96-096 - 10-15 Amend Pavement Management PolicyResolution 96-96
October 15, 1996
Member Russell introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION AMENDING THE CITY'S
PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT POLICY
WHEREAS, Resolution 95-5, adopting a Pavement Management Program
("Program") was approved by the Golden Valley City Council ("Council") on January 17,
1995; and,
WHEREAS, the Council now wishes to amend the Program, to provide options
related to curb and gutter and street design.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Golden
Valley that the Pavement Management Policy for the City of Golden Valley adopted in
Resolution 95-5 is hereby amended and superseded by the Amended Pavement
Management Policy dated "Amended October 15, 1996", and attached Thereto as Exhibit A.
Mary E. Anderson, Mayor
ATTEST:
Shirley J. Nelson, City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member Micks
and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Anderson,
Johnson, LeSuer, Micks and Russell; and the following voted against the same: none,
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor
and her signature attested by the City Clerk.
Ll
0
0
•
Resolution 96-96 - Continued
Exhibit A
ctober 15, 1996
CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY
PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT POLICY
ADOPTED
AMENDED
JANUARY 17, 1995
OCTOBER 15, 1996
RESOLUTION 95-5
RESOLUTION 96-96
Resolution 96-96 - Continued October 15, 1996
. Pavement Management Policy
for
The City of Golden Valley
January 17, 1995
Amended October 151996
Purpose
There are approximately 119 miles of street to be maintained within the City of Golden
Valley. Of this total, 23 miles are designated as Municipal State Aid ;(MSA) roadways
and the remaining 96 miles are local streets. Keeping the street system in good
condition is necessary to provide safe and reasonable transportation to the citizens of
the City, to maintain property values, and to keep the City an attractive and desirable
place to live and do business.
The goal of the Pavement Management Policy is to establish a Pavement Management
Program (PMP) that systematically evaluates the street network to maximize the
pavement lifespan, at minimum long-term .cost, by performing the proper rehabilitation
measure at the proper time.
• Background
A street constructed to today's standards can be expected to have an average effective
lifespan of 50 years if proper maintenance measures (crack sealing, !sealcoating, and
bituminous overlays) are performed at the proper times. The average i age of the local
streets within the City of Golden Valley is 30 years. In general, streets) more than 20 to
25 years old were not constructed properly when compared to today'si standards. Most
were constructed without removing unsuitable soils from the street subgrade, which
causes the street to crack, distort, and break-up under normal traffic loading. This
breakup of the pavement allows moisture into the subgrade, which further accelerates
deterioration. For streets with failed pavements and poor subgrades, reconstruction has
been determined to be the most cost-effective method of long-term rehabilitation,
followed by proper and timely maintenance procedures.
Many of Golden Valley's streets are newer, having been constructed' or reconstructed
to City standards within the last 20 years. Although the pavement on these streets also
exhibits some distress, rehabilitation methods such as sealcoating and bituminous
overlays are usually appropriate for prolonging their useful life.
The Pavement Management Program (PMP)
The entire street system under the jurisdiction of the City of Golden (Valley has been
broken into segments, which are evaluated by staff and consultants to determine the
type of pavement distresses present. Staff then records the severity and extent of each
Resolution 96-96 - Continued October 15, 1996
• pavement distress as well as the quality of the ride .on each street segment. Using a
pavement management computer program, staff analyzes the recorded information and
assigns a pavement quality index (PQI) to each street segment. For example, a PQI of
10 represents a newly constructed street with little or no distress evident, and a PQI of
2 represents a street pavement that has completely failed. The PCI of each street
segment is then inventoried, and streets are selected for rehabilitation measures based
on staff opinion and the recommendations of the computer software.
Because streets decay at different rates depending on subgrade and pavement
conditions, staff will evaluate the pavement and assign PQls every year. Every third
year, a consultant will conduct a complete inventory and evaluation of the street
system. This will ensure that the baseline data being used for decision making is
current and that each street in the system receives appropriate rehabilitation measures
when the need for maintenance first arises. Rehabilitation measures will include
sealcoating, edge and full -width milling and overlays, and total street reconstruction.
Sealcoating
Sealcoating is a preventive maintenance measure used to extend the life of a
bituminous pavement. Oil and aggregate is applied to help seal out (moisture, reduce
abrasion of the existing surface, increase skid resistance, and help prevent older
40 pavements from drying out and prematurely deteriorating. A properly installed sealcoat
should last approximately six to 10 years.
Sealcoating will be applied to those streets in the system that have- concrete curb and
gutter and do not exhibit distresses indicative of poor street subgrade. The PQI of these
streets will typically be greater than 7.0. The sealcoating process will include crack
sealing, routine patching, and limited repair of concrete curb and gutter.
Bituminous Milling and Overlay
Bituminous milling and overlay consists of mechanically removing a portion of the
existing bituminous pavement, usually up to one and one-half inches (1.5), and placing
new pavement. After placement of a bituminous overlay, properly timed sealcoating can
extend the life of a street for 20 to 25 years before another overlay is required.
Bituminous overlays will be performed only on those streets that have been constructed
to City standards and do not have distresses indicative of a poor subgrade. The streets
receiving overlays also will be subject to crack sealing, curb repair, and patching before
the placement of the overlays. The PQI of these streets will vary between 6.0 to 8.0,
depending on the types of distress present.
0
•
Resolution 96-96 - Continued October 15, 1996
Reconstruction
Reconstruction will be performed on streets that do not currently have concrete curb
and gutter as well as on streets with curb and gutter that have deteriorated to the point
where reconstruction is the only cost-effective method of rehabilitation'; Sanitary sewer,
watermain, and storm sewer systems on streets subject to reconstruction will also be
investigated as part of the PMP. Those utilities that exhibit inadequate capacity,
maintenance problems, and that do not meet specific state or federal' requirements for
the utility will be repaired or replaced as part of the street reconstruction project.
Based on the street ratings previously discussed, staff will recommend streets for
reconstruction each year of the PMP. Highest priority for reconstruction is to be given to
the worst streets, or those with the lowest PQls. However, if several ,streets within an
area are projected for reconstruction within a five- year period, these streets may be
recommended for reconstruction simultaneously to limit the number of years a
neighborhood is disrupted by construction.
Construction Standards
As defined in the City Code, the standard for new residential roadways in the
City of Golden Valley is 30 feet wide with concrete curb and gutter. Parking is
allowed on both sides of a standard residential street. Whenever possible,
design of streets subject to reconstruction will strive to maintain existing street
widths, alignments and parking conditions. Variation from existing conditions,
including parking and street width, will be considered in the following situations:
1. On Municipal State Aid streets where MSA standards must be
followed.
2. On collector and local streets where traffic volumes exceed 500
vehicles per day.
3. Where there are existing unsafe conditions.
4. Where maintaining existing conditions creates undue hardship on
adjacent properties or elsewhere on the project.
5. To avoid environmental impacts such as wetland filling and removal of
significant trees.
Concrete Curb and Gutter
Concrete curb and gutter provides structural support for the edge of the
paved roadway, aids in snow removal, and facilitates drainage of storm
water for water quality treatment and minimizing damage to adjacent
properties. Therefore, preliminary design of streets subject to
reconstruction will include concrete curb and gutter. However, some
residents may view curb and gutter as aesthetically undesirable in most
. cases, residents will have an opportunity before the public hearing to
petition to have curb and gutter removed from the proposed project. This
Resolution 96-96 - Continued
October 15, 1996
process is outlined in Appendix A of this report. Residents may not
petition for removal of curb and gutter in situations where curb and gutter
has been determined to be absolutely necessary, specifically when:
1. the grade of the street is one percent or less
2. the grade of the street is eight percent or greater
3. property abutting the street is below the elevation of the roadway
The above situations where curb and gutter is mandatory will often occur
adjacent to areas where curb is not mandatory. Strict adherence to these
criteria could result in situations where curb is intermittent on a roadway.
Therefore, when determining the extent of curb and gutter on each
project, each situation will be reviewed individually to ensure that
hardships and/or functional problems are not created.
Driveway Reconstruction
Contracts for street reconstruction will include contract unit prices for bituminous
and concrete driveway pavement. Residents along streets being reconstructed
will be given the option of having their driveways reconstructed at these contract
unit prices. If a resident elects to have his or her driveway reconstructed, staff
will measure the quantities installed. The cost of driveway reconstruction may
. then be paid in cash by the resident or added to the assessment against the
property.
Petitions for Reconstruction
Petitions for street reconstruction will continue to be accepted under the PMP.
However, priority will be given to petitions on streets projected for reconstruction
within five years of receipt. Petitions for street reconstruction must be received
by the City no later than August 1 of the year before reconstruction is desired.
Maintenance
Typically, streets that need reconstruction also need mainter7ance measures
beyond what is required for streets built to City standards. Those maintenance
measures must also be performed more frequently on poor streets, resulting in
an increasing burden on General Fund street maintenance and the need for
more taxes to finance them. Therefore, those streets recommended for
reconstruction consistent with the Pavement Management Policy but denied by
the City Council because of resident opposition will no longer be subject to
maintenance measures beyond those deemed necessary for public safety.
Maintenance measures required for public safety will include, but are not limited
to, repair of large potholes in the°driving lanes and patching of utility openings.
0
Resolution 96-96 - Continued October 15, 1996
Sidewalks
The construction of sidewalks will be evaluated for each street in keeping with
the goals of the Golden Valley Sidewalk Committee. Sidewalk 'I construction will
be financed by the City.
Concrete Streets
Some of Golden Valley's streets currently have concrete pavement. Concrete streets
can either be repaired or totally reconstructed, depending on the amount and types of
distresses present. As with bituminous roadways, staff will recommend rehabilitation
measures on concrete streets, giving priority to those with the lowest ratings. The
rehabilitation of concrete streets will be included in the yearly PMP funding.
Repair
Repair of concrete pavement consists of crack sawing, routing and sealing, shallow -
depth patching, full -depth patching, and panel replacement. In general, if more than
one-third of a block of concrete street requires panel replacement, repair is not cost-
effective and the street must be reconstructed.
Reconstruction
The cost of reconstructing a concrete street is approximately 49% higher than the cost
of a bituminous street. In addition, maintenance and rehabilitation of concrete streets is
also considerably more expensive than bituminous streets. Therefore, residents on
concrete streets will be given two options: Option 1 is to reconstruct the street as a
bituminous roadway, with an assessment consistent with the Spe ial Assessment
Policy. Option 2 is to reconstruct the street as a concrete roadway, wit an assessment
following the base unit assessment for a bituminous roadway plus 100% of the
increased costs resulting from constructing the street with concrete.
To reconstruct an existing concrete street as a new concrete street, a minimum of fifty-
one percent (51%) of the abutting property owners must sign a petition requesting the
concrete reconstruction. The petition form for a concrete street must b provided by the
City. No other petition form will be accepted.
Financing and Special Assessments
The City of Golden Valley Pavement Management Program is to be ,financed through
the general fund and general obligation bonds. The bonds will be repaid through tax
levies and special assessments. Sealcoating will be financed completely through the
general fund, with no assessments to adjacent properties. Bituminous overlays will be
contracted with the reconstruction portion of the program and will be financed through
bonding as funding allows. Special assessments will only be levied against those
properties adjacent to streets being reconstructed. The amount of the special
assessments will be set in the City's annual fee resolution based on to the Special
Assessment Policy.
•
Resolution 96-96 - Continued
ctober 15, 1996
Typical Yearly Project Schedule
The following schedule is typical for a specific project under the Pavement Management
Program:
June:
City staff makes recommendations to the City Council regarding proposed
reconstruction projects for the following year. The City Council reviews the
recommendations and orders feasibility reports for projects.
July through November.,
Staff begins preliminary surveying as time permits during construction season and
completes surveying in the fall. Staff also completes soil borings and televising of the
sanitary sewer.
September through December -
Begin preliminary design and hold neighborhood meetings.
December through January.
Continue preliminary design, incorporating comments from residents. Prepare feasibility
reports based on the preliminary design. Hold another round of neighborhood meetings
before the public hearings. Mail forms for curb and gutter petitions
Public hearings are also held during this time. The City Council will either order or deny
a project at the public hearing. The City Council will also authorize preparation of plans
and specifications and authorize bidding if the project is approved at the public hearing.
January through March:
Prepare final design and specifications. Staff reviews and revises plans (State Aid
review when needed).
March:
Advertise for bids.
April.
Bids are received and a contract is awarded by the City Council.
May though September -
Construction begins in May, with completion dates no later than September 30 on each
contract.
•
•
C
Resolution 96-96 - Continued October 15, 1996
Appendix A
Pavement Management Policy
Procedure for Petitioning for Street Improvements
Concrete curb and gutter will initially be proposed for all streets being considered for
reconstruction. However, with the exception of the conditions outlined within the
Pavement Management Policy, property owners will be given an opportunity to have
curb and gutter removed from the reconstruction plans. Property owners will be made
aware of this procedure, as outlined in this appendix.
The following procedure will be followed for petitioning to have concrete curb and gutter
removed from a project:
1. Project development will proceed through the public input and preliminary design
phases with concrete curb and gutter included in the design.
2. Property owners will be informed of their upcoming opportunity to petition to have
curb and gutter removed. Information will include discussion of the different
special assessment rates for reconstructed streets with and without curb and
gutter.
3. Approximately three weeks before the public hearing for each project, each
affected property owner will receive a postcard with the following', three options:
a) Reconstruct my street with curb and gutter.
b) Reconstruct my street without curb and gutter.
c) Don't reconstruct my street at this time.
4. Property owners will have one week to return the postcard.
5. A minimum of 75% of the affected property owners must petition', for the removal
of curb and gutter for it to be removed from the project.
6. Staff will tally the responses and present the information at the public hearing.
Resolution 96-96 - Continued
Pavement Management Program
1997 Proposed Schedule
October 15, 1996
August through November: Preliminary survey work, preliminary desig
November/December: Initial neighborhood meetings, resident participation, preliminary
design continues, begin preparing feasibility reports
January: Second neighborhood meetings, mail out petition
February: Public hearings
February through March: Final design and plan preparation
i il: Contract letting
is
is