2020 Pet Leash Ordinance - Community Input Report Pet Leash Ordinance
COMMUNITY INPUT REPORT
I
city of
go l d e n��
valley
Contents
Overview...... ...................................................................... ..................2
Question1 ........................................................... .................................3
Question2..... .............................................. .........................................3
Question3.......... .............................................................. .......... ..........4
Question4.......... .............................................................. .......... ..........4
Appendix A. Social Media Reach & Engagement....................... ......... .... .....49
Pet Leash Ordinance Community Input Report Page 1
ave ry j eW
Soliciting public input was a major component of the Golden Valley City Council's consideration of
updating the City's pet leash ordinance.
Staff solicited input from the community through an online survey regarding the following areas:
• mandatory pet leashing
• minimum length of leashes
To promote the survey, the City published three website news stories about the issues being
considered by the City Council. All information included links to the online survey.
The City further promoted the survey through social media posts on Facebook and Twitter.
Survey
The City published a survey for residents to give their input on the topic. The survey was live Feb 18,
2020—Dec 1, 2020 and garnered 652 responses.
social Media Outreacl
The City posted information and reminders about the survey three times on Facebook and three times
on Twitter between Feb 18, 2020 and March 24, 2020. See Appendix A for reach and engagement
details for each post.
City of Golden Valley,MN-Local Government
published by Loomly®•February 18 O
The City Council would Eke input from residents regarding potential updates to Golden Valley's
pet leashing ordinance.Thecurrent ordinance allows pets to be off-leash in some public spaces if
controlled by voice commands.
https://www.goldenvalleymn.gov/.../counciI-looking-to../
GOLDENVALLEYMN.GOV
Cityof Golden Valley,MN:City Council Looking To Update Pet Leashing Ordinance
1,466 469 City of Golden Valley, MN .
People Reached Engayemens
@GalclenValleyMN
00911
Residents have one week left to share feedback on a
U5 Like Q Comment proposed updated pet leashing ordinance. The short
survey can be taken online.
Comment as City of Golden Valley,MN-Loral goldenvalleymn.gov/newsarchive/in...
4:44 PM•Mar 24,2024• Loomly
Ill View Tweet activity
Q t_ Q u
Pet Leash Ordinance Community Input Report Page 2
1. Do you agree Golden Valley should have an ordinance requiring all pets be
leashed at all times in Golden Valley public spaces?
Of the 646 respondents, 451 (70 percent) answered yes and 195 (30 percent) answered no.
Answer Count
Yes 451
No 195 30 '
2. Do you think 6 feet is an acceptable maximum leash length for all pets in
Golden Valley public spaces?
Of the 646 respondents, 391 (61 percent) answered yes and 255 (39 percent) answered no.
Answer
Yes
i No _..
39%
Pet Leash Ordinance Community Input Report Page 3
3. If not, what maximum leash length would you consider acceptable?
Of the 217 responses to this question, the most popular answers were 10 feet, 12 feet, and 15 feet.
47.0
45.0
40.0
35.0
30.0
�S
25.0
22
20.0 �$
15.0 13 14
10.0
7 7
s
0,0 0 1 _ 3 4 5 6 S 9 10 12 15 16 20 21 24 25 30 50 100 1000 90OW99999
4. Do you have other comments?
This question was open-ended and gathered no statistical data. See responses below.
The current law is sufficient. No change is needed.
This ordinance should be promoted as a way to keep all pets and humans safe, but especially
as a way to protect people who are scared of dogs from undue stress of dogs approaching
them
There are rumors of a requirement that dogs must be on LEATHER LEASH. If this were true,
that would be extremely excessive requirement with no good reason.
Pet Leash Ordinance Community Input Report Page 4
I have read recent numerous comments on Nextdoor's website by Golden Valley dog owners
objecting to leashing their dogs. Somehow they feel it's their right to allow their dog(s) to
roam freely as they walk through our neighborhoods only depending on voice commands to
control their dog(s). Audible sounds do not offer physical restrainment...a nylon/leather
leash does.
In my opinion, no dog will respond 100% of the time to an owner's command therefore, it's
time to remove that risk and require dogs be leashed when walked on publicly owned
property. I love dogs, I've owned dogs and would never consider walking them without them
being on a 6' leash...I never used a retractable leash either .
There's a certain arrogance off-leash supporters have...e.g. their dog(s) can do no
wrong/harm. Well, maybe they'd like to come over and replace the flowers their off-leash
dog trampled in my gardens!
Please vote to require all dogs to be leashed. If people don't like it, they can move...there will
always be others who will want to move into our community!
Keep dogs leashed, even "good dogs" can be unpredictable.
Consider providing waste bags for dog owners. Also, should close dog parks when waste is
not picked up.
I'd be very happy to have dogs on restricted-length leashes. Too often "voice command"
doesn't prevent them from running into the street in front of my car or running onto my front
lawn to relieve themselves. Asking an owner to keep their dogs close to them while walking
on public property is the safest and most neighborly thing to do. And although I don't have a
dog now, I have in the past and always kept them on restricted leashing on a walk (not
retractable).
Thank you.
We always leash our dogs in public spaces with a 6 ft leash. That said, this is an owner
(training) issue, not dogs. Owners need to be more responsible for their dog(s) while around
other people and/or dogs. Joggers who let their 'voice command' dogs run loose (and up into
other people's property) run the risk of ruining good will toward dogs. (It's rude.) So a 15 ft
rule should apply to 'voice command' dogs in public places. MOST owners ARE responsible
while walking their pets. It's a few bad apples (inconsiderate owners) that ruin it for everyone
else. Please don't make Golden Valley an unfriendly community. Thank you!
Dog Owners should be allowed to have their dog on an electronic collar in place of a leash
and be allowed to have their dog off leash in their own yard without a fence or in ground
Pet Leash Ordinance Community Input Report Page 5
fence if the dog is voice trained and the owner is outside with them. I also disagree with the
requirement for a yard sign for inground fencing.
Keep it as it is, I like it just the way the laws are
This is a complete waste of time to satisfy the complaints of those in North Tyrol. Can we
focus on something else with our time.
I feel retractable leashes need to be allowed although certainly dogs should be under control
of their owner and perhaps within 6-10 feet of their owner when when approaching people
or other dogs. A standard 6 ft leash is not long enough for me to be able to walk safely in the
street when my dog walks up on snow banks
I heard Eft leather leash, that is to much. Leather is to heavy for small dogs.
I am not sure about the maximum length, but for a small dog like a dachshund, 6' seems too
short. I don't like retractable leashes, because the owners do not have control of their dog.
As a dog owner and a teenager I have an important stance on this. Somedays playing with my
dog in my front yard or running around the culdesac my dog is the best stress reliever from
constant school work and anxiety. As a nanny, I know that dogs can run up to kids and scare
them but it's important forchildren to know how to handle dogs too and the most harm these
dogs will do is say hello. Please consider the words of your cities youth when making this
Retractable and off leash should be included as options
I think the current ordinance is just fine. As to leash length I think there is a difference
between small dogs Le. Under 15 Ibs and large dogs.
Leash should be retractable and allowed to be more than 6 feet long. Dogs on private
property can be off tether if there's owner supervision and/or have an electric fence.
I think a leash length of 8 or 9 feet would be reasonable - 6 feet seems too short. (Question 4
didn't allow anything except a single number response.) I did a quick internet search, and
found very little on reasonable leash length - and not written by leash or pet supply sellers.
One question might be how the 6 foot length was established, and is it reasonable? After
reading the old ordinance, and the proposed revisions, I agree there has been some ill-
informed commentary, and think the ordinance is reasonable, perhaps with a minor change
to the leash length. Good luck!
Dogs should be on leash in all public spaces, but no need for a maximum leash length. That
seems quite unnecessary.
Pet Leash Ordinance Community Input Report Page 6
6' or shorter is reasonable when near other people and pets but when no other people are
nearby the extending leashes are reasonable. People just need to have their pets under
control when near others. Not all pets or people are comfortable with dogs approaching
them.
My husband suffered a dog bite over christmas, from a dog that the owner said was friendly.
Yes I feel all dogs should be leashed. I have had plenty of dogs run up to me when I was
walking, I am afraid of large dogs. Most time voice commands do not work.
No
What about retractable leashes?
These often expand beyond 6ft.
In my own yard, I should not have to tether my dog. Micro managed!! We are never going to
live in a perfect world. Just because other cities are doing it, doesn't mean Golden Valley has
to follow!!!! Length of leash depends on the size of the dog and how well you can control
them. 6 Ft is fine though (makes the ordinance easier to understand and follow and enforce if
needed), and taking out the voice command is fine too. People do not always know what
voice command
really is.
having a hard time with this web sight....
It's for the dog's safety.
No
We have no issues in our neighborhood with dogs being off leash in the park. Most neighbors
have dogs and frequently build community in the park while playing with dogs and socializing
with each other. We are strongly against this ordinance and if we were interested in
something like this why not just live in Minneapolis...
If there is a leash law, then there should be dog parks easily assessable throughout GV.
I feel dogs that are controlled under voice command and e-leashes should be exempt for the
ordinance.
Thank you for addressing this public concern!
Pet Leash Ordinance Community Input Report Page 7
I would like to see the city reexamine pet laws/ordinances more broadly, especially as it
relates to pet owners who ignore neighbor requests to keep their dogs in the house/quiet
during night hours.
The current laws work. Many dogs have been professionally trained with voice commands,
have ecollars or retractable leashes. While there is a plethora of information in favor of and
against various leashing options, they represent the variety used by owners. We DO NOT
have a widespread issue on this front as 99% of owners are responsible and manage dogs
well. This is not necessary. We need facts to support a change of this magnitude.
I do not feel this ordinance should be rewritten.
I believe the council may hear from a very vocal minority on this, who don't support the
ordinance. The folks I've seen opposed to the ordinance seem to only be those who believe in
their own supernatural ability to control their dogs as well as, or better than, a physical leash
would. Others are suggesting that being a "good neighbor" means allowing people to walk
their dogs as they wish (without a leash).
Acting like neighborly courtesy and biased self-judgment of one's own abilities are enough to
keep everyone safe and considerate is unfortunately pretty delusional. Similarly, we don't
allow people to drive whatever speed they'd like down neighborhood roads because we trust
them to be good neighbors. We have speed limits as law, for everyone's safety. In the case of
"command control" for dogs/animals some neighbors are complaining that they "invested a
lot of money" in their dog's obedience and their own ability to control them with their voice.
To draw a parallel back to speed limits, if people could "invest a lot of money" in driving
school to be incredible drivers with peerless reaction time, I still don't think neighbors would
take kindly to them driving 50 mph through the neighborhood. Because a) nobody knows
that they went to driving school, and b) nobody would ever trust that they're not going to
have a slip-up and run into a pedestrian. It's the same thing here.
Pet Leash Ordinance Community Input Report Page 8
Here is what the American Kennel Club has to say:
"Like a case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, the leash-aggressive dog is calm, cool, and downright
polite when walking among people or around dogs off-leash. But hook on a leash, and he
lunges, barks, and snaps at the sight of another dog. Has this scenario reduced you to
mapping out walks where you know you won't run into other dogs? While it sounds counter-
intuitive, the road to fixing this issue is actually off-leash interactions with dogs. But don't do
this without seeking the help of a professional dog trainer, because before you take this step,
you must learn how to correctly read the native language of dogs—body language! If you
don't know what your dog or the other dog is saying with their body signals, you may see play
when it's really tension, and tension when it's really dog play.
Although leash-aggressive dogs rarely follow through with a bite, the experience is
frightening and embarrassing enough to make their owners decide to limit or eliminate walks
altogether. But that doesn't have to be the case if you understand the causes and solutions
for this type of behavior.
A combination of frustration and tension, leash aggression is a common problem. Many dogs
that show these traits crave interaction with other dogs, but most have less-than-stellar
canine social skills for creating a successful meet and greet. Much like a child who runs onto a
playground and puts another child in a headlock as a way of saying, "Hey, let's be friends!" a
dog lacking social skills may lunge and bark at a passing dog instead of using subtle signs to
signal their desire to form a relationship. When their owners witness this behavior they
(understandably) pull their dogs away and avoid exposing them to social interactions with
other canines. But this ensures that their dog will never learn how to correctly interact with
other dogs, and dooms them and their dog to a life devoid of canine friendships.
Call in the Experts. In addition, a qualified trainer can help you evaluate your dog to see if this
is a typical case of leash aggression, or if there's something else happening. Whenever I'm
handling this type of dog behavior problem, I always make sure that the dog has had a
complete veterinary exam to rule out any medical causes for the behavior."
The current rules are working. The proposed changes are far too restrictive
As dog owners ourselves, we think it would be great if it was possible for the city to better
enforce owners picking up after dogs as well. Can all leashes have a "doggie bag" holder?
This survey is worded in such a way to give advantage to proponents of proposed leash
ordinance. Not a very objective survey.
Pet Leash Ordinance Community Input Report Page 9
We have a granddaughter severely allergic to dogs. It is dangerous to take her for walks when
she visits twice a week. We would like to be able to take her to the park without worrying
about a dog, friendly or not, approaching her.
Electronic and retractable leashes should be considered.
Must have ordinance to keep people especially children safe.
Give us a dog park please. Put poop bags next to the garbage cans in the parks like other
cities. Install dog watering stations at the parks. Thank you.
The City needs to stop sending out surveys that have biased language. You can't ask
questions 3 and 4 if you don't think there is a problem with off-leash voice commands instead
of strict leash requirements. Also, nothing in this survey addresses potential changes to "
guidelines regarding animal control on private property, including electronic pet fencing and
tethering pets outdoors." It is not clear whether "guidelines" would be non-binding or
requirements that, if violated, could trigger city action. There are plenty of penalties for
problem pets and there is no need for further regulation on this issue. Further regulation is
actually the opposite of more progressive communities that recognize the importance of
growing more integration between the community and the pets in the community, such as by
relaxing limitations on allowing pets in commercial establishments. Civil actions, fines, and
existing laws are enough, and looking to more when you just shot down a dog park just
makes the City Council look bad. Considering the number of dogs in this community, it is time
to offer more, not less, for families with pets. Pick something better to do with the time of
our city officials and police than pet ordinances. You have enough problems with a half
empty set of stop malls defining our town, a stalled and controversial light rail project,
budget concerns, and keeping business in the area.
retractable leashes are fine, so are well trained dogs who respond to voice commands. The
city should be more worried about it's out of control property taxes and over-regulation of
EVERYthing including building.
Voice command is not sufficient.
Pick up the poop !!!
No
I think electronic collars should be an acceptable form of controlling dogs too.
As an owner of two dogs, I appreciate this. I have yet to meet a dog on fool proof voice
control. I would not want to encounter an unleashed dog while walking my dogs. Too many
people think it's about their dog "oh my dogs nice" and let their dogs get too close to others.
Pet Leash Ordinance Community Input Report Page 10
I could maybe see it in an open space, like a park but not on city streetS or trails. Retractable
leashes are also an issue, most trainers don't like them and owners rarely use them correctly
or responsibly. A Eft leash should be plenty.
I am against "The new ordinance could also outline guidelines regarding animal control on
private property, including electronic pet fencing and tethering pets outdoors" aspect of this
ordinance. Any ordinance dictating how I should handle my pet on my property is overreach
and abuse of power.
I'm so very happy you are modernizing this! We have so many kids (and more than a few
adults) in the neighborhood with behavior reactions to uncontrolled pets, this is going to
make a lot of families feel safer at the park, or even in their own yards! Please include an
ability for public safety to respond to complaints of unleashed pets on an adjacent property
(company, schools and churches or other large private lawn spaces people treat like parks).
It's a big issue in our area and I feel bad for police who aren't able to respond.
I appreciate you looking into this issue. I agree that dogs should not be just running free.
Thanks for asking!
We should spend our time on important issues such as plowing sidewalks on Golden Valley
Road, and reducing burglary
Pet Leash Ordinance Community Input Report Page 11
Reasons for updating the City code, other than it "has not been updated in several decades"
are not apparent to me. Has the city staff made data available to the public specific to this
topic that shows leash laws make communities safer? I believe that leash laws disincentivize
the public from properly training animals to respond to voice commands which puts animals
and the public at risk. If the public does not have a legal option to let their animal off leash,
they are likely to rely too heavily on mechanical restraint which leaves the animal and public
vulnerable to unsafe situations. What happens when the leash is dropped, the tether is
broken, or the animal slips out the door? The public faces the same if not greater risk.
I propose the City Council of Golden Valley explore alternative options to keep the public and
animals safe. Some ideas include: Requiring the public to purchase an annual animal license
that gives owners the option to pay an additional fee for certification to allow off-leash voice
command control of animals by passing a test. Secondly, Golden Valley could consider
adding off-leash facilities to city parks for owners to train off-leash commands, offsetting
costs through license fee collection. As of today, I pay license and access fees to other
municipalities and travel outside of our community to enjoy off-leash areas. A third option
would be to consider zoning quieter areas of the community where existing off-leash voice
command recall ordinance remains unchanged.
As a final thought, I'd like to remind the you and the council that Australia recently passed
laws effectively recognizing animals as sentient beings. This means the law recognizes that
animals can feel and perceive the world around them and deserve to have quality of life that
reflects their intrinsic value. To me an ordinance that requires 6 clarifying points on proper
use of a tether does not recognize animal's intrinsic value. So I ask, why the negative
reinforcement? For the sake of our beloved community, let's try positive reinforcement.
Changing the leash law is not necessary. I have lived in this community for over 40 years and
have always been a responsible dog owner. Dogs that are well controlled verbally by their
owners should be allowed to continue to take walks off-leash. Our neighborhood has always
appeared to be dog-friendly. I have to wonder how many of our neighbors are truly upset
about seeing a dog walking off-leash with its' owner. I'm guessing that it's a very small
minority of people. Responsible dog owners and their dogs would be penalized by this
change in the law. Taking a survey to find out this information is useful. At the very least,
not allowing dogs to be on retractable leashes that can be let out to over 6 feet is a terrible
idea.
The current law is adequate. More stipulations become untenable, unenforceable and
draconian. Leave well enough alone!!
Everyone has a "good dog"...until they're not. Keep them leashed.
Pet Leash Ordinance Community Input Report Page 12
It has been my experience that some dog owners claim they have voice control of their dog
when in reality they do not. It's just an excuse to let their dogs run free. The new rule would
remove that excuse.
We have laws about leashing. We have fines/penalties if a dog attacks a human or other dog.
Leashing on your own property is ridiculous.
This will just be another ordinance that won't be enforced....just like the winter parking
restrictions. The current ordinance is just fine.
Most retractable leashes come in 16' lengths, and is a reasonable length when walking and
allows our dog to wonder at their pleasure. At that length I can easily retract it if another
group is approaching or we are crossing a busy street.
I completely disagree with anything limiting how we control our animal on our own property.
A leash is what works best for my animal on my property. For others that's an electric fence.
Why does it matter as long as the animal can't access public property?
Kind, well-behaved, trained dogs should not have to be leashed at all times. All of the people
that have dogs in the neighborhood have spent a great deal of time working with their dogs
to teach them how to act around other dogs, children and adults.
Don't tell me how to control my pet on my private property.
As a dog owner of two incredibly well-behaved chihuahuas I am not in support of this policy,
especially one that feels this drastic. I understand there are mixed sentiments around the
current state-of-the-state and I also understand that there are a few bad apples who ruin it
for the majority. Part of what I love about Golden Valley is how pet friendly it is, especially in
my neighborhood. I purchased a home two years ago overlooking an off-leash dog park and
that was definitely part of the appeal. I do allow my dogs to roam in the yard with me,
outside of their fence. They are never unattended and they've never bothered a soul.
If a policy change does occur I would hope that you would at least consider extending the 6 ft
leash mandate - it's not only disappointing, it seems cruel for a suburban neighborhood
(using a leash that short wouldn't even let my little ones tumble in the grass freely).
I also very much appreciate that this survey went up so quickly to pulse the community-
when something effects our everyday life I like knowing that we all have a voice.
Thank you,
-Kelly
Pet Leash Ordinance Community Input Report Page 13
I feel all pets should be on a leash I do however disagree with the decision be made to length
and type.
Who determines the ability of a pet to be controlled by voice command? -the owner? -
nonsense!
I've been rushed and barked at by dogs in parks! In a matter of seconds a dog could be out of
control. "Stop biting that man Fido" is real effective.
25 to 50 feet for training leads
This is a public safety issue. Residents should be able to walk around the city without feeling
threatened by dogs who are off leash. Not everyone likes dogs, and off-leash dogs can scare
them. We don't live in Hooterville. The % of dogs in our state is 32%, which means there are
about 6,700 dogs in GV. We're all safe when they're leashed. I asked my veterinarian, who
practices in GV, about this issue and she said they see a lot of injuries caused by unleashed
dogs. She said voice control is great ... until it's not - until the dog is motivated to not be
controlled.These are animals. Even the best dog can be spooked or distracted and act in an
unanticipated manner. Even the best-trained dog can break training and scare or hurt a
person or another dog. This is about humans respecting the social space of other humans.
Voice control is completely subjective, and no other cities around us have this loophole -for
good reason! No one can guarantee their off-leash dog is 100% under their voice command
100% of the time. Unless you're in physical control of your dog, your dog isn't really under
control. A "mental" leash isn't a leash.
Signage regarding rule to pick up poop. Maybe even a place to get bags.
I know that the ordinance currently allows for dogs off leash, if the dog is controlled as well
as they would be on leash. I have encountered a number of dogs off leash, usually while
walking my own dog (on leash.) Not a single dog I have EVER seen off leash stayed within 6'
of their owner. Every single owner I have ever seen that thought their dog would be that well
controlled was wrong, every single time.
Honestly if I thought it was realistic, it would be fine, but it's just not. It's very frustrating
when other peoples dogs start running at us as they mumble about how "usually" their dog is
so well behaved. They're not. They never are. It's just not happening. What ends up
happening is there are dog owners who just keep their dogs on leash, and there are dog
owners who let their dogs just run wherever. Unless the city is actually going to enforce the
law as written (somehow,) it's just better to not allow dogs off leash outside of dog parks.
No specific law is needed. It should be common sense and issues such as dog attacks should
be dealt with as they occur with no specific requirements on leashes.
Pet Leash Ordinance Community Input Report Page 14
Whether or not a dog can be controlled by voice command under any stress or unusual
circumstance can only be proven (in the negative) after the dog causes injury or damage.
Spaces like open fields and the path around Brownie Lakes are so great for dogs to run
around and for their owners for to connect. It's an important part of our community that our
dogs spend time off leash (though in control) in Golden Valley.
The owners of Dogs must be responsible for picking up their poop! Too many times I find in
my yard random poop! Take responsibility dog owners!
I live one block from the nature area and walk in it or past it several times per week. Many
owners take their dogs off leash into the nature area. Do I have a problem with that?
Absolutely not! One guy in particular is older and limps but he has a very energetic dog who
romps around in the park. That's terrific. What isn't terrific is the guy whom I haven't seen in
a while who has two dogs who are on leashes but have to be restrained so they don't attack
my dog. They actually attacked a neighbor's dog a couple of years ago, the neighbor was
away from home, and so I ended up driving the disraught daughter and the dog to the vet.
He was OK except for his eye which needed some eyedrops. I would love to see some sort of
ordinance of once and done -- if your dog attacks another person or another dog, there is a
$500 fine.
PS The only time our dog get outside off leash is when she escaped past an open door and
then we run her down. She would be lunch for a coyote.
I wouldn't limit leash length, allow retractable leashes.
We constantly have off leash dogs in our neighborhood and the owners let them on our
property unrestrained. It's a public nuisance (often digging in our yard or leavimg waste) and
we wholeheartedly support requiring leashes on dogs in all cases.
I believe the majority of dog owners manage their pets on extendable leashes up to 12 feet.
Restrictions on this are difficult to enforce and seem to be aimed at a few offenders. Animals
controlled by voice commands are fine, I have not had a problem with this ever. This review
seems random, without a violation trend or example of threat to support a change. It also
seems at odds with practices in neighboring cities. Unless there is a pattern of offenses city
wide why spend resources on what appears to be of random problems that are not systemic.
I have been chased by unleashed dogs while out jogging at least 5 times, so I would
appreciate this ordinance very much. In all instances that I have been chased, the dog DID
NOT respond to voice commands.
Pet Leash Ordinance Community Input Report Page 15
The wording for this survey is deceptive and doesn't address the real question of voice
control as an acceptable form of dog restraint. For the record, if voice restraint is an effective
method for controlling one's dog, it should remain thus in the current ordinance.
What about retractable leashes? How are you going to enforce the 6 ft long rule with those?
Those can go up to 15ft. Will you issue tickets?
The article has mentions ordinance for private property. I would need to know more
information before supporting any restrictions there. Without that info, I would oppose any
restrictions to private property.
I think the councils time would be better spent addressing the issues with people keeping
there dogs outdoors all year round and strengthening the abilities of the police to do
something about it.
If you guys are looking for quality data to make real decisions about city policy, you need to
improve your survey writing skills. First, you should write the survey a non-leading manner;
This is survey writing 101. Also, its hard for people visualize how long 6 feet is - instead,
perhaps giving people perspective on the length of standard leashes. In fact, you could have
probably combined question #3 and #4 to get better results (and easier to analyze) -
something like "Standard non-retractable leash lengths range from 4 to 8 feet long.
Retractable leashes can range from 15 to 30 when fully extended. How long do you think the
maximum leash should be in Golden Valley?A) less than four feet B) four to six feet Q six to
ten feet D) ten feet or more E) I don't think there should be a maximum length" Please spend
more time thinking about the surveys you write before you send them out.
This is important to protect our dogs, our kids, and ourselves. My dogs, my daughter, and I
have all been injured by dogs off leash, even when the owner is nearby.
In the absence of a clear and serious problem needing address (other than, e.g., getting one
or two vocal complainants to stop complaining, which may be the problem here), I strongly
question the need to change the ordinance. I run regularly, and while there have been a
couple times that poorly controlled dogs have been a problem, it's never been a major safety
issue. What's more, why adopt yet another ordinance seeking to control individual behavior,
when it's rarely if ever enforced (or even worse, selectively enforced)? Please leave the
current ordinance as-is.
I would love to be able to walk freely with my cat (leashed) in my own yard without worrying
that the dog next door was not going to run into our yard again and this time rather than pick
her up and be forced to the ER for antibiotics, not pick her up and have her killed by the
neighbor dog. In my yard. They should be leashed or have invisible fences if they are any
danger whatsoever to other animals and pets. I could care less about a little dog or basset
Pet Leash Ordinance Community Input Report Page 16
hound that isn't going to hurt other animals or kids, but too many people assume it's okay to
have a potentially dangerous to other animals dog run out of their yard or off the sidewalk
and into someone else's yard in GV.
I use a 25' long lead for training.
Deal with people who leave their pets outside all year round.
I think retractable leashes should be permitted when dog is not in an "actively inhabited
public space-Streets, etc. to permit dogs to "explore" beyond 6 feet. In my neighborhood
dogs frequently make a run for it when delivery people come to people's homes. We are all
familiar with local dogs and know to grab any escapees. Clearly owners don't want their dogs
out and are anxious when these occurrence take place. I would like to recognize that there is
a very different scenario when an owner intentionally has a dog off leash or isn't controlling
their pet in an active public area (or their neighborhood for that matter) and when dogs are
escaping their homes or fenced confines.
I love dogs and cats. I have been nipped at and chased by dogs that the owner thought were
under control. For the safety of our pets, our children and ourselves, dogs (and cats) need to
be leashed. I don't mind longer leashes, as long as the owner can rein in the animal when
others are around. Even the best trained dogs cannot always go against their nature. It's just
not worth the risk.
I think the rule should change to: "All dog owners are to be responsible for the behavior of
their dog and must be in a position with the proper equipment (leash, collar, commands) to
ensure their dog does not physically touch, encroach or threaten persons or dogs in public
arenas without verbal or written approval.
Doesn't the City of Golden Valley have more important topics to delve into than this?
A big disappointment in our elected officials. Dog owners have the intelligence to know
when and where our pups should or should not be leashed. We do not need a mandate.
While most dogs walked off-leash are well trained, not all are. Without familiarity with a
specific dog, there is no way to know how it will behave when you encounter it off-leash.
Even well trained dogs are often allowed to chase wildlife when off-leash resulting in the dog
being temporarily uncontrolled and creating potential safety issues.
The proposed ordinance strikes me as a reasonable and appropriate balance of the interests
of dog owners and their neighbors (I've been a dog owner in Golden Valley for 35 years).
Pet Leash Ordinance Community Input Report Page 17
I have a small (101b) dog who is not dog friendly. She will snap at other dogs who approach
her and while she might not do a lot of damage, she's likely to be killed when they snap back.
We walk her at odd hours or late in the evening to avoid other dogs. Despite our efforts to
avoid other dogs, there have been multiple times another dog has enthusiastically
approached her off leash. She goes ballistic and I've lifted her up over my head to get her out
of range of the other dog while they are jumping on me trying to get to her. It's scary and
frustrating and dangerous. People love to think they have voice control over their dogs and
I'm sure some of them do but it's clear to me that at least some of them don't.
For the protection of everyone and all dogs, please change the ordinance.
I have owned 2 - 3 dogs at any given time since I moved to Golden Valley in 2001. 1 strongly
agree that all dogs should be on a leash no longer than 6'. 1 don't trust owners who say their
dog responds to 'voice commands' as that training and response is usually a product of a
controlled environment. A dog obedience training center, a private fenced yard or a large
field in the country where the dog will be a hunting partner. When in a public area there are
too many distractions for both the owner and the dog. Same applies to dogs in the front yard
under voice control...it's not a controlled environment and I am not confident that the owner
is going to have constant eyes on the dog and they wouldn't dart out into the street after a
squirrel or rabbit or a person passing by with a dog on leash. I don't want to see a dog hit by a
car and I don't want to be the victim of a dog attack. I've experienced that first hand and
several thousand dollars later. I have never had a seriously negative experience with a dog in
an owners front yard who had an electric fence. I appreciate the signage but have had dogs
charge the perimeter of their yard while we're on the sidewalk and it scares the crap out of
me. Sometimes the owner yells out the front door that there's an electric fence ... not to
worry. Well, that's fine for them but I've already soiled myself and my dog(s) are
hyperventilating. Bottom line, I'm in strong support of all dogs being on a lead no longer than
6'. Retractable leads do NOT provide the control and direction a standard lead does. I'm also
experienced in mishaps with those. I am not in favor of dogs being under 'voice control' in
public areas or in private front yards. I don't know what the proposed ordinance says about a
dog being on a tether or tied up lead in the front yard but I've also experience that and don't
have an issue with it. I can SEE the tether or the lead and as long as the dog can't run into a
public walk way it's not a problem. Unfortunately I've seen many dogs hit the end of that
tether and choke themselves. This can cause injury to their throat and necks but that's the
owner's judgment call.
Pet Leash Ordinance Community Input Report Page 18
The city should not regulate how pet owners contain & control their pets on private property.
Not everyone likes dogs. Even if people do like dogs, children and dogs don't always mix well,
even if a dog has never reacted poorly with a child doesn't mean they never will.
People don't always leash their pets at the park or at the General Mills nature preserve and
that can be scary and dangerous. When my kids were 3, we were run down and knocked
down by a "puppy" off leash and the owners did not have voice control or any control of the
dog.
Unfortunately, people cannot be left to their own devices and trusted to ACTUALLY have
their pets under "voice control." I don't think most dog owners know what that actually
means. On walks with our dog (who is always leashed because we know very well he's not
always going to follow commands) we've encountered many people who think their dog is
listening, but clearly is not. Their dogs harass ours (nipping,jumping on), follow us, etc. and
the owners just stand there and yell at them, or laugh like it's not a big deal. It is. If you own a
dog, it shouldn't be a burden to take them for a walk on a leash, so implementing a leash
ordinance in Golden Valley shouldn't be a big deal.
I don't think leashes are necessary for dogs that obey commands.
If there's no dog park in the city of GV, how can GV tell owners that they must be leashed at
all times?
I have a 9 lb Min Pin and a Welsh Corgi terrier mix. We do not walk them except when we
are out of the city; we do not take our dogs to 'off leash parks' as they are too dangerous and
dirty; we take our dogs out in our backyard ON retractable LEASH and harness. In addition to
loose stray/owned dogs, we are always alert for coyote, large owls, hawks, fox, raccoons at
night any one of which could decide the Min Pin would be a tasty meal. Perhaps 2-3 times a
year our Min Pin will sneak out the door and run like fire - but my first worry is cars that
speed down our street. I get in my van with the back door open, drive down the street with
a treat in hand and she will jump in the car; occasionally a neighbor will catch her and she
never bothers anyone. I do think that dogs being walked should be leashed, but I think it
should be left up to the owners discretion as to what type of leash is used. I personally
believe, from our vet's review, that a good harness (Ruffwear) and a retractable leash set to
keep the dog 1-2 feet near you when passing other walkers with or without dogs. We also
have a Ruffwear expandable walking leash which we use out in the country. That is what
works for us and it might not fit everyone's needs, but I don't believe legislating leash lengths
and types is a good use of Golden Valley's resources. Loose dogs running, owned or wild,
should be addressed.
Pet Leash Ordinance Community Input Report Page 19
Private property should be exempt from leash rules, especially length requirements.
Electronic fencing should be allowed.
Since we did not get the dog park- we don't have anywhere to have the dogs off leash unless
at a park where the dogs can run . We really enjoy taking our dog to park off leash to play-
What is the current enforcement? Have there been issues with the current policy? How much
control can you really have on private property?
I do not think that the city needs to regulate leash length for its citizens. This is a gross
overreach.
In the 8+years we've lived in GV, I've only on a very few occasions met up with a dog that
was impolite enough to cause me a disturbance -every single time that dog was
appropriately on a leash,just handled by someone who was distracted, inexperienced, or just
being disrespectful of others around them. We owned ourselves a well trained dog for many
years who was by far more obedient than most other dogs we would encounter when out in
public and he was most obedient when walking along with us, off leash and under voice
control.
I do think there would be a great benefit to more public education and awareness of the
current ordinances and the consequences of not adhering to them with dogs that are not
adequately trained. I do however, feel that changing the ordinance to arbitrarily require
leashing will be unlikely to do much to change the behavior of those who are ignorant or
choosing to disregard the qualifications already required currently.
A side issue is the proposition of regulating the way dogs are kept within private property.
This also comes across to me as arbitrary. One of the things we chose this area and our home
for was the fact that not ALL of the yards are fenced off and separated from each other.
Invisible fencing might be prohibitively expensive for some and does not work for all dogs.
Physical fences, especially combined with the limited sidewalks available only makes
connecting with neighbors that much more difficult and unwelcoming. Based on my personal
experience, those who are choosing not to adequately train, restrain, or control their animals
are *likely* to continue to do so regardless of what the ordinances are.
On a final note, I do feel it is appropriate to maintain the requirement to have a dog on leash
with public parks. For both their safety and the safety of others.
It just makes sense.
Residents should see what data exists that has triggered a need to change this law. I'm a firm
believer that bad dog behavior is caused by bad owners ... no leash law will solve this. It is not
acceptable to punish responsible dog owners. The requirement to leash on private property
is ridiculous. It's private property ... private.
Pet Leash Ordinance Community Input Report Page 20
We have a massive yard, to put in fencing would could close to $15k. We do not have the
money to do that and our dog responds promptly to all commands. Please consider a
different option for those with well trained animals.... like giving fines to those that ARE NOT
trained or being cared for.
I think people should use what they need to keep their dog under control. I can see times
when 6' would not be appropriate. Are you talking about a leather exclusive leash?
This is so ridiculous. I've yet to come across a poorly behaved pet. If something happens, it
would obviously fall on the owner. Don't punish all responsible owners of well behaved
animals, because of some fear. We need to be adults who accept responsibility for ourselves,
not telling others what to do, on such a minuscule issue.
No changes to private property.
I think that if pets are contained by voice commands and are within a reasonable distance
from the owner, there should be no issue.
Get busy solving real problems
Each owner should be responsible for their dog. If they can control them with voice
commands that's fine.They should not be ticketed when the dog is not causing an issue just
for not being on a leash. However if they are off leash and cause an issue then for sure they
should be cited.
Dogs should be leashed if they are not in a fenced yard or in a dog park. P.E.R.I.O.D.
On public land all animals need to be leashed and under owners control. If you are having a
picnic for example a longer leash should be acceptable but if walking around other people a
6' leash should be used. My question is, why is somebody looking for a solution when there
isn't a problem with current laws?
There shouldn't be regulation on pets leashes or unleashed if on private property.
if more dog owners they should use have harness on dogs for more control instead of
hooking the leash to dog collar give people discount at pet store to get harness if
violate brake the law t get a ticket send for 2hour class on how control the dog at Animal
humane society of golden valley mn
As a resident of Golden Valley I would prefer more freedom and less pointless laws and
regulations.
Pet Leash Ordinance Community Input Report Page 21
We have lived along Lions Park for 14 years. More than ever, people leave their pets
unleashed as they walk through the park and while their kids are playing at the park. It is very
common to see dog fights ensue.
Extendable leashes are okay, but must be retractable to shorter lengths.
Retractable leashes should be allowed when no other dogs or humans are around. Where I
walk I rarely encounter anyone and appreciate the dog being able to "run" around a bit and
explore. Not harming anyone.
I think as long as dogs are leashed, the type of leash (retractable or not) should not matter.
Please don't eliminate the option to use a slightly longer, retractable leash in public. This type
of leash allows my high energy dog (that is always on leash) a little more freedom to run
about and get exercise while we're walking. Very easy to draw in and lock at a shorter length
when others are approaching.
I can't imagine that our current leash laws need to be more strict. Could it be that there are
people not following the current laws and that should be addressed?The proposed changes
to the law seem overly strict and out of character for our city. I think of Golden Valley as a
community that is a progressive and accepting community and this law is the exact opposite
of that.
Thank you for your consideration.
Both these questions are not binary choices. There should be an ordinance requiring
CONTROL of all pets. Leashes, including retractables would be ONE acceptable option. Voice
control is also acceptable, but needs to be defined.
The people who want a leash law give examples of being aggressed by dogs who are not on
leashes. To me that says the owners are already breaking the law. It seems more likely that
the persons who are upset did not want openly call out the said resident. That is a problem.
How about enforcing the law we already have about dogs being required to be under voice
control? This doesnt seem to be a wide spread problem and law abiding citizens and pooches
should not be punished by more restrictions on something that is not a widespread issue.
Non-retractable leash. It can be made of various materials (leather, cloth, etc).
(#4 did not accept my answer) Please do not accept "under voice command". also,
retractable leashes should be acceptable of course. the issue is not the leash length. the
Pet Leash Ordinance Community Input Report Page 22
issue is can the dog's owner walk or stand to keep their dog/s away from other dogs and
people.
I do not support a law that restricts a pet's enjoyment on their own property — Le., tethered
or restrained.
I think there should be clear exceptions for service dogs/animals in any ordinance. I think that
there should be no encouragement of invisible fences in any ordinance. I think retractable
leashes should be allowed.
I also think the city would do better to post both the current ordinance and a version
including proposed changes before posting surveys like this so that it is completely clear what
the city may choose to do and people will be less likely to be confused.
The owner should be able to decide for themselves for leash length. No one size fits all
remedies are possible. Small dog vs. large dog makes a big difference.
It is despicable that Golden Valley is starting a war on dogs. Private property is private
property, get off my land! And if GV doesn't want to create spaces for dogs to play, then how
dare you to tell owners how to handle their dogs in public. Children are more of a nuisance
than dogs are, are we going to require shock collars on them?This is a disgrace to the world.
I think that. a dog should be able to be off leash if it has been trained for voice commands,
also for sure a dog should be allowed to be off leash on personal property or in an invisible
fenced yard. My dog has been sent for training 4 times and I often walk her off leash down to
the lake and over to theo wirth or down to the softball fields and pond.
Responsible dog ownership cannot be legislated. I would like to see some data identifying the
extent of the problems to be addressed by a new ordinance. Where I live is not densely
populated and I often do not encounter other people or dogs in public spaces when I am
walking. A six foot leash is overkill for controlling my dog.
adfadsf
Appreciate the opportuity to weigh in on this issue. Of all the issues facing our city and
resident quality of life, I am not sure leash laws are the most important issue for council and
staff to focus on in 2020.
Pet Leash Ordinance Community Input Report Page 23
I'd like more information on what prompted the city council to update the pet leash
ordinance.
Are there enough incidences that would require this change? If so, what is the justification
behind it and what evidence shows this change will be effective?
One of the reasons why I moved to Golden Valley is because of reasonable ordinances such
as a leash law that allows voice command restraint. I like this because it puts the
responsibility back on the person without mandating exactly how the person should act.
I also believe in not over-governing citizens of your city.
Instead of trying to control all dog owners, maybe you need to increase the punishment for
the bad owners (ones who let their dogs get out of control). Don't let a few bad apples ruin
the bunch.
As a dog owner, I understand that there are irresponsible dog owners. I can see the voice
command exemption as hard to enforce and subject to interpretation by owners who,
through wishful thinking, do not leash their dogs. However, I think all leashes, including flexi
leashes up to 10 feet, should be allowed. A six foot leash overly penalizes both owner and
dog for the sins of a few irresponsible owners.
I will send via email. In general, I'm pretty agnostic on most questions, but I do feel that off-
leash walking on Golden Valley streets/public areas under "Voice Command" (or any other
sort of non-leash system such as hand signals, shock collar, etc.) isn't realistic in the context
of an inner-ring suburb.
15 to 20 foot recoil lease with locking mechanism. Lock allows owner to keep pet at a fixed
length of a foot or two up to the full range distance
I agree with the recommendations but do not feel this should apply to private property. If
your dog can be controlled with voice command, that should be sufficient when on your own
property.
Retractable leashes are dangerous for bikers/pedestrians, but 6' is not long enough for toy
breeds
As for the discussion on having pets tethered or not on private property, I have had dogs run
into the street to greet me and my dog and my dog being leashed and that dog not, my dog
not liking it. I do believe of the owner does respect just keeping the dog in their yard and the
Pet Leash Ordinance Community Input Report Page 24
dog is well trained that is fine, but for the owners who don't care, I am not sure whose side
the law is on now, but I would say that the owner of
The current ordinance is fine.
Retractable leashes are a bad idea when it comes to safety. Dogs and owners may enjoy the
additional leash, but as a person, the ability for the dog to lunge is problematic as well as the
fact that the long leash itself is a hazard when running on trails or sidewalks due to the thin
cord.
I'd like to see an ordinance that offers flexibility to dog owners who have trained their pets.
Otherwise dogs ought to be on leashes.
I don't support the new proposed law.
Aggressive dogs should be on a tighter leash, but gentle well behaved obedient animals don't
need such control.
My neighbors dog poops in my yard it's hardly ever leashed.
I strongly support leash laws!
The point of having a leash law is for the protection of the dog, other pets, and people. There
should not be a restriction of the length of the leash but a restriction that the owner has to
be in control of the leash and pet. What dog wants to take a walk and be restricted to only 6
ft. Retractable leashes go upwards of 12 ft and you can still maintain full control of your dog
by using common sense! We don't want families to not want to move into the city because
of a strict dog leash ordinance, when in fact a few bad incidents were from owner error in
either judgement or common sense!
Voice command is not always safe when other dogs are around. Especially miniature ones
There should be no consideration for adding restrictions to pet restraint within the boundary
of privately owned single family homes. Requiring invisible fencing or tethering of animals is
a gross overreach of bureaucratic officials. Homeowners should be allowed the right to
determine the best course of action to take when pets are outdoors, based on the
individual's pets behavior, personality, and ability to understand and obey verbal commands.
There is no need to change the current requirements.
Irresponsible people ruin it for the rest of us. There are people in my neighborhood whose
dog walks better off leash than mine on a leash. The rules we have are fine, they're just not
enforced. Making stronger rules won't solve the issue. There is mention of designated off
leash space, to my knowledge there is no public off leash space here in Golden Valley. My
Pet Leash Ordinance Community Input Report Page 25
maximum off leash is for retractable, it's nice if you're in spot to let your dog investigate a
tree or something (I usually keep mine shorter, so if it were 6 feet and I occasionally broke
rule to let my dog sniff a tree, I'll be fine)
As long as people have control of their animal by a tether I don't care how long the leash is.
Why anger people with unnecessary restrictions?
Also, what about electronic collars? I sometimes walk my dog with a collar that has a remote
control. It can even vibrate to get her attention or static charge zap her if she doesn't listen.
What about free roaming cats? I saw a woman almost lose control of her car (and could have
hurt people) due to an outdoor cat.
I don't see any need to fix things that don't need fixing. I feel people are very responsible and
respectful in our neighborhood. The walk is for the dog's pleasure and mine likes to check out
things along the way.
When leashed, I think 6 feet is acceptable. Properly trained dogs should be able to run
around parks and yards so long as they respond to commands and are cleaned up after.
There should NOT be an exception for pets under voice command. Most pets are NOT 100%
reliable under voice command, proven by the number of off leash dogs that run up to my dog
on walks while their owner yells "They're friendly!" at me. Off leash dogs also crap on lawns
while Theo owners walk a half a block ahead and don't pick up.
I think retractable leases are fine I always brought my dog closer when coming upon other
dogs and people
If we have an ordinance someone had better enforce it.
Properly trained dogs should be able to run around parks and yards so long as they respond
to commands and are cleaned up after.
Please keep Golden Valley a dog-friendly city.
Voice commands are sufficient and the public safety aspect is remedied by the disclaimer
that pets must be leashed in parks.
Lets include cats who are loose, kill birds, and are hit by cars regularly because they are loose
and at risk.
Pet Leash Ordinance Community Input Report Page 26
More laws aren't going going to help anything. People will take care of their animal or they
won't. The current law is fine and barely enforced. Might as well be more specific on
speeding, noise complaints...housing maintenance. General regulations are fine... but it's
ultimately up to people to change the culture etc... nobody cares about a 25 dollar petty
misdemeanor fine blah blah blah.
how often should I bathe? Figure out a way to get people to care about others and be
considerate.
Just getting people to talk about this topic will do far more than passing city ordinances.
Hopefully it extends to picking up dog waste and litter from people. That there would be
great.... if you get really motivated....go after violent crime, greed and obesity.
I have lots of ideas.
I think very well behaved dogs and owners are OK to be off leash... That said how is one to
know if songs are well behaved enough? It always is once to see the well behaved dogs off
leash running and fetching in GV parks but I do worry that a dog could be injured or injure
while of leash. I guess I am kind of wishy washy on this. I do however have a problem with
fertilizer being ised in grass! :)
Requiring leather leashes is ridiculous, as some people's beliefs would not allow them to use
leather, also some of the nylon/other materials could be just as good. Also, retractable
leashes should be allowed.
Dogs should be leashed at all times outside of its home or yard, unless it's within a dog park
that allows it.
Pet Leash Ordinance Community Input Report Page 27
First let me say I don't think anyone should be walking their dog with a 30' leash.
The ordinance might be better suited to making the walking length 6 feet and for those that
bring their dogs to parks to train, maybe a longer leash allowance may be made. Training
leads are useful with Labs, Springers, and other fetching animals when you're working with
them.
Also, I read on Nextdoor that the ordinance restricts leashes to leather material. If that's
true, I don't think owners should be restricted to leather. For one thing, it violates certain
animal rights and vegan sensibilities--not that I'm vegan. However, there are plenty of fabric
leashes that perform as well as leather and have reinforcements built in for handling larger
dogs.
Thankfully, I've never had to worry about a pet owner with a longer leash than that when
walking in the Hampshire Park area.
In the end, 6' is pretty long. Just please consider allowing other leashes made of equally
strong materials.
Thanks for listening.
Great idea-all dogs should be leashed. I could see an exception for electronic fences.
I feel that if an animal is trained well the leash law should be lest the way it is written.
Voice command or shock collars should be allowed for well trained pets.
Dog trainers regularly use long leashes to train obedience commands for working dogs
including "come," "stay," & "down." Leashes are are a training tool, that are too often used
as a crutch for controlling poorly trained animals. Eliminating off leash allowances for
working dogs and their handlers is a solution looking for a problem. If this were to be
enacted, I would advocate strongly for the addition of a performance based permit for
animals that can demonstrate off leash obedience.
Whatever the maximum of a retractable lease is. As an owner of a small dog under 15lbs. A
retractable leash is much more convenient. Outlawing them or enforcing 6' leather leash is
inconvenient and not necessary. The fact this is being brought up as an important issue is
absurd.
Over the past five years there has been a steady increase in my neighborhood of visitors with
dogs off leash. I am experiencing more episodes of uncontrolled dogs approaching my dogs
and me, I'm witnessing more unleashed dogs create hazards for bicyclists on park paths, and
Pet Leash Ordinance Community Input Report Page 28
I've observed more unleashed dogs at risk of being struck by vehicles/trains at our
neighborhood's intersection. Too many owners overestimate the voice control of their dog. I
have personally injured a bicyclist and my dogs due to trying to use a retractable leash
(against posted rules), and no longer believe they are safe. My dogs are well-trained and
socialized, but have injured another uncontrolled dog while defending themselves. I did not
reports the incident because I was concerned about wasting police resources. I've had
numerous other close calls. I have to assume there is an issue of under-reporting when
people question if the number of incidents justifies this new regulation. If another serious
incident occurs, I would like the police to be able to have something to support their actions.
I believe the right to dog ownership means accepting the responsibilities imposed by the
community, and I am in favor of the new ordinance as proposed.
Yes, we have no off lease dog parks in GV. Scheid park would be perfect
Seems smart for public safety and to keep them off of lawns or out of areas where they aren't
welcome. Having animals leashed will also mean that owners know when and where their
pets defecate and can clean it up immediately.
The length of the lease in an home-owners yard should be able to be longer than. 6 feet.
GV should have an off lease area somewhere.
Thank you.
Retractable leashes should be considered acceptable. The overwhelming majority of pet
owners will retract a leash to the —6 foot range when passing other pedestrians or pets. But
when no one else is around, a retractable leash offers the pet a bit more room to roam, while
keeping the animal under control at the same time.
Retractable leashes and dogs controlled by voice should be exempt
We have 3 dogs. Yes, leashing is important.
retain ability to have electronic fencing
Retractable leashes should not be restricted. Voice command trained dogs should be allowed
to exercise and play on front yards as some residents don't have back yards. Changes should
not be made without adequate presentation of fact that support the necessity to change to
more restrictive guidelines.
I firmly believe we do not need a new law to address dogs in Golden Valley. The "under
control" policy should remain in place. I believe this is a case of a very small but vocal
minority trying to exercise their control over other's behavior and pet ownership.
Pet Leash Ordinance Community Input Report Page 29
live across entrance to general mills trails at duluth and Aquilla-would say some 60%. folk
who drive up and park let their dogs run free though a Golden Valley City Sign sits at entrance
to trails- perhaps it needs to be larger
I think I already filled out this survey, so sorry if I did! I just took our 10 pound Yorkie Terrior -
poodle mix for a walk and realized that the leash is way longer than 6 feet. It might be 20
feet but is retractable. Maybe you could say leash must be no longer than 6 feet or
retractable to 6 feet. I cannot imagine having a big dog on a 6 foot leash, especially when
walking in the nature area or on trails. They need to run around and sniff!
No just that people make sure they pick up their dogs poop and respect people's yards
Dictating the type of leash goes too far. Max 6 ft seems reasonable. Going beyond that to a
type of leash is overreach.
No retractable leashes
Keep pets on a leash.
If there is no problem, there does not need to be a solution.
Dogs that are 100%verbally controlled should be able to be unleashed on the owner's
property.
Leashes should be required at all times, especially in residential areas. A 6 foot leash gives too
much leeway for dogs to veer off sidewalks and roam on private property
As long as this ordinance only concerns public spaces I think it's a good idea. It should not
apply to homeowners yards whether fenced or not.
Our sidewalks are too narrow for a 6 foot leash. Dog owners are unable to maintain control
of their animals and keep them away from others were traveling along the sidewalk. The city
needs to enforce its ordinance and should publish offenders of the ordinance the same way
they publish other police reports. People are unable to control their dogs are a hazard to the
community members and their children especially in city parks where people often unleash
their dogs and let them run free while young children are playing nearby.
There have been Zero reports of dogs off leash attacks. Only ON leash attacks. Do not try to
fix what is not broken. Common sense people!!
Pet Leash Ordinance Community Input Report Page 30
Consider those who come to our city from outside the United States and have experienced
trauma. Having a dog run up to you, even if friendly, can cause an onset of trauma related
anxiety. Please consider our most vulnerable in this city.
Has there been an incident that would cause GV to change the standing law? What would
happen if we kept it? Laws like these create animosity and bad neighbors. We can all be
grown up and respect each other And be good neighbors
I'm frustrated, annoyed and most recently, scared when one of my neighbor's large dogs
comes onto my property unleashed. The last time the dog ran up to me and barked in my
face while I just froze. Several times, the owner herds his dog back to his property by way of
my driveway toward my garage, and through my shrubbery. It is very stressful. He never
apologizes, but either yells at his unleashed dog or says something to his dog like, 'that's very
bad behavior.' Last time he heard me say, 'it's not the dogs bad behavior' (that he's not
leashed). They also wait until the dogs do their business on my property instead of on theirs
next door. Once I saw a young man in my driveway at 2am. At first, I thought it might be a
robber. Then, I asked him what he was doing and he said, 'looking after my dogs. I then saw
the unleashed neighbor's dog in front of my home about 30 feet from the property line. I
wish these dogs were leashed every time they were outside.
Why now? Has something changed. Let's keep the existing law. This survey represents only a
few . I believe if anything the aggressive dogs are on leashes . People don't walk aggressive
dogs off leash . Friendly dogs are off leash.
no reason to have a rule.
I have neighbors who sometimes have their dogs off leash and they appear to have complete
control with voice commands. I just don't know if this is true for everyone. My dog has been
attacked by an off leash dog once so I'm always wary until I know the owner. I also worry
about off leash dogs and traffic.
Cats are pets; I would like this to apply to cats, too. We routinely have unattended,
unleashed cats wandering across our property or, worse yet, hunting on our property.
Unacceptable.
Is this really something that can be enforced or will it be used re-actively after an incident.
What about designated off leash spaces? What are you trying to correct? I an ordinance the
best way to do that? We can't legislate every type of negative behavior. There is some risk of
harm in life.
Pet Leash Ordinance Community Input Report Page 31
Please allow for retractable leashes and use of discretion/common sense by the owner of the
pet in terms as to what is appropriate for their own dog. Also disagree with mandate for all
home owners to tether their own animals in their own yards. If one has a dog who responds
to voice commands, I see no need to force people to tether their own animal in their own
yard. The 6 ft. max. requirement and forcing all to tether their animal in their own yard is
overkill. IF there are incidents/complaints about individual owner's lack of control over their
pet, then require that owner to pay a fine or to move to a shorter/non-retractable leash.
I am NOT a dog owner, but I've been a home owner in Golden Valley for 35 years and walk
frequently in my neighborhood, (in which there are lots of dogs) and in GV parks as well as
those in other surrounding metro areas. I have NEVER had an incident where I have been
confronted by an out of control dog. I see the proposed leash ordinance as being overkill and
"heavy handed."
I have had 2 dogs who are always harnessed and leashed when outside of our fenced yard.
We walked once or twice daily in our neighborhood and in the Wirth park/woods. Every
single day we encounter off leash dogs, about 75% of whom are clearly not under their
owner's control. Last weekend, my dogs and I were run at by a great dane in the woods.
The dog bit my larger whose leash got wrapped around a tree while I was holding my smaller
dog in my arms. My dogs were leashed; totally in my control; I even stepped off the path and
was hip deep in snow to try to avoid the group be it was clear they were not minding or in
charge of their dog.
This was not an isolated incident. The owner's answer to me was, "other people do it." As I
explained to her, that is not a rational explantion or an acceptable one. The great dane was
doing what dogs do: protecting his people. This was not his fault it was the owner's fault.
This happens nearly every weekend. Both of my dogs have been bit and roughed up and
both while leashed and within a few feet of me. I would greatly appreciate having my rights
protected. Off leash is for off leash areas. Period.
We regularly get approached by off leash dogs while walking our leashes dogs-on streets,in
park, in Wirth. Most of those dogs do not heed and are not under owner's control. I am sick
of hearing,'don't worry: he's nice!' Dogs are dogs. They protect owners. Isn't a matter of
nice. Both my dogs have been bit and come at while they were leashes and in my control. I
have made countless calls to report off leash dogs.
Voice commands are sufficient
Pet Leash Ordinance Community Input Report Page 32
Dear Mayor and Members of Golden Valley City Council: I respectfully express considerable
opposition to the proposed leash law amendment for Golden Valley. My husband, Mark, and
I recently moved to Golden Valley from St. Louis Park with our two mature dogs. They are
well trained to obey voice commands and hand signals. We very much enjoy giving them the
opportunity and freedom to be dogs. The more exercise and time they receive from us, the
healthier and happier our family and neighbors are.
In addition, it has taken considerable time, effort and money to be responsible pet owners to
train our dogs. It is unjust and unnecessary to take away our ability to enjoy our dogs in our
own yard and in the appropriate spaces in Golden Valley. The current leash and voice
command ordinance works. If pet owners are not adhering to the voice command portion,
please consider holding irresponsible pet owners more accountable instead of punishing all
dog owners and their fury companions. If, as a group, you do change the leash ordinance,
please do not require dogs to be tethered on private property. That is overreaching and
completely unfair. Where would the ordinance stop? I have experienced dog and dog owner
aggression from leashed dogs much more often than off-leash trained dogs. What about
cats? I've been bitten by a neighborhood cat, is there a feline ordinance? If you all decide
that voice command will no longer suffice anywhere in Golden Valley please, at a minimum
add line items and dollars to the budget to create neighborhood off-leash dog parks before
you make and enforce the change. You have been elected to represent all members of the
community and spend tax dollars wisely. We would like to be heard. I recommend creating a
focus group to gather input from members of the GV community who have differing opinions
who can work together to understand differing points of view, gather more information,
identify root causes and create solutions for all not just a few. I will be attending the Council
Meeting in April to express ardent disagreement with the proposed leash ordinance change.
In the meantime, please feel free to contact me at the email below. I would be happy to help
you organize a research committee to gather more information and input from the
community. Thank you, Hollace Masino hollacemasino@gmail.com
Please do not outlaw retractable leashes. There is no logical reason to outlaw retractable
leashes. You could state that the dog must be on a very short leash (e.g. 3 ft) when passing
someone else on the path. Retractable leashes allow my dog to explore the smells along the
unmown edges of the trail. This patrolling of territory is instinctual. Dogs want to have a job.
Patrolling is one of the most universal instincts in dogs. Outlawing retractable leashes would
leave the dog unfulfilled.
i think the current leash law puts dogs in danger.
Leashes pets prevent tragedy. Most owners have no idea how to properly read dog behavior
and just because the unleashed dog is friendly doesn't mean the leashed ones are and it
causes so much anxiety for leashed pets.
Pet Leash Ordinance Community Input Report Page 33
This will be very beneficial for dogs and ownersM
As a professional dog trainer I have first hand experience that people believe their dog to
have great recall and are under voice command, but actually don't fully train their dogs under
circumstances where there are distractions, therefore in more trafficked public areas the dog
isn't truly train on, thus posing a risk to themselves, people, children and other dogs that can
result injuries and heartbreak.
I am an animal behavior specialist at the humane society, and was a dog trainer for 5 years
previously. I have a dog who does not like other dogs due to being attacked by an off leash
dog, but is otherwise a lovely girl. I cannot even walk her in my neighborhood anymore in
fear of off leash dogs. I know there are many dog owners who experience this same problem.
We cannot expect average dog owners to be able to responsibly deem their dogs adequately
"under voice control". I think that its dangerous to assume that pet owners can responsibly
decide this for themselves and it puts many dogs in danger.
Off leash pets are often dangerous for leashed pets who feel defensive when other dogs run
up to them since leashed pets can't get away
All dogs should be leashed in public areas as it is a matter of safety for other people and
other dogs
Voice control is not an acceptable substitute for a leash. Not all people who think they have
control actually do which can lead to problems.
Thank you for considering this change to keep people and dogs safe!
Dogs are unpredictable and with reactive dogs on leash, having off leash canines even with a
"voice command" could end very badly.
Leash laws protect people and their pets.
I have seen some people training their dogs in parks on longer leashes, but in the middle of a
field with no people or trails nearby. I don't have any issue with that, but think 6 ft is a good
length for sidewalks and trails. I have had many run-ins with loose dogs in Golden Valley,
including in parks and trails that are posted for on-leash dogs only. One instance resulted in
my dog being bitten. How will this new ordinance be publicized so that owners know the new
rules?
With my dog not being dog friendly, it is scary for other dog that is not on the leash, walking
up to my dog and my dog might attack them. Every dog needs to be on leash for all dogs'
safety. Some of us get stressed out when we see dog off leash.
Pet Leash Ordinance Community Input Report Page 34
So many dogs are scared of other dogs racing up to them while on a leash. This is simply not
fair to both the handler and the scared dog. One bad interaction has the ability to really set
back a dog and handler team that are working hard on making walking near other dogs safe
and predictable. Please consider the safety of ALL dogs! Thank you! —a professional dog
trainer who works to help many of these leash reactive dogs
In public areas that aren't specified dog parks, all dogs should be leashed. I have seen on
leash dogs be attacked by unleashed dogs. Unfortunately irresponsible owners believe their
dogs ate under control, when in reality they aren't.
Ecollars should no be considered under control either.
Ban retractable leashes!!!
If the city is to restrict all off leash dog activities, it must provide an off leash dog park for
dogs to supplement this restriction.
I think 6-10ft is a reasonable limit
Also outlaw shock or electric collars
This proposal is ridiculous. Stop policing everybody so much. Nobody wants to live in a town
where one can't allow their dog a little space. A maximum six-foot leash is overkill. Stop
trying to police everybody so much.
NO pet should allowed to roam free. Fines should be quadrupled for ANY pets found roaming
free.
While some dogs may be reliably controlled by voice command, if threatened or scared they
may react unpredictably. Even if owners can control their own dogs, they cannot control the
world around their dog. For the safety of all animals and people in public spaces, it is best for
all dogs to be leashed.
As a dog walker in the TC area, leash laws are vital to my safety and that of my clients dogs. A
number of owners have let their dogs charge me and my client dogs saying "They're friendly".
I don't care if they are friendly or not, I am responsible for keeping my client dog safe. In
those situations, it is clear the owner did not have voice control of their dog as they have
never once been successful in getting their dog back as it harasses mine. More often than
not, these off leash adventurers don't keep a leash on them at all.
Pet Leash Ordinance Community Input Report Page 35
Longer leashes could be allowed with the stipulation that leashes must be shortened if you
are being approached by a person or dog (Bloomington has similar wording.) Electronic
collars should not count as leashes.
I agree dogs should be leashed out & about on the streets, however dogs that are well-
trained and don't misbehave in parks, beaches etc should be allowed their freedom.
Retractable leashes should also be prohibited, due to their safety risks. Not only for the dog,
their handler, but also those around them.
Please include Flexi leashes to be locked at 6 feet when redrafting this ordinance.
There are several great parks and trails I have to avoid because of out of control off leash
dogs. I would love to be able to enjoy them again if the ordinance changes!
Minneapolis allows 8 feet. Bloomington allows longer than 6 feet as long as you shorten your
line when you see someone approaching. Those are reasonable in my opinion. Unleashed is
not; "under voice command" is open to interpretation but a physical leash is not.
In some places, with a skilled handler, a 10-15 long line may be acceptable. Retractable
leashes shouldn't be allowed. Choke, prong, and electronic collars of any kind should not be
allowed.
I'm in favor of allowing retractable leashes, especially for small dogs.
Dogs should also be required to be on a leash when outside in general. Currently on a
persons own property a leash is not required. Without a fence (invisible or physical) they
quickly go from "in their yard" to in my yard. One dog in particular is DAILY out in their yard.
It has left the yard 5 times to go after my dog, another time after a different dog passing by (I
went to help), and another time after a person. Each time the dog continues to be out. They
should be under leash control when outside, period, or within some sort of fencing system.
All dogs should be on a leash with no exception. Voice commands don't always work and
animals are animals, which means they can be unpredictable.
Please remove the voice command exception to the leash law, except in designated leash
free areas. Unfortunately, some people believe their animals are better trained than they
really are. In the case of a distracted animal that does not respond to the command being
given, there are too many instances where the owner could not respond quickly enough and
the animal or person who is perceived to be a "threat" by the dog would not be able to get
clear quickly enough. I have observed cases where the owner is not staying close to the
Pet Leash Ordinance Community Input Report Page 36
unleashed animal or paying attention to what the animal is doing. Leashes protect both the
animals and the people around them!
I took this survey previously. I have had no issue with dogs off leash but some people have.
People take priority over dogs. Please substitute this survey for my precious one.
Golden Valley needs to do a better job of getting this enforced. There are numerous dogs off
leash in the General Mills nature trails ( off of ensign and Duluth St) Some of the dogs are
aggressive and most people are not picking up their dog's poop . I live only 3 blocks away and
my dog ( who was leashed) was attacked by an unleashed dog, and despite talking to the
owners , they continue to walk their dog off leash. It's gotten so bad that I don't even feel
safe walking my dog in the General Mills nature trails due to aggressive dogs going after my
dog . Many General Mills Employees are also upset about this as they walk in the trails on
their lunch break. Between off leash dogs and a mine field of poop , it is not a pleasant
experience.
Don't ever have a law that states if a dog is under voice command, no leash required. Any
dog can "have a moment". Smaller dogs are not safe. All dogs have leashes. Shouldn't be
the extendable type. Don't need to be made of anything special.
More dogs and walkers out at all times with cobid 19. We need this change.
Absolutely need this change. No dog is 100% safe and there can be new or surprise situations
for any owner & dog.
Who is going to enforce this? Why have rules you can't/won't enforce. What about ordinaces
related to dog waste? On a walk within three blocks of the high density housing (Talo and
Arcata) I saw four bags of dog poop behind a hedge and significant amounts of feces that
weren't event picked up. I also walked past the "dog park" at Talo--not one dog in there.
Poor planning on the part of the city. These high density living complexes should be
REQUIRED to have pet walks/parks as part of the complex!
Leave the existing ordinance as is
It's about the owner's capacity to manage their dog, not the leashing.
Pet Leash Ordinance Community Input Report Page 37
I read the working draft of the proposed ordinance changes and would like to see the
concept of "respect for others" pop up somewhere. Also, perhaps there should be a more
explicit "penalties for violation" set out in the thing. I'm aware that such is typically contained
in a different section of the Code of Ordinances. It is usually treated as a "petit misdemeanor"
(which is a "fine only, no court appearance required) , but I'd like to see something that
would allow a little more creativity by enforcement authorities-e.g. "pick up dog poop in the
parks" sorta thing.
Good luck. We're all in this together!
If animal is under control fetching it playing frisbee should be acceptable.
It's seems unnecessarily strict and likely won't be uniformly enforced.
I generally find excessive ordinances burdensome as I cant remember them all. I tend to feel
less relaxed going out in communal spaces when I feel like I'll accidentally violate some
ordinance. However, if this is very important to the people of Golden valley then I'm not
offended by it, I just hope we are thoughtful about if it's really necessary. (I havent had any
problems with dogs off lead)
I am a lifelong resident of GV. I bought my home from my folks who bought it in 1957. More
rules and ordinances are not necessary in my opinion. I have had a dog all my life and there
are no issues. The issues I would bet are the handful of folks who constantly complain
whether legitimate or not. I have more issues with pet owners who think my setback
property is a community park. Oh and my mother ran the GV Animal Humane Society(Animal
Rescue League) from 1958-68!
It is my belief that the burden to be responsible and considerate falls on the pet owner.
An aggressive dog will be aggressive on or off-leash and in my experience, most incidents
occur not because a dog isn't leashed, but because an untrained dog has escaped from a
home/yard and does not listen to the owner's commands to return.
Generally, dog owners who are comfortable with their dogs being off-leash have spent a
great deal of time training their dogs so they can reap the benefits of getting exercise while
unrestrained.
please leash all dogs. Is common sense safety for us all.
Who cares the length as long as they're on a leash.
I am a dog owner and always have my dogs leashed while outside of our fenced yard. All
dogs should be leashed, even those that can be controlled via "voice command". Even good
dogs can be unpredictable at times.
Pet Leash Ordinance Community Input Report Page 38
Leashes should only be required if other people are nearby. Also not necessary if dog is sitting
or lying down.
Since I answered "no" to question 1, logic would suggest the question about leash length is
not relevant to me. But since the survey requires a response, I chose no.
I believe that non-aggressive, well behaved dogs that are closely supervised should be
allowed off leash in certain public spaces, provided that there are no other people using the
space at that time, or if people using the space at that time also have pets and all parties
agree they are comfortable allowing the dogs to play together off leash.
In general, if a dog is well behaved and an owner is conscientious and responsible, we should
allow for reasonable off leash flexibility while respecting the space, comfort and safety of
others.
Expandable leash should be just fine.
None
This is an important issues since there have been a number if incidents where dogs have
behaved inappropriately off leash.
I love both dogs and cats - I would love to have some off-leash areas. Unfortunately, there
are people who are unable to control their dogs who let them off-leash in public. With kids
and other pets around, it can be frightening to encounter a friendly or assertive dog that may
behave in a way that appears aggressive. We have some neighbors who can barely control
their dogs on leashes, so let's be safe.
Let dogs run if safe
Add a poop clean-up requirement to the ordinance, too.
I support this ordinance because it will help keep pets and community members safe.
I would like to see some limitations on front yard invisible fence. I pass by several houses
that a dog comes barreling out across the lawn while I'm walking by and I never know if he is
going to stop or not....I would prefer if invisible fence was allowed in backyard only, but
perhaps the invisible fence could be a ways back (20' plus?) from the curb? My dog can feel
threatened when a dog come running towards us and we never know if it will stop. I have a
large dog and if she feels threatened, it could cause a fight even though she is very docile,
non-confrontational, and loves to play with other dogs.
Pet Leash Ordinance Community Input Report Page 39
I am in favor of enforcing the leash requirement. I am a dog lover and former dog owner.
I see many unleashed dogs in my North Tyrol neighborhood. I have been growled at,jumped
on,
had clean clothes and jackets stained by nuzzling dogs. The owners just seem to smile and
say, "Don't worry, he's really friendly." Maybe it would be OK to let well trained ones loose
to chase balls in open, empty spaces. Expanding leashes would be OK if they pulled them
short when passing others. Thanks for addressing this!
Should be able to play ball or frisbee with dogs as long as they are under control.
If a dog is not aggressive and in recreation with owner -ie. ball throwing/retrieving then okay
w/o leash. Enforce dog pickup responsibility.
A well behaved dog that is on verbal commands should be able to play fetch off leash when
no other dogs are around. I have used parks to practice obedience training. Can't do that in
a dog park because many unknown dogs will gather around.
Don't ruin it for everyone.
Must be on leash at ALL times (exception inside a fenced yard)
I walk my dog without a leash. She responds to me by voice command. BUT I know my dog
and I leash her whenever we see another dog coming down the road. She is afraid of other
dogs because of being attacked by a dog that was off leash in a yard. I don't let my dog run
all over other peoples yards. I am against the retractable leashes not matter what. I'm more
concerned about people not picking up their dog feces. I'm disgusted by the amount that is
at the parks here in Golden Valley.
Responsible owners bring their dogs to the park to play catch and frisbee, this should
continue to be allowed. First voting against a dog park and now considering restricting dogs
being able to run and exercise? What if you live in an apartment or have a small yard? I am
very against this. I go for multiple walks in the park weekly and pass owners playing catch
with their dog and have never had any issues. Create an amenity for pets if you are
considering removing one. This does not strengthen the community.
Retractable leashes should be acceptable. More often than not, others are not within that
distance when out for a walk. It should be the dog owner responsibility to restrict the leash
when approaching people on trails.
We need a dog park or designated off leash areas.
Pedestrians should be safe from unleashed dogs.
Pet Leash Ordinance Community Input Report Page 40
we are all very allergic to dogs and absolutely do not want dogs to be off leash. thanks
No dog parks, stop bothering pet owners.
Dogs under voice control should be allowed off leash , but fines should be high if an injury
occurs.
owners should be able to use adjustable leashes with locks so they can leave the dogs at end
of leash when no one is close and shorter when people are close by
use adjustable leashes because 6 ft is too much under some circumstances and 10 ft lets the
dog run a bit when no one is around.
Most retractable leashes extend well beyond 6'.
WE love dogs and it is great to have them in the neighborhood. But it is irresponsible for
some It It is very irresponsible of dog owners to let their dogs off leash as they cannot
account for how a leashed dog might react. I am the owner of a dog that is reactive on leash.
It is quite stressful when walking by properties that do not have an invisible fence where dogs
are just left in the yard. Super selfish and irresponsible. I hope this ordinace passes.
Yes dogs are the best, no leashes!13
Ban retractable leashes
It's the owners responsibility to be aware of their dogs ability to be social in public spaces.
Less restrictions but more consequences for people who have dogs that can't handle
themselves.
I would also recommend that dogs may not be allowed to free roam in their own yards
(require a leash, a fence, etc). I've heard many times of dog owners having their dogs off
leash in their yard, only to have the dog run out of the yard and attack another dog being
walked by on the street. These kinds of situations have deterred me from getting a dog.
The leash length is dependent on the activity. Longer leads are used for training in open
spaces.
I understand the issues with having dogs off leash. Maybe only certain hours off leash?
It's not only about the dogs behavior but other dogs and children's reaction to an unleashed
dog running up to them that created anxiety.
Dogs need a little space to run too!
Pet Leash Ordinance Community Input Report Page 41
There's some people who have dogs that are trained to come back. I'd hate to see them lose
that right.
It really should be 6'. While we love dogs, many dog owners are disrespectful with longer
leashes, and its also common in our neighborhood for people to not use leashes at all and let
dogs run deep into others properties. They seem oblivious to the fact many do not like that.
I think the leash length should depend upon the 'public space' for example- downtown
Golden Valley vs one of the city's parks. I would hope people use common sense-a dog that
doesn't response to voice commands for example might always need to be leashed vs a very
obedient dog. A 30 foot length of leash is a nice length to let the dog run and play- but
meanwhile the handler still retains control (and can reel it in/let it out depending up the
surroundings and any perceived risk).
ALSO CATS SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO ROAM - POOP - ETC. We have loads of cats in our
neighborhood that are out an unattended. I find cat poo in my flower and vegetable garden
frequently. Thank you.
Cats should not be allowed to roam around.
I feel this is a must there are so many people with dogs that just run loose or have such a long
list it makes a person scared to walk around and I love dogs
We don't need any more invasive ordinances trying to control public behavior. Leash laws
are not the answer. My dog and myself have been bitten twice by dogs on a 6 foot leash
while we were in public spaces. My dog was leashed when he was bitten and he has been
bitten by dogs both on and of leash. An untrained dog can be dangerous on or off a leash. I
have been scared in the woods by large aggressive dogs on a leash that were barely
restrained by their owners. I would support an ordinance to require pet training classes and
dog socialization.
Under the current ordinance it is fair that police may enforce the rule that dogs must be
under voice control. Non-controlled dogs and their owners should be cited, but those who
are well-controlled should be able to maintain exemption from the rule.
This feels like one or two examples ruining it for everybody else.
Retractable leashes are RETRACTABLE and provide distance control. DO NOT RESTRICT LEASH
LENGTHS.
Pet Leash Ordinance Community Input Report Page 42
We have experienced a MAJOR issue with dogs being uncontrolled on school grounds and in
parks. People think they can take their dog to the school to run free, then they run thru the
neigborhood and are not picked up after.
When the limits do go in, you're going to need a significant communications effort, yard signs
etc.
Biggest issue is clean up after dog.
The problem with dogs off leash lies with the owners that do not keep track of their pet. That
is about 50% in my neighborhood.
I think well-behaved, friendly dogs should be able to be off leash to play fetch in parks, and I
also think flexi-leashes are acceptable for well-behaved dogs.
I walk with my young children and play in Golden Valley's public parks. There have been a
couple occasions where we have encountered others with unleashed dogs whose dogs have
quickly approached my children barking and jumping at them causing fear. Dog owners may
know and trust their dogs but others do not. Leashing makes sure that everyone feels safe.
I use the type of leash that retracts and extends. I retract the leash and heal my dog when
passing other walkers, bikers, and moving cars.
I am a dog owner who spends lots of time out and about with my leased dog. Leash laws are
the best way to keep pets, wildlife, and people safe.
The exception should be made for dog parks, however there should be posted "rules" at the
dog park similar to St. Paul, MN rules
Pets should still be allowed to be off leash if they can be commanded by voice. What I'm
finding is that owners don't socialize their dogs thus causing the issue. If your pet is not
comfortable with other pets that is the true problem. Can you say that you will always be the
person to walk your pet?
What about vacations? or if your pet runs outside the house when the front door opens?
Your pet needs to be socialized.
I walk my dog off leash (it's a small pug) and he's well trained in voice command to sit, stay,
wait, come and easily picked up if need be. I don't have an issue with other pets off leash.
Current rule ( voice control ) works as long as people use it properly.
Pet Leash Ordinance Community Input Report Page 43
Longer length is OK because the owner should be in control of their dog. Also, many leashes
sold are not 6 feet.
Pet owners should be held accountable to clean up their pet waste. We live adjacent to a city
trail, and the feces are horrible! PLEASE POST SIGNS by all city trails, and perhaps have plastic
bags available. (the trail near us is Duluth St., between Flag and Gettysburg)
Longer leashes for tiny dogs would not pose a major problem..
Barking dogs is a far bigger concern for me. My neighbor's dogs bark all day long and drive
me crazy, especially now that I'm spending most of my time in my house. With the warmer
weather, I won't be able to enjoy leaving my windows open and the fresh air because of my
stupid neighbor's dogs.
I think the rationale for this is that many dog owners believe they have control of their pets
but really don't.
The form is not working on question #4, but my answer to that is as follows: A 6 foot leash is
a good length when a dog is on leash, but voice control is adequate when off leash.
I wouldn't mind the 6' if it was actually kept at that, but many dogs are in "my space" doing
what they do at that length. Can't blame the dog. Blame the owner/trainer/walker. Also I
see dogs being exercised just a couple feet away from the walker/runner/owner with good
control, so it can be done.
My dog does obey voice commands and I leash her if any small children, other on leash dogs,
or neighbors I know are fearful of dogs approach. I do not think those of us that have spent
the time and effort to train our dogs should be punished. There are several other off leash
dogs in my neighborhood that are also not an issue.
I'm the owner of an aging dog is is good under voice control, "come" and "stay", and
frequently use a leash when coming across others with leashed dogs until we pass them by.
In my walks in my neighborhood, I've very rarely had issue with any of the scores of dogs
we've encountered that were either on or off leash. I find that many just use a leash because
they may not have pursued the training and discipline to use commands, and that those who
have their dogs off leash, the dogs have been fine encountering my off-leach dog.
I wouldn't want the 20-30 foot wanderings of my off-leash dog, who loves the smalls, to be
limited by others problems. But I also recognize that I'm not aware of such problems, and I do
have empathy for an individual's dramatic issue with some off-leash dog. I'd hope those are
Pet Leash Ordinance Community Input Report Page 44
dealt with on a one-by-one basis rather than having the city have an updated ordinance
penalizing all dogs.
I don't understand why this ordinance is needed. My dog was voice-command trained. Never
a problem.
I can't believe this is a problem but for one or two people.To punish us all because of a few
crabby souls doesn't seem right. I can't believe the huge number of dogs walking on
Brunswick and all are leashed (different lengths) and cleaned up after. If a dog is running lose
it is because he escaped and NO RULES WILL HELP THAT. This makes me very angry for you to
waste time on such unnecessary business!
Please inform pet owners that their pets are not allowed on private property to urinate,
defecate or be allowed to walk on property to explore. I do not want dog's defecating on my
property whether or not they pick up. I have seen pets by my front door, while off lease.
When asking owners, to not allow their dogs on our private property, most are defensive and
have told me to shut up. Only one walker in many many years, has responded, I won't do
that, and hasn't. Thanks
My neighbor's dog has been aggressive and threatening. It has even has left the neighbor's
lawn and charged onto our property, frightening us. It came dangerously close to a moving
automobile in our own driveway. Please require leashes on private lawns, too, unless there is
a reliable fence to restrain the dog.
12 foot leash except when others are in close proximity, then 6 feet. But some animals are
very docile and obedient and do not need to be leashed at all times. The pet policy should
address bird killing by free roaming cats. If dogs should be on leashes, so should cats.
Consideration should made for dogs under control of an electronic leash
Comfortable with pets controlled by voice commands
Pets off-leash creates too much risk when mixed with pedestrian and vehicle traffic. While
driving a vehicle it is impossible to tell if someone has their pet under voice command or if
the pet will jump out into traffic lanes.
Enforce the laws about cleaning up after all pets.
I think it should be based on complaints verifiable complaints about owner/dog. Meaning if
the owner has no control over dog or dog is aggressive and/or has a history of aggression.
Majority of dogs I have come in contact with have no issue whether on or off lease. Do not let
the few ruin the fun for the many.
Pet Leash Ordinance Community Input Report Page 45
I think the leash laws should stay the same in Golden Valley with the addition of voice
commands keeping keeping dogs within 6 feet and or electronic collars with the same effect.
Thank you!
? I think most responsible dog owners know that poorly behaved dogs are not a product of a
bad dog, but of an irresponsible owner. Changing the law doesn't make bad owners better, it
simply punishes responsible owners. I ask you this question, are you listening to the loudest,
whiniest voices or you listening to the majority of the voices that are quietest? There are a
lot of dog owners in Golden Valley and I believe by far the majority are responsible.
I have lived in Golden Valley for 23 years. I have owned a dog all 23 years. I have an
extremely well behaved, professionally trained dog. Golden Valley is a great city and a
wonderful city to walk your dog. The current leash law is great and it doesn't need "fixing."
Please consider how the majority of the responsible dog owners in the city feel about the law
and don't restrict our freedom to enjoy one of the best pastimes know to humankind:
walking your dog.
"Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a
way around the laws."
— Plato
"The more laws and restrictions there are, The poorer people become."
— Lao Tzu
People take advantage of the current leash law and the off leash dogs are getting out of
control in GV. I am constantly seeing posts on the next door app about people being charged
by off leash dogs. This is a huge problem and I personally will not walk my dogs in golden
valley. I am even constantly on alert with dog deter any spray when my dogs simply go
outside to go potty on a leash. This is getting way out of control, especially with the
quarantine. Something needs to be done NOW.
Pet Leash Ordinance Community Input Report Page 46
Unless a yard is fenced in, I'd like to see dogs leashed when others are present or in the
owner's arms.
There's just too much variation in owners and how they perceive their dogs temperament
and training.
I'd also like to see a push to have dog owners not allow their pets to poop and pee in other
residents yards or along park trails where houses back up to the parks. GV neighborhoods are
seeing more and more families with children move in, and no parent wants to deal with a
child encountering an unexpected dog pie while playing. Obviously, this issue is far less
concerning than any person getting chased or bitten by a dog off leash.
I would fully support an exemption to the leash law provided residents can demonstrate
(submit a video or through neighbor endorseement or both?) that dogs off leash can be
controlled through voice command. I have three neighbors with extemely well behaved and
disciplined dogs and one who says her dog is trained, but the dog runs in and out of the
street and has been hit by a car...thankfully okay. So I would continue this as an exemption
(privilege) for those pet owners who are uber responsible for their pets and respectful of
their neighbors. I like the idea of neighbor sponsors or endorsements because they know
the dogs and their owners. Thanks.
Wayyy to many dogs being excersized without a leash. This must stop!
I live adjacent to Medley Park, and for years have seen loose dogs that clearly aren't under
their Owners' voice commands.
There are far too many unleashed dogs in my neighborhood and surrounding area, which
have come after myself and my dog while on a walk. There needs to be action taken and real
consequences for those who do not follow these laws.
Please make sure dogs are leashed.
Off leash dogs are a huge safety issue in GV
Just yesterday, a barking dog ran at me, my husband and 21 month old child while we were
taking a walk. The dogs apparently stopped at the invisible fence. But let me tell you
something, when a dog is running at me while I have my child It is scary. I am not thinking "
I'm sure there's an invisible fence" or "the owner must be close by and the dog responds to
voice command". My concern is for my child who is now scared and crying. I don't think my
child's freedom should suffer so that a dog can run wild and free.There are dog parks for
that. People can fence their homes. The off-lease dogs are causing more harm than good.
Pet Leash Ordinance Community Input Report Page 47
My dog was attacked by a dog off leash late last summer. A leash law could have prevented
this.
I agree with the current law "Dogs restrained by voice commands as effectively as a leash are
exempt from the leash rule"
6 feet is fine when walking if necessary, but it would be helpful to allow 30 foot lines in
parks/large grass spaces when training a dog.
Although some pets do well with voice command, there have been too many instances on my
street where it doesn't work when the animals become distracted or aren't trained well
enough.
A dog ran after me and scared me in my own yard and didn't obey voice commands from it's
owner.
Arlo - 7yrs
My dog is always leashed, I wouldn't trust him to not run after squirrels and bunnies.
We have had unleashed dogs come after us in the park, from yards, and even from yards
marked with signs indicating an invisible fence. Many dogs do not follow the owners voice
commands, at least with distractions.
Dogs that are demonstrably controlled by voice command alone SHOULD continue to be
exempted from leash law. There are amazingly well behaved dogs and a simple
demonstration could be performed instantly on request to give evidence. In some cases such
as in crowds or on sidewalks a leash is actually a greater hazard for tripping and
entanglements. Requiring a leash of trained and well behaved dogs punishes both the owner
and the dog psychologically and discourages the sort of behavioral training that should in fact
be encouraged.
Voice command is every bit as effective in controlling a dog. And to say one size fits all or
please the lowest common denominator is totally unfair to all tax payers of the community.
Pet Leash Ordinance Community Input Report Page 48
APPENDIX A
Social Media Reach and Engagement
city of
go l d e n��
valley
Page 49
SOCIAL MEDIA REACH AND ENGAGEMENT
Pet Leash Ordinance
Reach = Number of people who saw the post
Engagement = Number of people who interacted with the post
Facebook 1466 469 11 3 24
Twitter 313 8 2 1 0
Comments
Stacy Pawlowski I'd like to know more about why this is being revisited. I'm concerned about
Pampuch requirements on private property mentioned at the end of the linked page, as I
think it has a lot to do with proximity to other structures, property lines and
streets/sidewalks.
Donna Taylor Pets on a leash at all times when in public. For the safety of the pet but other
and other pets! You may have a well behaved pet off leash however I have a pet
whom doesn't not care to be approached. He is always leashed, but it is an issue
when others don't. As far as personal property if the animal stays on that
property I have not issues of free roam.This is not the case in about 70%time. I
take my pet to off leash park or my back yard if I want it to have free roam. Yes
that requires time driving and scheduling, but that is what Dog parks are for! As
a pet owner I get angry at others dog poo in my yard because I am responsible
and clean up.
Don Taylor I live in the super high density housing area along 394.Talo has a dedicated dog
park and nobody uses it.They walk their dogs (read: use their cellphones) and
pay no attention to where the dog goes—while on the leash. I'm tired of dogs
peeing and pooping in my yard. I confronted one of them recently. He threw up
his arms and said he didn't have any bags. WTH?
Paul Testa Don Taylor my man has a service dog He is in a mobile scooter he had no use of
his legs. And can't walk. ZHe literally crawls on his knees to pick up mess from his
service dog, what are other dog owners excuses for not picking up poop etc.??
No bags. Or lazy?? Come on stop and think before you walk your dog outdoors
with your good legs. it's all irritating when I hear or see this in writing in Fb.
People don't like dog parks for many reasons, our Vet asked us not to take him
to dog park,it's a great place for dogs to get hurt or sickness.
Molly Rose I'm fine with requiring leashes in public (unless in a place like the nonexistent
dog park or whatever) but I'm a bit confused about the private property
restrictions. If a dog is off leash on its owner's property, that's not the city's
issue. Also, encouraging or requiring electric fences is awful; please do not.
Justin Zollar What an absolute disaster city. War on dogs for no reason at all.
Liz Burwell Uhhhh good luck with that,the city doesn't even enforce animals who are
nuisances currently..
Stephen Dent I think the current law is working well and there is no need to change the law
because some people cannot control their dogs when they are off-leash. Golden
Valley does not have a year round off leash park. Sometimes, I walk my dogs
along a Bassett Creek path when there is no one else around, off leash.They are
extremely well behaved and I obey the 6 feel rule and they come the moment I
call them. Why punish everyone when some people cannot control their dogs
and do not give their dog obedience training like I did.And besides as one
person commented, Golden Valley does a horrible job enforcing its current dog
barking ordinance. How will it ever control the small number of times a person
takes their dog off a leash.What a waste of police time and energy.lnstead, I
wish they would do something about the speeding on St. Croix Avenue North.
That is a really dangerous situation, but no police action or even a discussion to
put a stop sign or speed bumps between Lilac Drive and Douglas Drive.It's like a
speedway, even with school buses.
Alicia Maria Kopp I'm a bit confused as to what the problem is? In public spaces dogs are either on
a leash that is a set length or retractable, unless they are off leash reliable, right?
My Bailey has been gone for a full year end of this month. But she was off-leash
reliable. She had a lot of pride in her off leash walks. We didn't always take off
leash walks because once fall and winter hit, she was all about the cold weather
and rolling in leaves and snow.
Sheryl Cummings Alicia Maria Kopp I agree.We had an extremely reliable off-leash dog and every
time I ever encountered an issue with another dog, they were always
appropriately leashed, but untrained or handled by someone who was distracted
or just flat out disregarding of the people around them.
People like that aren't going to suddenly change by creating more ordinances for
those who are already being respectful of the laws and their neighbors. ED
Alicia Maria Kopp Sheryl Cummings We never had any issues with other dogs while on walks.This
community is amazingly dog friendly and eager. And the etiquette for
introducing dogs to one another is something you learn quickly. I really would
like to know what is prompting this kind of updates to the pet leashing
ordinance. Is there a problem or is this busy-bodying?
Sheryl Cummings Alicia Maria Kopp that's what my question is as well
Justin Zollar If GV doesn't have a single dog park, then they cant require pets to be leashed at
all times.
Steve Johnson Justin Zollar Yes, they can.
David D. Axtell I wish we'd commit to a dog park, leave private property alone, and have better
enforcement of what we have on the books. Comments elsewhere suggest that
is the real problem.
Stephen Boyd Justin Zollar It's probably the same NIMBY neighbors that helped kill off the dog
park that are now whining about unleashed dogs. a
Christine Nelson Justin Zollar I'd love to see a dog park added for my pups, but either way I think
it's best to keep pets on leash in public areas. Not sure what is being
recommended for private property though.
Stephen Boyd David D. Axtell Getting a dog park will take citizens banding together to lobby for
one...and not just two or three people.
Justin Zollar Taking your dog to an open field and throwing a ball should not be illegal.
Edwin Sweeney Should always be leashed when in public.
Tj Beagan Don't tell me how to control my pet on my private property.
Eric Simpson The description in the article says zero about your private property. Where did
you get that it could affect you that way?
Tj Beagan Eric Simpson I will re-read, but thought something about impacting how pets are
controlled at homes.
Steven Stewart fine with me
Feb 27, 2020
PLATFORM
Facebook 807 71 2 0 2
Twitter 237 4 0 0 0
Anne Dykstra I also think there should be a rule that owners carry a bag and scoop to carry
away the remains of their dogs droppings when it's done on private property.
My corner planting of ground cover around my flowering crab tree is used by
owners to let their dog take a poop quite often. It means I do the clean up and I
hate it. And...it's no good just to let it be as it draws pests and smells bad.
Anne Dykstra Thank you Laura!
March 1 1
Facebook 7286
44 0 0 0
Twitter 7 41 0 0 1
bing ::How about a survey on lowering residential speed limits instead! The time is
now, Mpls wasted no time to lower theirs. This is way past due!