The URL can be used to link to this page

10-21-08 agenda packet (entire) AGENDA Regular Meeting of the City Council Golden Valley City Hall 7800 Golden Valley Road Council Chamber October 21, 2008 6:30 p.m. The Council may consider item numbers 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 and 7 prior to the public hearings scheduled at 7:00 p.m. 1. CALL TO ORDER A. Roll Call B. Robbinsdale School District Referendum C. Proclamation For Community Mediation Services, Inc. 25th Anniversary D. Receipt of Community Partnership Grant - CenterPoint Energy 2. ADDITIONS AND CORRECTIONS TO AGENDA 3. CONSENT AGENDA Approval of Consent Agenda - All items listed under this heading are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no discussion of these items unless a Council Member or citizen so requests in which event the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda. A. Approval of Minutes - City Council Meeting - September 1, 2008 and Council/Manager Meeting - October 15, 2008 B. Approval of Check Registers: 1. City 2. Housing and Redevelopment Authority C. Licenses: 1. Solicitor's License - Window Concepts of MN Inc. 2. Solicitor's License - Clean Water Action D. Minutes of Boards and Commissions: 1. Human Services Foundation - September 8, 2008 2. Joint Water Commission - August 5, 2008 3. Envision Connection Project Board of Directors - September 18, 2008 4. Bassett Creek Water Management Commission - August 21,2008 E. Requesting Additional Time to Complete Comprehensive Plan Decennial Review Obligations 08-46 F. Waiver of Public Hearing and Certification of Special Assessments: 1. 2008(A) Pavement Management Program Driveways 8-47 G. Adoption of Identity Theft Prevention Program H. Authorize Participation in Hennepin County Environmental Response Fund Application Process for Twin Lake Regional Storm Water Pond 08-48 I. Reset City Council Meeting Date J. Set Date for Special Council/Manager Meeting 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS 7:00 PM A. Public Hearing - Preliminary Plat Approval - 1825 Quail Avenue North - Quail Woods Peter Knaeble (Golden Valley Land Co.), Applicant B. Public Hearing - Special Assessments: 1. 2008 Pavement Management Program 08-49 2. 2009 Pavement Management Program 08-50 5. OLD BUSINESS 6. NEW BUSINESS A. Announcements of Meetings B. Mayor and Council Communications 7. ADJOURNMENT alley Mem d m City Administration/Council 763-593-8003/763-593-8109 (fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting October 21, 2008 Agenda Item 1. B. Robbinsdale School District Referendum Prepared By Thomas D. Burt, City Manager Summary YES281 Co-Chair Jennifer Griffin-Wiesner will attend the meeting to review the school referendum and answer questions from the Council. t alley M m City Administration/Council 763-593-8003 I 763-593-8109 (fax) Executive Summai)f For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting October 21, 2008 Agenda Item 1. C. Proclamation For Community Mediation Services, Inc. 25th Anniversary ! Prepared By Thomas D. Burt, City Manager. Summary Jeff Karatz and Jennifer Peterson, Volunteer Mediators and Golden Valley residents will attend the meeting and make a brief presentation on the services they provide. Attachments Proclamation For Community Mediation Services, Inc. 25th Anniversary (1 page) Community Mediation Services, Inc. brochure (1 page, loose in agenda packet) Community Mediation Services, Inc. 2007 Annual Report (1 page, loose in agenda packet) Recommended Action Motion to adopt Proclamation For Community Mediation Services, Inc. 25th Anniversary. Mayor Loomis will present the Proclamation For Community Mediation Services, Inc. 25th Anniversary. CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY PROCLAMATION FOR COMMUNITY MEDIATION SERVICES, INC. 25TH ANNIVERSARY WHEREAS, throughout 2008 Community Mediation Services, Inc. is celebrating its 25th Anniversary; and WHEREAS, since 1983, Community Mediation Services, Inc. has been an asset to the community by providing the inspiration and tools to resolve conflict respectfully and effectively through voluntary mediation services; and WHEREAS, Community Mediation Services, Inc. provides services to and through the local community by utilizing dedicated and trained community volunteers as mediators; and WHEREAS, Community Mediation Services, Inc. is a non-profit community resource governed by community residents and operating with financial support from state, local, and private sources; and WHEREAS, Since 1983 Community Mediation Services, Inc. has provided over 18,000 mediations and trained over 250 community mediators; NOW, THEREFORE, let it be known, that the Mayor and City Council of the City of Golden Valley hereby recognize the 25th Anniversary of Community Mediation Services, Inc. and ask all to join in celebrating this auspicious occasion. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the great seal of the City of Golden Valley to be affixed this 21st day of October, 2008. Linda R. Loomis, Mayor ~lley o ndu Fire Department 763-593-8079 I 763-593-8098 (fax) Executive Summary for Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting October 21, 2008 Agenda Item 1. D. Receipt of Community Partnership Grant from CenterPoint Energy Prepared By Mark Kuhnly, Chief of Fire & Inspections Summary The Golden Valley Fire Department made application for a $600 Community Partnership Grant offered by CenterPoint Energy. The grant will be used toward the purchase of extrication/stabilization equipment. The equipment will be used by first responders to stabilize a vehicle during extrication. Recommended Action Motion to accept the $600 Community Partnership Grant from CenterPoint Energy to be used toward the purchase of extrication/stabilization equipment. alley 1 o m Finance 763-593-8013/763-593-8109 (fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting October 21, 2008 Agenda Item 3. B. 1. Approval of City Check Register Prepared By Sue Virnig, Finance Director Summary Approval of check register for various vendor claims against the City of Golden Valley. Attachments Loose in agenda packet. Recommended Action Motion to authorize the payment of the bills as submitted. alley Memo n u Finance 763-593-8013/763-593-8109 (fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting October 21, 2008 Agenda Item 3. B. 2. Approval of Housing and Redevelopment Authority Check Register Prepared By Sue Virnig, Finance Director Summary Approval of check register for various vendor claims against the Housing and Redevelopment Authority. Attachments Loose in agenda packet. Recommended Action Motion to authorize the payment of the bills as submitted. alley morandum City Administration/Council 763-593-8002/763-593-8109 (fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting October 21, 2008 Agenda Item 3. C. 1. Solicitor's License - Window Concepts of MN Inc. Prepared By Christine Columbus, Administrative Assistant Summary As per City Code, any individual or group intending to go door-to-door within the City selling products, taking orders or soliciting for business or donations must be licensed by the City to do so. Attachments Peddler/Solicitor License Application (2 pages) Recommended Action Motion to approve the solicitor's license for Window Concepts of MN Inc. 'From:CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY 783 583 8109 10/08/2008 13:54 .931 P.004/005 '~ "j Application and fee must be submitted to the City Manager's OffIce the Wednesday prior- to the City Council Meeting. Council Meetings are normally held the first and third Tuesday of each month. PEDDLER/SOLICITOR LICENSE APPLICATION . TO: Golden Valley City Council Fee Paid: $ 5~ 7800 Golden Valley Road Number. of Persons: I \ Golden Valley, MN 55427 Type of License Requested: ~ \l~lfar Enclose the sum of $ 5006 for l \ (number) peddlers/solicitors as required by City Code of the City of Golden Valley and have complied with_all the requirements of said Code necessary for obtaining this license. (B~~~~Su1':a:~ ~nmfJIi}~- ~.~~~te~;&~oil(q ~,/f)1V6S1?1 (p=; I-Cf(J ~-O/c:?~ (Telephone Number, including Area Code) NOW, THEREFORE, /Hd'~C; ~~ - _ hereby makes application for the (Applicant Name) period of J Dj~(i(through 6/301.o1l, subject to the conditions and provisions of said City Code. -- ~ :! U (Signature of Applicant/Principal Officer) l,_.c,......-"'llllcatIOnJ REQUIRED LICENSE INFORMATION Applicant (if different from above): Name ~~ /k3c-J Address 3~SCj ~~l!~cjud1~t~~~~~,~()J/LJ~$JCI Telephone Number (including area Cod. oj. 't}jPff!:fI-f-II-f'-t7 Date of Birth (if an individual) l '7_ I~__ _ Business Name of Applicant '.A//"ola>w ~nc.f~r ~sr m AJ -::r/1 c!... - Address cr% / ~/J2!-~ Rri. S-4e.)/h'~~ ,/lJ/lJ <<tZ/ (Include City, stat~ and Zip de).' Define Business .J- (Corp ration, Proprietorship, paqnership, etc.; State of Incorporation) Description of goods or services for sale (include prices) or indicate if soliciting donations~re space is needed, attach additional sheets (be specific): ~. f !oJ, -In (\ar)~.s.q .-r -io ot:v/ io~~(lkdak-cyfPMf~i?~~ J1o~IJ:3o:J-l{)/I- ...... ~ e/)~~ 0 rs; s. ~-wer jJ.~ t NOTE: -Iffhe prod ts for-sale are ooanged or modified, you must gl;' the City information regarding such change or modification. tS/ I~s<tca..../ ~'" From:CITV OF GOLDEN VALLEV 763 593 8109 10/08/2008 13:54 1931 P.005/005 If the Peddler or Solicitor is so engaged on behalf of an organization, supply: Telephone Number (Including Area Code) <.:0 ~ 1-c::rC;:;-O IDS Define Business (Co oration, Proprietorship, Partnership, etc.; State of Incorporation) (If more space is needed, attach additional sheets) . STATE OF t1Ii'ntle.S'at\-o- ) on .(;le-l~ yY\al1~~e(,f offzue.., ) S8. COUNTY OF ~~ ) I, -r-htt:1Jl'??t:::L ~ ~ (Officer/lndMdual) of \AJ"l'JrJ~~LI ~n(\~i5 o~m~~ (Name of Organiz tion) being first duly swom, depose and say that all the foregoinginfonnation is true to hislher own knowledge except as to matters ther~in stated on information and belief, and as to such matters, he/she believes them to be true. (S:aJure ; ~~cipal Offlce~ ~.. 20~. G~EGORY,jRAMELJR My~rt;ili PUBLIC --MINNESOTA DMMISSlON EXPIRES 1-31-2010 ~ alley Memorand m City Administration/Council 763-593-8002/763-593-8109 (fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting October 21, 2008 Agenda Item 3. C. 2. Solicitor's License - Clean Water Action Prepared By Christine Columbus, Administrative Assistant Summary As per City Code, any individual or group intending to go door-to-door within the City selling products, taking orders or soliciting for business or donations must be licensed by the City to do so. Attachments Peddler/Solicitor License Application (2 pages) Recommended Action Motion to approve the solicitor's license for Clean Water Action. 'I ., Application and fee must be submitted to the City Manager's Office the Wednesday prior to the City Council Meeting. Council Meetings are normally held the first and third Tuesday of each month. PEDDLER/SOLICITOR LICENSE APPLICATION C:'110 tJ TO: Golden Valley City Council Fee Paid: $ UU C'?-I- 7800 Golden Valley Road Number. of Persons: c~ '0 ~. ..../- Golden Valley, MN 55427 Type of License Requested: sobel! ~OD Enclose the sum of $~ for - (number) peddlers/solicitors as required by City Code of the City of Golden Valley and have complied with all the requirements of said Code necessary for obtaining this license. Ol.e2V'\ We-\-e.\r Ae-t\oVl (Business or Individual Name to be Licensed) ~O ~ f-. He.lAY\qi..A kv fL- tv'\~p\s} M.N S'SY \ I..::f . (Address, including City, State and Zip Code) ltJld--lao-~- 3lP{Q4' (Telephone Number, including Area Code) NOW, THEREFORE, "ic.-tcNi a L.e-Pa~ e..- hereby makes application for the I f) sll'/ (Applicant Nam period of \0 I ~~hrOugh 6/30/llL, subject to the conditions and provisions of said City Code. ~~ incipal Officer) REQUIRED LICENSE INFORMATION Applicant (if differ~nt frorp aboye2: 7'\ Name \J\cAotic Ul-t'~ e.. Address \.all M..6V\vo.e st. Nt:. 1\ S tv'lr\s, MN c;~4\ 13 (Include City, State and Zip Code) Telephone Number (including area code) LQ <51 - 141- 1343> (. c -ell) Date of Birth (if an individual) to - -;} - ~ & Business Name of Applicant Address (Include City, State and Zip Code) '^ V'OVl 'ML-V\ \ a' (jV aw 1.2 tibV\ (Corpo ation, Proprietorship, Partnership, etc.; Sta of Incorporation) Description of goods or services for sale (include prices) or indicate if soliciting donations. If more space is needed, attach additional sheets (be specific): \rLO S ~ (I' ~ - .J2..V)\t\rtl\r\ \N\QVl \cl1 i Ssu.~S - .c:;n;~1u-\re~} Jvv,~1itJY\s.) t~\\-eV-.s ~ e(~vk-d [)fB'GicJ~ Define Business NOTE: If the products for sale are changed or modified, you must give the City complete information regarding such change or modification. ,r If the Peddler or Solicitor is so engaged on behalf of an organization, supply: Name of Organization ~eah Wate-\f" 4t1DV'\ 3o<i)c" l+G\t1~iV\ N~ Mpl':>) f..A~ S~ (Include City, Sta e and Zip Code) Address of Organization Tel~hone Number (InCludine, Area Code) Id-- (orl--~- 3{a(Q Define Business List the names and addresses of EACH person who will be peddling or soliciting on behalf of said organization in the City, or, in the alternative, the name, address arid telephone number or numbers where a responsible person of said organization will maintain a list of names and ,addresse of aU per-sons enga ed in peddling or soliciting i~ the City: See ~ ....e-. l f ' , , a Dft h(f I~ fha IlCt5-fi'S (}ffz{L (If more space is needed, attach additional sheets) STATE OF rhn~N'iSD1t) COUNTY OF ~~ffnJ? 55. I, \I \c.-iluYld LL\)a~ (Officerllndivl al) of CA~~V1 W a1<-v- AuD~V\ (Name of Organization) being first duly sworn, depose and say that all the foregoing information is true to his/her own knowledge except as to matters therein stated on information and belief, and as to such matters, he/she believes them to be true. Q-\~ ~ (Signat"r of Appli pr alpalOfficer) JUDITH A. NALLY NOTARY PUBLIC - MINNESOTA My Commission Expires Jan. 31,2010 Golden Valley Human Services Foundation (GVHSF) Meeting Minutes September 8, 2008 Present: Daniel Blumb, Elissa Heilicher, Gloria Johnson, Chris Monroe, Diane Nimmer, Connie Sandler, and Steve Schumacher. Also present Jeanne Fackler, Staff Liaison. Not Present: Shannon Breimhurst, Hilmer Erickson, Teri Holgate, Bob Hoyt and Toots Vodovoz. Call to Order: Chairperson Blumb called the meeting to order at 6: 15 p.m. August 11 minutes: Monroe moved and Heilicher seconded the motion to approve the minutes of August 11. The motion passed unanimously. Golf Tournament: Heilicher has contacted Crossroad's Deli and Piazza's. Volunteer positions were discussed. Everything is ready for Friday. New Business: Taste of Golden Valley: Monroe reported that there are 48 restaurants in Golden Valley. Letters will be sent this week asking for participation. Doolittle's has committed to the event. Sandler has offered to speak at the city commission meetings urging their support of the event. Nimmer has contacted John Ewald, StarTribune columnist, who will attend. Nimmer is meeting with Nina Cook, host of Seniors on Screen" to promote the event. It was suggested to give each participating restaurant a plaque as a thank you for participating. Fackler will contact Town Crier Promotions for a price. Sponsorship packet/brochure: Nimmer reported that the committee is gathering information on the HSF events and sponsor opportunities. They will meet with the Communications Department in the near future. Old Business: By-laws review: The Council discussed the by-law change. At this time, the recommendation is to leave the by-laws as is. Presentations: The Commission listened to presentations and requests for funding from ten agencies: Northwest Suburban Dinner At Your Door - requesting $5,000 Tree House - requesting $7,500 Right to Live USA - requesting $6,800 Greater Minneapolis Crisis Nursery - requesting $10,000 The Bridge for Youth - requesting $5,000 Senior Community Services HOME - requesting $6,000 Senior Community Services Outreach - requesting $3,000 Home Free Shelter - requesting $2,500 Community Mediation Services - requesting $4,000 Crisis Connection - requesting $3,000 Neighborhood Involvement Program - requesting $3,000 Commission members felt it was very beneficial to hear the presentations and ask questions. Human Services Foundation September 8, 2008 Page 2 October meeting: Blumb reminded members that the October meeting has been changed to October 6th. It is important for all members to attend as allocation requests will be discussed. Adjournment: Nimmer moved to adjourn the meeting, Sandler seconded the motion. The meeting was adjourned at 10:00 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Jeanne Fackler GVHSF Staff Liaison JOINT WATER COMMISSION MINUTES Golden Valley - Crystal - New Hope Meeting of August 5, 2008 The Golden Valley - Crystal - New Hope Joint Water Commission meeting was called to order at 8:30 am, in the City of Golden Valley Council Conference Room. Commissioners Present Tom Burt, City Manager, Golden Valley Kirk McDonald, City Manager, New Hope Anne Norris, City Manager, Crystal Staff Present Guy Johnson, Public Works Director, New Hope Paul Coone, Operations Manager, New Hope Bernie Weber, Utility Maintenance Supervisor, New Hope Tom Mathisen, Public Works Director, Crystal Randy Kloepper, Utility Maintenance Supervisor, Crystal Bert Tracy, Utility Maintenance Supervisor, Golden Valley Dave Lemke, Utility Maintenance Supervisor, Golden Valley Sue Virnig, Finance Director, Golden Valley Other Scott Harder, Environmental Financial Group (EFG) Approval of JWC Minutes MOVED by Norris seconded by Burt and motion carried unanimously to approve the minutes of the July 2,2008 meeting. Draft Water Plan Scott Harder commented on the proposed Water Supply Plan stating there was some disconnect between the Joint Water Commission and the Emergency Water Supply Plan because there was no discussion of water supply planning concerning weather, Met Council and DNR. He stated that the Water Supply Plan will be complete in the next couple of weeks and is adequate to submit with the Comprehensive Plan. He also has been working with Golden Valley on their portion of the Comprehensive Plan. Emergency Supply Study Scott Harder spoke of the agreement with TAC with regards to emergency water storage and possibly using the New Hope well and the General Mills Ford Bell well as an emergency water supply. Harder stated a brief letter was sent informing General Mills of plans and dates of implementation. Barr Engineering will begin to review well sites after Labor Day. A meeting will be set with TAC and the next step will be to Start Phase II. Joint Water Commission August 5,2008 Page 2 Minneapolis Rates The JWC agreement with the City of Minneapolis, spelled out what should and shouldn't be included in the formula to determine new rates. Scott Harder looked briefly at the proposed rates and determined that principal, interest and debt where erroneously factored into the rates. Scott will mention the agreement and ask that the draft of Minneapolis water rates be recalculated in accordance with the previously signed agreement. The proposed rates from Minneapolis would be a 16% increase in wholesale water rates. 2008 Annual Financial Report Sue Virnig reviewed the audit with Commissioners stating the audits went well with only one comment in regards to review of accounts payable. The fund balance is $641,000 which is not enough to cover the June water bill so each city will be billed a deposit and will be reimbursed by year-end. MOVED by Norris, seconded by McDonald and motion carried unanimously to receive and file the 2008 annual financial report. Other Governors Monthly Meetinas Scott Harder mentioned that the committee is writing the plan as they go and seemed to be struggling writing the principals. The committee will be looking for ways to secure a funding source. The money will be used for ground water modeling, etc. Council Advisory Committee Tom Mathisen relayed that testing continuation for utility employees will be at Crystal Community Center. Crystal will be spending 2.2 million to replace water meters with radio reads that can be taken from their office. Crystal will be implementing a city-wide sump pump inspection program. Discussions on level of containments measuring, Columbia sand plant, Fridley re-designed plant with completion scheduled in 2012, the EPA testing of clams, and the lining of pipes. Valve Exerciser Bert Tracy confirmed the valve exerciser will be arriving soon. Joint Water Commission August 5, 2008 Page 3 Next Meeting The next meeting will be September 3, 2008. Adiournment The meeting was adjourned at 9:15 am. ATTEST: Christine Columbus, Administrative Assistant Thomas D. Burt, Chair Envision Connection Project Board of Directors Meeting Minutes September 18,2008 Present: Sharon Glover, Helene Johnson, Linda Loomis, Philip Lund, Marshall Tanick, Blair Tremere and Luke Weisberg (GVCEF Representative) Absent: Jim Heidelberg and Dean Penk, Staff: Jeanne Andre The meeting began at 7:17 pm in the Council Conference Room. Approval of Minutes Tremere/Lund moved to approve the minutes of August 21,2008, as presented. Motion carried. Golden Valley Connects Outreach. Ice Cream Social - Jeanne Andre prepared a summary of the evaluation of the Ice Cream Social discussed at the August meeting. Speaker in a Box - This work will be postponed, perhaps until the relationship with the Golden Valley Community Events Fund is determined. Bridge Building Activities Quarterlv Meetings - The next quarterly meeting will be on Saturday, November 22, from 10 am to noon at the Vikings Boy Scout Council on Glenwood Avenue. A Boy Scout representative will give a presentation at the end of the meeting. The group also discussed having a future Bridge Builder Meeting focused on Golden Valley demographics and planning for the future of the community. Lilac Planting - Training for Team Leaders occurred on Monday, September 15. Some Hennepin County Master Gardeners have volunteered to be team leaders. The event will be on Saturday, October 4, with general volunteers arriving at 9 am. It appears there are at least 50 volunteers, including youth (Boy Scouts, soccer players and perhaps some Perpich Arts High School Students). Blair Tremere is working on securing food donations. He has granola bars from General Mills and cookies and water from Byerly's. He is also looking for coffee and sandwiches. Linda Loomis will visit with various commissions to invite them to participate. KARE-11 TV and Cable 12 are both planning to promote the event. General Mills will also promote the event as a volunteer opportunity for its employees. Joint Fundraising with GVCEF - Luke Weisberg reported that he is working with Dean Penk and Don Keysser on developing a draft agreement for consideration by this Board and the Golden Valley Community Events Fund (GVCEF) Board. At this point he is recommending that the GVCEF serve as fiscal agent for the Connection Project. The Connection Project Board would develop an annual work plan and the two groups would collaboratively undertake fund raising to support the Golden Valley Festival and the Envision Connection Project Board of Directors Meeting Minutes September 18, 2008 - Page 2 activities identified in the work plan. There would be two separate activity accounts under the GVCEF umbrella. In addition, GVCEF would seek to broaden the membership on its board. Dean Penk and Philip Lund may join the GVCEF Board. Luke Weisberg anticipates that there will be a draft agreement for discussion at the next meeting. Community Awards The draft proposal on community awards will be on the October Council/Manager Meeting. Helene Johnson will attend to provide an overview of the proposal. The group further discussed possible names for the award. The members agreed to forward possible names to Helene in the next week. Recruitment of Members to the Executive Board Blair Tremere reported that General Mills is willing to list Connection Project Board Membership as a volunteer opportunity for its employees. He asked if the Board is receptive to having members from the business community that may not live in Golden Valley. The Board suggested broad membership is in keeping with Envision. Future Meetings The next meeting is October 16. The meeting ended at 8:25 pm. Jeanne Andre Assistant City Manager Bassett Creek Watershed Management Minutes of t 21, 2008 1 Call to Order The Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission (BCWMC) was called to order at 11:40 a.m., Thursday, August 21, 2008, at Golden Valley City Hall by Chair Welch. Ms. Herbert conducted roll call. Roll Call Crystal Golden Valley Medicine Lake Minneapolis Minnetonka New Hope Plymouth Robbinsdale St. Louis Park Commissioner Pauline Langsdorf Commissioner Linda Loomis, Treasurer Commissioner Cheri Templeman Commissioner Michael Welch, Chair Commissioner Kris Sundberg Commissioner Daniel Stauner Commissioner Ginny Black, Vice Chair Not represented Alternate Commissioner Sue Sanger Counsel Engineer Recorder Charlie LeFevere Karen Chandler Amy Herbert Note: Robbinsdale Commissioner Karla Peterson arrived after roll call Also present: Laura Adler, BCWMC Technical Advisory Committee, City of St. Louis Park Brooke Asleson, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Jack Frost, Metropolitan Council Environmental Services Hans Holmberg, LimnoTech Randy Lehr, Three Rivers Park District Al Lundstrom, BCWMC Technical Advisory Committee, City of Golden Valley Tom Mathisen, BCWMC Technical Advisory Committee, City of Crystal Bob Moberg, BCWMC Technical Advisory Committee, City of Plymouth Jeff Oliver, BCWMC Technical Advisory Committee, City of Golden Valley Brian Ross, CR Planning Stu Stockhaus, Alternate Commissioner, City of Crystal Liz Stout, BCWMC Technical Advisory Committee, City of Minnetonka Elizabeth Thornton, Alternate Commissioner, City of Plymouth 2. Approval of Agenda and Consent Agenda Chair Welch corrected the address on listed on the agenda for item SA to read 1240 Angelo Drive. He announced that agenda item 6D - Resource Management Plan - would be addressed last; he added to the agenda a discussion of the Pilgrim Lane Elementary Education Grant Reimbursement Request and he stated that agenda item 6A - Plymouth Creek Feasibility Study - would be addressed prior to item SB - Ad Valorem Tax Request to Hennepin County. Ms. Black moved to approve the agenda as amended. Ms. Loomis seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously [City of Robbinsdale absent from the vote]. Ms. Loomis moved to approve the Consent Agenda. Ms. Black seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously [City of Robbinsdale absent from the vote]. #248959 vI Page 1 BCWMC August 21, 2008, Meeting Minutes 3. Citizen Input on Non-Agenda Items Mr. Frost announced that there is a Lake Pepin TMDL conference in Mankato on September 23rd and 24th. 4. Administration A. Presentation of the July 17,2008, BCWMC meeting minutes. The July 17,2008, meeting minutes were approved as part of the Consent Agenda. B. Presentation of the Financial Statement. The general and construction account balances reported in the August 2008 Financial Report are as follows: Checking Account Balance TOTAL GENERAL FUND BALANCE 509,099.53 509,099.53 Construction Account Balance (cash) Investment Balance TOTAL CONSTRUCTION ACCOUNT BALANCE -Less: Reserved for CIP projects Construction cash/ investments available for projects 2,500,537.58 0.00 2,500,537.58 3,748,708.17 (1,248,170.59) C. Presentation of Invoices for Payment Approval. Invoices: i. Kennedy & Graven - Legal Services through July 25, 2008 - invoice for the amount of $1,010.90. ii. Barr Engineering Company - July Engineering Services. invoice for the amount of $29,413.74. iii. Barr Engineering Company - Sweeney Lake TMDL Services May 31 - August 1, 2008 . invoice for the amount of $914.11. iv. Amy Herbert - July Recording Administrator Services. invoice for the amount of $2,360.05. v. SEH, Inc. - Sweeney Lake TMDL Study Phase 2 Services through June 30, 2008 - invoice for the amount of $1,065.00. vi. City of Golden Valley - Reimbursement for Sweeney Lake Branch Channel Maintenance - invoice for the amount of $83,734.35. Ms. Black moved to approve payment of all invoices. Ms. Loomis seconded the motion. By call of roll, the motion carried unanimously [City of Robbinsdale absent from the vote]. #248959 v 1 BCWMC August 21, 2008, Meeting Minutes Page 2 5. New Business A. 1240 Angelo Drive: Golden Valley Trail Phase 2. Ms. Chandler explained that the property is located directly on the west shore of Sweeney Lake and that the project is in front of the Commission because the second and final phase of the project consists of work in the floodplain. She stated that the work comprises the removal of an existing limestone wall and an old boathouse foundation and other debris along 122 feet of the shoreline. Ms. Chandler explained that the shoreline wiH be restored with limestone riprap and native plants. She reported that the three conditions listed in the August 12, 2008, Engineer's Memo have been met and that the Commission Engineer recommends approval of the project. Chair Welch asked if there is a silt fence installed at the project site and if it would manage erosion properly and if anyone is inspecting the site. Ms. Chandler said the silt fence is there and hay bales are reinforcing the fencing. Mr. Lundstrom said the City of Golden VaHey has been visiting the project site. Chair Welch suggested the Commission consider during its Third Generation Plan process discussing rip rap and shoreline stabilization requirements. Ms. Black moved to approve the project. Ms. Sundberg seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously. [Commissioner Peterson arrives]. 6. Old Business A. Plymouth Creek Feasibility Study. Ms. Chandler mentioned that the nine Commissioners were mailed a hard copy of the study in the mail and that the entire Commission was sent an electronic copy. She explained this project was included in the BCWMC's CIP for construction in 2009. She said the project is for the reach of Plymouth Creek that from upstream of 26th A venue down to the park by Medicine Lake. Ms. Chandler said that within that reach there are a lot of erosion and sedimentation problems. She said the City of Plymouth of is interested in rerouting a portion of the creek to restore it to a more natural configuration. Ms. Chandler said that because of the large amount of work that needs to be done for the project and because a lot of the project will take place on private property, the City of Plymouth decided it needs more time to go through the public process and would like the project to be delayed one year for construction in 2010. Chair Welch said the Commission would have needed to order the project and have held the public hearing in order to levy for the project this year for collection in 2009. He said the need for wetland mitigation on the project is unknown and commented that the easements for private property can be a big deal. Mr. Moberg said the City of Plymouth would like the West Medicine Lake Park Pond project completed prior to starting the Plymouth Creek project. He said the City is moving forward with plans to replace all the culverts under 26th A venue and that project won't be completed until 2009 or 2010. He commented that the City also needs time for extensive public participation and for working on easement issues. Mr. Moberg remarked that the project has been identified as a component of the BCWMC's resource management plan and the City wants to make sure the project goes through the Army Corps of Engineer's process. Ms. Chandler commented that Figure 10 in the project's feasibility report provides a project timeline. Ms. Black asked if the Commission would want this project and the feasibility study to be discussed again in January 2009? The Commission concurred. Chair Welch said Mr. Moberg will update the Commission on the public process and the EA W status. Chair Welch directed the TAC #248959 vI BCWMC August 21, 2008, Meeting Minutes Page 3 to discuss the Plymouth Creek project as part of the TAC's January CIP review. Ms. Langsdorf mentioned that the figures in the feasibility report are great resources and should be provided to the alternate commissioners. Chair Welch directed Ms. Herbert to send a CD-ROM of the feasibility report to the alternate commissioners and the TAC members. Ms. Chandler stated that the project cost listed in the feasibility report is greater than the cost listed in the CIP table because originally the stream relocation was not part of the project and the cost of easement acquisition was not in the original estimate. She reminded the Commission that the TAC has since recommended that feasibility reports include acquisition costs. 5. New Business B. 2009 Ad Valorem Tax Request to Hennepin County. Chair Welch reminded the Commission that the tax levy request to the County is a request for funding of the BCWMC's capital projects. He said the Commission needs to determine whether or not it wants to include in the levy request the additional $200,000 for wetland mitigation for the West Medicine Lake Park Pond project. Chair Welch reminded the Commission that in the past the Commission has not paid for this kind of project-related cost. Chair Welch said the TAC had discussed whether the Commission should develop a policy for handling land-related costs such as for easements and for wetland mitigation. He stated that the TAC recommended the Commission make decisions on a case by case basis for now. Mr. LeFevere explained that no plan amendment is required if a project cost is adjusted within certain limits. He said the original project cost can be increased by up to 20% in accordance to the Construction Cost Index. He said that for this project the levy could be adjusted up to approximately $1,164,000 without a plan amendment. Mr. LeFevere said the wetland mitigation cost was not included in the feasibility report and the report stated that those costs were unknown at the time of the report. Ms. Sanger asked if the BCWMC doesn't pay for the wetland mitigation, then who will? Chair Welch said the City would pay the cost. Chair Welch commented that the Commission hasn't heard from the TAC about this project specifically. Mr. LeFevere stated that the tax certification is due to the County before October 1st so the Commission has time to act on the levy at the September meeting. Mr. Mathisen said the Commission needs to have a policy on what is and what is not land acquisition. Ms. Black said this particular project would likely be a significant piece of the Medicine Lake TMDL study and wondered if that consideration needs to be evaluated. Ms. Loomis said if the Commission gets into land acquisition then at what point does the Commission stop? Mr. LeFevere said if the project winds up helping a city with its load allocation then the city could agree to share the costs of the land acquisition, which may be the cheapest way for the city to meet its load allocation. Chair Welch commented that the Commission should consider the Commission's involvement in these types of projects. He said the Commission is largely a funding source and doesn't have much say in how the projects are conducted. Mr. Mathisen remarked that the WMOs having been telling the MPCA that the WMOs want to decide how to divide the load allocations so that the allocations don't necessarily need to be divided #248959 vI BCWMC August 21, 2008, Meeting Minutes Page 4 on a city by city basis. He stated that the Shingle Creek Watershed Management Commission doesn't pay for land acquisition and only pays 25% of project costs and the projects stilI get done. Mr. Stauner requested that the feasibility report for this project be resent to the Commission. Ms. Peterson said she would like the TAC to provide the Commission with a few different options that it could discuss at the next meeting. Ms. Black requested historical information on land acquisition in the BCWMC's land acquisition projects. Chair Welch asked Ms. Chandler if Barr could prepare such information, not including the flood control projects. Ms. Chandler said yes. Ms. Sanger asked if the Commission and the T A C should take into consideration the levy limits on the cities. Ms. Black remarked that cities do have other vehicles besides property tax for raising those funds. Chair Welch moved to send the issue to the TAC for its recommendation on whether the wetland mitigation costs for this project should be included in the ad valorem levy for 2009. Ms. Loomis seconded the motion. 6. Old Business B. Golden Valley Surface Water Management Plan. Ms. Loomis moved to direct Commission Counsel to prepare the resolution to approve Golden Valley's surface water management plan. Ms. Black seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously. C. Minnetonka Surface Water Management Plan. Ms. Loomis moved to approve Minnetonka's surface water management plan, to direct Commission Counsel to prepare the resolution to approve the plan, and to refer to the TAC the issue raised by Minnetonka regarding the changed flood plain elevation for Crane Lake. Ms. Black seconded the motion. Mr. LeFevere commented that the resolution would clarify that at this time the Commission has not adopted the changed flood plain elevation for Crane Lake. The motion carried with eight votes in favor [Crystal, Golden Valley, Minneapolis, Minnetonka, New Hope, Plymouth, Robbinsdale, and St. Louis Park] and one vote against [Medicine Lake]. D. Medicine Lake TMDL Study Update. Chair Welch stated that a final Medicine Lake TMDL Study work plan was e-mailed to the BCWMC [on August 12,2008] from Brooke Asleson of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and stated that Ms. Asleson also e-mailed the BCWMC [on August 12, 2008] a memo with a Medicine Lake TMDL Study update. Chair Welch said that a memo dated August 20, 2008, from Barr Engineering was e-mailed today to the BCWMC. He said the memo raises a couple of issues for points of clarification and the Commission Engineer is recommending that the Commission discuss the points with the Medicine Lake TMDL team. Chair Welch welcomed to the meeting Hans Holmberg of LimnoTech, Brian Ross of CR Planning, and Randy Lehr of Three Rivers Park District in addition to Brooke Asleson of the MPCA, who are all part of the Medicine Lake TMDL Study. Ms. Asleson discussed her memo about the Medicine Lake TMDL project update. She said that all three contracts for the project's separate components are in place. She said the Three Rivers Park District started work on July 1, 2008, on project task 1. She said that the contract with LimnoTech was signed on July 2, 2008, and that she and Brian Ross have held one meeting so far. Ms. Asleson said that on August 19, 2008, the contract with CR Planning was signed and said that the stakeholder process would begin soon. She said the detailed work plan and the budget were included in her August 12, 2008 e-mailed communications to the Commission for its review. She said she would be happy to answer any questions the Commission has about the work plan or the budget. #248959 vI BCWMC August 21, 2008, Meeting Minutes Page 5 Ms. Asleson said that as the project moves forward, to ensure that the three-way partnership that has been established with the Three Rivers Park District, the BCWMC, and the MPCA is productive and that the partners can continue to work together in an effective way, she would like to set out some conditions for the partners to agree upon so that the partners hopefully could all move forward in a productive manner. Ms. Asleson said the first condition she requests from the Commission is that the Commission speaks in one unified voice and that any internal differences or conflicts be worked out prior to communication with her regarding the project. She said this would help her spend her time most effectively on managing more of the details of the project. Ms. Asleson said her second condition is to have the Commission's support and assurance as the project moves forward. She said she wants to make sure everyone is comfortable with how issues are addressed as the project move forward and that she needs the Commission's assurance and support in her leadership role of the project. She said her third request is that the Commission is respectful of her time and that when there are issues and concerns that need to be dealt with that they are actually a project requirement and are necessary and critical in order to move the project forward. Ms. Asleson said that she is looking for the Commission to agree to those terms of the relationship. She said that a verbal agreement would work for her or that a more formal agreement could be arranged. Chair Welch responded that he can't see putting those terms into a formal agreement because in a practical sense what would be the consequences of not following the agreement. He explained that as the Chair of the BCWMC he has made clear his request to the Commission members that in all of their communications they treat each other respectfully and his expectation in the Medicine Lake TMDL Study project isn't any different. Chair Welch commented that he doesn't foresee this project would suddenly get easy from here on out. He said the project is a public process and it can be ugly sometimes. He said he is personally comfortable making a commitment to Ms. Asleson to maintain a respectful environment and interplay. Chair Welch said the project has evolved to a point where the Commission Engineer is in the singular role of advising the Commission instead of playing multiple roles in the project. He said the official communications on the project will come from the Commission and although he can't promise unity between the Commission members, communications will be taken through the process the Commission takes all of its business and the Commission will come back to Ms. Asleson with consistent feedback the best it possibly can. Ms. Asleson asked if Chair Welch would be the one delivering all of the Commission communications to her regarding the project. Chair Welch responded that he would not necessarily always be the one to deliver the communications. He said the Commission may authorize someone else to communicate with her and he does not want to commit to being the one to always to communicate with her. Ms. Peterson said if Ms. Asleson at any points needs clarification whether a certain communication is from the Commission that she can ask for that clarification from the Commission through Chair Welch. Mayor Loomis said the Commission has one voice once it has made a decision and if Ms. Asleson is hearing from individual commissioners then Ms. Asleson can ask whether that person is speaking on behalf of him- or herself or on behalf of the Commission. Ms. Asleson said she is looking for considerable involvement from the Commission in the stakeholder process and wants to know who she should contact in that regard. Ms. Asleson asked the Commission to provide her with a list of people who would potentially be interested in #248959 vI BCWMC August 21, 2008, Meeting Minutes Page 6 participating in the stakeholder group. Chair Welch said Ms. Herbert can be Brooke's contact and clarified that Ms. Herbert will field Brooke's request and will pass on information to the Commission and will act under direction of the Commission. Chair Welch stated that for better or worse the Commission is a group of nine volunteers and that one volunteer cannot be asked to undertake the burden of fielding all official requests from the MPCA regarding the TMDL. Ms. Black said she is curious as to the role of the Commission's engineering firm regarding the TMDL process given that the Commission approved having the MPCA hire the contractors to do the Medicine Lake TMDL work. Chair Welch answered that the role of the Commission Engineer is to advise the Commission on this TMDL study so the Commission can make appropriate decisions. Ms. Black responded by saying that would mean that Barr Engineering should not be communicating information other than information that has come through the Commission. Ms. Black said she thinks there has been some confusion on whether some information going to the MPCA from the Commission Engineer is coming from the Commission or from the engineering firm itself. Ms. Black asked if the Commission wants the Commission Engineer to technically review all the information and offer its comments or not. Ms. Black said the Commission has not defined those lines of responsibility and communication. Chair Welch said he agrees that they have not yet been defined and said the Commission hasn't had a chance to do so since the contracts had only been finalized in the last month. Chair Welch said the commissioners are not technical experts and rely on its technical experts for feedback. Ms. Black clarified that if the Commission Engineer has comments then the the Engineer should provide those comments to the Commission for direction. Ms. Peterson raised the point that timely issues do come up between Commission meetings and the Commission may need the Commission Engineer to conduct communications even if the Commission doesn't meet to discuss them. Ms. Asleson remarked that this TMDL study will have a technical stakeholder advisory committee. She said all the study results will be given to the Committee as the project goes on and everyone will have an opportunity to provide feedback and raise concerns. Chair Welch said he thinks the Commission needs to hear from the TAC on the issues Barr raised about the work plan [in Barr's August 20th memo] and that the Commission needs to give the MPCA and the consultant time to look over the issues raised Ms. Asleson said she can look over the comments and stated that by sharing the work plan with the Commission she was not requesting the Commission's approval of the work plan. She said she had gotten approval by the Commission to take a leadership role and to be the project manager. She explained that she took the work plan developed by the MPCA, the TMDL stakeholders, and the Commission's TAC and she modified if as necessary to create three different work plans to be submitted in the RFP (request for proposals) process. She said there are contracts in place and at this point the work plans cannot be changed. She said she would need to go through a process to make changes but that the contracts are in place, and this is the work plan the project is moving forward with. Ms. Asleson stated that if the Commission feels like there is a significant problem or deficit with the work plan then that would be a big concern to the MPCA and the stakeholders would need to take a step back and consider if they want to move forward with the project. She added that at this point the project is moving forward and people have already started the work. Ms. Black said she doesn't understand at least two and maybe three of the issues that Barr has raised in its memo [August 20th memo]. She said she needed more information from Barr on why it even raised the points as issues. Ms. Black commented that the language she reads in the TMDL work plan covers issues one, two, and three as discussed in Barr's memo. She said that in regard to #248959 vI BCWMC August 21, 2008, Meeting Minutes Page 7 the waste load allocation [memo issue three] the Commission could specify that individual waste load allocations must be determined, but she said she thinks that the stakeholder group is supposed to come back to the Commission with a recommendation. Ms. Black said that the memo also says that the TMDL process will identify BMPs (best management practices) not previously evaluated and she said she doesn't understand what those BMPs would be and she would like to know from Barr what it thinks those BMPs would be because she doesn't see anything new out there except maybe some vaults. Chair Welch said when he looks at some of the issues raised by Barr he thinks that they are issues that may be addressed by the implementation plan, but he said that there is some level of misunderstanding so it seems to him that the issues may be fairly quickly rectified although now he hears Brooke saying maybe not and that maybe the partners don't want to move forward on the TMDL. Chair Welch said that it sounds to him like Ms. Asleson has raised the question of stopping the TMDL when he perceived the matter as an information request. Ms. Asleson said she was just clarifying that if the Commission has a serious concern with the work plan then she needs to be informed of it. She said that as the project moves forward, the project is using that work plan [August 12, 2008, work plan], which is the work plan the Commission provided. Ms. Asleson stated that any changes she made were just to clean up the plan to make it clear for the bidding process in order to receive responses consistent among everyone. She said that was her goal when she made the insignificant changes. Ms. Asleson said the project will move forward unless the Commission feels there is a significant error or problem with the work plan she has provided to the Commission. Chair Welch said he hasn't heard anyone say that there is a significant problem. He said he also hears a threat in Ms. Asleson's comments. Ms. Sundberg remarked that she agreed with Chair Welch. Ms. Asleson apologized if her comments came off as a threat and stated that she is trying to keep the group moving forward and productive and she doesn't want to slow down the process. Ms. Asleson said she can take the Commission's comments back to the MPCA's technical team and provide the Commission feedback on the comments. She requested that if at any point the Commission feels there is a serious issue she wants the Commission to please inform her. Ms. Asleson remarked that the MPCA and the Commission are partners in the project and that they need to make sure they are on the same page and moving forward together. Chair Welch said he can't respond at this point whether or not there is a serious issue because he is operating with deference to professionals who have noted changes that Ms. Asleson has made and who have questions about those changes. He said the Commission meeting is the appropriate venue for a discussion of the issues and he doesn't see anyone who doesn't want the TMDL study to happen. Chair Welch said if there is a significant issue, he would want the Commission to hear about all the different ways the issue could be resolved. He said he hears the stakeholders saying let's do a good TMDL study and he said that if the MS4s aren't on board at any point in the project then the project is toast. Ms. Peterson remarked that the memo from Barr Engineering to the Commission asks for clarification on certain issues. Ms. Black said stated that she thinks that a lot of the issues raised to the Commission in Barr's memo are items the Commission has already discussed, has already made decisions on, and are in the work plan to the extent they are supposed to be. Ms. Black said she is frankly disgusted that Barr Engineering came up with this memo at the last minute after things had been, in her opinion, pretty well settled. She said if the Commission wants to send the issues to the T AC Committee to look at the issues it is fine with her. Ms. Black she said she doesn't know if the MS4s involved have raised the issues discussed in Barr's memo or if the MS4s are upset about the issues raised. She said perhaps the MS4s are the ones the Commission needs to hear from and not Barr Engineering #248959 vI BCWMC August 21, 2008, Meeting Minutes Page 8 because Barr will not have to accept the end result of the TMDL study but the MS4s and the Commission will. Ms. Chandler said Barr Engineering had heard from the MS4s when the work plan for the TMDL study was being put together. She said that input was put forward in the April work plan. Chair Welch asked in what format the MS4 input was received. Ms. Chandler said it may have been from MS4s during TAC meetings. Ms. Asleson said she recalls some letters. Ms. Chandler said there were strong opinions voiced at a Commission meeting that MS4s wanted individual waste load allocations by MS4. Ms. Chandler said there are differences in the work plan that was approved in April by the Commission and the work plan recently forwarded to the Commission by the MPCA. She said that the changes make certain details unclear and although everything in the plan may still be the way the Commission wants it to be, it just isn't clear so Barr recommended the Commission ask for clarification. Ms. Asleson said she thinks a lot of the issues will be determined in the stakeholder process because a lot of the issues are ones the stakeholders need to engage in and provide feedback on in order to move forward. She said the stakeholder process will start early on and that she thinks the kickoff stakeholder meeting will be in September. Chair Welch said he read the work plan as creating possibilities for things to take place such as individual waste load allocations. Chair Welch said he would like to proceed in good faith and assume that people are bringing up legitimate concerns. Chair Welch reiterated the idea that the group needs to use respectful dialog in this process and needs to assume that people are acting in good faith as opposed to any other motivation. Ms. Loomis stated that the memo points out things that the Commission should look for as the project goes forward. Ms. Loomis suggested that the Commission forward Barr's memo to the MPCA and ask for clarification. Chair Welch said the Commission could also ask for TAC's input on the issues raised by Barr's memo and that the TAC should put the discussion on its September 4th agenda. Chair Welch asked if the Commission wants the issues to go to the TAC [several commissioners agreed and one commissioner did not agree with the idea]. Chair Welch directed the TAC to look at the issues raised by Barr about the final Medicine Lake TMDL study work plan and to discuss them at the TAC's September 4th meeting. Ms. Asleson said that kickoff meeting for the stakeholder advisory meeting is slated to occur in September and asked for the Commission's assistance in putting together a list of potential participants. She said she would like there to be a good mix of technical and non technical people on the stakeholder group. Ms. Asleson commented that the MS4s will be participating in the stakeholder involvement committee as MS4s so the BCWMC will want to select for the committee a representative of the Commission that is not an MS4 member. Ms. Black asked if the Commission's representative needs to be a technical person. Ms. Asleson responded that the technical and stakeholder groups will be combined and will receive two half-day trainings about TMDLs, hydrology, and modeling and so the representative does not need to be a technical expert to participate. She said she would like the committee to have a good mix of technical and non technical participants. Ms. Asleson encouraged as many of the BCWMC members as possible to attend the kickoff stakeholder meeting. Ms. Loomis stated that if the Commission asks a Commission technical representative from one of the non-MS4 cities to attend the stakeholder meetings on the Commission's behalf then the Commission should offer to pay for that person's time. She said if the Commission were to send the Commission Engineer then the Commission would pay the Engineer, if the Commission asks a city to send one of their technical staff to attend the meetings, from a city perspective she would expect some kind of...[Ms. Loomis was interrupted.] Chair Welch interjected that it is appropriate that if the Commission sends someone to the meetings as the Commission representative then the Commission can't expect the city to pay for it because that person is not there to represent the city. He said that is a good point for the #248959 vI BCWMC August 21, 2008, Meeting Minutes Page 9 Commission to consider. The Commission directed Ms. Herbert to forward the stakeholder meeting request, once developed, to all BCWMC and TAC members. Chair Welch asked for clarification on why the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) is considered a project partner in this work plan and he noted that the Three Rivers Park District is in a dual role. Ms. Asleson said she is trying to get the DNR to work closely with the MPCA on the TMDL studies. She said the DNR has a vested interest in the lake and she thought it is important it work with the MPCA on this TMDL project. Ms. Asleson said the Three Rivers Park District is vested as a big landowner. Chair Welch commented that the work plan states that the implementation plan will be submitted to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and asked if the EPA will be asked to approve the implementation plan. Ms. Asleson said the EPA doesn't approve the implementation plan but will receive it. E. Pilgrim Lane Elementary Education Grant Reimbursement Request. Ms. Black stated that she had e-mailed to the Commission the final report from Pilgrim Lane Elementary regarding its use of the BCWMC's education grant funds. Ms. Black moved to approve the final disbursement of the grant funds to Pilgrim Lane Elementary. Ms. Sundberg seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously. F. Resource Management Plan. Chair Welch said if the Commission decides to go forward with the resource management plan (RMP) the Commission needs to consider whether it wants to do EA Ws at the same time as the RMP. Chair Welch said the Army Corps of Engineers provided the BCWMC with some information in response to questions the Commission had sent to the Corps. He said he noted that the biggest change suggested in the Corps' response was the inclusion of a public participation process. Chair Welch said the Commission could invite a representative of the Corps to attend the September meeting. The Commission indicated it did not have interest in having a representative from the Corps at the next meeting. He asked for input from Mr. LeFevere on whether the Commission would want to do a voluntary environmental assessment at the same time as an RMP. Ms. Sanger suggested the Commission Counsel prepare a summary of pros and cons of conducting voluntary EA Ws at the time of the RMP. Chair Welch directed staff to prepare such a memo. Ms. Loomis moved to table the Resource Management Plan discussion until the September meeting. Ms. Black seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously. Communications A. Chair: i. Chair Welch announced that in October the BCWMC will discuss posting its request for letters of interest proposals for the consultant positions. ii. Chair Welch requested that ideas for water quality projects for the Mississippi Watershed Management Organization's Stewardship Fund Grants be passed on to the Commission Engineer [Letters of Interest due September 22]. iii. Chair Welch reported on the BCWMC commissioner training session held August 12th. B. Commissioners: i. Ms. Loomis reported that she had attended the first meeting of the Upper Mississippi TMDL Study meeting and that the next meeting hasn't yet been scheduled. She announced that this is #248959 vI BCWMC August 21, 2008, Meeting Minutes Page 10 an election year for Soil and Water Conservation District representatives and suggested the BCWMC hold a candidate forum at the October BCWMC meeting. Chair Welch directed Ms. Loomis to work with Ms. Herbert on details about potentially hosting a forum. ii. Mr. Stauner announced that the City of New Hope has concerns about mosquito issues related to water quality ponds in the city and is requesting that the BCWMC coordinate with the Mosquito Control District regarding pond projects in which the BCMWC participates. C. Committees: i. Administrator Services Committee: Chair Welch reported that the Committee received the draft report from Springsted, Inc. regarding the organizational analysis of the BCWMC and the final report will be presented to the Commission at its September meeting. ii. Education and Public Outreach Committee: Ms. Langsdorf announced that she has brought the BCWMC display and it is available for anyone from the Commission to take it with them to display in their city. She said that Mr. Stockhaus has a sign up sheet for the Commission members to sign up for a date to bring the display to their city. Ms. Langsdorf thanked the City of Minneapolis for providing the great 22" by 44" map that shows the city's watersheds and asked the other cities to please provide a similar map to the Education and Public Outreach Committee. She announced that the next Joint Education and Public Outreach Committee meeting will be on September 16th at 8:30 a.m. at Plymouth City Hall. D. Counsel* E. Engineer: Ms. Chandler announced that regarding the Sweeney Lake TMDL Study the BCWMC is still waiting to hear about who will be replacing limnologist Beruie Lentz. She said today's meeting packet contains the phase 1 summary report and the semi-annual report on the project. Ms. Chandler said phase 1 of the project is complete and phase 2 is in the monitoring phase. 8. Adjournment Ms. Black moved to adjourn the meeting. Ms. Loomis seconded the motion. The meeting adjourned at 2:20 p.m. Michael Welch, Chair Date Amy Herbert, Recorder Date Pauline Langsdorf, Secretary Date #248959 vI BCWMC August 21, 2008, Meeting Minutes Page 11 alley Memorand m Planning 763-593-8095/763-593-8109 (fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting October 21, 2008 Agenda Item 3. E. Requesting Additional Time to Complete Comprehensive Plan Decennial Review Obligations Prepared By Joe Hogeboom, City Planner Summary The Metropolitan Council originally required metro-area municipalities to submit decennial updates to their comprehensive plans no later than December 31,2008. However, due to an overwhelming need of communities for additional time to complete their comprehensive plans, the Metropolitan Council is extending its submittal deadline to May 29, 2009. To adhere to the newly extended deadline, the City must adopt a resolution requesting additional time within which to complete the comprehensive plan. The City is exceeding Metropolitan Council minimum requirements for updating the comprehensive plan by completely recreating the entire document, making it more accessible to residents, property owners, City representatives, and other governmental agencies. This work will require additional time beyond the December 31,2008 deadline. Staff believes the plan will be completed and ready to begin the public hearing process by February, 2009. Council Members received copies of Chapters 1 -5 at the October 7 City Council Meeting, and will discuss the plan, in its entirety, at an upcoming Special Council/Manager Meeting scheduled for October 30. This will officially begin the required public review period for the comprehensive plan. Attachments Resolution Requesting Additional Time Within Which to Complete Comprehensive Plan Decennial Review Obligations (1 page) Recommended Action Motion to adopt Resolution Requesting Additional Time Within Which to Complete Comprehensive Plan Decennial Review Obligations. Resolution 08-46 October 21, 2008 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION REQUESTING ADDITIONAL TIME WITHIN WHICH TO COMPLETE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN "DECENNIAL" REVIEW OBLIGATIONS WHEREAS, the City prepared and submitted to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) its permit application for operation of the City's Municipal Separate Storm Sewer (MS4) on March 10, 2003; and, WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes section 473.864 requires local governmental units to review and, if necessary, amend their entire comprehensive plans and their fiscal devices and official controls at least once every ten years to ensure comprehensive plans conform with metropolitan system plans and ensure fiscal devices and official controls do not conflict with comprehensive plans or permit activities that conflict with metropolitan system plans; and, WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes sections 473.858 and 473.864 require local governmental units to complete their decennial reviews by December 31,2008; and, WHEREAS, any extensions granted by the Metropolitan Council must include a timetable and plan for completing the review and amendment; and, WHEREAS, the City will not be able to complete its decennial review by December 31,2008; and, WHEREAS, the City Council finds it is appropriate to request from the Metropolitan Council an extension so the City can have additional time to complete and submit to the Metropolitan Council for review an updated comprehensive plan and amend its fiscal devices and official controls. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED; 1. The Director of Planning and Development is directed to submit to the Metropolitan Council no later than November 1, 2008, an application requesting an extension to May 29,2009. 2. The Director of Planning and Development must include with the request a reasonably detailed timetable and plan for completing:. (a) the review and amendment by May 29, 2009; and (b) the review and amendment of the City's fiscal devices and official controls. Linda R. Loomis, Mayor ATTEST: Susan M. Virnig, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and her signature attested by the City Clerk. Hey M randu Finance 163-593-8013/163-593-8109 (fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting October 21, 2008 Agenda Item 3. F. Waiver of Public Hearing and Certification of Special Assessments - 2008(2) Driveways Prepared By Sue Virnig, Finance Director Summary Agreements have been signed with the property owners regarding total costs and waiving the public hearing pursuant to Minnesota Statues 429.031. By adopting the resolution it allows the property owner to pay for their driveway improvement over time with their property taxes. Attachments List of Driveway Projects Assessed in 2008(2) (1 page) Resolution Waiving the Public Hearing Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 429.031 and Ordering Certification of Special Assessments on Driveways that Involve 2008(2) Pavement Management Area (1 page) Recommended Action Motion to adopt Resolution Waiving the Public Hearing Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 429.031 and Ordering Certification of Special Assessments on Driveways that Involve 2008(2) Pavement Management Area. 2008 PMP DRIVEWAYS Address 2900 Cherokee Place 2901 Cherokee Place 2941 Cherokee Place 4747 Culver Road 5038 Culver Road 5047 Culver Road 4900 Normandy Place 2900 Quail Ave. N. 2940 Quail Ave. N. 2943 Quail Ave. N. Total Assessment 4,662.75 2,550.29 1,788.94 6,749.15 6,195.58 8,763.81 3,668.58 3,496.34 2,712.14 7,713.60 2008 PMP - Private Drivewavs 48,301.19 Resolution 08-47 October 21, 2008 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION WAIVING THE PUBLIC HEARING PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA STATUTES 429.031 AND ORDERING CERTIFICATION OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS ON DRIVEWAYSTHAT INVOLVE 2008(2) PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT AREA Project Years Interest Rate First Year Levy Total Assessed 2008(2) City 10 7% 2009 $48,301.19 Driveways 1. Each individual address (lots) will be assessed the full value of the signed contract with the homeowner for the various driveway improvement(s). 2. The proposed assessments are hereby adopted and confirmed as the proper assessments for each of said property respectively together with interest at the rate of seven (7) percent per annum accruing on the full amount thereof unpaid, shall be a lien concurrent with general taxes upon parcel and all thereof. The total amount of each such assessment not prepaid shall be payable in equal annual principal installments extending over a period of 10 years, as indicated in each case. 3. The first of said installments, together with interest on the entire assessment for the period of January 1 through December 31, 2009, will be payable with general taxes for the year of 2008, collectible in 2009, and one of each of the remaining installments, together with one year's interest on that and all other unpaid installments, will be paid with general taxes for each consecutive year thereafter unless the entire assessment is paid in full by November 19, 2008. 4. The owner may payoff the assessment in full after November 19, 2008 with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. 5. The City Clerk shall, as soon as may be, prepare and transmit to the County Auditor a certified duplicate of the assessment roll, with each installment and interest on each unpaid assessment set forth separately, to be extended upon the proper tax lists of the County and the County Auditor shall thereafter collect said assessment in the manner provided by law. Linda R. Loomis, Mayor ATTEST: Susan M. Virnig, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and her signature attested by the City Clerk. J, 1 Hey mo n um Finance 763-593-8013/763-593-8109 (fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting October 21, 2008 Agenda Item 3. G. Adoption of Identity Theft Prevention Program Prepared By Susan Virnig, Finance Director Summary Federal regulations require the City of Golden Valley establish an Identity Theft Prevention Program designed to detect, prevent and mitigate identity theft. Entities that maintain transaction accounts for customers, including utilities, must comply with the regulations. Staff does not expect operational changes due to the implementation of the program. Attachments FACT Act Identity Theft Prevention Program (5 pages) Recommended Action Motion to approve the City's Identity Theft Prevention Program. FACT Act Identity Theft Prevention Program Summary Federal regulations require the City of Golden Valley ("City") to establish an Identity Theft Prevention Program ("Program"), designed to detect, prevent, and mitigate identity theft. The Program must include the identification of Red Flags that are relevant to the City's customer accounts, the detection of Red Flags, and the mitigation of and/or response to detected Red Flags. The following Program is to be administered by the FACT Act Officer, which is designated as the Finance Director of the City. The FACT Act Officer shall see that the appropriate personnel receive training to properly implement the Program. The FACT Act Officer shall report at least annually to the City Council on the status of the Program. Finally, the FACT Act Officer shall periodically reassess the City's risks of identity theft and the ability of Program to address that identity theft and, if necessary, modify the Program. I. Definitions A "Red Flag" means a pattern, practice, or specific activity that indicates the possible existence of identity theft. A "covered account" means a continuing relationship established by a person for personal, family, household or business purposes that involves or is designed to permit multiple payments or transactions. "Identity Theft" means a fraud committed or attempted using the identifying information of another person without authority. "Service provider" means a third party that provides a service directly to, or behalf of the City. II. Identifying Relevant Red Flags The City will consider the following risk factors in identifying relevant Red Flags for its covered accounts, as appropriate: 1. The types of covered accounts it offers or maintains; 2. The methods it provides to open its covered accounts; 3. The methods it provides to access its covered accounts; and 4. Its previous experiences with identity theft. The City will incorporate Red Flags from sources such as: 1. Incidents of identity theft that the City has experienced; 2. Methods of identity theft that the City has identified that reflect changes in identity theft risks; and, 3. Applicable supervisory guidance. The Categories of Red Flags will include but are not limited to: 1. The presentation of suspicious documents; 2. The presentation of suspicious personal identifying information, such as a suspicious address change; 3. The unusual use of, or other suspicious activity related to, a covered account; and, 4. Notice from customers, victims of identity theft, law enforcement authorities, or other persons regarding possible identity theft in connection with covered accounts. Red Flags that the City will consider are included in Section VII of this Identity Theft Prevention Program. This list will be updated with new Red Flags as they are detected by the City over time. III. Detecting Red Flags The City will incorporate procedures for the detection of Red Flags in connection with the opening of new accounts by: 1. Obtaining identifying information of a person prior to opening an account. 2. Such identifying information may include, among others, the use of the customer's name and address The City will continue to detect Red Flags for existing accounts by monitoring transactions for suspicious activity. IV. Responding to Red Flags The City will document an appropriate response to each Red Flag the City has detected, commensurate with the degree of risk posed. In determining an appropriate response, the City will consider factors that may heighten the risk of identity theft. Those factors include unauthorized access to a customer's account records or notification that a customer has provided information to someone fraudulently or to a fraudulent website. Appropriate responses may include the following: 1. Monitoring a covered account for evidence of identity theft; 2. Contacting the customer; 3. Changing any passwords, security codes, or other security devices that permit access to a covered account; 4. Reopening a covered account with a new account number; 5. Not opening a new covered account; 6. Closing an existing covered account; 7. Not attempting to collect on a covered account or not selling a covered account to a debt collector; 8. Notifying the Attorney General of the State of Minnesota; or, 9. Determining that no response is warranted under the particular circumstances. v. Methods for Administering the Program The City Council is ultimately responsible for the Identity Theft Prevention Program. The FACT Act Officer is responsible for the day-to-day administration and oversight of the Program. The FACT Act Officer is expected to: 1. Assign specific responsibility for the Program's implementation; 2. Review, prepare and provide at least annually, reports on the City's compliance with the Identity Theft Prevention compliance program, the effectiveness of the policy and procedures, significant incidents involving identity theft and the City's response; and recommendations for material changes to the Program; 3. Obtain from the City Council approval of changes to the procedures and approval of policy as necessary to address changing identity theft risks; 4. Train appropriate staff in the detection of Red Flags and the responsive steps to be taken when a Red Flag is detected; and, 5. Whenever the City engages a service provider to perform an activity in connection with one or more accounts, the FACT Act Officer will ensure that the activity of the service provider is conducted in accordance with reasonable policies and procedures designed to detect, prevent, and mitigate the risk of identity theft. For example, the City could require the service provider by contract to have policies and procedures to detect relevant Red Flags that may arise in the performance of the service provider's activities, and either report the Red Flags to the City, or to take appropriate steps to prevent or mitigate identity theft. VI. Updating the Program The City will update the Program (including the Red Flags determined to be relevant) periodically to reflect changes in risks to customers or to the safety and soundness of the City from identity theft, based on factors such as: 1. The experiences of the City with identity theft; 2. Changes in methods of identity theft; 3. Changes in methods to detect, prevent, and mitigate identity theft; 4. Changes in the types of accounts that the City offers or maintains; and, 5. Changes in the business arrangements of the City, including joint ventures, and service provider or service provider arrangements. VII. Identity Theft Prevention Program Red Flags The City's Identity Theft Prevention Program will include but not be limited to the following Red Flags, which shall be updated as necessary and determined by the FACT Act Officer: Suspicious Documents 1. Documents provided for identification appear to have been altered or forged. 2. Information in the document is not consistent with information previously provided by the person when opening a new account. 3. An application appears to have been altered or forged, or gives the appearance of having been destroyed and reassembled. Suspicious Personal Identifying Information 1. Personal identifying information provided by the customer is not consistent with other personal identifying information provided by the customer. 2. Personal identifying information provided is associated with known fraudulent activity as indicated by internal or third-party sources used by the City. For example: a. The address on an application is the same as the address provided on a fraudulent application; or b. The phone number on an application is the same as the number provided on a fraudulent application. Unusual Use of, or Suspicious Activitv Related to, the Covered Account 1. The City is notified by a customer, a victim of identity theft, a law enforcement authority, or any other person that it has opened a fraudulent account for a person engaged in identity theft 2. Mail sent to the customer is returned repeatedly as undeliverable although transactions continue to be conducted in connection with the customer's covered account. 3. The City is notified that the customer is not receiving account statements. 4. The City is notified of unauthorized charges or transactions in connection with a customer's covered account VIII. Specific Program Elements and Confidentiality For the effectiveness of Identity Theft prevention Programs, the federal regulations envision a degree of confidentiality regarding the City's specific practices relating to Identity Theft detection, prevention and mitigation. Therefore, under this Program, knowledge of such specific practices are to be limited to appropriate City employees who need to know them for purposes of preventing Identity Theft. Because this Program is to be adopted by a public body and thus publicly available, it would be counterproductive to list these specific practices here. Therefore, only the Program's general red flag detection, implementation and prevention practices are listed in this document. alley emorandum Public Works 763-593-8030 I 763-593-3988 (fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting October 21, 2008 Agenda Item 3. H. Authorize Participation in the Hennepin County Environmental Response Fund Application Process for the Twin Lake Regional Storm Water Pond Prepared By Jeannine Clancy, Director of Public Works AI Lundstrom, Environmental Coordinator Summary Hennepin County grant money has been made available for environmental investigations related to water quality projects. The Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission has identified in its capital improvement program a water quality improvement pond that would treat storm water prior to entering Twin Lake. The proposed project is identified near the south end of Twin Lake on private property located at 650 Ottawa Avenue North. The property owner has expressed concerns about the potential for contaminants to be identified if a project were to move forward on their property. It is anticipated that completing an environmental assessment may help revive the project and help assure its success. Twin Lake is one of the highest water quality water bodies in the metro area. Treatment of this subwatershed would help protect this valuable asset within the community. Attachments Resolution to Participate in the Hennepin County Environmental Response Fund Grant Application Process for the Development of the Twin Lake Regional Storm Water Pond (1 page) Location Map ( 1 page) Recommended Action Motion to adopt Resolution to Participate in the Hennepin County Environmental Response Fund Grant Application Process for the Development of the Twin Lake Regional Storm Water Pond. Resolution 08-48 October 21, 2008 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION TO PARTICIPATE IN THE HENNEPIN COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE FUND GRANT APPLICATION PROCESS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE TWIN LAKE REGIONAL STORM WATER POND WHEREAS, the City of Golden Valley will submit an application to Hennepin County Department of Environmental Services for participation in financial grant application program which offers grant monies to cities for Environmental Studies, and; WHEREAS, the City Council authorizes the Director of Public Works or her designee to sign the application on behalf of the City of Golden Valley. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Golden Valley that the City supports the Twin Lake Regional Storm Water Pond project, for which an environmental financial grant application is being submitted to the Hennepin County Department of Environmental Services on October 31,2008, by the City of Golden Valley. Linda R. Loomis, Mayor ATTEST: Susan M. Virnig, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and her signature attested by the City Clerk. L~cation Map Twin Lake Pond Print Date: 10/15/0 Sources: 8 Hennepin County S Property Lines (200~).eyors Office for o 190 380 760 Feel alley M mo nd m City Administration/Council 763-593-8006/763-593-8109 (fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting October 21, 2008 Agenda Item 3. I. Reset November 6 City Council Meeting Date Prepared By Judy Nally, Administrative Assistant Summary The first meeting in November was previously rescheduled to Thursday, November 6 because of the General Election. At the Council/Manager meeting the Council discussed changing the date. Recommended Action Motion to reset the November 6 City Council meeting to Monday, November 3,2008. ~ alley Me orandum City Administration/Council 763-593-8006/763-593-8109 (fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting October 21, 2008 Agenda Item 3. J. Set Date for Special Council/Manager Meeting to Review Comprehensive Plan Draft Prepared By Judy Nally, Administrative Assistant Summary Staff recommends a special meeting be set for the Council to review draft chapters of the Comprehensive Plan before it is formally presented at a Regular Council Meeting. Staff and consultants would be available to address Council questions. At the Council/Manager meeting the Council discussed setting a meeting date. Recommended Action Motion to set a Special Council/Manager meeting for Thursday, October 30,2008 at 5:30 pm to review draft chapters of the Comprehensive Plan. Hey Memoran m Planning 763-593-8095 I 763-593-8109 (fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting October 21, 2008 "60 Days" Deadline: December 19, 2008 Agenda Item 4. A. Public Hearing - Preliminary Plat Approval - 1825 Quail Avenue North - Quail Woods - Peter Knaeble (Golden Valley Land Co.), Applicant Prepared By Mark Grimes, Director of Planning and Development Summary At the September 22,2008 Planning Commission meeting, the Commission held an informal public hearing to consider the preliminary plan for the minor subdivision of the property at 1825 Quail Avenue North. The subdivision is called Quail Woods and is being proposed by Peter Knaeble of the Golden Valley Land Co. This minor subdivision would create three lots where there is now one lot and an existing house. As indicated in the attached Planning Commission minutes, several persons spoke at the hearing. After the hearing was closed, the Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the preliminary plan for the minor subdivision of Quail Woods with several conditions. The Planning Commission added a fourth recommendation that states that there shall be no future variances on any of the lots in the Quail Woods subdivision. If the City Council agrees to this condition, it would be made a part of the Subdivision Agreement to be approved at the time the final plat is approved. A copy of the memo sent to the Planning Commission by City Planner Joe Hogeboom and dated September 15, 2008 is attached along with two memos from City Engineer Jeff Oliver, PE that outlines the public improvements that are necessary for this development to go forward. Attachments Location Map (1 page) Planning Commission Minutes dated September 22,2008 (5 pages) Memo to Planning Commission dated September 15, 2008 (3 pages) Memo from City Engineer Jeff Oliver dated September 12, 2008 (3 pages) Memo from City Engineer Jeff Oliver dated October 13, 2008 (2 pages) Letter from Hennepin County Director of Transportation and County Engineer James Grube dated September 11, 2008 (1 page) Site Plans (5 pages, loose in agenda packet) Recommended Action Motion to approve the preliminary plan for the minor subdivision of Quail Woods, located at the corner of Quail Avenue North and Golden Valley Road, subject to the following conditions: 1. The City Attorney will determine if a title review is necessary prior to approval of the final plat. 2. A park dedication fee in the amount of $1,100 shall be paid prior to final plat approval. 3. A Subdivision Agreement will be drafted for review and approval by the City Council that will include issues found in the City Engineer's memos dated September 12, 2008 and October 13, 2008. 4. No future variances will be allowed on any of these lots. This condition would be included in the Subdivision Agreement for Quail Woods. 2010 1951 \~ J SOREllAVl: N o 1943 4975 4955 4945 4935 49Z5 41175 4lI3S o 1920 1l14O SPRlNiG VAWY erR 1900 18%3 1811 ~ I ~ .... ... '" -< ;Q tl 1815 1819 1813 1816 ll101 1811 1800 4900 1801 SPR1NG VAtUY ClR .. 1190 1llOO 1804 1701 4941 4921 4901 4960 4930 49ZO 41112 1640 1644 lfU4 SAINT CROfl( AVE! N 1649 @ 50:>;5 SIllS SOO5 4941 4921 4913 4907 4901 1624 M:lt;lt:r~J''''''{''1 N':;iM$ C.o::Yf"~'I~ :~~-! lOOiSQS~~ .;) Regular Meeting of the Golden Valley Planning Commission September 22, 2008 1. egular meeting of the Planning Commi ion was held at the Golden Valley Ci Co '1 Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley R d, Golden Valley, Minnesota, on Septe 22,2008. Chair Keysser calle he meeting to order at 7 pm. Those present , lanning Commissio rs Cera, Keysser, Klu Schmidgall. Also pre was Director of nning and Devel Administrative Assistant Wittman. Co missioners E , McCarty, and nt Mark Grimes, and Waldhauser were absent. Mayor Loomis was in attendanc October 4. She explained that the id Highway 55 came from Envision Golden funds for the plant materials and landsc map of the area and stated that they General Mills Blvd. to Winnetka in the volunteer efforts. mission Meeting ':1 McCarty r, red to the third paragraph on p ge 15 and stated that he woul that his' ention was that he would like to s the proposed building be set bac just t r) from the property line along Gold Valley Road. M ED by Cera, seconded by McCarty an otion carried unanimously to approve the gust 11, 2008 minutes with the above cia ication. 2. Informal Public Hearing - Minor Subdivision - Quail Woods -1825 Quail Avenue - SU06-03 Applicant: Peter Knaeble (Golden Valley Land Co.) Address: 1825 Quail Avenue Purpose: The subdivision would create three separate lots and allow for the construction of two new homes. The existing home will remain. Grimes referred to a location map and noted that the location of his proposed subdivision is at the southwest corner of Golden Valley Road and Quail Avenue near Scheid Park. He explained that the applicant is proposing to subdivide the 38,714 square foot lot into three new lots. He added that the existing home will remain, but the existing garage will be relocated. He stated that all three lots exceed the minimum lot size requirements and noted that utilities are available to each lot. He explained that when building permits are applied for, a tree preservation plan and grading and erosion control plan will be required for each lot. He stated that staff is recommending approval of this proposed subdivision because it meets all of the requirements of the zoning code and subdivision code. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission September 22, 2008 Page 2 Kluchka asked if there are any covenants on this property. Grimes said he is not aware of any covenants on this property. Kluchka asked about the owner of the property. Grimes stated that the applicant has purchased this property from a trust. Peter Knaeble, Applicant, stated that his intent is to remodel the existing house which has been vacant for about a year. He clarified that the sale of the property closes at the ehd of October at which time he will rearrange the location of the existing driveway and garage and start renovating the existing home. He reiterated that all three lots exceed the minimum standards and that all three homes will meet all of the setback requirements. He stated that the property is heavily wooded and that the vast majority of the trees will remain however one or two may be removed on each lot in order to construct the new homes. Keysser asked the applicant if he plans to sell the parcels after the property is subdivided or if he is planning on building the homes on the lots and then selling them. Knaeble stated that he is subdividing the property then selling the lots to builders or buyers who would then build custom homes. Keysser asked the applicant if he anticipates doing any grading of the property. Knaeble said no and explained that the grading on the individual lots will be done by the builders when the homes are built. McCarty referred to Lot 3, the northern most lot, and asked about the square footage of the proposed home. Knaeble said the footprint would be approximately 1,500 square feet and the home would be approximately 2,500 to 3,000 square feet in size. Grimes added that staff and the applicant have made sure that the existing home and both new homes will meet all of the new setback requirements without any variances being issued. Kluchka suggested adding a condition of approval that states no variances will be granted in the future for any of these homes. Schmidgall asked the applicant if he is planning on "rouging-in" the utilities to the proposed new lots. Knaeble said they will be "roughing-in" the utilities but not until the first house is ready to be built. Grimes asked the applicant to discuss the trees on the property. Knaeble said they did a complete tree survey. He explained that on Lot 1 there may be one tree removed depending on the placement of the house. On Lot 2 there may be a couple of trees removed behind the existing house and on Lot 3 one or two trees may be removed in order to build a new house. He stated that they will be doing individual tree preservation plans for each lot. Keysser asked if there will be a rain garden installed on Lot 2 where the existing house is located. Knaeble said he is not planning on installing a rain garden at this point but he is waiting to see what the Bassett Creek Management Commission will require. Grimes added that this development is small enough not to require any ponding but it will require that best management practices be followed. Keysser opened the public hearing. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission September 22, 2008 Page 3 Roma Witzig, 1840 Quail Avenue North, asked if the developer could give some background information on his company, projects they've done in the past and builders they have used. She asked what assurances the neighbors have as to the quality of these proposed new homes. She said she is very concerned about these homes becoming rental properties and she wants to be notified when the proposed new homes are to be built. Lynn Gitelis, 4945 Golden Valley Road, said she will end up living next to whatever is built on this property. She said that some of the existing trees may not be worth preserving because they are dying. She said she is concerned about having extra activity and a garage and cars right next door to her. She said she would prefer if two houses were built instead of three. She referred to the traffic in the area and stated that it is very difficult to turn left off of Quail Avenue onto Golden Valley Road throughout most of the day. She said it would be great to see someone living at this property again but reiterated that she would rather see two houses built, not three. She said she would like to see the property cleaned up and she is also concerned about the design of the new houses. Catherine Martignacco, 4846 Golden Valley Road, said she keeps her eye on Golden Valley. She said she is concerned, and knows there are others concerned, about these houses becoming rental properties and she would strongly object to any kind of twin home or rental property being built here. She said she agrees that two houses would be better than three and that traffic is a concern. Sam Madrid, 4900 Frontenac Avenue, said he is concerned about the impact to the side yard setback area next to his property. He said he realizes this project isn't going to be stopped by the neighborhood but he lives next to Lot 1 and even though the applicant is legally meeting the setback requirements he would like to see a larger setback area between his property and the proposed new Lot 1. He said he thinks the side and front yard setbacks should be consistent with the other side and front yard setbacks in the neighborhood. He added that he would also like windows along the south side of the proposed house on Lot 1 minimized for his privacy. Seeing and hearing no one else wishing to comment, Keysser closed the public hearing. Knaeble discussed some of the other projects he has done in Golden Valley and other cities and discussed his background. Kluchka referred to the other projects the applicant has done and asked if he just subdivided the properties to prepare them for sale or if he has built houses on the properties and then sold them. Knaeble said he mostly does infill developments where he subdivides properties and sells them to builders to build what they want. He explained that he doesn't know what type or style these proposed new homes will be, but the plans will be reviewed by the City and the City does not have any design standards so he doesn't know if the neighbors will be able to have input on the building design. He said he recognizes that this property has been abandoned and is run-down but it is his intent to clean it up. He referred to the concerns expressed regarding traffic and said he doesn't see two more lots having an impact to the existing streets. He referred to the concerns about rental properties and stated that the property is zoned R-1 so single-family homes Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission September 22, 2008 Page 4 will be built but if someone wants to rent out their home in the future he has no control over that and he is not sure if the City does either. Kluchka questioned the proposed location of the existing garage. Knaeble said he is not sure yet where on the lot the garage will be placed but it will probably be attached to home and it will meet all setback requirements. Grimes referred to the concern about the quality of the proposed new homes and stated that the City does not require single-family homes to be reviewed by neighboring property owners. McCarty said he would be in favor of this proposal with the condition added that there will be no variance requests made in the future. Keysser questioned if the City can legally not allow someone to ask for a variance. Grimes stated that a stipulation regarding not allowing future variances has been put in subdivision development agreements in the past. He stated that the City Council can always choose to override a subdivision development agreement. He added that he thinks there is plenty of room for good sized houses on these proposed lots without needing any variances. Knaeble said he thinks it would be unfair to the new homeowners to preclude variances because it is not required for any of the other homes in Golden Valley. He added that he would ask the City Council to strike language in the subdivision development agreement regarding not allowing future variances because no one can foresee what the future zoning code requirements will be. Keysser suggested getting the City Attorney's opinion regarding future variances. He noted that just because a homeowner asks for a variance doesn't mean they would get one and he would like to leave that condition out of the Planning Commission's approval and let the Board of Zoning Appeals do their job regarding variance requests. Cera said he agreed with McCarty and Kluchka that there should be a condition of approval that no variances will be allowed on these lots in the future. Grimes agreed and said there really is no reason or justification for variances on any of these proposed lots. He explained that there is a state statute that says subdivision agreements are subject to the zoning regulations currently in place for two years from the time of approval of the subdivision agreement. McCarty stated that putting language in the subdivision development agreement about not allowing future variances doesn't mean that a homeowner can't come before the Board of Zoning Appeals and ask for a variance especially if it is for a hardship created by the City if the zoning code requirements are amended. Keysser suggested the Commissioners take a separate vote on the issue of adding a condition regarding allowing future variances. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission September 22,2008 Page 5 The following Commissioners voted yes to add a condition of approval stating that future variances would not be allowed: Cera, Kluchka and McCarty. Commissioners Keysser and Schmidgall voted no. Kluchka asked Grimes about the best way for the neighbors to mitigate the traffic issues. Grimes stated that there has been additional right-of-way given as a part of this proposal. He stated that this proposal would add approximately 20 trips per day to the existing traffic, not counting the 10 trips per day for the existing home. He noted that the City Engineer does not have concerns about the traffic being generated by this proposal, but he could ask him to address the issue before this proposal goes on to the City Council. Kluchka asked what the neighbors could do to be proactive about the traffic issues. Grimes suggested they talk to the Director of Public Works or the City Engineer about their traffic concerns. MOVED by McCarty, seconded by Kluchka and motion carried unanimously to recommend approval of the request to subdivide the property located at 1825 Quail Avenue into three lots with the following conditions: 1. The City Attorney will determine if a title review is necessary prior to approval of the final plat. 2. A park dedication fee in the amount of $1 ,100 shall be paid prior to final plat approval. 3. A Subdivision Agreement will be drafted for review and approval by the City Council that will include issues found in the City Engineer's memo dated September 12, 2008. 4. No future variances will be allowed on any of these lots. Roma Witzig, 1840 Quail Avenue North, asked the applicant when the existing home would be renovated and if there is a prospective buyer for the house. She asked who would be responsible for the upkeep of the property until they sell the lots. She added that she never realized how few rights property owners have. Knaeble said he would be responsible for the properties when they close on the sale at the end of October. He said the renovations will begin right away and then the existing home and new lots will be sold. Grimes explained that there is a single-family housing maintenance code that these houses will be subject to follow. Knaeble stated that there will be a period of transition but that the existing house has been in transition for a year and a half already. He added that in 2006 when the streets were reconstructed in this area the City assessed the property owner for three lots, not two, so the owners expected there to be three lots in the future. ---Short Recess--- ;; Planning 763-593-8095 I 763-593-8109 (fax) Date: September 15, 2008 To: Golden Valley Planning Commission From: Joe Hogeboom, City Planner Subject Informal Public Hearing on Preliminary Plan for Minor Subdivision of 1825 Quail Avenue North - Peter Knaeble (Golden Valley Land Co.), Applicant Summary of Request Peter Knaeble of Golden Valley Land Co. is proposing to subdivide the property located at 1825 Quail Avenue North (formerly 4915 Golden Valley Road), into three separate lots. Mr. Knaeble has proposed to create two additional residential lots of record to the north and south of the existing home. The existing home would remain in place as proposed Lot 2. The total area of all three proposed lots is .91 acres (39,714 square feet.) If the proposed subdivision were to occur, each new lot would exceed the required 10,000 square foot minimum set forth by the Zoning Code. Proposed Lot 1 (southern-most lot) would consist of approximately 12,618 square feet of land, proposed Lot 2 (middle lot) would consist of approximately 13,237 square feet of land, and proposed Lot 3 (northern-most lot) would consist of approximately 13,859 square feet of land. The existing home that would be located on Lot 2 would meet all setback requirements for the new lot. Setback boundaries on the other two lots would allow standard homes to be built without variance from City Code. Qualification as a Minor Subdivision The proposed three lot subdivision qualifies as a minor subdivision because the property located at 1825 Quail Avenue North is part of a recorded plat. In addition, this proposed subdivision will produce fewer than four lots and will not create need for public improvements (such as street reconstruction.) The applicant has submitted the required information to the City that allows for the subdivision to be evaluated as a minor subdivision. Staff Review of Minor .Subdivision Staff has evaluated this lot subdivision request as a minor subdivision. This request creates three lots that each exceed the minimum lot requirements in the R-1 Single Family Residential Zoning District. (Minimum requirements are that lots must be at least 10,000 square feet in area with 80 feet of width at the front yard setback line which is 35 feet from the street right-of- way.) " The applicant has submitted a survey for the property located at 1825 Quail Avenue North that denote proposed lot layout and setback boundaries following lot division. These documents provide the City with information necessary to evaluate the minor subdivision. All documents show the existing home at 1825 Quail Avenue as part of future lot configuration. City Engineer Jeff Oliver, PE, has submitted a memorandum dated September 12, 2008 regarding recommendations from the Public Works Department concerning this request. Requirements set forth in this memo are itemized in the staff-recommended action area of this report. Qualification Governing Approval as a Minor Subdivision According to Section 12.50 of the City's Subdivision Regulations, the following are the regulations governing approval of minor subdivisions with staff comment related to this req uest: 1. Minor subdivisions shall be denied if the proposed lots do not meet the requirements of the appropriate zoninq district. All proposed lots will meet the requirements set forth by the R1 Single Family Residential Zoning District. 2. A minor subdivision may be denied if the City Enqineer determines that the lots are not buildable. There is already an existing home on proposed lot 2 of the subdivision area. According to the City Engineer, the other two lots are adequate for the construction of a home. City services can be made available to all lots through developer requirements. 3. A minor subdivision may be denied if there are no sewer and water connections available or if it is determined by the City Enqineer that an undue strain will be placed on City utility systems by the addition of the new lots. Sewer and water connections are already provided to the existing home on proposed Lot 2. If subdivided, proposed Lot 3 would retain water service from an existing line on Golden Valley Road. The other two proposed lots would receive water from a line on Quail Avenue. All sanitary sewer service would be provided from a line along Quail Avenue. 4. Approval of the minor subdivision may require the qrantinq of certain easements to the City. The final plat must show all necessary easements as required by the City Engineer and City ordinances. 5. If public aqencies other than the City have iurisdiction of the streets adiacent to the minor subdivision. the aqencies will be qiven the opportunities to comment. Hennepin County has reviewed the preliminary plat and has found it to be acceptable as submitted pertheir letter dated September 11, 2008. 6. The City may ask for review of title if required by the City Attorney for dedication of certain easements. The City Attorney will determine if such a title review is necessary prior to approval of the final plat. 7. The minor subdivision may be subiect to park dedication requirements. In this case, a park dedication fee will be paid by the developer prior to final plat approval. The fee amount will be $1,100 as per City Code requirements. .. Recommended Action The Planning Department recommends approval of the minor subdivision with the conditions listed below: 1. The City Attorney will determine if a title review is necessary prior to approval of the final plat. 2. A park dedication fee in the amount of $1,100 shall be paid prior to final plat approval. 3. A Subdivision Agreement will be drafted for review and approval by the City Council that will include issues found in the City Engineer's memo dated September 12, 2008. Attachments: Location Map ( 1 page) Memo from City Engineer Jeff Oliver dated September 12, 2008 (2 pages) Letter from Hennepin County Director of Transportation & County Engineer James Grube dated September 11, 2008 ( 1 page) Site Plans (3 pages) nlley Memorandum Public Works 763.593.8030 I 763.593.3988 (fax) Date: September 12, 2008 From: Mark Grimes, Director of Planning and Development Jeff Oliver, PE, City En9ineec1ffJ Quail Woods To: Subject: Public Works staff has reviewed the plans for the proposed Quail Woods residential subdivision. This proposed development is located south of Golden Valley Road and west of Quail Avenue. Preliminarv Plat and Site Plan This proposed development includes subdivision of an oversized lot with an existing single-family home into three single-family lots. The proposed plans include retaining the existing home, but demolishing the existing detached garage and constructing a new garage. Golden Valley Road, adjacent to this proposed development to the north, is a Hennepin County road (County Road 66). Therefore, the plans must be reviewed by the County. The developer will be required to dedicate any additional right-of-way or easements identified by the County during its review. The developer had submitted preliminary plans to Hennepin County for comments, and a small right-of-way dedication is shown on the preliminary plat just west of Quail Avenue. This right-of-way dedication is parallel to the centerline of Golden Valley Road and creates a consistent right-of-way across this property. The final plat for this development must include easements on all property lines consistent with the City's Subdivision Ordinance. These required easements are shown in an acceptable manner on the preliminary plat. The driveways to all three of the lots within this development will connect to Quail Avenue, which was reconstructed by the City as part of its 2006 Pavement Management Project (PMP). The PMP project included three $3,500 unit assessments to the property being subdivided. One of these assessments was levied to the property, and two of the unit assessments were deferred until the property was subdivided. G:\Developments - Private\Quail Woods\Review 091208.doc Therefore, the developer will be required to pay the deferred assessments, totaling $7,000 prior to approval of the final plat. The developer will be required to obtain Right-of-Way permits from the City for all work within the right-of-way of Quail Avenue, including driveway construction and utility service installation. This issue will be discussed further in the Utility portion of this review. Utilities City water and sanitary sewer service is available to the property being subdivided, and there is adequate capacity available within these City systems to accommodate the development. The existing home on this property must comply with the City's Inflow and Infiltration Ordinance. The home is not currently in compliance. The existing home on this property currently receives City water service from the watermain in Golden Valley Road, and sanitary sewer service from Quail Avenue. In order to eliminate crossing the private property being created with a private water service, a new water service must be installed from Quail Avenue for the existing home. The existing water service from Golden Valley Road may be utilized for the proposed home on Lot 3. The developer must install all of the required sanitary sewer and water services to the lots in this development prior to issuance of any building permits for the subdivision. The construction of these services must not be assigned to builders for installation at the time of home construction. The developer will also be required to post securities with the City as part of the development agreement for the utility services and the restoration of Quail Avenue. As outlined within the City's Right-of-Way Management Ordinance, the restoration requirements for streets that are excavated are based upon the age of the street. The reconstruction of Quail Avenue in 2006 places the roadway into the highest restoration standards category. Therefore, following excavation of the street for utilities and driveway apron installation, the developer will be required to perform a full width pavement mill and overlay between Golden Valley Road and the south line of the subdivision. This work must be performed immediately following utility service and driveway apron installation. Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control The developer has indicated that there is no overall site grading proposed for this development. There will be individual lot grading performed on each of the parcels at the time new homes or garages are constructed. G:\Developments. Private\Quail Woods\Review 091208.doc This development is subject to the Bassett Creek Water Management Commission's (BCWMC) Requirements for Improvements and Development Proposals. Based upon the size of this development, the BCWMC policy requires that best management practices for erosion and sediment control be implemented. The developer will be required to submit the plans for the development to the BCWMC for review and comment. There will be no permits for work on the site until approval by the BCWMC is received. This development is also subject to the City of Golden Valley's Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Ordinance. Therefore, the developer or builders will be required to obtain a Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Permit from the City at the time each home or garage is inspected. The best management practices required by the BCWMC will be implemented into these plans. Tree Preservation This development is also subject to the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance. Therefore, individual tree preservation plans and permits will be required at the time of building permit applications. Summary and Recommendations Public Works staff recommends approval of the Quail Woods preliminary plat subject to the comments contained in this review. Approval is also subject to the comments of the Bassett Creek Water Management Commission and other City staff. C: Jeannine Clancy, Director of Public Works Ron Nims, Public Works Project Coordinator Eric Eckman, Public Works Specialist AI Lundstrom, Environmental Coordinator Joe Hogeboom, Planner Mark Kuhnly, Chief of Fire and Inspections Gary Johnson, Building Official Ed Anderson, Deputy Fire Marshal G:\Developments - Private\Quail Woods\Review 091208.doc 'l alley Memorandum Public Works 763.593.8030 I 763.593.3988 (fax) Date: October 13, 2008 From: Mark Grimes, Director of Planning and Development Jeff Oliver, PE, City Enginee~ Quail Woods <<flJ To: Subject: The developer of Quail Woods has submitted a revised Utility Plan based upon the comments contained in the September 12, 2008 Public Works review of the proposed development. Staff has reviewed this plan and has the following comments based upon this review. 1. The proposed sanitary sewer and water services to Lot 3 are now being extended into the lot from Golden Valley Road. The installation of these services will require a permit from the Hennepin County Transportation Department and a Right-of-Way permit from the City of Golden Valley. 2. As discussed in the previous review, the existing water service to the proposed Lot 2 was extended from the water main on Golden Valley Road. Because the service will cross the proposed Lot 3, an easement between the two properties will be required. This easement agreement must provide discussion on maintenance responsibility of the water service, and must be recorded against both properties. The developer must submit a legal description, and a draft easement and maintenance agreement to the Public Works Department for review. The developer will be responsible for costs associated with legal review and recording of this agreement. The agreement must be recorded immediately following approval of the final plat. 3. The proposed sanitary sewer and water services to Lot 1 will be extended into the site from Quail Avenue. Because Quail Avenue was reconstructed in 2006 as part of the City's Pavement Management Program, the restoration of the roadway following installation of the services will be subject to the highest level of pavement restoration contained in the Right-of-Way Ordinance. Therefore, the developer will be required to install the sanitary sewer and water service for Lot 1 during the 2009 construction season, and perform a mill and overlay of Quail Avenue across the frontage of Lot 1. The developer will be required to post a G:\Developments - Private\Quail Woods\Memo 101308.doc $10,000 security to the City for the utility services and pavement restoration prior to approval of the subdivision by the City Council. Public Works staff recommends approval of the proposed Quail Woods subdivision subject to the September 12, 2008 Public Works review, as amended in this memorandum. C: Jeannine Clancy, Director of Public Works Ron Nims, Public Works Project Coordinator Eric Eckman, Public Works Specialist G:\Developments - Private\Quail Woods\Memo 101308.doc Hennepin County Transportation Department 1600 Prairie Drive Medina, MN 55340-5421 612-596-0300, Phone 763-478-4000, FAX 763-478-4030, TOO www.hennepin.us September 11, 2008 Mr. Mark Grimes, Director of Planning City of Golden Valley 7800 Golden Valley Road Golden Valley, Mn 55427 Re: Preliminary Plat - Quail Woods CSAH 66, Southwest Quadrant Quail Avenue North Section 18, Township 29, Range 24 Hennepin County Plat No. 3149 Review and Recommendations Dear Mr. Grimes : Minnesota Statutes 505.02, 505.03, and 462.358, Plats and Surveys, allow up to 30 days for county review of preliminary plats abutting county roads. We reviewed the above plat and offer the following comments: · Hennepin County Transportation finds the plat acceptable as submitted. . Please inform the developer that all proposed construction within county right of way requires an approved Hennepin County permit prior to beginning construction. This includes, but is not limited to driveway and street access, drainage and utility construction, trail development, and landscaping. Appropriate forms can be obtained by contacting our Permits Section at (612) 596-0336. Please direct any response to Dave Zetterstrom at (612) 596-0355. Sincerely, ~~~~ James N. Grube, P.E. Director of Transportation & County Engineer DKZ/sew Cc: Plat Review Committee-Byers I Lindgren I Holtz I Drager I Zetterstrom I Fackler I Lemke Mark Larsen, Hennepin County Surveyor's Office An Equal Opportunity Employer Recycled Paper alley Memorandum Finance 763-593-8013/763-593-8109 (fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting October 21, 2008 Agenda Item 4. B. 1. Public Hearing - Special Assessments - 2008 Pavement Management Program Prepared By Sue Virnig, Finance Director Summary The following resolution needs to be approved for the certification of special assessments for the 2008 Pavement Management Program area. Attachments Project Address List (6 pages) Resolution Adopting and Confirming Assessments for Various Public Improvements in the 2008 Pavement Management Area (2 pages) Recommended Action Motion to adopt Resolution Adopting and Confirming Assessments for Various Public Improvements in the 2008 Pavement Management Area. 2008 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT STREET ASSESSMENT PID 0702924310053 0702924310062 0702924310054 0702924310061 0702924310055 0702924310060 0702924310056 0702924310059 0702924310057 0702924310058 0702924340101 0702924340002 0702924340003 0702924340004 0702924340098 0702924340097 0702924340096 0702924340095 0702924340094 0702924340093 0702924340092 0702924340100 0702924340099 0702924330046 0702924330045 0702924320005 0702924330044 0702924330047 0702924320026 0702924330056 0702924320027 0702924330055 0702924320028 0702924330052 0702924330017 0702924330049 0702924330050 0702924330051 0702924330053 0702924240021 0702924240103 0702924240022 0702924240044 0702924240101 ADDRESS 2900 CHEROKEE PLACE 2901 CHEROKEE PLACE 2912 CHEROKEE PLACE 2913 CHEROKEE PLACE 2924 CHEROKEE PLACE 2925 CHEROKEE PLACE 2936 CHEROKEE PLACE 2937 CHEROKEE PLACE 2940 CHEROKEE PLACE 2941 CHEROKEE PLACE 4715 CULVER ROAD 4747 CULVER ROAD 4801 CULVER ROAD 4815 CULVER ROAD 4827 CULVER ROAD 4901 CULVER ROAD 4907 CULVER ROAD 4915 CULVER ROAD 4927 CULVER ROAD 4937 CULVER ROAD 4947 CULVER ROAD 5001 CULVER ROAD 5015 CULVER ROAD 5027 CULVER ROAD 5037 CULVER ROAD 5038 CULVER ROAD 5047 CULVER ROAD 5305 CULVER ROAD 5320 CULVER ROAD 5325 CULVER ROAD 5360 CULVER ROAD 5365 CULVER ROAD 5380 CULVER ROAD 5385 CULVER ROAD 5125 DAWNVIEW TERRACE 5300 DAWNVIEW TERRACE 5320 DAWNVIEW TERRACE 5360 DAWNVIEW TERRACE 5380 DAWNVIEW TERRACE 4790 DRAKE ROAD 4800 DRAKE ROAD 4801 DRAKE ROAD 4810 DRAKE ROAD 4811 DRAKE ROAD DEFERRED 4,400.00 TOTALS 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 2,200.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 BALANCE 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 8,800.00 2,200.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 PID ADDRESS DEFERRED TOTALS BALANCE 0702924240045 4820 DRAKE ROAD 4,400.00 4,400.00 0702924240048 4821 DRAKE ROAD 4,400.00 4,400.00 0702924240057 4831 DRAKE ROAD 4,400.00 4,400.00 0702924240042 4850 DRAKE ROAD 4,400.00 4,400.00 0702924240046 4901 DRAKE ROAD 4,400.00 4,400.00 0702924240040 4910 DRAKE ROAD 4,400.00 4,400.00 0702924240086 4911 DRAKE ROAD 4,400.00 4,400.00 0702924240009 4920 DRAKE ROAD 4,400.00 4,400.00 0702924240010 4950 DRAKE ROAD 4,400.00 4,400.00 0702924320024 3015 GLENDEN TERRACE 4,400.00 4,400.00 0702924320023 3025 GLEN DEN TERRACE 4,400.00 4,400.00 0702924320017 3030 GLENDEN TERRACE 4,400.00 4,400.00 0702924320022 3035 GLEN DEN TERRACE 4,400.00 4,400.00 0702924320018 3050 GLENDEN TERRACE 4,400.00 4,400.00 0702924320021 3055 GLENDEN TERRACE 4,400.00 4,400.00 0702924320020 3065 GLENDEN TERRACE 4,400.00 4,400.00 0702924320019 3070 GLENDEN TERRACE 4,400.00 4,400.00 0702924320029 2900 LILAC DRIVE NORTH 4,400.00 4,400.00 0702924320001 3100 LILAC DRIVE NORTH 18,684.00 18,684.00 0702924230020 3370-4 LILAC DRIVE NORTH 8,800.00 8,800.00 0702924240018 4965 LOWRY TERRACE 2,200.00 2,200.00 0702924240100 5022 LOWRY TERRACE 4,400.00 4,400.00 0702924240095 5042 LOWRY TERRACE 4,400.00 4,400.00 0702924310104 5051 LOWRY TERRACE 4,400.00 4,400.00 8,800.00 0702924230047 5120 LOWRY TERRACE 4,400.00 4,400.00 0702924230048 5140 LOWRY TERRACE 4,400.00 4,400.00 0702924230051 5220 LOWRY TERRACE 4,400.00 4,400.00 0702924230052 5240 LOWRY TERRACE 4,400.00 4,400.00 0702924230041 5300 LOWRY TERRACE 4,400.00 4,400.00 0702924320035 5315 LOWRY TERRACE 4,400.00 4,400.00 0702924320036 5325 LOWRY TERRACE 4,400.00 4,400.00 0702924230042 5330 LOWRY TERRACE 4,400.00 4,400.00 0702924230043 5340 LOWRY TERRACE 4,400.00 4,400.00 8,800.00 0702924230044 5360 LOWRY TERRACE 4,400.00 4,400.00 0702924230045 5380 LOWRY TERRACE 4,400.00 4,400.00 0702924310018 2901 NOBLE AVENUE NORTH 2,200.00 2,200.00 0702924310073 4900 NORMANDY PLACE 4,400.00 4,400.00 0702924310074 4920 NORMANDY PLACE 4,400.00 4,400.00 0702924310114 4930 NORMANDY PLACE 4,400.00 4,400.00 0702924310113 4940 NORMANDY PLACE 4,400.00 4,400.00 0702924310077 4944 NORMANDY PLACE 4,400.00 4,400.00 0702924310078 4948 NORMANDY PLACE 4,400.00 4,400.00 0702924310019 2900 ORCHARD AVENUE NORTH 2,200.00 2,200.00 0702924310037 2901 ORCHARD AVENUE NORTH 2,200.00 2,200.00 0702924240059 3270 ORCHARD AVENUE NORTH 2,200.00 2,200.00 0702924310038 2900 PERRY AVENUE NORTH 4,400.00 4,400.00 0702924310052 2901 PERRY AVENUE NORTH 4,400.00 4,400.00 PID 0702924310039 0702924310051 0702924310040 0702924310050 0702924310041 0702924310049 0702924310042 0702924310043 0702924310044 0702924310048 0702924310045 0702924310046 0702924310047 0702924310063 0702924310108 0702924310064 0702924320004 0702924310065 0702924320003 0702924310066 0702924310067 0702924320002 0702924310107 0702924310106 0702924310068 0702924310105 0702924310086 0702924310099 0702924310115 0702924310110 0702924310116 0702924310096 0702924310117 0702924310095 0702924310118 0702924240077 0702924240017 0702924240078 0702924240079 0702924240074 0702924240080 0702924240076 0702924240075 0702924240082 0702924240087 0702924240089 0702924240083 ADDRESS 2912 PERRY AVENUE NORTH 2913 PERRY AVENUE NORTH 2924 PERRY AVENUE NORTH 2925 PERRY AVENUE NORTH 2936 PERRY AVENUE NORTH 2937 PERRY AVENUE NORTH 2940 PERRY AVENUE NORTH 2942 PERRY AVENUE NORTH 2944 PERRY AVENUE NORTH 2945 PERRY AVENUE NORTH 3000 PERRY AVENUE NORTH 3016 PERRY AVENUE NORTH 3026 PERRY AVENUE NORTH 2900 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH 2901 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH 2912 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH 2915 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH 2924 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH 2933 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH 2936 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH 2940 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH 2943 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH 3001 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH 3015 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH 3030 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH 3035 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH 3100 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH 3101 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH 3124 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH 3125 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH 3138 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH 3139 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH 3142 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH 3145 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH 3146 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH 3201 QUAil AVENUE NORTH 3250 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH 3251 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH 3260 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH 3261 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH 3270 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH 3271 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH 3281 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH 3300 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH 3301 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH 3307 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH 3312 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH DEFERRED TOTALS 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 2,200.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2/200.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 2,200.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 BALANCE 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 2,200.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 2,200.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 PID 0702924240088 0702924240084 0702924240003 0702924240011 0702924240002 0702924240001 0702924330057 0702924320053 0702924320006 0702924320051 0702924320007 0702924320049 0702924320048 0702924320055 0702924320010 0702924320057 0702924320039 0702924320011 0702924320040 0702924320012 0702924310109 0702924310100 0702924310101 0702924310111 0702924240094 0702924230046 0702924240093 0702924230055 0702924240097 0702924230058 0702924240096 0702924230022 0702924240098 0702924230021 0702924240099 0702924230039 0702924240092 0702924230029 0702924240091 0702924240090 0702924230028 0702924230068 0702924240004 0702924230069 0702924240005 0702924230002 0702924240006 ADDRESS 3315 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH 3320 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH 3345 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH 3350 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH 3355 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH 3365 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH 2885 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 2905 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 2912 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 2915 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 2924 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 2925 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 2935 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 2936 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 2940 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 2945 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 2955 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 3000 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 3005 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 3014 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 3034 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 3100 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 3120 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 3138 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 3206 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 3211 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 3220 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 3221 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 3230 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 3231 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 3240 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 3241 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 3244 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 3245 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 3248 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 3249 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 3300 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 3311 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 3312 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 3320 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 3321 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 3329 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 3330 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 3333 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 3338 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 3345 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 3348 REGENT AVENUE NORTH DEFERRED TOTALS 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 2,200.00 BALANCE 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 2,200.00 PID 0702924230001 0702924330002 0702924330048 0702924330058 0702924320052 0702924320025 0702924320050 0702924320016 0702924320056 0702924320046 0702924320045 0702924320015 0702924230049 0702924230050 0702924230056 0702924230054 0702924230059 0702924230057 0702924230023 0702924230072 0702924230024 0702924230025 0702924230037 0702924230033 0702924230027 0702924230032 0702924230003 0702924230013 0702924230004 0702924230005 0702924230006 0702924230014 0702924230007 0702924230015 0702924230008 0702924230009 0702924230010 0702924230017 0702924230011 0702924230012 0702924310072 0702924320041 0702924320042 0702924320043 0702924320044 0702924320038 0702924320037 ADDRESS 3355 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 2800 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH 2805 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH 2820 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH 2900 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH 2905 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH 2910 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH 3005 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH 3020 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH 3030 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH 3050 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH 3055 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH 3210 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH 3211 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH 3220 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH 3221 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH 3231 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH 3232 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH 3240 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH 3241 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH 3244 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH 3245 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH 3249 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH 3301 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH 3320 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH 3321 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH 3328 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH 3335 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH 3336 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH 3344 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH 3352 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH 3355 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH 3360 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH 3365 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH 3368 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH 3376 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH 3384 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH 3385 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH 3390 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH 3398 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH 4901 TRITON DRIVE 5205 TRITON DRIVE 5225 TRITON DRIVE 5245 TRITON DRIVE 5255 TRITON DRIVE 5310 TRITON DRIVE 5320 TRITON DRIVE DEFERRED TOTALS 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 2,200.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 BALANCE 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 2,200.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 PID ADDRESS DEFERRED TOTALS BALANCE 0702924320014 5325 TRITON DRIVE 4,400.00 4,400.00 0702924320013 5340 TRITON DRIVE 13,419.47 13,419.47 0702924320034 5350 TRITON DRIVE 19,220.85 19,220.85 0702924320033 5385 TRITON DRIVE 4,400.00 4,400.00 0702924240054 4700 33RD AVENUE NORTH 2,200.00 2,200.00 0702924240062 4701 33RD AVENUE NORTH 2,200.00 2,200.00 0702924240060 4721 33RD AVENUE NORTH 4,400.00 4,400.00 0702924240053 4740 33RD AVENUE NORTH 4,400.00 4,400.00 0702924240052 4750 33RD AVENUE NORTH 4,400.00 4,400.00 0702924240050 4806 33RD AVENUE NORTH 4,400.00 4,400.00 0702924240067 4807 33RD AVENUE NORTH 2,200.00 2,200.00 0702924240049 4812 33RD AVENUE NORTH 4,400.00 4,400.00 0702924240066 4831 33RD AVENUE NORTH 4,400.00 4,400.00 0702924240064 4845 33RD AVENUE NORTH 4,400.00 4,400.00 0702924240056 4850 33RD AVENUE NORTH 4,400.00 4,400.00 0702924240058 4910 33RD AVENUE NORTH 4,400.00 4,400.00 0702924240065 4911 33RD AVENUE NORTH 4,400.00 4,400.00 0702924240085 4920 33RD AVENUE NORTH 4,400.00 4,400.00 0702924240081 492733RD AVENUE NORTH 4,400.00 4,400.00 0702924240073 5007 33RD AVENUE NORTH 4,400.00 4,400.00 0702924230040 5139 33RD AVENUE NORTH 4,400.00 4,400.00 0702924230030 5150 33RD AVENUE NORTH 4,400.00 4,400.00 0702924230038 5225-7 33RD AVENUE NORTH 8,800.00 8,800.00 0702924230034 5240 33RD AVENUE NORTH 4,400.00 4,400.00 0702924230031 5300 33RD AVENUE NORTH 8,800.00 8,800.00 0702924230036 5301-3 33RD AVENUE NORTH 8,800.00 8,800.00 0702924230018 5315 33RD AVENUE NORTH 4,400.00 4,400.00 0702924230016 5330 33RD AVENUE NORTH 10,108.80 10,108.80 0702924240007 5001 34TH AVENUE NORTH 2,200.00 2,200.00 0702924330001 DAWNVIEW TERRACE 49,086.60 49,086.60 0702924320054 5300 LOWRY TER 98,038.06 98,038.06 0702924230066 3300 LILAC DRIVE NORTH 5,972.03 5,972.03 TOTALS 13,200.00 1,310,129.81 1,323,329.81 Resolution 08-49 October 21, 2008 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION ADOPTING AND CONFIRMING ASSESSMENTS FOR VARIOUS PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR STREETS IN THE 2008 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT AREA 1. The amount proper and necessary to be specially assessed at this time for various public improvements: Project Years Interest Rate First Year Levy Total Assessed 2008 Pavement 10 7% 2009 $1,310,129.81 Management Area Deferred Assessments $13,200.00 against every assessable lot, piece, or parcel of land affected thereby has been duly calculated upon the basis of benefits, without regard to cash valuation, in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and notice has been duly published, as required by law that this Council would meet to hear, consider and pass upon all objections, if any, and said proposed assessment has at all time since its filing been open for public inspection and an opportunity has been given to all interested persons to present their objections if any, to such proposed assessments. 2. This Council, having heard and considered all objections so presented, finds that each of the lots, pieces and parcels of land enumerated in the proposed assessment was and is specially benefited by the construction of said improvement in not less than the amount of the assessment set opposite the description of each such lot, piece and parcel of land respectively, and such amount so set out is hereby levied against each of the respective lots, pieces and parcels of land therein described. 3. The proposed assessments are hereby adopted and confirmed as the proper assessments for each of said lots, pieces and parcels of land respectively, and the assessment against each parcel, together with interest at the rate of seven (7) percent per annum accruing on the full amount thereof unpaid, shall be a lien concurrent with general taxes upon parcel and all thereof. The total amount of each such assessment not prepaid shall be payable in equal annual principal installments extending over a period of years, as indicated in each case. The first of said installments, together with interest on the entire assessment for the period of January 1,2009 through December 31,2009, will be payable with general taxes for the year of 2008, collectible in 2009, and one of each of the remaining installments, together with one year's interest on that and all other unpaid installments, will be paid with general taxes for each consecutive year thereafter until the entire assessment is paid. Resolution 08-49 - Continued October 21, 2008 4. Prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, the owner of any lot, piece or parcel of land assessed hereby may at any time pay the whole such assessment, with interest to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer, but no interest shall be charged if such payment is made by November 19, 2008. 5. The City Clerk shall, as soon as may be, prepare and transmit to the County Auditor a certified duplicate of the assessment roll, with each installment and interest on each unpaid assessment set forth separately, to be extended upon the proper tax lists of the County and the County Auditor shall thereafter collect said assessment in the manner provided by law. Linda R. Loomis, Mayor ATTEST: Susan M. Virnig, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and her signature attested by the City Clerk. alley M morandum Finance 763-593-8013/763-593-8109 (fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting October 21, 2008 Agenda Item 4. B. 2. Public Hearing - Special Assessments - 2009 Pavement Management Program Prepared By Sue Virnig, Finance Director Summary The following resolution needs to be approved for the certification of special assessments for the 2009 Pavement Management Program area. Attachments Project Address List (7 pages) Resolution Adopting and Confirming Assessments for Various Public Improvements in the 2009 Pavement Management Area (2 pages) Recommended Action Motion to adopt Resolution Adopting and Confirming Assessments for Various Public Improvements in the 2009 Pavement Management Area. 2009 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT STREET ASSESSMENT PID 1802924210001 1802924210066 1802924210002 1802924210003 1802924210004 1802924210005 1802924210046 1802924210006 1802924210047 1802924210018 1802924210048 1802924210049 1802924210019 1802924210050 1802924210032 1802924210051 1802924210033 1802924210052 0702924340092 0702924340100 0702924330044 0702924340018 0702924340017 0702924340046 0702924340016 0702924340015 0702924340045 0702924340044 0702924340014 0702924340043 0702924340013 0702924340012 0702924340042 0702924340041 0702924340011 0702924340040 0702924340010 0702924340039 0702924340009 0702924340038 0702924340008 0702924340007 0702924340006 0702924330005 0702924330040 0702924330004 ADDRESS 4700 BASSETT CREEK DRIVE 4735 BASSETT CREEK DRIVE 4740 BASSETT CREEK DRIVE 4780 BASSETT CREEK DRIVE 4800 BASSETT CREEK DRIVE 4840 BASSETT CREEK DRIVE 4865 BASSETT CREEK DRIVE 4880 BASSETT CREEK DRIVE 4895 BASSETT CREEK DRIVE 4900 BASSETT CREEK DRIVE 4905 BASSETT CREEK DRIVE 4925 BASSETT CREEK DRIVE 4950 BASSETT CREEK DRIVE 4975 BASSETT CREEK DRIVE 5000 BASSETT CREEK DRIVE 5005 BASSETT CREEK DRIVE 5050 BASSETT CREEK DRIVE 5055 BASSETT CREEK DRIVE 4947 CULVER ROAD 5001 CULVER ROAD 5047 CULVER ROAD 4700 DAWNVIEW TERRACE 4750 DAWNVIEW TERRACE 4751 DAWNVIEW TERRACE 4760 DAWNVIEW TERRACE 4800 DAWNVIEW TERRACE 4801 DAWNVIEW TERRACE 4821 DAWNVIEW TERRACE 4830 DAWNVIEW TERRACE 4851 DAWNVIEW TERRACE 4860 DAWNVIEW TERRACE 4900 DAWNVIEW TERRACE 4901 DAWNVIEW TERRACE 4905 DAWNVIEW TERRACE 4910 DAWNVIEW TERRACE 4915 DAWNVIEW TERRACE 4920 DAWNVIEW TERRACE 4925 DAWNVIEW TERRACE 4930 DAWNVIEW TERRACE 4935 DAWNVIEW TERRACE 4950 DAWNVIEW TERRACE 5010 DAWNVIEWTERRACE 5020 DAWNVIEW TERRACE 5030 DAWNVIEW TERRACE 5035 DAWNVIEW TERRACE 5040 DAWNVIEW TERRACE DEFERRED TOTALS 2,200.00 31,180.48 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 BALANCE 2,200.00 31,180.48 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 PID 0702924330039 0702924340047 0702924340056 0702924340048 0702924340057 0702924340049 0702924340058 0702924340050 0702924340059 0702924340051 0702924340060 0702924340061 0702924340052 0702924340062 0702924340053 0702924340054 0702924340055 1802924310075 1802924310076 0702924330025 0702924330021 0702924330020 0702924330024 0702924330019 0702924330023 0702924340084 0702924340078 0702924340085 0702924340077 0702924340086 0702924340076 0702924340087 0702924340075 0702924340074 0702924330027 0702924330028 0702924330032 0702924330029 0702924330031 1802924240047 1802924240063 1802924210057 1802924210058 1802924240077 1802924210059 1802924210064 1802924210060 1802924210061 ADDRESS 5045 DAWNVIEW TERRACE 4750 DONA LANE 4751 DONA LANE 4800 DONA LANE 4801 DONA LANE 4850 DONA LANE 4851 DONA LANE 4860 DONA LANE 4861 DONA LANE 4900 DONA LANE 4901 DONA LANE 4905 DONA LANE 4910 DONA LANE 4915 DONA LANE 4920 DONA LANE 4950 DONA LANE 4960 DONA LANE 4960 DULUTH STREET 4962 DULUTH STREET 5000 HAMPTON ROAD 5005 HAMPTON ROAD 5025 HAMPTON ROAD 5050 HAMPTON ROAD 5105 HAMPTON ROAD 5110 HAMPTON ROAD 4725 MARIE LANE EAST 4750 MARIE LANE EAST 4755 MARIE LANE EAST 4800 MARIE LANE EAST 4801 MARIE LANE EAST 4810 MARIE LANE EAST 4811 MARIE LANE EAST 4820 MARIE LANE EAST 4900 MARIE LANE EAST 5005 MARIE LANE WEST 5055 MARIE LANE WEST 5100 MARIE LANE WEST 5125 MARIE LANE WEST 5150 MARIE LANE WEST 4800 MARKAY RIDGE 4805 MARKAY RIDGE 4810 MARKAY RIDGE 4820 MARKAY RIDGE 4825 MARKAY RIDGE 4840 MARKAY RIDGE 4855 MARKAY RIDGE 4860 MARKAY RIDGE 4900 MARKAY RIDGE DEFERRED TOTALS 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 BALANCE 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 PID ADDRESS DEFERRED TOTALS BALANCE 1802924210062 4930 MARKAY RIDGE 4,400.00 4,400.00 1802924210063 4940 MARKAY RIDGE 4,400.00 4,400.00 1802924220186 5100 MINNAQUA DRIVE 4,400.00 4,400.00 1802924220185 5101 MINNAQUA DRIVE 4,400.00 4,400.00 1802924220187 5110 MINNAQUA DRIVE 4,400.00 4,400.00 1802924220188 5120 MINNAQUA DRIVE 4,400.00 4,400.00 1802924230020 5125 MINNAQUA DRIVE 4,400.00 4,400.00 8,800.00 1802924220189 5126 MINNAQUA DRIVE 4,400.00 4,400.00 1802924230019 5129 MINNAQUA DRIVE 4,400.00 4,400.00 8,800.00 1802924220190 5130 MINNAQUA DRIVE 4,400.00 4,400.00 1802924240008 2107 NOBLE AVENUE NORTH 2,200.00 2,200.00 0702924340102 2841 NOBLE AVENUE NORTH 2,200.00 2,200.00 1802924240068 2055 ORCHARD AVENUE NORTH 4,400.00 4,400.00 1802924240067 2121 ORCHARD AVENUE NORTH 4,400.00 4,400.00 1802924240066 2135 ORCHARD AVENUE NORTH 4,400.00 4,400.00 1802924240043 2136 ORCHARD AVENUE NORTH 4,400.00 4,400.00 1802924240065 2143 ORCHARD AVENUE NORTH 4,400.00 4,400.00 1802924240044 2148 ORCHARD AVENUE NORTH 4,400.00 4,400.00 1802924240064 2157 ORCHARD AVENUE NORTH 4,400.00 4,400.00 1802924240045 2160 ORCHARD AVENUE NORTH 4,400.00 4,400.00 1802924240046 2200 ORCHARD AVENUE NORTH 4,400.00 4,400.00 0702924340083 2700 ORCHARD AVENUE NORTH 4,400.00 4,400.00 0702924340082 2710 ORCHARD AVENUE NORTH 4,400.00 4,400.00 0702924340081 2750 ORCHARD AVENUE NORTH 4,400.00 4,400.00 0702924340080 2770 ORCHARD AVENUE NORTH 4,400.00 4,400.00 0702924340079 2790 ORCHARD AVENUE NORTH 4,400.00 4,400.00 1802924240014 1960 ORDWAY 4,400.00 4,400.00 8,800.00 1802924240013 2000 ORDWAY 4,400.00 4,400.00 1802924240012 2018 ORDWAY 4,400.00 4,400.00 1802924240011 2030 ORDWAY 4,400.00 4,400.00 1802924240069 2035 ORDWAY 4,400.00 4,400.00 1802924240010 2050 ORDWAY 4,400.00 4,400.00 1802924240009 2070 ORDWAY 4,400.00 4,400.00 1802924240042 2075 ORDWAY 4,400.00 4,400.00 1802924240041 2091 ORDWAY 2,200.00 2,200.00 1802924240084 2107 PERRY AVENUE NORTH 4,400.00 4,400.00 1802924240071 2110 PERRY AVENUE NORTH 4,400.00 4,400.00 1802924240083 2117 PERRY AVENUE NORTH 4,400.00 4,400.00 1802924240072 2120 PERRY AVENUE NORTH 4,400.00 4,400.00 1802924240082 2131 PERRY AVENUE NORTH 4,400.00 4,400.00 1802924240073 2134 PERRY AVENUE NORTH 4,400.00 4,400.00 1802924240081 2141 PERRY AVENUE NORTH 4,400.00 4,400.00 1802924240074 2142 PERRY AVENUE NORTH 4,400.00 4,400.00 1802924240080 2151 PERRY AVENUE NORTH 4,400.00 4,400.00 1802924240075 2154 PERRY AVENUE NORTH 4,400.00 4,400.00 1802924240079 2163 PERRY AVENUE NORTH 4,400.00 4,400.00 1802924240076 2164 PERRY AVENUE NORTH 4,400.00 4,400.00 1802924240078 2203 PERRY AVENUE NORTH 4,400.00 4,400.00 PID 1802924210007 1802924210017 1802924210008 1802924210016 1802924210009 1802924210015 1802924210010 1802924210014 1802924210012 1802924210013 0702924340091 0702924340069 0702924340090 0702924340070 0702924340089 0702924340071 0702924340088 0702924340072 0702924340073 1802924210020 1802924210031 1802924210021 1802924210030 1802924210022 1802924210029 1802924210023 1802924210028 1802924210024 1802924210027 1802924210025 1802924210026 0702924340068 0702924340036 0702924340067 0702924340035 0702924340066 0702924340034 0702924340065 0702924340033 0702924340064 0702924340032 0702924340063 0702924340031 0702924340029 0702924340028 0702924340027 0702924340037 0702924340026 ADDRESS 2440 PERRY AVENUE NORTH 2445 PERRY AVENUE NORTH 2480 PERRY AVENUE NORTH 2485 PERRY AVENUE NORTH 2500 PERRY AVENUE NORTH 2505 PERRY AVENUE NORTH 2540 PERRY AVENUE NORTH 2545 PERRY AVENUE NORTH 2580 PERRY AVENUE NORTH 2585 PERRY AVENUE NORTH 2600 PERRY AVENUE NORTH 2605 PERRY AVENUE NORTH 2620 PERRY AVENUE NORTH 2625 PERRY AVENUE NORTH 2640 PERRY AVENUE NORTH 2655 PERRY AVENUE NORTH 2670 PERRY AVENUE NORTH 2675 PERRY AVENUE NORTH 2695 PERRY AVENUE NORTH 2430 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH 2445 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH 2460 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH 2475 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH 2490 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH 2495 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH 2500 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH 2505 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH 2540 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH 2545 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH 2580 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH 2585 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH 2600 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH 2605 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH 2620 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH 2625 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH 2640 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH 2655 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH 2670 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH 2675 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH 2680 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH 2685 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH 2700 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH 2735 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH 2745 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH 2755 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH 2765 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH 2770 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH 2775 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH DEFERRED TOTALS 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 BALANCE 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 PID 1802924310005 1802924310003 1802924320044 1802924230067 1802924230007 1802924230006 1802924230004 1802924230003 1802924230001 1802924240055 1802924240056 1802924240057 1802924230061 1802924240058 1802924240059 1802924230060 1802924240060 1802924220184 1802924210067 1802924210068 1802924220183 1802924220182 1802924220181 1802924210034 1802924220180 1802924210035 1802924220179 1802924210036 1802924220178 1802924210037 1802924220177 1802924210038 1802924220176 1802924210039 1802924220175 1802924210040 1802924220174 0702924340019 0702924340020 0702924340021 0702924330026 0702924340022 0702924340023 0702924340024 0702924330033 0702924340025 0702924330034 0702924330037 ADDRESS 1900 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 1920 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 1931 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 1941-3 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 1951 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 2001 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 2021 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 2101 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 2115 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 2120 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 2132 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 2144 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 2157 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 2160 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 2200 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 2201 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 2224 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 2225 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 2244 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 2260 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 2285 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 2355 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 2405 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 2420 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 2425 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 2440 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 2445 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 2460 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 2465 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 2480 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 2485 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 2500 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 2505 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 2540 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 2545 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 2580 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 2585 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 2600 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 2650 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 2660 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 2665 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 2670 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 2680 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 2700 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 2705 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 2720 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 2725 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 2740 REGENT AVENUE NORTH DEFERRED TOTALS 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 8,800.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 BALANCE 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 8,800.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 4,400.00 PID ADDRESS DEFERRED TOTALS BALANCE 0702924330035 2745 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 4,400.00 4,400.00 0702924330038 2750 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 4,400.00 4,400.00 0702924330015 2775 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 4,400.00 4,400.00 0702924330003 2805 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 4,400.00 4,400.00 0702924330057 2885 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 2,200.00 2,200.00 0702924330018 2600 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH 4,400.00 4,400.00 0702924330022 2660 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH 4,400.00 4,4QO.OO 0702924330030 2670 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH 4,400.00 4,400.00 0702924330009 2675 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH 4,400.00 4,400.00 0702924330010 2685 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH 4,400.00 4,400.00 0702924330011 2725 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH 4,400.00 4,400.00 0702924330012 2735 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH 4,400.00 4,400.00 0702924330036 2740 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH 4,400.00 4,400.00 0702924330013 2745 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH 4,400.00 4,400.00 0702924330014 2755 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH 4,400.00 4,400.00 1802924240015 4835 SORELL AVENUE 4,400.00 4,400.00 1802924240024 4840 SORELL AVENUE 4,400.00 4,400.00 1802924240016 4875 SORELL AVENUE 4,400.00 4,400.00 1802924240025 4880 SORELL AVENUE 4,400.00 4,400.00 1802924240026 4920 SORELL AVENUE 4,400.00 4,400.00 1802924240017 4925 SORELL AVENUE 4,400.00 4,400.00 1802924240018 4935 SORELL AVENUE 4,400.00 4,400.00 1802924240028 4936 SORELL AVENUE 4,400.00 4,400.00 1802924240031 4944 SORELL AVENUE 4,400.00 4,400.00 1802924240019 4945 SORELL AVENUE 4,400.00 4,400.00 1802924240020 4955 SORELL AVENUE 4,400.00 4,4QO.00 1802924240032 4960 SORELL AVENUE 4,400.00 4,400.00 1802924240021 4975 SORELL AVENUE 4,400.00 4,400.00 1802924240034 4980 SORELL AVENUE 4,400.00 4,400.00 1802924240023 4835 WESTBEND ROAD 4,400.00 4,400.00 1802924240070 4840 WESTBEND ROAD 4,400.00 4,400.00 1802924240022 4875 WESTBEND ROAD 4,400.00 4,400.00 1802924240085 4920 WESTBEND ROAD 4,400.00 4,400.00 1802924240027 4925 WESTBEND ROAD 4,400.00 4,400.00 1802924240029 4935 WESTBEND ROAD 4,400.00 4,400.00 1802924240030 4945 WESTBEND ROAD 4,400.00 4,400.00 1802924240033 4955 WESTBEND ROAD 4,400.00 4,400.00 1802924230002 5000 WESTBEND ROAD 2,200.00 2,200.00 1802924240086 2100 WINDSOR WAY 4,400.00 4,400.00 1802924240054 2107 WINDSOR WAY 4,400.00 4,400.00 8,800.00 1802924240087 2110 WINDSOR WAY 4,400.00 4,400.00 1802924240053 2117 WINDSOR WAY 4,400.00 4,400.00 1802924240088 2120 WINDSOR WAY 4,400.00 4,400.00 1802924240052 2131 WINDSOR WAY 4,400.00 4,400.00 1802924240089 2132 WINDSOR WAY 4,400.00 4,400.00 1802924240051 2143 WINDSOR WAY 4,400.00 4,400.00 1802924240090 2144 WINDSOR WAY 4,400.00 4,400.00 1802924240050 2157 WINDSOR WAY 4,400.00 4,400.00 PID ADDRESS DEFERRED TOTALS BALANCE 1802924240091 2160 WINDSOR WAY 4,400.00 4,400.00 1802924240092 2200 WINDSOR WAY 4,400.00 4,400.00 1802924240049 2201 WINDSOR WAY 4,400.00 4,400.00 1802924240048 2223 WINDSOR WAY 4,400.00 4,400.00 1802924210065 2224 WINDSOR WAY 4,400.00 4,400.00 8,800.00 0702924330016 5115 DAWNVIEWTERRACE 6,228.00 6,228.00 1802924210053 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 5,985.11 5,985.11 1802924230005 2021 REGENT AVENUE NORTH 19,313.03 19,313.03 1802924320045 1856 TOLEDO AVENUE NORTH 7,940.70 7,940.70 1802924240035 4981 WESTBEND ROAD 20,850.72 20,850.72 0702924330006 2605 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH 6,228.00 6,228.00 0702924330007 2655 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH 6,228.00 6,228.00 0702924330008 2665 SCOTT AVENUE NORTH 6,228.00 6,228.00 22,000.00 1,368,582.04 1,390,582.04 Resolution 08-50 October 21, 2008 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION ADOPTING AND CONFIRMING ASSESSMENTS FOR VARIOUS PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR STREETS IN THE 2009 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT AREA 1. The amount proper and necessary to be specially asses.sed at this time for various public improvements: Proiect Years Interest Rate First Year Levy Total Assessed 2009 Pavement 10 7% 2010 $1,368,582.04 Management Area Deferred Assessments $22,000.00 against every assessable lot, piece, or parcel of land affected thereby has been duly calculated upon the basis of benefits, without regard to cash valuation, in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and notice has been duly published, as required by law that this Council would meet to hear, consider and pass upon all objections, if any, and said proposed assessment has at all time since its filing been open for public inspection and an opportunity has been given to all interested persons to present their objections if any, to such proposed assessments. 2. This Council, having heard and considered all objections so presented, finds that each of the lots, pieces and parcels of land enumerated in the proposed assessment was and is specially benefited by the construction of said improvement in not less than the amount of the assessment set opposite the description of each such lot, piece and parcel of land respectively, and such amount so set out is hereby levied against each of the respective lots, pieces and parcels of land therein described. 3. The proposed assessments are hereby adopted and confirmed as the proper assessments for each of said lots, pieces and parcels of land respectively, and the assessment against each parcel, together with interest at the rate of seven (7) percent per annum accruing on the full amount thereof unpaid, shall be a lien concurrent with general taxes upon parcel and all thereof. The total amount of each such assessment not prepaid shall be payable in equal annual principal installments extending over a period of years, as indicated in each case. The first of said installments, together with interest on the entire assessment for the period of January 1, 2010 through December 31, 2010, will be payable with general taxes for the year of 2009, collectible in 2010, and one of each of the remaining installments, together with one year's interest on that and all other unpaid installments, will be paid with general taxes for each consecutive year thereafter until the entire assessment is paid. Resolution 08-50 - Continued October 21, 2008 4. Prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, the owner of any lot, piece or parcel of land assessed hereby may at any time pay the whole such assessment, with interest to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer, but no interest shall be charged if such payment is made by November 18, 2009. 5. The City Clerk shall, as soon as may be, prepare and transmit to the County Auditor a certified duplicate of the assessment roll, with each installment and interest on each unpaid assessment set forth separately, to be extended upon the proper tax lists of the County and the County Auditor shall thereafter collect said assessment in the manner provided by law. Linda R. Loomis, Mayor ATTEST: Susan M. Virnig, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and her signature attested by the City Clerk.