Loading...
#225 03-05-63 Sponsored Citizens League of Minneapolis1 1 1 Resolution No. 225 March 5, 1963 Member Flannagan introduced the following resolution and MOVED its adoption: RESOLUTION RELATING TO A BILL FOR AN ACT, SPONSORED BY THE CITIZENS LEAGUE OF MINNEAPOLIS AND HENNEPIN COUNTY TO ESTABLISH A COUNTY COURT SYSTEM FOR ALL OF HENNEPIN COUNTY AND ALSO RELATING TO A BILL FOR AN ACT, SPONSORED BY THE HENNEPIN COUNTY SUBURBAN MUNICIPAL JUDGES1 ASSOCIATION TO ESTABLISH A UNIFIED COURT SYSTEM FOR ALL OF HENNEPIN COUNTY LYING OUTSIDE THE CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS WHEREAS, the bill for an act to establish a County Court System, for all of Hennepin County, will abolish the Municipal Court of the Village of Golden Valley and will abrogate to a large extent the local autonomy and cause substantial expense and undue hardship to its citizens, police depart- ment and prosecuting attorney's office thereof; and WHEREAS, the bill for an act to establish a unified Court system for all of Hennepin County, lying outside of the City of Minneapolis, will confirm and keep in operation, the Municipal Court of said Village of Golden Valley and will otherwise provide for substantial improvements in the funtions and operations of said Court in cooperation with other Courts in said area; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Village Council of the Village of Golden Valley that the Council oppose the proposed legislation by Citizens League to establish a County Court System for all of Hennepinhe County, AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, by the Village Council of the Village of Golden Valley that it will support legislation to establish a Unified Court System for all of Hennepin County, lying outside the City of Minneapplis, and all as per the bill for such an act sponsored by the Hennepin County Municipal Suburban Judges Association. Passed and adopted this 5th day of Attest: Village Clerk March 1963. Mayor The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member Schaphorst and, upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Flannagan, Nadasdy, Schaphorst, Scherer, and Teresi; and the follow- ing voted against the same: None, whereupon said resodeclared duly lution was decl passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and his signature attested cl the Clerk. 25