The URL can be used to link to this page

09-16-14 CC Agenda Packet (entire) AGENDA Regular Meeting of the City Council Golden Valley City Hall 7800 Golden Valley Road Council Chamber September 16, 2014 6:30 pm The Council may consider item numbers 1, 2, 3, 5 and 6 prior to the public hearings scheduled at 7 pm 1. CALL TO ORDER PAGES A. Roll Call B. Pledge of Allegiance C. Presentation of Awards - 2014 Photo Contest 3-4 2. ADDITIONS AND CORRECTIONS TO AGENDA 3. CONSENT AGENDA Approval of Consent Agenda - All items listed under this heading are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no discussion of these items unless a Council Member or citizen so requests in which event the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda. A. Approval of Minutes 1. City Council Meeting August 19, 2014 5-12 2. City Council Meeting September 2, 2014 13-19 B. Approval of City Check Register 20 C. Licenses: 1. Gambling License Exemption and Waiver of Notice Requirement - Good 21-23 Shepherd Church D. Minutes of Boards and Commissions: 1. Planning Commission - July 28, 2014 24-33 2. Human Services Fund- July 7, 2014 34-35 E. Authorization to Sign Legal Services Agreement with Chestnut & Cambronne, P.A. for Prosecutor Contract 36-46 F. Adopt Resolution for Joint Powers Agreement with City of Minneapolis to Establish 47-50 Responsibilities for Sale of Water and Sewer Services within Golden Valley 14-72 G. Approval of Conditional Extension for Filing of Plat and Submitting Final PUD Plan 51-54 Application - PUD #107 - The Towers at West End - Southwest Quadrant of 1-394 and Highway 100 - Duke Realty, Applicant H. Receipt of August 2014 Financial Reports 55-63 I. Adopt Resolution for Approval of Plat - Golden Valley Homes 14-73 64-66 J. Adopt Resolution Acceptance of Grant and Donation - Park and Recreation 14-74 67-68 K. Board/Commission Appointments L. Receive and file correspondence regarding 6A - Ordinance #530 Six Month Moratorium 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS 7 PM A. Public Hearing - Ordinance #528 - Approval of Conditional Use Permit#137, 69-87 601 Boone Avenue North, TruStone Financial, Applicant B. Public Hearing - Ordinance #529 - Final PUD Plan No. 95, Amendment 3 - 9191 and 88-123 9393 Wayzata Blvd - Twin Cities Automotive DBA Golden Valley TCA P., LLC, Applicant C. Public Hearing - Preliminary PUD Plan No. 118 - 9130 and 9220 Olson Memorial 124-160 Highway - Golden Villas, LLC, Applicant D. Public Hearing - Revision to Preliminary Plat - Kate's Woods - 221 Sunnyridge Lane - 161-177 David Knaeble, Applicant E. Continued Public Hearing - Ordinance #527 - Amendments to the Zoning Map - 178-179 305 and 345 Pennsylvania Avenue South - Lake West Development, LLC, Applicant F. Continued Public Hearing - Preliminary PUD Plan for Laurel Ponds PUD No. 117 - 180-192 305 and 345 Pennsylvania Avenue South - Lake West Development, LLC, Applicant 5. OLD BUSINESS 6. NEW BUSINESS A. Ordinance #530, Imposing a Six Month Moratorium on Subdivisions and Planned Unit 193-194 Developments that include Single Family Residential Components B. Bottineau Update 195 C. Authorization to Sign First Amendment to Addendum to Purchase Agreement with 196-199 The Investor Group, LLC for 2241 Legend Drive D. Announcements of Meetings E. Mayor and Council Communications 7. ADJOURNMENT *Items added at the Council Meeting CZ��` U� � �`. , CityAdministration/Council 763-593-8003/763-593-81 Q9(fax) � � a��^rr.. .. �-�� . Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting September 16, 2014 Agenda Item 1. C. Presentation of Awards - 2014 Photo Contest Prepared By Cheryl Weiler, Communications Manager Summary Golden Valley's 22nd annual Views of the Valley photo contest drew 59 entries from residents who tried to capture on film their version of the city's beauty, uniqueness, and quality of life. The "Natural Golden Valley" category featured photos of landscapes, flora, fauna, etc. The "Golden Valley Lifestyle" category featured photos of cityscapes, buildings, people, and activities. The "Enhanced" category featured photos significantly altered by editing software. Following these standards as well as the basics of good photography, four judges chose the following entries as winners. All winners receive certificates of recognition and publication of their photos in various City public information pieces. Top winners in each category also receive a cash prize. Enhanced Golden Valley � First Place ($50): "Tribute To The Fallen," a photo of the red, white, and blue American flag in the foreground of a black-and-white scene, by Alyssa Euteneuer. Golden Valley Lifestyle � Honorable Mention: "From The Rooftops," a shot of the Golden Valley water tower and cityscape against a dramatic evening sky, by Andrew Fitzsimmons. � First Place ($50): "Joy," showing a dancer silhouetted by sun and sky, by Sonia Mohammadzadah. Natural Golden Valley � Honorable Mention: "Let's Shake On It," a close-up of a dragonfly, by Jeff Lamberg. � First Place ($50) and Overall Grand Prize ($50): "Looking For A Strike," an extreme close-up of a dragonfly with a dew-drop bowling ball, by Jeff Lamberg. People's Choice "Glare," a close-up of an owl, by Jacob Condon. This $25 prize is awarded to the winner in public ballot box and online voting. Views of the Valley aims to promote Golden Valley and civic pride. Judges for 2014 were Ann Gallagher, Cable 12 TV; Sarah Larson, West Metro Fire-Chief and former photography pro; Emilie Kastner, City of Plymouth communications coordinator; and Dennis Zerwas, Jr, professional photographer. Next year's contest deadline will be June 12, 2015. Recommended Action Display winning photos and present certificates and cash prizes to winners. _'�� , ' �ry w �°��`� UNOFFICIAL MINUTES � ` �� ,�� CITY COUNCIL MEETING ��{ GOLDEN VALLEY, MINNESOTA AUGUST 19, 2014 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Harris called the meeting to order at 6:30 pm. 1A. Roll Call Present: Mayor Harris, Council Members Fonnest, Clausen, Schmidgall and Snope. 1 B. Pledge of Allegiance 1C. Proclamation for Hunger Action Month Ms. Carla Johnson, Executive Director Northwest Hennepin Human Services Council, reviewed the programs and services they offer. The City Council thanked the Human Services Council and their staff for the presentation and continued hard work. 2. ADDITIONS AND CORRECTIONS TO AGENDA MOTION made by Council Member Snope, seconded by Council Member Glausen to approve the agenda of August 19, 2014, as submitted and the motion carried unanimously. 3. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA MOTION made by Council Member Snope, seconded by Council Member Schmidgall to approve the consent agenda of August 19, 2014, as revised to remove items: 3E-Award 2014 Winnetka Avenue Streetscape Paver Rehabilitation Project, and 3F-Letters, Emails and/or Petitions and the motion carried unanimously. 3A1. Approve of the Minutes of City Council Meeting - July 15, 2014. 3A2. Approve of the Minutes of Special City Council Meeting - August 5, 2014. 3B1. Approve City Check Register and authorize the payments of the bills as submitted. 3B2. Approve Housing and Redevelopment Authority Check Register and authorize the payments of the bills as submitted. � 3C1. Approve Gambling License Exemption and Waiver of Notice Requirement - Saint Therese Foundation. 3C2. Approve Gambling License Application to Conduct Excluded Bingo - Ladies Auxiliary to the Veterans of Foreign Wars Post #7051. 3C3. Approve General Business License. 3D. Accept for filing the Minutes of Boards and Commissions as follows: 1. Planning Commission - June 23, 2014 2. Open Space and Recreation Commission - April 28, 2014 3. Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission - June 19, 2014 �E. Rc�l� �.,r� ni�„+o�, 0 Unofficial City Council Minutes -2- August 19, 2014 3. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA-Continued 3G Adopt Resolution 14-68 Approval of Plat - Tennant Companies PUD No. 114 & Authorization to Sign PUD Permit & PUD Development Agreement - Tennant Company PUD No. 114. 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA 3E. Award Contract for 2014 Winnetka Avenue Streetscape Paver Walk Rehabilitation Project No. 13-19 Resolution 14-67 City Engineer Oliver presented the staff report and answered questions from the Council. MOTION made by Council Member Fonnest, seconded by Council Member Snope and the motion carried unanimously to: 1. Award contract for 2014 Winnetka Avenue Paver Walk Rehabilitation Project to the lowest responsible bidder, Biackstone Contractors, LLC for the Base Bid and alternate bids 2 and 3, in the amount of $521,829.45. 2. Approve Resolution 14-67 authorizing the Cooperative Agreement with Hennepin County for ADA Compliant Pedestrian Ramp Construction as part of the Winnetka Avenue Streetscape Paver Rehabilitation Project. 3. Authorize the Hennepin County Cooperative Agreement No. PW 27-13-14 for Pedestrian Ramp funds. 3F. Accept for filing an email from Jason Boudreau-Landis regarding resignation from Planning Commission and an email from Brian Cook regarding resignation from Human Rights Commission. The Council expressed their appreciation and thanked the Commissioners. MOTION made by Council Member Fonnest, seconded by Council Member Snope to receive and file the resignations. 4. PUBLIC HEARING 4A. Public Hearing - Preliminary PUD Plan for Marie's Woods PUD No. 116 - 7200 and 7218 Harold Avenue - Peter Knaeble, Applicant Planning Manager Zimmerman presented the staff report and answered questions from the Council. City Manager Burt answered questions from the Council. City Attorney Schelzel answered questions from the Council. Mr. Knaeble, applicant, reviewed the application and answered questions from the Council. Mayor Harris opened the public hearing. Mr. Larry Kueny, 7303 Ridgeway Road, stated Mr. Knaeble has bent over backwards for their neighborhood, he said the neighbors feel Mr. Knaeble's plan is the best possible solution for their area and added the proposed cul-de-sac would only be a half cul-de-sac, because the neighbors on the left side do not intend to sell their property, and the homes on the right of it would be looking into the property's backyard. He added if a cul-de-sac was proposed between the lots and the homes were built around it, that it could be a different possibility. He stated he and his wife support Mr. Knaeble's plan. Unofficial City Council Minutes -3- August 19, 2014 4A. Public Hearing - Preliminary PUD Plan for Marie's Woods - continued Mr. Perry Thom, 320 Louisiana Ave, stated his home is relatively new in the neighborhood. When he was in the process of building it, the builder at the time informed him there would not be variations to easements and property builds in his area. He said at one time a developer proposed to build townhomes on his and the neighbor's lot, but the City said no because the City was very specific as to not allow heavy density in his neighborhood which kept the lots with single family homes. He added he is against the cul-de-sac plan and would prefer to see two single family homes, but he would support Mr. Knaeble's plan for six homes. He added he felt there would be fewer trees lost, less density, less encroachment on smaller properties and would not lower the value of their homes. He said a couple of ineetings regarding this lot process were held, and no one outside of the Planning Commission supported the cul-de-sac plan. Mayor Harris closed the public hearing. There was much Council discussion regarding the proposed Preliminary PUD plan for Marie's Woods located at 7200 and 7218 Harold Avenue. MOTION made by Mayor Harris, seconded by Council Member Schmidgall to direct staff to take the findings and turn the negatives into positives, add a condition for sprinklers in the homes on the back lots, and a shared maintenance agreement for the driveways, upon a vote being taken, the following voted in favor thereof: Harris and Schmidgall and the following voted against: Snope, Fonnest, and Clausen and the motion failed. MOTION made by Council Member Snope, seconded by Council Member Fonnest to deny the Preliminary Plan for Marie's Woods PUD No. 116 with the following findings upon a vote being taken, the following voted in favor thereof: Fonnest, Snope, and Clausen and the following voted against: Harris and Schmidgall, and the motion carried. The Council makes the following findings pursuant to City Code Section 11.55, Subd. 5(E): 1. The PUD plan is tailored to the specific characteristics of the site but does not achieve a higher quality of site planning and design than generally expected under conventional provisions of the ordinance. 2. The PUD plan preserves and protects substantial desirable portions of the site's characteristics, open space and sensitive environmental features including steep slopes, trees, scenic views, creeks, wetlands and open waters. 3. The PUD plan does not include efficient and effective use (which includes preservation) of the land. 4. The PUD plan does not result in development compatible with adjacent uses and is not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and redevelopment plans and goals. 5. The PUD plan is not consistent with preserving and improving the general health, safety and general welfare of the people of the City. 6. The PUD plan does not meet the PUD Intent and Purpose provision and all other PUD ordinance provisions. 4B. Public Hearing - Preliminary Plat Approval - Paisley Lane Woods - 221 Paisley Lane Planning Manager Zimmerman presented the staff report and answered questions from the Council. City Engineer Oliver answered questions from the Council. City Attorney Schelzel answered questions from the Council. Unofficial City Council Minutes -4- August 19, 2014 4B. Public Hearing - Preliminary Plat Approval - Paisley Lane Woods - continued Mr. Pavek, Civil Site Group, engineer on the project presented background information on the application and answered questions from the Council. Mr. Kuperus, the builder on the project, answered questions from the Council. Mayor Harris opened the public hearing. Ms. Diane Richards, 217 Paisley Lane, stated she lives in the property east of the proposed development. She indicated the neighborhood has had several meetings regarding the plans and she was attending on behalf of her neighbors who were unable to. She presented a map of what the neighborhood currently looks like, gave a brief historical review, and added it is referred to as the "Tralee Neighborhood." She said the neighbors have reviewed the City's Comprehensive Plan and felt the City should uphold the standards of development that foster urban style and suburban tranquility. She added that the neighbors would like to preserve the integrity of their neighborhood and with this proposal there would be a total of six new homes in their area. She said the homes include the two already built, the two approved earlier, and the two proposed tonight which represents 17% of the houses in their neighborhood. She presented a map of the current homes and said each one has a large, wooded lot, set back from the street with a mostly mid-century design. She then presented a drawing with houses similar in style and design of those being built by LDK Builders. She said the garage is the prominent feature, there are fewer trees, a different house color palette and they are set closer to the street. She presented a view of what the area would resemble with the new homes, and added that they would not blend into the current style of the neighborhood. She said the neighbors are watching what is happening with lots in their area because as current residents move out their lots may be subdivided. She inquired as to when the City will stop subdividing lots. She asked if the Comprehensive Plan would maintain the integrity and preserve the quiet, peacefulness of neighborhoods. Mr. Jerry Kassanchuk, 235 Paisley Lane, stated he reviewed the definition of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority which in part states its function is to increase the City's taxable valuation. He said at a meeting with the developer, when asked why build two homes instead of one, the builder's response was they would not make as much money because it costs more to build just one house. He said that spoke to other architects regarding this answer and they felt there was no merit to the profitably of just one house being built and the only explanation would be the builder was using stock plans. He stated the home currently on the property has a flat roof and the two proposed homes would have slanted roofs, he felt this could cause run-off problems for the homes located in the back lots. He stated under the Comprehensive Plan section regarding land use and minimized conflicts, it states traditional neighborhoods should be protected and respected. He said part of the definition of traditional is long standing, and of neighborhoods it is a community within a town, or city, and he believes his neighborhood is a traditional one. He said where the two new houses were built, a swamp was created with many trees falling into it and the developer has not done anything to take care of this. He added he would not want to live with a swamp in his backyard and asked who will pay for the fallen trees. He stated he felt that the good of Golden Valley could be served with only one house being built. Mr. Brian Walvatne, 227 Paisley Lane, said he lives across the street from the proposed development and he signed the resident's petition submitted from the neighborhood. He asked to stop the building of cookie cutter track houses in his neighborhood. He said the residents have not changed their minds and accepted this plan and are saying no to LDK- type houses in their neighborhood. Unofficial City Council Minutes -5- August 19, 2014 4B. Public Hearing - Preliminary Plat Approval - Paisley Lane Woods - continued Mr. John Rode, 205 Paisley Lane, stated he lives directly behind the proposed development. He said there is a big hill in the neighborhood and he feels it will create a big mess with storm drainage. He said that adding more than one house to a lot is not right, and added that there is a lot of unanswered question regarding this issue. Mayor Harris closed the public hearing. There was much Council discussion regarding the Proposed Preliminary Plat for Paisley Lane Woods located at 221 Paisley Lane. MOTION made by Council Member Schmidgall, seconded by Council Member Snope to approve the Preliminary Plat for Paisley Lane Woods, 221 Paisley Lane, subject to the following conditions upon a vote being taken, the following voted in favor thereof: Fonnest, Snope, and Schmidgall and the following voted against: Harris and Clausen, and the motion carried. 1. The City Attorney will determine if a title review is necessary prior to approval of the final plat. 2. A park dedication fee of$1,540 shall be paid before final plat approval. 3. The City Engineer's memorandum, dated July 7, 2014, shall become part of this approval. 4. All applicable City permits shall be obtained prior to the development of the new lots. 4C. Public Hearing - Ordinance #519 - Rezoning from Single Family Residential Zoning District (R-1) to Moderate Density Residential Zoning District (R-2) - 1001 Lilac Drive North - Max Zelayaran, Applicant Planning Manager Zimmerman presented the staff report and answered questions for the Council. Mr. Zelayaran, applicant, answered questions from the Council. Mayor Harris opened the public hearing. No one came forward. Mayor Harris the closed public hearing. MOTION made by Council Member Schmidgall, seconded by Council Member Snope to adopt Ordinance No. 519, Rezoning from Single Family Residential Zoning District (R-1) to Moderate Density Residential Zoning District (R-2), 1001 Lilac Drive North, Max Zelayaran, and the motion carried unanimously. Mr. Michael Garnet, 5554 Lindsey Street, arrived after the motion was made. He stated that the neighborhood is upset because they did not get notice of the public hearing bring held tonight. He said he thought that the neighborhood would get another notice on the public hearing. 4D. Public Hearing - Preliminary Plat Approval - Golden Valley Homes - 1001 Lilac Drive North Planning Manager Zimmerman presented the staff report and answered questions for the Council. Unofficial City Council Minutes -6- August 19, 2014 4D. Public Hearing - Preliminary Plat Approval - Golden Valley Homes - continued Mayor Harris opened the public hearing. No one came forward. Mayor Harris closed the public hearing. There was Council discussion regarding the preliminary plat for Golden Valley Homes located at 1001 Lilac Drive North. MOTION made by Council Member Snope, seconded by Council Member Clausen to approve the Preliminary Plat for Golden Valley Homes, 1001 Lilac Drive North, subject to the following conditions and the motion carried unanimously. 1. The City Attorney will determine if a title review is necessary prior to approval of the final plat. 2. The "Declaration of Covenants, Restrictions, and Conditions" shall be approved by the City Attorney prior to the issuance of any building permits. 3. A park dedication fee of $1,600 shall be paid prior to approval of the Final Plat. 4. The City Engineer's memorandum, dated June 2, 2014, shall become part of this approval. 5. A Subdivision Development Agreement may be required. 6. All applicable City permits shall be obtained prior to the development of the new lots. Further, the City Council approves a waiver from Section 12:20, Subd. 5(B) of City Code, finding that: • The proposed Lot 2 would measure 116.43 feet in width along the east front setback line. • A required 5 foot right-of-way dedication would reduce that width to 111.43 feet. • Section 12.20, Subdivision 5(B) of City Code requires that corner lots in the R-2 zoning district measure at least 120 feet in width along the front setback lines. • Reducing the corner lot width requirement by 8.57 feet allows for the construction of a twin home which is consistent with other uses in the area and would not be detrimental to the public welfare. 4E. Public Hearing - Preliminary Plat Approval - Fretham Twenty-Two - 4XXX Harold Avenue Planning Manager Zimmerman presented the staff report and answered questions from the Council. Mayor Harris opened the public hearing. No one came forward. Mayor Harris closed the public hearing. MOTION made by Council Member Schmidgall, seconded by Council Member Snope to approve the Preliminary Plat for Fretham Twenty-Two, 4XXX Harold Avenue, subject to the following conditions and the motion carried unanimously. 1. The City Attorney will determine if a title review is necessary prior to approval of the final plat. 2. The City Engineer's memorandum, dated July 7, 2014, shall become part of this approval. 3. All applicable City permits shall be obtained prior to the development of the new lots. 4F. Public Hearing - Amendments to the General Land Use Plan Map - 305 and 345 Pennsylvania Avenue South - Lake West Development, LLC, Applicant Planning Manager Zimmerman presented the staff report and stated public hearing items 4F, 4G, and 4H will be combined in this discussion, but voted on individually and answered questions from the Council. City Engineer Oliver answered questions from the Council. Unofficial City Council Minutes -7- August 19, 2014 4F. Public Hearing - Amendments to the General Land Use Plan Map - continued Mr. Don Jensen, applicant, Lake West Development, LLC, outlined the application plans and answered questions from the Council. Mayor Harris opened the public hearing. Ms. Anne Devitt, 235 Pennsylvania Avenue, stated she is concerned about the traffic on Pennsylvania Avenue. She said few people stop at the four way stop sign at Laurel and Pennsylvania and that the intersection ice collects, and people have problems getting up the hill. She said she is also concerned about parking in the area. She said she is against the sidewalk being built in front of her house because it would take a big part of her yard. She said her street had recently had curb and gutter work done, and if the sidewalk was a priority why it was not address at that time. Mr. Mark Friederichs, 7501 Western Avenue, stated he is concerned about changing the character of his neighborhood. He stated he is concerned about parking. He felt this area would be a good location for 10 new home, not 30 homes. He said one of the City's wealth is low density, and asked why the wealth needs to be spent. He asked that the Council not sell them out. Mr. Adam Hiler, 305 Pennsylvania Avenue, stated he was for the proposed plan because one of the lots involved was his. He felt this plan would be the best of the worst of what the neighborhood has seen. Ms. Delores Jensen, 150 Oregon Avenue, stated she thinks the houses being built are similar to her grandson playing with Legos. She stated she is concerned by the impact of cutting down the hill and does not think it will be pretty. Mayor Harris closed the public hearing. MOTION made by Council Member Schmidgall, seconded by Council Member Fonnest to adopt Resolution 14-69 for Amendment to the General Land Use Plan Map for 305 and 345 Pennsylvania Avenue South and the motion carried unanimously. 4G. Public Hearing - Ordinance No. 527 - Amendments to the Zoning Map - 305 and 345 Pennsylvania Avenue South - Lake West Development, LLC, Applicant Planning Manager Zimmerman answered questions from the Council. City Manager Burt answered questions from the Council. Mr. Jensen, applicant, answered questions from the Council. Mr. Fretham answered questions from the Council. There was Council discussion regarding the amendments to the Zoning Map in regards to 305 and 345 Pennsylvania Avenue South. MOTION made by Council Member Fonnest, seconded by Council Member Snope to table the Ordinance amendments to the Zoning Map for 305 and 345 Pennsylvania Avenue South until the September 2, 2014, City Council meeting and the motion carried unanimously. Unofficial City Council Minutes -8- August 19, 2014 4H. Public Hearing - Preliminary PUD Plan for Laurel Ponds PUD No. 117 - 305 and 345 Pennsylvania Avenue South - Lake West Development, LLC, Applicant MOTION made by Council Member Fonnest, seconded by Council Member Snope to table the Preliminary PUD Plan for Laurel Ponds PUD No. 117 located at 305 and 345 Pennsylvania Avenue South to the September 2, 2014, City Council meeting and the motion carried unanimously. 6. NEW BUSINESS 6A. Bottineau Transitway Update Planning Manager Zimmerman presented the staff report and answered questions from the Council. MOTION made by Council Member Snope, seconded by Council Member Clausen to receive and file the Bottineau Transitway Update and the motion carried unanimously. 6B. Announcements of Meetings. The Battle of the Badges Community Blood Drive will be held on August 20, 2014, from 1 to 5 pm at Public Safety Building. The next Council/Manager Meeting will be held on August 21, 2014, at 6:30 pm in the Council Conference Room. The Golden Valley Rotary Club fundraiser for PRISM will be held on August 23, 2014, at 6 pm at Brookview Park. A Neighborhood Meeting for the 200 Meadow Lane Subdivision will be held on August 27, 2014, at 7 pm at the Golden Valley Library. The City Offices will be closed on September 1, 2014, in observance of Labor Day. The next City Council Meeting will be held on September 2, 2014, at 6:30 pm. 6C. Mayor and Council Communications. The Council thanked staff for organizing the grand opening event of lawn bowling at the Brookview Golf Course. 7. Adjournment MOTION made by Council Member Snope, seconded by Council Member Fonnest and the motion carried unanimously to adjourn the meeting at 10:38 pm. Shepard Harris, Mayor ATTEST: Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk #'�'�� ,��, UNOFFICIAL MINUTES = �� fi �� CITY COUNCIL MEETING � = � � �� GOLDEN VALLEY, MINNESOTA � �� . September 2, 2014 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Harris called the meeting to order at 6:30 pm. 1A. Roll Call Present: Mayor Harris, Council Members Fonnest, Clausen, Schmidgall and Snope. 1 B. Pledge of Allegiance 2. ADDITIONS AND CORRECTIONS TO AGENDA MOTION made by Council Member Fonnest, seconded by Council Member Schmidgall to approve the agenda of September 2, 2014, as revised: Amendment to 3M-Approve one-year extension for 1315 Angelo Drive to change extension date to 2015 and addition of 3N- Receive and file application for Minor Subdivision for Hanson Wood Shores and the motion carried unanimously. 3. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA MOTION made by Council Member Snope, seconded by Council Member Schmidgall to approve the consent agenda of September 2, 2014, as revised to amend item: 3M-Approve one-year extension for 1315 Angelo Drive, addition of 3N-Receive and file application and removal of 3F-Award 2014 Winnetka Avenue Streetscape Paver Rehabilitation Project, and 3F-Letter, Emails and/or Petitions and the motion carried unanimously. 3A1. Approve the Minutes of City Council Meeting - August 6, 2014. 3A2. Approve the Minutes of Special Council/Manager Meeting - August 6, 2014. 3B1. Approve City Check Register and authorize the payments of the bills as submitted. 3B2. Approve Housing and Redevelopment Authority Check Register and authorize the payments of the bills as submitted. 3C1. Approve Solicitor's License for NARAL Pro-Choice Minnesota. 3C2. Approve General Business License. 3C3. Approve Temporary On-Sale Malt Liquor Special Event Permit - Hire A Host/Rudolph's BBQ Catering for Golden Valley Days Art & Music Festival. 3D. Accept for filing the Minutes of Boards and Commissions as follows: 1. Planning Commission - July 14, 2014 2. Open Space and Recreation Commission - June 30, 2014 3E. Bids and Quotes: Award contract to Flag Builders of Minnesota, Inc. in the amount of $112,450 for the 2014 Hampshire Park Shelter Roof Replacement Project. , 3H. Approve Requests for beer and/or wine at Brookview Park as recommended by staff. 31. To call for public hearing for certification of special assessments for October 7, 2014. 3J. To set the date of the Truth-in-Taxation public hearing for Tuesday, December 2, 2014 at 7 pm. Unofficial City Council Minutes -2- September 2, 2014 3. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA-Continued 3K. To receive and file the Juty 2014 Financial Reports. 3L. Adopt Resolution 14-70 for Approval of Plat - Fretham Twenty-Five. 3M. Approve a one-year extension for approved Zoning Code Variances for 1315 Angelo Drive to November 3, 2015. 3. ITEM ADDED TO THE CONSENT AGENDA 3N. To Receive and file a Letter regarding Application for Minor Subdivision for Hanson Wood Shores. 3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA 3F. Schaper Pond Diversion Project a. Authorize Cooperative Agreement with the Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission. b. Authorize Professional Engineering Services with Barr Engineering Company. City Engineer Oliver presented the staff report and answered questions from the Council. MOTION made by Council Member Snope, seconded by Council Member Clausen to approve the Cooperative Agreement for the design and construction of water quality improvements at Schaper Park and the motion carried unanimously. MOTION made by Council Member Fonnest, seconded by Council Member Schmidgall to authorize entering into an agreement with Barr Engineering Company for the design and construction coordination of the Schaper Park Improvements in an amount not to exceed $142,400 and the motion carried unanimously. 3G Authorize the Mayor, City Manager and Police Chief to sign the amended Community Service Officer Agreement with Breck School for 2014-2015. Mayor Harris stated a typo was found in the contract which should read forty instead of forth. MOTION made by Mayor Harris, seconded by Council Member Fonnest to authorize the Mayor, City Manager and Police Chief to sign the amended Community Service Officer Agreement with Breck School for 2014-2015 and the motion carried unanimously. 4. PUBUC HEAR/NG 4A. Continued Public Hearing - Ordinance No. 527 - Amendments to the Zoning Map for 305 and 345 Pennsylvania Avenue South - Lake West Development, LLC, Applicant Planning Manager Zimmerman presented the staff report and stated public hearing items 4A and 4B will be combined in this discussion, but voted on individually. He answered questions from the Council. City Manager Burt answered questions from the Council. City Attorney Barnard answered questions from the Council. MOTION made by Council Member Snope, seconded by Council Member Clausen to table Ordinance No. 527, Rezoning 305 and 345 Pennsylvania Avenue South, to the City Council meeting of September 16, 2014, upon a vote being taken, the following voted in favor: Harris, Snope, Clausen and Fonnest and the following voted against: Schmidgall and the motion carried. Unofficial City Council Minutes -3- September 2, 2014 4B. Continued Public Hearing - Preliminary PUD Plan for Laurel Ponds PUD No. 117 for 305 and 345 Pennsylvania Avenue South - Lake West Development, LLC, Applicant MOTION made by Council Member Snope, seconded by Council Member Clausen to table the Preliminary Plan for Laurel Ponds PUD No. 117 to the City Council meeting of September 16, 2014, upon a vote being taken, the following voted in favor: Harris, Snope, Clausen and Fonnest and the following voted against: Schmidgall and the motion carried. 4C. Public Hearing - Preliminary Plat Approval - Hanson Wood Shores -Wessin Property Planning Manager Zimmerman presented the staff report and answered questions for the Council. City Manager Burt answered questions from the Council. City Attorney Barnard answered questions from the Council. Mayor Harris opened the public hearing. Ms. Jacqueline Day, 1334 Spring Valley Road, said she lives on Sweeny Lake and was there to represent the applicants, Mr. and Mrs. Wessin. She stated she had two important points to make regarding the application. She stated the first point was Mr. Wessin has a plan for his parcels which does not require a new street to be built and added his plan answers all of the future development questions in a legal and environmentally friendly manner. She said the second point is, the City does not have a right to prevent the proposal from happening and added city staff should not have their own plan for his land. She reviewed the description of the property and reviewed the history. She said Mr. Wessin realized if he were to develop the land, there are only two ways to make it work, the first being to sell it to a big developer with deep pockets who would shoot for maximum density, or to approve the application being presented with only two new homes on it. Any other plan, she added including what the City is offering, would not work. She said recently Mr. Wessin has reviewed plans from different developers, who felt they could redevelop the property in an environmentally friendly way with medium density, but after reviewing the costs associated with it, their plans changed to maximum density, or they decided not develop it. She said she felt city staff is ignoring the cost of developing the land that would work best financially and environmentally and explained the process Mr. Wessin used to develop his plan. She provided pictures and gave an overview of each of the owners and their property in the area and read a letter in favor of Mr. Wessin's proposal from a neighbor who was not able to attend. She said that last year, Mr. Wessin brought an application to the City which included three house, but it would require a variance. She added at the time, he was told that nothing would prevent him from subdividing the land into two lots and therefore he submitted an application for a Minor Subdivision that met the requirements needed without a variance. She said the property at 1801 Noble and how it was marketed as a single family home but was sold to Lecy Brothers Homes who planned to tear down the home and build three new ones. She stated Mr. Lecy would be unable to redevelop the land because City Code requires 80 feet of road frontage for every single family home and added he had full knowledge of this when the sale was done but after he went to City Staff to demand a road. She said this issue is causing the Planning Commission and City staff to require Mr. Wessin to dedicate his land for right-of- way purposes for a new street extension to Noble Road which would end in a cul-de-sac where the homes would be built. She said the estimated cost of would be a minimum of $550,000 which would be assessed to the owners who abut the street and since the measurement for the assessments is linear footage Mr. Wessin, who has the majority of it, would bare most of the cost but the main benefiter would be the developer, Mr. Lecy. Unofficial City Council Minutes -4- September 2, 2014 4C. Public Hearing - Preliminary Plat Approval - Hanson Wood Shores - continued Ms. Day stated she has presented three legal reasons why Mr. Wessin should not have to dedicate right-of-way for a future street and read a letter from Mr. Tannick who is in support the application. She said at the last Planning Commission meeting, Mr. Lecy stated he would pay for the street but after meeting, Mr. Wessin realized he would not, which has caused another delay and more expense to Mr. Wessin. When asked by Mayor Harris if Ms. Day was representing Mr. Wessin, she stated she was representing him as a friend and home owner on Sweeny Lake. The Mayor then asked if she was representing him in any particular business. She replied she has in the past, but not for this application. Ms. Day added she was here because she is familiar with the process and that questions regarding this could be addressed to her. Ms. Shanna Hanson, 4800 Killarney Drive, stated she was a new resident on Sweeny Lake and she supports everything Ms. Day said. She said she felt the required dedication would be a land grab. Mr. Roy Lecy, 1801 Noble Drive, stated he is part owner of the property and was working with the City on developing the land, but the only alternative they would agree to was with the addition of a road with a cul-de-sac and to assess the surrounding parcels. He said he proposed to build three homes, two new ones and one to replace the current home being torn down. He said whenever land is developed by a lake it could have an impact the lake and when his company is done developing it the impact would be a positive one. He added that he has submitted a PUD application that solves everybody's problem. He said it asks for a variance so that he can access the lots from the existing property driveway and he would run water from Noble Drive to connect city sewer to the property. He said then Mr. Wessin would not have to give up 30 feet of his property and be assessed for a future road. Mr. Lecy indicated he would dedicate 20 feet of his property to the City. He stated the variance needed would be similar to the one granted on St. Croix Circle earlier and added he does not want to put in a public road if it is not necessary. Mr. Scott Lucas, Olson & Lucas, Applicant's Attorney, stated he submitted one of the letters the Council received in their Council packet. He said he would like to clarify a statement made earlier regarding there being an obligation to plan for future development on the south end of the property. He said he thought this statement refers to City Ordinance Section 12.20 which in part reads "where adjoining areas are not subdivided the arrangement or streets in new subdivisions shall make provisions for streets." He said this subdivision woutd not fall under Section 12.20 because it is a minor one and added minor subdivisions are governed by Section 12.50. He said this has a variety of important implications with the first being Section 12.50 expressly provides that 12.20 is the street plan ordinance that would be superseded by Section 12.50. He questioned if a street should be a required in a minor subdivision application. He read Section 12.50, Subdivision 1 and said somehow we have gotten into a big discussion of streets which he felt was not appropriate with this ordinance. He said there are provisions for easements to be required in a minor subdivision application, but it must service a "necessary public purpose" and this one does not. He said "public purpose" was not defined in the City Code but is in Minnesota State Statute which he read. He said earlier it was stated that the property owners did not reach an agreement and added this is inaccurate because they all did except for Mr. Lecy which he felt changed tonight because Mr. Lecy said he will go along with the plan. He gave a history of his client's background regarding the property and respectfully requested the City grant the application without the road dedication. Unofficial City Council Minutes -5- September 2, 2014 4C. Public Hearing - Preliminary Plat Approval - Hanson Wood Shores - continued Mr. Joel Mintz, 1535 St. Croix Circle, said he lives across the street from the proposed development. He said that he heard tonight that Mr. Lecy would be ok with the plan that Mr. Wessin has and he would be willing to use the road that he currently has which is 20 ft. wide and in the future look for a variance. He said he felt there should no longer be an objection to Mr. Wessin's plans. Ms. Amanda Cialkowski, 1040 Angelo Drive, said she is on the Board for Sweeny Lake Association and has reviewed the materials being presented tonight. She said section 12.50 should be what applies here and the only issue is if this is necessary for a public purpose. She said she agrees Mr. Wessin should not have to continue to wait because his application meets the guidelines. Mr. Gerald Dahl, 4720 Killarney Drive, said he lives on the other side of the lake and that it is very important to keep Sweeny Lake as it is. He supported what has been said and Mr. Wessin's proposal. Mr. David Hanson, 1030 Angelo Drive, said he has lived on the lake for 49 years and that what is being purposed does not sound too wonderful. He stated the Sweeny Lake Association voted in favor of Mr. Wessin's application and wished the City would see it the Association's way. Mr. Bill Wilson, 1840 Major Drive, said he is the president of Sweeny Lake Association and that the Council has already received a resolution from them. He stated the Board would discuss future subdivisions, but for now the issue is Mr. Wessin's application and asked that the application be granted without any land dedication. Mr. Stephen Mahle, 1410 Spring Valley Road, said he does not see any reason to delay the approval of Mr. Wessin's request because it is fair and legal. Ms. Jane McDonald Black, 924 Adeline Lane, said she serves as an alternate on The Bassett Creek Watershed Commission but was not representing them today. She said she hopes the City would consider the good of the lake and environment for the public. Mr. Peter Mayer, 4800 Killarney Drive, said he was a new resident on the lake and he supports Mr. Wessin's application. He said the applicant is responsible for the water quality and the environment. Mayor Harris closed the public hearing. There was much Council discussion regarding the Preliminary Plat Approval for Hanson Wood Shores the Wessin Property. MOTION made by Council Member Fonnest, seconded by Mayor Harris to table the item until the October 7, 2014 Council meeting, upon a vote being taken, the following voted in favor thereof: Fonnest and Harris and the following voted against: Snope, Schmidgall and Clausen and the motion failed. Unofficial City Council Minutes -6- September 2, 2014 4C. Public Hearing - Preliminary Plat Approval - Hanson Wood Shores - continued MOTION made by Council Member Snope, seconded by Council Member Clausen to approve the Preliminary Plan for Hanson Wood Shore development without the land dedication with the following conditions, upon a vote being taken, the following voted in favor thereof: Fonnest, Snope, Schmidgall and Clausen the following voted against: Harris and the motion carried. 1. The City Attorney will determine if a title review is necessary prior to approval of the final plat. 2. A park dedication fee of$ 26,400 shall be paid before final plat approval. 3. The City Engineer's memorandum, dated March 17, 2014, shall become part of this approval. 4. The Fire Chief's memorandum, dated March 14, 2014, shall become part of this approval. 5. A Subdivision Agreement will be drafted for review and approval by the City Council that will include issues found in the City Engineer's memorandum. 6. All applicable City permits shall be obtained prior to the development of the new lots. 6. NEW BUSINESS 6A. Approve Resolution 14-71 Adopting a Proposed 2015 - 2016 Budget and Tax Levies Payable in 2015. Finance Director Virnig presented the staff report and answered questions from the Council. There was much Council discussion regarding the proposed 2015 - 2016 budget and tax levies payable in 2015. MOTION made by Council Member Fonnest, seconded by Mayor Harris to table the adoption of the resolution until the September 16, 2014, Council meeting upon a vote being taken, the following voted in favor thereof: Fonnest and Harris and the following voted against: Snope, Clausen and Schmidgall and the motion failed. MOTION made by Council Member Schmidgall, seconded by Council Member Clausen to adopt Resolution 14-71 Adopting a Proposed 2015 Budget and Proposed Tax Levies Payable in 2015, upon a vote being taken, the following voted in favor thereof: Snope, Schmidgall and Clausen and the following voted against: Fonnest and Harris and the motion carried. 6B. Announcements of Meetings. The next Council/Manager meeting will be held on September 9, 2014, at 6:30 pm in the Council Conference Room. The Human Rights Commission Conversations: September 11th National Day of Service and Remembrance will be held on September 11, 2014, from 6 to 8 pm at Second Harvest Heartland West. The Golden Valley Arts and Music Festival will be held on September 13, 2014, from 9:30 am through 9:30 pm on the City Hall Campus. The next City Council meeting will be held on September 16, 2014, at 6:30 pm in the Council Chambers. The Golden Valley Human Services Golf Classic will be held on September 19, 2014, starting at 8 am at Brookview Golf Course. Unofficial City Council Minutes -7- September 2, 2014 6C. Mayor and Council Communications. Council discussed revisiting the winter parking ordinance at the next Council/Manager meeting on September 9, 2014. City Manager Burt reviewed the agenda for the September 9, 2014, Council/Manager meeting. Mayor Harris gave an update on a proposed development in the City. 7. Adjournment MOTION made by Council Member Schmidgall, seconded by Council Member Fonnest and the motion carried unanimously to adjourn the meeting at 10:32 pm. Shepard Harris, Mayor ATTEST: Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk �;i�� of �,� �l��t � �+�. �'�,� Finance Department 763-593-8013/763-593-8109(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting September 16, 2014 Agenda Item 3. B. Approval of City Check Register Prepared By Sue Virnig, Finance Director Summary Approval of the check register for various vendor claims against the City of Golden Valley. Attachments • Document sent via email Recommended Action Motion to authorize the payment of the bills as submitted. ir��li V� �yp ✓ �T�,, ��,� Cit�Administratian/Council 763 593 3991 /763 593 8109(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting September 16, 2014 Agenda Item 3. C. 1. Gambling License Exemption and Waiver of Notice Requirement- Good Shepherd Church Prepared By Judy Nally, Administrative Assistant Summary As per State Statute organizations that conduct gambling within the City limits have to submit an application for a lawful gambling permit to the State after the permit has been approved or denied by the City. Depending upon the timing of the permit the applicants may request the City to waive the 30-day waiting period. Attachments • Application for Exempt Permit (2 pages) Recommended Action Motion to receive and file the gambling license exemption and approve the waiver of notice requirement for Good Shepherd Church. MINNESOTA LAWFUL GAMBLING 8/14 Page 1 of 2 LG220 Application for Exempt Permit An exempt permit may be issued to a nonprofit organization that: App�ICat1011 fee (nonrefundable) • conducts lawful gambling on five or fewer days, and if the application is postmarked or received • awards less than $50,000 in prizes during a calendar year. 30 days or more before the event,the application If total prize value for the year will be$1,500 or less,contact the Licensing fee is $50; otherwise the fee is $100. Specialist assigned to your county. Organization Information Organization Name: Previous Gambling Permit Number; �L'� � 1' rn UC�� Minnesota Tax ID Number, if an : Federal Employer ID Number(FEIN), if any: �i i � � �. Type of Nonprofit Organization (check one): �Fraternal �Religious Veterans �Other Nonprofit Organization Mailing Address: City: State and Zip: Coun i�� ?C � �-v'�' �. �a l ��!�� (M N 55�'�lv� l�t.�,�� tn Name of Chief Executive O icer(CEO): Daytime Phone: Email: � �.�� t . C2 C . b .11 ' -5�-1-'��1� u� ' t.�tecam ��'�I � ��.y Nonprofit Status Attach a copy of ONE of the following for proof of nonprofit status: � Nonprofit Articles of Incorporation OR a current Certificate of Good Standing. Don't have a copy? This certificate must be obtained each year from: Minnesota Secretary of State Business Services Division 60 Empire Drive, Suite 100 St. Paul, MN 55103 Phone: 651-296-2803 � IRS income tax exemption (501(c)) letter in your.organization's name. Don't have a copy? To obtain a copy of your federal income tax exempt letter, have an organization officer contact the IRS at 877-829-5500. IRS-Affiliate of national, statewide, or international parent nonprofit organization (charter). If your organization falls under a parent organization, attach copies of both of the following: a. an IRS letter showing your parent organization is a nonprofit 501(c) organization with a group ruling, and b. the charter or letter from your parent organization recognizing your organization as a subordinate. Gambling Premises Information Name of premises where the gambling event will be conducted (for raffles, list the site where the drawing will take place): � Address (do not use PO box): City or Township: Zip Code: County: f�� . 2t'� t��c.. t� . ��u� �9r�1�� 5�� 'f1�E' � rl Date(s) of activity (fo raffles, indicate the date of the drawing): �a�.r r� � i 1 �,(��5 Check each type of ga ling activity that your organization will conduct: Bingo* �Paddlewheels* �Pull-Tabs* �Tipboards* � Raffle (total value of raffle prizes awarded for the year: $ ) *Gambling equipment for bingo paper, paddlewheels, pu�l-tabs, and tipboards must be obtained from a distributor licensed by the Minnesota Gambling Control Board. EXCEPTION: Bingo hard cards and bingo number selection devices may be borrowed from another organization authorized to conduct bingo. To find a licensed distributor, go to www.mn.gov/gcb and click on Distributors under the LIST OF LICENSEES, or call 651-539-1900. LG220 Application for Exempt Permit s/14 Page2of2 Local Unit of Government Acknowiedgment CITY APPROVAL COUNTY APPROVAL for a gambling premises for a gambling premises located within city limits located in a township The application is acknowledged with no waiting period. he application is acknowledged with no waiting period. The application is acknowledged with a 30-day waiting he application is acknowledged with a 30-day waiting period, and allows the Board to issue a permit after 30 days period, and allows the Board to issue a permit after (60 days for a ist class city). 30 days. �The application is denied. he application is denied. Print City Name: �'�� UGf�I�''/ Print County Name: Si atu of Cit erson el: Signature of County Personnei: Title: Date: �r r _ Title: Date: TOWNSHIP (if required by the county). On behalf of the township, I acknowledge that the organization is applying for exempted gambling activity within the township limits. (A township has no statutory authority to approve or deny an application, per Minn. Statutes, section 349.166.) Local unit of government must sign. Print Township Name: Signature of Township Officer: Title: Date: Chief Executive Officer's Signature The information provided in this application is complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge. I acknowledge that the financial report will be completed and returned to the Board with'n 30 days of the event date. Chief Executive Officer's Signature: �c.l.�.�.`� Date: � I�� '1 `� C �` '�► ( Print Name: � ��o+fp Q Vr•i Requirements Complete a separate application for: Financial report and recordkeeping required. • all gambling conducted on two or more consecutive days, or A financial report form and instructions will be sent with your • all gambling conducted on one day. permit, or use the online fill-in form available at Only one application is required if one or more raffle drawings are www.mn.gov/gcb. conducted on the same day. Within 30 days of the event date,complete and return the Send application with: financial report form to the Gambling Control Board. Your a copy of your proof of nonprofit status, and organization must keep all exempt raffle records and reports for application fee (nonrefundable). If the app�ication is 3-1/2 years (Minn. Statutes, section 349.166, subd. 2(f)). postmarked or received 30 days or more before the event, the application fee is$50; otherwise the fee is $100. Make Questions? check payable to State of Minnesota. Call the Licensing Section of the Gambling Control Board at 651-539-1900. To: Gambling Control Board This form will be made available in alternative format(i.e. large 1711 West County Road B, Suite 300 South print, Braille) upon request. Roseville, MN 55113 Data privacy notice: The information requested application. Your organization's name and ment of Public Safety;Attorney General; on this form(and any attachments)will be used address will be public information when received Commissioners of Administretion,Minnesota by the Gambling Control Board(Board)to by the Board. All other information provided will Management&Budget,and Revenue;Legislative determine your organization's qualifications to be private data about your organization until the Auditor,national and international gambling be involved in lawful gambling activities in Board issues the permit. When the Board issues regulatory agencies; anyone pursuant to court Minnesota. Your organization has the right to the permit,all information provided will become order; other individuals and agencies specifically refuse to supply the information; however,if public. If the Board does not issue a permit,all authorized by state or federel law to have access your organization refuses to supply this information provided remains private,with the to the information; individuals and agencies for information,the Board may not be able to exception of your organization's name and which law or legal order authorizes a new use or determine your organization's qualifications and, address which will remain public. Private data sharing of information after this notice was as a consequence, may refuse to issue a permit. about your organization are available to Board given; and anyone with your written consent. If your organization supplies the information members,Board staff whose work requires requested,the Board will be able to process the access to the information; Minnesota's Depart- Regular Meeting of the Golden Valley Planning Commission July 28, 2014 A regular meeting of the Planning Commission was held at the Golden Valley City Hall, Council Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, Minnesota, on Monday, July 28, 2014. Chair Kluchka called the meeting to order at 7 pm. Those present were Planning Commissioners Baker, Blum, Kluchka, Segelbaum and Waldhauser. Also present was Community Development Director Mark Grimes, City Planner Jason Zimmerman and Administrative Assistant Lisa Wittman. Commissioners Boudreau-Landis and Cera were absent. 1. Continued Item — Informal Public Hearing — General Land Use Plan Map Amendment— 305 and 345 Pennsylvania Avenue South — CPAM-54 Applicant: City of Golden Valley Addresses: 305 & 345 Pennsylvania Avenue South Purpose: To change the designation on the General Land Use Plan Map from Low Density Residential to Medium Low Density Residential for the property at 305 Pennsylvania Ave. S. and from Mixed Use to Medium Low Density Residential for the property at 345 Pennsylvania Ave. S. 2. Continued Item — Informal Public Hearing — Property Rezoning — 305 and 345 Pennsylvania Avenue South —Z018-04 Applicant: Lake West Development, LLC Addresses: 305 & 345 Pennsylvania Avenue South Purpose: To rezone the property at 305 Pennsylvania Ave. S. from Single Family Residential (R-1) to Medium Density Residential (R-3) and to rezone the property at 345 Pennsylvania Avenue South from I-394 Mixed Use to Medium Density Residential (R-3) 3. Continued Item — Informal Public Hearing — Preliminary PUD Plan Review— Laurel Ponds, PUD #117 Applicant: Lake West Development, LLC Address: 305 and 345 Pennsylvania Avenue South Purpose: To allow for a 30-unit, detached townhome development Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission July 28, 2014 Page 2 The Informa/Public Hearings for Items 1, 2 and 3 were combined as was the discussion. Zimmerman reminded the Commissioners that these public hearings were tabled at their last Planning Commission meeting. He explained the applicant's proposal to construct 30 detached townhomes on the properties located at 305 and 345 Pennsylvania Avenue South. As a part of the proposal both of the properties need to be re-guided on the General Land Use Plan Map to the Medium Low Residential designation and rezoned to Medium Density (R-3) Residential. Zimmerman reviewed some of the issues discussed at the July 14 Planning Commission meeting including: the installation of a sidewalk along Pennsylvania Avenue, the inclusion of additional green space, a reduction in the number of driveways accessing Pennsylvania Avenue, the relocation, or clarification of the water and sanitary sewer lines, access to the Workabilities site to the east, and the use of an existing City easement along the south end of the property. He explained that the existing, 55-foot wide easement was established in 1978 as part of the Laurel Avenue Greenbelt, and that it also extends along the Workabilities site. He added that the easement agreement states that no structures or improvements of any type shall be permitted. Zimmerman discussed some of the outstanding concerns and issues including: the reduction in density or the consolidation of some of the units in order to obtain additional green space and some distance between homes, the rear and side yard setbacks for the proposed northernmost homes, the setbacks from the internal roadway for the easternmost homes, the construction of public versus private streets, and the creation of a development schedule and construction phasing plan. He stated that staff is recommending approval of the General Land Use Plan Map Amendment, the Zoning Map Amendment and the Preliminary PUD Plan, subject to the conditions outlined by Planning, Engineering, and Fire. Kluchka asked if parking is allowed on both sides of Pennsylvania Avenue. Zimmerman said yes, and added that allowing parking on both sides of the street will slow traffic. He said that staff doesn't see a great benefit in having the proposed bump-out parking areas. Waldhauser asked if the bump-out parking spaces would be for the Laurel Ponds use only. Zimmerman said he thinks that is the intent. Zimmerman referred to the proposed access to the Workabilities site and stated that it could be open during construction, and for emergencies, but through traffic and snow storage would not be allowed, and it would need to be maintained year-round. Zimmerman referred to the existing drainage, open space and walkway easement along the south end of the property. He said the applicant is not inclined to take out lots in the center of the project, but is more inclined to create a "beefed-up" green area at the corner of Pennsylvania and Laurel Avenues. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission July 28, 2014 Page 3 Kluchka referred to the 15-foot setback requirement for the proposed parking spaces on the east side of the site, and asked if that applies to both the Laurel Ponds property and the Workabilities property. Zimmerman said it does apply, however, the Laurel Ponds property could vary from the requirement because it is a PUD. The Workabilities property would need the variance because it is not a part of the PUD. Zimmerman referred to the southern portion of the property and discussed the concerns about the lack of a turnaround area at the Workabilities access site. He stated that anyone using that southernmost roadway would have to use a private driveway in order to turn around. He suggested that with some design changes, or perhaps attaching some of the proposed units, there might be better results in regard to the turnaround area. Zimmerman referred to the proposed private roadways and explained that the PUD ordinance says that streets shall be public unless granted a waiver. He said staff is concerned about allowing private streets unless all the maintenance and access issues are very clear. Kluchka suggested that the language in the condition regarding the sidewalk along Pennsylvania Avenue be changed from "shall consider" installing a sidewalk to "will install" a sidewalk. He also suggested that the language regarding the prohibiting of fences be changed to state that fences "shall be prohibited." Segelbaum asked how the park dedication fees will be used. Zimmerman stated that park dedication funds go into a general park fund, and aren't earmarked for specific projects. Segelbaum asked how this proposal deviates from the requirements in the R-3 zoning district. Zimmerman stated that the applicant is proposing a smaller setback along Pennsylvania Avenue, and the lot sizes are smaller. He added that the Zoning Code doesn't have language regarding detached townhomes. Waldhauser said she is most concerned about the effects on adjoining residential properties. Segelbaum asked if there is precedent of reducing easements to allow for development. Grimes stated that the City has, in the past, vacated easements that are no longer needed. Blum asked how many properties along Laurel Avenue have this easement. Zimmerman said the 55-foot wide easement is on this property, the Workabilities property to the south, and continues for quite a ways on Laurel Avenue for the green belt. Don Jensen, Lake West Development, LLC, Applicant, referred to the questions regarding the use of the easement area. He stated that the City has done nothing with this area since 1978 and he hasn't been able to find any documents, or plans regarding the use of the easement area. He referred to the discussion about having a green area as part of his proposal, and his conclusion is that there is no need for park space on this site because there are existing connections to other, nearby parks. He showed the Commissioners elevations of the proposed houses and stated that plans could maybe be redesigned to address the lack of a turnaround area on the southern portion of the site. He discussed the use of the easement, and explained how they could design the stormwater pond and Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission July 28, 2014 Page 4 the landscaped corner of Laurel and Pennsylvania Avenues all within a 45-foot area. He discussed the concerns about private roads and stated that the development will not work with public streets instead of private drives. Waldhauser asked if there could be parking on the internal roads. Jensen said parking would be allowed on one side of the road. Waldhauser asked how the surface water would flow through the site. Jensen referred to a grading plan of the site and explained how the water runs off the site. He added that there will be drain tile installed as well. Waldhauser asked if more trees could be planted going east and west on the site. Jensen said yes. Segelbaum asked Jensen why he needs to have private streets to make the development work. Jensen said all medium and high density projects have private drives. He stated that connecting the units with private drives is the proper way to do it, because public streets would wipe out the developable area, and wouldn't connect to anywhere else. Segelbaum referred to the landscaping plan for the southwest corner and asked Jensen if he would be installing the landscaping, or if the City would. Jensen said that they would install the landscaping, but he would like to talk to the Parks Department about the City installing additional items such as signage, kiosks, trellises, or things that might match the City's existing street furniture or theme. He added that he would also be extending the sidewalk along Pennsylvania Avenue from their site to Laurel Avenue, but not over to Western Avenue. Segelbaum said he is concerned about the existing homes directly across the street on Pennsylvania Avenue if the proposed new homes are only set back 13 feet from property line. Jensen stated that the neighbors in attendance at the neighborhood meetings did not express concern about that. He added that the proposed new homes will be 13 feet from the property line, but approximately 20 feet from the curb. Kluchka said he would feel more comfortable with the project if the parking bays on Pennsylvania Avenue were removed. Baker noted that the applicant has said the City could install additional landscape features on the southwest corner. He questioned if the applicant would be willing to install those additional landscape features. Waldhauser said she would like some of the houses to be smaller in size. She referred to the easement area and said she thinks reducing the size of the easement area and installing additional landscaping would be a trade-off for the lack of green space within the development. Segelbaum agreed that what is being proposed might be the best opportunity to get additional green space. Kluchka said he doesn't think "beefing up" the southwest corner is enough of a trade-off, and he would like to see better quality in the Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission July 28, 2014 Page 5 landscape design and maybe a walkway around the pond. Baker said he wants to be sure there is quality landscaping installed as well, and he would like to see a more detailed landscape plan before the Planning Commission recommends approval. Kluchka suggested that a condition stating that the easement reduction request will be considered, pending an enhanced landscaping plan, subject to Planning Commission review and City Council approval, at the time of the Final PUD Plan submittal. Waldhauser suggested a condition be added stating that final approval will be contingent on quality design and materials used. Grimes stated that the homes will be built in stages, so it would be difficult to enforce the design of each home. Waldhauser suggested guidelines. Kluchka suggested that a list of building materials be approved. Kluchka suggested a condition be added stating that the sidewalk shall continue along the east side of the property all the way to Laurel Avenue. Jensen asked that the words "landscaping framework" be used instead of specifying the landscaping materials. Waldhauser reiterated that she would like there to be greater diversity in the size and price of the units in return for consideration of the reduction of the easement area, setbacks, and allowing private streets. Kluchka stated that the market will generate diversity as well. Baker said he wants this kind of discussion when the Comprehensive Plan is next updated because these types of discussions are lacking on this Commission. MOVED by Waldhauser, seconded by Blum and motion carried unanimously to recommend approval of rezoning the property at 305 Pennsylvania Ave. S. from Single Family Residential (R-1) to Medium Density Residential (R-3) and to rezone the property at 345 Pennsylvania Avenue South from I-394 Mixed Use to Medium Density Residential (R-3) MOVED by Waldhauser, seconded by Baker and motion carried unanimously to recommend approval of changing the designation on the General Land Use Plan Map from Low Density Residential to Medium Low Density Residential for the property at 305 Pennsylvania Ave. S. and from Mixed Use to Medium Low Density Residential for the property at 345 Pennsylvania Ave. S. MOVED by Kluchka, seconded by Waldhauser and motion carried unanimously to recommend approval of the Preliminary PUD Plan for Laurel Ponds, PUD #117 subject to the following findings and conditions. Findinqs: 1. The PUD plan is tailored to the specific characteristics of the site and achieves a higher quality of site planning and design than generally expected under conventional provisions of the ordinance. Minutes of the Golden Valiey Planning Commission July 28, 2014 Page 6 2. The PUD plan preserves and protects substantial desirable portions of the site's characteristics, open space and sensitive environmental features including steep slopes, trees, scenic views, creeks, wetlands and open waters. 3. The PUD plan includes efficient and effective use (which includes preservation) of the land. 4. The PUD plan results in development compatible with adjacent uses and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and redevelopment plans and goals. 5. The PUD plan is consistent with preserving and improving the general health, safety and general welfare of the people of the City. 6. The PUD plan meets the PUD Intent and Purpose provision and all other PUD ordinance provisions. Conditions: 1. The plans prepared by EVS, dated 6/13/14 submitted with the application shall become a part of this approval. 2. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Engineering Division to Mark Grimes, Community Development Director, dated July 10, 2014, shall become a part of this approval. 3. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Fire Department to Mark Grimes, Community Development Director, dated July 7, 2014, shall become a part of this approval. 4. The Applicant shall submit a lighting plan as part of the Final PUD Plan set. 5. All principal buildings shall conform to the rear and side property setbacks when adjacent to a single family zoning district as outlined in Section 11.55, Subd. 3(C)(1). 6. No buildings shall be located less than fifteen feet from the back of the curb line for roads that are part of the internal road system as outlined in Section 11.55, Subd. 3(C)(2). 7. Unless a wavier is granted by the City, any streets constructed within the development shall be public streets as required in Section 11.55, Subd. 6(A)(6). 8. The Applicant shall install sidewalks along Pennsylvania Avenue running the length of the property and on the east side of the property south to Laurel Avenue. 9. The easement reduction request from 55 feet to 45 feet will be considered pending review of an enhanced landscaping plan. 10. The Applicant shall prohibit the installation of fences within the development. 11. The Applicant is encouraged to explore a range of housing types and designs. 12. Building materials shall be reviewed by the City prior to Final Plan approval. 13. Permits to construct parking bays on the property at 7400 Laurel Avenue shall be obtained by that property owner and shall not be located closer than fifteen feet to the side property line, as required in Section 11.47, Subd. 6(B), unless a variance is obtained. 14. Any cross parking agreements that are created shall be submitted to the City for review and shall be recorded with the Final Plat. 15. The Final Plat shall include "P.U.D. No. 117" in its title. 16. The City Attorney shall determine if a park dedication fee is required for this project prior to Final Plan approval. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission July 28, 2014 Page 7 17. All signage must meet the requirements of the City's Sign Code (Section 4.20). 18. This approval is subject to all other state, federal, and local ordinances, regulations, or laws with authority over this development. 4. Informal Public Hearing — Minor Subdivision —4XXX Harold Avenue — Fretham Twenty-Two — SU22-03 Applicant: Lake West Development, LLC Address: 4XXX Harold Avenue Purpose: To reconfigure the existing single family residential lot into finro new single family residential lots. Zimmerman referred to a site plan and explained that this proposal is the second part of a three lot subdivision. The first half was at 400 Decatur Avenue North. He stated that both of the lots in this proposal meet the minimum lot requirements in the Single Family R-1 zoning district. Lot 1 would be 10,151 square feet in size, with 81 feet of width at the front setback line, and Lot 2 would be 10,002 square feet, with 80 feet of width at the front setback line. Segelbaum asked if survey's submitted by applicants are verified for accuracy. Zimmerman stated that staff reviews surveys that are submitted, but rely on surveyors to submit accurate numbers. Segelbaum asked if this proposal meets the average width test recently discussed by the Planning Commission. Zimmerman stated that he did not consider the average width of the proposed new lots because the City Council recently amended the Single Family R-1 zoning district to state that lot width is measured at the front setback line. Grimes added that under today's Zoning Code, it meets all the requirements. Don Jensen, Lake West Development, LLC, Applicant, said it was important to show the building envelope on his plans and the practical results. He stated that the pie-shaped lots in this proposal work because the garages fit in the front, and there will still be strong front yard, and back yard space. Grimes added this proposal won't impact neighboring properties. Blum asked what will happen to the berm on the north side of Harold Avenue. Jensen said most of it would be removed for drainage and driveways, but that they will re-work it as much as possible. Kluchka opened the public hearing. Seeing and hearing no one wishing to comment, Kluchka closed the public hearing. MOVED by Baker, seconded by Segelbaum and motion carried unanimously to recommend approval of the Fretham Twenty-Two Minor Subdivision subject to the following findings and conditions. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission July 28, 2014 Page 8 Findin s: 1. Both lots of the proposed subdivision meet the requirements of the R-1 Single Family Zoning District. 2. The City Engineer finds that the lots are buildable. 3. The addition of the new lots will not place an undue strain on City utility systems. Conditions: 1. The City Attorney will determine if a title review is necessary prior to approval of the final plat. 3. The City Engineer's memorandum, dated July 7, 2014, shall become part of this approval. 4. All applicable City permits shall be obtained prior to the development of the new lots. 5. Continued Discussion Regarding Lot Depth and Shape Zimmerman noted that this is part of the on-going discussion about lot width, depth and shape. He explained that the Zoning Code defines lot depth as the mean horizontal distance between the front (street) line and the rear lot line. He stated that lots are not required to be a certain depth; however, the rear yard setback requirement in the R-1 and R-2 zoning districts is determined using the lot depth (20% of lot depth). He stated that Golden Valley's Subdivision Code uses the shortest distance between the front and rear lot lines when calculating lot depth. He added that, similar to lot width, lot depth is difficult to calculate for unusually shaped lots. He discussed other communities' lot depth requirements, and noted that approximately half of the surrounding communities he researched use the average depth, and the other half use the shortest distance between the front and rear lot lines. He stated that for cities using the average depth calculation, they define the rear yard setback as a set distance, typically 25 feet, rather than a percentage. Using this method removes the complication of calculating the average depth. Zimmerman next discussed lot shape. He showed the Commissioners several examples of past subdivision proposals, and explained four different tests he did on each of the examples. The first the test requires the minimum lot width to be maintained for a distance of 30% of the lot, the second test removes lot area from the total square footage that doesn't have the minimum required width, the third test requires a minimum width at the midpoint of the lot, and the fourth test is to use an "irregularity test" of P2/A = X with a cutoff of 22 being too irregular. Segelbaum asked if the current Subdivision Code permits variances. Grimes said the Subdivision Code states that the requirements of the Zoning Code need to be met when subdividing property. Kluchka asked if a recommendation can be made stating that the Planning Commission would like to have discretion, and not just rely on math, when reviewing subdivision Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission July 28, 2014 Page 9 proposals. Baker said it would be hard to make a decision if there aren't any requirements. Kluchka said he wants good math to use as a guideline, but he wants the ability to have discretion. Zimmerman said he doesn't think state statutes allow for discretion, but additional requirements could be put in the Zoning Code. Waldhauser added that the more flexibility in the requirements, the more uncertainty property owners have about what they own, and if they are able to subdivide their property. She said she would prefer to use a set number, rather than the lot depth, to determine the rear yard setback. Baker said he also likes the idea of a fixed number for the rear yard setback requirement. Baker said he would like to see more analysis of properties that required the minimum lot width to be maintained for a distance of 30% of the lot. He said he also likes the requirement that removes lot area from the total square footage that doesn't have the minimum required width. Kluchka questioned if that would limit the buildable area. He said he would like an opinion from the City Attorney about allowing the Planning Commission to have more discretion when reviewing subdivision applications, or possibly not having a public hearing if the Planning Commission doesn't have a choice about recommending approval or deniat. Grimes stated that state statute requires cities to have the public hearing process. The consensus of the Planning Commission was to recommend that new lots not only meet the minimum width (80 feet) at the front setback line (35 feet in the R-1 zoning district), but maintain that width continuously to a point 70 feet into the lot. Also, to modify the way in which rear yard setbacks are calculated in the R-1 and R-2 zoning districts so that they are a set distance of 25 feet instead of a percentage of the total lot depth. --Short Recess-- 6. Reports on Meetings of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority, City Council, Board of Zoning Appeals and other Meetings Waldhauser gave an update on a Bottineau meeting she attended. Kluchka gave an update on the recent Community Center Task Force meeting that he attended. 7. Other Business • Discussion Regarding Recycling Centers Zimmerman stated that the SIFCO site on Winnetka Avenue was being considered as a possible location for a recycling center use. Staff realized that the Zoning Code definition of a recycling center includes crushing, shredding, baling or compacting Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission July 28, 2014 Page 10 materials such as auto bodies and scrap metal. The City Council has asked the Planning Commission to discuss the need to update both the definition of recycling centers, and the appropriateness of recycling centers as a permitted use in the Light Industrial and Industrial Zoning Districts. Kluchka asked if the Council is considering redeveloping that area. Zimmerman said redeveloping that area is a discussion the Council wants to have. They also want to determine what types of recycling centers to allow. Grimes added that he is concerned about industrial properties that are located close to Single Family Residential properties. Baker said he is convinced that there should be more than one category for recycling. He said he also wants to be clear about what the City wants, and doesn't want. He asked if the Council's mostly concerned about noise. Zimmerman said the concern is noise, storage and the increased number of large trucks. Waldhauser agreed it would be helpful to have defined categories. Grimes suggested requiring there to be a minimum distance from Single Family residential properties. The consensus of the Planning Commission was to create at least two categories for recycling centers, one for low intensity typical household recyclable items, and one for high intensity for more commercial or industrial items. The less intense uses could potentially be allowed in the Light Industrial zoning district and the more intense uses could be allowed in the Industrial zoning district. The Commission also recommended defining a minimum distance that a recycling center must be from Single Family residential properties, and to consider the possibility of allowing recycling centers with a Conditional Use Permit. • Council Liaison Report No report was given. 8. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 10:10 pm. Charles D. Segelbaum, Secretary Lisa Wittman, Administrative Assistant Golden Valley Human Services Fund (GVHSF) Meeting Minutes July 7, 2014 Present: Hilmer Erickson, Kathryn Frommer, Elissa Heilicher, Michael Herring, Alan Ingber, Jennifer Rudolph, Connie Sandler, Peggy Watkins, Toots Vodovoz and Andrew Wold. Also present: Jeanne Fackler, Staff Liaison. Not Attending: Carolyn Kaehr and Craig McDaniels. Call to Order: Wold called the meeting to order at 6:48 p.m. Agenda Changes or Additions: No additions or changes to the agenda. June 9 minutes: Erickson moved and Frommer seconded the motion to approve the minutes from June 9. The motion passed unanimously. Upcoming Events: July 11th — Golf Classic. Sponsors: Checks have been received from Best and Flanagan, Preferred One, Anonymous Donor, BNC Bank, Central Bank, Gurstel Chargo PA, Herring Legal PLLC, Rudy Luther Toyota, Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc., and WSB & Associates. Door Prize Solicitation: Members contacted businesses for door prizes. Prizes were donated by Best Wishes Floral, Brookview Golf Course, City Looks Salon, Culver's, Einstein Bagels, Good Day Cafe, Gigi's Cupcakes, Gurstel Chargo PA, Holiday Inn Express, Kreative Acrylics, Massage Envy, MGM Liquors, Mort's Delicatessen, Pracna on Main, Salon Halo, Smashburger, Tugg's Restaurant, and Vic's Restaurant Food/Beverages: Crossroads Deti and Davanni's have been contacted. Volunteers: Sandy Werts, the Volunteer Coordinator, has recruited volunteers to assist with the event. Other Business: Fundraising Ideas: Events discussed were: Lawn Bowling Tournament during Valley Days, a "block party" with food trucks and music, a ribfest cook-off. Members narrowed the event to Lawn Bowling. September 13th is available for a tournament. Fackler will e-mail the information to the members. Members will then decide whether to proceed with the event. Application Packet: The approved application packet has been sent to the Communications Department for posting on the website. Applications will be due August 22. Solicitation Letter.�As of today, $10,454 has been received. Fackler presented the theme for 2014. Members suggested using a colored envelope for the letter. Fackler and Sandler will ask for quotes on the colored envelope. Wold reminded the members that the next meeting is scheduled for Monday, September 8. There will be no meeting in August. Adjournment: Heilicher moved to adjourn the meeting, Vodovoz seconded the motion. The meeting was adjourned at 7:48 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Andrew Wold, GVHSF Chair Jeanne Fackler, Staff Liaison Cl�� t�� ,ad�. �:�,,,i �� , ��/� Police Department 763-593-8079/763-593-8098(fax) � r �• � � Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting September 16, 2014 Agenda Item 3. E. Authorization to Sign Legal Services Agreement with Chestnut & Cambronne, P.A. for Prosecution Services Prepared By Stacy Carlson, Chief of Police Summary The City's legal services agreement with Chestnut & Cambronne, P.A. for prosecution services will expire on December 31, 2014. A new agreement covering the 4 year period beginning January 1, 2015, and terminating December 31, 2018 has been negotiated. The service terms and conditions for criminal prosecution work remains the same as the existing agreement. The agreement has been amended to reflect that legal services performed concerning property forfeitures related to criminal cases will not be billed on an hourly basis. This work will be billed on a contingency fee basis, where net recovery would be paid 1/3 to the prosecuting attorney and 2/3 to the City of Golden Valley. The financial terms of the new agreement call for an hourly rate of$125, plus expenses. The annual fee cap is set at $161,000 in 2015, $165,000 in 2016, $169,000 in 2017 and $172,000 in 2018, annually plus costs. The City Council is asked to authorize the Mayor and City Manager to enter into a Legal Services Agreement with Chestnut & Cambronne, P.A. for prosecution services for the period January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2018. Attachments • Correspondence from Chestnut & Cambronne, P.A. dated July 15, 2014 (2 pages) • MNCIS Filings by Type of Offense - 2013 (6 pages) • Legal Services Agreement (2 pages) Recommended Action Motion to authorize the Mayor and City Manager to execute a Legal Services Agreement with Chestnut & Cambronne, P.A. for prosecution services for the period January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2018. � � chestnut cambronne � � � ��- ��x A T T O R N E Y S A T L A W ��uvash�n�ton t�ven�e�ve�rth Suite 3�0 Minneapolos,N9N 55401-2048 'fo 612.339.7300 Francis]. Rondoni, Esq. F;g>�,336,�94p Minneapolis Office frondoni@ccesquire.com `%� "��'��k�� iy i�,�,su�x��aa 161 St,�r�thoroy Rvenue J111y 15, 2014 St.�:ss�1.�297�i90Cd F:651.291.0063 . . ,.. _�.., ,'� xs1:", '=e_r€ Stacy Carlson, Chief of Police GOLDEN VALLEY POLICE DEPARTMENT 7800 Golden Valley Road Golden Valley, Minnesota 55427 Re: Legal Services Agreement Dear Chief Carlson: Please find enclosed a proposed Legal Services Agreement for the four (4) years commencing January, 2015 through the end of 2018. This is consistent and nearly identical to the form of the previous Legal Services Agreement. The few changes I want to note is that the cap on the annual fees are slightly higher over the four (4) years. These really do not represent anything more than inflationary �hanges. We have also amended this contract to provide that we would no longer bill the City hourly for work relative to property forfeitures such as vehicles, but would do it on a contingency basis, two thirds (2/3) to the City, and one third (1/3) to the prosecuting attorneys. In this manner the City only needs to pay for legal fees relating to property forfeitures in the event there is a recovery. If you have any questions regarding the Legal Services Agreement, the amounts, or the term, please do not hesitate to give me a call. We are very proud and happy with our long time relationship with the City of Golden Valley and its Police Department, and want to do everything to be sure that our Legal Services Agreement meets your needs. Stacy Carlson, Chief of Police GOLDEN VALLEY POLICE DEPARTMENT July 15, 20134 Page 2 Finally, I enclose some portions of the data provided by Hennepin County relative to Criminal Prosecution in the suburbs. I decided to provide this to you to give a little background to you and any other members of the City staff or council who may be interested in comparisons. I highlighted a number of Cities that are comparable in terms of their total number of prosecutions, namely Eden Prairie, Maple Grove, Minnetonka, and Plymouth. Golden Valley prosecutes more than those other suburban communities in terms of numbers, and also leads those communities in terms of overall disposition of their cases. Golden Valley is one the highest of all of those cities in terms of fines collected as well. I call this to your attention because these comparison communities all have prosecutorial contracts and financial obligations that are greater than Golden Valley's, and in some cases substantially so. We know for a fact that Eden Prairie and Minnetonka both have substantially higher prosecution costs, with Minnetonka having two full time in house prosecutors. Furthermore, all of those other communities are in areas where the general cross-section of the people being prosecuted tend to have more money, whereas Golden Valley generally has a larger percentage of Defendants in poverly, and are more often represented by the Public Defender. I am hoping that this comparison will be helpful to anyone who may be interested so they can see that not only are we very effective in terms of being compared to some much larger and wealthier communities, but the City pays less for those superior prosecution services. Again, let me know if you have any questions whatsoever. Sincerely, CHESTNUT CAMBRONNE PA � __ _ _�___ __ _. �____-- ___ ..-. _..___. J._ __ - . __ __._�__ �-- _ _ �- _.�_. �--��--_ _: _---� �__ - � / - ---�__ �--' " �— __ _ -_ __c __�_ --_ Francis J. Rondoni FJR/ems Enclosures MNCIS Filings by Type of Offense — 2013 Misdemeanor and Gross Misdemeanor Filings listed by Prosecuting Agency. Offenses prosecuted by the Hennepin County Attorney's Office have been removed as they were not administered at the Suburban Divisions. Type of Offense Prosecuting Agency Domestics DWI Criminal Traffic Parking Total Bloomington 181 560 2,326 1,555 10 4,632 Brooklyn Center 114 327 1,230 585 13 2,269 Brooklyn Park 366 207 1,117 764 19 2,473 Champlin 42 82 208 281 1 614 Corcoran 7 27 15 29 0 78 Crystal 114 280 300 377 11 1,082 Dayton 8 9 17 38 0 72 Deephaven 4 37 22 58 1 122 Eden Prairie 51 318 359 489 3 1,220 Edina 40 195 279 1,665 6 2,185 Excelsior 6 72 31 40 3 152 Golden Valley 75 301 325 835 0 1,536 Greenfield 4 5 8 9 0 26 Greenwood 1 11 2 4 0 18 Hanover 3 2 2 0 0 7 Hassan 0 0 0 2 0 2 Hopkins 70 88 162 227 1 548 Independence 6 30 16 38 0 90 LMCD 0 22 79 0 0 101 Long Lake 7 9 16 11 0 43 Loretto 1 1 7 6 0 15 Maple Grove 78 394 437 512 3 1,424 Maple Plain 8 10 14 35 0 67 Medicine Lake 0 0 0 1 0 1 MNCIS Filings by Type of Offense — 2013 (continued} Misdemeanor and Gross Misdemeanor Filings listed by Prosecuting Agency. Offenses prosecuted by the Hennepin County Attorney's Office have been removed as they were not administered at the Suburban Divisions. Type of Offense Prosecuting Agency Totai Domestics DWI Criminal Traffic Parking Medina 6 61 49 72 0 188 Metropolitan Airport Commission 9 111 258 280 7 665 Minnetonka 66 183 361 635 15 1,260 Minnetonka Beach 0 3 1 6 0 10 Minnetrista 7 17 22 44 0 90 Mound 11 18 61 57 0 147 New Hope 62 87 156 290 12 607 Orono 10 56 56 138 0 260 Osseo 7 24 21 42 0 94 Plymouth 148 169 368 591 10 1,286 Richfield 82 332 518 611 3 1,546 Robbinsdale 55 183 256 619 13 1,126 Rockford 2 0 3 4 0 9 Rogers 31 50 118 163 3 365 Shorewood 7 57 20 40 0 124 Spring Park 7 13 14 29 0 63 St. Bonifacius 3 9 4 18 0 34 St. Louis Park 155 338 392 386 5 1,276 Tonka Bay 0 8 4 3 1 16 Wayzata 7 38 45 62 0 152 Woodland 0 4 3 5 0 12 Total 1,861 4,748 9,702 11,656 140 28,107 MNCIS Dispositions by Type - 2013 Non-Felony Dispositions Prosecuting Agency Found or Acquittal/ Total Pled Guilt Continued Dismissed Bloomington 2,479 1,209 490 4,178 Brooklyn Center 1,213 397 364 1,974 Brooklyn Park 1,353 638 403 2,394 Champlin 308 181 113 602 Corcoran 50 15 10 75 Crystal 605 255 162 1,022 Dayton 51 13 10 74 Deephaven 85 15 11 111 Eden Prairie 689 422 158 1,269 Edina 942 1,121 89 2,152 Excelsior 90 35 10 135 Golden Valley 1,205 133 131 1,469 Greenfield 18 4 3 25 Greenwood 11 4 1 16 Hanover 3 1 2 6 Hassan 1 1 0 2 Hopkins 251 187 119 557 Independence 63 19 10 92 LMCD 76 14 6 96 Long Lake 23 9 3 35 Loretto 17 2 3 22 Maple Grove 979 142 141 1,262 Maple Plain 48 14 9 71 Medicine Lake 0 1 0 1 MNCIS Dispositions by Type — 2013 (continued) Non-Felony Dispositions Prosecuting Agency Found or Acquittal/ Total Pled Guilt Continued Dismissed Medina 141 19 16 176 Metropolitan Airport Commission 336 182 45 563 Minnetonka 867 171 118 1,156 Minnetonka Beach 9 4 2 15 Minnetrista 56 36 9 101 Mound 79 35 20 134 New Hope 264 250 89 603 Orono 139 84 27 250 Osseo 53 26 14 93 Plymouth 879 293 99 1,271 Richfield 1,048 190 171 1,409 Robbinsdale 785 199 107 1,091 Rockford 6 5 0 11 Rogers 218 86 39 343 Shorewood 69 29 15 113 Spring Park 25 21 10 56 St. Bonifacius 19 10 4 33 St. Louis Park 777 347 97 1,221 Tonka Bay 10 3 2 15 Wayzata 74 72 9 155 Woodland 7 0 0 7 Total 16,421 6,894 3,141 26,456 MNCIS Fines - 2013 Community Imposed Coilected Uncollected Bloomington $187,485 $127,330 $60,155 Brooklyn Center $48,285 $26,422 $21,863 Brooklyn Park $54,404 $30,985 $23,419 Champlin $23,636 $16,400 $7,236 Corcoran $5,850 $4,591 $1,259 Crystal $42,135 $27,789 $14,346 Dayton $3,512 $3,242 $270 Deephaven $15,808 $11,331 $4,477 Eden Prairie $85,717 $63,139 $22,578 Edina $92,079 $73,333 $18,746 Excelsior $17,938 $12,419 $5,519 Golden Valley $147,005 $95,700 $51,305 Greenfield $1,318 $1,078 $240 Greenwood $3,200 $3,120 $80 Hanover $120 $0 $120 Hassan $17 $17 $0.00 Hopkins $21,358 $15,713 $5,645 Independence $7,338 $4,711 $2,627 LMCD $22,752 $19,792 $2,960 Long Lake $2,138 $1,818 $320 Loretto $3,514 $2,394 $1,120 Maple Grove $158,033 $107,809 $50,224 Maple Plain $2,939 $2,218 $721 Medicine Lake $0 $0 $0 All figures rounded to the nearest dollar MNCIS Fines - 2013 (continued) Community imposed Collected Uncollected Medina $24,125 $19,604 $4,521 Metropolitan Airport Commission $43,624 $33,298 $10,326 Minnetonka $76,967 $55,458 $21,509 Minnetonka Beach $3,000 $2,240 $760 Minnetrista $8,083 $7,174 $909 Mound $7,481 $5,715 $1,766 New Hope $23,202 $15,287 $7,915 Orono $23,675 $16,964 $6,711 Osseo $8,322 $5,144 $3,178 Plymouth $103,483 $69,430 $34,053 Richfield $59,266 $41,886 $17,380 Robbinsdale $64,718 $35,659 $29,059 Rockford $840 $800 $40 Rogers $18,947 $14,745 $4,202 Shorewood $13,279 $11,987 $1,292 Spring Park $4,002 $2,738 $1,264 St. Bonifacius $2,054 $1,160 $894 St. Louis Park $69,919 $55,499 $14,420 Tonka Bay $2,280 $2,280 $0 Wayzata $11,955 $10,262 $1,693 Woodland $1,328 $1,070 $258 All figures rounded to the nearest dollar LEGAL SERVICES AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of July, 2014, by and between the City of Golden Valley, a Minnesota municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Golden Valley" and Chestnut Cambronne, PA, hereinafter referred to as "Prosecuting Attorney". WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire to enter into an Agreement regarding prosecution services; NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises of the parties, Golden Valley and Prosecuting Attorney hereby agree: 1. Golden Valley hereby retains said Prosecuting Attorney to perform all of the criminal prosecution work and property forfeitures related thereto, for Golden Valley, and said Prosecuting Attorney agrees to do so under all terms and conditions set forth herein. 2. For said services, Golden Valley agrees to pay Prosecuting Attorney at the rate of One Hundred Twenty-Five and No/100 Dollars ($125.00) per hour plus costs, such payment to be on a monthly basis as billed. Notwithstanding, attorney fees charged to Golden Valley in the year 2015 shall not exceed One Hundred Sixty-One Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($161,000.00), annually plus costs. Attorney fees charged to Golden Valley in the year 2016 shall not exceed One Hundred Sixty-Five Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($165,000.00), annually plus costs. Attorney's fees charged to Golden Valley in the year 2017 shall not exceed One Hundred Sixty- Nine Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($169,000.00) annually, plus costs. Attorney's fees charged to Golden Valley in the year 2018 shall not exceed One Hundred Seventy-Two Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($172,000.00) annually, plus costs. 3. During the term of the agreement, in the event there are changes in law or court procedures that require the expenditure of significant time and/or services not currently contemplated by the parties, Golden Valley and Prosecuting Attorney agree to negotiate additional or other terms acceptable to the parties. 4. Notwithstanding the foregoing, legal services performed for the City of Golden Valley in the nature of vehicle or property Forfeitures, shall not be billed on an hourly basis. The Prosecuting Attorney will be reimbursed for its services on a contingency fee basis, wherein the net recovery of any property Forfeiture, including vehicles, would be paid One-Third (1/3) to the Prosecuting Attorney, and Two-Thirds (2/3) to Golden Valley. 5. The term of this contract shall be for four (4) years commencing January 1, 2015, and terminating December 31, 2018. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have, on the date first above-written, executed this Agreement in duplicate, each of which shall be considered an original. THE CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY CHESTNUT CAMBRONNE, PA ,_�-=,=----`-'__- - — , _____-- __.___.-____ __ Its Mayor --—�` rancis J. Rondoni Its City Manager CI�� t�� ,��,;;.i, „�,�,� � Administrative Services Llepartment 763-593-80131763-593-3969(fax) �w�° �� Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting September 16, 2014 Agenda Item 3. F. Adopt Resolution for Joint Powers Agreement with City of Minneapolis to Establish Responsibilities for Sale of Water and Sewer Services Prepared By Sue Virnig, Finance Director Summary Minneapolis sells water and sewer services to customers in Golden Valley. The two cities have never entered into a formal joint powers agreement for this purpose. The attached joint powers agreement with the City of Minneapolis will enable the City of Golden Valley to certify delinquent utilities for the City of Minneapolis. The process of certification will coincide with the City of Golden Valley's process for certification. Attachments • Resolution Approving the Joint Powers Agreement with the City of Minneapolis and City of Golden Valley to Establish the Responsibilities for the Sale of Water and Sewer Services by the City of Minneapolis within the City of Golden Valley (1 page) • Joint Powers Agreement Between the City of Minneapolis and the City of Golden Valley to Establish Responsibilities for the Sale of Water and Sewer Services within Golden Valley (2 pages) Recommended Action Motion to adopt Resolution Approving the Joint Powers Agreement with the City of Minneapolis and City of Golden Valley to Establish the Responsibilities for the Sale of Water and Sewer Services by the City of Minneapolis within the City of Golden Valley. Resolution 14-72 September 16, 2014 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION APPROVING THE JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS AND CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY TO ESTABLISH THE RESPONSIBILITIES FOR THE SALE OF WATER AND SEWER SERVICES BY THE CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS WITHIN THE CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY WHEREAS, Minneapolis sells utility services, such as water and sewer services to customers in the City of Golden Valley; and WHEREAS, the Cities wish to provide additional remedies for the collection of charges from customers who live in the City of Golden Valley, but receive one or more utility services from Minneapolis; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes 471.59 authorizes two or more governmental units to enter into agreements to jointly or cooperatively exercise any power common to the contracting Cities or any similar power; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council approves the Joint Powers Agreement between the City of Golden Valley and the City of Minneapolis. Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: Kristine Luedke, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayar and his signature attested by the City Clerk. JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS AND THE CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY TO ESTABLISH RESPONSIBILITES FOR THE SALE OF WATER AND SEWER SERVICES WITHIN GOLDEN VALLEY THIS AGREEMENT is entered into between the CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS, a Minnesota home rule charter city and the CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY, a Minnesota statutory city, herein after collectively referred to as the "Cities". RECITALS A. Minneapolis sells utility services, such as water or sanitary sewer services, to customers in Golden Valley. B. The Cities wish to provide additional remedies for the collection of charges from customers who live in Golden Valley, but receive one or more utility services from Minneapolis. C. Minnesota Statutes § 471.59 authorizes two or more governmental units to enter into agreements to jointly or cooperatively exercise any power common to the contracting parties or any similar power. NOW,THEREFORE, the Cities agree as follows: 1. PURPOSE. This Agreement shall establish the responsibilities of the Cities concerning assessment against real property in Golden Valley of utility charges incurred by customers receiving Minneapolis utility services at their Golden Valley property who have not paid their applicable Minneapolis utility bill. 2. SALE OF UTILITY SERVICES. Minneapolis will continue to provide the applicable utility service to customers in Golden Valley in accordance with existing practices and agreements, except as modified herein. Usage of Minneapolis utility services by Golden Valley customers shall be subject to the same usage rules imposed upon Minneapolis residents. 3. BILLING. Minneapolis will bill customers in Golden Valley for utility services Minneapolis provides to customers in Golden Valley. The billing rate will be the Minneapolis rate established for outside city customers. If the customer fails to pay a bill, Minneapolis will notify Golden Valley. Upon receipt of such notification, Golden Valley will certify the unpaid bill to taxes in accordance with Minn. Stat. Chapter 444 or other appropriate authority. Golden Valley shall promptly transmit the proceeds to Minneapolis after they are received in the normal course of property tax settlements. 4. WATER METERS. Minneapolis shall provide water meters at its customary charge for customers in Golden Valley using Minneapolis water. Minneapolis shall also be responsible for any necessary testing and replacement of the meters. 5. TERMINATION. Either party may terminate this Agreement upon 24 months advance written notice to the other party. FOR THE CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS Dated: , 2014 Approved: Department Head responsible for Contract Monitoring for this contract Countersigned: Finance Officer Designee Approved as to Form By: Assistant City Attorney CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY Dated: , 2014 By: Shepard M Harris, Mayor By: Thomas D Burt, City Manager G��1 U� � ,�� -r��; � �� ., �.,.'�,� Planning Departrnent 763 593 8095/763 593 8109(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting September 16, 2014 Agenda Item 3. G. Approval of Conditional Extension for Filing of Plat and Submitting Final PUD Plan Application - PUD #107 -The Towers at West End - Southwest Quadrant of I-394 and Highway 100- Duke Realty, Applicant Prepared By Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager Summary At the March 3, 2009, City Council meeting,the Council approved the Preliminary PUD Plan and Preliminary Plat for The Towers at West End PUD No. 107. The Council has approved eleven 180-day extensions since the original Preliminary PUD approval. The Preliminary PUD Plan and Preliminary Plat provide for the construction of a 4,000+space parking deck attached to several office buildings that are located in St. Louis Park. Due to market conditions, Duke is requesting an extension for the filing of their applications for the Final PUD Plan and the Final Plat. At this time, staff recommends that the extension of the PUD approval be a conditional 180 days. Staff will monitor the efforts by MCES and Duke to reach a conclusion on the permanent location of the lift station, the forcemain alignment, and all other appurtenances needed for the construction of the 1-GV-461 forcemain within the vicinity of the Duke property. All temporary and permanent easements shall be identified, and all land shall be transferred in connection with the project. Duke shall demonstrate to the City of Golden Valley its good faith efforts to act in accordance with the requirements of the PUD. Staff will report the status of Duke's progress with the MCES in 60 days (November 15, 2014). If adequate progress is being made to meet the terms of the PUD, the Council may extend the PUD for an additional term not to exceed 120 days (January 14, 2015). If adequate progress is not being made to meet the terms of the PUD,the Council may revoke any further extension of the PUD preliminary approval beyond the first approximate 60 days. Attachments • Location Map (1 page) • Letter from Duke Realty requesting an extension dated September 2, 2014 (1 page) Recommended Action Motion to approve an extension for submittal of the Final PUD Plan application and the Final Plat for The Towers at West End, PUD No. 107 until January 14, 2015, subject to the following conditions: 1. Duke shall submit cash deposits as requested by the City to cover legal and engineering costs incurred by the City for consideration of the Preliminary Plan. 2. Duke will be financially responsible for road construction under TH 100 and intersection improvements on the east side of TH 100 and traffic calming along the frontage road east of TH 100,to occur at the time building permits are applied for by Duke. 3. Duke shall cooperate with the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) in the construction of the 1-GV-461 Reliever project. The Reliever project is required to be constructed by MCES to increase sanitary sewer capacity to serve Duke's West End development and other future development in certain parts of Golden Valley and St. Louis Park. MCES and Duke to reach a conclusion on the permanent location of the lift station, the force main alignment, and all other appurtenances needed for the construction of the 1-GV-461 force main within the vicinity of the Duke property. All temporary and permanent easements shall be identified, and all land shall be transferred in connection with the project. If the City or MCES determines that there has not been adequate cooperation from Duke,the City retains the right to place additional conditions on future extensions to the Preliminary PUD Plan or the Final PUD Plan. 4. Duke shall demonstrate to the City of Golden Valley its good faith efforts to act in accordance with the requirements of the PUD. Staff will report the status of Duke's progress with the MCES in 60 days. If adequate progress is being made to meet the terms of the PUD, the Council may extend the PUD for an additional term not to exceed 120 days. If adequate progress is not being made to meet the terms of the PUD, the Council may revoke any further extension of the PUD preliminary approval beyond the first approximate 60 days. If Council finds that adequate progress is being made to meet the terms of the PUD, the Council may permit the extension of the PUD preliminary approval to continue for the remaining approximate 120 days. L_._1 4 L � I 'V-r � � zr� � �z� � � 310 CULONUIL DR ;5D� �'Oy 3b3 �__ � _ ` � �31Y 916 315 4540 +0�1S14i4� � �►g � '� 4316 4308 'S221�b2 5�1.5rZ1 Sili 5D31 . .._ : ` � �`4py qpp �., r' 43D0 a�x smia -'�+� �,, wEsrr�aon..►.nr ' 'f01 000 ;� �c+FnCResj e`o aio snr sos si� s25s3s�1 soxi ,�,o 'y�iz, �� 1 ai� aoe � sos 454145Z1451i� 400 sa� soe p �ri ,�oi 4223 r ;_. jURMPIKE RD . ' g; , yt � 433 416 N d17 \� d+ ,. �, >! � SOI A610. 508 �:� 4Y6 .� Sli g15 � swo sus si� sa� �a a � sn�[ � F as3o�szc. � ,��63z �za �i6 � bui �_ �, �'p � 55i sss � sis sii� � � si2 � � 'S' S03 4b21 I1459I. �^ � � 501 6t14 _... .GOS b�5 � 6U51 di4 �fi '��4532 � GIY d21 637 839 629 625 � S2fi 617 dY3� � �� i,. �� CoPonial Po»d a�� a�oo �z . , � _ � � 90Y �ze ,North Tyro)Park � n� 6�D52305220;SZ1052�. _ CIRCLE DNS 4543 5lfBWBBIIy Potld .. :512Dr ,, 5100'SG2U 46i6 � : � 817 901 _L. .L__ CTRGLE Dl�t3 - - -..r..,.....�._..._ 5014 , �t617 ' b10 'SJOi 1 i7x162215311 5E'MI!ltiBAl�8tlh 4� 816 , ` �53t�„5�11 �u 4509 '� 'ii?n6 Slbi � �531Y �111 .. 4301 `. +�520;�x500:4+t14 ,�qOp�\ i ' � f'` �1 � N�Lol�p Po�fd Zg � litf Loop�1�Ond ,8527 _.. .... . asis ssos (�.rw� s!''ys,�y.R� - _ �� SB WYJYIQO S TO WS T3g4 N8 NNfY100 S TO WB f394 _ _ WB L394 FtS SB FfWYIODS � � IEVTFRSTATE 394 _ 394 hiflV LN . .. _ . ._. r _ SB NWY2Qp S 70 EB I394 II�'!' EB�344 TO NB 141N`f1fl0 S �,�,� � A �39q . H . . . ... . . �. . . . City of St. Louis Park � �� `T ��n � �i`13zs '�M�1 �A410 .4100:433�4310 ` J �� f� d ' 1'3g�. 13�,�'4'i I315 i . t. � . 4 1345 +N50 Tt'�1 CRST''� .f�j�/'�� v 5tO 1345 Y34i1 �'�� 313354325A315! � / � �"' �'� 1{� 1410 1415 A+a#S �� 161 ,i �, � �, 1�05 `f�� . �� 14Z5�4�1 1415 14�1 452445�1 4��^{+r� � Subject Properties f'/ � 1�� A20 +� `�'•iaio uis r 110D,,�,� � 1435 �� 1�25 �Ille::/ I ! � �_ - f�� ' $ h Yr:1435 i� 51S(�aQ'� rSSfl . �/�95�� 1i23 :'} / � � ,Y�Q . 1450 �-. 14�{S 1450 � 'r�' �� ' �I430 ��^ 1445 � f O P,�,� i445 .,. 4345 .�,. l431 f e � ` iS10 y iSUb iSlO 4 SS1A '�441f {�� I4i4' i r�f fi�:�*e _: � � h7 �505 i505 44014J4$ � 492A Lt5�01 / fi�� ''�(�.� p 1 5 1 5 1 5 2 D �1 5 2 5 152� �j 1515 1 5� 1524. '4$43 4312 4310: ` /`x �',,, p �, isbo � Z � < ►�._.....___ � as2oasio,oa�o ,�.� ,��, : > � uzs �s� ��s �o �isiq asso aaio saai j�� }� �'�y� L495 1'S40' ��i545 15d0 I535 � �� . __. __ � DONJt�UkS.AYE _._ _ � 492�4815 `,.� �� 1'S�5 i8� 3$�+! f55a 46�0 .4555 453545254515 44$5rA4254415 4335 44d5 4345 � . lusc-evx.xla�_iA�cril� Carrgr.;�'�_G�i;uY3�e'S G 5�sf9 �`+I1► �� 7600 Utica Avenue South Suite 250 �� Mir:neapolis.MN55416 952.543.2900 www_dukerealty.cem September 2, 2014 Ms. Lisa Wittman City of Golden Valley 7800 Golden Valley Road Golden Valley, MN 55427 Re: Towers at West End PUD Application Extension Dear Ms. Wittman: Please find enclosed Duke Realty's Check No. 8044928, in the amount of $150.00, for the extension to submit our final PUD application for the Towers at West End project. If you have any additional questions or comments, please contact me at 952-543-2970. Regards, DUKE REALTY CORPORATION t� � � � �_ Gary Gleason Vice President, Construction enclosure c: Josh Budish, Duke Realty File C1�� 0� Finance De artment � 763-593-8013/763-593-8109(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting September 16, 2014 Agenda Item 3. H. Receipt of August 2014 Financial Reports Prepared By Sue Virnig, Finance Director Summary The monthly financial report provides a progress report of the following funds: General Fund Operations Conservation/Recycling Fund (Enterprise Fund) Water and Sewer Utility Fund (Enterprise Fund) Brookview Golf Course (Enterprise Fund) Motor Vehicle Licensing(Enterprise Fund) Storm Utility Fund (Enterprise Fund) Equipment Replacement Fund (Capital Projects Fund) As of August 2014, the City of Golden Valley is using $637,827 of fund balance to balance the General Fund Budget. Attachments • August 2014 General Fund Financial Reports - unaudited (2 pages) • August 2014 Conservation/Recycling Fund - unaudited (1 page) • August 2014 Water and Sewer Utility Fund - unaudited (1 page) • August 2014 Brookview Golf Course- unaudited (1 page) • August 2014 Motor Vehicle Licensing- unaudited (1 page) • August 2014 Storm Utility Fund - unaudited (1 page) • August 2014 Equipment Replacement Fund Recommended Action Motion to receive and file the August 2014 Financial Reports. City of Golden Valley Monthly Budget Report-General Fund Expenditures August, 2014 (unaudited) Over % 2014 August YTD (Under) Of Budget Division Budget Actuai Actual Budget Expend. 001 Council $294,840 12,899 166,944 ($127,896) 56.62% 003 City Manager 762,980 57,625 440,376 (322,604) 57.72% ooa Transfers Out 294,710 0 294,710 0 100.00% (1) 005 Admin. Services 1,676,280 324,430 1,141,850 (534,430) 68.12% oos Legal 135,000 15,694 76,127 (58,873) 56.39% (2) oo� Risk Management 300,000 0 202,970 (97,030) 67.66% o�� General Gov't. Btdgs. 556,990 38,925 336,819 (220,171) 60.47% 0�6 Planning 346,195 14,500 201,889 (144,306) 58.32% o�s Inspections 651,545 59,591 409,993 (241,552) 62.93% 022 Police 5,202,175 385,841 3,147,740 (2,054,435) 60.51% 023 Fire 1,200,190 88,822 710,132 (490,058) 59.17% 035 Physical Dev Admin 334,315 9,713 213,311 (121,004) 63.81% o3s Engineering 691,880 37,506 319,280 (372,600) 46.15% os� Streets 1,429,410 139,232 948,615 (480,795) 66.36% os5 Community Center 74,100 2,925 34,574 (39,526) 46.66% os6 Park& Rec.Admin. 679,345 50,755 418,621 (260,724) 61.62% os7 Park Maintenance 1,051,490 92,897 688,436 (363,054) 65.47% oss Recreation Programs 502,830 18,192 197,612 (305,218) 39.30% (3) TOTAL Expenditures $16,184,275 $1,349,547 $9,949,999 ($6,234,276) 61.48% (1)This transfer was made in June, 2014. (2) Legal services are through July. (3)Tennis program expenditures are lower due to contractual arrangement. Monthly Budget Report-General Fund Revenues August,2014 Percentage Of Year Completed 67.00% Over % 2014 August YTD (Under) of Budget Type Budget Actual Actual Budget Received Ad Valorem Taxes $12,358,005 0 6,417,261 ($5,940,744) 51.93% (1) Licenses 210,785 12,600 246,186 $35,401 116.79% Permits 725,000 80,527 866,221 $141,221 119.48% Federal Grants 0 6,360 13,860 $13,860 State Aid 255,390 10,145 149,092 ($106,298) 58.38% (2) HennepinCountyAid 31,205 0 31,758 $553 (3) Charges For Services: General Government 45,050 (199) 24,169 ($20,881) 53.65% Public Safety 163,870 16,820 108,057 ($55,813) 65.94% Public Works 141,000 13,046 100,700 ($40,300) 71.42% Park&Rec 525,270 36,688 249,626 ($275,644) 47.52% (4) OtherFunds 981,500 68,704 685,998 ($295,502) 69.89% Fines&Forfeitures 320,000 25,949 192,382 ($127,618) 60.12% (5) Interest On Investments 100,000 0 0 ($100,000) 0.00% (6) Miscellaneous Revenue 227,200 15,456 151,863 ($75,337) 66.84% Transfers In 100,000 8,333 74,999 ($25,001) 75.00% (7) TOTAL Revenue $16,184,275 $294,429 $9,312,172 ($6,872,103) 57.54% City of Golden Valley Monthly Budget Report-Conservation/Recycling Enterprise Fund August 2014 (unaudited) Over 2014 August YTD (Under) % Budget Actual Actual Budget Current Revenue Hennepin County Recycling Grant 56,500 0 0 (56,500) 0.00% Recycling Charges 332,400 28,611 185,783 (146,617) 55.89% (3) Miscellaneous Revenues 9,000 0 0 (9,000) Interest on Investments 5,000 0 0 (5,000) 0.00% (1) Total Revenue 402,900 28,611 185,783 (217,117) 46.11% Expenses: Recycling 447,135 22,033 264,089 (183,046) 59.06% (2) Total Expenses 447,135 22,033 264,089 (183,046) 59.06% (1) Interest Earnings are allocated at year-end. (2) Recycling Services are through July. (3) Quarterly charges for recycling went from $10 to$12 after April. City of Golden Valley Monthly Budget Report-Water and Sewer Utility Enterprise Fund August, 2014(unaudited) Over 2014 August YTD (Under) % Budget Actual Actual Budget Current Revenue Water Charges 4,251,750 443,761 2,217,112 (2,034,638) 52.15% Sewer Charges 3,300,970 287,163 1,976,183 (1,324,787) 59.87% Meter Sales 5,000 4,134 17,245 12,245 344.90% MCES Grant Program 118,730 0 0 (118,730) Penalties 110,000 1,876 89,883 (20,117) 81.71% Charges for Other Services 230,000 48,635 479,428 249,428 208.45% (1) State Water Testing Fee Pass Through 45,000 4,043 27,145 (17,855) 60.32% Certificate of Compliance 70,000 9,310 61,125 (8,875) 87.32% Interest Earnings 35,000 0 0 (35,000) 0.00% Total Revenue 8,166,450 798,922 4,868,121 (3,298,329) 59.61% Expenses: Utility Administration 1,377,255 91,988 1,164,935 (212,320) 84.58% Sewer Maintenance 2,488,530 182,732 1,515,185 (973,345) 60.89% Water Maintenance 4,363,650 323,576 2,533,360 (1,830,290) 58.06% Total Expenses 8,229,435 598,296 5,213,480 (3,015,955) 63.35% (1)This includes MCES Grant Program for residential reimbursements of$294,242. City of Golden Valley Monthly Budget Report-Brookview Golf Course Enterprise Fund (3)(4) August, 2014(unaudited) Over 2014 August YTD (Under) % Budget Actual Actual Budget Current Revenue Green Fees 880,780 150,047 571,072 (309,708) 64.84% Driving Range Fees 105,000 18,091 86,333 (18,667) 82.22% Par 3 Fees 173,200 26,324 84,166 (89,034) 48.59% Lawn Bowling 18,730 3,351 3,351 (15,379) 17.89% Pro Shop Sales 78,500 15,976 56,049 (22,451) 71.40% Pro Shop Rentals 227,800 54,446 168,848 (58,952) 74.12% Concession Sales 215,200 57,461 187,505 (27,695) 87.13% Other Revenue 70,155 529 77,845 7,690 110.96% Interest Earnings 6,000 0 0 (6,000) 0.00% (1) Less:Credit Card Charges/Sales Tax (35,000) (5,529) (13,023) 21,977 37.21% Total Revenue 1,740,365 320,696 1,222,146 (518,219) 70.22% Expenses: Goif Operations 655,995 59,619 452,594 (203,401) 68.99% (2) Course Maintenance 778,840 62,114 446,929 (331,911) 57.38% Pro Shop 105,705 6,951 87,556 (18,149) 82.83% Grill 177,910 35,357 144,214 (33,696) 81.06% Driving Range 48,075 6,595 29,748 (18,327) 61.88% Par 3 Course 3,500 4,218 14,655 11,155 418.71% Lawn Bowling 141,965 18,576 167,880 25,915 118.25% (5) Total Expenses 1,911,990 193,430 1,343,576 (568,414) 70.27% (1) Interest Earnings are allocated at year-end. (2) Depreciation is allocated at year-end. (3) Course opened April 9. (4) Course closed on June 19 due to flooding. Reopened partially on June 25. (5) Lawn Bowling opened August 15. City of Golden Valley Monthly Budget Report- Motor Vehicle Licensing Enterprise Fund August 2014(unaudited) Over 2014 August YTD (Under) % Budget Actual Actual Budget Current Revenue Interest Earnings 3,800 0 0 (3,800) 0.00% (1) Charges for Services 396,410 28,792 242,636 (153,774) 61.21% Total Revenue 400,210 28,792 242,636 (157,574) 60.63% Expenses: Motor Vehicle Licensing 400,210 28,310 247,088 (153,122) 61.74% Total Expenses 400,210 28,310 247,088 (153,122) 61.74% (1) Interest Earnings are allocated at year-end. City of Golden Valley Monthly Budget Report-Storm Utility Enterprise Fund August, 2014(unaudited) Over 2014 August YTD (Under) % Budget Actual Actual Budget Current Revenue Interest Earnings 45,000 0 0 (45,000) 0.00% (1) Storm Sewer Charges 2,226,920 189,015 1,457,502 (769,418) 65.45% Bassett Creek Watershed 998,800 0 0 (998,800) 0.00% Miscellaneous Receipts 200,000 0 27,369 (172,631) 13.68% State Grant-Other 0 0 0 0 Total Revenue 3,470,720 189,015 1,484,871 (1,985,849) 42.78% Expenses: Storm Utility 2,474,535 136,043 869,872 (1,604,663) 35.15% (2) Street Cleaning 124,690 6,549 92,303 (32,387) 74.03% Environmental Control 309,225 17,805 153,812 (155,413) 49.74% Debt Service Payments 433,510 21,441 1,604,967 1,171,457 370.23% (3) Total Expenses 3,341,960 181,838 2,720,954 (621,006) 81.42% (1) Interest Earnings are allocated at year-end. (2) Depreciation is allocated at year-end and. 2012 PMP and 2013 PMP are not complete. (3)Refunded 2004C Issuance 5 years early. 2014 Equipment Replacement Fund(CIP)-Fund 5700 2014 Aug YTD Budget Total Actual Remaining Revenues: Proceeds-Certificate of Indebtedness 750,000 0 747,600 (2,400) SaleofAssets 35,000 500 54,636 19,636 Miscellaneous 0 93 149 149 Interest Earnings(allocated at year end) 17,394 0 0 (17,394) Total Revenues 802,394 593 802,385 (9) Expenditures: Program# Project Number Project Name 5700 Bond Expenditures 0 0 15,240 (15,240) 5701 V&E-001 Marked Squad Cars(Police) 35,000 0 34,270 730 (1) 5702 V&E-002 Computers and Printers(Finance) 60,000 1,968 28,108 31,892 5703 V&E-003 Imaging System(Finance) 26,000 0 7,676 18,324 5712 V&E-012 Asphalt Paver(Street) 100,000 0 86,800 13,200 5733 V&E-019 Computer Servers 40,000 0 3,492 36,508 5742 V&E-069 Utility Tractor/Mower(Park) 25,000 0 31,303 (6,303) 5795 V&E-071 Pickup Truck(Park) 45,000 0 27,883 17,117 5800 V&E-084 Self Contained Breathing Apparatus(Fire) 300,000 0 264,781 35,219 5786 V&E-089 Sidewalk/Maintenance Tractor(Street) 158,000 0 138,093 19,908 5783 V&E-101 Unmarked Police Vehicle(Police) 30,000 0 35,189 (5,189) 5797 V&E-111 Dump Truck(Street) 80,000 25,531 70,120 9,880 Total Expenditures 899,000 27,499 742,955 156,046 (1)Computers are replaced every 4-5 years and purchased throughout the year based on available time. �i�y ��f ,� e Plannin � g�c�a�rtmcnt 763-593-8095/763-593-8109(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting September 16, 2014 Agenda Item 3. I. Approval of Plat- Golden Valley Homes Prepared By Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager Summary At the August 19, 2014, City Council meeting, the Council held a public hearing on the Preliminary Plat for the minor subdivision of Golden Valley Homes (1001 Lilac Drive North). After the hearing, Council approved the Preliminary Plat which will allow four new developable lots. The Final Plat of Golden Valley Homes has now been presented to the City. Staff has reviewed the Final Plat and finds it consistent with the approved Preliminary Plat and the requirements of City Code. Attachments • Resolution for Approval of Plat- Golden Valley Homes (1 page) • Final Plat of Golden Valley Homes (1 page) Recommended Action Motion to adopt Resolution for Approval of Plat- Golden Valley Homes. Resolution 14-73 September 16, 2014 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION FOR APPROVAL OF PLAT - GOLDEN VALLEY HOMES WHEREAS, the City Council for the City of Golden Valley, pursuant to due notice, has heretofore conducted a public hearing on the proposed plat to be known as Golden Valley Homes covering the following described tracts of land: Commencing at a point on the East line of Government Lot 1, Section 33, Township 118, Range 21, 835.9 feet South of Northeast corner of said Section 33, Township 118. Range 21; thence South 217.8 feet along East line said Section 33, thence West at right angles to said East section line a distance of 333.0 feet; thence at right angles North 217.8 feet, thence at right angles East 333.0 feet to the point of beginning, according to the United States Government Survey thereof and situate in Hennepin County, Minnesota. Except that part of the above-described land shown as Parcel 14F on Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of Way Plat No. 27-104. WHEREAS, all persons present were given the opportunity to be heard. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council for the City of Golden Valley, that said proposed plat be, and the same hereby is, accepted and approved, and the proper officers of the City are hereby authorized and instructed to sign the original of said plat and to do all other things necessary and proper in the premises. Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by the City Clerk. GOLDEN VALLEY NOMES R.T. DOC. N0. KNOW ALL PERSONS BY MESE PRESENTS: That Moz ZNo�aron,fee owner oi t�e following descrlCetl property I Commencing at a poinl on the EaN Itne of Cowmment Lot 1,S�ction 33,TownMp 11&Ranga 21,835.9 feet SouN of NarNsaat eomer of said Section 33,Townsh(p 118,Ranq�21;thanee Sauth 217.8 feet along East Ihe of said Sedian 33;thence Weat at right mglas to aaid Eaat necHon Iine a Eolonce of 333.0 feet;thence at right mgba NUN 217.8 feet;thence at ng�t I anglm Eoet 333A faet to Ne point of baqfnnMg,aceardiny to 1Ma United 5!alea Go�mnmml Survey lhxeai and aftuate tn Hennepin Caunty.Minneaoia. Exeept t�ot poA of the abovs-deewbetl IanC ehown aa Parcd 1�F m Minnmota Department of Traneportatbn Ri9ht of Way Vlot No.27-104. i �I ` ��r---------------1�� Has caused the same to be surveyed and Dlotted ae GOLDEN VALLEY HOMES antl does hereby dedicate to l�e publlc for public use forever the drainage and utility easemmts os shown on lhis �` I plot. � �.-`�,i �� I �6°� In witness whereoi sold Max 2Nayaran,�as coused lhese presmts lo Oe siqned by its proper oitcer this_day oi 20_ I�� ^` � I ��` � ♦ � <��v�� I � • �� I i�� I Mon Zeloyoron ( � I t�_! I STAlE OF MINNESOTA �`Y'.; � I CWNtt OF . .�� l 'f � i I r � � I- Tha fwagoing instrument woa acknoMetlged Defore me thls day of .20�by Maz ZNayaron,a Minnaeoto IlmNed IiaDility canpony,on beholt oi Me canpany. _F � — _ � I I ` I � � 4s I I I � �� I Fan!YNOOT Faun„MNDOT I Notory PuClic, County,Minnnota a �manumant eappeE t eappsA ------------ �� SA9°4S'S7"W (�«en i.007 2ll.59 m frb.asz) ^ ----- ` ------ My Commias'wn expirn - � 0 81.00 0 0 0 10� — — —.— — — — � r — — — _ — — _ — —.� ; I I,Eric R.Yckoryuus,do heraby certify that this plal wos prepared by me or unAer my direct supervision; thal I am a duly LicenseE Land Survayor in the State of Ninneeota;that this plot Is a � �8 6� �� ,� correcl represmtotion of the Doundary aurvey, lhat all mathemotkal data and IobNs orc cwrectly designoted on t�o plat;that all mon menls depicted on this plot hove Geen,w will be correcHy � I eet withm one yeor,t�ot all w ter boundarin onE wet londa,as definetl in Minnceoto Slotutee,Seetion 505.01,Subd.3.ae of t�e dateuot this certif ate ore aliown and lobeled on Mis plot,and � � � I 1 all public woys ore shown ond labded on this ploL � I 1� � I 11 � I I �4 DateO t�ls_tlay of .20_ F ' � I $I 4 � � i I I a � - ` c I � O1I II a i I Erit R.Yekaryoua,lkmaed Lond Surveyor ��' � � I l� � �� O i I i;i Minnesota Lkensa Number 44125 �` t` N IN g�� N '_ I STAIE OF MINNESOTA �-��" ��`�,� � �� `� COUNtt OF �^� ' �` �,��! .l��..� Q� — — — —.— — _ — J This instrument was ocknowledged�etore me t�is_day of .20�by Eric R.Yckoryous. ,�� ` I V ��'�s I � � f,�' ,� ' � $ �I � _ _59.98_ _ _ _ _ _ 69.79_ _ r <'��/ �� r �� - � �', w' II i s II to --- �� YJ�, I Nocary a�era cwocy,M��onoto I I I 8 I � % !�' , I - My Commission ezp'r � I � � I � I �"''_'_' ''f� crTr couNa�,c�<v or caae�vausy,u��oio o I lo I I c i I � I Ir I I c� ___ i' I ll�is plat of fALDEN VALLEY HOMES was opOrovetl antl accepted Dy l�e qty CouncN ot the CiTy of Golden Valley,Minnesoto ol a rogular meeting t�ereof hNtl t�fs doy of � �f __, 20_I(opplicable,the writlen comm is and recommmdalions ot the Commiesioner of Transportation and tne County Hiqhway Engineer have been roceived by t�e City«the prescriDed 30 \ '�' I Igz $� � G 3 � g C / day period�os Napsed without rtteipt of�such commmts ond rttommendations,os provided by Minnesota Slatutn,Section,505.03,Subd.2. \\ ,��. I I NI I r 'z, � I i i I aty co��i,c�cY o�caae�Valley,Minnesoto \ � I I � I � i By Ma�or By Clerk 6� \\\ I II � � I i' ( I \ I 1 RESIDENT AND REAL ESTATE SERNCES,Hannepin Cwnty,Minnesota �� \ I I � � i I � 10 � 1 hereDy certi/y thal taxes poyaDle in 20_and priof yeafs Ilove baen paid for the land tleserlbed on thk plal,datM Uis_day of 20_ �� \ �� — �6 8� — — — � i I 0 0 0 o`�B � Mork V.Chapin,County Autlitor By Deputy \�\ \ ` 8�� '% 8&7U �` I `� ,s� ,�b �. _i_ -� \ FW�a+/�' S89°48'S7"W \ 162.89 ��j�'89°51'32"E \ ""`�`""� �-LIND3AY 3TREET- � ��.74 � o.eo',w..asi7 �� 41 SURYEY DIVISION,Hennepin caro<Y,M��to \ N00°08'35"W I Purauonl lo MN.STAT.Sec 3838.565(7969),Mis plat hoa 6een opproved thia_day of 20_ � _ _ � �� ..��......'. � .. � �.._._ � � I Chris F.MaNa,County Surveyor By \ I \ \ \\ � REGISIRAR OF TI7LE5,Hennepin Counly,Minnesota �� ______ ______________________ I�ereby eMify that the wit�in plat of GOLDEN VALLEY HOMES was filed fn thie oMce t�ia_Eay of � � ( � � I 20�at o'clock .M. — — II � I Martin MCCormi<k,Registrar of Titles By Daputy I I I � • ��.I i�`� � .i I I DRAINAGE AND U7ILITY EASEMEN75 SHONN 7HUS `_��i�/�� I i , „ I � i i . ..��r;��.� � ,� ��' . I I_6 ,-,�, ,'I� �� I The East line of Lot 5, Block 8, WOODLAWN PARK is assumed to o e--1 o I have a bearing of North 00 degrees 05 minutes 48 seconds West. � _ J L - � - - _ - - - - - - - � • Denotes monument found 1/2 fnch iron pipe, unless NO SGUE OihefWi3B ShOWfI. B�NG 10 FEET IN N107H AND ADJOINING RId17-OF-WAY UNES AND BEING 8 FEET IN WID7H AND ADJOINING LOT p Denotes 1/2 inch by 14 inch iron monument set LINES,UNLE55 OTiERYASE SHOWN ON hIE PLAT. N ORTH and marked by L.S. No. 44725. o S� �ACRE LAI�8URVEYINQ �� ( �N��r> _;�,�� BLAINE,MN �:j--I I �u; �_e_�_r_r_r_a_s r s i�_e_�r_r_r_s+r_s!r 4.L�y 4/i ;agt'�, J � � I ��.. �.' Park and Recreation Department � 763-512-2345/763-512-2344(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting September 16, 2014 Agenda Item 3. J. Adopt Resolution Acceptance of Grant and Donation Prepared By Rick Birno, Director of Parks & Recreation Summary As adopted in the Donation/Gift Policy, a gift of real or personal property must be accepted by the City Council by resolution and be approved by a two-thirds majority of the Council. A cash donation must be acknowledged and accepted by motion with a simple majority. We have prepared the attached resolution detailing various donors and their gifts for your consideration. Attachments • Resolution Accepting Donations on behalf of the City of Golden Valley (1 page) Recommended Action Motion to adopt Resolution Accepting Donations on behalf of the City of Golden Valley. Resolution 14-74 September 16, 2014 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution 04-20 on March 16, 2004, which established a policy for the receipt of gifts; and WHEREAS, the Resolution states that a gift of real or personal property must be accepted by the City Council by resolution and be approved by a two-thirds majority of the Council. A cash donation must be acknowledged and accepted by motion with a simple majority. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council accepts the following grants and donations on behalf of its citizens: $2308.37 from friends of the Barrios family and Twin City Tennis Camps, Inc. for a memorial bench at Seeman Park. $750.00 from Twin City Tennis Camps, Inc. for Quick Start Tennis Lines at Brookview Park, Lions Park, and Wesley Park. $500.00 from the Golden Valley Community Foundation for the Brookview Ghoulish Golf Halloween event. $2,600.00 from Mary Towle for a memorial tree and memorial park bench at Brookview Park. Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by the City Clerk. city 0 golden MEMORANDUM alley City Administration/Council 763-593-8003/763-593-8109(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting September 16, 2014 Agenda Item 3. K. Board/Commission Appointments Prepared By Shep Harris, Mayor Summary Each year the City Council conducts interviews with persons who have applied to serve on a board and/or commission. After the interviews are conducted the Council makes their appointments. Recommended Action Motion to make the following appointment: Planning Commission Andy Johnson 1 year term term expires- May, 2015 Human Rights Commission Simon Gottlieb 2 year term term expires- May, 2016 Board of Zoning Appeals Richard Orenstein 1 year term - regular member term expires- May, 2015 From: Date: September 15, 2014 at 20:48:13 CDT To: <asnopeggoldenvalleymn. oovv> Subject: Subdivision Moratorium Dear Mr. Snope, I believe I understand the political and financial pressures you are under, as a city council, to approve requests to subdivide properties. I certainly understand people's desire to live in this neighborhood. It is culturally and environmentally diverse, very close to downtown, and has great schools. I feel a responsibility to share those benefits with others. I also feel a responsibility to do what I can to preserve what makes the Tralee neighborhood what it is. It is that responsibility which compels me to write. My husband and I live at 117 Paisley Lane, one of the properties that adjoins 221 Paisley Lane, where a property subdivision is planned. Early last week we were sitting on our back deck when we heard a male pileated woodpecker, then saw him in one of the trees in the wooded area between the two properties. This entire summer we have had a family of sharp shinned hawks who have nested here. And we first saw the great horned owl that lives and hunts in these woods 20 years ago, on the day we bought our house. Over the years we have regularly seen fox, deer, and many other wildlife species. Our house sits on a moderate slope, at the bottom of which there used to be a swamp. That prior swamp is part of the yard of six properties. The area has standing water on an occasional basis every year, and most springs it isn't dry until late in April. This past spring it finally dried out in early June. As you consider the moratorium tomorrow on further subdivision development I implore you to consider a number of questions. First, if we continue to subdivide properties, how do we ensure that the desirability of our neighborhoods remains? With respect to the natural spaces within these properties, what is important for us—and you as the stewards of our community—to preserve? What measures do you need to put in place to do so? And finally, how will you ensure that they are implemented? Until these questions are answered it is imperative that we institute a moratorium on further subdivision by developers. Respectfully, Lois Lenarz From: Diane Richard Date:September 15, 2014 at 18:55:40 CDT To: "asnope@goldenvallevmn.gov" <asnope@goldenvalleymn.gov> Subject: FW: Meeting tomorrow 9-16-14 Dear Council Member Snope— I'm writing in advance of tomorrow's City Council meeting regarding the agenda item to review the proposed sub-division moratorium. I encourage you to vote "Yes"to the moratorium—this will allow the Council and the staff the necessary time to review the concerns brought forward by both the residents of Tralee and Tyrol Hills: Green space (trees and wildlife), density, minimum lot size, set backs, "magic math," run off, and architectural style guidelines to ensure that new developments fit harmoniously with the terrain and existing neighborhood character.All of these points will support the existing Comprehensive Plan. Here is a copy of our original petition. All of these folks stand behind you to vote "Yes" to the moratorium. Thank you for the work you do to preserve the Golden Valley of today and tomorrow! We'll be watching from home. Sincerely, -Diane Richard 217 Paisley Lane Golden Valley, MN 55422 Diane Richard Director of Human Resources MINNETROMX From: Michael Alexin , Sent: Sunday,September 14, 2014 9:03 PM To: Harris, Shep; Clausen,Joanie; Fonnest, Larry; Schmidgall, Steve; Snope, Andy Cc: MARKS DIETZ; ; Damon&Angelique Struyk; Kim Wolson And Norm Subject: North Tyrol Pending Subdivisions Dear Mayor Harris and esteemed members of the City Council: I am writing to express my sincere thanks for your support of a moratorium on residential subdivisions in Golden Valley. We in the North Tyrol community appreciate your careful consideration of the appropriate lot sizes necessary to preserve the beautiful, spacious and wooded character of many areas of Golden Valley, especially the Sunnyridge/Meadow Lane neighborhood of North Tyrol hills. Our community is unique its natural beauty, privacy and proximity to downtown Minneapolis, which is why many of us chose to buy and reside here. I have owned my home at 208 Sunnyridge Circle for nearly thirteen years, and have been very dismayed by several recent developments that disrespect the character of our community. First, last year,the Minneapolis Parks Board allowed the cutting and removal of hundreds of healthy trees behind my home in Wirth Park to build a massive, oversized mountain-bike course. The trail unnecessarily was placed 25 yards from my patio, and after many meetings and emails,the Parks Board has declined to make any alterations to the trail to restore some of my lost privacy and reduce the constant noise. Next,the beautiful estate at the corner of Meadow Lane and Glenwood Ave. was carved up into tiny lots more befitting of South Minneapolis. Now the same developer is looking to profit from the division of two more wooded plots in our immediate neighborhood: 221 Sunnyridge Lane and 200 Meadow Lane North. If these both are allowed to proceed,the character and desirability of our community may be negatively affected forever. I urge you to please act now to table the most recent additional request to subdivide 200 Meadow Lane North (into THREE build-able lots)-- before the damage is done. This will ensure that whatever happens there will be in line with your current thinking and direction in lot size. I also would like to request your consideration of a 15,000 square foot minimum build-able lot size for any further subdivisions, including the proposed subdivision of 200 Meadow Lane North. Thank you for listening and for your consideration. This issue is of major importance to many of us in North Tyrol Hills. Respectfully submitted, Michael E.Alexin 208 Sunnyridge Circle Sent from my iPad From: Tom Hoffmann Date: September 14, 2014 at 16:02:38 CDT To: Shep Harris <sharriskgoldenvalleymn.gov>, Joanie Clasen <jclausen(a�goldenvalleymn.gov>, Steve Schmidgall <sschmidgalIggoldenvalleygov>, Larry Fonnest<lfonnestgjzoldenvalleymn.gov>, Andy Snope <asnoye j,goldenvalleymn.gov> Subject: Residential Subdivision Moratorium September 14, 2014 Members of the Golden Valley City Council: We are following up on our letter of last week that expressed our concerns about recent and planned residential subdivisions and their negative impact on Golden Valley neighborhoods. Thank you for your support of a moratorium while the City conducts a community-based study of potential changes in the City's Zoning Code. We understand that Tuesday evening the Council will continue its discussion of the moratorium and its implementation. We believe several things are critically important for the Council to consider. First, the study must be thoughtful, comprehensive, and community-based, actively involving neighborhoods and citizens. The study cannot be rushed nor done half- heartedly. Second, we believe that it is important that the moratorium be immediate and as inclusive as possible, including those properties that may be part way through the approval process such as 200 Meadow Lane. We realize that may be inconvenient for some home owners and developers. That inconvenience, however, is temporary, pending the completion of the comprehensive study. Some of the proposed subdivisions may, of course, not meet the new requirements that the study might propose. Moving ahead with the residential subdivisions currently in the pipeline can never be undone. The impact on neighborhoods will be forever. Temporary inconvenience versus permanent impact? The decision seems quite straight forward. If some homeowners and developers threaten legal action, that frankly is the cost of preserving the neighborhoods of Golden Valley. We want to be clear that we are not against new development in our residential neighborhoods. Golden Valley's neighborhoods and housing stock are aging, and it is critical that we maintain them. Golden Valley has, in fact, adopted and enforces one of the strictest building codes in the Twin Cities to ensure that homes and properties are maintained. That is good. There is also a long history of neighborhood renewal in Golden Valley and we support that. Older houses are being renovated all the time. Some houses well past their useful lives are torn down and replaced by newer structures. That is good too. What is important, however, is that when houses are torn down,the houses replacing them must respect the fundamental character of the neighborhood—the diversity of architecture, the open spaces and modest density of neighborhoods, the green lawns and old trees of Golden Valley, and those other intangible factors that make Golden Valley such a wonderful place to live. With only a few notable exceptions,that has been the history and tradition of renewal in Golden Valley until the recent spate of residential subdivisions. We have much to learn from our past as well as from the mistakes currently being made in many neighborhoods in Minneapolis and St. Paul. We urge you to extend the moratorium and to begin the community-based study immediately. Doing so will preserve the best of Golden Valley and position the City well for the future. Terry Bock and Thomas Hoffmann 300 Ardmore Drive Golden Valley, Minnesota 55422 From: Herder, Pamela EIE Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 12:17 AM SEP 16 2014 To: Harris, Shep Subject: Single family subdivision I understand that the Council will be considering a six month moratorium on approving applications for subdividing single family parcels Tuesday. My father lived in a small home on a one acre lot surrounded by large homes on .25-.3 acre lots. His home is 62 years old and needs to be razed. My father died July 7, 2014 of lung cancer at 100 years old. His wish was to die at home. It was very costly to support his choice. I removed all of the monies from my 401 K to honor his wish in order to pay for home care providers, various medical procedures that Medicare denied, delivery of meals, lawn care etc. I am now near retirement myself with no monies in my 401 K. I relied on various emails and discussions with the individuals in the City Planning Department that there should be no barriers to subdividing my father's property. If I am unable to subdivide his property, builders are not interested in purchasing the property. I relied on the words of the City Planners to my detriment if the moratorium is approved. I cannot afford to carry his home through the winter not can afford to pay the remainder of his bills. If you decide on a moratorium, please give the community plenty of notice, meaning the moratorium should commence next Spring. If you commence the moratorium immediately, you will be financially devastating those of us who made significant financial sacrifices relying on the words of the City Planners. Thank you. Please forward to members of City Council. Pamela Herder (108 brunswick avenue north) Sent from my iPhone From: "Abramson, Norman M> ECEIE Date: September 15, 2014 at 4:29:51 PM CDT SEP 16 2014 To: "'sharris(D-goldenvalleymn.gov"' <sharris�D-goldenvalleymn.gov>, "'jclausen �goldenvalleymn.aov"' <iclausen(a-goldenvalleymn.gov>, BY: "'Ifonnest(D_goldenvalleymn.gov"' <Ifonnest(_)goldenvalleymn.gov> Cc: 'MARK S DIETZ' Subject: 200 Meadow Lane subdivision Dear Golden Valley City Council members who have expressed interest in a moratorium: I live at 212 Sunnyridge Circle, which is about 100 yards from the 200 Meadow Lane block. I previously wrote to the Council on August 28, 2014 in support of a moratorium on new subdivisions and to stop the new proposed subdivision on the "200 Meadow Lane block." I now write in advance of the September 16, 2014 open meeting in support of the moratorium you will be considering at that meeting and to include the new subdivision on the 200 Meadow Lane block within the scope of the moratorium. I am pleased the Council will consider a moratorium on new subdivisions until after it has time to create a development plan that weighs the impact and value of these subdivisions on the neighborhood. As a part of the Council's study over the next six months, I hope that it will consider changing the minimum lot size for any new subdivisions as increased minimum lot sizes would address many of the concerns our neighbors have expressed and would be relatively simply for the City staff to enforce. Our Tyrol Hills neighborhood strongly supports the creation of a thoughtful development plan before any additional subdivisions are imposed on our neighborhood. am, however, disappointed that the Council has indicated that it may not apply the moratorium to recently proposed subdivision on the 200 Meadow Lane block. The most recent proposal to subdivide 200 Meadow Lane block creates two new subdivisions on the same block, with three additional houses, and completely alters the forested nature of that block. I appreciate that the Council would not stop developments that have been formally platted and are far along in their implementation. However, the failure to apply the moratorium to developments that were just recently proposed contradicts the very purpose of a moratorium. The Council should apply the moratorium to any new subdivision proposals made in the last month or give the public concrete reasons why the Council will not do so. The Council must acknowledge that the issues of changing lot sizes and a moratorium have been discussed for several months. When the Council was asked to revise the zoning code to accommodate new subdivisions by eliminating the requirement of a minimum lot width, several neighbors proposed that if the lot width requirement was to be removed, it could be replaced with a larger minimum lot size, which would be an easier requirement for the City to administer. I wrote the Council at that time to support the larger lot size as a compromise. I was thanked for my comments and told that Council members were concerned with the number of new subdivisions. The Council ultimately chose to address the developer's concerns by removing the minimum lot width, but deferred the neighborhood's concerns regarding the new subdivisions and lot size. There is no reason to not have the moratorium relate back to genesis of these discussions. To allow these subdivisions to go through because preliminary papers were filed in the last weeks— as oppose to assessing the subdivisions against the plan the Council will develop during the moratorium period creates the strong possibility that subdivisions will be created that are not in the best A interest of Tyrol Hills. Imagine if the Council approved subdivisions that six months later are found to be inconsistent with the long term comprehensive plan for Tyrol Hills. The City shouldn't allow something now that in six months it may find inappropriate. More importantly, any errors now cannot be corrected in six months. After the mature trees, wildlife and privacy the existing homeowners have known for decades are bulldozed, there is no way to recreate the uniqueness of the 200 Meadow Lane block or this community. It is also my understanding that the planning commission addressed the new 200 Meadow Lane subdivision only last week and questioned whether they should withhold consideration of it until the council decided whether or not to implement its moratorium. The planning commission is an advisory body to this Council. If the planning commission can consider whether to apply the moratorium to existing plans last week, the Council surely can this week. I am also concerned that Council members have informed several neighbors that it cannot apply a moratorium to existing proposals. Has the City Attorney confirmed that it is impossible to apply a moratorium to a recently proposed project? If not, the Council should have its attorney clearly lay out all of the Council's options with regard to the moratorium's scope. A review of Minnesota Statute § 462.355, subd. 4 shows it does not have any express language preventing a moratorium from applying to a recently filed subdivision application: Interim ordinance. (a) If a municipality is conducting studies or has authorized a study to be conducted or has held or has scheduled a hearing for the purpose of considering adoption or amendment of a comprehensive plan or official controls as defined in section 462.352, subdivision 15.... the governing body of the municipality may adopt an interim ordinance applicable to all or part of its jurisdiction for the purpose of protecting the planning process and the health, safety and welfare of its citizens. The interim ordinance may regulate, restrict, or prohibit any use, development, or subdivision within the jurisdiction or a portion thereof for a period not to exceed one year from the date it is effective. Cases have allowed cities to impose temporary moratoriums to existing proposals, as long as they are not "unreasonable, arbitrary or capricious." Pawn America Minnesota, LLC V. St. Louis Park, 787 N.W.2d 565, 572 (Minn. 2010). In Duncanson v. Board of Supervisors of Danville Township, 551 N.W.2d, 248 (Minn. Ct. App. 1996), the city enacted a moratorium on a feed lot a month after learning of the project. The district court held that the township acted appropriately in issuing a moratorium but held that the moratorium could not be applied to the existing proposal. The Court of Appeals affirmed that the moratorium was lawfully imposed, but reversed the district court and applied the moratorium to the existing proposal as the moratorium was reasonable as it allowed the board to impose zoning laws to address "the growth and quality of the community for an indefinite period in the future." Id. at 251. The Council has a reasonable basis for imposing a moratorium—it wants to study the impact of new subdivisions and whether additional or revised ordinances are needed. The question for the Council should not be whether an application was filed, but whether the proposed destruction of forested space to make three new smaller lots is consistent with the City's long term plans for Tyrol Hills and the concerns of the neighborhood. There is no dispute that if the Council imposed the moratorium only a few weeks earlier when the Council was deadlocked 2 to 2 with one absence that the second subdivision for the 200 Meadow Lane block would have been subject to the moratorium. To allow that new proposal to be exempt from the moratorium under these circumstances would be unreasonable and arbitrary. While cases have held that moratoriums can be issued too late to stop individual projects, those projects already had their preliminary platting approved. See Semler Construct. v. City of Hanover, 667 N.W.2d 457, 462 (Minn. Ct. App. 2003)(defining preliminary platting as including, among other things, beginning the grading of the land and installing infrastructure). Here, the platting has not occurred and, to our understanding, the lot developer has not even closed on the purchase of the property. The goal should not be to help the developer out as the Planning Committee apparently said, but to insure we have the right development. It is perfectly reasonable and appropriate to include such a new project within the scope of the moratorium, especially given that the moratorium is only six months. The Council should carefully review all its options with regard to the scope of the moratorium and then decide if the unplatted new subdivision on the 200 Meadow Lane block, which was publicly unveiled in the last few weeks, should proceed during the moratorium. We think it should not. Thank you for your consideration. From: MARK S DIETZ � Inv= Date: September 15, 2014 at 2:55:17 PM CDT To: "sharris(a�goldenvalleymn.gov" <sharrisa-goldenvalleymn.gov>, SEP j 2014 "j clausena-goldenvalleymn.gov" <iclausen(a�goldenvalleymn.gov>, Sy; "Ifonnest(cD-goldenvalleymn.gov" <Ifonnest _goldenvalleymn.gov>, "sschmidgall(cD-goldenvalleymn.gov" <sschmidgall(Dgoidenvallevmn.gov>, "asnope(D-goldenvalleymn.gov" <asnopea-goldenvalleymn.gov> Subject: Petition to impose the subdivision moratorium in North Tyrol and including the proposed 200 Meadow Lane Subdivision Dear Mayor Harris and City Council Members: I am following up on my letter of 2 weeks ago which expressed North Tyrol residents' concerns about the planned residential subdivision at 200 Meadow Lane. We are writing to express our sincere thanks for your support of a moratorium on residential subdivisions in Golden Valley. We, in the North Tyrol community, appreciate your careful consideration of the appropriate lot sizes necessary to preserve the beautiful, spacious and wooded character of the Sunnyridge/Meadow Lane neighborhood. Our community is unique with its natural beauty, privacy and proximity to downtown Minneapolis, which is why many of us chose to buy and reside here for many years. Attached to this letter is a petition, which has been circulated to and signed by over 150 homeowners, urging you to please act now to table the most recent additional request to subdivide 200 Meadow Lane North— before the damage is done. Taking the time to study the issue and determine if additional rules need to be imposed will ensure future subdivisions will be in line with your strategic plan for what Golden Valley will be in the future, increased lot size, conservation of mature trees which are native to the Wirth Park area and appropriate green space. Since the Council indicated it would consider a moratorium some two months ago, we are very disappointed to learn more subdivisions (200 Meadow Lane) have been applied for and might be considered before the imposition of a moratorium. To allow the 200 Meadow Lane subdivision project to be exempt from the moratorium would be unreasonable and unfair to our neighborhood and residents. I note the City's Planning Commission last week raised whether the 200 Meadow Lane North subdivision should be deferred until the Council decided the moratorium issue. The Planning Commission chose not to wait for the Council to act on the moratorium so as "to not hold up the developer." The very purpose of a moratorium is to hold taking permanent action until it is decided if this is action that is in the best interest of the City. However, if the Planning Commission has the authority to stop a subdivision, the Council certainly does too. We (the North Tyrol neighborhood) are requesting your support to apply the moratorium on new subdivisions, particularly 200 Meadow Lane, which has been filed since City Council's original moratorium discussion. Thanks you for your support of our North Tyrol neighborhood and its long-term existing residents. Respectfully submitted, Mark S. Dietz 207 Sunnyridge Lane North Golden Valley Minnesota 55422-5315 Thanks and have a great day. REQUEST TO IMPOSE MORTORIUM ON NEIN SUBDIVISIONS I support the City Council of Golden Valley's changing the Tyrol Hills'neighborhood minimum lot size for any future subdivisions of existing lots to a lot size greater than the present 10,000 square feet. I further support the Council staying its consideration of any new subdivisions before it addresses whether the minimum lot size in Tyrol Hills should be greater than 10,000 square feet. As a resident of Tyrol Hills, a detailed analysis by the Council,with input from the neighborhood,of what should be the appropriate minimum lot size is important to me,given our neighborhood's history,wildlife,environment and appeal. Since the Council indicated that it would consider a moratorium in the future, I am disappointed to learn that more subdivisions have been applied for and might be considered before the imposition of a moratorium. NAME ADDRESS Veal 141'61,�r �; �� ,� ve,,4U6 1- 'Illn& A4 l WZW , o io , VT i A Iz2LIZ A 11;,L C 1 ac Soo REQUEST TO IMPOSE MORTORIUM ON NEW SUBDIVISIONS 1 support the City Council of Golden Valley's changing the Tyrol Hills' neighborhood minimum lot size for any future subdivisions of existing lots to a lot size greater than the present 10,000 square feet. I further support the Council staying its consideration of any new subdivisions before it addresses whether the minimum lot size in Tyrol Hills should be greater than 10,000 square feet. As a resident of Tyrol Hills,a detailed analysis by the Council,with input from the neighborhood,of what should be the appropriate minimum lot size is important to me,given our neighborhood's history,wildlife,environment and appeal. Since the Council indicated that it would consider a moratorium in the future,I am disappointed to learn that more subdivisions have been applied for and might be considered before the imposition of a moratorium. NAME ADDRESS gs�vltrl RAA, 2221 ,u. CDQr l � gr35' tekei- A?Lc 4�Alo�rpa.�. 1 ' ntrsr�e �h. alrk w r �. 'YV 14-1 1 Wipf,+tAlao d Aso-on s� 260 Wesiw«:d a. IV . Sk e 1 d-y,. ! ,, Aenmoa 4- �t1. 4\ rzj� S�a n no .101 Or Ak) U)?k a& Die �56waxh�� 1;�Cw)w Oat to /0 WiY REQUEST TO IMPOSE MORTORIUM ON NEW SUBDIVISIONS I support the City Council of Golden Valley's changing the Tyrol Hills'neighborhood minimum lot size for any future subdivisions of existing lots to a lot size greater than the present 10,000 square feet. I further support the Council staying its consideration of any new subdivisions before it addresses whether the minimum lot size in Tyrol Hills should be greater than 10,000 square feet. As a resident of Tyrol Hills, a detailed analysis by the Council,with input from the neighborhood,of what should be the appropriate minimum lot size is important to me,given our neighborhood's history,wildlife,environment and appeal. Since the Council indicated that it would consider a moratorium in the future,I am disappointed to learn that more subdivisions have been applied for and might be considered before the imposition of a moratorium. NAME ADDRESS k�A imli Z"'1'4 �zGl D D c C REQUEST TO IMPOSE MORTORIUM ON NEW SUBDIVISIONS I support the City Council of Golden Valley's changing the Tyrol Hills' neighborhood minimum lot size for any future subdivisions of existing lots to a lot size greater than the present 10,000 square feet. I further support the Council staying its consideration of any new subdivisions before it addresses whether the minimum lot size in Tyrol Hills should be greater than 10,000 square feet. As a resident of Tyrol Hills,a detailed analysis by the Council,with input from the neighborhood,of what should be the appropriate minimum lot size is important to me,given our neighborhood's history,wildlife,environment and appeal. Since the Council indicated that it would consider a moratorium in the future,I am disappointed to learn that more subdivisions have been applied for and might be considered before the imposition of a moratorium. NAME ADDRESS O-L&id ( mrJ M .3-IV til l 6o t-j Ltj rJ 6L1. A d4- Jl� M(7ddCru (N N 6V LT t�a-w '\,NSA t r�� Ll 1 AY M N3 1A 6", c. Z / Z IcJ� Ic-%Iffid!z�/110,%-A- -3 )&d�6c-,Lv . REQUEST TO IMPOSE MORTORIUM ON NEW SUBDIVISIONS I support the City Council of Golden Valley's changing the Tyrol Hills'neighborhood minimum lot size for any future subdivisions of existing lots to a lot size greater than the present 10,000 square feet. I further support the Council staying its consideration of any new subdivisions before it addresses whether the minimum lot size in Tyrol Hills should be greater than 10,000 square feet. As a resident of Tyrol Hills,a detailed analysis by the Council,with input from the neighborhood,of what should be the appropriate minimum lot size is important to me,given our neighborhood's history,wildlife,environment and appeal. Since the Council indicated that it would consider a moratorium in the future,I am disappointed to learn that more subdivisions have been applied for and might be considered before the imposition of a moratorium. NAME ADDRE S S 9) 5i� ,�/ latl G ly _ a //p41, - A•- �" S v nn�, tom, Cd- L ! -Q NCA+0 b � l r r r r -y-2- L.d; 7- z-2-0 5Lt Nnt Y 2 /c" ,� L 11J. `�► -� Z � v Q r LtAYV9�0 6A��,j50,� 9UN01) 2- (JA-/ 44 L I Z -le✓ - a REQUEST TO IMPOSE MORTORIUM ON NEW SUBDIVISIONS I support the City Council of Golden Valley's changing the Tyrol Hills'neighborhood minimum lot size for any future subdivisions of existing lots to a lot size greater than the present 10,000 square feet. I further support the Council staying its consideration of any new subdivisions before it addresses whether the minimum lot size in Tyrol Hills should be greater than 10,000 square feet. As a resident of Tyrol Hills,a detailed analysis by the Council,with input from the neighborhood,of what should be the appropriate minimum lot size is important to me,given our neighborhood's history,wildlife,environment and appeal. Since the Council indicated that it would consider a moratorium in the future,I am disappointed to learn that more subdivisions have been applied for and might be considered before the imposition of a moratorium. NAME ADDRESS ARE 2 I A/ Q 3C-) SLI a J LA ilm r ;d a L n sin n dop Ln �r� c-, i! c�: _jC j r 1 l t� REQUEST TO IMPOSE MORTORIUM ON NEIN SUBDIVISIONS I support the City Council of Golden Valley's changing the Tyrol Hills'neighborhood minimum lot size for any future subdivisions of existing lots to a lot size greater than the present 10,000 square feet. I further support the Council staying its consideration of any new subdivisions before it addresses whether the minimum lot size in Tyrol Hills should be greater than 10,000 square feet. As a resident of Tyrol Hills,a detailed analysis by the Council,with input from the neighborhood,of what should be the appropriate minimum lot size is important to me,given our neighborhood's history,wildlife,environment and appeal. Since the Council indicated that it would consider a moratorium in the future,I am disappointed to learn that more subdivisions have been applied for and might be considered before the imposition of a moratorium. NAME ADDRESS r , {3Y '�, 1 L� GINI i'i L 14,210 h4,0rve c, 6) Alk A!AWji� IX �V C 016 VJw�,---4 A� LdLIL 1 4 V 1, L 2 ? ig-ue4 &—e- F YVA S f�� foo Lk i `�I � REQUEST TO IMPOSE MORTORIUM ON NEW SUBDIVISIONS I support the City Council of Golden Valley's changing the Tyrol Hills'neighborhood minimum lot size for any future subdivisions of existing lots to a lot size greater than the present 10,000 square feet. I further support the Council staying its consideration of any new subdivisions before it addresses whether the minimum lot size in Tyrol Hills should be greater than 10,000 square feet. As a resident of Tyrol Hills,a detailed analysis by the Council,with input from the neighborhood,of what should be the appropriate minimum lot size is important to me,given our neighborhood's history,wildlife,environment and appeal. Since the Council indicated that it would consider a moratorium in the future, I am disappointed to learn that more subdivisions have been applied for and might be considered before the imposition of a moratorium. NAME ADDRESS esCI�- 14 Alt4 14A/k,) 2* 2\Alz) A--41 14 ..-. w z - Sa-c.1�1 1 O f MtG*cw CAVE S, 0 G, to o 6- TO 1 61 e 65—rr v� Y0 0 ke ctyC REQUEST TO IMPOSE MORTORIUM ON NEW SUBDIVISIONS 1 support the City Council of Golden Valley's changing the Tyrol Hills' neighborhood minimum lot size for any future subdivisions of existing lots to a lot size greater than the present 10,000 square feet. I further support the Council staying its consideration of any new subdivisions before it addresses whether the minimum lot size in Tyrol Hills should be greater than 10,000 square feet. As a resident of Tyrol Hills,a detailed analysis by the Council,with input from the neighborhood,of what should be the appropriate minimum lot size is important tome,given our neighborhood's history,wildlife,environment and appeal. Since the Council indicated that it would consider a moratorium in the future,I am disappointed to learn that more subdivisions have been applied for and might be considered before the imposition of a moratorium. NAME ADDRESS 1 -bm lame- , CR4( U4%x# ) (mo 6V 'x'ht? Ct1 7 W IJJ ( MAI 05�i2 Sao � w &V Ssy-20 , L� -Z YO " V--%)3j Nnv\vr-lcr til I �s7— KFadoU r ; - .A ,r- Ri , HA J). /7,'/ P"i-e Le's C Al G 3 REQUEST TO IMPOSE MORTORIUM ON NEW SUBDIVISIONS I support the City Council of Golden Valley's changing the Tyrol Hills'neighborhood minimum lot size for any future subdivisions of existing lots to a lot size greater than the present 10,000 square feet. I further support the Council staying its consideration of any new subdivisions before it addresses whether the minimum lot size in Tyrol Hills should be greater than 10,000 square feet. As a resident of Tyrol Hills,a detailed analysis by the Council,with input from the neighborhood,of what should be the appropriate minimum lot size is important to me,given our neighborhood's history,wildlife,environment and appeal. Since the Council indicated that it would consider a moratorium in the future,I am disappointed to learn that more subdivisions have been applied for and might be considered before the imposition of a moratorium. NAME ADDRESS a 47 t � t REQUEST TO IMPOSE MORTORIUM ON NEW SUBDIVISIONS I support the City Council of Golden Valley's changing the Tyrol Hills'neighborhood minimum lot size for any future subdivisions of existing lots to a lot size greater than the present 10,000 square feet. I further support the Council staying its consideration of any new subdivisions before it addresses whether the minimum lot size in Tyrol Hills should be greater than 10,000 square feet. As a resident of Tyrol Hills,a detailed analysis by the Council,with input from the neighborhood, of what should be the appropriate minimum lot size is important to me,given our neighborhood's history,wildlife,environment and appeal. Since the Council indicated that it would consider a moratorium in the future, l am disappointed to learn that more subdivisions have been applied for and might be considered before the imposition of a moratorium. NAME ADDRESS REQUEST TO IMPOSE MORTORIUM ON NEW SUBDIVISIONS I support the City Council of Golden Valley's changing the Tyrol Hills'neighborhood minimum lot size for any future subdivisions of existing lots to a lot size greater than the present 10,000 square feet. I further support the Council staying its consideration of any new subdivisions before it addresses whether the minimum lot size in Tyrol Hills should be greater than 10,000 square feet. As a resident of Tyrol Hills,a detailed analysis by the Council,with input from the neighborhood,of what should be the appropriate minimum lot size is important to me,given our neighborhood's history,wildlife,environment and appeal. Since the Council indicated that it would consider a moratorium in the future, I am disappointed to learn that more subdivisions have been applied for and might be considered before the imposition of a moratorium. NAME ADDRESS VYV� V� . �9`.. ., I� � � Planning Department 763-593-8095/763-593-8109(fax) ,r,: .., i�.�., :n"�'�x, .«s�uUl ,..�.'Xm�u�. ..�N`. .�,di�.., �YM.�s '�2;��ip0'�i5t .^��'`'.'. f�ll�nii'lid .��.:�ku� .i:�.�4�... ,.'�'ri""_ :�. .,'uhtr�.�� .-��;.ii'ifl ....."'�'/N.r,.�, .��8up��K„ .-.'��. .,.�,,-�_..�e".o: Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting September 16, 2014 60 day deadline: September 8, 2014 60 day extension: November 7, 2014 Agenda Item 4. A. Public Hearing-Approval of Conditional Use Permit 137 - 601 Boone Avenue North - TruStone Financial, Applicant Prepared By Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager Summary TruStone Financial is proposing to construct a new building at 601 Boone Avenue North to house a credit union. The financial use is permitted within the Commercial zoning district, but a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) is required to allow the use of three drive-thru lanes. The proposed facility would be one story and approximately 5,555 square feet with a 1,000 square foot drive-up canopy. Futl site access would be available via 7th Avenue and "right-in right-out" access is proposed for Boone Avenue. 19 parking spaces are required based on the size of the building; 31 are proposed. A CUP to construct a similar project was approved in 2008, but was not constructed. An extension through September 2, 2010, was granted by the City Council but as that date has passed without activity, the CUP is no longer valid and a new permit must be obtained. At the August 25, 2014, Planning Commission meeting, the Commission voted 4-0 to recommend approval of the proposal. Specifically, the Commission felt the proposed use was in compliance with the ten factors in the City Code that determine the eligibility of a conditional use, subject to the following conditions: 1. The plans by HTG Architects submitted on July 10, 2014, shall become a part of this approval. 2. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from Fire Chief John Crelly to Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager, dated August 18, 2014, shall become part of this approval. 3. A bicycle rack shall be added to the property providing for a minimum of four spaces. 4. All signage must meet the requirements of the City's Sign Code (Section 4.20). 5. This approval is subject to all other state, federal, and local ordinances, regulations, or laws with authority over this development. Attachments • Location Map (1 page) • Planning Commission Minutes dated August 25, 2014 (3 pages) • Memo to Planning Commission dated August 25, 2014 (3 pages) • Memo from Fire Chief John Crelly dated August 18, 2014 (1 page) • Applicant's Narrative (2 pages) • Letter from MnDOT dated September 8, 2014 (2 pages) • Site Plan (1 page) • Floor Plan (1 page) • Site Rendering (1 page) • Ordinance#528, Approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 137, 601 Boone Avenue North, TruStone Financial, Applicant (2 pages) Recommended Action Motion to adopt Ordinance #528, Approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 137, 601 Boone Avenue North,TruStone Financial, Applicant. , 730 730 - • 701 710 - _ _... . . ,i �. 201� 111��z' 1048 101 884(883F883�883(882�881t88168872880E8804 � 2� Z �1C109 105` 103 1p2� 88368832~ ! � �8820. 8814� •8808 Subject Property� ` � � �107103A! � - �i 2� 601 Boone Ave. N. ��205A a 8800 > { 700 = rth Avt N • � �8 525 � C Z 300 8845 c 600 � �100 8900 • 6� � � - �200� • a �' , c 9000 8806 ° :• • � � 600 1 ��,M... . ,.�-" +5c�cten Va��c�y F;a .�,,..""''8685 �,..,,,,.�...,,^.^"" . � -- - ,-�.._.. �,,,,,....��_._,_.• _,.. , .,�-" 8950 - - - . w �� ,..-„""' r�°' � --" • �y,. s_ . � ��,S,tt�l�� ., ,�4:y N� �5 . �,, __. � , , ....--�'"'"�..�.- ��rr"'""�. .. .. .. ..-< `N"y in`ot�� 8815 a_ � .S,P> ._ ��f, � � � �"� 439 Z 4� �� f 424 a a� 8945 q z 8951 • � 433 � 433 4 <_ ^ 432 y8811 � �, = , �' 42 3 . - 424 ' -024' .,�,� c *s Minutes of the Goiden Valley Planning Commission August 25, 2014 Page 3 Kluchka questioned if it is fair to say tha he Planning Commission asked that the property tine be straightened, when they didn't k w about the rear yard versus sid�..�d issue. ��y, Wal�^ � , r stated that the lot line coul� be re-drawn and thcr.�would not be a backyard on Lot 1 at all. �~� " \ �� ,�� --=- ' Segelbaum said he is conc�rr�ed abou ' �ng a precedent in how the Planning Commission interprets this iss�a� '� ow future proposals would use it going forward. ��%''�� .� Kluchka said he is not ir�-agreement wi� c�rFli.n the interior lot line a rear yard property line. Blum agreed, and r '�rated that this p, posal��t like the pie shaped examples they were shown, becaus ` ey clearly start as parallel side'�c�t,lines. ., . ��,.� ��u MOV y Segelbaum, seconded by lum and motion carried 3��i recommend denial o preliminary plat amendment. Co missioner Waldhauser voted no. 3. Informal Public Hearing — Conditional Use Permit— 601 Boone Avenue North — TruStone Financial — CU-137 Applicant: TruStone Financial Address: 601 Boone Avenue North Purpose: To allow the applicant to operate a new credit union with three drive- thru lanes in the Commercial zoning district. Zimmerman stated that the applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) in order to operate a new credit union with three drive-thru lanes. He noted that a CUP was approved for this location in 2008, but the project was not constructed, so a new CUP is now required. He referred to a site plan and explained the applicants request to construct a one-story building with three drive-thru lanes located on the southeast corner of the building. He stated that 19 parking spaces are required, and the applicant is proposing 31 spaces. He added that based on the review of the application, and the evaluation of the factors listed in the Zoning Code, staff is recommending approval of the proposed CUP. Kluchka asked if there are any material differences between this proposal and the proposal approved in 2008. Zimmerman stated that the building is slightly smaller in this proposal. Waldhauser asked if conditions could be added regarding landscaping and drainage. Zimmerman stated that Conditional Use Permits really only consider the land use. Waldhauser noted that there seems to be a lot of signage proposed. Zimmerman stated that they will be required to follow the City's sign code requirements. Kluchka asked about snow storage on the site. Zimmerman suggested the applicant address that issue, but he assumes snow would be stored on the south side of the site. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission August 25, 2014 Page 4 Segelbaum noted that the first finding is the demonstrated need for the proposed use. He asked if that is pertaining only to the drive-thru windows, or the entire use. Zimmerman said it pertains to the entire use. Sean Raboin, HTG Architects, stated that the proposed new building will be slightly smaller than the one proposed in 2008. He stated that this should be a good fit, and a nice use for this property. He referred to the question regarding snow storage and stated that snow will be stored on the north part of the site, or it will be hauled off-site. Waldhauser asked if the applicant feels that they need as much parking as they are proposing. Raboin said yes, and added that this will be a very busy location. Segelbaum asked why they need to have three drive-thru lanes. Raboin stated that 10 years ago four or five drive-thru lanes was typical, but now banks like to have two drive- up windows and one drive-up ATM. Blum asked how the parking at this property compares with the parking at their current location. Raboin stated that they have more parking at their current facility, but it is a much larger building. Segelbaum asked if the applicant will continue to use their existing facility. Raboin said no. Kluchka asked if the timing of this project is related to the Douglas Drive reconstruction project. Raboin said he didn't know, but he thinks the economy has played a part as well. Kluchka opened the public hearing. Steve Schmidgall, 6534 Olympia Street, said he hopes there will be very little EIFS used and if so, not at grade, so it will continue to look good. Seeing and hearing no one else wishing to comment, Kluchka closed the public hearing. Kluchka said he knows this will be a busy location. He suggested that the applicant bring elevations and a material list to the City Council meeting. Segelbaum stated that more drive-thru lanes would also mean fewer cars stacking. Waldhauser said the proposal looks reasonable. She said she hopes some landscaping could be done along Highway 55, and that run-off from the parking lot could be captured in rain gardens, or some other system. MOVED by Blum, seconded by Waldhauser and motion carried unanimously to recommend approval of the Conditional Use Permit at 601 Boone Avenue North to allow a credit union with three drive-thru lanes in the Commercial zoning district subject to the following findings and conditions: Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission August 25, 2014 Page 5 Findinas: 1. TruStone will be relocating from their current location at 6500 Olson Memorial Highway and will likely maintain if not grow their existing base of customers. 2. A financial institution is consistent with the Commercial designation of this property on the General Land Use Plan Map. 3. Staff anticipates the newly constructed building would not have a negative impact on the surrounding properties. In fact, the addition of a quality building to the vacant site is anticipated to have a positive effect. 4. As part of the original submission in 2008, a traffic study was done for this use and anticipated no concerns. Since this proposal is a slightly scaled back version of the original plan, Staff does not expect any negative traffic impacts to the surrounding areas. 5. The proposed use would generate a minor increase in the number of employees at the location. 6. The proposed use is not anticipated to cause an increase in noise levels. 7. There would be some pollution caused by the idling of vehicles waiting to be served in the drive-thru lanes. Due to the surrounding land uses and the proximity to Highway 55, this increase would not be significant. 8. The proposed use is not anticipated to attract pests. 9. Based on the site plans submitted and the architectural design of other TruStone Financial buildings that will be used as models for this structure, the visual quality of the property will be enhanced. 10.Staff does not anticipate any other negative effects of the proposed use. The location is a commercial area with good access that can handle any additional traffic. Conditions: 1. The plans by HTG Architects submitted on July 10, 2014, shall become a part of this approval. 2. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from Fire Chief John Crelly to Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager, dated August 18, 2014, shall become part of this approval. 3. A bicycle rack shall be added to the property providing for a minimum of four spaces. 4. All signage must meet the requirements of the City's Sign Code (Section 4.20). 5. This approval is subject to all other state, federal, and local ordinances, regulations, or laws with authority over this development. 4.�Informal Public earing — Final Plan Review— Planned Unit Development �) — Carous I Automobiles (Porsch ,Dealership) PUD #95, Amendment#3 AppliC��t: Twi�f Cities. "motive (Porsche) .,�Fhh �,i/. l� Address: � ��1 and 9393 Wayzata Blvd. �� P pose: Tp constr�c,t.�a new Porsche facility on the west side of the property. I` � � Cl�� t�� t�:, C��G��YI �� E �� C� � � � �( 1� Plannin D e artm n ��,. �.'.� g p e t 763-593-8095/763-593-81 Q9(fax) Date: August 25, 2014 To: Golden Valley Planning Commission From: Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager Subject: Informal Public Hearing—Conditional Use Permit (CUP-137) to Allow for the Operation of a Credit Union with Drive-thru Lanes at 601 Boone Avenue North —TruStone Financial, Applicant . . .. , � . , � ..... . .. . .....�.�. ., _��„�._ �.,,�,.,,`� ,t� �t ,.�_�.� w.;��.�m,.�...,�:�.<,�°��"�;�.:�:�,;;��.��:�.��^��,��'� � Background and Proposed Use TruStone is proposing to construct a new building at 601 Boone Avenue North to house a credit union. The property is zoned Commercial and is guided for long-term Retail/Service use on the General Land Use Plan map. The financial use is permitted within this zoning district, but a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) is required to allow the use of three drive-thru lanes. The total lot area is 1.07 acres; it is bounded by Boone Avenue North to the west, 7th Avenue North to the north, and Highway 55 to the south. A Perkins restaurant is located on the lot to the west; the new Boone Avenue Convenience Center is located across Boone Avenue to the east. The proposed facility would be one story and approximately 5,555 square feet with a 1,000 square foot drive-up canopy. Full site access would be availabfe via 7th Avenue and "right-in right- out" access is proposed for Boone Avenue. 19 parking spaces are required based on the size of the building; 31 are proposed. A Conditional Use Permit to construct a similar project was approved in 2008 but was not constructed. An extension through September 2, 2010, was granted by the City Council but as that date has passed without activity,the CUP is no longer valid and a new permit must be obtained. Evaluation The findings and recommendations for a Conditional Use Permit are based upon any or all of the following factors: 1. Demonstrated Need for the Proposed Use:The City requires that an applicant identify a market for the proposed good or service necessitating a CUP. TruStone will be relocating from their current focation at 6500 Olson Memorial Highway and will likely maintain if not grow their existing base of customers. 2. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan: A financial institution is consistent with the Commercial designation of this property on the General Land Use Plan Map. 3. Effect on Property Values: Staff anticipates the newly constructed building would not have a negative impact on the surrounding properties. In fact, the addition of a quality building to the vacant site is anticipated to have a positive effect. 4. Effect on Traffic: As part of the original submission in 2008, a traffic study was done for this use and anticipated no concerns. Since this proposal is a slightly scaled back version of the original plan, Staff does not expect any negative traffic impacts to the surrounding areas. 5. Effect of Increases in Population and Density:The proposed use would generate a minor increase in the number of employees at the location. 6. Increase in Noise Levels: The proposed use is not anticipated to cause an increase in noise levels. 7. Impact of Dust, Odor, or Vibration:There would be some pollution caused by the idling of vehicles waiting to be served in the drive-thru lanes. Due to the surrounding land uses and the proximity to Highway 55, this increase would not be significant. 8. Impact of Pests: The proposed use is not anticipated to attract pests. 9. Visual Impact: Based on the site plans submitted and the architectural design of other TruStone Financial buildings that will be used as models for this structure, the visual quality of the property will be enhanced. 10. Other Impacts to the City and Residents: Staff does not anticipate any other negative effects of the proposed use. The location is a commercial area with good access that can handle any additional traffic. Recommended Action Staff recommends approval of Conditional Use Permit 137 allowing the construction of a credit union with drive-thru lanes at 601 Boone Avenue North. The approval of a Conditional Use Permit is subject to the following conditions: 1. The plans by HTG Architects submitted on July 10, 2014, shall become a part of this approval. 2. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from Fire Chief John Crelly to Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager, dated August 18, 2014, shall become part of this approval. 3. A bicycle rack shall be added to the property providing for a minimum of four spaces. 4. Al) signage must meet the requirements of the City's Sign Code (Section 4.20). 5. This approval is subject to all other state, federal, and local ordinances, regulations, or laws with authority over this development. Attachments Location Map (1 page) Applicant's Narrative (2 pages) Memo from Fire Chief John Crelly dated August 18, 2014 (1 page) Photographs of TruStone Buildings (2 pages) Site Plan (1 page) Floor Plans (1 page) City pf y� M e t'1'1 Ct t'c�t1 C� U rl'1 0 ell a e Fire Department F i r e D e p a r t m e n t 763-593-8065/763-593-80981fax1 To: Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager From: John Crelly, Fire Chief Subject: Conditional Use Permit—TruStone Financial Date: August 18, 2014 I have reviewed the conditional use permit information packet for the proposed TruStone Financial located at 601 Boone Avenue North that was submitted on July 11, 2014. It is my understanding that a conditional use permit is required based on the drive up canopy feature. The Golden Valley Fire Department reviewed the requirements of the Minnesota State Fire Code (MSFC) section 503.1 which details the need for when a Fire Department Access Road 20 foot wide by 13' 6" high drive lane around the building is required. Upon review it was determined that the fire department will NOT require a fire access road around the building. This conclusion is based on the fire departments ability to park a fire vehicle at the beginning of the drive-up lane on the northeast corner of the building and on the east side of the building and still be able to reach all portions of the building with 150 feet of host. Based on this conclusion, the height of the drive-up canopy and the narrow bypass aisle are NOT a concern. Moving forward the Fire Department will be reviewing site utility plans, building plans for compliance with MSFC and Building Code and fire sprinkler plans. If you have any questions, please contact me at 763-593-8065, or my e-mail address, jcrellySa�qoldenvalleymn�ov 10Ju1y2014 architects City of Golden Valley Planning Department Community Development Attn.: Jason Zimmerman—City Planner 7800 Golden Valley Road Golden Valley,MN 55427 Ph. (763)593-8099 Re: TruStone Financial Proposed New Building 601 Boone Avenue North Golden Valley, Minnesota Subject: Application for Conditional Use Permit Legal Golden Valley Industrial Park,Lot 1,Block 3 Description: PID#: 31-118-21-31-0016 Below is a brief summary of the proposed building design, image,and material selection. NARRATIVE eneral. TruStone Financial is proposing to construct a one-story facility located at 601 Boone Avenue North. TruStone would relocate from their existing location at 6500 Olson Memorial Highway. The existing property is currently zoned Commercial. A financial institution is allowed under this zoning. The existing property is currently vacant. The proposed building will consist of an approximately 5,555 square feet main level and an approximately 1,000 square foot drive-up canopy. The main level will contain the Credit Union's retail banking space(which includes offices,teller areas,conference room,waiting,etc.). Site ingress/egress is from one existing curb cut along 7th Avenue North(via Boone Avenue). A'Right-In/Right- Out'is proposed on the east side of the property along Boone Avenue. Site Plan The proposed building is centered on the site with member parking on the north side of the building. The main building entry is on the north side of the proposed building. TruStone Financial is proposing a three-lane drive- up; located on the south/southeast side of the building. Each drive-up lane provides the required 4-car stacking. Employee parking is located on the south side of the building. The building meets all required building setback requirements. A total of 31 parking stalls are shown on the site. Based on the size ofthe building; 19 parking stalls are required. HTG ARCHITECTS 9300 Hennepin Town Road, Minneapolis MN 55347 (952) 278-8880 htg-architects.com MINNEAPOLIS PHOENIX TAMPA Sianage. A proposed pylon sign is shown in the southeast corner of the site(see site plan). The pylon sign design is meant to compliment the proposed building design. The pylon sign design has not been completed at this time. The size of the sign is yet to be determined-but will be conform to City Code. A two-sided monument sign is shown in the northeast corner of the site. The proposed building will also have back-lit wall signs; locations to be determined. Sizes shall meet City Code. Sign permits will be applied for by the Owner's signage vendor at a later date. Imaae• The design of the proposed building provides an image that is consumer friendly,warm,and elegant. The exterior materials reflect TruStone's corporate branding standards and are similar to their established prototype buildings in Maple Grove&Minneapolis. The exterior design will likely use the following materials: natural stone,eifs,prefinished composite metal panels,and glass. The mechanical equipment will be located on the roof and be screened by the building parapet. Materials. Building Entry Walls Prefinished composite metal panels Building Fa4ade Stone and eifs Roof/canopy overhangs Prefinished composite metal panels Roof EPDM Roofing Roof Structure Steel decking on barjoists Floor Structure Structural concrete slab(on pilings) Wall Structure Metal/steel stud framing with steel columns/beams The use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of the other properties. The establishment of the conditional use will not impede the normal and orderly development of the surrounding properties. Adequate utilities,access roads,drainage,etc.will be provided for this proposed building. The commercial use of this building is not in conflict with the city's comprehensive plan of this site. The preliminary schedule is for construction to begin in Fall of 2014 with an anticipated completion date in Spring of 2015. We feel the proposed TruStone Financial project will be and remain a tremendous asset to the neighborhood. Enclosed you will find the architectural site plan,interior floor plan,and photos of TruStone's Maple Grove building. Please call me with any questions. Sincerely, �� Russ Schramm Project Manager HTG ARCHITECTS 9300 Hennepin Town Road Minneapolis MN 55347 (952) 278-8880 www.htg-architects.com MINNEAPOLfS PHOENIX TAMPA ,�oa"'"ES°ry� Minnesota Department of Transportation '' o Metropolitan District �'�,�,. �,Q Waters Edge Building �f�P� 1500 County Road 62 West Roseville, MN 55113 September 8, 2014 Jason Zimmerman City of Golden Valley 7800 Golden Valley Road Golden Valley, MN 55427 SUBJECT: TruStone Financial—601 Boone Ave N MnDOT Review# 514-032 North of TH 55, East of US 169. Golden Valley, Hennepin County Control Section 2723 Dear Mr. Zimmerman: Thank you for the opportunity to review the TruStone Financial site plan. The Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) has reviewed the site plan and has the following comments: Traffic: The access on Boone is not recommended. This type of access in a turn lane near a signal is problematic as drivers entering the site are decelerating faster than expected and exiting drivers are weaving across multiple lanes of traffic. Suitable access is provided by the main access on 7th Avenue North. For questions concerning this comment, please contact Chad Erickson (chad.erickson(t�,state.mn.us or 651-234-7806) of MnDOT's West Area Traffic section. Permits: Any work impacting MnDOT right of way will require a permit. No portion of the development though can be constructed or maintained on MnDOT right of way. Permit forms are available from MnDOT's utility website at www.dot.state.mn.us/tecsup/utilitv. Please include one 11 x 17 plan set and one full size plan set with each permit application. Please direct any questions regarding permit requirements to Buck Craig (651-234-7911 or buck.crai�cr,state.mn.us) of MnDOT's Metro Permits Section. Review Submittal Options: MnDOT's goal is to complete the review of plans within 30 days. Submittals sent in electronically can usually be turned around faster. There are four submittal options. Please submit either: 1. One (1)electronic pdf. version of the plans. MnDOT can accept the plans via e-mail at metrodevreviews.dotna,statemn.us provided that each separate e- mail is under 20 megabytes. 2. Three (3) sets of full size plans. Although submitting seven sets of full size plans will expedite the review process. Plans can be sent to: MnDOT—Metro District Planning Section Development Reviews Coordinator 1500 West County Road B-2 Roseville, MN 55113 3. One (1) compact disc. 4. Plans can also be submitted to MnDOT's External FTP Site. Please send files to: ftp://ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/incoming/MetroWatersEd�e/Planning Internet Explorer doesn't work using ftp so please use an FTP Client or your Windows Explorer(My Computer). Also, please send a note to metrodevreviews.dot(a�state.mn.us indicating that the plans have been submitted on the FTP site. If you have any questions concerning this review, please contact me at 651-234-7793. Sincerely, J( .� � ,�� :� ,r , ' � J 4� . .+ i� . . �/ ~ ` � / � �,�,:'.��4'�' Y, �" i,-/�'� '' �_ l Michael J. Corbett, PE Senior Planner Copy sent via E-Mail: April Crockett, Area Manager Ramankutty Kannankutty, Area Engineer Brian Kelly, Water Resources Nancy Jacobson, Design Buck Craig, Permits Doug Nelson, Right-of-Way Chad Erickson, Traffic Engineering Clare Lackey, Traffic Engineering Russell Owen, Metropolitan Council 51TE PLAN NOTES: �oT ZON�NG: a r c h i t e c t s GOMMERGIAL T°T��°��.F'.: 7TH AVENUE. N. MAIN LEVEL 5,555 S.F. io•-o• �B'-o• DRIVE-UP GANOPY: I,000 S.F. 6sss S.F. www.htg-architects.com Minneopo/is Phoenix Tampa PAI2KING REQUIRED: '� —'��L��I�.�o. MAIN LEVEL: (SS55/300)= 185=19 STALLS � �ror+u�Erir � 9300 Hennepin Town Road E ��0 •�O Minneapolis,MN 55347 PARKIN6 SHOWN: =31 STALLS q� �O[�� Tel: 952.278.88a0 � �+y� O � Fax: 952.278.8622 PARKING STALL SIZE(9'-0"xl8'-6") is'-o' TOTAL LOT Al2EA 48,962 SF. I ______ _ i P R 0 J E C T BUILDIN6 FOOTPRINT 5,555 S.F. M ERVOUS SUR P.GE CAVE'RAGE 2�,502 S.F. ((46�f 11 � 9 o OOJ � TR USTONE BUILDING SETBAGKS FRONT-35' S1DE-20' REAR-20' ° F/NA NC/A L PARKIN6 SETBAGKS FRONT-35' S1DE-20' REAR-20' I 0 ME� o � I �� (IB-STALL51 - �► � 35'-0' SEtBAGK � � � i GOLDEN VALLEY 9'-p' ` i NEW BUILDING 74-0. ,�� o �� - - -- -- - ---- , 11 ' SETB/•LK 1 16.-p. MaN ; GOLDEN VALLEY,MINNESOTA EMrzY I ' � R16HT-IN/ � � � Ri6Ht-OUi ISSUED SET � ,, � � � REVISIONS PROPOSED O i ^ DATE N0. � BUILDING � � i � 5,555 SF. � -- 1 I l]'-3' � � EXIT � � -- g �Y / _- m • E1�iOYEE /S\,, � �I � _- I ENTRY . � __ � �i .� '�' �� w -- � F,� .�f�`, �t%� I � � � .'\�r ^''`��' /� lHEREBYCERtIFYTNAi1HI5FlAN.SVEdFICA�ION �GIEC. � +;� I GI ORREVOR�WASGREiARE09YMEORUNDERMY Vmsf. F � �1 OIRFGTSUVERVISION,ANO THATI AMApULY �a>� LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDERRIELAWSOFTHE �-$�I'� ``� 4.� w i StAiEOF MINNESOiA k23�=j1 �� 1 I � I O _ � OI � EMPLOYEE (131 PfLON I PARKIN6 �� /y� REG.NO. �ATE � (13-STALLS) O�� I Iya I � �� IS 0 I I �� i � �. °° .J � i ��— }C�w q �§ /' i ��. � �' I �. �" /' /" L_�� SITEPLAN � 0 55 0 G�wA`� j � DRAWN BY:AES. CHEIXED BV:SCA. / �j � /� , 51TE PLAN " " �� AI.I I"=20'-0" �an3s sFi3ins COPYRIGHT�BY HTG ARCHITECTS architects I www.htg-architects.com Minneapo/is Phoenix 7ampo � 9300 Hennepin Town Road � � � I Minneapolis,MN 55347 � � Tel: 952.278.8880 Fax: 952.278.8822 I IPROJECT � TR USTONE �=�-3 ( F/NA N�/A L __ ______ _ , jt , , � GOLDEN VALLEY �� ----� � � � � ; I NEW BUILDING �_��_��-� �,� - ----,- �--J----,- I i�. �x'��'Y y �S 9 � P�R�-�' �j,�e�nr�°eR��' � � �4�`ROOM�� J� - =-__ MANAC�ER EMRY g� _'l_J'i __`�J'� I .\ ', �' , _'� , -- I ' I �r��x'� -�� i, _�__ �, _�- � ��.�r�-a �,a�=;, � � �� ,� �..�z� �=y ; � GOLDfN VALLEY,MINNESOTA �� a---w o---- � � , INVESTtffM � � � �� a � I ISSUEDSET I -�,�� q�� r—, I REVi510N5 � � ,if�a� :�� K �_� I I I DATE N0. � i V,� rf- '�i AREAi y fi�9 ViA1TING �O � � I _" __'__ `--x� '� �� '` a2EA I� I I I � —_ ' � � ' '' e�� I nNEs�±v.�-`H ��, eoNu[� 'r.eY� fi�� r I I -- � MORT6A6E `�ST.. �i ��'i STATION � ��`� L_J I � - I LEt�ER ! cqnr�' T� rC. i I - � I � �',F�, ti a�__� _. �.rK� i�s� —— I �8�a� ;�� _;'� -- -'-�- .au I I I — 1 i �F � _______ yA%15tAN7� � __ � _-q'___y _ y„ _ ____= v<d'�>.d' MANPGFR � I I 1 _ _ ___ �� ,__ _{,�� ; ,_�.�_; , � , -- � 9 �f�i T i ��'�i� i�� 6 Producl A��i i��' � I , vEHIN6 '�y 5[ation � `��`T__�___'i I . W15EX R� �i BANKER O t__`'�___-____=_ � � I � _- 701LET `_______=-s____4 Lheck PERSOntnL I � DeSk BAW.ER � I � 4 °n�' ;F�, L � ` i F�� i�} �� HENEBYCERPFY]HAtMISFLAN,SPEClFICA1ION 11,i�� ' ��__��____� ONREfORiWA5PRF0AREOBYMEORVNDERMY L r LbJ 5.1 4.1 3.L2.�I.J ��i_S ' OIREC/SUPfRVISIOA;ANOTNATIAMAOULY LICENSEO ARCHIT£CT UNDEFTHElAW50FiHf l, 5� - f ----- STATFO£ MINNESOTA � VPLIT �/ I � �_ sroznr� b. ' � �, �--'n�n �*� �a.rio.�.�u�is. __�c�ie� k�. � — (� TRAN5AGTION fv. POD` I VYJFEN5 I�ENS wEG.NO. DATE iOILET • 7oILET � � \ � �/ �. � � 5[ttvHt `� � ROOM x� � HALL �/� �X � I Q � Iv. �� \ � \ I f5 coat5 rpD �� /� � .. mfrg. �� GASH �%f/ / ��\\�\\� I �� ROOM /� y/ ' N//�.� �' \ f�"ri Y"� �" L st�i / i� �\ �r ��%�,l('�\\"//� I .y-}11�1-�i MEGHJ \ IER � �ii � /�� \ "�� EMPLOYEE � lpM6E EE i I ELEL. � Y/ / \�'i ENTRY .F-�F-�fa• � % !� Yy \ _��d�_ r-��F��"�r--, � `� /'C \ �/� .. _ \) � �_��-��-; ,', �X� �' \\� ` � ,� MAINLEVELPLAN ,� � , , ;`^// \ � ,;' ��"��o��y ,' ,,�,�, K�`Xo I OPTION'2C' /�� \ ��i Xo /nTw. i i/�3 ,r* i ir ��/ �- .ni � �,rc \ i i� `. ;�il i � � �� '% /�° ij "�� i r . � .y i�g y i i si 0� Yi i� �� /�\�,��,y�� I < a �i �� i% ��T� 'y o � `/ � � yi o —� a �,� � �� u T�_—� 1-II a // � 1 � I � I II �d/ o DRAWN BY:RES. CHECKED BY:SCR. p 1 _� �II _ �-_�-=--_�y � I E _----__ AZ.Z � MAIN LEVEL PLAN - OPTION '2G' 1q7135 ML-141135 A2 I/8"=1'-0' SS55 S.F. COPYRIGHT m BY HTG ARCHITECTS E 0 V " .. �'h'+" � +�h ' « ' � S, W � Z;� t , _ �� i � ; `�M Z � �� _ F— . YA � r� ,'. y . . . "�" '., ".... . ��(�,J �¢ V�..�¢" �. � i .�i'. �. � � � � .:�»�....� �.._.�_e � A.. � �,f+�� . !. d 1 � .. . � �� .. • k , t� � }h��` � ��. • Y� W' " �^'^ .. .y �� ; �. .. : i F �.. .� t� j. _..,<: '�..�..� , '��" y� 77 4 � � ��rv �� r� . �`�._.`�� fr �� •1'r: �Pf � �s�� . � j� �i � ��r�,.'�c ¢�''. . . '' a�"ra, � �`w,. } y�. , .' � . , f ��, H q 3, I.�' ,x`��e � . � � � t � i �.�� 4 «� {'^; '�'�^ ��a � �a w � �a��, � .. r�y � � W `' 1 �^��..� �;� � s+Fy�, ��' ��ed» �; �`�u� p d jr ..,� � �. p�A} ; ...M1ka.�.� ,4`�. � ^'�� d � � ;a�., ��, � ' �..� :.}M�r d" ��^.� �w M19 �R*� i � . � �t w''wr��k.� t.�� {, �+�, ir,� � �'��F� F Pl•�'� ""�`"� � ��S . . ti t �� 9�` t�''� f°a � •f t.,,� l.�`, � � �.�� Ge�� re . � ��Y�j,�� ;�a�� C�C'�. `t� "� �' „ R� y 7'S �"�. w r � �`Q{f s�� " , ""p€ t�"� fi° I.i F* � �4" P f F�.,. � . �.. . . a , z . ..' w ., � �. �,. � Ii �F ��+�':� �) � " . . wy« u. �� h�to- �'e � � ��n— � � ��.. . m. ., _ �Y' ��+ ��i� �� R . .. . r.ur= � fy#'�:'_: r�,,. . . �.,�., . � ��li^ , . . .b I ��II kh'A1S � � ��i��ll �''�„ � �� i �:�;�_ �� x' `,. {, c; ,°�'�. . �' a A'r".. i�� d 4 �;�� LL � � � `. 4 . A �... 4 ?��i., . � . ��. 3 � �r �j � effi�'� � ��x , aA:,.. , � 7. �� . , �, _ __�tlii �„ t} ar�}, S�f'i � � �� . � � �i � Y � -' ..,.». , � � � �� IrM1� :s4> A < ..._ �11 w� `. '1 � �i . . ��,."�. ...�. 1 t _...___._. JI��. �,,. , � ,.�, � �� i .�i' A; � " � .' r, i t1 �� ( 1 � ��.: _ . ..._.... , .. , � .. ,.. ..._._ .� :�„� �� '�".��n.r' . d4 ��.x � ,. ��.,�. � � w�::�� „�� ORDINANCE NO. 528, 2ND SERIES AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE Approval of Conditional Use Permit Number 137 601 Boone Avenue North TruStone Financial, Applicant The City Council for the City of Golden Valley hereby ordains as follows: Section 1. City Code Chapter 11 entitled "Land Use Regulations (Zoning)" is amended in Section 11.10, Subd. 2, and Section 11.30, by approving a Conditional Use Permit for a certain tract of land at 601 Boone Avenue North, thereby allowing TruStone Financial to operate a credit union with three drive-thru lanes located in the Commercial Zoning District. This Conditional Use Permit is approved based on the findings of the Planning Commission pursuant to City Code Section 11.80, Subd. 2(G), which findings are hereby adopted and incorporated herein as follows: 1. TruStone will be relocating from their current location at 6500 Olson Memorial Highway and will likely maintain if not grow their existing base of customers. 2. A financial institution is consistent with the Commercial designation of this property on the General Land Use Plan Map. 3. Staff anticipates the newly constructed building would not have a negative impact on the surrounding properties. In fact, the addition of a quality building to the vacant site is anticipated to have a positive effect. 4. As part of the original submission in 2008, a traffic study was done for this use and anticipated no concerns. Since this proposal is a slightly scaled back version of the original plan, Staff does not expect any negative traffic impacts to the surrounding areas. 5. The proposed use would generate a minor increase in the number of employees at the location. 6. The proposed use is not anticipated to cause an increase in noise levels. 7. There would be some pollution caused by the idling of vehicles waiting to be served in the drive-thru lanes. Due to the surrounding land uses and the proximity to Highway 55, this increase would not be significant. 8. The proposed use is not anticipated to attract pests. 9. Based on the site plans submitted and the architectural design of other TruStone Financial buildings that will be used as models for this structure, the visual quality of the property will be enhanced. 10.Staff does not anticipate any other negative effects of the proposed use. The location is a commercial area with good access that can handle any additional traffic. This Conditional Use Permit is subject to all of the terms of the permit to be issued including, but not limited to the following specific conditions: 1. The plans by HTG Architects submitted on July 10, 2014, shall become a part of this approval. 2. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from Fire Chief John Crelly to Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager, dated August 18, 2014, shall become part of this approval. 3. A bicycle rack shall be added to the property providing for a minimum of four spaces. 4. All signage must meet the requirements of the City's Sign Code (Section 4.20). 5. This approval is subject to all other state, federal, and local ordinances, regulations, or laws with authority over this development. Section 2. The tract of land affected by this ordinance is legally described as follows: Lot 1, Block 3, Golden Valley Industrial Park Section 3. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Sec. 11.99 entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 4. This ordinance shall take effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law. Adopted by the City Council this 16th day of September, 2014. /s/Shepard M. Harris Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: /s/ Kristine A. Luedke Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk C"t��1 f�'� Planning IJepartment 763-593-8095/763-593-8109(fax) , i�4 ''ifi�� ' 'vu�°°� .`tr�= . �d 4�1 . . '�(� `?y�iibrv�.. 'i4(: .. (E- ,.�!�.- .i '"f. . . �„.��. F�4i4� �..�"_ .�S"'z� ';.��` ..��r' . Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting September 16, 2014 60 day deadline: September 8, 2014 60 day extension: November 7, 2014 Agenda Item 4. B. Public Hearing- Ordinance#529 - Final Plan for Carousel Automobiles PUD No. 95, Amendment #3 -9191 and 9393 Wayzata Boulevard -Twin Cities Automotive DBA Golden Valley TCA P., LLC, Applicant Prepared By Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager Summary Twin Cities Automotive is requesting an amendment to Carousel Automobiles PUD No. 95 to construct a new building to house the Porsche of Minneapolis. The original PUD permit for a new auto dealership was approved by the City Council on October 2, 2001. An amendment to add to the PUD a lot across the street for parking was approved in 2002. In April of 2014 an amendment to expand and renovate the existing Porsche facility was approved but no action was taken. The Applicant has decided to pursue the current request instead. The total lot area for the PUD is 9.9 acres;the property contains two dealerships—Audi of Minneapolis and Porsche of Minneapolis. The proposed PUD amendment would allow the Applicant to construct a new Porsche of Minneapolis building in the western parking lot currently used by the Audi dealership. The proposed two-story building would have a footprint of 23,665 square feet. The construction of the new building would require a reworking of the existing Audi parking lot and a reduction in the number of total parking spaces available. Under the Zoning Code, the proposal for the two dealerships would require 400 parking spaces (304 for Audi and 96 for Porsche). Based on the plans the Applicant has submitted, 557 parking spaces would be provided. This would be a net loss of 76 spaces compared to the existing parking situation. The Applicant has stated that the existing Porsche building would remain, though it would only house internal Porsche and Audi operations and would not be utilized for a third franchise. One concern raised during review of the Preliminary Plan was the non-conformity of the existing lighting levels within the Audi parking lot. Under the new lighting plan, the Applicant has worked to adjust the lighting levels to meet the current ordinance and the maximum levels now remain under the required limits. At the August 25, 2014, Planning Commission meeting, the Commission voted 4-0 to recommend approval of the Final PUD Plan. The City has previously determined that this PUD meets the standards established in the City Code and laid out in the Staff report to the Planning Commission. Staff believes that this application to amend the PUD is also consistent with these standards. City Code establishes standards for PUDs, which are laid out in the attached staff report to the Planning Commission. In addition, City Code establishes findings that must be made by the City when creating a PUD. These findings are included in the City Council's recommended action. 1. The plans prepared by Baker Associates and submitted with the application on July 10, 2014, shall become a part of this approval. 2. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Fire Department to Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager, dated August 18, 2014, shall become a part of this approval. 3. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Engineering Division to Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager, dated August 18, 2014, shall become a part of this approval. 4. Parking in the lot south of Wayzata Boulevard shall be limited to inventory vehicles. Employee parking in this area will not be permitted. 5. All signage must meet the requirements of the City's Sign Code (Section 4.20). 6. This approval is subject to all other state, federal, and local ordinances, regulations, or laws with authority over this development. In addition the Council makes the following findings pursuant to City Code Section 11.55, Subd. 5(E): 1. The PUD plan is tailored to the specific characteristics of the site and achieves a higher quality of site planning and design than generally expected under conventional provisions of the ordinance. 2. The PUD plan preserves and protects substantial desirable portions of the site's characteristics, open space and sensitive environmental features including steep slopes, trees, scenic views, creeks, wetlands and open waters. 3. The PUD plan includes efficient and effective use (which includes preservation) of the land. 4. The PUD plan results in development compatible with adjacent uses and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and redevelopment plans and goals. 5. The PUD plan is consistent with preserving and improving the general health, safety and general welfare of the people of the City. 6. The PUD plan meets the PUD Intent and Purpose provision and all other PUD ordinance provisions. Attachments • Location Map (1 page) • Planning Commission Minutes dated August 25, 2014 (3 pages) • Memo to the Planning Commission dated August 25, 2014 (4 pages) � Memo from the Fire Department dated August 18, 2014 (1 page) • Memo from the Engineering Division dated August 18, 2014 (3 pages) • Applicant's Narrative (1 page) • Site Plans received July 10, 2014 (18 pages) • Ordinance #529, Approval of the Final Plan of Development, Carousel Automobiles PUD No. 95, Amendment #3, Twin Cities Automotive DBA Golden Valley TCA P., LLC, Applicant (2 pages) Recommended Action Motion to adopt Ordinance #529, Approval of the Final Plan of Development, Carousel Automobiles PUD No. 95, Amendment#3, Twin Cities Automotive DBA Golden Valley TCA P., LLC, Applicant. -�--� � � � , ��} � �' g�� .. t _--,�.� '�4'� �'` ,,��'�,�'' � '� :� ; ' �� , _ � � , �J��, ` `� f j, � � 4 v .,�;- � f � � � r--` _ � �..�, ,.�-��--�-...�,'� �; ( .e ��_.�--""� i ' � ` Subject Property ' ---------�`"`� `----- � ; � ° . �� _ � , � � .-., �� r ar«� .. �nwrsw�e Hwy s9M1 . m � ' li�t«swte NwY s9n...w•rrrM`"'�""�"" c � � d : °� ..--•-°.�-.'m,;,e'w""" Z ' �--�—^� � .�� # .� i �� ,� �//"� ,j' �:i � � a�"4--.�„}�� g .. Y � � �.° �, . ' �`. 1` .'..� � �," �z+�' � I �� `�.: ' i �,,"'~�.w..�``* � ''"�..,r.,..�°``/r''°�r/J �#�'�r` f-/ _ Z — � fi °, � �' ��.� '��k .%� LYa�v 7til�tl_...� � {��w � � � . f � .� � �^�i Y,,�� a' f � � �f � .�/ .. �" ; k'" j `' ,,,,...-.,..-t.,. �� — �:.f ( / .. / � 'veaaty�cr�l')f�ta"�.�1''t�r�rent�a, 'tcC�r�ter :� `y • t / ; y. a - ) " �/L.�,,;y � # k (p.._"'J . .L.�'�i. � � y :. a�\ ' ��yyq�l �rwM�Ma�rM�w�Y, � .� � �" �� . i' ..z j ,`\ y,I /� . .�� vllu tk��)q•'�' aJrt�y�•�:�C.d �Nwr.•� � aY��;,. � � � ST.LOtJIS PARK� "�,��' ,w� ''�°�,'' ;v �"�` �'estwcad�. �.., �,.�� .,,` . ; `— :� *�" _. �u � � � �_ ad r. - .=. ' __ - �� '� �„ � �, �Y f � '�_ �� ,�y �� Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission August 25, 2014 Page 5 Findinqs: 1. Tr Stone will be relocating from their urrent location at 6500 Olson Memorial Hig ay and will likely maintain if not row their existing base of customers. 2. A fin cial institution is consistent wit; the Commercial designation of this property on the eneral Land Use Plan Map. ,, 3. Staff an ' ates the newly constructe `� building would not have a ne tive impact on the surrou ing properties. In fact, th�' addition of a quality buildir�g'to the vacant site is anticipate o have a positive effec�� 4. As part af the iginal submission in 2�08, a traffic study was-done for this use and anticipated no co cerns. Since this p��posal is a slightly,scaled back version of the original plan, Staff es not expect ar�y negative traffic�impacts to the surrounding areas. �;, �%' 5. The proposed use woulc�><,generate a minor increa"se in the number of employees at the location. �°��; �,� � �_� 6. The proposed use is not anticipated �o cause an increase in noise levels. 7. There would be some pollution caus�d k��the idling of vehicles waiting to be served in the drive-thru lanes. Due to the'sur��aunding land uses and the proximity to Highway 55, this increase would not��e significant. 8. The proposed use is not anticipated to attract pests. 9. Based on the site plans submit��d and the architectural design of other TruStone Financial buildings that will be'used as models for this structure, the visual quality of the property will be enhance`d. �� 10.Staff does not anticipate;any other negative effects of the proposed use. The location is a commerci�l"'area with go�d access that can handle any additional traffic. /� � ,f' �, Conditions: ; ' � 1. The plans by HTG�Architects submitt�d on July 10, 2014; shall become a part of this approval. � ��'; � � 2. The recommendations and requirem�nts outlined in the memo';from Fire Chief John Crelly to J��on Zimmerman, Plannin ' Manager, dated August �$,,, 2014, shall become ' rt of this approval. �; 3. A bicyc ` rack shall be added to the . operty providing for a minimu� of four spaces. 4. All si � age must meet the requireme ts of the City's Sign Code (Section 4.20). 5. Thi approval is subject to all other st te, federal, and local ordinances, regulations, o aws with authority over this develo ment. 4. Informal Public Hearing — Final Plan Review— Planned Unit Development (PUD) — Carousel Automobiles (Porsche Dealership) PUD #95, Amendment#3 Applicant: Twin Cities Automotive (Porsche) Address: 9191 and 9393 Wayzata Blvd. Purpose: To construct a new Porsche facility on the west side of the property. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission August 25, 2014 Page 6 Zimmerman stated that the Preliminary PUD plan for this proposai was approved by the City Council in July, and the applicant is now starting the Final PUD approval process. He referred to a site plan and explained the applicant's request to modify the existing parking area and to construct a new Porsche of Minneapolis building located to the west of the existing Audi building. He stated that since the Preliminary Plan stage the applicant has made stight modifications to the parking lot layout and the number of parking spaces. They've also made adjustments to the outdoor lighting levels. He discussed the design of the building and stated that it meets the setback requirements of the underlying Commercial zoning district, and there will be no change in the amount of impervious surFace because the new building will replace an existing paved area. Zimmerman discussed parking on the site. He stated that the current number of parking spaces on the site is 633 spaces. The applicant is proposing to reduce the number of parking spaces to 557 which is a reduction of 76 spaces overall. The Preliminary PUD plan reduced the parking by 64 spaces. He stated that the applicant is also proposing 37 parking spaces that would encroach approximately five feet into the front yard setback, and approximately 34 display spaces that would fall entirely within the 35 foot front yard setback area along Wayzata Boulevard. Waldhauser questioned if condition #5 in Zimmerman's staff report regarding the relocation of the parking spaces along the south portion of the lot near the proposed building, should be removed. Zimmerman said yes, condition #5 from his memo should be removed. Waldhauser asked if the triangular shaped, landscaped island shown on the plans is new. Nguyen Hoang, Baker Associates, 150 South Fifth Street, Architect for the project, said that landscape island is not new and was shown on the preliminary plans. Kluchka asked about snow storage. Wayne Pisinski, Twin Cities Automotive, Applicant, stated that they might melt the snow on-site. Blum asked what they did to address the lighting on the site. Pisinski said they switched to LED lighting. Hoang added that the raised the light poles as well to provide more even lighting. Kluchka opened the public hearing. Seeing and hearing no one wishing to comment, Kluchka closed the public hearing. MOVED by Waldhauser, seconded by Segelbaum and motion carried unanimously to recommend approval of the Final PUD Plan for PUD #95, Amendment #3, Carousel Automobiles subject to the following findings and conditions: Findinqs: 1. The PUD plan is tailored to the specific characteristics of the site and achieves a higher quality of site planning and design than generally expected under conventional provisions of the ordinance. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission August 25, 2014 Page 7 2. The PUD plan preserves and protects substantial desirable portions of the site's characteristics, open space and sensitive environmental features including steep slopes, trees, scenic views, creeks, wetlands, and open waters. 3. The PUD plan includes efficient and effective use (which includes preservation) of the land. 4. The PUD Plan results in development compatible with adjacent uses and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and redevelopment plans and goals. 5. The PUD plan is consistent with preserving and improving the general health, safety and general welfare of the people of the City. 6. The PUD plan meets the PUD Intent and Purpose provision and all other PUD ordinance provisions. Conditions: 1. The plans prepared by Baker Associates and submitted with the application on July 10, 2014, shall become a part of this approval. 2. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Fire Department to Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager, dated August 18, 2014, shall become a part of this approval. 3. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Engineering Division to Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager, dated August 18, 2014, shall become a part of this approval. 4. Parking in the lot south of Wayzata Boulevard shall be limited to inventory vehicles. Employee parking in this area will not be permitted. 5. All signage must meet the requirements of the City's Sign Code (Section 4.20). 6. This approval is subject to all other state, federal, and local ordinances, regulations, or laws with authority over this development. Informal Public Hea g — Preliminary Plan Review— Planned Unit Development (PUD) ;� Golden Villas — PUD #118 Ap .,icant: Golden �l'illas LLC `� .� ,4. , p�' �f, Address 0.� 9130 &'9220 Olson Mersiorial Highway ,,, , ; �� ,a Purpose: To�construct a `ven-story, 162-unit apartment building. �.:,.� �. Zimmerman stated that the,'= plicant is proposing to develop a seven-story, 162 unit, market rate apartment building¢�;, the 2:57 acre site. He stated that the applicant is also seeking TIF assistance to he make the project financially feasible. He noted that 9130 Olson Memorial Highwa contairrs a small, one-story office building, and 9220 Ofson Memorial Highway conta''s the vacant bowling aCle,y. � ��: Zimmerm�fi referred to a s;te lan and ex lained tha p p ; t the proposed new buildmg will be central located on the sit' . He stated that there'will be two access points on Golden Valley Roa , and a sidewalk will b�e constructed along Goltle�n Valley Road. He referred to the p ing on the site, and no�d that the majority of the parking will be underground or �:z�y �� . �,'� Planning Department 763-593-8095/763-593-8109{fax) Date: August 25, 2014 To: Golden Valley Planning Commission From: Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager Subject: Informal Public Hearing– Final PUD Plan for Carousel Automobiles PUD No. 95, Amendment#3–9191 and 9393 Wayzata Boulevard–Twin Cities Automotive DBA Golden Valley TCA P., LLC, Applicant . , . . _ .P :� �-. . a. ., ..� .. ..�=�3� �z, R�:�'�:�..as� Background Twin Cities Automotive is requesting an amendment to Carousel Automobiles PUD No. 95 to construct a new building to house the Porsche of Minneapolis dealership. The original PUD permit for a new auto dealership was approved by the City Council on October 2, 2001. An amendment to add to the PUD a lot across the street for parking was approved in 2002. In April of 2014 an amendment to expand and renovate the existing Porsche facility was approved but no action was taken. The Applicant has decided to pursue the current request instead. The property is zoned "Commercial" and is guided for long-term "Retail/Service" use on the General Land Use Plan map. The totat lot area for the PUD is 9.9 acres; it is bounded by Highway 169 to the west and Interstate 394 to the north. Wayzata Boulevard forms a partial southern boundary and also separates the auto dealerships to the north from a parking area to the south. The property is owned by the applicant, Twin Cities Automotive, and contains two dealerships— Audi of Minneapolis and Porsche of Minneapolis. Summary of Proposal The proposed PUD amendment would allow the Applicant to construct a new Porsche of Minneapolis buitding in the western parking lot currently used by the Audi dealership. The proposed two-story building would have a footprint of 23,665 square feet. The construction of the new building would require a reworking of the existing Audi parking lot and a reduction in the number of total parking spaces available. Under the Zoning Code, the proposal for the two dealerships would require 400 parking spaces (304 for Audi and 96 for Porsche). Based on the plans the Applicant has submitted, 557 parking spaces would be provided. This would be a net loss of 76 spaces compared to the existing parking situation. The Applicant has stated that the existing Porsche building would remain, though it would only house internal Porsche and Audi operations and would not be utilized for a third franchise. Proposed Building The applicant intends to construct a new building that would contain the Porsche operations. The first floor of 23,665 square feet would contain a showroom, sales offices, service areas, and a car wash. The second floor would house employee facilities in 6,170 square feet. With approximately 1,120 square feet of inezzanine space, the total square footage would be 30,955 square feet. As proposed, the new building would meet all setbacks as established by the underlying Commercial zoning district. The new building would have a similar appearance to the existing Porsche building, utilizing silver aluminum panels, glass, and illuminated signage. A long skylight on the roof would provide natural light to the second floor employee area as well as down to the first floor showroom. The Applicant has indicated that the appearance of the existing Porsche building would likely need to be modified to reduce the possibility of confusion with the new facility. Proposed Parking There are currently 192 parking spaces in the area to be occupied by the new Porsche Dealership. The total number of parking spaces across the entire PUD is 633. The proposed amendment would reconfigure the parking in the existing Audi lot and ultimately reduce the number of parking spaces by 76 to 116 spaces there and 557 overall. There is a fair amount of room for flexibility in how the spaces might be distributed between parking for customer, employees, and display vehicles. In a change from the Preliminary PUD Plan, the 67 parking spaces in the lot across Wayzata Boulevard have no longer been designated as employee parking but will be used for inventory parking, as approved in the first PUD amendment in 1991. The lack of crosswalks nearby raised safety concerns for employees who might be trying to cross Wayzata Boulevard. Under the proposed reconfiguration, 37 parking spaces would be added to the south property line in front of the new Porsche building. The first 5 feet of each of these space would fall within the setback area. In addition, a new display area—constructed of pervious pavers—would be located entirely within the setback area and parked in tandem with the vehicles in the spaces to the north. It appears this areas could contain as many as 34 vehicles, though the Applicant has indicated that many fewer vehicles would be displayed there. Site Considerations The proposed plans call for the use of pervious pavers in an area currently containing turf and landscaping. Though the use of pervious pavers will allow for infiltration, a small amount of impervious surfaces surrounding the pervious pavers will reduce infiltration in those areas. Conversely, along the back of the lot a number or parking spaces wiil be removed to create room for a drive aisle; some of this currently paved area is proposed to be returned to turf. A triangular island in the middle of the new Porsche parking area will also be constructed with pervious pavers, increasing the infiltration in an area previously covered with asphalt. Overall, the level of imperviousness on the site will increase. Landscaping plans submitted indicate the removal of trees within the front setback area to allow for the construction of the new display spaces. Clusters of new trees and shrubs are proposed to revegetate this area. In addition, landscaping would be added to the triangular island. No plantings are indicated around or along the foundation of the new building. The existing fighting within the Audi parking lot is non-conforming with respect to the outdoor lighting ordinance adopting in 2007. For auto sales areas, the Zoning Code requires lighting levels not to exceed a maximum of 20 footcandles; current levels are as high as 73 footcandles. Under the revised lighting plan, the Applicant has worked to adjust the lighting levels to meet the ordinance and the maximum levels now top out at 19.8 footcandles. Public Works and Fire Safety Considerations As is standard practice for development proposals, plans for this proposal were reviewed by the City's Engineering Division to ensure the site can be adequately served by public utilities and that traffic issues are resolved. A memorandum from the Engineering Division that addresses sanitary sewer and water services, stormwater management, and tree preservation and landscaping is attached. The Fire Department reviewed this proposal to ensure that an adequate water supply is provided and that adequate emergency vehicle access is achieved on the site. A memorandum from the Fire Department that addresses fire hydrants and the location of a fire department connection is attached. lustification for Consideration as a PUD The PUD process is an optional method of regulating land use in order to permit flexibility in uses allowed, setbacks, height, parking requirements, and number of buildings on a lot. The City has previously determined that this PUD meets the standards established in the City Code; Staff believes that this application to amend the PUD is also consistent with these standards: • Achieves a high quality of site planning, design, landscaping, and building materials which are compatible with the existing and planned land uses. • Encourages creativity and flexibility in land development. • Encourage efficient and effective use of land, open space, streets, utilities, and other public facilities. • Allow mixing land uses and assembly and development of land to form larger parcels. • Encourage development in transitional areas which achieve compatibility with all adjacent and nearby land uses. • Achieve development consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. • Achieve development consistent with the City's redevelopment plans and goals. In order to be approved as a PUD, the City must be able to make the following findings: 1. Quality Site Planning. The PUD plan is tailored to the specific characteristics of the site and achieves a higher quality of site planning and design than generally expected under conventional provisions of the ordinance. 2. Preservation. The PUD plan preserves and protects substantial desirable portions of the site's characteristics, open space and sensitive environmental features including steep slopes, trees, scenic views, creeks, wetlands, and open waters. 3. Efficient— Effective. The PUD plan includes efficient and effective use (which includes preservation) of the land. 4. Compatibility. The PUD Plan results in development compatible with adjacent uses and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and redevelopment plans and goals. 5. General Health. The PUD plan is consistent with preserving and improving the general health, safety and general welfare of the people of the City. 6. Meets Requirements. The PUD plan meets the PUD Intent and Purpose provision and all other PUD ordinance provisions. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the Final Plan for Carousel Automobiles PUD No. 95, Amendment No. 3, subject to the following conditions: 1. The plans prepared by Baker Associates and submitted with the application on July 10, 2014, shall become a part of this approval. 2. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Fire Department to Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager, dated August 18, 2014, shall become a part of this approval. 3. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Engineering Division to Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager, dated August 18, 2014, shall become a part of this approval. 4. Parking in the lot south of Wayzata Boulevard shall be limited to inventory vehicles. Employee parking in this area will not be permitted. 5. The site plan shall be revised to reiocate the parking lot spaces along the south portion of the lot near the proposed building outside of the front yard setback area. 6. All signage must meet the requirements of the City's Sign Code (Section 4.20). 7. This approval is subject to all other state, federal, and local ordinances, regulations, or laws with authority over this development. Attachments Location Map (1 page) Memo from the Fire Department dated August 18, 2014 (1 page) Memo from the Engineering Division dated August 18, 2014 (3 pages) Applicant's Narrative (1 page) Site Plans received July 10, 2014 (18 pages) t l�}�' �:�� , �� <:...� .,��.� � Fue Depaitment 753-593-8079/763-593-8Q98 {fax) Date: August 18, 2014 To: Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager Cc: Jeff Oliver, City Engineer From: John Crelly, Fire Chief Subject: Final PUD—9191/9393 Wayzata Blvd— Porsche of Minneapolis—Amendment#3 I have reviewed the application for the Final PUD application for Porsche of Minneapolis— Amendment#3 located at 9191/9393 Wayzata Blvd. Listed below are my comments that were originally listed in a June 2, 2014 memo. These three items have not been addressed: 1. The installation and maintenance of any fire hydrant shall be in accordance with the City of Golden Valley Public Works Department. Private fire hydrants located on private property shall be identified with a red paint color. The installation of a fire hydrant shall be within 150 feet of any fire department sprinkler connection or standpipe connection located on the building. City Policy and Minnesota State Fire Code Section 9.3.3.7. Provide a fire hydrant within 150 feet of the building fire department connection (FDC).Add a fire hydrant on the west side of the new building. Also,the utility plan does not show an existing fire hydrant for the Audi dealership on the northwest corner of their building.This fire hydrant need to be maintained (not removed) in this approximate location. 2. The fire department connection (FDC) shall be located within 150 feet of the hydrant. The plan does not indicate a location for the FDC. Please the FDC location on future utility plans 3. The storage of motor vehicles located in the show room shall be in accordance with the Minnesota State Fire Code Section 314.4 If you have any questions, please contact me at 763-593-8065, or e-mail icrelly@goldenvallevmn.�ov city o,f r�, Q�c��Yl MEN� QR � � � C� �''� � ��. ��T Public Works Department J 763-593-8030/763-593-3988(fax) � Date: August 18, 2014 To: vlason Zimmerman, Planning Manager From: Jeff Oliver, P.E., City Engineer � Eric Eckman, Public Works Spec ist�-� Subject: Final PUD Amendment#3—Twin Cities Automotive— Porsche Dealership Engineering staff has reviewed the plans submitted by Twin Cities Automotive for the construction of a new Porsche building at the Porsche/Audi Dealership site located at 9191 and 9393 Wayzata Boulevard. The project is located southeast of the intersection of Interstate Highway 394 and Trunk Highway 169, and north of Wayzata Boulevard (also known as the I-394 South Frontage Road). This memorandum discusses items that must be addressed prior to approval of the final PUD by the City Council. The comments contained in this review are based on the plans submitted to the City on July 10, 2014. Site Plan The plans submitted for the development include the construction of a new Porsche dealership on the west side of the existing lot. The existing Porsche and Audi dealership buildings on site will remain. In addition,the parking lot in front of the proposed Porsche building will be expanded to the south to provide additional parking for display and customer parking. Utilities There is adequate capacity in the City's sanitary sewer and watermain systems to provide service to the proposed addition to the PUD amendment. The proposed plans include the extension of sanitary sewer from the existing on-site sanitary sewer at the southeast corner of the current PUD to the west, parallel to the south property line to provide service to the proposed building. The sanitary sewer within the PUD will be owned and maintained by the property owner. There is an existing City-owned watermain adjacent to this development that parallels the MnDOT ramp from Trunk Highway 169 to Interstate Highway 394, and within Wayzata Boulevard along the south boundary of the PUD. The portion of the City watermain within the PUD is within 6:\Developments-Private\Twin Cities Automotive-Porsche\Memos\Memo_PUD final_081814.docx a platted drainage and utility easement that must remain in place. The City will continue to own and maintain this watermain following development. The proposed water service to the new building is from the existing City main on the north and west side of the site. The property owner will own and maintain the water service from the valve closest to the City main to the building. The remainder of the existing watermain within the site is owned and maintained by Twin Cities Automotive. The drainage and utility easement over this private watermain was vacated as part of the previous PUD amendment approvals. The owner will be required to enter into a Utility Maintenance Agreement outlining the owner's responsibilities for the sanitary sewer, watermain, and storm sewer on site. This agreement will be prepared by the City and must be signed and returned to the City for recording, prior to the issuance of permits. A City of Golden Valley Right-of-Way Permit is necessary for all work within City easements or street rights-of-way. Water, Sewer, and Storm Sewer permits are required for all utility work on site. The two buildings within the existing PUD are in compliance with Golden Valley's Inflow and Infiltration Ordinance. However,the sewer service to the proposed dealership building will also need to be inspected for compliance before occupancy. Stormwater Mana�ement This project is within the Main Stem subwatershed of the Bassett Creek watershed. The project will require a City of Golden Valley Stormwater Management Permit. A review by the Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission (BCWMC) will also be required. The City must approve the Stormwater Management Plans prior to submittal to the BCWMC. In addition,the PUD is subject to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's NPDES Construction Permit. A copy of this permit must be obtained by the Developer and provided to the City, prior to issuance of any permits to begin work on site. Plans show 5,504 square feet of pervious pavers to be installed on the Porsche site. The maintenance requirements for these pavers must be included in the maintenance agreement discussed earlier in this review. The proposed building and parking areas include the installation of storm sewers which drain to the existing pond on the east side of the property. Existing and proposed stormwater calculations must be supplied to the City showing that the proposed drainage changes do not exceed the design capacity of the existing pond in terms of rate, volume, or water quality. The Erosion Control Plans must be changed to show down-gradient perimeter protection across the paved area on the south end of the building site. This must be completed at the time of application for the City of Golden Valley Stormwater Management Permit. 6:\Developments-Private\Twin Cities Automotive-Porsche\Memos\Memo_PUD_final_081814.docx Tree Preservation and Landscape Plan City Forestry staff reviewed the Landscape Plan and determined that at least six significant trees (spruce) will be impacted by the proposed building and parking lot expansion. The proposed tree planting plan and landscape plan appear to meet City requirements. A Tree Preservation Permit will be required before work can begin. Prior to issuance of permits, the Developer will be required to sign a landscape deposit agreement and post a financial security as a guarantee that the landscaping will survive the two- year warranty period. In order to calculate the security,the Developer must submit to the City an estimate of the cost to furnish and install all landscape materials. Summarv and Recommendations Public Works staff recommends approval of the PUD Amendment for Twin Cities Automotive, subject to the comments contained in this review, summarized as follows: 1. The Owner must enter into a Utility Maintenance Agreement prior approval of the PUD Amendment by the Golden Valley City CounciL 2. The Owner or Contractor must submit an application to the Bassett Creek Watershed Management Organization. The Owner must submit stormwater calculations as part of its submittal. 3. The Erosion Control Plans must be changed to show down-gradient perimeter protection across the paved area. This must be completed at the time of application for the City of Golden Valley Stormwater Management Permit. 4. The Owner or Contractor must obtain a City of Golden Valley Right-of-Way Permit if work is done within an easement or street Right-of-Way. 5. The Owner must obtain a City of Golden Valley Tree Preservation Permit. 6. The Owner must submit estimated costs to furnish and install landscaping plant materials. Approval is also subject to the review and comment of the City Attorney and other City staff. Please feel free to call the Public Works Department if you have any questions regarding this matter. C: Tom Burt, City Manager Bert Tracy, Public Works Maintenance Manager Mitch Hoeft, PE, Utilities Engineer Mark Ray, PE, Street Maintenance Supervisor AI Lundstrom, Park Maintenance Supervisor and City Forester Kelley Janes, Utilities Supervisor John Crelly, Fire Chief Jerry Frevel, Building Official Sue Virnig, Finance Director G:\Developments-Private\Twin Cities Automotive-Porsche\Memos\Memo_PUD_final 081814.docx f�!� , m �� r�or��cH� JUL i Q 2014 �; May 8, 2014 BY �': Mark Grimes Porsche of Minneapolis Community Development Director 9191 Wayzata Boulevard Minneapolis, MN 55426 City of Goiden Valiey P. 763-744-9191 F. 763-744-9109 7800 Golden Valiey Rvad porscheofminneapolis.com Golden Valley, MN 55427 Dear Mr. Grimes, On behalf of Twin Cities Automotive, I am writing to request a PUD Amendment and consideration for the construction of a new Porsche of Minneapolis facility. After much consideration, Twin Cities Automotive feels it is in the best interest of our company, Porsche Cars North America, and the Golden Valley dealership campus to build a new Porsche facility rather than renovate the existing building. The cost to build new is comparable to the cost of renovating. More importantly,the finished product will be more functional and attractive due to not having to work around existing building constraints. The new facility will be located to the west of the existing Audi dealership.This will minimize disruptions to our current operations and help ensure business remains strong as we make this significant investment. lastly, relocating Porsche to the west end of the property provides maximum site flexibility for both Porsche and Audi as each business grows. The existing Porsche facility will be used to improve the internal operations of both the Porsche and Audi franchise.We have no intention of adding a third franchise to the property. We ask that you consider approving our plans for the new facility so that Porsche of Minneapolis can deliver strong sales growth to Porsche Cars North America, an unmatched experience to both existing and new customer,and additional job opportunities. Respectfully Submitted, C= Thomas 0. Pohlad r � � � I - � �+ I a � � � �; � J.�� 1t.1IiIiP.�,S`�Cl['I�'CES,i\'('.. AKI.`IISTP!`TS • • ,: orsc e o l�nea o is ��..:..��>>x.=,,�,�u.��_,_,�, " Porsche of Minneapolis ?wt H'xr.sr.nome.�..a � Guldeu F'allec,MN SSi26 New ConstrucNon ` �� i =� ��„� She t Ind , , ,, �f/� � ex �,.d: .;> : �� F..i�wy wc ma n.y smu :,�� : , , ; ��. � .` . . G-001 Trtle Sheet �„ � � � �.n� ms a..�mu � .. . �- ,. � � Klmel PJD �� Im Hj L{ � Wwtl lor R I�Jur 40M � ��//� C�V�� Ju ]O - � �j/ d C-001: Civil Title Sheet �/� �� /,. �� :�i��... ALTLA/ACSM; Land Title Survey ? ��e�, (By Westwood Professional Services) /�� j � � ; C-100 Overall Existing Conditions � � ��" � G200 Overall Site Plan � �� "��f� � G201 Enlarged Site Plan C-301 Grading,Drainage,Paving& i% Erosion Control „ �iiii/i� C-401 Utilities %/��,� C-402 Sanitary Sewer Layout " �� E-100 Existing Photometrics �� E-201 Proposed Photometrics r'� -� �' L-101 Tree Preservation Plan L-200 Overall Landscape Plan 6 L-201 Enlarged La�dscape Plan . ��` �i�r . , �" � ^ � i� i�� i� :. �� .. � i�� . �. ' � .�- y „�� _ _ -�- >�.�% � � A 01� F�st�Flo � ,�. t i%� ��i��%�� ,.� ___ _:, , � . �% _ �, � - ��. or Plan � � �„ t , , ,� � � 6 A-102 Second Floor Plan �, _� � . �� A-103 Roof Plan � � � � //'/'� - A-201 Exterior Elevations i �� i ��%// %��%% ��/�% �' ��.�� j� j�� , � �� , -�! ,, .. . i � �.� � ,,�.' Code Analysis Occupancy Diagram General Notes Location Map PRELIMINRRYCODEANALYSIS•PorscMMMinnecpal6 EaltAcreuTnve 6 TaEk101E1 sist wayrala Boulevera,GaMen vatley.MN 55426 �roun 6 whM1 Sprl Wa�. 300. t. iHl9 P@�JECt NAS BEEN DE9LCiJED AS H�E DESICd�I-BI11LD -a Grouo st wt�50 �� 3Ch PfGJEGT THE COIJTR4GTq2 I�1�5PON51BLE FOR i11E � ��- Propoaal. CESIGN AiJp GONSiR1GilON OF ALL NECE39ARY ANC lm ConsWdanewbulMinBiorsalesantlaervreofnewaiMpreaw�feNomobBes. �emmonPatM1e1E8 T Sec1�1C3 REGYJI�DMEGHANGPL,ELEGTRIGPLM'DPLIRtBING /`� GmupBorSiwi S Ue: 100n�ezcepibnt) PORTIQ'J60FTHEPRLJEGT � �� I� - RpplkaEk COEu �°°� . �� MNNESOTASiHTE8UILDNGGODE 200] EgressT�rouOh� enln05pecea bec.f01J2 �. �FERTO6iRUCiUR4LENGINEER55iR'JCTJRPIDR4WMG5 - "a BuMrwCaW NloweOvrt�x.reptions Pf�PGREC BY NOTGH ENGINEERING FOR iHE 9tRJG1�R4L /'� Mn�iiesolaAcessWltyCoE FtEWI�rIENi90Fi4EFROJECT. I / ,%/ � 2�06MG � e CortlCorFlrcresl Ratl�q Tebk101].1 b9I �a ,/�%� 2(IOE IFGC GrouO B waM1 sp�l 0 Hr. 3. d1L CON6IRJCTION 9F{4LL GOMPLY WI?H ALL SidiE dNC I I � I00?S�atePwmbin9Cuee Group51wl�sp�' �: OHr. LOCALB4ILDINGCODE9. �� ,. � taeEnegyGAe OceupmtLena. Sec.1006 4. GONTRACTORbHALLINYESTIGATE,VERIFI"ANpBE � �-39q 2IXIflNEC mFlmrAreaAtlawaMePerOcwryant Tablelooe.t.1 � �9PON91BLE£OR4LLGONDITION6�DMENSION90FTHE RelerenrstlSalinneendTebkvarelrom211�51BC�ur�xsmlx�IWMuisN. fi<<IooB PRO.�G?GNDSNALLNOtIFYtHE6�HItECt�GAI'AIA45;llJY jy��-- '--� ' ],bA311]I1110= 1]Q:r,upanls COrmITION�qUIRING HODIPIG4TION OR GHAk^iE TO THE �� MI%EOOCCIIPRNCYBIIILUINGT�BEN�NSEPARATEOIISE: Sec.508.3.R �°'-`aS^e"�f01e51. 1.320t12:300= SOccupanK �� YA�fdCBEFOFEPftGGEEDINCzWITHTHEWOfd',qRGNITEGT t6.01211i�300= 540auoenls 9HALL BE NOTIFIEp ABd1T ANY G�FLIC?5 0R OMI991GN9 �/, OcwDanryGrouW: Fi�FknrTONI: 1]60crupank R.E�P BEF�PROGEEPING WITH TNE WOFK. � OR/Snnxmom B See.304t � 5. TFIE CONTRACTOR 6H4LL VISIt THE SITE i0 fSCEFTdIN TNE R«.cT�o�.en e s.�ao..+ � i��„�„�»ma�ax a»z¢a i is aa o�aw�� B� - co�incws u�oeR wuicH rue uara<rwsr ee r��orreo. PorSChe of ' ep.irGarapa 51 Sec.311� �p: Zq6]fl2 100. 250cwpencs P^�� THE GONTRAGTOR SHALL NOTIFY i41E ARGNI1EGi li Smrege�Pare St Seu31t] II�IMEDIAIELYL DI9GREPANCIESFOUJDWItHIN?HE F M717TIE8�OIl$ JS ServcaDrrva 51 Sec.3t13 G 5: 4(i0- 9�Orcum�6 �� CON5TPo1CilON DOGIP'IENT6 RELATIvE TO 4GTJAL CONDITICN9, )I�I\ t1 1 cGNtrt.4CiCR 15 50l.ELr RE3pGJ51gLE FOR 4CCIlR.4C\OF bs � Conatruc�lonTYW 5 0 b Tolal: 180�.cupen6 / tioiJ�� all�v,t 12l DETAIL9 MID�OR CONFIR�IING ANp GOOfmINATING ALL ( n Co�ztrur.ibnTvpN10 Sec.6�3S T �911JIB��W��ad 31<�ccupana CY1PN'fITIESGNDDR1EN510N5.FOR6ELEGTINGiAERICATION I II � NlrweslsuncaRatMeReeubamenu(orBWItlMgEkrtren4.TableWt IlmumNumberINE+lbperSbry Table1U191 PP��E�S,��TEGHNI�p�GfA53E11B1.DYAND��T�' I I' � �1 �� onereQuma Groupssor5l� Rxquired�slorievwii S�Oouupank�:2 MbWERVERIfI"ALLDIMENEIGNS. � nm(orEmrbr WNk TaGIe 603 P�owsetl�2 d,�IJItEC?�1ry41.d)JD SiW1CiLRA1 DR4WING9 qRE MTENDEC ��.... 124 Nore%Qu1ke�u aFmsepaa�un14x�ance+30� NasimumOccupenlLonUlorSpettawlt�OneMwmINEO� Ta0k1015t 6 T09NOWANDDE6GRIgECETGIL9WRGC01'iPLETE owahkeuiltlinBHaeh�� TabN50J As�emMylummncenva�etly,49nrrupen��151�1/0¢. SiAJGT�qE.PAF2T5dIJDpEtAIL9NOtFilLLYSHOWJOR Gruup B: <9 occupanl��10�111iocr.. 5ecmd Floor 1 FbamM Plob DEYRIBEC SHALL HE EXECUIED AC.f..OF�MG TO 6TANDARD Grou05f: AtloweLL3eioYesProposeLL251o�lesw�EquipmenlMe:zanirks 29occup FIRbTGL.4ft;PRACTICE4NDINqHAMJER5R11LARTOAND�N 0 G�ou051: anu��00113/w. THE SPIRIT OF DETAILS 0Hp1N ON THE DR4WMG9.IF '1 /� . IowebkBUNtlinOArw: Sec.S]A MlnlmumNumEeroYReeulraJPlumMngFhtuma: Tapk3B02t C��R4C10RSHW.LFMD4NYCQJDITIONOROETAILWNICH �,I� � O /01� Te0lularAreeHbwabk�Ar1',t].SOOX2 teble503 M moing Flxlure w�m rxQuiree OyOuupercyGmup: IN HI9 OPINILN 15 IlN5dJND.IAI9.'1FE,OR NOT ll¢.1THERPROOF. - FreelnneasebrFronugeQ/�: Sec.5063 Pl�upanlloatlby6roup. NESLIGLLNOiIFI�THEqRGNITECTINLLR1tINGOFB1ICH GmupB(Ofllw/SM1avroon�Iacce>soryassamMySbrkerroom�):i<fiOccupan� COi`ID�TIONORDETAIL. - 11:��9ip�.p��'�3p - 0 EyS GroupS�(RepairGerega/ServlceWMaUp/PeM1vSror�e)'. 860mupenk ii'o��0eoan�-azs�anrw-,s ,;,,,,,oe.�.s��.��ce��a-�aM�s�aFPma�: I�I hsl I�+I�'I h�l F�I '. amcrt.��cnoNss�+ouMirvt�aao+rcecturzn�owwi�s A�TO ESTABLI6H AN OVERYL�PRESElJt4tIW OF THE gy. -5 WalerClosels Repubetl: 3 Mab 3 Female EUILDING.�FER 10 STRUGTURAL DRAIUIlYS FOR 51<E, 2 MaM 2 Femala CRIEIJT4TICN.LOC4TIGN AND DI�CTION Gf STRUGTJR4L alormWiiaioryBuMings'�Is�' Sac.Sosd DnnkingFnunuins ReqWred: ' M�� ServicxSinMs Reyuretl: B - . coNtW icR 9HALL BE F£SPONSIBLE-0R dGO'JISIiION OF To�a wadeareaperSkuy(Aal See506.1 5168 �6 ALLREOII�F£PPER^I!TBANOAPFROVAL3. �A�O c..^upanu l2�Jq Mele&39 Femak ila={A�.�Aixlfl�lA[xls]) E451 GWa�arCbau L.J Aa=!f].SOOIi2+�t.500f12x0.)57'It'/.500M1SxZ�1 Re4��IrM: Mak ' W �' r�� 9. PROVIDEGAl1LKOR3EALANTAT4LLMWiERIALiR4N51TION3 1�.SOOfi2��3,125i13+35.000M Levebnes ft�eQuirea: Male amale 4NDGLNSTRJCiIONJCINTt.FftOVIDECAULK415tAtIONGR! Dnnking Founuins qwmtl� Ae�c5.ti151V = � JOMTS AND PR�NDE SEdLMt AT.�1LL JOINT9 SIIBJEGT TD F 4 n rq rteci�weere�rv. Semce Sl�ks . Mp�,y�r. xu�e.i. equii¢OIPmNtle�: 1.s�Fbor V Aqoweble bs�6251�� osaC:13,fi55i� W �Plum� i coun�r a F I Ip. IlNLE96 OTHERWI9E NOTED,ALL DIMENS�ON9 ARE TO NOMIN4L 'e Alowa�k:NA posed: .13pip alar Glosw6��nP urc Poqulretl: Z e emak 511rF..10E OF MA30NFY,kAGE Gf UMLL,OR TO GRIC LINE. :\ 2n�Floor nYowabla:fi5.(:25f12 Pmpo�ed:6.1]01� ro{nsea: 9M1lale�+2u�ngs)xaf�emak3[ g __ ' � II. F.LL PLAN D�"1EN5�C':I6 qT OPENMGS A{a`E NOMMAL WICtu OF � �'°�' MaxlmumAreaoiExterlarWallOpeninpe: Table]4C.8 Lava�ones aqukeC: 3A1nW 3FamN.a CFENINGORR2W'1ELL4DTH.49OESIGNATED(FR:. 2l'14.i014 rvoLimli: Fire�eparaeonaisance�:i�ft. oposad: �ak% ..emakx g CpJTRAGTORSUALLPR%vIDEG7Rf�eiROIYNOPENhJG 5 r� Occupancy SeOeratlon: �nnklne Fountalns q�irM: 3 �' 6ND/OR A9 DE Ed EC a5�O�IRED BY OPENInKa SGiEDULE ��rr� GrouFB/GrouV51: OHr Teble5UB3] P d' ��'� ?IL2IEJhEE2 nul Ilaee: Sae 508] Servi�e SInFs RequireE: 2 I�. PROYIDE EPOM GR04T�4LL FLOOR Ti�E IN6tALL4iIGN5. WT'sxwYaralonmom(inan)-rvRtl�ieioFuioSo��N%sysiem iaEle5093 � d' � 13. IHlY�EFORILLIIS?RATIVEpl1�09E9IXJLY. 5 �� %Dano�eslFelounl-sesiolle�areelsO�Wsadw�IcnlnrAudeeinelolbwlr�eanPoonalikiu�as:� �.umev Non.�nmkuM q�µannaxrep ro s 8E wa�ei dosel,t unnal ane Moqvaiorzs. - y�� FlreEa�InSUls�ing5yahm:' Sec.903 Rceeasl�lllry: MSBCCM1apler13a1 �^'oo� Au�omatir e��kl � m�obeinxulle�acro.nn+g�o5er.uon�3.:.t� Tn�sVrojedis�xsig�eEinconrorn�ancewlNmehI58CCnapert3al. 4 t7 ENOOf LOOEAN4LT66 fln4 FIoIX Plen ��p�p I � I _ � ;� � � � ; � . �� i � � BA HA%ER A9BOCIATEB.INC. GOLDEN VALI.EY,3LN ARCHITSCTB o ,r . . . . �� w1n C1t1es Automotive �� a�� MINNEAPOLI9,MN S^iG04-]400 TELSPAONE:B1P.88D.88111 FAB:819.88B.6B88 Q Porsche of �., � � � • • Pors che of M1nne a olls Minneapolis � � � 9191 WayvteBouleve[d �r � Coldrn Vallry.bIN 53426 y,P New Facility ---— �: � _ PRELIMIN4¢YWD BHCYf014 Ni[a�TA1E AI � FRELII1INLRY WD MdY 13.�014 FlNPL PlD JILY ID,301� � Y ��r�� waY=��F�� Golden Valle , Minnesota � y � SITE �� p% � I o n„. rt. eusn+<+ o�acxrriu+ r�Ex' ceee+wiu+ eruea oEsrnimw NVINCITIESAUTOMOTNE & LF. �ai cm —��3. CQJi0U2 �113_/ CONtGU2 fA01WAYlATABdIEV030 �a. �o.oeM�ww v...�w. - _._-... sEAv+.coN.ea.rfNCE nra�iu.w�� . eweae.. m.u.�. �96�` rw� svol e�Evs'nal uNp•�, ,� iELIHDsm19l A/CYa Un �y�'�� I LA �V ANG �x5 ♦/ NLE1GROiELiGN COMA4T�.WAM£PIBH9p e Lm�o.nn Y �, WLqrC pa°i`a a�e u� 0 c�h a� ._.'___' `u�oeeceouvnuu w•" � BttlMNQS �——J aiK'neE BYY80L OFBCAIPfION SXFEfNO. UEBpiPf10N , �.`5�.«�,�, �,�n�. O 0 ��RF.E om, �NrTm�SH�r "�1i0 0.,�,.reM or r.a�„�..�.�, `"wscna� � KTuncsx uuormewm�rlerwesm000xro�ssioxksmv� ��i rea,�,. � � Nme ec,�eQe� o�ao overuuons�rtweaaoma+s � e�:�'"e i:a:�i�" � ,a,, vnAv�e�oce --. .— nv�Nr O oa�uc s,nu.cou+. czm ovErwusrtEAnn B.tlw . R b rtm♦� B Ln4GEsrRtTOETts C301 GPM�NOOtWlYG�MVINO,lEli0S10NCONTR9L �5 a vAVNc e�OCK � EiE eE v G01 UTNTIFS o,d �.vx O coaxo�nlE oaNr GOi SW?NIYSEN'ERIAYOUt o�c. > . Sioan SEwErt L� E-tOp E%i5fNOPHOTOMflitMS �EiN etc. E-A1 PROPO�DPHOTONEIftNS O.E. �irc > - rtalc wu� Qi aEVI510N a�oEroun.aul L-101 TREERiESERVRiIONRAN CertMw�� o�d��em C� rt ttaonr Ua w l•a•y•�...i,•-;, snnnmco�wYa�cna� � bm�y Wn wa�n tw� .. r .. �� ( a[ve,Eo w¢[�n(nas�ssueJ L400 WEMLLIFN�SGPEPLW �NG. Opemo _ __ C� y.� larol ENA0.GEDLW�9GPERAN a� � ....i.., �� m P�a %i.g v/l nv&nv Vowe —i,E o 11ECIRC SLOFE o¢[�CiiRl • . ^'(�^"�°"dlw PSF. P�s°�y�orc cooi —G— 4re 4rr� �`.::p: CAiw Bnv�N v��orc ircn � ccHcuEiE cute _�Q: naHro� caNiv.tw�soin.ioza[Ns vaavaalv.ioaatw ccrzr�enlE No. rio. �Uy1lli�NGW�ECTi�8 Y RANN�NG��PA0.iA/FNT � Comv .... IPI3B59 )BO��G0.DENTVK�LE5fR0. "1800 G�YV YN 5 n �r�� al oiarcv FENGING ` 80LLPR0 . . 5 . �Gll.� V. I Verte i i.Tm oESC. Oe a�� T v�n��d�Pdeamvn �I� � �R5TS�4n� 9TatM sEwEz T.NYM9oN R[4roJ'ES D.dnm/�e.oien v�kEP. .n�'m � —85PN—>— OEfI. Deporr.mm ^" ¢EiAINNG WPLL R WASiE O.a� - _ _ `�,�++�cP� — —e"�^—>— ^ - - - FINAL PUD °K;""t�Pa a�"� � wA�o� —s•Ro—»— R��,s.s,En G�,s F.x,63,-.;- �, � �� Q� pre� ��,��,i�� J U LY 10.2014 E veniee..bm. FRE�u MIIAS MN 55059 0038 EN VALLEY ao. E'� aD. o,�" —s^ws..�— E lF scvnen'rE) . rw 551z� E ws. E�e�y av.rno.s.a. RD. em��pem.a ` . �uEEs � Fv_E oc9i.carPEcraN Evt naNsoN G rn.rvEz • • Ei".�m a�s. �n`s�co O^ a d n a�.��esc,.nnrne��..�� - � <� e� � � �� a � o �� W �, R �� u o ��Q ga : ��. 8� Q L � � o� ag� i� � � � $ 'co R� ��< �.s OF a a$ ° �� 8: q vro � �� 8 ao a �� -� m .r . �� 'y� a� .sa 8 e °�� `3�� S°� $` � �,a e ` �o� � 5 8 `x"€ ; ,� � s� S g x'� �o� �,H Q °o o �• �, � $c�k E � ,; � n��A� S� s £ �� fi.i< �o� �� 6u� q,� a 5�$� m � E a c�e �� _ �€oas � $�� o.� `d,b, g x � � ony �� '� � oyq � _�� = E�M ``� o � ` � g n N o$v L� �a � �'o �$ €'ae e^a ee }� " E�� y��+� �m ' �xe�� = �-_ �s" S- �i Ne� Ee; • € o zry U d � E 8 �8 � � E�>r4.. E r � o�L �= �e � ��e a^J „ �°e cP " � � .��`i"n � E�� "�f p� o o� o$W ois a �a �� a. �'� �F " ��= �8 > � �.'.2<Ea � a" c"k� �8 m " '`^ � a5a &` s°� i e q5„t °° � $ �.��i �6 �� c p��$ �2 �• .FN��' gat $'m $ Q� ery.0 na� $¢ ,�-,`�e $� d ..��H P � Fq Z e 1 � � ��•g ?:, � � B� W k � 9T $'�C' � ,� o&Y�A E e Eg� �dV on k< aa 'u ~�€af t ��e &� u ua �;�oa o '�q &o ` h x2 i ,�..z g SQ�H �'- �o �.s b y .e 8"„ E c o U '8 vc 'O ry W •t� �`�` $ � ��'� �S e Sti � m��s � 3 ��u o o `y �Q fi �� S x E �. ��g kE w ,*, s �5 �.� fi o o� ��'p E� € `m ��p ��2 Eu e �� Ss��. " ' " _ � m>° o 0 8`e�"°e8 x N g .t, s°s� �� , €� `"3 �'�io �i B�� m H Y'na � .� 3�E n�,� � �=� � ��0 8 a a�'$ 6°e �� €� ��€� `�� >a� �' .� �€'`�� V� 3 e a R ��6_•sh _ uae o8 ' - �E � a.Ei-; ��o E 5=O $" � � e$ � d �Nq �a � �� E .s ��e�� £ o�k •rc b & � � � - �.Q� $� � o o S �g�e'�� v � Y< •�.r E o� °�� o�,$� �5�� LE'' a°e g S.� � n.g a �n'` " a 4�. 8a o � ��C '�� H ¢.s c W � rc k � o�2a � Q � v,'� L�' : a6 5 S <° s.sa > r` a5O �4 r �� ° u��x 8�i �3� `� � 5 .�35 8� � �� F e ��da� r Q �:� _�a � o �o� .9`g� Z�3� Ea� E a �� ad�' QI oN � d ;SSOq� a � x�. �5� � o o.� e � � �no� 3e d � `�` � s � 4 Y �L� §w$� o,��` r1 H oo� � � &o,�Vn .. E � o go.. €r:a� � 35�: ' g a 3s E pe� � o a a� 8�� s� 5� €- :oN�� "� ang g ; ega$ ^ �--� �`°� , S`g�E � o §., �€ o v�`3 § � cu°'c•a3 ��Y s°`L p ."E� � � a oLa h ��' J .��, c p � > g � �ywE �x S 5 , € �Pg:�A € � .e�g �� 3$ S �i �.�' Ez°e x ��''� a � 8� '�. 6 �� O �2 e a g� �° i, " �, i. e.�k�3'; °�� q .� .m`� �`�� °aW .�Y.�, �3W Sm a g p,� 2 � �x� �85� ? a aa t,o., t ��tes a o S E� ��g o $� �$i �'�e� �6� �$� 02 q� .& �:�8g V\ g � � � a"€�' ��, & a.s g' S a�Y�E< = a�.$ �`a =•�o = ng �°8� pa �� _ Tj Wa -'aa Qd � ''d� YSF2 a'� a �- a awg�.. .E _ cc�¢` 4'"'e 5� �L�� q-gc � � 0 5 � �o� €o a� �� `Y y._ ��n � �a E� & S� 5 � v�88 � '� �o�� d�, $`� 'i a CE� �y �Ncy> gc� �� z� o,^E�BQ �y iRo �,£ y� .g .� .�' §'t.. .$ 'C;�$ , ��.a ya € E � �� `u�m $n°s �R� � � e=` :� ts ,.5� � Ys a�� o S � m°;� ��E d � k �R 16 ��.. �� H � �3'a3a� � �i3$ �": p w°i w°iox u�5`�a <a� a o a -�� d � -�i S$ � F .. h h �e ut u � � � ., N �� •� •N• � •� •� e 1a C�i E�C'�o � i i I � i i ' i ' z i� i i o � � � �� i i�g I �� II----------g-----� � �7 � I ��J_--- os� � �.�3 Io a � 8 �l i --- —�------- ' ;� �a a a � . � m s o,z� <�3 —�—--� R� �a;m � � i �� Q .� I ��V1wN %f M aN%o l✓� o U �� rerod ptol! �_�� p `�^ '�a � _ sm I � WI Of � 3LZ9S ZON :�� "ax.a�o oN��,3 � �, Y .`� �g 8 �� - -- ----- : % .W` s s � I �,�'� --D'1A�1110 ---- I ' i „� - - � rt+saa� _ � I I � 1'___""a '� _______ _ —— — _ °3,LZ,9SoZON ^ d� O � I � I m --- �,� , _ . " �- � g -- 1 '— o w a � �- , $ i, 3# � :m � a - �i g i i $� I F+ P��i�� I i I i a� �„ � °" �� 4' c3� � g- � ��: i� � � --- - ;�; 5 � �� 4�, � c� • i i � y . I � � ze.00 +- � ou ° �� \ � • i `�; 1'' g8 6a� II � S €8 A ��y1 � � ------�oow � �;' �i �a$ d� .. I � l � �� C� p aso", N> 's�; ii 45�s e� � [�J, I � __�'_IWrn '1 �`� Pi zs \\ f '� �i �� '��Tt �a�� yg � [� I I �� .c , ' - o � i tN� $ i g,€`3 ,; k,� �N � 'o� _€� "ii � �° � i � F, - a i ;�._ � ;., `\ � a � �y �� I �d � _�-_' � /' l � {\\ \\ -- . ; a -------- I , , ° ii �.� +-- <� \. � ,M1,� � \ . \�� $�$ �� I =d , � , , �a� J i i �,� �, il � ', �� `�- � b�' . a; � . . ' . �a� � �� H1nOS � �y � I i� � � J� o ,�' \ �^ '$. �� oos� " _3nN3A V � �` � r�.ao-_F"'l"_ I g � ��e � � \ ♦ , '4 "11 n . I 1 C� I I P � �,�a / . �#q � � \t�\ � a , a�a � ��-- �� V d7� �k � E I I \ g . %� � � ;� I . , , _ � I �� I � Z �re.e� � s n �'� \� \�e �� $ � ;`i" �� 2 N II � � E E � � ,°� fi I 1 <' � i �a \ A cp �� k y 'rc-p �� 9 ��I � I � � � � ' � � � � I �_ , , � va,. ...o ;. �i `. � a €�i� � � I € s � � �� \ II q � I , U I I I -� I � I s.w �a� m \ -� � �r � \� '" �� ` ` ` � I .s° � �� Yo 3 � � � 6 � � I I � � 1J I 4 y `�� .' ' � « �'4 \\� ooTi"I I ' � I o 0 0 I I I I \' I I I �$ / ' `'1660 \�y V44 \\�b!'TI - O • Q g"h.' I I I I �� I I /� \ � �b .� ; \\ �� I ` � � � o , ` \ � �� L—J � � � � ' ; .�� I � I ay \ �. / ' l9'D II I I k a \� \\♦ I �� I � I ,�P 'r I ___io0.00__'_T--� I �B �• , "� { ��' �� i o� � \ ,, . , � �4 €a�t � i \ , � i � I � I �.E . o I:)� . 8E,E� � I �l � ` . a . � � � I �� „ � '` �\„ ;, •� a��v:� i € i �a N� s � � � I I I (^ � I � `� rY �� . \ � e � E$ � � � E �_ � � � � 4 � I � � u� �---�-ae.00 � � � n tF F € C� �, ': `� N� � �� $_ � M � � �}}}yyy _ ' 3 `j ,• t- I I „ � � � Z � . Z \ � O �e � �\ L . I '� `g � y � I O I i __�)S00___�I II j1� � �.. �� ,j � _ \\\, �99 _ i �4� �s 3 � � � � �3 � � � I � S � � i � I ��, C� � �� \/ �'� _ �a� `C ��'.� �s, � � �� i r� � � � � � o o � e� � � � 01 �= I � �r,�^ �'� ' �,' Q� i � I I � I I I I I I � � 9 E ,_ ��J � W � ��' �� i l e= � \ '<` c,� ,,. , i QC � ; I I � ' �O `, I � �� " �� ' � ' � � � � � .I I � ,� i � � IZ �� m � . , �t u; � � ; „ � , . � � � `� � a� � �° ° � �u i � � � � @i � �h � /� �, 3 g' � c` �' � � � � � � rc � �" I ml � I�QI <� o� � i � Ro yry � `) �'� � ' � I � � � � � � �, e e � ' �� I � �� `¢�� ,w i � I 6 � 3 � � � � �� n q �I I N �^ ¢ � e � I - § � �x l �_ �_ �� I �J �� o,, \.:' ,/ i �� '4s;m o o �m� a � ar o:� '�3.3 I �� I I�� Nu I � I Eo Oi I�FfpyS-/_ � M1 I I I I VS s� gg I i= '�� I I �� ; ' i r'' i � p � � p a I �4 I I '�S I �e I�o � � � � � � Q � � � � � Nm I ��I � •� I oa � � I � � ��! � � � g � � � g I B I �II �� I � �� • =� i I � a S d � � � � d � 3 v' I �\ p I � € i N I �V�I �-- \ \ �o� ---- -- ' � � i � � c � o � � � O�� a IQ� IW� '^� �� \ --��;- � � �-.__ �� Z I '�� z � �,� � --- � $ � I �� e e � r � � 3 I \ � � � fi�g�.oN x e F"��`i .`�,��,o � e � '_� � � � aS � a I a n rww.,ro� �o� I I � i C� \� �� \ �.�„�o.�,M��.,m3 es� i �� \� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � F� � � 8 8 's�£ � � \ � . i � � I Lj �_—�—-------- � . $<� tr i �° �.j � r� �1-_ aoa � Q �1 r�� O�NE�� .� o m m I �� `_ �� -�._ ———__=�, �� s�`rt ' ��' �<i I �� \ � ' �� I�- 8 —T,, \\��r��e' I 3 � , I I I I �BpSZS nN b0 51�/11�+� � }� I I i uJ la�ul MOtl Rlwlve� 8'I ��`��`J�`\`\ � I 'I/�i �— \ \ I I II � \ � � i I 1------- � � � I � �i i � --_ � �� I r � � �� \ �� ; � � ' � � \ 1 � \? � �� o0 ii 1 a � ,� � � � � „�W JJ.00_'____'�_I � � 3N39 J I I I I \\ 1 I � � a I,��--r-�-- m —�� r I I \\ � 3 7Ay �j � � � �.�_ / 'nni iv-i � ivnn i� i[�nl�i \ I 8 �' � I I —� G �_L vr v y v iC i�vivi _7v ii i�iir_ I z *i 3htl � $�� s I I � � niniivi�in �^nii��ii �n ini-iinii�iv ,--rn �i�^--inininni ?_ .. 3^d � W�W lVVI1V1�_VC.:.:IVV�_i _JV iIVJYYI��VC�_Jll IV1V.:_�IVIVIYY I � �� g� ygj I I I . 5 � � I I � I I I ntl 3ntl 5; W � ' TJ � �w g�� II �_�_ ��VH,ui io r/� � � •3�n NxJd� �� -----L�L —��. . ,o.w,�.� ---------- ------------ � o -------- ------ � � � s , , . i � .�FQ��'��;��.E�r��. BA zooz��°°��..R��o�.w��E,�.r�Q��E I BAHSR ABBOCIAT68,INC. I 1FpM1.110N CRWDED BY OiKR3. EY61NC P20JEC15CONqilON4 SNAIL BE VERFE� ARCHIl'ECTB iD6COVEAED 514L.BE REVORiEO i0 iNf HItpEER. �ES.LR LM55Rl5 � O � LSO 90IlTH FIP1H BTAE�1 Or/g'�nol Genterline of Woyzafo..--.. _I 9iRTIDlaY6 ML\'NBAPOLIB.dZ'S5908-180U Bou�evordperkL51156 __�_------- I \ __'—_�_�_ —_ I TEI.EPHONH:818.89B.BB01 _�_�_�_�_�-_—__�_—_—_�_—_—___—_�_ I FA%:819.99B.SBBB ---------- -- — BOULEVARD � — ---- --- --- --- ------ so�en Po�v�e or,my��m —1 - _ I � � Porsche of ----- ' Minn a olis WAYAZATA Bo�,e� d F R s�,ss �. --------------------- -- ----� e --1-------------- --- ----- , P ______ __ 9191 Wayzete Boulevad ----394------------------------ --- -- ------ --- -- o . ---------- � � --� -__'_______ I QldwVdlryh4J554M .. '_____________________'___ ____---_-_-- —_—_— "__ _—_ _______________ "—"—"____'__ --- ------- HIGHWAY -- ---- ----- INTERSTATE N�' 7-24 ---- -- --- NC 2 � — ----- ---- ---------"_—_------ �F b�VA Y PL A T �o � P�F�TATION 1 RIGHT ' Przeunwaer wo e nr,r amia — _ I P�uniNae. nar.a.zmia —__— —_� FINALpJp JI1LT10.1014 - - T— MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANS, � o TRACT c � o �' _ , o � � so�«e,r Row�,�e o�F� ,____ . � � � � ---_____=-- ee.nr,�ofe,oo�No_sz�a� � �� ; INTERSTATE HIGHiYAY N0. 394 _ ��__ �-�- ' 1 — —� __-- � �-i , � - - _ - � I ------�----- �------ — .. .. ._ :.- -_ " "� .. ..,.�.. -- ---- i , --- _ �� ------- � —�-�— - ---- --- "—� i -- � i� "_ � �---- ----- I _�-__ --- ,, L _ -- . r 1000 __ / �_ - �re6T � ____ - �,,�,�.-� r.:m °K�. ..�-�� / /, _ __ � - rt- �«..�.., i � , i -� � E��r�g F � �f � ✓ -------------- � i, —=`��.�-�-`� ��... , , I , ----�- �, , o�P,oP .,,,�e.� - ; �o.a�. � __ �—�- _,�... I�- ,/ ,---_ o -' - _ �-� , . r-- "� � i � ��i '� _so�ra<.yeowu�e�rNgnwoy v°�a pu r _ .�'a � f � �� I � �„.,a I me�t pe�Doc n�o.558949 - � /�� i�� ose - ,---- _ �-_��` � ��i�a t��c r�a� i,�-"I,. - i � ' i � �� , _ ��' �� . �T�,{��+rom,es F�.� no �s j� \/ . �� I � � - ..,.. �s � i ;-� �- �� ,�o�...m ��, �� I � � � �� k , ! �� .. t_ vo d a6 � I I /// � � S ) ,\ y�\ f" �' 4 � � � i e�- �u �, �, �"�= V ��•^ � � � � I � � �` � � = �� i � �? ` .�� `., �! �,a � i i I / � � � `� ti� � `�la`��, �� ;N? i i i � ,r�- , � ` { c � � i i I � �� I. �:i..i� � z°w°o° � I .., � � ' � '.� �- t ^, ,;. A � �1 � � � � ' ��. � i � j , -r .". ' �> �4 ��,�. 1� � 1`.;6 � � i � S'�, '.9r� ,�,.�K....m . � ". {v� i`,� � �I�„g�-� �-___--_______�_L \ I I I I Wafe.ma�n Easeme,t .�, . � � '4 9) vP yP,'� I I per poc r o_St812�2 �, � ' � i I . � ni .� � ,'�"w 1 1 � I I t � ° . "� �'\ '^e^�,'""e" �a,,,, � I �- - '1000 I - ��" A __-_ }-�I I " ,g '� . � e.��:o� `: I v . _—I-_ � � ,� .a., _.�.ro i ��"� I ow„e�i��ee� I I r-�_J � .; � ••-�"'°'�'"� Po�sche of Mmneapolls .d� �- I PIO O6 111212 4 0 02 6 I i I �� i 9197 Woyroto Bovlew d =✓ I , o I i I ?'^ "' � ' 12994 9 t. I � � I � 2 ,� ; � � FFE 8 � o `1 98 00 2 �`, o. o C� � � ....� � i � :��,, .� . .,� I � .�e � � 3).96 �i� i I � I I � n° ;�vt�...�s°p € ,. W �..� � n�(a �--�-z� � I � i � � � �r "� p�f ( � I ' I p m +*C �,�� , b,a .y. '4 0� � � I � I , P� �$ „m..� o\� � I I 30 ! I i �,rf"�r LOT 1 � � \m ..,.m„ � � � q 'fi lood i � o , /� � �° 1 � j � � ? �, l�� Aue�oeoiersn�p a� � �, d,„ d�' � �.. � if i I v� /�I I ____�I� ��n,N�f tlnee . �'� �,�,$ 93933FFE690�OO�ev d A B -ci,.�...a�� \k �� I I m_; , / o`m I 9 � � �F I I � " '9 � , 9 I 6 _ �soo � �- � v�overy � , �' d -�.�I / _� . � �.:: -. ` ' ......m ,. -.._--_ _ _ � , �soo �, �,- � ... w � -�� AUTOMOB/LES � � ��`� �� ,� ',._� �'�� —i--- � Fo��d�o d„o�P, � � , � � „ � � �. � �� `,� . ' � ,..�� oPe Pe. / � � A,.�„�,,, ' �:� � �- ,� . ' ��.', ' I,,.. ' u�e�se No_ro9as �� ''`° < ,�`e55� «,o�, ,„� _ o IfAYZAT9 BOCPLEVARD , _ � � � -�, '� � ; p mmoasrean�or �.�,� �« . -�. / � � l ��.,, r� ,< < . ; w y eior Nc 2z za �, ""�� °^ f,� �-r d.�ss � � / - \ � : ;� . . �� - .,.� iroi � l �c deo q,r ,� ; k . .� .� � _ _-_ _ _-_-_-- / � � � � � � �� I _Fo��e M�aor -T-_ / � v, / � , t' ... \ � � �"�. Monunenf / � �� fi/.,\ . . . „„�Z� '-'': V� �� `�° �a�x Bata i . � � � / � . w � , ` , I ;� � .. �� o . �� [✓ : s"� .tl" ' ' '" t 4 �}' � . ��,pe° � �"�� u � � .�:� :r� " � � - _� � � , ' � • • ' = , _ ✓' �'�.,` ;/ . � < _ - ._?+,, a �S° o�� -s_ao � � � � �' .. FINAL PUD i �� j ^ o, t " '��' � ��r� � i ' J U LY 10.2014 �/� �� ,��. �� d �x � ge� �a��r� �� J. �S saor I /l� / � � .. '�� \ E ertv tr �.` =� �� d I �� :�9 9 d t tY ES e( .�- ` P t of C l � / z �,p .. I • • /% �`.. ;-vu;t, pi� r c o ei' a�moe� Pvo f _�o� �.. � !_ F O R M . , ' t o�',es P U 0 No 95 �'"" � N 95 � �� i � // / / ' . .e, ' '. ..o. / t C' Fio f�� - �/ � / � � �� e . �� : �� - �� . _ - J i � i _� '�� reA� � � �4 LOT 1 *��g won i Y i , i -"f� ... �7 a * .� .^ 1 ,q. ��p�. �ossamrmn�mue 1ei saxnzomo .a� � / / �f .. '- ^� y,--.�. .,�� r - b' 7,` -'•-_ __ ' � E�'�' wosis r.� eix.z�z.eon � I � � / � ��/ �.a � � .. S �� ,.'itafi �. ' �A z� �� : Cw�er CitY of St Louis Paik� Mln�wpoa MN55W1 Web IUMNmne� � '�;,' � --- _-` ,m.�"'-�.._ � 1 —'� .. ."e..gb.F �f"`°°I -\ � \ PIO 06])]2�240018 � m, , .> �a -- ��^ ' �- "" �— --- � s� 1 _ \Orono9e ond J(��ty Eosement I _ �.� / / / p . „ .,w � '" ,^• :%' ...„. �-.;�-Y� �.w�^''� _'��.•,. / a �ert'�evotorcv�or.seJ � I —_ � e F7_ti'c,' % 0 / a..,. ..x. aer.eec� . .. � r,� � , ' C ' � � �..„. W� •w ,�>„� ' � • Automobiles PU.O.No.95 / �� e w �<... r .� �/ �. �� '- " , „ ' .,w., _ ,..... ___..__� . ._ .-. _ / G �Areo Nati S t I ur m/ _ .._ - .:.. � � q =__ eos oc N ws. d '� '". - � ", '� .. ._.. - . / -/ .G aomo ��. I r - ,, . ; ��o .�WAY�A7'�A � �� N .ne,�sra�as Pow�=� �� .� � � . d�, �� :=Po�d `��, � � ,soo , � � • .�� , c�n Rec Doc No 80t210 �., r . ' "` �.•• . ,/ � I / - ... .. .. ^ f r r� �o n � � rt nc � a �. . �,L » -� o W ll/d t a. IMT]e,mt� / -.� I � / � � Ex�st `^ E f per M DOT � y- —___ __ 1(2 /_e NW 114 ., � I MlE ___' �_ _____ . �R<to 9gWl� Rgt f4„yPat.ro. . - ______ � ' I — ___` L 1 __ _ � _____ --�- -- --- r -- --- --L ---- -�---- -- - - --�-` 7-_� 1 _ -I=� . � -- ---z�za --- % --ssa � a�� __ 1 \\ j I ___ ___ _ .�__ _ _ _ / ____ I Q v-t � � Fo✓ntl Ga d lron Pi msun•� ma.ve --------------I-- O(�` � / � License No e)2043 Pa,_i ^ I I I i �� / -------__ Q`�O,` qO� 1 / e I V' � i � ow�e�v;i;oge��r co,..;�P��k �� --- �i�� e�w-,e� co��cos��i:o�� vio oeiiv4zaaoz�,s ao.k �� / r------------- � Monumne( � \ / � Pl0 0611]2]320029 � I � (�O Lor/Green7/eld � �m V � / 1 I � � Pl0 06Ji121320092 � � / i I I I��O�_ I � / �� I I I _______________� � OYER4LL EXISIING \ \1 / 1 _ _______-- I �!r� I ' • CONDITIONS i� ` "1 �� 1 / �/ I -----� I r.�m 1 i � � � ,...,,.,... V .�. NORTH � 8,,.,33�s �w�. \\ / ' � � �C-100 .-L__�1, . � I �,�nar.Below. m�« Cali uaror.rW�a• o ao ao , , , � Q��._�_wa.E3�4.�.s F��0�.4�.��,�.��.�� BA I �� 5��.AaSCefPnncES�BµEiw��1wE oRnRw��.s a,o��Eo�ertu�t'..wqu eE BAI�R A880CIATEP.INC. I ��wTr�ie aenu�Fit,sNnu ae cmvoseo ro rve sraucruzn�oznwNes ARCHIT&CTB I3. OR*C�Qv559HOWN nRE i0 FnCE OF G1KB a�D¢%1fRpe FnGE OF BUWING UNLE55 I 6 NOiE90rHEAw15E. 13080U1AFIFPBB'L`R&9l 8U[T61496 — — — I i 45 OEGRFE ANCIE TO PRECiION OF T� TP,VES IB INC�ES ON CENiHt AW ML'NEAPOLI9.d4N 66403-3400 aAVGi 5 T&L6PHONE:818.89B.B001 pCLE55 E+pg:818.39B.60B4 _ _ — — I 5�Pf2WJ115 FAVERS MD LONL2EiE ALNti WATZATA ELVD i0 BE NSiALLtD WIiN iH5 P¢OJECi. -— — — � BOULEVARD ________------------- I Porscheot' � -- — . . . WAYAZATA ___——————-� 1vlinneapolis ————————————————— —.——.——.——— __ acaixro or,w+c 9191 Wa9�+Boulevml __———___———.——.———————— ___—.--.—.--—.———————— _ -f —� �srw,ate 3[�st.ovt[s= sa ta Goldee Vellry�MN55476 ... — 3 9 4 _ ——— — — � °�a��=�o f �0,3= ------------- INTEI�S TATE HI GHWAY NO__ _ — oF , P�,4 T N D. 2 7—2 4 i :°�D 1��E�`�D�.aF Ac`ES�E 5i�9 E" New Facility ✓VA Y � n G I^I/ I��I OR TA TION RI GH T � P��AR.� aMo.�m�a /� ( PRELIMIN4RYWD YGY]3,2016 L/El A�T'"��N� O� I R A I `�S� � P40VpED GMu1G FIN.4L PJp JI$Y 10,3016 — � MINNESOTA rRAcr c i °�,�"`°'�""" � �s�e�g.��s � _� :�:�o��s,�s�� INTERSTATE HIGHA'AY N0. 394 _ __ I— — , — --- —.�r a�oa---_�__—__-- . —'�—�———— �— —�———————— — FM6TNG(WiNH OBt4iBE0 AREAj , � _ �_______—__ ____�___-w�i� �L_——_—�" 32.B6B 5 � ____�———————_———— — \,� � I TOTA�x(2.55 A�) IIO.B]I S.F. IOO.OK �/ ___�——� ____——'� j I waseo(wr�asrumcn a�u�wkc. /��/ ---— --- � /� �' . .. �—___=---7 I I 's �� . . . . . �_— __' � I . .. � ,� _ _ �I � � �ss n�) �os>� sc 000r �� / ___�_ --_ " �� cecfH svnw anwsenne nuen) I � �� y `"° V�' �-------' � �� x� � � � I /� � t�K \ �� I � I I 1NE GROGERtt 6 ZPFD LOIT1fRCI1 ZONE(95) // / \� I� �I � I FT iION 5 N^F0.LDW5 � / � � \ � �reA��F� _\ � �I soE_¢u FT / e - I� 'I � � Tser o Fr I I �, �� sncK��„no��,��s: I / "✓�� \ ml R I YPRo= s fr. � I ��'��i I I � �e�oNcs i �j �� /'� ..�� k �� ,'� \\�� j�3 �r------- -�— � . . .. . � . . . � 1 . �I � �� , . � i�� j�I � � � . � i� I ol � � � � � �� . . . � I � � � <� � � � ml i I � �� . = I I � � . ��J acsea ro �,�nzeeo vEw � / 9i9i wonora eo�i°w�.d � j I � � I o . ��/ 12984 s9.k. I�� I I I I �� i. FFE 898.00 �� I I . ' � � p ` I I �� ... ,. �'�� .. � 4� �� I I I � - p�2i� :� ..�, � � I I �� --�----------- ---�,.� _-�----- —� i � � � � � � ,' ��,'� �� I �y �/ y� � ' � � i � .x :� �'� �` � LOT 1 �-' I I � � ' � I /// / � Audr Oeolership I I I I 9393 Wvyzata Boulew�d I I i i,- � F'}i�/ i� �; � 3].360 eq ft � # �p' � / 4 / �,. I i � FFcso,oa � , J�se�,�.�— I � r � `��`� ' � � ( # :� :,�s� %� -----�-- i � �-' _ , , i' � i �� 0 ,-' � — ,��,.ss., ' a / /I � � ,�� I �� waYzara Bor�iEvan� / I � / I/ / '�' I i ' � I / �� P��n � — ---- --- � � /�� ,� �°� � �' � �� ,�� —�—— � , �,�, � /� � � e��, I / � / ' �� ' �� . � � / , �� z°�' � ,—, — I �� , � � �� .a � �� J �� yP° � I FINAL PUD �� ° i l�� '�� ,s m � � J U LY 10.2014 ��/'� /� / � �� '� i '° I � i ; ; , � � ,- �, � . . �� / � ` � � I ' - F O R M i � � � / /I /� ' .. c� � .�.f�� /i se°°�F q I r,o s oF�m _ � . I , 9 � / // /—t— --- --I — I __ 3 u Irv n��n IN sl9cK � / •I — �O� � I 1056oN�FXT�vwn T.'612.EI-BO]0 � �—�--- F,Oe51] Fo�. 612-152.BW1 � ' %e.::/ / , ----- — � I MlnreeWl4�MA65101 WeO: IantlNm.m� / / /// ' "' /s,// � '' // , , , -. x i, . /ri,i/ %�/� _5' � � a w � � � 4 I " i a. ,a i �� ` .. . ..... �� \ e,r..,.�. w... ,� .�.��.�� ------------------------ ��_ � i j ———— ��.� � "' ,o�..,�..�.�.,..�.,> o/'� �� WA YZA�TA �� /� %' �� ' � i � _=�� ° ° � i _ �,.�m„ , � � ..�s �„� -- i ��` -�----� -- I — \ // �--- ------------------ a,...,.. I �.�I I ------—� ----- Q��N �1 � �--------�U' C�I pN � / � � I��I � .��.�' \ 1\ �/ /// I L I��P^L———————� / OVER4LL SIiE PLAN / / � '--�I � �1 I � e • �� -'s�" G200 � / � 0 \ / ..... 6A413039 / 02014 \ '� � � I CC�b,alo�rolYW a0 . i , , , , , � �. Q�.��w�E�,e.��,ns F��0�.4,�n�w.��.�� BA ; � � ,- , , � � �,� _ � z .��R��:�_°��,��,,�F�� I /� ( \ siAwc nw+cs ww ne wcnu r�s�au ae HAHSH ABBOOIATFB.INC. / ��/ R[9oRw i^s�nw�r�ac�iru�.Wie sH�u.�ca�wn�xeo�o�1 u�cti�ESE . ARCHITECTB I � �' � � � azaz.a s,.rr.e. ' . r a oznvmcs � � �� i�� ' Nareo mxea�wse neE ro r-r,c�cF cuze ua�Exremoe cme or eui.oxe i,u�ss I 4. �I�EA E GOAKNG STPLLS WttN R I NLN WLE WNiE GAM 5 ON CENiER�rD 1W BpDTHFIFTHBIR&9l I / ��/ .. / � ACCESSOEGR[£ NGIE TO P'ECf OFE¢PVii[n SiWVES B NpE 9U1TE1645 MI.1'NBAYOLI6.MN SWY-]400 II / '� /// �� A R FT6LSPII089B.SBBB•�8.6801 i I � j � o��. ,��RE.E��w..�,.A�w,o��.A��,r�.� ' Porsche of I � � I � � ,' � Minneapolis i 9191 Wa Baulevmd I I / / i \ aEaIRED v�acrC . Qo1dm Vemll�ry.bAI55436 —I ......\ Tarn�vuwre o[rw.axeEs uo/s= as ea �– —–� � j � � � ,so„�o0o New Facility � � �' s.w s Q�P � i � / / �A.,��A,E��a�o�.aF A«Es��E s.w s �: I / PRELIHIN4F"WD BMGTI016 I � /� PRELIMINnRrPJD Mdr1D,30W PRPIpED VAfKNG FINAL R1D .NYY ID,}01I I I ., �.., / iOiAL�GAA KIN�C 9iPllSTR2TNf0 563 fA /// � � 6� � �� I I k,�°� ' /� . : I / , / �.��w.,.,�.�,,�.,s.F. �.bx .�e 3z.� I , ' � 1 .o."°`a oe �F oo� � 2gh � , i� �n�la.zs n<) �e.003 s. . � � � , � �� o(um«oor�.re� I i �� vous w I v �cn�as a o aa I I ai .orA�a.ss n�� eo.e�3 sF 000x � � i � r'` �� 0 c eEx�uE anwscnvE naEu � � a � � �'� ' ,�� ` o ,�E��Rn s:��o��w:o , , . a,d� �� .� , LOT 1 ��qs, , � � , -� � — Fr no�_��,_ I � � . ��F:`35�F�, � , , �_p F. �.��,�F��,= � 'f � . Audi Dealership o,�sE.a�� r�, �� - caor.r...ao-35 r-r. � I �,�� ; _ 9393 Woyzata Boulevard i �� o�;? 1 ' `: � Q��` �`` � � � �� 37,360 sq. ft. "� � �� r � 4 � � 1 � , l � � �! �q.��ti'`� ' � FFE=901.00 � .' I � � �' �� / / ' " '�' � / � * e � / i .'e . � � � R o. � � �� / � : ,f' ��a � a � a �� , � , i � ' - � , a i '� � � i o �' i ,� ° � � i � � �� . � � � I � � �� : � PORSCHEOFMINNEAPOLIS � � � � � \ � �� FFE=901.00 � � i� 24,?AOSF � � �� :�K�sr"�"` � /� � � j ino.� , . / ' / / o � � �'� � � � Q � � / / / /s. % 1 ..� eas vmt en� / / Q �. � a�z � . � i � .� � � � � � munee �\. . �� / t/ / \ / � R1�5' '. O • 4 B0.LAP0 � \ � � � � �. p � m:-� i/ sh '�� a�� /. � /� � rytib � . a �.� / � \ . //� / � � �ccf e � s�N� w \ � . � � � � � ^°� �� ea�- � � yti /" j� � � �� " 4 ew'^°'° � � i : i " , �_ � . " / ry�o° � i c�' e,s�ll • FINAL PUD m �� y `� � i � � \ � � JULY 10,2014 � f� �� Q � � �° �\ . �j.�� \ ,.�/ y i I ' � ', /•- ��R' I � '.. l � � � g� e.s. / � ,V • � / a � 1 .�� a a> 3 �� - F O R M / f i � o, mry , _ _ . . , / —_ s �. �:o��a��4s F��o�a��aF��E=,z,� BA � _ — ��,,� � � qa<w /�... - a9{ �"0e 9 ra.Eaa.nro cQo��•��"��u��a�i�ano BA�R AB90CIATFS.INC. _ \ \� QHseEro� AROfi1TECT6 � p `e`h s � Q�c��v�:H�Fxcry'css aacnHc rurcwn�vrcw vzna oWuufnpvawu�� / . T�� 9 0�e�=Eo ��\' � 5. eo,�cee�Aew.o�vw oFW z'v�°"soisv Fws�en��e�^ u�rs oF (Not F�� _ _ 150fi09TIiFIFTHB1Ri�)L PROV�E MW. 9IIPP6149S I � . \� 6 C4 i0 4�¢UC1U4N.SVEGFiCAnLN9 F04 EA4Tw0e[4C-aL4Ei2Hf9 FAt(e:11.FE0uG MAB:919.98B.60B8 �'� y ` , TBLBPIIOIVB:819.888.8801 � , vAos I \.!l'�•w, .' e o r�ow�af T�so'i"�co`e�"ae sxtl veaFr rHe ac+wvu ac aQcnnc un Porsehe of � / � ?NSuinBlt soLS µMD caNAclION Aro vRaVoe Pe2pDic a9oaTs /° � 9 �,�F„��.�r FLL�.�,�..��KN s�n..�.o��,.oF�o Minneapolis � � � cqroAcnoN EaWnEn1 To aBiuJ 54ecFEofcoronciaN r�Ra�'Ha(��FT. 9191 WayWeBoWeva[d I �� ., .....,� � I 009:TOR�0.5R1 0698)�E%GEPi�1�E iW J FEH WN�1 9NW.L��Q9ACiE0 i0 GO1dC�V011 y.MN 55426 � "�,•�`�'��'��•W��FLL°E°•"e%L� New Facility r, 041 OU po�t�PACfK1N OF rF bN PRAGTICES MT MIMIEM i14E0 IN I / \ ....,. KiLM n 0.4 9NW W BE Snl.��SCnK9 M'0 i4nIXED. �� PRELMNGRTNO 8MGT2016 � PRLIMINdRY Plp ,"idY 1D,�OIC � GMAL P1D JLLY 10.]q6 f\ I D � '� \�� ¢tT U FLA 2n EIYVAtpNS Lf LATLN BAS'NS ��E�OiKitWEE. SEE , / � j� �� Srs� � r rw rwrc�exer�c�ae. veovo�o Foor rRn�srtan. � t �� 9 �. ap vav u�wais�u�m TT� I = E 0�s 9 ...� .. o nr(n�nor z3n7(nwor z3eo sruenz<oe) n��rwo.�3�c�uss�3je� I �qo .. . � e carvo.crE�lrewFna(nTwot z3so sr✓etaaoe) ` nt(nwor z3��)(nwm zxo svHwss3ce) se(rwot sue.ares s) �� \ ... carvAcreo vsso� , �o �`:. o a�-reE�Waea.Wcre ax a000�s4 Sz-ex u2 evrau�o.nnx.n•s�uv `` q� c 401'VACPso rCni0.0w5E(i'Woi 3uB.0.0.95 5) 0 ' � �';y � ''� d. OHCREiE ORNES.nPRaA.nrp Fx1EWOc°1neS �Lj � 0- 12 Hli2ANE0 IM%4 YUI1F , F i �,� s . �i�.�zeere.e'a�uc�Hesz�z n � /" o� -->�. 3 ��ro: � � �oo . � �oor"Pu�reo�sa.a�mwo,3�.�.ss s� ° � � I w55/ �. � . � " ` � � vnv es / �� _Xa ' c\� �'.�.: z�orn cacse.vnweo sra+e I � \ �r ` , . . w. c corn evs%rsE�wns�o srore p � �� .�.�� '`� � �. e� Audi Deale�ship �� F� 9393 Wayzata Boulevard � °"�`�'°"'s i o�� o�.so ,,'. . ° . � . .. `� o sPe.�,�o�E.o..w�,�o�rs,�M�o�s�,LL � ".� �a�� o oq�� e � '_ .` 37,360 sq. ft. a �Pa��.o�,�.�,w aQE.��, � � �' �� `� , . 9; � g � g � �' ��` °��g��L°1 00 �`� FFE=907.00 � ��%��s�"w�w� �a o o FEE.�e�s�o��-�z � 6 0 e.o �`�� .\ �.a / �� 9 9a oa.zi .. ` . uae To ess cvee n�n nmEa � \��\ �iRn�moN fROn o��tV2B qNo curTEe ia BaR cu26 nHo Gur1Ht 'D " �' \ �..,i a �♦ ..W. \ °P mn �� 'yao • �� • � • -• • / / � \ \ .\' ` . � OF GaEreLCitaa G�MROLS CPWR�iO B�E4WdJ¢EAS�COA RBUiNGA¢W OCF � N / D � z.3�: zn 9' � ♦ ' a . �v�.na.eHr�r srneuzco u,o�wE^vo�ac a�c vre nN . .'^��n :.. o � `` / , unwu�Eon vr�TvzncncesOsw�n nze 7�e o�ixesNwK sc.coue aveenna�e ra � a�d ��.� �� soo� s,� , , .�� .�� . � F I � (03. .a a , � �` eo.,gx �' SEOPEM CA4RED BY WW OR WqiCR�10 PREVEM EROAON AW LOi.�I¢0� / '• ' •. . z� re .. \� I . � � �i`Y:DFED ��EQiLIiER SINLL tIK'L i�lE¢0.10��EC£ICAiA'M9✓J�5 GF }g � �s � �COMLETNG 6ttPONG N EACHeOREP N � � �, 0 \ SOJ . ` �� / g �9B) � ..� �� .. ns \'� \ o .. SEE�D ttCOt 3B�8 V , oo� a.^ go� SG£ / / � „o,s � oo PORSCHE OF MINNEAPOLIS .. ��" ` �onN TY�z5 5 a R � /-k� � � � .s� FFE=901.00 s � ,� �, � �n aa3oa�ia� ,�Aar . /' ,:.. . 24,240 SF o�.�:... �� c�o.,.� .o�,iAo> / t � ... �� ...Oi.00 9/ � � 7�.SEE LMD3CA%NG SNEETS FQ2 PERIIANENi TWF ESiN&SHIEJT. xzh / f ��90_ 9 4a�o0 0 1 1 .` �� z9.s�Q�.o�.a,.,�.�,�aE�ow..�o��E.��E�. -1- � �,�z�,QB `�,� • ' . �� z�, � �-s� �o� � � o a° �� ,�,� � ' � �� oos� � � � . �p� .r��,� .� �s �s � � �' � �Pam oo � � �Es ��a� / f .s� �s 0 � �s � Pop�LL � , 96e .,�,s a a�oa 9oa •�, 'ao : ,, o(g3m7 4t os - J �}� �, � o 05. o .. � � , - � P � i � �� <a c�ae - o i.w � (�� • oig'o ��: .• � �' i( � � /// - � cvTT � . . . s '�\ . , 5 i �oo�� . ��`� . � 1z oe u, , � � o �o o.eoe, oi.do sur ( >��oo.00 F.a. I .�� v � � , �� l ) � z EncH � i n ' i � � .a...._�____ 9�r�� ' �,i oan aae s °°s oioo �� .�:� �°� �� c .a',�6 � __ T � ��' �az o�'� r.vrrFu �� 4 i ..I` . ae ;�� .r4cf reaTccrpu ezevErz To oer,u M eE�ow7 .. / 9 �. .. u' aa.as �s ��' � `e5 6 .. *0 I e�3z.a e aaas e . . < � �� ... � � i 902 //,-�� a 0100 5,�ttP.��l 9 � es�w \ .��P:�� j . , . • � �• x o�3� i FINAL PUD / a ,0A �sa � � "� so� P0 i e e JULY 10,2014 �� . � �° �� oa. �. o � o � ob ' j '° ' �� s F.o. ' x�;<�' � � � _ � t . . mza . oV 2 cuze ti y<5` / e �3 e�' I � / ... �•,. ,curree - 0.�04 ,�- • 90 .. � 3"� I '. �� / � � e.o. srs ,e.� . �`'� ga - . � / .,a,��.. / . .�' earz e e �'� . ' I 90 „ � � � � � '�� , ., o � ,s �urr �.va� � �o,s a a I cu � I - g O R M .....v � /� o i i�.zs.. � a�oEA �� eelnv.).. ' �..�aas 3' ..{.. ( ) .... soo. vomsi:ioF�:n � } � .� es99 � { :,., �� a / go3. I as ` �3 -� ...�., �„ese..m.s.,.- aa,es, x o , } .9a , � . � P .sosv � o eb. a000 F.� �� ,—, / ��\ ... . � / : � eq , � . ,. so5 . � �,,,, so,e ao :�... ,�. o ey so,l, � Po� \ � er'' f emmF�nww 1x a�z.az.eoro .� I o� *90,. �T o00o e ` 6 .ns� S•. rn� eeiz �� I .. � a... � -. oi[ �s,. " . 6vo519 Fn� 81Y.25Q.A01I �K�'� �w� ( v.)�� . �an cvae x I . � � I �fia') \ . iaMram.r�w .,ms � . ,, � �e u`.',.m• ix so 5v*r�a ,. .. I ; � ,,,, � � � e ,� ? �.w r.wsswt ww ' �, � I� - . ,! I '"i°z- �;� o.� � ar I �.�x a'. o�� z c�ko e �50� �� '�° � �� esn yor' so�A k � ' 9 . " ^ .�.. , e .a� o. 3 s� � � o� o za '�"� ,o � g�� , � . . - , ' : .oo3d , I�� ♦ /�� 0 j " �� . .... � � - °f � '" ,o�.,.�.�..�M,. 9 �� ( ) � �� ; ...,w „ d . . � '� a m. � ``` ,,, z �a �� ..,,,01 • e O"!0. � ' . \\ I '� �q, " . .� § rsaa ..... .,rx.............sa 3;. 13� .--� . � i a � ......�..,....{�'iA.. ' i � •�. ..... � . "' ..,...,,,.,,....,,. . �.,,,.,,,...e"'" -. _„ a� 13e ..............+ePZr°m,,._.......... .....,,,„y,y.9.........,..........,.., ....,,,...,,...�`5 � .-��egn a\ .. :..., sz j �` + � ... PRNECfFMPN6ERREViEW ~9� iRAGYJrC PM 9 �� a�� '• � .. . - .....y� .,,..,..,_., , '� � 2. �`-� ..... .. .... . aoz_. . '�.sw�'," . .,",.;oor.�. aa.00� ` �xe,�e ueru�ren remccriav�vics veae ra srner a�a+o ao�rrvj ....~�``, ' . ,� a � .. � . ` � Qnc�s sreci.nraosT�zs c/ic.vosrta�nr�oev��rtfo, rn�ra � _�--. aoi ' eys,. � � �--�. mP _ � o o�:�Pa.E,�.�s�..�„�,�a��s oEe �,�M�t� aa ,s_..� _ � m�� x... e . ,, .. , ��_ .�� . ..r , as,z s49 p!1 'g� �� -�" � }9j9 TREE PROTECTION ,�0� a4a . _ ass> �� e,�, -,- e`°' ,�s e�; — ,?: � .�s„ � ,sso � �„ ,9as NOSGIE �� r ,ass+ � �� 9 5 �� ,s,o ess �o .e,os .99„ .�s, �� .ss9, . � �,� ,es�o `0g6 `0 ' GR4DING,DRAINACsE, .BssS esa, ....ssa� e�e9 � „6s -...... e� .aa^ " �...• , � PAVING.�EROSION �-----�=-'�0--_ ", a�> � �e CGNTROL �' nssn e99� _ _ . _. essz ,gs_ ga� � 1 9sa� e°6 ess• 9360.. � • . �.6 gba .. _... - -, NORTH sa. r.�m ei..w� � � � �-�s� C-301 ��n�,Below. �'A'3039 m 2014 �. CO��bslon yau dlp. 0 20 40 , , i �. � / �/`/ , n�/� SiORM SEWEA � �(40!9RI 9i DpRD^�D3034.OM65. BA N � �Pc 9 , ��/ �- snnrtner sewrx wc�soa�s(nsm srnwneos osox oxssn,caaq ��R A990CIAT68,INC. � , � 4. c sezhcE aeovoees we c[i.o�xntarv or s[Trvets�z Hows ARCEiITECTB � ��oo Un�Y / � � � 56 3. COCRa9_D�N4qE W�TNSE2RV1LEt5 i0&IIDNG G¢OV�E h[SiWL.NATA2FL CAS A � ^/ .... � 0 F�� cerEO) w 15090I1TfIFlFffiBTRffi // � , , DLqNG uilM Ib�TNLAiex�TO PROiEGi ADJACENi GRRERrv HLIN1 DMALE BjRNNID�pOLIB.Ml�SS408.1400 M` I ' 5 on csHiea or siaucivaf io eErrtE¢oc siaue.uae ��i;��'s18.ase.aeol �/ � /y�S/ OR HO OF ETID 5¢Ciiori FAB:919.99B.SB88 PPE IENGfHS 9110WN ME FR I � �< /l I ? JJST SiR W12EtWTNNI.LL'YM CUA1CiNE IIRrtE4 qNLY WiN PI'EMS p "�"°�""`�E°�T"�° ` porsche of � .. � �; �c' o�.. �,R�,R�s F�.Qa��s�oa�Eo�� , �� r^��^ Minneapolis � / �i � a cow,ecr ro an urvres N nccoaouice vru em w caneri vnuEr sra.r�nxos. 919t WapehBou4vmd I / .. . .. 9 ec�oss�w eO ceurttt awF�excrHs raE�u�t wrsue sevnanrai ar sewe2 C�oldw VAry.bII755426 a �s� wF ,�w��F,�,s�,�.�,�„��, New Facility i ��. ��.�.�r�.�s�n�� . "a r/� � � NA4G'uP2K3 OEP�RiI'LNf./.T FFELIHINPRY WD BHAT 1014 �/ J69.599b098 FQ2 FLUSNNC AW G¢ESSLF£TESt I�PECiIG9 FRELIMINPRY WD !'1AY l3.lml4 I CONNECi t0�OVINSGbJi W N iRfufATMI&.lPriG GfRWt ad0 eartE i0u5 Oe'i FlNGL RID .WII.T 10.1014 /� �fW0 40ViE&.GONG Si0Rf1 ORA19 Ntl COMELT i0 St0¢I1 SEWER rv.tN0.E.� / � SEWER. I ai'FxBT ��j// �........ 9g 14. k5il,LL CRIGPiIGfI SLfEVES FWN511f0 BY RRILATWN CLMRACiOR T �`� �B 0¢o�DEO 1IR11Y NO� i0 90020 �l g ��. E%A59 �IE�EI.EOEiA6. . RIC AW L01YnAT9 9NALL BE N9iPLLED BY T Gi¢ICu � �`W5�)-8913� /� J .,. . . ��RPON�E�2GY�LL��N^6�NrMD�1PLL�AWMCSftF44 �Nhb LF SERIKE u o r Y ie Pv�c �� 05 CAi ��''��FG .. � �,� Ov10ETC�PLUrt�S FOR L�PBIE��L�Y.NEP1�OiHER H.EC�iRIXK Cq81hHCRi1�N. �� YSiEn.S�DA,teD Ll1N 0 FEEi C.T�E ALL OLKilp15 6 THE S A LROANCc WTM YNJESOin ��. RUlE3.PARi 4162810� � ��@ 05 LOLAIE Ex NG IELEPN4TE SERVCE AS SNOwN LOORGNniE RELOLniW1J WIiN �. �s" �CENN¢rilrK6i . � �s�7-�aa�aai � . � . ,� �vamecr nm/oz nn,us.ex�sruc ucvr oa�e N oaoEa,o usrr.0 su+reer sc-mt �y(�9 // SERocnre nalu�CN1 scN N o¢ocu r ' � _ /� �d �� . . _` �2F1 0 N54u1 SnMlPRT sEWE2 SE¢VICE. I �(SW'o0'OIA R� � h� P r�J �t- `N 5 u` �� 005: R-19z Fs �E �, � Audi Dealership � a � �� ;�� 9393 Wayzata Boulevard r �� ✓�� , � 37,360 sq. ft. � � � p � � ° � �� BAo� "��,. �' �g�� ,�� FFE=901.00 �� i `n'°� � � E � . �Gp//�� B9a�.]] .�\ , / R11 90 50 �5 .� Il(SE)-E95 /� / < � • N{3)�931/ / 20 B NVq B9��N � i R Kaz �� \ �95 \�� i4� � � �� . �i ;ra ��` ,�� , ��// �s � r� � x, �� SA. �'�� o� `"` � r � , � � , ��,�� o=ax � � �.�.� . � h ��; PORSCHE OF MINNEAPOLIS \ corr.�crµoweruc �- � // / � ,��,E�.�,, � '/i v .,� � �"� �v3' PFE=901.00 � "� �' � n,�zn �/ ��/ �nssc�� i�� ,vse�ss 24,7AOSF wveas� � � a e.T.:E vu.ve � i ootic� �� e�n°z�c ` 4" ��, gi � ��_ .. � � A ♦ am. � � �� i�.�ae � s ; \c \.�� / �% � � \ � .. W>q .9535 �j \ \ �€` �� ,/ � $"/ / \ // b S \" 2 '/TlPCA ) � �� / �>"112� �� .�� . � , �� ,/ � � W� t0 . / 1 � M B99A0 / � N�(SW)-B95.B0 i � !.i �� ^� �� i+tsereveo �n� �r`?�` � � � - � ea3eo � /' '< ✓� / ' / � mnrr oene.e \g \�� va rc � I \ � / Y� / � � � � � / / / � A m � �� . �� , , , , �; , � �� , �� , , i �, .� , I � �� /� �� r ' � . � � � ,� � �`�� , , , _ �� i i i '�`3`�°' �tn �� o� � � i RE946' FINALPUD � � � �. � � / �� o. �. � � � JULY10.2014 , i / Q`�R� �,,� �\ 'o � I �/� / /�--� � ��. `� =� �" � \ �\ . � � , �E . ,�= i , r z/ sq........�w � o/ ,... \ .. i i / 3 s�s '°px `°' ss e ave � .. . . V � • • a �� a� z .az ��.� eewr�cf.m.> � � �c,s �� c F O R M � i z oszo n �°� `��« srs ovc�o sor. __ _ _ei z�wg�To oor _ ' _ .n � - _ ' i i ,., zn .\ « ��« vr J «�.��, m s\ � • . / i i � \ { � � �� . ,, 'O � .ao . asrfz.a s�t .... / / � \ eEoor s Mv j N�V 9640 ( �95s9 I � B� .�� 1�WSpMFBtli�vMus Fnc 111932-BOT yc �GS YHIS_p � I. � 4B � - �). y+p .l � \� SN!(MY SfWER / / �.• � a.0 � �� M iwW MN55001 WeE �nElamMt a-lv1 9 a� � ' '� H 5 1 'un a naz cc � n �' __ i /� �� aM-awso // � _ ... z �9l PC N.-b9715 aM�9ao3a � .... �' , NV-er135 � � .._. .. � s ra re.�arz�cn�neo�e ares�wr cax�u� i " GIgGI '.,. , a'6s1 A �`�9 6� �e :. rau ua m sex ws eea rccemum u�oro / / c / / �, � `_ : > .. �.. ' . / / .,_ � . . _ .. ro r¢¢�sr rronaw oa-uxrrta / �— — m ,. . . .: . _ .. , c� ........— ----- < m ��.... m . �_� '' ' � ..... I - - - - - --'�, -- _ �.�� _0 . � - m .. '�.. r' ' � _ - - --- -- -- - . a �' � o ' , — - - - �-� — - -�-- i�- ° �—.J / � �. - , e , � $ � : � �� ..�._.�_ _. ��.r, .�. � _r � ... ..s g..v.,t . ...� , ��- ° �'� �`�0�°� � �� ;�:W ' rLL ur� ... o. �� o, o, ur u,�-o, __. , ... .. ...:� . ... � .. �� ,', oE ,` O —°� � ��. �, ��.�_ �, �. �. �r �.—��,,.�w- �� ~�� 5.�.. . �— uT�-4�.. ur— �r� 0 �, �� '—_�r —�. �---�. � �. �, �, �. �, _�. �,—_-�.--°. � � ,�"'c �TILITIES _ � � '— �� . � � ��' �� — _______, e . _. ._, .. :; _. :: NORTH �•.:o� s..�wro. -_ -._ _ ... �, sa. � °�"-" C�01 ------------ � ------------------- �cnowwnar,Below. "'"� `""03 Call uaroo. �_�� . YW aD• 0 20 40 . . ,� ,«�.�. � � .� � � Eo� � �F a.E�� .__ .z � BA IN2A N� � � 51P211 9EWER �F SGIEDIAE�40(AS'Ri 5/ANDAR05.�0903<.ON65. . � i � , vor.E�o vEre9r�o) ' X.��,�� su,rtner B9� s. BAKIDRA99007ATEB.INO. sew rz wc svz zs�nsn srnroaaos o3a3a ozss raaq , ,,, �� _ i z ��Ta�4�� vaovrras cce cKo wcaraH ar sezvees n�+ouas ARCHITIDG'TB � =SZ � � �: .� '�� J. COORONAiE WiN GRNAiE U14�5 i0 GROVDE CtELiRt.NA'�RN.GAS.AW ' R�C�892.90� � � .... •.. CGtt1AaLAnPa SE4VICE5 i0 WLGTC 15090L1THF1FPH6TR&�1 "`°�R"°' Porsche of Minneapolis , ��""a:�'.a`ao.E`.w�"��'��an`Ran oA�� a��..� w.�xsnrorse.mv suos-�oo # _ .. � ms�.arao�::ate.ase.eeoi 9991 Wayzata Boulevard , s. �E��,r�E�a�,�,Ee�s,e�.o�E�„�oF s,��,�,� F..�:s�.�.� „ �` � 72,994 sq. ft. x 6. "°�`,.:Q�Es.o�,��A��QE o�.��o. ��.W�,e��N.s Porsche of �F.aE�,aE�,�F�.Q.��a„��oA�Fo aa�,� � �, ,, � �� ,. �..�.a��4��.�.LL��,�F��s Minneapolis � t." � . FFE-898.�0 � l � f � f B. CRNEGT i0 QiY UiLIiY3 IN ACCOR�PNGE WRH GRY OG t0.DEN VPILEY SiPNDARDS. 9191 Wfly]At�HOYINmd . . � .�H� ��. � � E 9. navrnw e o rs.er a covea a�wnrea Ooldrn Vdlry.MN 55446 � �o. ��,W..��,�„��,w,��r.a,��.�,�..�� New Facility — . ' I � � .. � ,nNrs . `E vwe�e Hs ro nnsr scpnznr�eErwF �: � ` � II. 615N803B FOR F�SrNGYAW PSHSiXiEAiESi iSPELiIqJ4��T��AT P��IMINARY WD e hAY 1m14 � `� PRELIMINCRY ND MAT 33.1014 � �Bnu eOinE Ra.n.ouL�mR,n��ES Ni0 eu.oeK vEe rccwwCu.oeAW�s. .roN FIN4L RID JILT b,f01� ' 9.� � OaFNS aW cOMECi ia sioRM�sEWER tt4N40.E. i � �� . �.� � .� � �. g�Rcr ro omuNsvwr wtn reuivrw ra c NCN wc u+o zwre Ta srcen y Q ..� � - . b.. �,.., �ERJSMUCipNE6 BY THEECOMOWUi�S SHVALL BEtANSTPlrlEOYBY�TEP�LECi4CPlT��L[9 � � 's � q�, . . can�c�rr � ..� . � .,„� ..: x saH gp �: ��zvosn e.Eacr we�waH�sr aro rcsr LOT 1 �No,F,E��FEo,�� ,e , � < Q ��m F��.b�� J ( )8 I5iAlJFO BY TVE 1£CHFNGAI.T ONTRAGTOR �.: .�, ()838 IFIE �T)� �LOO�DN41E WiN reLWWCol ArD fLELiRICAL 02AWNL5 FU2 LOCAIMMS Ls SERwCE i g3zi ( �q �v) cori+ecrar+s aw caMwnnaa oF sea�ccs wrtHu eu�w+:. � � -.,� � i;#" F E o°cw�m h �°� �s; ' ,, ", , w«.PAR.„6zazo� ��Q�,A.F RKa�.�W cx srsren�ocnreo wn++a r�r oc r� � " � '' ��"rvsr eE tes.cn u nccwnawcf w�rN rmNcsmn ,.,� � s �ce �._ » az;�srs ., V`�\. wnrcle seavee srxevee as sNowN .sw+ ' Audi Dealership * � � � � � v '��,��wi�6��.�.�,��PaE N�,o�s.w�9�,�R.TM ��E 9393 Wayzata Boulevard ,, �� a� �- �� 37,360 sq. ft. ° � ' °°� � � ee �6 9 `�' �# ae.a•° Sw� � z�aKcc�.e riow�,.s�N ozoee.o�s.ui snvrnz.sev�u seav�cE. FFE=901.00 / �>as a _ �n �o.rie .eFa�r�} �o � N " eo �o / -� ou � . .. � ¢ 641-A � �� , ..�. . / � � ,� �+"n.> . _ .__ �°x^�y•a .��,.,.wr'^` ,.� � � �'�� ." . _ -r � ` / WA YZA TA B 0 ULEVARD � � �, � � -� , � � „ � �� 5 = � �s - , . , .: , � � s , . � >, -0 , � � �„��'� � �� %;� � �"�� E-aa;, � � � o�,. � a �,•` . � � , m�° �� , � � � � � � 8 ,�� r, q � 7�", � , � � � . .r� X X — � ;" _ , X � ��, ,� � � � �� . � �� z� �-�� : � � '�� \ �� .;,� �� , E sgz9 , z= . , ,, ��a �� ,� � � , E es<6 ;,� ; ` �� tf # � �� a � , \ . � FINAL PUD . ain_aoo3a � ::a`� ,-.� ' .. , 1 �aq z , , JULY 10.2014 � ��,�.� � � � � aa.o�. � , � � � LOT 1 � o., �F�� o� - R_��,z� � . � ��.T�T�W a � � � �� . _ . ��- � � � . , , , . - - F O R M / v snemr��n # 1p55pMFAMAwnue *. �auzsz-wro `� > , � . . . � � , _ .-� ,Q. ' . ,'k s�ms�o e..�. evza�mn .. L� / '� Mnn�qoLt,1,4:�101 WM� wWMmnn � ,� / �� .. � ....Y .._µ � ,t+r�a� �....�..�.. a s.:.-._.,«„ . ...,. .. ,.� .e. ... -. ve r,� ro mat5r�mmu�wtia[wa . � � �- ,AA - --� � _ / � rnaemrMw,oex�vcw � I -� � ��'`� - �t _ {�.,. /f� � _ , er.ces wre.M.va p,. �' �� i � `` `�� ` � �� y _ � - � ,;%;,. �E��.�F�� pl1 � — —— � � G� - � = '�O c0�s , ��SANItART SEWER LAYOUT � Q � . .-,.:.. .:. NORTH e� r.sm� wawro. � � On 05-13-K 1i��2 Klpw whol'!��OW. c�.n ia � CCIIII1YIOfY W �9 mxola Y aD• 0 20 40 , . I ` n�a"�e�Ra��Q�:��.3r,zoo�aQ�o� BA E��,,�� eereareo er uror�oen exvaesAv�rce r�wT^vao.ecr. n gAI�R AB80CIATEP,INC. uiu?rpiaaraNs�o 6e rEio vEaicyn�vaoz'ro�rcnvn�.aN j�ieu nc�GSF ARCFiIT&CT8 IEs n4E NOiC9.ME C+�C�e4 9wiLLD BE R1EA'A1eLv NmHEo FOR 2. LILMNG R'SWN BY UGNiING PffLNT¢S,INC.GCTL9Eft 16 7001. 150 BOU'PH FtPTH BTREal 9II1'1`E 1496 uran 9cMlle MINA'EAPOLIB..�1�i 6A04-12W T&LEPHONE:818.988.8801 sr*��a FAB:819.99B.6BBB �0000 0.�50 g�U�EVAR� °"° � �a��J � porsche of �., � -a°000.,a=�'"':za�.a W�1 YZA T�1 -_ ��. Minneapolis 9191 WaymtaHouleved _ w.�.�e s�. GoWrn Vdky.FIN 5542b �.:� v,�m:nu v�o.n, �m.� corr u.., n. re. r. ' n . no. . J�g 4 su �� F� �.�« �3.0 �.o �,.99 �3.0o ew ac ty HI GH WA Y � TATE �..�.�,,,. ��M,�R.�o sno.�o�a I N TER S � �DOr t�R�pCK pARGEL vro �sW.n or nu.s�... p�cLIMINARY wv Mdr 13.30I4 � _.... ... ..ti..:�. s..sa a.��n�. ��, uc a e. Firut wo .ai�r�m,ao�a ... - � �.... � _ _... , n�w.n.h.,�n w�c�.w��.,.�o i...cw. WA YZA TA ,�`�".�" o�� . aF; o��,�g�_z�a oe aa 3s: e o�=�<�e, O s ��3 3z � zo � �� , o�� <3 �96 z<. ��9 , e ot�,< � 4 �6 � z�z=� z��=N za �3�z.°�> �, ,s �z z=4 ,s _z s < �a ��.90� �3 � 6 �� 6 �' � � T�„ �� aa i r , e n � 6 �s es � '�-�< �� 4o a a, � �o �a > o t �� az �e� , t o�,z. 65 z � 9 �� 6 5 39 e q < � W` � � � � °�r `� � � , � � a a z. � .4< s4 � ��;� � � Q 0�� 5 ev 5 gr� � a> e_ a � R 4 ,0 54 ,� poca�cH� � �� <o � o t.a. aS 4 �N e ii.s � a FFE 05800 :p�� y:e ,a a£1•� Ic �� 3 .0 3 � � � i'/9 ]� 9 "o� � e 1.� 3 � � � q y'Y' IM :. gOa a �1A � �� GDP��A. '��i?. �0 35 ��`.. BB ..� � 35:: 93 ' q� 3sa 36 u3 90�a �3 'a^ PI H�9.Z5 + e 6 50 ac n�. ao.{ ,.. � � F �� 3 . ;�� ia` 6 i �A 'as� m _ e e �_�. `I 4n< ee a.� � ��` o a �5,p u. � °n:�s� :� �e zs ..e n �,�nn e � rrt�aaiao ��. ss `:�j p�,i R �y�n.�z. Q b <.� - � � �.z 3 >4�' es oz °�'a=. ,o��r'� e, qe ��o�� _ ... � ,> , ° . � •, �` �30 ' oQ�_� G z ,.. 's a� 3.a Ub .� B. �] . ab s,z � ' s� aa5� I'W I � 4 IW-3.5 _�q�, ... a? r p`E� Vy`"rN x za., v� ea lv .ta8� �a.a e., o.s as sF �9.�5� �s °�z `ba�F ,q.�i o oi, es . ' - '-- ... .. O � y . � � ' pz �' . ��' �� z � e9A�9sa" zo.e 9z:"k �.�2z s4�4 a> >s� �.a 22 � d4+�w:eg..,.. e ,� �ta�Pn o � � 9 b � , ' m* ,� � ;��5 . !f+ � y� 9�0" z,p .z z3 s.9 s3 � i��gs e» °a�`3g'R� zo.o a.�� _. __ � . � � �s< � �o. �9s � �z o u.3 , . �e . . • z.� �"�\ � � r w ' � - ° rso< �se ree zi� �axe 2 zsz °��m' o_ 5s w.� w �� ,� . §a � � < . q; -.v s i i . � ` � � �. � `� ��,� �� 3� ;�+.' .,�� 1'. ea } \,�- • a5� . 73 z26 °e�y � �� , �.i oe X�B 2 a3 3. �be.9 SY '0 5 z �a .... �5... .. .. 5�n�_2a ' � w��z� ie3 <<i as E ea i f-�4,s �oo ^ _ �3 � � �r1�� . � , zo � r es' '+ � c,: : , FINAL PUD � � �� 9 � � o � - , � � � JULY 10.2014 � � „ :° �� n� ,' z� �fi.�ar�� o a / / 2� _ .¢� � b2 5 _ _4.� {�2 ��'OFF R`t . 5 . • • �� 3 �� 6 prM a z o o OFF a.a � F O R M 5 4, zb �o �5 a ��p� � �,,.z o � �i'° �om��e�oF�,n _ _ i � s, a �a a9 ��o o� ae sa sa 65 n. 66� so, n3 se4 s�9 � s< �z s, � s4 �°p �3 ��pn ��wA ��-/, ��pA ��p �ry. 6 z <a� 3�, / � ... ucfH=16 ueFH-16 �`tCl'H-N tyeJ�+-N � �^�'H 79 '�y'W�t4 ..<... �B. �iM�t4 ,�� . . . Rwrue - � 6 1p55pMFAtl� TM 3-]StWA � / � 1\ �. 3 Ai�N519 Frt BiR-]SR-90i1 . . `.� . . ,.� � � b . . _� �n,,..w.rAr�ma� wee enmarm.� � � II � ,. 5 a �, � _ / ,_ ez a�n_i. ,-. a.>� z ..5 �� .�<.3 ._.. . ,- , u s�_��w �zs�.3�sa�5�s93.3`��a o 3 a-z 'i� /... ... ._ , ... ._.. ��.. .._ ,. _. _.. .. . � _. .. M�a-n��n.an. �..E�wrK..�r.�o�rs MILLER STREET ..°'� �3 , <<�' S697s 9 ..,; �E�,,.�,aEa�,� , ' ` �� r,Es a,�,�.n p,. , �` , _ _ _ - � ♦ — __ -- -- -_ �� - � � � � ,-� r. r, ��t��o� �,. � � ��s� . _— — i , EXISiING PNOTOMEYRICS +—, i 1 � \ ., :. � .___ � ,i ._.� Q ..• ,.. G, NORTH eo. �.ai.awro. � � g��° E-100 Kiwwr�,ar:Below. "° m 3014 Call wi«.ra ds. o ao eo , . s��'s �� o �.�� .., BA D/ nn �� .ou�.pnae son�rv Nv-a-oe>o oi 1&i / eC x m no oecx[ts �0 t.�w NAa�3at nv irv s am a zart gAI�R ABBOC7ATFS.INC. w u000 aoo ��pAR�3�V�� 4�� ARCHITECTB i/ �� w�a lvrac�Me'sa/w at / mµwv �� . . � Su.rv nra 11m n. ro 4 w rvni 130 BOLITH FIPTH B1REF]P Aw/�n ha./1M 8U[TE1496 �� MLn"N&APOLIB.MN b6�0l-1900 � fq�� FAB:819.88B.6BB8 \ D � lrce�bur� 031 9B 2 0.60 6.50 T$LBP�;Ol�'E:BIf.89B.8B01 \ Lo�a5v � �� Porsche of / D Golcuo�wm by'Ghorle 4wn�,lG,f11E5 � LqM1inQ FUMwentnls LLC Minneapolis � � vo eo:soen 9t91 WryvnBoulw¢d � fkndoio nN 55I50-0e]l GoWrnVellry,61N55426 // /\ � . 651-39N-]]68 I New Facility \ ///�\ � PRELIMINARY P1D 0 MGY 2p14 I / o �� ` . rrze�mirraRrwo nnras,xoia I \ AR38 FINAL PJD JILY 10,�0N i /\�\\ � �,.. � ARI 6 �NealieM ,..� / � � � � � ,i � � �.. .�. ' � � � � '..'.. � � I / .,�, . . . .m' - � a .,.'� .... �p . .. � / ._ � �� .. �. I °.:LJ� . ._ :,,w � �� o .. ` . .. , .c c- � i��'.............�.��' � o � � ... ,. �,...»..,,,�_.�...... I `T �c3 9.i F Y... . ..��......,. ��.aM p Q 11t R � � � �i. a a a�G � .,....... :... { `��-s�ep . � ,� �-:• '��_ ; '-�- I . iio �i.2 'e ..a. .. . ...... +..�.. � ��_�" �y ° � Audi Deolership IE�TEK � �� 3a ro9,,,, s�� 4a 9393 Wayzata Boulevard � � ��`° > s� ,� �`�� ,�� 37,360 sq. ft. � �� 03 a> � P�1� � p 5n ' GQq.��ti` � FFE=901.00 � � .. � .5. WPC� �+� l.i ii3 lin � / iorM z i Z� � <w � •IYt 15 / - - 6 �' � 3 ' , tl � � a0 96 \v �� ' . •Te.�.. / D a 9 rya.. .._. ...... �-^� � _.e.......m.,a Se es 4a 4 � 9 � �O� � �. � / y j` } � � �s 5 � � -.s �� .„ D/ rrt s'sa � nt C "`^ � � �Q 1- e ez z los `✓+' � � ��1�B�� q � ��s PORSCHE OP MINNEAPOLIS � � �� ee » z< , ^m.� . o . � � �1 n.""c FFE�301.00 � 4 s'� �"N �> �; � � ��r t iz�. i3 ta3 ss e. a.> 24�240SF �, �z � _ ..,.. / /-os �, 4z a3 ,< s4 3 ��. / iis oo aa Ra o es �e es om //� 3 �aa a9 3s 33 \� � .��. � �w� �� b � „ _o..� �� z i3> h< ; � ` � �,3 ,s � a, », xR ��m� a3 ,o.� ea a� �9 � ��, a ,, ae .5 � / � 4 rzi s � O �s s ioa az e �� - � �a z� so � p nt 6 /u wa. 1.a b wi 1 �. u. rz_ • • $ � 6 qc sa zz .9 / / �� / is. ls ba' 1 �r yt� to� Sa �5 "r`�' S� � C ' Z��c' � fi�y"'�.- 2a lz 1 a3 / OM sz �.e �5 � � m 28� �e ss o0 � r /�5�z a �a ,3 3 ,5 o e. bo <� ,z t � .. 1 � lez hs is �t L 4a h� � . .§ _e Ia h�'�j' tii / / ' � y/� z aa a e. as _s 1� �� )E i� k v � � �b Io / aa, �s oz ��o . a a ns � � izz sa �. - o S e ioa aa 4.z �e e3 s_ rn � 3 H �„f�� FINAL PUD � JULY 10.2014 o . ... . - .. �.;. � �s.a ha ,�,.�1� 'ea ka w..'+ t s tso se 'zo ?z,s to .. 6.' �a � c .s .9 � � z -�5 e. 9�5 . ec e.z �o ,� ce . _ � � _ O R 0.9 �.i �o ks b �� kel a+ o. az to9 t.s b ei 3. z5 to� s.� �.� ee oe oe .Sz F M � oo �4 � �4 � ss wa �.6 �.o ss z_ oa e, ao ._ . a� a e� a� 0.4 a.: �.� aa o� �o� � �5 4. 66 - � a isa ke to. to. v s ofnin z t s io� t� l.a t� t ti. be 4> iz. 'Iia ks �. ng ' as ,k� z ' � 'S� 's 'sn k •o •s • • • • • �• � � 1055qMFXNAwrue T�: 813352�BW0 .dLL � . h� ��5 �5 < sa ina la,� .x.o aa aa 13.2 , . . , 11 laa� 15-1 . - ��..� &Ib511 Fv�. 112-P52-9M! / 3 as IN29 ,, . ,. , . .5 9a 6� MinnimWlu.MN65W1 WM� vWMm�M �1� 6 '61 p3 n5 56 �ba n� ' UE K '' � 1� � b., u< q � ��za �� s s r r u i<� v a k �, u 6 a 6< AA � �4 7 3_ 2 o ".� �s �3:� ;��. �4 � =<, ��r ta �}s ias ,a9 r s � a� 4�, � zs ,��a ° i3< i�r>3 i3� � o �a . / 68 <> 6� z9 �>3 � �, �� <4 < , � e ,o�..�,.�, ma� so 5<m sa � 5a sa �.� ta m9, �,.o b� $s xq sb sq s' , a3 4.q .1 tW1k Q I�Y!R � m � m �:O 2 i°°+«n �2 00 . �..-:�`o': ne o .i �s ��n ��3.a .. z I zs zo �� . t3 i ta t� ta iz \ � � " �� .::�o� a�. o.z oz o1 oz ox oz oi o.z cz o.. oa �� 0.3 0.3 0.3 oa o.z o.3 c.3 0� 0.3 0.3 c3 03 '03 03 0. / p:,--- � ° o c3 0� 03 03 03 _�= o� o.z _ ' __ a �_ ,_ ��Ot, T � T -� co�s �- ,. : V C � �l � �� PROP08ED .. . ... .. .... . � � PHOTOMETF21C5 ..4 � � 'WJ �JY_/ �1 L JIL l�f JYd ... .. -. __.... .. .._ .._ .._ . .. ... _. .. .._ _.. .. ' _ 0 • .:_: .�:�,. ._. __ .� ..�.. NORTH sa. i•.va e..iwme. `` � °�"" E-201 Knowwhal'�BAIOW. 39 mmw Call e.i«.r«�do. o so ao , . _-___-----"_ �e�vEwrom� i i Bl� --- > —^- r.�. �iM.� �� .��FK� �, .m. n.w mW HAHERABBOCIATEB,L�C. / i _—_- � a p.'• ��.� ' ARCffiTECTB /, ,m�..,��:. �ewn-sr�° .1, �+� '� a �� —�� , � ro�� ' �'� . ��—�� • ' e co c�so eeoen � 4TKGOBLOBA 15090I11RiF1PTfi9TREID1 o— '7 T 9UIT81646 /i /�� /• / —_— 5 ' MINNEAPOLIB.�fl�'.a5G04-]S00 �°� �,� /� --- � 6 6 c�co cr.�co eioen x xacerao:-e:azs.ase.eeoi p�� I e 6 6FKco 4TK6a BLOBn x FAX:81l.88B.6BBB �� `� I' - 6FYG0 GFYCO BLOB� X � / � � i 4 � Porsche of �, �' � � i Minneapolis ��D O � `\ 9191 W yzan Bwlevecd \ I � s e�oen pp��valley,bIN55426 / �w�b D�o�o �\ �,.r.,� a �o a�oeA New Facilily -- � I � , / V s � � - � 4'I�tCO 4�xC0 BLOeA �� I PRELMINARTWD BFIATIOI4 �� wmtrLocUsi 'r¢uLru+'rHo4 PRELIMINGRYF'J M4r33,3�14 � n ' �q-EY LOC1151 �� FMAL PIID .AILT 10,]0M �� Sl4 iR1�CPfttH03 / � �s�E cx . . \\ � �9 5 hPRE �PLHLSG �, � �\ 0.9H fkP%N13 9P � p� /i , � \\ II � �1 5 SNt�CE � { . Y : � \ �� { p �'' EMULE I � . , � \� I \� � 21 4PZIKE ' k /. ` O � \ � � 15 q5H FRA%ENJS SP X I � . . .. �«.n or.so � �)) � 1] t PSN fRA%NJS SG X \ R0 6 � . ', � ` s axwo - �� 29 B � I o E..s axKw � 30 6 . � 5 � iAH15 SG �... . Po � � 'M 11.1V390 � � � E�._�� Po�sche of Minneopolis �. � � �� 9191 Wayzota Boulevard 36 �M,r� � � i 12,994 sq. ft. � - FFE 898.00 � � �' � E�: .,..,� �•� �.�E..�� a nnr� nce�sa � � � � � o sN rRn sv x Fenwas sa. aa nsH F¢nwan sr. x � � ��. � � E s. � ��r s�� 1_ � �:�" � ��, _ ns�� , � _, � s ��.�. . - . O� � .�`>�tt" 1 4` 5 na.n 9rm Iv�RE � I il STen rrt�vLF LFR GTJWJ.A 4B �TJrNLA �� a'w �1 _ ��,�A � � � �� ,�_. ��, _. 9 �a e�oe. �� \ 50 B c0 BLoen � . �� , �r^ e �co c.eco e�oen x � c�ca c�so e�oen x � �� .��. Audi Deolership c�co 4YKC0 BLOBA x � 9393 Wayzata Baulevard � p,r� 37.360 sq. /t. � .,. � ♦ � se �co �so eLoen x s ', 3 � � �^ �� ', ca co e o x as73 " FFE=901.00 — / _ � (•e• " , zn s a�� /� t�z a s. � 4 SB 4TK60 4TKG0 BLOBA % �\ 59 . �''../ - �— GK60 � a».vua..P�c p' .. ... �..� � _' _ / T 5 41xG0 BLOBA / uuv srt � � ^ �rt.u a 1 � ��. �- �� . � � � ' _�; WAYZ9 TA B 0 L � � �, � 63 � �,s.a=�.w � , ` � �� . � ��a�ro - , � � ��,,,�...., '='� � '� � ,�,.\�� ° � <,,,a,� �"' - � � �� °�� . . `.� y s.�� _ � ; ��.�, �.�`;Qa�� / � ,� . �� . '\ 6 e cxrw / \ � ` HJIEY IOQGi GLEqi51A iRACrWIN05 � \ �� B 5� MrET IAN3T CIFOli9u i¢IACPMH03 _� � � ';� E. _ �� - p 5 �;,�w�. . , � � � � �z s �� P : / \ ��.. \ � � SPRUGE %CEA SV. % � � � � 13 4 � � r \ / ._.— � /�/ � � � ��// � f--.__�-- �6 5 /(��uui""siu�/ � � '� . . G ��/ .. • \ � � / .. . . / ..� ��e — � / . .. � . � anrm . , � � ?0 v BI / -_ _ . -_ � �\A\ -- B1 �RE 2 SP � • J s a.imn ' � 5 tt4 03 5 Fqi11 51H1 MP➢LE ALER GNN4Lq — . � �� sm�' 'C .. ...,• � � _. &1 5 nl'11 S'fC�nPPIE / Po ' " A4E¢4NrY,LF % �a��_� , „�o � FINAL PUD � J U LY 10,2014 / < �a � / s , , � . . ' � ° o� �<ss a�,a � � s, .� O R � -a� ,P � a� .m. -� 7 6 � M 6 „i,� � E �, o�� : �i �+ . j_E��-� � i� � /� � �„��,� /� ��a�.w �� .e a.o � ��' _ iomsn<mYn,n = _ — � o�� r�ocus arsu.anc�w+ x � ` ii , .✓ rrnfr�ocus arw ranciw. x . �*,1 �` . ��, `� � .E�� E� � � .��an i�- „>,,.�.a- � i � / 9.5 ��o �,K�o a.�e. . 95 5 GFKGO GlKGO BIOBA % I�wr '�?� \, 0+��.eu..✓ .� cv�co ` , "�. \�T'ss s crvkto /. � tOS�utliFXN�W� T�I: fi11�52d0i0 o z..o� 6 5 4 C y 5 5 5 me5 ix.eeo-',- �'![6n�;` `1C0 � / // . %5 8uib613 fn: 11235&A011 -4� , .�, � s�co c�so e�oen x 5 9'/s ch[co crkco eioen x Mmspoi�q1M55901 Web�. YMbrm.iwt 99 3 LttAB P➢PLE tuW9 9v % ` va�`ssu�,u°s a�Fs��T��:ii zao`�oe a. �s. �� .reee eenovw ` •�""'••w"°�•�•`�"`",'. cvocaoR c nu.mr.�reEe eerov.w ca+r�ac�u,wzm xacewr caor.� /\ ar lr�eNaaouN oec�z s�zou)vear�ozrnn er :i .rart an sKus veo.Ec,irn+ exnEvirx wns Eo a�v�u uRev n ioa*�.nr Es'orn coNsra�croH�n`wics�u �nxs <z.3ax n��oane�aerovu so.s rzees �nie�r�i+o�ffeo�ioac es a.0 ewsnNc.aEEs .r�es u%aa sHws ra ee vzorccreo nw e xareo,r�eNcucea snu�ee rrew � aesauma,. zooi unvzareo m.nu�Es ioi raEes �/ .�vscez ra sNeer�-wi z�ocnraN �rc�rzon aooi enaawc�v�u�wns rar anrrtco ca g ra�wcue oH s�re. r o ee ru�ocn zees �*n�Bi Foa lvte svnouc) a , �s wns nooso urea zooi nrvaa.eo oi.at - u+o oe `� ��r��µ��E��sA��A•��A�N�a.o�r� .mw.o�g�o�o 9z.�9� Q��O�Q� �.�.�.�W��a,�F. ��.��a��.�..� cONs.�O �T COOE SECn�N a3?iY4TazE5ERVAnort� � UCM�N A�11N�A%��1 RE�tED.G2 LNiL A fhb£51 IS HPOE i0 MD ��s � �1REE P�SER/AtION "r��Ks�.s rne�aeEts�m s'e£e�w��ws�iar was PLAN / i�i s`w..`�sF�o:,�°�o�.��c�.�c`�"'Ennc�°:`�'�a«"�`w�„_,o° a r�aerov Toesrameo,r�e oa oea,.��rv011r�` .... ..... � ...., 4� . ., NORTH � ei..nw.,a. �'""��W��'�.°.o"��: ,,�«,�,o�� -a>-�, L-101 Knoww�ar.Below. `��" 39 mzoia ��ER�.,�o��aEE��,aEo�. .�ER„�.REE Cdll wior.rou dp. o ao eo � � ,,��,. I i. ca,rncr urircr seance vaowees Foz rcw ianroN a seavu�s n�a:es veae�o eccrauic. D� I 3. coozoewre wsra.unw WnH coN.wc�oas vEacaznNc acLn.Eo waeK. J.� o rrE nrewewu essocu'rx.N oc rarzseerre+i sruvnrms nw Be ar rnam s'rocX rzee �1K&R AfiBOCIATFS,INC. Isc�xe nw't�useee wwu tN 1�oe�n�wmc.�t��nw+c sw�.�caveeri. ��e rueez aF awars cN r� ARCHIT&CT9 � 4 nooEo vee a.ac rneo. r a o vuers rwsrn.'ro i oner venr wrnn,wirN 3 vouos oF contzau rccriaea I 5 SHO¢TFN1. 50� ��'0.TO A INRM OEGiH OF 1 NbE4,IHGORi POOIiION.LL i0P30.0.4 r�EE0E0 TO hPXE i.V ANT 150 BODTH FIPTH 9Tf2ffi1 PLL iU¢f n¢f15 pSiiKBED BT PT15T¢UCiION. BUSTE 1445 — —�--—�-- I n0 n MInW OF 6 NCYES OF i0F501 MD S00 ui iURf AREAS PSiU20FD BT CONSiRUCMM. MINN&APOIIB.l�'S4GOE-1800 6. 9v� 'PBT.EPHOIV'E:018.8W.8801 _ FAS:819.99B.600B — VARD ———— � a �P"�.=��°��ra�';�.�:�Pe��.a�� _ _ - -— B o UL�' ———————————————— ——_—-� ��.Ww��a�A.��«�K o�o aR.�aw��,.�,Ex��.�«E ao�A�EM.o Porsche of �., -- WAYAZATA --------------------- --------------------- —�l �o�E.��,��R��w��`,"��,o��s m��`�„'�s�� Minneapolis —1 �� 919IWeyutaBouleved __._——.————— —__--————— — — � vezc+++u v�e�mxc ern. Goldrn Vd1eY.bIN 55426 �.: ——————————— 3 9 4 _ _ _ - - ---- I n.,7 R��A`�;,�n Pa�,o�W�':.��,,�u.�,.��.aQ�A,�,��,.QA�.�.o�s� New Facility ------------- INTERSTATE HIGHWAY N0. --- �-24 � °""W"` °` OF WA Y PLA T �JO. 2� � ""°_, 7 R/GHT PRELMINARYWD BMGT7014 F /R/��'SP O�� I�N I PRELIMIN4RY H1D MAr 13,3016 _ O . � .. . • � FMAL PlD JIILT 10,}q6 — � MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT TRACT c � � _ P��°`°�"""'�`:�:�`°� � �� `�`�' I N T E R S T A T E HICHWAY N0. 394 ._ c�,+*c<x�oc*�.,*EQua a*re ou�+c w*��+oso�vEo w zc�s.E.oH — I —_ �WscvvE eeEnC sr��nu xtuR nareowurelr evEer rwENn4ae(4a1 SVPCEs.nr ______________ ---_� ______ _—_—.———__�————-—_�—— ¢Em1�D NiE¢4�¢LM�CAVE �8.�,SF � _ - - �-------- ------_--_-------_----__--- � � �---- PQ�oEo�a��os�� o.,�� '"� —�___�———� ':I I 0 TRE�ES REU.RE�F02 REGLACEtEM¢H£2 TO S�EEi L-101 // �- '�� aoiw eun I �/ I_ _— — ��.. __— —"'1 J—.. T I I 9o5rEW 4H211�B9 C¢ONOEOftEPLACH£Ni /' I I � ' �/ — — � � �� I '� / -'_ __ �� i I � ' �� ____ _- - �"� �� li�. � � oE�.�aQE�.o�s�� i i ,� � �� , � I � �� , �� ' ; I �'� / � T `\ li j¢ I ' � � / �� \ i� � � � � ;�� V �� \ � I I � � � �, � �--—— � � , - ` •� ,9�', � I �� ' � ' I I� � � �� ' I I� >'�� , � �, � mi � ' J ' I L I � Parscha o(M�nneapolrs --- � I� �� 9191 Wayzota 6oulewrd ' I I I ikT� 12,994 sq R ry�l I ¢EFE4 Ta fNURCEo VE�w y_ , . I I FFE=898.00 i I i � � _�_ '�. �� L. � � 'I�I� �� i� �/.... �� `` . � � I , � I , I I � � I I I � �� LOT � ... I I I � � ` _ I � i � � � � I � � � I a�e�oeoi�ntp ° � � i � ' I 19393 Wa360 sq o`tlevord � i / e aw I . i i I �3 I / � i I vP�°' � �e_9m.00 � _�— � I � ;%� aE � � I '� —— � � � � � � � - e � ;y�� T / - � � � � i � � � �� WAYZATA BO(YLEVARD ... � �� .. � � / ;a , K / / I i /I / ' �a�..�a. � �a � � -----� i , ' � � � � � bx�� 'a � � y � / � 1 t ,-, � ' � / / ` �,� � � � �_ ,�` � i i � ` i, � I� � �— ��i � I / � �� / , �� i I �INAL PUD / � I� � I � �� i � JULY10.2014 � i A � � �� f �� . � �''��" I -i i � . . � �� - ,� /� t`� � i i � . . � I I /� I_ � � F O R M � � ' � `�� / 1 � � / � 3 � � � . \ I I I fomSnemFn� _ � /�� / / � I I � O�� O� � I I tO55ouMFANAwnup TM: 612�25R.B010 �" � K f T I I I $yp5f9 Fd 612-�.BOi/ / : � � . . . , � , . . ,.�ix � � I MnneyoLY�MN55101 Wtl vkMn.rel / / / / � � . 'd l� . / ' rv fi I I / � Ai "_ __ // �/ `� ��a �� -- — q X /i �.I� �� x_ 4_>. I - - ' ._ / , � � , / M �� WA YZA TA �� `�,� � �� .o�..�.,.�,. ; � � �,.��,. � -----' �__� p � �-- <-'� � � ,.s�. a,� -------------- ---------------------- ----------- --�------------------------------ ----�----7-- - - --------------- --------------� --�------------------ -----L ��o��o� \ � � � w�� 5� � � i �-------—��i � � i i i 1 �/ /� I I�r_ ^y O L———___ I � OVERQLL LANDSCAPE \ 1\ � // I L___—— I"�I�� —� , PLAN / / � ———� � � V � \ :.... .:• NORTH �, .m•m..n.�e. � / ,� � � � �� s L-200 �, ��--L � I I Cvn�l�e.«�rWmo• o ao eo m��4 , , � � ��.a�.�.�R.��s F�F��o�a.��=Fe��,z��=oQ�ra aF�.� BA z. ��.,��.��.n�w.��o�.QAR�s PEQF�,��QE�..�W�K � � � � � '�� a. aurir nn.eew.s�uu.cai.�oen ro r�ucwcu+nssonnraN oF ra.rsscevrcN sra.vneos uo ee or w,aor sracK.� B.1HER A880CL1TFP,INC. Xw GUM1 N!Y WMAdIWV!�; � MIlMI�FXM! � IMMBS �IIANIINOY3 POOLCOIm.�:: � SCHEOuiE nN� 04a . . . . :OENOlE9 A¢EA TO BE 9000E0 SE.�fSi�EPO�Y OXIMLE.oH o WawNL i�E�WN�G�SNNJ.COviu'f[t�THE N?EER OF Fl.MrtS ON irE ARCAITECT9 cONFCR0U5 SNtIRS )o .NBL 1Nb ERUS NOa6QJiPlA3 YLLE CNY IYa.4w B5 cONT. OMu�ER �4 � s t cPW'�G�F,0 vMn rOP50l Ta vPRT PEAT Mx1U5 WIM 3 FO.MDS oF cRT�t¢nAl FHLTL¢E2 at*a) vean�ccfs sN x zow Ews.uc vnoe . .. � nooeo�eai�cµrneo. 06 AROIM'fICA'LFO LW' �YN v 5'W Y4 COM. OMA'E � 6 SP2EA�A`gIN5nLe1 LpF 6��TO A INH11 OEPTH OF 4 NLlES.MORi appRqrNL TOP50.AS NEE�E�TO 11AYE W nriY 160 BOCTH FIFTH 9TR&�1 w.EenS a�az i-aSnnAiA CSBkBOR � iWF n2Ens oL4neeED BY LasTeucnai atJITE1495 anLt ...,��_ � �'�ES Gf i0P^AL AW 50�NL i�Fi IAEas�6iUtBEO Br cONSiRUCiroN. T�6LENP�HO'B:91E.8BB.89011� nC(m/ � FA]L•81Y.888.SB08 R�nGER B� aOH x 30W 3'Cnl �- � "/� 5EE LETnlS F02 p[9iN OF ftDNi116 SOL . OECOLq15 ikEfS e BEvq BEMA GP➢TRFE2A BkB r.rzwssEs ioi cneF Fen*N[a vt[9 censs ca.nnntuos�ncutcaw'tnu Fce¢srrx' s'N.rv qi to�r. covru�a � � , ,_ a. o��,.s��.�.o�..�wR��Ee�w�.� Porsche of ��s��wRr o�r�,,��,.��a,�c�.�K o��a.�wEo�,w�F��.�aE��EN..o c �W� �� Minneapolis �`.,..� . ro�a+e n w�l /r)rna e�vcrz eoce na.a+o.�a vEeo eneaee rneee lra n oevr«oF r�a�c37 vr,ues) glgl WeY��%Hodevmd ., �iNs swzeooeo wvmwoao enek rucw osw azww recfs Hm v�acto wxur+n sweue ce Crolhn Vallry,MN 35426 ' PEaH„w P,�..�� u�E,�E.s pm�a.�,��,.Qa�.�ro�,R s�o New Facflity � . �S�rtE L�SiGE�LauDSPLAPE4B0.A�E2 ASE 4N1GE TLTO 6 NCN MD 3 i0 6 WDE. FRELIMINGRY WD 8 MAY 1016 � , - � PRELIMINARY FUD Hdr 33,10:6 I .. ��..��. .. crcv aF Ga�EN vFl.lEr YN nir coDE. FlNAL flID A1Li 10.]0M `�. ` � � o , � . � �,�.,.��,� , � ��E��xs��o�^�E�o��;F��o�T��EP wR��...��.Q�s EA�� I � �� b�_ ��z.,so��s. �(t0)�5"LOc�ST- �� pL pARKNG LOi APEA 31 9F l �qMfD NiHtb2 I � O iRK3 REIX➢R�EO FRL¢F4LEAC21fNi REf4R i0 91Efi L 101 �(1�5'LOCVSr 'i `\` _ i�i 9�� u05 PROVDfO�ALfI'IENT � vOSNfW SHR � � I T J� .. 5 �T�EYPGRAR Y1M�.NG A2TEn6�cE55RN.00ceE5vEA0ED iREETS�WSCAGE CR1fRITE BEST�SiAG�NG eOGF55 t0 HPMAN� � � '� �' • I 2ALiP2`uLL BE ftESVUGPAE FOi2 WAiERVG O� B:. T �,p.�nw�¢nL2uc TO nnNinfi E%Si�u'HEUTH wn vv�euiT OF iQEES u�R w�u wCATa,a�s�TE�s�i j c� !-1 � � Ft G�Ri ts K. F1NL SEiiNt oF aELocAtEo TaEEs Swu eE oEiEaMEo WIiN iNE FalaWiNG vnR/J�E'rE2s N rw � 3¢ALL ; � nPMUN OeC�vu ORY�NiA DNOaA�LONqTILNS�oF m E Sr+Du1 BEt19TAiNE9 AS L�OS[iv ns vosSe�E TOi2EE � Audi Dealership e �a,�aa„a,�E,s.�xa�,�a„o aQ�„�� 9393 Wayzata Boulevo�d ' �,�� \ � 37,360 sq. ft. � aE��a.E rQEE�as��,�o�a�.o��,�,��a.��,o nA�.A��c��o�r�s RK�.,Eo�,�E��,ra��a�o,�o�„�o�,�.E I 6�� <� � 1e a�sE��F�a E�.�M��A��,E��Eo.�s��ewE�Ew,��E p��oe.�re��FaREeE ��ti?� � FFE=907.00 q a��E��"�a,.oa,>�F o�a��ro�oo R oe ��RA�.�� !- ��,��..�.�a��F��,��.,� ' �T �v , 2 �ECn��EOAOECRYIUS/CONFE2W3 T4EE3 nzE i0 BE iRIroEO OF ALL OEPD WOOD AN�G�WED i0 Nni�Ru u10 IMFOfUt I .. i MFEARAN9RPNiE9 DECpNHS iREES CCAiEO N RAtS1aVw/vEMCiA.Aa C¢CLLAiION A2E0.4 AFF i0 BE iaufrtD 6'-0'FaOH C20WD i0 1`E LOWESi gzqNCµREL M / \ � / .e� aQ� LAL� SPADE Dlr�s'MEtER SPADE�DEµPvtH� 3 axu � ' W 4 N tq 0'1'IN1111 L1A Q 5.`LpHt 96�(4 ) / (BE)6'sucaR un.t � �I':l I B• / caa�n�.a� ' � { . . U T C Sr lavrHu.svn�) i (as)e�su c-., , \ � `� �� ooua..e smauo a cn.w� �� / .� �. .' '.t 3 @ RO OEGREf WiE¢VAl9(iYo) / \ :' y' � PORSCHE OF MINNEAPOLIS " •,a ��,a E, ,�,f J�,l � FFE=901.00 \ cao M"Rir w�srQ�'nv� � ,/ �' � �� 24240 SF �°r � E,�.�E.o NA�.�F�3�e o•s,��s.a�s , � � � \ �ea�F�,�,_ \ � Eo��a��:�w,�.��E , � � �� _ � � C � �� :� � °'n e: a�.wr�+c�sa�"'coNrncr W TM rzu� owi,wu� cnna,s �� .. 3 znc� � � / �, ... _ �� :�`a;c�x z��w000 srnee s�, ��" cM i �� ' a:;� � �Exrs,Nc si.ecano� // � � � e�a_ �ou. _ /' ,, i �' � ��..�W..��oQa�s / 3 i �I�� , i �,u�4E�ANE�.��e�r s,s.�,. ' ;aN .� . � naN.nu 3 e9e>�a, �u.EAe�.�a�,.��N"e FINAL PUD � � �� i � ° � � � ""� � � t �aE�4.o�.�tis. °` J U LY 10.2014 , ' �*vw c � _,. , s�r� � o ��'"� ,� �` � � SPADE-RELOCATION� �� s�K \�� FOR CONIFEROUSIDECIDUOUS TREE N0� 3 I � 0 \ � O crn.� m:. � r msn � O R M � etoFNSM1 �� 3 Jec B, $,� �� . W �`l �,� 3 2A0. (TTF.) \ �p5gpytliFillM1Ar�nw T�I: L13-RSR�B010 5 LPYF 3 JbC q t � /. mv � � ��,.��,owH o�R�, �bs, ... � {B�3 3 Evn � Mnnspo4M1�101 Wtl Ypbm.iwl 5 wxP�f � 3 kul I �� S LAeF � �� ....._. .__ a cACF Q `. �4f G"6Nk80 C94Wc 16CAKF . QO'OO�,��/�O ' � ' ._ .� I �(58)5 GrvK60 �� F�a5VE0LRn0E w � pPL 'RA�t � �` _ �. HA9�E0 L2AOE REFER i0 LF�IDSLP4E FLnN Gce ra¢a�c-n�imrwu aevermz. i 16 GeqkDcoVER aliSCE SiLB BED ga �G+� � ^ � ll'� �nc�iz) � :�+QO . . : . .� / ��55}6"CANkc� ewsiNc wecznoE Y�.. �� . . . . . ' u '� . .,,,� ,,, ✓.._..« .... .,,......,��..,......,_„e,.,,...: �� 5'IAE -b; PRq�RIPT B�i�50P5 OF NA.E Tp P0.0JECf . ,,,,,,,,,,,, , ,,,,,,,,,,,„w....,«....��.� ...,..6. . . . . . 0 ,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,:.,,.,,,,«.«.,...w._..,.,..,._.......: • i .«....,,.,,,��.. • WIFIMY]&Z1I . b/VPOR� . ��...„ l m7 .-"C521 5"6W� W�. EB -iaa) M. =��o)6 sPRVCE . (5_)e GNkCO' � �'- � 200IgBALL�qL GA�GN A9�NWT AS q ` (T1PJ . roi1N0ED S�BC¢PDE PoS%LE WIiNOUt DE5i20YNG SOL hPSR �{�V`�10�0� V�O C { � SHRUB PLANTING _ w�N$�`�� 1 T 9 � �� wo scue v.• �� ..,. , ENLAR'.aED LANDSCAPE ' PLAN .:,.�..... � • NORTH w„ sm,m..w.,e. �t .., G � cn, mz-z.i �p�� L-201 Knowrvmari6@lOw. �� mw�o Call wior.yau ag. 0 2o aa . . J , i - I ., I � � � I �, � I3A ll3Sil,i:_15H(�('I.�1'H:S,iNl`. d12f`H['Pl:f^I'� �G1 C� CJ E9 JE K - - - - - ' �OI'TL Pll"fll�'1'NLk'C - \1�01.1�,n�� iq I I l'k:l.l`1 I10�'}.:��1`.:ct�YUA��'g I r. �.I:1R.:1.1i.:nuW 1\\. Porsche of � �� m�-> � �� Mmneapolis 9191 N'a��iau&�utc�arJ o� � /Ilr �mi�_y. ' � Ilo I b G 1dG�Vn11cy,MN 554.6 � I I I A � i o i i � New Construction . �m��• �m��• � -- �- �?� Frelnaary F+n ee ney smµ ��" PRJA RwVl�u 09 Juiw]0{1 n��pse �� m�• � E9�� ' � luustl fa RIGng II,Ma 10Lt . I�i� � __ ��i.e � 4� pnuel PID IO July 4mLt — ny m == 9 P 9 f9 G e — � - ' oi , -,- - -- � � �-��• o �-��rz �3 _ _ — r-1 r-1 �-1 ol I I �-- I I ,—� I I lo I I I �� I I I I I I I I � \� Im.rl / / \� I I I I I I � � I�I ��'�' 1 I I I I I I I � � I I � � I I I I I I � � I I � � I I I �� I I I � � I I � � I I I �� I I I �--' I I �-- I I I . L_.J L_J L_J 1 I � o I I,I rRµ�, __ I _�_ __ �darJwdni��ia �� o oy � �s 4 ,��„ � � -s;� �1:';�'�; �� e-e M 6-e M j -- ___ ____ —_-- __ � C�i O — � O Ilpll � _ _ _ lo '/ 34� — �+.�.� — — ---_— r�l bletubi'i � I �e`._...�iii�� C] � D1 ivo-g �)li'-4'JI y _ -___sw��gauJ e�ru - �,T�L�,� '.�` r�5 � I I t , � , � m� _�______ � � � J��'' P _ f-' _' � + - - - ' - - - - _ � . 'Q' 'E'' u i i� _ - -----� O u i i c iz� a C L . � I p O -� � �n � . 's e � I I � � i� �u � ��v =��I'j �'--- -�i i � i � � ii Ib - �Q- 0 �' 'i��iiiii I _ e � I �S� n� ��, p � � — _ _ L�i `^9 w dl� _ I m K1 IP. I m � ry m I � Im i � I - -_ ____ .'e . __ _ _ - _ _� � -_ _ - -- - _ --__ - - 6 5 ____ ___- —- 9 I �i��DNrMs fybn o�hms o 0 o c �iPv iea+i�9e ts idmi Maga I I �I I I II I I ml9 - � I �I I Q4 " �I I I I C I� I £ - e � I I I a ,.I m � � � � e - j I O m I I 0 II LIJ � ' ry � s �a � � � � � �u,� O "� ✓�� - - �� _ e I � anr9� . � �a�� L / ��_ :,u ' _ , ,• �� - _ _ � � �� I _ � _ �� _ _ _ _� � __ _ � - l,' I I�,,O,�` --�___ ___________ � �` � — — ^ % 9 C 0` ` __ I �'___. ' __J / � _ —'— __— p_p. 4�_ . �'iD' Q'"m I I I I I� I �yI I L Lc V L` �� K — NCRTH ��Firo!Floor Pla� �� J 3/32'=P-O' a ,� � V� mvimamia First Floor Plan � ";;°A-101 d z��., —1 , I _ I :, I 4 I 5 I � � . . � , i - i � i � i � i f3 � I3A 113IiF,1:.155()t`tA'l'hS.[Nt'. dKl`H[TI:1:"1`v G1 D.I, E9 Jb K - i.w sui-i�u rncrn.rwavr rtna_c.nm r�:,arz-e�.� I I I �a:ni.wr�� I 1 r��:�a>':rrv..vxw '� ——�— � " Porsche of � Minneapolis a1H1 V.'�av�auFk�ulc.uN I cps-,u cp.�� g G��ldciiVxllcy,MN55�2F � p�e��n r '""" � New Construction *w>� � ��„�. - - J �imm.y� OB May R0M P�.TlA Fdsv�su O9,Fro 10N v�Vf!ry �" luwtl for Rlckg II J�ne 1tlM .i louvan I� PMbI PID 10 JuIY 10F{ Rovias BLNt � �toa�n.p�bwn mellei�e �i �mnr a1 � *op o rcp o �e m Il � I1 0 3 — . m6 —— � �� _� ^ �I'�' `� L il � � i O` __ ___ L � �� I � o --�j�' "-�� a 'i � �o� I c� —�e '..�,F --+� *sv �� . q _ _ _p w - J� � �O � nv��g ne t 0 �^i�^� �� n I r___, elq..pv. \ �O 4'n __ 6-_--- L� � I I I nJ . _ _ _ .5� _ m ' I I �w I I � � 0 II � I I � � �I � I "� �p��`� � �❑� s i — � o � e�^C� � o � — i � Ni �i�ii I I �O� � i �� 5 _ _ __ I I I r_______ �___________� ___________ I I r____� � I I I I I I I I I � I I I I�I I , , II I I � � @ II I I I I I I I I I - I I I I II �,e I � i i I I I I b+ I - I I �`� I I I I I I I I I I Ri I I i II I I �, n� It I� � I I I I � I H �^ _ I �� I II L___J I� � J _ _ _ _ � \`\� `` �__- ( --_____I ___=__ i/i � - -� � \�� __---- I� i _ ��`��_ _ � -�- _____.� �i� -�_ _ _�_ I l I I � I � — h� � u.�o. 1 1 �.�+-,� — �' � 04 �� LJ K Norru �s�F�oa P�e� m �.f 3/32'=I'-0' �� a n mvimamis 5econd Floor Plan 0 �.° �"',�;'A-102 tzo�4 —1 , I _ I , I 4 I , � f , , . � , I - I � i } � > � � � I3A i�ar.r�z assoc�ixres.t�c. .1Hf•IIITI�:f•Tti - 1�'CII�'1'It12L:'I` �1_�:l'L•�..i�aW i.WJn It, be�i�E:�Ie�•u'% 1�:\\� t " Porsche of o,� ,� Minneapolis . 9191 Wavieia RuulcwrJ �'"s �I' W� ts�dcn Vai1cY.M\<5Y.6 `:... °�r20'•�• ��'�' � g �4Gxe' New Construction ei oe-.• - .�a»e�� Relinaey P1ID 0B Mey YOLt O O O PCTL1 I�v�m 09.Aro 20t1 .o w rs 4�wd lor PYkNg II Jvs]0M Pinbl F.� I0 July 4DV{ �i�e t) 1) p�p-� aww e�y«i pxc.or�quip � I I• yq MJ-I R�u> 1y kl� �� I ______________ __________________________________ ______________ __________________________________ � I .• � I / �r I l` r� ° I � � � .�4�im�'� 0 etyligln I � � � I li ]j L— —J `—� NORiN ��ofP�an �1 ��3/32'.I'-0' � � m1-bnmia Roof Plan �A-103 —1 , I _ I :, I � I ; I �, I— �n �g� f� .: ' � � �'�R3 �}a a� � O ' `sg ^ � N s _ ;3 r � S-° a ° ` Q _ ie u '�$ i � .� _^� �o�N � ��,J � °o �f . .� � . . w - i � �F <- ��'a� � �� $ � � w e$ f1 r� .i...J Q��o i: Z �� Y _�s�� 0 U N EI � = i - i - i � i �__ �� $m�� B� ��g�$plg � g �� IS �� 'a '� �^ 'P e� $g � °� g�' �3��°'3 $.a F. �°:�� 3��= �s y.p�y i$ ��s i ia i « i$ i& �- i � �. ig ya =af � �a8 gs�a ia� � ��"� �e ��Y9'8� = ca" ( �` �° � i � ��a ��5� � �� E�89 \ � I ��8� �§ �$�' I �$ a�a �Z - � � �m II� I �&W �5g� 8a $� s� i� Ce. Ea' ' o II i — � -- �� , �, �� i�-1 8a_ - �-6 ¢s� � _ �ya 3e� n _— ags 4 t° $. � �a �aB ° g� m s$ f - � �� ,_ � -- ,. �g��EPi ?�$�� 8�� -- o aS �� e a �a ��'�� g��, $�d o m� ��e� �6$�m $$b-`� � d � � a � �� o� �� ---- -- — �� 3� --� Q ��, — W 0 W � � d �s I I ° ' " � , � a U � � � ma � -- � a �� W� W= , s = � � =' — a � � m y 11 Z m y � #$ 'L �8 � � �� Sm � I s� g I ^ ` i� � �a � i; BE � � i � �a � w` #� �� $$a�� '� �s — � � � �� — �- i e 'g 3 n 'a { o _4 � � 04� `6 +� g y� o « = 5 � W �, � `��,� d 9 i �a� � 0 �s � �� s � ��' �� °� � � � � � .. �` n e m _ _ m m .. �� s=� � E �� a° .� J :a :� 5 a� � 9 c � o Q 0 (p��s°��an� � '„� I: �P' $og�I �$; I s= I..g �^ I �y� I � �3�'-�.g��8�pp� ��$ � �� e .b=�°'�f �mn I� �� "is � $� ` �a�� i�e�� i$ �& �9 0,��'�'� �g �� ,�;g€�s� � �&� m�5m ° �� aaE� ��<�s �. � 2�� g-s5 �� s�.s�_� � �` �� --� _ � _ I _ � .. � � ORDINANCE NO. 529, 2ND SERIES AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE Approval Amendment to Final Plan of Development Carousel Automobiles (Porsche Dealership) P.U.D. No. 95, Amendment 3 Twin Cities Automotive DBA Golden Valley TCA P., LLC, Applicant The City Council for the City of Golden Valley hereby ordains as foltows: Section 1. City Code Chapter 11 entitled "Land Use Regulations (Zoning)" is amended in Section 11.10, Subd. 2, and Section 11.55, by approving the Final Plan of Devetopment for Planned Unit Development (P.U.D.) 95, Amendment 3, thereby allowing the applicant to expand the existing Porsche dealership building and modify the parking lot. This PUD is subject to all of the terms of the permit to be issued including, but not limited to the following specific conditions: 1. The plans prepared by Baker Associates and submitted with the application on July 10, 2014, shall become a part of this approval. 2. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Fire Department to Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager, dated August 18, 2014, shall become a part of this approval. 3. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Engineering Division to Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager, dated August 18, 2014, shall become a part of this approval. 4. Parking in the lot south of Wayzata Boulevard shall be limited to inventory vehicles. Employee parking in this area will not be permitted. 5. All signage must meet the requirements of the City's Sign Code (Section 4.20). 6. This approval is subject to all other state, federal, and local ordinances, regulations, or laws with authority over this development. In addition the Council makes the following findings pursuant to City Code Section 11.55, Subd. 6(Q): 1. The PUD plan is tailored to the specific characteristics of the site and achieves a higher quality of site planning and design than generally expected under conventional provisions of the ordinance. 2. The PUD plan preserves and protects substantial desirable portions of the site's characteristics, open space and sensitive environmental features including steep slopes, trees, scenic views, creeks, wetlands and open waters. 3. The PUD plan includes efficient and effective use (which includes preservation) of the land. 4. The PUD plan results in development compatible with adjacent uses and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and redevelopment plans and goals. 5. The PUD plan is consistent with preserving and improving the general health, safety and general welfare of the people of the City. 6. The PUD plan meets the PUD Intent and Purpose provision and all other PUD ordinance provisions. Section 2. The tract of land affected by this ordinance is legally described as follows: Lot 1, Block 1, Lot 1, Block 2, and Outlot A, all in Carousel Automobiles P.U.D. No. 95 Section 3. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Sec. 11.99 entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 4. This ordinance shall take effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law. Adopted by the City Council this 16th day of September, 2014. /s/Sh�ard M. Harris Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: /s/ Kristine A. Luedke Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk Gl�� C)� Pl ' �� annin��crartm�nt 763-593-8095/763-593-8109(fax) <�� .—.a��*° .�,�� ..�m��i�+��°'�� n"�'. ,, ��d��d�� . e� (�a�amua� _...»�ir q��a�'��r� .� .,�w,�� ;, _.;�h��ipn�i.�� .._rrr��'J�ii�_. ,��lii�i�'« � Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting September 16, 2014 60 days deadline: September 23, 2014 Agenda Item 4. C. Public Hearing- Preliminary PUD Plan for Golden Villas PUD No. 118- 9130 and 9220 Olson Memorial Highway- Golden Villas, LLC,Applicant Prepared By Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager Summary Golden Villas, LLC, represented by William Stoddard, is seeking approval of a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Permit to develop a seven level (six stories above ground and one level below) 162 unit market rate apartment building at 9130 and 9220 Olson Memorial Highway. The site currently houses a vacant bowling alley and a small office building. This is the location of the recent Tiburon Apartments development which was approved in 2012 but not constructed. The property is zoned R-4 High Density Residential and guided for long-term High Density Residential use on the General Land Use Plan map. The total area of the two lots is 2.57 acres; if approved, the two subject parcels would be replatted into one lot. The project is located within the area designated as the Highway 55 West Development Area by the City's Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA). The Applicant has submitted an application to receive Tax Increment Financing (TIF) assistance in order to make the project financially feasible. The proposed PUD wou�d allow the construction of a market rate apartment building centrally located on the site. A majority of the parking would be in an underground level as well as a portion of the ground level. Surface parking spaces would be located on three sides of the building. The remaining half of the first floor would contain the lobby and 8 one-bedroom units with individuaf entrances that would face Golden Valley Road. Levels two through six would contain a mixture of 14 studios, 106 one-bedroom units, and 42 two-bedroom units. Additional amenities include an outdoor pool, a spa, secure indoor bicycle parking for residents, and a sixth floor outdoor terrace. The Applicant is also proposing to utilize some solar power and water conservation technologies. The total square footage of the building is estimated to be 246,272 square feet. Building materials are projected to be a mixture of brick, metal panels, and fiber cement siding. Unit sizes would range from 645 square feet to 1,188 square feet. 166 of the 223 parking spaces would be enclosed while 57 would be surface spaces. Preliminary plans indicate two spaces for car share vehicles, outdoor bicycle parking to compliment the indoor secure bicycle storage, and 20 spaces for scooter/moped parking. The pool and terrace would be located on level two and at the rear of the building nearest Olson Memorial Highway. A sidewalk is proposed to be added to the north side of the site along Golden Valley Road. Landscaping is concentrated mainly around the perimeter of the site. While a significant amount of old pavement would be removed as part of the proposal, the massing of the new building, the surface parking spaces, and a 20 foot fire access lane around the rear of the property would increase the impervious surface amount to 80%. A neighborhood meeting was held on September 10 to share this proposal with neighbors. At the August 25, 2014, Planning Commission meeting, the Commission voted 4-0 to recommend approval of the Preliminary PUD Plan. City Code establishes standards for PUDs, which are laid out in the Staff report to the Planning Commission. In addition, City Code establishes findings that must be made by the City when creating a PUD. These findings are included in the City Council's recommended action. Attachments • Location Map (1 page) • Planning Commission Minutes dated August 25, 2014 (4 pages) • Memo to the Planning Commission dated August 25, 2014 (5 pages) • Memo from the Public Works Division dated August 18, 2014 (6 pages) • Memo from the Fire Department dated August 18, 2014 (2 pages) • Applicant's Narrative (2 pages) • Site Plans submitted July 25 and August 11, 2014 (14 pages) Recommended Action Motion to approve the Preliminary PUD Plan for Golden Villas PUD No. 118 subject to the following conditions: 1. The plans prepared by Gronberg &Associates, Inc., submitted with the application on Jufy 25 and August 11, 2014, shall become a part of this approval. 2. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Engineering Division to Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager, dated August 18, 2014, shall become a part of this approval. 3. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Fire Department to Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager, dated August 18, 2014, shal) become a part of this approval. 4. The final design shall be reviewed by the City prior to Final Plan approval. 5. A�I signage must meet the requirements of the City's Sign Code (Section 4.20). 6. A park dedication fee of$31,680 (2% of the estimated land value) shall be paid prior to approval of the Final Plat. 7. The Final Plat shall include "P.U.D. No. 118" in its title. 8. This approval is subject to all other state, federal, and local ordinances, regulations, or laws with authority over this development. In addition the Council makes the following findings pursuant to City Code Section 11.55, Subd. 5(E): 1. The PUD plan is tailored to the specific characteristics of the site and achieves a higher quality of site planning and design than generally expected under conventional provisions of the ordinance. 2. The PUD plan preserves and protects substantial desirable portions of the site's characteristics, open space and sensitive environmental features including steep slopes, trees, scenic views, creeks, wetlands and open waters. 3. The PUD plan includes efficient and effective use (which includes preservation) of the land. 4. The PUD plan resutts in development compatible with adjacent uses and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and redevelopment plans and goals. 5. The PUD plan is consistent with preserving and improving the general health, safety and general welfare of the people of the City. 6. The PUD plan meets the PUD Intent and Purpose provision and all other PUD ordinance provisions. .._. . � � ,- . .r . t �t � � LYMOUTH'�� ' • ;� • , ..... �� •� • ��f� � � L � ��. . �� ♦• I�� ♦ .� � . a: � �: �Q I . . . . . » . . •��M �l,i _..._ i � _� � I y � � i°' Subject Properties: � } ! 9130 and 9220 Olson Memorial Hwy 6 - ' � . � . � . . � � � �,�_` + GoI Pn v�i . . ' ! ` � s • • .., �� ....--. i � .,... '.. . _ � , r "�- � , _.... .., i � • �� ca��te 1{-ai}C'� � _... ! _.-„. _�r-�� N� ' , i .:.--^"'..". � 513�e t��Y '� � �,.,.,...� �� ._..... � �1�"�''`Y . . .,..�+^� o�` � :' �'_.'`{ ; "�~ _......�-'...�. � �n 4h Q � ,=� . � y,pr- Z � ' F� ,.n � . .__.._.�.....�. � a, - ��, . . t � ,. � a� � . z ....;...._.... ..�. . c '.- � . � � } � � 9 � ....�n. + _. T : . . � � � � __ �� w�i� ��,r � � ` � � �*+ � �' ��..�, �+e . � i _ �; ��' •� ��t;��u�cE nve � f �� :�_. ---�_ � � � �� 'n �� , *$� ,/ � - , ; �. � �� i,�j)1(r '�y� �Ui ..�� .I�jTJ :' � ..�tllk. y{!/��, ykr.. ,,� y�� , i, ...�.. . .. . . ,.. . ,.�;-:-�F _..aUtt � �'�... �llu�1:?�14v 'i ��F s_• Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission August 25, 2014 rp� Page 7 . The PUD plan preserves and pr tects substantial desirable portions of-the site's characteristics, open space and ensitive environmental features including steep s es, trees, scenic views, cree , wetlands, and open waters:' 3. The �, D plan includes efficient d effective use (which includes preservation) of the lan :�. 4. The PUD � results in develop ent compatible w�th�adjacent uses and is consistent with�` ; Comprehensi�, Plan and redevelopment plans and goals. 5. The PUD plan is c�n�istent with p,eserving arid improving the general health, safety and general welfare of`the people.of the Cify. 6. The PUD plan meets the PU:p Int�nt ancl Purpose provision and all other PUD ordinance provisions. �.� = Conditions , '�� 1. The plans prepared by Baker Asj"ociates and submitted with the application on July 10, 2014, shall b��me a pa` of this approval. 2. The recommendatiqr�s and requir� ments outlinecJ.in the memo from the Fire Department to Jason Zimmerman;; Planning Manag�r., dated August 18, 2014, shall become �--part of this approv; L �4,, 3. The recommendations and requir� ents outlined in the m�emo from the Engineering Division to Jason Zim' erman, Planning ManagerT:,,dated August 18, 2014, shall become a part of this a provaL �'�t�� 4. Parkir�g in the lot south of Wayzat� Boulevard shall be limited to inv� tory veh,icles. Employee parking in this� rea will not be permitted. 5. l�`signage must meet the require nts of the City's Sign Code (Sectio` .20). 6. �his approval is subject to all other tate, federal, and local ordinances, regulations, or laws with authority over this development. 5. Informal Public Hearing — Preliminary Plan Review— Planned Unit Development (PUD) — Golden Villas — PUD #118 Applicant: Golden Villas, LLC Address: 9130 & 9220 Olson Memorial Highway Purpose: To construct a seven-story, 162-unit apartment building. Zimmerman stated that the applicant is proposing to develop a seven-story, 162 unit, market rate apartment building on the 2.57 acre site. He stated that the applicant is also seeking TIF assistance to help make the project financially feasible. He noted that 9130 Olson Memorial Highway contains a small, one-story office building, and 9220 Olson Memorial Highway contains the vacant bowling alley. Zimmerman referred to a site plan and explained that the proposed new building will be centrally located on the site. He stated that there will be two access points on Golden Valley Road, and a sidewalk will be constructed along Golden Valley Road. He referred to the parking on the site, and noted that the majority of the parking will be underground or Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission August 25, 2014 Page 8 enclosed on the ground floor level. There will be surFace parking on three sides of the building and a 20-foot wide fire drive aisle along the rear of the building. He discussed some of the features and amenities including, eight units with individual entrances, secure bicycle parking/storage, a pool, and terrace among others. Zimmerman noted that staff is recommending approval of the Preliminary PUD plan subject to the Engineering and Fire Department comments including: the relocation of parking out of the right-of-way, additional work on the stormwater system, the number and location of fire hydrants, and radio operability for emergency responders within the building. Kluchka asked if the applicant would be installing the sidewalk along Golden Valley Road. Zimmerman said yes. Kluchka asked if parking is allowed on Golden Valley Road. Zimmerman said he wasn't sure, but that he would find out. Segelbaum asked for clarification on the number of stories. Zimmerman stated that there are six stories above ground, and one underground. Segelbaum noted that the nearby JHAP property has TIF financing and asked if that will impact this proposa�. Zimmerman said the properties are viewed independently. Segelbaum referred to the number of parking spaces and the amount of impervious surface and asked if it seems reasonable to allow less parking, but more impervious surface. Zimmerman stated that if there are ways to redesign the 20-foot wide fire lane, there will be more options to explore ways to reduce the amount of impervious surface. Bill Stoddard, Applicant, stated that the former Tiburon project proposed for this site was six levels. He decided to have one level of underground parking which made it possible to reduce the height. He noted that on the street side of the building he is proposing some direct access units. He discussed other senior living facilities that he had deve�oped in Florida and discussed several of the amenities he plans for this project including a day spa, "car to go" options, and conservation measures including roof top solar and water conservation efforts. He said he loves this gateway location, but he can't do the project without TIF. He referred to a site plan and stated that the structural coverage on the site will be 42.7% which includes the buitding, parking areas, and the fire lane. Waldhauser asked Stoddard if he has done other project in this area, and who will be managing this project once it is built. Stoddard said he has done some developments in Minnetonka and in a few other locations. He said he will be interviewing management companies to manage the property. Segelbaum asked Stoddard if he will continue to own the property after the building is constructed, or if he plans to sell it. Stoddard said it is his intent to keep the property for a long time. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission August 25, 2014 Page 9 Segelbaum asked Stoddard if he thinks the proposed 223 parking will be adequate. Stoddard said he believes that amount of parking will be adequate. He added that he can add more parking spaces on the site if needed. He is also proposing bicycle and moped spaces and he wants to really push the "car to go" option. Blum asked if the moped spaces count in the overall number of parking spaces. Stoddard said no, and added that he is proposing 20 outdoor scooter spaces. Zimmerman agreed that the scooter spaces are viewed differently than regular parking spaces. Segelbaum asked Stoddard about the timeline of this project. Stoddard said this project will take approximately 13 months to construct, and he hopes to break ground next summer. Kluchka said he is interested in a sidewalk connection to let pedestrians know they are welcome to walk on the property, not just past it. He added that he would also like to see a high level of design and quality in this gateway location. Stoddard said he typically uses 1/3 brick, 1/3 panels and 1/3 Hardie board siding, or something similar, to break up the look. Kluchka opened the public hearing. Kris Soder, Brookview Condominiums, said she is concerned about the traffic impacts from this proposal. Naomi Gardner, Brookview Condominiums, asked if this entire project consists of rental units. Kluchka said yes. Seeing and hearing no one else wishing to comment, Kluchka closed the public hearing. Kluchka asked about the traffic issues. Zimmerman stated that a traffic study was done for the previously approved Tiburon project, and that this proposal is not much different. However, staff will continue to work with the applicant on ways to improve any traffic issues. Segelbaum asked about the status of the Highway 55 exit ramp. Zimmerman stated that the slip ramp reconstruction was part of the Tiburon proposal, but it is not part of this proposal. Segelbaum said he thought the ramp project was part of the TIF district proposal. Zimmerman stated that there is a redevelopment area that includes several parcels, but each project is different. Kluchka said he would like to see some intersection improvements, and he wants to see what the additional traffic will do to the wait times, not just the capacity issues. Zimmerman stated that the HRA will be reviewing this proposal. He added that one concern staff has is that MnDOT could close the slip ramp. He said the City does not want all the traffic to have to go to Boone Avenue. Segelbaum asked if there will be a neighborhood meeting held. Zimmerman said yes, the PUD process requires that a neighborhood meeting be held. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission August 25, 2014 Page 10 Kluchka suggested a condition be added regarding the review of design and materials. Segelbaum said he would like to add that language stating that review should also occur on the items not shown in the current plans in order to preserve the City's rights. Waldhauser agreed that it is difficult to tell at this point if the applicant and Planning Commission are aiming toward the same goals. MOVED by Segelbaum, seconded by Waldhauser and motion carried unanimously to recommend approval of the Preliminary PUD Plan for PUD #118, Golden Villas subject to the following findings and conditions: Findinqs: 1. The PUD plan is tailored to the specific characteristics of the site and achieves a higher quality of site planning and design than generally expected under conventional provisions of the ordinance. 2. The PUD plan preserves and protects substantial desirable portions of the site's characteristics, open space and sensitive environmental features including steep slopes, trees, scenic views, creeks, wetlands, and open waters. 3. The PUD plan includes efficient and effective use (which includes preservation) of the land. 4. The PUD Plan results in development compatible with adjacent uses and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and redevelopment plans and goals. 5. The PUD plan is consistent with preserving and improving the general health, safety and general welfare of the people of the City. 6. The PUD plan meets the PUD Intent and Purpose provision and all other PUD ordinance provisions. Conditions: 1. The plans prepared by Gronberg & Associates, Inc., submitted with the application on July 25 and August 11, 2014, shall become a part of this approval. 2. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Engineering Division to Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager, dated August 18, 2014, shall become a part of this approval. 3. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Fire Department to Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager, dated August 18, 2014, shall become a part of this approval. 4. The final design of materials and landscaping shall be reviewed and approved by the City prior to Fina� Plan approval. 5. All signage must meet the requirements of the City's Sign Code (Section 4.20). 6. A park dedication fee of$31,680 (2% of the estimated land value) shall be paid prior to approval of the Final Plat. 7. The Final Plat shall include "P.U.D. No. 118" in its title. 8. This approval is subject to all other state, federal, and local ordinances, regulations, or laws with authority over this development. --Short Recess— ci ty af �,, CC�� ► � E� � �� C,�. f�..'�T Planning Department �� 763-593-8095/763-593-8109(fax) ? '`. ,* 4 .>. .�� ,� . �,,,.*. �.—�'=i t,' .� ,; .. , ��.,;k a�-?#:`w.��,'��' .'��,� �, ... ;�,�^�r;:'=` Date: August 25, 2014 To: Golden Valley Planning Commission From: Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager Subject: Informal Public Hearing— Preliminary PUD Plan for Golden Villas PUD No. 118 —9130 and 9220 Olson Memorial Highway—Golden Villas, LLC,Applicant Background Golden Villas, LLC, represented by William Stoddard, is seeking approval of a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Permit to develop a seven story 162 unit market rate apartment building at 9130 and 9220 Olson Memorial Highway, The site currently houses a vacant bowling alley and a small office building. This is the location of the recent Tiburon Apartments development which was approved in 2012 but not constructed. The property is zoned R-4 High Density Residential and guided for long-term High Density Residential use on the General Land Use Plan map. The total area of the two lots is 2.57 acres; it is bounded by Olson Memorial Highway to the south and Golden Valley Road to the north. The adjacent property to the west contains the National Camera Exchange and the adjacent property to the east contains a small one story office building. If approved, the two subject parcels would be replatted into one lot. The project is located within the area designated as the Highway 55 West Development Area by the City's Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA). The Applicant has submitted an application to receive Tax Increment Financing (TIF) assistance in order to make the project financially feasible. Summary of Proposal The proposed PUD would allow the Applicant to construct a seven story 162 unit market rate apartment building centrally located on the site. A majority of the parking would be in an underground level as well as a portion of the ground level. Surface parking spaces would be located on three sides of the building. The remaining half of the first floor would contain the lobby and 8 one-bedroom units with individual entrances that would face Golden Valley Road. Levels two through six would contain a mixture of 14 studios, 106 one-bedroom units, and 42 Page 1 two-bedroom units. Additional amenities include an outdoor pool, a spa, secure indoor bicycle parking for residents, and a sixth floor outdoor terrace. The Applicant is also proposing to utilize some solar power and water conservation technologies. The total square footage of the building is estimated to be 246,272 square feet. Building materials are projected to be a mixture of brick, metal panels, and fiber cement siding. Unit sizes would range from 645 square feet to 1,188 square feet. 166 of the 223 parking spaces would be enclosed while 57 would be surface spaces. Preliminary plans indicate two spaces for car share vehicles, outdoor bicycle parking to compliment the indoor secure bicycle storage, and spaces for scooter/moped parking. The pool and terrace would be located on level two and at the rear of the building nearest Olson Memorial Highway. A sidewalk is proposed to be added to the north side of the site along Golden Valley Road. Landscaping is concentrated mainly around the perimeter of the site. While a significant amount of old pavement would be removed as part of the proposal, the massing of the new building, the surface parking spaces, and a 20 foot fire access lane around the rear of the property would increase the impervious surface amount to 80%. :-; �'�+ � _. � i ct1 � � _ "' Y `�.,� C `� � 0 0 !� � � j � � �� ' � 622-50 I �y � � .. ...`�'. ;�.+..�� .� � t � . t •, ' , . � g � .�" �.:,. „_. � v � f ... �..._ � . - � .._..._...,.__ �_...�s.—�.. �. e• �1 . c �� 1 � � �� . 884� �. 4 . . 9240 9140 � . � a- �� '1 9Q00 0 � 9210 � � 9110 �� 4 � � 9300 9200 9050 9000 8900 � ' � 9326 � . , '�. „ . ,� �.�.� _,� ; ._,v _. . . _ .: � ,. Y�. -_ - > �C>�t�� ,,,. � �` ""�� ° �,� _ _ .._�_ ,�. ,� : . � _x , . � .. _� � i �;� �.y :�,.. . � � � 8950 ,,..�.-_ ;� � 9 -4 .. i_ ' O O . �; �; ':,. . - 9300 9130 rn °' ': .�'"��• . � * � �:a.> �- _ a � _ , . _` , .,, � i �'� � `� 9220 "'°� •� .,�.a � . . . k . � . . _ a .� � � , _,. .s � , �� , _ � . _ . . . -_� _ .. . � �. �� . , . . - . � — : . . .�. , . � � �'` � �� ,�� : . ��n�� ' � . � ..: _F , . ,, . . e� , ,, � ,,, ,-. M , , . , � . � Q . . ,� - � � � '> , � .. - " �„� .. � (��{�'� �� .,�"�/.. � � m � 433 ��, � ,.,�,.��.� m_ � Q ,t_ �I ..a��'� M ."': �, ' y ' 9131 0 = 424 423 � �i _ . � E: ...�. 91d1 0' 421 _ � t' x. � 'Z � , , 9147 347 �,. N N �, u.--, �� ..�'` �e' C 410 � m a°�o �� 4t � '� �� ' } �� 9201 345 k� . ,.,�,�, �: ,� � 9143 339 �� ! �X �... � W � ` �;' 325 � v' r` " °' o �. m m rn rn � rn PUD 118 - Site Map Page 2 Land Use and Zoning Considerations The property was reguided for long-term High Density Residential use in the Comprehensive Plan and rezoned to R-4 High Density Residential zoning in 2012 in anticipation of the Tiburon Apartment project. As a PUD, the City can offer flexibility from the regular zoning requirements in order to achieve a better development. The following table summarizes how closely the requirements of the R-4 High Density Residential Zoning District are met under the current proposal: R-4 High Density Residential Golden Villas Use Multiple-family dwellings Apartment Density Over 12 units/acre 63 units/acre Dimensional Standards Height Maximum of 5 stories or 60 7 stories and 74 feet feet or else by CUP Minimum lot area 20,000 square feet 2.57 acres Minimum lot width 150' 480'+ Structure coverage 40% maximum unknown Impervious coverage 60% maximum approx. 80% Front setback 25' 35' Side and rear setback 20' approx. 40' Parking for 162 units 1.5 spaces per dwelling unit 243 223 Engineering and Fire Safety Considerations As is standard practice for development proposals, plans for this proposal were reviewed by the City's Engineering Division to ensure the site can be adequately served by public utilities and that any traffic issues are resolved. A memorandum from the Engineering Division that addresses easements, traffic, sanitary sewer and water services, storm water management, and tree preservation and landscaping is attached. The Fire Department reviewed this proposal to ensure that buildings are equipped with fire protection systems and that adequate emergency vehicle access is achieved on the site. A memorandum from the Fire Department that addresses fire access, water supply, fire hydrants, and emergency responder radio coverage is attached. Justification for Consideration as a PUD The PUD process is an optional method of regulating land use in order to permit flexibility in uses allowed, setbacks, height, parking requirements, and number of buildings on a lot. Staff has determined that this application qualifies as a PUD because it achieves the following standards established in City Code: • Encourages, preserves, and improves the health, safety and general welfare of the people of the City by encouraging the use of contemporary land planning principles. Page 3 • Achieves a high quality of site planning, design, landscaping, and building materials which are compatible with the existing and planned land uses. • Encourages creativity and flexibility in land development. • Encourages efficient and effective use of land, open space, streets, utilities, and other public facilities. • Allows mixing land uses and assembly and development of land to form larger parcels. • Encourages development in transitionaf areas which achieves compatibility with all adjacent and nearby land uses. • Achieves development consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. � Achieve development consistent with the City's redevelopment plans and goals. • Encourages development that is sustainable and has a high degree of energy efficiency. In order to be approved as a PUD, the City must be able to make the following findings: 1. Quality Site Planning. The PUD plan is tailored to the specific characteristics of the site and achieves a higher quality of site planning and design than generally expected under conventional provisions of the ordinance. 2. Preservation. The PUD plan preserves and protects substantial desirable portions of the site's characteristics, open space and sensitive environmental features including steep slopes, trees, scenic views, creeks, wetlands, and open waters. 3. Efficient—Effective. The PUD plan includes efficient and effective use (which includes preservation) of the land. 4. Compatibility. The PUD Plan results in development compatible with adjacent uses and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and redevelopment plans and goals. 5. General Health. The PUD plan is consistent with preserving and improving the general health, safety and general welfare of the people of the City. 6. Meets Requirements. The PUD plan meets the PUD Intent and Purpose provision and all other PUD ordinance provisions. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the Preliminary Plan for Golden Villas PUD No. 118, subject to the following conditions: 1. The plans prepared by Gronberg& Associates, Inc., submitted with the application on July 25 and August 11, 2014, shall become a part of this approval. 2. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Engineering Division to Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager, dated August 18, 2014, shall become a part of this approval. 3. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Fire Department to Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager, dated August 18, 2014, shall become a part of this approvaL 4. The final design shall be reviewed by the City prior to Final Plan approval. 5. All signage must meet the requirements of the City's Sign Code (Section 4.20). 6. A park dedication fee of$31,680 (2% of the estimated land value) shall be paid prior to approval of the Final Plat. Page 4 7. The Final Plat shall include "P.U.D. No. 118" in its title. 8. This approval is subject to all other state, federal, and local ordinances, regulations, or laws with authority over this development. Attachments Location Map (1 page) Applicant's Narrative (2 pages) Memo from the Public Works Division dated August 18, 2014 (6 pages) Memo from the Fire Department dated August 18, 2014 (2 pages) Site Plans submitted July 25 and August 11, 2014 (14 pages) Page 5 city of � O�1��1� M E N� t� � � � � � � � V � +a. � Public Works Department � 763-593-8030/763-593-3988(fax) Date: August 18, 2014 To: Jason Zimmerman, City Planner From: Jeff Oliver, PE, City Engineer Eric Eckman, Public Works Sp cialist��' Subject: Preliminary PUD Plan Review—Golden Villas (9130 and 9220 Olson Memorial Highway) Public Works staff has reviewed the Preliminary Planned Unit Development (PUD) Plans for Golden Villas as submitted by the Stoddard Companies. The proposed PUD is located at 9130 and 9220 Olson Memorial Highway in the northeast quadrant of the intersection of Trunk Highways 55 and 169. The redevelopment consists of combining two existing commercial properties to construct a seven-story, 162-unit, market-rate apartment building. This memorandum discusses issues identified during the Public Works review that must be addressed prior to approval of the Final PUD Plans. The comments contained in this review are based on the plans submitted to the City on July 28, 2014. Redevelopment of this site as a PUD was previously approved by the City Council as The Tiburon. A PUD Development Agreement will be drafted by the City at the time of final PUD approval which will outline additional conditions and costs associated with the development. Preliminarv Plat and Site Plan This redevelopment will consolidate two commercial properties to create one lot for the proposed apartment building. The two vacant commercial buildings include a former bowling alley and an office that will be demolished as part of the project.The new apartment building has an enclosed parking garage below the units (at ground level)that will provide 166 parking spaces, as well as two surface parking lots that will provide 57 spaces. The two existing driveways onto Golden Valley Road will be removed and replaced with two new driveways located at the northwest and northeast corners of the site. The property proposed for redevelopment is adjacent to Trunk Highway 55; therefore, it is subject to review and comment by the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT). MnDOT had previously reviewed the plans for The Tiburon PUD and provided comment to the G:\Developments-Private\Golden Villas(Tiburon)\Villas_Prelim PUD review 081814.docx City; however,the plans have been modified from the previous proposal must therefore be resubmitted for review. The property proposed for redevelopment was previously unplatted and there are no recorded easements running in favor of the City. However,the preliminary plat shows several easements or agreements that involve public rights-of-way adjacent to the property. The Developer must submit copies of each of these documents to the City for its evaluation. The site survey indicates that the north property line is the centerline of Golden Valley Road and references County Board Proceedings. This easement across the north 33 feet of the property is for roadway purposes atong Golden Valley Road and must be vacated and re-dedicated as public right-of-way on the final plat. The City's Subdivision Ordinance requires 10-foot drainage and utility easements on the plat boundaries and 12-foot easements centered on all interior lot lines. The final plat for this development must include easements on all property lines, consistent with the City's Subdivision Ordinance and as shown on the pretiminary plat. The Site Plan submitted for review indicates that a portion of the parking stalls on the north side of the building will encroach into the right-of-way(existing easement)for Golden Valley Road. Because the Golden Valley Road corridor is heavily utilized by private utility companies for below- ground installations and for snow storage, the Site Plan must be re-evaluated to remove the parking stalls from the right-of-way. The City will consider issuance of a Right-of-Way Permit for placement of the parking stalls within the platted drainage and utility easement along Golden Valley Road. The Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) owns and operates two sanitary sewer forcemains near the south property line. The Developer must show the MCES forcemains on the plans, as well as the corresponding easements, if applicable. Furthermore,the Developer must submit the proposed Site Plan to the MCES for their review and comment. A Right-of-Way Permit is required for driveway work and for all excavations and obstructions in public right-of-way. Additionally,the Developer or Contractor will be required to obtain the appropriate permits for all activities associated with demolition and removals prior to commencing work. The proposed Site Plan includes the installation a 20-foot wide paved emergency access road around the south side of the building, connecting the parking lots on each side of the site. As discussed in the Utility Plan portion of this memorandum, the addition of the fire hydrants onsite will allow flexibility in the design of this access roadway which will also provide options for relocation of the parking stalls on the north side of the site, outside of the Golden Valley Road right-of-way as discussed above. The determination of access road width and location must be included on the final PUD submittal and will be subject to the review and comment of the Fire Department and the Engineering Department. G:\Developments-Private\Golden Villas(Tiburon)\Villas_Prelim PUD review 081814.docx 2 The new driveway aprons into the site must be constructed according to City standards for commercial driveway aprons. These specifications will be provided to the Developer at the time of issuance of the Right-of-Way Permit. Traffic and Access Mana�ement The existing street system in the vicinity of this development is adequate to accommodate the new vehicle trips generated by the development. However, the intersection of Golden Valley Road, Decatur Avenue, and Trunk Highway 55 has existing operational issues that are currently being evaluated. While adequate capacity is present at the intersection, modifications are being considered to maximize safety and efficiency. The City's Comprehensive Plan shows proposed sidewalks along Mendelssohn Avenue, Golden Valley Road, Decatur Avenue, and 7th Avenue from Plymouth Avenue to Boone Avenue. The development is adjacent to this route;therefore,the Developer will be required to construct a portion of the sidewalks and pedestrian facitities in this area. It is anticipated that this will include the construction of a six-foot concrete walk meeting City Standards and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) guidelines on the south side of Golden Valley Road, along the entire length of the property. Utilitv Plan The City's sanitary sewer and water systems that provide service to these properties have adequate capacity to accommodate the proposed redevelopment. The Developer has demonstrated that extension of services is possible, as shown on the Utility Plan. According to the City's record drawings, there are three sewer laterals serving the existing property. The plans submitted include the installation of a new sanitary sewer service to the building near its northeast corner, but does not indicate the removal of the existing sanitary sewer services. The final plans must be modified to include the removal of the three existing services from the main within Golden Valley Road to the end of the service. The new sewer service will be privately owned and maintained by the Developer, consistent with City Code. City record drawings indicate there are three water services serving the existing property. The Developer proposes to install new domestic and fire protection water services to the building. However, as with the sewer services, the plans do not indicate removal of the existing water services and must be modified to identify their removal from the main to the point they are cut off during building demolition. The water services will be owned and maintained by the City from the City's watermain up to and including the shut off vatves located at the street right-of-way line. The Developer will own and maintain the services between the shut-off valves and into the buildings. The proposed Utility Plan also indicates the extension of two fire hydrants into the site from the City watermain in Golden Valley Road. The proposed hydrants are located near the northwest and northeast corners of the apartment building and are acceptable as proposed. However, the plan must be modified to include the relocation of two additional hydrants to the southwest and G:\Developments-Private\Golden Villas(Tiburon)\Villas_Prelim PUD review 081814.docx 3 southeast corners of the building. The installation of these two additional hydrants will provide flexibility in Fire Department response. In addition, the hydrant relocation will provide flexibility in possible revision of the Site Plan to remove the parking stalls on the north side of the building from the Golden Valley Road right-of-way. The modifications to the Site Plan and Utility Plan must be included with the final PUD submittal. The Developer or Contractor will be required to obtain the appropriate Sewer and Water Permits from the City for the removal and installation of the sanitary sewer and water services. In addition, permits may be required from MCES and MnDOT for work within their respective easements and rights-of-way. A City Right-of-Way Permit is required for the obstruction or excavation of City streets and right- of-way. The plans show that Golden Valley Road will be open cut in several locations;therefore, a Right-of-Way Permit is required for the work. In addition, because the City overlaid Golden Valley Road with new asphalt in 2012, an increased level of restoration is required for this roadway. According to City standards, cutting a pavement less than five years old requires a full-width pavement mill and overlay at a length determined by the City Engineer. The exact method, scope, and cost of restoration will be determined by the City and included in the PUD Development Agreement. The work must be performed immediately following the utility and driveway installation. The City has an Inflow and Infiltration (I/I) Ordinance that requires the sanitary sewer service to be brought into compliance when developing or subdividing a property. The Developer will be removing the existing sewer laterals to the main;therefore,the new lateral will require an I/I Permit and televised inspection upon construction. The new lateral must achieve compliance with the I/I Ordinance, prior to occupancy of the building. In order to ensure that the existing laterals will be removed, the Developer will be required to post a financial security. Staff will determine the amount and include this item in the I/I Deposit Agreement which must be executed between the Owner and the City. The Developer will be required to enter into a Utility Maintenance Agreement for the long-term maintenance and operation of the fire hydrants onsite. This agreement will be prepared by the City for execution at the time of final PUD approval. Stormwater Mana�ement and Gradin� The property being redeveloped is located within the Main Stem sub-watershed of the Bassett Creek Watershed;therefore, it is subject to the review of the Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission (BCWMC). The BCWMC will review the plans for compliance with its water quality standards. This redevelopment is subject to the City's Stormwater Management Ordinance. A City Stormwater Management Permit will be required before the start of construction. Upon approval of the Stormwater Management Plan by the City, the Developer must submit the plans to the G:\Developments-Private\Golden Villas(Tiburon)\Villas_Prelim PUD review 081814.docx 4 BCWMC for its review and comment. The City will not issue permits for new construction or site work until approval from the BCWMC is received. The preliminary grading plan submitted for review must be modified and resubmitted with the final PUD submittal to meet City specifications. The Developer has proposed stormwater quality treatment facilities as part of this redevelopment consisting of an underground pipe gallery for rate control and volume reduction through infiltration. More information on the design and anticipated maintenance of the underground infiltration system must be provided to the City in order to ensure a proper review. It is recommended that the Developer include sump manholes or other pre-treatment devices to remove sediment from stormwater runoff, prior to discharge into the infiltration system. The installation of sediment-capture devices upstream of the infiltration system will facilitate sediment removal prior to infiltration and will maximize the lifespan of the infiltration system. The Developer will own and maintain the entire stormwater conveyance and treatment system onsite and will be required to enter into a Maintenance Agreement for these facilities. The agreement will be drafted by the City and must be signed, prior to approval of the Final PUD Permit. The Stormwater Management Plans include a discharge from the infiltration system into the north ditch of Trunk Highway 55. Therefore, approval of the Stormwater Management Plan is subject to the review and comment of MnDOT. Due to the size of this development, a Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Construction Stormwater Management Permit will be required. The Developer must provide a copy of this permit to the City once it is obtained. The City Stormwater Management Permit will not be issued until a copy of the permit is provided. Tree Preservation Plan and Landscape Plan This development is subject to the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance and Minimum Landscape Standards. The City Forester has reviewed the plans and inspected the site. The Developer has proposed the removal of significant trees and has provided a plan for mitigation. Therefore, a Tree Preservation Permit is required for this redevelopment. The City Forester will review the Tree Preservation Pfan and Landscape Plan in more detail as part of the Final PUD review. Cost estimates for landscaping must also be provided in order to determine the financial securities which must be posted by the Developer, as part of the PUD Development Agreement. Summarv and Recommendations Public Works staff recommends approval of the Preliminary PUD Plans for Golden Villas, subject to the comments contained in this review. These comments are summarized as follows: 1. The plans must show the construction of a concrete walk along Golden Valley Road, as discussed in this review. G:\Developments-Private\Golden Villas(Tiburon)\Villas_Prelim PUD review 081814.docx 5 2. The Developer must submit copies to the City of all existing easements and agreements, as discussed above. 3. The easement for roadway purposes along Golden Valley Road must be vacated and re- dedicated as Public Right-of-Way on the Final Plat. 4. The Developer must enter into a Maintenance Agreement for the private hydrants and valves, as discussed in this review. 5. The proposed hydrants within the site must be relocated, as discussed in this review. 6. The proposed building must become compliant with the City's Inflow and Infiltration Ordinance, prior to occupancy of the building. 7. A Right-of-Way Permit will be required for the excavation of Golden Valley Road and the street must be restored to City standards, as discussed in this memorandum. 8. Information on the design of the underground stormwater infiltration system must be provided to the City. 9. The Developer must enter into a Maintenance Agreement for the stormwater quality treatment facilities onsite, as discussed in this review. 10. The Developer or its contractors must obtain the appropriate permits prior to development, as discussed above. 11. The Developer must enter into a PUD Development Agreement, pay alf fees, and post all securities and/or deposits, as determined necessary in this or subsequent reviews. 12. Fina� PUD approval is subject to the review and comments of the Minnesota Department of Transportation, Metropolitan Council Environmental Services,the Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission, and other agencies as required. Approval is also subject to the comments of the City attorney and other City staff. Please feel free to call if you have any questions regarding this matter. C: Tom Burt, City Manager John Crelly, Fire Chief Mitch Hoeft, Utilities Engineer AI Lundstrom, Park Maintenance Supervisor and City Forester Bert Tracy, Public Works Maintenance Manager Kelley Janes, Utilities Supervisor Jerry Frevel, Building Official G:\Developments-Private\Golden Villas(Tiburon)\Villas_Prelim PUD review 081814.docx 6 ��lt �t �� lJ�C�� .,��,.� � Fire Department 763-593-8Q79/ 763-593-849$ (fax} Date: August 18, 2014 To: Jason Zimmerman, Pianning Manager From: lohn Crelly, Fire Chief Subject: PUD #118 Preliminary Plan for Golden Villas, L.L.C. (9130 & 9220 Olson Memorial Hwy) The Golden Valley Fire Department has reviewed the preliminary PUD plans and application packet which includes the preliminary site plan, utility plan, landscaping and proposed building plans. Listed below are the fire department comments. 1. The plan shows a 20 foot wide access road around the entire building and appears to meet the requirements of Minnesota State Fire Code section 503.1. In the PUD packet, Exhibit IV titfed "Development Concept and Rationale for Variance Requests" it indicates future discussions on ways to reduce impervious areas. These discussions should take place soon as they impact the site plan. 2. The water supply system for the proposed site shall be capable of supplying the required fire flow for this building based on location, type of construction and size of building. Minnesota State Fire Code Appendix B and C will require a minimum total flow of 2000 gpm from a minimum of 2 fire hydrants with an average spacing of 450 feet. Currently there are City fire hydrants along Golden Valley Road on the northwest corner and the eastern third of the proposed property. The proposed fire hydrants on the west and east side should be relocated to the south setting up an average spacing of 450 feet between fire hydrants. 3. Private fire hydrants shall meet the City's specifications and shall be paint red in color. 4. All connections to private fire service mains for fire protection systems shall be arranged in accordance with 2010 edition of NFPA 24 section 6.2.11 options 1, 2 or 6. a. Option 1: A Yard Post Indicator Valve (YPIV) 40 feet from the building. b. Option 2: no YPIV,just bring the fire protection water directly into a 1 hour fire rated room with direct exterior access into the room. c. Option 3: no YPIV,just bring the fire protection water directly into a non-fire rated room and providing a Wall Post Indicator Valve (WPIV). One of these options will be required Page 1 of 2 to be installed on the 6-inch fire protection water line on the northeast corner of the building. The PIV is an indicating valve to control the operation of the water supply to the fire suppression system for the proposed building. 5. The installation of the fire hydrants shall be within 150 feet of any fire department sprinkler/standpipe connection located on the building. The plan does not indicate a location of the fire department connection. City and private fire hydrants may be used when determining the 150 feet distance. 6. The type and placement of landscaping trees/shrubs for this site shall not obstruct or hinder the ladder operation from any secondary escape windows from any apartment units located in this building. 7. Radio operability—Alt new buildings shall have approved radio coverage for emergency responders within the building based upon the existing coverage levels of the public safety communication systems of the jurisdiction at the exterior of the building. The building shall be considered to have acceptable emergency responder radio coverage when signal strength measurements in 95 percent of all areas on each floor of the building meet the minimum signal strength requirement of-95 dBm receivable and transmittable from the building. 8. The construction of this building shall comply with all applicable codes. If you have any questions, please contact me at 763-593-8065 or by e-mail, jcrelly@�oldenvallevmn.�ov Page 2 of 2 Narrative, Development Concept and Rationale for Yariance Requests Narrative & Develoument Concept• Our proposed development of approximately 162 market-rate apartments on Olson Memorial Highway just east of highway 169 will meet the purpose and numerous other provisions of the City of Golden Va11ey's PUD Ordinance, Comprehensive Plan, Land Use Goals and Housing Goals, and the City's Redevelopment Plans in addition to the Metropolitan Council's increased density goals. Our seven story building will have one full story below grade for parking, a Street Level for additional parking, eight rentable townhomes, lobby, storage,maintenance, etc., and five stories of residential units and amenities above. Leve12 will have an amenity terrace with swimming pool, fitness room, club room and day spa a11 opening onto the amenity terrace. Our Penthouse/Leve16 will have an outdoor terrace facing southeast with expansive views of Golden Valley's golf courses, open areas, and the downtown Minneapolis skyline. Our design team at ESG Architects is designing a custom 5 story wood frame building over two stories of concrete with a beautiful exterior fa�ade including a mixture of brick,metal panel and fiber cement siding, with extra-large efficient windows to take advantage of Golden Va11ey's outstanding views. The modified U shaped building will be approximately 246,272 squaze feet in size with abundant landscaping and parking. Contemparary land planning and exterior design vision was incorporated into our team's mission. Environmentally friendly features of our(yet to be named development) will include Solar Power features using Minnesota made solar panels and installed by Minnesota laborers. We will thereby replace a portion of"Grid power with Green power." In addition we will utilize many advanced Water Conservation Technologies including moderators, showerheads, flushometers and ballcock& diverter supply components to reduce our water consumption at our building. We also will strive for Alternative Transportation, car sharing and compact car use by providing designated parking spaces including Car2Go vehicle spaces,ample indoor/outdoor bicycle and mopedJscooter parking spaces. Under a separate cover we are submitting a T�Increment Financing Application along with the required $10,000.00 TIF Application Fee to the City as our proposed development is contingent on TIF financing and"but for TIF financing,this project will not be developed by us." Two properties have been assembled for our project and the public will benefit in numerous ways with the City's economic base enhancement, including job creation of about 8-12 on-site employees and approximately 240 construction jobs, a large blighted building will be removed, and additional unsubsidized private development will be encouraged after our development spearheads new activity in the area. The diversity of housing products will be enhanced with our offerings including rentable street level townhomes with individual entrances(pet owners will love these), 1 BR alcove units, 1 BR units, 1 BR/Den units, 2 BR units and Penthouse units offering higher ceilings, fireplaces, finish levels and more! Variance Requests: At this time we are requesting three variances from standard zoning requirements including a variance to a11ow over 60% impervious surfaces, a variance to allow parking to be located within the north front yard setback; and a height variance. The basis for our variance requests is that they are necessary to construct a building with enough density to be competitive in the marketplace with our market rate rental apartment building. We are trying to maximize the site with the building footprint and height to reach critical density. To meet that necessity on this site it is necessary to have five levels of wood framing over one to two levels of the concrete parking structure. We decided on two concrete levels (both are primarily parking levels-one fu11y underground),as it helped us add not only more covered parking,but adds the street level townhome units and offered us more room to spread out our amenities and building features. Therefore our building height will vary from grade and be approximately 74 feet in height and seven stories, versus sixty feet and five stories, and have parking a few feet closer to the Golden Valley Road right-of-way on the north side than standard zoning requirements allow. In addition the 20 foot perimeter fire access road around the entire building adds much impervious area to our project,thus requiring our request from standard zoning requirements. We will discuss this requirement more fully during the design review process with City Staff and City Fire Departments to determine if other fire protection options will help reduce the size of the impervious road. Our design will be somewhat fluid in the next couple months as we go through the City of Golden Valley design review process and we will strive to meet your concerns. File: GV Development Concept and Rationale S�Yf>'�fiL�4�� •AM� ��C�Lf' Z7V��NOHd 5ta�s� ss�2�N3BW(iN35N3�11"NNIW ��9 31V� � ___ 33HS. j�_��Z�� i-/ � 9':+E�S I�RAf`�11`d� J�d4l 3�ARla MO'I"IIM'N 5trh ao�-v� -- a�,�� — -- �eloseuwW)o ele1S aUi Jo s�v�el a41 -- -- -- — 31�rfNit'1-.l(7A�It/�'S2{UA3A21f1S 4Nb�l`52133NI'JN311AIJ Ac=.�L �epun�o�(ening pue�pesuaoi�R�np e we I 1e41 Pue N—d�-- --- — - L 3TM�._ SN21VW321 A9 31V0 '��'I S�.L�'I�O�S't� � J2138NO2�J 4L-LL-9 uoisin�adns�oa�ip,(w�apun�oaw,(qpa�eda�dse,H _ 31� uoda��o'ue�d'Renmssiy��ey��Ne�Rqwey� 3N�JIS3 SNOISI/��2i �._��'�"` . ■ �/iw� � � � a- � ■ � � � ►T J � � W I N � � � � LL W .� � � �- z � � � � I � Q � � Z Q � � � � p � � � � C� E— > � � o �, Z O — W � w � 11 � — � � � ,. J , W . , � �, i � -- -- — — -- -- -- -- ��—``— , � � � i� �� \ �� I � ��o � � � � 1 1� � T 'U \ \ ` � , � EEI E£ �—_ �'� , � � ��A� �� V � , I � �� . ...--- � �a��' --�"-� _ _ __ �`. .l _ �_. _ , ___ 00�e -�* —=-�———---�—__ �� -' � �- �-/�� \__--�\ �,� � \' `��`\ 11-�� 1 � I , ' � -- — -- � J � �� — �\ ��Q �1 1 � I � l I � C�� \ �� ' � I � � � ?W \ �� \11�� , / � `-� �o � � � ��1�� 1 � �m I/ 1 I �� V 1� ' m w ` � � �� , �� 1 �11 � 1 � � Zw 1� I � 11 1 1 1 � 1 I � I � ° — �_-m �1 ��I � ' d \ 11 I =o I 1 � � Qo � x° � �. � II�� I � � a� w � M� `'�� 1 �, � I i �m ,,�-1 �,_` �1 I ��I� �, � � � gt 1 � �� 1 I1�� 1� i � < < z I' , ` , � 1 � ,� , , � � � i ii�� s' � � �� i e �_, 1 I� 1�11�� `� �, �, � �i �� II . �, � ��,�,, z5.4Q � I� I I�I� � � O 1, I � �� I �` � �� l --_ � � II II 11 �� _ �� —, � II � 2 \ I �� ----- � � II�� , __ i. _. i - r2o.00 � �. I'1�11 .� 1_ _ __ _ _ - _ � _ � 1 � , / I I 11�� , � �, � = I � `� °��'�Z�� 1 � I / d �7 � W � � 11�, 1 S � I � I I \ �� III�� ' � i ; z �`-�---------�' � II �� j��lll � $ `, I o� I I � ` � � � �� - � II�� c � �_ � , o �� , i ii � - � I a d � �— � _ � �� , 2 �, � zo � —, , Z� ��!� ' i � , < <o `�i�� , ... .. ._.�, ..... .. `.. a W � � � �� , °� � '1 � � ��II� � �W � ��' � � � g� zo � � � �il� �� 11 � ,1 � " \ —w I s.o I � I \ � °o � s�s°,��b'��'I f � �i,L � � � � �� , �� I I � �� I r m N � I " � �� c.�� I I�I I ��I l � �� . � l ,, I I I � I � � � Zm I ) � II�� I ; � " � o� � �� X° � �� \ . M A N �' '�~ I 1 � ��I I I \ ` � w� � I 1 � /� IIT�� I ,� / „III � �; I I �I ;; i L - -� � IIIz I � Iss, ee w � � -- � �� I � � � �•, ti II —� / _ �,/�� I�� I I � --- I 00'Z8Z 3��b�00S �--' � ��sb�l��lo�I I � � � \,�/ �� / � ��,fQ�� I ' I I - � / I�r�'� = I � �� °�� I�� , \� r� / ,�� _ � I I �� I �� / � I 1 � I I�I �► �, ,�`� \ /1 �� I I 1 � � � ✓ � I //�� I ` ' ��//��( �� // I/ / �� v/��l ��l � �s� a�> ��_ � � ,�—v^. _��r._ —— �..__._ ——--—— ——N oo•za�sa•w ! .�— _� —— � rn y� � I � �N � �� i a mZ ( m � op � I � � �� o AI � NA I �'£ I EE V I , 1 ....._...._ Ai N 00°24'S4"W 485.39 I m i �;:..... 203.39 • - 282.00 � , - .., ,... - ... I '------...-- "�`-----•------------•---�----•-------------- ' 3.0 ,: _...._--- •.:_' . 65.._._• � a�P� 248.98 � W 3 4 w ' O r�::.. �oz g <�oo?? � m .•Ai., no{ � '7rSy'6' O,Z rn co � mZ� s, m N n�i I � I r� y � �I �� q �D Q Q I ' � i i Z ..� mw_ e �, o 0 I m >vay 4' �z � J� � ^; N p �A�� I 'm yr I �9'V r �r o c�0 bl J m $�2(mj w '•-`A" �� a� W N I � �� O �Z�� m'I '� � -i � � � w�TO r pp;59._.. �= r r ' � �� -� NAz4� �'rM.O9,ELe9ON 6 I x '� �vmi w w w m �� Z `�O��pm-i �'�> '. �r o . m _ AOm N N . "'"'_' I y " """'" A �j Z J�f"/)O i N N111 N r N � ��3C � -� � . � r o �� - i � � � , , �, - w � ��- . � � f �� i � � -o«=---- � ;� o '•:'o"o t .. . • .o r� I _ - �� .� --- . � _ .. ' , � m �. �� :--�----�----------�.-- --�-------------�------------ ------- Z ` ------------- - ----------�-�-------...----------.----------------�--�- ..._ ,.. : "�-- -• S00°14'19"E 174.22•. ::7�2 �' � � �m I ' � 1 I -.""'-'- Z'Ol 4 ', z -�---------------------�•--'- -----�--�--�------�---•-- � : N � � 3,�b5�bZe00S ', ,/ ,,. „, 'Z--- �D �� , �� cn� �m � .I-•-"--�--..- mo �� - '�00'09L i ,.�Z oz �"1 � `o� �o m ' � zN m � �o 1_........- • e � W W Nm � Z 1 � � ab � _cwn� p°G � > � A � p �D I D,g Z W N� W � �F � tntn . � 1 I �A< t� �rm- �'� � �I m< � w �� ` � �ZA N ?� � °f Q Av �� 000 O N- '.i. �'' 00 °' px 1 I �;Nf °' ^'_ �o A Ulr oQwr 2C n ; Z � nm � � � Sm � �� ',�; O � �o � , 1 �m �r � I IOf �Z � 1 ..Zl NZ �A. lO N� � ( . m Iv � A �1 I;.M��ti,�5^�a•p� ( � � • � o , f-.za , I m 1 ,,,� N ,r•n . 2�1.9�� . 33.00 • Z� � � ��`�p5�r'f`"L��4� o�� - N 00`14'19"W 234.95 �; 33 33 i � ' w i � �` ; m ( o � I i , � N00°14'19"W 582.50 '� I--L_ 4. --- /� —— —— -—— -- �}1�i< "_' y 219.3+- ! �— _� v �— � . 1� �e' '� y� I , � � � `1 I y � I "'-i � Ar ' �\� (�Z mm 111 j� w I "z :�� m`1 � �°A I I: ' � I w�� . 1`' • m � $ �� .,,, . ,'� o�,' N-- 64,9VaZt � ,1`90, m •�1 � I m � 1 O N m n ln -n+ -+� O Q A Z Zr w �m �,� �� N ,��?' � . OS'LZb 3.Cb�E0,00S _� /� --��.. , ___�__ _— _— __ � / � V Z � "'� �ei/ m O Z m � � _ _ � Z � 7�0 � a'�°� I � � o p � 6� �� y n n _ ��.3' 10I S � o �/► � �� --- .� "' e g z '�C z �� r=— � Z o � � � � � �� ,a � � � � ga i � m � �� rnr zn �� rn c,, N � ,i O O � O � � D � � N n i i / I hereby certiy that this survey,plan,or report /+ waspreparedbymeorundermydireclsupervision �-��14 GROLVBERG & ASSOCIATES� �N�s. DATE BY REMARKS and that 1 am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under A t elawsollheStateofMinnesota. ��-50' CIVIL ENGINEERS,LAND SURVEYORS,LAIdD PLAMNERS ,a-�as 445 N.WILLOW DRIVE LO[UG LAKE,IVIN 55356 oA�7-�s�y ,N �NS N �z�ff � °e„EE.s PHONE: 952-473-4141 FAX: 952-473-4435 � � GOLDEiV VILLAS L.L.0 W� � ZZ� � ' � �/i�Z ��,' � PRELIMINARY L�INDSC�4PE PLi4N �a� N 1�-�'� a�s U/�°� ua. �-�_'�--- � , I l�W Monument Z � GOLDEN VALLEY ROAD _ _ _ s�y� � I � � S 88°51'19"W 335.95 I ��O °' R=3819.72A=02°09'02"L=1 .38 - - --.. LLI r' - 2 C a r '. o ' � �2� � _ ' Share : o �ft Q� st ---- � Spaces: � W J� M co ' � vaoaoseo sioEwuK a - ti R_3 A= 2`10'33" =143.80 0 0 0 0 � � d HB I ��O � u/ 18: ° j �-�-�� a H OPOSEDGUTTERLttJE �o�o O a --.---.. . . . ', . . . . . . . . . . �T C � I �Z 7 � ` � : � • : : : : : �� . . . . . . . . . . .. BIACKTOP ' _ — � Z W O SB _ _ I .. H _— -- -- __ � Z ——' PROPOSED GUTfERLINE J Building O 5� _ d PR PROPOSEDSIDEWALK SBtbeCk �V� �' o 54.00 0 - . - � Llne I i.� a E' o Outdoor . m - : 0 66.00 ..� . . � m Parkin9 6 I � ' 209.50 � -..- � °� � ....... � ,4.SO ..I..... � N i I I � S I • ._ __..... r ' : .I.._-. � < • - CL cooted: _-.a- � -.. � '" I � c o' � Moped � . so _.�$. $ 3��i� �a � � Parkinog : ._ .._... ; o _ � Z I 1e � �N°� N : °� - PROPOSED BUILDiNG � � � ! ry � ...... N _' / I . s 14.50 • � N � � � � � � I G 30 60 120 o .p I PD I_ � I � ,a I � i `� I � SCALE IN FEET . . . • • / / Q I -.._. . ` ' ' 13..50 '' I • 44.00 . � � � m � VENT VENT • �� I � � � a Q � 99.00 N '� '. • • � �� PR � I I o m PN � W � � 5 ', \ 64.0o PR �� i' � Npp �� S ?o ' � N: � '� M pg M No1 � :. � � I _... ` 8.: � II �' � �' : � PRp,1R�E SEE� 3 E 206.9� a � ,' `�',\p , d ' � �!y—i— �� e�°�` NT��pB � � � SYMBOL PLANT/SPECIES QUANTITY --— 1 �a \ w'� I TREES � �� N �� OS'�3�E �453, No 11� AUT MN BRILLIANCE SERVICEBERRY 2 o nt \ ��_ � 7l° I `�� w °oo , AMELi�NCHIERXGRANDIFLORA'AUTUMNBRILLIANCE' � � • R=889.93�=06°40'00"L=103•55 0o N �� . �,o� � , PR PRAIRIE ROSE CRAB APPLE >> aT��; i T�J� Z �,�ti yo,'`�O o � : i PD CORN S AL�TERN�F�OLIA 3 '``� U Q-'cP^'� m q Y o�o � o�. 55 JT JAPANEST TREE LILAC � Q �; NSYRINGA RETICULATA L�'�^ � ' 1 I HB COMMON HACKBERRY 2 t m E� ' � �� : CELTIS OCCIDENTAL�S g„�o � �`��v V 1, i PN PARKWAY NORWAY MAPLE 5 rd A� � K ACER PLANTANOIDES'PARKWAY NORWAY' �„�" � ��`r � SHRUBS `;�L � `� � � ' HC HEDGE COTONEASTER » « � L��'C� _�� COTONEASTER LUCIDIS 52 Z Z �Y � � WB WINTERGREEN BOXWOOD � 3 �� _i BUXUS MIRCOPHYLLA'KOREANA' 18 W o U � CL COMMON LILAC _i"� SYRINGA VULGARIS I ,`, �-� PERENNIALS � H HOSTA VAR �� I i"� HYDRANGEA MACROPHYLLA PIHM-1 � i �� I i�� Z� I �" Oa � �-� fn� -� � � W � I > � m w F � � I 14-149 zAa > n�z �� _ mw �N G I �N � I II I I I I I' I Z �` ' ��N O II . < ' I i°(Q pj2 I �a� �.�o �Q� ��`S9�s I S 00°24'S4"E 282.00`� " � °o ' 's;•:,-� 3 oa �• . F1�T._.,--f-�_ . . , . . p� I PROPOSED _PROPOSE� 70�ER/E ; WTLE7PIPE � --, =o � � 33� '33 � r--------- I No w 4 � PROPOSED UNDERGROUND m � � �_�� STORMWATER ST BAGE � � I � � I W , � � Q ; Q I c� 2� Op j m� � �e I I O� I p f� N� � -� G�.�7 �< I DN W Dx I '�I j� I O A A �� m0 �O I N r O O � -I l�n 3 al r p D � � N 'o '—'z�i I�� 9 0.3 3 1 B.00 � W �i N » w ;� �, z� / I � 'v �� f-.�p.. I A o r ,, m � o '....... IN -� % 3„09,£6>90 S ',', 1 � �''� I 1 t� 90.� � � " �-� I � � 1 � IA <;D ; � Z 1 �p= ` y � f I �� , 18.00 p � � � 28.00 ..�... 1 '� � �': O � G � � � �$ r � z 1 � � �g �?° � I � �� I �x � � , � , 1 15.83 � I � 1 AO y 1 � I I O I 1 � p � ` � 1\ � I � 9 � I , � � o N r ` S oo�z4�,o'2 1� g m � 1'_ � � � ..�.� NN� C•S I � �Q�OZ 1 � I ��() ............................�--........_................. ..._.._.._.._. . � ,._....�-. .. ._1".Z . -�--.....1._.............._....._...........�........... ._..__. ..._.._. .. .._...... .. ....... ....I-....... � -y1-� � I ( « 1 2 1 `I 1 .83 C �o � �W= � � 2� r pp w O ��yZ ' Q m� ....I. � O I • Z � � � 1 ImA � `�, � � � 8 W v �r � I W � � � � N �, N. , z �-, I � \ � �ICi � �a� ; � � W 1 1 � $m..._�.. �� ( �I 'w, � ` � 1.50 �p.... . m o INg I I An , � � ml � �� , � , 1 o I 1 � � �> , � � ��Z � ��_ � 125.00 1 lop N� � g� ��;$ g�,l 1 p� °Nm I <m DVOi�o pN 1 ]I< p0 ql m0 , M�L4.�9oQ�0 — —� _ g.m .g°+ Q . � �� ' � N I � �- 1 �_ ,• � , �- m ..........._......_...__�__�� .....__.._.._._...._..i... ' ... �- N 00°14'19"W 234.95 ��2�A9 �' p8� rmm \ 734� m..�a 1 , '�"� I 33 33 I � � 1 _ � � — � � , I rr, 1 � � r_ G� , -- -- -- - -- ---`,------ -- --- -- ; � C, � � r �� rn , , z ' � o � < rr � W � r � � nD r �m o � =-- � Z r � �rn m �r � � N O REVISIONS ESIGNE Iherebycertiythatthisplan,specihcation,orreport g-17�4 GRONBERG & ASSOCIATES INC. DATE BY REMARKS was preparetl by me or under my dired supervision su�e 7 and that I am a duty lieensed Professional Engineer DRA uneertne�awsofthestateotn�innesota. �"=30' CIVIL ENGINEERS,LAND SURVEYORS,LAND PLANNERS cH KE .� ++-+ae 445 N.WILLOW DRIVE LONG LAKE,MN 55356 DATE - MMN.LICENSE NUMBER iz�r °s„EE,s PHONE:952-473-4141 FAX:952-473-4435 � i � i i ' I ' I � I a��.�, �� d�� `��' ' �� SyAs S00°24'S4"E 282.0010�`� � -- �6''`�:" 248.96 3 04 - � —. ��, • , � � � 33 '33 _—� � �— -- — — W i � � � � � � � I � � ' W �'. I Q � �, � tn; I m O � N � I � N o L.... � I w �i y 3 O I A 61�'7 A I `' N �C r � � Ii � � N �� ,g.�� o ..... 90.33 W N I � w I ro � � � � o r 7 3.05,£6<90S �.__.. I I 8 , � 906 . . � g%�I � ,`� , 8 �� m ; 0 1 � . o � � 18.00 � � ' � 28.00 .. ... �. � .. . . .......:.. � , � � � � � : O , G Z 1 � e t" 1 � � ` � I g I m � , � � t'i'I , �` w 1 m 15.83 Z � , � I , Z � � 1 � � � o ' � \ -� � �� n I \ y� $ � o r � N 1 S oo�z4�54.E � s cn $ C r � � ,�.25 � o � Cj VINN rn , .� � $ �� oz , _ _ _ W _ _ _ ; .�_ 1 _ _ _t _ . � y � , 3 � I � � � �� , � N I ' � � � � I. � 0 1 1 Z I � , � I , � 0 c� � w v � N 1 � Z 1 � I U ` � ` ❑ � I I �1 w ` N 1.50 � _... m � � � � � \ � 1 I � 1 � 1` g � I I + `� i i 1 �2s.00 I I 1' � I „Lb.65,Z�N _ ` M 00'0� — — —-� — � /_ �, �: I ��"� I 3.00 . ...._� ....._......__....,_e...t.., '............ ,...-- _� N ?�: ��_ ;�. N 00°14'19"W 234.95 �� 1 pBAy r.�� i � �3•� ��s 1 "m 33 I 33 ` 1 ` I 1 � I I I I ` � i I ` — —— '—— _"— —— -- '—— —— —— —- � , . � 1 � rn � � r � �1 _ � r Zv — e � 1 � 1 � Z cn w � n o D � � r m ... _ °' ,� r z � �� m rn � m � � � r�" r � � � , �' � "�` � Z � � � � � REVI �o ESIGNE Iherebytertdytbatthissurvey,plan,otreport g"1714 GRONBERG & ASSOCIATES INC. DATE BY REMARKS was preparod by me or under my dired supervision andlhetlamadutyLicensedLandSurveyorunder t'30' CIVILENGINEERS,LANDSURVEYORS,L.ANDPLANNERS Ihe iaws of the State of Minnesota � �a-+es 445 N.WILLOW DRIVE LONG LAKE,MN 55356 DATE MINN.LICENSENUMBER E rgNEETe PHONE: 952-473-4141 FAX: 952-473-4435 SE�-£Lb'ZS6�Xdd 6b6ti-£Lb-ZS6�3NOHd `� � tl38WON38N3011'NNIW 31VO 9S£SS NW`3Nt1'1'JNO� 3AI?Ja MOl'lIM'N S� eY�w� S?J3NNVld 4N1/l`S210J13A?Jf1S aNV"I`SZI33NI°JN3lIAl� .oE=..� 'etoseuu�y��oa�e�sev�los�xe�ey� ,�./N' `S31b�I�OSS`d � J2l38NObJ 31Y� �apun�o�teninspue'�pesua��qnpewe��ey�pua SN2iVW3L1 A8 31V4 4`3 w,8 uoiswedns penp Rw�apun�o ew!.q pa�ede�d saw yode�io'ueld'deNnssiy�3e41N!Ne�Rqe�ey� 3N�JIS3 SN t In3 Z O 0 N ZU � W O W Zzao Z >w a W ��wz �o o �- ZQ A � Z OOaQ �i � U�� Z o Q �aaa J M � �� Z aaa � � �� wwww � o ►-F--F-H � � 0000 ZZZZ W W W W �� Z � .. .. .. .. 1 W �" �� T �\ � � , � a �, O � -- ' -- -- -- -- � -- --L-- C� � ' � __ �� '' � J � \ \ � � , ` `� 1 , W � _� / \I �� \ `�� 11�� 1, �. I EE �� I �—� i � ��\�\1�� \ � � �� ' m � � .�� , —, . , ....o. 6.,�.�.�..� � � ....�� ,,� _ . .. .., __ c� 9A2— / —��—_— `_-- 1\ /�' , I . /_ _ —_ ., � F-- B 1 � �� 11 , N � �� : — E-- 10.00 11 ` � 1 2 5 4 1 � I � � �� 1 I � � T� � \ �� 11��,� � �, 1 S e s e o e � � m \ „� � , I �� _ o o�S�� 1I �.\,1\�1 � � �� I�� i �, � I I \ 1\ 1 �l � � I I g — J I`� � �111 I�� ` � � � �� 11�� , ,�� 1 I I � i �.� � �i � �`�� 1 ', �i1jll � �' 1, I � � � 1� j�� I�1�� 11`I � `, � � i \��`��/ � 1 �,� III I� � � � `, I � ��_.. . � c� � �I �� 11 � �� z N I 11��11 � � ' � I � wm �� II 1 � � � �� a� � � �� ----__ 8- , � I II 11 �, � �� a '�. — L� � $ 1 ' I IIIII , 1 2 Z� _....__`_--- �� ,.,. 11�`_._11..._. ._.._- � _._... .._ _ ..._ ... � . .__. . _ .___. _... .._ .. .. . ... ......... �� i � �, Zo 00 1 I ��I 1 �1� ,e� ` I �� g �I� �.�,�z�� 1'� � I / � � $ I � 11 ' ._ :I� 1 S � � ; i � o w � �� , I � I�j��l� � , I ti � � � � �, ,� �� I � � i1 � � � � ��—fl-�----� � 1 I � I i � y `, ` � II � 1 I � " � QW � E8'9L � l IIII 1 o Y �, o� a' � � °� $' ,---'� ` ,-I 111 � � I � d d� .� __ � � �l , 2 , �� I � � �� f � Z� ►�11 � � �-- I11�� 1 � �, �` � `1 �I 11��1 \ � , � _�_ . . . I oo ez a " 00'9L � �'� ' n� � �� ... . J� � I ��I�I' \ � ��= o � �� W 1 I � . g � ........ � m s.o o L � 1� � � �� I ` W^ ��6 1I3 p�l l l�1 I � � � �\, ` �..a �� '� II� �� I � EE�� a � N � E o � . oo�e� � , SE� S� r �� ►� ►''` 1 << o I � , < «��9 � � ��►I � \ �N N �i � E'06 � �.� I \ I O� � N � L' . . S�� . 9�� I I r � ��I I i I 1 ` I B' � � 9 �� I � �� s � � A N �' � �� I I � I � r 3`J 1S a31dMWaOlS � � �� g � 11 aNf10?J°J213oNf1 03SOdOa � I I I j�I I z I I I M ery � �E, F.E II � �� L —— \ —__ dld I� � I I I e.� —'� — O ¢ y��M9S�M O S Q3 d Ld: I . ____ � �%�'9�� I� � I - - J $ €' • a OO�zeZ 3.4�.YZ 00 S —�— �� d� � +A I i I O m aa ( o�. / �—�, � � ' J �O'��'�i��I I � I� 1 fn�a✓ � I � \ � � — , I 1 �ll�� I .-_- i I � �� ' ,�� I , 1 \ � .\j �1 ;1/�i'N � I i , � ( � � // / °��' /% I � ` ' i I i�l��/ ; I � �ill% ��i ��b _� o� �� S�yI LL�{i70•Atl� L1►bb-£Lti-Z96�3NOHd 6�3M� N38Wl1N3SN3�Il'NNIW 31V0 3N�3H 99£S� NIN`3>It/l�JI�iO°1 3AR10 AAO�IIM'N S1� ev�-r�He >213NWV'id aNfl'I`S210J13/i21f1SaNV'1'52133NILJN3l1�l�OJ .oe=.L 'e�osewiwJoelBlSey��osme�at� a •�./�' '��V I�JV��Y � ��OJ *e �epun�oRenrnSP�e"IPesuwi�R�npewelle4lPue S)iiiVW3?J A8 31V4 p`_��8 uo�s�niadns penp Nu�epun�o ew 6q pe�ede�d sern 31w uode��o'ue�d'/eninss�y11ey1�1!Ve�RQe�ay� 3N�JIS3 �� O N r Z W Q i W LL J o Z � �' � w Q J � ¢ O U � � M � J —' _ J o � H- � Z �. � 1 W CL �� oa ' � z �, O �� __ �_ _- - -- -- -- -- --�--- C' � ' -- - �, W � , � � a � ' I ss es I �,� ` o m �£�� m J 96'4EZ M.6L,4Le00 N sb��<�� _� .• . _.._.�........._.....!_........ ,...,.._...._.._._.._.........� - 8 'I ��- 1 I -- -- �, ��" � i 1 �� 'T's'; 10.0� ,41�W ga a;��: �� '. N12'S� � W > � I HLL IW � HS 1 �'a3 �o `a ��d$ �§ � I x� $� 1 �� oo�sz� ` �aa 1 I I � g ` , � � rn I � I _ .. � 1 N ` Y�I N ` U� sKK ��y tV (� gal 05.� m � � o ` I � ..I....�arb ; 1 T � 2 � � � �I I � ` � m '^ � 1 I � � ...� � V � Q °' .... $ I Z ` � 1 I � 0 I O in Bm � 25• O � � � �� -..� N�I = 5 1 � ` �y� �� a_ m .................._....----...................................... ........ ............................ ... . . .. -�. ' .......... .......... .... ._.........._.._.. - ........ .... ....." "NU1V1 � �� Q Zo.00 � , I � � � g �l z.°vs,vz,00 s � ` � � I � � -' ;� ° z � a � � ; o , c� , > � �� . � Io � � s , �W I es�s� ` 1 W �Q I�� . � r g' ` r ` I � $ZI I �a� � ~ � � ..1 � � � � Z '� O � � OG �, �...:�. . . . oo�eZ r �� oo�a� , ��m � , � ' Z�� w ` v��a_ rl g .... I N I S � v � `� I � u g 06°13'50"E `� v � w � � � .�..{ � � � � o � $�� • o zz y £E'O6 &� � � I � � � 4� z 00'9L � � o �� n o�I �' � v�i, �i, � N I of oa � .t � � O ' C� O < '��' I � LL'L9 0 o•Q' I < w p O �p I �N N �db � �S I 1oTd ; I p a, � � '� �, ` � M I � R 3`J 1S?l31VMWaOlS o� n�� o`Do g 4Nf1021�Ja3aNf143SOdOild � �p � n � & � se. I££ I � �� —— — —— — — �,�d�,�� I � a3sodoaa a3sodoad � � -' -••`9t €' '� 00'Z8Z 3��YS,YZ,00 S �sS��• I ..._ R �Qg�' �,�op`�o�m�--� 3S '�'� i O Omn10. N�a �� Z I� > �I I I I � I� � ��--� i ' � i � . �� " a �a� a � m ' I � I I I I I � V�N � I , ``Q`�,� �� 0 a ��S94s S 00°24'54"E 282.00'� - ,� � �•..._ s,.• 248.96 � � 3� '� .... '•, . . . . . . N. . : . . . . . . . _—, O A -- -- -- - - A 33 �33 n � ti m °' I � �I� � w ap' � I � � N (p p) I e v I � N� � ( W ll �?� � A 6�.�7 a I W � N �j� r .... � � � 1� � ? I ' Na ........ 90.33 78.00 I w n�i� w � � �..�... q o � � $ r � - , � I tt I 3.05,£to 90'G &m ` ... � �y I � . . . � � �.... � � . . . 1 � � 28.�0 �8.00 ', Y'... � 7� � � '�� O , G Z � � � r � 2 � � � � � v , � w � I � m � m , ` ` 15.83 � I � I � � � � �- ' � � , � o � �, _. < 1 - y � 1 -� � . ....� � I , �,�, � o r 1 S 0��24�54"E ` g � � I r � 10.25 � m � T I , � � �� 1�� 00'oZ. . I R d m _..�.._................_.._..__ __......_...._.............._. ... ...__. . .. ..._._.._........_..._._...............-- ........ . _ .................... . . ...... ..._�.... ...- �r I ` O ` � ` I ..'� y r � � � I � O � pp�SZ, � � • � 1 � � I .. w � , v ` � 1 ti .,...I. N I � � Z � I N 1 � 1 ti . I � � 11 W 1 i,•Wi 1.50 I ...�. � . m � � I I � � 1 ` � 1 � I o I I , o `� I 1 125.00 I i � I `\ I I .LV.�SaZ�N 1 M 00'0� __ —'�'. —— �, �. I I � �- 1 � ;' : _.. -�� $ � � 3.00 ...................._.--�-�_...........................t...• '. _�- 2 ; N 00°14'79"W 234.95 � ��'�49 r m m � � �8�3+� m&� 1 �"� 33 i 33 � 1 I I 1 � I I I I ` I � I ' — —— —— —— —— —— —— —— —— � �� rn . r � � G� � o � Z � r _ � � � � rn = oT � � � Z � � s� �1 . r F $c �� Z �i (/) W � � A� Oy (IO ZOy /\ � - D � � � �� y �� C � a �g �C � ��y m o Z '�- ?D 2 O � � p Cx � � � g o� � � N� Z � --i r � � y �°_ �6' $ $$ "L � m � A c � � � ¢ y '"� � �c m �r'c o� o � " �Ti /'� g � � � � P2 � Vd � O � � �p. � m � y � � F � �� °z � � N z W 8 O 9 0 S 6i � � v � ESIGNE Ihereb certi thatthissurve, lan,orre ort �E GRONBERG & ASSOCI�4TESy �1�161. R V�`S� N was prepare by me or under my dired supenision 6-17 74 DATE BY REMARKS and that I am a duly Llcensed Land Surveyor under tha�awsofthestateotrot�nnesota. �''30' CIVIL ENGlNEERS,LAND�URd'EY9RS,I.AND PIANPdER� 74-748 445 N.WILLOW DRI1/E 6�(?�[G LA�KE,M!V 55356 OATE MINN.UCENSENUMBER g�es PHONE:952-473-4141 FAX:9S2-473-44�5 S£i�-£LtrZS6�X'dd Lti4�-£lti-ZS6�3NOHd "'� 's"'"' �'�"'�"'•• ""�`"•�' 9S£SS NW`3H1/l JNOI 3ARIU iNO�IIM'N Si*V 661-4t 'woswui�y yo aiwS W1 W�I aR S�J3NNV'Id ONVI'S2lOA3A21f1S�NV'1'S2133NI�JN3 ll/U� ,os=.� pp�p�s.p��p�Nq��y�p¢i,u�¢��¢yG p� i '° uo�ClNodna F�+!0 6w�aP�+��o aw�(Q P�edaQ sav� S71W W3?J A8 31V0 '�NI S�1�11�OSSH � J2i�8N0?!J `��-� �p��w��.��,�,��,�� 3N'JIS3 sr�oisin�a � o � �� g � �Q��, �E. Nm �� ic ^ ' r._ � � 3�d$gt'�, �� N a. p � N � �� a� �� $�� s � U } � � � � �,,�s'�5��'6 � g�g�� Z �� $ W � � 0 o j �; ��`� �. ��sSZ �� a$� �� c $'S$� �.- '�� . { �� o � � � ,� �� °+p � E� r�. � � m � �� Z. ( i��$ii�ai� } 'b«c��_� � Z g 3 '� i.v � 2 i. � � R YN � oo��s E�.Z � y I .� �� 'a N a W Z w �� q��$��z � ��a�� " a � =R � � �' T O� � �� I N � J J v� ,� � I o� �c�: �� € .��$ �� ._�� $ � �R � � � � o z ; �� 8��Z��'� �ss� � �� I � � �$. � � �` � � a � �Y9i� 's S�S��u A � 3' : o, r � / Z � g�'�� 4�p �� p��g o�� g�$� i '� � �N � � W � W }� V� p� F C �� 'q.�C � �� p $ � N � J J •4.=a 3La��o� �1- � E$�' r 'c w � .F� N I N �6 � � �� N � O I � 'd' V O U I � �� t9'�3w32�� X�,��@�� "5� .�° �f�a�c ' ° 1 � � � m� a < Z _ � y. � ��$ `�g.R2 � '� � p}� Z � � .� e— Z � . O t6.� fr�3r�gN4,� �,�� S 10w= �i� '.�.� � .8�3� ,�, � a a �N ° TV o U � W � a � �$ � �� g��'�-g� � 3�� §�� a � g � g vZ s `A' 0 � Z 7b o ��E�� s�� a�oa�� ffi � v �� U ` ii Z W� � $ c .w �� Q � W Z � � �� -a �s� ��z�g�z q�cS �°'T3 � �� a �a < w� � � _ � $� � z�� v � r��rgW�o e; �� W� � �,a � �i .. � �' �' E �p' O WT p �- E��a �.��.Ep .� � CE ��.c .3 .� .� $�>3� a -i� O O .�� 2 � � � .i � 4 �� U w.��+�...S R �u�i C>�S� 2 B�� 4 �� 1- � N.1p � � • Z Y Q � . �___�.R_T'_�_� Z� ,� � _— 7� ' .F� __—_ ~� ' �d� �_�__ _—_______�_______—__—__— �`. � ....."'.... .......�;-�-� m �: � S00°03'47"E 421.80 f�^z��! �W ; �� ,�I b--- i'1 �m :' i `�ti I i 1 -��k'�.��. Sk ZN � Z,; `• `��R - �� J� �- �' yQ3 Q �� ~ � Wf/) 1- U _ a2 .' W Z tWn � y W'L [i � ` 'Q JO i .. I � . 1 a� � �`�'+ �` � �6 `A':' B9Z M.6t.4t.00� ,�',�o "g 3 :_�::�:;:.�:..,.:;._..._.................:. : a I W ,`'• ��a, � . �.I. �„ , . . e�•asx i��:s�;tir:oo.. o .`�'','. O w¢- `8 : �.. se � qb'19'W�� J�(�;>. . + . ; . N 00'f4'19'W 10�5 I . N tY �."•... ,\ .....:�. .- t aO(A� 1 I .....:f�5� � tA11.8L.4t.00 ......- $ ,11. ��,� ,-.. . `�'C9Z',:B��il':6G.5 '--.., � �. . . .,; �a 99'E9 M o!• � •- Z Z p�.'�'...� � i �' � \1 �� w � I 1� W W� f,1 �11 F O Y�. N � s� �,1 \1,` �,o I �� I m i °W ` ��K � �N 1 '11Z I �s � 11, � 5� �1 _ , i '• - �� "��`,`� —�--'+E'6ll ---- -- � -----i`�`---------------------- _� _�� _ �_T� __ T •• --�— � ; zi1 ', " OS'Z8S M.6l�Y1.00.N f � I•�1 4 � I I � � I 1 m� \ , i 5t � I � i � 1 �., �'�1 � �' �. � I - � E£ � EE 56'bEZ M«6l,bLo00 N � � ,,11'W��"-' � � ' �••.,., r�oo�ss �,; ; ss��oz: --..�= a� %?�---� 1,� � I ' I 1��25147"�.� � �� r pl I � � ; � �I I I W^ � ' �� I � ;Y; Z� W, '1 ; �� ' � � �': �.- � a� � oi 4 1 U o I E.Q'it v~i� J F wy 1 ` w I � I ; Q W U r Z.r� � �1 A JN �I �Z I . 2 (� Q? J tT)Q �► `' � Q W �vi�g te �� 0�� i �N �� u�T � � M �� I m I �: .�� ¢ N ¢Z , v�iv�i I �a Q�n � � N. .j3 R' M i�5<. � � � I O� V N � ; >� �o� ;� �� o i '� y � I �J I�� I � � a r � 3 w i ; wz ` � � : . z� Z i Z I'.� b>I : E JO :''� `, 16U.00............................'��, � I W� ! ( _� J� � , Q t ..t-... 1 N �= I�� I : :';�;� i � � � � �� a� Z� : = '• .../..:.r..!�::.-..... . s oo.�za�sa^E � !i ................................ ................. y ............... . . . ... . � ' Y > ' j � ��':7,� ��138b) b2� 10.2 ................... � , I �v I ; N .7�b. �.�:::.:.: ...... � '4L4 3.6l�YLe00S ....... ................................................................................ ................_.... ..... ;`"'• � d T. � , r...................... : ......-Q i i Z � `• ' �� W � � " �� , � � ' � � `� I� I �}�� i o _ ��....., ..... � �..I� I � 3� . ,...,�?.:p0:::..... � � .._.......� t� = 1�...... ,. i . .................. • � .......;... , I I � `^� N�� Z � i o�...........- UW�w Y N t N I I I'.........,t� ' ' .Y . t 1 <W Y ` �(y O , . � m � r ,,/ I � wiv � N �Ia ��Q,� c7 N 1i w � .............:.............. z d� .... � 11 ��n w�l.s r°�i � r� -J in \ 'I�j �U e va �+ 7i� s I ri m �� W z� 9.� N OB'13'5D'W.I`a ¢W Q�i t �� I �u .......... � � :r Sc5 U� „ .......�.00 J O� N N � . I J I J �N �O � r ��ZO� � �� . N � I I o I� ge a� s�...W........ I� 'N� i r I . � I J �` am ma¢� � N O � • . I N IYv �N $ =nm 't. I� v�nv W i� ' _....--N�-- --�-- - -- j, o � . �m Im rt I � __.a`,'......_...._.............._........___...._...._...-- -..._...__... .�e�..........;-' �- - ---- -..._...---.._..__.._;._..... .. ,..._.................I_..._..'_"_.._._._..._....._.._. .�_......._.....,.�..N_..._.....""'._.... W�. . � Z W w. '._ �+�""_"'"""...._....._..._........._.__..._......__._............_......._._._..__.._...._....._._.j.._ O . .........................__......_....�A 1 . � c� � ZLL �9! � . ;,I � 'U :,!n I :=�- I . �p �. yQ ,:'�� ....... I � IW �O 9d2��) � � ZDa ��......� 0 � � ' � ' ....-..-.. ._.....,, ...............„........................................................... ..................... `� I`r i 96'8bZ g'S'°•�::::�•"........ss _.... := W i i � vo ee � -+-�- .............. `' � ,_1..... ..: :' �,..._. __........_..::. 6E'£OZ '--'r�� i . �— , :. 00'Z8l � .._._._._.� ' '-••-- 6£'S84 M.t'S.4Z.00 N I i � 1, � 00 Z � I I ,' � _ � ° ' � i I I^ W 33 � sa �� °� � 1� � ¢ N � �S� �� i � o U I W c� Z N � � �n J f I N� °� ( � �3 `° I N ` /� N ! 1 � C� I � M.4S.tiZ.00�N � / `----^�'� �-------------------1-------------- ----------------------------- � W < a � • .� ( _ GOLDEN VILLAS I I 9130 AND 92]0 OLSON MEM00.1A1 HIGHWAY I . ________�__.____—___________� ___�__�____—___�__�___� . ____'_—_____ . . . � ____'_______ .. - � � __� ' .. ... � I � ' � � � II elness swenson grah�n ar�hltects � � � 50o washington avenu. south I I minnea0olis minnesotae5<<15 p. 6 1 3 . 3 3 9 . S 5 0 9 I W.�Nl ] . 3 3 9c h.3 o m ' .e s g a I • � . - I IFe�<bV�eV�mLiha�tF�xdo�umentw�s r�tlE und<emvdlre�t�upervl*ion � . . - � �ed�F��I am�duV�Il�.nxetl�r�M1lteet � � vn<ertM1el�wv of�Fe st+�e olMlnneso�+ I �-�---� I 519^ature . '_'J_____'__'_'_'_'_'_'_'__'_'___'_'_ ; I _ � � e __ _ � .. - � ' ,rn�a o,.��. H,m. � � . _ __ _._� � � � i i � � � � , I � _._ ._. i � 27 ' I � �m.—�—' o.�. i i � � I.. I I I I❑ I� �� I❑ �o i 0 p _ I �O� O� � 1..., o I � � o _ 1 � G,`, I - � Up to Shaet Level I �Q �J I ♦z,3sa � ` � -—- sv — � ��-` � o ° i � GO I ❑ ❑ i� � �� WatedElec � 1 � � � ❑ � i� i� ' S8 �I � I I --- I � � i i I � ' ' ' I � I � _ � ' ' i' I PRELIMINARY � B � I I I� �s II �� I � � � BUILDING PLANS � I � � � � ° � � � I� �� ❑ � ONIGINAI I55UE: v�lxsli� � � �❑ � � � ' ___ � Q ' AEVISIONS � I — I No. Des�rip[lan �a[e 112 Spaces P1 I � � -- I I � I ❑ �o �o �° �° �� ,l❑ �I Mua, I p i0 i� �� I 33 I I I I � � � .. � Mech I II � � i i i il I I .-� I ._..._ _ . .._ � ( � � � I I � 1 ' � I � '' � ProjectNumber aoiecru u ea � ��' �^-� o Aw.�.�r Cxh rEoe�r I �- ' � � I � � � �, �E.o�.x ' ---.--' , �--------------------- ' i I i � � i�, � � ' ' 1 ��I � �� ,/' � '/'� ' I �—" GOLDEN VILLAS i I_ �� ' 'I' _ L�_—_._--_—_—__------ —��_ ��—� LEVEL P1 PARKING PLAN - A1 .0 " 1 BP-P1 � �+.o +n s•.r-0• �.�._---- -- _____----- -- -- � GOLDEN VILLAS i -��, - ' � 9130 ANO 9210 OLSON MEMORIAI MIGHWAV Building Setback Llne Monument Sign -------------- I --------------- 2Ca/Share------ --- -------------- -------- -GoMenValieYRoa� Spaces -—--—-- � ' - I I � _�_ ----------- —I --------------- ----------------- � � _ ------ � .i� ----- ----------------- � --- ------ ------------------ ------------ � I �, ----- .� _______ � � —_ � ess swenson 9raham c <ects � �\�/�J�///��\!��/�/ � 18 I 50o washington avenu south I `�LLY � I I 1 I m i neaPo�lls minnesotac 55115 I � p, 6 1 2 • 3 3 9 . 5 Sc0 9 I J I I W, v� 2 . 3 3 9 . 5 j o m i � Drop Ott I 1 �x.,mv.. : a a r c n . ��V�hac MI.ea�ument w.v II I� I .�a�e.e ih,m.a�iv u.�.a.,�nn.ao.rvi.�o. � � ' I ��e.,m.i,.,.or m.s.,�,o�Mm..:o�. � � I Outdoor � � _... � � q ,�,. -- . B{ke i --r— , i Parking I � Lobb _._ � I w.e a..��.a H,m. I Y 1 1 I _ — --- —1 �—r m.. ( � m Bldg Maintenance �< I I � ' � �O�` o� � � � BR+ �� R� _ I � � 1 BR+ 1 BR+ 1 BR♦ �N± �$R.'.. � � � � �` . � L7I�f 9l3 Sf � !12 Sf 769 SF � � � I — �' � ❑ B72 SF � 873 SF B7]SF 874 SF G �18 I a� Scooter/ 8 D o w n t o P i P arki n g � I ` �� Moped �, I � � Parking I � Leasing — � � O I � � J ' G � � `� � o � � � i Trash � O � � � Mech Elec Rm I n —f— I � � � Reycle ��'� I � � � 3,I10 Sf J � � � Move In � PRELIMINARY i i I �� _i __ _i _ _ _ i _ _i _ i � � :_: i I BUILDING PLANS I I I I _ � ze � � � � I I I I� I ' 00.1GINAL ISSUE: orl�sit� 1 � � ❑ '� ' � ' I � I �Q I� � � I REVISIONS f � � b ❑ f} � � � � � No. DescrlD��^ Date � 1 ' � � � i ]8,706 ' I � I Sf � � � f � I � � i a �° '° '� � � I I I p i❑ i� i i Pod � I I I I 1 � 26 Above I I i i � ,,J � � � � � I I , � ' i i I _,_ - � , � '_' � ' i i � � � � � � I . I I ❑ PoolEquiP ❑❑ '�� 'I' '' ''' � ProJ°N�ui+ee�mber I Resident _,, I .on�* I I BikePatking ,�_—' I Auchor Chec�keyr I i � 5 �" _ � ',.--� I ' ��'�''l'��—� Kno�.�r E e e � I —�' I I_ , _—. __�� I _— �� II —'�� /' � �' .i I � ,,__— '�-- I I 8 -- 'I/'I_, .— ___�� I I _, _�_ �� II -- _� —'—_ �� -----� � �� I GOLDEN VILLAS � __'_�_—__—'___ L �' � J�� L__'__— I . - I �� ,�� / � _� � _� ��I �_____ _________———""'———� ��! . � FIRST LEVEL PLAN �' f! Al . 1 = t LEVEL 1 A1.7 1/18'.7'-0' GOLDEN VILLAS 9130 AN�9120 OLSON MEMORIAL HIGHWAY I I ——___—� — _ ' . _—__ ___——_—_ .__ ______— � � _ __ I � � � II elness sWensen qraham��chltects � I 500 washington av so�th � I I minneapo�ll� m��eto[a Sc415 I p, 5 7 7 . 3 3 9 . 5 5 0 8 �,� 1 2 . 3 3 9 . 5 3 o m w. z y a c h . I � � � ix.,.ev�aiwm.ivni,ao��m.��... Ii .�e m.�i�e.m.a�n ee.�.a.,.nn.ae..�i.m� - � � ,,.e.,�x.i>w.or�x.sa�.=r ui��.�oe. iSBR I rvn u��v�innawm � 1,099 SF � _; 0 1f I �p��SF I i B0. 1 BR �R I tiaense a ��cove �� l�gq 1,0]1 SL 75]SF 1.16E SF �O` O` ' �"q �� 76135F 515 SF 7�8 Sf 718 Sf i t ` I �ae sr 718 SF �es sF I � � '\� a �G � 1 BR � _ � � g'�Q� I � - ' 748 SF � I SYOf 1 R O N I �O _� �8R 916 SF I �� 7tLB�5f �A 1.I Oa0 5F 71B SF 718 5F � AI e Tf 1.1�1 Sf ]4B SF 7�6 Sf � . 615 SF � 74'0 SF ,..� � I ' i PRELIMINARY i i BUILD�NG PLANS � 1 BR f tnezs I ORIGINAL ISSUE: o�i�s�� 748 SF 1.099 SF Z qp I 0.EVISIONS � No. DescrlPtian Oa[e I �g 1,1195F I Ameni�yTerrace i,oe�sr I I I I i ea ( iae sF I I 1 P� I I I I _ � 1 ri'�y a.m_ —' 2ndExit � � . irom Pod Deck � 1,183 sF Pro}ectuNumber I * I. � � / �oJcc.ex we� � �-��' `,.1,oB75F , �^` I �Auchovr CHhefke� l f � � ♦ � � .� . ,. . J� �� ' ...w II_/�� KE,ou� � __. _..__ --- . / �� I ��' I � ' I � ' ''_ � � � '� � � �� , _/ GOLDEN VILLAS I _ _- "� _ , __- - -_ , � _ _ - - - --- -- _ __ _ _ ---.. _ - - _ - - _ _ �' ''� LEVELTWO PLAN � A 1 . 2 ^ � LEVEL2 "�__..-_ ___------------___---- n�a v�s•.r-c, GOLDEN VILLAS 9130 AND 9220 OLSON MEMORIAL HIGHWAY �� .�.�� ' � I ' � � I ' � I elness swenson qraham archltects � ' S00 washington av ou[h I � minneapolla minneso[ac55415 I I p, 6 1 3<. 3 3 9 • 5 SCO 8 W. 6 1 3 . 3 3 9 . 5 3 0� W W. s 9 a !c h. II 1oF<r.�r.eLey1N�,o��n is e e��m en�wa � � I ,.amai.m.amv�..•�a,,.`niad[rv�•�o^ I � I S9der`u�[l+wsolth<s�ateolMinn�zo�a � �g I � 1,099 SF � � yv or rrin ame �ed r. � �g ' ua— o,�� 1,0]3 SF j�6 I � �� —� ( N 1 R 1 BR �fi �g �0. 1,1 BB SF ` I 1 BR 1 BR �_ ��o��sr �s�sF �O Q` � I �� 749 Sf 71B SF 763 SF 763 SF fi15�F 718 Sf 748 Si I ' ` ' � � i �0.� Q.JG� ' 7{8 Si — � �'\ I $SOf 7 9 R 0 N .. ( � ' q 1 90. j$R 9�B SF I Go plcave 1 B �R 1�R 1 B �"g 71B SF 1,1�0 Sf 719 SF ' I A� T� 615 SF 7/8 SF 748 SF 748 SF 719 SF . � 645 SF t � �,�F � � � PRELIMINARY � � � i BUILDING PLANS 1 BR 1'�'� I ORIGINAL ISSUE: o'/Ixsit� ' 74B SF »�SF � � 1 BR REVISIONS ( � �R 1,1195F I � No. Descrlption Oate ' Ameniry Tertace Below i,o e�sF ( � 1 BR 1 BR I I748 SF ]18 SF ' � � � I ,.., ' � I � � I � l BR 1,193 Si � i,oe7 SF P�rofec[uNFtmber J .a,E�,��e ( �� I�� o.wx err C�h�co e� � I � � ''' Ko ri,� �' /' I / I �� 'I ' i �� I �� ( �—��__'_J��'_J'I` GOIDEN VILLAS I ��' � _� �----------'�-----"—"" I �� __�_' �/� s LEVEL 3-5 PLAN - A1 . 3 � � BP-03 A1.3 1N6'=1'-0' �_ _� GOLDEN VILLAS � 9130 ANO 9220 OLSON MEMORIAL HIGHWAY ��__�� ___��_��_�__ _�� _�_ _��_�— � _�__�_— ' �__��— I � � � � � II e�ness swenson graham archlt�ns ' � 500 waahington avenu south minneapollf minnesotac55415 ( I p. 6 7 3e. 3 3 9 . 5 :CO 0 w w w 2 • 3 3 9 c h.3 o M , s g a � � �e.r.eYc�rnh�ti.��nisao�um.ncwss II n n..a ev m.o,�.e.,mr �.��,�c.,�+o. ' . ' ..e�n.�i.m.aupna�:.ev�nrt.a 1 ' uneer�x�Iawa ol in.z�aie o�M�nn<zou II s9 [u« I . �g � iYPt e�VrinteE Name � . 1.099 SF I 2 B0. ___ I1,073 SF 2 BR 1 BR 3� I ii�e'-i oa�e I Lg �R' �R �� 7�8 SF 7�8 SF . 1,071 SF ]57 SF 1,1 BB SF I �O� O� � ` I 74B SF 74B SF ]63 SF 763 SF 645 S� I � t G� 0 _ i o � , � � , � ��Q� ' ]48 SF � I � $lOf 1 9R N ' � � � 1 Bk 1 B0. 'a � i ioo sF »esr �as sF 948 Si I ( Go � qicove Tf 6}5 Sf �7�8 Sf 748 SF 748 SF 718 SF � i ��X�� I ' I s�s sv L� . Kltchenette I 1 BR i 7405F .., I BULDINGNPLANS I 1 BR �/ I pRIGINAL ISSUE: o�l�si�� 1 HR � 748 SF �4�SF 6th Floa � REVISIONS I �—Outdoa � r+o. o..uiauoo o�c� 1 BR i- Torrace I1,01 D SF / I � k/ � � 1 BR 1 BR I ]I B SF 749 SF I � � � � � I ..., l _�--- I � � � 2 BR I 2 BR i,ie3 sv /_ II P o�cc*�Nui+eeamber 1,087 SF J I _—� �, o..wx e. C�h rEo avr � ��, , I — ( _ ��' re..�,,H i � ��— i' I �— I �� '' I �'� � �� '�/' GOLDEN VILLAS I ''/ Y��I'I `�� '� � ��' f�' �_'_______�-___.----- '�� ,,-� LEVEL SIX PLAN l� - A1 .4 " i BP-O6 A1.t i/76'.1:0' ' — G k�y (,/J 'r'f I':i, lPi�i�'•::�, �r ,,a ;j. �� v �+�. �'�� Planning Department 763-593-8095/763-593-8109(fax) �� .�'�. =�u��-e�"� �. �.�'-�� '�.'��.�� ='�' :� ;�::�� W�'�.:�-��;;_" �.�" .� :: �f °� :�� ; Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting September 16, 2014 Agenda Item 4. D. Public Hearing- Revision to Preliminary Plat- Kate's Woods - 221 Sunnyridge Lane- David Knaeble, Applicant Prepared By Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager Summary The Applicant received approval of the Preliminary Plat for a minor subdivision at this address from the City Council at their July 15 meeting. Prior to the submission of a Final Plat for approval, the zoning requirements governing lot width as they relate to subdivisions were modified by the City Council and became effective. The Applicant feels that the changes made to the zoning code now allow for a better design of the two new lots and is seeking approval to revise the Preliminary Plat in accordance with the new requirements. The ability of the Preliminary Plat to be adjusted as desired hinges on an interpretation of the interior lot line and if it should be considered a side lot line or a rear lot line for Lot 1. This determination is important since a rear yard setback violation would be created under one of the scenarios. If this line is considered a side lot line for Lot 1, the side yard setback would be 15 feet and the existing home would be in conformance with the zoning requirements for the R-1 district. If this line is considered a rear lot line for Lot 1, as it was in the approved Preliminary Plat,the rear yard setback should be a constant value of 20%of the lot depth along the entire line. In this situation, the garage of the existing home would violate the rear yard setback of 21.5 feet by 6.5 feet as the structure is 15 feet from the lot line. At the August 25, 2014, Planning Commission meeting, the Commission voted 3-1 to recommend interpreting the interior lot line as a rear lot line for Lot 1 and therefore not to modify the Preliminary Plat as desired by the Applicant. Attachments � Location Map (1 page) � Planning Commission Minutes dated August 25, 2014 (3 pages) • Memo to the Planning Commission dated August 25, 2014 (3 pages) • Memo from City Engineer Jeff Oliver dated March 17, 2014 (2 pages) • Preliminary Plat Approved by City Council on July 15, 2014 (1 page) • Proposed Preliminary Plat handed out at the August 25, 2014, Planning Commission Meeting (1 page) • Site Plans dated February 17, 2014, and revised August 1, 2014 (4 pages) Recommended Action If the City Council finds that the lot line in question is a rear lot line, Staff recommends a motion to deny the revised Preliminary Plat for Kate's Woods, 221 Sunnyridge Lane. If the City Council finds that the lot line in question is a side lot line, Staff recommends a motion to approve the revised Preliminary Plat for Kate's Woods, 221 Sunnyridge Lane, subject to the following conditions: 1. The City Attorney will determine if a title review is necessary prior to approval of the final plat. 2. A park dedication fee of$2,930 shall be paid before final plat approval. 3. The City Engineer's memorandum, dated March 17, 2014, shall become part of this approval. 4. All applicable City permits shall be obtained prior to the development of the new lots. 400 � ; � ,, _-..,.:.,. .i,_� 315 �4 ` 32 5��' � 49p9 4309� S BeveilyAva ��* ��fiy.� �s�: ! ��e �.�' .. 3YQ"" h. «: � 320 3+i4» �"'�^c,g� O $221 A215 4'lOS � �11� � —� 316 !� a-�' � . A127yt274717 375 y � 321 t �"'°y;v 't �. ��, a„ 31 G�' 311 .�> ✓ r 'C ,z, "i x � � N.� . , ��5.• g,r;_ :i �� . .,. Q � � � •��A•E $g#�" �'k; £x:.«.: �;,,�i' ` Y*3S. �g°,e^�.. �r .? � 312 307 .^+`�, �308 309 "��- S �, ��r' aot' sao a2is� yzt2 atao� �t2a a�tx � so ams m ��` � ; �.� aas aoo as�o zas Subject Property: ` 235 Poplat Ur z� � 221 Sunnyridge Ln 4215` � 227 4125 ,� 235 , 234 3901 222 ?�219 ,+� 22 0 4�"'�� 221 � �•�` 200 _ �275 �;" 220� 22f� 209 211 `'`-., �� Z �;� �� ,r� � . s��219 � �� 2U7 r 214�" ,. 16&� � ��.,.�^�;�` � � � �212�g: � � `'�" �, :� 20U � 727 r,Rg �205 '�a�r� ^... 21a, �s;- "a� m,' 1� .''",� 12 4 1 G� �201 � ��ty �.�; � � '��Ct� ��` ��.'� 185 ' .«� ,>. �:� ,� � 204,� 20Fi c � 208 ��s ��2` / �as 2�n �,��i ��i.4, �.� y,9�:a ��.`=; .�,„.r" ��`�':t .. �: ......, `„3�? ' _ 101 .`: >140t �,. 720 �007 � � p� 100 ��= aQi24 _ ,.r 4QOA �-*„; 124 �" .. ��.v. »3, � �. #� .._ /- '� �\ �c�a �� d135 ,4020� 4Mo d008; 25 � �24 �� 1 f15 �«s�x�. �,�:��n ��_ � �� .,\ ,� _ �E106 ,�512 5� !y� �" �� . � �� R4anc�ke Cir . Q �20� r�n� � �.� 42 40 ll 4itY S; 401�5 , `4011 aC109 . ,.„,..a.. ,,.r,: �;?�". 17 .'.- .' ' � 40i$ � bs�'��-3"�. 427a �;'� �. Regular Meeting of the Golden Valley Planning Commission August 25, 2014 A gular meeting of the Planning Commi ion was held at the Golden Valley City Hall, Co cil Chambers, 7800 Golden Valley ad, Golden Valley, Minnesota, on Monday, Augus 5, 2014. Chair Kluchka called th ;meeting to order at 7 pm. Those prese �were Planning Commissi ers Blum, Kluchka, Seg�.lbau and Waldhauser. Als�skpresent was Planning anager Jason Zimmerman and Administrative Assistant Lisa Wittm ,. Commissioners aker and Cera u►rere absent. ; 1. Approval of Minute ' �. :. \` ;,., July 14, 2014, Regular Plann' C mmission Meeting July 28, 2014, Regular Planning mission Meeting .�� ; =.:,. ..� ,. �..� � Segelbaum referred to page 'h�1 of the Jul ' 14 minut�.and asked if it was him, or someone else, who que,�#��oned how the olden Valley'� ior Living proposal would affect Schuller's. He�a�ked that it be clari ed that a neighbor ed that question during the public hearin,,g�'Segelbaum referred t 'page 14 of the July 14 tes and noted that his first name,.r•father than his last, was us'd in the third paragraph. MOVE, y Segelbaum, seconded by Wal hauser and motion carried unanimously to app ve the July 14, 2014, and the July 2 ;, 2014, minutes with the above noted co rections. 2. Informal Public Hearing — Minor Subdivision Amendment— 221 Sunnyridge Lane — Kate's Woods — SU08-11 Applicant: David Knaeble Address: 221 Sunnyridge Lane Purpose: To revise the interior lot line of the recently approved Preliminary Plat. Zimmerman stated that the Preliminary Plat for the subdivision of 221 Sunnyridge Lane was approved by the City Council on July 15. At that same meeting, the lot width definition was amended, and is now in effect so the appticant is proposing a revision to the interior lot line to improve the shape of both of the lots. He explained that the applicant is proposing to call the interior lot line a side yard property line instead of a rear yard property line, and that staff would like the Planning Commission to interpret the language in the Zoning Code to help determine if it should be considered a side or rear lot line. He referred to a site plan of the property and noted that that there is a deck on the existing house that must be removed or modified in order to conform to the Zoning Code requirements. He stated that if the lot line is determined to be a rear lot line, staff recommends denial of the revision as the proposed subdivision would be in conflict with the requirements of the zoning district. If the lot line is Minutes of the Golden Vailey Planning Commission August 25, 2014 Page 2 determined to be a side lot line, staff recommends approval subject to the conditions recommended by Planning and Engineering. Waldhauser asked how the lot depth is calculated since that is what is used to determine the rear setback. Zimmerman stated that the rear yard setback requirement is 20% of the average lot depth. Kluchka asked why the interpretation issue couldn't be addressed during the final platting process. Zimmerman stated that the City Attorney thought that the proposed change was significant enough, and the Zoning Code is ambiguous enough, that it should be brought back to the Planning Commission for review. Kluchka questioned if the plan coufd be modified slightly to not be so extreme with either the side yard setback or rear yard setback location. Peter Knaeble, Applicant, handed out additional plans and stated that his intent is to rebuild or modify the existing deck to keep it out of the setback areas. He stated that the approved preliminary plat has really crooked property lines, and he ciearly heard from the Planning Commission and the City Council that they would like that line to be straightened out. He stated that the only practical way to do this subdivision without a variance is to call the interior lot line a side yard property line, rather than a rear yard property line. He added that calling that property line a side yard property line will also allow the existing home to remain, which is a goal of the City Council. He showed examples of similar subdivisions, and discussed the side yard property lines, and rear yard property lines in those examples. He stated that when he first started considering this proposal he was told that there could be a variable rear yard setback line. He added that on issues of ordinance ambiguity, the common court precedent is to interpret it to the advantage of the landowner. Kluchka opened the public hearing. Seeing and hearing no one wishing to comment, Kluchka closed the public hearing. Blum referred to the site plan and note that the property line in question seems to bend at the back corner of the house, so the other properties the applicant referred to are a bit different than the subject property. Waldhauser stated that if the lot had been split without the existing house on it, the interior lot line would have been considered to be a side yard lot line, so it doesn't seem logical to call it a rear yard lot line at this point. She said this new proposal is an improvement over the other options, and is preserving the existing house. She said she thinks the Planning Commission would mostly be in favor of straightening out the lot line. Segelbaum said the property line in questions looks like a rear lot line. He agreed that if the house were not there, it would be a different story, but he thinks the intent of the Code is to have unbuilt property in back of the house. He said he also agreed that the Planning Commission wanted the lot to not be such an odd shape, but he wishes there were another way to draw the property line without necessitating a variance. Minutes of the Golden Valley Planning Commission August 25, 2014 Page 3 Kluchka questioned if it is fair to say that the Planning Commission asked that the property line be straightened, when they didn't know about the rear yard versus side yard issue. Waldhauser stated that the lot line could be re-drawn and there would not be a backyard on Lot 1 at all. Segelbaum said he is concerned about setting a precedent in how the Planning Commission interprets this issue, and how future proposals would use it going forward. Kluchka said he is not in agreement with calling the interior lot line a rear yard property line. Blum agreed, and reiterated that this proposal is not like the pie shaped examples they were shown, because they clearly start as two parallel side lot lines. MOVED by Segelbaum, seconded by Blum and motion carried 3 to 1 to recommend deniaf of the preliminary plat amendment. Commissioner Waldhauser voted no. 3. Informal Public Hearing — Con 'tional Use Permit— 601 Boone Avenue North — TruStone Financial — CU-13 � pplicant: TruStone Financia;�: . ��I: Ad ss: 601 Boone Avenue�North , ii, Purpose. To allow the applicant to operate a new credit union witt�.t.�=r��"e`drive- ' thru lanes in the Cojmmercial zoning district. ,' ��3� Zimmerman stated that;:�he applicant is requesting a Conditiqr��lt�Use Permit (CUP) in order to operate a new cre,dit union with #hree drive-thru,laries. He noted that a CUP was approved for this location in`r�008, but the project was->not constructed, so a new CUP is now required. He referred to a'�site plan a:nd expl�ir��d the applicants request to construct a one-story building with three d�i�e-thru lane�;iocated on the southeast corner of the building. He stated that 19 parking''`spaces�are required, and the applicant is proposing 31 spaces. He added that based on the i��urew of the application, and the evaluation of the factors listed in the Zoning Code, st�ff�is'�,,;ecommending approval of the proposed CUP. ,�� . �. �;� Kluchka asked if there are an,y�~material dr,ffe�r"��ces between this proposal and the proposal approved in 2008.:f�immerman ��ated�t�at the building is slightly smaller in this proposal. ��'`' ; � ,;; � t �``�, ,�^ ,i� �� Waldhauser asked .i�conditions could be ' dded regardin� landscaping and drainage. � Zimmerman statQc� that Conditional Use K;ermits really on°I� consider the land use. Waldhauser nq�ed that there seems to be:a lot of signage p` � osed. Zimmerman stated that they will e required to follow the Cit ,',s sign code re uire ents. q Kluchk sked about snow storage on the te. Zimmerman suggested the applicant addr s that issue, but he assumes snow would be stored on the south side of the site. Cl��' U� ��. C��°�Z � � �� i�. �`.� Planning Department 763-593-8095/763-593-8109(fax) Date: August 25, 2014 To: Gotden Valley Planning Commission From: Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager Subject: lnformal Public Hearing on Revision to Preliminary Plat for Minor Subdivision of 221 Sunnyridge Lane—David Knaeble, Applicant �,: .�� ;,.�m�..,��.ak�� .��„ � �, � �� . ��e.��5-��:�; ., . �::�,., ..,.,,.+«��f`�._.,..��;a ...,_.,. .. {"v x'S.>i..;�.,:t.`»ti�...�.*�", .�*`:,`.'."..,:��?.�"..,...'�x,.:�"'xu�;r .�"�.. F�`%"">`.,s,�..r, ,.. , .r'"ca.'�,`��t�r� w s Summary of Request The Applicant received approva► of the preliminary plat for a minor subdivision at this address from the City Council at their July 15 meeting. Prior to the submission of a final plat for approval, the zoning requirements governing lot width as they relate to subdivisions were modified by the City Council and became effective. The Applicant feels that the changes made to the zoning code now allow for a better design of the two new lots and is seeking approval to revise the preliminary plat in accordance with the new requirements. One complicating factor is that as these are unusually shaped lots, there is need for an interpretation as to if one of the new lots lines should be considered a side lot line or a rear lot line. The ability of the preliminary plat to be adjusted as desired hinges on this determination since a rear yard setback violation would be created under one of the scenarios. The current design creates two new lots that each meet the requirements of the City Code. City Code requires that each new lot be a minimum of 10,000 square feet in the R-1 Single Family Residential Zoning District. Lot 1, to the south, would be 10,467 square feet and the Lot 2, to the north, would be 11,038 square feet. City Code also requires that each lot have a minimum of 80 feet of width at the front setback line. Lot 1 to the south and Lot 2 to the north would have 119.1 feet and 84.8 feet of width as measured at the 35 foot setback line respectively. Under the revised plan, Lot 1 would be 11,455 square feet and Lot 2 would be 10,050 square feet. Lot 1 would continue to have 119.1 feet of width at the front setback line and Lot 2 would continue to have 84.8 feet of width at the front setback line. The change in the plat would involve shifting the line between the two lots to give Lot 1 a larger rear yard and make the shape of Lot 2 more regular. If this line is considered a rear lot line for Lot 1, as it was in the approved Preliminary Plat, the rear yard setback should be a constant value of 20%of the lot depth along the entire line. In this situation, the garage of the existing home would violate the rear yard setback of 21.5 feet by 6.5 feet as the structure is 15 feet from the lot line. If this line is considered a side lot line for Lot 1, the side yard setback would be 15 feet and the existing home would be in conformance with the zoning requirements for the R-1 district. In either case the dimensions of the new north lot would provide a sufficient building envelope for development. Qualification as a Minor Subdivision The proposed subdivision qualifies as a minor subdivision because the property located at 221 Sunnyridge Lane is an existing platted lot of record, the proposed subdivision will produce fewer than four lots, and it will not create need for public improvements (such as street construction). The applicant has submitted the required information to the City that allows for the subdivision to be evaluated as a minor subdivision. Staff Review of Minor Subdivision Staff has evaluated the proposed lot subdivision request as a minor subdivision. As previously indicated, the proposed subdivision would create two lots in the R-15ingle Family Residential Zoning District. The Applicant has submitted a survey of the existing lot prior to the proposed subdivision, as well as a preliminary plat displaying the two lots after the subdivision. The documents show the existing home will be kept. These documents provide the City with the necessary information to evaluate the proposed minor subdivision. City Engineer Jeff Oliver has submitted a memorandum dated March 17, 2014, regarding recommendations from the Public Works Department concerning the originaf request for subdivision approval. Since his review, revisions have been made to the preliminary ptat; however, Mr. Oliver has stated that the changes are minor and do not necessitate a second review. Requirements set forth in Mr. Oliver's memo are to be included in the recommended action of this subdivision. Qualification Governing Approval as a Minor Subdivision According to Section 12.50 of the City's Subdivision Regulations, the following are the regulations governing approval of minor subdivisions with staff comments related to this request: 1. Minor subdivisions shall be denied if the proposed lots do not meet the requirements of the appropriate zoning district. Lot 2 of the proposed subdivision meets the requirements of the R-1 Single Family Zoning District. Depending on the interpretation of the lot line separating the two new lots, Lot 1 may or may not meet the requirements of the R-1 Single Family Zoning District. 2. A minor subdivision may be denied if the City Engineer determines that the lots are not buildable. The City Engineer finds that the lots are buildable. 3. A minor subdivision may be denied if there are no sewer and water connections available or if it is determined by the City Engineer that an undue strain will be placed on City utility systems by the addition of the new lots. The addition of the new lots will not place an undue strain on City utility systems. 4. Approval of the minor subdivision may require the granting of certain easements to the City. The drainage and utility easements shown on the preliminary plat are acceptable. 5. If public agencies other than the City have jurisdiction of the streets adjacent to the minor subdivision, the agencies will be given the opportunities to comment. No other public agencies have jurisdiction over the streets adjacent to the site. 6. The City may ask for review of title if required by the City Attorney for dedication of certain easements. The City Attorney will determine if such a title review is necessary prior to approval of the final plat. 7. The minor subdivision may be subject to park dedication requirements. A park dedication fee of $2,930 (2% of estimated land market value with credit for one existing unit) shall be paid by the applicant prior to final plat approval. Recommended Action If the Planning Commission finds that the lot line in question is a rear lot line, Staff recommends denial of the proposed revision as the existing home on Lot 1 would not meet the requirements of the R-1 Single Family Zoning District. If the Planning Commission finds that the lot line in question is a side lot line, Staff recommends approval of the proposed minor subdivision subject to the following conditions: 1. The City Attorney will determine if a title review is necessary prior to approval of the final plat. 2. A park dedication fee of$2,930 shall be paid before final plat approval. 3. The City Engineer's memorandum, dated March 17, 2014, shall become part of this approval. 4. All applicable City permits shall be obtained prior to the development of the new lots. Attachments: Location Map (1 page) Memo from City Engineer Jeff Oliver dated March 17, 2014 (2 pages) Preliminary Plat Approved by City Council on July 15, 2014 (1 page) Site Plans dated February 17, 2014, and revised August 1, 2014 (4 pages) ci�� v f �g r.� �� o� " �� d va.��. .�� Public Works Department 763-593-8030/763-593-3988(fax) Date: March 17, 2014 To: Mark Grimes, Director of Community Development From: Jeff Oliver, PE, City Engineer Joe Fox, EIT, Water Resources Engineer ' Subject: Minor Subdivision— Kate's Woods—221 Sunnyridge Lane Public Works Staff has reviewed the application for a minor subdivision to be named Kate's Woods. The subdivision is located at 221 Sunnyridge Lane. Preliminarv Plat and Site Plan The proposed subdivision includes dividing the existing single-family parcel into two single-family lots with frontage on Sunnyridge Lane. The existing house will remain. The Developer will be required to obtain a City of Golden Valley Right-of-Way Management Permit for the installation of the driveway apron onto Sunnyridge Lane for the new home. Utilities The Developer has proposed the installation of sewer and water services for the new house. A City of Golden Valley Right-of-Way Management Permit, along with Sewer and Water Permits, will be required for the installation of these utilities. The parcel being subdivided was platted with drainage and utility easements which must be vacated. The Developer must submit an Easement Vacation Application. The preliminary plat for the current proposed subdivision shows six-foot drainage and utility easements along the sides of the new parcels and ten-foot drainage and utility easements along the front and back of the new parcels. These easements are acceptable as drawn. The existing home at 221 Sunnyridge Lane is compliant with the City's Inflow and Infiltration Ordinance. Stormwater Mana�ement The proposed subdivision is within the Wirth Lake sub-watershed of the Bassett Creek Watershed. This project does not meet the threshold for review by the Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission (BCWMC). G:\Developments-Private\Kate's Woods-221 Sunnyridge Ln\Memo_PW_MinorSubd.docx The Developer will be required to obtain City of Golden Valley Stormwater Management Permits for each new lot. At the time of permit application, Grading and Erosion Control Plans that meet City standards must be submitted. Tree Preservation This development is subject to the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance. Because each lot will be custom-graded at the time of home construction, the project will be considered a single-lot devetopment, in which a separate Tree Preservation Permit will be required for each lot. The Developer has submitted a Preliminary Tree Preservation Plan which will assist in the review of each permit application. Recommendation Based upon a review of the materials submitted by the Developer and appropriate City ordinances and standards, Public Works staff recommends approval of the minor subdivision for Kate's Woods. Approval is subject to the Developer obtaining the required permits and the new home becoming compliant with the City's Inflow and Infiltration Ordinance. Please let me know if you have any questions regarding this matter. C: Jeannine Clancy, Director of Public Works Mark Kuhnly, Fire Chief John Crelly, Deputy Fire Chief AI Lundstrom, Park Maintenance Supervisor and City Forester Jerry Frevel, Interim Building Official � 1FS�d� `� r N � � B-5 DENOiES SOIL BORING N ------- DEN07ES SILT FENCE/GRADING 11MlT � 1D — —1056- - DENOiES EXISTING CONTWRS � m � —1056— DENOTES PROPOSED CONTWRS 'c °� ~ J��/ »�>� DENOTES STORM SEWER Q � LL >�� DENO7E5 SANITARY SEWER � 0 �� YM� DENOTES WATER►IAIN o � � � xtose.23 DENOTES EXISTNG SPOT ElEVA710N 3 = M � �� X 1056.0 DENOTES PROPOSED SPOT ELEVAiION 01 n iy O�G`� �O�ry�� «��,Q DENOiES EMERGQJCY OVERROW ELEVA710N o � M � � � GV R-1 RESIDENTIAL 20NtNG cTANDARD9 ,� MIN. 10,000 SF LOTS � BO' LDT WIDTH (MEAS. AT 35' FSB) � � 35' FRONT SETBACK (�PEN PORCH 30' FSB) i� � �' 20% REAR SETBACK �� ,SEi � � 12.5' SIDE SETBACK CLOTS<100' AT FSB) CSEE HT. RULES) � � � 0 15' SIDE SETBACK CLOTS>I00' AT FSB> CSEE HT. RULES> 6g �6� � � MAX. BLDG, HEIGHT 28' �6• � � �: MAX. STRAIGHT WALL 32' CTHEN 2' SHIFT FOR B'> � � i ��^ � � EAVES CAN PROJECT MAX. 2.5' INTO SETBACKS � �•' �� DRIVEWAY 3' SSB� MAX. 40% COVERAGE IN FRONT YARD g$ �� '•� � `rw 52 � ��' . \ � � 5k .' SS.g'� �•.�,� ` r, 5 �' 1?y. �;� �\ � �� •��. � � � �� .•' � �� ,. •.\� � •N� �� . ' ' �� ` � ,' � ..� �� , � ! _ - ' � . o I i �.., __ � \ �� w � � �/ �� ' \�� \� � 1 f,�258 SF � 0 i , �\ \ n g� P� �+ I j 5�� / ,^ � ne�vN Hwr.. n� � � r�,h� �� 0 � � �� wo acnrco v..uc c„ I ` ,/. � � � \`�Q� 6'r)j .\ �1 �O �O .v� N /' � �� . ,�g. •�\ �1 �ti l ��. i � i� 's . i `. o � � � � • �'�;• � i i i� e �� ;�' = o � �� i �' ' �` � '€s�5 � S �� i� �G�se.so � `�� s��s �� / �' i � � ��r o a N \� / � ��/ / I I ��°�� '�o,� \ �� 4�/ / I I u E oS Y � � � ti� 0� � � eY€ogo o a ti � g'="� �� (�_ �-��\ /I Q.�� /I � � `_��.+WN -v / � � �� i� e� � �STING � � `� � � ' � HOUSE � � i � � /10,248 .S'� /at Abo�es,7oo !•h0 �� b � / s�,e -ass.�s j h �4g "� � :�� /• ,�a' / �;� ��O ^ u� ��\ �s, \ /��, / � �� A � �� O i,� �\ • � �� / � � .� �� '� �. / (�A 1�/�.�G v� J } � � / / � \ \ N� .. s s:` � � Q� 10,159SF �'i? 5,�� / � �� ' ' � �I� � � 6+• �c" � / Q 8-. � � a � E'� �. �� y v N Z N� . ��s �. . 6,�� O�� W a S � � ��, �,�� ,� w E a x c� J ��ryO^ \�� a BOUNDARY, TOPOGRAPHY AND � �J ry� iREE SURVEY BY S twtc � � SURVEYO SABRIEL LAND 2/�7/�4 �O, 15 0 15 30 �..ccr Na W�D�11W� SCALE IN FEET �3�� m.1L7LL�i THE LOCATIONS OF E%IS71NG UNDERGROUND UTL171ES ARE SHOWN IN AN APPROXIMAIE yy�r� WAY ONLY. THE EXCAVA'IING CON7RACTOR SHALL DEiERMINE THE EXACT LOCATON OF � ALL EXISi1NG UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. THE CONTRACTOR AGREES TO BE FULIY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES WHICN MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY HIS FAILURE TO E%AC1LY LOCAiE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UNDERGROUND UTiLIT1ES. n i�i�l3il�. ~ / r N � � B-5 DENOiES SOIL BORINC v � -----�� OENOTES SILT FENCE/GRADINC LIMIT � "� _,,:;;;- --- DENOTES pOSTING CONTOURS � � ^ � —10.56— DENOTES PROPOSEO COMTOURS � N .. � »—»— DENO7ES STORM SEWER °' Q c LL � >�—>� OENOIES SANITARY SEWER � � �6'�W� OEN07ES WA7ERMAIN o � �n � x�p56.23 DENOIES EXISTiNG SPOT ELEVATION � �' � � X 1056,0 DEN07ES PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION � E��O.SB.O DENOTES EMERGENCY OVERF101M ELEVAnON � t° °� m �n � � c � co � n GV R-1 RESIDENTIAL ZONING STANDARDS� � MIN, 10,000 SF LOTS ��¢ � � 80' LOT WIDTH CMEAS, AT 35' FSB) 'S : �� 35' FRONT SETBACK <DPEN PORCH 30' FSB> �a � � �' 20% REAR SETBACK i� � �' 12,5' SIDE SETBACK CLOTS<100' AT FSB) (SEE HT, RULES) � u� � � � 15' SIDE SETBACK CLOTS>100' AT FSB> CSEE HT. RULES) $ �.�� $ MAX. BLDG. HEIGHT 28' ,,�66 �Si � } �o: MAX, STRAIGHT WALL 32' (THEN 2' SHIFT FOR 8') 6� �. � � � EAVES CAN PROJECT MAX, 2.5' INTO SETBACKS �, � �i �•• '�� ' � � DRIVEWAY 3' SSBi MAX, 40% COVERAGE IN FRONT YARD x � �•' '•� i' � � ky2 � � � � .� y y %�, �2��8/ � /�� \\� �`�w � $ E � � � � •�,, � �. ' �� \ .' � OEP �� `� $�$ i �''� ��p� � � � � i� �t� \ \ � d�� ( ! �.;'�,EP �... —••—,•a � � �. . � { �� '��8� �••� � . - - �\ �� a�d� �i 10,� SF �j ..'� �•�� i� �� \ �o aEsrr�a n.uc � •� �•' �� ,� �� \ � 11 t�e�wr Nu. I � I �.�i �.Cj�yy� ��,�E%/ �- �� 0�\ �\\ \, �o O acatEn v..nt `, 1 /'.' ' �••��Z ��2 / /� �j� ��i �� 1 �Q C�� V v �� ` •'' �pP• ,/" �' ' ° \� '` •� � w �l '• ' pR � ' S5�' ss, ` '\ � � > � s . i � � \ � �/ ��o�.G/, �y/' � �� `1 `o e 0 / `��/ \ , V s � Z � . �' .;i .'�.;--'� . i�, p�.��s g wQ�� /��/ �•�/�i� �'rP£MOH�/M00/f#D ��ao I \I �� C 8 d Q �� ' � � �••�, � �� a N � � �/�11�45�'',SF ;�r.,,,r�--- � � �a�'�� Na 'YFQT�4L�AR£A P£R�SURVEa`21,�514 S � � �.�€� . (��O� � �n� � , '��`�'�� 5�� ' �� V : ��\ \ t%/£X. PAAO�� cc� � \ '� / -' `° � � ` EXISTING � � `�j �� '�a. + AOUSE �'`�0 � N• J<y \\ N�` ��TS� I�� W � �• /o � � �� Z � / � � �\ � � . s��'\ � / ,�k Q } . . .,'\• � i �� a N� SS s�` �� ° T^� } � J ,0,159 SF �. ��' p�,�e� oc�� o� �6- '�'B-,s�\�� // � � Q '�` �� ',. ,'' �� •ZS - [� �� M�cf� � �,Q �' �6h'� �p� � Q O /� ,��.• ��' w E a, Y C9 C�O- \ �� (�� BOUNDARY, TOPOGRAPHY AND � � J � V TREE SURVEY BY S ��/ � � � DEMARS-GABRIEL LAND 2 �I 7 �4 SURVEYORS. �O 18 D 1S 30 ��HI � WapV�un SCALE IN FEET �� LIILiiT THE LOCATIONS OF EJOSTING UNDERfYtOUND UTiIJTIES ARE SHOWN IN AN APPROXIMATE �i� WAY ONLY. THE EXCAVA7ING CONTRACTOR�iALL DEiERMINE 1HE EXACT LOCATION OF � ALL EXIS7ING UTILIi1ES BEFORE COMAiENqNG WORK. THE CONiRACTOR AGREES TO BE FAk�IJRE TO E�)f�ACnYFL�A�'IEY A�ND PRE�SE�RaVE�Y�AN�D ALL UNDERf��i�ununfY.s."�S � � �� -� \�� \ I�L�QL N o � � �yp � � I �� 2�� ' $ 8-5 DENOTES SOIL BORING v .N-� � / y(r� I � 5 n �-----� DENOTES SILT FENCE/GRADING LIMIT � M 1 ��x � �'0 ` � — —1056- - DENOiES EXISTING CONTWRS d � � i'�_�� 1 I'� / �� \ —1056— DEN07E5 PROPOSED CONTOURS � o, x �i� 1 �� '� � �/ ��+ \� �»�>� DEN07E5 STORM SEWER Q � LL � � � /� ]� � �� >�>� DENOTES SANITARY SEWER o � � .'� /� ,6 ��ii �� W 1 � �1 �� g'�� --e'—�— DENOlE$WATERMAIN 3 N m �i `�/ ��• �i i � I � � / �ni--�N� ��j? \ � X1056.23 c rn � DENOTES EXIS7ING SPOT EIEVATON � � / i //�� gIn'- � � \ \ /h X 1056.0 DENOlES PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION °' S. �n '� � ---8�'�� j � � \� •�� \ �� ry� E��OSO.O DEN07ES EMERGENCY OVERROW EIEVATION O c M � �� _�-8'4'�� ' e j �\ �� \ � � 'fr44- \ _ � � � hk' g�� 1 � ��' �� m- m„ \\ � �� S��/ � ` ' I \ �ss �/ \ �� R-1 RESIDENT2AL ZON7NG cTANDARDS� � � � � �84�_ � \ MIN. 10,000 SF LOTS � �\ � , ��, � � \ 90' LOT WIDTH CMEAS. AT 35' FSB> \ � ^ � �\ \ 35' FR�NT SETBACK C�PEN PORCH 30' FSB) � � �� r��,,,,, � � �,. \ 20% REAR SETBACK �s � �� i ,� � \ 12.5' SIDE SETBACK (LOTS<100' AT FSB) (SEE HT, RULES) � � i � \\�� \��` �� trb.��o_ \� \� �� MAXSB DG.EHEGHT�2gTS>I00' AT FSB) CSEE HT, RULES> � g ��' 1 A�. � \ i MAX. STRAIGHT WALL 32' (THEN 2' SHIFT FOR 8'> � � 66 �� 89yr � �� MH850 EAVES CAN PRDJECT MAX. 2,5' INTO SETBACKS �� 6i �� ,�, �� T DRIVEWAY 3' SSBJ MAX. 40% COVERAGE IN FRONT YARD �� .,_ 8� �r 4%CJ'3 Q tr a.�s�i r.n. va, J�w2 ��-v� js�, � �'_-848-- £ Q� o !c�,iJ � ( \\�� kc�� e f=' �•nr N'Ilw �C�y 7da�„�.u�?s"Pw 38�pQ�� -�� \ /��G 6 � y T � 5 � `` '__` \ �66 � � t � � re�ox� -__'846-� "'^ ---y�/ . �� \ � � E ��\\ \\ , � `\\��-- \ � \ \\ / � �� s�----------848------�,_ � � \ �� SHEET INDEX $ � ,� .' irem� _ _ __•---------��8�` ,rs.nro ��--848--- > > � —859— — — � _ _ � � _��_ , z SHEET DESCRIPTION � � �i - - � �/ /� Q�j � i � 1. COVER SHEET / EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN y �/e•a�.n. se -^-----852--��----, 4_i/i'��(��T�p'ni'".��0i�'� 10��e\�� l � 2. PRELIMINARY PLAT � C �� . o /� O� • �¢o,.. �,J s' 10''�°°d" '/��' //�^C �� \�� 3. PRELIMINARY GRADING UTIUTY PLAN � �` v u f0"M . b0_—�__ \\��'y O!V �LpTr� 16 � � �` ' � �u•y n�' , �--'� � ��f��__8 5 4__,� b+�'� � 4. P R E L I M I N A R Y T R E E P R E S E R V A T I O N P L A N \� /('' � � //'s� �/e'6j,�•� � ow�J _ \�� A � \ nz�� iu�.. � � �'i Q / 8 a-�Y w, l e'�� aa� sa - a.a tn.�-1 LY so� v� � � acarrn v.uc � / • �«�. , . , � � �,-��,r��——___ , �� ' n�� dVIL ENdNE�t � -� � ^� � � �� 5$• �� 1 � p� � \ � n-,V DAVID CROOK, RLS � \ u� O?�� 85 � �e�� TE RA ENGNE RING INC. X � � O t,� �� ,y � �y yr-� � � V DEMARS-GABRIEL SURVEYING �� \ .W v � �---J �j� (�� '"�^ ' �� Y� 6001 GLENWOOD AVE. 6875 WASHINGTON AVE. SO., �209 � \ \ ' .�"p / tr'3�r�oe � � �o' � � �@ EDINA, MN 55439 ' � e \ � / � / . � � � � � � � Sp� MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55422 �S o � � � � `'�►� .��h - � . __ 5 , 8 B ��I � � � � � 763-593-9325 763-559-0908 pe • i � � � i �� - . � 8 �s. � il y \ � � . � � peterknaebleOgmail.com decOqwestoffice.net e.��b C $ � �\ ,, � �\ ,i ,� GAR: vra�, �'1 , so�� _Ji � , ' 1� r,oa.�eseAo 1z. �(� � � �e e�s c o. \\ ---- � �\ � .�k��'� �/ fYV Q� 1 �`-fC � I ,e$ v'��o a � � . h +p' '� 1 I � �� ` � \ \ (O � � u e �S y �\ , `r' � �� \ ' � i � � �{�,�� €�� / N� 6i� .� ~:\ � \ / � t0 ' � i � I �t`0 8 o e o �� O f �_ \� ��a� \� I b 1 �/�� I / =��iWV! a� o�c�� , �, , �c.��---- . T 2 . � � � � � � �\ �/��' �?�w�� R`�\ . • I �\ � � i�� /�1 �� SITE ADDRESS: 221 SUNNYRIDGE LN., GOLDEN VALLEY, MN �� ,�' �,� � �� ay0--��, �`i O�E�TLN�� ' i i i j i SITE AREA: 21,505 SF �\ , , ,. � �� HOUSE , � � � i � y� �� '�� CS� o/ � W � �Q� ��,�' EXISTING ZONIN6: R-1 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL Z \\ �! �,,,,, \�g5�� \~ 'r� � �� ' � /�� Q LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 1, BLOCK 1, KUCZEK ADDITION a � �� r i'\ � \ l �� b /� � �� s�.s�.., .\ ��-� V � � �� ! •�� ,,,�,� ABSTRACT PROPERTY Z � � � ,' '�0 �,� ` 0�� . � � � ��" �� _ - O i i r� �o•,w m� 0� � \ ' e� i i � � ' F N� � � ` �'°" i� / � C � � � � °J�^"�� / �� V w T� p Q �� 10.159 �F 59�0/ �6025ss��,6,�'9s+�r�n��"� \� �i sm.co� �� / W �9 i � a � .. �� i io ,�e• 6 � i� N N y W 1 � i 6� F � \$6� �� • �d��;, j � / v Z L,.I i I i 60 ��s ',� �\. /� � % � �. �/ � F 1-� � i � /v aYu.. �� ' � i O OScY� ', ; '; ,,%� � , �Q�`��'6 '; ; -�•� E�IE 1\/� w E c� w i . � � � ,� '� °^ , ' `' �, JUL 15 2014 S % cy � , ��' �' J� � �,� i , ; � ' ;��\, � � 2/17/14 � � ; ', + ; i ��s�, --" BY: i i �3nu i � � w " ,e 0 15 30 n�o..�� y�pV�� SCALE IN FEET �� P LAN S ��y�➢i TT` T�� riE LOCATIONS OF EXISTINC UNDERCROUND U11LI11ES ARE SHOWN IN AN APPROXIMATE U�� ! ` J WAY ONLY. iHE EXCAVAiiNG CONiFtACTOR SMALL DEiERMINE THE EXACT LOCA710N OF �T� INO�R S 1 V NLLYXRESPqJSBLE FOREANYEANDALL DIAMA6ESKWMICH IAIGMmT BE OCCASIONED BY HIS 1 � FAILURE TO E%ACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UNDERGRWND Un�T1ES. � 1E�11� " N � $ B-5 DENOlES SOIL BORING o .N-v �-----� DENOTES SILT FENCE/GRADING UMIT � M � - -1056- - DENOTES EXISTNG CONTOURS a� :9 'o . -7pg5- DENOTES PROPOSED CONTWRS � � % � =»�>� DENOTES STORM SEWER ¢ c LL >�>� DENOIES SANITARY SEWER v � �� • �� 6'�1M� DENOiES WATERMAIN 3 ui M xio56.23 DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVA710N X 1056.0 DEN07ES PROPOSED�OT ELEVA710N °' a M . (�� E�«��.0 DENOTES EMERGENCY OVERFLOW ELEVAl10N ti a10i � � • �� O C M � � � ' � f�� R-1 RE�IDENTIAL ZONING �TANDARDSi �� MIN, 10,000 SF LOTS � ^ � 80' LOT WIDTH (MEAS, AT 35' FSB> � 35' FRONT SETBACK COPEN PORCH 30' FSB> i� �� 20% REAR SETBACK � �� • 12.5' SIDE SETBACK <LOTSCI00' AT FSB) CSEE HT. RULES> � �� 15',SIDE SETBACK CLOTS>S00' AT FSB) CSEE HT. RULES> � MAX, BLDG, HEIGHT 28' � �� o. 6a SE� y_.� +'�_ MAX. STRAIGHT WALL 32' CTHEN 2' SHIFT FOR 8'> � ��6 6�� ''1 � �� ' c� � DRIVEWAYN3P SSB�CMAXA40? COVERAGE INAFRONT YARD �� '�• '� • � • •\• • . `� �� y�38 �// , • •\ . � 5k � � 58� �� .v� �\ a � `' � y5� � �.�- � � �� , . � , � �2.' � ' �� . � .o�. /:� / ,.•� /P�� '•�N� �\ �� i . � � i� i Q \ � �� '' i�Q'� � ' \ � &�� c �� j ��p� ' , _.._, ' ��z . • � ( ' � � 'ga� � • � / --- . \\� . .' �� , �i � � . �� V i • i' /� 16.87 �. � A ncnr,veo r..uc �': 10,P50 SF o,�.' �•i' ' �: �� . � •n na�wu wu. � •� � �a! . .55`'8 �i�� \ �� \ tnW arart� v..ut , WO �O , � . � �o � � I � �I �';�`y �i � • i Z)•�, .t��j �� 1 ' to0 � V 1 i / ` i � �� /� > \ ��esya �, . � 1 ' .' f 2 �S � �. .�,�`S3'� � �� 30 � � � �' 9 �•.' ' '. .'.. .\ . �° 'as = �� .' k�. Ssg.: ''1 .`. i E��a � $ . s��€= � � � / �5..� j J � 98ss � l+�' � � / � �Ce�oo u O \ i / .�.� � • 8 D«p � ��/ � �/' � .�� ' ! � • � ��90°c o u+ � ` �� 11.455''gF � . � I . �.,9°§� ¢ ryO �'� 6T��AREA P£R SUR�EY 21,505 SF ` � ,' i � �`€'8 � I o$a `y° Y e �_ �\ �" ; � `_e§�W�, � 8 ��/ �-'_ F.� � , ' .. • � .� � �� •� , • I � �o \ 1 1 C' � � �' • ' 0 I � \� ui�.� � • �'hh� ' /� , Na' � �4� � � ie �, \\ \�� %o, ��p Z . / / �� •� !' , � � � • �� S`S. / ` s�\ \ / / • �� , j / ��' . . �, � ,� a s 6, \ � � 10,159 SF � � � � 7 s'`'�• �SF�� ' ' ,� ' Q-� E C E I�F�C N � ?�•. . � . . z ��. ��,v,'� ,��°� • �<v JUL 15 2Q14 „ <o . � ,��,'�6 �� BY: w E a x c� O, \ • �� ^-�� BOUNDARY, TOP06RAPHY AND � �/ J v 1REE SURVEY BY S m�r � � � OEMARS-GABRIEL LAND 2/'�7/'�IF SURVEYORS. � 15 0 15 30 �� 30' �� 5�,� ,N �� 13-111 (1 THE LOCATIONS OF EXISIING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE SHOWN IN AN APPROXIMATE yy�.�Ny WAY ONLY. THE EXCAVATNG CONTRACTOR SHALL DE7ERMINE TME EXACT LOCA710N OF � ALL EXISTNG UTIUTIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. TME CON7RACTOR AGREES TO BE FaLURE TO ENXAICT�LYF�OCAiE AND PRESERVE ANYYAND ALLGUNDERG�RWND�UTI�IJT8IESMIS ti � ��/�/y � � � �� / �p ii�1ii71f�. N � � � � j ��'b'. 2��" ' $ B-S DENOTES SOIL BORING � � � � y y � � 5 ��n -----�� DENOTES SILT FENCE/GRADING UMIT w � � /��I� i � "� — —�056- - DENOTES EXISTNG CONTWRS � � � ��-'�-� � I`� � 1 \V� DENOiES PROPOSED CONTOURS � v°� �� / �►� I � \; \>.z � �> ��>� DENOTES STORM SEWER a � LL i� /�(,�(� 1 /�� .� � \' �>�>� DENOTES SANITARY SEWER v ��, �/J �6 �/ � /� � J � �1 \� a�'G i/ �'�W� DENOTES WATERMAIN °; w m /� �• k� ��j / j ' / ��` �k�2 \\ \ /�� X 1056.0 DENOlES PROPOSED SPOT ELEVA710N d n ro DEN07E5 EXISTING SPOT ELEVAlION �_� � / � � �� \ � ♦ DENOTES EMERGENCY OVERFLOW ELEVATON � a10i � � ----� � � / �\ \ � \ � � ry � ��.Q o � M � �$ ��,$�� 1 � � � �` �\ , \\\ \\ / "B4q--� I� m � m ��i� kk. a� � ' �i /� \1 . \ / � N � s�/ � ��84 • I 1 \� PR P. S&W �� R-1 RECID NTIAL Z�NING cTANDARDSi � � � ?^ �SE�CES MIN. 10,000 SF LOTS �\ �\\ � , �\ � BO' LOT WIDTH CMEAS, AT 35' FSB) ��r \ ¢.� \ 35' FRONT SETBACK COPEN P�RCH 30' FSB) � �s �\ .�\ \ \ 20% REAR SETBACK \ 12.5' SIDE SETBACK CLOTS<100' AT FSB) CSEE HT. RULES> $ � �� \ 15' SIDE SETBACK CLOTS>100' AT FSB> CSEE HT. RULES) �� \ �� MAX. BLDG. HEIGHT 28' �� \ � MAX, STRAIGHT WALL 32' <THEN 2' SHIFT F�R 8'> � �� i � �MH850 EAVES CAN PROJECT MAX. 2.5' INT❑ SETBACKS ��\\ �`\_ � ` �0• ,� �� DRIVEWAY 3' SSB� MAX. 40% COVERAGE IN FRONT YARD � � (�Q• �.� _ •� . \ ��--8�#8-- � �� '--_ /� • �� ,, � i ��G �� -, - �66 � � � ` • ' �p0� --e � '� � i �� `` �� --- - --- �\ �\ i �� ,_ i r �__ •�:--- ---- 848------� $�0_ . \ ,�"� ��_ NEW LOT TO BE CUSTOM GRADED ` � � 6AR-B50.0-85A— — — / --848�� X -6�48-- �� ,��. _ �, �,�,— _ ,\ ,� AND CLEARED BY BUILDER. �— � BSMT 843.D ' — � � , / o TB 85��-----85 --,�-- - `-— — — . \� / � aaC -� ` /�• . o :YST 853.1 =;�, � .�_ _ \\__--- ` � \�� 1$ T ��` . � �� • -852--, � � � \� arsm�ro v..u. \ � i__ i � -_ � � \ \ nenvw wu. \ ,� � � ♦ ___ � '-------_,\�� ararn P..uc \\ / \/ • . � �� \ �� _ �� \ \ � � � � _ � � � ' f�' 4t a, , -,.' • � � � � \ � � � � �` �\ o � �g �� f� -a�' a5 ' �8� � ` .`� � 1 � X .- i . •� � � � \��\` \\` .W� f `� y. �A/ , 8\�� \ ��\ \\ � �� 6�\ aoo f Z � � p o � � 1 �' ��T��f � � ' 85 ' \ i�i \ �� \� � e�.�$e � ` oS �� . ii� ' GAR. •t � � ' � � «9g�s �� \ �� / / /' ibw-ese.go �J 1 . I � Tip� d a � ___ . \ i � . . �'9(i� I � ,\ � I re°��o a ��\ � �\ � �\�\ • . �� c >> j ~ . �� I Sg€E§S Y� \ i 1 � � 7g-� \ 1 I B; °`g � . \ � � Y �o \ n / / �:�� / �O / I ' � m � o \\ ' VO J { ----- � �"6�� \ � � 1 �/��J�� I / �E�iWw a o \ (1/ �� . . 1 I u`�i � � /� �� \ �/�i .; • I �\ � m � � �� \�� .'� / ye--��,, ,�i EXISTING } i f I � � �� . , � i i � 1 � , , � HOUSE , � i � � ��' J?, „�n�.-as�.ao o � � 'p \�.,� � • i // $� a��.-esa�s \ti W � �r � �0� / 7 � i� ah � 1 ��0 / I ��/ � �/ �^� ��'�/I \�� j �/ �p� Z � � i� � . O � �� , � / •� /7 /'�\ - - �Z � � �/ � 6�O \ � � / / � � �� 1 � ( � i � wa,�� / / �� J N W � / d G-J � i �' � � `� � ,l � i p J � . �,� i � c/-�►C `� / � I� 59��/�$6�25 ,� . / o • � u � /� ��'� GI.�G� M � N Q� �� 1 � I 69 � � �6� �� i � � \� // v JV1� � � 2�1� ?F �W 0 i � � / � 1 � 6 ' , / � � �. � �� I / / � 1 / � � I� i �i ,, - // � % i �/ � �Y: w E a a Y� i i � ^ ; � � � �� . � � ' � 1II O � , j � � �� ^-�� BOUNDARY, TOPOGRAPHY AND , � , �cy � , ;� ; J � IREE SURVEY BY S ��' ; I i � �`�� DEMARS-GABRIEL LAND 2/�7/�4 I 1 I � ' � �\ __ SURVEYORS. I I � / / /��851 15 0 15 30 �-�T� i � '� `3��' i i ; � 13-111 I I \ � / / / �� y�py�� SCALE IN FEET �DY71L�i � (1 I �� THE LOCATIONS OF EXIS7ING UNDERGROUND UlILI11ES ARE SHONM IN AN APPROXIMATE y,�r Ny WAY ONLY. iHE E%CAVATING CONiRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF � � ALL EXISTING U11LIT1ES BEFORE COAIMENCING WORK. 1HE CON7RACTOR AGREES TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES WHICH MIGMT BE OCCASIONED BY HIS F/ULURE TO EXACTLY LOCAIE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UNDERGRWND U71LI11ES. � � � � jF.S�d� � � ��= \� � � e-s DEN07ES SOIL BORING v ti � 0 \(� �—�———� DENOTES SILT FENCE/GRADING UMIT � '� �A \�� \� — —1056— — DENOTES EXIS7ING CONTWRS d ;q � � ' Z —�py5— DENOTES PROPOSED CONTWRS 'c vc, r � �N i� \��" �\. �»�>� DENOTES STORM SEWER Q c � �'C � ��>� DENOTES SANITARY SEWER a � � (1� 0'( � � ��'�W� DEN07ES WAIERMAM o q M �- y � SN � � � xio5e.23 DEN O 7 E 5 EXI S T IN G S P O T E L E V A 7 1 0 N � � �36, 8�� \ � � X 1056.0 DEN07E5 PROPOSED SPOT ELEVA710N � � � � � (�, �♦��Q DEN07E5 EMERGENCY OVERROW EIfVAl10N ,� � � . � � �y oo c � , . � � io g r to•(p�m. \ \ � "'� � � �V R-1 RESIDENTIAL Z�NING C_7pNDARDCi �� MIN, 30,000 SF LOTS �rr„ , �� 80' LOT WIDTH CMEAS. AT 35' FSB) �� 35' FRONT SETBACK <OPEN PORCH 30' FSB) e��,.�w� • , �� 20% REAR SETBACK �s (,) � \ 12.5' SIDE SETBACK CL�TS<100' AT FSB> CSEE HT. RULES) � �„� to•a �\ � IS' SIDE SETBACK CLOTS>100' AT fSB> CSEE HT, RULES) \ MAX, BLDG, HEIGHT 28' � MAX, STRAIGHT WALL 32' (THEN 2' SHIFT FOR 8'> � �� EAVES CAN PROJECT MAX. 2.5' INTO SETBACKS r O�u O �y,�'p *'� �� J.. �B ' �\ �\ DRIVEWAY 3' SSB� MAX. 40% COVERAGE IN FRONT YARD r y '°� �r w» �e'n» '�� a. .�-�n m, ir rw� �� \ � �� \ \ �� 2 • � Q� . �M � eo.m. ��\ � ## � 88 � \\ �� . tt'br LtlrO 51 • 1z, 0,,,0 �`� �°'�",9 �� NEW LOT TO BE CUSTOM GRADED � � i °�• . �`�� `� AND CLEARED BY BUILDER. �&� • /�1du EIM SB �yM r�Y�lN�N�a�r ��/11e� � �Cp wi Ci t/�' `"�� . 0� 059 �f0'du Fldv � OYS �f7 �J � � �'d�b od � �,r,w 10�M 61O�Q�� 'Q�� 1 0'Bv O!r �0'Bu \ �\ DEtlGtD P.JX. '� 3� �'qp� C�' 15 �� OPAYH NAi. O� 8�-fYM ,• � �3 � d � e'aa� . Q O�r r,� e ma n. fY m. � \\ O acarn P.uc { � /'� /�'��?? ` � SS(� \ • OTi �"ov 12 V� H tOy�nce \ � , ��'Ltder � f/ (�66 U'MA • O ` � x � ` f/ . y�'� 10� �\ , C`o o Y � OM'°Mo' `��q r � . B \ � —Ooe c S 2 11' � �� . • • caR. d , ° ,. �°�:,• 1 ; ��z:. � � G.o 9 us 8 �i ibw.LY80 ��. I o e a . / • • n c$e�«b � �J / 67OY8'�+urs �p. 6� �70' � ' •�-p �� tY' � Y sb 9 v� g , i � E�� Y � . • ' 1 '� i f �€og � �Yo—co � ip /`��1' �,� , I � �e��WN d O �• ID'du OM . • � • I � EXISTING I ► HOUSE � � �� ' � csm �� l� o ,.�,�.�� , �p e,�n�.•asa�a �s'�°P�' �QQ /'? r sa�o. �� / �ro /� <� � �A Z Z �n �o . • �, % � Wg � ,r�.,�s� i � W a L�`' �� ` � % �Z N �a� ��` 1/ / �� F �9 , p6 f i C " °� i�� / C�� N �� N W � �! � �p ' � �' .lt�L t 5 2014 �� / / WW �O �i �� w E adY� O^ • � � �� p� BY: � � � BOUNDARY, TOPOC,RAPHY AND �� J � TREE SURVEY BY S ��/ / � � (/� � DEMARS—GABRIEL LAND 2 �7 �4 � SURVEYORS. � �M�� ts o �s ao r,+�eoo.rc��n �0, / �.3�� SCALE IN FEET � / / 1HE LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTLI7IES ARE SHOWN IN AN APPROXIMAIE yy�� WAY ONLY. 7HE EXCAVATNG CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF � ALL E%ISTING UTILITES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. THE CONIRACTOR AGREES TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES WHICH MIqiT BE OCCASIONED BY NIS FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. 4�t�Y �� •�.'<; 'i:�i�:��;�ti'. �� ,T�,,, �'�,� Planning T}epartment 763-593-8Q95 i 763-593-8109(fax) "'��IPi��Y�l(�C��"�z ��^��r�»- . - TM�Pii9�i��EthRauc�:;;: �.7- `�C!dV��l��lt;�,,� '=;�dpi��u�!"� . . .. a+�°u"�C�Iililb ' Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting September 16, 2014 Agenda Item 4. E. Continued Public Hearing- Ordinance#527 -Amendments to the Zoning Map - 305 and 345 Pennsylvania Avenue South - Lake West Development, LLC, Applicant Prepared By Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager Summary The Applicant, Lake West Development, LLC, intends to construct 30 detached townhome units across 3.3 acres as part of a Planned Unit Development (PUD) located at 305 and 345 Pennsylvania Avenue South. In order for the Preliminary Design Plan to be considered, the City Council must first consider amendments to both the General Land Use Plan Map and the Zoning Map. Without these amendments,the proposed use would not be consistent with the guiding or zoning of the properties. The Planning Commission reviewed the proposal at its July 14 and July 28 meetings and recommended approval. The City Council held a public hearing at its August 19 meeting and has since tabled this item to September 16. Zoning Map Amendment The property at 305 Pennsylvania Avenue South is currently zoned Single Family Residential (R-1), which provides for single family dwellings on lots of 10,000 square feet with SO feet of width at the minimum front setback line. The property at 345 Pennsylvania Avenue South is currently zoned I-394 Mixed use, which requires a mix of uses (residential, commercial, office, otherj on the site. Under the current proposal, the Zoning Map would be amended so that both of the properties would be zoned as Medium Density Residential (R-3), which provides for medium density housing of up to 10 units per acre. Based on the density of the proposed PUD of 9.1 units per acre, Medium Density Residential zoning would be the most appropriate designation for the two properties. The PUD process will allow for greater flexibility in designing the site layout and accommodating various setbacks. In order to be consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan,the City should wait to act on this item until the Metropolitan Council has approved the recent Comprehensive Plan amendment reguiding these properties to Medium-Low Density Residential. Recommended Action Motion to table Ordinance #527, Rezoning 305 and 345 Pennsylvania Avenue South,to the City Council meeting of October 7, 2014. cit�r o�f x, �, Planning Department 763 593 8095/763 593 81 Q9(fax) Executive Summary for Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting September 16, 2014 60 day deadline: August 15, 2014 60 day extension: October 14, 2014 Agenda Item 4. F. Continued Public Hearing- Preliminary PUD Plan for Laurel Ponds PUD No. 117- 305 and 345 Pennsylvania Avenue South - Lake West Development, LLC, Applicant Prepared By Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager Summary Lake West Development, LLC, is seeking approval of a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Permit to construct 30 detached townhome units across 3.3 acres at 305 and 345 Pennsylvania Avenue South. This item is continued from the September 2, 2014, City Council meeting. At that meeting, the Council asked the Applicant to work with Staff to make design revisions to the proposed development. Staff met with the Applicant and reviewed several concepts before receiving the revised plan found in the agenda packet. While Staff has not yet had time to perform a complete review of this revised proposal, the main elements the Planning Commission and City Council have desired seem to be included and the project as a whole appears to be moving in the right direction. In summary, the new plan aligns the lower private drive with Quebec Avenue South, reduces the number of units to 27 and thereby provides some additional open space, adds parking space on-site, and provides opportunities for some of the units to be constructed for single-level living. At the August 19 City Council meeting, the Council approved an amendment to the General Land Use Plan Map which reguides these properties to Medium-Low Density Residential. Until the Metropolitan Council approves this change, it is the recommendation of the City Attorney that no action be taken on the Preliminary PUD Plan. Based on the initial comments of the City's Metropolitan Council representative, Staff is comfortable moving forward with approval of the revised Preliminary PUD Plan with the conditions listed below. Attachments Location Map (1 page) Applicant's Narrative and Diagrams (5 pages) Site Plan dated September 10, 2014 (1 page) Example Floor Plans (2 pages) Recommended Action Motion to approve the Preliminary Plan for Laurel Ponds PUD No. 117 subject to the following conditions: 1. The plans prepared by EVS, dated 6/13/14, submitted with the application and the revised plan prepared by EVS, dated 9/10/14, shall become a part of this approval. 2. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Engineering Division to Mark Grimes, Community Development Director, dated July 10, 2014, shall become a part of this approval. 3. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Fire Department to Mark Grimes, Community Development Director, dated July 7, 2014, shall become a part of this approval. 4. The Applicant shall submit a lighting plan as part of the Final PUD Plan set. 5. All principal buildings shall conform to the rear and side property setbacks when adjacent to a single family zoning district as outlined in Section 11.55, Subd. 3(C)(1). 6. No buildings shall be located less than fifteen feet from the back of the curb line for roads that are part of the internal road system as outlined in Section 11.55, Subd. 3(C)(2). 7. Unless a wavier is granted by the City, any streets constructed within the development shall be public streets as required in Section 11.55, Subd. 6(A)(6). 8. The Applicant shall install sidewalks along Pennsylvania Avenue running the length of the property and on the east side of the property south to Laurel Avenue. 9. The easement reduction request from 55 feet to 45 feet will be considered pending review of an enhanced landscaping plan. 10. The Applicant shall prohibit the installation of fences within the development. 11. The Applicant is encouraged to explore a range of housing types and designs. 12. Building materials shall be reviewed by the City prior to Final Plan approval. 13. Permits to construct parking bays on the property at 7400 Laurel Avenue shall be obtained by that property owner and shall not be located closer than fifteen feet to the side property line, as required in Section 11.47, Subd. 6(B), unless a variance is obtained. 14. Any cross parking agreements that are created shall be submitted to the City for review and shall be recorded with the Final Plat. 15. The Fina) Plat shall include "P.U.D. No. 117" in its title. 16. The City Attorney shall determine if a park dedication fee is required for this project prior to Final Plan approval. 17. Al) signage must meet the requirements of the City's Sign Code (Section 4.20). 18. This approval is subject to all other state, federal, and local ordinances, regulations, or laws with authority over this development. In addition the Council makes the following findings pursuant to City Code Section 11.55, Subd. 5(E): 1. The PUD plan is tailored to the specific characteristics of the site and achieves a higher quality of site planning and design than generally expected under conventional provisions of the ordinance. 2. The PUD plan preserves and protects substantial desirable portions of the site's characteristics, open space and sensitive environmental features including steep slopes, trees, scenic views, creeks, wetlands and open waters. 3. The PUD plan includes efficient and effective use (which includes preservation) of the land. 4. The PUD plan results in development compatible with adjacent uses and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and redevelopment plans and goals. 5. The PUD plan is consistent with preserving and improving the general health, safety and general welfare of the people of the City. 6. The PUD plan meets the PUD Intent and Purpose provision and all other PUD ordinance provisions. ._ � .�_� � �, � f I i . ;�,� �---.�..��,_�-?+��'a�k�`•,;k:!":'�e--4�:�-'�'Z,,-;.��,`,�,_,.�-- ` t,aoa,s P;s,rr � � 1 � f �N '�"'=` `��'_'__�-�--'^'� � . �; � �-�-- � Q. � �� p = r f ,1 `V�\ ' S^` \ / . � a �ry �. �� Q \ '�1 yL \/ � 'Jt > �� a Y � � a' � I� z Subject Properties: $ � 305 & 345 Pennsylvania Ave. S. '� - ; s �� u�dyowoy(id � .. � /( \ � �� . ,�'y � Cotun�;�l R� r ._.._.._..�-.•-�•% , � i�-"-, . . , J . _...._ ... �° ( _ oue� �n � d ' �� WeSfRingPORQ `-�' r � >t � ' ( Eest Rirlq Pon�i f 1 � � � - ._.__._�___. / - ~ � _ - . _,,_ _ i � � A�einve— - � . . � r—_ �----�� __ i � ( � � . � � ur Q � • � � Q _ �' 'v e � '1 ( • ' .:::r, :7� , ,9 � • .�..,. . � 1 � � � � . .,,rf;; Laure!Ponds Plan Amendments issues and Changes or Clarifications September 10,2014 Council Members and Staff Based on the goals voiced by staff and Council,we believe we have sadsfied all the concerns with the amended site plan prepared by EVS. Here is how plan changes satisfy the issues in flur opinion. Density Reduction; A Loss of 3 units may still be bankable. A Loss of 4 units becomes quesdonable.At our meeting of September 9�,staff did not be}ieve we needed to lose any more than 3 units from the origina130 in order to accomplish all of the goals. A density of 27 DU is still medium density. Lower density achieved. Quebec Ave �ntry to private drive. Mr.Oliver seemed comfortabte with a design aimed at the Quebec intersection,but not perfecdy parallel. He has been flexible with our design engineers to achieve the objective. To accommodate this request a unit is lost in Raw S and a nvn-standard home is created. Because it is still a single unit,this should not impact the HDA equity for each unit We woutd need to work with the homebuilders on a floor plan that takes advantage of the opportanities of the resulting building envelope. It is main floor bedroom eligible and a garage size of at least 22 x 22 �ts at the initial opening at a distance similar to lots 9 and 18 from the Pennsylvania right of way.It is desirable to enter on the high side of the lot,but could also be on the lower side further from the entry if a non-single level living unit is sacrificed. The upper loop has been changed to a one way road,minimizing confusion over where to park. It also becomes safer to Quebec as the entry is the middle access and the exit is the upper access,closer to the top of the hill for visibility. Guest Parking: Each driveway was examined for places ta be more effective and define spaces. The lower row added parallel spaces defined for 5 total spaces,plus Row 6 lost a unit The end of the drive at Workabilities is solely a turn around that works for UPS, Fed EX etc.for their current defivery fleet per the Rosevitie delivery managers we have met with ta date. Parking is still allowed on all the driveways in undefined locations between garage aprons. We have however,widened the driveway to define 7 statls and shifted the proof of parking to the outside of the loop where permanent parking previously was shown. The bays are evenly spaced and the loss oE one lot on the tuck under side of the loop creates a good amount of open space for added planting from the parking stalls. Tuesday,September 9,2014 Down 1 unit on Row 3 adds all necessary permanent guest parking for upper loop along with defined bays near Pennsylvania. The overtlow guest parking agreement with Workabilities is still being granted for another 20 stalls for evening,weekend and holiday times when they are not operating. High ratio of guest stalls per DU achieved. Over the code by a strong amount Open Space: Due to the turning of units on lots 4,8 and Density down total of three units. Creativity has been added to the pond,the units have slid back to honor the easement,and the conceptuai sitting space drawn and submitted in�uly can still be achieved. Pond Design shape: Capacity has been only con�rmed by EVS staff through consultation with City staff, but use of boulders and shape undulations confirmed to achieve more creative design. This fits into the easement and creates the home setback distances. Th use of boulders is preferred in the final detail design and makes subde changes possible all along the design edge. Goal Achieved Design Flexibility for homes: Should the Council see�t,we would seek a clarification to the easement document to allow upper floor encroachments to balconies into the easement area since it does not impede any oFthe drainage issues. Doors could open out onto the open space and a hard surface door landing wou)d be an allowable encroachment since it is not structure. Lot 1 does not come as close to the ponding area,and if the Council sees fit could encroach up to 5'or more if an easement amendment is warranted. This would create a more tlexible home plan for tax purposes.It is not required for the base floor plan use. Singie level living eligible floor plans: This is a topic of interest for many. We have shown in plans submitted that any time we have the garage aligned with the main floor,that bedroams,kitchen and living can be designed as handicap or mobility concerned on one floor. Qther flaors are avaiIable for other room functions. This altows for downsizing from the yard maintenance but doesn't sacrifice the home options yet for storage,guest rooms and play rooms. These are highlighted in blue. With your agreement and vote to approve, we will be able to start the final development plan process and continue our work on a phase one plat that is likely to resemble the attachment fn orange fnr possfble model home start at SOS Pennsylvonfa once the finat p[at and development qgreement issues are ftnished. Tuesday,September 9,2014 ��" �f�� _ � '�i�� i � � � � .�� 4 i � i , �` � � � a � re— � i�!!� � � € �� I�i�i ! � � ; ��a � � �C� 6 � �`� � �� I ( , 'f I ' ��! "l�a � � a � �W � • � ,��i„I � i11IiI . , a hy , r' � c �. .. . ._1 � 1 J 4 � , �{ ',a p 8 $} A s i —� u� ap N �••""� � .� i y ' .1B n.r � ��9� • .� � r ��}� t`�,7�T/� .+I� .�� •� �±�Ir � � i " !f� i j � 1 t � �-- . � ��+ } •�.: �.r r 1 I � E`� � f t` . _ j ', b, �,j dr' t �o '� .� � �,j � , � � � � � � � , .� � r, I �) ;� . � � �� P { ppp { � , i ' � �� :�-� ,� ,�I `- .t� � - _� �j�� It �µY { ��r'� j �I�1 fk� I j 1 , � ... _ u. 7. a. � .�'� I r �. .(--r'u w'.1�� _ � �� I I,j, J ' y . �sw� 't . � ! . t,� � . ' � � t,..�,�r f - '� '�r � _, ... � � � i : �� 3 � � • � �� t�r� �';�i-�,:� � � � .�j ��-� _. ,. � � � ! � —' r"r._.`ti_ , .. f~�T� ` ,i D 1' .........,»�_ .. ti.. �- -- � : � � �' .��.;� ,�� ' .,r_�� i � ' � � � � , � , � = � � r ...��;. . � i � ��,°, � ; i , _ � rr � ..3___ _ � �. ,��, . � n— __—,r_ j r t �, , s,� � , .�, ° �, . i � _ _ �._ . j� �O ' � ;� � a � �, � � � �•— �.� +�' ; � - r :� ' ; ; ' � �_ F � i J� t � � ; - �- � �� Y �y � �s`L J 'fIf � 1-- I .�yT , U 'r " � ', �,� ,�r�.!�(� �'� � �� •.• � � � �' , i� � "�� .`� � '�'; ` xk "-,��`' � � � C.,..� � �'� ' � '.� � , �� W � � ; t 1� �� ; � �-!i � ��" �� ;�� 8.�} �„J _ .�,- � " W ! � ' �i 1 J,. �, � � � i ; � . ' �'y-�'-'� r-,`` , ,,�: 1 � � I c� w ,,.�, � , ,.. � , z w � ,�- �� ....t_ u� r.w i � � �� .,- � � �� t p � t� 'w " ��{e � � � , f. 'y �9 •.�"'-�1�— �1� 1 ��i �3 �! .�.,..�.._,� ` '�� 1 ( 1 � I�� t� �' � � I t�� '. ; 1 1� � + � � )i! i � f t � p �� d 7 �� i I' — _. ' J i„. �_ a — �_ ' i - ~ �_� � . - � �f � _��P HA8E � ' � ', �-w->� � 1 �F�S£� � WEBEC AVE � " �d,�:r z i'�_��- �rt:w +}��v , ! ,�� _� ` �- � 1` •1 '�i ,� 1 L(Q,Cb Z - �i i; `; P� , �i; 1 � 'FT �i � ;i � � � �;�� r�� ; ' _� � , �--�i �__ i -�=�r -_-� ., � � � � � � � 1` � � i J r ,�,� -t- r�. .�— � ', � x� � � t � � � � � � � � � � s ;� � � � � � � � � � � � f � � � # ;---� � �� :�.� � � � � � � _;' j�` —�� ;', — �� , �� i n ► +.� g : • � �e � � �".�''�.� '�!J r� i �+ y" f ` � �� : � � �� • "� � ,�� f �j . � � , r � � -*_ �� ., � ; ' _��.._.., i S� � � � � �� p Y€� $ � � �� J I !� �� 2� � ��6� � �� !� a t � a � � � £ �tz � ;_.3.-j ' .` ' . ��.. _,. .._. _. ��` S t�� ;n , � �„--""`_.,�.,l,- orou M.e�s�.e�+ ��...., !� � �r�� ..__,.�� ' Yr, �� wU��nve~ �!'""'_"...------� �� e�� e ,: , ; �� 1 r_..� __ ._ �� _ _____. _ � . . rv� . � _ _ , . ,�.�_ r� �� e�� --�,� ��---- ._._.�.._.____.____� _ . . . . � .- ��t�- -�(rn�-- (��•i�� 1 i-,,� � �� ..J' , f ..V.,....� �..�.,:.�...� i g ��'.,_y.�� _`x;� i]� ` � � � � � —�.-.,..,� [�,. n,.� � +� 6t� -- w�, y I �^...s..,.,;�, � ( Y g"". ""'.-'*.�-.,-,n ENGWEERIN6 � _"' C �t . .....u......e �:L.,,,,.�„ � � � ? suavemrm �`_ . , -. . ... T � `_, �` � ��-. ..,� � , y 4 " i ENVRONMEN7AL �.... : I PUNNMV6 ��---._. I � :...� �wrav.�.�..sw�m'r.�w ,F.� ..--�_ �7--„-�'_"; P . + � �-- ""�'�--._' �, I ...w.�.�rwr�w��« -y _ � � 'F'` I' , �. r � � ._--_p��'jyC�,Au,w '&�+e,,. i ` _`- _ -_._, ! ...w...�. �_�` ;�---a-_.� . _ � �4.A „� - -`� ......w'� i � � [ ..en se�wYr � �� 3� � �rt ',._.,_,_��.�� ( a�• y `_.,_ ,_ � ,. ~~`� '�--- .. . . . �ae�e�a.ner -.�� r •'��-__- ~ � . � �uq .-'"-_88 �.I -_- a„o,n,n,acro„ � p,,' �4� �t' T.._ .... .�..y . '.. `- -�-i- 134-�� * �a.�vueo�,.`o,rr,�':--- �-__ � ""_,,,-,,,,,-..,._ ! '� `�Y. � - - �.+:' .^y-.--�`n„"°''�"' �i �- ;"�"+ykw"'"e , '� . _. _ ArelNnFnaryPUO _ i� 1 �'� � I�. ,,,,, ♦ R 1 � yt ' (( f . ' _ .. _ k v�J,-i �. ...� .._. _ ,�`_ -� ryn., '�i Me �-- 1 ., �`1 7 l... .. �� ( `a .' ': � . � v . -�. f ! � �,�� .� �'�W�+ � M\ r 33 i I �:: y �"'^ �C ' - � � , � �M.,�. s+ _ , q, >- � .JJ_ rR�. T�,. _ _ M1 i -' „ � � : o "� '�r�v° � ' " �: �. . _ �J -- =33',,� aru� #��.. � � �.� � t L awestMwiop '� � - �� , ��` :�. k� � ' - .. �.�.�. � ,-- r If�_:g• . �F �'"�� -�.. ' 4.v�+ �,4'. ...,,M'- �� ..+I_� eeo �� .��,r 11NIk � ' �� j } �.4_ : �A � '� _ _ _.�^ ..._� � � � � ( `F • .1 $• - ...�Rk'_ -I! {JYII'�Pqld �p T . , � � �, .r� 1 1 . . „ � � ....�- .. _ � �,��Y� �R�4� t! , '�! I - . � . . t --..-`-�. «..-. :�niu:rv ; ' � � + ' , -V . � , . - . ..._. ._a.i � �.� 4 '� t'� �_ue�'�_r �' � '. ._ : �I �V wo f- - �- -_-.�.'t ._�_ � _- �_ -�� ".r� w �, f� GoMs�Y�p�y.NN 1 ..��.___.- -� . -__-''a- 1 � - -."�.�r� ...�..ti � �� 'i:_ L. . � I . r.��- i� ...,.,.. Pnqmimry SNs Pl�n � � �� ` _ ! k 1 . �., _ � � " y''—(°_' ' � � , r , _ _ _ _ � ; �. — _. � a 1 i i � � '�+�'�`r--_ i' ([[ �__ _ �e , t �� I- - � -�rs w„� I~ � " � � n �ii 1 � -R�.. i . j . ��r y�.v r�-- .�_..J-_.__� �"� _� � _._1 ' -` -_ � kp.�.. --. ,;�.��.` � t..a,�r_R � - � .. �� _ -. � -� . � � � � � � _. ... _ _ �- � i ��Y� J � i • ( �� , �-� -� : '-i- _ � . i i � � ,___. �_�� i ,} '� 1d � - '� � � � � " � a. ; � �_ � �t �. �.. t "� �, t iju* I � � -1 a ri � s-.-r;�� - � � +�- .T,� . � t �- I "�`n'q- r � ta y -- r., . � . � � � ' as..�"',;,,a,�--�,� -�,"`'��'-��-�J� � �=-�-t '� "1* ---� I _` ' '� -_ � ; . , ,.,_, 7"'�*�.�ti..-_-..... :':. d.,x.,`; , { ,,.__,---ti_ • � � i 3---�-- � . _ ��. . ., `"3-r.^....:..�,.:.: -- ..,a q 4�;� r,..n-^^ nin n k«.ro rt+ �..'_ i �" � '��.� -...._J3"dR�t � � . . ... . — - _ - _ - - - ` - x '; r ..�n, , , � �,,,.,�.. """""` � _ � __".""'„"'#- _._-, J �,:.,,..., , , w�"` ..�.,.::.. � --�-�._.�-��naro�weinrwe�waartro' ` ` "�-' u•- --"�'---' � isum�ewenw�i w�s . � _..._ '�__-_- - i . � ,. . _ _''�_."'.___�..,.. NJPCS lE0EN0 N116tEi/Stl.Y3:iF.00VEL6.YEYT1VwMr L�Y't:YOGtOEaV�ttf'l�Ex<Y;tESOfTNI �---'"-��-'--'-� -'---"-"- � ouwsa.�.¢,wr wksuoie.r<,�+ts��+narw�.w� ��4`V°'car*W..a�a..�..c ew.rn. �.�� ._ _�_._._._._�..�.�...v__.` t RCD�fRr.�RBM9dRA✓P�Ii40lFRflMW.f�� MOP(N4DwUwWF1��WNW9l�v�G �bnn• � � ... 4p�4� lIAv.Y6Q11GTW,fM Ils ce'[4w�ufAfu£'�Fr, E � �SMU�LewH�•. � �uaz I .- �w"�..-...M.�# r • .• u�111'�MfF.��fl'�1�1�'I M'YP c�OK'xNMt.i(f ��t0�M4CY��1%i Wlt�f teEl�O�fD<dCRFtEMI@MN.M i°r � �.1._ - �: .. Ya. � .. VfK�MMW AV��TI�TIu1\ � � ..:.� O!'IXIMWf.11�M1il.f!N)!IY. MLKNOM�FIEo+�4ut+n .,r�.—�Ta-.. Lr.v..:'-- + nMnn�ns�wmeew�arnmw��irueer..�wuKm �^� eic.w�+.•r, -r:�J ' �.;.i . - nie�iK.nwean�i•w� aeowemio+tea.on.s<v.w�s e y+-n .._ �.�.�w+wsx.in �w.. . .. _ .-.. '� M4L R�'a.t•eA�RDIH M�Oio60o wnV td+dta � ^�� _ E+Ki.V�M1�0 rE's'flrtlF)NWf�(N1Gvnln�'{[IMUok tAKn/YSQYY<a Vi�i a aicnx.wih�ne�sw��[w.�a�+�[vo�utnm�wK6 tl s�NEitaw� aa�vavame einy9. �3.131 tb_55 � Ow�ur e ramswne++n�+u+.exexra�sv.+uw.wwfuo � �a . 1993 LaOtln 'lucN hn d�"'w�• ssa.oE�aurir<aovnrtrr,uryerrt�vanatroao[o ••a+�u. �••� <�c��cu��xs�u,00,aen..inrm�.easc,.r. .�. a,etteaa' �.�,...,� �.— _.'__ � ��e tsw s,. ie I.M1F.:. YtPoaM �' � - gy d.'i.... � s '�yOWMYmltn � - •. r ` ' �My �}3 aun+m� nmiNnln � �� vr,ubw(M.4{o�nMmzstpY,r wurn.arou � e.,s er � .� ,.. OMSlZRE 0.M/ZRE MO ua#tR 8'._!Y •y -•.•�•'. 4�L • I ^� IMT. FMoJfA:�r LO IQOaNR C��^er+.wa twu..ivvlDlWiL•nW.efYn�+v�.'.?r� R •��+utR .h.,u nn L�I �.,. �.. . ' 6.17.2G7{ 1'611d.N1 .� ,�.�a.a �,�.�.��. .�� ,�; r,.� - ;:�, z-�- !l fiRrttWtv ��.�iiw�s�+erocHm�eiti+re��.aa.. �. � � � ��IfITMI71Alf0. a�trkwctxt�af+uawuanaat9uPermcrv 0 b :'1 �. ��.�� ...,� N � c�a� Jp J� y� C ' i l e � � <�� r � W ': �� i��f�� ° 6 i ;�i� � c�� 3t � � � �$ r � � � 1� ; 4 �.. e �,{ 1 i �� y��e�, r • � �ti',�fi � Y��QFt�� 3 J $ e � � a �g� � �. g � v .�' � �-!� � < ; qt .s i � z a : � � € I ! � �¢t�rt�s� � W � N �, �f r � � � � � !_ I =��s;,� �� z � � z r � � � �� e � � t P ��"��'-� j �KE€t"�! t� �' °" � � t V/ ;,7 � S �c4i s a `c'c,j� i � ; °c�_e:•c s � ' � `-_ e "a. . <I_�:' ' 5 � C � � � ,._ 9 E . .� r. � a : � � �..� .,� �ti; , ,! ��o� N - � �,� , r � � � - - ' - ` - ` �- -, {` �� : � � � � '�..-.`. �'-��' — �� ' � � ! �s! �` �o. S h I� x x�' � �' r , +' �� r^•� s.€ �..,>,`, � t � �! �°; � P '� [" f�;�' "j�:�3� � ' � � , �� r �: -- . -.. ._.._ �I ��': � ..I � . 1'� - . �'r .. � .... � � ia: l� - ._i.f i � j , ' 1 � ' � � �r �-R^.,.. , , � �.�� r 1 � i � � � f ' a '., . ,� + +w�++rr.ui,�Yla�r 1 � � I _ e.� _ _fi.L__.��"'i . — _1 .�� +� r-.. �� i ' � +1 Y 1 , � � ' I � ' ,� � "` � ' � s �� , _ � � .. � f � � � ��, �-,--�. � r , p r.. �t .. h . .-- _ .i . � : � . . � " � � � �� , - ii � . •.+:�.� � �,�� 4 ��: �l: .�r � �- _ ___ ..._ —� f � �p ��, : ' s i I � . �� j �' �� $ S'I� g �'�, o i�� ! _.� ..�� ( �v ��,<tm �1'' � �� j I� �� .I' 9.. . ' �7J7 � � � � � + a _.1�n l� �._ ts.e.. G Jf:9 � . a t�� ` '� � � r :4' �.�:J.,�.• , � �� 1 �� -1'��„� -1 �—�'—--�� ---- � � , 1 # ' �'"`� v `� I i - _ i - z � � �F 1 i ' , I I %-v ---, � f �' :�a i y �, � ' •' �� ; �:_,a:..3 � � P � : y f � ..r � �� i�'. . _._. ...� _._ `i-+ (J i�� ^ �t�'. r bh • �� 'ic� i^s:�e :i �i� � J � �:,, ��i _.�� !'., z � � � � �yg � 4 7 i 4 4 � JL__ � � i t � 1 �� f ir d � 3i9 ,r �� : YY�f �1� �� . � �1 - ��' < I' 1 1 l' i h � x:'Y _(Y{ ,� � C _ ± .....-�l_.�� '�v.TJ'--T_"'"'— 7 �^�� i 4 �� ` `� -�1 � � � w� � + - j - Y � ' - ' �f � ~ �e � � ��` ay i�+-� �t. � '! ,� _yty�-� a _� � ` � �j� S � � :37 � t:.� i f - '+1' ,1,�.� � E Y E . t• � i1" � �, f r�' � � � �j � ;l' `�' '�� q, � ��r k � � ��b� � �.,,..� � + �� ; � �� g ►��; r;�+ a.�� ,J� � � � �s� $��B r x q� ��: � d i � 'i. Y � j � ��,' -� y9�tp gs€n yy s�� k< �� yz� )'� � -1{ !� r ...w J�- A_ ' � � T �� `g 4 8t2 � �yifg� g` '��ty �1 � y�r� � / a � I� ,�w�r�.. � -�� Y .•+ _ .. [� � g F F }3!i ��k1 AJ =� a,fix K 1 1 ! 1 ]- � -�.7�--�-- 'Jf��'�;"i� k� :�� i, . �� !,{ , QUEBEC AVE rti�__ �,�� ,I� •(� ( � i d — __ � , �_ �' , t �.a � �, �" -_..� � �„ j4 �` �'i' � � �s „� ; �.: y� ,..y'_.� r .p � �! � .._. 1 i ��I � � _ � +; •� i �z! c z / �p 2 ' ,�A O � 7 ��1 � �..� ..� � � ��, i + � � � � 4 �S �} 4 `.�. � '"�1� � r #� YY � � � � � � .� � r ;"�� t... .; �s:� �+� � 4 � 8 � s ' k �g . �„ v, , �,� ' � � i� tirawk �i � � : � � � '�`°'-� � 1 , i`��`!"�--�-,L..�.. 1-- J - � �.,.,-.: 'i _t. i! 1 !; � . r � � � � � l� i � 1 i � � ��-- � ' � �'f Ir+ t;`I� 1 y+b''Q J •�� y if''� ff�) � �GEl �EJ � I o � + �C� � s • R » � , '� �e ' p � � .b` � ��1�.C�/r �� I) ' �� --- �f 'i i .tz,_'1=_�4 I � T'�'�f � R ' �' � � j s. [`-�+� i--j. � �.�:'..._ i�;� �� °� � p p Yr . �f a►,.c i. �J.J � , � g� � S� t � �2 � � 1 ! � s + �} � is" ��8i � ��8 � � 1 =a � �� 1'� -' � i ' i ( � I �� . �k � �� )p j�� . �— Y� � i�t� j� `�5 6 OL'QLL AL61.lL.MN g�G r"r f5 _f�� __"' i , Fi C q .— i� t �3 � ��Y6 � ��tY � � > ''- __L .-'' __-__- _._..�___._"""'--^-.d..--...___ °� �F Y=�� V� �� , LAUREI AVE.___----- . --_L ___.__ � � �e r �� = �s�> �� ; ea e �� '" a�F ��i ag�� d4� ''`y, � �.��_ � ' 6 � i� -- """-e-...--.m�.,..m.....s_..-.,._ � _ . ., . . I � �� p i � I �,,,,,,� � � I � I I m � �- _ _ —_ � — -- —' � �m I I �� I �� I I ENGINEERING _ 00 � i D _— _— SURVEVING � �—�- � '\ —_ __ -- -- I I ENVIRONMENTAL �_ PIANNING �W _� I I tOOSS Va4Y`/Mw Rwe.auN fb ��.��_ � EamPniri�,Mim�wM1MH1 � I � �— --- Poom:f63iNdlft ^ � � �_ wrwwra�n9.�dn � � ° Po�aPaE �� —PEN '_ — �YLANIA AV • - - L � �.�� . ��- - EA=E��,--� -------- REvuceswEwuKn �roHrcoi �i��`� � �, ,.,: I-�— r+eeoeo rnaa s*own � seweacoesmucnorv 0 $at . �t � • P"�E^�ainei Fo -'— = n __ i ��i �' sliwo � �,`` u .. ��•roe{} � r�eeouievnauor�rvsnv�wwavEw x„ �,^:-;.,- ----- PreliminaryPUD � � �„ � I � -- � i _ ea �' - ucx, -- - _-- —o— �� I s ��'� � . ��{}r�'��.�� " �o i '' suio � � � � � E.sEMEx,—i � N _ sr �-N� �� i — 8 N � ' 8 �' CUEM i � O ' i " suwo l. s� o -- ��` �� . � IL_ s��o " soc N T° LakewestDevelopment � C � i y� � ---� _�--_r—� as � v �7 _ i� �. w wo t0 t`� N-- �____ m- exo)ecr m r �' i --'o— .,_y� ----a-_ � ,-n�s�w��.,,,� -� �----� ��a °�� Laurel POnd I G `,4'.�� _ _— — �.. 'B R I � i�p I ��e'� �- • LOGTION m � i" siiwo s� � y� —�1 �:.. - ,s. �-_ � �'fr- 1O 2s �� Golden Valley�MN I �w m sa'osu �_ �s;,——— ss � a wo�ii �� _—— __ -b——_ —> . = nSfMENL_I �� L- m F. . 16'-' I � _ .u. �I SHEET � y —�_�l � i a -- �'�'�� ---�' --�-_ ' `"'"`""� �Ip � '-0�o � -- --- Preiiminary Site Ptan I i w"�Wen F x:� SL��——— ——— . F i6 R �-w _. I .sa' I �. of I I ; I s�,ao �' =�_-1�Nym W� 1z � �=' —�—=_J � 2�=_ � f �ss i EC�'IV�' � �' _ .��.. �_-__ I Im LO ,�-. � ' —o_— � s6 — __� � � I �0�� i ' -__ � ' "ascAw� -a' � E�.—I W � � 5� � 6==—— -r . a� � `--1—=- — — SEP � _ EM 1 5� I a Wo t ,4 t— __ �' s� Z, 0 10 � � 13 ss ofl ao s e` � L t c �' I � �s - !�I � u � u°� ` L--=--_�I BY:�_� � b -- �'�. I— � : u_� ————o— y-}- GUESTPqRKNGOPiroN -- r � ' --�',, I � —�'� I � -__--____ ___ � __� � __- l - I + --� F oREou L � �`t -s 3 / .m S� �3 I n DATE REvt510N --1 �N s�UCi �� - � . I �I�U A M/]A/l0 R ove0u�loiA i � �AEtq�v Nc Wq�L ousiaUci _-_ L_ .e I' � B 0)/2C/14 RMs�Utibry Gyou� �:� � I � BUILOATwEXIqE[RRETaNwGWnIL�Fii` -_-__ -- ' �� ..J C OB/11/14 S�o�mwa�e.Mamgemen� D 09/10/10 SnePlav/CirySubm�nal 9 o TO BTRUCNMLL wnt I p P OP SEDGUEST PARKINGSTRLLSPROVIDED=t3 �� E�mrvni[c pLpNS. � p I PROPOSEDGUESTPARKINGSTREETPROVI�ED=_ I u PROOF OF PARKING STALLS PROVIDED=] �c� \ ry I F � NOTES LEGEND SINGLE FAMILY SITE DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY CITV OF GOIDEN VALLEY VEHICLES DETAIL 1. MEuSQusME RWrvoEoioiHENEMESiTEMHFooiANo �PROPosEDBiuMNOUSPnviHc cnosssrE 33tac -��+� HEREBS'CERi1FV _� ANDEXTER�ORFnCEOFBUIL0INGUNlE55 �vftOPOSEDHEAWOUTYBrtuNirv0�5FaviwG '+iP'1" ��$g�� '---_____ ` LAN,SPECIFIUilON,00.H15 NOTE�OTHE wSE,RB _ � �.w -}g_� PEPAREpHTME � uNWPSHOFF5�ER5ARERE�UIRE�TOH411lCOneaEiEWASTE ��PROPOSEUCPVCRETESiDEWPLK vnovo.s[ooe'Nsm= g.iuiAG toieE�.+ --__ �� ORUNDPAMYDIRECT CRElESUV�. N�2HA]'IAMA M10POSE�CONGaEfEPavEbtEu7 �"- ' ' "- DULYW,�NS ROFF5.510NAL J GSiRIPINGONPOWEftsBtvopiLP)(EDRIVEWiLLNEEO � l �� ENGINEERIfNDE0.iHEIAW50F OBECM4NGEDTONCCOMODATETUpNUNES.E%iING ••��•iiPIX/TC1IRB�B6-12j n�—�w��=-j ' I � TNESSATEOFMINNFSOTA. EO Bv GRiHDMG pp IS Q Q SANELnSTING�NEWSTltWESSWLLtBELAtEJ(W1TH6EWELiNE. _ — - Sit1UCTURESETBACK e. nLtCONCRETECURBSMPLLBEBFt2UNlE5SOiNERwiSENOTED. {} SINEETIIGMi �µ��A��oib wuHrts 6.15 ]0.50 DAiE 61L30f� 5 NnGEFNOUTIL1ttEA5EMEM55w�LLeEGROVIDE�NS STOPSIGN � �/� 1993 Ladder T UCk leet REGiSiMiIONNIINBER f1_ IXI�REO.ORNNFGEPNOUIWTYEqSEMENTSWILLBEPROVIOE� 4 T nLLPUBLICUTILiTE5AN0UFi00NE�t�FOOTABOVETME STREETSiGM � pF1Fpq,�oa �a Trock :].22 MIGH wqTER LEVEL OF NLL poNos. + yR y.qx � 'FOND811iFEF'SIGN � Lack lo Lock Tme I :fi.0 DMWNBV CHECKEDBY" �[ryuiHwca+ox[s�oE� �anei0e 95I L.dtr.�.Tw+�t �`\1 Steenng Angle :J3.3 � vaaKrnora�rnervrsicr� M��MurnoAivEis `t��_��f7s` i DMSIZRE DJNI2RE wo wwcour — LO looxouT i�sem�xEo�sEoasir�EFum�va[sio[�+r DAT[ PN07ECTM vaaao.seozoNwc w`o�vo� � � 6.73.2074 2011-038.1 R r+npeiea *�E"ry;:'��:.,�.�, ��' SOG 5uea+cw.oE ExinixviMv �39'�� y�r � "��_ SL stti�tevel ��,�� - --ispq�� x� � �-°_ — o SHEETNUMBER Fu�suNo[aiH[vencEtrtnc[a owNirviHErtFZw+Eowoa[arv. �� 60 ,�� .��K�oER��E � C201 SCALE �N FEET � � r � i ��,�� I �� I I i p I c m � — / W I� — / in � I ENGINEERING °O � � / I G ENVIRONMENTAL 1T1 PLANNING _ _ m � -__ _—I P_— -- EVS,INC. �T' �-' -� __ I —_ 70025 Valley View Road,Suite 140 �� O I - -_�_____ -- I �' -- � Eden Prairie,Minnesota 55344 Phone:952-646-02�6 Fax:952-646-0290 P �- �_ www.evs�ng.com EN�SYL_ANIA qV — � � � � , .. — — � PaWERPOLE �'-�_ � 55'D&U p ---�_ EASEMENT� REPLACE SIDEWALK A � __-- I NEEDED FROM STORM m LIGHi pp�E �_ SEWERCONSTRUCTION n'o_I . . �/� �� 0 SPqCEAVqILqBLEFORASIDEWq�Kyy�THIN � I � A OI �� y� I =ol "' SL/WO `\N � 22, LIGHT POLE u THE BOULEVARD Of P �-- - ENNSY�„AN,AA�E Preliminary PUD m" ---- I � .— � _Z��_ 66' N - I LO .. � LIGHTPOLE�� c� � _ o� _ _ 7' 0 9 SL/LO � N\ . 7 N 7 I 55'D&U �II � Y�}� — _ � O EASEMENT -I li; g _ 57' , �E � � CLIENT r N i ti �, °'� a �- - _ _ "` � SL/LO Tu� i c � N i • s��Wo N s� � - - _ _ 66� � ss soc 2� N Lakewest Development -N PROJECT N N F-N' ti N_ — �� _�_ 66, rn 9 '-- --II� _ 56 � 46' W� 1p 7"RIgERINGApqGE �� I Laurel Pond > � r � � � � — 56' �v �9 O _ � D � I = — '-� _ ^' 16 R I LO . LOCATION � � m � N S��Wo S� � Do � ss� L- — 56 LO 2s Golden Valley, MN � N �, �_ �_ - �� _ - . �oP Z 55'D&U I 55' S6• R�I W� �� — I � o I SHEET 56' A�"E"� —;— — �- — — _ — — — �— — _�v 56, 7^RISERINGARqGE I ° zp�o — — — — — Preliminary Site Plan i i _ _ o— T � z.r o — � — N 15 R —� ss� SL � I IN GARAGE SL 6 � ZS � — �r I SL/WO - y^' WO � I �— -_ �z- 1vr� �j � 4 ss• 2 ;' — — — �,_ _ _ � N 21 � _ _ ss� o I �� M � � �— _ I ss - LO -- — i � — —f- --_ � __ �"RISER IN GqgqGE a SEP , � � _ _ _ �h— 56� - 10 2014 ss'o8u 40, SL 5 I o Wo 14 R I - - -a— _ _ _ SL 2q rn � EASEMENT� 13 0�� ,0 56' I rv 2 o I � ' BY: --- �el 56' S6' - I 2L0 _ 56' � ' _ I -- -Ja_ r ' .. ' V . .�-� ' . � ..� . . c" 56. �_- � . i I GUEST PqqKING OP710N . . --__ - NON-S� L � ______ A .. . .. ,. - - 2 # DATE REV[SION - Vs 3 � , - _ ID E _ - - WALK SL n j - ' � �� pp A 07/?R/14 Remove0utlotA F"� REMOVEDqNDREP NON-SiRUCTU �""'�"� � y� � �"--� - LACED - ---_ L RETqINING WqLL 56' Y B 07/24/14 Revise UtiHty Layout I � x S7RUC7URAL RETAINING WALI '---_______ ,�-- ' C I _ � I � C 08/12/14 Stocmwater Management I BUILD ATOP EXISTING RETAINING WALL 3 FT T �� J D 09/10/14 Site Plan/City Submittal ELIMINATE PROPOSED NON-STRUCTURAL WALL. I PROPOSED GUEST PARKING STALLS PROVIDED=13 REFER TO STRUCTURAL PLANS. , PROPOSED GUEST PARKING STREET PROVIDED=_ i PROOF OF PARKING STALLS PROVIDED=7 \ � � I � NOTES LEGEND SINGLE FAMILY SITE DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY VEHICLES DETAIL � PROPOSED BITUMINOUS PAVING GROSS SITE= 3.37 AC �'•-�s� 1. DIMENSIONS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST TENTH FOOT AND �� T i ----_ ARE TO BACK OF CURB AND EXTERIOR FACE OF BUILDING UNLESS — PROPOSED HEAVY DUN BITUMINOUS PAVING �M,,,P q,� ��-______ � � I HEREBY CERTIFYTHAT THIS NOTED OTHERWISE. � ��__ - -�,\ PLAN,SPECIFICATION,OR NUMBER oF LOTS= 30 LOTS .�e�°�R, `� REPOAT WAS PREPARED BY ME REQUIRED DENSITV= MAX 10-12 U/AC � -��-_ 2. CONCRETE SUPPUERS ARE REQUIRED TO HAUL CONCRETE WASTE PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK PROPOSED DENSI7v= 9.�U/AC Zo10� -____ �� OR UNDER MY DIRECT AND WASH OPF-SITE �� SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A � PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENT � �'�� ' Z'�}�'� DULY L[CENSED PROFESSIONAL 3. EXISTING STRIPING ON POWERS BLVD AT LAKE DRIVE WILL NEED LOT SUMMAFtY � q'„';�.�'--�`i',",�:�—� ,!?:,� � I ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF TO BE CHANGED TO ACCOMODATE TURN LANES.EXISTWG ��. TIPOUT CURB(B6-12) �� y�?:� �� tHE STATE OF bi[NNESOTA STRIPING SHALL BE OBLITERATED BY GRINDING OR MINIMUM LO7 AREA 3478 SF O.� � _ SANDBLASTING.NEW STRIPES SHALL BE LATEX WITH 6"EDGE LINE. _ MINIMVM LOT WIDTH 36 Fi - STRUCTURE SETBACK MINIMUMLOTDEPTH 97Fi 4. ALL CONCRETE CURB SHALL BE 86-12 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. NUMBER OF LO75 3o UNI7S 6.75 20.50 David Nash {} STREET LIGHT SETBACKS _„_/�--�_�� DATE 6/13/2014 5. DRAINAGEANDUTILINEASEMENTSSHALLBEPROVIDEDAS � �gg3 Ladder T UCk feet REGISTRATIONNLJMBER 21836 REQUIRED.DRAINAGE AND UTILIN EASEMENTS WILL BE PROVIDED � STOP SIGN LAURELAVE 30 F7 T Width : 7.22 PENNSVLVANIA AVE 13 FT G..�.�.p p.wdi� OVER ALL PUBLIC UTILITIES AND UP TO ONE(1)FOOT ABOVE THE STREET SIGN Track : 722 � FRONT VARD 20 FT FROM DRIVE ISLE � yy°�(�. HIGH WATER LEVEL OF ALL PONOS. T Lock to Lock Time :6.0 � SioE vnRD 5 FT _ DRAWN BY CHECKED BY "PONDBUFFER"SIGN REARVARD �SFi Steering Angle : 33.3 � MINIMUM DRIVE ISLE(PARKWG ON ONE SIDE) 24 FT 8 TO B 199} �_�i{�Ie.R,TM1��k aa�„\"� PARK MONUMENT SIGN � DMS/ZRE DJN/ZRE ��Zv�� ZONING yyp WALKOUT DATE PROJECT# LQ LOOKOUT EXISTING ZONING 1394 MIXED USED 8 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL(R-i) ��,,_� 6.13.2014 2011-038.1 � PROPOSEDZONING PUD �s'3" ��`-��5� �� R RAMBLER Czn^1 ,,., - � $0(`a SLAB ON GRADE 129 AC. (39%) Cei") ..._.:at4" ..-_.��t�'1 EXISTING IMPEftVIOUS AREA F�--'-¢'-- PROPOgcni,nnoERVIOUSAREA 1i2AC. (52%� . .1fl�9" SHEETNUMBER SL SPLIT LEVEL NOTE'PERCETAGE OF THE SITE THAT IS PROPOSED TO BE IMPERVIOUS I (46s"� O 3O 6O FALLS UNDER THE PERCENTAGE ALLOWED IN THE REZONEO PROPERTY. ��0� TUG TUCKUNDER GARAGE SCALE IN FEET � J mo��sna� iuedmo� m � ni�' Jpues��a�:mmm � N � e £6LZ-ES9-ZS6 RObSS N�v`s�odeau„q� � � � ��8� � � ' Sb£55;�NI`�'Iooiauury�i S'^p°�d'°°'t I 946E ��»� � g � S££a1�ns��nzx.9�H-I SZ54I ZSOZ-699-Z19 � � � a'""� � .�� 3 d �uawtlo�anaa �saM a�� S 1 � 31 I H � � H � � a� �� m o �$�q� � � = Q �lN`ddWO� '8 Sl�3M - `� `� - � ' �� e `� e � �� o � � _ t�a=` s � C J Cn m tn LL -38'- _ — — � � _ — — z — I o J I O I � � � � a O Z I � Z ¢ w �O � I ��x Q � O Q a z IJ o= � I \,,�,,; ,,�,,, �o� � Q �� o Z °o w� � _ ° -; ° - wvo � � O� � w � O o .-8� �0 0 I %ii�� %ii��: o o �9 � �� O p. J- � Q P(J ..V J I J¢ LL a N L.L ll n �� Y Q y� Z iLi O O W� � � Z? Q �N�N� � _ �o I �O� � I �< W<b � mLLYk ..QQ d. � L.L� Q <n � JQ 'tiO'~'�U'Q W p m O�w I Z � I � N�m W v�wJpSS w �"-LJ tn� I > � �_J �� I ��O aJ a' ?�pNzz �- -- � � w w m� � I o OQ"'LLzz � w � �� = mN x(9�-» O I _. � 0 � C) �° U '� � I LL I v � - oo � � � � I w I i �E �;P I ;�� "' P��`' �'��L�� -' � � O � lUi U O� I �� q�qd� �,�,°'�,,7y` �� Q � o I �� o � x �+�y �^`i� � � � �� I m U � H m W ' I o]O w `G�° �� ry m I � �°�� -5;��° _ — � I �, �� I � �d�� `��'�� u ° � �� I � � I o � oo O° I a w a .;� �0�0 Qo � Q� I � � o0o J o o � �X � �� O I QN I . . W : . - U c� z � � r cv I Uau' �. O� m I QZ _ pOm :. �m O I �w I Uv�iQ . . � �� I o I L ■--- - - I I I Ir I ��\o��; � ? I / - p O I I �� \�� I I I � I � -38'- _ _ _ — — J L — _ _ _ — _ _38' _ _ — — � � I � N I � � � � Q � Q �� o z I Z Qo Jw ��° �° � I ��o''_=``a'�= o�� ° �° Zpo�hw� w� � I ��il�� %i�� Cj��p I � u 0� � � a U wU�' ov�Q � O I �"' I O � QJd Q�Sk��Q I LL . . I O§ � �¢ Jm�ii�~m� LL �b I �U v ~m � Z 3 NQNO�� Z= �'i . N�" Q Wb QO I �� C NC��Z�v=i✓=i � � � Om I � � U LL� Q <^ �d'�j�✓=i2 Z w � O U"' m� w � I O N`m Oa LL�tZZ } O wU N� � Z Qa _��--_= p� U m � NN �� r � WQ [0� �� O � � �� I = Q ij �� 00 I w mN = o Cl � � LL � o O � Q - O � —" P I U P I m 1 I � � , I � �0�0 0 0 0 0 � I Q � � � ° i �o � " w w � �� ° o � o � � �, � Q�. . �� 0� � � ° � "" � N w Z� .-_ Z I �: U(V I . 3 w I QZ J � P��`' �o �m O � I �w �l � I ' \J �' r I ��;� �� . � � ■ � .t� 5 1�� '��.,.� 1 I �4��'� —T� � � r�� '¢r��s,'y�'�'/ Q Q �/ry�� ii,; 30 � w �"5 k��J ��'�s��'�� _ � � � �m � � :�=a"��°'o�� I ii�� I I � '�VN' J'„ ��' � 2 � I ��' . I� St..nS' I I �—�� I I I .sa- _ - - - J I_ - - ,- - �...»..•.��.. Z , A �¢�t .�au�+,r...� ui Ll ' sIR4►a�4��t �•ar�aMs � s �� '��. "" I 's""'�`'��" Sl'J311H�!!d °� � � �■i� ��, �►��, � �� $� � � i�� Q � -.., . � _ _ . � ��;�� o � � � � � b S �t�.^�� 1 li�... . �y �� . A � � � �� 4 r 1',;" � ��,"" � ;i � ; �-� ; ; : � � -� � � _ �� ,� �; �� v �� ? �; � �� '° � � ._; � �� _ � � �� — � . ____�_ _ �— � �� ,� � � n � � _... , � � �� , ____ �� r ��C � ` d . _ .. . _ _ _ � � �� o � «Y"' '� �.i Y � , 1 -�� . , _ � . . _ m �� '�� - � � ��; ,� �� a � �� - �� '' _. _ _ � � a � �.� � b � �_�_ � � � � � ,� <� �� $ �� . . - - - � � � �� ° �� f �� `��`°'� � l �� '. atiy � �..' ��, �o� ,, �� s� �'P� � 'I of^�� ° � ��, `�z `�� < ']'�I{�i cJ� • �I A�� ,: p � J �� r��i� � . {. 2 � � �. ! ' �T l�i �/1� P � ' (1 �� '�'n � y�� 7��A � - I � p � .�.o pp�'" � _ �..y r� 'G. ��=---�5 � �� i� ��,� � 1 d �y"yI�r ° ��I ��I"��t , �lf,i!��r t� I IIl��IIIZY�'�'iM P� .t • i. 1 �j ��.� � 7 a� t- li` ��r � ,��,��", �� `['� �,� �,�. �'�� 1 ;� .�. �.r. „��., r `� s , r: � -_` � v,�,3'` p F, � � I ;f �� :,> � . , �i i� ;� � � i�, � � ��G, �.i M __ �;.:;:-- � 4�h� �$ 4 < � . . �'ri,i;^A:.'�� _ E�.��, _ �sY r. 1 � ..,�.�."; +�.;: ��--- �I� ��i � C2��1 0� �T Planning Department 763-593-$Q95/763-593-$109(fax) i'�w�... �� .��w`�..;.�!�!�Il�i�r«:"'w"�"ili�iu� ,,p�I�lYiim ,aii��pplillia<<-; �'fir�, ��;_�p�W��b. �`..'ui�'��N�..=��.,_:_ ._ ��,n�i,t� �I��: _. "': �_:: .��.�� '�a-; Executive Summary for Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting September 16, 2014 Agenda Item 6. A. Consideration of a Moratorium on Subdivisions and Planned Unit Developments that Include Single Family Residential Components Prepared By Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager Summary Recent single family residential subdivisions and Planned Unit Developments (PUDs) have generated enough debate surrounding their review and approval that Staff has been directed by the Council to prepare a six month moratorium in order to study various aspects of each. Specifically, the moratorium will allow Staff to examine the possibility of creating a new zoning district that establishes a larger minimum lot area, new standards for preserving "green" space when subdividing lots, the interpretation and application of clear measurements of irregular lots, the ability of the City to evaluate the potential impact on neighborhood character when reviewing subdivisions, and the use of residential PUDs to create small subdivisions that sidestep many elements of the zoning code. Attachments • Ordinance#530, tmposing a Six Month Moratorium on Subdivisions and Planned Unit Developments that include Single Family Residential Components (1 page) Recommended Action Motion to adopt Ordinance#530, Imposing a Six Month Moratorium on Subdivisions and Planned Unit Developments that include Single Family Residential Components. ORDINANCE NO. 530, 2ND SERIES AN INTERIM ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE Imposing a Six Month Moratorium on Subdivisions and Planned Unit Developments that include Single Family Residential Components The City Council of the City of Golden Valley hereby ordains: Section 1. The City Council finds that the subdivision of property zoned "single family residential" to create small subdivisions, often with irregular lots, and the use of residential Planned Unit Developments (PVDs) to create small subdivisions that sidestep many of the controls of the City's Zoning Ordinance, have the potential to negatively impact the "green" space, property values, traffic and pedestrian safety, physical environment, orderly pattern of development, and official controls in the City's single family residential neighborhoods, as well as the historic and aesthetic character of those neighborhoods. Section 2. City staff is hereby directed to undertake a study, in coordination with the Planning Commission, to determine whether, or to what extent, the City's Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances should be revised to address the foregoing concerns, including the creation of a new zoning district that establishes a larger minimum lot area; new standards for preserving "green" space when subdividing lots; new standards for the clear interpretation and application of lot measurements standards to minimize or eliminate irregular lots; the ability of the City to evaluate the potential impact on neighborhood character when reviewing subdivisions; and the use of residential PUDs to create small subdivisions that sidestep many elements of the zoning code. Section 3. For the purpose of protecting the planning process and the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of Golden Valley, and pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 462.355, subd. 4 and Golden Valley City Code, Chapters 11 and 12, a six (6) month moratorium is hereby imposed within the City of Golden Valley prohibiting the approval of any new subdivision or PUD that includes a single family residential component. During this six (6) month moratorium period, no new applications that would permit such single family residential subdivisions or PUDs shall be considered or approved by the City. This Interim Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication according to law. Adopted by the City Council this 16th day of September, 2014. /s/Shepard M. Harris Shepard M. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: /s/ Kristine A. Luedke Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk C2��I f)� �l�.i � Planning Department 363-593-8095/7b3-593-8109(fax) �` �"m�"�.4�a�' �:�.:�:„��=�'%�'�'�-'�:: .�=��-.�li� -:�...�'�,-. .��fr �r�' . . a...-��.;: _ -��.:.�il'�. -i�°�:.n„�-,�i .��' ��.:.-�' �"..�-:�-.^�:.�=�.��u ..�: Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting September 16, 2014 Agenda Item 6. B. Bottineau Transitway Update Prepared By Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager Summary The Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) for the station area planning efforts met on September 3 and discussed issues related to Traffic and Circulation and Urban Design. Topics included the possibility of incorporating parking at the Golden Valley Road station. Hennepin County and Metro Transit staff will plan to attend a future Council/Manager meeting to explore this issue further. The joint Community Working Group—made up of inembers of the Golden Valley Planning Advisory Committee and Minneapolis representatives—was scheduled to meet on Wednesday, September 10, to review a market analysis for the station areas as well as opportunities for (re)development. Staff will be able to update the Council on the content of this meeting on the 16th. In October, the topic for both the TAC and the Community Working Group will be concept alternatives for each station area. The first Workshop, or open house, has been scheduled for Wednesday, November 12, to share these concepts with the general public and to allow the consultant team to receive feedback. Recommended Action Motion to receive and file Bottineau Transitway Update. C��"�1 D� ��`� �t� �� CityAdministration/Council 763-593-8003/763-593-8109(fax) Executive Summary For Action Golden Valley City Council Meeting September 16, 2014 Agenda Item 6. C. Authorization to Sign First Amendment to Addendum to Purchase Agreement with The Investor Group, LLC for 2241 Legend Drive Prepared By Thomas D. Burt, City Manager Summary At the June 3, 2014 City Council meeting, the Council authorized the City Manager to sign the purchase agreement for the sale of 2241 Legend Drive to The Investor Group, LLC. The purchase agreement stipulated that $20,000 will be refunded to the buyer if certain exterior improvements were made within two months of the closing. The closing took place on July 10, 2014, and the deadline fell on September 10, 2014. The buyer has completed some of the interior work but not the building exterior improvements. The Investor Group, LLC has requested an extension in order to provide additional time to complete the exterior improvements. Staff has negotiated an agreement that will extend the deadline to October 5, 2014. The agreement covers the work which needs to be completed such as: exterior siding replacement or repainting, exterior window replacement, landscaping and rebuilding the exterior deck. The agreement does provide that if the buyer is successful in completing the items in a timely manner he will be refunded $20,000 of the purchase price. If he fails to complete the improvements by the deadlines agreed to he will forfeit $5,000 for each deadline missed. The buyer as agreed to the terms outlined in the amended addendum to the purchase agreement. Attachments • First Amendment to Addendum to Purchase Agreement - 2241 Legend Drive (2 pages) • Addendum to Purchase Agreement dated June 24, 2014 (1 page) Recommended Action Motion to authorize the City Manager sign the First Amendment to Addendum to Purchase Agreement with Investor Group, LLC for 2241 Legend Drive. ADD��U��O�U�GH��G�E�� This form approved b�y fhe Minn�Association at R�ALI'�R�, � � vtfilch disclakns any liab[Itty adsfng out of us+a or mtsuae of th�fonm, LEADERS �2Q11 MPnneaata Aesociatlon of RERLTOR�,Es�na�MI� sa�tfiT��7Y� 1. Date o6isalis 2. Page 3. Addendum#o Pum.hasa Agreement between part[es,dated �ii ssn� ,20 is ,p��ining to the 4. purchase and sale of the property at ��*s _ Ls,�►a� nxi.�e 8. aolet�n��v�l� 11� 5s�3Z � - . 8. in tha event af a canfiict b�twsen thfs Addendum and any other provislon of tf�e Purchase Agreement,the language 7. in this Addendum shsll�avern. a►nar�=� Rs�oxas�a�rs �o �c�►ss ��r 8. T'!�e follc�vriag +az� additiaaal reQuirem�ats th�E maaet be oo�plated or adhered to hy the $. �'er: 1) v�J.th.int taro tz) mo�s,thw a# dat. o! cloait�s 10. �a� Itll ast�rior sidiay� a�utl.l 1a� raQlaaec! or repai��t�d ar3.th painC tbat ri.il leu�t w'i�;haut �slia� for a� le�is� tea (l0) yMar�� 11. (b) A11 exterfor aia8oas ahaii b� raplaa�dj (a) � e�cterior deck shaZl be rebs�ilt= �ad 12, id) A].l thc� yard �d yard plaatiags sl�all � repiaated. if aacess�rY, �ad kapt ia pood eo�3iCioa duri�y tha p�riod of o�wa�rslsii? �'sY �tYax. 13. All o� the �bo�v� item� awab�rad tal. (b3. ta) aad td) ahaii b� oo�pls�ed withia tcca��o 14, t�) mvnths of the �.�e o� alaairs�. x! thsy are cc�iotad rrJ,thin tbst tfinetat�l� and �ha yard m�;iataiaad ia �ood co�ditii+o�a duria�, t2s�,t pariod o� ti�, allowiaQ !or aa�! ir�. aoasidaria� the on qois� coaets7sotioa a,ti tha �+ra�ertY, $3d,000.00 0! t� $SSO,�04.00 purcb►aae priaa shail be s�aafund+sd to b�uyar. t�" a�o,y o! tihese items are aot cc�piat� or 16. =dhsred tv, to th+b aatiafactiuu oP the C�.1Cy. �aid $�0.00o eball lozfai� to th� city. 33 T�e fatflrfor a�rk �l�all bs ca�i�t� o�i.Cliia 6 �aonth� of the d�tw of closia� ia such 17. aan�iftioaa tba,� �hs hauso and othar fa�rovsa�ats raquireQ herein, i�,cludi� the follo�via� 7tas'd voork, maY be marr:ated �sad so��' �o aa snd user. 1$. 4) The Lausi o�s Ch� Drc�rtY mnat be re��irea �s a�t�Li�und abav�e. =t na,y aot bs 19. r��' if at a11, until all. �s,�sets o� Eiie liti�atic� hsvs beaa ct�l��e+�, Thia sals i� ou e�t AS =S bssie. Seller �a discio��d tL� h3r�tory of liti�r�i�ioa �a,nd 20. �iaeeria� �por�s vo�csraiag �he �sxo�artY• �Yer �a��naw'ledges the attached gxgclosure St�.tamen�, 21. abtaahad docnme�te a�l the opport�sa,ity to r�vi�a all of t2�e es��saerir�y reports osi t� pron�rr�y �ohich hav�er baen aollacted by the Citiy. 22. 5) Hu,yar to build a tvro t'ao� h3Qh. dirt buzm alas� tha PraDerty Iute an8 sa:aeet Cs�ek. 8uyer a�,n�d Cit�y ta agras an saope u� waark �rior to clos�. 23, THIS �GR�.B� IS BBSJJlCT '1'�> APPRCV]iL SY T�iR CTTY 24. �r,s abli �tiou ta Si porfox=n u�dar thi�r Swrc]�aga ��semwsst ier co��ix�mst u�p�on Huy�r=�� pr�, secoipt of a camsitmeat �raaa a titi�► insuraaca co�any to iaau+� a titl,e iasur�ca poliay that 3$ acc�ptabla to S�syer ax�4 �1aat insura� oves ax ��,�.nat �ha rf sk rs],atad to thc� �, 26. or�pol�a� 13tii�atinax regarclir� t� gi'o�sty bet�een tbe City o� Qoldoa Va11al► aad 8tav�n asid €�a�dra� 7�azQi. 27. 28. Tlxs additi+os�i rec�uire�at� nr term� cc�itaiaeB iss thi� add�� survive ths aloais� ar�, ,, givis� of 4:he d.ad so that thaY maY be eaforcad there�,fter 29. 3U. � 4,.,�..r � � �I� i� � -��r� �`� `�•�T - _7/�„ �rt�! 3i. �sau� .�.. � �F � (Dat {BuYe►') Iave6tor =,x,C pa�� ...�, 32. �e+,.,,�-�,�.� .'�� (Sek�r) (Date) (euyefj (�1 33. TI�lIS tS.�'LEQA�.LY B�EI+#tNNt�GG�17'l��'E3��,i�+'�'��;,�t3��T �, 34. !F'itQU DEStI��L�G�l.�i`AX A�VlC�,CANSU�.T�1�►lf��d�"E P� ��,t [.� MN-APA($111) . FIRST AMENDMENT TO ADDENDUM TO PURCHASE AGREEMENT 2241 Legend Drive, Golden Valley, MN This Agreement arnending Addendum to Purchase Agreement ("Adclendum") is made diis 10�' day of September, 2014 by and betcveen t�ie City of Golden Valley ("City") and Investor Group, LLC (`Buyer") WHEREAS tlie Purctiase Agreement dated April 22, 2014 lias an Addendum dated,june 24, 2014 wliicli provides adclitional requirements to t�ie Buyer dealing wit�i improvements to t.�ie building exterior wliicli were to be completed wit�un two (2) monttis of t�ie date of closing. WH�REAS ttiis matter closed on July 10, 2014 and two (2) monttis thereafter falls on September 10, 2014. NOVV,THER�FORE, ttie parties wish to amend t�ie Addendum as follows: 1. By no later t�ian Septeinber 12, 2014, Buyer stiall apply to t�ie City of Golden Valley for a full building permit relating to windows, siding, deck, etc. 2. By September 19, 2014, Buyer shall complete tlie exterior siding replaceinent or repainting t�iat will last wit�iout peeling for at least ten (10) years. 3. By Septeinber 30, 2014, Buyer shall rebuild tlie exterior deck and have it. fully completed. 4• By October 5, 2014, Buyer shall complete dle replacement of t�ie exterior windows. 5. Ttie y�u-cl and yard planting s�iall be replanted if necessary and kept in good condition continuously during t�ie period of ownersliip by tlie Buyer. 6. If Bu}�er is successful in compleling all of tlie items 1 tlirough 5 above to tlie satisfaclion of t�ie City, City Staff agrees to recommend to tlie City Council ttiat it refund Twenty Tliousand and 00/100 Dollars ($20,000.00) of tkie purchase price to t�ie Buyer; liowever, t�ie City shall have no obligation to do so. If Buyer fails to miss any of tlie future deadlines referenced in Paragraphs 1 t�irough 4 above, Buyer shall forfeit Five Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($5,000.p0) of t�ie possible amount to be refunded for each deadline missed. No furtlier extensions of tliese deadlines will be considered by ttie City�. This Ainendinent to Addenduin to Purchase Agreement is subject to approval by t�ie City Council. First Amendme�it to ADDENDt1M TO Purchase Agreemeiit 2241 I,e�;end Drive,Goldeu Valley,MN Page 1 of 2 The additional requiretnents or terins contained in diis Ainendment to Addendum to Purcliase Agreeinent. survive tlie closing ancl giving of t�ie deed so tliat t�iey inay be enlorced tliereaftcr. Dated: ___!_______________________ CITY Or GOLDEN VALLEY By• --------------------------- Tliomas D. Burt, City Manager Dated: __ September 10, 2014 ,-.--._�..,,. ;____. .. ------------------ INV�STO�t GROLIP, C � . ,. � � �,. .. . . ,. �. —.r, :B : ---.__._ _.�'.... - ,.,, , y ---------- -- `---- -�=---- �i Araya .__. ... .`� 000090/31`200`l/1934888 1 First Amendment to ADD�NDUM TO Purchase Agreement 2`l41 Legend llrive,Golden Valley,MN P�e 2 of 2