11-15-16 CC Agenda Packet (entire)AGENDA
Regular Meeting of the
City Council
Golden Valley City Hall
7800 Golden Valley Road
Council Chamber
November 15, 2016
6:30 pm
1.CALL TO ORDER PAGES
A.Pledge of Allegiance
B.Roll Call
2.ADDITIONS AND CORRECTIONS TO AGENDA
3.CONSENT AGENDA
Approval of Consent Agenda - All items listed under this heading are considered to be
routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no
discussion of these items unless a Council Member so requests in which event the item
will be removed from the general order of business and considered in its normal
sequence on the agenda.
A.Approval of Minutes - City Council Meeting November 1, 2016 2-4
B.Approval of City Check Register 5
C.Licenses:
1. Gambling License Exemption and Waiver of Notice Requirement - Good
Shepherd Church
6-8
2. Gambling License Exemption and Waiver of Notice Requirement - Ave Maria
Academy
9-11
D.Minutes of Boards and Commissions:
1. Board of Zoning Appeals - August 23, 2016 12-18
2. Environmental Commission - August 22, 2016 19
3. Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission - August 18, 2016 20-25
E.Bids and Quotes:
1.Award Contract for 2017-2018 Trimming and Removal of Trees on Public
Property, Project No.17-03
26
F.Authorize Agreement with Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. for preparation of the 2040
Comprehensive Waste Water Plan
27-31
4.PUBLIC HEARINGS
5.OLD BUSINESS
6.NEW BUSINESS
A.First Consideration -Ordinance #615 -Amendment to Chapter 3: Public Utilities of
Golden Valley City Code Regarding the Addition of a Sewer Access Charge and
Water Access Charge Ordinance
32-41
B.First Consideration - Ordinance #616 - Establishing a 2017 Master Fee Schedule 42-59
C.Announcement of Meetings
1. Future Draft Agendas: City Council December 1, 2016, Council/Manager and
December 13, 2016 and City Council December 20, 2016
60-62
D.Mayor and Council Communications
7.ADJOURNMENT
UNOFFICIAL MINUTES
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
GOLDEN VALLEY, MINNESOTA
November 1, 2016
1. CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Harris called the meeting to order at 6:30 pm.
1A. Pledge of Allegiance
1B. Roll Call
Present: Mayor Shep Harris, Council Members Joanie Clausen, Larry Fonnest, Andy Snope
and Steve Schmidgall. Also present were: City Manager Cruikshank, City Attorney Garry and
City Clerk Luedke.
2. ADDITIONS AND CORRECTIONS TO AGENDA
MOTION made by Council Member Clausen, seconded by Council Member Snope to approve
the agenda of November 1, 2016, as submitted and the motion carried.
3. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA
MOTION made by Council Member Snope, seconded by Council Member Clausen to approve
the consent agenda of November 1, 2016, as submitted and the motion carried.
3A.Approve Minutes of the City Council Meeting of October 18, 2016.
3B. Approve City Check Register and authorize the payment of the bills as submitted.
3C. Accept for filing the Minutes of Boards and Commissions as follows:
1. Planning Commission - October 10, 2016
2. Human Rights Commission - September 27, 2016
3. Environmental Commission - July 25, 2016
4. Human Services Fund - July 11, 2016
3D.Adopt Resolution 16-69, Waiving the Public Hearing Pursuant to Minnesota Statute
429.031 and Ordering Certification of Special Assessments on Private Sanitary Sewer
Repairs City Wide in 2016.
3E.Adopt Resolution 16-70, Waiving the Public Hearing Pursuant to Minnesota Statute
429.031 and Ordering Certification of Special Assessments on Private Sanitary Sewer
Repairs that involve 2016 Street Improvements.
3F.Receive and file the September 2016 Financial Reports.
3G.Adopt Resolution 16-71,Amending the 2016 General Fund Budget.
3H.Adopt Resolution 16-72,Authorizing Transfer of $800,000 from the Brookview
Community Center Building Fund to Brookview Debt Service Fund of $452,610 and
$347,390 to the Building Improvement Fund.
3I.Authorize entering into an agreement for professional engineering services with SEH,
Inc. for the design of City Improvement Project 16-22, 10
th Avenue Culvert Replacement
in an amount not to exceed $181,900.
Unofficial City Council Minutes -2- November 1, 2016
6. NEW BUSINESS
6A1. 2018 Pavement Management Program - Authorize Preparation of Feasibility
Report and Professional Services Agreement with SEH, Inc.
City Engineer Oliver presented the staff report and answered questions from Council.
MOTION made by Council Member Snope, seconded by Council Member Schmidgall to adopt
Resolution 16-68, Ordering Preparation of Feasibility Report for the 2018 Pavement
Management Program upon a vote being taken the following voted in favor of: Snope,
Clausen, Harris, Fonnest and Schmidgall, the following voted against: none and the motion
carried.
MOTION made by Council Member Clausen, seconded by Council Member Snope to
authorize entering into an agreement for professional engineering services with SEH, Inc. in an
amount not to exceed $337,700 and the motion carried.
6A2. Financing of Capital Equipment; Establishing Compliance with Reimbursement
Bond Regulations under the Internal Revenue Code
MOTION made by Council Member Fonnest, seconded by Council Member Snope to adopt
Resolution 16-74, Relating to the Financing of the City’s 2018 Pavement Management
Program; Establishing Compliance with Reimbursement Bond Regulations under the Internal
Revenue Code upon a vote being taken the following voted in favor of: Harris, Snope, Clausen,
Fonnest and Schmidgall, the following voted against: none and the motion carried.
6B. Announcement of Meetings
The General Election is on November 8, 2016, at the various polling locations.
The next Council/Manager meeting will be on November 9, 2016, at 6:30 pm.
Some Council Members may attend the Historical Society Presentation “Ray Stockman, The
Father of Golden Valley Parks on November 10, 2016, at 7 pm at the Golden Valley Historical
Society.
Some Council Members may attend the METRO Blue Line Extension Open House on
November 10, 2016, from 5 to 7:30 pm in the Council Chambers.
City Offices will be closed on November 11, 2016, in observance of Veteran’s Day.
The next City Council meeting will be held on November 15, 2016, at 6:30 pm.
6C. Mayor and Council Communication
City Clerk Luedke updated Council regarding absentee voting for the upcoming General
Election on November 8, 2016.
Council Member Schmidgall updated Council regarding the Highway 169 Task Force meeting
that he attended.
Unofficial City Council Minutes -3- November 1, 2016
Physical Development Director Nevinski and City Manager Cruikshank updated Council on the
ongoing Douglas Drive construction project.
7.ADJOURNMENT
MOTION made by Council Member Snope, seconded by Council Member Clausen and the
motion carried unanimously to adjourn the meeting at 6:51 pm.
_______________________________
Shepard M. Harris, Mayor
ATTEST:
__________________________
Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk
Executive Summary For Action
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
November 15, 2016
Agenda Item
3. B. Approval of City Check Register
Prepared By
Sue Virnig, Finance Director
Summary
Approval of the check register for various vendor claims against the City of Golden Valley.
Attachments
•Document sent via email
Recommended Action
Motion to authorize the payment of the bills as submitted.
city 0
golden1j,," 7, MEMORANDUM
Cit Administration Council
�a � �
763-593-3991 /763-593-8109(fax)
Executive Summary For Action
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
November 15, 2016
Agenda Item
3. C. 1. Gambling License Exemption and Waiver of Notice Requirement - Good Shepherd Church
Prepared By
Judy Nally, Administrative Assistant
Summary
As per State Statute organizations that conduct gambling within the City limits have to submit an
application for a lawful gambling permit to the State after the permit has been approved or
denied by the City. Depending upon the timing of the permit the applicants may request the City
to waive the 30-day waiting period.
Attachments
• Application for Exempt Permit (2 pages)
Recommended Action
Motion to receive and file the gambling license exemption and approve the waiver of notice
requirement for the Good Shepherd Church.
MINNESOTA LAWFUL GAMBLING
9/16
LG220 Application for Exempt Permit Page 1 of 2
An exempt permit may be issued to a nonprofit Application Fee (non-refundable)
organization that: Applications are processed in the order received. If the application
• conducts lawful gambling on five or fewer days, and is postmarked or received 30 days or more before the event, the
• awards less than $50,000 in prizes during a calendar application fee is#100; otherwise the fee is 150.
year. $
If total raffle prize value for the calendar year will be Due to the high volume of exempt applications, payment of
$1,500 or less, contact the Licensing Specialist assigned to additional fees prior to 30 days before your event will not expedite
your county by calling 651-539-1900. service, nor are telephone requests for expedited service accepted.
ORGANIZATION INFORMATION
Organization//�� L 4
Previous Gambling 1. —7�
Name: CGdJ �S' e/d C Permit Number: X� / DQ
Minnesota Tax ID Federal Employer ID f
Number, if any: Number(FEIN), if any: V/ D,9 Z/O , z�
Mailing
Address: Q1,4s
City: l/ L LIA State: Zip: ��Count : / w
Name of Chief Executive Officer (CEO): uL I.l
Daytime Phone: 7/6 Email pyFFv
NONPROFIT STATUS
Type of Nonprofit Organization (check one):
= Fraternal ® Religious Veterans Other Nonprofit Organization
Attach a copy of one of the following showing proof of nonprofit status:
(DO NOT attach a sales tax exempt status or federal employer ID number, as they are not proof of nonprofit status.)
KNI
A current calendar year Certificate of Good Standing
11110mi Don't have a copy? Obtain this certificate from:
MN Secretary of State, Business Services Division Secretary of State website, phone numbers:
60 Empire Drive, Suite 100 www.sos.state.mn.us
St. Paul, MN 55103 651-296-2803, or toll free 1-877-551-6767
IRS income tax exemption (S01(c)) letter in your organization's name
Don't have a copy? To obtain a copy of your federal income tax exempt letter, have an organization officer contact the
IRS toll free at 1-877-829-5500.
F] IRS -Affiliate of national,statewide,or international parent nonprofit organization (charter)
If your organization falls under a parent organization, attach copies of both of the following:
1. IRS letter showing your parent organization is a nonprofit 501(c) organization with a group ruling, and
2. the charter or letter from your parent organization recognizing your organization as a subordinate.
GAMBLING PREMISES INFORMATION
Name of premises where the gambling event will be conducted
(for raffles, list the site where the drawing will take place): f7 .112-1
Address (do not use P.O. box): S~
City or
TownshiwZip: County: .,
Date(s)of activity (for raffles, .�
indicate the date of the drawing): -el elf ZS 2_o17
Check each type of gambling activity that your organization onduct:
F1Bingo ❑Paddlewheels ❑Pull-Tabs ❑Tipboards
nRaffle (total value of raffle prizes awarded for the calendar year: $ )
Gambling equipment for bingo paper, bingo boards, raffle boards, paddlewheels, pull-tabs, and tipboards must be obtained
from a distributor licensed by the Minnesota Gambling Control Board. EXCEPTION: Bingo hard cards and bingo ball selection
devices may be borrowed from another organization authorized to conduct bingo. To find a licensed distributor, go to
www.mn.gov/gcb and click on Distributors under List of Licensees, or call 651-539-1900.
9/16
LG220 Application for Exempt Permit Page 2 of 2
LOCAL UNIT OF GOVERNMENT ACKNOWLEDGMENT (required before submitting application to
the Minnesota Gambling_Control Board)
CITY APPROVAL COUNTY APPROVAL
for a gambling premises for a gambling premises
located within city limits located in a township
The application is acknowledged with no waiting period. The application is acknowledged with no waiting period.
The application is acknowledged with a 30-day waiting The application is acknowledged with a 30-day waiting
period, and allows the Board to issue a permit after 30 days period, and allows the Board to issue a permit after
(60 days for a 1st class city). 30 days.
The application is deniyie�dd.L, +//1l//) The application is denied.
Print City Name: 11191, Lit L/GL LG Print County Name:
Sic of C' y er nn I Signature of County Personnel:
Title: fflvmhDate: [v /(✓ Title: Date:
TOWNSHIP (if required by the county)
On behalf of the township, I acknowledge that the organization
is applying for exempted gambling activity within the township
The city or county must sign before limits. (A township has no statutory authority to approve or
submitting application to the deny an application, per Minn. Statutes, section 349.213.)
Gambling Control Board. Print Township Name:
Signature of Township Officer:
Title: Date:
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S SIGNATURE (required)
The information provided in this application is complete and accurate to th of my knowledge. I acknowledge that the financial
report will be completed and returned to i hin 30 days of th ven ate.
Chief Executive Officer's Signature Dater Da' �i,&,
e ', ignature designee may not sign)
Print Name:
REQUIREMENTS MAIL APPLICATION AND ATTACHMENTS
Complete a separate application for: Mail application with:
• all gambling conducted on two or more consecutive days,or a copy of your proof of nonprofit status, and
• all gambling conducted on one day.
application fee (non-refundable). If the application is
Only one application is required if one or more raffle drawings are postmarked or received 30 days or more before the event,
conducted on the same day. the application fee is $100; otherwise the fee is$150.
Financial report to be completed within 30 days after the Make check payable to State of Minnesota.
gambling activity is done: To: Minnesota Gambling Control Board
A financial report form will be mailed with your permit. Complete 1711 West County Road B, Suite 300 South
and return the financial report form to the Gambling Control
Board. Roseville, MN 55113
Questions?
Your organization must keep all exempt records and reports for Call the Licensing Section of the Gambling Control Board at
3-1/2 years (Minn. Statutes, section 349.166, subd. 2(f)). 651-539-1900.
Data privacy notice: The information requested application. Your organization's name and ment of Public Safety;Attorney General;
on this form(and any attachments)will be used address will be public information when received Commissioners of Administration, Minnesota
by the Gambling Control Board(Board)to by the Board. All other information provided will Management&Budget,and Revenue; Legislative
determine your organization's qualifications to be private data about your organization until the Auditor,national and international gambling
be involved in lawful gambling activities in Board issues the permit. When the Board issues regulatory agencies; anyone pursuant to court
Minnesota. Your organization has the right to the permit,all information provided will become order;other individuals and agencies specifically
refuse to supply the information; however, if public. If the Board does not issue a permit,all authorized by state or federal law to have access
your organization refuses to supply this information provided remains private,with the to the information; individuals and agencies for
information,the Board may not be able to exception of your organization's name and which law or legal order authorizes a new use or
determine your organization's qualifications and, address which will remain public. Private data sharing of information after this notice was
as a consequence, may refuse to issue a permit. about your organization are available to Board given;and anyone with your written consent.
If your organization supplies the information members, Board staff whose work requires
requested,the Board will be able to process the access to the information; Minnesota's Depart-
This form will be made available in alternative format (i.e. large print, braille) upon request.
An Equal Opportunity Employer
city 0
golden!iV.. O" MEMORANDUM
11ZXXT 1Y Cit Administration Council
763-593-3991 /763-593-8109(fax)
Executive Summary For Action
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
November 15, 2016
Agenda Item
3. C. 2. Gambling License Exemption and Waiver of Notice Requirement- Ave Maria Academy
Prepared By
Judy Nally, Administrative Assistant
Summary
As per State Statute organizations that conduct gambling within the City limits have to submit an
application for a lawful gambling permit to the State after the permit has been approved or
denied by the City. Depending upon the timing of the permit the applicants may request the City
to waive the 30-day waiting period.
Attachments
• Application for Exempt Permit (2 pages)
Recommended Action
Motion to receive and file the gambling license exemption and approve the waiver of notice
requirement for the Ave Maria Academy.
f
MINNESOTA LAWFUL GAMBLING
LG220 Application for Exempt Permit Page 19/16
9of 2
An exempt permit may be issued to a nonprofit Application Fee (non-refundable)
organization that:
• conducts lawful gambling on five or fewer days, and Applications are processed in the order received. If the application
awards less than $50,000 in prizes during a calendar is postmarked or received 30 days or more before the event, the
year. application fee is $100; otherwise the fee is $150.
If total raffle prize value for the calendar year will be Due to the high volume of exempt applications, payment of
$1,500 or less, contact the Licensing Specialist assigned to additional fees prior to 30 days before your event will not expedite
your county by calling 651-539-1900, service, nor are telephone requests for expedited service accepted.
ORGANIZATION INFORMATION
Organization Previous Gambling
Name: Ave Maria Academy Permit Number: X-35338-16-008
Minnesota Tax ID Federal Employer ID
Number, if any: 2162846-000 Number(FEIN), if any: 41-1871572
Mailing
Address: 7000 Jewel Ln N
City: Maple Grove State: MN Zip: 55311
County: Hennepin
Name of Chief Executive Officer (CEO): Katie Danielson
Daytime Phone: 763.494.5388 Email: k.danielson@AveMariaAcademy.org
NONPROFIT STATUS
Type of Nonprofit Organization (check one):
a Fraternal 0 Religious Veterans
Other Nonprofit Organization
Attach a copy of one of the following showing proof of nonprofit status:
(DO NOT attach a sales tax exempt status or federal employer ID number, as they are not proof of nonprofit status.)
A current calendar year Certificate of Good Standing
Don't have a copy? Obtain this certificate from:
MN Secretary of State, Business Services Division Secretary of State website, phone numbers:
60 Empire Drive, Suite 100 www.sos.state.mn us
St. Paul, MN 55103 651-296-2803, or toll free 1-877-551-6767
IRS income tax exemption (501(c)) letter in your organization's name
Don't have a copy? To obtain a copy of your federal income tax exempt letter, have an organization officer contact the
IRS toll free at 1-877-829-5500.
❑ IRS-Affiliate of national, statewide, or international parent nonprofit organization (charter)
If your organization falls under a parent organization, attach copies of both of the following:
1. IRS letter showing your parent organization is a nonprofit 501(c) organization with a group ruling, and
2. the charter or letter from your parent organization recognizing your organization as a subordinate.
rName
BLING PREMISES INFORMATION
of premises where the gambling event will be conducted
affles, list the site where the drawing will take place): __ Metropolitan Ballroom & Clubroom
Address (do not use P.O. box): 5418 Wayzata Blvd
City or
Township: _Golden Valley Zi 55416
P� County: Hennepin
Date(s) of activity (for raffles,
indicate the date of the drawing): 3/11/2017
Check each type of gambling activity that your organization will conduct:
Bingo ❑Paddlewheels 7 Pull-Tabs 7Tipboards
MRaffle (total value of raffle prizes awarded for the calendar year: $ 10,000.00 )
Gambling equipment for bingo paper, bingo boards, raffle boards, paddlewheels, pull-tabs, and tipboards must be obtained
from a distributor licensed by the Minnesota Gambling Control Board. EXCEPTION: Bingo hard cards and bingo ball selection
devices may be borrowed from another organization authorized to conduct bingo. To find a licensed distributor, go to
www.mn.gov/gcb and click on Distributors under List of Licensees, or call 651-539-1900.
LG220 Application for Exempt Permit 9/16
Page 2 of 2
LOCAL UNIT OF GOVERNMENT ACKNOWLEDGMENT(required before submitting application to
the Minnesota Gambling Control Board)
CITY APPROVAL COUNTY APPROVAL
for a gambling premises for a gambling premises
located within city limits located in a township
The application is acknowledged with no waiting period. The application is acknowledged with no waiting period.
The application is acknowledged with a 30-day waiting The application is acknowledged with a 30-day waiting
period, and allows the Board to issue a permit after 30 days period, and allows the Board to issue a permit after
(60 days for a 1st class city). 30 days.
The application is denied. The application is denied.
��j
Print City Name: Print County Name:
Sig tur of CioPerso Signature of County Personnel:
Title: Date: (4 Title: Date:
TOWNSHIP (if required by the county)
On behalf of the township, I acknowledge that the organization
is applying for exempted gambling activity within the township
The city or county must sign before limits. (A township has no statutory authority to approve or
submitting application to the deny an application, per Minn. Statutes, section 349.213.)
Gambling Control Board. Print Township Name:
Signature of Township Officer:
Title: Date:
CHIEF:EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S SIGNATURE.(required)
The information provided in this application is complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge. I acknowledge that the financial
report will be completed and returned t9 tV Board w' 'n 30 days of the event date.
Chief Executive Officer's Signature: Citi( Date: I r r7ZJl.�
(Signature must be CEO's signature; designee may not sign)
Print Name: ^e �1 Q ISO
REQUIREMENTS MAIL:APPLICATION AND ATTACHMENTS
Complete a separate application for: Mail application with:
• all gambling conducted on two or more consecutive days, or a copy of your proof of nonprofit status, and
• all gambling conducted on one day.
Only one application is required if one or more raffle drawings are application fee (non-refundable). If the application is
conducted on the same day. postmarked or received 30 days or more before the event,
the application fee is $100; otherwise the fee is $150.
Financial report to be completed within 30 days after the Make check payable to State of Minnesota.
gambling activity is done: To: Minnesota Gambling Control Board
A financial report form will be mailed with your permit. Complete 1711 West County Road B, Suite 300 South
and return the financial report form to the Gambling Control
Board. Roseville, MN 55113
Questions?
Your organization must keep all exempt records and reports for Call the Licensing Section of the Gambling Control Board at
3-1/2 years (Minn. Statutes, section 349.166, subd. 2(f)). 651-539-1900.
Data privacy notice: The Information requested application. Your organization's name and ment of Public Safety;Attorney General;
on this form (and any attachments)will be used address will be public Information when received Commissioners of Administration, Minnesota
by the Gambling Control Board(Board)to by the Board. All other Information provided will Management&Budget, and Revenue; Legislative
determine your organization's qualifications to be private data about your organization until the Auditor,national and international gambling
be Involved in lawful gambling activities in Board Issues the permit. When the Board Issues regulatory agencies; anyone pursuant to court
Minnesota. Your organization has the right to the permit,all Information provided will become order; other individuals and agencies specifically
refuse to supply the information; however, if public. If the Board does not Issue a permit,all authorized by state or federal law to have access
your organization refuses to supply this information provided remains private,with the to the information; individuals and agencies for
information,the Board may not be able to exception of your organization's name and which law or legal order authorizes a new use or
determine your organization's qualifications and, address which will remain public. Private data sharing of information after this notice was
as a consequence, may refuse to issue a permit. about your organization are available to Board given; and anyone with your written consent.
If your organization supplies the information members, Board staff whose work requires
requested,the Board will be able to process the access to the information; Minnesota's Depart-
This form will be made available in alternative format (i.e. large print, braille) upon request.
An Equal Opportunity Employer
Minutes of a Regular Meeting of the
Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals
August 23, 2016
A regular meeting of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals was held on Tuesday,
August 23, 2016, at City Hall, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota. Vice
Chair Maxwell called the meeting to order at 7 pm.
Those present were Members Maxwell, Nelson, Orenstein, and Planning Commission
Representatives Johnson and Kluchka. Also present were Associate Planner/Grant Writer
Emily Goellner, Planning Intern Chloe McGuire Brigl, and Administrative Assistant Lisa
Wittman. Member Perich was absent.
I. Approval of Minutes— July 26, 2016, Regular Meeting
MOVED by Nelson, seconded by Kluchka and motion carried unanimously to approve the
July 26, 2016, minutes as submitted.
II. The Petition(s) are:
1315 Angelo Drive
Mohammad Vedadi, Applicant
Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Single Family Zoning District, Subd. 11
(B) Height Limitations
• 3.5 ft. over the 25 ft. of height allowed for a total height of 28.5 ft.
Purpose: To allow for the construction of a new home.
McGuire Brigl reminded the Board that at their June 28 meeting a variance to allow a
new home with an 8 ft. x 22 ft. rooftop access room was granted. Since that meeting,
the applicant's plans have changed and he is now asking to build a 14 ft. x 22 ft. rooftop
access room. The height of the home remains the same as the original proposal at 28.5
ft.
McGuire Brigl said that the applicant's stated unique circumstances are that the rooftop
access room is not easily visible from Angelo Drive, the view from Angelo Drive would
not change as a result of a larger rooftop access room, and they need more space to
access the rooftop to maintain solar panels and remove snow.
McGuire Brig[ stated that staff is recommending denial of the requested variance
because the new proposal doubles the length of the addition, above the maximum
height allowed. Staff feels the previously approved plans were sufficient for a rooftop
access, with a bathroom, stairs, and elevator. Also, the larger addition would
significantly increase the impact to the neighboring properties.
Minutes of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals
August 23, 2016
Page 2
Maxwell asked if this proposed, larger rooftop access addition would still fit within the
building envelope. McGuire Brigl said the proposed home would still fit within the
building envelope, but the rooftop access portion is much larger and more impactful
than the original proposal. She reiterated that the original proposed size of the space is
sufficient for an elevator, stairs and bathroom without causing as much impact.
Kluchka asked about the space to the left of the rooftop access structure. Goellner
explained that that space is rooftop terrace area and where the solar collectors would
be located.
Mohammed Vedadi, Applicant, said he thought his proposed new structure would be ok
without requiring another variance. He clarified that the structure to the left of the
rooftop access is deck space and a chimney. He stated that the originally proposed 8 ft.
wide structure was just the minimal amount needed for a staircase. He said that after
he received approval of his variance in June, he decided that he wants the area to be
slightly larger than just an area to exit out onto the rooftop. He said the view from the
street won't change and the house will still fit within the building envelope. He said it
sounds like the code is going to be changed in the future to allow flat roofed houses to
be 28 ft. in height, but it would be more expensive to wait until that happens to make
the proposed changes to the rooftop access.
Orenstein asked about the use of the space and questioned if it would have windows or
if it could be used as a bedroom or additional living space. Vedadi said there will be two
sliding-glass doors, but it will not be livable space. There will be room for a sitting area
and room to exit the elevator and access the rooftop space.
Maxwell asked Vedadi if he needed all 6 additional feet or if he could build the rooftop
access space any smaller. Vedadi explained that it is a structural issue because the
wall of the rooftop access sits on a wall beneath it for support. He added that ideally, his
plan was to have a full third story. He said that if the code regarding the height of flat-
roofed homes is changed he thinks he could do that within the building envelope. He
reiterated that the proposed rooftop access won't change the view from the street and
that they just want the space to be a little more usable.
Maxwell opened the public hearing.
Nancy Skophammer, 1250 Angelo Drive, said she looks at the applicant's home from
her front door. She said that she doesn't see any reason not to allow the proposed
addition.
Vedadi added that the neighbors on both sides of his property are also in full support of
his proposal.
Seeing and hearing no one else wishing to comment, Maxwell closed the public
hearing.
Johnson asked how the height of the home would be measured if it had a pitched roof.
Goellner explained that the zoning code has different height regulations for pitched
Minutes of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals
August 23, 2016
Page 3
roofs and for flat roofs. The reason for the two different height regulations is because
previously the code didn't include the "tent-shaped" method for determining the building
envelope. She added that if this proposal was for a pitched-roof home it would still fit
within the building envelope because the height would be determined at the midpoint of
the pitched roof. She stated that the key difference in this case is that the applicant isn't
trying to minimize the amount of space that requires a variance. McGuire Brigl noted
that part of the reason for the original approval was to gain access to the rooftop, not for
the extra amount of space now being proposed.
Johnson asked if there are ADA requirements for access in the rooftop space. Goellner
said that was considered by the architect.
Orenstein said the issue is the additional space. Maxwell agreed but noted that if the
roof was pitched they could create additional space.
Kluchka noted that at last month's meeting they denied a variance request for a rooftop
access addition. Maxwell said that proposal was taller than the 28 ft. allowed even for a
pitched roof home. Johnson said this proposal is less intrusive than a pitched roof
would be.
MOVED by Kluchka, seconded by Johnson and motion carried unanimously to approve
the requested variance for 3.5 ft. over the 25 ft. of height allowed for a total height of
28.5 ft. to allow for the construction of a new home.
1250 Angelo Drive
Kevin Bostrom & Nancy Skophammer, Applicants
Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Single Family Zoning District, Subd.
11(A)(3)(b) Requirements
• 2.5 ft. off the required 12.5 ft. to a distance of 10 ft. at its closest point to the
side yard (north) property line.
Purpose: To allow for the construction of a home addition.
Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Single Family Zoning District, Subd. 11
(D) Side Wall Articulation
• Any wall longer than 32 feet in length must be articulated, with a shift of at least
2 feet in depth for at least 8 feet in length. The applicant is requesting a variance
from this regulation to build an addition 35.5 feet in length with no articulation.
McGuire Brigl referred to a site plan of the property and explained the applicant's request
to build an addition that includes garage storage, an office, a mudroom/entry, and a
powder room along the north side of the property. The setback requirement along the
north side of the property is 12.5 ft. and the applicant is requesting that the proposed
Minutes of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals
August 23, 2016
Page 4
addition be located 10 ft. at its closest point to the side yard property line, without any
articulation.
McGuire Brigl referred to photos of the inside of the existing garage and explained that the
applicant is proposing to remove a vestibule that juts into the garage. The new garage
would not increase in width, but removing the vestibule would help increase the depth of
the garage. She added that there is enough space to build a 23-foot wide garage without
variances so staff is recommending denial of the request.
Kluchka asked for clarification about the garage remaining the same width. McGuire Brigl
explained that the vestibule inside the garage will be removed, but the width of the garage
door will be the same.
Johnson asked about the current distance from the garage to the north side yard property
line. McGuire Brigl said the existing garage is 16.3 ft. away from the north property line.
Nelson added that there is approximately 4 ft. they could still use without needing a
variance.
Nancy Skophammer, Applicant, stated that when they purchased this home it was
marketed as having a two-stall garage and they didn't realize the vestibule inside the
garage affected the depth. She explained that the previous owners took some of the
interior garage space and created an entry into the kitchen. She stated that the proposed
new garage would be slightly wider inside because they are going to be removing some
existing shelves. She said they've gone through a lot of different design ideas and this
proposal will give them a nice mudroom, powder room and office. She added that the
neighbors approve of the proposed addition and she does not feel that it will decrease
anyone's value or alter anyone's perspective.
Nelson asked Skophammer what room they would enter if they just expanded the garage
and removed the vestibule. Skophammer said they would enter into a small hallway.
Nelson asked which rooms are behind the garage. Skophammer said there is a kitchen
and a living area leading out to a deck.
Orenstein asked Skophammer why the new addition can't be articulated. Skophammer
said she thinks they could work with the articulation requirements and asked what qualifies
as articulation. Maxwell explained that walls can be 32 ft. in length before they have to be
bumped in or out 2 ft. for a distance of 8 ft. Skophammer asked if a canopy of the
entrance would count as articulation. Goellner said no.
Kluchka asked Skophammer how critical the proposed workbench space and bathroom
are. Skophammer said currently the only bathroom on the main level is in the master
bedroom and the workbench area would be used for storage of garage items.
Maxwell opened the public hearing.
Mohammed Vedadi, 1315 Angelo Drive, said a narrow garage is the same issue they have
with their home. He said they all want to stay in their neighborhood and make their spaces
Minutes of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals
August 23, 2016
Page 5
better. He said he is in favor of this small variance request and noted that the property to
the north has a garage along the side property line so it would not be impactful to them.
Seeing and hearing no one else wishing to comment, Maxwell closed the public hearing.
Orenstein noted that the applicant is not asking for a three-stall garage and that the Board
has granted larger variance requests in the past so granting the request would not be
inconsistent. Nelson agreed and said she is sympathetic, but the applicant in this case
could build a wider garage without variances.
Orenstein said he would like the articulation requirement to be met. The Board agreed.
Kluchka suggested that in order to meet the articulation requirement and have a functional
space the applicant could remove the vestibule inside the garage, create a bump-out for
the mudroom addition and then remove the proposed office in the back of the proposed
addition or the workbench area in the front of the proposed addition. Maxwell suggested
asking the applicant if she would like to do that. Kluchka said the Board has to address the
application that was submitted.
Nelson said it sounds like the Board is ok with the side yard variance request but not with
the request for no articulation. Johnson said it doesn't make sense to knock down the
garage for an additional 2 or 3 feet or to build a 4-foot wide office. Maxwell said they could
remove the proposed office or workbench and they probably wouldn't need articulation.
Skophammer said she thinks they can come up with articulation ideas.
MOVED by Nelson, seconded by Kluchka and motion carried unanimously to approve a
variance for 2.5 ft. off the required 12.5 ft. to a distance of 10 ft. at its closest point to
the side yard (north) property line to allow for the construction of a home addition.
MOVED by Nelson, seconded by Johnson and motion carried unanimously to deny the
variance request to build an addition 35.5 feet in length with no articulation.
4805 Markay Ridge
Kirk & Pamela Hyatt, Applicants
Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Single Family Zoning District, Subd. 12
(A)(1) Accessory Structure Location Requirements
• Detached accessory structures shall be located completely to the rear of the
principal structure.
Purpose: To allow the recently constructed shed to remain.
Request: Waiver from Section 11.21, Single Family Zoning District, Subd. 12
(A)(4) Separation Between Structure Requirements
• 9.75 ft. off the required 10 ft. to a distance of .25 ft. between the principal
structure and the accessory structure.
Minutes of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals
August 23, 2016
Page 6
Purpose: To allow the recently constructed shed to remain.
McGuire Brigl referred to a photo of the property and stated that the applicant is
requesting variances in order to maintain a recently built, non-conforming shed. She
explained that the shed should have been built completely to the rear of the home and
that there should be 10 ft. of separation between the home and the shed.
McGuire Brigl said that the applicant's stated unique circumstances are that his corner
lot limits the rear yard area because of the two front yards, the rear yard is largely
mature gardens and trees, and he needs the shed close the driveway to store his snow
blower.
Kluchka noted that a big part of this issue is that the shed is not attached to the garage.
McGuire Brigl agreed and explained that the applicant could put frost footings under the
shed and bolt the shed to the garage and it could remain where it is, or it could be
moved to a conforming location. Maxwell noted that the Board has denied similar
requests in the past and asked the reason for the footings and bolting it to the garage.
McGuire Brigl said that is what it would take to make the shed compliant with the
building code.
Orenstein questioned why the homeowner does not want to put the shed in the
buildable area. Johnson stated that the conforming area is heavily landscaped.
Goellner added that there is a lot of conforming space the homeowner could use for the
shed location, he just built it without knowing the regulations.
Kirk Hyatt, Applicant, said they are doing significant interior remodeling to their house
and part of that project was to address their storage area. He said they have historically
stored their gardening items, etc. under a blue tarp. He stated that he thought he had
the proper permits for the shed and that he didn't willingly or knowingly try to subvert the
codes. He stated that 80 to 85% of the buildable area is not buildable because it has
gardens, lighting, or irrigation.
Maxwell asked Hyatt why he is opposed to putting in frost footing and bolting the shed
to the garage. Hyatt said it seems like a sham. Orenstein said the Board can't pass
judgement on the building code, they can only address zoning code issues.
Nelson said she thinks the request is reasonable but the issue was caused by the
landowner. She said the Board has to be consistent regarding the variances they grant
and that another person asking for the same variance might not have as nice of a shed,
so she is sympathetic, but it is beyond what the Board reviews.
Maxwell reiterated that the shed doesn't have to be moved. Hyatt asked the Board if
they would feel differently if there was discussion that says his shed does meet the
building code requirements. Maxwell suggested tabling the variance requests so that
the applicant can get clarity from the Inspections Department and maybe he won't be
forced to move the shed. The applicant agreed.
Maxwell opened the public hearing.
Minutes of the Golden Valley Board of Zoning Appeals
August 23, 2016
Page 7
Dave Hoberg, 2157 Orchard Avenue North, said he is an engineer and he questions
why frost footings would be needed because he thinks the garage is a floating slab so
putting frost footings under the shed would not work. He said this is a unique
neighborhood and he doesn't want to lose much of the character.
Seeing and hearing no one else wishing to comment, Maxwell closed the public
hearing.
MOVED by Kluchka, seconded by Orenstein and motion carried unanimously to table
this proposal to the next Board of Zoning Appeals meeting.
III. Other Business
No other business was discussed.
IV. Adjournment
The meeting was adjourned at 8:23 pm.
George Maxwell, Vice Chair Lisa Wittman, Administrative Assistant
GOLDEN VALLEY ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
Regular Meeting, Minutes
August 22, 2016
Commissioners Present: Lynn Gitelis, Dawn Hill, Tonia Galonska, Larry Johnson, Jim
Stremel, Debra Yahle and Tracy Anderson
Staff Present: Eric Eckman, Public Works Specialist and Claire Huisman, Administrative
Assistant
Also Present: Council Member Larry Fonnest
Absent: None
Call to Order
Lynn Gitelis called the meeting to order at 6:30 pm.
Approval of Regular Meeting Minutes
MOVED by Hill, SECONDED by Anderson, and the motion carried unanimously to
approve the minutes of the July 25, 2016 regular meeting.
Resilience Plan Preparation — Information and Survey Questions
Eric Eckman presented to the Commission sample posters for display boards which will be
at the Resilience table at the Comprehensive Plan kick-off meeting on September 19, 2016.
He also presented a group of 30 questions that would be on the survey presented to the
public to help gauge the community's emergency preparedness and resilience to climate
related events. Commissioners were asked to email Eric with any suggestions and/or
revisions to the material presented within the next week.
GreenStep Cities BP #29 —Action 2 —Targeted Communication Strategies
A draft of the GreenStep action item in the website format was presented for review.
Amendments to the draft will be rendered and a final document will be presented for action
at the next meeting. Also, the definitions for "vulnerable population" and for "Resilience"
will be edited for clarity and readability.
Video —Sustainability and Resilience in Dubuque, Iowa
Video was viewed at this meeting. Of particular interest was the effort to improve economic
growth and resilience by partnering with the business community. The commission briefly
discussed how we could inform and engage the business community in Golden Valley.
Staff mentioned this is something we have thought about and will be looking at as part of
the Resilience Plan.
Program/Project Updates
The complete program/project update is on file. Most of the discussion involved questions
about the new flood insurance rate maps and floodplain management code updates.
Adjourn
MOVED by Stremel, SECONDED by Galonska, and the motion carried to adjourn the
meeting at 8:30 pm.
Claire Huisman
Administrative Assistant
Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission
Minutes of Regular Meeting
August 18, 2016
Golden Valley City Hall, 8:30 a.m.
Commissioners and Staff Present:
Crystal Commissioner Guy Mueller,Vice Chair Plymouth Commissioner Ginny Black
Golden Valley Alt. Commissioner Jane McDonald Robbinsdale Alt. Commissioner Michael Scanlan
Black
Medicine Lake Commissioner Clint Carlson St. Louis Park Commissioner Jim de Lambert, Chair
Minneapolis Commissioner Michael Welch Administrator Laura Jester
Minnetonka Absent Attorney Troy Gilchrist,Kennedy& Graven
New Hope Alt.Com missioner Pat Crough Engineer Karen Chandler, Barr Engineering
Technical Advisory Committee (TAC)Members/Other Attendees Present:
Derek Asche, TAC, City of Plymouth Bob Paschke, TAC, City of New Hope
Erick Francis,TAC, City of St. Louis Park Megan Albert,TAC, City of New Hope
Liz Stout,TAC, City of Minneapolis Jeff Oliver,TAC, City of Golden Valley
Mark Ray, TAC, City of Crystal Dan Fetter, Barr Engineering
Richard McCoy, TAC, City of Robbinsdale John Hink and Steve Gebauer- Solution Blue
Tom Dietrich, TAC, City of Minnetonka Will Bohmsen,Elizabeth Flinsch, Brian Sago-Blake School
1. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL
On Thursday,August 18,2 016, at 8:33 a.m. in the Council Conference Room at Golden Valley City Hall(7800
Golden Valley Rd.),Cha it de Lambert called to order the meeting of the Bassett Creek Watershed Management
Commission(BCWMC)and asked for roll call to be taken.[ The cities of Minnetonka and Crystal were absent
from roll call].
2. CITIZEN FORUM ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS
There were no comments from audience members.
3.AGENDA
MOTION: Commissioner Black moved to approve the agenda. Alt. ComWissioner Crough seconded the motion.
Upon a vote,the motion carried 7-0. [The cities of Minnetonka and Crystal were absent from the vote.]
1
BCWMC August 18, 2016, Meeting Minutes
4. CONSENT AGENDA
MOTION: Commissioner Black moved to approve the consent agenda. Alt.Commissione r McDonald Black
seconded the motion. Upon a vote,the motion carried 7-0. [The cities of Minnetonka and Crystal were absent
from the vote.]
[The following items were approved as part of the consent agenda:the July 21,2016,Com mission Meeting
Minutes,the August 2016 Financial Report,th e payment of invoices,reimbursement to Commissioners for
registration expenses to upcoming conferences, setting of fall TAC meeting, and approval of a resolution
amending the budget for the Northwood Lake Improvement Project NL-1.]
The general and construction account balances reported in the August 2016 Financial Report are as follows:
Checking Account Balance $612,705.43
TOTAL GENERAL FUND BALANCE $612,705.43
TOTAL CASH& INVESTMENTS ON-HAND (8/10/16) $2,856,174.97
CIP Projects Levied—Budget Remaining $3,359,019.19
Closed Projects Remaining Balance ($502,844.22)
2011-2015 Anticipated Tax Levy Revenue $6,710.47
2016 Anticipated Tax Levy Revenue $601,430.96
Anticipated Closed Project Balance $105,297.21
5. BUSINESS
A. Consider Assisting with Blake School Watershed 360 Project
Administrator Jester introduced Will Bohmsen with the Blake School, Upper Campus and reported that the
school is seeking assistance from the Commission on a project that combines environmental education and
photography. Mr. Bohmsen provided an overview of the proposed project including an electronic example
online. He noted he is interested in showcasing three projects or locations within the watershed that would be
photographed with a 360°camera. He reported that users could then click on various items within the photo to
find out more about a particular topic or condition within the area. He noted the project will"tell the story"of
each of the three locations and the end product could be linked on the Commission's website and used in
other educational venues. He noted that one 6-hour field trip is likely with students to visit each of the three
locations and hear from Commission or city staff about the project or features of that location.
[Commissioner Mueller arrives.]
There were some questions from Commissioners and discussion about different locations that might be
appropriate to include and the staff time that might be involved with the project. Commissioners thought the
2
BCWMC August 18, 2016, Meeting Minutes
project was interesting and a good idea. Commissioners Black and Welch indicated they would like to be
involved. It was noted the Education Committee might be involved as well.
MOTION• Commissioner Welch moved to authorize Administrator Jester to spend up to 10 hours assisting
Blake School with the project Alternate Commissioner McDonald Black seconded the motion. Upon a vote
the motion carried 8-0. [City of Minnetonka was absent from the vote.]
B. Consider Partnership on Four Seasons Redevelopment Project
Administrator Jester provided background on this item. She reminded Commissioners that at their meeting
in September 2013,the Commission conditionally approved 90%plans for the Four Seasons Area Water
Quality Project that included restoration of a channel upstream of the mall and creation of a stormwater pond.
She noted the CIP project was never built due to residents' concerns with tree loss and that the BCWMC CIP
budget still includes over$862,000 for that project. She reported that now the Four Seasons Mall area is
slated for redevelopment and preliminary plans indicate the developer, Rock Hill Management(RHM), is able
to treat more total phosphorus than is required by BCWMC development standards. She reported that RHM
hired Solution Blue, Inc.to design innovative stormwater management features that also help create a
community amenity and gathering space and that RHM is interested in a partnership with the BCWMC to
implement these features by utilizing CIP funds previously slated for the Four Seasons Project.
John Hink with Solution Blue noted the firm is a sustainable landscape architecture firm that frequently works
through public-private partnerships to go above and beyond requirements for stormwater treatment. Mr. Hink
presented information on proposed stormwater management features and reviewed renderings, drawings, and
estimated pollutant removals for each technique. He reported that the mixed use development will be
dominated by pedestrian-friendly features,clean and modern architecture, and natural materials. Mr. Hink
reported that the proposed development can meet stormwater requirements of 13.7 pounds of total phosphorus
removed by upgrading the existing wetland and including an iron enhanced bench. He reviewed additional
stormwater management features that would remove a greater amount of phosphorus,thus helping to improve
conditions in Northwood Lake and the North Branch Bassett Creek downstream. Those features include a
linear iron enhanced sand filter along 169 that would treat water coming from north of Rockford Rd., re-
wetting of the peat that exists under the site, installing vegetated wetlands along the front of the property, and
constructing a"wetland walk" as a significant feature within a pedestrian plaza in the center of the property.
Commissioners expressed their general support of the project and a potential partnership with the developer,
although there was consensus that more information is needed to determine what level of Commission CIP
funding might be appropriate to provide. Commissioner Black noted that the City of Plymouth is also
working with the developer to incorporate park and ride features and stormwater management components
and that the city may be offering financial incentives for those features.
Commission Engineer Chandler noted that she compared the estimated pollutant removals and costs of the
current and original project(adjusted to 2016 costs)and that it appears the proposed project is approximately
75% as efficient in removing pollution per cost as the original project. She noted the Commission could
consider applying a certain percentage of the CIP funding to the project.
Derek Asche discussed the opportunity to use remaining CIP funding to construct additional stormwater
management features that could be incorporated adjacent to the site during site development and the fact that
a rate control structure is likely needed to control flows from the east into the wetland to the south of the site
which discharges into Northwood Lake.
There was also consensus that any future agreement would be between the City of Plymouth and the
Commission,with a corresponding agreement between the City and the developer. There was also consensus
that more information is needed to make an informed decision on possible funding levels.including financing
3
BCWMC August 18, 2016, Meeting Minutes
that may come from the city and further investigation on pollutant removals and possible adjacent projects.
Mr. Hink noted that it would be important to have a final decision on financing or a partnership within the
next two months. He noted that the developer is seeking at least$500,000 in funding to incorporate the
"above and beyond" stormwater management features.
MOTION• Commissioner Black moved that the Commission move forward with exploring a partnership
with Rock Hill Management through an agreement with the City of Plymouth and that Commission staff
continue to gather and assess additional information for further consideration including technical and legal
issues Commissioner Mueller seconded the motion Upon a vote the motion carried 8-0. [City of Minnetonka
was absent from the vote.]
C. Review Draft Response Action Plan for 2017 Main Stem Erosion Repair Project
Commission Engineer Chandler introduced Dan Fetter with Barr Engineering to review the draft Response
Action Plan(RAP). Mr. Fetter noted that the document is nearly final and that it had been reviewed by the
Commission Administrator and City of Minneapolis staff. He noted the final RAP is due to the Minnesota
Pollution Control Agency by September 1 in order to apply for the Hennepin County granted being
considered in the next agenda item. Commissioner Welch asked that the RAP include correct contamination
notes for the banks along and across from the Fruen Mill.
MOTION• Commissioner Welch moved to approve the Response Action Plan with comments from the
Commission and directed staff to submit the Plan to appropriate review agencies. Commissioner Black
seconded the motion Upon a vote the motion carried 8-0 rCily of Minnetonka was absent from the vote.]
D. Consider Applying for Hennepin County Environmental Response Fund Grant for 2017 Main Stem
Erosion Repair Project.
Mr. Fetter reported that the Commission's Main Stem Project is well positioned to receive grant funding from
Hennepin County to help with the costs of cleaning up and disposing of contaminated sediments. He noted
this is a high priority area for the County and that the grant request would be for approximately$137,000,the
estimated cost of cleanup for the project.
MOTION• Commissioner Black moved that the Commission submit arag nt request for Hennepin County
Environmental Response Funds for the 2017 Main Stem Erosion Repair Project. Seconded by Commissioner
Welch Upon a vote the motion carried 8-0 [City of Minnetonka was 4bsent from the vote.]
E. Review Status of 2016 Operating Budget
Administrator Jester reported that the 2016 operating budget was on track for the year despite some line items
that are over budget, because other areas are under budget. She noted that the revenue received through the
agreements with the Met Council for the Blue Line and Southwest LRT projects nearly equal the amount that
has been spent under"non-fee reviews." Commission Engineer Chandler noted that volume of development
and reviews has been greater than expected. Further, she noted that there are more large projects this year
where the cost to review is greater than the review fees. However, she agreed that overall the budget should
be generally on track at the end of the fiscal year.
F. Consider Approval of Budget Committee Recommendations for 2017 Operating Budget and
Assessments to Cities
Budget Committee Chair McDonald Black reported that the committee met on August 8"', considered the
TAC's recommendations and the recommendations from Derek Asche, City of Plymouth. She noted the
following recommendations: approve an FY 2017 operating budget of$645,600 and city assessments
4
BCWMC August 18, 2016, Meeting Minutes
approximately 2%higher than the FY2016 assessments; approve using CIP funds for the Schaper Pond
Diversion Project effectiveness monitoring; approve using Wenck Associates to perform 2017 routine lake
monitoring; approve using Commission Engineer for the Sweeney Lake aeration study to be funded over two
years; approve receiving input and recommendations from the Technical Advisory Committee on a project
and/or policy related to when and how to go through a"request for proposals"process.
There was some discussion about the City of Plymouth's resolution objecting to the original proposed budget
sent to cities that included a 7% increase in assessments. Mr. Asche noted that while the city was hoping for
a 0% increase in assessments, he appreciated the committee's work to lower assessments from a 7%to a 2%
increase and their willingness to review fiscal policies. Commissioner Welch noted that Plymouth's
recommendations be considered by the Commission and the TAC and that these bodies also consider
suspending the use of an"engineering pool."
MOTION• Commissioner Black moved to approve the Budget Committee's recommendations including a
2% increase in assessments to cities for fiscal year 2017 Seconded by Commissioner Welch. Upon a vote the
motion carried 8-0. [City of Minnetonka was absent from the vote.l
G. Resolution of Appreciation for Services of Amy Herbert to the Bassett Creek Watershed Management
Commission
Although Ms. Herbert wasn't able to attend the meeting,Chair de Lambert read the resolution of appreciation
for her services. Commissioner Welch noted that Ms. Herbert's work with the Commission was essential,
particularly when the Commission did not have an Administrator.
MOTION• Commissioner Mueller moved to approve the resolution of appreciation for the services of Amy
Herbert to the BCWMC Seconded by Alternate Commissioner Crough. Upon a vote the motion carried 8-0.
[City of Minnetonka was absent from the vote.l
6. COMMUNICATIONS
A. Administrator's Report
Administrator Jester reported that she had registered the Commission for a table at the Golden Valley Arts
and Music Festival and that she needed volunteers. Commissioner Welch,Alt. Commissioner Scanlan,and
Chair de Lambert expressed interest in volunteering.
Administrator Jester reported that the Commission was asked to participate in a panel discussion during an
upcoming conference held by the Met Council on developing comprehensive plans. She noted that she would
be happy to represent the Commission on the panel if there were no objections. Commissioners agreed it was
an appropriate activity.
Administrator Jester reported that the Lakeshore Weekly News had agreed to use Dawn Pape as a guest
columnist to write water-related articles on the Commission's behalf. She also asked Commissioners to
consider following the BCWMC on Facebook.
B. Chair
Chair de Lambert reminded Commissioners on the importance of engaging residents at events like the Golden
Valley Arts and Music Festival.
C. Commissioners
No comments.
5
BCWMC August 18, 2016, Meeting Minutes
D. TAC Members
No comments.
E. Committees
i. APM/AIS Committee—Administrator Jester reported that at the second meeting of the APM/AIS
Committee participants reviewed the activities of other organizations regarding APM and AIS. She
indicated the next committee meeting is scheduled for September 27`n
F. Legal Counsel
No comments.
G. Engineer
Commission Engineer Chandler reported that more repairs were needed to anchor the floating baffle on
Schaper Pond and that final site restoration was still needed.
Commission Engineer Chandler reported that the City of Golden Valley has requested a proposal from Barr
Engineering to complete their local water management plan(LWMP). She noted the Commission Engineer
must review all LWMP from member cities so the Commission should consider hiring a separate firm to
review the city's plan. She indicated that this was the same situation 10 years ago for several BCWMC
member cities and at the time,the Commission hired Wenck to review the plans. Commissioners Welch and
Black indicated that this situation was not ideal but that there was no contractual language disallowing the
action. They indicated the Commission would need to hire a different firm to review the Golden Valley
LWMP as before.
Commission Engineer Chandler also noted several Barr-sponsored events coming up in September. She note
everyone is invited to the events and to watch for separate emails.
7. INFORMATION ONLY (Available at)http://www.bassettcreekwmo.org/document/meeting-
materials-minu/meeting-materials/thursda�august-18-2016
A. CIP Project Updates: Now Available Online http://www.bassettcreekwmo.org/projects
B. Grant Tracking Summary and Spreadsheet
C. Clean Water Fund Grant Application—Plymouth Creek Restoration Project
D. Clean Water Fund Grant Application—Harrison Neighborhood Project
E. Interim Report for MPCA Clean Water Partnership Grant for Northwood Lake Improvement Project
F. West Metro Water Alliance June Meeting Minutes
G. Hennepin County Natural Resources Partnership Meeting August 23`d-"Envisioning the future of
environmental education for youth"hqp•//www hennepin us/business/work-with-henn-co/envisioning-future-
environmental-education
H. Clean Water Summit September 22°d, Minnesota Landscape Arboretum, Register at
http://w w.arboretum.umn.edu/2016cleanwatersummit.aspx
I. Water Resources Conference, October 18— 19, St. Paul RiverCentre,http://www.wrc.umn.edu/news-
events/watereonf
8. ADJOURNMENT - Chair de Lambert adjourned the meeting at 10:36 a.m.
Signature/Title Date Signature/Title Date
6
Executive Summary For Action
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
November 15, 2016
Agenda Item
3. E. 1. Award Contract for 2017-2018 Trimming and Removal of Trees on Public Property,
Project No. 17-03
Prepared By
Al Lundstrom, Park Maintenance Supervisor and City Forester
Tim Teynor, Assistant City Forester
Summary
Bids for the 2017-2018 Tree Trimming and Removal of Trees and Stumps Project were opened on
November 3, 2016. The following bids adjusted for estimated quantities were received:
Annual Base Bid Total Over 2 Years
Tim’s Tree Service $ 69,340 $138,680
Jubert Tree $272,800 $545,600
The 2017-2018 Adopted Biennial Budget, Park Maintenance (1646.6440) includes $107,750
identified for annual contractual services related to tree trimming, removal, planting, and
mulching.
Public Works staff has completed the evaluation of bids and determined that Tim’s Tree Service
meets the minimum qualifications for the project.
Recommended Action
Motion to authorize a two-year contract with Tim’s Tree Service in the amount of $138,680 for
trimming and removal of trees on public property.
Executive Summary For Action
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
November 15, 2016
Agenda Item
3. F. Authorize Agreement with Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. (SEH) for preparation of the 2040
Comprehensive Waste Water Plan
Prepared By
Jeff Oliver, PE, City Engineer
Summary
Each community within the seven county metropolitan area is required to prepare a
Comprehensive Waste Water Plan as part of its required 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The required
components of the Plan include a detailed Inflow and Infiltration mitigation strategy, a review of
the sufficiency of the existing system, modeling of the system to identify deficiencies, and
determine future capital needs.
Staff solicited a proposal from SEH, Inc., dated November 1, 2016, to prepare the Comprehensive
Waste Water Plan at a not to exceed cost of $34,600. A copy of the proposal is attached to this
memorandum for reference. The City utilized the services of SEH for water issues for a number of
years, including completion of the 2020 Comprehensive Waster Water Plan and implementation
of the City’s Inflow and Infiltration Reduction Program.
Funding for these services is included in the 2016-2020 Capital Improvement Program (S-35, page
108) in the amount of $107,500.
Attachments
•Contract for professional services from SEH, Inc. to Jeff Oliver, PE, City Engineer dated
November 1, 2016 (4 pages)
Recommended Action
Motion to enter into a professional services agreement with SEH, Inc. for preparation of the
Comprehensive Waste Water Plan at a not to exceed amount of $34,600.
J
SEH
Building a Better World
for All of Us®
November 1, 2016 RE: City of Golden Valley, Minnesota
Met Council 2040 Planning
Sanitary Sewer Comprehensive Planning
SEH No. 137340 GOLDV
Mr.Jeff Oliver, PE
City Engineer
City of Golden Valley
7800 Golden Valley Road
Golden Valley, MN 55427
Dear Jeff:
Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. (SEH®) appreciates the opportunity to submit this proposal to the
City of Golden Valley for updating their Comprehensive Plan for 2018 as required by the Metropolitan
Council. The City's Comprehensive Plan is the part of a long-range planning document for future
development of Golden Valley and the regional metropolitan area.The Comprehensive Plan will identify
the City's goals and objectives for land use, housing, transportation,wastewater and water supply
services, surface water, and natural environment including parks and open spaces.
The following work scope provides an outline of the tasks needed to update the City's sanitary sewer
collection system plan so Golden Valley can complete the wastewater section of their Met Council's
2040 comprehensive plan update. SEH will complete the plan using the previous comprehensive plan,
the City's GIS database, current and future land use plans,water records and 1/1 data to update and
model the City's current sanitary sewer collection system. The existing sanitary sewer model software
(InfoSWMM) product licensed by Innovyze will be updated to determine design capacity in the existing
collection system and any changes needed to handle future development. Our proposal assumes land
use and water consumption data will be provided by the City of Golden Valley. The work scope for
completing this proposal is as follows.
Scope of Work
Task 1 -Existing Wastewater Collection System Review
As the City's sanitary sewer collection system ages,timely operation and maintenance of the system will
be required. As part of the wastewater update, SEH will review city records representing areas of the
City with the respect to pipe material, age and representative condition. We will meet with Golden
Valley maintenance staff and discuss problem areas, review closed circuit television (CCTV)video,
discuss operation and maintenance issues, and access overall collection system performance.
SEH will meet with Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) staff to discuss the status of
their interceptors, O&M issues, and identify capital improvement projects scheduled or planned and
long range plans for the MCES collection system in the area which could impact the City. Comparing this
information with generally accepted pipe longevity data, a guide for scheduling of maintenance and
repair will be provided. Available methods of maintenance and repair of the collection system will be
explored along with options for financing.
Engineers I Architects I Planners I Scientists
Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc.,3535 Vadnais Center Drive,St.Paul,MN 55110-5196
SEH is 100%employee-owned I sehinc.com 1 651.490.2000 1 800.325.2055 1 888.908.8166 fax
Mr. Jeff Oliver, PE
November 1, 2016
Page 2
SEH will review the City's current inflow and infiltration (1/1) prevention plan procedures and
implemented measures to manage clear water entering the sanitary sewer and address MCES policy on
1/1 under the 2040 Water Resources Policy Plan.
Task 2-Evaluate/Assess Golden Valley Sanitary Lift Stations
SEH will perform a site visit to each sanitary sewer lift station owned by the City located in the Golden
Valley sanitary sewer collection system to perform a condition assessment. The evaluation will consist of
the following:
• Perform a draw down test to establish pumping capacity for future modeling.
• Review all existing as-built drawings
• Inspect each station for maintenance and/or operational issues
• Review past operation pump performance with operator to determine if there are any issues or
concerns with performance by staff
• Potential sewer rehabilitation or capital improvements
Task 3-Sanitary Sewer Flow Projections
In order to evaluate the capacity of the existing system,the City's sanitary sewer collection system will
use the existing sewersheds developed under the current 1/1 program. Existing land use and water
usage data from the City's GIS database will be updated to revise average wastewater flows by pipe
section, district and sewershed. Water use trends and anticipated policy decisions will be factored into
the determination of the average wastewater flows. Large commercial users with high water volume
usage will be contacted to determine their existing wastewater component. SEH will review each major
sewer user to determine if any of the commercial/industrial facilities are proposing any usage changes in
the future which may impact overall sewer flows.
Historical MCES wastewater flow data for the City of Golden Valley will be used to evaluate peaking
factors for the system. SEH will review the peaking factor established by the MCES to determine if it is
reasonable. Trends and experiences in other communities; current flow data; inflow and infiltration
data; and evolving local and regional policies will be factored in to evaluate a peaking factor specific to
the City's system. Peaking factors will be assigned appropriately to each sewer district and be used to
determine peak flow conditions in individual reaches of pipe. For the most part,the City is all developed
but does have select areas which could impact future sanitary sewer collection needs. SEH staff will
work with Golden Valley staff and/or the project team to develop the ultimate site use and project
potential increases in wastewater flow demand on the collection system.
Task 4-Develop Sanitary Sewer Collection System Model
As a tool to evaluate existing and future sanitary sewer collection system operation, SEH will update the
existing Golden Valley sanitary sewer model of the collection system using InfoSWMM software. Data
from the previous tasks in this work plan will populate the model with flow data for later calibration in
future tasks. SEH will provide the City the final model and the assumptions used to prepare the final
results. Output from the model will consist of pipe characteristics, required capacity,flow generation
assumptions, peak flow factors, etc.
Mr. Jeff Oliver, PE
November 1, 2016
Page 3
Task 5-Sanitary Sewer Model Calibration
Once the model is populated with the initial sewer flow data, SEH will use available flow monitoring data
collected by MCES and the City to calibrate and check the validity of the data against field wastewater
flow measurements at strategic locations (if possible) in the City's sanitary sewer collection system.
Inflow/Infiltration data collected by MCES and the City during wet weather events from the summer of
2012 will be used to determine existing sanitary sewer collection system capacity during peak events.
Task 6-Evaluate Golden Valley Sanitary Collection System
SEH will review the existing capital improvement plans to identify future sanitary sewer utilize the
calibrated model to analyze the sanitary collection system to determine the following:
• Adequacy of the existing collection system capacity
• Adequacy of the MCES interceptors
• Evaluate existing capacity of current lift stations
• Review collection system for potential operational issues
• Potential sewer rehabilitation or capital improvements
Task 7-Determine Future Sanitary Collection System Needs
SEH will use the results of the previous tasks and the calibrated sanitary sewer model to make
recommendations for long range planning and development of future interceptors to handle anticipate
growth or more likely changes in land use density. SEH will review the following issues.
• Identify potential pipe sizes to accommodate future system demands, as needed
• Optimize alignment and location of future interceptors
• Determine the need, capacity and locations of additional lift stations
• Determine impacts of growth and sewer extensions on the existing collection system
The results of the model will be used to develop capital improvements and recommendations for future
long range planning. Options for financing collection system improvements will also be discussed.
Task 8—Prepare Wastewater Comprehensive Plan
SEH will provide the City with the final deliverable in the format acceptable by the city staff and
prepared as an update to the existing Golden Valley Sanitary Sewer Comprehensive Plan. The report will
present a review of the work completed in the above tasks and assist the City in establishing a capital
improvement plan for future needs.Two review drafts will be provided and a final electronic deliverable
copy will be delivered as a final draft.
Task 9-Planning and Council Meetings
SEH will attend four project meetings with City and/or MCES staff during completion of the wastewater
portion of the comprehensive plan. We propose to attend the following meetings.
• A kick-off meeting with city staff.
• Two staff meetings to discuss progress, issues, and model parameters.
• One MCES staff meeting to discuss interceptor design and planning issues.
SEH will be available for one final meeting with staff or attend city council workshop to review the
overall direction and long range plan for capital wastewater improvements.
Mr. Jeff Oliver, PE
November 1,2016
Page 4
SEH has the staff available to begin the project as soon as the City of Golden Valley presents a notice to
proceed on the project. Our estimated labor and expenses for completion of the project tasks
presented in the Scope of Work listed in our proposal is$34,600. The work scope includes updating the
previous wastewater comprehensive plan along with the sanitary sewer model developed in the original
planning document and addressing the Met Council issues as identified in the Golden Valley system
statement.
If you are in agreement with the terms of this letter, please execute the agreement with the proper
signatures and return one copy to our office. If you have any questions relating to this project, please
call me at 651.490.2144. We look forward to continue working the City of Golden Valley on this
important issue.
Sincerely,
SHORT IOTT HENDRICKSON INC.
Kirby Van Note, PE
Project Manager
kvn
Accepted this day of 12016
CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY, MINNESOTA
By:
Title:
c: Sue Mason, SEH
Executive Summary For Action
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
November 15, 2016
Agenda Item
6. A. Amendment to Chapter 3: Public Utilities of Golden Valley City Code Regarding the Addition
of a Sewer Access Charge and Water Access Charge Ordinance
Prepared By
Jeff Oliver, PE, City Engineer
R.J. Kakach, EIT, Utility Engineer
Summary
As part of the Infrastructure Evaluation Analysis, staff has been working to determine additional
sources of revenue to fund City projects and continue reinvesting in our infrastructure. In
particular, the Sewer and Water Fund has been a priority as these systems approach the end of
their design life, costing more and more to repair and maintain. Several neighboring Cities around
the metro area are utilizing development and redevelopment projects to generate funding for
City infrastructure needs. Specifically, Sewer Access Charges (SAC) and Water Access Charges
(WAC) are utilized to compensate for additional sewer and water demands from new
developments. The Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) already imposes a SAC
charge that goes to fund its infrastructure maintenance and capital needs throughout the metro
area. Staff is recommending that local SAC and WAC charges be adopted to fund City
infrastructure needs.
Staff has drafted an ordinance to incorporate into the City Code that requires all new
development, redevelopment, or changes in use requiring additional MCES SAC units to be
subject to City SAC and WAC fees. The SAC/WAC would be comprised of a Residential Equivalent
Connection (REC) unit multiplied by a dollar amount that would be determined in the fee
resolution. The REC would be determined by the MCES as they currently do for all proposed
developments. A City SAC fee and WAC fee would be established to determine the amount that
each development would be charged for the access to municipal utilities.
The current SAC and WAC fees from neighboring and comparable cities are as follows:
City SAC WAC
St. Louis Park 0 $750
Minnetonka 0 $1,600
Crystal 0 0
New Hope 0 0
Plymouth 0 $1,226
Brooklyn Park 0 $1,875
Maple Grove 0 $2,235
Anoka $1,100 $2,000
Eden Prairie Residential $650 $1160
Eden Prairie Commercial $2830 $3960
Ramsey 0 $1,236
Spring Lake Park 0 $900
Edina $656 $1,310
Roseville 0 0
Wayzata $602 $2,165
Golden Valley (proposed)$650 $1700
Staff is proposing that the fee amounts for SAC and WAC in Golden Valley are as follows:
Sewer Access Charge $ 650.00 Per REC
Water Access Charge $1700.00 Per REC
It should be noted that a number of projects have already received land use approval but are not
yet underway. The ordinance, as drafted, include a grandfather clause to accommodate these
projects. Specifically, the ordinance is proposed to be effective January 1, 2017, for any projects
which have not yet received land use approvals. Any project with land use approvals granted
prior to January 1, 2017, would not be required to pay a city SAC or WAC, unless the project
commences after January 1, 2018.
Attachments
•Ordinance #615, Adding a New Section 3.21 Water Access Charges and Section 3.33 Sewer
Access Charges (3 pages)
•Chapter 3 Table of Contents - underlined/overstruck Language (1 page)
•3.01 Definitions - underlined/overstruck Language (1 page)
•3.21 Water Access Charge - Proposed New Language (1 page)
•3.33 Sewer Access Charge - Proposed New Language (2 pages)
Recommended Action
Motion to adopt on First Consideration, Ordinance #615, Amending Sections 3.01, 3.21, and 3.33
of the Golden Valley City Code.
ORDINANCE NO. 615, 2ND SERIES
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE
Adding a New Section 3.21: Water Access Charges and
Section 3.33: Sewer Access Charges
The City Council for the City of Golden Valley hereby ordains:
Section 1. City Code Section 3.00: Table of Contents is hereby amended by adding
Section "3.21 Water Access Charges" and Section "3.33 Sewer Access Charges"
Section 2. City Code Section 3.01: Definitions is hereby amended by adding the
following definitions and renumbering the definitions accordingly:
15. REC Units: mean residential equivalent connection units, a measure of the maximum
expected impact a property's use (whether residential, commercial, industrial and/or
other) is expected to have on the City's water or sewer system, as applicable.
16. SAC Units: mean the sewer availability charge units determined under the current
Metropolitan Council Environmental Services Procedure Manual for the Sewer
Availability Charge Program.
17. SAC Determination: means a determination of the number of SAC Units required for a
property under the Metropolitan Council Sewer Availability Charge Program as a result
of a new or modified use of the property and/or any development or redevelopment
activity at the property.
Section 3. Chapter 3 of the Golden Valley City Code is hereby amended include a new
Section 3.21 to read in its entirety as follows:
Section 3.21 : Water Access Charges
3.21 : Water Access Charges
Subdivision 1.
In all areas of the City and for all uses, whenever any building permit to be issued by the
City includes authorization for work that requires a SAC Determination, a water access
charge must be paid to the City by the permit applicant or property owner prior to the
issuance of the permit.
Subdivision 2.
The amount of the water access charge shall be based on the number of REC Units
resulting from the use of the City water system due to the work authorized under the
building permit. The number of REC Units shall equal the number of SAC Units determined
under the SAC Determination to which the building permit relates.
Subdivision 3.
The per REC Unit water access charge shall be established in the City's master fee
schedule.
Ordinance No. 615 -2- November 15, 2016
Subdivision 4.
Water access charges collected under this Section shall be deposited into the City's Water
Enterprise Fund, or other similar fund, and shall only be used to finance improvement or
replacement projects for or related to the City's water system, and shall not be transferred
into the City's general fund at any time.
Subdivision 5.
This Section shall only apply to building permits issued after January 1, 2017, provided:
A. This Section shall not apply to:
1. Building permits issued before January 1, 2018, for which the City received the
complete building permit application before January 1, 2017; and
2. Building permits issued before January 1, 2018, which permits are issued for
development or redevelopment projects that received land use approval from the
City prior to January 1, 2017.
Section 4. Chapter 3 of the Golden Valley City Code is hereby amended include a new
Section 3.33 to read in its entirety as follows:
Section 3.33: Sewer Access Charges
Subdivision 1.
In all areas of the City and for all uses, whenever any building permit to be issued by the
City includes authorization for work that requires a SAC Determination, a sewer access
charge must be paid to the City by the permit applicant or property owner prior to the
issuance of the permit.
Subdivision 2.
The amount of the sewer access charge shall be based on the number of REC Units
resulting from the use of the City sewer system due to the work authorized under the
building permit. The number of REC Units shall equal the number of SAC Units determined
under the SAC Determination to which the building permit relates.
Subdivision 3.
The per REC Unit sewer access charge shall be established in the City's master fee
schedule.
Subdivision 4.
Sewer access charges collected under this Section shall be deposited into the City's Sewer
Enterprise Fund, or other similar fund, and shall only be used to finance improvement or
replacement projects for or related to the City's sewer system, and shall not be transferred
into the City's general fund at any time.
Subdivision 5.
In addition to the City's sewer access charge, at the time the City's sewer access charge is
paid, the permit applicant or property owner shall also pay the applicable sewer availability
Ordinance No. 615 -3- November 15, 2016
charge imposed under the Metropolitan Council Sewer Availability Charge Program for the
new or modified use of the property to which the building permit relates.
Subdivision 6.
This Section shall only apply to building permits issued after January 1, 2017, provided:
A. This Section shall not apply to:
1. Building permits issued before January 1, 2018, for which the City received the
complete building permit application before January 1, 2017; and
2. Building permits issued before January 1, 2018, which permits are issued for
development or redevelopment projects that received land use approval by the
City prior to January 1, 2017; and
B. In all instances, including instances where payment of the City SAC is not required
by virtue of this Subdivision 6, no building permit shall be issued if the permit
applicant or property owner has not paid the applicable sewer availability charge
imposed under the Metropolitan Council Sewer Availability Charge Program for the
new or modified use of the property to which the building permit relates.
Section 5. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable
to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 3.99 of City Code
entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as
though repeated verbatim herein.
Section 6. This Ordinance shall take effect from and after its passage and publication as
required by law.
Adopted by the City Council this 15th day of November, 2016.
/s/Shepard M. Harris
Shepard M. Harris, Mayor
ATTEST:
/s/Kristine A. Luedke
Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk
§ 3.00
3 •
Chapter •
MUNICIPAL AND PUBLIC UTILITIES - RULES AND
REGULATIONS, RATES, CHARGES AND
COLLECTIONS
Table of Contents
Section 3.01 Definitions
3.02 Fixing Rates and Charges for Municipal Utilities
3.03 Contractual Contents
3.04 Rules and Regulations Relating to Municipal Utilities
3.05-3.19 Reserved
3.20 Rules and Regulations Relating to Water Services
3.21 Water Access Charges
3.22-3.29 Reserved
3.30 Rules and Regulations Relating to Sanitary Sewer Service
3.31 Certificate of Inflow and Infiltration (I & I) Compliance
3.32 Discharge of Fats, Oils, and Grease (FOG)
3.33 Sewer Access Charges
3.34-3.98 Reserved
3.99 Violation of a Misdemeanor
Golden Valley City Code Page i of i
§ 3.01
9. Interceptor Sewer: means that portion of the sanitary sewer system that
extends outside of the City of Golden Valley and is owned, operated and
maintained by the Metropolitan Council.
Source: Ordinance No. 351, 2nd Series
Effective Date: 10-13-06
10. Inspector: means the City Manager or his/her designee.
Source: Ordinance No. 531, 2nd Series
Effective Date: 10-21-14
11. Joint Water Commission (JWC): means the commission established through
a joint powers agreement between the cities of Golden Valley, Crystal and New
Hope to provide potable water to customers in the three cities.
12. Minneapolis Water Works (MWW): means a municipal water system owned
and operated by the City of Minneapolis.
13. Municipal Utility: means any city-owned utility system, including, but not
limited to water, sanitary sewer and storm sewer service.
14. Owner: means the person or entity that owns or holds the title of a property
served by a municipal utility.
15. REC Units: mean residential equivalent connection units, a measure of the
maximum expected impact a property's use (whether residential commercial
industrial and/or other) is expected to have on the City's water or sewer
system, as applicable.
16. SAC Units: mean the sewer availability charge units determined under the
current Metropolitan Council Environmental Services Procedure Manual for the
Sewer Availability Charge Program.
17. SAC Determination: means a determination of the number of SAC Units
required for a property under the Metropolitan Council Sewer Availability
Charge Program as a result of a new or modified use of the property and/or any
development or redevelopment activity at the property.
Sanitary Sewer System: includes all street lateral, main and intersecting
18. sewers and structures by which sewage or industrial wastes are collected,
transported, treated and disposed of; provided that this shall not include
plumbing inside or a part of a building or premises served, or service sewers
from a building to the sanitary sewer main.
4-6. Service: means providing a particular utility to a customer or consumer.
19.
Source: Ordinance No. 351, 2nd Series
Effective Date: 10-13-06
Golden Valley City Code
§ 3.21
3.21: Water Access Charges
Subdivision 1.
In all areas of the City and for all uses, whenever any building permit to be
issued by the City includes authorization for work that requires a SAC
Determination, a water access charge must be paid to the City by the permit
applicant or property owner prior to the issuance of the permit.
Subdivision 2.
The amount of the water access charge shall be based on the number of REC
Units resulting from the use of the City water system due to the work
authorized under the building permit. The number of REC Units shall equal
the number of SAC Units determined under the SAC Determination to which
the building permit relates.
Subdivision 3.
The per REC Unit water access charge shall be established in the City's
master fee schedule.
Subdivision 4.
Water access charges collected under this Section shall be deposited into the
City's Water Enterprise Fund, or other similar fund, and shall only be used to
finance improvement or replacement projects for or related to the City's
water system, and shall not be transferred into the City's general fund at any
time.
Subdivision S.
This Section shall only apply to building permits issued after January 1, 2017,
provided:
A. This Section shall not apply to:
1. Building permits issued before January 1, 2018, for which the City
received the complete building permit application before January 1,
2017; and
2. Building permits issued before January 1, 2018, which permits are
issued for development or redevelopment projects that received land
use approval from the City prior to January 1, 2017.
§ 3.33
3.33 Sewer Access Charges
Subdivision 1.
In all areas of the City and for all uses, whenever any building permit to be issued
by the City includes authorization for work that requires a SAC Determination, a
sewer access charge must be paid to the City by the permit applicant or property
owner prior to the issuance of the permit.
Subdivision 2.
The amount of the sewer access charge shall be based on the number of REC Units
resulting from the use of the City sewer system due to the work authorized under
the building permit. The number of REC Units shall equal the number of SAC Units
determined under the SAC Determination to which the building permit relates.
Subdivision 3.
The per REC Unit sewer access charge shall be established in the City's master fee
schedule.
Subdivision 4.
Sewer access charges collected under this Section shall be deposited into the City's
Sewer Enterprise Fund, or other similar fund, and shall only be used to finance
improvement or replacement projects for or related to the City's sewer system, and
shall not be transferred into the City's general fund at any time.
Subdivision S.
In addition to the City's sewer access charge, at the time the City's sewer access
charge is paid, the permit applicant or property owner shall also pay the applicable
sewer availability charge imposed under the Metropolitan Council Sewer Availability
Charge Program for the new or modified use of the property to which the building
permit relates.
Subdivision 6.
This Section shall only apply to building permits issued after January 1, 2017,
provided:
A. This Section shall not apply to:
1. Building permits issued before January 1, 2018, for which the City
received the complete building permit application before January 1, 2017;
and
2. Building permits issued before January 1, 2018, which permits are issued
for development or redevelopment projects that received land use
approval by the City prior to January 1, 2017; and
B. In all instances, including instances where payment of the City SAC is not
§ 3.33
required by virtue of this Subdivision 6, no building permit shall be issued if
the permit applicant or property owner has not paid the applicable sewer
availability charge imposed under the Metropolitan Council Sewer Availability
Charge Program for the new or modified use of the property to which the
building permit relates.
Executive Summary For Action
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
November 15, 2016
Agenda Item
6. B. First Consideration - Ordinance #616 - Establishing A 2017 Master Fee Schedule
Prepared By
Sue Virnig, Finance Director
Summary
Staff has reviewed the following master fee schedule with the Council at the Council Manager
Meeting on November 9. This schedule shows the approved rates for 2016 and notes the changes
to 2017 rates by using bold or highlighted sections. This is the first consideration. The utility rates
will be effective for any billing after April 1, 2017. The second consideration will be December 6,
2016.
Attachments
•Ordinance #616, Establishing A 2017 Master Fee Schedule (17 pages)
Recommended Action
Motion to adopt on First Consideration, Ordinance #616, Establishing A 2017 Master Fee
Schedule.
ORDINANCE NO. 616, 2ND SERIES
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE
Establishing A 2016 Master Fee Schedule
The City Council for the City of Golden Valley hereby ordains:
Section 1. The City Code requires that certain fees for City services and licenses be
established from time to time by the City Council.
Section 2. The Master Fee Schedule attached hereto as Exhibit A is hereby
adopted as the city’s fee schedule effective January 1, 2017, unless otherwise noted and
shall be added to Chapter 25 of the City Code.
Section 3. City Code Chapter 1 entitled “General Provisions and Definitions
Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation” is hereby adopted in its
entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein.
Section 4. This ordinance shall take effect from and after its passage and
publication as required by law.
Adopted by the City Council this 15
th day of November, 2016.
/s/Shepard M. Harris
Shepard M. Harris, Mayor
ATTEST:
/s/Kristine A. Luedke
Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk
City of Golden Valley
2017 Proposed Master Fee Schedule-Exhibit A
2016 Adopted 2017 Proposed
Fee Fee
Permits
If the work has been started the fee will double for all permits such as building,plumbing,
mechanical,and electrical.
All building permit values will be based on the current Minnesota Department of Labor
and Industry Building Valuation Data.
Plan Review Fee May Be Due at time Plans are Submitted at City Discretion on Projects Over 2 Million 65%of Fee
Building&Fire Permit Fees based on fee schedule below.
Mandatory State Surcharge:per permit is a minimum of.50 and when a permit
fee is over$1,000 in value the state surcharge is.0005 times the permit value.
Surcharge is remitted to MN State Treasurer.
Permit Cancellation Policy:80%of the permit fee will be returned upon written
notice of cancellation. If job has been started no refund will be made.
Cancellation request must be made within 180 days of permit issue date.
No surcharge or plan review fees will be returned(includes the fees for
stormwater management,right-of-way(ROW)and tree preservation permits).
Building/Fire/Commercial Mechanical Plan Review Fee-65%of the permit fee(no surcharge)
re-inspection fee 100.00 100.00
Sewer Access Charge(SAC) 650 per Unit
Water Access Charge(WAC) 1,700 per Unit
SAC&WAC Charges shall be based on the Residential Equivalent Connection Units(REC)
resulting from the use of the City Water/Sewer systems.The REC shall equal
the number of SAC Units determined under the SAC Determination to which the
building permit relates.
Administrative 75.00 75.00
Seasonal,Farm Produce,Christmas Tree Sales,etc in Commercial
Zoning District
Electrical
State Surcharge-each permit 5.00 1.00
All Services new,replace or repair
There is a$2 per circuit charge for replacing circuits that are disconnected in the old
service panel and reconnected in the new panel.
0 to 300 Amp 50.00
400 Amp 58.00
500 Amp 72.00
600 Amp 86.00
800 Amp 114.00
1000 Amp 142.00
1100 Amp 156.00
1200 Amp 170.00
Add$14.00 for each additional 100 Amps.
Circuits and Feeders
The inspection fee for the installation,addition,alteration or repair of each circuit,
feeder,feeder tap or set of transformer secondary conductors:
0 to 30 Amp 8.00
31 to 100 Amp 10.00
101 to 200 Amp 15.00
300 Amp 20.00
400 Amp 25.00
500 Amp 30.00
600 Amp 35.00
700 Amp 40.00
Add$5.00 for each additional 100 Amps.
Minimum Fee
Minimum permit fee is$40.00 plus$1.00 State surcharge.This is for one inspection only.
Minimum fee for rough-in inspection and final is$80.00 plus$1.00 State surcharge.
Maximum Fee
Maximum fee for single family dwelling or townhouse not over 200 Amps is$175.00
plus$1.00 State surcharge.Maximum of 3 inspections.
1
City of Golden Valley
2017 Proposed Master Fee Schedule-Exhibit A
2016 Adopted 2017 Proposed
Fee Fee
Permits(continued)
Electrical(continued)
Apartment Buildings
Fee per unit of an apartment or condominium complex.This does not cover $80 per unit $80 per unit
service and house wiring.
Swimming Pool $80.00 This includes 2 inspections
Additons,Remodels or Basement Finishes $80.00 This includes up to 10 circuits and 2 inspections
Accessory Structures $50.00 for panel plus$8.00 per circuit
Traffic Signals $7.00 per each standard
Street Lights and parking lot lights $4.00 per each standard
Transformers and Generators $10.00-up to 10 KVA,$40.00-11 to 74 KVA,
$60.00-75 KVA to 299 KVA,$150.00-over 300 KVA
Retro Fit Lighting $.65 per fixture
Sign Transformer $8.00 per transformer
Remote Control and Signal Circuits $.75 per device
Reinspection fee $40.00
Fire Alarm System(New Installation or Alteration of Existing)
Up to the 1st$1,200 in value 50.00 50.00
Over $1,200 value-use fire suppression fee
Fire Commercial Cooking Ventilation Systems
Inspection 75.00 75.00
Re-inspection 150.00 150.00
Fire Pumps 200.00 200.00
Fire Suppression&Special Fire Suppression Systems:
FM 200 system,CO2 systems,spray booths,kitchen extinguisher systems,hoods,etc. No change No change
Total valuation based on below fee schedule:
Value Range 2004 LMC/AMM Recommendation
$150 $500 $25.00
$501 $2,000 $25.00 for the first$500
$3.25/additional$100
$2,001 $25,000 $73.50 for the first$2,000
$14.75/additional$1,000
$25,001 $50,000 $415.75 for the first$25,000
$10.75/additional$1,000
$50,001 $100,000 $682.50 for the first$50,000
$7.50/additional$1,000
$100,001 $500,000 $1,053.50 for the first$100,000
$6.00/additional$1,000
$500,001 $1,000,000 $3,427.75 for the first$500,000
$5.00/additional$1,000
$1,000,001 and up $5,945.25 for the first$1,000,000
$4.00/additional$1,000
Fireworks/Pyrotechnic Special Effects 100.00 100.00
Permit requires rental of fire engine and crew for stand-by at display
House/Building
Moving 300.00 500.00
Demolition 300.00 500.00
2
City of Golden Valley
2017 Proposed Master Fee Schedule-Exhibit A
2016 Adopted 2017 Proposed
Fee Fee
Permits(continued)
Mechanical:HVAC,Gas Piping,Refrigeration and Fireplace
(Includes all types of fireplaces-masonry,gas,gas log,gas insert,etc.)
Value Permit charge
$0- $999 $25.00
$1,001- $5,000 $31.50+2.60%over$1000
$5,001- $10,000 $135.50+2.15%over$5000
$10,001- $25,000 $243.00+1.85%over$10,000
$25,000- $50,000 $520.50+1.65%over$25,000
$50,001- over 1$933.00+1.30%over$50,000
State Surcharge is$.50 for a Value of$1,000 or Less.
If the Value is over$1,000 the State Surcharge is(Value X.0005).
Mobile Food Vending
Non-residential zoning districts
Up to 3 days(City Parks-limit 3 days) $40 per day $40 per day
Up to 120 days 150.00 150.00
Native Vegetation Landscape Permit 100.00 100.00
Parade/Special Event 25.00 25.00
Petroleum/Compress Gas Tanks
Installation-per dispenser 75.00 75.00
Installation-per tank 75.00 75.00
Piping associated with tanks 75.00 75.00'
Removal-per tank 75.00 75.00
Temporary LP Tank(per site) 75.00 75.00
Temporary above ground fuel tanks(per site) 75.00 75.00
Plan Review Fee-65%of the fee(no surcharge)
Plumbing and Piping Fixtures
Includes hydraulic sewer valves,rain water leaders,and alteration to existing systems.
Value Permit charge
$0- $999 $25.00
$1,001- $5,000 $31.50+2.60%over$1000
$5,001- $10,000 $135.50+2.15%over$5000
$10,001- $25,000 $243.00+1.85%over$10,000
$25,001- $50,000 $520.50+1.65%over$25,000
$50,001- over 1$933.00+1.30%over$50,000
State Surcharge is$.50 for a Value of$1,000 or Less.
If the Value is over$1,000 the State Surcharge is(Value X.0005).
Right Of Way
Driveway Replacement Permit 100.00 100.00
Permanent Obstruction Permit,per obstruction(includes courtesy benches) 100.00 100.00
Temporary Obstruction permit No Charge No Charge
Temporary Access Permit 25.00 25.00
In Boulevard Excavation Permit per opening 100.00 100.00
In Pavement Excavation Permit per opening(includes curb alterations) 200.00 200.00
Overhead Utility Repair per location No Charge No Charge
Underground Utility:
Length Permit Charge
0 to 100 Feet $250 administrative fee+$1/foot
over 100 Feet $350 administrative fee+$.50/foot over 100 feet
Service Drop meeting conditions: No charge No charge
Not parallel to right-of way
at least 10'from any City facility or utility,
less than 1'wide,and depth in accord with law or,if none,industry standard
3
City of Golden Valley
2017 Proposed Master Fee Schedule-Exhibit A
2016 Adopted 2017 Proposed
Fee Fee
Permits(continued)
Stormwater Management
Projects that do not require watershed review-No post construction BMPs 100.00 100.00
Projects that require watershed review require Post Construction BMPs 300.00 300.00
Sign Permit
Base fee 50.00 50.00
Area fee(per sq ft of sign area) +3.00/sq ft +3.00/sq ft
Plan Review(Pylon and Monument Signs) 40.00 40.00
Standpipe
Installation of each standpipe(up to 5 floors) 50.00 50.00
Each additional floor 25.00 25.00
Temporary Certificate of Occupancy
Partial Certificate of Occupancy 100.00 100.00
Temporary Certificate of Occupancy 100.00 100.00
Extension of Temporary Certificate of Occupancy 200.00 200.00
Penalty for expired Temporary Certificate of Occupancy 300.00 300.00
Tent/Canopy Inspections-required for tent exceeding 200 sq ft and 50.00 50.00
canopies exceeding 400 sq ft(per site)
each additional tent and/or canopy(per site) 25.00 25.00
Tree and Landscape Permit 150.00 150.00
Utility Permits
Water Meter Permit 100.00 100.00
Water Tapping Permit 100.00 100.00
Water Cut-off Permit 100.00 100.00
Sewer Permit(connection) 100.00 100.00
Sewer Repair Permit 100.00 100.00
Sewer Cut-off Permit 100.00 100.00
Sewer&Water Permits for Commercial Projects(Fee Based on Plumbing Value and
if there is a Plan the Plan Review Fee would be 65%of the Fee)
State Surcharge-each permit 1.00
Licenses
Renewal Date
Auctioning
Auctioneers do not need to be licensed in the City of Golden Valley.However,they have to show
us a copy of a license or bond from the county or state and provide us a letter on the date,time and
place of the auction.
Chicken Coop License
Initial Application Fee 75.00 75.00
Annual License Renewal Fee 1-Apr 25.00 25.00
Cigarettes-Tobacco Products over the counter 1-Jan 275.00 275.00
Contractors-Heating,Ventilation,Air Cond and Refrigeration 1-Apr 75.00 75.00
Dog Kennel-per kennel 1-Apr 200.00 200.00
Entertainment
Amusement and Shows 1-Apr 50.00 50.00
(movies-per screen;caravans,circuses,amusement rides)
Bowling Alley(each lane) 1-Apr 15.00 15.00
Dancing&Entertainment 1-Apr 375.00 375.00
Pinball Machine,Video Game or Pool Table
each location 1-Apr 15.00 15.00
each device 1-Apr 15.00 15.00
4
City of Golden Valley
2017 Proposed Master Fee Schedule-Exhibit A
2016 Adopted 2017 Proposed
Fee Fee
Licenses(continued)
Renewal Date
Fireworks
Retail consumer fireworks that sell other items 1-May 100.00 100.00
Retail consumer fireworks,retailers that sell only fireworks 1-May 350.00 350.00
Garbage Haulers-per vehicle 1-Apr 50.00 50.00
(See also Recylcing Haulers)
Gasoline Stations Per Location
Dispensers 1-4(each) 1-Apr 75.00 75.00
Over four dispensers(each) 50.00 50.00
Lawful Gambling License 1-Jan
First year 250.00 250.00
Renewal after 1st year 100.00 100.00
Liquor License Application Packet 20.00 20.00
Liquor-Investigation Fee
(Liquor On-sale,Off-sale,and Sunday sale and Wine) new applicant 3,000.00 3,000.00
$500.00 non-refundable administrative fee plus actual costs for investigation
Liquor-Miscellaneous Change thru the year per change 100.00 100.00
Liquor On,Off and Sunday Sale and Wine(renewal or misc changes)
Liquor License(State law)
Sunday sale 1-Jul 200.00 200.00
Off-sale 340A.408 1-Jul 200.00 200.00
On-sale 1-Jul 8,000.00 8,000.00
Wine On-sale 1-Jul 2,000.00 2,000.00
Club 1-Jul
up to 200 members 300.00 300.00
200-500 members 500.00 500.00
501-1,000 members 650.00 650.00
1,001-2,000 members 800.00 800.00
2001-4000 members 1,000.00 1,000.00
4001-6000 members 2,000.00 2,000.00
Over 6000 members 3,000.00 3,000.00
Liquor-On-sale 1-Jul
Non-Intoxicating Malt 500.00 500.00
Brewer Tap Room 600.00 600.00
Cocktail Room 600.00 600.00
Liquor-Off-sale 1-Jul
Non-Intoxicating Malt 150.00 150.00
Brew Pub-Malt Liquor 200.00 200.00
Small Brewer 200.00 200.00
Distilled Spirits 200.00 200.00
Liquor-Temporary Non-Intoxicating/Intoxicatng Malt Liquor License Section 5.31-City Code 100.00 100.00
Liquor-Investigation Fee 500.00 500.00
Massage Therapist-Individual
Certificate(each individual/person) 1-Jan 100.00 100.00
Investigation fee 100.00 100.00
5
City of Golden Valley
2017 Proposed Master Fee Schedule-Exhibit A
2016 Adopted 2017 Proposed
Fee Fee
Licenses(continued)
Renewal Date
Massage Therapist Premise License 1-Jan
Operating location 500.00 500.00
Investigation fee 200.00 200.00
New/Used Vehicle Sales 1-Sep 400.00 400.00
Peddlers and Solicitors 1-Jan
Each Employee(background check/Identification card) 30.00 30.00
Pawnbroker and Precious Metal
Dealer Location 1-Jan 5,000.00 5,000.00
Dealer 1-Jan 400.00 400.00
Investigation Fee 3,000.00 3,000.00
$500.00 non-refundable administrative fee plus actual costs for investigation
APS Transaction Fee 1.30 1.30
Recycling Haulers(Multi Family Apartment) -per vehicle 1-Apr 50.00 50.00
Rental Dwelling License
Single Family Dwellings
One Unit Dwelling License Expires July 1 125.00 125.00
Re-inspection 100.00 100.00
Twin Homes&Duplexes License per Dwelling Unit Expires May 1 125.00 125.00
Re-inspection(per unit/per address) 100.00 100.00
Condominiums&Townhomes License Per Dwelling Unit Expires Sept 1 125.00 125.00
Re-inspection(per unit/per address) 100.00 100.00
Group Homes/homes with services Expires Nov 1 125.00 125.00
License Per Dwelling Unit
Re-inspection(per unit/per address) 100.00 100.00
Multiple Unit Dwelling(3 or more units)per building 1-Mar
3-50 Units 125.00 175.00
51-150 Units 175.00 225.00
151+Units 250.00 300.00
Re-inspection(per building/per address) 100.00 100.00
i e T-Fa sfeF(PF9 Fate) FA Ri FA U Fn 50:80 delete
Star Program Fees(Based on participation level)
Non-Participant $35/unit $35/unit
Level $20/unit $20/unit
Level $12/unit $12/unit
Level $8/unit $8/unit
Level $0/unit $0/unit
Administrative Citations on(all)Rental Dwellings
1st citation 100.00 100.00
2nd citation 250.00 250.00
3rd citation 500.00 500.00
4th citation and subsequent violations in 12 month period 500.00 500.00
Citation Appeal 25.00 25.00
Sexually Oriented Business
License Fee(operating location) 1-Jan 5,000.00 5,000.00
Investigation Fee 3,000.00 3,000.00
$500.00 non-refundable administrative fee plus actual costs for investigation
6
City of Golden Valley
2017 Proposed Master Fee Schedule-Exhibit A
2016 Adopted 2017 Proposed
Fee Fee
Street Assessments
Residential/Single Family/Duplex,per dwelling unit on local street 6,600.00 6,600.00
Multi Unit Residential(more than 2 dwelling units)on local street 76.3/ft 76.3/ft
Residential/Single Family/Duplex,per dwelling unit on state aid street 1,650.00 1,650.00
Multi Unit Residential(more than 2 dwelling units)on state aid street 81.71/ft 81.71/ft
Other Zonings,Local Streets 91.73/ft 91.73/ft
Other Zonings,State Aid Streets 99.21/ft 99.21/ft
Administrative Fee for Driveways and/or Sanitary Sewer repairs $250/maximum $250/maximum
(Seven percent of total or maximum fee-whichever lessor)
Low Income Level for Senior/Retired due to Disability Deferral 2015 HUD Limits 2016 HUD Limits
Miscellaneous Fees
Address Change 50.00 50.00
Administrative Citations-Non Rental Housing
1st Citation 100.00 100.00
2nd Citation 250.00 250.00
3rd Citation 500.00 500.00
4th Citation and subsequent violations in 12 month period 500.00 500.00
Alarm System-False Alarms(12 month period beginning March 1 of each year upon given notice)
1-3 false alarms
4-10 false alarms 100.00 100.00
11-15 false alarms 150.00 150.00
16 or more false alarms 250.00 250.00
Animal Control
Impound Fee for dogs 50.00 50.00
Boarding Fee for dogs and cats per day(7 day maximum) 20.00 20.00
Dangerous Dog License 250.00 250.00
Building Plan/Storage Retrieval 50.00 50.00
Carseat Installations/Inspections
Non-resident 20.00 20.00
Each additional 10.00 10.00
Certification Fee(Special Assessment) 30.00 30.00
City Cemetery
Cemetery Plot 500.00 500.00
Open/Close Fee:
Crematory(up to 2 per lot) 200.00 each 200.00 each
Burial 750.00 750.00
Documents
City Code
Full book in binder 200.00 200.00
Updates 15/each 15/each
Zoning Chapters Only 10.00 10.00
City Maps:,Plats,Record Drawings,Other Plats(i.e.address maps,building plans,comp plan,z 10.00 10.00
Comprehensive Plan
Copies of any black and white,letter or legal size documents of 100 or .25/pg .25/pg
fewer pages(Minnesota Rules,part 1205.0300,subpart 4.)
Copies of any color,letter or legal size documents .33/page .33/page
Digital Format
Aerial photography time&material time&material
Custom Maps or Map Layers time&material time&material
Topography time&material time&material
Special Assessment Search(non-owner) 15.00 15.00
Video Reproduction(per tape,DVD,CD+shipping) 20.00 20.00
7
City of Golden Valley
2017 Proposed Master Fee Schedule-Exhibit A
2016 Adopted 2017 Proposed
Fee Fee
Miscellaneous Fees(continued)
Domestic Partner Registration
Initial Registration 40.00 40.00
Amendment/Notice of Termination 25.00 25.00
Certified copy of Registration 5.00 5.00
Equipment Charge per hour
Fire Engine(includes personnel) 250.00 250.00
Fire Aerial Truck(includes personnel) 350.00 350.00
Police and Fire Rescue Truck(includes personnel) 250.00 250.00
Utility Vehicle(includes personnel) 100.00 100.00
Squad Car(includes personnel) 100.00 100.00
Utility Equipment(sewer jet,vac truck,sewer camera,sewer rodder) 200.00 200.00
Heavy(front end loader,360 Backhoe,Pickup sweeper, 125.00 125.00
tandem axle truck,aerial truck) does not include personnel costs
Medium(single axle dump truck,water truck,tractor backhoe,utility tractor/ 80.00 80.00
accessory,15 ft cut lawn mower,brush chipper,asphalt roller,asphalt paver,
skid steer,tool cat,trackless)does not include personnel costs
Light(truck-one ton and under,air compressor,water pump,generator, 45.00 45.00
steamer,asphalt/saw,concrete,cable tracer)does
not include personnel costs
Fire Boat(includes personnel) 75.00 75.00
Fire ATV(includes personnel) 75.00 75.00
Fire Life Safety Trailer(includes personnel) 200.00 200.00
Gas Lines,construction damage with Fire Department Response 250.00 250.00
Floor Dry(Accidents) 20.00/bag
Filing Fee(Administrative Citation Appeal)per violation 25.00 25.00
Fingerprinting
Golden Valley Resident 10.00 10.00
Anyone employed in GV 25.00 25.00
Additional Card
Forced Tree Removal cost of cost of
removal+20% removal+20%
Forfeited DWI Vehicle Administrative Fee 1000.00 1000.00
Hydrant Meter Rental
Residential(per day+consumption) 2.00 2.00
Commercial(per day+consumption) 5.00 5.00
Commercial(rate per day after 60 days+consumption) 10.00
Deposit(residential) 200.00 300.00
Deposit(commercial) 1000.00 1750.00
Nuisance Service Call Fee(after three calls) 250.00 250.00
Personnel
Off Duty Police Officer(minimum applies as determined by 75/hr 75/hr
City Manager/designee)
PiFefighteFs Lieutenants,Captain Bat-.II'....r'h4ef 9[ hF
/
Full-time Fire Personnel �7 ^* 75/hr
Paid On-Call Fire Personnel 35/hr
Public Works Employee 60/hr 62/hr
minimum minimum
Sump Pump Inspection 50.00 50.00
8
City of Golden Valley
2017 Proposed Master Fee Schedule-Exhibit A
2016 Adopted 2017 Proposed
Fee Fee
Miscellaneous Fees(continued)
Weed Eradication/Lawn mowing-per hour(see minimums)
Occupied/unoccupied residential/commercial property-3 hour minimum 125/hr 125/hr
SECOND OR MORE VIOLATIONS IN ONE SEASON
Occupied/unoccupied residential/commercial property-3 hour minimum 250/hr 250/hr
Planning&Zoning Fees
Comprehensive Plan Amendment 500.00 500.00
Conditional Use Items
Conditional Use Permit 400.00 400.00
Amendment to Conditional Use Permit 300.00 300.00
Extension for Conditional Use Permit 125.00 125.00
Easement Vacation(each request) 500.00 500.00
Flood Control Management(Special Permit) 75.00 75.00
Floodplain Search Letter 25.00 25.00
Park Dedication Fees 4%of Land 6%of Land
(per Minnesota Statute 462.358)
Planned Unit Development
Preliminary Design Plan 600.00 600.00
Final Plan of Development 600.00 600.00
Extension of Planned Unit Development 150.00 150.00
Planned Unit Development Major Amendment 400.00 400.00
Planned Unit Development Minor Amendment 250.00 250.00
Planned Unit Development-Administrative Amendment 100.00 100.00
Rezoning 500.00 500.00
Subdivision 400.00 400.00
Extension to Submit Final Plat 125.00 125.00
Subdivision-Minor 250.00 250.00
Extension to Submit Final Plat 125.00 125.00
Variance from City Code- Zoning Chapters
Single family residential 200.00 200.00
Extension 150.00 150.00
All others 300.00 300.00
Extension 150.00 150.00
Wetland Management(plus professional fees if necessary) 75.00 75.00
Zoning Examination Letter 100.00 100.00
Temporary Retail Sales in Industrial Zone 150.00 150.00
(for each sale,up to five days)
9
City of Golden Valley
2017 Proposed Master Fee Schedule-Exhibit A
2016 Adopted 2017 Proposed
Fee Fee
Utility Fees
Driveway Covers-Replace 150.00 150.00
Hydrant Inspection(Private) 3.75/month 3.75/month
Hydrant Maintenance(Private) Actual Cost Actual Cost
materials,parts, materials,parts,
labor+20% labor+20%
admin admin
Meter Testing(to be returned if meter is in error of 5%or more of read) 50.00 50.00
Sanitary Sewer Inspections and Compliance Fees(Ordinance No.352)
Noncompliant discharge into sanitary sewer(or refuse inspection)
Single Family Residential 500/month 500/month
Non Single Family Residential 1000/month 1000/month
Application fee for noncompliant winter discharge into sanitary sewer 250.00 250.00
Application fee for certificate of sewer regulations compliance
Single Family Residential(R-1 or R-2),per structure 250.00 250.00
Non Single Family Residential(all other structures),per structure 750.00 750.00
Fee to review residential video record completed by private licensed plumber 100.00 100.00
Fee to review non-residential video record completed by private licensed plumber 375.00 375.00
Water on/off per each event (business day) 100.00 25.00
(after hours) 165.00 175.00
Utility-Manual Read of Water/Sewer Meter 100.00 100.00
Water Meter and Parts(All) At cost+20% At cost+20%
Utility Billing Rates-Effective April 1,2016 4/1/2017
Residential Utility Rates-quarterly billing
(includes all residential classes except those classified as apartments)
ACH Payment Credit (1.00) (1.00)
Inspection Fee for Fire lines 6.00 6.00
Penalties(for late payment) 10% 10%
Sanitary Sewer(in 1000 gallons)
Residential(per dwelling unit)(Flat Rate)-5 and under units-winter qtr consumption 59.19 62.15
Residential(per dwelling unit)(Flat Rate)-6-15 units-winter qtr consumption 63.81 67.11
Residential(per dwelling unit)(Flat Rate)-16-19 units-winter qtr consumption 69.89 73.82
Residential(per dwelling unit)(Flat Rate)-20-25 units-winter qtr consumption 79.93 84.15
Residential(per dwelling unit)(Flat Rate)-26-39 units-winter qtr consumption 104.31 110.25
Residential(per dwelling unit)(Flat Rate)-40-59 units-winter qtr consumption 120.12 126.96
Residential(per dwelling unit)(Flat Rate)-60-79 units-winter qtr consumption 127.53 134.76
Residential(per dwelling unit)(Flat Rate)-80 to 99 units-winter qtr consumption 146.10 154.41
Residential(per dwelling unit)(Flat Rate)-100 and over units-winter qtr consumption 173.40 183.26
Recycling
Residential curbside(per unit) 14.00 14.00
Storm Sewer Utility Rate
Charge for a Residential Equivalent Factor of 1.00 66.00 68.00
Each single family residential property is considered to be 1/3 of an acre.
10
City of Golden Valley
2017 Proposed Master Fee Schedule-Exhibit A
2016 Adopted 2017 Proposed
Fee Fee
Utility Billing Rates-Effective April 1,2016(continued) 4/1/2017
Residential Utility Rates-quarterly billing
Street Lights
Ornamental(per unit) 11.13 11.61
Overhead(per unit) 7.56 8.00
Water
Minimum fee,includes up to 1,000 gallons of flow 9.60 11.00
Water meters up to and including 1" 9.60 11.00
Water meters over 1"and including 2" 66.14 75.78
Water meters over 2"and including 4" 92.35 105.81
Water meters over 4" 118.37 134.94
Above 1,000 gallons of flow per quarter up to 79,000(per 1,000 gallons) 5.65 6.00
80,000 gallons and over of flow per quarter(per 1,000 gallons) 5.68 6.03
Emergency Water Supply(per 1,000 gallons of flow) Eff 11-1-16 0.20/.30 0.30
Water Connection Fee(State Charge for each water hookup) 1.59 1.59
Irrigation Accounts(All)-Monthly Billing
Minimum fee,includes up to 1,000 gallons of flow 9.60 11.00
Above 1,000 gallons of flow per month(per 1,000 gallons) 5.68 6.03
ACH Payment Credit (once converted to Invoice Cloud-no credit
(1.00) (1.00)
Commercial&Industrial Utility Rates-monthly billing
ACH Payment Credit (once converted to Invoice Cloud-no credit
(1.00) (1.00)
Inspection Fee for Fire lines 2.00 2.00
Penalties(for late payment on monthly billings) 5% 5%
Sanitary Sewer
Water meters up to and including 1" 8.61 9.60
Water meters over 1"and including 2" 22.05 24.60
Water meters over 2"and including 4" 30.78 34.16
Water meters over 4" 39.46 43.80
Based on per 1,000 gallons 4.15 4.45
Note:Water Meter Flow is used to establish sewer flow unless a
separate sewer flow meter has been established.
Storm Sewer Utility Rate
Charge per acre for property X Residential Equivalency Factor(REF) 66.00 68.00
Street Lights
Ornamental(per unit) 3.71 3.87
Overhead(per unit) 2.52 2.67
Water Connection Fee (State Charge for each water hookup) 0.53 0.53
Water Usage:
Minimum fee,includes up to 1,000 gallons of flow 9.60 11.00
Water meters up to and including 1" 9.60 11.00
Water meters over 1"and including 2" 22.05 26.25
Water meters over 2"and including 4" 30.78 35.27
Water meters over 4" 39.46 44.98
Water rate above 1,000 gallons 5.65 6.00
Emergency Water Supply(per 1,000 gallons of flow) (eff 11-1-16) 0.20 0.30
11
City of Golden Valley
2017 Proposed Master Fee Schedule-Exhibit A
2016 Adopted 2017 Proposed
Fee Fee
Brookview Golf Course Rates
Regulation Course
18 Hole Non-patron 37.00 37.00
18 Hole Patron 30.00 30.00
18 Hole Sr Patron 26.00 26.00
18 Hole Non-patron Senior Rate 30.00 30.00
18 Hole Non-patron League 37.00 37.00
18 Tournament 37.00 37.00
9 Hole Non-patron 20.00 20.00
9 Hole Patron 17.00 17.00
9 Hole Sr Patron 15.50 15.50
9 Hole Non-patron Senior 17.00 17.00
9 Hole Non-patron League 20.00 20.00
9 Hole Tournament 20.00 20.00
2nd Nine Non-patron 17.00 17.00
2nd Nine Patron 13.00 13.00
Sunrise/Sunset Rate 17.00 17.00
Twilight Non-patron 21.00 21.00
Twilight Patron 17.00 17.00
Junior Rate Patron 21.00/12.00 22.50/12.50
Junior Rate Non Patron 23.00/14.00 24.50/14.50
Par 3 Course
9 Hole Non-patron 12.50 12.50
9 Hole patron 9.00 9.00
9 Hole Sr Patron 8.00 8.00
9 Hole Non-patron Senior Rate 9.50 9.50
9 Hole League 12.50 12.50
9 Hole Tournament 12.50 12.50
9 Hole Junior Rate 8.00 8.00
9 Hole Junior Non-Patron Rate 9.50 9.50
2nd 9 Par 3 7.50 7.50
Patron Cards
Resident Adult Patron 75.00/70.00 75.00/70.00
Non-resident Adult Patron 115.00/110.00 115.00/110.00
Resident Senior Patron(age 62+) 45.00/40.00 45.00/40.00
Non-resident Senior Patron(age 62+) 80.00/75.00 80.00/75.00
Resident Junior Patron(17 yrs&under) 35.00/30.00 35.00/30.00
Non-resident Junior(17 yrs&under) 40.00/35.00 40.00/35.00
Par 3 Patron Card 30.00 30.00
Driving Range
Warm Up Bucket 4.00 4.00
Small Bucket 6.00 6.00
Large Bucket 8.00 8.00
10 Bucket Punch Pass 67.00 67.00
Large Patron Bucket 6.00 6.00
Cart Rates
18 Hole Power Cart 31.00 32.00
18 Hole Tournament Cart 31.00 32.00
18 Hole Patron Cart 25.00 26.00
9 Hole Tournament Cart 20.50 21.00
9 Hole Power Cart 20.50 21.00
9 Hole Par 3 Power Cart 16.00 16.00
9 Hole Par 3 Patron Cart 16.50 delete
Pull Cart/Regulation Course 5.00 5.00
Pull Cart/Par 3 Course 4.00 4.00
Trailer fee/Use of personal power cart 15.00/10.00 15.00/10.00
12
City of Golden Valley
2017 Proposed Master Fee Schedule-Exhibit A
2016 Adopted 2017 Proposed
Fee Fee
Brookview Golf Course Rates(continued)
Club Rentals
18 Hole full rental-Regulation 20.00/30.00 20.00/30.00
9 Hole full rental-Regulation 10.00/15.00 10.00/15.00
9 hole Par 3 half rental 10.00 10.00
Locker Rental
Season 20.00 20.00
Daily 1.00 1.00
Towel fee 2.00 2.00
Miscellaneous Fees
USGA Handicap Service
MGA Non-patron 40.00 40.00
Patron Annual 25.00 25.00
No Show Fee FULL FEE FULL FEE
Lessons
Adult Group 99.00 99.00
Junior Group 199.00 65.00
Lawn Bowling
League Fee M-Th evenings(7 week league) 350.00 350.00
Single Court Rental-resident and golf patron 20.00/hour 20.00/hour
Single Court Rental-non-resident 25.00/hour 25.00/hour
Private Rental of Four Courts 100.00/hour 100.00/hour
Private Rental of Eight Courts-exclusive use 200.00/hour 200.00/hour
Summer Kids Leagues 10.00-50.00 10.00-50.00
Senior Leagues 10.00-50.00 10.00-50.00
Rental of Green/4 courts for corporate golf outings 100.00/hour 100.00/hour
Deck Rental(0-4 hours) 100.00 125.00
Game Official For Private Rentals/Events 25.00/hour 25.00/hour
Game Equipment Use For Leagues&Rentals included included
Park&Recreation Fees
A non-resident fee is added to all Park and Recreation programs and rentals.
Resident status is live or work in the City of Golden Valley.
2016 Non-resident additional fee scale 2017 Non-resident additional fee scale
$1.00-25.00 $2.00 $5.00-$25.00 $2.00
$26.00-50.00 $3.00 $26.00-50.00 $3.00
$51.00-75.00 $4.00 $51.00-75.00 $4.00
$76.00+ $5.00 $76.00+ $5.00
Youth Fees
Baseball-Park 37.00 37.00
Basketball-Mites 45.00 45.00
Basketball-Youth 55.00 55.00
Bike Rangers 37.00 39.00
Chess Club 30.00 29.00
Drama Club(Summer) 63.00 63.00
Drama Club(Fall&Winter) 65.00 65.00
Explorers Hiking&Biking Club 35.00 35.00
Fishing Club 29.00
Football-Flag 33.00 29.00
Football/Basketball/Soccer Skills 33.00 39.00
Hockey-Rink Rat 48.00 48.00
Jewelry Making 34.00 Remove
Jump Rope 21.00 Remove
Kids Club 46.00 42.00
Kids Korner 33.00 35.00
Lawn Bowling 24.00
Pre-School Players 40.00 29.00
13
City of Golden Valley
2017 Proposed Master Fee Schedule-Exhibit A
2016 Adopted 2017 Proposed
Fee Fee
Park&Recreation Fees(continued)
A non-resident fee is added to all Park and Recreation programs and rentals.
Resident status is live or work in the City of Golden Valley.
2016 Non-resident additional fee scale 2017 Non-resident additional fee scale
$1.00-25.00 $2.00 $S.00-$2S.00 $2.00
$26.00-50.00 $3.00 $26.00-50.00 $3.00
$51.00-75.00 $4.00 $51.00-75.00 $4.00
$76.00+ $5.00 $76.00+ $5.00
Youth Fees-(continued)
Pitch by Coach 37.00 34.00
Playgrounds *New fee eliminates weekly craft fee,now included) 0.00-10.00 14.00
Preschool Playtime-per time 2.00 2.00
Preschool Playtime-10-time punch pass 15.00 15.00
Soccer-Fall 38.00 39.00
Soccer-Indoor 36.00 29.00
Tap&Ballet 42.00 42.00
T-Ball 37.00 35.00
Volleyball-Sand 32.00 29.00
Adult/Senior Activities
Adult Sports Cancelation Service Fee 40.00
Ballroom Dance-Swing&Social 55.00 55.00
Basketball-Open
Drop-in Fee 4.00 4.00
10-time Punch Pass 28.00 28.00
Belly Dancing 64.00-80.00 64.00-80.00
Soccer League-Co-Rec 550.00 550.00
Softball Leagues-Fall 415.00 430.00
Softball Leagues-Spring/Summer 815.00 815.00
Tae Kwan Do 70.00 70.00
Tai Chi 40.00-60.00 40.00-60.00
Volleyball-Open
Drop-in Fee 4.00 4.00
10-time Punch Pass 28.00 28.00
Volleyball League-Sand 250.00 250.00
Yoga&Pilates 55.00-95.00 55.00-95.00
Senior Programs
Bowling Tourney 5.00 Remove
Coffee Talk 2.00 2.00
Craft/Art Classes 6.50-70.00 6.50-70.00
Defensive Driving(refreshments only) 1.00 1.00
Living Well and Wise 1.00-4.00 1.00-4.00
Lunch Events 9.00-20.00 9.00-20.00
Membership Dues 5.00-8.00 5.00-8.00
Money Matters 1.00-3.00 1.00-3.00
Remember When 1.00-2.00 Remove
Special Events 4.00-20.00 4.00-20.00
Trips-Extended 2-6 Days 250.00-1200.00 250.00-1200.00
Trips-One Day 8.00-95.00 8.00-95.00
14
City of Golden Valley
2017 Proposed Master Fee Schedule-Exhibit A
2016 Adopted 2017 Proposed
Fee Fee
Park&Recreation Fees(continued)
A non-resident fee is added to all Park and Recreation programs and rentals.
Resident status is live or work in the City of Golden Valley.
Other Park&Recreation Fees
Picnic Shelter Damage Deposit 250.00
Small Park Shelter(up to 50 people)
Resident 100.00 100.00
Non-resident 115.00 115.00
Large Park Shelter(up to 100 people)
Resident 130.00 130.00
Non-resident 150.00 150.00
Entire Park Use--plus facility rental fees(up to 12 hours)
Resident 250.00
Non-resident 450.00
Brookview Gazebo(CenceFt/C,..,....,.niesiSeFyees)
(Available from 11:00 am-dusk and only in conjunction with Large Shelter
Rental for wedding ceremonies.)
Resident ^- 3OA
Nen resident 4 hour re.t^^+a' 4-59 99
Resident per hour 50.00
Non-resident per hour 75.00
Beer/Wine Permit(only with Picnic Shelter rental) 30.00 30.00
Party Equipment Use Fee Permit(inflatable,dunk tank,etc) Each 25.00
Brookview Community Center(Current Facility)
Deposit will be required at the time of booking
Social Event
Resident(over 75 people;12 hours; includes deck) 600.00 N/A
Non-resident(over 75 people;12 hours) includes deck) 690.00 N/A
Resident(75 or less people;5 hours max) per hour 35.00 35.00
Non-resident(75 or less people;5 hours max) per hour 45.00 45.00
Meeting
Private Industry or Commercial Use °„side..+ r,eR Rpsid,..+ $65 75 peF hauF
Resident per hour 35.00
Non-resident per hour 45.00
Non-Profit/Community Organization Resident/Ne., Rest yen cn 3
Resident per hour 0-20.00
Non-resident per hour 0-20.00
Brookview Community Center-Deck(0-4 hours)
Resident 125.00 125.00
Non-resident 150.00 150.00
Davis Community Center Gym
Resident per hour 25.00 25.00
Non-resident per hour 30.00 30.00
Sand Volleyball Court(per court)
Resident per hour 20.00 20.00
Non-resident per hour 35.00 35.00
Tennis or Pickleball Court
Tournament-per day/per court
Resident 40.00 40.00
Non-resident 50.00 50.00
Court/hr/wkday
Resident per hour 6.00 6.00
Non-resident per hour 8.00 8.00
15
City of Golden Valley
2017 Proposed Master Fee Schedule-Exhibit A
2016 Adopted 2017 Proposed
Fee Fee
Park&Recreation Fees(continued)
A non-resident fee is added to all Park and Recreation programs and rentals.
Resident status is live or work in the City of Golden Valley.
Other Park&Recreation Fees(continued)
Athletic Field
Resident per hour/per field 25.00 25.00
Non-resident per hour/per field 40.00 40.00
W/Lights
Resident per hour/per filed 40.00 40.00
Non-resident per hour/per filed 55.00 55.00
All day tournament
Resident per field 150.00 150.00
Non-resident per field 300.00 300.00
Field Attendant per hour 15.00 15.00
Professional Photo/Video Use of Specific Park Area(plus facility rental fees)
Resident per hour 100.00
Non-resident per hour 125.00
GemmeFdal Use of Park, (Fee does net
NeR Fesodent $125 peF heu*
Park Building
Resident per hour 35.00 35.00
Non-resident per hour 40.00 40.00
Hockey Rink
Resident per hour 25.00 25.00
Non-resident per hour 35.00 35.00
Youth Athletic Association
Maintenance Fee per player 7.00-15.00 7.00-15.00
Invitational Tournament per field per day 50.00 50.00
BACKYARD INDOOR PLAYGROUND
Daily Rates
Resident 4.00
Non-Resident 5.00
Socks 2.00
10 Punch Pass-Resident 30.00
10 Punch Pass-Non-Resident 40.00
Party Rates
Includes 2 hours party room and 10 indoor playground wristbands
-extra wristbands may be purchased for daily rate(max of 20 people
total per party room)
Resident 100.00
Non-Resident 120.00
Private Backyard Indoor Playground Rental
Includes 1 hours of exclusive use and 2 party rooms
Resident 250.00
Non-Resident 280.00
Additional hour 100.00
Group Rates
Pre-reservation required;Ratio of 10:1 youth/adult;1 payment only
Groups of 15 kids or more per child 4.50
Picnic Packages
Brookview Grill will provide food package options for party groups.
16
BROOKVIEW COMMUNITY CENTER (NEW)
DEPOSIT Deposit is due at time of booking to hold reservation.
$500 refundable damage deposit is due 2 weeks prior to rental.
All rentals include:Set-up / take-down and AV equipment
RESIDENT (Live or work in GV, book 24 months in advance for 14 hr, 12 months in advance for hourly)
Room Room Capacity Hours
Sweeney Lake Conference Rm
-12 max 2 hr min
North 50 – seated chairs only 2 hr min
South Waiting for #2 hr min
Both Waiting for #2 hr min
Twin Lake Rm
-4 No minimum
Fossil Creek Rm
-4 No minimum
Hideout -20 – seated at tables 2 hr min
Clubhouse -20 – seated at tables 2 hr min
Room Option Capacity Hours Mon-Thur Fri Sat Sun
Bassett Creek
212 (200 @ rounds, 12 head table)14 hr (10 am-12 am)-$900 $1,200 $700
Banquet Room
228 (216 @ rectangles, 12 head table)Hourly (2 hr min)$75/hr $80/hr $100/hr $75/hr
North 84 (72 at rounds & 12 at head table)Hourly (2 hr min)$55/hr $60/hr $80/hr $55/hr
South 72 (Classrm/presentation at rectangles)Hourly (2 hr min)$55/hr $60/hr $80/hr $55/hr
Lilac Room
-No minimum
Wirth Lake Rm
-Waiting for #2 hr min
Rice Lake Conference Rm
-12 max 2 hr min
Evergreen Deck
-104 – seated chairs only 2 hr min
204 – seated chairs only 2 hr min
Deck Event/Ceremony Fee
(set-up of chairs, equipment, basic PA)
NON-RESIDENT (Book 18 months in advance for 14 hr, 8 months in advance for hourly)
Room Option Capacity Hours
Sweeney Lake Conference Rm
-12 max 2 hr min
North 50 – seated chairs only 2 hr min
South Waiting for #2 hr min
Both Waiting for #2 hr min
Twin Lake Rm
-4 No minimum
Fossil Creek Rm
-4 No minimum
Hideout -20 – seated at tables 2 hr min
Clubhouse -20 – seated at tables 2 hr min
Room Option Capacity Hours Mon-
Thur--Fri Sat Sun
Bassett Creek
212 (200 @ rounds, 12 head table)14 hr (10 am-12 am)-$1,100 $1,400 $900
Banquet Room
228 (216 @ rectangles, 12 head table)Hourly (2 hr min)$90/hr $95/hr $115/hr $90/hr
North 84 (72 at rounds & 12 at head table)Hourly (2 hr min)$70/hr $75/hr $95/hr $70/hr
South 72 (Classrm/presentation at rectangles)Hourly (2 hr min)$70/hr $75/hr $95/hr $70/hr
Lilac Room
-No minimum
Wirth Lake Rm
-Waiting for #2 hr min
Rice Lake Conference Rm
-12 max 2 hr min
Evergreen Deck
-104 – seated chairs only 2 hr min
204 – seated chairs only 2 hr min
Deck Event/Ceremony Fee
(set-up of chairs, equipment, basic PA)
14 hour rental includes:Bassett Creek Banquet Room, Lilac room, catering kitchen, private (Fairway) deck.
$15/hr
$60/hr
$35/hr
$45/hr
Fairway Deck
-
$45/hr
-$220
Full Rm
Lower Level
Mon-Sun
$35/hr
Valley Room
$60/hr
$60/hr
$90/hr
$15/hr
$15/hr
$35/hr
$35/hr
Upper Level
$15/hr
$50/hr
$25/hr
$35/hr
Fairway Deck
-
$35/hr
-$200
Full Rm
Lower Level
Mon-Sun
$25/hr
Valley Room
$50/hr
$50/hr
$80/hr
$15/hr
$15/hr
$25/hr
$25/hr
Upper Level
1
AGENDA
Regular Meeting of the
City Council
Golden Valley City Hall
7800 Golden Valley Road
Council Chamber
December 6, 2016
6:30 pm
1. CALL TO ORDER PAGES
A. Pledge of Allegiance
B. Roll Call
C. Receipt of Human Services Fund 2017 Allocation Report
D. Presentation of Bill Hobbs Human Rights Award
2. ADDITIONS AND CORRECTIONS TO AGENDA
3. CONSENT AGENDA
Approval of Consent Agenda - All items listed under this heading are considered to be
routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no discussion
of these items unless a Council Member so requests in which event the item will be
removed from the general order of business and considered in its normal sequence on
the agenda.
A. Approval of Minutes - City Council Meeting November 15, 2016
B. Approval of City Check Register
C. Licenses
D. Minutes of Boards and Commissions:
E. Bids and Quotes
F. Second Consideration - Resolution for Master Fee Schedule
G. Adoption of 2017-2018 Budget for Enterprise, Special Revenue and Internal Services
Funds 16-
H. Approval of 2017-2021 Capital Improvement Program 16-
I. Receipt of October 2016 Financial Reports
4. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Public Hearing - Adoption of 2016 Property Tax Levy Payable 2017 and 2017 -2018
General Fund Budget
B. Public Hearing - Conditional Use Permit - Morrie’s 700 Colorado Ave S
5. OLD BUSINESS
6. NEW BUSINESS
A. Second Consideration - Sewer Access Charge (SAC) and Water Access Charge (WAC)
B. Approve 55 West Project Feasibility Report, Call for Improvement Hearing and
Assessment Hearing
C. Announcement of Meetings
1. Future Draft Agendas: Council/Manager December 13, 2016 and City Council
December 20, 2016 and January 2017
D. Mayor and Council Communications
7. ADJOURNMENT
A G E N D A
Council/Manager Meeting
Golden Valley City Hall
7800 Golden Valley Road
Council Conference Room
December 13, 2016
6:30 pm
Pages
1. Update from Loppet and Minneapolis Park Board Regarding Cross Country Ski
Trail and Dog Park (30 minutes)
2. Golden Valley Community Foundation (30 minutes)
3. Comprehensive Plan Update (20 minutes)
Council/Manager meetings have an informal, discussion-style format and are designed
for the Council to obtain background information, consider policy alternatives, and
provide general directions to staff. No formal actions are taken at these meetings. The
public is invited to attend Council/Manager meetings and listen to the discussion; public
participation is allowed by invitation of the City Council.
AGENDA
Regular Meeting of the
City Council
Golden Valley City Hall
7800 Golden Valley Road
Council Chamber
December 20, 2016
6:30 pm
1. CALL TO ORDER PAGES
A. Pledge of Allegiance
B. Roll Call
2. ADDITIONS AND CORRECTIONS TO AGENDA
3. CONSENT AGENDA
Approval of Consent Agenda - All items listed under this heading are considered to be
routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no
discussion of these items unless a Council Member so requests in which event the item
will be removed from the general order of business and considered in its normal
sequence on the agenda.
A. Approval of Minutes - City Council Meeting December 6, 2016
B. Approval of City Check Register
C. Licenses:
1. General License - Tobacco
2. City Gambling Licenses
D. Minutes of Boards and Commissions:
1.
E. Bids and Quotes:
F. Acceptance of Donations for Ongoing Programs and Other Miscellaneous Donations
G. 55 West Public Improvement Project Call for Public Hearings - Assessment and
Improvement
H. Approval of 2017 general Wages and Salaries
I. Engagement Letter – Auditing Services for the 2016 Year
4. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A.
5. OLD BUSINESS
6. NEW BUSINESS
A. Adopt 2017 Legislative Goals
B. Approve Memo of Understanding with the Golden Valley Community Foundation
C. 2017 Council Meeting Calendar
D. Announcement of Meetings
1. Future Draft Agendas: January 2017
E. Mayor and Council Communications
7. ADJOURNMENT