06-17-14 CC Agenda Packet (entire packet) AGENDA
Regular Meeting
of the
City Council
Golden Valley City Hall
7800 Golden Valley Road
Council Chamber
June 17, 2014
6:30 pm
The Council may consider item numbers 1, 2, 3, 5 and 6
prior to the public hearings scheduled at 7 pm
1. CALL TO ORDER PAGES
A. Roll Call
B. Pledge of Allegiance
C. Oath of Office for Police Officers 3
D. Receipt of Community Partnership Grant from CenterPoint Energy 4
E. Recognition of Top Golden Valley Steppers - 2014 Step To It Challenge 5
F. Presentation of Certificate of Recognition: Mr. Marshall Tanick 6
2. ADDITIONS AND CORRECTIONS TO AGENDA
3. CONSENT AGENDA
Approval of Consent Agenda -All items listed under this heading are considered to be
routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no
discussion of these items unless a Council Member or citizen so requests in which
event the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered in its
normal sequence on the agenda.
A. Approval of Minutes - City Council Meeting June 6, 2014 7-10
B. Approval of Check Register
1. City 11
2. Housing and Redevelopment Authority 12
C. Licenses:
1. Solicitor's License - True Protection 13-15
2. Solicitor's License - Kent Allen on behalf of Greater Midwest Realty 16-18
D. Minutes of Boards and Commissions:
1. Human Services Fund - May 12, 2014 19-20
2. Joint Water Commission - May 5, 2014 21-22
3. Joint Planning Commission, Environmental Commission and Open Space and 23-30
Recreation Commission - May 15, 2014
E. Board/Commission Appointments 31
F. Authorization to Sign School Resource Officer Agreement with Intermediate School
District 281 32-35
G. Resolution of Appointment of Absentee Ballot Board Election Judges for the Primary
Election 14-50 36-38
H. Approval of Requests for Beer and/or Wine Brookview Park 39-40
I. Resolution of Approval Neighborhood Meeting Policy - Planning Division 14-51 41-43
J. Resolution Authorization to Sign the Joint Cooperation Agreement with Hennepin
County for Participation in Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block
Program 14-52 44-54
K. Resolution to Establish Permanent No Parking Zones on Florida Avenue North 14-53 55-58
4. PUBLIC HEARINGS 7 PM
A. Public Hearing - Ordinance #518 - Final Design Plan Approval - Morrie's Golden
Valley PUD #115 - Morrie's Automotive Group, Applicant 59-98
5. OLD BUSINESS
6. NEW BUSINESS
A. On-Sale, Sunday Sale Liquor License Renewals 99
B. Bottineau Transitway Update 100
C. Announcements of Meetings
D. Mayor and Council Communications
7. ADJOURNMENT
city 0
I!' 'Ar
golden MEMORANDUM
valley Police Department
763-593-8079/763-593-8098(fax)
Executive Summary For Action
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
June 17, 2014
Agenda Item
1. C. Administration of Police Officer Oath of Office-Cory Proctor and Christopher White
Prepared By
Stacy Carlson, Chief of Police
Summary
Officer Cory Proctor and Officer Christopher White will be present to take the oath of office as
Golden Valley police officers.
Recommended Action
Mayor Pro Tem Clausen to administer the oath of office to Officer Cory Proctor and Officer
Christopher White.
city o
golden MEMORANDUM
valley Fire Department
763-593-8079/763-593-8098(fax)
Executive Summary For Action
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
June 17, 2014
Agenda Item
1. D. Receipt of Community Partnership Grant from CenterPoint Energy
Prepared By
John Crelly, Fire Chief
Summary
The Golden Valley Fire Department made application for, and was awarded a $1,200 Community
Partnership Grant offered by CenterPoint Energy. The grant will be used toward the purchase of
two Automatic External Defibrillators (AED). A representative from CenterPoint Energy will be at
the meeting to present the grant.
Recommended Action
Motion to accept donation from CenterPoint Community Partnership Grant.
city 0 f
golden MEMORANDUM
valley Park and Recreation Department
763-512-2345/763-512-2344(fax)
Executive Summary For Action
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
June 17, 2014
Agenda Item
1. E. Recognition of Top Golden Valley Steppers - 2014 Step To It Challenge
Prepared By
Sandy Werts, Volunteer Coordinator
Summary:
The Step To It Challenge is a fun, light-hearted way to connect with family, friends and neighbors
and to get moving again after a long winter. Twenty-four communities completed to see which
one has the most active residents. Participants from each city will be honored by Hennepin
County and the Minnesota Twins at a Twins home game during the 2014 season.
Step To It participants keep an ongoing total number of the steps daily. By using an activity
conversion chart activities such as biking, skate boarding,Tai Chi, lawn mowing and more can
count toward overall steps.
The City of Golden Valley had 212 people who live or work in the city participate in the challenge.
Golden Valley placed fourth among the communities for over all steps at 37,548,831 steps,
behind Brooklyn Park, Plymouth and Brooklyn Center- all much larger cities. The top five
steppers were:
1. Robin Hanscom 1,085,227 steps
2. Ethan Kehrberg 812,668 steps
3. Roger McCabe 667,331 steps
4. Mickie Weaver 652,170 steps
5. Tim Teynor 617,287 steps
Recommended Action
The City Council to recognize the top five Step To It participants for the City of Golden Valley.
city o f
golden MEMORANDUM
valley City Administration/Council
763-593-8003/763-593-8109(fax)
. . ..
Executive Summary For Action
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
June 17, 2014
Agenda Item
1. F. Presentation of Certificate of Recognition - Mr. Marshall Tanick
Prepared By
Thomas Burt, City Manager
Summary
The City Council would like to acknowledge and recognize Mr. Tanick for his work on the Beyond
the Yellow Ribbon Quad Cities project.
Recommended Action
Mayor Pro Tem to present certificate of recognition to Mr. Tanick.
tv o I�w -
. t C UNOFFICIAL MINUTES
el V CITY COUNCIL MEETING
'' GOLDEN VALLEY, MINNESOTA
JUNE 3, 2014
1. CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Harris called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m.
1A. Roll Call
Present: Mayor Harris, Council Members Clausen, Fonnest, Harris, Schmidgall and Snope.
1 B. Pledge of Allegiance
1 C. Video Presentation of ew Playground Equipment Brookview Park and Lions Park -
Junior Girl Scout Troop 17811
Mayor Harris introduced the Junior Girl Scout Troop 17811 and presented a certificate of
recognition to the Troop.
1 D. Presentation of Certificate of Recognition - Ms. Lynn Gitelis for her service on the
Beyond the Yellow Ribbon Quad Cities campaign.
Mayor Harris presented the certificate of recognition to Ms. Gitelis and thanked her for her
service.
1 E. Board/Commission Oath of Office and Presentation of Certificate of Appointment.
Mayor Harris administered the oath of office and presented a certificate of appointment, city
mug and pin to: Mr. Michael Herring of the Human Services Fund.
2. ADDITIONS AND CORRECTIONS TO AGENDA
MOTION made by Council Member Snope, seconded by Council Member Clausen to
approve the agenda of June 3, 2014 as revised: addition of item 3H-Authorize Sale of 2241
Legend Drive and the motion carried unanimously.
3. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA
MOTION made by Council Member Snope, seconded by Council Member Clausen to
approve the consent agenda of June 3, 2014 as revised to remove items: 3D1-Award
Contract for 2014 Asphalt Overlay Project, 3D2-Award Contract for Yosemite Avenue
Watermain Replacement Project and 3H-Authorize Sale of 2241 Legend Drive and the
motion carried unanimously.
3A. Approve Minutes of City Council Workshop Meeting April 26, 2014 and City Council
Meeting May 20, 2014.
3B. Approve city check register and authorize the payments of the bills as submitted.
3C. Accept for filing the Minutes of Boards and Commissions as follows:
Planning Commission - April 28, 2014
Board of Zoning Appeals - March 25, 2014
Human Rights Commission - April 22, 2014
Joint Water Commission -April 2, 2014
Unofficial City Council Minutes -2- June 3, 2014
3. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA-Continued
3D3. Approve purchase of one vehicle maintenance hoist from Rotary Lift in the amount
of, including freight, $85,198.70 and the installation of one vehicle maintenance hoist
from Lube-Tech in the amount of$28,550.
3D4. Authorize purchase of hydrants from the lowest quote received from Dakota Supply
Group, Sioux Falls, South Dakota, in the amount of$27,990.
3E. Approve the requests for beer and/or wine at Brookview Park as recommended by
staff.
3F. Adopt Resolution 14-47 for Approval of Plat - Fretham 21 st Addition.
3G. Adopt Resolution 14-48 authorizing a Minnesota Department of Transportation
Municipal Agreement Program submittal for improvements at Country Club
Drive/Douglas Drive (CSAH 102) and Trunk Highway 55.
3H Approve saleof2-24T1 CegeRd DT'f
4V.
3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA
3D1. Award contract for 2014 Asphalt Overlay Project.
Council Member Fonnest requested staff to provide additional information regarding the
budgeting and bidding process. Director of Public Works Clancy gave an overview of the
process and answered questions for the Council.
MOTION made by Council Member Fonnest, seconded by Council Member Clausen to
award a contract for the 2014 Asphalt Overlay Project to the lowest responsible bidder,
Northwest Asphalt, Inc., for the Base Bid and Alternate Bids 1 and 2, in the amount of
$947,547.70 and the motion carried unanimously.
3D2. Award contracts for 2014 Yosemite Avenue Watermain Replacement Project.
Mayor Harris requested staff provide additional information regarding the budget and the
location of the project. Director of Public Works Clancy gave an overview of the budget and
project location and answered questions from the Council. City Engineer Oliver answered
further questions regarding the project from the Council.
MOTION made by Council Member Clausen, seconded by Council Member Fonnest to
Award contracts to RPU, Inc. and Interstate Companies to complete the 2014 Yosemite
Avenue Watermain Replacement Project in the amounts of$19,880.00 and $85,145.50;
respectively and the motion carried unanimously.
3H. Authorize Sale of 2241 Legend Drive.
Council Member Schmidgall requested staff provide additional information on the reason
the City was ordered to purchase the property. City Attorney Barnard provided additional
information on the city purchase of the property.
Mayor Harris requested staff provide an update to the neighborhood regarding the sale of
the property.
MOTION made by Council Member Snope, seconded by Council Member Clausen to
Approve Purchase Agreement and Sale of 2241 Legend Drive in the amount of $150,000
and Authorize the City Manager to Sign the Agreement subject to reference checks and the
motion carried unanimously.
Unofficial City Council Minutes -3- June 3, 2014
4. PUBLIC HEARING
4A. Public Hearing - 2013 National Pollution and Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) Phase II - Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan, Annual Report to
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. Resolution 14-49
Water Resources Engineer Fox presented the staff report and answered questions from the
Council. City Engineer Oliver answered questions from the Council.
Mayor Harris opened the public hearing.
Mr. Christopher Gise, Island Drive, came forth to thank the City for the good experience he
had regarding communicate during the dredging of two ponds in his neighborhood.
Mayor Harris closed the public hearing.
MOTION made by Council Member Schmidgall, seconded by Council Member Snope to
adopt Resolution 14-49 Issuing a Negative Declaration of Need for Revisions to the Storm
Water Pollution Prevention Program and the motion carried unanimously.
6. NEW BUSINESS
6A. Approve On-Sale and Sunday Sale Liquor License Renewals
Sergeant Roberts introduced the staff report.
MOTION made by Council Member Schmidgall, seconded by Council Member Snope to
approve the renewal of the respective liquor licenses for the applicants listed below for the
2014-2015 license term and the motion carried unanimously.
On-Sale and Sunday Sale
Osaka Golden Valley Inc. d/b/a Osaka Sushi and Hibachi
Chipotle Mexican Grill/Colorado LLC d/b/a Chipotle Mexican Grill
RWB Minneapolis Catering LLC d/b/a Harvest Cafe
6H. Announcements of Meetings.
A Special Council/Manager Meeting will be held on June 4, 2014 at 5 pm.
A Concert in the Park featuring the Golden Valley Orchestra will be held on June 9, 2014 at
7 pm at Brookview Park.
The next Council/Manager Meeting will be held on June 10, 2014 at 6:30 pm.
The Police and Fire in the Parks event will be held on June 11, 2014 at 3 pm at Lions Park.
The Fire Fighter Recruitment Expo will be held on June 12, 2014 from 6 pm to 10 pm at
Fire Station 1.
The Boards and Commissions Recognition Dinner will be held on June 12, 2014 at 6:30 pm
at Brookview Community Center.
The Views of the Valley Photo contest deadline is June 13, 2014 at 4:30 pm.
Unofficial City Council Minutes -4- June 3, 2014
6H. Announcements of Meetings — continued
The Golden Valley Bridge Builder will hold their quarterly event on June 13, 2014 from 10
am to noon at the Golden Valley Historical Society.
The Ceremony for the Quad Cities Beyond the Yellow Ribbon will be held on June 15, 2014
at 10:30 am at the Crystal Airport.
A Concert in the Park featuring Ageless will be held on June 16, 2014 at 7 pm at Brookview
Park.
61. Mayor and Council Communications.
Mayor Harris gave an update on the resolution for the 911 County Dispatch agreement and
stated a meeting will be held on June 10, 2014 at 1:30 pm at Hennepin County.
Mayor Harris requested Ms. Clancy to provide information on the road construction in down
town Golden Valley in reference to the CenterPoint Energy Pipeline Integrity Project. Ms.
Clancy provided the road construction information.
Mayor Harris thanked the Golden Valley Police Department for their efforts in a local case's
investigation.
Council Member Fonnest gave an up-date on the PRISM event which was held on May 29,
2014.
Adiournment
MOTION made by Council Member Schmidgall, seconded by Council Member Snope and
the motion carried unanimously to adjourn the meeting at 8:11 pm.
Shepard M. Harris, Mayor
ATTEST:
Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk
city 0
goldenl*-vv�, r
valley Finance Department
763-593-8013(763-593-8109(fax)
Executive Summary For Action
Golden Valley city council Meeting
June 17, 2014
Agenda Item
3. B. 1. Approval of City Check Register
Prepared By
Sue Virnig, Finance Director
Summary
Approval of the check register for various vendor claims against the City of Golden Valley.
Attachments
• Document sent via email
Recommended Action
Motion to authorize the payment of the bills as submitted.
city )f
10
Finance Depgotaen -,� MEMORANDUM
artment
artment valley r
763-593-8013/763-593-8109(fax)
Executive Summary For Action
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
June 17, 2014
Agenda Item
3. B. 2. Approval of Housing and Redevelopment Authority Check Register
Prepared By
Sue Virnig, Finance Director
Summary
Approval of the check register for various vendor claims against the Housing and Redevelopment
Authority.
Attachments
• Document sent via email
Recommended Action
Motion to authorize the payment of the bills as submitted.
city o
golden MEMORANDUM
valley City Administration/Council
763-593-3991 /763-593-8109(fax)
Executive Summary For Action
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
June 171 2014
Agenda Item
3. C. 1. Solicitor's License-True Protection
Prepared By
Judy Nally, Administrative Assistant
Summary
As per City Code, any individual or group intending to go door-to-door within the City selling
products, taking orders or soliciting for business or donations must be licensed by the City to do
SO.
Attachments
• Peddler/Solicitor License Application (2 pages)
Recommended Action
Motion to approve the solicitor's license for True Protection.
Application and fee must be submitted to the City Manager's Office the Wednesday prior to
the City Council Meeting. Council Meetings are normally held the first and third Tuesday of
each month.
PEDDLER/SOLICITOR LICENSE APPLICATIO
TO: Golden Valley City Council Fee Paid: $
7800 Golden Valley Road Number of Persons: / Y3
Golden Valley, MN 55427 Type of License: Peddler
(circle one)
Enclose the sum of$ a for /8 (number) peddlers/solicitors as required by
City Code of the City of Golden Valley and have complied with all the requirements of said
Codenecessaryfor obtaining this license.
(Business or Individual Name or Organization to be Licensed)
x ,579 1`1 A-5 ' X-} C1
MN Business ID Federal Business ID (FEIN)
Define Business
LIMITt-lt, Lr}$1LlTy CbM�F}N�-!
(Corporation, Proprietorship, Partnership, Non-Profit, State of Incorporation or Individual)
15300 S` - 14.,E #3a.olo
(Address)
Piumm,t M , MO 55uc4(o
City, State and Zip Code)
r,�► - yid - �c��-cn
(Telephone Number, including Area Code)
NOW, THEREFORE, (-(�C G ���)C�� hereby makes application for
(Applicant Name)
period of _through 12/31/J�, subject to the conditions and provisions of sairl
City Code.
( na ure of Applicant/Principal Officer)
Description of goods or services for sale (include prices) or indicate if soliciting donations.
If more space is needed, attach additional sheets (be specific):
wn&te ',E L',l A t 7N _E%QU t Pw C&yr CNRRG E _ IL
wG ps�rlV�t'r�orJ FEG _ $°!`jam f�1G Flon+ ►� u�aNtTr�x�N� Rin = ��-tQl.9`
NOTE: If the products for sale are changed or modified, you must give the City complete
information regarding such change or modification.
List the names and addresses of EACH person who will be peddling or soliciting on behalf
of said organization in the City, or, in the alternative, the name, address and telephone
number or numbers where a responsible person of said organization will maintain a list of
names and addresses of all persons engaged in peddling or soliciting in the City:
_, --- -
(If more space is needed, attach additional sheets)
STATE OF m INNr-$oj-r+ )
)ss.
COUNTY OF f-f-A)WI V)
(Officer/Individual) (Name of Organization)
being first duly sworn, depose and say that all the foregoing information is true to his/her
own knowledge except as to matters therein stated on information and belief, and as to
such matters, he/she believes them to be true.
Signature of Applicant/Principal Officer)
Subscribed and sworn to before me this
day of , 201 _
(�57t&'L
Lx` JUDITH A. NALLY
(Signature) NOTARY pUBM. gOTA "
;; My &PiW j.s+.zoos
city 0 golden!-ir MEMORANDUM
',y City Administration/Council
763-593-3991 /763-593-8109(fax)
Executive Summary For Action
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
June 17, 2014
Agenda Item
3. C. 2. Solicitor's License- Kent Allen on behalf of Greater Midwest Realty
Prepared By
Judy Nally, Administrative Assistant
Summary
As per City Code, any individual or group intending to go door-to-door within the City selling
products, taking orders or soliciting for business or donations must be licensed by the City to do
SO.
Attachments
Peddler/Solicitor License Application (2 pages)
Recommended Action
Motion to approve the solicitor's license for Kent Allen on behalf of Greater Midwest Realty.
Application and fee must be submitted to the City Manager's Office the Wednesday prior to
the City Council Meeting. Council Meetings are normally held the first and third Tuesday of
each month.
PEDDLER/SOLICITOR LICENSE APPLICATION
TO: Golden Valley City Council Fee Paid: $ 3o
7800 Golden Valley Road Number of Persons: ON
Golden Valley, MN 55427 Type of License: Peddler Solicitor
(circle one
Enclose the sum of$ for (number) peddlers/solicitors as required by
City Code of the City of Golden Valley and have complied with all the requirements of said
Code necessary for obtaining this license.
C. :rA,r-A L til.lfiw r &A=;t -- L&Lrr k_� V, flog n—
(Business or Individual Name or Organization to be Licensed)
(MN Business ID or FEIN (Federal ID) for Business Licenses)
Define Business ,
(Corporation, Proprietorship, Partne ship, Non-Profit, State of Incorporation or Individual)
35-15- I&L-L--1 12t *330
(Address)
City, State and Zip Code)
& r�--a.�j -a r,
(Telephone Number, including Area Code)
NOW, THEREFORE, l< <.� hereby makes application for
(Applicant Name)
period of ` t through 12/31/, subject to the conditions and provisions of said
City Code.
(Signature of Applicant/Principal Officer)
Description of goods or services for sale (include prices) or indicate if soliciting donations.
If more space is needed, attach additional sheets (be specific):
"owe 4 L. ,/L�� t,c t_ Sz Ate' t-�
NOTE: If the products for sale are changed or modified, you must give the City complete
information regarding such change or modification.
List the names and addresses of EACH person who will be peddling or soliciting on behalf
of said organization in the City, or, in the alternative, the name, address and telephone
number or numbers where a responsible person of said organization will maintain a list of
names and addresses of all persons engaged in peddling or soliciting in the City:
(If more space is needed, attach additional sheets)
STATE OF m1VMt�Ot� )
COUNTY OF Rf V I'V IN � ss.
I, VAA\7-- A(,-C- F� of �VlZi-
(Officer/Individual) (Name of Organization)
being first duly sworn, depose and say that all the foregoing information is true to his/her
own knowledge except as to matters therein stated on information and belief, and as to
such matters, he/she believes them to be true.
Signature of Applicant/Principal Officer)
Subscribed and sworn to before me this
V/\ 01
day of , 20 1
C1
(Signature)
MOM -
-wwwrwtMnN►n
JUDITH A. NALLY
NOTARY KMM-MMMMTA
My 0WMW n E*W JWL 51,2015
y
Golden Valley Human Services Fund (GVHSF) Meeting
Minutes
May 12, 2014
Present: Kathryn Frommer, Alan Ingber, Carolyn Kaehr, Craig McDaniels, Connie Sandler,
Peggy Watkins, Toots Vodovoz and Andrew Wold. Also present: Jeanne Fackler, Staff
Liaison.
Not Attending: Hilmer Erickson, Elissa Heilicher,
Call to Order: Sandler called the meeting to order at 6:47 p.m.
Agenda Changes or Additions: No additions or changes to the agenda.
April 7 minutes: Vodovoz moved and Kaehr seconded the motion to approve the minutes
from April 7. The motion passed unanimously.
Election of Chair/Vice-Chair: Sandler made the motion to elect Andrew Wold as Chair
and Kathryn Frommer as Vice Chair by acclamation. Motion passed unanimously.
Run the Valley:
Fackler reported that 455 runners and walkers participated in Run the Valley. To date
$15,320 has been raised. Expenses were $4,533. Net is $10,786. Commission members
thought the event was successful despite the cool weather and short training season. Kid's
Fun Run had 24 participants. Members liked the packets of t-shirts/race numbers and felt it
sped up the race day pick-up process. Sandler thanked the Commission members for their
work on the event.
The 2015 date was discussed. Passover is April 4-11 and Easter is April 5. The date was
set for Saturday, April 11. Fackler will inform city staff and the timing company.
Upcoming Events
July 11th — Golf Classic. Letters to last year's sponsors are ready to be sent. Sandler
encouraged members to talk up the tournament since Allianz will not be a sponsor this
year. Wold will ask Clements if LIVE will promote the event.
Other Business:
Solicitation Letter As of today, $10,154 has been received.
Board and Commission Dinner. The annual Board and Commission Dinner is scheduled
for Thursday, June 12 at Brookview. Invitations are being mailed to current and retiring
members.
Application packet: The application packet was distributed to members. Sandler asked the
members to review the packet and bring suggestions/changes to the next meeting.
Sandler reminded the members that the next meeting is scheduled for Monday, June 9.
Adjournment: Ingber moved to adjourn the meeting, Vodovoz seconded the motion. The
meeting was adjourned at 7:30 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Connie Sandler, GVHSF Chair Jeanne Fackler, Staff Liaison
JOINT WATER COMMISSION MINUTES
Golden Valley - Crystal - New Hope
Meeting of May 7, 2014
The Golden Valley— Crystal — New Hope Joint Water Commission meeting was called to
order at 1:39 p.m. in the City of Golden Valley Council Conference Room.
Commissioners Present
Tom Burt, City Manager, Golden Valley
Kirk McDonald, City Manager, New Hope
Anne Norris, City Manager, Crystal
Staff Present
Tom Mathisen, City Engineer, Crystal
Randy Kloepper, Utilities Superintendent, Crystal
Bernie Weber, Operations Manager, New Hope
Sue Virnig, Finance Director, Golden Valley
Bert Tracy, Public Works Maintenance Supervisor
Kelley Janes, Utilities Supervisor, Golden Valley
Mitch Hoeft, Utilities Engineer, Golden Valley
Pat Schutrop, Administrative Assistant, Golden Valley
Others Present
Steve Nelson, Bolton & Menk, Inc.
Minutes of April 2, 2014 Meeting
MOVED by McDonald and seconded by Norris to approve the minutes of the April 2, 2014
meeting as presented. Motion carried.
Update on Emergency Backup Water Supply Proiect
The advertisement for bids is ready and will be submitted for publication on May 15, 2014.
Yellow card approvals were received from the Minnesota Department of Natural
Resources. Worksheets were submitted to the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) and
the only remaining task is to schedule site visits. The surveys are completed.
The Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board (MPRB) submitted a draft easement
agreement and a draft letter of understanding. Hoeft will forward the documents to the TAC
members and to Golden Valley City Attorney Allen Barnard to review. He will continue to
work with the MPRB in finalizing the documents. Nelson said the well drilling will not begin
until the easement and letter of understanding are finalized. The bid documents will include
that contingency.
Well construction for the Golden Valley well must be scheduled after September 2014. The
Crystal generator needs to be up and running and the York Pit reconnection work must be
completed before work can start on the Golden Valley site. If all three wells are drilled
simultaneously, well construction could be completed by the end of December 2014.
Nelson said there could potentially be two additional bid packages for JWC approval
regarding the New Hope well improvements; one for watermain work and one for the
chlorine feed equipment.
Joint Water Commission
May 7,2014
Page 2 of 2
The bid opening for the wells project is scheduled for 11 am, Wednesday, May 28, in the
City of Golden Valley Council Chambers. The TAC will request project award from the JWC
at the June 4 meeting.
MOVED by Norris and seconded by McDonald to authorize advertisement for bids for the
JWC Emergency Supply Wells Project. Motion carried.
Update on County Road 9 Project
The weather has delayed the project a couple of weeks. The contractor started removing
structures on County Road 9. The original reconnection date of the pipe to the Crystal
reservoir was scheduled for May 23, but will now be delayed.
Crystal tested the backfill pipe to its generator and it tested out well. Mathisen said the idea
is to keep the reservoir full at all times.
Update on Crystal Pump Station Generator Proiect
The slab for the new generator has been placed. The delivery date for the generator was
delayed to June 20. All preparation for the generator installation will be completed before
the generator is delivered. Mathisen estimated it will take about a week after delivery to
have the generator up and running.
Other Business
None.
Next Meeting
The next meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, June 4, 2014, at 1:30 p.m.
Adjournment
Chair Burt adjourned the meeting at 1:55 p.m.
Thomas D. Burt, Chair
ATTEST:
Pat Schutrop, Recording Secretary
Joint Meeting of the Planning Commission, Environmental Commission and Open
Space and Recreation Commission
May 15, 2014
A joint meeting of the Planning Commission, Environmental Commission and Open
Space and Recreation Commission was held at the Golden Valley City Hall, Council
Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota, on Thursday, May 15,
2014, Planning Commission Chair Kluchka called the meeting to order at 7 pm.
Those present were Planning Commissioners Baker, Kluchka, Segelbaum and
Waldhauser, Environmental Commissioner Tonia Galonska, Open Space and Recreation
Commissioners Cornelius, Kuebelbeck, Mattison, Rosenquist, Sandler and Steinberg.
Also present were Community Development Director Mark Grimes, City Planner Jason
Zimmerman, Public Works Specialist Eric Eckman and Administrative Assistant Lisa
Wittman.
1. Accept public comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
for the proposed Bottineau Transitway
Zimmerman briefly discussed the project development timeline, the milestones achieved,
and the project goals.
Kluchka opened the public hearing.
Sean Fahey, 3941 Bassett Creek Drive, said that the DEIS shows that Golden Valley is
not going to get any open space or environmental benefit. If anything, there is going to be
increased traffic and reduced air quality. He said there may be development opportunities
but from an environmental standpoint that just means there will be environmental
degradation and wetland filling according to chapters five and six in the DEIS. He said the
City should try to fight for mitigations as much as possible and use municipal consent as a
way to get mitigations needed for sound and light. He said the City shouldn't be afraid to
use municipal consent as a tool to make this project as beneficial as possible to Golden
Valley.
Christophe Wall-Romana, 2912 Kyle Avenue North, said he is a daily bus user and is
strongly against the Bottineau LRT proposed alignment. He said the DEIS asks Golden
Valley to sacrifice its environmental and recreational assets for an LRT project that will
benefit the City very little and will serve mostly other communities further north. He said
only 2.5% of the population will use the LRT and will meanwhile damage forever the
peace and quality of life of all. It will also affect the beauty of two parks as well as
Theodore Wirth which thousands of people from Golden Valley use. He said the project is
expedient rather than respectful of people's lives. He said the LRT alignment completely
bypasses North Minneapolis which is a big problem because they are the densest users
of mass transit, with the lowest income and lowest car ownership in all of the Twin Cities
area. He said the D2 option along Penn Avenue is the only other given option which the
DEIS invalidates in the name of environmental justice, rightly so and D2 is a bad
alignment, but other alignments should be considered. Time and money should not
pressure the City into accepting a flawed alignment. He asked the Commissioners to
Joint Meeting of the Planning Commission, Environmental Commission and Open
Space and Recreation Commission
May 15, 2014
Page 2
preserve the natural environment in the City's recreational facilities and more importantly
preserve the right of all present and future Golden Valley residents to enjoy these fragile
resources by keeping the precious wetlands and beautiful landscape intact.
Madge Thorsen, 2811 June Avenue North, said the draft EIS is legally inadequate in a
number of ways. It doesn't analyze whether Mary Hills and Sochacki are being
constructively used by the project within the meaning of Section 4F of the Federal
Transportation Act when noise and vibration and defoliation and deforestation impacts
essentially rob parks of their essence, that is a use, and a whole lot of things follow from
that in terms of what needs to occur next if the parks are being used. Yet, the draft EIS is
silent as to these two parks and that part of the required analysis. The same is true with
respect to temporary occupancy. She said the DEIS recites in chapter four that the project
is consistent with Comprehensive Plan of Golden Valley and Robbinsdale, but it doesn't
mention the park sections of those plans. Chapter six in Golden Valley's plan says Mary
Hills is a natural preserve for visual aesthetics and buffering, for walking and for passive
recreational uses. Those appear to be inconsistent with shooting 82 decibels of linear
noise down the tracks every 7 minutes, but you wouldn't even know that because that
analysis is not provided, the facts are not there on which to base a decision. She said she
also thinks the DEIS also underestimates the cost of the D1 alignment because it does
not analyze inverse condemnation damages. A government can take property, not just by
grabbing it, but by creating effects that diminish market values. She suggested the
Commissioners talk to the Metropolitan Airport Commission who has been in noise
litigation for 20, 30, 40 years. If the costs are understated they can't be compared to the
D2 or any other alignment and the comparison of options are deprived which is a core
flaw in the analysis of the EIS document. So Golden Valley as stewards of public land
really needs to make some serious comments about this draft EIS.
Joanie Clausen, 2516 Lee Avenue North, said she received an email from a resident that
she would like put on record. She has been told that there will fencing around the
Bottineau line and she is concerned that would make it hard for animals and residents to
go back and forth. The residents in the area near St. Margaret Mary would not be able to
use the nature area in the same manner. She is also concerned about noise and said a
sound wall with natural trees and bushes would be best or a temporary sound wall should
be installed until trees mature.
Brad Thorson, 2811 June Avenue North said he needs to see some renderings of what
this is going to look like. If you look at the environmental impacts in the DEIS they are
moving the rail line, they are adding two other lines, they are putting up a sound barrier or
possible fence, he has no idea what this will look like. He said some renderings have
been done for the station in the Wirth area but there is nothing at all for the public to see
as to what sort of impact that will have and how it will change the way the park can be
used.
Nils Berg, 2440 Dresden Lane, said it seems like the materials are month too late or this
meeting is a month too early to be productive and it feels as though this whole venture
Joint Meeting of the Planning Commission, Environmental Commission and Open
Space and Recreation Commission
May 15, 2014
Page 3
has a quick shuffle. He said he finds it interesting that the Bottineau preferred alternative
was selected because the planners didn't want to displace either 72 or 175 families in
North Minneapolis both of which the LRT representatives have said. He said that's a
noble thought even if it is more than a tad disingenuous. In reality, the LRT is all about
social engineering. It goes beyond social planning it is about telling people where they
have to live. Retrofitting trains through valued neighborhoods is all about community
disruption and displacement and to think of it as anything else is an exercise in deception
and illusion. He said the DEIS document has an extensive section on water management
and that's a good thing. Water flow going in and out of Rice Lake is a major concern for
those who live in the area. He said Robbinsdale plugged up the flow under the BNSF
tracks a number of years ago and as a result they experienced significant flooding in both
Mary Hills Park and in their back yards. The water flow was so strong that they could
literally white water raft in their yards. When Robbinsdale put in the new drainage culverts
the matter was resolved and to this day those who live south of that area remain
interested in any water tampering that's occurring upstream. He asked what is in it for
freight. Reports about train delays, accidents and oil movement seem to appear on a
frequent basis in the Star Tribune. He said it makes him think that if he was Burlington
Northern Rail and he had trains backed up he would be interested in gaining shipping
capacity. If you won't or can't give that to them, why would they be interested in sitting
across the table from them and if he was the Golden Valley City Council, he wouldn't
want to have to go back to his constituents and tell them that he had been successful in
getting the railroad to bring longer, heavier and possibly oil laden trains through their
neighborhood. He said his real concern is that he sees nothing in the DEIS addressing
the fact that Mary Hills Nature Center and Sochacki Park are both sitting on a landfill. The
landfill area is the final resting place for old Highway 100. The various paths in the parks
have concrete slabs that can readily be seen are the remnants of the old roadway. The
thing of interest about that is much of Highway 100 was built as a post-depression
Department of Public Works project in the 1930s. Back then, before people knew any
better, asbestos was commonly used in many forms of construction including highways.
Asbestos fibers bonded to and strengthened the cement. It was not affected by
temperature changes and helped provide protection from salt damage to the roadways.
He said he doesn't know if there is actually any asbestos present in the concrete and from
what he can tell neither does the DEIS document because it doesn't mention it. He said
he does know that a variety of respiratory ailments can be directly traced to asbestos.
According to the Mesothelioma website exposure over time can have dire consequences.
An article he read states that an unbroken block of cement presents no danger, but any
time it is cracked or broken, microscopic bits of asbestos are released. Once airborne
they can be breathed in by an unsuspecting victim who discovers years later that the
material has lodged in their respiratory system. The article states that people can still be
exposed to asbestos if they come across broken chunks of cement that contain the
hazardous material. He said he doesn't bring this up to instill fear but to encourage
caution. He said light rail does not exist in its own little vacuum you need to look at the
whole picture. The City Council does not live in a vacuum either and needs to be acutely
aware of how moving heavy freight more deeply into Mary Hills could negatively impact
Joint Meeting of the Planning Commission, Environmental Commission and Open
Space and Recreation Commission
May 15, 2014
Page 4
the health and welfare of City residents. Anything that causes ground vibration could
disturb materials that need to be kept dormant.
Margaret Wall-Ramano, 2912 Kyle Avenue North, said she is concerned about the noise
that will come with this project and how it will impact the D1 neighborhood. She said a
deeply felt imperative and core pleasure of every Minnesotan is to be outdoors as much
as possible once winter is gone. A lot of recreational activities take place not necessarily
at parks, but at home in front and back yards and on porches, stoops and balconies.
Soaking up the warmth of family and friends, drinking, grilling, throwing a ball, watching
the kids run through the sprinkler, chasing the dog, gardening, and taking a nap in the sun
are the kinds of things we live to do in the warm weather months after suffering through
our long winters, everybody knows this. The DEIS includes a noise reading for her
neighborhood that characterizes the ambient noise as rural ambient, that's how quiet their
neighborhood is, it's unbelievable, and it's into this peaceful environment that the LRT will
charge, effectively destroying people's ability to enjoy the use of their outdoor spaces in
the way that they expect to be able to do. This will radically change people's lives not only
temporarily with the construction activities, for how many years she hasn't been able to
find out, but permanently with constant noise interruptions day in and day out. Some of
her worst impacted neighbors will basically only be able to enjoy their homes when they
are asleep, if they can stay asleep, which is a very wrong thing. She said she was
flabbergasted to learn that in Golden Valley construction noise will be allowed 365 days a
year between the hours of 7 am and 10 pm. This is an outrage and it must be corrected.
Right now she asks that the City Council or the powers that be swiftly amend the City's
noise ordinance to bring it in line with that of Minneapolis. It's ironic that Minneapolis, the
big noisy, bustling city recognizes that its citizens need, and have the right to have, quiet
after 6 pm while Golden Valley, whose quiet is one of its main treasures does not, and in
fact has given it away and for what? It's admirable to be a cooperative regional neighbor,
but not when the well-being and property rights of your own citizens are thrown under the
train.
Father Paul Moudry, Pastor, St. Margaret Mary Church, said their concerns are noise and
pollution. If a station is built across the street from their church and the tracks go along
their western border the noise will be really incredible with 200 trains per day going by
with bells ringing as the train comes and goes from the station. The lights that would go
on at the station and potential parking areas would be detrimental to some of things that
they do at their campus with the neighborhood as well. Another concern is the pollution.
He knows the buses are scheduled to stop on Golden Valley Road which might be
environmentally friendly, but all the automobiles coming to and from the station and park
and ride with all their noise and exhaust would not. He said their campus looks quiet and
melancholy but it's very active 12 months of the year and they have an elementary school
on the property so there are a lot of safety concerns. He said strangers cannot go across
the school property. There are currently a few who go to the bus stop, but this would
really increase if there is any kind of a light rail station. There have been offerings in some
of the printed materials that their campus is one site being considered for a park and ride,
they strongly oppose that. He wants to make it clear to everybody that their campus isn't
Joint Meeting of the Planning Commission, Environmental Commission and Open
Space and Recreation Commission
May 15, 2014
Page 5
for sale, their parish isn't dying, it is growing and that the parish owns the property, not the
arch diocese. So noise, light and air pollution are some of their greatest concerns. And
the traffic going to and from their parish with lots of senior citizens is confusing for them
now, it will be even worse with added traffic.
Edward Johnson, 2718 Dupont Avenue South, said he is concerned about the comments
that have been made so far. He hopes that this has not devolved into another situation
currently being faced with the Southwest Corridor where the NIMBYs are definitely on the
way to destroying that line. He would hate to see the same thing happen to this line. This
nation, whether we want to realize it or not, is running out of energy, cheap oil, gas and
coal and we need to do all we can to develop electrified rail in this country and especially
here in the Twin Cities where we are so far behind compared to other cities. He said he
wants to make sure that this project is realized as a benefit both to the environment and
to future generations. He said there will be some construction noise and he lived along
the Hiawatha line while it was being built and he had no problem with living with the
construction noise and he has found that the line itself have very little noise compared to
the traffic on Hiawatha Avenue. He said he hopes the line and stations will be retrofitted
with restrooms for the aging population because that seems like something that has been
missed in the plans. He also hopes there will be some connecting street car lines
eventually to mitigate some of the bus and traffic noise. He said we've got to get serious
about electrified rail in this country and if we don't progress with the federal money that
will help, we won't get any and Minnesota doesn't get much federal money compared to
what we put into Washington. This is one way of getting some of our money back.
Mary Leach, 301 Meadow Lane South, said she absolutely cannot understand why usage
isn't being maximized. She finds it very difficult to understand why the Bottineau line is not
running through North Minneapolis for people who need the transportation the most.
There is the most vacant land for parking lots all along Broadway which is one
demolished building after another. She just fails to understand why we aren't taking all
this federal money and maximizing the usage for the greatest benefit for the greater good
and people who really need this. She said she is also concerned about going through
parkland which is such a precious and rare commodity. She said it is very hard to
understand how plans have evolved to this point considering what the needs and
objectives are.
Seeing and hearing no one else wishing to comment Chair Kluchka closed the public
hearing.
2. Discussion regarding a recommendation to the Golden Valley City Council
on the City's official comments
Kluchka asked how the content of the draft letter to the City Council was developed.
Zimmerman explained that it goes back to the City Council's response letter to the
Bottineau scoping documents and the issues the City wants to keep in the forefront and
Joint Meeting of the Planning Commission, Environmental Commission and Open
Space and Recreation Commission
May 15, 2014
Page 6
the things that need more study such as parking, impacts of traffic, and mitigation of
visual impacts along with flood plain and wetland impacts.
Kluchka asked about milestones and the next opportunities to provide comments before
municipal consent. Zimmerman explained that the comments from the Draft EIS public
hearings will go to the County and a Final EIS will be done. Then, the development
phase, or 30% design plan, will be done and that is when municipal consent is sought.
Steinberg asked how specific his questions/comments to staff should be. Zimmerman
explained that specific comments and concerns should be put on a comment card or
emailed to the County. He added that the City is trying to be broader in their comments at
this point and consultants will help with the details over the next two years. Steinberg said
he wants staff to address specific issues. Zimmerman stated that it is up to this group to
decide how detailed the DEIS response letter to the County should be.
Segelbaum said he thinks that broad topics need to be captured and then they can decide
if anything else should be added. Sandler said there are a lot of concerns and he thinks
they need to be very specific and complete as possible because the County needs to
know that they are serious.
Rosenquist said she likes the draft letter, but stronger language should be used. For
example when talking about mitigation instead of saying "if needed" it should say "as
needed" because the City needs to be a partner in these plans. She also said she thinks
things should be looked at in a future sense 20 to 50 years out and the environmental
impact.
Mattison said he is concerned about the obsequious nature of the draft letter and said that
the City Council doesn't need to thank the County three times for letting us comment on
the EIS. He said the most important thing to him is preserving Mary Hills Park. He doesn't
want to give up park land for nothing in return. He suggested reconsidering the order of
the five major points in the letter because mitigating noise and preserving nature areas
are more important than the parking issues discussed in the letter.
Kluchka asked the Commissioners if they think there is a sense of prioritization in the
letter. Cornelius said he thinks the items are prioritized because they are numbered. He
agreed that the City should use stronger language and stand up for itself. Segelbaum said
it will be difficult to prioritize the items. Sandler agreed that it will be difficult to say one
issue is more important than another. Kluchka suggested using bullets in the letter rather
than numbers. Kuebelbeck said they've heard over and over again concerns about the
environment and noise, and then traffic so the letter should have the items in that order to
have the same feeling.
Mattison said he would like to have another Open Space and Recreation meeting in order
to write their own comments. Baker said he thinks the Commissioner's charge from the
City Council is to incorporate the comments they've heard tonight into the DEIS response
Joint Meeting of the Planning Commission, Environmental Commission and Open
Space and Recreation Commission
May 15, 2014
Page 7
letter. Waldhauser added that there is a presumption that the Commissioners understand
the resident's concerns because they have attended all the various meetings. She stated
that at this point, this meeting is just one more opportunity for people to express their
concerns which she trusts will be summarized in the City's DEIS response letter.
Steinberg said he wants to make sure that things are addressed and there are number of
things missing in the DEIS. He questioned why Floyd Olson got 11 lines in the DEIS but
Bonnie Lane isn't mentioned and St. Margaret Mary Church is not listed as a historical
property.
Rosenquist stated that the timeline for construction is missing from the DEIS and she
didn't see an environmental plan or mention of impacts of the actual construction phase.
Mattison noted that the recreational and atheistic impacts on Mary Hills and other parks
are also missing. He said he wants a thorough analysis on the recreation impacts on this
very unique area. Waldhauser added the DEIS addresses the natural habitat but not the
human use of the area and suggested that issue be addressed. Grimes stated that those
concerns are in the response letter and that staff would add more detail to that section.
Sandler said he is concerned about mitigation. He said the DEIS doesn't address the real
issue and the response letter needs to say that if the level of impact is so great that it
can't be mitigated then the project is not worth it. Kluchka suggested that the response
letter state that the mitigation effects need to be studied. Sandler questioned how they will
be held accountable. Grimes reminded the Commissioners that the Bassett Creek
Watershed and the DNR will also be reviewing the DEIS.
Waldhauser said she thinks the response letter should focus on noise, lighting, increased
traffic on the existing freight line, and mitigation efforts. Sandler said there are things
prescribed in the DEIS, but the City needs to say they are not good enough. Zimmerman
noted that the City doesn't have control over the freight lines.
Galonska asked what the area will look like in 20 or 30 years and stated that the
Bottineau proposal could be detrimental to pedestrians.
Steinberg stated that Sochacki Park and Mary Hills Park were both at one time landfill
areas and that is not even mentioned in the DEIS. He said that should be mentioned as a
possible clean-up or focus area. Zimmerman said he would add language about the
landfill area to the response letter.
Segelbaum suggested placing more focus on pollution. Rosenquist noted that pollution is
discussed in the DEIS in terms of station planning. Waldhauser suggested that the
language regarding station locations be broadened to include noise, auto exhaust and
bus fumes.
Joint Meeting of the Planning Commission, Environmental Commission and Open
Space and Recreation Commission
May 15, 2014
Page 8
Waldhauser suggested language about personal safety in and around the stations and St.
Margaret Mary School be added to the response letter. Kluchka said the language about
safety should focus on prevention. Steinberg added that jurisdiction should also be
discussed. Rosenquist said safety of wildlife should also be included.
Cornelius stated that water control should be discussed in the response letter. Eckman
noted that stormwater and wetland issues are heavily regulated by other agencies.
Kluchka said there needs to be a plan for mitigation, accountability and expectations.
Mattison said he doesn't want the City's parkland to be the floodplain. Rosenquist stated
that the DEIS document considered the conditions as of two years ago and that it really
needs to look at the future. Eckman stated that much of this area is a floodplain and the
City wants the water to be in this area and not in people's homes. Kluchka asked if the
City could get a better park out of the project.
Baker said the DEIS doesn't do an adequate job of assessing the cost of noise and loss
of quiet and solitude. The Commissioners agreed that would be valuable information.
Waldhauser asked if visual renderings could be provided. Kluchka said he would like
visuals, rather than just tables, added to the EIS document.
Steinberg said he is concerned that there is no mention of bus service re-routing. Kluchka
said there should be clarity around transit access for Golden Valley.
Zimmerman said he would work on revising the response letter and send it to the
Commission Chairs before it goes forward to the Council for review.
3. Adjournment
The meeting was adjourned at 9:30 pm.
Charles D. Segelbaum, Secretary Lisa Wittman, Administrative Assistant
city of ,;.re;
golden MEMORANDUM
valley City Administration Council
763-593-8003/763-593-8109(fax)
Executive Summary For Action
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
June 17, 2014
Agenda Item
3. E. Board/Commission Appointments
Prepared By
Shep Harris, Mayor
Summary
Each year the City Council conducts interviews with persons who have applied to serve on a
board and/or commission. After the interviews are conducted the Council makes their
appointments.
Recommended Action
Motion to make the following appointments:
Planning Commission
Ronald Blum 1 year term term expires- May 1, 2015
Board of Zoning Appeals
David Perich 1 year term term expires- May 1, 2015
Environmental Commission
Larry Johnson 1 year term term expires- May 1, 2015
city f01
I .vv4r
golden MEMORANDUM
valley Police Department
763-593-8079/763-593-8098(fax)
Executive Summary For Action
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
June 171 2014
Agenda Item
3. F. Authorization to Sign School Resource Officer Service Agreement with Independent School
District 281
Prepared By
Stacy A. Carlson, Chief of Police
Summary
Independent School District 281 and the Police Department desire to participate in providing
specialized security services at the facility located at 2400 Sandburg Lane. A school resource
officer program is needed to improve understanding and promote mutual respect between
police, school, staff, counselors, parents and students.
An agreement has been drafted, stating the City will provide the services of one half time (.50)
police officer and related support services and supplies for the term of July 1, 2014 through June
30, 2015. The related costs for these services will be billed to School District 281 in an amount
not to exceed $32,050, depending on the number of student school days covered. All training,
supervision and records will be the responsibility of the City.
Attachments
• School Resource Officer Services Agreement for District#281 (3 pages)
Recommended Action
Motion to authorize the City Manager to sign the School Resource Officer Service Agreement
with Independent School District 281.
SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 281 AND THE CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY
THIS AGREEMENT made this day of 1 st day of July, 2014 by and between the
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 281, a school district, (hereinafter "School
District") and the CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY, a public corporation and political
subdivision of the State of Minnesota, (hereinafter"City").
Recitals
1. The City and the School District desire to deter and prevent crime and violence
within its middle schools and senior high schools.
2. The Safe Schools Levy provides monetary funds to school districts to hire school
resource officers to address violence, crime and safety related issues within
schools.
3. To that end,the City and the School District desire to collaboratively provide safe
school services.
NOW, THEREFORE,the City and the School District agree as follows:
Terms
4. TERM OF AGREEMENT/TERMINATION.
4.1 The Term of this Agreement shall be for a twelve month period from July 1,
2014 to June 30, 2015.
4.2 Either Parry may terminate this agreement upon a sixty(60) day written
notice to the other of such termination. In the event of a termination, any
payments due shall be prorated.
5. LEVY. The school district will levy the maximum amount permitted by law to
the property tax payers in the Robbinsdale School District to help fund the school
resource officer position(s).
6. PROGRAM FUNDING. By May 1 of each year the School District will meet
with the Chief Law Enforcement Officers of each community providing liaison
services to the School District to allocate available funds to support the cost for
the officers for the next school year. The City will invoice the School District for
the first half of the payment on January 1 and for the second half of the payment
on June 30. The funding provided for the 2014-2015 school year will be $64,100
per FTE.
7. SCHOOLS SERVED. The Sandburg Learning Center will receive school
resource officer services under this contract.
8. OFFICER SELECTIONS. The City will, depending on staffing levels, employ
or assign, in accordance with all applicable state laws, the police officers that will
participate in or serve as employees in the School Resource Officer program. The
City will employ or assign one half(0.50) FTE officer to serve as school resource
officer during the regular school year (170 student days) covered by the term of
this agreement and payment of$32,050 for Sandburg Learning Center. The
number of police officers serving in the school resource officer position may be
modified upon agreement of the City and the School District.
9. OFFICER COMPENSATION. The City will be responsible for all payments
regarding compensation, benefits,pension plans and withholdings for the officers
serving in the school resource officer capacity.
10. DUTIES OF THE OFFICER. The list of duties and work schedule of the
officer(s) shall be developed and agreed upon by the City and the School served.
The School Resource Officer position is a designated "school official"with
regard to the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act while under contract and
providing School Resource Officer services to the School District. The law
enforcement services provided to the School District will be at the sole discretion
of the City. Officer standards of performance, conduct and discipline of the
officer, performance reviews and other internal matters related to enforcement
services shall be under the authority of the City. The School District shall provide
the City with a written appraisal of the services rendered by the school resource
officer at the end of each contract term. The School District shall immediately
notify the City in writing of any performance deficiencies or inappropriate
conduct of the liaison. All disciplinary action shall be under the authority of the
City. Time spent in excess of eight(8) hours will be on a specific, case-by-case
basis and requiring the advance approval of the City and the School District.
11. ADDITIONAL OFFICER DUTIES. The school resource officer will respond
to emergency calls, attend police training, and any other special duties as assigned
by the City while fulfilling the school resource officer requirements under this
contract.
12. OFFICER SUPPLIES AND EQUIPMENT. The City shall provide any
required clothing, uniforms and vehicles, necessary to perform required duties as
outlined pursuant to section 10 of this contract.
13. INDEMNIFICATION. Except for claims arising out of the willful acts of
malfeasance in office,willful neglect of duty or bad faith of the other party or its
representatives, each parry shall indemnify and defend the other party against all
claims, expenses, and liabilities incurred, including reasonable attorney fees,
related to claims for loss of life, personal injury, and/or damage to property
arising out of any occurrence in upon or at the School District properties in
accordance with the execution of the school resource officer duties under this
contract. Neither parry waives any defenses or immunities available under
Minnesota Statutes Chapter 466.
14. NOTICE. Any notice, demand, request or other communication that may or shall
be given or served by the parties, shall be deemed to have been given or served on
the date the same is deposited in the United States mail, registered or certified
postage prepaid and addressed as follows: If to the City: Attn: Police Chief,
Golden Valley Police Department, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley,
MN 55427; If so to the School District, Attn: Director of Finance, Business
Office, 4148 Winnetka Avenue N.,New Hope, MN 55427.
15. ENTIRE AGREEMENT; AMENDMENTS. This contract constitutes the
entire agreement between the parties and no other agreement prior to this
agreement or contemporaneous herewith shall be effective except as expressly set
forth or incorporated herein. Any purported amendment shall not be effective
unless it shall be set forth in writing and executed by both parties.
CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY
By
City Manager
Date
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 281
By
Executive Director of Business Services
Date
city )f 1!114r
golden MEMORANDUM
valley
Finance Department
763-593-8013/763-593-8109(fax)
Executive Summary For Action
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
June 17, 2014
Agenda Item
3. G. Appointing Absentee Ballot Board Election Judges for Primary Election
Prepared By
Kris Luedke, City Clerk
Summary
The City needs to appoint election judges to represent the Absentee Ballot Board. These election
judges will have the responsibility of accepting and rejecting absentee ballots based on the
criteria set by the State.
Hennepin County will approve judges that will be responsible for accepting/rejecting all in person
absentee ballots received at the Hennepin County Government Center counter. Those ballots
then will be sent to the City for counting.
Attachments
• Resolution Appointing Absentee Ballot Board Election Judges for the August 12, 2014 Primary
Election (2 pages)
Recommended Action
Motion to adopt Resolution appointing Absentee Ballot Board Election Judges for the August 12,
2014 Primary Election.
Resolution 14-50 June 17, 2014
Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION APPOINTING ABSENTEE BALLOT BOARD ELECTION JUDGES
FOR THE AUGUST 12, 2014 PRIMARY ELECTION
WHEREAS, Minnesota Election Law 20413.21 requires that persons serving as
election judges be appointed by the Council at least 25 days before the election; and
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Golden Valley City Council that the
individuals named on Exhibit A, and on file in the office of the City Clerk be appointed as
the City of Golden Valley Absentee Ballot Board Election Judges for the August 12, 2014
Primary Election; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED the Golden Valley City Council also appoints other
individuals and all members appointed to the Hennepin County Absentee Ballot Board as
authorized under Minn. Stat. 204B.21, subd. 2 under the direction of the Election Manager
to serve as members of the Golden Valley Absentee Ballot Board; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is with this, authorized to make any
substitutions or additions as deemed necessary.
Joanie Clausen, Mayor Pro Tem
ATTEST:
Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member
and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor
Pro Tem and her signature attested by the City Clerk.
Resolution 14-50 - Continued June 17, 2014
EXHIBIT A
City of Golden Valley Absentee Ballot Board
August 12, 2014 Primary Election
Constance Hietala
Mary Hill
Marjorie Stresemann
Mary Van Hook
Sue Watson
Meagan Weber
city 0f
golden1! MEMORANDUM
valley Finance Department
763-593-8013/763-593-8109(fax)
Executive Summary For Action
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
June 171 2014
Agenda Item
3. H. Approval of Requests for Beer and/or Wine at Brookview Park
Prepared By
Kris Luedke, City Clerk
Summary
As per City Code Section 10.83, Subd. 2 I. "No person shall possess, display, consume or use
alcoholic beverages on any City park property, unless permission is granted by the Council." As
part of the application process for a Facilities Use Permit to use the large and small picnic shelters
at Brookview Park the applicant has the option to pay an additional $25 to be able to serve beer
and/or wine. Attached is a list of the individuals and/or organizations who have requested that
option.
Attachments
• Beer and/or wine request list (1 page)
Recommended Action
Motion to approve the requests for beer and/or wine at Brookview Park as recommended by
staff.
BEER AND/OR WINE REQUEST LIST
INDIVIDUAL OR ORGANIZATION CC DATE
DATE TIME SHELTER APPROVED
Mari Senden -Allianz 06-18 11 am -4 pm Small 06-17-14
Amanda Terrien - Spectrum 06-21 11 am -4 pm Small 06-17-14
Shelly Jacobs - OGI 06-24 5 pm - 10 pm Large 06-17-14
James Davis 07-13 5 pm - 10 pm Small 06-17-14
Autumn Arvidson - Eye Care Asso. 08-26 5 pm - 10 pm Large 06-17-14
Angie Schmidt 08-29 5 pm - 10 pm Large 06-17-14
Jim Kurtz 09-07 5 pm - 10 pm Large 06-17-14
Judi Boone - Honeywell 09-12 11 am -4 pm Large 06-17-14
Paul Green 06-24 5 pm - 10 pm Small 06-17-14
Dan Oie - Calvary Lutheran Church 06-25 5 pm - 10 pm Small 06-17-14
Tyler Eichhorst 06-26 5 pm - 10 pm Small 06-17-14
Janine Anderss 07-12 5 pm - 10 pm Large 06-17-14
Kris Ahlbrecht 07-29 5 pm - 10 pm Large 06-17-14
Tami Yanta -TCF 08-08 11 am -4 pm Small 06-17-14
Mike Defo -TCF 08-08 11 am -4 pm Large 06-17-14
Karin Orn 08-31 11 am -4 pm Small 06-17-14
city o� "°'
gotaenl, . .4. � MEMORANDUM
valley Planning Department
763-593-8095/763-593-8109(fax)
Executive Summary For Action
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
June 17, 2014
Agenda Item
3. I. Neighborhood Meeting Policy- Planning Division
Prepared By
Jason Zimmerman, City Planner
Summary
Responding to direction from the Council, Staff has researched the neighborhood meeting
policies of other local communities and has created a new policy for Golden Valley that requires
neighborhood meetings for Conditional Use Permit, Planned Unit Development, subdivision, and
rezoning applications when they are located within or adjacent to a residential zoning district.
Neighborhood meetings would be held after an application has been filed but prior to an informal
public hearing at the Planning Commission. Notifications would be sent by the Applicant to
property owners within the same notification distance as required under the requirements of
Chapter 11 of the City Code. The Applicant would host the meeting and make the presentation; a
City representative may be present to observe and to answer questions about policy or process.
A copy of the notification would need to be submitted to the Planning Division, members of the
Planning Commission, and members of the City Council prior to the meeting and a summary of
the meeting and a copy of the sign-in sheet would need to be submitted to the Planning Division
after the meeting.
Attachments
• Resolution Approving a Neighborhood Meeting Policy- Planning Division (2 page)
Recommended Action
Motion to approve Resolution for the Neighborhood Meeting Policy- Planning Division.
Resolution 14-51 June 17, 2014
Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION APPROVING A NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING
POLICY - PLANNING DIVISION
WHEREAS, development of land can result in visual and physical impacts to
neighboring properties; and
WHEREAS, developers and property owners have an obligation to share potential
changes with neighboring property owners; and
WHEREAS, open communication with an opportunity to provide feedback in a timely
fashion is a priority; and
WHEREAS, a Neighborhood Meeting Policy can clearly dictate the terms under
which this review can be carried out.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council for the City of Golden
Valley adopts the Neighborhood Meeting Policy - Planning Division dated May 13, 2014,
attached hereto as Exhibit A.
Joanie Clausen, Mayor Pro Tem
ATTEST:
Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member
and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor
Pro Tem and her signature attested by the City Clerk.
Resolution 14-51 - Continued June 17, 2014
EXHIBIT A
Neighborhood Meeting Policy
Planning Division
Revised May 13, 2014
Neighborhood meetings shall be held whenever a proposal is located within or adjacent to
a residential zoning district, or whenever Planning Staff feels the potential impact is great
enough to warrant such a meeting. The types of proposals that require neighborhood
meetings include: Conditional Use Permits, Planned Unit Developments, subdivisions, and
rezonings.
The Applicant shall hold the neighborhood meeting at an accessible location in order to
provide information to residents and to gather feedback prior to the public hearing.
Meeting Guidelines:
1. The meeting shall be scheduled after the formal application has been received by the
Planning Division but at least 7 days prior to the informal public hearing at the
Planning Commission. Notices shall be sent out by the Applicant to the same
properties that will be notified for the public hearing and shall be received at least 10
days prior to the meeting date. If Planning Staff feels additional time is warranted to
receive neighborhood input, meetings may be scheduled prior to the submission of a
formal application.
2. Meetings shall be held between 6:30 pm and 8 pm, Monday through Thursday.
Meetings shall not be held on holidays. The Applicant is encouraged to check potential
meeting dates with Planning Staff.
3. The Applicant shall host the meeting and make the presentation. A City representative
may be in attendance to observe and to answer questions about City policy and
process.
4. A copy of the neighborhood meeting notice shall be sent to the Planning Division,
members of the Planning Commission, and members of the City Council.
5. A sign-in sheet shall be kept and a copy provided to the Planning Division, along with
a summary of the meeting, after its conclusion.
Notices shall include the following:
• Applicant name, address, and phone number
• Property location (map)
• Description of the proposed project and specific application request
• Meeting date, time, and location
• Outline of expected process (ie, informal public hearing at Planning Commission
followed by formal public hearing at City Council, etc.)
city 0)
i'
golden MEMORANDUM
valley Planning Department
763-593-8095/763-593-8109(fax)
a �
Executive Summary For Action
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
June 17, 2014
Agenda Item
3. J. Authorization to Sign the Joint Cooperation Agreement with Hennepin County for
Participation in the Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant Program for
Fiscal Years 2015-2017
Prepared By
Mark Grimes, Community Development Director
Summary
In order to receive Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds the City of Golden Valley,
along with other Hennepin County cities, has entered into an agreement with Hennepin County.
The current agreement runs through the end of September 2014. In order to continue receiving
CDBG funds from the Federal government after that date, a new Joint Cooperation Agreement
for FY 2015-2017 must be signed by the City and Hennepin County. The attached resolution
authorizes the Mayor and City Manager to sign the agreement on behalf of the City.
Attachments
• Joint Cooperation Agreement Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant
Program (9 pages)
• Resolution Authorizing the Execution of a Joint Cooperative Agreement Between the City of
Golden Valley and Hennepin County for Participation in the Urban Hennepin County
Community Development Block Grant Program in FY 2015-2017 (1 page)
Recommended Action
Motion to adopt Resolution authorizing the execution of the Joint Cooperative Agreement
between the City of Golden Valley and Hennepin County for participation in the Urban Hennepin
County Community Development Block Grant Program in Fiscal Year 2015-2017.
Contract No. 140805
JOINT COOPERATION AGREEMENT
URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM
THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into by and between the COUNTY OF HENNEPIN, State of
Minnesota,hereinafter referred to as"COUNTY,"A-2400 Government Center,Minneapolis,Minnesota,55487,
and the cities executing this Master Agreement, each hereinafter respectively referred to as "COOPERATING
UNIT,"said parties to this Agreement each being governmental units of the State of Minnesota,and made pursuant
to Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.59.
WITNESSETH:
COOPERATING UNIT and COUNTY agree that it is desirable and in the interests of their citizens that
COOPERATING UNIT shares its authority to carry out essential community development and housing activities
with COUNTY in order to permit COUNTY to secure and administer Community Development Block Grant and
HOME Investment Partnership funds as an Urban County within the provisions of the Act as herein defined and,
therefore,in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained in this Agreement,the parties mutually
agree to the following terms and conditions.
COOPERATING UNIT acknowledges that by the execution of this Agreement that it understands that it:
1. May not also apply for grants under the State CDBG Program from appropriations for fiscal
years during which it is participating in the Urban County Program;and
2. May not participate in a HOME Consortium except through the Urban County.
3. May not receive a formula allocation under the Emergency Solutions Grants(ESG)Program
except through the Urban County.
L DEFINITIONS
The definitions contained in 42 U.S.C. 5302 of the Act and 24 CFR §570.3 of the Regulations are
incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof,and the terms defined in this section have the meanings
given them:
A. "Act"means Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974,as amended,(42 U.S.C.
5301 et seq.).
B. "Activity" means a CDBG-funded activity eligible under Title I of the Housing and Community
Development Act of 1974, as amended. Example: single family rehab activity.
C. "Annual Program"means those combined activities submitted by cooperating units to COUNTY for
CDBG funding as part of the Consolidated Plan.
D. "Consolidated Plan" means the document bearing that title or similarly required statements or
documents submitted to HUD for authorization to expend the annual grant amount and which is
1
developed by the COUNTY in conjunction with COOPERATING UNITS as part of the Community
Development Block Grant Program.
E. "Cooperating Unit(s)"means any city or town in Hennepin County that has entered into a cooperation
agreement that is identical to this Agreement, as well as Hennepin County,which is a party to each
Agreement.
F. "HUD"means the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development.
G. "Metropolitan City"means any city located in whole or in part in Hennepin County which is certified
by HUD to have a population of 50,000 or more people.
H. "Program"means the HUD Community Development Block Grant Program as defined under Title I of
the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended.
1. "Program Income"means gross income received by the recipient or a subrecipient directly generated
from the use of CDBG.
J. "Regulations" means the rules and regulations promulgated pursuant to the Act, including but not
limited to 24 CFR Part 570.
K. "Urban County"means the entitlement jurisdiction within the provisions of the Act and includes the
suburban Hennepin County municipalities which are signatories to this Agreement.
H. PURPOSE
The purpose of this Agreement is to authorize COUNTY and COOPERATING UNIT to cooperate to
undertake, or assist in undertaking, community renewal and lower income housing assistance activities and
authorizes COUNTY to carry out these and other eligible activities for the benefit of eligible recipients who reside
within the corporate limits of the COOPERATING UNIT which will be funded from annual Community
Development Block Grant, Emergency Solutions Grants (ESG) Programs and HOME appropriations for the
Federal Fiscal Years 2015,2016 and 2017 and from any program income generated from the expenditure of such
funds.
III. AGREEMENT
The initial term of this Agreement is for a period commencing on October 1,2014 and terminating no sooner than
the end of the program year covered by the Consolidated Plan for the basic grant amount for the Fiscal Year 2017,
as authorized by HUD,and for such additional time as may be required for the expenditure of funds granted to the
County for such period. Prior to the end of the initial term and the end of each subsequent qualification period,
the COUNTY, as the lead agency of the URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM, shall provide a written notice to the COOPERATING UNIT of their right not to
participate in a subsequent qualification period. The written notice will provide the COOPERATING UNIT a
minimum thirty(30)day period to submit a written withdrawal. If the COOPERATING UNIT does not submit to
the COUNTY a written withdrawal during the notice period,this Agreement shall be automatically extended for a
subsequent three-year qualifying period.
This Agreement must be amended by written agreement of all parties to incorporate any future changes
necessary to meet the requirements for cooperation agreements set forth in the Urban County Qualification Notice
applicable for the year in which the next qualification of the County is scheduled. Failure by either party to adopt
2
such an amendment to the Agreement shall automatically terminate the Agreement following the expenditure of all
CDBG and HOME funds allocated for use in the COOPERATING UNIT's jurisdiction.
This Agreement shall remain in effect until the CDBG, HOME and ESG funds and program income
received (with respect to activities carried out during the three-year qualification period, and any successive
qualification periods under agreements that provide for automatic renewals)are expended and the funded activities
completed. COUNTY and COOPERATING UNIT cannot terminate or withdraw form this Agreement while it
remains in effect.
Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement,this Agreement may be terminated at the end of the
program period during which HUD withdraws its designation of the COUNTY as an Urban County under the Act.
This Agreement shall be executed by the appropriate officers of COOPERATING UNIT and COUNTY
pursuant to authority granted them by their respective governing bodies,and a copy of the authorizing resolution
and executed Agreement shall be filed promptly by the COOPERATING UNIT in the Hennepin County
Department of Housing,Community Works and Transit so that the Agreement can be submitted to HUD by July
25, 2014.
COOPERATING UNIT and COUNTY shall take all actions necessary to assure compliance with the urban
county's certifications required by Section 104(b)of the Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act
of 1974,as amended, including Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964;the Fair Housing Act,and affirmatively
furthering fair housing. COOPERATING UNIT and COUNTY shall also take all actions necessary to assure
compliance with Section 109 of Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 (which
incorporates Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act Of 1973 and the Age Discrimination Act of 1975), and other
applicable laws.
IV. ACTIVITIES
COOPERATING UNIT agrees that awarded grant funds will be used to undertake and carry out,within the
terms of this Agreement,certain activities eligible for funding under the Act. The COUNTY agrees and will assist
COOPERATING UNIT.in the undertaking of such essential activities by providing the services specified in this
Agreement. The parties mutually agree to comply with all applicable requirements of the Act and the Regulations
and other relevant Federal and/or Minnesota statutes or regulations in the use of basic grant amounts. Nothing in
this Article shall be construed to lessen or abrogate the COUNTY's responsibility to assume all obligations of an
applicant under the Act, including the development of the Consolidated Plan, pursuant to 24 CFR Part 91.
COOPERATING UNIT further specifically agrees as follows:
A. COOPERATING UNIT will,in accord with a COUNTY-established schedule,prepare and provide to
the COUNTY, in a prescribed form, requests for the use of Community Development Block Grant
Funds consistent with this Agreement, program regulations and the Urban Hennepin County
Consolidated Plan.
B. COOPERATING UNIT acknowledges that,pursuant to 24 CFR§570.501 (b),it is subject to the same
requirements applicable to subrecipients, including the requirement for a written Subrecipient
Agreement set forth in 24 CFR§570.503. The Subrecipient Agreement will cover the implementation
requirements for each activity funded pursuant to this Agreement and shall be duly executed with and
in a form prescribed by the COUNTY.
C. COOPERATING UNIT acknowledges that it is subject to the same subrecipient requirements stated in
paragraph B above in instances where an agency other than itself is undertaking an activity pursuant to
3
this Agreement on behalf of COOPERATING UNIT. In such instances, a written Third Party
Agreement shall be duly executed between the agency and COOPERATING UNIT in a form
prescribed by COUNTY.
D. COOPERATING UNITS shall expend all funds annually allocated to activities pursuant to the
Subrecipient Agreement.
1. All funds not expended pursuant to the terms of the Subrecipient Agreement will be
relinquished to the COUNTY and will be transferred to a separate account for reallocation on
a competitive request for proposal basis at the discretion of the COUNTY where total of such
funds is$100,000 or greater. Amounts less than$100,000 shall be allocated by COUNTY to
other existing activities consistent with timeliness requirements and Consolidated Plan goals.
E. COUNTY and COOPERATING UNITS shall expend all program income pursuant to this Agreement
as provided below:
1. Program income from housing rehabilitation activities administered by the COUNTY will be
incorporated into a pool at the discretion of the COUNTY. The pool will be administered by
COUNTY and will be used for housing rehabilitation projects located throughout the entire
Urban County.When possible,COUNTY will give priority to funding housing rehabilitation
projects within the COOPERATING UNIT where the program income was generated. Funds
expended in this manner would be secured by a Repayment Agreement/Mortgage running in
favor of the COUNTY. Program income generated by certain COOPERATING UNITS that
administer their own housing rehabilitation activities may be retained by the COOPERATING
UNIT at its discretion; however, such COOPERATING UNITS will be bound by the
conditions of D.2.,above. Only COOPERATING UNITS that were administering their own
activities pursuant to the Joint Cooperation Agreement pertaining to the HUD fiscal years
2012-2014 will be eligible to retain their program income.
2. COUNTY reserves the option to recapture program income generated by non-housing
rehabilitation activities if said funds have not been expended within twelve (12) months of
being generated. These funds shall be transferred to a separate account for reallocation on a
competitive request for proposal basis administered by COUNTY or,where the total of such
funds does not exceed$100,000,shall be reallocated by COUNTY to other existing activities
consistent with timeliness requirements and Consolidated Plan goals.
F. COOPERATING UNITS are encouraged to undertake joint activities involving the sharing of funding
when such action furthers the goals of the Consolidated Plan and meets the expenditure goals.
G. If COUNTY is notified by HUD that it has not met the performance standard for the timely
expenditure of funds at 24 CFR 570.902(a)and the COUNTY entitlement grant is reduced by HUD
according to its policy on corrective actions, then the basic grant amount to any COOPERATING
UNIT that has not met its expenditure goal shall be reduced accordingly.
H. COOPERATING UNIT will take actions necessary to assist in accomplishing the community
development program and housing goals, as contained in the Urban Hennepin County Consolidated
Plan.
I. COOPERATING UNIT shall ensure that all activities funded,in part or in full by grant funds received
pursuant to this Agreement,shall be undertaken affirmatively with regard to fair housing,employment
and business opportunities for minorities and women. It shall, in implementing all programs and/or
4
activities funded by the basic grant amount,comply with all applicable Federal and Minnesota Laws,
statutes, rules and regulations with regard to civil rights, affirmative action and equal employment
opportunities and Administrative Rule issued by the COUNTY.
J. COOPERATING UNIT that does not affirmatively further fair housing within its own jurisdiction or
that impedes action by COUNTY to comply with its fair housing certification shall be prohibited from
receiving CDBG funding for any activities.
K. COOPERATING UNIT shall participate in the citizen participation process, as established by
COUNTY,in compliance with the requirements of the Housing and Community Development Act of
1974,as amended.
L. COOPERATING UNIT shall reimburse COUNTY for any expenditure determined by HUD or
COUNTY to be ineligible.
M. COOPERATING UNIT shall prepare, execute, and cause to be filed all documents protecting the
interests of the parties hereto or any other party of interest as may be designated by the COUNTY.
N. COOPERATING UNIT has adopted and is enforcing:
1. A policy prohibiting the use of excessive force by law enforcement agencies within its
jurisdiction against any individuals engaged in nonviolent civil rights demonstrations; and
2. A policy of enforcing applicable State and local laws against physically barring entrance to or
exit from a facility or location which is the subject of such nonviolent civil rights
demonstrations within its jurisdiction.
O. COOPERATING UNIT shall not sell,trade,or otherwise transfer all or any portion of grant funds to
another metropolitan city,urban county, unit of general local government,or Indian tribe,or insular
area that directly or indirectly receives CDBG funds in exchange for any other funds,credits or non-
Federal considerations,but must use such funds for activities eligible under Title I of the Act.
COUNTY further specifically agrees as follows:
A. COUNTY shall prepare and submit to HUD and appropriate reviewing agencies,on an annual basis,
all plans, statements and program documents necessary for receipt of a basic grant amount under the
Act.
B. COUNTY shall provide, to the maximum extent feasible, technical assistance and coordinating
services to COOPERATING UNIT in the preparation and submission of a request for funding.
C. COUNTY shall provide ongoing technical assistance to COOPERATING UNIT to aid COUNTY in
fulfilling its responsibility to HUD for accomplishment of the community development program and
housing goals.
D. COUNTY shall, upon official request by COOPERATING UNIT,agree to administer local housing
rehabilitation activities funded pursuant to the Agreement, provided that COUNTY shall receive
Twelve percent(12%)of the allocation by COOPERATING UNIT to the activity as reimbursement for
costs associated with the administration of COOPERATING UNIT activity.
5
E. COUNTY may, at its discretion and upon official request by COOPERATING UNIT, agree to
administer, for a possible fee, other activities funded pursuant to this Agreement on behalf of
COOPERATING UNIT.
F. COUNTY may,as necessary for clarification and coordination of program administration,develop and
implement Administrative Rules consistent with the Act,Regulations,HUD administrative directives,
and administrative requirements of COUNTY.
V. ALLOCATION OF BASIC GRANT AMOUNTS
Basic grant amounts received by the COUNTY under Section 106 of the Act shall be allocated as follows:
A. Planning and administration costs are capped to 20 percent of the sum of grant plus program income
that is received during the program year. During the term of this Agreement the COUNTY anticipates
planning and administrative retainage of thirteen to fifteen percent (13-15%);included in this
administrative amount is funding for annual county-wide Fair Housing activities.
B. The balance of the basic grant amount shall be made available by COUNTY to COOPERATING
UNITS in accordance with the formula stated in part C and the procedure stated in part D of this
section utilizing U.S. Census Bureau data. The allocation is for planning purposes only and is not a
guarantee of funding.
C. Allocation of funding will be based upon a formula using U.S.Census Bureau data that bears the same
ratio to the balance of the basic grant amount as the average of the ratios between:
1. The population of COOPERATING UNIT and the population of all COOPERATING UNITS.
2. The extent of poverty in COOPERATING UNIT and the extent of poverty in all
COOPERATING UNITS.
3. The extent of overcrowded housing by units in COOPERATING UNIT and the extent of
overcrowded housing by units in all COOPERATING UNITS.
4. In determining the average of the above ratios,the ratio involving the extent of poverty shall
be counted twice.
D. Funds will be made available to communities utilizing the formula specified in C of this Section in the
following manner:
1. All COOPERATING UNITS with aggregate formula percentages of greater than three and
one half percent(3.5%)of the total using the procedure in part C.of this section will receive
funding allocations in accordance with the COUNTY formula allocations.
2. COOPERATING UNITS with aggregate formula percentages of three and one half percent
(3.5%)or less of the total using the procedure in part C. of this section will have their funds
consolidated into a pool for award in a manner determined by COUNTY on a competitive
request for proposal basis. Only the COUNTY and COOPERATING UNITS whose funding
has been pooled will be eligible to compete for these funds.
6
E. The COUNTY shall develop these ratios based upon data to be furnished by HUD. The COUNTY
assumes no duty to gather such data independently and assumes no liability for any errors in the data
furnished by HUD.
F. In the event COOPERATING UNIT does not request a funding allocation, or a portion thereof, the
amount not requested shall be made available to other participating communities, in a manner
determined by COUNTY.
VI. METROPOLITAN CITIES
Any metropolitan city executing this Agreement shall defer their entitlement status and become part of
Urban Hennepin County.
This agreement can be voided if the COOPERATING UNIT is advised by HUD,prior to the completion of
the re-qualification process for fiscal years 2015-2017, that it is eligible to become a metropolitan city and the
COOPERATING UNIT elects to take its entitlement status. If the agreement is not voided on the basis of the
COOPERATING UNIT's eligibility as a metropolitan city prior to June 20,2014,the COOPERATING UNIT must
remain a parr of the COUNTY program for the entire three-year period of the COUNTY qualification.
VII. OPINION OF COUNSEL
The undersigned, on behalf of the Hennepin County Attorney, having reviewed this Agreement,hereby
opines that the terms and provisions of the Agreement are fully authorized under State and local law and that the
COOPERATING UNIT has full legal authority to undertake or assist in undertaking essential community
development and housing assistance activities, specifically urban renewal and publicly-assisted housing.
Assistant County Attorney
7
VIII. HENNEPIN COUNTY EXECUTION
The Hennepin County Board of Commissioners having duly approved this Agreement on ,
2014,and pursuant to such approval and the proper County official having signed this Agreement,the COUNTY
agrees to be bound by the provisions herein set forth.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN, STATE OF MINNESOTA
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By:
Chair of its County Board
Assistant County Attorney
And:
Date: Assistant/Deputy/County Administrator
Attest:
Deputy/Clerk of the County Board
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL
Assistant County Administrator- Public Works
Date:
Department,Housing, Community Works and Transit
Date:
8
IX. COOPERATING UNIT EXECUTION
COOPERATING UNIT,having signed this Agreement,and the COOPERATING UNIT'S governing body
having duly approved this Agreement on ,2014,and pursuant to such approval and the proper city
official having signed this Agreement,COOPERATING UNIT agrees to be bound by the provisions of this Joint
Cooperation Agreement.
CITY OF
By:
Its Mayor
And:
Its City Manager
ATTEST:
CITY MUST CHECK ONE:
The City is organized pursuant to:
Plan A Plan B Charter
9
Resolution 14-52 June 17, 2014
Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A JOINT COOPERATION
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY AND HENNEPIN COUNTY
FOR PARTICIPATION IN THE URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM FY 2015-2017
WHEREAS, the City of Golden Valley, Minnesota and the County of Hennepin have
in effect a Joint Cooperation Agreement for purposes of qualifying as an Urban County
under the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development Community
Development Block Grant (CDBG), Emergency Solutions Grants (ESG) Program, and
HOME Investment Partnerships (HOME) Programs; and
WHEREAS, the City and County wish to execute a new Joint Cooperation
Agreement in order to continue to qualify as an Urban County for purposes of the
Community Development Block Grant, ESG and HOME Programs.
NOW, BE IT THERFORE RESOLVED that a new Joint Cooperation Agreement
between the City and County be executed effective October 1, 2014 and that the Mayor
and the City Manager be authorized and directed to sign the Agreement on behalf of the
City.
Joanie Clausen, Mayor Pro Tem
ATTEST:
Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member
and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor
Pro Tem and her signature attested by the City Clerk.
city 0 i i
J
MEMORANDUM
9011v"aliley Public Works Department
763-593-8030/763-593-3988(fax)
Executive Summary For Action
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
June 17, 2014
Agenda Item
3. K. Establish Permanent No Parking Zones on Florida Avenue North
Prepared By
Jeff Oliver, PE, City Engineer
Mark Ray, PE, Street Maintenance Supervisor
Summary
In the early summer of 2014, a resident of Florida Avenue North and Fire Chief Crelly contacted Public
Works with a concern regarding resident and emergency access on Florida Avenue North between
Medicine Lake Road and the cul-de-sac due to on-street parking. Due to the sports programming at
the Sandburg fields, many vehicles park on both sides of Florida Avenue resulting in residents having
trouble accessing their own homes. One resident noted that he had to pull in his mirrors on his truck
to fit down the street. Additionally, Fire Chief Crelly had concerns about navigating a smaller fire
rescue truck down the street in an emergency and he noted a large fire truck would likely not fit.
The City's Traffic Safety Committee has reviewed this concern and determined that permanent no
parking restrictions are appropriate to address this issue.
The proposed parking restrictions on the west side of Florida Avenue North will extend from Medicine
Lake Road south to a point 10 feet east of the fire hydrant in the cul-de-sac. These restrictions will
allow for residents to access their homes and emergency vehicles to safely navigate the street event
during peak event parking. Due to the immediate concern regarding public safety access, temporary
no parking signs have been placed along Florida Avenue North.
Attachments
• Location map (1 page)
• Resolution Restricting Vehicle Parking On the West side of Florida Avenue North (1 page)
• Letter to residents explaining the proposed Council action (1 page)
Recommended Action
Motion to adopt Resolution restricting vehicle parking on the west side of Florida Avenue North.
C) cY S
QD LO N 11 CO
UD m
CS?
z
2530
2527 '
m
- 2520
2515
2508
2505 Restriction
No-Parking (anytime)
2502
2501
Parking Restrictions
No Parking (current)
Proposed No Parking
Llty OtPrint Date:6/5/2014
gOZderl Florida Ave N Sources:
Hennepin County Surveyors Office for
a Property Lines(2014).
vaw Parking 0 50 100 200
Feet
Resolution 14-53 June 17, 2014
Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION RESTRICTING VEHICLE PARKING
ON THE WEST SIDE OF FLORIDA AVENUE NORTH
WHEREAS, the City Council has the power and authority, pursuant to Chapter 9.06,
Subd. 2 of the City Code, to designate no parking zones and areas, and it appears that no
parking zones should be created on Florida Avenue North. The following parking prohibition
will be in effect:
1. No parking will be permitted on the west side of Florida Avenue North from Medicine
Lake Road south to a point 10 feet east of the fire hydrant located in the cul-de-sac.
NOW, BE IT THEREFORE RESOLVED by the City Council for the City of Golden
Valley to permanently restrict parking on the west side of Florida Avenue North from
Medicine Lake Road south to a point 10 feet beyond the fire hydrant located in the cul-de-
sac.
Joanie Clausen, Mayor Pro Tem
ATTEST:
Kristine A Luedke, City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member
and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor
Pro Tem and her signature attested by the City Clerk.
June 10, 2014
Resident
ADDRESS
Golden Valley, MN 55427
Subject: Proposed No Parking Restrictions on Florida Avenue North
Dear Resident:
In the early summer of 2014, one of your neighbors on Florida Avenue North and Fire
Chief John Crelly contacted Public Works with a concern regarding resident and
emergency access on Florida Avenue North, between Medicine Lake Road and the cul-de-
sac, due to on-street parking related to events at the Sandburg fields. The City's Traffic
Safety Committee has reviewed this concern and determined that permanent no parking
restrictions are appropriate to address this issue.
The proposed parking restrictions on the west side of Florida Avenue North will extend
from Medicine Lake Road south to a point 10 feet east of the fire hydrant in the cul-de-
sac. These restrictions will allow for residents to access their homes and emergency
vehicles to safely navigate the street event during peak event parking.
The proposed parking restrictions will be considered by the Golden Valley City Council at
the June 17 meeting. If you have concerns, please contact me by phone (763.593.3960),
email (mray@goldenvalleymn.gov), or mail and I will forward your comments to the City
Council.
Sincerely,
r-�J d
Mark Ray, PE
Street Maintenance Supervisor
C: Traffic Safety Committee
^
ty 0
���� MEMORANDUM 0��8 �w� �� �� ��� ��m � � ���
"��' ���� �� ���� �-� �� ��. ��� � �/ �� ��'�
golden ,
a - - - PlanningDep
artmemt
7£3-593'8095/763-593-8Y09(fax)
Executive Summary For Action
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
June 17? 2014
°@QDays" Deadline:June 24, 2014
Agenda Item
4. A. Public Hearing- Ordinance#518 - Final Design Plan Approval - Morrie's Golden Valley PUD
#Il5 ' K4orrie'sAutomotive Group (Maserati & Bent|ey), Applicant
Prepared By
Jason Zimmerman, City Planner
Summary
Morrie's Automotive Group is seeking approval of a Planned Unit Development (PUD) permit to
develop an additional, standalone, dealership within the existing parking lot at 7400 Wayzata
Bou|evard. Thepropertyiszoned ''|'394K8ixedUse'' andguidedfor |on#-terrn ''K4ixedUse" on
the General Land Use Plan map.
The total lot area is currently 5.6 acres. Under the proposal, a new one acre lot would be created
in the southeast corner. The site currently contains the Morrie's Cadillac dealership; it would be
joined by a Maserati and Bentley dealership in a new building on the new lot.
The new building would have a footprint of 11,640 square feet and total square footage of
20,986. The first floor would contain showrooms as well as sales offices and workspaces. A car
elevator would be incorporated into the interior of the building to allow cars to be brought up to
an additional showroom on the second floor. A covered service drive would be located on the
north side of the building. Landscaping would be installed around the building and parking area
as well as new trees planted along Pennsylvania Avenue. Parking would be adequate to meet the
requirements of both uses on the site.
City Code establishes standards for PUDs, which are laid out in the staff report to the Planning
Commission. In addition, City Code establishes findings that must be made by the City when
creating a PUD. These findings are included in the City Council's recommended action.
The Council makes the following findings pursuant to City Code Section 11.55, Subd. 6(Q):
1. The PUD plan is tailored to the specific characteristics of the site and achieves a higher quality
of site planning and design than generally expected under conventional provisions of the
ordinance.
2. The PUD plan preserves and protects substantial desirable portions of the site's characteristics,
open space and sensitive environmental features including steep slopes, trees, scenic views,
creeks, wetlands and open waters.
3. The PUD plan includes efficient and effective use (which includes preservation) of the land.
4. The PUD plan results in development compatible with adjacent uses and is consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan and redevelopment plans and goals.
5. The PUD plan is consistent with preserving and improving the general health, safety and
general welfare of the people of the City.
6. The PUD plan meets the PUD Intent and Purpose provision and all other PUD ordinance
provisions.
7. The PUD plan proposes a significant improvement to the parking lot and drive aisles.
8. The PUD plan proposes a new and unique use of pervious pavers.
And staff recommends approval of the Final Plan subject to the following conditions:
1. The plans prepared by mfra and Darwin Lindahl Architects, dated April 25, 2014, submitted
with the application shall become a part of this approval.
2. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Public Works
Department to Mark Grimes, Community Development Director, dated May 19, 2014, shall
become a part of this approval.
3. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Fire Department to
Mark Grimes, Community Development Director, dated May 19, 2014, shall become a part of
this approval.
4. Access to the newly created Lot 2 shall be maintained via a driveway easement.
5. The Final Plat shall include "P.U.D. No. 115" in its title.
6. A park dedication fee of$80,640, or 2% of the land value, shall be paid before Final Plat
approval.
7. All signage must meet the requirements of the City's Sign Code (Section 4.20).
8. This approval is subject to all other state, federal, and local ordinances, regulations, or laws
with authority over this development.
Attachments
• Location Map (1 page)
• Applicant's Narrative (3 pages)
• Unapproved Planning Commission Minutes dated May 28, 2014 (3 pages)
• Memo to the Planning Commission dated May 28, 2014 (7 pages)
• Memo from Public Works Department dated May 19, 2014 (4 pages)
• Memo from Fire Department dated May 19, 2014 (1 page)
• Renderings of the Site (2 pages)
• Site Plans dated April 25, 2014 (14 pages)
• Ordinance #518 Approval of Final Plan of Development Morrie's Golden Valley P.U.D. No. 115
Morrie's Automotive Group, Applicant (2 pages)
Recommended Action
Motion to adopt Ordinance #518, Approval of Final Plan of Development, Morrie's Golden Valley
PUD #115, Morrie's Automotive Group (Maserati & Bentley), Applicant.
I J-
7dg
Y
v Quebec Ave s � West Ring Pond
,- �
I itirel Ave h
f Subject Property:
1 , 7400 Wayzata Blvd.
a�.
� � Q
e,: a
• _r
Wayzata 51vd ..
: IrrierataCe tiwy 39�++�+««•'
Ui...Niui...... .............................
M O R R I E'S 7400 Wayzata Boulevard
Golden Valley,MN 55426
CADILLAC/SAAB phone 763-449-4200
fax 763-449-4271
BUY HAPPY"
morries.com
Morrie's Luxury Auto— Golden Valley"
Final PUD Application
7400 Wayzata Boulevard
Golden Valley, Minnesota
Proiect Narrative:
Introduction:
• Morrie's Automotive Group is proposing to amend the land use designation for their
existing property at 7400 Wayzata Boulevard to a Planned Unit Development (PUD).
General Project Scope:
• The purpose for creating a PUD is to allow Morrie's to develop the existing site as a
luxury automotive development. Currently Morrie's Cadillac/Saab is located on the site,
and Morrie's would like to construct another showroom facility that will house
additional high-end luxury automobile lines.
• Under the PUD, the current parcel will be platted into two lots, and each building will be
located on separate lots.
Site Design:
• The proposed location of the high-end luxury showroom facility is east of the current
Cadillac/Saab building, which is currently a vehicle display lot.
• Vehicle display will be located on the northeast portion of the site. Customer parking
for the proposed high-end luxury showroom facility will be located in front.
• No modification to the existing site lighting is anticipated.
Building Design:
• The proposed high-end luxury showroom building consists of a two-story structure, with
showrooms on both levels. Service write-up is located between the main level
showrooms. All service work for the high-end luxury vehicles will be performed in the
existing Cadillac/Saab service department.
• The construction type proposed to the new building is II-B, and will be fully sprinklered.
• The proposed exterior building materials consist of a combination of glass, aluminum
composite (ACM) rain-screen system, and face brick. The colors of the proposed
Morrie's Luxury Auto—Golden Valley
PUD Appication
April 25,2014
building materials will be of a lighter tone, which will blend with the existing building
colors.
• Building signage will consist of individual illuminated channel characters for verbiage,
and the manufacturer's logo mark will be a backlit cabinet sign.
• The two main showrooms will each have a separate entrance to their respective
showrooms.
Landscaping:
• Landscaping around the new facility will consist of a variety of foundation planting
around the building perimeter, a hedge along the east edge of the customer parking,
and several over-story shade trees at the northeast corner of the building.
• The sidewalk in front of the proposed showroom facility will be either a decorative
stamped concrete or pavers, which will match the sidewalks around the Cadillac/Saab
building.
• The total landscaped area (pervious surface) will increase from the current condition.
• New trees will be planted along the west side of the existing dealership building per
code.
• There currently are no trees located in the general area of the proposed development,
thus a Tree Preservation Plan is not required.
Grading & Drainage:
• Grading/drainage will be limited to the extent required around the proposed showroom
building. The general drainage direction will remain as currently exists, which is to the
southeast.
• The total hard surface (impervious surface) will decrease from the current condition.
Conclusion:
We believe this PUD request should be granted for the following reasons:
• The creation of this PUD will increase the land density within the 1-394 corridor, and
eliminate the view of the expansive display lot from Wayzata Boulevard/394.
• The proposed use is compatible with the adjacent businesses, and because of the nature
of the product sold, it is a destination point, and will not create an excessive amount of
traffic.
• The proposed building design and exterior building materials are high-end, and
complement the designs of the existing adjacent buildings.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Morrie's Luxury Auto—Golden Valley
PUD Appication
April 25,2014
• The proposed development reduces the total amount of impervious surfaces on that
site.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Morrie's Luxury Auto—Golden Valley
PUD Appication
April 25,2014
Regular Meeting of the
Golden Valley Planning Commission
May 28, 2014
A regular meeting of the Planning Co mission was held at the Golden Valley City Hall,
ncil Chambers, 7800 Golden Vall Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota, on Monday,
May 014. Vice Chair Cera called a meeting to order at 7 pm.
Those present Planning Commis ioners Baker, Cera, Sec, ° m and Waldhauser.
Also present was Co nity Develop ent Director M Imes, City Planner Jason
Zimmerman and Administra ' Assist nt Lisa an. Commissioners Boudreau-Landis
and Kluchka were absent.
1. Approval of Minut
April 28 14, Regular Plannin Commission Meeting
MO by Waldhauser, seconded by egelbaum and motion carried unanimously to
rove the April 28, 2014, minutes as submitted.
2. Informal Public Hearing — Final PUD Plan — Morrie's Automotive — 7400
Wayzata Blvd. — PUA 15
Applicant: Morrie's Automotive Group
Address: 7400 Wayzata Blvd.
Purpose: To allow for the addition of a new standalone dealership with
customer service support area within the existing parking lot.
Zimmerman explained that this is the Final PUD plan for the Morrie's Automotive Group
proposal to build a new dealership building within their existing parking lot. He stated that
Lot 1 will contain the current Cadillac dealership and will be 4.6 acres in size. Lot 2 will
be located in the southeast corner of the property, will contain the new Maserati &
Bentley dealership and will be 1 acre in size. He added that access to the proposed new
lot would be through an existing private, shared driveway along the south lot line.
Segelbaum referred to the comments in the staff report about the applicant's request for
a third pylon sign on the property. Zimmerman stated that the City sign ordinance allows
one pylon sign per lot so this proposal would be allowed to have two pylon signs.
Zimmerman discussed how the Final PUD proposal has changed since the Preliminary
PUD stage. He noted that the proposed building will be slightly larger, the proposed car
elevator has been relocated to the interior of the building, a covered service drive has
been added on the north side of the proposed building, windows have been added to the
east and west facades to match the front facade, additional trees have been added along
Pennsylvania Avenue and a bicycle rack has been added to the front of the building. He
referred to the parking requirements and stated that the City Code requires 217 parking
spaces for this use. The applicant is proposing 255 spaces for the Cadillac building and
Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission
May 28, 2014
Page 2
28 spaces for the Maserati and Bentley building for a total of 283 parking spaces. Cera
asked if the parking requirements apply to each lot or to the overall property. Zimmerman
said the parking requirements are considered for the entire PUD, not individual lots.
Peter Coyle, Larkin Hoffman, representing the Applicant, stated that they were happy
they could make the changes the Planning Commission recommended during the
Preliminary Plan review because they feel they now have a better plan. He said they will
review the Sign Code requirements with staff during the building permit phase. He
referred to the City Engineer's memo regarding sidewalks and said he is concerned
about the language requiring a sidewalk connection south to the pedestrian bridge. He
asked if part of the required park dedication fees could be used to pay for that
connection.
Segelbaum asked Coyle if he thinks there is the ability to find a compromise regarding
the signage and asked if they need to have three pylon signs. Coyle said they do need to
have three pylon signs and he could argue that the existing two pylon signs should be
"grandfathered-in."
Cera opened the public hearing. Hearing and seeing no one wishing to comment, Cera
closed the public hearing.
Waldhauser said she is pleased with the changes the applicant has made to their plans.
She added that the landscaping, stormwater improvements and sidewalk are all good
assets and she will defer to staff to negotiate the signage issues.
Baker said he is curious about the sidewalk connection issue and asked staff if they
know the costs involved. Grimes said he would have the City Engineer address that
issue in further detail before this proposal goes to the City Council.
MOVED by Baker, seconded by Segelbaum and motion carried unanimously to
recommend approval of the Final PUD Plan for PUD #115 Morrie's Automotive Group
subject to the following findings and conditions.-
Findings
onditions:Findings
1. The PUD plan is tailored to the specific characteristics of the site and achieves a
higher quality of site planning and design than generally expected under conventional
provisions of the ordinance.
2. The PUD plan preserves and protects substantial desirable portions of the site's
characteristics, open space and sensitive environmental features including steep
slopes, trees, scenic views, creeks, wetlands, and open waters.
3. The PUD plan includes efficient and effective use (which includes preservation) of the
land.
4. The PUD Plan results in development compatible with adjacent uses and is consistent
with the Comprehensive Plan and redevelopment plans and goals.
5. The PUD plan is consistent with preserving and improving the general health, safety
and general welfare of the people of the City.
Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission
May 28, 2014
Page 3
6. The PUD plan meets the PUD Intent and Purpose provision and all other PUD ordinance
provisions.
Conditions:
1. The plans prepared by mfra, dated 4/25/14 submitted with the application shall
become a part of this approval.
2. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Public
Works Department to Mark Grimes, Community Development Director, dated May
19, 2014, shall become a part of this approval.
3. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Fire
Department to Mark Grimes, Community Development Director, dated May 19,
2014, shall become a part of this approval.
4. Access to the newly created Lot 2 shall be maintained via a driveway easement.
5. The Final Plat shall include "P.U.D. No. 115" in its title.
6. A park dedication fee of$80,640, or 2% of the land value, shall be paid before
Final Plat approval.
7. All signage must meet the requirements of the City's Sign Code (Section 4.20).
8. This approval is subject to all other state, federal, and local ordinances,
regulations, or laws with authority over this development.
Informal Public Hearing — Fina PUD Plan — Tennant Company — 701 Lilac
Drive North — PU-114
licant: Tennant Company
Addre 701 Lilac Drive Nort
Purpose: To allow for the con 'olidation of multiple prop s into one parcel to
e ble inter-campu connections.
Due to the lack of a quoru this item as tabled to 1h6 June 9, 2014, Planning
Commission meeting.
4. Informal Public Hearing — itinary PUD Plan — Marie's Woods — 7200 and
7218 Harold Avenue — PU-1
f
Applicant: Peter Knae�,b'ie
Address: 720 fend 7218 H rold Aven
f
Purpose: o allow for the r configuration 0hhe existing two single family
properties into a ew six-lot, single N\H ,
elopment
Zimmer n explained the applicant request to develople family homes on two
existi single family lots at 7200 a 'd 7218 Harold Avenferred to a site plan of
the operties and noted that two o the proposed homesave direct access onto
rold Avenue and the other four h mes would share two driveways.
city 0f,
gulden � MEMORANDUM
Planning g Deartment� P
763-593-8095/763-593-8109(fax)
Date: May 28, 2014
To: Golden Valley Planning Commission
From: Jason Zimmerman, City Planner
Subject: Informal Public Hearing— Final PUD Plan for Morrie's Automotive
(Maserati & Bentley) PUD No. 115 —7400 Wayzata Boulevard — Morrie's
Automotive Group, Applicant
Background
Morrie's Automotive Group is seeking approval of a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Permit to
develop an additional, stand-alone, dealership within the existing parking lot at 7400 Wayzata
Boulevard. A new lot would be created in the southeast corner of the property. The site currently
contains the Morrie's Cadillac dealership; it would be joined by a Maserati and Bentley dealership
in the new building. The Preliminary PUD Plan was reviewed by the Planning Commission on March
24, 2014, and approved by the City Council on April 17, 2014.
The property is zoned 1-394 Mixed Use" and guided for long-term "Mixed Use" on the General
Land Use Plan map. The total lot area is 5.6 acres; it is bounded by Highway 394 to the south and
Pennsylvania Avenue South to the west. The adjacent property to the east contains an Infiniti
dealership and the adjacent property to the north contains the Liberty Carton factory.
Summary of Proposal
The proposed PUD would allow the Applicant to subdivide the existing property and create two
lots. Lot 1, containing the Cadillac dealership, would be 4.6 acres; Lot 2, containing the new
Maserati and Bentley dealership, would be 1 acre. The new building would be located on the
southeast portion of the property and would have parking both to the south and north.
The new building would have a footprint of 11,640 square feet and total square footage of
20,986. The first floor would contain two showrooms as well as sales offices and workspaces. A
revised floor plan now shows the car elevator incorporated into the interior of the building to
allow cars to be brought up to an additional pre-owned showroom on the second floor.
The front (south) facade of the building would consist mostly of a curtain wall of clear glass with
illuminated signage and a clear glass overhead door. The other three sides of the building would
mainly consist of white aluminum panels with banks of windows facing east and west. A wall of
windows on the north side of the building would shelter a covered service drive.
New landscaping would be installed around the foundation of the building and along the parking
areas and trees would be added to the east side of the new lot. Six new Honey Locusts would be
planted along Pennsylvania Avenue to the west. Overall, the amount of impervious surfaces on
the lot would be reduced slightly.
After the subdivision, the Cadillac dealership would be left with 255 parking spaces. The new
Maserati and Bentley dealerships would share 28 parking spaces for a total of 283 spaces on-site.
Code requires a minimum of only 217 spaces for these uses, resulting in an excess of 66 spaces.
A private road runs along the south side of the property and provides access not only to the
Applicant's property, but to other businesses further to the east via a driveway easement. The
new Lot 2 will require use of this road and the existing curb cut into the Cadillac dealership lot.
J k V i .t _
500 501 500 501 500 1501 421
520 521 7700 521 520 521 510 7400 7100
Afv �k
600 611 7701 wp ;e+w s ..s. ;r. tt; • _ _
700
642 623 648 J 675
� 7425 Laurel Ave y
716 723 716 710 705
o
� c
32 743 732
705 Pennsylvania Ave S o 850
' 825 750
2
0 • 815 814 c,
820 GS _. cD z ,
840
3 E 843 830 -•^� '
P) 900
915 950 f{ _
(tj 904
.. 901
1033 1030 { 1000
1041 1040 1040
1051 1050 * to 7400 _ 7000
1060 7630 ^ 1 7200 7100
_
Hwy.394
M
jet"
@ _
�.�!`•. ,.. '.,a^` 1 i.,: (` _ 3,k1�4' f�. , .'yam.... ��q' ! .. .kI 1 I f _.l l,.l.
14
` '�4, liF1 �" ,. ,. .�*' � � j i f� !i !.. � t•i! 1l i.!!!•Hf ��:! F; • !"s
Yom+
PUD 115 - Site Map
Land Use and Zoning Considerations
The property was guided for long-term Mixed Use development in the Comprehensive Plan in
2008. At that time, it was also zoned 1-394 Mixed Use." Although the 1-394 Mixed Use Zoning
District requires a Conditional Use Permit for outdoor auto sales, a PUD would allow the
development to occur without this requirement.
The 1-394 Mixed Use Zoning District regulates Dimensional Standards, the Density and Mix of Uses,
and various Development Standards. The Code allows the City to approve alternative approaches
that achieve the same design objectives. As a PUD, the City can also offers flexibility from the
regular zoning requirements in order to achieve a better development.
The following table summarizes how closely the requirements of the 1-394 Mixed Use Zoning
District are met under the current proposal:
I-394 Mixed Use District Morrie's Maserati & Bentley
Dimensional Standards
Front yard setback, building No minimum 88'
Side yard setback, building 10' 15.5'
Rear yard setback, building 10' 35'
Front yard setback, parking 15' 26'
Side yard setback, parking 15' NA
Rear yard setback, parking 15' 10' with no landscaping
Maximum height 3 stories 2 stories
Impervious coverage 65% maximum Overall: 86% (down from
87%)
Lot 2: 80% (down from 89%)
Density and Mix of Uses
Required mix of uses At least two uses when site is Single use
over one acre
Required open space 15% when site is over one Unknown
acre
Floor area ratio 0.6 maximum 0.48
Development Standards
Building placement Building close to primary Parking use between building
street; parking use in the and primary street
interior of the site
Building design Facades over 30' divided Yes
visually
Building tops defined through Yes
architectural details
Defined base, middle, and top Some
with human scale elements
Transparency Window and door openings at Yes
least 60% of length and 30%
of facade facing primary
street
Windows located minimum of No (floor to ceiling windows)
3' above grade
Door height maximum of 8' Yes
Window and door or balcony Yes
openings at least 15% of
upper story, side, and rear
facades
Building entrances Entrances provided onto Yes
primary street
Entrances lighted and defined Yes
with architectural details
Building materials Exterior wall finish of glass, Yes
stucco, natural stone, brick,
architectural concrete, non-
corrugated metal, or an
equivalent or better
At least 20% of the facade None
facing primary street Kasota
stone or other indigenous
dolomitic limestone
Up to 15%of exterior wall More than 15% aluminum
may be wood, metal, EIFS, or cladding
equivalent when used as trim
All facades shall be Yes
constructed with materials of
equivalent levels of quality to
the front facade, except when
not visible to public
Building colors Bright or primary colors Yes
limited to 15% of all street-
facing facades and roofs
Parking location Located to the side or rear of 22 parking spaces in the front
buildings; parking within front of the building; parking
yard setbacks between between building and street
building and street limited to 62' deep
maximum depth of 40'
Parking screening Screened from streets by 5' 26' wide landscaped strip but
wide landscaped strip no screening
Screening shall consist of None
masonry wall, berm, or hedge
a minimum of 3.5' and
maximum of 4' and not less
than 50%opaque year-round
1 deciduous tree per 50' of Yes
landscaped frontage
Pedestrian circulation Sidewalks required along all New sidewalk along
street frontages Pennsylvania; none along the
private road
6' sidewalks along all fagades Sidewalk along south facade
that abut public parking areas but not north
Public art Encouraged None
Public Works and Fire Safety Considerations
As is standard practice for development proposals, plans for this proposal were reviewed by the
City's Public Works Department to ensure the site can be adequately served by public utilities and
that traffic issues are resolved. A memorandum from the Public Works Department that addresses
sanitary sewer and water services, stormwater management, and tree preservation and
landscaping is attached.
The Fire Department reviewed this proposal to ensure that buildings are equipped with fire
protection systems and that adequate emergency vehicle access is achieved on the site. A
memorandum from the Fire Department that addresses fire hydrants, water supply, and No
Parking Fire Lane signs is attached.
Modifications from Preliminary PUD Plan
The building footprint and floor plans were revised between the Preliminary and Final PUD Plans.
The car elevator that was the north of the building has now been incorporated into the interior of
the building. In addition, a covered service drive was added to the north.
Rain gardens are now proposed to be constructed in the landscaped buffer between the front
parking area and the private drive to the south. As requested by the Planning Commission, trees
have been added to the plans along Pennsylvania Avenue.
New to this plan is a third pylon sign proposed to be constructed in addition to the existing two
pylon signs. The City's sign ordinance does not permit more than one pylon sign per lot in the 1-394
Mixed Use Zoning District.
Justification for Consideration as a PUD
The PUD process is an optional method of regulating land use in order to permit flexibility in uses
allowed, setbacks, height, parking requirements, and number of buildings on a lot. Staff has
determined that this application qualifies as a PUD because it achieves the following standards
established in City Code:
• Achieves a high quality of site planning, design, landscaping, and building materials which
are compatible with the existing and planned land uses.
• Encourages creativity and flexibility in land development.
• Encourage efficient and effective use of land, open space, streets, utilities, and other public
facilities.
• Achieve development consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
• Achieve development consistent with the City's redevelopment plans and goals.
In order to be approved as a PUD, the City must be able to make the following findings:
1. Quality Site Planning. The PUD plan is tailored to the specific characteristics of the site and
achieves a higher quality of site planning and design than generally expected under
conventional provisions of the ordinance.
2. Preservation. The PUD plan preserves and protects substantial desirable portions of the
site's characteristics, open space and sensitive environmental features including steep
slopes, trees, scenic views, creeks, wetlands, and open waters.
3. Efficient— Effective. The PUD plan includes efficient and effective use (which includes
preservation) of the land.
4. Compatibility. The PUD Plan results in development compatible with adjacent uses and is
consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and redevelopment plans and goals.
5. General Health. The PUD plan is consistent with preserving and improving the general
health, safety and general welfare of the people of the City.
6. Meets Requirements. The PUD plan meets the PUD Intent and Purpose provision and all
other PUD ordinance provisions.
Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of the Final Plan for Morrie's Automotive (Maserati & Bentley) PUD
No. 115, subject to the following conditions:
1. The plans prepared by mfra, dated 4/25/14 submitted with the application shall become a
part of this approval.
2. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Public Works
Department to Mark Grimes, Community Development Director, dated May 19, 2014, shall
become a part of this approval.
3. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Fire Department
to Mark Grimes, Community Development Director, dated May 19, 2014, shall become a
part of this approval.
4. Access to the newly created Lot 2 shall be maintained via a driveway easement.
5. The Final Plat shall include "P.U.D. No. 115" in its title.
6. A park dedication fee of$80,640, or 2%of the land value, shall be paid before Final Plat
approval.
7. All signage must meet the requirements of the City's Sign Code (Section 4.20).
8. This approval is subject to all other state, federal, and local ordinances, regulations, or laws
with authority over this development.
Attachments
Location Map (1 page)
Applicant's Narrative (3 pages)
Memo from the Fire Department dated May 19, 2014 (1 page)
Memo from the Public Works Department dated May 19, 2014 (4 pages)
Renderings of Proposed New Building (2 pages)
Final Plat (1 page)
Site Plans (13 pages)
city 0f
go 1 d e nMEMORANDUM
valley Public Works Department
763-593-8030/763-593-3988(fax)
,.f xf?'; MM4°s':s: `W;
Date: May 19, 2014//
To: Mark Grimes, Director of Planning and Development
From: Jeff Oliver, PE, City Engineer
Eric Eckman, Public Works Specialist
Subject: Review of Final Plans— Planned Unit Development#115
Morrie's Automotive— Maserati and Bentley (7400 Wayzata Boulevard)
Public Works staff has reviewed the Final PUD Plans submitted by Morrie's Automotive Group
(Developer) for construction of a new automobile dealership on a portion of the existing Cadillac
dealership site. The proposed redevelopment, called Morrie's Luxury Auto, is located on the
property known as 7400 Wayzata Boulevard, which is east of Pennsylvania Avenue South and
north of Interstate 394. This memorandum discusses issues identified during the Public Works
review that must be addressed prior to final plat approval. The comments contained in this
review are based on the plans submitted to the City on April 25, 2014.
Site Plan
This redevelopment includes the creation of a new parcel in the southeast corner of the existing
Cadillac dealership for the construction of a two-level, 20,986 square foot automobile showroom
and customer service building. A portion of the existing Cadillac parking lot will be removed to
accommodate the new building and associated parking facilities. Landscape improvements are
proposed along with a decrease in overall impervious surface area.
The City's street system in the vicinity of this project is adequate to accommodate the vehicle
trips generated by the development. The existing Cadillac parking lot will be modified to allow
for construction of the new dealership and there are no changes proposed to the site circulation
within the PUD or access to the City's street system. The Driveway Easement (Document
1033214) which provides the car dealership to the east of this site access to Pennsylvania Avenue
South may need to be modified to ensure that the new parcel has permanent access to the City's
street system. The Developer must provide copies of this easement to the City.
The City's Comprehensive Transportation Plan identifies a future sidewalk on the east side of
Pennsylvania Avenue South extending from Wayzata Boulevard to Laurel Avenue. The Developer
must construct the portion of this sidewalk that is adjacent to this PUD, including the connection
G:\Developments-Private\Morrie's Auto Maserati PUD 115\FinaIPUDReview_051914.docx
south to the pedestrian bridge which crosses 1-394. There are curb cuts in the existing driveways
serving the Cadillac dealership that may accommodate the placement of the sidewalk. Final plans
for the sidewalk must be submitted to the City along with a Right-of-Way Management permit
application. The concrete sidewalk must meet City standards and Americans with Disabilities Act
(ADA) guidelines. The City will own and maintain the sidewalk following completion of
construction. The Developer must post a financial security as a guarantee that the sidewalk will
be constructed in a timely manner and in accordance with City standards.
Preliminary Plat
This development includes subdividing the existing property into two new parcels. Lot 1 will
contain the existing Cadillac dealership and Lot 2 will be home to the new Maserati and Bentley
showroom.
A proposed final plat was not submitted with the Final PUD plans. However, based upon the
preliminary plat submitted earlier, the Developer has included the dedication of right-of-way
along Interstate 394 and Pennsylvania Avenue South consistent with the City's recommendation.
However, depending on the alignment of the proposed sidewalk along Pennsylvania Avenue
South, the Developer may have to dedicate additional right-of-way or possibly a walkway
easement. The proposed final plat must include the dedication of drainage and utility easements
consistent with the City's Subdivision Ordinance. In addition, since the development is adjacent
to Interstate 394, MnDOT must review the plat and may provide additional comments.
Utility Plan
The City's water system that provides service to these properties has adequate capacity to
accommodate the proposed redevelopment.
The proposed redevelopment is within a sanitary sewershed that is tributary to a system capacity
issue near the intersection of Laurel Avenue and Turners Crossroad. The City's 24-inch diameter
sanitary sewer is effectively at capacity in this location and there is minimal capacity available for
future redevelopment along the 1-394 corridor unless inflow and infiltration can be reduced
throughout the sewershed. The City is putting plans in place to reduce the inflow and infiltration
in the City's portion of the sanitary sewer system over the next several years. In addition, the
proposed use at this location is a low generator of wastewater flow and will contribute minimal
flows. Therefore, connection to the City's sanitary sewer system should be acceptable as
proposed.
The Developer has demonstrated that extension of sanitary sewer and water services is possible,
as shown in the Utility Plan. The proposed sewer and water services for the new building will be
extended into the site from the existing City facilities within Pennsylvania Avenue. The Developer
will be required to obtain Sewer and Water Permits, and a Right-of-Way Management Permit for
installation of these services.
The Developer will own and be responsible for the sanitary sewer from the point of connection to
the City sewer to the building. The Developer will also own and be responsible for the
maintenance of the water service from the new valve, at the point of connection to the City's
main, to the building. The City will own and maintain the valve at the point of connection.
G:\Developments-Private\Morrie's Auto Maserati PUD 115\FinaIPUDReview_051914.docx
The Preliminary Utility Plan submitted for review does not indicate any structural piling to
support the sanitary sewer and water services. The soils in the vicinity of this property have
resulted in utility service issues on adjacent properties that appear to be the result of soil
settlement. The Developer must submit information from a soils engineer regarding the need for
pile support of the utility services before final plat consideration.
The existing and new building within this PUD must comply with the City's Inflow and Infiltration
Ordinance. The existing building has been inspected and is in the process of receiving its
Certificate of Inflow and Infiltration Compliance. A Certificate of Compliance must be obtained for
the new Maserati/Bentley building prior to occupancy.
Stormwater Management
This proposed redevelopment is within the Sweeney Lake sub-watershed of the Bassett Creek
Watershed and is therefore subject to the review and comment of the Bassett Creek Watershed
Management Commission (BCWMC). Due to the scope of redevelopment, the project is not
subject to the BCWMC requirements for water quality. However, the plans will be reviewed for
erosion and sediment control best management practices.
Sweeney Lake is listed as an impaired water for nutrients (phosphorus) by the Minnesota
Pollution Control Agency. Review by the City and BCMWC will include an evaluation for
compliance with the Sweeney Lake Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Implementation Plan.
The plans submitted by the Developer include the reduction of impervious surface area
(approximately 3,500 square feet), which is recognized as an effective best management practice.
In addition, the Developer has proposed the construction of a vegetated swale and two
bioretention basins to assist in the reduction of stormwater volume, phosphorus, and total
suspended solids from the site. The City recommends that storm sewer manhole 1 (STMH 1 on
the plans) be designed with a 4-foot sump and a SAFL baffle for sediment capture and removal.
All existing and proposed storm sewer facilities that are part of this development will be
owned and maintained by the Property Owner. The Developer will be required to enter into a
Maintenance Agreement with the City for all stormwater quality treatment facilities and storm
sewer facilities installed as part of the development.
This PUD is also subject to the City's Stormwater Management Ordinance. The City must approve
the Stormwater Management Plans prior to submittal to the BCWMC. In addition, the PUD is
subject to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's NPDES Construction Permit. A copy of this
permit must be obtained by the Developer and provided to the City, prior to issuance of any
permits to begin work on site.
Tree Preservation Plan and Landscape Plan
This PUD is subject to the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance and Minimum Landscape Standards.
There are no existing trees within the redevelopment area and therefore no tree preservation
permit is required.
G:\Developments-Private\Morrie's Auto Maserati PUD 115\FinaIPUDReview_051914.docx
The plans submitted with this application include a Landscape Plan. Prior to approval of the final
plat and PUD development agreement, the Developer will be required to post a financial security
as a guarantee that the landscaping will survive the two-year warranty period. Therefore, the
Developer must submit to the City an estimate of the cost to furnish and install the landscape
materials.
Summary and Recommendations
Public Works staff recommends approval of the Preliminary Plans for Morrie's Automotive PUD
115, subject to the comments contained in this review, summarized as follows:
1. The Developer must construct a sidewalk along Pennsylvania Avenue South, and submit a
financial security to ensure proper construction, as discussed in this review.
2. The Developer must submit a proposed final plat for review and approval.
3. Approval is subject to the review and comments of the Minnesota Department of
Transportation.
4. The Driveway Access Easement between the two adjacent automotive dealerships must
be reviewed and be modified as necessary to allow the new automotive dealership access
to Pennsylvania Avenue.
5. The Developer must submit a geotechnical analysis on the need for structural piling to
support the sanitary sewer and water services to the new building.
6. An Inflow and Infiltration Certificate of Compliance must be obtained for the new
Maserati/Bentley building prior to occupancy.
7. Storm sewer manhole 1 (STMH 1 on the plans) should be designed with a 4-foot sump and
SAFL baffle to assist in sediment capture and removal.
8. The Developer must enter into a Maintenance Agreement for the stormwater quality
treatment facilities and storm sewer facilities being constructed as part of the PUD.
9. The Developer must obtain Stormwater Management, Right-of-Way Management, Sewer
and Water, and any other permits that may be required for development of this site.
10. The Developer must submit a security for the landscaping on site, as discussed in this
review.
Approval is also subject to the comments of the City Attorney, other City staff, and other
agencies. Please feel free to call the Public Works Department if you have any questions
regarding this matter.
C: Jeannine Clancy, Director of Public Works
Bert Tracy, Public Works Maintenance Manager
Mitch Hoeft, PE, Utilities Engineer
Mark Ray, PE, Street Maintenance Supervisor
Al Lundstrom, Park Maintenance Supervisor and City Forester
Kelley Janes, Utilities Supervisor
Joe Fox, Water Resources Engineer
John Crelly, Fire Chief
Jason Zimmerman, City Planner
Jerry Frevel, Building Official
Sue Virnig, Finance Director
G:\Developments-Private\Morrie's Auto Maserati PUD 115\FinaIPUDReview_051914.docx
't
I V of 10
� � K � � ���'� ���� �������u�|�w��0�1 �� ��� 0��
�� � �/�Q�.� � �m� ���0��.�����_������^��� �~���/
valley Fire Department
763-593-8079 / 763'593-8098 (fax)
Date: May 19, I014
To: Mark Grimes, Director ofCommunity Development
Cc: Jeff Oliver, City Engineer
From: ]ohn [re|/y, Fire Chief
Subject: Fina/ PUD — 74OOWayzata Blvd — Mnrrie'sAutomotive (Maserati & Bentley)
/ have reviewed the application for the Final PUD application for K8orrie'sAutonnotive (Maserati &
Bentley) located at 7400 Wayzata Blvd. Most of the comments that | presented in the March 14,
2014 preliminary PUD letter were addressed but a couple still remain. Listed below are my
comments.
l. The installation and maintenance ofany fire hydrant shall be in accordance with the City of
Golden Valley Public Works Department. Private fire hydrants located on private property shall
be identified with a red paint color. The installation of fire hydrant shall be within 150 feet of
any fire department sprinkler connection or standpipe connection located on the building. City
Policy and Minnesota State Fire Code Section 9.3.3.7. Provide a fire hydrant within 150 feet of
the building fire department connection (FQQ.
Z. The fire department connection (FDC) shall be located within 150 feet of the hydrant. The plan
does not indicate a location for the FDC. Please the FDC location on future utility plans
3. The installation of No Parking Fire Lane signs shall be installed in accordance with the Golden
Valley City Ordinance. A 20 foot wide access road shall be provided and maintained starting at
the service drive, continue north along the west side of the new building and continuing north
and then west mut to Pennsylvania Avenue, Fire lane signs "may" need to be added to ensure
the 20foot wide road isalways accessible.
If you have any questions, please contact me at 763-593-8065, or e-mail
r
�:a T
fF f
I
�t 1
� 1
i
i
i r
C
J,
i
I
,�ay�'
f�4
ir
vs
�r
f �
u
& �f
11
N� �� ,
i
■ �' ` F
la P
acnf ra
148M 26th As N,Ste 140
Ptpnw ,Minnesota 55447
M 476.6010 mbphaoe
17631476.8532 facsimile
Site Development Plans Client wwwmlLe.com
MORRIE'S
for AUTOMOTIVE
GROUP12520 WAYZATA BOULEVARD
orrie ' s u x u r u o MINNETONKA,MN 55305
Project
Golden Valley, Minnesota MORRIE'S
LUXURY AUTO
Presented by:
Location
Morrie 's Automotive Group GOLDEN
VALLEY, MN
7400 WAYZATA BLVD.
Certification
In—by—fy that this plan,specification or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed
proess
fional ENGINEER under the laws of the state
of Minnesota.
Brady D.Busselman
100 Registration No.44579 Date:02/21/2014
If applicable,contact us for a wet signed copy of this
P
lan wM1icM1 is available upon repuest at MFRA,Inc.,
Plymouth,MN oHi.
CONSULTANT CONTACT LIST: SHEET INDEX Summary
55 SHEET DESCRIPTION Designed:BDB/GDA Drawn:/MT
CIVIL ENGINEER
Approved:eDB Book Page:
DEVELOPER/OWNER MFRA INC. Q W CLOS TITLE SHEET Phase:PRELIMINARY Initial Issued:02/21/20E4
MORRI E'S AUTOMOTIVE G ROUP 1480028TH AVENUE,SUITE 140 z> 1/1 ALTA/ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEY
12520 WAYZATA BLVD PLYMOUTH,MN 55447 Q Q Revision History
03.01 SITE PLAN No.DateB
MINNETONKA,MN 55305 TEL 763-476-6010 > Y Submittal/Revision
TEL 952-544-0376 FAX 763-476-8532 MARKET ST C4.01 GRADING&DRAINAGE&EROSION CONTROL PLAN A 03/13/19 1MT updated Survey&
CONTACT: LYNN ROBSON CONTACT: BRADY D.BUSSELMAN,PE Z C6.01 UTILITY PLAN smrmwater Management Revisions
SITE a 04/25/14 1MFinal PUD Plan,
a * Q C7.01 DETAILS
394 c7.oz DETAILS
169
�w
ARCHITECT SURVEYOR >
DARWINLINDAHL ARCHITECTS MFRA INC.
4124 QUEBEC AVE N,SUITE 106 14800 28TH AVENUE,SUITE 140
MINNEAPOLIS,MN 55427 PLYMOUTH,MN 55447
TEL 763-560-0448 TEL 763-476-6010
FAX 763-560-0441 FAX 763-476-8532
CONTACT: DARWIN LINDAHL,PA CONTACT: MARCUS F.HAMPTON,LS
N.T.S. Sheet Title
TITLE SHEET
GEOTECHNICAL
BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION
1826 BUERKLE ROAD
ST.PAUL,MN 55110 VICINITY MAP
TEL 651-487-3245
FAX 651-487-1812 NO SCALE
CONTACT: STEVE MARTIN,PE
Sheet No. Revision
C1.01 6
Project No.MOR19974
LEGEND
�- Ica==etas. 4 I FOUND MONUMENT CI—I�SANITARY
SE ==--- SETBACEASEMEK
T LINE
LINE
mI 0SET MONUMENT p-D--0s SANITARY SEWER - SETBACK LINE ra
N1y Od7lFR OF THE BE 1/4 OF N LINE OF THE SE 1/4 Of THE MARKED LS 47481 �-DD-0 STORM SEWER —6— RESTRICTED ACCESS
�I z- 1/4 SEC S.L 117,R 21 .-NW 1/4 SEC.S.T.117,R 21 ®ELECTRIC METER [1--l>--<FLARED END SECTION CONCRETE CURB
-- -- -- #LIGHT C, UE'-❑p ELECTRIC TRANSFORM __---- BUILDING LINE jg9 yryryl1��i11111gtlN6AERl�
NO.412 F� I 1 ER
EXISTING BUILDING /I �AIR CONDITIONER �IT-p TELEPHONE PEDESTAL -- BUILDING CANOPY
I. o - - NORTH t-gGUYANCHOR woe- i GAS METER BITUMINOUS SURFACE 1460026th Ave.N..Ste 140
I crs u[1ms - -- - - - - - - - _ 0 40 80 `1 HANDICAP STALL —5 OVERHEAD WIREiiiii CONCRETE SURFACE Rymouth.MII1neBma 55447
R UTllltt POLE CHAIN LINK FENCE LANDSCAPE SURFACE V63 476.6010 Telephona
i PROPERTY ID 05-117-21-24-0002 SCALE IN FEET OST IRON FENCE /64476.6532 facsimile
D
ADDRESS 701 PENNSYLVANIA AVE 5 o I a SIGN x— WIRE FENCE DECIDUOUS TREE www.mtm.com
" OWNER:UBERtt DIVERSIFIED IND INC e 1 —o— WOOD FENCE
- � CONIFEROUS TREE I I Client 4___ � —389398 W�B3.5�_ Sdo-oo
YY SURVEY NOTES
PROPERTY ID.05-117-21-23-0055 '- _
30 D 86 t with an assumed hearing of N05'3844"E for the West line
ADDRESS:840'PENNSYLVANIA AVE 5 Bases I i 1 The bearing system is based on the Hennep n County coordinate system,NA 83139 Adjust). g
OWNER:HIGHLAND BANK I m of the SE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 0f Section 5,Township 117,Range 21 Automotive
I Morries
_w � I
BITUMINOUS SURFACE 2 The vert cal datum is based on NAVD88 The or ginatmg bench marks are WINNETKA RM 1 and 2789 AV,both referenced from the MnDOT Geodet c
� n
� � Database
1
Group
- 8 BENCHMARK#1
`_ I S' nomn' I TNH located approzmately 140 feet northwesterly of the southwest corner of binding(across Pennsylvana Avenue).
I I 1 '$ I Elev. 890.62
li LUZZ/ J N
BEhCHMAR.I
WN
I gaTNH located prox ma e y140 feet southwesterly of nohwest corner of building(acrossPennsylvania Avenue).
921vj
-- - -138 6- - _ F 3 Subject property's address is 7400 Wayzata Blvd.,Golden Valley,MN 55426,Its propertyidentification number s 05-117-21-24-0001.
1,
_
vxcuuu 4 This survey was performed under the cover of a significant amount of snow.The surveyor makes no guarantee that all visible mprovements are shown.
IIX1049____
PRO PER TY ID:15,;1l -pzf-23-0004 >I' - . ._ r I I -SUBJECT PROPERTY Morries Cadillac
ADDRESS:7600 WAYZdTA BLVD I.
OWNER:ADVANCE NAYSIC INC - OL'
II Description from title[ommi[men[: Saab
Parcell
That part of the fplowi ng described property lyi ng westerly of a line drawn from a poi nt In the southerly Ii ne of sad property,d sta nt 42.57 feet East of the
Southwest corner t hereof to a point I,the West line of said property,distant 2G4.87 feet South of the Northwest corner thereof,that part of the Southeast
I \ = I Quarter of the Northwest Quarter lyi ng west of the East 10 acres thereof,and Southerly of a line drawn from a point I,the Westerly line of satl Tract,d sta nt
_- - -- / ,-- 588 feet Southerly from the Northwest corner thereof,as measured along sad Westerly line from the Northwest corner of said Tract,to a pont on the
\/ Easterly line of said Tract,distant 585 feet Southerly,as measured along said Easterly line from the Northeast comer of said Tract,except the westerly 500 I ` - �--138.1 I feet,front and rear,of the above described property,Section 5,Township 117,Range 21. location
Parcel `,
\ 'g • , YQi I All ofthe followng descrbed Tract The Westerly 500 feet front and rear of the followng descrbed tract of property to-it:that pan ofthe Southeast Golden YalleY
.A
quarter of the Northwest Quarterly ng West of the East 10 acres thereof and Southerly of a ne drawn from a pont on the Westerly line of ser d Tract,distant 1
v \ 7�6�
8 588 feet Southerly from the Northwestcorner thereof,(as measured along sad westerly line from the Northwest corner of sad Tract),too pontontheMsEasterly line of ser tl Tract,d Stant 585 feet Southerly as measured along sad Easterly ne from the Northeast corner of sad Tract,Secton 5,Townsh p 117,
R Ran 21,exce Ichor rtwhichles Easter( fol ne tlrawn from, tin the Northlne of satl rt,distant 165 feet West of the Northeast corner
z fie Pin Da prope y' Poln grope ythereofto a t n the East ne of ser d Stant 204 8]feet South of the Northeast corner thereofBI � SURFACEu ' O w Hen e p PCounty,M nnesotatl rt Torrens Certificate No.1190625
EXISTING BUILDING QReferent,Title Comm t Prop ty 35585(PRO FORMA),datetl 6/1/2012,thatStewarta saGuarantyCompany has prowid S us,cti the following comments on
PROPERTY ID:05-117 21-23»0058-- - y - easements etc,thatthe property s subject to n Schedule 8,Sect on 1 thereof us ng[he same number ng system as'n satl Sect on 1.EXception Items No's.
ADDRESS:1040 PENNSYLVANIA AVE S I 1.3 and 9-11 are not Survey related Items.
OWNER:NW BELL TEI EPHONE',CO I i / �rl'T. - y2 4 Easement for hi hwa favor of the State of Minnesota,as created n document dated January 18,1940,filed April11,1940,as Document No.
® _ 109.8- Ca' g opurposes,in
w I. C 155672 Eaaememiaghgwnangirve~. Certification
4D UE s I ♦_ I Sisal
5.hlts State
Minnesota,
including easemeasementand easement to erect and maintain temporary snow fences upon lands atllacentto
1 Y m g y,taken nal n CertCertificate datedA pr 30,1958 fled Jul 7,1958,as Doc.ment No 562329.Easement is shown on survey
highway,
I®
W I h I INy r1' 6.Easement for street,road and utility purposes,in favor of the Village, Cry, n
age,now ,of Golden Valley,as created- document dated May 25,1965,filed May
^ P s} 26,1965,as Document No 808689 Easement is shown on survey.
PROPERTY ID:05-117-21-23-0
ADORESS:7550 WAYZATA BLVD 115] ( yl l4� 7n Terms and conditions of and easements contained nEasement,dated April 19,1972,fled June 6,1972,as Document No 1033214.Easement is shown
OWNER:LORRAINE D MEYER I\' ;�JjJ = o survey.
8.The right of I access to Trunk Highway No 394 was taken by State of M nnema n Final Certificate f led September 2,1993,as Document No 2417782.
I ,
Shown on survey.
IT
or
a$ - t ------ 2 I "TABLE A"NOTES
$z 1 1 4 /DRfVEWAY EASEMENT. m
$ 1 - > L- 'PER DOC.N0.10 2144 I i I I 3. The subject property es within Flood Plan Zone X,per FEMA,FIRM Map Nos.2705300332E and 27053CO351E datetl 9/2/2004.
PROPERTY ID:OS-11]-2123 0059 eDq _ _ -- Summary
ADDRESS:7500 WAYZATA BLVD ° �w - 0,-* 1
ONNER:LORRAfNE D MEYER $I m - 1 - - 1 `,/L�L[�-! 'N i �I 4. Th fthe subject rt 8592 Acres or 374,2575 Feet.
W CANOPY c --- '- n RETAINING. IYAtL _ I` Y e gross area o ) property y s quare Designed: Drawn:lRH
RETAIN .W"ROPYALL - - _
--- �� s*�[xse 6 The subject property ll zoned 394 M ate Use,per,2 ng letter dated lune 14,2012 and 394 M zed Use.Subdistrict (mid se p stories),p Approved: Book/Page.1101/5,69 7
I - '^ / 11,I a the City Golden Valley zoning map dated March 20141ett B m u to
_ _ I ed 1/e
I
3
01 / I 1 Initial Issued.3/
�$ BITUMINOUS SURFACE 1 1 _ -1h _ grown y. yno
Ds Phase' I � 6/zola
m 3 i DRIVEWAY EASEMENT DOC.NO.1033214 " ss(E1 IPi 7. a.the building n and eider or dimensions of the outside wall at d level are shown on the surve It may t be the foundation wall
I b.The squaregootage 0f the building's 55,550 square feet SIOn History
N
�w --}-- 9. cover,the parkin and the subject rt t 1 shown 1 ma and surveyor s
-_ unabletgnscertain the number of talls areas an pug on let property approx ma eys per aero fiery an yiri
Revision
- Duet of significant
— MAGN o' _
(/ FD 1Y2'IP'i -
�I1A AIL 1 0 0 �- � C�- �I 11. Underground utilities are per,comb nation of the follow ng
No.Date BySubmittalRevision
_- '' ___ - - - -- - _ e
- - --` - --- - located f State O Ticket N 140380401
S - _ -RESTRICTED ACCESS70 I-394 - -- - _ __ - - - �_ RM WWl b.As ocate or us by Gopher a e ne Call,Tice o.
�- + a Observed evident
_PDi-BOC-NO.: 417782- -._ - _ _ _ _
A Gopher State One Call(GSOC)request was placed on 2/7/2014 for utility
locates on this site.The underground utility locations,shown hereon,if
any,
are based locates from those utilityproviders taual y performed a locate aresult ofIh s Utility suppliers often do
notrespond to
awineu of physical The surveyorma es no guarantees that the
these
may provide ambiuousmap pans,andd
underground utilities shown comprise all such utilities in the area,either in service err abandoned.Utility information shown hereon,if any,is e
I I compilation of this map information and those visible utilities that were loci, do ring the survey field work.The surveyor further does not arrant that
the underground utilities shown hereon,if any,are in the exact location as indicated,although he does certify that they are located as accurately as
---HIGHWAY EASEMENT PER DOC.N0,562329- I I possible from i nformation available.The surveyor has not physic,lly located the underground utilities.Pursuant to MS 216.13 contact Gopher State One
Call at(651-454-0002)prior to any excavation.
Ii m I 13.The names of adjoining owners of platted lands are shown on the survey.
h iN
" I CERTIFICATION VICINITY MAP Sheet Title
I
To Morries Automotive Group;TCF National Bank,its successors ALTA ACSM
W i and/or assigns;Wagener Properties,LLC,a Minnesota limited liability
U i company;and Stewart Title Guaranty Company:
d 1 This is to certify that this map or plat andthe the survey on which it isN.F.S.
Land Title
INTERSTATE HIGHWAY N0.394 I I
base were made info[ordancewMLan201eSurveumntlyStandard loo
Detail Requirements for ALTA/ACSM Land Title Surveys,jointly Survey
HIGHWAY EASEMENT p
p (WAYZATA BLVD) PER DOC NO.155672 p ' established and by ALTAand NSPS,and includes Items 1,2,3,
p I I I 4,5,
,5,6(b),7(a),7(b)(1),8,9,11(b)and 13 of Table A thereof.The field
i I I work was completed on 2/25/2014. 55
II Dated this 6th day of March,2014. _
MFRA Inc.
_ I o 0 0 0 0 ' MARKETST
3 0-0—o—o—a —o—a—o—o— 580.00°——o—o———o—o—o—o 4257 0-.- 5]2.89 - z SIT '',.
Sheet No. Revision
o a
0
I a
S89e57i28eE 542.57 `-5 LINE OF THE SE 1/4 OF 11E Marcus F Hampton,S _ 394
NW 1/4 SEC 5,T.117,R 21 lVnnesota Lcense No 47481 169 2 1 1/1
This certification is not valid unless wetsigned in blue ink. - -
Project No.MOR19974
i - -- - -- -
�' ---- ---------�------------- ---�--- ----- -_" -- �_ � ���_����,.____- - LEGEND
E PROPOSED EXISTING
r_ e
PROPERTY LIMIT ra
CURB&GUTTER
STORM SEWER -0# O DP-'®
DRAINTILE -a..-ra.-
1 RETAINING WALL 00000000000 14800 2861 lwe.N.SOB 140
WETLAND LIMITS tel- "3"mft MIBBBSm355447
i TREEurvE UM 476.6010 talB hMe
I
SPOT ELEVATION 962.5 96z.s M478.8092 1861811.
CONTOUR wwwinlim.0081
I RIP RAP
OVERFLOW ELEV. x E�902.5 Client
L i SOIL BORINGSLU
,L
' LIMITSDISTURBANCE B� M O R R I E'S
SILTSILTLTFENCE
FENCE ■aFwSFEFw NSFE
SILT Q f
.. FENCE
PROTECTION TYPE I AUTOMOTIVEi.
FILTEftSACKSINLET GROUP
j PROTECTION TYPE 2 ®8
12520 WAYZATA BOULEVARD
II J
TEMPORARY STONE MINNETONKA,MN 55305
}I I
Z I ' ' CONSTRUCTION EXIT
; Project
I MORRIE'S
I LUXURY AUTO
I � ' � ;;% soT� -84.16•'' i
1
1
' MATCH e/- x
LOT 1 - i - -'� �- ------ -- -------------------
R4.2
---------- -- -
1 ,.
i_t ! - -
i 842 83.81 9
85.3 847
5 { I
- 5.9 IPJ Pz ' ►► {' Location
es.3
- ,i 95 g5 es GOLDEN
I
1 6 B52
5.
i 86.0 860 i
/ VALLEY, MN
M* ps.25 86A 85.6 85.4 7400 WAYZATA BLVD.
I
!I
t i tl5, . 85.0
i G
PROSED BU 120,986I
v i
ODING
f I P 5.F IL
-8LO C K� FFE=886.0
- -- Certification
LOT i' Thereby cert,,that...Msplanda-ydi r
report was prepared by......der mytl rest
d that lama dui d
J( ; supfrvsonl ENGINEER underthe laws ofth,state
- ( porn essona
i1 I 3845 85'2 gi 85 5 f M'nnesq[a
I
I
85.4 85.4 84.8 {
BradyD Busselman
Regstraton No 44579 Date 02/21/2014
I Ifa ble,mnl.-for.
h N-s available upgn
84.9 8gS 85. pp ica et s8netl cgpV of this
panw- requesla[MFf1A,Inc.,
PlymouthMN ORre
I
- 4 1
1 84.2 98A
1
Summary
Designed.BDB/GDA Drawn:MT
83.6 IP..1 IP 2 L. Approved:BDB Book/Page:
I
I
1
-� --+I
883
.. -_
Phase:PREIIMINAgYnitl
d6BD
02/2
1/2014
014
4� 3
Revision History
No.Date By Submittal inion
7, _
E8IDRETENTION A.03/13/14 JMT Updatets-y&
SW BIDRETENTIO IP2 BASIN 5tormwater Management Revisions
I
1 BASIN B 04/25/14 WIT F,,t PUDPIans
1
- - - - _ -
CONNECr70=11 _ _ __ -LEGEND wnfMAINPERCITUDETAIL - ____`_`__- ___-_-________.c,_..,.�_'___"_'_._-- _--�- _- �_�r� �'""'.'_._`�"""s__ -.�
r � --'__--- - - � - --- - PROPOSED EXISTING
- I
"SANITARY SEWER J - 30 LF 6'SAN �, I _
SERVICE(MAIN TO I SWR @ 2.0% CO1E-875.00 CO PROPERTY LIMIT
PROPERTY LIN EI" l;0 IE-874.00 IE=876.00 CO IE-896.]] CURB&GUTTER ra
FIELD VERIFY LOCATION - STORM SEWER �►���
&ELEVATION 1 :71
I I I I I FORCE AINSEWER(SAN.)
IE--873.4 ( -_ \\
- I I FORCEMAIN(SAN.) �Pll�
-�- WET TAP&CONNECT „'� 100 LF-6"SAN 6 WATER SERVICE 301 LF-6"SAN /� ..___ _.._._ _ �' WATERMAIN HSI -- 148M 28M Am K Ste 146
4'GATE VALVE' SWR @1.0% SWR@1.0% -nE—EFF - _ ---.--.
100 LF-6'SAN EASEMENT LIIh,MlnnesOm55447
SWR @ 1.0% - ! DRAINTILE M 476.6010 Wephone
GASUNE M 476.8882
I — i TELEPHONEICwwwAfta.00111
{11 -
- / 68 LF-6"SAN
Z CLEANOUT C00 Client
SWR @1.0% CO IE=077.fi5
- UTILITY CONSTRUCTION NOTES
I Lua a MORRIE'S
t A. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PIANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS
�1
6"WATER SERVICE I BUILDINGUTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS. AUTOMOTIVE DOCKS,PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND EXACT AUTOMOTIVE
11 I
B. THE CONTRACTOR 15 SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATION OF EXISTING GROUP
i1 j UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES
AND,WHERE POSSIBLE,MEASUREMENTS TAKEN INTHEFIELD.THE INFORMATION IS NOT TO BE RELIED
J ON AS BEING E%ACi DR DDMPLETE.THE CONTRACTOR MUST CALL THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY 12520 WAYZATA BOULEVARD
{. ATLEAST48 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OFUTILITIESAT MINNETONKA,MN 55305
100 LF-6"SAN I♦ SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH
SWR @ 1.0% - '1 CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS.THE LOCATIONS OF SMALL
Z UTILITIES SHALL BE OBTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR,BY CALLING GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT
(651)51)45454-0002.
1 Z C _ C. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO AVOID PROPERTY DAMAGE TO
W �. ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASES OF THIS PROJECT THE CONTRACTOR WILL project
a I i BE HELD SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGES TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES OCCURRING DURING
try I "1 M1 CO IE=878.65 THE CONSTRUCTION PHASES OFTHIS PROJECT
= I I 1 (
D. SAFETY NOTICE TO CONTRACTORS:IN ACCORDANCE WITH GENERALLY ACCEPTED CONSTRUCTION M O RR I E'S
1 PRACTICES,THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE SOLELY AND COMPLETELY RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDITIONS ON
tij i I- THE JOB SITE,INCLUDING SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY DURING PERFORMANCE OF THE
LUXURY AUTO
WORK.THIS REQUIREMENT WILL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING
HOURS.THE DUTY OF THE ENGINEER OR THE DEVELOPER TO CONDUCT CONSTRUCTION REVIEW OF THE
i
CONTRACTOR'S PERFORM ANCE IS NOT INTENDED TO INCLUDE REVIEW OF THEA DEQUACV OF THE
CB 6 s:, i CONTRACTOR'S SAFETY MEASURES IN,ON OR NEAR THE CONSTRUCTION SITE.
I h .=a -aFB E. ALL AREAS OUTSIDE THE PROPERTY BOUNDARIES THAT ARE DISTURBED BY UTILITY CONSTRUCTION
\ I LOT 1 SHALL BE RESTORED IN KIND.SODDED AREAS SHALL BE RESTORED WITH 61NCHES OF TOPSOIL PLACED
80 LF 6"SAN __ _ } BENEATH THE SOD
v. x
SWR _ _ _______ ___�F-12"ST @10% .
i
r a
r
AINING
��0 STMN3F DEVICEESSUCHAOR SHALL BE SBARRICADES,WARNINGSGNS,DIREC IONASPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING LSGNIS,TFLAGMEN�ANDLGHHTSTOL Location
FFIC CONT
RE-883.6
(
!I I IE=880.82 CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC WHERE NECESSARY.TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL
I �
� CONFORM TO APPROPRIATE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARDS.
GOLDEN
i
N
G. PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF AGGREGATE BASE,A TEST ROLL WILL BE REQUIRED ON THE STREET AND
6"SANITARY SEWER j PARKING AREA SUBGRADE THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE LOADED TANDEM AXLE TRUCK WITH
SERVICE 1 7 GROSS WEIGHT OF 25 TONS THE TEST ROLLING SHALL BEAT THE DIRECTION OF THE SOILS ENGINEER VALLEY, MN
f r I i. AND SHALL BE COMPLETED IN AREAS AS DIRECTED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER.THESOILS ENGINEERSHALL 7400 WAY
IE=B79AS IATA BLVD.
DETERMINE WHICH SECTIONS OF THE STREET OR PARKING AREA ARE UNSTABLE.CORRECTION OF THE
6"WATER SERVICE I SUBGRADE SOILS SHALL BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SOILS
1 I I ENGINEER.
H. THE CONTRACTOR AND THEIR SUPPLIER SHALL DETERMINE THE MINIMUM DIAMETER REQUIRED FOR
I nl EACH STORM SEWER STRUCTURE.
Pit1
-- BI Li OCK; PROPOSED BU
ILDING
20,986 S.F.
FFE=886.0
Certification
t
I
LOT2 Ih-bycertfyin-Els plan,spedacaron4r
-- -- - IL� -- s ,n s on prep ared bymeor yende,rect
y di-
up-mm,
i
up
I I I
and that lamadul I d
profess onal ENGINEER antler Mel awsofthe state
I I , afM nnesota
I
i I
r � I
t
I
I
Brady D.Busselman
(F I� —STORM SEWER STRUCTURE SCHEDULE
Peg stranon No 44579 Date.02/21/2014
E_
NUMBER* TYPE CASTING** If apPTcable,conta[t us lorawetsgnetl mpy of this
-1 Cel-A plan u ch s ava Iab1e upon request at MFRA
RE 8820 33 LF-12" 53 LF-15" STMH1 STORM MANHOLE R-1642 vtymouth MNoffce
IE�79.0 STM @ 1.3%
...{ - STM @ 1.0% CB 1-A CATCH BASIN R-2560
I
1 1 CBMH2 CATCH BASIN MANHOLE R-2560 Summary
IItL� 0.CBMHE881.5 STM STORM MAN R-1642 Designed.gog/GOA Drawn:fMT
H 3 HOLE Approved.gog Book/Page:
l -
IE-878.84 CB 4 CATCH BASIN R-1878-67G
Phase PRELIMINARY Initial Issued:0212112014
z 'INDICATES NEENAH FOUNDRY CASTING NO.,OR APPROVED EQUAL
G?�
-...
AA AA
"PROVIDE 27 INCH ROUND OPENING IN MANHOLE SLAB COVER
I / ,
I
Revision History
I
�_
I
- ��. THE CONTRACTOR AND THEIR SUPPLIER SNAIL DETERMINE THE MINIMUM DIAMETER ND.Date By
Submittal Revision
�- tF ----..--__-.--. --_. _-1," _ - - -- - QUIRED FOR EACH STORM SEWER STRUCTURE. A 03/13/14 IMT updated5urvey&
,
I NO
--" -1
+ - 5LF-15 1
f - STM @ 15% 5tormwater Management Rev Bions
I
6 NOV.
CONNECgTO EXIST" IMT Final PUD Glans
I I
IE=878.09
I 1
r I
J
ROW._DEDICATIOfy_----
-- < Sheet Title
UTILITY PLAN
r
Sheet No. Revision
. . .,ass a.�nystys,w.s asTaaM�xro t,] NORTH /�.O A
Ill..oe,:
FEE FENCE LANDSCAPE
EXTEND SUM AL WIDE X 24"DEEP PIAN FOR PROPOSED ra
SUMP ALONG 3'CURBCUT� CATCH BASIN WITH DOMED GRATE PLANTING
(SEE UTILITY PLAN)
MINIMUM O.1'DROP POND BOTTOM
3' FROM BACK OF CURB TO 6"CLEAN OUT WITH THREADED ELEV=SEEGflADING PLAN '�
12' 12" r—� CONCRETE PLUG LONG RADIUS 90.EYP) i;
4"-6"GABION STONE ITYPI 48 12"
2 24 I TIE5 PAVEMENT g g�
2:1 SLOPE MNDOT 3733 TYPE 11 "^-`- - '"-- '_-_ R R
4"PORT LAND CEMENT CONCRETE GEOTEXTILE UNER BETWEEN 4.w -j
1/2" 3"
6
__ �- 14600 2801 Ave R.Ste 140
STONE AND SUBGRADE/SOLE 2"SLOPE 1 Pymouth,Minnesota 55441
0"SANG MN/DOTSPEC 3149.25 MIX •� <- < 32"MIN.PIAISTED'S MIX - �3 1/2"R 1�M�1
1:1 SLOPE SLOPE 3/4"PER FT. LI W1476.6016 telephone
GEOTEXTIIE FABRIC IINER6oz c O
NON-WOVEN FABRIC BETWEEN STONE �(\\\�\ PEAGMVEI LU DEEP l2"ABOVE&BELOW PIPE) —v 2 2„ < CI6•�I46.65•.• f06III1I10
AND SUBGRADE/$OIL MIX SECTION B-B 2-
BOTTOM REV `6"5MOOTH WALL POLYETHYLENE DRAIN PIPE. o o -+" • WWW.IFIh0.00111
NO SCALE SFE GRADING PIAN MEETING ASTM Fg10.BALL ANO SPIGOT JOINTS. ,
2 HOLE,120'HANCOR PRODUCT CODE OW 2ER
7J ONCRETE 04 W10 OR EQUAL PLACE WITH HOLES DOWN. T -
- BIORETENTION BASIN PROFILEIF
=SEE UTILR PAN S AINlE555TEEl Client
TAPPING SLEEVE =^ ^ +
B N.T.S. 2 6"MIN 8" IB' A MINIMUM OF 4"OF CLASS S 1
SHALL BE PLACED BELOW THE CURB MORRIE S
2-FEET
LENGTH,
RODS AT TERED NTHECH SR REFAUTOMOTIVE
8612 CURB&GUTTER 9 20 FEET IN LENGTH,CENTERED ON THE STRUCTURE
L ,L(tP• FOREPROPO ED 11EA, NG RENCE 1A DSCAPE N
I 3. 3. I 3' I 9 GROUP
s•TRAxsmox 12520 WAYZATA BOULEVARD
' \ ,�" , 3"R MINNETONKA,MN 55305
THRUSTBLOCK 1/2"R
TOP (OJy CURB CUT -i-...— "..�___-.._..�._ —__.
NO SCALE
9 -- 32"MIN.PIAISTED'$MIX g
SLOPE 3/4"PER FT.
32'TRAN2"1
SITION
B612CU0.I&GUTTER CURB PERSPECTIVE _ �— m 2• I -
Project
10"PEA GRAVEL(SHOW 2"
1 3' 3' L 3' NO SCALE &BELOW PIPETMORRIEIS
7AFROVI
GEOTEI(TILE FABRIC LINER box
I I
NON-WOVEN FABRIC ITYPILAY -_ '
OVER PIPE — - -
UNDISTURBEOEARTH LUXURY AUTO
SECTION A-A 6"SCHEDULE 40 PVC PIPE W ITH 2-44 REINFORCING RODS AT CATCH BASIN$
J'OHO
NO SCALE L ON2"CENTERS IN COMPACTEOGRANULAfl
STOP PIPE V FROM SIDE SLOPE
BACKFILL DR ROCK CONCRETE BLOCK 20 FEET IN LENGTH,CENTERED ON THE STRUCTURE
CURB CUT �1 BIORETENTION BASIN �1
NTS °/23/°N L NTS. 3 WATERMAIN WET TAP �1 B618 CONCRETE CURB&GUTTER
N.T.S. REV.6/96 ~ NT.S. i Location
A I �
T-8" T-8' BASE DIAMETER GOLDEN
OF
VALLEY, MN
/ Q \ DESIRED MINIMUM2/_ 7400 WAYZATA BLVD.
CONCRETE WALK OUTER LIMITS OF
4"P.C.CONCRETE` a CONCRETE WALK
Q:o•, A� cps DOME SECTION
4'0" pP \ 1-5/8"-2-3/8"1 1-5/8"-2-3/8" —�
1 `�E17
T 5/8 MIN 5/8" IN
15/16'(TYPI J �I� `;EENPH K-1'S3 SERIES >ULI)
Q p DOME ITYR) 1/16' I t _.
5'-0"MIN WIDTH DOME SPACING COVER (SEE :GHT;, ESS BROS. � 1 '�.:f � I �..,cF e)�� Certification
4 5 o NOTE: -01, OR APPROVED EQUAL Inereb rt that this I pet
4"P.C.CONCRETE - / - y to fy p an,s fi a on or
2.00% ,Cis THE CURB AND CURB TRANSITION ON THE RAMP WILL BE PAID FOR AS LINEAR FEET OF CONCRETE CURB OR / V, Ij��F- •(X report was prepared I or NnI mydirect
4. CU
CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER.THE RAMP AREA WILL BE PAID AS SQUARE FEET OF CONCRETE WALK,UNLESS
and thatlamadulylcensed
SPECIFIED OTHERWISE.THE TRUNCATED DOME AREA WILL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL FLEX—SEAL SEALAP:T OP.—1 / �"�.J.. %S profess onal ENGINEER under the laws of the state
6^ �. � ofM nnesOta
APPROVCD EQUAL (SEE / ,(
4"CLAS11 4'0'6 2 6'-3' O 1/2INCH PREFORMED JOINT FILLER MATERIAL,AASHTO M 213. DETAIL GV-SS-000) / / 5• 1
SECT ION
A-A O VARIES WITH CURB HEIGHT.EXAMPLE SHOWN IS FOR 6"CURB HEIGHT. 1,
3 27" CONCRETE
RBO3. 6"TO8"IS THE REQUIRED OFFSET OF THE DETECTABLE WARNINGS/TRUNCATED DOME AREA FROM THE .ADJUST''-NG RINGS 24" ,��\ Brady D.Bu55elman
GENERAL NOTES FOR CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION: A_--I FRONT FACE OF CURB,OR PLACE THE DETECTABLE WARNINGS AT THE BACK OF CURB. (MIN. 2 MAX. Registration No,44579 Date:02/21/2014
1. THE CONCRETESIDEWALKSSHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH PLAN VIEW OF RAMP ROUND ALL I IfapPlcable con as us for wet sig,,d topyof this
O.DB RJR,SLOPE OF FLARED 4. ADA FULL
(T O"OR 4'0OME AREA SHALL CURB Y D"MIN.IN DIRECTION OF 4'0"WIDTH
MF.)
EMEND [ a
SLOPEDINTERS O I�-27•• 12• plan_Hn'.avffi b,, upon request at MFRA,Inc.,
THE REQUIREMENTS OF MN/DOT"STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR SIDE IIF EXISTING CONDITIONS DO THE FULL WIDTH(3'0"OR 4'0"TVP.)OF THE CURB RAMP.THI52'0"BY 3'0"OR 4'0'WIDTH(TYP.) :.- r, I— PlymeuLM1,MN exice.
CONSTRUCTION'. NOT PERMIT,MAY USE 0.10 TRUNCATED DOME AREA SHALL CONTRAST VISUALLY WITH THE ADJACENT WALKING SURFACE.THEENTIRE ► �S j1L• —
FT./FT.-0.08 FTJR.SLOPE) TRUNCATED DOME AREA SHALL BEA LIGHT COLOR(LIGHT GRAY,WHITE,OR YELLOW)WHEN THE ADJACENT 7"
2. SIDEWALK CONTROL JOINTS SHALL BELOCATED ATSFEET ONCENTER. SIDEWALK ISA DARK COLOR.THE ENTIRE TRUNCATEDDOMEAREASHALLBEADARKCOLOR(RED,BLACK, Summary
SI DEWALK EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL BE LOCATED ATA MAXIMUM OF 100 _ DARK GRAY,DR BRIGHT YELLOW)WHEN THE ADJACENT SIDEWALK ISA"WHITE"OR LIGHTGRAY CEMENT 0—RINGS7
FEET ON CENTER,AND WHERE SI DEWALK ABUTS CU RB,STRUMRES,AND COLOR. ON JOINTS 6" Designed:BDB/GDA D(awn')MT
OTHER FIXED OBJECTS.SEAL ALL EXPANSION JOINTS.BROOM FINISH SHALL BE 6'3" O I 4' O6 6'-3"O2 O5. THE TRUNCATED DOME AREA MAY BE EITHER GRANITE PANEL OR STAMPED CONCRETE,INSTALLED IN Approved:BDB Book/Page:
PERPENDICULAR TO THE LINE OF TRAFFIC. "'�
STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURES RECOMMENDATIONS.GRANITE PANELS SHALL BE 2° Phase:PRELIMINARY Initial ISSued:02/21/2014
16'-6" NOMINAL THICKNESS WITH SANDED TEXTURED FINISH,FREE OF ANY CRACKS,CHIPS OR COLOR
'THE THICKNESS SHALL BE INCREASED TOA DEFORMATIONS.STAMPED CONCRETE SHALL MEET REQUIREMENTS OF 3A36 CONCRETE M IX AND HAVE VARIES Revision History
MINI MUM DEPTH OF IN CHES AT DRIVEWAY INTEGRATED HOMOGENEOUS COLORING. NOTE:
CROSSINGS. ELEVATION OF RAMP No.Date By Submittal/Revision
4'0"FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION.3'0"ALLOWED FOR RETROFITS OR PRESERVATIONPROJECTS. WHERE -PE IS USED T: A 0/13/14 JMT Updated Survey&
5'.4"O MANHOLE LL BE UR,,SHED Swrmwater Management aeP Slons
CURB OR CURB WHEN POSSIBLE,PROVIDE A PATH OF TRAVEL 4'0"WIDE BEHIND THE PEDESTRIAN RAMP.A RELATIVELY a 04/25/14 JMT Final PUD Plans
CONCRETE SIDEWALK AND GUTTER WITH WATER T';-T B
PE OR FLATTER FLAT(2%MAXIMUM SLOPE)4'X 4'LANDING WILL ALLOW WHEELCHAIRS TO NAVIGATE AROUND THE
6 ^-7 oggFi.7EM'FT3LI2 PEDESTRIAN RAMP.
N.T.S. All MANE ES S- IJ(;IL:DF
NON CORK' S P�
CONCRETE WALK 5
1
SECTION A-A z D
PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP /___N 3 1 _�— Sheet Title
``-A" 'RF:CA.S1 GDN-. OR DETAILS
CAST-1\-P-ACE BASE
APPROVED FEBRUARY 1, 2007
STANDARD SANITARY
SEWER MANHOLE WITH
CASTING & COVER
CITY FNG:NLER REG 23110 GY-SS_010
Sheet No. Revision
C7.01 B
Project No.MOR19974
253_/4 knf ra
3/4" �191h9v'RYY9
�0
CONCRETE �� /( 148002881 Ave.KSOB 140
ADJUSTMENT RINGS / , 11yng1101,MInnIB5ata55447
(OR APPROVED EQUAL) l� 17631476.6010 telephone
CAST IRON FRAME & COVER MIN. 2 MAX. 5�� ~ 17631476.6532 facsimile
NEENAH R-1733 SERIES SOLID 4 www.mtra.com
(SEE DETAIL GV-ST-050) I/8" \
COVER (SEE RIGHT), ESS EROS_ g•.
301, O4 APPROVED EQUAL y > Client
FITTING HUB WITH 4" THREADED R 5'
PLUG. APPLY TEFLON THREAD FLEX-SEAL SEALANT OR- 7�—
SEAL ADJUSTMENTTAPEOR APPROVED EQUAL, APPROVED EQUAL (SEE r24"--� RINGS (SEE NOTE)—' ` �.�\ � i �!� MORRIE,S
OVER THREADS. UEIAIL GV-S5-oo0) �✓ i
FINISHED GRADE -
35 7/16, � N AUTOMOTIVE
GROUP
—�=1 I IJ I 1=1 I ��—27" STING IN
12520 WAYZATA BOULEVARD
' T I� 27, ADJUSTING RINGS \ \ MINNETONKA,MN 55305 R
...
(MIN. 2 MAX, 5)
MINIMUM 4" __
ATTACH A GREEN #12 SOLID PVC CLEANOUT �T O RINGS
COPPER TRACER WIRE AT 3' (SEE DETAIL 16� ON JOINTSOu
_
O.C. WITH PLASTIC ZIP-TIES GV-ST-050) v,i L.It.i:S AS N-GU RED
(OR APPROVED EQUAL) PRECAS- OP. BLOCK \\ /, Project
VARIES DESIGN 4020 PRECAST CONCRETE
2% SLOPE MINIMUM D BASE SLAB MO�[RRI�E'SS
D 5" \OTE: WHERE PVC PIPE IS USED THE NOTE: LUXURY•`UTO
2 CCNTRACTCR SHIA_L FURNISH
�
-BENDS AS NEEDED I_
MANHOLE WITH WATER TIGHT BOO. CASTINGS SHALL BE NEENAH 33067-L W7H "L" T:'P=
PLUG OR CAP GRATE.
FERNCOT"RUBBER SADDLE GLUED INPLACE `.OTE DASHED LINE DENOTES SUMP, IF WYE (OR APPROVED EQUAL) SPECIFIED, IN MANHOLE�� IF MORE THAN 5 - 2" RINGS ARE NEEDED OCVIRA TOR
SHALL USE A COMBINATION OF 2", 6 AND 12' .L.GS '0
SEWER MAIN - 3E' ACFIEVE NEEDED HEIGHT. Location
q ► Imo-PRECAST OR BLOCK ` y__-AL GOLDEN
NOTE: ----r' RINGS SHALL B SEALED USING APPROVED FLEX-S_-AL- -
_ � UTILITY SEALANT ANC ..°CLIC T'.0'd f ALL FCLLOV C_'A;L
ALL SERVICE PIPE SHALL BE SDR-26 PVC, SCHEDULE t CV-SS-000. VALLEY, MN
40 PVC, IC CIL 152 DIP. SERVICE SHALL BE A MINIMUM r r \CR. 1= I>: ACCCRDHNCE
8" PRECAST CONCRETE OR REINFORCING AND CG AR-. TC BE
OF 8.0' DEEP AT THE PROPERTY LINE. SCHEDULE 40 - _
PVC PIPE SHALL HAVE SOLVENT JOINTS. CAST-I\—?—ACE BASE WITH ASTM SPEC'.FIG'.-IOP; 7400 WAYZATA BLVD.
APPROVED SEPTEMBER 29, 2008 APPROVED JANUARY 3, 2010 STANDARD STORM . APPROVED JAUNARY 3, 20'0
SANITARY SEWER CATCH BASIN
SEWER MANHOLE DES X�11 l
SERVICE (MAIN TO toldeflgey tbW 'alley DESIGN K s L il� r
PROPERTY LINE) 4020 WITH CASTING &
CITY ENGINEER REG 23110 GV-SS-060 CITY ENGINEER REG 23710 COVER OV-ST-010 CITY ENGINEER REG 23110 GV-ST-030
Certification
hereby certify[hat[his plan,specification or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed
professional ENGINEER under the laws of the state
of Minnesota.
APPROVED MA7E3 ALS'
=ITTI\^ -A_L F T-1NGS SHALL BE-PDXY CCATEC Brady D.BusSelman
YELLOW F_EX-STAKE BRACKET DJC TILE PON AND BOLTED W1'H EPDXY COATED
FINISEDMOON TED FYORAVT MARKER STAINLESS STEEL BOLTS AND 1JT5. Registration No.44579 Date:02/21/2014
SET IND BELOW FN.SHED GRADE WTH RE-LEcnvE LABELis
B TUMINQUS EL=VATIQN HYDRANTS-AVK DRY 3ARRE_SERIES 2700 OR If ap.hi,he. Itactvs Pbr n,q...gned copy om.,
- APPROVED EU-T (THREADS-NATIONAL STANDARD PlYmauth,. o�Bcele upon m9uest al MFRA,Inc.,
ON 2 1/2"BU-TS AM1D MINM1 EAPC_IS ON 4 1/2"
7
ST AVER NOZZLE).HYDRANTS SHALL BE PAIN-ED S
T--- ---I—_— — _ 95-8002(PPG CODE)INDUSTRIA_YELLOW. Summary
4.0' _�
CL 52 DIP(VINIMJM). Designed:BDB/GDA DraWn:1MT
1 1 GA E VA VE 30X-SIZE 1,DUCTILE IRCN,TYLER Approved:BDB Book/Page:
4.0` SEED,WITH 5"DROP LID HAVING-HE'WORD"WATER" Phase:PRELIMINARY Initial Issued:02/21/2014
'f 2.5' CAS-THEREON AND E THAN RASE.THE 30X O
SITA EXTEND NOT_ESS AN '2"UPWARD FROM Revision History
/ FITTNGS - ALL FIT INGS SHAL_ BE EPDXY NITIAL WSTA_L0 VALVE AND NER,E A POWER Date
COA-ED DUCTILE IRON AND BOLTED W'TH SEAL MODE_5STE VALVE BCT A_GNER,2. A 03/13/ 8y Submittal/Revision
E'OXY CCAT=D STA NL-SS STEEL BOLTS --DATED 1/4"STEEL PER ASTM A53/A512. A p3/13/14 IMT Uptla[ed Survey&
NEENAH R—/3G2 DITC-i AND NU S. GA-1 11-VE-EPDXY COATED IRON BODY, S[ormwater Management Revisions
RESIUEN`WEDGE N ACCORDANCE W-F AWWA C509. a 04/25/14 IMT FinaIPUDPIans
GRATE, STOOL -"PE NGN-RISNG STEM WITH O-RING PACKING WTH A
GATE VA V= -EPDXY COATED RON BODY,
WOR KING PRESsI.RE OF 150 PSI.THEY MOST OPE\
0 c' COUNTER CLOC<-WISE AND BE EOU==ED WITH
RESI_IEN- WEDGE IN ACCORDANCE WT MECHANICAL JOINTS.
AW'WA C509. NON-RISING S-EM WITH 0-RING -1--" -1
PACKING WITH A WORKING -RESSURE OF '50
0 PSI. THEY MUST OPEN CCLN-ER CLOCK-'WISE
AND BE EO.IPPED WITH MECHANICAL JOINTS.
�„ �QCRED CONIC_ ---� .�--5" GATE VA-VE BOX - SZE G DUCTILE IRON,
_ _ TYLER 6860, WITH 5" DROP LID HAVING THE
_
BASE. OR A_ ERNA E - WORD "WATER" CAST THEREON AND #6
PRECAST CONCRE E ROUND BASE. THE BOXES SHALL EX-END 7.5'
_ 27" DIA. NOT SS THAN 12" CPWARD ROMA IN
BASE' SE' \4ND0" PRECAST 1\STALLED POSITION AND INCLUDE A POWER INSTALL 2-3/4"THREADED RODS AT SPRING_NE Sheet Title
STANDARD PLATES VALVE BOX OF EACH SECTION OF PIPE OOVER ALL RODS WITH
,^..".0\1CR_TE �1DE SEAL MODEL SOOG VA-VE BOX ALIGNER, ALIGNER I POLY ENCASEMENT OR APPROVED CORROSION DETAILS
INDEX. BASE PIPE / E'OXY CCATEC 1/4" STEEL PER ASTM INHIBI-OR.MEGALUG c_ANDS MAY BE SJBSTITUTED FOR
A53/A512. VALVE BOX RODS(R ODCING IS R-OUIR'D IF MORE T-IAN ONE PIPE
REINFORCEMENT: C.12 ALIGNER (LENGTH IS LSED BETWEEN THE VA-VE AND THE TEE)
SQ. N. PER F00- V t
EACH DIRECTION. \ �1
SLOPE i"/FT t
—�
5" VIIN.— —TEE
` C-T 6'DIA.N o_E TO GET 12"FLANGE TO F_ANGE
• • •.
4 .
'6%1 6"X5" SET HYDRANT ABOVE DRAIN AOPENING AIN PIT IND PTA E"POE-OR TAR PCP7RK.FOVER
Sheet No. Revision
■ 2' C-R. CONCRETE BLOCK ON 1B'at6"s' -
CONCRETE BLOCK OP, C7.02
/� Q
APPROVED=E3RUARY', 2007 e APPROVED =E3RUARY 2007 APPROVED=E3RUARY', 2007 l 7.02 v
DRAINAGE STRUCTJRE, y T F CAL GAT_ VALVE TYPICAL YDRAVTt*l ey "`///
CES GN SPECIA_ (MD) INSTALLA-ION ey INSTALLA-ION
CI-Y ENGINELR REG 23110 OV-ST-130 CI'-Y ENGINEER REG 23110 OV-IMM-000 GI"Y ENGINEER REG 23110 OY-IN1"10 Project No.MOR19974
PARKING REQUIREMENTS:
EXISTING BUILDING: (62,869 sq.ft.)
,-
10'-0'BUaomG SHOWROOM(DISPLAY) (9,745 sq.ft.)
SETBACK (1 SPACE/1,000 SFJ= 10 SPACES
_ PARTS/STORAGE (8,569 sq,ft.)
-- _._._ _. _._._ _ _. _ ..._. _. y _ (1SPACE/3,000SF)= 3SPACES ���• �
15 � OFFICE SPACE (5,758 sq.ft.)
w'PARKING
I (1 SPACE/250 SF)= 23 SPACES
I Ix— SETBACK-� 2 Darwin Lindahl Architects,P.A.
SERVICE(40 STALLS) 4124 Quebec Ave.North,Suite 106
(4 SPACE/STALL)= 160 SPACES Minneapolis, Minnesota 55427
Ph:763.560.0448 Fax:763. 41
a m
NEW BUILDING: (20,986 sq.ft.) ad.lindahla ch@gmail—rin
d com
241
/
THIS DRHMATION AWING AND THE INFOTHEREIN IS THE
I
SHOWROOM(DISPLAY) (20,966 Sq.ft.) PROPERTY OF DARWIN LINOAHL ARCHITECTS,PA ITS
USE BY THE HOLDER Oft DISCLOSURE TO OTHERS
(1 SPACE/1,000 SF)= 21 SPACES WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF DAmWIN
LINDML ARCHITECTS, PA IS PROHIBITED. IT
CONTAINS PROPRIETARY AND CONFIOENiIAI
1 INFORMATION OF DARWIN UNDAHL ARCHITECTS,PA
_
MIN.SPACES REQUIRED= 217 SPACES REPRODULRION OF THE MATERIAL HEREIN WITHOUT
TOTAL SPACES PROVIDED= 283 SPACES WRITTEN PERMISSKNB of auwln uNDAHL
I — DISPLAY SPACES AVAIL.= 66 SPACES MCHRECTS,PA VIOLATES THE OOPYWRITE IAWS OF
10'-O'BUILDING THE UNITED STATES AND WILL SUBJECT THE
I SETBACK VIOLATOR&TO LEGAL PROSECUTION.
COPYRIGHT 9 2013 BY DARWIN UNDAHL MCHTIECTS,PA.
18
PRELIMINARY BUILDING CODE ANALYSIS Project#: 2013-30
CODE-.STATE OF MINNESOTA,ISC 2006(AS ADOPTED)
I 4 _ EXISTING STRUCTURE:
I OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION -MIXED,SEPARATE USES
SERVICE SHOP - S-1
sIDPRJO
PER \ SHOWROOM/OFFICE - B
TYSTANDARDS OCCUPANCY SEPARATION -2 HOUR
— TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION- 11-B (SPRINKLERED) O
I I � FLOOR AREA: 55,575 sq.ft.(main level) 11--
7,364
7,354 sq.ft.(upper level)
Q
I Iz
P
—I ROPOSED STRUCTURE: 0
_ OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION LL }' >
SHWROOM/OFFICE - B m }
I �i TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION- 11-B (SPRINKLERED) � W
, ft. (mainlevel)
ED �I - -- FLOOR AREA: 93642 sq.ft. (upper level) Q /� Q
IEXIBTNG LL N
I I �,IRECTIONAL i2 j ' `li >
SI / - _ in LU Q z
- I p p
LLIo J
0
Z DIRECTIONAL- -- '��� O O
a J I SIGN 0
UJ
0)
Z; �B _ O
2 NEW I
W 'Ivi I'i BUILDING
EJ
L SHOWROOM j
\� °o (2 LEVELS) '
U) I o 20,986 SIF
c
o I o srRCAK Revisions:
GowA K
No: Revision: Date:
G
10'-0'BUILDING
ED I DIRECTIONAL SETBACK
ofI SIGN I
ca vv 0 —
2 �T1
s 1
j Certification:
I hereby certify Met this plan,specl0nton or report
was prepared by me or under my direct supero Bion
4 and that I am a duty Licensed Architect under the
j I 10 EXISTIN CADI LAC-� -EXIS NG MESSA E CADILLAC CERTIFIEb MORRIE'S LUXURY / I IawS of the State of Minnesota.
j I PYLON SIGN BOAR PRE-OWNED RYLON AUTO PYLON SIGN
rn UILDING -15' ING
10'-018 SETBACK
%
i SIGH LOCATED)' SETBACK ' Dann M.Lindahl
j% --- - - SETBACK I Date:D425(14 License No: 15248
ry � �_ - - Drawing:
-- ----------------------------------------------
- SITE AND
s
/ HIGHWAY 1 - 394 SIGNAGE
o.
PLAN
IV
Sheet No:
a
on 0 15' 30' 60' A l 00
0
NORTH
1
SITE PLAN
--------- --------------------------------------- --------------------
1 - EXTERIOR BOLLARD LIGHT FIXTURE "AA" .L.
1 fi
1
7, 777, 71,
KBR8 LED
LEG Specr+,�„Gr,Sollard Darwin Lindahl Architects,P.A.
4124 Quebec Ave.North,Suite 106
1 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55427
Ph:763.560.0446 Fax:763.5m 1
/ bmod ctian
e-mail:IindahlerchQgmail
THIS DRAWINGAND THE INFORMATION THEREIN m TME
E%./ PROPERTY OF DARWIN OR DISC LOSURECIS,PA ITS
USE
HOLDER WRHRE TO OTHERS
OLTTT THE WRITTEN PEReeRIDN OF DARWIN
SPeaf tlo^� I - ' LCONTAINS PROPRIIEETARYA AIND TIT
INFORMATIONO
REPRODUCTION
DARWIN UNOAHL ARCHITECTS,PA
PRODUCTION OF THE MATERIAL HERON WITHOUT
WRITTEN PERMISSDN OF DARWIN UNDANL
Hit ARCHTIECTS,PA VIOLATES THE COPYWRITE LAWS OF
THE UNITED STATES AND WILL SU6IECT THE
vi
DIATORS TO LEGAL PROSECUTION,
1
I e COPYRI(aR6ID13 BY DARWIN LINOARL ARLHRECTS,PA
EX.,\ — EX. – Project#: 2013-30
I EXTERIOR SOFFIT LIGHT FIXTURE "BB”
1
1
I EX .�_ L/THON/A LIGHTING O
I 1
� FEATURES&SPEpFN:ATIONS
Z
I -- . . . _ DOM >
UJ
I
1 EX DoM8 LED w
a°aa,e,o
Z I �— _
UJI
Q 1 SOFFIT I 1 Z
LU
Z I LIGHTING
(TYPIto.) C B I � O V, LU
a Q I Ex 4e b i I _' d O J
Za >I I I--- 'R I ... O � � /�
J J 1 WALL PACK rZ_ V
d ` , EXTERIOR LIGHT
FIXTURE ITYP.)coo
0 Z. D NEW D 1 O
o UJ I 19 V, BUILDING
LU �� °o LL SHOWROOM 1
�o Ex. (2 LEVELS)
c o 20,986 SF cCI i
o.
D
n q D°o ee e, EXTERIOR WALL PACK LIGHT FIXTURE "CC"
AA AA Revisions:
o I Ex. O 1 No: Revision: Date:
a' D X���G �� I D-Series Size 2
1 \ _ uc TNLIGHTI G( P) LEG Wall L merarre
W I
0 EX.
1 SP�ciecations _ _ ,,.
d i luew"awe Eae4 Dor iaff%'
_P.
K.
v
o Certification:tifi
w D I�reeeartify/L//Capt/�caban,orreport
Q i I L11�L1LL111L[M7:1 �_ ��~- LJ 4 v and than a duly Ucaread ArchReG under the
\\ was Prepared by The or under my direct supervision
I'I laws of the State of Minnesota.
1 I
m
aI 1 Darwin M.Lintlehl
p - EX. _ - .. __ - _ -- NOTES: Date:U4/25H4 License No: 15248
SHIELDS TO BE PROVIDED AS REQUIRED TO MEET MAXIMUM ILLUMINATION
1 Q - - -- Q - -- �*-- -- -- - Q. - - j AT PROPERTY LINE OF ONE-HALF FOOT CANDLES. Drawing:
------------ - --_ _ ... _ _.-. - _ _
-
c? PHOTOMETRIC SITE PLAN TO BE SUBMITTED TO CIN FOR APPROVAL PRIOR
------------- TO SITE LIGHTING INSTALLATION.
EXTERIOR
s HIGHWAY 1 - 394 LIGHTING
I
Q PLAN
a
N
Sheet No:
a
015, 30' 6 A1 01
NORTH
N EXTERIOR LIGHTING PLAN
�`— T—— LEGEND
'— — r ——.,— — ——— — — —---a. — — � CURB&GUTTERR STANDARD DUTY
r�PRO
V
I PROPOSED EXISTING
aaa. . - — —— — — r —— — r EASEMENT ------ ASPHALT PAVING
� i
a.
i BUILDING
RETAINI
LL
ETLAND L LIMITS —�— 14800 28N An K BOB 140
.N - - CONCRETE PAVING MIDIIBSUIB 55M7
TUNE
SAWCUTR E r=476.6MO talefilegilis
--` SIGN T fB31478.8532 facsimile
+ W O EXISTING PAVEMENT
PIPE BOLLARD • wwwinftcom
O REMAIN
NUMBER PARKING
z
T `; KEYSTALLS NOTE Client ROW O Client
\ v b LEF KEYNOTTE O LANDSCAPE AREA
[ > 2 I I I P$LEE ANLANDSCAPE 1
MORRIE S
DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY AUTOMOTIVE
Z. ... AREA
'-_ _%-_... -._ —.._ -- _ BLOCK 4.6 AC GROUP
� LOT 1,BL
- Lor z,Bloat 1.a Ac 12520 WAYZATA BOULEVARD
R.O.W. 3.0 AC
+ > ¢' � � I � MINNETONKA,MN 55305
J re
LOTS 1&2
IMPERVIOUS
EX STING 210:91SF 87%
PROPOSED 210,918 86%
BUILDING AREA 67,fi7,195 IF
_ + W BUILDING COVERAGE 28%
a IDT1 Project
IMPERVIOUS
1 EXISTING 175,872 IF5 IF 8]%
PR
POSEDIDGA I75,R755,SS87% MORRIE'S
IF
BUILDING COVERAGE 28% LUXURY AUTO
1 / _ IMPERVIOUS
EXISTING 38,564IF 89%
-NPROPOSED 35,046 IF 80%
\r♦ ' 4.K " r LOT 1 - BUILDING AREA 11,640 IF TOTAL
(11,640 IF FOOTPRINT)
--J �F BUILDING COVERAGE 27%
1� ci
PARKING PROVIDED 28 STALLS Location
t �
DEVELOPMENT NOTES GOLDEN
m
n r'
A. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE ROUNDED TOTHENEARESTTENTHFOOT. VALLEY,
MN
B. ALLDIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TOTHE FACE OF CURB UNLESSOTHERWISE NOTED. 7400 WAYZATA BLVD.
I
C. ALL AREAS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST SQUARE FOOT.
D. ALL PARKING STALLS TO BE 9'IN WIDTH AND I85IN LENGTH UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED.
- 1 !j i I i �•� �_j E. REFERTO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF EXIT PORCHES,RAMPS,
1 ... _ PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND EXACT BUILDING UTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS,
PROPOSED BUILDING awl` SEEARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR SIGNAGE DETAILS
R( J P IL
+ 1 OCK ' 209865.0 -
L FFE=886.0 G. SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR LIGHT POLE FOUNDATION DETAIL AND FOR EXACT LOCATIONS OF LIGHT
r
=r
Nr -
T PDLE Certification
+j( 84.5
LOT __ H. REFER TO FINAL PLAT FOR LOT BOUNDARIES,LOT NUMBERS,LOT AREAS,AND LOT DIMENSIONS hereby certfy that this plan,specfcaton or
report was prepared by—or under my d-rest
W+ 4 ( I. ALL GRADI ENTS ON 51 DEWALKS ALONG THE ADA ROUTE SHALL HAVE A MAXIMUM LONGITUDINAL SLOPE supervision and that;—a duly;,tensed
U. ! OF5%(1:20),EXCEPT AT CURB RAMPS(1:12),AND AMAXIMUM CROSS SLOPE OF 2.08%(1:48).THE professonal ENGINEER under thelaws AT the state
r
MAXIMUM SLOPE IN ANY DIRECTION ON AN ADA PARKING STALL OR ACCESS ISLE SNAIL BE 2.08 of Nlnnesota
%(1:48).
f. ( THECONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW AND VERIFY THE GRADIENT IN THE FIELD ALONG THE ADA ROUTES
- ---__ , RIOR TO PLACING CONCRETE OR BITUMINOUS.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER
—_ 1 MMEDIATELVIF THERE ISA DISCREPANCY BETWEENTHE GRADIENTIN THE FIELD VERSUSTHE DESIGN
N A` P
-L I
i GRADIENT.
6 Brady D.Busselman
r f "NO PARKING"SIGNS SHALL BE PLACED ALONG ALL DRIVEWAYS ASREQUIRED BV CI Ty.
Registrar,,No 44579 Data:02/21/2014
ee
If app;cable contatt us for a wet signed wof this
planwsavaRable upon request a[MFXARA,Inc,
B W Plymouth,th,MN office
KEYNOTES
A. BUILDING,STOOPS,STAIRS SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. Summary
r I
N
n, F - QSIgnB:BDB GDA Drawn:3MT
11
+ - ; L' B. 8-612 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER.
scl: N i
� , . � � 4 .� ,.1a= I�.�y`1`.�13 t`•.:t 1L,G:�..7: APProved:BDe Book/Page:
�� C. FLAT CURB SECTION. Phase:PRELIMINARY Initial Issued:02/21/2014
2 D. ACCESSIBLE RAMP. ry
! ,r
Revision Histo
1 _
E. CURB CUT.SEE DETAIL 1,5HEET C7.01. No.Date By Submittal/Revision
---
A 03/13/19 IMT Uptla[etl Su—y&
I `0 ' swrmwaterManagementRevs—
B 0x/25/14 IMT Final PUO Plans
neA_Et ,rP •X,1. :0`321>
1
I
i 1
i
-- J— --- i- __-----.+--
+ s 'k _ ___ ________________________ ---------------------------------- -____—_,_t E J
�4 Kahn FE3 DOC. hCi. 56323 —
+ - 'a N89'59'19'W 495.20
TcACIF.S..' o
+ R O.W.-DEDICATI N-- -
�--.-- . Sheet Title
°--- + SITE PLAN
I
I r'1
+
1
------------ – – -- ----- -------'--------- ------------------------------ --- - --
'------ - W Sheet No. Revision
NORTH
U 0 30 50
SCALE IN FEET C31 4101 V R
+ a
+ INTERSTATE HIGHWAY NO. 394 +
I A„y Project No.MOR19974
PLANTING MATERIAL SCHEDULE
LOUM Siff 8001 BOTwIGLNANE WNAME
A e S T5ATWLAN—MPWLE' IMPEPoAL HONEY LODIST
e J r In MAlus'-11 snow' GSNOINR FRNGc
L 2 BSB —a MARE ISINL+E STFMI
I --tA — 11 ANGuu ANsusnFaw TllGcarE EARF M�uGG PNS
D 3GK Poi CAIAMAGROSTIS A—FLO- KwLNERmE F-GPA40
E 10 3GAL Poi PWUS MUTO TEENY TEENY
MI-JIM -1
ER
� I F � JGu Poi uM HIGLGT
I
H GAL PGT EUDNYMUSFORTUNEI COLOIwTUS IGLMYMDBwwTERLREEPER Darwin Lindahl Architects,P.A.
_ s to sGu PoT IUMPERusHauzaNruls cGPPERGnI mP RUGHT,uNIPER 4124 Quebec Ave.North,Suite 106
1 K B JGaI Po, Rpa,A, O vnLo Minneapolis, Minnesota 55427
1 , Ex / i / / i / / Ph:763.560.0448 Fax:763.560.0441
60 PMUS NWRA'ARNOLOSEMwEL' ARMaO SENnNELwSTRMN PINE
mail lindahlarchogmail.com
/ tJ — POT IbsTA 9REAMWEANER DREAM—ER HOSTA THIS
S THE
I ACA3TACNE iORiUNF DRAWING INFORMATION I
PROPERTY OF DARWIN U-141.ARCHTTCTS,PA ITS
N sl JGAI E HOLDER OR
/ PoT RUE BLUE FORTUNEwaE NYeSOP USWmgIOT S THE WRITTENN PEMISSION
ROFO OTHER
/ /j% UNDAHL ARCHITECTS, PA IS PROHIBITED IT
1
CONTAIN PROPRIETARY AN NT
INFORMATION OF DARWIN L ARCHITECTS,PA
REPRODUCTION OF THE MATERIAL HEREIN WTHOUT
UNDAHL
WRITTEN PERMISSION TH DARWM L WS OF
ARCHITECTS PAVIOLATES THE IU- SURELAWSOF
RAIN GARDCOMBS ATION OF NEW ENGLANDASTER,PURPLE CONE THE UNITED STATES AND WILL SUBJECT THE
- VIOLATORS TO LEGAL PROSECUTION.
\ FLOWER,JOE PYE WEED AND BLUE FLAG IRIS. DOPmIGHT 020133BY DARWIN LINDAHL ARCHITECTS,PA
1 LAWN IRRIGATION NOTES: Project#. 2013-30
1
1.LAWN IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO BE A DESIGN-BUILD.SUBMIT DESIGN TO
1-A ARCHITECT FOR REVIEW.
2.ALL NEW S00 AREAS SHALL BE IRRIGATED WITH UNDERGROUND LAWN
IRRIGATION SYSTEM SPRINKLER HEAD TO BE TYPE THAT WILL MINIMIZE OVER
._ SPRAY ON VEHICLES,AND OR BUILDING.
\ O\ 3.ALL NEW LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL BE IRRIGATED WITH UNDERGROUND LAWN
IRRIGATION SYSTEM SPRINKLER HEADS TO BE TYPE THAT MINIMIZE OVER
1 SPRAY ON VEHICLES,AND OR BUILDING.
/ I I
1-k 4.PROVIDE BUBBLE TYPE HEADS AT LANDSCAPE AREA NEXT TO WINDOWS.I
1 5.LAWN IRRIGATION SHALL CONNECT TO BUILDING. Q Z
W I1 6,PROVIDE P.V.C.PIPE SLEEVES UNDER PAVED AREAS AS REQUIRED, O
\\ 7.COORDINATE LAWN IRRIGATION SYSTEM WITH GENERAL CONTRACTOR,AND A/I m 1 I ALL SUB-CONTRACTORS THAT MAYBE AFFECTED. {Ij�
W
12-H 2-C X
00 o LU z
LU
—I EX.
�� Elul C)
O J
Z /"i � BBB i I , � � r� A✓
L7 Z I EX. EX. I� soul 0
a I 1 Ex. NEW i O
LIZJ ;/ BUILDING
o I a l I SHOWROOM
5 I (2 LEVELS) 1
20,986 SF '.I
g I 1_A SE I
SE
t
.� Revisions:
0 rn
No: Revision: Date:
�a' ULl -
I I '* &
5-F
K II.
O \
� I BJ ,B —
1 A 1
2- -D 3J 2- J -D 3j�
D
� 1 —
1 EX.
I
Certification:
A
, �5op`4 4 -�--r11 56.0
J hereby Cattily that a or plan,my dinidon or repo
I was preparetl by me or under my direct supervision
= I E%. -' and that I am a duly L Lensed Amhi under the
—EX. RAIN GARDENS I laws of theStateStat^atte of Minnesota
1 'lam
J 1 I
m I 1 Darwin M.Undahl
Date.0425114 License No: 16248
o
r 4 4 _ _ _ 4 __ 4 - _ _ 4 - �
m I--- ---------------------- _ Drawing:
1
-- ----------------------------------------------- LANDSCAPING
o I
a
g HIGHWAY 1 - 394 PLAN
Q
a_
N
Sheet No:
a
N 0 15' 30' 60' Al O 2
o
NORTH
N 4 LANDSCAPING PLAN
LEGEND
EXIST CONSTRUCTION TO REMAIN
uo1
� NEW STEEL STUD CONSTRUCTION
NEW CMU CONSTRUCTION
EXIST DOOR TO REMAIN 16' :)-L- A•�.
/- /� ��J; NEW DOOR 8 FRAME
1 l
12 /
2'-0' JJY
28• .4" 6'-0• 24'-0^ Darwin lindahl Architects,P.A.
,•-0 27-
4124 Quebec Ave.North,Suite 106
APPROVED VENDOR NOTES: Minneapolis, Minnesota 55427
LOGO SCREENS,SERVICE WRITE-UP DESK,SERVICE Ph:763.560.0448 Fax:763.560.0441
MENU BOARD,FRAMED ART WORK AND PRODUCT mail:lindehlerch(�gmail.com
--- —1 — — — — B INFORMATION CENTER LOWINMAY BE PURCHASED �
T FROMONEOF THEFOLLOWINGFABRICATORS:
THIS DRAW INOAND THE INfoliM IS 1HEREM IS THE
PROPERTY OF—IN OR
ARCHITECTS.PA RS
USE BY THE HOLDER OR DISCL0uON TO OTHERS
DCI MARKETING WITHOUT THE LINpAHL ARCHITECTS, PARM��OHIBROF�wIIT
300 W.BIG BEAVER CONTAINS PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENIUL
/ TROY,MI 48064 INFORMATION OF DM AN UNI-1L ARCHITECTS,PA
\ REPRODUCTION OF THE MATERIAL HEREIN WITHOUT
JONSLAKELY WRTTEN PERMISSION OF DARWW UN—
/ T— 248-6499600 ARCHITECTS,PA VIOIATES THE COPYWRlE IAWS OF
O \ BLAI(ELYGDCIM.COM ouiR9TE -PSETINW m THE
GAROSECUO,
- COPYRIOIR O M13 BY DARWIN LINDAIL—ITEM,PA
NOTE Project#: 2013-30
'PI 7TJ 7-7 1. EXISTING INTERIOR DOORSIFRAMES TO REMAIN
/ I? SHALL BE PAINTED TO MATCH ADJACENT WALL
/1096y ST IRC SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE C
O O COLOR.
UP
74
MEN MEN tl O
./� COFFEE m
II
(HALL Io rmlHALL, ,(ten ,(1, (a�
LouNa?
II II Q Q
vT WOMEN WOMEN/ O C
,i Ili j�A9Z �'1'�%N •� �_��/ c LL G
ELEVATOR �' \,f� m
i JAN. EQUIPMENT
EEI
Q Z
LU
C/) LU
v SHOWROOM III�� /`. may` � METAL FRAMING PARTITION SCHEDULE W O D
SALES II TAIR ( STAIR c„1/` (),r' -./
z /
i �'
i
Q O 'I 4 SHOWROOM \ / 19 � r`
I � SIZE GA. ARK
� �� � I � MARK LOCATION REM S Q.
a
pO ® TI / -L � f (�\ \ ���O STUDS AT7d"OC %•
® �j I „''—\ I� YI�I V / ���I_ �� _ _ GYPSUM BOARD ON EACH O
LL _ _. _ _ II — F INTERIOR SIDE ffiz"FIBERGLASS
_3 PARTITION 1 3%• 26oR
LL 7AUES] I' -- %( A BATT INSULATION,EXTEND C
ff I�
WITH SOUND 6' 16 C
> d ' �, �lJ // 'r TO STRUCTURE ABOVE;
ATTENUATION
`DENOTES 6'3TUD
— — _ — — — (SEE STRUCT)
rc)IIrD7 PPl STUDS AT 1'-0"O.C.;® INTERIOR GYPSUM BOARD ON EACH
PARTITION 3%- 25oR SIDE;EXTEND TO
6WIT.UTS.UND a+6' 16 j STRUCTURE ABOVE;
LOBBY ` ATTENUATION EENSTRUCT)sTUORevisions:
""–� -- �., �� TYPICAL No: Revision: Date:
6"a GYPSUM BOARD ON EACH
pI \ PLUMBING STUDS AT 1'-0'O.C.;ra
n; /T C PARTITION WITH B. SIDE,EXTEND TO —
�\� SOUND I STRUCTURE ABOVE
– – – itECEPTiBN-�+– – –�— – ATTENUATION
RECEPTI N _
INTERIOR
I / \
FON URRING FIRING @ V4"O.C.;
TTV �FU
DPARTITIONS
1%" 26 BOARD:EXTEND
6"ABOVE FINISH CEILING
PARIONS —
—
m a
I
-rd
u � /
V �.�'y FURRING @ 1'-0.O C;
ENTRY O r - ,o INTERIOR GYPSUM BOARD,1!i RIGID
FURRING
E ON EXTERIOR i 25 (EXTEND TO STRUCTURE
--8�� Certification:
WALL ABOVE;\ Ihereby certify that this pian,specification,«report OMIT INSULATION�' Wee prepared by me or under my direct supervision
\ CMws U WALL-VERIFY and that l am a duly
cen
Lised Architectundar the
REINFORCING,FOOTING laof the State of Minnesota.
EXTERIOR DIMENSION S6 LOCATIONS
F MASONRY 8" WITH STRUCTURAL
E DRAWINGS;EXTEND TO elw
PARTITION STRUCTUREABOVE; Din M.Undahl
0
'DENOTES 8"CMU W1 ACM
Date:04I25114 License No: 15248
PANEL
19'4^ aY.S- _ 1D'-0• _ 1Sw j Drawing:
127-0' EXTERIOR ACM y8'PLYWOOD OVER MTL
1 G PANEL ON EXIST
WALL - STUD,IY'ACM PANEL MAIN LEVEL
a
STUDSATI'A"O.C.;," FLOOR PLAN
g GYPSUM BOARD ON EACH
uo H INTERIOR 6• 22 TO
STRUCTURE ABOVE;FRP
.Q PARTITION
ON EACH SIDE-UP TO 94'
a_ A.F.F.
N
PARTITION TO MATCH Sheet No:
g 0 4' 8' 16' J PARTITION INFILL - - EXIST ADJACENT WALL
_ TYPE A111
� NORTH NOTE:UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE,DIMENSIONS ARE FROM FACE OF
v MASONRY OR P.C.WALL PANEL&TO CENTERLINE OF INTERIOR
PARTITIONS.EXIST PARTITIONS ARE DIMENSIONED FROM FINISHED
L,1 IMAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN _ SURFACE
LEGEND
® EXIST CONSTRUCTION TO REMAIN
�8
n, 0 NEW STEEL STUD CONSTRUCTION
0 NEW CMU CONSTRUCTION
j t EXIST DOOR TO REMAIN
NEW DOOR 8 FRAME
7 s) lo) 3.8
Y v 127.0
9A +'-8 21-0' 22'-8' 16'-0" 8'-0' 24-0' Darwin Lindahl Architects,P.A.
L _.. ' � 4124 Quebec Ave.North,Suite 106
pl APPROVED VENDOR NOTES: Minneapolis, Minnesota 55427
j
LOGO SCREENS,SERVICE WRITE-UP DESK SERVICE Ph:763.560.0448 Fax:763.560.0441ODUCT e-mail:Iindahlarch(Tgmail.com
—1� — —
INFORMATINU ON
N FRAMER ARTWORK BE PURCHASE
7I" INFORMATION CENTER(P.I.C.)MAY BE PURCHASED
FROM ONE OF THE FOLLOWING FABRICATORS: THIS DMWING AND THE INFORMATION THEREIN 6 THE
PROPERTY OF OARWIN UNDAHL ARCHITECTS.RX ITS
DG MARKETING USE BY THE HOLDER OR OISCLOSURE TO OTHERS
WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF DARWIN
300 W.BIG BEAVER COR NS PROPRIETARY A AND 13 �OONFFIOE—
TROY,MI 48084 INFORMATION OF DARWIN UNOAHL ARCHITECTS,P.A.
j JON BLAKELY NRIT F CTS,DU EN OF THE
MATHRIAL�I W WIINW�HL
248849-0600 ARCHfiECTS,PA VKXATES THE CDPYWRITE tUND OF
BLAKELY@DCIM.COM THE UNITED STATES AND WILL SUBJECT THE
Y—TORS TO LEGAL PROSECUTION.
COPYRIGHT M13 BY DARWIN UNDAHL ARCHITECTS.PA
NOTE:
Project#: 2013-30
I
ON ! 1. EXISTING INTERIOR DOORSIFRAMES TO REMAIN
LOBBY ,J SHALL BE PAINTED TO MATCH ADJACENT WALL
O COLOR.
EN WOM O
HALL J
o Ik!I, 4 Q o z
—�
ON DN � �, U � J
JI (j l g LUUJ
4� E=MG o o
cj ` d O J
z O
METAL FRAMING PARTITION SCHEDULE W C)
CEVAT I� O
g �I 'n
MARK LOCATION SIZE GA. REMARKS a-
C)
~ v
1 al !I' STUDS AT BOARD O E
GYPSUM BOARD ON EACH
W 1 INTERIOR SIDE;3Y'FIBERGLASS O
J \ —_ _, �I A PART WITHISOUND 6" 216 BATTINSULATION ES NO C
U 4 SHOWROO TO STRUCTURE ABOVE; G
SHOWR00 r, _ ` F- }- ATTENUATION
•DENOTES6"STUD
(SEE STRUCT)
a -
__ STUDS AT I'-0.O.C.;4'a
INTERIOR GYPSUM BOARD ON EACH
g 11 B WITHOUTSOUND 6" 16 STRUCTURE ABOVE;
N
PARTITION 25. SIDE;EXTEND TO
r 3s/e'
t � ATTENUATION ort EESTRUCT)DENOTES 6*STUDRevisions:
IIED,
TYPICAL o Revision: Date:
PLUMBINGSTUDSATI.4'O.C,' �1' C PARTITION WITH 6^ort 22 GYPSUM BOARD ON EACH N
_ SOUND 8" SIDE;EXTEND TO
G ATTENUATION STRUCTURE ABOVE
�. ;s—_ - 1
!� I
LU
Of
- 1 tom- ! 'F'—`. INTERIOR FURRING 1'-0.O.C.;s/' —
pggp I I( II 1 —I '®1 D FURRING 14a" 25 GYPSUM BOARD;EXTEND
III �tlI `„�y,: / 4 I I I !'I !� - -: t �'I _-.� l� I) 4 PON ARTITIONS 6"ABOVE FINISH CEILING
Ai
m —
o FURRING O BOARD;
C.;I
INTERIOR GYPSUM BOARD;1Yx"RIGID
_- — — — — 1 E ONREIXTERIOR +�" INSULATION;
EXTEND TO STRUCTURECertification:
fi y
o J OMIT INSULATION�i' Ce�///Cal/On:
�— WALL ABOVE I hereby certify that this plan,specification,or report
was prepared by me or udder my direct supervision
— — —. — — — — — — — — — __ — — — — — — — — — — — _" J F MASONRY S.
-
DRAWINGS;DIMENSIONS
&LOC TO
antl that I em
Q L — CMU WALLNG,FOOTING
"oty Licensed Architect under the
WITH
r
REINFORCING,FOOTING Iews of the
State of Minnesota.
m EXTERIOR DIMENSION58 LOCATIONS
d nn M.UI
PARTITION STRUCTURE ABOVE; Dery
g
'DENOTES
B^CMU WI ACM Dae:04/25/14 License No: 15248
PANEL
21'4• _ +u'a• 19•-0' Drawin
122'-0' EXTERIOR ACM 9'
o — — G PANEL ONE%IST UPPER LEVEL
518"PLYWOOD OVER Mtt
WAIL (STUD,,z^ACM PANEL
I
ISTUDSAT,•-0"O.Q;s' FLOOR PLAN
g GYPSUM BOARD ON EACH
SIDE;EXTEND TO
y �o H INTERIOR 6. STRUCTURE ABOVE;FRP
.Q PARTITION ON EACH SIDE-UP TO 8'-0'
a_
A.F.F.
IV I
PARTITION TO MATCH Sheet No:
0 4' 8' 16' J PARTITION INFILL -- - EXIST ADJACENT WALL
6 TYPE
C; NORTH NOTE:UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE,DIMENSIONS ARE FROM FACE OF A121
Q MASONRY OR P.C.WALL PANEL 8 TO CENTERLINE OF INTERIOR
c PARTITIONS.EXIST PARTITIONS ARE DIMENSIONED FROM FINISHED
UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN RURFADF
ACM-2 FASCIAA SOFF "�B+
ACM.2"" -1 AGMsw,INs�+ ILLUMINATED CHANNEL EXTERIOR FINISHES SPECIFICATIONS
SYSTEM $ CWE MAMMAL MANUFACNRfR/S—TIAPONS y UFACNREA
ACM-2 RAINSCREEN
SYSTEM T.O.FASCIA_ AOI-I DAM:METAWC A IXC AICW OR EWAL
ELEN,3]s ALUMWUY COPOSTE DARN MFTAWC
.A...—11C MICA MFS GRAY,CLOSE W
T
O W-1 PANEL_
ILLEIMWII®CFNtYiEI. ___-_----- _ __-. ELS
• -- -- --- --------i
LETTERS ___ �______ __ __-. 7p-2 NdIE A-1.G ALGGA O,fWN
AJSORUN CgIPo9R rn+In
ELS:�2:.-0••- yARWAL MDC,XG L:)-L- A
CLEAR ALIIMNUM
CURTAIN WALL SYSTEM TO
VW CLEAR GLASS
(BUR GLAZED)
Er=v:
ILLUMINATED CHANNEL LETTERS
LETTERS A s E RA ): 8 N �'BENTLEY ab Darwin Undahl Architects,P.A.
METALPANEL_
ELEN:„D�.o" 4124 Quebec Ave.North,Suite 106
Minneapolis,Minnesota 55427
CIEARALUMINUM A4 Ph:763.560.0448 Fax:763.560.0441
CURTAIN WALL SYSTEM
CLEARGLASS e-mail lindahlar .CO
chQgmailm
(BUTT GLAZED) PPE TNS DAMMING AND THE!INFORMATION TERON R THE
,aD•4^ PROPERTY OF DMIMN UNDANL AROIIIEen,PA in
USE BY TE VOIDER OR DISDDaIE TO OTNM
ACM-1 RAWSCAEEN ALUM.OVERHEAD DOOR EXTERIOR SIGN TRADEMARK CONTOURID WALL PANEL TMTIOIR THE MmFN PERMS"OF DARWIN MONK.
SYSTEM WICLEARGLASS &LETTERS &ILLUMINATED ATON AY PAAIKI C PROHIBITED.IT CONTAINS
SOUTH ELEVATION (FRONT) BIS GARmmH MM,� T I"
TE NATDNAL DAM. 091W M PA PERIBSON
OF D/DMN IAM ABONIECIS PA NQA D i THE
MP,MBTE E VIO OF TIE UIDFD STAlE4 AND YELL
SCALE:3132"=1'-0" slBler THE N0.ATOR5 TO LLcrL PRoscvnax.
PA
SYSTEMACM.2_ OOPTg1T mil BY DNIMII LNWIC MRtlfIEC1S
Project: #2013-30
ACM-21AINSCREEN / ACM-2FASCIA&SOMT
SYSTEM T.D.F—._
E- --
METAL PA a�
O.ELEV,2 W
WALL MOUNTED LIGHTn METAL PANE Q J
J
C p ELEV. 214•
TO METKPANE_ o� Z
E ;115'4
_..-_.
SOT"
„ANEL_ Q
b-0”
/{ { O
! ALUM.OVERHEAD
ACM-1 RARJSCREEN DOOR `CLEARA UNINUM SYSTEM o° X
CEMALWALD Q Z
SYSTEM WI AIN
CI EAR GLASSQ \ Z
WEST ELEVATION (SIDE) PMS) J m
SCALE:3/32"=1'-0" �0LU QQ
ACM-2 RAINSCREEN
SYSTEM rho.FASGiA_ a Q Q
E � o
C
r`
CLEAR ALUMINUM CURTAIN UMWUM
CURTAIN WALL SYSTEM CURTAIN WALL SYSTEM Revisions:
W1 CLEAR GLASS p W1011'f ARGL No: Revision: Date.
MUTT�)
LI`
,t iT 1�
PPE
�— CIEARALUMINUM —
CURTAIN WALL SYSTEM
CLEARICHASS
NORTH ELEVATION (REAR) W
SCALE:3/32"=1'-0"
ACM-21RAINSCREEN Certification:
SYSTEM I hereby certify that this plan specification
I,
report..S prepared by—o under my
ACM@ FASCW&SOFFrf ACIA-4RIU SCREEN lire.,SupervisionI'd th.t I—I duly
ACM4 Stolteerld a tta,ander t o
ACM-1 RANSL7iEEP1
ELS--CIA SYSTEM Dat—/2s%4'Registration NO: ,s2Ab
O.MEiK PMIEL
O ELEV 2d-a
Bo.MErK PANEL WALL MOUNTED LIGHT Drawing:
0-ELEN,N4" 0 /
CLUMINUM
CURTAAL WALL SYSTEM
WI CLEAR GLASS i EXT E R I O R
GLAZED)
ELEVATIONS
*1E1
E Ev PANELNEI
115-0'
B.O.METK PANEL �,..
AM2 CANOPY
1_0
CONTOURED WALL PANEL _
Sheet No
,W D ; ALUM.OVERHEAD DOOR
'—CLEARALUMINUM WICIEARGlASS
EAST ELEVATION (SIDE) R,TT«,a) WEST ELEVATION (SIDE) A201
SYSTEM
WICLEMGLASS
SCALE&W=1'-0"
DRAFT
y X X X X X X X
r)X X X X X X X
MORRIE 'S GOLDEN VALLEY - P . U . D . NO . 115 R.T.DOC.NO.
0
°- KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS:That Wegener Properties LLC,a Minnesota limited liability company,fee I Marcus F.Hampton do hereby certify that this plat was prepared by me or under my direct supervision;that I am a
o:
IU^ NW CORNER OF THE SE 1/4 OF N LINE OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE owner,of the following described property situated in the County of Hennepin,State of Minnesota,to wit: duly Licensed Land Surveyor in the State of Minnesota;that this plat is a correct representation of the boundary
THE NW 1/4 SEC. 5, T. 117, R. 21 - - NW 1/4 SEC. 5, T. 117, R. 21 - - - - - - survey;that all mathematical data and labels are correctly designated on this plat;that all monuments depicted on
Parcel 1: this plat have been,or will be correctly set within one year;that all water boundaries and wet lands,as defined in
Minnesota Statutes,Section 505.01,Subd.3,as of the date of this certificate are shown and labeled on this Plat;and
x x x x x x x That part of the following described property lying westerly of a line drawn from a point in the all public ways are shown and labeled on this plat.
xxxxxxx
xxxxxxx
xxxxxxx southerly line of said property,distant 42.57 feet East of the Southwest corner thereof to a point
xxxxxxx
xxxxxxx in the West line of said property,distant 204.87 feet South of the Northwest corner thereof;That Dated this day of ,20_
xxxxxxx
r x x x x x x x S89'59 48'W 483.50 5 �y I part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter(SE 1/4 NW 1/4)Iying west of the East 10
m x x x x x x x L �` acres thereof and southerly of a line drawn from a point in the westerly line of said Tract,distant
__________________________________________________, r 157.13
0000000 1----------------------- t 588 feet southerly from the Northwest corner thereof,as measured along said westerly line from the
0000000 I r 30.15 I 453.35 I
0 0 0 0 0 0 o r I I 1 I Northwest corner of said Tract,to a point on the easterly line of said Tract,distant 585 feet Marcus F.Hampton,Licensed Land Surveyor,
k00000.0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i I southerly,as measured along said easterly line from the Northeast corner of said Tract,except Minnesota License No.47481
0 00 0 0 0 o I , i f the westerly 500 feet,front and rear,of the above-described property,Section 5,Township 117,
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W 1q 1 i I Range 21,and situate in Hennepin County,Minnesota.
STATE OF MINNESOTA
4 O!
Parcel 2: COUNTY OF
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20_,by Marcus
All of the following described Tract:The westerly 500 feet front and rear of the following described
Z¢ N I I I tract of property to-wit:That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter(SE1/4 NW 1/4) F.Hampton,a Licensed Land Surveyor.
O
z rn—!n-� u) I I I cV
°- rW I I Q I lying west of the East 10 acres thereof and southerly of a line drawn from a point on the westerly line
w W U, Q F W ,
N¢Z_ y 1 I s of said Tract 588 feet southerly from the Northwest corner thereof as measured along said westerly line
w U 3 U w I Z I from the Northwest corner of said Tract,to a point on the easterly line of said Tract distant 585 feet
=o¢ti I , Notary Public, County,Minnesota Notary Printed Name
z o - Z^ , I southerly as measured along said easterly line from the Northeast corner of said Tract,Section 5,
�2 I My Commission Expires
O x Township 117,Range 21,except that part which lies easterly of a line drawn from a paint in the North
U 03 o _ -' I 3 z I I I line of said property distant 16.5 feet West of the Northeast corner thereof to a point in the East line of said
w O Z wLOT 1 i 1 _ I property,distant 204.87 feet south of the Northeast corner thereof,and situate in Hennepin County,Minnesota. Golden Valley,MINNESOTA
N 0
(nUj
w o I pt m ; '-- I Has caused the same to be surveyed and platted as MORRIE'S GOLDEN VALLEY-P.U.D.NO.115,and does hereby This plat of MORRIE'S GOLDEN VALLEY-P.U.D.NO.115 was approved and accepted by the City Council of Golden
w a U donate and dedicate to the public for public use forever the public ways,and does also dedicate the easements as Valley,Minnesota,at a regular meeting thereof held this day of 20 .If applicable,the
«;
x O N¢ p___ S89'54�53'it 13192_ ___KI 1
~ �"� shown on this plat for drainage and utility purposes only.
.� , - written comments and recommendations of the Commissioner of Transportation and the County Highway Engineer
i
¢~ �r -------------------n _""_s have been received by the Cit or the prescribed 30-da period has elapsed without receipt of such comments and
.D• BLOCK 1 43;� II In witness whereof said Wagener Properties LLC,a Minnesota limited liability company,has caused these presents to y y p y p p p
I , I I recommendations,as provided by Minnesota Statutes,Section 505.03,Subdivision 2.
��'i be signed by its proper officer this day of 20_
-_• �Y, I� r r r
` - IW Wagener Properties LLC,a Minnesota limited liability company
U.W
City Council,Golden Valley,Minnesota
I .ti >
li _ N�<„ SIGNED: By; Mayor By: Clerk
ui Q I i I I I W l li H
Z 1 I i Ci By. as
LOT 2 RESIDENT AND REAL ESTATE DEPARTMENT,Hennepin County,Minnesota
1 u�
I > ml I n I i p, _ 0 O STATE OF MINNESOTA
V) C '-'I 1 LVA I I uS •- I w O I hereby certify that taxes payable in 20_and prior years have been paid for land described on this plat,dated this
¢ n to I N, 04 N __ jyyW��� COUNTY OF day 0f 20_
Y 1 WI
I I "-. I U 3
I W ;¢Z00
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20_by
a CL I I i I I ,as of Wagener Properties LLC,a Mark V.Chapin,County Auditor
Minnesota limited liability company,on behalf of the corporation.
lly � 1 pi I �III
O Z I Ni I DRIVEWAY EASEMENT 'r ILII = I By: ,Deputy
PER DOG NO.1033214CD
1 , i I 18i I Notary Public, County,Minnesota Notary Printed Name
w __ , ------------------------- ------ ----------rr_ y^ SURVEY DIVISION,Hennepin County,Minnesota
/7 i I 1 T "I'II„ My Commission Expires
I �� I I,II
OU 30 m DRIVEWAY EASEMENT PER DOC.NO.1033214<� I Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 3838.565(1969),this plat has been approved this day of
U I I n b I I '� lll� 20_
Y -L r--------------- ---------L------ r----- 152.79 1-r
¢ �� I___ __________________________________________________ L-_____-________-
K I I ,County Surveyor
w I S89'59'19'E r I
Of RESTRICTED ACCESS TO 1-394
O PER DOC.NO.2417782 N.UNE EASEMENT PER DOC.NO.562323
I
DO I By.
n I O DENOTES 1/2 INCH BY 141NCH IRON MONUMENT
H
� SET AND MARKED BY LICENSE N0.47481.
> HIGHWAY EASEMENT PER DOC.NO.562328- I • DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND. REGISTRAR OF TITLES,Hennepin County,Minnesota
w I
ck f I iW
EDr j I 1 hereby certify that the within plat of MORRIE'S GOLDEN VALLEY-P.U.D.NO.115 was filed in this office this
THE WEST LINE OFTHE SE 1/4 OF THE NW I/4, day of 20_,at_o'clock_
Z, _ _
I I SECTION 5,TWP.117,RGE.21,IS ASSUMED TO HAVE A .M.
------------ -----------------
- >-----'--------'--'—r —r BEARING OF NORTH OS DEGREES 38 MINUTES 44
1
� � I SECONDS EAST. Martin McCormick,Registrar of Titles
W INTERSTATE HIGHWAY NO. 394
L-jHIGHWAY EASEMENT I I 8y; ,Deputy
r PER DOG NO.155(1 I
(WAYZATA BLVD) I I DRAINAGEAND UTILITY EASEMENTSARE SHOWN THUS:
(NOT TO SCALE)
r I i I II
t r 6+l
l
5000 4257 t 57289 - I I
S89'57'28'E 542.57 I-S LINE OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE I�6
NW 1/4 SEC. 5, T. 117, R. 21 6 6
—�----U I-----E—
NORTH
0 50 100 BEING 6 FEET IN WIDTH,UNLESS OTHERWISE
iiiiia INDICATED,AND ADJOINING LOT LINES AND
SCALE IN FEET ADJOINING RIGHT-OF-WAY LINES,AS SHOWN MFRA, INC.
ON THE PLAT. ENGINEERING,PLANNING
AND LAND SURVEYING
ORDINANCE NO. 518, 2ND SERIES
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE
Approval of Final Plan of Development
Morrie's Golden Valley (Maserati & Bentley Dealership) P.U.D. No. 115
Morrie's Automotive Group, Applicant
The City Council for the City of Golden Valley hereby ordains as follows:
Section 1. City Code Chapter 11 entitled "Land Use Regulations (Zoning)" is
amended in Section 11.10, Subd. 2, and Section 11.55, by approving the Final Plan of
Development for Planned Unit Development (P.U.D.) 115, thereby allowing the
applicant to develop an additional, standalone, dealership within the existing parking lot
at 7400 Wayzata Boulevard.
This PUD is subject to all of the terms of the permit to be issued including, but
not limited to the following specific conditions:
1. The plans prepared by mfra and Darwin Lindahl Architects, dated April 25, 2014,
submitted with the application shall become a part of this approval.
2. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Public
Works Department to Mark Grimes, Community Development Director, dated May
19, 2014, shall become a part of this approval.
3. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Fire
Department to Mark Grimes, Community Development Director, dated May 19,
2014, shall become a part of this approval.
4. Access to the newly created Lot 2 shall be maintained via a driveway easement.
5. The Final Plat shall include "P.U.D. No. 115" in its title.
6. A park dedication fee of$80,640, or 2% of the land value, shall be paid before Final
Plat approval.
7. All signage must meet the requirements of the City's Sign Code (Section 4.20).
8. This approval is subject to all other state, federal, and local ordinances, regulations,
or laws with authority over this development.
In addition the Council makes the following findings pursuant to City Code
Section 11.55, Subd. 6(Q):
1. The PUD plan is tailored to the specific characteristics of the site and achieves a
higher quality of site planning and design than generally expected under
conventional provisions of the ordinance.
2. The PUD plan preserves and protects substantial desirable portions of the site's
characteristics, open space and sensitive environmental features including steep
slopes, trees, scenic views, creeks, wetlands and open waters.
3. The PUD plan includes efficient and effective use (which includes preservation) of
the land.
4. The PUD plan results in development compatible with adjacent uses and is
consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and redevelopment plans and goals.
5. The PUD plan is consistent with preserving and improving the general health, safety
and general welfare of the people of the City.
Ordinance No. 518 -2-
6. The PUD plan meets the PUD Intent and Purpose provision and all other PUD
ordinance provisions.
7. The PUD plan proposes a significant improvement to the parking lot and drive aisles.
8. The PUD plan proposes a new and unique use of pervious pavers.
Section 2. The tract of land affected by this ordinance is legally described as
follows:
Lots 1 and 2, Block 1 Morrie's Golden Valley P.U.D. No. 115
Section 3. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions
Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Sec. 11.99
entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as
though repeated verbatim herein.
Section 4. This ordinance shall take effect from and after its passage and
publication as required by law.
Adopted by the City Council this 17th day of June, 2014.
/s/Joanie Clausen
Joanie Clausen, Mayor Pro Tem
ATTEST:
/s/Kristine A. Luedke
Kristine A Luedke, City Clerk
city 0
I!' 1.2�e
golden MEMORANDUM
valley Police Department
763-593-8079/763-593-8098(fax)
Executive Summary For Action
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
June 17, 2014
Agenda Item
6. A. On-Sale, Sunday Sale Liquor License Renewals
Prepared By
Stacy A. Carlson, Chief of Police
Jim Roberts, Sergeant
Summary
The following establishments have applied for renewal of their liquor licenses for the 2014-2015
license term. The applicants meet City Code and State requirements for the renewal of their
licenses.
On-Sale and Sunday Sale
Samurai Inc d/b/a Benihana
*Teresa's LLC d/b/a Teresa's Mexican Restaurant
*Approval of liquor license shall be contingent on applicant paying outstanding utility bill as
required in Section 2.21 of the City Code.
Recommended Action
Motion to approve the renewal of the respective liquor licenses for the applicants listed above
for the 2014-2015 license term.
city 0
golden
MEMORANDUM
valleyPlanning Department
763-593-8095/763-593-8109(fax)
Executive Summary For Action
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
June 17, 2014
Agenda Item
6. B. Bottineau Transitway Update
Prepared By
Jason Zimmerman, City Planner
Summary
Following a County-led public hearing on May 7, 2014, and a Golden Valley Joint Commission
Meeting on May 15, 2014, the City of Golden Valley approved its letter commenting on the Draft
Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) on May 20, 2014. The letter was submitted to Hennepin
County prior to the comment period deadline of May 29, 2014.
The next step in the process will be the selection of an engineering team to lead the project
development phase of work. This is expected to last two years and will outline in more detail the
exact alignment of the tracks and the location of the station platforms, as well as the potential
station infrastructure necessary to support operations. City Engineer Jeff Oliver will be assisting in
the interviewing of the engineering teams. Selection is expected by late summer.
The Bottineau LRT Planning Advisory Committee did not meet during the DEIS comment period,
but is expected to meet with the station area planning consultants in July. In early June, the
station area Technical Advisory Committee which consists of staff from Golden Valley,
Minneapolis, Hennepin County, and Metro Transit met with the consultants to examine the
context in which the potential Bottineau stations would be set. Open houses for the station areas
are tentatively being planned for August, October, and December.
Recommended Action
Motion to receive and file Bottineau Transitway Update.