.PUBLIC BENCH& BIKE RACKAREACONSERVATIONSEED MIX,TYP.REPLACE EXISTINGFENCELIMB UP TREESFOR VISIBILITY TOCONSERVATIONSEED AREAMOW LINE.PLANTINGS ANDVEGETATION NOT TOEXTEND BEYONDMOW LINE.1 - US1 - US1 - US1 - US1 - US1 - CP1 - CP1 - CP1 - CA1 - CA1 - MP1 - MP1 - MP1 - AG21 - AG23 - QM2 - QR3 - JE2 - CP1 - CP5 - PG3 - QR3 - PG10 - PT5 - PT21 - QB2 - CP1 - QB2 - CP1 - QB2 - CP1 - QB2 - CP2 - CP2 - AA9 - BS6 - QB4 - BS8 - PT6 - BS5 - JE2 - QR2 - QR6 - CP5 - QB2 - CP3 - AA3 - AA6 - QR2 - QM3 - PT26 - PT6 - PT2ADD (2) 6' WIDEGATESMAINTENANCEACCESS ENTRANCEPROPOSEDCONSERVATIONEASEMENTLEGACY TREE,# 512LEGACY TREE,# 482LEGACY TREE,# 464LEGACY TREE,# 460EDGING, TYP.SOD, TYP.ENTRANCEMONUMENTSIGNAGE5' WIDESOD / MOWSTRIP, TYP.EDGING, TYP.REPLACE EXISTINGFENCE ALONGPROPERTY LINECONSERVATIONSEED MIX, TYP.4' ALUMINUMWROUGHTIRON-STYLEFENCE, TYP.WOODLANDWILDFLOWERSEED MIX, TYP.WOODLANDWILDFLOWERSEED MIX, TYP.PUBLIC BENCH& BIKE RACKAREACONSERVATIONSEED MIX,TYP.REPLACE EXISTINGFENCELIMB UP TREESFOR VISIBILITY TOCONSERVATIONSEED AREAMOW LINE.PLANTINGS ANDVEGETATION NOT TOEXTEND BEYONDMOW LINE.1 - US1 - US1 - US1 - US1 - US1 - CP1 - CP1 - CP1 - CA1 - CA1 - MP1 - MP1 - MP1 - AG21 - AG23 - QM2 - QR3 - JE2 - CP1 - CP5 - PG3 - QR3 - PG10 - PT5 - PT21 - QB2 - CP1 - QB2 - CP1 - QB2 - CP1 - QB2 - CP2 - CP2 - AA9 - BS6 - QB4 - BS8 - PT6 - BS5 - JE2 - QR2 - QR6 - CP5 - QB2 - CP3 - AA3 - AA6 - QR2 - QM3 - PT26 - PT6 - PT2ADD (2) 6' WIDEGATESMAINTENANCEACCESS ENTRANCEPROPOSEDCONSERVATIONEASEMENTTREESCODEQTYCOMMON / BOTANICAL NAMECONTNATIVE PLANTSAA8ArmstroQg ReG Maple / Acer ruErum 'ArmstroQg'4" Cal. B&BBS19SKiloK SplasK BircK / Betula Qigra CSKiloK SplasKC4" Cal. B&BYCP24Prairie SeQtiQel HackEerr\ / Celtis occiGeQtalis CJFS-KSU1C TM4" Cal. B&BPT214QuakiQg AspeQ / Populus tremuloiGes2.5" Cal. B&BB&BPT24QuakiQg AspeQ / Populus tremuloiGes4" Cal. B&BB&BQB15SZamp WKite Oak / Quercus Eicolor4" Cal. B&BQM5Burr Oak / Quercus macrocarpa4" Cal. B&BB&BQR15ReG Oak / Quercus ruEra4" Cal. B&BUS5St. Croi[ AmericaQ Elm / Ulmus americaQa CSt. Croi[C4" Cal. B&BB&BEVERGREEN TREESCODEQTYCOMMON / BOTANICAL NAMECONTNATIVE PLANTSJE8EasterQ ReG CeGar / JuQiperus virgiQiaQa10C B&BPG8WKite Spruce / Picea glauca10C B&BB&BORNAMENTAL TREESCODEQTYCOMMON / BOTANICAL NAMECONTNATIVE PLANTSAG22AutumQ BrilliaQce ServiceEerr\ / AmelaQcKier [ graQGiIlora CAutumQ BrilliaQceC1.5" Cal. B&BClumpCA2PagoGa DogZooG / CorQus alterQiIolia1.5" Cal. B&BB&BMP3PrairiIire CraEapple / Malus [ CPrairiIireC1.5" Cal. B&BB&BSHRUBSCODEQTYCOMMON / BOTANICAL NAMESIZENATIVE PLANTSHJ14Little Lime H\GraQgea / H\GraQgea paQiculata CJaQeC TM#5 CONTPotHL211Little Quick Fire H\GraQgea / H\GraQgea paQiculata CLittle Quick FireC#5 CONTPotTT41TecKQ\ GloEe ArEorvitae / TKuMa occiGeQtalis 'TecKQ\ GloEe'#5 CONTGRASSESCODEQTYCOMMON / BOTANICAL NAMESIZENATIVE PLANTSSL78Little Bluestem Grass / ScKi]acK\rium scoparium#1 CONTPotPERENNIALSCODEQTYCOMMON / BOTANICAL NAMESIZENATIVE PLANTSEE46PoZ WoZ WilGEerr\ CoQeIloZer / EcKiQacea [ 'PAS702917' TM#1 CONTHP42ParGoQ Me Da\lil\ / Hemerocallis [ 'ParGoQ Me'#1 CONTNL248CatmiQt / Nepeta racemosa CLittle TitcKC#1 CONTGROUND COVERSCODEQTYCOMMON / BOTANICAL NAMESIZECS5,601 sIPrairie RestoratioQs, IQc. / CeQtral CoQservatioQ SeeG Mi[Prairie RestoratioQs, IQc. - CeQtral MN PRI CeQtral CoQservatioQ SeeG Mi[(WilGliIe HaEitat)SeeG Mi[SSNV217,902 sIPrairie RestoratioQs, IQc. / CeQtral MN PRI WooGlaQG Base WilGIloZer SeeG Mi[Prairie RestoratioQs, IQc. - CeQtral MN PRI WooGlaQG Base WilGIloZer Mi[SeeG Mi[BG52,911 sIBlue Grass BaseG / SoGCommercial graGe, locall\ groZQ, "Big Roll" preIerreGSoGPLANT SCHEDULETREESCODEQTYCOMMON / BOTANICAL NAMECONTNATIVE PLANTSAA8ArmstroQg ReG Maple / Acer ruErum 'ArmstroQg'4" Cal. B&BBS19SKiloK SplasK BircK / Betula Qigra CSKiloK SplasKC4" Cal. B&BYCP24Prairie SeQtiQel HackEerr\ / Celtis occiGeQtalis CJFS-KSU1C TM4" Cal. B&BPT214QuakiQg AspeQ / Populus tremuloiGes2.5" Cal. B&BB&BPT24QuakiQg AspeQ / Populus tremuloiGes4" Cal. B&BB&BQB15SZamp WKite Oak / Quercus Eicolor4" Cal. B&BQM5Burr Oak / Quercus macrocarpa4" Cal. B&BB&BQR15ReG Oak / Quercus ruEra4" Cal. B&BUS5St. Croi[ AmericaQ Elm / Ulmus americaQa CSt. Croi[C4" Cal. B&BB&BEVERGREEN TREESCODEQTYCOMMON / BOTANICAL NAMECONTNATIVE PLANTSJE8EasterQ ReG CeGar / JuQiperus virgiQiaQa10C B&BPG8WKite Spruce / Picea glauca10C B&BB&BORNAMENTAL TREESCODEQTYCOMMON / BOTANICAL NAMECONTNATIVE PLANTSAG22AutumQ BrilliaQce ServiceEerr\ / AmelaQcKier [ graQGiIlora CAutumQ BrilliaQceC1.5" Cal. B&BClumpCA2PagoGa DogZooG / CorQus alterQiIolia1.5" Cal. B&BB&BMP3PrairiIire CraEapple / Malus [ CPrairiIireC1.5" Cal. B&BB&BSHRUBSCODEQTYCOMMON / BOTANICAL NAMESIZENATIVE PLANTSHJ14Little Lime H\GraQgea / H\GraQgea paQiculata CJaQeC TM#5 CONTPotHL211Little Quick Fire H\GraQgea / H\GraQgea paQiculata CLittle Quick FireC#5 CONTPotTT41TecKQ\ GloEe ArEorvitae / TKuMa occiGeQtalis 'TecKQ\ GloEe'#5 CONTGRASSESCODEQTYCOMMON / BOTANICAL NAMESIZENATIVE PLANTSSL78Little Bluestem Grass / ScKi]acK\rium scoparium#1 CONTPotPERENNIALSCODEQTYCOMMON / BOTANICAL NAMESIZENATIVE PLANTSEE46PoZ WoZ WilGEerr\ CoQeIloZer / EcKiQacea [ 'PAS702917' TM#1 CONTHP42ParGoQ Me Da\lil\ / Hemerocallis [ 'ParGoQ Me'#1 CONTNL248CatmiQt / Nepeta racemosa CLittle TitcKC#1 CONTGROUND COVERSCODEQTYCOMMON / BOTANICAL NAMESIZECS5,601 sIPrairie RestoratioQs, IQc. / CeQtral CoQservatioQ SeeG Mi[Prairie RestoratioQs, IQc. - CeQtral MN PRI CeQtral CoQservatioQ SeeG Mi[(WilGliIe HaEitat)SeeG Mi[SSNV217,902 sIPrairie RestoratioQs, IQc. / CeQtral MN PRI WooGlaQG Base WilGIloZer SeeG Mi[Prairie RestoratioQs, IQc. - CeQtral MN PRI WooGlaQG Base WilGIloZer Mi[SeeG Mi[BG52,911 sIBlue Grass BaseG / SoGCommercial graGe, locall\ groZQ, "Big Roll" preIerreGSoGPLANT SCHEDULEREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONL1.0LANDSCAPE PLAN............GREENWAY VILLAS PENNSYLVANIA AVE N. & PLYMOUTH AVE N., GOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55427 7500 W 78TH ST., MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55439 RON CLARK CONSTRUCTION PROJECT ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:2119110/08/2021FINAL PUD APPLICATION SUBMITTAL11/26/2021REVISIONS........07/23/2021CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:JSRB..............COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cP R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N24904Patrick J. SarverLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDERTHE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.11/26/21Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture5000 Glenwood AvenueGolden Valley, MN 55422civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060LANDSCAPE NOTES:01" = 30'-0"30'-0"15'-0"NKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallR1.ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONECALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT AREDAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.2.WHERE SHOWN, SHRUB & PERENNIAL BEDS SHALL BE MULCHED WITH 4" DEPTH (MINIMUMAFTER INSTALLATION AND/OR TOP DRESSING OPERATIONS) OF SHREDDED CEDAR MULCH.3.ALL TREES SHALL BE MULCHED WITH SHREDDED CEDAR MULCH TO OUTER EDGE OF SAUCEROR TO EDGE OF PLANTING BED, IF APPLICABLE. ALL MULCH SHALL BE KEPT WITHIN A MINIMUMOF 2" FROM TREE TRUNK.4.IF SHOWN ON PLAN, RANDOM SIZED LIMESTONE BOULDERS COLOR AND SIZE TO COMPLIMENTNEW LANDSCAPING. OWNER TO APPROVE BOULDER SAMPLES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.5.PLANT MATERIALS SHALL CONFORM WITH THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMENSTANDARDS AND SHALL BE OF HARDY STOCK, FREE FROM DISEASE, DAMAGE ANDDISFIGURATION. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING PLUMPNESS OF PLANTMATERIAL FOR DURATION OF ACCEPTANCE PERIOD.6.UPON DISCOVERY OF A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE QUANTITY OF PLANTS SHOWN ON THESCHEDULE AND THE QUANTITY SHOWN ON THE PLAN, THE PLAN SHALL GOVERN.7.CONDITION OF VEGETATION SHALL BE MONITORED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTTHROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT. LANDSCAPE MATERIALS PART OF THECONTRACT SHALL BE WARRANTED FOR ONE (1) FULL GROWING SEASONS FROM SUBSTANTIALCOMPLETION DATE.8.ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SHALL RECEIVE 6" LAYER TOPSOIL ANDSOD AS SPECIFIED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS.9.COORDINATE LOCATION OF VEGETATION WITH UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD UTILITIES,LIGHTING FIXTURES, DOORS AND WINDOWS. CONTRACTOR SHALL STAKE IN THE FIELD FINALLOCATION OF TREES AND SHRUBS FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE LANDSCAPEARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.10.ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE WATERED AND MAINTAINED UNTIL ACCEPTANCE.11.REPAIR AT NO COST TO OWNER ALL DAMAGE RESULTING FROM LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR'SACTIVITIES.12.SWEEP AND MAINTAIN ALL PAVED SURFACES FREE OF DEBRIS GENERATED FROM LANDSCAPECONTRACTOR'S ACTIVITIES.13.REPAIR AT NO COST TO THE OWNER IRRIGATION SYSTEM DAMAGED FROM LANDSCAPECONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.14.PROVIDE SITE WIDE IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN AND INSTALLATION. SYSTEM SHALL BE FULLYPROGRAMMABLE AND CAPABLE OF ALTERNATE DATE WATERING. THE SYSTEM SHALL PROVIDEHEAD TO HEAD OR DRIP COVERAGE AND BE CAPABLE OF DELIVERING ONE INCH OFPRECIPITATION PER WEEK. SYSTEM SHALL EXTEND INTO THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY TO THEEDGE OF PAVEMENT/BACK OF CURB.15.CONTRACTOR SHALL SECURE APPROVAL OF PROPOSED IRRIGATION SYSTEM INCLUDINGPRICING FROM OWNER, PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.16.IRRIGATION SYSTEM IN NATIVE GRASS AREAS SHALL ONLY BE USED UNTIL VEGETATIONESTABLISHMENT, AT WHICH POINT IRRIGATION TO THESE AREAS SHALL BE SHUT OFF.CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEYMINIMUM LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS:1.MINIMUM LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS FOR SINGLE-FAMILY (R-1), PER SECTION 111-8:1.1.(3) TREES PER LOT, (1) OF WHICH TREE MUST BE IN THE FRONT YARD;1.2.ANY COMBINATION OF (5) SHRUBS & PERENNIALS IN EACH LOT.2.MINIMUM LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT CALCULATIONS:2.1.3 TREES PER LOT REQ'D X 7 LOTS = MIN. 21 TREES REQUIRED2.2.5 SHRUBS / PERENNIALS PER LOT REQ'D X 7 = MIN. 35 SHRUBS / PERENNIALS REQUIRED2.3.REPLACEMENT TREES CAN COUNT TOWARDS MINIMUM REQUIRED TREES.SHRUB & PERENNIAL MATERIAL NOT SHOWN ON THIS SHEET FOR GRAPHIC CLARITY.FOR LOTS 1 - 4, SEE SHEET L1.1 .FOR LOTS 5 - 7, SEE SHEET L1.2.FOR OUTLOT A PUBLIC SEATING AREA, SEE SHEET L1.3.FOR MONUMENT ENTRANCE LANDSCAPING, SEE SHEET L1.3.LOCATION OF LEGACY TREES ARE LABELED ON LANDSCAPE SHEET.REFER TO C1.2 FOR ADDITIONAL TREE INFORMATION.1/L1.32/L1.3A.TRIM LIMBS AND BRANCHES OF OVERSTORY TREES AS NECESSARY TO MAINTAINCLEAR SIGHT LINES BETWEEN THE EAST SIDE OF THE PUBLIC BENCH AREA AND THECONSERVATION SEED MIX / PRAIRIE AREA, AS INDICATED ON L1.0 PLAN VIEW.A. WOOD L A N D WI L D F L O W E R S E E D MI X, T Y P.1 - TT1 - TT3 - HP2 - TT3 - HJ3 - SL5 - NL25 - SL1 - TT5 - NL2LIMB U P T R E E S F O R VI SI BI LI T Y T O C O N S E R V A TI O N SEED A R E A WOOD L A N D WI L D F L O W E R S E E D MI X, T Y P.1 - TT1 - TT3 - HP2 - TT3 - HJ3 - SL5 - NL25 - SL1 - TT5 - NL2LIMB U P T R E E S F O R VI SI BI LI T Y T O C O N S E R V A TI O N SEED A R E A LEGA C Y T R E E, # 5 1 2 LEGA C Y T R E E, # 4 8 2 1 - TT1 - TT3 - HP3 - SL5 - HP3 - SL1 - TT3 - HP3 - TT3 - HL23 - EE1 - TT1 - TT3 - HP3 - SL5 - HP3 - SL1 - TT3 - HP3 - TT3 - HL23 - EEPLYMOUTH AVENUE 1 - TT1 - TT3 - EE3 - TT3 - HJ3 - EE3 - SL5 - NL23 - SL1 - TT3 - NL21 - TT1 - TT3 - EE3 - TT3 - HJ3 - EE3 - SL5 - NL23 - SL1 - TT3 - NL2LEGA C Y T R E E, # 4 6 4 1 - TT1 - TT3 - EE2 - TT3 - HL23 - SL5 - HP3 - SL1 - TT2 - HP1 - TT1 - TT3 - EE2 - TT3 - HL23 - SL5 - HP3 - SL1 - TT2 - HPREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONL1.1LANDSCAPE PLAN............GREENWAY VILLAS PENNSYLVANIA AVE N. & PLYMOUTH AVE N., GOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55427 7500 W 78TH ST., MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55439 RON CLARK CONSTRUCTION PROJECT ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:2119110/08/2021FINAL PUD APPLICATION SUBMITTAL11/26/2021REVISIONS........07/23/2021CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:JSRB..............COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cP R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N24904Patrick J. SarverLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDERTHE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.11/26/21Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture5000 Glenwood AvenueGolden Valley, MN 55422civilsitegroup.com 612-615-006001" = 10'-0"10'-0"5'-0"NKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRLOT 1 - LANDSCAPING1" = 10'LOT 2 - LANDSCAPING1" = 10'LOT 3 - LANDSCAPING1" = 10'123LOT 4 - LANDSCAPING1" = 10'4 2 1 - TT3 - HP1 - TT1 - TT1 - TT3 - HP3 - TT3 - EE5 - HL23 - SL5 - NL24 - SL1 - TT3 - NL25 - HJ3 - TT3 - EE3 - HP1 - TT3 - SL5 - HP3 - SL3 - SL1 - TT3 - HP1 - TT1 - TT1 - TT3 - HP3 - TT3 - EE5 - HL23 - SL5 - NL24 - SL1 - TT3 - NL25 - HJ3 - TT3 - EE3 - HP1 - TT3 - SL5 - HP3 - SL3 - SL2 1 - TT3 - HP1 - TT3 - TT3 - EE5 - HL23 - SL5 - NL24 - SL1 - TT3 - NL21 - TT3 - HP1 - TT3 - TT3 - EE5 - HL23 - SL5 - NL24 - SL1 - TT3 - NL2LEGACY TREE, # 460 1 - TT1 - TT3 - EE3 - TT3 - HJ3 - SL5 - HP3 - SL1 - TT2 - HP1 - TT1 - TT3 - EE3 - TT3 - HJ3 - SL5 - HP3 - SL1 - TT2 - HPREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONL1.2LANDSCAPE PLAN............GREENWAY VILLAS PENNSYLVANIA AVE N. & PLYMOUTH AVE N., GOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55427 7500 W 78TH ST., MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55439 RON CLARK CONSTRUCTION PROJECT ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:2119110/08/2021FINAL PUD APPLICATION SUBMITTAL11/26/2021REVISIONS........07/23/2021CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:JSRB..............COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cP R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N24904Patrick J. SarverLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDERTHE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.11/26/21Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture5000 Glenwood AvenueGolden Valley, MN 55422civilsitegroup.com 612-615-006001" = 10'-0"10'-0"5'-0"NKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallR5LOT 5 - LANDSCAPING1" = 10'6LOT 6 - LANDSCAPING1" = 10'7LOT 7 - LANDSCAPING1" = 10' 5.0'8.0'15.0'R5.0'R5.0'20.0'13 - EE16 - NL223 - SL5' WIDE SOD /MOW STRIPEXISTINGSIDEWALK 5.0'8.0'15.0'R5.0'R5.0'20.0'13 - EE16 - NL223 - SL5' WIDE SOD /MOW STRIPEXISTINGSIDEWALK6 - SL12 - EE6 - NL26 - SL12 - EE6 - NL2REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONL1.3LANDSCAPE PLANNOTES & DETAILS............GREENWAY VILLAS PENNSYLVANIA AVE N. & PLYMOUTH AVE N., GOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55427 7500 W 78TH ST., MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55439 RON CLARK CONSTRUCTION PROJECT ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:2119110/08/2021FINAL PUD APPLICATION SUBMITTAL11/26/2021REVISIONS........07/23/2021CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:JSRB..............COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cP R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N24904Patrick J. SarverLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDERTHE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.11/26/21Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture5000 Glenwood AvenueGolden Valley, MN 55422civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060Know what'sbelow.before you dig.CallROUTLOT A - PUBLIC BENCH & BIKE AREA1" = 5'101" = 5'-0"5'-0"2'-6"NSHELTERED PUBLIC BENCH DETAILNTS3BIKE RACK DETAILNTS4MONUMENT ENTRANCE LANDSCAPING1" = 5'201" = 5'-0"5'-0"2'-6"NTRIM LIMBS AND BRANCHES OF OVERSTORY TREESAS NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN CLEAR SIGHT LINESBETWEEN THE EAST SIDE OF THE PUBLIC BENCHAREA AND THE CONSERVATION SEED MIX /PRAIRIE AREA, AS INDICATED. REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONL1.4LANDSCAPE PLANNOTES & DETAILS............GREENWAY VILLAS PENNSYLVANIA AVE N. & PLYMOUTH AVE N., GOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55427 7500 W 78TH ST., MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55439 RON CLARK CONSTRUCTION PROJECT ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:2119110/08/2021FINAL PUD APPLICATION SUBMITTAL11/26/2021REVISIONS........07/23/2021CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:JSRB..............COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cP R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N24904Patrick J. SarverLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDERTHE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.11/26/21Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture5000 Glenwood AvenueGolden Valley, MN 55422civilsitegroup.com 612-615-00601.ENTIRE SITE SHALL BE FULLY IRRIGATED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT IRRIGATION SHOP DRAWINGS FOR REVIEWAND APPROVAL BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.2.SEE MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR IRRIGATION WATER, METER, AND POWERCONNECTIONS.3.CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND/ABOVE GROUND FACILITIES PRIOR TO ANYEXCAVATION/INSTALLATION. ANY DAMAGE TO UNDERGROUND/ABOVE GROUND FACILITIES SHALL BE THERESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH CORRECTING DAMAGES SHALL BE BORNEENTIRELY BY THE CONTRACTOR.4.SERVICE EQUIPMENT AND INSTALLATION SHALL BE PER LOCAL UTILITY COMPANY STANDARDS AND SHALL BE PERNATIONAL AND LOCAL CODES. EXACT LOCATION OF SERVICE EQUIPMENT SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THELANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR EQUIVALENT AT THE JOB SITE.5.CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH LOCAL UTILITY COMPANY FOR THE PROPOSED ELECTRICAL SERVICE ANDMETERING FACILITIES.6.IRRIGATION WATER LINE CONNECTION SIZE IS 1-12" AT BUILDING. VERIFY WITH MECHANICAL PLANS.COVAGE.7.ALL MAIN LINES SHALL BE 18" BELOW FINISHED GRADE.8.ALL LATERAL LINES SHALL BE 12" BELLOW FINISHED GRADE.9.ALL EXPOSED PVC RISERS, IF ANY, SHALL BE GRAY IN COLOR.10.CONTRACTOR SHALL LAY ALL SLEEVES AND CONDUIT AT 2'-0" BELOW THE FINISHED GRADE OF THE TOP OF PAVEMENT.EXTEND SLEEVES TO 2'-0" BEYOND PAVEMENT.11.CONTRACTOR SHALL MARK THE LOCATION OF ALL SLEEVES AND CONDUIT WITH THE SLEEVING MATERIAL "ELLED" TO2'-0" ABOVE FINISHED GRADE AND CAPPED.12.FABRICATE ALL PIPE TO MANUFACTURE'S SPECIFICATIONS WITH CLEAN AND SQUARE CUT JOINTS. USE QUALITY GRADEPRIMER AND SOLVENT CEMENT FORMULATED FOR INTENDED TYPE OF CONNECTION.13.BACKFILL ALL TRENCHES WITH SOIL FREE OF SHARP OBJECTS AND DEBRIS.14.ALL VALVE BOXES AND COVERS SHALL BE BLACK IN COLOR.15.GROUP VALVE BOXES TOGETHER FOR EASE WHEN SERVICE IS REQUIRED. LOCATE IN PLANT BED AREAS WHENEVERPOSSIBLE.16.IRRIGATION CONTROLLER LOCATION SHALL BE VERIFIED ON-SITE WITH OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE.17.CONTROL WIRES: 14 GAUGE DIRECT BURIAL, SOLID COPPER IRRIGATION WIRE. RUN UNDER MAIN LINE. USEMOISTURE-PROOF SPLICES AND SPLICE ONLY AT VALVES OR PULL BOXES. RUN SEPARATE HOT AND COMMON WIRE TOEACH VALVE AND ONE (1) SPARE WIRE AND GROUND TO FURTHEST VALVE FROM CONTROLLER. LABEL OR COLOR CODEALL WIRES.18.AVOID OVER SPRAY ON BUILDINGS, PAVEMENT, WALLS AND ROADWAYS BY INDIVIDUALLY ADJUSTING RADIUS OR ARCON SPRINKLER HEADS AND FLOW CONTROL ON AUTOMATIC VALVE.19.ADJUST PRESSURE REGULATING VALVES FOR OPTIMUM PRESSURE ON SITE.20.USE SCREENS ON ALL HEADS.21.A SET OF AS-BUILT DRAWINGS SHALL BE MAINTAINED ON-SITE AT ALL TIMES IN AN UPDATED CONDITION.22.ALL PIPE 3" AND OVER SHALL HAVE THRUST BLOCKING AT EACH TURN.23.ALL AUTOMATIC REMOTE CONTROL VALVES WILL HAVE 3" MINIMUM DEPTH OF 3/4" WASHED GRAVEL UNDERNEATHVALVE AND VALVE BOX. GRAVEL SHALL EXTENT 3" BEYOND PERIMETER OF VALVE BOX.24.THERE SHALL BE 3" MINIMUM SPACE BETWEEN BOTTOM OF VALVE BOX COVER AND TOP OF VALVE STRUCTURE.IRRIGATION NOTES:FACE OF BUILDING, WALL, OR STRUCTUREMIN. 3" LAYER OF ROCK MULCH AS SPECIFIED. PROVIDE SAMPLE TOLANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATIONFINISHED GRADECOMPACTED SUBGRADEWATER PERMEABLE GEOTEXTILE FABRIC AS SPECIFIED24" - VERIFY W/ PLANAGGREGATE MAINTANENCE STRIPN T SSTAKED LANDSCAPE EDGER AS SPECIFIED, SEE MANUFACTURER'SINSTRUCTIONS AND SPECS. FOR INSTALLATION AND PLACEMENTSLOPE - MIN. 2%, MAX. 5:1VERIFY W/ GRADING PLAN1Know what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRPERENNIAL BED PLANTINGN T SPLANT TOP OF ROOTBALL 1-2" ABOVE ABOVESURROUNDING GRADEROOTS AT OUTER EDGE OF ROOTBALL LOOSENED TOENSURE PROPER BACKFILL-TO-ROOT CONTACTSLOPE SIDES OF HOLE OR VERTICAL SIDES AT EDGE OFPLANTING BEDEXISTING GRADEROCK OR ORGANIC MULCH, SEE GENERAL LANDSCAPENOTES AND PLAN NOTES FOR MULCH TYPE. KEEPMULCH MIN. 2" FROM PLANT STEMBACKFILL AS PER SPECIFICATIONDO NOT EXCAVATE BELOW ROOTBALL.SIZE VARIESSEE LANDSCAPE PLANMODIFY EXCAVATION BASED ON LOCATION OF PLANTMATERIAL AND DESIGN OF BEDS OR OVERALL PLANTPLACEMENT4DECIDUOUS & CONIFEROUS SHRUB PLANTINGN T SPRUNE AS FIELD DIRECTED BY THE LANDSCAPEARCHITECT TO IMPROVE APPEARANCE (RETAINNORMAL SHAPE FOR SPECIES)PLANT TOP OF ROOTBALL 1-2" ABOVE ABOVESURROUNDING GRADEROOTS AT OUTER EDGE OF ROOTBALL LOOSENED TOENSURE PROPER BACKFILL-TO-ROOT CONTACTSLOPE SIDES OF HOLE OR VERTICAL SIDES AT EDGE OFPLANTING BEDEXISTING GRADEROCK OR ORGANIC MULCH, SEE GENERAL LANDSCAPENOTES AND PLAN NOTES FOR MULCH TYPE. KEEPMULCH MIN. 2" FROM PLANT TRUNKBACKFILL AS PER SPECIFICATIONDO NOT EXCAVATE BELOW ROOTBALL.THREE TIMES WIDTHOF ROOTBALLRULE OF THUMB - MODIFY EXCAVATION BASED ONLOCATION OF PLANT MATERIAL AND DESIGN OF BEDSOR OVERALL PLANT PLACEMENT3THREE TIMES WIDTHOF ROOTBALLDECIDUOUS & CONIFEROUS TREE PLANTINGN T SPRUNE AS FIELD DIRECTED BY THE LANDSCAPEARCHITECT TO IMPROVE APPEARANCE (RETAINNORMAL TREE SHAPE)THREE 2"X4"X8' WOODEN STAKES, STAINED BROWNWITH TWO STRANDS OF WIRE TWISTED TOGETHER.STAKES SHALL BE PLACED AT 120° TO ONE ANOTHER.WIRE SHALL BE THREADED THROUGH NYLONSTRAPPING WITH GROMMETS. ALTERNATE STABILIZINGMETHODS MAY BE PROPOSED BY CONTRACTOR.TRUNK FLARE JUNCTION: PLANT TREE 1"-2" ABOVEEXISTING GRADEMULCH TO OUTER EDGE OF SAUCER OR TO EDGE OFPLANTING BED, IF APPLICABLE. ROCK OR ORGANICMULCH, SEE GENERAL LANDSCAPE NOTES AND PLANNOTES FOR MULCH TYPE. KEEP MULCH MIN. 2" FROMPLANT TRUNKEXISTING GRADECUT AND REMOVE BURLAP FROM TOP 1/3 OF ROOTBALL. IF NON-BIODEGRADABLE, REMOVE COMPLETELYSLOPE SIDES OF HOLE OR VERTICAL SIDES AT EDGE OFPLANTING BEDBACKFILL AS SPECIFIEDCOMPACT BOTTOM OF PIT, TYP.RULE OF THUMB - MODIFY EXCAVATION BASED ONLOCATION OF PLANT MATERIAL AND DESIGN OF BEDSOR OVERALL PLANT PLACEMENT2 VILLA HOME BROOKS Main Level 1966 sq ft Lower Level 1591 sq ft TOTAL 3557 sq ft 2016© Ron Clark Construction & Design. All rights reserved. Do not copy or allow these prints to be copied. Floor plans shown are for illustrative purposes only and subject to change. Please see our sales consultant for details. 2/18/16 VILLA HOME JONDAHL Main Level 2042 sq ft Lower Level 1648 sq ft TOTAL 3690 sq ft 2016© Ron Clark Construction & Design. All rights reserved. Do not copy or allow these prints to be copied. Floor plans shown are for illustrative purposes only and subject to change. Please see our sales consultant for details. 2/18/16 ALEXANDER Main Level 1940 sq ft Lower Level 1735 sq ft TOTAL 3675 sq ft 2016© Ron Clark Construction & Design. All rights reserved. Do not copy or allow these prints to be copied. Floor plans shown are for illustrative purposes only and subject to change. Please see our sales consultant for details. 2/18/16 VILLA HOME VILLA HOME 2018© Ron Clark Construction & Design. All rights reserved. Do not copy or allow these prints to be copied. Floor plans shown are for illustrative purposes only and subject to change. Please see our sales consultant for details. 4/2018 RAMSEY 2 Main Level 1668 sq ft Lower Level 1244 sq ft TOTAL 2912 sq ft OPT Sun Room 155 sq ft OPT Flex Room 161 sq ft Minnesota’s Green Pathsm is an energy and green building program for the residential construction industry. Launched by the Builders Association of the Twin Cities (BATC) in late 2011, MN Green Path provides builders with a realistic approach to building energy-efficient and sustainable homes. The program offers two green certification levels (advanced and master), plus a base energy tested level which is on the way to becoming an industry standard. One of the reasons for Green Path’s popularity is its exclusive Home Performance Report (HPR). The HPR is at the heart of MN Green Path, providing home buyers with test results from third- party, independent RESNET energy raters in an easy-to- understand and compare format, like a new vehicle’s MPG window sticker. ENERGY TESTED HERS Index52 This home is 48% m o r e e n e r g y efficient than the H E R S reference home built t o c o d e 1. Home Performan c e R e p o r t MN GREEN PAT H | W W W . M N G R E E N P A T H . O R G Home Address: XXXX Home Stree t Minnetrista MN 5 5 3 3 1 Square Feet: 4630Bedrooms: 5Baths: 5 Builder: Building Companywww.buildername.c o m AVG OLDER HOME NET ZERO HOME 130+ 0 52 1The RESNET Home E n e r g y R a t i n g S y s t e m ( H E R S ) s c o r e r a t e s h o m e s a g a i n s t a n i n d e x o f t h e c o d e r e f e r e n c e h o m e o f 1 0 0 . T h e l o w e r t h e score, the more ene r g y efficient the home. O l d e r h o m e s o f t e n s c o r e 1 3 0 o r h i g h e r . I n M i n n e s o t a t o d a y , n e w h o m e s b u i l t t o c o d e g e n e r a l l y t e s t a b o u t 8 0 . 2The Air Changes Per H o u r a t 5 0 P a s c a l s ( A C H 5 0 ) i s t h e i n d e x u s e d i n b l o w e r d o o r t e s t i n g t o i n d i c a t e h o w a i r t i g h t a h o m e i s . A s with HERS, the lowe r t h e s c o r e the more energy effici e n t t h e h o m e . Minnesota’s Green P a t h i s a p r o g r a m o f t h e B u i l d e r s A s s o c i a t i o n o f t h e T w i n C i t i e s . Serial #014250 WORST 10 1.0 ACH50 BEST These results reflect Air Changes per Hour of measured air flow 2. 0 1.0 AVGMN NEW HOME CODE REFERENCE HOME Which one are you? •It’s the environment, stupid. Building a new home for you will mean recycled materials, super-energy construction, built-in recycling bins, maybe even a gray water reservoir and definitely solar a panels. •It’s all about the money. When you build you’ll be looking at the bottom line, today and into the future. Yes, there will be energy-saving construction to keep your future bills low, and you’ll calculate the return on investment for every single choice you make. In all reality, most of us fall somewhere in between those two extremes. And that’s OK. The beauty of Minnesota’s Green Path is that it is for everyone, from passionate environmentalist to bean-counter extraordinaire. Green Path boasts “radical transparency,” so no matter what route you choose through the program, you’ll receive an easily-understood Home Performance Report (HPR) with details about the efforts you’ve made. And, we’re confident this will make your home even more valuable in years to come. Meeting More Home Buyer’s Needs It’s very clear from study after study that today’s home buyers want some level of improved energy efficiency, but still don’t want to pay too much for green features. Buyers today are also information starved. They want to know everything they can about a product before they buy it. MN’s Green Path succeeds in bringing these two realities together beautifully with a green-build program anchored on choice and on providing the missing data to help you make home buying decisions that are right for you. When you buy a new home, you’ll spend a lot of time balancing your choices. You can compare prices between neighborhoods, home styles, size and number of rooms. Do you want a big neighborhood or a more intimate setting? Do you want the value of a two-story or the convenience of a rambler? Will you exchange extra square footage for more luxurious finishings? But understanding the mechanical side of a new home isn’t quite so simple. Just how do you measure a home’s energy performance factors, its indoor environmental quality or its durability? How a home performs is a combination of many factors, from construction materials and techniques, to equipment choices and R-values (the unit thermal resistance, generally in walls and ceilings). And that’s where Green Path’s Home Performance Report (HPR) and energy testing comes in. It removes the mystery of how well all of those variables work together, with a test score that can be compared with others. Just like the MPG window sticker on a new car, the HPR helps you make better choices about your own family’s needs and wants. You and your builder choose the level of energy efficiency and green features appropriate to your needs and budget, and Minnesota’s Green Path ensures complete transparency — documenting the home’s HERS score and green features for all to see on the Green Path HPR. Minnesota’s Green Path, The Right Path for Minnesota Home Buyers…All of You. The Three Levels of Minnesota’s Green Path Energy Tested: The first level of MN’s Green Path is Energy Tested. These homes have been tested and rated by a third-party, independent RESNET Rater. Each receives an attractive Green Path HPR with the HERS and ACH50 (air exchange index) test results. For those buyers who want more efficiency and environmental sensitivity in the construction of their new home, MN’s Green Path offers two green certification options. These levels require a higher level of energy and green choices. Certification requirements include: Advanced Certified: A new home with a HERS score of no more than 55 (the average Minnesota code-built home currently scores 80). The home must also earn 5 total points in Energy Efficiency, 5 points in Indoor Environmental Quality, 5 points in one of Water Conservation, Resource Management or Site/Development disciplines, and 5 points from any elective checklist. Master Certified: A new home with a HERS score of no more than 50 (the average Minnesota code-built home currently scores 80). The home must also earn 10 total points in each of the five areas of green construction: Energy Efficiency, Indoor Environmental Quality, Water Conservation, Resource Management and Site/ Development. Advanced and Certified points are offered for use of green construction materials, techniques and products per the Green Path checklist, which you can find online at www.MNGreenPath.org. Your Path to Certification:HERS Index52 AVG OLDER HOME NET ZERO HOME 130+0 52 AVG MN NEW HOME 60 OR LESS ADVANCED CERTIFED REQ. 50 OR LESS MASTER CERTIFED REQ. CODE REFERENCE HOME Since not just new home buyers are interested in energy and green, MN’s Green Path has brought its unique combination of choice and documentation to remodeling. Like the new-home program, MN’s Green Path for Remodelers begins with energy testing, in this case an energy audit to understand the home’s current energy efficiency. Then your remodeler will work with you to determine the best remodeling solutions to meet your energy-saving and green goals. Once your remodeling is complete, MN’s Green Path will provide you with documentation about the energy and green features that have been incorporated into your home in the form of a Home Performance Report (HPR). Each HPR clearly denotes the home’s energy ratings (if the project included testing) and any green features included in the remodeling — placing your home on the Green Path, now and for future renovations. As we’ve said all along, MN’s Green Path doesn’t always have to be radically green, but it is always radically transparent. Make sure your next home includes a MN’s Green Path Home Performance Report so you can compare all of your choices. More information is available at mngreenpath.org. And remember to ask your contractor to add MN Green Path when you build or remodel. Minnesota’s Green Path for Remodeling, Too! 2015 SPONSORS Trailblazer Sponsors: Pioneer Sponsors: Visionary Sponsor: Minnesota’s Green Path is a program of the Builders Association of the Twin Cities implemented in partnership with Residential Science Resources, LLC. THE EVOLUTION OF INSULATION ™ CERTIFIED PEND Low flow faucets Programmable thermostat installed Install rigid ducting ENERGY STAR® appliances High efficiency wall insulation Your HPR framed and displayed to make all your neighbors green with envy. HPR = Home Performance Report OPTIONAL ELECTIVE: geothermal system installed During construction, on-site disposal with vendor who recycles Required Optional Elective BRINGING SEXY BACK TO HVAC greenMI NNE SO TA’ S Your very own Green Path “Bringing Sexy Back to HVAC” magnet. OPTIONAL ELECTIVE: high efficiency furnace High efficiency lighting in 50% of home 50% SFI/FSC/CSA certified lumber R-10 exterior foundation insulation Happy homeowners blazing the Path may feel the overwelming urge to display their excitement. Ductwork in exterior wall cavities sealed with R-10 rigid foam Air seal around window with low expansion foam insulation green EF F ICIE NTD URAB LEHO ME S M INN E SOTA’S CERTIFIEDPENDING HERS Index HERS Index56 130 120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Existing Typical Home Net ZeroEnergy HomeYour Home You Are Here MN’s Green PathCERTIFIED MN’s Green PathADVANCEDCERTIFIED MN’s Green PathMASTER CERTIFIED ■56 HERS Index ■Blower door test result of ≤0.3 cfm per sq ft■ENERGY STAR Certied (or better) Dishwasher,Clothes washer, Refrigerator■Energy ecient lighting in 50% of whole house(CFL)■High Eciency Exterior Wall Insulation (R-21)■High Eciency Foundation Insulation (R-10)■Low Expansion Foam Insulation around outsidewindow and door units■Rigid foam in all exterior wall cavities(R-10)■Programmable thermostat Indoor Environmental QualityEnergy Efficiency ■Home ventilated mechanically for 48 hours prior tooccupancy■Gas combustion equipment sealed/direct vented■Attach garage sealed: air barrier, common walls,ceiling, and penetrations all sealed prior to insulation■Gasketed door to living space■Provide capillary breaks for moisture management:between top of footings and bottom of foundation wall; below slabs; and where cementitious products connect to framing material■Building cavities are not used as part of duct work forsupplies and returns.■Foundation waterproofed from footing to sill plate Minnesota’s Green Path is a program of the Builders Association of the Twin Cities implemented in partnership with Residential Science Resources, LLC.Certied pending means that your builder is on path to certication which is in process and awaits nal certication approval. ■ All lavatory faucets are low ow(1.5 gallon/minute) ■FSC/SFI/CSA Certied lumber in 50% of house■On-site disposal with vendor who recycles Water Conservation Resource Management Site/Development This home is 44% more energy efficient than the HERS reference home built to code.Less Efficient Most Efficient For greater definition of these features, visit mnGreenPath.org. Your home’s place on the Green Path: Home Performance ReportMN GREEN PATH | WWW.MNGREENPATH.ORG Home Address: 11317 Basswood Lane, Dayton, MNSquare Feet: 3400 • Bedrooms: 4 • Baths: 3.5Builder: Mega Homeswww.mega-homes.com The Anatomy of a Green PathSM Home Energy efficiency and indoor environmental quality are central to MN Green Path certification. But as we all know – a home is so much more than a system. It’s where we cook, relax, shower and more. MN Green Path makes your home come alive (and you save a few bucks too). The chart below shows you how. ADVANCED CERTIFIED 2.2ACH50 2.2 HERS Index53 This home is 47% more energy efficient than the HERS reference home built to code.1 AVG OLDER HOME NET ZERO HOME 130+0 53 AVG MN NEW HOME CODE REFERENCE HOME Home Address: 15450 Leona Lane, Minnetonka MN 55345 Square Feet: 3,536 | Bedrooms: 3 | Baths: 2.5 Builder: Ron Clark Construction ronclark.com 1The RESNET Home Energy Rating System (HERS) score rates homes against an index of the code reference home of 100. The lower the score, the more energy efficient the home. Older homes often score 130 or higher. In Minnesota today, new homes built to code generally test about 80. 2The Air Changes Per Hour at 50 Pascals (ACH50) is the index used in blower door testing to indicate how airtight a home is. As with HERS, the lower the score the more energy efficient the home. Minnesota’s Green Path is a program of the Builders Association of the Twin Cities.Houserater #47442 Your home’s place on the Green Path: MN’s Green Path ENERGY TESTED Typical Existing Home MN’s Green Path ADVANCED CERTIFIED MN’s Green Path MASTER CERTIFIED You Are Here New Home Your HomeYour home’s place on the Green Path: These results reflect Air Changes per Hour of measured air flow. 2 WORST BEST 10 0 Home Performance Report MN GREEN PATH | WWW.MNGREENPATH.ORG Energy Efficiency n HERS Index 53 n Blower door test result of ≤0.3 cfm per sq ft n Systems approach to home design used n Bottom plates of exterior walls sealed to subfloor n Foundation and mudsill sealed n Cantilevered floors sealed above supporting walls n Air conditioning unit properly installed n No wood burning fireplace present inside the thermal envelope n ENERGY STAR certified clothes washer, dishwasher Indoor Environmental Quality n Patio slabs, walks, and driveway sloped minimum 1/8” per foot away from house n Garage floors sloped minimum 1/8” per foot toward main vehicle entry doorway, or integrated floor drains installed n 4” min perforated foundation drain with 3/4” of gravel and filter fabric installed at OUTSIDE perimeter of footings n 4” min perforated foundation drain with 3/4” of gravel and filter fabric installed at INSIDE perimeter of footings n Water-based waterproofing system used on below-grade walls n Recessed light fixtures sealed to drywall with gasket, caulk, or foam n Heat Recovery Ventilator (HRV) or Energy Recovery Ventilator (ERV) installed n Exterior envelope sealed using gasket or acoustical sealant at all foundation, wall-to-wall, or floor-to-wall intersections n Basement has foundation drainage system inside and outside with sump pump, or tied to a drainage outlet n Carpet, adhesives, and cushion qualify for CRI Green Label Plus or Green Label Testing program n Local exhaust ventilation to outdoors installed for baths, kitchen, clothes dryers, central vacuum system, etc. n Supply boots sealed to floor or wall Land n Home built on infill site n Home built in an area where housing density averages more than 4 single-family homes per acre n No heritage trees removed on the home site n Home within 5 miles of park- and-ride location n Home within 1/2 mile of bike route n Excavated soil kept on-site n Efforts taken to restore ecosystem damaged in construction n Each tree removed from construction site replaced with two (or more) trees n Home faces south to maximize ambient light Resource Management n Decking or patio material made from recycled content n Roofing material with minimum 25% recycled content used n Construction waste sorted on or off site and recycled as appropriate n Recycling center installed with homeowner use with minimum of two sorting bins n Reusable footings and foundation forms used n Flexible ductwork installed without excess coils or loops n Three of the following items recycled or reclaimed: wall coverings, floor coverings, countertop materials, millwork, or cabinets n Three of the following items 50% locally sourced (within 500 miles): cabinets, interior doors and trim, millwork, windows, flooring, shingles/roofing, PEX tubing, countertops n Materials installed which protect waterproof membrane, and function as hydrostatic pressure release Water Management n Landscape plan promotes water absorption n Irrigation system design zones turf and bedding areas separately n Drip irrigation system installed n Installed drip irrigation system has moisture/rain sensor n Soil tested for nutrient level and structure n As a result of test, soil amended to achieve optimal nutrient level and structure n At least 3” of mulch applied to all planting beds n Showers each have no more than one shower head n Erosion control plan designed by licensed engineer n Irrigation system designed by EPA water-sense certified professional Insulation FeaturesInsulation Features Worst Insulation Grade III/NR Rim Grade: I Ceiling Flat R = 49.0 (Grade III/NR) Vaulted Ceiling R = 49.0 Above Grade Walls R = 21.0 (Grade II) Foundation Walls R = 15.0 (Grade III) Framed Floors R = 40.0 (Grade III/NR) Slab R = 10.0 Edge, 10.0 Under (Grade III/NR) Duct Uninsulated Window U = 0.290, SHGC = 0.330 Blower Door Test ResultsBlower Door Test Results Tested CFM50 1,280 CFM50/ft 2 surface area 0.17 CFM50/ft 2 floor area 0.37 ACH50 2.17 Ventilation Flow Test ResultsVentilation Flow Test Results Target Flow (CFM)Unknown Actual Flow (CFM)0 Rated Flow (CFM)0.0 Duct Leakage to Outside 15 Cost of Services:Cost of Services: Energy Rebate:Energy Rebate: Rater Rebate:Rater Rebate: $1,150.00 $125.00 $0.00 Your Cost:Your Cost:$1,025.00$1,025.00 **** Building CodeBuilding Code File NumberFile Number Site Walk DateSite Walk Date MN Code #47442 2015-09-03 NONO 5353 51.54%51.54% Che cklis tsChe cklis ts Comple te dComple te d No Che cklis ts S igne dChe cklis ts S igne d No Me e ts Te s tingMe e ts Te s ting S tandardsS tandards Yes ENERGY STAR RequirementsENERGY STAR Requirements HERS IndexHERS Index RESNET Ratings provide a relative energy use index called the HERS Index, which represents the home's energy usage as a percentage of the energy usage of the "American Standard Building." Beats 2006 IECC standard byBeats 2006 IECC standard by 0 TBC Failures need correcting 3 Issues could use improvement 4 Exceptional building practices identified HomeHome 15450 Leona Ln Minnetonka, MN 55345 BuilderBuilder Ron Clark Construction & Design 7500 West 78th Street Edina, MN 55439 ModelModel Custom Type: Single-family detached Size: 3475 ft2 HeatHeat CoolingCooling Hot WaterHot Water VentilationVentilation ThermostatThermostat EfficiencyEfficiency 96.1 (AFUE)14.0 (SEER)0.67 Brand / MakeBrand / Make Daikin Daikin AO Smith Venmar Honeywell ModelModel DM96VC0803BNAA DX13SN0361AB GPVX 75L 200 Venmar Honeywell SizeSize 80.0 BTU 36.0 BTU 75 Gal Final Testing and Completion Report (SV3) ** Home has not be e n ve rifie d comple te . ** Home has not be e n ve rifie d comple te . Re bate s pe nding ve rification.Re bate s pe nding ve rification. S ite Walk Date : 20 15-0 9 -0 3S ite Walk Date : 20 15-0 9 -0 3 Ho us e r a te r Ho me ID #47442Ho us e r a te r Ho me ID #47442 R e s i d e nti a l S c i e nc e R e s o ur c e s , LLC | S i te Wa l k D a te : 2 0 1 5 -0 9 -0 3R e s i d e nti a l S c i e nc e R e s o ur c e s , LLC | S i te Wa l k D a te : 2 0 1 5 -0 9 -0 3 p a g e p a g e 11 o f o f 88 Energy Efficiency • HERS index of 70 or better • Blower door test result of ≤0.3 cfm50 per sq. ft. of building enclosure or lower. • ENERGY STAR Certified (or better) dishwasher, clothes washer, refrigerator, if installed. • Install energy efficient lighting such as CFL, or LED hard-wired fixtures in 50% of whole house. • Above grade exterior wall insulation must be R-21 or better and installed to Grade II of the Resnet Standards (Refer to 2009 IECC). • Foundation insulation minimum R-10 rigid foam exterior insulation or equivalent. • Air seal around outside of window and door units with low expansion foam insulation (maintain drainage void at base of window). • All ductwork installed in exterior wall cavities must have a minimum of sealed R-10 rigid foam installed along the exterior wall of the cavity. • Must install programmable thermostat. Indoor Environmental Quality • Mechanical ventilation of home for 48 hours prior to occupancy. • All gas combustion equipment must be sealed or direct vented. • Isolate attached garages: install air barrier, seal common walls, ceiling and penetrations prior to insulating. Provide gasketed door to living spaces. • May not use building cavities as a part of the duct work for supplies and returns (i.e. cannot use panning of joist or wall cavities for air supply or return system). • Foundation waterproofed – from footing to sill plate. Water Conservation • Install all faucets or add aerators with low flow. (1.5 gl/mn) Resource Management • On two of the major elements of the building – walls, roof or floor – or in 50% of project – use FSC, SFI, or CSA certified wood for wood and wood- based materials and products. • On site disposal with vendor who recycles. Other • BATC Membership or other Local Home Builder Association Membership. • Attend program orientation and on-going annual updates. • 3 elective points in energy. • 2 elective points in indoor environmental quality Base Certification Requirements BETA V2 ©MN Green Path www.mngreenpath.org [1/12] ORDINANCE NO. 725 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE Approval of Final Plan of Development Greenway Villas P.U.D. No. 126 Ron Clark Construction, Applicant The City Council for the City of Golden Valley hereby ordains as follows: Section 1. City Code Chapter 113 entitled “Zoning” is amended in Section 113- 55, Subd. (b), and Section 113-123, by approving the Final Plan of Development for Planned Unit Development (P.U.D.) 126 thereby allowing the applicant to construct a 7- unit single-family housing development on a portion of the property at 7001 Golden Valley Road. This PUD is subject to all of the terms of the permit to be issued including, but not limited to, the following specific conditions: 1. The plans prepared by Ron Clark Construction, dated November 3 and 4, 2021, shall become part of this approval. 2. The plans are subject to the review and approval of the Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission. 3. The required park dedication fee shall be paid prior to the release of the final plat. 4. The Final Plat shall include “PUD No. 126” in its title. 5. Final Construction Plans and cost estimates for the site and public improvements must be submitted to the City for review and approval. 6. Details as to the construction of site and public improvements shall be finalized prior to the consideration of approval of the development agreement and final plat, and are subject to the approval of the City Engineer. 7. All required easements and agreements shall be dedicated or executed prior to the release of the final plat, including but not limited to drainage and utility easements, public use and access easements, development agreement, escrow and deposit agreement for public improvements, and conservation easements. 8. The impervious surface area on each of the residential lots shall be limited to listed square footage in the plans dated November 4, 2021, in order to preserve open space within the shoreland area and to remain consistent with the stormwater calculations that determined the design of the stormwater management facilities. 9. Homes within the PUD will be restricted to a single story above grade as measured from the front yard, with a maximum height of 25 ft. 10. Overhead power adjacent to and within the development must be buried as well as all utilities serving the site; joint trench for private utilities is preferred to maximize efficient use of the right-of-way. 11. Sanitary sewer main in Pennsylvania Avenue must be lined for I&I compliance and any existing sanitary sewer stubs to the site must be abandoned. 12. Applicant shall submit HOA documents and all other private easements, declarations, covenants, and restrictions for the development prior to approval of the final plat. In addition, the Council makes the following findings pursuant to City Code Section 113-123, Subd. (c)(2): 1. Quality Site Planning. The PUD plan is tailored to the specific characteristics of the site and achieves a higher quality of site planning and design than generally expected under conventional provisions of the ordinance. By utilizing the PUD process, the applicant has been able to preserve large areas of open space and reduce impacts on neighboring properties. 2. Preservation. The PUD plan preserves and protects substantial desirable portions of the site’s characteristics, open space and sensitive environmental features including steep slopes, trees, scenic views, creeks, wetlands, and open waters. The proposed project protects the area around Bassett Creek with a newly established conservation easement and tree replacement will result in greater species biodiversity on the site. 3. Efficient – Effective. The PUD plan includes efficient and effective use (which includes preservation) of the land. Clustering the homes makes effective use of the land and preserves more contiguous open space in the area near Bassett Creek. 4. Consistency. The PUD Plan results in development compatible with adjacent uses and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and redevelopment plans and goals. The redevelopment is of a consistent density with surrounding homes, and the focus on restoration of natural areas is in line with a number of Comprehensive Plan goals. 5. General Health. The PUD plan is consistent with preserving and improving the general health, safety and general welfare of the people of the City. The redevelopment has been designed in order to minimize impacts on both the surrounding residential properties and Bassett Creek to the south. 6. Meets Requirements. The PUD plan meets the PUD Intent and Purpose provision and all other PUD ordinance provisions. The flexibility provided by the PUD allows for a unique housing development, with a stronger focus on protections for Bassett Creek than would be feasible through by-right subdivision. Section 2. The tracts of land affected by this ordinance is legally described as follows: That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 32, Township 118, Range 21, Hennepin County, Minnesota, except the north 33.00 feet and the west 33.00 feet thereof, lying northwesterly of the fallowing described line: Commencing at the northwest corner of said Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence South 89 degrees 00 minutes 09 seconds East, along the north line of said Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, a distance of 354.72 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence South 27 degrees 54 minutes 00 seconds West a distance of 434.62 feet; thence South 00 degrees 08 minutes 23 seconds East a distance of 36.78 feet; thence South 10 degrees 46 minutes 26 seconds West a distance of 79.86 feet; thence South 37 degrees 50 minutes 25 seconds West a distance of 71.89 feet; thence South 62 degrees 50 minutes 15 seconds West a distance of 100.69 feet, more or less, to the west line of said Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter and there terminating. Section 3. City Code Chapter 1 entitled “General Provisions” and Sec. 1-8 entitled “General Penalty; Continuing Violations” are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 4. This ordinance shall take effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law. Adopted by the City Council this 7th day of December, 2021. /s/Shepard M. Harris Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: /s/Theresa Schyma Theresa Schyma, City Clerk Golden Valley City Council Meeting December 7, 2021 Agenda Item 4. C. 1. Continuation of Public Hearing – Future Land Use Map Amendment for 6300 Olson Memorial Highway, Resolution No. 21-98 Prepared By Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager Summary United Properties is proposing three planning actions to allow for the redevelopment of 6300 Olson Memorial Highway. They are requesting a change to the Future Land Use Map (from Office use to Light Industrial use), a change to the Zoning Map (from the Office Zoning District to the Light Industrial Zoning District), and a subdivision of the property to create two new lots (one north, one south). These changes would require that the existing building be demolished and would allow for the construction of two new office/warehouse buildings as part of a new business center. At its meeting on October 25, the Planning Commission voted (3-2) to recommend approval of the land use change. This item was tabled at the November 16 City Council meeting. Background 6300 Olson Memorial Highway is more familiarly known as the Optum site (due to its most recent ownership by United Health) and before that the Pako site (the Pako Corporation was the first business to locate there in 1960). The 28-acre property contains a roughly 340,000 square foot office building constructed in 1958 and that has been sitting vacant since 2016. A more complete history of the site, the existing conditions, and the conversations with the applicant that led to the current proposal can be found in the attached staff memo to the Planning Commission. In order to accommodate the proposed R&D, light manufacturing, and warehouse uses, the guided land use and the zoning for the site would need to be changed to Light Industrial. The current Office designations are focused primarily on professional offices, medical and dental clinics, and financial institutions. Proposal The proposal for the site is to change the guided land use, change the zoning, and then proceed with a subdivision that would split the lot into two new lots (one north, one south). The large existing structure would be demolished and the parking area would be removed to make way for two new buildings. The wooded area in the northeast corner of the site, including the wetlands, would be reoriented and City Council Regular Meeting Executive Summary City of Golden Valley December 7, 2021 2 regraded to manage stormwater. The City will require land be dedicated through the middle of the site to accommodate a future public right-of-way to connect Douglas Drive and Country Club Drive. Consistent with the vision of the Douglas Drive Corridor Study, the proposed buildings would be pulled closer to Douglas Drive than the existing building, helping to create a more urban character along the recently reconstructed County road. The City’s architectural and material standards would be applied to the two new buildings. Draft Civil Site Development plans have been provided by the applicant and are attached, but staff emphasizes that the approvals that are being requested are related to the land use, the zoning, and the subdivision of the property, and that the City Council is not being asked to review or comment on the proposed site or landscaping plans. Required Process Support from the City Council for this proposal would also necessitate review and approval from the Metropolitan Council for the change in land use, requiring a delay in the final vote on the rezoning and the subdivision until the land use change was approved. Staff Review The City Code does not set specific standards for changing a future land use designation, and the City Council – with the input of the Planning Commission – has a great deal of latitude in deciding if the request is consistent with the overall direction and vision of the Comprehensive Plan. In making a determination, the City should take into account the land use descriptions outlined in the Comp Plan as well as any potential impacts on the character of the area. For reference, it is important to understand what both the existing and proposed land uses entail and the expectations placed on those land uses in the Comprehensive Plan. The 2040 Comp Plan has the following description of the Light Industrial land use: This category includes industrial uses less impactful than general industrial uses, such as packaging and processing, light assembly and manufacturing, offices and showrooms, and warehousing. This land use is located near industrial, commercial, and office uses and generates employment in the community. The Office land use is described as follows: This category includes offices for administrative, professional, and clerical services. This also includes medical or laboratory facilities where work is performed in a predominantly office setting. This land use is located near commercial, institutional, and high-density residential areas and generates employment in the community. As mentioned in the staff memo to the Planning Commission, the office market in the Twin Cities has softened considerably and the near-term prospects for recovery are uncertain given the flexibility offered by remote working that expanded greatly as a result of COVID-19. In contrast, there has been an increase in the demand for the flexibility provided in business center developments such as the one being proposed in locations that are close and convenient to Minneapolis and St. Paul. Having recently City Council Regular Meeting Executive Summary City of Golden Valley December 7, 2021 3 completed other, similar, projects, United Properties believes this location would be highly valued by prospective tenants. Given the “Employment Mixed Use” land use designation of the area directly across Douglas Drive to the east – which allows similar types of R&D and light manufacturing uses as well as commercial, office, and institutional uses – the proposed Light Industrial land use would not be out of character for the southern portion of Douglas Drive. Traffic One of the few technical aspects to the proposed land use change is the review of traffic and the number and manner of trips generated by a light industrial use as compared to an office use. An office use, such as the former business at this location, will tend to concentrate trips by employees during peak a.m. and p.m. periods, resulting in a higher level of congestion during morning and evening rush hours. Light industrial uses, such as manufacturing, R&D, and warehousing, have fewer employees per square foot in general. In addition, other trips associated with shipping and/or deliveries occur throughout the day (and evening) and are less likely to be concentrated during peak travel periods. When Douglas Drive was designed for reconstruction by Hennepin County, it was planned to accommodate the large number of employees working for Optum at that time. Therefore, staff has no concerns related to traffic flow or congestion on Douglas Drive or Olson Memorial Highway should this land use change be approved. Comprehensive Plan Consistency Finally, staff reviewed the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan to help determine if this proposed change in land use was following the intent of the City’s central guiding document. Based on the application materials, staff found the following goals and policies to support the reguiding and re-use of the site as a business center. Land Use • Goal 1: Create a Complete Community – Strive for a diverse and balanced community that contains a variety of residential areas, major employers, retail, service, institutions, and parks and open spaces. Objective 1.4 – Enhance employment centers. • Goal 3: Promote High Quality Development – Ensure new development meets high construction and visual quality standards and includes measures of sustainability. Objective 2 – Promote visual quality standards in design and material selection for new development. Objective 2.2 – Encourage visually attractive development in high-profile locations and long the city’s major corridors. • Goal 4: Prepare for Target Redevelopment – Use public and private redevelopment opportunities to advance the City’s Future Land Use Map and policies. Objective 1 – Redevelop parcels that are blighted, functionally obsolete, economically unsustainable, or incompatible with adjacent uses. City Council Regular Meeting Executive Summary City of Golden Valley December 7, 2021 4 Economic Competitiveness • Goal 3: Retain and Expand Existing Job Base – Work to accommodate the needs of existing businesses across industries and to support grown and expansion that is compatible with surrounding neighborhoods. Objective 2 – Preserve the city’s commercial/industrial base. • Goal 4: Strengthen Link Between Land Use and Economy – Examine how the city’s land us plan impacts and can support the larger economic vision by zoning for a variety of types of uses. Encourage high-quality redevelopment within targeted districts. Objective 2 – Encourage reinvestment and contemporary uses in existing properties. Objective 3 – Ensure redevelopment and reinvestment meet contemporary needs and standards, improve appearance, and result in increased value Discussion at Planning Commission The Planning Commission heard the future land use map amendment, zoning map amendment, and subdivision requests at its meeting on October 25. For both the land use and the zoning change, the Planning Commission voted 3-2 to recommend approval of the requests. Commissioners discussed if a more desirable use/zoning would be the City’s Employment Mixed Use designation – similar to the land on the east side of Douglas Drive. Staff and the applicant indicated that many of the site regulations associated with the Mixed Use zoning district would not be compatible with the proposed business center use and that the Light Industrial designation was viewed to be the most appropriate. Minutes from this meeting are attached to provide additional details on the discussion. Financial Or Budget Considerations None Recommended Action Motion to adopt Resolution No. 21-98, Amendment to the Future Land Use Map Designating the Property at 6300 Olson Memorial Highway as Light Industrial, and to authorize staff to forward the request to the Metropolitan Council for review. Supporting Documents • Memo to the Planning Commission dated October 25, 2021 (6 pages) • Planning Commission Minutes dated October 25, 2021 (3 pages) • Resolution No. 21-98, Amendment to the Future Land Use Map Designating the Property at 6300 Olson Memorial Highway as Light Industrial (1 page) • Future Land Use Map (1 page) • Project Narrative (7 pages) • Civil Site Development Plans (15 pages) • Tree Inventory Survey (1 page) • Landscape Plan (4 pages) 1 Date: October 25, 2021 To: Golden Valley Planning Commission From: Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager Subject: Informal Public Hearing – Future Land Use Map Amendment for 6300 Olson Memorial Highway Property address: 6300 Olson Memorial Highway Applicant: United Properties Property owner: Golden Valley Investors, LLC Zoning District: Office Lot size: 28 acres Current use: Vacant office building Future land use: Office Adjacent uses: Golf course (west), Railroad (north), Commercial/Industrial (east), Montessori preschool and State Highway right‐of‐way (south) 2020 aerial photo (Hennepin County) 2 Summary of Request United Properties is proposing three planning actions to allow for the redevelopment of 6300 Olson Memorial Highway. They are requesting a change to the Future Land Use Map (from Office use to Light Industrial use), a change to the Zoning Map (from the Office Zoning District to the Light Industrial Zoning District), and a subdivision of the property to create two new lots (one north, one south). These changes would require that the existing building be demolished and would allow for the construction of two new office/warehouse buildings as part of a new business center. Background 6300 Olson Memorial Highway is more familiarly known as the Optum site (due to its most recent ownership by United Health) and before that the Pako site (the Pako Corporation was the first business to locate there in 1960). The 28 acre property contains a roughly 340,000 square foot office building constructed in 1958 and that has been sitting vacant since 2016. In 1958, the site was rezoned from Open Development to Industrial – a designation that allows for office uses as well as manufacturing. The City’s 2030 Comprehensive Plan reguided the property from Industrial to Office use, though the zoning designation was not changed to come into alignment until after the 2040 Comprehensive Plan was adopted in 2020. As the plan was being drafted, the building was already vacant. With a strong local economy and real estate market, it was hoped that a new office user might purchase, renovate, and occupy the site. As part of the discussion around the proposed Future Land Use Map, some Planning Commissioners expressed interest in guiding the site for Mixed Use. However, the City Council was concerned that introducing a new opportunity for commercial and residential development along Olson Memorial Highway would compete with evolving plans for a more active downtown and the site remained guided for Office use in the Comp Plan. It was expected that the southern stretch of Douglas Drive would remain an employment generator, as described in the Douglas Drive Corridor Study, and as it had been for decades. Over the past four to five years, staff have been approached by a handful of developers looking at potential options for the site. At least two tech/medical companies explored using the existing structure in some fashion, one developer inquired about using the site as a location for a charter school, and others have asked about the possibility of rezoning the property and dividing it into a more traditional suburban commercial and residential development, with fast food restaurants, a convenience store, and multifamily apartments. Staff has also been in close contact with the local realtor, representing the seller, and has toured the existing structure. The large footprint with specialized interior spaces has made reuse of the primarily one‐story building challenging. United Properties, in close coordination with the property owner, contacted staff mid‐year to discuss a concept for a new business center at this location. Given the downturn in the office market – one that showed signs of softening even before the complications caused by COVID‐19 – and the increasing demand for flexible R&D, light manufacturing, and warehousing space in the inner ring suburbs, they felt a modern business center use would be successful. The existing structure is not compatible with this vision, but with a cleared site there would be sufficient room for two large buildings with high ceilings, flexible floor plans, and good site maneuverability for trucking. Given the large number of office employees that used to occupy this location, the new 3 design of Douglas Drive would easily be able to account for the expected daily trips generated by this new use. Staff familiarized the developer with the vision of the Douglas Drive study from the early 2000s and emphasized the need for high quality building elevations as the Olson Memorial Highway and Douglas Drive intersection is a prominent “gateway” into the center of Golden Valley. In order to accommodate the proposed R&D, light manufacturing, and warehouse uses, the guided land use and the zoning for the site would need to be changed to Light Industrial. The current Office designations are focused primarily on professional offices, medical and dental clinics, and financial institutions. Existing Conditions The site is approximately 28 acres. A 14 foot wide trail easement is located on a portion of the property that faces Douglas Drive and accommodates the Luce Line Regional Trail. A large portion of the site is covered with surface parking, while a wooded area with a wetland is located in the northeast corner adjacent to both Douglas Drive and the Union Pacific railroad tracks. Three stand‐ alone generators sit adjacent to the wooded area. Primary access to the site is via a signalized driveway on Douglas Drive. Driveways off of Country Club Drive, to the south, provides access to a small secondary parking lot. The driving range for the Golden Valley Country Club is immediately to the west. The existing structure has a footprint of over 295,000 square feet with additional second story space closest to Olson Memorial Highway resulting in a total building area of approximately 304,000 square feet. The building is primarily constructed of tip‐up concrete panels with brick cladding, and contains office space and a specialized data center constructed to meet the needs of the previous tenant. The front door faces east, but the structure sits back a large distance from Douglas Drive (over 300 feet). Over 1,300 parking spaces are striped throughout the large surface parking lots that surround the building. Landscaping within the parking lot is minimal. The majority of the site drains via the surface to the wetland to the northeast. Sanitary sewer service is handled by a 12 inch main under Douglas Drive. Potable water is provided via service from Country Club Drive; a separate fire line loops around the site and ties in to water mains under Country Club Drive and Douglas Drive. Proposal The proposal for the site is to change the guided land use, change the zoning, and then proceed with a subdivision that would split the lot into two new lots (one north, one south). The large existing structure would be demolished and the parking area would be removed to make way for two new buildings. The wooded area in the northeast corner of the site, including the wetlands, would be reoriented and regraded to manage stormwater. The City will require land be dedicated through the middle of the site to accommodate a future public right‐of‐way to connect Douglas Drive and Country Club Drive. 4 Consistent with the vision of the Douglas Drive Corridor Study, the proposed buildings would be pulled closer to Douglas Drive than the existing building, helping to create a more urban character along the recently reconstructed County road. The City’s architectural and material standards would be applied to the two new buildings. Draft Civil Site Development plans have been provided by the applicant and are attached, but staff emphasizes that the approvals that are being requested are related to the land use, the zoning, and the subdivision of the property, and that the Planning Commission and City Council are not being asked to review or comment on the proposed site or landscaping plans. Required Process Support from the Planning Commission and City Council for this proposal would also necessitate review and approval from the Metropolitan Council for the change in land use, requiring a delay in the final vote on the rezoning and the subdivision until the land use change was approved. Staff Review The City Code does not set specific standards for changing a future land use designation, and the City Council – with the input of the Planning Commission – has a great deal of latitude in deciding if the request is consistent with the overall direction and vision of the Comprehensive Plan. In making a determination, the City should take into account the land use descriptions outlined in the Comp Plan as well as any potential impacts on the character of the area. For reference, it is important to understand what both the existing and proposed land uses entail and the expectations placed on those land uses in the Comprehensive Plan. The 2040 Comp Plan has the following description of the Light Industrial land use: This category includes industrial uses less impactful than general industrial uses, such as packaging and processing, light assembly and manufacturing, offices and showrooms, and warehousing. This land use is located near industrial, commercial, and office uses and generates employment in the community. The Office land use is described as follows: This category includes offices for administrative, professional, and clerical services. This also includes medical or laboratory facilities where work is performed in a predominantly office setting. This land use is located near commercial, institutional, and high‐density residential areas and generates employment in the community. As mentioned above, the office market in the Twin Cities has softened considerably and the near‐ term prospects for recovery are uncertain given the flexibility offered by remote working that expanded greatly as a result of COVID‐19. In contrast, there has been an increase in the demand for the flexibility provided in business center developments such as the one being proposed in locations that are close and convenient to Minneapolis and St. Paul. Having recently completed other, similar, projects, United Properties believes this location would be highly valued by prospective tenants. 5 Given the “Employment Mixed Use” land use designation of the area directly across Douglas Drive to the east – which allows similar types of R&D and light manufacturing uses as well as commercial, office, and institutional uses – the proposed Light Industrial land use would not be out of character for the southern portion of Douglas Drive. Traffic One of the few technical aspects to the proposed land use change is the review of traffic and the number and manner of trips generated by a light industrial use as compared to an office use. An office use, such as the former business at this location, will tend to concentrate trips by employees during peak a.m. and p.m. periods, resulting in a higher level of congestion during morning and evening rush hours. Light industrial uses, such as manufacturing, R&D, and warehousing, have fewer employees per square foot in general. In addition, other trips associated with shipping and/or deliveries occur throughout the day (and evening) and are less likely to be concentrated during peak travel periods. When Douglas Drive was designed for reconstruction by Hennepin County, it was planned to accommodate the large number of employees working for Optum at that time. Therefore, staff has no concerns related to traffic flow or congestion on Douglas Drive or Olson Memorial Highway should this land use change be approved. Comprehensive Plan Consistency Finally, staff reviewed the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan to help determine if this proposed change in land use was following the intent of the City’s central guiding document. Based on the application materials, staff found the following goals and policies to support the reguiding and re‐use of the site as a business center. Land Use  Goal 1: Create a Complete Community – Strive for a diverse and balanced community that contains a variety of residential areas, major employers, retail, service, institutions, and parks and open spaces. Objective 1.4 – Enhance employment centers.  Goal 3: Promote High Quality Development – Ensure new development meets high construction and visual quality standards and includes measures of sustainability. Objective 2 – Promote visual quality standards in design and material selection for new development. Objective 2.2 – Encourage visually attractive development in high‐profile locations and long the city’s major corridors.  Goal 4: Prepare for Target Redevelopment – Use public and private redevelopment opportunities to advance the City’s Future Land Use Map and policies. Objective 1 – Redevelop parcels that are blighted, functionally obsolete, economically unsustainable, or incompatible with adjacent uses. 6 Economic Competitiveness  Goal 3: Retain and Expand Existing Job Base – Work to accommodate the needs of existing businesses across industries and to support grown and expansion that is compatible with surrounding neighborhoods. Objective 2 – Preserve the City’s commercial/industrial base.  Goal 4: Strengthen Link Between Land Use and Economy – Examine how the City’s land us plan impacts and can support the larger economic vision by zoning for a variety of types of uses. Encourage high‐quality redevelopment within targeted districts. Objective 2 – Encourage reinvestment and contemporary uses in existing properties. Objective 3 – Ensure redevelopment and reinvestment meet contemporary needs and standards, improve appearance, and result in increased value Recommended Action Based on the findings above, staff recommends approval of the requested amendment to the Future Land Use Map, changing the guided land use for 6300 Olson Memorial Highway from Office to Light Industrial. Attachments: Future Land Use Map (1 page) Project Narrative (7 pages) Civil Site Development Plans (15 pages) Tree Inventory Survey (1 page) Landscape Plan (4 pages) City of Golden Valley Planning Commission Regular Meeting October 25, 2021, 2021 – 7 pm 4 5. Informal Public Hearings – Future Land Use Map Amendment, Zoning Map Amendment, Consideration of Preliminary Plat Address: 6300 Olson Memorial Highway Applicant: United Properties Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager, articulated that there was one hearing but three separate items requiring three votes from Commissioners. Zimmerman described the lot and displayed a map and the zoning map while giving a background on the site, which has been vacant since 2016. The 2030 Comp Plan re‐guided the site for Office but zoning was not modified until 2020. The site is 28 acres with a 340,000 sq ft office building, wetland/wooded area in the NE corner, and over 1,300 parking spaces. United Properties would like to redevelop the site for a new Golden Valley business center. The two existing buildings would be demoed and two new buildings would be constructed. The land use would need to change from Office to Light Industrial, zoning would need to change, and stormwater would need to be addressed along the north property line. Staff displayed images from a few other examples of sites United has developed and a rendering of the potential building for this site. 1. The fist consideration is the Future Land Use Amendment and there are no specific standards within the City Code to evaluate. Zimmerman described the land use descriptions, impacts to the character of the area, and comprehensive plan consistency. 2. The second consideration is the zoning map amendment, and as before, there are no specific standards within the city code to evaluate. Zimmerman described the purposes of zoning districts, listed the permitted/conditional uses for current and proposed zoning, and compatibility with surrounding uses. Zimmerman went on to discuss the subdivision and transportation improvements. Recommendations Future Land Use Amendment:  Staff recommends approval of the requested amendment to the Future Land Use Map, changing the guided land use from Office to Light Industrial Zoning Map Amendment:  Based on the findings above, staff recommends approval of the requested amendment to the Zoning Map, changing the zoning designation from Office to Light Industrial Subdivision:  Based on the factors of evaluation, staff recommends approval of the proposed preliminary plat for the Golden Valley Business Center, subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall work with staff to dedicate land through the site sufficient to provide right‐of‐way for a future public road. 2. The applicant shall include on the final plat the dedication of all drainage and utility easements deemed necessary to meet City Code requirements (including floodplain and wetland areas). City of Golden Valley Planning Commission Regular Meeting October 25, 2021, 2021 – 7 pm 5 3. Any comments from the Minnesota Department of Transportation or Hennepin County shall be incorporated into the final plat. 4. A park dedication fee of $519,180 (or 6% of the land value) shall be paid prior to the release of the final plat. 5. The City Attorney will determine if a title review is necessary prior to approval of the final plat. Commissioner Ginis asked staff if there had been conversations with the applicant about curb appeal and access; and staff affirmed. In addition, the location is a main intersection and thus gateway to the City, conversations have occurred with the architects to ensure attention to façade is prioritized. Commissioners and staff discussed the wetlands on the site, the road around the site, traffic, zoning designation options, and the road right‐of‐way that the applicant and Country club don’t want. Chair Pockl invited the applicant to present. Connor McCarthy, United Properties Developer ‐ Applicant, gave a brief presentation on the site, its location, and background. The applicant discussed office uncertainty, the current zoning of this site, and prediction of use based on a rezoning to light industrial. Commissioner Ginis asked the applicant how they’re thinking about alternative transportation for their site plan. The applicant stated they are looking to offer bike parking and sidewalks to create safe access for alternative modes. The site plan is just entering the phase where the details of those items are being developed. Commissioner Ruby asked the applicant to expand on plans for the wetlands. Tom Lincoln, Civil Engineer ‐ Kimley Horn, said they conducted a wetland delineation with Golden Valley staff. There is a technical evaluation panel and the group is in the process of creating a mitigation plan. The area was a wetland, became a stormwater collection area in the 1960’s, then evolved into a larger wetland. It’s currently considered a regulated wetland under the Wetland Conservation Act. Mitigation was considered onsite but neither the soil nor space would allow for stormwater management. The proposal is to mitigate offsite but develop a filtration system to replicate the native possibilities of the existing wetland. Chair Pockl opened the public hearing at 9:03pm. There were no residents present for comment nor were there callers. Chair Pockl closed the public hearing at 9:06pm Chair Pockl opened the discussion on the requested amendment to the Future Land Use Map. Commissioner Brookins stated that he thinks Mixed Use – Employment would be better suited. Commissioner Johnson seconded this statement. Staff discussed this option as a lot of intended trucking and delivery uses may not fit in that use. Commissioners continued this conversation on making the site marketable for the present and future and discussed with staff the difference in zonings. Commissioners discussed this zoning with the applicant and the applicant has a strict purchase agreement with the seller and due to that they may not have an extended timeline to discuss this zoning possibility. Staff added the proposal presented also will not meet the requirements of Mixed Use – Employment. City of Golden Valley Planning Commission Regular Meeting October 25, 2021, 2021 – 7 pm 6 MOTION made by Chair Pockl, seconded by Commissioner Ruby, to recommend approval of the requested amendment to the Future Land Use Map, changing the guided land use from Office to Light Industrial. Aye: Ginis, Pockl, Ruby Nay: Brookins, Johnson Motion Passes 3‐2 MOTION made by Commissioner Pockl, seconded by Commissioner Ruby, to recommend approval of the requested amendment to the Zoning Map, changing the zoning designation from Office to Light Industrial. Aye: Ginis, Pockl, Ruby Nay: Brookins, Johnson Motion Passes 3‐2 Commissioners discussed the right of way, roads, the luce trail, and the north/south connection. MOTION made by Commissioner Brookins, seconded by Commissioner Ruby, to recommend approval of the proposed preliminary plat for the Golden Valley Business Center, subject to the listed conditions. Motion passed unanimously. Chair Pockl closed the discussion, and ended the televised portion of the meeting at 9:41pm. 6.Council Liaison Report Council Member Rosenquist updated the Commissioners on Home Energy Audits/light bulb kits being offered via the Physical Development Department. She praised the Commission for its work and noted that October is Community Planning Month. Rosenquist also reported on recent actions by the City Council, including an update form the Historical Society, a report by Hennepin County Sheriff Hutchinson, approval of a curbside organics program, and the receipt of the Downtown Study. 7.Other Business None. 8.Adjournment MOTION by Commissioner Ginis to adjourn, seconded by Commissioner Ruby, and approved unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 9:50 pm. ________________________________ Andy Johnson, Secretary ________________________________ Amie Kolesar, Planning Assistant RESOLUTION NO. 21-98 RESOLUTION FOR AMENDMENT TO THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP DESIGNATING THE PROPERTY AT 6300 OLSON MEMORIAL HIGHWAY AS LIGHT INDUSTRIAL WHEREAS, the City Council has met at the time and place specified in a notice duly published with respect to the subject matter hereof and has heard all interested persons, and it appearing in the interest of the public that the Future Land Use Map as heretofore adopted and enacted by the City of Golden Valley be amended; and WHEREAS, the area affected is legally described as follows: Lot 1, Auditor's Subdivision No. 322, Hennepin County, Minnesota; and All that part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 32, Township 118, Range 21, lying South of the right of way of the Electric Short Line Railroad Company and East of the West 653 feet thereof; and The East 323 feet of the West 653 feet of that part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter lying South of the right of way of the Minnesota Western Railway Company; The East 323 feet of the West 653 feet of that part of the Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter lying North of the center line of 6th Avenue North; all in Section 32, Township 118, Range 21. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council for the City of Golden Valley, that pursuant to the provision of Sec. 113-28 of the City Code for the City of Golden Valley, and subject to review and approval by the Metropolitan Council for conformity with regional systems plan as provided in state law, the Future Land Use Map for the City of Golden Valley is hereby amended by designating the property at 6300 Olson Memorial Highway as Light Industrial. Adopted by the City Council this 7th day of December, 2021. _____________________________ Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: _____________________________ Theresa Schyma, City Clerk ! ! ! !!! ! !!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!! ! !!! ! !!!!! ! ! ! !!! ! !!!!!!!! !!!!!!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!!!!!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! !!! !!!!!!!!!!!!! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!! ! !! !!! ! !!! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!! !!!! !!!! !!!!!!!!! !!!! ! ! !!!!!M edi c i neLakeBranchIk ePond Colonial Pond Ottaw a Pond Glen-w oodPond Egre tPond LilacPond DuluthPond St.CroixPond Chicago Pond LilacPond Pond CT urne rs Pond Glen 1 Pond DuckPond Loop EPond Loop FPond Sw e e ne y Lak e Wirth Lak eT w in Lak e B a s s ett C re e k Ham pshire Pond De colaPond A NorthRicePond We st RingPond Cortlaw n Pond De colaPond s B & C We stw ood Lak e Schape rPond SouthRicePond East RingPond Basse tt Cre e k De colaPondE De colaPond F Bre ckPond Natche zPond MinnaquaPond WirthPond T ole d o/Ange loPond Hone yw e llPond Straw be rryPond De colaPond D Ba s s e t t C re e k BassettC r e e k Basse t t C re e kBassettC r e e k BassettC reekSweeney L akeBranchSw e e ne y Lak e BranchNW LoopPondBoone Ave nue Pond Main Ste m Pond B Pond C Basse tt Cre e k NatureArea Pond Me d icine Lak e Brook vie wPond A Hid d e n Lak e sPond 1 Pond 2A Pond 2B Pond 3 Schape r Ballfie ldPond Pond O Pond J Spirit of Hope Church Pond Gold e nRid gePond Gold e n Me ad ow s Pond Socce rFie ldPond We stPond 201Ge ne ralMillsPond HaroldPond Me d icine Lak e Road Pond Xe nia MitigationPond 10th Ave Pond SpringPond Briar-w oodPond Laure lHills Pond JFB NWPond LogisPond Brow nieLak e BirchPond MinnaquaWe tland Grim e sPondBasse tt Cre e kPark Pond SweeneyLakeBranchPond M Pond F Pond D Po n d E Dove r HillPondLibe rty Basin Brook vie wGolf Course LionsPark We sle yPark So c h a c k i P a r k Schape rPark Sche idParkHam pshirePark Me d le yPark Briarw ood Laure l A v e n u e G r e e n b e l t Gle nvie w T e rracePark North T yrolPark We ste rn Ave nueMarsh Nature Are a Ge artyPark Sand burg Athle ticFacility Natche zPark Valle yVie w ParkPe nnsylvaniaWood s Basse ttCre e kNature Are a Wild w oodPark IsaacsonPark SouthT yrol Park Se e m anPark Ad e lineNature Are a Yose m itePark Stock m anPark Gold e n Oak sPark St CroixPark Lak e vie wPark Sw e e ne yPark Pe rpich Ce nte rBall Fie ld s Ronald B. Davis Com m unity Ce nte r Brook vie w Park We stw ood HillsNature Ce nte r (SLP) (MPRB) T he od ore WirthRe gional Park Eloise Butle r Wild flow e rGard e n and Bird Sanctuary Wirth Lak eBe ach Gold e n Rid geNature Are a Ge ne ral Mills Nature Pre se rve Ge ne ral Mills Re se archNature Are a BooneOpe nSpace Gold e nHills Pond Mad isonPond SouthT yrolPond LibraryHill Id ahoWe tland Ge orgiaOpe n Space Ardm oreNorth&SouthPond s JanalynPond Me ad owPond Ope n S p a c e Ork laOpe nSpace PicnicPavilion Chale t Sochack iPark (T h r e e R i v e r s P a r k D i s t . ) Basse tt Valle y Open Space ByrdBluffOpenSpace → FishingDock Paisle yPark Xe niaOpe nSpace Dahlbe rgOpe nSpace Mi n n a q u a G r e e n b e l t (T RPD) (Mpls Park & Re c Board ) Plym o u t h A v e n u e T he T railhe ad 456766 456770 456766 456740 456740 4567156 4567102 §¨¦394 §¨¦394 Æÿ55 Æÿ55 Æÿ100 Æÿ100 £¤169 £¤169 34th Ave N Medicine Lake Rd BroggerCir Knoll St Lilac Dr NLilac Dr NThotland Rd Mendelssohn Ave NWinnetka Ave NSunny r i d g e Cir Western Ave (WaterfordDr)Hillsboro Ave NZealandAve N Aquila Ave NOrkla DrWisconsin Ave N23rd Ave N KalternLn Wynnwood Rd 25th Ave N Bies DrJonellen Ln Sumter Ave NRhodeIslandAveNPatsy Ln Valders Ave NWinnetka Ave NDuluth St Florida Ave NSandburg Rd HeritageCirKentley Ave Wynnwood Rd Kenneth Way Unity Ave NB a s s e ttC r e e k D rQuailAveNScott Ave NLilac Dr NLowry Ter 33rd Ave N Noble Ave NCross LnQuail Ave NScott Ave NRegent Ave NToledo Ave NIndiana Ave N(BridgewaterRd)(WaterfordCt)(Hid d e nLnkesPkwy)Meadow Ln NFrance Ave NTopel Rd Unity Ave NPhoenix St Parkview TerWelcomeAveNWelcomeC ir W e l c o meAveNXeniaAveNZ a n e A v e N Lindsay St St C r o i x A v e N St Croix Ave N Yosemite Ave NWolfberryLnBrunswick Ave NCounty Rd 102Westmore Way Green Valley Rd Louisiana Ave NKelly DrMaryland Ave NOlympia St Winsdale St Winnetka Ave NYukon CtWesleyDr Wesley Dr Plymouth Ave N 10th Ave N Kelly DrVarner CirPennsylvania Ave NFaribault StQuebec Ave NRhode Island Ave NPhoenix St Knoll St County Rd 156Jersey Ave NCountryClubDr Phoenix St Douglas DrGeorgia Ave NCou n ty R d40 Hampshire Ave NWestch esterCirJersey Ave NGardenParkQuebe c Av e SWinnetka Ave NWally St Ensign Ave N7th Ave N Golden Valle y Rd Decatur Ave N10 t h A v e N Natchez Ave NXerxes Ave N (Mpls)Olson Memorial Hwy Cu t a c r o s s R d Olson Memorial Hwy Earl St Flag Ave NHampshire LnJersey Ave NFloridaAveNEdgewoodAve NDouglas DrDuluth Ln Scott Ave N Drake Rd Lowry Ter Kyle Ave NQuail Ave NPerry Ave NNoble Ave NCulver Rd Dawnview Ter Dona Ln Noble Ave NScottAveNGl e ndenTer Culver R d Marie Ln W Hampton Rd RegentAveNPerryAveNLilac Dr N27th Ave N Merribee Dr Kyle Ave NHampton RdOrchard Ave NMarie Ln E Lee Ave NKyle Ave NDresde n L n Ke w a n e e W a y 26th Ave N Me r i d i a n D r P a r k v i e w B l v d Terrace LnManor DrMc N a i r D r By r d A v e N B a s s ettCreekDrMaryHillsDrZenith Ave NVista DrXerxes Ave NYork Ave NSt Margaret Dr Zephyr PlXerxes Ave NXerxes Ave N (Mpls)(SkylineDr)Spruce TrKyle PlWestbrook Rd Noble Ave Frontage RdCircleDownOrchard Ave NPerryAveNWindsorWayWestbend R dUnity Ave NGreenvie w LnRegent Ave NSorell Ave Frontenac Ave Quail Ave NSt Croix Ave N Winsdale St StCroixCirAngelo DrUnity Ave NAlfred Rd Spring Valley RdN o b l e DrMajor DrAdeline LnAngelo DrAngelo DrWills PlToledo Ave NOttawa Ave NKillarney DrZane Ave NWoodstoc k A v e Woodstock Ave Loring LnYosemiteAveN Turners Crossroad NWestchesterCirN F r ontageRdFlorida Ave NHampshire Ave NPlymouth Ave N Idaho Ave NOlympia StHampshire Ave NArcher Ave NKelly DrPennsylvania Ave NDuluth St Xylon Ave NWisconsin Ave NSumter Ave NBoone Ave NWinsdale St Meadow Ln N DahlbergD r Woodstock Ave Poplar Dr Meadow Ln NChatelain T e r Natchez Ave NEdgewood Ave NKingston Cir Glenwood A v e Country Club DrValdersAveNOrkla DrElgin PlDecaturAveN Indiana Ave NRoanoke CirWestern Ave Western Ave Harold Ave Loring Ln WestwoodDrNArdmoreDrWinsdale St Knoll St Oak Grove CirDuluth St Zane Ave NDouglas Dr27th Ave N Bonni e Ln Medicine Lake Rd Madison Ave W Nevada Ave NLouisiana Ave NCounty Rd 70 ValdersAve NValders Ave N23rd Ave N Rhode IslandAve NCounty Rd 156Medicine Lake Rd Mendelssohn Ave NWinsdale St St Croix Ave N June Ave NLegend DrLegendLn General Mills BlvdBoone Ave NSunnyridge LnGlenwood Ave Janalyn CirJanalyn CirGlencrest Rd Meadow Ln SWayzata BlvdWestwood Dr SWestwoodLn StrawberryLnOttawa Ave NOttawa Ave SNatchez Ave S Tyrol Crest SussexRdJune Ave SWayzata Blvd FairlawnWayNatchez Ave SOttawa Ave SPrincetonAve SDouglas Ave Circle DownTurners Crossroad SGolden Hills Dr Laurel AveLaurel Ave Hampshire Ave SDakota Ave SBrunswick Ave SKing Hill RdGlenwood Ave Colonial Dr Medicine Lake Rd FloridaAveSAlley Market StMarket St Louisiana Ave SLaurel AvePennsylvania Ave SRhode Island Ave SSumter Ave SUtah Ave SGregory Rd VermontAve SWi sc o ns i n Ave SGeneral Mills BlvdHanley RdRidgeway Rd Laurel Ave QubecAve S County Rd 102Nevada Ave SColonial RdLouisianaAveSKentucky Ave SJersey Ave SHeathbrookeCir Glenwood P k w y (Carriage Path)Xenia Ave SFlorida CtLilacD r NOlson Memorial Hwy Schaper Rd Lilac Dr NGolden Valley Rd Lilac Dr N(WoodlandTrail)(Wat.Dr) BassettCreek Ln (NobleDr)France Ave S (Mpls)N Frontage Rd S Frontage Rd Olson Mem HwyAdair Ave NAdair Ave NWestbrookRd 34th Ave N Mendelssohn Ave NAlley-Unimproved--Uni m p r o v e d - Wayzata Blvd Wayz a t a B l v dBoone Ave NGolden Valley Dr SchullerCirN Frontage Rd S Frontage Rd Rhode IslandAve N Pennsylvania Ave SAlley Alley (Private)AlleyAlleyLilac Dr NXerxes Ave N (Mpls)Harold Ave WestwoodDr N Ardmore DrT h e o d o r e Wirt h P k w y Tyrol Tr(Mendelssohn Ln)AlleyS Frontage Rd AlpinePassBren n e r PassDou g la s Ave QuentinAveSTyrol TrailTyro l Tr a ilSunset Ridge Westw oodDrS RavineTrTyrol Trai l J analyn C irMadd usLn MeadowLnS AvondaleRdBurntsideDr S u nnyridgeLnBru n swickAveNLeberLn C loverleafDrCloverLnCloverleaf D r TheodoreWirthPkwyBeverly Ave B u rn tsideDrSpringValleyRdT oledoAveN Duluth St GoldenValle y R dSpringValleyCirC oun ty Rd 66 (Island Dr)(IslandDr)GoldenValley Rd TheodoreWirthPkwyWirth Pkwy W ay z a t aBlvd G le n w o o d P kwyPlymouthAve N (Mpls )ZenithAveNCrest vi ewA ve By r d A v e N Hwy 55 Glenwood Ave Bassett CreekDrLegend DrLeeAveNLeeAveNMajorAveNLeeAveNE l m daleRd Adell A veM in n a q ua Dr M innaquaD r ToledoAveNOrdwayM arkayRidge Orchard Ave NN o r m a n d y P l CherokeePlQuailAveNRegentAveNTr ito n DrT r ito n D rL o w r y Ter 3 3rd AveN SandburgLn LamplighterL n BrookridgeAveNValeCrestRdWinfieldAveCounty Rd 66 P ark Place Blv d (SLP)I-394SFr o n tage R d (SLP )Xeni aAveSCounty Rd 70 L ilacD rNLilacDrNLilacD r NConstanceDrWConstanceDrESandburg Rd S Frontage Rd N Frontage Rd N Frontage RdOlsonMemorialHwy S Frontage Rd O l s o n M e m o r ia lH w y OlsonMemorialHwy Valleywo odCirYosemite CirLawn TerRadisson Rd Turnpike RdA l l e y AlleyTu r npikeR d Col on ial Dr GlenwoodAve BrunswickAve NMeanderRd MeanderRdIdahoAveNHaroldAve Wayzata Blvd I-394SFrontageRd Edgewo odAveSIdahoAveNCortlawnCirWCortlawn Cir S CortlawnCirN Dawnv i e wTerCounty Rd 70 EdgewoodAveSK in g CreekRdKentu cky AveNLouisianaAveNMarylandAve SRhodeIslandAveSRidgewayRdEwald T e rWestern Ter FieldD r Brookview Pk w y N Harold Ave HalfMoonDr RidgewayRdG oldenValleyR d(B a s sett Creek Blvd)Lewis Rd 10th Ave N EllisLnPlym outhAveN Plymouth Ave N Faribault St OrklaDrCastleCt Winnetka Heights D rKelly Dr Maryland A v eNHampsh i r e P l Olympia St Oregon Ave NQuebecAveNValdersAveNOrklaDrKnoll S tWisconsin AveNWinsdaleSt Mandan AveNCounty Rd 102AquilaAveNAquila AveNZealandAveNJulianne Ter J u lia nneTerPatsy Ln WisconsinAveNAquilaAveNWestbend Rd WinnetkaHeightsDr ZealandAveNOrklaDrValdersCtValdersAve NWinnetkaHeights Dr A q uilaAveNZealandAveNS cottAveNRose ManorDuluthSt Duluth St CavellAveNEnsignAveNEl g in Pl 23 rd Ave N Medle y L n (Medley Rd) (Medley C ir)H illsboroAveN(English Cir )(MayfairR d)(Kin g sV a l l e y Rd)(K ings V al leyRdE)(KingsValle yRd W ) ( S t r o d e n C i r )(Tama rin Tr ) (Mar qui sRd) Sk i H i l l R d MajorCirLeeAveNMajorAveNRhodeIslandAveNG o ld en V alleyR d G o ld e n V a lle y R dG olden V alleyR d Hwy100H w y 10 0Hwy100Hwy100Hwy100Hwy100 H w y 3 9 4 Hwy 394 Hwy 394 Hwy 394 Hwy 394ColoradoAve NHwy169Hwy169Hwy169Hwy169Hwy169Colorado Ave SGoldenHills DrPaisleyLnPaisleyLn I-394NFrontageRd I -3 9 4 N Frontage Rd WayzataBlvd I-394SFrontag e R d York AveNValeryRdW asatchLn Hwy 55 Hwy 55 Hwy 55 Olson Memorial HwyHwy 55 Hwy 55 County Rd 40 County Rd 40 Glenwood A v e CountyR d 4 0 CountyRd40 GoldenValley R d C o u nty Rd 66ManchesterDr County Rd 156OregonAveS24th Ave N LilacDrNRoanokeRdLouisianaAveN Turnpike RdLilacLoop (Sunnyridge Ln)WisconsinAveN GettysburgCt(Laurel Pt) (Laure lCurv)Independence Ave NGettysburg Ave NFlag Ave NWheelerBlvdAlleyNaper St B e tty CrockerDr Decatur Ave N(WesleyCommonsDr)Winnetka Ave S Winnetka Ave SHanley RdBrookviewPkwySWayzataBlvd I-394 S Front a g e R d Olympia St Independence Ave NHillsboro Ave NGettysburg Ave NU n io n P acific Railroad Canadian Pacific Railroad B u rlin g to n N o rt h e r n Sant aFeRailroadCanadianPacificRailroadC anadianP acificR ailroadC anadia n P a c i f i c R ailroad U nion Pacific R a i l r o a d Breck School Sa nd burgMid d le School Pe rpich Ce nte r for Arts Ed uca tion MN DOT District Office & Sta te Hig hway Pa trol N obleEle m enta rySchool Ca lva ryLuthe ranChurch Spe a k theW ord Church 10th Ave nueCold Stora g e School ofEng inee ringand Arts Gove rnm e ntCe nte r &Fire Sta tion #1 Me a d owbrookEle m enta rySchool King of Gra ceLuthe ranChurchand School Churchof St.Ma rg are tMa ry Good She phe rdCa tholic Church &Good She phe rdSchool Gold e nVa lle yLuthe ranChurch Spirit ofHopeChurch Oa k Grove Church He nne pinCounty She riffCom m unica tions He nne pin CountyLibra ry Fire Sta tion#3 Va lle y Com m unity Presbyte ria n Church Christia nLifeCe nte r UnityChristChurch Re d e e m e rRe form e dChurch FireSta tion#2 Va lle y of Pe a ceLuthe ran Church Gold e n Va lle yCe m e te ry Gold e n Va lle yHistorica lSocie ty Brookvie wCom m unityCe nte r Breck IceArena W a te rRe se rvoir U.S.Post Office Love works Aca d e m y forVisua l & Pe rform ing Arts CITY OF NEW HOPE CITY OF CRYSTAL CITY OF ROBBINSDALE CITY OF MINNEAPOLISCITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK CITY OF MINNEAPOLISCITY OFST. LOUIS PARKCITY OF ROBBINSDALECITY OF CRYSTAL CITY OF CRYSTALCITY OF NEW HOPE CITY OF PLYMOUTHCITY OF MINNEAPOLISCITY OFST. LOUIS PARKCITY OFPLYMOUTHCity of Gold e n Va lle y, Eng ine e ring7800 Gold e n Va lle y R oa dGold e n Va lle y, MN 55427-4588763-593-8030www.g old e nva lle ym n.g ov 2020-2040Future Land Use 0 800 1,600 2,400 3,200400 Fe e t I Print Date : 8/5/2020Source s:-He nne pin County Surve yors Office for Prope rty Line s (2020) -City of Gold e n Valle y for all othe r laye rs. Future Land Use Residential Low De nsity – up to 5 units pe r a cre Mod e ra te De nsity – 5 to 8 units pe r a cre Me d ium De nsity – 8 to 30 units pe r a cre Hig h De nsity – 20 to 100 units pe r a cre Commercial Office Re ta il/Se rvice Industrial Lig ht Ind ustria l Ind ustria l Mixed Use N e ig hborhood Com m unity Institutional Asse m bly Civic Me d ica l Open Space Pa rks a nd N a tura l Are a s W a te r Fe a ture Right-of-Way Ra ilroa d Rig ht-of-W a y (public a nd priva te ) ZONING MAP AMENDMENT APPLICATION FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT APPLICATION SUBDIVISION APPLICATION SUBMITTAL NARRATIVE Golden Valley Business Center Golden Valley, Minnesota September 24, 2021 United Properties, in partnership with the current property owner UBS, seeks to develop two buildings totaling approximately 399,000 SF. Per the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, the subject site is currently listed as vacant/undeveloped and consists of a vacant 340,000 square foot office building. The site is on the northwest corner of Highway 55 and Douglas Drive North. The 340,000 SF office building that is currently located at 6300 Olson Memorial Highway was once occupied by UnitedHealth Group/Optum Health. United Properties plans to demolish the existing building, which was constructed in 1958 and has sat vacant since 2016. The building owner, UBS, anticipates partnering with United Properties to redevelop the site as they have concluded that the existing building’s characteristics make it not viable to lease to modern-day real estate users. United Properties is proposing a modernized business park which offers more long-term functionality and flexibility than the current building – with increased ceiling heights, efficient space demising for multiple employers, and flexible site maneuverability and parking area that allows for a range of businesses and employee profiles, etc. The COVID-19 pandemic caused serious uncertainty regarding the future of office space demand, and “work from home” strategies continue to threaten the outlook for space occupiers and real estate owners. Conversely over the last 18-months the demand for production, lab/R&D, and warehousing, of goods and services within the United States has grown exponentially to meet the demand of consumers. Shipping/transportation challenges and overseas manufacturing stoppages are leading companies to produce more product inside the United States to avoid future supply chain shocks and inefficiencies. These factors, combined with the desire of employers to locate facilities closer to urban centers, make the Golden Valley Business Center a unique offering in the Twin Cities metro. This site has potential to be one of the closest metro opportunities for employers seeking space offering flexibility for office, production, lab/R&D, and/or warehousing space. United Properties proposes demolishing the existing improvements and replacing the outdated facility with more modern building specifications—28-32’ clear buildings that are targeted to users with flexible space needs for both white- and blue-collar job offerings. United Properties has worked with several clients in recent years who serve as examples of employers who would occupy the future Golden Valley Business Center, and are listed as follows:  Cretex Medical – a surgical and medical instrument manufacturer and engineering services provider. United Properties is currently developing their new 240,000 SF medical device headquarters project in Brooklyn Park. Upon completion the office/manufacturing/warehouse building will house up to 400 employees.  Tesla – designer and manufacturer of electric cars, battery energy, solar panels, etc. United Properties developed a 70,400 SF headquarters for Perbix Machines in 2015, who was subsequently purchased by Tesla in 2018. The facility serves as Tesla’s primary robotics design and manufacturing business, with a mix of office, design, and engineering jobs housed in the high-tech manufacturing space.  Nilfisk Advance – Nilfisk is a global provider of commercial and industrial cleaning equipment. The 170,000 SF North American headquarters, developed by United Properties in 2015, contains over 300 jobs responsible for manufacturing and engineering premium cleaning products for consumers worldwide. In conversations with city staff, it was concluded that the Light Industrial Zoning District most closely aligns with the proposed development project goals for the site. The Light Industrial Zoning District allows for office, production, lab/R&D, and/or warehouse uses which do not constitute nuisance to surrounding districts. The site is currently within the Office Zoning District, which prohibits the flexible utilization of the uses listed above which, if rezoned would pave the way for the city to offer a mix of businesses and employment opportunities, with positive economic impacts—jobs, tax base, housing demand, and retail demand—that permeate beyond the borders of the site. United Properties believes that Golden Valley Business Center will be the highest quality, Class-A offering in the market for users like those represented above. For that reason, United Properties plans to design the new buildings to a higher standard than its competition, and to a higher standard than the Light Industrial Zoning District design guidelines require – using both precast concrete panels, enhanced with a mix of supplementary Class I materials – glass, metal paneling, and wood – that offer an inspiring front door and ample natural light for the hundreds of new employees that will occupy this site in the future. Please see enclosed project renderings that provide a perspective of our design vision intent. Given the approval process and timeline, United Properties is considering the proposed project for construction commencement in summer/fall of 2022. kimley-horn.com 767 Eustis Street, Suite 100, St. Paul, MN 55114 651-645-4197 Project Narrative Golden Valley Business Center September 24, 2021 Chapter 109 – Subdivisions The Preliminary Plat and Final Plat for GOLDEN VALLEY BUSINESS CENTER will adhere to the requirements of Chapter 109 – Subdivisions of the City of Golden Valley City Code. The subdivision of the property located at 6300 Olson Memorial Highway in Golden Valley, MN, PID No. 3211821140003, into two lots and right-of-way dedication. Lot 1, Block 1, GOLDEN VALLEY BUSINESS CENTER 586,299 SF Lot 2, Block 1, GOLDEN VALLEY BUSINESS CENTER 634,635 SF Dedicated Right-of-Way (Douglas Drive and County Club Drive 116,254 SF Inflow/Infiltration Compliance Inflow and Infiltration (I/I) is the excess flow of clear water into the City of Golden valley’s sanitary sewer system. Inflow is when clear water from illegal connections of sump pumps, downspouts, and foundation drains is channeled directly into sanitary sewer pipes. Infiltration is when groundwater seeps into sewer pipes via cracks or leaky joints. Because the sanitary sewer system was not designed to handle this excess clear water, it becomes overloaded during times of high groundwater or heavy rainfall. The excess clear water from I/I problems uses sanitary sewer capacity needed for wastewater. The Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES), which provides regional wastewater collection and treatment for the metropolitan area, requires communities with excess I/I to invest in local reduction remedies. To comply with MCES directives regarding I/I, the City inspects homes and businesses in Golden Valley to determine if roof drains, foundation drains, sump pumps, and other clear water sources are connected to the sanitary sewer system. Because the existing building is being demolished and all on-site roof drains, foundation drains, sump sumps will be removed; and because all on-site sanitary pipe will be removed, a I/I Inspection is not required. The Golden Valley Business Center will be constructing new sanitary services using gasketed PVC sanitary sewer pipe. The proposed manholes will be constructed with HDPE adjusting rings that are sealed with butyl caulk. The PVC sanitary sewer connections will incorporate rubber boots cast into the manhole barrels. All manhole barrel joints will be sealed with Infi-Shield external rubber seal wrap. The City will be inspecting the installation of the new sanitary sewer pipe and manholes. They will also be inspecting the connection to existing sanitary stubs and televising the stubs to Page 2 kimley-horn.com 767 Eustis Street, Suite 100, St. Paul, MN 55114 651-645-4197 identify existing cracks or leaks. The developer will be required to execute an escrow agreement for this inspection. Stormwater Requirements Summary The project site is located in Golden Valley, Minnesota and is within the jurisdiction of the Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission (BCWMC). The City of Golden Valley’s stormwater ordinance refers to the BCWMC standards as the requirements for site development projects. At this preliminary design stage, the BCWMC established standards covering floodplain requirements, stormwater discharge rate control and water quality treatment have been evaluated. Each is discussed further in the following sections. The standards listed below were taken from the document titled Requirements for Improvements and Development Projects, February 2021, available on the BCWMC website. The BCWMC does not issue permits, however does complete project reviews to determine consistency with the established standards. Floodplain Requirements The floodplain of the Bassett Creek trunk system is that area lying below the 1% (base flood elevation, 100–year) flood elevations as shown in Table 2-9 of the Watershed Management Plan (WMP), or as subsequently revised due to channel improvement, storage site development, revisions to reflect the current BCWMC adopted floodplain elevations, or requirements established by appropriate state or federal governmental agencies. Based on a review of Table 2-9 in the BCWMC WMP this area is not within the regulated floodplain of the BCWMC standards. BCWMC policies further state that the member cities must implement the BCWMC’s development policies, including minimum building elevations of at least 2 feet above the 100- year flood level for new and redeveloped structures. The City provided information on the modeled 100-year high water level (HWL) for the wetland areas located on the north end of the site. Figure 1 shows the modeled flood elevation for the on-site flood storage areas as provided by the City. Based on these established flood elevations, the minimum building elevations should be set at or above elevation 882.1. The preliminary plan established a low floor elevation for the lower of the two buildings as elevation 889.0, well above the required two- foot freeboard requirement. The modeled HWL for the site improvements will be evaluated as the design progresses, although we anticipate the elevation will be in the elevation range of up to 882-883 such that the low point inlets in the pavement areas set at elevation 883 will continue to drain during the 100-year event. Page 3 kimley-horn.com 767 Eustis Street, Suite 100, St. Paul, MN 55114 651-645-4197 Figure 1. Modeled Flood Elevations. Rate Control Requirements Proposed, nonlinear projects creating one or more acres of new and/or fully reconstructed impervious surfaces must manage stormwater runoff such that peak flow rates leaving the site are equal to or less than the existing rate leaving the site for the 2-, 10-, and 100-year events based on Atlas 14 precipitation amounts and using a nested 24-hour rainfall distribution. Documentation of existing and proposed discharge rates for the 2-, 10-, and 100- year events must be provided to the BCWMC for review. The existing site conditions include more than 20 acres of impervious surface and the proposed conditions will include on the order of 22 acres of impervious surface. In the existing condition, approximately half of the site runoff discharges to the north and northeast into the existing storage areas shown in Figure 1 above. This area outlets to north through an existing 36-inch RCP pipe that extends under the railroad. This outlet also drains off site areas that have not yet been evaluated. The other (approximate) half of the site discharges east into ditches and ultimately into the storm sewer system within Douglas Drive. In the proposed conditions, the creation of a stormwater filtration basin and detention system in the northern extent of the site will provide for necessary rate control. Preliminary assessment indicates that the existing rates are largely uncontrol for the south and east portion of the site such the added detention for the overall site will allow for meeting rate control for the overall site. Further discussion with the City and watershed should consider how much of the site could continue to be routed to the east into ditches and storm system along Douglas Drive. Water Quality Requirements Non-Linear Development projects that create one or more acres of new and/or fully reconstructed impervious surfaces are required to capture and retain onsite 1.1 inches of Page 4 kimley-horn.com 767 Eustis Street, Suite 100, St. Paul, MN 55114 651-645-4197 runoff from the new and/or fully reconstructed impervious surfaces. If the performance goal is not feasible and/or is not allowed for a proposed project, then the project proposer must implement the flexible treatment options, as shown in the BCWMC Design Sequence Flow Chart. The proposed site improvements will include a total new and reconstructed impervious area of approximately 22.03 acres. This impervious area results in a required on-site retention volume of 88,000 cubic feet (2.0 acre-feet). A geotechnical investigation was completed by Braun to evaluate on-site soil conditions. Two borings were completed in the immediate vicinity of the proposed stormwater basin, Borings 27 and 28. Soil conditions at the approximate bottom elevation of the basin are generally clays and organics which are not conducive to infiltration. Therefore, the proposed stormwater basin will be created as a filter basin with two feet of filtration media and an underdrain system. The proposed filtration basin will have a bottom elevation at approximately elevation 876.5 to allow for up to two feet of filter topsoil borrow filter media above an underdrain set at elevation 874.5. The outlet for the system will be the existing 36-inch RCP storm sewer that crosses the railroad with an existing invert at elevation 874.3. The preliminary grading plan for the basin provides the required retention/filtration volume at approximately elevation 879.0. An outlet control structure would be constructed on the north slope of the proposed basin to collect the tile discharge and will have an overflow grate set at the retention volume elevation to manage larger event flows. Wetland and Wetland Permitting Kimley-Horn completed a routine level 2 (onsite) wetland delineation on July 28th, 2021. Two wetlands were identified on the property, one located in a roadside ditch along Douglas Drive and the other in the northeast corner of the property. The wetland boundaries are subject to review by the City of Golden Valley, the Local Government Unit according to the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act, and the US Army Corps of Engineers. An application requesting their review and approval of the wetland delineation was submitted on August 18, 2021. A Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP) meeting has been scheduled for September 24, 2021 to review the delineated wetland boundaries and discuss the proposed redevelopment. In general, wetlands that were created unintentionally are not regulated resources. Based on discussions with the City, it was determined that the wetland in the northeast corner of the property has likely been wetland since pre-settlement conditions but was manipulated for stormwater purposes with the original development of the property (in roughly 1960); therefore, this wetland is anticipated to be regulated. In accordance with state and federal regulations, the applicant has evaluated options for avoiding and/or minimizing the wetland on the site with the proposed redevelopment. Through preliminary analysis, it has been determined that the purpose of the project cannot be met by avoiding or minimizing this impact; specifically, the redevelopment goals cannot be accomplished. Understanding the sensitivity for the City to maintain a portion of the property as a functioning wetland, the applicant has evaluated whether a portion of the current proposed site plan could provide for on-site wetland creation. Preliminary stormwater analysis for the redevelopment was conducted to understand the regulatory requirements of the Basset Creek Watershed Management Commission (BCWMC). Preliminary results indicate that, in order to meet the BCWMC established standards covering floodplain requirements, stormwater discharge rate Page 5 kimley-horn.com 767 Eustis Street, Suite 100, St. Paul, MN 55114 651-645-4197 control and water quality treatment, on-site mitigation is not feasible. Complications on the site include poor soils which prevent infiltration and an outlet pipe under the railroad north of the property that connects into the City’s storm sewer network. Through this comprehensive analysis, the applicant is proposing to purchase wetland credits to mitigate impacts to the wetland in the northeast corner of the property. Credits would be purchased from a wetland bank within the same Bank Service Area of the impacts, in accordance with state and federal regulations. Details of this evaluation will be documented in a WCA replacement plan which will be submitted for review and approval after the wetland boundary approval process has concluded. Approval of this plan is subject to review by both the City and the US Army Corps of Engineers and will be required prior to any activities within the delineated wetland boundary. Existing Tree Survey and Landscape Plan Significant Tree Inventory We have a tree survey that locates, identifies type and sizes of the significant existing trees. We will analyze each tree and indicate if it will be removed or preserved. If removed we will show any mitigation actions per code. The landscape plan will show the location of any trees that will be used for mitigated where possible. A completed matrix documenting theses actions will be provided. Landscape Plan Shade Trees, evergreen trees, flowering ornamental tree, shrubs, groundcovers, perennials and turf grasses will be provided in strategic locations to buffer adjacent properties and screen loading and service areas. Shrubs will be located to screen parking spaces from the public right of way. Trees will be added where possible to mitigate for the significant existing trees that will be removed. The storm water infiltration basin side slopes and bottom will be planted with appropriate native seed mixtures adaptive to the wet dry environment of the basin and soil types. All disturbed areas will be planted with live plants, turf, native seed mixes or shredded hardwood bark mulch. Landscape irrigation will be provided to supplement natural rain water during the growing season for the key turf areas with quick couplers strategically located for easy maintenance access to water. As the zoning process continues we will supplement the plan with more specific information like individual callouts of plants and detailed materials schedules. PROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:NOT FORCONSTRUCTION160576021ER/AN DDGOLDEN VALLEYBUSINESS CENTERGOLDEN VALLEYBUSINESS CENTERGOLDEN VALLEY, MNNo.Description Date 2021 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE: 651-645-4197 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.\\twcfp01\MW_TWC\TWC_LDEV\United_Properties\GOLDEN VALLEY INDUSTRIAL\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\C0-COVER SHEET.dwg September 23, 2021 - 8:24pm NORTHVICINITYN.T.S.SITEGOLDEN VALLEY, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MN1. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFIRM THAT THE EXISTING CONDITIONS FOR THE SITE MATCHWHAT IS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS INCLUDED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.2. IF REPRODUCED, THE SCALES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE BASED ON A ARCH FULLBLEED E1 (30.00 X 42.00 INCHES) SHEET.3. ALL NECESSARY INSPECTIONS AND/OR CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY CODES AND/ORUTILITY SERVICES COMPANIES SHALL BE PERFORMED PRIOR TO ANNOUNCED BUILDINGPOSSESSION AND THE FINAL CONNECTION OF SERVICES.4. ALL GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED (EARTHWORK, FINAL UTILITIES,AND FINAL GRADING) BY THE MILESTONE DATE IN PROJECT DOCUMENTS.NOTES:LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTGEOFFREY ROEHLL, ASLA, CLARBHITCHCOCK DESIGN GROUP22 E CHICAGO AVENUE, SUITE 200APO BOX 5126NAPERVILLE, IL 60567TELEPHONE: (630) 961-1787GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERNATHAN MCKINNEY, PEBRAUN INTERTEC11001 HAMPSHIRE AVENUE SMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55438TELEPHONE: (952) 995-2228PROJECT TEAM:ENGINEERKIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.PREPARED BY: THOMAS J. LINCOLNEUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100ST. PAUL, MN 55114TELEPHONE (651) 645-4197GOLDEN VALLEY BUSINESS CENTERFORDRAFT SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANSKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallARCHITECTESG ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN500 WASHINGTON AVENUE SOUTH,SUITE 1080MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55415TELEPHONE: (612) 339-5509SITE BENCHMARKS:(LOCATIONS SHOWN ON SURVEY)TOP OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION GEODETICMONUMENT "WIRTH"ELEVATION=834.60 FEET. (NGVD29)TOP OF EGAN FIELD & NOWAK CONTROL POINT NO. 700 (58 INCHREBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP)ELEVATION=909.33 FEET. (NGVD29)BENCHMARKSOWNER / DEVELOPERUNITED PROPERTIES651 NICOLLET MALL SUITE 450MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402TELEPHONE: (612) 343-7047SURVEYOREGAN, FIELD & NOWAK, INC.1229 TYLER STREET NE SUITE 100MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55413TELEPHONE: (612) 446-3300CHICAGO NORTHWESTERN RAILWAY DOUGLAS DRIVEOLSON MEM O R I A L H I G H W A Y COUNTRY C L U B D R I V E C000COVER SHEETDRAWING INDEXSheet NumberSheet TitleC000COVER SHEETC100GENERAL NOTESC200SURVEYC201SURVEYC202SURVEYC203DEMOLITION PLANC301OVERALL SITE PLANC302SITE PLANC303SITE PLANC400GRADING PLANC401GRADING PLANC402GRADING PLANC403STORM SEWER PLANC500UTILITY PLANC304 SITE PLAN- ADA ENLARGEMENT PROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:NOT FORCONSTRUCTION160576021ER/AN DDGOLDEN VALLEYBUSINESS CENTERGOLDEN VALLEYBUSINESS CENTERGOLDEN VALLEY, MNNo. Description Date 2021 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE: 651-645-4197 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.\\twcfp01\MW_TWC\TWC_LDEV\United_Properties\GOLDEN VALLEY INDUSTRIAL\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\C1-GENERAL NOTES.dwg September 23, 2021 - 8:24pm GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES1. THE CONTRACTOR AND SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THE CITY OF GOLDENVALLEY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION"(LATEST EDITION) AND BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THE CONTENTS PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK,AND, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM AS APPLICABLE TO THESESTANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS.2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR FURNISHING ALL MATERIAL AND LABOR TOCONSTRUCT THE FACILITY AS SHOWN AND DESCRIBED IN THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS INACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROPRIATE APPROVING AUTHORITIES, SPECIFICATIONS ANDREQUIREMENTS. CONTRACTOR SHALL CLEAR AND GRUB ALL AREAS UNLESS OTHERWISEINDICATED, REMOVING TREES, STUMPS, ROOTS, MUCK, EXISTING PAVEMENT AND ALL OTHERDELETERIOUS MATERIAL.3. THE EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THIS PLAN IS QUALITY LEVEL "D" UNLESSOTHERWISE NOTED. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINESOF CI/ACSE 38/02, ENTITLED STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OFSUBSURFACE QUALITY DATA BY THE FHA. EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE LOCATEDACCORDING TO THE INFORMATION AVAILABLE TO THE ENGINEER AT THE TIME OF THETOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY AND HAVE NOT BEEN INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIED BY THE OWNER OR THEENGINEER. GUARANTEE IS NOT MADE THAT ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARESHOWN OR THAT THE LOCATION OF THOSE SHOWN ARE ENTIRELY ACCURATE. FINDING THEACTUAL LOCATION OF ANY EXISTING UTILITIES IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY ANDSHALL BE DONE BEFORE COMMENCING ANY WORK IN THE VICINITY. FURTHERMORE, THECONTRACTOR SHALL BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES DUE TO THECONTRACTOR'S FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UNDERGROUNDUTILITIES. THE OWNER OR ENGINEER WILL ASSUME NO LIABILITY FOR ANY DAMAGESSUSTAINED OR COST INCURRED BECAUSE OF THE OPERATIONS IN THE VICINITY OF EXISTINGUTILITIES OR STRUCTURES, NOR FOR TEMPORARY BRACING AND SHORING OF SAME. IF IT ISNECESSARY TO SHORE, BRACE, SWING OR RELOCATE A UTILITY, THE UTILITY COMPANY ORDEPARTMENT AFFECTED SHALL BE CONTACTED AND THEIR PERMISSION OBTAINED REGARDINGTHE METHOD TO USE FOR SUCH WORK.4. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIESWHICH MAY HAVE BURIED OR AERIAL UTILITIES WITHIN OR NEAR THE CONSTRUCTION AREABEFORE COMMENCING WORK. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE 48 HOURS MINIMUM NOTICETO ALL UTILITY COMPANIES PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION.5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ALL REQUIRED CONSTRUCTIONPERMITS AND BONDS IF REQUIRED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE AVAILABLE AT THE JOB SITE AT ALL TIMES ONE COPY OF THECONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS INCLUDING PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, GEOTECHNICAL REPORTAND SPECIAL CONDITIONS AND COPIES OF ANY REQUIRED CONSTRUCTION PERMITS.7. ANY DISCREPANCIES ON THE DRAWINGS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTIONOF THE OWNER AND ENGINEER BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. NO FIELD CHANGES ORDEVIATIONS FROM DESIGN ARE TO BE MADE WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL OF THE OWNER ANDNOTIFICATION TO THE ENGINEER.8. ALL COPIES OF COMPACTION, CONCRETE AND OTHER REQUIRED TEST RESULTS ARE TO BESENT TO THE OWNER DIRECTLY FROM THE TESTING AGENCY.9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DOCUMENTING AND MAINTAINING AS-BUILTINFORMATION WHICH SHALL BE RECORDED AS CONSTRUCTION PROGRESSES OR AT THECOMPLETION OF APPROPRIATE CONSTRUCTION INTERVALS AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FORPROVIDING AS-BUILT DRAWINGS TO THE OWNER FOR THE PURPOSE OF CERTIFICATION TOJURISDICTIONAL AGENCIES AS REQUIRED. ALL AS-BUILT DATA SHALL BE COLLECTED BY ASTATE OF MN PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR WHOSE SERVICES ARE ENGAGED BY THECONTRACTOR.10. ANY WELLS DISCOVERED ON SITE THAT WILL HAVE NO USE MUST BE PLUGGED BY A LICENSEDWELL DRILLING CONTRACTOR IN A MANNER APPROVED BY ALL JURISDICTIONAL AGENCIES.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ANY WELL ABANDONMENT PERMITSREQUIRED.11. ANY WELL DISCOVERED DURING EARTH MOVING OR EXCAVATION SHALL BE REPORTED TO THEAPPROPRIATE JURISDICTIONAL AGENCIES WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER DISCOVERY IS MADE.12. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING THAT THE PROPOSEDIMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS DO NOT CONFLICT WITH ANY KNOWN EXISTING OROTHER PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. IF ANY CONFLICTS ARE DISCOVERED, THE CONTRACTORSHALL NOTIFY THE OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY PORTION OF THE SITE WORK THATWOULD BE AFFECTED. FAILURE TO NOTIFY OWNER OF AN IDENTIFIABLE CONFLICT PRIOR TOPROCEEDING WITH INSTALLATION RELIEVES OWNER OF ANY OBLIGATION TO PAY FOR ARELATED CHANGE ORDER.13. SHOULD CONTRACTOR ENCOUNTER ANY DEBRIS LADEN SOIL, STRUCTURES NOT IDENTIFIED INTHE DOCUMENTS, OR OTHER SOURCE OF POTENTIAL CONTAMINATION, THEY SHALLIMMEDIATELY CONTACT THE ENGINEER AND OWNER.TYPICAL OWNER/ENGINEER OBSERVATIONSCONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY OWNER AND/OR ENGINEER 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THEFOLLOWING ACTIVITIES:- PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING, SUBGRADE PREPARATION, BASE INSTALLATIONASPHALT INSTALLATION, UNDERGROUND PIPING AND UTILITIES INSTALLATION,INSTALLATION OF STRUCTURES, CHECK VALVES, HYDRANTS, METERS, ETC., SIDEWALKINSTALLATION, CONNECTIONS TO WATER AND SEWER MAINS, TESTS OF UTILITIES3RD PARTY TEST REPORTS REQ'DTEST REPORTS REQUIRED FOR CLOSE OUT INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO:- DENSITY TEST REPORTS- BACTERIOLOGICAL TESTS OF WATER SYSTEM- PRESSURE TEST OF WATER/SEWER- LEAK TESTS ON SEWER SYSTEM AND GREASE TRAPS- ANY OTHER TESTING REQUIRED BY THE AGENCY/MUNICIPALITYWATER STORM SEWER & SANITARY SEWER NOTES1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT GRAVITY SEWER LATERALS, MANHOLES, GRAVITY SEWERLINES, AND DOMESTIC WATER AND FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS. THECONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH ALL NECESSARY MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, MACHINERY, TOOLS,MEANS OF TRANSPORTATION AND LABOR NECESSARY TO COMPLETE THE WORK IN FULL ANDCOMPLETE ACCORDANCE WITH THE SHOWN, DESCRIBED AND REASONABLY INTENDEDREQUIREMENTS OF THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY REQUIREMENTS.IN THE EVENT THAT THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND THE JURISDICTIONAL AGENCYREQUIREMENTS ARE NOT IN AGREEMENT, THE MOST STRINGENT SHALL GOVERN.2. ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. THE CONTRACTORSHALL COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS FOR UTILITY LOCATION AND COORDINATION INACCORDANCE WITH THE NOTES CONTAINED IN THE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION SECTION OF THISSHEET.3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALL DISTURBED VEGETATION IN KIND, UNLESS SHOWNOTHERWISE.4. DEFLECTION OF PIPE JOINTS AND CURVATURE OF PIPE SHALL NOT EXCEED THEMANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. SECURELY CLOSE ALL OPEN ENDS OF PIPE AND FITTINGSWITH A WATERTIGHT PLUG WHEN WORK IS NOT IN PROGRESS. THE INTERIOR OF ALL PIPESSHALL BE CLEAN AND JOINT SURFACES WIPED CLEAN AND DRY AFTER THE PIPE HAS BEENLOWERED INTO THE TRENCH. VALVES SHALL BE PLUMB AND LOCATED ACCORDING TO THEPLANS.5. ALL PIPE AND FITTINGS SHALL BE CAREFULLY STORED FOLLOWING MANUFACTURER'SRECOMMENDATIONS. CARE SHALL BE TAKEN TO AVOID DAMAGE TO THE COATING OR LINING INANY D.I. PIPE FITTINGS. ANY PIPE OR FITTING WHICH IS DAMAGED OR WHICH HAS FLAWS ORIMPERFECTIONS WHICH, IN THE OPINION OF THE ENGINEER OR OWNER, RENDERS IT UNFIT FORUSE, SHALL NOT BE USED. ANY PIPE NOT SATISFACTORY FOR USE SHALL BE CLEARLY MARKEDAND IMMEDIATELY REMOVED FROM THE JOB SITE, AND SHALL BE REPLACED AT THECONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE.6. WATER FOR FIRE FIGHTING SHALL BE MADE AVAILABLE FOR USE BY THE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TOCOMBUSTIBLES BEING BROUGHT ON SITE.7. ALL UTILITY AND STORM DRAIN TRENCHES LOCATED UNDER AREAS TO RECEIVE PAVING SHALL BECOMPLETELY BACK FILLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE GOVERNING JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY'SSPECIFICATIONS. IN THE EVENT THAT THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND THE JURISDICTIONALAGENCY REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT IN AGREEMENT, THE MOST STRINGENT SHALL GOVERN.8. UNDERGROUND LINES SHALL BE SURVEYED BY A STATE OF MN PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORPRIOR TO BACK FILLING.9. CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM, AT HIS OWN EXPENSE, ANY AND ALL TESTS REQUIRED BY THESPECIFICATIONS AND/OR ANY AGENCY HAVING JURISDICTION. THESE TESTS MAY INCLUDE, BUTMAY NOT BE LIMITED TO, INFILTRATION AND EXFILTRATION, TELEVISION INSPECTION AND AMANDREL TEST ON GRAVITY SEWER. A COPY OF THE TEST RESULTS SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THEUTILITY PROVIDER, OWNER AND JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY AS REQUIRED.10. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE FOR A MINIMUM HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE OF 10' AND A VERTICALCLEARANCE OF 18" BETWEEN WATER AND SANITARY SEWER MANHOLES AND LINES.11. IF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES TO REMAIN ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION IT SHALL BETHE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO REPAIR AND/OR REPLACE THE EXISTING STRUCTURE ASNECESSARY TO RETURN IT TO EXISTING CONDITIONS OR BETTER.12. ALL STORM PIPE ENTERING STRUCTURES SHALL BE GROUTED TO ASSURE CONNECTION ATSTRUCTURE IS WATERTIGHT UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED BY CITY AND STATE DESIGNSTANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS.13. UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED IN CITY AND STATE DESIGN STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS, ALLSTORM SEWER MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE FLUSH WITH PAVEMENT, AND SHALL HAVETRAFFIC BEARING RING & COVERS. MANHOLES IN UNPAVED AREAS SHALL BE 6" ABOVE FINISHGRADE. LIDS SHALL BE LABELED "STORM SEWER". EXISTING CASTINGS AND STRUCTURES WITHINPROJECT LIMITS SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO MEET THESE CONDITIONS AND THE PROPOSED FINISHEDGRADE.14. TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION IS TAKEN FROM A TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY BY LAND SURVEYORS. IFTHE CONTRACTOR DOES NOT ACCEPT EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS,WITHOUT EXCEPTION, THEN THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLY, AT THEIR EXPENSE, ATOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR TO THE OWNER FOR REVIEW.15. CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE GOVERNING CODES AND BECONSTRUCTED TO SAME.16. ALL STORM STRUCTURES SHALL HAVE A SMOOTH UNIFORM POURED MORTAR FROM INVERT IN TOINVERT OUT.17. ROOF DRAINS SHALL BE CONNECTED TO STORM SEWER BY PREFABRICATED WYES OR AT STORMSTRUCTURES. ROOF DRAINS AND TRUCK WELL DRAIN SHALL RUN AT A MINIMUM 1% SLOPE,UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, AND TIE IN AT THE CENTERLINE OF THE STORM MAIN.18. ALL ROOF AND SANITARY SEWER DRAINS SHALL BE INSULATED IF 7' OF COVER CANNOT BEPROVIDED.19. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND APPURTENANCESTHAT ARE TO REMAIN FROM DAMAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS.20. THE LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES, STORM DRAINAGE STRUCTURES AND OTHER ABOVE ANDBELOW-GRADE IMPROVEMENTS ARE APPROXIMATE AS SHOWN. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'SRESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION, SIZE AND INVERT ELEVATIONS OF EACHPRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION.21. A MINIMUM OF 5' SEPARATION IS REQUIRED BETWEEN UTILITIES AND TREES UNLESS A ROOTBARRIER IS UTILIZED.22. GAS, PHONE AND ELECTRIC SERVICES SHOWN FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. DRYUTILITY COMPANIES MAY ALTER THE DESIGN LAYOUT DURING THEIR REVIEW. CONTRACTOR TOCOORDINATE FINAL DESIGN AND INSTALLATION WITH UTILITY COMPANIES.23. COORDINATE UTILITY INSTALLATION WITH IRRIGATION DESIGN AND INSTALLATION.24. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FLOW LINE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. PERIMETER WALLDIMENSIONS ARE TO INSIDE WALL FACE. REFERENCE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT WALLWIDTH AND SPECIFICATIONS.25. REFERENCE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS (BY OTHERS). FOR EXACT BUILDING DIMENSIONS, ANDMATERIALS SPECIFICATIONS.26. REFERENCE M.E.P. PLANS (BY OTHERS) FOR MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT DIMENSIONS ANDSPECIFICATIONS.27. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE STRUCTURAL PLANS (BY OTHERS) FOR MECHANICALEQUIPMENT DIMENSIONS AND PAD PREPARATION SPECIFICATIONS.28. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE M.E.P PLANS (BY OTHERS) FOR LIGHT POLE WIRING.GRADING AND DRAINAGE NOTES1. GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL VERIFY THE SUITABILITY OF ALLEXISTING AND PROPOSED SITE CONDITIONS INCLUDING GRADES AND DIMENSIONS BEFORESTART OF CONSTRUCTION. THE ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY OF ANYDISCREPANCIES.2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL GRADE THE SITE TO THE ELEVATIONS INDICATED AND SHALL ADJUSTBMP'S AS NECESSARY AND REGRADE WASHOUTS WHERE THEY OCCUR AFTER EVERY RAINFALLUNTIL A GRASS STAND IS WELL ESTABLISHED OR ADEQUATE STABILIZATION OCCURS.3. CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE THERE IS POSITIVE DRAINAGE FROM THE PROPOSED BUILDINGSSO THAT SURFACE RUNOFF WILL DRAIN BY GRAVITY TO NEW OR EXISTING DRAINAGE OUTLETS.CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE NO PONDING OCCURS IN PAVED AREAS AND SHALL NOTIFYENGINEER IF ANY GRADING DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND IN THE EXISTING AND PROPOSEDGRADES PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF PAVEMENT OR UTILITIES.4. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL MANHOLE COVERS, VALVE COVERS, VAULT LIDS, FIREHYDRANTS, POWER POLES, GUY WIRES, AND TELEPHONE BOXES THAT ARE TO REMAIN INPLACE AND UNDISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION. EXISTING CASTINGS AND STRUCTURES TOREMAIN SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO MATCH THE PROPOSED FINISHED GRADES.5. BACKFILL FOR UTILITY LINES SHALL BE PLACED PER DETAILS, STANDARDS, ANDSPECIFICATIONS SO THAT THE UTILITY WILL BE STABLE. WHERE UTILITY LINES CROSS THEPARKING LOT, THE TOP 6 INCHES SHALL BE COMPACTED SIMILARLY TO THE REMAINDER OF THELOT. UTILITY DITCHES SHALL BE VISUALLY INSPECTED DURING THE EXCAVATION PROCESS TOENSURE THAT UNDESIRABLE FILL IS NOT USED.6. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT OF 4" OF TOPSOIL ATCOMPLETION OF WORK. ALL UNPAVED AREAS IN EXISTING RIGHTS-OF-WAY DISTURBED BYCONSTRUCTION SHALL BE REGRADED AND SODDED.7. AFTER PLACEMENT OF SUBGRADE AND PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF PAVEMENT, CONTRACTORSHALL TEST AND OBSERVE PAVEMENT AREAS FOR EVIDENCE OF PONDING. ALL AREAS SHALLADEQUATELY DRAIN TOWARDS THE INTENDED STRUCTURE TO CONVEY STORM RUNOFF.CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY OWNER AND ENGINEER IF ANY DISCREPANCIES AREDISCOVERED.8. WHERE EXISTING PAVEMENT IS INDICATED TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED, THE CONTRACTORSHALL SAW CUT FULL DEPTH FOR A SMOOTH AND STRAIGHT JOINT AND REPLACE THEPAVEMENT WITH THE SAME TYPE AND DEPTH OF MATERIAL AS EXISTING OR AS INDICATED.9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL PROTECTION OVER ALL DRAINAGE STRUCTURES FOR THEDURATION OF CONSTRUCTION AND UNTIL ACCEPTANCE OF THE PROJECT BY THE OWNER. ALLDRAINAGE STRUCTURES SHALL BE CLEANED OF DEBRIS AS REQUIRED DURING AND AT THE ENDOF CONSTRUCTION TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE FLOWS.10. IF DEWATERING IS REQUIRED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ANY APPLICABLE REQUIREDPERMITS. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO COORDINATE WITH THE OWNER AND THE DESIGN ENGINEERPRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION.11. FIELD DENSITY TESTS SHALL BE TAKEN AT INTERVALS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LOCALJURISDICTIONAL AGENCY OR TO DOT STANDARDS. IN THE EVENT THAT THE CONTRACTDOCUMENTS AND THE JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT IN AGREEMENT, THEMOST STRINGENT SHALL GOVERN.12. ALL SLOPES AND AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE GRADED AS PER PLANS. THEAREAS SHALL THEN BE SODDED OR SEEDED AS SPECIFIED IN THE PLANS, FERTILIZED,MULCHED, WATERED AND MAINTAINED UNTIL HARDY GRASS GROWTH IS ESTABLISHED IN ALLAREAS. ANY AREAS DISTURBED FOR ANY REASON PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE JOBSHALL BE CORRECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. ALLEARTHEN AREAS WILL BE SODDED OR SEEDED AND MULCHED AS SHOWN ON THELANDSCAPING PLAN.13. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONTROL OF DUST AND DIRT RISING ANDSCATTERING IN THE AIR DURING CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL PROVIDE WATER SPRINKLING OROTHER SUITABLE METHODS OF CONTROL. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH ALLGOVERNING REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION.14. SOD, WHERE CALLED FOR, MUST BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED ON EXPOSED SLOPES WITHIN48 HOURS OF COMPLETING FINAL GRADING, AND AT ANY OTHER TIME AS NECESSARY, TOPREVENT EROSION, SEDIMENTATION OR TURBID DISCHARGES.15. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE THAT LANDSCAPE ISLAND PLANTING AREAS AND OTHERPLANTING AREAS ARE NOT COMPACTED AND DO NOT CONTAIN ROAD BASE MATERIALS. THECONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO EXCAVATE AND REMOVE ALL UNDESIRABLE MATERIAL FROM ALLAREAS ON THE SITE TO BE PLANTED AND PROPERLY DISPOSED OF IN A LEGAL MANNER.16. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL UNDERGROUND STORM WATER PIPING PERMANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS AND DOT SPECIFICATION.17. ALL CONCRETE/ASPHALT SHALL BE INSTALLED PER GEOTECH REPORT, CITY OF GOLDENVALLEY AND DOT SPECIFICATIONS.18. SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE TO FLOWLINE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.19. LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION ARE TO THE PROPERTY LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED ON THEPLAN.20. IMMEDIATELY REPORT TO THE OWNER ANY DISCREPANCIES FOUND BETWEEN ACTUAL FIELDCONDITIONS AND CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS.21. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING AND PROTECTING EXISTING UTILITIES, ANDSHALL REPAIR ALL DAMAGE TO EXISTING UTILITIES THAT OCCUR DURING CONSTRUCTIONWITHOUT COMPENSATION.22. BLEND NEW EARTHWORK SMOOTHLY TO TRANSITION BACK TO EXISTING GRADE.23. ALL PROPOSED GRADES ONSITE SHALL BE 3:1 OR FLATTER UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED ONTHE PLANS. ANY SLOPES STEEPER THAN 4:1 REQUIRE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLBLANKET.24. ADHERE TO ALL TERMS AND CONDITIONS AS NECESSARY IN THE GENERAL N.P.D.E.S. PERMITAND STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN FOR STORMWATER DISCHARGEASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.25. ADJUST AND/OR CUT EXISTING PAVEMENT AS NECESSARY TO ASSURE A SMOOTH FIT ANDCONTINUOUS GRADE.26. CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE MINIMUM GRADES ARE MET WITHIN PAVED AREAS, 1.2% FORASPHALT PAVING AND 0.6% FOR CONCRETE PAVING.EROSION CONTROL NOTES1. THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN ("SWPPP") IS COMPRISED OF THE EROSIONCONTROL PLAN, THE STANDARD DETAILS, THE PLAN NARRATIVE, ATTACHMENTS INCLUDED INTHE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE SWPPP, PLUS THE PERMIT AND ALL SUBSEQUENT REPORTS ANDRELATED DOCUMENTS.2. ALL CONTRACTORS AND SUBCONTRACTORS INVOLVED WITH STORM WATER POLLUTIONPREVENTION SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN ANDTHE STATE OF MN NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM GENERAL PERMIT(NPDES PERMIT) AND BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THEIR CONTENTS.3. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP'S) AND CONTROLS SHALL CONFORM TO FEDERAL, STATE,OR LOCAL REQUIREMENTS OR MANUAL OF PRACTICE, AS APPLICABLE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALLIMPLEMENT ADDITIONAL CONTROLS AS DIRECTED BY THE PERMITTING AGENCY OR OWNER.4. SITE ENTRY AND EXIT LOCATIONS SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION THAT WILL PREVENTTHE TRACKING OR FLOWING OF SEDIMENT ONTO PUBLIC ROADWAYS. ALL SEDIMENT SPILLED,DROPPED, WASHED, OR TRACKED ON A PUBLIC ROADWAY MUST BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY.WHEN WASHING IS REQUIRED TO REMOVE SEDIMENT PRIOR TO ENTRANCE ONTO A PUBLICROADWAY, IT SHALL BE DONE IN AN AREA STABILIZED WITH CRUSHED STONE WHICH DRAINSINTO AN APPROVED SEDIMENT BASIN. ALL FINES IMPOSED FOR DISCHARGING SEDIMENT ONTOPUBLIC AREAS SHALL BE PAID BY THE CONTRACTOR.5. TEMPORARY SEEDING OR OTHER APPROVED METHODS OF STABILIZATION SHALL BE INITIATEDWITHIN 7 DAYS OF THE LAST DISTURBANCE ON ANY AREA OF THE SITE.6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE CLEARING TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PRACTICAL OR ASREQUIRED BY THE GENERAL PERMIT.7. CONTRACTOR SHALL DENOTE ON PLAN THE TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGE AREA WHICHSHALL ALSO BE USED AS THE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE AND CLEANING AREA, EMPLOYEEPARKING AREA, AND AREA FOR LOCATING PORTABLE FACILITIES, OFFICE TRAILERS, AND TOILETFACILITIES.8. ALL WASH WATER (CONCRETE TRUCKS, VEHICLE CLEANING, EQUIPMENT CLEANING, ETC.)SHALL BE DETAINED AND PROPERLY TREATED OR DISPOSED.9. SUFFICIENT OIL AND GREASE ABSORBING MATERIALS AND FLOTATION BOOMS SHALL BEMAINTAINED ON SITE OR READILY AVAILABLE TO CONTAIN AND CLEAN-UP FUEL OR CHEMICALSPILLS AND LEAKS.10. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DUST CONTROL ON SITE. THE USE OF MOTOROILS AND OTHER PETROLEUM BASED OR TOXIC LIQUIDS FOR DUST SUPPRESSION OPERATIONSIS PROHIBITED.11. RUBBISH, TRASH, GARBAGE, LITTER, OR OTHER SUCH MATERIALS SHALL BE DEPOSITED INTOSEALED CONTAINERS. MATERIALS SHALL BE PREVENTED FROM LEAVING THE PREMISESTHROUGH THE ACTION OF WIND OR STORM WATER DISCHARGE INTO DRAINAGE DITCHES ORWATERS OF THE STATE.12. ALL STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION MEASURES PRESENTED ON THE PLAN SHALL BEINITIATED AS SOON AS IS PRACTICABLE.13. ALL STAGING AREAS, STOCKPILES, SPOILS, ETC. SHALL BE LOCATED SUCH THAT THEY WILL NOTADVERSELY AFFECT STORM WATER QUALITY. OTHERWISE, COVERING OR ENCIRCLING THESEAREAS WITH SOME PROTECTIVE MEASURE WILL BE NECESSARY.14. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR RE-ESTABLISHING ANY EROSION CONTROL DEVICEWHICH THEY DISTURB. EACH CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE OFANY DEFICIENCIES IN THE ESTABLISHED EROSION CONTROL MEASURES THAT MAY LEAD TOUNAUTHORIZED DISCHARGE OR STORM WATER POLLUTION, SEDIMENTATION, OR OTHERPOLLUTANTS. UNAUTHORIZED POLLUTANTS INCLUDE (BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO) EXCESSCONCRETE DUMPING OR CONCRETE RESIDUE, PAINTS, SOLVENTS, GREASES, FUEL ANDLUBRICANT OIL, PESTICIDES, AND ANY SOLID WASTE MATERIALS.15. EROSION CONTROL DEVICES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO THESTART OF LAND-DISTURBING ACTIVITIES ON THE PROJECT.16. ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES ARE TO BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVEDPLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THIS PROJECT. CHANGES ARE TO BE APPROVED BEFORECONSTRUCTION BY THE DESIGN ENGINEER AND THE CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY ENGINEERINGDIVISION.17. IF THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN AS APPROVED CANNOT CONTROL EROSION AND OFF-SITESEDIMENTATION FROM THE PROJECT, THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN WILL HAVE TO BE REVISEDAND/OR ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES WILL BE REQUIRED ON SITE. ANY REVISIONSTO THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN MADE BY THE CONTRACTOR MUST BE APPROVED BY THEENGINEER.EROSION CONTROL MAINTENANCEALL MEASURES STATED ON THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN, AND IN THE STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN, SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN FULLY FUNCTIONAL CONDITION ASREQUIRED BY ALL JURISDICTIONS UNTIL NO LONGER REQUIRED FOR A COMPLETED PHASE OFWORK OR FINAL STABILIZATION OF THE SITE. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROLMEASURES SHALL BE CHECKED BY A CERTIFIED PERSON AT LEAST ONCE EVERY 7 CALENDAR DAYSAND WITHIN 24 HOURS OF THE END OF A 0.5" RAINFALL EVENT, AND CLEANED AND REPAIRED INACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING:INLET PROTECTION DEVICES AND BARRIERS SHALL BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED IF THEY SHOWSIGNS OF UNDERMINING, OR DETERIORATION.1. ALL SEEDED AREAS SHALL BE CHECKED REGULARLY TO SEE THAT A GOOD STAND ISMAINTAINED. AREAS SHOULD BE FERTILIZED, WATERED AND RESEEDED AS NEEDED. FORMAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS REFER TO THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS.2. SILT FENCES SHALL BE REPAIRED TO THEIR ORIGINAL CONDITIONS IF DAMAGED. SEDIMENTSHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SILT FENCES WHEN IT REACHES ONE-THIRD THE HEIGHT OF THESILT FENCE.3. THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE(S) SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION WHICH WILLPREVENT TRACKING OR FLOW OF MUD ONTO PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY. THIS MAY REQUIREPERIODIC TOP DRESSING OF THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES AS CONDITIONS DEMAND.4. THE TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGE AREA SHALL BE KEPT IN GOOD CONDITION (SUITABLEFOR PARKING AND STORAGE). THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC TOP DRESSING OF THETEMPORARY PARKING AS CONDITIONS DEMAND.5. ALL MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS SHALL BE DONE IN A TIMELY MANNER BUT IN NO CASE LATERTHAN 2 CALENDAR DAYS FOLLOWING THE INSPECTION.PAVING AND STRIPING NOTES1. ALL PAVING, CONSTRUCTION, MATERIALS, AND WORKMANSHIP WITHIN JURISDICTION'SRIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL OR COUNTY SPECIFICATIONS ANDSTANDARDS (LATEST EDITION) OR DOT SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS (LATEST EDITION) IFNOT COVERED BY LOCAL OR COUNTY REGULATIONS.2. ALL SIGNS, PAVEMENT MARKINGS, AND OTHER TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TOMANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (M.U.T.C.D) AND CITY STANDARDS.3. CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH ALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS FOR FIRE LANES, ROADWAY LANES,PARKING STALLS, ACCESSIBLE PARKING SYMBOLS, ACCESS AISLES, STOP BARS AND SIGNS,AND MISCELLANEOUS STRIPING WITHIN THE PARKING LOT AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS.4. ALL EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL EXTEND THROUGH THE CURB.5. THE MINIMUM LENGTH OF OFFSET JOINTS AT RADIUS POINTS SHALL BE 2 FEET.6. ALL JOINTS, INCLUDING EXPANSION JOINTS WITH REMOVABLE TACK STRIPS, SHALL BE SEALEDWITH JOINT SEALANT.7. THE MATERIALS AND PROPERTIES OF ALL CONCRETE SHALL MEET THE APPLICABLEREQUIREMENTS IN THE A.C.I. (AMERICAN CONCRETE INSTITUTE) MANUAL OF CONCRETEPRACTICE.8. CONTRACTOR SHALL APPLY A SECOND COATING OVER ALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS PRIOR TOACCEPTANCE BY OWNER FOLLOWED BY A COAT OF GLASS BEADS AS APPLICABLE PER THEPROJECT DOCUMENTS.9. ANY EXISTING PAVEMENT, CURBS AND/OR SIDEWALKS DAMAGED OR REMOVED WILL BEREPAIRED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT HIS EXPENSE TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER ANDOWNER.10. BEFORE PLACING PAVEMENT, CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY SUITABLE ACCESSIBLE ROUTES(PER A.D.A). GRADING FOR ALL SIDEWALKS AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES INCLUDING CROSSINGDRIVEWAYS SHALL CONFORM TO CURRENT ADA STATE/NATIONAL STANDARDS. IN NO CASESHALL ACCESSIBLE RAMP SLOPES EXCEED 1 VERTICAL TO 12 HORIZONTAL. IN NO CASE SHALLSIDEWALK CROSS SLOPES EXCEED 2% . IN NO CASE SHALL LONGITUDINAL SIDEWALK SLOPESEXCEED 5%. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS OR AISLES EXCEED 2% (1.5%TARGET) IN ALL DIRECTIONS. SIDEWALK ACCESS TO EXTERNAL BUILDING DOORS AND GATESSHALL BE ADA COMPLIANT. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF ADACRITERIA CANNOT BE MET IN ANY LOCATION PRIOR TO PAVING. NO CONTRACTOR CHANGEORDERS WILL BE ACCEPTED FOR A.D.A COMPLIANCE ISSUES.11. MAXIMUM JOINT SPACING IS TWICE THE DEPTH OF THE CONCRETE PAVEMENT IN FEET.REFER TO GEOTECHNICAL REPORT NO. <XXXX><CONSULTANT><LOCATION>DATED <MONTH, DAY, YEAR>C100GENERALNOTES PROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:NOT FORCONSTRUCTION160576021ER/AN DDGOLDEN VALLEYBUSINESS CENTERGOLDEN VALLEYBUSINESS CENTERGOLDEN VALLEY, MNNo. Description Date 2021 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE: 651-645-4197 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.\\twcfp01\MW_TWC\TWC_LDEV\United_Properties\GOLDEN VALLEY INDUSTRIAL\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN.dwg September 23, 2021 - 8:25pm C200SURVEY PROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:NOT FORCONSTRUCTION160576021ER/AN DDGOLDEN VALLEYBUSINESS CENTERGOLDEN VALLEYBUSINESS CENTERGOLDEN VALLEY, MNNo. Description Date 2021 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE: 651-645-4197 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.\\twcfp01\MW_TWC\TWC_LDEV\United_Properties\GOLDEN VALLEY INDUSTRIAL\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN.dwg September 23, 2021 - 8:25pm C201SURVEY PROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:NOT FORCONSTRUCTION160576021ER/AN DDGOLDEN VALLEYBUSINESS CENTERGOLDEN VALLEYBUSINESS CENTERGOLDEN VALLEY, MNNo. Description Date 2021 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE: 651-645-4197 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.\\twcfp01\MW_TWC\TWC_LDEV\United_Properties\GOLDEN VALLEY INDUSTRIAL\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN.dwg September 23, 2021 - 8:25pm C202SURVEY COUNTRY C L U B D R I V E DOUGLAS DRIVE NORTHCHICAGO NORTHWESTERN RAILROAD ROW TYP.SITE LIGHTTYP.TYP.TYP.TYP.TYP.SITE LIGHTTYP.SITE LIGHTTYP.TYP.TYP.TYP.TYP.TYP.RELO.CBTYP.TYP.TYP.TYP.TYP.TYP.TYP.TYP.GGGDDDDDBBCAAAAEEHIJJEFFFLKEEEEEEEEBBBHLLLHFFFPROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:NOT FORCONSTRUCTION160576021ER/AN DDGOLDEN VALLEYBUSINESS CENTERGOLDEN VALLEYBUSINESS CENTERGOLDEN VALLEY, MNNo. Description Date 2021 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE: 651-645-4197 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.\\twcfp01\MW_TWC\TWC_LDEV\United_Properties\GOLDEN VALLEY INDUSTRIAL\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\C2-DEMO PLAN.dwg September 23, 2021 - 8:26pm 1. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DEMOLITION, REMOVAL, AND DISPOSAL (IN A LOCATIONAPPROVED BY ALL GOVERNING AUTHORITIES) ALL STRUCTURES, PADS, WALLS, FLUMES, FOUNDATIONS,PARKING, DRIVES, DRAINAGE STRUCTURES, UTILITIES, ETC. SUCH THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS ON THEPLANS CAN BE CONSTRUCTED. ALL FACILITIES TO BE REMOVED SHALL BE UNDERCUT TO SUITABLEMATERIAL AND BROUGHT TO GRADE WITH SUITABLE COMPACTED FILL MATERIAL PER THE PROJECTDOCUMENTS.2. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVING ALL DEBRIS FROM THE SITE AND DISPOSING THEDEBRIS IN A LAWFUL MANNER. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ALL PERMITSREQUIRED FOR DEMOLITION AND DISPOSAL. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE COPIES OF THE PERMIT ANDRECEIPTS OF DISPOSAL OF MATERIALS TO THE OWNER AND OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE.3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ALL UTILITY SERVICES TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES AT ALL TIMES.UTILITY SERVICES SHALL NOT BE INTERRUPTED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE CONSTRUCTIONMANAGER AND COORDINATION WITH THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND/OR THE CITY.4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH RESPECTIVE UTILITY COMPANIES PRIOR TO THE REMOVALAND/OR RELOCATION OF UTILITIES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE UTILITY COMPANYCONCERNING PORTIONS OF WORK WHICH MAY BE PERFORMED BY THE UTILITY COMPANY'S FORCESAND ANY FEES WHICH ARE TO BE PAID TO THE UTILITY COMPANY FOR THEIR SERVICES. THECONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PAYING ALL FEES AND CHARGES.5. THE LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ON THE PLAN HAVE BEEN DETERMINED FROM THEBEST INFORMATION AVAILABLE AND ARE GIVEN FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE CONTRACTOR. THEENGINEER ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THEIR ACCURACY. PRIOR TO THE START OF ANYDEMOLITION ACTIVITY, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE UTILITY COMPANIES FOR LOCATIONS OFEXISTING UTILITIES WITHIN ALL AREAS OF PROPOSED WORK.6. ALL EXISTING SEWERS, PIPING AND UTILITIES SHOWN ARE NOT TO BE INTERPRETED AS THE EXACTLOCATION, OR AS ANY OBSTACLES THAT MAY OCCUR ON THE SITE. VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS ANDPROCEED WITH CAUTION AROUND ANY ANTICIPATED FEATURES. GIVE NOTICE TO ALL UTILITYCOMPANIES REGARDING DESTRUCTION AND REMOVAL OF ALL SERVICE LINES AND CAP ALL LINESBEFORE PRECEDING WITH THE WORK.7. ELECTRICAL, TELEPHONE, CABLE, WATER, FIBER OPTIC, AND/OR GAS LINES NEEDING TO BE REMOVEDOR RELOCATED SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE AFFECTED UTILITY COMPANY. ADEQUATE TIMESHALL BE PROVIDED FOR RELOCATION AND CLOSE COORDINATION WITH THE UTILITY COMPANY ISNECESSARY TO PROVIDE A SMOOTH TRANSITION IN UTILITY SERVICE. CONTRACTOR SHALL PAY CLOSEATTENTION TO EXISTING UTILITIES WITHIN ANY ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY DURING CONSTRUCTION.8. CONTRACTOR MUST PROTECT THE PUBLIC AT ALL TIMES WITH FENCING, BARRICADES, ENCLOSURES,ETC. (AND OTHER APPROPRIATE BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES) AS APPROVED BY THE CONSTRUCTIONMANAGER. MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC CONTROL SHALL BE COORDINATED IN ACCORDANCE WITHXXXXXXX, <COUNTY> COUNTY AND XX/DOT.9. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ACCESS TO ALL ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING CONSTRUCTION, ANDSHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTIES IF ACCESS WILL BE INTERRUPTED OR ALTERED AT ANY TIME DURINGCONSTRUCTION.10. PRIOR TO DEMOLITION OCCURRING, ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES ARE TO BE INSTALLED.11. CONTRACTOR MAY LIMIT SAW-CUT AND PAVEMENT REMOVAL TO ONLY THOSE AREAS WHERE IT ISREQUIRED AS SHOWN ON THESE CONSTRUCTION PLANS BUT IF ANY DAMAGE IS INCURRED ON ANY OFTHE SURROUNDING PAVEMENT, ETC. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ITS REMOVAL ANDREPAIR.12. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WATER MAIN WORK WITH THE FIRE DEPT. AND THE CITY WATERDEPARTMENT TO PLAN PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AND TO ENSURE ADEQUATE FIRE PROTECTION ISCONSTANTLY AVAILABLE TO THE SITE THROUGHOUT THIS SPECIFIC WORK AND THROUGH ALL PHASESOF CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ARRANGING/PROVIDING ANY REQUIREDWATER MAIN SHUT OFFS WITH THE CITY OF XXXXXXX DURING CONSTRUCTION. ANY COSTS ASSOCIATEDWITH WATER MAIN SHUT OFFS WILL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND NO EXTRACOMPENSATION WILL BE PROVIDED.13. REFER TO SURVEY FOR ALL EXISTING INVERT AND RIM ELEVATIONS.14. ALL UTILITIES SHOWN ARE EXISTING UTILITIES.15. IN THE EVENT A WELL IS FOUND, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEER AND OWNERIMMEDIATELY. ALL WELLS SHALL BE SEALED BY A LICENSED WELL CONTRACTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITHALL STATE OF XX REQUIREMENTS.16. IN THE EVENT THAT UNKNOWN CONTAINERS OR TANKS ARE ENCOUNTERED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALLCONTACT THE OWNER AND/OR OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE IMMEDIATELY. ALL CONTAINERS SHALL BEDISPOSED OF AT A PERMITTED LANDFILL PER THE PROJECT DOCUMENTS.17. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IF ANY EXISTING DRAINTILE IS ENCOUNTERED ON SITE. NOACTIVE DRAINTILE SHALL BE REMOVED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE ENGINEER.DEMOLITION PLAN NOTESNORTH LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTIONREMOVE BITUMINOUS SURFACEREMOVE CONCRETE SURFACEREMOVE BUILDINGREMOVE TREEREMOVE CONCRETE CURB & GUTTERREMOVE UTILITY LINESPROPERTY LINEEXISTING OVERHEAD POWER LINEEXISTING CHAINLINK FENCEEXISTING J-BARRIEREXISTING RETAINING WALLEXISTING SANITARY SEWEREXISTING STORM SEWEREXISTING WATERMAINEXISTING GAS MAINEXISTING UNDERGROUND TELEPHONEEXISTING UNDERGROUND CABLEEXISTING CONTOUREXISTING SIGNEXISTING FLARED END SECTIONEXISTING STORM MANHOLEEXISTING STORM CATCHBASINEXISTING GAS METEREXISTING POST INDICATOR VALVEEXISTING WELLEXISTING AUTOMATIC SPRINKLEREXISTING ROOF DRAINEXISTING GATE VALVEEXISTING HYDRANTEXISTING METAL COVEREXISTING ELECTRICAL METEREXISTING AIR CONDITIONEREXISTING TELEPHONE MANHOLEEXISTING CABLE BOXEXISTING GUY WIREEXISTING POWER POLEEXISTING LIGHT POLEEXISTING TREECLEARING & GRUBBINGFILL & ABANDON UTILITY LINESEXISTING CURB & GUTTERLEGENDFULL DEPTH SAWCUTREMOVE EXISTING BITUMINOUS SURFACEREMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE SURFACEREMOVE EXISTING BUILDINGREMOVE CLEARING AND GRUBBINGREMOVE EXISTING UTILITYPROTECT EXISTING UTILITYREMOVE EXISTING WETLANDREMOVE EXISTING TREEREMOVE EXISTING SIGNPROTECT EXISTING FIRE HYDRANTREMOVE EXISTING FIRE HYDRANTREMOVE EXISTING CURB AND GUTTERKEYNOTE LEGENDABCDEFGHIJKLC203 DEMOLITIONPLAN 1418920181818181817171881717161614141418181818181818920NO PARKINGNO PARKINGNO PARKING NO PARKINGNO PARKINGNO PARKINGNO PARKINGNO PARKINGNO PARKINGNO PARKINGN78°44'05" W 329.98 35 FT PARKING ANDBUILDING SETBACK10 FT PARKING SETBACK20 FT BUILDING SETBACK10 FT PARKING SETBACK20 FT BUILDING SETBACK35 FT PARKING AND BUILDING SETBACK10 FT PARKING SETBACK20 FT BUILDING SETBACKPROPOSEDBUILDING 1182,000 SFFFE: 889.00DOUGLAS DRIVEPROPOSEDBUILDING 2 217,000 SFFFE: 892.16COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE DOUGLAS DRIVEGOLDEN VALLEY GOLFRIGHT OF WAYCHICAGO NORTHWESTERN RAILROADRIGHT OF WAY20 FT TRANSMISSION LINE EASEMENT50 FT WIDE STREET ANDHIGHWAY EASEMENT14 FT WIDE TRAILEASEMENT35 FT PARKING ANDBUILDING SETBACKN0°24'11"E271.00'ADAADA ADA ADA ADAADA ADAADA ADA ADA ADA ADA ADAADAADAADA ADAADA ADAADAADAADASEE SHEET C304 -ADA ENLARGEMENT 1SEE SHEET C304 -ADA ENLARGEMENT 2SEE SHEET C304 -ADA ENLARGEMENT 4SEE SHEET C304 -ADA ENLARGEMENT 3PROPOSED LOT LINEN89°35'49"W 880.29'PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTERPROPERTY LINEPROPOSED FENCESETBACK LINERETAINING WALLPROPOSED STANDARD DUTY ASPHALTPROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENTPROPOSED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AREAPROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALKLEGENDPROPOSED HEAVY DUTY ASPHALTPROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:NOT FORCONSTRUCTION160576021ER/AN DDGOLDEN VALLEYBUSINESS CENTERGOLDEN VALLEYBUSINESS CENTERGOLDEN VALLEY, MNNo. Description Date 2021 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE: 651-645-4197 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM © This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.\\twcfp01\MW_TWC\TWC_LDEV\United_Properties\GOLDEN VALLEY INDUSTRIAL\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\C3-SITE PLAN.dwg September 23, 2021 - 8:27pm SITE PLAN NOTES1. ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL CITY/COUNTY REGULATIONSAND CODES AND O.S.H.A. STANDARDS.2. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACTLOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF VESTIBULES, SLOPE PAVING, SIDEWALKS, EXITPORCHES, TRUCK DOCKS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND EXACT BUILDINGUTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS.3. ALL INNER CURBED RADII ARE TO BE <3'> AND OUTER CURBED RADII ARE TO BE<10'> UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. STRIPED RADII ARE TO BE 5'.4. ALL DIMENSIONS AND RADII ARE TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISENOTED.5. EXISTING STRUCTURES WITHIN CONSTRUCTION LIMITS ARE TO BE ABANDONED,REMOVED OR RELOCATED AS NECESSARY. ALL COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASEBID.6. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL RELOCATIONS, (UNLESSOTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANS) INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ALL UTILITIES,STORM DRAINAGE, SIGNS, TRAFFIC SIGNALS & POLES, ETC. AS REQUIRED. ALLWORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNING AUTHORITIES REQUIREMENTSAND PROJECT SITE WORK SPECIFICATIONS AND SHALL BE APPROVED BY SUCH. ALLCOST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASE BID.7. SITE BOUNDARY, TOPOGRAPHY, UTILITY AND ROAD INFORMATION TAKEN FROM ASURVEY BY EGAN, FIELD & NOWAK, INC, DATED 08/18/2021.KIMLEY-HORN ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR ANY ERRORS, INACCURACIES, OROMISSIONS CONTAINED THEREIN.8. TOTAL LAND AREA IS <30.7> ACRES WITHOUT R.O.W. PURPOSES 28.03 ACRES.9. PYLON / MONUMENT SIGNS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED BY OTHERS. SIGNS ARESHOWN FOR GRAPHICAL & INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. CONTRACTOR TOVERIFY SIZE, LOCATION AND ANY REQUIRED PERMITS NECESSARY FOR THECONSTRUCTION OF THE PYLON / MONUMENT SIGN.10. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE ARCH / MEP PLANS FOR SITE LIGHTING ANDELECTRICAL PLAN.11. NO PROPOSED LANDSCAPING SUCH AS TREES OR SHRUBS, ABOVE ANDUNDERGROUND STRUCTURES, OR OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS SHALL BE LOCATEDWITHIN EXISTING OR PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY UNLESSSPECIFICALLY NOTED ON PLANS OTHERWISE.12. REFERENCE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DETAILS.13. REFER TO FINAL PLAT OR ALTA SURVEY FOR EXACT LOT AND PROPERTYBOUNDARY DIMENSIONS.14. ALL AREAS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST SQUARE FOOT.15. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST TENTH FOOT.16. ALL PARKING STALLS TO BE <9'> IN WIDTH AND <18.5'> IN LENGTH UNLESSOTHERWISE INDICATED.17. THERE ARE <0.97> ACRES OF WETLAND IMPACTS.18. FOR OFFSITE IMPROVEMENTS, SEE THE <OFFSITE PLANS> IMPROVEMENTS PLANS. NORTH SEE SHEETC301SEE SHEETC302PROPERTY SUMMARYGOLDEN VALLEY BUSINESS CENTERTOTAL PROPERTY AREA1,337,188 SF (30.70 AC)RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION116,260 SF (2.67 AC)NET PROPERTY AREA1,220,928 SF (28.03 AC)PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA959,817 SF (22.03 AC)PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA245,889 SF (5.64 AC)TOTAL DISTURBED AREA1,205,706 SF (27.7 AC)ZONING SUMMARYEXISTING ZONINGOFFICEPROPOSED ZONINGLIGHT INDUSTRIALPARKING SETBACKSSIDE/REAR = 10' ROAD = 35'BUILDING SETBACKSFRONT = 35' SIDE = 20'REAR = 20'C301 OVERALL SITEPLANKEYNOTE LEGENDCONCRETE SIDEWALK6" CONCRETE FILLED PIPE BOLLARDMATCH EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT/ CURB & GUTTERACCESSIBLE CURB RAMPACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGNACCESSIBLE PARKINGAREA STRIPED WITH 4" SYSL @ 45° 2' O.C.STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENTLANDSCAPE AREA - SEE LANDSCAPE PLANSHEAVY DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENTHEAVY DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENTB612 CURB & GUTTER (TYP.)TRANSITION CURBFLAT CURBCOMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY APRONCONCRETE RETAINING WALL- 12" WIDECONCRETE V-GUTTER- 24" WIDEABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQ 14171714141418181818181818920NO PARKINGNO PARKINGNO PARKINGNO PARKINGNO PARKING10 FT PARKING SETBACK20 FT BUILDING SETBACKIIIIJJJKCCIIIIIIIIIIIIIAAEEFAAIIAIR5.0'R5.0'R15.0'R15.0'50.0'59.0'42.5' 10.0' 700.0' 10.0' 61.0'61.0'12.0'260.0'60.0'60.0'20.0'40.0'20.0'145.1'24.0'24.0' 20.0'654.0'20.0'HHHH9.0'24.0' 24.0'R15.7531.5'120.0'KI24.0'31.5'20.0'654.0'20.0'31.5'24.0'R15.0'43.0'126.0'9.0'126.0'162.0'9.0'162.0'34.0'162.0'9.0'162.0' 24.0' 29.0'40.0'R5.0'R3.0'PROPOSEDBUILDING 1182,000 SFFFE: 889.00DOUGLAS DRIVEGOLDEN VALLEY GOLFRIGHT OF WAYCHICAGO NORTHWESTERN RAILROADRIGHT OF WAY DOUGLAS DRIVEGOLDEN VALLEY GOLFRIGHT OF WAYCHICAGO NORTHWESTERN RAILROADRIGHT OF WAYR39.0'AATYP.GFGF9.0'18.5'TYP.TYP.TYP.TYP.TYP.TYP.R15.0'ITYP.44.5'316.0'TYP.TYP.TYP.316.0'44.5'TYP.55.0'DDER5.0'R25.0'R25.0'R12.5'R5.0'R5.0'R25.0'R5.0'R25.0'R25.0'R5.0'R25.0'R5.0'R25.0'R5.0'R15.75R25.0'R12.5'R15.75R15.7543.0'N0°24'11"E271.00'R5.0'R15.0'TYP.R3.0'R3.0'R3.0'R3.0'R5.0'R5.0'R5.0'R3.0'R3.0'R3.0'R15.0'R5.0'R5.0'TYP.TYP.TYP.TYP.R5.0'TYP.R5.0'TYP.R3.0'R3.0'R3.0'R3.0'48.33'40.0'40.0'104.6'PQPQ16.6'96.8'181.3'TYP.25.0'29.5'PROPOSED R.O.W.PROPOSED R.O.W.PROPOSED R.O.W.GFDDGFGFFEEEEN89°35'49"W 880.29'R15.0'PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTERPROPERTY LINEPROPOSED FENCESETBACK LINERETAINING WALLPROPOSED STANDARD DUTY ASPHALTPROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENTPROPOSED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AREAPROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALKLEGENDPROPOSED HEAVY DUTY ASPHALTPROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:NOT FORCONSTRUCTION160576021ER/AN DDGOLDEN VALLEYBUSINESS CENTERGOLDEN VALLEYBUSINESS CENTERGOLDEN VALLEY, MNNo. Description Date 2021 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE: 651-645-4197 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.\\twcfp01\MW_TWC\TWC_LDEV\United_Properties\GOLDEN VALLEY INDUSTRIAL\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\C3-SITE PLAN.dwg September 23, 2021 - 8:27pm SITE PLAN NOTES1. ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL CITY/COUNTY REGULATIONSAND CODES AND O.S.H.A. STANDARDS.2. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACTLOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF VESTIBULES, SLOPE PAVING, SIDEWALKS, EXITPORCHES, TRUCK DOCKS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND EXACT BUILDINGUTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS.3. ALL INNER CURBED RADII ARE TO BE <3'> AND OUTER CURBED RADII ARE TO BE<10'> UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. STRIPED RADII ARE TO BE 5'.4. ALL DIMENSIONS AND RADII ARE TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISENOTED.5. EXISTING STRUCTURES WITHIN CONSTRUCTION LIMITS ARE TO BE ABANDONED,REMOVED OR RELOCATED AS NECESSARY. ALL COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASEBID.6. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL RELOCATIONS, (UNLESSOTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANS) INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ALL UTILITIES,STORM DRAINAGE, SIGNS, TRAFFIC SIGNALS & POLES, ETC. AS REQUIRED. ALLWORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNING AUTHORITIES REQUIREMENTSAND PROJECT SITE WORK SPECIFICATIONS AND SHALL BE APPROVED BY SUCH. ALLCOST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASE BID.7. SITE BOUNDARY, TOPOGRAPHY, UTILITY AND ROAD INFORMATION TAKEN FROM ASURVEY BY EGAN, FIELD & NOWAK, INC, DATED 08/18/2021.KIMLEY-HORN ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR ANY ERRORS, INACCURACIES, OROMISSIONS CONTAINED THEREIN.8. TOTAL LAND AREA IS <30.7> ACRES WITHOUT R.O.W. PURPOSES 28.03 ACRES.9. PYLON / MONUMENT SIGNS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED BY OTHERS. SIGNS ARESHOWN FOR GRAPHICAL & INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. CONTRACTOR TOVERIFY SIZE, LOCATION AND ANY REQUIRED PERMITS NECESSARY FOR THECONSTRUCTION OF THE PYLON / MONUMENT SIGN.10. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE ARCH / MEP PLANS FOR SITE LIGHTING ANDELECTRICAL PLAN.11. NO PROPOSED LANDSCAPING SUCH AS TREES OR SHRUBS, ABOVE ANDUNDERGROUND STRUCTURES, OR OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS SHALL BE LOCATEDWITHIN EXISTING OR PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY UNLESSSPECIFICALLY NOTED ON PLANS OTHERWISE.12. REFERENCE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DETAILS.13. REFER TO FINAL PLAT OR ALTA SURVEY FOR EXACT LOT AND PROPERTYBOUNDARY DIMENSIONS.14. ALL AREAS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST SQUARE FOOT.15. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST TENTH FOOT.16. ALL PARKING STALLS TO BE <9'> IN WIDTH AND <18.5'> IN LENGTH UNLESSOTHERWISE INDICATED.17. THERE ARE <0.97> ACRES OF WETLAND IMPACTS.18. FOR OFFSITE IMPROVEMENTS, SEE THE <OFFSITE PLANS> IMPROVEMENTS PLANS. NORTH BUILDING DATA SUMMARYAREASPROPOSED PROPERTY1,220,928 SF (28.03 AC)BUILDING AREA182,000 SF (14% OF TOTALPROPERTY AREA)PARKINGREQUIRED PARKING: OFFICE(20%) WAREHOUSE (80%)146 SPACES @ 1250 36,400 SF49 SPACES @ 13000 145,600 SFTOTAL= 195 SPACESPROPOSED PARKING211 SPACES @1.31 RATIOADA STALLS REQ'D / PROVIDED7 STALLS / 7 STALLSPROPERTY SUMMARYGOLDEN VALLEY BUSINESS CENTERTOTAL PROPERTY AREA1,337,188 SF (30.70 AC)RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION116,260 SF (2.67 AC)NET PROPERTY AREA1,220,928 SF (28.03 AC)PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA959,817 SF (22.03 AC)PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA245,889 SF (5.64 AC)TOTAL DISTURBED AREA1,205,706 SF (27.7 AC)ZONING SUMMARYEXISTING ZONINGOFFICEPROPOSED ZONINGLIGHT INDUSTRIALPARKING SETBACKSSIDE/REAR = 10'ROAD = 35'BUILDING SETBACKSFRONT = 35'SIDE = 20'REAR = 20'C302 SITE PLANKEYNOTE LEGENDCONCRETE SIDEWALK6" CONCRETE FILLED PIPE BOLLARDMATCH EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT/ CURB & GUTTERACCESSIBLE CURB RAMPACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGNACCESSIBLE PARKINGAREA STRIPED WITH 4" SYSL @ 45° 2' O.C.STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENTLANDSCAPE AREA - SEE LANDSCAPE PLANSHEAVY DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENTHEAVY DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENTB612 CURB & GUTTER (TYP.)TRANSITION CURBFLAT CURBCOMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY APRONCONCRETE RETAINING WALL- 12" WIDECONCRETE V-GUTTER- 24" WIDEABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQ 189201818181818171718817171616NO PARKINGNO PARKINGNO PARKING NO PARKINGNO PARKINGN78°44'05" W 329.98I IJJIII40.0'20.0'120.0'60.0'310.0'12.0'61.0'KHIIEEAAAAAAI50.0'35.0'5.0' 0.5' 61.0' 10.0'700.0'10.0' 61.0' 24.0'31.5'20.0'654.0'20.0'31.5'24.0'R15.0'R3.0'R15.0'GFDGFGFFDIIIIIII43.0'HHHHHILHILHILCCCCCCIIO30.0'CC162.0' 9.0' 162.0'34.0'162.0' 9.0' 162.0'153.0'9.0'144.0'29.0'40.0'COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE DOUGLAS DRIVEPROPOSEDBUILDING 2 217,000 SFFFE: 892.16COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE DOUGLAS DRIVETYP.R15.0'TYP.FFGFGII18.5'9.0'IR49.0'TYP.TYP.TYP.TYP.TYP.44.5'316.0'316.0'44.5'55.0'18.5'TYP.18.5'9.0'TYP. 18.5'9.0'TYP.TYP.DDEEEEER25.0'R25.0'R12.5'R25.0'R25.0'R25.0'R5.0'R25.0'R5.0'R25.0'R25.0'R12.5'R15.75R15.7543.0'48.33'R5.0'R5.0'R5.0'R5.0'R25.0'R49.0'TYP.R3.0'R3.0'R3.0'R3.0'R5.0'R5.0'R5.0'R5.0'R3.0'R3.0'R3.0'R3.0'R5.0'R5.0'R25.0'R5.0'TYP.R5.0'TYP.TYP.TYP.TYP.TYP.102.3'35.0'24.0'QPQPQP69.3'16.7'251.0'20.0' 291.1'35.0'25.0'29.5'PROPOSED R.O.W.PROPOSED R.O.W.N89°35'49"W880.29'PROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:NOT FORCONSTRUCTION160576021ER/AN DDGOLDEN VALLEYBUSINESS CENTERGOLDEN VALLEYBUSINESS CENTERGOLDEN VALLEY, MNNo. Description Date 2021 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE: 651-645-4197 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.\\twcfp01\MW_TWC\TWC_LDEV\United_Properties\GOLDEN VALLEY INDUSTRIAL\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\C3-SITE PLAN.dwg September 23, 2021 - 8:27pm BUILDING DATA SUMMARYAREASPROPOSED PROPERTY1,220,928 SF (28.03 AC)BUILDING AREA217,000 SF (17% OF TOTALPROPERTY AREA)PARKINGREQUIRED PARKING: OFFICE(20%) WAREHOUSE (80%)174 SPACES @ 1250 36,400 SF58 SPACES @ 13000 173,600 SFTOTAL= 232 SPACESPROPOSED PARKING263 SPACES @ 1.21 RATIOADA STALLS REQ'D / PROVIDED7 STALLS / 7 STALLSPROPOSED CURB AND GUTTERPROPERTY LINEPROPOSED FENCESETBACK LINERETAINING WALLPROPOSED STANDARD DUTY ASPHALTPROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENTPROPOSED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AREAPROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALKLEGENDPROPOSED HEAVY DUTY ASPHALTKEYNOTE LEGENDCONCRETE SIDEWALK6" CONCRETE FILLED PIPE BOLLARDMATCH EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT/ CURB & GUTTERACCESSIBLE CURB RAMPACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGNACCESSIBLE PARKINGAREA STRIPED WITH 4" SYSL @ 45° 2' O.C.STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENTLANDSCAPE AREA - SEE LANDSCAPE PLANSHEAVY DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENTHEAVY DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENTB612 CURB & GUTTER (TYP.)TRANSITION CURBFLAT CURBCOMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY APRONCONCRETE RETAINING WALL- 12" WIDECONCRETE V-GUTTER- 24" WIDEABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQSITE PLAN NOTES1. ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL CITY/COUNTY REGULATIONSAND CODES AND O.S.H.A. STANDARDS.2. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACTLOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF VESTIBULES, SLOPE PAVING, SIDEWALKS, EXITPORCHES, TRUCK DOCKS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND EXACT BUILDINGUTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS.3. ALL INNER CURBED RADII ARE TO BE <3'> AND OUTER CURBED RADII ARE TO BE<10'> UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. STRIPED RADII ARE TO BE 5'.4. ALL DIMENSIONS AND RADII ARE TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISENOTED.5. EXISTING STRUCTURES WITHIN CONSTRUCTION LIMITS ARE TO BE ABANDONED,REMOVED OR RELOCATED AS NECESSARY. ALL COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASEBID.6. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL RELOCATIONS, (UNLESSOTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANS) INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ALL UTILITIES,STORM DRAINAGE, SIGNS, TRAFFIC SIGNALS & POLES, ETC. AS REQUIRED. ALLWORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNING AUTHORITIES REQUIREMENTSAND PROJECT SITE WORK SPECIFICATIONS AND SHALL BE APPROVED BY SUCH. ALLCOST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASE BID.7. SITE BOUNDARY, TOPOGRAPHY, UTILITY AND ROAD INFORMATION TAKEN FROM ASURVEY BY EGAN, FIELD & NOWAK, INC, DATED 08/18/2021.KIMLEY-HORN ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR ANY ERRORS, INACCURACIES, OROMISSIONS CONTAINED THEREIN.8. TOTAL LAND AREA IS <30.7> ACRES WITHOUT R.O.W. PURPOSES 28.03 ACRES.9. PYLON / MONUMENT SIGNS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED BY OTHERS. SIGNS ARESHOWN FOR GRAPHICAL & INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. CONTRACTOR TOVERIFY SIZE, LOCATION AND ANY REQUIRED PERMITS NECESSARY FOR THECONSTRUCTION OF THE PYLON / MONUMENT SIGN.10. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE ARCH / MEP PLANS FOR SITE LIGHTING ANDELECTRICAL PLAN.11. NO PROPOSED LANDSCAPING SUCH AS TREES OR SHRUBS, ABOVE ANDUNDERGROUND STRUCTURES, OR OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS SHALL BE LOCATEDWITHIN EXISTING OR PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY UNLESSSPECIFICALLY NOTED ON PLANS OTHERWISE.12. REFERENCE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DETAILS.13. REFER TO FINAL PLAT OR ALTA SURVEY FOR EXACT LOT AND PROPERTYBOUNDARY DIMENSIONS.14. ALL AREAS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST SQUARE FOOT.15. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST TENTH FOOT.16. ALL PARKING STALLS TO BE <9'> IN WIDTH AND <18.5'> IN LENGTH UNLESSOTHERWISE INDICATED.17. THERE ARE <0.97> ACRES OF WETLAND IMPACTS.18. FOR OFFSITE IMPROVEMENTS, SEE THE <OFFSITE PLANS> IMPROVEMENTS PLANS. NORTH PROPERTY SUMMARYGOLDEN VALLEY BUSINESS CENTERTOTAL PROPERTY AREA1,337,188 SF (30.70 AC)RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION116,260 SF (2.67 AC)NET PROPERTY AREA1,220,928 SF (28.03 AC)PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA959,817 SF (22.03 AC)PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA245,889 SF (5.64 AC)TOTAL DISTURBED AREA1,205,706 SF (27.7 AC)ZONING SUMMARYEXISTING ZONINGOFFICEPROPOSED ZONINGLIGHT INDUSTRIALPARKING SETBACKSSIDE/REAR = 10'ROAD = 35'BUILDING SETBACKSFRONT = 35'SIDE = 20'REAR = 20'C303 SITE PLAN NO PARKINGNO PARKINGNO PARKING R3.0'GFDGFGFFDEEEE9.0'9.0'9.0'9.0'9.0'9.0'9.0'AAADAADAADAADAADAADAADAADAADA ADA ADA ADA ADA ADA ADA ADA ADA ADA ADA ADA ADA ADA ADA ADA ADA ADA ADA ADA ADAADAADAADAADAADA ADA ADA ADAMNNM12.0'NO PARKINGNO PARKINGNO PARKINGGFDDGFGFFEEEE9.0'9.0'9.0'9.0'9.0'9.0'9.0'12.0'9.5'ANNMAMADAADAADAADAADAADAADAADAADA ADA ADA ADA ADA ADA ADA ADA ADA ADA ADA ADA ADA ADA ADA ADA ADA ADA ADA ADA ADAADAADAADAADAADA ADA ADA ADA12.0'NO PARKINGNO PARKINGEEFAGFGFDDE9.0'9.0'9.0'9.0'9.0'10.0'MNNADAADAADAADAADAADAADAADAADAADAADAADAADAADAADAADAADAADAADAADAADAADAADAADAADAADAADAADAADAADAADAADAADAADA MNO PARKINGNO PARKINGEEFFGFGDDE9.0'9.0'9.0'9.0'9.0'10.0'NNMADAADAADAADAADAADAADAADAADAADAADAADAADAADAADAADAADAADAADAADAADAADAADAADAADAADAADAADAADA ADAADAADAMPROPOSED CURB AND GUTTERPROPERTY LINEPROPOSED FENCESETBACK LINERETAINING WALLPROPOSED STANDARD DUTY ASPHALTPROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENTPROPOSED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AREAPROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALKLEGENDPROPOSED HEAVY DUTY ASPHALTPROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:NOT FORCONSTRUCTION160576021ER/AN DDGOLDEN VALLEYBUSINESS CENTERGOLDEN VALLEYBUSINESS CENTERGOLDEN VALLEY, MNNo. Description Date 2021 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE: 651-645-4197 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.K:\TWC_LDEV\United_Properties\GOLDEN VALLEY INDUSTRIAL\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\C3-SITE PLAN.dwg September 23, 2021 - 8:28pm SITE PLAN NOTES1. ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL CITY/COUNTY REGULATIONSAND CODES AND O.S.H.A. STANDARDS.2. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACTLOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF VESTIBULES, SLOPE PAVING, SIDEWALKS, EXITPORCHES, TRUCK DOCKS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND EXACT BUILDINGUTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS.3. ALL INNER CURBED RADII ARE TO BE <3'> AND OUTER CURBED RADII ARE TO BE<10'> UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. STRIPED RADII ARE TO BE 5'.4. ALL DIMENSIONS AND RADII ARE TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISENOTED.5. EXISTING STRUCTURES WITHIN CONSTRUCTION LIMITS ARE TO BE ABANDONED,REMOVED OR RELOCATED AS NECESSARY. ALL COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASEBID.6. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL RELOCATIONS, (UNLESSOTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANS) INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ALL UTILITIES,STORM DRAINAGE, SIGNS, TRAFFIC SIGNALS & POLES, ETC. AS REQUIRED. ALLWORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNING AUTHORITIES REQUIREMENTSAND PROJECT SITE WORK SPECIFICATIONS AND SHALL BE APPROVED BY SUCH. ALLCOST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASE BID.7. SITE BOUNDARY, TOPOGRAPHY, UTILITY AND ROAD INFORMATION TAKEN FROM ASURVEY BY EGAN, FIELD & NOWAK, INC, DATED 08/18/2021.KIMLEY-HORN ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR ANY ERRORS, INACCURACIES, OROMISSIONS CONTAINED THEREIN.8. TOTAL LAND AREA IS <30.7> ACRES WITHOUT R.O.W. PURPOSES 28.03 ACRES.9. PYLON / MONUMENT SIGNS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED BY OTHERS. SIGNS ARESHOWN FOR GRAPHICAL & INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. CONTRACTOR TOVERIFY SIZE, LOCATION AND ANY REQUIRED PERMITS NECESSARY FOR THECONSTRUCTION OF THE PYLON / MONUMENT SIGN.10. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE ARCH / MEP PLANS FOR SITE LIGHTING ANDELECTRICAL PLAN.11. NO PROPOSED LANDSCAPING SUCH AS TREES OR SHRUBS, ABOVE ANDUNDERGROUND STRUCTURES, OR OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS SHALL BE LOCATEDWITHIN EXISTING OR PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY UNLESSSPECIFICALLY NOTED ON PLANS OTHERWISE.12. REFERENCE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DETAILS.13. REFER TO FINAL PLAT OR ALTA SURVEY FOR EXACT LOT AND PROPERTYBOUNDARY DIMENSIONS.14. ALL AREAS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST SQUARE FOOT.15. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST TENTH FOOT.16. ALL PARKING STALLS TO BE <9'> IN WIDTH AND <18.5'> IN LENGTH UNLESSOTHERWISE INDICATED.17. THERE ARE <0.97> ACRES OF WETLAND IMPACTS.18. FOR OFFSITE IMPROVEMENTS, SEE THE <OFFSITE PLANS> IMPROVEMENTS PLANS. NORTH C304 SITE PLAN ADAENLARGEMENTSKEYNOTE LEGENDCONCRETE SIDEWALK6" CONCRETE FILLED PIPE BOLLARDMATCH EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT/ CURB & GUTTERACCESSIBLE CURB RAMPACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGNACCESSIBLE PARKINGAREA STRIPED WITH 4" SYSL @ 45° 2' O.C.STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENTLANDSCAPE AREA - SEE LANDSCAPE PLANSHEAVY DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENTHEAVY DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENTB612 CURB & GUTTER (TYP.)TRANSITION CURBFLAT CURBCOMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY APRONCONCRETE RETAINING WALL- 12" WIDECONCRETE V-GUTTER- 24" WIDEABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQSCALE 1"=10'ADA ENLARGEMENT4SCALE 1"=10'ADA ENLARGEMENT1SCALE 1"=10'ADA ENLARGEMENT2SCALE 1"=10'ADA ENLARGEMENT3 1418920PROPOSEDBUILDING 2 217,000 SFFFE: 892.16PROPOSEDBUILDING 1182,000 SFFFE: 889.00COUNTRY C L U B D R I V E DOUGLAS DRIVE(COUNTY ROAD 102)GOLDEN VALLEY GOLFRIGHT OF WAY181818181817171881717161614141418181818181818920CHICAGO NORTHWESTERN RAILROADRIGHT OF WAY NO PARKINGNO PARKINGNO PARKING NO PARKINGNO PARKINGNO PARKINGNO PARKINGNO PARKINGNO PARKINGNO PARKINGDDDD D D D875880880885875880885 885 883 884 886 887 88 5 883 884 886 887 885 883 884 886 887885885883 884886887887888 887888 887888 887888 887 8808858908 8 6 8878 8 8 8 8 9 891895 900 905915 885890895 900883884886887888889891892 893 894 896897898 899901 902 903 880880 881881882 90 5910 90490 6 90 7 90 8 9 0 9 9 1 1 9 1 2 9 1 3 900 905 898 899 901 902903904 90690 7908890891890895887888889891892893894900896897898899901880880885876876877877878878878878879879881881882882883883884884 886 891891891891885890895875880885 875880885 905895 900 905 884 884 884 884 PROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:NOT FORCONSTRUCTION160576021ER/AN DDGOLDEN VALLEYBUSINESS CENTERGOLDEN VALLEYBUSINESS CENTERGOLDEN VALLEY, MNNo. Description Date 2021 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE: 651-645-4197 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM © This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.\\twcfp01\MW_TWC\TWC_LDEV\United_Properties\GOLDEN VALLEY INDUSTRIAL\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\C4-GRADING PLAN.dwg September 23, 2021 - 8:29pm NORTH GRADING PLAN NOTES1. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF XXXXXXX,SPECIFICATIONS AND BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS.2. CONTRACTOR TO CALL GOPHER STATE CALL ONE @ <1-800-252-1166> AT LEAST TWOWORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS.3. STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:RCP PER ASTM C-76HDPE: 0" - 10" PER AASHTO M-252HDPE: 12" OR GREATER PER ASTM F-2306PVC SCH. 40 PER ASTM D-1785STORM SEWER FITTINGS SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:RCP PER ASTM C-76, JOINTS PER ASTM C-361, C-990, AND C-443HDPE PER ASTM 3212PVC PER ASTM D-3034, JOINTS PER ASTM D-32124. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OR EXISTINGUTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO THE START OF SITE GRADING. THECONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER OF ANYDISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS.5. SUBGRADE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER EXCAVATION TOHELP OFFSET ANY STABILITY PROBLEMS DUE TO WATER SEEPAGE OR STEEP SLOPES.WHEN PLACING NEW SURFACE MATERIAL ADJACENT TO EXISTING PAVEMENT, THEEXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED PROMPTLY TO AVOID UNDERMINING OF EXISTINGPAVEMENT.6. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROL.7. CONTRACTOR SHALL EXCAVATE DRAINAGE TRENCHES TO FOLLOW PROPOSED STORMSEWER ALIGNMENTS.8. GRADES SHOWN ARE FINISHED GRADES. CONTRACTOR SHALL ROUGH GRADE TOSUBGRADE ELEVATION AND LEAVE STREET READY FOR SUBBASE.9. ALL EXCESS MATERIAL, BITUMINOUS SURFACING, CONCRETE ITEMS, ANY ABANDONEDUTILITY ITEMS, AND OTHER UNSTABLE MATERIALS SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OFTHE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE.10. REFER TO THE UTILITY PLAN FOR SANITARY SEWER MAIN, WATER MAIN SERVICELAYOUT AND ELEVATIONS AND CASTING / STRUCTURE NOTATION.11. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PAVEMENTS AND CURB ANDGUTTER WITH SMOOTH UNIFORM SLOPES TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE.12. INSTALL A MINIMUM OF <4" CLASS 5> AGGREGATE BASE UNDER CURB AND GUTTER ANDCONCRETE SIDEWALKS.13. UPON COMPLETION OF EXCAVATION AND FILLING, CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALLSTREETS AND DISTURBED AREAS ON SITE. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BERE-VEGETATED WITH A MINIMUM OF <4" OF TOPSOIL>.14. ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS/CONTOURS ARE TO GUTTER / FLOW LINE UNLESS OTHERWISENOTED.15. GRADING FOR ALL SIDEWALKS AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES INCLUDING CROSSINGDRIVEWAYS SHALL CONFORM TO CURRENT ADA STATE/NATIONAL STANDARDS. IN NOCASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE RAMP SLOPES EXCEED 1 VERTICAL TO 12 HORIZONTAL. IN NOCASE SHALL SIDEWALK CROSS SLOPES EXCEED 2% . IN NO CASE SHALL LONGITUDINALSIDEWALK SLOPES EXCEED 5%. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS ORAISLES EXCEED 2% (1.5% TARGET) IN ALL DIRECTIONS. SIDEWALK ACCESS TO EXTERNALBUILDING DOORS AND GATES SHALL BE ADA COMPLIANT. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFYENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF ADA CRITERIA CANNOT BE MET IN ANY LOCATION PRIOR TOPAVING. NO CONTRACTOR CHANGE ORDERS WILL BE ACCEPTED FOR A.D.A COMPLIANCEISSUES.16. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 0.5% GUTTER SLOPE TOWARDS LOW POINTS.17. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE 3" INSULATION BY 5' WIDE CENTERED ON STORM PIPE IFLESS THAN 4' OF COVER IN PAVEMENT AREAS AND LESS THAN 3' OF COVER INLANDSCAPE AREAS.18. ROOF DRAIN INVERT CONNECTIONS AT THE BUILDING SHALL BE AT ELEVATION <XXX.XX>OR LOWER UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. REFERENCE MEP PLANS FOR ROOF DRAINCONNECTION.19. ALL STORM SEWER CONNECTIONS SHALL BE GASKETED AND WATER TIGHT INCLUDINGMANHOLE CONNECTIONS.20. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AIR TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENTPLUMBING CODE.21. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 1.25% SLOPE IN BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT AREAS, 0.5% SLOPE INCONCRETE PAVEMENT AREAS.22. CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW PAVEMENT GRADIENT AND CONSTRUCT "INFALL CURB"WHERE PAVEMENT DRAINS TOWARD GUTTER, AND "OUTFALL" CURB WHERE PAVEMENTDRAINS AWAY FROM GUTTER.PROPOSED STORM SEWERPROPOSED STORM SEWERPROPERTY LINEEXISTING CONTOURPROPOSED CONTOUR925PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION100.00LEGENDPROPOSED HIGH POINT ELEVATION HP:0.0PROPOSED LOW POINT ELEVATION PROPOSED GUTTER ELEVATION PROPOSED TOP OF CURB ELEVATION PROPOSED FLUSH PAVEMENT ELEVATION LP:0.0G:0.00T:0.00PROPOSED EMERGENCY OVERFLOW T/G:0.0EOF:0.00.0%PROPOSED DRAINAGE DIRECTION 0.00%PROPOSED ADA SLOPE ME:0.0MATCH EXISTING ELEVATION PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (SOLID CASTING)PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (ROUND INLET CASTING)PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE/ CATCH BASIN (CURB INLET CASTING)PROPOSED STORM SEWER CLENOUTPROPOSED RIPRAPPROPOSED FLARED END SECTIONCODC400GRADING PLAN 14PROPOSEDBUILDING 1182,000 SFFFE: 889.00DOUGLAS DRIVE(COUNTY ROAD 102)GOLDEN VALLEY GOLF171714141418181818181818920CHICAGO NORTHWESTERN RAILROADRIGHT OF WAY NO PARKINGNO PARKINGNO PARKINGNO PARKINGNO PARKINGD D D1.27%1.25%1.56%1.36%1.58% 1.60% 2.66% 2.12% 1.22%1.18% 1.03% 1.23%1.30%2.39%2.86%1.20% 1.20%1.17% 3.17%4.82%3.24%1.01%1.00%7.67%1.20%5.09%1.00%1.00%2.00%7.67%875 880 880 885 875 880 885 885 883 884 88 5 883 884 885 883 884 885885883 884886887887888 887 888 887 888 887 888 887 880885880 8 8 0 8818 8 1 8 8 2 890895887888889891892893894900896897898899901880 880885876876877877878878878878879879881 881 882882 883883884 884 885890895875 880 885 875 880 885 884 884 884 8841.00%3.78%882.66882.18882.28885.29885.39884.88884.88885.13885.28885.29885.28885.13884.88884.88884.48884.40884.40884.36884.11885.20885.42885.41888.18888.24888.40888.40888.15888.13888.40887.89887.89884.70886.91880.62880.14880.22881.59888.18888.06888.06888.28887.97888.28887.77887.71887.55888.28888.06888.12888.06888.12888.28888.28888.12888.06888.06HP:888.24888.18888.24888.40888.40888.24HP:888.18885.54885.33884.11884.36884.40889.00885.40884.40889.00889.00885.40883.68883.83884.08883.81884.06883.66883.68883.84884.08884.06883.83883.66887.67887.83HP:887.89887.67887.83887.89HP:888.24887.77887.95887.55887.55887.55LP:882.84883.68LP:882.84LP:883.32HP:884.08LP:883.32LP:882.85HP:883.68LP:882.83LP:883.32HP:884.08LP:883.32HP:885.28LP:884.49LP:884.50LP:884.49HP:885.28LP:884.49LP:886.36888.40LP:886.72HP:887.55LP:886.72LP:886.72HP:887.55HP:887.55LP:887.56HP:887.89LP:887.56884.40LP:883.99884.40884.40887.77888.05888.05888.04888.02888.01888.28888.28888.28888.28888.28888.28887.99887.77887.71887.71887.77886.16889.00881.95G:895.16G:895.84G:891.57888.14887.89890.50894.62LP:887.13LP:887.13PROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:NOT FORCONSTRUCTION160576021ER/AN DDGOLDEN VALLEYBUSINESS CENTERGOLDEN VALLEYBUSINESS CENTERGOLDEN VALLEY, MNNo. Description Date 2021 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE: 651-645-4197 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM © This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.\\twcfp01\MW_TWC\TWC_LDEV\United_Properties\GOLDEN VALLEY INDUSTRIAL\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\C4-GRADING PLAN.dwg September 23, 2021 - 8:29pm 0.0%PROPOSED DRAINAGE DIRECTION 0.00%PROPOSED ADA SLOPE NORTH GRADING PLAN NOTES1. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF XXXXXXX,SPECIFICATIONS AND BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS.2. CONTRACTOR TO CALL GOPHER STATE CALL ONE @ <1-800-252-1166> AT LEAST TWOWORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS.3. STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:RCP PER ASTM C-76HDPE: 0" - 10" PER AASHTO M-252HDPE: 12" OR GREATER PER ASTM F-2306PVC SCH. 40 PER ASTM D-1785STORM SEWER FITTINGS SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:RCP PER ASTM C-76, JOINTS PER ASTM C-361, C-990, AND C-443HDPE PER ASTM 3212PVC PER ASTM D-3034, JOINTS PER ASTM D-32124. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OR EXISTINGUTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO THE START OF SITE GRADING. THECONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER OF ANYDISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS.5. SUBGRADE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER EXCAVATION TOHELP OFFSET ANY STABILITY PROBLEMS DUE TO WATER SEEPAGE OR STEEP SLOPES.WHEN PLACING NEW SURFACE MATERIAL ADJACENT TO EXISTING PAVEMENT, THEEXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED PROMPTLY TO AVOID UNDERMINING OF EXISTINGPAVEMENT.6. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROL.7. CONTRACTOR SHALL EXCAVATE DRAINAGE TRENCHES TO FOLLOW PROPOSED STORMSEWER ALIGNMENTS.8. GRADES SHOWN ARE FINISHED GRADES. CONTRACTOR SHALL ROUGH GRADE TOSUBGRADE ELEVATION AND LEAVE STREET READY FOR SUBBASE.9. ALL EXCESS MATERIAL, BITUMINOUS SURFACING, CONCRETE ITEMS, ANY ABANDONEDUTILITY ITEMS, AND OTHER UNSTABLE MATERIALS SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OFTHE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE.10. REFER TO THE UTILITY PLAN FOR SANITARY SEWER MAIN, WATER MAIN SERVICELAYOUT AND ELEVATIONS AND CASTING / STRUCTURE NOTATION.11. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PAVEMENTS AND CURB ANDGUTTER WITH SMOOTH UNIFORM SLOPES TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE.12. INSTALL A MINIMUM OF <4" CLASS 5> AGGREGATE BASE UNDER CURB AND GUTTER ANDCONCRETE SIDEWALKS.13. UPON COMPLETION OF EXCAVATION AND FILLING, CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALLSTREETS AND DISTURBED AREAS ON SITE. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BERE-VEGETATED WITH A MINIMUM OF <4" OF TOPSOIL>.14. ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS/CONTOURS ARE TO GUTTER / FLOW LINE UNLESS OTHERWISENOTED.15. GRADING FOR ALL SIDEWALKS AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES INCLUDING CROSSINGDRIVEWAYS SHALL CONFORM TO CURRENT ADA STATE/NATIONAL STANDARDS. IN NOCASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE RAMP SLOPES EXCEED 1 VERTICAL TO 12 HORIZONTAL. IN NOCASE SHALL SIDEWALK CROSS SLOPES EXCEED 2% . IN NO CASE SHALL LONGITUDINALSIDEWALK SLOPES EXCEED 5%. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS ORAISLES EXCEED 2% (1.5% TARGET) IN ALL DIRECTIONS. SIDEWALK ACCESS TO EXTERNALBUILDING DOORS AND GATES SHALL BE ADA COMPLIANT. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFYENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF ADA CRITERIA CANNOT BE MET IN ANY LOCATION PRIOR TOPAVING. NO CONTRACTOR CHANGE ORDERS WILL BE ACCEPTED FOR A.D.A COMPLIANCEISSUES.16. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 0.5% GUTTER SLOPE TOWARDS LOW POINTS.17. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE 3" INSULATION BY 5' WIDE CENTERED ON STORM PIPE IFLESS THAN 4' OF COVER IN PAVEMENT AREAS AND LESS THAN 3' OF COVER INLANDSCAPE AREAS.18. ROOF DRAIN INVERT CONNECTIONS AT THE BUILDING SHALL BE AT ELEVATION <XXX.XX>OR LOWER UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. REFERENCE MEP PLANS FOR ROOF DRAINCONNECTION.19. ALL STORM SEWER CONNECTIONS SHALL BE GASKETED AND WATER TIGHT INCLUDINGMANHOLE CONNECTIONS.20. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AIR TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENTPLUMBING CODE.21. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 1.25% SLOPE IN BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT AREAS, 0.5% SLOPE INCONCRETE PAVEMENT AREAS.22. CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW PAVEMENT GRADIENT AND CONSTRUCT "INFALL CURB"WHERE PAVEMENT DRAINS TOWARD GUTTER, AND "OUTFALL" CURB WHERE PAVEMENTDRAINS AWAY FROM GUTTER.PROPOSED STORM SEWERPROPOSED STORM SEWERPROPERTY LINEEXISTING CONTOURPROPOSED CONTOUR925PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION100.00LEGENDPROPOSED HIGH POINT ELEVATION HP:0.0PROPOSED LOW POINT ELEVATION PROPOSED GUTTER ELEVATION PROPOSED TOP OF CURB ELEVATION PROPOSED FLUSH PAVEMENT ELEVATION LP:0.0G:0.00T:0.00PROPOSED EMERGENCY OVERFLOW T/G:0.0EOF:0.0ME:0.0MATCH EXISTING ELEVATION PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (SOLID CASTING)PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (ROUND INLET CASTING)PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE/ CATCH BASIN (CURB INLET CASTING)PROPOSED STORM SEWER CLENOUTPROPOSED RIPRAPPROPOSED FLARED END SECTIONCODC401GRADING PLAN 18920PROPOSEDBUILDING 2 217,000 SFFFE: 892.16COUNTRY C L U B D R I V E DOUGLAS DRIVE(COUNTY ROAD 102)GOLDEN VALLEY GOLF1818181818171718817171616NO PARKINGNO PARKINGNO PARKING NO PARKINGNO PARKINGDDDD D2.00%1.00%1.00%1.18% 1.18%1.74%1.78%1.67%1.53% 1.29%7.71%7.47%1.05%1.05%885 883884886887885883884886887885883884886887885885883884 8908 8 6 8878 8 8 8 8 9 891895 900 905915 885890895 900883884886887888889891892 893 894 896897898 899901 902 90390 5 91090490 6 90 7 90 8 9 0 9 9 1 1 9 1 2 9 1 3 900 90 5 898 899 901 902 903 904 90 6 907 908890891886 891891891891885890905 895 900 9058.48%1.54% 1.54% 1.54%887.69887.53887.53892.16892.16887.33887.61891.56891.34891.40891.56891.24891.34891.56890.99891.05890.83HP:890.96890.89890.73891.22891.46891.46891.17HP:891.21891.46891.46891.46HP:891.24890.83888.38888.41887.75886.42885.38889.63882.66882.18882.28886.17886.19886.18885.29885.39884.88884.88885.13885.28885.29885.28885.13884.88884.88884.48885.67886.18887.33887.61887.61887.45HP:891.34891.56HP:891.05890.83890.99891.40891.56891.56890.91890.08891.07891.56891.34891.05890.83890.95890.89890.73HP:890.95890.73890.73884.08884.06884.08884.06LP:883.32HP:884.08LP:883.32LP:883.32HP:884.08LP:883.32HP:885.28LP:884.49LP:884.50LP:884.49HP:885.28LP:884.49LP:890.38HP:890.83LP:890.38LP:890.15HP:890.73LP:889.90LP:889.90890.73LP:889.90LP:889.30887.53885.53887.53887.53HP:891.21891.46HP:890.88891.46891.02HP:891.24891.38892.16892.16887.69887.21887.70891.46HP:890.88891.46881.95G:892.33G:911.91G:907.44905.14907.41892.00905.13892.55904.27889.83892.89905.43891.16PROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:NOT FORCONSTRUCTION160576021ER/AN DDGOLDEN VALLEYBUSINESS CENTERGOLDEN VALLEYBUSINESS CENTERGOLDEN VALLEY, MNNo. Description Date 2021 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE: 651-645-4197 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM © This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.\\twcfp01\MW_TWC\TWC_LDEV\United_Properties\GOLDEN VALLEY INDUSTRIAL\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\C4-GRADING PLAN.dwg September 23, 2021 - 8:29pm 0.0%PROPOSED DRAINAGE DIRECTION 0.00%PROPOSED ADA SLOPE NORTH GRADING PLAN NOTES1. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF XXXXXXX,SPECIFICATIONS AND BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS.2. CONTRACTOR TO CALL GOPHER STATE CALL ONE @ <1-800-252-1166> AT LEAST TWOWORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS.3. STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:RCP PER ASTM C-76HDPE: 0" - 10" PER AASHTO M-252HDPE: 12" OR GREATER PER ASTM F-2306PVC SCH. 40 PER ASTM D-1785STORM SEWER FITTINGS SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:RCP PER ASTM C-76, JOINTS PER ASTM C-361, C-990, AND C-443HDPE PER ASTM 3212PVC PER ASTM D-3034, JOINTS PER ASTM D-32124. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OR EXISTINGUTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO THE START OF SITE GRADING. THECONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER OF ANYDISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS.5. SUBGRADE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER EXCAVATION TOHELP OFFSET ANY STABILITY PROBLEMS DUE TO WATER SEEPAGE OR STEEP SLOPES.WHEN PLACING NEW SURFACE MATERIAL ADJACENT TO EXISTING PAVEMENT, THEEXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED PROMPTLY TO AVOID UNDERMINING OF EXISTINGPAVEMENT.6. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROL.7. CONTRACTOR SHALL EXCAVATE DRAINAGE TRENCHES TO FOLLOW PROPOSED STORMSEWER ALIGNMENTS.8. GRADES SHOWN ARE FINISHED GRADES. CONTRACTOR SHALL ROUGH GRADE TOSUBGRADE ELEVATION AND LEAVE STREET READY FOR SUBBASE.9. ALL EXCESS MATERIAL, BITUMINOUS SURFACING, CONCRETE ITEMS, ANY ABANDONEDUTILITY ITEMS, AND OTHER UNSTABLE MATERIALS SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OFTHE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE.10. REFER TO THE UTILITY PLAN FOR SANITARY SEWER MAIN, WATER MAIN SERVICELAYOUT AND ELEVATIONS AND CASTING / STRUCTURE NOTATION.11. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PAVEMENTS AND CURB ANDGUTTER WITH SMOOTH UNIFORM SLOPES TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE.12. INSTALL A MINIMUM OF <4" CLASS 5> AGGREGATE BASE UNDER CURB AND GUTTER ANDCONCRETE SIDEWALKS.13. UPON COMPLETION OF EXCAVATION AND FILLING, CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALLSTREETS AND DISTURBED AREAS ON SITE. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BERE-VEGETATED WITH A MINIMUM OF <4" OF TOPSOIL>.14. ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS/CONTOURS ARE TO GUTTER / FLOW LINE UNLESS OTHERWISENOTED.15. GRADING FOR ALL SIDEWALKS AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES INCLUDING CROSSINGDRIVEWAYS SHALL CONFORM TO CURRENT ADA STATE/NATIONAL STANDARDS. IN NOCASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE RAMP SLOPES EXCEED 1 VERTICAL TO 12 HORIZONTAL. IN NOCASE SHALL SIDEWALK CROSS SLOPES EXCEED 2% . IN NO CASE SHALL LONGITUDINALSIDEWALK SLOPES EXCEED 5%. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS ORAISLES EXCEED 2% (1.5% TARGET) IN ALL DIRECTIONS. SIDEWALK ACCESS TO EXTERNALBUILDING DOORS AND GATES SHALL BE ADA COMPLIANT. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFYENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF ADA CRITERIA CANNOT BE MET IN ANY LOCATION PRIOR TOPAVING. NO CONTRACTOR CHANGE ORDERS WILL BE ACCEPTED FOR A.D.A COMPLIANCEISSUES.16. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 0.5% GUTTER SLOPE TOWARDS LOW POINTS.17. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE 3" INSULATION BY 5' WIDE CENTERED ON STORM PIPE IFLESS THAN 4' OF COVER IN PAVEMENT AREAS AND LESS THAN 3' OF COVER INLANDSCAPE AREAS.18. ROOF DRAIN INVERT CONNECTIONS AT THE BUILDING SHALL BE AT ELEVATION <XXX.XX>OR LOWER UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. REFERENCE MEP PLANS FOR ROOF DRAINCONNECTION.19. ALL STORM SEWER CONNECTIONS SHALL BE GASKETED AND WATER TIGHT INCLUDINGMANHOLE CONNECTIONS.20. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AIR TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENTPLUMBING CODE.21. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 1.25% SLOPE IN BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT AREAS, 0.5% SLOPE INCONCRETE PAVEMENT AREAS.22. CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW PAVEMENT GRADIENT AND CONSTRUCT "INFALL CURB"WHERE PAVEMENT DRAINS TOWARD GUTTER, AND "OUTFALL" CURB WHERE PAVEMENTDRAINS AWAY FROM GUTTER.PROPOSED STORM SEWERPROPOSED STORM SEWERPROPERTY LINEEXISTING CONTOURPROPOSED CONTOUR925PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION100.00LEGENDPROPOSED HIGH POINT ELEVATION HP:0.0PROPOSED LOW POINT ELEVATION PROPOSED GUTTER ELEVATION PROPOSED TOP OF CURB ELEVATION PROPOSED FLUSH PAVEMENT ELEVATION LP:0.0G:0.00T:0.00PROPOSED EMERGENCY OVERFLOW T/G:0.0EOF:0.0ME:0.0MATCH EXISTING ELEVATION PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (SOLID CASTING)PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (ROUND INLET CASTING)PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE/ CATCH BASIN (CURB INLET CASTING)PROPOSED STORM SEWER CLENOUTPROPOSED RIPRAPPROPOSED FLARED END SECTIONCODC402GRADING PLAN DDD DD D DPROPOSEDBUILDING 2 217,000 SFFFE: 892.16PROPOSEDBUILDING 1182,000 SFFFE: 889.00COUNTRY C L U B D R I V E DOUGLAS DRIVE(COUNTY ROAD 102)GOLDEN VALLEY GOLFRIGHT OF WAYCHICAGO NORTHWESTERN RAILROADRIGHT OF WAY NO PARKINGNO PARKINGNO PARKING NO PARKINGNO PARKINGNO PARKINGNO PARKINGNO PARKINGNO PARKINGNO PARKING20+00 21+0022+0023+0024+0025+0026+0027+0028+0029+0030+0031+0032+0033+0034+0010+0011+0012+0013+0014+0015+0016+0017+0018+0019+0020+0021+0022+00 23+00 24+00 30+0031+0032+0033+0034+0035+0036+0037+00 DD DDDD DST-58RE:886.72IE:883.72 NST-57RE:880.65IE:879.00 SST-56RE:886.72IE:883.72 NST-55RE:879.90IE:879.00 SST-54RE:886.72IE:883.72 NST-53RE:880.65IE:879.00 SST-52RE:887.13IE:884.13 NST-51RE:880.65IE:879.00 SST-4STA: 21+25.72, 0.00'RE:892.18IE:883.94 EIE:883.84 NST-5STA: 24+08.75, 0.00'RE:890.60IE:886.10 SIE:885.60 WST-11STA: 34+15.42, 0.00'RE:890.60IE:886.10 SIE:885.60 EST-10STA: 31+30.72, 0.00'RE:892.31IE:883.94 WIE:883.84 NST-9STA: 25+32.72, 0.00'RE:883.33IE:877.86 SIE:877.86 WIE:877.76 NST-3STA: 15+27.72, 0.00'RE:883.76IE:877.86 SIE:877.84 EIE:878.49 WIE:877.74 NST-15RE:883.10IE:880.36 SIE:879.86 WIE:880.36 NST-16STA: 27+82.72, 34.99' RIE:880.56 EST-19RE:883.08IE:880.36 SIE:881.11 EIE:880.36 NST-18STA: 17+77.72, 34.00' LIE:880.43 WST-2RE:878.51IE:875.79 SIE:876.54 EIE:875.79 NST-17STA: 11+37.72, 34.00' LIE:877.22 WST-14STA: 21+32.72, 18.83' RIE:876.89 EST-1STA: 10+00, 0.00'RE:877.67IE:875.00 SST-7STA: 20+00, 0.00'RE:877.67IE:875.00 SST-23STA: 20+91.03, 0.00'RE:886.62IE:875.56 SIE:875.46 NST-22RE:877.25IE:874.40 SST-21RE:878.42IE:875.00 NST-24STA: 10+91.65, 0.00'RE:888.06IE:875.56 SIE:875.46 N92 LF - 30" HDPE@ 0.50%120 LF - 30" HDPE@ 0.50%250 LF - 30" HDPE@ 1.00%118 LF - 24" HDPE @ 0.59%91 LF - 30" HDPE@ 0.50%65 LF - 30" HDPE@ 0.50%250 LF - 30" HDPE@ 1.00%118 LF - 24" HDPE @ 0.58% 107 LF - 24" HDPE @ 0.50%19 LF - 12" PVC@ -2.00%165 LF - 30" HDPE@ 1.00%35 LF - 12" PVC@ 2.00%34 LF - 12" PVC@ 2.00%148 LF - 30" HDPE@ 1.00%34 LF - 12" PVC@ -2.00%81 LF - 36" RCP@ 0.74%46 LF - 30" HDPE@ 0.50%42 LF - 30" HDPE@ 0.50%39 LF - 18" HDPE@ 12.24%39 LF - 18" HDPE@ 12.06%40 LF - 18" HDPE@ 11.86%40 LF - 18" HDPE@ 12.71%37 LF - 12" HDPE@ 16.84%ST-41STA: 12+58.01, 37.00' RRE:886.37IE:883.37 E270 LF - 30" HDPE@ 0.50%106 LF - 24" HDPE @ 0.50% 152 LF - 24" HDPE @ 0.50%ST-29STA: 35+01.68, 20.00' RRE:882.84IE:879.84 SW22 LF - 12" HDPE@ 10.15%ST-31STA: 36+71.23, 20.00' RRE:882.84IE:879.84 SE22 LF - 12" HDPE@ 5.88%ST-47STA: 23+28.48, 16.80' LRE:887.56IE:882.56 W17 LF - 12" HDPE@ 30.19%ST-45STA: 29+47.72, 36.00' LRE:890.38IE:887.38 W36 LF - 12" HDPE@ 12.83%ST-43STA: 30+37.72, 36.00' LRE:890.38IE:887.38 W36 LF - 12" HDPE@ 17.33%90 LF - 30" HDPE@ 1.00%93 LF - 30" HDPE@ 1.00%25 LF - 12" HDPE@ 6.08%ST-35STA: 32+49.04, 25.00' LRE:890.15IE:887.15 NST-33STA: 34+15.42, 25.00' LRE:889.90IE:886.90 N25 LF - 12" HDPE@ 3.20%ST-36STA: 24+08.77, 25.00' RRE:889.90IE:886.90 N25 LF - 12" HDPE@ 3.20%ST-38STA: 22+43.69, 25.00' RRE:889.90IE:886.90 N25 LF - 12" HDPE@ 7.20%ST-37RE:886.82IE:884.63 EIE:885.10 SIE:884.63 W37 LF - 12" HDPE@ 10.03%ST-39STA: 19+25.72, 37.00' RRE:889.30IE:886.30 EST-40RE:884.56IE:881.84 SIE:882.59 WIE:881.84 N200 LF - 30" HDPE@ 1.00%ST-34RE:886.81IE:884.63 WIE:885.63 SIE:884.63 EST-44RE:885.71IE:882.91 SIE:881.14 EIE:882.91 NST-46RE:884.73IE:882.01 SIE:882.76 EIE:882.01 NST-42RE:879.11IE:876.39 SIE:877.14 WIE:876.39 N130 LF - 30" HDPE@ 0.50%204 LF - 30" HDPE@ 0.50%ST-48RE:879.46IE:876.74 SIE:877.49 EIE:876.74 NST-49STA: 21+98.02, 16.80' LRE:887.56IE:882.56 W17 LF - 12" HDPE@ 34.05%ST-50RE:878.81IE:876.09 SIE:876.84 EIE:876.09 N166 LF - 24" HDPE @ 0.58% 152 LF - 24" HDPE @ 0.50%ST-27STA: 32+70.56, 20.00' RRE:882.86IE:879.86 SE23 LF - 12" HDPE@ 2.18%ST-25STA: 31+00.92, 20.00' RRE:882.86IE:879.86 S21 LF - 12" HDPE@ 4.09%880878 882 884880876878882884 884 900900 900910 900890880880876876878878882 9109 0 2 90290290490 6 90 8 9 1 2 914890900882884886888892894896898 880880 882910 906 9089089169169 0 08968 9 8 9 0 2 904910906908912 900894896898890900888892894896898882884886ST-61STA: 32+59.23, 0.00'RE:883.32IE:879.36 NWIE:879.36 SIE:879.26 EST-64STA: 32+73.75, 60.00' LRE:884.49IE:881.49 N62 LF - 12" HDPE@ 3.45%61 LF - 12" HDPE@ 4.10%ST-63STA: 31+16.57, 60.00' LRE:884.49IE:881.49 NST-62STA: 31+07.40, 0.00'RE:883.32IE:879.00 NIE:878.50 WIE:879.00 SIE:878.40 EST-67STA: 34+96.23, 60.00' LRE:884.49IE:881.49 N62 LF - 12" HDPE@ 6.30%ST-66STA: 36+62.64, 0.00'RE:883.32IE:878.56 NWIE:878.47 EIE:878.53 SIE:878.37 W61 LF - 12" HDPE@ 4.88%ST-68RE:884.49IE:881.49 NST-59STA: 15+27.72, 18.50' RRE:883.59IE:880.59 E19 LF - 12" HDPE@ 11.35%EX.IE:(876.8)EX.IE:(876.7)EX.IE:(875.3)EX. 15" RCPEX. 30" RCPEX.IE:(876.7)EX.IE:(875.8)EX. 30" RCP EX.IE:(875.5)EX.IE:(875.4)EX. 27" RCPEX. 15" RCP ST-65STA: 35+11.01, 0.00'RE:883.32IE:877.60 NEIE:877.60 SIE:879.23 W165 LF - 24" HDPE @ 0.59%8909 0 0 884 884 886 884 884 886 884 886888888 888 888 888 8828848868908868 8 8EX.IE:(874.3)EX. 36" RCPST-8RE:878.48IE:875.76 SIE:875.76 NIE:876.51 W40 LF - 18" HDPE@ -12.75%ST-69RE:880.65IE:879.00 SST-70RE:887.13IE:884.13 NPROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:NOT FORCONSTRUCTION160576021ER/AN DDGOLDEN VALLEYBUSINESS CENTERGOLDEN VALLEYBUSINESS CENTERGOLDEN VALLEY, MNNo. Description Date 2021 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE: 651-645-4197 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM © This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.\\twcfp01\MW_TWC\TWC_LDEV\United_Properties\GOLDEN VALLEY INDUSTRIAL\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\C401-STORM SEWER PLAN.dwg September 23, 2021 - 8:30pm NORTH GRADING PLAN NOTES1. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF XXXXXXX,SPECIFICATIONS AND BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS.2. CONTRACTOR TO CALL GOPHER STATE CALL ONE @ <1-800-252-1166> AT LEAST TWOWORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS.3. STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:RCP PER ASTM C-76HDPE: 0" - 10" PER AASHTO M-252HDPE: 12" OR GREATER PER ASTM F-2306PVC SCH. 40 PER ASTM D-1785STORM SEWER FITTINGS SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:RCP PER ASTM C-76, JOINTS PER ASTM C-361, C-990, AND C-443HDPE PER ASTM 3212PVC PER ASTM D-3034, JOINTS PER ASTM D-32124. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OR EXISTINGUTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO THE START OF SITE GRADING. THECONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER OF ANYDISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS.5. SUBGRADE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER EXCAVATION TOHELP OFFSET ANY STABILITY PROBLEMS DUE TO WATER SEEPAGE OR STEEP SLOPES.WHEN PLACING NEW SURFACE MATERIAL ADJACENT TO EXISTING PAVEMENT, THEEXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED PROMPTLY TO AVOID UNDERMINING OF EXISTINGPAVEMENT.6. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROL.7. CONTRACTOR SHALL EXCAVATE DRAINAGE TRENCHES TO FOLLOW PROPOSED STORMSEWER ALIGNMENTS.8. GRADES SHOWN ARE FINISHED GRADES. CONTRACTOR SHALL ROUGH GRADE TOSUBGRADE ELEVATION AND LEAVE STREET READY FOR SUBBASE.9. ALL EXCESS MATERIAL, BITUMINOUS SURFACING, CONCRETE ITEMS, ANY ABANDONEDUTILITY ITEMS, AND OTHER UNSTABLE MATERIALS SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OFTHE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE.10. REFER TO THE UTILITY PLAN FOR SANITARY SEWER MAIN, WATER MAIN SERVICELAYOUT AND ELEVATIONS AND CASTING / STRUCTURE NOTATION.11. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PAVEMENTS AND CURB ANDGUTTER WITH SMOOTH UNIFORM SLOPES TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE.12. INSTALL A MINIMUM OF <4" CLASS 5> AGGREGATE BASE UNDER CURB AND GUTTER ANDCONCRETE SIDEWALKS.13. UPON COMPLETION OF EXCAVATION AND FILLING, CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALLSTREETS AND DISTURBED AREAS ON SITE. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BERE-VEGETATED WITH A MINIMUM OF <4" OF TOPSOIL>.14. ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS/CONTOURS ARE TO GUTTER / FLOW LINE UNLESS OTHERWISENOTED.15. GRADING FOR ALL SIDEWALKS AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES INCLUDING CROSSINGDRIVEWAYS SHALL CONFORM TO CURRENT ADA STATE/NATIONAL STANDARDS. IN NOCASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE RAMP SLOPES EXCEED 1 VERTICAL TO 12 HORIZONTAL. IN NOCASE SHALL SIDEWALK CROSS SLOPES EXCEED 2% . IN NO CASE SHALL LONGITUDINALSIDEWALK SLOPES EXCEED 5%. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS ORAISLES EXCEED 2% (1.5% TARGET) IN ALL DIRECTIONS. SIDEWALK ACCESS TO EXTERNALBUILDING DOORS AND GATES SHALL BE ADA COMPLIANT. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFYENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF ADA CRITERIA CANNOT BE MET IN ANY LOCATION PRIOR TOPAVING. NO CONTRACTOR CHANGE ORDERS WILL BE ACCEPTED FOR A.D.A COMPLIANCEISSUES.16. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 0.5% GUTTER SLOPE TOWARDS LOW POINTS.17. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE 3" INSULATION BY 5' WIDE CENTERED ON STORM PIPE IFLESS THAN 4' OF COVER IN PAVEMENT AREAS AND LESS THAN 3' OF COVER INLANDSCAPE AREAS.18. ROOF DRAIN INVERT CONNECTIONS AT THE BUILDING SHALL BE AT ELEVATION <XXX.XX>OR LOWER UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. REFERENCE MEP PLANS FOR ROOF DRAINCONNECTION.19. ALL STORM SEWER CONNECTIONS SHALL BE GASKETED AND WATER TIGHT INCLUDINGMANHOLE CONNECTIONS.20. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AIR TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENTPLUMBING CODE.21. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 1.25% SLOPE IN BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT AREAS, 0.5% SLOPE INCONCRETE PAVEMENT AREAS.22. CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW PAVEMENT GRADIENT AND CONSTRUCT "INFALL CURB"WHERE PAVEMENT DRAINS TOWARD GUTTER, AND "OUTFALL" CURB WHERE PAVEMENTDRAINS AWAY FROM GUTTER.PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (SOLID CASTING)PROPOSED STORM SEWERPROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (ROUND INLET CASTING)PROPOSED STORM SEWERPROPERTY LINELEGENDPROPOSED SANITARY SEWERPROPOSED WATERMAINCOPROPOSED STORM MANHOLE/ CATCH BASIN (CURB INLET CASTING)PROPOSED STORM SEWER CLENOUTPROPOSED RIPRAPPROPOSED FLARED END SECTIONDC403STORM SEWERPLAN PROPOSEDBUILDING 2 217,000 SFFFE: 892.16PROPOSEDBUILDING 1182,000 SFFFE: 889.00COUNTRY C L U B D R I V E DOUGLAS DRIVE(COUNTY ROAD 102)GOLDEN VALLEY GOLFRIGHT OF WAYCHICAGO NORTHWESTERN RAILROADRIGHT OF WAY NO PARKINGNO PARKINGNO PARKING NO PARKINGNO PARKINGNO PARKINGNO PARKINGNO PARKINGNO PARKINGNO PARKINGPROPOSEDBUILDING 2 217,000 SFFFE: 892.16PROPOSEDBUILDING 1182,000 SFFFE: 889.00COUNTRY C L U B D R I V E DOUGLAS DRIVE(COUNTY ROAD 102)GOLDEN VALLEY GOLFRIGHT OF WAYCHICAGO NORTHWESTERN RAILROADRIGHT OF WAY NO PARKINGNO PARKINGNO PARKING NO PARKINGNO PARKINGNO PARKINGNO PARKINGNO PARKINGNO PARKINGNO PARKINGCOCO COCO SS-1RE:879.96IE:864.05 W147 LF - 8" PVC@ 1.74%201 LF - 8" PVC@ 1.74%SS-4RE:887.92IE:871.03 WIE:871.03 E195 LF - 8" PVC@ 1.74%SS-5RE:887.98IE:874.42 SIE:874.42 E37 LF - 8" PVC@ 1.74%SS-6RE:889.00IE:875.06 NCONNECT TO SSWR STUB 5' FROM BLDG.SEE MEP FOR CONTINUATION.CONNECT TO EXIST. 9" VCP SSWRCONNECT TO SSWR STUB 5' FROM BLDG.SEE MEP FOR CONTINUATION.SS-3RE:886.11IE:867.52 WIE:867.52 SCO COSS-2RE:887.85IE:864.96 NIE:864.96 ESS-7RE:890.00IE:878.62 W52 LF - 8" PVC@ 1.74%CONNECT TO EXIST. 8" SSWRCOCOCOCOSS-12RE:892.16IE:886.49 S29 LF - 8" PVC@ 1.41%SS-11RE:891.11IE:886.09 NIE:886.09 E152 LF - 8" PVC@ 1.41%SS-10RE:891.18IE:883.94 WIE:883.94 E152 LF - 8" PVC@ 1.41%SS-9RE:891.22IE:881.80 WIE:881.80 N172 LF - 8" PVC@ 1.41%SS-8RE:891.33IE:879.37 SIE:879.37 E53 LF - 8" PVC@ 1.41%SEE SHEET C403 FORSTORM SEWER DETAILSPR. 8" WATER MAINPR. FIRE HYDRANTASSEMBLYSEE SHEET C403 FORSTORM SEWER DETAILSPR. 8" WATER MAINPR. FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLYSEE SHEET C403 FORSTORM SEWER DETAILSPR. 8" WATER MAINPR. 8" WATER MAINPR. FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLYPR. FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLYSEE SHEET C403 FORSTORM SEWER DETAILSCONNECT TO EXIST.WATER LATERALPR. 8" WATER VALVECONNECT TO EXIST. COMM LINE.COORD. W/ UTILITY COMPANYPR. FIRE SERVICEPR. WATER SERVICEPR. COMM LINE.COORD. W/ UTILITY COMPANY.PRIVATE UTILITY BLDG. CONNECTION.COORD. W/ UTILITY COMPANYPRIVATE UTILITY BLDG. CONNECTION.COORD. W/ UTILITY COMPANYPRIVATE UTILITY BLDG. CONNECTION.COORD. W/ UTILITY COMPANYPRIVATE UTILITY BLDG. CONNECTION.COORD. W/ UTILITY COMPANYPR. FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLYPR. 8" WATER VALVEPR. FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLYPR. FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLYWET TAP AND CONNECT TO EXIST.8" WATER MAINPR. 8" WATER VALVECONNECT TO EXIST. POWER LINE.COORD. W/ UTILITY COMPANYCONNECT TO EXIST. GAS LINE.COORD. W/ UTILITY COMPANYPR. 8" WATER VALVEPR. FIRE SERVICEPR. WATER SERVICESETBACK LINEPR. RETAINING WALLINSTALL 20' STEEL CASINGCENTERED ON RETAINING WALLFOR UTILITY CROSSINGPR. GAS LINE.COORD. W/ UTILITY COMPANY.PR. POWER. LINE.COORD. W/ UTILITY COMPANY.PROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:NOT FORCONSTRUCTION160576021ER/AN DDGOLDEN VALLEYBUSINESS CENTERGOLDEN VALLEYBUSINESS CENTERGOLDEN VALLEY, MNNo. Description Date 2021 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE: 651-645-4197 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.\\twcfp01\MW_TWC\TWC_LDEV\United_Properties\GOLDEN VALLEY INDUSTRIAL\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\C5-UTILITY PLAN.dwg September 23, 2021 - 8:31pm UTILITY PLAN NOTES1. ALL FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE IN PLACE, AND COMPACTED BEFORE INSTALLATION OFPROPOSED UTILITIES.2. SANITARY SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:8" PVC SDR35 PER ASTM D-3034, FOR PIPES LESS THAN 12' DEEP 8" PVC SDR26 PER ASTM D-3034, FOR PIPES MORE THAN 12' DEEP6" PVC SCHEDULE 40 PER ASTM D-1785DUCTILE IRON PIPE PER AWWA C1503. WATER LINES SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:6" AND LARGER, PVC C-900 PER ASTM D 2241CLASS 200 UNDER COUNTY ROADS, OTHERWISE CLASS 1504" AND LARGER DUCTILE IRON PIPE PER AWWA C150SMALLER THAN 3" PIPING SHALL BE COPPER TUBE TYPE "K" PERANSI 816.22 OR PVC, 200 P.S.I., PER ASTM D1784 AND D2241.4. MINIMUM TRENCH WIDTH SHALL BE 2 FEET.5. ALL WATER JOINTS ARE TO BE MECHANICAL JOINTS WITH RESTRAINTS SUCH AS THRUSTBLOCKING, WITH STAINLESS STEEL OR COBALT BLUE BOLTS, OR AS INDICATED IN THECITY SPECIFICATIONS AND PROJECT DOCUMENTS.6. ALL UTILITIES SHOULD BE KEPT TEN (10') APART (PARALLEL) OR WHEN CROSSING 18"VERTICAL CLEARANCE (OUTSIDE EDGE OF PIPE TO OUTSIDE EDGE OF PIPE ORSTRUCTURE).7. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 7'-5" COVER ON ALL WATERLINES.8.IN THE EVENT OF A VERTICAL CONFLICT BETWEEN WATER LINES, SANITARY LINES,STORM LINES AND GAS LINES, OR ANY OBSTRUCTION (EXISTING AND PROPOSED), THESANITARY LINE SHALL BE SCH. 40 OR C900 WITH MECHANICAL JOINTS AT LEAST 10 FEETON EITHER SIDE OF THE CENTER LINE OF THE CROSSING. THE WATER LINE SHALL HAVEMECHANICAL JOINTS WITH APPROPRIATE FASTENERS AS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE AMINIMUM OF 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION. MEETING REQUIREMENTS OF ANSI A21.10 ORANSI 21.11 (AWWA C-151) (CLASS 50).9. LINES UNDERGROUND SHALL BE INSTALLED, INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFOREBACKFILLING.10. TOPS OF MANHOLES SHALL BE RAISED AS NECESSARY TO BE FLUSH WITH PROPOSEDPAVEMENT ELEVATIONS, AND TO BE ONE FOOT ABOVE FINISHED GROUND ELEVATIONS, INGREEN AREAS, WITH WATERTIGHT LIDS.11. ALL CONCRETE FOR ENCASEMENTS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 28 DAY COMPRESSIONSTRENGTH AT 3000 P.S.I.12. EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE VERIFIED IN FIELD PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY NEWLINES.13. REFER TO INTERIOR PLUMBING DRAWINGS FOR TIE-IN OF ALL UTILITIES.14. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING TO THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE CITYOF XXXXXXX AND/OR STATE OF XX WITH REGARDS TO MATERIALS AND INSTALLATION OFTHE WATER AND SEWER LINES.15. THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATIONOF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON RECORDS OF THEVARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES, AND WHERE POSSIBLE, MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THEFIELD. THE INFORMATION IS NOT TO BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE. THECONTRACTOR MUST CALL THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES AT LEAST 72 HOURSBEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES. IT SHALLBE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIESWHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS.16. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL NECESSARY INSPECTIONS AND/ORCERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY CODES AND/OR UTILITY SERVICE COMPANIES.17. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES FOR INSTALLATIONREQUIREMENTS AND SPECIFICATIONS.18. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE ARCH / MEP PLANS FOR SITE LIGHTING ANDELECTRICAL PLAN.19. BACKFLOW DEVICES (DDCV AND PRZ ASSEMBLIES) AND METERS ARE LOCATED IN THEINTERIOR OF THE BUILDING. REF. ARCH / MEP PLANS.20. ALL ONSITE WATERMAINS AND SANITARY SEWERS SHALL BE PRIVATELY OWNED ANDMAINTAINED.21. ALL WATERMAIN STUBOUTS SHALL BE MECHANICALLY RESTRAINED WITH REACTIONBLOCKING.NORTH SANITARY SEWER MANHOLESTORM SEWERSANITARY SEWERWATERMAINGATE VALVEHYDRANTTEEREDUCERUNDERGROUND ELECTRICTELEPHONEGAS MAINSTORM SEWERLEGENDCOSANITARY CLEANOUTCOEXISTINGPROPOSEDC500UTILITY PLAN875.46 SS INV868.22 SSWR TOP882.01 SS INV879.87 SSWR TOP Golden Valley City Council Meeting December 7, 2021 Agenda Item 4. C. 2. Continuation of Public Hearing – Zoning Map Amendment for 6300 Olson Memorial Highway, Ordinance No. 724 Prepared By Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager Summary United Properties is proposing three planning actions to allow for the redevelopment of 6300 Olson Memorial Highway. They are requesting a change to the Future Land Use Map (from Office use to Light Industrial use), a change to the Zoning Map (from the Office Zoning District to the Light Industrial Zoning District), and a subdivision of the property to create two new lots (one north, one south). These changes would require that the existing building be demolished and would allow for the construction of two new office/warehouse buildings as part of a new business center. At its meeting on October 25, the Planning Commission voted (3-2) to recommend approval of the zoning change. This item was tabled at the November 16 City Council meeting. Background and Existing Conditions For details on the background of this rezoning request and the existing conditions of the site itself, please refer to the attached staff memo to the Planning Commission. Proposal The zoning request would change the designated zoning from Office to Light Industrial. Required Process Support from the City Council for this proposal would also necessitate review and approval from the Metropolitan Council for the change in land use, requiring a delay in the final vote on the rezoning and the subdivision until the land use change was approved. Staff Review The City Code does not set specific standards for changing a zoning designation, and the City Council – with the input of the Planning Commission – has a great deal of latitude in deciding if the request is consistent with the broader zoning map for the city. In making a determination, the City should take into account the purpose of zoning as outlined in the City code, which is “to regulate land use within the City, including the location, size, use, and height of buildings, the arrangement of buildings on lots, and the City Council Regular Meeting Executive Summary City of Golden Valley December 7, 2021 2 density of population within the City for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, order, convenience, and general welfare of all citizens of the City.” (Sec. 113-2) This rezoning request seeks to change the site’s zoning from Office to Light Industrial. The purpose statements for both districts follow: Office Zoning The purpose of the Office Zoning District is to provide areas for the offices, clinics, day care centers, financial institutions, and other compatible uses that serve local and regional needs. The District fosters employment opportunities and encourages transitions between land uses. The District is not intended to serve as an area for the sale of or handling of goods, wares, merchandise, or commodities. Light Industrial Zoning The purpose of the Light Industrial Zoning District is to provide for the establishment of warehousing, offices, and light industrial developments. Allowed Uses The following principal uses are listed as permitted in the Office Zoning District: 1. Offices 2. Clinics – medical, dental, or optical 3. Financial institutions 4. Essential services, Class I In addition to these four uses, adult day care centers, child care centers, daytime activities centers, drive- through facilities for financial institutions, heliports, limited retail services accessory to an office, recreational facilities accessory to an office, and laboratories (medical, dental, or R&D) are permitted by conditional use permit. In the Light Industrial Zoning District, allowed uses are focused on warehousing and light manufacturing or assembly uses that are not considered to be a nuisance to adjacent districts. Offices are also considered to be a “by right” use. Due to its length, a complete list of permitted, restricted, conditional, and prohibited uses is included as an attachment. Compatibility Another important consideration is whether the rezoning would be compatible with surrounding uses. The site is surrounded by a variety of zoning designations, but is also separated from many of them by rights-of-way that act as barriers or buffers. To the north, a medium density residential development and a vacant office building (soon to be replaced with high density housing) sit north of the Union Pacific railroad corridor. To the east, other industrial and commercial uses line Douglas Drive and the frontage road. To the south, Olson Memorial Highway provides a significant barrier to the Perpich Center and nearby single-family homes. A Montessori preschool is located closer, on the other side of Country Club Drive. The only immediately adjacent property is the driving range for the Golden Valley Country Club to the west. City Council Regular Meeting Executive Summary City of Golden Valley December 7, 2021 3 Zoning Map – existing conditions It should be noted that until late in 2020, this property was zoned Industrial and operated in harmony with surrounding properties. Given the varied zoning designations and uses at this south end of Douglas Drive, staff does not anticipate any significant incompatibilities. Setback Requirements and Height Restrictions. In the Light Industrial Zoning District, front yard setbacks for principal structures are 35 feet from the property line, similar to other zoning districts in the city. For this property, required side and rear yard setbacks would vary to account for the adjacent zoning designations. To the north, along the railroad track, the building setback would be 20 feet. To the west, along the Country Club, the building setback would be 50 feet. There is sufficient lot area at this location to provide those setbacks. Building height in the Light Industrial district is limited to four stories or 45 feet, whichever is less. The applicant has indicated a maximum building height of approximately 34 to 36 feet is anticipated to allow for the proposed warehouse uses. For reference, the height of the existing building, at its tallest point, is 32 feet. Traffic As described in the land use memo, traffic associated with uses allowed in a Light Industrial Zoning District is expected to be lighter and more dispersed throughout the day compared to office or other professional uses permitted in the Office Zoning District. Staff Findings The site under consideration would be rezoned to a designation that would allow new development that is similar to other uses in the surrounding area and that would not be out of character with other recent City Council Regular Meeting Executive Summary City of Golden Valley December 7, 2021 4 zoning map amendments to the east. While this means the rezoning would not be considered “spot zoning,” staff believes it is prudent to provide adequate factual findings in the record to support the decision. Given staff’s review, and weighing the opportunities and challenges provided by a change in zoning, the following findings from staff are made in support of rezoning the parcel in question to a Light Industrial designation: 1. The site is currently in an area with a variety of zoning designations, including some that allow for light industrial uses, and would not be out of character with the surrounding neighborhood. 2. Engineering staff is not concerned about the traffic generated by the business center proposed for this site and believes the recent reconstruction of Douglas Drive is more than sufficient to handle what would likely be a decrease in trips compared to historic levels. 3. As noted in the accompanying memo on the site’s land use change, the use of this site for a business center fits with a number of the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. 4. Additionally, the site has been vacant for over five years despite numerous parties having expressed interest. Rezoning this land and allowing for a different type of development to occur would put a significant area back into productive use. 5. While the focus of rezoning should be on all potential future users under the Light Industrial zoning designation, the narrative provided by United Properties demonstrates an understanding of the current real estate market and desire to provide high quality buildings that are fitting for a prominent location. Discussion at Planning Commission The Planning Commission heard the future land use map amendment, zoning map amendment, and subdivision requests at its meeting on October 25. For both the land use and the zoning change, the Planning Commission voted 3-2 to recommend approval of the requests. Commissioners discussed if a more desirable use/zoning would be the City’s Employment Mixed Use designation – similar to the land on the east side of Douglas Drive. Staff and the applicant indicated that many of the site regulations associated with the Mixed Use zoning district would not be compatible with the proposed business center use and that the Light Industrial designation was viewed to be the most appropriate. Minutes from this meeting are attached to provide additional details on the discussion. Financial Or Budget Considerations None Recommended Action In order to be consistent with the adopted 2040 Comprehensive Plan, the City should wait to act on this item until the Metropolitan Council has approved the recent Comprehensive Plan amendment reguiding this property to Light Industrial use. Motion to table the adoption of Ordinance No. 724, Amending the Zoning Map and Rezoning 6300 Olson Memorial Highway from Office to Light Industrial until the change in land use has been reviewed by the Metropolitan Council. City Council Regular Meeting Executive Summary City of Golden Valley December 7, 2021 5 Supporting Documents • Memo to the Planning Commission dated October 25, 2021 (4 pages) • Ordinance No. 724, Amending the Zoning Map and Rezoning 6300 Olson Memorial Highway from Office to Light Industrial (1 page) • Zoning Map (1 page) • Uses in the Light Industrial Zoning District (3 pages) 1 Date: October 25, 2021 To: Golden Valley Planning Commission From: Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager Subject: Informal Public Hearing – Zoning Map Amendment for 6300 Olson Memorial Highway Summary of Request United Properties is proposing three planning actions to allow for the redevelopment of 6300 Olson Memorial Highway. They are requesting a change to the Future Land Use Map (from Office use to Light Industrial use), a change to the Zoning Map (from the Office Zoning District to the Light Industrial Zoning District), and a subdivision of the property to create two new lots (one north, one south). These changes would require that the existing building be demolished and would allow for the construction of two new office/warehouse buildings as part of a new business center. Background and Existing Conditions For details on the background of this rezoning request and the existing conditions of the site itself, please refer to the accompanying memo on the proposed change in guided land use. Proposal The zoning request would change the designated zoning from Office to Light Industrial. Required Process Support from the Planning Commission and City Council for this proposal would also necessitate review and approval from the Metropolitan Council for the change in land use, requiring a delay in the final vote on the rezoning and the subdivision until the land use change was approved. Staff Review The City Code does not set specific standards for changing a zoning designation, and the City Council – with the input of the Planning Commission – has a great deal of latitude in deciding if the request is consistent with the broader zoning map for the city. In making a determination, the City should take into account the purpose of zoning as outlined in the City code, which is “to regulate land use within the City, including the location, size, use, and height of buildings, the arrangement of buildings on lots, and the density of population within the City for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, order, convenience, and general welfare of all citizens of the City.” (Sec. 113‐2) 2 This rezoning request seeks to change the site’s zoning from Office to Light Industrial. The purpose statements for both districts follow: Office Zoning The purpose of the Office Zoning District is to provide areas for the offices, clinics, day care centers, financial institutions, and other compatible uses that serve local and regional needs. The District fosters employment opportunities and encourages transitions between land uses. The District is not intended to serve as an area for the sale of or handling of goods, wares, merchandise, or commodities. Light Industrial Zoning The purpose of the Light Industrial Zoning District is to provide for the establishment of warehousing, offices, and light industrial developments. Allowed Uses The following principal uses are listed as permitted in the Office Zoning District: 1. Offices 2. Clinics – medical, dental, or optical 3. Financial institutions 4. Essential services, Class I In addition to these four uses, adult day care centers, child care centers, daytime activities centers, drive‐through facilities for financial institutions, heliports, limited retail services accessory to an office, recreational facilities accessory to an office, and laboratories (medical, dental, or R&D) are permitted by conditional use permit. In the Light Industrial Zoning District, allowed uses are focused on warehousing and light manufacturing or assembly uses that are not considered to be a nuisance to adjacent districts. Offices are also considered to be a “by right” use. Due to its length, a complete list of permitted, restricted, conditional, and prohibited uses is included as an attachment. Compatibility Another important consideration is whether the rezoning would be compatible with surrounding uses. 3 Zoning Map – existing conditions The site is surrounded by a variety of zoning designations, but is also separated from many of them by rights‐of‐way that act as barriers or buffers. To the north, a medium density residential development and a vacant office building (soon to be replaced with high density housing) sit north of the Union Pacific railroad corridor. To the east, other industrial and commercial uses line Douglas Drive and the frontage road. To the south, Olson Memorial Highway provides a significant barrier to the Perpich Center and nearby single‐family homes. A Montessori preschool is located closer, on the other side of Country Club Drive. The only immediately adjacent property is the driving range for the Golden Valley Country Club to the west. It should be noted that until late in 2020, this property was zoned Industrial and operated in harmony with surrounding properties. Given the varied zoning designations and uses at this south end of Douglas Drive, staff does not anticipate any significant incompatibilities. Setback Requirements and Height Restrictions. In the Light Industrial Zoning District, front yard setbacks for principal structures are 35 feet from the property line, similar to other zoning districts in the city. For this property, required side and rear yard setbacks would vary to account for the adjacent zoning designations. To the north, along the railroad track, the building setback would be 20 feet. To the west, along the Country Club, the building setback would be 50 feet. There is sufficient lot area at this location to provide those setbacks. Building height in the Light Industrial district is limited to four stories or 45 feet, whichever is less. The applicant has indicated a maximum building height of approximately 34 to 36 feet is 4 anticipated to allow for the proposed warehouse uses. For reference, the height of the existing building, at its tallest point, is 32 feet. Traffic As described in the land use memo, traffic associated with uses allowed in a Light Industrial Zoning District is expected to be lighter and more dispersed throughout the day compared to office or other professional uses permitted in the Office Zoning District. Staff Findings The site under consideration would be rezoned to a designation that would allow new development that is similar to other uses in the surrounding area and that would not be out of character with other recent zoning map amendments to the east. While this means the rezoning would not be considered “spot zoning,” staff believes it is prudent to provide adequate factual findings in the record to support the decision. Given staff’s review, and weighing the opportunities and challenges provided by a change in zoning, the following findings from staff are made in support of rezoning the parcel in question to a Light Industrial designation: 1. The site is currently in an area with a variety of zoning designations, including some that allow for light industrial uses, and would not be out of character with the surrounding neighborhood. 2. Engineering staff is not concerned about the traffic generated by the business center proposed for this site and believes the recent reconstruction of Douglas Drive is more than sufficient to handle what would likely be a decrease in trips compared to historic levels. 3. As noted in the accompanying memo on the site’s land use change, the use of this site for a business center fits with a number of the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. 4. Additionally, the site has been vacant for over five years despite numerous parties having expressed interest. Rezoning this land and allowing for a different type of development to occur would put a significant area back into productive use. 5. While the focus of rezoning should be on all potential future users under the Light Industrial zoning designation, the narrative provided by United Properties demonstrates an understanding of the current real estate market and desire to provide high quality buildings that are fitting for a prominent location. Recommended Action Based on the findings above, staff recommends approval of the requested amendment to the Zoning Map, changing the zoning designation for 6300 Olson Memorial Highway from Office to Light Industrial. Attachments: Zoning Map (1 page) Uses in the Light Industrial Zoning District (3 pages) ORDINANCE NO. 724 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE CHAPTER 113 Rezoning 6300 Olson Memorial Highway from Office to Light Industrial United Properties, Applicant The City Council for the City of Golden Valley hereby ordains: Section 1. City Code chapter 113 entitled “Zoning” is amended in Section 113-55 Subd. (b) by changing the zoning designation of certain tracts of land from Office to Light Industrial. Section 2. The tracts of land affected by this ordinance are legally described as: Lot 1, Auditor's Subdivision No. 322, Hennepin County, Minnesota; and All that part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 32, Township 118, Range 21, lying South of the right of way of the Electric Short Line Railroad Company and East of the West 653 feet thereof; and The East 323 feet of the West 653 feet of that part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter lying South of the right of way of the Minnesota Western Railway Company; The East 323 feet of the West 653 feet of that part of the Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter lying North of the center line of 6th Avenue North; all in Section 32, Township 118, Range 21. Section 3. City Code Chapter 1 entitled “General Provisions” and Sec. 1-8 entitled “General Penalty; Continuing Violations” are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 4. This ordinance shall take effect form and after its passage and publication as required by law. Adopted by the City Council this 7th day of December, 2021. /s/Shepard M. Harris Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: /s/Theresa J. Schyma Theresa J. Schyma, City Clerk !!! !!! ! !!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!! ! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!!!!!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! !!!!!!!!!!!! ! !! !!!! !!!!! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!! !!!! !!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! !!!!!M edi c i neLakeBranchIkePond Colonial Pond Ottawa Pond Glen-woodPond EgretPond LilacPond DuluthPond St.CroixPond Chicago Pond LilacPond Pond CTurners PondGlen 1 Pond DuckPond Loop EPond Loop FPond Sweeney LakeWirth LakeTwin LakeB a s s ett C re e k Hampshire Pond DecolaPond A NorthRicePond West RingPond Cortlawn Pond DecolaPonds B & C Westwood Lake SchaperPond SouthRicePond East RingPond Bassett CreekDecolaPondE DecolaPond F BreckPond NatchezPond MinnaquaPond WirthPond Toledo/AngeloPond HoneywellPond StrawberryPond DecolaPond D Bas s e tt Cr e e k BassettC r e e k Basset t Cr eekBassettC r e e k BassettC reekSweeney L akeBranchSweeney Lake BranchNW LoopPondBoone Avenue PondMain Stem Pond B Pond C Bassett Creek NatureArea Pond Medicine Lake BrookviewPond A Hidden LakesPond 1 Pond 2A Pond 2B Pond 3 Schaper BallfieldPond Pond O Pond J Spirit of Hope Church Pond GoldenRidgePond Golden Meadows Pond SoccerFieldPond WestPond 201GeneralMillsPond HaroldPond Medicine Lake Road Pond Xenia MitigationPond 10th AvePond SpringPond Briar-woodPond LaurelHills Pond JFB NWPond LogisPond BrownieLake BirchPond MinnaquaWetland GrimesPondBassett CreekPark Pond SweeneyLakeBranchPond M Pond F Pond DP ond E Dover HillPondLiberty BasinBrookviewGolf Course LionsPark WesleyPark Sochacki Park SchaperPark ScheidParkHampshirePark MedleyPark Briarwood Laurel Avenue Greenbelt Glenview TerracePark North TyrolPark Western AvenueMarsh Nature Area GeartyPark Sandburg AthleticFacility NatchezPark ValleyView ParkPennsylvaniaWoods BassettCreekNature Area WildwoodPark IsaacsonPark SouthTyrol Park SeemanPark AdelineNature Area YosemitePark StockmanPark Golden OaksPark St CroixPark LakeviewPark SweeneyPark Perpich CenterBall Fields Ronald B. Davis Community Center Brookview Park Westwood HillsNature Center (SLP) (MPRB) Theodore WirthRegional Park Eloise Butler WildflowerGarden and Bird Sanctuary Wirth LakeBeach Golden RidgeNature Area General Mills NaturePreserve General Mills ResearchNature Area BooneOpenSpace GoldenHills Pond MadisonPond SouthTyrolPond LibraryHill IdahoWetland GeorgiaOpen Space ArdmoreNorth&SouthPonds JanalynPond MeadowPond O p e n S p a c e OrklaOpenSpace PicnicPavilion Chalet SochackiPark (Three Rivers Park Dist.) Bassett Valley Open Space ByrdBluffOpenSpace → FishingDock PaisleyPark XeniaOpenSpace DahlbergOpenSpace Minnaqua Greenbelt (TRPD) (Mpls Park & Rec Board) Plymouth Avenue The Trailhead 456766 456770 456766 456740 456740 4567156 4567102 §¨¦394 §¨¦394 Æÿ55 Æÿ55 Æÿ100 Æÿ100 £¤169 £¤169 34th Ave N Medicine Lake Rd BroggerCir Knoll St Lilac Dr NLilac Dr NThotland Rd Mendelssohn Ave NWinnetka Ave NSunnyridgeCir Western Ave (WaterfordDr)Hillsboro Ave NZealandAve N Aquila Ave NOrkla DrWisconsin Ave N23rd Ave N KalternLn Wynnwood Rd 25th Ave N Bies DrJonellen Ln Sumter Ave NRhodeIslandAveNPatsy Ln Valders Ave NWinnetka Ave NDuluth St Florida Ave NSandburg Rd HeritageCirKentley Ave Wynnwood Rd Kenneth Way Unity Ave NB a s s e ttC r e e k D rQuailAveNScott Ave NLilac Dr NLowry Ter 33rd Ave N Noble Ave NCross LnQuail Ave NScott Ave NRegent Ave NToledo Ave NIndiana Ave N(BridgewaterRd)(WaterfordCt)(Hid d e nLnkesPkwy)Meadow Ln NFrance Ave NTopel Rd Unity Ave NPhoenix St Parkview TerWelcomeAveNWelcomeC ir W e l c o meAveNXeniaAveNZ a n e Av e NLindsay St St Croix Ave N St Croix Ave N Yosemite Ave NWolfberryLnBrunswick Ave NCounty Rd 102Westmore Way Green Valley Rd Louisiana Ave NKelly DrMaryland Ave NOlympia St Winsdale St Winnetka Ave NYukon CtWesleyDr Wesley Dr Plymouth Ave N 10th Ave N Kelly DrVarner CirPennsylvania Ave NFaribault StQuebec Ave NRhode Island Ave NPhoenix St Knoll St County Rd 156Jersey Ave NCountryClubDr P h o e n ix S tDouglas DrGeorgia Ave NCou n ty R d40 Hampshire Ave NWestch esterCirJersey Ave NGardenParkQuebe c Av e SWinnetka Ave NWally St Ensign Ave N7th Ave N Golden Valle y Rd Decatur Ave N10th Ave N Natchez Ave NXerxes Ave N (Mpls)Olson Memorial Hwy Cutacross Rd Olson Memorial Hwy Earl St Flag Ave NHampshire LnJersey Ave NFloridaAveNEdgewoodAve NDouglas DrDuluth Ln Scott Ave N Drake Rd Lowry Ter Kyle Ave NQuail Ave NPerry Ave NNoble Ave NCulver Rd Dawnview Ter Dona Ln Noble Ave NScottAveNGl e ndenTer Culver R d Marie Ln W Hampton Rd RegentAveNPerryAveNLilac Dr N27th Ave N Merribee Dr Kyle Ave NHampton RdOrchard Ave NMarie Ln E Lee Ave NKyle Ave NDresde n L n Kewanee W ay 26th Ave N Me ri d i a n D r P a r k vi e w B l v d Terrace LnManor DrMcNair DrByrd Ave N B a s s ettCreekDrMaryHillsDrZenith Ave NVista DrXerxes Ave NYork Ave NS t M a rg are t D rZephyr PlXerxes Ave NXerxes Ave N (Mpls)(SkylineDr)Spruce TrKyle PlW e s t b r o o k R d Noble Ave Frontage RdCircleDownOrchard Ave NPerryAveNWindsorWayWestbendR dUnity Ave NG reenview LnRegent Ave NSorell Ave Frontenac Ave Quail Ave NSt Croix Ave N Winsdale St StCroixCirAngelo DrUnity Ave NAlfred Rd Spring Valley RdN o b l e DrMajor DrAdeline LnAngelo DrAngelo DrWills PlToledo Ave NOttawa Ave NKillarney DrZane Ave NWoodstock A v e Woodstock Ave Loring LnYosemiteAveN Turners Crossroad NWestchesterCirN F r ontageRdFlorida Ave NHampshire Ave NPlymouth Ave N Idaho Ave NOlympia StHampshire Ave NArcher Ave NKelly DrPennsylvania Ave NDuluth St Xylon Ave NWisconsin Ave NSumter Ave NBoone Ave NWinsdale St Meadow Ln N DahlbergD r Woodstock Ave Poplar Dr Meadow Ln NChatelain T e r Natchez Ave NEdgewood Ave NK i n g s t o n C i r Glenwood Ave Country Club DrValdersAveNOrkla DrElgin PlDecaturAveN Indiana Ave NRoanoke CirWestern Ave Western Ave Harold Ave Loring Ln WestwoodDrNArdmoreDrWinsdale St Knoll St Oak Grove CirDuluth St Zane Ave NDouglas Dr27th Ave N Bonnie Ln Medicine Lake Rd Madison Ave W Nevada Ave NLouisiana Ave NCounty Rd 70 ValdersAve NValders Ave N23rd Ave N Rhode IslandAve NCounty Rd 156Medicine Lake Rd Mendelssohn Ave NWinsdale St St Cro ix Ave N June Ave NLegend DrLegendLn General Mills BlvdBoone Ave NSunnyridge LnGlenwood Ave Janalyn CirJanalyn CirGlencrest Rd Meadow Ln SWayzata BlvdWestwood Dr SWestwoodLn StrawberryLnOttawa Ave NOttawa Ave SNatchez Ave S Tyrol Crest SussexRdJune Ave SWayzata Blvd FairlawnWayNatchez Ave SOttawa Ave SPrincetonAve SDouglas Ave Circle DownTurners Crossroad SGolden Hills Dr Laurel AveLaurel Ave Hampshire Ave SDakota Ave SBrunswick Ave SKing Hill RdGlenwood Ave Colonial Dr Medicine Lake Rd FloridaAveSAlley Market StMarket St Louisiana Ave SLaurel AvePennsylvania Ave SRhode Island Ave SSumter Ave SUtah Ave SGregory Rd VermontAve SWi sc o ns i n AveSGeneral Mills BlvdHanley RdRidgeway Rd Laurel Ave QubecAve S County Rd 102Nevada Ave SColonial RdLouisianaAveSKentucky Ave SJersey Ave SHeathbrookeCir G len w o o d P kw y(Carriage Path)Xenia Ave SFlorida CtLilacD r NOlson Memorial Hwy Schaper Rd Lilac Dr NG o lden V alley R dLilac Dr N(WoodlandTrail)(Wat.Dr) BassettCreek Ln (NobleDr)France Ave S (Mpls)N Frontage Rd S Frontage Rd Olson Mem HwyAdair Ave NAdair Ave NWestbrookRd 34th Ave N Mendelssohn Ave NAlley-Unimproved--Unimproved- Wayzata Blvd Wayzata BlvdBoone Ave NG o ld e n V a lle y D rSchullerCirN F r o n t a g e R d S F r o n t a g e R d Rhode IslandAve N Pennsylvania Ave SAlley Alley (Private)AlleyAlleyLilac Dr NXerxes Ave N (Mpls)Harold Ave WestwoodDr N Ardmore DrT h e o d o r e Wirt h P k w y Tyrol Tr(Mendelssohn Ln)AlleyS Frontage Rd AlpinePassBren n e r PassDou g la s Ave QuentinAveSTyrol TrailTy r olTr a ilSunsetRidge Westw oodDrS RavineTrTyrol Trai l J analyn C irMadd usLn MeadowLnS AvondaleRdBurntsideDr S u nnyridgeLnBru n swickAveNLeberLn C loverleafDrCloverLnCl overleaf D r TheodoreWirthPkwyBeverly Ave B u rn tsideDrSpringValleyRdT oledoAveN Duluth St GoldenValle y R dSpringValleyCirC ou nty Rd 66 (Island Dr)(IslandDr)GoldenValley Rd TheodoreWirthPkwyW irth P kw yW ay z a t a Bl vd G le n w o o d P kwyPlymouthAve N (Mpls)ZenithAveNCrest vi ewA ve By r d A v e N Hwy 55 Glenwood Ave Bassett CreekDrLegend DrLeeAveNLeeAveNMajorAveNLeeAveNE l m daleRd AdellA veM in n a quaDr M innaquaD r ToledoAveNOrdwayMa rkayRidge Orchard Ave NN o r m a n d y P l CherokeePlQuailAveNRegentAveNTr ito n DrT r ito n D rL o w r y Ter 3 3rd AveN SandburgLn Lamplighter L n BrookridgeAveNValeCrestRdWinfieldAveCounty Rd 66 P ark Place Blv d (SLP)I-394SF r o n tage Rd (SLP)Xeni aAveSCounty Rd 70 L ilacD rNLilacDrNLila cD r NConstanceDrWConstanceDrESandburg Rd S Frontage Rd N Frontage Rd N Frontage RdOlsonMemorialHwy S F r o n t a g e R d O l s o n M e m o r ia lH w y OlsonMemorialHwy Valleywo odCirYosemite CirLawn TerR adisson Rd Turnpike RdA lle y AlleyTu r npikeR d Col on ial Dr GlenwoodAve BrunswickAve NMeanderRd MeanderRdIdahoAveNHaroldAve Wayzata Blvd I-394SFrontageRd Edgewo odAveSIdahoAveNCortlawnCirWCortlawn Cir S CortlawnCirN Dawnv i e wTerCounty Rd 70 EdgewoodAveSK in gCreekRdKentu ckyAveNLouisianaAveNMarylandAve SRhodeIslandAveSRidgewayRdEwaldTe rWestern Ter FieldD r Brookview Pk w y N Harold Ave HalfMoonDr RidgewayRdG oldenValleyR d(B a s sett Creek Blvd) Lewis Rd 10thAve N EllisLnPlym outhAveN Plymouth Ave N Faribault St OrklaDrCastleCt Winnetka Heights D rKelly Dr Maryland Av eNHampshire Pl Olympia St Oregon Ave NQuebecAveNValdersAveNOrklaDrKnoll S tWisconsin AveNWinsdaleSt Mandan AveNCounty Rd 102AquilaAveNAquila AveNZealandAveNJulianne Ter Ju lia nneTerPatsy Ln WisconsinAveNAquilaAveNWestbend Rd WinnetkaHeightsDr ZealandAveNOrklaDrValdersCtValdersAve NWinnetkaHeights Dr A q uilaAveNZealandAveNS cottAveNRose ManorDuluthSt Duluth St CavellAveNEnsignAveNElg in Pl 23r d Ave N Medle y L n (Medley Rd) (Medley C ir)H illsboroAveN(English Cir )(Mayf airR d)(Kin g sVa l l e y Rd)(K ings V al leyRdE)(KingsVall e yRd W ) ( S tr o d e n C ir)(Tama rin Tr ) (Mar qui sRd) Ski Hill R d MajorCirLeeAveNMajorAveNRhodeIslandAveNG o ld e n V alleyR d G o ld e n V a lle y R dG olden V alleyR d Hwy100H w y 10 0Hwy100Hwy100Hwy100Hwy100 H w y 3 9 4 Hwy 394 Hwy 394 Hwy 394 Hwy 394ColoradoAve NHwy169Hwy169Hwy169Hwy169Hwy169Colorado Ave SGoldenHills DrPaisleyLnPaisleyLn I-394NFrontageRd I -3 9 4 N Frontage Rd WayzataBlvd I-394SFrontag e R d York AveNValeryRdW asatchLn Hwy 55 Hwy 55 H w y 5 5 O l s o n M e m o r i a l H w yHwy 55 H w y 5 5 County Rd 40 County Rd 40 Glenwood A v e CountyR d 4 0 CountyRd40 GoldenValley R d C o u nty Rd 66ManchesterDr County Rd 156OregonAveS24th Ave N LilacDrNRoanokeRdLouisianaAveN Turnpike RdLilacLoop (Sunnyridge Ln)WisconsinAveN GettysburgCt(Laurel Pt) (Laure lCurv)Independence Ave NGettysburg Ave NFlag Ave NWheelerBlvdAlleyNaper St B e tty CrockerDr Decatur Ave N(WesleyCommonsDr)Winnetka Ave S Winnetka Ave SHanley RdBrookviewPkwySWayzataBlvd I-394 S Fron t a g e R d Olympia St Independence Ave NHillsboro Ave NGettysburg Ave NU n io n P acific Railroad Canadian Pacific Railroad B u rlin g to n N o rt h e r n Sant aFeRailroadCanadianPacificRailroadC anadianP acificR ailroadC anadia n P a c i f i c R ailroad U nion Pacific R a i l r o a d Breck School SandburgMiddle School Perpich Center for Arts Education MNDOT District Office & State Highway Patrol NobleElementarySchool CalvaryLutheranChurch Speak theWord Church 10th AvenueCold Storage School ofEngineeringand Arts GovernmentCenter &Fire Station #1 MeadowbrookElementarySchool King of GraceLutheranChurchand School Churchof St.MargaretMary Good ShepherdCatholic Church&Good ShepherdSchool GoldenValleyLutheranChurch Spirit ofHopeChurch Oak Grove Church HennepinCounty SheriffCommunications Hennepin CountyLibrary Fire Station#3 Valley Community Presbyterian Church ChristianLifeCenter UnityChristChurch RedeemerReformedChurch FireStation#2 Valley of PeaceLutheran Church Golden ValleyCemetery Golden ValleyHistoricalSociety BrookviewCommunityCenter Breck IceArena WaterReservoir U.S.Post Office Loveworks Academy forVisual & Performing Arts On FireMinistry C I T Y O F N E W H O P E C I T Y O F C R Y S T A L C I T Y O F R O B B I N S D A L E CITY OF MINNEAPOLISC I T Y O F S T . L O U I S P A R K CITY OF MINNEAPOLISCITY OFST. LOUIS PARKCITY OF ROBBINSDALECITY OF CRYSTAL CITY OF CRYSTALC I T Y O F N E W H O P E CITY OF PLYMOUTHCITY OF MINNEAPOLISC I T Y O FST. L O U I S P A R KCITY OFPLYMOUTH74 83 94 88 7 5 13 34 8 25 78 87 79 6 75 86 27 56 66 90 46 3365 71 6795 51 70 8163 53 22 93 91 76 84 3947 1-A 72 61 59 68 30-B 77 1-B 42 28 44 89 36 24 18-A 55 2658 95 26-A34 14 48 54 41 98 96 97 100 109 121 120 118 115117123 113 114 110 122 124 112 C C B B A A City of Golden ValleyPlanning Department7800 Golden Valley RoadGolden Valley, MN 55427-4588763-593-8095www.goldenvalleymn.gov Official Zoning Map Zoning Districts I:\Maps\ZoningMap.pdf ORDINANCE NO. 271, 2ND SERIES This is to certify that this is the Official Zoning Map referred to in Section 11.11of the Zoning Chapter of the City Code of the City of Golden Valley. Approved Amendments: Official Zoning Map Ordinance Number CommentsCity CouncilAdoption Date Visit the Planning Department at City Hall for a list of amendments approved since adoption. Print Date: 6/8/2021Sources: Hennepin County Surveyors Office for Property Lines (2021). City of Golden Valley for all other layers. 0 800 1,600 2,400 3,200400Feet I Adopted this 22nd day of November 2002. 59 (C) Commercial (LI) Light Industrial (I) Industrial (I-3) Medical: Rest Homes, Nursing Homes, Sanitariums (I-4) Golf Courses, Parks, Playgrounds, City Offices (I-5) Cemeteries (O) Office (I-1) Assembly: Churches, Schools (I-2) Civic: Libraries, Museums, Colleges Not Zoned Planned Unit Development (PUD) See the "Official Flood Zone Profile and Map" on file with the City - The collection of floodprofiles contained in the Flood Insurance Study, Volumes 1 of 2 and 2 of 2, Hennepin County, Minnesota, all jurisdictions, dated November 4, 2016, including the Flood Insurance Rate Mapsfor the City of Golden Valley, panels 27053C0194F, 27053C0213F, 27053C0214F, 27053C0332F, 27053C0351F, 27053C0352F and 27053C0354F, dated November 4, 2016. Flood Plain Management Zoning Overlay District I-394 Overlay Zoning District (A, B, & C) Shoreland Overlay District See Section on Shoreland Managementfor setback distance from protected waters. A (R-1) Single-Family Residential (R-4) High Density Residential (R-3) Medium Density Residential (R-2) Moderate Density Residential (MU-N) Mixed Use Neighborhood (MU-C) Mixed Use Community (MU-E) Mixed Use Employment Uses in the Light Industrial Zoning District Principal Uses. The following principal uses shall be permitted within the Light Industrial Zoning District: (1) Offices (2) Warehouses (3) Wholesale-retail distribution centers (4) Electronics manufacturing (5) Food packaging and processing; provided, however, that no processing shall involve any cooking, heating, smoking, soaking, or marinating procedures (6) Assembly and/or fabricating exclusive of sheet metal or steel fabricating, foundries, and similar uses except for the fabricating of sheet metal as it is used for the heating, ventilation, and air conditioning business (7) Other light manufacturing uses that would not constitute a nuisance or health hazard to surrounding or adjacent residential or commercial districts (8) Essential services, Class I and Class III (9) Temporary retail sales in accordance with this section (10) Sexually oriented businesses (11) Breweries (limited and associated retail use such as merchandise related to the brewery may be sold) (12) Taprooms that occupy up to 50 percent of the gross floor area of the brewery (limited and associated retail use such as merchandise related to the brewery may be sold in the taproom) (13) Micro-distilleries (limited and associated retail use such as merchandise related to the microdistillery may be sold); and (14) Cocktail rooms that occupy up to 50 percent of the gross floor area of the microdistillery (limited and associated retail use such as merchandise related to the microdistillery may be sold in the cocktail room). Restricted Uses. The following restricted uses shall be permitted within the Light Industrial Zoning District: (1) Sale or repair of firearms, provided the following restrictions are observed: a. The facility shall be located not less than 750 feet from any property zoned Institutional or any property zoned Mixed Use that allows Institutional uses, as measured at the lot line. The facility shall be located not less than 750 feet from any property zoned Institutional in any city adjoining Golden Valley, as measured at the lot line. b. The facility shall be located not less than 375 feet from any property zoned Residential or any property zoned Mixed Use that allows Residential uses, as measured at the lot line. The facility shall be located not less than 750 feet from any property zoned Residential in any city adjoining Golden Valley, as measured at the lot line. c. The facility shall be located not less than 750 feet from any of the following conditional uses: i. Ball fields and other recreational facilities ii. Child care centers iii. Health, fitness, and/or exercise facilities, include dance studios, gymnastics training, weight lifting studios, aerobic exercise, and gymnasiums iv. Trade schools or training centers; and v. Adult day care centers. a. The facility shall be located not less than 1,000 feet from another firearm facility, as measured at the lot line. b. In the case of a multi-use building, distances from the firearm facility shall be measured from the portion of the structure occupied by the facility. c. All facilities shall meet applicable federal and state security standards including, but not limited to, Minn. Stats. § 624.7161 and Minnesota Rules Chapter 7504 as amended from time to time. d. No firearms or ammunition shall be displayed in windows. Windows must be of clear, transparent glass and be free of obstructions for at least three feet into the facility. e. In-vehicle sales or repair are prohibited and no firearm-related uses shall be allowed in a trailer or other nonpermanent building. Conditional Uses. The following uses may be allowed as conditional uses after review by the Planning Commission and approval by the City Council in accordance with the standards and procedures set forth in this chapter: (1) Building materials yards (including inside and outside storage) (2) Public garages for repairing and storing motor vehicles (3) Laundries and dry-cleaning plants (4) Animal hospitals where domestic animals are received for treatment, care, and cure by a duly licensed veterinarian (5) Ball fields and other recreation facilities (6) Research and development laboratories and pilot plant operations incidental thereto (7) Greenhouses with no outside storage, including an outside growing area no larger than the greenhouse building area. Retail sales may be permitted only where located inside and incidental to a wholesale business (8) Packaging and/or bottling of soft drinks or dairy products (9) Bakeries (commercial-wholesale) (10) Child care centers, provided that said facilities serve only dependents of persons employed on the same premises as are otherwise permitted by this chapter (11) Health, fitness, and/or exercise facilities, including dance studios, gymnastics training, weight lifting studios, aerobic exercise, and gymnasiums (12) Heliports (13) Food packaging and processing that involves cooking, heating, smoking, soaking, or marinating procedures (14) Child care centers (15) Truck/van terminals (16) Medical clinics (17) Trade schools or training centers (18) Adult day care center (19) Drive-through bank facilities with frontage on a collector or minor arterial street (20) Accessory retail services and/or sales incidental to a permitted use, conducted in an area less than 10 percent of the building's gross floor area (21) Recycling drop-off facilities (22) Recycling facilities (23) Taprooms that occupy 50 percent or more of the gross floor area of the brewery (limited and associated retail use such as merchandise related to the brewery may be sold in the taproom) (24) Cocktail rooms that occupy 50 percent or more of the gross floor area of the microdistillery (limited and associated retail use such as merchandise related to the microdistillery may be sold in the cocktail room) (25) Principal or conditional uses in buildings taller than 45 feet in height; and (26) Surface lot storage of automobile sales inventory. Prohibited Uses. The following uses shall be prohibited within the Light Industrial Zoning District: (1) Firing ranges. Golden Valley City Council Meeting December 7, 2021 Agenda Item 4. C. 3. Continuation of Public Hearing – Preliminary Plan for Subdivision for 6300 Olson Memorial Highway Prepared By Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager Summary United Properties is proposing three planning actions to allow for the redevelopment of 6300 Olson Memorial Highway. They are requesting a change to the Future Land Use Map (from Office use to Light Industrial use), a change to the Zoning Map (from the Office Zoning District to the Light Industrial Zoning District), and a subdivision of the property to create two new lots (one north, one south). These changes would require that the existing building be demolished and would allow for the construction of two new office/warehouse buildings as part of a new business center. At its meeting on October 25, the Planning Commission voted (5-0) to recommend approval of the subdivision. This item was tabled at the November 16 City Council meeting. Background and Existing Conditions For details on the background of this rezoning request and the existing conditions of the site itself, please refer to the attached staff memo to the Planning Commission. Proposal The proposed subdivision request would divide the existing lot into two separate lots. Required Process Support from the City Council for this proposal would also necessitate review and approval from the Metropolitan Council for the change in land use, requiring a delay in the final vote on the rezoning and the subdivision until the land use change was approved. Staff Review Because the proposed two-lot subdivision is not part of a recorded plat or a recorded registered land survey, it does not qualify as a minor subdivision and therefore must proceed under the more general subdivision process identified in the City Code (Sec. 109). The applicant has submitted all of the information required to process the request, including a site survey of existing conditions, a tree inventory, and a preliminary plat. City Council Regular Meeting Executive Summary City of Golden Valley December 7, 2021 2 The existing lot area is 30.7 acres. Lot 1, proposed to be to the north, would encompass 586,299 square feet (13.5 acres). Lot 2, to the south, would encompass 634,635 square feet (14.6 acres). An additional 116,254 square feet (2.7 acres) would be dedicated as right-of-way – this is land that is currently in a roadway easement beneath Douglas Drive. If the property were to be rezoned to Light Industrial, as proposed, there would be no minimum lot area requirements (as there are in many residential zoning districts). There would also be no minimum lot width requirements. Therefore, the proposed subdivision would meet all dimensional requirements of the zoning district. Given the large size of the existing and proposed lots, there would be sufficient building envelopes for development. Consistent with the requirements of Sec. 109-167 of the City Code, the City may require a reasonable portion of the proposed subdivision to be dedicated to the public for public use as a park, playground, public open space, etc. Alternatively, a park dedication fee may be contributed in lieu of land. The City’s adopted fee schedule sets this rate at 6% of the current land value. This fee may only be used for future acquisition of land for other public use. Necessary Transportation Improvements As identified in Chapter 4 of the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan, this site has been identified as a target location to provide a needed local street connection between Country Club Drive and the signalized intersection at Douglas Drive: Country Club Dr/Frontage Rd Extension As part of the Douglas Dr project, direct access from Country Club Dr to Douglas Dr north of Hwy 55 was eliminated as a safety improvement. The access was realigned to operate as a right-in/right-out between Country Club Dr and Hwy 55. To improve local street connectivity, it is desirable to extend Country Club Dr north to join the existing signalized intersection of Douglas Dr and the North Hwy 55 Frontage Rd east of Douglas Dr. This would require acquisition of right-of-way from the currently vacant site in the northwest quadrant of Hwy 55 and Douglas Dr. (Golden Valley 2040 Comprehensive Plan, Chapter 4: Transportation, pages 4-34 and 4-35) This also falls under one of the chapter’s listed implementation actions for Goal 2: Improve the Functionality and Safety of the Road Network: “Review redevelopment proposals for opportunities to implement roadway improvements, monitor traffic impacts, implement access management strategies, and resolve safety deficiencies.” (Golden Valley 2040 Comprehensive Plan, Chapter 4: Transportation, page 4-45) In light of this, Engineering staff have identified the need for right-of-way to be dedicated through the site in order to provide land for construction of a future public road. Staff considered various layouts and alternatives, but determined that best option for locating this right-of-way is east/west between the two proposed lots (in the area currently identified as shared private access for the two buildings) in order to align with the signalized intersection at Douglas Drive. City Council Regular Meeting Executive Summary City of Golden Valley December 7, 2021 3 While no timing or funding for this road have been identified in the City’s 10 year Capital Improvement Program, staff believes the proposed subdivision of the property (along with the demolition of the existing structure) provides perhaps the only opportunity in the foreseeable future to position the City to complete this missing piece in the transportation network. For the time being, an east/west right-of-way that does not complete the connection is satisfactory to absorb traffic associated with the redevelopment of 6300 Olson Memorial Highway. If and when other developments are proposed in the area, such as within the Golden Valley Country Club driving range, additional analysis will be needed to determine if the impacts rise to a level that requires the acquisition of right-of-way for a north/south segment and completion of the frontage road. Dedication of land at 6300 Olson Memorial Highway for this future right-of-way is included as a conditional of approval for the final plat. Additional Department Review Engineering staff have reviewed the preliminary plat and, in addition to the public road, note that additional drainage and utility easements will be needed on the final plat. This has been listed as a condition of approval. The Fire Department has also reviewed the application and supports the dedication of land through the site for a future right-of-way in order to improve public safety response times. Review by the Minnesota Department of Transportation and by Hennepin County is required due to the adjacency of their rights-of-way to this property. Hennepin Country Transportation staff have provided their support for the dedicated right-of-way while also asking for modifications to the proposed access points along Douglas Drive. Those items would be addressed as part of site design review and approval in advance of construction. Evaluation of Preliminary Plat According to Section 109-67 of the City Code, the following are the regulations governing approval of preliminary plats for subdivisions: Factor/Finding 1. The Council may require changes or revisions as it deems necessary for the health, safety, general welfare, and convenience of the City. Standard conditionally met. In order to advance the long-term transportation network concept included in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, land must be dedicated for a future public road and included on the final plat. 2. The approval of a preliminary plat is tentative only, involving only the general acceptability of the layout as submitted. Standard conditionally met. Staff have reviewed the layout and find it to be generally acceptable. Additional drainage and utility easements must be added to the final plat, including City Council Regular Meeting Executive Summary City of Golden Valley December 7, 2021 4 an easement over floodplain and wetland areas. As the site is adjacent to both State and County right-of-way, other comments from these jurisdictions may be incorporated into the final plat. 3. Prior to approval of the preliminary plat by the Council, the engineering proposals pertaining to water supply, storm drainage, sanitary sewer service, roadway widths, traffic impacts, and the surfacing of streets shall be approved by the City engineer and other public officials having jurisdiction. Standard met. While the specifics of the site design remain to be fully developed as part of the submittals for the potential site redevelopment, there are no known issues related to water supply, storm drainage, sanitary sewer service, or traffic impacts. 4. No plat shall be approved for a subdivision which covers an area subject to periodic flooding or which contains extremely poor drainage facilities and which would make adequate drainage of the streets and lots difficult or impossible, unless the subdivider agrees to make improvements which will, in the opinion of the City Engineer, make the area completely safe for occupancy and provide adequate street and lot drainage. Standard met. The City Engineer has determined that the site should drain adequately. 5. No plat shall be approved for a subdivision that does not meet the requirements specified in this chapter. Standard met. Financial Or Budget Considerations No short-term impacts, though the recommended dedication of land for a future public road provides the possibility of future expenditures for construction. Recommended Action At the appropriate time, staff will recommend approval of the proposed Preliminary Plan for Subdivision for 6300 Olson Memorial Highway (Golden Valley Business Center) subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall work with staff to dedicate land through the site sufficient to provide right-of-way for a future public road. 2. The applicant shall include on the final plat the dedication of all drainage and utility easements deemed necessary to meet City Code requirements (including floodplain and wetland areas). 3. Any comments from the Minnesota Department of Transportation or Hennepin County shall be incorporated into the final plat. 4. A park dedication fee of $519,180 (or 6% of the land value) shall be paid prior to the release of the final plat. 5. The City Attorney will determine if a title review is necessary prior to approval of the final plat. City Council Regular Meeting Executive Summary City of Golden Valley December 7, 2021 5 In order to be consistent with the adopted 2040 Comprehensive Plan, the City should wait to act on this item until the Metropolitan Council has approved the recent Comprehensive Plan amendment reguiding this property to Light Industrial use. Motion to table the consideration of the Preliminary Plan for Subdivision for 6300 Olson Memorial Highway until the change in land use has been reviewed by the Metropolitan Council. Supporting Documents • Memo to the Planning Commission dated October 25, 2021 (4 pages) • Preliminary Plat (3 pages) • Rendering of Proposed South Building (1 page) • Letter from Hennepin County (6 pages) • Email from Golden Valley Country Club (1 page) 1 Date: October 25, 2021 To: Golden Valley Planning Commission From: Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager Subject: Informal Public Hearing – Preliminary Plan for Subdivision of 6300 Olson Memorial Highway Summary of Request United Properties is proposing three planning actions to allow for the redevelopment of 6300 Olson Memorial Highway. They are requesting a change to the Future Land Use Map (from Office use to Light Industrial use), a change to the Zoning Map (from the Office Zoning District to the Light Industrial Zoning District), and a subdivision of the property to create two new lots (one north, one south). These changes would require that the existing building be demolished and would allow for the construction of two new office/warehouse buildings as part of a new business center. Background and Existing Conditions For details on the background of this subdivision request and the existing conditions of the site itself, please refer to the accompanying memo on the proposed change in guided land use. Proposal The proposed subdivision request would divide the existing lot into two separate lots. Required Process Support from the Planning Commission and City Council for this proposal would also necessitate review and approval from the Metropolitan Council for the change in land use, requiring a delay in the final vote on the rezoning and the subdivision until the land use change was approved. Staff Review Because the proposed two-lot subdivision is not part of a recorded plat or a recorded registered land survey, it does not qualify as a minor subdivision and therefore must proceed under the more general subdivision process identified in the City Code (Sec. 109). The applicant has submitted all of the information required to process the request, including a site survey of existing conditions, a tree inventory, and a preliminary plat. 2 The existing lot area is 30.7 acres. Lot 1, proposed to be to the north, would encompass 586,299 square feet (13.5 acres). Lot 2, to the south, would encompass 634,635 square feet (14.6 acres). An additional 116,254 square feet (2.7 acres) would be dedicated as right-of-way – this is land that is currently in a roadway easement beneath Douglas Drive. If the property were to be rezoned to Light Industrial, as proposed, there would be no minimum lot area requirements (as there are in many residential zoning districts). There would also be no minimum lot width requirements. Therefore, the proposed subdivision would meet all dimensional requirements of the zoning district. Given the large size of the existing and proposed lots, there would be sufficient building envelopes for development. Consistent with the requirements of Sec. 109-167 of the City Code, the City may require a reasonable portion of the proposed subdivision to be dedicated to the public for public use as a park, playground, public open space, etc. Alternatively, a park dedication fee may be contributed in lieu of land. The City’s adopted fee schedule sets this rate at 6% of the current land value. This fee may only be used for future acquisition of land for other public use. Necessary Transportation Improvements As identified in Chapter 4 of the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan, this site has been identified as a target location to provide a needed local street connection between Country Club Drive and the signalized intersection at Douglas Drive: Country Club Dr/Frontage Rd Extension As part of the Douglas Dr project, direct access from Country Club Dr to Douglas Dr north of Hwy 55 was eliminated as a safety improvement. The access was realigned to operate as a right-in/right-out between Country Club Dr and Hwy 55. To improve local street connectivity, it is desirable to extend Country Club Dr north to join the existing signalized intersection of Douglas Dr and the North Hwy 55 Frontage Rd east of Douglas Dr. This would require acquisition of right-of-way from the currently vacant site in the northwest quadrant of Hwy 55 and Douglas Dr. (Golden Valley 2040 Comprehensive Plan, Chapter 4: Transportation, pages 4-34 and 4-35) This also falls under one of the chapter’s listed implementation actions for Goal 2: Improve the Functionality and Safety of the Road Network: “Review redevelopment proposals for opportunities to implement roadway improvements, monitor traffic impacts, implement access management strategies, and resolve safety deficiencies.” (Golden Valley 2040 Comprehensive Plan, Chapter 4: Transportation, page 4-45) In light of this, Engineering staff have identified the need for right-of-way to be dedicated through the site in order to provide land for construction of a future public road. Staff considered various layouts and alternatives, but determined that best option for locating this right-of-way is east/west 3 between the two proposed lots (in the area currently identified as shared private access for the two buildings) in order to align with the signalized intersection at Douglas Drive. While no timing or funding for this road have been identified in the City’s 10 year Capital Improvement Program, staff believes the proposed subdivision of the property (along with the demolition of the existing structure) provides perhaps the only opportunity in the foreseeable future to position the City to complete this missing piece in the transportation network. For the time being, an east/west right-of-way that does not complete the connection is satisfactory to absorb traffic associated with the redevelopment of 6300 Olson Memorial Highway. If and when other developments are proposed in the area, such as within the Golden Valley Country Club driving range, additional analysis will be needed to determine if the impacts rise to a level that requires the acquisition of right-of-way for a north/south segment and completion of the frontage road. Dedication of land at 6300 Olson Memorial Highway for this future right-of-way is included as a conditional of approval for the final plat. Additional Department Review Engineering staff have reviewed the preliminary plat and, in addition to the public road, note that additional drainage and utility easements will be needed on the final plat. This has been listed as a condition of approval. Review by the Minnesota Department of Transportation and by Hennepin County is required due to the adjacency of their rights-of-way to this property. Additional comments by these jurisdictions may require further adjustments to the final plat. The Fire Department has also reviewed the application and supports the dedication of land through the site for a future right-of-way in order to improve public safety response times. Evaluation of Preliminary Plat According to Section 109-67 of the City Code, the following are the regulations governing approval of preliminary plats for subdivisions: Factor/Finding 1. The Council may require changes or revisions as it deems necessary for the health, safety, general welfare, and convenience of the City. Standard conditionally met. In order to advance the long-term transportation network concept included in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, land must be dedicated for a future public road and included on the final plat. 2. The approval of a preliminary plat is tentative only, involving only the general acceptability of the layout as submitted. 4 Standard conditionally met. Staff have reviewed the layout and find it to be generally acceptable. Additional drainage and utility easements must be added to the final plat, including an easement over floodplain and wetland areas. As the site is adjacent to both State and County right-of-way, other comments from these jurisdictions may be incorporated into the final plat. 3. Prior to approval of the preliminary plat by the Council, the engineering proposals pertaining to water supply, storm drainage, sanitary sewer service, roadway widths, traffic impacts, and the surfacing of streets shall be approved by the City engineer and other public officials having jurisdiction. Standard met. While the specifics of the site design remain to be fully developed as part of the submittals for the potential site redevelopment, there are no known issues related to water supply, storm drainage, sanitary sewer service, or traffic impacts. 4. No plat shall be approved for a subdivision which covers an area subject to periodic flooding or which contains extremely poor drainage facilities and which would make adequate drainage of the streets and lots difficult or impossible, unless the subdivider agrees to make improvements which will, in the opinion of the City Engineer, make the area completely safe for occupancy and provide adequate street and lot drainage. Standard met. The City Engineer has determined that the site should drain adequately. 5. No plat shall be approved for a subdivision that does not meet the requirements specified in this chapter. Standard met. Recommended Action Based on the findings above, staff recommends approval of the proposed preliminary plat for 6300 Olson Memorial Highway (Golden Valley Business Center) subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall work with staff to dedicate land through the site sufficient to provide right- of-way for a future public road. 2. The applicant shall include on the final plat the dedication of all drainage and utility easements deemed necessary to meet City Code requirements (including floodplain and wetland areas). 3. Any comments from the Minnesota Department of Transportation or Hennepin County shall be incorporated into the final plat. 4. A park dedication fee of $519,180 (or 6% of the land value) shall be paid prior to the release of the final plat. 5. The City Attorney will determine if a title review is necessary prior to approval of the final plat. Attachments Preliminary Plat (3 pages) Rendering of Proposed South Building (1 page) Email from Golden Valley Country Club (1 page) Hennepin County Transportation Project Delivery Public Works Facility, 1600 Prairie Drive, Medina, MN 55340 612-596-0300 | hennepin.us November 9, 2021 Mr. Jason Zimmerman City of Golden Valley 7800 Golden Valley Road Golden Valley, MN 55427 Re: Preliminary and Final Plat Review – United Properties (Received 10/25/21) County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 102 (Douglas Drive) Hennepin County Plat Review ID #3962 (Reviewed 11/02/21) Mr. Zimmerman: Please consider the following county staff comments for the subdivision and redevelopment of 6300 Olson Memorial Highway into two lots with a new business center. Access: The county supports the current access to the signalized Olson Memorial Highway North Frontage Road/Douglas Drive intersection and the city’s planned public east-west roadway connection to Country Club Drive (not shown on the plat). Since the proposed partial access driveways on Douglas Drive do not meet the county’s access spacing guidelines, county staff do not support either access due to safety and operations concerns. In addition, county staff recommend internal parking lot revisions to allow additional space for eastbound queueing and westbound parking lot circulation immediately west of the Douglas Drive access. Right-of-way: The county supports the city’s request for right of way dedication and/or easements along Douglas Drive to provide the rights necessary to own and maintain the roadway and regional trail. Storm Water/Drainage: Ensure discharge rates remain less than existing flow rates. The county storm water system will not take water from new drainage areas. Additional treatments may be necessary if flow rates cannot match existing. Contact: Eric Vogel at 612-596-0316 or eric.vogel2@hennepin.us. Permits: Inform the developer that all construction within county right of way requires an approved Hennepin County permit prior to construction. This includes, but is not limited to, driveway and street access, drainage and utility construction, trail development, and landscaping. The county will not issue decisions on such right of way permits until after the city’s final plat approval process is complete. Contact: Michael Olmstead, Permits Supervisor at 612-596-0336 or michael.olmstead@hennepin.us Hennepin County Transportation Project Delivery Public Works Facility, 1600 Prairie Drive, Medina, MN 55340 612-596-0300 | hennepin.us More Information: Please contact Jason Gottfried: 612-596-0394, jason.gottfried@hennepin.us for any further discussion of these items. Sincerely, Carla Stueve, PE County Highway Engineer He nn e pin Cou n ty P ro perty Ma p Da te : 10 /22/2 021 Comm en ts: 1 inc h = 4 00 fee t PAR CEL ID: 32 118 21140 00 3 OWN ER N AME: G olde n Valle y I nvesto rs Llc PAR CEL AD DRESS: 6 300 O lso n Memo ria l H wy, G old en Valle y MN 5 54 27 PAR CEL AR EA: 28 .03 ac r es , 1,2 21,0 33 sq ft A-T-B: To rr ens SAL E PR ICE: $34 ,2 81 ,8 24 SAL E D ATA: 0 3/20 04 SAL E C OD E: Exclu de d Fro m Ra tio Stud ies ASSESSED 20 20 , PAYABLE 202 1 PROPERT Y TYPE: C omme rcial-Pr efer re d H OM ESTEAD : N on -H ome stea d M AR KET VAL UE: $13 ,500 ,0 00 TAX TO TAL: $4 78,27 1.96 ASSESSED 20 21 , PAYABLE 202 2 PRO PER TY TYPE: C omm erc ial HO MESTEAD: No n-h ome ste ad MARKET VALU E: $1 3,50 0,00 0 This data (i) is fur nish ed 'A S IS' wit h no represent at ion as t o com ple ten ess or acc urac y ; (ii) is furnis hed w it h n o war rant y of an y k ind; an d (ii i) is not sui tab le for lega l, engi neering or surv ey ing purposes . Hen nepin County s hall not be l iable fo r a ny damage, in jury or los s re sul ting f rom this dat a. COP YRIG HT © H EN N EPIN COU N TY 20 2 1 1418920181818181817171881717161614141418181818181818920NO PARKINGNO PARKINGNO PARKING NO PARKINGNO PARKINGNO PARKINGNO PARKINGNO PARKINGNO PARKINGNO PARKINGN78°44' 0 5 " W 329.98 35 FT PARKING ANDBUILDING SETBACK10 FT PARKING SETBACK20 FT BUILDING SETBACK10 FT PARKING SETBACK20 FT BUILDING SETBACK35 FT PARKING AND BUILDING SETBACK10 FT PARKING SETBACK20 FT BUILDING SETBACKPROPOSEDBUILDING 1182,000 SFFFE: 889.00DOUGLAS DRIVEPROPOSEDBUILDING 2 217,000 SFFFE: 892.16COUNTRY CLUB DRIV E DOUGLAS DRIVEGOLDEN VALLEY GOLFRIGHT OF WAYCHICAGO NORTHWESTERN RAILROADRIGHT OF WAY20 FTTRANSMISSION LINE EASEMENT50 FT WIDE STREET ANDHIGHWAY EASEMENT14 FT WIDE TRAILEASEMENT35 FT PARKING ANDBUILDING SETBACKN0°24'11"E271.00'ADAADA ADA ADA ADAADA ADAADA ADA ADA ADA ADA ADAADAADAADA ADAADA ADAADAADAADASEE SHEET C304 -ADA ENLARGEMENT 1SEE SHEET C304 -ADA ENLARGEMENT 2SEE SHEET C304 -ADA ENLARGEMENT 4SEE SHEET C304 -ADA ENLARGEMENT 3PROPOSED LOT LINEN89°35'49"W 880.29'PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTERPROPERTY LINEPROPOSED FENCESETBACK LINERETAINING WALLPROPOSED STANDARD DUTY ASPHALTPROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENTPROPOSED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AREAPROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALKLEGENDPROPOSED HEAVY DUTY ASPHALTPROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BYCHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:NOT FORCONSTRUCTION160576021ER/ANDDGOLDEN VALLEYBUSINESS CENTERGOLDEN VALLEYBUSINESS CENTERGOLDEN VALLEY, MNNo.DescriptionDate2021 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE: 651-645-4197 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM © This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.\\twcfp01\MW_TWC\TWC_LDEV\United_Properties\GOLDEN VALLEY INDUSTRIAL\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\C3-SITE PLAN.dwg September 23, 2021 - 8:27pm SITE PLAN NOTES1.ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL CITY/COUNTY REGULATIONSAND CODES AND O.S.H.A. STANDARDS.2.CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACTLOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF VESTIBULES, SLOPE PAVING, SIDEWALKS, EXITPORCHES, TRUCK DOCKS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND EXACT BUILDINGUTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS.3.ALL INNER CURBED RADII ARE TO BE <3'> AND OUTER CURBED RADII ARE TO BE<10'> UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. STRIPED RADII ARE TO BE 5'.4.ALL DIMENSIONS AND RADII ARE TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISENOTED.5.EXISTING STRUCTURES WITHIN CONSTRUCTION LIMITS ARE TO BE ABANDONED,REMOVED OR RELOCATED AS NECESSARY. ALL COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASEBID.6.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL RELOCATIONS, (UNLESSOTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANS) INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ALL UTILITIES,STORM DRAINAGE, SIGNS, TRAFFIC SIGNALS & POLES, ETC. AS REQUIRED. ALLWORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNING AUTHORITIES REQUIREMENTSAND PROJECT SITE WORK SPECIFICATIONS AND SHALL BE APPROVED BY SUCH. ALLCOST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASE BID.7.SITE BOUNDARY, TOPOGRAPHY, UTILITY AND ROAD INFORMATION TAKEN FROM ASURVEY BY EGAN, FIELD & NOWAK, INC, DATED 08/18/2021.KIMLEY-HORN ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR ANY ERRORS, INACCURACIES, OROMISSIONS CONTAINED THEREIN.8.TOTAL LAND AREA IS <30.7> ACRES WITHOUT R.O.W. PURPOSES 28.03 ACRES.9.PYLON / MONUMENT SIGNS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED BY OTHERS. SIGNS ARESHOWN FOR GRAPHICAL & INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. CONTRACTOR TOVERIFY SIZE, LOCATION AND ANY REQUIRED PERMITS NECESSARY FOR THECONSTRUCTION OF THE PYLON / MONUMENT SIGN.10.CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE ARCH / MEP PLANS FOR SITE LIGHTING ANDELECTRICAL PLAN.11.NO PROPOSED LANDSCAPING SUCH AS TREES OR SHRUBS, ABOVE ANDUNDERGROUND STRUCTURES, OR OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS SHALL BE LOCATEDWITHIN EXISTING OR PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY UNLESSSPECIFICALLY NOTED ON PLANS OTHERWISE.12.REFERENCE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DETAILS.13.REFER TO FINAL PLAT OR ALTA SURVEY FOR EXACT LOT AND PROPERTYBOUNDARY DIMENSIONS.14.ALL AREAS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST SQUARE FOOT.15.ALL DIMENSIONS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST TENTH FOOT.16.ALL PARKING STALLS TO BE <9'> IN WIDTH AND <18.5'> IN LENGTH UNLESSOTHERWISE INDICATED.17.THERE ARE <0.97> ACRES OF WETLAND IMPACTS.18.FOR OFFSITE IMPROVEMENTS, SEE THE <OFFSITE PLANS> IMPROVEMENTS PLANS.NORTH SEE SHEETC301SEE SHEETC302PROPERTY SUMMARYGOLDEN VALLEY BUSINESS CENTERTOTAL PROPERTY AREA1,337,188 SF (30.70 AC)RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION116,260 SF (2.67 AC)NET PROPERTY AREA1,220,928 SF (28.03 AC)PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA959,817 SF (22.03 AC)PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA245,889 SF (5.64 AC)TOTAL DISTURBED AREA1,205,706 SF (27.7 AC)ZONING SUMMARYEXISTING ZONINGOFFICEPROPOSED ZONINGLIGHT INDUSTRIALPARKING SETBACKSSIDE/REAR = 10' ROAD = 35'BUILDING SETBACKSFRONT = 35' SIDE = 20'REAR = 20'C301 OVERALL SITEPLANKEYNOTE LEGENDCONCRETE SIDEWALK6" CONCRETE FILLED PIPE BOLLARDMATCH EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT/ CURB & GUTTERACCESSIBLE CURB RAMPACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGNACCESSIBLE PARKINGAREA STRIPED WITH 4" SYSL @ 45° 2' O.C.STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENTLANDSCAPE AREA - SEE LANDSCAPE PLANSHEAVY DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENTHEAVY DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENTB612 CURB & GUTTER (TYP.)TRANSITION CURBFLAT CURBCOMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY APRONCONCRETE RETAINING WALL- 12" WIDECONCRETE V-GUTTER- 24" WIDEABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQ 14171714141418181818181818920NO PARKINGNO PARKINGNO PARKINGNO PARKINGNO PARKING10 FT PARKING SETBACK20 FT BUILDING SETBACKIIIIJJJKCCIIIIIIIIIIIIIAAEEFAAIIAIR5.0'R5.0'R15.0'R15.0'50.0'59.0'42.5' 10.0' 700.0' 10.0' 61.0'61.0'12.0'260.0'60.0'60.0'20.0'40.0'20.0'145.1'24.0'24.0' 20.0'654.0'20.0'HHHH9.0'24.0' 24.0'R15.7531.5'120.0'KI24.0'31.5'20.0'654.0'20.0'31.5'24.0'R15.0'43.0'126.0'9.0'126.0'162.0'9.0'162.0'34.0'162.0'9.0'162.0' 24.0' 29.0'40.0'R5.0'R3.0'PROPOSEDBUILDING 1182,000 SFFFE: 889.00DOUGLAS DRIVEGOLDEN VALLEY GOLFRIGHT OF WAYCHICAGO NORTHWESTERN RAILROADRIGHT OF WAY DOUGLAS DRIVEGOLDEN VALLEY GOLFRIGHT OF WAYCHICAGO NORTHWESTERN RAILROADRIGHT OF WAYR39.0'AATYP.GFGF9.0'18.5'TYP.TYP.TYP.TYP.TYP.TYP.R15.0'ITYP.44.5'316.0'TYP.TYP.TYP.316.0'44.5'TYP.55.0'DDER5.0'R25.0'R25.0'R12.5'R5.0'R5.0'R25.0'R5.0'R25.0'R25.0'R5.0'R25.0'R5.0'R25.0'R5.0'R15.75R25.0'R12.5'R15.75R15.7543.0'N0°24'11"E271.00'R5.0'R15.0'TYP.R3.0'R3.0'R3.0'R3.0'R5.0'R5.0'R5.0'R3.0'R3.0'R3.0'R15.0'R5.0'R5.0'TYP.TYP.TYP.TYP.R5.0'TYP.R5.0'TYP.R3.0'R3.0'R3.0'R3.0'48.33'40.0'40.0'104.6'PQPQ16.6'96.8'181.3'TYP.25.0'29.5'PROPOSED R.O.W.PROPOSED R.O.W.PROPOSED R.O.W.GFDDGFGFFEEEEN89°35'49"W 880.29'R15.0'PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTERPROPERTY LINEPROPOSED FENCESETBACK LINERETAINING WALLPROPOSED STANDARD DUTY ASPHALTPROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENTPROPOSED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AREAPROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALKLEGENDPROPOSED HEAVY DUTY ASPHALTPROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BYCHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:NOT FORCONSTRUCTION160576021ER/ANDDGOLDEN VALLEYBUSINESS CENTERGOLDEN VALLEYBUSINESS CENTERGOLDEN VALLEY, MNNo.DescriptionDate2021 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE: 651-645-4197 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.\\twcfp01\MW_TWC\TWC_LDEV\United_Properties\GOLDEN VALLEY INDUSTRIAL\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\C3-SITE PLAN.dwg September 23, 2021 - 8:27pm SITE PLAN NOTES1.ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL CITY/COUNTY REGULATIONSAND CODES AND O.S.H.A. STANDARDS.2.CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACTLOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF VESTIBULES, SLOPE PAVING, SIDEWALKS, EXITPORCHES, TRUCK DOCKS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND EXACT BUILDINGUTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS.3.ALL INNER CURBED RADII ARE TO BE <3'> AND OUTER CURBED RADII ARE TO BE<10'> UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. STRIPED RADII ARE TO BE 5'.4.ALL DIMENSIONS AND RADII ARE TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISENOTED.5.EXISTING STRUCTURES WITHIN CONSTRUCTION LIMITS ARE TO BE ABANDONED,REMOVED OR RELOCATED AS NECESSARY. ALL COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASEBID.6.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL RELOCATIONS, (UNLESSOTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANS) INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ALL UTILITIES,STORM DRAINAGE, SIGNS, TRAFFIC SIGNALS & POLES, ETC. AS REQUIRED. ALLWORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNING AUTHORITIES REQUIREMENTSAND PROJECT SITE WORK SPECIFICATIONS AND SHALL BE APPROVED BY SUCH. ALLCOST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASE BID.7.SITE BOUNDARY, TOPOGRAPHY, UTILITY AND ROAD INFORMATION TAKEN FROM ASURVEY BY EGAN, FIELD & NOWAK, INC, DATED 08/18/2021.KIMLEY-HORN ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR ANY ERRORS, INACCURACIES, OROMISSIONS CONTAINED THEREIN.8.TOTAL LAND AREA IS <30.7> ACRES WITHOUT R.O.W. PURPOSES 28.03 ACRES.9.PYLON / MONUMENT SIGNS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED BY OTHERS. SIGNS ARESHOWN FOR GRAPHICAL & INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. CONTRACTOR TOVERIFY SIZE, LOCATION AND ANY REQUIRED PERMITS NECESSARY FOR THECONSTRUCTION OF THE PYLON / MONUMENT SIGN.10.CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE ARCH / MEP PLANS FOR SITE LIGHTING ANDELECTRICAL PLAN.11.NO PROPOSED LANDSCAPING SUCH AS TREES OR SHRUBS, ABOVE ANDUNDERGROUND STRUCTURES, OR OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS SHALL BE LOCATEDWITHIN EXISTING OR PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY UNLESSSPECIFICALLY NOTED ON PLANS OTHERWISE.12.REFERENCE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DETAILS.13.REFER TO FINAL PLAT OR ALTA SURVEY FOR EXACT LOT AND PROPERTYBOUNDARY DIMENSIONS.14.ALL AREAS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST SQUARE FOOT.15.ALL DIMENSIONS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST TENTH FOOT.16.ALL PARKING STALLS TO BE <9'> IN WIDTH AND <18.5'> IN LENGTH UNLESSOTHERWISE INDICATED.17.THERE ARE <0.97> ACRES OF WETLAND IMPACTS.18.FOR OFFSITE IMPROVEMENTS, SEE THE <OFFSITE PLANS> IMPROVEMENTS PLANS.NORTH BUILDING DATA SUMMARYAREASPROPOSED PROPERTY1,220,928 SF (28.03 AC)BUILDING AREA182,000 SF (14% OF TOTALPROPERTY AREA)PARKINGREQUIRED PARKING: OFFICE(20%) WAREHOUSE (80%)146 SPACES @ 1250 36,400 SF49 SPACES @ 13000 145,600 SFTOTAL= 195 SPACESPROPOSED PARKING211 SPACES @1.31 RATIOADA STALLS REQ'D / PROVIDED7 STALLS / 7 STALLSPROPERTY SUMMARYGOLDEN VALLEY BUSINESS CENTERTOTAL PROPERTY AREA1,337,188 SF (30.70 AC)RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION116,260 SF (2.67 AC)NET PROPERTY AREA1,220,928 SF (28.03 AC)PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA959,817 SF (22.03 AC)PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA245,889 SF (5.64 AC)TOTAL DISTURBED AREA1,205,706 SF (27.7 AC)ZONING SUMMARYEXISTING ZONINGOFFICEPROPOSED ZONINGLIGHT INDUSTRIALPARKING SETBACKSSIDE/REAR = 10'ROAD = 35'BUILDING SETBACKSFRONT = 35'SIDE = 20'REAR = 20'C302 SITE PLANKEYNOTE LEGENDCONCRETE SIDEWALK6" CONCRETE FILLED PIPE BOLLARDMATCH EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT/ CURB & GUTTERACCESSIBLE CURB RAMPACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGNACCESSIBLE PARKINGAREA STRIPED WITH 4" SYSL @ 45° 2' O.C.STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENTLANDSCAPE AREA - SEE LANDSCAPE PLANSHEAVY DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENTHEAVY DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENTB612 CURB & GUTTER (TYP.)TRANSITION CURBFLAT CURBCOMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY APRONCONCRETE RETAINING WALL- 12" WIDECONCRETE V-GUTTER- 24" WIDEABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQ 189201818181818171718817171616NO PARKINGNO PARKINGNO PARKING NO PARKINGNO PARKINGN78°44' 0 5 " W 329.98I IJJIII40.0'20.0'120.0'60.0'310.0'12.0'61.0'KHIIEEAAAAAAI50.0'35.0'5.0' 0.5' 61.0' 10.0'700.0'10.0' 61.0' 24.0'31.5'20.0'654.0'20.0'31.5'24.0'R15.0'R3.0'R15.0'GFDGFGFFDIIIIIII43.0'HHHHHILHILHILCCCCCCIIO30.0'CC162.0' 9.0' 162.0'34.0'162.0' 9.0' 162.0'153.0'9.0'144.0'29.0'40.0'COUNTRY CLUB DRIV E DOUGLAS DRIVEPROPOSEDBUILDING 2 217,000 SFFFE: 892.16COUNTRY CLUB DRIV E DOUGLAS DRIVETYP.R15.0'TYP.FFGFGII18.5'9.0'IR49.0'TYP.TYP.TYP.TYP.TYP.44.5'316.0'316.0'44.5'55.0'18.5'TYP.18.5'9.0' TYP. 18.5'9.0'TYP.TYP.DDEEEEER25.0'R25.0'R12.5'R25.0'R25.0'R25.0'R5.0'R25.0'R5.0'R25.0'R25.0'R12.5'R15.75R15.7543.0'48.33'R5.0'R5.0'R5.0'R5.0'R25.0'R49.0'TYP.R3.0'R3.0'R3.0'R3.0'R5.0'R5.0'R5.0'R5.0'R3.0'R3.0'R3.0'R3.0'R5.0'R5.0'R25.0'R5.0'TYP.R5.0'TYP.TYP.TYP.TYP.TYP.102.3'35.0'24.0'QPQPQP69.3'16.7'251.0'20.0' 291.1'35.0'25.0'29.5'PROPOSED R.O.W.PROPOSED R.O.W.N89°35'49"W880.29'PROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BYCHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:NOT FORCONSTRUCTION160576021ER/ANDDGOLDEN VALLEYBUSINESS CENTERGOLDEN VALLEYBUSINESS CENTERGOLDEN VALLEY, MNNo.DescriptionDate2021 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE: 651-645-4197 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.\\twcfp01\MW_TWC\TWC_LDEV\United_Properties\GOLDEN VALLEY INDUSTRIAL\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\C3-SITE PLAN.dwg September 23, 2021 - 8:27pm BUILDING DATA SUMMARYAREASPROPOSED PROPERTY1,220,928 SF (28.03 AC)BUILDING AREA217,000 SF (17% OF TOTALPROPERTY AREA)PARKINGREQUIRED PARKING: OFFICE(20%) WAREHOUSE (80%)174 SPACES @ 1250 36,400 SF58 SPACES @ 13000 173,600 SFTOTAL= 232 SPACESPROPOSED PARKING263 SPACES @ 1.21 RATIOADA STALLS REQ'D / PROVIDED7 STALLS / 7 STALLSPROPOSED CURB AND GUTTERPROPERTY LINEPROPOSED FENCESETBACK LINERETAINING WALLPROPOSED STANDARD DUTY ASPHALTPROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENTPROPOSED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AREAPROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALKLEGENDPROPOSED HEAVY DUTY ASPHALTKEYNOTE LEGENDCONCRETE SIDEWALK6" CONCRETE FILLED PIPE BOLLARDMATCH EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT/ CURB & GUTTERACCESSIBLE CURB RAMPACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGNACCESSIBLE PARKINGAREA STRIPED WITH 4" SYSL @ 45° 2' O.C.STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENTLANDSCAPE AREA - SEE LANDSCAPE PLANSHEAVY DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENTHEAVY DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENTB612 CURB & GUTTER (TYP.)TRANSITION CURBFLAT CURBCOMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY APRONCONCRETE RETAINING WALL- 12" WIDECONCRETE V-GUTTER- 24" WIDEABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQSITE PLAN NOTES1.ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL CITY/COUNTY REGULATIONSAND CODES AND O.S.H.A. STANDARDS.2.CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACTLOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF VESTIBULES, SLOPE PAVING, SIDEWALKS, EXITPORCHES, TRUCK DOCKS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND EXACT BUILDINGUTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS.3.ALL INNER CURBED RADII ARE TO BE <3'> AND OUTER CURBED RADII ARE TO BE<10'> UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. STRIPED RADII ARE TO BE 5'.4.ALL DIMENSIONS AND RADII ARE TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISENOTED.5.EXISTING STRUCTURES WITHIN CONSTRUCTION LIMITS ARE TO BE ABANDONED,REMOVED OR RELOCATED AS NECESSARY. ALL COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASEBID.6.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL RELOCATIONS, (UNLESSOTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANS) INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ALL UTILITIES,STORM DRAINAGE, SIGNS, TRAFFIC SIGNALS & POLES, ETC. AS REQUIRED. ALLWORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNING AUTHORITIES REQUIREMENTSAND PROJECT SITE WORK SPECIFICATIONS AND SHALL BE APPROVED BY SUCH. ALLCOST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASE BID.7.SITE BOUNDARY, TOPOGRAPHY, UTILITY AND ROAD INFORMATION TAKEN FROM ASURVEY BY EGAN, FIELD & NOWAK, INC, DATED 08/18/2021.KIMLEY-HORN ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR ANY ERRORS, INACCURACIES, OROMISSIONS CONTAINED THEREIN.8.TOTAL LAND AREA IS <30.7> ACRES WITHOUT R.O.W. PURPOSES 28.03 ACRES.9.PYLON / MONUMENT SIGNS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED BY OTHERS. SIGNS ARESHOWN FOR GRAPHICAL & INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. CONTRACTOR TOVERIFY SIZE, LOCATION AND ANY REQUIRED PERMITS NECESSARY FOR THECONSTRUCTION OF THE PYLON / MONUMENT SIGN.10.CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE ARCH / MEP PLANS FOR SITE LIGHTING ANDELECTRICAL PLAN.11.NO PROPOSED LANDSCAPING SUCH AS TREES OR SHRUBS, ABOVE ANDUNDERGROUND STRUCTURES, OR OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS SHALL BE LOCATEDWITHIN EXISTING OR PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY UNLESSSPECIFICALLY NOTED ON PLANS OTHERWISE.12.REFERENCE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DETAILS.13.REFER TO FINAL PLAT OR ALTA SURVEY FOR EXACT LOT AND PROPERTYBOUNDARY DIMENSIONS.14.ALL AREAS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST SQUARE FOOT.15.ALL DIMENSIONS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST TENTH FOOT.16.ALL PARKING STALLS TO BE <9'> IN WIDTH AND <18.5'> IN LENGTH UNLESSOTHERWISE INDICATED.17.THERE ARE <0.97> ACRES OF WETLAND IMPACTS.18.FOR OFFSITE IMPROVEMENTS, SEE THE <OFFSITE PLANS> IMPROVEMENTS PLANS.NORTH PROPERTY SUMMARYGOLDEN VALLEY BUSINESS CENTERTOTAL PROPERTY AREA1,337,188 SF (30.70 AC)RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION116,260 SF (2.67 AC)NET PROPERTY AREA1,220,928 SF (28.03 AC)PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA959,817 SF (22.03 AC)PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA245,889 SF (5.64 AC)TOTAL DISTURBED AREA1,205,706 SF (27.7 AC)ZONING SUMMARYEXISTING ZONINGOFFICEPROPOSED ZONINGLIGHT INDUSTRIALPARKING SETBACKSSIDE/REAR = 10'ROAD = 35'BUILDING SETBACKSFRONT = 35'SIDE = 20'REAR = 20'C303 SITE PLAN Friday, October 22, 2021 12:56 pm Jason, Thank you and the city staff for your open discussion on the Douglas Drive / Country Club Drive road proposal. As we have discussed in recent phone calls GVCC, Golden Valley Country Club, does not support a road through GVCC’s, property. In addition, we will not support a road through the adjacent property which UPI, United Properties, currently has under contract with the owner. To be clear, GVCC, does not support any road connecting Douglas Drive to Country Club Drive. We feel any road would have a negative impact to our members, the playability of our golf course, and financially due to the cost of additional netting needed to protect a road. Please remember GVCC has been located in Golden Valley for 107 years and our long - term plans are to remain a golf course. Our current real estate projects before the city are to raise capital dollars for the clubs future improvements to the golf course and the clubhouse. In addition, please note based on our discussions to date with the City of Golden Valley and UPI, we do support UPI’s project to redevelop the Optum site provided there is no road connecting Douglas Drive to Country Club Drive. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. Respectively, Don Kovacovich General Manager Golden Valley Country Club 7001 Golden Valley Road Golden Valley, MN 55427 763.732.4111 direct 612.290.5480 cell dkovacovich@goldenvalleycountryclub.com https://www.goldenvalleycountryclub.com STORMWATEREXISTING BIKE TRAILBUILDING #1182,000 SFDOUGLAS DRIVECOUNTRY CLUB DRIVERAILROAD RIGHT OF WAYH I G H W A Y 5 5 BUILDING #2217,000 SFBUILDING ENTRANCEBUILDING ENTRANCEPLAN NORTHScale:1" = 60'-0"GOLDEN VALLEY INDUSTRIAL SITE PLAN11/19/2021SITE PLANGOLDEN VALLEY, MNTRUE NORTH Golden Valley City Council Meeting December 7, 2021 Agenda Item 6. A. First Consideration of Ordinance No. 726 Modifying the Composition of the Environmental Commission Prepared By Eric Eckman, Environmental Resources Supervisor Summary The Environmental Commission’s 2021 work plan includes an action involving community outreach and developing partnerships with local students and schools to advance environmental goals. As part of its exploration of this task, the Commission offered the idea of adding a second youth member to the Commission, similar to the City’s Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Commission and other cities’ environmental commissions (i.e. Edina, St. Louis Park). The Environmental Commission recognizes the need to include many voices and perspectives and the importance of engaging youth in discussions about the environment, climate change, and sustainability as decisions today may directly impact their future. Adding a second youth member will also further the City’s work under GreenStep Cities Best Practice Action 24.6 Resilient Economic and Community Development, Engaging the Next Generation: Engage wide representation of community youth and college students by creating opportunities to participate in city government (including commissions). The Environmental Commission recently made a recommendation to City Council to change the Commission bylaws to allow a second youth member. However, before the bylaws can be amended, the ordinance from which they are drawn must be updated. Attached is the ordinance for first consideration. Financial or Budget Considerations None Recommended Action Motion to adopt the first consideration of Ordinance No. 726 deleting in its entirety City Code Chapter 2 Administration, Article V. Boards and Commissions, Section 2-131 Environmental Commission and replacing with a new Section 2-131. City Council Regular Meeting Executive Summary City of Golden Valley December 7, 2021 2 Supporting Documents • Bylaws of the Environmental Commission (3 pages) • Section 2-131 Environmental Commission with strikethrough/underline (1 page) • Ordinance No. 726 (2 pages) BYLAWS Environmental Commission Article I: Purpose, Mission, and Duties The Environmental Commission shall be an advisory commission to the City Council on matters relating to the environment and human health. The Commission shall: •develop and make recommendations to educate the public on environmental regulations, policies, practices and tools •develop and make recommendations as an advisory review body for amendments to or revisions of the City’s Surface Water Management Plan and provide advice as requested by the Council on other city programs and initiatives •review and make recommendations regarding the city’s existing environmental ordinances, policies, and guidelines •develop and make recommendations on management practices for the City’s nature areas, public and private ponding areas, and other such city-owned properties as directed by the City Council •develop and make recommendations regarding waste reduction, recycling, and organics/composting •review and make recommendations on the City's resilience and sustainability policies and actions to adress climate variations •participate, as directed by the City Council, in local activities initiated by other public and quasi-public agencies regarding environmental issues •advise and recommend such other functions or procedures as may be assigned to them by the City Code or the Council Article II: Membership, Appointments, Terms, and Officers A.Membership The Commission shall consist of seven regular members, and one voting youth member. Regular members shall be residents of the City. Youth members shall live or attend school within Golden Valley, the Robbinsdale Area District or Hopkins School District and be enrolled in school grades 9 through 12. A vacancy shall be deemed to exist if a member ceases to meet the residency requirements. B.Appointments and Terms Appointments are made effective May 1 of each year. The Council shall appoint regular members of the Commission for three-year staggering terms. Youth members shall be appointed for a one-year term. The terms of Commission members shall be fixed and determined at the time of appointment by the governing ordinance. Emphasis in appointments will be made based on knowledge of environmental issues and their relationships to the natural environment and the quality of life in the City. The City Council shall appoint the members of the Commission and to fill vacancies for unexpired terms. C.Officers The Commission shall elect officers of Chair and Vice-Chair from the Commission membership by its voting members at its regular annual meeting, (no later than the second meeting after May 1 in each year). The Chair and Vice Chair positions rotate, and members may only serve two consecutive years as the Chair or Vice-Chair. Should the office of Chair or Vice-Chair become vacant, the Commission shall elect a successor from its membership at the next regular meeting and such election shall be for the unexpired term of said office. Officers may also delegate the duties of their position to other Commissioners as deemed appropriate by the Commission.Amended and approved June 2, 2020 BYLAWS – Environmental Commission 2 Chair responsibilities include: •work with staff liaison to develop meeting agendas •conduct and preside at all meetings in a productive and time-efficient manner •ensure the Commission conducts its activities within the stated mission and bylaws of the Commission •appoint Commissioners to subcommittees •monitor and ensure the progress of the Commission •report to the City Council Vice-Chair responsibilities: •perform the duties of the Chair in the absence or incapacity of the Chair •perform all other duties as prescribed by the Commission Article III: Meetings and Attendance A.Meetings All meetings of the Commission shall be conducted in accordance with the Minnesota Open Meeting Law and City Code. This means all business and discussion occurs at a meeting which has been posted and is open to the public. The presence of a majority of all regular members currently appointed to the Commission shall constitute a quorum for the purpose of conducting its business and exercising its powers and for all other purposes. In the event a quorum is not reached, a smaller number of members may meet to have informal discussion, however, formal action shall not be taken and must be reserved for such time as when a quorum of the Commission is reached. A quorum of the members should not discuss Commission business by email, forms of social media, telephone, or informal meetings. Commission meetings may be cancelled by the staff liaison if there are no items on the agenda for discussion. The proceedings of meeting should be conducted using standard parliamentary procedure. i.Regular Meeting The regular meeting of the Commission shall be held on the fourth Monday of the month at City Hall at 6:30 pm. The Commission may, by a majority vote, change its regular meeting dates for any reason provided proper public notice of the changed meeting is provided. ii.Annual Meeting The Annual Meeting of the commission shall be a regular meeting, typically the first meeting after May 1 of each year, at which time elections will be held. iii.Special Meetings A special meeting may be called by the Chair or whenever three members request the same in writing. Staff shall give notice to each commissioner, at least three days prior to any special meeting, of the time, place, and purpose of the meeting. Amended and approved June 2, 2020 BYLAWS – Environmental Commission 3 B.Attendance Members are expected to attend all meetings. If a member is unable to attend a meeting, they should contact the staff liaison, who will inform the chair. If a quorum cannot be attained, the meeting will be canceled. Staff liaisons will track attendance at each meeting. Each April, the City Manager’s office will review attendance records for the preceding calendar year (April-March) and send a standardized letter of warning to any member that has missed: •two consecutive or three total meetings for groups that meet once a month; or •two consecutive or five total meetings for groups that meet twice a month. Because attendance is so important to the work of the City’s boards and commissions, the City Manager may ask the member to explain the reasons for their absences. If circumstances (other than health circumstances) prevent the member from committing to consistently attend future meetings, the member may be asked to step down. If the member’s attendance does not improve after receiving a warning, the Council may take action to remove the member. Article IV: Rules A.Recordkeeping All minutes and resolutions shall be in writing and shall be kept in accordance with City procedures, Minnesota Statute and Rules regarding preservation of public records and the Minnesota Data Privacy Act. B.Work Plan The Commission will draft an annual work plan that details activities and projected timelines for the upcoming year. •The Chair may appoint Commissioners to be primarily responsible for each work plan activity. •The Commission may establish subcommittees to oversee work plan activities. The subcommittees will be chaired by Commissioners appointed by the Chair. •The Commission’s work plan will be submitted to the City Council, typically during the first quarter of the calendar year. The Chair and/or Commissioners will attend a Council/Manager meeting to discuss the annual work plan with the City Council. •The Commission’s work plan must be agreed upon by the City Council. C.Annual Report The Commission shall submit an annual report to the City Council summarizing the past year's activities. The report may highlight information the Commission feels appropriate to convey to the City Council. D.Performance of Duties Commissioners are expected to adequately prepare for meetings. Commissioners unable to complete an assigned task should notify the commission chair or subcommittee chair as soon as possible. The Commission staff liaison may ask the City Council to review a Commissioner’s appointment based upon its assessment of significant non-performance of duties. Article V: Amendments and Revisions The Commission will review these bylaws no later than the second meeting after May 1 every three years. Members may present recommendations for changes and amendments. These bylaws can be altered or amended at any regular monthly Commission meeting with a majority of members present, provided that notice of the proposed changes and amendments is provided to each member at least 10 business days before the meeting. The Council must review and approve any changes to, and has final authority regarding, these bylaws. Amended and approved June 2, 2020 Created: 2021-08-30 19:38:50 [EST] (Supp. No. 34, Update 2) Page 1 of 1 Sec. 2-131. Environmental Commission. (a) Establishment and Composition. An Environmental Commission is hereby established, composed of nine members, seven who shall serve three-year staggered terms and two youth, who shall serve a one-year term. (b) Duties and Responsibilities. It is the duty of the Environmental Commission to advise and make recommendations to the Council in matters relating to and affecting the environment and human health. Specifically, it shall: (1) Develop and make recommendations to educate the public on environmental regulations, policies, practices and tools; (2) Develop and make recommendations as an advisory review body for amendments to or revisions of the City's Surface Water Management Plan and provide advice as requested by the Council on other City programs and initiatives; (3) Review and make recommendations regarding the City's existing environmental ordinances, policies and guidelines; (4) Develop and make recommendations on management practices for the City's nature areas, public and private ponding areas, and other such City-owned properties as directed by the Council; (5) Develop and make recommendations regarding waste reduction, recycling, and organics/composting; (6) Review and make recommendations on the City's resilience and sustainability policies and actions to address climate variations; (7) Identify and advise the Council on activities initiated by other public and quasi-public agencies regarding environmental issues and participate as directed by the Council; and (8) Advise and recommend such other functions or procedures as may be assigned to them by the City Code or the Council. (Code 1988, § 2.56; Ord. No. 333, 2nd Series, 9-30-2005; Ord. No. 619 , 2nd Series, § 5, 3-21- 2017; Ord. No. 681 , § 1, 6-2-2020) Deleted: eight Deleted: one ORDINANCE NO. 726 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE Deleting Chapter 2 Administration, Article V. Boards and Commissions, Section 2-131: Environmental Commission and Replacing with a new Section 2-131: Environmental Commission The City Council for the City of Golden Valley hereby ordains as follows: Section 1. City Code Chapter 2 Administration, Article V. Boards and Commissions, Section 2-131 Environmental Commission is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: Sec. 2-131. – Environmental Commission (a)Establishment and Composition. An Environmental Commission is hereby established, composed of nine members, seven who shall serve three-year staggered terms and two youth, who shall serve a one-year term. (b)Duties and Responsibilities. It is the duty of the Environmental Commission to advise and make recommendations to the Council in matters relating to and affecting the environment and human health. Specifically, it shall: (1)Develop and make recommendations to educate the public on environmental regulations, policies, practices and tools (2)Develop and make recommendations as an advisory review body for amendments to or revisions of the City's Surface Water Management Plan and provide advice as requested by the Council on other City programs and initiatives (3)Review and make recommendations regarding the City's existing environmental ordinances, policies and guidelines (4)Develop and make recommendations on management practices for the City's nature areas, public and private ponding areas, and other such City-owned properties as directed by the Council (5)Develop and make recommendations regarding waste reduction, recycling, and organics/composting (6)Review and make recommendations on the City’s resilience and sustainability policies and actions to address climate variations (7)Identify and advise the Council on activities initiated by other public and quasi- public agencies regarding environmental issues and participate as directed by the Council; and (8)Advise and recommend such other functions or procedures as may be assigned to them by the City Code or the Council. Section 2. City Code Chapter 1 entitled “General Provisions” and Sec. 1-8 entitled “General Penalty; Continuing Violations” are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. -2- Ordinance No. 726 December 21, 2021 Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law. Adopted by the City Council this 21st day of December, 2021. Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: Theresa Schyma, City Clerk Golden Valley City Council Meeting December 7, 2021 Agenda Item 6. B. First Consideration of Ordinance No. 727, Public Land Disposition Procedure Prepared By Myles Campbell, Planner Cherie Shoquist-Henderson, Housing and Economic Development Manager Maria Cisneros, City Attorney Kiarra Zackery, Equity and Inclusion Manager Summary In 2019, City Council directed staff to pursue a Capacity Building Grant from the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency to assist with a potential project regarding vacant ROW and highway turnback parcels. As part of that project, the City committed to considering a Public Land Disposition Policy – language that would help direct decision-making by elected officials as to the use of publicly owned property. The policy was discussed with the City Council in June, when they received the accompanying community engagement report. At that meeting, staff and Council Members discussed the potential to adopt a full ordinance rather than a policy, establishing the public land disposition rules as part of the City Code. A draft of the ordinance was discussed at the October 12, 2021 Council Work Session, and this proposed ordinance is the final version of that draft language. For a full description as to the intent and procedure of the public land ordinance, a copy of the Council Work Session Executive Summary is included as an attachment with this report. Ordinance Revisions Following the ordinance discussion with City Council, staff made a handful of revisions to the code language, either prompted by feedback from the Council, or during review of the ordinance with the City Attorney. • Removal of unclear “compatibility with neighborhood” requirement for site suitability o Staff’s intention here was to address cases where a site may be in conflict with an incompatible adjacent zoning designation or land use, but feel this is already addressed by the “consistent with the City’s Zoning Code” and “consistent with the City’s stated goals and policies” • Adding additional recognition in the purpose statement to other city actions regarding equity, and making clear the intent of the ordinance to address the lack of affordable housing options • Creating a procedure for the HRA to report to City Council for approval of decision regarding public lands Council/Manager Meeting Executive Summary City of Golden Valley December 7, 2021 2 • Making clearer that lands owned either by the City or HRA are eligible • Clarifying that any disposal should be done in a manner consistent with the law Financial Or Budget Considerations This proposed ordinance would establish a procedure for evaluating and potentially disposing of city- owned real property. The exact financial impacts would depend on the actions taken by the City. Recommended Action Motion to adopt First Consideration of Ordinance No. 727, Amending City Code Chapter 2. – Administration. to establish a public land disposition procedure. Supporting Documents • Public Land Disposition Ordinance No. 727 (3 pages) • Executive Summary from Council Work Session 10/12/21 (3 pages) ORDINANCE NO. 727 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE Amending Chapter 2 – Administration to Establish a New Ordinance to Prioritize Surplus Public Lands for Affordable Housing The City Council for the City of Golden Valley hereby ordains as follows: Section 1. City Code Chapter 2 entitled “Administration” is amended by adding the following: Article VII. – Public Land Disposition Sec. 2-166. – Purpose. As a founding member of the Just Deeds Coalition, the City of Golden Valley commits to acknowledging the pervasive history of legal and systematic housing discrimination for Black, Indigenous, Asian, Latinx, and Jewish people through discriminatory covenants and redlining. Previous Golden Valley City Councils and Planning Commissions endorsed these practices and created a housing ecosystem that restricted potential for affordable housing and racially segregated the City. The City of Golden Valley recognizes that its current housing environment severely underprovides affordable options, both in regard to rental and ownership housing. A shortage of quality affordable housing is not only damaging to the economic prosperity of the City and surrounding region, but actively restricts low-to-moderate income households from choosing to live in Golden Valley. In addition, high housing costs contribute to both the historical and ongoing disparities in homeownership rates within the City, gatekeeping this key economic opportunity from those who might benefit from it the most. Addressing the affordable housing gap, through all means available, is one of the City’s most expedient means of making itself a supportive and united community, strengthened by the diversity of its residents. In recognition of the shortage of affordable housing, the City of Golden Valley encourages the use of vacant, unused parcels of land located within and owned by the City or the HRA for the development of affordable housing. It is the City’s intent to identify and catalog real property owned by the City and HRA that is no longer required for its purposes and is or may be suitable for the development of affordable housing for low-income and very low-income households. Affordable housing needs and opportunities shall be considered before surplusing public lands for other purposes that are non-essential to local government operation. Sec. 2-167. – Definitions. For purposes of this ordinance, in addition to the terms defined above, the following terms shall have the meanings set forth below: “Commercially reasonable sale” means a sale or other conveyance that is an “arms length” arrangement, for the fair market value of the property. A commercially reasonable sale or conveyance may be by auction, private sale, trade-in as a component of replacement of obsolete property for new property, sealed bids, or by broker or agent listing. City employees and elected officials shall be prohibited from purchasing or otherwise acquiring any interest in any City surplus property. Ordinance No. 727 -2- “Disposition” means the lease or sale of property or other disposition or conveyance of real property. “Affordable housing” means residential housing that is rented or owned by a person who qualifies as a “very low-income,” or “low-income” or who is from a special needs population, and whose monthly housing costs, including utilities other than telephone, do not exceed 30 percent of the household’s monthly income. (i) “Very low-income household” means a single person, family, or unrelated persons living together whose income is at or below 50 percent of the median income, adjusted for household size, for the City where the affordable housing is located. (ii) “Low-income household” means a single person, family, or unrelated persons living together whose income is more than 50 percent but is at or below 80 percent of the median income where the affordable housing is located. “Nonprofit corporation, qualified” as used in this chapter means private or public corporations duly organized according to the laws of the state of Minnesota, which non-profit corporations are exempt from taxation under USC 501(c) as amended, and which have a proven ability to provide affordable housing or can otherwise show an ability to do so and meet obligations that may be imposed in a conveyance of property to meet affordable housing needs. For purposes of donation of surplus personal property, this term shall also mean a nonprofit corporation that serves or benefits low-income or very low-income persons or persons with disabilities. “Property” as defined by this chapter means all real property (real estate) owned in fee simple title by the City of Golden Valley or the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Golden Valley (“HRA”), located within the City’s incorporated municipal boundaries. “Property” shall also mean all personal property (non-real estate) and all real and personal property originally acquired for public utility purposes. “Property” shall not include public streets, alleys, and rights-of-way which are subject to vacation and disposition. “Property” shall not include any equity interest in real or personal property held or owned by the City or HRA except for real estate security interests taken or released to secure the installation of development improvements. “Suitable for affordable housing” means the parcel is of a size sufficient to support one or more housing units, that its site characteristics are generally suitable for development, that development would be consistent with the City’s Zoning Code, and that development would be consistent with the City’s stated goals and policies. “Surplusing” means the process of identifying property that is no longer required to meet the duties and responsibilities of the City, and instead disposing of such property in a fashion that is consistent with this section. Sec. 2-168. – Policies for Determining that Property is Surplus and should be Designated for Affordable Housing Purposes. (a) No later than March 31st of each calendar year, the City Manager or their designee, shall create and submit a report to the HRA on the status of all real property for which the City or HRA is the custodian. The report shall include: Ordinance No. 727 -2- 1. any change in use or status for each parcel since the previous year's report; and 2. a recommended course of action for each City or HRA owned parcel. The HRA shall consider the report and approve a course of action for each parcel. The report and approved course of action for each parcel shall then be sent to the City Council for consideration and approval. (b) No later than March 31st of every third calendar year beginning in 2022, each department that acts as a custodian of real property shall submit a report to the City Manager or their designee justifying retention of all real property for which the department is the custodian. This report shall provide justification based on an existing or planned use of the property that is related to one or more governmental services or long-term goals or policies of the City or HRA. All departmental reports shall be included in the annual report to the HRA created pursuant to Section 2-168 (a) herein. 1. If, in the judgment of the HRA, a department acting as a custodian or real property does not justify retention of the real property ; or if the City Manager or their designee determines that the real property is surplus to the City and HRA’s needs, the HRA shall determine whether the City or HRA have a need for the property that is related to the provision of essential government services, including but not limited to services for the public health, public safety, or services related to transportation, water quality, surface water or other utilities. 2. If the property is not needed for the provision of essential government services, the HRA shall then determine if the parcel is suitable for affordable housing. If a property is deemed suitable for affordable housing the City shall first attempt to make it available or use it for affordable housing prior to any alternative use. 3. If the property is not deemed suitable for affordable housing, then the HRA shall determine whether the City or HRA have any need for the parcel in order to provide additional open space, natural areas, and recreational amenities. 4. If the property is not deemed suitable for affordable housing, and the HRA determines there is no other suitable use for the property, the property may be disposed of in any manner consistent with the law, such as sale, lease, grant, transfer, conveyance, or otherwise. Sec. 2-169 – Process for Disposition of Surplus Property Suitable for Affordable Housing. (a) Commercially Reasonable Sale or Conveyance. Unless otherwise excepted in subsection B of this section, all disposal of property by the City or HRA shall be commercially reasonable and the City and HRA shall not dispose of real property without an independent appraisal. (b) All surplus property deemed suitable for affordable housing shall be disposed of by the City or HRA under any one of the following conditions, which many include disposition at less than market or appraised value, and without appraisal: a. Intergovernmental transfers; b. Transfer to qualified public or private nonprofit entities; c. Transfer to a public development authority created to develop or manage affordable housing. Ordinance No. 727 -2- Disposal of surplus property deemed suitable for affordable housing may include sale, lease, options to purchase, lease purchase transactions, or public-private partnership, and may occur by use of negotiations or bidding, as the HRA and City deem desirable, fair and appropriate. Section 2. City Code Chapter 1 entitled “General Provisions” and Sec. 1-8 entitled “General Penalty; Continuing Violations” are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law. Adopted by the City Council this 21st day of December, 2021. /s/Shepard M. Harris Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: /s/ Theresa Schyma Theresa Schyma, City Clerk Golden Valley Council Work Session October 12, 2021 Agenda Item 4.Public Land Disposition Ordinance Discussion Prepared By Myles Campbell, Planner Summary In 2019, City Council directed staff to pursue a Capacity Building Grant from the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency to assist with a potential project regarding vacant ROW and highway turnback parcels. As part of that project, the City committed to considering a Public Land Disposition Policy – language that would help direct decision-making by elected officials as to the use of publicly owned property. The policy was discussed with the City Council in June, when they received the accompanying community engagement report. At that meeting, staff and Council Members discussed the potential to adopt a full ordinance rather than a policy, establishing the public land disposition rules as part of the City Code. This is the first discussion of the ordinance and staff is seeking preliminary feedback before any public hearings necessary for its adoption by the City Council. Ordinance Description The Public Land Disposition Ordinance draft by staff can be broken down into 4 key components: •Purpose – Outlines the intention behind the ordinance, addresses the need for additional affordable housing, and notes how the ordinance seeks to impact the overall provision of affordable housing. •Definitions – Defines terminology used in the ordinance, so as to be better understood by a potential reader. It is important not to assume whoever is reading the ordinance is familiar with real estate jargon. •Process for reporting and identifying suitable public land – Lays out the process of inventorying public lands, establishes a hierarchy of uses, and sets standards for what is considered buildable/developable. •Process for disposing land – Outlines options available when making land available to a party outside of the City of Golden Valley. Together, these sections should provide a clear and logical path for determining suitability of sites for affordable housing, and taking some subjectivity out of the process. Staff was deliberate in steering eligible land towards affordable housing, so long as it met some standards of suitability, however this preference in the ordinance should not be at odds with other governmental services. Staff hopes that the ordinance will, in addition to increasing affordable housing opportunities, lead to a fuller understanding of City-owned land and more efficient use of those properties. Executive Summary Council Work Session City of Golden Valley October 12, 2021 2 To summarize the procedure, on an annual basis, Physical Development staff would present to the City Housing Redevelopment Authority (HRA) an inventory of all City-owned properties, information on their current use, and in subsequent years any changes in their use. Every third year, an additional supplement would be provided for these properties outlining justifications for preserving the properties as they are, either due to an existing use of the property or a stated long-range goal or policy of the City. In this fashion, land currently identified in the Comprehensive Plan or Park Plan, for example, could still be used towards its guided end. The HRA would have authority to overrule staff on a particular justification, or to designate another property for retention not called out by staff. With the supplement, property not identified for retention by the HRA would be considered “surplus” and the HRA would enter the process for deciding how it should be used or disposed of. Staff established a hierarchy of uses for land identified as surplus, which is roughly as follows: •Essential Government Services (public safety, traffic, public utilities) •Affordable Housing, if suitable o Suitability includes: Sufficient size Suitable site characteristics consistent with zoning code Consistent with goals and policies Compatible with neighborhood •Open Space, natural areas, recreational facilities •Transfer to adjacent landowner or commercially reasonable sale The inclusion of essential government services is included here for those properties which may not have an active use, or be identified in a long-range plan, but which may have some capacity to improve the City’s provision of service to its residents. However, it is deliberately the only item with a priority above the provision of affordable housing. In regard to suitability, staff tried to account for all factors that would play a role in redeveloping a piece of land as a residential property. It needs to be large enough to support a home that would be built to City zoning standards. Also included is the consistency with City policies and compatibility with neighborhood. This is to remain cognizant that infill development will unavoidably impact immediate neighbors, and that any such action should not result in housing otherwise out of scale with its surroundings. This factor will also be dependent on redevelopment partners selected for affordable housing sites, but inclusion here in the ordinance reinforces the City priority of protecting existing residential neighborhoods. Staff has also discussed how to handle properties that may be located in commercial or industrial areas that may or may not be suitable for housing of any type. In this case, staff sees the consideration of suitability with the neighborhood being a point at which the HRA could decide that housing is not compatible in a particular industrial area. However, it still leaves some flexibility in cases of commercial areas that may mutually benefit from multi-family housing, providing local consumers to those businesses, and walking access to shops and stores for residents. It does raise a larger question for the Council to consider, which is whether they feel the policy should also address land disposition for economic development purposes. Currently this would likely fall under the commercially reasonable sale step, with land being sold to a developer or non-profit to use. Executive Summary Council Work Session City of Golden Valley October 12, 2021 3 The final section outlines the options available for the actual disposal of property. It’s important to note that in a case where property will be used for affordable housing multiple options exist, whereas if the City is simply selling the property to a third-party for any other reason, the sale must be “commercially reasonable”. This term is defined fully in the ordinance, but effectively means that the sale is for a fair market value of the property and cannot be sold to a City employee or official. In cases where the property being disposed is planned to become affordable housing, options outside the commercially reasonable sale are allowed. The City could transfer the land to another governmental institution, a qualified public or private non-profit, or to another public development authority. Under any of these options, the transfer or sale can be for less than market value. The ordinance here is mostly hands off in describing the process for selecting a development partner, but does include that the HRA could bid for the project in a fair and competitive fashion, or to directly negotiate with a development partner. One final area that staff is still reviewing is whether or not the ordinance should anticipate and address lands owned by the HRA versus the City, and whether an additional step in the disposition process should formally include the transfer of land from the City to the HRA before transfer to an outside agency or partner. This seems like a logical step; however, staff would like to confirm if there are any benefits or drawbacks to the City disposing the land directly, versus the HRA. In either instance, staff feels it makes sense that the HRA would be the body to review the annual report on land holdings in their capacity as the redevelopment authority for the City. Financial Or Budget Considerations This proposed ordinance would establish a procedure for evaluating and potentially disposing of city- owned real property. The exact financial impacts would depend on the actions taken by the City. Recommended Action Staff is seeking feedback and initial thoughts. Supporting Documents Public Land Disposition Ordinance Draft (3 pages) 9 Golden Valley Business Council Meeting 8:30 - 9:30 AM Hybrid Brookview - Valley View Room 12 Winter Market in the Valley (Indoors) 10:00 AM – 1:00 PM Brookview Bassett Creek Room 14 Council Work Session 6:30 PM Hybrid Council Chambers 21 City Council Meeting 6:30 PM Hybrid Council Chambers 23 City Offices Closed for Observance of Christmas 24 City Offices Closed for Observance of Christmas 31 City Offices Closed for Observance of New Year's 4 City Council Meeting 6:30 PM Hybrid Council Chambers 9 Winter Market in the Valley (Indoors) 10:00 AM – 1:00 PM Brookview Bassett Creek Room 11 Special City Council Meeting (Council Training) 5:00 PM Council Conference Room 11 Council Work Session 6:30 PM Hybrid Council Chambers 17 City Offices Closed for Observance of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Day 18 Special City Council Meeting (Interviews)(Tentative) 5:30 PM Hybrid Council Chambers 18 City Council Meeting 6:30 PM Hybrid Council Chambers 25 Annual City Council Goal Setting Session 6:30 PM Hybrid Brookview - Valley View Room ANNOUNCEMENT OF MEETINGS AND EVENTS Three or more Council Members may attend the following JANUARY DECEMBER