12-13-11 Special CC Agenda Packet AGENDA
Special Meeting
of the
City Council
Golden Valley City Hall
7800 Golden Valley Road
Council Chamber
December 13, 2011
7 pm
1. CALL TO ORDER PAGES
A. Roll Call
2. PUBLIC HEARINGS 7 PM
A. Public Hearing - 2012 Pavement Management Program -Addition of Turners 2-30
Crossroad
1. Ordering Construction of Public Improvement and Advertising for Bids 11-72 31
2. Rescinding Portion of Resolution 89-66 Modifying Parking Restrictions 11-73 32-33
B. Public Hearing - Special Assessments - 2012 Pavement Management Area 11-74 34-38
break
C. Public Hearing - Street Reconstruction - Harold Avenue, Glenwood Avenue to 39-87
Winnetka Avenue, and Rhode Island Avenue North, Harold Avenue and Trunk
Highway 55
1. Ordering Construction of Public Improvement and Advertising for Bids 11-75 88
2. Restricting Parking on Harold Avenue between Winnetka Avenue North and 89
Glenwood Avenue 11-76
D. Public Hearing - Special Assessments - Harold Avenue and Rhode Island Avenue 90-93
North Street Reconstruction 11-77
3. ADJOURNMENT
�� � � � �..
Ct�,������a�
.� Public Works
o : . � ae
763-593-8030/763-593-3988 (fax)
Executive Summary For Action
Golden Valley Special City Council Meeting
December 13, 2011
Agenda Item
2. A. Public Hearing Amending City Public Improvements Project No. 12-01, 2012 Pavement
Management Program, by Adding Turners Crossroad
Prepared By
Jeannine Clancy, Director of Public Works
Jeff Oliver, PE, City Engineer
Summary
At its October 20, 2009 meeting, the City Council directed staff to prepare a feasibility report
for the 2011 and 2012 Pavement Management Program (PMP). The feasibility report for
these projects included_rehabilitation of 1.2 miles of streets in 2011, and 1.1 miles of street in
2012. The original 2012 PMP included Turners Crossroad between Golden Hills Drive and I-
394 for reconstruction. However, the feasibility report recommended removal of Turners
Crossroad from the project due to the uncertainty of the location of the Metropolitan Council
Environmental Services (MCES) 1-GV-461 Reliever project. The City Council authorized the
2012 PMP at its November 16, 2010 meeting without Turners Crossroads as part of the
project.
The MCES has finalized the location of the 1-GV-461 Reliever along Circle Down and
Turners Crossroad between Circle Down and Golden Hills Drive, to be constructed as part of
the 2012 PMP. Therefore, the City Council authorized an amendment to the feasibility report
for the 2012 PMP at its June 21, 2011 meeting to include the subject portion of Turners
Crossroad in the 2012 PMP. The amendment to the feasibility report has been completed by
the consulting engineering firm of SEH, Inc. and will be presented at the public hearing.
The estimated cost for reconstruction of the Turners Crossroad between Circle Down and
Interstate 394, and the amended total cost for the 2012 PMP are as follows:
Estimated Total Turners Crossroads Cost = $ 421,000
Estimated 2012 PMP Cost Amended = $3,071,000
The estimated project costs include all construction costs for street reconstruction, storm
sewer modifications and sanitary sewer and watermain work. An estimated 30% of the
construction costs have been included far indirect project costs, which includes project
design, staking, construction observation, administration and legal expenses.
The properties being specially assessed on Turners Crossroad are all commercial and office
buildings, and are therefore assessed at the "Other Zonings, Local Street" as established in
the Special Assessment Policy and annual Fee Ordinance of$91.73 per front foot.
As outlined in the amended feasibility report, the width of Turners Crossroads will be
narrowed as part of this project. The proposed widths include a 32-foot wide street for the
majority of Turners Crossroads. However, it is proposed to increase the width to 36 feet on
the west side of the street from the centerline of Circle Down to a point 200 feet south of
Circle Down to permit parking for trucks utilizing the loading docks at the office building on
the west side of Turners Crossroad. There is currently no parking permitted on the Turners
Crossroad within the limits of this project. Therefore, a resolution modifying parking
restrictions on Turners Crossroad is proposed.
Following authorization by the City Council to amend the approved 2012 Pavement
Management Project to include Turners Crossroad between Circle Down and Interstate 394,
the anticipated schedule for the 2012 PMP is as follows:
Open Bids for 2012 PMP February/March 2012
Begin Construction 2012 PMP Spring 2012
Project Completion 2012 PMP Fall 2012
Attachments
Project Location Map (1 page)
Amendment to the Feasibility Report for the 2011 and 2012 Pavement Management
Program, to Include Turners Crossroad South (26 pages)
Resolution Ordering Construction of Certain Proposed Public Improvements and Authorizing
Advertising for Bids for City Improvement Project 12-01, 2012 Pavement Management
Program as Amended by the Addition of Turners Crossroads (1 page)
Resolution 89-66, Resolution Restricting Parking on Turners Crossroad (1 page)
Resolution Rescinding Portions of Resolution 89-66 to Modify Parking Restrictions on
Turners Crossroad (1 page)
Recommended Action
1. Conduct a Public Hearing to City Improvement Project 12-01 to include Turners
Crossroad befinreen Circle Down and Interstate 394.
2. Motion to adopt Resolution Ordering Construction of Certain Proposed Public
Improvements and Authorizing Advertising for Bids for City Improvement Project 12-01
as Amended by the Addition of Turner Crossroad.
3. Motion to adopt Resolution Rescinding Portions of Resolution 89-66 to Modify Parking
Restrictions on Turners Crossroad.
ona . av�s
Community Center _ �'�dc
enwood Ave
� � C�Unty Ra 4p �.�. � ` <
� y
m ° ��
� Q
V �,� Turnpik� �
��r°' ''c y a 3 'yh.
� � J ��
O � �
� N
H
O
�L1 ___
V
�, � - - �' Colonial Dr
L
� �
L ' ��
I"' <
� �j•
Laurel Ave �'
Turnpike
R
�� � � 4'
son Rd �pike Rd
O
Golden Hilis Dr
N
� Circle Down
0
?. n
� N
,y o
L
� N l�i��@�/
N �
c
L
�
�����������������������'.�������}
I �aw,�,:,,,rmu.. . ...
I
. . ._.. . ,..: .,.., .�,_, � ,.. ' • ....� . .. .. ... "
<< Hwy 394 � .
--------------
-��,..�. _ -------------�
� S �rantage Rd ;
A .�� I
� �
� ,
�
�A c ( q����
�e , �
�` �
9� �
�
�
�
�
�
Location Map e
2012 PMP - Turners Crossroad S. NottoScale
. ,rs
rtl
o �en e
Amendment to the Feasibility Report
for the 2011 and 2012 Pavement
Management Program.
To Include Turne�s Crossroad South
City of Golden Valley, Minnesota
City Project No. 12-1
SEH No. GOLDV 110544
November 4, 2011
This Page Left Blank Intentionally
Turners Crossroad South
Feasibility Report
City of Golden Valley, Minnesota
City Project No. 12-1
SEH No. GOLDV 110544
November 4, 2011
I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision,
and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of
Minnesota.
������
Daniel P. Erickson,PE
Date:November 4,2011 Lic.No.: 46661
Reviewed by: ���"�'�•••
Date
Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc.
3535 Vadnais Center Drive
Saint Paul, MN 55110-5196
651.490.2000
This Page Left Blank Intentionally
TABLE OF CONTENTS �
Page
Introduction...............................................................................................................................1
ProjectLegal Description.........................................................................................................1
ExistingConditions..................................................................................................................1
SanitarySewer............................................................................................................................ 1
WaterMain................................................................................................................................. 1
StormWater Drainage................................................................................................................2
Streets..........................................................................................................................................2
StreetWidths...........................................................................................................................2
PavementSections ..................................................................................................................2
SubgradeConditions...............................................................................................................2
ConcreteCurb and Gutter...................................................................................................... 2
PedestrianFacilities...............................................................................................................2
StreetLighting.........................................................................................................................2
Proposed Improvements..........................................................................................................3
PublicParticipatzon................................................................................................................ 3
SanitarySewer and Water Main.................................................................................................3
Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation................................................................................................ 3
WaterMain Rehabilitation ..................................................................................................... 3
StormWater Management.......................................................................................................... 3
WaterQuality Measures.........................................................................................................4
Streets..........................................................................................................................................4
StreetWidths...........................................................................................................................4
SubgradeCorrections.............................................................................................................4
ConcreteCuYb and Gutter......................................................................................................4
PedestrianFacilities.................................................................................................................... 5
StreetLighting............................................................................................................................ 5
Tree and Landscape Impacts....................................................................................................... 5
Estimated Costs and Project Financing..................................................................................5
EstimatedProject Costs.............................................................................................................. 5
Sewerand Water Costs........................................................................................................... 5
StormDrainage Costs............................................................................................................. 6
Street Reconstruction Costs.................................................................................................... 6
TotalProject Costs................................................................................................................. 6
Proposed Project Financing........................................................................................................ 7
SpecialAssessments................................................................................................................7
Sewer and Water Reserve Fund.............................................................................................. 7
Storm Sewer Improvement Fund............................................................................................. 8
StreetImprovement Funds...................................................................................................... 8
FinancingSummary................................................................................................................ 8
Summaryand Recommendations............................................................................................8
UtilityImprovements...............................................................................................................9
Storm Drainage bnprovements............................................................................................... 9
i
StreetImprovements................................................................................................................ 9
Recommendations..................................................................................................................10
Exhibit 1 Project Location Map
Exhibit 2 Proposed Project Layout
Exhibit 3 Existing Street Widths
Exhibit 4 Proposed Street Widths
Appendix A— Preliminary Special Assessment Roll
ii
Introduction
At its June 21, 2011 meeting, the Golden Valley City Council authorized amending the 2011
and 2012 PMP feasibility report to include Turners Crossroad South. The proposed
improvements to the commercial roadway begin at the south end of Turners Crossroad South
at Interstate 394 and extend north to the intersection with Circle Down. The location of these
proposed improvements are shown on Exhibit 1: Project Location Map.
Turners Crossroad South was originally part of the 2012 PMP, but was removed from the
project due to the possible Metropolitan Council of Environmental Services (MCES) reliever
route along Turners Crossroad South. Another location for the reliever route was ultimately
chosen, so the proposed reconstruction project along Turners Crossroad is being discussed
separately in this report.
The proposed improvements will be included with the 2012 PMP bidding documents. This
feasibility report will discuss the existing conditions of the streets, sanitary sewer, water mains,
and storm sewer within the project area. In addition, the report will discuss the proposed
project design, estimated project costs, and the proposed financing, including a preliminary
special assessment roll.
Proiect Leqal Description
The proposed project includes:
All properties in Section 30, Township 29, Range 24; within the City of Go/den Valley,
Hennepin County, Minnesota, that are adjacent to the following streets:
• Turners Crossroad South from Interstate 394 to Circle Down
All properties in Section 4, Township 117, Range 21; within the City of Go/den Valley,
Hennepin County, Minnesota, that are adjacent to the following streets:
• Turners Crossroad South from Interstate 394 to Circle Down
Existinq Conditions
Sanitarv Sewer
The existing sanitary sewer main along Turners Crossroad South is 12 inch diameter
reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) which was constructed in the 1950's. Two lateral lines drain
into this main within the project limits, a 12 inch diameter RCP at the alley north of the
Metropolitan and a nine inch diameter clay pipe at Circle Down. The main flows north along
Turners Crossroad and continues beyond the project limits.
Water Main
Existing water main along Turners Crossroad South is 12 inch diameter cast iron pipe. Three
additional eight inch diameter mains extend east from the 12 inch main. All of the existing
water main within the project area is located within City-owned right of way and was installed
1
during the 1960's with exception of the portion heading east along the alley, which was
installed in the 1980's.
Storm Water Drainaqe
The project area falls within the Sweeney Lake sub-district of the Bassett Creek Watershed.
Storm water runoff along Turners Crossroad South is collected into mid-block catch basins and
conveyed north in the existing storm sewer system to the trunk storm sewer system at the
Turners Crossroad South/Radisson Road intersection. The trunk storm sewer flows north
along Turners Crossroad and discharges into the ponding system at Glenwood and Xenia
Avenues, through the Breck ponds, eventually discharging into Sweeney Lake. Existing
reinforced concrete storm sewer pipe in the project area varies in size from 12 to 18 inches.
Streets
Turners Crossroad South is a commercial street that was originally constructed in the early
1960's.
Street Widths
Existing street widths on Turners Crossroad South vary from 46 to 64 feet. Street
widths are measured from gutter flow line to gutter flow line, or from edge of pavement
to edge of pavement in the portions without curb and gutter. A map showing locations
and existing widths is located in Exhibit 3: Existing Street Widths.
Pavement Sections
Turners Crossroad South has an existing bituminous pavement depth of 10.5 inches.
Beneath the bituminous is fill material comprised of sand with silt, or silty sand with
graveL
Subqrade Conditions
The soil boring taken in the project area indicates that the subgrade soils (beneath the
base or sub base) include silty sand fill along with gravely deposits above coarse
alluvium deposits. The subgrade soils in the project area would be considered marginal
to good quality granular fill soils.
Concrete Curb and Gutter
Turners Crossroad South contains mostly bituminous curb with some areas of concrete
curb and gutter at side road and driveway radii.
Pedestrian Facilities
Concrete sidewalk is located along both sides of Turners Crossroad South beginning at
the Circle Down intersection and extending south approximately 425 feet. Existing
sidewalk continues north beyond the Circle Down intersection along both sides of the
street.
Street Liqhtin_q
No street lighting exists within the project area.
2
Proposed Improvements
This portion of the feasibility report will focus on the proposed design of the project. The
estimated project costs and project financing will be discussed later in this report.
Public Participation
Representatives from the City will be meeting individually with property owners and
businesses affected by the project. This will be an opportunity to explain the proposed
improvements and gather any feedback or concerns that property owners may have
about the proposed project.
The proposed improvements discussed in this portion of the feasibility report are shown on
Exhibit 2: Proposed Project Layout.
Sanitarv Sewer and Water Main
The MCES 1-GV-461 reliever route will be constructed in the Circle Down portion of the 2012
PMP and is planned to run adjacent to this portion of the project. The route is planned to come
from south of the east end of Circle Down, continue west along Circle Down, turn north at
Turners Crossroad, and continue west along Golden Hills Drive.
Sanitarv Sewer Rehabilitation
A television inspection of the existing municipal sanitary sewer system was perFormed
during the preliminary design portion of the project and identified a short section of
sewer main in need of repair. The nature of the defects present, primarily cracked pipes
and root intrusion, indicates that the main can be rehabilitated by structural lining.
In addition to lining the damaged sanitary sewer mains, this project will incorporate
other measures to reduce the amount of Inflow and Infiltration (I/I) being introduced into
the City's sewer main system. These I/I reduction efforts include the replacement of all
sanitary sewer manhole castings and covers, and the reconstruction of deteriorating
sanitary sewer manholes. These measures have been implemented in past PMP
projects, and are consistent with the City's efforts to address all sources of I/I.
Water Main Rehabilitation
Proposed water main improvements for the project include hydrant sandblasting and
painting, as well as adjustments to gate valves and gate valve manholes.
Storm Water Manaqement
The project is located within the Sweeney Lake drainage sub-district of the Bassett Creek
Watershed. Therefore, the project will be designed in accordance with the Bassett Creek
Water Management Commission (BCWMC) Requirements for Improvements and
Development Proposals. This includes the implementation of storm water best management
practices (BMPs) as part of the project design and during construction.
The proposed storm sewer improvements for the project area include replacing catch basins
and storm sewer leads, replacing all castings, and reconstructing deteriorating manholes. The
3
proposed storm drainage improvements within the project area are shown on Exhibit 2:
Proposed Project Layout.
Water Qualitv Measures
The minimization of impervious surfaces such as pavement, which generate higher
volumes of storm water runoff than vegetated pervious surfaces, is a key goal of project
design. Existing impervious areas, post construction impervious areas, and the amount
of decrease in impervious area for the proposed project is shown below.
Post
Construction Decrease of %Reduction of
Existing Impervious Impervious Area Impervious Area Impervious
Area(acres) (acres) (acres) Area
0.72 0.55 0.17 23.6%
Streets
This section of the report will discuss proposed reconstruction measures for Turners
Crossroad South, as well as the structural concerns encountered during preliminary design.
Street Widths
The proposed street width Turners Crossroad South varies between 32 feet and 36 feet
measured from face to face of gutter.
There is currently no parking along both sides of Turners Crossroad. There is a need
for truck parking along the west side of Turners Crossroad for the loading docks for the
office building on the west side of the roadway(Colonnade). The 36 foot face to face
width will provide adequate room for truck parking. A resolution will need to be passed
modifying the 1989 resolution restricting parking to allow parking on west side of
Turners Crossroad from Circle Down to 200 feet south of Circle Down.
The locations of the proposed widths are shown on Exhibit 2: Proposed Project Layout
and on Exhibit 4: Proposed Street Widths.
Subqrade Corrections
Soil borings taken near the project area indicate pockets of variable soil types;
therefore, a three foot subgrade correction is recommended for Turners Crossroad
South. The subgrade correction would remove soft, moisture susceptible soils that are
structurally unsuitable, and backfill with clean sand and the City's standard bituminous
and gravel street section. Final determination of subgrade correction will occur during
construction based up on soil conditions encountered during excavation.
Concrete Curb and Gutter
A 6-inch barrier curb and an 18-inch gutter(B618 curb and gutter) is proposed for
Turners Crossroad South.
4
Pedestrian Facilities
In order to construct the roadway improvements, the existing sidewalk along the east side of
Turners Crossroad South will be removed and replaced. In addition, the proposed sidewalk
will be extended approximately 115 feet south to tie into the commercial driveway along the
east side of Turners Crossroad South.
Pedestrian ramps and sidewalks will be reconstructed to comply with all applicable
accessibility requirements.
Street Liqhtinq
No street lighting is proposed for the project area.
Tree and Landscape Impacts
The proposed project includes minimizing impacts to landscaping, trees and shrubs as a major
design consideration. As a result, the impacts have been minimized to the extent possible.
Any impacted trees or shrubs will be replaced in accordance with the City's replacement
policy.
Estimated Costs and Proiect Financinq
Estimated Proiect Costs
The estimated costs for the improvements outlined in this report are separated by the type of
work and funding sources. These categories include utility work, storm drainage
improvements, and street reconstruction costs. The estimated project costs include
construction costs and an estimated 30 percent of the construction costs as indirect costs.
These indirect costs typically include project design, surveying, construction administration,
legal costs, and contingency.
Discussion on the financing and funding sources for the proposed improvements is included in
the next section of this report.
Sewer and Water Costs
The estimated sewer and water costs include all water main repairs, sanitary sewer
repairs, and maintenance as outlined within this report.
2012 PMP:
Estimated Sewer and Water Total = $ 400,000
Turners Crossroad South:
Estimated Construction Costs = $ 12,300
Estimated 30% Indirect Costs = 3 700
Estimated Sewer and Water Total = $ 16,000
Amended Estimated Sewer and Water Total = $ 416,000
5
Storm Drainage Costs
The estimated sform drainage costs include all storm sewer installation, water quality
measures, and erosion control.
2012 PMP:
Estimated Storm Drainage Total = $ 650,000
Turners Crossroad South:
Estimated Construction Costs = $ 38,000
Estimated 30% Indirect Costs = $ 12,000
Estimated Storm Drainage Total = $ 50,000
Amended Estimated Storm Drainage Total = $ 700,000
Street Reconstruction Costs
The estimated street reconstruction costs include all subgrade correction, pavement,
curb and gutter, vegetation restoration, and landscaping costs.
2012 PMP:
Estimated Street Reconstruction Total = $ 1,600,000
Turners Crossroad South:
Estimated Construction Costs = $ 273,000
Estimated 30% Indirect Costs = $ 82,000
Estimated Street Reconstruction Total = $ 355,000
Amended Est. Street Reconstruction Total = $ 1,955,000
Total Proiect Costs
2012 PMP:
Estimated Sewer and Water Costs = $ 400,000
Estimated Storm Drainage Costs = $ 650,000
Estimated Street Reconstruction Costs = $ 1,600,000
Estimated Total 2012 PMP Project Cost = $ 2,650,000
Turners Crossroad South:
Estimated Sewer and Water Costs = $ 16,000
Estimated Storm Drainage Costs = $ 50,000
Estimated Street Reconstruction Costs = $ 355,000
Estimated Total Turners Project Cost = $ 421,000
Totai Estimated Amended Project Cost = $ 3,071,000
6
Proposed Proiect Financinq
The proposed financing of this project is a combination of special assessments to properties
abutting the streets being improved, street improvement funds, the Sewer and Water Reserve
Fund, and the Storm Water Improvement Fund. The following is a brief description of each of
these funding sources and a summary of the estimated amount to be funded from each
source.
As discussed earlier in this report, the MCES 1-GV-461 reliever will be constructed within the
Circle Down portion of the 2012 PMP. City staff is currently negotiating the terms of an
agreement with the MCES for cost participation along the force main route. It is anticipated
that the MCES participation in the 2012 PMP will fully cover the estimated $355,000 difference
between the estimated street costs and the budgeted amount in the capital improvement plan.
The MCES cost participation in the 2012 PMP will be based on actual quantities of materials
constructed and the contract prices for these items. Therefore, the actual amount of cost
participation cannot be determined until after construction is completed. Preliminary cost
estimates indicate that the MCES contribution to the 2012 PMP construction may be up to
$1.7 million.
Specia/Assessments
The proposed special assessments for the proposed project are consistent with the City
of Golden Valley Special Assessment Policy and Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. As
outlined in the Special Assessment Policy, commercial properties are assessed on a
front footage basis along Turners Crossroad South.
The commercial special assessment rate for the project has been established by the
City Council in its annual Fee Ordinance. The commercial assessment rate that has
been established for this project is $91.73 per front footage along Turners Crossroad
South.
As shown on Appendix A: Preliminary Special Assessment Roll, the following is a
summary of street reconstruction costs to be financed through special assessments.
2012 PMP = $ 453,454
Turners Crossroad South = $ 102,602
Total Amended Special Assessments = $ 556,056
Sewer and Water Reserve Fund
The Sewer and Water Reserve Fund will be the funding source for all sanitary sewer
and water main work discussed within this report. The estimated amount to be funded
from this source is shown below. The Sewer and Water Reserve Fund is financed from
sanitary sewer and water utility fees.
7
2012 PMP = $ 400,000
Turners Crossroad South = $ 16,000
Total Sewer and Water Reserve Fund = $ 416,000
Storm Sewer Improvement Fund
All storm drainage improvements, including lateral storm sewer extensions, drain tile,
erosion control, and storm water BMPs are funded from the Storm Sewer Improvement
Fund. The estimated amount to be funded from this source is shown below. The Storm
Sewer Improvement Fund is financed from storm water utility fees paid by all properties
in the City.
2012 PMP = $ 650,000
Turners Crossroad South = $ 50,000
Total Storm Sewer Improvement Fund =$ 700,000
Street Improvement Funds
All street rehabilitation costs not funded by special assessments will be funded using
street improvement tax levies. These levies are used to repay bonds sold to finance the
project. The estimated amount to be funded from this source is shown below.
2012 PMP = $ 1,146,546
Turners Crossroad South = $ 252,398
Total Street Improvement Fund = $ 1,398,944
Financinq Summarv
The following is a summary of the amounts to be funded from each of the sources
discussed above.
2012 PMP Turners Amended
Sewer and Water Reserve Fund = $ 400,000 $ 16,000 $ 416,000
Storm Sewer Improvement Fund = $ 650,000 $ 50,000 $ 700,000
Street Improvement Funds = $ 1,600,000 $ 355.000 $ 1.955,000
Estimated Total Project Cost= $ 2,650,000 $ 421,000 $ 3,071,000
Summarv and Recommendations
At its June 21, 2011 meeting, the Golden Valley City Council authorized amending the 2011
and 2012 PMP feasibility report to include Turners Crossroad South. This report discusses the
proposed improvements to the commercial roadway, which begin at the south end of Turners
Crossroad South at Interstate 394 and extend north to the intersection with Circle Down. The
location of these proposed improvements are shown on Exhibit 1: Project Location Map.
8
The proposed improvements are part of a city-wide Pavement Management Program adopted
by the City in order to provide a high-quality street system in a long-term, cost-effective
manner. The Pavement Management Program also includes the replacement and
rehabilitation of the existing sanitary sewer, water main, and storm sewer systems as needed.
A summary of the proposed improvements is as follows:
Utilitv Improvements
The sanitary sewer work proposed for the project area includes lining of defective
sections of sewer main, replacement of all sanitary sewer manhole castings and covers,
and the reconstruction of deteriorating sanitary sewer manholes.
Proposed water main improvements for the project include hydrant sandblasting and
painting, as well as adjustments to gate valves and gate valve manholes.
The estimated cost for the proposed sanitary sewer and water main work discussed
within this report is $16,000. The estimated totals include construction and indirect
costs. This portion of the project will be funded from the Sewer and Water Reserve
Fund.
Storm Drainaqe Improvements
The proposed storm sewer improvements for the project area include replacing catch
basins and storm sewer leads, replacing all castings, and reconstructing deteriorating
manholes.
The estimated cost for the proposed storm drainage improvements discussed within this
report is $50,000. The estimated totals include construction and indirect costs. All
storm water related costs within this project are to be funded from the Storm Sewer
Improvement Fund.
Street/mprovements
The street improvements proposed as part of this project include rehabilitation of
approximately 550 feet of Turners Crossroad South.
The proposed street reconstruction within the project area has been designed according
to City standards including the installation of concrete curb and gutter and asphalt
pavement. The proposed street widths have been minimized to the extent possible to
avoid and minimize impacts to trees and landscaping.
The improvements to all streets within this project are shown on Exhibit 2:Proposed
Project Layout.
The estimated cost for the street reconstruction discussed within this report is $355,000.
The estimated totals include construction and indirect costs. All street rehabilitation
9
costs not funded by special assessments will be funded using street improvement tax
levies.
Recommendations
Public Works staff has determined that the improvements outlined in this report are feasible
from an engineering perspective. These improvements are consistent with the City of Golden
Valley Pavement Management Program and will benefit the community and those properties
abutting the proposed improvements. The cost-effectiveness of the proposed improvements
should be determined by the City Council.
Staff recommends approval of the addition of Turners Crossroad South to City Improvement
Project No. 12-1, as discussed within this report. Staff further recommends that the City
Council authorize advertising for bids to construct Turners Crossroad South as part of the 2012
Pavement Management Project as approved at the November 16, 2010 public hearing.
10
_ _ _._
m � � �
.
� � s �� �
hr pG , ,
0
��� o ° I II i
0 0 � $ �-- g� ��
H �' h � t
� �
�
9 y� �r
h
os �
h
`'�''a h C h � e � �r
h'n � �is'
'��'i �O �r
�Q �r �
� "' '�n Q"o F ,� �vs i2s �
� � �
� o � �y` � � o/zs //zs } � fn
�
�, �, h � �s oaas iazr y � Z �
� � Q
� ry \ W /8aS °, � 'fl pePZ l6ZS � Q �
u �[, 9 " �
� q� $ 0 �, '[' V7 O `� 9 00 lQfS h �i
� ♦ � � W ry `V �' � �
U
� �` O!C J �
♦ 'o V
� �, � � a � °� o � , ° U U
$ ey "� � . . � � � � . � ; wm
• , � � -' w
i � ` h � $ `' � Z
is � o , � 8 , � � �
is � h h �
� y � � � $ � 9 g 9 � � � h � � � e' �
e�ior �� oar ooc ois ooi Otl0l�SOkYJ s
i svi�
� � �
h�
, 0
h y
's�
� �� NY,I�
h k
so-io.�s � or-r�i c�V oSC'-X � �
� � J Q
J�
si-arts �! I ' I p I >�
5
�,��� � � I p z
co J�
i 1
� I
0
< � y y ry h
O
h VR
� � ; � � � �
h � � H a
sra.v ,,�,�
�O W � � �
9 � � '�' � h � , o
e � g � �
� a � , � 0 °� � °�" � <
�v � �
� ; : : $ �' h " � "� � g � Q
h ,�, 3 v
� � � � � � � " 8 � � � _ :'S
. N3a�OJ �
d � � � w � w w � � � � s �%pavao � �-� a�
� o��
� � p � p y� �i �� � �a 9 h g
Po a�
Q769 �
IZ69
�
� � h h h
� Of69
� �
� p � � Si69 � Q
OlI9 � /�
� SSi9 y
� � �� �
� � � 6�� r�>9 W J "ee
H :a°
p � �6i9 �� � J U „'"
Of:9 O W o<
� SlS9 � g�
XCO , F �,��
--{ d °s' y,5 ` es.v p � .,�
-- --i �'� o.v� 65 �0 �'.vs.v N � �\W
� I �!, S6S9 ApS9 ' �
$ � i �, !99 �
5999 Af'99 � �
�L� S6D g �S9S �
� �
�Jit�i{� '` �-__ - 11�-� �I -i,iF:11�.1.1�'-'=I...�.. _.atfi\� �..��J�e�..-�Ji-t\.-Tt ..I-, ��f�_\'_
This Page Left Blank Intentionally
8 �p� t ¢ �� N
���� <�� ° �
�����g � a�
Wu„ F
� Q - -NY �� �" �� g� ��
�_�f�-_� � W wa w$=��g o� $°� � O
� y ' p! � - -
s �
� ; � �
gN
� °
Up
w
� O
¢
wU
� �
Ow
O �
� �
i
� I � '
8 � ' " w
� � ��
w � � QO
� � °� 2 > cn
I— Z z
U I � i' �� Q� ��
;
- � ,� � . � � c�
_ _ �� -,k: '�---• . _ _ � '� `-- o
� �-� � ., I ,,s,� , Q
- � -�; _--- �. — --- °
t,
{_ � �
, �
I � H1f10S a'dOdSSOki�Ski�NdfLL O�
i
� ¢ U
� o
J � �
J �
Z a.i
IQ I � �
� ~ �
�ff
�$a
e�;
�s�
��a
\
� W
N
_e,�vs�.r = ��-i i - � :, � �;�„�_�ti�,i c.._..,�,_z�,�,�.»��� �-__ � .� ,
_'-- - __,— - i i�...4�_,�.��.;�_�..
This Page Left Blank Intentionally
0 \ \
� s � �
8 �� `�` '
� ��h ��� ! �
�, h $ j--� ,i!, �
" " � , , �� ��
I , � o�,
a
�s
� y ` � y � � �r �°.
1".� y y , «rr
y�'o �O �r
�i. "i O �r �
o �, h � � �0 �s ��'s � z�
�" y b � o.a�s «zr Y r (�J�
a
°' t:, °h � If�s arzs .aas � � � �
h � �i izas o b y Q
g ry � w '° q 9 a.ras �sas � W �
h �� 4 � � � 1�l p `° y oo iacs h �
$ R � � � °� � ` O
� � ores u) ¢
♦ � ,, e (� U
�°`, eh w ° � � $ � $ $ � � , o
Z
e cn
, g � ,, g o h m w
.s tu P � � R � 8 . � O� \ $ W ¢
es g� y h �
kYll � h � ' � � � �, 9 S ^�'i � � $ `° � � � �
d o S�13NF1f11 y
ovr ooz ooe oie aoi Otl02�^SOkYJ
�-svi I
�4� � "
y �
S
h
� ��bM.
h "yY
ro�o.�s . & as-c�9e ei�v o��X � r
W
J �
.tr��ts I �i 2 W I
> ��� � � (� �
o �
< \ h y � h
�
0
h R
� s � � � � y
v h ,, � � �
Sl09 p � � �
p � � � -J
� e � � � �' �, � - N o
� J
� /l� `� � � � � � w � Q
h h h 'n h h N
° � � °� /r h h h h g ; �'
SN � � e a �.
h e 3 �
� � °`v $ � � � ro � � a $ N3Ulo'J - �
�°' � � � � � � � $ � � "$ S 3A �
go�� aa-ooa � �
O/d9
� \ O \ � � q� � pq �a � s `
bj
CNd9 A
�PX'3
E �
y � ; 'n h
�. OJ'C9 � �
�
0 p $ � 5669 � � �
O/I9 �
b SSI9 e
S �y
� � � 6�� ser9 � �9 � $�o
q�gy�st m ab�
SOS9 � tl � �'609 �lll�al Q <� � �_
�f�.�
� \ h s/S9 > > ,.
.tc,v �O � �� � g^a
___j � ,I ac 65�,5 � �cs.v po �_
-T-��I--i ' os� F�.vss N � � ' \\W
i i sesv ass.v y�
� r � �Y99 �
� I i oe �
5999 Od'9 ry� � �
� � OL.4,t S69 y 'SS99 �
J���•A= 'I'IY It f'_:_ I i_" ,i:l -_,.F., F.. -'_ - _ _' - .�� � _�_i,iJ�y.�J�-h� 1�_�I �,�I��''_ '_\=
This Page Left Blank Intentionally
' � o , , I' I
a i O
f �
� s I IIiII. Z
g �y.c I , �
o f-- �'.li I/i � F
g, o h � g I",:I�II �� Q�
a �
h
��s ��
� � 'n h y %
h � h h � b �s
ti y � ��s
� � y � � �r � �
� h � � � �2s /2�s � �
o � y c. O
� y�-j � b 0/2t lldS Q (J�
�� � `�' ry �9 azzs �azs �°�y � c$` �
y \ � lZZS � � 9 � !.. O
g n� �. "' � 06'dS lCZS W �
h p g
h � � � � W � � � �1 � b 9 00 /OSS y � O
� n�, ores � Q
� `° " U
� � h � °' � � � � � � � � W
h eh �, o o � � �o . �
� � 0 O o�C
, . ow . d w
o : � � `' O z
.s tu °� � . � v �, $ � � � a �
is � h h F
S
` � e
y h ` � � �v �i °�i °\i 9 � � $ �° � � � �
J'/O/ �y�� S
pp� ORZ OOC Q/S OOi �v�p�J!'��`
L-SO/p
y � �
h,0a
�
y y
's�
h ^�bb,� y
so iais �- . � � os-a�i e�V a3��X y W
� J Hi
s.-s�iss � � O
h �
W Z
'�byH�,� � ° o�
1 0
� � I c�
0
; " h �
h
� , � � ,, �u �
h , �°�, � <
sro9 $ � � �
W e
� ♦ � � h W
� � z , , � g � o
N �t8r � , , . � e w � --�
gN ; : � "� � h `' `' `' � � e a
�
w � 3 �
� ' ` � $ � �v $ � °09 �y y °�, N3QlO�J - �
� ti �
r�' v � w � � ry `' `' `' a�
�, � y �, S 3Ago�d� oa-ooa �
006 O/d9 �
d
" � � $ � °� � ,°� � �4 � � g
��� �
IZ69
v
� � ; h `n
� OfS9 T
�
� � � � SIO9 � �
Oli9 �
� SSi9
e � � g�� Ksiis ��o
� S6I9 m � � � +��
SOS9 � V a�L�—� Q n-
� SlS9 N b
d£9 \ , F � e7 �i $�i
_--a � i oe fi5�5 ` �css g � ' ' ,S
- -- --� � o.v� �0 �'.vse N �\W
I � SBS9 OBS9 N
�� f _I �i OC.� l99 Q �
S.D99 OC99 � �
OL� S69 g �599 <
� �
-� '4= 't�l` J,�':J��_ t . '/- -^F=ylFJr �.i�V�� ' .. -�i . ._�_�:.,�,d`..�fi-��.. � �,-._ _.I.\'
This Page Left Blank Intentionally
a
j J Vj � N m r � ,
� I Q I- h N I� cM � .
� � � y V � O O � �
I F- N N V oD N .
i ( Q H3 � � � � � �
i �
i � V N � I
0 � � N � � � I
�i W S� � N � M O li
J � fq V � O O � I
I� I Ja � � � � r I
� � II
i
� o
w y�
I � �- o 0 0 0 0
W � o 0 0 0 0
LL m o 0 0 0 0
Wvi » » f» F» �
o a
I I �
I W Z O O O O
I � 7
I,
I
1
I
I y M V N
' 0 N
iZ N N
�
W
I C7 N � c0 V
a � V
i � M � N (MO
i � �
I LL
I
�
I
I J IJ
} IIW
� I
� J
W = a V
2 F w � c
O w J W � I��
� � a � � rn
F p > p � I�o
w � w m o ;o
O � � W a c
a a l�'J � z � v N
I oor� �a �
OM f� � ��
!O
t°� O� V`�1 � Z
ne»� }o _g
� cfl �c m co i U a�
F � v�i u�i � i a m a�
� I � �n � � n'� > m
O Z Z Z Z o':i c >
o;� �
� � � � � � � �
a
a N a��i v m a��i Z'i o U'�o
� I � � m m m `;�oC�
y � c c c c ��'�;� y*�
� � a � � i o �
� o 0 0 0 �'�� � °�
U Z!y oo m
U C7 C7 U' U'
� a�i,w m>
� >,p m c
W Q�- �
� p �;��o
Fi� � F'I N �n o x
F N � 0 M�I N O W
p � � Z � � � ��� eo r �°
�
c � cu'7 °o N a a a j>.�' �' �
G� � � II Q �y w w ¢ ¢ �''i'C �a d
� a � F � W 4.' U � > } Q'inQQ �
y ~ � � � v~i v H � � c'i d c c �,
y � W ZZV~i � O'� 00 F
a wcW70� � pQ w � o ° °o �I,°� rr �
J a a fn LL C� � V N V � N I E N N x
� a Z � ��O 7 l� � � � �''�..� O O �
41 � � Z w Q J I = dlV d d �
W �-
Q (n W Z � a Z� - __ I� N M ^ .._ I V
x �� W � J � ? O O O Q ii o
� �� � Q � Z O O O � I �
� .0 �� d Z W ON � R V V ti .-IN M R °�
d � Oa � p � � a rn rn o`�i ^ I� c7o
Q�� � N � �J = O O O � N �i � �o
Q d U N U a' �O O O O d' Z �I � LL >
N K
This Page Left Blank Intentionally
Resolution 11-72 December 13, 2011
Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION ORDERING CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN PROPOSED
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND AUTHORIZING ADVERTISING FOR BIDS
PROJECT NO. 12-01
2012 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
AS AMENDED BY THE ADDITION OF TURNERS CROSSROAD
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Golden Valley, Minnesota, as follows:
1. That a public hearing held on this day at 7:00 pm, at the address of 7800 Golden
Valley Road in the City of Golden Valley, Minnesota, after notice of said hearing duly
published as required by law, this Council has consulted the view of all persons
interested, and, being fully advised of the pertinent facts, does hereby determine to
proceed with the construction of certain proposed public improvements for the said
City, in accordance with the description of said improvements contained in said
notice.
2. It is hereby found and determined that Public Improvements Project 12-01 is
feasible and can best be constructed as set forth in said report and not in
connection with some other improvements. (The Council reserves the right fo
consolidate said improvements with other public improvements if it seems advisable
to do so.) It is further found that the improvements are effective and necessary.
3. The cost of said improvements shall be paid in part out of special assessment to be
levied as set forth in said notice of public hearing.
4. The City Engineer is hereby designated as engineer for the proposed public
improvements, and is hereby authorized, ordered and instructed to prepare final
plans and specifications for said improvements and obtain proposals for the same in
accordance with said report except as modified at the Public Hearing.
5. That the City Clerk shall prepare an Advertisement for Bids for making such
improvements. The advertisement shall be published as required by statute, shall
specify work to be done and shall state the time and place that the bids shall be
opened and considered by the City Engineer and City Clerk, and that no bids will be
considered unless sealed and filed with the Clerk.
Linda R. Loomis, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan M. Virnig, City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member
and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor
and her signature attested by the City Clerk.
Resolution 89-66 �avember 21, 7989
Member Sakken introduced the fal7owing reso7ution and moved i�s adoption:
RESOLUTION RESTRiCTIN6 PARKING ON TURNERS CROSSROAD
NNEREAS, the City Council has the pvwer and authority, pursuant to Chapter
9.06, subd. Z of the City Code, to designate no parking zones and areas, and it
appears that no parking zones shovld be created an certain portioas of Furners
Crassroad;
NOt�, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLYE�, by the City Counc9l far the City of Golden
Yalley that na parkfng shall be permitted anytime on both sides of Turners
Crossroad,. from T.H. I2 to Glen;�ood Avenue.
, `C� ;,� c��
ary �. n rson, ayor
ATTE5T:
y a y, eputy C. ty er
e rrrot9on for the adopt�on of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member
Thompson and upon a vote being taken thereon, the fo7lowing voted �in favor
thereof: Anderson, Bakken, Stackman and Thampson; and the foTlowing was
absent: Jahnson, and the following voted against the sarr�: none, whereuport
said resolutian was declared d�1y passed and adopted, signed by the Mayar and
her sfgnature attested by the Deputy City C1erk.
;
Resolution 11-73 December 13, 2011
Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION RESCINDING PORTIONS OF RESOLUTION 89-66
. TO MODIFY PARKING RESTRICTIONS ON TURNERS CROSSROAD
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Golden Valley, Minnesota, as
follows:
WHEREAS, the City Council has the power and authority, pursuant to Chapter 9.06,
subd. 2 of the City Code, to designate no parking zones and areas, and it appears that
parking should be permitted on certain portions of Turners Crossroad; and
WHEREAS, on November 21, 1989, the City Council adopted Resolution 89-66,
restricting parking on Turners Crossroad; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a portion of Resolution 89-66
restricting parking on Turners Crossroad is hereby rescinded to permit parking on a portion
of Turners Crossroad as follows:
Parking shall be permitted on the west side of Turners Crossroad from the centerline
of Circle Down to a point 200 feet south of Circle Down.
Linda R. Loomis, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan M. Virnig, City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member
and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor
and her signature attested by the City Clerk.
C�t ?:u
c�,� : � "i�'x�i��ji��,�
i!i� Finance
0 1� V 763-593-8013 I 763-593-8109 (fax)
Executive Summary For Action
Golden Valley Special City Council Meeting
December 13, 2011
Agenda Item
2. B. Public Hearing - Special Assessments - 2012 Pavement Management Program
Prepared By
Sue Virnig, Finance Director
Summary
The following resolution needs to be approved for the certification of special assessments for
the 2012 Pavement Management Program area. All property owners were sent the notice of
hearing and assessment for consideration.
Attachments
Project Address List (2 pages)
Resolution Adopting and Confirming Assessments for Various Public Improvements in the
2012 Pavement Management Area (2 pages)
Recommended Action
Motion to adopt Resolution Adopting and Confirming Assessments for Various Public
Improvements in the 2012 Pavement Management Area.
Pending Special Assessment Roll
CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY
2012 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
CITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Deferred Levied Total
PID Adress Assessments Assessment Assessment
3002924240015 5001 CIRCLE DOWN 5,750.00 5,750.00
3002924240019 5010 CIRCLE DOWN 11,500.00 5,750.00 17,250.00
3002924240014 5011 CIRCIE DOWN 5,750.00 5,750.00
3002924230046 5020 CIRCLE DOWN 5,750.00 5,750.00
3002924230045 5100 CIRCLE DOWN 5,750.00 5,750.00
3002924230056 5101 CIRCLE DOWN 5,750.00 5,750.00
3002924230055 5111 CIRCLE DOWN 5,750.00 5,750.00
3002924230044 5120 CIRCLE DOWN 5,750.00 5,750.00
3002924230054 5121 CIRCLE DOWN 5,750.00 5,750.00
3002924230043 5200 CIRCLE DOWN 5,750.00 5,750.00
3002924230053 5201 CIRCLE DOWN 5,750.00 5,750.00
3002924230042 5210 CIRCLE DOWN 5,750.00 5,750.00
3002924230052 5211 CIRCLE DOWN 5,750.00 5,750.00
3002924230041 5220 CIRCLE DOWN 5,750.00 5,750.00
3002924230051 5221 CIRCLE DOWN 5,750.00 5,750.00
3002924230040 5230 CIRCLE DOWN 5,750.00 5,750.00
3002924230049 5231 CIRCLE DOWN 5,750.00 5,750.00
3002924230039 5300 CIRCLE DOWN 5,750.00 5,750.00
3002924230048 5301 CIRCLE DOWN 5,750.00 5,750.00
3002924230057 5307-5311 CIRCLE DOWN 12,219.45 12,219.45
3002924230038 5310 CIRCLE DOWN 5,750.00 5,750.00
3002924230037 5320 CIRCLE DOWN 5,750.00 5,750.00
3002924230036 5400 CIRCLE DOWN 5,750.00 5,750.00
3002924230035 5410 CIRCLE DOWN 5,750.00 5,750.00
3002924230047 5411 CIRCLE DOWN 39,331.07 39,331.07
3002924230034 5420 CIRCLE DOWN 2,875.00 2,875.00
0411721220176 6001 GLENWOOD AVE 5,750.00 5,750.00
2811821340045 5615 GOLDEN VALLEY RD 2,875.00 2,875.00
0411721220056 110 KING CREEK RD 5,750.00 5,750.00
0411721210029 115 KING CREEK RD 5,750.00 5,750.00
0411721220057 130 KING CREEK RD 5,750.00 5,750.00
0411721210032 135 KING CREEK RD 5,750.00 5,750.00
0411721220058 150 KING CREEK RD 5,750.00 5,750.00
0411721210031 155 KING CREEK RD 5,750.00 5,750.00
0411721220059 210 KING CREEK RD 5,750.00 5,750.00
0411721210026 215 KING CREEK RD 5,750.00 5,750.00 11,500.00
0411721220060 230 KING CREEK RD 5,750.00 5,750.00
0411721220055 235 KING CREEK RD 5,750.00 5,750.00 11,500.00
0411721220061 250 KING CREEK RD 5,750.00 5,750.00
Deferred Levied Total
PID Adress Assessments Assessment Assessment
0411721220174 111 KING HILL RD 5,750.00 5,750.00
0411721220178 120 KING HILL RD 5,750.00 5,750.00
0411721220175 131 KING HILL RD 5,750.00 5,750.00
0411721220179 140 KING HILL RD 5,750.00 5,750.00
0411721220177 151 KING HILL RD 5,750.00 5,750.00
0411721220180 160 KING HILL RD 5,750.00 5,750.00
0411721220181 180 KING HILL RD 5,750.00 5,750.00
0411721220053 200 KING HILL RD 5,750.00 5,750.00
0411721220062 205 KING HILL RD 5,750.00 5,750.00
0411721220052 220 KING HILL RD 5,750.00 5,750.00
0411721220051 240 KING HILL RD 5,750.00 5,750.00
0411721220050 260 KING HILL RD 5,750.00 5,750.00
0411721220054 280 KING HILL RD 5,750.00 5,750.00
3311821210015 5505 PHOENIX ST 2,875.00 2,875.00
3311821210008 5510 PHOENIX ST 5,750.00 2,875.00 8,625.00
3311821210017 5525 PHOENIX ST 5,750.00 5,750.00
3311821210007 5600 PHOENIX ST 5,750.00 5,750.00
3311821210018 5605 PHOENIX S7 5,750.00 5,750.00
3311821210025 5620 PHOENIX ST 2,875.00 2,875.00
3311821210006 1102 WELCOME AVE N 5,750.00 5,750.00
3311821210024 1107 WELCOME AVE N 5,750.00 5,750.00
3311821210023 1119 WELCOME AVE N 5,750.00 5,750.00
3311821210005 1120 WELCOME AVE N 5,750.00 5,750.00
3311821210004 1200 WELCOME AVE N 5,750.00 5,750.00
3311821210003 1220 WELCOME AVE N 5,750.00 5,750.00
2811821340050 1240 WELCOME AVE N 5,750.00 5,750.00
2811821340055 1255 WELCOME AVE N 5,750.00 5,750.00
2811821340049 1300 WELCOME AVE N 5,750.00 5,750.00
2811821340054 1305 WELCOME AVE N 5,750.00 5,750.00
2811821340048 1310 WELCOME AVE N 5,750.00 5,750.00
2811821340053 1315 WELCOME AVE N 5,750.00 5,750.00
2811821340047 1316 WELCOME AVE N 5,750.00 5,750.00
2811821340046 1324 WELCOME AVE N 5,750.00 5,750.00
2811821340051 1325 WELCOME AVE N 2,875.00 2,875.00
3311821210061 1135 WELCOME CIR 2,875.00 2,875.00
3311821210022 1136 WELCOME CIR 2,875.00 2,875.00
3002924230047 5411 CIRCLE DOWN 12,467.94 12,467.94
3002924230002 1201 TURNERS CROSSROAD 8,072.24 8,072.24
3002924230063 5410 WAYZATA BLVD 24,047.94 24,047.94
0411721240027 5500 WAYZATA BLVD 58,013J2 58,013.72
Total 28,750.00 550,902.36 579,652.36
Resolution 11-74 December 13, 2011
Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION ADOPTING AND CONFIRMING ASSESSMENTS FOR
VARIOUS PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR STREETS IN THE
2012 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT AREA
1. The amount proper and necessary to be specially assessed at this time for
various public improvements:
Pro'ect Years Interest Rate First Year Lev Total Assessed
2012 Pavement 10 6% 2013 $550,902.36
Management Area
Deferred Assessments $28,750
against every assessable lot, piece, or parcel of land affected thereby has been duly
calculated upon the basis of benefits, without regard to cash valuation, in accordance with
the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and notice has been duly published, as
required by law that this Council would meet to hear, consider and pass upon all objections,
if any, and said proposed assessment has at all time since its filing been open for public
inspection and an opportunity has been given to all interested persons to present their
objections if any, to such proposed assessments.
2. This Council, having heard and considered all objections so presented, finds that
each of the lots, pieces and parcels of land enumerated in the proposed assessment was
and is specially benefited by the construction of said improvement in not less than the
amount of the assessment set opposite the description of each such lot, piece and parcel
of land respectively, and such amount so set out is hereby levied against each of the
respective lots, pieces and parcels of land therein described.
3. The proposed assessments are hereby adopted and confirmed as the proper
assessments for each of said lots, pieces and parcels of land respectively, and the
assessment against each parcel, together with interest at the rate of six (6) percent per
annum accruing on the full amount thereof unpaid, shall be a lien concurrent with general
taxes upon parcel and all thereof. The total amount of each such assessment not prepaid
shall be payable in equal annual principal installments extending over a period of years, as
indicated in each case. The first of said installments, together with interest on the entire
assessment for the period of January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2013, will be payable
with general taxes for the year of 2012, collectible in 2013, and one of each of the
remaining installments, together with one year's interest on that and all other unpaid
installments, will be paid with general taxes for each consecutive year thereafter until the
entire assessment is paid.
Resolution 11-74 - Continued December 13, 2011
4. Prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, the owner of any
lot, piece or parcel of land assessed hereby may at any time pay the whole such
assessment, with interest to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer, but no interest
shall be charged if such payment is made by November 18, 2012.
5. The City Clerk shall, as soon as may be, prepare and transmit to the County
Auditor a certified duplicate of the assessment roll, with each installment and interest on
each unpaid assessment set forth separately, to be extended upon the proper tax lists of
the County and the County Auditor shall thereafter collect said assessment in the manner
provided by law.
Linda R. Loomis, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan M. Virnig, City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member
and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor
and her signature attested by the City Clerk.
� � s---=°� {n ��°
���y �����r�6N IG���i�
� 0 a
=r.��� � e Public Works
��aY 763-593-8030/763-593-3988 (fax)
Executive Summary For Action
Golden Valley Special City Council Meeting
December 13, 2011
Agenda Item
2. C. Public Hearing for Project No. 12-02, Reconstruction of Harold Avenue and
Rhode Island Avenue North
Prepared By
Jeannine Clancy, Director of Public Works
Jeff Oliver, PE, City Engineer
Summary
At its December 7, 2010 meeting, the City Council directed staff to prepare a feasibility report
for the reconstruction of Harold Avenue between Glenwood Avenue and Winnetka Avenue,
and Rhode Island Avenue North between Harold Avenue and Trunk Highway 55 as shown on
the attached location map. Harold Avenue is a Municipal State Aid (MSA) street that is 0.52
miles in length, and Rhode Island Avenue is a local street that is 0.06 miles long.
The feasibility report for this project has been prepared by the consulting engineering firm of
Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. and will be presented at the public hearing. The feasibility
report outlines a project that includes reconstruction of the subject streets, repairs portions of
the sanitary sewer and water systems, and includes storm drainage improvements
throughout the project area.
As a MSA street, the reconstruction of Harold Avenue is eligible for MSA funding from the
Minnesota Department of Transportation, which is financed statewide through gas tax
revenues. In order to qualify for MSA funding, certain design criteria must be complied with.
The width of the roadway and the availability of on-street parking are among the design
criteria established for MSA funding. In order to best meet the needs of adjacent property
owners while minimizing impacts along the Harold Avenue corridor, the proposed project
includes reconstruction of Harold Avenue as a 28-foot wide roadway with no parking
permitted on either side of the street, with the exception the south side of Harold Avenue
immediately adjacent to Lions Park. The street is proposed to be constructed at a 34-foot
width in this area, with parking permitted on the south side of the street along the park
frontage. Resolutions restricting parking on Harold Avenue are included with the project
approval.
Staff is currently working with a property owner adjacent to the Harold Avenue corridor on
Glenwood Avenue to investigate the potential construction of water quality ponding. Costs
are included in the feasibility report for this ponding. If an agreement can be reached with the
property owner, the land acquisition information and pond construction information will be
forwarded to the City Council for its consideration.
The total estimated cost for the proposed reconstruction of Harold Avenue, Rhode Island
Avenue and the Glenwood Avenue ponds is as follows:
Estimated Harold Avenue Project Cost = $1,989,000
Estimated Rhode Island Avenue Project Cost = $ 233,100
Estimated Glenwood Pond Cost = $ 215,300
The estimated project costs include all construction costs for street reconstruction, storm
sewer modifications, and sanitary sewer and watermain work. An estimated 30% of the
construction costs have been included for indirect costs, which include project design,
staking, construction observation, administration and legal expenses.
The special assessment for the proposed project is consistent with the Special Assessment
Policy and Fee Ordinance for local and Municipal State Aid Streets. The special assessment
rates for the proposed project are outlined within the feasibility report.
If approved by the City Council, it is anticipated that the reconstruction of Harold Avenue and
Rhode Island Avenue will be combined with the 2012 Pavement Management project for
construction under a single contract. The anticipated schedule for the project is as follows:
Open Bids February/March 2012
Begin Construction Spring 2012
Complete Construction Fall 2012
Attachments
Project Location Map (1 page)
Feasibility Report for Harold Avenue Reconstruction (46 pages)
Resolution Ordering Construction of Certain Proposed Public Improvements and Authorizing
Advertising for Bids for City Project No. 12-02, Reconstruction of Harold Avenue and Rhode
Island Avenue North (1 page)
Resolution Restricting Parking on Harold Avenue between Winnetka Avenue North and
Glenwood Avenue (1 page)
Recommended Action
1. Conduct the Public Hearing for City Improvement Project 12-02, Harold Avenue and
Rhode Island Avenue North.
2. Motion to adopt Resolution Ordering Construction of Certain Proposed Public
Improvements and Authorizing Advertising for Bids for City Improvement Project
No. 12-02, Reconstruction of Harold Avenue and Rhode Island Avenue North.
3. Motion to adopt Resolution Restricting Parking on Harold Avenue befinreen Winnetka
Avenue North and Glenwood Avenue.
Z
�� �
� /� Q
to
� Hennepm '�
� County >
`' Library =
c
a
Calvary
z Lutheran
°' Church
>
a Government d
Y Center& va\�ey R
� Fire Station#1 �,o�ae'�
__
� �
�l�v�
Country Club Dr
U.S.
Post Office �' c�ehwooaq��
�
z �c
y J
.. a �, �•t
v � W ��e�
sta fe Hw � ,, �Gro
os — F � d
�•�S;`� � � �- � � ��� � Olson Memorial HwY
�:.. Q
� � ,.,
�
,�,�.:.�„��: �
� °�"."�` �z
a' °
� '` � Spirit of
N Hope �
�Ca �,��p v,y N o Church Harold Ave
� � ��,.
z
a�
a'
� �, �(
Y � Q
N
C �
� o Lions
� Park
Brookview � Z
Park = �
z a'
Western Avenue � �
y Y
Marsh Q "
,,.,,,
� � �
� R d
� •� Y
m
3 i ��
a°' a -°�
es : ve � � �n
Q � � d
� t� a
�� ¢ �
E�'alq Ter �' � � �`
� � �
N p
Location Map P�ntDate 10/25/11
Source:
,.j y�� � City of Golden Valley for all GIS layers. e
`� � ��� Harold Avenue
Not to Scale
. 11!
I��
a �r� a �
Feasibility Report
Harold Avenue Reconst�uction
City of Golden Valley, Minnesota
City Project No. 12-02
SEH No. GOLDV 115792
September 26, 2011
This Page Left Blank Intentionally
Harold Avenue Reconstruction
Feasibility Report
City of Golden Valley, Minnesota
City Project No.12-02
SEH No. GOLDV 115792
September 26, 2011
I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision,
and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of
Minnesota.
,L����C,�i%�:�-.��
Daniel P. Erickson,PE
Date: September 26,2011 Lic.No.: 46661
Reviewed by: ���^'��
Date
Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc.
3535 Vadnais Center Drive
Saint Paul, MN 55110-5196
651.490.2000
This Page Left Blank Intentionally
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Introduction...............................................................................................................................1
ProjectLegal Description.........................................................................................................1
ExistingConditions..................................................................................................................2
SanitarySewer............................................................................................................................2
Inflowand Infiltration.............................................................................................................2
SewerMains............................................................................................................................2
SanitarySewer Services..........................................................................................................2
WaterMain................................................................................................................................. 3
StormWater Drainage...................................:............................................................................ 3
Streets.......................................................................................................................................... 3
StreetWidths...........................................................................................................................3
PavementSections ..................................................................................................................4
SubgradeConditions...............................................................................................................4
Environmental Concerns ........................................................................................................4
Concrete Curb and Gutter...................................................................................................... 5
PedestrianFacilities............................................................................................................... 5
StreetLighting ........................................................................................................................ 5
ProposedImprovements..........................................................................................................5
PublicParticipation................................................................................................................ 5
Sanitary Sewer and Water Main.................................................................................................6
Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation................................................................................................ 6
Sanitary Sewer Service Rehabilitation.................................................................................... 6
Water Main Rehabilitation ..................................................................................................... 7
StormWater Management.......................................................................................................... 7
WaterQuality Measures......................................................................................................... 8
Streets.......................................................................................................................................... 9
StreetWidths........................................................................................................................... 9
SubgradeCorrections........................................................................................................... 10
ConcreteCurb and Gutter.................................................................................................... 11
IntersectionReview .................................................................................................................. 11
PedestrianFacilities.................................................................................................................. 11
StreetLighting.......................................................................................................................... 11
Tree and Landscape Impacts..................................................................................................... 11
Driveway Reconstruction Program........................................................................................... 12
Estimated Costs and Project Financing................................................................................13
EstimatedProject Costs............................................................................................................ 13
Sewerand Water Costs......................................................................................................... 13
StormDrainage Costs........................................................................................................... 13
StreetReconstruction Costs.................................................................................................. 14
TotalPYOject Costs ............................................................................................................... 14
Proposed Project Financing...................................................................................................... 15
i
StateAid(MSA)Funds.......................................................................................................... 15
SpecialAssessments.............................................................................................................. 15
Sewer and Water Reserve Fund............................................................................................ 16
Storm Sewer Improvement Fund........................................................................................... 16
StreetImprovement Funds.................................................................................................... 16
FinancingSummary.............................................................................................................. 17
Summary and Recommendations..........................................................................................17
UtilityImprovements............................................................................................................. 18
Storm Drainage Improvements............................................................................................. 18
StreetImprovements.............................................................................................................. 19
Recommendations..................................................................................................................19
Exhibit 1 Location Map
Exhibit 2 Proposed Project Layout
Exhibit 3 Existing Street Widths
Exhibit 4 Proposed Street Widths
Exhibit 5 Subcut Depths/Soil Borings
Appendix A— Resolution Authorizing Feasibility Report
Appendix B - Summary of Residential Comments
Appendix C - Tree and Shrub Impacts
Appendix D — Preliminary Special Assessment Roll
I1
Introduction
At its December 7, 2010 meeting, the Golden Valley City Council authorized preparation
of a feasibility report for the rehabilitation of Harold Avenue including Rhode Island
Avenue North. The proposed project includes rehabilitation of streets as follows:
Harold Avenue = 0.52 miles Municipal State Aid (MSA)
Rhode Island Avenue = 0.06 miles Local Street
Harold Avenue is located south of Trunk Highway 55 (TH 55) between Winnetka
Avenue North and Glenwood Avenue. Rhode Island Avenue North is located between
Trunk Highway 55 (TH 55)and Harold Avenue. Harold Avenue is designated as a
Municipal State Aid (MSA) local collector in the City's comprehensive plan and carries
approximately 1050 vehicles per day. The surrounding land use is predominantly a
combination of single family residential and multiple dwelling residential, multiple
dwelling residential, and park and open space uses.
This feasibility report will discuss the existing conditions of the streets, sanitary sewer,
water mains, and storm sewer within the project area. In addition, the report will discuss
the proposed project design, required standards for MSA street routes, estimated
project costs, and the proposed financing, including a preliminary special assessment
roll.
The proposed project is shown on Exhibit 1: Project Location Map and the December 7,
2010 City Council resolution ordering preparation of the feasibility report is shown in
Appendix A: Reso/ution Authorizing Feasibility Report.
Proiect Leqal Description
The proposed project includes:
All properties in the SW 1/2 of Section 32, Township 118, Range 21; within the City of
Go/den Valley, Hennepin County, Minnesota, that are adjacent to the following streets:
• Harold Avenue from Winnetka Avenue North to Glenwood Avenue.
• Rhode Island Avenue North from Harold Avenue to the cul-de-sac south of TH
55.
1
Existinq Conditions
Sanitarv Sewer
Inf/ow and Infiltration
The Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) provides wastewater
treatment and interceptor collection services for the Twin Cities metropolitan
area. The MCES has undertaken a major effort to eliminate excess peak flows in
its system. These excess flows can and do result in overflows of raw sewage
into the Mississippi River.
Inflow and Infiltration (I/I) is defined as clear water that is either directly
discharged (inflow) or indirectly discharged (infiltration) into the sanitary sewer
system. Among the most common sources are improperly connected sump
pumps or foundation drains discharging into the sanitary sewer and the infiltration
of ground water through defects in sanitary sewer mains, services, and
manholes.
The City of Golden Valley is one of approximately 46 cities that have been
notified by the MCES that there are excess peak sanitary sewer flows being
generated by their community.
The peak flows in Golden Valley typically follow heavy rainfall events, indicating
that improper connections to the sewer system may be present, and those
sewers in low areas may be allowing ground water and surface water into the
system through cracked pipes, leaking manholes, and substandard castings.
Sewer Mains
The existing sanitary sewer system within the project area is primarily local
lateral sewers that were constructed in the late 1950s when sanitary sewer was
first available in the City. These lateral sanitary sewer mains consist of either
twelve-inch diameter reinforced concrete or nine-inch diameter clay pipes.
A closed circuit television inspection (CCTV) was performed on all of the City's
sanitary sewer mains within the project area as part of the preliminary project
design. This inspection was intended to locate the extent and severity of the
defects to the sanitary sewer system to determine if repairs are needed as part of
the street reconstruction project. The television inspection identified distresses
within the City system that are consistent with the age and pipe material. These
defects include cracked pipe, root intrusion, noticeable infiltration, and offset
joints.
Sanitarv Sewer Services
As part of its I/I Reduction Program, the City is offering the residents within this
project area an opportunity to have a CCTV inspection performed on the sanitary
sewer service to their home. The property owners are not charged for this
2
voluntary inspection, which is identical to the Point of Sale Inspections required
by City Code. The intent of this inspection is to identify I/I issues present in the
private sanitary sewer services and allow property owners to make informed
decisions regarding rehabilitation of the service lines, including voluntary
participation in the repair program offered as part of the Pavement Management
Program (PMP) project. This sewer service repair program will be discussed in
more detail later in this report.
Water Main
The majority of the existing water main system within the project area consists of lateral
mains that were installed during the early 1960s. These mains are either six or eight-
inch diameter cast iron pipe and are typically located within the existing City right-of-
ways.
Storm Water Drainaqe
The western end of Harold Avenue falls within the Bassett Creek sub-district of the
Bassett Creek Watershed. All other project areas fall within the Sweeney Lake sub-
district of the Bassett Creek Watershed. The following is a brief discussion of the
existing storm water facilities within the project area.
Storm water runoff from the western half of Harold Avenue is discharged via storm
sewer into a series ponds within Brookview Park, which then discharge into Bassett
Creek. Storm water runoff from Rhode Island Avenue and the majority of Harold
Avenue is conveyed via small existing storm sewers and connects into the trunk storm
sewer along Rhode Island and Harold Avenue, which flows southward into the ponds
adjacent to Laurel Avenue. Flow out of these ponds eventually discharges into
Sweeney Lake.
Streets
Harold Avenue is a bituminous residential street that was constructed as a gravel street
in the 1950s and improved to a bituminous street in the 1960's. The portion of Harold '
Avenue proposed for reconstruction is identified as a MSA local collector street in the
City's comprehensive plan and has been an MSA route since the system was
established by the State of Minnesota in 1959. As a local collector, Harold Avenue
provides service to single family residential, and multiple dwelling residential
neighborhoods from the adjacent county road and state highway system.
Street Widths
The street widths on Harold Avenue vary in width from 27 to 32 feet. Typical
street width on Rhode Island Avenue is 29 feet. Street widths are measured
from gutter flow line to gutter flow line.
Street widths can vary depending upon the location on any given roadway.
Please see Exhibit 3: Existing Street Widths for a reporting of the typical street
width for specific sections of Harold Avenue and Rhode Island Avenue North.
3
Pavement Sections
All the streets within the proposed project area have an existing asphalt
pavement.
The existing pavement depths vary from three inches (3") to seven and one-half
inches (7.5") with a typical thickness of approximately six inches (6").
Properly constructed asphalt streets are built with a base course of fill beneath
the pavement consisting of granular(gravel) material. This base course layer is
considered to be part of the pavement section. The soil borings taken in this
project area show that the majority of the base course fill consists of sand, sand
with silt, or silty sand fill with varying gravel content. Many of the soil boring
locations lacked the gravel content that would be required to meet today's
requirements for pavement base.
Silt was evident in the base course in many of the borings. The presence of silt
material makes the granular base susceptible to deflections due to moisture and
frost. Consequently the base tends to be unstable under traffic loads when wet,
especially during freeze/thaw conditions.
The pavement distresses present within the project area are consistent with the
age of the streets. Common pavement distresses include longitudinal and
transverse cracking, alligator cracking, edge cracking, and patching. Patching is
frequently used to cover severe distresses such as alligator cracking, and is
therefore indicative of poor pavement quality.
Subqrade Conditions
As part of the preliminary design for the proposed project, a series of 15 soil
borings were taken to determine the suitability of the existing materials for street
and storm water pond construction. These soil borings were also the source of
the pavement and base thicknesses of the streets.
The soil borings indicate that the subgrade soils (beneath the base or sub base)
in the project area vary widely with location and include areas of predominantly
sandy lean clay, clayey sand, and silty sand fill. The quality of the fill and natural
soils within the subgrade is generally of moderate to poor quality clayey sand
soils. Swamp deposits were encountered at isolated locations, specifically on the
west end of Harold Avenue near Winnetka Avenue.
Environmenta/Concerns
During the excavation phase of past PMP projects buried debris, including
construction related materials such as brick, concrete, asphalt and timbers have
been encountered. This material is typically encountered in low areas that were
filled as development occurred. The contract and specifications for all PMP
projects now include a contingency plan that addresses buried debris should it be
unexpectedly encountered during construction.
4
Concrete Curb and Gutter
Concrete curb and gutter does not exist on Harold Avenue or Rhode Island
Avenue.
All project areas contain rolled bituminous curb that was typically constructed by
pouring extra asphalt off the edge of the paver when the street was originally
built.
Pedestrian Facilities
A 5 foot wide concrete sidewalk constructed in 1978 currently exists along the
south side of Harold Avenue. Horizontal and vertical separation varies between
the street and sidewalk, likely the result of minimizing impacts during the original
sidewalk construction. The existing sidewalk does not meet current accessibility
laws and/or guidelines. The current accessibility standards indicate that
reconstruction of the roadway requires that the City construct the sidewalk to
meet standards.
No sidewalk exists along Rhode Island Avenue. However, sidewalk does exist
on the north end of Rhode Island Avenue connecting the Rhode Island cul-de-
sac with TH 55.
Street Liqhtinq
Street lighting exists along a portion of Harold Avenue. These street lights are
mounted on Xcel Energy poles. There are no existing decorative street lights in
the project area.
Proposed Improvements
This portion of the feasibility report will focus on the proposed design of the project. The
estimated project costs and project financing will be discussed later in this report.
Public Participation
As part of the preliminary design process, a project open house was held, and
project newsletters were published. The open house was held in June of 2011.
The first newsletter provided general information regarding the Pavement
Management Program prior to the Open House. Subsequent newsletters
provided updates on design topics during the preliminary design phase of the
project.
The open house provided residents with project information and provided a forum
for the property owners to express concerns and ask questions regarding the
proposed project. Residents were able to view the preliminary project design,
including anticipated impacts to landscaping, trees and driveways. Information
regarding the Driveway Reconstruction Program and the Inflow and Infiltration
Sewer Service Inspection Program was also available at these meetings.
5
Residents who were not able to attend the open house were mailed all the
information that was distributed at the meetings.
It should be noted that open house attendance, and all written comments
received at or following the open house meetings, is summarized in Appendix 8:
Summary of Resident Comments. These comments are an important tool for
staff to identify issues that need to be addressed as part of the project design.
The proposed improvements discussed in this portion of the feasibility report are shown
on Exhibit 2: Proposed Project Layout.
Sanitarv Sewer and Water Main
Sanitarv Sewer Rehabilitation
As discussed earlier in this report, a CCTV of the existing sanitary sewer system
was performed during the preliminary design portion of this project. Based upon
the results of this survey, it has been determined that a majority of sanitary sewer
mains within the project are in need of repair. The nature of the defects present,
primarily cracked pipes and root intrusion, indicates that most all of the sanitary
can be rehabilitated by structural lining.
Sanitary sewer lining will be effective in repairing the defects identified in the
sewer mains within the project area, and will be effective in addressing the
infiltration issues within the City's system.
The proposed sanitary sewer improvements are illustrated on Exhibit 2:
Proposed Project Layout.
In addition to lining the sanitary sewer mains, this project will incorporate other
measures to reduce the amount of Inflow and Infiltration being introduced into the
City's sewer main system. These I/I reduction efforts include the replacement of
all sanitary sewer manhole castings and covers; the reconstruction and sealing of
sanitary sewer manholes. These measures have been implemented in past PMP
projects, and are consistent with the City's efforts to address all sources of I/I.
Sanitarv Sewer Service Rehabilitation
As previously mentioned, residents of the Harold Avenue Reconstruction area
have been given the opportunity to voluntarily have their sanitary sewer service
inspected as part of this project and the City's ongoing Inflow and Infiltration (I/I)
Reduction Program. The intent of this voluntary inspection, which is funded by
the City's water and sewer fund, is to identify sources of I/I from the privately
owned sanitary sewer services. It also intended to let the property owners know
what sewer service repairs are needed in order to become compliant with City
Code. Each of the property owners can use the information provided in the
inspection to plan for future sewer service repairs, including participation in the
sewer service repair program offered as part of the proposed project.
6
Residents will be given the opportunity to have their sanitary sewer service
inspected starting in the fall of 2011.
Each property owner, including those who did not participate in the voluntary
inspection program, will be given the opportunity to have repairs performed on
their sanitary sewer service. These repairs will be performed in conjunction with
this project, but will be completed under a separate contract from the public
improvements. Homeowners will be able to have their sewer services lined, or
removed and replaced, as part of this program.
Water Main Rehabilitation
Water main rehabilitation includes localized repair and replacement of gate
valves, hydrants and water main fittings as needed along with sandblasting and
painting of existing hydrants. No other water main replacement is necessary for
this project.
The proposed water main repair areas are shown on Exhibit 2 Proposed Project
Layout.
Storm Water Manaqement
The western end of Harold Avenue is located in the Bassett Creek sub-district. All other
project areas fall within the Sweeney Lake sub-district. Both sub-districts are within the
Bassett Creek Watershed. Therefore, the construction project will be designed in
accordance with the Basset Creek Water Management Commission (BCWMC)
Requirements for Improvements and Development Proposals. This includes the
implementation of storm water best management practices (BMPs) as part of the project
design and during construction.
The proposed storm sewer improvements for the project area are primarily
modifications, extensions, and/or replacements of the existing storm sewer system to
help facilitate drainage of streets, rights-of-way and adjacent properties to the extent
feasible.
The proposed storm drainage improvements within the project area are shown on
Exhibit 2: Proposed Project Layout.
As with past PMP projects, a sump discharge drainage system is proposed throughout
the project area as needed. This sump discharge drainage system consists of a piping
system behind the curb and a service stub for potential connection of private sump
pump systems. The sump discharge drainage system is proposed for locations where a
significant number of sump pumps are present, and provides an alternative to above
ground discharge and improper connections to the sanitary sewer system.
7
Water Qualitv Measures
The project area was reviewed for opportunities to improve the water quality of
the storm water runoff generated within the project area that eventually
discharges into Sweeney Lake. These opportunities included constructing
� infiltration basins, storm water pond expansion, and storm water pond
construction. Many of these opportunities were found to not be feasible as the
costs outweighed the benefits.
One of the opportunities evaluated was Lions Park. It was reviewed as a site for
the potential to construct a water quality storm pond. A storm water pond in the
park was found not feasible due to a number of reasons as follows:
• Soil borings and past City work within Lions Park indicate a high likelihood of
encountering buried debris and potentially contaminated soils during pond
construction.
• The high water table poses risk. Pond construction would involve major
dewatering potentially affecting the foundations of neighboring homes.
• The soils consist of fill and contain swamp deposits. Traditional methods of
dewatering via well points is likely not an option. Dewatering operations
would most likely involve a perimeter drain tile system, resulting in higher
costs with the potential for decreased effectiveness.
• The possible threat of contamination requires the pond to be lined with a
synthetic liner to hold storm water in the pond and prevent the spread of
potential contamination that exists in the fill soils.
• Traditional maintenance practices for pond cleaning are not feasible as the
groundwater water pressure experienced under a drained pond condition
could push the pond liner upward like a balloon.
Other opportunities being investigated include constructing a storm water
treatment pond immediately adjacent to the project area near the Glenwood
Avenue intersection. Items being looked at are land availability along with the
treatment removals and overall cost in order to determine if the benefit received
would outweigh the cost to construct the pond. Estimated costs to construct this
storm water treatment pond (excluding land costs) can be found in the estimated
costs section of this report.
Storm sewer sump manholes containing Saint Anthony Falls Laboratory(SAFL)
Baffles will be installed throughout the project area. These sump manholes allow
larger debris and sediment in storm water runoff to settle out in the sump, where
it is cleaned out on a regularly scheduled basis as part of the City's maintenance
program.
The minimization of impervious surFaces such as pavement, which generate
higher volumes of storm water runoff than vegetated pervious surfaces, is a goal
of PMP design. Existing street impervious areas, post construction impervious
8
areas, and the amount of decrease in impervious area for the Harold Avenue
reconstruction project are shown below.
Post
Existing Street Construction Decrease of °�Reduction of
Impervious Area Impervious Area Impervious Area Impervious
(acres) (acres) (acres) Area
2.23 2.21 0.02 1.0�
While rain gardens, or infiltration basins, are not feasible due to the typical clayey
soils that prevent water infiltration into the subsurface, rain gardens designed as
filtration basins may be feasible. The City is eager to provide technical assistance
to individual homeowners if they desire to create a private "rain garden" filtration
basins on their property.
Streets
The City of Golden Valley Pavement Management Program stresses the use of proper
pavement rehabilitation measures for each street. After reviewing the streets within the
project area, it has been determined that reconstruction to City and State Aid standards
is the appropriate rehabilitation measure. This section of the report will discuss
proposed rehabilitation measures being recommended, as well as the structural and
geometric concerns encountered during preliminary design.
Street Widths
The Pavement Management Policy strives to maintain existing street widths
when a roadway is reconstructed. The policy outlines exceptions to this goal for
streets where high traffic volumes or unsafe traffic conditions are present that
could be resolved with additional street width. This portion of the Pavement
Management Policy has been adhered to in this project to the extent possible.
Since Harold Avenue is an MSA street, MSA design requirements for street width
and on-street parking were utilized.
MSA streets are required to be constructed to the following widths:
- MnDOT recommended width without parking, 26 feet. However, the City has
adopted 28 ft as their minimum standard for MSA streets.
- MnDOT recommended width with parking on one side of the street is 34 feet
During the public participation and design phases of the project, staff studied the
issue of parking on Harold Avenue. After consideration of public input, design,
and budget issues, it is recommended that the majority of Harold Avenue be
designed to a width of 28 feet without parking. A portion of Harold Avenue
abutting Lions Park is recommended to be 34 feet to allow one side parking
adjacent to the park.
Minimization of landscape impacts was the largest contributing factor in
recommending that Harold Avenue be 28 feet without parking. If on street
9
parking were accommodated for the entire roadway, additional construction
impacts would occur including retaining walls, trees, shrubs, and other exisiting
landscaping. In addition, parking would have a negative impact on sight distance
for motorists attempting to enter the roadway from their driveways and residents
ability to maneuver in and out of driveways.
Rhode Island Avenue is recommended to be 26 feet wide. In general, the street
width for Rhode Island Avenue was determined by selecting a proposed width
that closely fits the average width of the street, while also considering potential
impacts. Therefore, at any specific point on a street, the proposed street width
may be narrower, or wider, than the existing roadway.
The existing street widths are illustrated in Exhibit 3: Existing Street Widths. The
proposed width of each street is shown on Exhibit 2: Proposed Project Layout
and on Exhibit 4: Proposed Street Widths.
Subqrade Corrections
Based upon the subsurFace conditions encountered within the project area, it is
recommended that subgrade correction occur on Harold Avenue and Rhode
Island Avenue. Subgrade correction is performed by removing soft, moisture-
susceptible soils that are structurally unsuitable, and backfilling with suitable
granular material such as sand or gravel.
The subgrade correction planned for this project includes subcutting and
replacing the excavated soils with up to four feet of sand and/or light weight
aggregate and the City's standard bituminous and gravel street sections. The
final depth of subcuts to be constructed will be determined for each street in the
field based upon actual soil conditions encountered. Please see Exhibit 5:
Estimated Subcut Depths Soil Borings for an illustration of the proposed subcut
areas and depths.
The use of geotextile fabrics for additional subgrade stabilization is anticipated in
various locations within the project area, typically in areas where silty subgrade
soils have been identified. However, the actual need for geotextile fabrics will be
determined during construction based upon soils encountered in the field.
As previously discussed there are areas within the project that contain underlying
swamp deposits and organic soils. Standard subgrade excavation and backfilling
with granular materials is not feasible in these areas due to the high potential of
long term street settlements. Therefore, the use of lightweight aggregate is
proposed in these areas. The lightweight aggregate has a lower unit weight than
the granular soils typically used, which reduces the risk of settlement of the new
street, curb and gutter, and utilities.
The only location within the project where the use of lightweight aggregate is
proposed is from Winnetka Avenue to approximately 200 feet to the east.
10
Concrete Curb and Gutter
The standard type of concrete curb and gutter on Golden Valley streets includes
a 6-inch barrier curb and an 18-inch gutter(B618 curb and gutter). Because
MSA standards require curb and gutter for urban streets, the installation of
concrete curb and gutter is required.
The installation of concrete curb and gutter is also required by the City because
of its engineering and maintenance advantages. Curb and gutter provides
pavement edge support and protection, facilitates roadway drainage, and
eliminates the need for ditches. Given the practicality of curb and gutter and its
usefulness, the City's standard practice is to install concrete curb and gutter on
all streets in the project area.
Intersection Review
As part of the prelimininary design work for all PMP projects, City staff and the City's
consulting traffic engineer review street intersections in the project area for alignment,
safety and operational issues that should be addressed during street rehabilitation.
Upon review, a couple of the intersections needed minor enhancements, which include:
reducing intersection radii, minor realignment, and formalizing them with curb and
gutter. The extent of these modifications was not significant enough to warrant
neighborhood participation.
One example of such an intersection is located in the project area at the intersection of
Harold Avenue and Glenwood Avenue. The proposed design at the intersection
provides a more perpendicular alignment to provide better sight lines along Glenwood
Avenue and slower and more deliberate turns from Harold to Glenwood Avenue.
Please see the recommended change to this intersection illustrated on Exhibit 2:
Proposed project/ayout.
Pedestrian Facilities
A 5 foot wide concrete sidewalk currently exists on the south side of Harold Avenue.
This sidewalk will be removed and replaced with a new 6 foot walk on the south side of
Harold Avenue from Winnetka Avenue to Glenwood Avenue. The existing sidewalk
connecting TH 55 to the Rhode Island cul-de-sac will also be replaced. All sidewalks
will be designed to meet all current accessibility standards.
Street Liqhtinq
Street lighting exists along a portion of Harold Avenue. The street lights are mounted
on Xcel Energy poles. No additional street lighting is anticipated for this project.
Tree and Landscape Impacts
The proposed project outlined in this feasibility report includes minimizing impacts to
landscaping, trees and shrubs as a major design consideration. As a result, the impacts
have been minimized to the extent possible.
11
Potential impacts to the large oak tree (located less than one foot from the existing
roadway) on the north side of Harold Avenue at Ridgeway were evaluated. City forestry
staff have reviewed the health of the tree and concluded that the tree appears to be
healthy. Minor changes to the roadway alignment will help avoid tree impact. These
changes include shifting the proposed street alignment slightly south around the tree.
The shifted alignment does not appear to create any additional impacts on the south
side of the roadway.
Numerous alternatives to the preliminary street and sidewalk alignments were evaluated
to minimize tree impacts to the Vallee D'or property. Site constraints including minimal
right-of-way, conflicts with above and below ground utilities, storm water drainage
issues, and accessibility laws were included with this evaluation. It has been
determined that the removal of trees on the Vallee D'or property cannot be completely
avoided, an option has been chosen that will minimize impacts as much as possible
given site conditions that exist. Appraximately 10 trees must be removed adjacent to
Vallee D'or. Staff is working with representatives of the Vallee D'or association to
develop a plan for tree and shrub replacement.
The City Forester reviewed the proposed project to determine the extent of the
construction impacts and potential indirect impacts to trees. This review is included as
Appendix C of this report. The review also outlines steps to be taken during construction
to limit unanticipated impacts. The tree and shrub replacement program is also
discussed in this review.
As noted in Appendix C, the City Forester has estimated that there are approximately
20 trees and 56 shrubs that are likely to be removed for street and utility construction,
which includes the trees in front of Vallee D'or. The City's policy for unavoidable tree
and shrub loss during PMP projects is also discussed in Appendix C.
The extent of the potential tree impacts due to the reconstruction of sanitary sewer
services cannot be quantified at this time. Because maintenance of sanitary sewer
services is the responsibility of the individual homeowners, the removal and
replacement of trees and shrubs due to sewer service repairs will also be the
homeowners' responsibility. Any such tree removals will be included in the assessable
costs to perform the sanitary sewer repair, but replacement trees or shrubs will be the
responsibility of the property owner. The potential impacts to trees, shrubs and
landscaping is one of the primary reasons that lining of sanitary sewer services is the
preferred method of rehabilitation.
Drivewav Reconstruction Proqram
As with past PMP projects, single family homeowners within the project area whose
driveways are impacted by street reconstruction will be given the opportunity to have
their driveway replaced as part of the project, at contract unit prices. As part of this
program, residents have the option of having the driveway reconstruction costs
assessed against their property for a period of 10 years.
12
It should be noted that the City may reject homeowner participation in the driveway
replacement program in situations where the reconstruction is excessively complicated
or additional liability is incurred by the City during the reconstruction of the driveway.
This type of construction includes pavement removal or installation against the base of
retaining walls, foundation or basement walls or very flat or steep grades and proximity
to trees.
Estimated Costs and Proiect Financinq
Estimated Proiect Costs
The estimated costs for the improvements outlined in this report are separated by the
type of work and funding sources. These categories include utility work, storm drainage
improvements, and street reconstruction costs. The estimated project costs include
construction costs and an estimated 30 percent of the construction costs as indirect
costs. These indirect costs typically include project design, surveying, construction
administration, legal costs, and contingency.
Discussion on the financing and funding sources for the proposed improvements is
included in the next section of this report.
Sewer and Water Costs
The estimated sewer and water costs include all water main repairs, sanitary
sewer repairs, and maintenance as outlined within this report.
Harold Avenue (Non-MSA Funded):
Estimated Construction Costs = $ 309,700
Estimated 30% Indirect Costs = $ 96,800
Estimated Sewer and Water Total = $ 406,500
Rhode Island Avenue:
Estimated Construction Costs = $ 41,200
Estimated 30% Indirect Costs = $ 12,300
Estimated Sewer and Water Total = $ 53,500
Storm Drainage Costs
The estimated storm drainage costs include all storm sewer installation, water
quality measures, and erosion control.
Harold Avenue (MSA Funded):
Estimated Construction Costs = $ 155,900
Estimated 30% Indirect Costs = $ 46,800
Estimated Storm Drainage Total = $ 202,700
13
Harold Avenue (Non-MSA Funded):
Estimated Construction Costs = $ 43,200
Estimated 30% Indirect Costs = $ 13,000
Estimated Storm Drainage Total = $ 56,200
Rhode Island Avenue:
Estimated Construction Costs = $ 23,200
Estimated 30% Indirect Costs = $ 6,900
Estimated Storm Drainage Total = $ 30,100
Glenwood Avenue Storm Treatment Pond:
Estimated Construction Costs = $ 165,600
Estimated 30% Indirect Costs = $ 49,700
Estimated Storm Drainage Total = $ 215,300
Street Reconstruction Costs
The estimated street reconstruction costs include all subgrade correction,
pavement, curb and gutter, vegetation restoration, and landscaping costs. These
costs also include removal and replacement of decorative street lights within the
project area. In addition, the street reconstruction costs include quantities for an
estimated 20% participation in the private driveway reconstruction program.
Harold Avenue (MSA Funded):
Estimated Construction Costs = $ 977,200
Estimated 30% Indirect Costs = $ 293,100
Estimated Street Reconstruction Total = $ 1,270,300
Harold Avenue (Non-MSA Funded):
Estimated Construction Costs = $ 41,000
Estimated 30% Indirect Costs = $ 12,300
Estimated Street Reconstruction Tota! _ $ 53,300
Rhode Island Avenue:
Estimated Construction Costs = $ 115,000
Estimated 30% Indirect Costs = $ 34,500
Estimated Street Reconstruction Total = $ 149,500
Total Proiect Costs
Harold Avenue (MSA Funded):
Estimated Sewer and Water Costs = $ 0.00
Estimated Storm Drainage Costs = $ 202,700
Estimated Street Reconstruction Costs = $ 1,270,300
Estimated Total Harold Avenue Cost = $ 1,473,000
14
Harold Avenue (Non-MSA Funded):
Estimated Sewer and Water Costs = $ 406,500
Estimated Storm Drainage Costs = $ 56,200
Estimated Street Reconstruction Costs = $ 53,300
Estimated Total Harold Avenue Cost = $ 516,000
Rhode Island Avenue:
Estimated Sewer and Water Costs = $ 53,500
Estimated Storm Drainage Costs = $ 30,100
Estimated Street Reconstruction Costs = $ 149,500
Estimated Total Rhode Island Cost = $ 233,100
Glenwood Avenue Storm Treatment Pond:
Estimated Sewer and Water Costs = $ 0.00
Estimated Storm Drainage Costs = $ 215,300
Estimated Street Reconstruction Costs = $ 0.00
Estimated Total Glenwood Pond Cost = $ 215,300
Proposed Proiect Financinq
The proposed financing of this project is a combination of special assessments to
properties abutting the streets being improved, MSA funds, street improvement funds,
the Sewer and Water Reserve Fund, and the Storm Water Improvement Fund. The
following is a brief description of each of these funding sources and a summary of the
estimated amount to be funded from each source.
State Aid(MSA) Funds
The construction costs for Harold Avenue are proposed to be financed from the
City's MSA funds. A portion of the storm drainage costs for these streets is also
anticipated to be funded with MSA funds. The estimated project costs to be
financed from this source is shown below.
Harold Avenue MSA Street Improvements = $ 1,270,300
Harold Avenue MSA Storm Improvements = $ 202,700
Total MSA = $ 1,473,000
Specia/Assessments
The proposed special assessments for Harold Avenue and Rhode Island Avenue
Pavement Management Projects are consistent with the City of Golden Valley
Special Assessment Policy and Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. As outlined in
the Special Assessment Policy, residential properties are assessed on a per-unit
basis for each single family or duplex unit. Oversized lots that may potentially be
subdivided into additional conforming lots are assessed one unit assessment for
each potential lot. However, only one unit assessment is levied with the project;
with the other assessments being deferred until the property is subdivided.
15
Corner residential lots are assessed one-half unit for each of the lot's frontage
being improved, with no more than one full unit assessed, unless the lot could be
subdivided.
The residential special assessment rates for 2011/2012 have been established
by the City Council in its annual Fee Ordinance. The assessment rates that have
been established for this project are as follows:
- Local Residential (Rhode Island) _ $5750 per unit
- MSA Residential (Harold) _ $1437.50 per unit
- MSA Multi-Unit Residential (Harold) _ $81.71 per foot
- MSA Other Zoning (Harold) _ $99.21 per foot
As shown on Appendix D: Preliminary Special Assessment Roll, the following is
an estimated amount summary of street reconstruction costs to be financed
through special assessments.
Harold Avenue = $ 236,708
Rhode Island = $ 26,594
Total Special Assessments = $ 263,302
Sewer and Water Reserve Fund
The Sewer and Water Reserve Fund will be the funding source for all sanitary
sewer and water main work discussed within this report. The estimated amount
to be funded from this source is shown below. The Sewer and Water Reserve
Fund is financed from sanitary sewer and water utility fees.
Harold Avenue = $ 406,500
Rhode Island Avenue = $ 53,500
Total Sewer and Water Reserve Fund = $ 460,000
Storm Sewer Improvement Fund
All storm drainage improvements not funded by MSA, including lateral storm
sewer extensions, drain tile, erosion control, and storm water BMPs are funded
from the Storm Sewer Improvement Fund. The estimated amount to be funded
from this source is shown below. The Storm Sewer Improvement Fund is
financed from storm water utility fees paid by all properties in the City.
Harold Avenue = $ 56,200
Rhode Island Avenue = $ 30,100
Glenwood Avenue Storm Treatment Pond = $ 215.300
Total Storm Sewer Improvement Fund = $ 301,600
Street Improvement Funds
All street rehabilitation costs not funded by special assessments and/or MSA
funding will be funded using street improvement tax levies. These levies are used
16
to repay bonds sold to finance the project. The estimated amount to be funded
from this source is shown below. Harold Avenue will generate excess funds from
special assessments as a result of MSA contributions. All excess funds will be
deposited into the City's Street Improvement Fund.
Harold Avenue = $ -236,708
Rhode Island Avenue = $ 174,706
Financinq Summarv
The following is a summary of the amounts to be funded from each of the
sources discussed above.
Harold Ave. Rhode Island Ave.
State-Aid (MSA) Funds = $ 1,473,000 $ 0.00
Special Assessments = $ 236,700 $ 26,600
Sewer and Water Reserve Fund = $ 406,500 $ 53,500
Storm Sewer lmprovement Fund = $ 56,200 $ 30,100
Street Improvement Funds = $ -183,400 $ 122,900
Estimated Total Project Cost = $ 1,989,000 $ 233,100
Glenwood Ave. Storm Pond
State-Aid (MSA) Funds = $ 0.00
Special Assessments = $ 0.00
Sewer and Water Reserve Fund = $ 0.00
Storm Sewer Improvement Fund = $ 215,300
Street Improvement Funds = $ 0.00
Estimated Total Project Cost = $ 215,300
Summarv and Recommendations
This feasibility report for Harold Avenue Reconstruction project including Rhode Island
Avenue has been prepared in accordance with the Golden Valley City Council's
authorization on December 7, 2010. The proposed improvements are part of a city-wide
Pavement Management Program adopted by the City in order to provide a high-quality
street system in a long-term, cost-effective manner. The Pavement Management
Program also includes the replacement and rehabilitation of the existing sanitary sewer,
water main, and storm sewer systems as needed with each project. The resolution
ordering preparation of the feasibility report is shown in Appendix A: Resolution
Authorizing Feasibility Report.
Harold Avenue is designated as an MSA local collector in the City's comprehensive plan
and carries approximately 1050 vehicles per day. The surrounding land use is
predominantly a combination of single family residential and multiple dwelling residential
with park and open space nearby.
This report discusses the proposed improvements to streets illustrated on Exhibit 1:
Project Location Map. The public improvements outlined in this report are to be
17
constructed in 2012. The sanitary sewer service repair program will be performed in
conjunction with this project, but under a separate contract. A summary of the proposed
improvements is as follows
Utilitv Improvements
The majority of the sanitary sewer work proposed for the project area is limited to
lining of existing sanitary sewer mains to repair existing defects to the sewers.
The City offers an optional sanitary sewer service repair program that residents
may choose to participate in to rehabilitate their privately owned sanitary sewer
services. The costs of the private sanitary sewer service repairs may be specially
assessed to the benefiting property and will be completed in conjunction with this
project, but under a separate contract.
Water main work proposed for the project area includes localized repair and
replacement of gate valves, hydrants, and water main fittings as needed along
with sandblasting and painting of existing hydrants. No other water main
replacement is necessary for this project. The water main improvements are
shown on Exhibit 2: Proposed Project Layout.
The estimated utility cost for the proposed sanitary sewer and water main work
discussed within this report is $460,000. The estimated total includes
construction and indirect costs. This portion of the project will be funded from the
Sewer and Water Reserve Fund.
Storm Drainape Improvements
The storm drainage improvements proposed as part of this project consists
primarily of modifications, extensions, and/or replacements of the existing storm
system to help provide adequate drainage on all streets within the project area.
In addition, the storm drainage improvement includes a sump drainage system
installed behind the curbs throughout the project areas and the installation of
sump manholes and erosion control items as discussed in this report. Various
catch basins and storm manholes will be replaced and/or removed as needed,
according to their existing condition.
Other opportunities being investigated include constructing a storm water
treatment pond immediately adjacent to the project area near the Glenwood
Avenue intersection. Items being looked at are land availability along with the
treatment removals and overall cost in order to determine if the benefit received
would outweigh the cost to construct the pond.
The estimated cost for the proposed storm drainage improvements discussed
within this report is $504,300. The estimated totals include construction and
indirect costs. Storm water related costs within this project are to be funded from
local State Aid funds ($202,700) and the Storm Sewer Improvement Fund
($301,600).
18
Street Improvements
The street improvements proposed as part of this project include street
rehabilitation as follows:
Harold Avenue = 0.52 miles MSA
Rhode Island Avenue = 0.06 miles Local Street
The proposed street reconstruction within the project area has been designed
according to City and State Aid standards including the installation of concrete
curb and gutter and asphalt pavement. The proposed street widths have been
minimized to the extent possible to avoid and minimize impacts to trees and
landscaping.
The improvements to all streets within this project are shown on Exhibit 2:
Proposed Project Layout.
The estimated cost for street reconstruction discussed within this report is
$1,473,100. The estimated totals include construction and indirect costs. All
street rehabilitation costs not funded by special assessments will be funded using
local State Aid funds and street improvement tax levies.
Recommendations
Public Works staff has determined that the improvements outlined in this report are
feasible from an engineering perspective. These improvements are consistent with the
City of Golden Valley Pavement Management Program and the State of Minnesota
State Aid requirements. The project will benefit the community and those properties
abutting the proposed improvements. The cost-effectiveness of the proposed
improvements should be determined by the City Council.
Staff recommends approval of City Improvement Project No. 12-02, Harold Avenue
Reconstruction Project as discussed within this report. Staff further recommends that
the City Counci( authorize advertising for bids to construct the project.
19
Appendix A: Resolution Authorizing Feasibility Report
Resolution 1Q-70 December 7, 2010
Member Pen#el introduced the following resolution and moved 'rts adoption:
RES�LUTION ORDERING PREPARATiON OF
FEASIBILITY REPORT F'(�R IMPROVEMENT
CITY PROJECT 12-Q2
HAROLD AVENUE AND RHODE ISLAND AVENUE NORTH
WHEREAS, it is proposed to reconstruct the streets lis#ed below and to assess the
benefited properties pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429 for the following streets:
� Harold Avenue: Glenwood Avenue (CSAH 4Q}to Wnnetka Avenue North (CSAH
156)
• Rhode Island Avenue Norti�: Harold Avenue#o the cul-de-sac just sauth of TH 55
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Ciiy Council of the City of Golden
Valley, Minnesata that the proposed improvements be referred to the City Engineer for
study and that he is ins#ructed to report to the Council with all convenient speed advising
the Counci) in a preliminary way as to whe#her the proposed improvemen#s are feasible
and as to whether they should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other
improvements, and the estima#ed cost of the impravements as recommended.
r
� �'/���'
Linda R. Loomis, Mayar
ATTEST:
�
U
usan M. Virnig, Gity Clerk
The motian for the adoptian of the foregaing resolution was seconded by Member ShafFer
upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Freiberg, Loomis,
Pentel and Shaffer; and fhe follawing was absent: Scanion, and the following voted against
the same: none, whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed
by the Mayor and her signature attested �y the City Clerk.
This Page Left Blank Intentionally
_ �� �
����
�
Q
�
�
F
Q
�
J
Z �
� �
J F
�
w �'� � �
O �
� N O
� w
' � �
�
z
�
a
9
�
� /d'69 . 5269 � RPZ .� ; \ R � _
� ��� 6Z69
h � �� y (
9l � � �69 /�69 �O OI8' M `� \ , � \'
�e `�` h o a o 0
seoe iov� � �` � � � �
�
o ^ 9��� N 3Atl tlNVISYIOI
� 9S/L
� ZBIL
OGG6
•-ors a�ae
�-.
�-ecs
9ez �
iZ6 � p '. c � �'
� � h \ h c +� � p d
� q e ^ � ^ � ^Q
Od'6L n �y �
y $ ° n �
: "� ovice °� � n � �
� � � oaie �, `4y e n
a �`' n � $
ti d g osii c ti c � � •f�q
� � n dHo � �
� } ooi.t � � � � � �
2
~ g �� �
8 � y�
n
0 �
y s ♦ h
�° � �S
O!l � o�o
e� sz h� :��
� o >_
"n�
a�
oeae
o �\►_
o N
�
� � g m
(9s► ON li�n
N 3NV tl�13�NM
� uep � __. s ii / ' - �� �-aou�o�.���� ti�.�:i A'iya���.���—r`�. �.i�-,Fi�[`r'��r_A�_
S �� ��� P�' �� a
�a� s � � � � � ��
���� <�� ° � � � ' �'
tl" ;' � � � �� � ; � �'i� ��k'�
o �U�"_�o�g ' s� �� �e�� - - �' � °m
� F$F$o F�wg � �s° �° $�� . . — I
� Wg9 W �� g� � 9.
g i � ��
� ��� � �� ��'� �� � �,.�.� � �
�� � '� _ -
� � \' '�` �: w �
' :� Z �
� V
' �j� ''N'�Rd`dN`dlSlflO� a �
i f,� � � �
- ' .�C�' i Q W
�_; ; � �;� �
,�Y ' � � i�� o
I ��� .�. ,� �
�
d
� ' .,
I � ,
� p I �,' e
, ° �
- � F, .;- ` `
.__,
.__,
----•- ----- -�------ '��• ___..?� , ; I .
• �
E �
'N'�A`d dNdlSl 3�OHki a
a Z 'I � �a
J
i� f — > '�p _ I > �
, ; • Q {: � w z �
� � Z
, : —'_ o !; ! o�
, J
� � � �
--- X
� � t', Q `,� i i
W f i 2 ;� �;
� � ' : ;
�; .
Z � . , : , �
> { '� ` i ��.
� � �� £ i �;;
� ' ' r: I � �� �
¢ � I � � ; ' `
2 '� � �
� � �
i ' Q �(b� o
�, ��� t�� s ••, �
i 4F.
`l 'i ,
i"
I' � `�`� I �
'�' i i� � ,� �'�� _ �.,
� � '
, �
, '',
Li, : , $o
• ,� .� i o�o
� '�,P �:--- :��
- - - -
-
, , . . ��,
, ,, . . „�
.;, �� , <�
; , >.
_ , . W
,. sa°
' ... . Z 4, \\�
'�Ad`d�LL3NNIM ; � -
,.;-�,;
� . , I
��awv m aa�wz/sc/s aro���xs�siv�\�iawa\W�-+\secsu\wro�\�\M�s
This Page Left Blank Intentionally
This Page Left Blank Intentionally
�� M
��°�
�
�
0
3
�
� � � � � � � �
� 1111 � � �'
z
E
�
X
W
�
�
Uc�q,�l_ o �
�
g O
U
g w
¢
� w
�
z
w
>
� --- � a
l669 . S8'69 � OZd � � ; \ �
T� �� ` 6289 h O
V � � � �
trae � b rs.v iis.v `O oia ti � � � � 2
va�
°n
, szoe iooi
� � � � �
g � ^ ���� N 3Atl tlNVISlf10
� 9S/G
� ^ CBlG
n
��
x-ors size
zz-ars 9cz
o s' p,
p � eze ��� � y� ^i 9 h r7�
`b � � � � � n � r a�
� ocei ��,� � °� � � �
y � ^ � � . �
� 's arr� °< � a �
h h Q � h
� ee�it _ � ti�' � � � ^._...,C�l
s y � �9 � � �
"v � � aer� = �,� g �
h � _ `� `� �, �� n ^
�
� � oiie — � n n � n
I <
� �
� � �
o �
h p�
� h
�
2 �
31
� \ 0 h ��
n
Ol ��� il h�
� O
�� ��o
:yr
osei
� � � v'3
: : °°. � ���
�(95� ON HJFU — \_
N 3�tl tl�.L3JMM \ W
N
,__iuN , _ �: I ., _,_ =ec�Alcy� �aars Hr.c��A=uJ� r ,J�_.�� _ ����'P1'=''>�'�-��-
- ___ _- --- -- --
�� �
N
F
�� CYf
�z
F
�
�
� � � $ g � W
� � � � � 0 �
0
�
� o
�
0
8 �
�
0
F
— c�� o �
g �
N �
U
g ¢
� w
�
z
w
>
� -- � a
lf6B 5869 � GL�B � � ; \ �
Tm �� 626.� h i�
4 A ti y� Q
zrae � e is.v iiss `O o�z ti � � � � _
vai
�
, sz� ioo�
M � � � �
�
� � ^ 9�� N 3AV tlNVISlf10
� 9S/L
O
n � 2BlL
OOZG
LL'-O/S 9/PL
�a-ars .�ez
o �'
o � oac � A h � ^� 'n ��
h n ^ � ^ � � � � a�
� aece n y ` � � �
� � � � �
� aici °� n a �
h h � ` �
Odll � ° ry � n ^�
a > � �� � n �Q
� a = oei� c �c dHo g � � �}_i
^ � W ovi.� — � n � � � �
r-
�
y � � �
0
"n �
^ ��
�
e �
�
r ��
� �e s h
or � �
��
�F oz �
�
� �
�� �g
:��
06BL
0 'g�
0
� a � m �.,�
�(95L ON HOF1) n=
N 3�tl VH13�M \\N
.,q.i,p ir. � _ ; � C_, �/: anF�I�A�Fp• ��•,�_._� ncy� �d, t'�iiA=w�,��9�-}�. ��.�F��,,'..,:�v_A�_
This Page Left Blank Intentionally
�� �
�
g�
� �� o�
�o
��
�� ��
� �� � �o
5 0°
� 11 � ��
�
s
�
0
��,�-- o �
�
�
8 Z
N 0
U
g w
¢
� w
�
z
w
>
� __� � a
�es.v sas9 ry aa � � � � �
�' i°°� szss ^+ O
� � �3�i� Q
�aat � 'O is.v iiss `° aiz ry " � � � 2
vai ``
szoe ioa� � � � � �
�
° � °^ ���� N 3Atl tlNdlSlflO
9S/L
� �
^ n dBlL � �i
m �
0026 � �
'�-�S BlPL �� �
IZ-OPS 9fZ �
� p 9,
h n IlC �S � \ h c � � � e r'>>
� � a a F �
� oere n y s ^ � �
� " n n . �
� aree � � �
h h g � °a q
azi� � h�' e � 'S
� } � ^9 ^ � g e�
� a � ocii � �c � �
� °� � � ♦
� � W oii.� — � n n � � �
r-
a
y o �
� ��
o �
� ��
n
e �
e s a h �
n — F
ori `_-�
\\ __ hII��
e� °z ��
� �
�IIIIIII $g
__ P�A
ocse
♦ � �
� � $ � a��
`� � �x
N 3Atl VH13�NN� \\►+�
(9Sl ON H�H) �
. _�,3H�,y �.._i�_ ii��/�� :����F��i�oN,�-a 5 ci�•.�iiA=na�a•��.,�.,�,-r�.. ,i�.,.ci,�` ��.r_��.
This Page Left Blank Intentionally
This Page Left Blank Intentionally
v � —
_ = � v
a = .- �
= ti m ; m �
a < <
v � � :> v
� � o � —
� a � � � o
°' " ` = e
e � ; � _
V i W m � � C
w � y _° � v �
0
� � N c T, � '�
O � v � V �
n w +L' -
�`0_ " �o. w �
z° � 3 � � � �
� `y u y
n �j N O
'^ a`
a
m
� x
c
m
n
£
�
�
d
'C c
L
� N
U
r+ a+
� u
N a�+
� y
� a
O a � d
u =
w � ° o " x x x
,� Qo =
�
0
x
c
a �
a o �
O � E
� W � o
� �
� a
d � v
Q °1 E
'6
p d im m � �o �n �o M N .a �n e
L £ o rv ui m �o m �n � n �p
N a ° o m e a � .�-� n u`^i *�',
S z � N a a N v v e N a e
d Vl � ul N N vl v1 ut �ll vf uf
m � tmD tM0 lMD lmD e�i tm0 tMD lM0 lmD tmD tM0
X a. n n n n lD n n r n n n
�
�
�
Q
Q.
Q � �
� C � ?
� C d .' W
y � -°a E usi
m
3 N � �'n r � e 2'
` � o
Y m � Z c c o � v m
o m � 3 Y c o � � � � � p � O
- _ z � > Y c >. � � x w � ` 3 ¢ > c
a LL= v = v x � i: � y ;� J Z � ,�`� Y t O v « `m -�
¢ oo m m � m ¢ ¢ � -a � w� � m C� �a+ m m
.`-, -° z o � ` v m c m � � t �°� o � y r � _ �
.c c � £ w � u c w `v `m w � � o >
� V � H � Y u � U' �A C Q N (7 (7 VLi H � w g � Y
y N N
y J J
N W W W N W W N W W W W W N W W W W W W W W N W W N N W W W W W W W W W W W W W N N N L L
> > > > > > > > J > > 7 > > > > > > > > > 7 7 7 > > > 7 > > > 7 > > > 7 3 > > > > > 3 �
Q Q C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C G C C C C C C C
w w w w v w w m w m w w w m w v w v w m w w w a w w v v m m v v w m m w w w w w w w
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > � > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
°o °o a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a
. 3 3 v v v v v v v a v v v v v a v v v v v v v a v v v a v v v a v v v a v a v c v v v v
c c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o Q o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
m w m m m m m m m m m m ` m m m m m m ` •.
l7 l7 S 2 x x 2 = 2 2 2 S 2 S = = S 2 2 2 2 S S S 2 = 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 S S S 2 S 2 2 2 S 2
G
Z Ill Ill tD lD N O W l0 O O p O Ill O Yl N p� lfl �ll I� Ol e4 M Yl � � � M �Il I� Ol HI M VI 1� Ol � Ul .1�.1 �
N V' N � � 00 O T N M Q N N M V lp O1 O O O O O ti N N N N N m m O O O O O ti
m o N N N m m m e e a a v uf �n in �n �n in in in �n �n vi ui �n ui u� �n in u� �o �o �o �o �o �n � �o io �
o �o n n n n n n n n i. n n n i. n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n r n n n n n n n n n n n n n n
x
v
�
� j T W C '� 0
N C �j' � N � Y ` >
C �10 � L � O C E O j
>_ - ��/1
w a � m o � o w w v`
m
� 2 � — f0 >�- Y �
E • o
u � � 3 v c o ` � m
o '
c :. B ; a a m �a o
�, v ,s, « «
c c n c '� v o � �
0 0 � � a 3 � c7 2
m W w d
•� � Z a c
� N o
� a
s
A
� T
C
�
� �
N �
W
�C C x
L
� N
v
.� d
a�, d
E ;,
E a
O � � d
� � p� � x x x
� �
Vl Q =
�
�
_
_
a -
O ��
a
�
c
a
>
Q
�
0 w .� m a m n co o ao
f�0 E n .a-� o m .-�i o�o n W m
2 z'
N u�i m vmi v�i uai �N Vi v`ti u�i
m 0 N1 m m m m N m m M
�( a � n � n I� N h I� I�
�
�
�
fl.
Q L L
m L L �
C Z V V �
�
. O m _° _° a '. ' —
{,' ` o c w = = _ � v
� w v m � ~ a ~i — m m m c Y
a � � � � z �° LL w � > > > > o
� T > T y N � y C C C C
a`
m � = = c 0 � � w y 9i v c c c c c a a a � o
v c y = � > > m Q � p = � � m m m m m � � � Q
� °0 � � o v v ` m s � 01 � � o � '� � `� '� `o 0 0 � m
-o y � 3 � p o c u � � c m Y c c c c c ya, y ya, � �
� � � � p c7 l� u l�7 � ¢ m` m' m` 'u u u u u t�i 'u i� 'u a
r C ti C r r Y r
� � z Z 2 2 2 Z Z z
O O > > > > > j > >
}N' Z Z C G C C c C C C
` w w w w w w w m w w w m w w w w m w w w w m w w w w c' c' a' a' a' a' a' a' a' a' � v
� > > > > > > 3 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > m w
c c c c c c 'c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c ? > � c c c c c c c z z
w w w w w w w w w �i w w m w w w w w w w w m w m w w ¢ a �
a' a' a' a' a' a' a' a' a' a a' a' a' a' a' a' a' a' a' a' a' a' a' a' a' a' � � � � � � � � » » o ''
v v v -o -o a v v a v a a a v v v -o v a a a a a a -o v !o �? v y y y y w w w v v
0 0 o O o 0 0 0 o O o 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O !^ '^ � 'a 'a 'a 'o a v a
A N N N N N N N N N N 0 p L L L L L L L L � �
S S S 2 S S 2 = 2 = 2 2 2 2 S S S 2 2 S 2 S 2 S 2 S K K K K K K K fG a' K
C
Z m �n n m m in n m m ui n m m �n o o v o a <v o o m
Nrv N N N N m m m m m v e v v v �n �n �n o o v N m m � � "' °p a' "' ''^ o 0
�o �o �o �o � �o � � � �o � �o �o �o �o �o �o �o � �n �o n n n o0 00�v � o o .� m m
o r� n n n n n n n n � n n n n n n n r n n n n r� n n n m a � v a v r n
x
This Page Left Blank Intentionally
Appendix C
� Memorandum
�� ��
� � � � Public Works
763.593.8030/763.593.3988(faxj
Date: November 14, 2011
To: Jeff Oliver, PE, City Engineer
From: AI Lundstrom, Park Maintenance Supervisor/ Forester
Subject: Tree and Shrub Impacts: 2012 Pavement Management Program— Harold Avenue
Based upon the preliminary design for this project, staff has established an estimate of the
potential tree and shrub impacts for the 2012 Pavement Management Program along Harold
Avenue.
A limited number of significant trees will be removed due to street reconstruction, utility repairs
and installation. A significant number of trees located in the right-of-way have been designated
for tree protection. This protection may include fencing and directionalized boring or tunneling
under these trees when new gas mains and gas services are installed. The final determinations
of the tree and shrub removals will be made in the field during construction.
The following is a breakdown of the potential tree impacts:
➢ Approximately twenty(20)trees and fifty six(56) shrubs may need to be removed and
replaced for the proposed street, sidewalk and utility construction.
➢ Impacts to trees and shrubs due to utility service repairs are anticipated to be low.
Recommended repairs for sanitary services will include lining in most circumstances as
opposed to removal and replacement.
The City Forester and Assistant Forester will be responsible for monitoring and inspecting tree
and shrub impacts during the entire project. If tree or shrub removal is required, each will be
replaced on a minimum 1-to-1 basis. Additional trees or shrubs are added for larger removals.
A color photo list of replacement trees and shrubs with information regarding their
characteristics including mature size and growth habits is provided to each resident that may be
impacted.
The replacement shade trees are 2-'h inches in diameter at the base and balled in burlap.
Replacement evergreen trees are approximately six feet high. The trees are furnished, installed
and warranted for finro years by the contractor. Replacement trees and shrubs can be located
anywhere on the adjacent homeowner's property. The forestry staff provides consulting
services for residents who would like help choosing replacement trees and their locations.
Certain restrictions apply to corner visibility and right-of-way areas.
S:\FJ\G\Goldv\115792\4-rprt\WordWppendix C Harold Ave Memo.docx
This Page Left Blank Intentionally
N
�
N
a
�
0
�
1'. o00 0000000000000mrnm �n000 � �n0000
N �n �n �n �n �n �n �n vi vi �n vi vi in �n �n u� rn n �o n i.n �n ui a n o 0 0 0
N I� 1� I� I� 1� 1� I� I� I� t� I� I� 1� I� I� I� V1 1� O m I� 1� I� 00 M O O O O
M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M d' M N pl rtl M M I� 01 Vl l!1 Vl VI �
¢ avv vcvavvvavvvvaaornm �navv rn �nnnni.
� .�-I�-I c-I N �-I.�-I'-I '-I c-I'-I rl'-I c-1'-I '-I e-I N 1�N M e-I�-1 rl �-1 M V1 V1 V1 V1
O M �D
'j .ti
J V/tA1? N V/t/f Vf aA V?N VftAt?N VTN V/V/tM1NN V?VTNIA V/NNtR V?N Vf Vf t/f tR
9N
�
` £ M
N �
y Q c-i
C
�A�/T V? N�A VT N VT VT V/VT VT V?VT v?tR N'A Vf Vl tA V�Vf�A�A VT Vf VT N VT tA tA V�Vf lA
Y
.0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O p O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
7
.--I .-i .�-I a-I a-1 .�-� .�-I c-I e-I .-1 .�-I c-1 .�-I .-� c-I .�-i O O O .-� .-� .-i N .y r1 O .-1 c-I c-I .�-I .-i O O O
VI
N
K
d N N N N Ol N N m .��-I Ol Ol O1 O Ol �-^i �^-I c^-I
H M �
z "'� uj� � 00 O '� '� � a0 00 00� 00 .C-1 .��-I c�-I
�� �
0�0 O O p O �/1 00 I� Vl O Vl O O a0 O O � 00 �O O O O O N �D O O O
1a � l0 O O O .-� O O .-I O c-1 O O O O O � � 1� �O � � i� O V I� 1� �D O O@ O O O O
C n 01 O O O o0 01 01 00 O o0 O o0 01 � O � � N M M N l0 O Ol .-i N M O O C O O O O
p � � O O O � O O � O � O O O ..-� .-� � Op M .-I � � .-I .-I .-1 .-I lD .�-I c-I .�-I .--� VI u1 V1
LL
�
O
O. m � C u u
� C 09 v C 41 L L
O � O 'a �
� � a C � �n VI L J C N ��il � O!
3 L Y ✓
p v, " v o O 'c ° �' ,° c-•°- o o ° ` c
x N o v .`�- ,�' m � � °c c o m r r m o r - w w w v
w c m �o u w v a� -o x m m m m
�p Q s `�° � c c � °' Y � O eo m m � � ° � � r �w w r > > > >
3 �
Q� � � o a c � s c > � > >� o •'-` -c _° w a3i Q w w c w v � =y �6 `m v c c c c c v v �
c, y a` w y = � Y � 'u, � ay LL > Z � � ii t p` m m m � � ° 3 = � o m m A 'o m o 0 0
av� � C ,. +� LL= • � m � QY J � A Y � o > > mQ �n o � � � mmmmmc7c7C9
�a E U C � � � C Q 00 t6 v C w � G � v@ m� O � d UJ O/ � 'O R '6 J � �p ` m t` @@
� m 7i O O O O
c �6 0/ � � " m .°C o � � �O �' � � L � m o `� m v °—' v v � � � � � c m �. C C c c c �' �' �'
O > N N N N L `t C fp �l E W � u C L � � L L m O O W N � ' W W W N N
E `m a n a n a � V _ H � Y LL � l7 v� 'z Q vi c7 c7 �n � > c7 l7 U l7 � � m m m V V V V V c� c� c� iU
� '~ O � I� N
a � o � �-i oi � � � n n n � n n r� n n n n � n � n n n n n n n n n n r� n n n r n n r
^ a � � N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N tV N tV N N N N N N N N
v v � v v v i.'�i � �i �i �i �i �i v v v c v v a a v v v �i � �i �i �i a a a a a a
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
vi ri � ul u1 v1 in �n ul u1 Ln �n �n u1 u1 u1 v1 v1 u� �n �n �n �n �n �n �n �n �n �n �n u1 �n v� ul ul �n v1 v�
� Z Z Z Z 2 Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z 2 Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z
A � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
> > > > > > > > > T > > T T > ? > > > ? T T > > > > > > > > ? ? > > ?
\ N N N N N W N W W W W N W N N N N W N W W N N N N N N W W W W W N N W
� f0 f0 f6 16 l0 f0 f0 f0 16 (0 f6 f0 16 l6 f0 f6 l6�l0 l0 10 10 @ l6 10 l6 l6 R f0 f0 f0 f0 f0 m m f0
� V > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1 > > >
C C C C C C C C C C C C G G C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C G C C C C
N N N N N W N N N N N N W N N N N N W W N W N N N N N N W N W W N N W
aa -o vvvv -o -oa -o -ovvavvvvvvvavv -ava -ovvvav -o
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
N�y�N O O O O O O .O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
C7 (7 C7 C7 U (7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 l7 l7 (.7 (7 (7 t7 U (7 (7 U U' C7 C7 l7 C7 C7 C7 (7 (:J (7 V t7 (7
L L L L L L L L
O O O O O O O O
� � � Z Z Z Z Z 2 Z Z
0 o w a) W W N W W W
> > > > > > > >
y N G/ Z Z G C C C C C C C
` J J G1 4! O/ N OJ N N Ol O! 41
C C 7 > > > > > > > > >
N v v v v v v v v v v o, v v v v v v v v v v v v v v � � a a a a a a a a
n > > > � > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > w w
Q Q C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C > > C C C C C C C C
v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v a a
'O 'O > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @ @ m m m m �a m m �a
°o °o a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a � � �
3 3 -o vvvavavav -o -ovavvvvvvvvv m m
n c c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .� � � � � � � � �
� v v a a a v v v
� v m m m m m m m m m m ia m m m m m m` m m io r`p i`p �`p > > O O O O O O O O
� �� U' C7 2 2 = _ = S 2 2 2 S 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 = _ _ � � K K � � L1' � K K
� II
v+ aa o
m °' a Z �n �n �o � NOao �ca000 �no �n �nmoovov � oo
�c ;: w vNa �naoo .-� mc� maNNmv �omoov .� Nmmao .� .� 0000, .�+ m
0 t6 Vl Ol O .i '-I '-I N N N M M M V V V V V tf1 lD lD l0 I� 1��I� 00 00 C ll1 O O c-I �--1
. '^ u o � n r � � n n n n n n n n n n n � r� i. i. i. n � n n m .� v v v v a
�
w a�i m a x
� � N *' Ol O 1� lD M � Vl �D 00 Ol 00 I� I� Ol lD u1 .-1 O .�-I O u1 M N .�-I O M V V1 Ol R O M �O I� a0 .
N N ;O � 1� N c-1 .�-I O O O O .�-I .-I O O O O O O V1 �-1 O V �"� .ti .�-� N N 00 M M M M .ti M rtl M M
�, goo 00000000000000 $ 00000000000000000
a" � " ,� o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
d' C M N a-I �-I .-I '-I '-I ey rl rl ei 'i � c-1 � 7 M e-1 N N N N N N N M O N N N tV N N N N
� � Q V C t�'1 M M M M M M M M M MI n'1 M M M M M M M M M M M C M t�'1 th rvl M M M M M
. . t' C 'i '-I ci �-I �-I '-I '-I '-I '-I rl '-I '-I '-I c-I e-I '-I �--I N e-I M rl rl a-I a-i ei �-i rl a-I '-I '-I '-I '-I ei a-1 M
C O 6 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
C c � N W 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 OD 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
'�O '�6 '- �-i rl �--I '-I �-1 'i a-I rl .�-I .-i .-I e-I ri e-1 e�i '-I 'i c�l c-I '-I '-I rl c-1 .-i c-I �--I e�l ed rl rl rl ri '-I c-I '-I
_ t+ N e�i �-i �--1 '-I a-1 rl a-I .-I '-I e-I '-I e-I 'i �-1 rl 'i 'i e�l �-1 '-I '-I e-I c-0 c�l c-1 '-1 �--1 ei �-i rl rl a-I �-1 �-i '-I
� � L N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
� � � O M M M M M M M rtl M t�'1 M M M rvl M M M M M M M M M M rtl M c�'1 rvl M K1 M M M M M
This Page Left Blank Intentionally
£
�
a
�
0
�
£ � � ^
M M 1ff
y Ol O1 'i
Q t+l M M
W b
'j N
J �� �
1� �
N y P
y £ C
d Q rl
C
N N �?
�C � �
� .
. O O
N
N
C
11
y ti � y� 11
O „'� C i^
Z � £ d
h £
� y
�^ N
N C �p Q
Q '-i � d
�
N > .
C - O
n w
.10, ` `o
� � � ' o c � �- t aTi
f. N O y N �..� 2
y uai n •.�. w 'o E Z N vi � � �
a oi �^ o �n
c v � �n ° ry !� � v � �� v�i c .
� � v w m
3 > v`ni � o v .�-i .�i @ �a °-' o Z � � v
p m c Z v� v w �n � .� ao in .a m v Q , Q .
T ai a�n . ao an > � Y
L c Y � 16 > a N Z o�c � � � w w ` a � ,�..
o, ° '^ �:� m 'O m � .- z °' w m Evv c � • �o
'c N
O �� - v w m o rn .'� mv_ - oa .° a � u°
y � o c � v > > m �^ m � f0 ' '^ � c7 w "' o w � '_°
. c ° °J > ° c v x o �y - m � z •'-6 « -o '° ^ o v o c
Q � c � v � o v 3 f6 E a c m in . a°o `� •' � v
� m N "c > o O `° � - v � m s a m � c � � w m � v_
� J � � Q �' c L p "'. o �v, v 'v v y�w � 3 «", o �; oN°ic
a �° .�i'> p � w v a� i� '`-° o � E f0 noi w L ` _m,
n n °' ° x � ,�°, � '� v ¢ �i' a�i v s � v `u �o o v w = a�i
N N N Z N Y . N � m � .6 N N m 'O L N O vl '� > O
N O � _ �
p,� N � � N O o p 'c w `° m z °� `° o � c.�7 � 'w � u � > �
o ' v N
�� g v ¢' w � � � `w @ � og .' o � E � ^' ° Om •'-° � '�^ ¢
>s ' n c .
\ W W N �^ O � Q N � L �y y �p � J y � 0 >Q OU m C Np� p
?_ a. N � a QY O1 N C U1 p
V N m � � C O�U� �C � � v+'i C j � a C > t6 � U/ "O C � • Q N m
V > > � p N l7 m ] rv .a y ,n N � y y > a m c o y u �
C C O � — Z � �^ N 'O � > "O C Q K v UJ N � �C
O O � � � t O � � � � � � � � � �e 71 � j � � C � �'� � `� W
N LL c a� y 2 m m m 2 �y O � m Q L � O � O m
c7 c7 N � m � m o =m � � v .v � E c'J .:vi 3 c � '� ,v, ' u
� m � w > «' c w -° 'c `° '° a � w ° c u E � � r o a � o �'
�° � N L m C ~ � C f0 � u C w�. � w �� � O � v�i ' C tn ?i .�+ � .
m � C7 t- > a �n n � u v � � � N a ;� c> > � � a N 3 � � � o y .
o .. .. .. .. o � � = ;,; v r � o � -o � « � � ': °' o �' c :o
� v v w w V` v �n � v � v v v 3 a m m � y w '� '� y w v �y y
a
� � m m m m c � z '! m o -o m rv o o c m v v � m � a v m a-f6o �
� m � c°� v v v w > v � a v r � w � �N E w � � 5 v > m > � > >
�+ o o � c c c c a c > v c . v c v w �° "' c v m c w ,,, o 'o w
ac z o 3 3 3 3 � 3 -°' N 3 3 m 3 0 �- ai �; 3 0 � � 3 0-�' v v o ? o
m � o0 0 0 0 0 o m o 0 o c o w o m �
» » >.> Y T-° �° °- v E '° Y E o° -° � � w
3 3 r r r r = r c L Q �' �' � • �' N �' � ia � t � ai
v w m v w v w `v v `w w w w � �, m w v a v `w °' m v -o
� ovoo0/q c anaa� av aac ;; aa � v � 'u o. aN nc :°_ v v ,n a
a -o 0 0 0 0 0 � o p o 0 0 „ o 0 0 �, v o o � o v � o 'a
o� o� u a` a` a` a` n a` l7 a` a` U in a` a` u m m v�'i a` a` Q c) a` c.�i � in ¢ o a` m
G
Z o m
� m � � .�c�m v�n �o �oo� o.�i� m'v�n�o�oo rn o.� i�
F �-1 .�-I '-I e-I .�-I .�-I e-I e-1 e4 a-I N N ry
� O
Z
� �
� �
p m m
_ N N
a r� rv
W o0
.�-I .�-I
rl rl
N N
m m
This Page Left Blank Intentionally
Resolution 11-75 December 13, 2011
Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION ORDERING CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN PROPOSED
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND AUTHORIZING ADVERTISING FOR BIDS
PROJECT NO. 12-02
RECONSTRUCTION OF HAROLD AVENUE AND RHODE ISLAND AVENUE NORTH
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Golden Valley, Minnesota, as follows:
1. That a public hearing held on this day at 7:00 pm, at the address of 7800 Golden
Valley Road in the City of Golden Valley, Minnesota, after notice of said hearing duly
published as required by law, this Council has consulted the view of all persons
interested, and, being fully advised of the pertinent facts, does hereby determine to
proceed with the construction of certain proposed public improvements for the said
City, in accordance with the description of said improvements contained in said
notice.
2. It is hereby found and determined that Public Improvements Project 12-02 is
feasible and can best be constructed as set forth in said report and not in
connection with some other improvements. (The Council reserves the right to
consolidate said improvements with other public improvements if it seems advisable
to do so.) It is further found that the improvements are effective and necessary.
3. The cost of said improvements shall be paid in part out of special assessment to be
levied as set forth in said notice of public hearing.
4. The City Engineer is hereby designated as engineer for the proposed public
improvements, and is hereby authorized, ordered and instructed to prepare final
plans and specifications for said improvements and obtain proposals for the same in
accordance with said report except as modified at the Public Hearing.
5. That the City Clerk shall prepare an Advertisement for Bids for making such
improvements. The advertisement shall be published as required by statute, shall
specify work to be done and shall state the time and place that the bids shall be
opened and considered by the City Engineer and City Clerk, and that no bids will be
considered unless sealed and filed with the Clerk.
Linda R. Loomis, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan M. Virnig, City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member
and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor
and her signature attested by the City Clerk.
Resolution 11-76 December 13, 2011
Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION RESTRICTING PARKING ON HAROLD AVENUE BETWEEN
WINNETKA AVENUE NORTH AND GLENWOOD AVENUE
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Golden Valley, Minnesota, as
fol lows
WHEREAS, the City Council has the power and authority, pursuant to Chapter 9.06,
subd. 2 of the City Code, to designate no parking zones and areas, and it appears that:
1. No parking shall be permitted on either side of Harold Avenue; except:
2. Parking shall be permitted on the south side between Louisiana Avenue North
and a point 620 feet west of Louisiana.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council for the City of Golden
Valley that parking shall be restricted on Harold Avenue between Winnetka Avenue North
and Glenwood Avenue.
Linda R. Loomis, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan M. Virnig, City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member
and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor
and her signature attested by the City Clerk.
�� ���
�����NN�������.
O � �� � (� Finance
i�a,_�,�, v 763-593-8013/763-593-8109 (fax)
Executive Summary For Action
Golden Valley Special City Council Meeting
December 13, 2011
Agenda Item
2. D. Public Hearing - Special Assessments - Harold Avenue and Rhode Island Avenue North
Street Reconstruction
Prepared By
Sue Virnig, Finance Director
Summary
The following resolution needs to be approved for the certification of special assessments for
the 2012 Harold Avenue and Rhode Island Avenue North street reconstruction area. All
property owners were sent the notice of hearing and assessment for consideration.
Attachments
Project Address List (1 page)
Resolution Adopting and Confirming Assessments for Various Public Improvements in the
2012 Pavement Management Area (2 pages)
Recommended Action
Motion to adopt Resolution Adopting and Confirming Assessments for Various Public
Improvements in the 2012 Pavement Management Area.
Pending Special Assessment Roll
CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY
2012 HAROLD AVENUE RECONSTRUCTION
CITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Deferred
PID Address Assessments Levied Total
3211821430079 6945 Glenwood Avenue 1,437.50 1,437.50
3211821420020 7025 Glenwood Avenue 1,437.50 1,437.50
3211821310017 7146 Harold Avenue 1,437.50 1,437.50
3211821310016 7156 Harold Avenue 1,437.50 1,437.50
3211821310003 7182 Harold Avenue 1,437.50 1,437.50
3211821310004 7200 Harold Avenue 1,437.50 1,437.50
3211821310005 7218 Harold Avenue 1,437.50 1,437.50
3211821310006 7236 Harold Avenue 1,437.50 1,437.50
3211821310018 7324 Harold Avenue 1,437.50 1,437.50
3211821310019 7330 Harold Avenue 1,437.50 1,437.50
3211821310008 7340 Harold Avenue 1,437.50 1,437.50
3211821310007 7420 Harold Avenue 1,437.50 1,437.50
3211821340007 7425 Harold Avenue 1,437.50 1,437.50
3211821310009 7430 Harold Avenue 1,437.50 1,437.50
3211821340006 7445 Harold Avenue 1,437.50 1,437.50
3211821340005 7465 Harold Avenue 1,437.50 1,437.50
3211821330051 7599 Harold Avenue 52,458.45 52,458.45
3211821310010 7600 Harold Avenue 7,937.80 7,937.80
3211821320001 7600 Harold Avenue 32,320.63 32,320.63
3211821320040 7644 Harold Avenue 3,593.75 3,593.75
3211821320015 7710 Harold Avenue 1,437,50 1,437.50
3211821320013 7724 Harold Avenue 1,437.50 1,437.50
3211821320012 7732 Harold Avenue 1,437.50 1,437.50 2,875.00
3211821320021 7830 Harold Avenue 1,437.50 1,437.50
3211821320020 7840 Harold Avenue 718.75 718.75
3211821340034 151 Louisiana Avenue North 61,978.47 61,978.47
3211821320035 401 Rhode Island Avenue North 3,593.75 3,593.75
3211821320039 408 Rhode Island Avenue North 5,750.00 5,750.00
3211821320034 409 Rhode Island Avenue North 5,750.00 5,750.00
3211821320014 411 Rhode Island Avenue North 5,750.00 5,750.00
3211821320033 413 Rhode Island Avenue North 5,750.00 5,750.00
3211821340008 7300 Ridgeway Road 718.75 718.75
3211821340002 7303 Ridgeway Road 718.75 718.75
Total 1,437.50 215,789.10 217,226.60
Resolution 11-77 December 13, 2011
Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION ADOPTING AND CONFIRMING ASSESSMENTS FOR
VARIOUS PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR STREETS IN THE
2012 HAROLD AVENUE AND RHODE ISLAND AVENUE NORTH AREA
1. The amount proper and necessary to be specially assessed at this time for
various publie improvements:
Pro"ect Years Interest Rate First Year Lev Total Assessed
2012 Harold Avenue 10 6% 2013 $215,789.10
and Rhode Island
Avenue North Area
Deferred Assessments $4,437.50
against every assessable lot, piece, or parcel of land affected thereby has been duly
calculated upon the basis of benefits, without regard to cash valuation, in accordance with
the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and notice has been duly published, as
required by law that this Council would meet to hear, consider and pass upon all objections,
if any, and said proposed assessment has at all time since its filing been open for public
inspection and an opportunity has been given to all interested persons to present their
objections if any, to such proposed assessments.
2. This Council, having heard and considered all objections so presented, finds that
each of the lots, pieces and parcels of land enumerated in the proposed assessment was
and is specially benefited by the construction of said improvement in not less than the
amount of the assessment set opposite the description of each such lot, piece and parcel
of land respectively, and such amount so set out is hereby levied against each of the
respective lots, pieces and parcels of land therein described.
3. The proposed assessments are hereby adopted and confirmed as the proper
assessments for each of said lots, pieces and parcels of land respectively, and the
assessment against each parcel, together with interest at the rate of six (6) percent per
annum accruing on the full amount thereof unpaid, shall be a lien concurrent with general
taxes upon parcel and all thereof. The total amount of each such assessment not prepaid
shall be payable in equal annual principal installments extending over a period of years, as
indicated in each case. The first of said installments, together with interest on the entire
assessment for the period of January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2013, will be payable
with general taxes for the year of 2012, collectible in 2013, and one of each of the
remaining installments, together with one year's interest on that and all other unpaid
installments, will be paid with general taxes for each consecutive year thereafter until the
entire assessment is paid.
Resolution 11-77 - Continued December 13, 2011
4. Prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, the owner of any
lot, piece or parcel of land assessed hereby may at any time pay the whole such
assessment, with interest to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer, but no interest
shall be charged if such payment is made by November 18, 2012.
5. The City Clerk shall, as soon as may be, prepare and transmit to the County
Auditor a certified duplicate of the assessment roll, with each installment and interest on
each unpaid assessment set forth separately, to be extended upon the proper tax lists of
the County and the County Auditor shall thereafter collect said assessment in the manner
provided by law.
Linda R. Loomis, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan M. Virnig, City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member
and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor
and her signature attested by the City Clerk.