Loading...
2019-06-050 fu (:L �-4 mac., Golden Valley • Crystal • New Hope AGENDA JOINT WATER COMMISSION June 5, 2019 —1:30 pm City Council Conference Room Golden Valley City Hall 1. Call to Order 2. Approval of Revised Minutes — May 1, 2019 ;Approved 3-0) 3. Receive and File 2018 Financial Report and Management Letter (Virnig) 4. Approve 2020-2024 Capital Improvement Projects Resolution #19-03 (Virnig) (Approved 3-0) 5. Approve 2020 General Fund Budget Resolution #19-04 (Virnig) (Approved 3-0) 6. TAC Update May 23, 2019 (Kakach) 7. Other Business Next Scheduled Meeting July 3, 2019 8. Adjournment This document is available in alternate formats upon a 72-hour request. Please call 763-593-8006 (TTY: 763-593-3968) to make a request. Examples of alternate formats may include large print, electronic, Braille, audiocassette, etc. JOINT WATER COMMISSION MINUTES Golden Valley - Crystal - New Hope Meeting of May 1, 2019 The Golden Valley —Crystal — New Hope Joint Water Commission (JWC) meeting was called to order at 1:30 pm in the City of Golden Valley Council Chambers. Commissioners Present Anne Norris, City Manager, Crystal Kirk McDonald, City Manager, New Hope Tim Cruikshank, City Manager, Golden Valley Staff Present Joe Hansen, Utilities Supervisor, Golden Valley R.J. Kakach, Engineer, Golden Valley Randy Kloepper, Utilities Superintendent, Crystal Dave Lemke, Operations Manager, New Hope Marc Nevinski, Physical Development Director, Golden Valley Mark Ray, Director of Public Works/City Engineer, Crystal Tim Kieffer, Public Works Maintenance Supervisor, Golden Valley Sue Virnig, Finance Director, Golden Valley Bernie Weber, Public Works Director, New Hope Approval of Revised Minutes — March 13, 2019 Moved by McDonald seconded by Cruikshank to approve the revised minutes of the March 13, 2019 Joint Water Commission Meeting. Motion carried. Approve Golden Valley Reservoir (North and South) Repairs Staff reported on the Golden Valley Reservoir Project. Staff stated the reservoir was down for maintenance and this was the opportune time for other inspections. A third party was performing inspections in order to install solar panels and staff was replacing mud valves and drain valves in the reservoir. Staff solicited a quote from KLM Engineering Inc which included to first rehabilitate and seal the cracking on the inside of reservoir. By doing this first, will aid the contractor to better inspect the towers to develop plans and specifications for the repairs at a later date. Staff received a proposal from KLM Engineering, Inc. to perform the repairs on the North and South Ground Storage Reservoirs. Staff reported these repair services will be provided for $25,418 which is within budget. KLM also proposed to provide design and engineering services for the project. Staff is requesting to begin crack sealing and professional services immediately. Then will provide a detailed proposal to go out for bids later this year. Staff recommends approval of the KLM proposal which is within the $300,000 budgeted amount. Moved by Cruikshank seconded by McDonald to approve the Golden Valley Reservoir (North and South) Repairs with KLM Engineering, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $25,418. Approve Elevated Tower No 1 Inspections. Staff stated an inspection was completed on Tower No 1 approximately two to three years ago and the recommendation was to complete interior work, exterior pressure wash, and touch up paint as needed. The intent of the repairs is to protect the structure form corrosion for an additional seven to ten years. This will include spot coating repairs below the high-water line on the interior, complete removal and f Joint Water Commission May 1, 2019 Page 2 of 3 replacement of the interior coatings above the high-water line, power wash the exterior of the tower, and spot coating repairs on the exterior of the tower. This is considered minimum maintenance as the Commission plans to take Tower No 1 to replacement term. Towers typically require repainting once every 20 years. Staff is recommending to begin the design phase and determine a detailed, long-term schedule so that the tower is not down over a winter period. The Joint Water Commission has budgeted $663,000 in the 2019 Capital Improvement project for this project (#15-002). Moved by McDonald seconded by Cruikshank to approve the Elevator Tower No I Recondition Services with KLM Engineering in the amount not to exceed $46,700. Motion carried. TA_ C Update Staff reported on the following: Elevated Towers Final painting will take place in spring. Reservoir Work 65-17: Golden Valley Project was awarded to Keys well Drilling, Keys ordering parts Project will place place in fall/winter of 2019 Crystal pump and motor replacement design ongoing KLM provided a formal proposal for repairs at Golden valley Reservoir, crack filling Valve Replacement Crystal will use 2019 dollars toward replacement near their pump house this year. Tower Painting KLM provided proposal for Golden Valley Tower Painting in 2020. Miscellaneous North Tower Altitude valve replacement will take place this spring, parts have been ordered, working to hire contractor. Staff working with Ziegler CAT on switch gear in Golden Valley generator Working with SEH on water model Update Capital Improvement Projects Items TAC worked to update CIP for June JWC Meeting Approval. Other Business No other business at this time. Adjournment Moved by McDonald seconded by Norris to adjourn meeting. Motion carried. Chair Norris adiourned the meetine at 1:30 om. ATTEST: �" Sue Schwalbe, Recording Secretary Chai nne Norris Joint Water Commission Memo June 5, 2019 lam, Agenda Item #3 3. Receive and File 2018 Financial Report and Management Letter Prepared by Sue Virnig, Golden Valley Finance Director Summary Virnig will review and answer any inquiries regarding the 2018 Financial Statements and 2018 Management Letter. Attachments 2018 Financial Statements (32 pages) 2018 Management Report (4 pages) Recommended Action Review and file the 2018 Financial Statements and 2018 Management Letter I:Woint Water CommissionUM Memos12019-06-051Agenda Item #3.docx GOLDEN VALLEY — CRYSTAL — NEW HOPE JOINT WATER COMMISSION Financial Statements and Supplemental Information Year Ended December 31, 2018 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK GOLDEN VALLEY — CRYSTAL — NEW HOPE JOINT WATER COMMISSION Table of Contents INTRODUCTORY SECTION Page BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS I FINANCIAL SECTION INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT 2-3 BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Government -Wide Financial Statements Statement of Net Position 4 Statement of Activities 5 Fund Financial Statements Balance Sheet — Governmental Funds 6 Statement of Revenue, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances — Governmental Funds 7 Statement of Revenue, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances — Budget and Actual — General Fund 8 Notes to Basic Financial Statements 9-15 OTHER REQUIRED REPORTS Independent Auditor's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and on Compliance and Other Matters Based on an Audit of Financial Statements Performed in Accordance With Government Auditing Standards 16-17 Independent Auditor's Report on Minnesota Legal Compliance 18 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK INTRODUCTORY SECTION THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Commissioner Anne Norris Kirk McDonald Tim Cruikshank GOLDEN VALLEY — CRYSTAL — NEW HOPE JOINT WATER COMMISSION Board of Commissioners Year Ended December 31, 2018 Position Chairperson Vice Chairperson Secretary/Treasurer -1- Governmental Unit City of Crystal City of New Hope City of Golden Valley THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK FINANCIAL SECTION THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK MMKR CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT To the Board of Commissioners and Management Golden Valley— Crystal —New Hope Joint Water Commission REPORT ON THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PRINCIPALS Thomas A. Karnowski, CPA Paul A. Radosevich, CPA William J. Lauer, CPA James H. Eichten, CPA Aaron J. Nielsen, CPA Victoria L. Holinka, CPA/CMA Jaclyn M. Huegel, CPA We have audited the accompanying financial statements of the governmental activities and each major fund of the Golden Valley — Crystal — New Hope Joint Water Commission (the Commission) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2018, and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the Commission's basic financial statements as listed in the table of contents. MANAGEMENT'S RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America; this includes the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. AUDITOR'S RESPONSIBILITY Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement. An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor's judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the Commission's preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Commission's internal control. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinions. (continued) -2- Malloy, Montague, Karnowski, Radosevich & Co., P.A. 5353 Wayzata Boulevard • Suite 410 • Minneapolis, MN 55416 • Phone: 952-545-0424 • Fax: 952-545-0569 • www.mmkr.com OPINIONS In our opinion, the financial statements referred to on the previous page present fairly, in all material respects, the respective financial position of the governmental activities and each major fund of the Commission as of December 31, 2018, the respective changes in financial position thereof, and the budgetary comparison for the General Fund for the year then ended, in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. OTHER MATTERS Required Supplementary Information Management has omitted the management's discussion and analysis that accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require to be presented to supplement the basic financial statements. Such missing information, although not a part of the basic financial statements, is required by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board, who considers it to be an essential part of financial reporting for placing the basic financial statements in an appropriate operational, economic, or historical context. Our opinion on the basic financial statements is not affected by this missing information. Other Information Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming opinions on the financial statements that collectively comprise the Commission's basic financial statements. The introductory section, as listed in the table of contents, is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. The introductory section has not been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, accordingly, we do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on it. Prior Year Comparative Information We have previously audited the Commission's financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2017, and we expressed unmodified audit opinions on the respective financial statements of the governmental activities and each major fund in our report dated April 24, 2018. In our opinion, the partial comparative information presented herein as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017 is consistent, in all material respects, with the audited financial statements from which it has been derived. OTHER REPORTING REQUIRED BY GovERNMENTAUDITING STANDARDS In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated May 24, 2019 on our consideration of the Commission's internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, grant agreements, and other matters. The purpose of that report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over financial reporting and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the effectiveness of the Commission's internal control over financial reporting or on compliance. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards in considering the Commission's internal control over financial reporting and compliance. W4&*7,, W0x4V,, kl4A,�w4,Ai, A. Minneapolis, Minnesota May 24, 2019 -3- BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS GOLDEN VALLEY — CRYSTAL — NEW HOPE JOINT WATER COMMISSION Statement of Net Position as of December 31, 2018 (With Partial Comparative Information as of December 31, 2017) Governmental Activities 2018 2017 Assets Cash and investments $ 6,153,841 $ 5,074,672 Due from other governmental units 654,299 896,598 Prepaids 30,372 31,896 Capital assets Not depreciated 1,215,506 1,031,477 Depreciated, net of accumulated depreciation 9,348,641 9,632,739 Total capital assets, net of accumulated depreciation 10,564,147 10,664,216 Total assets $ 17,402,659 $ 16,667,382 Liabilities Accounts and contracts payable $ 17,600 $ 26,528 Deposits payable 8,915 8,915 Due to other governmental units 502,859 500,681 Unearned revenue 133,515 36,000 Total liabilities 662,889 572,124 Net position Net investment in capital assets 10,564,147 10,664,216 Restricted for capital improvements 3,520,717 2,762,426 Restricted for emergency water supply 1,700,000 1,700,000 Unrestricted 954,906 968,616 Total net position 16,739,170 16,095,258 Total liabilities and net position $ 17,402,659 $ 16,667,382 See notes to basic financial statements SS GOLDEN VALLEY — CRYSTAL — NEW HOPE JOINT WATER COMMISSION Statement of Activities Year Ended December 31, 2018 (With Partial Comparative Information for the Year Ended December 31, 2017) Program expenses Water distribution Water purchases Administration and maintenance Depreciation Total program expenses Program revenues — water distribution Charges for services Member assessments Capital grants and contributions Total program revenues — water distribution Net program revenue �., General revenues Investment income Rental income Total general revenues Change in net position Net position Beginning of year End of year See notes to basic financial statements -5- Governmental Activities 2018 2017 $ 6,868,799 $ 6,382,395 557,607 645,095 393,848 389,541 7,820,254 7,417,031 7,238,368 6,826,748 1,000,000 923,000 8,238,368 7,749,748 418,114 332,717 88,434 — 137,964 143,787 226,398 143,787 644,512 476,504 16,095,258 15,618, 754 $ 16,739,770 $ 16,095,258 GOLDEN VALLEY - CRYSTAL - NEW HOPE JOINT WATER CONBHSSION Balance Sheet Governmental Funds as of December 31, 2018 (With Partial Comparative Information as of December 31, 2017) Assets Cash and investments Due from other governmental units Prepaids Total assets Liabilities Accounts and contracts payable Deposits payable Due to other governmental units Unearned revenue Total liabilities Fund balances Improvement Capital Projects General Fund Fund Total Governmental Funds 2018 2017 $ 931,147 $ 5,222,694 $ 6,153,841 $ 5,074,672 654,299 - 654,299 896,598 30,372 - 30,372 31,896 $ 1,615,818 $ 5,222,694 $ 6,838,512 $ 6,003,166 $ 15,623 $ 1,977 $ 17,600 $ 26,528 8,915 - 8,915 8,915 502,859 - 502,859 500,681 133,515 - 133,515 36,000 660,912 1,977 662,889 572,124 Nonspendable for prepaids 30,372 - 30,372 31,896 Restricted for capital improvements - 3,520,717 3,520,717 2,762,426 Restricted for emergency water supply - 1,700,000 1,700,000 1,700,000 Unassigned 924,534 - 924,534 936,720 Total fund balances 954,906 5,220,717 6,175,623 5,431,042 Total liabilities and fund balances $ 1,615,818 $ 5,222,694 $ 6,838,512 $ 6,003,166 Amounts reported for governmental activities in the Statement of Net Position differ because: Fund balances - governmental funds $ 6,175,623 $ 5,431,042 Capital assets used in governmental activities are not financial resources and, therefore, are not reported as assets in governmental funds. Cost of capital assets 18,881,808 18,588,029 Less accumulated depreciation (8,317 661) (7,923,813) Net position of governmental activities $ 16,739,770 $ 16,095,258 See notes to basic financial statements -6- GOLDEN VALLEY - CRYSTAL - NEW HOPE JOINT WATER COMMISSION Statement of Revenue, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances Governmental Funds Year Ended December 31, 2018 (With Partial Comparative Information for the Year Ended December 31, 2017) Revenue Member assessments Charges for services Nonoperating surcharge Construction charges Other revenue Investment income Rental income Total revenue Expenditures Current Water purchased Insurance Utilities Labor Maintenance Professional services Administrative charges paid to members Rent remitted to members Capital outlay Total expenditures Net change in fund balances Improvement Capital Projects Total Governmental Funds 2018 2017 $ 7,228,610 $ - $ 7,228,610 $ 6,817,269 9,758 - 9,758 9,479 - 1,000,000 1,000,000 923,000 5,710 82,724 88,434 - 137,964 - 137,964 143,787 7,382,042 1,082,724 8,464,766 7,893,535 6,868,799 - 6,868,799 6,382,395 51,831 - 51,831 53,709 193,820 - 193,820 183,926 40,203 - 40,203 38,034 51,807 - 51,807 54,862 12,295 - 12,295 12,112 39,033 - 39,033 37,917 137,964 - 137,964 143,787 - 324,433 324,433 1,233,359 7,395,752 324,433 7,720,185 8,140,101 (13,710) 758,291 744,581 (246,566) Fund balances Beginning of year 968,616 4,462,426 5,431,042 5,677,608 End of year $ 954,906 $ 5,220,717 $ 6,175,623 $ 5,431,042 Amounts reported for governmental activities in the Statement of Activities are different because: Net change in fund balances - governmental funds $ 744,581 $ (246,566) Capital outlays are reported as expenditures in governmental funds, but are allocated over the estimated useful lives of the capital assets as depreciation expense in the Statement of Activities. Capital outlay Depreciation expense Change in net position of governmental activities See notes to basic financial statements -7- 293,779 1,112,611 (393,848) (389,541) $ 644,512 $ 476,504 GOLDEN VALLEY - CRYSTAL - NEW HOPE JOINT WATER COMMISSION Statement of Revenue, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances Budget and Actual General Fund Year Ended December 31, 2018 (With Partial Comparative Information for the Year Ended December 31, 2017) 2018 2017 Original and Over (Under) Final Budget Actual Final Budget Actual Revenue Charges for services $ 8,283,985 $ 7,228,610 $ (1,055,375) $ 6,817,269 Nonoperating surcharge - 9,758 9,758 9,479 Other revenue Investment income - 5,710 5,710 - Rental income - 137,964 137,964 143,787 Total revenue 8,283,985 7,382,042 (901,943) 6,970,535 Expenditures Current Water purchased 6,739,860 6,868,799 128,939 6,382,395 Insurance 60,000 51,831 (8,169) 53,709 Utilities 240,000 193,820 (46,180) 183,926 Labor 100,000 40,203 (59,797) 38,034 Maintenance - 51,807 51,807 54,862 Professional services 100,000 12,295 (87,705) 12,112 Administrative charges paid to members 44,125 39,033 (5,092) 37,917 Rent remitted to members - 137,964 137,964 143,787 Capital outlay 1,317,000 - (1,317,000) - Total expenditures 8,600,985 7,395,752 (1,205,233) 6,906,742 Net change in fund balances $ (317,000) (13,710) $ 303,290 63,793 Fund balances Beginning of year 968,616 904,823 End of year $ 954,906 $ 968,616 See notes to basic financial statements -8- GOLDEN VALLEY — CRYSTAL — NEW HOPE JOINT WATER COMMISSION Notes to Basic Financial Statements December 31, 2018 NOTE 1— SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES A. Organization The Golden Valley — Crystal — New Hope Joint Water Commission (the Commission) was formed under the authority of Minnesota Statutes § 471.59. Its purpose is to provide for the operation and ownership of a water supply system in and for the Commission. The Commission is governed by a Board of Commissioners, which consists of three members, one from each of the participating cities. Original construction costs for the water supply system were allocated to the member cities based on percentages agreed upon in the Joint Powers Agreement. All subsequent operating and maintenance costs are apportioned to each member city based on water usage. All property acquired under this agreement is owned by the member cities in proportion to the amount of construction costs each city pays. The accounting policies of the Commission conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America as applicable to governmental units. B. Reporting Entity A joint venture is a legal entity resulting from a contractual agreement that is owned, operated, or governed by two or more participants as a separate and specific activity subject to joint control, in which the participants retain either an ongoing financial interest or an ongoing financial responsibility. The Commission, as described above, is considered a joint venture of the cities of Golden Valley, Crystal, and New Hope, and is included as such in their financial statements. As required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, these financial statements include the Commission (the primary government) and its component units. Component units are legally separate entities for which the primary government is financially accountable, or for which the exclusion of the component unit would render the financial statements of the primary government misleading. The criteria used to determine if the primary government is financially accountable for a component unit includes whether or not the primary government appoints the voting majority of the potential component unit's board, is able to impose its will on the potential component unit, is in a relationship of financial benefit or burden with the potential component unit, or is fiscally depended upon by the potential component unit. Based on these criteria, there are no component units required to be included in the Commission's financial statements. C. Government -Wide Financial Statements The government -wide financial statements (Statement of Net Position and Statement of Activities) display information about the reporting government as a whole. These statements include all of the financial activities of the Commission. The Statement of Activities demonstrates the degree to which the direct expenses of a given function or segment are offset by program revenues. Direct expenses are those that are clearly identifiable with a specific function or segment. Program revenues include: 1) charges to customers or applicants who purchase, use, or directly benefit from goods, services, or privileges provided by a given function or segment; 2) operating grants and contributions; and 3) capital grants and contributions. Other internally directed revenues are reported as general revenues. -9- NOTE 1— SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED) The government -wide financial statements are reported using the economic resources measurement focus and the accrual basis of accounting. Revenues are recorded when earned and expenses are recorded when a liability is incurred, regardless of the timing of related cash flows. Grants and similar items are recognized as revenue when all eligibility requirements imposed by the provider have been met. Generally, the effect of interf ind activity is eliminated from the government -wide financial statements. D. Fund Financial Statement Presentation The accounts of the Commission are organized on the basis of funds, each of which is considered a separate accounting entity. The operations of each fund are accounted for with a separate set of self -balancing accounts that comprise its assets, liabilities, fund equity, revenue, and expenditures. Separate fund financial statements are provided for governmental funds. Major governmental funds are reported as separate columns in the fund financial statements. The resources of the Commission are accounted for in the following two major governmental funds: General Fund — This fund is the Commission's primary operating fund. It accounts for all financial resources of the general government, except those required to be accounted for in another fund. Improvement Capital Projects Fund — This fund is used to account for financial resources set aside for the construction of infrastructure improvements. Governmental funds are reported using the current financial resources measurement focus and the modified accrual basis of accounting. With this measurement focus, only current assets and current liabilities are generally included on the Balance Sheet. Operating statements of this fund present increases (revenue and other financing sources) and decreases (expenditures and other financing uses) in fund balances. Under this basis of accounting, transactions are recorded in the following manner: 1. Revenue Recognition — Revenue is recognized when it becomes measurable and available. "Measurable" means the amount of the transaction can be determined and "available" means collectible within the current period or soon enough thereafter to be used to pay liabilities of the current period. For this purpose, the Commission considers revenues to be available if collected within 60 days after year-end. Grants and similar items are recognized when all eligibility requirements imposed by the provider have been met. All significant revenue sources are considered susceptible to accrual. 2. Recording of Expenditures — Expenditures are generally recorded when a liability is incurred; however, expenditures are recorded as prepaid for approved disbursements or liabilities incurred in advance of the year in which the item is to be used. Capital asset acquisitions are reported as capital outlay expenditures in the governmental funds. E. Budget A budget for the General Fund is adopted annually on the modified accrual basis of accounting. Budgetary control is at the fund level. All appropriations lapse at year-end. F. Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements, in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, required management to make estimates that affect the amounts reported in the basic financial statements. Actual results could differ from these estimates. -10- NOTE 1— SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED) G. Cash and Investments Cash and temporary investments include balances from all funds that are combined and invested to the extent available in various securities as authorized by state law. Investments are generally stated at fair value, except for certain external investment pools stated at amortized cost. Investment income is accrued at the Balance Sheet date. When applicable, the Commission categorizes its fair value measurements within the fair value hierarchy established by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The hierarchy is based on the valuation inputs used to measure the fair value of the asset. Level 1 inputs are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets; Level 2 inputs are significant other observable inputs; and Level 3 inputs are significant unobservable inputs. Debt securities classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy are valued using a matrix pricing technique. Matrix pricing is used to value securities based on the securities' relationship to benchmark quoted prices. H. Receivables The Commission utilizes an allowance for uncollectible accounts to value its receivables; however, it considers all of its current receivables to be collectible. I. Prepaids Certain payments to vendors reflect costs applicable to future accounting periods and are recorded as prepaids, which are recorded as expenditures/expenses at the time of consumption. J. Capital Assets Capital assets are capitalized at historical cost, or estimated historical cost if purchased or constructed. Donated capital assets are recorded at their estimated acquisition value at the date of donation. The Commission defines capital assets as those with an initial, individual cost of $5,000 or more, which benefit more than one fiscal year. The cost of normal maintenance and repairs that do not add to the value of the asset or materially extend asset lives is not capitalized. Capital assets are recorded in the government -wide financial statements, but are not reported in the fund financial statements. Capital assets are depreciated using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives. Since assets are generally sold for an immaterial amount or scrapped when declared as no longer fit or needed by the Commission, no salvage value is taken into consideration for depreciation purposes. Useful lives used range from 5 to 40 years for the distribution system and 10 to 30 years for storage facilities. Construction in progress is not depreciated. K. Risk Management The Commission is exposed to various risks of loss related to torts: theft of, damage to, and destruction of assets; error and omissions; and natural disasters. The Commission participates in the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust (LMCIT), a public entity risk pool for its general property, casualty, and other miscellaneous insurance coverages. The LMCIT operates as a common risk management and insurance program for a large number of cities in Minnesota. The Commission pays an annual premium to the LMCIT for insurance coverage. The LMCIT agreement provides that the LMCIT will be self-sustaining through member premiums and will reinsure through commercial companies for claims in excess of certain limits. Settled claims have not exceeded this commercial coverage in any of the past three years. There were no significant reductions in insurance coverage during the current fiscal year. -11- NOTE 1— SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED) L. Net Position In the government -wide financial statements, net position represents the difference between assets, deferred outflows of resources (if any), liabilities, and deferred inflows of resources (if any). Net position is displayed in three components: • Net Investment in Capital Assets — Consists of capital assets, net of accumulated depreciation, reduced by any outstanding debt attributable to acquire capital assets. • Restricted Net Position — Consists of net position restricted when there are limitations imposed on its use through external restrictions imposed by creditors, grantors, or laws or regulations of other governments. • Unrestricted Net Position — All other net position that does not meet the definition of "restricted" or "net investment in capital assets." The Commission applies restricted resources first when an expense is incurred for which both restricted and unrestricted resources are available. M. Fund Balance Classifications In the fund financial statements, governmental funds report fund balance in classifications that disclose constraints for which amounts in those funds can be spent. These classifications are as follows: • Nonspendable — Consists of amounts that are not in spendable form, such as prepaid items, inventory, and other long-term assets. • Restricted — Consists of amounts related to externally imposed constraints established by creditors, grantors, or contributors; or constraints imposed by state statutory provisions. • Committed — Consists of internally imposed constraints that are established by resolution of the Board of Commissioners. Those committed amounts cannot be used for any other purpose unless the Board of Commissioners removes or changes the specified use by taking the same type of action it employed to previously commit those amounts. • Assigned — Consists of internally imposed constraints. These constraints consist of amounts intended to be used by the Commission for specific purposes, but do not meet the criteria to be classified as restricted or committed. In governmental funds, assigned amounts represent intended uses established by the governing body itself or by an official to which the governing body delegates the authority. • Unassigned — The residual classification for the General Fund, which also reflects negative residual amounts in other funds. When both restricted and unrestricted resources are available for use, it is the Commission's policy to first use restricted resources, and then use unrestricted resources as they are needed. When committed, assigned, or unassigned resources are available for use, it is the Commission's policy to use resources in the following order: 1) committed, 2) assigned, and 3) unassigned. The Commission's fund balance policy includes goals for maintaining minimums of $900,000 of unassigned fund balance in the General Fund and $1,000,000 of fund balance restricted for capital projects in the Improvement Capital Projects Fund. -12- NOTE 1— SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED) N. Prior Period Comparative Information The financial statements include partial prior year comparative information. Such information does not include all of the information required or sufficient detail to constitute a presentation in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Accordingly, such information should be read in conjunction with the Commission's financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2017, from which such partial information was derived. NOTE 2 — CASH AND INVESTMENTS A. Deposits Cash balances of the Commission may maintain deposits as authorized by Minnesota Statutes. Custodial credit risk is considered the most significant risk associated with deposits, which is the risk that in the event of a bank failure, the Commission's deposits may be lost. Minnesota Statutes require that all deposits be protected by federal deposit insurance, corporate surety bonds, or collateral. The market value of collateral pledged must equal 110 percent of the deposits not covered by federal deposit insurance or corporate surety bonds. Authorized collateral includes treasury bills, notes, and bonds; issues of U.S. government agencies; general obligations rated "A" or better; revenue obligations rated "AA" or better; irrevocable standard letters of credit issued by the Federal Home Loan Bank; and certificates of deposit. Minnesota Statutes require that securities pledged as collateral be held in safekeeping in a restricted account at the Federal Reserve Bank or in an account at a trust department of a commercial bank or other financial institution that is not owned or controlled by the financial institution furnishing the collateral. The Commission has no additional deposit policies addressing custodial credit risk. At year-end, the carrying amount of the Commission's deposits and the balance on the bank records were both $0. At December 31, 2018, all deposits were fully covered by federal deposit insurance. B. Investments At year-end, the Commission held investments in the Minnesota Municipal Money Market (4M) Fund of $660,272, and in the 4M Plus Fund of $5,493,569. These funds are external investment pools regulated by Minnesota Statutes not registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) that follow the regulatory rules of the SEC. The Commission's investments in these funds are measured at the net asset value per share provided by the pool, which is an amortized cost method that approximates fair value. The 4M Fund has no restrictions on withdrawals; however, the 4M Plus Fund requires funds be invested for a 14-day period prior to withdrawal, subject to a penalty equal to seven days of interest on funds withdrawn prior to the 14-day restriction period. Investments are subject to various risks, the following of which are considered the most significant: Custodial Credit Risk — For investments, this is the risk that in the event of a failure of the counterparty to an investment transaction (typically a broker -dealer) the Commission would not be able to recover the value of its investments or collateral securities that are in the possession of an outside party. The Commission does not have a formal policy addressing this risk, but typically limits its exposure by purchasing insured or registered investments, or by the control of who holds the securities. -13- NOTE 2 — CASH AND INVESTMENTS (CONTINUED) Credit Risk — This is the risk that an issuer or other counterparty to an investment will not fulfill its obligations. Minnesota Statutes limit the Commission's investments to direct obligations or obligations guaranteed by the United States or its agencies; shares of investment companies registered under the Federal Investment Company Act of 1940 that receive the highest credit rating, are rated in one of the two highest rating categories by a statistical rating agency, and all of the investments have a final maturity of 13 months or less; general obligations rated "A" or better; revenue obligations rated "AA" or better; general obligations of the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency rated "A" or better; bankers' acceptances of United States banks eligible for purchase by the Federal Reserve System; commercial paper issued by United States corporations or their Canadian subsidiaries, rated of the highest quality category by at least two nationally recognized rating agencies, and maturing in 270 days or less; Guaranteed Investment Contracts guaranteed by a United States commercial bank, domestic branch of a foreign bank, or a United States insurance company, and with a credit quality in one of the top two highest categories; repurchase or reverse purchase agreements and securities lending agreements with financial institutions qualified as a "depository" by the government entity, with banks that are members of the Federal Reserve System with capitalization exceeding $10,000,000; that are a primary reporting dealer in U.S. government securities to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York; or certain Minnesota securities broker -dealers. The Commission does not have a formal policy that further restricts investing in specific financial instruments. Concentration Risk — This is the risk associated with investing a significant portion of the Commission's investment (considered 5.0 percent or more) in the securities of a single issuer, excluding U.S. guaranteed investments (such as treasuries), investment pools, and mutual funds. The Commission does not have a formal policy that limits the concentration of investments. Interest Rate Risk — This is the risk of potential variability in the fair value of fixed rate investments resulting from changes in interest rates (the longer the period for which an interest rate is fixed, the greater the risk). The Commission does not have a formal policy limiting the duration of investments. NOTE 3 — CAPITAL ASSETS Capital asset activity for the year ended December 31, 2018 is as follows: Beginning Completed Ending Balance Additions Retirements Construction Balance Capital assets, not depreciated Construction in progress $ 1,031,477 $ 293,779 $ — $ (109,750) $ 1,215,506 Capital assets, depreciated Distribution system 14,341,592 — — 109,750 14,451,342 Storage facilities 3,214,960 — — — 3,214,960 Total capital assets, depreciated 17,556,552 — — 109,750 17,666,302 Less accumulated depreciation on Distribution system (5,101,344) (368,956) — — (5,470,300) Storage facilities (2,822,469) (24,892) — — i.2,847,361.i Total accumulated depreciation (7,923,813) (393,848) — — 8� 31t 7,661) Net capital assets, depreciated 9,632,739 (393,848) — 109,750 9,348,641 Total capital assets, net $ 10,664,216 $ (100,069) $ — $ — $ 10,564,147 Depreciation expense is included in the water distribution program in the govermnent-wide financial statements. -14- NOTE 4 — RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS The Commission transacts business with the three member cities affiliated through common ownership of the joint venture. A. Revenue and Related Receivables The Commission charges the member cities for water costs, system maintenance and improvement, administrative expenditures generated in the ordinary course of business, and a nonoperating surcharge. Revenue from charges to the member cities in 2018, along with any remaining receivable, is as follows: Improvement General Fund Capital Projects Receivable at Revenue Fund Revenue December 31, 2018 City of Golden Valley $ 3,063,028 $ 418,000 $ 275,313 City of Crystal 1,902,705 270,800 203,697 City of New Hope 2,272,635 311,200 175,289 $ 7,238,368 $ 1,000,000 $ 654,299 B. Expenditures and Related Payables The member cities charge the Commission for expenditures incurred or services performed on the Commission's behalf, as well as an administrative charge. In addition, the Commission remits certain rental revenues received to the member cities. Expenditures made to the member cities in 2018, along with any liability remaining at year-end, are as follows: City of Golden Valley City of Crystal City of New Hope NOTE 5 — COMMITMENTS Expenditures $ 65,455 99,437 248,629 Rental Included in Revenues Payables at Remitted December 31, 2018 $ 45,988 $ 6,085 45,988 12,814 45M8 960 $ 413,521 $ 137,964 $ 19,859 At December 31, 2018, the Commission is committed to various contracts for capital improvements. The Commission's remaining commitment under these contracts is $533,827. -15- THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK r-'� OTHER REQUIRED REPORTS THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK PRINCIPALS Thomas A. Karnowski, CPA Paul A. Radosevich, CPA MMKRWilliam J. Lauer, CPA James H. Eichten, CPA C E R T I F I E P P U B L I C Aaron J. Nielsen, CPA ACCOUNTANTS Victoria L. Holinka, CPA/CMA Jaclyn M. Huegel, CPA INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING AND ON COMPLIANCE AND OTHER MATTERS BASED ON AN AUDIT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS To the Board of Commissioners and Management Golden Valley — Crystal — New Hope Joint Water Commission We have audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, the financial statements of the governmental activities and each major fund of the Golden Valley — Crystal — New Hope Joint Water Commission (the Commission) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2018, and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the Commission's basic financial statements, and have issued our report thereon dated May 24, 2019. INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements, we considered the Commission's internal control over financial reporting (internal control) to determine the audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances for the purpose of expressing our opinions on the financial statements, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Commission's internal control. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the effectiveness of the Commission's internal control. A deficiency in internal control exists when the design or operation of a control does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct, misstatements on a timely basis. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the Commission's financial statements will not be prevented, or detected and corrected, on a timely basis. A significant deficiency is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control that is less severe than a material weakness, yet important enough to merit attention by those charged with governance. Our consideration of internal control was for the limited purpose described in the first paragraph of this section and was not designed to identify all deficiencies in internal control that might be material weaknesses or significant deficiencies. Given these limitations, during our audit we did not identify any deficiencies in internal control that we consider to be material weaknesses. However, material weaknesses may exist that have not been identified. (continued) -16- Malloy, Montague, Karnowski, Radosevich & Co., P.A. 5353 Wayzata Boulevard • Suite 410 - Minneapolis, MN 55416 • Phone: 952-545-0424 • Fax: 952-545-0569 • www.mmkr.com COMPLIANCE AND OTHER MATTERS As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the Commission's financial statements are free from material misstatement, we performed tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements, noncompliance with which could have a direct and material effect on the determination of financial statement amounts. However, providing an opinion on compliance with those provisions was not an objective of our audit and, accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. The results of our tests disclosed no instances of noncompliance or other matters that are required to be reported under Government Auditing Standards. PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT The purpose of this report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the effectiveness of the Commission's internal control or on compliance. This report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards in considering the Commission's internal control and compliance. Accordingly, this report is not suitable for any other purpose. Minneapolis, Minnesota May 24, 2019 -17- MMKR CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT ON MINNESOTA LEGAL COMPLIANCE To the Board of Commissioners and Management Golden Valley — Crystal — New Hope Joint Water Commission PRINCIPAY S Thomas A. Karnowski, CPA Paul A. Radosevich, CPA William J. Lauer, CPA James H. Eichten, CPA Aaron J. Nielsen, CPA Victoria L. Holinka, CPA/CMA Jaclyn M. Huegel, CPA We have audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, the financial statements of the governmental activities and each major fund of the Golden Valley — Crystal — New Hope Joint Water Commission (the Commission) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2018, and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the Commission's basic financial statements, and have issued our report thereon dated May 24, 2019. MINNESOTA LEGAL COMPLIANCE The Minnesota Legal Compliance Audit Guide for Cities, promulgated by the State Auditor pursuant to Minnesota Statutes § 6.65, contains seven categories of compliance to be tested: contracting and bidding, deposits and investments, conflicts of interest, public indebtedness, claims and disbursements, miscellaneous provisions, and tax increment financing (TIF). Our audit considered all of the listed categories, except that we did not test for compliance in the areas of public indebtedness and TIF, because the Commission has issued no public indebtedness and does not utilize TIF. In connection with our audit, nothing came to our attention that caused us to believe that the Commission failed to comply with the provisions of the Minnesota Legal Compliance Audit Guide for Cities. However, our audit was not directed primarily toward obtaining knowledge of such noncompliance. Accordingly, had we performed additional procedures, other matters may have come to our attention regarding the Commission's noncompliance with the above referenced provisions. PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT The purpose of this report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of compliance and the results of that testing and not to provide an opinion on compliance. Accordingly, this report is not suitable for any other purpose. Minneapolis, Minnesota May 24, 2019 -18- Malloy, Montague, Karnowski, Radosevich & Co., P.A. 5353 Wayzata Boulevard • Suite 410 • Minneapolis, MN 55416 • Phone: 952-545-0424 • Fax: 952-545-0569 • www.mmkr.com THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK MMKR CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS May 24, 2019 To the Board of Commissioners and Management Golden Valley — Crystal — New Hope Joint Water Commission PRINCIPALS Thomas A. Karnowski, CPA Paul A. Radosevich, CPA William J. Lauer, CPA James H. Eichten, CPA Aaron J. Nielsen, CPA Victoria L. Holinka, CPA/CMA Jaclyn M. Huegel, CPA The following is a summary of our audit work, key conclusions, and other information that we consider important or that is required to be communicated to the Board of Commissioners, administration, or those charged with governance of the Golden Valley — Crystal — New Hope Joint Water Commission (the Commission). OUR RESPONSIBILITY UNDER AUDITING STANDARDS GENERALLY ACCEPTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND GOVERNMENTAUDITING STANDARDS We have audited the financial statements of the governmental activities and each major fund of the Commission as of and for the year ended December 31, 2018. Professional standards require that we provide you with information about our responsibilities under auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and Government Auditing Standards, as well as certain information related to the planned scope and timing of our audit. We have communicated such information to you verbally and in our audit engagement letter. Professional standards also require that we communicate to you the following information related to our audit. PLANNED SCOPE AND TIMING OF THE AUDIT We performed the audit according to the planned scope and timing previously discussed and coordinated in order to obtain sufficient audit evidence and complete an effective audit. AUDIT OPINION AND FINDINGS Based on our audit of the Commission's financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2018: • We have issued an unmodified opinion on the Commission's basic financial statements. The Commission has elected not to present management's discussion and analysis, which accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have determined necessary to supplement, although not required to be a part of, the basic financial statements. Our opinion on the Commission's basic financial statements is not affected by this missing information. • We reported no deficiencies in the Commission's internal control over financial reporting that we considered to be material weaknesses. • The results of our testing disclosed no instances of noncompliance required to be reported under Government Auditing Standards. • We reported no findings based on our testing of the Commission's compliance with Minnesota laws and regulations. Malloy, Montague, Karnowski, Radosevich & Co., P.A. 5353 Wayzata Boulevard • Suite 410 • Minneapolis, MN 55416 • Phone: 952-545-0424 1 Fax: 952-545-0569 • www.mmkr.com Golden Valley — Crystal — New Hope Joint Water Commission May 24, 2019 SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Page 2 Management is responsible for the selection and use of appropriate accounting policies. The significant accounting policies used by the Commission are described in Note 1 of the notes to basic financial statements. No new accounting policies were adopted, and the application of existing policies was not changed during the year. We noted no transactions entered into by the Commission during the year for which there is a lack of authoritative guidance or consensus. All significant transactions have been recognized in the financial statements in the proper period. CORRECTED AND UNCORRECTED MISSTATEMENTS Professional standards require us to accumulate all known and likely misstatements identified during the audit, other than those that are clearly trivial, and communicate them to the appropriate level of management. There were no misstatements detected as a result of audit procedures that were material, either individually or in the aggregate, to each opinion unit's financial statements taken as a whole. ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES AND MANAGEMENT JUDGMENTS Accounting estimates are an integral part of the financial statements prepared by management and are based on management's knowledge and experience about past and current events and assumptions about future events. Certain accounting estimates are particularly sensitive because of their significance to the financial statements and because of the possibility that future events affecting them may differ significantly from those expected. The most sensitive estimate affecting the financial statements is management's estimate of depreciation expense based on the estimated useful lives of the assets. We evaluated the key factors and assumptions used by management to develop these estimates in determining that they are reasonable in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The financial statement disclosures are neutral, consistent, and clear. DIFFICULTIES ENCOUNTERED IN PERFORMING THE AUDIT We encountered no significant difficulties in dealing with management in performing and completing our audit. DISAGREEMENTS WITH MANAGEMENT For purposes of this report, a disagreement with management is a financial accounting, reporting, or auditing matter, whether or not resolved to our satisfaction, that could be significant to the financial statements or the auditor's report. We are pleased to report that no such disagreements arose during the course of our audit. Golden Valley — Crystal — New Hope Joint Water Commission Page 3 May 24, 2019 MANAGEMENT CONSULTATIONS WITH OTHER INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS In some cases, management may decide to consult with other accountants about auditing and accounting matters, similar to obtaining a "second opinion" on certain situations. If a consultation involves application of an accounting principle to the Commission's financial statements or a determination of the type of auditor's opinion that may be expressed on those statements, our professional standards require the consulting accountant to check with us to determine that the consultant has all the relevant facts. To our knowledge, there were no consultations with other accountants. MANAGEMENT REPRESENTATIONS We have requested certain representations from management that are included in the management representation letter dated May 24, 2019. OTHER AUDIT FINDINGS OR ISSUES We generally discuss a variety of matters, including the application of accounting principles and auditing standards, with management each year prior to retention as the Commission's auditors. However, these discussions occurred in the normal course of our professional relationship and our responses were not a condition to our retention. OTHER MATTERS We were not engaged to report on the introductory section, which accompanies the financial statements but is not required supplementary information. Such information has not been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, accordingly, we do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on it. CLOSING We would be pleased to further discuss any of the information contained in this report or any other concerns that you would like us to address. We would also like to express our thanks for the courtesy and assistance extended to us during the course of our audit. The purpose of this report is solely to provide those charged with governance of the Commission, management, and those who have responsibility for oversight of the financial reporting process required communications related to our audit process. Accordingly, this report is not suitable for any other purpose. A. Minneapolis, Minnesota May 24, 2019 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Joint Water Commission Memo -� June 5, 2019 Agenda Item #4 4. Approve the 2020-2024 Capital Improvement Program Prepared by Sue Virnig, Golden Valley Finance Director Summary The 2020-2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) has been reviewed by the Technical Advisory Committee. Attachments Resolution 19-03 Approving the 2020-2024 Capital Improvement Program (1 page) 2020-2024 Capital Improvement Program (1 page) Recommended Action Approve the 2020-2024 Capital Improvement Program Resolution #19-03 IAJoint Water CommissionUM Memos\2019-06-051Agenda Item #4.docx Resolution 19-03 June 5, 2019 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION APPROVING 2020-2024 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM WHEREAS, the Technical Advisory Committee reviewed the proposed 2020-2024 Capital Improvement Program; and WHEREAS, the Golden Valley- Crystal — New Hope Joint Water Commission has reviewed the 2020-2023 Capital Improvement Program at the June 5, 2019 meeting; and WHEREAS, financing for projects outlined in the 2020-2024 Capital Improvement Program will be reviewed each year and provided for by current approved budget. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Golden Valley- Crystal — New Hope Joint Water Commission approves the 2020-2024 Capital Improvement Program. Anne Norris, Chair ATTEST: Kirk McDonald, Vice Chair The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Commissioner and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: none; whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Chair and their signature attested by the Vice Chair. Resolution 19-03 June 5, 2019 Member McDonald introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION APPROVING 2020-2024 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM WHEREAS, the Technical Advisory Committee reviewed the proposed 2020-2024 Capital Improvement Program; and WHEREAS, the Golden Valley- Crystal — New Hope Joint Water Commission has reviewed the 2020-2023 Capital Improvement Program at the June 5, 2019 meeting; and WHEREAS, financing for projects outlined in the 2020-2024 Capital Improvement Program will be reviewed each year and provided for by current approved budget. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Golden Valley- Crystal — New Hope Joint Water Commission approves the 2020-2024 Capital Improvement Program. Kirk McDonald, Vice Chair The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Cruikshank and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Cruikshank, 'McDonald, Norris and the following voted against the same: none; whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Chair and her signature attested by the Commissioner. A B 1 2 3 Joint Water Commission C Projects 6 Replace Trunk Valve (2017, 2019, 2021) ($60,000/valve) 7 SCADA Updates 8 _ Security for All Towers, and Pump Stations 9 �\'Effluent Meters in Reservoir LO Replace Swamp coolers Ll Install 48" Gate Valve at GV Reservoir (2021) .2 umps/Controls/Piping/VaIves at Pump Station (2019 & .3 ynspect and Clean Reservoirs (Crys 2017, GV 2021) .4 Water Supply Plan .5 JWC Trunk Main Testing .6 0 umps/Controls/Piping/VaIves at Pump Station (2019, 2 .7 Replace flow meters C P--cs"Z Al - .8 eservoir Repairs .9 Valve Exerciser !0 Pump Houses !1 Pipes and Valves 2 Golden Valley Road (CSAH 66) Project 3 42nd Avenue (CSAH 9) Project A TOWERS: Tower Inspections Tower Rehabilitation Interior & Exterior structure repairs to Elevated Tower Blast and Repaint (2020) Interior & Exterior structure repairs to Elevated Tower Blast and Repaint (2018) New Tower (1.5 MG) Hillsboro New Tower New Tower AL Security for All Towers, and Pump Stations Joint Water Commission Memo June 5, 2019 Agenda Item #5 S. Approve 2020 General Fund Budget Resolution #19-04 Prepared by Sue Virnig, Golden Valley Finance Director Summary At this meeting, the Joint Water Commission will consider the resolution adopting the 2020 Budget. Staff has included actual numbers for 2017 and 2018 along with the adopted and estimated budget for 2019. Attachments Resolution 19-04 2020 Budget (1 Page) Recommended Action Motion to approve the 2020 General Fund Budget, Resolution 19-04 1:1Joint Water CommissionWWC Memos12019-06-051Agenda Item #5.docx 000 CO cO Co N m m N CO V N M Cs O Cl) CO o 00 0 00 o rn O)vO N M�aO Gf N m O O O O O O O O V OMOO CO N O O CM ) CO v C) n N O N N 0) P m n m 00 C9IL us o o o Co Ci Co N M N Co It N m M O O O Cl) O O 0 0 00 O O O O 0 0 O 0 ODpOp 00 M,� a) CO C� O C 0 Cl C 0 O C O) V (A 07 r R CoV' COO M O O N W t` N ,41O V N N CO N U? CO N COto y W •- C6NejC6 » 0 0 o O n CO O (A CA CV O R N Cl) 0 0 1U Cl) 0 O 00 O O 0 O 00 O O O O o 0 rno)mo 'V Co V CO LU C O n O O O O O O O CM Co 0) O Co IL v Co M O O N Ow N M O OV N N O Cq N O V Cl) LO a ��10� 0o0 OCiCo N m m N CO .- V N M rn Co m V O0p o O m Co 0 0 Co N O m Co j0 3 r O W CA 0 M 7 t` (O O N N V N N O Iq CO q 10 CO C V N M M O W CA N M Co U) 0 Co M O N a CO n C7 N N 06 69 ER CA CCO O) m f0 w �NM CU m t` O � M m N O) O n U N C M CA N t` m CO N CO C, W N � M m M t• V M O M m Co O In M Co v 0)Co N Co t. N Q QDD CO m � M N N 0 C CU N C CD N y 2 y f6 = c W `o y y LD m F N m Y N CA Z 0 3 o a�i dCL o ` CO y C C O 0 N f0 N q, Cb Q w N E E E O L N E O O W c `Co U U U to O > w A « Ca CO w 0 E c U E U Ca o a ` — c O O CC Ca F r`O• y w U .0 7 Q D L « N Q N L CO O y w TN idp Z C E O 00 �` V y d L W ❑ `a m ❑ > mm 2 wo wEi u O ri �. N Jd m C OC 2) o o Coa c a C/%Cw W 0 .2 Z > N O, N U V O C V1 aCQ- > D W O Z > CL O w '(/) O LL Q N LL y L> y 0 L rN+ O Q Q 7 2 "' LL C, .A. 2 2 y c �J O �r Lil� ��,mm JID wa c m F a o.LL E F o, D J :2 O �E J� CD W CL C O .� a y N 2 7 0 W = w E F «� F y w` O O O LL Co d W W w .d+ W X CO y = Co O Ca w w Z> Lu 0)�� r U' W �j c d U CO O U' WUUU m B Joint Water Commission TAC Meeting Thursday May 23, 2019 11:00 AM 1 1. Project Updates a. Elevated Towers + Final painting will take place in spring. b. Valve Work c. Reservoir Work ■ 65-17: GV Project was awarded to Keys Well Drilling. • Keys ordering parts. • Project will take place in fall/winter of 2019. ■ Crystal pump and motor replacement design ongoing. • KLM provided a formal proposal for repairs at GV reservoir, crack filling. + Proposal was approved at May JWC meeting. d. Valve Replacement + Crystal will use 2019 dollars towards replacement near their pump house this year. e. Tower Painting • KLM provided proposal for Golden Valley tower painting in 2020. • Proposal was approved at May JWC meeting. f. Miscellaneous ■ North Tower Altitude valve replacement will take place this spring, parts have been ordered, working to hire contractor. ■ Joe working with Ziegler CAT on switch gear in GV generator • Working with SEH on water model update. g. CIP Items TAC worked to update CIP for June JWC meeting approval. C:1UserslsschwalbelAppDatalLocal\Microsoft\WindowslTemporary Internet Files\Content.Outlookl6WUOGAUGIJWC TAC Meeting Minutes_5.23.19 (003).docx Joint Water Commission TAC Memo June 5, 2019 Agenda Item #6 6. Receive and File the May 23, 2019 TAC Meeting Minutes Prepared by R.J. Kakach Joint Water Commission Technical Advisory Committee Summary Kakach will review and update Commissioners on the May 23, 2019 TAC Meeting Attachments TAC Meeting May 23, 2019 (1 page) Recommended Action Review and file the May 23, 2019 TAC Meeting Minutes IAJoint Water CommissionUM Memos12019-06-051Agenda Item #6.docx