Loading...
pc-agenda-apr-26-21       REGULAR MEETING AGENDA    This meeting will be held via Webex in accordance with the local emergency declaration made by the  City under Minn. Stat. § 12.37. The public may monitor this meeting by watching on Comcast cable  channel 16, by streaming on CCXmedia.org, or by calling 1‐415‐655‐0001 and entering the meeting  code 133 709 3754. The public may participate in this meeting during public comment sections by  calling 763‐593‐8060 and following the automated prompts.    Additional information about monitoring electronic meetings is available on the City website. For  technical assistance, please contact the City at 763‐593‐8007 or webexsupport@goldenvalleymn.gov.  If you incur costs to call into the meeting, you may submit the costs to the City for reimbursement  consideration.      1. Call to Order    2. Approval of Agenda    3. Approval of Minutes  April 12, 2021, Planning Commission Meeting    4. Public Hearing – Rezone Properties to Achieve Conformance with the 2040 Comprehensive Plan  Applicant: City of Golden Valley    5. Public Hearings – Amendments to Future Land Use and Zoning Maps; Major Amendment to PUD 90  Applicant: ISD #270 ‐ Hopkins School District  Address: 5430 and 5300 Glenwood Ave, Golden Valley, MN 55422      – End of Televised Portion of Meeting –  To listen to this portion, please call 1‐415‐655‐0001 and enter meeting access code 133 709 3754.      6. Council Liaison Report    7. Reports on Board of Zoning Appeals and Other Meetings    8. Other Business    9. Adjournment  April 26, 2021 – 7 pm         REGULAR MEETING MINUTES    This meeting was held via Webex in accordance with the local emergency declaration made by  the City under Minn. Stat. § 12.37. In accordance with that declaration, beginning on March 16,  2020, all Planning Commission meetings held during the emergency were conducted  electronically. The City used Webex to conduct this meeting and members of the public were  able to monitor the meetings by watching it on Comcast cable channel 16, by streaming it on  CCXmedia.org, or by dialing in to the public call‐in line.     1. Call to Order  The meeting was called to order at 7:00 by Chair Blum.    Roll Call  Commissioners present: Rich Baker, Ron Blum, Adam Brookins, Andy Johnson, Noah Orloff, Lauren  Pockl, Ryan Sadeghi, Chuck Segelbaum   Staff present:    Jason Zimmerman – Planning Manager, Myles Campbell – Planner   Council Liaison present:  Gillian Rosenquist    Commissioner Johnson asked when the final items from the 2040 Comprehensive Plan will be  discussed. Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager, responded that it depends on applications and in  about 2‐3 months the last pieces will come together.     2. Approval of Agenda  Chair Blum asked for a motion to approve the agenda.  MOTION made by Commissioner Brookins, seconded by Commissioner Sadeghi, to approve the  agenda of April 12, 2021. Staff called a roll call vote and the motion carried unanimously.    3. Approval of Minutes  Chair Blum asked for a motion to approve the minutes from March 22, 2021.  MOTION made by Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Commissioner Brookins, to approve  minutes. Staff called a roll call vote and the motion carried unanimously.    4. Public Hearing – Continued Consideration of a Major Amendment to Hidden Lakes PUD 74  Applicant: Regency Hospital  Address: 1300 Hidden Lakes Parkway, Golden Valley, MN    Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager, reminded the group that this hearing is a follow‐up from a  previous meeting on January 25th, due to new material. This amendment to PUD 74 would allow for  an expansion of the hospital building and that would lead to necessary utility and landscape changes.   April 12, 2021 – 7 pm    City of Golden Valley    Planning Commission Regular Meeting  April 12, 2021 – 7 pm       2  Zimmerman displayed a map and reviewed the zoning district and location within the City of Golden  Valley.   The previous meeting ended with a list of outstanding concerns and since then, there were  negotiations between the hospital and the HOA Board, revisions were made to the plans:   6’ high solid wall along east edge of parking lot   Additional landscaping   Reduction of seven proposed parking spaces (37 vs. 44)    The updated proposal includes a new private agreement between the HOA and the Hospital Board  that addresses eight areas of concern:   Hidden Lakes Parkway – maintenance and cost issues   Employee smoking and littering   Traffic speeds, stop signs, noise, deliveries, etc.   New parking lot landscaping and wall   Lighting   Stormwater management   Construction activities   Future expansion  This private agreement was approved by the HOA Board and hospital, then shared with residents on  April 7th. This agreement is intended to manage issued outside of the PUD permit.    Zimmerman recapped the details of the PUD amendment regarding the size of the addition, utility  details, the existing entrance, dining/day room on the second floor, and the exterior material details.  To illustrate these details, a map was displayed as well as a 3D rendition of the proposal. The updated  plan recap is:   Parking lot reconfiguration triggered:  o Expand to the south, add 37 parking stalls  o Would remain under the usual required parking ratio  o Knoll and existing trees would be removed   New landscaping/screening added along east edge of parking lot – both low and high   Lighting would respond to the City’s “dark skies” requirements   Stormwater treated/managed through an underground system  Using the trip generation data for nursing homes, traffic engineers estimated that the addition would  generate an estimated 42% increase in trips per day (578 to 822).    Zimmerman reviewed the details surrounding community engagement, public comments, and the  schedule for this item appearing before Planning Commission and the scheduled date it will appear  before City Council.    Staff evaluation and preliminary findings were extensive and resulted in a recommendation for  approval subject to 18 conditions.    City of Golden Valley    Planning Commission Regular Meeting  April 12, 2021 – 7 pm       3  Recommendation  Approval of Amendment #8 to Hidden Lakes PUD No. 74, subject to the following conditions:  1. The plans for the Regency Hospital addition, submitted January 13, 2021, and subsequently  updated on March 29, shall become a part of this approval. Required revisions include:  a. Showing and labeling the access gate and trail along the south property line.  b. Reducing lighting levels under second‐floor addition and under the port cochère.  c. Working with staff to locate designated smoking area for employees and visitors.  d. Indicating the location of trash receptacles in and around the parking lot.  2. Public bicycle racks or similar facilities for a minimum of 11 bicycles shall be provided. The  applicant shall work with staff to appropriately locate the bicycle facilities.  3. The applicant shall provide a snow storage/removal plan that does not reduce the number  of parking stalls nor impact the public trail for staff review and approval prior to City  approval of the PUD Permit.  4. A public walkway easement shall be dedicated over the public trail in the southeast corner  of the site. This trail shall be temporarily rerouted and maintained for public use during  construction.  5. A permanent conservation easement shall be dedicated along the shoreland of Twin Lake.  6. The applicant shall repair and maintain the fence along the south property line to  discourage cut through foot traffic to Twin Lake.  7. The applicant shall utilize motion sensors on parking lot lighting, and utilize motions sensors  and motorized shades on timers within the day room, in order to reduce unnecessary  illumination and reduce impacts to adjacent properties.  8. The applicant shall install and maintain landscaping adjacent to the public trail on the east  side of the property in accordance with the approved plans on file with the City.  Maintenance shall include all reasonable care, trimming, repairs, and replacement needed  to ensure the landscaping improvements are kept in good condition.  9. With the exception of oxygen deliveries, large truck deliveries and pick‐ups shall be limited  to the hours of 7 am to 8 pm daily.  10. The hospital shall be limited to a total of 92 beds. The building footprint shall not be  expanded without the required review and approval by the City.  11. The applicant shall work with staff to address questions around the outdoor chemical  storage areas near the southwest corner of the building.  12. Plans must be reviewed and approved by the Bassett Creek Watershed Management  Commission.  13. A stormwater maintenance and chloride management agreement with the City shall be  executed.  14. The applicant shall complete all inspections related to the City’s Inflow and Infiltration  requirements and work with staff to resolve any repairs or improvements necessary.  15. An updated agreement between the hospital and association, addressing reimbursement  procedures and commitments for construction‐related damage on Hidden Lakes Parkway  and the reallocation of roadway expenses, shall be provided to the City for review prior to  approval of the PUD Permit.  City of Golden Valley    Planning Commission Regular Meeting  April 12, 2021 – 7 pm       4  16. The applicant shall share with the City its plan for management of trash in and around the  parking lot as well as for employee communication around these efforts.  17. The applicant shall address the three conditions outlined by the Minneapolis Park and  Recreation Board in its letter dated December 29, 2020.  18. A development agreement shall be drafted prior to City approval of the PUD Permit and  shall include details on:  a. Permitted days and hours of construction activity.  b. The location and nature of construction parking, access, delivery, staging,  equipment and materials storage, and employee parking.  c. A neighborhood “Hot Line” for issue resolution.    Commissioner Pockl asked how the City insures the private agreements are enforced. Zimmerman  responded that the City stays out of the private agreement between the hospital and the HOA. Any  condition or agreement in the PUD permit has the enforcement of the PUD process. Violations will  be addressed, require corrective actions, and could result in legal action.   With all the conditions and the private agreement, Commissioner Johnson asked if the Planning  Commission has now set itself up as a mediator and straying from its expertise in reviewing parking  etc. He followed up by asking who has precedence, the HOA or the homeowners in the HOA.  Zimmerman responded that staff has not inserted itself in the private agreement but together they  came to the City and asked how it could be enforceable. The HOA will discuss what they intend to do  to enforce their agreement. Johnson followed up that he hopes the Commission stays within its  realm of ability.      Chair Blum invited the Applicant to address the Commission.     Dave Garmin, Applicant ‐ Regency Hospital, stated the private agreement with the HOA was a good  compromise that benefits them and the HOA.     Chair Blum opened the public hearing at 7:40pm.    Jeff Eisenberg, President of HOA, stated staff provided a good presentation and elaborated on a  background between the HOA and the applicant. Discussion between the HOA and Commissioners  included resident input on and responses to the agreement.    Fredda Pink  1405 Waterford Drive  My husband has written quite a bit but my concern is the hospital is planning on doing a piling. I  don’t know how many people are aware of the noise associated with a piling. My son is a real estate  developer and he told us a few days ago that there’s a more expensive style that eliminates the  constant pounding noise and potential damage to our homes. I was wondering if it would be possible  to look into that, it would relieve a lot of tension. There’s also no protection for the people who face  the north end of the hospital, we have a full view of the north end of the building and parking lot.  That hasn’t been addressed either.   City of Golden Valley    Planning Commission Regular Meeting  April 12, 2021 – 7 pm       5    Patrick Lewis  1750 Waterford Court  I wanted to clarify a few things from the presentation, there isn’t unanimous HOA Board support for  the agreement and there is a difference between the homeowners and the HOA. I’ll reiterate that  this project will be problematic no matter what, it’s a commercial development in a residential area.  This expansion involves all the mitigations discussed to mask the issue that it’s too big of a build for  this area. The hospital said they don’t have plans to expand but there’s nothing preventing them  from proposing expansions in later years. The main thing I want to state again is that there isn’t an  agreement between homeowners, the HOA Board doesn’t represent the homeowners, and there  isn’t even agreement among the Board.     Ron Schiferl  4220 Woodland Trail  There’s been significant improvement since the last Planning Commission Meeting. The landscaping  plan pictures look great but the actual plan proposed is to limit the trees to 6foot‐that’s exactly as  high as the wall. There needs to be more variation in the plan. I hope the city works with the hospital  to create more variety so it looks like landscaping. Can we add something to ensure the hospital  maintains its landscaping as they have a history of not doing that. The last Planning Commission  meeting there was mention that the hospital reached out to homeowners, they had not before or  after that meeting. All communication has come from the HOA. My understanding is that this plan is  for a two‐story building to allow for expansion on the first floor, if the hospital isn’t planning on any  expansions in the future, why do they still need a two‐story building?    Chair opened Commissioner discussion.     The Chair asked staff to address the pilings question. Zimmerman said his understanding is that  they’re not planning on using pilings but rather do spread footings. He followed up that he’s not sure  how that impacts surrounding properties. A development agreement can address those issues.  Displaying images from the presentation, staff addressed the concerns regarding shielding from the  north end of the building and staff pointed out that most of the homes are on a hill from the hospital  which may create more difficulties. Zimmerman added a condition to the PUD that landscaping must  be maintained and trees will be 6 feet in height to start, not top out at 6 feet.    Chair closed the public hearing at 8:11pm.    Commissioners Johnson asked if the parking spaces exceed minimum amount, why is the City  agreeing to this when they value green space. Staff responded that the minimum amount from the  hospital is their standard amount and they’d prefer more to accommodate staff, training, visitors  etc. Johnson expressed concern on this topic and feels the number of parking spaces is arbitrary.  Commissioner Pockl asked if they can ask the applicant why removal of the knoll is needed.   City of Golden Valley    Planning Commission Regular Meeting  April 12, 2021 – 7 pm       6  Alan Catchpool, Applicant Engineer with Kimley‐Horn, stated that public utilities goes through the  site and to the SE corner and the entrance to the parking lot is through the knoll. Those items require  the knoll removal.   Chair Blum noted the dedication of a conservation easement and staff responded that most of twin  lakes has a conservation easement along it and the City would like to continue protecting that area.  This helps prevent erosion and development and the area is not currently developed. Blum asked if  it’s harder to develop on a slope as steep as the one along the hospital to the lake. Zimmerman  responded that it is and was part of the hospital’s original plan but the decided against it. Blum noted  to Commissioners that the area unlikely to be developed and may have less value to be dedicated as  a conservation easement.   Pockl asked the HOA representatives to explain how the HOA Board came to support the private  agreement as a caller noted they hadn’t. Eisenberg, HOA, stated that the Board was updated after  every conversation with the hospital and the Board voted unanimously to support the private  agreement.   Johnson referred to page 10 that the applicant wants to use motion sensors in the parking lot, and  asked if that means the lot will be completely dark. Zimmerman stated the City Code has a minimum  level for how the lot is illuminated.     Blum discussed the building height and setbacks in the proposal. Commissioners had a discussion  revolving around these items, lighting, and the easement. The discussion moved on to property  maintenance, the applicant meeting requirements, and negotiations between applicant, city and  HOA.   Commissioner Segelbaum commended the negotiations and supports staff recommendation.   Commissioner Brookins stated he supports the proposal and staff recommendation. Blum asked for  more mitigating changes. Commissioner Sadeghi asked if the HOA Board mentioned the items  concerning to Blum as they will feel the direct impacts. Eisenberg, HOA, responded that the private  agreement, gives them more rights than they had before. The hospital needs repairs and the  proposal will help that. Pockl said she’s not concerned about the setbacks or height, negotiations  have been productive and the hospital improvements will have a positive impact. Pockl stated  support for staff recommendations. Commissioner Johnson said he tried to consider all parties  involved and doesn’t think an HOA Board has more say than the average resident. He added the  process may need to change in the forward to ensure consideration of everyone’s rights.     MOTION made by Commissioner Brookins, seconded by Commissioner Segelbaum to formally  adopt staff findings and follow staff recommendation for approval subject to the 18 conditions as  listed in the memo.       Chair Blum stated he felt the final approval could be stricter.   2d: Blum suggested the language change to “install and maintain”  16: Blum suggested instead of the plan being shared, that there be more certain language.     Staff took a roll call vote on the motion and it passed unanimously.       City of Golden Valley    Planning Commission Regular Meeting  April 12, 2021 – 7 pm       7  5. Public Hearing – Amendments to Future Land Use and Zoning Maps   Applicant: Golden Valley Country Club  Address: Northwest corner of 7001 Golden Valley Road    Prior to presentation, Commissioner Sadaghei recused himself as there was a conflict of interest.     Myles Campbell, Planner, summarized that the applicant is petitioning the City for both a Zoning Map  Amendment and a change to the City’s Future Land Use Plan for a portion of the Golden Valley Country  Club Property. Property is currently zoned I‐4 for Institutional use and the requests would result in the  property being zoned “R‐1, Single Family Residential. Reguiding and Rezoning the property is the first  step to allowing the site to be redeveloped for single‐family housing.    Country Club approached the City in late 2019 about the opportunity to sell a portion of their property  to a private developer. 7001 Golden Valley Road is in total 148.76 acres, the area being considered for  rezoning is 2.25 acres.    Ron Clark Construction (developer) is proposing to use the site for the development of seven single  family homes. The applicant would like to use a new private road to provide access to the homes,  limiting the number of new curb cuts off the public streets, and allowing for additional greenspace  buffers. A PUD would be necessary and the City would require some public benefits and amenities in  order to allow for flexibilities such as the private road. None of these actions can occur without change  to the site’s zoning and guided land use    Campbell discussed the existing conditions of the area, topography, creek location, and showed maps  to illustrate these items.   The approvals process prior to any redevelopment is large, if the rezoning and reguiding are approved,  the applicant must then either apply for a major subdivision or a PUD. A potential approval schedule  was displayed assuming each step was approved without tabling or additional review.     Staff analyzed surrounding uses, traffic generation, buildable lots, and the comprehensive plan.    Staff Findings   The site is currently in an area with other R‐1 zoned properties, and would not be out of  character with the surrounding neighborhood.   More work is needed to determine the safest street access to the new residential  development, but Engineering staff is not concerned about the traffic generated by the  inclusion of new single‐family residential in the area.    The use of this site for a residential purpose fits with a number of the goals and objectives of  the Comprehensive Plan.   In its Housing Chapter, the Comprehensive Plan recognizes the need for new housing in the  City to maintain pace with demand, but notes the lack of available land area for a relatively  City of Golden Valley    Planning Commission Regular Meeting  April 12, 2021 – 7 pm       8  built‐out city. Rezoning this land and allowing for development would be a path to providing  some new housing in the city.    While the focus of rezoning should be on all potential future users under the R‐1 zoning  designation, the narrative provided by Ron Clark Construction demonstrates both a high  quality end product and an understanding that they are entering an existing neighborhood  and an area with critical natural resources to protect.    Recommendation  Staff recommends approval of the requested amendment to the Zoning Map, changing the zoning  designation for the proposed parcel as described in the land survey from Institutional Sub‐district I‐4,  to Single Family Residential R‐1.    Staff recommends approval of the requested amendment to the Future Land Use Map, changing the  guided land use for the proposed parcel as described in the land survey from Parks & Natural Areas to  Low Density Residential.    The discussion started with process explanations and, PUD process, community engagement, and  other input from watershed organizations and Met. Council. Chair Blum commented that it seems  PUDs tend to maximize number of lots which causes concern for him on the size of lots proposed in  this area. Campbell explained that a PUD can allow for more design flexibility, helps the City maintain  wooded areas and greenspace. The City also changed the PUD requirements and new standards are in  place to identify public amenities to be included in a PUD which allows the developer design flexibility.  Campbell added he doesn’t feel a PUD only serves the developer.   Commissioner Pockl asked if consideration for mature vegetation could be added to PUD  requirements. Campbell responded that tree and landscape requirements would be required  regardless of how the lots are established. The conversation moved on to discuss requirements for  vegetation prior to these other approvals, hoping the property owner doesn’t clear cut prior to the  landscaping considerations being in place.    Commissioner Johnson expressed concern that the group is picking at the comp plan and how  affordable and variety of housing is being factored into this plan. Campbell stated that the purchase  agreement for the property may preclude affordable housing policies. However, the mixed‐income  property policy requires new developments over a certain scale, make a percentage of the units  available at a lower income value. In this case, the 7 units, do not meet the requirement for the policy.  There are items in other chapters of the comp plan that can be addressed later in the proposal, at this  point there are not enough details to say if these goals will be met.  Blum stated that the Comp. Plan can be used to argue against the proposal as well and cited the open  green space item.     Pockl asked if the topography of the site limits development. Campbell responded that Engineering  staff didn’t have an initial reaction when reviewing the proposal but details surrounding those specifics  will be reviewed and discussed when this process is further along. Watershed and state agencies will  be included in those conversations.   City of Golden Valley    Planning Commission Regular Meeting  April 12, 2021 – 7 pm       9  Chair Blum invited the applicant to speak.     Ron Clark Construction, Applicant, has been working with the club for 6‐8 months and they feel  strongly that re‐zoning that area to be R‐1 makes sense. The Club has been focused on making sure  this benefits the City and the golf course and has had a holistic approach to this process. The design  isn’t cookie cutter and the creation of a private road helps appeal from the course and helps the buffer  to the road side.     Chair Blum opened the public hearing at 10:04pm.     Eric Boe  1023 Quebec Ave N  I have lived here since 1993 and I’d like to add that all the homes in the area surrounding it are single‐ family detached homes. I think that’s an important detail. It’s good to hear in the plan they’d like to  use a private road. One thing not mentioned, the four‐way intersection at Pennsylvania and Plymouth  is offset. That creates limited visibility and any additional traffic and parked cars will add to safety  concerns.  I don’t want to see parking on this intersection or short driveways like over by Menards, I’d  like to see a sidewalk added to the plan for added safety.     Brent Behn  1300 Kelly Drive  My concerns are regarding the term “low‐density” as it seems 7 large homes will be on a 2‐acre site  and that appears to be fairly dense. This density level doesn’t fit in the community surrounding as the  surrounding lots are bigger. I’m concerned with the rezoning continuing and more land being used for  development in the golf course.    Eric Brandt  7400 Plymouth Ave N    We have a lot of parks in Golden Valley but I can’t think of another, separate 2.2‐acre wooded lot. I  think we’re giving up a unique lot. Living here and looking at the wild‐life, they will all be impacted by  clearing the trees. The private road sounds appealing but I can’t think of a single private road in Golden  Valley that compares. Also, 7 homes on 2.2 acres is dense for this neighborhood and the proposed lot  development would be an outlier.     (Name inaudible)  1205 Pennsylvania Ave   I’m also speaking on behalf of my neighbors. I’ve been privy to the plans and I want to indicate that  I’m speaking a little out of context as I’m aware of the plans shared with golf course members. The  private road is set to be on Pennsylvania Ave, the intersection is offset and congested. Our neighbors  moved from an area near construction because it was impacting their quality of life and found this  neighborhood mature and enjoyed the forest area across the street. The lot with trees is a gem as the  previous caller mentioned. The cost associated with the development, the homes will not be on the  City of Golden Valley    Planning Commission Regular Meeting  April 12, 2021 – 7 pm       10 affordable side and while it may up our property values, it doesn’t seem that it would further Golden  Valley’s objective to increase middle‐income housing.     Chris Lowman  7440 Plymouth Ave   We bought this house due to its location, we look right at the wooded lot. We are afraid the community  that surrounds us will be taken away with this project. Additional traffic on this already busy corner  makes us worried about the decrease in safety. We’re concerned about the lot sizes not matching the  aesthetic of the neighborhood as well. The target market doesn’t seem to align with the market that  wants to live in this neighborhood. My hope is that whatever decision is made, is the best one for the  neighborhood and the city, not the developer.     Commissioner Orloff stated that he feels more information on the ecological impacts will be needed.  Campbell responded that any development will require removal of many trees and details around that  will be navigated if this becomes a PUD.   Commissioner Segelbaum thanked the callers and noted that many items will be addressed as the  project moves forward. However, it seems that City Engineering staff do not think the addition of 7  homes will create unmanageable traffic. At this early stage, is parking or the offset intersection  considered. Campbell responded that traffic volume is a principal concern, the other concerns will be  addressed later as discussions around the private roadway occur.     Brian Gieseke  1337 Kelly Drive  I’d like to echo what I’ve already heard about the intersection, setbacks, the watershed, and traffic.  The road is already narrow and there isn’t a stop sign for a few blocks so vehicle speeds increase.  Parking will be an issue, especially over the winter and I’m concerned for further lot splitting if this  area is zoned residential. The wooded area is special for our neighborhood and I am concerned for it  to disappear.     Blum urged everyone to utilize flexibility at this early stage and consider what’s most appropriate for  the City and neighborhood here while being fair to the applicant. He referenced the 2040  Comprehensive Plan’s guide for open and green spaces. Blum stated he doesn’t support the applicant’s  request. Pockl echoed those comments and said an appeal of Golden Valley are the green spaces and  natural spaces. Pockl stated she doesn’t feel comfortable changing the zoning and land use at this  point.     Lynne Jensen  1039 Pennsylvania   I’ve lived here 30 years and see a lot of wildlife coming from that area, eagles and owls nest in the trees  proposed to be removed. The road to Winnetka on Plymouth is blocked and a lot of traffic is pushed  to Pennsylvania. Traffic is already a problem on this street and particularly during rush hour. Additional  traffic will also dissuade the active cycling community.     City of Golden Valley    Planning Commission Regular Meeting  April 12, 2021 – 7 pm       11 Commissioner Johnson echoed Blum and Pockl’s and doesn’t see the benefit of taking the vibrant  wooden greenspace and turning it in to 7 homes. Johnson is not in favor of changing the designation.   Segelbaum followed up by saying the group is looking at seeing if the area is appropriate to convert  from unused golf course space to housing. Caller concerns can be mitigated later in the negotiation  process, it seems like there may already be a traffic issue. The PUD process will present an opportunity  to help the existing areas.  Johnson responded that the group has a responsibility to maintain  greenspace. This plan drastically alters the landscape and he feels there will be more harm than good  as a result. Blum responded that if they start the process now, momentum may take over and the  project won’t turn out in the way the Commission intends on. Flexibility may occur now but things may  not always turn out the way we want with that flexibility. Greenspace is valuable and so are lot sizes,  once they’re given up, they’re gone. The group needs to do what it can to preserve those things.     Chair Blum closed the public hearing at 10:45.     Commissioner Brookins stated support for staff recommendation, feeling it’s appropriate for the area.     MOTION made by Commissioner Pockl and seconded by Commissioner Johnson to deny the zoning  designation amendment for the Northwest corner of 7001 Golden Valley Road.   Staff took a roll call vote:    Aye: Johnson, Pockl, Blum  Nay: Brookins, Segelbaum  Motion carries as stated.     MOTION made by Commissioner Pockl and seconded by Commissioner Johnson to deny the land‐use  amendment for the future land‐use map for the Northwest corner of 7001 Golden Valley Road.   Staff took a roll call vote:    Aye: Johnson, Pockl, Blum  Nay: Brookins, Segelbaum  Motion carries as stated.     Televised portion of the meeting concluded at 10:53 pm    6. Council Liaison Report   Council Member Rosenquist provided a brief update on recent Council actions and upcoming  events. The City and the Minneapolis Park Board are close to finalizing a Memorandum of  Understanding regarding public safety/enforcement in Theodore Wirth Park. Three Rivers Park  district is involved regarding trails and bike infrastructure. A late April “call in” session will be  provided for the Police Task Force to receive input from the public. A bill to study Highway 55 Bus  Rapid Transit continues to move through the legislature.    7. Reports on Board of Zoning Appeals and other Meetings  None.  City of Golden Valley    Planning Commission Regular Meeting  April 12, 2021 – 7 pm       12   8. Other Business  None.    9. Adjournment  MOTION by Commissioner Pockl to adjourn, seconded by Commissioner Brookins, and approved  unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 11:02 pm.                                                                                                            ________________________________                                                                                                  Adam Brookins, Secretary  ________________________________  Amie Kolesar, Planning Assistant            1      Date:  April 26, 2021  To:  Golden Valley Planning Commission  From:  Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager  Subject:    Informal Public Hearing – Rezone Properties to Achieve Conformance with the  2040 Comprehensive Plan      Summary  Staff is requesting that 24 properties be considered for rezoning in order to come into  conformance with the Future Land Use Map in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan.    Background  State statute requires that all zoning designations be updated to be consistent with the land uses  identified in the Comprehensive Plan. A number of properties have already been rezoned, while  others are awaiting further action such as the completion of the City’s Downtown Small Area  Plan. Consideration of the current properties was paused while the Planning Commission and City  Council adjusted the text of the zoning chapter of the City Code to allow rowhouses in the R‐2  zoning district. With that change completed, rezoning properties along the northern portions of  Douglas Drive and Winnetka Avenue are now being revisited.    Analysis  The 24 properties under consideration represent two areas within the city. They both  demonstrate a desire on the part of the City to intensify stretches of land along County roads by  upzoning the residential densities allowed. The 2040 Comprehensive Plan put forward these land  use designations as part of the approved Future Land Use Map.    No development proposals are pending with the City at any of these locations.        2    Group 1  This group of 18 primarily single‐family residential properties along both sides of the northern  portion of Douglas Drive was guided for Moderate Density use in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan.  By rezoning to R‐2, duplexes and rowhouses would become options for these properties as they  redevelop. All but one of these properties is currently zoned R‐1; a six‐unit development  occupies a property zoned R‐3. Three lots zoned for single‐family use have legally  nonconforming duplexes; two additional lots are vacant and are owned by the City.  Address Current  Zoning  Current Use Proposed Zoning  2120 Douglas Drive North R‐3 Six‐unit development R‐2  2130 Douglas Drive North R‐1 Single‐family home R‐2  2150 Douglas Drive North R‐1 Single‐family home R‐2  2210 Douglas Drive North R‐1 Single‐family home R‐2  2230 Douglas Drive North R‐1 Single‐family home R‐2  2300 Douglas Drive North R‐1 Vacant R‐2  2310 Douglas Drive North R‐1 Single‐family home R‐2  2400 Douglas Drive North R‐1 Single‐family home R‐2  2410 Douglas Drive North R‐1 Single‐family home R‐2  2415 Douglas Drive North R‐1 Vacant R‐2  2420 Douglas Drive North R‐1 Duplex R‐2  2430 Douglas Drive North R‐1 Single‐family home R‐2  2501 Douglas Drive North R‐1 Single‐family home R‐2  2510 Douglas Drive North R‐1 Single‐family home R‐2  2511 Douglas Drive North R‐1 Single‐family home R‐2  2531 Douglas Drive North R‐1 Single‐family home R‐2  2551 Douglas Drive North R‐1 Duplex R‐2  6325 Medicine Lake Road R‐1 Duplex R‐2  3      At its regular meeting on August 10, 2020, the Planning Commission tabled consideration of a  rezoning of the properties along the east side of Douglas Drive in light of pending zoning text  amendments regarding rowhouses in the R‐2 zoning district.    Given the new zoning language, rowhouses would be allowed on these properties, in addition to  duplexes, should redevelopment occur. This would support the City’s goals of encouraging transit  along arterial corridors and providing new types of housing. The existing single‐family homes  would still be considered permitted uses under R‐2 zoning, so would not be impacted by this  change.  4    Staff is recommending one deviation from the land use plan adopted as part of the 2040  Comprehensive Plan. The property at 2120 Douglas Drive zoned R‐3 currently houses six  affordable units in two separate buildings. Rezoning this property to R‐2 would effectively lower  the number of units that could be constructed and might be viewed as encouraging the  displacement of affordable housing. Given how much additional thought has gone into the City’s  housing plan since the Future Land Use map was draft four years ago, it is not inappropriate for  the Planning Commission and City Council to consider this change. Staff supports a denial of the  proposed rezoning to R‐2 and recommends allowing the property to remain zoned R‐3. The  would also provide an appropriate transition between the R‐2 zoning district to the north and the  Neighborhood Mixed Use zoning district to the south.    Group 2  The west side of Winnetka Avenue North, between 23rd Avenue North and Medicine Lake Road,  currently contains a vacant lot, four single‐family homes, a small office building, and the Golden  Valley Cemetery. The 2040 Comprehensive Plan guided the office building and the adjacent  single‐family home for Medium Density use, and the remaining four properties to the south for  Moderate Density use.  Address Current Zoning Current Use Proposed Zoning  2445 Winnetka Ave North Office Office building R‐3  2415 Winnetka Ave North R‐1 Single‐family home R‐3  2409 Winnetka Ave North R‐1 Single‐family home R‐2  2337 Winnetka Ave North R‐1 Single‐family home R‐2  2325 Winnetka Ave North R‐1 Single‐family home R‐2  PID 3011821110083 R‐1 Vacant R‐2  5      At its regular meeting on August 24, 2020, the Planning Commission considering a proposed  rezoning of 2445 and 2415 Winnetka from Office and R‐1 to R‐3, as guided in the Comp Plan. At  that point, testimony was provided by the owners of those properties in favor of the rezoning  and by a handful of neighbors in opposition.    It was noted that the current office use had been struggling in recent years and the property  owner had previously asked the City to consider a rezoning to Commercial. This request was  denied based on concerns regarding a number of potential uses that would be allowed under this  zoning designation. The Planning Commission felt this property, along with the single‐family  home to the south that has the same ownership, had the potential to provide a residential  transition between the high density development to the east and single‐family neighborhoods to  the west. This was the basis for the change to Medium Density Residential on the Future Land  Use map.    6    Given the outstanding questions regarding the appropriateness of R‐3 zoning in this location, the  Planning Commission tabled a decision to allow time for a conversation around rowhouses in the  R‐2 zoning district to take place. Concerns voiced by neighbors centered on increased building  height, traffic, and noise (see attached minutes of the August 24 meeting).    The key aspects of the two zoning designations being considered are listed below:  Medium Density Residential (R‐3) Zoning District  Permitted Uses  Duplexes   Townhouses   Multifamily buildings   Senior and physical disability housing  Conditional Uses  Retail sales, restaurants, and professional offices on a ground floor with  direct access to the street  Density Range  12 units per acre or 17 units per acre with a CUP (up to three additional  units per acre available through density bonuses)   Senior/physical disability housing – 20 units per acre or 25 units per acre  with a CUP (up to five additional units per acre available through density  bonuses)  Height  Four stories or 48 feet   Five stories or 60 feet for senior/physical disability housing with a CUP  Moderate Density Residential (R‐2) Zoning District  Permitted Uses  Single‐family homes   Duplexes   Rowhouses  Density Range  Up to eight units per acre  Height  28 feet to the midpoint of the highest pitched roof for single‐family  homes and duplexes   35 feet maximum for rowhouses    Similar to the points raised above about upzoning R‐1 properties to R‐2 along arterials, the other  four properties under consideration would have the option to redevelop at a slightly higher  density – either as duplexes or rowhouses.    Should the City chose not to rezone any of these properties, an amendment to the Future Land  Use Map would then be required with the Met Council – modifying the recently‐adopted 2040  Comprehensive Plan – in order to maintain consistency between guided land use and zoning.    Recommended Action  Staff recommends approval of an amendment to the Zoning Map to rezone the 17 of the 18  properties in Group 1 from Single‐Family Residential (R‐1) to Moderate Density Residential (R‐2).  7      Staff recommends denial of an amendment to rezone 2120 Douglas Drive North from Medium  Density Residential (R‐3) to Moderate Density Residential (R‐2).    Staff recommends approval of an amendment to rezone 2445 Winnetka Avenue North from  Office to Medium Density Residential (R‐3) and 2415 Winnetka Avenue North from Single‐Family  Residential (R‐1) to Medium Density Residential (R‐3).    Staff recommends approval of an amendment to the Zoning Map to rezone four properties in  Group 2 from Single‐Family Residential (R‐1) to Moderate Density Residential (R‐2).    Attachments  List of Affected Properties (1 page)  Maps of Future Land Use and Existing Zoning Designations (2 pages)  Planning Commission minutes of August 24, 2020 (8 pages)    List of Affected Properties  Address Current Zoning Proposed Zoning  2120 Douglas Drive North R‐3 R‐2  2130 Douglas Drive North R‐1 R‐2  2150 Douglas Drive North R‐1 R‐2  2210 Douglas Drive North R‐1 R‐2  2230 Douglas Drive North R‐1 R‐2  2300 Douglas Drive North R‐1 R‐2  2310 Douglas Drive North R‐1 R‐2  2400 Douglas Drive North R‐1 R‐2  2410 Douglas Drive North R‐1 R‐2  2415 Douglas Drive North R‐1 R‐2  2420 Douglas Drive North R‐1 R‐2  2430 Douglas Drive North R‐1 R‐2  2501 Douglas Drive North R‐1 R‐2  2510 Douglas Drive North R‐1 R‐2  2511 Douglas Drive North R‐1 R‐2  2531 Douglas Drive North R‐1 R‐2  2551 Douglas Drive North R‐1 R‐2  6325 Medicine Lake Road R‐1 R‐2  2445 Winnetka Ave North Office R‐3  2415 Winnetka Ave North R‐1 R‐3  2409 Winnetka Ave North R‐1 R‐2  2337 Winnetka Ave North R‐1 R‐2  2325 Winnetka Ave North R‐1 R‐2  PID 3011821110083 R‐1 R‐2    Group 1  Future Land Use      Current Zoning                  Group 2  Future Land Use      Current Zoning            REGULARMEETINGMINUTES  ThismeetingwasheldviaWebexinaccordancewiththelocalemergencydeclarationmadeby theCityunderMinn.Stat.§12.37.Inaccordancewiththatdeclaration,beginningonMarch16, 2020,allPlanningCommissionmeetingsheldduringtheemergencywereconducted electronically.TheCityusedWebextoconductthismeetingandmembersofthepublicwere abletomonitorthemeetingsbywatchingitonComcastcablechannel16,bystreamingiton CCXmedia.org,orbydialingintothepubliccallͲinline. Thepublicwasabletoparticipateinthismeetingduringpubliccommentsections,bydialingthe publiccallͲinline.  1. CalltoOrder Themeetingwascalledtoorderat7:00byChairBlum.  RollCall Commissionerspresent:RichBaker,RonBlum,AdamBrookins,AndyJohnson,NoahOrloff,Ryan Sadeghi,ChuckSegelbaum Commissionersabsent:LaurenPockl Staffpresent: JasonZimmerman–PlanningManager,MylesCampbell–Planner CouncilLiaisonabsent:GillianRosenquist  2. ApprovalofAgenda ChairBlumaskedforamotiontoapprovetheagenda. MOTIONmadebyCommissionerJohnson,secondedbyCommissionerBrookinstoapprovethe agendaofAugust24,2020.Staffcalledarollcallvoteandthemotioncarriedunanimously.  3. ApprovalofMinutes ChairBlumaskedforamotiontoapprovetheminutesfromAugust10,2020. MOTIONmadebyCommissionerBrookins,secondedbyCommissionerSegelbaumtoapprovethe August10,2020meetingminutes. Staffcalledarollcallvoteandthemotioncarriedunanimously.  4. InformalPublicHearing–ZoningTextAmendment–Section113Ͳ90:MediumDensityResidential (RͲ3)ZoningDistrict Applicant:CityofGoldenValley  JasonZimmerman,PlanningManager,reiteratedthisitemisrequiredfollowupfromadoptionof the2040CompPlan.  August24,2020–7pm  CityofGoldenValley PlanningCommissionRegularMeeting August24,2020–7pm   2 ZimmermanexplainedthatRͲ3isconsideredmediumdensityandshowedthisdiagramtoillustrate thedifferencesbetweenthedesignationinthe2040CompPlanandtheexistingRͲ3zoning.      Themainreasonthisitemwastabledwastoaddressdensitybonuses.Theoldbonuseswerebased onanothereraandonadevelopingcommunity.Itwasaskedifnewbonusescouldbereflectiveofa redevelopingcommunityandofcurrentCitypriorities.Therewasadesiretoreduce“byͲright” densitiesandprovidebonusestogetuptothemaximumsallowed.  Staffreviewedthesebonuses,usingtheCompPlanforguidancethisisstaff’sproposal: MediumDensity(RͲ3) Maximumof12unitsperacreor17unitsperacrewithaCUP(upto3additionalunitsperacre availablethroughdensitybonuses). Forsenior/disabilityhousing,maximumof20unitsperacreor25withaCUP(upto5additional unitsperacreavailablethroughdensitybonuses).  ZimmermanaddedthatapprovingtheproposedzoningdistrictrevisionwouldbringallcurrentRͲ3 propertiesintoconformance.  Staffreviewedpossibletopicsfordensitybonuses:AffordableHousing,EnergyEfficiency,Renewable Energy,andStormwaterManagement. Thetwomaincriterialistedforcreatingdensitybonusesare: 1. IsthetriggerconcreteandnonͲsubjective?Canitbeeasilyquantifiedandmonitored? 2. Doesitinvolveasubstantialinvestmentthatwouldbedifficultorunwieldytoreverseonce thebonushasbeenawarded?  RecommendedDensityBonusTopics x Greenbuildingcertification x Constructionofprivaterenewableenergysystemsorinfrastructure x IncorporationofmicrogridforbackͲuppower x Inclusionofelectricvehiclechargingstations x ConstructionofaboveͲgroundstormwaterfacilities  RecommendedCriteria Densitybonuseswouldbeavailableforanadditional2unitsperacrefor: x GreenbuildingcertificationatthePlatinumlevel CityofGoldenValley PlanningCommissionRegularMeeting August24,2020–7pm   3 x Constructionofprivaterenewableenergysystemsorinfrastructure x IncorporationofmicrogridforbackͲuppower  Densitybonuseswouldbeavailableforanaddition1unitperacrefor: x GreenbuildingcertificationattheGoldlevel x Inclusionofelectricvehiclechargingstations x ConstructionofaboveͲgroundgreenstormwaterfacilities  Recommendation AmendthetextoftheMediumDensityResidential(RͲ3)ZoningDistricttorevisethealloweddensity rangesandupdatethedensitybonusprovisions,asdetailedintheattacheddocument (Underline/OverstrucklanguageforSec.113Ͳ90oftheCityCode).  StaffandCommissionersreviewedspecifictextlanguageandaskedquestions.  ChairBlumopenedthepublichearingat7:22pm.  Therewerenocallersatthetimeofopeningthehearing.Commissionerscontinuedtoaskstaff questionsregardinglanguageintheordinanceversusinthepolicy.Theconversationcontinuedintoa potentialpointsystemandlevelsofbonuses.  DianneHofstead 2450ValdersAveN CallerstatedthatshesubmittedalettertoCommissionersandsheopposestheRͲ3reͲzoning. Mediumdensityisnotappropriatefortheareaastheincreaseinbuildingheights,traffic,andnoise wouldbedisastrousforthearea.  HannahFotsch 8445PatsyLane Calleraskedabouttheindustrialzoningchangesandiftherewillbechangestothenaturepreserve.  ChairBlumtoldthecallershedidn’tneedtocallbackbutthathercommentwouldbeaddressed duringthenextagendaitem.  Zimmermanchimedintoreiteratetherearetwopublichearingsduringthismeetingandiffolksare callingaboutreͲzoningsintheNWportionofGoldenValley,topleasewaitforthenextagendaitem.  Theconversationmovedontospecificsaboutdensitybonusesandthepermanenceofsomeoptions thatwillleadtobonuses.Theconversationcircledbacktothedensitybonuscategoriesbeinginthe ordinanceandthenaddingdetailsinapolicydocumentatalaterdate.  MatthewFaber 2325WinnetkaAveN CityofGoldenValley PlanningCommissionRegularMeeting August24,2020–7pm   4 Caller’smainconcernsarethattheCommissionstatesthey’reforhousingforallpeoplebutthey’re mostlyconcernedforenergyefficiency.Raingardensetcforwaterdisplacementisimportantbutthe callerisconcernedthatthereisn’tactualaffordablehousingbeingcreated.ThecallersuggestedRͲ1 housingonconcreteslabswithunattachedgaragesthattheaveragepersoncanafford.Thecaller askedwhyhisfeedwhilewatchinghisphonewentdownandaskedifthemeetingwasactuallypreͲ recordedandnotlive.ChairBlumrespondedandtoldthecallerthathewasparticipatinginalive meetingandthatstaffrespondstoquestionsattheendofthehearing.Thecalleraskedthe Commissionhowmuchtheaverageelectriccarcostsandhowmanypeopleownthemthatare lookingforhousing.TheChairreiteratedthepublichearingprocessandthecallercontinuedtoask forimmediateresponsestohisquestions.  Zimmermanaddedthataffordablehousingisoneofthegoalsemphasizedthroughdensitybonuses. ThisisincentivizedthroughthemixedͲincomehousingpolicy.Thisparticularhearingisaboutdensity bonusesinanRͲ3zoningdistrict,thatdoesnotincludesinglefamilyhomes.Thisconversationshould continuewhentheRͲ1districtconversationoccurs.  TheCommissionerscontinuedthediscussionarounddensitybonusesanditsrelationtoaffordability. Theconversationevolvedintohousingtypesaswellasthatbuildingruleswerenotfollowedatsome pointandmodifyingRͲ3zoningtextbringstheareasintoconformancewithoutincreasingtoanRͲ4.  ChairBlumclosedthepublichearingat8:15pm.  MOTIONmadebyCommissionerSegelbaum,andsecondedbyCommissionerBrookinstoapprove thedensitybonuslist,subjecttoPlanningstaffandCityAttorneyreviewofthelanguage. Stafftookarollcallvote. Aye:Baker,Blum,Brookins,Sadeghi,Segelbaum Nay:Johnson Motionpasses,5:1  5. InformalPublicHearing–ZoningMapAmendment–RezoningofPropertiestoAchieve Conformancewiththe2040ComprehensivePlan(Group3) Applicant:CityofGoldenValley  JasonZimmerman,PlanningManager,startedbyaddressingtheoriginalnotificationlettersthat wentouttoresident.TheselettersincludedrezoningofthreepropertiesownedbyGeneralMills owns.Oncetheletterswentout,GMrequestedthepropertiesnotbeincludedinthishearingasthey wouldlikemoreclarificationwiththeCity.Assuch,thoseitemswillnotbediscussedtonight. Zimmermanrevisitedthe2040CompPlanschedulethatstartedinNovember2018.TheFutureLand Usemapwasdisplayedforreferencewiththethreequadrantsofneighborhoods,tonight’shearingis regardingthethirdquadrant.Zimmermancontinuedandbrokedownthetengroupswithinthis quadrantthatareproposedforrezoning.Theyeachhadanassociatedmapandexplanationfrom staff. CityofGoldenValley PlanningCommissionRegularMeeting August24,2020–7pm   5 Wrappingupthepresentation,Zimmermanremindedeveryonethatstatestatuterequiresallzoning designationstobeconsistentwiththelandusesidentifiedintheCompPlanwithinninemonthsof adoption.Headdedthatbusinesseswouldbeallowedtocontinuewithcurrentusesandsitelayouts underalegallynonͲconformingstatus;PUDregulationstakeprecedence. ShouldtheCitychoosenottorezoneanyoftheseproperties,theFutureLandUseMapwouldneed tobeamendedwiththeMetCouncil.  Recommendation FollowingtheprovisionsofStatestatute(sec.473.858,subd.1)andtherequirementsofthe MetropolitanCouncilwithrespecttocomprehensiveplanning,staffrecommendsthe37identified propertiesberezonedasindicated.  CommissionerOrloffaskedifrowhousesareincludedintheRͲ2discussionorifthat’safuture decision.Zimmermanclarifiedthatthedecisiontoincluderowhouseshasnotbeenmade. ZimmermanaddedthatiftheCommissionwantstoresolvetheRͲ2designationspriortoapproving thegroupsthatincludeRͲ2,hesuggeststhosegroupsbetabled.Brookinsmentionedtablinggroup6 aswellsinceadeveloperislookingatapropertyinthatgroup.Thegoalwouldbetorezoneitso whatisdevelopedthereissomethingtheCityislookingfor.Theconversationevolvedintoabrief conversationaboutrezoningsaroundtheCountryClub.  ChairBlumopenedthepublichearingat8:40pm.  VanTran 2445WinnetkaAveN Mypropertyiszoned,office,isthatRͲ2?I’mnotsurethedifferencefromRͲ2andRͲ3.Mypartner ownsthepropertynextdoorandwe’dliketoredevelopthetwopiecesofpropertytogether.Thesize islimitedandifthezoningisn’tright,itwon’tattractadeveloper/investor.  LawrenceJohanns 2415WinnetkaAveN WewouldliketoseetheselotszonedRͲ3andthereseemstobeinterestin55+housing.Developers contactedmeandsaidtheywouldconsiderourlotsiftheywererezonedappropriately.Ithinkthis wouldhelptheCityandtheresidents.MybusinesspartnerandIsupportrezoningtoRͲ3.  JakeLanger 2480ValdersAveN Iopposetherezoning.IboughtmyhomeunderstandingthatIwasmovingintoanRͲ1neighborhood andIwouldnothaveboughtitifIthoughtthepropertynexttomewaszoneddifferently.Havinga4Ͳ 5storybuildinginmyyardwouldbeanalbatross.Ifthishappens,theresidentsshouldreceive compensationfromtheCitythatcoversthevaluedifferencebeforeandafterthisrezoning.  MatthewFaber 2325WinnetkaAveN CityofGoldenValley PlanningCommissionRegularMeeting August24,2020–7pm   6 Iamoffendedhowthismeetingisoccurring,residentsdidn’thaveampletimetoprepareforthis meeting.Idon’thaveaproblemwiththeCitygrowingbuttheserezoningsarechangingtheentire neighborhood.WhatisthetargetgrowthforGoldenValleyby2040?GoingtoanRͲ2ismore acceptable.Howcanyoutalkaboutdisplacementofwaterandtalkaboutaddingunderground parking?IfeellikeyouneedtobemorehonestwithyourconstituentsandI’mstartingapetition tomorrow.  CGriffith 7979JonellenLane Myunderstandingisthatthetwoproposedlotswereoriginallyresidentialandchangedtooffice zoningattherequestoftheownersͲdespiteobjectionfromtheneighbors.Myunderstandingisthat theownersareaskingforRͲ3inordertorecouppropertyvalue.However,thiswouldreducethe valueofneighborpropertiesandwouldpotentiallybeveryhigh.Thiswouldalsoincreasetrafficon analreadycongestedarea.I’mconfusedaboutalettergoingaroundtheneighborhoodthatsaysthe wholeareawillberezonedforamultiͲunitdevelopment.Isthatpartoftheplan?  PattyBurrets 6414GoldenValleyRoad Canyouexplain,exactly,whatMixeduseresidentialmeans?Astripmall?Bakery?Drugstore?I’dlike toknowwhytheCitywouldwantthattohappenonGoldenValleyRoad.Wehavethisparcelthat wasindustrialandwenttooffice.Whyisthisindustrialtooffices?Nowacrossthestreetfrommy houseisMixedͲUse.Iwanttoknowthedifferenceandwhatthatmeans.IappreciateJasontalkingto meforalongtimebutitdoesn’tmakethingssoclearforothers.Thisisaneighborhood.Weneedto thinkaboutthewholecity.  DianneHofstead 2450ValdersAveN IstandbymyletterIsentearlierandmypreviousstatement.RͲ3isnotacceptableforthe Winnetka/Valdersareabecauseoftheheight,additionalnoise,resultingtraffic,andthosevarious reasons.RͲ3isnotagoodfit. ChairBlumaskedstafftogiveaquicksummaryonthedifferencebetweenRͲ2andRͲ3. Zimmermanresponded: RͲ3 x MediumDensityResidential x MultiͲFamily/MultiͲFamilySeniorHousing x 4storiesbyright/5forseniorbuilding x Densitycouldreachupto30units/acre RͲ2 x SingleFamilyhomesandDuplexes x Previousmeetingstherehasbeenadiscussiontoaddrowhouses(sidebysideunits)and notlimitingittoduplex x Heightlimitedto2Ͳ2.5stories. CityofGoldenValley PlanningCommissionRegularMeeting August24,2020–7pm   7 KathyLongar 2105AquillaAve AskediftherecouldbeatrafficstudyontheincreaseinaccidentsonWinnetkanowthatthelanes havedecreased.Istheplanforaccesstotheapartments,thatfolkswoulddriveinandoutfrom ValdersorWinnetka?  TheChairaskedstaffwhattheextentisoftrafficstudiesinrezonings.Zimmermanrespondedthata trafficstudyspecialistispartoftheplanningprocessandplugsinprojectionsbasedonthetarget populationgrowth.ResultsfromtheWinnetkatrafficstudywhenitwasreducedtoa3Ͳlaneroadare notin,whentheyare,theywillbeshared.WhenaproposalfordevelopmentisreceivedbytheCity, thenatrafficstudywilltakeplace.  Chairaskedstafftoclarifywhencommunicationsstartedregardingthisitem. Zimmermanstatedthatdiscussionsstartedafewyearsprior,continuedtoLandUsediscussionbutit wasCitywide,notneighborhoodfocused.Nowindividualpropertiesarebeingproposedfor rezoning,ownersandneighborswith500feetarereceivingpublicinformationfromboththe PlanningCommissionandCityCouncil.CityCoderequiresmailingstogoout10daysinadvanceof themeeting.We’veallheardaboutdelayswithpostalservicesowewillgetCityCouncilnotice lettersoutsoonertocompensate.Staffaddedthatafinaldecisionisn’toccurringatthismeetingbut mayratherberecommendedtoCityCouncilandtheymakethefinaldecision.Zimmerman addressedinquiriesaboutRͲ2zoningsouthonWinnetka,butthatconversationisn’thappening tonight.AdiscussionaboutwhatRͲ2includeswillhappenfirst.TheChairaddedthatthe conversationsregardingrezoningtheseareashaveoccurredforalongtimeandthere’sarobust recordinbothvideoandminutestoseethat.TheChairaskedstafftoaddressthedefinitionof MixedͲUseResidential.ZimmermanremindedeveryonethatthesedefinitionsareintheCityCode, Section113Ͳ97definesMixedͲUse.Thisdistrictisaflexibledistrict:allowsresidential,office, commercialandinstitutional(schools/placesofworship).MixedͲUseResidentialissimilaralbeitona smallerscale:multiͲfamilydwellingsof3ormore,singlefamilydwellings,medicalclinics, restaurants,generalretail,schools,religiousinstitutions.Itwouldprohibit:standͲaloneparkinglots, autorepair,gasstations.Staffcontinuedexplainingtheareaandhistoryofthinkingfortheproposed rezoning.TheChairaskedstaffwhatthetargetgrowthisfortheCity.Zimmermanrespondedthat therearethreeprojectionsforgrowthat2020,2030,and2040.ThecurrentpopulationofGolden Valleyisjustunder25,000.Theprojectionfor2030istoincreasebyaround800moreandby2040 thetargetpopulationis26,700. TheChairopenedthediscussiontoreviewtheothergroupsatlength.Hecontinuedbyaskingstaff aboutwhattheheightdifferenceisbetweenthesubjectpropertiesingroup2relatedtotheRͲ1 properties.Zimmermanrespondedthiswasreviewedin2016andthemeasurementsshowthereisa 20Ͳfootgradedifference.A20ͲfootbuildingwillreachaboutthefirstlevelofthewesterlyabuttingRͲ 1properties.  CommissionerBrookinsstatedsupportfortablinggroup2untiladiscussionaboutexpandingtheRͲ2 designationcanoccur.CommissionerJohnsonandCommissionerSadeghiechoedthissupport. CommissionerBrookinsstatedhe’dlikemoreconversationongroup6.CommissionerSegelbaum CityofGoldenValley PlanningCommissionRegularMeeting August24,2020–7pm   8 statedhe’dliketochangethezoningandisn’tinfavorofitbeingIndustrial,asitcurrentlystands. Johnsonstatedsupportforvotingongroup6tonight.  KatherineSchlumpberger 2005GettysburgAveN Regarding9145Earlstreet,thestreetisshort,about4blocks.I’mcuriouswhatmighthappenat aboutthisaddressinthefuture.  Zimmermanansweredtheaddressisforstaffastheparcelhasnostreetaddress.Itisonthenorth portionoftheGeneralMillsNatureSite,it’swoodedandispartofthetabledconversationregarding theGMproperties.ResidentswillreceiveanotherletterbeforethatcomestoPlanningCommission again. ChairBlumclosedthepublichearingat9:31pm.  MOTIONwasmadebyCommissionerBrookinssecondedbyCommissionerBakertoapprovegroups 1,3Ͳ10inordertoachieveconformancewiththe2040Comprehensiveplan,andtotablegroup2for furtherdiscussion. Stafftookarollcallvoteandthemotionpassedunanimously. Televisedportionofthemeetingconcludedat9:35pm  6. CouncilLiaisonReport CouncilMemberRosenquistwasabsentsonoliaisonreportwasgiven.  7. ReportsonBoardofZoningAppealsandotherMeetings ZimmermanconfirmedthatCommissionersPocklandSegelbaumwouldattendtheBoardmeeting thismonth.  8. OtherBusiness CommissionerJohnsonofferedtobethePlanningCommissionrepresentativetotheFacilitiesAnalysis TaskForce.  9. Adjournment MOTIONbyCommissionerBrookinstoadjourn,secondedbyCommissionerSegelbaum,and approvedunanimously.Meetingadjournedat9:43pm.    ________________________________  AdamBrookins,Secretary ________________________________ AmieKolesar,PlanningAssistant   1      Date:  April 26, 2021  To:  Golden Valley Planning Commission  From:  Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager  Subject:  Informal Public Hearing – Future Land Use Map Amendment for 5300 Glenwood Ave      Applicant: ISD #270 ‐ Hopkins School District Property owner: Same  Zoning District: Office Lot size: 1.16 acres  Current use: Office building  Future land use: School (offices or classrooms)  Adjacent uses: School (west), Single‐family Residential (south), Hwy 100 (north and east)      2020 aerial photo (Hennepin County)        2    Summary of Request  Hopkins School District is petitioning to amend the City’s Future Land Use Map to guide the  property at 5300 Glenwood Avenue for Institutional ‐ Assembly use instead of the current guidance  as Office. In tandem with this action, the applicant also proposes to rezone the property from  Office to Institutional (I‐1). Additionally, the applicant is proposing to expand the existing Planned  Unit Development (PUD) consisting of Meadowbrook Elementary and the Davis Community Center  to include 5300 Glenwood and fully incorporate it into the campus.    Background and Existing Conditions  5300 Glenwood is a roughly one‐acre property containing a one‐story brick office building (though  because of changes in topography on the site, it appears to be two stories with a walkout  basement when viewed from the north). It was constructed in 1969 with a 6,400 square foot  footprint and was owned by the Boy Scouts of American for many years before being sold and  eventually purchased by the Hopkins School District in 2018.    The property sits between Highway 100 and the Meadowbrook Elementary School campus. The  entrance drive wraps around the building from Glenwood (to the south) to the parking lot to the  north. A narrow secondary drive provides access to the east parking lot of Meadowbrook School. In  2019, after an amendment to the Meadowbrook PUD that allowed for an major expansion along  the west side of the building, the school district instituted a new drop‐off/pick‐up circulation  pattern that involved utilizing the long driveway and access drive at 5300 Glenwood in an effort to  remove queueing from Glenwood and prevent congestion on the public right‐of‐way. These efforts  have been successful and the school district is now looking to fully incorporate this property into  the Meadowbrook campus.    Required Process  If the change in land use and zoning are both viewed favorably by the City Council, the  Metropolitan Council would also be required to review and approve the land use change as it  constitutes an amendment to the Future Land Use Map in the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The  proposed PUD amendment, which would expand the boundary of the existing PUD and incorporate  the 5300 Glenwood address, could move ahead for consideration by the City Council while this  process plays out, though final approval of a new PUD Permit would need to wait for final review  and approval by the Met Council.    Neighborhood Notification  The City’s adopted Neighborhood Notification Policy requires a neighborhood mailing be sent for  changes to the Future Land Use or Zoning maps. Because the proposed Major PUD Amendment for  this property required a neighborhood meeting be held, the three items were all addressed at one  virtual meeting held on April 7. No neighbors attended the meeting and to date staff have received  no comments on the land use change, the rezoning, or the PUD amendment.    Staff Review  The City Code does not set specific standards for changing a future land use designation, and the  City Council – with the input of the Planning Commission – has a great deal of latitude in deciding if  the request is consistent with the overall direction and vision of the Comprehensive Plan. In making      3    a determination, the City should take into account the land use descriptions outlined in the  Comprehensive Plan as well as any potential impacts on the character of the area.    For a baseline to this discussion, it is important to understand what both the existing and proposed  land uses entail and the expectations placed on those land uses in the Comprehensive Plan. The  2040 Comprehensive Plan has the following description of the Office land use:  This category includes offices for administrative, professional, and clerical services. This also  includes medical or laboratory facilities where work is performed in a predominantly office setting.  This land use is located near commercial, institutional, and high‐density residential areas and  generates employment in the community.    The Institutional ‐ Assembly land use is described as follows:  This category includes education facilities at all levels, the cemetery, places of worship for  all denominations, and miscellaneous religious installations.    The applicant has indicated that the building at 5300 Glenwood would mostly likely be used for  district offices or for special services educational programming. The office use would be consistent  with either the Office or the Institutional ‐ Assembly land use. Both the exiting and the proposed  uses appear to be compatible with the single‐family residential neighborhood to the south of  Glenwood Avenue.    Another important consideration for the reguiding and rezoning of the property is whether the  planning actions makes sense in a broader context of addressing the concerns raised by residents  when the Meadowbrook expansion was approved in 2018. At that point, the prospect of an  increase in the on‐site queueing space for drop‐off/pick‐up vehicles was welcomed. Incorporating  this property in to the school campus would allow that plan to come to fruition.    Traffic  It should be noted that the final use of the 5300 building has not yet been determined. Engineering  staff are conducting a traffic study to evaluate the capacity of the site to accommodate additional  vehicle trips – both at peak hours and at off‐peak hours. Any approval of a PUD amendment will  include assurances that the future use be tempered, if necessary, to avoid exacerbating congestion  issues.    Comprehensive Plan Consistency  Finally, staff reviewed the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan to help determine if this  reguiding action follows the intent of the City’s central guiding plan. Based on the application  materials, staff found the following goals and objectives to support the reguiding and incorporation  of the site into the Meadowbrook campus.    Land Use  1. Goal 2: Minimize Conflicts and Impacts Of Change ‐ Develop a regulatory framework  designed to minimize potential conflicts between land uses.      4    a. Objective 2 – Support non‐residential growth opportunities while respecting  adjacent properties  b. Objective 2.1 – Promote Planned Unit Developments as a way to achieve zoning  flexibility  c.   Transportation  1. Goal 2: Improve the Functionality and Safety of the Roadway Network – Improve mobility  for efficient movement of people and goods on the local and regional roadway network.  Improve safety for motorized and non‐motorized traffic  a. Objective 4 – Use Travel Demand Management (TDM) practices and land use  planning principles to reduce congestion and increase mobility   b. Objective 4.2 – Require development proposals with potential for significant traffic  impacts to prepare a traffic impact study or TDM plan and make improvements that  mitigate impacts determined in the study    Recommended Action  Based on the findings above, staff recommends approval of the requested amendment to the  Future Land Use Map, changing the guided land use for 5300 Glenwood Avenue from Office to  Institutional ‐ Assembly.     Attachments  Excerpt of Future Land Use Map (1 page)    Future Land Use Map        1      Date:  April 26, 2021  To:  Golden Valley Planning Commission  From:  Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager  Subject:  Informal Public Hearing – Zoning Map Amendment for 5300 Glenwood Avenue      Applicant: ISD #270 ‐ Hopkins School District Property owner: Same  Zoning District: Office Lot size: 1.16 acres  Current use: Office building  Future land use: School (offices or classrooms)  Adjacent uses: School (west), Single‐family Residential (south), Hwy 100 (north and east)      2020 aerial photo (Hennepin County)        2    Summary of Request  Hopkins School District is petitioning to rezone the property at 5300 Glenwood Avenue from Office  to Institutional (I‐1). In tandem with this action, the applicant also proposes to amend the City’s  Future Land Use map to guide the property for Institutional ‐ Assembly use instead of the current  guidance as Office. Additionally, the applicant is proposing to expand the existing Planned Unit  Development (PUD) consisting of Meadowbrook Elementary and the Davis Community Center to  include 5300 Glenwood and fully incorporate it into the campus.    Background & Existing Conditions  For details on the background of this rezoning request and the existing conditions of the site itself,  please refer to the accompanying memo on the proposed change in guided land use.     Staff Review  The City Code does not set forth specific standards for changing a zoning designation, and the City  Council – with the input of the Planning Commission – has a great deal of latitude in deciding if the  request can be considered to be consistent with the broader zoning map for the City. In making a  determination, the City should take into account the purpose of zoning as outlined in the City Code,  which is “to regulate land use within the City, including the location, size, use, and height of  buildings, the arrangement of buildings on lots, and the density of population within the City for  the purpose of promoting the health, safety, order, convenience, and general welfare of all citizens  of the City.” (Sec. 113‐2)    This rezoning request seeks to change the sites zoning from Office to Institutional (I‐1). The  purpose statements for both districts follow:    Office Zoning  The purpose of the Office Zoning District is to provide areas for the offices, clinics,  day care centers, financial institutions, and other compatible uses that serve local  and regional needs. The District fosters employment opportunities and  encourages transitions between land uses. The District is not intended to serve as  an area for the sale of or handling of goods, wares, merchandise, or commodities.    Institutional  The purpose of the Institutional Zoning District is to establish areas where both  public and private institutional uses such as schools, hospitals, parks, golf courses,  nursing homes, and public buildings may be located.    Allowed Uses  In the Office Zoning District, permitted uses include:  1. Offices  2. Clinics ‐ medical, dental, or optical  3. Financial institutions; and  4. Essential services, Class I.      3    Conditional uses include Adult Day Care Centers, Child Care Centers, Daytime Activity Centers  for disabled people, Drive‐through Facilities for Financial Institutions, Heliports (accessory to an  office), Limited Retail Service (accessory to an office), Recreational Facilities (accessory to an  office) and Laboratories.    The following principal uses are listed as permitted in the I‐1 Institutional Zoning Sub‐district:  1. Places of worship  2. Schools, public and parochial, excepting colleges, seminaries, and other institutions of  higher education  3. Essential services, Class I; and  4. Seasonal farm produce sales.    In addition to these four uses, Adult Day Care Centers, Child Care Centers, and Heliports are  permitted in the I‐1 district by conditional use permit.     Another important consideration is whether the rezoning is consistent with surrounding uses. Both  office and institutional uses are considered to have lower external impacts on surrounding  properties compared to industrial and commercial uses. That said, the conversion of the 5300  Glenwood property to a school use could mean additional traffic in the area. As noted in the  associated memo related to the proposed land use change, a traffic study (currently underway) will  assess the likelihood of any increase in congestion.    In this case, the change in zoning to Institutional (I‐1) is consistent with the adjacent institutional  properties west and complementary to the single‐family neighborhood to the south.    Staff Findings  The property under consideration is being rezoned to a use that would allow it to be fully  incorporated into the Meadowbrook campus and complete the vision that was developed in 2018  when the school building was expanded.    Given staff’s review, and weighing the opportunities and challenges provided by a change in  zoning, the following findings from staff are made in support of rezoning the property in question  to an Institutional (I‐1) designation:    1. The site is currently adjacent to a significant Institutional zoned property and would not be  out of character with the surrounding neighborhood.  2. While more study will be needed to determine if any constraints need to be placed on the  future uses of the property, Engineering staff is comfortable moving forward with the  rezoning knowing that the pending PUD amendment can include conditions to limit any  future impacts.   3. As noted in the accompanying memo on the site’s land use change, the use of this site for  an expansion of the Meadowbrook campus fits with a number of the goals and objectives of  the Comprehensive Plan.        4    Recommended Action  Based on the findings above, staff recommends approval of the requested amendment to the  Zoning Map, changing the zoning designation for 5300 Glenwood Avenue from Office to  Institutional (I‐1).    Attachments  Excerpt of Zoning Map (1 page)    Zoning Map        1      Date:  April 26, 2021  To:  Golden Valley Planning Commission  From:  Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager  Subject:    Informal Public Hearing – Meadowbrook School PUD No. 90, Amendment #5 –  5430 and 5300 Glenwood Avenue      Applicant: ISD #270 ‐ Hopkins School District Property owner: Same  Zoning District: Institutional (I‐1) and Office Proposed PUD size: 13.08 acres  Current use: School and office building  Future land use: School  Adjacent uses: Railroad/ponds (west), Residential and Church (south), Hwy 100 (north and east)     2020 aerial photo (Hennepin County)    2    Summary  Hopkins Public Schools, represented by Neil Tessier, is applying for a Major Planned Unit  Development (PUD) Amendment in order to expand the boundary of the PUD and to incorporate  additional land area currently addressed as 5300 Glenwood Avenue. This expansion would allow  for the completion of a traffic control plan initiated as part of Amendment #4 in 2018 as well as  provide future space for district offices or special services educational programming.    Background  PUD No. 90 was adopted by the City Council on December 19, 2000. The PUD was established to  allow the City and the School District to build the Davis Community Center following the  relocation of Turners Crossroad and Xenia Avenue. The first amendment to the PUD was  approved in May 2012 to allow a small addition to the building. The second amendment,  approved in November 2012, allowed for modifications to be made to the parking area. A third  amendment was approved in October 2013 to consolidate the Meadowbrook School parcel, the  Davis Community Center parcel, and the former Crisis Nursery parcel (which was connected to  the main school building via a newly constructed tunnel). The latest amendment (number five)  was approved in May 2018. This modification allowed for the addition of nine new classrooms on  the west side of the building and modified both the east and west parking lots as well as right‐of‐ way improvements with new turn lanes to improve traffic flow.    Existing Conditions  The size of the current Meadowbrook PUD is roughly 10.5 acres. It is bounded on the west by  Turners Crossroad North, on the east by Highway 100, and to the south by Glenwood Avenue. An  office building sits adjacent to the PUD to the east at 5300 Glenwood Avenue. This is the property  that would be included in the PUD if it is expanded.    The entire Meadowbrook School site is guided for Institutional use in the Comprehensive Plan and  is zoned Institutional (I‐1), the category reserved for schools and places of worship.    There are currently four access points to the school campus—two on Turners Crossroad and two on  Glenwood Avenue. The northern driveway on Turners provides access to the loading and unloading  area for buses. The southern driveway provides access to a small circular drive and parking area  which is utilized for student drop‐offs and pick‐ups for the school and the community center. Along  Glenwood, the western driveway is limited to exiting the site. All vehicles entering the site  (teachers, staff, and parents) currently utilize an eastern driveway that loops through the 5300  Glenwood property and threads its way through an upper and lower parking area.    Enrollment at the school is capped at 890 students through a condition of the existing PUD Permit.    Proposal  In response to feedback from the City as part of Amendment #4, the Hopkins School District  purchased 5300 Glenwood Avenue and has been testing a new circulation pattern for the eastern  parking lot. The new proposal would officially incorporate this property into the PUD. Separately,    3    the school district has submitted applications to change the land use and the zoning of this  property.    In addition to 5300 Glenwood, the expansion of the PUD would also include land along Highway  100, along Glenwood Avenue, and near the exit ramp from Highway 100 onto Glenwood. This  excess right‐of‐way is not needed by MnDOT, Hennepin County, or the City and would help to  ensure all school uses (such as the running track) are located on school grounds. The City supports  transferring responsibility for some existing infrastructure to the school as part of this  arrangement.    As part of this project, the parking lot at 5300 would be improved to provide a more direct  circulation pattern and better capture and treat stormwater runoff. New lighting and landscaping  around the parking lot would also be provided.    The existing narrow drive that connects the two properties would be widened and improved to  create a direct route for queueing vehicles. The northeast corner of the existing east Meadowbrook  lot would also be expanded slightly in order to recapture some of the parking stalls lost during this  realignment. Overall, between the two parking lots, the parking count would drop from 211 to 197.    As a carry‐over from the last PUD amendment, the school has also provided a letter confirming the  process for verifying student enrollment annually as well as a description of the site logistics for  drop‐offs and pick‐ups of students.    Finally, the applicant has provided a deposit for the City’s traffic engineering consultant to evaluate  the current traffic levels and ensure that future use of the 5300 building by the school district will  not generate congestion on Glenwood Avenue.    Neighborhood Notification  The City’s adopted Neighborhood Notification Policy requires a neighborhood meeting to share any  proposal for a Major PUD Amendment. A virtual meeting that addressed the PUD amendment, the  proposed land use change, and the rezoning was held on April 7. No neighbors attended the  meeting and to date staff have received no comments.    Evaluation  Land Use and Zoning Considerations  As a PUD, the City can offer flexibility from the regular zoning requirements in order to achieve a  better development. With the inclusion of 5300 Glenwood Avenue and the adjacent excess rights‐ of‐way along Highway 100 and Glenwood Avenue, very little additional flexibility is being requested  on the part of the City. The primary modification would be the expansion of the drive between the  Meadowbrook campus and the 5300 parcel. This paved connection would not be allowed outside  of a PUD, but as part of the development provides an extended circulation pattern that is a benefit  to the City in that it keeps vehicles from queueing on Glenwood Avenue at peak drop‐off and pick‐ up times.      4    Additionally, some interior parking setbacks would continue to be less that what the zoning  requirements would be for institutional‐zoned properties (25 feet), but because these represent a  setback internal to the PUD there are no impacts to surrounding property owners.    Changes to the amounts of impervious surfaces (32.09% without the 5300 property and 32.78%  with it included) and open space (44.86% without the 5300 property and 44.17% with it included)  are also negligible.    In summary, the inclusion of the 5300 Glenwood property has no discernable impact on the overall  conformance to the usual Institutional requirements, has great benefit to those traveling along  Glenwood Avenue, and requires only one primary concession in terms of zoning flexibility on the  part of the City.    Traffic  A major impetus for the inclusion of the 5300 Glenwood property into the Meadowbrook PUD is  the ability to relieve congestion on Glenwood Avenue by increasing the length of the queueing  lanes. The concept of utilizing the long driveway at 5300 and improving the existing internal  connection between the two properties was supported by the Planning Commission and City  Council during the review process for Amendment #4 in 2018. An informal test of this arrangement  has shown to remove traffic queues from Glenwood Avenue during regular conditions – though it  should be noted that traffic congestion did occur during the initial return to school phase of the  2020‐21 school year as many parents avoided sending their children to/from school on buses.  Operations have since been optimized and the problems have been alleviated.    In order to ensure the future use by the school district of the 5300 building does not add to traffic  concerns, a traffic study is currently underway to evaluate how much capacity might exist during  peak drop‐off and pick‐up times. Should the results of this study indicate likely problems, the City  retains the right to curtail the use or the hours of operation at this location.    Stormwater  New stormwater management in the form of an underground treatment area would be  constructed under the parking lot at 5300 Glenwood, along with improvements to other  surrounding infrastructure. Additional details and requirements are included in the Engineering  comments below.    Lighting  New lighting for the parking lot at 5300 and the edge of the east parking lot for Meadowbrook is  proposed as part of the improvements associated with this PUD amendment. As submitted, some  lighting levels on the plans exceed the allowances of the City’s “dark skies” outdoor lighting  standards. Adjustments will be required prior to the approval of the PUD Permit by the City  Council.          5    Landscaping  The proposed landscaping plans primarily focus on the 5300 Glenwood property, but do include  some plantings along the eastern edge of the current Meadowbrook campus. Staff review confirms  the required one‐for‐one replacement of planted and significant trees and shrubs has been met,  with 16 new trees, 20 new shrubs, and 15 new perennials replacing 12 identified tree removals.  Additional review and possible adjustments to species or locations will be conducted as part of the  Tree and Landscape Permit process near the end of construction.    Platting  In addition to replatting the two properties in order to consolidate them into one PUD, additional  land is intended to be incorporated by obtaining areas along Highway 100, along Glenwood  Avenue, and near the exit ramp from Highway 100 (including the existing driveway to 5300  Glenwood). The school is also required to provide new walkway easements for a public trail along  Glenwood Ave that veers onto its property.    Enrollment and Operations  In response to conditions placed on Meadowbrook as part of Amendment #4, the school district  has provided confirmation that enrollment continues to remain below the maximum allowed level  of 890 students and has also outlined a process for sharing this information with the City annually.    Engineering and Fire Safety Considerations  As is standard practice for development proposals, plans were reviewed by the City’s Engineering  staff and the following notes were provided:   The school is required to provide walkway easements, to be recorded as separate  documents, for any trail along Glenwood that is within the school property. The school  should provide exhibits and legal description (two feet north of trail edge) and the City  will prepare documents. This was a condition of previous PUD approvals for this site.   The ROW layout is subject to the review and approval of Hennepin County and MnDOT.   City will vacate any interest it has in the MnDOT turnback area over a portion of the east  driveway entrance and along the east side of PUD, with the exception that drainage and  utility easements will be retained (or must be dedicated on the plat) for any areas with  City utilities present. Any and all infrastructure within this vacation area would be owned  and maintained by the school district and included in the maintenance agreement  executed between the City and the school.   The proposed project requires BCWMC review of the erosion and sediment control plan.  The City will need evidence of BCWMC approval before City permits are issued.   The proposal requires plat review by MnDOT and Hennepin County. The stormwater  report and plan require review and a permit application from MnDOT for changes  proposed to the storm sewer/stormwater system that drains to MnDOT’s system within  the Highway 100 corridor. The City will need evidence of MnDOT review and permit  issuance before City permits are issued.    6     If construction dewatering and pumping is required, the City will need to see evidence of  permits and approvals from MnDNR and other applicable agencies before City permits are  issued.   The existing stormwater maintenance agreement for the Meadowbrook site will need to  be updated as part of this PUD Amendment. The City will prepare all documents for  review and signatures. The district’s existing chloride management plan for Meadowbrook  will need to be updated and included as part of this maintenance agreement.    The Fire Department reviewed this proposal for adequate emergency access and public safety  requirements and had no concerns.    Anticipated Development Timeline  Construction is planned to take place in June through August of 2020. Future interior remodeling of  the 5300 Glenwood building would likely take place at a future date once the final use has been  determined.    Findings  In order approve an amendment to a PUD, the City must be able to make certain findings as  outlined in Section 113‐123, Subd. (c)(2) of the City Code. These findings, along with staff  responses, are listed below:  Quality Site Planning. The PUD plan must be tailored to the specific characteristics of the site  and achieve a higher quality of site planning and design than generally expected under  conventional provisions of the zoning chapter.  The PUD amendment is tailored to the specific characteristics of the site by providing a  beneficial circulation plan that ensures vehicles are queueing off of the public right‐of‐way to  avoid creating back‐ups and congestion on Glenwood Avenue. Other improvements to the  parking lot provide a needed update to older infrastructure.  Preservation. The PUD plan must preserve and protect substantial desirable portions of the  site’s characteristics, open space, and sensitive environmental features including steep  slopes, trees, scenic views, creeks, wetlands, and open waters.  Minimal tree removal required as part of the project is mitigated through replanting. No  sensitive site features are impacted.  Efficient; Effective. The PUD plan must include efficient and effective use of the land (which  includes preservation).  The proposed amendment would utilize land efficiently by consolidating nearby excess right‐ of‐way and opening up an existing building for additional school operations.  Consistency. The PUD plan must result in development that is compatible with adjacent uses  and consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and redevelopment plans and goals.  The proposal is consistent with the current use of the existing PUD and there are no known  impacts to the surrounding residential neighborhood. The proposal is consistent with the  City’s Comprehensive Plan, which calls for the support of non‐residential growth  opportunities and utilizing the PUD process as a way to achieve zoning flexibility.    7    General Health. The PUD plan must be consistent with preserving and improving the general  health, safety, and welfare of the people of the city.  The PUD amendment would improve general health by providing water quality  improvements to the Sweeney Lake sub‐watershed through new stormwater management  infrastructure, and would improve safety and welfare by ensuring continued improvements  to the traffic flow on Glenwood Avenue.  Meets Requirements. The PUD plan must meet the intent and purpose provisions of Section  113‐123 as well as all other provisions.  The creativity and flexibility provided under the PUD section of the Zoning Code allows for  the coordinated use of a long driveway across two properties in order to provide congestion  reduction. The PUD amendment meets the Intent and Purpose provision of the City Code in  that it creates a public benefit in exchange for this flexibility.    Recommendation  Based on review of the materials submitted and the findings above, staff recommends approval of  Amendment #5 to Meadowbrook School PUD No. 90, subject to the following conditions:    1. The photometric plans must be updated to conform to City standards for lighting levels and  shall be reviewed and approved by staff prior to the issuance of building permits.  2. Information on enrollment, staffing, and program activities shall be provided to the City  annually by October 1st or more frequently if changes are proposed or anticipated. Additional  enrollment, or changes to staffing or programming, may only occur in concert with the  construction of additional comprehensive traffic management solutions.  3. The City reserves the right to curtail certain uses or hours of operation for the 5300 Glenwood  Avenue building pending the results of the ongoing traffic study in order to manage on  Glenwood Avenue.  4. A financial guarantee shall be submitted to the City to ensure all title work is completed and  the final plat is recorded with Hennepin County.  5. Walkway easements for any trail along Glenwood that is within the school property shall be  recorded as separate documents. The school shall provide exhibits and legal description (two  feet north of trail edge) and the City will prepare documents.  6. The City will vacate any interest it has in the MnDOT turnback area over a portion of the east  driveway entrance and along the east side of PUD, with the exception that drainage and  utility easements will be retained (or must be dedicated on the plat) for any areas with City  utilities present. Any and all infrastructure within this vacation area would be owned and  maintained by the school district and included in the maintenance agreement executed  between the City and the school.  7. The existing stormwater maintenance agreement for the Meadowbrook site shall be updated  as part of this PUD Amendment. The City will prepare all documents for review and  signatures. The district’s existing chloride management plan for Meadowbrook shall be  updated and included as part of this maintenance agreement.    This approval is subject to all other state, federal, and local ordinances, regulations, or laws with  authority over this development.    8      Attachments  Project Narrative (3 pages)  Student Enrollment and Site Logistics Letter (2 pages)  Plans received March 2, 2021, and updated April 16, 2021 (13 pages)    SAFEngineering Site and Athletic Facility Engineering, PLLC 3200 122nd Avenue NE Blaine, MN 55449 March 17, 2021 Mr. Jason Zimmerman Planning Manager City of Golden Valley 7800 Golden Valley Road Golden Valley, MN 55427 RE: ISD #270 - Meadowbrook ES Parking Lot Improvements - PUD Narrative Letter In accordance with the City of Golden Valley PUD Major Amendment requirements, we are pleased to provide the following narrative per your request for additional information letter dated March 12, 2021. PUD NARRATIVE 1. The City of Golden Valley PUD Section of the City Code, Section 113-123. A. The current zoning of the eastern portion of the property is Business. The School District purchased the eastern portion of the property, formerly the Boy Scout building and other business operations, and would like to change the zoning to Institutional. B. The existing school owned property, western portion of the site, has two buildings connected together with an underground tunnel. This portion of the property is zoned Institutional. Both properties will be combined into one parcel, with dedicated easements for utilities, paths and wetlands. The final plat and zoning will be Institutional. C. The new site plans and future use of the newly acquired building meet the Intent and Purposes of the PUD. a. Quality Site Planning: The plans have been specifically tailored to provide maximum auto traffic queuing to improve the characteristics of the site. Significant storm water systems have been designed to improve water quality. Landscaping has been designed to improve the aesthetics of the site. New site lighting has been designed to improve the safety of the site. b. Preservation: The new design minimizes the impact to the natural landscape. A minimum number of trees were removed and will be replaced with better quality trees and in locations to improve the aesthetics of the site as well as additional landscaping. Significant storm water systems have been designed to improve water quality. SAFEngineering Site and Athletic Facility Engineering, PLLC 3200 122nd Avenue NE Blaine, MN 55449 c. Efficient, Effective: The new design minimizes the impact to the natural landscape. A minimum number of trees were removed and will be replaced with better quality trees and in locations to improve the aesthetics of the site as well as additional landscaping. The new footprint of the hard surfaced areas was minimized and closely matched the existing hard surfaced areas. d. Consistency: The new use of the building is more compatible with the overall site. The newly acquired building will be educational based and fits in better than the previously Building zoning and usage by the previous owner. The new Institutional zoning is more consistent with the other portion of the property. e. General Health: The new use of the building will definitely improve the safety of the property and City. The new expanded drive lanes will permit more vehicles on site to significantly increase the queue for morning drop off and afternoon pick-up of students. This will remove cars from the City streets, creating a safer environment for the residents of Golden Valley. e. General Health: The PUD plan meets the Intent and Purpose of all required sections of PUD Section 113-123. The rational for combining the properties into one is for the benefit of the community and the School District to provide for an exceptional educational facility to serve the needs of the residents of the City of Golden Valley. D. The overall concept for the School District property is multi-faceted. The main purpose of the site is for the educational benefit of the students and community of the City of Golden Valley who attend the many functions of the property. The properties main buildings are used for elementary school education. The other buildings provide daycare as well as educational services. There is a community center within the main building utilized for a wide variety of educational opportunities for all members of the community. The newly acquired building will be renovated. The intent of the renovation is unknown at this time. However, it will be utilized for either School District offices, special services educational programming or a combination of both. 2. The existing footprint for the western portion of the property is as follows: A. Main Building: 109,000 Square Feet B. Secondary Building: 8,000 Square Feet C. New Building: 6,400 Square Feet D. West Property: 458,662 Square Feet; 10.53 Acres E. East Property: 94,150 Square Feet; 2.16 Acres SAFEngineering Site and Athletic Facility Engineering, PLLC 3200 122nd Avenue NE Blaine, MN 55449 3. The School District will provide annual enrollment figures for all three buildings on an annual basis. The current enrollment numbers are as follows: A. Main and Secondary Buildings: 845 pupils and 100 staff B. New Building: TBD The current operational logistics for the site are as follows: A. All Buildings: 100% of all bused students utilize the North Lot 25% of all parent dropped off students utilize the West Lot drop off lane. 75% of all parent dropped off students utilize the East Lots drop off lanes. 4. The proposed new plat will include all legal descriptions and easements. Please see the attached document. 5. We will coordinate a Neighborhood Meeting with all required residents. We appreciate the assistance from the City in coordinating the meeting. SUMMARY If you have any questions, please contact me at your convenience via email or phone. SAFEngineering, PLLC Neil Tessier, P.E. CEO SAFEngineering Site and Athletic Facility Engineering, PLLC 3200 122nd Avenue NE Blaine, MN 55449 March 23, 2021 Mr. Jason Zimmerman Planning Manager City of Golden Valley 7800 Golden Valley Road Golden Valley, MN 55427 RE: ISD #270 - Meadowbrook ES Parking Lot Improvements – Student and Staff Enrollment and Site Logistics Letter In accordance with the City of Golden Valley PUD Major Amendment requirements, we are pleased to provide the following information relating to your email dated March 23, 2021, in advance of the City of Golden Valley Planning Commission meeting on April 26, 2021. STUDENT AND STAFF ENROLLMENT AND SITE LOGISTICS INFORMATION 1. The current enrollment figures for 2021: Students: 845 Staff: 100 2. ISD #270 staff will provide the numbers to the City of Golden Valley under the following procedures: A. The Director of Buildings and Grounds will provide a letter with the enrollment and staff numbers to the City Planner. B. The City Planner can distribute the information to those in the City of Golden Valley deemed necessary to have the information. C. The letter will be presented to the City of Golden Valley once all official numbers are tabulated. The letter will be delivered no later than October 1st of each calendar year. D. ISD #270 has entered into an agreement with the City of Golden Valley to not exceed the enrollment numbers from the last PUD amendment. They intend to honor that agreement. 3. Student access to the building for the 2021 school year is as follows: A. Door O and N (North side of school): 475 students on buses B. Door A (West side of school): 90 students by parents C. Door L (East side of school): 280 students by parents 4. Student grade level per door access to the building for the 2021 school year is as follows: SAFEngineering Site and Athletic Facility Engineering, PLLC 3200 122nd Avenue NE Blaine, MN 55449 A. Door O and N (North side of school): K through 6th B. Door A (West side of school): 5th and 6th C. Door L (East side of school): K through 4th 5. Staff access to the building for the 2021 school year is as follows: A. Door A (West side of school): 10 staff B. Door L (East side of school): 90 staff 6. The arrival times for the 2021 school year are as follows: A. Bus hours: 9:15AM – 9:30AM drop off 3:55PM – 4:10PM pick up B. Parent hours: 9:15AM – 9:30AM drop off 3:30PM – 4:10PM pick up C. Staff hours: 7:00AM – 5:00PM 7. ISD #270 staff will work with the City of Golden Valley if any procedural changes are required to the logistics plan outlined in this letter. SUMMARY If you have any questions, please contact me at your convenience. SAFEngineering, PLLC Neil Tessier, P.E. CEO Feb 22, 2021 - 1:19pm - User:jworkman L:\PROJECTS\21672.01\CAD\Civil\Sheets\21672.01 - C1 - TITLE.dwg C1.01 TITLE DEVELOPER/OWNER INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 270 1001 HIGHWAY 7 HOPKINS, MN 55305 TEL 952-988-4000 FAX 952-988-4092 CONTACT: CIVIL ENGINEER SAFENGINEERING 3200 122ND AVENUE NE BLAINE, MN 55449 TEL 612-213-9859 CONTACT: NEIL TESSIER, PE. SURVEYOR CORNERSTONE LAND SURVEYING, INC. 6750 STILLWATER, BLVD. NORTH SUITE #1 STILLWATER, MN 55082 TEL 651-275-8969 FAX 651-275-8976 CONTACT: DAN THURMES SHEET INDEX SHEET DESCRIPTION C1.01 TITLE --SURVEY - 5430 GLENWOOD AVENUE --TREE INVENTORY --PROPOSED PLAT C2.02 DEMO PLAN - EAST PARKING LOT C3.01 SITE PLAN - EAST PARKING LOT C4.01 GRADING PLAN - EAST PARKING LOT C5.01 EROSION CONTROL PLAN - EAST PARKING LOT C5.02 SWPPP NARRATIVE C5.03 SWPPP NARRATIVE L1.01 LANDSCAPE PLAN - EAST PARKING LOT C9.01 DETAILS C9.02 DETAILS C9.03 DETAILS 12 OF 12 SUBSURFACE TREATMENT SYSTEM DETAILS ( ADS) 4 OF 4 SITE LIGHTING PLAN Meadowbrook Elementary School Parking Lot Improvements SAFEngineering Golden Valley, Minnesota Presented by: NO SCALE VICINITY MAP SITE CONSULTANT CONTACT LIST: N.T.S. Project Location Date Submittal / RevisionNo. Certification Sheet Title Summary Revision History Sheet No.Revision Project No. By Designed:Drawn: Approved:Book / Page: Phase:Initial Issue: ClientISD # 270 MEADOWBROOKELEMENTARYPARKING LOTIMPROVEMENTS GOLDENVALLEY, MN 5430 GLENWOOD AVE. NT JRW NT PRELIM.1/11/2021 21672.01 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SET OF PLANS ANDSPECIFICATIONS WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDERMY DIRECT SUPERVISION, AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. NEIL TESSIER, PE. DATE REGISTRATION NO. 2/22/2021 26364 SAFEngineering, PLLC Site and Athletic Facility Engineering 3200 122nd Ave. NEBlaine, MN 55449612-213-9859nrtessier@gmail.comISD #270 GLENWOOD AVENUE 394 55 100 ELECTRICAL MUSCO 20892 HARTFORD WAY LAKEVILLE, MN 55044 TEL 612-368-9286 CONTACT: SCOTT PEITZ TRUNK HIGHWAY NO. 100GLENWOOD AVENUEPARCEL 1PARCEL 1PARCEL 2LEGEND:PID#1902924330007CONTACT:SAFEngineering, PLLCNeil Tessier, PE3200 122nd Avenue NEBlaine, MN 55449612-213-9859nrtessier@gmail.comLHB12013DSURVLHB13DEXISTING CONDITIONSSURVEYCOUNTY/CITY:REVISIONS:PROJECT LOCATION:LAND SURVEYING, INC.CORNERSTONESuite #2001970 Northwestern AveStillwater, MN 55082Phone 651.275.8969Fax 651.275.8976dan@cssurvey.netDATEREVISIONPROJECT NO.FILE NAME5300GLENWOOD AVECITY OF GOLDEN VALLEYHENNEPINCOUNTY10-25-19 INITIAL ISSUECERTIFICATION:I hereby certify that this plan was prepared byme, or under my direct supervision, and that I ama duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws ofthe state of Minnesota.Daniel L. Thurmes Registration Number: 25718Date:__________________MEADOWBROOKELEMENTARYSCHOOLPID#19029243300195400GLENWOOD AVEPID#33118213400545430GLENWOOD AVE0NORTH40 80SHEET 2 OF 3SEE SHEET 3 OF 3 SHEETSFOR TREE INFORMATION10-25-19CALL BEFORE YOU DIG!TWIN CITY AREA:TOLL FREE:1-800-252-1166651-454-0002Gopher State One CallUNDERGROUND ELECTRICUNDERGROUND CABLE TVUNDERGROUND FIBER OPTICUNDERGROUND TELEPHONEOVERHEAD UTILITYUNDERGROUND GASSANITARY SEWERSTORM SEWERWATERMAINFENCECURB [TYPICAL]CONTOURSBITUMINOUS SURFACECONCRETE SURFACEGRAVEL SURFACEFOUND MONUMENTSET 1/2" IRON PIPEMARKED RLS NO. 25718CABLE TV PEDESTALAIR CONDITIONERELECTRIC MANHOLEELECTRIC METERELECTRIC PEDESTALELECTRIC TRANSFORMERLIGHT POLEGUY WIREPOWER POLEGAS MANHOLEGAS METERTELEPHONE MANHOLETELEPHONE PEDESTALSANITARY CLEANOUTSANITARY MANHOLECATCH BASINSTORM DRAINFLARED END SECTIONSTORM MANHOLEFIRE DEPT. CONNECTIONHYDRANTCURB STOPWATER WELLWATER MANHOLEWATER METERPOST INDICATOR VALVEWATER VALVEBOLLARDFLAG POLEMAIL BOXTRAFFIC SIGNUNKNOWN MANHOLESOIL BORINGSPOT ELEVATIONTRAFFIC SIGNALCONIFEROUS TREEDECIDUOUS TREE PID#1902924330007 CONTACT: SAFEngineering, PLLCNeil Tessier, PE 3200 122nd Avenue NEBlaine, MN 55449612-213-9859nrtessier@gmail.com VICINITY MAP COUNTY/CITY: REVISIONS: PROJECT LOCATION: DATE REVISION 5300GLENWOOD AVE CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY HENNEPINCOUNTY 5400 PID#1902924330019GLENWOOD AVE 10-25-19 INITIAL ISSUE CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that this plan was prepared byme, or under my direct supervision, and that I ama duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws ofthe state of Minnesota. Daniel L. Thurmes Registration Number: 25718 Date:__________________ MEADOWBROOK ELEMENTARY LHB12013D SURVLH13D EXISTING CONDITIONSSURVEY LAND SURVEYING, INC.CORNERSTONE Suite #2001970 Northwestern AveStillwater, MN 55082Phone 651.275.8969Fax 651.275.8976dan@cssurvey.net PROJECT NO. FILE NAME 1 Acer spp Maple 8 2 Betula nigra River Birch 6 3 Betula nigra River Birch 6 4 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 3 Multi Stem 5 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple Multi Stem 6 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple Multi Stem 7 Pinus sylvestris Scots Pine 4 8 Pinus sylvestris Scots Pine 4 9 Pinus sylvestris Scots Pine 4 10 Malus spp Ornamental Crab Apple 2 11 Malus spp Ornamental Crab Apple 2 12 Malus spp Ornamental Crab Apple 2 13 Sorbus spp Ornamental Mountain Ash 2 14 Sorbus spp Ornamental Mountain Ash 2 15 Sorbus spp Ornamental Mountain Ash 2 16 Sorbus spp Ornamental Mountain Ash 2 17 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 3 Multi Stem 18 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 3 Multi Stem 19 Salix spp Willow Spp Multi Stem 20 Betula nigra River Birch 6 Multi Stem 21 Betula nigra River Birch 24 Multi Stem 22 Betula nigra River Birch 6 Multi Stem 23 Fraxinus spp Ash 30 24 Malus spp Crab Apple 8 25 Malus spp Crab Apple 8 26 Fraxinus spp Ash 30 27 Magnolia spp Magnolia 2 28 Magnolia spp Magnolia 2 29 Magnolia spp Magnolia 2 30 Acer spp Maple 12 31 Malus spp Apple Tree- Fruit 6 32 Betula papyrifera Paper Birch Multi Stem 33 Betula papyrifera Paper Birch Multi Stem 34 Quercus macrocarpa Bur Oak 30 35 Pinus sylvestris Scots Pine 2 36 Pinus sylvestris Scots Pine 18 37 Fraxinus spp Ash 30 38 Celtis occidentalis Hackberry 6 39 Pinus sylvestris Scots Pine 24 40 Pinus sylvestris Scots Pine 24 41 Pinus sylvestris Scots Pine 15 42 Fraxinus spp Ash 24 43 Betula papyrifera Paper Birch 6 Multi Stem 44 Betula papyrifera Paper Birch 6 Multi Stem 45 Betula papyrifera Paper Birch 6 Multi Stem 46 Pinus sylvestris Scots Pine 12 47 Quercus rubra Red Oak 5 48 Pinus spp Pine 6 49 Betula nigra River Birch 6 Multi Stem 50 Pinus resinosa Red Pine 8 51 Pinus resinosa Red Pine 8 52 Fraxinus spp Ash 6 53 Fraxinus spp Ash 6 54 Fraxinus spp Ash 6 55 Pinus resinosa Red Pine 8 56 Pinus resinosa Red Pine 6 57 Pinus resinosa Red Pine 6 58 Quercus rubra Pin Oak 6 59 Quercus macrocarpa Bur Oak 4 60 Betula nigra River Birch 4 Multi Stem 61 Betula nigra River Birch 4 Multi Stem 62 Betula nigra River Birch 4 Multi Stem 63 Acer spp Maple 5 64 Acer spp Maple 5 65 Acer spp Maple 5 66 Acer spp Maple 5 67 Picea spp Spruce 6 68 Pinus spp Pine 6 69 Celtis occidentalis Hackberry 5 70 Ulmus thomasii Rock Elm 10 71 Acer spp Maple 2 72 Acer spp Maple 2 73 Acer spp Maple 2 74 Acer spp Maple 2 75 Robinia spp Locust Multi Stem 76 Robinia spp Locust 5 77 Robinia spp Locust 7 78 Tilia spp Linden 1 79 Robinia spp Locust 8 80 Robinia spp Locust 10 81 Picea spp Spruce 15 Half Dead 82 Tilia spp Linden 6 83 Tilia spp Linden 6 84 Tilia spp Linden 36 85 Tilia spp Linden 6 86 Tilia spp Linden 8 87 Ulmus thomasii Rock Elm 7 88 Ulmus thomasii Rock Elm 4 89 Amur Chockcherry Amur Chockcherry 4 90 Fraxinus spp Ash 12 91 N/A N/A 92 Fraxinus spp Ash 12 93 Malus spp Crab Apple 8 Multi Stem 94 Fraxinus spp Ash 10 95 Tilia spp Linden 4 96 Fraxinus spp Ash 18 97 Celtis occidentalis Hackberry 12 98 Fraxinus spp Ash 12 99 Syringa reticulata Tree Lilac 6 100 Picea spp Spruce 6 101 Abies balsamea Balsam Fir 6 102 Fraxinus spp Ash 24 103 Malus spp Crab Apple Multi Stem 104 Malus spp Crab Apple Multi Stem 105 Malus spp Crab Apple 6 Multi Stem 106 Malus spp Crab Apple 6 107  Acer negundo Box Elder 12 108 Celtis occidentalis Hackberry 10 109 Celtis occidentalis Hackberry 8 110 Celtis occidentalis Hackberry 8 111 Celtis occidentalis Hackberry 6 112 N/A N/A 113 Celtis occidentalis Hackberry 8 114 Malus spp Crab Apple 5 115 Celtis occidentalis Hackberry 6 116 Quercus spp Oak 8 117 Robinia spp Locust 10 118 Ulmus thomasii Rock Elm 8 119 Betula nigra River Birch 4 Multi Stem 120 Betula nigra River Birch 4 Multi Stem 121 Betula nigra River Birch 4 Multi Stem 122 Betula nigra River Birch 4 Multi Stem 123 Betula nigra River Birch 4 Multi Stem 124 Betula nigra River Birch 4 Multi Stem 125 Betula nigra River Birch 4 Multi Stem 126 Betula nigra River Birch 4 Multi Stem 127 Betula nigra River Birch 4 Multi Stem 128 Betula nigra River Birch 4 Multi Stem 129 Betula nigra River Birch 4 Multi Stem 130 Betula nigra River Birch 4 Multi Stem 131 Betula nigra River Birch 4 Multi Stem 132 Fraxinus spp Ash 24 Mostly Dead 133  Acer negundo Box Elder 6 134 Betula nigra River Birch 6 Multi Stem 135 Betula nigra River Birch 6 Multi Stem 136 Picea spp Spruce 8 901 Prunus spp.Crab Apple 4 902 Prunus spp.Crab Apple 4 903 Prunus spp.Crab Apple 4 904 Prunus spp.Crab Apple 4 905 Prunus spp.Crab Apple 3 906 Prunus spp.Crab Apple 5 907 Prunus spp.Crab Apple 6 908 Prunus spp.Crab Apple 9 909 Prunus spp.Crab Apple 9 910 Fraxinus spp.Ash 10 911 Fraxinus spp.Ash 9 912 Acer plataniodes Norway Maple 8 913 Acer plataniodes Norway Maple 8 914 Acer plataniodes Norway Maple 9 915 Acer spp.Maple 4 916 Picea pungens Blue Spruce 7 917 Prunus spp.Crab Apple 4 918 Prunus spp.Crab Apple 4 919 Picea pungens Blue Spruce 8 920 Picea pp.Spruce 6 921 Picea pungens Blue Spruce 8 922 Acer spp.Maple 4 923 Acer spp.Maple 5 924 Picea pungens Blue Spruce 7 925 Picea spp.Spruce 5 926 Picea pungens Blue Spruce 6 927 Tilia cordata Small Leaf Linden 4 928 Acer saccarinum Silver Maple 16/14 Double 929 Picea pungens Blue Spruce 6 930 Picea spp.Spruce 8 931 Picea spp.Spruce 6 932 Picea pungens Blue Spruce 6 933 Populus deltoides Cottonwood 30 934 Populus deltoides Cottonwood 18/18/20 Triple 935 Fraxinus spp.Ash 12 936 Fraxinus spp.Ash 9/5 Twin 937 Populus deltoides Cottonwood 16 938 Fraxinus spp.Ash 10 939 Fraxinus spp.Ash 6 940 Populus deltoides Cottonwood 20 941 Populus deltoides Cottonwood 29 942 Fraxinus spp.Ash 8 943 Acer negundo Box Elder 15 Dead 944 Populus deltoides Cottonwood 18 945 Acer negundo Box Elder 11/12 Twin 946 Populus deltoides Cottonwood 10/10 Twin 947 Populus deltoides Cottonwood 12 948 Populus deltoides Cottonwood 21/26/32 Triple SCHOOL 10-25-19 5430 PID#3311821340054GLENWOOD AVE TR U N K H I G H W A Y N O . 1 0 0 GLENWOOD AV E N U E TEMPORARYCURBS18A LIGHT POLE & FOOTING18A TREES 18A TREES 18A METAL RING18A BITUMINOUS18A TEMPORARY CURBS18A TURF18A CURB & GUTTER 18A CURB &GUTTER 18ASAWCUT SAWCUT BITUMINOUS18A CURB & GUTTER18A STORMWATER STRUCTURES19A SHELTER18A CONCRETE18A LIGHT POLE & FOOTING18A LIGHT POLE & FOOTING18ASTORMWATER CMP 19ALIGHT POLE & FOOTING18A CURB &GUTTER18A FES &RIP-RAP19A TREES18A FES & RIP-RAP18A WALL 19A CONCRETE18A CONCRETE19A SAWCUT RETAININGWALLS19A TEMPORARYCURBS18A TEMPORARYCURBS18A BITUMINOUS18A FES & RIP-RAP18A UTLITIES19A UTILITES19A FES 18A TURF18A TURF18A BITUMINOUS18A CURB &GUTTER18A 18A 10' OF 15" RCP18A 10' OF12" RCP18A 10' OF18" CMP18A BOULDERS18A FES 19A PLANTERS18A TREES18A CLEANOUT20A CLEANOUT20A SAWCUT 4' FROM BACK OF CURB UTILITIES19A UTILITIES19A BASINS20A SCALE IN FEET 0 6030 NORTH Feb 22, 2021 - 1:20pm - User:jworkman L:\PROJECTS\21672.01\CAD\Civil\Sheets\21672.01 - C2 - DEMO.dwg C2.02 DEMO PLAN -EAST PARKINGLOT Project Location Date Submittal / RevisionNo. Certification Sheet Title Summary Revision History Sheet No.Revision Project No. By Designed:Drawn: Approved:Book / Page: Phase:Initial Issue: ClientISD # 270 MEADOWBROOKELEMENTARYPARKING LOTIMPROVEMENTS GOLDENVALLEY, MN 5430 GLENWOOD AVE. NT JRW NT PRELIM.1/11/2021 21672.01 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SET OF PLANS ANDSPECIFICATIONS WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDERMY DIRECT SUPERVISION, AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. NEIL TESSIER, PE. DATE REGISTRATION NO. 2/22/2021 26364 SAFEngineering, PLLC Site and Athletic Facility Engineering 3200 122nd Ave. NEBlaine, MN 55449612-213-9859nrtessier@gmail.com LEGEND UNDERGROUND GAS STONE RETAINING WALL CHAIN LINK FENCE WOOD FENCE IRON FENCE WIRE FENCE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND CABLE TV UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE OVERHEAD ELECTRIC SANITARY SEWER FORCE MAIN WATERMAIN DRAIN TILE STORM SEWER LIGHT HYDRANT GAS METER SPRINKLER HEAD SPRINKLER VALVE GUARD RAIL HANDRAIL EDGE OF TREES TREES / SHRUBS CONCRETE GUARD POLES SIGNS CONCRETE CURB BITUMINOUS CURB BUILDING SAW CUT EXIST BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT REMOVE EXISTING UTILITY LINE EXISTING REMOVE BY CONTRACTOR KEYNOTES 18A SAVE IN PLACE19A ADJUST BY CONTRACTOR20A ADJUST BY OWNER21A NO PARKINGNO PARKINGPROPOSED R/W V A C A T I O N PROPOSED R/W E A S E M E N T V A C A T I O N PR O P O S E D D R A I N A G E A N D U T I L I T Y E A S E M E N T A R E AWE T L A N D TR U N K H I G H W A Y N O . 1 0 0 GLENWOOD AV E N U E LT LT PIVGM ELEC.BOX GASMETER GRAVELGRAVEL GRAVELGRAVE L GRAVEL 24'24'9'24'18.5'18.5'18.5'24'18.5' 30' SAW CUT LINE NEW CATCH BASIN NEW CATCH BASIN FLUME & 5 CY RIP RAP SAW CUT LINE 02G 04A FES & 10 CY RIP-RAP 04F SIGN 07A SIGN07H 04A 04B CURB & GUTTER01C CURB & GUTTER01C 03A CURB AND GUTTER01A 03A24'03A CURB & GUTTER01A HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE 02B 03A 03A CURB & GUTTER01A NEW 12" RCP @ 10' NEW 15" RCP @ 20' NEW 18" CMP @ 30' CONCRETESIDEWALK02A ADA RAMP ADA PARKINGSIGNS ONBUILDING CURB AND GUTTER01A 48.3'79.2'21.9'91.2'55.1'24'22.3'55.7'11'52'76'27.8' 55. 6 ' 5' NEW MANHOLE 18.5' 24' 18.5' 02C32'68.2'CURB & GUTTER01C MANHOLE04B CURB & GUTTER01A NEW FES WITH 10 CY RIPRAP04F CLEANOUT04J CLEANOUT04J 92'53'5' CURB & GUTTER01A MANHOLE04B CATCH BASIN04B MANHOLE04BMANHOLE04B 4" W x 6' LWHITE DASHED STRIPES 4" W x 6' LWHITE DASHED STRIPES 4" W SOLID YELLOWSTRIPE 13'13' 13' MANHOLE04B16'28'15' 07B 07G07H 04B 4" W x 6' L WHITE DASHED STRIPES SIGN07A07G07H 07G 04B MANHOLE07E REMOVE AND RESETEXISTING CB CASTINGS04B CONTINUE STRIPES TO BUILDING 12'12'Project Location Date Submittal / RevisionNo. Certification Sheet Title Summary Revision History Sheet No.Revision Project No. By Designed:Drawn: Approved:Book / Page: Phase:Initial Issue: ClientISD # 270 MEADOWBROOKELEMENTARYPARKING LOTIMPROVEMENTS GOLDENVALLEY, MN 5430 GLENWOOD AVE. NT JRW NT PRELIM.1/11/2021 21672.01 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SET OF PLANS ANDSPECIFICATIONS WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDERMY DIRECT SUPERVISION, AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. NEIL TESSIER, PE. DATE REGISTRATION NO. 2/22/2021 26364 SAFEngineering, PLLC Site and Athletic Facility Engineering 3200 122nd Ave. NEBlaine, MN 55449612-213-9859nrtessier@gmail.com LEGEND EASEMENT CURB & GUTTER BUILDING RETAINING WALL CHAINLINK FENCE NUMBER OF PARKING STALLS PER ROW SIGN PIPE BOLLARD STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVING HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT PAVING CONCRETE PAVING PROPERTY LIMIT EXISTINGPROPOSED KEY NOTE WETLAND LIMITS TREELINE XX XX 0 NORTH SCALE IN FEET 30 60 Feb 22, 2021 - 1:20pm - User:jworkman L:\PROJECTS\21672.01\CAD\Civil\Sheets\21672.01 - C3 - SITE.dwg C3.01 SITE PLAN -EAST PARKINGLOT DETAIL XX 04F FLARED END SECTION WITH RIP-RAP DETAIL KEYNOTES 02G FLUME 01A D312 CURB AND GUTTER 03A STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVING 07A SIGN POST 04B MANHOLE CATCH BASIN 02A CONCRETE SIDEWALK 02B HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE 02C ADA ACCESSIBLE RAMP 01C B612 CURB AND GUTTER 04J CLEAN OUT LIGHT POLE 04A CURB CATCH BASIN 07E ADA SYMBOL 07H DO NOT ENTER SIGN 07B ADA SIGNS 07G STOP SIGN 857.9 861860859858858858858 857 856 855854853852 8 6 4 86386 2 8 61 8 60 85985 9 858 857 856 857.3 858.3 858.2 858.2 858.1858.2 858.0 857.6 857.9 857.6 857.9 857.9 858.3 858.4 858.2858.8 859 859.9 86 0 860.7 857.0 856.5 859861862863864865866867868856.8 856.8860857.4 859860PROPOSED R/W V A C A T I O N PROPOSED R/W E A S E M E N T V A C A T I O N PR O P O S E D D R A I N A G E A N D U T I L I T Y E A S E M E N T A R E A CB 02 RE=857.00 IE=853.20 (E) SUMP=851.2 39 LF - 12" SCH 40 PVC @ 0.72% 18 LF - 15" RCP CONNECT TO EXISTING 853.50* *(FIELD VERIFY) 41 LF - 12" SCH40 PVC @ 0.5% CB 03 RE=855.50 IE=853.05 SW SUMP=851.05 5 LF - 15" SCH 40PVC @ 1.2% MH 09RE=868.00 IE=864.90 (SE) IE=862.00 (NW) 12 LF - 12"RCP @ 1.00% 40 LF - 18" CMP @ 3.8% MH 04RE=858.25 IE=853.13 (W) IE=852.92 (N) MH 03 RE=858.00 IE=853.13 NEIE=852.92 NWIE=852.92 W 10 LF - 15" SCH 40 PVC @ 1.0%FES 01 IE=852.00 FES 03IE=855.00 FIELD VERIFY CB 01 RE=856.80 IE=854.20 (SE) IE=854.15 (NW) SUMP=852.15 61 LF - 12"SCH40PVC @ 13.2% MH 05RE=857.70IE=853.75 MH 07RE=857.75IE=853.75 SEIE=853.75 EIE=853.75 N MH 06RE=857.80IE=853.75 MH 08RE=857.60IE=853.75 W IE=853.75 S IE=853.75 N MH 02 RE=856.00 IE=853.50 (W) IE=853.13 (SW) IE=852.92 (S)MH 01 RE=856.35 IE=853.13 (E) IE=852.92 (S) IE=852.40 (N) 17 LF - 15" SCH 40 PVC @ 1.2% PIPE01 - 15" OUTIE=852.20 PIPE04 - 15" INIE=852.34 PIPE03 - 12" OUT IE=853.87 PIPE02 - 15" INIE=852.98 12 LF - 15" SCH 40PVC @ 0.3% 9 LF - 12" PVC @ 3.78% PIPE07 - 12" INIE=853.80 PIPE06 - 15" OUTIE=853.70 PIPE05 - 15" IN IE=853.55 PIPE08 - 12" OUTIE=855.47 15' SCALE IN FEET 0 6030 NORTH Feb 22, 2021 - 1:21pm - User:jworkman L:\PROJECTS\21672.01\CAD\Civil\Sheets\21672.01 - C4 - GRAD.dwg C4.01 GRADING PLAN- EAST PARKINGLOT Project Location Date Submittal / RevisionNo. Certification Sheet Title Summary Revision History Sheet No.Revision Project No. By Designed:Drawn: Approved:Book / Page: Phase:Initial Issue: ClientISD # 270 MEADOWBROOKELEMENTARYPARKING LOTIMPROVEMENTS GOLDENVALLEY, MN 5430 GLENWOOD AVE. NT JRW NT PRELIM.1/11/2021 21672.01 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SET OF PLANS ANDSPECIFICATIONS WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDERMY DIRECT SUPERVISION, AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. NEIL TESSIER, PE. DATE REGISTRATION NO. 2/22/2021 26364 SAFEngineering, PLLC Site and Athletic Facility Engineering 3200 122nd Ave. NEBlaine, MN 55449612-213-9859nrtessier@gmail.com 902.5X 902 SPOT ELEVATION CONTOUR RIP RAP OVERFLOW ELEV. CURB & GUTTER BUILDING RETAINING WALL PROPERTY LIMIT EXISTINGPROPOSED LEGEND WETLAND LIMITS TREELINE STORM SEWER SOIL BORINGS DRAINTILE EOF 902.5 D LIGHT POLE NO PARKINGNO PARKING861860859858858858858 857 856 855854853852 8 6 4 863 86 2 86 1 8 60 85985 9 858 857 856 86 0 859861862863864865866867868860859860PROPOSED R/W V A C A T I O N PROPOSED R/W E A S E M E N T V A C A T I O N PR O P O S E D D R A I N A G E A N D U T I L I T Y E A S E M E N T A R E AWE T L A N D TR U N K H I G H W A Y N O . 1 0 0 GLENWOOD AV E N U E LT LT PIVGM ELEC.BOX GASMETER GRAVELGRAVEL GRAVELGRAVE L GRAVEL Project Location Date Submittal / RevisionNo. Certification Sheet Title Summary Revision History Sheet No.Revision Project No. By Designed:Drawn: Approved:Book / Page: Phase:Initial Issue: ClientISD # 270 MEADOWBROOKELEMENTARYPARKING LOTIMPROVEMENTS GOLDENVALLEY, MN 5430 GLENWOOD AVE. NT JRW NT PRELIM.1/11/2021 21672.01 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SET OF PLANS ANDSPECIFICATIONS WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDERMY DIRECT SUPERVISION, AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. NEIL TESSIER, PE. DATE REGISTRATION NO. 2/22/2021 26364 SAFEngineering, PLLC Site and Athletic Facility Engineering 3200 122nd Ave. NEBlaine, MN 55449612-213-9859nrtessier@gmail.com 0 NORTH SCALE IN FEET 30 60 Feb 22, 2021 - 1:21pm - User:jworkman L:\PROJECTS\21672.01\CAD\Civil\Sheets\21672.01 - C5 - EROS.dwg C5.01 EROSIONCONTROL PLAN- EASTPARKING LOT DIRECTION OF OVERLAND FLOW TEMPORARY DIVERSION DITCH LIMITS OF DRAINAGE SUB-BASIN INLET PROTECTION DEVICE TEMPORARY STONE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE OVERFLOW ELEV. CONTOUR RIP RAP CHECK DAM SILT FENCE SOIL BORINGS EXISTINGPROPOSED STORM SEWER CURB & GUTTER DRAINTILE THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN SHEETS ALONG WITH THE REST OF THE SWPPP MUST BE KEPT ONSITE UNTIL THE NOTICE OF TERMINATION IS FILED WITH THE MPCA, THE CONTRACTOR MUST UPDATE THE SWPPP, INCLUDING THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN SHEETS AS NECESSARY TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS, SUCH AS ADDITIONAL OR MODIFIED BMPS DESIGNED TO CORRECT PROBLEMS IDENTIFIED. AFTER FILING THE NOTICE OF TERMINATION, THE SWPPP, INCLUDING THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN SHEETS, AND ALL REVISIONS TO IT MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE OWNER, TO BE KEPT ON FILE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RECORD RETENTION REQUIREMENTS DESCRIBED IN THE SWPPP NARRATIVE. SILT DIKE BIO-ROLL LEGEND NOTE TO CONTRACTOR EOF 902.5 D 902 IPX LIGHT POLE Project Location Date Submittal / RevisionNo. Certification Sheet Title Summary Revision History Sheet No.Revision Project No. By Designed:Drawn: Approved:Book / Page: Phase:Initial Issue: ClientISD # 270 MEADOWBROOKELEMENTARYPARKING LOTIMPROVEMENTS GOLDENVALLEY, MN 5430 GLENWOOD AVE. NT JRW NT PRELIM.1/11/2021 21672.01 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SET OF PLANS ANDSPECIFICATIONS WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDERMY DIRECT SUPERVISION, AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. NEIL TESSIER, PE. DATE REGISTRATION NO. 2/22/2021 26364 SAFEngineering, PLLC Site and Athletic Facility Engineering 3200 122nd Ave. NEBlaine, MN 55449612-213-9859nrtessier@gmail.com Feb 22, 2021 - 1:21pm - User:jworkman L:\PROJECTS\21672.01\CAD\Civil\Sheets\21672.01 - C5 - EROS.dwg C5.02 SWPPPNARRATIVE SECTION 1: SITE EVALUATION, ASSESSMENT, AND PLANNING 1.1 PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION PROJECT/SITE NAME: MEADOWBROOK ELEMENTARY PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT STREET/LOCATION: 5430 GLENWOOD AVE. CITY: GOLDEN VALLEY STATE: MINNESOTA ZIP CODE: 55422 COUNTY: HENNEPIN NPDES PERMIT NUMBER: TBD 1.2 CONTACT INFORMATION/RESPONSIBLE PARTIES COMPANY/ORGANIZATION NAME: SAFENGINEERING, PLLC CONTACT NAME: NEIL TESSIER ADDRESS: 3200 122 AVE NE CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE: BLAINE, MN 55449 TELEPHONE NUMBER: 612-213-9859 GENERAL CONTRACTOR (TO BE COMPLETED BY GENERAL CONTRACTOR): COMPANY/ORGANIZATION NAME: CONTACT NAME: ADDRESS: CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE: TELEPHONE NUMBER: FAX/EMAIL: THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA GENERAL PERMIT AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE STORM WATER ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTION DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM/STATE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERMIT PROGRAM (GENERAL PERMIT). THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR MUST COMPLY WITH ANY LOCAL GOVERNING AGENCY (LGU) HAVING JURISDICTION CONCERNING EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REQUIRED TO BE A CO-APPLICANT WITH THE OWNER. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTENANCE OF THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES. THE “APPLICATION FOR GENERAL STORM-WATER PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY (MN R100001)” SHALL BE COMPLETED BY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND SUBMITTED ONLINE, ALONG WITH THE REQUIRED APPLICATION FEE, THROUGH THE MPCA'S WEBSITE. UNLESS NOTIFIED BY THE MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY (MPCA) TO THE CONTRARY, APPLICANTS WHO SUBMIT A COMPLETE APPLICATION FORM IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE GENERAL PERMIT ARE AUTHORIZED TO DISCHARGE STORM WATER FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SITE UNDER THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THIS PERMIT SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS THE ONLINE APPLICATION PROCESS IS COMPLETE(HTTPS://NETWEB.PCA.STATE.MN.US/PRIVATE/). (NOTE: ALL PROJECTS UNDER 50 ACRES MUST SUBMIT THE PERMIT APPLICATION USING THE ONLINE PROCESS. MAILED APPLICATIONS ARE ONLY ACCEPTED FOR PROJECTS THAT DISTURB 50 OR MORE ACRES, AND HAVE A DISCHARGE POINT WITHIN 1 MILE OF A PROTECTED WATER.) ADDITIONALLY, AUTHORIZATION WILL BE DELAYED UNDER THE FOLLOWING CIRCUMSTANCES: ·IF THE PROJECT DISTURBS 50 ACRES OR MORE AND HAS A DISCHARGE POINT WITHIN 1 MILE AND FLOWS TO AN IMPAIRED OR SPECIAL WATER WHOSE DISCHARGE MAY REACH AN IMPAIRED OR SPECIAL WATER LISTED IN SECTION 23 OF THE GENERAL PERMIT THE APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN AND A COMPLETED APPLICATION AT LEAST 30 CALENDAR DAYS PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. UNLESS NOTIFIED BY THE MPCA TO THE CONTRARY, COVERAGE BECOMES EFFECTIVE 30 CALENDAR DAYS AFTER THE POSTMARKED DATE OF THE COMPLETED APPLICATION. ·IF THE PROJECT INCLUDES ALTERNATIVE METHODS THE APPLICATION AND TWO ALTERNATIVE TREATMENT PLANS MUST BE SUBMITTED A MINIMUM OF 90 DAY BEFORE CONSTRUCTION STARTS. EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL SUBCONTRACTOR (RESPONSIBLE FOR IMPLEMENTING &UPDATING SWPPP - TO BE COMPLETED BY CONTRACTOR): COMPANY/ORGANIZATION NAME: CONTACT NAME: ADDRESS: CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE: TELEPHONE NUMBER: FAX/EMAIL: EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL INSPECTOR (SEE PART 6.1 OF THIS SWPPP FOR MOREINFORMATION ON INSPECTION RESPONSIBILITIES- TO BE COMPLETED BY CONTRACTOR): COMPANY/ORGANIZATION NAME: CONTACT NAME: ADDRESS: CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE: TELEPHONE NUMBER: FAX/EMAIL: GROUND DISTURBING SUBCONTRACTOR(S): COMPANY/ORGANIZATION NAME: CONTACT NAME: ADDRESS: CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE: TELEPHONE NUMBER: FAX/EMAIL: THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A CHAIN OF RESPONSIBILITY WITH ALL OPERATORS ON THE SITE TO ENSURE THAT THE SWPPP WILL BE IMPLEMENTED AND STAY IN EFFECT UNTIL THE CONSTRUCTION PROJECT IS COMPLETE AND THE NOT SUBMITTED. THIS SWPPP WAS PREPARED BY: COMPANY/ORGANIZATION NAME: SAMBATEK, INC. CONTACT NAME: PETE MOREAU ADDRESS: 12800 WHITEWATER DRIVE, SUITE 300 CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE: MINNETONKA, MN 55343 TELEPHONE NUMBER: 763-476-6010 SWPPP DESIGNER CERTIFICATION CARD: 1.3 NATURE OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY NATURE OF CONSTRUCTION: THIS SWPPP HAS BEEN PREPARED FOR MAJOR ACTIVITIES ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION OF MEADOWBROOK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENTS. ANTICIPATED APPROXIMATE TIMELINES: ESTIMATED PROJECT START DATE: 06/15/2020 ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE:08/15/2020 1.4 SOILS, SLOPES, VEGETATION, AND CURRENT DRAINAGE PATTERNS SOIL TYPE(S): SILTY SANDS, CLAYEY SANDS, AND SANDY CLAYS. SLOPES: SLOPES RANGE FROM 2% TO 10% DRAINAGE PATTERNS: THE SITE CURRENTLY DRAINS INTO A CREEK. THE NEW DRAINAGE WILL BE RETAINED ON SITE THEN DISCHARGED INTO THE CREEK. VEGETATION: THE SITE WILL BE SODDED OR LANDSCAPED. RAINFALL INFORMATION: RAINFALL INFORMATION - THE AVERAGE TOTAL ANNUAL PRECIPITATION IS ABOUT 28.32 INCHES. OF THIS ABOUT 17.31 INCHES, OR 61 PERCENT, USUALLY FALLS IN MAY THROUGH SEPTEMBER. THE AVERAGE ANNUAL SNOWFALL IS 57.3 INCHES. 1.5 CONSTRUCTION SITE ESTIMATES PROJECT AREA SUMMARY: TOTAL PROJECT AREA: 12.45 ACRES CONSTRUCTION SITE AREA TO BE DISTURBED: 1.58 ACRES IMPERVIOUS AREAS: IMPERVIOUS AREA BEFORE CONSTRUCTION (ACRES): 8.26 IMPERVIOUS AREA AFTER CONSTRUCTION (ACRES): 8.32 1.6 RECEIVING WATERS CONSTRUCTION PHASE STORM WATER SYSTEM DESCRIPTION: UNDERGROUND RETENTION SYSTEM. DESCRIPTION OF RECEIVING WATERS: SWEENY LAKE 1.7 SITE FEATURES AND SENSITIVE AREAS TO BE PROTECTED N/A 1.8 POTENTIAL SOURCES OF POLLUTION POTENTIAL SOURCES OF SEDIMENT AND OTHER POLLUTANTS TO STORMWATER RUNOFF: CONSTRUCTION PHASE POLLUTANT SOURCES ANTICIPATED AT THE SITE ARE DISTURBED (BARE) SOIL, VEHICLE FUELS AND LUBRICANTS, CHEMICALS ASSOCIATED WITH BUILDING CONSTRUCTION, AND BUILDING MATERIALS. WITHOUT ADEQUATE CONTROL THERE IS THE POTENTIAL FOR EACH TYPE OF POLLUTANT TO BE TRANSPORTED BY STORM WATER. 1.9 ENDANGERED/THREATENED SPECIES NO KNOWN THREATENED OR ENDANGERED SPECIES ARE PRESENT ON SITE. 1.10 HISTORIC PRESERVATION THERE ARE NO KNOWN HISTORIC SITES ON OR NEAR THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. 1.11 APPLICABLE FEDERAL, TRIBAL, STATE OR LOCAL PROGRAMS LOCAL GOVERNING UNIT (LGU) REQUIREMENTS: CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY AND BASSETT CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT. 1.12 MITIGATION MEASURES FROM ENVIRONMENTALREVIEWS/TMDLS/IMPAIRED WATERS 1.13 MAPS N/A EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANS: THE FOLLOWING SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN SHEETS ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THIS SWPPP: C-3.01 - PHASE I EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN/”SITE MAP” C-3.01 - PHASE II EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN/”SITE MAP” C-9.03 - EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL DETAILS SECTION 2: EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS EROSION CONTROL BMPS: THE PURPOSE OF EROSION CONTROL IS TO PREVENT SOIL PARTICLES FROM BECOMING SUSPENDED IN WATER AND BEING TRANSPORTED TO EITHER DOWNSTREAM SURFACE WATERS OR DOWNSTREAM PROPERTIES. APPROPRIATE CONSTRUCTION PHASING, VEGETATIVE BUFFER STRIPS, HORIZONTAL SLOPE GRADING, AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES THAT MINIMIZE EROSION MUST BE PLANNED FOR AND IMPLEMENTED. IN THE NATURAL CONDITION, SOIL IS STABILIZED BY NATIVE VEGETATION. THE PRIMARY TECHNIQUE TO BE USED AT THIS PROJECT FOR FINAL STABILIZATION OF SITE SOIL WILL BE TO PROVIDE A PROTECTIVE COVER OF VEGETATION, PAVEMENT, OR BUILDING. ALL EXPOSED AREAS MUST BE STABILIZED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE (BUT NO LATER THAN THE NEXT WORK DAY) TO LIMIT SOIL EROSION, BUT IN NO CASE LATER THAN 7 DAYS AFTER THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IN THAT PORTION OF THE SITE HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED. TEMPORARY SOIL STOCKPILES WITHOUT SIGNIFICANT SILT, CLAY OR ORGANIC COMPONENTS (E.G. CLEAN AGGREGATED STOCKPILES, DEMOLITION CONCRETE STOCKPILES, SAND STOCKPILES) AND THE CONSTRUCTED BASE COMPONENTS OF ROADS, PARKING LOTS AND SIMILAR SURFACES ARE EXEMPT FROM THIS REQUIREMENT, BUT MUST COMPLY WITH SECTION 2.7 OF THIS SWPPP (SECTION 8.4, 9.9, 9.10, AND 23.9 OF THE GENERAL PERMIT). SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS: THE PURPOSE OF SEDIMENT CONTROL IS TO PREVENT SOIL PARTICLES THAT HAVE BEEN SUSPENDED IN WATER FROM ENTERING SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEMS AND STORM SEWER INLETS. SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS HAVE BEEN DESIGNED AS PART OF THIS SWPPP. IF THE DOWN GRADIENT TREATMENT SYSTEM IS OVERLOADED, THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR IMPLEMENTING ADDITIONAL UP GRADIENT SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES OR REDUNDANT BMPS TO ELIMINATE THE OVERLOADING AND MUST AMEND THE SWPPP TO IDENTIFY THE ADDITIONAL PRACTICES. SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES MUST ALWAYS BE ESTABLISHED ON ALL DOWN GRADIENT PERIMETERS AND BE LOCATED UPGRADIENT OF ANY BUFFER ZONES. THE PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES MUST BE IN PLACE BEFORE ANY UP GRADIENT LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES BEGIN. THESE PRACTICES MUST REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL FINAL STABILIZATION IS ACHIEVED (SEE SECTION 8 OF THIS SWPPP). THE TIMING OF THE INSTALLATION OF SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES MAY BE ADJUSTED TO ACCOMMODATE SHORT-TERM ACTIVITIES SUCH AS CLEARING OR GRUBBING, OR PASSAGE OF VEHICLES. ANY SHORT TERM ACTIVITY MUST BE COMPLETED AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE AND THE SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES MUST BE RE-INSTALLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE ACTIVITY IS COMPLETED. SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES MUST BE INSTALLED BEFORE THE NEXT RAIN EVENT EVEN IF THE ACTIVITY IS NOT COMPLETE. 2.1 MINIMIZE DISTURBED AREA AND PROTECT NATURAL FEATURESAND SOIL 1.INSTALL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE. 2.INSTALL SILT FENCE / EROSION CONTROL. 3.DEMO ITEMS AS NEEDED. 4.ROUGH GRADE THE SITE. 5.CONSTRUCT STORM WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS. 6.CONSTRUCT BUILDING PAD AND STRUCTURES IF APPLICABLE. 7.TEMPORARY SEED AS REQUIRED. 8.INSTALL UTILITIES. 9.INSTALL BASE AGGREGATE, CURB AND GUTTER, CONCRETE, AND FIRST LIFT BITUMINOUS. 10.COMPLETE SITE GRADING, TOPSOIL PLACEMENT, SOD, SEED, TREES AND SHRUBS, AND ALL REQUIRED LANDSCAPING ELEMENTS. SOD AND SEE MUST BE INSTALLED WITHIN 7 DAYS OF FINAL GRADING. 11.REMOVE ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES ONCE SITE IS STABILIZED. 12.PAVE WEAR COURSE. 2.2 PRESERVE 50 FOOT NATURAL BUFFER N/A 2.3 CONTROL STORMWATER FLOWING ONTO AND THROUGH THEPROJECT MEASURES SHOULD BE TAKEN TO ENSURE THAT “CLEAN” RUNOFF FROM OFF SITE IS DIVERTED AROUND DISTURBED AREAS ON SITE. CARE SHOULD BE TAKEN THAT RE-ROUTING OFF SITE RUNOFF DOES NOT RESULT IN FLOODING OR OTHER ISSUES ON ADJACENT PROPERTIES. BMP DESCRIPTION: SILT FENCE, DANDY SACK. 2.4 STABILIZE SOILS 1.TEMPORARY SEEDING - DISTURBED AREAS THAT ARE NOT YET AT FINAL GRADE BUT THAT WILL NOT BE ACTIVELY WORKED FOR 7 DAYS OR MORE MUST BE TEMPORARILY STABILIZED. TEMPORARY STABILIZATION MUST BE INITIATED IMMEDIATELY WHERE WORK HAS TEMPORARILY CEASED AND MUST BE COMPLETED NO LATER THAN 7 CALENDAR DAYS AFTER WORK IN THAT PORTION OF THE SITE HAS TEMPORARILY CEASED. TEMPORARY SEEDING SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MN/DOT SEED MIXTURE NUMBER 21-111 OR 21-112 DEPENDING ON THE SEASON OF PLANTING (SEE MN/DOT SPECIFICATION SECTION 2575.3) SEEDING METHOD AND APPLICATION RATE SHALL CONFORM TO MN/DOT SPECIFICATION SECTION 2575.3. TEMPORARY MULCH SHALL BE APPLIED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MN/DOT SPECIFICATION SECTION 2575.3C. ALTERNATIVELY, HYDRAULIC SOIL STABILIZER IN ACCORDANCE WITH MN/DOT SPECIFICATION SECTION 2575.3E MAY BE USED IN PLACE OF TEMPORARY MULCH. 2.PERMANENT STABILIZATION - ALL AREAS AT FINAL GRADE MUST BE STABILIZED WITHIN 7 DAYS AFTER COMPLETION OF THE MAJOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. PERMANENT STABILIZATION MUST BE INITIATED IMMEDIATELY WERE WORK HAS PERMANENTLY CEASED AND MUST BE COMPLETED NO LATER THAN 7 CALENDAR DAYS AFTER CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IN THAT PORTION OF THE SITE HAS PERMANENTLY CEASED. SEEDED AREAS SHALL BE PROTECTED WITH MULCH. PERMANENT MULCH SHALL CONFORM TO MN/DOT SPECIFICATION 3882, TYPE 3 AT 2 TONS/ACRE AND SHALL BE DISK ANCHORED. HYDRAULIC SOIL STABILIZER MAY BE USED IN PLACE OF MULCH IF APPROVED BY CIVIL ENGINEER. IF HYDRAULIC SOIL STABILIZER IS USED, IT SHALL BE MN/DOT TYPE 6. 2.5 PROTECT SLOPES N/A 2.6 PROTECT STORM DRAIN INLETS ALL STORM DRAIN INLETS MUST BE PROTECTED BY APPROPRIATE MEANS DURING CONSTRUCTION UNTIL ALL SOURCES WITH POTENTIAL FOR DISCHARGING TO THE INLET HAVE BEEN STABILIZED. INLET PROTECTION MAY BE REMOVED FOR A PARTICULAR INLET IF A SPECIFIC SAFETY CONCERN (STREET FLOODING/FREEZING) HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED AND PERMITTEE(S) HAVE RECEIVED WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE FROM THE JURISDICTIONAL AUTHORITY (E.G. CITY/COUNTY/TOWNSHIP/MNDOT/ETC.) VERIFYING THE NEED FOR REMOVAL. THE WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE MUST BE DOCUMENTED IN THIS SWPPP. BMP DESCRIPTION: DANDY SACKS INSTALLATION SCHEDULE: INSTALL INLET PROTECTION IN EXISTING STRUCTURES AS DIRECTED ON THE SWPPP PLAN SHEETS, AND AS NEEDED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION, PRIOR TO BEGINNING GROUND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES UP GRADIENT OF THE INLET. INSTALL INLET PROTECTION ON NEW STRUCTURES AS SOON AS THE STRUCTURES ARE PUT INTO USE. MAINTENANCE AND INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS: INSPECT SILT FENCE EVERY 7 DAYS OR WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER A 0.5” 24-HOUR RAIN EVENT.  SEDIMENT ACCUMULATIONS SHOULD BE REMOVED WHEN SEDIMENT BUILD-UP REACHES 1/2 THE HEIGHT OF THE SILT FENCE. THIS MAINTENANCE MUST BE COMPLETED WITHIN 24 HOURS OF DISCOVERY. RESPONSIBLE STAFF (CONTRACTOR TO COMPLETE): 2.7 ESTABLISH PERIMETER CONTROLS AND SEDIMENT BARRIERS ALL STRUCTURAL SEDIMENT CONTROLS INTENDED TO RECEIVE AND TREAT CONSTRUCTION RUNOFF MUST BE IN PLACE BEFORE ANY UP GRADIENT LAND ALTERATION CAN BEGIN AND MUST STAY IN OPERATION UNTIL FINAL STABILIZATION OF THE SITE HAS BEEN ACHIEVED. TEMPORARY SOIL STOCKPILES MUST HAVE SILT FENCE OR OTHER EFFECTIVE SEDIMENT CONTROLS, AND CANNOT BE PLACED IN ANY NATURAL BUFFERS OR SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING STORMWATER CONVEYANCES SUCH AS CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEMS, OR CONDUITS AND DITCHES UNLESS THERE IS A BYPASS IN PLACE FOR THE STORMWATER. BMP DESCRIPTION: SILT FENCE INSTALLATION SCHEDULE: INSTALL SILT FENCE AS DIRECTED ON THE SWPPP PLAN SHEETS, AND AS NEEDED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION, PRIOR TO COMMENCING UP GRADIENT LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES. MAINTENANCE AND INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS: INSPECT SILT FENCE EVERY 7 DAYS OR WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER A 0.5” 24-HOUR RAIN EVENT.  SEDIMENT ACCUMULATIONS SHOULD BE REMOVED WHEN SEDIMENT BUILD-UP REACHES 1/2 THE HEIGHT OF THE SILT FENCE. THIS MAINTENANCE MUST BE COMPLETED WITHIN 24 HOURS OF DISCOVERY. RESPONSIBLE STAFF (CONTRACTOR TO COMPLETE): 2.8 RETAIN SEDIMENT ON-SITE ANY OFF-SITE ACCUMULATIONS OF SEDIMENT MUST BE REMOVED IN A MANNER AND AT A FREQUENCY SUFFICIENT TO MINIMIZE OFF-SITE IMPACT (E.G. FUGITIVE SEDIMENT IN STREETS COULD BE WASHED INTO STORM SEWERS BY THE NEXT RAIN AND/OR POSE A SAFETY HAZARD TO USERS OF PUBLIC STREETS. PERFORM DAILY STREET AND SITE SWEEPING. RESPONSIBLE STAFF (CONTRACTOR TO COMPLETE): 2.9 ESTABLISH VEHICLE TRACKING PADS N/A 2.10 CONTROL STORMWATER DISCHARGE POINTS 1.PIPE OR OTHER TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT OUTLETS MUST BE STABILIZED WITH TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT ENERGY DISSIPATION WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER CONNECTION TO A SURFACE WATER. 2.STABILIZE THE NORMAL WETTED PERIMETER OF A DRAINAGE DITCH OR SWALE WITHIN 200 FEET OF THE PROPERTY EDGE WITHIN 24 HOURS OF CONNECTION TO A SURFACE WATER. THE REMAINDER OF THE DITCH MUST BE STABILIZED WITHIN 7 CALENDAR DAYS. BMP DESCRIPTION: RIPRAP AND UNDERGROUND SYSTEM INSTALLATION SCHEDULE: INSTALL RIPRAP AS SHOWN ON SWPPP PLANS AND/OR GRADING PLANS. INSTALLATION MUST BE COMPLETED WITHIN 24 HOURS OF CONNECTING TO A SURFACE WATER. MAINTENANCE AND INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS: INSPECT OUTLETS EVERY 7 DAYS OR WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER A 0.5” 24-HOUR RAIN EVENT.  REPAIR, REPLACE OR SUPPLEMENT NON-FUNCTIONING RIPRAP ENERGY DISSIPATION WITHIN 3 DAYS OR BY THE NEXT RAIN EVENT, WHICHEVER COMES FIRST. ANY OFF SITE ACCUMULATION OF SEDIMENT MUST BE REMOVED IN MANNER AND AT A FREQUENCY TO MINIMIZE OFF-SITE IMPACTS. RESPONSIBLE STAFF (CONTRACTOR TO COMPLETE): 2.11 CHEMICAL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS N/A 2.13 ADDITIONAL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS N/A Project Location Date Submittal / RevisionNo. Certification Sheet Title Summary Revision History Sheet No.Revision Project No. By Designed:Drawn: Approved:Book / Page: Phase:Initial Issue: ClientISD # 270 MEADOWBROOKELEMENTARYPARKING LOTIMPROVEMENTS GOLDENVALLEY, MN 5430 GLENWOOD AVE. NT JRW NT PRELIM.1/11/2021 21672.01 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SET OF PLANS ANDSPECIFICATIONS WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDERMY DIRECT SUPERVISION, AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. NEIL TESSIER, PE. DATE REGISTRATION NO. 2/22/2021 26364 SAFEngineering, PLLC Site and Athletic Facility Engineering 3200 122nd Ave. NEBlaine, MN 55449612-213-9859nrtessier@gmail.com Feb 22, 2021 - 1:21pm - User:jworkman L:\PROJECTS\21672.01\CAD\Civil\Sheets\21672.01 - C5 - EROS.dwg C5.03 SWPPPNARRATIVE SECTION 3: DEWATERING & BASIN DRAINING 3.1 DEWATERING AND BASIN DRAINING ALLOWABLE NON-STORMWATER DISCHARGES, AS DEFINED BY THE GENERAL PERMIT, ARE LIMITED TO DEWATERING AND BASIN DRAINING. DEWATERING OR BASIN DRAINING THAT MAY HAVE TURBID OR SEDIMENT LADEN DISCHARGE WATER MUST BE DISCHARGED TO A TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT SEDIMENTATION BASIN ON THE PROJECT SITE WHENEVER POSSIBLE. IF THE WATER CANNOT BE DISCHARGED TO A SEDIMENTATION BASIN PRIOR TO ENTERING THE SURFACE WATER, IT MUST BE TREATED WITH THE APPROPRIATE BMPS, SUCH THAT THE DISCHARGE DOES NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT THE RECEIVING WATER OR DOWNSTREAM LANDOWNERS. THE CONTRACTOR MUST ENSURE THAT DISCHARGE POINTS ARE ADEQUATELY PROTECTED FROM EROSION AND SCOUR. THE DISCHARGE MUST BE DISPERSED OVER NATURAL ROCK RIPRAP, SAND BAGS, PLASTIC SHEETING OR OTHER ACCEPTED ENERGY DISSIPATION MEASURES. ADEQUATE SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES ARE REQUIRED FOR DISCHARGE WATER THAT CONTAINS SUSPENDED SOLIDS. ALL WATER FROM DEWATERING OR BASIN DRAINING MUST BE DISCHARGED IN A MANNER THAT DOES NOT CAUSE NUISANCE CONDITIONS, EROSION IN RECEIVING CHANNELS OR ON DOWNSLOPE PROPERTIES, OR INUNDATION IN WETLANDS CAUSING SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT TO THE WETLAND. IF THE CONTRACTOR ELECTS TO UTILIZE FILTERS WITH BACKWASH WATER, THE CONTRACTOR MUST HAUL THE BACKWASH WATER AWAY FOR DISPOSAL, RETURN THE BACKWATER TO THE BEGINNING OF THE TREATMENT PROCESS, OR INCORPORATE THE BACKWASH WATER INTO THE SITE IN A MANNER THAT DOES NOT CAUSE EROSION. THE CONTRACTOR MUST REPLACE AND CLEAN THE FILTER MEDIA USED IN DEWATERING DEVICES WHEN REQUIRED TO RETAIN ADEQUATE FUNCTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A WATER USE (APPROPRIATION) PERMIT FROM THE MINNESOTA DNR FOR DEWATERING ACTIVITIES THAT WILL WITHDRAW MORE THAN 10,000 GALLONS OF WATER PER DAY OR 1 MILLION GALLONS PER YEAR. (PROJECT SPECIFIC DEWATERING PROCESS MUST BE DEFINED) SECTION 4: GOOD HOUSEKEEPING BMPS 4.1 MATERIAL HANDLING AND WASTE MANAGEMENT 1.SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL - NO SOLID MATERIALS, INCLUDING CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION MATERIALS, COLLECTED SEDIMENT, ASPHALT AND CONCRETE MILLINGS, SHALL BE ALLOWED TO BE CARRIED FROM THE SITE WITH STORM WATER. ALL SOLID WASTE, INCLUDING DISPOSABLE MATERIALS INCIDENTAL TO THE MAJOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES, MUST BE COLLECTED AND PLACED IN CONTAINERS. THE CONTAINERS WILL BE EMPTIED PERIODICALLY BY A CONTRACT TRASH DISPOSAL SERVICE AND HAULED AWAY FROM THE SITE. DISPOSAL OF SOLID WASTES MUST COMPLY WITH MPCA REQUIREMENTS. 2.GROUNDWATER PROTECTION - SUBSTANCES THAT HAVE THE POTENTIAL FOR POLLUTING SURFACE AND/OR GROUNDWATER MUST BE CONTROLLED BY WHATEVER MEANS NECESSARY IN ORDER TO ENSURE THAT THEY DO NOT DISCHARGE FROM THE SITE. AS AN EXAMPLE, SPECIAL CARE MUST BE EXERCISED DURING EQUIPMENT FUELING AND SERVICING OPERATIONS. IF A SPILL OCCURS, IT MUST BE CONTAINED AND DISPOSED OF SO THAT IT WILL NOT FLOW FROM THE SITE OR ENTER GROUNDWATER, EVEN IF THIS REQUIRES REMOVAL, TREATMENT, AND DISPOSAL OF SOIL. IN THIS REGARD, POTENTIALLY POLLUTING SUBSTANCES SHOULD BE HANDLED IN A MANNER CONSISTENT WITH THE IMPACT THEY REPRESENT. 3.SANITARY FACILITIES - ALL PERSONNEL INVOLVED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES MUST COMPLY WITH STATE AND LOCAL SANITARY SEPTIC SYSTEM REGULATIONS. PORTABLE TOILETS MUST BE POSITIONED SO THAT THEY ARE SECURE AND WILL NOT BE TIPPED OR KNOCKED OVER. TEMPORARY SANITARY FACILITIES WILL BE PROVIDED AT THE SITE THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE WHERE REQUIRED BY STATE OR LOCAL REGULATIONS. THEY MUST BE UTILIZED BY ALL CONSTRUCTION PERSONNEL AND BE SERVICED BY A COMMERCIAL OPERATOR. 4.2 ESTABLISH PROPER STORAGE, HANDLING & DISPOSAL PRACTICES HAZARDOUS MATERIALS & TOXIC WASTE (INCLUDING OIL, DIESEL FUEL, GASOLINE, HYDRAULIC FLUIDS, PAINT SOLVENTS, PETROLEUM-BASED PRODUCTS, WOOD PRESERVATIVES, ADDITIVES, CURING COMPOUNDS, AND ACIDS) MUST BE STORED IN WATERPROOF CONTAINERS WITH SECONDARY CONTAINMENT, AND THEIR LOCATION(S) MUST BE NOTED ON THE SWPPP MAP. EXCEPT DURING APPLICATION, THE CONTENTS MUST BE KEPT IN TRUCKS OR WITHIN STORAGE FACILITIES IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 12.4 OF THE GENERAL PERMIT. STORAGE AND DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS WASTE MUST BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH MCPA REGULATIONS. RUNOFF CONTAINING SUCH MATERIAL MUST BE COLLECTED, REMOVED FROM THE SITE, TREATED, AND DISPOSED AT AN APPROVED SOLID WASTE OR CHEMICAL DISPOSAL FACILITY. BUILDING PRODUCTS THAT HAVE THE POTENTIAL TO LEACH POLLUTANTS AND PESTICIDES, HERBICIDES, INSECTICIDES, FERTILIZERS, TREATMENT CHEMICALS AND LANDSCAPE MATERIALS MUST BE UNDER COVER BY PLASTIC SHEETING OR TEMPORARY ROOFS TO PREVENT DISCHARGE, OR PROTECTED BY SIMILAR EFFECTIVE MEANS TO PREVENT CONTACT WITH STORMWATER. 4.3 DESIGNATE WASHOUT AREAS N/A 4.4 ESTABLISH PROPER EQUIPMENT/VEHICLE FUELING AND MAINTENANCE PRACTICES THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DESIGNATE AREAS FOR EQUIPMENT FUELING, CLEANING, MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR, AND NOTE THE LOCATION(S) ON THE SWPPP SITE MAPS. RUNOFF MUST BE CONTAINED WITHIN THE DESIGNATED AREAS (I.E. THROUGH USE OF A TEMPORARY BERM). THE AREAS MUST NOT BE LOCATED IN ANY SURFACE WATER. SPECIAL CARE MUST BE EXERCISED DURING EQUIPMENT FUELING AND SERVICING OPERATIONS. IF A SPILL OCCURS, IT MUST BE CONTAINED AND DISPOSED OF SO THAT IT WILL NOT FLOW FROM THE SITE OR ENTER GROUNDWATER, EVEN IF THIS REQUIRES REMOVAL, TREATMENT, AND DISPOSAL OF SOIL. IT IS THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO ENSURE THAT ADEQUATE SUPPLIES ARE AVAILABLE AT ALL TIMES TO CLEAN UP DISCHARGED MATERIALS AND THAT AN APPROPRIATE DISPOSAL METHOD IS AVAILABLE FOR RECOVERED SPILLED MATERIALS. NO ENGINE DEGREASING IS ALLOWED ON SITE. 4.5 CONTROL EQUIPMENT/VEHICLE WASHING THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DESIGNATE LOCATION(S) FOR VEHICLE WASHING, AND NOTE THE LOCATION(S) ON THE SWPPP SITE MAP. RUNOFF FROM THE WASHING AREA MUST BE CONTAINED IN A SEDIMENT BASIN OR OTHER SIMILARLY EFFECTIVE CONTROLS AND WASTE FROM THE WASHING ACTIVITY MUST BE PROPERLY DISPOSED OF. THE CONTRACTOR MUST PROPERLY USE AND STORE SOAPS, DETERGENTS AND SOLVENTS. ENGINE DEGREASING OF TRUCKS AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES IS ALSO PROHIBITED. 4.6 SPILL PREVENTION AND CONTROL PLAN 1.ACCIDENTAL SPILL - DISCHARGE OF OIL OR OTHER HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES IS SUBJECT TO REPORTING AND CLEAN UP REQUIREMENTS. IN CASE OF AN ACCIDENTAL SPILL, THE MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY IS TO BE NOTIFIED AT THEIR 24-HOURTELEPHONE NUMBER: 651-649-5451. REFER TO SECTION 12 OF THE GENERAL PERMIT. 2.GROUNDWATER PROTECTION - SUBSTANCES THAT HAVE THE POTENTIAL FOR POLLUTING SURFACE AND/OR GROUNDWATER MUST BE CONTROLLED BY WHATEVER MEANS NECESSARY IN ORDER TO ENSURE THAT THEY DO NOT DISCHARGE FROM THE SITE. AS AN EXAMPLE, SPECIAL CARE MUST BE EXERCISED DURING EQUIPMENT FUELING AND SERVICING OPERATIONS. IF A SPILL OCCURS, IT MUST BE CONTAINED AND DISPOSED OF SO THAT IT WILL NOT FLOW FROM THE SITE OR ENTER GROUNDWATER, EVEN IF THIS REQUIRES REMOVAL, TREATMENT, AND DISPOSAL OF SOIL. IN THIS REGARD, POTENTIALLY POLLUTING SUBSTANCES SHOULD BE HANDLED IN A MANNER CONSISTENT WITH THE IMPACT THEY REPRESENT. 4.7 ADDITIONAL BMPS N/A SECTION 5: POST-CONSTRUCTION BMPS [DESCRIBE PERMANENT STORM WATER SYSTEM, AND INCLUDE REFERENCE TO DESIGN CALCULATIONS. REFER TO SECTION 15, 16, 17, 18, AND 19 OF THE GENERAL PERMIT, AS WELL AS LGU REQUIREMENTS. NOTE: THE 2018 GENERAL PERMIT REQUIRES INFILTRATION OF THE WATER QUALITY VOLUME (1” OVER THE NEW IMPERVIOUS)] BMP DESCRIPTION: UNDERGROUND RETENTION SYSTEM INSTALLATION SCHEDULE: DURING GRADING ACTIVITIES MAINTENANCE AND INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS: PRACTICE SHOULD BE INSPECTED SEMI-ANNUALLY TO ENSURE THE DRAWDOWN TIME OF 48-HOURS IS MAINTAINED. REFER TO MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS FOR INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE. RESPONSIBLE STAFF (CONTRACTOR TO COMPLETE): BMP DESCRIPTION: SUMP MANHOLE INSTALLATION SCHEDULE: ALONG WITH STORM SEWER NETWORK MAINTENANCE AND INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS: PRACTICE SHOULD BE INSPECTED (AND CLEANED OUT IF DEEMED NECESSARY) SEMI-ANNUALLY TO ENSURE THAT SEDIMENT IS NOT BEGINNING TO WASH OUT DURING STORM EVENTS. DEVICES SHOULD BE CLEANED OUT AT LEAST ONCE PER YEAR OR AS NEEDED. RESPONSIBLE STAFF (CONTRACTOR TO COMPLETE): SECTION 6: INSPECTIONS 6.1 INSPECTIONS 1.INSPECTION FREQUENCY AND RESPONSIBILITY BETWEEN THE TIME THIS SWPPP IS IMPLEMENTED AND FINAL SITE STABILIZATION IS ACHIEVED AND THE NOTICE OF TERMINATION FILED WITH THE MPCA, ALL DISTURBED AREAS AND POLLUTANT CONTROLS MUST BE INSPECTED AT LEAST ONCE EVERY SEVEN CALENDAR DAYS AND WITHIN 24 HOURS FOLLOWING A RAINFALL OF 0.5 INCHES OR GREATER. THE PURPOSE OF SITE INSPECTIONS IS TO ASSESS PERFORMANCE OF POLLUTANT CONTROLS. THE INSPECTIONS WILL BE CONDUCTED BY THE CONTRACTOR'S DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE. BASED ON THESE INSPECTIONS, THE CONTRACTOR WILL DECIDE WHETHER IT IS NECESSARY TO MODIFY THIS SWPPP, ADD OR RELOCATE STRUCTURAL BMPS, OR WHATEVER ELSE MAY BE NEEDED IN ORDER TO PREVENT POLLUTANTS FROM LEAVING THE SITE VIA STORM WATER RUNOFF. IF THE SWPPP REQUIRES MODIFICATION, THOSE CHANGES TO THE SWPPP MUST BE DOCUMENTED. THE CONTRACTOR HAS THE DUTY TO CAUSE POLLUTANT CONTROL MEASURES TO BE REPAIRED, MODIFIED, MAINTAINED, SUPPLEMENTED, OR WHATEVER ELSE IS NECESSARY IN ORDER TO ACHIEVE EFFECTIVE POLLUTANT CONTROL. 2. INSPECTION PROCEDURES - EXAMPLES OF PARTICULAR ITEMS TO EVALUATE DURING SITE INSPECTIONS ARE LISTED BELOW. THIS LIST IS NOT INTENDED TO BE COMPREHENSIVE. DURING EACH INSPECTION THE INSPECTOR MUST EVALUATE OVERALL POLLUTANT CONTROL SYSTEM PERFORMANCE AS WELL AS PARTICULAR DETAILS OF INDIVIDUAL SYSTEM COMPONENTS. ADDITIONAL FACTORS SHOULD BE CONSIDERED AS APPROPRIATE TO THE CIRCUMSTANCES. A. PRE-INSPECTION PREPARATION: 1. INSPECTORS SHOULD BE FAMILIAR WITH THE SWPPP, INCLUDING THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANS, PAST INSPECTION REPORTS, AND MAINTENANCE LOGS. B. SITE ENTRY: 1. BEFORE ENTERING THE SITE, OBSERVE THE SURROUNDINGS AND VARIOUS STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION. NOTE AREAS FOR IN-DEPTH REVIEW AND ANY POTENTIAL ISSUES. 2. THIS IS A GOOD TIME TO VIEW CONSTRUCTION SITE VEHICLE TRACKING PAD LOCATIONS AND PERIMETER CONTROLS. C. RECORDS REVIEW: 1. VERIFY THAT A COPY OF THE SWPPP AND APPLICATION FOR THE NPDES STORM WATER PERMIT, AND COPIES OF ALL CONSTRUCTION SITE INSPECTIONS ARE ON SITE. 2. VERIFY THAT THE TIMING FOR INSTALLATION OF ALL EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS, AS WELL AS CONSTRUCTION PHASING, IS GENERALLY BEING FOLLOWED. 3. SWPPPS ARE INTENDED TO BE DYNAMIC DOCUMENTS, VERIFY THAT AMENDMENTS OR CHANGES TO THE SWPPP ARE BEING MADE WHEN: A.A CHANGE IN DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION, MAINTENANCE, WEATHER OR SEASONAL CONDITIONS HAVE A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON STORM WATER DISCHARGES B. INSPECTIONS INDICATE THE SWPPP IS NOT EFFECTIVE C. THE SWPPP IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE TERMS OF THE GENERAL PERMIT D. SITE INSPECTION (NOTE TIMELINES FOR MAINTENANCE INCLUDED IN INSPECTION/MAINTENANCE REPORT) 1. INSPECT DISCHARGE POINTS DOWNSTREAM AND OFF-SITE AREAS FOR SIGNS OF IMPACT. 2. INSPECT PERIMETER CONTROLS: A. HAVE PERIMETER CONTROLS BEEN PROPERLY INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED? B. ARE VEHICLE TRACKING PADS FUNCTIONING PROPERLY? ARE ADDITIONAL ENTRANCES/EXITS BEING USED THAT ARE NOT STABILIZED? C. ALL STORM DRAINS MUST BE PROTECTED AND TEMPORARY STOCKPILES MUST HAVE SEDIMENT CONTROLS INSTALLED. D. ALL EXPOSED SOILS MUST HAVE TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT EROSION PROTECTION WITHIN 7 DAYS OF INACTIVITY. 3. COMPARE BMPS IN THE SWPPP WITH CONSTRUCTION SITE CONDITIONS: ARE REQUIRED BMPS IN PLACE; ARE ADDITIONAL BMPS NEEDED; ARE BMPS IN PLACE PROPERLY INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED? 4. INSPECT AREAS THAT HAVE BEEN DISTURBED AND ARE NOT CURRENTLY BEING WORKED. ANY UNSEEDED OR UNMULCHED BARE AREAS THAT HAVE BEEN IDLE FOR 7 DAYS SHOULD BE NOTED. 5. INSPECT AREAS WITH FINAL STABILIZATION. IN ORDER FOR FINAL STABILIZATION TO BE ACHIEVED, AREAS MUST HAVE A UNIFORM COVER WITH A DENSITY OF 70% OVER ENTIRE AREA. TEMPORARY BMPS SHOULD BE REMOVED AND AREAS DISTURBED BY REMOVAL SEEDED AS NECESSARY. E. EXIT INTERVIEW: 1. DEBRIEF THE PERSON IN CHARGE. EXPLAIN THE IDENTIFIED DEFICIENCIES AND ANY AREAS OF CONCERN. F. A COPY OF THE COMPLETED INSPECTION REPORT MUST BE KEPT WITH THE SWPPP ON SITE. THE INSPECTION REPORT USED SHOULD INCLUDE, AT A MINIMUM, THE FOLLOWING: ·DATE & TIME OF INSPECTION ·NAME OF INSPECTOR(S) ·FINDINGS OF INSPECTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CORRECTIVE ACTIONS ·CORRECTIVE ACTIONS TAKEN, INCLUDING DATES, TIMES AND NAMES OF PARTY COMPLETING MAINTENANCE ·DATE & AMOUNT OF RAINFALL ·RECORD OF ALL POINTS OF DISCHARGE FROM THE PROPERTY AND DESCRIPTION OF DISCHARGE ·NOTE TO UPDATE THE SWPPP 6.2 DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY N/A 6.3 CORRECTIVE ACTION LOG THE INSPECTION/MAINTENANCE FORM, AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST, INCORPORATES BOTH INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE REPORTING INTO A SINGLE FORM. THIS FORM ALSO SPECIFIES THE TIME ALLOWED FOR CORRECTIONS TO BE PERFORMED. IF THE PARTY PERFORMING INSPECTIONS CHOOSES TO USE ANOTHER INSPECTION FORM, A SEPARATE CORRECTIVE ACTION LOG MUST BE PROVIDED. SECTION 7: RECORD KEEPING AND TRAINING 7.1 RECORDKEEPING RECORD RETENTION - THE OWNER MUST KEEP THE SWPPP INCLUDING ALL CHANGES MADE TO IT DURING CONSTRUCTION (SEE SECTION 7.2 OF THIS SWPPP), ALONG WITH THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL RECORDS ON FILE FOR THREE YEARS AFTER COMPLETION OF THE CONSTRUCTION PROJECT (FINAL STABILIZATION AND NOTICE OF TERMINATION): 1.ANY OTHER STORMWATER RELATED PERMITS REQUIRED FOR THE PROJECT 2.RECORDS OF ALL INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE CONDUCTED DURING CONSTRUCTION 3.ALL PERMANENT OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS THAT HAVE BEEN IMPLEMENTED, INCLUDING ALL RIGHT OF WAY, CONTRACTS, COVENANTS AND OTHER BINDING REQUIREMENTS REGARDING PERPETUAL MAINTENANCE 4.ALL REQUIRED CALCULATIONS FOR DESIGN OF THE TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT STORM WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS 7.2 AMENDMENTS THE CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP A RECORD LOG OF ALL MODIFICATIONS TO THE SWPPP. AN EXAMPLE OF A SWPPP UPDATE LOG FORM CAN BE PROVIDED UPON REQUEST. MODIFICATIONS TO THE SWPPP - THIS SWPPP INTENDS TO CONTROL WATER-BORNE AND LIQUID POLLUTANT DISCHARGES BY SOME COMBINATION OF INTERCEPTION, FILTRATION, AND CONTAINMENT. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND SUBCONTRACTORS IMPLEMENTING THIS SWPPP MUST REMAIN ALERT TO THE NEED TO PERIODICALLY REFINE AND UPDATE THE SWPPP IN ORDER TO ACCOMPLISH THE INTENDED GOALS. THIS SWPPP MUST BE AMENDED AS NECESSARY DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION IN ORDER TO KEEP IT CURRENT WITH THE POLLUTANT CONTROL MEASURES UTILIZED AT THE SITE. AMENDING THE SWPPP DOES NOT MEAN THAT IT HAS TO BE REPRINTED. IT IS ACCEPTABLE TO ADD ADDENDA, SKETCHES, NEW SECTIONS, AND/OR REVISED DRAWINGS. THIS SWPPP MUST BE UPDATED AS NECESSARY TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS, SUCH AS ADDITIONAL OR MODIFIED BMPS, DESIGNED TO CORRECT PROBLEMS IDENTIFIED OR ADDRESS SITUATIONS WHENEVER: 1.THERE IS A CHANGE IN DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION, MAINTENANCE, WEATHER OR SEASONAL CONDITIONS THAT HAS A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE DISCHARGE OF POLLUTANTS TO SURFACE WATERS OR UNDERGROUND WATERS. 2.INSPECTIONS OR INVESTIGATIONS BY SITE OPERATORS, LOCAL, STATE OR FEDERAL OFFICIALS INDICATE THE SWPPP IS NOT EFFECTIVE IN ELIMINATING OR SIGNIFICANTLY MINIMIZING THE DISCHARGE OF POLLUTANTS TO SURFACE WATERS OR UNDERGROUND WATERS OR THAT THE DISCHARGES ARE CAUSING WATER QUALITY STANDARD EXCEEDANCES. 3.THE SWPPP IS NOT ACHIEVING THE GENERAL OBJECTIVES OF CONTROLLING POLLUTANTS IN STORM WATER DISCHARGES ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY, OR THE SWPPP IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE GENERAL PERMIT. 4.THE MPCA HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROJECT'S STORM WATER DISCHARGES MAY CAUSE OR CONTRIBUTE TO NON-ATTAINMENT OF ANY APPLICABLE WATER STANDARD, OR THAT THE SWPPP DOES NOT INCORPORATE REQUIREMENTS RELATED TO AN APPROVED TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOAD (TMDL) IMPLEMENTATION PLAN. IN THIS CASE, THE SWPPP MUST BE UPDATED OR A SUPPLEMENTAL BMP ACTION PLAN DEVELOPED TO ADDRESS THE IDENTIFIED CONCERNS. 7.3 TRAINING THE PERMITTEE(S) MUST FULFILL TRAINING REQUIREMENTS AND INCLUDE RECORDS OF TRAINING IN THE SWPPP. REFRESHER TRAINING MUST BE ATTENDED EVERY THREE YEARS STARTING THREE YEARS, FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THE GENERAL PERMIT. INDIVIDUALS REQUIRED TO BE TRAINED INCLUDE: 1.INDIVIDUALS PREPARING THE SWPPP 2.INDIVIDUALS OVERSEEING IMPLEMENTATION OF, REVISING, AND AMENDING THE SWPPP AND INDIVIDUALS PERFORMING INSPECTIONS. ONE OF THESE INDIVIDUALS MUST BE AVAILABLE FOR AN ON SITE INSPECTION WITHIN 72 HOURS UPON REQUEST BY THE MPCA. 3.INDIVIDUALS PERFORMING OR SUPERVISING THE INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR OF BMPS. AT LEAST ONE INDIVIDUAL ON A PROJECT MUST BE TRAINED IN THESE JOB DUTIES. THE CONTENT AND EXTENT OF TRAINING MUST BE COMMENSURATE WITH THE INDIVIDUAL'S JOB DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES WITH REGARD TO ACTIVITIES COVERED UNDER THE GENERAL PERMIT. AT LEAST ONE INDIVIDUAL TRAINED IN THE JOB DUTIES LISTED ABOVE MUST BE PRESENT ON THE SITE OR AVAILABLE TO THE SITE IN 72 HOURS. TRAINING DOCUMENTATION MUST INCLUDE: 1.NAMES OF PERSONNEL ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROJECT THAT ARE REQUIRED TO BE TRAINED 2.DATES OF TRAINING AND NAMES OF INSTRUCTOR AND ENTITY PROVIDING TRAINING 3.CONTENT OF TRAINING COURSE, INCLUDING NUMBER OF HOURS OF TRAINING 4.DOCUMENTATION MUST BE KEPT WITH THE SWPPP. TRAINING RECORD/CERTIFICATION TEMPLATE IS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST. INDIVIDUALS MUST BE TRAINED BY LOCAL, STATE, FEDERAL AGENCIES, PROFESSIONAL ORGANIZATIONS, OR OTHER ENTITIES WITH EXPERTISE IN EROSION PREVENTION, SEDIMENT CONTROL, OR PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SUCH AS THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA, MINNESOTA EROSION CONTROL ASSOCIATION, SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICTS, OR THE MPCA. SECTION 8: FINAL STABILIZATION / PERMIT TERMINATION FINAL STABILIZATION - TO ACHIEVE FINAL STABILIZATION OF THE SITE, THE CONTRACTOR WILL IMPLEMENT THE FOLLOWING MEASURES AFTER ALL SOIL DISTURBING ACTIVITIES AT THE SITE HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. 1.ALL SOILS MUST BE STABILIZED BY A UNIFORM PERENNIAL VEGETATIVE COVER WITH A DENSITY OF 70 PERCENT OVER THE ENTIRE PERVIOUS SURFACE AREA, OR BY OTHER EQUIVALENT MEANS NECESSARY TO PREVENT SOIL FAILURE UNDER EROSIVE CONDITIONS. REFER TO LANDSCAPING PLANS/SPECIFICATIONS FOR TYPE OF VEGETATIVE COVER. 2.THE PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM IS CONSTRUCTED, MEETS ALL REQUIREMENTS IN SECTIONS 15, 16, 17, 18, AND 19 OF THE GENERAL PERMIT AND IS OPERATING AS DESIGNED. TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT SEDIMENTATION BASINS THAT ARE TO BE USED AS PERMANENT WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT BASINS HAVE BEEN CLEAN OF ANY ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT. ALL SEDIMENT HAS BEEN REMOVED FROM CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS AND DITCHES ARE STABILIZED WITH PERMANENT COVER. [MODIFY THIS ITEM TO BE SITE SPECIFIC - DELETE REFERENCES TO PERMANENT OR TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION BASINS IF NONE ARE DESIGNED] 3.ALL TEMPORARY EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS MUST BE REMOVED. PERMIT TERMINATION - TO ACHIEVE PERMIT TERMINATION FOR THE SITE, PERMITTEES MUST COMPLY WITH SECTIONS 4 & 13 OF THE GENERAL PERMIT. NO PARKINGNO PARKING861860859858858858858 857 856 855854853852 8 6 4 863 86 2 86 1 8 60 85985 9 858 857 856 86 0 859861862863864865866867868860859860PROPOSED R/W V A C A T I O N PROPOSED R/W E A S E M E N T V A C A T I O N PR O P O S E D D R A I N A G E A N D U T I L I T Y E A S E M E N T A R E AWE T L A N D TR U N K H I G H W A Y N O . 1 0 0 GLENWOOD AV E N U E LT LT PIVGM ELEC.BOX GASMETER GRAVELGRAVEL GRAVELGRAVE L GRAVEL 5PSE 5HHR 3HAB 6CD 5PSE 5SJL 3WSL 3WSL 1AB 1AB AB1 WS3 LANDSCAPE EDGING 4IL 4IL 2IL Project Location Date Submittal / RevisionNo. Certification Sheet Title Summary Revision History Sheet No.Revision Project No. By Designed:Drawn: Approved:Book / Page: Phase:Initial Issue: ClientISD # 270 MEADOWBROOKELEMENTARYPARKING LOTIMPROVEMENTS GOLDENVALLEY, MN 5430 GLENWOOD AVE. NT JRW NT PRELIM.1/11/2021 21672.01 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SET OF PLANS ANDSPECIFICATIONS WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDERMY DIRECT SUPERVISION, AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. NEIL TESSIER, PE. DATE REGISTRATION NO. 2/22/2021 26364 SAFEngineering, PLLC Site and Athletic Facility Engineering 3200 122nd Ave. NEBlaine, MN 55449612-213-9859nrtessier@gmail.com LEGEND EASEMENT CURB & GUTTER BUILDING RETAINING WALL CHAINLINK FENCE SIGN PIPE BOLLARD STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVING HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT PAVING CONCRETE PAVING PROPERTY LIMIT EXISTINGPROPOSED WETLAND LIMITS TREELINE 0 NORTH SCALE IN FEET 30 60 Feb 22, 2021 - 1:21pm - User:jworkman L:\PROJECTS\21672.01\CAD\Civil\Sheets\21672.01 - L1 - LSCP.dwg L1.01 LANDSCAPEPLAN - EASTPARKING LOT LANDSCAPE NOTES 1.ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO RECEIVE 4" OF TOPSOIL. 2.SEEDED AREAS TO BE COVERED WITH A NORTH AMERICAN GREEN SC 150 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET. 3.INSTALL PROFESSIONAL LANDSCAPE EDGING AS REQUIRED. 4.INSTALL 4" COCOA BROWN HARDWOOD MULCH FROM WEST METRO SUPPLY OVER NON-WOVEN SOIL SEPARATION FABRIC IN PLANTING BEDS. LIGHT POLE TREES CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT CAL SIZE QTY AB Acer freemanii `Autumn Blaze` / Autumn Blaze Maple B & B 2.5"Cal 3 WS Betula papyrifera `Whitespire` / Whitespire Birch B & B Clump 10`3 ORN. TREES CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT CAL SIZE QTY IL Syringa reticulata `Ivory Silk` / Ivory Silk Japanese Tree Lilac B & B 2"Cal 10 SHRUBS CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT QTY CD Cornus sericea `Alleman`s Compact` / Dwarf Red Twig Dogwood 5 gal 6 HAB Hydrangea arborescens `Abetwo` / Incrediball Hydrangea 5 gal 3 SJL Spiraea japonica `Little Princess` / Japanese Spirea 5 gal 5 WSL Weigela x `Slingco 1` TM / Crimson Kisses Weigela 2 gal.6 PERENNIALS CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT QTY HHR Hemerocallis x `Happy Returns` / Happy Returns Daylily 1 gal 5 PSE Phlox subulata `Emerald Blue` / Emerald Blue Creeping Phlox 1 gal 10 GROUND COVERS CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT 33-261 MNDOT Seed Mix 33-261 / Ponds and Wet Areas Seed TUR HIG Turf Sod Highland Sod / Sod Sod PLANT SCHEDULE - EAST PARKING LOT Feb 22, 2021 - 3:00pm - User:jworkman L:\PROJECTS\21672.01\CAD\Civil\Sheets\21672.01 - C9 - DETL.dwg C9.01 DETAILS Project Location Date Submittal / RevisionNo. Certification Sheet Title Summary Revision History Sheet No.Revision Project No. By Designed:Drawn: Approved:Book / Page: Phase:Initial Issue: ClientISD # 270 MEADOWBROOKELEMENTARYPARKING LOTIMPROVEMENTS GOLDENVALLEY, MN 5430 GLENWOOD AVE. NT JRW NT PRELIM.1/11/2021 21672.01 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SET OF PLANS ANDSPECIFICATIONS WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDERMY DIRECT SUPERVISION, AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. NEIL TESSIER, PE. DATE REGISTRATION NO. 2/22/2021 26364 SAFEngineering, PLLC Site and Athletic Facility Engineering 3200 122nd Ave. NEBlaine, MN 55449612-213-9859nrtessier@gmail.com A D2'2'1 PLAN 12"12"2'VARIABLEFLOW LINE FLOW LINE BACK OF CURB FACE OF CURB NEEHAN R-2501 TYPE C GRATE 12" MIN.BITUMINOUS BITUMINOUS 6" MIN. 18" MIN.18" MIN. PUBLI C R O A D HARD S U RF A CE MI N 0 . 5 % G R A D E 20' MINI M U M 50' M I N I M U M MINIMUM 0.5% GRADE DOWN FROM PUBLIC STREET GEOTEXTILEUNDERLINER 4"- 6" DIAMETER CLEAN STONE 10" MINIMUM Feb 22, 2021 - 3:00pm - User:jworkman L:\PROJECTS\21672.01\CAD\Civil\Sheets\21672.01 - C9 - DETL.dwg C9.02 DETAILS Project Location Date Submittal / RevisionNo. Certification Sheet Title Summary Revision History Sheet No.Revision Project No. By Designed:Drawn: Approved:Book / Page: Phase:Initial Issue: ClientISD # 270 MEADOWBROOKELEMENTARYPARKING LOTIMPROVEMENTS GOLDENVALLEY, MN 5430 GLENWOOD AVE. NT JRW NT PRELIM.1/11/2021 21672.01 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SET OF PLANS ANDSPECIFICATIONS WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDERMY DIRECT SUPERVISION, AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. NEIL TESSIER, PE. DATE REGISTRATION NO. 2/22/2021 26364 SAFEngineering, PLLC Site and Athletic Facility Engineering 3200 122nd Ave. NEBlaine, MN 55449612-213-9859nrtessier@gmail.com SECTION A-A' PLAN SECTION B-B'6' MIN.3' MIN. A A' B' B6"VARIES3" MIN.6" TYP.12"6" 6"6"6' MIN. 2'R (T Y P.) WHITE LEGEND RED BACKGROUND R1-1 30"30"STANDARD RED AND WHITE SIGN R5-1 30"30"12" VEHICLE IDREQUIRED PARKING FOR VIOLATIONUP TO $200 FINE NO. R7-8B ACCESSIBLE VAN PROVIDE VAN ACCESSIBLE SIGN AT RIGHT HAND DISCHARGE PARKING SPACES STANDARD MNDOT SIGN NO. R7-8M NO PARKING ACCESS AISLE PROVIDE NOPARKING, ACCESSAISLE SIGN CENTEREDAT HEAD OF ACCESSIBLE ACCESS AISLE 18"X' Feb 22, 2021 - 3:00pm - User:jworkman L:\PROJECTS\21672.01\CAD\Civil\Sheets\21672.01 - C9 - DETL.dwg C9.03 DETAILS Project Location Date Submittal / RevisionNo. Certification Sheet Title Summary Revision History Sheet No.Revision Project No. By Designed:Drawn: Approved:Book / Page: Phase:Initial Issue: ClientISD # 270 MEADOWBROOKELEMENTARYPARKING LOTIMPROVEMENTS GOLDENVALLEY, MN 5430 GLENWOOD AVE. NT JRW NT PRELIM.1/11/2021 21672.01 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SET OF PLANS ANDSPECIFICATIONS WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDERMY DIRECT SUPERVISION, AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. NEIL TESSIER, PE. DATE REGISTRATION NO. 2/22/2021 26364 SAFEngineering, PLLC Site and Athletic Facility Engineering 3200 122nd Ave. NEBlaine, MN 55449612-213-9859nrtessier@gmail.com NOTE: CLEANOUT FITTINGS, INCLUDING THE WYE AND STACK SHALL BE DUCTILE IRON. 6" D.I.P. CLEANOUT STACK LENGTH AS REQUIRED FEMALE ADAPTOR DUCTILE IRON THREADED PLUG PLACE CASTING R-1976 OR APPROVED EQUAL ON CLEANOUTS IN PAVED AREAS FINISHED GRADE EXISTING SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM CONNECT NEW STACK TO EXISTING STACK WITH APPROVED FITTINGS ©2013 ADS, INC. PROJECT INFORMATION ADS SALES REP: ENGINEERED PRODUCT MANAGER: PROJECT NO: ADVANCED DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, INC. R MEADOWBROOK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GOLDEN VALLEY, MN TOM ROONEY 612-756-3552 TOM.ROONEY@ADS-PIPE.COM S184604 IMPORTANT - NOTES FOR THE BIDDING AND INSTALLATION OF THE SC-310 SYSTEM 1. STORMTECH SC-310 CHAMBERS SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED UNTIL THE MANUFACTURER'S REPRESENTATIVE HAS COMPLETED A PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING WITH THE INSTALLERS. 2. STORMTECH SC-310 CHAMBERS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE "STORMTECH SC-310/SC-740/DC-780 CONSTRUCTION GUIDE". 3. CHAMBERS ARE NOT TO BE BACKFILLED WITH A DOZER OR AN EXCAVATOR SITUATED OVER THE CHAMBERS. STORMTECH RECOMMENDS 3 BACKFILL METHODS: ·STONESHOOTER LOCATED OFF THE CHAMBER BED. ·BACKFILL AS ROWS ARE BUILT USING AN EXCAVATOR ON THE FOUNDATION STONE OR SUBGRADE. ·BACKFILL FROM OUTSIDE THE EXCAVATION USING A LONG BOOM HOE OR EXCAVATOR. 4. THE FOUNDATION STONE SHALL BE LEVELED AND COMPACTED PRIOR TO PLACING CHAMBERS. 5. JOINTS BETWEEN CHAMBERS SHALL BE PROPERLY SEATED PRIOR TO PLACING STONE. 6. MAINTAIN MINIMUM - 6" (150 mm) SPACING BETWEEN THE CHAMBER ROWS. 7. EMBEDMENT STONE SURROUNDING CHAMBERS MUST BE A CLEAN, CRUSHED, ANGULAR STONE 3/4-2" (20-50 mm). 8. THE CONTRACTOR MUST REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES WITH CHAMBER FOUNDATION MATERIALS BEARING CAPACITIES TO THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER. 9. ADS RECOMMENDS THE USE OF "FLEXSTORM CATCH IT" INSERTS DURING CONSTRUCTION FOR ALL INLETS TO PROTECT THE SUBSURFACE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FROM CONSTRUCTION SITE RUNOFF. NOTES FOR CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT 1. STORMTECH SC-310 CHAMBERS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE "STORMTECH SC-310/SC-740/DC-780 CONSTRUCTION GUIDE". 2. THE USE OF CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT OVER SC-310 & SC-740 CHAMBERS IS LIMITED: ·NO EQUIPMENT IS ALLOWED ON BARE CHAMBERS. ·NO RUBBER TIRED LOADERS, DUMP TRUCKS, OR EXCAVATORS ARE ALLOWED UNTIL PROPER FILL DEPTHS ARE REACHED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE "STORMTECH SC-310/SC-740/DC-780 CONSTRUCTION GUIDE". ·WEIGHT LIMITS FOR CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT CAN BE FOUND IN THE "STORMTECH SC-310/SC-740/DC-780 CONSTRUCTION GUIDE". 3. FULL 36" (900 mm) OF STABILIZED COVER MATERIALS OVER THE CHAMBERS IS REQUIRED FOR DUMP TRUCK TRAVEL OR DUMPING. USE OF A DOZER TO PUSH EMBEDMENT STONE BETWEEN THE ROWS OF CHAMBERS MAY CAUSE DAMAGE TO THE CHAMBERS AND IS NOT AN ACCEPTABLE BACKFILL METHOD. ANY CHAMBERS DAMAGED BY THE "DUMP AND PUSH" METHOD ARE NOT COVERED UNDER THE STORMTECH STANDARD WARRANTY. CONTACT STORMTECH AT 1-888-892-2694 WITH ANY QUESTIONS ON INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS OR WEIGHT LIMITS FOR CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT. SC-310 STORMTECH CHAMBER SPECIFICATIONS 1. CHAMBERS SHALL BE STORMTECH SC-310. 2. CHAMBERS SHALL BE ARCH-SHAPED AND SHALL BE MANUFACTURED FROM VIRGIN, IMPACT-MODIFIED POLYPROPYLENE OR POLYETHYLENE COPOLYMERS. 3. CHAMBERS SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM F2922 (POLETHYLENE) OR ASTM F2418-16a (POLYPROPYLENE), "STANDARD SPECIFICATION FOR CORRUGATED WALL STORMWATER COLLECTION CHAMBERS". 4. CHAMBER ROWS SHALL PROVIDE CONTINUOUS, UNOBSTRUCTED INTERNAL SPACE WITH NO INTERNAL SUPPORTS THAT WOULD IMPEDE FLOW OR LIMIT ACCESS FOR INSPECTION. 5. THE STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF THE CHAMBERS, THE STRUCTURAL BACKFILL, AND THE INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS SHALL ENSURE THAT THE LOAD FACTORS SPECIFIED IN THE AASHTO LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS, SECTION 12.12, ARE MET FOR: 1) LONG-DURATION DEAD LOADS AND 2) SHORT-DURATION LIVE LOADS, BASED ON THE AASHTO DESIGN TRUCK WITH CONSIDERATION FOR IMPACT AND MULTIPLE VEHICLE PRESENCES. 6. CHAMBERS SHALL BE DESIGNED, TESTED AND ALLOWABLE LOAD CONFIGURATIONS DETERMINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM F2787, "STANDARD PRACTICE FOR STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF THERMOPLASTIC CORRUGATED WALL STORMWATER COLLECTION CHAMBERS". LOAD CONFIGURATIONS SHALL INCLUDE: 1) INSTANTANEOUS (<1 MIN) AASHTO DESIGN TRUCK LIVE LOAD ON MINIMUM COVER 2) MAXIMUM PERMANENT (75-YR) COVER LOAD AND 3) ALLOWABLE COVER WITH PARKED (1-WEEK) AASHTO DESIGN TRUCK. 7. REQUIREMENTS FOR HANDLING AND INSTALLATION: ·TO MAINTAIN THE WIDTH OF CHAMBERS DURING SHIPPING AND HANDLING, CHAMBERS SHALL HAVE INTEGRAL, INTERLOCKING STACKING LUGS. ·TO ENSURE A SECURE JOINT DURING INSTALLATION AND BACKFILL, THE HEIGHT OF THE CHAMBER JOINT SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN 2”. ·TO ENSURE THE INTEGRITY OF THE ARCH SHAPE DURING INSTALLATION, a) THE ARCH STIFFNESS CONSTANT AS DEFINED IN SECTION 6.2.8 OF ASTM F2922 SHALL BE GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO 400 LBS/IN/IN. AND b) TO RESIST CHAMBER DEFORMATION DURING INSTALLATION AT ELEVATED TEMPERATURES (ABOVE 73° F / 23° C), CHAMBERS SHALL BE PRODUCED FROM REFLECTIVE GOLD OR YELLOW COLORS. 8. ONLY CHAMBERS THAT ARE APPROVED BY THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER WILL BE ALLOWED. UPON REQUEST BY THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER OR OWNER, THE CHAMBER MANUFACTURER SHALL SUBMIT A STRUCTURAL EVALUATION FOR APPROVAL BEFORE DELIVERING CHAMBERS TO THE PROJECT SITE AS FOLLOWS: ·THE STRUCTURAL EVALUATION SHALL BE SEALED BY A REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER. ·THE STRUCTURAL EVALUATION SHALL DEMONSTRATE THAT THE SAFETY FACTORS ARE GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO 1.95 FOR DEAD LOAD AND 1.75 FOR LIVE LOAD, THE MINIMUM REQUIRED BY ASTM F2787 AND BY SECTIONS 3 AND 12.12 OF THE AASHTO LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS FOR THERMOPLASTIC PIPE. ·THE TEST DERIVED CREEP MODULUS AS SPECIFIED IN ASTM F2922 SHALL BE USED FOR PERMANENT DEAD LOAD DESIGN EXCEPT THAT IT SHALL BE THE 75-YEAR MODULUS USED FOR DESIGN. 9. CHAMBERS AND END CAPS SHALL BE PRODUCED AT AN ISO 9001 CERTIFIED MANUFACTURING FACILITY. FOR STORMTECH INSTRUCTIONS, DOWNLOAD THE INSTALLATION APP DAN MURPHY 218-341-3095 DAN.MURPHY@ADS-PIPE.COM ©2013 ADS, INC. SC-160LP STORMTECH CHAMBER SPECIFICATIONS 1. CHAMBERS SHALL BE STORMTECH SC-160LP. 2. CHAMBERS SHALL BE ARCH-SHAPED AND SHALL BE MANUFACTURED FROM VIRGIN, IMPACT-MODIFIED POLYPROPYLENE COPOLYMERS. 3. CHAMBERS SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM F2418-16a, "STANDARD SPECIFICATION FOR POLYPROPYLENE (PP) CORRUGATED WALL STORMWATER COLLECTION CHAMBERS". 4. CHAMBER ROWS SHALL PROVIDE CONTINUOUS, UNOBSTRUCTED INTERNAL SPACE WITH NO INTERNAL SUPPORTS THAT WOULD IMPEDE FLOW OR LIMIT ACCESS FOR INSPECTION. 5. THE STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF THE CHAMBERS, THE STRUCTURAL BACKFILL, AND THE INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS SHALL ENSURE THAT THE LOAD FACTORS SPECIFIED IN THE AASHTO LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS, SECTION 12.12, ARE MET FOR: 1) LONG-DURATION DEAD LOADS AND 2) SHORT-DURATION LIVE LOADS, BASED ON THE AASHTO DESIGN TRUCK WITH CONSIDERATION FOR IMPACT AND MULTIPLE VEHICLE PRESENCES. 6. CHAMBERS SHALL BE DESIGNED, TESTED AND ALLOWABLE LOAD CONFIGURATIONS DETERMINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM F2787, "STANDARD PRACTICE FOR STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF THERMOPLASTIC CORRUGATED WALL STORMWATER COLLECTION CHAMBERS". LOAD CONFIGURATIONS SHALL INCLUDE: 1) INSTANTANEOUS (<1 MIN) AASHTO DESIGN TRUCK LIVE LOAD ON MINIMUM COVER 2) MAXIMUM PERMANENT (75-YR) COVER LOAD AND 3) ALLOWABLE COVER WITH PARKED (1-WEEK) AASHTO DESIGN TRUCK. 7. REQUIREMENTS FOR HANDLING AND INSTALLATION: ·TO MAINTAIN THE WIDTH OF CHAMBERS DURING SHIPPING AND HANDLING, CHAMBERS SHALL HAVE INTEGRAL, INTERLOCKING STACKING LUGS. ·TO ENSURE A SECURE JOINT DURING INSTALLATION AND BACKFILL, THE HEIGHT OF THE CHAMBER JOINT SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN 1.5”. ·TO ENSURE THE INTEGRITY OF THE ARCH SHAPE DURING INSTALLATION, a) THE ARCH STIFFNESS CONSTANT AS DEFINED IN SECTION 6.2.8 OF ASTM F2418 SHALL BE GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO 400 LBS/IN/IN. AND b) TO RESIST CHAMBER DEFORMATION DURING INSTALLATION AT ELEVATED TEMPERATURES (ABOVE 73° F / 23° C), CHAMBERS SHALL BE PRODUCED FROM REFLECTIVE GOLD OR YELLOW COLORS. 8. ONLY CHAMBERS THAT ARE APPROVED BY THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER WILL BE ALLOWED. UPON REQUEST BY THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER OR OWNER, THE CHAMBER MANUFACTURER SHALL SUBMIT A STRUCTURAL EVALUATION FOR APPROVAL BEFORE DELIVERING CHAMBERS TO THE PROJECT SITE AS FOLLOWS: ·THE STRUCTURAL EVALUATION SHALL BE SEALED BY A REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER. ·THE STRUCTURAL EVALUATION SHALL DEMONSTRATE THAT THE SAFETY FACTORS ARE GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO 1.95 FOR DEAD LOAD AND 1.75 FOR LIVE LOAD, THE MINIMUM REQUIRED BY ASTM F2787 AND BY SECTIONS 3 AND 12.12 OF THE AASHTO LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS FOR THERMOPLASTIC PIPE. ·THE TEST DERIVED CREEP MODULUS AS SPECIFIED IN ASTM F2418 SHALL BE USED FOR PERMANENT DEAD LOAD DESIGN EXCEPT THAT IT SHALL BE THE 75-YEAR MODULUS USED FOR DESIGN. 9. CHAMBERS AND END CAPS SHALL BE PRODUCED AT AN ISO 9001 CERTIFIED MANUFACTURING FACILITY. IMPORTANT - NOTES FOR THE BIDDING AND INSTALLATION OF THE SC-160LP SYSTEM 1. STORMTECH SC-160LP CHAMBERS SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED UNTIL THE MANUFACTURER'S REPRESENTATIVE HAS COMPLETED A PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING WITH THE INSTALLERS. 2. STORMTECH SC-160LP CHAMBERS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE "STORMTECH SC-160LP CONSTRUCTION GUIDE". 3. FOUNDATION STONE AND EMBEDMENT STONE SURROUNDING CHAMBERS MUST BE A CLEAN, CRUSHED, ANGULAR STONE; AASHTO M43 #3,357, 4, 467, 5, 56, OR 57. 4. THE FOUNDATION STONE SHALL BE LEVELED AND COMPACTED PRIOR TO PLACING CHAMBERS. 5. THE DEPTH OF FOUNDATION STONE SHALL BE DETERMINED BASED ON THE SUBGRADE BEARING CAPACITY PROVIDED BY THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER. 6. THE CONTRACTOR MUST REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES CONCERNING CHAMBER FOUNDATION DESIGN AND SUBGRADE BEARING CAPACITIES TO THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER. 7. JOINTS BETWEEN CHAMBERS SHALL BE PROPERLY SEATED PRIOR TO PLACING STONE. 8. CHAMBERS SHALL BE INSTALLED "TOE TO TOE". NO ADDITIONAL SPACING BETWEEN ROWS IS REQUIRED. 9. STORMTECH RECOMMENDS 3 BACKFILL METHODS: ·STONESHOOTER LOCATED OFF THE CHAMBER BED. ·BACKFILL AS ROWS ARE BUILT USING AN EXCAVATOR ON THE FOUNDATION STONE OR SUBGRADE. ·BACKFILL FROM OUTSIDE THE EXCAVATION USING A LONG BOOM HOE OR EXCAVATOR. 10. ADS RECOMMENDS THE USE OF "FLEXSTORM CATCH IT" INSERTS DURING CONSTRUCTION FOR ALL INLETS TO PROTECT THE SUBSURFACE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FROM CONSTRUCTION SITE RUNOFF. NOTES FOR CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT 1. THE USE OF CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT OVER SC-160LP CHAMBERS IS LIMITED: ·NO EQUIPMENT IS ALLOWED ON BARE CHAMBERS. ·NO RUBBER TIRED LOADERS, DUMP TRUCKS, OR EXCAVATORS ARE ALLOWED UNTIL PROPER FILL DEPTHS ARE REACHED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE "STORMTECH SC-160LP CONSTRUCTION GUIDE". ·WEIGHT LIMITS FOR CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT CAN BE FOUND IN THE "STORMTECH SC-106LP CONSTRUCTION GUIDE". 3. FULL 36" (900 mm) OF STABILIZED COVER MATERIALS OVER THE CHAMBERS IS REQUIRED FOR DUMP TRUCK TRAVEL OR DUMPING. CONTACT STORMTECH AT 1-888-892-2694 WITH ANY QUESTIONS ON INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS OR WEIGHT LIMITS FOR CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT. FOR STORMTECH INSTRUCTIONS, DOWNLOAD THE INSTALLATION APP ©2013 ADS, INC. BAYSAVER BAYFILTER SPECIFICATIONS PRODUCTS A.INTERNAL COMPONENTS: ALL COMPONENTS INCLUDING CONCRETE STRUCTURE(S), PVC MANIFOLD PIPING AND FILTER CARTRIDGES, SHALL BE PROVIDED BY BAYSAVER TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 1030 DEER HOLLOW DRIVE, MOUNT AIRY, MD (800.229.7283). B.PVC MANIFOLD PIPING: ALL INTERNAL PVC PIPE AND FITTINGS SHALL MEET ASTM D1785. MANIFOLD PIPING SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE CONTRACTOR PARTIALLY PRE-CUT AND PRE-ASSEMBLED. C.FILTER CARTRIDGES: EXTERNAL SHELL OF THE FILTER CARTRIDGES SHALL BE SUBSTANTIALLY CONSTRUCTED OF POLYETHYLENE OR EQUIVALENT MATERIAL ACCEPTABLE TO THE MANUFACTURER. FILTRATION MEDIA SHALL BE ARRANGED IN A SPIRAL LAYERED FASHION TO MAXIMIZE AVAILABLE FILTRATION AREA. AN ORIFICE PLATE SHALL BE SUPPLIED WITH EACH CARTRIDGE TO RESTRICT THE FLOW RATE TO A MAXIMUM OF 45 GPM. D.FILTER MEDIA: FILTER MEDIA SHALL BE BY BAYSAVER TECHNOLOGIES LLC AND SHALL CONSIST OF THE FOLLOWING MIX: A BLEND OF ZEOLITE, PERLITE AND ACTIVATED ALUMINA. E.PRECAST CONCRETE VAULT: CONCRETE STRUCTURES SHALL BE PROVIDED ACCORDING TO ASTM C. THE MATERIALS AND STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF THE DEVICES SHALL BE PER ASTM C478, C857 AND C858. PRECAST CONCRETE SHALL BE PROVIDED BY BAYSAVER TECHNOLOGIES, LLC. PERFORMANCE A. THE STORMWATER FILTER SYSTEM SHALL BE AN OFFLINE DESIGN CAPABLE OF TREATING 100% OF THE REQUIRED TREATMENT FLOW AT FULL SEDIMENT LOAD CONDITIONS. B. THE STORMWATER FILTER SYSTEM'S CARTRIDGES SHALL HAVE NO MOVING PARTS. C. THE STORMWATER TREATMENT UNIT SHALL BE DESIGNED TO REMOVE AT LEAST 85% OF SUSPENDED SOLIDS, 65% OF TOTAL PHOSPHORUS, 65% OF TURBIDITY, 40% OF TOTAL COPPER, AND 40% OF TOTAL ZINC BASED ON FIELD DATA COLLECTED IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE RECIPROCITY PARTNERSHIP TIER II TEST PROTOCOL. D. THE STORMWATER FILTRATION SYSTEM SHALL REDUCE INCOMING TURBIDITY (MEASURED AS NTUs) BY 50% OR MORE AND SHALL NOT HAVE ANY COMPONENTS THAT LEACH NITRATES OR PHOSPHATES. E. THE STORMWATER FILTRATION CARTRIDGE SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A HYDRODYNAMIC BACKWASH MECHANISM TO EXTEND THE FILTER'S LIFE AND OPTIMIZE ITS PERFORMANCE. F. THE STORMWATER FILTRATION SYSTEM SHALL BE DESIGNED TO REMOVE A MINIMUM OF 65% OF THE INCOMING TOTAL PHOSPHORUS (TP) LOAD. G. THE STORMWATER FILTRATION SYSTEM'S CARTRIDGES SHALL HAVE A TREATED SEDIMENT CAPACITY FOR 80% TSS REMOVAL BETWEEN 150-350 LBS. BAYFILTER MAINTENANCE THE BAYFILTER SYSTEM REQUIRES PERIODIC MAINTENANCE TO CONTINUE OPERATING AT ITS PEAK EFFICIENCY DESIGN. THE MAINTENANCE PROCESS COMPRISES THE REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT OF EACH BAYFILTER CARTRIDGE AND THE CLEANING OF THE VAULT OR MANHOLE WITH A VACUUM TRUCK. FOR BEST RESULTS, BAYFILTER MAINTENANCE SHOULD BE PERFORMED BY A CERTIFIED MAINTENANCE CONTRACTOR. A QUICK CALL TO AN ADS ENGINEER OR CUSTOMER SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE WILL PROVIDE YOU WITH A LIST OF RELIABLE CONTRACTORS IN YOUR AREA. WHEN BAYFILTER IS INITIALLY INSTALLED, WE RECOMMEND THAT AN INSPECTION BE PERFORMED ON THE SYSTEM IN THE FIRST SIX (6) MONTHS. AFTER THAT, THE INSPECTION CYCLE TYPICALLY FALLS INTO A BIANNUAL PATTERN GIVEN NORMAL STORM OCCURRENCE AND ACTUAL SOLIDS LOADS. WHEN BAYFILTER EXHIBITS FLOWS BELOW DESIGN LEVELS, THE SYSTEM SHOULD BE INSPECTED AND MAINTAINED AS SOON AS PRACTICAL. REPLACING A BAYFILTER CARTRIDGE SHOULD BE CONSIDERED AT OR ABOVE THE LEVEL OF THE MANIFOLD. MAINTENANCE PROCEDURES 1. REMOVE THE MANHOLE COVERS AND OPEN ALL ACCESS HATCHES. 2. BEFORE ENTERING THE SYSTEM MAKE SURE THE AIR IS SAFE PER OSHA STANDARDS OR USE A BREATHING APPARATUS. USE LOW O2, HIGH CO, OR OTHER APPLICABLE WARNING DEVICES PER REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS. 3. USING A VACUUM TRUCK, REMOVE ANY LIQUID AND SEDIMENTS THAT CAN BE REMOVED PRIOR TO ENTRY. 4. USING A SMALL LIFT OR THE BOOM OF THE VACUUM TRUCK, REMOVE THE USED CARTRIDGES BY LIFTING THEM OUT. 5. ANY CARTRIDGES THAT CANNOT BE READILY LIFTED CAN BE EASILY SLID ALONG THE FLOOR TO A LOCATION THEY CAN BE LIFTED VIA A BOOM LIFT. 6. WHEN ALL THE CARTRIDGES HAVE BEEN REMOVED, IT IS NOW PRACTICAL TO REMOVE THE BALANCE OF THE SOLIDS AND WATER. LOOSEN THE STAINLESS CLAMPS ON THE FERNCO COUPLINGS FOR THE MANIFOLD AND REMOVE THE DRAINPIPES AS WELL. CAREFULLY CAP THE MANIFOLD AND THE FERNCO'S AND RINSE THE FLOOR, WASHING AWAY THE BALANCE OF ANY REMAINING COLLECTED SOLIDS. 7. CLEAN THE MANIFOLD PIPES, INSPECT, AND REINSTALL. 8. INSTALL THE EXCHANGE CARTRIDGES AND CLOSE ALL COVERS. 9. THE USED CARTRIDGES MUST BE SENT BACK TO ADS FOR EXCHANGE/RECYCLING AND CREDIT ON UNDAMAGED UNITS. BAYFILTER INSTALLATION NOTES 1. CONTACT UTILITY LOCATOR TO MARK ANY NEARBY UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND MAKE SURE IT IS SAFE TO EXCAVATE. 2. REFERENCE THE SITE PLAN AND STAKE OUT THE LOCATION OF THE BAYFILTER VAULT. 3. EXCAVATE THE HOLE, PROVIDING ANY SHEETING AND SHORING NECESSARY TO COMPLY WITH ALL FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL SAFETY REGULATIONS. 4. LEVEL THE SUB–GRADE TO THE PROPER ELEVATION. VERIFY THE ELEVATION AGAINST THE MANHOLE DIMENSIONS, THE INVERT ELEVATIONS, AND THE SITE PLANS. ADJUST THE BASE AGGREGATE, IF NECESSARY. 5. HAVE THE SOIL BEARING CAPACITY VERIFIED BY A LICENSED/ENGINEER FOR THE REQUIRED LOAD BEARING CAPACITY. ON SOLID SUB–GRADE, SET THE FIRST SECTION OF THE BAYFILTER PRE–CAST VAULT. 6. CHECK THE LEVEL AND ELEVATION OF THE FIRST SECTION TO ENSURE IT IS CORRECT BEFORE ADDING ANY RISER SECTIONS. 7. IF ADDITIONAL SECTION(S) ARE REQUIRED, ADD A WATERTIGHT SEAL TO THE FIRST SECTION OF THE BAYFILTER VAULT. SET ADDITIONAL SECTION(S) OF THE VAULT, ADDING A WATERTIGHT SEAL TO EACH JOINT. 8. INSTALL THE PVC OUTLET MANIFOLD. 9. INSTALL THE PVC OUTLET PIPE IN BAYFILTER VAULT. 10. INSTALL THE INLET PIPE TO THE BAYFILTER VAULT. 11. AFTER THE SITE IS STABILIZED, REMOVE ANY ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT OR DEBRIS FROM THE VAULT AND INSTALL THE FLOW DISKS, DRAINDOWN MODULES (IF APPLICABLE), AND THE BAYFILTER CARTRIDGES. 12. PLACE FULL SET OF HOLD DOWN BARS AND BRACKETS INTO PLACE. 0015'30'SHEET OFDATE:PROJECT #:DRAWN:CHECKED:THIS DRAWING HAS BEEN PREPARED BASED ON INFORMATION PROVIDED TO ADS UNDER THE DIRECTION OF THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER OR OTHER PROJECT REPRESENTATIVE. THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER SHALL REVIEW THIS DRAWING PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. IT IS THE ULTIMATERESPONSIBILITY OF THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER TO ENSURE THAT THE PRODUCT(S) DEPICTED AND ALL ASSOCIATED DETAILS MEET ALL APPLICABLE LAWS, REGULATIONS, AND PROJECT REQUIREMENTS.4640 TRUEMAN BLVDHILLIARD, OH 43026ADVANCED DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, INC.R4 125-21-20S184604SMACKMSMEADOWBROOK ELEMENTARY SCHOOLGOLDEN VALLEY, MNDATE DRWN CHKDDESCRIPTION06-10-2020 NSL CJDREVISED PER COMMENTS06-25-2020 NSL CJD REVISED PER UPDATED DESIGN GUIDANCE07-25-2020 NSL CJDREVISED PER ENGINEER COMMENTS09-19-2020 NSL CJDREVISED PER ENGINEER COMMENTS10-05-20 NSL CJDREVISED PER ENGINEER COMMENTS6" ADS N-12 DUAL WALL PERFORATED HDPE UNDERDRAIN (SIZE TBD BY ENGINEER) ISOLATOR ROW (SEE DETAIL / TYP 2 PLACES) NOTES ·MANIFOLD SIZE TO BE DETERMINED BY SITE DESIGN ENGINEER. SEE TECHNICAL NOTE 6.32 FOR MANIFOLD SIZING GUIDANCE. ·DUE TO THE ADAPTATION OF THIS CHAMBER SYSTEM TO SPECIFIC SITE AND DESIGN CONSTRAINTS, IT MAY BE NECESSARY TO CUT AND COUPLE ADDITIONAL PIPE TO STANDARD MANIFOLD COMPONENTS IN THE FIELD. ·THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER MUST REVIEW ELEVATIONS AND IF NECESSARY ADJUST GRADING TO ENSURE THE CHAMBER COVER REQUIREMENTS ARE MET. ·THIS CHAMBER SYSTEM WAS DESIGNED WITHOUT SITE-SPECIFIC INFORMATION ON SOIL CONDITIONS OR BEARING CAPACITY. THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINING THE SUITABILITY OF THE SOIL AND PROVIDING THE BEARING CAPACITY OF THE INSITU SOILS. THE BASE STONE DEPTH MAY BE INCREASED OR DECREASED ONCE THIS INFORMATION IS PROVIDED. ·THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER MUST REVIEW THE PROXIMITY OF THE CHAMBERS TO THE SLOPE AND CONSIDER EFFECTS OF POSSIBLE SATURATED SOILS ON THE SLOPE'S INTEGRITY.520 CROMWELL AVENUE | ROCKY HILL | CT | 06067860-529-8188 |888-892-2694 | WWW.STORMTECH.COMDetention Retention Water QualityPLACE MINIMUM 12.5' OF ADS GEOSYNTHETICS 315WTK WOVEN GEOTEXTILE OVER BEDDING STONE AND UNDERNEATH CHAMBER FEET FOR SCOUR PROTECTION AT ALL CHAMBER INLET ROWS 12" PREFABRICATED END CAP, PART# SC310EPE12B TYP OF ALL SC-310 12" BOTTOM CONNECTIONS AND ISOLATOR ROWS PROPOSED LAYOUT : NORTH SYSTEM 98 STORMTECH SC-310 CHAMBERS 15 STORMTECH SC-310 END CAPS 6 STONE ABOVE (in) 6 STONE BELOW (in) 40 % STONE VOID 3317 INSTALLED SYSTEM VOLUME (CF) (PERIMETER STONE INCLUDED) 2624 SYSTEM AREA (ft²) 267 SYSTEM PERIMETER (ft) PROPOSED ELEVATIONS : NORTH SYSTEM 862.17 MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE GRADE (TOP OF PAVEMENT/UNPAVED) 856.17 MINIMUM ALLOWABLE GRADE (UNPAVED WITH TRAFFIC) 855.67 MINIMUM ALLOWABLE GRADE (UNPAVED NO TRAFFIC) 855.67 MINIMUM ALLOWABLE GRADE (BASE OF FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT) 855.67 MINIMUM ALLOWABLE GRADE (TOP OF RIGID PAVEMENT) 854.67 TOP OF STONE 854.17 TOP OF SC-310 CHAMBER 853.13 8" TOP MANIFOLD INVERT 852.92 12" ISOLATOR ROW CONNECTION INVERT 852.92 12" BOTTOM CONNECTION INVERT 852.84 BOTTOM OF SC-310 CHAMBER 852.34 UNDERDRAIN INVERT 852.34 BOTTOM OF STONE STRUCTURE MH2 PER PLAN MAXIMUM INLET FLOW 2.3 CFS (DESIGNED BY ENGINEER / PROVIDED BY OTHERS) 8" X 8" ADS N-12 TOP MANIFOLD MAXIMUM INLET FLOW 2.3 CFS INVERT 3.5" ABOVE CHAMBER BASE (SEE NOTES) ADS N-12 CONNECTION INVERT 852.34 SIZE TBD BY ENGINEER PROPOSED BAYFILTER (SEE SHEET 5) STRUCTURE MH4 PER PLAN (DESIGNED BY ENGINEER / PROVIDED BY OTHERS) STRUCTURE MH3 PER PLAN (DESIGNED BY ENGINEER / PROVIDED BY OTHERS)STRUCTURE MH1 PER PLAN MAXIMUM OUTLET FLOW 2.7 CFS (DESIGNED BY ENGINEER / PROVIDED BY OTHERS) 100.83' 109.64'23.93'21.33'8" X 8" ADS N-12 TOP MANIFOLD INVERT 3.5" ABOVE CHAMBER BASE (SEE NOTES) 12" ADS N-12 BOTTOM CONNECTION INVERT 0.9" ABOVE CHAMBER BASE (SEE NOTES) STANDARD SC-310 END CAP TO TERMINATE ISOLATOR ROW IN FROM CB3 CB2 OUT AS NOTEDSHEET OFDATE:PROJECT #:DRAWN:CHECKED:THIS DRAWING HAS BEEN PREPARED BASED ON INFORMATION PROVIDED TO ADS UNDER THE DIRECTION OF THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER OR OTHER PROJECT REPRESENTATIVE. THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER SHALL REVIEW THIS DRAWING PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. IT IS THE ULTIMATERESPONSIBILITY OF THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER TO ENSURE THAT THE PRODUCT(S) DEPICTED AND ALL ASSOCIATED DETAILS MEET ALL APPLICABLE LAWS, REGULATIONS, AND PROJECT REQUIREMENTS.4640 TRUEMAN BLVDHILLIARD, OH 43026ADVANCED DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, INC.R5 125-21-20S184604SMACKMSMEADOWBROOK ELEMENTARY SCHOOLGOLDEN VALLEY, MNDATE DRWN CHKDDESCRIPTION06-10-2020 NSL CJDREVISED PER COMMENTS06-25-2020 NSL CJD REVISED PER UPDATED DESIGN GUIDANCE07-25-2020 NSL CJDREVISED PER ENGINEER COMMENTS09-19-2020 NSL CJDREVISED PER ENGINEER COMMENTS10-05-20 NSL CJDREVISED PER ENGINEER COMMENTSSECTION A-A SCALE : 1/4" = 1' PLAN VIEW SCALE : 1/4" = 1' OUTLET COLLECTION MANIFOLD POLYMER SEAL INLET DRAINAGE MATERIAL MEDIA SPIRAL OUTLET DRAINAGE MATERIAL FLOW CONTROL ORIFICE AIR RELEASE VALVE OUTLET PIPE INLET PLATE FILTER LEG OUTLET PATHWAY BAYFILTER WATER QUALITY VOLUME CARTRIDGE DESIGN VOLUME DRAINAGE AREA # BAYFILTER CARTRIDGES TREATED SEDIMENT CAPACITY 1250 CF THE BAYFILTER STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM IS A STORMWATER FILTRATION DEVICE DESIGNED TO REMOVE FINE SEDIMENTS, HEAVY METALS, AND PHOSPORUS. THE BAYFILTER SYSTEM RELIES ON A SPIRAL WOUND MEDIA FILTER CARTRIDGE WITH APPROXIMATELY 45 SQUARE FEET OF FILTRATION AREA. THE FILTER CARTRIDGES ARE HOUSED IN A CONCRETE STRUCTURE THAT EVENLY DISTRIBUTES THE FLOW BETWEEN CARTRIDGES. THE SYSTEM IS INLINE WITH AN INTERNAL BYPASS WEIR THAT ROUTES HIGH INTENSITY STORMS AROUND THE CARTRIDGES. THE FILTER CARTRIDGES REMOVE POLLUTANTS FROM RUNOFF BY FILTRATION (INTERCEPTION/ATTACHMENT) AND ADSORPTION. 522 BAYFILTER 2778 CF --- 3 525 LBS UNIT #18-8-3 24" SOLID LID 856.00 48" X 60" ACCESS HATCH 2.13' [25.56"] 852.20 854.17 WQ ELEVATION 852.34 STEPS (TYP) 15" OUTLET PIPE 15" INLET PIPE 522 BAYFILTER CARTRIDGE (TYP) 3" FLEXIBLE COUPLER 3" PVC TEE W/FLOW DISK (TYP) 3" PVC OUTLET MANIFOLD DDMV-1 WEIR 6" INLET ORIFICE AAHOLD DOWN BAR (TYP) 522 BAYFILTER CARTRIDGE (TYP) 3" PVC PLUG (TYP) 3" PVC TEE W/FLOW DISK (TYP EACH CARTRIDGE LOCATION) 3" PVC OUTLET MANIFOLD 15" OUTLET PIPE 15" BYPASS CONNECTION PIPE INVERT 853.87 3" FLEXIBLE COUPLER (TYP) VERTICAL DRAIN DOWN MODULE (TYP) STEPS (TYP) 48" X 60" ACCESS HATCH 24" SOLID LID WEIR 854.33 ®1030 Deer Hollow Drive 1-800-BAYSAVERMount Airy, MD 21771 1-800-229-7283 15" INLET PIPE INVERT 852.34 1.52' [18.20"] INLET ORIFICE WE/ FLAPGATE 0.14' [1.69"] 853.87 PRIME ELEVATION 2.50'8.00'8.00' 15" PRIME INLET PIPE 3.13' [37.60"] 3.80' [45.60"]BYPASS ORIFICE INVERT: 854.33 BYPASS ORIFICE FROM MH1 (SYSTEM) TO MH2 (SYSTEM) IN FROM CB3 15" PRIME INLET PIPE INVERT 853.87 6" FLAP GATE RECESS VAULT FLOOR FOR FLAP VALVE TO OPEN 854.33 TOP OF WEIR ELEVATION OUT 852.98 0010'20'SHEET OFDATE:PROJECT #:DRAWN:CHECKED:THIS DRAWING HAS BEEN PREPARED BASED ON INFORMATION PROVIDED TO ADS UNDER THE DIRECTION OF THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER OR OTHER PROJECT REPRESENTATIVE. THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER SHALL REVIEW THIS DRAWING PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. IT IS THE ULTIMATERESPONSIBILITY OF THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER TO ENSURE THAT THE PRODUCT(S) DEPICTED AND ALL ASSOCIATED DETAILS MEET ALL APPLICABLE LAWS, REGULATIONS, AND PROJECT REQUIREMENTS.4640 TRUEMAN BLVDHILLIARD, OH 43026ADVANCED DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, INC.R6 125-21-20S184604SMACKMSMEADOWBROOK ELEMENTARY SCHOOLGOLDEN VALLEY, MNDATE DRWN CHKDDESCRIPTION06-10-2020 NSL CJDREVISED PER COMMENTS06-25-2020 NSL CJD REVISED PER UPDATED DESIGN GUIDANCE07-25-2020 NSL CJDREVISED PER ENGINEER COMMENTS09-19-2020 NSL CJDREVISED PER ENGINEER COMMENTS10-05-20 NSL CJDREVISED PER ENGINEER COMMENTSISOLATOR ROW (SEE DETAIL) NOTES ·MANIFOLD SIZE TO BE DETERMINED BY SITE DESIGN ENGINEER. SEE TECHNICAL NOTE 6.32 FOR MANIFOLD SIZING GUIDANCE. ·DUE TO THE ADAPTATION OF THIS CHAMBER SYSTEM TO SPECIFIC SITE AND DESIGN CONSTRAINTS, IT MAY BE NECESSARY TO CUT AND COUPLE ADDITIONAL PIPE TO STANDARD MANIFOLD COMPONENTS IN THE FIELD. ·THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER MUST REVIEW ELEVATIONS AND IF NECESSARY ADJUST GRADING TO ENSURE THE CHAMBER COVER REQUIREMENTS ARE MET. ·THIS CHAMBER SYSTEM WAS DESIGNED WITHOUT SITE-SPECIFIC INFORMATION ON SOIL CONDITIONS OR BEARING CAPACITY. THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINING THE SUITABILITY OF THE SOIL AND PROVIDING THE BEARING CAPACITY OF THE INSITU SOILS. THE BASE STONE DEPTH MAY BE INCREASED OR DECREASED ONCE THIS INFORMATION IS PROVIDED. ·THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER MUST REVIEW THE PROXIMITY OF THE CHAMBERS TO THE SLOPE AND CONSIDER EFFECTS OF POSSIBLE SATURATED SOILS ON THE SLOPE'S INTEGRITY.520 CROMWELL AVENUE | ROCKY HILL | CT | 06067860-529-8188 |888-892-2694 | WWW.STORMTECH.COMDetention Retention Water QualityPLACE MINIMUM 12.5' OF ADS GEOSYNTHETICS 315WTK WOVEN GEOTEXTILE OVER BEDDING STONE AND UNDERNEATH CHAMBER FEET FOR SCOUR PROTECTION AT ALL CHAMBER INLET ROWS PROPOSED BAYFILTER (SEE SHEET 7) STRUCTURE MH- PER PLAN (DESIGNED BY ENGINEER / PROVIDED BY OTHERS) STRUCTURE MH- PER PLAN (DESIGNED BY ENGINEER / PROVIDED BY OTHERS) STRUCTURE MH- PER PLAN (DESIGNED BY ENGINEER / PROVIDED BY OTHERS) STRUCTURE MH- PER PLAN (DESIGNED BY ENGINEER / PROVIDED BY OTHERS) IN FROM CB1 24" ADS N-12 BOTTOM CONNECTION INVERT 0.1" ABOVE CHAMBER BASE (SEE NOTES) 12" X 12" ADS N-12 TOP MANIFOLD MAXIMUM INLET FLOW 5.7 CFS INVERT 12.5" ABOVE CHAMBER BASE (SEE NOTES) 24" PREFABRICATED END CAP, PART# SC740EPE24B TYP OF ALL SC-740 24" CONNECTIONS AND ISOLATOR ROWS PROPOSED LAYOUT : SOUTH SYSTEM 32 STORMTECH SC-740 CHAMBERS 8 STORMTECH SC-740 END CAPS 6 STONE ABOVE (in) 6 STONE BELOW (in) 40 % STONE VOID 2294 INSTALLED SYSTEM VOLUME (CF) BETWEEN ELEVATIONS 853.55 - 856.12 (PERIMETER STONE INCLUDED) 1325 SYSTEM AREA (ft²) 170 SYSTEM PERIMETER (ft) PROPOSED ELEVATIONS : SOUTH SYSTEM 864.00 MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE GRADE (TOP OF PAVEMENT/UNPAVED) 858.00 MINIMUM ALLOWABLE GRADE (UNPAVED WITH TRAFFIC) 857.50 MINIMUM ALLOWABLE GRADE (UNPAVED NO TRAFFIC) 857.50 MINIMUM ALLOWABLE GRADE (BASE OF FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT) 857.50 MINIMUM ALLOWABLE GRADE (TOP OF RIGID PAVEMENT) 856.50 TOP OF STONE 856.00 TOP OF SC-740 CHAMBER 854.54 12" TOP MANIFOLD INVERT 853.51 24" BOTTOM CONNECTION INVERT 853.51 24" ISOLATOR ROW CONNECTION INVERT 853.50 BOTTOM OF SC-740 CHAMBER 853.00 BOTTOM OF STONE 20.50'18.50'64.64' 58.54' 12" BYPASS PIPE 15" PIPE 24" ADS N-12 BOTTOM CONNECTION INVERT 0.1" ABOVE CHAMBER BASE (TYP 2 PLACES) OUT 5 6 7 8 853.25 853.75 853.75 853.75 856.75 856.75 SECTION A-A SCALE : 1/4" = 1' PLAN VIEW SCALE : 1/4" = 1' OUTLET COLLECTION MANIFOLD POLYMER SEAL INLET DRAINAGE MATERIAL MEDIA SPIRAL OUTLET DRAINAGE MATERIAL FLOW CONTROL ORIFICE AIR RELEASE VALVE OUTLET PIPE INLET PLATE FILTER LEG OUTLET PATHWAY BAYFILTER WATER QUALITY VOLUME CARTRIDGE DESIGN VOLUME DRAINAGE AREA # BAYFILTER CARTRIDGES TREATED SEDIMENT CAPACITY 1250 CF THE BAYFILTER STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM IS A STORMWATER FILTRATION DEVICE DESIGNED TO REMOVE FINE SEDIMENTS, HEAVY METALS, AND PHOSPORUS. THE BAYFILTER SYSTEM RELIES ON A SPIRAL WOUND MEDIA FILTER CARTRIDGE WITH APPROXIMATELY 45 SQUARE FEET OF FILTRATION AREA. THE FILTER CARTRIDGES ARE HOUSED IN A CONCRETE STRUCTURE THAT EVENLY DISTRIBUTES THE FLOW BETWEEN CARTRIDGES. THE SYSTEM IS INLINE WITH AN INTERNAL BYPASS WEIR THAT ROUTES HIGH INTENSITY STORMS AROUND THE CARTRIDGES. THE FILTER CARTRIDGES REMOVE POLLUTANTS FROM RUNOFF BY FILTRATION (INTERCEPTION/ATTACHMENT) AND ADSORPTION. 522 BAYFILTER 2,294 CF --- 2 350 LBS UNIT #26-8-2 VAULT 24" SOLID LID 857.50 853.55 855.80 WQ ELEVATION STEPS (TYP) 15" OUTLET PIPE 15" INLET PIPE 522 BAYFILTER CARTRIDGE (TYP) 3" FLEXIBLE COUPLER 3" PVC TEE W/FLOW DISK (TYP) 3" PVC OUTLET MANIFOLD DDMV-1 WEIR 6" INLET ORIFICE AAAS NOTEDSHEET OFDATE:PROJECT #:DRAWN:CHECKED:THIS DRAWING HAS BEEN PREPARED BASED ON INFORMATION PROVIDED TO ADS UNDER THE DIRECTION OF THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER OR OTHER PROJECT REPRESENTATIVE. THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER SHALL REVIEW THIS DRAWING PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. IT IS THE ULTIMATERESPONSIBILITY OF THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER TO ENSURE THAT THE PRODUCT(S) DEPICTED AND ALL ASSOCIATED DETAILS MEET ALL APPLICABLE LAWS, REGULATIONS, AND PROJECT REQUIREMENTS.4640 TRUEMAN BLVDHILLIARD, OH 43026ADVANCED DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, INC.R7 125-21-20S184604SMACKMSMEADOWBROOK ELEMENTARY SCHOOLGOLDEN VALLEY, MNDATE DRWN CHKDDESCRIPTION06-10-2020 NSL CJDREVISED PER COMMENTS06-25-2020 NSL CJD REVISED PER UPDATED DESIGN GUIDANCE07-25-2020 NSL CJDREVISED PER ENGINEER COMMENTS09-19-2020 NSL CJDREVISED PER ENGINEER COMMENTS10-05-20 NSL CJDREVISED PER ENGINEER COMMENTSHOLD DOWN BAR (TYP) 522 BAYFILTER CARTRIDGE (TYP) 3" PVC PLUG (TYP) 3" PVC TEE W/FLOW DISK (TYP EACH CARTRIDGE LOCATION) 3" PVC OUTLET MANIFOLD 15" OUTLET PIPE INV: 853.55 3" FLEXIBLE COUPLER (TYP) VERTICAL DRAIN DOWN MODULE (TYP) STEPS (TYP) 36" X 48" ACCESS HATCH 24" SOLID LID ®1030 Deer Hollow Drive 1-800-BAYSAVERMount Airy, MD 21771 1-800-229-7283 6" ORIFICE W/ FLAP GATE 2.72' [32.64"] 12" PRIMING INLET PIPE 855.22 PRIME ELEVATION 15" PIPE INVERT 853.55 WEIR INV: 855.801.28' [15.36"]EMERGENCY OVERFLOW ORIFICE INV: 855.80 8.00'2.50'1.67' [20.00"] EMERGENCY OVERFLOW 12" BYPASS PIPE PROPOSED INV 855.47 12" INLET PIPE INVERT 855.00 4.67' [56.04"]4.00' [48.04"] 12" BYPASS PIPE INV. 855.47 6.00' 36" X 48" ACCESS HATCH 6" FLAP GATE RECESS VAULT FLOOR FOR FLAP VALVE TO OPEN IN FROM CB1 MH (SYSTEM) MH (SYSTEM) 855.00 855.47 12" BYPASS ORIFACE @ INV 855.22 7 8 853.55 853.75 853.70 853.80 SHEET OFDATE:PROJECT #:DRAWN:CHECKED:THIS DRAWING HAS BEEN PREPARED BASED ON INFORMATION PROVIDED TO ADS UNDER THE DIRECTION OF THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER OR OTHER PROJECT REPRESENTATIVE. THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER SHALL REVIEW THIS DRAWING PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. IT IS THE ULTIMATERESPONSIBILITY OF THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER TO ENSURE THAT THE PRODUCT(S) DEPICTED AND ALL ASSOCIATED DETAILS MEET ALL APPLICABLE LAWS, REGULATIONS, AND PROJECT REQUIREMENTS.4640 TRUEMAN BLVDHILLIARD, OH 43026ADVANCED DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, INC.R8 125-21-20S184604SMACKMSMEADOWBROOK ELEMENTARY SCHOOLGOLDEN VALLEY, MNDATE DRWN CHKDDESCRIPTION06-10-2020 NSL CJDREVISED PER COMMENTS06-25-2020 NSL CJD REVISED PER UPDATED DESIGN GUIDANCE07-25-2020 NSL CJDREVISED PER ENGINEER COMMENTS09-19-2020 NSL CJDREVISED PER ENGINEER COMMENTS10-05-20 NSL CJDREVISED PER ENGINEER COMMENTS520 CROMWELL AVENUE | ROCKY HILL | CT | 06067860-529-8188 |888-892-2694 | WWW.STORMTECH.COMDetention Retention Water QualityACCEPTABLE FILL MATERIALS: STORMTECH SC-310 CHAMBER SYSTEMS PLEASE NOTE: 1. THE LISTED AASHTO DESIGNATIONS ARE FOR GRADATIONS ONLY. THE STONE MUST ALSO BE CLEAN, CRUSHED, ANGULAR. FOR EXAMPLE, A SPECIFICATION FOR #4 STONE WOULD STATE: "CLEAN, CRUSHED, ANGULAR NO. 4 (AASHTO M43) STONE". 2. STORMTECH COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS ARE MET FOR 'A' LOCATION MATERIALS WHEN PLACED AND COMPACTED IN 6" (150 mm) (MAX) LIFTS USING TWO FULL COVERAGES WITH A VIBRATORY COMPACTOR. 3. WHERE INFILTRATION SURFACES MAY BE COMPROMISED BY COMPACTION, FOR STANDARD DESIGN LOAD CONDITIONS, A FLAT SURFACE MAY BE ACHIEVED BY RAKING OR DRAGGING WITHOUT COMPACTION EQUIPMENT. FOR SPECIAL LOAD DESIGNS, CONTACT STORMTECH FOR COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS. 4. ONCE LAYER 'C' IS PLACED, ANY SOIL/MATERIAL CAN BE PLACED IN LAYER 'D' UP TO THE FINISHED GRADE. MOST PAVEMENT SUBBASE SOILS CAN BE USED TO REPLACE THE MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS OF LAYER 'C' OR 'D' AT THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER'S DISCRETION. NOTES: 1. CHAMBERS SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM F2922 (POLETHYLENE) OR ASTM F2418-16a (POLYPROPYLENE), "STANDARD SPECIFICATION FOR CORRUGATED WALL STORMWATER COLLECTION CHAMBERS". 2. SC-310 CHAMBERS SHALL BE DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM F2787 "STANDARD PRACTICE FOR STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF THERMOPLASTIC CORRUGATED WALL STORMWATER COLLECTION CHAMBERS". 3. THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ASSESSING THE BEARING RESISTANCE (ALLOWABLE BEARING CAPACITY) OF THE SUBGRADE SOILS AND THE DEPTH OF FOUNDATION STONE WITH CONSIDERATION FOR THE RANGE OF EXPECTED SOIL MOISTURE CONDITIONS. 4. PERIMETER STONE MUST BE EXTENDED HORIZONTALLY TO THE EXCAVATION WALL FOR BOTH VERTICAL AND SLOPED EXCAVATION WALLS. 5. REQUIREMENTS FOR HANDLING AND INSTALLATION: ·TO MAINTAIN THE WIDTH OF CHAMBERS DURING SHIPPING AND HANDLING, CHAMBERS SHALL HAVE INTEGRAL, INTERLOCKING STACKING LUGS. ·TO ENSURE A SECURE JOINT DURING INSTALLATION AND BACKFILL, THE HEIGHT OF THE CHAMBER JOINT SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN 2”. ·TO ENSURE THE INTEGRITY OF THE ARCH SHAPE DURING INSTALLATION, a) THE ARCH STIFFNESS CONSTANT AS DEFINED IN SECTION 6.2.8 OF ASTM F2922 SHALL BE GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO 400 LBS/IN/IN. AND b) TO RESIST CHAMBER DEFORMATION DURING INSTALLATION AT ELEVATED TEMPERATURES (ABOVE 73° F / 23° C), CHAMBERS SHALL BE PRODUCED FROM REFLECTIVE GOLD OR YELLOW COLORS. MATERIAL LOCATION DESCRIPTION AASHTO MATERIAL CLASSIFICATIONS COMPACTION / DENSITY REQUIREMENT D FINAL FILL: FILL MATERIAL FOR LAYER 'D' STARTS FROM THE TOP OF THE 'C' LAYER TO THE BOTTOM OF FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT OR UNPAVED FINISHED GRADE ABOVE. NOTE THAT PAVEMENT SUBBASE MAY BE PART OF THE 'D' LAYER. ANY SOIL/ROCK MATERIALS, NATIVE SOILS, OR PER ENGINEER'S PLANS. CHECK PLANS FOR PAVEMENT SUBGRADE REQUIREMENTS.N/A PREPARE PER SITE DESIGN ENGINEER'S PLANS. PAVED INSTALLATIONS MAY HAVE STRINGENT MATERIAL AND PREPARATION REQUIREMENTS. C INITIAL FILL: FILL MATERIAL FOR LAYER 'C' STARTS FROM THE TOP OF THE EMBEDMENT STONE ('B' LAYER) TO 18" (450 mm) ABOVE THE TOP OF THE CHAMBER. NOTE THAT PAVEMENT SUBBASE MAY BE A PART OF THE 'C' LAYER. GRANULAR WELL-GRADED SOIL/AGGREGATE MIXTURES, <35% FINES OR PROCESSED AGGREGATE. MOST PAVEMENT SUBBASE MATERIALS CAN BE USED IN LIEU OF THIS LAYER. AASHTO M145¹ A-1, A-2-4, A-3 OR AASHTO M43¹ 3, 357, 4, 467, 5, 56, 57, 6, 67, 68, 7, 78, 8, 89, 9, 10 BEGIN COMPACTIONS AFTER 12" (300 mm) OF MATERIAL OVER THE CHAMBERS IS REACHED. COMPACT ADDITIONAL LAYERS IN 6" (150 mm) MAX LIFTS TO A MIN. 95% PROCTOR DENSITY FOR WELL GRADED MATERIAL AND 95% RELATIVE DENSITY FOR PROCESSED AGGREGATE MATERIALS. ROLLER GROSS VEHICLE WEIGHT NOT TO EXCEED 12,000 lbs (53 kN). DYNAMIC FORCE NOT TO EXCEED 20,000 lbs (89 kN). B EMBEDMENT STONE: FILL SURROUNDING THE CHAMBERS FROM THE FOUNDATION STONE ('A' LAYER) TO THE 'C' LAYER ABOVE.CLEAN, CRUSHED, ANGULAR STONE AASHTO M43¹ 3, 357, 4, 467, 5, 56, 57 NO COMPACTION REQUIRED. A FOUNDATION STONE: FILL BELOW CHAMBERS FROM THE SUBGRADE UP TO THE FOOT (BOTTOM) OF THE CHAMBER.CLEAN, CRUSHED, ANGULAR STONE AASHTO M43¹ 3, 357, 4, 467, 5, 56, 57 PLATE COMPACT OR ROLL TO ACHIEVE A FLAT SURFACE.2,3 D C B A 18" (450 mm) MIN* 8' (2.4 m) MAX 6" (150 mm) MIN 12" (300 mm) MIN 12" (300 mm) MIN34" (864 mm)6" (150 mm) MIN ADS GEOSYNTHETICS 601T NON-WOVEN GEOTEXTILE ALL AROUND CLEAN CRUSHED, ANGULAR STONE IN A & B LAYERS *TO BOTTOM OF FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT. FOR UNPAVED INSTALLATIONS WHERE RUTTING FROM VEHICLES MAY OCCUR, INCREASE COVER TO 24" (600 mm). PERIMETER STONE (SEE NOTE 4) EXCAVATION WALL (CAN BE SLOPED OR VERTICAL) SC-310 END CAP SUBGRADE SOILS (SEE NOTE 3) PAVEMENT LAYER (DESIGNED BY SITE DESIGN ENGINEER) DEPTH OF STONE TO BE DETERMINED BY SITE DESIGN ENGINEER 6" (150 mm) MIN 16" (406 mm) SHEET OFDATE:PROJECT #:DRAWN:CHECKED:THIS DRAWING HAS BEEN PREPARED BASED ON INFORMATION PROVIDED TO ADS UNDER THE DIRECTION OF THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER OR OTHER PROJECT REPRESENTATIVE. THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER SHALL REVIEW THIS DRAWING PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. IT IS THE ULTIMATERESPONSIBILITY OF THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER TO ENSURE THAT THE PRODUCT(S) DEPICTED AND ALL ASSOCIATED DETAILS MEET ALL APPLICABLE LAWS, REGULATIONS, AND PROJECT REQUIREMENTS.4640 TRUEMAN BLVDHILLIARD, OH 43026ADVANCED DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, INC.R9 125-21-20S184604SMACKMSMEADOWBROOK ELEMENTARY SCHOOLGOLDEN VALLEY, MNDATE DRWN CHKDDESCRIPTION06-10-2020 NSL CJDREVISED PER COMMENTS06-25-2020 NSL CJD REVISED PER UPDATED DESIGN GUIDANCE07-25-2020 NSL CJDREVISED PER ENGINEER COMMENTS09-19-2020 NSL CJDREVISED PER ENGINEER COMMENTS10-05-20 NSL CJDREVISED PER ENGINEER COMMENTSACCEPTABLE FILL MATERIALS: STORMTECH SC-740 CHAMBER SYSTEMS PLEASE NOTE: 1. THE LISTED AASHTO DESIGNATIONS ARE FOR GRADATIONS ONLY. THE STONE MUST ALSO BE CLEAN, CRUSHED, ANGULAR. FOR EXAMPLE, A SPECIFICATION FOR #4 STONE WOULD STATE: "CLEAN, CRUSHED, ANGULAR NO. 4 (AASHTO M43) STONE". 2. STORMTECH COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS ARE MET FOR 'A' LOCATION MATERIALS WHEN PLACED AND COMPACTED IN 6" (150 mm) (MAX) LIFTS USING TWO FULL COVERAGES WITH A VIBRATORY COMPACTOR. 3. WHERE INFILTRATION SURFACES MAY BE COMPROMISED BY COMPACTION, FOR STANDARD DESIGN LOAD CONDITIONS, A FLAT SURFACE MAY BE ACHIEVED BY RAKING OR DRAGGING WITHOUT COMPACTION EQUIPMENT. FOR SPECIAL LOAD DESIGNS, CONTACT STORMTECH FOR COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS. 4. ONCE LAYER 'C' IS PLACED, ANY SOIL/MATERIAL CAN BE PLACED IN LAYER 'D' UP TO THE FINISHED GRADE. MOST PAVEMENT SUBBASE SOILS CAN BE USED TO REPLACE THE MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS OF LAYER 'C' OR 'D' AT THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER'S DISCRETION. NOTES: 1. CHAMBERS SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM F2418-16a, "STANDARD SPECIFICATION FOR POLYPROPYLENE (PP) CORRUGATED WALL STORMWATER COLLECTION CHAMBERS". 2. SC-740 CHAMBERS SHALL BE DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM F2787 "STANDARD PRACTICE FOR STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF THERMOPLASTIC CORRUGATED WALL STORMWATER COLLECTION CHAMBERS". 3. THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ASSESSING THE BEARING RESISTANCE (ALLOWABLE BEARING CAPACITY) OF THE SUBGRADE SOILS AND THE DEPTH OF FOUNDATION STONE WITH CONSIDERATION FOR THE RANGE OF EXPECTED SOIL MOISTURE CONDITIONS. 4. PERIMETER STONE MUST BE EXTENDED HORIZONTALLY TO THE EXCAVATION WALL FOR BOTH VERTICAL AND SLOPED EXCAVATION WALLS. 5. REQUIREMENTS FOR HANDLING AND INSTALLATION: ·TO MAINTAIN THE WIDTH OF CHAMBERS DURING SHIPPING AND HANDLING, CHAMBERS SHALL HAVE INTEGRAL, INTERLOCKING STACKING LUGS. ·TO ENSURE A SECURE JOINT DURING INSTALLATION AND BACKFILL, THE HEIGHT OF THE CHAMBER JOINT SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN 2”. ·TO ENSURE THE INTEGRITY OF THE ARCH SHAPE DURING INSTALLATION, a) THE ARCH STIFFNESS CONSTANT AS DEFINED IN SECTION 6.2.8 OF ASTM F2418 SHALL BE GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO 550 LBS/IN/IN. AND b) TO RESIST CHAMBER DEFORMATION DURING INSTALLATION AT ELEVATED TEMPERATURES (ABOVE 73° F / 23° C), CHAMBERS SHALL BE PRODUCED FROM REFLECTIVE GOLD OR YELLOW COLORS. MATERIAL LOCATION DESCRIPTION AASHTO MATERIAL CLASSIFICATIONS COMPACTION / DENSITY REQUIREMENT D FINAL FILL: FILL MATERIAL FOR LAYER 'D' STARTS FROM THE TOP OF THE 'C' LAYER TO THE BOTTOM OF FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT OR UNPAVED FINISHED GRADE ABOVE. NOTE THAT PAVEMENT SUBBASE MAY BE PART OF THE 'D' LAYER. ANY SOIL/ROCK MATERIALS, NATIVE SOILS, OR PER ENGINEER'S PLANS. CHECK PLANS FOR PAVEMENT SUBGRADE REQUIREMENTS.N/A PREPARE PER SITE DESIGN ENGINEER'S PLANS. PAVED INSTALLATIONS MAY HAVE STRINGENT MATERIAL AND PREPARATION REQUIREMENTS. C INITIAL FILL: FILL MATERIAL FOR LAYER 'C' STARTS FROM THE TOP OF THE EMBEDMENT STONE ('B' LAYER) TO 18" (450 mm) ABOVE THE TOP OF THE CHAMBER. NOTE THAT PAVEMENT SUBBASE MAY BE A PART OF THE 'C' LAYER. GRANULAR WELL-GRADED SOIL/AGGREGATE MIXTURES, <35% FINES OR PROCESSED AGGREGATE. MOST PAVEMENT SUBBASE MATERIALS CAN BE USED IN LIEU OF THIS LAYER. AASHTO M145¹ A-1, A-2-4, A-3 OR AASHTO M43¹ 3, 357, 4, 467, 5, 56, 57, 6, 67, 68, 7, 78, 8, 89, 9, 10 BEGIN COMPACTIONS AFTER 12" (300 mm) OF MATERIAL OVER THE CHAMBERS IS REACHED. COMPACT ADDITIONAL LAYERS IN 6" (150 mm) MAX LIFTS TO A MIN. 95% PROCTOR DENSITY FOR WELL GRADED MATERIAL AND 95% RELATIVE DENSITY FOR PROCESSED AGGREGATE MATERIALS. ROLLER GROSS VEHICLE WEIGHT NOT TO EXCEED 12,000 lbs (53 kN). DYNAMIC FORCE NOT TO EXCEED 20,000 lbs (89 kN). B EMBEDMENT STONE: FILL SURROUNDING THE CHAMBERS FROM THE FOUNDATION STONE ('A' LAYER) TO THE 'C' LAYER ABOVE. CLEAN, CRUSHED, ANGULAR STONE AASHTO M43¹ 3, 357, 4, 467, 5, 56, 57 NO COMPACTION REQUIRED. A FOUNDATION STONE: FILL BELOW CHAMBERS FROM THE SUBGRADE UP TO THE FOOT (BOTTOM) OF THE CHAMBER.CLEAN, CRUSHED, ANGULAR STONE AASHTO M43¹ 3, 357, 4, 467, 5, 56, 57 PLATE COMPACT OR ROLL TO ACHIEVE A FLAT SURFACE.2,3 18" (450 mm) MIN* 8' (2.4 m) MAX6" (150 mm) MIN D C B A 12" (300 mm) MIN ADS GEOSYNTHETICS 601T NON-WOVEN GEOTEXTILE ALL AROUND CLEAN, CRUSHED, ANGULAR STONE IN A & B LAYERS 12" (300 mm) MIN51" (1295 mm)6" (150 mm) MIN 30" (762 mm) DEPTH OF STONE TO BE DETERMINED BY SITE DESIGN ENGINEER 6" (150 mm) MIN *TO BOTTOM OF FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT. FOR UNPAVEDINSTALLATIONS WHERE RUTTING FROM VEHICLES MAY OCCUR,INCREASE COVER TO 24" (600 mm). EXCAVATION WALL (CAN BE SLOPED OR VERTICAL) PERIMETER STONE (SEE NOTE 4) SC-740 END CAP SUBGRADE SOILS (SEE NOTE 3) PAVEMENT LAYER (DESIGNED BY SITE DESIGN ENGINEER) **THIS CROSS SECTION DETAIL REPRESENTS MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR INSTALLATION. PLEASE SEE THE LAYOUT SHEET(S) FOR PROJECT SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS.520 CROMWELL AVENUE | ROCKY HILL | CT | 06067860-529-8188 |888-892-2694 | WWW.STORMTECH.COMDetention Retention Water Quality SHEET OFDATE:PROJECT #:DRAWN:CHECKED:THIS DRAWING HAS BEEN PREPARED BASED ON INFORMATION PROVIDED TO ADS UNDER THE DIRECTION OF THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER OR OTHER PROJECT REPRESENTATIVE. THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER SHALL REVIEW THIS DRAWING PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. IT IS THE ULTIMATERESPONSIBILITY OF THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER TO ENSURE THAT THE PRODUCT(S) DEPICTED AND ALL ASSOCIATED DETAILS MEET ALL APPLICABLE LAWS, REGULATIONS, AND PROJECT REQUIREMENTS.4640 TRUEMAN BLVDHILLIARD, OH 43026ADVANCED DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, INC.R10 125-21-20S184604SMACKMSMEADOWBROOK ELEMENTARY SCHOOLGOLDEN VALLEY, MNDATE DRWN CHKDDESCRIPTION06-10-2020 NSL CJDREVISED PER COMMENTS06-25-2020 NSL CJD REVISED PER UPDATED DESIGN GUIDANCE07-25-2020 NSL CJDREVISED PER ENGINEER COMMENTS09-19-2020 NSL CJDREVISED PER ENGINEER COMMENTS10-05-20 NSL CJDREVISED PER ENGINEER COMMENTS520 CROMWELL AVENUE | ROCKY HILL | CT | 06067860-529-8188 |888-892-2694 | WWW.STORMTECH.COMDetention Retention Water QualityINSPECTION & MAINTENANCE STEP 1) INSPECT ISOLATOR ROW FOR SEDIMENT A. INSPECTION PORTS (IF PRESENT) A.1. REMOVE/OPEN LID ON NYLOPLAST INLINE DRAIN A.2. REMOVE AND CLEAN FLEXSTORM FILTER IF INSTALLED A.3. USING A FLASHLIGHT AND STADIA ROD, MEASURE DEPTH OF SEDIMENT AND RECORD ON MAINTENANCE LOG A.4. LOWER A CAMERA INTO ISOLATOR ROW FOR VISUAL INSPECTION OF SEDIMENT LEVELS (OPTIONAL) A.5. IF SEDIMENT IS AT, OR ABOVE, 3" (80 mm) PROCEED TO STEP 2. IF NOT, PROCEED TO STEP 3. B. ALL ISOLATOR ROWS B.1. REMOVE COVER FROM STRUCTURE AT UPSTREAM END OF ISOLATOR ROW B.2. USING A FLASHLIGHT, INSPECT DOWN THE ISOLATOR ROW THROUGH OUTLET PIPE i) MIRRORS ON POLES OR CAMERAS MAY BE USED TO AVOID A CONFINED SPACE ENTRY ii) FOLLOW OSHA REGULATIONS FOR CONFINED SPACE ENTRY IF ENTERING MANHOLE B.3. IF SEDIMENT IS AT, OR ABOVE, 3" (80 mm) PROCEED TO STEP 2. IF NOT, PROCEED TO STEP 3. STEP 2) CLEAN OUT ISOLATOR ROW USING THE JETVAC PROCESS A. A FIXED CULVERT CLEANING NOZZLE WITH REAR FACING SPREAD OF 45" (1.1 m) OR MORE IS PREFERRED B. APPLY MULTIPLE PASSES OF JETVAC UNTIL BACKFLUSH WATER IS CLEAN C. VACUUM STRUCTURE SUMP AS REQUIRED STEP 3) REPLACE ALL COVERS, GRATES, FILTERS, AND LIDS; RECORD OBSERVATIONS AND ACTIONS. STEP 4) INSPECT AND CLEAN BASINS AND MANHOLES UPSTREAM OF THE STORMTECH SYSTEM. NOTES 1. INSPECT EVERY 6 MONTHS DURING THE FIRST YEAR OF OPERATION. ADJUST THE INSPECTION INTERVAL BASED ON PREVIOUS OBSERVATIONS OF SEDIMENT ACCUMULATION AND HIGH WATER ELEVATIONS. 2. CONDUCT JETTING AND VACTORING ANNUALLY OR WHEN INSPECTION SHOWS THAT MAINTENANCE IS NECESSARY. SUMP DEPTH TBD BY SITE DESIGN ENGINEER (24" [600 mm] MIN RECOMMENDED) CATCH BASIN OR MANHOLE SC-310 ISOLATOR ROW DETAIL NTS OPTIONAL INSPECTION PORT SC-310 END CAP COVER ENTIRE ISOLATOR ROW WITH ADS GEOSYNTHETICS 601T NON-WOVEN GEOTEXTILE 5' (1.5 m) MIN WIDE SC-310 CHAMBERSTORMTECH HIGHLY RECOMMENDS FLEXSTORM PURE INSERTS IN ANY UPSTREAM STRUCTURES WITH OPEN GRATES 12" (300 mm) HDPE ACCESS PIPE REQUIRED USE FACTORY PRE-FABRICATED END CAP PART #: SC310EPE12B TWO LAYERS OF ADS GEOSYNTHETICS 315WTK WOVEN GEOTEXTILE BETWEEN FOUNDATION STONE AND CHAMBERS 4' (1.2 m) MIN WIDE CONTINUOUS FABRIC WITHOUT SEAMS ELEVATED BYPASS MANIFOLD UNDERDRAIN DETAIL NTS A A B B SECTION A-A SECTION B-B NUMBER AND SIZE OF UNDERDRAINS PER SITE DESIGN ENGINEER 4" (100 mm) TYP FOR SC-310 & SC-160LP SYSTEMS 6" (150 mm) TYP FOR SC-740, DC-780, MC-3500 & MC-4500 SYSTEMS OUTLET MANIFOLD STORMTECH END CAP STORMTECH CHAMBERS STORMTECH CHAMBER STORMTECH END CAP DUAL WALL PERFORATED HDPE UNDERDRAIN ADS GEOSYNTHETICS 601T NON-WOVEN GEOTEXTILE ADS GEOSYNTHETICS 601T NON-WOVEN GEOTEXTILE FOUNDATION STONE BENEATH CHAMBERS FOUNDATION STONE BENEATH CHAMBERS SHEET OFDATE:PROJECT #:DRAWN:CHECKED:THIS DRAWING HAS BEEN PREPARED BASED ON INFORMATION PROVIDED TO ADS UNDER THE DIRECTION OF THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER OR OTHER PROJECT REPRESENTATIVE. THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER SHALL REVIEW THIS DRAWING PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. IT IS THE ULTIMATERESPONSIBILITY OF THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER TO ENSURE THAT THE PRODUCT(S) DEPICTED AND ALL ASSOCIATED DETAILS MEET ALL APPLICABLE LAWS, REGULATIONS, AND PROJECT REQUIREMENTS.4640 TRUEMAN BLVDHILLIARD, OH 43026ADVANCED DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, INC.R11 125-21-20S184604SMACKMSMEADOWBROOK ELEMENTARY SCHOOLGOLDEN VALLEY, MNDATE DRWN CHKDDESCRIPTION06-10-2020 NSL CJDREVISED PER COMMENTS06-25-2020 NSL CJD REVISED PER UPDATED DESIGN GUIDANCE07-25-2020 NSL CJDREVISED PER ENGINEER COMMENTS09-19-2020 NSL CJDREVISED PER ENGINEER COMMENTS10-05-20 NSL CJDREVISED PER ENGINEER COMMENTSINSPECTION & MAINTENANCE STEP 1) INSPECT ISOLATOR ROW FOR SEDIMENT A. INSPECTION PORTS (IF PRESENT) A.1. REMOVE/OPEN LID ON NYLOPLAST INLINE DRAIN A.2. REMOVE AND CLEAN FLEXSTORM FILTER IF INSTALLED A.3. USING A FLASHLIGHT AND STADIA ROD, MEASURE DEPTH OF SEDIMENT AND RECORD ON MAINTENANCE LOG A.4. LOWER A CAMERA INTO ISOLATOR ROW FOR VISUAL INSPECTION OF SEDIMENT LEVELS (OPTIONAL) A.5. IF SEDIMENT IS AT, OR ABOVE, 3" (80 mm) PROCEED TO STEP 2. IF NOT, PROCEED TO STEP 3. B. ALL ISOLATOR ROWS B.1. REMOVE COVER FROM STRUCTURE AT UPSTREAM END OF ISOLATOR ROW B.2. USING A FLASHLIGHT, INSPECT DOWN THE ISOLATOR ROW THROUGH OUTLET PIPE i) MIRRORS ON POLES OR CAMERAS MAY BE USED TO AVOID A CONFINED SPACE ENTRY ii) FOLLOW OSHA REGULATIONS FOR CONFINED SPACE ENTRY IF ENTERING MANHOLE B.3. IF SEDIMENT IS AT, OR ABOVE, 3" (80 mm) PROCEED TO STEP 2. IF NOT, PROCEED TO STEP 3. STEP 2) CLEAN OUT ISOLATOR ROW USING THE JETVAC PROCESS A. A FIXED CULVERT CLEANING NOZZLE WITH REAR FACING SPREAD OF 45" (1.1 m) OR MORE IS PREFERRED B. APPLY MULTIPLE PASSES OF JETVAC UNTIL BACKFLUSH WATER IS CLEAN C. VACUUM STRUCTURE SUMP AS REQUIRED STEP 3) REPLACE ALL COVERS, GRATES, FILTERS, AND LIDS; RECORD OBSERVATIONS AND ACTIONS. STEP 4) INSPECT AND CLEAN BASINS AND MANHOLES UPSTREAM OF THE STORMTECH SYSTEM. NOTES 1. INSPECT EVERY 6 MONTHS DURING THE FIRST YEAR OF OPERATION. ADJUST THE INSPECTION INTERVAL BASED ON PREVIOUS OBSERVATIONS OF SEDIMENT ACCUMULATION AND HIGH WATER ELEVATIONS. 2. CONDUCT JETTING AND VACTORING ANNUALLY OR WHEN INSPECTION SHOWS THAT MAINTENANCE IS NECESSARY. SUMP DEPTH TBD BY SITE DESIGN ENGINEER (24" [600 mm] MIN RECOMMENDED) CATCH BASIN OR MANHOLE SC-740 ISOLATOR ROW DETAIL NTS SC-740 END CAP OPTIONAL INSPECTION PORT SC-740 CHAMBER COVER ENTIRE ISOLATOR ROW WITH ADS GEOSYNTHETICS 601T NON-WOVEN GEOTEXTILE 8' (2.4 m) MIN WIDE STORMTECH HIGHLY RECOMMENDS FLEXSTORM PURE INSERTS IN ANY UPSTREAM STRUCTURES WITH OPEN GRATES 24" (600 mm) HDPE ACCESS PIPE REQUIRED USE FACTORY PRE-FABRICATED END CAP PART #: SC740EPE24B TWO LAYERS OF ADS GEOSYNTHETICS 315WTK WOVEN GEOTEXTILE BETWEEN FOUNDATION STONE AND CHAMBERS 5' (1.5 m) MIN WIDE CONTINUOUS FABRIC WITHOUT SEAMS ELEVATED BYPASS MANIFOLD 520 CROMWELL AVENUE | ROCKY HILL | CT | 06067860-529-8188 |888-892-2694 | WWW.STORMTECH.COMDetention Retention Water Quality SHEET OFDATE:PROJECT #:DRAWN:CHECKED:THIS DRAWING HAS BEEN PREPARED BASED ON INFORMATION PROVIDED TO ADS UNDER THE DIRECTION OF THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER OR OTHER PROJECT REPRESENTATIVE. THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER SHALL REVIEW THIS DRAWING PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. IT IS THE ULTIMATERESPONSIBILITY OF THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER TO ENSURE THAT THE PRODUCT(S) DEPICTED AND ALL ASSOCIATED DETAILS MEET ALL APPLICABLE LAWS, REGULATIONS, AND PROJECT REQUIREMENTS.4640 TRUEMAN BLVDHILLIARD, OH 43026ADVANCED DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, INC.R12 125-21-20S184604SMACKMSMEADOWBROOK ELEMENTARY SCHOOLGOLDEN VALLEY, MNDATE DRWN CHKDDESCRIPTION06-10-2020 NSL CJDREVISED PER COMMENTS06-25-2020 NSL CJD REVISED PER UPDATED DESIGN GUIDANCE07-25-2020 NSL CJDREVISED PER ENGINEER COMMENTS09-19-2020 NSL CJDREVISED PER ENGINEER COMMENTS10-05-20 NSL CJDREVISED PER ENGINEER COMMENTS520 CROMWELL AVENUE | ROCKY HILL | CT | 06067860-529-8188 |888-892-2694 | WWW.STORMTECH.COMDetention Retention Water QualityPART #STUB A B C SC310EPE06T / SC310EPE06TPC 6" (150 mm) 9.6" (244 mm) 5.8" (147 mm)--- SC310EPE06B / SC310EPE06BPC ---0.5" (13 mm) SC310EPE08T / SC310EPE08TPC 8" (200 mm) 11.9" (302 mm) 3.5" (89 mm)--- SC310EPE08B / SC310EPE08BPC ---0.6" (15 mm) SC310EPE10T / SC310EPE10TPC 10" (250 mm) 12.7" (323 mm) 1.4" (36 mm)--- SC310EPE10B / SC310EPE10BPC ---0.7" (18 mm) SC310EPE12B 12" (300 mm) 13.5" (343 mm)---0.9" (23 mm) ALL STUBS, EXCEPT FOR THE SC310EPE12B ARE PLACED AT BOTTOM OF END CAP SUCH THAT THE OUTSIDE DIAMETER OF THE STUB IS FLUSH WITH THE BOTTOM OF THE END CAP. FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CONTACT STORMTECH AT 1-888-892-2694. * FOR THE SC310EPE12B THE 12" (300 mm) STUB LIES BELOW THE BOTTOM OF THE END CAP APPROXIMATELY 0.25" (6 mm). BACKFILL MATERIAL SHOULD BE REMOVED FROM BELOW THE N-12 STUB SO THAT THE FITTING SITS LEVEL. NOTE: ALL DIMENSIONS ARE NOMINAL NOMINAL CHAMBER SPECIFICATIONS SIZE (W X H X INSTALLED LENGTH)34.0" X 16.0" X 85.4" (864 mm X 406 mm X 2169 mm) CHAMBER STORAGE 14.7 CUBIC FEET (0.42 m³) MINIMUM INSTALLED STORAGE*31.0 CUBIC FEET (0.88 m³) WEIGHT 35.0 lbs.(16.8 kg) *ASSUMES 6" (152 mm) ABOVE, BELOW, AND BETWEEN CHAMBERS PRE-FAB STUBS AT BOTTOM OF END CAP FOR PART NUMBERS ENDING WITH "B" PRE-FAB STUBS AT TOP OF END CAP FOR PART NUMBERS ENDING WITH "T" PRE CORED END CAPS END WITH "PC" 34.0" (864 mm) 16.0" (406 mm) 90.7" (2304 mm) ACTUAL LENGTH 85.4" (2169 mm) INSTALLED LENGTH BUILD ROW IN THIS DIRECTION A A B C SC-310 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION NTS 9.9" (251 mm) 15.6" (396 mm) OVERLAP NEXT CHAMBER HERE (OVER SMALL CORRUGATION) START END PART #STUB A B C SC740EPE06T / SC740EPE06TPC 6" (150 mm) 10.9" (277 mm) 18.5" (470 mm)--- SC740EPE06B / SC740EPE06BPC ---0.5" (13 mm) SC740EPE08T /SC740EPE08TPC 8" (200 mm) 12.2" (310 mm) 16.5" (419 mm)--- SC740EPE08B / SC740EPE08BPC ---0.6" (15 mm) SC740EPE10T / SC740EPE10TPC 10" (250 mm) 13.4" (340 mm) 14.5" (368 mm)--- SC740EPE10B / SC740EPE10BPC ---0.7" (18 mm) SC740EPE12T / SC740EPE12TPC 12" (300 mm) 14.7" (373 mm) 12.5" (318 mm)--- SC740EPE12B / SC740EPE12BPC ---1.2" (30 mm) SC740EPE15T / SC740EPE15TPC 15" (375 mm) 18.4" (467 mm) 9.0" (229 mm)--- SC740EPE15B / SC740EPE15BPC ---1.3" (33 mm) SC740EPE18T / SC740EPE18TPC 18" (450 mm) 19.7" (500 mm) 5.0" (127 mm)--- SC740EPE18B / SC740EPE18BPC ---1.6" (41 mm) SC740EPE24B*24" (600 mm) 18.5" (470 mm)---0.1" (3 mm) ALL STUBS, EXCEPT FOR THE SC740EPE24B ARE PLACED AT BOTTOM OF END CAP SUCH THAT THE OUTSIDE DIAMETER OF THE STUB IS FLUSH WITH THE BOTTOM OF THE END CAP. FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CONTACT STORMTECH AT 1-888-892-2694. * FOR THE SC740EPE24B THE 24" (600 mm) STUB LIES BELOW THE BOTTOM OF THE END CAP APPROXIMATELY 1.75" (44 mm). BACKFILL MATERIAL SHOULD BE REMOVED FROM BELOW THE N-12 STUB SO THAT THE FITTING SITS LEVEL. NOTE: ALL DIMENSIONS ARE NOMINAL NOMINAL CHAMBER SPECIFICATIONS SIZE (W X H X INSTALLED LENGTH)51.0" X 30.0" X 85.4" (1295 mm X 762 mm X 2169 mm) CHAMBER STORAGE 45.9 CUBIC FEET (1.30 m³) MINIMUM INSTALLED STORAGE*74.9 CUBIC FEET (2.12 m³) WEIGHT 75.0 lbs.(33.6 kg) *ASSUMES 6" (152 mm) STONE ABOVE, BELOW, AND BETWEEN CHAMBERS PRE-FAB STUBS AT BOTTOM OF END CAP FOR PART NUMBERS ENDING WITH "B" PRE-FAB STUBS AT TOP OF END CAP FOR PART NUMBERS ENDING WITH "T" PRE-CORED END CAPS END WITH "PC" SC-740 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION NTS 90.7" (2304 mm) ACTUAL LENGTH 85.4" (2169 mm) INSTALLED LENGTH BUILD ROW IN THIS DIRECTION A A C B 51.0" (1295 mm) 30.0" (762 mm) 45.9" (1166 mm)12.2" (310 mm) 29.3" (744 mm) OVERLAP NEXT CHAMBER HERE (OVER SMALL CORRUGATION) START END PROJECT SUMMARYNot to be reproduced in whole or part without the written consent of Musco Sports Lighting, LLC. ©1981, 2021 Musco Sports Lighting, LLC.ENGINEERED DESIGNNOTEPole Height is 22' with 3' Bases. Mounting Height is at 25'.Meadowbrook Elementary School Parking LotHopkins, MN USALighng System Pole / Fixture SummaryPole IDPole HeightMtg HeightFixture QtyLuminaire TypeLoadCircuitM1-M3--25'2CREE OSQ0.26 kWAP1-P4, P6-P7,P9-P1422'22'2CREE OSQ0.26 kWAP522'22'3CREE OSQ0.39 kWAP822'22'1CREE OSQ0.13 kWA17344.42 kW Circuit SummaryCircuitDescriptionLoadFixture QtyAParking4.42 kW34 Fixture Type SummaryTypeSourceWattageLumensL90L80L70QuantityCREE OSQLED 5700K - 70 CRI130W16,599------34Light Level Summary Calculation Grid SummaryIlluminationGrid NameCalculation MetricAveMinMaxMax/MinAve/MinCircuitsFixture QtyGridHorizontal Illuminance0000.00A34Parking LotHorizontal6.822178.353.41A34 ILLUMINATION SUMMARYNot to be reproduced in whole or part without the written consent of Musco Sports Lighting, LLC. ©1981, 2021 Musco Sports Lighting, LLC.ENGINEERED DESIGN223 7 7 114 54 4 6 8 10 7 5 44 5 107 6 75 9 5 4 4 4 4 5 7 106 7 86 4 3 3 3 4 5 86 9 112 3 57 8 74 4 54 42 3 343 49 10 5 5 4 56 711 8 6 6 6 56 10 1013 10 7 7 6 77 1011 12 10 8 7 87 10 1112 11 12 11 9 11 1011 1013 12 9 8 7 87 614 10 7 6 53 4 714 10 6 5 43 5 812 11 6 5 54 7 9 12 10 9 7 5 5 84 5 6 5 4 5 5 7 11 11 10 104 3 3 3 5 6 6 7 8 12 11 83 3 4 4 5 5 6 10 13 97 6 6 4 3 4 5 6 9 12 1110 8 5 3 2 3 3 5 9 12 11 12 12 1510 8 6 4 3 2 2 3 6 7 7 9 111716 13118 6 5 3 2 2 3 4 6 7 7 8 11 10 9 10 9 11 69 9 5 5 3 2 2 3 4 7 8 7 7 8 8 7 8 10 8 7 45 7 10 7 4 3 2 2 3 5 6 11 9 9 7 657 10 7 4 3 2 3 4 5 7 11 9 9 7 49 9 6 5 3 3 3 5 6 8 10 11 8 511 8 6 5 4 4 4 6 8 11 1111 8 6 6 5 5 6 9 9 8 811 8 7 6 5 6 9 6 58 8 6 7 8 10 78 10 9 108 910 9 107 6 74 4 53 4 43 3 3 34 4 46 5 510 7 7 8 510 10 8 4P1P2P4P5P6P7P9P10P11P12P13P3P8M2M3M1P14SCALE IN FEET 1 : 800'80'160'EQUIPMENT LIST FOR AREAS SHOWNPoleLuminairesQTYLOCATIONSIZEGRADEELEVATIONMOUNTINGHEIGHTLUMINAIRETYPEQTY /POLETHISGRIDOTHERGRIDS3M1-M325'25'CREE OSQ22012P1-P4P6-P7P9-P1422'3'25'CREE OSQ2201P522'3'25'CREE OSQ2/1*301P822'3'25'CREE OSQ11017TOTALS34340 * -- P 0,0 f pMeadowbrook Elementary School Parking LotHopkins, MN USAGRID SUMMARYName: Parking LotSp: 10.0' x 10.0'H: 3.0' ILLUMINATION SUMMARYMAINAINED HORIZONAL FOOCANDLESE Scan Average:6.82Mx: 17M: 2A / M: 3.31Max / Min:8.35U j p: 2.40CU: 0.46N. f P: 382LUMINAIRE INFORMAIONApp C: ANo. of Luminaires: 34 L: 4.42 WGuaranteed Performance: ILLUMINAION p y MWy 0.95 p f.Field Measurements:I y y fp- p w IESNA RP-6-15.Electrical System Requirements:Rf ApDw C / "Musco Control System Summary"f .Installaon Requirements:R ± 3% f w 3 f 1 f . ILLUMINATION SUMMARYNot to be reproduced in whole or part without the written consent of Musco Sports Lighting, LLC. ©1981, 2021 Musco Sports Lighting, LLC.ENGINEERED DESIGNy: S F 204066F 04--21P1P2P4P5P6P7P9P10P11P12P13P3P873'188'86'63'11'110'241'146'89'50'47'12'101'19'178'69'217'22'175'75'103'19'31'18'88'99'27'152'142'172'27'72'144'52'M2M3M1P14SCALE IN FEET 1 : 800'80'160'EQUIPMENT LIST FOR AREAS SHOWNPoleLuminairesQTYLOCATIONSIZEGRADEELEVATIONMOUNTINGHEIGHTLUMINAIRETYPEQTY /POLETHISGRIDOTHERGRIDS3M1-M325'25'CREE OSQ22012P1-P4P6-P7P9-P1422'3'25'CREE OSQ2201P522'3'25'CREE OSQ2/1*301P822'3'25'CREE OSQ11017TOTALS343400,0fpMeadowbrook Elementary School Parking LotHopkins, MN USAGRID SUMMARYName: GridSp: 10.0'x10.0'H: 3.0'ILLUMINATION SUMMARYMAINAINEDHORIZONALFOOCANDLESEScan Average:0.00Mx: 0M: 0A/M: 0.00Max / Min:-Ujp: 0.00N.f: 0LUMINAIREINFORMAIONAppC: ANo. of Luminaires: 34L: 4.42WGuaranteed Performance:ILLUMINAIONpyMWy0.95pf.Field Measurements:IyyfppwIESNAR615.Electrical System Requirements:RfApDwC/"Musco Control System Summary"f.Installaon Requirements:R±3%fw3f1f. EQUIPMENT LAYOUTNot to be reproduced in whole or part without the written consent of Musco Sports Lighting, LLC. ©1981, 2021 Musco Sports Lighting, LLC.ENGINEERED DESIGNy:SF204066F0421P1P2P4P5P6P7P9P10P11P12P13P3P8M2M3M1P14SCALE IN FEET 1 : 1000'100'200'0,0fpMeadowbrook Elementary School Parking LotHopkins, MN USAEQUIPMENT LAYOUTINCLUDES:Electrical System Requirements:RfApDwC/"Musco Control System Summary"f.Installaon Requirements:R±3%fw3f1f.EQUIPMENT LIST FOR AREAS SHOWNPoleLuminairesQTYLOCATIONSIZEGRADEELEVATIONMOUNTINGHEIGHTLUMINAIRETYPEQTY /POLE3M1-M325'25'CREE OSQ212P1-P4P6-P7P9-P1422'3'25'CREE OSQ21P522'3'25'CREE OSQ2/1*1P822'3'25'CREE OSQ117TOTALS34SINGLE LUMINAIRE AMPERAGE DRAW CHART S(.90 m wr fr)L Amrg Pr Lumr(mx drw)SPV208(60)220(60)240(60)277(60)347(60)380(60)480(60)COSQ0.4 0.3 TRUNK HIGHWAY NO. 100GLENWOOD AVENUEPARCEL 3PROPOSED R/W EASEMENT VACATION(AREA SHOWN PER MNDOT DESCRIPTION)PROPOSED TRAILEASEMENT AREA #1PROPOSED R/W VACATIONPROPOSED R/W EASEMENT VACATIONPROPOSED TRAILEASEMENT AREA #2PROPOSED R/W (TO BEDEDICATED ON FUTURE PLAT)PROPOSED DRAINAGE ANDUTILITY EASEMENT AREAPARCEL 1PARCEL 2 PARCEL 4 PARCEL 5PARCEL 6PARCEL 7PARCEL 8PARCEL 8PID#1902924330007CONTACT:SAFEngineering, PLLCNeil Tessier, PE3200 122nd Avenue NEBlaine, MN 55449612-213-9859nrtessier@gmail.comLHB12013DSURVLHB13DPROPOSED R.O.W.SKETCHCOUNTY/CITY:PROJECT LOCATION:LAND SURVEYING, INC.CORNERSTONESuite #2001970 Northwestern AveStillwater, MN 55082Phone 651.275.8969Fax 651.275.8976dan@cssurvey.netPROJECT NO.FILE NAME5300CALL BEFORE YOU DIG!TWIN CITY AREA:TOLL FREE:1-800-252-1166651-454-0002Gopher State One CallGLENWOOD AVECITY OF GOLDEN VALLEYHENNEPINCOUNTYMEADOWBROOK0NORTH50 100ELEMENTARYSCHOOLPID#19029243300195400GLENWOOD AVEPID#33118213400545430GLENWOOD AVE Apr 15, 2021 - 11:51am - User:jworkman L:\PROJECTS\21672.01\CAD\Civil\Sheets\21672.01 - C1 - TITLE.dwg C1.01 TITLE DEVELOPER/OWNER INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 270 1001 HIGHWAY 7 HOPKINS, MN 55305 TEL 952-988-4000 FAX 952-988-4092 CONTACT: CIVIL ENGINEER SAFENGINEERING 3200 122ND AVENUE NE BLAINE, MN 55449 TEL 612-213-9859 CONTACT: NEIL TESSIER, PE. SURVEYOR CORNERSTONE LAND SURVEYING, INC. 6750 STILLWATER, BLVD. NORTH SUITE #1 STILLWATER, MN 55082 TEL 651-275-8969 FAX 651-275-8976 CONTACT: DAN THURMES SHEET INDEX SHEET DESCRIPTION C1.01 TITLE --SURVEY - 5430 GLENWOOD AVENUE --TREE INVENTORY --PROPOSED PLAT C2.02 DEMO PLAN - EAST PARKING LOT C3.01 SITE PLAN - EAST PARKING LOT C4.01 GRADING PLAN - EAST PARKING LOT C5.01 EROSION CONTROL PLAN - EAST PARKING LOT C5.02 SWPPP NARRATIVE C5.03 SWPPP NARRATIVE L1.01 LANDSCAPE PLAN - EAST PARKING LOT C9.01 DETAILS C9.02 DETAILS C9.03 DETAILS 12 OF 12 SUBSURFACE TREATMENT SYSTEM DETAILS ( ADS) 4 OF 4 SITE LIGHTING PLAN Meadowbrook Elementary School Parking Lot Improvements SAFEngineering Golden Valley, Minnesota Presented by: NO SCALE VICINITY MAP SITE CONSULTANT CONTACT LIST: N.T.S. Project Location Date Submittal / RevisionNo. Certification Sheet Title Summary Revision History Sheet No.Revision Project No. By Designed:Drawn: Approved:Book / Page: Phase:Initial Issue: ClientISD # 270 MEADOWBROOKELEMENTARYPARKING LOTIMPROVEMENTS GOLDENVALLEY, MN 5430 GLENWOOD AVE. NT JRW NT PRELIM.1/11/2021 21672.01 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SET OF PLANS ANDSPECIFICATIONS WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDERMY DIRECT SUPERVISION, AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. NEIL TESSIER, PE. DATE REGISTRATION NO. 2/22/2021 26364 SAFEngineering, PLLC Site and Athletic Facility Engineering 3200 122nd Ave. NEBlaine, MN 55449612-213-9859nrtessier@gmail.com 1 04/15/21 CITY REVIEW ISD #270 GLENWOOD AVENUE 394 55 100 ELECTRICAL MUSCO 20892 HARTFORD WAY LAKEVILLE, MN 55044 TEL 612-368-9286 CONTACT: SCOTT PEITZ NO PARKINGNO PARKINGPROPOSED R/W V A C A T I O N PROPOSED R/W E A S E M E N T V A C A T I O N PR O P O S E D D R A I N A G E A N D U T I L I T Y E A S E M E N T A R E AWE T L A N D TR U N K H I G H W A Y N O . 1 0 0 GLENWOOD AV E N U E LT LT PIVGM ELEC.BOX GASMETER GRAVELGRAVEL GRAVELGRAVE L GRAVEL 24'24'9'24'18.5'18.5'18.5'24'18.5' 30' SAW CUT LINE NEW CATCH BASIN NEW CATCH BASIN FLUME & 5 CY RIP RAP SAW CUT LINE 02G 04A FES & 10 CY RIP-RAP 04F SIGN 07A SIGN07H 04A 04B CURB & GUTTER01C CURB & GUTTER01C 03A CURB AND GUTTER01A 03A24'03A CURB & GUTTER01A HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE 02B 03A 03A CURB & GUTTER01A NEW 12" RCP @ 10' NEW 15" RCP @ 20' NEW 18" CMP @ 30' CONCRETESIDEWALK02A ADA RAMP ADA PARKINGSIGNS ONBUILDING CURB AND GUTTER01A 48.3'79.2'21.9'91.2'55.1'24'22.3'55.7'11'52'76'27.8' 55. 6 ' 5' NEW MANHOLE 18.5' 24' 18.5' 02C32'68.2'CURB & GUTTER01C MANHOLE04B CURB & GUTTER01A NEW FES WITH 10 CY RIPRAP04F CLEANOUT04J CLEANOUT04J 92'53'5' CURB & GUTTER01A MANHOLE04B CATCH BASIN04B MANHOLE04BMANHOLE04B 4" W x 6' LWHITE DASHED STRIPES 4" W x 6' LWHITE DASHED STRIPES 4" W SOLID YELLOWSTRIPE 13'13' MANHOLE04B16'28'15' 07B 07G07H 04B 4" W x 6' L WHITE DASHED STRIPES SIGN07A07G07H 07G 04B MANHOLE07E REMOVE AND RESETEXISTING CB CASTINGS04B CONTINUE STRIPES TO BUILDING 12'12'-87B -87B -87B -87B -87B -87B -87B -87B -87B -87B -87B -87B -87B -87B Project Location Date Submittal / RevisionNo. Certification Sheet Title Summary Revision History Sheet No.Revision Project No. By Designed:Drawn: Approved:Book / Page: Phase:Initial Issue: ClientISD # 270 MEADOWBROOKELEMENTARYPARKING LOTIMPROVEMENTS GOLDENVALLEY, MN 5430 GLENWOOD AVE. NT JRW NT PRELIM.1/11/2021 21672.01 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SET OF PLANS ANDSPECIFICATIONS WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDERMY DIRECT SUPERVISION, AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. NEIL TESSIER, PE. DATE REGISTRATION NO. 2/22/2021 26364 SAFEngineering, PLLC Site and Athletic Facility Engineering 3200 122nd Ave. NEBlaine, MN 55449612-213-9859nrtessier@gmail.com 1 04/15/21 CITY REVIEW LEGEND EASEMENT CURB & GUTTER BUILDING RETAINING WALL CHAINLINK FENCE NUMBER OF PARKING STALLS PER ROW SIGN PIPE BOLLARD STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVING HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT PAVING CONCRETE PAVING PROPERTY LIMIT EXISTINGPROPOSED KEY NOTE WETLAND LIMITS TREELINE XX XX 0 NORTH SCALE IN FEET 30 60 Apr 15, 2021 - 11:51am - User:jworkman L:\PROJECTS\21672.01\CAD\Civil\Sheets\21672.01 - C3 - SITE.dwg C3.01 SITE PLAN -EAST PARKINGLOT DETAIL XX 04F FLARED END SECTION WITH RIP-RAP DETAIL KEYNOTES 02G FLUME 01A D312 CURB AND GUTTER 03A STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVING 07A SIGN POST 04B MANHOLE CATCH BASIN 02A CONCRETE SIDEWALK 02B HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE 02C ADA ACCESSIBLE RAMP 01C B612 CURB AND GUTTER 04J CLEAN OUT LIGHT POLE 04A CURB CATCH BASIN 07E ADA SYMBOL 07H DO NOT ENTER SIGN 07B ADA SIGNS 07G STOP SIGN 87B LIGHT POLE MAINTENANCE STRIP 1 1 1 857.9 861860859858858858858 857 856 855 854853852 8 6 4 86386 2 8 61 8 60 85985 9 858 857 856 857.3 858.3 858.2 858.2 858.1858.2 858.0 857.6 857.9 857.6 857.9 857.9 858.3 858.4 858.2858.8 859 859.9 86 0 860.7 857.0 856.5 859861862863864865866867868856.8 856.8860857.4 859860PROPOSED R/W V A C A T I O N PROPOSED R/W E A S E M E N T V A C A T I O N PR O P O S E D D R A I N A G E A N D U T I L I T Y E A S E M E N T A R E A851 CB 02 RE=857.00 IE=853.20 (E) SUMP=851.2 39 LF - 12" SCH 40 PVC @ 0.72% 18 LF - 15" RCP CONNECT TO EXISTING 853.50* *(FIELD VERIFY) 41 LF - 12" SCH40 PVC @ 0.5% CB 03 RE=855.50 IE=853.05 SW SUMP=851.05 5 LF - 15" SCH 40PVC @ 1.2% MH 09RE=868.00 IE=864.90 (SE) IE=862.00 (NW) 12 LF - 12"RCP @ 1.00% 40 LF - 18" CMP @ 3.8% MH 04RE=858.25 IE=853.13 (W) IE=852.92 (N) MH 03 RE=858.00 IE=853.13 NEIE=852.92 NWIE=852.92 W 10 LF - 15" SCH 40 PVC @ 1.0%FES 01 IE=850.00 FES 02IE=855.00 FIELD VERIFY CB 01 RE=856.80 IE=854.20 (SE) IE=854.15 (NW) SUMP=852.15 61 LF - 12"SCH40PVC @ 13.2% MH 05RE=857.70IE=853.75 MH 07RE=857.75IE=853.75 SEIE=853.75 EIE=853.75 N MH 06RE=857.80IE=853.75 MH 08RE=857.60IE=853.75 W IE=853.75 S IE=853.75 N MH 02 RE=856.00 IE=853.50 (W) IE=853.13 (SW) IE=852.92 (S)MH 01 RE=856.35 IE=853.13 (E) IE=852.92 (S) IE=852.40 (N) 30 LF - 15" SCH 40 PVC @ 7.3% PIPE01 - 15" OUTIE=852.20 PIPE04 - 15" INIE=852.34 PIPE03 - 12" OUT IE=853.87 PIPE02 - 15" INIE=852.98 12 LF - 15" SCH 40PVC @ 0.3% 9 LF - 12" PVC @ 3.78% PIPE07 - 12" INIE=853.80 PIPE06 - 15" OUTIE=853.70 PIPE05 - 15" IN IE=853.55 PIPE08 - 12" OUTIE=855.47 10' WIDE VEGETATED GRASS SWALE TODISSIPATE STORMWATER FLOW. SCALE IN FEET 0 6030 NORTH Apr 15, 2021 - 11:51am - User:jworkman L:\PROJECTS\21672.01\CAD\Civil\Sheets\21672.01 - C4 - GRAD.dwg C4.01 GRADING PLAN- EAST PARKINGLOT Project Location Date Submittal / RevisionNo. Certification Sheet Title Summary Revision History Sheet No.Revision Project No. By Designed:Drawn: Approved:Book / Page: Phase:Initial Issue: ClientISD # 270 MEADOWBROOKELEMENTARYPARKING LOTIMPROVEMENTS GOLDENVALLEY, MN 5430 GLENWOOD AVE. NT JRW NT PRELIM.1/11/2021 21672.01 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SET OF PLANS ANDSPECIFICATIONS WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDERMY DIRECT SUPERVISION, AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. NEIL TESSIER, PE. DATE REGISTRATION NO. 2/22/2021 26364 SAFEngineering, PLLC Site and Athletic Facility Engineering 3200 122nd Ave. NEBlaine, MN 55449612-213-9859nrtessier@gmail.com 1 04/15/21 CITY REVIEW 902.5X 902 SPOT ELEVATION CONTOUR RIP RAP OVERFLOW ELEV. CURB & GUTTER BUILDING RETAINING WALL PROPERTY LIMIT EXISTINGPROPOSED LEGEND WETLAND LIMITS TREELINE STORM SEWER SOIL BORINGS DRAINTILE EOF 902.5 D LIGHT POLE1 1 NO PARKINGNO PARKING861860859858858858858 857 856 855 854853852 8 6 4 863 86 2 86 1 8 60 85985 9 858 857 856 86 0 859861862863864865866867868860859860PROPOSED R/W V A C A T I O N PROPOSED R/W E A S E M E N T V A C A T I O N PR O P O S E D D R A I N A G E A N D U T I L I T Y E A S E M E N T A R E A851WE T L A N D TR U N K H I G H W A Y N O . 1 0 0 GLENWOOD AV E N U E LT LT PIVGM ELEC.BOX GASMETER GRAVELGRAVEL GRAVELGRAVE L GRAVEL Project Location Date Submittal / RevisionNo. Certification Sheet Title Summary Revision History Sheet No.Revision Project No. By Designed:Drawn: Approved:Book / Page: Phase:Initial Issue: ClientISD # 270 MEADOWBROOKELEMENTARYPARKING LOTIMPROVEMENTS GOLDENVALLEY, MN 5430 GLENWOOD AVE. NT JRW NT PRELIM.1/11/2021 21672.01 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SET OF PLANS ANDSPECIFICATIONS WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDERMY DIRECT SUPERVISION, AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. NEIL TESSIER, PE. DATE REGISTRATION NO. 2/22/2021 26364 SAFEngineering, PLLC Site and Athletic Facility Engineering 3200 122nd Ave. NEBlaine, MN 55449612-213-9859nrtessier@gmail.com 1 04/15/21 CITY REVIEW 0 NORTH SCALE IN FEET 30 60 Apr 15, 2021 - 11:51am - User:jworkman L:\PROJECTS\21672.01\CAD\Civil\Sheets\21672.01 - C5 - EROS.dwg C5.01 EROSIONCONTROL PLAN- EASTPARKING LOT DIRECTION OF OVERLAND FLOW TEMPORARY DIVERSION DITCH LIMITS OF DRAINAGE SUB-BASIN INLET PROTECTION DEVICE TEMPORARY STONE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE OVERFLOW ELEV. CONTOUR RIP RAP CHECK DAM SILT FENCE SOIL BORINGS EXISTINGPROPOSED STORM SEWER CURB & GUTTER DRAINTILE THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN SHEETS ALONG WITH THE REST OF THE SWPPP MUST BE KEPT ONSITE UNTIL THE NOTICE OF TERMINATION IS FILED WITH THE MPCA, THE CONTRACTOR MUST UPDATE THE SWPPP, INCLUDING THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN SHEETS AS NECESSARY TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS, SUCH AS ADDITIONAL OR MODIFIED BMPS DESIGNED TO CORRECT PROBLEMS IDENTIFIED. AFTER FILING THE NOTICE OF TERMINATION, THE SWPPP, INCLUDING THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN SHEETS, AND ALL REVISIONS TO IT MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE OWNER, TO BE KEPT ON FILE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RECORD RETENTION REQUIREMENTS DESCRIBED IN THE SWPPP NARRATIVE. SILT DIKE BIO-ROLL LEGEND NOTE TO CONTRACTOR EOF 902.5 D 902 IPX LIGHT POLE 1 NO PARKINGNO PARKING861860859858858858858 857 856 855 854853852 8 6 4 863 86 2 86 1 8 60 85985 9 858 857 856 86 0 859861862863864865866867868860859860PROPOSED R/W V A C A T I O N PROPOSED R/W E A S E M E N T V A C A T I O N PR O P O S E D D R A I N A G E A N D U T I L I T Y E A S E M E N T A R E A851WE T L A N D TR U N K H I G H W A Y N O . 1 0 0 GLENWOOD AV E N U E LT LT PIVGM ELEC.BOX GASMETER GRAVELGRAVEL GRAVELGRAVE L GRAVEL 5PSE 5HHR 3HAB 6CD 5PSE 5SJL 3WSL 3WSL 1AB 1AB AB1 WS3 LANDSCAPE EDGING 4IL 4IL 2IL 10' WIDE 32-261 SEED MIX. VEGETATED GRASS SWALE TO DISSIPATE STORMWATER FLOW. Project Location Date Submittal / RevisionNo. Certification Sheet Title Summary Revision History Sheet No.Revision Project No. By Designed:Drawn: Approved:Book / Page: Phase:Initial Issue: ClientISD # 270 MEADOWBROOKELEMENTARYPARKING LOTIMPROVEMENTS GOLDENVALLEY, MN 5430 GLENWOOD AVE. NT JRW NT PRELIM.1/11/2021 21672.01 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SET OF PLANS ANDSPECIFICATIONS WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDERMY DIRECT SUPERVISION, AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. NEIL TESSIER, PE. DATE REGISTRATION NO. 2/22/2021 26364 SAFEngineering, PLLC Site and Athletic Facility Engineering 3200 122nd Ave. NEBlaine, MN 55449612-213-9859nrtessier@gmail.com 1 04/15/21 CITY REVIEW LEGEND EASEMENT CURB & GUTTER BUILDING RETAINING WALL CHAINLINK FENCE SIGN PIPE BOLLARD STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVING HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT PAVING CONCRETE PAVING PROPERTY LIMIT EXISTINGPROPOSED WETLAND LIMITS TREELINE 0 NORTH SCALE IN FEET 30 60 Apr 15, 2021 - 11:51am - User:jworkman L:\PROJECTS\21672.01\CAD\Civil\Sheets\21672.01 - L1 - LSCP.dwg L1.01 LANDSCAPEPLAN - EASTPARKING LOT LANDSCAPE NOTES 1.ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO RECEIVE 4" OF TOPSOIL. 2.SEEDED AREAS TO BE COVERED WITH A NORTH AMERICAN GREEN SC 150 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET. 3.INSTALL PROFESSIONAL LANDSCAPE EDGING AS REQUIRED. 4.INSTALL 4" COCOA BROWN HARDWOOD MULCH FROM WEST METRO SUPPLY OVER NON-WOVEN SOIL SEPARATION FABRIC IN PLANTING BEDS. LIGHT POLE TREES CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT CAL SIZE QTY AB Acer freemanii `Autumn Blaze` / Autumn Blaze Maple B & B 2.5"Cal 3 WS Betula papyrifera `Whitespire` / Whitespire Birch B & B Clump 10`3 ORN. TREES CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT CAL SIZE QTY IL Syringa reticulata `Ivory Silk` / Ivory Silk Japanese Tree Lilac B & B 2"Cal 10 SHRUBS CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT QTY CD Cornus sericea `Alleman`s Compact` / Dwarf Red Twig Dogwood 5 gal 6 HAB Hydrangea arborescens `Abetwo` / Incrediball Hydrangea 5 gal 3 SJL Spiraea japonica `Little Princess` / Japanese Spirea 5 gal 5 WSL Weigela x `Slingco 1` TM / Crimson Kisses Weigela 2 gal.6 PERENNIALS CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT QTY HHR Hemerocallis x `Happy Returns` / Happy Returns Daylily 1 gal 5 PSE Phlox subulata `Emerald Blue` / Emerald Blue Creeping Phlox 1 gal 10 GROUND COVERS CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT 33-261 MNDOT Seed Mix 33-261 / Ponds and Wet Areas Seed TUR HIG Turf Sod Highland Sod / Sod Sod PLANT SCHEDULE - EAST PARKING LOT 1 1 Apr 15, 2021 - 11:51am - User:jworkman L:\PROJECTS\21672.01\CAD\Civil\Sheets\21672.01 - C1 - TITLE.dwg C1.01 TITLE DEVELOPER/OWNER INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 270 1001 HIGHWAY 7 HOPKINS, MN 55305 TEL 952-988-4000 FAX 952-988-4092 CONTACT: CIVIL ENGINEER SAFENGINEERING 3200 122ND AVENUE NE BLAINE, MN 55449 TEL 612-213-9859 CONTACT: NEIL TESSIER, PE. SURVEYOR CORNERSTONE LAND SURVEYING, INC. 6750 STILLWATER, BLVD. NORTH SUITE #1 STILLWATER, MN 55082 TEL 651-275-8969 FAX 651-275-8976 CONTACT: DAN THURMES SHEET INDEX SHEET DESCRIPTION C1.01 TITLE --SURVEY - 5430 GLENWOOD AVENUE --TREE INVENTORY --PROPOSED PLAT C2.02 DEMO PLAN - EAST PARKING LOT C3.01 SITE PLAN - EAST PARKING LOT C4.01 GRADING PLAN - EAST PARKING LOT C5.01 EROSION CONTROL PLAN - EAST PARKING LOT C5.02 SWPPP NARRATIVE C5.03 SWPPP NARRATIVE L1.01 LANDSCAPE PLAN - EAST PARKING LOT C9.01 DETAILS C9.02 DETAILS C9.03 DETAILS 12 OF 12 SUBSURFACE TREATMENT SYSTEM DETAILS ( ADS) 4 OF 4 SITE LIGHTING PLAN Meadowbrook Elementary School Parking Lot Improvements SAFEngineering Golden Valley, Minnesota Presented by: NO SCALE VICINITY MAP SITE CONSULTANT CONTACT LIST: N.T.S. Project Location Date Submittal / RevisionNo. Certification Sheet Title Summary Revision History Sheet No.Revision Project No. By Designed:Drawn: Approved:Book / Page: Phase:Initial Issue: ClientISD # 270 MEADOWBROOKELEMENTARYPARKING LOTIMPROVEMENTS GOLDENVALLEY, MN 5430 GLENWOOD AVE. NT JRW NT PRELIM.1/11/2021 21672.01 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SET OF PLANS ANDSPECIFICATIONS WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDERMY DIRECT SUPERVISION, AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. NEIL TESSIER, PE. DATE REGISTRATION NO. 2/22/2021 26364 SAFEngineering, PLLC Site and Athletic Facility Engineering 3200 122nd Ave. NEBlaine, MN 55449612-213-9859nrtessier@gmail.com 1 04/15/21 CITY REVIEW ISD #270 GLENWOOD AVENUE 394 55 100 ELECTRICAL MUSCO 20892 HARTFORD WAY LAKEVILLE, MN 55044 TEL 612-368-9286 CONTACT: SCOTT PEITZ TRUNK HIGHWAY NO. 100GLENWOOD AVENUEPARCEL 1PARCEL 1PARCEL 2LEGEND:PID#1902924330007CONTACT:SAFEngineering, PLLCNeil Tessier, PE3200 122nd Avenue NEBlaine, MN 55449612-213-9859nrtessier@gmail.comLHB12013DSURVLHB13DEXISTING CONDITIONSSURVEYCOUNTY/CITY:REVISIONS:PROJECT LOCATION:LAND SURVEYING, INC.CORNERSTONESuite #2001970 Northwestern AveStillwater, MN 55082Phone 651.275.8969Fax 651.275.8976dan@cssurvey.netDATEREVISIONPROJECT NO.FILE NAME5300GLENWOOD AVECITY OF GOLDEN VALLEYHENNEPINCOUNTY10-25-19 INITIAL ISSUECERTIFICATION:I hereby certify that this plan was prepared byme, or under my direct supervision, and that I ama duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws ofthe state of Minnesota.Daniel L. Thurmes Registration Number: 25718Date:__________________MEADOWBROOKELEMENTARYSCHOOLPID#19029243300195400GLENWOOD AVEPID#33118213400545430GLENWOOD AVE0NORTH40 80SHEET 2 OF 3SEE SHEET 3 OF 3 SHEETSFOR TREE INFORMATION10-25-19CALL BEFORE YOU DIG!TWIN CITY AREA:TOLL FREE:1-800-252-1166651-454-0002Gopher State One CallUNDERGROUND ELECTRICUNDERGROUND CABLE TVUNDERGROUND FIBER OPTICUNDERGROUND TELEPHONEOVERHEAD UTILITYUNDERGROUND GASSANITARY SEWERSTORM SEWERWATERMAINFENCECURB [TYPICAL]CONTOURSBITUMINOUS SURFACECONCRETE SURFACEGRAVEL SURFACEFOUND MONUMENTSET 1/2" IRON PIPEMARKED RLS NO. 25718CABLE TV PEDESTALAIR CONDITIONERELECTRIC MANHOLEELECTRIC METERELECTRIC PEDESTALELECTRIC TRANSFORMERLIGHT POLEGUY WIREPOWER POLEGAS MANHOLEGAS METERTELEPHONE MANHOLETELEPHONE PEDESTALSANITARY CLEANOUTSANITARY MANHOLECATCH BASINSTORM DRAINFLARED END SECTIONSTORM MANHOLEFIRE DEPT. CONNECTIONHYDRANTCURB STOPWATER WELLWATER MANHOLEWATER METERPOST INDICATOR VALVEWATER VALVEBOLLARDFLAG POLEMAIL BOXTRAFFIC SIGNUNKNOWN MANHOLESOIL BORINGSPOT ELEVATIONTRAFFIC SIGNALCONIFEROUS TREEDECIDUOUS TREE PID#1902924330007 CONTACT: SAFEngineering, PLLCNeil Tessier, PE 3200 122nd Avenue NEBlaine, MN 55449612-213-9859nrtessier@gmail.com VICINITY MAP COUNTY/CITY: REVISIONS: PROJECT LOCATION: DATE REVISION 5300GLENWOOD AVE CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY HENNEPINCOUNTY 5400 PID#1902924330019GLENWOOD AVE 10-25-19 INITIAL ISSUE CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that this plan was prepared byme, or under my direct supervision, and that I ama duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws ofthe state of Minnesota. Daniel L. Thurmes Registration Number: 25718 Date:__________________ MEADOWBROOK ELEMENTARY LHB12013D SURVLH13D EXISTING CONDITIONSSURVEY LAND SURVEYING, INC.CORNERSTONE Suite #2001970 Northwestern AveStillwater, MN 55082Phone 651.275.8969Fax 651.275.8976dan@cssurvey.net PROJECT NO. FILE NAME 1 Acer spp Maple 8 2 Betula nigra River Birch 6 3 Betula nigra River Birch 6 4 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 3 Multi Stem 5 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple Multi Stem 6 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple Multi Stem 7 Pinus sylvestris Scots Pine 4 8 Pinus sylvestris Scots Pine 4 9 Pinus sylvestris Scots Pine 4 10 Malus spp Ornamental Crab Apple 2 11 Malus spp Ornamental Crab Apple 2 12 Malus spp Ornamental Crab Apple 2 13 Sorbus spp Ornamental Mountain Ash 2 14 Sorbus spp Ornamental Mountain Ash 2 15 Sorbus spp Ornamental Mountain Ash 2 16 Sorbus spp Ornamental Mountain Ash 2 17 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 3 Multi Stem 18 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 3 Multi Stem 19 Salix spp Willow Spp Multi Stem 20 Betula nigra River Birch 6 Multi Stem 21 Betula nigra River Birch 24 Multi Stem 22 Betula nigra River Birch 6 Multi Stem 23 Fraxinus spp Ash 30 24 Malus spp Crab Apple 8 25 Malus spp Crab Apple 8 26 Fraxinus spp Ash 30 27 Magnolia spp Magnolia 2 28 Magnolia spp Magnolia 2 29 Magnolia spp Magnolia 2 30 Acer spp Maple 12 31 Malus spp Apple Tree- Fruit 6 32 Betula papyrifera Paper Birch Multi Stem 33 Betula papyrifera Paper Birch Multi Stem 34 Quercus macrocarpa Bur Oak 30 35 Pinus sylvestris Scots Pine 2 36 Pinus sylvestris Scots Pine 18 37 Fraxinus spp Ash 30 38 Celtis occidentalis Hackberry 6 39 Pinus sylvestris Scots Pine 24 40 Pinus sylvestris Scots Pine 24 41 Pinus sylvestris Scots Pine 15 42 Fraxinus spp Ash 24 43 Betula papyrifera Paper Birch 6 Multi Stem 44 Betula papyrifera Paper Birch 6 Multi Stem 45 Betula papyrifera Paper Birch 6 Multi Stem 46 Pinus sylvestris Scots Pine 12 47 Quercus rubra Red Oak 5 48 Pinus spp Pine 6 49 Betula nigra River Birch 6 Multi Stem 50 Pinus resinosa Red Pine 8 51 Pinus resinosa Red Pine 8 52 Fraxinus spp Ash 6 53 Fraxinus spp Ash 6 54 Fraxinus spp Ash 6 55 Pinus resinosa Red Pine 8 56 Pinus resinosa Red Pine 6 57 Pinus resinosa Red Pine 6 58 Quercus rubra Pin Oak 6 59 Quercus macrocarpa Bur Oak 4 60 Betula nigra River Birch 4 Multi Stem 61 Betula nigra River Birch 4 Multi Stem 62 Betula nigra River Birch 4 Multi Stem 63 Acer spp Maple 5 64 Acer spp Maple 5 65 Acer spp Maple 5 66 Acer spp Maple 5 67 Picea spp Spruce 6 68 Pinus spp Pine 6 69 Celtis occidentalis Hackberry 5 70 Ulmus thomasii Rock Elm 10 71 Acer spp Maple 2 72 Acer spp Maple 2 73 Acer spp Maple 2 74 Acer spp Maple 2 75 Robinia spp Locust Multi Stem 76 Robinia spp Locust 5 77 Robinia spp Locust 7 78 Tilia spp Linden 1 79 Robinia spp Locust 8 80 Robinia spp Locust 10 81 Picea spp Spruce 15 Half Dead 82 Tilia spp Linden 6 83 Tilia spp Linden 6 84 Tilia spp Linden 36 85 Tilia spp Linden 6 86 Tilia spp Linden 8 87 Ulmus thomasii Rock Elm 7 88 Ulmus thomasii Rock Elm 4 89 Amur Chockcherry Amur Chockcherry 4 90 Fraxinus spp Ash 12 91 N/A N/A 92 Fraxinus spp Ash 12 93 Malus spp Crab Apple 8 Multi Stem 94 Fraxinus spp Ash 10 95 Tilia spp Linden 4 96 Fraxinus spp Ash 18 97 Celtis occidentalis Hackberry 12 98 Fraxinus spp Ash 12 99 Syringa reticulata Tree Lilac 6 100 Picea spp Spruce 6 101 Abies balsamea Balsam Fir 6 102 Fraxinus spp Ash 24 103 Malus spp Crab Apple Multi Stem 104 Malus spp Crab Apple Multi Stem 105 Malus spp Crab Apple 6 Multi Stem 106 Malus spp Crab Apple 6 107  Acer negundo Box Elder 12 108 Celtis occidentalis Hackberry 10 109 Celtis occidentalis Hackberry 8 110 Celtis occidentalis Hackberry 8 111 Celtis occidentalis Hackberry 6 112 N/A N/A 113 Celtis occidentalis Hackberry 8 114 Malus spp Crab Apple 5 115 Celtis occidentalis Hackberry 6 116 Quercus spp Oak 8 117 Robinia spp Locust 10 118 Ulmus thomasii Rock Elm 8 119 Betula nigra River Birch 4 Multi Stem 120 Betula nigra River Birch 4 Multi Stem 121 Betula nigra River Birch 4 Multi Stem 122 Betula nigra River Birch 4 Multi Stem 123 Betula nigra River Birch 4 Multi Stem 124 Betula nigra River Birch 4 Multi Stem 125 Betula nigra River Birch 4 Multi Stem 126 Betula nigra River Birch 4 Multi Stem 127 Betula nigra River Birch 4 Multi Stem 128 Betula nigra River Birch 4 Multi Stem 129 Betula nigra River Birch 4 Multi Stem 130 Betula nigra River Birch 4 Multi Stem 131 Betula nigra River Birch 4 Multi Stem 132 Fraxinus spp Ash 24 Mostly Dead 133  Acer negundo Box Elder 6 134 Betula nigra River Birch 6 Multi Stem 135 Betula nigra River Birch 6 Multi Stem 136 Picea spp Spruce 8 901 Prunus spp.Crab Apple 4 902 Prunus spp.Crab Apple 4 903 Prunus spp.Crab Apple 4 904 Prunus spp.Crab Apple 4 905 Prunus spp.Crab Apple 3 906 Prunus spp.Crab Apple 5 907 Prunus spp.Crab Apple 6 908 Prunus spp.Crab Apple 9 909 Prunus spp.Crab Apple 9 910 Fraxinus spp.Ash 10 911 Fraxinus spp.Ash 9 912 Acer plataniodes Norway Maple 8 913 Acer plataniodes Norway Maple 8 914 Acer plataniodes Norway Maple 9 915 Acer spp.Maple 4 916 Picea pungens Blue Spruce 7 917 Prunus spp.Crab Apple 4 918 Prunus spp.Crab Apple 4 919 Picea pungens Blue Spruce 8 920 Picea pp.Spruce 6 921 Picea pungens Blue Spruce 8 922 Acer spp.Maple 4 923 Acer spp.Maple 5 924 Picea pungens Blue Spruce 7 925 Picea spp.Spruce 5 926 Picea pungens Blue Spruce 6 927 Tilia cordata Small Leaf Linden 4 928 Acer saccarinum Silver Maple 16/14 Double 929 Picea pungens Blue Spruce 6 930 Picea spp.Spruce 8 931 Picea spp.Spruce 6 932 Picea pungens Blue Spruce 6 933 Populus deltoides Cottonwood 30 934 Populus deltoides Cottonwood 18/18/20 Triple 935 Fraxinus spp.Ash 12 936 Fraxinus spp.Ash 9/5 Twin 937 Populus deltoides Cottonwood 16 938 Fraxinus spp.Ash 10 939 Fraxinus spp.Ash 6 940 Populus deltoides Cottonwood 20 941 Populus deltoides Cottonwood 29 942 Fraxinus spp.Ash 8 943 Acer negundo Box Elder 15 Dead 944 Populus deltoides Cottonwood 18 945 Acer negundo Box Elder 11/12 Twin 946 Populus deltoides Cottonwood 10/10 Twin 947 Populus deltoides Cottonwood 12 948 Populus deltoides Cottonwood 21/26/32 Triple SCHOOL 10-25-19 5430 PID#3311821340054GLENWOOD AVE TRUNK HIGHWAY NO. 100GLENWOOD AVENUEPARCEL 3PROPOSED R/W EASEMENT VACATION(AREA SHOWN PER MNDOT DESCRIPTION)PROPOSED TRAILEASEMENT AREA #1PROPOSED R/W VACATIONPROPOSED R/W EASEMENT VACATIONPROPOSED TRAILEASEMENT AREA #2PROPOSED R/W (TO BEDEDICATED ON FUTURE PLAT)PROPOSED DRAINAGE ANDUTILITY EASEMENT AREAPARCEL 1PARCEL 2 PARCEL 4 PARCEL 5PARCEL 6PARCEL 7PARCEL 8PARCEL 8PID#1902924330007CONTACT:SAFEngineering, PLLCNeil Tessier, PE3200 122nd Avenue NEBlaine, MN 55449612-213-9859nrtessier@gmail.comLHB12013DSURVLHB13DPROPOSED R.O.W.SKETCHCOUNTY/CITY:PROJECT LOCATION:LAND SURVEYING, INC.CORNERSTONESuite #2001970 Northwestern AveStillwater, MN 55082Phone 651.275.8969Fax 651.275.8976dan@cssurvey.netPROJECT NO.FILE NAME5300CALL BEFORE YOU DIG!TWIN CITY AREA:TOLL FREE:1-800-252-1166651-454-0002Gopher State One CallGLENWOOD AVECITY OF GOLDEN VALLEYHENNEPINCOUNTYMEADOWBROOK0NORTH50 100ELEMENTARYSCHOOLPID#19029243300195400GLENWOOD AVEPID#33118213400545430GLENWOOD AVE TR U N K H I G H W A Y N O . 1 0 0 GLENWOOD AV E N U E TEMPORARYCURBS18A LIGHT POLE & FOOTING18A TREES 18A TREES 18A METAL RING18A BITUMINOUS18A TEMPORARY CURBS18A TURF18A CURB & GUTTER 18A CURB &GUTTER 18ASAWCUT SAWCUT BITUMINOUS18A CURB & GUTTER18A STORMWATER STRUCTURES19A SHELTER18A CONCRETE18A LIGHT POLE & FOOTING18A LIGHT POLE & FOOTING18ASTORMWATER CMP 19ALIGHT POLE & FOOTING18A CURB &GUTTER18A FES &RIP-RAP19A TREES18A FES & RIP-RAP18A WALL 19A CONCRETE18A CONCRETE19A SAWCUT RETAININGWALLS19A TEMPORARYCURBS18A TEMPORARYCURBS18A BITUMINOUS18A FES & RIP-RAP18A UTLITIES19A UTILITES19A FES 18A TURF18A TURF18A BITUMINOUS18A CURB &GUTTER18A 18A 10' OF 15" RCP18A 10' OF12" RCP18A 10' OF18" CMP18A BOULDERS18A FES 19A PLANTERS18A TREES18A CLEANOUT20A CLEANOUT20A SAWCUT 4' FROM BACK OF CURB UTILITIES19A UTILITIES19A BASINS20A SCALE IN FEET 0 6030 NORTH Feb 22, 2021 - 1:20pm - User:jworkman L:\PROJECTS\21672.01\CAD\Civil\Sheets\21672.01 - C2 - DEMO.dwg C2.02 DEMO PLAN -EAST PARKINGLOT Project Location Date Submittal / RevisionNo. Certification Sheet Title Summary Revision History Sheet No.Revision Project No. By Designed:Drawn: Approved:Book / Page: Phase:Initial Issue: ClientISD # 270 MEADOWBROOKELEMENTARYPARKING LOTIMPROVEMENTS GOLDENVALLEY, MN 5430 GLENWOOD AVE. NT JRW NT PRELIM.1/11/2021 21672.01 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SET OF PLANS ANDSPECIFICATIONS WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDERMY DIRECT SUPERVISION, AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. NEIL TESSIER, PE. DATE REGISTRATION NO. 2/22/2021 26364 SAFEngineering, PLLC Site and Athletic Facility Engineering 3200 122nd Ave. NEBlaine, MN 55449612-213-9859nrtessier@gmail.com LEGEND UNDERGROUND GAS STONE RETAINING WALL CHAIN LINK FENCE WOOD FENCE IRON FENCE WIRE FENCE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND CABLE TV UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE OVERHEAD ELECTRIC SANITARY SEWER FORCE MAIN WATERMAIN DRAIN TILE STORM SEWER LIGHT HYDRANT GAS METER SPRINKLER HEAD SPRINKLER VALVE GUARD RAIL HANDRAIL EDGE OF TREES TREES / SHRUBS CONCRETE GUARD POLES SIGNS CONCRETE CURB BITUMINOUS CURB BUILDING SAW CUT EXIST BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT REMOVE EXISTING UTILITY LINE EXISTING REMOVE BY CONTRACTOR KEYNOTES 18A SAVE IN PLACE19A ADJUST BY CONTRACTOR20A ADJUST BY OWNER21A NO PARKINGNO PARKINGPROPOSED R/W V A C A T I O N PROPOSED R/W E A S E M E N T V A C A T I O N PR O P O S E D D R A I N A G E A N D U T I L I T Y E A S E M E N T A R E AWE T L A N D TR U N K H I G H W A Y N O . 1 0 0 GLENWOOD AV E N U E LT LT PIVGM ELEC.BOX GASMETER GRAVELGRAVEL GRAVELGRAVE L GRAVEL 24'24'9'24'18.5'18.5'18.5'24'18.5' 30' SAW CUT LINE NEW CATCH BASIN NEW CATCH BASIN FLUME & 5 CY RIP RAP SAW CUT LINE 02G 04A FES & 10 CY RIP-RAP 04F SIGN 07A SIGN07H 04A 04B CURB & GUTTER01C CURB & GUTTER01C 03A CURB AND GUTTER01A 03A24'03A CURB & GUTTER01A HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE 02B 03A 03A CURB & GUTTER01A NEW 12" RCP @ 10' NEW 15" RCP @ 20' NEW 18" CMP @ 30' CONCRETESIDEWALK02A ADA RAMP ADA PARKINGSIGNS ONBUILDING CURB AND GUTTER01A 48.3'79.2'21.9'91.2'55.1'24'22.3'55.7'11'52'76'27.8' 55. 6 ' 5' NEW MANHOLE 18.5' 24' 18.5' 02C32'68.2'CURB & GUTTER01C MANHOLE04B CURB & GUTTER01A NEW FES WITH 10 CY RIPRAP04F CLEANOUT04J CLEANOUT04J 92'53'5' CURB & GUTTER01A MANHOLE04B CATCH BASIN04B MANHOLE04BMANHOLE04B 4" W x 6' LWHITE DASHED STRIPES 4" W x 6' LWHITE DASHED STRIPES 4" W SOLID YELLOWSTRIPE 13'13' MANHOLE04B16'28'15' 07B 07G07H 04B 4" W x 6' L WHITE DASHED STRIPES SIGN07A07G07H 07G 04B MANHOLE07E REMOVE AND RESETEXISTING CB CASTINGS04B CONTINUE STRIPES TO BUILDING 12'12'-87B -87B -87B -87B -87B -87B -87B -87B -87B -87B -87B -87B -87B -87B Project Location Date Submittal / RevisionNo. Certification Sheet Title Summary Revision History Sheet No.Revision Project No. By Designed:Drawn: Approved:Book / Page: Phase:Initial Issue: ClientISD # 270 MEADOWBROOKELEMENTARYPARKING LOTIMPROVEMENTS GOLDENVALLEY, MN 5430 GLENWOOD AVE. NT JRW NT PRELIM.1/11/2021 21672.01 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SET OF PLANS ANDSPECIFICATIONS WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDERMY DIRECT SUPERVISION, AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. NEIL TESSIER, PE. DATE REGISTRATION NO. 2/22/2021 26364 SAFEngineering, PLLC Site and Athletic Facility Engineering 3200 122nd Ave. NEBlaine, MN 55449612-213-9859nrtessier@gmail.com 1 04/15/21 CITY REVIEW LEGEND EASEMENT CURB & GUTTER BUILDING RETAINING WALL CHAINLINK FENCE NUMBER OF PARKING STALLS PER ROW SIGN PIPE BOLLARD STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVING HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT PAVING CONCRETE PAVING PROPERTY LIMIT EXISTINGPROPOSED KEY NOTE WETLAND LIMITS TREELINE XX XX 0 NORTH SCALE IN FEET 30 60 Apr 15, 2021 - 11:51am - User:jworkman L:\PROJECTS\21672.01\CAD\Civil\Sheets\21672.01 - C3 - SITE.dwg C3.01 SITE PLAN -EAST PARKINGLOT DETAIL XX 04F FLARED END SECTION WITH RIP-RAP DETAIL KEYNOTES 02G FLUME 01A D312 CURB AND GUTTER 03A STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVING 07A SIGN POST 04B MANHOLE CATCH BASIN 02A CONCRETE SIDEWALK 02B HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE 02C ADA ACCESSIBLE RAMP 01C B612 CURB AND GUTTER 04J CLEAN OUT LIGHT POLE 04A CURB CATCH BASIN 07E ADA SYMBOL 07H DO NOT ENTER SIGN 07B ADA SIGNS 07G STOP SIGN 87B LIGHT POLE MAINTENANCE STRIP 1 1 1 857.9 861860859858858858858 857 856 855 854853852 8 6 4 86386 2 8 61 8 60 85985 9 858 857 856 857.3 858.3 858.2 858.2 858.1858.2 858.0 857.6 857.9 857.6 857.9 857.9 858.3 858.4 858.2858.8 859 859.9 86 0 860.7 857.0 856.5 859861862863864865866867868856.8 856.8860857.4 859860PROPOSED R/W V A C A T I O N PROPOSED R/W E A S E M E N T V A C A T I O N PR O P O S E D D R A I N A G E A N D U T I L I T Y E A S E M E N T A R E A851 CB 02 RE=857.00 IE=853.20 (E) SUMP=851.2 39 LF - 12" SCH 40 PVC @ 0.72% 18 LF - 15" RCP CONNECT TO EXISTING 853.50* *(FIELD VERIFY) 41 LF - 12" SCH40 PVC @ 0.5% CB 03 RE=855.50 IE=853.05 SW SUMP=851.05 5 LF - 15" SCH 40PVC @ 1.2% MH 09RE=868.00 IE=864.90 (SE) IE=862.00 (NW) 12 LF - 12"RCP @ 1.00% 40 LF - 18" CMP @ 3.8% MH 04RE=858.25 IE=853.13 (W) IE=852.92 (N) MH 03 RE=858.00 IE=853.13 NEIE=852.92 NWIE=852.92 W 10 LF - 15" SCH 40 PVC @ 1.0%FES 01 IE=850.00 FES 02IE=855.00 FIELD VERIFY CB 01 RE=856.80 IE=854.20 (SE) IE=854.15 (NW) SUMP=852.15 61 LF - 12"SCH40PVC @ 13.2% MH 05RE=857.70IE=853.75 MH 07RE=857.75IE=853.75 SEIE=853.75 EIE=853.75 N MH 06RE=857.80IE=853.75 MH 08RE=857.60IE=853.75 W IE=853.75 S IE=853.75 N MH 02 RE=856.00 IE=853.50 (W) IE=853.13 (SW) IE=852.92 (S)MH 01 RE=856.35 IE=853.13 (E) IE=852.92 (S) IE=852.40 (N) 30 LF - 15" SCH 40 PVC @ 7.3% PIPE01 - 15" OUTIE=852.20 PIPE04 - 15" INIE=852.34 PIPE03 - 12" OUT IE=853.87 PIPE02 - 15" INIE=852.98 12 LF - 15" SCH 40PVC @ 0.3% 9 LF - 12" PVC @ 3.78% PIPE07 - 12" INIE=853.80 PIPE06 - 15" OUTIE=853.70 PIPE05 - 15" IN IE=853.55 PIPE08 - 12" OUTIE=855.47 10' WIDE VEGETATED GRASS SWALE TODISSIPATE STORMWATER FLOW. SCALE IN FEET 0 6030 NORTH Apr 15, 2021 - 11:51am - User:jworkman L:\PROJECTS\21672.01\CAD\Civil\Sheets\21672.01 - C4 - GRAD.dwg C4.01 GRADING PLAN- EAST PARKINGLOT Project Location Date Submittal / RevisionNo. Certification Sheet Title Summary Revision History Sheet No.Revision Project No. By Designed:Drawn: Approved:Book / Page: Phase:Initial Issue: ClientISD # 270 MEADOWBROOKELEMENTARYPARKING LOTIMPROVEMENTS GOLDENVALLEY, MN 5430 GLENWOOD AVE. NT JRW NT PRELIM.1/11/2021 21672.01 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SET OF PLANS ANDSPECIFICATIONS WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDERMY DIRECT SUPERVISION, AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. NEIL TESSIER, PE. DATE REGISTRATION NO. 2/22/2021 26364 SAFEngineering, PLLC Site and Athletic Facility Engineering 3200 122nd Ave. NEBlaine, MN 55449612-213-9859nrtessier@gmail.com 1 04/15/21 CITY REVIEW 902.5X 902 SPOT ELEVATION CONTOUR RIP RAP OVERFLOW ELEV. CURB & GUTTER BUILDING RETAINING WALL PROPERTY LIMIT EXISTINGPROPOSED LEGEND WETLAND LIMITS TREELINE STORM SEWER SOIL BORINGS DRAINTILE EOF 902.5 D LIGHT POLE1 1 NO PARKINGNO PARKING861860859858858858858 857 856 855 854853852 8 6 4 863 86 2 86 1 8 60 85985 9 858 857 856 86 0 859861862863864865866867868860859860PROPOSED R/W V A C A T I O N PROPOSED R/W E A S E M E N T V A C A T I O N PR O P O S E D D R A I N A G E A N D U T I L I T Y E A S E M E N T A R E A851WE T L A N D TR U N K H I G H W A Y N O . 1 0 0 GLENWOOD AV E N U E LT LT PIVGM ELEC.BOX GASMETER GRAVELGRAVEL GRAVELGRAVE L GRAVEL Project Location Date Submittal / RevisionNo. Certification Sheet Title Summary Revision History Sheet No.Revision Project No. By Designed:Drawn: Approved:Book / Page: Phase:Initial Issue: ClientISD # 270 MEADOWBROOKELEMENTARYPARKING LOTIMPROVEMENTS GOLDENVALLEY, MN 5430 GLENWOOD AVE. NT JRW NT PRELIM.1/11/2021 21672.01 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SET OF PLANS ANDSPECIFICATIONS WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDERMY DIRECT SUPERVISION, AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. NEIL TESSIER, PE. DATE REGISTRATION NO. 2/22/2021 26364 SAFEngineering, PLLC Site and Athletic Facility Engineering 3200 122nd Ave. NEBlaine, MN 55449612-213-9859nrtessier@gmail.com 1 04/15/21 CITY REVIEW 0 NORTH SCALE IN FEET 30 60 Apr 15, 2021 - 11:51am - User:jworkman L:\PROJECTS\21672.01\CAD\Civil\Sheets\21672.01 - C5 - EROS.dwg C5.01 EROSIONCONTROL PLAN- EASTPARKING LOT DIRECTION OF OVERLAND FLOW TEMPORARY DIVERSION DITCH LIMITS OF DRAINAGE SUB-BASIN INLET PROTECTION DEVICE TEMPORARY STONE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE OVERFLOW ELEV. CONTOUR RIP RAP CHECK DAM SILT FENCE SOIL BORINGS EXISTINGPROPOSED STORM SEWER CURB & GUTTER DRAINTILE THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN SHEETS ALONG WITH THE REST OF THE SWPPP MUST BE KEPT ONSITE UNTIL THE NOTICE OF TERMINATION IS FILED WITH THE MPCA, THE CONTRACTOR MUST UPDATE THE SWPPP, INCLUDING THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN SHEETS AS NECESSARY TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS, SUCH AS ADDITIONAL OR MODIFIED BMPS DESIGNED TO CORRECT PROBLEMS IDENTIFIED. AFTER FILING THE NOTICE OF TERMINATION, THE SWPPP, INCLUDING THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN SHEETS, AND ALL REVISIONS TO IT MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE OWNER, TO BE KEPT ON FILE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RECORD RETENTION REQUIREMENTS DESCRIBED IN THE SWPPP NARRATIVE. SILT DIKE BIO-ROLL LEGEND NOTE TO CONTRACTOR EOF 902.5 D 902 IPX LIGHT POLE 1 NO PARKINGNO PARKING861860859858858858858 857 856 855 854853852 8 6 4 863 86 2 86 1 8 60 85985 9 858 857 856 86 0 859861862863864865866867868860859860PROPOSED R/W V A C A T I O N PROPOSED R/W E A S E M E N T V A C A T I O N PR O P O S E D D R A I N A G E A N D U T I L I T Y E A S E M E N T A R E A851WE T L A N D TR U N K H I G H W A Y N O . 1 0 0 GLENWOOD AV E N U E LT LT PIVGM ELEC.BOX GASMETER GRAVELGRAVEL GRAVELGRAVE L GRAVEL 5PSE 5HHR 3HAB 6CD 5PSE 5SJL 3WSL 3WSL 1AB 1AB AB1 WS3 LANDSCAPE EDGING 4IL 4IL 2IL 10' WIDE 32-261 SEED MIX. VEGETATED GRASS SWALE TO DISSIPATE STORMWATER FLOW. Project Location Date Submittal / RevisionNo. Certification Sheet Title Summary Revision History Sheet No.Revision Project No. By Designed:Drawn: Approved:Book / Page: Phase:Initial Issue: ClientISD # 270 MEADOWBROOKELEMENTARYPARKING LOTIMPROVEMENTS GOLDENVALLEY, MN 5430 GLENWOOD AVE. NT JRW NT PRELIM.1/11/2021 21672.01 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SET OF PLANS ANDSPECIFICATIONS WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDERMY DIRECT SUPERVISION, AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. NEIL TESSIER, PE. DATE REGISTRATION NO. 2/22/2021 26364 SAFEngineering, PLLC Site and Athletic Facility Engineering 3200 122nd Ave. NEBlaine, MN 55449612-213-9859nrtessier@gmail.com 1 04/15/21 CITY REVIEW LEGEND EASEMENT CURB & GUTTER BUILDING RETAINING WALL CHAINLINK FENCE SIGN PIPE BOLLARD STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVING HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT PAVING CONCRETE PAVING PROPERTY LIMIT EXISTINGPROPOSED WETLAND LIMITS TREELINE 0 NORTH SCALE IN FEET 30 60 Apr 15, 2021 - 11:51am - User:jworkman L:\PROJECTS\21672.01\CAD\Civil\Sheets\21672.01 - L1 - LSCP.dwg L1.01 LANDSCAPEPLAN - EASTPARKING LOT LANDSCAPE NOTES 1.ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO RECEIVE 4" OF TOPSOIL. 2.SEEDED AREAS TO BE COVERED WITH A NORTH AMERICAN GREEN SC 150 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET. 3.INSTALL PROFESSIONAL LANDSCAPE EDGING AS REQUIRED. 4.INSTALL 4" COCOA BROWN HARDWOOD MULCH FROM WEST METRO SUPPLY OVER NON-WOVEN SOIL SEPARATION FABRIC IN PLANTING BEDS. LIGHT POLE TREES CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT CAL SIZE QTY AB Acer freemanii `Autumn Blaze` / Autumn Blaze Maple B & B 2.5"Cal 3 WS Betula papyrifera `Whitespire` / Whitespire Birch B & B Clump 10`3 ORN. TREES CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT CAL SIZE QTY IL Syringa reticulata `Ivory Silk` / Ivory Silk Japanese Tree Lilac B & B 2"Cal 10 SHRUBS CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT QTY CD Cornus sericea `Alleman`s Compact` / Dwarf Red Twig Dogwood 5 gal 6 HAB Hydrangea arborescens `Abetwo` / Incrediball Hydrangea 5 gal 3 SJL Spiraea japonica `Little Princess` / Japanese Spirea 5 gal 5 WSL Weigela x `Slingco 1` TM / Crimson Kisses Weigela 2 gal.6 PERENNIALS CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT QTY HHR Hemerocallis x `Happy Returns` / Happy Returns Daylily 1 gal 5 PSE Phlox subulata `Emerald Blue` / Emerald Blue Creeping Phlox 1 gal 10 GROUND COVERS CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT 33-261 MNDOT Seed Mix 33-261 / Ponds and Wet Areas Seed TUR HIG Turf Sod Highland Sod / Sod Sod PLANT SCHEDULE - EAST PARKING LOT 1 1 PROJECT SUMMARYNot to be reproduced in whole or part without the written consent of Musco Sports Lighting, LLC. ©1981, 2021 Musco Sports Lighting, LLC.ENGINEERED DESIGNNOTEPole Height is 22' with 3' Bases. Mounting Height is at 25'.Meadowbrook Elementary School Parking LotHopkins, MN USALighng System Pole / Fixture SummaryPole IDPole HeightMtg HeightFixture QtyLuminaire TypeLoadCircuitM1-M3--25'2CREE OSQ0.26 kWAP1-P4, P6-P7,P9-P1422'22'2CREE OSQ0.26 kWAP522'22'3CREE OSQ0.39 kWAP822'22'1CREE OSQ0.13 kWA17344.42 kW Circuit SummaryCircuitDescriptionLoadFixture QtyAParking4.42 kW34 Fixture Type SummaryTypeSourceWattageLumensL90L80L70QuantityCREE OSQLED 5700K - 70 CRI130W16,599------34Light Level Summary Calculation Grid SummaryIlluminationGrid NameCalculation MetricAveMinMaxMax/MinAve/MinCircuitsFixture QtyGridHorizontal Illuminance0000.00A34Parking LotHorizontal6.822178.353.41A34 ILLUMINATION SUMMARYNot to be reproduced in whole or part without the written consent of Musco Sports Lighting, LLC. ©1981, 2021 Musco Sports Lighting, LLC.ENGINEERED DESIGN223 7 7 114 54 4 6 8 10 7 5 44 5 107 6 75 9 5 4 4 4 4 5 7 106 7 86 4 3 3 3 4 5 86 9 112 3 57 8 74 4 54 42 3 343 49 10 5 5 4 56 711 8 6 6 6 56 10 1013 10 7 7 6 77 1011 12 10 8 7 87 10 1112 11 12 11 9 11 1011 1013 12 9 8 7 87 614 10 7 6 53 4 714 10 6 5 43 5 812 11 6 5 54 7 9 12 10 9 7 5 5 84 5 6 5 4 5 5 7 11 11 10 104 3 3 3 5 6 6 7 8 12 11 83 3 4 4 5 5 6 10 13 97 6 6 4 3 4 5 6 9 12 1110 8 5 3 2 3 3 5 9 12 11 12 12 1510 8 6 4 3 2 2 3 6 7 7 9 111716 13118 6 5 3 2 2 3 4 6 7 7 8 11 10 9 10 9 11 69 9 5 5 3 2 2 3 4 7 8 7 7 8 8 7 8 10 8 7 45 7 10 7 4 3 2 2 3 5 6 11 9 9 7 657 10 7 4 3 2 3 4 5 7 11 9 9 7 49 9 6 5 3 3 3 5 6 8 10 11 8 511 8 6 5 4 4 4 6 8 11 1111 8 6 6 5 5 6 9 9 8 811 8 7 6 5 6 9 6 58 8 6 7 8 10 78 10 9 108 910 9 107 6 74 4 53 4 43 3 3 34 4 46 5 510 7 7 8 510 10 8 4P1P2P4P5P6P7P9P10P11P12P13P3P8M2M3M1P14SCALE IN FEET 1 : 800'80'160'EQUIPMENT LIST FOR AREAS SHOWNPoleLuminairesQTYLOCATIONSIZEGRADEELEVATIONMOUNTINGHEIGHTLUMINAIRETYPEQTY /POLETHISGRIDOTHERGRIDS3M1-M325'25'CREE OSQ22012P1-P4P6-P7P9-P1422'3'25'CREE OSQ2201P522'3'25'CREE OSQ2/1*301P822'3'25'CREE OSQ11017TOTALS34340 * -- P 0,0 f pMeadowbrook Elementary School Parking LotHopkins, MN USAGRID SUMMARYName: Parking LotSp: 10.0' x 10.0'H: 3.0' ILLUMINATION SUMMARYMAINAINED HORIZONAL FOOCANDLESE Scan Average:6.82Mx: 17M: 2A / M: 3.31Max / Min:8.35U j p: 2.40CU: 0.46N. f P: 382LUMINAIRE INFORMAIONApp C: ANo. of Luminaires: 34 L: 4.42 WGuaranteed Performance: ILLUMINAION p y MWy 0.95 p f.Field Measurements:I y y fp- p w IESNA RP-6-15.Electrical System Requirements:Rf ApDw C / "Musco Control System Summary"f .Installaon Requirements:R ± 3% f w 3 f 1 f . ILLUMINATION SUMMARYNot to be reproduced in whole or part without the written consent of Musco Sports Lighting, LLC. ©1981, 2021 Musco Sports Lighting, LLC.ENGINEERED DESIGNy: S F 204066F 04--21P1P2P4P5P6P7P9P10P11P12P13P3P873'188'86'63'11'110'241'146'89'50'47'12'101'19'178'69'217'22'175'75'103'19'31'18'88'99'27'152'142'172'27'72'144'52'M2M3M1P14SCALE IN FEET 1 : 800'80'160'EQUIPMENT LIST FOR AREAS SHOWNPoleLuminairesQTYLOCATIONSIZEGRADEELEVATIONMOUNTINGHEIGHTLUMINAIRETYPEQTY /POLETHISGRIDOTHERGRIDS3M1-M325'25'CREE OSQ22012P1-P4P6-P7P9-P1422'3'25'CREE OSQ2201P522'3'25'CREE OSQ2/1*301P822'3'25'CREE OSQ11017TOTALS343400,0fpMeadowbrook Elementary School Parking LotHopkins, MN USAGRID SUMMARYName: GridSp: 10.0'x10.0'H: 3.0'ILLUMINATION SUMMARYMAINAINEDHORIZONALFOOCANDLESEScan Average:0.00Mx: 0M: 0A/M: 0.00Max / Min:-Ujp: 0.00N.f: 0LUMINAIREINFORMAIONAppC: ANo. of Luminaires: 34L: 4.42WGuaranteed Performance:ILLUMINAIONpyMWy0.95pf.Field Measurements:IyyfppwIESNAR615.Electrical System Requirements:RfApDwC/"Musco Control System Summary"f.Installaon Requirements:R±3%fw3f1f. EQUIPMENT LAYOUTNot to be reproduced in whole or part without the written consent of Musco Sports Lighting, LLC. ©1981, 2021 Musco Sports Lighting, LLC.ENGINEERED DESIGNy:SF204066F0421P1P2P4P5P6P7P9P10P11P12P13P3P8M2M3M1P14SCALE IN FEET 1 : 1000'100'200'0,0fpMeadowbrook Elementary School Parking LotHopkins, MN USAEQUIPMENT LAYOUTINCLUDES:Electrical System Requirements:RfApDwC/"Musco Control System Summary"f.Installaon Requirements:R±3%fw3f1f.EQUIPMENT LIST FOR AREAS SHOWNPoleLuminairesQTYLOCATIONSIZEGRADEELEVATIONMOUNTINGHEIGHTLUMINAIRETYPEQTY /POLE3M1-M325'25'CREE OSQ212P1-P4P6-P7P9-P1422'3'25'CREE OSQ21P522'3'25'CREE OSQ2/1*1P822'3'25'CREE OSQ117TOTALS34SINGLE LUMINAIRE AMPERAGE DRAW CHART S(.90 m wr fr)L Amrg Pr Lumr(mx drw)SPV208(60)220(60)240(60)277(60)347(60)380(60)480(60)COSQ0.4 0.3