06-01-21 City Council AgendaREGULAR MEETING AGENDA
This meeting will be held via Webex in accordance with the local emergency declaration made by
the City under Minn. Stat. § 12.37. The public may monitor this meeting by watching on Comcast
cable channel 16, by streaming on CCXmedia.org, or by calling 1-415-655-0001 and entering the
meeting code 133 435 0755. The public may participate in this meeting during public comment
sections, including the public forum beginning at 6:20 pm, by calling 763-593-8060. Additional
information about monitoring electronic meetings is available on the City website. For technical
assistance, please contact the City at 763-593-8007 or webexsupport@goldenvalleymn.gov. If
you incur costs to call into the meeting, you may submit the costs to the City for reimbursement
consideration.
1.Call to Order
A.Pledge of Allegiance Pages
B.Roll Call
C.Proclamation Honoring LGBTQ+ Month – June 1-30, 2021 3-5
2.Additions and Corrections to Agenda
3.Consent Agenda
Approval of Consent Agenda - All items listed under this heading are considered to be routine
by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no discussion of these
items unless a Council Member so requests in which event the item will be removed from the
general order of business and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda.
A.Approval of City Check Register 6
B.Boards, Commissions, and Task Forces:
1.Receive and File Meeting Minutes – Environmental Commission – April 26, 2021 7-11
C.Grants and Donations:
1.Approve Resolution No. 21-40 – Accepting the Coronavirus Local Fiscal Recovery
Fund Established Under the American Rescue Plan Act
12-16
2.Approve Resolution 21-41 - Accepting Donations of $1000 from the Maynard family 17-18
D.Authorize the Mayor and City Manager to Sign Amended PUD Permits – Carousel Auto
1.Amended PUD Permit for Carousel Automobiles PUD Permit No. 95, Amendment #4 19-23
2.Amended PUD Permit for Carousel Automobiles PUD Permit No. 95, Amendment #5 24-28
4.Public Hearing
A.Public Hearing - Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) General Permit, Storm
Water Pollution Prevention Program, 2020 Annual Report to the Minnesota Pollution
Control Agency, Resolution No. 21-42
29-31
June 1, 2021 – 6:30 pm
Meeting Held Virtually
City of Golden Valley City Council Regular Meeting
June 1, 2021 – 6:30 pm
2
B. Public Hearing – Amendments to the Zoning Map – Rezoning Properties to Achieve
Conformance with the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, Ordinance No. 715
32-61
C. Public Hearing – Amendments to the Future Land Use and Zoning Maps – Reguiding and
Rezoning Properties at the General Mills James Ford Bell Research Center to Achieve
Conformance with the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, Ordinance No. 716 and Resolution No.
21-43
62-85
5. Old Business
6. New Business
All Ordinances listed under this heading are eligible for public input.
A. Authorization to Sign Amended PUD Permit – General Mills PUD No. 83, Amendment #5 86-88
B. Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Commission:
1. Second Consideration of Ordinance No. 714 - Amending City Code Chapter 2 -
Replacing the Human Rights Commission with a Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
Commission
2. Approve Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Commission Bylaws
3. Approve Resolution No. 21-44 - Approve Summary Publication of Ordinance No. 714
4. Approve Initial Appointments to the Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Commission
89-100
C. Review of Council Calendar 101
D. Mayor and Council Communications
1. Other Committee/Meeting updates
7. Adjournment
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
June 1, 2021
Agenda Item
1. C. Proclamation Honoring LGBTQ+ Month – June 1-30, 2021
Prepared By
Tim Cruikshank, City Manager
Summary
June is celebrated as celebrated as Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer (LGBTQ+) Pride
Month. The purpose of the month is to recognize the contributions made by members of the
LGBTQ+ community and to actively promote the principles of equality, liberty, and justice. The
proclamation also calls upon the entire community to work together to promote equal rights and
eliminate prejudice everywhere it exists.
Christopher Robinson, PRIDE Committee, and Dean Penk, Golden Valley Community Foundation,
will be in attendance.
Supporting Documents
• Proclamation Honoring LGBTQ+ Month – June 1-30, 2021 (2 pages)
CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY
PROCLAMATION HONORING LGBTQ+ PRIDE MONTH
JUNE 1 - 30, 2021
WHEREAS, the month of June is celebrated as Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual,
Transgender, Queer (LGBTQ+) Pride Month, commemorating the historic 1969
Stonewall Riots in New York City and the first Pride march in New York in June 1970;
and
WHEREAS, Pride Month brings awareness to historic and present day
discrimination, harassment, and violence toward individuals who identify as LGBTQ+;
and
WHEREAS, Pride Month affirms the dignity, equal rights and visibility of
individuals who identify as LGBTQ+; builds community, and celebrates sexual identity
diversity and gender variance; and
WHEREAS, LGBTQ+ people have made, and continue to make, great and
lasting contributions that strengthen the fabric of society; and
WHEREAS, all people deserve to live with dignity and respect, free from fear and
violence, and protected against discrimination, regardless of their gender identity or
sexual orientation; and
WHEREAS, celebrating Pride Month influences awareness and provides support
and advocacy for the LGBTQ+ community, and is an opportunity to take action and
engage in dialogue to strengthen alliances, build acceptance, and advance equal rights;
and
WHEREAS, the City of Golden Valley includes the LGBTQ+ community as a part
of its commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion; and
WHEREAS, on July 30, 2013, the City of Golden Valley Human Rights
Commission passed Resolution No. 13-1 Acknowledging the Minnesota Marriage
Equality Act of 2013; and
WHEREAS, on March 4, 2020, the City of Golden Valley passed a Proclamation
Opposing the Practice of Conversion Therapy; and
WHEREAS, the City of Golden Valley calls upon the community to work together
to promote equal rights and eliminate prejudice everywhere it exists.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of
Golden Valley does hereby proclaim June 2021 as LGBTQ+ Pride Month and call upon
the people of Golden Valley to recognize the contributions made by members of the
LGBTQ+ community and to actively promote the principles of equality, liberty, and
justice.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the seal of
the City of Golden Valley to be affixed on this 1st day of June, 2021.
___________________________
Shepard M. Harris, Mayor
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
June 1, 2021
Agenda Item
3. A. Approval of City Check Register
Prepared By
Sue Virnig, Finance Director
Summary
Approval of the check register for various vendor claims against the City of Golden Valley.
Financial Or Budget Considerations
The check register has a general ledger code as to where the claim is charged. At the end of the
register is a total amount paid by fund.
Recommended Action
Motion to authorize the payment of the bills as submitted.
Supporting Documents
Document is located on city website at the following location:
http://weblink.ci.golden-valley.mn.us/WebLink/Browse.aspx?id=876916&dbid=0&repo=GoldenValley
The check register for approval:
• 05-28-21 Check Register
REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
This meeting will be held via Cisco Webex in accordance with the local emergency declaration made by
the City under Minn. Stat. § 12.37. The public may monitor this meeting by calling 1-415-655-0001 and
entering the meeting code 177 393 4642. For technical assistance, please contact support staff at 763-
593-8007 or webexsupport@goldenvalleymn.gov. If you incur costs to call into the meeting, you may
submit the costs to the City for reimbursement consideration. Additional information about for
monitoring electronic meetings is available on the City website.
1. Call to Order
The meeting was called to order by Chair Seys at 6:30.
2. Roll Call
Commissioners present: Scott Seys, Debra Yahle, Tonia Galonska, Jim Stremel, Dawn Hill, Shannon
Hansen, Wendy Weirich
Commissioners absent: Felix Fettig
Council Members present: Larry Fonnest
Staff present: Eric Eckman, Environmental Resources Supervisor;
Drew Chirpich, Environmental Specialist;
Story Schwantes, Green Corp Member;
Carrie Nelson, Administrative Assistant.
3. Approval of Agenda
MOTION by Commissioner Galonska, seconded by Commissioner Hill to approve the agenda for April
26, 2021 and the motion carried.
4. Approval of March 22, 2021 Regular Meeting Minutes
MOTION by Commissioner Stremel, seconded by Commissioner Hansen to approve the minutes of
March 22, 2021 as submitted and the motion carried.
5. Old Business
A. EC/HRC Environmental Justice
i. Inequity Factors Weighted
1. 75% Social Factors
a. Affordable Housing – 40%
b. Lower Home Values – 25%
c. High Rentership – 10%
2. 25% Environmental Factors
a. Less Tree Canopy – 15%
b. More impervious Spaces – 10%
April 26, 2021 – 6:30 pm
City of Golden Valley Environmental Commission Regular Meeting
April 26, 2020 – 6:30 pm
2
ii. The subcommittee divided the City into 4 areas – NW, NE, SW, and SE – and performed a
field investigation. Findings include:
1. NW – No Immediate opportunities noted. Some greening with new development
along Winnetka possible.
a. Areas in the far NW are both businesses and some residential with close
access to the Medley Hills Park area
b. The area in the east of the quadrant appears to have close access to the
Pennsylvania Woods area
2. SW - Possible projects on private property at far west of quadrant. Better park
access and/or green space at Valley View Apartments also possible.
a. Golden Valley Road/169/Decatur area includes apartments surrounded by
industry with some tree separation; May be opportunity here, but on
private land.
b. Going west from Winnetka to Wisconsin/Boone south of 10th Avenue
North is apartments surrounded by impervious surfaces; Opportunities
here to increase access to Bassett Creek potentially.
c. Calvary Center Cooperative off of Rhode Island has a lot of impervious
surface, but fair number of trees.
d. Valley View Apartments on Golden Valley Road near Douglas has open
areas conducive to private land projects; Trees surround area, but not
very usable; Of note is Seeman Park across GV Rd.
3. SE - No immediate, easy opportunities noted due to impervious surfaces. Some
green space added to apartment complex facilities may be a possibility.
a. Apartments with a lot of surface area and impervious surfaces.
b. Valley Village Apartments in upper quadrant have access to Luce Line Trail
and Schaper Pond.
c. NOTE: Lower air quality issues in Xenia area.
d. NOTE: Interest from Open Space and Recreation Commission in work in
this area. Work along with them here? Add a small neighborhood park?
4. NE - Limited opportunities noted due to impervious surfaces with the possible
exception of connections to trails and St. Croix Park in upper portion of quadrant.
a. Apartment complexes on St. Croix Ave N with a lot of impervious surfaces
(and shopping center) surrounding the area; Possible longer term connect
to area trails and St. Croix Park.
b. Apartment complexes on Douglas Drive with some impervious surfaces,
but little opportunity.
c. NOTE: Remnant Parcel & Unimproved ROW #113 an opportunity?
iii. Should we add Air Quality Index to the Environmental Factors we’re looking at on the
maps using the MPCA Air Pollution Score?
1. Score below 1 considered Good. All of Golden Valley is higher than 1.
a. Northern Part of the City is in the 2.0-2.9 range
b. Further South, near I-394, is higher 3.0-3.9 and over 4.0 in SLP.
2. Bring to the sub-group to discuss modifying the map to include air quality index.
City of Golden Valley Environmental Commission Regular Meeting
April 26, 2020 – 6:30 pm
3
B. Hennepin County Climate Action Plan
i. Aims to achieve net zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050 with an interim goal of
reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 45% from 2010 levels by 2030.
ii. Hennepin County’s goals are more ambitious than the State of MN’s goals and position
Hennepin County as a leader on addressing climate change in the Upper Midwest.
iii. The board has established a new Director of Climate and Resiliency position.
MOTION by Commissioner Hill, seconded by Commissioner Weirich to pass a resolution of
support to approve the Hennepin County Climate Action Plan as it is currently drafted and
recommend to the Council they work with Hennepin County to help implement the plan and
look for areas of alignment and partnership and the motion carried.
C. 2020 Annual Report and 2021 Work Plan
i. Presented to the Council on April 13th at the Council Manager Meeting and they were
very supportive. It was formally received and filed on April 20.
ii. Should there be a small sub-committee formed to explore partnership with area schools.
Maybe figure out as a group exactly what the partnership should be before reaching out
to the schools.
iii. Items from the 2021 Work Plan that should be looked at first:
1. Curbside Recycling and Organics
2. PIE
3. Community Outreach (Environmental Justice/Climate Justice, Schools)
4. Environmental Resources Needs
5. Zero Waste Event
6. New Business
A. Stormwater Permit & Program
i. The City of GV just resubmitted its MS4 (Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System)
application to the MPCA. The MS4 Permit allows municipalities and other organizations
to operate storm sewer systems, and outlines requirements for doing so, with an
emphasis on keeping phosphorus and other pollutants out of sewer systems and
waterbodies.
1. Now that it’s submitted, once accepted by the MPCA it will be posted for public
comments through the State website. The City will share this on the City website
and social media.
ii. Communities now need to take additional measures to track and report all salt use in
municipal operations, train staff on salt use, draft and integrate a pet waste ordinance,
identify, target and reduce bacteria sources, provide more documentation and metrics,
and educate the public more on topics pertaining to water quality.
iii. We have one year to develop and update the stormwater program, including updates to
city code.
City of Golden Valley Environmental Commission Regular Meeting
April 26, 2020 – 6:30 pm
4
B. Program/Project Updates
i. DeCola Ponds SEA School – Wildwood Park Flood Reduction Study
1. A couple rounds of community engagement. Received a lot of good feedback.
2. Working closely with the Bassett Creek Watershed Commission.
3. 3 different concept plans developed based on community input in 2020.
4. Will have a feasibility report within the next couple of months.
5. Flooded Structures
a. During a 10-year event – Reduce flood risk for 3 homes
b. During a 100-year event – Reduce flood risk for 10 homes
6. Some trees going to be “lost,” could be transplanted to other areas. Spruce and
Pines were recently planted and could be moved.
7. New trees will be planted in other areas to replace removed trees. Hopefully a
1:1 replacement.
8. Some areas are wetter that will have wetland/shoreland plantings.
9. Prairie habitat is drier down by the school.
10. Challenging to find spaces to create flood storage and lower flood levels in fully
developed cities – GV, New Hope, and Crystal.
11. Comments from the community said save pickleball, wooded hills, sledding hill,
and playground.
12. Benefit for the community and the school with the outdoor educational aspect.
ii. Medley Park Stormwater Improvement Study
1. In the engineering feasibility stage. Working closely with the Bassett Creek
Watershed Commission. Will go to the Watershed Commission in May/June.
2. 3 different concept plans developed based on community input late last fall.
3. Feedback showed people were excited for more water features, diverse ecology
and trail routes in the western portion.
4. Ball field will go away. No dog park being added. More area for flood storage.
Dozens of properties that flood near this park.
5. Improve water quality in Medicine Lake and other bodies of water downstream
and also reduce flood levels for homes nearby.
C. Council Updates
i. Thanks to all the Commission Members who sought reappointment. There will be no
new members in the upcoming year. Council is very impressed with the 2021 Work Plan.
D. Other Business
i. May meeting is traditionally a business meeting with the elections of the Chair and Vice
Chair and reviewing by-laws and doing some re-orientation of values and commitment
to equity.
7. Adjournment
MOTION by Commissioner Yahle, seconded by Commissioner Galonska to adjourn the meeting at
8:24 pm and the motion carried.
ATTEST:
City of Golden Valley Environmental Commission Regular Meeting
April 26, 2020 – 6:30 pm
5
_________________________________ _______________________________________
Carrie Nelson, Administrative Assistant Scott Seys, Chair
Golden Valley Council Manager Meeting
June 1, 2021
Agenda Item
3. C. 1. Approve Resolution No. 21-40 Accepting the Coronavirus Local Fiscal Recovery Fund
Established Under the American Rescue Plan Act
Prepared By
Sue Virnig, Finance Director
Summary
Congress adopted the American Rescue Plan Act in March 2021 (“ARPA”) which included $65 billion in
recovery funds for cities across the county. The US Treasury provided guidelines for each city to follow
while thinking about ways to use the funds.
The MN COVID-19 Response Accountability Office will be the responsible party to submit the monies to
each City. Golden Valley is a non-entitlement city because it has a population under 50,000. It was also
one of the 47 cities that was left of the list of Minnesota Cities. The rate may be from $100 to $105
dollars per capita. The City will be sent an award letter that will be added as an Exhibit A in the
resolution.
Unlike the CRF funds through the CARES Act, these funds are available through December 31, 2024. As
staff and council review the 2022-2023 Budget and 2022-2031 Capital Improvement Program more
projects may be defined that would benefit the City of Golden Valley residents and businesses.
Staff will keep reviewing the US Treasury guidance because they do periodically add new items. Staff
will be attending many meetings where discussions on what can be funded by the monies received.
Each project will be brought back to council and approved before the monies are spent.
Financial Or Budget Considerations
The resolution attached refers to the responsible party to submit the estimated amount of $2.2 million
over the next two years. The first payment will come after June 11 or may be delayed by 30 days due
to an evaluation of formula and the second payment would be received one year later. The formula
includes the amount per capita multiplied by the population in 2019.
Recommended Action
Motion to approve the Resolution No. 21-40 To Accept the Coronavirus Local Fiscal Recovery Fund
Established under the American Rescue Plan Act.
City Council Meeting Executive Summary
City of Golden Valley
June 1, 2021
2
Supporting Documents
• Resolution No. 21-40 Resolution No. 21-40 To Accept the Coronavirus Local Fiscal Recovery
Fund Established under the American Rescue Plan Act (3 pages)
RESOLUTION NO. 21-40
RESOLUTION TO ACCEPT THE CORONAVIRUS LOCAL FISCAL RECOVERY
FUND ESTABLISHED UNDER THE AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT
WHEREAS, since the first case of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was discovered in the
United States in January 2020, the disease has infected over 32 million and killed over 575,000
Americans (“Pandemic”). The disease has impacted every part of life: as social distancing
became a necessity, businesses closed, schools transitioned to remote education, travel was
sharply reduced, and millions of Americans lost their jobs;
WHEREAS, as a result of the Pandemic cities have been called on to respond to the needs of
their communities through the prevention, treatment, and vaccination of COVID-19.
WHEREAS, city revenues, businesses and nonprofits in the city have faced economic impacts
due to the Pandemic.
WHEREAS, Congress adopted the American Rescue Plan Act in March 2021 (“ARPA”) which
included $65 billion in recovery funds for cities across the country.
WHEREAS, ARPA funds are intended to provide support to state, local, and tribal governments
in responding to the impact of COVID-19 and in their efforts to contain COVID-19 in their
communities, residents, and businesses.
WHEREAS, the MN COVID-19 Response Accountability Office will allocate to the City of
Golden Valley (“City”) pursuant to the ARPA (“Allocation”) on or after June 11, 2021. The
Exhibit A will be attached once received.
WHEREAS, the United States Department of Treasury has adopted guidance regarding the use
of ARPA funds.
WHEREAS, the City, in response to the Pandemic, has had expenditures and anticipates future
expenditures consistent with the Department of Treasury’s ARPA guidance.
WHEREAS, the State of Minnesota will distribute ARPA funds to the City because its
population is less than 50,000.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
GOLDEN VALLEY, MINNESOTA AS FOLLOWS:
1. The City intends to collect its share of ARPA funds from the State of Minnesota to use in
a manner consistent with the Department of Treasury’s guidance.
2. City staff, together with the Mayor and the City Manager are hereby authorized to take
any actions necessary to receive the City’s share of ARPA funds from the State of
Minnesota for expenses incurred because of the Pandemic.
3. City staff, together with the Mayor and the City Manager are hereby authorized to make
recommendations to the City Council for future expenditures that may be reimbursed
with ARPA funds.
Adopted by the City Council of Golden Valley, Minnesota this 1st day of June, 2021.
Shepard M. Harris, Mayor
ATTEST:
Theresa Schyma, City Clerk
EXHIBIT A
Attach Letter from MN COVID-19 Response Accountability Office of Award
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
June 1, 2021
Agenda Item
3. C. 2. Approve Resolution No. 21-41 Accepting Donations of $1000 from the Maynard family
Prepared By
Sue Virnig, Finance Director
John Crelly, Fire Chief
Summary
Golden Valley Fire Department received a donation from the Maynard Family for their response to the
fire at Valley View Apartments. They wanted to show their appreciation with this donation to help in
any way.
A resolution will need to be approved per Minnesota Statute 465.03 which allows cities to accept
grants and donations of real or personal property.
Financial Or Budget Considerations
The donation of $1000 will be used to provide the fire department supplies to fight fires.
Recommended Action
Motion to adopt Resolution No. 21-41 Accepting a Donation of $1000 from the Maynard Family.
Supporting Documents
• Resolution No. 21-41 Approve Accepting a Donation of $1000 (1 page)
RESOLUTION NO. 21-41
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE DONATION OF $1000 FROM THE
MAYNARD FAMILY
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution 04-20 on March 16, 2004, which
established a policy for the receipt of gifts; and
WHEREAS, the Resolution states that a gift of real or personal property must be
accepted by the City Council by resolution and be approved by a two-thirds majority of
the Council. A cash donation must be acknowledged and accepted by motion with a
simple majority, and
WHEREAS, the donation of monies to help further the goodwill for the fire
department, and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council accept the following
donations on behalf of its citizens:
$1000.00
Adopted by the City Council of Golden Valley, Minnesota this 1st day of June, 2021.
___________________________________________________
Shepard M. Harris, Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________
Theresa Schyma, City Clerk
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
June 1, 2021
Agenda Item
3. D. 1. Authorization to Sign Amended PUD Permit – Carousel Automobiles PUD No. 95, Amendment
#4
Prepared By
Myles Campbell, Planner
Summary
At the May 6, 2021 City Council meeting, the Council held a public hearing on the Final PUD Plan for
Carousel Automobiles PUD No. 95, Amendment #4. After the hearing, the Council approved the Final
Plan subject to conditions laid out by staff. The PUD Permit has been prepared for consideration.
Financial Or Budget Considerations
None
Recommended Action
Motion to authorize the Mayor and City Manager to sign the amended PUD Permit for Carousel
Automobiles PUD Permit No. 95, Amendment #4
Supporting Documents
• Underlined/Overstruck PUD Permit – Carousel Automobiles PUD Permit No. 95, Amendment #4
(4pages)
Carousel Automobiles P.U.D. No. 95 – Amendment No. 4
City Council Approval: April 6, 2021
Carousel Automobiles P.U.D. No. 95 – Amendment No. 3
City Council Approval: September 16, 2014
Carousel Automobiles P.U.D. No. 95 – Amendment No. 2
City Council Approval: April 1, 2014
Carousel Automobiles P.U.D. No. 95 – Amendment No. 1
City Council Approval: March 4, 2002
Carousel Automobiles P.U.D. No. 95 – Original PUD
City Council Approval: October 2, 2001
City of Golden Valley, Minnesota
Use Permit
for
Planned Unit Development
Project Name: Carousel Automobiles P.U.D. No. 95 – Amendment No. 4
Location: 9191 and 9393 Wayzata Blvd.
Legal Description: Lot 1, Block 1, Lot 1, Block 2 and Outlot A
Carousel Automobiles P.U.D. No. 95
Applicant: Twin Cities Automotive
Address: 9191, 9393, and 9595 Wayzata Boulevard, Golden Valley, MN
55426
Owner: TCA Real Estate LLC
Address: 15802 Wayzata Blvd, Minnetonka, MN 55391
Zoning District: Commercial
Permitted Uses: Development shall be limited to not more than three buildings for
the automobile service and outside display of vehicles. A storm
water retention pond and storage parking lot for new automobiles
is allowed on the triangular piece of property located south of
Miller Street Wayzata Boulevard.
Carousel Automobiles P.U.D. No. 95 – Amendment No. 4 Page 2
Components:
A. Land Use Component:
1. Land uses permitted within P.U.D. No. 95 shall be as indicated on the approved site
plans prepared by Landform and dated August 31, 2001, which are attached to the
PUD permit by reference.
2. Amendment 3 allows for the construction of a new Porsche of Minneapolis building
in the western parking lot, approximately 24,000 square feet in size, as indicated on
the approved site plans prepared by Baker Associates and dated July 10, 2014,
which are attached to the PUD permit by reference.
3. Amendment 4 allows for the reintroduction of an auto dealership to the former
Porsche building, the expansion of the existing Audi dealership, and a new
accessory building on-site for the storage and maintenance of electric vehicle
batteries, as indicated on the approved site plans prepared by Baker Associates
and dated May 26, 2021, which are attached to the PUD permit by reference.
4. Allowed uses for the three buildings on the site shall be for auto sales and service.
A storm water retention pond and storage parking lot for new automobiles is allowed
on the triangular piece of property located south of Miller Street. Uses other than
specified above shall not be allowed except by amendment of the PUD permit.
B. Construction
1. An as-built survey shall be completed for each structure as soon as the foundation
is substantially in place. If there is an incomplete match between lot lines and unit
walls, the developer shall either relocate the foundation or request City approval of
a PUD amendment to replat the affected lots. No certificates of occupancy will be
issued for a building that fails to align with an underlying lot boundary.
2. Except as otherwise specified in the conditions of Final Plan approval, all phases of
site development shall be subject to the standards, approvals, fees, and other
requirements that would arise in connection with a similar project outside of a PUD.
3. The buildings shall be constructed as per the floor and elevation plans prepared by
Landform and dated August 31, 2001, and the plans prepared by Baker Associates
dated July 10, 2014, and May 26, 2021, which are attached to the PUD permit by
reference.
4. The developer shall comply with all instructions outlined in the recommendations of
Ed Anderson, Deputy Fire Marshall, in the Inspections Department’s General Plan
of Development review memo dated August 1, 2001.
5. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Fire
Department dated August 18, 2014, shall become a part of the approval for
Amendment 3.
Carousel Automobiles P.U.D. No. 95 – Amendment No. 4 Page 3
6. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Engineering
Division dated August 18, 2014, shall become a part of the approval for
Amendment 3.
7. All signs must meet the requirements of the City’s sign ordinance.
8. There shall be no exterior public address system for any uses on the site.
9. The lighting in the main parking lot areas shall conform to the requirements of the
City’s Inspection Department, and shall be deflected away from residential areas.
In the triangular piece of property located south of Miller Street, the height of the
light poles shall be limited to 12 feet in height.
10. The lighting surrounding the new Porsche of Minneapolis building in the western
parking lot on the North Lot of the PUD shall conform to the updated requirements
of the City’s Outdoor Lighting ordinance as shown on the photometric plans
prepared by Baker Davis and Associates dated July 10, 2014 May 26, 2021, which
are attached to the PUD permit by reference.
C. Utilities and Grading
1. Before any grading or utility permits are issued, the developer shall provide the City
with acceptable plans, information, and other submittals as identified in all points of
the “Utilities” and “Grading and Erosion Control” sections of the Engineering
Department’s Final Plan review memos dated August 14, 2001, February 25, 2002,
and August 18, 2014, and attached to the PUD permit by reference.
2. During and after construction, the developer shall comply with all instructions
outlined in the “Utilities” and “Grading and Erosion Control” sections of the
Engineering Department’s Final Plan review memos dated August 14, 2001,
February 25, 2002 and August 18, 2014.
D. Circulation Component:
1. Access drives and parking shall be constructed per the site plan prepared by
Landform dated August 31, 2001, and the plans prepared by Baker Associates
dated July 10, 2014, and May 26, 2021.
E. Services and Facilities
1. The hours of operation shall be from 7 am to 12 pm, Monday through Saturday, for
the service department; and for the sales department from 8 am to 9 pm, Monday
through Thursday and until 6 pm on Friday and Saturday.
It is hereby understood and agreed that this Use Permit is a part of the City Council
approval granted on October 2, 2001, March 4, 2002, and September 16, 2014, and April 6,
2021. Any changes to the P.U.D. Permit for Carousel Automobiles P.U.D. No. 95 shall
require an amendment.
Carousel Automobiles P.U.D. No. 95 – Amendment No. 4 Page 4
TCA Real Estate LLC
Witness: ______________________ By: _____________________________
Title: ___________________________
Date: ___________________________
CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY
Witness: ______________________ By: ____________________________
Shepard M. Harris, Mayor
Date: ____________________________
Witness: _______________________ By: ____________________________
Tim Cruikshank, City Manager
Date: ____________________________
Warning: This permit does not exempt you from all other City Code provisions,
regulations and ordinances.
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
June 1, 2021
Agenda Item
3. D. 2. Authorization to Sign Amended PUD Permit – Carousel Automobiles PUD No. 95, Amendment
#5
Prepared By
Myles Campbell, Planner
Summary
At the May 6, 2021 City Council meeting, the Council reviewed a Minor Amendment for Carousel
Automobiles PUD No. 95, Amendment #5. After the hearing, the Council approved the amendment to
the PUD Plan. The PUD Permit has been prepared for consideration.
Financial Or Budget Considerations
None
Recommended Action
Motion to authorize the Mayor and City Manager to sign the amended PUD Permit for Carousel
Automobiles PUD Permit No. 95, Amendment #5
Supporting Documents
• Underlined/Overstruck PUD Permit – Carousel Automobiles PUD Permit No. 95, Amendment #5
(4pages)
Carousel Automobiles P.U.D. No. 95 – Amendment No. 5
City Council Approval: April 6, 2021
Carousel Automobiles P.U.D. No. 95 – Amendment No. 4
City Council Approval: April 6, 2021
Carousel Automobiles P.U.D. No. 95 – Amendment No. 3
City Council Approval: September 16, 2014
Carousel Automobiles P.U.D. No. 95 – Amendment No. 2
City Council Approval: April 1, 2014
Carousel Automobiles P.U.D. No. 95 – Amendment No. 1
City Council Approval: March 4, 2002
Carousel Automobiles P.U.D. No. 95 – Original PUD
City Council Approval: October 2, 2001
City of Golden Valley, Minnesota
Use Permit
for
Planned Unit Development
Project Name: Carousel Automobiles P.U.D. No. 95 – Amendment No. 5
Location: 9191 and 9393 Wayzata Blvd.
Legal Description: Lot 1, Block 1, Lot 1, Block 2 and Outlot A
Carousel Automobiles P.U.D. No. 95
Applicant: Twin Cities Automotive
Address: 9191, 9393, and 9595 Wayzata Boulevard, Golden Valley, MN
55426
Owner: TCA Real Estate LLC
Address: 15802 Wayzata Blvd, Minnetonka, MN 55391
Zoning District: Commercial
Permitted Uses: Development shall be limited to not more than three buildings for
the automobile service and outside display of vehicles. A storm
water retention pond and storage parking lot for new automobiles
is allowed on the triangular piece of property located south of
Wayzata Boulevard.
Carousel Automobiles P.U.D. No. 95 – Amendment No. 4 Page 2
Components:
A. Land Use Component:
1. Land uses permitted within P.U.D. No. 95 shall be as indicated on the approved site
plans prepared by Landform and dated August 31, 2001, which are attached to the
PUD permit by reference.
2. Amendment 3 allows for the construction of a new Porsche of Minneapolis building
in the western parking lot, approximately 24,000 square feet in size, as indicated on
the approved site plans prepared by Baker Associates and dated July 10, 2014,
which are attached to the PUD permit by reference.
3. Amendment 4 allows for the reintroduction of an auto dealership to the former
Porsche building, the expansion of the existing Audi dealership, and a new
accessory building on-site for the storage and maintenance of electric vehicle
batteries, as indicated on the approved site plans prepared by Baker Associates
and dated May 26, 2021, which are attached to the PUD permit by reference.
4. Allowed uses for the three buildings on the site shall be for auto sales and service.
A storm water retention pond and storage parking lot for new automobiles is allowed
on the triangular piece of property located south of Miller Street. Uses other than
specified above shall not be allowed except by amendment of the PUD permit.
B. Construction
1. An as-built survey shall be completed for each structure as soon as the foundation
is substantially in place. If there is an incomplete match between lot lines and unit
walls, the developer shall either relocate the foundation or request City approval of
a PUD amendment to replat the affected lots. No certificates of occupancy will be
issued for a building that fails to align with an underlying lot boundary.
2. Except as otherwise specified in the conditions of Final Plan approval, all phases of
site development shall be subject to the standards, approvals, fees, and other
requirements that would arise in connection with a similar project outside of a PUD.
3. The buildings shall be constructed as per the floor and elevation plans prepared by
Landform and dated August 31, 2001, and the plans prepared by Baker Associates
dated July 10, 2014, and May 26, 2021, which are attached to the PUD permit by
reference.
4. The developer shall comply with all instructions outlined in the recommendations of
Ed Anderson, Deputy Fire Marshall, in the Inspections Department’s General Plan
of Development review memo dated August 1, 2001.
Carousel Automobiles P.U.D. No. 95 – Amendment No. 4 Page 3
5. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Fire
Department dated August 18, 2014, shall become a part of the approval for
Amendment 3.
6. The recommendations and requirements outlined in the memo from the Engineering
Division dated August 18, 2014, shall become a part of the approval for
Amendment 3.
7. Signage within the PUD is limited to a total area of 700 square feet. Sign area shall
be calculated using the method defined in the City’s sign ordinance. All signs must
otherwise meet the requirements of the City’s sign ordinance.
8. There shall be no exterior public address system for any uses on the site.
9. The lighting in the main parking lot areas shall conform to the requirements of the
City’s Inspection Department, and shall be deflected away from residential areas.
In the triangular piece of property located south of Miller Street, the height of the
light poles shall be limited to 12 feet in height.
10. The lighting on the North Lot of the PUD shall conform to the updated requirements
of the City’s Outdoor Lighting ordinance as shown on the photometric plans
prepared by Davis and Associates dated May 26, 2021, which are attached to the
PUD permit by reference.
C. Utilities and Grading
1. Before any grading or utility permits are issued, the developer shall provide the City
with acceptable plans, information, and other submittals as identified in all points of
the “Utilities” and “Grading and Erosion Control” sections of the Engineering
Department’s Final Plan review memos dated August 14, 2001, February 25, 2002,
and August 18, 2014, and attached to the PUD permit by reference.
2. During and after construction, the developer shall comply with all instructions
outlined in the “Utilities” and “Grading and Erosion Control” sections of the
Engineering Department’s Final Plan review memos dated August 14, 2001,
February 25, 2002 and August 18, 2014.
D. Circulation Component:
1. Access drives and parking shall be constructed per the site plan prepared by
Landform dated August 31, 2001, and the plans prepared by Baker Associates
dated July 10, 2014, and May 26, 2021.
E. Services and Facilities
1. The hours of operation shall be from 7 am to 12 pm, Monday through Saturday, for
the service department; and for the sales department from 8 am to 9 pm, Monday
through Thursday and until 6 pm on Friday and Saturday.
Carousel Automobiles P.U.D. No. 95 – Amendment No. 4 Page 4
It is hereby understood and agreed that this Use Permit is a part of the City Council
approval granted on October 2, 2001, March 4, 2002, September 16, 2014, and April 6, 2021.
Any changes to the P.U.D. Permit for Carousel Automobiles P.U.D. No. 95 shall require
an amendment.
TCA Real Estate LLC
Witness: ______________________ By: _____________________________
Title: ___________________________
Date: ___________________________
CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY
Witness: ______________________ By: ____________________________
Shepard M. Harris, Mayor
Date: ____________________________
Witness: _______________________ By: ____________________________
Tim Cruikshank, City Manager
Date: ____________________________
Warning: This permit does not exempt you from all other City Code provisions,
regulations and ordinances.
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
June 1, 2021
Agenda Item
4. A. Public Hearing - Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System General Permit, Storm Water Pollution
Prevention Program, 2020 Annual Report to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Resolution
No. 21-42
Prepared By
Eric Eckman, Environmental Resources Supervisor
Drew Chirpich, Environmental Specialist
Summary
As authorized by the Clean Water Act of 1972 and its amendments, the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) oversees the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit program
which regulates point and non-point sources of pollution into our nation’s waterways. Point sources
include pipes and ditches and non-point sources include overland precipitation runoff. The Minnesota
Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) manages the permit program for EPA in Minnesota.
Cities like Golden Valley, which operate their own storm sewer systems, are required to obtain a
Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) General Permit from the MPCA. The permit allows
Golden Valley to discharge stormwater into public receiving waters. It also requires that the City
develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program (SWPPP) to reduce the
contamination of stormwater runoff and prohibit illicit discharges.
Golden Valley’s SWPPP addresses the six minimum control measures outlined in the MS4 permit
requirements:
1. Public Education and Outreach
2. Public Involvement and Participation
3. Illicit Discharge, Detection, and Elimination
4. Construction Site Runoff Control
5. Post Construction Runoff Control
6. Pollution Prevention and Good Housekeeping
City Council Regular Meeting Executive Summary
City of Golden Valley
June 1, 2021
2
The holding of an annual public hearing and preparation of an annual report are requirements of the
MS4 permit. The Public Hearing has been advertised for June 1, 2021. The City must create a record of
the public comments received, either written or oral. The public input must be considered and a record
of decision must be added to the annual report to MPCA.
Financial Or Budget Considerations
None
Recommended Action
Motion to adopt Resolution No. 21-42 Issuing a Negative Declaration of Need for Revisions to the
Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program.
Supporting Documents
• Resolution No. 21-42 (1 page)
RESOLUTION NO. 21-42
RESOLUTION ISSUING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF NEED
FOR REVISIONS TO THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the City prepared and submitted to the Minnesota Pollution Control
Agency (MPCA) its permit application for operation of the City’s Municipal Separate Storm
Sewer System (MS4) on March 10, 2003; and
WHEREAS, the City was reissued coverage by MPCA for its current MS4 permit on
April 16, 2021; and
WHEREAS, the permit requires that the City develop and implement a plan for
regulating and improving stormwater discharge, commonly referred to as the Storm Water
Pollution Prevention Program (SWPPP); and
WHEREAS, staff has been working to meet the objectives set forth in the SWPPP
and is required to report to the MPCA on the status of the plan’s implementation on an
annual basis; and
WHEREAS, the City has placed notification of a public hearing in the City’s official
newspaper and has held a public hearing to report on progress made in implementation of
the SWPPP and to take public testimony; and
WHEREAS, comments made during the public hearing will be incorporated into the
City Council record.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City of Golden Valley has determined
that no revisions to the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program are required and staff is
hereby directed to file the annual report with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency.
Adopted by the City Council of Golden Valley, Minnesota on this 1st day of June 2021
_______________________________
Shepard M. Harris, Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________________
Theresa Schyma, City Clerk
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
June 1, 2021
Agenda Item
4. B. Public Hearing – Amendments to the Zoning Map – Rezoning Properties to Achieve Conformance
with the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, Ordinance No. 715
Prepared By
Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager
Summary
Staff is requesting that 24 properties be considered for rezoning in order to come into conformance
with the Future Land Use Map in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan.
The Planning Commission held a public hearing on April 26 and voted to recommend approval for the
rezoning of 23 of these properties along the northern stretches of Douglas Drive (5-1) and Winnetka
Avenue (6-0).
Background
State statute requires that all zoning designations be updated to be consistent with the land uses
identified in the Comprehensive Plan. Most areas have already been rezoned; a few properties remain
to be considered.
Analysis
The 24 properties under consideration represent two areas within the city. They both demonstrate a
desire on the part of the City to intensify stretches of land along County roads by upzoning the
residential densities allowed. The 2040 Comprehensive Plan put forward these land use designations as
part of the approved Future Land Use Map.
No development proposals are pending with the City at any of these locations.
Group 1
This group of 18 primarily single-family residential properties along both sides of the northern
portion of Douglas Drive was guided for Moderate Density use in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. By
rezoning to R-2, duplexes and rowhouses would become options for these properties as they
redevelop. All but one of these properties is currently zoned R-1; a six-unit development occupies a
property zoned R-3. Three lots zoned for single-family use have legally nonconforming duplexes;
two additional lots are vacant and are owned by the City.
City Council Regular Meeting Executive Summary
City of Golden Valley
June 1, 2021
2
Address Current
Zoning
Current Use Proposed Zoning
2120 Douglas Drive North R-3 Six-unit development R-2
2130 Douglas Drive North R-1 Single-family home R-2
2150 Douglas Drive North R-1 Single-family home R-2
2210 Douglas Drive North R-1 Single-family home R-2
2230 Douglas Drive North R-1 Single-family home R-2
2300 Douglas Drive North R-1 Vacant R-2
2310 Douglas Drive North R-1 Single-family home R-2
2400 Douglas Drive North R-1 Single-family home R-2
2410 Douglas Drive North R-1 Single-family home R-2
2415 Douglas Drive North R-1 Vacant R-2
2420 Douglas Drive North R-1 Duplex R-2
2430 Douglas Drive North R-1 Single-family home R-2
2501 Douglas Drive North R-1 Single-family home R-2
2510 Douglas Drive North R-1 Single-family home R-2
2511 Douglas Drive North R-1 Single-family home R-2
2531 Douglas Drive North R-1 Single-family home R-2
2551 Douglas Drive North R-1 Duplex R-2
6325 Medicine Lake Road R-1 Duplex R-2
City Council Regular Meeting Executive Summary
City of Golden Valley
June 1, 2021
3
At its regular meeting on August 10, 2020, the Planning Commission tabled consideration of a rezoning
of the properties along the east side of Douglas Drive in light of pending zoning text amendments
regarding the introduction of rowhouses in the R-2 zoning district.
Given the new zoning language, rowhouses would be allowed on these properties, in addition to
duplexes, should redevelopment occur. This would support the City’s goals of encouraging transit
along arterial corridors and providing new types of housing. The existing single-family homes would
still be considered permitted uses under R-2 zoning, so would not be impacted by this change.
Staff is recommending one deviation from the land use plan adopted as part of the 2040
Comprehensive Plan. The property at 2120 Douglas Drive zoned R-3 currently houses six affordable
units in two separate buildings. Rezoning this property to R-2 would effectively lower the number of
City Council Regular Meeting Executive Summary
City of Golden Valley
June 1, 2021
4
units that could be constructed and might be viewed as encouraging the displacement of affordable
housing. Given how much additional thought has gone into the City’s housing plan since the Future
Land Use map was draft four years ago, it is not inappropriate for the Planning Commission and City
Council to consider this change. Staff supports a denial of the proposed rezoning to R-2 for this
property and recommends allowing it to remain zoned R-3. The would also provide an appropriate
transition between the R-2 zoning district to the north and the Neighborhood Mixed Use zoning district
to the south. The majority of the Planning Commission (5-1) agreed with this approach.
Group 2
The west side of Winnetka Avenue North, between 23rd Avenue North and Medicine Lake Road,
currently contains a vacant lot, four single-family homes, a small office building, and the Golden
Valley Cemetery. The 2040 Comprehensive Plan guided the office building and the adjacent
single-family home for Medium Density use, and the remaining four properties to the south for
Moderate Density use.
Address Current Zoning Current Use Proposed Zoning
2445 Winnetka Ave North Office Office building R-3 R-2
2415 Winnetka Ave North R-1 Single-family home R-3 R-2
2409 Winnetka Ave North R-1 Single-family home R-2
2337 Winnetka Ave North R-1 Single-family home R-2
2325 Winnetka Ave North R-1 Single-family home R-2
PID 3011821110083 R-1 Vacant R-2
City Council Regular Meeting Executive Summary
City of Golden Valley
June 1, 2021
5
At its regular meeting on August 24, 2020, the Planning Commission considering a proposed rezoning
of 2445 and 2415 Winnetka from Office and R-1 to R-3, as guided in the Comp Plan. At that point,
testimony was provided by the owners of those properties in favor of the rezoning and by a handful of
neighbors in opposition.
It was noted that the current office use had been struggling in recent years and the property owner
had previously asked the City to consider a rezoning to Commercial. This request was denied based on
concerns regarding a number of potential uses that would be allowed under this zoning designation.
The Planning Commission felt this property, along with the single-family home to the south that has
the same ownership, had the potential to provide a residential transition between the high density
development to the east and single-family neighborhoods to the west. This was the basis for the
change to Medium Density Residential on the Future Land Use map.
Given the outstanding questions regarding the appropriateness of R-3 zoning in this location, the
Planning Commission tabled a decision to allow time for a conversation around rowhouses in the R-2
zoning district to take place. Concerns voiced by neighbors centered on increased building height,
traffic, and noise.
City Council Regular Meeting Executive Summary
City of Golden Valley
June 1, 2021
6
When the Planning Commission revisited the zoning of these two properties, they voted unanimously
to rezone them to a slightly lower density (R-2) instead, addressing concerns over building height and
potential traffic impacts. Staff supports this change.
The key aspects of the two zoning designations being considered are listed below:
Medium Density Residential (R-3) Zoning District
Permitted Uses • Duplexes
• Townhouses
• Multifamily buildings
• Senior and physical disability housing
Conditional Uses • Retail sales, restaurants, and professional offices on a ground floor with
direct access to the street
Density Range • 12 units per acre or 17 units per acre with a CUP (up to three additional
units per acre available through density bonuses)
• Senior/physical disability housing – 20 units per acre or 25 units per acre
with a CUP (up to five additional units per acre available through density
bonuses)
Height • Four stories or 48 feet
• Five stories or 60 feet for senior/physical disability housing with a CUP
Moderate Density Residential (R-2) Zoning District
Permitted Uses • Single-family homes
• Duplexes
• Rowhouses
Density Range • Up to eight units per acre
Height • 28 feet to the midpoint of the highest pitched roof for single-family
homes and duplexes
• 35 feet maximum for rowhouses
Similar to the points raised above about upzoning R-1 properties to R-2 along arterials, the other four
properties under consideration would have the option to redevelop at a slightly higher density – either
as duplexes or rowhouses.
Financial Or Budget Considerations
None
Summary of Recommendations
Staff recommends approval of an amendment to the Zoning Map to rezone the 17 of the 18 properties
in Group 1 from Single-Family Residential (R-1) to Moderate Density Residential (R-2). Staff does not
recommend rezoning 2120 Douglas Drive North from Medium Density Residential (R-3) to Moderate
Density Residential (R-2).
City Council Regular Meeting Executive Summary
City of Golden Valley
June 1, 2021
7
Staff recommends approval of an amendment to the Zoning Map to rezone all six properties in Group 2
from Single-Family Residential (R-1) and Office to Moderate Density Residential (R-2).
The proposed ordinance in front of the City Council reflects the changes recommended by the Planning
Commission.
Recommended Action
Motion to adopt Ordinance No. 715, Rezoning Certain Properties Along Douglas Drive North and
Winnetka Avenue North in Order to Achieve Alignment with the 2040 Comprehensive Plan.
Supporting Documents
• Memo to the Planning Commission dated April 26, 2021 (7 pages)
• Planning Commission minutes dated April 26, 2021 (12 pages)
• List of Affected Properties (1 page)
• Maps of Affected Properties (2 pages)
• Ordinance No. 715, Rezoning Certain Properties Along Douglas Drive North and Winnetka Avenue
North in Order to Achieve Alignment with the 2040 Comprehensive Plan (1 page)
1
Date: April 26, 2021
To: Golden Valley Planning Commission
From: Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager
Subject: Informal Public Hearing – Rezone Properties to Achieve Conformance with the
2040 Comprehensive Plan
Summary
Staff is requesting that 24 properties be considered for rezoning in order to come into
conformance with the Future Land Use Map in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan.
Background
State statute requires that all zoning designations be updated to be consistent with the land uses
identified in the Comprehensive Plan. A number of properties have already been rezoned, while
others are awaiting further action such as the completion of the City’s Downtown Small Area
Plan. Consideration of the current properties was paused while the Planning Commission and City
Council adjusted the text of the zoning chapter of the City Code to allow rowhouses in the R-2
zoning district. With that change completed, rezoning properties along the northern portions of
Douglas Drive and Winnetka Avenue are now being revisited.
Analysis
The 24 properties under consideration represent two areas within the city. They both
demonstrate a desire on the part of the City to intensify stretches of land along County roads by
upzoning the residential densities allowed. The 2040 Comprehensive Plan put forward these land
use designations as part of the approved Future Land Use Map.
No development proposals are pending with the City at any of these locations.
2
Group 1
This group of 18 primarily single-family residential properties along both sides of the northern
portion of Douglas Drive was guided for Moderate Density use in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan.
By rezoning to R-2, duplexes and rowhouses would become options for these properties as they
redevelop. All but one of these properties is currently zoned R-1; a six-unit development
occupies a property zoned R-3. Three lots zoned for single-family use have legally
nonconforming duplexes; two additional lots are vacant and are owned by the City.
Address Current
Zoning
Current Use Proposed Zoning
2120 Douglas Drive North R-3 Six-unit development R-2
2130 Douglas Drive North R-1 Single-family home R-2
2150 Douglas Drive North R-1 Single-family home R-2
2210 Douglas Drive North R-1 Single-family home R-2
2230 Douglas Drive North R-1 Single-family home R-2
2300 Douglas Drive North R-1 Vacant R-2
2310 Douglas Drive North R-1 Single-family home R-2
2400 Douglas Drive North R-1 Single-family home R-2
2410 Douglas Drive North R-1 Single-family home R-2
2415 Douglas Drive North R-1 Vacant R-2
2420 Douglas Drive North R-1 Duplex R-2
2430 Douglas Drive North R-1 Single-family home R-2
2501 Douglas Drive North R-1 Single-family home R-2
2510 Douglas Drive North R-1 Single-family home R-2
2511 Douglas Drive North R-1 Single-family home R-2
2531 Douglas Drive North R-1 Single-family home R-2
2551 Douglas Drive North R-1 Duplex R-2
6325 Medicine Lake Road R-1 Duplex R-2
3
At its regular meeting on August 10, 2020, the Planning Commission tabled consideration of a
rezoning of the properties along the east side of Douglas Drive in light of pending zoning text
amendments regarding rowhouses in the R-2 zoning district.
Given the new zoning language, rowhouses would be allowed on these properties, in addition to
duplexes, should redevelopment occur. This would support the City’s goals of encouraging transit
along arterial corridors and providing new types of housing. The existing single-family homes
would still be considered permitted uses under R-2 zoning, so would not be impacted by this
change.
4
Staff is recommending one deviation from the land use plan adopted as part of the 2040
Comprehensive Plan. The property at 2120 Douglas Drive zoned R-3 currently houses six
affordable units in two separate buildings. Rezoning this property to R-2 would effectively lower
the number of units that could be constructed and might be viewed as encouraging the
displacement of affordable housing. Given how much additional thought has gone into the City’s
housing plan since the Future Land Use map was draft four years ago, it is not inappropriate for
the Planning Commission and City Council to consider this change. Staff supports a denial of the
proposed rezoning to R-2 and recommends allowing the property to remain zoned R-3. The
would also provide an appropriate transition between the R-2 zoning district to the north and the
Neighborhood Mixed Use zoning district to the south.
Group 2
The west side of Winnetka Avenue North, between 23rd Avenue North and Medicine Lake Road,
currently contains a vacant lot, four single-family homes, a small office building, and the Golden
Valley Cemetery. The 2040 Comprehensive Plan guided the office building and the adjacent
single-family home for Medium Density use, and the remaining four properties to the south for
Moderate Density use.
Address Current Zoning Current Use Proposed Zoning
2445 Winnetka Ave North Office Office building R-3
2415 Winnetka Ave North R-1 Single-family home R-3
2409 Winnetka Ave North R-1 Single-family home R-2
2337 Winnetka Ave North R-1 Single-family home R-2
2325 Winnetka Ave North R-1 Single-family home R-2
PID 3011821110083 R-1 Vacant R-2
5
At its regular meeting on August 24, 2020, the Planning Commission considering a proposed
rezoning of 2445 and 2415 Winnetka from Office and R-1 to R-3, as guided in the Comp Plan. At
that point, testimony was provided by the owners of those properties in favor of the rezoning
and by a handful of neighbors in opposition.
It was noted that the current office use had been struggling in recent years and the property
owner had previously asked the City to consider a rezoning to Commercial. This request was
denied based on concerns regarding a number of potential uses that would be allowed under this
zoning designation. The Planning Commission felt this property, along with the single-family
home to the south that has the same ownership, had the potential to provide a residential
transition between the high density development to the east and single-family neighborhoods to
the west. This was the basis for the change to Medium Density Residential on the Future Land
Use map.
6
Given the outstanding questions regarding the appropriateness of R-3 zoning in this location, the
Planning Commission tabled a decision to allow time for a conversation around rowhouses in the
R-2 zoning district to take place. Concerns voiced by neighbors centered on increased building
height, traffic, and noise (see attached minutes of the August 24 meeting).
The key aspects of the two zoning designations being considered are listed below:
Medium Density Residential (R-3) Zoning District
Permitted Uses • Duplexes
• Townhouses
• Multifamily buildings
• Senior and physical disability housing
Conditional Uses • Retail sales, restaurants, and professional offices on a ground floor with
direct access to the street
Density Range • 12 units per acre or 17 units per acre with a CUP (up to three additional
units per acre available through density bonuses)
• Senior/physical disability housing – 20 units per acre or 25 units per acre
with a CUP (up to five additional units per acre available through density
bonuses)
Height • Four stories or 48 feet
• Five stories or 60 feet for senior/physical disability housing with a CUP
Moderate Density Residential (R-2) Zoning District
Permitted Uses • Single-family homes
• Duplexes
• Rowhouses
Density Range • Up to eight units per acre
Height • 28 feet to the midpoint of the highest pitched roof for single-family
homes and duplexes
• 35 feet maximum for rowhouses
Similar to the points raised above about upzoning R-1 properties to R-2 along arterials, the other
four properties under consideration would have the option to redevelop at a slightly higher
density – either as duplexes or rowhouses.
Should the City chose not to rezone any of these properties, an amendment to the Future Land
Use Map would then be required with the Met Council – modifying the recently-adopted 2040
Comprehensive Plan – in order to maintain consistency between guided land use and zoning.
Recommended Action
Staff recommends approval of an amendment to the Zoning Map to rezone the 17 of the 18
properties in Group 1 from Single-Family Residential (R-1) to Moderate Density Residential (R-2).
7
Staff recommends denial of an amendment to rezone 2120 Douglas Drive North from Medium
Density Residential (R-3) to Moderate Density Residential (R-2).
Staff recommends approval of an amendment to rezone 2445 Winnetka Avenue North from
Office to Medium Density Residential (R-3) and 2415 Winnetka Avenue North from Single-Family
Residential (R-1) to Medium Density Residential (R-3).
Staff recommends approval of an amendment to the Zoning Map to rezone four properties in
Group 2 from Single-Family Residential (R-1) to Moderate Density Residential (R-2).
Attachments
List of Affected Properties (1 page)
Maps of Future Land Use and Existing Zoning Designations (2 pages)
Planning Commission minutes of August 24, 2020 (8 pages)
REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
This meeting was held via Webex in accordance with the local emergency declaration made by
the City under Minn. Stat. § 12.37. In accordance with that declaration, beginning on March 16,
2020, all Planning Commission meetings held during the emergency were conducted
electronically. The City used Webex to conduct this meeting and members of the public were
able to monitor the meetings by watching it on Comcast cable channel 16, by streaming it on
CCXmedia.org, or by dialing in to the public call‐in line.
1. Call to Order
The meeting was called to order at 7:00 by Chair Blum.
Roll Call
Commissioners present: Rich Baker, Ron Blum, Adam Brookins, Andy Johnson, Noah Orloff, Lauren
Pockl, Ryan Sadeghi, Chuck Segelbaum
Staff present: Jason Zimmerman – Planning Manager, Myles Campbell – Planner
Council Liaison present: Gillian Rosenquist
Commissioner Johnson asked when the final items from the 2040 Comprehensive Plan will be
discussed. Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager, responded that it depends on applications and in
about 2‐3 months the last pieces will come together.
2. Approval of Agenda
Chair Blum asked for a motion to approve the agenda.
MOTION made by Commissioner Brookins, seconded by Commissioner Sadeghi, to approve the
agenda of April 12, 2021. Staff called a roll call vote and the motion carried unanimously.
3. Approval of Minutes
Chair Blum asked for a motion to approve the minutes from March 22, 2021.
MOTION made by Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Commissioner Brookins, to approve
minutes. Staff called a roll call vote and the motion carried unanimously.
4. Public Hearing – Continued Consideration of a Major Amendment to Hidden Lakes PUD 74
Applicant: Regency Hospital
Address: 1300 Hidden Lakes Parkway, Golden Valley, MN
Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager, reminded the group that this hearing is a follow‐up from a
previous meeting on January 25th, due to new material. This amendment to PUD 74 would allow for
an expansion of the hospital building and that would lead to necessary utility and landscape changes.
April 12, 2021 – 7 pm
City of Golden Valley Planning Commission Regular Meeting
April 12, 2021 – 7 pm
2
Zimmerman displayed a map and reviewed the zoning district and location within the City of Golden
Valley.
The previous meeting ended with a list of outstanding concerns and since then, there were
negotiations between the hospital and the HOA Board, revisions were made to the plans:
6’ high solid wall along east edge of parking lot
Additional landscaping
Reduction of seven proposed parking spaces (37 vs. 44)
The updated proposal includes a new private agreement between the HOA and the Hospital Board
that addresses eight areas of concern:
Hidden Lakes Parkway – maintenance and cost issues
Employee smoking and littering
Traffic speeds, stop signs, noise, deliveries, etc.
New parking lot landscaping and wall
Lighting
Stormwater management
Construction activities
Future expansion
This private agreement was approved by the HOA Board and hospital, then shared with residents on
April 7th. This agreement is intended to manage issued outside of the PUD permit.
Zimmerman recapped the details of the PUD amendment regarding the size of the addition, utility
details, the existing entrance, dining/day room on the second floor, and the exterior material details.
To illustrate these details, a map was displayed as well as a 3D rendition of the proposal. The updated
plan recap is:
Parking lot reconfiguration triggered:
o Expand to the south, add 37 parking stalls
o Would remain under the usual required parking ratio
o Knoll and existing trees would be removed
New landscaping/screening added along east edge of parking lot – both low and high
Lighting would respond to the City’s “dark skies” requirements
Stormwater treated/managed through an underground system
Using the trip generation data for nursing homes, traffic engineers estimated that the addition would
generate an estimated 42% increase in trips per day (578 to 822).
Zimmerman reviewed the details surrounding community engagement, public comments, and the
schedule for this item appearing before Planning Commission and the scheduled date it will appear
before City Council.
Staff evaluation and preliminary findings were extensive and resulted in a recommendation for
approval subject to 18 conditions.
City of Golden Valley Planning Commission Regular Meeting
April 12, 2021 – 7 pm
3
Recommendation
Approval of Amendment #8 to Hidden Lakes PUD No. 74, subject to the following conditions:
1. The plans for the Regency Hospital addition, submitted January 13, 2021, and subsequently
updated on March 29, shall become a part of this approval. Required revisions include:
a. Showing and labeling the access gate and trail along the south property line.
b. Reducing lighting levels under second‐floor addition and under the port cochère.
c. Working with staff to locate designated smoking area for employees and visitors.
d. Indicating the location of trash receptacles in and around the parking lot.
2. Public bicycle racks or similar facilities for a minimum of 11 bicycles shall be provided. The
applicant shall work with staff to appropriately locate the bicycle facilities.
3. The applicant shall provide a snow storage/removal plan that does not reduce the number
of parking stalls nor impact the public trail for staff review and approval prior to City
approval of the PUD Permit.
4. A public walkway easement shall be dedicated over the public trail in the southeast corner
of the site. This trail shall be temporarily rerouted and maintained for public use during
construction.
5. A permanent conservation easement shall be dedicated along the shoreland of Twin Lake.
6. The applicant shall repair and maintain the fence along the south property line to
discourage cut through foot traffic to Twin Lake.
7. The applicant shall utilize motion sensors on parking lot lighting, and utilize motions sensors
and motorized shades on timers within the day room, in order to reduce unnecessary
illumination and reduce impacts to adjacent properties.
8. The applicant shall install and maintain landscaping adjacent to the public trail on the east
side of the property in accordance with the approved plans on file with the City.
Maintenance shall include all reasonable care, trimming, repairs, and replacement needed
to ensure the landscaping improvements are kept in good condition.
9. With the exception of oxygen deliveries, large truck deliveries and pick‐ups shall be limited
to the hours of 7 am to 8 pm daily.
10. The hospital shall be limited to a total of 92 beds. The building footprint shall not be
expanded without the required review and approval by the City.
11. The applicant shall work with staff to address questions around the outdoor chemical
storage areas near the southwest corner of the building.
12. Plans must be reviewed and approved by the Bassett Creek Watershed Management
Commission.
13. A stormwater maintenance and chloride management agreement with the City shall be
executed.
14. The applicant shall complete all inspections related to the City’s Inflow and Infiltration
requirements and work with staff to resolve any repairs or improvements necessary.
15. An updated agreement between the hospital and association, addressing reimbursement
procedures and commitments for construction‐related damage on Hidden Lakes Parkway
and the reallocation of roadway expenses, shall be provided to the City for review prior to
approval of the PUD Permit.
City of Golden Valley Planning Commission Regular Meeting
April 12, 2021 – 7 pm
4
16. The applicant shall share with the City its plan for management of trash in and around the
parking lot as well as for employee communication around these efforts.
17. The applicant shall address the three conditions outlined by the Minneapolis Park and
Recreation Board in its letter dated December 29, 2020.
18. A development agreement shall be drafted prior to City approval of the PUD Permit and
shall include details on:
a. Permitted days and hours of construction activity.
b. The location and nature of construction parking, access, delivery, staging,
equipment and materials storage, and employee parking.
c. A neighborhood “Hot Line” for issue resolution.
Commissioner Pockl asked how the City insures the private agreements are enforced. Zimmerman
responded that the City stays out of the private agreement between the hospital and the HOA. Any
condition or agreement in the PUD permit has the enforcement of the PUD process. Violations will
be addressed, require corrective actions, and could result in legal action.
With all the conditions and the private agreement, Commissioner Johnson asked if the Planning
Commission has now set itself up as a mediator and straying from its expertise in reviewing parking
etc. He followed up by asking who has precedence, the HOA or the homeowners in the HOA.
Zimmerman responded that staff has not inserted itself in the private agreement but together they
came to the City and asked how it could be enforceable. The HOA will discuss what they intend to do
to enforce their agreement. Johnson followed up that he hopes the Commission stays within its
realm of ability.
Chair Blum invited the Applicant to address the Commission.
Dave Garmin, Applicant ‐ Regency Hospital, stated the private agreement with the HOA was a good
compromise that benefits them and the HOA.
Chair Blum opened the public hearing at 7:40pm.
Jeff Eisenberg, President of HOA, stated staff provided a good presentation and elaborated on a
background between the HOA and the applicant. Discussion between the HOA and Commissioners
included resident input on and responses to the agreement.
Fredda Pink
1405 Waterford Drive
My husband has written quite a bit but my concern is the hospital is planning on doing a piling. I
don’t know how many people are aware of the noise associated with a piling. My son is a real estate
developer and he told us a few days ago that there’s a more expensive style that eliminates the
constant pounding noise and potential damage to our homes. I was wondering if it would be possible
to look into that, it would relieve a lot of tension. There’s also no protection for the people who face
the north end of the hospital, we have a full view of the north end of the building and parking lot.
That hasn’t been addressed either.
City of Golden Valley Planning Commission Regular Meeting
April 12, 2021 – 7 pm
5
Patrick Lewis
1750 Waterford Court
I wanted to clarify a few things from the presentation, there isn’t unanimous HOA Board support for
the agreement and there is a difference between the homeowners and the HOA. I’ll reiterate that
this project will be problematic no matter what, it’s a commercial development in a residential area.
This expansion involves all the mitigations discussed to mask the issue that it’s too big of a build for
this area. The hospital said they don’t have plans to expand but there’s nothing preventing them
from proposing expansions in later years. The main thing I want to state again is that there isn’t an
agreement between homeowners, the HOA Board doesn’t represent the homeowners, and there
isn’t even agreement among the Board.
Ron Schiferl
4220 Woodland Trail
There’s been significant improvement since the last Planning Commission Meeting. The landscaping
plan pictures look great but the actual plan proposed is to limit the trees to 6foot‐that’s exactly as
high as the wall. There needs to be more variation in the plan. I hope the city works with the hospital
to create more variety so it looks like landscaping. Can we add something to ensure the hospital
maintains its landscaping as they have a history of not doing that. The last Planning Commission
meeting there was mention that the hospital reached out to homeowners, they had not before or
after that meeting. All communication has come from the HOA. My understanding is that this plan is
for a two‐story building to allow for expansion on the first floor, if the hospital isn’t planning on any
expansions in the future, why do they still need a two‐story building?
Chair opened Commissioner discussion.
The Chair asked staff to address the pilings question. Zimmerman said his understanding is that
they’re not planning on using pilings but rather do spread footings. He followed up that he’s not sure
how that impacts surrounding properties. A development agreement can address those issues.
Displaying images from the presentation, staff addressed the concerns regarding shielding from the
north end of the building and staff pointed out that most of the homes are on a hill from the hospital
which may create more difficulties. Zimmerman added a condition to the PUD that landscaping must
be maintained and trees will be 6 feet in height to start, not top out at 6 feet.
Chair closed the public hearing at 8:11pm.
Commissioners Johnson asked if the parking spaces exceed minimum amount, why is the City
agreeing to this when they value green space. Staff responded that the minimum amount from the
hospital is their standard amount and they’d prefer more to accommodate staff, training, visitors
etc. Johnson expressed concern on this topic and feels the number of parking spaces is arbitrary.
Commissioner Pockl asked if they can ask the applicant why removal of the knoll is needed.
City of Golden Valley Planning Commission Regular Meeting
April 12, 2021 – 7 pm
6
Alan Catchpool, Applicant Engineer with Kimley‐Horn, stated that public utilities goes through the
site and to the SE corner and the entrance to the parking lot is through the knoll. Those items require
the knoll removal.
Chair Blum noted the dedication of a conservation easement and staff responded that most of twin
lakes has a conservation easement along it and the City would like to continue protecting that area.
This helps prevent erosion and development and the area is not currently developed. Blum asked if
it’s harder to develop on a slope as steep as the one along the hospital to the lake. Zimmerman
responded that it is and was part of the hospital’s original plan but the decided against it. Blum noted
to Commissioners that the area unlikely to be developed and may have less value to be dedicated as
a conservation easement.
Pockl asked the HOA representatives to explain how the HOA Board came to support the private
agreement as a caller noted they hadn’t. Eisenberg, HOA, stated that the Board was updated after
every conversation with the hospital and the Board voted unanimously to support the private
agreement.
Johnson referred to page 10 that the applicant wants to use motion sensors in the parking lot, and
asked if that means the lot will be completely dark. Zimmerman stated the City Code has a minimum
level for how the lot is illuminated.
Blum discussed the building height and setbacks in the proposal. Commissioners had a discussion
revolving around these items, lighting, and the easement. The discussion moved on to property
maintenance, the applicant meeting requirements, and negotiations between applicant, city and
HOA.
Commissioner Segelbaum commended the negotiations and supports staff recommendation.
Commissioner Brookins stated he supports the proposal and staff recommendation. Blum asked for
more mitigating changes. Commissioner Sadeghi asked if the HOA Board mentioned the items
concerning to Blum as they will feel the direct impacts. Eisenberg, HOA, responded that the private
agreement, gives them more rights than they had before. The hospital needs repairs and the
proposal will help that. Pockl said she’s not concerned about the setbacks or height, negotiations
have been productive and the hospital improvements will have a positive impact. Pockl stated
support for staff recommendations. Commissioner Johnson said he tried to consider all parties
involved and doesn’t think an HOA Board has more say than the average resident. He added the
process may need to change in the forward to ensure consideration of everyone’s rights.
MOTION made by Commissioner Brookins, seconded by Commissioner Segelbaum to formally
adopt staff findings and follow staff recommendation for approval subject to the 18 conditions as
listed in the memo.
Chair Blum stated he felt the final approval could be stricter.
2d: Blum suggested the language change to “install and maintain”
16: Blum suggested instead of the plan being shared, that there be more certain language.
Staff took a roll call vote on the motion and it passed unanimously.
City of Golden Valley Planning Commission Regular Meeting
April 12, 2021 – 7 pm
7
5. Public Hearing – Amendments to Future Land Use and Zoning Maps
Applicant: Golden Valley Country Club
Address: Northwest corner of 7001 Golden Valley Road
Prior to presentation, Commissioner Sadaghei recused himself as there was a conflict of interest.
Myles Campbell, Planner, summarized that the applicant is petitioning the City for both a Zoning Map
Amendment and a change to the City’s Future Land Use Plan for a portion of the Golden Valley Country
Club Property. Property is currently zoned I‐4 for Institutional use and the requests would result in the
property being zoned “R‐1, Single Family Residential. Reguiding and Rezoning the property is the first
step to allowing the site to be redeveloped for single‐family housing.
Country Club approached the City in late 2019 about the opportunity to sell a portion of their property
to a private developer. 7001 Golden Valley Road is in total 148.76 acres, the area being considered for
rezoning is 2.25 acres.
Ron Clark Construction (developer) is proposing to use the site for the development of seven single
family homes. The applicant would like to use a new private road to provide access to the homes,
limiting the number of new curb cuts off the public streets, and allowing for additional greenspace
buffers. A PUD would be necessary and the City would require some public benefits and amenities in
order to allow for flexibilities such as the private road. None of these actions can occur without change
to the site’s zoning and guided land use
Campbell discussed the existing conditions of the area, topography, creek location, and showed maps
to illustrate these items.
The approvals process prior to any redevelopment is large, if the rezoning and reguiding are approved,
the applicant must then either apply for a major subdivision or a PUD. A potential approval schedule
was displayed assuming each step was approved without tabling or additional review.
Staff analyzed surrounding uses, traffic generation, buildable lots, and the comprehensive plan.
Staff Findings
The site is currently in an area with other R‐1 zoned properties, and would not be out of
character with the surrounding neighborhood.
More work is needed to determine the safest street access to the new residential
development, but Engineering staff is not concerned about the traffic generated by the
inclusion of new single‐family residential in the area.
The use of this site for a residential purpose fits with a number of the goals and objectives of
the Comprehensive Plan.
In its Housing Chapter, the Comprehensive Plan recognizes the need for new housing in the
City to maintain pace with demand, but notes the lack of available land area for a relatively
City of Golden Valley Planning Commission Regular Meeting
April 12, 2021 – 7 pm
8
built‐out city. Rezoning this land and allowing for development would be a path to providing
some new housing in the city.
While the focus of rezoning should be on all potential future users under the R‐1 zoning
designation, the narrative provided by Ron Clark Construction demonstrates both a high
quality end product and an understanding that they are entering an existing neighborhood
and an area with critical natural resources to protect.
Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of the requested amendment to the Zoning Map, changing the zoning
designation for the proposed parcel as described in the land survey from Institutional Sub‐district I‐4,
to Single Family Residential R‐1.
Staff recommends approval of the requested amendment to the Future Land Use Map, changing the
guided land use for the proposed parcel as described in the land survey from Parks & Natural Areas to
Low Density Residential.
The discussion started with process explanations and, PUD process, community engagement, and
other input from watershed organizations and Met. Council. Chair Blum commented that it seems
PUDs tend to maximize number of lots which causes concern for him on the size of lots proposed in
this area. Campbell explained that a PUD can allow for more design flexibility, helps the City maintain
wooded areas and greenspace. The City also changed the PUD requirements and new standards are in
place to identify public amenities to be included in a PUD which allows the developer design flexibility.
Campbell added he doesn’t feel a PUD only serves the developer.
Commissioner Pockl asked if consideration for mature vegetation could be added to PUD
requirements. Campbell responded that tree and landscape requirements would be required
regardless of how the lots are established. The conversation moved on to discuss requirements for
vegetation prior to these other approvals, hoping the property owner doesn’t clear cut prior to the
landscaping considerations being in place.
Commissioner Johnson expressed concern that the group is picking at the comp plan and how
affordable and variety of housing is being factored into this plan. Campbell stated that the purchase
agreement for the property may preclude affordable housing policies. However, the mixed‐income
property policy requires new developments over a certain scale, make a percentage of the units
available at a lower income value. In this case, the 7 units, do not meet the requirement for the policy.
There are items in other chapters of the comp plan that can be addressed later in the proposal, at this
point there are not enough details to say if these goals will be met.
Blum stated that the Comp. Plan can be used to argue against the proposal as well and cited the open
green space item.
Pockl asked if the topography of the site limits development. Campbell responded that Engineering
staff didn’t have an initial reaction when reviewing the proposal but details surrounding those specifics
will be reviewed and discussed when this process is further along. Watershed and state agencies will
be included in those conversations.
City of Golden Valley Planning Commission Regular Meeting
April 12, 2021 – 7 pm
9
Chair Blum invited the applicant to speak.
Ron Clark Construction, Applicant, has been working with the club for 6‐8 months and they feel
strongly that re‐zoning that area to be R‐1 makes sense. The Club has been focused on making sure
this benefits the City and the golf course and has had a holistic approach to this process. The design
isn’t cookie cutter and the creation of a private road helps appeal from the course and helps the buffer
to the road side.
Chair Blum opened the public hearing at 10:04pm.
Eric Boe
1023 Quebec Ave N
I have lived here since 1993 and I’d like to add that all the homes in the area surrounding it are single‐
family detached homes. I think that’s an important detail. It’s good to hear in the plan they’d like to
use a private road. One thing not mentioned, the four‐way intersection at Pennsylvania and Plymouth
is offset. That creates limited visibility and any additional traffic and parked cars will add to safety
concerns. I don’t want to see parking on this intersection or short driveways like over by Menards, I’d
like to see a sidewalk added to the plan for added safety.
Brent Behn
1300 Kelly Drive
My concerns are regarding the term “low‐density” as it seems 7 large homes will be on a 2‐acre site
and that appears to be fairly dense. This density level doesn’t fit in the community surrounding as the
surrounding lots are bigger. I’m concerned with the rezoning continuing and more land being used for
development in the golf course.
Eric Brandt
7400 Plymouth Ave N
We have a lot of parks in Golden Valley but I can’t think of another, separate 2.2‐acre wooded lot. I
think we’re giving up a unique lot. Living here and looking at the wild‐life, they will all be impacted by
clearing the trees. The private road sounds appealing but I can’t think of a single private road in Golden
Valley that compares. Also, 7 homes on 2.2 acres is dense for this neighborhood and the proposed lot
development would be an outlier.
(Name inaudible)
1205 Pennsylvania Ave
I’m also speaking on behalf of my neighbors. I’ve been privy to the plans and I want to indicate that
I’m speaking a little out of context as I’m aware of the plans shared with golf course members. The
private road is set to be on Pennsylvania Ave, the intersection is offset and congested. Our neighbors
moved from an area near construction because it was impacting their quality of life and found this
neighborhood mature and enjoyed the forest area across the street. The lot with trees is a gem as the
previous caller mentioned. The cost associated with the development, the homes will not be on the
City of Golden Valley Planning Commission Regular Meeting
April 12, 2021 – 7 pm
10
affordable side and while it may up our property values, it doesn’t seem that it would further Golden
Valley’s objective to increase middle‐income housing.
Chris Lowman
7440 Plymouth Ave
We bought this house due to its location, we look right at the wooded lot. We are afraid the community
that surrounds us will be taken away with this project. Additional traffic on this already busy corner
makes us worried about the decrease in safety. We’re concerned about the lot sizes not matching the
aesthetic of the neighborhood as well. The target market doesn’t seem to align with the market that
wants to live in this neighborhood. My hope is that whatever decision is made, is the best one for the
neighborhood and the city, not the developer.
Commissioner Orloff stated that he feels more information on the ecological impacts will be needed.
Campbell responded that any development will require removal of many trees and details around that
will be navigated if this becomes a PUD.
Commissioner Segelbaum thanked the callers and noted that many items will be addressed as the
project moves forward. However, it seems that City Engineering staff do not think the addition of 7
homes will create unmanageable traffic. At this early stage, is parking or the offset intersection
considered. Campbell responded that traffic volume is a principal concern, the other concerns will be
addressed later as discussions around the private roadway occur.
Brian Gieseke
1337 Kelly Drive
I’d like to echo what I’ve already heard about the intersection, setbacks, the watershed, and traffic.
The road is already narrow and there isn’t a stop sign for a few blocks so vehicle speeds increase.
Parking will be an issue, especially over the winter and I’m concerned for further lot splitting if this
area is zoned residential. The wooded area is special for our neighborhood and I am concerned for it
to disappear.
Blum urged everyone to utilize flexibility at this early stage and consider what’s most appropriate for
the City and neighborhood here while being fair to the applicant. He referenced the 2040
Comprehensive Plan’s guide for open and green spaces. Blum stated he doesn’t support the applicant’s
request. Pockl echoed those comments and said an appeal of Golden Valley are the green spaces and
natural spaces. Pockl stated she doesn’t feel comfortable changing the zoning and land use at this
point.
Lynne Jensen
1039 Pennsylvania
I’ve lived here 30 years and see a lot of wildlife coming from that area, eagles and owls nest in the trees
proposed to be removed. The road to Winnetka on Plymouth is blocked and a lot of traffic is pushed
to Pennsylvania. Traffic is already a problem on this street and particularly during rush hour. Additional
traffic will also dissuade the active cycling community.
City of Golden Valley Planning Commission Regular Meeting
April 12, 2021 – 7 pm
11
Commissioner Johnson echoed Blum and Pockl’s and doesn’t see the benefit of taking the vibrant
wooden greenspace and turning it in to 7 homes. Johnson is not in favor of changing the designation.
Segelbaum followed up by saying the group is looking at seeing if the area is appropriate to convert
from unused golf course space to housing. Caller concerns can be mitigated later in the negotiation
process, it seems like there may already be a traffic issue. The PUD process will present an opportunity
to help the existing areas. Johnson responded that the group has a responsibility to maintain
greenspace. This plan drastically alters the landscape and he feels there will be more harm than good
as a result. Blum responded that if they start the process now, momentum may take over and the
project won’t turn out in the way the Commission intends on. Flexibility may occur now but things may
not always turn out the way we want with that flexibility. Greenspace is valuable and so are lot sizes,
once they’re given up, they’re gone. The group needs to do what it can to preserve those things.
Chair Blum closed the public hearing at 10:45.
Commissioner Brookins stated support for staff recommendation, feeling it’s appropriate for the area.
MOTION made by Commissioner Pockl and seconded by Commissioner Johnson to deny the zoning
designation amendment for the Northwest corner of 7001 Golden Valley Road.
Staff took a roll call vote:
Aye: Johnson, Pockl, Blum
Nay: Brookins, Segelbaum
Motion carries as stated.
MOTION made by Commissioner Pockl and seconded by Commissioner Johnson to deny the land‐use
amendment for the future land‐use map for the Northwest corner of 7001 Golden Valley Road.
Staff took a roll call vote:
Aye: Johnson, Pockl, Blum
Nay: Brookins, Segelbaum
Motion carries as stated.
Televised portion of the meeting concluded at 10:53 pm
6. Council Liaison Report
Council Member Rosenquist provided a brief update on recent Council actions and upcoming
events. The City and the Minneapolis Park Board are close to finalizing a Memorandum of
Understanding regarding public safety/enforcement in Theodore Wirth Park. Three Rivers Park
district is involved regarding trails and bike infrastructure. A late April “call in” session will be
provided for the Police Task Force to receive input from the public. A bill to study Highway 55 Bus
Rapid Transit continues to move through the legislature.
7. Reports on Board of Zoning Appeals and other Meetings
None.
City of Golden Valley Planning Commission Regular Meeting
April 12, 2021 – 7 pm
12
8. Other Business
None.
9. Adjournment
MOTION by Commissioner Pockl to adjourn, seconded by Commissioner Brookins, and approved
unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 11:02 pm.
________________________________
Adam Brookins, Secretary
________________________________
Amie Kolesar, Planning Assistant
List of Affected Properties
Address Current Zoning Proposed Zoning
2130 Douglas Drive North R-1 R-2
2150 Douglas Drive North R-1 R-2
2210 Douglas Drive North R-1 R-2
2230 Douglas Drive North R-1 R-2
2300 Douglas Drive North R-1 R-2
2310 Douglas Drive North R-1 R-2
2400 Douglas Drive North R-1 R-2
2410 Douglas Drive North R-1 R-2
2415 Douglas Drive North R-1 R-2
2420 Douglas Drive North R-1 R-2
2430 Douglas Drive North R-1 R-2
2501 Douglas Drive North R-1 R-2
2510 Douglas Drive North R-1 R-2
2511 Douglas Drive North R-1 R-2
2531 Douglas Drive North R-1 R-2
2551 Douglas Drive North R-1 R-2
6325 Medicine Lake Road R-1 R-2
2445 Winnetka Ave North Office R-2
2415 Winnetka Ave North R-1 R-2
2409 Winnetka Ave North R-1 R-2
2337 Winnetka Ave North R-1 R-2
2325 Winnetka Ave North R-1 R-2
PID 3011821110083 R-1 R-2
Group 1
Current Zoning Future Land Use Map
Group 2
Current Zoning Future Land Use
ORDINANCE NO. 715
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE CHAPTER 113
Rezoning Certain Properties Along Douglas Drive North and Winnetka Avenue North
in Order to Achieve Alignment with the 2040 Comprehensive Plan
The City Council for the City of Golden Valley hereby ordains:
Section 1. City Code chapter 113 entitled “Zoning” is amended in Section 113-55
Subd. (b) by changing the zoning designation of certain tracts of land as follows:
2130 Douglas Drive North from R-1 to R-2
2150 Douglas Drive North from R-1 to R-2
2210 Douglas Drive North from R-1 to R-2
2230 Douglas Drive North from R-1 to R-2
2300 Douglas Drive North from R-1 to R-2
2310 Douglas Drive North from R-1 to R-2
2400 Douglas Drive North from R-1 to R-2
2410 Douglas Drive North from R-1 to R-2
2415 Douglas Drive North from R-1 to R-2
2420 Douglas Drive North from R-1 to R-2
2430 Douglas Drive North from R-1 to R-2
2501 Douglas Drive North from R-1 to R-2
2510 Douglas Drive North from R-1 to R-2
2511 Douglas Drive North from R-1 to R-2
2531 Douglas Drive North from R-1 to R-2
2551 Douglas Drive North from R-1 to R-2
6325 Medicine Lake Road from R-1 to R-2
2445 Winnetka Ave North from Office to R-2
2415 Winnetka Ave North from R-1 to R-2
2409 Winnetka Ave North from R-1 to R-2
2337 Winnetka Ave North from R-1 to R-2
2325 Winnetka Ave North from R-1 to R-2
PID 3011821110083 from R-1 to R-2
Section 2. City Code Chapter 1 entitled “General Provisions” and Sec. 1-8
entitled “General Penalty; Continuing Violations” are hereby adopted in their entirety, by
reference, as though repeated verbatim herein.
Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect form and after its passage and
publication as required by law.
Adopted by the City Council this 1st day of June, 2021.
Shepard M. Harris, Mayor
ATTEST:
Theresa Schyma, City Clerk
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
June 1, 2021
Agenda Item
4. C. Public Hearing – Amendments to the Future Land Use and Zoning Maps – Reguiding and Rezoning
Properties at the General Mills James Ford Bell Research Center to Achieve Conformance with the
2040 Comprehensive Plan, Ordinance No. 716 and Resolution No. 21-43
Prepared By
Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager
Summary
In order to bring the Future Land Use Map from the 2040 Comprehensive Plan and the City’s Zoning
Map into alignment, staff is proposing to reguide one of three parcels that make up the General Mills
James Ford Bell Research Center and rezone two others. An update to the existing PUD Permit will also
be presented to the City Council separately as a Minor Amendment to further clarify the permitted
uses at this location.
The Planning Commission held a public hearing on May 10 and voted to recommend approval of both
the proposed land use change (4-0-1) and the rezonings (4-0-1).
State statute requires that all zoning designations be updated to be consistent with the land uses
identified in the Comprehensive Plan. Most areas have already been rezoned; a few properties remain
to be considered.
Background
(For a more complete history of this area see the attached document provided by General Mills.)
General Mills owns over 100 acres of land at their James Ford Bell Research Center north of Plymouth
Avenue in the western portion of the city. This land was purchased in 1956 and a research facility was
constructed on the southern portion in the site. In December of 1960, the laboratory opened with 75
employees working on the development of new foods and the diversification and improvement of
existing products.
Over the years, additions to the research center were carried out until it reached the size it is today,
with over 1,000 employees working at the location.
In 1976, General Mills and the City of Golden Valley reached an agreement to create the General Mills
Research Nature Area on the northern half of the site. A trail easement allows residents to use the
City Council Regular Meeting Executive Summary
City of Golden Valley
June 1, 2021
2
City-constructed and maintained trail system. While this area remains private property owned by
General Mills, it is identified in the City’s Natural Resources Management Plan as a potential target for
future acquisition and incorporation in the City’s open space system.
PUD 83 was created in 1999 to allow for an expansion of the main building on a site with multiple
principal structures. The original PUD Permit noted that the north half of the site would be limited to
Light Industrial uses. Over time, two minor amendments and two administrative amendments have
been approved, allowing for additional expansions or modifications to the property.
For decades, the entire site has been zoned Industrial while the City’s Comprehensive Plan has guided
the land use across all three parcels for Light Industrial use. With the adoption of the 2040
Comprehensive Plan, staff set out to achieve consistency between the land use and the zoning.
Initially, staff recommended that all three parcels be rezoned to Light Industrial to match the guided
land use. However, General Mills pointed out that some uses within the research facility could be
considered industrial uses. Therefore, in order to avoid any complications associated with
nonconformities, the City and General Mills have agreed to guide and zone the southern parcel
Industrial while guiding and zoning the northern two parcels Light Industrial.
Analysis
The changes recommended to the Future Land Use Map and the Zoning Map represent an
administrative effort to align the two. No development has been discussed or is currently being
proposed on any part of the JFB property – either at the research facility or within the nature area. In
fact, the PUD that is in place will continue to regulate any current or proposed use and a PUD
amendment would be required before any new development could take place.
Address Current Use Current Land Use Proposed Land Use
9000 Plymouth Ave N Research laboratory Light Industrial Industrial
Address Current Use Current Zoning Proposed Zoning
9145 Earl Street Open space/nature area Industrial Light Industrial
PID 3011821240063 Open space/ponding Industrial Light Industrial
City Council Regular Meeting Executive Summary
City of Golden Valley
June 1, 2021
3
9000 Plymouth Ave N
9145 Earl Street
PID 3011821240063
City Council Regular Meeting Executive Summary
City of Golden Valley
June 1, 2021
4
As part of the clarification of what uses are allowed, the City Council will also be asked to separately
consider an updated PUD Permit that contains the following language:
Financial Or Budget Considerations
None
Recommended Actions
Motion to adopt Resolution No. 21-43, Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan’s Future Land Use Map
Designating 9000 Plymouth Avenue North as Industrial.
Motion to adopt Ordinance No. 716, Rezoning Properties North of the General Mills Research Center in
Order to Achieve Alignment with the 2040 Comprehensive Plan.
Supporting Documents
• Memo to the Planning Commission dated May 10, 2021 (4 pages)
• Planning Commission minutes dated May 10, 2021 (4 pages)
• List of Affected Properties (1 page)
• Maps of Existing and Proposed Future Land Use and Zoning Designations (2 pages)
• Resolution No. 21-43, Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan’s Future Land Use Map Designating
9000 Plymouth Avenue North as Industrial (1 page)
• Ordinance No. 716, Rezoning Properties North of the General Mills Research Center in Order to
Achieve Alignment with the 2040 Comprehensive Plan (1 page)
• History of the James Ford Bell Technical Center (7 pages)
Permitted Uses: Office, research and development uses (including ancillary uses and
amenities), product manufacturing and assembly, packaging, and pilot plant operations.
Components:
A. Land Use
1. Permitted uses for the south lot shall include offices, research and development
laboratories (including associated ancillary uses and amenities), pilot plant
operations, and other general manufacturing uses associated with research and
development (including limited assembly and treatment of food articles and
packaging materials, food processing, and product packaging). Future
development of the north lot shall be limited to those uses permitted in the Light
Industrial zoning district.
1
Date: May 10, 2021
To: Golden Valley Planning Commission
From: Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager
Subject: Informal Public Hearings – Reguiding and Rezoning Properties at the General Mills
James Ford Bell Research Center to Achieve Conformance with the 2040
Comprehensive Plan
Summary
In order to bring the Future Land Use Map from the 2040 Comprehensive Plan and the City’s
Zoning Map into alignment, staff is proposing to reguide one of three parcels that make up the
General Mills James Ford Bell Research Center and rezone two others. An update to the existing
PUD Permit will also be presented to the City Council as a Minor Amendment to further clarify
the permitted uses at this location.
State statute requires that all zoning designations be consistent with the land uses identified in
the Comprehensive Plan. A number of properties have already been rezoned, while others are
awaiting further action such as the completion of the City’s Downtown Small Area Plan.
Background
General Mills owns over 100 acres of land at their James Ford Bell Research Center north of
Plymouth Avenue in the western portion of the city. This land was purchased in 1956 and a
research facility was constructed on the southern portion in the site. In December of 1960, the
laboratory opened with 75 employees working on the development of new foods and the
diversification and improvement of existing products.
Over the years, additions to the research center were carried out until it reached the size it is
today, with over 1,000 employees working at the location.
In 1976, General Mills and the City of Golden Valley reached an agreement to create the General
Mills Research Nature Area on the northern half of the site. A trail easement allows residents to
use the City-constructed and maintained trail system. While this area remains private property
owned by General Mills, it is identified in the City’s Natural Resources Management Plan as a
potential target for future acquisition and incorporation in the City’s open space system.
2
PUD 83 was created in 1999 to allow for an expansion of the main building on a site with multiple
principal structures. The original PUD Permit noted that the north half of the site would be
limited to Light Industrial uses. Over time, two minor amendments and two administrative
amendments have been approved, allowing for additional expansions or modifications to the
property.
For decades, the entire site has been zoned Industrial while the City’s Comprehensive Plan has
guided the land use across all three parcels for Light Industrial use. With the adoption of the 2040
Comprehensive Plan, staff set out to achieve consistency between the land use and the zoning.
Initially, staff recommended that all three parcels be rezoned to Light Industrial to match the
guided land use. However, General Mills pointed out that some uses within the research facility
could be considered industrial uses. Therefore, in order to avoid any complica tions associated
with nonconformities, the City and General Mills have agreed to guide and zone the southern
parcel Industrial while guiding and zoning the northern two parcels Light Industrial.
Analysis
The changes recommended to the Future Land Use Map and the Zoning Map represent an
administrative effort to align the two. No development has been discussed or is currently being
proposed on any part of the JFB property – either at the research facility or within the nature
area. In fact, the PUD that is in place will continue to regulate any current or proposed use and a
PUD amendment would be required before any new development could take place.
Address Current Use Current Land Use Proposed Land Use
9000 Plymouth Ave N Research laboratory Light Industrial Industrial
Address Current Use Current Zoning Proposed Zoning
9145 Earl Street Open space/nature area Industrial Light Industrial
PID 3011821240063 Open space/ponding Industrial Light Industrial
3
9000 Plymouth Ave N
9145 Earl Street
PID 3011821240063
4
As part of the clarification of what uses are allowed, the City Council will also be asked to
consider an updated PUD Permit that contains the following language:
Recommended Action
Staff recommends approval of an amendment to the Future Land Use Map to change the guided
land use for 9000 Plymouth Avenue North from Light Industrial to Industrial.
Staff recommends approval of an amendment to the Zoning Map to rezone 9145 Earl Street and
PID 3011821240063 from Industrial to Light Industrial.
Attachments
List of Affected Properties (1 page)
Maps of Existing and Proposed Future Land Use and Zoning Designations (2 pages)
Draft language for updated PUD Permit (2 pages)
Permitted Uses: Office, research and development uses (including ancillary uses and
amenities), product manufacturing and assembly, packaging, and pilot plant operations.
Components:
A. Land Use
1. Permitted uses for the south lot shall include offices, research and development
laboratories (including associated ancillary uses and amenities), pilot plant
operations, and other general manufacturing uses associated with research and
development (including limited assembly and treatment of food articles and
packaging materials, food processing, and product packaging). Future
development of the north lot shall be limited to those uses permitted in the Light
Industrial zoning district.
REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
This meeting was held via Webex in accordance with the local emergency declaration made by
the City under Minn. Stat. § 12.37. In accordance with that declaration, beginning on March 16,
2020, all Planning Commission meetings held during the emergency were conducted
electronically. The City used Webex to conduct this meeting and members of the public were
able to monitor the meetings by watching it on Comcast cable channel 16, by streaming it on
CCXmedia.org, or by dialing in to the public call‐in line.
1. Call to Order
The meeting was called to order at 7:06 by Vice‐Chair Pockl.
Roll Call
Commissioners present: Ron Blum, Adam Brookins, Andy Johnson, Noah Orloff, Lauren Pockl, Chuck
Segelbaum
Commissioners absent: Rich Baker, Ryan Sadeghi
Staff present: Jason Zimmerman – Planning Manager, Myles Campbell – Planner
Council Liaison absent: Gillian Rosenquist
2. Approval of Agenda
Vice‐Chair Pockl asked for a motion to approve the agenda.
MOTION made by Commissioner Segelbaum, seconded by Commissioner Johnson, to approve the
agenda of May 10, 2021. Staff called a roll call vote and the motion carried unanimously.
3. Approval of Minutes
Vice‐Chair Pockl asked for a motion to approve the minutes from April 26, 2021.
MOTION made by Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Commissioner Brookins, to approve
minutes. Staff called a roll call vote and the motion carried unanimously.
4. Public Hearing – Reguiding and Rezoning Properties at the General Mills James Ford Bell Research
Center to Achieve Conformance with the 2040 Comprehensive Plan
Applicant: City of Golden Valley
Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager, reviewed the series of conversations around rezoning so as
to create alignment between Future Land Use Map in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan and the City’s
Zoning Map. Today’s request is to reguide one property and rezone two properties at the General
Mills James Ford Bell Research Center. There are NO active development proposals for any properties
currently under discussion.
May 10, 2021 – 7 pm
City of Golden Valley Planning Commission Regular Meeting
May 10, 2021 – 7 pm
2
Staff displayed both the future land use and the current zoning map during the presentation. The
zoning map displayed also showed areas that have already been zoned as part of this alignment.
The General Mills James Ford Bell Research Center is a PUD that consists of three parcels; the
southernmost parcel contains the research center. The two northernmost parcels contain the
General Mills Research Nature Area and an undeveloped parcel with a stormwater pond. Duluth
Street splits through the northern section and there are no plans to improve the ROW aside from
nature area parking.
Zimmerman expanded that the area owned by GM is 100+ acres, purchased in 1956 and the research
center was opened in 1960. There’s an agreement with Golden Valley from 1976 that the public is
allowed to use the nature area north of the research center. The City built and maintains trails but it
is private land. The PUD was created in 1999 and staff went on to discuss details of the PUD.
Zimmerman explained that Met Council requires alignment between land use and zoning and instead
of creating non‐conformities, staff negotiated to reguide south parcel to Industrial and rezone north
parcels to Light Industrial. To further clarify, staff will ask City Council to approve an update to the
PUD permit with additional language around the Land Use.
Recommendation
Following the provisions of State statute (sec. 473.858, subd. 1) and the requirements of the
Metropolitan Council with respect to comprehensive planning, staff recommends:
Amending the Future Land Use Map to change the guided land use for 9000 Plymouth Avenue
North from Light Industrial to Industrial
Rezoning 9145 Earl Street and PID 3011821240063 from Industrial to Light Industrial
Vice‐Chair Pockl opened the discussion.
Commissioner Johnson asked if Met Council had a specific request or was their request about about
following guidelines. Zimmerman clarified that Met Council did not comment on this property
specifically but that staff is following their general directive for alignment between land use and
zoning. Johnson stated Duluth street on the map felt misleading as it doesn’t drive the way it’s
marked on the map. Zimmerman responded that the entire ROW is labeled on the map and what’s
on the map is the ROW owned by the City even though it’s never been paved. If a change were
proposed, it would be a public process through the CIP and it would need to be amended in the PUD.
The question has come up but there are no plans to make a road through the area.
Commissioner Orloff asked if staff can generalize what it means to have a nature area zoned as light‐
industrial. Zimmerman responded that nothing will change and the current zoning is Industrial and
has been for decades. The zoning is being down‐zoned and the area can continue to be used as green
space. Should General Mills ever choose to amend the PUD and expand, this zoning will be the base
for what’s allowed. As of right now, General Mills has no plans to develop the area in their 10‐20 year
plan.
Vice‐Chair Pockl opened the public hearing at 7:20pm.
City of Golden Valley Planning Commission Regular Meeting
May 10, 2021 – 7 pm
3
Commissioner Johnson asked about the process if General Mills zoned the area as a green space
since that is what it is. The applicant was not present at the meeting so staff speculated perspective
and discussed the potential process for the applicant if they were to rezone as a green space and
then decide to rezone again in the future to light‐industrial.
Kathy Longar
2105 Aquila Ave N
I think a lot of our neighborhood confusion is that people didn’t realize the use for the nature area
could be light‐industrial. There is concern about what may happen with the ROW and pages in the
agenda mark the ROW as “unimproved.” A minor amendment allows up to 3% of open space to be
developed; is it possible for the amendment to clarify that the trail will not become a street as a
result of this amendment.
Since the text is changing to reflect three lots and not two, I wonder if it could be revised before it’s
signed off on. This minor amendment is the third on the General Mills Land and the first two were
approved by City Council. The Mayor signed off on the first two and I wonder why this signature is
for the City Manager and not the Mayor.
Vice‐Chair Pockl asked if staff can clarify points made by the caller. Zimmerman stated that the
Mayor would sign this amendment when it becomes a minor amendment, as has been done in the
past. Staff can consider clarifying the language regarding plans to the ROW but that will be a larger
conversation with different departments. Zimmerman reiterated that there are no plans to put a
street in the ROW but clarifying the process may be helpful. Commissioner Segelbaum stated the
process seems reasonable and hopes the down zoning will help residents feel at ease. He added that
if he lived in the area, he too would want to know what the process would be if the City decided to
build a street in the ROW. Zimmerman added that it feels straightforward to staff however this
process made residents realize this property was neither City owned nor has it been zoned green
space. Staff wanted to make sure this process was thorough and well communicated. The discussion
continued on whether or not to include ROW intention/process in the amendment.
Vice Chair Pockl closed the Public Hearing at 7:34pm.
MOTION made by Commissioner Segelbaum and seconded by Commissioner Brookins recommend
approval to change the land use on 9000 Plymouth Ave N from Light Industrial to Industrial.
Staff took a roll call vote.
Aye: Brookins, Johnson, Pockl, Segelbaum
Nay:
Abstain: Blum
Motion Passes
MOTION made by Commissioner Brookins and seconded by Commissioner Johnson to recommend
approval of an amendment to the zoning map to rezone 9145 Earl Street and PID 3011821240063
City of Golden Valley Planning Commission Regular Meeting
May 10, 2021 – 7 pm
4
from Industrial to Light Industrial and have the City create language documenting potential ROW
improvement processes.
Staff took a roll call vote.
Aye: Brookins, Johnson, Pockl, Segelbaum
Nay:
Abstain: Blum
Motion Passes
Televised portion of the meeting concluded at 7:40 pm
5. Council Liaison Report
Planning Manager Zimmerman provided an update from Council Member Rosenquist: the Council
approved the Hidden Lakes PUD amendment and also the application to rezone the northwest
corner of the GV Country Club; the GV Energy Action Plan was approved by the Council; work on
habitat restoration at Briarwood was approved; the City is applying for a Reducing Harm through
Collaborative Solutions Grant through the Pohlad Foundation; and the Minneapolis Park and
Recreation Board did not approve the draft MOU with Golden Valley, but emergency response
plans will move forward.
6. Reports on Board of Zoning Appeals and other Meetings
Planner Campbell reported that one item from the April BZA meeting will carry over to May. A second
application was also received.
7. Other Business
The Commissioners held elections for new officers. Commissioner Segelbaum nominated
Commissioner Pockl for Chair; Commissioner Johnson seconded. The vote to approve was unanimous.
Segelbaum nominated Commissioner Brookins for Vice‐Chair; Commissioner Blum seconded. The
vote to approve was unanimous. Segelbaum nominated Johnson for Secretary; Pockl seconded. The
vote was unanimous.
8. Adjournment
MOTION by Commissioner Brookins to adjourn, seconded by Commissioner Johnson, and
approved unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 8:16 pm.
________________________________
Andy Johnson, Secretary
________________________________
Amie Kolesar, Planning Assistant
List of Affected Properties
Address Current Land Use Proposed Land Use
9000 Plymouth Avenue North Light Industrial Industrial
Address Current Zoning Proposed Zoning
9145 Earl Street Industrial Light Industrial
PID 3011821240063 Industrial Light Industrial
Current Future Land Use Designations Current Zoning Designations
Proposed Future Land Use Designations Proposed Zoning Designations
RESOLUTION NO. 21-43
RESOLUTION FOR AMENDMENT TO THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN’S FUTURE LAND USE PLAN MAP
DESIGNATING 9000 PLYMOUTH AVENUE NORTH AS INDUSTRIAL
WHEREAS, the City Council has met at the time and place specified in a notice duly
published with respect to the subject matter hereof and has heard all interested persons,
and it appearing in the interest of the public that the Future Land Use Plan Map as
heretofore adopted and enacted by the City of Golden Valley be amended; and
WHEREAS, the area affected is legally described as follows:
Lot 1, Block 1, General Mills PUD No. 83, except that part embraced within Southeast 1/4
of Northwest 1/4 and Northeast 1/4 of Southwest 1/4 of Section 30 Township 118, Range
21, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council for the City of Golden
Valley, that pursuant to the provision of Sec. 113-28 of the City Code for the City of Golden
Valley, and subject to review and approval by the Metropolitan Council for conformity with
regional systems plan as provided in state law, the Future Land Use Plan Map for the City of
Golden Valley is hereby amended by changing the property at 9000 Plymouth Avenue North
to Industrial.
Adopted by the City Council this 1st day of June, 2021.
_____________________________
Shepard M. Harris, Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________________
Theresa Schyma, City Clerk
ORDINANCE NO. 716
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE CHAPTER 113
Rezoning Properties North of the General Mills Research Center
in Order to Achieve Alignment with the 2040 Comprehensive Plan
The City Council for the City of Golden Valley hereby ordains:
Section 1. City Code chapter 113 entitled “Zoning” is amended in Section 113-55
Subd. (b) by changing the zoning designation of certain tracts of land as follows:
9145 Earl Street from Industrial to Light Industrial
PID 3011821240063 from Industrial to Light Industrial
Section 2. City Code Chapter 1 entitled “General Provisions” and Sec. 1-8
entitled “General Penalty; Continuing Violations” are hereby adopted in their entirety, by
reference, as though repeated verbatim herein.
Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect form and after its passage and
publication as required by law.
Adopted by the City Council this 1st day of June, 2021.
Shepard M. Harris, Mayor
ATTEST:
Theresa Schyma, City Clerk
James Ford Bell Technical Center, 60 years in Golden Valley! Home of food research activities for
General Mills.
01- Future site of James Ford Bell Technical Center late 1950s (photo credit Minneapolis Star)
In 1956, a plateau of fallow pastureland was purchased. The partially wooded 112-acre site in Golden
Valley, a suburb west of Minneapolis, overlooked rolling farms and new residential developments. With
the new General Office of General Mills just over a mile away, a plan was in place to accelerate the
research efforts of the company.
The decision to build an entirely new research facility happened after a study of reveled that expanding
the research facilities at 2010 East Hennepin Ave in Minneapolis, MN
[https://blog.generalmills.com/2013/01/new-creations-at-our-old-research-complex/] was no longer
practical.
02- The Research Laboratories at 2010 E Hennepin originally opened in 1930. By the mid-50s,
temporary buildings were needed to accommodate the research efforts of the company (1959).
General Mills was no longer just a flour company and research had created nearly all the products on
the market. In 1948, only 6 packaged foods were on the market, by 1958 there were 60. Additionally,
products which did not exist 10 years prior accounted for a quarter of all sales for the company.
Research focused an intensified effort towards developing new nutritious foods, exploring opportunities
for diversification, and improving products already on the market. The standard of quality of the 1960s
would be a steppingstone for the quality of today.
“To face tomorrow with the thought of using the methods of yesterday is to envision life at a
standstill. To keep ahead, each one of us, no matter what our task, must search for new better
methods – for that which we do well today must be done better tomorrow.” – James Ford Bell,
Founder of General Mills
03-Richard Kieffel (L), Group Leader, Mix Development, and William Manuel measure “weeping”
of a fluffy frosting mix (1971).
It almost by accident that the site in Golden Valley was discovered. Originally, the company had
purchased land 5 miles north of Anoka. However, while the Anoka site did fit all the requirements the
distance from Minneapolis and the other company sites would prove to be a challenge for research
staff.
Arthur D. Hyde, Vice President for Research and Warren B. Wade began searching for a new site. All
available land on the west side of Minneapolis was considered and when they stumbled upon the 105-
acre site in Golden Valley, it became the choice location within 48 hours. Most of the property had been
owned by the Catholic Church as a site for Holy Angels Academy but was sold when the Academy was
built in Richfield, MN. A section of three acres owned by the Greyhound Bus company and an additional
four acres were purchased before construction began. The site was rezoned by the Village of Golden
Valley for a research laboratory and its associated pilot plants.
Moving to a suburban site would provide an ideal working environment compatible with scientific
pursuits. All essential services such as transportation, highways, communications, and public utilities
made Golden Valley the ideal location.
04-Illustration of James Ford Bell Technical Center from Architects Voorhees, Walker, Smith,
Smith & Haines.
The campus-like appearance of the site was designed by a New York architectural firm and supervised by
the General Mills Engineering Department. It had an attractive brick exterior over long-span structural
steel and concrete. To preserve the natural beauty of the wooded site, a cylindrical 200,000-gallon
water reservoir was placed underground. When the first phase of construction was completed, there
were no houses on Flag Avenue and only one of Boone Avenue, and a winding dirt road led to the
Technical Center.
05-The light shading of the illustration shows the first phase of construction completed in 1960.
The construction had a central stem and wings expanding from it. The building was designed to be
completed in three phases and allow for easy expansion beyond, with the construction of additional
wings. When the building was completed more than 500 research personnel worked at the Golden
Valley location in the 360,500 square feet of laboratory space.
06-Most sections of the building were three stories – a basement with two floors above ground.
Some sections of the building were opened from basement to the roof which could accommodate a
complete flour mill (1960).
The interior was planned in standardized modules so laboratories and offices could be easily moved to
accommodate the ever-changing needs of research. “The type of design and engineering… appears to
reach the current limits of flexibility in construction,” declared Arthur D. Hyde, vice president of research
for General Mills “Research changes swiftly.... We want to be able to change the physical properties
overnight if need be.”
07-Testing cake mixes, circa 1960s.
On December 19, 1960, the first group of 75 scientists, technicians, and service people moved from the
Central Research Laboratories in Minneapolis to the James Ford Bell Technical Center. Basic research in
foods and applied milling had a new home in Golden Valley.
James Ford Bell spoke at the Topping Out and Cornerstone Laying Ceremony for the new Research
Center. He convinced our predecessor company, the Washburn-Crosby Company, of the value of
investing in a scientific program in 1898 [https://blog.generalmills.com/2011/09/the-origins-of-
research-at-general-mills/]. This was one of the earliest research efforts of any milling company. He
would later go on to found General Mills, Inc in 1928.
However, he only visited the completed research laboratories one time before he passed away in
February 1961. The Central Research Laboratories of General Mills in Golden Valley was renamed to The
James Ford Bell Research Center of General Mills in tribute.
08-“Here we shall endeavor to fulfill our growing obligations in a new and changing world of
technological progress directed to the welfare and benefit of many.” – James F. Bell, March 10, 1960
The cornerstone included samples of 20 different General Mills products of the time, coins, business
cards and predictions of food developments for the year 2060, such as the possibility of transforming
ocean plant life into something as tasty as a sirloin steak. With only 40 years to go many of the
predictions of the 1960s may not seem as farfetched as they once were.
09-James Ford Bell Technical Center (2012).
James Ford Bell Technical Center Timeline
• 1956 – Land in Golden Valley Purchased.
• 1966 – James Ford Bell Technical Center (JFB) three phase construction finished.
• 1974 – Additional wings added. Medallion Laboratories launched as a consulting and analytical
service which served both internal and external clients. Services included analyzing products to
meet nutritional labeling requirements and ensuring ingredients and products met food safety
specifications.
• 1983 – Second major addition at JFB completed. It added one of the most architecturally
notable features of JFB, a three-story high serpentine glass wall.
• 1984 – Nationally known landscape architect, Bill Rutherford, transformed the JFB grounds to
create a welcoming and more visually stimulating environment. The company’s art curator, Don
McNeil assisted with the project by providing two sculptures from GMI’s collection and one new
acquisition “Rubinstein” which still serves as a welcoming piece near the main entrance to the
facility.
• 1987 – Warehouse and wings were expanded.
• 2000 – The Employee Services wing added which included the visitor entrance and common
spaces for employees to utilize.
• 2014 – The Medallion Wing opened and centralized the Medallion Labs in new State-of-the-art
facilities. The Wing also received LEED Certification (Leadership in Energy and Environmental
Design). At the time more than 200 types of food and product related testing were conducted
by Medallion Labs and 11,000 quality and compliance related tests each month.
Additional Facts
• General Mills, Inc. and Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator company helped build the Golden
Valley Civic Center in 1959.
• The General Mills Research Nature Area
[http://www.goldenvalleymn.gov/parks/gmresearch/index.php] is an area of 57 acres to the
north of the JFB. It contains walkways and trails which wind through the nature area and is open
to the public.
• Anoka Hennepin Technical College awarded JFB a Foundational Champion Award in 2004 for its
community advocacy through donating equipment and first aid supplies, and for validating a
new online training program. The online training program was designed to provided initial
training and as a refresher course for medical first responders to aid accident victims prior to the
arrival of EMTs.
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
June 1, 2021
Agenda Item
6. A. Authorization to Sign Amended PUD Permit – General Mills PUD No. 83, Amendment #5
Prepared By
Jason Zimmerman, Planning Manager
Summary
At the June 1, 2021, City Council meeting, the Council approved land use and zoning changes to the
parcels that make up General Mills PUD No. 83. To help further clarify what uses are allowed, staff has
prepared an updated PUD Permit that provides additional detail and distinguishes between the south
lot (the location of the research center) and the north lots (the nature area and an outlot).
During the discussion of the rezoning with the Planning Commission, a member of the public requested
that language be added to the PUD Permit to outline the public process that would be taken should an
extension of Duluth Street through the site ever be considered. While the Planning Commission agreed
clarification would be helpful, staff does not believe the PUD Permit is proper place to document this.
Similar to any other public infrastructure project, money for such an extension would need to be
dedicated through the Capital Improvement Program (a process that is carried out in the public eye)
and with public open houses and/or assessment hearings which would involve nearby property
owners.
Financial Or Budget Considerations
None
Recommended Action
Motion to authorize the Mayor and City Manager to sign the amended PUD Permit for General Mills
PUD Permit No. 83, Amendment #5
Supporting Documents
• Underlined/Overstruck PUD Permit – General Mills PUD Permit No. 83, Amendment #5 (2 pages)
General Mills P.U.D. No. 83
City Council Approval: September 7, 1999
Minor PUD Amendment #1 City Council Approval: August 2, 2006
Minor PUD Amendment #2 City Council Approval: August 7, 2013
Administrative PUD Amendment #3 City Manager Approval: March 24, 2017
Administrative PUD Amendment #4 City Manager Approval: September 6, 2019
Minor PUD Amendment #5 City Council Approval: June 1, 2021
City of Golden Valley, Minnesota
Use Permit for Amendment #5
for
Planned Unit Development
Project Name: General Mills P.U.D. No. 83, Amendment #5
Location: 9000 Plymouth Avenue North, Golden Valley, Minnesota
Legal Description: General Mills P.U.D. No. 83
Applicant: General Mills, Inc.
Address: 9000 Plymouth Avenue North, Golden Valley, Minnesota
Owner: General Mills, Inc.
Address: 9000 Plymouth Avenue North, Golden Valley, Minnesota
Zoning District: Industrial/Light Industrial
Permitted Uses: Office/Research including other office support areas Office,
research and development uses (including ancillary uses and
amenities), product manufacturing and assembly, packaging, and
pilot plant operations.
Components:
A. Land Use
1. Permitted uses shall include office/research spaces including other office support
areas Amendment #5 clarifies that the permitted uses for the south lot shall
include offices, research and development laboratories (including associated
ancillary uses and amenities), pilot plant operations, and other general
manufacturing uses associated with research and development (including limited
assembly and treatment of food articles and packaging materials, food
processing, and product packaging). Future development of the north lot shall be
limited to those uses permitted in the Light Industrial zoning district.
General Mills P.U.D. No. 83 Page 2
2. Amendment #3 allows for the construction of four small additions to the primary
building on the JFB Campus per the plans prepared by Alliance dated March 10,
2017.
3. Amendment #4 allows for the replacement of an existing exterior loading dock
with a new enclosed loading dock on the JFB Campus per the plans prepared by
Alliiance dated July 17, 2019. The materials used in the construction of the new
loading dock must match the materials of the existing principal building.
4. The uses on the site shall meet all applicable City, State, and Federal standards.
B. Grading and Utilities
1. General Mills shall continue to work in phases to reach campus-wide compliance
with its sanitary sewer system.
2. All signs on the property must meet the requirements of the City’s Sign Code.
It is hereby understood and agreed that this P.U.D. Permit is a part of the City approvals
granted on September 7, 1999; August 2, 2006; August 7, 2013; March 24, 2017;
September 6, 2019; and June 1, 2021.
Any changes to the PUD Permit for General Mills P.U.D. No. 83 shall require an
amendment.
GENERAL MILLS, INC.
Witness: ______________________ By: _____________________________
Title: ___________________________
Date: ___________________________
CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY
Witness: ______________________ By: ____________________________
Shepard M. Harris, Mayor
Date: ____________________________
Witness: ______________________ By: ____________________________
Tim Cruikshank, City Manager
Date: ____________________________
Golden Valley City Council Meeting
June 1, 2021
Agenda Item
6. B. Second Consideration of Ordinance No. 714, Amending City Code Chapter 2 – Replacing the
Human Rights Commission with a Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Commission, Approving By-Laws
and Initial Membership for the Commission, and Approving a Resolution for Summary Publication
of the Ordinance
Prepared By
Kirsten Santelices, Human Resources Director/Human Rights Commission Staff Liaison
Kiarra Zackery, Equity and Inclusion Manager
Summary
The City of Golden Valley has a deep commitment to dismantling systemic racism and all forms of
oppression. The City currently has two bodies who support initiatives in the areas of human rights,
diversity, equity, and inclusion: a standing Human Rights Commission (HRC) and a temporary Rising
TIDES task force. The first consideration for Ordinance No. 714 was held on May 18, 2021. This
ordinance would repeal and replace the HRC with the establishment of a new Diversity, Equity, and
Inclusion Commission (DEIC) that embodies the work of both groups. The proposed ordinance will also
codify the membership, mission, and responsibilities of the newly created commission. The first DEIC
meeting is scheduled for July 2021. All members from Rising TIDES Task Force and HRC were invited to
serve a 3 year term on the new integrated commission.
HRC and Rising TIDES Integration
As the Rising TIDES Task Force approaches the completion of its appointed work (June 2021), City staff
and TIDES members believe it is crucial that the spirit of the Task Force continue. The mission of the
HRC aligns closely with the purpose of the TIDES Task Force. However, there is a distinct difference
between human rights and diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI). DEI is a framework to combat systems
of oppression that create disparate life outcomes based on social identities. These disparities may, but
not always impede a groups’ ability to access to matters associated with human rights – there is
broader application for the framework. Therefore, the City recommends the creation of a new
commission to replace the existing HRC and includes a DEI framework.
New Proposed Commission
Over the past few months a subcommittee of members from both the Rising TIDES Task Force and the
Human Rights Commission have met with City staff to discuss the creation of a new commission to
combine the work of the HRC and the Rising TIDES Task Force. During these meetings, the
City Council Regular Meeting Executive Summary
City of Golden Valley
June 1, 2021
2
subcommittee members and staff identified important details to include in the new commission
structure.
Name: Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Commission (DEIC)
Membership:
The DEIC will have 9 voting members and two youth members. The DEIC seeks to reflect the diversity
of Golden Valley and create inclusive space for those closest to matters of diversity, equity and
inclusion as listed below:
• Individuals who have professional, volunteer, or personal experiences with communities
that have historically experienced or presently experience the stress and trauma of
discrimination, for example, individuals with work or volunteer experience in the field of
diversity, equity and inclusion, or personal involvement in advocacy or activism;
• Individuals who have professional, volunteer, or personal experiences with healing of
marginalized communities; and
• Individuals with personal experience involving discrimination.
At a minimum the DEIC membership shall consist of:
• One member with a connection to multi-family or group housing; and
• One member of a community group that has demonstrated commitment to the values of
racial equity, inclusion, social justice, and human rights.
Overview of Purpose/Mission
The Commission’s mission is to promote and nurture a safe and welcoming community dedicated
to the values of social equity, inclusion, and justice.
The Commission shall advise and make recommendations to the Council in matters relating to
diversity, equity, inclusion, and human rights.
Recommended Actions
Motion to adopt second consideration of Ordinance No. 714, Amending City Code Chapter 2 –
Replacing the Human Rights Commission with a Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Commission.
Motion to adopt Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Commission Bylaws.
Motion to adopt Resolution No. 21-44, Approving Summary Publication of Ordinance No. 714.
Motion to make the following appointments to the Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Commission.
Supporting Documents
• Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Commission Bylaws (6 pages)
• Ordinance No. 714 - Creating a Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Commission (2 pages)
• Resolution No. 21-44 – Approving Summary Publication of Ordinance No. 714 (1 page)
• Appointment Spreadsheet – Initial Membership of DEI Commission (1 page)
BYLAWS – Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Commission 1
BYLAWS
Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Commission (DEIC)
Article I: Purpose, Mission, and Prescribed Duties
The Commission shall be an advisory commission to the City Council.
A. Mission, Vision, Values
The Commission’s mission is to promote and nurture a safe and welcoming community dedicated to the
values of social equity, inclusion, and justice.
The Commission shall advise and make recommendations to the Council in matters relating to diversity,
equity, inclusion, and human rights.
B. Duties
In accordance with its bylaws and annual work plan, and through the collaboration and cooperation of City
staff, the DEI Commission shall:
(1) Analyze the City’s processes, procedures, policies, and ordinances as directed by the City Council on
matters of diversity, equity, inclusion, human rights.
(2) Present the results of programs of research and recommend changes to processes, procedures,
policies, and ordinances to the City Council based on those results.
(3) Regularly review and evaluate the City’s community outreach methods and activities to ensure
messaging reaches diverse populations and provides inclusive participation opportunities.
(4) Annually provide input on the City’s Equity Plan and, as requested by City Manager, their designee,
or City equity staff:
a. Analyze City systems to identify systems of inequality (including systemic racism), and
b. Make recommendations relating to changes in ordinance, policy, or practice to dismantle
those systems.
(5) Communicate the City’s diversity, equity, and inclusion (DE&I) work and facilitate community
engagement and feedback.
(6) Collaborate with organizations to host and promote events that educate the community on issues
of diversity, equity, inclusion, and human rights, and other issues and to promote awareness and
appreciation of diversity.
Article II: Membership, Appointments, Terms, and Officers
A. Membership
Initially, any current member of the existing Human Rights Commission or Rising Tides Task Force who
submits an application, shall be automatically appointed to the Commission. After the initial
appointments, the Commission shall consist of nine regular members, and two youth voting members.
The reduction in membership size shall happen gradually over the first three years as initial appointment
terms expire so that there are 11 members by May 2023. Youth members shall live or attend school within
Golden Valley, the Robbinsdale Area District or Hopkins School District and be enrolled in school grades 9
BYLAWS – Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Commission 2
through 12.
In accordance with the City’s values and Welcome Statement, the Council shall seek to have said
appointments reflect the diverse voices and perspectives in the community, including:
• Individuals who have professional, volunteer, or personal experiences with communities that have
historically experienced or presently experience the stress and trauma of discrimination, for
example, individuals with work or volunteer experience in the field of diversity, equity and
inclusion, or personal involvement in advocacy or activism;
• Individuals who have professional, volunteer, or personal experiences with healing of marginalized
communities; and
• Individuals with personal experience involving discrimination.
At a minimum the DEIC membership shall consist of:
• One member with a connection to multi-family or group housing; and
• One member of a community group that has demonstrated commitment to the values of racial
equity, inclusion, social justice, and human rights.
If the City does not receive qualified applications from one of the above categories, the remaining spots may be
filled with any person who lives, works, attends school, volunteers, or worships in the City of Golden Valley.
B. Appointments and Terms
Appointments are made effective May 1 of each year. The Council shall appoint regular members of the
Commission for three-year staggered terms. Youth members shall be appointed for a one-year term. The
terms of Commission members shall be fixed and determined at the time of appointment by the governing
ordinance. The City Council shall appoint the members of the Commission and to fill vacancies for
unexpired terms. A vacancy shall be deemed to exist if a regular member ceases to meet the residency
requirements or a youth member who ceases to meet the residency, age, or school requirements.
C. Officers
The Commission shall elect officers of Chair and Vice-Chair from the Commission membership by its voting
members at its regular annual meeting, (no later than the second meeting after May 1 in each year). The
Chair and Vice Chair positions rotate, and members may only serve two consecutive years as the Chair or
Vice-Chair. Should the office of Chair or Vice-Chair become vacant, the Commission shall elect a successor
from its membership at the next regular meeting and such election shall be for the unexpired term of said
office. Officers may also delegate the duties of their position to other Commissioners as deemed
appropriate by the Commission.
Chair responsibilities include:
• work with staff liaison to develop meeting agendas • conduct and preside at all meetings in a productive and time-efficient manner
• ensure the Commission conducts its activities within the stated mission and bylaws of the
Commission
• appoint Commissioners to subcommittees
• monitor and ensure the progress of the Commission
• report to the City Council
Vice-Chair responsibilities:
• perform the duties of the Chair in the absence or incapacity of the Chair
• perform all other duties as prescribed by the Commission
BYLAWS – Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Commission 3
Article III: Meetings and Attendance
A. Meetings
All meetings of the Commission shall be conducted in accordance with the Minnesota Open Meeting Law
and City code. This means all business and discussion occurs at a meeting which has been posted and is
open to the public.
The presence of a majority of all regular members currently appointed to the Commission shall constitute
a quorum for the purpose of conducting its business and exercising its powers and for all other purposes.
In the event a quorum is not reached, a smaller number of members may meet to have informal
discussion, however, formal action shall not be taken and must be reserved for such time as when a
quorum of the Commission is reached. A quorum of the members should not discuss Commission business
by email, forms of social media, telephone, or informal meetings. Commission meetings may be cancelled
by the staff liaison if there are no items on the agenda for discussion.
The proceedings of meeting should be conducted using standard parliamentary procedure.
i. Regular Meeting
The regular meeting of the Commission shall be held on the fourth Tuesday of the month at City Hall
at 6:30 pm. The Commission may, by a majority vote, change its regular meeting dates for any reason
provided proper public notice of the changed meeting is provided.
ii. Annual Meeting
The Annual Meeting of the commission shall be a regular meeting, typically the first meeting after May
1 of each year, at which time elections will be held.
iii. Special Meetings
A special meeting of the Commission may be called by the Chair or two commissioners, or by the City
Council, for the purpose of transacting any business designated in the meeting notice. The notice for a
special meeting shall be posted in compliance with the Minnesota State Statutes governing public
meetings. The staff liaison shall notify Commissioners at least three days prior to the meeting of the
date, time, place and purpose of the special meeting. A special meeting must also be posted in
accordance with the requirements of the Minnesota Open Meeting Law.
B. Attendance
Members are expected to attend all meetings, including the annual board and commission joint meeting. If
a member is unable to attend a meeting, they should contact the staff liaison, who will inform the chair. If
a quorum cannot be attained, the meeting will be canceled. Staff liaisons will track attendance at each
meeting. Each April, the City Manager’s office will review attendance records for the preceding calendar
year (April-March) and send a standardized letter of warning to any member that has missed:
• two consecutive or three total meetings for groups that meet once a month; or
• two consecutive or five total meetings for groups that meet twice a month.
Because attendance is so important to the work of the City’s boards and commissions, the City Manager
may ask the member to explain the reasons for their absences. If circumstances prevent the member
from committing to consistently attending future meetings, the member may be asked to step down. The
City Manager will not ask the member to step down if their inability to attend meetings is due to health
reasons. If the member’s attendance does not improve within 3 months after receiving a warning, the
City Manager or their designee shall ask the member to step down. If the member chooses not to step
down, the Council may take action to remove the member.
BYLAWS – Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Commission 4
Article IV: Rules
A. Agenda
The agenda for regular and special meetings of the Commission shall be prepared by the staff liaison.
Items to be placed on the agenda may be proposed by the Chair, a Commission member, the staff liaison
or at the request of the City Council. Residents, businesses, or other interested parties may contact the
staff liaison to request that an item be placed on the agenda for consideration. All agenda topics
presented by the City Council will be placed on an appropriate agenda; requests from other parties will be
placed on an appropriate future agenda at the discretion of the staff liaison.
The agenda shall be approved at each meeting prior to discussion of any item on the agenda. At the time
of agenda approval, items may be removed and the order of business may be modified by a majority vote
of members present at the meeting. No items shall be added to the agenda unless deemed as urgent by
the staff liaison. Prior to adjournment, members present may communicate items recommended for
inclusion on future agendas.
B. Recordkeeping
All minutes and resolutions shall be in writing and shall be kept in accordance with City procedures,
Minnesota Statute and Rules regarding preservation of public records and the Minnesota Data Privacy Act.
C. Work Plan
The Commission will draft an annual work plan that details activities and projected timelines for the
upcoming year.
• The Chair may appoint Commissioners to be primarily responsible for each work plan activity.
• The Commission may establish subcommittees to oversee work plan activities. The subcommittees
will be chaired by Commissioners appointed by the Chair.
• The Commission’s work plan will be submitted to the City Council, typically during the first quarter
of the calendar year. The Chair and/or Commissioners will attend a Council/Manager meeting to
discuss the annual work plan with the City Council.
• The Commission’s work plan must be agreed upon by the City Council.
D. Annual Report
The Commission shall submit an annual report to the City Council summarizing the past year's activities.
The report may highlight information the Commission feels appropriate to convey to the City Council.
• The Chair or Vice-Chair will prepare the report for approval by the Commission. Commission
members may submit signed addenda presenting alternative conclusions or perspectives.
• The report and addenda are submitted to Council with the current year work plan in the first
quarter of the calendar year or as soon thereafter as possible.
E. Subcommittees
The Commission may create subcommittees to plan and direct activities related to topics of interest to the
Commission and to oversee work plan activities.
• Subcommittees will be chaired by Commissioners appointed by the Chair and shall not consist of a
majority or more of currently appointed Commission members.
• A majority of the subcommittee must be present to conduct business, including the subcommittee
chair.
• The Commission may consolidate or dissolve subcommittees at any time.
• The subcommittee chair may appoint other Commissioners and representatives from the broader
community to the subcommittee, provided that the subcommittee at no time consists of a
majority or more of currently appointed Commission members.
BYLAWS – Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Commission 5
• The subcommittee chair shall report back to the Commission about its activities as an agenda item
at regular Commission meetings.
• Subcommittee meetings shall be held at a date and time that does not conflict with the
Commission’s regular and special meetings. The staff liaison shall be notified of the date, time,
location and topic of all Subcommittee meetings.
F. Performance of Duties
Commissioners are expected to adequately prepare for meetings. Commissioners unable to complete an
assigned task should notify the commission chair or subcommittee chair as soon as possible. The
Commission staff liaison may ask the City Council to review a Commissioner’s appointment based upon its
assessment of significant lack of performance.
Article V: Amendments and Revisions
The Commission will review these bylaws no later than the second meeting after May 1 every three years.
Members may present recommendations for changes and amendments. These bylaws can be altered or
amended at any regular monthly Commission meeting with a majority of members present, provided that
notice of the proposed changes and amendments is provided to each member at least 10 business days before
the meeting. The Council must review and approve any changes to, and has final authority regarding, these
bylaws.
Appendix: Glossary
This glossary is a set of terms adopted by the City to ensure common language and understanding regarding
diversity, equity and inclusion. When discussing the diversity, equity and inclusion efforts, use these terms and
definitions in all contexts:
Accountability: Processes and procedures that ensure the centering of equity in the decision-making process
Barrier: Social, economic and physical impediments constructed to decrease access to resources essential for
positive life outcomes
BIPOC: An acronym for Black, Indigenous, People of Color
Bias: A mental process that evaluates and classifies others by their appearance and/or behaviors based on
personal schemata. Bias influences our actions, beliefs and attitudes about others positively and negatively.
There are two types of bias in regards to equity and justice:
• Explicit: Bias we are aware of and act in the name of
• Implicit: Subconscious feelings, perceptions, attitudes and stereotypes developed over timei
Capacity Building: Exercises and trainings developed to ensure all members of a community work towards
equity
Community Engagement: Employment of a range of tools and strategies to ensure successful, accountable
relationships between an organization and the people it serves
Community Indicator: An impact on a life-outcome influenced by public policy
Disparity: A pattern of disproportionate life outcomes based on a social identity
Diversity: A measurement of individuals’ differences from one another in the form of social identities and lived
experiences; all the ways in which people differ.ii
Equity: Fair treatment, access, opportunity and advancement for all people; one’s social identity cannot
predict the outcome.
• Racial Equity: practices and policies to mitigate adverse impacts one’s race has on life outcomes
BYLAWS – Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Commission 6
Equality: Evenly distributed tools and assistance to access resources and opportunities
Human Rights: Rights inherent to all human beings, regardless of race, sex nationality, ethnicity, language,
religion or any other status. Human rights include the right to life and liberty, freedom from slavery and
torture, freedom of opinion and expression, the right to work and education, and many more.iii
Inclusion: Systems that allow for access to all spaces regardless of social identity; a variety of people have
power, a voice, and decision-making authority.
Inequality: Unequal access to opportunities and resources
Justice: Fixing the system to offer equal access to both tools and opportunity
Oppression: Intentional harm, construction and upholding of access to human and civil rights
• Personal: Thoughts, beliefs, and attitudes about yourself, coworkers, supervisors, customers, residents,
etc. based on their social identity
• Interpersonal: Negatively expressed words and actions based on social identity
• Institutional: Golden Valley (or other agency) enforced practices, policies and procedures that create
barriers to resources and opportunities
• Structural/Systemic: Golden Valley (or other agency) enforced practices, policies and procedures
created by larger entities (local, state, federal government and agencies)
Racialized Violence: An instance of bodily/mental harm as a result of systemic racism
Social Identity: All of the ways people are grouped and stratified in society e.g. race, socioeconomic status,
gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, ability, nation/language of origin, family structure, age, religion,
immigration status, marital status, etc.
Systemic Racism: A collection of institutions that create unequal access to resources and opportunities
i Source: US Justice Department
ii Source: City of Portland Office of Equity and Human Rights
iii Source: United Nations
ORDINANCE NO. 714
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE
AMENDING CHAPTER 2 OF THE CITY CODE RELATED TO
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
The City Council of the City of Golden Valley hereby ordains as follows:
Section 1. City Code Chapter 2, Article V, Section 128 is repealed, replaced,
renamed, and shall read as follows:
Sec. 2-128. – Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Commission.
(a) Establishment and Composition. A Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
Commission is hereby established, composed of eleven (11) members, nine
(9) who shall serve three-year staggered terms and two (2) voting youth shall
serve a one (1) year term. Youth members shall live or attend school within
Golden Valley, the Robbinsdale Area School District, or the Hopkins Area
School District and be enrolled in grades 9 through 12.
(1) In accordance with the City’s values and Welcome Statement, the
Council shall seek to have said appointments reflect the diverse
voices and perspectives in the community, including:
a. Individuals who have professional, volunteer, or personal
experiences with communities that have historically
experienced or presently experience the stress and trauma
of discrimination, for example, individuals with work or
volunteer experience in the field of diversity, equity and
inclusion, or personal involvement in advocacy or activism;
b. Individuals who have professional, volunteer, or personal
experiences with healing of marginalized communities; and
c. Individuals with personal experience involving discrimination.
(2) At a minimum the DEIC membership shall consist of:
a. One member with a connection to multi-family or group
housing; and
b. One member of a community group that has demonstrated
commitment to the values of racial equity, inclusion, social
justice, and human rights.
If the City does not receive qualified applications from one of the above
categories, the remaining spots may be filled with any person who lives,
works, attends school, volunteers, or worships in the City of Golden Valley.
(b) Mission. The DEI Commission’s mission is to promote and nurture a safe and
welcoming community dedicated to the values of social equity, inclusion, and
justice.
(c) Duties and Responsibilities. The Commission shall advise and make
recommendations to the Council in matters relating to diversity, equity,
inclusion, and human rights. In accordance with its bylaws and annual work
plan, and through the collaboration and cooperation of City staff, the DEI
Commission shall:
(1) Analyze the City’s processes, procedures, policies, and ordinances
as directed by the City Council on matters of diversity, equity,
inclusion, human rights.
(2) Present the results of programs of research and recommend
changes to processes, procedures, policies, and ordinances to the
City Council based on those results.
(3) Regularly review and evaluate the City’s community outreach
methods and activities to ensure messaging reaches diverse
populations and provides inclusive participation opportunities.
(4) Annually provide input on the City’s Equity Plan and, as requested
by City Manager, their designee, or City equity staff:
a. Analyze City systems to identify systems of inequality
(including systemic racism), and
b. Make recommendations relating to changes in ordinance,
policy, or practice to dismantle those systems.
c. Communicate the City’s diversity, equity, and inclusion
(DE&I) work and facilitate community engagement and
feedback.
d. Collaborate with organizations to host and promote events
that educate the community on issues of diversity, equity,
inclusion, and human rights, and other issues and to
promote awareness and appreciation of diversity.
Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect from and after its passage and
publication as required by law.
Adopted by the City Council this 1st day of June, 2021.
___________________________
Shepard M. Harris, Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________
Theresa J. Schyma, City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO. 21-44
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SUMMARY PUBLICATION OF ORDINANCE NO. 714
AMENDING CHAPTER 2 OF THE CITY CODE RELATED TO
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
WHEREAS, the City has adopted the above referenced amendment of the Golden
Valley City Code; and
WHEREAS, the verbatim text of the amendment is cumbersome, and the expense of
the publication of the complete text is not justified.
NOT THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Golden
Valley that the following summary is hereby approved for official publication:
SUMMARY PUBLICATION
ORDINANCE NO. 714
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE
AMENDING CHAPTER 2 OF THE CITY CODE RELATED TO
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
This is a summary of the provisions of Ordinance No. 714 which has been approved for
publication by the City Council.
The City currently has two bodies who support initiatives in the areas of human rights,
diversity, equity, and inclusion: a standing Human Rights Commission (HRC) and a
temporary Rising TIDES task force. This ordinance would repeal and replace the HRC with
the establishment of a new Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) Commission that embodies
the work of both groups. The ordinance will also codify the membership, mission, and
responsibilities of the newly created DEI Commission.
A copy of the full text of this Ordinance is available from the City Clerk’s Office.
Adopted by the City Council this 1st day of June, 2021.
Shepard M. Harris, Mayor
ATTEST:
Theresa Schyma, City Clerk
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Commission
Chris Mitchell 3 - year term Term expires -April 30, 2024
Jonathan Burris 3 - year term Term expires - April 30, 2024
Thomas Huling 3 - year term Term expires -April 30, 2024
Teresa Sit 3 - year term Term expires - April 30, 2024
Joelle Allen 3 - year term Term expires -April 30, 2024
Sheri Hixon 3 - year term Term expires - April 30, 2024
Melissa Johnson 3 - year term Term expires -April 30, 2024
Ruth Paradise 3 - year term Term expires - April 30, 2024
Ajani Woodson 3 - year term Term expires -April 30, 2024
Brad Taylor-White 3 - year term Term expires - April 30, 2024
8 Council Manager Meeting 6:30 PM Held Virtually
9 Building An Equitable Golden Valley Quarterly Conversation:
Closing the Disability Inclusion Gap in the Community 6:00 - 7:30 PM Held Virtually
10 Police Commission Task Force Meeting 5:00 PM Held Virtually
15 HRA Meeting 6:30 PM Held Virtually
15 City Council Meeting 6:30 PM Held Virtually
22-25 League of Minnesota Cities 2021 Annual Conference Varies Held Virtually
24 Golden Valley Business Council Meeting 8:30 AM to 9:30 AM Held Virtually
5 City Offices Closed for Observance of Independence Day
6 City Council Meeting 6:30 PM Hybrid
13 Council Manager Meeting 6:30 PM Hybrid
20 City Council Meeting 6:30 PM Hybrid
22 Golden Valley Business Council Meeting 8:30 AM to 9:30 AM Held Virtually/TBD
3 Minnesota Night to Unite
4 City Council Meeting (Wednesday) 6:30 PM Hybrid
10 Special City Council Meeting (Interviews) (Tentative) 5:00 PM Hybrid
10 HRA Work Session 6:30 PM Hybrid
10 Council Manager Meeting 6:30 PM Hybrid
17 Special City Council Meeting (Interviews) (Tentative) 5:00 PM Hybrid
17 City Council Meeting 6:30 PM Hybrid
26 Golden Valley Business Council Meeting 8:30 AM to 9:30 AM Held Virtually/TBD
ANNOUNCEMENT OF MEETINGS AND EVENTS
Three or more Council Members may attend the following
JUNE
JULY
AUGUST