Loading...
01-06-15 CC Agenda Packet (entire) AGENDA Regular Meeting of the City Council Golden Valley City Hall 7800 Golden Valley Road Council Chamber January 6, 2015 6:30 pm The Council may consider item numbers 1, 2, 3, 5 and 6 prior to the public hearings scheduled at 7 pm 1. CALL TO ORDER PAGES A. Roll Call B. Pledge of Allegiance C. Presentation: Linda Johnson for her years of service on Robbinsdale School Board 2. ADDITIONS AND CORRECTIONS TO AGENDA 3. CONSENT AGENDA Approval of Consent Agenda - All items listed under this heading are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no discussion of these items unless a Council Member or citizen so requests in which event the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda. A. Approval of Minutes - City Council Meeting December 16, 2014 3-12 B. Set Time and Place of Agenda Closing 13 C. Designation of Official Newspaper 14 D. Designation of Depositories for City Funds 15-01 15-17 E. Approval of Check Register 1. City 18 2. Housing and Redevelopment Authority 19 F. Licenses: 1. Solicitor's License - Wisdom Executives, Inc. 20-22 2. Solicitor's License - Working America AFL-CIO 23-25 G. Minutes of Boards and Commissions: 1. Planning Commission - November 24 and December 8, 2014 26-54 2. Open Space & Recreation Commission - October 27, 2014 55-58 3. Joint Water Commission - October 28, 2014 59-60 4. Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission - October 16, 2014 61-67 H. Appointment of Assistant Weed Inspectors 68 I. Emails Regarding METRO Blue Line Extension 69 J. Approval of Plat - Ski Hill Park 15-02 70-72 K. Approve Master Partnership Contract between Golden Valley and State of MN 15-03 73-89 L. Resolution Relating to the Financing of Capital Equipment; Establishing Compliance 90-93 with Reimbursement Bond Regulations under the Internal Revenue 15-04 M. Approval of use of Credit Cards for Purchases 94-95 N. Approval of Plat - Brunswick Estates 15-05 96-98 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS 7 PM A. Public Hearing for 2015, 2016 and 2017 Pavement Management Program 15-06 99-156 B. Public Hearing - Ordinance #535 - Approval of Conditional Use Permit 138, 905 157-170 Decatur Avenue North - Our World Shops, Inc., Applicant C. Public Hearing - Preliminary PUD Plan for Struthers Parkinson's Center PUD No. 39, 171-221 Amendment #4 - 6681 & 6701 Country Club Drive - Park Nicollet Methodist Hospital, Applicant D. Public Hearing - Ordinance #536 - Amending Section 11.03 Definitions, Section 11.35 222-250 Light Industrial Zoning District and 11.36 Industrial Zoning District regarding Recycling Centers 5. OLD BUSINESS 6. NEW BUSINESS A. Reset Meeting Dates 251 B. Council Assignment - Mayor Pro Tem C. First Consideration - Ordinance #537 - Amending Chapter 5: Alcoholic Beverages 252-259 Licensing and Regulations D. First Consideration - Ordinance #538 - Amending the 2015 Master Fee Schedule for 260-261 New Liquor License Fees E. Announcements of Meetings F. Mayor and Council Communications 7. ADJOURNMENT UNOFFICIAL MINUTES CITY COUNCIL MEETING GOLDEN VALLEY, MINNESOTA December 16, 2014 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Harris called the meeting to order at 6:30 pm. 1A. Roll Call Present: Mayor Harris, Council Members Fonnest, Clausen, Schmidgall and Snope. 1B. Pledge of Allegiance 1C. Winter Recreation: Fat Tire Biking at Brookview Golf Operations Manager Disch and Assistant Golf Operations Manager Straw provided information on Fat Tire Biking at Brookview Golf Course. 2. ADDITIONS AND CORRECTIONS TO AGENDA MOTION made by Council Member Fonnest, seconded by Council Member Clausen to amend the agenda of December 16, 2014, as revised the addition of: 3C5-Therapeutic Massage Facility License Renewal-ME Golden Valley, LLC, 3C6-Therapeutic Massage Facility License Renewal- Artistic Urges LLC and 3G-Receive additional correspondence regarding METRO Blue Line Extension and the motion carried unanimously. MOTION made by Council Member Snope, seconded by Council Member Clausen to approve the amended agenda of December 16, 2014, and the motion carried unanimously. 3. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA MOTION made by Council Member Schmidgall, seconded by Council Member Snope to approve the consent agenda of December 16, 2014, as revised: addition of 3C5-Massage Facility License Renewal-ME Golden Valley,3C6-Massage Facility License Renewal-Artistic Urges LLC and 3G-Receive additional correspondence regarding METRO Blue Line and removal of 3C1-General Business License, 3C4-Fireworks Permit for Sweeney Lake Homeowner's Association, 3F2-Authorize Contract for trimming and removal of trees, 3K- Resolution for approval of Plat - Hanson Wood Shores, 3N 1-Authorize Agreement for Water Quality Improvements, 3R-Authorization to sign the Towing Contract for Vehicle Impound and 3W-Resolution Authorizing Execution of Amendment to Agreement with Urban Hennepin County and the motion carried unanimously. 3A1. Approve Minutes of City Council Meeting - December 2, 2014 3131. Approve City Check Register and authorize the payments of the bills as submitted. 3132. Approve Housing and Redevelopment Authority Check Register and authorize the payments of the bills as submitted. 3C1. Approve GeneFal Business Lirenses. 3C2. Approve City gambling licenses as follows: Chester Bird American Legion Post#523; Golden Valley VFW Post #7051, Minnesota Youth Athletic Services and Crystal Lions. 3C3. Approve Gambling License Exemption and Waiver of Notice Requirement - Northwest Suburban Chapter of Pheasants Forever. 3C4. Approve Fireworks Permit feF Sweeney Lake Homeowner's AsSOGiation. 3D. Accept for filing the Minutes of Boards and Commissions as follows: 1. Human Rights Commission - October 23, 2014 2. Human Services Fund - October 13, 2014 Unofficial City Council Minutes -2- December 16, 2014 3. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA - continued 3D. Accept for filing the Minutes of Boards and Commissions - continued 3. Environmental Commission - October 27, 2014 4. Envision Connection Project Board of Directors - August 28, 2014 5. Basset Creek Watershed Management Commission Workshop - October 8, 2014 3E. Adopt Resolution 14-97 Amending the 2014 General Fund Budget. 3F1. Approve purchase of the Galaxy radio transmitter modules from Metering and Technology Solutions for a cost of$123,520. 3F2. AuthoFize two yeaF GontraGt with Tim's TFee SeWiGe iR the a-mount of $127,880 3F3. Award Contract for the Briarwood Nature Area Water Quality Improvement Project to the lowest responsible bidder, New Look Contracting, Inc., in the amount of $187,440.75. 3F4. Authorize purchase of 36 - 800 MHZ Portable Radios through Motorola Solutions, Inc. for $151,431.75 for the Fire Department. 3F5. Authorize purchase of 40 - 800 MHZ Portable Radios through Motorola Solutions, Inc. for $139,730.00 for the Police Department. 3G1. Accept for filing Letter from Carol Kaehr regarding her resignation from Human Services Fund. 3G2. Accept for filing Emails regarding the METRO Blue Line Extension. 3H. Authorize the Mayor and City Manager to sign amended Hennepin County Violent Offender Task Force 2014 Cooperative Agreement. 31. Adopt Resolution 14-98 Establishing 2015 General Wages and Salaries for Non-Union Personnel. 3J. Adopt Resolution 14-99 Approving the 2015-2019 Capital Improvement Program. 3K. Adopt Resolution 14-100 for Approval of Plat Hanson Weed ShE)Fes. 3L. Authorize Agreement with Hennepin County for Sentencing to Serve Program in the amount not to exceed $90,064. 3M. Authorize City Manager to sign the amendment to Contract 04-01 between the City and North American Cleaning Service. 3N1. AutheFize the GoopeFative AgFeernent foF WateF Quality Improvements OR Twin Lake with 3N2. Authorize Professional Services Agreement with Barr Engineering Company for design, outreach, permitting, and implementation of Phase 1 of the Twin Lake Alum Treatment in the amount not to exceed $34,000. 30. Receive and file November 2014 Financial Reports. 3P. Adopt Resolution 14-101 Appointing Stacy Hoschka as Commissioner and Jane McDonald Black as Alternate Commissioner to the Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission, and Jeff Oliver as Member and Eric Eckman as Alternate Member to its Technical Advisory Committee. 3Q. Authorize Contract Amendment request with Patchin Messner Dodd and Brumm for real estate appraisal services for the Douglas Drive reconstruction project in the amount not to exceed $23,000. 3R. Authorize the ", I I —�y Manager to sign the Towing GGRtFaGt with North Subw Towing foF vehiGle Impound. 3S. Adopt Resolution 14-102 Accepting Donations for Ongoing Programs. 3T. Authorize City Manager to sign Engagement Letters with the firm of Malloy, Montague, Karnowski, Radosevich and Company for the 2014 Audit of the City. 3U. Adopt Resolution 14-103 Waiving the Public Hearing and Ordering Certification of Special Assessments on Private Sanitary Sewer Repairs in 2014. 3V. Adopt Resolution 14-104 Waiving the Public Hearing and Ordering Certification of Special Assessments on Driveways that Involve City Street Improvements. Unofficial City Council Minutes -3- December 16, 2014 3. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA - continued 3W. Adopt Resolution 14 105 AutheFizing ExeGUt'GR of ArneRdrneent to SubFeGipien Agreement with UFban HeRnepin County and aRy Third PaFty AgFeemeRts with jewi Housing and Programming (i HAP�-. 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA 3C1. Approve General Business Licenses as recommended by staff. City Manager Burt answered questions from Council. MOTION made by Council Member Fonnest, seconded by Council Member Snope to approve General Business Licenses as recommended by staff and the motion carried unanimously. 3C4. Approve Fireworks Permit for Sweeney Lake Homeowner's Association. Mr. Christopher Giese, 1485 Island Drive, requested Council remove this item from the Consent Agenda, he asked Council not to approve the fireworks permit and provided information regarding past displays. City Manager Burt and City Attorney Barnard answered questions from Council. There was Council discussion regarding the fireworks permit for the Sweeney Lake Homeowner's Association. Council Member Snope stated he would be abstaining from the vote due to the fact, the permit could be approved administratively. MOTION made by Council Member Schmidgall, seconded by Council Member Clausen to approve the fireworks display permit for PC Pyrotechnics Fireworks Company and Sweeney Lake Homeowner's Association upon a vote being take the following voted in favor: none, the following voted against: Clausen, Schmidgall, Harris, and Fonnest and the following abstained: Snope and the motion failed. 3F2. Authorize Contract for Trimming and Removal of Trees on Public Property. City Attorney Barnard and City Manager Burt answered questions from Council. There was Council discussion regarding the contract for tree trimming and removal of trees on public property. MOTION made by Council Member Schmidgall, seconded by Council Member Snope to authorize a two-year contract with Tim's Tree Service in the amount of $127,880 for trimming and removal of trees on public property upon a vote being taken the following voted in favor: Schmidgall, Harris, Fonnest and Snope and the following voted against: Clausen and the motion carried. 3K. Adopt Resolution 14-100 for Approval of Plat - Hanson Wood Shores. City Attorney Barnard answered questions from Council. MOTION made by Council Member Clausen, seconded by Council Member Schmidgall to adopt Resolution 14-100 for Approval of Plat for Hanson Wood Shores upon a vote being taken the following voted in favor: Schmidgall, Harris, Fonnest, Clausen and Snope and the following voted against: none and the motion carried. Unofficial City Council Minutes -4- December 16, 2014 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA - continued 3N1. Authorize the Cooperative Agreement for Water Quality Improvements in Twin Lake with the Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission. City Engineer Oliver answered questions from Council. MOTION made by Council Member Fonnest, seconded by Council Member Schmidgall to authorize the Cooperative Agreement for Water Quality Improvements in Twin Lake with the Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission and the motion carried unanimously. 3R. Authorize the Mayor and City Manager to sign the Towing Contract with North Suburban Towing for Vehicle Impound. City Manager Burt answered questions from Council. MOTION made by Council Member Snope, seconded by Council Member Fonnest to Authorize the Mayor and City Manager to sign the Towing Contract with North Suburban Towing for Vehicle Impound and the motion carried unanimously. 3W. Adopt Resolution 14-105 Authorizing Execution of Amendment to Subrecipient Agreement with Urban Hennepin County and any Third Party Agreements with Jewish Housing and Programming (J-HAP). Mayor Harris recused himself from the vote due to the fact he is on the Advisory Board for the Jewish Housing and Programming and excused himself from the Council Chambers, Mayor Pro- tem Clausen presided over the item. MOTION made by Council Member Snope, seconded by Council Member Fonnest to adopt Resolution 14-105 Authorizing Execution of Amendment to Subrecipient Agreement with Urban Hennepin County and any Third Party Agreements with Jewish Housing and Programming (J- HAP) upon a vote being taken the following voted in favor: Clausen, Snope, Schmidgall, and Fonnest, the following voted against: none and the following abstained: Harris, and the motion carried. 4. PUBLIC HEARING 4A. Public Hearing - Preliminary Plat Approval - Brunswick Estates - 108 Brunswick Avenue North Planning Manager Zimmerman presented the staff report and answered questions from Council. City Manager Burt and City Attorney Barnard answered questions from Council. Mayor Harris opened the public hearing. Ms. Diane Richard, 217 Paisley Lane, said she felt the residents of her neighborhood did not get due process because they were not notified of the neighborhood meeting. She said she appreciated that the item was presented at a second Planning Commission Meeting but because there was not a presentation given at the meeting, the residents were disappointed. Ms. Kathy Watson, 112 Paisley Lane, said the neighborhood was disappointed because they do not receive notice of the neighborhood meeting. She said the neighborhood would appreciate further communication from the developer as the project moves forward. Mayor Harris closed the public hearing. Unofficial City Council Minutes -5- December 16, 2014 4A. Public Hearing - Preliminary Plat Approval - Brunswick Estates - continued Mr. Peter Jarvis, Wooddale Builders, stated his company would commit to holding a neighborhood meeting at the time a house is proposed for a specific site on the site. He stated his company is aware of the City Code rules for development and would adhere to them. There was Council discussion regarding the Preliminary Plat Approval for Brunswick Estates at 108 Brunswick Avenue North. MOTION made by Council Member Fonnest, seconded by Council Member Snope to approve the Preliminary Plat for Brunswick Estates, 108 Brunswick Avenue North, subject to the following conditions and the motion carried unanimously. 1. The City Attorney will determine if a title review is necessary prior to approval of the Final Plat. 2. A park dedication fee of$3,080 shall be paid prior to Final Plat approval. 3. The City Engineer's memorandum, dated October 7, 2014, shall become part of this approval. 4. All applicable City permits shall be obtained prior to the development of the new lots. 4B. Public Hearing - Preliminary Plat Approval - Paisley Fields - 250 Paisley Lane Planning Manager Zimmerman presented the staff report and answered questions from Council. City Engineer Oliver and City Manager Burt answered questions from Council. Mr. Andrew Dornbusch, Applicant, 250 Paisley Lane, reviewed the proposal and presented details of the condition of the home currently on the site. He explained that it has a huge indoor pool dating back to the 1960s which has structural cracks that continue into the home. He said of his proposal the lots sizes would be double of what is required and that the imperious area will decrease while the green space will increase. He explained the tree preservation plan for the site and stated that a neighborhood meeting had been held. Mr. Matt Pavek, Civil Site Group, answered questions from Council. Mayor Harris opened the public hearing. Ms. Diane Richard, 217 Paisley Lane, said the neighbors did participate at the neighborhood and Planning Commission meetings. She asked how many construction projects can be completed at one time in one neighborhood. She stated her neighborhood is small with approximately 36 existing homes and if this proposal is approved, 10 homes would be being built simultaneously in her area. She said she is concerned with parking and construction management issues. She proposed a speed bump be added to the neighborhood because of children biking and the increased traffic. She said she would prefer to see only two homes being built on the lot but she realizes it could be more. Mayor Harris closed the public hearing. There was Council discussion regarding the Preliminary Plat Approval of Paisley Fields at 250 Paisley Lane. MOTION made by Council Member Schmidgall, seconded by Council Member Snope to approve the Preliminary Plat for Paisley Fields, 250 Paisley Lane, subject to the following conditions and the motion carried unanimously: Unofficial City Council Minutes -6- December 16, 2014 4B. Public Hearing - Preliminary Plat Approval - Paisley Fields - continued 1. The City Attorney will determine if a title review is necessary prior to approval of the Final Plat. 2. A park dedication fee of$2,146.67 shall be paid before Final Plat approval. 3. The City Engineer's memorandum, dated November 19, 2014, shall become part of this approval. 4. All applicable City permits shall be obtained prior to the development of the new lots. 4C. Public Hearing - Preliminary PUD Plan Central Park West - 1400 and 1500 State Highway 100 South, 5075 Wayzata Boulevard, 1511 Utica Avenue South - DLC Residential, LLC, Applicant Associate Planner Goellner and Planning Manager Zimmerman presented the staff report and answered questions from Council. Mr. David Graham, ESG Architects, explained the overall vision for the proposed project and said it includes a vibrant, mixed used, sustainable neighborhood. He said the proposal offered a lowered density of office space and parking ramps than that of the previous Duke project. He explained the proposal includes a re-build of Utica. He showed several renderings and added that the vision included a tree lined residential boulevard that wraps around the parking to make it more of a pedestrian and bike friendly, mixed use environment which also includes a large park in the center. He stated his company developed the Excelsior and Grand project in St. Louis Park. He explained the proposed time frame and said his company hired a sound consultant to aide in the sound barriers for residents in the area. Mr. Richard Kauffman, DLC Residential, stated the proposed project would be built in different phases with phase one starting in 2015. He said this project will be the main focus of his company over the next couple of years. Mayor Harris opened the public hearing. Mr. Gary Cohen, 4530 Douglas Avenue, stated the new development proposal is much better than the past one. He stated he felt the developer should conform to the recommended conditions which included a traffic study for the area and a neighborhood meeting after the study was completed. He said this project could be a win/win situation for all. He said he is concerned about voting issues since the proposed residential area will be located in both Golden Valley and St. Louis Park. He said the City needs to look at broader ways to communicate to the neighboring residents but he would like to see the PUD approved. Mr. Doug Diedrich, 4315 Tyrol Crest, said he is fine with where the parking ramp is being proposed, but is concerned about the traffic flow in the area because it is already congested. Mr. Robert Lazear, 1519 Natchez Avenue, submitted a copy of a letter in which he had submitted to the Council in 2008 regarding the Duke proposal. He explained the history of the past project which included two enormous office buildings and parking ramps with the main project approval coming from St. Louis Park. He said when the Golden Valley residents came forward regarding the proposal the Council at the time looked closer at the issues. He said the neighborhood has been supportive of the restaurants and retailers in the West End area, but is concerned how the residents will access the area. He added South Tyrol is a land locked neighborhood and he is concerned how more traffic will affect it. He stated St. Louis Park would be receiving most of the new development while Golden Valley would be acquiring Unofficial City Council Minutes -7- December 16, 2014 4C. Public Hearing - Preliminary PUD Plan Central Park West - continued mainly a parking ramp. He said his main concern is the traffic in the area. He would like to see a traffic light installed under Highway 100 for safety issues, and that the proposed parking ramp not have exits onto Wayzata Blvd. Ms. Daon Karpan 1400 Natchez Ave, said she would like to be assured that a traffic study would be completed for the area. Mr. Peter Zakrajsheck, 1425 Natchez Ave S, said he is concerned about traffic on Natchez Avenue because of safety issues. He said some type of signage should be added to the area. Mr. Lloyd Armstrong, 1415 Natchez Ave, said he parked on the left hand side of the street and that a car drove on a neighbor's yard to get around him. Ms. Donna Huber, 1420 Alpine Pass, said she is concerned about traffic getting out of South Tyrol and felt a traffic light may help to control traffic flow. Mr. Douglas Kline, 1509 Alpine Pass, said he welcomes the proposed development but is concerned about the parking ramp. He said he would like the green screen to be added to all of the eastern edges of the ramp. He said he would also like to see electric car and bike parking in the ramp. Mayor Harris closed the public hearing. There was much Council discussion regarding the Preliminary PUD Plan for Central Park West in the southwest Quadrant of 1-394 and Highway 100. MOTION made by Council Member Schmidgall, seconded by Council Member Clausen to approve the Preliminary Plan for Central Park West PUD No. 121, subject to the following conditions and the motion carried unanimously: 1. The plans prepared by DLC Residential, LLC, submitted with the application on October 20, 2014, shall become a part of this approval. 2. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Engineering Division to Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager, dated November 17, 2014, shall become a part of this approval. 3. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Fire Department to Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager, dated November 17, 2014, shall become a part of this approval. 4. All signage must meet the requirements of the City's Sign Code (Section 4.20). 5. A park dedication fee of $70,568 (2% of the estimated land value) shall be paid prior to approval of the Final Plat. 6. The Final Plat shall include "P.U.D. No. 121" in its title. 7. This approval is subject to all other state, federal, and local ordinances, regulations, or laws with authority over this development. 8. The Final PUD plan submittal shall include continuous pedestrian connections between the hotel and parking ramp as well as around the north and east sides of the residential phase 1 building. 9. The developer shall submit a plan before the City council meeting that shows the private driveway access point shifted north on Wayzata Boulevard, as discussed in the memo from the Engineering Division to Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager, dated November 17, 2014. Unofficial City Council Minutes -8- December 16, 2014 4C. Public Hearing - Preliminary PUD Plan Central Park West - continued 10. The Developer shall address concerns and comments from the Fire Department regarding fire hydrant locations, fire truck access on Lilac Drive, and fire suppression water sources and reflect changes in the final PUD submittal. 11. The City of St. Louis Park approves that portion of the Preliminary PUD within its jurisdiction 12. Prior to City Council preliminary review, the Developer shall present strategies to meet parking requirements for the Lot 3 hotel use, which could include additional underground hotel parking and/or a shared parking agreement with the nearby parking ramp. 13. The Final PUD plan submittal shall include bicycle parking counts and locations. 14. The property owners of any parcel in the Central Park West PUD shall follow the travel demand management plans approved for the West End Redevelopment, which will serve to reduce traffic congestion. The owner shall be required to update the plan or submit a new plan to the Golden Valley and St. Louis Park 1-394 Joint Task Force prior to Final PUD approval. The Plan shall also include bicycle and pedestrian traffic data. 15. The Developer shall enter into an agreement with the City of Golden Valley for public use of the park outlot. 16. The Final PUD plan submitted shall include a detailed Lighting Plan in accordance with the City's Outdoor Lighting requirements (Section 11.73). 17. The Applicant shall submit a snow storage plan. 18. A neighborhood meeting with the developer shall be held after an updated traffic study has been completed, but before Final PUD Plan review. The notification area for this meeting shall be expanded to include the entire South Tyrol/Kennedy area. 19. A final design plan shall be reviewed by the City prior to Final Plan approval. In addition the Council makes the following findings pursuant to City Code Section 11.55, Subd. 5(E): 1. Quality Site Planning. The PUD plan is tailored to the specific characteristics of the site, such as the proximity to highway traffic and a high retaining wall to the north and east and high-density development to the south and west. With flexibility under a PUD in uses allowed, setbacks, height, parking requirements, number of buildings on a lot, and similar requirements, the quality of site planning and design is of higher quality than if each parcel was designed individually under conventional provisions. By allowing a mix of land uses, the site plan offers the opportunity to live, work, visit, and enjoy outdoor gathering space. The PUD encourages creativity and flexibility in land development. 2. Preservation. The PUD plan preserves and protects substantial desirable portions of the site's characteristics, open space and sensitive environmental features including steep slopes, trees, scenic views, creeks, wetlands, and open waters. The site is currently used for surface parking and is mostly impervious. Even though 36 existing trees will be removed, the proposed plan adds about 37,897 square feet of public gathering space, roughly 245 trees, and 19,742 square feet of shrubs and perennial beds to the site. 3. Efficient & Effective. The PUD plan includes efficient and effective use of the land. The PUD plan provides an appropriate area of the city for high-density office, residential, and hotel uses. The PUD plan encourages development that is sustainable and has a high degree of energy efficiency. 4. Compatibility. The PUD Plan results in development compatible with adjacent uses and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and redevelopment plans and goals. High-density office, commercial, and residential uses surround the site to the south and west. Low-density residential uses are separated from this proposed PUD site by significant highway development. The PUD plan increases housing options, jobs, lodging options, and gathering space to the area. Unofficial City Council Minutes -9- December 16, 2014 4C. Public Hearing - Preliminary PUD Plan Central Park West - continued 5. General Health. The PUD plan is consistent with preserving and improving the general health, safety and general welfare of the people of the City. By encouraging the use of contemporary land planning principles, the PUD plan offers the ability to live, work, shop, and spend time outdoors without reliability on the automobile. The PUD plan promotes pedestrian activity and provides high-quality landscaping additions to the site. 6. Meets Requirements. The PUD plan meets the PUD Intent and Purpose provision and all other PUD ordinance provisions. The PUD provision permits flexibility from other provisions in Chapter 11 of the City Code. This flexibility is permitted in order to promote the intent and purpose of the PUD section of the City Code. 6. NEW BUSINESS 6A. METRO Blue Line Extension Update Planning Manager Zimmerman presented the staff report and answered questions from Council. MOTION made by Council Member Clausen, seconded by Council Member Snope to receive and file METRO Blue Extension Update and the motion carried unanimously. 6B. Announcement of Meetings A Bottineau Planning Advisory Committee meeting will be held on December 17, 2014, at 6 pm at the University Research Outreach and Engagement Center. Some Council Members may attend the Employee Recognition on December 18, 2014, at 2 pm in the Council Chambers. The City offices are closed on Wednesday, December 24 and Thursday, December 25, 2014, in observance of Christmas. Some Council Members may attend the Family Snowshoe Event on December 30, 2014, at Brookview Golf Course from 1 to 3 pm. Some Council Members may attend the New Year's Eve Family Event on December 31, 2014, at Scheid Park from 7 to 10 pm. The City offices are closed on Thursday, January 1, 2015, in observance of New Year's Day. Some Council Members may attend the Brookview Tour De Fat on January 3, 2015, at Brookview Golf Course at 10 am. The next Council meeting will be held on January 6, 2015, at 6:30 pm. PRISM is hosting an Ugly Christmas Sweater Fundraiser on December 20, 2014, at 7 pm. Some Council Members may attend a METRO Blue Line Extension Committee Meeting on December 17, 2014, at 12:30 pm. Unofficial City Council Minutes -10- December 16, 2014 6C. Mayor and Council Communication City Manager Burt updated Council on upcoming proposed meetings. Mayor Harris stated he received a nice call from a resident for the service received by Public Works. Council wished the residents of Golden Valley Happy Holidays. 7. Adjournment MOTION made by Council Member Fonnest, seconded by Council Member Schmidgall, and the motion carried unanimously to adjourn the meeting at 10:45 pm. Shepard Harris, Mayor ATTEST: Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk City �gyolde�fn" ryV%' MEMORANDUM valley Administrative Services Department 763-593-8013/763-593-3969(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting January 6, 2015 Agenda Item 3. B. Set Time and Place of Agenda Closing Prepared By Kris Luedke, City Clerk Summary At the first meeting of every year, the Council sets the time and place for receipt of any public information for the City Council agenda packet. Recommended Action Motion to set the closing time and place for receipt of public information for inclusion in the Council agenda packet as 4:30 pm on the Wednesday preceding the Council meeting in the City Manager's Office. C i Y MEMORANDUMgoiden 4f%� V 'r 'valley Administrative Services Department 763-593-8013/763-593-3969(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting January 6, 2015 Agenda Item 3. C. Designation of 2015 Official Newspaper Prepared By Kris Luedke, City Clerk Summary In accordance with Minnesota Statutes, the Council must designate a newspaper of general circulation in the City as the official newspaper in which all ordinances, hearing notices, advertisement for bids, etc. are required to be published. Recommended Action Motion to designate the New Hope/Golden Valley SunPost as the 2015 official newspaper. of C l 1 golden MEMORANDUM valley Administrative Services Department 763-593-8013/763-593-3969(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting January 6, 2015 Agenda Item 3. D. Designation of Depository for City Funds Prepared By Sue Virnig, Finance Director Summary State Law requires cities to have depositories for city funds approved annually. The attached resolution states the depository, accounts, and signature requirements for each account. Attachments • Resolution Designating Depository for City Funds (2 pages) Recommended Action Motion to adopt Resolution Designating Depository for City Funds. Resolution 15-01 January 6, 2015 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION DESIGNATING DEPOSITORY FOR CITY FUNDS WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes set procedures and require the City Council to designate depositories for City funds; and WHEREAS, these statutes allow the City Council to authorize the Accounting Coordinator or Finance Director/Treasurer to annually designate a bank as the official depository for the City funds and manage the collateral pledged to such funds; and WHEREAS, Wells Fargo Bank, Minnesota, N.A., is now the official depository; and WHEREAS, Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, N.A., wires transfer funds to below institutions for investments purchased by the City: BNC National Bank Central Bank Piper Jaffray Companies RBC-Dain Rauscher Sterne Agee & Leach US Bank Venture Bank Wells Fargo 4M Fund BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the following signatories or alternates are authorized to be signatories on checks drawn on funds deposited: 1. General Checking: Mayor or Mayor Pro Tem and Treasurer or Accounting Coordinator; Each check requires two (2) signatures. 2. Internal Deposit Funds: (Motor Vehicle Registration Fund Checking, DNR Transaction account) Transfers may be made by the City Treasurer and Accounting Coordinator to the State of Minnesota, DNR and City of Golden Valley General Checking; Deputy Registrar may make transfers between accounts (Motor Vehicle Registration Fund and DNR Account) and to the State of Minnesota for deposits. 3. Imprest Fund Checking: (Park and Recreation, City Activity Account, Brookview Golf Course and Brookview Golf Activity): Signatories shall be as designated by the City Manager who shall notify the bank at the time of authorization or change or authorization and each check shall require one (1) signature. Resolution 15-01- Continued January 6, 2015 4. ACH Transfers: (City of Golden Valley General Account): Will be authorized for the Accountant, Accounting Coordinator or Finance Director/Treasurer for payroll transfers created by the Payroll System. Will be authorized for the Utility Billing/Accounts Payable Technician, Accounting Coordinator or Finance Director/Treasurer for such accounts set up on ACH account payment types created by the Utility Billing System. Will be authorized for the Accounting Coordinator and Finance Director/Treasurer will be authorized to make transfers to the Investment firms or electronic payments authorized. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the following shall be authorized to make investments of city funds and shall be authorized to deposit the principal of said investments in the above named depositories as necessary and beneficial to the City: City Manager, Finance Director/Treasurer and Accounting Coordinator. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to furnish each of the depositories with certified copies of this resolution along with such signature documentation as is required by the depository and the authorizations set forth in all above. Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by the City Clerk. city o w (yoldcn MEMORANDUM alley Finance Department 763-593-8013/763-593-8109(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting January 6, 2015 Agenda Item 3, E. 1. Approval of City Check Register Prepared By Sue Virnig, Finance Director Summary Approval of the check register for various vendor claims against the City of Golden Valley. Attachments Document sent via email Recommended Action Motion to authorize the payment of the bills as submitted. a l _ go 'V1 ,kAr MEMORANDUM valley Finance Department 763-593-8013/763-593-8109(fax) 5 n4 Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting January 6, 2015 Agenda Item 3. E. 2. Approval of Housing and Redevelopment Authority Check Register Prepared By Sue Virnig, Finance Director Summary Approval of the check register for various vendor claims against the Housing and Redevelopment Authority. Attachments • Document sent via email Recommended Action Motion to authorize the payment of the bills as submitted. city 0 g01denVvVv *'NMEMORANDUM valley City Administration/Council J 763-593-3991 /763-593-8109(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting January 6, 2015 Agenda Item 3. F. 1. Solicitor's License- Wisdom Executives, Inc. Prepared By Judy Nally, Administrative Assistant Summary As per City Code, any individual or group intending to go door-to-door within the City selling products, taking orders or soliciting for business or donations must be licensed by the City to do so. Attachments • Peddler/Solicitor License Application (2 pages) Recommended Action Motion to approve the solicitor's license for Wisdom Executives, Inc. Application and fee must be submitted to the City Manager's Office the Wednesday prior to the City Council Meeting. Council Meetings are normally held the first and third Tuesday of each month. PEDDLER/SOLICITOR LICENSE APPLICATION TO: Golden Valley City Council Fee Paid: $ o 7800 Golden Valley Road Number of Persons: Golden Valley, MN 55427 Type of License: Peddler Solicitor x(10 (circle Enclose the sum of$2J fore (number) peddlers/solicitors as required by City Code of the City of Golden Valley and have complied with all the requirements of said Code necessary for obtaining this license. WIScIOM GXeCgt Y^eS Inc. (Business or Individual Name or Organization to be Licensed) MN Business ID Federal Business ID (FEIN) Define Business l,./`'° OrppywJld n (Corporation, Proprietorship, Partnership, Non-Profit, State of Incorporation or Individual) 's120 pwo Ave S&J--1 Sok ko (Address) BLvmi lir4, Mitt 55Y31 City, State and Zip Code) q5;z• 3n- /562 (Telephone Number, including Area Code) NOW, THEREFORE,? 6 Jr510M hereby makes application for (Applicant Name) period of 7 /S through 12/31dS, subject to the conditions and provisions of said City C ignature of pHida61TRIncipal Officer) Description of goods or services for sale (include prices) or indicate if soliciting donations. If more space is needed, attach additional sheets (be specific): Cc Alts:14YtK awl t rd/l/ NOTE: If the products for sale are changed or modified, you must give the City complete information regarding such change or modification. List the names and addresses of EACH person who will be peddling or soliciting on behalf of said organization in the City, or, in the alternative, the name, address and telephone number or numbers where a responsible person of said organization will maintain a list of names and addresses of all persons engaged in peddling or soliciting in the City: 20t"ur, wrs�l A&MM Ave S, l3,(oo-yy►r rIvA , QA1 55113 / 795-317- 7-13 `/ ,�;c4 wird Mui u�u�h u,G i i` iv►�.l�0li a.8��7tctS'Scru� �hrzri � �u'�CicGS lr�l� (If more space is needed, attach additional sheets) STATE OF MpTV &T�-) ) ss. COUNTY OF of AJ/Sdoyh b' t.A Ifa. (Officer/individual) (Name of Organization) being first duly sworn, depose and say that all the foregoing information is true to his/her own knowledge except as to matters therein stated on information and belief, and as to such matters, he/she believes them to be true. Signature of Applicant/Principal Officer) Subscribed and sworn to before me this 3 6-day of�eC �JP✓' , 20 1 (Signature) M � � m Cir,nisicsrj :�:iar...31.2015 city- of eoldenvvkvirMEMORANDUM alley City Administration/Council 763-593-3991 /763-593-8109(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting January 6, 2015 Agenda Item 3. F. 2. Solicitor's License - Working America AFL-CIO Prepared By Judy Nally,Administrative Assistant Summary As per City Code, any individual or group intending to go door-to-door within the City selling products,taking orders or soliciting for business or donations must be licensed by the City to do SO. Attachments • Peddler/Solicitor License Application (2 pages) Recommended Action Motion to approve the solicitor's license for Working America AFL-CIO. Application and fee must be submitted to the City Manager's Office the Wednesday prior to the City Council Meeting. Council Meetings are normally held the first and third Tuesday of each month. PEDDLER/SOLICITOR LICENSE APPLICATION Q© TO: Golden Valley City Council Fee Paid: $ _ 7800 Golden Valley Road Number of Persons: r Golden Valley, MN 55427 Type of License: Peddler Solicitor (circle one) J Enclose the sum of$ J� for (number) peddlers/solicitors as required by City Code of the City of Golden Valley and have complied with all the requirements of said Code necessary for obtaining this license. lc,y2,c 4 (Business or Individual Name or Organization to be Licensed) 20-- d2-( 336i' 1 (MN Business ID or FEIN (Federal ID) for Business Licenses) Define Business (Corporation, Proprietorship, Partnership, Non-Profit, State of Incorporation or Individual) c/ 7 L a e, s-,4. (Address) I ity, State and Zip Code) l ` l /)_ ` 3j.3/ - 'e-po 0 (Telephone Number, including Area Code) NOW, THEREFORE, L Aliv r r4 //4,4�(O`hlelrby makes application for (Applicant ame) period of through-121-3-1-f-- 57 sub' t-to the conditions and provisions of said City Code. ( ignature of Applicant/P&eipai Officer) Description of goods or services for sale (include prices) or indicate if soliciting donations. If more space is needed, attach additional sheets (be specific): NOTE: If the products for sale are changed or modified, you must give the City complete information regarding such change or modification. List the names and addresses of EACH person who will be peddling or soliciting on behalf of said organization in the City, or, in the alternative, the name, address and telephone number or numbers where a responsible person of said organization will maintain a list of names and addresses of all persons engaged in peddling or soliciting in the City: on yo % A& I'S-?DO Mi. ef lorwa.y g1l mu jvrfwtP . a (If more space is needed, attach additional sheets) STATE OF `\)�(O Pf-) ) ss. COUNTY OF t��f111N ) / 4114r�t A17 1, 471' of (Officer/Individual) (Na(na of Organization) being first duly sworn, depose and say that all the foregoing information is true to his/her own knowledge except as to matters therein stated on information andel' f, and as to such matters, he/she believes them to be true. r' Signature of App kant/P ' cipal Officer) Subscribed and sworn to before me this Z� day of20 I (Signature) Y my c.:x?asiia.::yPfR°J? .;3l.2i!95 .7isd'a � Regular Meeting of the Golden Valley Planning Commission November 24, 2014 A regular meeting of the Planning Commission was held at the Golden Valley City Hall, Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota, on Monday, November 24, 2014, Chair Kluchka called the meeting to order at 7 pm. Those present were Planning Commissioners Baker, Blum, Cera, Johnson, Kluchka, Segelbaum, and Waldhauser. Also present was Planning Manager Jason Zimmerman, Associate Planner/Grant Writer Emily Goellner, and Administrative Assistant Lisa Wittman. 1. Approval of Minutes November 10, 2014, Regular Planning Commission Meeting Waldhauser referred to the sixth paragraph on page four and asked that the sentence be corrected to say there are a group of property owners who don't want see the property developed. Waldhauser referred to the third paragraph on page nine and suggested the word "prohibit" be changed to "discourage." MOVED by Baker, seconded by Cera and motion carried unanimously to approve the November 10, 2014, minutes with the above noted changes. 2. Presentation of Capital Improvement Program 2015-2019 — Sue Virnig, City Finance Director Sue Virnig, Finance Director, explained that the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is a 5-year financing planning instrument used to identify needed capital projects and to delineate the financing and timing of associated projects. Because of its relationship with the City's Comprehensive Plan the CIP is reviewed by the Planning Commission annually. Waldhauser referred to the Winnetka Avenue/Highway 55 intersection and Douglas Drive improvements and asked if the CIP anticipates and supports higher density uses, or if the proposed projects would just alleviate the current traffic issues. Virnig explained that the individual projects in the CIP will be reviewed again by the City Council. Baker asked if there is anything in the CIP that raises questions regarding its compatibility with the Comprehensive Plan. Virnig noted that the community center is not listed in the CIP yet. Kluchka questioned how the community center would be accounted for. Virnig said it would be in the building fund, or it would be on its own funding. Segelbaum asked if the Golden Hills TIF district is concluding at the end of this year. Virnig said the TIF district will be decertified this year and that there is a bond payment in February. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission November 24, 2014 Page 2 Waldhauser referred to the Three Rivers trail system plans and asked how close the items listed in the CIP gets the City to completion of the trail system. Virnig explained that the funding listed in the CIP is for existing trails and that the City would need to review further plans for any new trails. MOVED by Waldhauser, seconded by Segelbaum and motion carried unanimously to recommend approval of the 2015-2019 Capital Improvement Program as it is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. Consideration of Resolution No. 14-01 Finding that Modification No. 2 of the Redevelopment Plan for the Highway 55 West Redevelopment Project Area and the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing (Renewal and Renovation) District No. 1 Conform to the General Plan for the Development and Redevelopment of the City, as Amended (Amended 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update) Zimmerman reminded the Commission that in 2012 a TIF plan was approved for the Highway 55 Redevelopment area. At that time it was anticipated that the Tiburon apartment project would move forward, but it has not. There is now a new project proposed for that site so the TIF plan needs to be modified to revise the budget and amend the timeline to make it current with the new Golden Villas proposal. Kluchka asked if anything else in the TIF plan has changed. Zimmerman said the area of the district has not changed, but the budget needs have changed. Kluchka asked if the time period of the TIF district has changed. Zimmerman said no, it is still 15 years. Waldhauser asked if there would be another modification required if the Golden Villas proposal doesn't move forward. She asked if the budget is entirely dependent on what a developer asks for. Zimmerman said not entirely, there may be some negotiation involved. Blum asked if it is correct say that the City is taking on a debt that's underwritten by future tax revenues based on projected values, and using that revenue to improve the land to make it a financially doable project and if part of the incentive to the City is that right now it is not a very well used property. Zimmerman said yes, ultimately the TIF assistance allows a project to take place, that otherwise couldn't. Blum asked if the money comes from the State and County. Virnig said the TIF money comes from the jurisdiction it actually involves. In this case, Hennepin County, School District 270 and City taxes. Baker asked why the Tiburon apartment project failed. Zimmerman said it involved financing. He explained that the Tiburon developer was not asking for TIF money, the City was asking for it in order to do necessary improvements in the area. Baker asked if it is decided up front how TIF funds will be used. Zimmerman explained that the TIF plan is for the district and that there is a separate development plan for specific properties. Baker said there should be a benefit to the City and he wants to be clear on what the City is getting. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission November 24, 2014 Page 3 He said the City doesn't use TIF very often and he would like to see it used more often. Zimmerman said there are specific things the funds can be used for such as soil correction, street improvements, site clearing, and improved access. Waldhauser asked about the downside to the developer of using TIF. She questioned why a developer wouldn't automatically ask to use TIF. Virnig said each developer is different. She stated that the developer of the Golden Villas project has used TIF in the past in other cities, and that the City has to see a benefit in using TIF. She clarified that this TIF plan is the financing plan for seven parcels in the area. She added that any proposal has to pass the "but for" test which means that a development would not happen "but for" the use of TIF. Baker asked if there are affordable housing units included in the proposed development. Zimmerman explained that if this were a housing TIF they would have to have an affordable housing component to their plans, however this is a renewal district so they do not. Baker questioned if the Planning Commission should require there to be an affordable housing component. Zimmerman said it may have been an HRA decision to not have this be a housing district. Waldhauser said there are clearly benefits to the City in what will be covered by this TIF district including sidewalk connections and infrastructure improvements. Kluchka agreed and said he thinks this is the right place for TIF to be used. Johnson referred to the estimated project costs in the TIF plan and questioned why half of the costs are administration and interest. Virnig explained that the City would pay over a period of time and that the final terms haven't been negotiated yet. MOVED by Kluchka, seconded by Segelbaum and motion carried unanimously to adopt Resolution 14-01 finding that Modification No. 2 of the Redevelopment Plan for the Highway 55 West Redevelopment Project Area and the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing (Renewal and Renovation) District No. 1 Conform to the General Plan for the Development and Redevelopment of the City, as Amended (Amended 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update) 4. Informal Public Hearing — Minor Subdivision — 108 Brunswick Ave N — Brunswick Estates — SU12-17 Applicant: Wooddale Edina LLC Address: 108 Brunswick Avenue North Purpose: To reconfigure the existing single family residential lot into two new single family residential lots. Kluchka stated that the Planning Commission has already reviewed this proposal. However, due to an administrative issue, they have to review it again. Zimmerman explained that the software used to generate mailing labels for the hearing notices did Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission November 24, 2014 Page 4 not produce the correct information and many of the neighboring property owners were not informed of the first public hearing held for this item at the October 13 Planning Commission meeting. As a result, the developer is being required to go through Planning Commission and City Council consideration a second time. Zimmerman explained the applicant's request to subdivide the property at 108 Brunswick Avenue North into two new lots. The existing single family home would be demolished, and two new single family homes would be constructed. Zimmerman referred to a site plan of the property and explained that Lot 1 would be 19,100 square feet in size with 113.62 feet of width at the front setback line, and Lot 2 would be 19,510 square feet in size with 126.75 feet of width at the front setback line. He added that the minimum lot size requirement is 10,000 square feet and the minimum required width at the front setback line is 80 feet. He stated that staff is recommending approval of the proposed subdivision as it meets all of the requirements outlined in the City Code. Baker asked Zimmerman to clarify where the front setback line is located on this property and added that the street really only touches a portion of this property, the rest of the property touches other lots. Zimmerman agreed that the frontage on this property is unusual. However, the width of a lot is measured at the front setback line, which is 35 feet away from the front property line, not right at the front property line abutting the street right-of-way. Blum asked if this proposal has been modified at all from the previous proposal they reviewed. Zimmerman said no, it is the same application, the City Attorney advised the Planning Commission and City Council to consider the proposal again since the mailing labels for the first hearing notice were incorrect. Kluchka opened the public hearing. Diane Richard, 217 Paisley Lane, said no one in the neighborhood received hearing notices and they did not have a neighborhood meeting. She said she would appreciate the applicant showing her what he wants to build, and that more information would be appreciated. Jennifer Berg, 70 Brunswick Avenue North, said she hasn't received any mailings and questioned why she hasn't. She said the only reason she knew anything about this proposal is that she is friends with the property owner. Zimmerman explained that it wasn't until it was brought to his attention that he realized the mailing labels weren't generated properly. Once the issue was realized, the proposal was scheduled for the next available Planning Commission meeting and new public hearing notices were mailed to all property owners within 500 feet. Shauna Crowe, 55 Brunswick Avenue North, stated that the property across the street from her was already subdivided and two large homes were built. She said she has Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission November 24, 2014 Page 5 endured construction for the last four years and her soundtrack has been beeping, pounding, etc. that seems like it will never end. She said this neighborhood was a key factor in her choosing where to live because coming from south Minneapolis the homes were crowded. She said this area seemed like a haven but she is not as optimistic as she was. She said the Tralee neighborhood is being split up, there are no sidewalks, and there will be more traffic in the area. She said she is concerned about dust, debris, and noise, and added that she is not a morning person and people in the neighborhood are retired or work from home. She said the street was new when they first moved in and has since been torn up for utilities and more traffic will cause more wear and tear on the street. She said clay and mud get tracked all over, and traffic uses her driveway to turn around in, covering her driveway with mud and tire tracks and wearing it down. She said in the winter she doesn't get the full benefit of plowing and it is important that utility vehicles have access because there is not a lot of room on this cul-de-sac. She said her front yard was torn up twice without notice and she can't get grass to grow in the area so she grew a garden instead. She said she is also concerned about the environment and the disruption of neighborhood homes. Parking is overflowing when someone has an event and she is not sure how two more driveways will fit on the end of the cul-de-sac. She said her brick rambler house will no longer fit in with the neighborhood and she feels her curb appeal will be lackluster and out of place where it once fit it. She said she fears other neighbors will be moving on and their lots will also be developed. She said she is concerned about the renovations she's done to her home and feels like she is being taken over and has lost enthusiasm to update her home, because it will be seen as a tear down. She asked if developers have plans to develop in the future, how long it will take to build the proposed new homes, and if they will be built simultaneously. She said she was surprised to not get notice of the original public hearing for this items because she has received notices in the past. Donna Fredkove, 26 Paisley Lane, said she is concerned about drainage because some homes on Meander Road are having drainage problems they've never had before. She said it is important that she has all of the information and that this is an issue of due process, and she should have full due process. Kathy Watkins, 112 Paisley Lane, said she did not receive a hearing notice. She said she is also speaking for her neighbor Ruth Hetman at 124 Paisley Lane. She said she is concerned about the size of the new homes and if they will block the view. She said she is also concerned about destroying the land and the constant noise. She stated that people buying these houses will find that they are too big and will sell them again, so it is not a stable neighborhood. She said "millenials" these days are not properly employed, and not saving money so she questions who is going to buy these houses. She referred to plans she saw on the internet and stated that they referred to the homes proximity to Breck School, when these homes are located in the Hopkins school district which should be cited on the developer's web site as well. Tom Berscheid, 120 King Hill Road, questioned where the City is in the moratorium process. He said he understands the emotional aspects and the commerce aspects. He said he wants to preserve green space and the pastoral setting particularly in this area and losing this negates the livability of Golden Valley. He said he wants the City to keep Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission November 24, 2014 Page 6 this in mind when considering subdivisions. He said he also wants the City to think of their grandchildren and what attracts people to the City. Seeing and hearing no one else wishing to comment, Kluchka closed the public hearing. Kluchka reiterated that there was a notification issue and stated that staff will continue to work on the problem. Cera said he is concerned because one of the people who spoke said they did not get a hearing notice for this meeting either. Zimmerman stated that the mailing list for this meeting was double checked, but he would look into what happened. Waldhauser asked if a neighborhood meeting with the developer was held for this proposal. Zimmerman said yes, and added that the same, incorrect, mailing labels were used for that meeting as well. Kluchka asked about the approach the City takes regarding construction management controls. Zimmerman said that construction issues are handled on a complaint basis. He added that the City Council has asked staff to create a list of construction issues that developers would be required to sign stating that they are aware of the requirements. Kluchka asked if a parking plan would be included in that document. Zimmerman said a parking plan would be required at the building stage, not at the subdivision stage of a proposal. Kluchka stated that this is a tight area and there should be a plan in place. Waldhauser said she doesn't know where else construction parking could occur, because this is a cul-de-sac. Cera added that a developer might know the City's rules, but all the contractors and subcontractors won't necessarily know them. Segelbaum suggesting posting the document at the job site. Kluchka asked if the City has construction management staff. Zimmerman said no and added that any issues are handled on a complaint basis. Segelbaum asked if there are limits regarding the number of years construction can span, or the times of day construction can occur. Zimmerman stated that the City Code requires that "progress is being made" if there is an open building permit. Kluchka stated that the Planning Commission is really only considering the subdivision itself. He stated that they have a history of reviewing and researching "McMansions" regarding setbacks and other issues, and that Golden Valley has many more restrictions than other communities. Segelbaum added that they don't approve house plans or designs, just the envelope area where a house could be built. Baker said there has been a process violation and that the full presentation hasn't been presented at this meeting. Kluchka stated that the full presentation has been presented. Baker said he doesn't like the idea that the presentation was shortened and didn't include all of the details they normally see. Kluchka reiterated that they have seen all the details and he wants to be careful about saying there has been a process violation. Kluchka asked about the status of the subdivision moratorium. Zimmerman said no new subdivision applications were received after September 25 and that this proposal was Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission November 24, 2014 Page 7 submitted on September 16. He stated that the City has hired a consultant and there will be a community listening session on December 11. Segelbaum referred to the comments regarding sidewalks in this area and asked if neighbors can get together and ask for sidewalks to be built. Zimmerman said that neighbors can petition the City to have sidewalks installed. Segelbaum asked if there are other subdivisions proposed in this area. Zimmerman said there is a subdivision proposal pending for the property at 250 Paisley Lane. Segelbaum asked if it is possible that the neighbor's lawn could be torn up and not repaired as was mentioned in the public hearing. Zimmerman said he doesn't think that is the normal process. Segelbaum asked if the streets will be torn up. Zimmerman said there will be some work done in the cul-de-sac in order to add utilities for the second home. Johnson said he has heard concerns about drainage, noise, dust and access. He referred to the criteria regarding the approval of subdivisions and asked if there is an opportunity to review the requirements in the Single Family zoning district. Kluchka said that the rules that are currently in place are the only ones the Planning Commission is allowed to consider by statute. He added that the other issues discussed can be evaluated as part of the subdivision moratorium. Johnson asked about the neighbor's recourse. Kluchka said developers need to work with the City and the contractors to help them understand. Baker encouraged residents to speak at the subdivision moratorium listening session and added that concerns should also be addressed as part of the future Comprehensive Plan update process. Blum asked about the minimum lot size requirements. Zimmerman said the minimum lot size requirement is 10,000 square feet, and these proposed lots will be approximately 19,000 square feet in size. Segelbaum noted that there are eight criteria required to be met when subdividing property and one of the criteria is that if they are all met, the subdivision cannot be denied, so the Planning Commission should not deny this application. Cera said he is still concerned that the neighbor next door to this proposal hasn't received any of the City's notifications. Waldhauser also questioned how there could people who didn't know about this meeting. MOVED by Waldhauser, seconded by Cera to recommend approval of the Brunswick Estates Subdivision proposal subject to the following findings and conditions: Findings: 1. Both of the lots of the proposed subdivision meet the requirements of the R-1 Single Family Zoning District. 2. The City Engineer finds that the lots are buildable. 3. The addition of the new lots will not place an undue strain on City utility systems. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission November 24, 2014 Page 8 Conditions: 1. The City Attorney will determine if a title review is necessary prior to approval of the Final Plat. 2. A park dedication fee of$3,080 shall be paid prior to Final Plat approval. 3. The City Engineer's memorandum, dated October 7, 2014, shall become part of this approval. 4. All applicable City permits shall be obtained prior to the development of the new lots. Segelbaum asked if they figured out any parking limitations during construction. Kluchka said the parking was worth commenting on, but he doesn't know if it can be added as a condition of approval. He stated there was a motion on the table. The motion carried unanimously. 5. Informal Public Hearing — Minor Subdivision — 250 Paisley Lane — Paisley Fields — SU12-19 Applicant: Andrew Dornbusch Address: 250 Paisley Lane Purpose: To reconfigure the existing single family residential lot into three new single family residential lots. Zimmerman explained the applicant's proposal to subdivide the lot at 250 Paisley Lane into three new lots. He stated that the existing single family home would be demolished and three new single family homes would be constructed. He referred to a site plan and stated that this subdivision also requires a lot line adjustment with the neighboring property at 245 Paisley Lane in order to eliminate an existing driveway encroachment. He stated that the minimum lot size requirement in the R-1 Single Family zoning district is 10,000 square feet. Lot 1 (245 Paisley) will be 52,262 square feet, Lot 2 will be 19,510 square feet, Lot 3 will be 21,756 square feet, and Lot 4 will be 20,714 square feet. All of the proposed new lots will have 80 feet of width at the front setback line. He noted that there are a number of trees on the existing lot and six will be removed, four of which are significant trees. He stated that Staff is recommending approval of the subdivision proposal as it meets all of the requirements of the City Code. Kluchka said it is interesting that all of the proposed new lots are exactly 80 feet in width and questioned if modifying the property line for the neighboring driveway encroachment issue affected the ability to get 80 feet of width. Zimmerman stated that the property line adjustment allowed the lots to have 80 feet of width. Kluchka said he is concerned that a lot line has been established because of the location of the driveway on the neighboring property. Zimmerman explained a different plan the Applicant had considered which had the frontage of the proposed new lots on the south end of the property. However, that plan is not ideal as the south end of the property is adjacent to a park area. Drew Dornbusch, Applicant, reiterated that his original proposal had the frontage along the park area, but that the preference of the neighbors was to not put the front of a house Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission November 24, 2014 Page 9 along the park because they consider that park area a gathering place. He referred to a site plan of the property and stated that the existing home is 6,200 square feet with a 1,700 square foot foundation, on 1.45 acres of land. He showed photos of the existing house and stated that the proposed new homes will reflect a decrease in overall impervious surface and will increase the amount of green space. He stated that the average lot size of the new lots will be more than 20,000 square feet in size and that he will be saving 88% of the significant trees on the property. Johnson asked if the amount of impervious surface includes the existing driveway. Dornbusch said yes. Segelbaum asked about issues discussed at the neighborhood meeting. Dornbusch said that the issues discussed included traffic control, the installation of speed bumps or stop signs, and the design of the new homes. Segelbaum asked about the timing of the project. Dornbusch said he would like to start this year. Baker stated that the site plans suggest there is a wetland on the southeast corner of the property, but said it is not obvious to him when he looked at the property on an aerial photo. Zimmerman stated that the map isn't indicating a wetland, it is referring to a rain garden that was installed to help control run-off. Matt Pavek, Engineer for the project, stated that the rain garden is off site and was installed during the street reconstruction. Kluchka opened the public hearing. Diane Richard, 217 Paisley Lane, said the idea of a speed bump was brought forward at the neighborhood meeting in order to protect children riding their bikes. She stated that the placement of the driveway on Lot 3 is due to the location of an oak tree and she appreciates that, but she is concerned that the driveway might be too close to the bike path and might cause traffic confusion with the park. She said she appreciates the trees the applicant is keeping, but she is concerned about buckthorn and would appreciate if the developer could remove it as part of this plan. She said she wants to know more about the timing of the construction, and she would like to see all three homes constructed at once. She said there are 36 homes in the Tralee neighborhood and there are six LDK homes so she would like to know who the builder will be. She stated that the neighborhood park is a gathering spot and she wants assurance that the homes will complement the park and aesthetically blend in. She said she wants to hear about the developers obligations to carry forward with what he has agreed to. She said she is disappointed that the applicant isn't splitting the property into two lots instead of three, but she appreciates the applicant's sensitivity. Jennifer Berg, 70 Brunswick Avenue North, said she was concerned about building her home to look timeless and not building a "McMansion." She said the City is delusional about how water moves around this city and stated that these new homes will have irrigation systems that will have a huge impact on the water, sewer and street. She said the City is also delusional about tree preservation. She said she was required to raise Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission November 24, 2014 Page 10 her home a foot, an elm tree had to be removed, and she only had to replace two trees. She added that she would have replaced more trees but there are ugly power lines in her yard so she can't. She said she called the City and begged for a plow and a street sweeper and she spent $15,000 in permits that were worthless because she now has to spend thousands of dollars on code violations that were missed during inspections and she wasn't protected by the City. She said parking is a major menace and the City does nothing about it. She said that the developer hasn't mentioned if the proposed homes will be lookouts or walkouts because that will make a difference in how the water flows. She said LDK is making Golden Valley look like Maple Grove. She said this area is extremely special and rare and there are plenty of other areas to build tract homes. She said nobody wants to look at tract homes, they want something beautiful that will stand the test of time and make Golden Valley special. She said they want something better and they deserve something better. Shauna Crowe, 55 Brunswick Avenue North, asked how many homes can be constructed simultaneously because there are 10 in their area of 36 homes. She said she agrees that speed bumps would help with the traffic. Chris Gaspard, 6125 Wynnwood Road, said the City just approved a proposal to put 27 homes on a really small lot so this proposal is good compared to that. He said this proposal looks like it is being done right with beautiful homes and large sized lots and the neighbors should be happy with the renewed interest in their neighborhood. Seeing and hearing no one else wishing to comment, Kluchka closed the public hearing. Kluchka referred to the question regarding construction limits in a neighborhood and said that is an interesting idea worth consideration. Zimmerman agreed it is worth consideration, but said it would be hard to administer and to decide who would get a building permit and who wouldn't. Kluchka asked if the impact of irrigation systems is relevant. Zimmerman said he didn't know, but he would check with the City Engineer. Waldhauser stated that new irrigation systems have to be based on rain fall and moisture in the ground. She added that there needs to be more education of homeowners. Kluchka asked if the developer has an obligation to build anything, or if there is only a timeline associated with a building permit. Zimmerman stated that developers aren't required to build anything by a certain time. Kluchka asked if the building envelope on the lot adjacent to the park was required to be moved further to the north. Dornbusch said placing the house further away from park was preferable by the neighbors so that the rain garden and park area wouldn't act like the home's front yard. Waldhauser questioned how the home placement would be enforced if a future property owner wants to build in a different location, but still within the allowed buildable area. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission November 24, 2014 Page 11 Kluchka asked if there has been an agreement regarding the style or design of the homes. Segelbaum asked about the developer's obligations regarding style or design. Zimmerman stated that the subdivision process considers lot size, lot width, setbacks, etc. but not style or design. Kluchka asked about the traffic controls mentioned by the neighbors. Zimmerman said he would talk to the City Engineer about the traffic control concerns. Kluchka referred to the neighbor's suggestion that buckthorn be removed from the property and said he doesn't think developers are obligated to remove buckthorn. Johnson asked what other cities do in regard to construction management issues. Waldhauser said Edina has hired someone to make sure construction management issues are dealt with correctly. MOVED by Blum, seconded by Johnson and motion carried unanimously to recommend approval of the Paisley Fields Minor Subdivision subject to the following findings and conditions: Findings: 1. All three of the lots of the proposed subdivision meet the requirements of the R-1 Single Family Zoning District. 2. The City Engineer finds that the lots are buildable. 3. The addition of the new lots will not place an undue strain on City utility systems. Conditions: 1. The City Attorney will determine if a title review is necessary prior to approval of the Final Plat. 2. A park dedication fee of$2,146.67 shall be paid before Final Plat approval. 3. The City Engineer's memorandum, dated November 19, 2014, shall become part of this approval. 4. All applicable City permits shall be obtained prior to the development of the new lots. 6. Informal Public Hearing — Preliminary PUD Plan — Central Park West— Southwest Quadrant of 1-394 and Highway 100 — PU-121 Applicant: DLC Residential, LLC Address: Southwest Quadrant of 1-394 and Highway 100 Purpose: To allow two six-story multiple family residential buildings, a six-story hotel, two 11-story office buildings, a parking ramp and a linear park in both St. Louis Park and Golden Valley. Goellner explained the applicant's proposal to develop in both St. Louis Park and Golden Valley, two 6-story residential buildings, two 11-story office buildings, one 6-story hotel, Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission November 24, 2014 Page 12 one 7-story parking ramp, and a public park that would be privately owned and maintained. She stated that the properties located in Golden Valley are zoned Business and Professional Offices and guided for office use. She explained that this is the same site as the 2009 Towers at West End proposal for 4 office buildings and a parking ramp which received preliminary approval, but was never built. She showed the Commissioners several renderings of the proposed site and explained where the park and the phase one residential portion of the proposal would be located. She explained that generally, traffic circulates around the site on the soon to be reconstructed Utica Avenue South and the Wayzata Boulevard frontage road. Goellner referred to the residential buildings and stated that they will both be six stories in height with 550 to 1,500 square foot units that will rent for $1,000 to $2,800 per month. The phase 1 residential building will have approximately 200 units and 299 parking spaces and the phase 2 building will have approximately 164 units and 252 parking spaces. Goellner referred to the proposed hotel and explained that it will be a limited services hotel which means there won't be a restaurant or a pool. It will have approximately 150 rooms in a six story building with 93 parking spaces. She stated that the hotel use is required to have 1.5 spaces per room so it doesn't meet the number of required spaces. She added that staff has been talking with the Applicant regarding additional parking. Goellner referred to the proposed office buildings and the parking ramp and explained that there will two, 11 story buildings totaling approximately 700,000 square feet with 100 parking spaces. The parking ramp will have 2,534 spaces. Zimmerman stated that because this proposal crosses city boundaries there will be a Joint Powers Agreement between the two cities that will address issues such as inspections, permitting, emergency response, assessing, utilities, addressing, etc. He stated that there was a Joint Powers Agreement that was drafted for the previous proposal by Duke that will be revisited as a part of this proposal. He discussed the traffic impacts and reviewed the Alternative Urban Area-wide Review (AUAR) completed in 2007 and updated in 2013 and 2014. He stated that additional review is underway regarding traffic impacts on the neighborhood to the east of Highway 100 and that the previous project had called for the some improvements to the Quentin/Wayzata Boulevard intersection to help regulate the flow of traffic potentially coming from this project and some traffic calming along Wayzata Boulevard. At that point it was asked that the developer pay for those improvements. He stated that the preliminary review of the updated AUAR indicated the traffic impacts will be less given the mix of the uses in this current proposal. Zimmerman referred to the stormwater and impervious surface on the site and stated that this proposal is located in the Minnehaha Creek Watershed and as phased development occurs, individual properties within Golden Valley will be required to obtain Stormwater Management permits from the City. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission November 24, 2014 Page 13 Zimmerman referred to the parking on the properties and stated that 3,597.5 spaces are required and that that applicant is proposing 3,278 parking spaces, a difference of 319.5 spaces. He added that applicant has agreed to provide bicycle parking spaces as well. Zimmerman discussed the landscaping plan and stated that the applicant is proposing to remove approximately 36 trees and to plant 245 new trees and 19,742 square feet of shrubs and perennials. Zimmerman stated that the Applicant is proposing 79% overall impervious surface and that PUDs of this type are allowed up to 90% impervious surface. He added that there will also be underground stormwater storage as a part of this proposal as well. Zimmerman referred a site plan and discussed the access and circulation. He stated that the woonerf, which is the shared parking area for the residential buildings, also provides a service for the hotel. He stated that staff has also asked the developer to have one garbage hauler. He referred to the two access points for the hotel and stated that the Applicant has agreed to shift one access further north away from the Lilac Drive intersection. Kluchka referred to the site plan and asked if the hotel access could be limited to business use only. Zimmerman stated that the idea it to make that area difficult for cut- through traffic. Cera questioned if the connection service access is needed. Kluchka said he has seen renderings of the proposal that show public art being installed. He questioned if that is a PUD requirement. Zimmerman said that St. Louis Park requires public art. Johnson questioned how voting would be handled. Goellner said there will probably be a St. Louis Park address assigned to each of the residential buildings since that is where the front doors will be located. Blum questioned how the tax benefits would be handled between the two cities. Goellner said the value of the residential phase 1, lot 1 would be split into a percentage between the two cities. Segelbaum said the parking seems limited and asked how St. Louis Park responded. Goellner stated that the proposal meets St. Louis Park's requirements which are less stringent than Golden Valley's. Segelbaum asked what issues are being reviewed at a later date. Zimmerman stated that the woonerf area, the resolution of the hotel access point would need to be resolved before the Final PUD Plans are submitted. The offices, and the parking ramps will be developed in phase 2 and will probably require a PUD amendment. He added that the traffic flow to the east and the traffic on Wayzata Boulevard are still being reviewed and there will be more elevations along with building materials reviewed in the future. Goellner stated that Staff has also asked the Applicant for a lighting plan and for more detailed plans regarding the sidewalk connections. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission November 24, 2014 Page 14 Baker asked if the parking is phased to meet the needs of construction. Goellner said for the hotel, yes. Blum referred to the easement along the linear park and asked if it completely bisects the site. Zimmerman said there will be sidewalk connections all the way through the park. Blum asked how the intersecting pathways for pedestrians and bicyclists would work. Goellner said the sidewalk layout would change. Blum questioned where snow would be stored. Goellner said the snow could stay on site until the office buildings are constructed, after that it would have to be removed off site. Kluchka suggested making that a condition of approval. Blum questioned how much snow from the current West End development ends up in this location. Johnson asked if people will be looking at blacktop until phases 2 and 3 are built. Zimmerman stated that the park is included in phase 1. Johnson said this proposal will have a big impact for little revenue. He asked about the trade-off for the increase in traffic congestion. Baker asked if improvements could be made to Wayzata Boulevard. Zimmerman stated that the traffic engineers are reviewing the plans to determine what improvements are necessary. Baker asked if the Joint Powers Agreement could include sharing the tax benefits if there is a disproportionate impact on Golden Valley. David Graham, ESG Architects, said this proposal completes the extension of the Shops at West End. He stated that this proposal lowers the density of office space from Duke's previous proposal of 1.1 million square feet to 700,000 square feet. He discussed the park, the sidewalks, the hotel access points, and the bicycle and pedestrian traffic. He stated that this proposal is also much more green and permeable and provides a well- connected parking ramp. He stated that it made sense to locate the parking ramp, rather than the residential use, against the freeway. He said he would like to have green screens on buildings to make them look like "living buildings." He stated that the units in the residential buildings will be luxury rental condominiums and aside from the 3% affordable units, will cost $1,000 to $2,500 per month. Forty percent of the units will have 2 or 3 bedrooms to attract a wide variety of users. He stated that another key element in this project is the re-building of Utica. He showed several renderings and stated that the vision is to create a beautiful tree lined environment with residential that wraps around the parking to make it less of a suburban place and more of an integrated, pedestrian, mixed use environment. Segelbaum stated that there was a different design shown at the neighborhood meeting and asked about the reconfiguration to this current design. Graham stated that they did consider flipping the office and residential buildings, but it made more sense to create a village effect and they didn't want to have parking on the corner, they wanted that to be more of an office campus. Blum asked about the fagade of the parking structure. Graham said the parking structure will be cast concrete with scrim walls and green screening to be more artful where Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission November 24, 2014 Page 15 pedestrians will see it. Kluchka said he wants to make sure that the parking ramp doesn't look like the back of the house. He asked if the intent is to make the entire structure have some visual interest. Graham said yes. He added that they will probably focus the green walls on the west facing sides and use other strategies on the side facing the freeway. Kluchka reiterated that he wants that side to matter too. Blum referred to the site plan and asked about the small area shown between Lilac Dr. and Highway 100. Graham said that is a retaining wall and there will also be some landscaping done in that area. Luke Payne, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Civil Engineer representing DLC Residential, discussed the access points. He referred to a site plan and noted that there is an existing curb cut on Wayzata and the intent of that access point is to serve as a hotel exit and a service entrance. He said there will be underground parking, but through traffic will be discouraged. Baker asked how people would walk from the parking ramp to the hotel. Payne stated that there would most likely be a valet parking service. Kluchka said he doesn't understand how a valet would work in a low-service type of hotel. Payne said using the parking ramp is not their desirable solution as it relates to the parking shortage, it is just one option. He said that Golden Valley's parking requirement of 1.5 parking spaces per hotel room is high, one parking space per room is more typical. Waldhauser stated that there could be a street level corridor through the residential building. Segelbaum added that the goal as far as traffic flow is to stay away from the developed West End area and to channel traffic onto Utica and around onto Wayzata Boulevard. Payne said yes, Utica has been designed as the primary access point for this entire segment of the development. He discussed some of the mitigation factors mentioned in the AUAR and explained that the original AUAR assumed 1.1 million square feet of office space which is the biggest trip generator, and that this proposal is for less than that. Cera stated that the concern of the residents to the east is with traffic going through their neighborhood. He asked if there is any agreement regarding traffic calming along Wayzata Boulevard and the Highway 100 frontage road and what the applicant's thoughts are about paying for traffic calming measures. Payne said they will continue to work with staff and that they will be responsible for the improvements necessary to make this development function properly. He stated that the traffic issues and improvements brought up in the original AUAR may or may not be necessary in this development as they were in Duke's previous proposal. Cera stated that traffic is difficult in the area now, and that he would really like the Applicant to seriously consider additional traffic calming measures. Baker added that that piece of Wayzata Boulevard needs to be redesigned to accommodate bike traffic. Kluchka asked what type of hotel could be in this proposal. Graham said that the hotel will be a high quality, low-service hotel such as a Radisson Red for example. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission November 24, 2014 Page 16 Kluchka asked if the office space will be multi-tenant or single use. Graham said it could go either way. Cera asked about the timing and the phasing schedule. Graham stated that they would like to break ground on the phase 1 residential building in spring/summer of 2015, following right away with phase 2. Richard Kauffman, DLC Residential, added that the hotel construction could overlap with the phase 1 or 2 residential and that there has been strong interest in the office proposal which could begin as early as fall of 2015, or more likely 2016. Kluchka said a lot of design work has gone into the residential portion of the proposal and asked if it would be fair to say that the hotel and office plans are more conceptual at this point. Graham said they are conceptual plans, but they represent the general direction they are going with high quality, contemporary materials. Segelbaum questioned if the design of the office buildings could change if a single user wants a different design. Graham said the design could possibly change, but it would still be made of high quality materials. Kluchka opened the public hearing. Margaret Macneale, 4530 Douglas Avenue, said she and her husband became aware of this proposal through an article in the newspaper and that surprised them because the last time there was a proposal for this site the South Tyrol and Kennedy neighborhoods received several meeting notices. She said there is a great deal about DLC's plans that she likes and parts of the plans are superior to previous proposals, but her concern is traffic. She said east bound traffic on the frontage road stacks up during the evening rush hour. She said the traffic is not coming home to her neighborhood they are just trying to avoid 1-394. She said the neighborhood's input in 2007 and 2008 helped identify several traffic calming strategies including a 3-way stop at Quentin and the frontage road and the narrowing of the frontage road as it passes Natchez and Fairlawn. She said she knows the AUAR has been updated and it states that the lower density proposal may make some of the traffic improvements unnecessary. She said if more of her neighbors had an opportunity to know about this proposal and had opportunity for input she is confident that they would all want to keep every possible traffic calming strategy identified and more. She said she likes this proposal, she just wants to be sure it is a win-win for everybody. She said she fears this is flying through the process without any input from their neighborhood. Robert Lazear, 1519 Natchez Avenue South, said this is phase 2 to the whole West End project. He said there has been no attempt at communication and people haven't had a lot of time to study the proposal. He said the reduced office density is appreciated, but it is a real "rocket docket" to say they are going to build in the spring and he thinks it needs to slow down. He asked if there has been an independent traffic study done showing the impact of the current West End site because an intelligent decision can't be made without that information. He said they only have two ways out of their neighborhood and people come around the curves at 50 miles per hour. He said he likes the straight line park idea, but he thinks the parking ramp is mammoth, and he is going to be looking at Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission November 24, 2014 Page 17 and ugly ramp looming over the highway. He said pulling onto Wayzata Boulevard is tough now and emergency vehicles and accidents need to be considered as well. Dan Steinberg, 1033 Sumter Avenue South, said he was the chairman of the Cedarhurst neighborhood when the original proposal from Duke was considered. He said he is concerned he had to read about this proposal in the newspaper. He said we should be getting revenue into this area and should be looking at other needs such as a data center underneath the parking lot. He said one of the reasons the project collapsed last time is because of the sewer system and that the Environmental Commission should be addressing the watershed issues. He asked that this proposal be tabled to study the notes from the last proposal. Gary Cohen, 4530 Douglas Avenue, said he is concerned about the voting issue and it will make life really hard if people live in one city and vote in another. He said he read about this proposal in the Star Tribune and that this is a better proposal than the Duke proposal, but he is extremely frustrated to have learned about this from the newspaper. He said the 500 foot notification area is not sufficient and he has seen little or no commentary from the neighborhood. He said it would be simple to have a meeting scheduled with the neighborhood and he would be happy to help facilitate. He said the Planning Commission needs to discuss traffic calming and it is very important to him. He urged the Planning Commission to slow down and the City to do a better job of communicating because this could be a win-win for everyone if they all have a discussion. Chris Gaspard, 6125 Wynnwood Road, said 3/5 of the project is in St. Louis Park and 2/5 is in Golden Valley. He questioned why Golden Valley doesn't get 2/5 of the tax revenue of the entire site. He said we need to share everything or not because there is not much in this for Golden Valley. He said he thinks this is the most valuable land in the City and we are giving everything away for a parking ramp. He said this is a bad time of year with the holidays to be going through this process. He proposed a development called Diamond in the Valley with more residential units because this area needs more density. He questioned what is in this proposal for Golden Valley. Donna Huber, 1420 Alpine Pass, said she wants to emphasize the need for a traffic study, especially this time of year. She said snow removal in the morning is horrible, there are ice slicks on the frontage road, and she is concerned about additional traffic. Daon Karpan, 1400 Natchez Avenue South, said she wants to reinforce the need to do a traffic study. She said she wants the neighborhood voices heard. She said they need access and they need safety. Lori Komoto, 1505 Natchez Avenue South, said her main concern is traffic. She said she had to fight with the school district to get a bus stop removed from Wayzata Boulevard because of the high traffic flow in the morning. She said she feels the area is already at capacity and it is quite dangerous with the speed and the icy roads. Seeing and hearing no one else wishing to comment, Kluchka closed the public hearing. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission November 24, 2014 Page 18 Kluchka asked if a neighborhood meeting can be scheduled. Zimmerman said another neighborhood meeting can be held. He explained that hearing notices were sent to property owners within 500 feet of the subject properties, but that distance could be increased. Segelbaum said they need to discuss how far to expand that distance and if doing that would set a precedent going forward. Cera said he thinks the developer can hold a neighborhood meeting that includes all of South Tyrol. Baker said he thinks this kind of project is a category of its own and calls for a larger area to be notified. He added that it is the traffic issue that begs the need for a neighborhood meeting. Kluchka said he takes the idea of a pause seriously. He questioned the need for a neighborhood meeting and what type of conditions to put in their recommendation. Segelbaum asked about the status of the traffic study. Zimmerman stated that an AUAR was done in 2007, was updated in 2013 still using the information from the previous proposal, and was updated again for this proposal in 2014. Baker questioned to what extent the study focused on Wayzata Boulevard. Waldhauser stated that the traffic study should start from a new baseline. Kluchka said there is a re-study situation, and a winter situation that he would like to hear more about. John Crawford, Kimley Horn, explained that the 2007 study projected future background traffic and added in to that traffic the site generated which included the 1 million square feet of office space originally proposed. In 2013 the plan was updated for the reduced use of the site and the trip generation for the site was compared to the original AUAR and showed that the trip generation was less than what was originally planned. Now in 2014 this new plan has less traffic than what was in the original plan except in the morning there are more people leaving the site because of the residential use. There has not been a new traffic study since 2007 because it predicted what would happen under this development scenario. Baker said there is a new baseline now that should be taken into consideration because there has been development that wasn't predicted in 2007. Crawford said the study did predict future baseline traffic growth. Segelbaum said he thinks they need a presentation on the traffic study to determine if it is adequate for today's proposal. Baker stated that he would also like to see if there was any consideration for bicycle and pedestrian traffic in the study as well. Kluchka agreed that whatever was predicted in 2007 is not adequate today. Johnson said he left the neighborhood meeting with the understanding that the traffic in the area was at a level D, all the changes that were going to be made have been made, and there was a contingency to do something if traffic got worse, but a D is not an F. Segelbaum said he was at the same meeting and that there were some positive things about this plan, but he doesn't feel they've addressed the issues along Wayzata Boulevard. Waldhauser stated that the traffic issues along Wayzata Boulevard aren't necessarily caused by this development, but this proposal could make it worse. Kluchka stated that they need to see some better elevations of the parking ramp. Specifically, what the neighbors will see. Segelbaum said he doesn't know how the applicant will be able to provide that considering the developer will be selling it and letting someone else develop that portion. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission November 24, 2014 Page 19 Kluchka asked if the water and sewer work has been done. Zimmerman stated that the last part of that work will be done in the spring. Kluchka said he would like conditions added regarding a snow removal plan, and a design review process. Baker said they need to encourage a different revenue plan and suggested Golden Valley share the TIF revenue. Goellner said the two cities have been talking about cost and revenue sharing. Cera said he thinks the underground parking can be expanded. He said he likes the proposal and thinks it is a vast improvement over the previous proposal, but there are a lot of unanswered questions. He questioned if the proposal should be tabled or if the outstanding issues can be addressed during the Final PUD Plan process. Zimmerman said it seems that the majority of the concerns are the off-site concerns about traffic which are separate from the site concerns. Baker said he is not ready to move forward. He said he likes the proposal but he doesn't have enough information. Segelbaum agreed that he would like to see additional information, but he wants the proposal to proceed. He suggested adding conditions to allow the proposal to move forward, but still be able preserve their ability to review these issues. Waldhauser said she is wondering if more of the site could be residential. Baker said the market will drive that. Cera stated that they could vote on this Preliminary Plan with some added conditions and ask the Applicant to come back for an interim meeting. He reiterated that he thinks the proposal is good and he doesn't know if they should table it. Segelbaum asked about the impacts to the schedule if the proposal is tabled. Zimmerman stated that Staff has worked with St. Louis Park to try and align meetings so one city doesn't get too far ahead of the other. Goellner added that the cities also need time to put together the Joint Powers Agreement. Kauffman stated there are some details in the nature of the deal with Duke that requires them to move forward. He stated the previous Duke Preliminary PUD Plan proposal was approved with the same information. He added that he doesn't want to overlook the traffic concerns, but it is important to them to get a positive recommendation at this meeting. Cera said one thing that would help is if DLC would commit to a traffic calming discussion and agree to what Duke had previously agreed to do. Waldhauser said this proposal may have different needs. She suggested that the Commission recommend approval contingent on a plan that demonstrates no increase in traffic in the South Tyrol area. That way they would allow the proposal to move forward while that issue gets worked on. Baker said he would like to know whether a new traffic study is needed. If it is not needed, then this proposal can move ahead, but he is leaning toward tabling the proposal at this point. Kluchka reviewed the items he sees as potential conditions including: a snow storage plan, an updated traffic design plan, a completed neighborhood meeting, a design review for all elements, a hotel parking plan, and limiting, or not allowing any impact to the South Tyrol area. Gera asked that condition number 14 in the staff report regarding the traffic plan be changed to state that the owner shall, instead of may, submit an updated traffic plan. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission November 24, 2014 Page 20 Segelbaum suggested adding a condition number 19 stating that there shall be a neighborhood meeting, with an expanded hearing notice area, after an updated traffic study is provided, prior to the Final PUD proposal. Kluchka suggested adding a condition number 20 stating that the final design of all the elements shall be reviewed by the City prior to Final Plan approval. Cera stated that condition number 12 should be modified to state that the plans shall, instead of could, require additional underground parking. Waldhauser said she doesn't think condition number 12 needs to change because an increase in parking doesn't have to occur underground, there just needs to be additional parking. The Commissioners agreed. Segelbaum questioned if they should state that the issues they've heard about have to be addressed. Cera said there should be options to alleviate the neighbors' concerns. Segelbaum said there should be language added regarding traffic mitigation steps. Baker said there should be bicycle and pedestrian language added to the traffic mitigation steps as well. Kluchka suggested that condition 14 should be amended to include neighborhood traffic including bicycle and pedestrian traffic. Baker said this is with the understanding that the Planning Commission won't hear this proposal again until the Final PUD plan process. MOVED by Kluchka, seconded by Cera and motion carried unanimously to recommend approval of the Central Park West Preliminary PUD Plan subject to the following findings and conditions: Findings: 1. The PUD plan is tailored to the specific characteristics of the site and achieves a higher quality of site planning and design than generally expected under conventional provisions of the ordinance. 2. The PUD plan preserves and protects substantial desirable portions of the site's characteristics, open space and sensitive environmental features including steep slopes, trees, scenic views, creeks, wetlands, and open waters. 3. The PUD plan includes efficient and effective use (which includes preservation) of the land. 4. The PUD Plan results in development compatible with adjacent uses and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and redevelopment plans and goals. 5. The PUD plan is consistent with preserving and improving the general health, safety and general welfare of the people of the City. 6. The PUD plan meets the PUD Intent and Purpose provision and all other PUD ordinance provisions. Conditions: 1. The plans prepared by DLC Residential, LLC, submitted with the application on October 20, 2014, shall become a part of this approval. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission November 24, 2014 Page 21 2. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Engineering Division to Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager, dated November 17, 2014, shall become a part of this approval. 3. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Fire Department to Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager, dated November 17, 2014, shall become a part of this approval. 4. All signage must meet the requirements of the City's Sign Code (Section 4.20). 5. A park dedication fee of $70,568 (2% of the estimated land value) shall be paid prior to approval of the Final Plat. 6. The Final Plat shall include "P.U.D. No. 121" in its title. 7. This approval is subject to all other state, federal, and local ordinances, regulations, or laws with authority over this development. 8. The Final PUD plan submittal shall include continuous pedestrian connections between the hotel and parking ramp as well as around the north and east sides of the residential phase 1 building. 9. The developer shall submit a plan before the City council meeting that shows the private driveway access point shifted north on Wayzata Boulevard, as discussed in the memo from the Engineering Division to Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager, dated November 17, 2014. 10. The Developer shall address concerns and comments from the Fire Department regarding fire hydrant locations, fire truck access on Lilac Drive, and fire suppression water sources and reflect changes in the final PUD submittal. 11. The City of St. Louis Park approves that portion of the preliminary planned unit development within its jurisdiction 12. Prior to City Council preliminary review, the Developer shall present strategies to meet parking requirements for the Lot 3 hotel use, which could include additional underground hotel parking and/or a shared parking agreement with the nearby parking ramp. 13. The Final PUD plan submittal shall include bicycle parking counts and locations. 14. The property owners of any parcel in the Central Park West PUD shall follow the travel demand management plans approved for the West End Redevelopment, which will serve to reduce traffic congestion. The owner shall be required to update the plan or submit a new plan to the Golden Valley and St. Louis Park 1-394 Joint Task Force prior to Final PUD approval. The Plan shall also include bicycle and pedestrian traffic data. 15. The Developer shall enter into an agreement with the City of Golden Valley for public use of the park outlot. 16. The Final PUD plan submitted shall include a detailed Lighting Plan in accordance with the City's Outdoor Lighting requirements (Section 11.73). 17. The Applicant shall submit a snow storage plan. 18. A neighborhood meeting with the developer shall be held after an updated traffic study has been completed, but before Final PUD Plan review. The notification area for this meeting shall be expanded to include the entire South Tyrol area. 19. A final design plan shall be reviewed by the City prior to Final Plan approval. --Short Recess-- Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission November 24, 2014 Page 22 7. Reports on Meetings of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority, City Council, Board of Zoning Appeals and other Meetings Kluchka stated that the Community Center Task Force is going to get together to do a dry run of the presentation they are going to give to the City Council at the December 9 Council/Manager meeting. Baker gave an update on the recent Bottineau open house. He said there was a large turnout with an enormous amount of unhappiness about not being notified. Zimmerman stated that Staff is working with the County on ways to better communicate. Segelbaum stated that the Board of Zoning Appeals needs a Planning Commission representative to attend their November 25 meeting. Kluchka said he could attend. 8. Other Business • Council Liaison Report No report was given. 9. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 11:47 pm. Charles D. Segelbaum, Secretary Lisa Wittman, Administrative Assistant Regular Meeting of the Golden Valley Planning Commission December 8, 2014 A regular meeting of the Planning Commission was held at the Golden Valley City Hall, Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota, on Monday, December 8, 2014. Chair Kluchka called the meeting to order at 7 pm. Those present were Planning Commissioners Baker, Blum, Cera, Johnson, Kluchka, and Waldhauser. Also present was Planning Manager Jason Zimmerman, Associate Planner/Grant Writer Emily Goellner, and Administrative Assistant Lisa Wittman. Commissioner Segelbaum was absent. 1. Informal Public Hearing — Conditional Use Permit— 905 Decatur Ave N — Our World Shops, Inc. — CU-138 Applicant: Our World Shops Address: 905 Decatur Avenue North Purpose: To allow accessory retail services and/or sales incidental to a permitted use in the Industrial zoning district. Zimmerman reviewed the applicant's request for a Conditional Use Permit to allow accessory retail sales incidental to a permitted use at 905 Decatur Ave. N. The majority of the space would be used for warehouse and office use. He explained that up to 10% of a building's entire footprint can be used for accessory retail sales in the Light Industrial and Industrial zoning districts and that the Applicant is proposing to have 3,000 to 3,750 square feet (3% to 4%) of retail outlet space in the 101,100 square foot building. He stated that the property has approximately 130 parking spaces and that the applicant expects 10 to 20 cars to visit per day. He stated that the staff is recommending approval of this Conditional Use Permit proposal. Kluchka asked how many types of similar Conditional Use Permit requests the City has seen. Zimmerman stated that are a few similar Conditional Use Permits. Baker said he knows of a wholesale use nearby and asked if this is the same type of use. Zimmerman stated that wholesale and showroom uses have different requirements. The majority of the use in this case is warehouse and office space with the retail sales being incidental. Baker asked what types of products will be sold. Zimmerman said home goods. Blum asked when Conditional Use Permits expire. Zimmerman said Conditional Use Permits don't expire unless the business leaves, or there is a significant change in the use. Waldhauser asked what happens to the Conditional Use Permit if there is a new owner of the business. Zimmerman said a Conditional Use Permit amendment would be required. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission December 8, 2014 Page 2 Ben Horn, Applicant, stated that he operates six e-commerce sites that sell products from Finland, shower curtains, umbrellas, and glass collectibles. He stated that the web portion of his business accounts for approximately 91% of the revenue and the retail outlet accounts for approximately 9% of the revenue. He said he wouldn't have a retail store, except for some of the brands require him to have a physical presence. Johnson asked the Applicant why he chose Golden Valley. Horn stated that he couldn't find a space in Minneapolis that met his needs because he requires a dock and retail space but can't afford a retail building. Blum asked the Applicant how many jobs his business will provide. Horn said they have 12 full time employees and 8 to 10 part time employees depending on the time of year. Blum asked if he expects a high volume of customers. Horn stated it is really a destination shop and people won't be stopping by. He added that last year the retail sales averaged $760 per day, so it is not a high volume store. Baker asked the Applicant if he will have any signage. Horn said yes, and stated that the signage will be consistent with what the City allows. Kluchka opened the public hearing. Seeing and hearing no one wishing to comment, Kluchka closed the public hearing. Waldhauser said the proposed use seems like a reasonable fit with the area and she is in favor of recommending approval. Blum agreed and stated that there would be a minimal effect on traffic. MOVED by Johnson, seconded by Blum and motion carried unanimously to recommend approval of Conditional Use Permit at 905 Decatur Avenue North to allow accessory retail services and/or sales incidental to a permitted use in the Industrial zoning district subject to the following findings and conditions. Findings 1. The applicant has demonstrated need for the use. 2. The proposal is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. 3. There will not be a negative effect on property values in the area. 4. The traffic generated from the proposed use will not conflict with current traffic in the area. 5. The density or population in the area will not increase due to the proposed use. 6. There will not be an increase in noise by the proposed use. 7. The proposed use will not create dust, odor or excessive vibration. 8. The proposed use will not attract animal pests. 9. The proposed use will not significantly alter the visual appearance of the existing building. 10. No other negative effects of the proposed use are anticipated. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission December 8, 2014 Page 3 Conditions 1. The plans by submitted by the Applicant on November 7, 2014, shall become a part of this approval. 2. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from Fire Chief John Crelly to Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager, dated November 26, 2014, shall become part of this approval. 3. All signage must meet the requirements of the City's Sign Code (Section 4.20). 4. This approval is subject to all other state, federal, and local ordinances, regulations, or laws with authority over this development. 2. Informal Public Hearing — Preliminary PUD Plan — Struther's Parkinson's Center— 6701 Country Club Drive — PU-39, Amendment#4 Applicant: Park Nicollet Address: 6701 Country Club Drive Purpose: To allow a building addition approximately 2,700 square feet in size and the construction of an outdoor memory care walk/garden. Goellner referred to a site plan of the property and explained the applicant's request to amend their existing PUD permit to allow for a building addition and the construction of an outdoor movement/therapy garden. She stated that the proposed addition would be approximately 2,700 square feet in size and would be used as a gathering space and for expanded education, rehabilitation and training capabilities. She added that the Applicant is also proposing to create an indoor/outdoor movement therapy garden with enhanced landscaping and artwork. Goellner discussed the proposed parking on the site and stated that there are currently 181 parking spaces plus 24 proof of parking spaces at 6681 Country Club Drive. She stated that the City Code requires 158 parking spaces for clinic and office uses. After the parking area is reduced to allow for the new landscaping, there will be 160 parking spaces within the PUD which includes the property at 6681 Country Club Drive. She added that there will be a shared parking agreement and an access easement between the two property owners. Goellner stated that staff is recommending approval of the Preliminary PUD amendment plan subject to the findings and conditions recommended by Staff. Kluchka asked what "proof of parking" means. Goellner stated that it means there is space for parking available, but it is not constructed unless and until it is needed. Kluchka asked if the canopy referred to in the Fire Chief's staff report was for Struthers Parkinson's Center or for the office next door. Goellner stated that both buildings have a canopy. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission December 8, 2014 Page 4 Johnson asked for clarification that the parking will stay as is, and that no new parking spaces will be required. Goellner said yes, the proposal meets the parking requirements and that the proof of parking is not needed. Blum stated that there was a reciprocal shared parking agreement with the property next door that expired last year and asked if the City thinks the agreement is still needed. Goellner said yes and added that the property owners are working on updating that agreement. Kluchka asked if the lighting needs to be replaced. Goellner said she is not sure, but thinks the Applicant can address that issue. Rose Wichmann, Manager of the Struthers Parkinson's Center, explained that the proposed addition will be on the northwest side of the building and will give them more education space. The west side of the building will be an interior corridor they will use for rehab services and the indoor/outdoor memorial garden. She referred to the shared parking agreement and stated that the attorneys for the two properties have updated it, so it will remain in place. She submitted a letter from the attorneys clarifying that the easement rights are perpetual. She stated that they have been doing hourly parking counts to make sure they will have adequate parking. They currently have between 32 and 57 open spaces in the parking lot, so taking 16 to 18 spaces for this project should still be enough to accommodate both businesses. Baker asked Wichmann how long they have been doing the traffic counts. Wichmann said they've been doing the counts for the last month or so. Baker asked if their traffic is seasonal. Wichmann explained that Struthers Parkinson's Center is first and foremost a clinic and that traffic stays pretty much the same year-round. She added that they do educational programming conferences as well and they will still be able to accommodate that additional parking. Blum asked if there is ever a need for emergency medical transport. Wichmann said it would be extremely rare, but if they did have an emergency they would use the 911 system. Kluchka opened the public hearing. Hearing and seeing no one wishing to comment, Kluchka closed the public hearing. Baker said he thinks the parking issue needed the most attention and that it has been discussed satisfactorily. Waldhauser asked how far along the Applicant is with their tree preservation plan. Goellner said the tree preservation plan will be done as part of the Final PUD process. Waldhauser said she was surprised to see that the Applicant isn't planning for shade trees along the building and walkway and she hopes that they will. Kluchka said he wants a condition added that a design review will be done during the Final PUD review process. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission December 8, 2014 Page 5 Johnson asked if the Applicant is working with the City regarding stormwater issues. Goellner said yes. Waldhauser noted that the condition regarding shared parking can be modified since the City now knows that the existing parking agreement will stay in place. MOVED by Waldhauser, seconded by Cera and motion carried unanimously recommend approval of the Preliminary Plan for Struthers Parkinson's Center PUD No. 39, Amendment No. 4, subject to the following findings and conditions: Findings: 1. The PUD plan is tailored to the specific characteristics of the site and achieves a higher quality of site planning and design than generally expected under conventional provisions of the ordinance. 2. The PUD plan preserves and protects substantial desirable portions of the site's characteristics, open space and sensitive environmental features including steep slopes, trees, scenic views, creeks, wetlands, and open waters. 3. The PUD plan includes efficient and effective use (which includes preservation) of the land. 4. The PUD Plan results in development compatible with adjacent uses and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and redevelopment plans and goals. 5. The PUD plan is consistent with preserving and improving the general health, safety and general welfare of the people of the City. 6. The PUD plan meets the PUD Intent and Purpose provision and all other PUD ordinance provisions. Conditions: 1. The plans prepared by EAPC architects and submitted with the application on November 7, 2014, shall become a part of this approval. 2. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Fire Department to Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager, dated December 1, 2014, shall become a part of this approval. 3. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Engineering Division to Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager, dated December 1, 2014, shall become a part of this approval. 4. A shared parking agreement shall be confirmed or enacted upon or before Final PUD approval. 5. The Applicant shall submit a lighting plan that meets the requirements of the City's Outdoor Lighting Code (Section 11.73). 6. All signage must meet the requirements of the City's Sign Code (Section 4.20). 7. This approval is subject to all other state, federal, and local ordinances, regulations, or laws with authority over this development. 8. A final design plan shall be reviewed by the City prior to Final Plan approval. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission December 8, 2014 Page 6 3. Informal Public Hearing —Zoning Code Text Amendments — Amending Sections 11.03 Definitions, 11.35 Light Industrial Zoning District, and 11.36 Industrial Zoning District—ZO00-95 Applicant: City of Golden Valley Purpose: To consider amendments to the Zoning Code regarding Recycling Centers. Goellner reminded the Planning Commission that the City Council passed a moratorium regarding recycling facilities in order to consider potential changes to the definition of recycling centers as well as the appropriateness of recycling centers as permitted uses within the Light Industrial and Industrial zoning districts. Goellner stated that staff is recommending two new definitions, one for a drop-off facility and one for a recycling facility as follows: Drop-Off Facility - A facility used for the collection, sorting, storage, and transfer of non-hazardous materials for reuse in their original form or for use in manufacturing processes that do not cause the destruction of the materials in a manner that precludes further use. Compost and yard waste are prohibited materials and Recycling Facility - A facility used to prepare non-hazardous material for reuse in their original form or for use in manufacturing processes that do not cause the destruction of the materials in a manner that precludes further use. Compost and yard waste are prohibited materials. Goellner stated that staff is recommending that drop-off facilities be a conditional use in the Light Industrial zoning district and a permitted use in the Industrial zoning district and that recycling facilities be a conditional use in both the Light Industrial and Industrial zoning districts. She added that staff is also recommending that outdoor storage for both uses be prohibited, and that the distance requirements from other zoning districts remain the same as they are currently. Waldhauser suggested that drop-off facility be changed to recycling drop-off facility. Waldhauser stated that the Industrial zoning district has specific requirements regarding screening, and asked if they have the ability to impose screening requirements in the Light Industrial zoning district as well. Zimmerman stated that the Light Industrial zoning district has requirements regarding screening from the Single Family Residential zoning district and the R-2 Residential zoning district. Goellner added the Conditional Use Permit section of the City Code also talks about visual screening. Johnson asked about the costs incurred to companies that have to go through the Conditional Use Permit process. Goellner stated that applicants would have to pay to prepare their plans, for a survey of their property, and a $400 application fee. Kluchka added that many of the issues reviewed during the Conditional Use Permit process can be addressed in the applicant's narrative. Cera noted that Staff also surveyed other cities and he doesn't think their fees would be much different than Golden Valley's. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission December 8, 2014 Page 7 MOVED by Baker, seconded by Waldhauser and motion carried unanimously to recommend approval of the Zoning Code Text Amendments to Sections 11.03 Definitions, 11.35 Light Industrial Zoning District, and 11.36 Industrial Zoning District regarding recycling facilities. Cera stated that there are other housekeeping items being addressed along with the recycling language. Baker stated that the public hearing was not opened. Kluchka apologized and noted that no one was present to comment. --Short Recess-- 4. Reports on Meetings of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority, City Council, Board of Zoning Appeals and other Meetings Baker gave a report on the Bottineau Station Area Planning Committee meeting he attended and stated that the group is planning to hold a neighborhood meeting on January 7 to address some of the concerns about the Golden Valley Road station. Kluchka said he would like the Planning Commission to receive a summary or an update sometime in February. Blum added that it would be nice to see a timeline of the proposal to help better understand the process. Baker stated that the parking analysis will be discussed at the next Council/Manager meeting. Kluchka gave a report on the Community Center Task force presentation being presented at the next Council/Manager meeting. He stated that they are trying to convey that the work that has been done is more than just a feasibility study, it is a long- term plan for development. 5. Other Business • 2015 BZA Liaison The Commissioners decided that they would like to continue having a rotating schedule for the liaison to the Board of Zoning Appeals. • Council Liaison Report Schmidgall reminded the Commissioners of the upcoming neighborhood listening session (December 11) and the joint City Council/Planning Commission listening session (December 15) regarding the subdivision moratorium. He said he thinks it is a good idea to review some of things the City's done in the past regarding this issue and welcomed the Planning Commissioners involvement. 5. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 8:12 pm. Charles D. Segelbaum, Secretary Lisa Wittman, Administrative Assistant GOLDEN VALLEY OPEN SPACE & RECREATION COMMISSION Regular Meeting at Brookview Community Center Minutes October 27, 2014 1. Call to Order Mattison called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM. 2. Roll Call: Present: Commissioners Roger Bergman, John Cornelius, Kelly Kuebelbeck, Bob Mattison, Gillian Rosenquist, Anne Saffert, Jerry Sandler, Dawn Speltz and Dan Steinberg. Rick Birno, Director of Parks and Recreation; Sheila Van Sloun, Administrative Assistant; Council Member Joanie Clausen; and Golden Valley Lions Park area residents Carol Paschke and Perry Thom. Absent: None. 3. Approval of Minutes — July 28, 2014 Bergman proposed the following additions to the minutes: • Roll Call — Golden Valley residents changed to Golden Valley Lions Park area residents. • Lions Park Field Use —Adding the following to Resident Concerns: Not enough parking, Illegal parking and not enough time between games. • Lions Park Tennis Windscreen —Adding "since they cannot see through the screen" to the first sentence in paragraph 3. MOTION: Moved by Saffert and seconded by Sandler to approve the amended July 28, 2014 meeting minutes. Motion carried unanimously. 4. Tennis Court Windscreen Discussion/Recommendation — Bob Mattison Mattison said he talked with 3 different individuals involved in the tennis industry, about the use of windscreens. He shared their feedback. He then discussed advantages and disadvantages of windscreen use. Mattison said there are no city codes that would impact the use of windscreens on tennis courts in Golden Valley. After discussion, the following motion was made. MOTION: Moved by Speltz and seconded by Steinberg to make a recommendation to support windscreens and accept the donation from Twin City Tennis Camps and to support any other improvements they see fit to improve the tennis courts. Amended by Sandler to add, if the possibility arises to have windscreens that move up and down or open, that those types of windscreens could be considered on courts that are near residences. Amendment accepted by Speltz and seconded by Kuebelbeck. Motion carried unanimously. Minutes of the Open Space and Recreation Commission October 27, 2014 Page 2 5. Lions Park Parking and Traffic Issues — Bob Mattison Mattison discussed the memo of recommendations put together after a recent meeting between City staff and Golden Valley Girls Softball representatives regarding parking and traffic issues at Lions Park. He said city staff and GVGS both believe the recommendations will address the issues that were brought forward by Lions Park residents. Mattison added that if the recommendations do not effectively address the issues, the situation will have to be looked at again. Rosenquist suggested having a GVGS liaison as a main contact during tournaments for any traffic and parking issues. Mattison said he would follow up with GVGS. MOTION: Moved by Sandler and seconded by Cornelius to accept the memo of recommended actions at Lions Park for the 2015 season and ask GVGS to create a community liaison during tournament weekends to address neighborhood needs, and have city staff take communication measure to inform residents by posting on the city website and in the city newsletter. Motion carried unanimously. 6. Bottineau Update — Gillian Rosenquist Rosenquist announced a public open house being held on November 12 from 6:00-8:00 PM at the University of Minnesota Urban Research Center, located at 2001 Plymouth Avenue North in Minneapolis. The open house will provide an overview of the process, discuss neighborhood connections to all stations, and potential redevelopment around stations. Rosenquist said the Golden Valley portion of the committee met on October 22. At that meeting, the committee reviewed their focus. She said they also had a robust discussion about all the advisory meetings. 7. Community Center Update — John Cornelius and Kelly Kuebelbeck Cornelius gave details on the five different options, their locations and costs related to each. He said the committee recommended to the Council, to build on the current site. He said the committee received direction from the Council to focus on two of the five options. The task force will be working with the consultants to develop conceptual plans and budget estimates for the two options at the next committee meeting on Thursday, October 30. 8. Natural Resources Management Plan Survey Birno said the survey is available to view and participate on the city's website until October 31. He encouraged all to do so. Minutes of the Open Space and Recreation Commission October 27, 2014 Page 3 9. Sandburg Fields — Grant Application Update Birno said a Hennepin County Youth Sports Grant application has been submitted for improvements to Sandburg sports fields. He said they are requesting $325K. He said the city lines up very well with the application criteria. He said Park Valley United FC Youth Soccer Club and Armstrong Cooper Youth Baseball Association have also committed funds to the project. Birno said most of the work would be done in-house with Al Lundstrom being the Project Manager. Birno said they should know sometime in December if they received the grant. 10. Regional Parks Forum — Gillian Rosenquist Rosenquist announced a Regional Parks Forum taking place on January 17, 2015 at 10:30 AM at Roseville Public Library, located at 2180 Hamline Avenue North. She said they will be specifically discussing the part of the Metropolitan Council's 2040 Plan pertaining to regional parks. She encouraged the Commission to attend. 11. Draft Hennepin County Bike Plan Birno said a draft of the Hennepin County Bike Plan is available online at www.hennepin.us/bikeplan and open for comment through December 6. 12. Winter Recreation Trail at Brookview Birno announced that Brookview will be offering a free winter recreational trail on the golf course this winter season. It will be available beginning in December for walking, cross-country skiing, fat tire biking, and snowshoeing. He said Tonka Cycle will be providing a limited number of fat tire bikes available for rent at Brookview. He added that the grill will also be open Friday-Sunday and some winter break days with a limited menu for winter trail users and the general public. Birno said Brookview also plans to sponsor two fat tire races this winter. Saffert asked if park programs will be offered on the winter recreation trail. Birno said there will be a free snowshoe event. He hopes to expand programming down the road. 13. Hampshire Park Playground Grant Birno said the city received a grant from GameTime, Inc. for $17,665.34 for new playground equipment at Hampshire Park. He said an open house with information on the playground structures will be held at city hall on October 28. At the open house, residents will be able to vote on a new structure for the park. The equipment will be installed next spring. 14. Updates Mattison said the commission will be reviewing the open spaces map at the next commission meeting. Minutes of the Open Space and Recreation Commission October 27, 2014 Page 4 Birno said adjustable basketball hoops are being installed at Medley Park. 15. Adiournment MOTION: MOVED by Bergman and seconded by Rosenquist to adjourn at 9:15 PM. Motion carried unanimously. Bob Mattison, Chair ATTEST: Sheila Van Sloun, Administrative Assistant JOINT WATER COMMISSION MINUTES Golden Valley - Crystal - New Hope Meeting of October 28, 2014 The Golden Valley — Crystal — New Hope Joint Water Commission meeting was called to order at 2:34 p.m. in the City of Golden Valley Council Conference Room. Commissioners Present Tom Burt, City Manager, Golden Valley Anne Norris, City Manager, Crystal Kirk McDonald, City Manager, New Hope Staff Present Tom Mathisen, City Engineer, Crystal Randy Kloepper, Utilities Superintendent, Crystal Bob Paschke, Director of Public Works, New Hope Bernie Weber, Operations Manager, New Hope Dave Lemke, Utilities Supervisor, New Hope Sue Virnig, Finance Director, Golden Valley Marc Nevinski, Physical Development Director, Golden Valley Jeff Oliver, City Engineer, Golden Valley Bert Tracy, Public Works Maintenance Supervisor, Golden Valley Kelley Janes, Utilities Supervisor, Golden Valley Pat Schutrop, Administrative Assistant, Golden Valley Minutes of September 30, 2014 Meeting MOVED by Norris and seconded by McDonald to approve the minutes of the September 30, 2014 meeting as presented. Motion carried. 36-Inch Watermain Emergency Repair Update a. Inspection Results The results of the pipeline inspection conducted by Pure Technologies was received on October 17. The results indicated 9% of the pipeline is compromised; two sections are imminently ready to fail, four sections are classified as poor condition and could fail, and nine sections have broken wires that are being monitored. Based on the inspection results, the pipeline cannot be put back into service at full operating pressure. A temporary procedure has been developed where the line will be back into service at less than half of its normal operating pressure. Crystal is working with Minneapolis Water Works to allow water to run at the reduced pressure and flow rate 24 hours/day until this portion of the pipe can be repaired. About 7,892 feet of the original pipeline was not included in this inspection, meaning in addition to the sections discussed above, there could be an additional 44 locations that are compromised based on the results of the section of pipe inspected by Pure Technologies. This pipeline was constructed in 1963. The TAC recommends putting together a request for proposals and retain a qualified consultant to help the JWC develop options for repairing the watermain. Bert Tracy added that pipe replacement is an option. The cost to repair by open cut method will Joint Water Commission October 28, 2014 Page 2 of 2 be about $3 to $4 million. The commissioners agreed the proposal process should be done soon so that the costs are known before going to the three city councils. Tom Mathisen will take the lead on behalf of the TAC to organize a meeting with the TAC members to discuss selecting a consultant for the design of the repairs. Mathisen will talk to Pure Technologies to get more information prior to the TAC meeting. b. Long-Term Financial Planning of JWC System With this recent information alerting the JWC of the aging infrastructure and the need to address imminent repairs of the 36-inch watermain, the construction of the Golden Valley well will be delayed. The JWC will need to schedule a tri-city council meeting to discuss the project change. Chair Burt is concerned about paying more mobilization charges if construction of the Golden Valley well is delayed. The JWC agrees it is important to complete the two wells in Crystal and make the improvements to the New Hope well. The infrastructure repairs will affect the water rates. Once the infrastructure costs are known, the JWC can look at scheduling a tri- city council meeting. Minneapolis Park & Recreation Board Operations and Maintenance Agreement Golden Valley has been working with the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board (MPRB) to acquire an easement as part of the construction of the Golden Valley well for the emergency backup water supply project. Along with the easement agreement, the MPRB has prepared an Operations and Maintenance agreement between the JWC and the MPRB regarding the JWC's use of the easement property. MOVED by Norris and seconded by McDonald to approve the Operations and Maintenance Agreement with the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board. Motion carried. Emergency Backup Water Supply Project Update The two Crystal wells will be test pumped within the next two weeks. More specific information will be available at the next JWC meeting. County Road 9 Project Update The new JWC 24-inch pipeline has been tested and up and running. Other Business None. Next Meeting The next meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, December 3, 2014, at 1:30 p.m. Adjournment Chair Burt adjourned the meeting at 3:21 p.m. Thomas D. Burt, Chair ATTEST: Pat Schutrop, Recording Secretary 00- CP Item 4M. zIV BCWMC 11-19-14 Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission Minutes of Regular Meeting October 16,2014 Golden ValleyCity Hall,8;30 a.m. Commissioners and Staff Present: Crystal Commissioner Guy Mueller, Vice Robbinsdale Not represented Chair Golden Valley Commissioner Stacy Hoschka, St. Louis Park Commissioner Jim de Lambert,Chair Treasurer Medicine Lake Commissioner Clint Carlson Administrator Laura Jester Minneapolis Alternate Commissioner Lisa Attorney Troy Gilchrist, Kennedy&Graven Goddard Minnetonka Not represented Engineer Karen Chandler, Barr Engineering Co. New Hope Not represented Recorder Amy Herbert Plymouth Commissioner Ginny Black Technical Advisory Committee(TAC) Members/Other Attendees Present: Erick Francis,TAC, City of St. Louis Park Jeff Oliver,TAC, City of Golden Valley Christopher Gise, Golden Valley Resident Bob Paschke,TAC,City of New Hope Chris Long, TAC, City of New Hope Ben Scharenbroich, City of Plymouth Linda Loomis, Chair, Plan Steering Cmte Liz Stout,TAC, City of Minnetonka Tom Mathisen,TAC, City of Crystal Dave Tobelmann,Alternate Commissioner, City of Plymouth Richard McCoy, TAC, City of Robbinsdale Pete Willenbring, WSB &Associates(partial attendance) 1. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL On Thursday, October 16, 2014, at 8:34 a.m. in the Council Conference room at Golden Valley City Hall,Chair de Lambert called to order the meeting of the Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission(BCWMC)and asked for roll call to be taken. The Cities of Minnetonka, New Hope, and Robbinsdale were absent from the roll call. 1 BCWMC October 16, 2014, Meeting Minutes 2. CITIZEN FORUM ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS No items were raised. 3. AGENDA Administrator Jester made several announcements including reminding the Commission that the November monthly meeting will be held on Wednesday,November 19'h,the Commission's press release recognizing its volunteers has been distributed, and Tom Mathisen has announced that he will be retiring on December 5"from his role with the City of Crystal and with the BCWMC TAC. Commissioner Black moved to approve the agenda. Alternate Commissioner Goddard seconded the motion. Upon a vote,the motion carried 6-0 [Cities of Minnetonka,New Hope, and Robbinsdale absent from vote]. 4. CONSENT AGENDA Commissioner Black moved to approve the Consent Agenda. Alternate Commissioner Goddard seconded the motion. Upon a vote,the motion carried 6-0 [Cities of Minnetonka,New Hope, and Robbinsdale absent from vote]. [The following items were approved as part of the Consent Agenda: the September 18, 2014, Commission Meeting minutes,the monthly financial report,the payment of the invoices, Approval of Markay Ridge Streambank Stabilization Project in Golden Valley,Approval of Agreement with Golden Valley for Use of Channel Maintenance Funds, and Approval of Plymouth City Flats in Plymouth.] The general and construction account balances reported in the Financial Report prepared for the October 16,2014, meeting are as follows: Checking Account Balance $563,410.64 TOTAL GENERAL FUND BALANCE $563,410.64 TOTAL CASH & INVESTMENTS ON- $3,043,473.65 HAND (10/06/14) CIP Projects Levied—Budget Remaining ($2,728,308.72) Closed Projects Remaining Balance $315,164.93 2013 Anticipated Tax Levy Revenue $8,756.59 2014 Anticipated Tax Levy Revenue $428,419.50 Anticipated Closed Project Balance $752,341.02 2 BCWMC October 16, 2014, Meeting Minutes 5. PUBLIC HEARING A. Receive Comments on the Proposed 2015 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Chair de Lambert opened the public hearing and called for comments. Commissioner Black stated that she hopes the project will use as much soft armoring as it can because in the long run residents are usually happier with the soft armoring. Chair de Lambert called for additional comments. Upon hearing none, he closed the public hearing. 6. BUSINESS A. Consider Resolution Ordering 2015 Improvements Administrator Jester pointed out that approval of this resolution also approves entering into the contract with the City of Golden Valley for the City to design and construct the project. Commissioner Black asked what amount would be left in the Commission's Closed Project Fund if the Commission uses $503,000 from that fund for this Main Stem restoration project. Administrator Jester responded $250,000. Commissioner Black noted that it's possible the Commission should hold a higher amount in the Closed Project Account and that policy should be reviewed in the near future. Commissioner Black moved approval of the resolution 14-06 ordering improvements and approval of the agreement with the City of Golden Valley for construction of the Main Stem restoration project and authorization for the Recording Secretary to sign the documents(along with the Commission Chair)for the Commission Secretary. Commissioner Mueller seconded the motion. Upon a vote,the motion carried 6-0 [Cities of Minnetonka,New Hope, and Robbinsdale absent from vote]. B. Consider Approval of Agreement with City of Golden Valley for Construction of Main Stem Restoration Project(CR2015) [See Agenda item 6A]. C. Review Draft Feasibility Report for Honeywell Pond Expansion (BC-4) Administrator Jester reminded the group they had discussed this feasibility study at the September meeting but the item was tabled until this meeting to allow refinement of the study. Engineer Chandler announced that the number of options had been narrowed. She explained that option one is the Honeywell Pond expansion, and the diversion of water from Douglas Drive to the Honeywell pond. She said that options 2a and 2b include taking storm water and using it for irrigation and infiltration in different locations, and option 3 is a combination of the Honeywell pond and the storm water use option. Engineer Chandler noted that the storm water re-use option would only make sense if the Honeywell pond is expanded because there would need to be enough water in the pond to facilitate the irrigation. She pointed out that for this reason the feasibility study recommends option 1 as the priority project and options 2a and 2b can be considered if there are funds available to construct that part of the project. Administrator Jester added that options 2a and 2b aren't stand-alone projects. Alternate Commissioner Tobelmann asked if funding for the irrigation portion of the project would come from the City. Engineer Chandler pointed out the table in the memo that shows that the City is planning to contribute a significant portion of funding. There was discussion of the project cost,the status of Honeywell's interest in the irrigation option, and the effects on pond water levels by using the water for irrigation purposes. Mr. Oliver and Engineer Chandler 3 BCWMC October 16, 2014, Meeting Minutes responded to questions. Administrator Jester reiterated that the cost to the Commission of option 1 is approximately$470,000 and the Commission's cost for option 3 is approximately $795,000. She reminded the Commission that next month the group will be taking action on the Northwood Lake Improvement Project, which is also on the Commission's CIP for 2016. Administrator Jester explained that the $285,000 project cost listed in the CIP table for the Honeywell Project was a placeholder since the feasibility hadn't been undertaken to determine the cost. Commissioner Black said that she likes option 1 because it doesn't rule out the storm water reuse options but moves the project forward and allows for other projects to move forward that also have been on the Commission's CIP for a long time. Engineer Chandler pointed out that the Commission has anticipated that some portion of the Northwood Lake Improvement Project will be levied over two years. Commissioner Black stated that the cost of construction has increased since the time when the Commission set its practice of maintaining its annual levy at$1,000,000. She said that perhaps the Commission needs to re-evaluate that practice and implement a practice in which every three years the Commission looks at project costs and determines the target annual levy amount for the next three years. There was a brief discussion. Mr. Oliver stated that the City would like the Commission to support option 3, which is the design of the pond expansion along with the irrigation. He said that as of now,the City feels that the amount of funding it can commit to the project is a good estimate. He added that from a cost perspective the City would much prefer to do the pond expansion and the irrigation construction at the same time. He said if the irrigation part was done at a later time it could easily cost an extra 50%due to remobilization costs. Commissioner Black said that she would like the Commission to determine how irrigating the Honeywell property fits into the mission of the Commission. Engineer Chandler pointed out that the project will provide more phosphorous removal by including the irrigation portion of the project. Commissioner Carlson moved that the Commission commit to a preference for option 3 and that the Commission approves the feasibility study with the incorporation of the Engineer's comments. Alternate Commissioner Goddard seconded the motion. Mr. Long with the City of New Hope provided a brief update on the Northwood Lake project in New Hope and said it will come back in front of the Commission at its November meeting. Commissioner Black said that she would like to see this Golden Valley project and the New Hope project in terms of how the funding of these two projects integrates with or impacts the funding set aside for other projects on the Commissions CIP. Upon a vote,the motion carried 6-0 [Cities of Minnetonka,New Hope, and Robbinsdale absent from vote]. D. Consider Moving Forward with Twin Lake Alum Treatment Administrator Jester reminded the Commission that just over a year ago the Commission added the Twin Lake Alum Treatment project to the CIP along with other 2014 CIP projects. She said that the Commission did not order the project because the commissioners had some questions about whether or not the fish communities may shorten the effective life of the alum treatment and whether or not better water quality in recent years would be ongoing. Administrator Jester stated that a fish survey of Twin Lake was conducted by Blue Water Science and that additional water quality monitoring was conducted this year. Administrator Jester said that she and the Commission Engineers met with Jeff Oliver of Golden Valley to review the data and the situation. She stated that it is their recommendation that the Commission move ahead 4 BCWMC October 16, 2014, Meeting Minutes with the alum treatment on Twin Lake. She explained that the treatment would occur in two phases, with the first phase occurring in spring 2015. Administrator Jester said that a public outreach plan would need to be developed as well. Commissioner Black asked if it is known how long the benefits of the alum treatment would last. Engineer Chandler said that the application processes have improved so now the benefits of treatment last for decades and the feasibility study for this project reports that the benefits will last 20 years. There was a discussion on internal phosphorous loading in Twin Lake, access to the lake,and history of the area before development. Commissioner Black moved that the Commission order the alum treatment on Twin Lake and direct staff to prepare the Cooperative Agreement and the public outreach plan. Commissioner Mueller seconded the motion. Upon a vote,the motion carried 6-0 [Cities of Minnetonka,New Hope, and Robbinsdale absent from vote]. E. Receive Update on Next Generation Watershed Management Plan Development Administrator Jester pointed out that the meeting notes from the Next Generation Plan Steering Committee's August meeting is in today's meeting packet and the September meeting notes are being reviewed by the Committee. She reported that the Commission,TAC, and review agencies finished their reviews of all the policy areas at the October 8i'Commission Workshop. She said that the implementation portion of the plan has been sent around electronically to Commissioners,TAC members, and review agencies for comments since there wasn't enough time at the workshop to review and discuss it. She said that those comments will be addressed at the Plan Steering Committee's meeting on Monday. Administrator Jester announced that the Committee's goal is to have a complete draft plan for Commission review for its November meeting. She explained that at the November meeting, staff will be seeking direction to distribute the draft plan for 60-day review. Administrator Jester described the tentative timeline for the plan review and adoption. Chair de Lambert encouraged everyone to get familiar with the plan before the discussion at the November meeting. F. Review 2014 Budget Status Administrator Jester reminded the Commission that in August it asked that staff bring back at the October meeting another review of the 2014 budget status. She presented her analysis and forecast of the Commission's total expenses at the end of its fiscal year 2014. She explained that her forecast shows the Commission should be approximately$7,800 under budget by the end of the fiscal year. Administrator Jester described the three-year Next Generation Plan budget of$110,000 and reported that by the end of the current fiscal year, $94,000 of that budget will have been spent. She said that it cannot be determined at this point if the remaining budget of$16,000 will cover the remainder of the plan expenses since the Commission doesn't yet know how many comments it will receive during the comment period and how much time the Commission will need to spend reviewing and responding to the comments. Engineer Chandler provided more detail on the status of the 2014 engineering budget. Administrator Jester said that it is her recommendation that the Commission does not stop any Commission programs or projects at this time. The Commission agreed with her recommendation. G. Review Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Memo Erick Francis,TAC Chair, reported that the TAC met and discussed CIP projects in Table 5-3 in the draft 5 BCWMC October 16, 2014, Meeting Minutes Watershed Plan and had many suggested changes to the table, which were incorporated into the version reviewed at the Commission workshop. He stated that the TAC began discussing needed revisions to the Commission's Requirements Document. He said that the TAC recommends that the Commission Engineer bring recommended changes for the Requirements Document and related discussion items to future Commission meetings and TAC meetings. Mr. Francis described how the TAC began developing guidelines for annualized costs per pound of pollutant removal from CIP projects. He said that the TAC recommends the Commission Engineer develop draft guidelines for methods to use in future feasibility studies for review and discussion at a future TAC meeting. He reported that the TAC recommends that the Commission's November meeting be held on Wednesday, November 19 since many TAC members will attend the annual American Public Works Association conference held November 20 and 21. 7. COMMUNICATIONS A. Administrator: i. Administrator Jester announced that the bid opening for the 2012 Main Stem project in Wirth Project was held, and she is waiting for a report on the results. ii. Administrator Jester reported on her meetings out in the field with the River Watch teachers and students. iii. Administrator Jester said that she sent out an email yesterday to schedule a meeting of the Administrative Services Committee. iv. Administrator Jester reported that the Bassett Creek Watershed's success in delisting Wirth Lake from the Impaired Waters List is slated to be the front cover of the report on Clean Water Funds for the Clean Water Council. V, Administrator Jester communicated that yesterday she spoke with an MPCA staff person about Schaper Pond and whether the City can take credit in its MS4 permit for Sweeney Lake. She said that staff person reported that the MPCA is working on this issue internally and staff has recommendations that will be forwarded to MPCA management. B. Chair: i. Chair de Lambert reported on his attendance at the Minnesota Water Resources Conference and the number of compliments he received on behalf of the Commission and its work. C. Commissioners: i. Commissioner Hoschka reported on a field trip that she,Jeff Oliver, and Eric Eckman facilitated for students of the Perpich Center for the Arts. D. TAC Members: No TAC Communications E. Committees:No Committee Communications F. Legal Counsel: No Legal Communications 6 BCWMC October 16, 2014, Meeting Minutes G. Engineer: i. Engineer Chandler reported on some of her discussions at the Minnesota Water Resources Conference. ii. Engineer Chandler announced the opportunity to come to hear the Commissioner of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency speak next week at Barr Engineering Company, 8. INFORMATION ONLY (Available at http://www.bassettcreekw m o.o rg/Meetings/2014/2014- Octo ber/20140ctoberMeetingPacket.htm) A. Grant Tracking Summary and Spreadsheet B. WMWA September 2014 Meeting Minutes C. WCA Notices, Plymouth D. BWSR Snapshots Article on Wirth Lake E. Invitation to Metro Blooms Garden Awards Event 11/6 F. Invitation to Mississippi River Forum 10/17: Can we harvest rainwater for Indoor Use? G. Invitation to Metropolitan Council Water Resources Policy Plan Workshops 10/21, 10/23,or 10/30 H. Invitation to a talk at Barr Engineering Company by MPCA Commissioner 9. ADJOURNMENT Chair de Lambert adjourned the Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission Regular Meeting at 10:28 a.m. Amy Herbert, Recorder Date Secretary Date 7 city 0f goldeniv,1'4� MEMORANDUM valley City Administration/Council 763-593-8003/763-593-8109(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting January 6, 2015 Agenda Item 3. H. Appointment of Assistant Weed Inspectors Prepared By Shep Harris, Mayor Summary By State Statute (MS 18.80), "The supervisors of each town board and the mayor of each city shall act as local weed inspectors within their respective municipalities." However, state law allows the city to appoint an assistant weed inspector to act on behalf of the municipality. The appointed assistant (or assistants) has the power, authority, and responsibility of the mayor in the capacity of weed inspector. I nominate Dave Gustafson, Fire/Property Maintenance Specialist; Don Nutter, Fire/Property Maintenance Specialist;Al Lundstrom, Park Supervisor and Tim Teynor, Assistant Forester,to serve as the Assistant Weed Inspectors. Recommended Action Motion to appoint Dave Gustafson, Don Nutter, Al Lundstrom and Tim Teynor, as the Assistant Weed Inspectors for a one-year term. Luedke, Kris Subject: FW: Parking at the Golden Valley Station From:jeremy roth<jeremusL&hotmail.com> Date: December 17, 2014 at 11:19:06 CST To: Cynthia Carow<cicarow a��mail.com>, "jclausenngoldenvalleymn. ov" <iclausena,goldenvalleymn.gov>, "lfonnestngoldenvalleymn.gov" <IfonnestLa goldenvalleymn.gov>, "sschmidgall(a�goldenvalleymmn_g_ov" <sschmidgall(a,goldenvalleymn. oovv>, "asnopeggoldenvalleymn. oovv" <asnopera�goldenvalleymn.Jov>, "sharris goldenvalleymn. ov" <sharriskgold.envalleymn.gov> Ce: "rep,mike.freibery a),house.mn" <rep.mike.freibergLahouse.mn>, "annr9senate.mn" <annr a,senate.mn> Subject: RE: Parking at the Golden Valley Station Dear Representatives, Please add me in the numbers of those who oppose plans that would favor street parking for those using the light rail station at the Golden Valley Rd/Theo Wirth Parkway intersection. I feel commuters parking on the streets in my neighborhood would be very detrimental for various reasons (as outlined to you by many of my neighbors). Thanks for considering us, Jeremy Roth 2309 York Ave. N. Golden Valley, MN 55422 t city 0fV MEMORANDUM zolde,".1.1v4v ^ valley Planning Department J 763-593-8095/763-593-8109(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting January 6, 2015 Agenda Item 3. J. Approval of Plat -Ski Hill Park Prepared By Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager Summary At the December 16, 2014, City Council meeting, the Council held a public hearing on the Preliminary Plat for the minor subdivision of Paisley Fields (250 Paisley Lane). After the hearing, the Council approved the Preliminary Plat which will allow three lots. The Final Plat, renamed Ski Hill Park, has now been presented to the City. Staff has reviewed the Final Plat and finds it consistent with the approved Preliminary Plat and the requirements of City Code. Attachments • Resolution for Approval of Plat-Ski Hill Park (1 page) • Final Plat of Ski Hill Park (1 page) Recommended Action Motion to adopt Resolution for Approval of Plat-Ski Hill Park. Resolution 15-02 January 6, 2015 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION FOR APPROVAL OF PLAT - SKI HILL PARK WHEREAS, the City Council for the City of Golden Valley, pursuant to due notice, has heretofore conducted a public hearing on the proposed plat to be known as Ski Hill Park covering the following described tracts of land: Lot 2, Block 2, "Tralee," except that part thereof described as follows: Commencing at the Northwesterly corner of said Lot 2; thence South along the line dividing Lot 2 from Lot 3 a distance of 156.15 feet to Ski Hill Road; thence Easterly along the line dividing Ski Hill Road from said Lot 2 a distance of 10 feet; thence Northwesterly in a straight line of the point of beginning. And Lot 3; and that part of Lot 2, described as follows: Commencing at the Northwesterly corner of said Lot 2; thence South along the line dividing Lot 2 from Lot 3 a distance of 156.15 feet to Ski Hill Road; thence Easterly along the line dividing Ski Hill Road from said Lot 2 a distance of 10 feet; thence Northwesterly in a straight line to the point of beginning, Block 2, "Tralee". WHEREAS, all persons present were given the opportunity to be heard, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council for the City of Golden Valley, that said proposed plat be, and the same hereby is, accepted and approved, and the proper officers of the City are hereby authorized and instructed to sign the original of said plat and to do all other things necessary and proper in the premises. Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by the City Clerk. SKI HILL PARK IR.TDOC. NO. Northwest corner of Lot 2,"TRALEE" (4In witness whereof said James A.Soderberg and Heidi A.Soderberg,husband and wife,have hereunto set their hands this_day of ,2015. 4 "RALEE') - S89'39'59"E 469.46i - 199.77 / 21,11 51.96 James A.Soderberg Heidi A.Soderberg F STATE OF COUNTY OF 10 This instrument was acknowledged before me on this day of ,2O15,by James A.Soderberg and Heidi A.Soderberg,husband and wife. ol•µ r r. III �— / / U3ui .. ' ( N /' /n N` Nota ryPrintetl Name Notary Public, _ C K m \\ �//// / / // I My Commission Expires 3 6 137.1.E 3 224 3p soo W Y 0 /// // I,Thomas J.Adam do hereby certify that this plat was prepared by me or under my direct supervision;that 1 am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor In the State of Minnesota;that / �?� / _ this plat is a correct representation of the boundarysurvey;that all mathematical data and labels are correctly designated on this plat;that all monuments depicted on this plat have been,or will be correctly set within one year;that all water boundaries and wet lands,as defined In Minnesota Statutes,Section 505.01,Subd.3,as of the date of this certificate are shown and labeled on this plat;and all public ways are shown and labeled on this plat. Dated this day of ,2015. Thomas J.Adam,Licensed Land Surveyor Minnesota License No.43414 67.29 ...--. r__ ycj� m� \v/' 0 i, 3�8�02"W R=136.89 �A �O S80° 0=28°O915STATE OF MINNESOTA h�j \ M1 (67.4"7 qA r)9"`P COUNTY OF DAKOTA S �ry9 56 �pQ' This instrument was acknowledged before me on this day of ,2015,by Thomas J.Adam. tpu S85'TR49'07EE) �r, \ Notary Printed Name Notary Public,Minnesota My Commission Expires January 31,2015 Drainage and Utility Easements are shown thus: 6 6 CITY COUNCIL,CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY,MINNESOTA I I 0 20 40 80 120 This plat of SKI HILL PARK was approved and accepted by the City Council of the City of Golden Valley,Minnesota at a regular meeting thereof held this day of 2015. If applicable,the written comments and recommendations of the Commissioner of Transportation and the County Highway Engineer have 6 6 Scale in Feet been received by the City or the prescribed 30-day period has elapsed without receipt of such comments and recommendations,as provided by Minnesota Statutes,Section ------� -—————— 505.03,Subdivision 2. ,. The south line of Lot 4,Block 5,"TRALEE",has a City Council,City of Golden Valley,Minnesota bearing of S89°45'39"W. Being 6 feet In width and adjoining side lot (XXX.XX) Denotes dimension from the plat lines and being 10 feet in width and adolning of"TRALEE" block lines. • Denotes iron monument found By ,Mayor By ,Clerk O Denotes 1/2 inch by 14 inch Iron monument set and marked by Minnesota License No.43414 RESIDENT AND REAL ESTATE SERVICES,Hennepin County,Minnesota KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS:That Andrew M.Dornbusch and Martha C.Dornbusch,husband and wife,fee owners of the following described property situated in the I hereby certify that the taxes payable in 2015 and prior years have been paid for land described on this plat,dated this day of ,2015. County of Hennepin,State of Minnesota to wit: Lot 2,Block 2,"Tralee",except that part thereof described as follows: Commencing at the Northwesterly corner of said Lot 2;thence South along the line dividing Lot 2 Mark V.Chapin,County Auditor By: ,Deputy from Lot 3 a distance of 156.15 feet to Ski Hill Road;thence Easterly along the line dividing Ski Hill Road from said Lot 2 a distance of 10 feet;thence Northwesterly in a straight line to the point of beginning. and that James A.Soderberg and Heidi A.Soderberg,husband and wife,fee owners of the following described property situated In the County of Hennepin,State of Minnesota to wit: SURVEY DIVISION,Hennepin County,Minnesota Lot 3;and that part of Lot 2,described as follows: Commencing at the Northwesterly comer of said Lot 2;thence South along the line dividing Lot 2 from Lot 3 a distance of 156.15 feet to Ski Hill Road;thence Easterly along the line dividing Ski Hill Road from said Lot 2 a distance of 10 feet;thence Northwesterly In a straight line to the point of Pursuant to MN.STAT.Section 3838.565(1969),this plat has been approved this_day of ,2015. beginning,Block 2,"Tralee". Have caused the same to be surveyed and platted as SKI HILL PARK and do hereby dedicate to the public for public use the drainage and utility easements as created by this plat. Chris F.Mavis,County Surveyor By: In witness whereof said Andrew M.Dornbusch and Martha C.Dornbusch,husband and wife,have hereunto set their hands this day of ,2015. REGISTRAR OF TITLES,Hennepin County,Minnesota Andrew M.Dombusch Martha C.Dornbusch I hereby certify that the within plat of SKI HILL PARK was Filed in this office this day of ,2015,at o'clock Y. STATE OF COUNTY OF Martin McCormick,Registrar of Titles By: ,Deputy This Instrument was acknowledged before me on this day of ,2015,by Andrew M.Dornbusch and Martha C.Dornbusch,husband and wife. Notary Printed Name Notary Public, My Commission Expires Rehder and Associates, Inc. tJ y = 4�1 Iden MEMORANDUM ,Valle Y Public Works Department 763-593-8030/763-593-3988(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting January 6, 2015 Agenda Item 3. K. Approve Master Partnership Contract Between the City of Golden Valley and State of Minnesota Prepared By Jeff Oliver, PE, City Engineer Mark Ray, PE, Street Maintenance Supervisor Summary In 2009, the City entered into a Master Partnership Contract with the State of Minnesota. This Contract expired in the summer of 2014. The contract is a document that can be utilized for either the Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) or the City to perform work cooperatively for the other when both parties deem it beneficial. Projects that can be done under the agreement range from signal construction/modifications to small paving projects. Some of the basic provisions of the agreement are as follows: 1. The agreement ends June 30, 2017. 2. The agreement outlines the responsibilities for both parties. 3. Types of maintenance/construction work that may be included under the agreement are detailed. 4. Under the agreement, work orders for specific projects are developed to implement each project. 5. Identifies City and Mn/DOT personnel authorized to execute work orders to perform such work on behalf of their respective agencies. Attached resolution identifies the City's authorized representative. This contract has been used in the last few years to upgrade the pedestrian push buttons and indications at traffic signals (City purchased the equipment and Mn/DOT provided the labor), replace non-working traffic signal indications (which the City is responsible for) over mainline Highway 55, and implement the flashing yellow arrow operation at Xenia Avenue and Golden Hills Drive. The contract is a proven tool for Mn/DOT and the City to work together to implement projects in a more cost-effective manner. A resolution is required to be adopted by the City to enter into the agreement and to designate the City's authorized representative for executing work orders. Attachments • Resolution Authorizing the Master Partnership Contract with the State of Minnesota (1 page) • Master Partnership Contract (14 pages) Recommended Action Motion to adopt the Resolution Authorizing the Master Partnership Contract with the State of Minnesota. Resolution 15-03 January 6, 2015 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING MASTER PARTNERSHIP CONTRACT WITH THE STATE OF MINNESOTA WHEREAS, The Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) wishes to cooperate closely with local units of government to coordinate the delivery of transportation services and maximize the efficient delivery of such services at all levels of government; and WHEREAS, Mn/DOT and local governments are authorized by Minnesota Statutes sections 471.59, 174.02, and 161.20, to undertake collaborative efforts for the design, construction, maintenance and operation of state and local roads; and WHEREAS, the parties wish to able to respond quickly and efficiently to such opportunities for collaboration, and have determined that having the ability to write "work orders" against a master contract would provide the greatest speed and flexibility in responding to identified needs; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Golden Valley, Minnesota, as follows: 1. That the City of Golden Valley enter into a Master Partnership Contract with the Minnesota Department of Transportation, a copy of which was before the Council. 2. That the following City officer is authorized to execute such contract, and any amendments thereto: Golden Valley City Manager That the City Manager is authorized to negotiate work order contracts pursuant to the Master Contract, which work order contracts may provide for payment to or from Mn/DOT, and that the City Manager may execute such work order contracts in accordance with Exhibit A on behalf of the City without further approval by this Council. Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by the City Clerk. MnDOT Agreement # 07365 STATE OF MINNESOTA AND CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY MASTER PARTNERSHIP CONTRACT This master contract is between the State of Minnesota,acting through its Commissioner of Transportation hereinafter referred to as the"State"and City of Golden Valley acting through its City Council,hereinafter referred to as the"Local Government". Recitals I. The parties are authorized to enter into this agreement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §§15.061, 471.59 and 174.02. 2. Minnesota Statutes Section 161.20, subdivision 2 authorizes the Commissioner of Transportation to make arrangements with and cooperate with any governmental authority for the purposes of constructing, maintaining and improving the trunk highway system. 3. Each party to this Contract is a"road authority"as defined by Minnesota Statutes §160.02 (subd. 25). 4, Minnesota Statutes Section 161.39, subdivision 1, authorizes a road authority to perform work for another road authority. Such work may include providing technical and engineering advice, assistance and supervision, surveying, preparing plans for the construction or reconstruction of roadways, and performing roadway maintenance. 5. Minnesota Statues §174.02(subd. 6)authorizes the Commissioner of Transportation to enter into agreements with other governmental entities for research and experimentation; for sharing facilities, equipment, staff, data, or other means of providing transportation-related services; or for other cooperative programs that promote efficiencies in providing governmental services, or that further development of innovation in transportation for the benefit of the citizens of Minnesota. 6. Each party wishes to occasionally procure services from the other party, which the parties agree will enhance the efficiency of delivering governmental services at all levels. This Master Partnership Contract provides a framework for the efficient handling of such requests.This Master Partnership Contract contains terms generally governing the relationship between the parties hereto. When specific services are requested,the parties will (unless otherwise specified herein)enter into a"Work Order"contracts. 7. Subsequent to the execution of this Master Partnership Contract,the parties may(but are not required to) enter into"Work Order"contracts. These Work Orders will specify the work to be done, timelines for completion, and compensation to be paid for the specific work. 8. The parties are entering into this Master Partnership Contract to establish terms that will govern all of the Work Orders subsequently issued under the authority of this Contract. Master Contract 1. Term of Master Contract; Use of Work Order Contracts; Survival of Terms 1.1. Effective Date:This contract will be effective on the date last signed by the Local Government, and all State officials as required under Minn. Stat. § 16C.05, subd. 2. 1.2. A party must not accept work under this Contract until it is fully executed. 1.3. Expiration Date. This Contract will expire on June 30,2017. CM Master Partnership Contract(CM Rev.05/21/13) Page I of 14 MnDOT Agreement# 07365 1.4. Work Order Contracts. A work order contract must be negotiated and executed(by both the State and the Local Government)for each particular engagement, except for Technical Services provided by the State to the Local Government as specified in Article 2. The work order contract must specify the detailed scope of work and deliverables for that engagement. A party must not begin work under a work order until such work order is fully executed. The terms of this Master Partnership Contract will apply to all work orders issued hereunder, unless specifically varied in the work order. The Local Government understands that this Master Contract is not a guarantee of any payments or work order assignments, and that payments will only be issued for work actually performed under fully-executed work orders. 1.5. Survival of Terms. The following clauses survive the expiration or cancellation of this master contract and all work order contracts: 12. Liability; 13. State Audits; 14. Government Data Practices and Intellectual Property; 17, Publicity; 18. Governing Law, Jurisdiction, and Venue; and 22. Data Disclosure. All terms of this Master Contract will survive with respect to any Work Order issued prior to the expiration date of the Master Contract. 1.6. Sample Work Order. A sample work order contract is available upon request from the State. 2. Technical Services 2.1, Technical Services include repetitive low-cost services routinely performed by the State for the Local Government. These services may be performed by the State for the Local Government without the execution of a work order,as these services are provided in accordance with standardized practices and processes and do not require a detailed scope of work. Technical services are limited to the following services: 2.1.EPavement Striping, Sign and Signal Repair, Bridge Load Ratings, Bridge and Structure Inspections, Minor Bridge Maintenance, Minor Road Maintenance(such as guard rail repair and sign knockdown repair), Pavement Condition Data, Materials Testing and Carcass Removal. 2.1.2. Every other service not falling under the services listed in 2.1.1 will require a Work Order contract. 2.2. The Local Government may request the State to perform Technical Services in an informal manner, such as by the use of email,a purchase order, or by delivering materials to a State lab and requesting testing. A request may be made via telephone,but will not be considered accepted unless acknowledged in writing by the State. 2.3. The State will promptly inform the Local Government if the State will be unable to perform the requested Technical Services. Otherwise,the State will perform the Technical Services in accordance with the State's normal processes and practices, including scheduling practices taking into account the availability of State staff and equipment. 2.4. Payment Basis. Unless otherwise agreed to by the parties prior to performance of the services, the State will charge the Local Government the State's then-current rate for performing the Technical Services. The then-current rate may include the State's normal and customary labor additives. The State will invoice the Local Government upon completion of the services, or at regular intervals not more than once monthly as agreed upon by the parties. The invoice will provide a summary of the Technical Services provided by the State during the invoice period. 3. Services Requiring A Work Order Contract 3.1. Work Order Contracts: A party may request the other party to perform any of the following services under individual work order contracts. CM Master Partnership Contract(CM Rev.05/21/13) Page 2 of 14 MnDOT Agreement# 07365 3.2. Professional and Technical Services. A party may provide professional and technical services upon the request of the other party. As defined by Minnesota Statutes §16C.08 (subd. 1) professional/technical services "means services that are intellectual in character, including consultation, analysis, evaluation, prediction,planning, programming, or recommendation; and result in the production of a report or completion of a task". Professional and technical services do not include providing supplies or materials except as incidental to performing such services. Professional and technical services include(by way of example and without limitation) engineering services, surveying, foundation recommendations and reports, environmental documentation, right-of-way assistance(such as performing appraisals or providing relocation assistance, but excluding the exercise of the power of eminent domain), geometric layouts, final construction plans,graphic presentations, public relations, and facilitating open houses. A party will normally provide such services with its own personnel; however, a party's professional/technical services may also include hiring and managing outside consultants to perform work provided that a party itself provides active project management for the use of such outside consultants. 3,3. Roadway Maintenance. A party may provide roadway maintenance upon the request of the other party. Roadway maintenance does not include roadway reconstruction. This work may include but is not limited to snow removal, ditch spraying, roadside mowing, bituminous mill and overlay (only small projects), seal coat, bridge hits, major retaining wall failures, major drainage failures, and message painting. All services must be performed by an employee with sufficient skills, training, expertise or certification to perform such work, and work must be supervised by a qualified employee of the party performing the work. 3.4. Construction Administration. A party may administer roadway construction projects upon the request of the other party. Roadway construction includes(by way of example and without limitation)the construction, reconstruction, or rehabilitation of mainline, shoulder, median, pedestrian or bicycle pathway, lighting and signal systems, pavement mill and overlays,seal coating, guardrail installation, and channelization.These services may be performed by the Providing Party's own forces, or the Providing Party may administer outside contracts for such work. Construction administration may include letting and awarding construction contracts for such work(including state projects to be completed in conjunction with local projects). All contract administration services must be performed by an employee with sufficient skills, training, expertise or certification to perform such work. 3.5. Emergency Services. A party may provide aid upon request of the other party in the event of a man-made disaster,natural disaster or other act of God. Emergency services includes all those services as the parties mutually agree are necessary to plan for, prepare for, deal with, and recover from emergency situations. These services include, without limitation, planning, engineering, construction, maintenance,and removal and disposal services related to things such as road closures,traffic control, debris removal, flood protection and mitigation, sign repair, sandbag activities and general cleanup, Work will be performed by an employee with sufficient skills, training, expertise or certification to perform such work, and work must be supervised by a qualified employee of the party performing the work. If it is not feasible to have an executed work order prior to performance of the work,the parties will promptly confer to determine whether work may be commenced without a fully-executed work order in place. If work commences without a fully-executed work order,the parties will follow up with execution of a work order as soon as feasible. 3.6. When a need is identified,the State and the Local Government will discuss the proposed work and the resources needed to perform the work. If a party desires to perform such work,the parties will negotiate the specific and detailed work tasks and cost. The State will then prepare a work order contract. Generally, a work order contract will be limited to one specific CM Master Partnership Contract(CM Rev.05;21/13) Page 3 of 14 MnDOT Agreement# 07365 project/engagement, although"on call"work orders may be prepared for certain types of services, especially for"Technical Services"items as identified section 2.1.2. The work order will also identify specific deliverables required, and timeframes for completing work. A work order must be fully executed by the parties prior to work being commenced. The Local Government will not be paid for work performed prior to execution of a work order and authorization by the State. 4. Responsibilities of the Providing Party The party requesting the work will be referred to as the"Requesting Party"and the party performing the work will be referred to as the"Providing Party". Each work order will set forth particular requirements for that project/engagement. 4.1. Terms Applicable to ALL Work Orders. The terms in this section 4.1 will apply to ALL work orders. 4.1.1. Each work order will identify an Authorized Representative for each party. Each party's authorized representative is responsible for administering the work order, and has the authority to make any decisions regarding the work, and to give and receive any notices required or permitted under this Master Contract or the work order. 4.1.2. The Providing Party will furnish and assign a publicly employed licensed engineer (Project Engineer),to be in responsible charge of the project(s)and to supervise and direct the work to be performed under each work order. For services not requiring an engineer,the Providing Party will furnish and assign another responsible employee to be in charge of the project. The services of the Providing Party under a work order may not be otherwise assigned, sublet, or transferred unless approved in writing by the Requesting Party's authorized representative. This written consent will in no way relieve the Providing Party from its primary responsibility for the work. 4.1.3. If the Local Government is the Providing Party,the Project Engineer may request in writing specific engineering and/or technical services from the State, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 161.39. The work order may require the Local Government to deposit payment in advance or may, at the State's option,permit payment in arrears. If the State furnishes the services requested,the Local Government will promptly pay the State to reimburse the state trunk highway fund for the full cost and expense of furnishing such services. The costs and expenses will include the current State labor additives and overhead rates, subject to adjustment based on actual direct costs that have been verified by audit. 4.1.4. Only the receipt of a fully executed work order contract authorizes the Providing Party to begin work on a project. Any and all effort, expenses, or actions taken by the Providing Party before the work order contract is fully executed is considered unauthorized and undertaken at the risk of non-payment. 4.1.5. In connection with the performance of this contract and any work orders issued hereunder, the Providing Agency will comply with all applicable Federal and State laws and regulations. When the Providing Party is authorized or permitted to award contracts in connection with any work order,the Providing Party will require and cause its contractors and subcontractors to comply with all Federal and State laws and regulations. 4.2. Additional Terms for Roadway Maintenance. The terms of section 4.1 and this section 4.2 will apply to all work orders for Roadway Maintenance. 4.2.1. Unless otherwise provided for by agreement or work order,the Providing Party must obtain all permits and sanctions that may be required for the proper and lawful performance of the work. CM Master Partnership Contract(CM Rev.05/21/13) Page 4 of 14 MnDOT Agreement # 07365 4.2.2. The Providing Party must perform maintenance in accordance with MnDOT maintenance manuals, policies and operations. 4.2.3. The Providing Party must use State-approved materials, including(by way of example and without limitation), sign posts,sign sheeting, and de-icing and anti-icing chemicals. 4.3. Additional Terms for Construction Administration. The terms of section 4.1 and this section 4.3 will apply to all work orders for construction administration. 4.3.1. Contract(s)must be awarded to the lowest responsible bidder or best value proposer in accordance with state law. 4.3.2. Contractor(s) must be required to post payment and performance bonds in an amount equal to the contract amount. The Providing Party will take all necessary action to make claims against such bonds in the event of any default by the contractor. 4.3.3. Contractor(s)must be required to perform work in accordance with the latest edition of the Minnesota Department of Transportation Standard Specifications for Construction. 4.3.4. For work performed on State right-of-way, contractor(s)must be required to indemnify and hold the State harmless against any loss incurred with respect to the performance of the contracted work, and must be required to provide evidence of insurance coverage commensurate with project risk. 4.3.5. Contractor(s) must pay prevailing wages pursuant to applicable state and federal law. 4.3.6. Contractor(s) must comply with all applicable Federal, and State laws, ordinances and regulations, including but not limited to applicable human rights/anti-discrimination laws and laws concerning the participation of Disadvantaged Business Enterprises in federally- assisted contracts 4.3.7. Unless otherwise agreed in a Work Order, each party will be responsible for providing rights of way, easement, and construction permits for its portion of the improvements. Each party will, upon the other's request,furnish copies of right of way certificates, easements, and construction permits. 4.3.8. The Providing Party may approve minor changes to the Requesting Party's portion of the project work if such changes do not increase the Requesting Party's cost obligation under the applicable work order. 4.3.9. The Providing Party will not approve any contractor claims for additional compensation without the Requesting Party's written approval, and the execution of a proper amendment to the applicable work order when necessary. The Local Government will tender the processing and defense of any such claims to the State upon the State's request. 4.3.10. The Local Government must coordinate all trunk highway work affecting any utilities with the State's Utilities Office. 4.3.11, The Providing Party must coordinate all necessary detours with the Requesting Party. 4.3.12. If the Local Government is the Providing Party, and there is work performed on the trunk highway right-of-way,the following will apply: CM Master Partnership Contract(CM Rev.05/21/13) Page 5 of 14 MnDOT Agreement# 07365 4.3.12.1 The Local Government will have a permit to perform the work on the trunk highway. The State may revoke this permit if the work is not being performed in a safe, proper and skillful manner, or if the contractor is violating the terms of any law,regulation, or permit applicable to the work. The State will have no liability to the Local Government, or its contractor, if work is suspended or stopped due to any such condition or concern. 4.3.12.2 The Local Government will require its contractor to conduct all traffic control in accordance with the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, 4.3.12.3 The Local Government will require its contractor to comply with the terms of all permits issued for the project including, but not limited to,NPDES and other environmental permits. 4.3.12.4 All improvements constructed on the State's right-of-way will become the property of the State. 5. Responsibilities of the Requesting Party 5.1. After authorizing the Providing Party to begin work,the Requesting Party will furnish any data or material in its possession relating to the project that may be of use to the Providing Party in performing the work. 5.2. All such data furnished to the Providing Party will remain the property of the Requesting Party and will be promptly returned upon the Requesting Party's request or upon the expiration or termination of this contract(subject to data retention requirements of the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act and other applicable law). 5.3. The Providing Party will analyze all such data furnished by the Requesting Party. If the Providing Party finds any such data to be incorrect or incomplete,the Providing Party will bring the facts to the attention of the Requesting Party before proceeding with the part of the project affected. The Providing Party will investigate the matter, and if it finds that such data is incorrect or incomplete, it will promptly determine a method for furnishing corrected data. Delay in furnishing data will not be considered justification for an adjustment in compensation. 5.4. The State will provide to the Local Government copies of any Trunk Highway fund clauses to be included in the bid solicitation and will provide any required Trunk Highway fund provisions to be included in the Proposal for Highway Construction,that are different from those required for State Aid construction. 5.5. The Requesting Party will perform final reviews and/or inspections of its portion of the project work. If the work is found to have been completed in accordance with the work order contract, the Requesting Party will promptly release any remaining funds due the Providing Party for the Project(s). 5.6. The work order contracts may include additional responsibilities to be completed by the Requesting Party. 6. Time In the performance of project work under a work order contract,time is of the essence. 7. Consideration and Payment 7.1. Consideration. The Requesting Party will pay the Providing Party as specified in the work order. The State's normal and customary labor additives will apply to work performed by the State, unless otherwise specified in the work order. The State's normal and customary labor additives will not apply if the parties agree to a"lump sum"or"unit rate"payment. CM Master Partnership Contract(CM Rev.05/21/13) Page 6 of 14 MnDOT Agreement# 07365 7.2. State's Maximum Obligation. The total compensation to be paid by the State to the Local Government under all work order contracts issued pursuant to this Master Contract will not exceed$50,000.00. 7.3. Travel Expenses. It is anticipated that all travel expenses will be included in the base cost of the Providing Party's services,and unless otherwise specifically set forth in an applicable work order, the Providing Party will not be separately reimbursed for travel and subsistence expenses incurred by the Providing Party in performing any work order contract. In those cases where the State agrees to reimburse travel expenses, such expenses will be reimbursed in the same manner and in no greater amount than provided in the current "MnDOT Travel Regulations"a copy of which is on file with and available from the MnDOT District Office. The Local Government will not be reimbursed for travel and subsistence expenses incurred outside of Minnesota unless it has received the State's prior written approval for such travel. 7.4. Payment. 7.4.1. Generally. The Requesting Party will pay the Providing Party as specified in the applicable work order, and will make prompt payment in accordance with Minnesota law. 7.4.2. Payment by the Local Government. 7.4.2.1. The Local Government will make payment to the order of the Commissioner of Transportation. 7.4.2.2, IMPORTANT NOTE: PAYMENT MUST REFERENCE THE "MNDOT CONTRACT NUMBER" SHOWN ON THE FACE PAGE OF THIS CONTRACT AND THE "INVOICE NUMBER" ON THE INVOICE RECEIVED FROM MNDOT. 7.4.2.3. Remit payment to the address below: MnDOT Attn: Cash Accounting RE: MnDOT Contract Number 07365 and Invoice Number###### Mail Stop 215 395 John Ireland Blvd St. Paul, MN 55155 7.4.3. Payment by the State. 7.4.3.1. Generally. The State will promptly pay the Local Government after the Local Government presents an itemized invoice for the services actually performed and the State's Authorized Representative accepts the invoiced services. Invoices must be submitted as specified in the applicable work order, but no more frequently than monthly. 7.4.3.2. Retainage.for Professional and Technical Services. For work orders for professional and technical services,as required by Minn. Stat. § 16C.08, subd. 5(b),no more than 90 percent of the amount due under any work order contract may be paid until the final product of the work order contract has been reviewed by the State's authorized representative. The balance due will be paid when the State's authorized representative determines that the Local Government has satisfactorily fulfilled all the terms of the work order contract. CM Master Partnership Contract(CM Rev.05/21/13) Page 7 of 14 MnDOT Agreement# 07365 8. Conditions of Payment All work performed by the Providing Party under a work order contract must be performed to the Requesting Party's satisfaction, as determined at the sole and reasonable discretion of the Requesting Party's Authorized Representative and in accordance with all applicable federal and state laws,rules,and regulations. The Providing Party will not receive payment for work found by the State to be unsatisfactory or performed in violation of federal or state law. 9. Local Government's Authorized Representative and Project Manager; Authority to Execute Work Order Contracts 9.1. The Local Government's Authorized Representative for administering this master contract is the Local Government's Engineer,and the Engineer has the responsibility to monitor the Local Government's performance. The Local Government's Authorized Representative is also authorized to execute work order contracts on behalf of the Local Government without approval of each proposed work order contract by its governing body. 9.2, The Local Government's Project Manager will be identified in each work order contract. 10. State's Authorized Representative and Project Manager 10.l, The State's Authorized Representative for this master contract is the District State Aid Engineer, who has the responsibility to monitor the State's performance. 10,2. The State's Project Manager will be identified in each work order contract. 11. Assignment,Amendments,Waiver,and Contract Complete 11.1. Assignment. Neither party may assign or transfer any rights or obligations under this Master Contract or any work order contract without the prior consent of the other and a fully executed Assignment Agreement, executed and approved by the same parties who executed and approved this Master Contract,or their successors in office. 11.2. Amendments. Any amendment to this master contract or any work order contract must be in writing and will not be effective until it has been executed and approved by the same parties who executed and approved the original contract, or their successors in office. 11.3. Waiver. If a party fails to enforce any provision of this master contract or any work order contract,that failure does not waive the provision or the party's right to subsequently enforce it. l l.4. Contract Complete. This master contract and any work order contract contain all negotiations and agreements between the State and the Local Government.No other understanding regarding this master contract or any work order contract issued hereunder, whether written or oral may be used to bind either party. 12. Liability. Each party will be responsible for its own acts and omissions to the extent provided by law. The Local Government's liability is governed by Minnesota Statutes chapter 466 and other applicable law. The State's liability is governed by Minnesota Statutes section 3.736 and other applicable law. This clause will not be construed to bar any legal remedies a party may have for the other party's failure to fulfill its obligations under this master contract or any work order contract. Neither party agrees to assume any environmental liability on behalf of the other party. A Providing Party under any work order is acting only as a"Contractor"to the Requesting Party,as the term"Contractor"is defined in Minnesota Statutes §11513.03 (subd. 10), and is entitled to the protections afforded to a"Contractor"by the Minnesota Environmental Response and Liability Act. The parties specifically intend that Minnesota Statutes §471.59 subdivision 1 a will apply to any work undertaken under this Master Contract and any work order issued hereunder. CM Master Partnership Contract(CM Rev.05/21/13) Page 8 of 14 MnDOT Agreement# 07365 13. State Audits Under Minn. Stat. § 16C.05, subd. 5,the party's books,records, documents, and accounting procedures and practices relevant to any work order contract are subject to examination by the parties and by the State Auditor or Legislative Auditor, as appropriate, for a minimum of six years from the end of this Master Contract. 14. Government Data Practices and Intellectual Property 14.1. Government Data Practices. The Local Government and State must comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minn. Stat. Ch. 13,as it applies to all data provided by the State under this Master Contract and any work order contract, and as it applies to all data created, collected,received, stored, used,maintained, or disseminated by the Local Government under this Master Contract and any work order contract. The civil remedies of Minn. Stat. § 13.08 apply to the release of the data referred to in this clause by either the Local Government or the State. 14.2. Intellectual Property Rights 14.2.1. Intellectual Property Rights, The Requesting Party will own all rights,title, and interest in all of the intellectual property rights,including copyrights, patents,trade secrets, trademarks, and service marks in the Works and Documents created and paid for under work order contracts. Works means all inventions, improvements, discoveries (whether or not patentable), databases, computer programs, reports,notes, studies, photographs, negatives, designs, drawings, specifications,materials,tapes, and disks conceived, reduced to practice, created or originated by the Providing Party, its employees, agents, and subcontractors, either individually or jointly with others in the performance of this master contract or any work order contract. Works includes"Documents."Documents are the originals of any databases, computer programs, reports, notes, studies, photographs, negatives, designs, drawings, specifications,materials,tapes,disks, or other materials,whether in tangible or electronic forms, prepared by the Providing Party, its employees, agents, or contractors, in the performance of a work order contract. The Documents will be the exclusive property of the Requesting Party and all such Documents must be immediately returned to the Requesting Party by the Providing Party upon completion or cancellation of the work order contract. To the extent possible,those Works eligible for copyright protection under the United States Copyright Act will be deemed to be"works made for hire."The Providing Party Government assigns all right, title, and interest it may have in the Works and the Documents to the Requesting Party. The Providing Party must, at the request of the Requesting Party, execute all papers and perform all other acts necessary to transfer or record the Requesting Party's ownership interest in the Works and Documents. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Requesting Party grants the Providing Party an irrevocable and royalty-free license to use such intellectual property for its own non-commercial purposes, including dissemination to political subdivisions of the state of Minnesota and to transportation-related agencies such as the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. 14.2.2. Obligations with Respect to Intellectual Property. 14.2.2.1. Notification. Whenever any invention, improvement, or discovery(whether or not patentable) is made or conceived for the first time or actually or constructively reduced to practice by the Providing Party, including its employees and subcontractors, in the performance of the work order contract, the Providing Party will immediately give the Requesting Party's Authorized Representative written notice thereof, and must promptly furnish the CM Master Partnership Contract(CM Rev.05/21/13) Page 9 of 14 MnDOT Agreement 4 07365 Authorized Representative with complete information and/or disclosure thereon. 14.2.2.2. Representation. The Providing Party must perform all acts,and take all steps necessary to ensure that all intellectual property rights in the Works and Documents are the sole property of the Requesting Party,and that neither Providing Party nor its employees, agents or contractors retain any interest in and to the Works and Documents. 15. Affirmative Action The State intends to carry out its responsibility for requiring affirmative action by its Contractors, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §363A.36. Pursuant to that Statute,the Local Government is encouraged to prepare and implement an affirmative action plan for the employment of minority persons,women, and the qualified disabled, and submit such plan to the Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Human Rights. In addition, when the Local Government lets a contract for the performance of work under a work order issued pursuant to this Master Contract, it must include the following in the bid or proposal solicitation and any contracts awarded as a result thereof: 15.1. Covered Contracts and Contractors. If the Contract exceeds$100,000 and the Contractor employed more than 40 full-time employees on a single working day during the previous 12 months in Minnesota or in the state where it has its principle place of business,then the Contractor must comply with the requirements of Minn. Stat. § 363A.36 and Minn. R. Parts 5000.3400-5000.3600. A Contractor covered by Minn. Stat. § 363A.36 because it employed more than 40 full-time employees in another state and does not have a certificate of compliance, must certify that it is in compliance with federal affirmative action requirements. 15.2. Minn. Stat. §363A.36. Minn. Stat. § 363A.36 requires the Contractor to have an affirmative action plan for the employment of minority persons,women, and qualified disabled individuals approved by the Minnesota Commissioner of Human Rights ("Commissioner")as indicated by a certificate of compliance. The law addresses suspension or revocation of a certificate of compliance and contract consequences in that event.A contract awarded without a certificate of compliance may be voided. 15.3. Minn. R. Parts 5000.3400-5000.3600. 15.3.1. General. Minn. R. Parts 5000.3400-5000.3600 implement Minn. Stat. § 363A.36. These rules include, but are not limited to, criteria for contents, approval, and implementation of affirmative action plans; procedures for issuing certificates of compliance and criteria for determining a contractor's compliance status; procedures for addressing deficiencies, sanctions, and notice and hearing; annual compliance reports; procedures for compliance review; and contract consequences for non-compliance. The specific criteria for approval or rejection of an affirmative action plan are contained in various provisions of Minn. R. Parts 5000.3400-5000.3600 including, but not limited to, parts 5000.3420-5000.3500 and 5000.3552-5000.3559. 15.3.2. Disabled Workers. The Contractor must comply with the following affirmative action requirements for disabled workers: 15.3.2.1. The Contractor must not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of physical or mental disability in regard to any position for which the employee or applicant for employment is qualified. The Contractor agrees to take affirmative action to employ, advance in employment, and otherwise treat qualified disabled persons without discrimination based upon their physical or mental disability in all employment CM Master Partnership Contract(CM Rev.05/21/13) Page 10 of 14 MnDOT Agreement# 07365 practices such as the following: employment, upgrading, demotion or transfer, recruitment, advertising, layoff or termination, rates of pay or other forms of compensation, and selection for training, including apprenticeship. 15.3.2.2. The Contractor agrees to comply with the rules and relevant orders of the Minnesota Department of Human Rights issued pursuant to the Minnesota Human Rights Act. 15.3.2.3. In the event of the Contractor's noncompliance with the requirements of this clause, actions for noncompliance may be taken in accordance with Minnesota Statutes Section 363A.36, and the rules and relevant orders of the Minnesota Department of Human Rights issued pursuant to the Minnesota Human Rights Act. 15.3.2.4. The Contractor agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, notices in a form to be prescribed by the commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Human Rights. Such notices must state the Contractor's obligation under the law to take affirmative action to employ and advance in employment qualified disabled employees and applicants for employment, and the rights of applicants and employees. 15.3.2.5. The Contractor must notify each labor union or representative of workers with which it has a collective bargaining agreement or other contract understanding, that the Contractor is bound by the terms of Minnesota Statutes Section 363A.36, of the Minnesota Human Rights Act and is committed to take affirmative action to employ and advance in employment physically and mentally disabled persons. 15.3.3. Consequences. The consequences for the Contractor's failure to implement its affirmative action plan or make a good faith effort to do so include, but are not limited to, suspension or revocation of a certificate of compliance by the Commissioner, refusal by the Commissioner to approve subsequent plans, and termination of all or part of this contract by the Commissioner or the State. 15.3.4. Certification. The Contractor hereby certifies that it is in compliance with the requirements of Minn. Stat. § 363A.36 and Minn. R. Parts 5000.3400-5000.3600 and is aware of the consequences for noncompliance. 16. Workers' Compensation Each party will be responsible for its own employees for any workers compensation claims. This Master Contract,and any work orders issued hereunder,are not intended to constitute an interchange of government employees under Minnesota Statutes §15.53. To the extent that this Master Contract,or any work order issued hereunder, is determined to be subject to Minnesota Statutes §15.53, such statute will control to the extent of any conflict between the Contract and the statute. 17. Publicity 17.1. Publicity. Any publicity regarding the subject matter of a work order contract where the State is the Requesting Party must identify the State as the sponsoring agency and must not be released without prior written approval from the State's Authorized Representative. For purposes of this provision, publicity includes notices, informational pamphlets, press releases,research, reports, signs, and similar public notices prepared by or for the Local Government individually or jointly with others, or any subcontractors, with respect to the program, publications, or services provided resulting from a work order contract. CM Master Partnership Contract(CM Rev.05/21/13) Page I I of 14 MnDOT Agreement# 07365 17.2. Data Practices Act, Section 17.1 is not intended to override the Local Government's responsibilities under the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act. 18. Governing Law,Jurisdiction, and Venue Minnesota law, without regard to its choice-of-law provisions, governs this master contract and all work order contracts. Venue for all legal proceedings out of this master contract or any work order contracts, or the breach of any such contracts, must be in the appropriate state or federal court with competent jurisdiction in Ramsey County, Minnesota. 19. Prompt Payment; Payment to Subcontractors The parties must make prompt payment of their obligations in accordance with applicable law. As required by Minn. Stat. § 16A.1245,when the Local Government lets a contract for work pursuant to any work order,the Local Government must require its contractor to pay all subcontractors, less any retainage, within 10 calendar days of the prime contractor's receipt of payment from the Local Government for undisputed services provided by the subcontractor(s)and must pay interest at the rate of one and one-half percent per month or any part of a month to the subcontractor(s)on any undisputed amount not paid on time to the subcontractor(s). 20. Minn. Stat. § 181.59.The Local Government will comply with the provisions of Minn. Stat. § 181.59 which requires: Every contract for or on behalf of the state of Minnesota, or any county, city,town, township,school, school district, or any other district in the state,for materials, supplies, or construction shall contain provisions by which the Contractor agrees: (1)That, in the hiring of common or skilled labor for the performance of any work under any contract,or any subcontract,no contractor, material supplier, or vendor, shall, by reason of race,creed, or color,discriminate against the person or persons who are citizens of the United States or resident aliens who are qualified and available to perform the work to which the employment relates; (2)That no contractor,material supplier, or vendor, shall, in any manner, discriminate against, or intimidate, or prevent the employment of any person or persons identified in clause(1)of this section,or on being hired, prevent, or conspire to prevent,the person or persons from the performance of work under any contract on account of race, creed, or color; (3)That a violation of this section is a misdemeanor; and(4)That this contract may be canceled or terminated by the state, county, city, town, school board,or any other person authorized to grant the contracts for employment, and all money due, or to become due under the contract, may be forfeited for a second or any subsequent violation of the terms or conditions of this contract. 21. Termination; Suspension 21.1. Termination by the State for Convenience. The State or commissioner of Administration may cancel this Master Contract and any work order contracts at any time, with or without cause, upon 30 days written notice to the Local Government. Upon termination,the Local Government and the State will be entitled to payment, determined on a pro rata basis,for services satisfactorily performed. 21.2. Termination by the Local Governmentfor Convenience. The Local Government may cancel this Master Contract and any work order contracts at any time, with or without cause, upon 30 days written notice to the State. Upon termination,the Local Government and the State will be entitled to payment, determined on a pro rata basis,for services satisfactorily performed. 21.3. Termination for Insufficient Funding, The State may immediately terminate or suspend this Master Contract and any work order contract if it does not obtain funding from the Minnesota legislature or other funding source; or if funding cannot be continued at a level sufficient to allow for the payment of the services covered here. Termination or suspension must be by written or fax notice to the Local Government, The State is not obligated to pay for any services that are provided after notice and effective date of termination or suspension. However,the Local CM Master Partnership Contract(CM Rev.05/21/13) Page 12 of 14 MnDOT Agreement# 07365 Government will be entitled to payment, determined on a pro rata basis,for services satisfactorily performed to the extent that funds are available. The State will not be assessed any penalty if the master contract or work order is terminated because of the decision of the Minnesota legislature or other funding source, not to appropriate funds. The State must provide the Local Government notice of the lack of funding within a reasonable time of the State's receiving that notice. 22. Data Disclosure Under Minn. Stat. §270C.65, subd. 3, and other applicable law,the Local Government consents to disclosure of its federal employer tax identification number, and/or Minnesota tax identification number, already provided to the State,to federal and state tax agencies and state personnel involved in the payment of state obligations. These identification numbers may be used in the enforcement of federal and state tax laws which could result in action requiring the Local Government to file state tax returns and pay delinquent state tax liabilities, if any. 23. Defense of Claims and Lawsuits If any lawsuit or claim is filed by a third party(including but not limited to the Local Government's contractors and subcontractors), arising out of trunk highway work performed pursuant to a valid work order issued under this Master Contract,the Local Government will, at the discretion of and upon the request of the State,tender the defense of such claims to the State or allow the State to participate in the defense of such claims. The Local Government will, however, be solely responsible for defending any lawsuit or claim, or any portion thereof, when the claim or cause of action asserted is based on its own acts or omissions in performing or supervising the work. The Local Government will not purport to represent the State in any litigation, settlement, or alternative dispute resolution process. The State will not be responsible for any judgment entered against the Local Government, and will not be bound by the terms of any settlement entered into by the Local Government except with the written approval of the Attorney General and the Commissioner of Transportation and pursuant to applicable law. 24. Additional Provisions [The balance of this page has intentionally been left blank—signature page follows] CM Master Partnership Contract(CM Rev.05/21/13) Page 13 of 14 MnDOT Agreement 4 07365 LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION The Local Government certifies that the appropriate person(s) have executed the contract on behalf of the Local Government as required by applicable ordinance, resolution, or charter provision. By: By: (with delegated authority) Title: Title Division Director Date: Date: COMMISSIONER OF ADMINISTRATION By: As delegated to Materials Management Division Title By: Date: Date: CM Master Partnership Contract(CM Rev.05/21/13) Page 14 of 14 it l ) E CY01i'len MEMORANDUM alley Administrative Services Department 763-593-8013/763-593-3969(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting January 6, 2015 Agenda Item 3. L. Resolution Relating to the Financing of Capital Equipment; Establishing Compliance with Reimbursement Bond Regulations under the Internal Revenue Code Prepared By Susan Virnig, Finance Director Summary The following resolution will allow the city to be reimbursed for expenditures related to the purchases of capital equipment and vehicles. Because expenditures may be made prior to the sale of bonds, this reimbursement agreement is need per IRS Rules. Attachments • Resolution Relating to the Financing of Capital Equipment; Establishing Compliance with Reimbursement Bond Regulations under the Internal Revenue Code (3 pages) Recommended Action Motion to adopt Resolution relating to the Financing of Capital Equipment; Establishing Compliance with Reimbursement Bond Regulations under the Internal Revenue Code. Resolution 15-04 January 6, 2015 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE FINANCING OF CAPITAL EQUIPMENT; ESTABLISHING COMPLIANCE WITH REIMBURSEMENT BOND REGULATIONS UNDER THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Golden Valley, Minnesota (the "City"), as follows: 1. Recitals. (a) The Internal Revenue Service has issued Section 1.150-2 of the Income Tax Regulations (the "Regulations") dealing with the issuance of bonds all or a portion of the proceeds of which are to be used to reimburse the City for project expenditures made by the City prior to the date of issuance. (b) The Regulations generally require that the City make a declaration of its official intent to reimburse itself for such prior expenditures out of the proceeds of a subsequently issued series of bonds within 60 days after payment of the expenditures, that the bonds be issued and the reimbursement allocation be made from the proceeds of such bonds within the reimbursement period (as defined in the Regulations), and that the expenditures reimbursed be capital expenditures or costs of issuance of the bonds. (c) The City desires to comply with requirements of the Regulations with respect to the projects hereinafter identified. 2. Official Intent Declaration. (a) The City proposes to acquire certain capital equipment described on Exhibit A hereto (the "Project"), and to make original expenditures with respect thereto prior to the issuance of reimbursement bonds, and reasonably expects to issue reimbursement bonds for the Project, in one or more series, in an amount not to exceed $750,000. (b) Other than (i) de minimis amounts permitted to be reimbursed pursuant to Section 1.150-2(f)(1) of the Regulations or (ii) expenditures constituting preliminary expenditures as defined in Section 1.150-2(f)(2) of the Regulations, the City will not seek reimbursement for any original expenditures with respect to the foregoing Project paid more than 60 days prior to the date of adoption of this resolution. All original expenditures for which reimbursement is sought will be capital expenditures or costs of issuance of the reimbursement bonds. 3. Budgetary Matters. As of the date hereof, there are no City funds reserved, pledged, allocated on a long term basis or otherwise set aside (or reasonably expected to be reserved, pledged, allocated on a long term basis or otherwise set aside) to provide permanent financing for the original expenditures related to the Project, other than pursuant to the issuance of the reimbursement bonds. Consequently, it is not expected that the issuance of the reimbursement bonds will result in the creation of any replacement proceeds. Resolution 15-04 - Continued January 6, 2015 4. Reimbursement Allocations. The City's Finance Director shall be responsible for making the "reimbursement allocations" described in the Regulations, being generally the transfer of the appropriate amount of proceeds of the reimbursement bonds to reimburse the source of temporary financing used by the City to make payment of the original expenditures relating to the Project. Each reimbursement allocation shall be made within 30 days of the date of issuance of the reimbursement bonds, shall be evidenced by an entry on the official books and records of the City maintained for the reimbursement bonds and shall specifically identify the original expenditures being reimbursed. Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by the City Clerk. Exhibit A Marked Squads Computer and Printers Phone System Unmarked Police Vehicle Rotary Mower Bobcat Toolcat Passenger Vehicle (Fire) Pickup Truck (Fire) Pickup Truck (Park) 800 MHZ Radios (Fire) 800 MHZ Radios (Police) City t) go ldc- n M ipi n A, N rt,) U M valley Administrative Services Department 763-593-8013/763-593-3969 (fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting January 6, 2015 Agenda Item 3. M. Approval of Use of Credit Cards for Purchases Prepared By Sue Virnig, Finance Director Summary The Legislature has authorized the use of credit cards by cities, but the legislation requires prior City Council approval of those employees who will be using the cards on behalf of the City. The following are the credit cards issued: Store issued credit cards: • BP Amoco (2) o Police Commander (1) • SuperAmerica (2) o Police Commander (1) • Northern Tool • Sears • Home Depot (2) Non-store issued cards: • US Bank (employee will sign use of purchasing card program) Not all businesses accept purchase orders from the City. The stores listed above have credit cards with their business name on them. The credit cards are kept in the Finance Department except for the two noted that are in safekeeping by the Operations Commander in the Police Department. All use will need to be approved by the supervisor before any purchase is made. The US Bank is a purchasing/credit card with the employee's name on it. These cards will be used only if no other form of payment is accepted. Each employee given authority will sign a use of card policy with terms of acceptable use. An employee may keep the card for a period of time with approval from the supervisor. Any credit card payment is included on the bi-monthly check registers approved by the City Council. Therefore, staff is recommending that the Council authorize the use of the credit cards listed above by any City employee, who has received prior approval from the appropriate supervisor or the City Manager's designee. Recommended Action Motion to approve usage of credit cards by any city employee who has received prior approval from the appropriate supervisor and approved by the Finance Director and/or City Manager. Ci t cad s, , 5a T ,)n.. - u a valley Planning Department 763-593-80951763-593-8109 (fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting January 6, 2015 Agenda Item 3. N. Approval of Plat - Brunswick Estates Prepared By Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager Summary At the December 16, 2014, Council meeting, the Council held a public hearing on the Preliminary Plat for the minor subdivision of Brunswick Estates (108 Brunswick Avenue North). After the hearing, the Council approved the Preliminary Plat which will allow two lots. The Final Plat of Brunswick Estates has now been presented to the City. Staff has reviewed the Final Plat and finds it consistent with the approved Preliminary Plat and the requirements of City Code. Attachments • Resolution for Approval of Plat - Brunswick Estates (1 page) • Final Plat of Brunswick Estates (1 page) Recommended Action Motion to adopt Resolution for Approval of Plat- Brunswick Estates. Resolution 15-05 January 6, 2015 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION FOR APPROVAL OF PLAT - BRUNSWICK ESTATES WHEREAS, the City Council for the City of Golden Valley, pursuant to due notice, has heretofore conducted a public hearing on the proposed plat to be known as Brunswick Estates covering the following described tracts of land: Lot 10, Block 5, "TRALEE" WHEREAS, all persons present were given the opportunity to be heard; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council for the City of Golden Valley, that said proposed plat be, and the same hereby is, accepted and approved, and the proper officers of the City are hereby authorized and instructed to sign the original of said plat and to do all other things necessary and proper in the premises. Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by the City Clerk. R.T. DOC. N0. BRUNSWICK ESTATES KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That Wooddole Edina LLC,a Minnesota limited liability company, owner, of the following described property situated in the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota to wit: T Lot 10, Block 5, 'TRALEE`. o / Has caused the some to be surveyed and platted as BRUNSWICK ESTATES and does hereby dedicate to the public for public use the drainage and utility r easements as created by this plat. // \`-�r" f df <� In witness whereof said Wooddale Edina LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, has caused these presents to be signed by Its proper officer this_day // 09�a of 20 t Wooddole Edina LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company 4$ n ' asN STATE OF MINNESOTA �p COUNTY OF This instrument was acknowledged before me on this this_day of 20_, by os of Wooddole Edina LLC, a Minnesota limited Iiabdity company, on behalf of the company. ( I 1 I i I to n r rN i Notary Public, County, My Commission Expires / L I`J I ` t T- e3 ! I 1 '�1�'- n SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE ! I I I I Peter J. Hawkinson do hereby certify that this plat was prepared by me or under my direct supervision; that I am o duly Licensed Land Surveyor in the State )I T �) /� ; r of Minnesota; that this plot is o correct representation of the boundary survey, that all mathematical data and labels are correctly designated on this plot; that ( \ / \ �._ It t all monuments depicted on this plat have been, or will be correctly set within one year; that all water boundaries and wet lands, as defined in Minnesota / I I 1 Statutes, Section 505.01, Subd. 3, as of the date of this certificate are shown and labeled on this plat; and all public ways are shown and labeled on this plat. ((! B L 0 C K I �I L Dated this_IT6-day of 0ere04el 20It/ I I . /4F/� /.l / I / I ajr_ I Peter J. Hawkinson, Licensed Land Surveyor / I y' Minnesota License No. 42299 ( I v I I I �0/l L� L I I 1 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF A L" o This instrument was acknowledged before me on this IV/a/ 1°%,-1-0 14 by Peter J. Hawkinson. N`or n •17r ,� J 1yo I Notary Public, County, �. S73.43 / o —.ti;k1 1 My Commission Expires- ast-m 1-Le"., 4t E CITY COUNCIL, Golden Valley, Minnesota T / ras.ny -n ,�-1 1 C7 I to 1 1 / This plat of BRUNSWICK ESTATES was approved and accepted by the City of Golden Valley, Minnesota, at o regular meeting thereof,held this_day of �- J 20�. if applicable, the written comments and recommendations of the Commissioner of Transportation and the County Highway Lj•> Ps$g•�� Aa � Engineer have been received by the City or the prescribed 30 day period has elapsed without receipt of such comments and recommendations, as provided by Minnesota Stotutes, Section 505.03,Subdivision 2. By By. Mayor Clerk RESIDENT AND REAL ESTATE SERVICES, Hennepin County, Minnesota �� •, f A� I hereby certify that taxes payable in 20_and prior years have been paid for land described on this Plat,doted this _day of n `. 20� - �j Mark V. Chapin, County Auditor By. r Deputy SURVEY DIVISION, Hennepin County, Minnesota ORIENTATION OF THIS BEARING SYSTEM IS BASED ON THE Pursuant to MINN. STAT. Sec. 3838.565(1969)this plat has been approved this _day of 20_. SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF LOT 1, BLOCK 1, TRALEE HILLS, WHICH IS ASSUMED TO HAVE A BEARING OF NORTH 63°5234" WEST. Christ F. Movis,County Surveyor By O DENOTES SET 1/2 BY 14 INCH INCH IRON POPE MONUMENT MARKED BY LICENSE NUMBER 42299, OR WILL REGISTRAR OF TITLES, Hennepin County, Minnesota BE SET IN ACCORDANCE WITH MS 505.021, SUBD. 10.. I hereby certify that the within plat of BRUNSWICK ESTATES was filed in this office this_day of 20_,at _o clock M 10 0 20 DENOTES FOUND 1/2 INCH IRON MONUMENT MARKED BY 20 LICENSE NUMBER 42299 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. Martin McCormick, Registrar of Titles By. Scale in Feet Deputy PI*NEERev P.A. x.�. -= �� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� � � �� ���� �� ���� �J� �� ��� ��� � J� �-� ���� ��� �� ��� �� � � � � � �� �� �� �� � valley _ ~_-C �- ks Department artment 763-593-8Q30/763-593-3988(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting January 6� 2015 Agenda Item 4. A. Public Hearing for: 2015 Pavement Management Program, Project 15-01 2O16Pavement Management Program, Project 16-0l 3Ol7Pavement Management Program, Project I7-Ol Prepared By Jeff Oliver, PE, City Engineer Summary At its July 16, 2013, City Council meeting, Council directed staff to prepare a feasibility report for the 2015 Pavement Management Program (PMP). The proposed 2015 project included rehabilitation nfZ.3miles oflocal streets. During the preliminary design of the project, it was determined that the existing sanitary sewers and vvaterrnainsvvere in extremely poor condition. The replacement costs and rehabilitation costs for these systems far exceeded the utility budget. Therefore, Council directed staff tosplit the project into three small projects in order towork within budget atits November lZ, 3Ul4Council/Manager meeting. Based upon this utility constraint, the project was split into three phases to be constructed in 2015, 2016 and 2017. The resultant feasibility report for these projects includes rehabilitation of 0.71 miles of street in 2015, 0.5 miles of street in 2016, and 1.0 rni|en of street in 20I7. The streets included in each project are shown onthe attached project location map. The feasibility report for these projects has been prepared by the consulting engineering firm of Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc, and will be presented at the public hearing. The feasibility report outlines a project that includes reconstruction of the subject streets, replaces and repairs the sanitary sewer and water systems, and includes storm drainage improvements throughout the project area. The estimated total project costs for each year are: 2Ol5: Estimated Project [ost $2'570,000 ZO16: Estimated Project Cost $1,845,000 2OI7: Estimated Project Cost $4,000,000 The estimated costs include all street rehabilitation, sanitary sewer and watermain repair and replacement, and storm sewer construction. An estimated 25% of the construction costs have been included for indirect project costs, which includes project design, staking, construction observation, administration, and legal expenses. The special assessment for the proposed projects is $6,600 for each residential unit. The special assessment rate for multi-family housing on a residential street is $76.30 per front foot; and the rate for properties with other zoning on residential streets is $91.73 per front foot. The estimated special assessments are consistent with the City of Golden Valley Special Assessment Policy and do not include any assessments for optional assessments to properties for private driveway reconstruction or sanitary sewer service rehabilitation. The proposed financing for each of the three years is as follows: 2015 PMP 2016 PMP 2017 PMP Sewer and Water Reserve Fund $760,000 $435,000 $870,000 Storm Sewer Improvement Fund $240,000 $210,000 $530,000 Street Improvement Funds $1,570,000 $1,200,000 $2,600,000 Total Project Cost $2,570,000 $1,845,000 $4,000,000 These financing sources are consistent with the City's draft 2015-2019 Capital Improvement Plan. Following authorization of the 2015, 2016 and 2017 Pavement Management Projects, the anticipated project schedule is as follows: Open Bids 2015 PMP February, 2015 Award Contract 2015 PMP March, 2015 Special Assessment Hearing March 2015 2015 PMP 2016 PMP 2017 PMP Begin Construction 2015 PMP Spring 2015 Project Completion 2015 PMP Fall 2015 Open Bids 2016 PMP February 2016 Award Contract 2016 PMP March 2016 Begin Construction 2016 PMP Spring 2016 Project Completion 2016 PMP Fall 2016 Open Bids for 2017 PMP February 2017 Award Contract 2017 PMP March 2017 Begin Construction 2017 PMP Spring 2017 Project Completion 2017 PMP Fall 2017 Attachments • Project Location Map (1 page) • Feasibility Report, 2015/2016/2017 Pavement Management Program, dated December 18, 2014 (53 pages) • Resolution Ordering Construction of Certain Proposed Public Improvements and Authorizing Advertisement for Bids for City Project 15-01, 2015 Pavement Management Program; City Project 16-01, 2016 Pavement Management Program; and City Project 17-01, 2017 Pavement Management Program (1 page) Recommended Action 1. Hold the Public Hearings for City Improvement Projects 15-01, 16-01 and 17-01. 2. Motion to adopt Resolution Ordering Construction of Certain Proposed Public Improvements and Authorizing Advertisement for Bids for City Project 15-01, 2015 Pavement Management Program; City Project 16-01, 2016 Pavement Management Program; and City Project 17-01, 2017 Pavement Management Program. Earl St i Q Golden Ridge ! a e��a NArea " ature o L s � Q 2(nI7 PMP y Napes st AIL General Mill Nature p Olympia St I i I Lakeview Park E2016 PMP 2015 PMP ! a ex i , , i I Plymouth A N i Print Date:8/27/2014 `t ty Of Sources: golden 2015 2016 & -Hennepin County Surveyors Office for e Property Lines(2014)&Aerial Photography(2012). valley 2017 PMP City of Golden Valley for all other layers. 0 150 300 600 Feet city O go 1 d e n W-. -.4r valley Feasibility Report 2015/2016/2017 Pavement Management Pr'ogr'am City of Golden Valley, Minnesota City Project No. 15-1/16-1/17-1 SEH No. GOLDV 125641 December 18, 2014 2015/2016/2017 Pavement Management Program Feasibility Report City of Golden Valley, Minnesota City Project No.15-1/16-1/17-1 SEH No. GOLDV 125641 December 18, 2014 1 hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. J' -. Daniel P. Erickson,PE Date: December 18,2014 Lic. No.: 46661 Reviewed by: December 18,2014 Date Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. 3535 Vadnais Center Drive Saint Paul, MN 55110-5196 651.490.2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction.................................................................................................................................1 ProjectLegal Description...........................................................................................................1 2015 PMP: .................................................................................................................................. 1 2016 PMP: .................................................................................................................................. 1 2017 PMP: ..................................................................................................................................2 ExistingConditions....................................................................................................................2 SanitarySewer............................................................................................................................2 Inflowand Infiltration............................................................................................................. 2 SewerMains............................................................................................................................ 2 SanitarySewer Services.......................................................................................................... 3 WaterMain................................................................................................................................. 3 StormWater Drainage ................................................................................................................ 3 MainStem Sub-Watershed:..................................................................................................... 3 Medicine Lake Sub-Watershed:.............................................................................................. 4 Olympia Street Alley and Lakeview Park Drainage...................................................................4 Streets.......................................................................................................................................... 5 ExistingStreet Widths............................................................................................................. 5 PavementSections .................................................................................................................. 6 SubgradeConditions............................................................................................................... 6 EnvironmentalConcerns........................................................................................................ 7 ConcreteCurb and Gutter...................................................................................................... 7 PedestrianFacilities............................................................................................................... 7 ProposedImprovements............................................................................................................8 PublicParticipation................................................................................................................ 8 SanitarySewer and Water Main................................................................................................. 8 Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation................................................................................................ 8 Sanitary Sewer Service Rehabilitation.................................................................................... 9 WaterMain Rehabilitation ..................................................................................................... 9 StormWater Management........................................................................................................ 10 Water Quality Measures—Lakeview Park........................................................................... 10 Additional Water Quality Measures..................................................................................... 11 Streets........................................................................................................................................ 11 StreetWidths......................................................................................................................... 11 SubgradeCorrections........................................................................................................... 12 ConcreteCurb and Gutter.................................................................................................... 13 Intersection Improvements........................................................................................................ 13 PedestrianFacilities.................................................................................................................. 13 StreetLighting .......................................................................................................................... 14 Treeand Landscape Impacts..................................................................................................... 14 Driveway Reconstruction Program........................................................................................... 14 Estimated Costs and Project Financing.................................................................................15 EstimatedProject Costs............................................................................................................ 15 i Sewerand Water Costs......................................................................................................... 15 StormDrainage Costs........................................................................................................... 15 Street Reconstruction Costs.................................................................................................. 16 TotalProject Costs............................................................................................................... 16 ProposedProject Financing...................................................................................................... 17 SpecialAssessments.............................................................................................................. 17 Sewer and Water Reserve Fund............................................................................................ 18 Storm Sewer Improvement Fund........................................................................................... 18 StreetImprovement Funds.................................................................................................... 18 FinancingSummary.............................................................................................................. 18 Summary and Recommendations...........................................................................................19 UtilityImprovements................................................................................................................ 19 Storm Drainage Improvements................................................................................................. 19 StreetImprovements.................................................................................................................20 Recommendations....................................................................................................................20 Exhibit 1 Location Map Exhibit 2A - 2K 2015/2016/2017 PMP Proposed Project Layouts Exhibit 3 Existing Street Widths Exhibit 4 Proposed Street Widths Exhibit 5 Subcut Depths / Soil Borings Exhibit 6 Pedestrian Routes Exhibit 7 Sanitary Sewer Defects Appendix A - Summary of Residential Comments Appendix B —Assessment Roll Appendix C —Tree and Shrub Impacts ii Introduction At its July 16, 2013 meeting, the Golden Valley City Council authorized preparation of a feasibility report for the rehabilitation of streets for the 2015 Pavement Management Program (PMP). The proposed project includes rehabilitation of approximately 2.22 miles of residential streets within the same neighborhood. During the preliminary design of the project, it was determined that the existing sanitary sewer and water mains were in extremely poor condition. The replacement and rehabilitation costs for these systems far exceeded the utility budget for the project. Based upon this analysis, the City council authorized splitting the project into three smaller projects in order to work within established budgets. Based upon the utility budget constraints, the project was split into three phases, to be constructed in 2015, 2016, and 2017. Streets in the 2015 and 2016 PMP area are generally bounded by Mendelssohn Avenue on the west, the General Mills James Ford Bell Research Facility on the east, Olympia Street on the north, and Plymouth Avenue on the South. A portion of Olympia Street and all of Flag Avenue North is also included in the 2015 project. The 2017 PMP area is bound by Mendelssohn Avenue on the west, General Mills Research Nature Area on the east, Earl Street on the North, and Lakeview Park on the south. The proposed projects are shown on Exhibit 1: Project Location Map. This feasibility report addresses the 2015, 2016, and 2017 construction years and will discuss the existing conditions of the streets, sanitary sewer, water mains, and storm sewer within the project area. In addition, the report will discuss the proposed project design, estimated project costs, and the proposed financing, including a preliminary special assessment roll. Proiect Legal Description The proposed project includes: 2015 PMP: All properties in the SW% of Section 30, Township 118, Range 21; within the City of Golden Valley, Hennepin County, Minnesota, that are adjacent to the following streets.- Gettysburg treets:Gettysburg Avenue North from Plymouth Avenue North to Olympia Street • Flag Avenue North from cul-de-sac to Olympia Street • Olympia Street from Gettysburg Avenue North to Flag Avenue North • Winsdale Street form Hillsboro Avenue North to Gettysburg Avenue North • Flag Avenue North from Olympia Street to Naper Street 2016 PMP: All properties in the SW% of Section 30, Township 118, Range 21; within the City of Golden Valley, Hennepin County, Minnesota, that are adjacent to the following streets.- Independence treets:Independence Avenue North from Cul-de-sac to Olympia Street • Hillsboro Avenue North from Plymouth Avenue North to Winsdale Street • Winsdale Street form Mendelssohn Avenue North to Hillsboro Avenue North 1 2017 PMP: All properties in the SW% of Section 30, Township 118, Range 21; within the City of Golden Valley, Hennepin County, Minnesota, that are adjacent to the following streets.- Independence treets:Independence Avenue North from Olympia Street to Earl Street • Hillsboro Avenue North from Olympia Street to Naper Street • Gettysberg Avenue from Olympia Street to Naper Street • Wheeler Boulevard from cul-de-sac to Earl Street • Naper Street from Mendelssohn Avenue North to Flag Avenue North • Olympia Street from Mendelssohn Avenue to Gettysburg Avenue North. Existing Conditions Sanitary Sewer Inflow and Infiltration The Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) provides wastewater treatment and interceptor collection services for the Twin Cities metropolitan area. The MCES has undertaken a major effort to eliminate excess peak flows in its system that exceeds the capacity of the collection and treatment facilities. These excess flows can and do result in overflows of raw sewage into the Mississippi River. Inflow and Infiltration (1/1) is defined as clear water that is either directly discharged (inflow) or indirectly discharged (infiltration) into the sanitary sewer system. Among the most common sources are improperly connected sump pumps or foundation drains discharging into the sanitary sewer and the infiltration of ground water through defects in sanitary sewer mains, services, and manholes. The City of Golden Valley is one of approximately 46 cities that have been notified by the MCES that there are excess peak sanitary sewer flows being generated by their community. The peak flows in Golden Valley typically follow heavy rainfall events, indicating that improper connections to the sewer system may be present, and those sewers in low areas may be allowing ground water and surface water into the system through cracked pipes, leaking manholes, and substandard castings. Sewer Mains The existing sanitary sewer system within the project area is comprised of local lateral sewers that were constructed in the late 1950's and 1960's when sanitary sewer was first available in the City. These lateral sanitary sewer mains are constructed with eight-inch diameter cast iron and nine-inch diameter clay pipes in most areas of the project except for Naper Street (Gettysberg Avenue North to Flag Avenue North), which was constructed in 2008. A closed circuit television inspection was performed on all the City's sanitary sewer mains within the project area as part of the preliminary project design. This inspection was intended to locate the extent and severity of the defects to the 2 sanitary sewer system to determine if repairs are needed as part of the street reconstruction project. The television inspection has identified distresses within the City system that are consistent with the age and pipe material. These defects include mineral deposits, cracked pipe, root intrusion, noticeable infiltration, and offset joints. The extent of these defects is significantly greater than normally encountered in residential street reconstruction projects. Based upon these CCTV results, the sanitary sewer mains throughout the entire project area will require structural lining as discussed in the "Proposed Improvements" section of this report. The existing sanitary sewer defects are illustrated on Exhibit 7. Sanitary Sewer Services As part of its 1/1 Reduction Program, the City is offering the residents within this project area an opportunity to have a Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) inspection performed on the sanitary sewer service to their home. The property owners are not being charged for this voluntary inspection, which is identical to the Point of Sale Inspections required by City Code. The intent of this inspection is to identify 1/1 issues present in the private sanitary sewer services and allow property owners to make informed decisions regarding rehabilitation of the service lines, including voluntary participation in the repair program offered as part of the PMP project. This sewer service repair program will be discussed in more detail later in this report. Water Main The majority of the existing water main system within the project area consists of lateral mains that were installed during the early 1960s. The majority of the mains in the project area are six-inch diameter cast iron pipe, except for along Independence Avenue North, which has twelve-inch diameter pipe. These mains are typically within the existing City owned street rights-of-way. A review of water main maintenance records within the project area indicates a higher than normal history of breaks. In addition, leaky, inoperable gate valves have been discovered throughout the project area. Storm Water Drainage The entire 2015 to 2017 PMP project area is part of the Basset Creek Watershed. The majority of the project area is within the Medicine Lake sub-watershed, except for the south and east portions, which falls within the Bassett Creek Main Stem sub-watershed. The following is a brief discussion of the existing storm water facilities within the project area. Main Stem Sub-Watershed: Storm water runoff within the Main Stem Sub-Watershed portion of the project area flows to the south towards Plymouth Avenue in existing lateral storm sewers. These storm sewers drain into an existing City trunk storm sewer which eventually discharges into Basset Creek. 3 The portion of the project area within this sub-watershed has a fairly complete existing storm sewer system. Medicine Lake Sub-Watershed: Storm water runoff from the majority of the project area flows into the existing storm sewer system and discharges into an existing trunk storm sewer within Olympia Street. This storm sewer flows west under Trunk Highway 169 into the City of Plymouth and into Medicine Lake. Because the low area in the project, Lakeview Park, is approximately eight feet above the normal water level of Medicine Lake, the Olympia Street trunk storm sewer was constructed at a flat grade with a large diameter pipe in order to provide gravity drainage for this portion of the City. Olympia Street Alley and Lakeview Park Drainage The physical characteristics of the trunk storm sewer within Olympia Street result in conditions where there is inadequate capacity following heavy rainfalls. These capacity issues result in frequent backflow out of the storm sewer into Lakeview Park, causing standing water and saturated soils for much of the year when there is average precipitation. City staff has been aware of localized flooding issues in an alley north of Olympia Street between Mendelssohn and Independence Avenues. During the neighborhood open houses for the proposed projects, a resident adjacent to this alley provided staff with additional information regarding this flooding, including the extent of property damage that has resulted from the flooding. The flooding in this alley typically occurs due to the a lack of capacity in the Olympia Street trunk storm sewer discussed above and from the elevations of the adjacent homes that were constructed. The physical characteristics and capacity of the Olympia Street storm sewer were studied prior to the PMP during the preparation of a feasibility report for a water quality pond within Lakeview Park. The proposed pond, which was intended to improve the water quality within Medicine Lake, would have included a pond basin in the northern portion of the park that is most prone to poor drainage and flooding. The pond feasibility report was prepared by the City on behalf of the Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission (BCWMC) assuming construction would coincide with the PMP project. The feasibility report for the proposed Lakeview Park Pond also investigated potential remedies to the storm sewer capacity issues. Among the options investigated was the installation of a new storm sewer to Medicine Lake, or reconstruction of the existing pipe to provide capacity. These alternatives were deemed not feasible due to the high construction costs. The inability to provide adequate downstream storm sewer capacity, along with soil stability issues behind the homes on the eastern boundary of Lakeview Park, resulted in cancellation of the proposed Lakeview Park Pond project. Following the neighborhood open house meetings and the discussions with neighbors adjacent to the Olympia Street alley, a more detailed study of the flooding in this area was performed. This study used the Lakeview Park Pond study information, but was 4 focused on determining if localized solutions were available to resolve the alley flooding. This study determined that the only physical improvement that would resolve the alley flooding issues would be the construction of a large storm sewer lift station that would pump storm water runoff into the storm system in Olympia Street while preventing backflow from the pipe into the alley and backyards of the four homes adjacent to the alley. This lift station would need large pumps and a backup diesel generator, resulting in high construction costs. These estimated construction costs far exceeded the estimated flood related damages and the estimated costs to acquire the flood prone homes and remove them. As a result of the Lakeview Park Pond study, and the Olympia Alley drainage study, it was determined that the flood prone homes adjacent to the alley could not be removed from the risk of flooding. Staff met with the affected property owners to discuss this issue following completion of the study. Staff also indicated that the City would pursue state and federal funds to acquire their flood prone homes in order to address the flood related damages they have experienced. Staff is currently discussing this issue with the proper agencies and will discuss potential acquisition with the property owners as appropriate. Streets The streets within the proposed project area are local streets that were originally constructed as development occurred. The original dates of construction throughout the project area generally occurred throughout the 1950's and 1960's. Existing Street Widths In the 2015 PMP area, typical street widths and cul-de-sac diameters are as follows: - 29 feet: All streets in the 2015 PMP. - 70 feet: Half cul-de-sac diameter on the south end of Flag Avenue. In the 2016 PMP area, typical street widths and cul-de-sac diameters are as follows: - 29 feet: All streets in the 2016 PMP. - 70 feet: Cul-de-sac diameter on the south end of Independence. In the 2017 PMP area, typical street widths and cul-de-sac diameters are as follows: - 29 feet: All streets except for the west end of Naper Street, Wheeler Boulevard, and the alleys. - 25 feet: Wheeler Boulevard. - 24 feet: Naper Street west of Independence Avenue North. - 16 feet: The alley located north of Naper Street has a width of 16 feet. - 10 feet: The alley between Earl Street and Wheeler Boulevard. - 65 feet: Cul-de-sac diameter on the south end of Wheeler Boulevard. 5 Street widths are typically measured from gutter flow line to gutter flow line. If no curb exists, street widths are measured from edge of pavement to edge of pavement. Street widths can vary depending upon the location on any given roadway. Please see Exhibit 3: Existing Street Widths for a reporting of the typical street width for a specific street. Pavement Sections All the streets within the proposed project area have existing asphalt pavement. The existing pavement depths vary and are shown in the chart below. Pavement Depth Typical Pavement Project Area Range (inches) Depth (inches) 2015 3.00 to 7.50 4.0 2016 3.00 to 7.50 4.0 2017 2.25 to 6.50 4.0 Properly constructed asphalt streets are built with a base course of fill beneath the pavement usually made up of granular (gravel) material. This base course layer is considered to be part of the pavement section. The soil borings taken in this project area show that the majority of the base course fill consists of silty sand and sand with silt with varying gravel content. Many of the soil boring locations lacked the gravel content that is required to meet today's requirements for pavement base. Silt and clay are evident in the base course in many of the borings. The presence of these materials makes the granular base susceptible to deflections due to moisture and frost. Consequently the base tends to be unstable under traffic loads when wet, especially during freeze/thaw conditions. The pavement distresses present within the project area are consistent with the age of the streets. Common pavement distresses include longitudinal and transverse cracking, alligator cracking, edge cracking, and patching. Patching is frequently used to cover severe distresses such as alligator cracking, and is therefore indicative of poor pavement quality. Subprade Conditions As part of the preliminary design for the proposed project, a series of 27 soil borings were taken to determine the suitability of the existing subgrade materials for street construction. These soil borings were also the source of the pavement and base thickness information provided above. The soil borings indicate that the subgrade soils (native soils beneath the base or sub base) in the project area vary and consist of glacial till and fill soils containing clayey sand and/or sandy lean clay soils, many of which are wet and/or soft. These materials are prone to pumping, rutting, and deflection when wet, 6 particularly during freeze/thaw cycles and during construction, resulting in premature pavement failure. Swamp deposits were encountered at isolated locations in the project area, specifically along the north and south sides of Lakeview Park. On the north side, at the intersection of Olympia Street and Hillsboro Avenue North. On the south side, on a portion of Winsdale Street. Environmental Concerns During the excavation phase of past PMP projects there have been several encounters of buried debris, including rubble such as brick, concrete, asphalt and timbers. These materials have typically been encountered in low areas that were filled as development occurred. Therefore, contract and specifications for all PMP projects now include a contingency plan that addresses buried debris should it be unexpectedly encountered during construction. Concrete Curb and Gutter The majority of the project area has existing concrete curb and gutter, except for a few locations where rolled bituminous curb exists. The bituminous curb was typically constructed by placing extra asphalt off the edge of the paver when the streets were originally built. In the 2015 PMP area, all streets have existing concrete curb and gutter except for Gettysburg Avenue North and the alleys, which have bituminous curb. In the 2016 PMP area, all streets have existing concrete curb and gutter except for Independence Avenue North south of Winsdale Street to cul-de-sac, which has bituminous curb. In the 2017 PMP area, all streets have existing concrete curb and gutter except Wheeler Boulevard, Naper Street from Mendelssohn Avenue North to Independence Avenue North, Independence Avenue North from Naper Street to Earl Street, and the Alley areas, which have bituminous curb. Pedestrian Facilities A few sidewalks and/or trails exist within the proposed project area. There is an existing trail that follows north and south through Lakeview Park from Naper Street to Olympia Street and an existing sidewalk along the north side of Naper Street from Gettysburg Court to Flag Avenue. As part of the City's Comprehensive Plan, the pedestrian and trails map identifies a future "to be determined" pedestrian route through the project area. The City evaluated route options including impacts to yards, trees, and driveways. The high cost resulting from substantial impact to properties outweighed the benefit received. As a result, off- road pedestrian facilities will not be expanded throughout the project area. 7 Street Lighting Street lighting exists in various areas around the project area. These street lights are mounted on Xcel Energy poles. There are no existing decorative street lights in the project area. Proposed Improvements This portion of the feasibility report will focus on the proposed design of the project. The estimated project costs and project financing will be discussed later in this report. Public Participation As part of the preliminary design process for the 2015/2016/2017 Pavement Management Program, two sets of project open houses were held. The first open house was held in April 2014 and the second was held in September 2014. The open houses provided residents with project information and provided a forum for the property owners to express concerns and ask questions regarding the proposed project. Residents were able to view the preliminary project design, including anticipated impacts to landscaping, trees, and driveways. Information regarding the Driveway Reconstruction Program and the Inflow and Infiltration Sewer Service Inspection Program was also available at these meetings. Residents who were not able to attend the April 2014 open houses were mailed all the information that was distributed at the meetings. It should be noted that open house attendance, and all written comments received at or following the open house meetings, is summarized in Appendix A.- Summary :Summary of Resident Comments. These written comments are an important tool for staff to identify issues that need to be addressed as part of the project design. The proposed improvements discussed in this portion of the feasibility report are shown on Exhibits 2A through 2K: Proposed Project Layouts. Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation As discussed earlier in this report, a television inspection of the existing sanitary sewer system was performed during the preliminary design portion of this project. Based upon the results of this survey, it has been determined that 100 percent of the sanitary sewer mains within the project are in need of repair. The nature of the defects present, primarily cracked pipes and root intrusion, indicates that all of the sanitary mains can be rehabilitated by structural lining. Sanitary sewer lining will be effective in repairing the defects in most of the sewer mains, and will be effective in addressing the infiltration issues within the City's system. 8 The existing sanitary sewer defects are illustrated on Exhibit 7. The proposed sanitary sewer improvements are illustrated on Exhibits 2A through 2K: Proposed Project Layouts. In addition to lining the sanitary sewer mains, this project will incorporate other measures to reduce the amount of Inflow and Infiltration being introduced into the City's sewer main system. These 1/1 reduction efforts include the replacement of all sanitary sewer manhole castings and covers; the reconstruction of many sanitary sewer manholes, and the sealing of sanitary sewer manholes. These measures have been implemented in past PMP projects, and are consistent with the City's efforts to address all sources of 1/I. Sanitary Sewer Service Rehabilitation As previously mentioned, residents in the project area have been given the opportunity to voluntarily have their sanitary sewer service inspected as part of this project and the City's ongoing Inflow and Infiltration (1/1) Reduction Program. The intent of this voluntary inspection, which is funded by the City's water and sewer fund, is to identify sources of 1/1 from the privately owned sanitary sewer services. It also intended to let the property owners know what sewer service repairs are needed in order to become compliant with City Code. Each of the property owners can use the information provided in the inspection to plan for future sewer service repairs, including participation in the sewer service repair program offered as part of the proposed project. Sewer service inspections started in the fall of 2014 for residents involved with the 2015 portion of the project. Residents involved with the 2016 and 2017 portion of the project will be given the opportunity to have their sanitary sewer services inspected starting in the fall prior to the year planned for construction. Each property owner, including those who did not participate in the voluntary inspection program, will be given the opportunity to have repairs performed on their sanitary sewer service. These repairs will be performed in conjunction with this project, but will be completed under a separate contract from the public improvements. Homeowners will be able to have their sewer services lined, or removed and replaced, as part of this program. Water Main Rehabilitation Based upon water system maintenance records, it has been determined portions of the existing 12-inch and 6-inch diameter cast iron water main located in the project area must be replaced as part of this project. A temporary water supply system will be required to provide water to the homes during water main replacement. The proposed water main replacement is shown on Exhibits 2A through 2K: Proposed Project Layouts. In addition to water main replacement, localized repair, replacement, and the installation of additional gate valves, hydrants and water main fittings will be 9 performed throughout the project area. Hydrants not being replaced will be sandblasted and painted. Storm Water Management The entire project area is part of the Basset Creek Watershed. The majority of the project area falls within the Medicine Lake drainage district except for the south and east portions, which fall within the Bassett Creek drainage district. Therefore, the construction project will be designed in accordance with the Basset Creek Water Management Commission (BCWMC) Requirements for Improvements and Development Proposals. This includes the implementation of storm water best management practices (BMPs) as part of the project design and during construction. The majority of the proposed storm sewer improvements for the project area are modifications, extensions, and/or replacements of the existing storm sewer system to help facilitate drainage of streets, rights-of-way and adjacent properties to the extent feasible. The proposed storm drainage improvements are shown on Exhibits 2A through 2K.- Proposed K:Proposed Project Layouts. As with past PMP projects, a sump discharge drainage system is proposed within the project area as needed. This sump discharge drainage system consists of a piping system behind the curb and a service stub for potential connection of private sump pump discharges. The sump discharge drainage system is proposed for locations where a significant number of sump pumps are present, and provides an alternative to discharging sump pumps above ground or into the sanitary sewer. Water Quality Measures— Lakeview Park In 2004, the City of Golden Valley completed a Feasibility Report for Lakeview Park as part of the Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission (BCWMC). The study identified water quality benefits, potential to reduce flooding throughout the park, removal and replacement of the sanitary sewer through the park, and the overall feasibility of constructing a storm water pond within the park. Due to the lack of funding, the project did not proceed. In 2013, the Lakeview Park storm water pond was brought back for review. The goal of the project was to design and develop construction documents for a storm water pond, designed to meet BCWMC Level I standards for the contributing drainage area. Many constraints to the site and other factors affecting the overall project cost that were not identified during the original drainage study completed in 2004 surfaced. These factors include prolonged park flooding on the north side of the park, poor soil conditions, high groundwater levels, undersized and shallow storm sewer trunk line, and limited live storage if a pond was constructed due to the flooding potential of the adjacent homes. The Lakeview Park storm water pond will not be constructed due to the high cost and risks involved with potential flooding of adjacent homes and slope stability issues that would be likely if a pond were to be excavated. Long term goals of the City include acquiring the adjacent homes in order to eliminate the flooding risks 10 involved with improving the park with a water quality feature. In the short term, the City will be restoring the northeast corner of Lakeview Park with native plantings to aesthetically improve the naturally low lying area that often floods. Additional Water Quality Measures While rain gardens or infiltration basins are not feasible due to the typical clayey soils that prevent water infiltration into the subsurface, rain gardens designed as filtration basins may be feasible. The City will provide technical assistance to individual homeowners if they desire to create "rain garden" filtration basins on their property. Storm sewer sump manholes with Saint Anthony Falls Laboratory (SAFL) Baffles (or equal) will be installed throughout the project area. SAFL Baffles provide pre- treatment to storm water entering the sump manholes by filtering out sediment as it enters the manhole. The sump manholes allow the larger debris and sediment that is filtered from the storm water by the SAFL Baffle to settle out in the sump, where it is cleaned out on a regularly scheduled basis as part of the City's maintenance program. The minimization of impervious surfaces such as pavement, which generate higher volumes of storm water runoff than vegetated pervious surfaces, is a goal of PMP design. Existing street impervious areas, post construction impervious areas, and the amount of decrease in impervious area for the 2015 PMP, 2016 PMP, and 2017 PMP are shown below. Post Existing Street Construction Decrease of % Reduction Impervious Area Impervious Area Impervious of Impervious PMP (acres) (acres) Area (acres) Area 2015 2.70 2.43 0.27 10.0% 2016 2.00 1.83 0.17 8.5% 2017 3.62 3.37 0.25 6.9% Streets The City of Golden Valley Pavement Management Program stresses the use of proper pavement rehabilitation measures for each street. After reviewing the streets within the project area, it has been determined that reconstruction to City standards is the appropriate rehabilitation measure. This section of the report will discuss proposed rehabilitation measures being recommended, as well as the structural and geometric concerns encountered during preliminary design. Street Widths The Pavement Management Policy strives to maintain or reduce existing street widths when a roadway is reconstructed. The policy outlines exceptions to this goal for streets where high traffic volumes or unsafe traffic conditions are present that could be resolved with additional street width. This portion of the Pavement Management Policy has been adhered to in this project to the extent possible. 11 In general, street widths for this project were determined by slightly reducing the average width of the street, while also considering potential impacts. Therefore, at any specific point on a street, the proposed street width may be narrower, or wider, than the existing roadway. Generally, reducing street widths also reduces construction costs, reduces impervious runoff into the lakes and streams, reduces street maintenance costs, and promotes neighborhood traffic calming. The existing street widths are illustrated in Exhibit 3: Existing Street Widths. The proposed width of each street is shown on Exhibits 2A through 2K.- Proposed Project Layouts and on Exhibit 4: Proposed Street Widths. Sub-grade Corrections Based upon the subsurface conditions encountered within the project area, it is recommended that subgrade correction occur beneath each street with structurally substandard subgrade materials. Subgrade correction is performed by removing soft, moisture-susceptible soils that are structurally unsuitable, and backfilling with clean (minimal silt) granular material such as sand or gravel. The subgrade correction planned for this project includes subcutting and replacing the excavated soils with up to four feet of sand and/or light weight aggregate and the City's standard bituminous and gravel street section. The final depth of subcuts to be constructed will be determined for each street in the field based upon actual soil conditions encountered. Refer to Exhibit 5: Subcut Depths/Soil Borings for an illustration of the proposed subcut areas and depths. The use of geotextile fabrics for additional subgrade stabilization is anticipated in various locations within the project area as identified in Exhibit 5: Subcut Depths/Soil Borings. Geotextile fabrics are typically in areas where silty subgrade soils have been identified. The actual need for geotextile fabrics will be determined during construction based upon materials encountered in the field. As previously discussed there are areas within the project that contain underlying swamp deposits and organic soils. Standard subgrade excavation and backfilling with granular materials is not feasible in these areas due to the high potential of long term street settlements. Therefore, the use of lightweight aggregate is proposed in these areas. The lightweight aggregate has a lower unit weight than the granular soils typically used, which reduces the risk of settlement of the new street, curb and gutter, and utilities. The locations within the project area where the use of lightweight aggregate is proposed is as follows- - Olympia Street: approximately 75 feet east of Independence Avenue North to approximately 75 feet west of Gettysberg Avenue North. - Hillsboro Avenue North: Olympia Street to approximately 200 feet to the north. - Winsdale Street: Hillsboro Avenue North to Gettysberg Avenue North. 12 Concrete Curb and Gutter The installation of concrete curb and gutter is required by the City because of its engineering and maintenance advantages. Curb and gutter provides pavement edge support and protection, facilitates roadway drainage, and eliminates the need for ditches. Given the practicality of curb and gutter and its usefulness, the City's standard practice is to install concrete curb and gutter on all streets in the project area. The standard type of concrete curb and gutter on Golden Valley streets includes a 6-inch high barrier curb and an 18-inch wide gutter (6618 curb and gutter). Intersection Improvements There are intersections in the project area that have wide pavement areas, which creates poor sight lines and can encourage high traffic speeds. Upon review, these intersections needed minor modifications to improve safety and reduce impervious pavement surfaces. These improvements included reducing intersection radii and formalizing the intersections with curb and gutter. The extent of these modifications was not significant enough to warrant neighborhood participation. One specific intersection improvement is the realignment of Winsdale Street at Mendelssohn Avenue North. This intersection is proposed to provide a more perpendicular alignment and better site lines for vehicles along Mendelssohn Avenue North. In addition, Mendelssohn Avenue North at Winsdale Street will be narrowed to calm traffic near the intersection and adjacent driveways. The recommended change to this intersection is illustrated on Exhibit 2H: Proposed Project Layouts. Pedestrian Facilities The City of Golden Valley Sidewalk and Trail Plan was reviewed within the project area to determine if trails or sidewalks are planned for future installation. The sidewalk and trail plan does identify a future pedestrian route through the project area, connecting to the Golden Ridge and General Mills Nature Area trail, with the specific routes to be determined. Due to narrow existing 50 foot wide street right-of-way and the proximity of mature trees to the roadway surface, significant impacts to trees and landscaping would result if an off street pedestrian route were to be constructed through the project area. As a result, a "Share the Road" pedestrian route is proposed, which will allow pedestrian flow through the project area and reduce adverse impacts to adjacent properties. The Share the Road pedestrian route will be from north to south, Gettysberg Avenue North from Naper Street to Olympia Street, Olympia Street from Gettysberg Avenue North to Hillsboro Avenue North (Lakeview Park), and Hillsboro Avenue North (Lakeview Park) from Winsdale Street to Plymouth Avenue. The streets designated as pedestrian routes will be slightly wider than other streets in the project area. Pedestrian routes will be identified with signs. The proposed pedestrian route through the project area is illustrated on Exhibit 6: Proposed pedestrian routes. 13 The existing bituminous trail in Lakeview Park is proposed for removal and replacement with a new 8 ft wide trail including pedestrian ramp installation at Olympia Street and Winsdale Street. All pedestrian ramps will be reconstructed in accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Street Lighting Street lighting exists in various areas around the project area. These street lights are mounted on Xcel Energy poles and will remain in place during and after project completion. There are no existing decorative street lights in the project area. Tree and Landscape Impacts The proposed project outlined in this feasibility report includes minimizing impacts to landscaping, trees and shrubs as a major design consideration. As a result, the impacts have been minimized to the extent possible. The City Forester reviewed the proposed project to determine the extent of the construction impacts and potential indirect impacts to trees. This review is included as Appendix B of this report. The City Forester's review also outlines steps to be taken during construction to limit unanticipated impacts. The tree and shrub replacement program is also discussed in this review. As noted in Appendix B, the City Forester has estimated the approximate amount of trees and shrubs likely to be removed as part of the street and utility construction. The estimated amount of impacted trees and shrubs is as follows: - 2015 PMP: Approximately 4 trees and 15 shrubs - 2016 PMP: Approximately 7 trees and 38 shrubs - 2017 PMP: Approximately 9 trees and 47 shrubs The City's policy for unavoidable tree and shrub loss during PMP projects is also discussed in Appendix B. The extent of the potential tree impacts due to the reconstruction of sanitary sewer and water services cannot be quantified at this time. Because maintenance of sanitary sewer services is the responsibility of the individual homeowners, the removal and replacement of trees and shrubs due to sewer service repairs will also be the homeowners' responsibility. Any tree removals required for sewer service repairs will be included in the assessable costs, but replacement trees or shrubs will be the responsibility of the property owner. The potential impacts to trees, shrubs and landscaping is one of the primary reasons that lining of sanitary sewer services is the preferred method of rehabilitation. Driveway Reconstruction Program As with past PMP projects, homeowners within the project area whose driveways are impacted by street reconstruction will be given the opportunity to have their driveway replaced as part of the project, at contract unit prices. As part of this program, residents have the option of having the driveway reconstruction costs assessed against their property for a period of 10 years. 14 It should be noted that the City may reject homeowner participation in the driveway replacement program in situations where the reconstruction is excessively complicated or additional liability is incurred by the City during the reconstruction of the driveway. This type of construction includes pavement removal or installation against the base of retaining walls, foundation or basement walls or very flat or steep grades. Estimated Costs and Project Financing Estimated Project Costs The estimated costs for the improvements outlined in this report are separated by the type of work and funding sources. These categories include utility work, storm drainage improvements, and street reconstruction costs. The estimated project costs include construction costs, construction contingencies of 10%, and an estimated 25 percent of the construction costs as indirect costs. These indirect costs typically include project design, surveying, construction administration, and legal costs. Discussion on the financing and funding sources for the proposed improvements is included in the next section of this report. Sewer and Water Costs The estimated sewer and water costs include all water main replacement, sanitary sewer repairs, and maintenance as outlined within this report. 2015 PMP: Estimated Construction Costs = $ 608,000 Estimated 25% Indirect Costs = 152,000 Estimated Sewer and Water Total = $ 760,000 2016 PMP: Estimated Construction Costs = $ 348,000 Estimated 25% Indirect Costs = $ 87,000 Estimated Sewer and Water Total = $ 435,000 2017 PMP: Estimated Construction Costs = $ 696,000 Estimated 25% Indirect Costs = $ 174,000 Estimated Sewer and Water Total = $ 870,000 Storm Drainage Costs The estimated storm drainage costs include all storm sewer installation, water quality measures, and erosion control. 2015 PMP: Estimated Construction Costs = $ 192,000 Estimated 25% Indirect Costs = $ 48,000 Estimated Storm Drainage Total = $ 240,000 15 2016 PMP: Estimated Construction Costs = $ 168,000 Estimated 25% Indirect Costs = $ 42,000 Estimated Storm Drainage Total = $ 210,000 2017 PMP: Estimated Construction Costs = $ 424,000 Estimated 25% Indirect Costs = $ 106,000 Estimated Storm Drainage Total = $ 530,000 Street Reconstruction Costs The estimated street reconstruction costs include all subgrade correction, pavement, curb and gutter, vegetation restoration, and landscaping costs. These costs also include removal and replacement of decorative street lights within the project area. In addition, the street reconstruction costs include quantities for an estimated 20% participation in the private driveway reconstruction program. 2015 PMP: Estimated Construction Costs = $ 1,256,000 Estimated 25% Indirect Costs = $ 314,000 Estimated Street Reconstruction Total = $ 1,570,000 2016 PMP: Estimated Construction Costs = $ 960,000 Estimated 25% Indirect Costs = $ 240,000 Estimated Street Reconstruction Total = $ 1,200,000 2017 PMP: Estimated Construction Costs = $ 2,080,000 Estimated 25% Indirect Costs = $ 520,000 Estimated Street Reconstruction Total = $ 2,600,000 Total Proiect Costs 2015 PMP: Estimated Sewer and Water Costs = $ 760,000 Estimated Storm Drainage Costs = $ 240,000 Estimated Street Reconstruction Costs = $ 1,570,000 Estimated Total 2015 PMP Project Cost = $ 2,570,000 2016 PMP: Estimated Sewer and Water Costs = $ 435,000 Estimated Storm Drainage Costs = $ 210,000 Estimated Street Reconstruction Costs = $ 1,200,000 Estimated Total 2016 PMP Project Cost = $ 1,845,000 16 2017 PMP: Estimated Sewer and Water Costs = $ 870,000 Estimated Storm Drainage Costs = $ 530,000 Estimated Street Reconstruction Costs = $ 2,600,000 Estimated Total 2017 PMP Project Cost = $ 4,000,000 Proposed Project Financing The proposed financing of this project is a combination of special assessments to properties abutting the streets being improved, street improvement funds, the Sewer and Water Reserve Fund, and the Storm Water Improvement Fund. The following is a brief description of each of these funding sources and a summary of the estimated amount to be funded from each source. Special Assessments The proposed special assessments for the 2015/2016/2017 Pavement Management Projects are consistent with the City of Golden Valley Special Assessment Policy and Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. As outlined in the Special Assessment Policy, residential properties are assessed on a per-unit basis for each single family or duplex unit. Oversized lots that may potentially be subdivided into additional conforming lots are assessed one unit assessment for each potential lot. However, only one unit assessment is levied with the project; with the other assessments being deferred until the property is subdivided. Corner residential lots are assessed one-half unit for each of the lot's frontage being improved, with no more than one full unit assessed, unless the lot could be subdivided. Corner lots with County roads are assessed one full unit for the local street being reconstructed. The residential special assessment rate for 2015/2016/2017 has been established by the City Council in its annual Fee Ordinance. The residential assessment rate that has been established for this project is $6,600 per unit. The assessment rate for multi-family residential properties (greater than duplex) has been established at $79.75 per foot of street frontage and all other zonings will be assessed at a rate of$91 .73 per foot of frontage. As shown on Appendix C: Preliminary Special Assessment Roll, the following is an estimated amount summary of street reconstruction costs to be financed through special assessments. 2015 PMP = $ 493,600 2016 PMP = $ 349,800 2017 PMP = $ 615,300 17 Sewer and Water Reserve Fund The Sewer and Water Reserve Fund will be the funding source for all sanitary sewer and water main work discussed within this report. The estimated amount to be funded from this source is shown below. The Sewer and Water Reserve Fund is financed from sanitary sewer and water utility fees. 2015 PMP = $ 760,000 2016 PMP = $ 435,000 2017 PMP = $ 870,000 Storm Sewer Improvement Fund All storm drainage improvements, including lateral storm sewer extensions, drain tile, erosion control, and storm water BMPs are funded from the Storm Sewer Improvement Fund. The estimated amount to be funded from this source is shown below. The Storm Sewer Improvement Fund is financed from storm water utility fees paid by all properties in the City. 2015 PMP = $ 240,000 2016 PMP = $ 210,000 2017 PMP = $ 530,000 Street Improvement Funds All street rehabilitation costs not funded by special assessments will be funded using street improvement tax levies. These levies are used to repay bonds sold to finance the project. The estimated amount to be funded from this source is shown below. 2015 PMP = $ 1,076,400 2016 PMP = $ 850,200 2017 PMP = $ 1,984,700 Financing Summary The following is a summary of the amounts to be funded from each of the sources discussed above. 2015 PMP 2016 PMP 2017 PMP Special Assessments = $ 493,600 $ 349,800 $ 615,300 Sewer and Water Reserve Fund = $ 760,000 $ 435,000 $ 870,000 Storm Sewer Improvement Fund = $ 240,000 $ 210,000 $ 530,000 Street Improvement Funds = $ 1,076,400 $ 850,200 $ 1,984,700 Estimated Total Project Cost = $ 2,570,000 $ 1,845,000 $ 4,000,000 18 Summary and Recommendations This feasibility report for the proposed 2015/2016/2017 Pavement Management Project has been prepared in accordance with the Golden Valley City Council's authorization on July 16, 2013. The proposed improvements are part of a city-wide Pavement Management Program adopted by the City in order to provide a high-quality street system in a long-term, cost-effective manner. The Pavement Management Program also includes the replacement and rehabilitation of the existing sanitary sewer, water main, and storm sewer systems as needed with each project. This report discusses the proposed improvements to streets illustrated on Exhibit I.- Project :Project Location Map. The public improvements outlined in this report are to be constructed over three separate construction seasons under three separate contracts. The sanitary sewer service repair program will be performed in conjunction with this project, but under a separate contract. A summary of the proposed improvements is as follows: Utility Improvements The sanitary sewer work proposed for the project area consists of lining existing sanitary sewer mains to repair existing defects to the sewers as illustrated under the "Proposed Improvements" section of this report. There is an optional sanitary sewer service repair program that residents may choose to participate in to rehabilitate their privately owned sanitary sewer services. The costs of the private sanitary sewer service repairs may be specially assessed to the benefiting property and will be completed in conjunction with this project, but under a separate contract. Water main work includes portions of water main replacement along with replacement of valves, and hydrants as needed and sandblasting and painting of all existing hydrants in the project area. The estimated cost for the proposed sanitary sewer and water main work discussed within this report are split between three years, 2015 PMP, 2016 PMP, and 2017 PMP. The estimated total utility costs for each year is as follows: - 2015 PMP: $760,000 - 2016 PMP: $435,000 - 2017 PMP: $870,000. The estimated totals include construction and indirect costs. This portion of the project will be funded from the Sewer and Water Reserve Fund. Storm Drainage Improvements The storm drainage improvements proposed as part of this project consists primarily of street narrowing along with modifications, extensions, and/or replacements of the existing storm system to help provide adequate drainage on all streets within the project area. In addition, the storm drainage improvement includes a sump drainage system installed behind the curbs throughout the project areas and the installation of sump manholes with SAFL Battles and erosion control items as discussed in this report. Various catch basins 19 and storm manholes will be replaced and/or removed as needed, according to their existing condition. The estimated cost for the proposed storm drainage improvements discussed within this report are split between three years, 2015 PMP, 2016 PMP, and 2017 PMP and are as follows: - 2015 PMP: $240,000 - 2016 PMP: $210,000 - 2017 PMP: $530,000. The estimated totals include construction and indirect costs. All storm water related costs within this project are to be funded from the Storm Sewer Improvement Fund. Street Improvements The street improvements proposed as part of this project include rehabilitation of approximately 2.22 miles of local streets. The proposed street reconstruction within the project area has been designed according to City standards including the installation of concrete curb and gutter and asphalt pavement. The proposed street widths have been minimized to the extent possible to avoid and minimize impacts to trees and landscaping. The proposed improvements to all streets within this project are shown on Exhibits 2A through 2K: Proposed Project Layouts. The estimated cost for the street reconstruction discussed within this report are split between three years, 2015 PMP, 2016 PMP, and 2017 PMP and are as follows- - 2015 PMP: $1,570,000 - 2016 PMP: $1,200,000 - 2017 PMP: $2,600,000 The estimated totals include construction and indirect costs. All street rehabilitation costs not funded by special assessments will be funded using street improvement tax levies. Recommendations Public Works staff has determined that the improvements outlined in this report are feasible from an engineering perspective. These improvements are consistent with the City of Golden Valley Pavement Management Program and will benefit the community and those properties abutting the proposed improvements. The cost-effectiveness of the proposed improvements should be determined by the City Council. Staff recommends approval of City Improvement Project No. 15-1, 2015 Pavement Management, City Improvement Project No. 16-1, 2016 Pavement Management, and City Improvement Project No. 17-1, 2017 Pavement Management as discussed within this report. Staff further recommends that the City Council authorize advertising for bids to construct the 2015 project. Authorization to advertise for bids for the 2016 & 2017 projects will occur each year prior to proceeding with the project. 20 a Z 211 211 BBl cn UNIMPROVED- DULUTH ST OU gpp Allh 201 201 20! ,201 20J ,918 201 2016 V \ B8G ZO> ,201 200 ZOJ ZD1 W 201 207 `ST 0 ZOO ZOO 200 LL 200 >2D0 200 ZOO ZOO 200 ZOO 2004 ZOO Q ZOO 200 191 ZOO 1916 ZOO ZOO Z 191 191 1917 c 191 7916 19/'LI (/� 191 191 1912 /915 1912 7913> N '�b 19D 1909 190 1908 190 } 190 < 190 190 190 1904 190 190 190 Q `FQ 190 940 935 930 9250 920 9150 19D1 LL > .938 939 1B> 181 1916 17 181 1811912 >BO JBD 1B e X181 ��� d 160 JBO 1BOq ��� V w NTS JBO 180 1800 !`� 0 CL 720 172 �G 716 /71 2 Z 712 9300 7 70 1 O 700 1701 1636 934 1636 163 1636 !63 1632 163 1630 163 1632 J63 162 162 1628 162 162 1628 162 162 162 1624 162 162 � 162 1 162 1624 162 co 1620 162 1620 1621 1620 162 = 161 1617 1616 161 16J6 /6> 1616 F- 161 1613 1612 161 1613 >6J2 1613 1614 6J 160 !60 1608 160 1608 160 1612 60 16D 160 1604 160 1604 160 160 w 945 1601 1600 !60 920 J6p 160D 160 >S3 940 153 1530 9145 152 152 152.9 152 152 >S29 1526 7S2 JSZJ LA E IEW 7525 K 752J l5zo 1521 151 1517 1517Z >5> 1513 �1512 1516 751 1513 >SO 150 150 151 1 W 150 150 > Q 94 501 150 501 1SOD 1501 _ 940 141 q1 � - 1409 413 1412 1413 1409 140 qp qp >q 14 1405 140 1405 4 4 1 > a 1401 140 1401 32. 401 14 N 1325 d 325 324 32 !3 132 a 317 WO132 1321 3 321 1 o Z J 1 1317 ccc I—M3, 317 131 \ 313 — 131 13J3 31 309 131 N >3D o \ !30 305 308 � Q 1308 A 2 130 30 0� goo, 912 PLYMOUTH AVE N E o O 9303 a � 9211 N / cn PLYMOUTH AVE N 3 N � 9400 LEGEND PROJECT LOCATION 2015 PMP E = PROJECT LOCATION 2016 PMP PROJECT LOCATION 2017 PMP FILE N O. ij LOCATION MAP EXHIBIT 35305 VADNASgOCEN00E0R DR. 125641 ;oi(len s 2015/2016/2017 PAVEMENT NO. ST. PAUL, MN 5511 0-51 9 6 DATE: Valley MANAGEMENT PROGRAM SEH www.sehinc.com 10/27/14 (PMP) 1 N Aga N oId w R R i nn _ rc� a Igrc rzs ; NNo z m , voa actio 3o a v v mom zo zo zoo Rs zrcn w w d N IL LU 11 Z Q D >- zui --- � �s v�aru a W LU W + - zai W d� Q Z t Z 4. ILW � - po W _... CL Q f � 0 j Z -- Z !_ g W wiD�ow:nr co:e rioz/zz/ai 6*D'lNlr9SZN6�6W�Dm�WxD-cl!44+.°l+d-�baO-�MP�d-r�l49SZl�^Das7117J 162 ]05 1]09 1713 1 a s _ \z nzo eao INDEPENDENCE AVENUE N. + 805 1813 ,817 182 1 n 940° Wy___<•_ Jy_ GO <I T � I I I I II II I I ------------ ry 8 LEW"> G 1ea< P 9�8 F Baso EXISTING PROPOSED CURB k CUTTER PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS EXISTING SANITARY SEWER / < PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS -1 EXISTING WATER MAIN PROPOSED WATER MAIN i -«- EXISTING STORM SEWER E _ _ - - - PROPOSED DRAAIINM EWER / PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP IMPROVEMENTS INDEPENDENCEAVENUE N. 26' DENOTES PROPOSED STREET WIDTH(P_E) / BD:ND. E W GOLDEN VALLEY, MN 2015/2016/2017 PMP � + Iss>4eo-z000 aswM VADNA 5wTw on. SEH =..P.�r°� o-91B� PROPOSED PROJECT LAYOUT °"� °MT„s 2B i1321 1325 - - 412 i I , 1 - r _ I l �z HILLSBORO AVENUE N. W� w o w a , I ^ I I TAPE�O 1 I LEGEND i e ^ 1 EXISTING CURB k GUTTER szoo - PROPOSED CURB R GUTTER PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS A EXISTING SANITARY SEWER I PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS —11----- EXISTING WATER MAIN Sg —1— PROPOSED WATER MAIN ' —«— EXISTING STORM SEWER F " PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPOSED DRAINTILE ® PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP IMPROVEMENTS HILLSBOROAVENUE N. DENOTES PROPOSED STREET WIDTH(F—F) Sr TT pV•�°�'Q°m o GOLDEN VALLEY, MN 2015/2016/2017 PMP �o a SEH "° °°°°'� PROPOSED PROJECT LAYOUT onTns 2C II 4 I i I I I � az,o© Id,\.i�, I R , ,301 1517 - I 1525 t401 1105 1 {f, .� �^ � - < I .. _ ... . _-___--- 17-.< n I T7 1 ,520 ,52< 1I 00 0 b GETTYSBURG AVENUE N. s - -�--- J--'s I FO � I 1 " - �-- - --- �_� ° - LEIDEN> , I EXISTING CURB&GUTTER d Y ----- PROPOSED CURB&GUTTER i I I PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS —<— EXISTING SANITARY SEWER I PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS E EXISTING WATER MAIN I —1— PROPOSED WATER MAIN —«— EXISTING STORM SEWER E i I PROPOSED STORM SEWER �x I ---<--- PROPOSED STORM ® PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP IMPROVEMENTS GETTYSBURGAVENUE N. 26' DENOTES PROPOSED STREET WIDTH(F-F) NonNAIS N0. E 2015/2016/2017 PMP y SEH s�P�`°N� �'98 GOLDEN VALLEY,MN _7 PROPOSED PROJECT LAYOUT .A. � DnTis 2D 629 '61i ------------------- d < < <!T< < A—Te < —<- J 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 -- - ---- --— -- ----- -- _•<-- - s�� >a GETTYSBURG AVENUE N. - E M �I n m P _ r. <.___ o __. __----- ---------- __ _ i LE _ S �i�.. �'D EXISTING CURB&GUTTER PROPOSED CURB R GUTTER PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS A I =<- EXISTING SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS —I--- EXISTING WATER MAIN —1— PROPOSED WATER MAIN EXISTING STORM SEWER q _ < PROPOSED STORM SEWER R PROPOSED DRAINTILE ® PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP IMPROVEMENTS GETTYSBURGAVENUE N. DENOTES PROPOSED STREET WIDTH(F—F) HA- 5511D xis vonui ;�°o„. GOLDEN VALLEY, MN2015/2016/2017 PMP E NORSEH ^�P^"" 5198 PROPOSED PROJECT LAYOUT 2E si �+tsZ7), --- - - -- - > i 1 °> - e < —T_ > > e >L D FLAG AVENUE N. IA u s � T1 e > —< <I < R S s ___---- ---- --- EXISTING CURB&GUTTER - PROPOSED CURB k GUTTER PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS s ----- EXISTING SANITARY SEWER w PROPOSED SANITARY SEVER IMPROVEMENTS D o 3D aD - EXISTING WATER MAIN PROPOSED WATER MAIN y - ---- E%ISTING STORM SEWER ROPOSED STORM S - -- PROPOSED DRAIN nLE SEWER q ® PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP IMPROVEMENTS FLAGAVENUE N. 26' DENOTES PROPOSED STREET IMDTN(F—F) T2015/2016/2017 PMP � �, Exp GOLDEN VALLEY,MN No. y SEH u`°M� X10 5198 : PROPOSED PROJECT LAYOUT DA E Di:v,3 2F 1804 1720 v 93oo 9300 LEGEND E)OS'nNG CURB&GUTTER 7 WHEELER BOULEVARD PROPOSED CURB&GUTTER PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEM114TS E.ISING SANITARI SEWER PROPOSED SANITARI SEWER I.PROVE.INTS EASTING W TER MAIN PROPOSED WATER MAIN —II— E)OS'nNG STORM SEWER PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPOSED DRAINTILE P EDESTRIAN CURB RAMP IMPROVEMENTS 26' DENOTES PROPOSED STREET WIDTH(F-F) 2015/2016/2017 PMP EMIW DN21).0-2 S, U� DR, GOLDEN VALLEY, MN NO. SEH PROPOSED PROJECT LAYOUT /DATE 2G H, Y N 1 awk o M z ___- n __ ___ ___ _�_ ___ \ ll n WINSDALE STREET N �I 1 ti `• 1 2! s 1 I ro. , e a - _ - «- EXISTING CURB&GUTTER f PROPOSED CURB&GUTIER PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS EXISTING SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS EXISTING WATER MAIN S PROPOSED WATER MAIN EXISTING STORM SEWER 3 _ _ PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPOSED DRAINTILE PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP IMPROVEMENTS R WINSDALE STREET 26' DENOTES PROPOSED STREET WD TH(F-F) s J 2015/2016/2017 PMP "121111'� OEXHIBIT PHONE _S/BO- D �i , : (651�N- BB �tcteia� GOLDEN VALLEY,MN rro. SEH °~551 B S1� �'° " PROPOSED PROJECT LAYOUT 2H a o _ N t ' t v � — r o -6—> > i , i - � A_'i OLYMPIA STREET 60 e d � ^o i o ,.x e -- -- - --- !r - i 8 - A LECEND p EXISTING CURB de GUTTER PROPOSED CURB&CUTTER PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS - --<- EXISTING SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS EXISTING WATER MAIN PROPOSED WATER MAIN i EXISTING STORM SEWER PROPOSED STORM SEWER �.. I -----<-- PROPOSED DRAINTILE i I ® PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP IMPROVEMENTS OLYMPIA STREET 26 DENOTES PROPOSED STREET WIDTH(F-F) b FlU NO. 2015/2016/2017 PMP EXHIBff ".: (.15� 1FR� t258at S. AUL - 6 GOLDEN VALLEY,MN NO. SEH PROPOSED PROJECT LAYOUT ai2;n3 91 m P _ b i , , , f NAPER STREET N / ---- e g — g s a ; S LE(3EPQ EXISTING CURB&GUTTER , PROPOSED CURB&GUTTER o <O � PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS i —c— EXISTING SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS —I EXISTING WATER MAIN PROPOSED WATER MAIN , —«— EXISTING STORM SEWER < — PROPOSED STORM SEWER v p ------ PROPOSED DRAINTILE PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP IMPROVEMENTS NAPER STREET 26' DENOTES PROPOSED STREET WIDTH(F-F) mt E (661) 2015/2016/2017 PMP ,,,, N6 16N,�5P, GOLDEN VALLEY,MN SEH TT MNm 56„0.5,66 PROPOSED PROJECT LAYOUT H ..��P (4• e P - -- - I fi0 I awls 1 hel $QgWe7I � ,s I I S I iE ,I --- --- - ---� L HLLRBORO AVE -- -- - -1� I S V~tl I I I ?I n - F____ __ a P _ d _ g I I I I 0 1517 —TSzf _ I LEC3EN> 'p X11 � M Yf EXISTING CURB 8 GUTTER -__-___ __CTIY AVE. - - PROPOSED CURB h GUTTER co< PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS S i -171-7 ""----- EXISTING SANITARY SEWER , PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS EXISTING WATER MAIN . ---__ _..____ -__. _ _ _. I -I- PROPOSED WATER MAIN _ < EX ISTING STORM SEWER POSED STORM SEWER 1 ---<--- PROPOSED DRAINTILE ® PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP IMPROVEMENTS LAKEVIEWPARK 26' DENOTES PROPOSED STREET WID H(F-F) E E °"kF ''N'P-. GOLDEN VALLEY,MN 2015/2016/2017 PMP • NO. y -•__� '° PROPOSED PROJECT LAYOUT ,°„;i„ 2K � ., ,,. � 894 .4rc � -UNIMPROVED- 5 DUL�ST � V Z 90a ZD1 201 201 201 Z01 918 Zal j 2D16 Q ZD> Z01 ZDO 201 ZD1 201 201 H Sj ZOO ZDD ZOO 200 .200 ,200 ZDD ZOO 200 ZDD ZOO4 200 200 Zpp 191 ZDa 1916 2Da ZOO Z 191 191 79>7 C >9> 1916 1917"Lu G 197 191 1912 1915 191 1913� 190 1909 190 1908 !967. 1909 790 19a 190 1904 1.9D 190 190 g FQ 190 940 935 6 9250 92a 9150 19al LL 1 DJ 93B 934 181 1B> 1816 1T J� �T >BJ 181 7872 J 180 180 1818 �f8 �t,Q` � 1Bo 1Ba 7804 p j 180 180 1800 O 720 J7Z 71 171 " 65 DIA. Z 70 > NTS 700 1701 1636 934 1636 163 1636 163 1632 163 1630 163 1632 163 >6Z 162 16ZB 16Z u-_ 5—: 16Z 16Z 1624 162 -;e--2, 16Z 1628 162 16Z 16Z 162 >6Za 762 762D 1621 624 161 1617 1620 16Z = 1616 161 1616 J617 7616 H 761 1613 16>Z 167 1613 1612 1613 1614 67 160 160 >6p8 >6O >6aB >6a 60 160 16D 1604 160 1612 W 94 1601 1600 1604 160 160 160 920 160 1600 160 153 940 T >SZ 15Z9 '`S`� 1530 9145 152 15Z 1529 1526 1529 0 752 1521 LA EI EW 1525 15 'S2' 1520 151 17 K 1521 v 1517' 1517 Z 0 151 1513 7512 1513 1516 151 N 150 >SD 150 151 -/3Fy W lSD 150 1 Q 94 501 >SO 501 1500 1501 940 141 41 413 1412 1413 Q 3 1409 140 1409 4a 4a J J4°5 J'° "DS LL O' 46 � LEGEND (EXISTING STREET WIDTHS) 1401 1325 a '4O 25 �z 14 140 10' WIDTH (ALLEY) 377 '?Z 1321 c t3 321 >3 16' WIDTH (ALLEY) x Z 131 1317" 316 317 13 313 — 131 1313 31r p 130 3a9 /Y/_ 24+ WIDTH � 1309 308 3i ° 130 305 0 '3OB a z �■ 25 WIDTH N 130 1p '3�p, 912 29' WIDTH PLYMOUTH AVE N 35' RAD. 9303 CUL-DE-SAC DIA. x H .9000 U) PLYMOUTH AVE N a i 70' DIA. 9400 i E i a FILE NO. EXISTING STREET WIDTH PHONE: 651.490.2000 125641 "'' 2015/2016/2017 PAVEMENTEXHIBIT 3535 VADNAIS CENTER DR- golden MA NO. DAT ST. PAUL, MN 55110-5196 E valley MANAGEMENT PROGRAM SEHwww.sehinc.com 10/27/14 (PMP) 3 �• 5 � - � ,. ,.. 894 z�z -co � -UNIMPROVED- DULUTH ST ts 211 2l> 0 0 �V 900 h 201 201 2O, 2016 20J 918 20J 2°16 \ B6 ZOl 2D> 200 201 201 201 201 S� is 200 200 200 200 200 200 00 2,9,9,3Mato 200 >200 200 200 Zpp ,9, 200 1916 200 200 Z 191 —49-1-7 191 1916'11917 W T 191 191 1912 >9> 191 1913 lam' M5LL J935 938 934 >B1 181 1816 17 >B1 >B1 >Bl2 5 >e0 160 1e>e X181 D w NTS 180 180 1804 �Q- >e0 0 720 172 1-'16'L171 71 9300 :? V-7 O 700 1701 1636 934 1636 163 16'.96 J63 1632 !63 1630 163 16MI 163 162 162. 1628 162 162 162 1624 162 162 162 1628 162 C3) 1 162 1 162 1624 62 co 1620 162 1620 1621 1620 162 = 161 1617 :, 1616 161 1616 1617 1616 H 161 1613 1612 161 c 1616 1612 1613 1614 61 160 160 ` 1608 160 16'06 ,60 60 160 160 1612 Z 1604 >60� 1604 161 160 w 94 1601 '16°0 1601 920 1601 1600 160 153 940 >S3 ;;1530 9145 lS2 152 152 1529 '' 1626 752.9 !Sz LAE IEW >s2s 152 >Sz> 1521 15! 1517 PA RK 1620 1521 1517 1517 z a >5> 1513 1512 1513 . 1516 >So 150 15a,5151 W 150 150 Q gq 501 b 150 Sp> 1500 1501 N 94DJ 141 412 CD 1409 ,q0 1409 4> 1412 1413 Q 405 140 LEGEND (PROPOSED STREET WIDTHS) 10' WIDTH ALLEY (MILL / OVERLAY 1325 325 32 32 >3 13 0 s 317 132 1321 3 321 , 16 WIDTH ALLEY (MILL / OVERLAY a 313 12; 1317 3 3!7 19 24' WIDTH 1313 3> 3D9 131 3 130 1309 308 1308 wr 26' WIDTH 130 305 30 0 1300, 91� �� 28' WIDTH P�Yn�°urHAVE" CUL—DE—SAC DIA. N rn S4 9303 co 9211 °u fn i ai PLYMOUTH AVE N D d 1 � I \ 9400 E a FILE NO. PROPOSED STREET WIDTH ter,�f EXHIBIT PHONE: 651.490.2000 125641 gOlde 2015/2016/2017 PAVEMENT NO. 3535 VADNAIS CENTER DR. i ST. PAUL, MN 55110-5196 DATE: ; MANAGEMENT PROGRAM SEHwww.sehinc.com 10/27/14 (PMP) 4 -UNIMPROVED- DULUTH ST z �U ST a N R LL J C' B-a m' LLJ O NTS w � z 0' B-11 X76 2 —5 H W zLu 3 z Ld6 O AKE I WB J B-20 Q PA W, Q LL Lu B-18 a — W oLL o B-26 j LEGEND cn 4' SUBCUT W/ LIGHTWEIGHT AGG. 4' SUBCUT B-27 W 3' SUBCUT PLYMOUTH AVE N SOIL BORING a z � i = i U) PLYMOUTH AVE N E i FILE N0. SU113=DEPTHS/SOIL BORIN PHONE: 651.490.2000 125641 P livo+ 2015/2016/2017 PAVEMENT EXHIBIT 3535 VADNAIS CENTER DR. oldb, _ NO. SEH ST. PAUL. MN 55110-5196 0DATE: Valley MANAGEMENT PROGRAM 5 L! www.sehinc.com (PMP) v 5 p V 211 y BB> -UNIMPROVED- DULUTH STo� Z.>1 zJ1 0 pV 900 h .01 z01 ZD1 .01 201 9lB .O1 .016 B6 .D1 201 .00 201 .O> .O> .O1 ST .00 .00 .00 .00 ZOO 200 00 .OD 20D ZOO LL 200 ZOO .00 Zpp 191 -'aal<1816 t200 z00 Z 191 191 9 1917 c 191 J9J6 191"UJ Gti/ 191 191 1912 191 191 1913 �Jp 190 1909 190 1908 190 190 190 190 190 1904 190 190 190 Q FQ 190 940 935 930 925 9.0 915 19011Ji 938 934 181 181 >1816 17 180 180 1618 �f8 �JYz O >BD 1BD 1804 �QwNTS W 1800 !�' 0Z 9300 70 1701 1636 934 1636 163 1636 163 J6.?. 163 1630 163 163. 163 >6. 16. J62B 162 16-2.0' 16'2S >M09 16.2 162 >6z 16.4 le2,3< 1624 162 162 1 16.D 162 1620 1621 7620 162 161 1617 1616 161 1616 1617 76J6, 161 161 1613 1612 161 J6J. 1613 1614 61 160 160 1608 160 160 161. 160 160 1604 160 1604 160 160 160 W 94 1601 1600 160 9.0 16D 1600 /60 153 940 153 1530 9145 152 152 15. 1529 15,26'15.9 Js2 LA E IEW J5z5 /S.`-P/ 15.0 15.1 151 1517 P K 1517 1517 Z 151 1513 Z 151. 1513 1516 150 150 W 150 J >py-1.517 > 150 > 150 Q 94 501 Q 150 SO> 1500 JSD> a 940 141 4>. 413Z 14Jz 1413 Q 1409 140 1409 40 4 14 J4 u- LEGEND (PEDESTRIAN ROUTES) 1405 140 '401 J4D 13D> 3. ;o q ;4D EXISTING PEDESTRIAN ROUTES /325 3.5 3. 3. 13 13. 0 317 132 1321 3.1 > a 313 Z J3J7 3 317 ,3> 28' STEET- SHARE THE ROAD 1319 31 130 1309 308 309 ;3DB PEDESTRIAN ROUTES o 130 305 30 /goo, 9�2 PLYMOUTH AVE N 8' WIDE TRAIL- LAKEVIEW PARK s j = 9000 o � " PLYMOUTH AVE N a i i n d FILE No. PEDESTRIAN ROUTES ' 125641 01 ` 2015/2016/2017 PAVEMENT EXHIBIT NO. o PHONE: 651.490.2000 6 3535 VADNAIS CENTER DR. ivii ST. PAUL, MN 55110-5196 DATE: Vdl_j C MANAGEMENT PROGRAM 6 SEH www.sehinc.com 10/27/14 (PMP) MH 1731 MH 1752 MH 1757 92UU 9150- 1820 1821 9385 9345 1816 1817 1816 1817 MH 28 1812 1813 1812 1758 1 1808 1809 1808 1815 ` 0 MH 17.321804 1805 1804 �JQ 1785 795 1800 W 1800 1801 1800 O 1720 MH-1751 MH 1-760 9300 M 53150 1721 d 1716 1717 1721745 1735 MH 1713 MH 1761 1725 3149 17202 1712 1709 1715 9 D MH 1704 1705 MH 1750 1762 MH -I 917 MH 3151 28 MH 1778 1700 1701 1636 9345 1636 1637 1636 MH 2307A W-1733 1637 1632 1633 1630 1633 1632 1633 1628 1629 1628 1629 MH 1763 MH-1-749A 1624 1629 1628 1629 1624 1625 1624 1625 MH 177-7 1622 1621 1625 1624 1625 1620 1621 1620 1621 1620 1621 1616 1617 1616 1617 1616 1617 MH 2308 MH 1734' 1616 1617 1612 1613 1612 1613 1612 MH 1776 1613 1614 1613 1608 1609 1608 1609 1608 1604 1605 $ 16-041605MH 1764 1609 1612 1609 MH 1749 1604 1604 1605 9450 16011600 1601 1601 MH 1735 HM1748 MH 1765 1600 1601 MH PI2309 A ST MF1-248+7 S1532 9405 IVIH 1775 1528 1529 1532 1530 9145 1524 28 1529 1526 1529 1524 MH 2310 1520 1521 MH 16 1521 1525 1520 MH 1766 1521 1520 1521 7.3 1516 1517 1516 MH-1 774 MH 1747 15171517 1512 1513 1512 1516 1513 1513 1508 1505 1508 MH-2311 1504 1504 1533 1514 150.9 Q 9450 11501 1 1512 MH 2312 MH 1737 MH 1746 1500 1501 MF11767 MH_1773 1500 1501 94359405 1412 9000 1409 1409 1412 1413 1412 1413 T 1408 DEFECTS 1 1405 1408 1409 1408 1409 MH 2313 1404 1405 1405 0 1401 1400 1404 1405 Fracture MH_1745 1400 1401 1328 a 0 Infiltration 1 4 1401 1400 1401 z Intruding Tap MH 1738 1325 1325 1324 1325 1324 1324 MH 1768 MH-177-2 1325 Mineral Deposits 1320 1317 ( 1321 1 1320 1317 MH 2314 Obstacle MH-1744 1316 MH 1769 1316 1317 Offset Joint 1 121313 1312 1313 1316 1321 j E • Pipe Broken -MH-1 1308 1312 1309 1312 1313 Pipe Crack 1301 J 1309 1308 MH 1771 1308 Pipe sag MH 1739 MH 2620 1304 1305 21 28 RootsA \ �I 1300 1300 130 1300 9120 N MH 1742-- - MH 1770 - MH 2315 Project: OLDV SANITARY SEWER DEFECTS Exhibit 3535 VADNAIS CENTER DR. Print Date:10/27!2014 ST.PAUL,MN 55110 PHONE:(651)490-2000 Map by:aknorr FAX:(888)908-8166 Projection:Hennepin CC 2015/2016/2017 Pavement 7 TF:(B00)325-2055 source:City of Golden Valley,SEH SEH r^"fA°' inccom 1 inch = 300 feet Management Program (PMP) This map is neither a legaNy rewMed map w a survey map and is rot intended to be uced as one.Thia map is a compilation of records,information,and data gathered from various spumes Wad-this map and is to be used for reference purposes only.SEH tloes rwt warrant M.-t-M--G'eogrephic Inbrmation System(GIS)Dataused to preparedtia map are error free,and SEH does i represent Mat the GIS Data can be us ad W n ig ional,tracking,oranyother purpose raquinng—ding measurementofdistanceor diradlonor p-taion Inthe tlepktbnof geographic features.Theuserofthis map ackrawtedgea that SEH ahall rot be liable for any damage,w lch anaa out of Me user's access or pas of data provided. APPENDIX A Applicable Items 2015 PMP Open House Comment Card Retaining i Automatic Walls/ Sewer HOUSE Invisible Sprinkler Sump Landscape Service Comments NO. STREET PROPERTY OWNER(S) Phone Number Email Fence System Pump Features Problems Very poor drainage in street in front of my house.Also,I would be interested in getting bid from your contractor to grade& resod my front yard due to poor drainage and lots of standing 1300-13041 Gettysburg Ave N Kathleen Day 612.741.8180 davkthln(&.hotmail.com water/flooding after rain. Sump pump discharges in the back yard.There are two drains in back yard and the pipe between them collapsed.The north drain does not work.Was informed by neighbor City installed drains in approx.1963.There is a drain in the driveway of 1300 Hillsboro.Ground around drain is collapsing.I would like the City to investigate.Regarding assessments,our street already has curb&gutter,while other streets do not.Am I being 763.545.8543 home assessed for their curb&gutter? 1308 Hillsboro Ave N Ty Wilson 612.750.6846 cell X X I am not sure where the sump pump discharges.1)Concern about the drain on the west side,in front of 1301.1 believe it is plugged and has sunk.2)Stop signs at the corners of Gettysburg and Winsdale-there is a bus stop with many little kids.Also,it is part of the park.3)The drainage behind our 763.525.9765 or house(s)pools behind 1308 and 1309 Hillsboro and into the 1317 Gettysburg Ave N Brenda Clark 763.242.4619 cell biclark7Cvahoo.com X 1driveway of 1300. Sump pump discharges in the back yard.The drain south by X X Plymouth has sunk a bit and is always backing up or draining slowly.Sink hole by 1300 Hillsboro--there is a chance of 1320 Gettysburg Ave N Phyllis Kyrola 763.291.6734 people and cars falling in. There is a large drainage problem at the intersection of Gettysburg&Plymouth Ave.The grade also makes it difficult in winter months as it becomes an ice hill.There is absolute need for a controlled intersection(3-way stop)at Winsdale and Gettysburg.The NW corner(Lakeview Park)is the bus stop for the neighborhood.Higher traffic volumes since the addition to Gettysburg(North cul-de-sac).People get a 3-block speedway to Plymouth and back into the neighborhood.It is too dangerous,due to the high population of children.Please impose no-parking or one-side only,if the streets are going to be narrowed as planned. 1401 Gettysburg Ave N Jonathan d'Albertis 612.532.1662 onathan dalbertis.com Sump pump discharges to the north side of the house.Sanitary sewer problems are due to tree roots which are cleared every 2- 3 years.I have a fence(chain link)within 10 feet of the street.I have pets and I want to keep the fence.During the project,will we have access to our driveways/garages? 1501 Hillsboro Ave N Jane Moelter 763.593.0751 anemo 'hlarson.com X X X Two car ports(on either side of the driveway).I can't afford to lose footage to park and I need slanted curbs there.Fill in with 1514 Gettysburg Ave N Larry&Randee Melander 763.710.4627 Imelssian2lagol.com X X rock. Applicable Items 2015 PMP Open House Comment Card Retaining am Automatic Walls/ Sewer HOUSE Invisible Sprinkler Sump Landscape Service Comments NO. STREET PROPERTY OWNER(S) Phone Number Email Fence System Pump Features Problems I do not see the need to spend this money.The road is fine and 1621 Independence Ave N Ken White 612.202.9653 X appears someone has an agenda to spend. 1)How is the assessment amount calculated and determined? 2)When will a detail plan on what streets will be worked on first?3)If the project goes over budget or behind schedule,do the homeowners have to pay more?4)If additional damage to my property is a result of this project,is it safe to assume the City will pay the repair?If so,up to what amount?5)What will be the communication plan to homeowners throughout the project to know if the project is on or behind schedule? 1633 Flag Ave N Keith Oltmans 612.384.6530 koltmans&amail.com Spoke with Dan.1)Driveway is lower than street,so drainage concerns(have a mini-speed bump presently to help).Need driveway approach/apron corrected.2)Should have a storm sewer basin north of my lot to help collect water.Lots of water when it rains.3)Wheeler Blvd cul-de-sac has catch basin at NE corner of my lot that is higher than the ground,so it collects no water(thus water goes on my lot).4)Water collects on the east side of property inline with driveway.It doesn't run to basin. Lots of water is from vacated Wheeler pooling between the two intakes.5)Yard light by driveway(so there's an electric line from garage). I am interested in:the driveway program,the free 1/1 inspection,what happens to my trees(when project finalized), and since many of my drainage items are serious,I would like to hear what is decided and why. 1720 Independence Ave N Eric Johnson 612.226.3590 iohn4427C�umn.edu I have no issues or concerns with this project.My question is with my address:my house is on the corner of Earl and Independence with the driveway and front door facing Earl (nothing facing Independence).Why is my address 1821 Independence Ave N Mary Baker 612.209.2662 mtbakerl Cillive.com Independence Avenue? Concern about the 10"storm pipe on the east side of the property by the driveway.We have no record of who owns the 1300 Hillsboro Ave N Lawrence J.Johanns 612.308.5611 vtranCrDve tecinc.com X responsibility? Sump pump discharges onto driveway apron,north side (underground from house to driveway).Considering enlarging the size of buried drainpipe and adding gutter downspout 1628 Independence Ave N lKichard&Susan Fritz 763.544.7681 IL z&comcast.net X X water to sump pump drainage pipe. **See 4-page letter re:2015 PMP plus photographs that was hand-delivered to us during the Open House(copies are in both "Comment Cards"and"Correspondence"folders). 9450 Olympia Street Alan&Denise Strandlund 763.525.3188 Applicable Items 2015 PMP Open House Comment Card Ketaming am ry Automatic Walls/ Sewer HOUSE Invisible Sprinkler Sump Landscape Service Comments NO. STREET PROPERTY OWNER(S) Phone Number Email Fence System Pump Features Problems Sump pump discharges to the back of the house.We have a retaining wall/landscape features within 10 feet of street,but nothing that has to be worked around.Our back yard floods each spring and every heavy rainfall.We know this isn't part of the street reconstruction,but would appreciate any suggestions.It is a neighborhood issue for those of us on the east side of Hillsboro and west side of Gettysburg(south of the park).We also request the streets not be narrowed too much. There is a lot of pedestrian traffic in our neighborhood and no sidewalks.Narrowing the streets could present a safety hazard. 1320 Hillsboro Ave N Todd&Lisa Nesbitt 763.593.1183 X X Concern about the 10"storm pipe on the east side of the property by the driveway.We have no record of who owns the 1413 Gettysburg Ave N Elizabeth(Betsey)House 763.593.9745 betseyhouse0422namail.com X responsibility? **See Letter that was emailed to Jeff Oliver on 4/17(Copies are in both"Comment Cards"and"Correspondence"folders). This property is the lowest on the block.Water pools in detached garage,floods,and sometimes comes up to the back door.Would like a yard drain put on south edge of property.I invite you to visit the property and take a look in the spring or just after a heavy rain. 1604 Hillsboro Ave N Kevin Wellmann 612.369.2903 kevinna machtenmarketina.com 507.382.2359 or Sump pump discharges close to front step. 1609 Flag Ave N Alex Klehr&Hannah Wasko 507.340.6877 X I just moved into my home on 7/31/13.Its my understanding when we receive heavy rainfall,the storm sewer in the alley behind my house cannot keep up.The statement had been made to me that the basement flooded because the rain water entered the house from the back yard 5 years ago. 1605 Independence Ave N Brad Veltkamp 612.209.3345 Sump pump discharges on the east side into the storm sewer (on City property).During the open house a picture was brought up on the screen and I pointed out the end of the pipe. The end is exposed.The PVC pipe is buried.It was suggested that we write this down so the correct connection can be made in 2015 pavement work.The storm sewer in the street is adjacent to the one in our yard.Our home faces Winsdale and the west side(front of house)faces Hillsboro.Storm sewer is on Winsdale Street. 1412 Hillsboro Ave N Milton Hill,Gladys Williamson 763.546.1124 X Sump pump discharges to the northeast corner of the basement.I have sanitary sewer service problems(tree roots). Pine trees,fire hydrant and street sign,don't worry about the 9345 Naper Street Ginger H.Zoubek 763.544.6598 X I surrounding flowers. Applicable Items 2015 PMP Open House Comment Card e i mg an ry Automatic Walls/ Sewer HOUSE Invisible Sprinkler Sump Landscape Service Comments NO. STREET PROPERTY OWNER(S) Phone Number Email Fence System Pump Features Problems Sump pump discharges outside,to the rear of the house. Drainage concerns are that the property behind is graded to drain through my property.I seem to have some sort of sink hole approximately 25 feet from street in front. 1614 Gettysburg Ave N Greg Close 612.964.3532 X 1325 Hillsboro Ave N Dave Swaningson 763.545.3904 X? 1617 Hillsboro Ave N David Tupa 763.545.5860 X The sump pump discharges into the sanitary sewer. 1809 Independence Ave N Sherwood Gaines 612.323.4551 X I have shrubs within 10 feet of the street. We just put in a new driveway and sewer line.I am worried that my nice new expensive dirveway is going to have a patch job at the bottom,which will look terrible.A single,80-year old lives in the house and will need to be able to leave and come up the 763.544.1755 or driveway,as he is handicapped. 1616 Gettysburg Ave N Willard Ryan-POA Rick Ryan 612.840.6290 My yard has concrete curb and gutter that do not need to be repaired.I request they not be removed.The only thing wrong with them is in winter the snow plows do not plow close enough to them,so for years when the snow starts to melt, water backs up,runs down my driveway,and into the garage and over the years you have ruined my garage floor.Come look.I have spent years trying to remove the snow,but once it gets too hard to remove,this happens.I have had sump pumps out there pumping water.When snow is kept up to the curb, water driains away. 1636 Hillsboro Ave N Dave Spaude 763.546.0456 1317 Independence Ave N Richard&Nichole Olson 763.432.2970 X Sump pump discharges into the back yard. I have a large maple tree at street level with surface roots showing at or near street level.I have no objection to concrete X curb and gutters!Also,thanks for mailing the information package to me while I am out of town.Much appreciated! 1632 Gettysburg Ave N Janice E.Williams 763.545.1596 763.546.0797 The City did my main several years ago.Should still be o.k. 1600 1 Gettysburg Ave N Jerry Loscheider 612.708.0935 Preliminary Special Assessment Roll CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY APPENDIX B 2015 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM CITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT F $6,600.00 MULTI RESIDENTIAL FRONT FOOTAGE RATE= OTHER ZONINGS,LOCAL STIR $91.73 RES. DEFERRED LEVIED TOTAL PID HOUSE NO. STREET PROPERTY OWNERS FRONTAGE Notes UNITS ASSMTS ASSMTS ASSMTS 3011821330110 1313 FLAG AVE N HENNEPIN FORFEITED LAND 61.68 10,13 1 $6,600 $0.00 $6,600 3011821330106 1317 FLAG AVE N HENNEPIN FORFEITED LAND 61.68 10,13 1 $6,600 $0.00 $6,600 3011821330109 1321 FLAG AVE N HENNEPIN FORFEITED LAND 62.68 10,13 1 $6,600 $0.00 $6,600 3011821330105 1325 FLAG AVE N MICHAEL E&JULIE B WEISS 61.68 1 1 $0.00 $6,600 $6,600 3011821330104 1401 FLAG AVE N MICHAEL R PELTIER&MELISSA J BEEBE 61.68 1 1 $0.00 $6,600 $6,600 3011821330103 1405 FLAG AVE N DANIEL L MORAN 61.68 1 1 $0.00 $6,600 $6,600 3011821330102 1409 FLAG AVE N LINDA R MARCOTTE 61.68 1 1 $0.00 $6,600 $6,600 3011821330101 1413 FLAG AVE N MATTHEW&JESSICA ANDERSON 87.98 1,18 1 $0.00 $6,600 $6,600 3011821330009 1501 FLAG AVE N MICHAEL D KNISELY 87.98 1 1 $0.00 $6,600 $6,600 3011821330008 1505 FLAG AVE N MLMJR PROPERTIES&INVES LLC 62.98 1,11 1 $0.00 $6,600 $6,600 3011821330007 1509 FLAG AVE N BENJAMIN M POHLMANN 62.98 1 1 $0.00 $6,600 $6,600 3011821330006 1513 FLAG AVE N PAIGE FOYER 62.98 1 1 $0.00 $6,600 $6,600 3011821330005 1517 FLAG AVE N STEVEN G WELLENS 62.98 1 1 $0.00 $6,600 $6,600 3011821330004 1521 FLAG AVE N MYRTLE E TYRA 62.98 1 1 $0.00 $6,600 $6,600 3011821330003 1525 FLAG AVE N JOEL SWANSON 62.98 1 1 $0.00 $6,600 $6,600 3011821330002 1529 FLAG AVE N ANTONIO MANDUJANO 62.98 1 1 $0.00 $6,600 $6,600 3011821320046 1601 FLAG AVE N METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 193.57 5,9 1 $0.00 $6,600 $6,600 3011821320045 1605 FLAG AVE N RONALD A ARCHER 193.62 5 1 $0.00 $6,600 $6,600 3011821320044 1609 FLAG AVE N ALEXANDER M KLEHR&HANNAH J WASKO 61 1 1 $0.00 $6,600 $6,600 3011821320043 1613 FLAG AVE N LARRY E WAHALA 61 1,12 1 $0.00 $6,600 $6,600 3011821320042 1617 FLAG AVE N SAMEER MAINI 61 1,19 1 $0.00 $6,600 $6,600 3011821320041 1621 FLAG AVE N KRISTIN M CAYO 61 1 1 $0.00 $6,600 $6,600 3011821320040 1625 FLAG AVE N WALFRED&JEAN SALEN 61 1 1 $0.00 $6,600 $6,600 3011821320039 1629 FLAG AVE N JUDITH L DESCHNEAU 61 1 1 $0.00 $6,600 $6,600 3011821320038 1633 FLAG AVE N KEITH E OLTMANS 61 1 1 $0.00 $6,600 $6,600 3011821320037 1637 FLAG AVE N JUDITH A KANITZ 203.39 2,17 1 $0.00 $6,600 $6,600 3011821330124 1300 GETTYSBURG AVE N KATHLEEN A DAY 118.84 7 1.5 $0.00 $9,900 $9,900 3011821330089 1301 GETTYSBURG AVE N GERRY A LANTTO 122.56 3 0.5 $0.00 $3,300 $3,300 3011821330125 1308 GETTYSBURG AVE N GERALD R&MARCIA L HATLING 65 1 1 $0.00 $6,600 $6,600 3011821330088 1309 GETTYSBURG AVE N LINDA M STASKIVIGE 122.56 1,4 1 $6,600 $6,600 $13,200 3011821330115 1312 GETTYSBURG AVE N CURTIS K&SANDRA N YOUNGOUIST 61.28 1 1 $0.00 $6,600 $6,600 3011821330116 1316 GETTYSBURG AVE N NICHOLAS ELLISON&RENEE HASTINGS 61.28 1 1 $0.00 $6,600 $6,600 3011821330087 1317 GETTYSBURG AVE N BRENDA J CLARK 61.28 1 1 $0.00 $6,600 $6,600 3011821330121 1320 GETTYSBURG AVE N PHYLLIS KYROLA 61.28 1 1 $0.00 $6,600 $6,600 3011821330086 1321 GETTYSBURG AVE N CARLEEN T ESTREM 61.28 1 1 $0.00 $6,600 $6,670- 3011821330122 1324 GETTYSBURG AVE N DANIEL CISLER&LISA BAIRD 61.28 1 1 $0.00 $6,600 $6,600 3011821330085 1325 GETTYSBURG AVE N CARL J GEIB&RACHEL Z GEIB 61.28 1 1 $0.00 1 $6,600 $6,600 3011821330117 1400 GETTYSBURG AVE N JAMES A KUKLOCK 61.28 1 1 $0.00 1 $6,600 $6,600 3011821330084 1401 GETTYSBURG AVE N JONATHANlKRISTINA D'ALBERTIS 61.28 1 1 $0.00 $6,600 $6,600 3011821330118 1404 GETTYSBURG AVE N ERICK J KROEGER 61.28 1 1 $0.00 $6,600 $6,600 3011821330083 1405 GETTYSBURG AVE N JENNIFER DALLMAN 61.28 1 1 $0.00 $6,600 $6,600 3011821330119 1408 GETTYSBURG AVE N W W ELLISON&K E ELLISON 61.28 1 1 $0.00 $6,600 $6,600 3011821330082 1409 GETTYSBURG AVE N J E SMITH&D J MEYTHALER 61.28 1 1 $0.00 $6,600 $6,600 3011821330120 1412 GETTYSBURG AVE N PATRICK W SCHOTTLER&JULIE SCHOTTLER 87.58 1.20 1 $0.00 $6,600 $6,600 3011821330081 1413 GETTYSBURG AVE N ELIZABETH L HOUSE 203.12 2 1 1 $0.00 $6,600 $6,600 3011821330010 1500 GETTYSBURG AVE N BARBARA L DAIKER&ANDREAN D LYNCH 87.58 1 1 $0.00 $6,600 $6,600 3011821330011 1512 GETTYSBURG AVE N WILLIAM H7 SHARI R KENNEDY 62.58 1 1 $0.00 $6,600 $6,600 3011821330021 1513 GETTYSBURG AVE N DOUG OLZENAK 62.58 1,14 1 $0.00 $6,600 $6,600 3011821330012 1514 GETTYSBURG AVE N LARRY W MELANDER 62.58 1 1 $0.00 $6,600 $6,600 3011821330013 1516 GETTYSBURG AVE N HENRY J SCHOONOVER 125.16 1,4 1 $6,600 $6,600 $13,200 3011821330020 1517 GETTYSBURG AVE N SHAWN E&CAROL L LEER 62.58 1 1 $0.00 $6,600 $6,600 3011821330014 1520 GETTYSBURG AVE N ELIZABETH A SCHULTZ 62.58 1 1 $0.00 $6,600 $6,600 3011821330019 1521 GETTYSBURG AVE N DOROTHY ANDERSON 62.58 1 1 $0.00 $6,600 $6,600 3011821330015 1526 GETTYSBURG AVE N LEE E LANGER 125.16 1,4 1 $6,600 $6,600 $13,200 3011821330018 1529 GETTYSBURG AVE N STEVEN ELMSHAUSER 125.16 1,4 1 $6,600 $6,600 $13,200 3011821330016 1530 GETTYSBURG AVE N D J DELARIA&N M DELARIA 201.1 1 1 $0.00 $6,600 $6,600 3011821320047 1600 GETTYSBURG AVE N GERALD H LOSCHEIDER 193.57 2,5,15 1 $0.00 $6,600 $6,600 3011821330100 1412 HILLSBORO AVE N iG M WILLIAMSON&M R HILL 202.73 2,16 1 $0.00 $6,600 $6,600 3011821330022 1521 HILLSBORO AVE N ICITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY 954.73 8,10 0 $0.00 1 $39,600 $39,600 3011821330001 9145 OLYMPIA ST JANDREWT SCHIEBER 201.55 2 1 $0.00 $6,600 $6,600 3011821340004 9000 PLYMOUTH AVE N IGENERAL MILLS 1839.93 6,21 0 $84,388 $84,388 $168,777 Total Deferred Assmts= $130,588.39 Total Levied Assmts= $493,588.39 Total Assessments= $624,177 Notes 1 Residential lot with frontage on city PMP street. 2 Corner Lot-two streets being reconstructed on local PMP street-assessed 1/2 unit assessment for each street=1 full assessment 3 Corner Lot-one street being reconstructed on local PMP street-assessed 1/2 unit assessment 4 Oversized lot on local PMP street.Two platted lots of record. 1 full assessment,1 deferred assessment 5 Residential lot with frontage on city PMP street and alley frontage 6 General Mills building:assessed on rate of$91.73 per front foot.Taxpayer address:C/O Tax Dept,P 0 Box 1113,Minneapolis,MN 55440 7 Duplex:1300 and 1304 Gettysburg Ave N,1 1/2 unit assessments(1300 assessed at 1/2 unit assessment due to comer lot) 8 City Park:6 potential lots were assessed at the residental assessment rate,2 potential lots were not assessed because of potential flooding issues. 9 Taxpayer Address:Family Afford HSG Program,390 Robert St N,St Paul MN 55101 10 Taxpayer Address:7800 Golden Valley Rd,Golden Valley,MN 55427 11 Taxpayer Address:4720 Hittner Pointe,Eagan MN 55122 12 Taxpayer Address:82 Shadywood La,Delano,MN 55328 13 Tax forfeited property.Defer assessment until home construction or development. 14 Taxpayer Address:8951 Tewsbury Gate,Maple Grove,MN 55311 15 Gettysburg frontage being reconstructed in 2015,Olympia in 2017.Assess full unit with 2015 project. 16 Winsdale frontage being reconstructed in 2015,Hillsboro in 2016.Assess full unit with 2015 project. 17 Flag frontage being reconstructed in 2015,Naper in 2017.Assess full unit with 2015 project. 18 Taxpayer Address:709 Wayzata Blvd E,Wayzata MN 55391-1738 19 Taxpayer Address:620 Kingswood Lane,Unit E,Simi Valley,CA 93065-7683 20 Taxpayer Addres:12725-28th Ave N,Plymouth,MN 55441 21 General Mills assessment-1/2 levied,1/2 defered until property adjacent to Flag Avenue is developed OR non-emergency driveway entrance is developed on Flag Avenue O O O O O O O O O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M O N O c0 c0 c0 (D c0 (O (O N (O (O c0 (O f0 N (O N N O N O (O N (O (O t0 (O c0 IO c0 t0 c0 (O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O o 0 0 O F p 0 0 0 0. 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W O O O O p Op 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p Op p Op O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O p Op N C6 O O O O O (O COO (00 (00 COO (p0 (00 (00 (00 (O (O (00 (00 (00 (00 (OO (00 (00 (00 (pO (p0 (00 (00 (00 (00 (00 (00 (00 (OD f0 W N M 0 (O (O (O (0 D W O OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO wron M (O0 (0 0 O M 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W QV3 N fA w A (A w (A (A w A Nto NfA A (A (A fA fA b9 fA fA (A (A (A (A EA(A (A (/f 12 N n K 2 O w � Z M V N N M W F O�OD C C W W O W W W W W W W W O W W (NO, W (n (n u") N M (C) (0 O N N N )n N M M m m m m aD N oD au m m aD m oo m � n n Z O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O M " O W) O O O (O O O 0 0 0 0 O O N O O O (D O t0 N O O N N N N O m m N O (O N N 0 0 (O N W W co (O (O (O (O N K LL S U K 0] N Q W Q z p W O Z O W N O N W z J J F... Z J Z p a U U W g ¢ O W J Z Z 0 J W U ° Z S�S p O N (� p 2 Q Z W 0 O O ¢ N O O Ix x 0 > W 3 U ~ 0 U = W 2 Q w_ Y p = W Z LL (n S Y Y Z w W Z w Z Q U Z S H U Z � ot} W O C) p z Y O Z u Y It o U w M W a (n H m O W J N O a QQ 2 W Z r z y Y W 0 ¢ g Q ¢ a F J Y g w 0 x N o z m w F- 02 m 0 ¢ U S Q m Q d eC (n (A p � W 0 a Z Z o Q W Q H x W o6 O m F 0 2 z z ¢ U w � °� � J j W a W a � p ¢ ¢ � � ymZg ¢J¢ (npwyw 2 n My (�>Wjy Q a M Z a 0 3 > o > z Cf W Z wm U M <0 Q w 2 � � j w 0 Z Z � m Q > 0 z a z o m x a J w a o a o a w ¢ m w U Q w a 2 w m O x m H Q v. Q Y W 2 � 2E U W Z LL Q m p Y J p p K p O M O I� cpo z z z z z z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z z z Z z Z Z z z z z z z z z z z z z W w W W W w w W W W W w W w w > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > a ¢ a ¢ a ¢ a ¢ ¢ a a a a a a a a F ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w WOOOOOOOOOOOOOO O O O O O D U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U Z Z z z z Z Z Z z Z z Z Z Z Z Z Z 11 w w x x w S w w w w S w w S of I w w w W w W W W w W w W w W W W w W w W 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p y m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m z Z Z Z Z Z z Z Z Z z z z z z Z Z (n (n (n (A V) (n (n (n N (n (n N (n (n N N N N O W w W W W w W W w W W W W w W W W J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J d a d d d a d LL LL a a a a a a a d (9 LLD, W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W d 0 C'J 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 p p p p p O O p p p p p p p p p 0 a F Z Z Z Z Z Z Z z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z z d w V O U) � � Z ~ (~n ° _ _ Q y w O W OZ J z O 0 N W N M 0 n O V M N O (n OD W V OD N M N r V (0) O V (n OD M' N _ W N N N N N O O O O pp S p p R J ¢ a N LL U N M M M M M M M M M M M M C) V V V V (A M M MON7 M V V V V Z< Z W Q o O Q Z , w N N N p Z w ¢ Zrn r rn m OM MO OV r0 T 00 rn N0 rn rn V0 (MO W (ND N 0 r M r Vn r uM) 00 N r n MM 0 0 W m O a p Z o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U) 0 0 o `b' g o S o o g g o g o 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 g $ o 0 0 0 0 o g o o g g o C (OD W a' H W O p M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M co M co > a, Z N a M M M M M M ` M M M M M M M M M M M ^ M M C) M M M M M M M M M M M M M M •� O LL N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N y O y U J = QD N N O N OD N N W N W N N N OD 07 OO N OJ W CO W OD N W N N CO N W W N N N OD W ~ O ~ w r- O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O p O O O O O O O O O O O O pp O CL U " U 00 Cl) Cl) Cl) M M Cl) Cl) M COCOM M M M M M co M M M M M 3011821330024 1500 INDEPENDENCE AVE N ROBERT J THERIEN 202.4 2 1 $0.00 $6,600.00 $6,600 3011821330039 1501 INDEPENDENCE AVE N ANNETTE KROSCH 218.4 2 1 $0.00 $6,600.00 $6,600 3011821330025 1504 INDEPENDENCE AVE N STEPHEN&JANET REED 61.8 1 1 $0.00 $6,600.00 $6,600 3011821330038 1505 INDEPENDENCE AVE N MARTHA P HOCKEL 123.6 1,8 1 $0.00 $6,600.00 $6,600 3011821330026 1508 INDEPENDENCE AVE N GERALD R&ANNE M WOODHULL 61.81 1 $0.00 $6,600.00 $6,600 3011821330027 1512 INDEPENDENCE AVE N MATTHEW A KATO 62 1 1 $0.00 $6,600.00 $6,600 3011821330037 1 1513 INDEPENDENCE AVE N RUTH J NOLAN 61.8 1 1 $0.00 $6,600.00 $6,600 3011821330127 1516 INDEPENDENCE AVE N BRIDGET HELEN BUSCH 61.8 1 1 $0.00 $6,600.00 $6,600 3011821330036 1517 INDEPENDENCE AVE N MICHELLE K SPAETH 61.8 1 1 $0.00 $6,600.00 $6,600 3011821330128 1520 INDEPENDENCE AVE N WILLIAM M HALL 61.8 1 1 $0.00 $6,600.00 $6,600 3011821330035 1521 INDEPENDENCE AVE N RICHARD&DEBRA ITOW 61.8 1 1 $0.00 $6,600.00 $6,600 3011821330030 1524 INDEPENDENCE AVE N ROBERT&CINDY BRUCKBAUER 61.81 1 $0.00 $6,600.00 $6,600 3011821330133 1525 INDEPENDENCE AVE N CLAIRE SHEA&USMAN HUSSAIN 61.8 1 1 $0.00 $6,600.00 $6,600 3011821330033 1529 INDEPENDENCE AVE N JESSIE K TIEDE 61.8 1 1 $0.00 $6,600.00 $6,600 3011821330031 1532 INDEPENDENCE AVE N RICHARD D QUIGLEY 264.67 2,16 1 $0.00 $6,600.00 $6,600 3011821330032 9405 OLYMPIA ST SHIRLEY A SUNDI N 198.87 1,16 1 $0.00 $6,600.00 $6,600 3011821330048 9405 WINSDALE ST LUELLA M LINDE 198.3 2 1 $0.00 $6,600.00 $6,600 3011821330040 9450 WINSDALE ST KAYLEY S&AARON M GILMORE 136.6 3 0.5 $0.00 $3,300 $3,300 Total Deferred Assmts= $16,500.00 Total Levied Assmts= $349,800 Total Assessments= $366,300 Notes 1 Residential lot with frontage on city PMP street. 2 Comer Lot-two streets being reconstructed on local PMP street-assessed 1/2 unit assessment for each street=1 full assessment 3 Comer Lot-one street being reconstructed on local PMP street-assessed 1/2 unit assessment 4 Oversized lot on local PMP street. Two platted lots of record. 1 full assessment,1 deferred assessment 5 Taxpayer Address:4608 Nevada Ave,Crystal,MN 55428 6 Taxpayer Address:5000 Plano Parkway,Carrollton,TX 75010 7 Taxpayer Address:16000 Hilltop Rd,Eden Prairie,MN 55347 8 Taxpayer Address:C/O Janette Pharo,11225 Xenia Ave N,Champlin,MN 55316 9 Taxpayer Address:1430 Orkla Dr,Golden Valley,MN 55427 10 Taxpayer Address:6005 Westmore Way,Golden Valley,MN 55422 11 Taxpayer Address:6788 Lakeview Cir,Corcoran,MN 55340 12 Taxpayer Address:Family Afford HSG Program,390 Robert St N,St Paul MN 55101 13 Taxpayer Address:4801 Frederica St,Owensboro,KY 42301 14 New owner as of 8/15/2014. 15 Not subdividable due to lot shape,no deferred assessments 16 Independence frontage being reconstructed in 2016,Olympia in 2017.Assess full unit with 2016 project. 17 Two platted lots of record and corner lot-assessed 1/2 unit assessment for corner and deferred one assessment Preliminary Special Assessment Roll CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY 2017 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM CITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT RATE= $6,600.00 MULTI RESIDENTIAL FRONT FOOTAGE RATE= OTHER ZONINGS,LOCAL STREET $91.73 RES. DEFERRED LEVIED TOTAL PID HOUSE NO. STREET PROPERTY OWNERS FRONTAGE Notes UNITS ASSMTS ASSMTS ASSMTS. 3011821320024 9345 EARL ST LINDSAY R TRAPP 60 3,5 1 $0.00 $3,300 $3,300 3011821320035 9385 EARL ST MICHAEL J HOFFER 60 3,5 1 $0.00 $3,300 $3,300 3011821320065 1601 GETTYSBURG AVE N VAL LEVEY&CYNTHIA G LEVEY 226.57 2 1 $0.00 $6,600 $6,600 3011821320048 1604 GETTYSBURG AVE N JACOB A&JANET M BEEBE 61 5 1 $0.00 $6,600 $6,600 3011821320064 1609 GETTYSBURG AVE N JOHN A&DONNA OSTDIEK 91.5 1 1 $0.00 $6,600 $6,600 3011821320049 1612 GETTYSBURG AVE N ZACHARY PEDERSON&ELIZABETH JOHNSON 61 1 1 $0.00 $6,600 $6,600 3011821320063 1613 GETTYSBURG AVE N MARK J&PAIVI K WUOLLET 61 1 1 $0.00 $6,600 $6,600 3011821320050 1614 GETTYSBURG AVE N GREGORY S&SUSAN K CLOSE 61 1 1 $0.00 $6,600 $6,600 3011821320051 1616 GETTYSBURG AVE N WILLARD J RYAN 61 1 1 $0.00 $6,600 $6,600 3011821320062 1617 GETTYSBURG AVE N AARON WAYNE DAVIS 61 1 1 $0.00 $6,600 $6,600 3011821320052 1620 GETTYSBURG AVE N JEROME&WENDY NALEZNY 61 1 1 $0.00 $6,600 $6,600 3011821320061 1621 GETTYSBURG AVE N THOMAS BREITWEISER 61 1 1 $0.00 $6,600 $6,600 3011821320053 1624 GETTYSBURG AVE N KEITH A RONSEN 61 1 1 $0.00 $6,600 $6,600 3011821320060 1625 GETTYSBURG AVE N LINDA MARY HASSLER 61 1 1 $0.00 $6,600 $6,600 3011821320054 1628 GETTYSBURG AVE N MICHAEL J&STACY L SPITZACK 61 1 1 $0.00 $6,600 $6,600 3011821320059 1629 GETTYSBURG AVE N CYNTHIA D REICHERT 61 1 1 $0.00 $6,600 $6,600 3011821320055 1632 GETTYSBURG AVE N JANICE N WILLIAMS 61 1 1 $0.00 $6,600 $6,600 3011821320058 1633 GETTYSBURG AVE N ERIC PETERSON 61 1 1 $0.00 $6,600 $6,600 3011821320056 1636 GETTYSBURG AVE N JAMES P GIRONIMI II 199.5 2 1 $0.00 $6,600 $6,600 3011821320057 1637 GETTYSBURG AVE N LEVI KOLWINSKA&ALISON KOLWINSKA 202.08 2 1 $0.00 $6,600 $6,600 3011821320123 1715 GETTYSBURG CT LEO YUSUF&SENBETA ISMAIEL 68.71 3 0.5 $0.00 $6,600 $6,600 3011821320084 1601 HILLSBORO AVE N TERRY FREELS&GLORIA FREELS 202 2 1 $0.00 $6,600 $6,600 3011821320067 1604 HILLSBORO AVE N KEVIN LYLE WELLMANN 61 1,12 1 $0.00 $6,600 $6,600 3011821320083 1605 HILLSBORO AVE N BETH MASSELINK 61 1 1 $0.00 $6,600 $6,600 3011821320068 1608 HILLSBORO AVE N DOUGLAS H ANGOVE 61 1 1 $0.00 $6,600 $6,600 3011821320082 1609 HILLSBORO AVE N SCOTT SHOWALTER 61 1 1 $0.00 $6,600 $6,600 3011821320069 1612 HILLSBORO AVE N ROBERT E SPETZ&ELAINE M SPETZ 61 1 1 $0.00 $6,600 $6,600 3011821320081 1613 HILLSBORO AVE N TRACY A ZANITSCH 61 1 1 $0.00 $6,600 $6,600 3011821320070 1616 HILLSBORO AVE N MARK D ROBERTSON 61 1 1 $0.00 $6,600 $6,600 3011821320080 1617 HILLSBORO AVE N DAVID F TUPA 61 1 1 $0.00 $6,600 $6,600 3011821320071 1620 HILLSBORO AVE N ISTEVEN L DOLCE/LORI J DOLCE 61 1 1 $0.00 $6,600 $6,600 3011821320079 1621 HILLSBORO AVE N HARRY T RINOWSKI 61 1 1 $0.00 $6,600 $6,600 3011821320072 1624 HILLSBORO AVE N MICHAEL BARANOWSKI 122 1,4 1 $6,600.00 $6,600 $13,200 3011821320078 1625 HILLSBORO AVE N HEIDI ANN MILLER&DONALD PATRICK OLSON 61 1 1 $0.00 $6,600 $6,600 3011821320077 1629 HILLSBORO AVE N KENNETH M VALENTO 61 1 1 $0.00 $6,600 $6,600 8 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 o 0 0 o o o (O (O (0 (0 (O (0 (O c0 t0 0 0 0 O m O O (O (O O c0 c0 0 m 0 0 0 O (C 0 0 0 O O O N O O O M (D Q M (0 (O (0 (0 (0 (0 c0 (O (O m N O (O 0 0 0 O O 0 O O 0 O O w 0 w (0 (0 (0 (0 (O w w m o o w w w (O M o m m (0 (0 w (A (A b9 (A Yi fR fA (9 fA (A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . fA fA - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O M 0 0 (0 (O (O (O f0 (O (0 (D (0 (0 c0 c0 (O (O (0 (O (O (0 (0 (0 (O (0 (0 (O (D (O (O O O O 0 O O O O c0 O (O0 cc`"')) ((OO 0 � � � � � SS8888SSS000000o88SSSSS88888SSSoSSS888S $ S 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 o 0 o o o 0 0 o 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 o 0 o 0 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 6 0 0 0 (» (9 (9 (9 (fl (» b4 (» b9 f9 fA (» (» (» (9 (» . . . . . » (» (» Yi fA f9 f9 » (» 69 Vi (» (» (» fR f9 YJ (9 (9 (H (A (N (fl (A d3 (» (» HJ (A (A (A .- M N O 0 — m � N � (n r r In � 47 O (n � M m 7 M m n n m O (D O O Ic lo Oi c0 (O (O (O ([ cD (O n (0 (i') c0 c0 (O (O p (n 0 00 0 OO ooo OOOOO N N 0 0 0 O 0 0 O O N N (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 N a Z Z a � r 2io Q J Y d W J Z W U N m CQ'J J Z Q ~ Z O } 2 Q 3 u) O 00 W Z z 2 �NN z S O Q x O > Q Y r m > Z x a � D Z .g Z Z � qa � o `� Z = mz QQwQo -60Z Z (n W x U p x Cr W p N Q Z U U p Q a Lu zY O a of Y g H z x p W W p W Cr J U Z r Q 0 W w J F- z r N 0 z m 0 m U Z Y (n ay x Q W 7 z p O O W } x J W J Y Z U` a J 0 r - Z W r z 2 O z a w O 2 Z a W Z W 0 r � Z YzDw2r �u 0 > aSg0Lu v) w amYu' o2 (n W rN � mOzo � z0J2Oxzg � a ¢ 0 x = a x r 5 of O m > g p � m 0w � w 0 m � Q � w � Z z Oz W a w Qx � (� J Z W w w a p 2 z W y a x x 2 3 Q 3 a m z U O C� r x Q z » � � S x J w x � z = w x a x a x 0 0 2 x 0 ' U a -a Q } W Z W O 2 J O a Z g W - Z O r J Z U` Z �1.IQJ y m O m LU LUx (� U Z x r W x 0 Q m 0 r W z x Q Q W 0 Q< Luxp W W 5 x J x < U Q Z S Z O Z > m W O Q a 0 2 W O Z V V Z a Q HQ x Z a Z U J Q Z W x Z x J m J Q 2Q Y W 2qM O O x W Q F O H Q 0 0 0 2 0 W S w 0 O W S Y m< Q d OU W Y U U E D D O m Q N < ? -Wi C7 J O m Q u) m x m r x Y r a r Y J K 2 0 a z Z Z z z Z Z Z z z z z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z z Z Z Z Z z Z Z Z z z z Z Z Z Z Z z Z Z Z Z z z W W W W W w w w W W w w W w W W W w w w w W w w W w W w w w W w W W W w W W w W W W w W > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > a a a a a a a a a a a a a ¢ a a a a ¢ a Q a a a a Q Q a a a Q a a a a a a a a a a Q Q Q w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w z z zF- 00000 -00000 0 U 0 U 0 U U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U U U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U U U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 x x x of x x xx z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z 0 0 o x x x w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w 0 m m w w w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o m m m a a a m m m m m z z Z Z z z Z z z z z z z Z Z Z Z Z Z z z Z Z Z z Z Z z z z z z Z Z Z Z J J J a Q Q m m m m m WW W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W Z Z Z J J J J J a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a m m a Ono w W w W W W w W W w w W W W W W W w w w w W W W W W W W w w w W w W W W Z Z Z 2 2 2 2 2 p p p p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W W W Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z O M (O (n n 0 (0 00 m N M (O n 0 et (A N O N O (0 m M n 0 O (0 N m N M w n N 0 0 0 0 0 (MO (MO (MO N OD (00 (00 (0 (00 (00 (00 (O (0 (O (O (ND (ND (NO (NO (NO (NO (MO (MO O O O n n r 000 W 000 o o W r m m m M n (0 N (0 N n 0 m m m O n N m M V N O m N m n 0 (D N N M M N n 0 M m O n n n N w m o M OD O Co O w W m CO m m m m m m m m m m O O N O M O M O M O M O M O O •f r M M M 0 0 o o 0 o o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 o 0 o 0 0 0 S S 8 0 8 g o 0 o S o o g o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 8 0 0 0 o S o S g o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o g o g o 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M N N N N N M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O O O 00 OD OD OD N OD OD N CO O CO OD OD OD W 00 D) au f0 O N W W W N N N W O 00 N W OD N 00 00 W W OD O 00 N O W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p O O O O O O O O O O O O O OO o p O O O O O o O O O O O p p p O O O O O O o M M M M M M M M 0 M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M Co O M M M M M M M M M M M O O O M M Co M M M Co 3011821320136 9130 NAPER ST AHMED ALI&NASRO WEHELIE 104.14 1 1 $0.00 $3,300 $3,300 3011821320120 9300 NAPER ST COUNTY OF HENNEPIN 951.56 7,13 0 $0.00 $87,287 $87,287 3011821320075 9345 NAPER ST VIRGINIA H ZOUBEK 203 2 1 $0.00 $6,600 $6,600 3011821320066 9200 OLYMPIA ST SHAWN KNAUS&JESSICA M GUSTAFSON 196.07 2 1 $0.00 $6,600 $6,600 3011821320103 9450 OLYMPIA ST ALAN H&DENISE E STRANDLUND 121 3,6 1 $0.00 $0.00 $0 Total Deferred Assmts= $6,600.00 Total Levied Assmts= $615,287 Total Assessments= $621,887 Notes 1 Residential lot with frontage on city PMP street. 2 Comer Lot-two streets being reconstructed on local PMP street-assessed 1/2 unit assessment for each street=1 full assessment 3 Comer Lot-one street being reconstructed on local PMP street 4 Oversized lot on local PMP street.Two platted lots of record. 1 full assessment,1 deferred assessment 5 Residential lot with frontage on city PMP street and alley frontage 6 Property has history of flooding.No assessment. 7 Building:assessed by rate of$91.73 per front foot. 8 Taxpayer Address:12805 HWY 55#400,Plymouth MN 55441 9 Taxpayer Address:1216 Omaha St,Eau Claire,WI 54703-9999 10 Taxpayer Address:1933 James Ave S,Minneapolis,MN 55403 11 Taxpayer Address:42145 Birchwood Dr,Emily,MN 56447 12 Taxpayer Address:15605 49th Ave N,Plymouth,MN 55446 13 Taxpayer Address:ATTN:Real Estate Manager,701 4th Ave S Suite 400,Minneapolis,MN 55415 14 Not subdividable due to lot shape,no deferred assessments 15 Assessed 1/2 unit assessment for 2017 PMP project.To be assessed 1/2 unit assessment for future project. 16 Taxpayer Address:2209 Burr St,Maplewood MN 55117-1809 Appendix C ` 'w Memorandum Golden ValleyPublic Works 763.593.8030/763.593.3988(fax) Date: November 26, 2014 To: Jeff Oliver, PE, City Engineer From: Al Lundstrom, Forester/ Park Maintenance Supervisor Subject: Tree and Shrub Impacts: 2015/2016/2017 Pavement Management Program Based upon the preliminary design for this project, staff has established an estimate of the potential tree and shrub impacts for the 2015/2016/2017 Pavement Management Program. A limited number of significant trees may be removed due to street reconstruction, utility repairs and installation. A significant number of trees located in the right-of-way have been designated for tree protection. This protection may include fencing and directionalized boring or tunneling under these trees when new gas mains and gas services are installed. The final determinations of the tree and shrub removals will be made in the field during construction. The following is a breakdown of the potential tree impacts: 2015 Neighborhood -Approximately four (4) trees and fifteen (15) shrubs may need to be removed and replaced for the proposed street and utility construction. 2016 Neighborhood - Approximately seven (7) trees and thirty-eight (38) shrubs may need to be removed and replaced for the proposed street and utility construction. 2017 Neighborhood -Approximately nine (9) Trees and forty-seven (47) Shrubs may need to be removed and replaced for the proposed street and utility construction. Impacts to trees and shrubs due to utility service repairs are anticipated to be low. Recommended repairs for sanitary services will include lining in many circumstances as opposed to removal and replacement. The City Forester and Assistant Forester will be responsible for monitoring and inspecting tree and shrub impacts during the project. If tree or shrub removal is required, each will be replaced on a minimum 1-to-1 basis. Additional trees or shrubs are added for larger removals. A color photo list of replacement trees and shrubs with information regarding their characteristics including mature size and growth habits is provided to each resident. The replacement shade trees are 2-'/2 inches in diameter at the base and balled in burlap. Replacement evergreen trees are approximately six feet high. The trees are furnished, installed and warranted for two years by the contractor. Replacement trees and shrubs can be located anywhere on the adjacent homeowner's property. The forestry staff provides consulting services for residents who would like help choosing replacement trees and their locations. Certain restrictions apply to corner visibility and right-of-way areas. S:\FJ\G\Goldv\125641\4-prelim-dsgn-rprts\word\Appendix B Tree Impacts.docx Resolution 15-06 January 6, 2015 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION ORDERING CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN PROPOSED PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND AUTHORIZING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS PROJECT NO. 15-01: 2015 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PROJECT NO. 16-01: 2016 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PROJECT NO. 17-01: 2017 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Golden Valley, Minnesota, as follows: 1 . That a public hearing held on this day at 7:00 pm, at the address of 7800 Golden Valley Road in the City of Golden Valley, Minnesota, after notice of said hearing duly published as required by law, this Council has consulted the view of all persons interested, and, being fully advised of the pertinent facts, does hereby determine to proceed with the construction of certain proposed public improvements for the said City, in accordance with the description of said improvements contained in said notice. 2. It is hereby found and determined that Public Improvements Projects 15-01, 16-01 and 17-01 are feasible and can best be constructed as set forth in said report and not in connection with some other improvements. (The Council reserves the right to consolidate said improvements with other public improvements if it seems advisable to do so.) It is further found that the improvements are effective and necessary. 3. The cost of said improvements shall be paid in part out of special assessment to be levied as set forth in said notice of public hearing. 4. The City Engineer is hereby designated as engineer for the proposed public improvements, and is hereby authorized, ordered and instructed to prepare final plans and specifications for said improvements and obtain proposals for the same in accordance with said report except as modified at the Public Hearing. 5. That the City Clerk shall prepare an Advertisement for Bids for making such improvements. The advertisement shall be published as required by statute, shall specify work to be done and shall state the time and place that the bids shall be opened and considered by the City Engineer and City Clerk, and that no bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the Clerk. Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by the City Clerk. City of �� � d1001% olden R �� �� u Planning valley g Department 763-593-8095/763-593-8109 (fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting January 6, 2015 60 day deadline:January 6, 2015 Agenda Item 4. B. Public Hearing- Approval of Conditional Use Permit 138 - 905 Decatur Avenue North - Our World Shops, Inc., Applicant Prepared By Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager Summary Our World Shops, Inc., is proposing to include a retail component to accompany its office/warehouse use in its new location at 905 Decatur Avenue North. This property is zoned Industrial and guided for long-term Industrial use. Retail sales are allowed as an accessory use with a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) if the retail area occupies less than 10% of the building's footprint. The Applicant will be leasing 16,000 square feet in a one story multi-tenant building. The proposed retail component will use 3,000 to 3,750 square feet in a building with a footprint of over 101,100 square feet. This translates to between 3% and 4% of the building's footprint. There are no other retail components in this building. At the December 8, 2014, Planning Commission meeting the Commission voted 7-0 to recommend approval of the proposal. Specifically, the Commission felt the proposed use was in compliance with the ten factors in the City Code that determine the eligibility of a conditional use, subject to the following conditions: 1. The plans by submitted by the Applicant on November 7, 2014, shall become a part of this approval. 2. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from Fire Chief John Crelly to Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager, dated November 26, 2014, shall become part of this approval. 3. All signage must meet the requirements of the City's Sign Code (Section 4.20). 4. This approval is subject to all other state, federal, and local ordinances, regulations, or laws with authority over this development. Attachments • Location Map (1 page) • Planning Commission Minutes dated December 8, 2014 (3 pages) • Memo to the Planning Commission, dated December 8, 2014 (2 pages) • Memo from Fire Chief John Crelly dated November 26, 2014 (1 page) • Applicant's Narrative (1 page) • Exterior Plan (1 page) • Floor Plan (1 page) • Ordinance #535 (2 pages) Recommended Action Motion to adopt Ordinance #535, Approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 138, 905 Decatur Avenue North, Our World Shops, Applicant. 9000 9200 Subject Property: 8900 905 Decatur Ave. N. 9100 � hAveN .....�...�" 890 -�^ 888,; 965 93 870 92 5 860 8'38 854 • NIM 903 2 830 a 9t05 < 840 B 830 850 A V 820" ski 742: 833 696 1690161L 682 680 . 676 672 730 668 670 664 Regular Meeting of the Golden Valley Planning Commission December 8, 2014 ular meeting of the PI ning Commission was held at the Golden Valley City Hall, Coun hambers, 7800 G Iden Val a ,Golden Valley, Minnesota, on Monday, December 14. Chair u called the meeting to order at 7 pm. Those present Ian missioners Baker, Blum, Cera, Johnson, Kluchka, and Waldhaus so present as Plann anager Jason Zimmerman, Associate Plan rant Writer Emil Goellner, and Ad mistrative Assistant Lisa Wittman. missioner Segelbau was absent. 1. Informal Public Hearing — Conditional Use Permit— 905 Decatur Ave N — Our World Shops, Inc. — CU-138 Applicant: Our World Shops Address: 905 Decatur Avenue North Purpose: To allow accessory retail services and/or sales incidental to a permitted use in the Industrial zoning district. Zimmerman reviewed the applicant's request for a Conditional Use Permit to allow accessory retail sales incidental to a permitted use at 905 Decatur Ave. N. The majority of the space would be used for warehouse and office use. He explained that up to 10% of a building's entire footprint can be used for accessory retail sales in the Light Industrial and Industrial zoning districts and that the Applicant is proposing to have 3,000 to 3,750 square feet (3% to 4%) of retail outlet space in the 101 ,100 square foot building. He stated that the property has approximately 130 parking spaces and that the applicant expects 10 to 20 cars to visit per day. He stated that the staff is recommending approval of this Conditional Use Permit proposal. Kluchka asked how many types of similar Conditional Use Permit requests the City has seen. Zimmerman stated that are a few similar Conditional Use Permits. Baker said he knows of a wholesale use nearby and asked if this is the same type of use. Zimmerman stated that wholesale and showroom uses have different requirements. The majority of the use in this case is warehouse and office space with the retail sales being incidental. Baker asked what types of products will be sold. Zimmerman said home goods. Blum asked when Conditional Use Permits expire. Zimmerman said Conditional Use Permits don't expire unless the business leaves, or there is a significant change in the use. Waldhauser asked what happens to the Conditional Use Permit if there is a new owner of the business. Zimmerman said a Conditional Use Permit amendment would be required. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission December 8, 2014 Page 2 Ben Horn, Applicant, stated that he operates six e-commerce sites that sell products from Finland, shower curtains, umbrellas, and glass collectibles. He stated that the web portion of his business accounts for approximately 91% of the revenue and the retail outlet accounts for approximately 9% of the revenue. He said he wouldn't have a retail store, except for some of the brands require him to have a physical presence. Johnson asked the Applicant why he chose Golden Valley. Horn stated that he couldn't find a space in Minneapolis that met his needs because he requires a dock and retail space but can't afford a retail building. Blum asked the Applicant how many jobs his business will provide. Horn said they have 12 full time employees and 8 to 10 part time employees depending on the time of year. Blum asked if he expects a high volume of customers. Horn stated it is really a destination shop and people won't be stopping by. He added that last year the retail sales averaged $760 per day, so it is not a high volume store. Baker asked the Applicant if he will have any signage. Horn said yes, and stated that the signage will be consistent with what the City allows. Kluchka opened the public hearing. Seeing and hearing no one wishing to comment, Kluchka closed the public hearing. Waldhauser said the proposed use seems like a reasonable fit with the area and she is in favor of recommending approval. Blum agreed and stated that there would be a minimal effect on traffic. MOVED by Johnson, seconded by Blum and motion carried unanimously to recommend approval of Conditional Use Permit at 905 Decatur Avenue North to allow accessory retail services and/or sales incidental to a permitted use in the Industrial zoning district subject to the following findings and conditions. Findings 1. The applicant has demonstrated need for the use. 2. The proposal is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. 3. There will not be a negative effect on property values in the area. 4. The traffic generated from the proposed use will not conflict with current traffic in the area. 5. The density or population in the area will not increase due to the proposed use. 6. There will not be an increase in noise by the proposed use. 7. The proposed use will not create dust, odor or excessive vibration. 8. The proposed use will not attract animal pests. 9. The proposed use will not significantly alter the visual appearance of the existing building. 10. No other negative effects of the proposed use are anticipated. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission December 8, 2014 Page 3 Conditions 1. The plans by submitted by the Applicant on November 7, 2014, shall become a part of this approval. 2. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from Fire Chief John Crelly to Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager, dated November 26, 2014, shall become part of this approval. 3. All signage must meet the requirements of the City's Sign Code (Section 4.20). 4. This approval is subject to all other state, federal, and local ordinances, regulations, or laws with authority over this development. Informal Public Hearing — Preli inary PUD Plan — Struther's Parkinson's Center— 6701 Country Club D ve — PU-39, Amendment#4 plicant: Park Nicollet Addre 6701 CountryClub rive Purpose: To allow a building ddition approximately 2,700 square in s e and the constr ction of an outdoor memory ca alk/garden. Goellner referred to a sit Ian of the p perty and explained t applicant's request to amend their existing PU ermit to a ow for a building ition and the construction of an outdoor mo ment/th rapy garden. e stated that the proposed addition would be approximatel 700s uare feet ' size and would be used as a gathering space and for expande duc ion, r bilitation and training capabilities. She added that the Applicant is also op si to create an indoor/outdoor movement therapy garden with enhanced landsca and artwork. Goellner discussed the proposed p ing the site and stated that there are currently 181 parking spaces pl 4 proo o arking spaces at 6681 Country Club Drive. She stated that the Cit ode requir" s 1 parking spaces for clinic and office uses. After the parking are s reduced to Ilow fo the new landscaping, there will be 160 parking spaces wit ' the PUD which cludes e property at 6681 Country Club Drive. She added tha ere will be a shar parking a reement and an access easement between ie two property owne . Goellner state that staff is recommending, pproval of the liminary PUD amendmen Ian subject to the findings an conditions recom nded by Staff. Kluchk asked what "proof of parking" mea s. Goellner stated that means there is spac for parking available, but it is not con tructed unless and until i ' needed. K chka asked if the canopy referred to in the ire Chief's staff report was for truthers Parkinson's Center or for the office xt door. Goellner stated that both buildings have a canopy. (' Ty 0 { goldc, valley Planning Department 763-593-8095/763-593-8109(fax) Date: December 8, 2014 To: Golden Valley Planning Commission From: Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager Subject: Informal Public Hearing—Conditional Use Permit (CUP-138) to Allow for Accessory Retail Services Incidental to a Permitted Use at 905 Decatur Avenue North — Our World Shops, Inc., Applicant Background and Proposed Use Our World Shops, Inc., is proposing to include a retail component to accompany its office/warehouse use in its new location at 905 Decatur Avenue North. This property is zoned Industrial and guided for long-term Industrial use. Retail sales are allowed as an accessory use with a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) if the retail area occupies less than 10% of the building's footprint. The subject property is bounded by 10th Avenue North to the north and Decatur Avenue North to the east. It is surrounded to the west and south by industrial uses. The Applicant will be leasing 16,000 square feet in a one story multi-tenant building. The proposed retail component will use 3,000 to 3,750 square feet in a building with a footprint of over 101,100 square feet. This translates to between 3% and 4% of the building's footprint. There are no other retail components in this building. Office use will occupy 2,000 to 3,000 square feet and the warehouse will occupy 9,993 square feet. The Applicant currently operates a retail outlet at their 10,000 square foot Minneapolis location. Store hours are Monday through Saturday, 10 am to 5 pm with an additional two hours on Tuesday (until 7 pm). Occasional Sunday hours have been added. The Applicant states that typical daily traffic involves 15 to 25 customers in 10 to 20 cars. The site has a front parking lot that contains roughly 130 spaces. A rear loading area handles deliveries. Evaluation The findings and recommendations for a Conditional Use Permit are based upon any or all of the following factors: 1. Demonstrated Need for the Proposed Use: The City requires that an Applicant identify a market for the proposed good or service necessitating a CUP. Our World Shops, Inc., will be relocating from their current location in Minneapolis and will likely maintain if not grow their existing base of customers. 2. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan: An office/warehouse use with a retail component is consistent with the Industrial designation of this property on the General Land Use Plan Map, 3. Effect on Property Values: Staff anticipates the new use would have no impact on the surrounding property values. 4. Effect on Traffic: The number of trips associated with the proposed use is minimal and Staff does not expect any negative traffic impacts to the surrounding areas. 5. Effect of Increases in Population and Density: The proposed use may generate a minor increase in the number of employees at the location. 6. Increase in Noise Levels: The proposed use is not anticipated to cause an increase in noise levels. 7. Impact of Dust, Odor, or Vibration: The proposed use is not anticipated to cause an increase in dust, odor, or vibrations. 8. Impact of Pests: The proposed use is not anticipated to attract pests. 9. Visual Impact: Because the proposed use would only involve interior modifications, Staff does not anticipate a change in the visual quality of the property. 10. Other Impacts to the City and Residents: Staff does not anticipate any other negative effects of the proposed use. The location is an industrial area with plenty of available parking. Recommended Action Staff recommends approval of Conditional Use Permit 138 allowing for accessory retail services incidental to a permitted use at 905 Decatur Avenue North. The approval of a Conditional Use Permit is subject to the following conditions: 1. The plans by submitted by the Applicant on November 7, 2014, shall become a part of this approval. 2. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from Fire Chief John Crelly to Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager, dated November 26, 2014, shall become part of this approval. 3. All signage must meet the requirements of the City's Sign Code (Section 4.20). 4. This approval is subject to all other state, federal, and local ordinances, regulations, or laws with authority over this development. Attachments Location Map (1 page) Applicant's Narrative (1 page) Memo from Fire Chief John Crelly dated November 26, 2014 (1 page) Exterior Plan (1 page) Floor Plan (1 page) or o (4 Fire Department 763-593-8079 / 763-593-8098 (fax) Date: November 26, 2014 To: Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager From: John Crelly, Fire Chief Subject: CUP — 138, Our World Shops, Inc. —905 Decatur Avenue North I have reviewed the conditional use permit information for Our World Shops, Inc. located at 905 Decatur Avenue North. The proposed use of this tenant space as mercantile/sales, business office and warehouse is acceptable. However, there are code requirements that will need to be met. Listed below are my plan review comments. 1) The proposed use of the facility appears to signal a change in "occupancy use". A Code Analysis of the building will need to be conducted by a design professional and submitted to the City Building Official for review. 2) The existing fire sprinkler and fire alarm systems need to inspected and tested. Deficiencies note in the inspection /test reports will need to be corrected prior to occupancy. 3) Storage of product on storage racks to a height greater than 12 feet above the floor is considered high piled storage. This kind of storage arrangement is regulated by the Minnesota State Fire Code (MSFC) Chapter 23 and the National Fire Protection Association Standard #13 which details fire sprinkler requirements for storage. 4) The description of intended use of the site shall meet the requirements set forth in the Minnesota State Fire Code (MSFC). A partial list of common code items includes: a. Provide tenant space addressing, front and side doors. MSFC section 505.1 b. Provide fire extinguishers. MSFC section 906.1 c. Provide a code compliant fire sprinkler system. MSFC section 901.4 d. Provide for proper disposal of combustible /flammable waste. MSFC 304.1 e. Maintain occupancy separations between tenant spaces as required by the Minnesota State Building Code. MSFC 705 (if applicable) f. Provide and maintain flammable waste traps as required by the Minnesota State Building Code. (if applicable) g. Provide access key for the tenant space. Key will be placed in the fire department keybox. MSFC section 506 h. Maintain exit signs and emergency lighting. MSFC 1028.4 i. ....... If you have any questions, please contact me at 763-593-8065, or my e-mail address, jcrelly(agoldenvalleymn.gov Application for Conditional Use Permit Our World Shops, Inc. Narrative description of site usage: Our World Shops, Inc. is a 15-year-old company with 12 full-time and 8 part-time employees. The company's primary business is selling consumer products on the Internet through the company's six e-commerce websites: FinnStyle.com Aalto.com AlwaysMod.com EllaUmbrella.com G1assBirds.com ShowerCurtainsEtc.com Orders are placed on the company's websites or by phone and shipped from our warehouse via UPS or USPS. The company ships 75 to over 300 orders per day. The company is currently leasing a 10,000 sq ft space just outside the Minneapolis central business district. The company desires a larger space due to growth and will lease 16,000 sq ft at 905 Decatur Ave North contingent on getting all necessary permits. Our World Shops, Inc. also operates one retail outlet which accounts for less than 10% of the company's total revenue. Some of the brands we carry require that their products be offered at a physical store as a condition to selling online. The company desires to operate its retail store from the same physical location at its warehouse and offices due to the low volume of sales and the benefits of cross-utilizing staff and inventory. The retail store is currently co-located in an industrial-type building in Minneapolis along with the rest of the company's operations. Store hours are Mon, Weds, Thurs, Fri, Sat I Oam to 5pm and Tues I Oam to 7pm. We are not open Sundays at this time but do add Sunday hours from time to time. We also have an occasional store event(approx 6 times/year) after normal hours but those end by Bpm and typically draw around 50 customers. On a typical day, approximately 15 to 25 customers visit the retail store in 10 to 20 cars. Year-to-date store sales average under$900 per day. Our offerings are high-end home decor, textiles and tableware so our typical customer is affluent and educated. The proposed retail usage will be 3,000 to 3,750 square feet; offices will be 2,000 to 3,000 sq ft; warehouse will be 9,993 sq ft. The final layout is being designed by Smart Associates, Minneapolis. We do not anticipate any disturbing off-site impact from the small amount of traffic visiting our retail outlet. The building has over 90 parking spots so there is more than sufficient parking for our staff and customers. Decatur Avenue 1171 1-7 _ , 111P -I T "I v TI VI) zo 114 i�l 14 + 4r_y, i ,� tl�. L j r o . Q � — LUEE LiV :1 JL I Y 1 l 3 l� - - U r o OLij o L� �' ORDINANCE NO. 535, 2ND SERIES AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE Approval of Conditional Use Permit Number 138 905 Decatur Avenue North Our World Shops, Inc., Applicant The City Council for the City of Golden Valley hereby ordains as follows: Section 1. City Code Chapter 11 entitled "Land Use Regulations (Zoning)" is amended in Section 11.10, Subd. 2, and Section 11.30, by approving a Conditional Use Permit for a certain tract of land at 905 Decatur Avenue North, thereby allowing Our World Shops to have Accessory Retail Services incidental to a Permitted Use located in the Industrial Zoning District. This Conditional Use Permit is approved based on the findings of the Planning Commission pursuant to City Code Section 11.80, Subd. 2(G), which findings are hereby adopted and incorporated herein as follows: 1. The applicant has demonstrated need for the use. Our World Shops, Inc., will be relocating from their current location in Minneapolis and will likely maintain if not grow their existing base of customers. 2. An office/warehouse use with a retail component is consistent with the Industrial designation of this property on the General Land Use Plan Map. 3. The proposed use would have no impact on the surrounding property values. 4. The number of trips associated with the proposed use is minimal and is not expected to have any negative traffic impacts to the surrounding areas. 5. The proposed use may generate a nominal increase in the number of employees at the location. 6. The proposed use is not anticipated to cause an increase in noise levels. 7. The proposed use is not anticipated to cause an increase in dust, odor, or vibrations. 8. The proposed use is not anticipated to attract pests. 9. Because the proposed use would only involve interior modifications, Staff does not anticipate a change in the visual quality of the property. 10. Staff does not anticipate any other negative effects of the proposed use. The location is an industrial area with plenty of available parking. This Conditional Use Permit is subject to all of the terms of the permit to be issued including, but not limited to the following specific conditions: 1. The plans submitted by the Applicant on November 7, 2014, shall become a part of this approval. 2. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from Fire Chief John Crelly to Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager, dated November 26, 2014, shall become part of this approval. 3. All signage must meet the requirements of the City's Sign Code (Section 4.20). 4. This approval is subject to all other state, federal, and local ordinances, regulations, or laws with authority over this development. Section 2. The tract of land affected by this ordinance is legally described as follows: Parcel 1: Lot 1, Block 4, Golden Valley Industrial Park Parcel 2: Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 1293, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Section 3. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Sec. 11 .99 entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 4. This ordinance shall take effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law. Adopted by the City Council this 6t" day of January, 2015. /s/Shepard M. Harris Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: /s/ Kristine A. Luedke Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk Cite c� n 0 valley Planning Department 763-593-8095/763-593-8109(fax) Executive Summary for Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting January 6, 2015 "120 Days" Deadline: January 9, 2015 Agenda Item 4. C. Public Hearing- Preliminary PUD Plan for Struthers Parkinson's Center PUD No. 39, Amendment #4 - 6681 & 6701 Country Club Drive - Park Nicollet Methodist Hospital, Applicant Prepared By Emily Goellner, Associate Planner/Grant Writer Summary Park Nicollet Methodist Hospital, owner of Struthers Parkinson's Center at 6701 Country Club Drive, is requesting an amendment to PUD No. 39. The two properties in PUD No. 39 are zoned "Institutional (1-3)" and are guided for long-term office use on the General Land Use Plan map. The total area for the PUD is 4.8 acres. The PUD is bounded by Country Club Drive to the north and trunk Highway 55 to the south. The proposed PUD amendment would allow the Applicant to expand the Struthers Parkinson's Center. The proposed building addition would increase the footprint by 2,680 square feet from 15,292 square feet to 17,972 square feet. The new addition will consist primarily of brick and glass. The accent brick will match the existing fagade material. The building expansion would require a reduction in the size of the parking area and in the number of parking spaces. A portion of the building, totaling 7,825 square feet, would be remodeled as part of this project. The additions and renovations would relocate and expand rehabilitation program services, create a gathering space, expand education and training capabilities, and create an indoor/outdoor movement therapy garden with enhanced landscaping and artwork. The proposal meets the parking requirements and no new parking spaces are required. Combining both properties, 158 parking spaces are required for the entire PUD site. The applicant proposes that 160 spaces be provided with 35 spaces designated as proposed areas of parking for any future need on the south side of 6681 Country Club Drive. Between the two buildings, there are 35 parking spaces that are easily accessible to both buildings. While these spaces are located on the property at 6681 Country Club Drive, the spaces have been used by both property owners since the PUD was created. The applicant has provided a letter from Attorney Tory Jackson at Faegre Baker Daniels LLP stating that the easement rights recorded with the Office of the County Recorder of Hennepin County are perpetual and remain in full force and effect between the property owners. The easement allows shared access to this parking area. A memorandum from the Engineering Division addressing traffic management, sanitary sewer services, water services, stormwater management, tree preservation, and landscaping is attached. The Fire Department reviewed this proposal to ensure that an adequate water supply is provided and that adequate emergency vehicle access is achieved on the site. A memorandum from the Fire Department that addresses emergency vehicle access is attached. The Planning Commission reviewed the proposal at their December 8 meeting and recommended conditional approval. City Code establishes standards for PUDs, which are laid out in the Staff report to the Planning Commission. In addition, City Code establishes findings that must be made by the City when creating a PUD. These findings are included in the City Council's recommended action. In order to be approved as a PUD, the City must be able to make the following findings: 1. Quality Site Planning. The PUD plan is tailored to the specific characteristics of the site and achieves a higher quality of site planning and design than generally expected under conventional provisions of the ordinance. 2. Preservation. The PUD plan preserves and protects substantial desirable portions of the site's characteristics, open space and sensitive environmental features including steep slopes, trees, scenic views, creeks, wetlands, and open waters. 3. Efficient— Effective. The PUD plan includes efficient and effective use (which includes preservation) of the land. 4. Compatibility. The PUD Plan results in development compatible with adjacent uses and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and redevelopment plans and goals. 5. General Health. The PUD plan is consistent with preserving and improving the general health, safety and general welfare of the people of the City. 6. Meets Requirements. The PUD plan meets the PUD Intent and Purpose provision and all other PUD ordinance provisions. Attachments • Location Map (1 page) • Planning Commission Minutes dated December 8, 2014 (3 pages) • Memo to the Planning Commission dated December 8, 2014 (5 pages) • Memo from the Fire Department dated December 1, 2014 (1 page) • Memo from the Engineering Division dated December 1, 2014 (4 pages) • Letter from Tory Jackson to Duane Spiegle dated December 8, 2014 (1 page) • Master Facility Plans dated September 12, 2014 (10 pages) • Site Plans dated November 7, 2014 (19 pages) • Landscape Plans dated November 7, 2014 (3 pages) • Survey dated November 7, 2014 (1 page) Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the Preliminary Plan for Struthers Parkinson's Center PUD No. 39, Amendment No. 4, subject to the following conditions: 1. The plans prepared by EAPC architects and submitted with the application on November 7, 2014, shall become a part of this approval. 2. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Fire Department to Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager, dated December 1, 2014, shall become a part of this approval. 3. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Engineering Division to Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager, dated December 1, 2014, shall become a part of this approval. 4. A shared parking agreement shall be confirmed or enacted upon or before Final PUD approval. 5. The Applicant shall submit a lighting plan that meets the requirements of the City's Outdoor Lighting Code (Section 11.73). 6. All signage must meet the requirements of the City's Sign Code (Section 4.20). 7. This approval is subject to all other state, federal, and local ordinances, regulations, or laws with authority over this development. 8. A final design plan shall be reviewed by the City prior to Final Plan approval. 63 Subject Property: 6701 Country Club Drive Country Club Dr - 6931 6909 6839 6823 6809 6745 550 545 Z 6681' m 6701 ,,, 6500. a 540 • 540 537 ------ ----- 512 510 52 5 530 State NwY N 0 55 6930 682(6810 State NWY KO 55 015011 LS f� rias NwY �""� ptson Met1O 76498 6657 6495 6672, .. >, 6494 450 - 6800 6820 6810 6489 5F }' 6837 a 440 \ 6481 6490 FL ^^ 6921 Cis 6931 Kingston 68306.4 84 �. 435 � 6475 430 1 �� Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission December 8, 2014 Page 3 Conditions The plans by s bmitted by th plicant on November 7, 2014, shall become a part ois approv . 2. The r me d sand requirements outlined in the memo from Fire Chief John Crelly to Jas immerman, Planning Manager, dated November 26, 2014, shall become thi roval. 3. All s'', age m 'st meet equirements of the City's Sign Code (Section 4.20). 4. s approval subject to a her state, federal, and local ordinances, regulations, or laws with a hority over this dev lopment. 2. Informal Public Hearing — Preliminary PUD Plan — Struther's Parkinson's Center— 6701 Country Club Drive — PU-39, Amendment#4 Applicant: Park Nicollet Address: 6701 Country Club Drive Purpose: To allow a building addition approximately 2,700 square feet in size and the construction of an outdoor memory care walk/garden. Goellner referred to a site plan of the property and explained the applicant's request to amend their existing PUD permit to allow for a building addition and the construction of an outdoor movement/therapy garden. She stated that the proposed addition would be approximately 2,700 square feet in size and would be used as a gathering space and for expanded education, rehabilitation and training capabilities. She added that the Applicant is also proposing to create an indoor/outdoor movement therapy garden with enhanced landscaping and artwork. Goellner discussed the proposed parking on the site and stated that there are currently 181 parking spaces plus 24 proof of parking spaces at 6681 Country Club Drive. She stated that the City Code requires 158 parking spaces for clinic and office uses. After the parking area is reduced to allow for the new landscaping, there will be 160 parking spaces within the PUD which includes the property at 6681 Country Club Drive. She added that there will be a shared parking agreement and an access easement between the two property owners. Goellner stated that staff is recommending approval of the Preliminary PUD amendment plan subject to the findings and conditions recommended by Staff. Kluchka asked what "proof of parking" means. Goellner stated that it means there is space for parking available, but it is not constructed unless and until it is needed. Kluchka asked if the canopy referred to in the Fire Chief's staff report was for Struthers Parkinson's Center or for the office next door. Goellner stated that both buildings have a canopy. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission December 8, 2014 Page 4 Johnson asked for clarification that the parking will stay as is, and that no new parking spaces will be required. Goellner said yes, the proposal meets the parking requirements and that the proof of parking is not needed. Blum stated that there was a reciprocal shared parking agreement with the property next door that expired last year and asked if the City thinks the agreement is still needed. Goellner said yes and added that the property owners are working on updating that agreement. Kluchka asked if the lighting needs to be replaced. Goellner said she is not sure, but thinks the Applicant can address that issue. Rose Wichmann, Manager of the Struthers Parkinson's Center, explained that the proposed addition will be on the northwest side of the building and will give them more education space. The west side of the building will be an interior corridor they will use for rehab services and the indoor/outdoor memorial garden. She referred to the shared parking agreement and stated that the attorneys for the two properties have updated it, so it will remain in place. She submitted a letter from the attorneys clarifying that the easement rights are perpetual. She stated that they have been doing hourly parking counts to make sure they will have adequate parking. They currently have between 32 and 57 open spaces in the parking lot, so taking 16 to 18 spaces for this project should still be enough to accommodate both businesses. Baker asked Wichmann how long they have been doing the traffic counts. Wichmann said they've been doing the counts for the last month or so. Baker asked if their traffic is seasonal. Wichmann explained that Struthers Parkinson's Center is first and foremost a clinic and that traffic stays pretty much the same year-round. She added that they do educational programming conferences as well and they will still be able to accommodate that additional parking. Blum asked if there is ever a need for emergency medical transport. Wichmann said it would be extremely rare, but if they did have an emergency they would use the 911 system. Kluchka opened the public hearing. Hearing and seeing no one wishing to comment, Kluchka closed the public hearing. Baker said he thinks the parking issue needed the most attention and that it has been discussed satisfactorily. Waldhauser asked how far along the Applicant is with their tree preservation plan. Goellner said the tree preservation plan will be done as part of the Final PUD process. Waldhauser said she was surprised to see that the Applicant isn't planning for shade trees along the building and walkway and she hopes that they will. Kluchka said he wants a condition added that a design review will be done during the Final PUD review process. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission December 8, 2014 Page 5 Johnson asked if the Applicant is working with the City regarding stormwater issues. Goellner said yes. Waldhauser noted that the condition regarding shared parking can be modified since the City now knows that the existing parking agreement will stay in place. MOVED by Waldhauser, seconded by Cera and motion carried unanimously recommend approval of the Preliminary Plan for Struthers Parkinson's Center PUD No. 39, Amendment No. 4, subject to the following findings and conditions: Findings: 1. The PUD plan is tailored to the specific characteristics of the site and achieves a higher quality of site planning and design than generally expected under conventional provisions of the ordinance. 2. The PUD plan preserves and protects substantial desirable portions of the site's characteristics, open space and sensitive environmental features including steep slopes, trees, scenic views, creeks, wetlands, and open waters. 3. The PUD plan includes efficient and effective use (which includes preservation) of the land. 4. The PUD Plan results in development compatible with adjacent uses and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and redevelopment plans and goals. 5. The PUD plan is consistent with preserving and improving the general health, safety and general welfare of the people of the City. 6. The PUD plan meets the PUD Intent and Purpose provision and all other PUD ordinance provisions. Conditions: 1. The plans prepared by EAPC architects and submitted with the application on November 7, 2014, shall become a part of this approval. 2. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Fire Department to Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager, dated December 1, 2014, shall become a part of this approval. 3. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Engineering Division to Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager, dated December 1, 2014, shall become a part of this approval. 4. A shared parking agreement shall be confirmed or enacted upon or before Final PUD approval. 5. The Applicant shall submit a lighting plan that meets the requirements of the City's Outdoor Lighting Code (Section 11.73). 6. All signage must meet the requirements of the City's Sign Code (Section 4.20). 7. This approval is subject to all other state, federal, and local ordinances, regulations, or laws with authority over this development. 8. A final design plan shall be reviewed by the City prior to Final Plan approval. city 0f goldenM E M 0 R A I z� t valley ll Planning Department 763-593-8095/763-593-8109(fax) Date: December 8, 2014 To: Golden Valley Planning Commission From: Emily Goellner, Associate Planner/Grant Writer Subject: Informal Public Hearing— Preliminary PUD Plan for Struthers Parkinson's Center PUD No. 39, Amendment #4 — 6701 & 6681 Country Club Drive— Park Nicollet Methodist Hospital, Applicant Background Park Nicollet Methodist Hospital, owner of Struthers Parkinson's Center at 6701 Country Club Drive, is requesting an amendment to PUD No. 39. The properties in PUD No. 39 are zoned "Institutional (1-3)" and guided for long-term office use on the General Land Use Plan map. The total area for the PUD is 4.8 acres. The PUD is bounded by Country Club Drive to the north and trunk highway 55 to the south. PUD No. 39 was established in 1983 to build an outpatient surgical center at 6701 Country Club Drive (current site of Struthers Parkinson's Center). A year later, the PUD was amended to permit business and professional office uses in the medical clinic at 6681 Country Club Drive (current site of Gurstel Chargo law office). A second amendment was approved in 2000 to allow an 8,550 square foot building addition to the south side of Struthers Parkinson's Center. Since some parking spaces were removed for the addition, the City approved the plan with the condition that the City Manager may require the construction of the "proof of parking" area in the future. A third amendment was applied for but withdrawn by the applicant. Summary of Proposal The proposed PUD amendment would allow the Applicant, Park Nicollet Methodist Hospital, to expand the Struthers Parkinson's Center. The proposed building addition would increase the footprint by 2,680 square feet from 15,292 square feet to 17,972 square feet. The building expansion would require a reduction in the size of the parking area and in the number of parking spaces. A portion of the building, totaling 7,825 square feet, would be remodeled as part of this project. The additions and renovations would relocate and expand rehabilitation program services, create a gathering space, expand education and training capabilities, and create an indoor/outdoor movement therapy garden with enhanced landscaping and artwork. nro Y fl#i f a � v s "�• _ t i s �.z 04 V NO4 y, ¢ F , At i - e t PUD 39 - Site Map Enhanced Walkways The Applicant intends to build a walkway across the property that connects clients to two sitting and activity areas on the north and south sides of the property. The walkway would cross the parking lot to connect to the movement therapy garden walkway adjacent to the eastern side of the building. The walkway would expand exercise and wellness programming space while providing nature-based space that can be inspirational for clients. To incorporate the walkway into the site, several parking spaces on the east side of the building and one space on the north side would be removed. Landscaping&Tree Preservation The City Code allows the applicant to remove up to 17.7 significant trees from the site. The site plan shows the removal of 9 trees, of which 3 are significant. The walkway would be constructed in an attempt to avoid significant trees because the trees are an important component to the walkway. Several deciduous trees, shrubs, and perennials would be planted. As stated in the memorandum from the Engineering staff, the City Forester will review the plans in more detail to determine whether a tree preservation permit is required and if additional information is needed before submittal of the Final PUD plans. The applicant must also provide a cost estimate for the landscaping, which will determine the financial security that will be held by the City for two growing seasons. Summary of Parking Calculations Parking Spaces i 6701 Country Club Dr. 6681 Country Club Dr. ; PUD No. 39 i _ (Struthers) ; (Gurstel Chargo) Existing_ 99 82 181 Existing Proof 0 24 24 Required 70 88 158 Proposed 80 80 160 Shortage/Overage +10 -8 +2 Proposed Future 0 35 35 Parking Area Parking Analysis Under the Zoning Code, offices and clinics have different minimum parking requirements. The requirements are based on the gross floor area of the building. The parking requirements are calculated as follows: 6701 Country Club Drive: Medical clinic: 1 space per 200 square feet of gross floor area Proposed gross floor area: 12,981 square feet 12,981/200 = 64.91 = 65 parking spaces Adult Day Care: 1 space per 5 persons 25 persons/5 = 5 parking spaces 65 +5 = 70 parking spaces required Since a portion of Struthers Parkinson's Center would be an adult day care, the parking regulations are different for that portion of the building, which occupies 4,991 square feet. For every 5 persons cared for, 1 parking space is required. Since 25 persons are cared for, 5 parking spaces are required. With the 65 spaces required for the clinic, there are a total of 70 parking spaces required for Struthers Parkinson's Center. 6681 Country Club Drive: Office: 1 space per 250 square feet of gross floor area Proposed gross floor area: 21,960 square feet 21,960/250 = 87.84 =88 parking spaces Combining both properties, 158 parking spaces are required for the entire PUD site. The applicant proposes that 160 spaces be provided with 35 spaces designated as proposed areas of parking for any future need. Shared Parking Between the two buildings, there are 35 parking spaces that are easily accessible to both buildings. While these spaces are located on the property at 6681 Country Club Drive, the spaces have been used by both property owners since the PUD was created. A "Reciprocal Easement Agreement" was required to be executed as a condition of approval of PUD No. 39 in 1983. It was enacted on April 20, 1983 for a term of 30 years. It was automatically terminated on April 20, 2013. Engineering As is standard practice for development proposals, plans for this proposal were reviewed by the City's Engineering Division to ensure the site can be adequately served by public utilities and that traffic issues are resolved. A memorandum from the Engineering Division that addresses traffic management, sanitary sewer and water services, stormwater management, and tree preservation and landscaping is attached. Fire Safety The Fire Department reviewed this proposal to ensure that an adequate water supply is provided and that adequate emergency vehicle access is achieved on the site. A memorandum from the Fire Department that addresses emergency vehicle access is attached. The memorandum also states that the clearance height of the drive canopies need to be identified and appropriate signage must be installed. Building Materials The new addition will consist primarily of brick and glass. The accent brick will match the existing fagade material. Lighting Plan The Applicant has been asked to submit a lighting plan which will be reviewed for compliance with the City's Outdoor Lighting ordinance prior to Final Plan approval. Justification for Consideration as a PUD The PUD process is an optional method of regulating land use in order to permit flexibility in uses allowed, setbacks, height, parking requirements, and number of buildings on a lot. The City has previously determined that this PUD meets the standards established in the City Code; Staff believes that this application to amend the PUD is also consistent with these standards: • Achieves a high quality of site planning, design, landscaping, and building materials which are compatible with the existing and planned land uses. • Encourages creativity and flexibility in land development. • Encourage efficient and effective use of land, open space, streets, utilities, and other public facilities. • Encourage development in transitional areas which achieve compatibility with all adjacent and nearby land uses. • Achieve development consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. • Achieve development consistent with the City's redevelopment plans and goals. In order to be approved as a PUD, the City must be able to make the following findings: 1. Quality Site Planning. The PUD plan is tailored to the specific characteristics of the site and achieves a higher quality of site planning and design than generally expected under conventional provisions of the ordinance. 2. Preservation. The PUD plan preserves and protects substantial desirable portions of the site's characteristics, open space and sensitive environmental features including steep slopes, trees, scenic views, creeks, wetlands, and open waters. 3. Efficient— Effective. The PUD plan includes efficient and effective use (which includes preservation) of the land. 4. Compatibility. The PUD Plan results in development compatible with adjacent uses and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and redevelopment plans and goals. 5. General Health. The PUD plan is consistent with preserving and improving the general health, safety and general welfare of the people of the City. 6. Meets Requirements. The PUD plan meets the PUD Intent and Purpose provision and all other PUD ordinance provisions. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the Preliminary Plan for Struthers Parkinson's Center PUD No. 39, Amendment No. 4, subject to the following conditions: 1. The plans prepared by EAPC architects and submitted with the application on November 7, 2014, shall become a part of this approval. 2. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Fire Department to Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager, dated December 1, 2014, shall become a part of this approval. 3. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Engineering Division to Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager, dated December 1, 2014, shall become a part of this approval. 4. A shared parking agreement shall be enacted upon or before Final PUD approval. 5. The Applicant shall submit a lighting plan that meets the requirements of the City's Outdoor Lighting Code (Section 11.73). 6. All signage must meet the requirements of the City's Sign Code (Section 4.20). 7. This approval is subject to all other state, federal, and local ordinances, regulations, or laws with authority over this development. Attachments Location Map (1 page) Memo from the Fire Department dated December 1, 2014 (1 page) Memo from the Engineering Division dated December 1, 2014 (12 pages) Master Facility Plan (10 pages) Site Plans (19 pages) Landscape Plans (3 pages) Survey (1 page) T d 'l-I valley Fire Department 763-593-8079/763-593-8098 (fax) Date: December 1, 2014 To: Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager From: John Crelly, Fire Chief Subject: Preliminary PUD #39, Amendment 4, 6681/6701 Country Club Drive—Struthers Parkinson's Center The Golden Valley Fire Department has reviewed the preliminary PUD plans submitted on November 7, 2014 for 6681/6701 Country Club Drive —Struthers Parkinson's Center. This PUD Amendment proposes an expansion of the parking lot for 6681 Country Club Drive and adding walking paths and gardens on the 6701 Country Club Drive site. Overall the proposal for additional parking for the 6681 Country Club building appears to be designed with adequate drive lane width and turning radius to allow for proper movement of a large fire truck on the east side of the building. Please note: the drive canopy on the west side of this building needs to be identified as to the clearance height and have appropriate signage installed. The 6701 Country Club site has no proposed drive access changes. The current drive lane width, turning radius and 360 degree access around the building is adequate for proper movement of a large fire truck. If you have any questions, please contact me at 763-593-8065 or by e-mail, jcrelly@goldenvalleymn.gov City0fgo1denI*v4v ^ MEMORANDUM valley Public Works Department J 763-593-8030/763-593-3988(fax) Date: December 1, 2014 To: /son Zimmerman, Planning Manager From: Jeff Oliver, PE, City Engineer Eric Eckman, Public Works Specialists -°+ Subject: Struthers Parkinson's Center- PUD 39, Amendment 4 Preliminary PUD Review Engineering staff has reviewed the plans for the proposed renovation and expansion of the Park Nicollet Struthers Parkinson's Center located at 6701 Country Club Drive. This memorandum discusses the issues identified during the Engineering review that must be addressed prior to final PUD plan submittal. The comments contained within this review are based on the plans submitted to the City on November 7, 2014. Site Plan PUD number 39 consists of two properties: 1) the Struthers Parkinson's Center on the west side of the PUD, and 2) an office building on the east side. Each property has its own parking facilities and there is also a shared parking area located near the boundary between the properties. There is a "proof of parking" area identified on the eastern parcel, immediately south of the existing parking lot on the east side of the office building, if there is demand for additional parking within the PUD. The plans for Amendment 4 pertain only to the Struthers Parkinson's Center property and do not include construction of the proof of parking area at this time. The proposed plans include an interior renovation, construction of an addition on the east side of the building, and construction of a therapy garden with walkways and landscaping improvements throughout the site. Plans include the removal of 16 parking spaces on the east side of the building in order to accommodate the building addition and construction of the therapy garden. The plans include a base bid and alternate bids to allow for phasing of the exterior site improvements over time. For the purposes of this review, all work shown in the plans (base bid plus alternates 1-3) is being treated as one project, and therefore the entire plan set is discussed in this review. G:\Developments-Private\Struthers Parkinsons Center\2014 PUD Amend ment\Preliminary PUD review_struthers_120114.docx If portions of the proposed site improvements are constructed at a later date, separate permits will be required before each phase of construction can begin. The future phases will be subject to the rules and requirements of the City and all other review agencies at the time of construction. A demolition permit, stormwater management permit, tree preservation permit, utility permits, and other permits deemed necessary by the City must be obtained before any demolition or site work can begin. This PUD is adjacent to State Highway 55 and therefore, the plans are subject to the review of the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT). Utilities (Water and Sanitary Sewer) There are no changes proposed to the existing water and sanitary sewer services for this property. However, the water and fire protection systems serving this development are subject to the review of the Golden Valley Fire Chief. The City has an Inflow and Infiltration (1/1) Ordinance to help reduce the amount of clear water entering into the sanitary sewer system. This PUD is subject to the City's 1/1 Ordinance. City records show that 6701 Country Club Drive (Struthers Parkinson's Center) is not compliant with the ordinance. Therefore, an inspection of the sewer service must be completed by the City to determine its condition. The owner must perform any repairs deemed necessary and obtain a Certificate of Inflow and Infiltration Compliance, or enter into an 1/1 Deposit Agreement with the City for the repairs, prior to final PUD approval. A Certificate of Compliance must be obtained prior to occupancy of the building. Stormwater Management This proposed PUD amendment is within the Sweeney Lake sub-watershed of the Bassett Creek Watershed and is therefore subject to the review and comment of the Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission (BCWMC). The BCWMC will review the plans for compliance with its water quality policies. Sweeney Lake is listed as an impaired water for nutrients (phosphorus) by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). In order to address the impairment, the BCWMC and MPCA completed a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Study for the lake, which was approved in 2011. Review by the City and BCMWC will include an evaluation for compliance with the TMDL Study. According to the City's records, the Struthers Parkinson Center was expanded in 2000. The total disturbed area of the project was just below the BCWMC threshold for requiring water quality improvements. The development in 2000 was approved with the condition that, when the Struthers Parkinson Center further develops, or if the proof of parking area on the eastern parcel is constructed, water quality improvements for the entire site must be constructed. The plans submitted by the developer include the construction of an underground filtration/infiltration system to capture and treat stormwater runoff from the site. Upon its initial G:\Developments-Private\Struthers Parkinsons Center\2014 PUD Amendment\Preliminary PUD review_struthers_120114.dou review, staff had concerns that portions of the site were not being routed through the treatment system. Some of the areas without treatment include the roof and the bid alternates (future construction phases) on the north side of the property. Since its initial review, staff has had additional discussion with the developer regarding the stormwater design and the developer has assured staff that revisions are being made that will address these concerns. The changes will be reflected in the final PUD plans. All existing and proposed storm sewer and stormwater treatment facilities that are part of this development will be owned and maintained by the property owner. The owner will be required to enter into a Maintenance Agreement with the City to ensure the proper long-term maintenance and operation of the facilities. In addition to the review of the BCWMC, this PUD is also subject to the City's Stormwater Management Ordinance. The City must approve the stormwater management plan prior to submittal to the BCWMC. A City stormwater management permit must be obtained before building permits are issued and before any site work can begin. The stormwater management permit must include a plan meeting City standards, including all temporary and permanent erosion control best management practices. This PUD is also subject to the MPCA's Construction Stormwater Permit. A copy of this permit and the corresponding Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan must be submitted to the City, prior to issuance of any permits to begin work on site. Tree Preservation / Landscape Plan This PUD amendment is subject to the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance and Minimum Landscape Standards. A Tree Preservation Plan and a Landscape Plan were included in the plan submittal. The City Forester will review the plans in more detail to determine if a tree preservation permit is required and if additional information is needed, before submittal of final PUD plans. In addition, the owner must submit to the City an estimate of the cost to furnish and install the landscape plant materials shown in the plans. This cost estimate will be used to determine the financial security which is held as a guarantee that the landscaping will survive the two-year warranty period. Summary and Recommendations Engineering staff recommends approval of the preliminary PUD plans for the Struthers Parkinson Center renovation and expansion subject to the comments contained in this review, which are summarized as follows: 1. A demolition permit, stormwater management permit, tree preservation permit, utility permits, and other permits deemed necessary by the City must be obtained before any demolition or site work can begin. GADevelopments-Private\Struthers Parkinsons Center\2014 PUD Amendment\Preliminary PUD review_struthers_120114.docx 2. The sanitary sewer service must be compliant with the City's 1/1 Ordinance prior to occupancy of the building, as discussed in this review. 3. The stormwater plans will be revised as discussed in this review. 4. The owner will be required to enter into a Maintenance Agreement with the City to ensure the proper long-term maintenance and operation of the stormwater treatment facilities. 5. The owner must obtain a City Stormwater Management Permit prior to construction. 6. The City Forester will review the Tree Preservation and Landscape Plans in more detail to determine if additional information is required prior to submittal of final PUD Plans. 7. The Developer must submit an estimate of the cost to furnish and install the landscape plant materials shown in the plans, as discussed in this review. 8. Plans are subject to the review of the BCWMC, MnDOT, and MPCA, as discussed in this review. Approval is also subject to the comments of the City Attorney, other City staff, and other review agencies. Please feel free to call me if you have any questions regarding this matter. C: Tom Burt, City Manager Marc Nevinski, Physical Development Director John Crelly, Fire Chief Jerry Frevel, Building Official Bert Tracy, Public Works Maintenance Manager Al Lundstrom, Park Maintenance Supervisor and City Forester Kelley Janes, Utilities Supervisor Tom Hoffman, Water Resources Technician GADevelopments-Private\Struthers Parkinsons Center\2014 PUD Amendment\Preliminary PUD review_struthers_120114.docx FaegreBD.com FAEG E L./WR USA•UK•CHINA CMIELS Tory L.Jackson Faegre Baker Daniels LLP +1612 766 7560 2200 Wells Fargo Center.90 South Seventh Street tory.jackson@FaegreBD.com Minneapolis.Minnesota 55402-3901 Phone+1612 766 7000 Fax+1612 766 1600 December 8, 2014 Park Nicollet Methodist Hospital 3800 Park Nicollet Boulevard St. Louis Park, MN 55406 Attn: Duane Spiegle Re: Struthers Parkinson Center—Status of Reciprocal Easement Declaration Dear Duane: I understand that the City of Golden Valley has asked for clarification regarding the status of that certain Reciprocal Easement Declaration(the "Declaration') between Park Nicollet Methodist Hospital (as successor-in-interest to A.M.I. Ambulatory Centers, Inc.) and Gurstel Chargo, P.A. (as successor-in-interest to Country Club Surgical Associates Limited Partnership), dated April 20, 1983 and recorded May 26, 1983 in the Office of the Registrar of Titles of Hennepin County as Document No. 4795752, and in the Office of the County Recorder of Hennepin County as Document No. 1515530. Pursuant to Section 11 of the Declaration, the easement rights granted therein are perpetual and remain in full force and effect between the respective property owners,notwithstanding that certain other provisions of the Declaration have expired. Let me know if you have further questions. Sincerely, Tory Jackson US.55337517.02 ate �� i s �n �� `! E�G+S �I• y ;� ,,. i ,ti... a . SEP 12 201�i ■ . � `..■.,. � .� tea, ,, ;..,y ,■ `f s a 4 w i, R�h F E �u vie s ar en ......------ : -. _ e „Y Y 4 F ,F r r Of'. ; t pp- 74 4 �s �l i x e i ' x !f — T y i } Evelyn Struthers � �i�i :� ' tyii 1916-2013 � a The Gift of Heart and Soul Evelyn and her family, along with . center leaders, dreamed of a world- lip Eel class, free-standing facility focusing M ICU . �. { on people with Parkinson's disease To honor the memory of Evelyn Struthers and the Struthers family legacy, to incorporate their love of nature and and their families. Tfulfill this beauty and providing hope and inspiration to others. dream, the Strutherss family became By creatinga nature based movement the major donors for the new facility therapy garden and expanding education, therapy and patient program in Golden Valley. areas, we are able to continue to lead program innovations that truly help people live well with Parkinson's disease. Goals/Priorities Struthers Parkinson's Center opened r 1. Create an Indoor/outdoor movement therapy space that is beautifully landscaped, enhances the Center, in late 1995. Evelyn was a tireless Provides hope, inspiration, and opportunities for patients to learn and practice important therapies.at the center and would regularly say, "If there is one little = thing I can y, for someone else on The space will have both indoor and outdoor components allowing four season use and include the following therapeutic practice opportunities: ! ' earth while I'm alive, then I want to • Steps, ramps, inclines do it," and "If someone is glad you're • Indoor/Outdoor path/trail that is safe for patients Alan Struthers was diagnosed with here, then your life has meaning." • Incorporates natural light and beautiful plantings Parkinson's disease in 1986, Many visitors to the center knew • Includes tables and benches sending him, and his wife, Evelyn, her only as their favorite volunteer, . Provides access to nature on a search for ways to meet the "Evie," and had no idea that she was . Artwork that inspires physical and emotional challenges the leader who made it possible for ahead. They found little help until this unique center to be created. 2. Expand the education, training and support capabilities of the Center. meeting Paul Silverstein, MD, and Evelyn also served as an active • Expand the education/resource room to accommodate larger group sizes and multiple groups his team of specialists at Methodist member of the center's Community • Incorporate a folded wall for flexible use of space Hospital Parkinson's Center. Advisory Board until her passing in • Include an easy entrance to minimize program interruption 2013. Her children, grandchildren Evelyn immersed herself in helping and extended family carry on the 3. Gathering and Hallway space Alan and others facing Parkinson's. tradition of leadership, volunteerism • Create an entry for easy and direct access to education and exercise spaces In 1989, Evelyn and Alan funded a and support. • Promotes community by providing areas for patients to gather before and after classes, support groups pilot program that provided respite and exercise programs day care for Parkinson's patients. • Provides a calm and inspirational setting for patients attending all day assessment appointments There was such a strong demand "Evelyn Struthers has left for this program that they provided a legacy of inspiration and 4. Rehab programming re-location and expansion the primary financial support to • Relocate the rehab exam rooms closer to exercise and movement therapy areas for better patient access leadership and remains • Expand spaces to allow us to provide innovative programming for patients i.e. Dynavision, driving simulator establish what is now known as p Club CREATE (Center for Research, the heart and soul of Park and GAITRite mat program Education, Artistic and Therapeutic Nicollet Struthers • Soundproof spaces used by speech therapy and music therapy Endeavors). Formed through a partnership between Parkinson's Parkinson's Center." S. Parking Center staff and members of the • Create additional parking spaces for the adjoining business on their property in order to add the therapy Parkinson's community, the CREATE garden and building addition. program is innovative and enhances participants' quality of life. 6. Philanthropy and engagement opportunities • Provide opportunities for future patient and family tributes, a garden brick program and expanded By the time Alan died in 1995, engagement at the Center Parkinson's Center had outgrown its space inside Methodist Hospital. rr EAPC • 1 111 . '' 1111 `1 1 :111 �1 PROJECT let's honor the past and celebrate the future... "Our gifts underscore our family's appreciation for the creative, visionary and dedicated staff who make the Center a truly unique place . • GOALSfor those who turn to it for their care, support and inspiration. The passion, spirit and commitment of these dedicated individuals reflects our own values, and we're very pleased to work with and to encourage them in this effort." - Evelyn Struthers • • I A IWP- b. Create a nature based and inspirational indoor/outdoor ' movement therapy garden walkway and expand exercise and wellness j# programming space NKJ Rehab therapy re-location and expansion Gathering and Community Room /' Ooor r K ti s r EAPC • tee-o r SftV&= .111 :1 Master Facility Plan • • Rain Garden , P.OJECT FINALE education,Community Roomfor edu cat on, training, support groups and u/" ( activities Indoor Movement Therapy Walkway ;.. i Gathering Area - Silent Water Feature, !� Path Walkway Live Wall System Bench/Wheelchair Parking Scattered Boulder Accents y ' r Super-graphic Nature Based Wall01 MEN1111 i ".. Bench/Wheelchair Parking Scattered Boulder Accents ---«Water/Bird Bath/Sculpture Bench/Wheelchair Parking Sliding Window System With Screen Patient Staff . Indoor Landscaping Beds rEAPGFLOOR P • .0._,-EC fs �,EE�t 0 20' 40' F- Ra&Niiadef RENOVATION: 3900 SF +- ctnta Offices Therapist Office Speech Therapy Office/ExamMaster Facility , Music Therapy Office Relaxation Classroom Plan Site Plan • Art and Horticulture Classroom Music Therapy Classroom PPOJECT FINALE Rehabilitation Studio Occupational Therapy _ Rehab Treatment Treatment/Exam .... 1_.p ADDITION: 2750 SF +- Community Room Patient/Family Gathering Space u Indoor Movement Therapy Walkway Zrw g r EXTERIOR LANDSCAPING: 5100 SF Outdoor Movement Therapy Garden/Walkway Outdoor Benches Water Feature 4 ---� Landscape Beds Rain Gardens Therapeutic Node/Activity Pads - — -- � RP ..i 2.®lRulu N.•.'rKh 1e++ta r EAPG 0 20' 40' RENOVATION PLAN W J � z n- LQ U � o 4-J C� z U Cl- ON Q 4--Jo (n U) Z z 490 A . pp ��. � � "gyp n? yr ti#S.�"j4•.�� ..� r ��/'e«"�a 3 k v yar Y i v 'a.. dAlF 41 • rw. N • �,.��,,rr r r ., e y t 1 f i ..a i w t#'i - , '� _ ti.7� L iiLAi�JDVJi��Z'rl� vWiWit # t � Master Facility t Pan & Site Plan 28JUNE2074 PROJECT FINALE uc 14 : , � • tti ♦ L ,i , S' s ,« 1 .'.•� m j 6 a, • •..•, a y,.- Imo— S ,. p 7;t a t A . SITE PLAN W J Q .. - LUj 4--J . U o W � . a � (f06 + � � W O 4--j N -J U) _Q W IR E` Yr . a'l K' j1 I. w f.- a s � m n f < '. RA a i 'gyp a♦ x k � � �� � � �� � ♦ Yore t 1' NX Ay{ y.'irit Ilk *sIc r � jelk \ �5 � � y � +4 'Ii'� � ♦i�a�'� W W J > c Z C6 U W n w a �,a• -� CL a M LU 06 o N � Cf) Lij LU Z LU ro X N WLLJ ir a- Gj � p t ty s +. w , r F. ! ark 1w r � r v x r 2 Ci. � �yy��FFy•fir y91� �R r +: n 4, F ti Iv OF '" W I •T .j . x q� t ; i !s k At Aq• i �- 't - k kit -, y f t -. it i I Oil, t IV TVT yy • 6 w 9 { r. 8 l � x , 4 a Park Nicollet Struthers Parkinson's Center �Mrj. EARC Expansion & Renovation =®® GOLDEN VALLEY, MINNESOTA i-701-256.3116 cea M1.223.79"118 W Mein Aw,Suft A,Bt m r&ND 58501 LIST OF DRAWINGS TWIN CITIES MAP PROJECT LOCATION MAP No Ye.AROVro 6701 Country Club Drive, Golden Valley, MN www.eapc-net GENERAL sz 10 _ v ries Coon 0001 TITLE SHEETCkcle'^ �y !'* Osseo Rapils Mn„nds "" V&n vom Oaks LIFE SAFETY >,�,r Brooklyn Ff,rzl� v.er �uwtt,r$ Cerr:uan ' LS201 MAIN LEVEL LIFE SAFETY PLAN PAaple Par« shnreo,eW Bear Labe Br© trn �- y NOV 0 7 2014 vrove 1, Center W.' N�hv W3.�R�,s Btq�F+,n Hel¢hls CIVIL C1.0 DEMOLITION PLAN BASE BID sr.0 mwr{ _„ CIA DEMOLITION PLAN ALTERNATE NO.I&3 °' F'lymcuzr, val eey RDsp, F,.,1 C1.2 DEMOLITION PLAN ALTERNATE NO.2 ; ' Minneapolis 10 #}�. ° CLIENT '.il�T•9 V1'ay T.i'9 C2.0 PAVING PLAN BASE BID ' PARK NICOLLET C2.1 PAVING PLAN ALTERNATE NO.I&3S 169 52 St Paerl MaF,eA�:�r, rl.pc:is STRUTHERS C2.2 PAVING PLAN ALTERNATE NO.2 ` 'i n•. C e{,n+rer. t��tx,3is park vvr r PARKINSON'S C3.0 GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN BASE BID 5sarw ,a %f metorkast ra,i CENTER C3.1 GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN ALTERNATE NO.1$3 Mei"=r" S-7,cn E:��na ` "" Heu^.+s C3.2 GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN ALTERNATE NO.2 4 } ; - PROJECT DESCRIPTION C4.0 UTILITY PLAN BASE BIDC5 DETAILS Eder,P ame ® " EXPANSION& y, C6 STORM WATER DETAILS Inver�t oe stPBu1 t a.w t. RENOVATION T1.0 TREE PRESERVATION PLAN &haMoce r 169 Ea dart LANDSCAPE Savage Nat'O" aec.e „ :.. ����.,.,–•- PROJECT LOCATION Cm GOLDEN VALLEY L6.0 TREE PRESERVATION PLAN STATE MINNESOTA ARCHITECTURAL r -� - e �a» 702 A101 MAIN LEVEL DEMOLITION PLAN 111 ISSUE DATES — A201 MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A401 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS N PAP.UD.APPMATION 11A62014 ATARI(I OESCWPiIOH DATE PROJECT NO: 201441 DO DRAWN BY: RGH CHECKED BY: RK COPYRIGHT: Y DRAWING TITLE TITLE SHEET g 0001 LIFE SAFETY LEGEND: CODE ANALYSIS —•—•—•— 1 HOUR FIRE/SMOKE BARRIER CODES: MINNESOTA STATE BUILDING CODE rrr.tEAPC: INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE(IBC) 2012 ------- SMOKE PARTITION ANSI A117.1 2003 ED 2003 NFPA 101 LIFE SAFETY CODE 2012 1E-.-.-� .... ...... ..... .... 32 EXIT,CLEAR WIDTH IN INCHES INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE(IFC) 2012 ®®® ____ __ INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL CODE(IMC) 2012 ®®® EXAM j I EXAM EXAM EXAM EXAM OFFICE I i -� --x Z EXIT SIGN,ILLUMINATED INTERNATIONAL FUEL&GAS CODE(IFGC)2012 I 1-101 _ TRAVEL DISTANCE TO EXIT 1 I =100'Hi' NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE(NEC) 2012 1 I I i TELE 701.258.3116 FM 701.223.7993 VEST I 1 �.J h1p2 ZONING CLASSIFICATION: PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT(PU.D.) 118W Main Ave,StAWA,&muck NO 58601 '4/I CORJLOBBY I NO.79(1-3)SUB-DISTRICT(CLINIC) L L------------ ------------- R01-__-_____--}- __- _130'�f------ I W NO Mhd ND NS VT PLUMBING FIXTURES M14 MN I Bw•w u..ARD 1 I I 1 I OCCUPANCY GROUP(MIXED USE): B BUSINESS-GJNIC OUTPATIENT 1 41 I 1 I WC LAV. OF JAN. SCALE MEDS - ENTRY 1-4 INSTITUTIONALINSTITUTIONAL-ADULT DAY CARE pLCovE I EDUCATION I OCCUPANT REO. PROV.REO. PROV. REQ. PROV. REO. PROV. 1 I I ROOM CROUP B: CLINIC OUTPATIENT www.eapc.net I EXANv I i I-105 � 1 5 5 3 5 2 1 1 1 OCCUPANCY SEPARATION: PER TABLE 508.},}=SEPARATED OFFICE I RESEARCH RECEPTION I I I I-108 I 17B TOTAL OCCUPANT 6 I 1 1 Y ------�--e- --� 1 i GROUP 43 TOTAL OCCUPANULT TRB 3 3 7 2 1 0 1 1 OCCUPANT LOADS: PER TABLE 1004.1 I CONFERENCE I EXISTING GROUP B:(10,190 SF/tDO)=102 -°I PHOFFICE s 1-104 I �1 OFFICE 8 L�____= I I I SUMMARY OF FIXTURES 8 8 G 7 3 1 2 EDUCATION ROOM:(1,240 SF/20)= 62 I ExAAV COATS 1 I GATHERING SPACE(200 SF/15)= 14 I REBEARCH B OCCUPANCY DDPY 1 W , TOTAL GROUP B= 178 RESEARCH I Rte' GREETER I I GROOP I-4: (4.300 SF/4y= 43 OFFICE I -'j TOTAL OCCUPANT LOAD= 221 DIR. ____ IDE_1--___-<-_____� CONSTRUCTION TYPE TYPE II-B 1 . 1 GATHERING BUILDING SPRINKLERED: YES �.� iouEr TOILED SPACE ALLOWABLE AREA: GROUP B=23,000 SF h113 NORSE RESEARCH EF GROUP 1-4=13,000 SF OFFICE OFFICE STAFF ❑ AREA INCREASE FOR SPRINKLERS: (2) ROOM COORDINATORS (1) ! VENDING GROUP B: Is=300,69,000 SF CLAIM OFFICE RESEARCH GROUP 1-4:19=30Q 39,000 SF -. I_107FE COFFEE AREA INCREASE FOR FRONTAGE: F/P=1,W=30,I1=75 CLIENT GROUP 8: 69,000 SF GROUP 1-4:39,000 SF PARK NICOLLET CORR ."ET TOILET TOILET TOTAL ALLOWABLE AREA STRUTHERS GROUP B:23,000+17,250+69,000=109,250 SF h112 _ I_14�.- GROUP 1-4:13,000+9,750+39,000=61,750 SF PARKINSON'S CENTER OFFICE EL7HSK�',_ ACTUAL BUILDING AREA: EA1STING CHART / , ROOM/ CONFERENCE MEDICAL REHABILITATION MAIN LEVEL=14,490 GSF RECORDS � RAPi STUDIO �I'7L111"77LL "119 PENTHOUSE=802 GSF OFFICE OFFICE � APBlIl� PROJECT DESCRIPTION �M�S MEN'S h,16 117 r---, MAIN LEVEL=2680 GSF )FACE ! ! EXPANSION 84 FI-1-0 h15 •' •— INTERIOR REMODEL RENOVATION IF '1 PASSAGE - THEE MAIN LEVEL=7825 GSF E 1 I-118 WALKWAY ALLOWABLE BUILDING HEIGHT: GROUP B=75'/5 STORY ° - 1 I I-1211 GROUP I-4=75'/3 STORY TELE pRINKLENBK L J F R. L REHAB 1 ACTUAL HEIGHT/STORIES=15'/1 STORY COMM _,TREATMENT L___J ROOM SOB CORR 3!# fT OCCUPANCY SEPARATION: PER TABLE 5083.7=SEPARATED ZERO ELEC O + I-125 `y PROCESSING PANE REF G� "123 r-P KITCHEN "' EXIT TRAVEL DISTANCE PER SBC 1341.0442CrtYGOLDEN VALLEY ADL ° o GROUP 8 OCCUPANCY=300STATE MINNESOTA KITCHEN ! `+rI' (r%r r, CORR �_C-II _ CROUP I-4 OCCUPANCY=250 RECEIVING I h,22 ( �___--_-_1DE=51'{7' _--_-�- FIRE RESISTANCE RATING REOL4REMENTS FOR BUILDING ELEMENTS(IBC TABLE 601) DOCK F r---------4'--'- ----4a1 r---C--------- ----- I =h1. - -r+ I 01 CORR ISSUE DATES FE I 1 •—•—•—• I �'"�� f-------�-1�1 STRUCTURAL FRAME 0 HOUR ,FE 1 I _ BEARING WALLS(INTERIOR k EXTERIOR) 0 HOUR a w T T L 1 NON BEARING WALLS(INTERIOR&EXTERIOR) 0 HOUR I 1 x x `._ f.` FLOOR CONSTRUCTION D HOUR GT F� i I I (INCLUDING SUPPORTING BEAMS k JOISTS) ADL n L____-- 7DE=604' r-I OT I {- -----44 it I ROOF CONSTRUCTION 0 HOUR SPEECH 11� PORVEAB (INCLUDING SUPPORTING BEAMS&JOISTS) 4-.l p OFFICE/EXAMTHERAPY 1-127 OCCUPANCY ?L.Llf m UFE SAFETY FEATURES 1-127 _ _____ EQUIP FIRE ALARM THROUGHOUT-BATTERY BACKUP F' RETAIL L FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEM-SPRINKLERS THROUGH ENURE BUILDING ___; �♦ �_ C.R.EAT.E.DAY - STORAGE I FIRE EXTINGUISHERS THROUGHOUT PROGRAM I I F-1 22 �� EMERGENCY LIGHTS THROUGHOUT-BATTERY BACKUP EXERCISE EXIT LIGHTS THROUGHOUT-BATTERY BACKUP FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION MOVEMENT PA P.UD.APPUGITION 11At11R01{ -- L STUDIO NOTE ORIGINAL BUILDING WAS CONSTRUCTED UNDER 1983 UBC I - i H1J6 1997 ADDITION WAS CONSTRUCTED UNDER 1994 UBC MARK I OFSRIPIION 2000 ADDITION WAS CONSTRUCTED UNDER 1997 UBC MUSIC H y ART& 1II PARKING REQUIREMENTS: PROJECT NO: 20144100 THERAPYCLASSROOM -y CLASSROOM CLASSORTICULTURE ROOM ^ 6701 COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE: REWIREDPPARKINGKING STALLS=STALLS=957 DRAWN BY: RGH h133 I-134 I h135 1 GROUP 8 OCCUPANCY=52 CHECKED BY: RK -1 44 `- ! (1 SPACE PER 250 SF=i x 12,981/250) IV1 w a.=.aux=�mx=«.w.•a•.'.e ma�a=.:a a�. i 1 GROUP 1-4 OCCUPANCY=5COPYRIGHT:-ra» ^•Pwr sy Execs•a L---------- (1 SPACE PER S PERSONS CARED FOR=25/5) _ -e•.rnc•n a EaRc.E.sc a.. s PROPOSED PROOF OF PARKING,35+83=118 STALLS ..,•.�•+r..a m,.,..«a,y.:,:a.•�m. PROPOSED PARKING STALLS=79 `°0"'a1°'•"° I-4 OCCUPANCY SHADED PARKING OVERAGE=22 DRAWING TITTLE 6881 COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE: EXISTING PARKING STALLS=83 REWIRED PARKING STALLS=88 MAIN LEVEL LIFE GROUP B OCCUPANCY= SAFETY PLAN (1 SPACE PER 250 SF=1 x 21,960/250) PROPOSED PARKING STALLS=118 PARKING OVERAGE=30 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PROPFRTFC TOTAL EXISTING PARKING STALLS=182 8 REWIRED PARKING STALLS=145 PROPOSED PARKING STALLS-197 #! MAIN LEVEL LIFE SAFETY PLAN N LS201 r E A P C i i Y 1 �C�.•, G TELE 701.258.3116 FM 701.223.7983 116 W Main Ave Suite A,Bismarck ND 58501 �O �, -� 4�, _ lI l:A WilMmgdl�MN BueirosN tires ARG ffn (Na959'S7T 4d30 PLAT ..._.___.: "'' ,_•....,,-.._.4.:, �S YI i,. o^.�` -j.: lf r 1 t • ; Grant Forks ND I F­ND I Blsmarcx ND 589074 -. .."„v rvorairn vT s E ' COUNTRY -- I www.eapcnet -- �s= ;.i ! I 45.79 _ 1 6 07309 — 4 U =23192 IF Ir I i fNl939.5 4 SOPATL ', ,. F := _ g - zn CL ;B Rss7 DRIVE II ! i 589.0745"£, PlA�.. �:� - _ _-�(aPa3•r9•L. vJ PUTJ ,. - ♦.' lo'g"'. j Larson 45.57 u L-151.36 .R=2309.27 -� —= --_ •:�'_ '�. � - -- _ - � :i;:, ngln ng,Inc. x.-.:.-- - "•q O I,.i „f -S.i AS.__-. t.a. ' „ o ..__:�..... _ _ - •'! 3E524 Laboree Road :' .,�""T""�2_-•'re . L'>` '..�-� . _ - ;, Li....le. _yk' i'ar.•�•„ While Bear Lake,MN 55110 } i i 1 `,`:> j,:� .r-1 - T __ O Ic. _ ,'C-{•C 651.481.9120(f)651.481.9201 a _ ry �' � .� www.larsonengr.com r t NORTH 4Larson Engi erg Inc.All fights reserved. _ I `� ©201 ne r I hereby cenity That this plan specifications or reportwas pre area by me or under nn direct KEY PLAN supervision and that I am a duly licensed - Engineer un —T: 1 7- - r f •-� ,�" y" NOT TO SCALE der me laws of the stela r I f Minnesota Professional � I I ` 11 7G"!r '1, / Greg A Buchal,P.E. I / I{ Date'. Reg.No.: _ I � •` , ' `� �z I "' SYMBOL LEGEND ia r-.-.gt ; l REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING CLIENT •; ! I r,l ! .a i1 .�" {-j - _ „,,,k;,J ,;j{ BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SECTION ! FJ j �� a --- --- ----- PARK NICOLLET f ;E a �._ II> I� o - .'!'.%a�.• ` °y ... __ ... —_..._ ig - REMOVE AND DISPOSE SE EXISTING STRUTHERJ CONCRETE PAVEMENT SECTION PARKINSON'S x� CENTER ' t 1/ - GRASS REMOVAL LIMITS � SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR RESTORATION PROJECT DESCRIPTION �= I + ' ° KEY NOTES - EXPANSION 8L ,I `� r3 i,,t� i e'.•- r% }_ - + - RENOVATION -- - // 3 1 SAWCUT,REMOVE.AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING BITUMINOUS - ----- f- II PAVEMENT SECTION. e i f L' I r __ -- 1_ 6711w, �R SAWCUT,REMOVE,AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING CONCRETE <N _.1 ' �` PAVEMENT SECTION. ��.A 4 :i 1 :,,y: : __. _- .-.... fM O3 SAWCUT,REMOVE,AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING CONCRETE CURB ..• AND GUTTER. REMOVE AND SALVAGE EXISTING SIGN FOR OWNER CITY GOLDEN VALLEY REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING RETAINING WALL. STATE MINNESOTA .> : REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING BRICK PAVERS. Z I \ REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING PLANTER BOX REMOVE AND SALVAGE EXISTING RIP RAP FOR REUSE. a.- ISSUE DATES PROTECT EXISTINGDECK DURING DEMOLITION AND : -.:::-.__. - I O CONSTRUCTION. I I g /tl �^ S •�` . „.;, r __ 10 PROTECT EXISTING RAMP DURING DEMOLITION AND NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION. CONSTRUCTION �s a e r. 1 L p SIGN DEVELOPMENT 128 `y ) DE M i �' a t r 1 L d r' i .L z a- 11 r ' r L 1 - I _ 1. v all existing ty catwns. SCHEMATICOESIGN arov2oM SD 1 .. t ► r. I _ y NOTES .,u V , . . ... DEMOLITION entyautill o L« i , -_r'„" 2.It is the responsibility of the Contractor to perform or coordinate all FMARK DESCRIPTION DATE necessary utility demolitions and relocations from existing utility locations PROJECT NO: 12146144 to all onsite amenities and buildings These connections Include,but are not meted to water sanitary sewer,cable N,telephone,gas,electric,site DRAWN BY: PSM lighting,etc. CHECKED BY: GABIKRR — 3.Prior to beginning work.wntact Gopher Slate Onecall 651-054-0002)to — $0 locate utilities throughout the area under construction.The Contractor COPYRIGHT: 1 { 52W�1P9nr) shall retain the services of a private utility locator to locale the private Mm a S78'08,p.w 193. utilities. �J fsm 4. Sawcut along edges of pavements,sidewalks,and curbs to remain. ye1� Lip I � L_70.09 4, All construction shall be performed in accordance with stale and local DRAWING TITLE 8.11289.16 standard specifications for construction. 0'211 211 p,1r) r00`j2Y DEMOLITION PLAN BASE BID NORTH D 15 30 60 o� o(r) trr.T E A P C - ,=I I I� a4 r n 701 2583116 701 22379 TELE FAx ---_---- I � � 83 716 W Main Ave,Suite A,Bismarck NO 56501 (N89-59'57"E 48.50 PLAT) tj j` } � _ I COUNTRYmv - -----_ } __ ....._. S89 °07'45 "E + Jrt.L 1 -j wil-ry ND I e,»Bares-G_ B—ND 45. 79 CLUB ;. �—0 1 - 4 - ---- arson - Engineering,Inc. , — --- �Li x'71 3524 Labors Road While Bear Laile,MN 15110 �.. _. I (A=,34526' ,9201 L=151.43 _ ---—_r---- PLA L ----- I __- -- ----- — i - - - % © arson c . �_ '. �t __-...__._-_. .r___._. ..___.- _ b - -- NORTH $yhb8 reserved. , --...._1111,, � ©zot4L vnvE g8 orreO9�An I , , 45 4 ., -,- _ -, ' ---- ° ; -- .--- - enerebyport azarTy ma�nti Wan specfica�io asract / ..._....._..._._._—..__._._.-_. _.�_ - - _ sup.ry sionpand that I am a duty licensed ---------'t-- r LR=2,30,9. 27 -- O ---------- - 1 .. `-`'\; KEY PLA Pro essb ai Engineer under the laws of the late f — 1 5 1. �36 _ g _ n a z Q ., - ALTERNATE NO. 1-.____ "�; /` 2� • 2 NOT ro SCALE N of Mmneso a.n9 I ; - - -- rl� - - - - - . � -- — � - - - — 77 — \— 1 1 ��./\ \! T� .Tt+r _..—.—_a ._.. td7 Greg A.8uchal,P.E- I I t 1 - -- SYMBOL LEGEND t� - Reg.No.: J �7, -..; REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING Date: , i I ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦.Try .-� tf/-` BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SECTION ♦ ♦a -, :.�� . . :. 77 . PARK NICOLLET • i ^. ;, rrJ 1 REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING STRUTHERS O ' it , ' `� 'tT'-.t—,tea;' ; CONCRETE PAVEMENT SECTION N'S I1 -.... ,; - :rK' 7 :::: : : : :. .... CENTER 11 ~� 7" �'~ ` ♦;♦. ;♦. .. . ♦♦ ♦ .�T• + GRASS REMOVAL LIMITS ;;,I'1.♦.♦a♦.♦.♦.♦.♦♦♦♦ • •a• 1 I SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR RESTORATION �� •• ♦�.�.�.�.a♦♦aa♦ ♦a♦♦♦ ... 1 I PROJECT DESCRIPTION :: y, �i : I ' i::; KEY NOTES EXPANSION& . :4/1x' ... .�: ;.� I RENOVATION 0 SAWCUT,REMOVE,AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING BITUMINOUS ♦.fir• PAVEMENT SECTION. 1 . - . .... ... ... . .. . . . .... ... .... . rr-s.r4- TI __ _•��, •♦i.a .x� I O2 SAWCUT,REMOVE,AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING CONCRETE �. .. ..-n.♦'... # f. PAVEMENT SECTION. . . .'� . . _ . a a a. ` �,• :. ♦♦..♦. ♦♦.a.♦.♦. .♦♦: a... .._—s�sa.: .z� 3 SAWCUT,REMOVE,AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING CONCRETE CURB ...: ♦�.♦.♦ — — __-.-- - ._.. _. .._.__ _.... ._ '—�--=' — ___ _ ____—._ __ nii AND GUTTER. .a. a .� ss_a.�ess_ ;::. :♦.: -- _ — _ __-- �- _ �_ ___. O CITY GOLDEN VALLEY ' a♦ ♦;I . . ♦ ♦ I REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING TREE I, Fa♦♦♦♦ ♦♦♦♦.♦ :�� 1 ; I I I OS REMOVE AND RELOCATE EXISTING LIGHT POLE. srnrE MINNESOTA .:. __. I — — _ _ — — — PARING 16 PARKING SPACES I i I I — _4111i_0411111- 11111iI © PAINT EXIST NG STRIPING WITH BLACK PAINT TO MATCH SPA(ES EXISTING PAVEMENT. I I ISSUE DATES I DEMOLITION NOTES ' NOT FOR L Verify all existing u0litylocaTwns. CONSTRUCTION 2.It is the responsibility of the Contractor to perform of coordinate all — j — necessary utility demolitions and relocations from existing utility locations to all onsite amenities and buildings.These connections include,but are not limited to,water,sanitary sewer,cable N,telephone,gas,electric,site i lighting.etc. DD DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 1M12014 7 Prior to beginning work,contact Gopher State Onewll 651454-0002)to locate utilities throughout the area under construction.The Contractor 9 SD SCHEMATIC DESIGN 10(0712014 - ; I ----; ;•, / , shall retain the services of a private utilitylocator to locate the private @ ' i _. utilities. I I MARK DESCRIPTION MTE '`� 4. Sawcut along edges of pavements,sidewalks,and curbs to remain. i S rdance with stale and local n j standard specifications for construction. PROJECT N 6144 '4 .7 l. ..i DRAWN BY. 4PSM r —e L.1 I 121 `d / L .i I)( _ __ 1I�•---nyi __. CHECKED�BY. GA111B1.I. KRR < d COPYRIGHT: q 's* _� =e.,.,,."w a�as e�c`�Ec♦ic a 1 - t - wnnyne. �mer e DRAWING TITLE i r i - I _ a ....4 e I 77-7,7// DEMOLITION PLAN I� -r ALTERNATE NO.1 &3- ,• rf7,'___1t - - - - - - - - - - J _ ALTERNATE NO. 3 '_ j :I - I+ — i ti NORTH / I ' COLORED CONCRETE C1 . I ("r-• , ,i.,_. , ENTRANCE REPLACEMENT I E------ i ,; I I - , I � I ' ° 5 '° 2G -_- — , Trr.T E APC ( 1 '.T. �— II _.._.I 1EIE 701.258.3776 FM 707.223.7983 ♦ _ i� ! I I ) j 'M 116 W Main Ave,Suite A,Bismarck ND 58501 __..' ✓ 1' - --- -- _ \.-\\ ii;` I� L 1> ..... / . creM Forts NU FarW Np 6lamarck No �=1 !4 1 ! ! II .i 9p`i-y 7 � WIMon NG MYwf NO I Norxitlr Vr 1 B , N B-Ai B G c ! www.eapc.net eapanet 177 Larson - Engineering, Inc. t .��..---..-- 3524 Labore Road �._ White Bear Lake,MN 55110 651.481.9120 t 651.481.9201 -j.. www larsonengr com ! I( ' � ' NORTH ©2014 Larson Eng neMng,Inc.All rights resmM. i L -H' - ! ! I hereby certify that this plan.specifications or 1� I �- _ i I j•..i I' report was prepared by me u under se fired KEY PLAN P°oisonamon l Engineend that r am a urMe�the llawsotna state Y ri +- r;- �i 1 NOT TO SCALE of Minnesota 1 -�- �:."~ i i l � •! If �- —_--.— Greg A.Buchal,P.E. !, 1 yJj 4 I _ -- 1 :— I BOL LEGEND Data Reg.Ne.: / i , it .-f -.-- _..._..��.,..!* ._� ■ MI �I .�� !; i ^� JREMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING CLIENT SYM _ __ _ —_ ! j \-./ , <—J BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SECTION C I PARK NICOLLET REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING S ""-'.r F ;! i--_ _!.. -- _.._ '•;\, '. j `\� II f I; /r/,' CONCRETE PAVEMENT SECTION PARKINSON'S CENTER '•.-;'��.:,,;., ! - - GRASS REMOVAL LIMITS .. � I ._._ _. � E LAN FOR RESTORATION J � I SEE LANDSCAPE P I/ PROJECT DESCRIPTION i T KEY NOTES EXPANSION& --- ---- -''-� Q1 SAWCUT,REMOVE,AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING BITUMINOUS RENOVATION PAVEMENT SECTION. SAWCUT,REMOVE,AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING CONCRETE _ . . e PAVEMENT SECTION. SAWCUT,REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER. ✓ I ( 1 j t I i I t °.a. n �I r ® REMOVE AND SALVAGE EXISTING SIGN FOR OWNER CITY GOLDEN VALLEY II j ALTERNATE NO. 2 / ?— _ o ! O REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING RETAINING WALL. i 7-7-7--7 _ _ I ❑ . ' STATE MINNESOTA a / ♦ .. REMOVE AND SALVAGE EXISTING RIP RAP FOR REUSE. t T --- —---- ! 1 . . I 0 PROTECT EXISTING DECK DURING DEMOLITION AND -..._ _ -. ..... '� CONSTRUCTION. ISSUE DATES 't Tr �� RAMP DURING DEMOLITION AND �� > ,y��+• CONSTRUCTION. I �- ' I 1->Z.. ` .. .' PROTECT EXISTING 4hp4hp - ► '` ' ^ yr 9 REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING BUILDING,FOOTINGS AND /r+.♦ +.1� , ,.�.__ i , „ _. •._ _ . .i ,r' CONCRETE SLAB. . . . . 1 .. . + . . . .. .... . .+.. . .. NOT FOR i \ ,1 ! 10 REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING TREE. CONSTRUCTION t .-> ;^, Q TION , k' 1 � I r. a t ... . .. .. .... :• .. .. ...... . . ,Sly _ - .teix.>'s's«'.. t,. 00 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT ont rou r' �� :y ;f `•: $B SCHEMATIC DESIGN 10/02/2014 ' r / DEMOLITION NOTES . .. + y :.:'.`+'.`+' MARK DESCRIPTION DATE •. ...+... ... . ._.+w "./.�`�� ,•�y�' ,� � � 1. v II existing utility,locations. . ... ..... . 2.It is the responsibility of the Contractor•••+♦ /' I po ty c r to perform or cooMinate all '+✓ PROJECT NO: 12146144 '+,� ',•�^,^�•:++ �..+ necessary utility demolitions and relocations from existing utility locations . .':::.' :+ +�•�•`• — % ` t buildings.These connections include,but are _ t' -K"•.: ,�•:+ ��.! no�imited t water,sanitary(sewer,cable N,telephone,gas,electric,site t al amenities an �Jh I 11 DRAWN BY. PSM ,+. \ O lighting,etc CHECKED BY: GAB/KRR t/..?. +7+ •`+`•yi`�f �� 11 9 I 1 Prior to beginning work,contact Gopher State.,call(651-454-0002)to COPYRIGHT: ••�� '. N =� V V PLAT) locate utilities throughout the area under construction.The Contractor \.. shall retain the services of aprivatet I locator to locate the private •e•••a a .:.»:..m a u utiltCes. �wm:�n.�v.,e�'om.,.•�`w�N..uwa�w a» a22'30 4 Sawcul along edges of pavements,sidewalks,and curbs to remain. (S DRAWING TITLE 5. All construction shall be performed in accordance with state and local 77, standard specifications for construction. DEMOLITION PLAN _j ALTERNATE NO.2 L 70. 0 9 1289- ' 6 NORTH R 191 0 5 10 20 C1 .2 IMtEAPC r '2___— Y / Q„�AC` I p V` II k i - GS o TBE 701.258.3116 FM 701.223-7983 116 W Mam Ave,Suite A,Bismarck ND 58501 F oNo aunarckND WAislan ND ND(M ND I Nerwicb VT —kq MN 8u Nres MG f1sn(MawSSSTE 1830 PLAT) ...— � —..-- +•a-•:•,•• ,..,.s Ili 1 fi it I �J� 1. 1 rn 589 07"45 E COUNTRY -- - _ .. __ ,,,� , rl .,y _ ! WWW.2aPC110t i { 5.79 IR 22 X09"� ■ = 31 2 I �- ■' 'r- -I c ±1 1 i CLUB 27 74Y_7_45E ,, -s s—_ =7�5I•1.1.143362e(Rt3l,U9 PLA11 •� 1-r 1 R PU r) RIVE ' i = L °� Ir 1 Larson J Engineering,Inc.=2309.27 7 --34545.57 1C 0 1 �a {.Ar. ° o -- "�"'^.al t , '1 Yi '1 3524 Labore Road - _, 11 _ r d•:7y--a.:�_..�,. {�� .•� nt.„ -� _ __ 1 (•1. White Bear Lake,MN 55110 F q' I 651.481.9120(f)651.481.9201 1 ' y >- _ r� � ? ___ _ __ '"' -� .. vrWw.larsonengr.com ` 1 ♦ ,J r/ - - - C 2014 Larson En Inc.Al ng"reserved ._77 _--� li`. NORTH hereby cerbty thatthis plan specifications or ' el ! , 1 p •,t. -'!.. I '/I Rh-x! :./� reportws Prepared bymeorundermydlreot w T F, 31 :D e,W.h and that I am a dDly eoensed ! -�•_ r KEY PLAN Proles onal Engineer under the aws of the state o�, of Minnesota NOT TO SCALE �1 •I {}1+ 1 ' Greg A.Bushel,P.E. III hl j4 SYMBOL LEGEND Date' Rag.No.: m . _... __� ` `•..J 4;;� tt• fL—Jl f I CLIENT I /env•_, ,..i``` i I 1 }IF I NEW 3'BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT � �' __ I1. .)}r OVER e'AGGREGATE BASE ,I Y PARK NICOLLET 6 .. f - ___ TTT7- SEE DETAIL I/CS NEW BONDED AGGREGATE PAVING STRUTHERS OVER 6'AGGREGATE BASE PARKINSON'S SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN PROOFOpZrING I-- CENTER 10 STALL NEW4'CONCRETE OVER 6'AGGREGATE BASE PROOF,OF` JI= , SEE DETAIL 2/C5 PARKING 1 STALL PROJECT DESCRIPTION X WHERE APPLICABLE,DIMENSIONS ARE FROM A I ! 7. BOR BACK OF PROPOSED ADDITION N f:• 'J� 1 '1[� 1 -'--1� MAIN FLOOR 935.10(ARCH 100') • 7 /, r f//:/.. I '_G'"` ,:�. F.;-/ ``I ..l ../_; __ �.; I l BACK OF CURB TO BACK OF CUR EXPANSION$L RENOVATION CURB TO END OF STALL LINE. oil W .. I as �aznw�� �� 3 I ._i i 0� --i -� o -- CITY GOLDEN VALLEY v) — �o STATE MINNESOTA P ; �I ,.I ISSUE DATES PROOF OF PARKING 24 STALLS • L NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION a k S i - • - -) - - TREX DECKING ..'� .; . SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN L ,N .: )0 DD DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 1M1@014 DESIGN 70/01!2014 O SD SC i MARK DESCRIPTION TE PROJECT NO: 12146144 ,Y I J: DRAWN PSM CHECKED BY: GABIKRR ., 193.80 COPYRIGHT' 578OST3d'w 5v?w 63 PLAT) m1 �L 70.099 DRAWING TITLE 8,11289.16 I t rr M (a.onzo 2 44 T1 PAVING PLAN BASE BID NORTH 0 15 30 60 C2.0 P'\P:olects\Pro—1-2014\12146144-Struthers Clinic Pko Lot Exp\C.Desimi0awino Files112146144 C2D dwg trritEAPIC ®®® + � r _-- --i- '-----'— -'— "' ; 7r1E 701.258.3116 FAX 707 223 7983 (N89 5957 E 48.50 PLAT) - I' `r_ _ f -•^—•- +. {- s 6 W Main Ave,Suite A,Bismarck ND 56501 S8,9707 45COUNTRY E f � � yr Groh Fake NO I Fargo NO I Bismadc NO 1 �- j Bem�idjiMN Buema Akee ARG ��' r4 4 5. 79 I' W W WAapC.l16F L1.7 .37 __.. i — 4 __ � ----- a � Eng neserOinDF Inc. _ - - -- -- 3524 Labors Road /, __---------_.-- L=151.43 _ -----------. PLA T - - _ 651.481.9201 _ -„-'- — - ._-_....__ � 3 / , •+ _ NORTH rson c reserved. 5 � ' 2014 , �� , , hRe Bear Lela,M 5 110 3'19 I� --_---'_ P prepared e or undo Y direct �r _ www arsonaRgr com 48 -- L = 5 -'--' - - .___...._ I .._.._ lOhe�eb�cernthat 1H�plan^speafica�oor F /� -._-__.__._.___._&._ --^-_ a ___ r� . 3V R—_2�0 _ __ _ � t , KEY PLA ProfessionaloE 9�elr under the haws of0%state ._._. - -_ 1� - f Minnesota. ALTERNATE NO. 1- �> NOT TO SCALE ; —-:— --'� �`-1.'e:.•-e..r_�--�i.'-�k�-ya.-=----�-- —_ � Cdr , 92 r- Greg A.Buchal,P.E. Date: Reg.No.: i � _ LEGEND CLIENT -I i ; }a ,- � .{- ,_. `• , _ NEW 3'BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT + 1 ! �„✓- :^-� ^�•>\ �--; T �. I f+I ;N% OVER 8”AGGREGATE BASE y SEE DETAIL 1/C5 PARK NICOLLET NEW BONDED AGGREGATE PAVING STRUTHERS OVER6"AGGREGATE BASE PARKINSON'S -Y �, 1 ��• ,, t� SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN II �t' CENTER y. / NEW4"CONCRETE fe SEE DETAIL 2/C5 BASE OVER 6"AGGREGA C PROJECT DESCRIPTION WHERE APPLICABLE,DIMENSIONS ARE FROM p BACK OF CURB TO BACK OFC B OR BACK OF S I O N Ul f 1 f DR RENOVATION 24 ; + s L.. CITY GOLDEN VALLEY , r Ii t ', TAPER URSHEI r r I STATE MINNESOTA ISSUE DATES I ! T. r' NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION o - DO SIGN DEVELOPMENT I31I20 HEMATICDEStGN N2Y10 SD SC 1✓ I I ____. MARK DESCRIPTION 10 DATE14 vi : ., , PROJECT NO: 12146144 — 1 r PSM DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: GAB/KRR COPYRIGHT: II _/ / / " - I DRAWING TITLE PAVING PLAN ALTERNATE NO.1&3 I i -- -... ' �may1;; I � 1 -- I ALTERNATE NO. 3 H h NORT COLORED CONCRETE " ;IC2. 1 ENTRANCE REPLACEMENT D 5 10 20 SYMBOL LEGEND NEW 3"BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT r E A P C OVER 8"AGGREGATE BASE SEE DETAIL 1/C5 NEW BONDED AGGREGATE PAVING OVER 6'AGGREGATE BASE SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN II is I t t _ NEW 4"CONCRETE l �-- ;�. ,. : 7[;•" OVER 6'AGGREGATE BASE D SEE DETAIL 2/CS I r-�� TELE 701.258.3116 FM 701.223.7983 I � I e5 0 I I! 7 � 116 W Main Ave,Suite A,Bismarck ND 58501 I WHERE APPLICABLE,DIMENSIONS ARE FROM L i •• -- I s - Z .- BACK OF CURB TO BACK OF CURB OR BACK OF I i j.r_ F'I t ! Graoe Fong ND Fargo No BI—ND CURB TO END OF STALL LINE. I I j - to ,e - ° -j r I wuawo NG I Migl ND I BI vi Bemidji MN Buerga Nres ARG i �� LJ-• cs` W W W.6aF)C.(182 7 Larson J" Engineering, Inc. 'I , -_. 3524 Labore Road _— _.�, t \ White Bear Lake,MN 55110 651 481.9120(1)651.481.9201 ; p , I : i v i''• I 1 I� � i /l �`' I © www larsonengccom 2014 Larson Eng—ling,Inc Ann reerved. ts s • 1' \ iI t��. NORTH t �' SSS hereby cert ry that is plan,specifications or -—_ f.. report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed / t T i I-i i '. f v �'•'z / rt'; KEY PLAN Professional Engineer under the Iaws or the state Ii`^-._ NOT TO SCALE of Minnesota _ t — _ 1 Greg A al, �•� J , •'"�— Date: Reg.No.: `�.`':---- _ s CLIENT tr, - -- -. . PARK PIL ET TRUTHERS L TI ' ONS CENTER it -- — i �; —– -- 1 .-. - PROJECT DESCRIPTION - i; EXPANSION& RENOVATION I I , I CITY GOLDEN VALLEY i STATE MINNESOTA it ALTERNATE NO. 2 ISSUE DATES NOTCONSTORUCTION I } 6IGNOEVELOPMENT 1201 1 HEMATICOESIGN 1201 , SD SC QO :..J-✓< > 1 I� MARK DESCRIPTION tOATE4 • L^ J ! SM DRAWN BY o: 1214P144 CHECKED BY: GAB/KRR ..... { , I _ .: ':• .a <-• J :-' y� `C'r A� �_ COPYRIGHT: {, 7, g 3 so I µ .� I ,-� ivvx � ? \ \ ._ - .�.. ' DRAWING TITLE Ts g 3 � PL- - - - - - - - - - - - - AT w = - 22 _ (S7 PAVING PLAN ALTERNATE NO.2 NORTH L= 7( ° 0 5 10 20 C2.2 GRADING NOTES LEGEND 1. Tree protection consisting of show fence or safety fence installed at the - :=i0------- EXISTING CONTOURS I r E A P C drip line shall be in place prior to beginning any grading or demolition 950 PROPOSED CONTOURS-MAJOR INTERVAL work at the site. 949 PROPOSED CONTOURS-MINOR INTERVAL ----------- GRADE BREAK LINE 2. Allelevations with an asterisk(')shall be field verified.If elevations _ "'"-' ,F^•^-""e a.�"""'T• vary s gnificantly,notify the Engineer for further instructions. GRADE SLOPE .. ©�.., 1 '�r"ti s k/py::c,•'�. _ '•'m"•• t;- 0 SILT FENCE I t 9 � '' ®®® 3. Grades shown in paved areas represent finish elevation �' 0 o I 1 RIP RAP/ROCK CONST.ENTRANCE �f -i I" /I a 4. Refer to Landscape plan for restoretion requirements. I > I TILE 701.258.3116 Fq%701.223.7983 h 5. All construction shall be performed n accordance with state and local INLET PROTECTION 2•ys yl I _ I I x- 116 W Ma n Ave Su to A B:s-1,ND 56501 •gS ti OO standard specifications for censtrucfion 1 •�a i T ) F yT- QA'J�• ��-od� I I I - F - G:and-ND Fargo NG Biarc smk ND `_-- NO NO1 CONCRETE WASHOUT STATION II 1 i i ��e� -� I •� �m N Iaua�,osares ARc IN � SPOT ABBREVIATIONS: r 4 .......,. .,,T r'• (Na9593Tf '14 Ful) _ ._ ".^,•• 950.00 TC Ilt ..ti:L S890T43 E COUNTf7Y, Tc-TOP OFcuxa ' F + + I WWW.eapcnet �. 949.50 GL ..a.....�,.•_®._..-t - I , "� _• Y GL-GUTTER LINE _ _ 45.79 CLUB07309: _- B-BITUMUNOUS C4° r i R=2319.27 . 3 ■' 2 Fr .:' C-CONCRETE i. f -[npsE957Y SwNq..4_rJ -_ ,_.,t,.�„:,. ,.�1-, " Jcs x. :. :,_,,,,,e ':_.�. _ = i L=1S.62 DRIVE - _ EO-EMERGENCY OVERFLOW S89 0/45 f •,. i ;;s+T- �oro•r9•E�rt 1 Furl 1 _- f '�-- �' Larson TW-TOP OF WALL a `j - - - ~� -- -- I 4 .... - "3.i- -c.v> .._ _ ....._.-.._ t. _., , ..tir•�_ / ., , BW-BOTTOM OF 1. ,:.j Engineering,Inc. .5.57. 1.-:_. _.a._ ._.__.� ,•. M. 3 ..:-,.r BO O O ALL FIG) ' . gr 'L ,1YG Labore Road R 23@927-_ _ - Ilc .__ a?]1 .mak _"x. _4 "- a. - _ w r .__ /'' - NG ELEV. (')E EXISTING TTCH O B6 VERIFIED �I -•� � �v �k,., ,r t>;2: _,- 4:, a.,11 _ I L"�9 i•* Whi�e�Bear Lake,MN 55110 �� 651.481.9120 651.481.9201 i t- / _ ���: i I � '+,- -,,.� V% � ,� •+,� „� 9. - / - I F 4...-cdl�',C� www.larsonengr.com ©2014 Larsen Engineering.Inc All rights reservetl NORTH +� s _ - p i - ►L I hereby cera this Ian.specifications or Y N P repo prepared by me y _ :epe�ry:w�emit l em a duly ndCen�dd rata I v� !� _ KEY PLAN Professional En \ t /; er yodel the Taws of the sale s NOT TO SCALE of Minnesota Engineer T' T 1 'v Greg A.Buchal.P.E. r i 1, { 1 .{ if ..�1 1 `•t Dela: Reg.No.: 93390 TC ! M�.B' 111 _ •_r - CLIENT JP / 83 T IIJ - EROSION CONTROL NOTES 1. �/ `z� f a, � :. -, _ - PARK NICOLLET 'I I,•�� - �? „ f+ / ' 1 / ) 1 # 1. Owner and Contractor shall obtain MPCA-NPDES permit.Contractor shall be responsible for all tees pertaining to this permit.The I I [s� 1 r•.> l/ r SWPPP shall be kept onsite at all times. STRUTHERS iV r /wltl' I a c 932.85cT �I z.3o j ,t - � .�::: PARKINSON'S I - s3a.ro rc - "�-^" 934.40 GL -^"'"� '�-"'1 •+Y- I >, 2. Insall temporary erosion control measures(inlet protection,silt fence,and rock construction entrances)prior to beginning any I`�' m �r d` ! ,; m CENTER � // a •` •, I , "'� i L __ PROOF OF excavation or demolition work at the site 10 STA / ( -- -- -�--'- _ �"' 3. Erosion control measures shown on the erosion control plan are the absolute minimum.The contractor shall install temporary earth dikes sediment traps or basins,additional siltation fencing,and/or disk the soil parallel to the contours as deemed necessary to further 935.10 C 1 933.65 r 933 QO L!S control erosion.All changes shall be recorded in the SWPPP. PROJECT DESCRIPTION a { P 4. All construction site entrances shall be surfaced with crushed rock across the entire width of the entrance and from the entrance to a point 50'inlo the construction zone. EXPANSION 8L PROPOSED ADDITION 934 00 TC 1 1�J 5. The toe of the sift fence shall be trenched In a minimum of 6' The french backfill shall be compacted with a vibmto l 933.50 ' '' Pa rypaacompacer. RENOVATION a I j MAIN FLOOR= (ARCH 100) 1 GL//�-' fl t 30 11: ,.. ,.... 1 934 C �,.� • y {- - '- ` / o�/ 6. All grading operations shall be conducted In a manner to minimize the potential for site erosion.Sediment control practices must be established on all down gradient perimeters before any up gradient land disturbing activities begin. 9 '3 7. All exposed soil areas must be stabilized as soon as possible to limit sell erosion but In no case later than 14 days after the construction h I .fi•y` : { �>" 1. ` -.... - activity in that portion of the site has temporarily or permanently ceased Temporary stockpiles without significant sift,clay or organic components ads,parkingelots and similar surfacesare exempt from this requirement les,sand stockpiles) d the constructed base components of 2 an coin o CITY GOLDEN VALLEY n I I M _ L�/ I''• i >,; i� , Q, - -- S. The normal wetted perimeter of any temporary or permanent drainage ditch or swale that drains water from any Portion of the c r -I I; I' construction site,or diverts water around the site,must be stabilized within 200 lineal feet from the property edge,or from the point of w .q I: ..raj _ 1' '� r ' I ir I Wdischarge into any surface water.Stabilization of the last 200 lineal feet must be completed within 24 hours after connecting to a STATE MINNESOTA g 4 I 934.30 C 933.4 C I 4, ,� ! __ __ - 1 - surface water.Stabilization of the remaining portions of any temporary or permanent ditches or swales must be complete within 14 days after connecting to a surface water and construction in that portion of the ditch has temporarily or permanently ceased. ddxT { 9. Pipe outlets must be provided with energy dissipation within 24 hours of connection to surface water. ISSUE DATES 11.0 S 10. All npmp shall be Installed with a filter material or soil separation fabric and comply with the Minnesota Department of Transportation Standard Specifications. PROOF 4: 11. All storm sewer catch basins not needed for site drainage�� Y __:-, d image tlur ng construction shall be covered to prevent runoff from entering the storm sewer system.,Catch basins necessary for site drainage during construction shall be provided with inlet protection. NOT FO R 932.30 TC` '__ r I r L;i IS 931 80 GL I 12. In areas where concentrated flows occur(such as swales and areas in front of storm catch basins and intakes)the erosion control CONSTRUCTION - 931.70 C M E B' facilities shall be backed by stabilization structure to protect those facilities from the concentrated flows. 931.90 TC 1 13. Inspect the construction site once eve seven da Burin active construction and within 24 hours after a rainfall event greater than 0.5 ' (} !'. 931 40 GL 1931 50 TC `a/ I 1 inches n 24 hoursAll Inspections shall be recorded In the SWPPP. �� 41 ,- 14 931 00 TC 32 40 TC .kf I I 832 All BMPs must be repaired.replaced,or su piemented when they become nonfunctional or the sediment reaches 113 of the he M of ( - 931.20 TC' the BMP.These repairs must be made within 24 hours of discovery,or as soon as field condNons allow access.All repairs shall be ' �- 931.05 TC ,amu:,�hyy _ Og DESIGN DEVELOPMENT iM12014 ,.ye - ; /, 930 70 GL' y i recorded in the SWPPP _ y9� 93055 GL j' { x � - 15 If sediment escapes tit con ction site off--site accumulations of sediment must be removed n a manner a d ata q cy icI ntSO CHEMATIC DESIGN 93t00rO'•= to minimize off site impacts. I n e ,fl 1 GL 1 i 93050 GL --.- - 1rf - i _:�"`v ..:::�_ ::�'. 1 q"" ?- 1 may, ,•�'1 MARK DESCRIPIION -DATE- 16. All wits tracked onto pavement shall be removed daily. .I -31'x• { "- s3o-To 7 �o / ,- S' �.; �\` 4. N.:s, .. ..a..:... r _ r .f-• 1 / uen s r. e _ 8300 r -' -' - 17 these areas a protected from compaction due to construction equipment driving across the Infiltration area. a mfilVabon area and r. on ararearomu meds tcho en nitro j 3 _ r All InfilVa st be InspeU sure that no sedime ongoing censWchon activlty is reaching tit PROJECT N0: �2�46�� DRAWN BY: PSM ;''^ 18. Temporary soil stockpiles must have silt fence or other effective sediment controls,and cannot be placed in surface waters,including / stormwater conveyances such as curb and gutter systems,or conduits and ditches unless there is a bypass in place for the stormwater. CHECKED BY: GABIKRR , RAP �"' ''a,. r + _ , ' Pip / y _ 19. Collected sediment,asphalt and concrete millings,floating debris,paper,plastic,fabric,construction and demolition debris and other COPYRIGHT: SILT FENCE,TVP / / '\ \ \_ r ! wastes must be disposed of properly and must comply with MPGA disposal requirements. ^ r -•� �_ ' $ m?7J _______ - 20. Oil,gasoline,paint and any hazardous substances must be property stored,including secondary containment,to prevent spills,leaks orp p^°'r >^•^ '^E^� ^^ other discharge.Restricted access to storage areas must he provided to prevent vandalism.Storage and disposal of hazardous waste must be In compliance with MPCA regulations. L 9 g DRAWING TITLE -" 21. External washing of tacks and other construction vehicles must be limited to a defined area of the site.Runoff must be contained and '.-- R�TT2�1& -'"^ ,.' - '•-.-' --_- - waste properly disposed of.No engine degreasing is allowed onsite. _a21 pKAn- : P contained,.. ___ _ "- 22. All liquid and solid wastes generated by concrete washout o orations must be contained in a leak-proof containment facility or DING AND impermeable The solidcompacted smustliner otcothat actthe grounallow d. llimust otbenter gmundwater hecon co nsidered ewasho impermeable EROSION CONTROL PLAN "-_ Nner.The liquid and solid wastes must not contact the ground,and Mere must not be runoff from the concrete washout operations or ' :.,_.-�_ --'� -�-�.. "'�., I i ;" �-�. areas.Liquid and solid wastes must be disposed of property and in compliance with MPCA regulations.A sign must be installed BASE BID adjacent to each washout facility to inform concrete equipment operators to utilize the proper facilities. r _ '" _ -_ - !"• 23. Upon completion of the project and stabilization of all graded areas,all temporary erosion control facilities(silt fences,hay bales,etc.) shall be removed from the site. NORTH 24. Contractor shall submit Notice of Termination for MPCA-NPDES permit within 30 days after Final Stabilization. 00 1� 60 C3.0 E A P C Lo I� a — —-- -- —-------z. I 701 258 3116 Fax 701 223 7983 1 1I '30 - ;';�- �!.T 116 L L 6WMainAve,vIe,Suite ABismarck ,tlNoND 5a6V5 0 1(N895957 E 48.50 PLAT) W.MFarkND FagNaarDS89 00 7'4 5 "E eMpNo 'MIMN suroAirasARGTiCOUNTRY ,45. 79 �` ' W.03pG12}LUB a0 r _ i � -� Larson ----- _. Engineering, Inc.11 : r 3524 Labore Road ' — :4 52 e Bear _ ----- _-151_43 �'-- -- _ y. � �;.. ^ _ _ v *2,3'1C I�< � .� � :-Ct651i148 91 Oa(f)65N4811.9201 66=3{ J/ I , .. ••.. LA / --�' �_ �_.� _.-_ '---- (4=0 .. �Q •� .. ��-' www.larsonengccom ©20a la n Engneg Inc.All rgMsrem.NORTH 9 1 r,--- '' .. i•. �T- - -__ hereby ter0fy That this plan Sper( Jwbons or report was me or der my dired ---- 1 -- - - -- Y `—._! � —— — — �'i G\ < — \ KEY PLAN arch sensed +' a _ . Profess onaPI E naebunder the haws of the state t, �� 7 -� of Minnesota �' _;ALTERNATE NO. T �. �1.. j� / l� •.' 1 1�r' --4� \.• -..__ .-_.._[ � NOT TO SCALE r . �}� ,.y,• ��; � �-r.� L.j�l� _�1 awe-.awry y� t -�....a�N•..,_ � � rre �r` Grog A.Buchal.P.E. \ _ '•--f'. ��( ' � r r- �- j '- ?)�.- � '_t -_ /{ _^t�_ - - _i'i ,_ J .J`-', •-t ;. \ - --� .. _-_ -_-... �.._._t����l r "-•�-.._ _ Date: Reg.No_ I � _ 1 _ "_ _ _ �� •� 7, _ -�. __ LEGEND i!�', i 1 +.� ' r •\ (•`�j- ,�.? r+, -/../ %l- .- ,� \ - _. _ .1 3 f __•_r-+t.. :}Ir,'t 950. _ _ _. EXISTING CONTOURS II .t I I i h`3 < T -(� `-•'' \ / ",-�. -' �+ �� TS '• '7 950 PROPOSED CONTOURS-MAJOR INTERVAL i I �' it r -. �•\ - "` rs-, 7-� 1��,' - 949 PROPOSED CONTOURS-MINOR/ �� CLIENT f ._ PARK NICOLLET ----------- GRADE BREAK LINE STRUTHERS 1I i tdlJ t� GRADE SLOPE 932.90C ' ? . _ PARKINSON'S ! — , 935 � 1 'i SILT FENCE CENTER x �. i Ii I• ,.\ r/ +' - �`J-_/ _ `_'- _ -' �� `,�. 1��'� `P _ 1� •! 1 c".. RIP-RAP I ROCK CONST.ENTRANCE - ' ` 93510TW INLET PROTECTION �J � PROJECT DESCRIPTION %',' ✓,z J _ _.1 c' 93 25 WIC g . a, 1' .� I - '� 4-S 1 1 k-' 1 a 1 I 1 1'r' �h. `r/ 'I /... ' I1 1 I nf`1! ,• , .... (; -. _ n i s .} p S 3 :.1 r .J r ry CONCRETE WASHOUT STATION ' N 3_s-1. o _ eu G �Ir I j r( RENOVATIONEXPANSI Vas 7 ' -- --'-- -- § g ( SPOT ABBREVIATIONS: r :�.` ._93230C - +� .00TI 950 C @t v TC; TOPOF CURB .. _. 94950 TL _ —, I (i GL-GUTTER LINE - _. i !- 931.951TC B•BITUMUNOUS r-_ s33t9BWic J+r 1 C-CONCRETE 93x 45 GL - - }A / - :y,+r+' ....�. EO-EMERGENCY OVERFLOW I. ., ' r• TW-TOPOFWALL BW-932.50 T&" 93210 TC �� 931 70 TG `•Ir >j '" . 9320D '•931.BOG�' J 931.20 GL: ,(i M.E.BM TCHEXISOTTOM OF VTNGEALL F/ CITY GOLDEN VALLEY / 1 EXISTING TO BE VERIFIED STATE MINNESOTA I .� r C` i ! , I ''4•{ , 1 I ISSUE DATES GRADING NOTES 7 Tree protection consisting o1 snow fence or safety fence installed at the T y� / - `T 931.50 CB I - drip line shall be In place prior to beginning any grading or demolition psi f `. _ -- work at the she. I I CONSTRUCTION 2. All elevations with an asterisk_ NOT FOR - r. (')shall be field ved(ietl.If elevations M'E— varysgnifcan0y,notify the Engineer for further Instructions. — www• www• www• www• J 3. Grades shown in paved areas represent finish elevation. .1 4. Refer to Landscape plan for restoration requirements. Ol -/ • ... 5. All construction shall be performed in accordance with slate and local standard specifications for consbuction. D0 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 70!312014 TJ C- �`� •^}j .. SD SCHEMATICDESIGN 101022014 s r MARK DESCRIPTION DATE EROSIONPROJECTN SEE SHEET C3.0O: 12'146144 ,� \ rt .�? f•°Flt / .= .--.. .---.. - —---- �r r 1' t • _ �-y f�>,v I DRAWN BY: PSM CHECKED BY: GAB/KRR �.. ..•I .'� i '•`7 I <i ! \ 'w ' II j COPYRIGHT: i � .. F. \ .�•�'-,-� 1 c/ I � f •¢T J c'p. - I 1 I � » .....,iwi..m.�'ma�m.•a r�'.ac•� ` 1 I•-J�f`<, T t. i j 1 J I! Ii DRAVu'ING TITLE 1 . i GRADING AND .-1 -/..— / ER j ``'1• j OSION CONTROL PLAN --- - z _.. - �l ALTERNATE NO.1 &3 td = y F-71T i I NORTHT HRNATE NO. 3 itALTECOLORED CONCRETE 0 5 ID 20 C3. 1ENTRANCE REPLACEMENT GRADING NOTES EROSION CONTROL NOTES LEGEND 1. Tree protection consisting of snow fence or safety fence installed at the SEE SHEET C3.0, EXISTING CONTOURSAr.�EAPC drip line shall be in place prior to beginning any grading or demolition 950PROPOSED CONTOURS-MAJOR INTERVAL -..-�-.. work at the site. - "'" ^�.- 949 PROPOSED CONTOURS-MINOR INTERVAL TP - ---- GRADE BREAK LINE2. All All elevat ons with an asterisk(*)shall be field Verified.If elevations0% �� �y+• � Y 1. ..,mac-""-"°'•^w,�,.,,� ®®® vary significantly.notify the Engineer for further instructions. GRADE SLOPE (2 a Ips— SILT FENCE 3. Grades shown in paved areas represent finish elevation, 4. Refer to Landscape plan for restoration requirements. RIP-RAP/ROCK CONST.ENTRANCE Ii x° rI ' /1 ,. c o LL I: I T h iELE 701.256.3116 rnx 701.223.7983 5. All construction shall be performed In accordance with state and local r T INLET PROTECTION I I L .;L__ r ! r__..._.�. ' �. 'A 116 W Main Ave.Suite A.Bismarck NO 58501 standard specifications for construction. ,lr--dl I 1-I -,r=`• I r �t r Y'g' t, � 4- r +. 1 Gand Forks NO Fargo ND Bismaeck ND `---j CONCRETE WASHOUT STATION '1 Li - ,_I - ... -rF-F-r ( '1 wwisroe rvD I Miaw No I rver,;a yr ` r}.. `( Bemigi x+N Buems/'res ARG SPOT ABBREVIATIONS: �e t ' - a•+ - 1"� 1 95000 TC TC-TOPOFCURB I s , iT I ,� t 1 WwW'eapC'tiet 949.50 GL ILI ' CL COBITUNCRETOE SE F } {.. w>c.- f$.. �� •1 ......._., ' _ Jt i i EO-EMERGENCY OVERFLOW S T° -_ _ l''r Larson I TW-TOP OF WALL BW-BOTTOM OF WALL(FIG) _ : _ _sa Engineering,Inc. .- - 3524 Labors Road M.E.•MATCH EXISTING ELEV.f '� t1 !dr 1 I {' �•"�� White Bear Lake,MN 55110 j I')-EXISTING TO BE VERIFIED 651 481.9120(1)651.481.9201 www.larsonengr.conn �'Z• ' - ,; \\ „ ^ I / , 2\;._.-._._� �y_ N© ©2014 Larson Engineering,Inc.An rights reserved. i 14, I i'- I ! \' I r.:, 1 hereby certify that this plan,specifications or _ _ ! report was prepared by me or under my direct ' f ( i % I 1 \I j I I — --- ---_._ -- /i supervision and that I am a duty licensed KEYEngineer under the laws of the state t? I 1 f of Minnesota. r .) Professional` r / NOT TO SCALE N L _ ylI X — I -- __. I IJ Gres A.Buchal.P.E. • 'f.' r , ii,� Date: Re No.: 1 � !-- ^=1'•�-- ---- ' ! G,`i"•J'I � I I an .�:i _� ,}. J � _, CLIENT i 1 t}; n ^' [ PARK NICOLLET `. r ' i� t- < G STRUTHERS / _ — -� '�� ':. � � i��." PARKINSON'S ' — - - - CENTER `. ,:-,` f 11 n� �h .. -- — /. I ' `: %! `•t, ?i PROJECT DESCRIPTION I _ __-- - '931.50 TC.' .. j, -- — - -- — --- - --- - - 9siooEXPANSION & cYGs 11 9311 RENOVATION - —--F ,I {I -I- .> .__. 931.20 TC 1 i..... ,931.00 TC J ---- r 1 -- - s3D 7o c B- 3095 TC GOLDEN VALLEY 4. CITY 991.*C48 ..... STATE MINNESOTA t ..,.� -- ISSUE DATES ALTERNATE NO. 2 -- __ --- _--- - 1. .. _......__ ..— SILT FENCE,TYP.' - _.___ ; _ .. 930.80 TC. ;-I- 1 - - r. ..,, 930.7C TF E : ' .i' i 7 1' 1 OG _ _._-.. ... _ - - -. _. _.. 930 20 GL , — NOT FOR I C: -,l ,... F •._ .. :.,,—__— _. ..._. - _.-.r._._ _ � - �I /' .. ' 1 " :r . y CONSTRUCTION 930.90 / ,• .'� " ! rel '' - t....... / 931.40�� \ 00 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 1a31207 a ✓ , 932.40 SD SCHEMATIC DESIGN 10101/1014 <9 C � J,?` 931.18 I x`''� {l, �0 C�`, � - -•/ 83300C f ✓ .. :`' M1L 7 / f-::_ ../ 429 r 933. _._..— -... �� DEscrslPn DATF c t • / ECT NO: 12146144 933 r. 378C` 'RIP RAP DRAWN BY: PSM - 1 93. BERM GABIKRR I 3,40 B TW i ' 3.° - CCOPYRIGHT:C� s 3.aD9w/c �`�t`g `�" ' j'• K I / .- 19 - � i DRAWING TITLE GRADING AND --- I �.. _ - - EROSION CONTROL PLAN :. moi! ALTERNATE NO.2/ _ i i f.. r, _ NO nYJ' R TH {}, ' - 0 5 G 20 C3 .2 , J r � ' 1 i •.. sl I ( I °--- � ME t TEAPC I R, rEtE 701.258 3716 FM 707.223.7983 III ) 1 I ) ' 116 W Man Ave Suite A.Bismarck NO 58501 /r % I ��f ,� •1 �h `•"_� )1��. ( � 114 —�•#_-•. (. � ( LA_ I G M Forks NO Fargo ND &snurck ND cur:m„ND Nmi ND yr 'i ILi ` + Bern[4i MN a..—Aires ARG � L tjj _1 www.eePcnet �:•J ITT_._ J •�A..... t .,..' 111 I� :- �', \.,`:•,, __ � I( I � I i � III I, t y t kr"�— + c i f f �- j' • hLarson ti �� q K _ Engineering,Inc. I \ `• `-- + ! i' 1' `i % / `..: 1 - .NJ,; ^t !,� 3524 Labors Road White Bear Lake,MN 55110 651.481.9120(f)651.481.9201 www.larsonengccom c.All NORTH Oereby oerery that this v nn specifications ori. : +. 2014 Larson Engi-enng, _ -r� I 1 L / y j ` _ r ( KEY PLAN report and that I am a duly licensed aM I prepay by me or un y t Professional Engineer under the laws of the state r NOT TO SCALEGreg of Minnesota. A Date: Reg.No.: i . ' ' I— 'I I (L%y t { I I LEGEND CLIENT 1 s n 1 O STORM MANHOLE CN CABLE UNDERGROUND LINE — L - D '� r - Of ELECTRIC OVERHEAD LINE PARK NICOLLET L �� �� ( .^% CATCH BASIN O UE ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND LINE STRUTHERS CURB INLET FO FIBER OPTIC UNDERGROUND LINE Ij r 1 PARKINSON'S I ', + , i c•y , —C—G— NATURAL GAS UNDERGROUND LINE R FLARED END _y y— SANITARY SEWER PIPE CENTER SANITARY MANHOLE » STORM SEWER PIPE { O _,- r( HYDRANT —T—T— R TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND LINE SSS... ,.....'- `•l -= .--- - —• i , .--••--;G------ d - I-1-1— WATERMAIN PIPE N GATE VALVE 8 BOX - - DRAINTILE PIPE PROJECT DESCRIPTION ,-„' 1 ..h _ (�.--�. —'ll I I ' j ® WATER SHUTOFF EXPANSION 8a ``\,:•. '; \`\ .I !_..._': !..._._`___!1 ,.._c_.J r ,�. I ' LIGHT POLE RENOVATION I I 1 FIELD VERIFY EXISTING ROOF COLLECTION PVC UNDERDRAIN LOWER BENEATH STORAGE SYSTEM AND PROVIDE NEW WATERTIGHT CONNECTION AT DRY WELL �,• --”-- UTILITY NOTES SOUTH INFILTRATION AND STORAGE SYSTEM ——— A— 1. It is the responsibility of the contractor to perform or coordinate all necessary utility connections and (7)-60 LF.36-HDPE PIPES ———————————--—— '`� relocations from existing INV=921.50 X12"O CLEANOUT.TYP.OF 7 ng uEliry locations to the proposed building,as well as to all Desks amenities. RIM-931.28'O These connections include but are not limited to water,sanitary sewer,cable TV,telephone.gas, I { electric,site lighting,etc CITY GOLDEN VALLEY RIM=931.21' { i s 2. All service connecfions shall be performed in accordance with state and local standard { I specifications for construction,thdi (sa ycorrectionsnitarysewer,watennain,andstormsewer) STATE MINNESOTA RIM-931.14- O I { may require a permit from the City. { RIM=931.07' O { ._______ .__.. _._. .. ..._ _ ._ ___ _ 3. The contractor shall verify the elevafions at proposed connections to existlng utilities prix to any ____ ...__ - - demolition or excavation. . ISSUEDATES { I RIM=931.00' O 4. The contractor shall notify all appropriate engineering departments and utilhy companies 72 hours prior to construction.All necessary precautions shall be made to avoid damage to existing utilities. I RIM=930.93'O I 12'0 CLEANOUT 17 HDPE(OUTLET) 1 I I 5. Stone sewer requires tesfing In accordance with Minnesota plumbing code 4715.2820 where ..�.-- -...._.. __-.._ ..___. F .. _...... IW--92,120 _. located within l0 feet of watedines or the bolding. NOT FOR RIM=930.80'Q 6. HDPE stoml sewer pigng and fittings must meet materials and installation standards per CONSTRUCTION L--------- -- }— J _....._ including RCP h pressure 12°HDPE 4 LF�1.00% A C2321 installation practices.The City requires pipe within public - _ Minnesota plumbing code 47 2.C 4 and 4 In u Ing A joint test and ASTM ion ra C re uir P ' the ub' right-of—y. ------ — = - — 7 Maintain a minimum a cover over all water sewer Imes Install water �. .:"..:: _ .......__. __ _.... of I rhnes and sanitaryover lines er all ! ( - j R1101=930.20 �'SOq piping of meterialsnequal to watermain standards for 9 feat on bath s des and mainite n 18 tof sewer DO DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 1013112014 _ INV=924.60 separation. .i t. __. .__ __.-�';" r t ' SUMP=920.60 , 8. Where 7 h'of cover Is not provided over sanitary sewer and water lines.Install 2'rigid polystyrene SCHEMATIC DESIGN 10NN1014 %211%44.. �Pinsulation(MWDOT 3760)with a thermal resistance of at least 5 and a compressive strength of alSDIeast 25 psi.Insulation shall be 4'wide,centered over p pe with 6'sand cushion between pipe and MARK DESCRIPTIONGATE1-L Iiinsulation.Where depth is less than 5,use 4'of Insulation.° 9. See Pro ect S ecifications for beddin re rements.._ - 1 P 9 qui� � ' PROJECTN 6144 0: 1214 DRAWN BY: PSM J / CHECKED BY: GAB/KRR ( CONNECTIONS DDEPT ) � J j i FIELD VERIFY DRY WELL C NNECT NS AN HS ` COPYRIGHT: �l DRAWING TITLE f= — so -1 \ UTILITY PLAN , 5 2 W 88 PLAT) BASE BID i S 7 g°() 3�„W 193 (S77-223011W S'7 22 NORTH 0 5 10 20 C4.0 NEW Y BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT PLACED IN 2 LIFTS EAP HARD SURFACE/ PUBLIC ROAD 8"BASE M AGGREGATE r-701.258.3116 FM 701.223.7983 I� 116 W Main Ave,Suite A,Bismarck ND 58501 1"-2"WASHED ROCK GEOTEXTILE FABRIC APPROVED SUBGRADE SOIL 6"MINIMUM WIN—No I Mimi No I N—onyr Grant Forts ND Fargo ND BI-.,.NO —,MN Buenas Mas ARG BITUMINOUS 11Y1Nwaam„et CONSTRUCTION DETAIL s ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE C$ NOT TO SCALE Cs NOT TO SCALE Larson Engineering,Inc. NEW 4"PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE Wbit LaRoad hite Bea r Lake,MN 55110 651.481.9120(1)651.481.9201 4 W Iarsonengccom ' WIRE MESH REINFORCEMENT ©2014 Larson Eigineedng.Inc.a1 rynts reserves. (OPTIONAL) I Hereby certify Mat this plan,spe fications or ENGINEERING FABRIC report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that am a dutylicensed 6"BASE Professional Engineer under Me laws of the state of Minnesota. AGGREGATE METAL,WOOD POST,OR STAKE. V MAX.SPACING,2'INTO GROUND. FABRIC ANCHORAGE Greg A.8uchal,P.E. TRENCH.BACKFILL WITH Date: Reg.No.: - TAMPED NATURAL SOIL APPROVED SUBGRADE SOIL DIRECTION CLIENT OFpF R�::_: CONCRETE PARK NICOLLET TRUTHERS 2 CONSTRUCTION DETAIL PARK NSON S cs NOT TO SCALE NATURAL SOIL CENTER NOTE:DEPENDING UPON CONFIGURATION,ATTACH FABRIC TO WIRE MESH WITH HOG RINGS,STEEL POSTS WITH WIRES,OR WOOD POSTS WITH STAPLES. PROJECT DESCRIPTION SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN 8" 18 OUTWARD TE:TIP GUT-TER SEE AS APPLICABLE SILT FENCE EXPANSION& FOR RESTORATION 6" SEE GRADING PLAN INSTALLATION DETAIL RENOVATION ___ SLOPE NEW BITUMINOUS 6 III—_III �. PAVEMENT CS NOT TO SCALE L—III—I ILII ,�,j a FILTER AREA IC..5 FTs CITY GOLDEN VALLEY ✓' OVERFLOW AREA 0.6 FTa MAXIMUM OVERFLOW RATE(Q 7•HEAD) 3.00 CF5 :. NEW BASE MAXIMUM OVERFLOW RATE(Q 13•HEAD) J4.00 CF5 STATE MINNESOTA AGGREGATE BASKET WEIGHT(EMPTY) 1 LB _ BASKET WEIGHT(FULL-APPROX.) 170 L35 ISSUE DATES 6" APPROVED SUBGRADE SOIL B618 CONCRETE CURB &GUTTER DETAIL a -- NOT FOR cs NOT TO SCALE CONSTRUCTION m00000a lassoo ossa ae osooel 'eoeesl loo oast sees 00000 Ia000 eoaoo a00000 ease sa000 oases seoo sees Isseoe ssaoe �`�' �eoeeal eae0o o0eo 0000 SIDE VIEW ------' FRONT VIEW DO DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 10;372074 4001EA.LN SO SCHEMATIC DESIGN 10�➢Z2014 FILTER BAG IN EACH BASKET MARK DESCRIPTION GATE % INFRASAFEINLET PROTECTION DEVICE (OR EQUAL) PROJECT NO: 12146144 c P" �° C5 DRAWN BY: PSM � FF Or NOT TO SCALE *' r0 2° CHECKED BY: GAB/KRR COPYRIGHT: Qonane.'a. aN oma r.,.rv.e„a,u..au0a o. AF DRAWING TITLE RAC9 SOA O"Gr rO rz DETAILS AFa A(^ 4 ACCESSIBLE RAMP DETAIL O5 NOT TO SCALE C5 NEW BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT 12"HEAVY DUTY SOLID LID (NEENAH R-6662-BP OR APPROVED EQUAL) trr.TEAPC APPROVED MANHOLE STEPS SHALL BE PLACED AGGREGATE SO THAT OFFSET HOLE IN TOP SLAB BASE IMMMMMM IS FACING DOWNSTREAM. ®®® APPROVED COMPACTED BACKFILL BACKFILL 12'CLEANOUT (DEPTH VARIES, IEEE 701.258.3116 FM 701.223.7983 SEE GRADING PLAN) 116 W Main Ave,Suite A,Bismarck ND 58501 _I I __ Grmtl Forte NO Fergo ND 84vner•A ND - Asliston ND I.-No I NornchI Be '*MN li—Ales ARG 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O p 0 0 0 0 0 0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000000000 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 p p 0 0 0 o2'D 0 0 0 0000000000000000 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0�0 0 0 0 0 000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000000 0 0 0 0 0 00000000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000 0 0 Opo°O 0 0 0 0 0 0000000 0 0 0000000000000 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000020 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00000°0 W • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0°0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ° ° °0 0 0 0°0°o 00-0000000000000 0 0°0° °0°o°0°0°0 g'00'.0".0opoo o°o°o°o°o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000000000000000 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 °00000 12*PERFORATED HDPE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000 0000000020 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0„ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00000000000 D O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 GRADE 1'BELOW 10'TRANSITION. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00op -000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 cm 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ° 0 0 0 0 ° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0c 0 0 0 0 0 00000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O U 0000000.000 0 0 Larson 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p p p p p p p p p p p p 0 0 0 0 000000000 12'PERFORATED 000 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000COMPACTED COARSE PLAN MANHOLE FRAME 8 COVER: 000000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 HDPE(INLET) 000000000000000000°o0000pop °°°°o°o°o°°°° 12"PERF. 0°000000po 000°00.°0° 0'.o...0'.o. FILTER AGGREGATE NEENAH R-3067,TYPE V GRATE 0000000000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000000000 0 0 pp°p°p°p°p°ppppppppp�pppppp pppppp 00000.0000 HDPE(OUTLET) pppppppppp Op00000 0000 000Engineering,Inc. INV=924.50 00000000000°0000.000000000.0 000000000000000 o000op000 000000.000. 0000000000 000000000 0 0 0 0 ° 0 ° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3524 Labore Road 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MINIMUM OF 2,MAXIMUM OF 5 .O.O.O.O.0.0.0.000.0.0.0.0 O .00000000000.0.0. INV=924.50 0-0.0.00000 0'09-09g.'00.0'. .0.0.00000 While Bear Lake,MN 55110 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 ° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 CONCRETE ADJUSTMENT RINGS WITH FULL 0 0 0 0 0°0°0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0-0-0 0 0°0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 000 0 o 2.09009 0 0 651.481.9120 651.481.9201 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ° 0 ° o 0 0 0 o BED OF MORTAR BETWEEN EACH AND (� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 00 0 0 0 °0'o 0 o00000000 0 ° 00 oo0 0' O o 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -06900000000000.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ° 0 0 0 0°0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A 4"COLLAR ON THE OUTSIDE.NO SHIMS www-larsonengr.com 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OF ANY MATERIAL ALLOWED. ©2014 Larson Englneedng,Inc.All rynls reserved. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OVERLAP NON-WOVEN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ���.� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 °0000.0.0000000.000 801E SEPARATION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o0.0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0° p o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 by certify that this plan,3padfuYtiOns or 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 00.000000.0..0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000000. 0 0 0 0 0 0 COARSE FILTER I here 0 0 0 0 0 0 o FABRIC MIN I2" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 00000 0 0 0 0 o 6'PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE SLAB. yme or under my direct 0.0.00000.0.0.0000 . 00. . 0.0.0.0.000.0.000 0000. 000.0.0000 AGGREGATE Y report was prepared b 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3'TO 1 CRUSHED b 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SEAL WITH 2 BEADS OF RAM-NEK. supervision I En that I un a r t licensed 00000000000000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ( a'' I p°O°Op0p0p0p0p0p0 000 °Op0p0p0p0°0°0.0.0.-0 000.0 o°OpOpp°p° .•p - Prolessionel Engineer under Ma laws of Ma state 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ALL JOINTS IN MANHOLE TO HAVE W Minnesota. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000000000000000000000000.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 •• t.�. 0 0 0 0 0 0 ° 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 'O'RING RUBBER GASKETS. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36"PERFORATED PE PIPE 7 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 -0 o c' 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 () 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000000000 0 0 '00'.' 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0' c 0 0 0 0 0000000 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 00000 MANHOLE STEPS,COPOLYMER POLYPROPYLENE 0 00,000 .0o 0 0 0 0 0 0Greg A.Buchal,P.E. in N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0°0 0 0 0°0 0 0 0 0°0°0°0 000,0-0,0 0°0° ° ��� .`- `�•.-"•:•�" •' S'MiN. PLASTIC,WITH 112"GRADE 60 STEEL 9 ° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 00000..0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 o 000 0 000 ° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0' O o 0 0 0 REINFORCEMENT OR EQUAL,16"O.C. Date: Reg.No.: 000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24"x 24"z e"CONCRETE BLOCK 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o p o 0 0 0 o Cl o 0 o 0 0 0.0000 0 000000000 NON-WOVEN SOIL VARIABLE o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w 00 ° °0°0°0°0°0°0°0 o°o°o°o°o°o°o°o°o°opo°o°0'o o°o°o°o 01000000 000000000° ° ° ° PRECAST CONCRETE SECTION 000'. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SEPARATION FABRIC m CLIENT 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 ° 0 0 o O o o 0 0 0 c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ° 000a 0000000 0 0 0 0 o p o ° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RAP COARSE FILTER OUTLET 00 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 00000000 o M' ° ° ppppp Dpp ° ° ° ° ° D ° ppDp p -0Dp pPARK NICOLLET 0000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000AGGREGATE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o p o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o p o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O p 0 > ° ° ° ° ° 0000 ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° °°° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° CLEANOUT DETAIL WATERTIGHTCONNECTION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O p p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . °° . p p p p p p 0 0 0°O°O . p p p p p p°O 0 0 O°000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 i(. (BOOT.TVPICAL) STRUTHERS 00000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . p p p p p p p p 0 0 0 °o°o°opo°o°o°opopo°o°opopopo 0 0000.000.0.o.00000000000.0.0.0000 0 0 0 o INV=921.50 C6 NOT TO SCALE Q�Q 000°Op0pOp0°OpOpO°O°O°Opp°OpOpOpO°0000000000000°O°OpOpOpOpOpO°O°OpOpOpOpO °O°O°O°O°O°O°000.0° °O°O°O°O° �•P' PARKINSON'S 0000000 0000000 0000000000000.00000000000000000000000000000000000000000 000oo0°0p0°0°0p0oc%u 0 0 00°0 0 0,00,00, 00 °OpOp0p0pO000°O°Op 0.OpOpO° Opo°O°Opp°OpOp-000°O8 0°00°0°.° 0 CENTER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p p p O O O O O O O O O p 0 0 80T.OF AGG.=921.00 -- 0. PROJECT DESCRIPTION NOTE:CAP ALL STORAGE PIPE ENDS ENGINEER TO VERIFY THAT EXISTING IN-SITU CLEAN y SECTION A-A SAND(APPROVED HSG A)IS EXPOSED AT THE BASE OF EXPANSION& THE INFILTRATION TRENCH PRIOR TO BACKFILLING. RENOVATION UNDERGROUND INFILTRATION i AND STORAGE SYSTEM DETAIL W MINUS WASHED STONE BEDDING C6 NOT TO SCALE n CATCH BASIN MANHOLE DETAIL clTr GOLDEN VALLEY 12"HEAVY DUTY SOLID LID /—NEW PAVEMENT C6 NOT TO SCALE (NEENAH R.6662-BP OR APPROVED EQUAL) STATE MINNESOTA ISSUE DATES NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION w COMPACTED BACKFILL rn m DD DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 10:01201d SO SCHEMATIC DESIGN 10.0712014 ti MARK DESCRIPTION DATE a w 12"CLEANOUT PROJECT NO: 12146144 DRAWN BY: PSM COMPACTED COARSE FILTER AGGREGATE CHECKED BY: GABIKRR 0 0 COPYRIGHT: STORAGE PIPE o°0°0°O°0°0° ol.,...F"deraw�,..�.m•e a..e.N aw.,w.,,,e are 0000000000p0p M.p +e.a wwc 000 00000 poo a,.ea,r „a..sa..,.�..,M.aI. 00 00 0 ^ a 0 DRAWING TITLE STORMWATER DETAILS STORMWATER STORAGE PIPE z CLEANOUT DETAIL C6 NOT TO SCALE TREE PRESERVATION NOTES 7, See Landscaping Plan for tree replacement and restoration. r EAP C TREES REMOVED BASE BID 1 DECIDUOUS --® ALTERNATE NO.1 4 DECIDUOUS ®®® ALTERNATE NO.1 2 SPRUCE ALTERNATE NO.2 1 DECIDUOUS TELE 707.258.3718 FAK 701.223.7983 \� ALTERNATE NO.2 1 OAK 4Jy ALTERNATE NO.3 0 116 W Main Ave.Suite A,Blamarck NO 56501 1 r TOTAL 9 c,eea F pNo -NO r&ie VT �oO�O J tTj at` aemSUInMN I aueron Ain ARG Gj .0�R / WWW.eapC-net S890745 E COUNTRY i 4579 CLUB R 22309 qq_ _ X27 DRIVE — Larson 5890745 E,, 1 - (a-Jxsze fi`;'. " — (o-srrvlt i7JPuD V Engineering,Inc. 19 _ '— .,-+J-,r .2- .`T. _ ,5 3524 Labore Road 45 57 {._I_. '7 azr„r White Bear Lake MN 55110 J +. _1 _ ,.c - 19201 � .-'.`- - ”` -r _ 651.481.9120(f)651.481.9201 r. e. - TER�� , www.larsonengr.co� 1 _ - _ ©20161--En >• I _�.:.' y ��� gneadng Inc All breservea. `. :1 �: .-.'::•', - '- -- _ 1 hereby cenify that this pian.specfficaCons or J ` _ T` , 1 - •••,a•• port—pr Pared bym undarmydirect I la 1 ' supervl:ion and that I am a duly licensed ' 1 u j �� II 1 ALT.NO 1 REMOVAL .e- Profess anal Engineer under the lam ofthe state (DECIDUOUS TYP OF 6) -Y _ ! _ I i f't ! I �/ f.„ _"' of Minnesota. {a (I i•� ALT.NO.i REMOVAL �, (SPRUCE, OF 2) _ I '� II•'-. Greg A.Buchal,P.E. k �� 1 I Data: Rag.No.: � Z-------� 1� ! ,} CLIENT 4 I•': A f ,, ._ _ � Tao j` -r PARK N1 COLLET R s t v STRUT PAJ HERS SON S a CENTER t z.j � 1 1141 L....... .J 4. 1 F Ir r ALTERNATE N0.3 ' PROJECT DESCRIPTION COLORED CONCRETE r 1 ° j'i-" 1 ENTRANCE REPLACEMENT -'(.: I 1 `i 11 '�._ !G t f� , RENOVATOION I 6 ) ,) t i 1 A F �a = �_ _�_ .L _ I clrYJ. GOLDEN VALLEY I STATE MINNESOTA o I _ .._._ .. _....,._ __,.. . z 2 = ISSUE DATES I � NOTFOR t .�= rl I z'z I CONSTRUCTION 14 1 , ALTERNATE NO.2„ ----r---moi "-. } f W DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 70tJ7/2014 SO SCHEYA71CDESIGN 1010!11014 MARK DESCRIPTIONDATE 1 `i Tit- 1 t;i �'� � L. PROJECT NO: 12146144 I 1 a s ALT.11 REMOVAL 41 ' 1 =(DEclDuous) I' 'LIr I DRAWN BY: PSM rar I BASE BID REMOVAL ✓ ALT.NO.2 REMOVAL (DECIDUOUSI` a CHECKED BY: GABIKRR ; A (OAK) ') �� 1 yW„ COPYRIGHT: fl� °Y e' %^•^ ..W 19380 _ 1 a' "�o1 EZ a. •57Qf' �fia9.� .J w m.m " a n.F�Fa is DRAWING TITLE `C L,70.0 j6 112 R 1'21 TREE PRESERVATION PtA» (ya71 s> PLAN NORTH 0 15 30 60 T1 .0 TREE SIZE SPECIES TREE SIZE SPECIES TREE SIZE SPECIES TREE SIZE SPECIES TOTAL=59(MULTIPLY BY 30%)=17.7 Allowable tree removal. 1. 24" OAK 19. 6 SPRUCE 37. 16' BOX-ELDER 55. 28' SPRUCE Actual Sig.Trees Removed=3 2. 28" OAK 20. 6' SPRUCE 38. 16' BOX-ELDER 56. 18' SPRUCE Mitigation required=No ART E A P C 3. 24' SPRUCE 21. 10" OAK 39. 16' BOX-ELDER 57. 18' SPRUCE ci. i 4. 24' SPRUCE 22. 10" BOX-ELDER 40. 30" BOX-ELDER 58. 24' BOX-ELDER 5. 36" OAK 23. 8" OAK 41. 8" BOX-ELDER 59. 18' SPRUCE 6. 20' OAK 24. 10' OAK 42. 20" BOX-ELDER Joan MacLeod,ASLA,LEED AP 7. 12" BOX-ELDER 25. B" OAK 43. 28' SPRUCE Landscape Architect#43234 November 6,2014 8. 24' OAK 26. 24" OAK 44. 18' SPRUCE 9. 24" OAK 27. 10" OAK 45. 8" BOX-ELDER 10. 22' OAK 28. 10" OAK 46. 14" BOX-ELDER nRE 701.258.3116 Fm 701.223.7983 11. 26' OAK 29. 24" OAK 47. B" BOX-ELDER ns w Mam Ave,sNaa A,Bismarck No seso, 12. 6' SPRUCE 30. 18" OAK 48. 10'BOX-ELDER 13. 4' SPRUCE 31. 24' OAK 49. 10" BOX-ELDER G,a IPeds ND Forge ND ew a ND 14. 4' SPRUCE 32. 26" OAK 50. 10' BOX-ELDER W, -No I Mimt NO I Ne,wia,yr 15. 6' SPRUCE 33. 10" OAK 51. 8" BOX-ELDER Bendtlji MN 8uems Apes ARG 16. 24" OAK 34. 12" BOX-ELDER 52. 4' BOX-ELDER 17. 24' OAK 35. 14" BOX-ELDER 53. 8" BOX-ELDER www.eapc.net 18. 18" OAK 36. 46" OAK 54. 8" BOX-ELDER w ZZ p C \� + 3 < v - 6 *i7,.; 6 0 Y - \ G2Jh�' < eI CLIENT PARK NICOLLET 9 STRUTHERS ® .;%I PARKINSON'S �F-----E E '9�rµf E EE I� " -- E- CENTER ,yy PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1- PATHWAY ALIGNMENT WILL BEADJUSTE (�` ti46 - 21 2 13 1 ,C_n 6 EXPANSION 8f TOAVOIDSIGNIFICANTTREES pa �� \ _ ----_-- -- ) 0 RENOVATION CITY GOLDEN VALLEY to r STATE MINNESOTA 81 ISSUE DATES 63 1 s46.�a f 49 15 x. PA P.U.O.APPLICATION ,1062016 - .... -... I _ r !1 - .a® ! •" r '. ` I AMRK DESCRIPTION 1DATE ) PROJECT NO: 20144100 m REMOVE TREE 1 I DRAWN BY: LS 1-` 1 `� � �+ CHECKED BY: JM COPYRIGHT: + REMOVE � i I DRAWING TITLE ''• _ < - - - ��. REMOVE TREE ! _ ! ) !" t � •�� ! mt� TREE PRESERVATION ,:".%.`� 9046 O``.:I "os .�° I`b • `O ' ' .�.- n a, 0 7 I t 11I PLAN IF If " I TREE PRESERVATION PLAN D s' 16' 32' 1 1'=16b O DEMOLITION NOTES: Q REMOVE EASTING EXTERIOR WALL AS REWIRED FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION,SEE r E A P C SHEET A2DI-MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN FOR NEW CONSTRUCPOPL Q2 REMOVE EXISTING PARTITION IN ITS ENTIRETY. OR WALL FOR NEW NDOW SHEETEA2D1 MAIN LEVELOF STING FLOOR PLANT AND SHEET A401 EIXTERIOROPENING, ELEVATIONS. REMOVEEXISTINGDOOR.FRAME&HARDWARE.TURN OVER TO OMER THOSE ITEMSEQUEST ®®® D. EfAM i EXAM III fX<t1 EAAd i EY" f EXAM 1' II I (' i O -� ✓~�. +t i j vESTI6ULE j © REMOVE EXISTING REMOVE EMSTING FCASEWORK.WISH TSE 701336.3116 Fnx 701.223.7663 i4( .... II 1'•.. ...\ p __._ 1 i _.s1 j +B'-8 I Q7 REMOVE EXISTING PLUMBING FIXTURE,SEE MECHANICAL DRAWINGS. 116 W MRIR A-,Sufb A,IIIamR&ND 5&501 II. F�WG ✓ \O y rr REMOVE EXISTING BORROWED UTE B i L�3si r.,V'ii pf I REMOVE AND RELOCATE TWO ADJUSTABLE SHELVES TO TOP HALF OF TALL STORAGE H°H0 I LS ARO I�A�o CABSTORINET AND AGE CABINET,SEECREATE INPULL-OUT TERIOR ELEVATIONSFOR NEW LOCATION.RAWERS AT BOTTOM HALF OF TALL -- pI .;Dr I� I _ I I --_ V' I RI 10 REMOVE AND RELOCATE EXISTING RECESSED ELECTRICAL PANELS,SEE ELECTRICAL WWw.eapc.net DESIGN/BUILD DRAWINGS it Ewu 1 i .bl REMOVE EXISTING DOOR FRAME&HARDWARE.SALVAGE FOR REINSTALLATION. 1 oF. I: �' _L .. 1 '.^i....' �j ENTRY u+� SEE A201 rl I 1 i 0+8'-8'. J 12 REMOVE EXISTING CUBICLE CURTAINCE UNG TRACK. I 'P. An5 FAMILY L FiCE SERFICES ) 3 d i� 13 REMOVE EXISTING EXTERIOR WINDOW. 4. E✓�M II of I.ooATs'� 14 REMOVE EXISTING PERIMETER AN TUBE RADIATION,SEE MECHANICAL DESIGN/BUILD I :i PECeaRcn _I. I Q+8-B" coPY 1+ DRAWINGS. RE.EAP H OPEETEP -t 1' r: n RESOURCE i LIBRARY T FT TME" 4-6• O 4B'-6 3/4 I II \ q NUy'iE P.ESEARCn .:F OffiC"F ! OFFICE ST-f Ik C OCRCINATORS I \ li � I CtPT.r I VENOIMO - O °E)NA RESEARCH�( I i ICOfFc6 If�� CLIENT ' d HALLWAY HALLWAY II ql_ 'L z ' PARK NICOLLET i)I T �.,T°LET l O 2 • •-� 2 STRUTHERS , i:.- -1 iYQ��/- t� :� PARKINSON'S OFFICE/ CHART M SHONYER i OFFICE I TAPE�' x PYA — CENTER ;�+8'-8' { MEQ 1.� x 6-8"�. C.i-c , �`- 1Q Q+8 8 1 :sds1 {'I I' - RECORO'3 _ 1 ( I I ' oFFK:e T^ ° +6'-6' PROJECT DESCRIPTION I .___ _; "� i�'I i.T.-..- y.l" ,I 1 +8•.' IjjQ 8 TOILET i MEli9 '.- EXPANSION& I, I �,e_6 {I TOILET i 4 n�) �, RENOVATION 1,IL _J� 1• REHABILITATION IO -JI i I RETAIL M' I �[J�J —T^ 'T TELE I°�' f.— F s R r STOKE li',rn STORAGE (I CO axe.JKLE: spa _.. 9..,, _ ZERO E b f7(SKYLIGHT Cm GOLDEN VALLEY i / ii IflOCE SIN iI y-E REf� KIT4nEN I 'IX�. �I 215 DL m REMAIN l' STATE MINNESOTA I�' SCHEDULE OF EXISTING FINISHES { HALLWAvBASE WALL WALL CEILING PECEI cc / kllNIlH) FINISH FINISH MATERIAL FINISH FINISH rnrx HALLwnv / , CL—) ISSUE DATES NUMBER CARPET VRIri GTP BD PLANT ACT ,3_. ._:.-,:=1 X04 J t .• •L 4'-8' 4'-4 0� ,a. I I CL—) NNri VINYL GW BD PAINT ACT MUSIC Q THERAPY �I OFFICE MNtt� MNri GW BD PAINT/CT ACT 1 J SPEECH Oj I HER— ��_ _ F- y SPEECH i TOFFICFJ +B'-10 1/2' J -'-'--�', O ,1 O CARPEr/CT CT GYP BD PAINT ACT E%AM CftEATEDAY { 'I IL I PROORAM r ©`✓� T :_. ..n Oi 4B'—r ARCHITECTURAL SYMBOLS ,,�f � /�/� Y• L. i i. D.MtX,ATION D870 S�T-tl�L WAI I LCf1U I I ,_ I,a,g._—.__._: �t �.�= I _._. ..:...� � _ EXISTING TO RFIAAMI 4 �' P MARK OF.BCRIPfION DATE 7 SET UP, { MOV 6MENT �' r PROJECT NO: 20144100 EXERCISE I EXISTING TO BE REMOVED sTUDIo DRAWN BY: RGH RELAXATION ART {�j JamI ARTS THERAPY .r. -. .-' Y II CLASSROOM 8UP%JES '� I I CL I.T.IIAE CLASSROOM O+g-r @WM_TAG. CHECKED BY: RK ROOM NAME 0 �� COPYRIGHT: u +8-11 - �CEEING ELEVATION 8 i 1 1 I I N I I f ` FINISH NUMBER Ji f DRAWING TITLE MAIN LEVEL DEMOLITION r PLAN -------------- A101 MAIN LEVEL DEMOLITION PLAN ` / z 1 � A1BI G E A P C 41'-0" �a1 (I i, I' I II I /- ♦ ^: ! I `�' 1 I\ JELE 701.258.3116 I'm 701.426.7065 f '. \ WitI ewA.w A..su.A8wMrrk ND 557VES 4 I 1 CORR ,-...,7 aI.m FRno tm F+ww 91n�t w I t vt�en ND t=rNLND I tbwlvr '" 9„q rrJ I B�.t�.Au..A9D is `•' 1 ' . . II sDALE l l xIEDs 1 r,l e I ' EDUCATION I WWW.eapc•net i 1 IrrI ALCOiF 1 I --� 1 j ROOM 11 I I' I: Euw �I - `7 I� I'D f PFGeARCH ".,,J ..� - + ; J� ' PTH'N .,3 .••/3 ENT I-tDI J 'f ti,... I I / II CONFERENCE cKFfcE s e 1-101 _ I 105 ' I I RESEARCH GPEE;cR r I (I I { r— ? T; GATHERING�.......�� / TC LE' TOILET SPACE ♦ tJ4)HSE PE.EARCLi AEF. Lii LANDSCAP SEATING ) Yi y �-- -� GFFKE CFFICE 1 oTA f L- It9B BED _ i I SILENT COORDINATORS WATER I \ II I I t VROXG n1I DUAL SIDED FEATURE V " li II CLAAJ I LL G_LLc OFFICE •I II 1 P.EEARCH/ (COFFf.E CLIENT ht07 iI ii 11 '� ! LANDSCAPE IID ` n9A1 AD WALL D PE PS TE PARK NICOLEET CORK j "TOILET II TOLE ;'I TOILET �'' PARKINSON hnz PARKINSON'S %� BRIDGE CENTER I OFFICE I (! HSKG`-lI. �- J`�' L(s]' -= HGo (' � rnJFeHEHCE REHABILITATION R1EC l.AL -' ' 1 '^ R_ Rcs < f t IRAP� STUDIO PROJECT DESCRIPTION OFFICE OFFICE I I-119 STEPS EXPANSION& .... TOILET TOILET� E 115 z RENOVATION Ij I-109 it li �I -,a n: RELY AJm i 7 1; PASSAGE I �II II I, ♦T . � `�X,• ., ueA I-118 n®\� SAY HF. i �f a_ C= I I-129 rr,11 _ F R h c124 IE REHAB 1 G'a yPR XKLER Ij.�HSK i CORR fqP EATMENT -TREATMENT :... LANDSCAPE 1_ - -F FAA I BO I _ -- I Ir h12{ I-123 DUAL SIDED FLOWER BED CITY GOLDEN VALLEY "'I'LJ L•JI GRAPHIC P. 3 II HC 35fNu ANi III F A-1 I.. I 1-12-3 J �l1 WALL ITCNeXTr P ` TABLE J AOL ..� ,J (�7(� WHEELCHAIRfSTATE MINNESOTA �♦ IL Y I T,� 1ANDSCAPE r� BENCN C 1 PECEIJ NG /J CORR ]0 I SEATING ht2z /� ISSUE DATES -li CORR I } =s =L I 2a f2, F SPEECH THERAPY - L 'OT n OFFICE/EXAM OT ADL _ �J EXAM r-'-I-126 r . � .amu --'T` 1L'_. 'LLr-J j I RETAIL T EQUIP I I I C.R.EAT.E. DAY STORAGE `- M PROGRAM I-ta2 _ THERAPIST I -� EXERCISE I. STATION EURS'CI'V hi2b WORKSTATION I.... PA P.UD.APPIK,A710N 11DYA1{ __. LA. SKM h136 j MARK DESpiWf1011 DATE PROJECT NO: 20144100 musicTHERAPY L HORTICULTURE _�+ RELAXATION DRAWN BY: RGH CLASSROOM �� CLASSROOM r el CLASSROOM ,t t „ CHECKED BY: RK I-133 li 1-174 �� i! 1-133 I COPYRI•a.o.�,,..v�w.. ---_� - `-''r' --- -'--- --a—. _.._. DRAWING TITLE I k MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN _ N A201 MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN tk A[EAPC s®® 701389.3119 Fac 701.223.7983 119 W Mein Av,SuBe A.Bim mk NO 58507 Onn,Fvlo NOFr NO Blnrdc NO W 140 L NO NwM Ji Vf BnW9 MN I Bury A'w ARO www.eapc.net I —PREFIN MIL COPING FACE BRICK EL,11'-B 3 B' -_ ',—FACE TOP MAS ` ANODIZE AL SUN CONTROL 1 ........ I t AL STOREFRONT SYSTEM -------------- --------------------------- EL ------------ -------- --------- - (( [�lT EL, TEEFACE BRICK EASTING NEW ADDITION' CLIENT 3 SOUTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION PARK STRUTHERS ET ll� ERS a' JIB` p PARKINSON'S CENTER PROJECT DESCRIPTION EXPANSION& RENOVATION PREFIN MTI.COPING FACE ERIC CITY GOLDEN VALLEY TOP 3� PA -" - STATE MINNESOTA ACCENT BRICK BAND TO MATCH E%: ISSUE DATES EL 100-0 NEW EASTING ADDITION z NORTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION PA P.UD.APPl1CATI0N 1fA1bZD1/ MARK DESCRJFrION DATE PROJECTNO: 20144100 DRAWN BY: RGH CHECKED BY: RK COPYRIGHT: ly 2 PREFIN MTL COPING A�az SPANDREL GLASS ANODIZE AL SUN CONTROL---, SM TDP MAS DRAWING TITLE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS • j A401 FACE BRICK I AL STOREFRONT SYSTEM p1 FRAME M DOW 8 f i CLEAR GLASS NEW EASTING 3 E%1511NG NEW SLIDING AL FRAMED SLOPED BRICK SILL ADDITON � ADDIRON GLASS DOORS } EAST EXTERIOR ELEVATION A ,/B'.I.-0. trr.TEAPC 1 TABLES&CHAIRS,REFER TO SITE FURNISHING SPEC. i '\, 1 I v TELE 701.258.3tt6 Frx 70t.22a3.7983 i 16 VI in Ave,Suite A,Bismarck NO 56501 II 1 I _ Forks ND Fargo NO B'..ND WH. N ,� I -� 4 I Bue,waPlrcs ARG I Nomkli VT 8emw"m. 1 I � www.eapc.net IF 1 22"HGT.MODULAR BLOCK WALL -__� C}l I j CONCRETE PAVING7 LI 11 1 PHASE 1 ADD ALTERNATE-BONDED AGGREGATE PAVING,REFER TO SPEC. I I ADA COMPLIANT RAMP . BENCH ON CONCRETE PAD, TYP.REFER TO SITE }- ^i I FURNISHING SPEC \ C E '2kY �g�i�yp I � I I 67 I - I ADA COMPLIANT RAMP ° �, NOV 0 7 2014 1 1 11 ' ILJ FA 1 \ OCLIENT \\ \\ I PARK NICOLLET STRUTHERS PARKINSON'S 1 1 CENTER 1 1 I PHASE 1 LIMITS I I su 1 ' 1 PHASE I ADD ALTERNATE-yONDED N ! I I PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1 / / AGGREGATE PAVING,REFEV TO SPEC. 1 FUTURE PHASE-COLORED i EXPANSION& 11 2- / / 1 '\ CONCRETE PAVING AT BUILDIN I lyRE ENTRANCE I RENOVATION Ty ;:1 _ ,..I I 1 PRECAST PLANTER 11 I { 1 I ° WITH SCREEN-3/1-5.0 I 41 1 I RAISED GARDEN ,, 1 PLANTER,CEDAR s ,1 TREXDECKING a INTERIOR GARDEN—1/1-1.1 .�411 -. I l I CITY GOLDEN VALLEY r------------------------1 1# ff '. FUTURE FUTURE-BRIDGE-111-5.1 a GARDENSTORAGE I t �:{ Tl 1 I-'__15_`I I STATE MINNESOTA 1 \ \ UNDER DECK-5/1-5.01, BENCH,TYP - r.... gl ISSUE DATES * '' ARBOR STRUCTURE 21L5.1 'I \ I I ( NOT FOR \ \ r CONSTRUCTION 11 I\ -.I i - �' E ✓ \ — i' - \j. 22'HGT.MODULAR BLOCK WALL li ;1 : I ". f REMOVE PARKING 1 1 I FILL WITH CONCRETE CURB, II I • --—————--———— \ SIDEWALK TO PATIO 1 { _ ELEVATED PEDESTRIAN1 I 1. 1 CROSSWALK 1 DD DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 10171!2074 i • I I SD SCHEMkTICDESIGN 10/07/2014 1 CONCRETE PAVING,TYP. f • 1 III, Z I I IIA MARK DESCRIPTION DATE II PROJECT NO: 20144100 BENCH ON STONE FOUNTAIN-M1-5.0 PROPERTY LINE�— I PLANTERS,SEE SITE CONCRETE PAD,TYP. PRIVACY FENCE-611-5.0 ti FURNISHING SPEC DRAWN BY: RGH CHECKED BY: RK COPYRIGHT: - -�'� DRAWING TITLE LANDSCAPE PLAN / I i L1 .0 0 8' 16' 32' 1 LANDSCAPE LAYOUT PLAN Q Trr.T E A P C - r------------- _ --------FUTURE I 1 I ® ® 1 I I ! t i ! 1 1 I 118 W Man Ave,Suite A13smar kND 58501 i I I 1 i I 1 I G— .ND Fargo ND BismarckN D BemN1M.ND I B.—n' AIms ARG I ! i Vt i �• www.eaPc.net 1 I + PERENNIAL MASSING,'�YP. ° i •. �.. 'i. "— SHRUB MASSING,TYP.i 1 ! I RESTORE ALL DISTURBED I TURF GRASS WITH TURF SOD,TYP. I 1 li i U C I Ilt.• i sv .. 1IN, I II 1 I 1 �•' DECIDUOUS SHADE I CLIENT TREE,TYP. DECIDUOUS I PARK NICOLLET ORNAMENTAL TREE,TYP. STRUTHERS 1 ! i PARKINSON'S + + I CENTER i ! i RAIN GARDEN �® I PROJECT DESCRIPTION N EXPANSION& �UT<URE RENOVATION IJ INTERIOR GARDEN PLANTING-111-2.1 i I CITY GOLDEN VALLEY ---------------------- 1 1 STATE MINNESOTA ° �IFUTURE 1�i F � ,. i�,r I ISSUE DATES I 1 I + ° RAIN GARDEN I NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ------------ DESr.N DOPMENi 1013,2019 SD SCHEMATICDESIGN IUDZM14 MARK I DESCRIPTION DATE —— -I - PROJECT NO: 20144100 DRAWN BY: RGH PERENNIAL MASSING,TYP. N CHECKED BY: RK COPYRIGHT: =Z1..1 co DRAWING TITLE LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLAN � 9T L2.0 0 8' 16' 32' LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLAN NOTES PLANTING LEGEND ROOT SIZE SPECIFICATIONS 1. ALL PLANT BEDS TO RECEIVE IRRIGATION. CONTRACTOR TO KEY QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME trl-r. EA PC CONT. VERIFY LIMITS OF EXISTING SYSTEM AND PROVIDE SHOP DRAWINGS FOR NEW IRRIGATION LIMITS. ®®® 2. ALL PLANT BEDS TO RECEIVE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH, BETULANIGRA BIRCH,RIVER B&B 2.5"CAL.OR CLUMP 12'-14'HT.,TRUNK FREE OF BRANCHES F-T ® ® T'DEPTH. BETULA PAPYRIFERA'RENCI' BIRCH,RENAISSANCE REFLECTION B&B 3"CAL.OR CLUMP 14'-16'HT.,TRUNK FREE OF BRANCHES F-T 3. NEW PLANT BEDS TO RECEIVE PLANTING SOIL, MNDOT TOPSOIL POPL LUIS TREMULOIDES ASPEN,QUAKING B&B 2.5"CAL. 12'-14'HT.,TRUNK FREE OF BRANCHES F-T ae 701.258.3116 -701.223.7963 SELECT BORROW, 18"DEPTH. 116WMaIDAve,Sune A.Blsmamk NO58501 AMELANCHIER X GRANDIFLORA'AUTUMN BRILLIANCE' SERVICEBERRY,AUTUMN BRILLIANCE B&B 12'HGT. MULTI-STEM,12'-14'HT.,SEVEN OR MORE BRANCHES Gwd F,, ND Faq"ND ebnie,cR ND CORNUS ALTERNIFOLIA DOGWOOD,PAGODA B&B 2.0'CAL.OR CLUMP MULTI-STEM e�a 41 MN"a I N__G I Namil�w MALUS'SPRING SNOW' CRABAPPLE,SPRING SNOW B&B 2.0"CAL.OR CLUMP SINGLE-STEM MALUS'RED BARRON' CRAB APPLE,RED BARRON B&B 1.5'CAL. MATCHING COLUMNAR FORM www.eapc.net PYRUS USSURIENSIS'BAILFROST PEAR,MOUNTAIN FROST B&B 2.D'CAL, SINGLE STEM SYRINGA RETICULATA LILAC,JAPANESE B&B 2"CAL.OR CLUMP 8'-10'HT. AMELANCHIER LAMARCKII JUNEBERRY AMELANCHIER ALNIFOLIA'REGENT SERVICEBERRY,REGENT CONT. #5 PLANT 50.C. ARONIA MELANCOCARPA ELATA CHOKEBERRY,BLACK CONT. #5 PLANT 4'O.C. PRUNUS VIRGINIANA CHOKECHERRY CORNUS ALBA'AUREN DOGWOOD,PRAIRIE FIRE CONT. #5 PLANT 4'O.C. CORYLUS AMERICANA HAZELNUT,AMERICAN CONT. #5 PLANT T O.C. CEANOTHUS AMERICANUS NEW JERSEY TEA RISES ALPINUM'GREEN MOUND' CURRANT,ALPINE HYDRANGEA ARBORESCENS'ANNABELLE' HYDRANGEA'ANNABELLE' CONT. #5 PLANT4'O.C. VIBURNUM OPULUS VAR.AMERICANUM CRANBERRY,AMERICAN SYRINGA MEYERI'PALIBIN' LILAC,DWARF KOREAN CONT. #5 PLANT 4'O.C.OR AS INDICATED ON PLAN CLIENT VACCiNIUM CORYMBOSUM'PATRIOT HIGHBUSH BLUEBERRY PARK NICOLLET STRUTHERS ROSA ARKANSANA ROSE,PRAIRIE PARKINSON'S ASARUM CANADENSES WILD GINGER CENTER ALLIUM CERNUUM ALLIUM,WILD ONION PEROVSKIA ATRIPLICIFOLIA RUSSIAN SAGE CONT. #1 PLANT 2.6 O.C.(GROWS 42-H X 36"W) PROJECT DESCRIPTION PULMONARIA'RASPBERRY SPLASH' PULMONARIA'RASPBERRY SPLASH' CONT. #1 PLANT 2.0'O.C.(GROWS 12"H X 24"W) SALVIAXSUPERBA SALVIA,'MAINACHT CONT. #1 PLANT I.5'O.C.(GROWS 24-HX18"W) EXPANSION& ADIANTUM PEDATUM FERN,NORTHERN MAIDENHAIR RENOVATION CALAMAGROSTIS X ACUTIFLORA GRASS,FEATHER REED'KARL FOERSTER' CONT. #1 PLANT 2.60C. SCHEACHYRIUM SCOPARIUM GRASS,LITTLE BLUE STEM CONT. #1 PLANT 2.6 OC. SORGHASTRUM NUTANS'SIOUX BLUE GRASS,INDIAN'SIOUX BLUE CONT. #1 PLANT 2.6 OC. NOTE: CITY GOLDEN VALLEY CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN TREES IN A EUPHORBIA PULCHERRIMA POINSETTIA PLUMB POSITION THROUGHOUT WARRANTY CHRYSANTHEMUM MUM STATE MINNESOTA 3"COMPACTED ORGANIC PERIOD.WRAP TREE TRUNKS ONLY UPON MULCH.TO BE PLACED 60 DAYS APPROVAL BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. TULIP.a GREIGII TULIP AFTER TREE PLANTING UPON SEE SPEC.SECTION RELATED ISSUE DATES CUTTING OF 5 DIA SOD RING. TO EXT.PLANTING MULCH TO BE LEVEL WI FINISHED GRADE.DO NOT PLANT TREES WI ROOT FLARE VISIBLE AT TOP PLACE MULCH IN CONTACT OF ROOT BALL. IF ROOT FLARE IS NOT VISIBLE, NOT FOR WITH TREE TRUNK REMOVE SOIL IN A LEVEL MANNER FROM ROOT CONSTRUCTION BALL UNTIL FIRST MAIN ORDER ROOT(Y"DIA. OR LARGER)EMERGES FROM THE TRUNK. INTERIOR TROPICAL PLANTS SET MAIN ORDER ROOT 1"HIGHER THAN ADJ. GRADE.DO NOT COVER TOP REQUIRED EDGE CONDITION OF ROOT BALL WITH SOIL. TYPE& KEY QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME EXPOSED ROOT[ LIGHT SPECIFICATIONS EDI111IGN DEVELOPMENT 101111414 VARIES,SEE PLAN QUANTITY HEIGHT CONT. (FOOTCANDLES) SCHEMATIC DESIGN 10'072014 COMPACT PLANTING SOIL TO 85 MULCH RING WITH TOOLED DESCRIPTION DATE PERCENT OF MAX.DRY UNIT WT VERT.EDGE TO BE CUT TO 3"BELOW TREE FORM 25 ACCORDING TO ASTM D 698 FINISHED GRADE. PROJECT NO: 20144100 TA FICUS BINNENDIJKII'AMSTEL KING' FICUS TREE 8'-10'HT. CONT. SINGLE STEM,FULL HEALTHY CROWN DRAWN BY: RGH TB PTYCHOSPERMA ELEGANS PALM,ALEXANDER 10'-12'HT. CONT. TRIPLE TRUNK CHECKED BY: RK COPYRIGHT: TC ARAUCARIA HETEROPHYLLA PINE,NORFOLK ISLAND 3'-4'HT. CONT. FULL HEALTHY FORM A vwc r imuw"n"M .anm,W a�a FNC.FP➢C aN.,Man a REMOVE BURLAP,TWINE,�� III_ ROPE AND WIRE FROM _ SCARIFY SIDES OF TREE PIT TO STRELITZIA NICOLAI BIRD OF PARADISE 6'-8'HT. CONT. FULL HEALTHY FORM +"+ TOP HALF OF ROOT BALL I III—III_ I III I I WITH DE BY HAND TO SOIL TE CHAMAEDOREA SEIFRIZII PALM,BAMBOO 6'HT. CONT. FULL HEALTHY FORM BIND W THDRAWING TITLE UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE — SHRUB& LANDSCAPE NOTES& DIG PLANTING PIT 4"TO 6" TAMP SOIL AROUND ROOT BALL BASE GRASS FORM 500 PLANTING SCHEDULE DEEPER THAN ROOT BALL FIRMLY WITH FOOT PRESSURE SO PLACE ROOT BALL ON UNDISTURBED THAT ROOT BALL DOES NOT SHIFT SA KALANCHOE BLOSSFELDIANA KALANCHOE 12" CONT. INSTALL 12"O.C.(seasonal rotation plant) OR COMPACTED SOIL SB FICUS ELASTICA'DECORA BURGUNDY' RUBBER PLANT 24 CONT. INSTALL 16"O.C. SC ZAMIOCULCAS ZAMIIFOLIA ZANZIBAR GEM 18-24" ICONT. INSTALL 12"O.C. 1 TREE PLANTING DETAIL L3.0 L3.0 SCALE 112"=1'-0" PLANTING DETAIL-TREE,DWG a o BOUNDARY &TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY FOR: NCH-EXCLUSIVE ACCESS EASEMENT F04 ry0' y0 THE BENEFIT OF LOT 2 PER DOC.NO.4795752 �'o° PARK N I C O L L ET (ACROSS PAVED DRIVE CANES) �� y / ����A � ` A -__97E BENCNMARK:70P NUT aF HYDRANT ELEVARON-93at8 FEEL i //AA i;[N89s9"37F 4G5p PUT) NON-IXCLUSVE ACCESS EASEMENT FR'. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: I .-p Ao 589 7 E THE BENEFIT OF LOT 7 PER DOC.NO.479:752 /r/� u79 , COUNTRK " I CLUB a=073os (ACROSS PAVED DRIVE LANES) (Per Hennepin County Property Information Web Site) y �r e Y s ` N 1\,� 1 1 /� p' �qv R=231.9.2;"' Lot 1,Block 1, NEST METRO P.U.D.NO.39,Hennepin County,Minnesota. 1P s9s7'E use Pu -- -` _`- - ° \ i - =6.17 / Parcel No.32-118-21-42-0068 '� (�4326"L=ISI,4J PLA / N� . SB9'0745o-o2Jy9•L=ia JFZA7)�!! y 4b d-3 4519 Aw-PaN- 4 s 45.ST NZSt3&' Z2309:' aa1_ �/' i6Pa-` • R/VES/• It NOTES: IVJV 4� _ C .,,. .�+'"�' •,,::..vsp.�;-}, i d i _'t S �:�-, ^ ©`-..a' ."ew._`s"l 1�� 1. The orientation of this bearing system is based on the Hennepin County Coordinate Grid(NAD �. 83-96 Ad' i � `(/ ! i '• Au ��"� .._-��� _ .�` � i� � ♦ %'"r. �._ Tal F)� 10 FOOT DRARUG'f h I _ \ -` \ 'b'•PD, 1 2. The total area of the property described hereon is 102,046 square feet or 2.3427 acres. ✓ I a i,p t,Y URUTY EASEMENT PER labra ` - J-�.� \ 3 i` /`�� 9° P P Y 9u ,»: IwST METRO-P-UD.N0.3;}Y--A, _'r •, y �y /' . 1 `s- ':6• t ss�, - ,4r, L ice .. i 7 _ \ (� `yam ♦ 3. No title work was provided in the preparation of this survey to verify the existence of any ` 'I', easements or encumbrances to the ro erty.Drainage and utility easements shown hereon were taken from the plat of WEST METRO P.U.D.NO.39. i \ Y _ __ _ I6 PAleaw'SPAC6- Y\ 4. Existing utilities services and underground structures shown hereon were located eitherphysically, 99 `°p from existing records made available to us,by resident testimony,or by locations provided by y ,t ) _qt : P J �'r'"i6 of l '�; P� Gopher State One Cdl, per Ticket No. 143022237.However,lacking excavation,the exact location of I> 9e 0t--' 4 '6 °p" i Oxrea J^ ` ,q�; ) 91 j y9 �4�' ` $ ` J underground features cannot be accurately,completely and reliably depicted. Where additional or w --s 1-_- I I s °R more detailed information is required.the client is advised that ex ovation may b necessary. Other "_t I y \ ':J t a q I t s of c y evi �y Owx•) . utilities and services may be present and verification and location of all utilities and services should roNm Y !F� '4 P/req � be obtained from the owners of the respective utilities prior to any design,planning or excavation. i 4 / 4 /: "T�: / 5. The property described hereon Is subject to a Reciprocal Easement Declaration,recorded as p I �q S p d,p' gs � '� � , Y I,� � ;,�_ � � a aeA(4L. Document No. 4795752 contains easements as referenced by exhibit attached to said document. The r___ I •, I I } 1; I wwurwc Pwm location of said easements,which are not mathematical) defined,hove been noted on the survey. �� ,�! L` r.v °} p'•I I. .. 'I. F' 9 v S 4°' 4 K b !es By I54 Z Y n I / Y`� d— w ;Ery•, }, i•r '.\- *F.I i ,�N�a /Fq, a`° n °,, q ^+" `= 6. BENCHMARK: Top nut of the hydrant located at the intersection of Country Club Drive and 0 •'" ^ — ''i '°• m—e T t_ �)j L� ^l.,\ Jersey Avenue North.Elevation =924.39 feet(NAVD 88). o p _ I �.y ��` YAp ` -J--� I ✓_ 1 II !9 rp qI7, I I ry I -- a a " `�"A✓ LEGEND i 1 _ BUILDING N0. 6681 a I I 74 i \ i `` CO''l- �.o �) C _ ' I _a �— ✓ •! ��''� ® SANITARY MANHOLE O MANHOLE W n1 I ; WyiY d ar ? ®on® CATCH BASN icN ( e. BUILDING NO. 6701 �t,'y •. W W 'd ,ti° Q' ` / gd° I I ® WATER MANHOLE SN I COUNTRY CLUB ORIVF b AUTO SPRINKLER a GATE VALVE I•'?!4•ri,'_'i°h..y '1 i It)� I _� ' ¢ HYDRANT 30 i _• ,�, �' �"! S 0. q}}d' , �w /' ® MR CONDITIONER O �° I / 0 ELECTRIC MANHOLE 2 ' dA gp ,9° / / \ m ELECTRIC BOX `G, x w I ,�yy ' @ z, / r• tgq 9U " / ® HANDHIOLE METER 44,hr a LIGHT • ,•:5r ) �:,�.-�-:j'.i_. I I b. UTILITY POLE 0 ® COMMUNICATION BOXc 30 60 90 D GAS METER - 9GN 44- ) i t`, °° f 1 SCALE IN FEET HANDICAPPED i , I HANDICAPPED PARKING SPACE • FOUND IRON MONUMENT HANDICAPPED PARKING SIGN i 921 920�' i P: g j _x_ o E c x g I / /�.. / ( t t° 1- I SET IRON MONUMENT MARKED WEE w �— d' '•p sa / °1 / 6 Y WITH LICENSE NUMBER 44123 � )'T t!. 1 s SANITARY SEWER / a' -� ��,�, -� p ,---�I' i•i'vs/'�,'�� Wit" ���� rJ �\ / �, •'� wvLe FOUND NAIL —ss— STORM SENER �\ w WAIERMMN UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC 1 i y J S�� o , t / !:+ / /!, ?r, /-b'�_`�:.:_�._._ _ ��J ._•�'�_s I' -/.r ge' I —oxw— OVERHEAD WIRE UNDERGROUND BE OPTIC AeQ 4.72- �, ,f yy e a/ oa •/�// /4 e - ' _ 1_` R�/ P�� •+'� g'gs ' ! —s UNDERGROUND GASRH n SPOT ELEVATION E f°• I I I p•� `v' I vw i A __ __ _ ,10:. �-9Jo' -4n 9n / t, .- .Iti Ps•e.a� r -{! /JEXISTING CONTOUR UNE e... :.9JO szs-'S��•r �4 jt�` � tl,p>� .J` �_ 11 ✓ OR TREE Ori•;ea .� ��+•� I[- (L �4 / / 1 '�� -- BITUMINOUS SURFACE j `.qez . \ = •rrr.,q 'Jr. .i Fa" 1_i' i �._ J - CONCRETE SURFACE y s / YMrL ;4-o ?ate CERTIFICATION: a40 FOOT DRARIAGE a U7ll/TY-F.15ENENT PER,BEST MEMQ,P.U.D.Na J9 / ! I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Data of surve2 October 10,2014. Date of signo urs October 29, 2014. VE Brent R Peters Minnesota License No. 44123 P NOV 0 7 2014 FIELD BOOK PAGE FIELDWORK REVISIONS SURVEY FOR: PROPERTY ADDRESS: z6�o 4s CHIEF: L.S. N0. DATE DESCRIPTION 1229 Tyler Street NE,Suite 100 DRAWN BY: BOUNDARY AND Minneapolis,Minnesota 55413 DRAWING NAME: kgf PARK NICOLLET 6701 COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE ��' PHONE:(612)466-3300 36028-TOPO.dwO CHECKED TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY GOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55427 �L WWW.Ef612)466-3383 N5URVEY.COM BY: TI JOB NO. 36028 Egon, e(d NoWal(, InC. COPYRIGHT® 2014 By EGAN.FIELD k NOWAK,INC. FILE NO. 5463 BRP land surveyors since 1872 SHEET 1 OF 1 Citi' i k. ' golden MEMORANDUM valley Planning Department 763-593-80951763-593-8109(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting January 6, 2015 Agenda Item 4, D. Public Hearing- Ordinance #536 -Amending Section 11.03 Definitions, Section 11.35 Light Industrial Zoning District and 11.36 Industrial Zoning District regarding Recycling Centers Prepared By Emily Goellner, Associate Planner/Grant Writer Summary At the July 1, 2014, City Council meeting, a six month moratorium was approved that prohibited the establishment of any recycling centers in the Light Industrial and Industrial zoning districts. The Planning Commission discussed possible revisions to the Zoning Code at its meetings on October 13, November 10, and December 8. They have suggested the following considerations: 1. Create two definitions to replace current definition of Recycling Center including one definition for Recycling Drop-Off Facility and one definition for Recycling Facility. 2. In the Light Industrial zoning district, allow Recycling Drop-Off Facilities and Recycling Facilities as conditional uses. 3. In the Industrial zoning district, allow Recycling Drop-Off Facilities as permitted use and Recycling Facilities as a conditional use. Proposed Definitions Recycling Drop-Off Facility Recycling Facility A facility used for the collection, sorting, A facility used to prepare non-hazardous storage, and transfer of non-hazardous and and non-organic materials for reuse in non-organic materials for reuse in their their original form or for use in original form or for use in manufacturing manufacturing processes that do not processes that do not cause the destruction cause the destruction of the materials in a of the materials in a manner that precludes manner that precludes further use. further use. Recommended Permissions Light Industrial Industrial Recycling Drop-Off Facility Conditional Permitted Recycling Facility Conditional Conditional Outdoor Storage At the informal public hearing, the Planning Commission approved the proposal to prohibit outdoor storage at both types of facilities. After the informal public hearing, staff realized that the Light Industrial district and Industrial district may have the adequate regulations in existence; therefore, explicitly prohibiting outdoor storage for each of these uses in the Zoning Code may not be necessary. Language regarding outdoor storage and screening requirements are located in Subdivision 7 of the Light Industrial zoning district and Subdivision 7 of the Industrial zoning district, which are attached. Attachments • Planning Commission Minutes, dated December 8, 2014 (2 pages) • Planning Commission Minutes, dated November 10, 2014 (1 page) • Planning Commission Minutes, dated October 13, 2014 (3 pages) • Memo to Planning Commission, dated December 8, 2014 (4 pages) • Memo to Planning Commission, dated November 10, 2015 (4 pages) • Memo to Planning Commission, dated October 13, 2014 (4 pages) • City Code Section 11.03: Definitions, with underlined-overstruck language (1 page) • City Code Section 11.35: Light Industrial Zoning District, with underlined-overstruck language (3 pages) • City Code Section 11.36: Industrial Zoning District, with underlined-overstruck language (2 pages) • Ordinance #536 (2 pages) • Zoning Map (1 page) Recommended Action Motion to adopt Ordinance #536 Amending Section 11.03 Definitions, Section 11.35 Light Industrial Zoning District and 11.36 Industrial Zoning District regarding Recycling Centers. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission December 8, 2014 Page 6 3. Informal Public Hearing —Zoning Code Text Amendments —Amending Sections 11.03 Definitions, 11.35 Light Industrial Zoning District, and 11.36 Industrial Zoning District—ZO00-95 Applicant: City of Golden Valley Purpose: To consider amendments to the Zoning Code regarding Recycling Centers. Goellner reminded the Planning Commission that the City Council passed a moratorium regarding recycling facilities in order to consider potential changes to the definition of recycling centers as well as the appropriateness of recycling centers as permitted uses within the Light Industrial and Industrial zoning districts. Goellner stated that staff is recommending two new definitions, one for a drop-off facility and one for a recycling facility as follows: Drop-Off Facility - A facility used for the collection, sorting, storage, and transfer of non-hazardous materials for reuse in their original form or for use in manufacturing processes that do not cause the destruction of the materials in a manner that precludes further use. Compost and yard waste are prohibited materials and Recycling Facility - A facility used to prepare non-hazardous material for reuse in their original form or for use in manufacturing processes that do not cause the destruction of the materials in a manner that precludes further use. Compost and yard waste are prohibited materials. Goellner stated that staff is recommending that drop-off facilities be a conditional use in the Light Industrial zoning district and a permitted use in the Industrial zoning district and that recycling facilities be a conditional use in both the Light Industrial and Industrial zoning districts. She added that staff is also recommending that outdoor storage for both uses be prohibited, and that the distance requirements from other zoning districts remain the same as they are currently. Waldhauser suggested that drop-off facility be changed to recycling drop-off facility. Waldhauser stated that the Industrial zoning district has specific requirements regarding screening, and asked if they have the ability to impose screening requirements in the Light Industrial zoning district as well. Zimmerman stated that the Light Industrial zoning district has requirements regarding screening from the Single Family Residential zoning district and the R-2 Residential zoning district. Goellner added the Conditional Use Permit section of the City Code also talks about visual screening. Johnson asked about the costs incurred to companies that have to go through the Conditional Use Permit process. Goellner stated that applicants would have to pay to prepare their plans, for a survey of their property, and a $400 application fee. Kluchka added that many of the issues reviewed during the Conditional Use Permit process can be addressed in the applicant's narrative. Cera noted that Staff also surveyed other cities and he doesn't think their fees would be much different than Golden Valley's. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission December 8, 2014 Page 7 MOVED by Baker, seconded by Waldhauser and motion carried unanimously to recommend approval of the Zoning Code Text Amendments to Sections 11.03 Definitions, 11.35 Light Industrial Zoning District, and 11.36 Industrial Zoning District regarding recycling facilities. Cera stated that there are other housekeeping items being addressed along with the recycling language. Baker stated that the public hearing was not opened. Kluchka apologized and noted that no one was present to comment. --Sho Recess-- Reports on Meetings of the Ho ing and Redevelopment Authority, City Council, Board of Zoning App Is and other Meetings Baker ve a report on the Bottineau S ation Area Planning Committee meeting he attended d stated that the group is p nning to hold a neighborhood meeting on January 7 to ddress some of the conms about the Golden Valley Road statio Kluchka said would like the Planni Commission to receive a summary n update sometim in February. Blum a ded that it would be nice to see eline of the proposal to help b er understand th process. Baker stated that t parking analysis will be discussed at a next Council/ anager meeting. Kluchka gave a report o he Comm ity Center Task f e presentation being presented at the next Cou 'I/Mans r meeting. He ted that they are trying to convey that the work that ha een ne is more just a feasibility study, it is a long- term plan for development. 5. Other Business • 2015 BZA Liaison The Commissioners decided th h y wou like to continue having a rotating schedule for the liaison to the Board of nin Appeals. • Council Liais Report Schmidgall reminded a Commissif ners of the upc ing neighborhood listening session (Decembe 1) and the join City Council/Plan ' g Commission listening session (Decem r 15) regarding t -e subdivision morato ' m. He said he thinks it is a good idea to rt iew some of things' he City's done in the p t regarding this issue and welcomed th Planning Commissi ers involvement. 5. Adj rnment The eting was adjourned at 8:1 pm. Charles D. Segelbaum, Secretary Lisa Wittman, Administrative Assistant Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission November 10, 2014 Page 9 4. Discussion Regarding Recycling Centers Goellner reminded the Commissioners that this is a continuation of their discussion on recycling centers from their October 13, 2014, meeting. She discussed her previous recommendations and summarized the previous Planning Commission discussion. She stated that in response to the previous discussion, staff has revised the recommendations as follows: create definitions for Drop-Off Facilities and for Recycling Facilities, allow Drop-Off Facilities as a permitted use and Recycling Facilities as a conditional use in the Light Industrial zoning district, allow both Drop-Off facilities and Recycling Facilities as permitted uses in the Industrial zoning district, remove definitions for Compostable Waste and Yard Waste because they can be found in Section 10.40 of the City Code, prohibit outdoor storage, and maintain distance requirement currently in place for Recycling Centers. Baker asked about the downside to making all of the uses conditional in both zoning districts. Goellner said that could discourage some applicants' proposals. Cera said he thinks the City should limit crushing and shredding, or make Recycling Centers obtain a Conditional Use Permit, and ban crushing and shredding. Waldhauser asked about the traffic associated with these uses and suggested the City refer to the State statutes. She said she wants to focus on what these places are doing, not on what they are recycling. Baker asked about the future of Recycling Centers. Cera said there won't be any small recycling centers. Baker asked if Recycling Centers would be more localized or if they would be centralized. Cera said they would be centralized. Cera suggested requiring a Conditional Use Permit for Recycling Centers, but not for Drop-Off Centers. Johnson questioned why they are being so abstract about this, rather than saying what the City wants to see or doesn't want to see. Cera agreed that the City doesn't have to permit or define things, they just have to know what they want or don't want. Waldhauser said she is concerned about allowing Drop-Off Centers in the Light Industrial zoning district. Cera stated that there are Drop-Off locations everywhere. Segelbaum suggested the language apply only if a Drop-Off center is the primary use. Baker said he wants to support composting and asked where that is expected to occur. Goellner said that is an outdoor use. Goellner asked the Commissioners if they want to require a Conditional Use Permit for Recycling Centers in the Light Industrial zoning district. The Commissioners agreed. --Short Recess-- Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission October 13, 2014 Page 3 Findings: 1. Both of the lots of the pr osed subdivision meet the requirements of the R-1 Single Family Zoning District. 2. ity Engineer finds at the lots are builad 3. The ad of the new is will not pl an undue strain on City utility systems. Conditions: 1. The City Attorney wi er if a title review is necessary prior to approval of the Final Plat. 2. A park de ion fee of 3,080 shall be 'd before Final Plat approval. 3. The ' ngineer's me orandum, dated Oc r 7, 2014, shall become part of this oval. II applicable City permi shall be obtained prior to the elopment of the new lots. 3. Discussion Regarding Recycling Centers Goellner explained that a moratorium was adopted by the City Council on July 1, 2014, to prohibit the establishment of any new recycling centers for six months to allow staff time to research the possible need to update both the definition of Recycling Centers in the Zoning Code, and the reconsideration of the appropriateness of Recycling Centers as permitted uses within the Light Industrial and Industrial zoning districts. Goellner discussed staff's recommendations including: creating two definitions, one for major recycling facilities and one for minor recycling facilities, removing metal shredding and car crushing from the current definition, adding definitions for compostable waste and yard waste, requiring a Conditional Use Permit for minor recycling facilities in the Light Industrial zoning district, allowing minor recycling facilities as a permitted use and major recycling facilities as a conditional use in the Industrial zoning district, and prohibiting outdoor storage. She added that staff is also recommending that the existing distance requirements for recycling centers remain. Kluchka asked about noise issues considered in staff's research. Goellner stated that truck traffic, and the picking up and dropping off of materials, among others were considered. Kluchka asked what "indoors" means and if the City would allow recycling in a covered space or with windows open, both of which may cause noise issues. Segelbaum questioned if collection, sorting, and disposing should also be restricted along with outdoor storage. He questioned if the proposed ordinance captures what these facilities do. Cera questioned what is trying to be accomplished. Cera said he has dealt with recycling in his job for many years. He discussed various types of recycling facilities, scrap metal facilities, drop-off facilities and hazardous waste facilities. He stated that Golden Valley does not need a drop-off facility because of how the recycling is picked up. He said that Golden Valley also doesn't want to have a hazardous waste facility or a typical recycling facility. He stated that permits may need to Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission October 13, 2014 Page 4 be obtained and that any ordinance the City adopts should be consistent with the state statutes. Kluchka asked about the size of a typical recycling facility. Cera said they are usually in a warehouse. Segelbaum questioned if it would make sense to refer to the state requirements regarding the definitions. Cera suggested not having major and minor categories and just calling them recycling centers. Kluchka suggested offering specific language in the conditional use and permitted sections in the ordinance. Cera agreed that would make it simpler. He suggested eliminating the language pertaining to household hazardous waste, car crushing and appliances. Segelbaum said he would like to have the major and minor levels in the Light Industrial and Industrial zoning districts, but he is not sure how to distinguish between the two. Kluchka suggested issues such as size, hours and truck access areas be considered. Cera stated that volume and quantity should also be addressed. He reiterated that he is in favor of one facility that could go in the Light Industrial zoning district and the Industrial zoning district. Segelbaum said he is concerned about inconsistencies. Waldhauser said she likes the idea of having major and minor categories because there is already a logical relationship with the Light Industrial and Industrial zoning districts. Cera said the City is going to want to look forward on this issue because the whole system is evolving. He added that he thinks the language should be kept to collection, storage, transferring, and sorting because the City won't want to have incinerators or chemical plants. Johnson said he thinks consistency is important and said the terms should be better defined so there isn't a danger of excluding something. He added that the Commission should decide what they want, or don't want, to see happen. Blum said he is concerned about the words "short-term storage" because they are ambiguous. Cera suggested short-term storage be defined as 90 days or less. Blum suggested that the word in the title not be used in the definition. He also questioned if"garden waste" and "yard waste" are duplicative and asked about recycling dirt. Segelbaum questioned if yard waste was being excluded. Cera suggested the ordinance use the words "as defined in state statute." Segelbaum asked if staff did research on pollution. Goellner said no, and added that some cities define recycling centers based on the volume of recycling, and the number of trucks per day at a facility. Kluchka questioned if any type of recycling should be allowed in the Light Industrial zoning district. Waldhauser said it makes sense to allow consumer household items like Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission October 13, 2014 Page 5 electronics or small appliances in the Light Industrial zoning district. Cera suggested allowing collection and disassembly in the Light Industrial zoning district and more processing types of uses in the Industrial zoning district. Segelbaum said excluding yard waste makes sense. Cera suggested excluding household hazardous as well. Goellner suggested listing conditions in the ordinance regarding traffic volume and material volume. Zimmerman said staff would work on revising the proposed ordinance and bring it back to the Planning Commission for further review. --Sho Recess-- Reports on Meetings of the Hou ng and Redevelopment Authority, City Council, Board of Zoning Appea and other Meetings Kluchk eported on the most recent Co munity Center Task Force meeting. He stated that the a nda was more about costs a d not the final designs. Waldhauser ve an update on the last ottineau Station Area Planning Committee meeting. She s ted that it was their fir opportunity to respond to specific detai out the stations and at could happen at ach station. 5. Other Busine • Council Liaiso eport Council Member Schmidgall ve an update on recently adopted subdivision moratorium. He stated that Cou it is ` oing d' uss, at their next regular meeting, including proposals that are alrea i tithe view process. Kluchka questioned if the Council has been educated at all on research done by the Planning Commission in the last five years. Zimmerman sai will be one component of the moratorium review, along with reviewing exi g `o s and listening sessions. Cera asked if the Council i going to 'e disc sing organized hauling. Schmidgall said yes, he believes that it will be dis ssed at a November Council/Manager meeting. 6. Adjournm t The meetin as adjourned at 8:44 m. Charles D. Segelbaum, Secretary Lisa Wittman, Administrative Assistant c iol of C MEMORANDUM valley Planning Department 763-593-8095/763-593-8109(fax) Date: December 8, 2014 To: Planning Commission From: Emily Goellner, Associate Planner/Grant Writer Subject: Zoning Code Text Amendments— Recycling Centers Background Staff has revised recommendations to the Zoning Code regarding Recycling Centers in response to the discussions with Planning Commission on October 13 and November 10, 2014. The discussions were prompted by the adoption of a six-month moratorium prohibiting the establishment of any new recycling centers. In response to these discussions, staff has revised the recommendations. Summary of Updated Staff Recommendations: • Create two definitions: Drop-Off Facility and Recycling Facility • In the Light Industrial District, allow Drop-Off Facilities and Recycling Facilities as conditional uses. • In the Industrial District, allow Drop-Off Facilities as permitted use and Recycling Facilities as a conditional use. • Prior to Planning Commission review, staff shall request that Conditional Use Permit (CUP) applicants provide information addressing traffic, noise, visual appearance, vermin, odor, dust, and other factors included in the basis for CUP approval. • Prohibit outdoor storage • Maintain distance requirements currently in place for Recycling Centers Proposed Definitions: While Commissioners liked the possibility of separating the definitions into two sub-categories, there was concern that basing the distinction on materials was not ideal. Rather, the definitions could be differentiated by the activities allowed of the each type of facility. Commissioners also advised that the definitions of Recycling Facilities in the Golden Valley Zoning Code be made similar to the definitions found in Minnesota State Statute. Minnesota State Statute describes a recycling facility as: "A facility at which materials are prepared for reuse in their original form or for use in manufacturing processes that do not cause the destruction of the materials in a manner that precludes further use." Proposed Definitions Drop-Off Facility Recycling Facility A facility used for the collection, sorting, A facility used to prepare non-hazardous storage, and transfer of non-hazardous material for reuse in their original form or for materials for reuse in their original form or for use in manufacturing processes that do not use in manufacturing processes that do not cause the destruction of the materials in a cause the destruction of the materials in a manner that precludes further use. Compost manner that precludes further use. Compost and yard waste are prohibited materials. and yard waste are prohibited materials. At Recycling Facilities, the preparation of materials would likely include cleaning and compacting. It would be required that these activities are performed indoors, which would mitigate many of the negative impacts that preparation of materials could have on surrounding properties. Recommended Permissions: To inform whether to permit these uses, permit them conditionally, or not to permit them, staff referred to the intent and purpose of the Light Industrial and Industrial Zoning Districts. The purpose of the Light Industrial Zoning District is to provide for the establishment of warehousing, offices, and light industrial developments. Permitted uses include light manufacturing uses that would not constitute a nuisance or health hazard to surrounding or adjacent residential or commercial districts. The purpose of the Industrial Zoning District is to provide for the establishment of industrial and manufacturing development and uses along with directly related and complementary uses which, because of the nature of the product or character of activity, requires isolation from residential and commercial uses. Recommended Permissions Light Industrial Industrial Drop-Off Facility Conditional Permitted Recycling Facility Conditional Conditional 2 Conditional Use Permits: A Conditional Use Permits (CUP) would be required for a Recycling Facility with no outdoor storage in Light Industrial Districts and Industrial District. A CUP would also be required for a Drop-Off Facility with no outdoor storage in Light Industrial Districts. This requirement would give the Planning Commission and City Council the ability to impose conditions on the recommendation for approval in order to address any areas of concern. If an owner applies for a CUP, the Zoning Code states that the Planning Commission shall make findings and recommendations to the Council based upon any or all of the following factors (which need not be weighed equally): 1. Demonstrated need for the proposed use 2. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan of the City 3. Effect upon property values in the neighboring area 4. Effect of any anticipated traffic generation upon the current traffic flow and congestion in the area* 5. Effect of any increases in population and density upon surrounding land uses 6. Increase in noise levels to be caused by the proposed use* 7. Any odors, dust, smoke, gas, or vibration to be caused by the proposed use* 8. Any increase in flies, rats, or other animals or vermin in the area to be caused by the proposed use* 9. Visual appearance of any proposed structure or use* 10. Any other effect upon the general public health, safety, and welfare of the City and its residents* *Factors most associated with Recycling Facilities *The CUP application includes a section in which the applicant must indicate their understanding that prior to the final approval of the Conditional Use Permit, they may be required to supply additional information, studies, or plans to address any of the ten factors listed above. Prohibit Outdoor Storage: Staff finds that prohibiting outdoor storage for Drop-Off Facilities and Recycling Facilities will mitigate many of the negative effects these facilities can have. In order to include this in the zoning code, staff finds it consistent with the format of the zoning code to include "no outdoor storage" as a specific description of the permitted or conditional use. For example: Proposed Ordinance Language in Light Industrial District Section 11.35 Subdivision 4. Conditional Uses The following conditional uses may be allowed after review by the Planning Commission and approval by the Council following the standards and procedures set forth in this Chapter: G. Recycling Facilities with no outdoor storage Maintain Current Distance Requirements The Council expressed concern that some types of high intensity recycling facilities may be allowed to locate in areas of close proximity to residential uses. Occasionally, there are limits placed in other zoning codes on the location of recycling facilities in relation to residential properties. The 3 current regulations in the Light Industrial and Industrial districts apply to all permitted and conditional uses in those districts, not Recycling Centers specifically. The current distance requirements are as follows: Current Distance Regulations in Industrial and Light Industrial Districts: 75 feet facing R-1, R-2 100 feet adjoining R-1, R-2 50 feet adjoining R-3, R-4, BPO, Institutional Staff sees these distance requirements to be adequate if outdoor storage is prohibited and conditional use permits are required. These requirements eliminate the need to increase distance requirements. Attachments Planning Commission Minutes, dated November 10, 2014 (1 page) Planning Commission Minutes, dated October 13, 2014 (3 pages) Memo to Planning Commission, dated November 10, 2015 (4 pages) Memo to Planning Commission, dated October 13, 2014 (4 pages) City Code Section 11.03: Definitions, with underlined-overstruck language (2 pages) City Code Section 11.35: Light Industrial Zoning District, with underlined-overstruck language (10 pages) City Code Section 11.36: Industrial Zoning District, with underlined-overstruck language (8 pages) Zoning Map (1 page) 4 AEMORANDUM vallevi Planning Department v. 763-593-8095/763-593-8109(fax) Date: November 10, 2014 To: Planning Commission From: Emily Goellner, Associate Planner/Grant Writer Subject: Discussion of Zoning Code Text Amendments—Recycling Centers Background Staff has revised recommendations to the Zoning Code regarding Recycling Centers in response to the discussion with Planning Commission on October 13, 2014. The first discussion was prompted by the adoption of a six-month moratorium prohibiting the establishment of any new recycling centers. Summary of Previous Staff Recommendations: • Create two definitions: Major Recycling Facility and Minor Recycling Facility • Metal shredding and car crushing are removed from definitions • Add Compostable Waste and Yard Waste as definitions in the zoning code • In the Light Industrial District, allow Minor Recycling Facilities as a conditional use • In the Industrial District, allow Minor Recycling Facilities as a permitted use and Major Recycling Facilities as a conditional use • Prohibit outdoor storage • Maintain distance requirements currently in place for Recycling Centers Summary of Previous Discussion on October 13: • Be consistent with the activities currently permitted in each district • There should be a difference in permitted uses between Light Industrial and Industrial Districts; should consider prohibiting recycling in Light Industrial District • Do not include household hazardous waste, light bulbs, motor oil, and batteries in the definitions unless extra permits will be required by the City of Golden Valley • Definitions should be modeled after relevant state statute definitions, which are broad • Creating two definitions for Recycling Centers is generally supported, but preferred that the difference between them be focused on activities than materials Summary of Previous Discussion on October 13: • Collection and storage are least intense uses, followed by sorting and transfer • Reconstituting, chemical processing, and incineration should not be allowed • Yard and compostable waste may not need to be defined if they are in state statute In response to this discussion, staff has revised the recommendations. Summary of Revised Staff Recommendations: • Create two definitions: Drop-Off Facility and Recycling Facility • In the Light Industrial District, allow Drop-Off Facilities as a permitted use and allow Recycling Facilities as a conditional use • In the Industrial District, allow Drop-Off Facilities and Recycling Facilities as permitted uses • Do not add Compostable Waste and Yard Waste as definitions to Zoning Chapter because they can be found in Section 10.40 of City Code if needed for reference • Prohibit outdoor storage • Maintain distance requirements currently in place for Recycling Centers Proposed Definitions: While Commissioners liked the possibility of separating the definitions into two sub-categories, there was concern that basing the distinction on materials was not ideal. Rather, the definitions could be differentiated by the activities allowed of the each type of facility. Commissioners also advised that the definitions of Recycling Facilities in the Golden Valley Zoning Code be made similar to the definitions found in Minnesota State Statute. Minnesota State Statute describes a recycling facility as: "A facility at which materials are prepared for reuse in their original form or for use in manufacturing processes that do not cause the destruction of the materials in a manner that precludes further use." Proposed Definitions Drop-Off Facility Recycling Facility A facility used for the collection, sorting, A facility used to prepare non-hazardous storage, and transfer of non-hazardous material for reuse in their original form or for materials for reuse in their original form or for use in manufacturing processes that do not use in manufacturing processes that do not cause the destruction of the materials in a cause the destruction of the materials in a manner that precludes further use. Compost manner that precludes further use. Compost and yard waste are prohibited materials. and yard waste are prohibited materials. At Recycling Facilities, the preparation of materials would likely include cleaning and compacting. It would be required that these activities are performed indoors, which would mitigate many of the negative impacts that preparation of materials could have on surrounding properties. Recommended Permissions: To inform whether to permit these uses, permit them conditionally, or not to permit them, staff referred to the intent and purpose of the Light Industrial and Industrial Zoning Districts. The purpose of the Light Industrial Zoning District is to provide for the establishment of warehousing, offices, and light industrial developments. Permitted uses include light manufacturing uses that would not constitute a nuisance or health hazard to surrounding or adjacent residential or commercial districts. The purpose of the Industrial Zoning District is to provide for the establishment of industrial and manufacturing development and uses along with directly related and complementary uses which, because of the nature of the product or character of activity, requires isolation from residential and commercial uses. Recommended Permissions Light Industrial Industrial Drop-Off Facility Permitted Permitted Recycling Facility Conditional Permitted Therefore, a Conditional Use Permits (CUP) would be required for a Recycling Facility with no outdoor storage in Light Industrial Districts. This would give the Planning Commission and City Council the ability to impose conditions on the recommendation for approval in order to address any areas of concern. If an owner applies for a CUP, the Zoning Code states that the Planning Commission shall make findings and recommendations to the Council based upon any or all of the following factors (which need not be weighed equally): 1. Demonstrated need for the proposed use 2. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan of the City 3. Effect upon property values in the neighboring area 4. Effect of any anticipated traffic generation upon the current traffic flow and congestion in the area* 5. Effect of any increases in population and density upon surrounding land uses 6. Increase in noise levels to be caused by the proposed use* 7. Any odors, dust, smoke, gas, or vibration to be caused by the proposed use* 8. Any increase in flies, rats, or other animals or vermin in the area to be caused by the proposed use* 9. Visual appearance of any proposed structure or use* 10. Any other effect upon the general public health, safety, and welfare of the City and its residents* *Factors most associated with Recycling Facilities Attachments Unapproved Planning Commission Minutes, dated October 13, 2014 (3 pages) City Code Section 11.03: Definitions, with underlined-overstruck language (2 pages) City Code Section 11.35: Light Industrial Zoning District, with underlined-overstruck language (10 pages) City Code Section 11.36: Industrial Zoning District, with underlined-overstruck language (8 pages) Existing City Code Section 10.40: Collection and Disposal of Garbage, Refuse, Yard Waste, and Recyclables (6 pages) Memo to Planning Commission, dated October 13, 2014 (4 pages) Zoning Map (1 page) F4'-..g. .. ��A•� 15+R �t' 3 8 � .jDi 4' X d tX s �,'. � ;� �h v , vane", Planning Department 17 763-593-8095/763-593-8109(fax) Date: October 13, 2014 To: Planning Commission From: Emily Goellner, Associate Planner/Grant Writer Subject: Discussion of Zoning Code Text Amendments— Recycling Centers Background At the City Council meeting on July 1, 2014, a moratorium was adopted to prohibit the establishment of any new recycling centers in the City for six months. Staff has examined various zoning concerns that were generated by the interest expressed in scrap metal recycling at the former SIFCO site at 2430 Winnetka Avenue North. The City Council has directed Staff to bring to the attention of the Planning Commission the possible need to update both the definition of Recycling Centers in the zoning code and the reconsideration of the appropriateness of Recycling Centers as permitted uses within the Light Industrial and Industrial zoning districts. Recommendation Staff investigated the definitions and requirements of Recycling Centers in several other cities. From this research and further discussion, staff has generated several recommendations as to how Golden Valley can rewrite their zoning ordinance to mitigate the negative effects of recycling centers such as truck traffic, noise, odors, and air pollution, if they so choose. Summary of Recommendations • Create two definitions: Major Recycling Facility and Minor Recycling Facility • Metal shredding and car crushing are removed from definition • Add Compostable Waste and Yard Waste as definitions in the zoning code • In the Light Industrial District, allow Minor Recycling Facilities as a conditional use • In the Industrial District, allow Minor Recycling Facilities as a permitted use and Major Recycling Facilities as a conditional use • Prohibit outdoor storage • Maintain distance requirements currently in place for Recycling Centers Definitions Recycling Centers are defined in Section 11.03, Subd. 79, as "Any area or structure, whether privately or publicly owned and operated, that engages in recycling or reclamation of metals, paper, or other materials including crushing, shredding, baling or compacting materials such as auto bodies, scrap metal, etc." The City Council expressed concern that the crushing of auto bodies and other similar activities were too intense. Also, "etc." should be removed from the definition. Many cities separate the definition of Recycling Centers into at least two sub-categories—often defined as "low" vs. "high" intensity or "minor' vs. "major' facilities. "High" or "major" recycling facilities are often targeted for materials from commercial or industrial uses. "Low" or "minor' recycling facilities are often targeted for materials from household or consumer uses. The distinction between recycling facilities can also be made by distinguishing the capacity of the operation in terms of average truck loads to and from the site, pounds of material processed, size of the lot, or size of the facility. Staff suggests separating the definition into two categories based on the materials to be recycled, which indicates the intensity of the impacts on surrounding properties. This allows the ability to add more detail to each definition and provide more flexibility in the Industrial and Light Industrial zoning districts, which is explained in the next section on permitted and conditional uses. Proposed Definitions _ _Minor Recycling Facility Major Recycling Facility A facility used for the collection, treating, A facility used for the collection, treating, cleansing, short-term storage, and cleansing, short-term storage, and reconstituting of recyclable household and/or reconstituting of recyclable commercial and/or consumer waste including paper, cardboard, industrial waste including paper, cardboard, glass, plastic, aluminum, batteries, fluorescent glass, aluminum, brass, stainless steel, lead, light bulbs, and motor oil. It does not include copper, plastic, batteries, fluorescent light construction and demolition debris, metals for bulbs, household appliances, and motor oil. It commercial and industrial uses, yard waste, does not include the processing of yard waste, household appliances, or compostable waste automobiles, or other compostable waste except for clean paper products except clean paper products Materials recycled at a Major Recycling Facility are often larger, denser, and therefore undergo a more intense recycling process. The loading and unloading of materials require heavier equipment and trucks for transport. This increased intensity is distinct from that of the Minor Facility. Metal shredding and car crushing are activities included in the current definition; however, they are not listed in the proposed definition of a Major Recycling Facility or a Minor Recycling Facility. Some zoning codes also separately distinguish the recycling of"green" materials such as yard waste and compostable waste. These materials are not currently defined in the zoning code, but are listed in the proposed definitions of Major and Minor Recycling Facilities. This could be a good opportunity to include compostable waste in the list of definitions since many plastics are now compostable and composting is becoming a more popular activity in both households and industries. It is not recommended that compostable materials and yard waste be eligible materials for processing in Minor Recycling Facilities or Major Recycling Facilities at this time. Proposed Definitions Compostable Waste A biodegradable waste that is derived from plants and animals including food waste, kitchen waste, paper waste, compostable plastic, and yard waste Yard waste Organic waste including leaves, grass, brush, small logs and branches, garden waste, straw, dirt, and sod Permitted and Conditional Uses Recycling Centers are listed as permitted uses, "including the recycling of metals and other materials" without any additional quantitative or qualitative requirements or restrictions. Staff recommends that Minor Recycling Facilities (with no outdoor storage) be allowed as a conditional use in the Light Industrial District and a permitted use (with no outdoor storage) in the Industrial District. It is also recommended that Major Recycling Facilities (with no outdoor storage) be allowed as a conditional use in the Industrial District only. This allows the staff, Planning Commission, and City Council a chance to review proposals and create conditions for approval that mitigate the negative effects that Recycling Facilities can have on the surrounding area. Staff finds that prohibiting outdoor storage for Minor and Major Recycling Facilities will mitigate many of the negative effects these facilities can have. In order to include this in the zoning code, staff finds it consistent with the format of the zoning code to include "no outdoor storage" as a specific description of the permitted or conditional use. For example: Proposed Ordinance Language in Light Industrial District Section 11.35 Subdivision 4. Conditional Uses The following conditional uses may be allowed after review by the Planning Commission and approval by the Council following the standards and procedures set forth in this Chapter: G. Minor Recycling Facilities with no outdoor storage Proposed Ordinance Language in Industrial District Section 11.36 Subdivision 3. Permitted Uses The following uses and no others shall be considered permitted uses within the Industrial Zoning District: G. Minor Recycling Facilities with no outdoor storage Proposed Ordinance Language in Industrial District Section 11.36 Subdivision 4. Conditional Uses The following conditional uses may be allowed after review by the Planning Commission and approval by the Council following the standards and procedures set forth in this Chapter: G. Major Recycling Facilities with no outdoor storage Therefore, Conditional Use Permits would be required for: • Minor Recycling Facilities with no outdoor storage in Light Industrial Districts • Major Recycling Facilities with no outdoor storage in Industrial Districts Distance Requirements The Council expressed concern that some types of high intensity recycling facilities may be allowed to locate in areas of close proximity to residential uses. Occasionally, there are limits placed in other zoning codes on the location of recycling facilities in relation to residential properties. The current regulations in the Light Industrial and Industrial districts apply to all permitted and conditional uses in those districts, not Recycling Centers specifically. The current distance requirements include: Current Regulations in Light Industrial (11.35) and Industrial (11.36) Zoning Districts: In the case of premises facing a Residential Zoning District or an R-2 Zoning District across a public street, the yard abutting that street shall not be less than 75 feet from the right-of-way line of the street to the structure. In the case of premises adjoining a Residential Zoning District or an R-2 Zoning District required side and rear yard setbacks shall be not less than 100 feet in depth. In the case of premises adjoining a Multiple Dwelling, Business and Professional Office, or Institutional Zoning District, required side and rear yard setbacks shall be not less than 50 feet in depth. Staff investigated the potential to use the current language in the code as state above, but increase the distances as follows: Current Distance Regulation Potential Distance Regulation 75 feet facing R-1, R-2 150 feet facing R-1, R-2 100 feet adjoining R-1, R-2 200 feet adjoining R-1, R-2 50 feet adjoining R-3, R-4, BPO, Institutional 100 feet adjoining R-3, R-4, BPO, Institutional With a brief mapping analysis, staff found that these increased distances would not be too limiting. However, prohibiting outdoor storage may eliminate the need to increase distance requirements. Attachments Proposed Zoning Code Language (21 pages) Zoning Map (1 page) §11.03 79. , etheF materials including eFushing, shredding, baling eF cempacting . . Recycling Drop-Off Facilites A facility used for the collection, sorting, storage, and transfer of non-hazardous and non-organic materials for reuse in their original form or for use in manufacturing processes that do not cause the destruction of the materials in a manner that precludes further use. 80. Recycling Facility: A facility used to prepare non-hazardous and non-organic materials for reuse in their original form or for use in manufacturing processes that do not cause the destruction of the materials in a manner that precludes further use. Residential Facility: Any facility licensed by the State of Minnesota (except 8-0-- for foster family homes) public or private, which for gain or otherwise, provides 81, one (1) or more persons twenty-four (24) hour per day care including food, lodging, training, education, supervision, habilitation, rehabilitation and treatment they need. Residential facilities include but are not limited to State institutions under the control of the Commissioner of Public Welfare, residential treatment centers, maternity shelters, group homes, halfway houses, residential programs or schools for handicapped children. 84-. Restaurant, Class I: Any traditional type restaurant where food is served to a 82. customer and consumed while seated at a counter or table, including cafeterias where food is selected by a customer while going through a service line and taken to a table for consumption 8-2-. Restaurant, Class II: Fast-food type restaurants where customers order and 83. are served at a counter and take it to a table or counter, or off the premises where the food is consumed. A "Class II" restaurant also includes "drive-in" restaurants where some or all customers consume their food in an automobile regardless of how it is served, and further includes carry-out and delivery restaurants where food is prepared for consumption off the premises only. 83. Restaurant, Class III: Any type of night club, tavern, restaurant or other facility providing entertainment, food and/or beverage that provides sit-down service but may also provide standup bar service and standup tables within the premises. * Subsequent Subsections renumbered as needed. § 11.35 Section 11.35: Light Industrial Zoning District Subdivision 1. Purpose The purpose of the Light Industrial Zoning District is to provide for the establishment of warehousing, offices and light industrial developments. Subdivision 2. District Established Properties shall be established within the Light Industrial Zoning District in the manner provided for in Section 11.90, Subdivision 3 of this Chapter, and when thus established shall be incorporated in this Section 11.35, Subdivision 2 by an ordinance which makes cross-reference to this Section 11.35 and which shall become a part hereof and of Section 11.10, Subdivision 2 thereof, as fully as if set forth herein. In addition the Light Industrial Zoning Districts thus established, and/or any subsequent changes to the same which shall be made and established in a similar manner, shall be reflected in the official zoning map of the City as provided in Section 11.11 of this Chapter. Subdivision 3. Permitted Uses The following uses and no others shall be considered permitted uses within the Light Industrial Zoning District: A. Offices B. Warehouses C. Wholesale-Retail distribution centers D. Electronics manufacturing E. Food packaging and processing; provided, however, that no processing shall involve any cooking, heating, smoking, soaking or marinating procedures Source: Ordinance No. 546 Effective Date: 9-I8-81 F. Assembly and/or fabricating exclusive of sheet metal or steel fabricating, foundries and similar uses except for the fabricating of sheet metal as it is used for the heating, ventilation and air conditioning business (which types of sheet metal fabricating shall be permitted uses Source: Ordinance No. 674 Effective Date: 12-27-85 G. Reeyeling centers, Golden Valley City Code Page 1 of 10 § 11.35 #.G Other light manufacturing uses that would not constitute a nuisance or health hazard to surrounding or adjacent residential or commercial districts Source: Ordinance No. 546 Effective Date: 9-18-81 1.H Essential Services - Class I and Class III Source: Ordinance No. 271, 2nd Series Effective Date: 11-15-02 3.I Temporary Retail Sales in accordance with this Section Source: Ordinance No. 536, 2nd Series Effective Date: 1-29-15 +E.J Sexually Oriented Businesses Source; Ordinance No. 326, 2nd Series Effective Date: 4-15-05 Subdivision 4. Conditional Uses The following uses may be allowed as Conditional Uses after review by the Planning Commission and approval by the Council following the standards and procedures set forth in this Chapter: A. Building materials yard (including inside and outside storage) B. Public garages for repairing and storing motor vehicles C. Laundries and dry-cleaning plants D. Animal hospital where domestic animals are received for treatment, care and cure by a duly licensed veterinary physician and surgeon in the customary and ordinary pursuit of his profession E. Ball fields and other recreation facilities F. Research and development laboratories and pilot plant operations incidental thereto G. Greenhouses with no outside storage, including an outside growing area no larger than the greenhouse building area. Retail sales may be permitted only where located inside and incidental to a wholesale business. Golden Valley City code § 11.35 1. In the case of premises adjoining a Residential Zoning District or an R-2 District required side and rear yard setbacks shall be not less than one hundred (100) feet in depth. 2. In the case of premises adjoining a Multiple Dwelling, Business and Professional Office, or Institutional Zoning Districts, required side and rear yard setbacks shall not be less than fifty (50) feet in depth. Source: Ordinance No. 546 Effective Date: 9-18-81 3. In the case of premises adjoining a Commercial, Light Industrial, or Industrial, Zoning District, required side and rear yard setbacks shall be not be less than twenty (20) feet in depth. Source: Ordinance No. 271, 2nd Series Effective Date: I1-15-02 4. One-half (0.5) of the required side and rear yards, as measured from the lot line, shall be landscaped, planted, and maintained as a buffer zone. Source: Ordinance No, 546 Effective Date: 9-18-81 *Subdivision 7. Use Qualifications A. Landscaping. All open areas of any site, lot, tract or parcel shall be so graded so as to provide proper drainage, and except for areas used for parking, drives, or storage, shall be landscaped with trees, shrubs, or planted ground cover. Such landscaping shall conform with a landscape plan that conforms to City standards and is approved by the City Manager or his/her designee. Source: Ordinance No. 427, 2nd Series Effective Date: 12-25-09 B. Storage. All raw materials, supplies, finished or semi-finished products and equipment shall be stored within a completely enclosed building, or within the confines of a one hundred percent (100%) opaque wall or fence not less than six (6) feet in height. C. Screening. All principal, accessory, and conditional uses, except business signs, which are situated within fifty (50) feet of a Residential Zoning District or an R-2 Zoning District shall be screened and buffered from such Zoning District by a separation of open space which shall have a minimum depth of thirty (30) feet, and shall include a required fence or vegetative screening of not less than ninety percent (90%) opacity, and not less than six (6) feet in height above the level of the said Residential or R-2 Zoning District, Source: Ordinance No. 546 Golden Valley City Code Page 5 of 10 § 11.36 K. Temporary Retail Sales in accordance with Subdivisien 11 e this Section. Source: Ordinance No. 79, 2nd Series Effective Date: 10-10-91 L. Sexually Oriented Businesses. Source: Ordinance No. 326, 2nd Series Effective Date: 4-15-05 M. Recycling Drop-Off Facilities, Subdivision 4. Conditional Uses The following conditional uses may be allowed after review by the Planning Commission and approval by the Council following the standards and procedures set forth in this Chapter: A. All conditional uses as provided for in the Light Industrial Zoning District B. Car wash C. Structures and premises for automobile, or other motor vehicle sales and showrooms, with incidental accessory service and repair facilities D. Gasoline service stations E. Bulk storage of gas, fuel oil, chemicals, and other liquid or solid materials which may be considered hazardous or toxic F. Mortuaries G. Off-street parking lots for adjacent Commercial or Industrial uses H. Outdoor sales including motor vehicle and equipment rental I. Drive-in retail establishments, such as banks, cleaners, photo shops, restaurants (Class II), and similar uses J. Unattended business operations, such as vending machines and equipment K. Temporary structures such as tents or air-supported structures L. Railroad yards, railroad tracks and rights-of-way in such yards, railroad shops, round houses, and any other use which shall be for railroads M. Automobile repair shops, auto body repair and/or painting, and auto cleaning and reconditioning Source: Ordinance No. 641 Effective Date: 11-16-84 Golden Valley City Code Page 2 of 8 § 11.36 Source: Ordinance No. 551 Effective Date: 9-11-81 3. In the case of premises adjoining a Commercial, Light Industrial, or Industrial, , side and rear yard setbacks shall be not be less than twenty (20) feet in depth. Source: Ordinance No. 271, 2nd Series Effective Date: 11-15-02 4. All required front yard setbacks shall be landscaped, and one-half (1/2) of the required side and rear yard setbacks shall be landscaped. Source: Ordinance No. 551 Effective Date: 9-11-81 *Subdivision 7. Landscaping and Screening A. All required yards shall be landscaped according to a landscape plan that conforms to City standards and is approved by the City Manager or his/her designee. Source: Ordinance No. 427, 2nd Series Effective Date: 12-25-09 B. A solid screen, consisting of either a solid fence or wall not less than six (6) feet in height, or a planted landscape screen providing at least ninety percent (90%) opacity and at least six (6) feet in height at the time of planting, shall be installed and maintained along all property lines separating an Industrial Zoning District from any Residential, Multiple Dwelling, or Institutional Zoning District. C. All waste material, debris, refuse, junk or damaged vehicles shall be either kept entirely within an enclosed building, or completely screened from public streets and adjacent property. D. In the Industrial Zoning District, no materials or equipment shall be stored outside, unless screened in such a manner as not to be visible from adjacent properties or streets. No storage shall be permitted within the required landscaped area. Source: Ordinance No. 551 Effective Date: 9-11-81 *Subdivision 8. Lot Coverage No building or structure, or group thereof, shall occupy more than fifty percent (50%) of the total land area of any lot or parcel in an Industrial Zoning District. Source: Ordinance No. 609 Effective Date: 11-11-83 Golden Valley City Code Page 4 of 8 ORDINANCE NO. 536, 2ND SERIES AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE Amending Section 11.03 Definitions, 11.35 Light Industrial Zoning District, and 11.36 Industrial Zoning District Regarding Recycling Centers The City Council for the City of Golden Valley hereby ordains as follows: Section 1. City Code Section 11.03 Definitions, #79: Recycling Center is hereby deleted and a new Definition #79: Recycling Drop-Off Facility is added to read as follows: Recycling Drop-Off Facility: A facility used for the collection, sorting, storage, and transfer of non-hazardous and non-organic materials for reuse in their original form or for use in manufacturing processes that do not cause the destruction of the materials in a manner that precludes further use. Section 2. City Code Section 11.03 a new Definitions, #80: Recycling Facility is added to read as follows and the remaining definitions renumbered accordingly: Recycling Facility: A facility used to prepare non-hazardous and non-organic materials for reuse in their original form or for use in manufacturing processes that do not cause the destruction of the materials in a manner that precludes further use. Section 3. City Code Section 11.35, Subdivision 3(G) is deleted and the remaining Subdivisions re-lettered accordingly. Section 4. City Code Section 11.35, Subdivision 3(I) is amended to read as follows: Temporary Retail Sales in accordance with this Section. Section 5. City Code Section 11.35, Subdivision 4 is amended by adding the following Conditional Uses: U. Recycling Drop-Off Facilities V. Recycling Facilities Section 6. City Code Section 11.35, Subdivision 6(C)(3) is amended to read as follows: 3. In the case of premises adjoining a Commercial, Light Industrial, or Industrial Zoning District, required side and rear yard setbacks shall not be less than twenty (20) feet in depth. Section 7. City Code Section 11.36, Subdivision 3 is amended by adding the following Permitted Use: M. Recycling Drop-Off Facilities. Section 8. City Code Section 11.36, Subdivision 6(C)(3) is amended to read as follows: 3. In the case of premises adjoining a Commercial, Light Industrial, or Industrial Zoning District, required side and rear yard setbacks shall not be less than twenty (20) feet in depth. Section 9. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99 entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 10. This Ordinance shall take effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law. Adopted by the City Council this 6th day of January, 2015. /s/Shepard M. Harris Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: /s/Kristine A. Luedke Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk on ale= W z Pam 0 do 02 Zoning Districts 0 t 1 Creek Single Family(R-1) U Official Zoning Map Moderate Density(R-2)Residential Medium Density(R-3)Residential CITY OF NEW HOPE CITY OF NEW HOPE CITY OF CRYSTAL Cisromr—a -4)Residential High Density (R A CITY OF ROBBINSDALE -n "N' 1-394 Mixed Use a - 2 rn Subdistrict A L-Rise up to 3 stories % ',e-_'3043 t Subdistrict B 0 0 MidRi.-upto6shaies 5=5 13 z z Subdistrict C High Rise-up tolOstones O (Y 36 Commercial 0 Light Industrial u 9 Industrial a. u Business&Professional Offices For. CZ,_.-of aK p­.d-—.1 Institutional er 11­.City tiull iona(ml (I-1)Sub-District(0—h..,schools etc) • 83n. 3 (1-2)Sub-District iii1bremes,museums and colleges,etc) A 0-3)Sub-District(nu rsin homes,private clubs and clinics,",Z) 74 pen, 5 a (1-4)Sub-District(goffewmes,parks,playgrounds and Theodore WwWh o offices,etc) Regional Park,- J� 9 (Mels Park 8 Rec (cemetenes,etc) Now 0-5)Sub-District C3 24 Planned Unit Development(PUD) 1-394 Overlay Zoning District(Zones A,B,C) 4 '-u Flood Plain Management Zoning Overlay District 1 S' Sea Me*OM.i.1 Flood Zone profile and M.p'.n fis With the City-The collection of flood Profiles 96 contoured in the Flood Insurance Study,Volumes I of 2 and 2 of 2,Hennepin County,Mmr.sot, :11j—dictio—dated September 2.2DO4,includim9the Flood Insurano,Rat,Map ft, City fGaWenVaky,p,n,ts27D53CO194E,27053CO213E,27053CO21 E,Z7053C0332E. Z7053CO351 E,Z7053C0352 E and 27063C0354 E.dated S'pt"W4 44 r Z 2004. 51 84 61 2 Shoreland Overlay District 71 See Section on Sh-1-d Management $9 33 for setback don.—ft.m protected waters 39 Pdm Data,811912014 a so—, a Hennepin Co—y S-y—offlc�f,,Pp,*U..(2013) 70 City&Gofdorr/Ifilyfl—filthe,ley- 14— Wirth Lake o 400 add 0 1.— 2.4do 3.2W Feet z z 0 o W 0 Approved Amendments: Official Zoning Map A it & Ci COUncil Ordinance Number Comments -7- s /l '4, 46 u 8 0,-t the Planning Department at Cry,Hall for a list of amendments approved since adoption. p 0 ell on 00 0 u w ' i j '' ORDINANCE NO.271,2ND SERIES -A This is to certify that this is the Official Zoning Map referred to in Section 11.11 A z of the Zoning Chapter of the City Code of the City of Golden Valley. Ado-s L.�' \ t � J =f /` =/ � � - � pted this 22nd day of November 2002. 0 �"'�* / / �%r j% /�, , �a r .�� fir � �. /' '•ea j __ / ,., ,���j z"" U 11 CITY OF 41 LINDA R.LOOMIS, MAYOR j A ir Westwood J11y - Ir ST.LOUIS PARK Lake CITY OF ST.LOUIS PARK Attest: DONALD GJAYLOR, CITY CLERK City of Golden valley Planning Department 1-. Wownii§ 1111 Golden valley Road ao,,f" Golden Valley MN 5542 588 • La like 763-593-8095 ­goldenvalley—gon, valleygrol It- ["I fil, 'E""' M, 0 R A NDUM City Administration/Council 763-593-3991 /763-593-8109(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting January 6, 2015 Agenda Item 6. A. Reset Meeting Dates Prepared By Judy Nally, Administrative Assistant Summary Each year the City Council reviews the calendar and resets meeting dates if there are any conflicts. Listed below are the meeting dates that need to be reset: City Council Meeting: August 4 - Night to Unite September 15 - Rosh Hashanah November 3 - General Election Recommended Action Motion to reset the following City Council meeting dates: August 4 to Wednesday, August 5 September 15 to Wednesday, September 16 November 3 to Wednesday, November 4 CI golden valleY Administrative Services Department 763-593-8013/763-593-3969(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting January 6, 2015 Agenda Item 6. C. First Consideration - Ordinance #537 - Amending Chapter 5: Alcoholic Beverages Licensing and Regulations with additions of an Off-Sale Small Brewer License, On-Sale Taproom License and Brewpub Off-Sale Malt Liquor License Prepared By Kris Luedke, City Clerk Summary Staff is recommending changes to the City Code regarding alcoholic beverage licensing to allow for small breweries and taprooms. The recommended changes to Chapter 5: Alcoholic Beverage Licensing and Regulation, include the addition of new Sections 5.33: Off-Sale Small Brewer License, 5.34: On-Sale Brewer Taproom License, 5:35: Brewpub Off-Sale Malt Liquor License and amendments to Sections 5:01 Definitions, and 5:41 Sunday Sales. If the Council adopts the Ordinance on First Consideration, Second Consideration will be at the January 20, 2015, meeting. Upon approval after two considerations, the new license types will be added to Chapter 5 of the City Code. The Planning Commission approved changes to the Zoning Code to allow such uses at the December 22, 2014, meeting. Council will consider the Zoning Code amendments at the January 20, 2015, Council meeting. Attachments • City Code Section 5.01: Definitions, with underline-overstrike language (1 page) • City Code Sections 5.33: Off-Sale Small Brewer Liquor License, 5.34: On-Sale Small Brewer Taproom License, 5.35: Brewpub Off-Sale Malt Liquor License and 5.41: Sunday Sales with underline-overstrike language (2 pages) • Ordinance#537, Amending Chapter 5: Alcoholic Beverages Licensing and Regulations with additions of an Off-Sale Small Brewer License, On-Sale Taproom License and Brewpub Off-Sale Malt Liquor License (3 pages) Recommended Action Motion to adopt Ordinance # 537, Amending Chapter 5: Alcoholic Beverages with the addition of an Off-Sale Small Brewer License, On-Sale Brewer Taproom and Brewpub Off-Sale Malt Liquor License upon first consideration. § 5.01 Chapter5 ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES LICENSING AND REGULATION Section 5.01: Definitions As used in this Chapter, unless otherwise stated in specific sections, the following words and terms shall have the meanings stated: Source: City Code Effective Date: 6-30-88 1. Alcoholic Beverage: means any beverage containing more than one-half of one percent alcohol by volume. Source: Ordinance No. 121, 2nd Series Effective Date: 12-15-94 2. Applicant: means any person making an application for a license under this Chapter. 3. Application: means a form with blanks or spaces thereon, to be filled in and completed by the applicant as the applicant's request for a license, furnished by the City and uniformly required as a prerequisite to the consideration of the issuance of a license for a business. Source: City Code Effective Date: 6-30-88 4. Beer: means "malt liquor" as defined herein. Source: Ordinance No. 55, 2nd Series Effective Date: 1-17-91 5. Brewer: means a person who manufactures beer for sale. 6. Brewpub: A Class III Restaurant establishment, as defined in City Code, that is also licensed by the City to brew malt liquor, such as beer or ale, on site for sale and consumption on the premises, or for sale in sealed containers for consumption off the premises. Source: Ordinance No. 537, 2nd Series Effective Date: 1-29-15 76.Club: means an incorporated organization organized under the laws of the State for civic, fraternal, social, or business purposes, for intellectual improvement, or for the promotion of sports, or a congressionally chartered * Subsequent Subsections renumbered as needed. Golden Valley City Code § 5.33, 5.34, 5.35 and 5.41 Section 5.33: Off-Sale Small Brewer Liquor License Subdivision 1. Off-Sale Small Brewer Liquor License A brewer licensed by the Commissioner of Public Safety to brew up to 3,500 barrels of malt liquor per year may with the approval of the Commissioner of Public Safety be issued a license by the City for off-sale of malt liquor subject to the following conditions: A. The malt liquor sold off-sale must be produced and packaged on the licensed premises. B. Off-sale of malt liquor shall be limited to the legal hours of off-sale and the malt liquor sold off-sale must be removed from the premises before off-sale closing time at exclusive liquor store. C. The malt liquor sold off-sale shall be packaged in 64-ounce containers commonly known as "growlers" or in 750 milliliter bottles and shall have the following requirements for packaging: 1. The containers or bottles shall bear a twist type closure, cork, stopper or alp-q, 2. At the time of sale, a paper or plastic adhesive band, strip or sleeve shall be applied to the container or bottle and extend over the top of the twist type closure, cork, stopper or plug forming a seal that must be broken upon opening of the container or bottle. 3. The adhesive band, strip or sleeve shall bear the name and address of the brewer/licensee selling the malt liquor. 4. The container or bottles shall be identified as malt liquor, contain the name of the malt liquor, bear the name and address of the brewer/licensee selling the malt liquor, and the contents in the container packaged as required herein shall be considered intoxicating liquor unless the alcohol content is labeled as otherwise in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Rules, part 7515.1100. Section 5.34 On-Sale Small Brewer Taproom License Subdivision 1. On-Sale Small Brewer Taproom Liquor License A brewer licensed by the Commissioner of Public Safety to brew up to 3,500 barrels of malt liquor per year may issued a license by the city for on-sale of malt liquor subject to the following conditions: A. The malt liquor sold on sale for consumption must be produced by the brewer on the licensed premises. B. No other beverages containing alcohol may be sold or consumed on the licensed premises. C. The hours of operation shall be limited to the hours set forth in Minnesota Statute 340A.501 subd. 2. § 5.33, 5.34, 5.35 and 5.41 Section 5.35: Brewpub Off-Sale Malt Liquor License Subdivision 1. Brewpub Off-Sale Malt Liquor License A brew pub off-sale malt liquor license may be issued, with approval of the Commissioner of Public Safety, to brewer who holds an on-sale intoxicating or 3.2 percent malt liquor license issued by the city for a restaurant operated in the place of manufacture, subject to the following conditions: A. The malt liquor sold off-sale must be produced and packaged on the licensed premises. B. Off-sale of malt liquor shall be limited to the legal hours of off-sale and the malt liquor sold off-sale must be removed from the premises before the applicable off-sale closing time at exclusive liquor stores. C. The malt liquor sold off-sale shall be packaged in 64-ounce containers commonly known as "growlers" or in 750 milliliter bottles and shall have the following requirements for packaging_ 1. The containers or bottles shall bear a twist type closure, cork, stopper or Ip u g_ 2. At the time of sale, a paper or plastic adhesive band, strip or sleeve shall be applied to the container or bottle and extend over the top of the twist type closure, cork, stopper or plug forming a seal that must be broken upon opening of the container or bottle. 3. The adhesive band, strip or sleeve shall bear the name and address of the brewer/licensee selling the malt liquor. 4. The container or bottles shall be identified as malt liquor, contain the name of the malt liquor, bear the name and address of the brewer/licensee selling the malt liquor, and the contents in the container packaged as required herein shall be considered intoxicating liquor unless the alcohol content is labeled as otherwise in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Rules, part 7515.1100. Section 5.41: Sunday Sales Subdivision 1 Sunday Sales The electorate of the City having heretofore authorized the same at a general or special election, a special license authorizing sales on Sunday may be issued to hotels, restaurants, clubs or bowling centers, in conjunction with the sale of food, which have on-sale intoxicating liquor licenses and which also have seating capacity for not less than thirty (30) guests at one time. Prior to issuance of such license, the applicant shall provide the City with proof of financial responsibility for Sunday sales. A special license authorizing sales on Sunday may also be issued to a license holder of an On-Sale Brewer Taproom license for the operation of a taproom on Sundays. ORDINANCE NO. 537, 2ND SERIES AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE Adding New Sections 5.33: Off-Sale Small Brewer Liquor License, 5.34: On-Sale Small Brewer Taproom License and 535: Brewpub Off-Sale Malt Liquor License and Amending Sections 5.01: Definitions and 5:41 Sunday Sales The City Council for the City of Golden Valley hereby ordains: Section 1. City Code Section 5.01: Definitions is hereby amended to add a new definition #6: Brewpub to read as follows with subsequent subsections renumbered as needed. 6. Brewpub: A Class III Restaurant establishment, as defined in City Code, that is also licensed by the City to brew malt liquor, such as beer or ale, on site for sale and consumption on the premises, or for sale in sealed containers for consumption off the premises. Section 2. City Code Chapter 5 is hereby amended to add the following new section 5.33: Section 5.33: Off-Sale Small Brewer Liquor License Subdivision 1. Off-Sale Small Brewer Liquor License A brewer licensed by the Commissioner of Public Safety to brew up to 3,500 barrels of malt liquor per year may with the approval of the Commissioner of Public Safety be issued a license by the City for off-sale of malt liquor subject to the following conditions: A. The malt liquor sold off-sale must be produced and packaged on the licensed premises. B. Off-sale of malt liquor shall be limited to the legal hours of off-sale and the malt liquor sold off-sale must be removed from the premises before off-sale closing time at exclusive liquor store. C. The malt liquor sold off-sale shall be packaged in 64-ounce containers commonly known as "growlers" or in 750 milliliter bottles and shall have the following requirements for packaging: 1. The containers or bottles shall bear a twist type closure, cork, stopper or plug. 2. At the time of sale, a paper or plastic adhesive band, strip or sleeve shall be applied to the container or bottle and extend over the top of the twist type closure, cork, stopper or plug forming a seal that must be broken upon opening of the container or bottle. 3. The adhesive band, strip or sleeve shall bear the name and address of the brewer/licensee selling the malt liquor. 4. The container or bottles shall be identified as malt liquor, contain the name of the malt liquor, bear the name and address of the brewer/licensee selling the malt liquor, and the contents in the container packaged as required herein shall be considered intoxicating liquor unless the alcohol content is labeled as otherwise in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Rules, part 7515.1100. Section 3. City Code Chapter 5 is hereby amended to add the following new section 5.34: Section 5.34 On-Sale Small Brewer Taproom License Subdivision 1. On-Sale Small Brewer Taproom Liquor License A brewer licensed by the Commissioner of Public Safety to brew up to 3,500 barrels of malt liquor per year may be issued a license by the city for on-sale of malt liquor subject to the following conditions: A. The malt liquor sold on sale for consumption must be produced by the brewer on the licensed premises. B. No other beverages containing alcohol may be sold or consumed on the licensed premises. C. The hours of operation shall be limited to the hours set forth in Minnesota Statute 340A.501 subd. 2. Section 4. City Code Chapter 5 is hereby amended to add the following new section 5.35: Section 5.35: Brewpub Off-Sale Malt Liquor License Subdivision 1. Brewpub Off-Sale Malt Liquor License A brew pub off-sale malt liquor license may be issued, with approval of the Commissioner of Public Safety, to brewer who holds an on-sale intoxicating or 3.2 percent malt liquor license issued by the city for a restaurant operated in the place of manufacture, subject to the following conditions: A. The malt liquor sold off-sale must be produced and packaged on the licensed premises. B. Off-sale of malt liquor shall be limited to the legal hours of off-sale and the malt liquor sold off-sale must be removed from the premises before the applicable off-sale closing time at exclusive liquor stores. C. The malt liquor sold off-sale shall be packaged in 64-ounce containers commonly known as "growlers" or in 750 milliliter bottles and shall have the following requirements for packaging: 1. The containers or bottles shall bear a twist type closure, cork, stopper or plug. 2. At the time of sale, a paper or plastic adhesive band, strip or sleeve shall be applied to the container or bottle and extend over the top of the twist type closure, cork, stopper or plug forming a seal that must be broken upon opening of the container or bottle. 3. The adhesive band, strip or sleeve shall bear the name and address of the brewer/licensee selling the malt liquor. 4. The container or bottles shall be identified as malt liquor, contain the name of the malt liquor, bear the name and address of the brewer/licensee selling the malt_liquor, and the contents in the container packaged as required herein shall be considered intoxicating liquor unless the alcohol content is labeled as otherwise in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Rules, part 7515.1100. Section 5. City Code section 5.41 is hereby amended by changing Section 5.41 to read as follows: Section 5.41 : Sunday Sales Subdivision 1. Sunday Sales The electorate of the City having heretofore authorized the same at a general or special election, a special license authorizing sales on Sunday may be issued to hotels, restaurants, clubs or bowling centers, in conjunction with the sale of food, which have on- sale intoxicating liquor licenses and which also have seating capacity for not less than thirty (30) guests at one time. Prior to issuance of such license, the applicant shall provide the City with proof of financial responsibility for Sunday sales. A special license authorizing sales on Sunday may also be issued to a license holder of an On-Sale Brewer Taproom license for the operation of a taproom on Sundays. Section 6. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Sec. 5.99 entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 7. This Ordinance shall take effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law. Adopted by the City Council this 6th of January, 2015. /s/Shepard M. Harris Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: /s/Kristine A. Luedke Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk MEMORANDUM alley Administrative Services Department 763-593-8013/763-593-3969(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting January 6, 2015 Agenda Item 6. D. First Consideration - Ordinance#538 -Amending the 2015 Master Fee Schedule for New Liquor License Fees Prepared By Kris Luedke, City Clerk Sue Virnig, Finance Director Summary If Council proceeds with adoption of amending Chapter 5: Alcoholic Beverages Licensing to included the addition of an Off-Sale Small Brewer license, On-Sale Brewer Taproom License and Brewpub Off-Sale Malt Liquor License, Council should also adopt the associated fees. Staff researched other metro cities' license fees and is recommending the following: On-Sale Brewer Taproom license - $600 Off-Sale Small Brewer liquor license - $200 Brewpub Off-Sale Malt Liquor License - $200 If Council adopts the ordinance on First Consideration, Second Consideration will be at the January 20, 2015, meeting. Once published, the fee will be effective and with an annual renewal in July of each year. Each license will be considered for approval at future council meetings. Attachments • Ordinance #536, Amending the 2015 Master Fee Schedule to include New Liquor License Fees Recommended Action Motion to adopt Ordinance #536, Amending the 2015 Master Fee Schedule to include New Liquor License Fees associated with the new Liquor license types upon first consideration. ORDINANCE NO. , 2ND SERIES AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE Amending the 2015 Master Fee Schedule for New Liquor License Fees The City Council for the City of Golden Valley hereby ordains: Section 1. The 2015 Master Fee Schedule in Chapter 25 of the City Code is hereby amended by adding the following new liquor license fees: Liquor License License Renewal Date Annual Fee Off-Sale Small Brewer Liquor License 1-Jul $200 On-Sale Brewer Taproom License 1-Jul $600 Brewpub Off-Sale Malt Liquor License 1-Jul $200 Section 2. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" is hereby adopted in its entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law. Adopted by the City Council this 6th day of January, 2015. /s/Shepard M. Harris Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: /s/Kristine A. Luedke Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk